The Sun. — London, England, 1803-07-09 00:00:00

• Lrtnerly well-ptteed confidence of the dov ernor and C.)in e atty , in this tinfottnnate - Centleman had been betrraved by him. Arid he hid, in an evil crobezzled,thiS money to answer tiniortinate sprCo ttiions in the Funds,----he said, %vell.Pactd &Ewe: fur, until this instance, it had ne.'er.been violated ; on;Lif we could not place confidenceio a setVaill wlio had been s .o trusty for 23 years in so great a trait, in Whom was confidence to be piked ?• jt was not; discovered mail the 9th of April follow ing, that any suspicion arose of any. thing ;tulip; ; it W 34 next to...impossible ,that there should be any, as there was no occssion ,to go to the strong-box. Every one knew that that had neycr been eitened, because' the period of pay went of the bills had not arrived, aid therefore no_ 11 was discovered until then. But on the 9th A ; n:1; in consequence of a transaCtion which the Prisoner at the Bar had with Mr. Skit, a loan well versed in besiness, and It very intelligent toan, the mattelecame to light. • lie. knew that Exchequer nnc botight by the Bank, never came 'again , into circulation : but i! letppened that the Prisoner • at the Bar,' on the /6-11 of March, three weeks tatter this emt ezzlement,. made application to Mr. Aiyh to purchase far, him eo,oOol. in the 3 per • cents. Consols, for the opening,_ as it' was teemed : Mr. BiTh thought that a speculation a little too deep, without some t-ecurby against the possible R o deanion of the market, and-therefore objected to CIO et Ing into it, unless the Prisoner at the Bit de. positket with him : , ecority agaiteo,the flunuatiou of the morlzet, anti the securiv he ylttited was to the -amount of 6 per cent. " The Prisoner agreedrii &Inlay Mr. Dish against this possible fluetuatioe, and fiat that ptitiose Ile brought to Mr. Dish three. Exchequer Bills. Portunately for the cause of lie justice, Mr. Dish knew that these Bills had been bold 40 the Bark; and the -circumstance of their having been offered to him considerably alarmed that ti eet i en nan he teas confident there must be some hail prattiee in this matter, because he knew that 'an Exchequer Bib, Once bought by the Bank; never saw the light until the time . arrived for its ; fir they were bought by the Bank for the purpose of accommoda'ring he-Public, and not to be sew again into the Public. Market. lie,. there. fore, immediately informed the Governer and •retiori.of the Bank of this event. Inquiry was matte, and the conduct •of the Prisoner upon this es.asion would he important for the consideration the Jury. . It was from this circum_ . stainer, but that suspicion sluvuld,fall on Mr. Aden, Mr. Newiaed, of the Batik, was referred to, and: he spoke in the preseece of the Ptisoner e and a Di. F rai l . of the, Bank was present also at the time : a • que.-tion wene put to Mr. Newland, in the presence and hearing of the Mater' : the question was this— " Is it pteisible, that an Exchequer Bill, bought by the Bank, can, by any nt , de, afterwards, get into circulation ?" The answer was e .—"Certainly mu; the thin is impossible :" and this Mr., Brook Witt. son,- who was the Magistrate, and isi one of..the lltehoro, knew perfeetly .well. On which the (pi stioti, 4,th-,veat propriety, was repeated to Adett himself; and he said also, " That the thing was abeolutely impossible." At ti te-time the Prisoner at the Aar had deposited three Ex chequer Bills with Mr. Bish, but they Were not given to Mr. 11i,l) as any _payment, but were to C .,l ‘ • in his haedi as a derment. security against t h- ti Hon of the market upon the proposed purchase r , tr the opening ; his attentiort was not so particularly direael to them:as•if they had been made in payment, ' until the time of •ineestigating the hubjett. The Prisoner , was further examined. lie was asked, whether he had not had sortie con. cern