The Sun. — London, England, 1839-05-28 00:00:00

sisted rith a by of )ur of e may re ,asure. )n, of e, In mar- EVENING EDITION. A T a MEETING held at KENNINGTON COMMON this Evening, ( It , _ Captain ACK ERLEY in the Chair, was proposed by Mr. La BLOND, and seconded by Mr. GRANBY, and carried, That the true object of this out-door meeting is on behalf of liberty for the dear children in slavery, through the agency of the nlis-called " Children's Friend Society" and those children of a larger growth in prison at home ; to equalize the laws in their regard, like as unto the scales of justice offered by nature for tnan's guidance, to preserve what is good in the law, and dis card what is evil ; to support, to maintain that elective form of Government, for the cultivation and allotment of the land, in a way most conducive to the public voice ; for filling the belly, to the comfort of the cottager, and to the public well-being of the people individually as one, and collectively as the many, without regard to religious creed or colour. It was proposed by Mr. GEoacr, and seconded by Mr. PETE; and carried, That in the present crisis of National distress, where all the monied-wealth of the upper and middle classes are in direct opposition—in sworn combination against the native rights of the industrious, their suffering fellow-countrymen, this assembled host, with up-lifted hands, in the face of God. from this moment constitutes itself into a " National Union," with like intentions as their relatives in Birmingham, to support the National Convention, as long as honesty marks their ac tions, to insist on the complete restoration of the old national liberty of vote in y.e people—a return to their parents of the Poor kidnapped children, under false-articled indentures, now beyond the seas ' • also to demand— once f or all--of the Queen, whether she and her pensioned relatives are for the Charter or against it ; because if not with us, the people, they are against us. Signed this day. 27th May, 1839, on behalf of the meeting, CHARLES H. ACKERLY. The National Union of the Working Classes adjourned to Monday next, the 3d of June, 1839, with the understanding that the aforesaid resolutions be transmitted to the Secretary of State for the Home Department. C. H. A. IFS Majesty the EMPEROR of RUSSIA , hawing AUTHORISED and GUARANTEED several DISTRIBUTIONS of MONEY, which (though they are NO LOTTERIES), offer many possibilities of obtaining LARGE FORTUNES, HEINE BR THERS at HAM, are NOW SELLINGO SHARES for any B o URG f the H said DIS TRIBUTIONS of MONEY. Persons desirous to purchase alai receive, PREVIOUS to giving any order, the PROS PECTUS and PARTICULARS, upon addressing, WITH OUT DELAY, a line to HEINE BROTHERS at HAAIBURGH. P. S. The next Distribution contains portions •f 3,5001., 7,0001., and 24,0004 The distributing day being VERY NEAR, NO TIME IS To RE LOST for those desirous to became shareholders for THIS NEXT DISTRIBUTION. THEATRE ROYAL, COVENT GARDEN. The Public is respectfully informed, that the PRESENT MANAGEMENT WILL TERMINATE WITH THIS SEASON ; The following Programme is therefore gives of its final ar rangements : The Historical Play of KING HENRY V., from the Text Shakspeare, will be produced early in June. RICHELIEU. will be repeated on Friday next. THE TEMPEST will be performed To-morrow. THE LADY OF LYONS, on Thursday next. THIS EVENING, Moir 28. FOR THE BENEFIT OF MISS RAINFORTH. Will be presented the Comedy of AS YOU LIKE IT Orlando, Mr. Anderson; Jacques, Mr.lrandanhoff ; Adam, Ikle. warde ; Touchstone, Mr. Harley ; Rosalind, Miss Helen Fiucit ; Celia, Miss Rainforth. After which, A MUSICAL MELANGE. To conclude with THE SLAVE. To-Morrow, The Tompest, with The Marriage of Figaro. ROYAL SURREY THEATRE. "."sr Romer, Mr. Templeton, and Mr. Balfe, in Donizetti a L'Elisir d'Amore," to be produced for the first time en the English Stage, and entitled " The Love Spell." Unparal leled success of " Alice Gray"— Nightly overflows. THIS EVENING, MAY 28, (Eighth time) a Domestic Drama, called ALICE GRAY, THE SUSPECTED ONE. After which, DON PEDRO, THE CRUEL. To conclude with, MY POLL AND MY HARTNER JOE. of T e-Morrow will positively be produced, Donisetti's Opera Thl_Love WHITE CONDUIT GARDENS, (Open Every Evening) THIS EVENING, MA: 28, A GRAND PROMENADE CONCERT, By a Band of Fifty First-rate Performers. The unrivalled Performances of the celebrated Arab, AB SHEKIR ABDALLAH. V ocalists—Miss Ford, (from the Theatre Royal Drury Lane), Messrs. Benson and Manelark. Splendid Fireworks. 'fie Ascent and Descent of Madame Rossini, surrounded v rha by showers of Fire. W ardens brilliantly illuminated by upwards of 20,000 Lamps, in various devices, &c. &c. Full Particulars in the Bills of the Day. LONDON : TUESDAY, MAY 28, 1830. i ` Q e he itsuntide two Houses o id f Parliament met last night a ft e r Wh holays. I n the Lords a very considerable number of petitions roernr7 pre sented in favour of Mr. limes plan of a Pennyuni- Postage. Lord BROUGH AM asked when any measure concern. in g Canada was likely to be brought forward. Lord MELEOURNE said that such a measure was tinder consideration, but it was of great importance and equired much time. Lord BROUGHAM also asked whether the Govern. P RINCE, had yet taken any steps re l a ti ve to C o l one , who had disgraced the name of a British officer d Y ordering four prisoners taken in Canada to be shot. T he Noble and Learned L or d most i n di gnant l y an d I c)Fluently stigmatized the conduct of Colonel PRINCE, , / ',hleh he said, and pledged himself as a l a wy e r fo r assertion, was wicked murder. The Marquis of NORMANBY could only say that the ' l : o vertime:tit had signified its disapprobation of Colonel 'uNcr's conduct. Lord BitouGHAm thought that disapprobation was rl 't enough ; murder required to be severely punished. The Marquis of NORMANBY was understood to suggest doubt w h e th er th e c o n d uc t o f C o l one l P RINCE was and to profess a readiness to lay all the papers °°tlcerning the business before their Lordships. Tite Earl of \VINCIIILSEA, on being informed by 'lcount MELBOURNE that he meant to make no ge r°ral statement of the principles on which he is Fconduct the Government, gave notice that on ri day he will endeavour to elicit some informa l) presume,' hy ma kin, some remarks. The Noble Earl, we f means to taunt the Ministers, after the Of the Tory press, and will be,heard, we have no ' 414 13t, by them with silent contempt. Lord 'BROUGHAM in askinz a question concerning the present salary of Sir JOHN 111`NEILL, lat e ly E nvo y t o P ersia, complained of the carelessness of the House °f Commons 's to our expenditure, and said happily, tt ld with an allusion to Mr. HUME, who w as b e l ow th e b ar of the House, " a generation had grown up which th ew not Joseph." Lord MELBOURNE was not able t° infor m Lord BROUGHAM whether Sir J. APNEILL now t ::eeiv es hi s sa l ar y o r not. Lord ELLzsa ot iou cw sa id If he did, it was from the E ist India Comp a ny, °°t by a vote of the House of Commons. Their Lord adjourned soon after six o'clock. Th e C omm ons met at the early hour of three, and ,'"e House, with every part of the gallery, was very 'clri completely crowded. At a quarter before four, Lord JOHN RUSSELL an tl°llneed her MAJESTY'S pleasure—Mr. AantcnomaY L aving resigned—that the Commons should choose an °ther Speaker. Such a permission to elect an Officer, : I llose presence is necessary to the functions of the ,leanest assembly, is indicative of the state of vassalage :"` the Commons in the good old times. The custom now kept up, we presume, as a memorial of what was " r 'd in order to remind the sometimes proud Commons 51 th e huinl , leness of their origin. Mr, HANDLEY proposed Mr. SHAW LEFEVRE as a L 3 per person to fill the Chair. Sir STE PHEN tSHINGTON seconded the proposition. Both Gentle 'ell justly and deservedly eulogised Mr. SHAW LEFEVRE. Mr. WyNNE, in a similar strain of eulogy, but applied a .