The Sun. — London, England, 1839-06-25 00:00:00

EVEN INTO EDITION. men opposite appeared to be blind to a scriptural plan of education, and had ingeniously contrived to divert the at tention of the public mind from the real question. All that was said by the Government was, that this sum was only to be given for the present—they said nothing as to the future. The worst feature in the plan abandoned was, that the'Government proposed to grant the public money to Clergymen of different religious persuasions, but even under the proposed new system it was said the Com mittee of Privy Council would not feel themselves pre- eluded from giving aid to any school that might apply for it. And there was nothing whatever to prevent the Go verement reverethg to their old scheme. The Hon. and Learned Member for Dublin had endeavoured to vindicate the Douay version of the Bible, and had said there was very little difference between that and the Protestant cession; but the Hon. and Learned Member, in his zeal to defend the Douay version, had forgot that in that version there was a sentence in which the Roman Catholics de fended (as the Protestants called it) their idolatrous worship. If the Douay version was allowed to be intro. duped, what security was there against the introduction of die S )cinian and Unitarian versions of the Scriptures ? Such a system could necessarily end in general sectarianism. He put it to the Noble Lord, considering the sthte of the country—considering the intensely earnest pleading of the Church of England on the subject—considering the grow. ing impression th* something must be done for education —( Ministerial cheersf—that it should approach as much as possible towards a national system of education —( Hear, hear)—and that the only one was furnished by the Church Establishment.—(Oh, oh I) Why not come forward ant place himself at the bead of the Church, call on the Go vernment of the country to bestow on it their liberality, and, with God's blessing, he might serve the country in one of the Ines: difficult and perilous crises in which it could be placed ?—( Hear, hear.) Mr. LANGDALE said the Noble Lord opposite be longed to that section who were most consistent in the conduct they were pursuing. He could understand the consistency of the Noble Lord when he said to the Esta blished Church alone should the education of the people of England be consigned. But he did not so well under stand the ground taken by the Noble Lord the Member for North Lancashire. if he (Mr. Langdale) understood it, it was this--that he was w itling to give education to all the people of England except the English Roman Catholics.__( Hear, hear.) Ile (Mr. Langdale) acknow ledged the number of petitions on the table—he ad mitted there was a strong feeling on the subject through• out the country, but considering the means' adopted for raising that cry, it was wondct tul that the expression of feeling had not been more strong. But had there been any one instance in wlsieh a public meeting had been called to give the sanction of the people to the question? . There was not a single hi-tance ; fnr where meetings had been called the supporters of the Government plan had been excluded from them.—( Hew., hear.) 'He wished the Hoxse to consider the tone of these petitions. Did the Noble Lord, the Member for North Lancashire, adopt the tone of them ? There was no term so abusive—there I was no imputation so infamous thet h a d no t b een use d in .. 1 these p ti:ions aga i nst a partic u ' as c l ass o f re li g i on i sts. . If the Noble Lord did concur in these petitions, he ought to adopt the tone, aid concur in the plans brought forward in another place, and propose the repeal of Catholic Emancipation altogether.—( !leer, hear ) If they ex cluded any particular clasa, it was a breach of tolera tion—if they excluded the Roman Catholics from shoeing, in a public grant, they made them pay the penalty of ' their religiors A great deal had been said about the ( State conscience. Those who talked in this manner, in order to carry out their consistency should only allow the • , National School Society. - To be consistent, and support the Eatabliked Church on the State conscience, they ought to refuse all grants to any class not educated in the Established apligion. To what class was it that they were now refusing a r articip.ition in the grant raised from the public taxes, to which all contributed ? Was there nothing due in satisfaction to the Roman Catholics of this county I from the cours e a d o p te d towar d s t h em f ormer l y ? During the time of swore persecution they had ra i se d f un d s f ur the education of their children for the support of religion ; they had invested large sums in the funds of Foreign States, under th e f a i t h o f a solemn treaty. That fund was taken possession of under the plea of an almost obso lete enactment, and applied for the purposes of the State. lle did not wish to us: irritating language, but probably the application of that sum was not to any much snore holy purposes than those superstitious usages under which the money was seized upon. It had Cecri said that funds ought not to be granred for the purpose of educating in a teligion which was wrong. If this was carried through out, the parties using such language would be con . siatent • with tl e nselvea. But in the East they made the sante grants which were now asked for here ; in the Western colonies and the penal settlements they were doing the same ; and they would hardly ven t ure to refuse to the millions of ireltad that which they said it was not consistent with their conscience to grant to the poor, the helpiesa, and destitute in this country.—( Hear.) Mr. LITTON said that Ro man who had a regard for fhe Protestant Establishment in this country, or its truths, could sustain the proposition of the Noble Lord; and he en treated the House not to be misled- by any assertion that the original plan of the Government had been abandoned in ar t y respect.—( Hear, hear.) He differed altogether from the observations of the •Hon. Member for Leeds, whose speech was intended to satisfy the House that the I Goverment had abandoned their previous object. The ' truth was that the plan was only postponed, and not aban doned, till the Protestant was found asleep at his post. And many taking up these resolutions would find in the one a fixed intention on the part of the Government ex pressed, and in the ether a full power of carrying out that intention reserved. His first objection to the plan was that it led young minds to doubt ; another objection was, that so far from its being a plan likely to lead to peace, it would engender discord, strife, and heart burnings. ( Hear, hear, bear.) He would ask any Hon. Member whether he thought it right to send the I youth of this country to schools where all religions were treated alike ? For his own part, he dreaded the admis eiun of Roman Catholic Priests late Protestant schools, because lie looked upon proselytism as the leading and guiding spirit of the Roman bathalic Clergy.—( Hear, hear) He could not but lament the course adopted by tine Noble Lord, fur he had over and over again attacked Om Clergy of the Church o f E ng l an d , as well as F fle Clergy of the Chureh of Leland, and done all in his power to lower and degrade , them.—( Hear.) The Noble Lord w..s an enemy to the Established Church, and lie ( Mr. Litton) wished the people should know that the present Ministry wished to lower the dignity of the Established Church. Let not the people of England be deceived. lie said it negatively, nay, he positively affirmed that the people of England should not agree to this grant. If they did, they would see as in Ireland that National Education would be deserted by the Protestant clergy; the education in Ireland was hot National Educa tion bat priests' education. He would promise the House and the country that if they agreed to this grant they would be deceived. Mr. MORGAN JOHN O'CONNELL could not , sufficiently admire the ingenuity of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman in avoiding the question before .the House. But he hod mixed a strange kind of over refinement with his ingenuity in endeavouring to persuade the public that if the Government succeeded in the plan before the House they would lull the public mind and establish the plan which they had postponed. If this lulling should take place, it would be just as easy for them to establish the postponed plan, if this vote should be rejected, as if it should be accepted. On this topic be was surprised at the earnestness with which it had been insisted that all plans of National Education should be under the Ebntroul of the Established Church —now, if such were the case, the argument of the lion. and Learned Gentlemen would apply as well against the vote of last year, for dividing the grant between the two societies, ts against the present plan. The Hen. and Learned G en tle rea:i had alluded to Ireland —this he thought was unkind to the Noble Lord - who had ted the opposition on a former night. It struck him as rather strange that Honourable Gentlemen opposite should be now opposing what they themselves had been desirous should be done in Ireland—namely, to give the grant to separate sections instead of giving* it to one general scheme of education. The Noble Lord had en deavourod to do in this country what had been done- in Pel and on this subject ; he had then proposed to do in England what Hen. Gentlemen opposite had wished him . to do in Iceland, and he still encountered opposition. But education was not the real cause of this opposition, and Hon. Gentlemen opposite wished to take advantage of a party watch-word, which had added three-fold to the bitterness of religious differences. He would not allude to religion ; they bad already had a sermon on the Trinity front the Hoe. Member for Coleraine, which he humbly thought wes a bad taste. If they agreed to divide the grant beta ern these two Societi e s, it would c re a te a roost invidious distinction, because the only -• class that was excluded frsni the benefit of the British and Foreign School Society, because they would not adopt the version of the Scriptures adopted by the Established Church, was the Roman Catholics. Was this their con- science ? All these sects could not he right, therefore they would knocaingly admit error, but they would rigidly exclude one particular class of opinions. Was not this exciting the odium theologians in its worst form ? There are many thousands in the large manufacturing towns who would be excluded by the regulation alluded to —many who were in the lowest state of poverty and i.inorance, end who were expose:l to all the temptations incident to Ding in crowded towns, whom they thus took upon themselves to prevent receiving a small pittance, not from their own endpwments, but from those taxes to which Obey all contribute alike, for the purpose of receiving in struction. If the House should be led away by their prejudices to refuse this grant, they might be orthodox Christians, but they were not friends of social order, and Hon. Gentlemen would have gained a triumph fatal to the best interests of humanity. He trusted the Government would follow out their plan, which would entitle them to the gratitude of all tight thinking men ; and when the present cry should be past, he trusted they would be able to carry the intentien in favour of the holy cause of moral, religious, and National Education into execution before many years had elapsed. Mr. CRESSWELL said that the Government had appointed a Committee of the Privy Council to superin tend the plan of National Education. A majority of five of that House had determined that this was not so objectionable as to call for a rescinding of the Order in Council.