The Sun. — London, England, 1821-11-29 00:00:00

.41i'L•P„ .. .. , 0 .) .. .----, ks , f• t, -72 ------, I Z 1 t • C 4 4,,, ~, , . .. -:, A. ~..,.. .. . . tt .. , 1 - 71 t • . 7 / 2 t 4ret 4 ..,...3 .. t . ~ , i ' r lait to , - / /"----) / ' , ..q. , ,, 11 1 . k„... :x i-, 4, ~, .p° ...,,- ...,v , , , . . .. . /(9 a',.-V;' /) e ~, , , ~....„ -- --461,;3, clid , • V 1.- / i/(71 1"-- - 1-",- / ;:elt, l/x, t- ' /,4 :- -ii lAO' ' \ ... . ro',\ \ `: ~.-; s • c ,vo NUMBER 9130.1 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 1821. - PRICE SEVENi,'EICE'. VICTUALLING -OFFICE, November 23, 1821. THE COMMISSIONERS for VICTUAL LING His 4 1 1AJESTY's NAVY do hereby give Notice, that on Tuesday, the 11th of December next, they .soill6e ready to receive Tenders in writing (sealed up) and treat with such persons •as will undertake to supply what ever FRESH BEEF may be required for the use of His Ma jesty's Ships and Vessels at Plymouth, Torbay, badmouth, kalmouth, Yarmouth, Lynn, and Welh, in the County of Norfolk; Brighton, • (nx Separate Contracts), for Twelve Months, from the Is. Jdn uarY to the 31st December, 182, inclusive ; to be paid for 171 Bill, payable, withont interest, sixty days after date. The Conditio i ns of the Contracts may be seen at the Secre tary's gifiCe, at this Office, orb,, applying to Mr. Thomas Agent for the Victualling at Plymouth, to the. Collectors of his Majesty's Customs, .at Dartmouth, Fat "uthi and Yarmouth respectively', to Mr. Thomas Russell, d igcnt for the Victualling at Dover, and to the Postmaster at Brighton. To Sail on the 2d December, was, that informatios., had been given to the Marshal that the Coffee-hOut;e; kept by a person named Poole, had been ' kept open at late hours of the night, and that he did not in stantly dismiss that person. But it appears upon the affida vits now before the Court, that the Marshal did caution • -and threaten that person, and did dismiss hin - at the, ensu • ing Lady-day. 'Colonel Bailey did not complain of any per • sonal inconvenience sustained by himself inconsequence ei the Marshal not dismissing this person sooner ; but he only complained that he was not dismissed more promptly. Still,' however, the Marshal was the best judge ofthis matter; and in delaying his dismissal to that late period he did not appear to be very seriously to blame, more especially as the fact of that dis missal had not been brought before the Court in Colonel Bailey's affidavit ; but, on the contrary, leaving the .Court to suppose, until otherwise informed on the other side, that that person still kept the coffee-house. Another ground of complaint re lated to the permission given to two of -the turnkeys to have a room in the prison. Now a great deal mu s t ba left to the cretion of the Alarshal in a matter of this kind, considering the great variety of character in the persons who resorted to this prison ; and it would be impossible on that account to lay down, any definite and precise regulation for the condirct of the Mar shal. But if, upon inquiry by the Master of this Court, it should be found necessary to make any farther regulations than already existed upon this, subject, the Court would make such further order and regulation.as might be suggested by him for that purpose. The remainin g m a tt er o f comp laint was, that the Marshal was not resident within the prison. The Marshal had hidd,n great deal before the Court; upon 'this subject,. Which tended to a very great extent to excuse.much of what had taken place ; bathe Court was still undoubtedly of opinion, that the Act of Parliament mustbe complied with as to the question of Nsidence. It was imperative that Ile shall reside within the -- wallsor the rules of the prison. The Court, therefore, would . give the MarShal - until the first day Of next Term, to report to the Court what measures- he shall - have taken to comply with :this order. At the same time, in making this order, it ,was• due to their Lordships to say, that from all the knowledge which each of them had respecting the Marshal's conduct, - judicial and extra-judicial, they thought him a very meritorious officer. —He was indeed very discreet in his conduct to those in-- his custody, speaking of them' at large, and very charitable .and kind to the poorer classes of those placed •under his care.— Notwithstanding this, the rule which required his residence in the'prison or within the rules must be zomplicd with, and the Court would here a ft er ma k e such further order as would produce that object The case had been comp ar ed :to that 6f Mr. Bryant. That person had not been removed in the first irrstance ; but, upon a complaint coming before the Court a second time, and it appearing that he not only did no t reside, but had taken upon himself to appoint a deputy, thereby Put, ting the authority of the Court at defiance, -it-became necessary to remove him fromthe office altogether. The distinction between the two cases therefore was very manifest. The terms of the rule now before the Court were,. that tile Marshal should answer the : matters of the affidavits and pay the costs of•the application. The only remaining point therefore'for the cOnsideration of the Court was,'the subject of costs. Now; all thatrelated personally to Colonel Bailey, had been satisfacto-• rilY answered by the Marshal. All that referred to this part of the case- might have been laid before the Court in a very short affidavit, and answered by as short a one on'the part co!' the Marshal. But the matter did not rest there. If Colonel Bailey had made out his personal complaint to the satisfaction. of