° Mr. GOULBURN, nominated that gentleman, and was : e 'onded by Mr. WILSON PATTEN. Mr. WYNNE l Pded t o the ribald attacks which had been made on fGouesceN, which had excited, he said, his disgust ; ; 1 , 11(1 Mr. WILSON PATTEN, in his speech, confounded lion, and Learned Member for Dublin with his Hon. Friend whose nomination to the Chair was supporting. If any thing can flatter Mr. 4p eONNELL it must be the perpetual allusion to his sayings and doings, showing that he fills the ' i tlds of all his contemporaries in an unexampled man hit• He is the " observed of all observers." When the two gentlemen had been put in nomination, W. DUNCOMBE rose for the purpose apparently of t P °vingthat it wasat his suggestion the Post and Standard I.l%inmended the Radicals to nominate Mr. BERNAL. ;" rep r oached them in the House for not doing so, w ' r 'd eulogized Mr. BERNAL in such a lofty strain, that w! .ean only wonder at the elasticity of his conscience, t Veil allowed him afterwards t o vote for the inferior k l. • GOC L BURN. After suitable expressions of gratitude, det prof ess i o ns of a determination to do their duty a n d th iropartially, on the part of the respective candidates, House divided, when Mr. SHAW LETEVRE was betted by a majority of 18, in a House of 620 Mem fells, including the tellers ; 317 voted far him, and 299 t , ° '' Mr, GoueliuttN. That is a measure of the rn i. he °© with which Sir IrtansEter PEEL would 1 4 vo undertaken to carry on the Government, and which Was to form into a majority by the help of a few tr°urt Ladies. He had a lucky escape from more discs °Tull deEats than he before encountered. 4' 4 answer to a question from Sir R. PEEL, Lord Qt RN R.CREELL announced his intention of stating to 4-crow that he would postpone the Education Grant for th:rtnight, at which the Tories, as if imbued with sPtri t of the Priesthood, gave some mo,t vociferous • ,' 'O4 vrhie altn. taxers. Does Sir ROBERT PEEL—do the Tories mean to oppose this grant—and do they mean to patronise ignorance that they may continue oppression ? We believe they do, because Sir ROBERT himself is as completely Priest-ridden as any habitual frequenter of the confessional, who finds relief and consolation from the forgiveness of Father SLATTERY, or any other Catholic priest. The House did no other business. To-morrow Mr. SHAW LEFEVRE will be presented at the bar of the House of Lords to receive her MAJESTY'S approbation. Mr. SHAW LEFEVRE was yesterday elected Speaker by such a majority as must convince every one that the Government can undertake nothing decisive in the way of legislation. Any measure it might propose, which should offend half a dozen of its followers, would again de stroy it. We did not, indeed, look for any accession of strength to have accrued during the holidays, nor do we know where it is now to be immediately collected. It is only by operating on the opinions of the public, by accumulating and con centrating the public demands on someone point, that we can now hope to procure any further legislative improvement. We must defeat the Tories in the coun try before we can conquer them in Parliament, and to accomplish this object, the Liberal Ministry, the Liberal Members of the House of Commons, and the Liberal Press, must now direct its efforts. Nothing, we repeat, can be done for Reform in a House of Commons of which upwards of 300 are Tories. A system of active and malignant hostility, sus tained by unscrupulous falsehood, is levelled by all he engines of the Tory party against the attempt, imited and inadequate as it is, to initiate a system of National Education in these countries. Because the plan, in order to be universal, liberates the children of Dissenters from the necessity of re ceiving lessons in a faith they disavow, from pastors whose authority they disclaim, and supplies them with the means of instruction according to the religious tenets they conscientiously acknowledge, from pastors whose authority they respect, the plan is stigmatized as irreligious, and the nor mal school, proposed to be established for the due instruction of teachers, is declared to be a " nest of free-thinkers." This was to be expected. Short-sighted, indeed, must he be who, looking at the Tory faction, could have hoped that any plan of ge neral education which would not violate the consciences of Dissenters, could ever be made acceptable to such a party. Exclusive alike in politics and religion—fearful of the advance of knowledge, as thieves dread the approach of day—maintaining its power by repress ing public intelligence—coercing public opinion by closing the avenues of instruction, through which nations are enlightened and taught to value the blessing of freedom, it is inherent in the nature of such a party to oppose a desperate resistance to any plan having the objects which are avowed in the project now proposed. The contrast between Great Britain and other nations of Europe, with less pretension to an ad vanced state of civilization, has become too humili ating, and the general cry for a system of National Education has consequently become too loud and imperious to be safely resisted by those to whom, secretly, such a measure is repugnant. Consequently there is no party who will now venture openly to oppose a general proposition for national instruc tion. But what they dare not openly and avowedly resist, they artfully endeavour to thwart and render abortive, by combining with it conditions which they well know it will be impossible to ful fil. The condition on which they propose that the child of the Dissenter shall be educated at the national expense is, that that child shall at the same time he instructed in a creed which its parents disavow ; that it shall read a version of the Scriptures which its parents disclaim ; and that it shall be instructed by ministers, whose authority its parents deny, in doctrines which its parents abhor. The price to be exacted for educa tion is, therefore, apostacy. It is obvious that a grant for National Education, subject to such a condition, would be practically a grant for the education of the communicants of the Church of England only. Unless the principle of religious intolerance be admitted, unless the right of private judgment, so prominently sustained and established at the Reformation be abrogated, it is impossible to defend the proposition that that portion of the national revenues, to be applied by Parliament to the instruction of the people, shall be strictly limited to the instruction of those who will consent to accept the doctrines of the Church of England. The Dissenters and the Ro man Catholics