The Sun. — London, England, 1821-08-10 00:00:00

r THE LONDON JOURNALS. ,DAILY EXTRACTS 1 , 11.0 M VIE MORNING PAPERS. August 10. [THE TIMES.] The only private Information received yester -07 on the affairs of Turkey was contained in let ilera of the 25th - ult. from Trieste. An Austrian Tes3el had arrived there from Smyrna with fugi tives. The cause of the Greeks was understood to be declining in the Dflorea; but it had acquired strength in. Romelia, and was becoming ex tremely formidable to the Turkish power io that quarter. This latter circumstance eu courages the hope of the preservation of peace. — Letters of the 20th ult., which arrived yesterday from Su Petersburgh, are silent on the question of war with Turkey. The communications with Odessa had been facilitated by the establishment of a post three times a week instead of twice, and orders had been issued for appointing a packet-boat 'to sail regularly between Odessa and Constantinople. [MORNING POSTj More forbearance, we find, is necessary to it.eep our resolution not to be drawn again into the discussion of the past, than we had antici pated. We really thought that the wish of bu rying all asperities and divisions in one common grave was not confined to ourselves - . We did not think it possible that there should be English- , men desirous of perpetuating differences inju rious to the tranquillity, the mora's, and the character of the country, when the object that gave them birth had ceased to exist. We ap pealed to common feeling aad to patriotism — but we appealed to a quarter where common feeling was dead and patriotism yet unborn. We held out the hand of peace—but it was to those who would have no peace. W e laid down and offered to break our sword— but. let not the enemies of order triumph, that sword is not yet broken. They think us self disarmed, and therefore strut valorously for ward, abuse on their tongue, and menace in their eye. But let them beware ; we can still repel abuse, and outface menace. Though we abstain from the ground on which they so irreverently trample, we can still reach them through other paths. Before they venture too far, let them examine themselves, and consider whether they really possess invulnerability. We may be thought, perhaps, to speak mysteries ; but we know that in certain quarters those mysteries mill be as clear as the light of day. We know that some of those who are most loud in their praises of asserted innocence, and most unjust in their abuse of the men who honestly spoke their sentiments when it was both painful and dangerous to speak them,--we know that those new Candidates for the honours of Radicalism and the sceptre of Faction, will perfectly understand us when we ask them who, before and during the pro gress of a most decided and unmitigated convic tion of the guilt of the person then under trial 'We know that if they please, they can supply the public with the word of the riddle. But we know too that they will not please to do it. Re gard for consistency may prevent them. Let them enjoy their consistency—it would be cruel s to deprive them of so scanty a commodity. One would not rob a beggar of his mite : but then let the beggar behave as he ought. Let him disguise himself if he likes, but let him be neither impu dent nor abusive; for although we might disdain• to ransack his pockets, we might feel no com punction whatever in putting him in the stocks. [NEW TIMES.] The Times of yesterday makes a disclosure which cannot fail to excite equal pity for the un fortunate Queen, and detestation for thOse by whom she was misled. Her Majesfy,it seems, on One occasion, during her last illness, was express ing herself with much despondency. Who the Persons were that she addressed does not appear; probably Mr. Alderman Wood was. among the number ; bti.t. the Editor, after mentioning her. declaration, that she " did not wish to live," continues in the following' remarkable manner:— " It was observed, that she desponded too much, that Public Opinion was in her favour, and would make her amends for all her sufferings. Her Majesty asked What PUBLIC OPINION Lad done for her ! !' It was answered, that it had defeatdd that late dreadful attempt to ruin her, the Bill of Pains and Penal ti €1;. Her reply was