the Court; the Court would not have hesitated in giving - him the costs of complaining. Considering, however,-the natural anxiety to which the Marshal must have been subjected, from a groundless imputation of personal misconduct—considering that the affidavits had been mixed up with a great deal of *matter of, a personal nature, which had been most satis'actorily an', Swered—And considering also that the Court could not butsee throughout the whole of the affidavits that the motives of thisl application were really founded upon the refusal of the Marshal to allow the rules of.the prison to this person a second time, that person not being able to find sufficient security to the Marshal's satisfaction ;'and 'and when the Court looked to the important fact, which Colonel Bailey thought proper to withhold when hefirst applied to,the Court, namely,d the dismissal of Pool e , th e co ff ee house keeper, the Court di . not think that such an application was entitled to any encouragement, and therefore the hue winch had been obtained must be discharged with costs. The .Uotirt would make such further order as appearednecessarv, touching the residence of the Marshal.—Rule discharged With costs. . more. A sum of 2461. had beer. deducted for expence of Lon don agents, and for preparinand enrolling deeds ;•241. for eft pences and tees of q. B; Waite r . and 1501. was retained by the agents of the Fantees, Williams, Pringdale, and F ores dil e ; anti 1e , 91.. for tee rem a i n i ng grantee, Johnstone; to answer the first year's payment of the annuity . of 2501. It was upon.. the latter reservation of p ar t o f the original sum that the Learned Sergeant said he grounded his right to make this rot 'opon the breach of the Act of the 53d of the late liing—The•Cotrrt .gr,inted the rule to chew cause. For VAN DIEMAN'S LAND, and NEW SOUTH WALES, with liberty to call at Madeira, • N 1 1 " -- t. , .„ THE fine fast- sa ili ng new - coppere d SHIP DENMARK HILL, JOHN FORE i` MAN, Comma n d er , b urt h en 230 T ons, now 7 , ,-, - . , lying in the Loudon Don. Has only aceo:n nmdations for two more Cabin Passengers. For Freight or Pdssage, apply to BUCKLES; BAGSTER, and BUCHANAN, 33, Marls-lane. . . Margate, POLICY OF INSURANCE ON THE SHIP VIT TORIA. PEAD V. ISAACKE. The Downs, Dover Roads, With all dispatch, For VAN DIEMEN'S LAND and NFW SOUTH WALES, With Liberty to call at &Oa, THE fine fast-sailing new-coppered SHIP MACCLESFIELD, JOHN MOORE, Commander, ,Burth e n -285 tons, lying in 4. M. the London Dock. HIS excellent accom ., modations for Cabin and Steerage Passengers. For which, or for Freight, apply to BUCKLES, SAG STER, and BUCHANAN, 33, Marl-lane. New Romney, and Mr. Sergeant TADfIY applied — to the Court in this case to have the rule of consOlidaton.opened under the peculiar im portance. of all the interests concerned. ' The Court was aware that 13:,0001. was depending upon the result-B,oooh - upon the ship Vittoria, and 5,0001. on her freight. The . underwriters had undertaken to consolidate the whole of the actions, an - d to try tTicin upon one issue. It was understood that Mr. Read :lad received on the 16th of March, 1821, a letter fro m the Cap6in, dated on the2Bth Sept e mb er of the preVioits year, and inform_ ing himthat he had sold the ship by 'public auction, and should have the whole of .the other particulars in a few d a y s . ft was erear, therefore, from the receipt of such a letter, that Mr. Read had known of "the fate of the ship on the 16th of March, and might then have made an abandonment if he pleased. In .9 plying to have the consolidation rule opened, it was not the in tention of the parties to try over again the sea-Worthiness of.tte ship • but the Captain's right to sell at Calcutta, under all 'the peculiar circumstances of his . situation. Upon any terms the Court imposed, they ivished- to try that question , : they were ready. to Day into Court the whole stini.cif 13,0001- in issue, and he truated that the rule would be'opened owing to the very great inr,)ortloceof the issue to th e mercantile world. Mr: Sergeant LEti'S opposed the application, which he'-Fold was, - in fact, to grant a new t r i a l wi t h out th e least appearanceof surprise, or a change of factS 'in the case. - .They 'had 'already had every opportunity of developing . the Whole of their cake bn the trial, •and yet' now they came ,forward upon new grounds which 'the3i-might- have, if they pleased, - urged on the trial, to call for a new hearing of the same facts; On the ground, riot of any misrepresentation, but of having been misunderstood at the trial. • - • • •'• FOR PASSENGERS ONLY. To sail this week, - For the ISLE of.FRANCE and CEYLON, With Liberty to call at Mddeira, , . . TILE fine fzist - sailing SHIP :. ;:ic.. - , GLOBE, THOMA - S CUZENS, Coinnian 1. '\ — V\ ' ` - der Borden 365 . Tons, lyi ng i n t h e Ci ty \- .--.- n3 .- ( arial,l3lackwall. Has excellent acconinio dal ionS. Fur which apply to BUCKLES, BAGSTER; and . BU CHANAN, 33, Mark-lane. 1%4 regard will be had to any Tender in w - ich the Price shall not be inserted in words at length,,or theft shall not be delivered to the Board before One o'clock on the said Tuesday, the liti.cf beceMber next ; •nor unless the Person wAo make: the Tender, or some PEl'soti on his behalf; attends to answer when called for. Each Tender must be accompanied by a Letter signed b y two responsible Persons, en aging to become bound with the Party tendering, in the penal slim of 20001., for, the due , performance. of the Contract at Plymouth, and of 5001. for each of the other Contracts. • To T. TAYLOR, Esq.