contribute to the national revenue by payment of taxes equally with the members of the Established Church ; they equally contribute to the support of the Establishment itself by the payment of tithes ; they equally supply our army and navy ; and are equally called on to discharge all the duties of citizenship—in juries, in municipal affairs, in the militia, in electoral constituencies. They are part and parcel of the people at large, and entitled to the consideration of the Legislature in a degree and to an extent proportionate to their numerical weight, by their contributions to wealth, by their stake in the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests, and by their industry and intelligence. Is it, then, consistent with any ge neral principles of equity, or with the spirit of our Liberal Constitution, that so large a sec tion of the people should be held responsi ble for the fulfilment of the duties and obliga tions of citizens, and yet be excluded from the benefits of legislation on one of the most vitally im portant subjects within the province of legislation ? Is it compatible even with the most vulgar notions of justice that money should be exacted from Wes leyans and Catholics, from Unitarians, Socinians and Jews, indiscriminately, to be expended for the special advantage of the education of the members of the Established Church, under the fraudulen title of a national grant as a means for advancing the general improvement and civilization of the people ? It is at present proposed to make a grant of public money for the construction of Railways through Ireland. What would be thought of him who would propose as the condition of such a grant that none but members of the Established Church should be permitted to travel upon such Railways, or enjoy the advantage of intercommunication which they would afford ? And if this be admitted to be a monstrous and ridiculous stretch of despotism in reference to a Railway, how much more monstrous and more indefensible must a similar condition be in reference to the moral and intellectual improve ment of the people ? In short, what is wanted, and what cannot long he withheld, is some adequate and efficient means of universal instruction, available for the whole po pulation of this great nation, proportionate to the position among civilized countries which England has assumed—that amount of knowledge which is the right of a free people, that amount of in struction which is necessary for the wholesome exercise of those political rights which such a people enjoy, and that instruction must be sup plied and administered in a manner compatible with perfect freedom of conscience in religion. The fanatical party in the Church of Scotland are now .beginning to feel the effects of their rash and stupid interference with the civil power. They are compelled, by the recent decision of the A uch terarder case in the House of Lords, to retrace their steps, and this they are loath, very loath to d o . Dr. COOK, a man of learning, and possessi ng that which is far bett er t h an learning, a great store of good sense, propo se d t h at t h e Church, having been defeated in her late ungrateful attack upon her creator, the State, should retire at once to the safe position which she occupied befor e the commence ment of hostilities. This was sound advice, but it was too humiliatin g to the pride of the sticklers for the independence (!) of ecclesiastical jurisdiction. The men who had boasted that the General Assembly of the Cl.urch of Scotland was amenable for its acts to no earthly tribunal, had no head but JESUS CHRIST, and, in dealing with the interests of p a t rons , pa rishioners, and licentiates, might do just what it liked with its own—the men who had put forth and acted upon these high pretensions, found an inexpressible awkwardness in acknowledging that they had been all the while labouring. under a delusion of their own imagination, which had vanished before the decision of the House of Lords. It was a practical exemplification of the bathos, painful beyond mea sure to thos e asp i r i ng sp i r i ts to whom " descent an d fall is adverse." Yet how to escape from the dilem ma in which their headstrong folly had placed them, without appearin g , on the one hand, to set the now I THE SUN. LONDON. TUESDAY, MAY 28, 1839. declared law of the land at open defiance, or on the other to confess that they had been guilty of an unprovoked and arrogant invasion of the righ:3 of the State, was not a problem of easy solution. Solved, however, it must be, and accordingly forth steps a great magician, Dr. CHALMERS, the prime mover of all the mischief, and proposes a new plan for reconciling contradicl ions, which his followers, who, unhappily for the Kirk, constituted in this case a majority of the Assembly, eagerly adopted. Had he prescribed to each of them a double dose of MORISON'S pills, we have no doubt it would have been taken with as little hesitation and with infi nitely less detriment either to the constitution of the patients or to that of the Church of Scotland. This nostrum, which the Reverend Doctor wrapped up in the form of a resolution, was compounded after the following original fashion : The first paragraph of the resolution pretends to acquiesce in the deci sion of the House of Lords, asserting that it has ever been the practice of the Church to give and inculcate implicit obedience (!) to the decisions of Civil Courts in regard to civil rights ; while in the second paragraph it flies directly in the face of this doctrine declares that the General Assembly " cannot abandon the principle" for which it has been contending in this very case, the decision of which has, on its own showing, settled the question—insists that this principle is, and always has been, part and parcel of the law of the Church ; and states, lastly, that the Assembly is determined to enforce it ! ! So much for the implicit obedi ence to Civil Courts, which Dr. CHALMERS and his clique are in the habit of "giving and incul cating." No doubt the General Assembly can enforce this or any other principle which it chooses to adopt, but it will then be pleased not to denomi nate itself the Assembly of the Church of Scot land. It must cut all connection with the State, if it will not hold to the terms on which that connection was entered into, and on which alone it can be maintained. It must forego all in the shape of temporal advan tage which it derives from the State, if it ousts the State from the copartnery concern, and must devote itself entirely to dealing in spiritual matters. It will then be a true Christian Church, of a purely voluntary character and strictly apostolical consti tution. If this be what Dr. CHALMERS is driving at, we think he should say so at once, and then the question might be fairly brought to an issue. For our own part, we are afraid that the people of Scotland are not yet prepared to take so great a stride as this champion of Church independence, with his seven-league-boots, seems to be meditating, and that if it were honestly and broadly put to them whether they would have the Ecclesiastical Constitution, as it existed up to 1834, when the Veto Act was passed, with its patronage, its sti pends, its kirks, manses, glebes, &c., or Dr. CHAL MERS' " principle," denuded of these