—(Cheers.) Ile objected to voting this grant, because he thought that on this important subject the other branch of the Legislature ought to have been con. suited. It was attempting to carry out the Government Van by a mere manoeuvre, which had been nlludcd to in a Paruphlet, emanating from a body of the supporters of the Noble Lcrd. (The Hon. and Learned Gentleman here read an extract from the papers of the Central Society of Education, bearing out his views.) This grant was sufficient to enable the Government to bribe every charity school in till kingdom to submit to the in spection. lie hoped that this scheme for taking away the ju risdiction of the House of Lords had not origiratcd with the Nuble Lord, although it bad emanated from his supporters. He called on the Committee of the Privy Council to state cltfinUivt•ly what their were, in order that, if the H ouse approved of them, th ey night vote them, and if they disapproved r the ' , they might reco r d thei r Toltet, however feebly, against them. Such perhaps *tit- not the of the w Noble Lord, b ut i t was that of his supporters. But did that Noble Lord think that if a Bill, supported by the vast majority of five, were sent to the other House, their Lordships would pass it sooner than thwart the wishes of the people, expressed so strongly through the voices of their representatives. (Laughter, and Hear.) . And those who were on their trial were•included in that majority.—( Hear, hear.) Nor could the Noble Lord expect to have-the measure on the ground of the full and just confidence placed in her Majesty's Ministers by the majority of the people. —( Hear, hear.) As for the merits of the scheme, no two men appeared to agree, and the merit therefore was doubtful. Could it be expected that the House should now confide in the Noble Lord be cause he had abandoned the former plan? If it were aban doned because it was a bad scheme, it showed that they were incompetent to form a good one, and should not be supported—if, because they had not the power to carry it out, they, at that side of the House, would give the Noble Lord the desired power, by agreeing to the present vote.— ( Hear.) Thus be had placed the Noble Lord in a dilemma, from which he thought thole was no escape. He (Mr. C.) thought the silence of those who petitioned against the first scheme proved that they did not like the second. In the former the Noble Lord had desired to have schools of his own—in the present he gave up that power ostensibly, but he would induce other parties to set up schools, and would then support them.—( Hear, hear.) Ai he (Mr. C.) had said a few days ago to an objector to the Beer Bill— who said that the publicans principally cried out against it because at the immorality it caused by allowing the beer to be drunk on the premises- 4 ' Oh," said he (Mr. C.), " it would not be enough to take away that potter, for then the beei.sellers would induce others to op.n houses next door, in which they would take care to have the beer effectually consumed."—( Hear, heir, and laughter.) One of his ( Mr. C.'s) great objections to the vote would be, that it would be a violation of his conscience. It would not violate his conscience if the party opposite should take his money to pay for general education-abut it would if he (Mr. C.) were to vote for it. ( Laughter, and Hear, hear.) As in the case of their esteemed countrymen of the Society of Friends, against whose con science_ it was to go to war, yet it would not be a violation of their conscience to take mo coy from them to maintain our fleets and armies.— (ll ear, hear.) The Hon. Gentleman at the other side h ad alluded to the success of a similar scheme at Liverpool, taus he (Mr. Ewart) had very much exaggerated the re- Its of the experiment tried there. The fact was, that so far from the clergy of the Established Church, and the Pro testants in that town having acquiesced in it, they opposed it as strenuously a; they could at first, and next, seeing that they could not preveot it, they subscribed in a single summer 10,0001. towards the Protestant schema, and that support bad been most gratefully received ; and now ; while the Roman Catholic children, and some of the Dissenters had books composed of extracts from the Bible, the Protestant children had the whole Bible.—( Hear, hear.) Since 1837, no Roman Catholic clergyman, no Dissenting clergyman, had visited the ccbools alluded to by the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Etvart). They had beer, visited by the clergymen of the Church of England only. This proved that the alleged combined religious education in Liverpool was a failure.— ( Cheers ) It might be combined secular education, but it certainly was not religious. The failure would be still further proved by reference to comparative numbers. The Protestant children educated at free schools of the Esta blished Church of Liverpool were B,9s7—those of the Dis senters of different persuasions, 3,o9B—the number of Scotch children amounted to 304—total 12,359. The total number of Roman Catholic children at the free schools was I 230. Where now was " the system of combined religious education at Liverpool working with complete success? The system was found to have failed in every foreign country in which it was tried—in Liverpool it was nothing lass than a miserable failure.---(Cheers.) The caet was, that in religion there was no neutral ground. Wherever people thought they had found it, it soon re ceded from under their feet: It had been found impussi tale to unite the children in Liverpool in any one act of common religious worship. A clergyman of the Church of England had offered himself as most willing to instruct the children as far as he coulJ, provided this could be done, but it could not. It was even proposed that they should commence in the morning by repeating the Lord's Prayer in common. But the Roman Catholic priests would not agree to this, although they all agreed in receiving that prayer from the same Divine authority. The Roman Ca. thoiic clergyman was not to blame here—he undoubtedly did what he thought to be his cloy. St-me hymns had been proposed to he sung in common, he knew. But if those were said, they were said by rote, not accompanicp by any devotional feeling. lie was asked, if h e hi mse lf tunic ved the truth of the Protestant religion why oppose this vote? nil answer was, the more he believed in its truth the more be was afraid to let it be invaded. —( Cheers. ) Beliaving that they would be proceeding in a most wild and rash, and improvident course, in attempting to subject the judgment and consciences of the people to the controul of a Committee of the Privy Council; and believing that they had no right to deprive the co-ordinate branch of the Legislature of its undoubted right ty interfere in the ex penditure of the public funds, he should oppose the vote. Mr. V. SMITH and Mr. Sumo rose together. The latter gentleman gave way, although there were loud calls for him from all pseta of the House. Mr. V. Smith observed that the Hon. and Learned Gentleman who had last spoken, in remarking upon their interference with the privileges of the other House of Parliament, appeared to have forgotten that it was the exclusive privilege of that House to vote the public money.—( Hear, hear.) . He could out under stand upon what grounds the Hon. and Learned Member would agree that they were not authorised to vote it alto cc:her independently of the other branch of the Legislative. If they referr, dto the poceedings of that House for the lest twelve years, they would fiud many votes of a similar tendency, without any assent having been sought from the other House ? Ile wou'd appeal to the Noble Load, the Member fs,r North Lancashire, whether his Irish national education scheme, and others of a similar character,were net c rried into effect without any interference on the part of ;he other House. Were not the grants for colonial educa• Lion similarly carried ? and, in the case of the West India negrocs was .not the very same sum, 30,0001., granted with the same provision, that it should be a liberal and comprehensive plan.--( Cheers.) Hon. Members opposite had, he believed, expressed their determination to light the grant inch by inch. It would be admitted that his ( Mr. Vernon Smith's) side of the House had gained one inch—the assent of the House to the Order in CVUL. Cil.--( Ironical cheers from the Opposition.) He admitted that the majority was a scanty one, but if Hon. Members on the other side would try it over again, he would be rejoiced at it. • In the male of the debate it had been stated by sonic of the Hon. Members behind him that they saw no difference between the present and the former Government ; but the principle put forward by some of the late adherents of the Government must have convinced them that such was not the' case. The Government had abandoned their original plan, because it was unpopular— ( Hear, hear)—but they had not abandoned its defence although they had abandoned the plan.—(Opposition cheers.) He wished, however, to confine the attention of the House to the plan of the 34 of June, that now before the Ho use. In 1833, Lord Althorp first brought forward a vote for the National and the British and Foreign School Society. That was merely a temporary expedient to satisfy the great thirst for education until Parliament hal bad time to devise some plan of general education.