in this transaCtion of the F,xchequer Bills de, livered to Mr. Dish ? Ills .answer was—" That he had indeed dire led Dish to purchase Stock, "anti had deposited Exchequer Bills with him, but that he had done it for a friend." Ile was asked the name of that friend. He begged to be excused; .but being pressed upon it, he named- a Mr. Hosier, a Gentleman belOnging to a Banking-base at the other end of the Town. , 'lie said, that these could not be Bank Excheciaere Bills. He looked ,once or wice on - the Baok.bought.book, which was laid before him, and said, he ttlazo certain that the 'Nile Were riot Batik property, that -they were not to be foued it' the bought-hook of the Bank, and if so, beyo d till doubt, they never had been Bank pro perry, for it they had been • Batik property, they rine,t have been in the- Batik bought.heok. The hotetvcr, was tote apparent. An opportunity given" to Mr. Asle;:t to leave the room, and itt an instato an. flomourehle Menet - , who, o f hough he utelei , to.id the nature of business very well, was yet not SO lobiliarly acquainted with it as Mr. Aslet t, looking at the hook, found the tatty Of thele three Bills which Mr. Aslett, a minute be. fore, after loL.king over the book and pretending', • to exantine it, had positively declared that they' WI re not to be found in the book, and that there. • fore they could not he ,any part of the property of. the Bank. It became now impossible for the Direc, toes and Magistrate, in the discharge . of indeed a ienieful but important' and itnpet'ative duty, to avoid .raking measures•by which the person of this unfor. opiate Gentleman was secured. Mr. Gent cow said, he took the liberty to pause• )tote for a moment, and to ask the Jury, under the ditraiun of the wisdom by which they would be Raided from the Bench, in this important trial, Whether they, thought, if. a .security: deposited in the lemse al- a pfivete man, ,unties the care of his confidential servant,,and which without fraud, could .not come before the Public, and supposing it only lit he' the' ease or a common security for money, whether they would not say that its appearing be. lore. the Public was not a case calling aloud for that e:edidential Agent to give an ample: explanation I. en h e . w in s no now speaking of the case or a / Single, I'.x lt"gaier Bill - fur toool. ; he was, speaking of eoo,:000l. worth of them, which the Defendant -hail either issued after they had become the property . of Cr , ' Rank, .or hail in 'his '..own desk put up in an eitvelilpe ready for that ptirpose—et deskenritely own, ef which nobody. but himself had the key, atiLt• amounted to tonoool. worth of Exchequer Bills. To add to this all the other accounts-of 'the Excite. goer Bills of the Bank were exatt•to a petiny e after dim accounting for the estanzzlements lendJnt. f the De- lie then proceeded to observe upon the circum.) stance of the trial having been called On in the course . Of a former Session, and .pLuttponed again without entering at large into the reasons of it.. The season Wai now' come far explanation of that matter . : It was discovered that tVlr. Jennings, a Gerptleman who had been 'appointed by the 1.61di of the 'Treasury; underthe authority of a particular 4ft of Paiiiathent, to sign Exchequer for a time liMited by the Ad, had inadvertently continued to sign them afterwards, although the time limited by the Ad, had expired. It became necessary to make these Exchequer fills valid, notwithstanding that infor mality, because otherwise the Public might 'be alarmed at any till"position that Exchequer hills so signed, were nut legal: accordingly the trial of this Prisoner was postponed until, chat alarm had been removed, for an mt was passed to make these Bills'thus signed, valid to all civil purposes, as if this Cien'tleman (Mr. Jennings) haddiad legal ,autho. riry 'to sign thon ; not that this Mt would