The Sun. — London, England, 1821-03-06 00:00:00

I With on Wetintiday. He hoped the Papers moved far would be_pt - oduced befur. that (lay. The Committee of Suppliwas fixed for. Wednesday.. 'f he Irish Chancery Court Bill ►►ent thrOugh a Committee. The Report was received and ordered to be taken into further consideration ott Monday. The Report of the Lunatics Stoclaransfer Bill was agreed to. TRANSFER OF S LOCK; Mr. CURWEN said, he never rose with more painful feelings than he now did, accused as ID. was of sheaving in the motion, which it was his duty to make, little regard to private property and public credit. He, however, did not - admit the justice of the charge; but it was fair to avow, that iu moving for an account of the Stock transferred at the Bank of Engladd, in the last ten years, his direct purpose was to point it out as an object of taxation. The first Loan Act, which passed in the reign of William and Mary, contained a clause in which it was said, that the annuity paid to the public creditor should be exempt from all burthens. In this, he doubted whether Parliament had not exceeded its power, for there was an inherent necessity in the nature of all Government, that property should pay for the protection afforded it: But at that time the capital in the country was so small, that it was necessary that favourable offers should be made .to induce individuals -to advance loans. Nor was it then of great consequence whether the small amount of time Debt was exempt or not. But now that the Debt had grown up to be equal to the whole funded property of the kingdom, it was very important whether it should be entirely exempt from taxation. He contended that even if there had been no in stance in which a tax had been imposed on it, it could not claim an exemption, but the fact was, it had been subjected to the Property Tax, and was now subject to the Legacy Duty. There Were grave authorities which supported him in saying that it should take its share of the bur thefts of the country. In the case of Clerken well, in the reign of George 1., the Judges de- Oared, that property in the funds might be made available to the support of the Poor. And in a Case from Norwich, Lord Ellenborough distin guished money in the funds from money lent on bond ; and stated, .that it would be chargeable with poor rates, but for this circumstance, that it could not 'be shewit in any initance to be - visible property, 'arising, within a particular 'parish. These declarations, which slimed that the funds were, in principle, chargeable, spewed ,tbat . • they were fairly chargeable with Taxes. But, if the Fundholders could plead an exemp, tion, they should be : the first class to forego it, as was so much their interest to encourage the payment of Taxes, from which they de rived so much. [t was said, it would be fair to tax the Fund-holder to a certain degree, but, it was asked, where would it stop? It Would stop. where it should, for he hoped the House would never tax .any class beyond its fair proportion. — It . •was not sound reasoning to resist a fair and equal Tax, lest an unequal one should be im -iiosed. The distress of the country was now quite as great as. it had been iu France at the beginning of the Revolution,- and, they should remember, that it, was the obstinacy of the privileged orders, in pleading their exemption:, which brought on th! calamities which ensued. As - he thought, the're was a fair claim in justice and expediency t hat the Funds-should besubject to Taxation, he did not shrink from -the odium of avowing his ° l 3- inion. He moved for a n A c c o unt of all Trans fers of Stock-at the Bank for the last ten years (except that transferred to the Commissioners of the Sinking Fund), distinguishhig each year, and . each species of Stock. The CHANCELLOR of thy EXCHEQUER said, he should oppose the nfoLion, On the broad grounds of the bads which the Honourable Member tad laid forit. He was far from wishing to charge the Honourable Member with aiming at the de struction-of public. credit and private property, ii.nt he was compelled to say that the proposition of the'.llon. Member was fully deserving of all the reprobation that