— ( Hear, hear.) Committees of inquiry were subse quently appointed in the years 1834 and 1835, but without any result ; and in 1838. another bad been appointed on the motion of the Hon. Member for Shrewsbury, which had merely reported in favour of an extension of the grant. Why, it was absurd to call a grant of 30,000/. a Govern ment scheme of education—many of their convict votes were larger. A sum of 30,0001. to two Societies, neither of which could exercise any controul over the schools con nected with them, would not certainly impress any one with a profound idea of the provision made by the State for a plan of national education. It was merely putting so much money into the bands of the two respectable gentle men who acted as secretaries of these Societies, while the Right Hon. Gentleman, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, collected subscriptions.—( Hear, bear.) He should most decidedly object to a continuance of that scheme, if it was recognised or acknowledged as such. The Hon. and Learned Member for Liverpool had urged a point that was frequently put forward in the course of the former debate. He had said the Church was the sole educator of the people, and had asked what was re ligious liberty ? He (Mr. V. Smith) would reply that it d.d not consist in the Church being the sole educator of the people.—( Hear, hear.) But then the Hon. and Learned Gentleman had said he would not consent to the circula. lion of erroaccus opinions. Why did be consent to votes of money for the purpo s e o f supporting different reli gious establishments in th e co l on i es wich were not in accerdance with the principles of the Church of England, and why did he support Church extension in Scotland ?—( Hear, bear.) The Hon. and Learned Member next taunted the Government about the smallnes.s of their majority, and had asked if it was an opera question. He thought that question might with better propriety . have been put to his own side of the House— ( Ilear, bear)—and certainly ; judging from the opinions that had been expressed by Hun. Members opposite, it was pretty clear they had not been all educated in the same school.—( hear, hear.) This however he would say, that throughout the late debate it was shown the Noble Lord and those who supported him, and not lion. Gentlemen opposite, were the champions of education.---( Hear, hear, and Oh, oh.) Sir GEORGE CLERK said the reason which in duced him to make a few remarks was, that he could not but feel the deepest alarm at an extension of the Govern. ment plan to Scotland. The resolution was for a vote of 30,0001. for the purposes of education in Great Britain, and that was to be placed in the hands of a Committee of the Privy Council. There was a system of National Education in Scotland which bad given the greatest sa tisfaction—( Hear)—and what was the merit of that plan ? That it was intimately connected and interwoven with the Established Church—(Tory cheers)--that it was under the superintendence and inspection of the Established Church—( Hear, hear)—that it formed a necessary part of the ecclesiastical policy of this country—that it was a reli gious and a scriptural education.—( Hear, hear.) He ob jected to this sjstem because it made a material change •n the system. Now either Scotland was to be excluded 'from any participation in this grant, or they must submit to the inspectorsnominated by the Privy Council superseding the inspection of the schools, which was at present vested in the Presbytery.—( Cries of " Divide, divide.") The o`•;jcct of the present motion lie believed was to enable the Government to establish Catholic schools in Scotland.— ( Oh, oh.) Such was the anxious wish of many Gentle men who supported it.—( Oh, oh.) He believed that be spoke the sentiments of nine-tenths of the people of Scotland upon this • subject, that they would rather not receive one shilling of the State grant for education than that it should be distributed on the principles of the Government scheme.—(Hear, hear.) It was only be cause they had been led to believe that this scheme would not extend to them, that public meetings had not been held against it from ono end of Scotland to the other: and that petitions had not been poured in against it in thousands. And he pledged himself that if her Majesty's Government would postpone their scheme, to afford time for the ex- Fusion of public opinion on this subject in Scotland— (Cheers)—the result would be what he had described.— ( Hear.) He should give his decided negative to thevote now proposed to be taken, but at the same time would avow his perfect readiness to agree to an increase of the educational grant, to be distributed in the usual way, for he was deeply sensible of the great importance of the ex tension of education, upon what he deemed right prin ciples.—( Hear, bear. ) Mr. SHELL then rose and said—Sir, the Hon. Baronet who has just sat down has adverted to a fact of great im portance in relation to Scotland, which shows that the in tentions of Government upon this subject are not what he imagines. He says, that a Roman Catholic priest applied to the Chancellor of the Exchequer for a grant of money for a school, in which the Roman Catholic religion was exclusively taught. The application was refused : Why ? Because the Government aid would not be given to schools confined to any exclusive faith.—( Hear.) What right, then, has the Hon. Baronet to attribute in tentions to the Government, which are at variance with that which he himself stated.—( Cheers.) He speaks of the intentions of the Goveriiment—l cannot dive into his own. I trust one of them is not to raise the "No Popery cry," in his own country.—(Cheers.) Sir, I listened with great attention to the speech of the Hon. and Learned Member fur Liverpool, because he has distinguished him self in his profession—because he represents a town con nected with education—and because I myself, before this debate, took the trouble to inquire into the facts. And I must say that I have documents in my possession which are utterly contradictory to those statements which the Hon. Member has put forth.—( Hear, hear.) There were Corporation schools in Liverpool before corporate reform. What took place ? I have the proof here, that before cor porate reform there were only three Catholics in the whole town of Liverpool—containing nearly 70,000 of them— who received the benefit of the instruction in those schools. —( Hear, hear.) After corporate reform, the Counsel ap pointed a committee, of whom Mr. Blackburn was at the head, and be states,—" The property committed to the management of the Council does not belong to one party or sect, but to the whole community. It is ob viously, therefore, the duty of the Council to employ these funds for the benefit of all. In considering the way in which these schools are to be conducted, the first question is, what system should be adopted to render them accessi ble to children of all denominations, and the means of moral and elementary instiuction, without compromise of principle, to all. To confine them to exclusive sects would be an act of gross and palpable injustice, and a flagrant violation of their duties, who ought to represent the interests of dll classes of the people. Looking at the state of society in Liverpool, it is impossible to forget, that a very large portion of the popelstion are Irish Roman Catholics, who are permanently settled among us, and are, upon the grounds of humanity, justice, and sound policy. entitled to our sympathy and kindness."—( Cheers.) Well, they have adopted the Irish system of National Education, How has it worked ? The Member for Liv rpool says, badly. Sir, I have here a letter from Mr. Rathbone, late Mayor of Liverpool—(Jsers from the Opposition).--a gen tleman who, though opposed to the Noble Lord ( Sandoz') in politics, will I am sure be admitted by the Noble Lord to be of the highest respectability.—( Hear, hear, from Lord Sandon. ) He writes thus—" We have the gratification of believing that the system works admirably, though exposed to reckless misrepresentation," The lion, and Learned Member for Liverpool said the Catholic Priests would. not attend—hear what this Gentleman writes :—" The Catholic Priests have acted with great liberality-4 Chem s) —allowing and encouraging the children to come to the schools, tinder the direction of a Committee at one time wholly Protestant—and it has been proved that, without any compromise of principle, a system of National Educa tion may be established practically beneficial to all classes, in secular eduestion, without interfering with the iestree t ion of each sect in its religious dogmas—proving that they are Christians by loving one another."—( Lend cheers.) And the testimony of many orthodox Dissenting Ministers is given to the beneficial - working of these schools, in diffusing instruction over a large mass of pepulatioa hitherto immerst d in ignorance. —(Cheers.) Now, Sir, is that not decisive as to Liverpool?—( Hear, hear.) But ought we not to turn our eyes to Manchester and Salford, with 70 000 Roman Catholics; and is it not our duty to supply instruction for them.—( Cheers.) Ido not know what is the number of Roman Catholics in the country. They have been estimated at 2 000,000—(0h, oh, from the Opposition)—by a - writer in Fraser's Magu2ine —( Hear, bear, from the Ministerialists.) Now only see what anomalies you commit, you let the Ca tholic arrive at the highest stations both at the bar and on the bench, yen let the Catholic enter this House and the Palace, but you turn upon the child of the Roman Catholic you show your last effort - at intolerance by shutting the door'of the village school to the unhappy Roman Catholic. Hear, hear.) lam not so unjust as to believe that the gentlemen on the other side of the House wi-h that. the Roman Catholics should rot be educated. lam sure they wish them to be educated, but then cornea the question how is it to be done. The Hon, Member for Tame orth did not advert very distinctly, at least to any general principle on on which he would build his system of education ; he said, however, that he was not responsible for all that had been said on his side the : question--( Hear, hear)—but in what respect he agreed cr dissented front those gentle men, whom I will call his auxiliaries, he did not state.— ( Hear, hear.) He did net deal in general principles, and he was right in apt doing so.—( Hear, hear.) His object was this—you ought not to have a Board of national edu cation unless you put the Dignitaries of the Church upon it.—(Hcar, hear.) If you did that, in what condition, I would ask, would the Bishop of London he placed ? ( Hear ) Could he agree to educate them in terets from which he disser.ted? Could he allow the Douay Bib'e be read in those schools? I know he is a great Greek scholar—(laughter)—but he is bound to hold that the Church was infallible. Then the Homan Catholic is to be excluded. 