ailed this case the one way or . the Other, fur there vas an express'provision worthy of the wisdom and humanity whichgoverned the Legislarute in all c ises, that no ctiininal case ,then depending should be in any degree whatever affeaed, and therefore the law with regard to crimes remained untouched by this remedial Ad of Parliament ; but the Direaors of the Bank, who instituted this-Pro, secution, thought it better that this cause should not be brought forward until all- apprehension was removed concerning the civil legality of these Ex. chequer Bills, and they had accordingly endured their share a the temporary odium which might have attached to putting off the trial without fudy explaining the motives of it ; they did so from mo tives of public policy, in favour of which they sa. crificed their own immediate ease and comfort, and they were'consoled for it by the reiledion that they had - done ,a great public duty : they had however been most unfairly and wantonly misrepresented in their motives in SOME of the publications of the day, on which lie should he glad to hear the an i ma d ver _ siting of the Bench, as well as on the praalce of publishing, the Proceedings of the case of the De. fondant, as it appeared between the time of his cons. mitment and the day of his trial, a practice which he censured highly, and observed, it was not only unfair, inasmuch as it must in its nature he partial, but was utterly repugnant to the principles of that matchless Constitution under which we had the hap piness tolive, for it tended to prejudge, 'and so far prejudice the cause of a man who was en stand upon hiS deliverance, upon a question of life or death. He hoped to see the day when the cause of some mars in Tags, which might he thus prejudiced, would be taken - up, and the Publishers of these mischievous, because partial proceedings, duly punished.. lie apuke from authority when he said, that this was a matter not only to be wished, but to be carried into execution. He was aware that publica t i ons o f t hi s. 'nature had gone forth, in which both the mntives of the Prosecutors, and the case of the Defendant had been grossly misrepresented. He exhorted t h e Jtiry as he was confident they could not be altoge. thee strangers to inch publications; not to allow them any weight in the consideration of th e case stow before th e m ; i t was a case which had, Ito ads milted, great difficulty about it, upon the subjed of the , legality of the Exchequer Bills thus disposed of by . the Unfortunate. Gentleman at' the Bar ; theonly consolation was, that the Jury would be aided by the learning. of the Bench upon that point, .aad if the case was clear, they would be told so . ; if doubt. fill, the matter of law anight be reserved fur the sti. letun decision of all the Judges, who would_con,ider the subjetl fully before they gave any opinion upon it. fteafid not think it necessary for him to say more upon this matter at present, and therefore he now proposed to enter upon proof of the c,ise which he had-opened, after which the Jury would have to pronounce upon it—if they found it to be as he h a d stated, and of which he had no doubt, they would have iudeed a painful duty to perform, but.* from ,which, howeVer, they would not shrink„ but would pronounee•the unhappy Gentleman at the Bar guil ty. If upon the whole case they had any rational doubt of it, he . not roily consented, but intreated that they would give.the Pris Oner the benefit of that doubt, and• acquit him. ,The Prosecutors had no • wishes but to do their duty itilubmitting this mat ter to the determination of a Court i f Justice. The Jury therefore, if they found the case dema n ded i t , would pronounce the Prisoner 'guilty ; but it there remained any doubt upon the case, they would, with more pleasure, pronounce him not guilty. Mr. ERSK INt observed., that upon the statement of this Cave