could be bestowed on it. Honourable Member had confounded two very distinct things—a tax on the funds as such,. and a tax the fundsin common with all other PrOperty. The fundholders had submitted to the . Property Tax without a murmur, but to subject them to special taxation would be a violation of the faith which had been pledged to them. It .was stipulated in every Loan till that. there should be no tax on the Transfer' °f Stock, so - that the llon. Member, by proposing 'F•ax upon• Transfers, had taken the bull by the horns, because, if ever such a tax was imposed, !II the arpment against other taxes from the t- reach of public faith was taken away. The %uestion had been Much confused by the asser tion that the debt had been contracted in a de-. Predated currency. In the years in which the lutrency was depreciated, sums were borrowed : i c't" to a greater amount than one fourth of the 1 ,,t, and this was so mixed up with the rest (as .0 one who purchased stock knew in what year ." Particular portion was created) that it was 14 'Possible to trac e it. But even if any could be 1. °i- Incl in the hands of the original holders it wolld be most unjust to tax them on account of depreciation, nor could it be done without ex •l - tf.• rt • og.the principl e to all private bargains which "ere made at the . same time. Any tax that was im :Posed on the funds would less affect the rich fund molder than any other his capital was speedily t ransferred, and would be transferred, on the first intimation of the intention of Parliament, to foreign funds, where he would get a higher 'interest -for his money,—(llear!)—from which ire was now withheld only on account of the sup- Posed superior security atid faith of this country. 4-t. New York or Paris he might lan2,l' at our _taxes. The alarm would soon extend beyond The small fundholders would he alarmed ; the wor4 with all proprietors of stock would be, suave qui petit, and transfer must soots stop for Want of buyers. Then it would be that the cries of distress and ruin would be heard _from the orph ans and widows, and from thousands who (lepended on the funds alone for their support. Who could calculate, too, what the effect on all other property would be, when this vast mass was reduced to nothing The good faith of this corm, try had been its surest stay in times .of danwer, told the measure which would rob En-trland of its public credit, Would deprive it of' its best support,. and: .lay.. it open to "eVei‘y enemy. Ou - these goounds he should give a negative to the motion. •Mr. JofiN MARTIN observed, that as the re striction on the Bank was not a permanent mea sure, so It was known when the public :con tracted loans that an alteration must take place at some time or other In the value of the, currency. After a few words in explanation from the CtiANcELLorI of the ExtitEQuEit, the motion was negatived. Mr. Duonaaa moved for leave to bring in a Bill for the more summary punishment of ju venile delinquents. lie stated, that he intended to confine the operation of the Bill to delinquents under 16 years of age. The Bill was to give power to two Magistrates summarily to comMit them to ; hard labour, in cases of theft to a small amount.—Leave given. IRISH MASTERSHIP IN CHANrERY.—MR. ELLIS. Dr. LUSIIINGTON said, as the motion which he had ,to make directly. affected an Honourable and Learned Gentleman opposite to him, he should discharge the task which, was imposed on him with as much brevity as possible. It was not necessary for him to state that in Courts of Equity, all the most various and complicated questions of property were settled ; that where accounts were to be taken, where the estates of bankrupts, or of lunatics, or minors were, in ques tion, the Courts of Equity had an almost exclu sive jurisdiction. It was not to be concealed, that though justice was ultimately done in these Courts, ,very heavy burthens were Imposed on the suitors by delay, and it was their duty: to see that this great evil was not still further aug mented. The basis on which he should found the motion .which he was about to subunit to the House was, that the honourable Member for Dublin could not discharge the duties