1 , 1,)w I will pass from the ltioit lion. Baronet to two N , ble Lords, the Members for North Devonshire and South Hampshire. One of tho.=,e Noble Lords opposed the education sy tem ; he said it was not consistent with his principles to give any sum for the edu cation of any class of her Majesty's subjects who held tenets different from the Church. Let the Wesleyan Methodists, who have been so often referred to, hear this fact, that the Noble Lord the Member for North Lanes shire, in 1825, [novel a resolution, that every Catholic Bishop should be paid in Ireland, and that a' sum of 250,0001. should be given annually to maintain the Catho lic Church in Ireland ; and now he comes forward and denounces the Government scheme of cdacation, because, forsooth, Christians of all denominations came in under it. Noes I will pass from the Noble Lord the Member for North Lancashire to the Noble Lord the Member for South [lamp. shire. The Hon. and Learned Member for Liverpool had de nounced a mixed education ; now, I appeal to the Noble Lord:himself with respect to that question.—(Great con-. fusion, and cries of " Order, order,")—in the midst of which Mr. B A RRON rose ar.d said, there is a Noble Lord at the end of the House—(Great confusion.) Mr. SHIEL--I entreat my friend the Member for Waterford• not to interfere. If I have said anything that appears offensive to any individual I should be extremely sorry for it, but as long as I am pursuing a legitiniate argu ment I trust the House will allow me to proceed.—( Hear, hear, and cries of " Bar, bar". )—I feel that the subject has already been more than amply discussed.—( Hear, hear.) I was: suggesting, without the slightest intention of say• ing anything discourteous—l was adverting to the anomaly that the Noble Lord, the Member for North Lan cashire, that be should at one time int, oduee education for Ireland, and at another that he should set up against it.---( Hear, hear.) I know that Ireland is in a different condition from this country ; I am not so unjust as to say that because you do one thing England that therefore you should do the same for Ireland. I will not say because there is a Church in England that therefore there ought to be one for Ireland.—( Hear, hear.) We ought to have a system of education which would meet all legitimate scruples, and lam satisfied that the Privy Council-will take such a course as will lead to that end. Upon this sub ject the Right Hon. Member for Pembroke got up after the Chancellor of the Exchequer, who followed the Mem ber for Newark, of whom all speak with respect, and I never heard a stronger case made than was done by the Chancellor of the exchequer. What did the Member for Newark state ? Why, that it was against his principles to advance money for a religion which he did not profess. The speech of the Hon. Member for Newark was com pletely overwhelmed by the arguments of the Chancellor of the Exchequer. It was proved over and over again, that money was granted in all the colonies for the very perpose that was required here. The Hon. Member for Pembroke was obliged to confess that the principle had been violated by' the very men who laid it down with such a peremptory tone. The Hon. Member for Newark passed a pane gyric upon - the Wesleyan Methodists, which I con sider most .uncalled for on his part.—(hear.) They seemed to him to be actuated by a most undue hor ror of Popery. As they resembled so nearly in many of the tenets he wished the Church resembled them also in their fearlessness. What had that Church to fear—the cry was raised that the Church was in danger. In what manner— had not one of their own poets, who had gone from one camp into the other, said of her— " Without unspotted, innocent within, She felt no danger, as she knew no sin." dan t g h the State, er—t l' S eC te h , u s r v e h h ic o h r England,(Cheers.) h e r w h T i chi was Church incorporatedwas in with was supported by the aristocracy, and was implanted in the heart of the lower orders—a hich possessed valuable re venues—a splendid hierarchy, a prelacy distinguished by its piety and its learning, and a lower order of clergy dis tinguished fer their energy ; and this Church, so based on the people; SO supported by its aristocratic sustainment, was in danger, and was to be annihilated, not by foreign aggressions, not by conflicting interests, but by a miserable band of shoeless, shirtless, poor Popish paupers—(Cheers and laughter) —with no other missiles than the Douay Testament, and who were to be gathered from the lanes of Liverpool, the alle3 s of Salford, and the receptacles of St. Gilesi s _< Loud cheers.) Fear made Statesmen cruel and Churchmen harsh—( Cheers) and even on men dis tinguished for' their humanity, it produced a deleterious effect. lie would take as an example the Noble Lord the Member for Dorsetshire. That Noble Lord was distin guished for hit humanity, he had exhibited a deep sympa thy for those unfortunate children who in the spring tide of their lives, when all should breathe of hope, were im mured in those dismal fabrics which had been erected as temples to the spirit ofgain.—( Cheers.) His concern for the factory children, whose cause through evil report and through good report he supported, did him honour; but when he turned from the factory children to the Church, how was he changed ? Had the Noble Lord ever penetrated into those loathsome and subterranean receptacles in which the barefooted Irish were crowded in that metropolis, or had he ever ascended into those rooms in which these unfortu nate squalid children were crowded together ? It was for these children that he applied for education. lie Was not instructed in religious controversy.—( Hear, hear, hear.) He read the Scriptures simply; and if any one passage more affectrd him than another, it was that passage in which the Divine Being said, " Suffer littlo children to come unto me."—( Loud, and long continued cheering.) He could not help thinking that if among the group which had been led towards him, there should happened to have been found the child of a Samaritan or of a Sadducee—the God of humanity would not have rejected the little schismatic.—(Long continued cheering.) He , Would beseech the House n o t to i m it a t e t h e examp l e of the Disciples, who would have shut up from them the sources of pure religion, but rather to follow the example cf the Divine Founder of their religion, who had said, "Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them nut, for theirs is the kingdom of Heaven."—(The lion. Gentleman sat down amid loud cheering from both sides of the House, which lasted several minutes.) Mr. GOULBURN could not hope to follow the Hon. Gentleman who bad just sat down in his eloquent appeal. with the last part of which he cordially concurred, and because of that concurrence be dissented from the present grant, which he thought was not calculated to bring little children to a knowledge of their Lord. No one could cor rectly understand the views of Government.—( Hear, hear.) Was the plan of April abandoned, or was it not ? Did they mean, when the money was granted, to apply it to the purposes of education, in conformity with the present plan, or with the first Minute of the Privy Council ? He would call the attention of the House for a few moments to what the vote purported to he. It was simply a grant of 30,0001. for the purposes of education—. it was not worded as the vote of former years, and he should be glad to have laid le fore the House the principles on which it was proposed to distribute this grant. He thought this afforded sufficient grounds for suspicion, and as a Member of Parliament, it was his duty to suspect the intentions of the Government. He believed that this re servation Was studied. They had been accused of a desire to reject all votes for education—nothing could be further from their wish —(llear, hear, and cheers. ) He must resist any vote that had not a definite object, but he should be quite ready to support the vote agreed to last session, and in several preceeing sessions. Here the amount of the grant was nothing, but its principle .was everything, and the resistance now made to the proposed grant, would not, he trusted, be understood as at all in dicating a feeling hostile to education, or as showing that those at his side of the House, were acting inconsistently with their conduct on former occasions, when year after year a vote for the purposes of education was agreed to, with the unanimous concurrence of the House. He knew that the right of granting money belonged now exclu sively to this House. The other House had a right of passing an ailirmative or negative voice upon that pro position, but of late years the Peers had' ab tndoned that right, by permitting the introduction of a clause at the ' commencement of every session, to the e ff ec t, th a t with • out waiting for the passing cf an Act, in all its stages, the House of Commons should be permitted to issue such sums of money as should be expedient er useful for the public' service. But if this House should persevere in such measures, they must not be surprised if the House of Lords should refuse the general provision at the beginning of another Session as hitherto.