prompt and firm-- What am I the better for the failure of that Bill? If it had passed, I should have been degraded ; and WHAT IS MY SITUATION NOW r" ft is not in the power of Language more strongly to de'pict the shame; the - vexation, the heart-rending mortification which this unhappy Lady_ must have felt, on discovering that factious and interested men liad deluded her to her ruin. Public Opinion ! Oh ! Yes, the lying oracle's:of Dk Timds had- over and over again promised miracles to her Majesty' from the power of public Opinion—they had declared that this mighty power Was at 'their dispose, and that they 4 4 would bring the Queen through." land these is no denying the fact--they did by an unprecedented system of intimidation and calumny, cause the failure of the Bill of Pains and Penalties. But of what avail NC S' this to the restoration of lost honour ? The painful discussions had taken place. The evidence remained upon record. The jUdg- Meta of every individual was wade up ; and the fatal deciSion of St. Omer's had converted that into history, which might otherwise have remain ed for ever.among vague doubts and inconclusive sermises. The Queen was persuaded to come to England, and thus to force into publicity what her best friends, the friends of decency, and or der, and public peace, would have smothered up in the shades of privacy and retirement. [moltNUM CHRONICLE.] The malady which has sheltered her Majesty from all future care and suffering, is not, we have good authority • for believing, of recent origin. This unfortunate Princess has been more than once attacked by 'the sante disease, and about two years ago, When she resided at Pesaro, it assumed so alarming an appearance, that the Rhysicians,_ during a period of three days',• were in momentary expectation that the result. would trove fatal. Whatever, however, may appear to , • have been either -the remote or the proximate cause of this mela . ncholy event, prudence dictates that, if possible, it should be ascertained, as it may involve many important questions ; and it is quite reasonable to assume, in vindication of such a pro ceeding, that had it been compatible with those humane feelikg - S which the Physicians IN ho attended tier Majesty are known tp possess, or agreeable to the established code of medical ethics, to 'reason with the Royal Patient upon the propriety of a measure which good sense would sanction, and the anxious solicitude of the people at large would almost induce 'them to demand, little doubt can be entertained that the Queen would have yielded her own persOnal feelings of delicacy, and have consented to an in spection, which must prove satisfactory to l!er friends, and conducive to general tranquillity. [BRITISH PRESS.] We should lament very much if the intelli gence of the Queen's demise were to prevent the King from pursuing his intended voyage to Ire land, should it reach his Majesty before his de parture from Holyhead ; or were to cause him to return prematurely, should he not be apprised of the melancholy ?vent ❑ntil after his arrival in Dublin. The extensive preparations that have been made by the people of Ireland to greet the coming of their King in a manner befitting his rank. and. their own character, prove the earnest ness and sincerity of their joy at the pro mised favour. All distinctions of party and of religion, which have hitherto distracted that countryl have merged into one generous and universal glow of affectionate loyalty ; and without a paradox it may be truly said, that Ireland, in the midst of her present anxious agi tation, enjoys a degree of tranquillity to which the people have long been strangers. The pro mise of the King's visit—of the only British King who has ever been known to approach the shores of, Ireland with feelings of paternal re gard, has already produced the most beneficial results; old differences have been adjusted, feelings of irritation have subsided, the calm of peace has superseded the angry conflict of opinions, and the two great contending parties have already begun to regard each other with such kindly feelings of mutual respect, that, should old differences be once more revived, it may be hoped that they . - will never be accompanied by the fierce spirit of animosity