of Master in Chancery in Ireland—that he must neglect either his duties as 'Master, or as Member of Parliament ; and that, therefore, as the House had a paramount and compul sory claim on the services of all its Members, the suitors in Chancery must be necessarily the suf ferers. In stating to the House what the duties of the , lion. Member as Master in Chancery were, he . had the very best evidence, that of a Commis sion appointed by the Crown and of the 'lion. Member himself upon oath. The Hon. Member, he should premise, had purchased the resignation of his predecessor, Mr. Walker, in 1807, in pur suance of a long custom (with the evil of which the Hon. Member was not chargeable), though the pchtice had generated a whole Edit r7i of abuses in the administration of jastice in Ireland. No man could read the report of the 'Commis sioners of Inquiry, without perceiving that the -administration of justice 'in • Ireland, for the last 30 years, had been a system of corruption, and was disgraceful to those by whom it was' admi nistered (Hear, hear From the Report of the Commissioners it appeared, that one of the six Clerks had charged 1297 at tendances in a single cause, Without hay. ing attended even once.—(lfear, )rear, hear!) — This was only one of the many abuses which pre vailed up to the present day, to the great injury of the suitors in the different Courts. The lion. and Learned Member (Mr. Ellis) entered upon his office of Master in Chancery in 1 g 06 .- examined upon oath before the Commissioners, he stated that the duties of his office were various and difficult. Here the Hon. Member referred to the Report, in which it was. stated that the Masters in Chancery had to attend to the cases Of lunatics, taxing bills of costs, bankrupts' affairs, and, in short, whatever it might please - the Lord Chancellor to refer to them. Could any one doubt that the absence of any Gentlemen who had such various duties to attend to, must be productive of the most serious injury to the suitors in the Irish Court of Chancery ?—(Hear !)—The next ques tion put to the lion, and Learned Membe r by the Commissioners was, as tolhe length of time lahich ;was necessary to perform those duties, _Upon this point he had the most unanswerable evidence —the evidence of the lion. and Learned Member himself, which was corroborated by two other Masters in Chancery. The Hon. and Learned • Member stated, that the duties of his office re quired his personal attendance during ten.months of the year—that he attended in his office from eleven till four every day in Term, and out of Term, more or less, as business reqaired—and that he also attended in his office in the evening, for the dispatch of various branches of business connected with his situation. How, then, could - any Gentleman so occupied attend to his Par liamentary duties without injury to the .pub lic ? It was impossible that a man, under such circumstances, could discharge his duty, unles he could make 38 hours out of 21. In ano ther part of the Report, the Honourable and Learned Member stated, that the duties of, his office could trot be discharged by, deputy.— (Ifear!)—lie trusted, then, that notwithstanding the desperate situation in which motions arising from his (Mr. Lushington's) side 'of the House were generally placed,•that the Members of the Sister Kingdom, at least, would get rid of party prejudices, and exert themselves in favour of their country—that they would reflect upon the situation in which recent circumstances had plac ed that unhappy country, and endeavour to pre serve to the suitors in the Courts at least a wreck of their fortunes. lie presumed that the-lion. and Learned Member (Mr. or his Friends Would say, that the motion with which he was about to conclude, would operate as an ex post facto law, and go on to argue that no such motion should be made until all the mischief complained of was done. If he knew any thing of the nature of an ex post facto law, his motion woold be totally different from it. He would allow the mischief 'to be done rather than introduce an e.c post „facto' law to prevent it. —The fact, however, was this. The Honourable, Member's office was conferred daring pleasure. Now, if he could chew that the holding of such an office was inc:Aapatible with the ditties of a Member of Parliament, he trusted that he would establish his case. 