—( Hear, hear.) He . was at some loss to know, precisely, what was the meaning of the Hon. and. Learned Gentleman who had last addressed them. Did he mean that Roman Catholic children, and children of other persuasions, should be educated in several religions, avoiding any peculiarity of doctrine, btu permitting the entrance of such specific tenets as slesuld be able to make their entrance amidst the confusion of tenets ? If this were the feeling of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman, and he believed it wan he (Mr. ;Goulburn) could assure him that no member of the Church of England would show any willingness to enter the schools opened on such a principle. If they attempted to teach a system of religion .which should admit any or every version of the Scriptures, they would exclude the members of the Church of England as effectually from those schools as if they should have adopted a Popish system only. • As for the argunsent of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman about the Board, if it were worth anything it was worth this, that there was to be a Board of four laymen,lindifferent as to reli gion, lax in principles, and ready to concur in the introduc tion of some general system for the instruction of the pupils. The lion. and Learned Gentleman said the Roman Cs tholic Church did not heed exposure to their attacks. He wished to know in what country such a system existed ? Was it in Austria, where they saw 400 families turned out of their houses, because they dared to profess the Protes tant religion. Let him turn to Sardinia or go lower down to the Papal States, and he would find the same system pursued. He objected to those who were mem bers of the Established Church being 'exposed in the greenness of youth and intellect to the temptation of an education such as that which the present Government would provide. The Right Hon. Gentleman was frequently in terrupted towards the close of his observations by loud cries of " Divide," which rendered it extremely difficult to catch the whole of any one sentence. He concluded by stating his determination to Oppose the vote. Lord J. RUSSELL had no desire to enter into the general question before the [louse, but wished merely to an- swer one or two questions put by the lion. and Learned Member for Liverpool, upon ahich he felt himself .bound to eff.:r some explanation. The lion. and Learned Gen denier) had expressed a doubt as to whether the Minute of April had been given up. lie wished to know whether, in the event of the present vote being passed, they would recur to that Minute. He must say, that if the lion. and Learned Gentleman wished to know what the inten tions of the Government were, he would have done far better to consult the Reports of the Committee of the Privy Councilo-- than to have referred to some essay of the Central Society of Education—((lsar, hear) which be had seemed to consider a good authority on the subject.—(Elear, hear.) In that Minute it was stated ex pressly to what purposes the vote was to be applied, and he (Lord John Russell) would take the liberty of reading a part of it to the House, ns to the mode of application. It stated that a sum of 10,0001., which had been already granted in the year 1835, should be given in equal por tions to the National and British and Foreign Societies. That the remainder of the grants of 1837 and of 1838 which had been unappropriated should be applied in aid of subscriptions for building schools, and that grants might be made to poor and thinly populated districts, where the local subscriptions were found to be insufficient. The Committee did not think themselves, by that Minute, excluded from giving grants to schools not in connection with either of those Societies. The great bulk was to be given in aid of these Societies, but there was a small portion which might be otherwise applied. It was not doing justice to the ComMittee to say that they positively excluded all schools which Were not in connection with the National or the British The vote of last year with respect to England was - that a sum not exeeedi ig 30,0001. be granted to her Majesty to enable her to issue money for the erection of school houses, and to provide for the inspection of schools already established.--( Herr, hear.) Now he had no objec tion to add in aid of prlvate subscription for the inspection of schools already established and which might be established under this vote ; or, perhaps, without any addition at all, the vote, in the words of last year, which would answer the object they now had. —( Hear.) If taking the vote in the words of last year would remove the objections of the Honourable Gentlemen, ehe had no objection to have those instead of the words in which he had moved the vote last year.—( (leer, hear, and laughter. )—lf the Hon. Gentleman thought those wcrds were sufficiently definite he (Lord John) was ready to yield to his ohjsction.—( Hear, hear.) One other ques• tion asked was, he believed, with respect to the nature of the inspection of the schools. He did not think the inspection would at ail controul the religious instruction in the schools ; but he certainly conceived that, with respect to the National Society, if this vote passed, the Committee of rrivy Council would immediately be in communication with the Archbishop of Canterbury, and consult him as to the rules which should regulate any sum to be granted to the National Society._.( Hear, hear.) In conclusion he must say, that throughout the whole coarse of the four eights' debate lion. Gentlemen opposite had shown that they were exceedingly averse to adverting to that which was actually the plan proposed by the Government. —( Cheers.) Strangers were then ordered to withdraw. The Committee divided, when the numbers were : For the Vote Against it Majority The announcement of the numbers was received- - with loud cheers from the Opposition side of the Ilause. The Bankrupts' (Ireland) -Bill passed through Com- Mittee. _ The Exchequer of Pleas Bill was read a second time. The Sucar Duties Bill passed through Committee. The other 0. ders of the D ►y were then disposed of, and .he House adjourned at half-past Twelve o'Clock. THE REIGN OF •I'ERDINAND AND ISABELLA OF SPAIN.—We are requested to state that Mr. Bentley, of New Burlington. street, Publisher in Ordinary to her Majesty, has this day published the second edition, revised, of The History of the Reign of Ferdinand and Isabella, the Catholic, of Spain," by W. Prescott, Esq., in 3 vols. Bvo., bound, embellished with portraits of Colum bus, from the original by Parmegiano, Cardinal Ximenes, Gonsalvo de Cordova, and (now first added) Ferdinand and Isabella. Mr. Bentley has also just published the following now historicat works England under the Reigns of Edward and Mary, with the Contemporary His tory of Europe, illustrated in a Series of Letters, never before printed, by Patrick Fraser Tytler, Esq., author of " The History of Scotland," &c., 2 vols Bvo.,with portraits from original paintings. 2. Bishop Goodinan's History of his own Times, comprising Memoirs of the Courts of Elizabeth and James 1., edited by J. S. Brewer, M. A., 2 vols. Bvo., with portraits. Agents—For Scotland, Messrs. Bell and Bradfute, Edinburgh ; and Mr. Duncan Campbell ; Glasgow. For Ireland, Mr. John Cumming, Dublin. We may state, that we are credibly informed, Dr. Muir, and Mr. [lope :ohnson, M. P., have both retired from Dr. Chalmers's Committee.—Edinburgh Observer. The late B orough meet i ng at B recon i s still a subject of gre at annoyance to the Tory Journa li sts neighbourhood ; a of this shocked their nerves past all endurance. The Merthyr Guardian, in his superabundant innocence, is loSt in paragraph in the London Sun has now ad miration of the novel incident of a Mayor presiding at a meeting convened by himself I while the Monmouth Beacon affects to think that if the " good men and true" bad at. tended the meeti ng , t h ey wou ld h ave b roug ht with them an accession of respectability! The cause of all this f ruitless expenditure o f i re is very plain, and is s ufficient to account for th e prodigious cxcitement. wh e n memory strays back to t h e h appy t i mes when T ory m eetings were held with all the f ur tlimmed gowns, and the omp of official circumstan ce —the Aldermen in their Mace bearers in thei r amp l e cloaks, an d . w h en the scenes of those days of gl ory are contr a ste d w i t h t he spectacle of an Address to M a j esty h awked a b out front hole to corner f under the skirt of a coat, who can feel surprise at a tor rent of abuse of even thrice ' the fury of that furnished to order by our sco ldi ng contemporar i es ? Silurian. THE PRINCES.STREET Munv E rt.—The mys tery with which the above horrible and m elancholy occur. rence is enshrouded, has not in the slightest degree been dispelled by th e result of the i nqu i r i es instituted by tF e police since th e conc l us i on of the i nques t held on the body. Every inquiry any metropolis.portion n f the but I has been made respecting t he in mates of Mr. Westwood' s res id ence, an d a l so re specting the work. men, but nothing tending to throw a shad ow of s uspicion , against any of them has been ascertained.. Strict in quiries ha ve a l so b een made at all t h e v ,atchmakers, & e. ; and ls o ina l l largepawnbrokers, te throughoutwnnost,oyrelltynotraeenf the s olen prop erty h as b een discovered. METROPOLITAN POLITICAL SUMMARY. The Globe of last evening thus alludes to the Tory op position to the Government plan of ducation :—"he Tories, defeated in their efforts to t E hrove overboard? he Government plan for improving and extending the education of the people, mean to muster this evening in full array to oppose in the Committee of Supply the grant necessary for carrying it into effect. What they could not strangle they would starve. The Liberals are aware of their design; and will, we trust, be at their posts to frustrate it. Several who - were ab ent on Thursday evening will thus have an oppor tunity of adding to the majority ; others, who might feel justified in their resistance to the plan, will hesitate before they sanction by their votes the vexatious and factious op position to the vote of supply requisite to carry into execu tion a plan which, afteriample discussion, the House has already approved. We therefore expect not only that the opposition will fail, but that it will fail signally. The Tories, in their zeal against the plan of education prcposed by the Government, have put forward claims in behalf of the Church most unconstitutional and dangerous ; such as heve, we will venture to say, been rarely employed since the days of Sacheverell." The Courier remarks, with reference to the proposed discussion of to-night on the Education scheme :—" There is no doubt that the whole body of the Liberal representa tires of the reeale will be at their posts to-night, to sup port Lord John Russell in the good work which he has ever laboured to advance, with a sincerity and a zeal that should procure him forgiveness for greater political sins than any that he has yet had to answer for. The support he will thus receive to-night, though we cannot indulge a hope that it will achieve a triumph for the cause of education, yet will be sufficient to accomplish his object ; and small as the majority may be, Lord John Russell and his colleagues wilt have the con sciousness than in persevering under circumstances so try ing and disadvantageous, they are discharging a solemn duty to the nation—a duty which indeed derives additional solemnity from the difficulties which arc factiously thrown in the way of its discharge by the bigoted and despotic opponents of all but Church of England-education." The Standard is quite indignant, as will be seen by the following extract, that Ministers should presume to per severe in their education scheme:—" The same Ministers who abandoned their Jamaica Bill, and abandoned office, ' or pretended to abandon office, with