incum brances, we are strongly inclined to think there would be a goodly majority against the Doctor and his naked principle. Of this leaning to creature comforts, this hank ering after the flesh-pots of Egypt, in the carnal minds of his countrymen, if not in his own, Dr. CHALMERS betrays his consciousness, and, there fore, in the third paragraph of his resolution he tries hard to prevent the divorce of things :temporal from things spiritual, which is the natural result of the " independent" principle. He proposes that, to avert the evil consequences that are likely to flow from this separation, a Committee be appointed to consider how the conflicting claims of the Church and the State may be best adjusted, and to correspond with the Government on the sub ject. This surpasses in assurance and stolidity any proposition that has ever come under our consideration. In that very resolution, in which this meek apostle of obedience hurls defiance at the decision of the Supreme Judicatory of the land, and actually threatens to persist in the course which has been by it declared illegal, he has the face to ask the Government to give its sanction to his rebellious conduct, to countenance and encou rage disobedience of the laws I Truly Dr. CHAL MERS is a consistent as well as a modest man ! The General Assembly has now to consider what effect its proceedings are likely to produce on the people of Scotland, and on the country at large. Having adopted Dr. CHALMERS' " principle,' it remains to he seen whether, by so doing, it has raised itself in public estimation, or strengthened the foundations of the Church. We believe it has done neither—but the contrary of both. Sober minded people will hesitate to remain connected with a Church whose ministers set an example of despis ing the laws, and Dissent will reap the benefit ; while the extravagant pretensions of these highflyers, and their still more extravagant perseverance in them, after they have been proved to be inconsistent with the civil constitution of the country, must disgust all men, and most of all those to whom the zealots of the Kirk have hitherto looked up for support. Dr. CHALMERS and his friends are endeavouring to effect impossibilities. They would fain take the sweets and leave the bitters of their cup of Church and•State connection. But this may not be in the state matrimonial. In another article we have referred to the means which are adopted to bring discredit on the Minis terial proposition to commence an improvement in the education of the people. In the present article it is our intention to refer to the claims now made in the name of the Clergy for them exclusively to controul the education of the people. The Rev. B. H. KENNEDY, in his letter to the inhabitants of Shrewsbury, makes it a reproach to the Ministers that " they did not confer with the Prelates of our Church," not " with the heads or professors of our Universities," not " with any of those in whom an honest Churchman can place confidence." One of the special accusations of the Tory papers, too, is that the " Ministers did not consult the Bench of Bishops." The Clergy and their partizans require that nothing shall be done towards establishing a system of education without consulting them. We ask the public to inquire what there is in the position or conduct of the Clergy, which should make it incumbent on the State to ask their advice in preference to that of all other men on this very important subject ? We have first to remark that the Clergy are the only class of the community who are represented in the Upper House of Parliament. The Bishops are the authorised organs of the Priesthood, and can give their advice openly in the House of Peers. The Priests concur in common with other free holders or residents in towns, in electing Members to the House of Commons, and if they cannot sit there themselves, they have, in addition to the Bishops in the Upper House, the four representa tives of the two Universities, who are almost exclu sively their organs. lnevery parish theyhave had, and yet have, from the tithe -system, prodigious power over the bulk of the agriculturists, which enables them to exercise a very great influence over the composi tion of the House of Commons. All these legiti mate means of controling the Legislature, and checking the progress of any measure which they dislike, does not satisfy the Priesthood ; and this excessively greedy and ambitious class of men ac tually make it a fault or a crime in the Ministers, that they have not, before proposing any measure concerning education to Parliament, taken the opi nion of the Prelates and the Professors of the Universities. What would they have ? We an swer—the unlimited command of our persons and properties. There is, however, an excellent reason why they should not be exclusively consulted. They are jects of suspicion and mistrust to all but Church men ; and to consult them exclusively implies an outrage to the great body of the Dissenters. If the Ministers had proposed an alteration in the bibs or surplices of the Clergy, or in the mode of chaunt ing the Cathedral service, if they had suggested the exclusion from the Liturgy of the Athanasian Creed, or a due curtailment of that Popish mass which bears the name of the Litany, and had not first consulted all the Archbishops, Bishops, and Rectors, the great body of the Clergy would have had just reason to complain. But what right have they to assume a control over the educa tion of any children but their own ? If the State wished to make the education, which it deems necessary, distasteful to all Dis senters, and to all the persons who dislike the meddling of the Priesthood—now not a few—it could adopt no more effectual means than to consult the Prelates and make its plans subservient to their selfish purposes. And what right have they from character to make such a demand ? Have they educated the people ? Have they carefully studied the means of instructing and improving mankind ? Are they the possessors of some exclusive secret for drilling the mind into virtue—for mak ing it drink in knowledge as the fertile earth drinks in rain, and send it forth in nourish ing fruits and beautiful flowers, and for making the mind take, like the newly invented photogenic paper, no impression s but those of loveliness, such as the artist desires ? Their pretensions, we know, are enormous, but experience proves that they have pro duced no beneficial effects. Since the days of TYN DAL and BOLINGUROICE, the Priesthood of England have had unbounded sway, except as curbed by the press, over the public mind. Every approach to inde pendence of thought, every attempt to overthrow their exclusive dominion, has, by public opinion or by the force of law, and very often with the commission of barbarous injustice, been successfully put down, and for nearly a century they have been the undis puted lords of the people. What in that time have they done to improve them ? When they got PAINE exiled, did they begin to instruct their own flocks ? Not they. They grossly neglected all the means of education, except where they drove it as a trade, as at Oxford and Cambridge, and Har row, and Eton, and made money by it ; and they resisted the attempts by other men to improve the people till they found they could