which lately distinguished them. gut the good work is only commenced, and awaits the, actual presence of the King to complete it. It would therefore be little short of a national calamity, if his Majesty were prevented by any circum stances from effecting the great purpose of his present expedition. Besides, why should his Majesty return to London or to Brighton upon receiving the intelligence of the Queen's decease? Is not his Majesty as much at home in one part of his dominions as in any other, for the pur poses at least 6f a momentary retreat from the bustle' of amusement or business ? It would, be idle to talk about the probability of the King's feeling any particular sorrow upon re ceiving the news of his Queen's death. Their Majesties never enjoyed the opportunity of mutually appreciating by experience the good qualities of each other; their union was accom panied by none of those circumstances which might now give a bitterness to the moment of final separation, and his Majesty cannot be e4s pected to feel one pang more upon the dissolu tion of his Royal Consort. than he might be sup posed to experience upon receiving intelligence of, the death of any ordinary acquaintance. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. STATE OF THE ODDS. .BETTING-ROOM, AUG. 9 - DONCASTER ST. LEGEIt. 5 to 2 agst Gustavus 14 to 1 agst - Fortuna 7 to 1 agst Jack Spiggot 16 to 1 agst Champagne 7 to 1 agst Vingt-un 16 to 1 agst Statesman 10 to 1 agst Sandbeck 26 to 1 agst any other. GRAND DUKE MICHAEL ' S STAKES. 3to t agst Reginald I 6to 1 agst Prophet 4to 1 agst Ibla I 7to 1 agst Charcoal. NEWMARKET ST. LEGEIt. 2to 1 agst Augusta ' I 2to 1 agst Reginald. LUTON LEES RACES—(2d DAY)—Auo 6. Ladies' Plate of 501. ; three yrs old, Bst. 41b;; four, Bst. 101 b.; five, 9st. ; and aged, 9st. 61b.—Heats. Mr. Rogers's Fortunio, 4 yrs old . . . 51 1 Captain Granger's c. by Sorcerer . . . 12 2 Mr. Luff's Sir Benjamin . • • . . 23 d: Mr. Goddard's Thunderbolt, aged . . . 44 dr Mr. Mr. Milne's b. m. Maria . . . . .3 dr Six to 4 agst the Sorcerer colt, 2 to 1 agst Fortunio ; after the second heat, 2tol bn the winner—a fine rac?. The 107,s Sweepstakes did not fill. Farmers' Stakes of lOgs each, 6 subscribers, for horses not bred. Mr. Luff's Ge-ho Mr. Pratt's Fickle Five started, three bolted the Course. The return INIATen of CRICKET between the Cambridge And Bury Clubs took d ace on Monday and Tuesda y . last at littsf, and .was dee:4CA in fur of the latter by a majority of '4B runs. RUlt Y. ht Inns 2d Ditto CAMBRIDGE. -148 Ist inns . 4B 2d Ditto A CRICKET MATCH was played on tl - elst inst. at Ickleton, between eleven playars of that village and eleven amateurs of the game from Cambridge, which was won by the former.— The day was spent with the utmost conviviality and harmony. —State of the game:— lc XL ET ON CAMBRIDGE AM Inns 154 lst Inns 4B 2d ditto 67 2d ditto GENUINE INSTANCE OF BM/ N DEIIING.—At a late fair at Ballinasloe, a rich grazier, being in It's cups, made a boast that he and three other pot companions had contrived to swallow sixteen bottles of port at one sitting. " Pray Sir," said a gentleman present, " would you have the good ness to give us the names of the three other brutes that were engaged with you ?" 64 That I will," says he ; 44 There was Tom Matthews, that's one ;—the two Grogans, that's two ;—mvself, that's three; —and (after a long pause)—Why, .by my soul there were four of us. Let me see (reckoning upon his fingers,) there's the two Grogans, that's one;—myself, that's two ;—Tom Matthews, that's three;—and (by the Lord I forget the name of the other,)—but I know that thete were four of us any how." FOREIGN LITERATURE. (No. XXXIII.) TRAITE DES PAPIERS PUBLICS, i. e. A Treatise on the Public Papers, in which it is shewn that the Charter does not authorize the Journals, &c., by J. A. GAY, mem ber of the Antient Faculty of Medicine of Montpellier.