'the' • lion. Member was appointed to his office in 1806, and he (Dr. Lushington) was happy to say that h e w a s f u lly qualified for-the duties imposed upon him ; but this was an additional reason why he objected to the • abscnaa of the Honourable and- Learned Gentleman from his Ace: Two Or three . MA3- ters in Chancery had been recently aPpointed; none of whom could be supposed to pdSsess the knowledge, and experience of the Hon. Learned Member. The fees of office were stated by the Hon. Member himself to amount to 37101. a year. lie meant no imputation. uPon the Hon. and Learned Member, when he state‘F that those fees had been pririCipally created, Niiithiti the last 25 years,.by the Masters themselves,:for their own benefit. in addition to the fees, the Hon. Member had a salary of 400!. a year, which with half the fees of the examining clerk, made the situation worth 44001. a year—a sum as large as the salary of any Puisue Judge of this country. The Thin: Member; in support of hiS argument, quoted the cases of several Members who had been arrested by cirder of the House, though their excuse was hating gone to attend the ditties of publiC offices in Ireland. SuppoSe that a call of the House were td take place ; would it be rt" good answer on the pai't of the Hon. and Learned Member to say, that he was engaged'in into a complitated and difficult question con nected with his office? The Hon. Member; allud ing to the previous discuSsiOns on this question, observed, that the Noble Lord soppoSite (Lord , Castlereagh) and a Right Hon: Friend of his now abroad (Mr. Canidog) ,lead declared; that in the event of the HonoUrable Member's wishing to retain both his seat and his office, they had not the slightest objection t.. nicving an Ad dress to the Crown, praying his removal fr 0 7 .11 his situation of Master in Chancery.-411ear, hear.) This he had heard from the Noble Lord; and he now called upon him to make good his assertion. The .lionh Menther, after some further obseTva tions, concluded by moving, a series of Resolu tions, the purport of which was ; that the situa tion of Master in Chancery (Ireland) required the constant attendance of the person filling that office ; and that Thomas Ellis, Esq. Master in Chancery, who had been recently elected Mem ber of Parliament•for the City of Pullin!), was in capable of efficiently discharging both these duties. The Hon. Member said, he meant to follow this motion up by another, praying an Address to the. Crown for the dismissal of Thomas Ellis, Esq. from his office of Master in Chancery in Ireland. Mr. LENNARD, in seconding the motion, sz4id it was impossible that the Hon. and Learned. Member could be allowed to abandon the duties of an oflite for which .he was paid. With re._ spect .to the purchase of the office he (Mr..L.) really could not trust himself in expressing his opinion upon it; but it was perfectly clear that no man could serve two masters, or could serve two offices,-where one was inconsistent with the other. The lion. and Learned Member could: not claim the Royal privilege of legal contiguity. With respect to the condition, it must be per fectly clear that even if the condition were not expressed, it must .be implied, and that the of fice shotild be held only while the officer dis charged its . duties. 'The place was only tellable whilst the duties were properly discharged. It was a duty inconsistent with the discharge of the duties of a Member of that House. Mr. Ellis was virtually incompetent to perform both duties. Feeling the impossibility of a person in the si tuation of Mr. Ellis doing justice t o th e so li- ors :4 l Chancery, he should second the motion of his. Hon. and beamed Friend. Mr. ELLIS was about to address the Tlonse,when The SPEAKER observed, that a difficulty pre sented itself to his mind upon this question.