* N 0.9, New Bridge-street, Landon. HONOURED SIE, • . I BEG leave to inform you, that ever . since the year 1790, I had been afflicted with the LueSVenereal, which, from its obstinately resisting every course . ol.medicine prescribed by the most eminent of the faculty here,"and• un dergoing severalsevere courses of salivation, and twice- . dis charged from the Hospital with littl e re li e f, wou ld appear to be of the most inveterate nature. In the spring'tit•last year my disorder had got to such a head,-as nearly to put a periad to my existence-4 bad a large ulcer on the crown of. myllead, one en each arm, and my legs were broke out in a frightful manner; my right was dreadfully 'painful, and had been in a state of ulceration for the last seven years; my left had also two large nodes on it, was very much discoloured,.and gave me such excruciating pain, particularly when Warm in bed, as nearly-to„deprive me of rest; - is this lamentable state, I 'as recommended by Thompson, (who received so great a'cutelObeiii . here), to take your Leake's Patent Pills; which 171.iegan to on-the 26th .o.'May; in th e course of a fortnight I. began to receive. henetitin'little Atiore• th.an month the ulcers on my head and arms were soundly hea!ed.- 7 , soon after, the sores on my legs healed also;• leaving; how-, ever, considerable discolouration in the skin, and pain in the bone of the left, which, by the blessing of Goci anol.a little longer perseverance in your in valuable Medicine,. subsided ; the nodes dispersing, the skin regaining its natural hue, and the nocturnal pains gradually going otl.—l thus became, by your liberal advice and medicine, perfectly, free from all my former coniplaints—have recovered my fornier spirits a nd strength, and am become jolly and fat, in whielt state having continued many months, to the astonishment of all who knew u-e, lamat a loss in what terms to express mrgratittide, hut beg you, for the good of other suffering' mortals, - to Wake. 'this my case as public as possible, as I shall on every Occa- - sion ; in so doing you will greatly oblige, Sir; your grateful, obedient, very humble servant, - • --- ALEX. MURKER Swan!s•Clse, High-street, Edinburgh. • Witnesses to the above Cure:— . _ . . Mr. Sergeant PET.L. follciwed on the same side, and repeated similar argi:rnents. SergearifTADDY (in reply) reiterated the importance of the issue, and urged again that the queStion of law as to the right of the-Captain to sell, had not been adequately pressed upon the facts as disclosed, which appeared in some way Eo have been - misunderstood by the Learned Counsel on the Hirkteii . his Motion has one of indulAttize... and as Sucb . .lie prayed it, upon any term* th e - Court pleased to impo se . Lord . Chief Justice DALLAS, after some prefatory observ"X dons upon the ill consequences arising from-taking cases ort the paper out of thevourse,- which in this instance gave the plAintiff an advantage which otherwise he could not have obtained: until the next term, proceeded to state, that if there were any tlOg in the reasons urged for opening the consolidation mile, which went to the justice of the case, he shouldbe most anxious to gio the parties the advantage now soughtin their behalf. Mb ties of the case had been, however, thoroughly sifted by a • special Jury, composed partly of underwriteri and partly of commer cial-men:who were ship-owners, who thought, as their verdict spewed, that the Captain had in point of fact sold the ship for tbe benefit or all the parties in the cause. How, then,. could the .Ccurt, upon ,the reasons urged, grant the present APPlke.- then ? it was true that the Court were always disposed to-open a consolidation 'rule, where permitting the verdict prefibt:S:y had to stand, would be productive of injustice ; but the Cotrrt cor.lci not come to such a conclusion here, nor now permit tie rule to be opened upon a mere point of font., involving only tie particular ti oe when the notice of a'mmlon -neat was The law nt' ”handonment had been already laid 'cown in that Court, and they would now adhere to the . adjudication up9n that point, for the reasons given whet; it was pronourced.. The Court could not in the present case accede to the . a ppli cat i on f or opening-the consolidation rule. • ' . , Mr. Justice P ARK an d M r . JusticeTußno UGH *ere bf opi- - nion that to open the consolidation ; rule in. this case would - he.». productive of injustice.. • Pi crizeiLL&a-OFFICE, Nov. 20, 1821. HE COMMISSIONERS for VICTUAL LING His MAJESTY'S NA VY do hereby give No- That on Friday, the 14th of Dc tuber ne.it, 'they will ready to receive Tenders in writing (sealed op),Coul treat f" the soPply . (on sep a r a t e C on t racts ) o f a ll such 7aantities (if SEA PROVISIONS, FRESH BEEF, and RUM, as nzazt he required for the service of His Majesty's Ships and Vessels at M e several places under-mentioned, for the-space of Twelve Calendar .ifontlis from the days respectively stated against " c4 ,1i2 ~, Sea { Greendck . • r fotisi ons Leith, Leith R oa d s , and th e ) 16th February • . Firth of Edinburgh .... f Fr' • Peterhead ah Dublin and Dunleary - }..3 Beef. ..), ......, - , Liverpool ... 9 '4l Imndonderry & Lotighswilly lath February Ru m. f Greenock ... .. 6th January .7% I Liverpool - j 6 e paid for by Bills payable, without interest, sixty clays ofer date. f:lThe Conditions of the Contracts may he seen at the Seere -7:1 .0:11ice, at this Office, or by applying to the Collectors 7. ;14 Alajesty's Customs at Greenock, beith, Liverpool, S'e 4f c ) . — t ,onctei ry , to 1. 