it, because, as they confessed, an actual Miniverial majority office could not be offered as a testimony of the sense of Parliament— these same Ministers threaten to persist in their educa tion scheme, although having no better gremnd than a colourable and accidental Ministerial majority of five, a]- though the scheme has been condemned by a rnsjority of more than thirty of the representatives of England, which division of the empire only it concerns, -and although the people of England have remonstrated against it in nearly taur thousand petitions, scarcely a petition having been pre seated in its favour, except from a few strangers domesti cated in England." The Times of this morning, in the course' of a leading article suggested by last night's debate oe education in the Commons, says :—" The new plan of the Ministers pro poses to al?ew various versions of Holy Writ, to subject all the schools to the inspection, that is, to-the control of the Board of Education, and in oiler material respects to en danger the principles of The Protestant Church ; and, of consequence, it is strongly supported by the Roman Ca tholic body." Alluding to the division, our Contemporary adds The division gave to the powerful Government which now wields our - destinies a majority—not, indeed, as en the last occasion, a force of jive, but simply a working power of two; the Ministerialists being 275, and the friends of the Church 273. The craft is burnt to the very water's edge, yet still it continues to float !" The Morning Chronicle thus accounts for the smallness of the Ministerial majority last night in the Commons, on the subject of education :—" From the early hour at which the division took place, several Liberal Members were tsken by surprise and shut out. The numbers were 275 and 273. The grant, except for this accidental circum stance, would have been carried by a greater majority than that of Thursday night. Ministers having obtained the vote, will, we have no doubt display the necessary firmness in acting en it." Speaking, in another leading article, about the Tory hostility to education our Contemporary observes :—" The hostility which hai been manifested by the Tory party to the education of the people is not an irregular outbreak of party warfare, or an incidental result of party policy, and as such to be forgotten on the termination of the struggle; it goes deeper; it belongs essentially to Tory principle; and it ought to produce the eternal proscription of that party from the powers of Go- verntnent in a community that claims to be free and civil ised. An absurdity so monstrous has seldom been avowed as that which denounces the voluntary system in religion, and advocates that same voluntary system in education. We do not defend it in religion; but there is scarcely a single argument against it that does not tell against its ap plication to educe:ion with tenfold force." The Morning Herald twaddles away about last night's division in the Commons on the education question, in this factious, spiteful, old-woman style :—" Will Ministers pretend to retain office after the division of last night? How will their duty to the Queen' square with their majority of two? Alas! poor Whigs! place and pay are more seriously endangered than ever ! - The efficacy of their compromises, and equivocations, and meannesses and falsehoods is almost exhausted Their Popish majorities arc becoming evaneseeet ! They entered office in 1835 with a working msjerity' of 54 ;—and they have worked that , working majority' down to two I This scheme of education has been pronounced by Ministers a vital question.' Last night's majority ought. at all events, to determine the ' vitality' of the Adminis tratioa. To what, besides, may the present miserable fficials venture to trust ? They dare not grapple with the ordinary business of the country. They dare not deal with the affairs of Canada, er with the affairs of Jamaica, or with the question of Irish Corporations, or with- the question of Church -rates, or with the existing commercial difficulties of the country I The slightest attempt to assert any one of their declared principles wilt leave them in a minority." . . The Morning Post, with a logical acumen and precision worthy of a tenant of St. Luke's, endeavours to show that, by advocating a liberal and enlightened system of policy, Ministers arc paving the way for bigotry and into lerance ! . " When it is suggested to Lord J. Russell," says our argumentative Contemporary, " that by consi dering how rie may piny3c certain Dissenters, instead of considering how he may carry into practical effect certain duties which belong to the State, ho is producing confu sion and uncertainty, he answers by an exclamation that he is at least not introducing bigotry and intolerance. His Lordship is too hasty. We think he is leading the way to the ascendancy of bigotry and the practice of in tolerance, by departing from fixed principles of freedom. Ile policy of his Lordship's Government—or we should rather say its wretched necessities—have induced him to countenance the commencements of anarchy in the all important matter of religious instruction. It is not in the nature of men, nor of society, especially with the ha bitudes of thought and feeling which subsist in a long civilised country, that such anarchy should continue." The Morning Advertiser, referring to the subject of the division last night in the Commons, on thp education measure, remarks as follows :—" Of Liberal Members the following were foolish enough to allow themselves to be shut out from the division :—Mr. Sergeant Wilde, Mr. Berkeley, and the Earl of Surrey, whose place in the household may nut improperly be given to somebody more attentive to his Parliamentary duties; and indeed it may Le said cf all Liberals that at such times as these the people have a right to expect a somewhat closer attendance at the House. Their unminifulness is a good text for en couragement to their opponents; and is, therefore, the more censurable, and deserving of such pains and penalties as either the Government or the country can inflict upon the parties for their remissness, which we trust will not be spired upon this occasion." SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. TATTERSALL'S-(YESTERDAY.) Goonwoon cur. 6 to 1 agst Mr. Holdsworth na. Deception—offered 6 to 1 agst Lord Westminster's Richard Roe—taken 9 to '2 agst Mr. Ferguson's Harkaway—taken 10 to 1 agst Mr. St. Paul's Galewood—taken THE GOODWOOD STAKES. 10 to 1 agst Ruby—taken 14 to 1 agst- Marquis of Westminster's Lord Mayor—taken 16 to 1 agst Mr. IladJiffe's Wee Willie—taken 20 to I agst Lord Eglintoun's St. Andrew 20 to •1 agst Morella 20 to 1 agst Mr. A. Pearson na. Romania—taken 20 to 1 agst LOrd Jersey's Joannina—taken 20 to 1 agst Mr. Isaac's 1-am-not-aware ' . 22 to I agst F. Craven's 1-wish-you-may-get-it 22 to 1 agst Mr. J. Garrard's Cornborough 0 5 to 1 agst St. Martin 25 to 1 agst St. Bennett—taken 25 to 1 agst Mr. Stanhope's Caroline Elvina—taken 30 to 1 agst Mervan—taken 500 to 10 agst 111 r. Ilsnildsworth's Taunton JULY STAKES. 6 to 1 agst St. Preux—taken 7 to 2 agst Hellespont—taken 9 to 1 agst Stamboul—taken 10 to 1 agst Liffy—offered 10 to l agst Crucifix—taken THE ST. LEGER. 3 to 1 agst Mr. Ridedale's Bloomsbury 10 to 1 agst The Commodore—taken 14 to 1 agst Provost 15 to 1 agst Charles the Twelfth L—taken 20 to 1 agst Lord Mayer The room was crowded, but very little doing on the St. Leger, July Stakes, or the Cup. THE LATE DERBY AND OARS. The state of excitement in which the Bloomsbury affair has kept the racing community for the last five or'six weeks, instead of diminishing, has been increased in the course of thd last three or four days by 'some rumours respecting the pedigree of Deception, the winner of the Oaks and the second for the Derby. T o put the matter clearly, it- is proper to give the Pedigree of Deception's dam, Lady Stumps, as it appears in volume iv. cf the Stud Book. She is stated to be " bred by —, in —; got by Tramp, darn by Cervantes, out of Fanny, by Sir Peter." ( The breeder and year of foalingare not given.) Now, on referring to Fanny (vol. ii.), it appears that she produced two fillies by Cervantes, viz., in 1818 a ch. f. Ursula, and in 1821 a bay filly, which is without a name. The objection raised is that lady Stumps was out of Ursula, and not out of the other mare, to which her pedigree clearly has reference. This view of it is supported by the statement of Mr. Tilburn, the aam - - tiOneer, of Doncaster, who declares that in 1828, besides ether blood stock belonging to Lord Fitzwilliam, he sold a bay year ling filly, which he believes to be Lady Sturnps, by auction, to a Mr. Wildon, for 20 guineas, and that in the adveitisement of sale it was described as a " bay yearling filly, by Tramp, out of Ursula, byCervantes, gratuhlam Fanny,"&c. Ursula's produce will be found in the Stud Book, that given f0r1827 being a "bay filly by Tramp," but no trace of the other Cervantes marl is discoverable. Such is the ease as set forth by those who assert the ineor rectucts of the pedigree, and the consequent disqualification ; farther to support it they refer to the lith rule of the Jockey Club, but as the friends of Deception rely on the very same rule it will not be amiss to give it :.--" In all all nominations and entrances, for stakes, subscriptions, and plate, of horses, &e., which have have not started before the time of naming or entering, the sire, dam, and grandam of the horse, &e., named or entered must be mentioned, it known, unless the dam has a name which is to be found in the Stud Book or Racing THE SUN. LONDON. TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1839. Calendar, in which case the name of the sire and dam will be sufficient. If the horse, &c., named or entered, be own brother or sister to any horse, &c., having a name in the Stud Book or tracing Calendar, it will be sufficient to name it as such. If the dam or grandam is not know n, the . sire of the horse, &c., must be mentioned, together with such other particulsrs as will be sufficient to identify the animal. If a horse has once appeared in the Racing Calendar by a name and his pedigree, it will be sufficient afterwards to mention him by his name only, even though he has never started. If the dam was covered by more than_one stallion the names of all of them must be mentioned." It is only necessary to add that the assailants rely on that part of the rule beginning—" If the horse," &c., and that the other party trust to the previous por tion of it. Whether the matter will come before the Jockey Club or a Court of Law is not yet known. Mr. Wreford having withdrawn his objection made to De ception after she won the Produce Stakes at Bath, at present there is " no case before the Court." THE PAULINE AFFAIR. The Stewards of the Jockey Club met yesterday, and gave the following opinion on this case : " The Stewards of the Jockey Club, having taken into con sideration the 'evidence in support of the charge against the owner and rider of Pauline in the , race for the'Palace Stakes at Hampton, and the explanation given by the former, in which lie admitted that he ordered his jockey to lose the race to pre vent his mare being claimed, are of opinion that the whole pro. seeding was fraudulent and' disgraceful, and that bets on this race lost to Mr. Theobald or Curwcn should not be paid. (Signed) " BEAUFORT. " STRADBROKE (for Lord Chesterfield). " H. J. RODS. " June 24, 1839." PRICE OF SUGAR. EFFECT OF MONOPOLY. Table sheaving the ex-duty price of West India Sugar, in Mincing-lane, and comparing the same against that of Foreign Sugars:— London, June 22:1839. The Gazette of last night quotes the average Per cwt. price of British Plantation Muscovado Sugar exclusive of duty at The actual quantity sold on which the above price is computed, consisted of 1,667 hhds., 211 trs. and 61 brls. Manilla Sugars of a similar quality to the average of %Vest Indian Sugar are worth 243. 