not stop educa tion, and then they seized it to divert it to their own aggrandizement. if LANCASTER and his support ers had not compelkd the Clergy to move, they would most likely at this day have been slumbering on in the full enjoyments of their revenues, without ever thinking of the condition of the people, as they were till about 1812. The shameful manner in which they, with unbounded power and un told revenues at their disposal, neglected to in struct the people placed in their charge, gives them, of all the men in the empire, the least right to be consulted on any new plans of education Since these gentlemen by their excessive arro gance, challenge examination, we shall endeavour, on future opportunities, to do them justice, and we hope the Liberal press throughout the country, will think it only performs a most necessary public duty in engaging in the same course of proceeding. There is abundant evidence to be obtained, and some we have ourselves already published, of the much greater amount of instruction supplied by Voluntary Dissent than by the endowed Priesthood. There is abundant proof to be gathered from expe rience that the secret for improving mankind, of which the Priests claim the possession, is really worth nothing. In their hands it has produced no benefit ; and now that they demand a veto on all political reforms which do not square with their interests, and promote their worldly power, we shall think it a solemn duty to show by their lives and doctrines, that they are wholly unfit to be entrusted with the national education. A most im portant principle is invoked in the resistance they have volunteered to the nascent plan for improving education, and it will provoke, we trust, an equally important discussion. They have set every engine at work to impede and overthrow the Ministers because they are friendly to liberal education, and the time is now come when the nation must decide whether the bulk of the laymen or the Priesthood are to be the real governors of the empire. A general belief prevails at Paris, that it is the in .ention of LOUIS PHILIPPE to take adv an t age o f ;he l a t e disturbance, aml impose still more strict laws on the press, one of the most important of which, is, that the debates in the Chambers shall be given only by official reporters, in other words, by paid agents of the Government. This of course can be be done only with the consent of the Ministry, of PASSY, DUPAURE, LAMARTINI, and others of the liberal school, who have been brought into notice by their Parliamentary talents. Should they consent to such a measure for repressing pub lic opinion, and aid the KING in destroying, no: only the liberty of the press, but the character and freedom of the Chamber of Deputies, in what would the policy of Lours PiimirrE differ from that of CHARLES X. ? Next to destroying the Charter, would be the suppression or mutilation of the Parliamentary debates. The public would place no confidence in the reports—they would place no confidence in the proceedings of their re presentatives, and the consummation ofsuch a project would in all probability be the signal for the gene ral outbreak of those Secret Societies, which, accord ing to universal testimony, prevail in every part of France. Possibly the Cabinet, with the KING still virtually at its head, may consider they have only a choice of evils, and that the safer course would be to make a disguised attack on the Constitution, under the pretence of checking the licentiousness of the press, before this powerful guardian of public liberty ha fanned these Societies into an open flame. One thing, however, is certain, that since 1830, France has never been in such a critical state as at the present moment. The electors returned a majority in opposition to the general policy of the SOVEREIGN ; by delay, manceuvring, and finally, by an insurrection, which even the peaceable citizens regarded rather with favour than hostility, the great ob ject of the people has been defeated; and they arc now threatened with new coercive laws, to prevent them in future from again thwarting the will of the SOVE REIGN. Will they submit ? Will the National Guards, who call out for an extension of the suffrage, join with the Government in rendering even the ex isting representative system a nullity ? This is a fearful question for the peace of France, and we leave LOUIS PHILIPPE anti SOULT to answer i Letters from Alexandria of the Bth inst., whil e ad nutting the extreme probability of a war between the SULTAN and Viceroy of EGYPT, do not confirm the ac counts received on Saturday evening in London, of hos tilities having actually commenced. According to the Egyptian correspondents of the Journal des Debats and the National, both of the Bth, from Alexandria, the SULTAN, acting under the secret instructions of Russia, had commanded HAFIZ I'ACHA to penetrate into Syria, but to avoid, by all means, the first act of aggression which his Highness supposed to be consisting in firing the first cannon shot. The VicEitoY was not less wary in avoiding the imputation of being the aggressor ; and that the European powers might be fully sensible of the extent of his forbearance, he caused the follow ing official letter, dated the 29th of April, to be ad dressed by ARTUR BEY, First Secretary and Interpre ter to his Excellency 13.suos Bay, to the Consuls- General resident at Cairo and Alexandria : " His Higkness the Generalissimo has just informed me, by a private letter, that the forces of the Sultan have ad vanced beyond Bilegik (formerly called Byr), and erected there some fortifications. The Generalissimo, after order- ing the regiments quartered in Syria to march towards Aleppo, was preparing to proceed in person to that city. " His Royal Highness the Viceroy, considering that this conduct of the Porte must have had for its object to make the blame fall upon us, has written to the Generalissimo to make no movement until he shall be certain of the ad vance of the troops of the Sultan, and to confide in God and act in confidence, if he obtained positive information of the advance of those troops. " His Highness the Viceroy instructs me to communi. cate immediately to the Consuls-General what 1 have the honour to transmit to you." On the 28th ult. Beyrout was without a single sol dier, the garrison having been ordered to join the army of IBRAHIM PACHA, Generalissimo of the Egyptian army. On the sth inst., great excitement prevailed in Alexandria, in consequence of the arrival of a Russian Courier from St. Petersburg charged with important dispatches from his Government to the Russian C onsul, into w h ose h an ds only would he deliver the m . T he Consul immediately waited upon the VicElan, b ut of what t oo k pl a ce during the interview nothing trans pired. The following extracts from the communications reeeived this morning supply what important details have reached us : " On board the Leonidas, Roads of Syra, May 10. " The Pacha has proceeded from Caira to Danuena, and there received the Couriers from Syria, without suffering their contents to become known. The corps forming the left of th e T ur kish army are in the mountains. The right wing is in advance towards Bagdad, seeking to effect a junction with the force of the Pacha of that city.' NUMERICAL STRENGTH