1 . e Postmaster at Peterhead, and to the Itt:cY 1 ° the Postmaster-General at Dublin respectively. .shrill. ; e "rd will be had to any Tender in which the Price he d'h!, 4 •ke iiverted in words at length, or that shall not PeiL . '' re " to the Board before One o'Cloch on the said tc4-0471,th 14th of December next, nor unkss the Person tenifi",'"'" tie Tender, or same PCTSOn on hts behalf, at e"' "uviver when called for. 1 4 , tlthTendcr t 711114 also he accompankd by a Letter signed 14, il .° respnirsible Persons, ens,raging to &o Tme bound with 7 „erY tendering, in he Knal Su !I 500. for the due f ' , r ' r - -74 ' 14. ( C e' Of each of the Contracts; and the Contractors e diAlinetly to understand that no mode (f payment u , ill be theted to ty the B oar d, b u t b y t h e d e li very of t h e Bills to tqf r i rli es aemsetre.s. or their 'auth Lo orized "'gents, on app1i ,....:" at the 17 ' lualling Office in nddn. ---......._ o • fohn Th4r4son, No. 3, New Poultry Market, Edinburg h, John M'lntosh, Old Assembly Close, Edinburgh. PrepaNd and sold by the sole Proprietor, THOMAS TAY LOR, Member of the Royal College of Surgeons, at- his house, No. 9; New. Bridge-street, London; 'when!, after a Constant residence Of more than 40 years, in a practice parti cularly directed to: the cure at Venereal omplaints and those incidental to -the Parts of Generation, with that inviolable secrecy Which men of his profession.snonid always observe in such cases he flatters himself •the sydvicc and •assiStance he gratuitously administers to persons taking thi s M e di c i ne , w ill .be esteemed, by a discerning Public, as an advaitage:seldom 'attainable, and void of all ambiguity. ' • ' Also sold, by his appointment, tor the convenience of those living at a distance, at the Toyshop, No. 103, - Oxford-street; Mr. Disborough's, No. 7, Fish-street-hill; Mr.. Baxter, SouthAiridge, Edinburgh ; Mt. Callwel .'s, ;' and of one person in every considerable town in Great Britain and Ireland, in boxes afonly 2s. 9d. each, stained; and sealed qp with full and plain directions, whereby persons, of either sex maveure thom'elves with ease, speed, secrecy, and safety. , . . . . Mr. Justice lit CHA lin so x said; that the circurnit:4ces in.:l. vowed in the application this day were different front those ,in that made yesterday, when he had the misfortune of -4ifFering from the rest of the Court: lle'was of opinion with hisbrethren, t that this application ought not to- be granted. . . . THE KING V. LEWIS LEVI. ' This defendant (in company with Mosely Woolf, Kinnear, and others) was convicted in. the year 1819 of conspiracy, and was sentenced to a line of 5,00u1. and two years' imprisonment in Gloucester Gaol. T f ';'"C TU.-1 L !NG- OFFICE, Nov. 27, 1821. ILE COMMISSIONERS f or VICTUAL . PwG His MAJESTY'S NAVY do hereby giv e No .ice, nett on Friday, the 7th of December next, they will be for 7e afiV t o rece ive - Tenders in w r iti ng ( sea l e d up ) , an d treat FTC Ilun ' dred Sa c k s o f KILN DRIE D HOUSEHOLD ltr LOUR, to be subj ec t to t h e usual. warranty of Twelve nth., 4 ?,fc 1 ,./ Y One 7'honsand Sacks of BISKET MEAL ; 1741 Tons of NW E OATMEAL; 'tree Handeed Quarters of New Pale and One hundred Quarters of Neui Close dried AMBER MALT: lo be clkciveraVe to samples of One Quart each, to be produced 7,0 with the 7'entlerS; .1),6e delivcretl into His M ajes t y ' s Pietualling Stores at ntf°lll , in the space of one month (th e Fl our and Meal by qu a/ weekly proportiolis). w hat Hogsh ea d, B arre l , Kilderhin, Firkin, Long and bondeShod P ink, and Stout Hazel Wood HOOPS, may be de tro',ert for the use of the Stores aforesaid, for one y ear , 4 ,7 the 22d December next ; and ( ' rT hree Hundred Mille of GOLDSTONE or BROWN ''ILLOW RODS (not less than 48 inches in length) to be answerable to samples of 500 each great tale, to he also ZtProduced with the 7'e;ulers, and to be deliorredinto the ore . at Deptford between Ist December and Ist March 2%4; by regular monthly proportions. tar o nditions of the Contracts may be seen at the Score °Are. Mau ti rd Willie had to any Tender in which the Price not.t "t be inserted in words at length, or that shall ,pri! delivered to the Board before One o'Cloch On the said s c ,„ ``. l 4 the 7th of December next; nor unless the Per wio, Os some Pe rsononhis behalf; \ a newer vtt e , 4 aes the Tender, or when collet/Ai. 1111 EAST INDIA HOUSE, Nov. 14, 1821. IE COURT of DIRECTORS of the .11,4,ThUNITED COMPANY of MERCHANTS of ENG , : Noti ce, TRADING to the EAST INDIES, do hereby gi ve L out the QUARTERLY GENERAL COURT of the said hafjpanY aPpointed to be held at their House in Leaden tie 'street, on WEDNESDAY, the 19th December next, at p ur ve rt o'Clock in the forenoon, is made SPECIAL, for the Gene of submitting for confirmation the Resolution of the li l ti: r al Court of the 26th September, approving the Peso_ 14tra -:! the Court of Directors of the 29th August last, , I ,t l g to Dr. JOHN BORTHWICK GILCHRIST, as N utu I URER in the HINDOSTANEE LANGUAGE, the )4elito . 151. 200 1. per annum, for a further term of Three Years, er with an allowance of tool. per annum, to enable i s o.'o proride a suitable Lecture Room.