6d. per cwt.—being 17s. le:s than the %Vest India. The produce of the refineries working Foreign' Sugar under lock for exportation only has been sold th:s week ; as follows : Per cat. No. 1. Refined Sugar, equal in quality to double refined, at No. 2. Bastard do. • 2iii. Od. No. 3. Treacle l4. Od. The produce of the refineries working West India Sugar and Molasses, exclusive of the duty for home con sumption has been sold this week as follows : Pa- cwt. Refined Sugar, same quality as No. 1 above, at 58s. Od. Bastard do do 2 40s. 6.!. Treacle do 3 31s. 01 The British nation, therefore, pays for Refined Sugar For Bastard do Fur Treacle more than Foreign nations pay for articles of exactly a similar quality, and which are all manufactured and sold in London. There has been no exportation of Refined made from Weat India Sugar since the reduction of the bounty in October last, neither will any shipments take place until the price of British Raw Sugar falls from 41s. 64. to 265. per cwt., and then only provided the price of the Refined Sugar in the Foreign markets remained at 345. 6d. per t. It is argued that the stocks on hand, both of British Sugars and of free labour Foreign Sugars, as well as the quantities of both sorts to arrive, will not together exceed the demand of the nation, and that therefore the price, even in the event of free labour Foreign Sugars being ad mitted for home use at the West India Sugar duty, would not fall so los as to bring them within the operating powers of the Bounty ,Act; and therefore, happen what may, that Act, if renewed this year, will be a dead letter. We have secn the statements on which this argument is based, and suppOsing them to be accurate, we admit that the chance of the bounty coming into mischievoui activity for the next twelvemonth, is beyond the pale of probability ; abut, however, we contend fur is this, that to renew the Bounty Act under the circumstances explained will be an useless piece of legislation, and a waste of just so much time and parchment as the document may require, for the futile purpose of displaying the intention of the Govern ment to bolster up, if it can, the price of West India Sugar, at the expense of the nation. Furthermore, that this shadow of a protection will be mistaken by the public at large fur the substance, and will have the uncUaritable effect of exposing the Colonist to odium unconapensated by any advantage. ' When dealings are to be fair and open there needs no mystery. MONEY MARKET and CITY NEWS HE 11 AL D.—We have ever alluded to the affairs of the BaLlt of E. gland with what we choose to term a deter mined impartiality, and looking at all circumstances, we believe that, were we called upon for an opinion, it would be our duty to essert that at this juncture the whole of the commercial and monetary interests should j,An in sup porting the Bank of England :, the more so, as in its na tional character it is made to appear but the monetary godmother of the weakest administration that ever pre vailed since the tumble down of Lord North's most me morable coalition, whilst its sponsorship, like a wire-worm, undermines its own stability. TIME S.—The private accounts from New York to the 7th inst. are commercially of some interest. The adviccs which had been received by the Great Western of the state of money and commercial affairs here at the date of the 18th ult. had not produced any considerable reduction in the prices of cotton or of. American securities, which, indeed, was hardly to be expected in the few days which intervened between her arrival out on the Ist and the sailing of the packet-ship Rochester, on the 6th instant, which. reached Liverpool on Saturday last. The slight depression in prices, therefore, is scarcely worth.alledmg to, for. with respect to cotton there had not been time sufficient to ascertain what would be - the effect of the unfavourable intelligence by the Great Western upon the great cotton marts of New Orleans, Mobile, and other places in the interior. The more immediate result upon the New York market was, however, sufficiently apparent in the remarkable stagnation of business which ensued. As every succeeding arrival out there could only communicate adviccs less encouraging still of the situation of money and commercial affairs here, no improvement on that side need be looked for. Ad the accounts now received speak in the most decisive terms of the very promising appear ance of the new crop in all the cotton-growing ttates which, it is assertd, would greatly exceed 'in quantity that of last year, as the planters had been induced by the high prices to gush cultivation to" the greatest possible extent. • CHRONlCLE.—Everything remains in the same state of apprehension and doubt, and the letters from the coun try this morning are of a nature to increase rather than diminish this feeling. It is as yet impossible to ascertain what may be expected to result in the manufacturing dis tricts from the recent measures adopted by the Bank of England; for the letters are generally written under consi derable excitement, and paities there seem to have been taken wholly by surprise, and to be completely paralized. In the city the opinion is decidedly that most prejudicial, consequences will ensue; but it must, however, be borne in mind that 'the commercial community were never in a better position to bear up independently against such a shock ; for there has latterly been so little business going on that the amount of bills afloat is comparatively quite small. It is affirmed that there is little more than 2,000;000/. of specie in the coffers of the Bank. The mercantile men, moreover, deny that the proceedings of the Bank will have the desired effect Of bringing down the prices of articles of export, and thereby right the Ex changes ; at least its operation will be long, while the shipments of bullion wit/ continue in the meantime. A very considerable amount of Stork has been disposed of to-day in the English Stock Market, and at a great re duction of price. In the morning affairs looked despond ing in the extreme, and most extravagant rates were given for loans of money until the opening ; but in the after noon, when the supplies for the day had been obtained, money became less scarce, and it could be borrowed indeed at five per cent until to-morrow, but for the account it was still at 10 and 12 per cent. This little improvement in the appearance of money occasioned a partial rally in the prices. Foreign Securities continue extremely languid, without any business of moment going on in them. The settling day in this market, which takes place on Friday, is looked for with much apprehension, as it is well known a considerable amount of money has been lent upon tl e deposit of Foreign Securities, which it is expected lain now be all called in to enable the lenders, not only to get a higher rate of interest, but have the security of British Stock. Some mischief it is thought may pos sibly occur; but as the probabilities arc seen now it is hoped that every preparation will be made to prevent anything unpleasant. The operations of the English Market destroyed the effect which the intelligence from Portugal was expected, to have produced on the value of that Stock. ROYAL MARRIAGE.-STUTTGARD, JUNE 19.—Yesterday afternoon, between four and five o'clock, the marriage of his Royal Highness the Hereditary Prince William Alexander of Orange with her Royal Highness the Princess F,ederica Sophia Matilda of Wurtemburg, second daughter of the King, was celebrated in the marble saloon of the Royal Palace by the Councillor of the Con sistory and Court Chaplain Charles Grunelsen, in presence of the members of the Royal family, his Royal Highness the Prince of Orange, of the Margrave and of the Mar gravine William of Baden, of all the Court, of the Mi nisters and Diplomatic Corps. After the marriage cere mony the Royal couple were felicitated. BURGLARY PREVENTED.—The Police reports of almost every day abound with instances of depredations being committed in consequence of the use of insecure leek's. S. Mordan and Co. therefore, tak:: this oppor tunity to recommend thcir Patent Safety Lock, to the notice of the public, as an inviolable protector for every species of property. " This is the most secure, the best constructed, and the most reasonable lock that can be purchased, no establishment should be without h."— Manufactory, 22A, City road. TIIE LATE FATAL ACCIDENT ON TUE EASTEIiN COUNTIES RAILWAY.—An inquest was held on Saturday at Stiatferd. The Jury, on hearing the e,a-id dence, declared their opinion to be that the accidentnd 3 had b the been occasioned altogether by over spe ed, o n f d the th C er oemx engine man having, in this respect, disobey press orders of the engineer and chief officers piny. The engine is scarcely damagedc,tshe boiler r i ot having burst, as erroneously stated in some of the reports of the accident. There were thirty five passengers in th e train, not one of whom received the slightest injury, ow i ng to the judicious arrangemen t of fastening the carr i age doors, which prevented their attempting to ju m p out. The slight injury d o ne" to the rails was immediately repaired, and the trains are now runnin g in re g ul ar succession. , E‘ ENIN(3 EDITION. THE MARKETS.-(YESTERDAY. PRICES OF SEEDS.