— When any motion respecting the privilege of the House, or inculpatory of any Member, was brought forward, the form was to allow the Member to address the House before the ques tion was read from the Chair, and then that such Alember should retire. It would be for the House to decide how far the present question came within that regulation. Mr. W. WYNN was of opinion, that, on the present occasion, the lion. and Learned Member (Mr. Ellis) ought to be heard before the ques tion was read from the Chair. The SeEAKEn felt that if any doubt existed, it would be better to allow the Hon. Gentlermn to address the hion , ,e, and retire, before the clues= tion was put. By doing this no harm could ar rive, whereas by a different mode of proceeding, they might create a' very inconvenient precedent. _ _ _ . Et.t.ts then roe.—He did not mean to answer the arguments of the Hon. Gentleman who went before i►im, but to state a few facts. He could not help observing, that the usual decorum was not observed on this occasion. —(No, no l) — He maintained that exasperated statements had been made respecting himself perSonally,:.which the parties were not justified in making. He felt that his case - was identified with -the constituent body of the empire, and he would uot, by yield ing to the present attack, abandon their, rights. The Hon. Member then proceeded to give an ac count of the var►ous duties lie had to perform in his office, and which duties he always carefully attend ed to. When he was in the city of Dublin, he con stantly attended in his office, whether there was business to be done or not ; but it (lid not follow that he ►night not be occasionally absen'. The duties of Masters in the Irish Chancery, were different from those in England ; for it was 'there a matter of indifference which -of the Mas ters executed any order of the Court ; and if, one Master happened to be absent, 'another was always found equally competent to do the duty.' A great deal had been said of the delays in. Chancery, but he could declare to the !louse, that: the Lord Chancellor of Ireland never-rose any one day from his Court until he discharged- every -paper before him ; and the day he himself sut out from D u blin, he had not left an un-' finished paper on his desk. The Masters, by an arrangement among themselves, allowed one Master to . be absent two or three months in . the year. This indulge Ace was allowed him ; and after his absence of three months, h-e•-took the duty of the Master who - had :acted for him in his, absence ; and, by that system of rotation, ti►e business of the Court was never suspended. for a single moment. The question now before the House was one which did not so much affect his office, as whether Dublin should be deprived of its franchise. Me should now retire, and leave it to the HouSe to decide on his case. If it should be the pleasure of the !louse to remove him from. .; . . . he should haee the consolation . to reflect, that his last speech there. was uttered in defence of the violated rights of an inulividdal. Mr. Pier. contended that the 11 tiiise - could have no right to exclude a err her oil the, mere presumption that he woold hit likely to neglect his duty. ; ,The Ifoose might as well.eachide fill the Officers•of the Army and Naey who held seats in it, and who were .olifiged td he absent (hiring a great par:. of. their 61:Ica The actep twice of Commissions in the rt,uy and Navy 'by nembers of that House did not cause them to vacate. their seats ; even their_ constituents did not call on them so give up their seats after they got the Commissions. But_ the Case was much ,streuger lucre ; for the.electOrs chose the Hon. and Learned Gentleman at the time they knew liC filled his present office. The case of Meals hers smut abroad as Ambassadors was similar to that of Naval and Mtlitary Officers. The case of Calliford which had been quoted, had no reference to this case ; for the House did no more than order - hint to attend aria charge of certain misdemeanors ; he at first neglected the order for his attendance, - and the house Merely suspended 'hint from his privileges; but he did at last attend,-then went back to Ire land 0 execute the duties of his dffice of Com missioner of the Revenue, and he was not re moved from his seat. There were persons hold mg judicial offices in Scotland who