—The said Resolution .. ( P l ett ta. this House for the inspection of the Proprietors.. U en l _ Court of Directors do also give notice, that the said f auhirlyril: Court is further made SPECIAL, for the purpose o l tou rt t ing for confirmation the Resolution of the General o f the of the 26th September last, approving the Resolution RrantnCoUrt of . Directors of the :41i of the same mon th, Xstio,o,t° Mr. JOHN HINDE PELLY, of tin:Bombay C ivil .. thit".2unlent, the suet of 4 '2000, upon the grounds therein 'II R . littb e e ,.. !Port required by the By'Law, Cap. 6. Sec. 20. .to h4, AVith the Ili ocuments.upon which the said Resolution Priet:e° f ormed, are open for the inspection of the Pro -45 4t this ouse. JOSgPli DART, Secretary. PROSL'ECTUS OF THE LONDON WINE COMPANY, No. 141, FLEET-STREET, Which commenced THIS DAY. UPON the annoancement of an Undertaking, of no ordinary magnitude, the Proprietors feel it proper to submit to the consideration of the Public the following view of its objects and arrangements : The LONDON WINE COMPANY, after having . occu pied the. greater part of the p resen t y ea r i n b u ildi ng and fitting up appropriate Premises, take leave to announce their intention of commencing Business on the 29th Instant. These Premises are situated in the extensive Court, the entrance to which is by the Gateway, 141, FLEET-STREET ; and comprehending the whole of the inner Court, are foruied upon a scale fully ade quate to the transaction of business of the utmost magnitude.— The Cellars, which are peculiarly dry and spacious, are at pre sent stocked, and will always contain from 30,040 to 40,000 Dozens of the choicest Wines, of every class and Country. But although. this Company feel it necessary thus to conform With the usual mode of giving publicity to the nature and ex tent of their Establishment, they would rather invite direct and personal examination of its merits, As they aim at no other pre ference than that which they may lle.really found to deserve ; and having taken the utmost care to be furnished with none but genuine Wines, of the best &your and quality, they offer that invitation with peculiar confidence. As they cannot, how ever, calculate upon general attention to any invitation or Ad clress on mere anonymous authority, esoecially after the quent delusions to which the Public have been subjected, the Company think it proper to declare, that with them originated, and by them is at present conducted, the LONDON GE NUI:NE TEA COMPANY, 23, LUDGATE-HILL, with all its extensive ramifications. The success of this Company is COnfelsedly without parallel • in the annals of. trade. -For al though it commenced business so late as 1818, it is at present, notwithstanding the importance and respectability ,of its com petitors, at the head of the Tea Trade ;—lts utility is indeed admitted, and its establishment Complete.- TO those, then, who, during the existence of that Company, have thought proper to honour it with their patronage, the gro prietors feel assured that they may refer on this occasion for the superioi character of their articles, and the consistent rectitude of their dealings; and resolving to make the same system the rule of their conduct in their new Establishment, they cannot doubt of success. But having sensibly felt the good effect of that system, it would be a dereliction of the duty which they owe to the Public, as well as of the duty which they owe to themselves; to hazard their obvious interest by any departure from its principle, or by any relaxation of its character. Looking, indeed, to permanent reputation, which is - essential to permanent profit, they cannot allow any temporary'expedient to interfere with their purpose. O course,"then, they can never descend to obtrude any such promises as daily appear in the imposing placards which are so ostentatiously exhibited in almost every thoroughfare in town, with regard to " Cheap Wines," those Wines being - offered at a price, for which they could not possibly be sold, were they really of the quality or character which. they purport' to possess:--- But the solicitude of the London Wine Company. shall be, in their new Undertaking, what it has uniformly been in the Tea Trade, namely,—to render their Stock comparatively cheap rather by the superior quality of that Stock, than by tiispoSing of an inferior article at a low price, which at any price must be dear to the consumer. Thus, while the London Wind Company disclaim all affecta tion, their object being to establish an equitable reciprocity by securing a fair article for the Public, with a fair profit for them selves' m the Proprieto rs hop e t o re d uce t h at system} of imposture, which under the alluring guise of cheapness has been too loiig prevalent; and thus, to.acconiplish that with respect to Wines, .which they unquestionably effected with respect to Teas. `The lamentable practice of adulterating Wines.,..has, unfor tunately, gone to a most alarming excess of late years; and to the very considerably augmented importation Of what ate term ed Cape Wines, that adulteration is principally to be attributed. The facilities, indeed, which these Wines, both red- and white, afford to the adepts in such reprehensible practices, are become so very glaring, while the quality of thoSe Wines is so notori ously bait, that the London Wine Company have determined at the outset that on ho consideration shall Cape Wines ever be admitted into their Cellars. The London Wine Companyare amply supplied with Porti of the generally esteemed best vintages, among which they have a large Stock that has been from 4 to 32 years in bottle ; while, to insure a supply of the finest FRENCH WINES, they have had a special Agent in that country upon whose skill and in» dustry they can confidently rely, from the Wines which he has already forwarded. . But since this establishment has been in contemplation ; and especially since preparations have commenced for bringing if to maturity, the Company have availed themselves of every op portunity that