-Byo. Paris, 1821. It seems that Dr. GAY is determined to carry on a war of extermination against •the French Journals. He attacked them with great warmth in 1819, when the measure of the Censorship was proposed and carried, in the French Cham bers, and he attacked them with equal fury very recently, in the work which forms the subject of the present article, when the Censorship on the French periodical publications was prolonged to the next Session of the French Chambers. I should like to know what offences the Journals have committed against Dr. GAY ? and by what crime, or rather by w hat article, they have pro voked his rage ? Can he accuse them of having injured his medical reputation ? Alt! if such a charge was well founded, they would find in their own consciences severer judges than Dr. GAY himself : and, following the example of FENELON, who burnt one of his mandates which the Sove reign Pontiff had disapproved, they would in stantly convert into expiatory ashes the offend ing sheets. But let us hear what Dr. GAY has to allege against them. ." I have written," Nty : s he, " A Treatise against Blood-letting ; Resistance on the part of Physicians and Journalists ;" the crime would certainly be a very serious one, but we, the Jour nalists, have not certainly committed it. The Phy sicians are guilty, but we are innocent ; besides, what interest have we in this dispute ? Whether Dr. Gay writes for or against blood-letting, how can that concern us ? and shall we, for a few blood-lettings, more or less, harrass an honest man, and especially a Physician ho possesses -knowledge and skill ? The supposition is con trary to all probability. That the physicians should have attacked the antiphlebotomical doctrine of Dr. Gay we can easily imagine ; it was their business : bat igno rant as we are of the art of medicine, though good patients, did it become uslo offer an opi nion on 'a question of thigimportance ? " Ought we to bleed or not to bleed in apoplexy ?" Would not people have a right to say to us, what are you meddling with ? Talk of politics, for you really speak very well on that subject, but do not touch on medicine, —that to you is pro hibited ground. We hay.e fortunately avoided this folly.' Dr. Gay published his Treatise against Blood-letting, and the Journalists, very properly, confined their labours to an exposition of the author's ideas : I.ot one of themeven remarked that Hippocrates, the divine Hippocrates, was of a contrary opi nion, that he resorted to blood-letting on all oc casions, and that he was decidedly favourable to this remedy. Such was our discretion r and we were led to hope that Dr. Gay would have duly appreciated it; but it is precisely since we have been so discreet that he has sworn our ruin. Two years and upwards have not been able to produce more amicable feelings towards us, and he wishes the Journals as much harm in 1821 as "he did in 1819. '.17 - rtirrlione to prove that he belongs to the sect of humorists .2 The proof is good enough, but we could have done very well without it; for the Treatise against Blood-letting put it beyond a doubt. I grant that all which now passes in the world, with respect to medical treatment, is little cal culated to please Dr. Gay, but he ought to know that we cannot prevent it. Is it our fault that he sees, for some - time past, a system gaining ground, the very opposite of his own ?‘ Is it our fault, if, as the Journals have lately announced with great truth, five hundred and sixty thousand more leeches have been used in 1820 than in any preceding year ? and lastly, is it our fault if blood-letting was never so much practised as since Dr. Gay endeavoured to chew the serious evils attending it ? All this has taken place without our assistance, and would have occurred in spite of us. Why then, when the Physicians alone are guilty, does Dr. Gay attack the Jour nalists ? Why, instead of applying for the sup pression of leeches, does, he apply for that of the Journals? But doubtless we shall not be con demned without being heard, and we shall have no difficulty in proving that the reasons advanced by Dr. Gay in support of his request are weak edeed. According to his account, the Journals are not 1 authorised by the charter. What a paradox !' But charters are not framed, I think, that we may have journals, and journals-are not published only for the maintenance of charters. I remark it without vanity, that they are under great obli gations to us. We give them life and action. Without us would they exist ? Dr. Gay is there fore in the wrong. Journals come within the charter, at least so they are