by his Learned Friend, who had open. ed it with humanity and feeling, this was the pro. per season, fur him and his Learned Friends who, with him, were of Counsel for the Prisoner, to call the attention of the Court to the Case alit then stoOdbefore their Lordships ; and without entering into the particulars as opened by hia Learned 'Friend, he would say, that this appeared to hiM to be a'case that was too clean for argument. The Indictment now before the Court, in everycount of it, stated either a secreting or embezzling certain. Exche quei Bills, which brought it to one short plain point, it it deserved that name, and the Court had the MI of Parliament before it, by which the issuing Exchequer Bills, such as the present, was authorized, and also the MI of Parliament , which WAS passed in consequence of the diseolory 61 the infirmity of these Exchequer Bills, and to con stitute them legal Exchequer Bills. In the AO of Parliament which gave the authority to issue Ex. chequer Sills, such as those now stated, the poWer of so issuing them was confined to a limited time,_ There was no power given even to the Lords of the Treasury to issue ExChequei . Bills, except by Mt otParliament that - theie Bills were chile' ,Exchequer Bills according to At of Parliament, of they •were nothing. Here he tead the provision of the - Mt of Parliament under which Exchequer Bills could issue at the time this case happened, - which emitted,- 0 ! That a - number , of Exchequer Bills should issue fur any limn or sums of money not ex-. ceeding five'roillions, in the like manner, forth and order, and subjea to the like rules and direttions, a; LONDON: Priiltetl 1:111:11ANAN WMILLAN, (of I - lbw-Street, Crivent-Garden); ani At the Surr.OFrlcs, No. 122 1 Strand; where AtivertitePtentr, Order: in and by an Alt of Parliament (reciting another Apt), provided Ili Ways, that rite, such Exchequer Bill shall and may be signed oy the Auditor of His Majesty's Exchequer, ,or by some person in . , his name, duly .anthurized to sign the 3ame, with the approhatiou of the Lords ComMiisitiners of the Treasury, in writing under Omit - hinds, or by any three or more, of them." Ntiw, it was .admitted, that although. Mr. , Jennings, ~who, signed these papers called Exchequer sills , had authority to si gn Exchequer Bills in the year 1799, yet that his authority did not extend beyond the li mitstion of the At Of 1799 ; • but it happened by omissiOnor accident, without any fault in any body, this power had not been given to Mr. Jennings on the two last occasions of issuing Exchequer Bills, or rather, on iastiing those pieces of paper called Exchequer .Bills : they were not such, they were not what they were described to he in Ahe ment—they were not Exchequer Bills,lhey were not Government Security for the payment of money under the authority of Parliatnent,they were, in fad, nothing at all of which their Lordships could take notice in a Court of: justice,. ne, really thought, that , to endeavour to argue a thing that was clearwithout argument, was to run the risk of clouding it.; 'llia t was most likely to be the case when a difficulty was assumed where none .existed. He, thought he should very ill express the resped he had for the learniog of the Bend', it helvere to la_ boor this as a doubtful point. It was f o r -the Le - giAlature to express what constituted an Exchequer Bill ; it . might direci that it should not be signed at t il, or dist It should be' signed by the Auditors; or it might give a particular form to, or to have no form for them hut if it gave,a particular form to them, and that form was not observed,,l3i)ls with out. such form "could, not he called Exchequer Bills. It was .true that the-Public did not suffer from this, for there was an Ad of Parliament, to cure the in': formality 'of these Bills ; but by that AB,,Pailia.: anent itself had declared that which would