could not sit in the liotise ; but they were excluded by a special Act of Parliament. The operation of this Address, if carried. would, be more unjust than any ex post facto law that ever was passed, and would, in fact, be an ex p"st facto Address. After the Union in 1801, the House passed an Act to declare the offices, the holders of which were to be excluded from Parliament. The Act enume rated several offices, and never mentioned that of Master ia Chancery. English Masters in Chancery were allowed to, sit in the House ; and coup any thing be more grossly unjust than that of exclud ing a Member because he held the office of a Master in Chancery in Ireland ? It was an incon venience often felt that professional gentlemen in Ireland could not attend in that House. The gentlemen of the bar could not give up . their practice' by coming over here ; and as the people of the Metropolis of Ireland felt that their interests required that an able lawyer from that comitry should he a Member of Parliament, t o d; seass a ll grea t questions t"Oiillf! cted with their legal and commercial rights, thisught fit . to elect the lion. and Learned Gentleman who had. just retired, and who must be subjected to a griev ous injury and injustice if he were removed. Mr. AiitsitcrtOMiiiE contended that it . was im possible for Mr. Ellis - to discharge his duties as a Judge if he attended his duties in that House. It appeared that Mr. Ellis was required to be at his office during the greater part of every day of ten months of the year ; and he asked, was a due attention to . his business as .a Master of Chancery consistent with his duties as a Member of, Par liament. He thonght, that, of all professional men, Judges should be the last that ought to be allowed to have seats in that House. Mr. Beowsraow thought that this was one of the most cruel and gratuitous attempts-at iucli vidual'njustice that ever Was made, and as such he would give it his decided opposition. Lord CasTarataaan said, he should divide the subject into three heads—first, as 'to the general expediency of some regulation respecting the of fice of Master in Chancery in tieland ; secondly, as to the particular case of Mr. Ellis ; and, third ly, as to the situation in which the majority of the House stood, who had voted last year for the Chancery Bill. With regard to 'the last, he had expressed his concurrence in 'the clause for ex chiding the individual from his 'seat, but not 'from his office ; but be had never considered that be was bound to, pass by the. House of Lords after they had rejected it', and to do that by Address which they had refused to 'do by Legislation,— That, indeed, would be to place the House in such an attitude, with respect to the Lords, as no prudent man could desire. He was ready to admit the great incongruity of any Irish judicial officer holding a seat in that House ; and such was his' impression when this case was before under the consideration of that House ; but yet, since that period, he had found that Mr. Ellis's situation formed a special case; for at that pe riod be was not aware that this Gen tleman had hotight his office, paying no less a • surn than 9 or 10,0001.; that at the, time he made this purchase he was not aware that his tenure of .the office would exclude him from a seat ,in .Parliament;. nay, more, that when elected by the citizens of Dublin, he had no reason .to think himself ineli Bible to that seat. Under these circumstances, and - considering that there was less pregnant public necessity for the excluSioia of the Hon, and 1.