considered. If they are shut out °fit, truly it would be a fine day's Can any one conceive a representative govern ment unless its proceedings be made public ? Dr. Gay has felt the full force of this argument, he therefore admits the publication of its acts, but rejects that of its discussions; for he is certain that the representative form of government was never devised in order that we might discuss every thing from morning to night. The pub licity of its acts is important, but a constitutional state wishes ,something more. It imagines that if the government alonespoke, certain points might not be sufficiently explained. In short, such is the nature of a representative government, that it cannot tolerate soliloquies. Dr. Gay informs us that there are in Europe two Ministers, whom he names, of the same opi nion as himself respecting the journals. This surprises me not a little ; but instead of two had there been two hundred, I should not consider myself as beaten, and would say to him what an interlocutor, in the Provincial Letters, said to his adversary, who heaped monk upon monk in sup port of his opinion : " But my good Sir, monks 4 ! are not reasons." The authorities quoted by Dr. Gay are certainly very respectable, especially on the point in question, and no person holds them in greater respect than I do ; hut is not a good argument of much greater value ? I am very glad, however, to find that Dr. Gay is not singu lar in his opinion respecting the publicity of dis cussions, and that he has for supporters those persons to whom this publicity is naturally dis- agreeable. If, from excess of generosity, I should concede that this publicity is dangerous, would he then stand on higher ground ? In politics, as well as in medicine, there are disorders which are very, difficultoot to say impossible, to cure, and which exercise the skill, too often in vain, of the most able physicians. Such is, I am afraid, that of which Dr. Gay has undertaken the treatment. Besides they have called him in too late, and all the remedies proposed by him want, if not energy, at least opportunity. La Fontaine, a much more profound politician than is generally imagined, said to the pastors of the human race, and not of sheep, " Make use of your nets. Power does every thing." Dr. Gay gives in the present day the same advice ; but the pastors of the human race, especially the constitutional pastors, will find it difficult to fol• low his advice. The spirit of the age has enlarg ed excessively the meshes of their nets ; and, whether right or wrong is not a point I am re quired to examine, our representative govern. molts seem formed to restrict this power which does every thing. Suppose Dr. Gay were to visit a patient who had lost the use of his legs, and should say to him : " Walk, walk, the legs do " every thing."—" Ah ! Doctor," he would reply, " enable me fixst to make use of them :'there lies " the rub." It is precisely the same with the power who did every thing. It cannot do so now ; and it is only lost labour to recommend energetic measures when it is impossible to carry them into execution, and which moreover frightens little minds. It is bound, and closely too; for a representative government ties up the hands rather tightly. Let Dr. Gay cut the knot, then this and still more energetic advice may be given. But we are reasoning on another hypothesis; and the prin ciple once admitted, the consequences must fol low,—publicity of discussions, the tribune, and the 'journals, especially the journals which for tunately for, them are authorised by the charter; for if they were not, 1 suspect Dr. Gay would refuse them its sanction. Notwithstanding the- great liberties he has taken in his pamphlet, he does not the less con sider us as very formidable Sovereigns. Our power, if we are to believe him, has no limits. Every thing trembles before it. Yet we know that this very terrible power most frequently ex pires, at the doors of our offices ; and two steps beyond them, no person will acknowledge it. Poor Sovereigns are we! , It is not the same with our decrees as with those of Dr. Gay, to which men must submit, and sometimes at the risk of their lives. Our subjects, less tractable than his patients, treat us.very cavalierly, and never