OF THE TURKISH AND EGYPTIAN FORCES. " Persons the best informed represent the respective knees of the two parties to be the following : —The Turkish army, between 45,000 and 50,000 strong, and well pro vided with artillery, is believed to have left th e mountains of T aurus, w i th a v i ew to a ttack Syria in the r ear, where it expe c t s t h at i ts presence will occasion a general rising. It is divided into three corps, one of which, that to the right (15,000) men, is manceuvring on the left bank of the Euphrates, and going to meet reinforcements, which the Pasha of Bagdad is bringing to the army ; the second corps (20,000 men) crossed the Euphrates at Byr, wh ere it has th rown up some i ntrenc hments ; the third (15 ,000 men) is to guar d t h e passes through the mountain s , i n order to k eep open the comm unications, and secure the arrival of convoys f rom C ons tantinople. This army has neither m agaz i nes , stores, nor provisions, and is as b adly trained as it is undisciplined. " I hav e b een a bl e to o b ta i n more certain - infor mat i on re specting t h e f orces o f t h e Vi ce roy. He has now under arms in his extensive dominions 200,000 soldiers, 100,000 of whom are in Syria. " This Syrian army is composed as follows :_lnfantry__ three re g i m ents of the Guards, 9,600 men; a regiment of Artillery, 3.200; fourteen regiments of the line, 44,600 • three re g i ments more on t h e i r way to Syria, 9,600 ; irre gular Infantry, 4,000; in all, 71,200 men. " Cavalry —Three regiments of the Guard, 2,560 men ; two regiments of Artillery, 1,700; nine regiments of the line, 7,630; irregulars, 16,000; in all, 27,900 men. " General total 99,100 men. " These troops are badly equipped and unpaid, but they have extensive magazines. In point of instruction, disci, pline, and organization, they arc infinitely superior to the Turks; moreover, they possess a certain moral force, for which they are indebted to their last victories over the Turks. Ibrahim Pasha has with him about 30,000 men in the camp of maceuvres be teas established near Aleppo, and the remainder of his regiments are employed in different parts of the country, where an alarming spirit of insurrec tion prevails. It is thought, however, that unless Ibrahim experience a signal defeat, no serious rising will take place in Syria." The bad faith manifested by the SULTAN, who had pledged himself to Admiral ROUSSIN and Lord PON SONRY that he would adopt the pacific policy recom mended by their respective Courts, has roused the ire of the French Press. It is certainly not a little re markable that only five days before the date of the VICEROY'S circular the British and French Consuls had received such communications from their Governments as warranted them in publicly notifying to MEHEMET Au that the SULTAN'S operations would be purely defensive. But it would seem that there is in deed only a Municipal Government at Constan tinople, and that the SULTAN is compelled impli citly to obey the instructions received from St. Pe tersburgh. No doubt Russia would be delighted to embroil the Porte in a quarrel with France and Eng land, and for this purpose no course can be better de vised than such a breach of faith on the part of the SULTAN as shall deprive the Divan of the support which it now receives from public opinion in England and France. Our Government must, therefore, act with caution as well as firmness. We must be careful in distinguishing between a ♦oluntary and compulsory insult ; and, above all, we must, if we desire to obtain any influence in Turkey, act as little in conjunction with Russia as possible. Since the above was written we have received advices which state that the Porte, at the instance of the Bri tish and French Ambassadors at Constantinople, had ordered the Turkish army to re-cross the Euphrates, and abstain from all further acts of hostility. They further assure us that despatches to this effect were ad dressed to the Consuls-General in Egypt for the infor mation of the VICEROY. Whether this be so or no, we continue to think a war in that quarter, for another year at least, as improbable as ever. ' The rumoured intelligence of war in the East, and the adroitness with which the Government turned it to account to add a fresh item to the Ordinary Budget, are the principal objects of discussion in the Paris journals of Sunday. The grant for increasing the fleet in the Mediterranean is net, however, condemned in any of the liberal journals ; but the Courrier Francais offers to take a wager that when the French ships of war are required in the Bosphorus, they will be cruising the mouth of the Tagus. What course that journal would recommend the Government of Louts PHILIPPE to pursue, will appear from the following extract : " It is not enough to have ships, men, and artillery, France must know who is her ally, and who is her enemy. As to her adopting coercive measures, blockading the Dardanelles or Alexandria, destroying the fleet of the Sultan or of the Pasha, it would be the height of cowardice and injustice. France ought to remain neutral in the struggle ; she must be satisfied with offering her mediation ; she has no ri4,ht to impose it. If hostilities have commenced, let God decide; the Mussulmans must be allowed freely to choose between the two empires and the two chiefs. We should beware of in flicting a deathblow on the Turkish empire, already so weakened by the encroachments and intrigues of Russia. Egypt, whose territory is coveted by England, is our ally, like all other infant nations forming maritime establish ments on the shores of the Mediterranean. Public opinion would curse the authors ofa second Navarino. Safety and honour require that Russia be compelled to observe a strict neutrality in the struggle, and prevented from again land ing troops in Constantinople. In the Chamber of Peers on Saturday the first article of a Copy-Right Bill was adopted. The dis cussion upon it was fixed for Monday. The Chamber of Deputies was engaged with plans for the better fortification of Paris ! What a satire upon the best of all possible Governments—a Mo narchy surrounded with Republican institutions. Madrid Papers, of the 19th instant, have been re ceived. Their moat important contents are anticipated by the following telegraphic despatch received by the French Government : " PERPIGNAN, MAY 24, EVENING.—On the 18th riots took place in Valencia, barricades were constructed, and the National Guard fought against the troops of the line. The motive of this emeule was the dissolution of the Cortes, and the independence of the kingdoms of Aragon, Va lencia, and Murcia. On the 20th tranquillity was re stored. Seven thousand Infantry and five hundred Ca valry of the division of General Asnau had entered at Liria. On the 19th Cabrera was near Chelva." Except the subjoined paragraphs there is no other news of interest in these papers : A letter from Algiers, dated the 17th of this month, and written by a person worthy of credit, contains the follow ing sentence :—." A conspiracy has been discovered at Constantine, the object of which was to massacre the French. This conspiracy was discovered just in time. The ringleaders are arrested. No details of this event are yet known, but nothing is more certain." More arrests took place at Paris yesterday. A letter from Avignon of 18th May, in the Ino, a Mar seilles journal, says :—" There has just been found on a suspected individual a list of the names of a hundred and fifty young men, said to form part of a certain conspiracy, armed at the expense of some such persons. Domiciliary visits have been made, in which some arms have been seized and some persons arrested.