-June 24. to Cwt. Per Quarter. New English Red Cioser...7os. 90, St. Foin 40s, Old I) t:o Ditto... .. -a. -s Rye Grass 256. New Foreign]Ditto ...60.. 10s. 80s. inicey Grass ......s. old- 1 )itto Ditto -s. -s. -1. Linsee.4, for feeding 44s New White Clover sos. (',os. 70s. i Ditto, for sawing -s. Old Ditto Ditto . -s. -s. Ditto, for crushing.--s New Trefoil 17... 20s 243. Canary -s Old I).tto -R. 123 t.'25 Hemp -s Trefoil= Ills. lls 133 Per Bushel. English Carraway -s. 48s. 52: White Mustard-11s. t'.?.. 154. fd Foreign Ditto -s. 4tts. 50s Brown Ditto lss od. ti:2 , " Coriander. -s 2 11 * 2.), Tares 4s rd 5, , .. ( 1 Rapeseed, Engl., h line :per Lest) 30/. 38, ...... Foreign 34:. 30 PRICES OF POTATOES AT Si'ITA I. El El.D' York Reds (from vessel) 5/ Cs. to Ii! Os. per ton. Scotch Reds ditto . , 4l. es. to 51. 0,. ditto Kidneys 1/. Vs. to 0/. its. ditto Shan's 9 . 13t. to 31. ss. dicta PRICES OF HOPS.-June 21. Farnham r0ck,,,,. (per cwt.) 6 Or. 7/, 15, to 9/. ss. .- East K .to Pockets.-- 4, 10s. 51. 13- to 3 8 . Ditto 8ag5..... Mid Kent Pockets 3l. 15s. 51. ss. to 8 , ft^ Date, Bags 3.. 10,. 4 , 10. is, 1 - is Sussex 9 ' 3.- 31 15s to 4, 10- Yearlings 2l. 10s. 3i. 3s. to 4/. 4'. ' Old 11Ids ..., Os. 18., li. 10s. to 2- . 2s. COAL MARKET.-June 21. s. d' Adair's ' l9 1 Borden Main l9 I, Holywell Main '0 I Original V indsor's Pontop 211 Ci Antall Hartley l9 I, Willington Walls End Hilda l9 I Walls End Ho'spur Walls Ead Peered' Walls End Belmont 2l 0, chips arrived since last 445 414 355. 4O► 404. 150 525. 54 58s. MO 41s. 501 VOs. 911 s - - F. d. Walls Endßraddyll'sHetton 21 9 Wa Is En - 1 Haswell 2l' Wal - s r - nd Het:on Walls End Lambton ...... ;2.:l Walla End Stewart's -2 S Walls End Kenn° Walls End Adelaide Walls End Barrett Walls End Tennant 221 3 Hartley 2l 9 market-dly, 45. COUNTRY CORN MARKETS. Wheat. Barley.. I Oats. Beans. Peae. Per Quarter.' s. to a. a. to s. la.toa.la. to a. a. 4. Ihston - Gainaborough ' Si 37 '2B 4t Grantham Grimsl)Y liorncastie - Lincoln 7O 77 3t 42 20 29 42 50 Spalding — 90 35 l 21 49 I Stamford York - NEWCASTLE CORN EXCHANGE—June:?, ' New. - (lid. Wheat, Northuniteerland 50.. 72s - Norfolk and Suffolk... ........ .... tiSs 7ii,. - Berwick and Scotch €2 , . Ci 5....... -I -s. - Foreign -s. _.. ... 5), 70s. Rye, Nerf,ll , and Suffolk 32s 3S, ...A. ~ . s. - Foreign s. --8 Barley, Malting, Norfolk And SutTiOk... 41s. 436 -8. --s, - Grinding and Feeding ' l 4s. :30s. Malt, Nortink and Sullblk 66s 16, ...... -s. -4. Beans, Small -s. -s 40 473. --- - Tick .. s -5....... 435. 4 Prase, White sos. 525..... ..-11. --.. - Gray - S. -s. les, Northumberland, Potatoe. ..... . ..... Feed - 24s 25s ... '..'si. 26, Foreign —K. 4 —6. —s. Flour (per sack) WAKEFIELD CORN MARKET —June 21. Irdeat, Red, Norfolk and So Oldk ..... —s. 6F.s. to 71-t. fine 72'. ---- Lin. and Cam. ----- Yorkshire —a. 58a. to 6 2s. fine 66, Vi , hite . --- Foreign, tied —s. —s. to fki , . fine 707. White —a. —s. to —4 nne 75 , Barley, Norfolk and Sufodk -- Lincolnshire IliS. to 375. fine 42$ ----- Yorkshire Wold Foreign Beans, Small ------ Tick -c. to 40s. fine ;AL Oats, Potato s. to 30s. fine 34' -- Poland —s. —a. to 30;. fine f4s. vriezland and Small —4. —s. to :Xis. fine -Si. —t•.: sling ........ !M. to l4d, per Stone Shelling Malt ..,..e. 4 N. fine 4,35. per LolVia Rapeseed ITCH MARKET Wheat. Barley. Oats. Beans. Oatmeal.' 7C to 75 32 to 35 23 to 29 —to 44 to .4 7 • Berwick 3i 32 23 30 20 2 - 2 39 36 43 Co'dstrearn Cupar F Be) 46 65 26 31 18 22. 2:1 26 Dunbar fit 70 31 38 26 132 40 42 40 42 Eight Inverness 46 54 2 • . 27 16 23 32 34 Kirkaldy 64 '77 tn 31 20 45 4(4 43 Perth sie, of the measure varies throughout the country. HADDINGION CORN MARKET.—June 21. Wheat. Barley. I Oats. rewte, tteA n O. First 7ss Od l 44s 6.1 I 38, Od I 4.3 s Od 48 g ° Second I rtia lid 41s Od Od 44s Od 2 A Third 62s Od 43s 0.1 32s 04 I 42. Od v" Ave, tee 31. 7 ,, 114. 4.12 t. s. DA ',KEITH Ct)ltN MARKET.—June Wheat. Barley. oats. ce,e. Berm s. First 73 a Od 41. Od 40, 64 47a 81 47 ' "i; Second 1 ((la Od 311 s Od I 3is Od 44 , 0 , 1 44 , O. Third. I 50s Od 135 , 01 24s Pd 10 0; 40 Od EDINBURGH CORN MARKET—June 19. We had a large supply of all kinds of Grain to-day, and the sale' were rather dull. Wheat. Barley. Oats. Pease. fle,nci First 76‘04. ed. 37s fd. 465. Od 40 i • Sceond 6B 0•39 0 33 0143 0 43 0 third Average price of IVheat 3/. SY. 22. PRICES OF PROVISIONS, 4C. deer, per lb. Os.. el. to os.mt.i Fresh Butter, its. Is. 0-I. to 1 2 0 • 1 • 11tittnn------ 0 0 0 8 !Salt 0 9 I 11 .7 1 A n 10..) PRICES OF PR deer, per lb. Os. I d. 6 - itia.ml. _ 0 l 0 8 0 7 1 0 fl 5 0 7 Lamb, pf.. , r qr. 5 0 7 0 0 45 0 2uhrtcrn Loaf Ili 0 10 Potatoes, 141 b. 0 6 0 0 )VISIONS, KG Fresh Butter, 114. Is. 0.1. to I`. Salt 0 9 Ditto, per Cu 1043 Eggs, per 0 0 Oat Straw ;k:4 - .;.,,12 0 15 2 Wheat Ditti,..-10 0 1 2 il.rley Ditto —9 0 41 0 Hay, per I 0 1 EDINVORGH MEAL, MARKET.—June IS. There was a middling supply of Oatmeal at this day's market, an sales were ra her heavy. Per Sack of 28C1b. 1 tarp. rust Oatmeal Second ditto, 8..... I 15 Peaseleval 1 I t tf rot Barley—No. ',pet cwt.! Betas GLASOOW CORN A moderate business doil4 Wheat, i,cc s. I. s. d. British, old ll7oln3'i 0 new Canada, free 34 0 - :16 0 Irish Barley, prr 32011 English 3l 0 32 0 Scottish 25 0 3 0 29 0 Per Stone of 141 h. in. r . First Oatmeal Seroinli"ltto Barleyveal ...... 2 0 reaseir ea! * 2 0 —4th,lBs. 1. 2es MARKET.—June 19. in Gran; prices steady. • Oats, per '..:ti4lti. D. d. s. it. Irist British Bc.,itis, per •26011). English Scottish Pease, Scottish tratmeal,per Rolti 2.3 0 V; 0 Flour, per 2Niti ;";;CI 0 ..i_i O CORNWALL MARKETS. (Calculated at 24 gallons to the bushel,► Whe. i. Barley. I Oats. d. to r, d. s d. to s J- ' 25 0 0 12 C' 0 9 friro..... Holston* s. d. to is. - di 0 in 0 8 g St. Austell 0 ,i 5 0 - 0 961 0 S, Bodi-in — 0 24 ti 0 ,5 0 I 0 Liskeard 0 1:2 I' - 0 s. 6 0 7 0 Launceston - 0 2 0 Camelford l2l 0 21 0— 0 it, C. 7 0 . Penzance. 124 0 26 0 0 11 0, ~; 0 MINI SG INTELLIGENCE, Tcns.Cwt•g r Quantity of Copper Ore sold 3,4 - 2 21 ° Quantity of tine Cepper 2l I ° Average Produce sg „, Amount of 5a!e,•20,250/.176 Ud.—Average Standard, -2 t il/ Ws. e. CHURCH RATE REFUSED.—ST. °LAVE'S EKETER.—A vestry meeting was held in this parish OP Thursday se'nnight, convened by the Warden, for the pur pose of making a Church-rate. The Warden stated tha t the Archdeacon bad directed him to hold the vestry , an d if there was a majority against the rate, to return hull th e names of the parishioners who had voted. Mr: James Terrell inquired of the late • Ward e n h ow the rents some premises belonging to the parish, for the repairs of the church, had been applied during the last year ; and e for it appeared that nearly the wh o l e h a d• b een applied the the service of the Church, and not the repairs of building. It appeared, further, th a t the repairs re quired for the ensuing year would b e ve ry much less than the prospective income, so that the parishion ers who were Dissenters were to be taxed for providing the sacramental wine, cleik's salary, and other expen di-ure in the ministration of the ceremonies of another sect ; Mr. Terrell stated that it wa s c l ear that the chu rch held property in this country of the value of sir millions per annum at the least, retaining these splendid reve nue `' to the exclusion of all oth e r sects—and were not coact' ::ith this princely income, but now sought to take from _ the pockets of those who diss e nt e d f rom th e m the exll diture attending on their form of worship. It was (1)5. gracfful to the Churchmen that they did not follow the example set them by their fellow-Christians. and PI their own expenses. It was then moved by Mr. Terrell and seconded by Mr. Evans, that the meeting do adP u r n for twelve months—which was carried by fourteen to three. The Warden proposed to take the names:of the parishioners win voted, as requested by the Arcbdea,col, but this was refused. The resolution was entered as carried by the above majority. The three Churchmen only signed the book ; and the meeting adjournedi ac cording to the resolution.-- Western Times. • - SALMON FlSHlNG.—Thedry . ness of the weather has affected the salmon fishings ; the want of fresh water operates in preventing the fish from exchanging the frith for the rivers. The Beauly has hitherto been pretty ductive, but is falling off, owing to the low state _td th e tream.—lnverness Courier. SECOND-HAND SILVER WATCHES A variety of some dozens may be selected from, Price Guinea. each ; some rather more modern, Two and a ' Guineas each ; and an assortment quite equal to nov, Tbre c Guineas each. The w h o l e h ave b een carefully examined' and are warranted. T. COX SAVORY, Watchmaker, 47, Cornhill, London, { Seven Doors from Gracechurch-street). N.,IL Second-hand Watches purchased in exchange. PLATED CORNER DISHES, SEV N s—v. GUINEAS the SET.—A. B. SAVORY and S o ;`' Manufacturing Silversmiths, No. 14, Cornhill, London,;, 7; posite the Bank of England), submit for, choice in their Rooms, many patterns of strongly Plat e d Corner Disne ! , with Silver flanilles and Shields, for Engraving, from 7 Gui neas to 10 Guineas the Se: of four ; by removing the handles from the covers, eight dishes arc formed when required. N.B. A Pamphlet of the Prices of Plate may be had on appli cation. BIRTH On the 20th inst., at DunoHy, the lady of Ca p tai n MacDoti gall, of MacDougall, R.N., of a s on ' On the 20th inst., at Walme r, the lady of Sir Keith A. Jack son, Bart., her Majesty's 4th Light Dragoons, of a daughter. On the 24th inst., at Streatham, Mrs. W. Senhouse ,Gaits kell, of a son. • MARRIED, On the 22d s . q i % s a t r c , , at to G M r a e r e y n , '‘ S i e c c h o ' r, G d e d ° a r u g ;ll er Stanleyof F. j e " ,: c c i o l j° • • o n the '22d inst., at. St. George's, Hanorer-square, Joseph 133 31 . P., eldest son of Joseph Bailey, Esq. , 31.1,T i • u ' otGCanE'q ' usk . - park. Breconshire, to Elizabeth .Vary, only child of W. C. Russell, Esq., of Leamington, High Sheriff for the county of Worcester ; and at the seine time, James Green field, Esq., of Bydd-Gaer, Anglesea, High Sheriff of the same county, to !Margaret, second daughter of Joseph Bailey, Esq., M. P. DIED. On the 19th inst., at the Vicarage, Chalfont St. Peter's, Bucks, Thomas Gleed, Esq., of Reading, Berks. On the 21st inst., at Ardwick, near Manchester, Mary, the youngest and last surviving daughter of the late Tomas John son, Esq., of Tildesley, Lancashire, aged 82. On the 21st inst., at Haverfordwest, Ann, relict of the late James Rule, Esq., of Clapham-common, Surrey, aged 65. London : Printed and Published by MURDO YOUNG , of No. 112, Strand, at The Sun nice, No. 112, Stran d, in the county of Middlesex.—Tuesday, June 25, 1&313•