-arned Gentle Man than he ,had contemplated npan the first view of the subject, he could not accede to the Motion, although he was ready to agree to any measure for excluding Irish judicial officers from that House in future, excepting the particular case of Mr. Ellis.. _Here there was a loud cry for Mr. PLUNKETT, who rose accordingly. The Right Hon. Gentlentan began by Observing that the pre Sent savoured much of a personal motion; and that therefore, from his respect for Mr. Ellis, he, should feel some,difficdlty in speaking epon it, if it asere-notsfor the concluding obser vation of the Laarned:Gentlematebirnself, viz. that. the present question was,mueh impor tant to the rights of his Constituents than to any feeling or interest of. his own.; But tp,, this oh servation he would say, that the ,Learited ,Gen tleman might be deprived of s his seat ,witheut arty loss either to himself •oatcathern : for . if he were a good :Master im chanc,eryalle coeldisot be a good Member of,. Parliament. His 'own .character, locked, as .well„ :as their inte rests, would he best .consulted by vacat ing either. his seat or his place. As to the argument, that Masters in Chancery were -gible to sit in that llonse,..becanSa they were omitted in the Act of 1803, which excltided cer tain Irish oaces, he rhaiotaitted that this argu :tient hid no validity ; for although the Irish jadges Were not enumerated in that ACt, would tiny one infer the monstrous idea that theysould sit in that House ? The At. lion. Gentleman ex- posed-the fallacy of the reasoning; that this •W4l merely a question of privilege ;. and_after describ ing the duties which thetearned Gedt.litmd to per- , form in Ids office ihireland,ccirribitiimi4 the descrip tion 4-itti a statement of his own dechiratiou before •a Committee of that Hotise, that. he "Was•utsaer . the necessity of tittemiding thcise Akita dtitie,s not less than teu hours a da4' for thefar.greatet_part of the year, he cancloded With repeating his re . spectfiir the Learned Genttentan, whose gibility . tosit itr that House, be (Mr. P.) statedl publiClS , 'at the hurt it s in Dublin, bef6re his election—adding that he thotight the House it self flk i y to declare him inc ligible, not becalpie lie was in any respect intompetent to the ditties Of a Legislatory.but .because ,he could not per- , form stich duties in conjunction with those of an Irish Master in Chancery;—beeatise, km 'a *ord, the Learned Gentletrian could riot do ititpos:;ibi lities.—(ilear, hear!) Dr. Losmswrox, in his reply, 'stated, that h took the words which he had imputed to the Noble Secretary of State from' the concurri.nt reportS of all the Journals he could find with respect to what the Noble Lord said when this question was before under the con sideration of that house, those reports too being' cOafirmed - by the testimony of several Members of that House. The NOble Lord - -had, however, thought proper to. deny those words but from this denial and the Noble Lord's-cHnge of .onieion„ he must say, that be should never again allow himself to he wedded to any coni dence in the declared opinion of the Noble Lord, considering the ingenuity with which he could change his opinion, and - the manner in wi.::64 could assert that n;:w lights broke in upoP bins to call for that change. Ile saw s . 110 w -ever, that those new lights broke in also upon several Gentlemen, for they were all babes a grace. MO withstanding the aberration of the Noble Lord and his immediate adherents from their fnrmer profess' d se . ptiMents upon this subject, lie trusted that the House would, in justice and humanity-, accede to his motion, and thus secure to time suitors in the Irish Court of Chancery, that at tention which they had a right to expect. At all events, he was- determined (hosv.over the Noble Lord might desert his native land) to do all the justice in his power towards the - very . in teresting and much injured people of that country. The House divided, and the numbers were— Fiir the Moliton Against it 11' --Gel Dr. LUSHINCTON gave notice of a Motion for Thursday next, for leave to bring i:i a Bill to ex clude persons holding high legal situations front occupying Seats that)louse. Nl - . LiNNARD moved for an Account of the Produce of the Excise Duties on Articles enter ing and consumed in Birmingham, for 1819 and 1820, expressing the articles and quantities.— Ordered . 'Mr; llot.mEs laid the Miscellaneous Estimati on the table.—Ordered to be printed. • CATHOCI - C - C{IrESII - 0. --- THE NAMES OF THE MEMBERS WHO DID . NOT 'VOTE Ott PAIR Orr ON Blrrt- PLUNKETT'S MOTION' ON WEDNES DAY LAST, THE 28TH 1.7 . 