—Le Constitutionnel. HOUSE OF LORDS.-(THIS DAY The House sat to-day to hear Scotch appeals. The Peers present were the Lord Chancellor, Lord Montford, and Lord Charlemont. EWING V. BURNS. The further arguments in this part-heard appeal, from the decision of tile Court of Session, occupied their Lord ships the whale morning. The question in this case was, whether certain lands in the vicinity of Glasgow, called Ramshorn and Meadow flat, were liable to be assessed for the relief of the poor of the parish. The appellants arc the Lord Provost and the members of tho Town Council of Glasgow, who are in possession of the land in question ; and the respondents are the clergyman of the parish and the collector of the poor-rates there. Upon the case coming on before the Court of Session, that Court decided that the lands were liable to be assessed, and from tha decision the present appeal was brought. The arguments were proceeding when our Re VIC sorter left. E-CHANCERYTJ(TiIIIS DAY Cause petitions of no interest occupied his Honour the Vice-Chancellor the whole day. BAIL COURT.---:(THIDAY.) _ THE QUEEN V. WM. JOHNSON. The defendant in this case, who is a cotton-spinner, had been committed to the House of Correction, at Brixton, for six weeks, to hard labour, for having on the 9th of May, left certain work unfinished and quitted the service of his employer. Two objections were taken to the commitment, first that it set forth an offence over which the Magistrate had no jurisdiction, the defendant not coming with the de scription of servant ; and secondly, that the punishment was not warranted by tke statute under which the convic tion took place. A rule had been granted to show cause why he should not be discharged from custody. Mr. CHAMBERS was heard in support of the rule and Mr. C. JONES against it—Judgment deferred. THE QUEEN V. VVEI3II. Mr. BAILEY moved fora rule to s h ow cause why a man. damus should not issue against Mr. J ames W ebb, a Corm missioner for enclosing certain lands in the County o Salop, to compel him to make an award to Mr. Maddox.— Rule granted. COMMON PLEAS-(THIS DAY. JAMES V. ATTWOOD. This was an application to set aside an arbitration which had been agreed upon between the parties. The defen dant was the party to the well-known suit, " Small and Attwood," which has gone through such protracted litiga tion. The plaintiff had been engaged for some fourteen years past in assisting Mr. Attwood in the proceedings relative to his dispute with the British Iron Company ; and his exertions, it appeared, had been very instrumental in gaining Mr. Attwood the cause. They now, it would seem, disagreed about the demand which Mr. James made far remuneration, amounting to 1.5,0001. or 20,000/., which he had not required to be paid till Mr. Attwood had suc ceeded in his struggle, and had thereby been put in pos session of property, worth upwards of 600,0001. The ground on which the arbitration was objected to by Mr. James was that, through some recently discovered informality in the agreement, an indictment for perjury could not legally be sustained against any person giving false evidence before the arbitrator. Both the par ties had been examined, and Mr. James had felt it would be his duty to institute proceedings for perjury against some persons._ . . The Cuurt intimated an opinion that parties to a cats could not be witnessess, and therefore could not be swcra before the arbitrator, but took time to look into the autho rities. There was also an application for a new trial in a case respecting a collision between a gig and a cart, on the ground that since the trial certain fresh evidence had been found by the party who had lost the ♦erdict, which would rebut the evidence for the other party. The swearing (as usual in such cases) was most appallingly contradictory. The Court refused the application, giving it as their de cided opinion, that surprise could never be pleaded by a party in such cases, when it was the duty of both sides to bring forward the real facts as they occurred, of which the jury were to judge. THE MARKETS.-(THIS DAY HUNGERFORD MARKET. Fair supplies to-day of all descriptions, and trade good —prices much as formerly quoted. Turbot ss. to 15s. • Cod Is. 6d. to B s. ; Soles 10 d. to 6d. per pair ; Lob sters 10d. to 3s. 6d. ; Salmon 10d. to Is. 6d. per lb. ; Beef lid. to Si-d. ; Mutton 7d. to ; Veal Bd. to 9d. ; Pork 7kd. to Bid. CITY FISH MARKET. Supplies good, but trade:dull—prices reasonable. Tur. bot 4s. 6d. to ss. and 15s. ; Cod Is. 6d. to Bs. ; Soles 6d. to 3s. 6d. per pair ; Lobsters 10d. to 3s. 6d. ; Whiting sd. to 10d.: Haddocks Bd. to Is. 2d. ; Mackerel 6d. to Is. 2d. MAJORITY- Abercromby, G. R. —Stirlingsh ire Acheson, Lord—Co. of Armagh ) Adam, Rear-Adm: Sir C.—Clack.; mannan Aglionby, H. A.—Cockermouth Aglionby, Major F.—Cumberland Ainsworth, P.—Bolton Alston, Rowland—Hertfordshire Andover, Viscount—Malmsbury Anson, C'olonel—Staffordshire Anson, Sir G.—Lichfield Archbold, Robert—Kildare Attwood, Thos.—Birmingham Bainbridge, E. T.—Taunton Baines, Edward—Leeds Bannerman, A.—Aberdeen '3aring, F. Thornhill—Portsmouth Barnard, E. G.—Greenwich Barry, G. S.—Cork Co. Barron, H. W.—Waterford City ,ieamish, F. B.—Cork Bellew, R. M.—Louth Benett, J.—South Wiltshire Berkeley, Hon. F. H.—Bristc I Berkeley, Hon. G.—Gloucestersh. Berkeley, Hon. C.—Cheltenham Bernal, Ralph—Rochester Bewes, T —Plymouth Blackett, C.—South Northumber land Blake, Martin J.—Galway Blake, W. J.—Newport Blewitt, Reginald—Monmouth Blunt, Sir Charles --Lewes Bowes, John—South Durham Brabazon, Lied—Dublin Co. Bridgeman, Hewitt—Ennis Briscoe, J. I.—Westbury Brocklehurst, J.— Macclesfield Brodie, W. B.—Salisbury Brotherton, J.—Salford Browne, R. D.—Mayo Bryan, Maj. Geo.—Kilkenny Co. puller, Charles—Liskeard Buller, E.—North Staffordshire Bulwer, Sir E. L.—Lincoln Busfield, W.—Bradford Butler, Hon. P.—Kilkenny Co. Byng, George—Middlesex Byng, Right Hon. G.S —Chatham Callaghan, D.—Cork City Campbell, Sir John—Edinburgh Cave, Robert Otway—Tipperary Cavendish, Hon. C. C.—E. Sussex Cavendish, Hon. a. 11.—N. Derby Cayley, E. $.-I.t. Yorkshire Chalmers, Patrick—lnverbervie Chapman, Sir M. L.—Westmeath, Chester, Henry—Louth Co. Chetwynd, Major W.—Stafford Chichester, J. I'. B.—Barnstaple Childars, John W.—Malton Clay, W.—Tower Hamlets Clayton, Sir NVilliam—Marlow Clements, Visc.—Leitrim Co. Clive, Edward B.—Hereford Codringten, Sir E.—Devonport Collier. John—Plymouth Collins, NV.—Warwick Conyngham, Lord A.—Canterbury Craig, W. o.—Edinburglishire Crawford, W.—London Crawley, Samuel—Bedford Crompton, S.—Think Currie, Raikes—Northampton curry, 'William—Armagh Dalmeny, Lord—Stirling Dasliwood, G. H.—Wy combo Davies, Colonel—Worcester Denison, W. J.—West Sussex Denistoun, J.—Glasgow D'Eyncourt, Right Hon. C. T.— Lan heti'. Divett, Edward—Exeter Donkin, Sir IL—Sandwich Duff; James—Banffshire Duke. Sir James—Boston Duneombe, 'l'. S --Finsbury Dundas, e. W. D.