are of our opinion, except when we think as they do. But as other Sovereigns besides ourselves are, in the present day, liable to the same vexa tion, we submit to it without a murmur. We are very easy respecting. our regal rights, and are tolerably. good Princes, whatever Dr. Gay may say; and if more proof were. wanting to shew how ge;itly we exercise our royal authority, and how little it is dreaded, we refer to the Doctor's Treatise on the Public Papers, in which we are treated very irreverently. Dr. Gay urges besides the suppression of the Journals; people never take this liberty with any powers snail after, in. point of fact, they have ceased to exist. It is well known that the abdi cation of a late Emperor was not voluntary, but .forced from him. He was the`f► no longer able to shew his power, for up to that time the French respected him, and found even in him, I know not how, a certain air of legitimacy. What then must be thought of the power of Journalists, whom Dr. Gay represents as so formidable, of that pen, which is a sceptre of ... ? Ah ! poor power! poor sceptre! You attack, says Dr... Ga y. to us, and you do not suffer any reply to be made to you. I have before observed, that we did not attack Dr. Gay ; and can he be so ignorant as not to know that the journalists are -on such good terms, that it is quite enough to be attacked by one of them, in order to be defended by another. If, there fore, D r . Gay, whom we all esteem, could not find, in what he calls our empire, a single cham pion, it was owing to the general impression that the subject which he was discussing ought to be decided elsewhere, and it consequently be came necessary to pass to the order of the day. The Revjews dedicated to medicine were the only fields of battle which could be opened to him : in then► his natural judges attacked. him, and through the same channel, therefore, ought he to have defended his doctrines. What business had he to meddle with us ? There is not one of our readers who would not rather be blooded every morning, and copiously too, .than be condemned to read a dissertation, let it be ever so learned', pn. the dangers of phlekotomy. • Lastly, and 1 inlreat Dr. Gay to weigh well this consideration, his doctrine not having been well received by his colleagues, it was certainly an act of prudence On our parts to be silent. We wish to be on good terms with the faculty, and we should not like, for the sake of one of its members, to embroil ourselves' witl► the remain der. They say it might be attended with seri ous consequences. Dr. Gay brings several other heavy charges against us ; among others, that we are the authors of discord in families, respecting which I leave his readers to form their judgments. They will decide whether weare so black as he represents us. He thence concludes, that the Journals ought to be immediately suppressed, except that which is published by authority. Then the pas sions will be allayed. Every official Journal is sedative ; and when that shall, be the only one read, if indeed it is worth reading, pe►►ce will reig►► on earn►. "It is folly," says Dr. Gay, " to fear it will be used as an extinguisher, and " unnecessary to add . that I am not an .enemy to " liberty of speech." You hear : Dr. Gay per mits you to speak. Profit by the concession he has granted to you, but do'not - abuse it. Yet we, more generous than Dr. Gay, we al low him not only to talk, but also to write ; and, as he writes Well, we will read Ms works with pleasure, even though he should write against the Journals. It becemes hirn to consi der whether it is not more for - his interest than their's to come to a reconciliation with them.