offered, for selecting the oldest and finest Wines from the cellars of the most eminent merchants in the City. They have happily too met with occasions, peculiarly favour able to their object, among merchants retiring from business, and private gentlemen about to break up their establishments; and there is scarcely any eminent shipper, for the last thirty years, from whose importations the Company have not made purchases, under the guidance of :.the most competent judges of Wines, whose advice and aid the Proprietors have engaged in the conduct of their new Establishment. The London Wine Company will always keep a Stock of Foreign Spirits, which may be depended upon as being of ge nuine and superior qualities, and which will be sold at equi table Prices, both wholesale and retail. Such are the grounds upon which the Proprietors of this Company take leave to solicit the patronage of the Public. The character of the London' Genuine Tea COmpany affords, it, is presumed, a sufficient guarantee to gentlemen resident in the Country, or to families occasionally visiting Town, for the punctual and faithful execution of any orders with which they may be pleased to favour the London %Vine Company. This Company think it proper to state, that they can execute no orders for less than one dozen of Wine. The following is a Statement of the Company's Wines, with their Prices : Fine Port (old in the wood) per dozen 42s Ditto, warranted vintage 1815 (ditto) . . 46s Crusted Bottled Port Ms to 72s Superior old ditto, 5 to 8 years in bottle • 72s to 84s Ditto, 8 to 22 ditto 84s to 6 Guineas Old Port in wood per pipe £9O to £126 Fine old Sherry per dozen 46s Superior old Pale ditto 54s to 60s Particularly soft-flavoured Amontillado . 60s to 65s Curious old Sherry, 16 years in bottle 6 Guineas Fine old Sherries in wood per pipe £95 to £126 Fine West India Madeira per dozen 50s to 60s East India ditto 70s to 84s Most curious ditto, 6to 16 years in bottle 6to 10 Guineas Madeiras in wood per pipe £llO to £126 Very fine Teneriffe . per dozen 42s to 46s Bucellas • • • 48s Calcavella • • • • 45s Lisbon • • • -45 s &c. &c. FRENCH WINES. Light-flavoured Claret . per dozen 72s . • Very fine Claret 90s . . . . . Clarets, first growth, Margot and Lafitte . £to £5 15s Latour 5 Guineas . . . White and Red Hermitage . 5 Guineas . . Sauterne - . 75s to 90s . . . . Barsac . 7.5 s to 90s • • • • Coti Rotie • . • • £5 lOs Frontignac . • £4 : Champagne . • 90s to 7 Guine as . . Superior curious Burgundy . . . sto 7 Guineas Hock . - . 4to 8 Guine as • .. Moselle • • • • 60s to 72s . . An Agent will be appointed in every Principal Town, but no application will be received unless the postage is paid. IMPERIAL CLOTH FOR SHIRTING, &v. By his Majesty's Letters Patent. Ne contenent pas de lin mais en possedent les agretnens. THE NOBILITY, FAMILIES, and MER CHANTS, are respectfully informed, the above de sirable Cloth for the East and West Indies, as well as the cold climates, fur its healthfulness to wear at sea, for Youth at school, and for a variety of family purposes, for its pecti liar economy, is regularly sold, Wholesale, for Exportation, and by the single piece, at 1811.-- , 25.-2s. 6d.-3s.—and 3s. 6d. per yard, stamped, MILLARD'S PATENT 'TWINE CLOTH, at. their Warehouse, No. 16, CHEAPSIDE, and no where else whatever. The Pieces for Sheeting contain from two' to four pair, adaptod for winter wear, the cold climates, and for travelling. Families in the country, on sending their orders (by post) will have them executed as if present, and the greatest variety of Foreign and British Goods are con stantly . on sale, LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, N0V.28. DAVIDSON V. THOMPSON. This was an application made by Mr. HART, on the part of the plaintiff, praying that an order might be directed to issue for the payment of a sum of money, claimed to be due to him as part owner of a vessel which he had been charged with for repairs. The facts of the c ase are s h ort l y these :--The defend ant was owner of two-thirds, and the plaintiff owner of one third share in the vessel, which had gone through six voyages., but in preparing for prosecuting the seventh, she had under gone sundry repairs, and towards which the applicant was al [edged to be charged properly with 1,0001. On the other side, Mr. HEALD and Mr. MacHIN contended that the plaintiff had himself permitted the repairs to be clone without expressing any objection, and that he was consequent ly not intitled to any relief. The LORD CHANCELLOR decided, that the motion should be dismissed, on the ground that as the plaintiff had allowed the repairs to be done without putting in any declaration that he would not share in the expellee ; or given any idea that he gave up his claim to the profits that might eventually accrue, he could not rule that the money ought to be paid. The ques tion here ought to be decided, not only with a view to the pre sent; but to future cases, and being unaquainted with the rule on which the Court of Admiralty decided such points, he should, in the event of saying nothing further in the case, dis miss the motion with costs, for though the vessel might cer tainly be more valuable at the conclusion of the voyage from the repairs that had been done, yet she might also from circum stances be so much dilapidated from wear and tear, that she would not be so valuable. It was clear that the plaintiff had no right to say he would have the ship valued at the moment she was about .to sail, without entering into a recognizance to share mutually in the voyage, and with this view, if he said nothing more on it, he should make an order in the terms he had mentioned. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov. 28. THE BUSINESS OF THE COURT. The Lon'n CHIEF JUSTICE, on coming into Court, inti mated that it was necessary to postpone all matters likely to occupy much time until the 10th of January, when the Judges will sit to dispose of the business in arrear. THE KING'S BENCH PRISON. IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM JONES, ESQ. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE, adverting to the. application which had been made to the Court ag a i nst the Marshal of the King's Bench prison, said that the Court had considered the case, and some of its Members had rea d over the affidavits on both sides with great attention. It appeared, taking the whole of the affidavits together, that the matter of a personal nature, of which Colonel Bailey had complained; had taken place so long ago as the 21st or 22d of December last matter which related to some threatening expressions used by some other person towards Colonel Bailey. As to that matter, in the judgment of the Court; the ground of complaint against the Marshal personally to Colonel Bailey had been answered satis factorily. The Court thought that the Marshal had acted Most discreetly in not bringing those parties to get h er before him, but in hearing them separately, although he might have been justified in sending one or both to Hor semonger-lane Gaol. * The Marshal certainly was not subject to any blame for taking a more mild and lenient measure, that course having the effect of keeping peace within the walls of the prison. What related to Colonel Bailey personally .was therefore answered most satisfactorily. Another ground of complaint Mr. Cu RWOOD now moved for a writ of Habeas Corpus, in order that the custody of the pri soner m i g h t b e changed. The sentence of the Court (the Learned Counsel said) ran thus : " The defendant was to be imprisoned two years in Gloucester Gaol, to pay a fine of 5,0001., and to be further imprisoned un til such fine was paid." The two years being now expired, Levi remained a prisoner for his fine unpaid ; but it did not form (Mr. Curwood submitted) any part of the sentence that the imprisonment for fine should be in the same gaol as the im piisonment for punishment. An affidavit was then produeed from Levi, -stating his extreme bad health, and the opinion of medical men that change of air was necessary to his life ; the deponent further declared that his wife was dying, and that his. children were in a state of beggary ; and prayed that he might be removed to some prison in or near London. ' Mr. CURWOOD submitted that (by the expiration of the term of two years) the defendant's situation was changed from that of a criminal prisoner to that of a crown debtor.; .and cited two cases of removal of prisoners—one unon the ground of insecu rity in a particular gaol ; and another upon the ground that (being confined for misdemeanour) the prisoner had been sent to a gaol which was a gaol for felons only. The COURT thought that they had no power to interfere.— By the terms in which the sentence was recorded, the defendant was delivered to the keeper of the particular gaol, to be kept by that keeper in custody for a certain stated term, and furtlier Until his fine (if any) should be paid. The LOUD CHIEF JUSTICE observed, upon the defendant's affidavit, that the contents, if true, might have effect in another quarter. • BISHOP V. irALLETT. This was a - motion to set aside a commission granted by the Court to examine witnesses atliuenos Ayres.. The parties to be examined were three gentlemen named Dyson, Nonell, aial Wild ; and the subject matter was a cargo of goods shipped some years since from this country to South America. .Mr. GURNEY' obtained a rule to shew cause why the com mission should not be set aside. The rule was granted upon an affidavit produced, which alleged that the commission had been sought for delay, and that two of the witnesses (Nir. Dyson and another) were actually in England. Mr. SCAJSLETT now shewed cause against Mr. Gurney's rule, and in 'his turn produced an affidavit. That affidavit stated that Mr. Dyson only had arrived in England ; that he was in such bad health as to be utterly incompetent to busi ness; that he had left all and documents with Messrs. Nonell and Wild, who were still 'in' Buenos Ayres ; and that, in fact, he could throw no light upon the transaction. Mr. GURNEY (in reply) endeavoured to shew that all the ma terial facts of the case were in the knowledge of Mr. Dyson. The COURT thought that, upon Mr. Scarlett's affidavit, the necessity for the commission still existed, and decided that Mr. Gurney's rule should be discharged. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Nov: 28. • iiENC} V. rwt - mokp. Mr. Sergeant HuLLOCK moved the Court for a rule to skew cause why the annuity deeds in this 4 case should not be cancelled. He grounded his motion upon the cad of the late King, C. 141, sect. t, which regulated a new mode of registration, and also provided that where any part of the sum granted upon an an nuity should be retained for the purpose of answering the pay ment of any future, art of the said ann u ity, o r un de r a ny o th er pretence whatever, "it should be liwful f or th e Co ur t i n w hi c h any action should be brought to recover en the annuity deed,, to set aside and "cancel .the same.. The faCts Of - the present case Were these:—Mr. Hammond was.a student in the.Uaiversity of Cambridge, and - two friends Of his there at time, Messrs. Hopper and