settle this matter beyond all doubt, aild to argue the mat. ter after that, appeared to him to be preposterous. The security to the Public Creditor, the. Holder of Exchequer Bills, was made entire by remedying the &le& of theie Bills, anti she Aa had 'declared that Mt. Jennings had signed these. Bills, And then ceeded to state, that " whereas the authority of the sail - Robert jenniow'was omitted to be sign anti notwithstanding he ' continued to then as With authority extended to all Exchequer Bins, and had not been confined to such Exchequer Bills' as specified in the said Mt" (the Mt of 17991 — Here was a Legislative declaration on this very Case—" And whereas the Public have -had the be, nefit of the. money so issued, &c. Be it therefore ermaed, that for 'MI civil purposes, contracts, and• engagetnents.",—Civi/ purposes—Then came the humane provision of the Legislature whiCh did it so much honour, and which was consistent with the l'rinciplea of the 'British Government,:which ,was, that oothing, in ,the Act should affea the case of any per-on whatever charged with any crime; for it stated, " Provided always, that this Mi shall not extend, or be construed to .extend, to the case of any prisoner now charged with, any crime,"' &c. After this Mt of Parliament, it was impossible to say that this Case could be made, to affeil the Pri soner. It could not. affect him before this Aeli for. the Legislature had , declared these Bills a nullity before the last Mt, anti it could not aked him by the akEtior that the Ad itself expresslyprohibited. His Case then was this, that these papers called in the Inditlment Exchequer Bills," were to all in tents and purposes invalid, that they were not cheqeer Bills, according to the provision of any law existing at the time they were Issued. lie had , no more to say to men of such learning as those he had now the honour of addressing ; it would not be consistent. with the reaped he had for them, if : he were to say more upon this topic he-must, bow-. ever, be allowed to express his cordial concurrence, witli his Learned. Friend in t very thing be . had said in, behalf of the Gentlemen of the Bank, who had Upon this, as upon every.decaslon, acted in a manner that . did them hohour ; and if any thing had been pub. fished to the contrary, every discerning man. anibng the whole Public know it to be false. Mr. Setjeant B,EsT•spoke on: the same side, and quoted the Acts of Parliament in suppOrt of it. Mr. GAIRROW admitted the case to have much difficulty in lc He admitted that as to the Public these Bills . were not to all intents and ptirposes Ex ,,chequer Bills, but he submitted they were Exche quer Bills with regard . to the Prisoner at the Bar. He compared this to a.case of the. forgety.ola Bill, of Exchange, which was oble4ted to because-it was not stamped—now this would not have-hcen good, for the recovery of a,debt of fol. and was declared' mat tat be available in any Court of Justice, .Bte. and yet it had been held to, be forgery; so in this case, although these Bills were not- !WI- Exchequer Bills as to the Public, yet with regard, to a , person who committed a criminal act with them, they might be. so denominated. Mr EttatorrE Contended that these Ripen caned , Exchequer Bills were not 'Exchequer Bills., at al1.• As to Mr. Jennings, who was Mr. Jennings A very deserving Officer under Government, no' doubt, but whose authority to sign Exchecoer Bills expired With the Mt of 1799, and therefore these Bills in - question, • signed' by him, were the sane as if they had .not been signed at all, since he had nu power. to sign them. The CHI EP BARON of the Excn EQU a It observed, that as to the case put t . )k-Mr. GARRow, where', man had been convicted of Forgery of a Bill of Ex change upon unstampt paper, did n apply to the present, fur there -the thing charged was _forging one thing with intent to represent 'another, and it mattered not how unskilfully that attempt 'was made,. it might have been more ateicieriatS'if there had been a stamp upon : the-Paper, and . inure likely to succeed, yet the crime would have keen the same; but the charge here was, that the Prisoner umbezzied and secreted, and ran away, &e. with certain Exehe_ quer these Papers could not he so denothi. That an offender of this description stiOutd .escape p un i s hment was lint a small sacrifice in thead ministration of justice, compared ro•the advantages attending the regular adMinistration of it, which wob!