--= He has already enemies enough : and to attack at the same time three powerful bodies—Physi cians; Blood letters and JournalWS, is a proof of greater courage than of prudence. Such at leaSt is the advice of a Journalist. THE ASSIZES; CHELMSFORD, AUG. 13. --- HAYWARD, ESQ. QYI TA I, ir.. . This was an acticin upon the Statute of Anne, against the de fendant, to recover a penally of 51. for keeping a dog for thi purTose of killing gaine,,not being duly qualified. The plaintiff': case was conducted by Mr. MARRYATT sad Mr. JEssor, and the defendant's by Mt. GURNEY and .Mr. The plaintiff was stated to be a Gentleman of landed property at Haveril, in this county, and' the defendant a considerable landholder in his neighbourhood, in the parish of Helion 'Bum sted. The facts proved against the defendant were, that be kept a setter bitch and two puppy pointers in his house. About vita years since, he had used the setter for the purpose of killing game ; but front that time to this, there was no proof that he hr..d ever used the dog, except for the purpose of taking it out now and then for a little air and exercise. In other respects it was only used as,a house dog. The question was, whether thS defendant was liable to a penalty for keeping a dog for the pur pose of killing game ? . • Mr. 'GURNEY, for the defendant,. submitted that this was n ot a case wit Lin the statute. To bring the defendant within the penalties, it must be clearly shewn that he kept the dog with the intent to kill game. He referred to a case in 15th Last's Re ports, wheie it has held by Lord Ellenborough, under n e arly similar circumstanees, that a young dog k_ pt in the house, ' though of &sporting breed, was not sufficient to subject t.h _party•to the penalties of the statute. Mr. 'Justice BuirreoUGg thought it was a question !Or ' the Jury, and said, he was not aware that itlad been ever yet diS" tinctly decided that a person who kept a sporting dog, though :he did not actually use it for thatpurpose, was exempt from tlld penalty: • The Case referred to was distinguishable froin because there the dog was so young, that it would have Wl * uselesi for the purpose of killing game ; but here the dog wa 6 obviously a sporting dog, and two _years kir* had been so use d by the defendant. fle could barb sincerely wished, hirarevcri that the law would have. enabled him to nonsuit the plaintiff' for he had never heard of a more cruel or unjustifiable action 9 11 ! . the game laws. Mr. GURNEY then went to the Jury, and put it to themjil strong terms, whether the defendant had kept the dog with tent to . kill -game. He urged that the evidence in the can o completely 'negatived the intention. He animadverted all the iniVity of the action, which strongly marked a spirit 0 . oppression which, he hoped and believed; was , not prevale c 4 amongst the Gentry of the county towards their tenantry. they believed-that the defendant had not kept the dog for t tr purpose imputed; he was entitled to a verdict. ,I 1 hoped l law of England was not yet so oppressive, that a man might Do e breed &VS, either for sale or domuStic uses, without subjectir, • himself to penalties. The ,game lawi were written in ciently strong characters, and already executed With a sufficii : !,,,r' degree ,of rigour, without putting.this additional construt; upon them, which would render the situation of a farmer en. an oppressive Squire absolutely , intolerable. Mr. Justice BunnouGn.express'A extreme regret that t 1 d action had been brought by a gentleman, described as a inclit,;, 3 fortune.and respectability, because_ lie thought • it . one Of ai hardest that ever - came to his knowledge; but lie w,as bot-o'y. tell the Jury,..that a man who kept a sporting dog, though tht o was no proof of his having actually used it to destroy gsl.3c7-1 1 1 -4 liable to a penalty. The same - observation would . rice *VI .! the keeping a gun, because a gun is necessary to the defence• a-man's house. But there is no occasion for a man keepiqi i i sporting dpg for that purpose. A common house dog wlo answcrthe same object equally well. If he was wrong i" ruling, the defendant would have an opporttmity of corrcctl:; , his judgment in the Court of King's Bench, and with that be` he would reserve the. question, in order tharthe point finTheall settled. . , y Jury. expressed greatreluetafiee in finding a verdict ixt, the plaintiff, but in deference to his Lordship's Opino 3 ' f o r point of law, they felt themselves bound to find a verdict the plaintiff—Penalty L 5. - _ The business on this side finished to-day, at twelve o'cloc''' . In the Crown Court there was nothing worth mentioning. BOXING. OLIVER. AND TIIItNEIL.—A match l made uP `" the moment, was fought yesterday in a - 513 'on the V%- r road, for a guinea and a cart of .