1. T. . . -ATQurt, C. A. Fa&stone, Viscount' Paget,' iron. 1:f . Ancrain; Earl Forbes, Viscount ..Paget, Hon. Sir C. Antrobus, G. C. Forester, Francis Pahner, Charles Ashurst, V. 11. . Foster,..R.r. LIOn. J. Parnell, W. Astley, J. I). GippS, a orge • - Parsons, J. Aubrey, • Sir J. Bt. Gooch, Thomas S. Pelham, lion. C. A . Balfour, John Gordon, lion. W. Peunant, G. 11. 1). Baring, H. Graliiin, Jarritni ' Percy, 'Hon. 11: Marne, : Michael GraVe s , L ar d ' 'Percy, lion. W. 11. Barry, 11 t. lin. J. 31. Greenhill, Itussellt. l'lurn.r, W. Barton, Nathaniel Ciros.set, J. R. Pollington, Visi..t. Bastard, E. P. Grosvenor, Thos. Prittic, Hon. F. A. Bastard, John • GUrney, R.' H. Proby, Hn. Grany. Belfast, Earl of • Haldiman,. W. S, E. V. .' Bernal, Ralph Hare, Hon. R. Ramsbottom, johu, Bernard, J. jun. Ileathcote, SirGilb. , jun. • • ' '-. Blake, Robert • - Ba-t. • • Ricardo; D. ... • Boswell, Alex. Heron, Sir It. Robarts, 1.1. J. :. lloughey„ Sir J.. Pt. Holmes, Sir L. T. Roberts, W. 'A. " Boughton, IV. E. R. W. Bart: ' -' • •Itothford, tiust.:H. Broughain, H. Hope, Hon. Sir A. Rooksavage,-Earl•af Bruen, Henry Hope, Sir W. G. Rose, Mllap...G. H. Burdrtt, Sir F. Bt. Horrocks, Samuel Russell, Mat. '2- Burgh, Sir U. B. - Howard itlolyneux Sandori,.Viscxy.int But zerworth, Jos. Howard, Li H.T. SLourfield, W.-:4:. • • Buxton, J. F. Hudson, Har. Sheldo n , Italp4 , .. ~ Caleraft, J. 11. Hulse, Sir C. Shelby, Sir J..1.344rt. Campbell, Lord J. liyde, John Shitilier, Sir - 6 , ...-iii. D. H. James, William ,Sibthorp, C. W. . Campbell-lin.G. P. Inner, John Smith, sl,l Canning, Rt. fln.G. Jocelyn, Han. J. ' Smith, rrOa. Ea: Carhampton,•Earl Kerr, David • Sothercn, 1.; - Carrot, John • - King, Sir J. D. At Spurrics,..C. Chaloner, It. Langston, J. H. '• - Stewart,frft.J.ll.F. - . Cliamberlayne, W. I AseelleS, Vise •••ati t •8 te WI- r •.,• W. Ghetwynde.; George Leake, NV. ' • Stratt, J.' H. Cockburn, -Sir U. Lindsay, Lord . S:..it.t.m, Right :nun. Cocks, Ilon. J. S. Littleton, 11 J. C.. M. Coke, .1.. W. jun. Lockha a rt, t. A H V on .'E . . t . ). Te h, ra m ti p e ,o , i E l : : il vv.. . .:. Townshend,. ,li on - , Co A lq . uhoun, Rain. Lo Lo r n a g , , no, Lora .Cooper, E. S. Macdonald; R. G. H. G. P. 1 Cotes, John .Macketki??; • 'V. - Townshend, : Lord Cuffe, James ' Macqueen, T. P. J. NIB.' . . Cunningham-I'Bi, Madacks, W. A. Trench, F. W. Sir W, Bart. IViatjorilraziks, S'l.rJ. 'Padway, Jotio P. Davies, T. IL : -.Bart. • Tyra.; C. K. • Dawson, (4. R. ' Markham, J. lixbriage, En-1 c..i' Domville, SirC. Illarryatt, J. Vaughan, Sir R. W.: •Drummond, 4. . „ Maxwell, J. ' ..• Bart. ' Dunally, Lord Milbank, 'Mark ' Vereker; llon. J.P. DuticOirb, C. Mont ornery, Sir J. Villicrs;Right Her:. DuncoMb; W. - Bart. Militias, Itt.lin.W. Mordaunt, Six C. Walpole, Lo r d EdnionStane,. Sir C. Bart. War.n C. Bart. NCule, Sir H.P. At Welleidey; R.: • .- •Edwards,lizi.E. 11. - .Needham, lion: F. Wigravri, , Sir•ft. Elford John 'Nolay. ) 'Michael - Wilber/at-to' 'W. Ellis; ii,,,iy - • - 'North,- a' . : Willi.„--„, e tw o n : FerraisToWnshend, -O'Brien, ..St v . ;E: -Pt. .Wi11i w , , ,,,, sir it Lord C. 'O'Caflagban, J. Williams, lie , ' ::-- Fife.„ Earl of tl•'Gratlys,• .!;.i. ' Witlouz . "iby, F 1 FirazepAßt.lTOn.• t)'llarrt,• Charles Wiii.._;ritca, .S. 'i". • my . . • • ' • OsbO4he; 14 F. G. W001..1 1 ., • Fitz-Harris, Vistt. - (lfS',llStail; Lots-1 Wrow sl7, 11. Foley,ThOibas - 'OOO4, :lit-..1. ii: • 'ioilic; 4..tir J. S. sir ilr.,,%.)Amis Liki3Opoi l eittr) arrived in tpw.a Yestg.:rtl.ay, morning 116 1 4-h ton , 4rl upon. the I)Ulke and.FSOchei,s of..I;LAitI4C.F. condolence from the p r i-,,, ess Au _ • 041 • OUS'T.A , oc , from, 1.9 4- more, and remained v‘ith:tstte . and-'l)uclicc till pastit,ve, when herl - Roial , Ttighiyess returned. to .Fro,Akilfire, Thc PU.ctivss of t ;1,61.4•1c::-rzit ;,C L 1 the Princess SoentA .were Wan the Dike anti Duches, treat i;oitiOu rjuccies. of 4sf:iv:e,4l froth Ciarcjilont one, and renvined .611 past three, when 't e r Ito,' Ifighnesl returned to ,C1 . 4 . •r . oms:lnt,.‘Whk , 'she c.' , "•- tinues on a visit to Ilyince LEO poi.e. PrincesgSgenti MATIT.o . Scot rival Lilacl , Cheav-, niale Ger. affeetionate. intiniries of toliil,6leo'• The Tesidence of.the bufce ai i:l 4 11 •t :e Palace, St, Ja•ioes's,,wtts throfiged'au.r . ing the )6 hole of yesterday witfi inq 'cOuities of ,u -dolence. . .•