‘l 1 e an answer t i thoe who might l,ok at the en,:tmity of the mischief, withow looking at the greater evil that would result from ! , e : nding the ru:c, of law to answer the circumstances of a partic..lar case. The subscription of Mr. Jen nings to the in question was no subscription at, all, nor would those Bills be valid in a Court of Law for any Civil purpose, until the ACI of Perlis. mcnt passed to remedy their defett. This had no analogy to the case of a forgery. All indiaments. for forgery swat that the thing 'in question was not what . it purported to be, and whether, •Siampt or unstamio, 'made no difference, because the thing itself would be eqnally 'false in, either case ; bnt, here it was positively averred that the, .Prisoner at the - Bar. had committed. certain .ads of 'felony on . certain xchequer Bills, whereas they were not Exchequer Bills, for which reason his Lordship was of opinion that the objeCtion was solid. Mr. justice ROOK R and Mr. Justice .I. 4 AW EN" agreed With what fell fr om the CH 11l BARON. Upon which the CHIEF BARON direaed the PI ao Arguit the Prirom'ei----and he was according ae. (pitted urs eight or ten indiarnents for various EP chequer'Bills, which were•aiLdrawn in one way. Mr. GAR RO W .observed, that although the,Cri' urinal Justice of the Country had been defeated this case, yet, the Civil Justice of the Country_ te pained to be put in force : he therefjie, indved That the Prisoner be nOw remanded to-answer ft a Ds:bt of 200,6001. The Cours•ordered the Prisoner to be • retnattilf and he was remanded accordingly. 4] I! • f , 'r , John Bake and Catherine Corr:oily were. tile fur the wilful murder of Ei:z tbzth Connolly to t l 6th of June; of which cti,ne they were azquittel The phinf.ir Grand Spefficie of the. Black Fa we understand will be laid aside after Mn,o ~ evening next; the merits of silk Piece hive prol a great ateraOtioo, we aria a thtrefure' sorry.ce lutii that the Public will lootl , I 0 s e it, - But we cuojcetiq that that step It-twill .nor have. -Imcn tait-!n.! , y t -Manager, . had; there not been _mat ter equatly. as' traktive, and yerhaps own: powerfully so, :ii r 4 0.511 speakilighli 9f "hat lie h:ts'.now. in rehearsal. ' PRICE UL YLVit SIR JAMES Published by IV tt-LI AM AR mtc Sea irPs, (o f Satoh Moltrtn.street, (:rosvel:+4 - -squirci; rgr . the Patrr, Letter; for the Editor,- Scc.(polt-pard), :Twit be acidic' ted. RDAY. Bank procic •Irutia Stock shut ti sY~ per Cent. Ssit, • 1 idia 119ric6 pur s. dis. per Len , . tltr, 9,)i • xcheq. s. s. I rish; ,us.. per Cent. °Valium 4i_ d 4. ;.er fr-Cili t Coll. 701 69170 pct t. 539,- 4 ; 3 ! )er C. R. 5514 4 1 . Ditto AOll. 30 9 15-16 3 per C. Con. S.;¢ y 4l • Danklor 1 tay Ace. R uk 1.. Ann. for Opert. 0611 S w Ditto Short 1 . MARRIOTT. - - . 1 CAPITAL. FREEI - 10L.1) MANsioN; pty;AsURE CROUNI)S..and FARMS, ESSEX. . TO BE SOLD lII' AUCTION, - Bk. Mr. stiuT FLEwolt.ll-1, I . At Carraway's Collse—Housi , , COinhill,' Same time. his Mouth, of which Notice wilt DC given , •.8y Order at the Executors itd Truster.;, .. Togther,, or in Lots, as may be t.lought must ell !hie. l'I" , 1:::3$ acceptable oilers are male in the incrii time by r l i" lg i Contract, -1:1 - .1E MANOR, or ,It - EUTED MANOR, o f . . • T Iv I N ST E O. with the SZ.ht-reno.and !ni -1 . munities, bekmeing to tb. samer,:toother with :he thllowiog Ivery valuable Est:lt, CUITI1?1 - 011g tagtalle; donut 7' . 