‘ blue ruin." Turhcri tt; r is a pupil of Carter's, challenged Oliver "if Cribb's. The, '' s 3 s took but little notice of him, until Turner putting at 'guinea to fight, Oliver covered it, and both met iri an ig ‘, f ert the appointed sPot; Richmond and NiAßreown seconded L"' • and Carter and astranger picked up Turner.. °f - Eleven rounds were fought in 22 minutes. The wetn e 6 o .o - the ground foiled both the men, and after missing hits, followed, and Turner was thrown. 2. Turner shewed some science, which Would have doll biro the gloves; but Oliver got bet Ween his guard, and gras sed by , a hit on the breast. s the 3 and 4. Turner rushed and Oliver parried his hl/ arn er ground being toomet to iamke a stand to receive him. , - tike angrily asked why Oliver did not stand and fight ? and iw in swer was, " 1 3 11 be with you directly," and he threw 11 both rounds. • ch ate° 5. Turner received a flush hit on the temple, Yin' streams of claret and set his eyes bfrr.' , ll(iqodin. - • 6. Oliver placed a - good right..handed hit.upon' g hisadYe''' ey 7 e, and threw him. The fight was his own. r v. • and 8. - Oliver placed several hits, - and thre* hii a..,0e•t1% who was dead beat. 9. Turner slipped down in making play. 10. Oliver. - placed a heavy hit on the mark, which d A ° lll le3 t• his adversary up and won the fight, as in the next ro tntu net could not stand. Mr. MACREADY made his appearanc e at t b Birmingham Theatre, on the ist instant, and- of hailed on his first entrance with a wa r m th ti enthusiasm, which must have been high!) . g r te a fying to his feelings. lie is engaged for itac , nights, and has already played Virginias, both, and Wallace, with great applause, to crovier, ed audiences. The anxiety to witness his I ) be formances was never surpassed here : even ' II days of Miss O'NEILL. - - -- . MARRIED. , tY -to., On 'Wednesday, at Hampstead Church, Dr. Lushintil, cor,, r ,distinguished Counsel of her late . 3Ljesty, to 'Hi ss daughter of Thomas W. Carr, Esq., Solicitor to the _i li i „ Dr. - Lushinkon, it is supposed, will proceed almost intnl'e;; 4 to BrUniWicK, for nurpos , ...s relating to tl*;rentova l dr .. ,,t jesty's remains to that place for interment. ), of 1 1 1 N. esterday , at Stepney Church, fir. Dryden Etsto.9, ~- llermitage-street, to Miss QUenby,, niece of Edvcal'! to 1.?,,1., Grove-road, Mile End-road. :tre e of 1 esterday, Benjamin • Rouse, Esq., of New Brfdr 04' Elizabeth Ann, eldest daughter of William Gaskii' , _ Chalfont St. Peter's, Bucks On Wednesday, at 11 o'clock in the fe,enoOn, at, 1 7 1 -c os , a b ti_ ;l, he li li t •J in Lower Grosvenor.sticet, B att i e E r l a ) s . hort but severe , - ..a - e ity• - i i,c b il e i r g o o l n t i h t . her s rstlo. b ß haae y ge d ieui e , ai r I , arlali t ng, h :od,i e foi rldr l eeirt a iut ldr health. rro y nso . sev. o d, f yi h lf.lr e sobin ß illeel i i: wi r ies l hsa l i t ees iii.,11::150;111,e ito.foresiiftt.h. C a s : i l . 3 tiribt I,3e ,: tr lji i ii:it,t , a : yearo humane l . woman, hert Lady A'Cottrt, relict of Sir P. A. A'Court, Etna I " ° jeoil' °- i; p u r a e r s y eu t tilhreiticsohurEtrioNf'oNy Na les s o d r i t e l L i i na o 7 4. a h n u d r,A Ni a ir y l i a l : o36 l . ll lri the seventy-fifth year of her age. . ~,toT °: 0 The drarnati,; veteran Hough, who was etc, The N `Th - Betty, when he performed under the title of ' ~r b ysilif ; ,:t, Roscius," died, a few days ago, at Chesterfield, lo v e- rrettlri l e At her house,.Shrub's-hill, near Worcester, Lady _ o f t• relict of Sir Henry Temp..', Bart., and only datigh'sltire. late Henry Lambert, Esq. of Barton Court, lierealli , l° ° :: On the'2lst ult. at Bervie, aged CO, 3lr. Aloc an e ttog. .4 He was the first who' introducrd the art of spinnil T iowl cc4 : machinery, into Scotland (having' acquired the . , situ ,r?''' of it from the original patentees at Da rlin g ton), 80" • ed the first Scotch spinn i ng mill • the water of 13ervi ... ......." on .......................e.-- - ' --------- —_--- o 0 4, °lcat LONDON : Printed by J. B. CARST A ntS, ot - N • • - t c . P. 01.mnd-street, Queen -square ; n.rtel published LI . ; s i r* SCRIPPS, of •No. - 7, South 111olttol-street, at .I ___. ~,L , P 3I OFFICE, No 112, Strand ; where 413 v trt3ot. OUTARs, LaiTTERs, &c. (post-paid) niUra be ga,IF