smith, also studentS, applied through his . uiediurn to negotiate a loan of 1,4001. Ir. Hammond applied to a perty to transact the business, and the necessary .arrangements were prepared. On the Bth of Al aY, U.lB, Mr. Hammond went to Mr. George B. White; at an inn at ('a abridge, to complete the deeds, and - - receive .the money he signed and sealed them, and also confessed judgment in two warr a nt s o f Attorney, for there were two annuity deeds of 9031. each: The defendant, against whom an action. was brought upon one of these deeds, now deposed, that neither himself; nor Messrs. Hopper. and Smith, for whom he negociated the loan, ever received the full sum of 1,5001., for which sum the said deeds had been granted that the whole amount they received was only 9811., and no PR_ERQOATiVE- COURT.; Nov. 2C •' No businCss particular interest iameon to • -day,---Two rro : ticins of course were made for the CoUrt's 'giant of_ lettei : s. of ministration to next of kin, in cases where the widow and - 111 mother were .resident abroad ; 'due -notices having been -served' upon the pillars of the . Royal txchange. The Court gzantkd the.prayer, but intimated that in any itititte instance of intes-, tacy, wherein the widow mi g ht b e res id en t in, Framed; or:soMe - other part of. the continent, the Court would not hold tilt mere publication of notice on thi Royal Exchange sufficient, 'but. would require. to'be - satisfied that due diligence hanceti ud in . conveying such notification to the party so dwelling out of the kingdom. ... • LEITII AND ANOTHER V. Hr.NRI. At the-request :of Dr. LUSHINGTON; into whose hands tire papers relative to. his, client's case had been very shortly Ilefop • deposited, this cause was postponed to the by-day. . • Dr. 3E NNrlt.,fOrtllC information of the C our t, • stated 'that . this was a cause'of interest Mrs. Henri was usually resideltt in France; and in the French courts a divorce snit wa.s noir pend ing betwAt her and her husband. The application intended T. 9 have •beetrstibmitted 'on her part this day, but whiOrmust now be postponed till a future opportunity, was, that the Couriqtma allow ht.: to aple;:r at its bar, either personally or by, proxy,;aild then• and hIT appoint a proctor to represent her in this cause. The case was then def.rred. HURD V. Ii 7) AND °TIMIS.: Dr. JENxtn. said, that -Vie deceased in this case, Mr. Hurd, of Tewkesbury, in Gloucestershire, died in the:month of June - . last,. haVing. left behind him a will in an unfinished state, as now propounded. There were several persons who would 'have been entitled in - distribution to his personal pro perty, in case he had. died intestate. They had been cited to . appear in Court in the regular manner, but no appearance had been given for them ; and he should therefore pray the Court to' decree probate to the will propounded, and to admit the pre sent allegation propounding it. He understood there would be no opposition ofFered to the admission of this zilegation. Sir JeittNt Nicifoar. directed that the allegation might be taken as read. lie had carefully perused . it. • But he could not accede to the prayer of Courtsc.l, notwithstanding the circum stances of no appearance given, and no opposition offered. Ho - v vas it possible that the Court could pronounce for the va lidity of the paper in question ? It was quite impossible that it s:iould do so, unless upon a sufficient and very satisfactory statement of facts offered to the Court. The paper concluded in this abrupt manner." And lastly, I give and bequeath all the rest, residue, and remainder of my said personal estate in witness whereof, I have set my hand this--:" This was not a case in which the Court would feel justified to pro nounce for the validity of the instrument, and it must thereftire dismiss the allegation. . Dr. JEN SE R certainly felt unable to contend that this. was a valid disposition of property, under • any - rides of legal pro ceeding ; but 0)2 peculiar circumstances of thecise had induced him to think that such an application might be made without impropriety. The COURT pronounced the deceased t o h ave di e d 'intestate according to the tenour of the evidence at present before it. O'DOGIIERTY V. CARPENTER. This day the long depending cause,respecting- the will of the late Lieut.-Col. .o'Dogherty stood for hearing, when it ap pearing to the Counsel on each side that the proofs adduced in rapport of the will being insufficient to sustain its validity, • it was arranged that,. with leave of the Court, a decree should be taken in favour of an intestacy, each party paying his own costs. Upon which the Judge (Sir John Nicholl) was pleased toob- • serve, that it appeared to him the parties had taken the wisest plan, as he wassonvinced, from what he had read of the evi- dencebpon the coadidit, that the paper could not be supported. That it might also be for the satisfaction of the parties to know, that although he had • not read the whole of the other parts of the : evidence, he had read the greater part of it, and that 'he saw nothing to implicate Mr. eirpenter in the fraud of obtain- •- ing this wilr—if,:;.indeed z any such 'fradd were* committed z 1 ) did not see that he was implicated in it—therefore h e th ou gh t . the party was not to obtain costs as against him. M r . Car penter had done nothing more than his duty in submitting the case to the consideration of the Court under the circumstances atter they arose, and therefore the parties had come to a quite right understanding in allowing a decree to be pronounced against the will, eaen party paying his own costa.