1.. ACICOt the Residence of • " • !Sit' JAMES MARRIOTT. Dcreascd, Late judge's( the High Cent Adinirat ty. &e...5:c.. vl O T.W . INBTIr D HAI.L,a truism. lic:►tants sp.n.*.,n4 Itriansion, presenting thrct: of a neat stih: ut Mchiredure, decorated' with hitildsome stone pil pilasters, with enriched capitals and „ornaments ot Codt e ' Manufacture ; 'coirtinanding a and !eti,•:‘ in the centre of beatitifist and extnisive ing - SlirhYmies, disPOsed taste an i jintAineitt. fat Of' r r And . ilbellf4 huiciatibrct . all kl)e inost.j!,ll: tureStine,.ltixuilanr, and i'aried,prospect.,, over:a highil",, tivatesl.aud romantic Country r; the distance trans Miles, frint Halstead six, and front Sudbury tive, w 1 , 11 ';" Borough, the lute erninealt• Proprieter.representedin't W 4) L a ' a 'laments. The Mansk4 cnotains - excellent airy Rcd - Servantb', rooms, Dry ; 3ing-closets, a nd every desiratlne vcnicri curl aceciattmhlati6n • alf - elegant Shit of lirinci Apar;twats,.spacious ; two liandsonte.paved Lit! trance- and a must .cornplete alid extensive arratii",:, ment of 'Attached awl Detached. 'Domestic °dim ; cao. arched Wine, Beer,- and Coal Cellars ; OroductiVe. Gardens, inclestxt with lofty Walls ' cloathed with fine I t u g. 'fret.;, Fish-Pond s , Orchard, &c. &c. The House is seated about Mile ftiim the surrounded by about 23n Acres of renu rkame rids land, Acts of which are tin iVing Woods, .allbriiing a mast exctli', lent, cover ter Gime, with which the Country abettudi,' interse6ted with delightful rural W4ks. With 1 large (w . - tsched Cottage or Ste war d' s H o use, caßital Farm - and R, l " Yards, barns, Co kit, and Cart-lod C : ges, tatding. ‘-' 1 " House. Gr3n3ry, and Out-Buildings of every description. Also the riAlowing coinpuel Farins—Losh /louse, conlini'' sing ye Acres; Bali's, 84 Acres ; NOltes'g'; 4 Acres; 47 Acres;' Twinsted-1 tail Lodge, 139 Acres ; Catley to 7 Acres.; 4rid Lortyli's, 58 Act - es, or excellent Meadow, Pasture, flop, and Wood-Land, lying, with ; 114 1 triAing exceptions, within a Ring-fence, and in the state of Cum ; with large Farm• Houses, Y irds, and Out-Building;, part in Hand, and the reniati, 1 -* tier on Lear, at ik,:litsiunounting . to TAvo,itti N 111) and NIN ET Y-ON.E POUND - Ss.. per A rnuun May be vitr‘ , ed with only, which, with Parties" tars, may Le hal u the xcetitcrs Trustees, the ej* Robert Gray, at Twinsted- I all ; and Mr. Nletiduk."" No. 6, I tolborn-„Cout i k, Gray's ; and of Mr. Shuttle worth, No. 17., Austin-I;par., near tile Royal EXch-" Where Plans ot thc ENtilics mly ne -been. - • Printed ParticitLirs will, also.. he delivered 20 days preirio l . 3 ,. to the. Sale, at thzGenrKejlalitead ; Rose and,Crown, Sr".' l bury ; Whitt Hart, Braintree ; Boh Chelmstl - rd Liari.,way••• ; and tun York black-W.ol' SIIIP NE33. CIZAVF.SEND, jirt.);• 7. . . - Passed by —ibc; 1. 7 it pil;•:)slua, - - Sririze), YrOM st. 1)(jM16!"1 go; Ceres . , DAvilison; train Memel ; liustra, -----, 114.)in Nola, way ; Vrow SL.e.., -:----, "nom Emtxten ; Crorloic, ---I'.. from. Stoc'khotui ; Vrow Prenitz Vretterick,,—., front ~. Norway ; Gra.;e,_ I'cm - cc, flout i ncone; Vrow A li.ht, --- '7l from Bremen; Ceres, k crown, ..and Augusta, Weilcl, (rout Stettin.• - ,';, Sailed—the Industry, Ingraham, and Hoop, Wait yclli to New-lurk. MARRIED. ~ . .. On Thursday., at Waltharnstow, by the Rev. Williat* Sparrow, Mr. iVillianpßedtord, of Ilitehni, liens, to'6lis.T Elizabeth Bedford, daughter of Willi,,itt Bedford. Esq..., 'late sane day, at Ethh, by the 'Rev. or. Whiter ill r • lame; Dentpster, of Baron liouAe; Mitchant. lo 'NI ts • . 13 "' duce, ivittow . of the late . 'oho Bunciech, 17',.q. of Al itchani• .:._=-,'- DIED. 91Thorsdayt*rnaming, of an apoplexy, Samuel ?lattilto Esq. late of the Island at Tortola. I OL'A::),