—Flint Dundas, Frederick—Orkney Dundas, Hon. J. C.—York Dumras, Sir irobert—Richmond J.—Leicester Edwards, Sir John— Montgomery Eliot, Hon. J. E.—Roxburglishire Ellice, Capt. A.—Harwich Ellice, Right Hon. E.—Coventry Ellice, Edward—St. Andrew's Ellis, Wynn—Leicester Erie, Wm. —Oxford Etwall, Ralph—Andover Euston, Earl—Thetford Evans, Sir G. De Lacy—Westmin ster Evans, G.—Dublin County Evans, William —North Derby Fenton, John—Rochdale Ferguson, Sir R. C.—Nottingham Ferguson,Sir R. A.—Londonderry Ferguson, Robert —Kirka!dy Finch, F.—Walsall Fitzalan, Lord—Arundel Fitzgibbon ' Hon. R.—Limerick Fitzpatrick, J. NV —Queen's Co. Fitzroy, Lord C—Bury St. Eilm. Fleetwood, P. H.—Preston Fort, J.—Clitheroe French, F.—Rosscommon Gillon, IVm. D.—Linlithgow Gordon, Robert—Windsor Goring, H. D.—New Shoreham Goulburn, Right Hon. H.—Cam. bridge University Grattan, James—Wicklow Co. Grattan, Henry—Meath Greenaway, Charles—Leominster Grey, Sir Charles Edwarct—Tyne. mouth Grey, Sir George—Devonport Grosvenor, Lord R.—Chester Grote, George—London Guest, J. J.—Merthyr Tydvil Hall, Sir Benjamin—Marylebone Hallyburton, Lord D. G.—Forfar Handley, Henry—Lincolnshire Harland, William C.—Durham Harvey, D. W.—Southwark Hastie, Archibald—Paisley Hawes, Benjamin—Lambeth lawkins, J. H.—Newport, Isle of, Wight Nayter, W. G.—Wells Heathcoat, J.—Tiverton Heathcote„ G. J.—Lincolnshire Hector, Cornthwaite John—Pe tersfleld Heneage, Edward—Grimsby Heron, Sir R.—Peterborough Hill, Lord A. M. C.—Evesham Hindley, Charles—Ashton Hobhouse, Right Hon. Sir J. C. Nottingham Hobhouse, T. Benj.—Rochester Hodges, 'l' L.—West Kent Hollond, Robert—Hastings Horsman, Edward— Cockermouth Hoskins, K.—Herefordshire Howard, F. J.—Youghall Howard, P. H.—Carlisle Howick, Visc.—Northumberland Hume, Joieph—Kilkenny iumphery, John—Southwark Hurst, R. H.—Horsham Hutt, W.—Hull Hutton, Robert—Dublin James, William—Cumberland Jervis, J.-- Ch ester TELLERS. Steuart, Robert—Haddington, Sm. Stanley, E. John—North Cheshire. MINORITY— Acland, Sir T. D.—.N Devonshire Acland, T. D.—West Somerset %. 'Court, Captain—Tamworth AdAre Lord—Glamorganshire Alford, Viscount—Bedfordshire Alsager, R.—Surrey Arbuthnot, General—Kincardine shire Archdall, Gen. M.—Fermanagh Ashley, Lord—Dorsetslaire Ashley, Cooper, Hon. A. H.—Do r. c h es t e r Atwood, W.—Greenwich Attwood, M.—Whitehaven Bagge, W.—West Norfolk Bagot, Hon. W.—Denbighshire Bailey, Joseph—Worcester Bailey, J. D.—Sudbury Baillie, H. D.—Honiton Baker, Edward —Wilton Baring, F.—Thetford Baring, H. B.—Marlborough Baring, W. B.—N. Staffordshire Barneby, John—Worcestershire Barrington, Lord—Berkshire Bateson, Sir R.—Londonderry bell, Matthew—S. Northumber land Ben thick, Lord G.—Lynn Bethel!, Richard—Yorkshire -NOES, 299. Copeland, W. T.—Stoke-upon. Trent Corry, Hon. H. L.—Tyrone Co. Courtenay, P.—Bridgewater Crcsswell, Cresswell—Liverpool Cri lips, Joseph—Cirencester Dalrymple, Sir A.—Brighton Da, er, Hon. G.—Portarlington Jarby, George—East Sussex Darlington, Earl of Davenport, J.—Stoke. umn.Tren t De Horsey, S. H.—Newcastle under Lyme Dick, Quintin—Maldon D'lsraeii, B.—Maidstone Dottin, A. R.—Southampton Douglas, Sir C. E.—Warwick Dowdeswell, W.—Tewkesbury Duffield, I homas— Abingdon Dugdale, W. S.—Warwickshire Dunbar, George—Belfast Duncombe, Hon. W.—Yorkshire Duncombe, Hon A —Ea4t Retford Dangannon, Lord—Burham Du Pre, George—Buck East, James Buller—Winchester Eastnor, Viscount—Reigate Eaton, R. J.—Cambridgeshire Egerton, W. Tatton—Cheshire Egerton, Sir P.—Cheshire Egerton ' Lord F. L.—Lan cas hi re Eliot, Lord—East Cornwall i Ellis, Jno.—Newry Estcourt, T. G. B.—Oxford Univ. Estcourt, T. Junior —revises (Farnham, F.3.—N. Leic es t ers hi re IFt-Farrand Johnbtaffor ctor, Al netaidstone Feilden, W. J.—Blackhnni veilowes, Edw.—Huntingdonshire Fdmer, Sir E.—West Kent Fitzroy, lion. Henry—Lewes Fleming, John—Hampshire Foley, E. T.—Herefordshire Follett, Sir W.—Exeter) Forester, Hon. G.—Wenlock Vcx, Geo. Lane—Beverly Fremantle, Sir Thonizs —Bucks Fre .htield, James Wm.—Penryn Gasket!, Janie: Milnes—Wenlock Gladstone, W. E.—.Newark.on Trent Glynne, Sir S. R.—.Flintshire Goddard, Ambrose—Cricklade Godson, R.—Kidderminster Ga•don, Hon. W.—Aberdeenshire Gore, 0. J. R.—Carnarvonshire Gore, Ormstly—Salop Graham, Right Hon. Sir J. R. G. Bt.—Pembroke Grant, F. W.—lnvtrness-shire Greene, T. G.-.. Lancashire Grimsditch. T. —Macclesfield Grimsto,. " Viscount—Hertford- L ahjre Grimston, Hon. E. H --s t• 1 " . ban s Hale, B. R.—Gloucestershire Harcourt,H a 1 ford G. G. Henry—Leiceste rshire V . —Oxfordshire Blacklitirne, I. J.—Warrington Blackstone, W. S.—Wallingford Blair, J. Wigtooshire Blakemore, Richard—Wells Blan d ford, Marquisof— Woodstock Blennerhassett, A.—Kerry Boldero, Henry G.—Chippenham Bolling, W.—Bolton Bradshaw, James—Canterbury Bramston, T. W.—Essex South Broadley, Henry—East Yorkshire Broadwo id, Henry—Bridgewater B ownrigg, J. S.—Boston Bruce, Loid E.—Marlborough Bruges, W. H. L.-131.th Buck, L W. Buller, Sir J. Yardc—Devonshire Burdett, Sir F.—N. Wiltshire burr, D -H. D.—Hereford Burrell, Sir C.—Shoreham Burroughes, H. N.—East Norfolk Calcraft, John Hales—Wareham Canning, Right Hon. Sir S.—Lynn' Cantilupe, Viscount—Helston Cartwright, Wm. IL—South Nor thamptonshire Castlereagh, Visct—Down Co. Chapman, Aaron—Whitby Christopher, B. A.—Lincolnshire Chute, W. L. W.—West Norfolk Clerk, Sir G.—Stamford R. H. South Shropshire Codrington, C. W.—Gloueeatersh. Cole, Hon. Arthur H.—Enniskillen Cole, Viscount—Ferman ag h Colquhoun, John C.—iittlflU Comptono. , cOlCalx!"—lianipshire Conolly, zor:; , ar (i M.—Donegal cooper, E. J.—Sligo Co. Coote, Sir C.—Queen's County PARLIAIVIENTAR.Y DI VISION, (From the Poles and Proceedings of the Rouse of Commons.) 310NDAT, MAY 27, 1839. --- ELECTION OF SPEAKER. The Sergeant came and brought the Mace, and laid it under the Table. Then Lord John Russell, addressing himself to the Clerk, who (standing up, pointed to him, and then sat down), acquainted the House that her Majesty baying been informed of the resignation of the Right Honourable James Abercromby, late Speaker of this House, gives leave to the House to proceed forthwith to the choice of a new Speaker. Then Henry Handley, Esq., stood up, an d, a dd ress i ng himself to the Clerk, proposed to the House Charles Shaw Lefevre, Esq., for their Speaker, an d move d, " That Charles Sha w Lefevre, Esq., do take the Chair of this House as Speaker ;" in which motion he was seconded by the Right Honourable Stephen Lushington, D.C. L. Then the Right. Honourable Charles Wynn, addressing himself to the Clerk, pruposcd to the House the Right Honourable Henry Goulburn for their Speaker, and moved, " That the Right Honourable Henry Goulburn do take the Chair of this House as Speaker;" in which motion he was seconded by Mr. Wilson Patten, and sup ported by Mr. William Duncombe. And thereupon the said Charles Shaw Lefevre, Esq., and this Right Honourable Henry Goulburn, respectively addressed themselves to the House. Then the question was put by the Clerk—" That Charles Shaw Lefevre, Esq., do take the Chair of this House, as Speaker :"—The Clerk declared the Yeas had it :—The House was divided : The Yeas to the Old L.olsby. Noes to the New Loihy. Mr. Edw. John Stanley 317 Tellers for the Yeas, j Mr. Rob ert S teuart / Tellers for the Noes, 5 Mr. Ch ar l es W ynn j Mr. Wilson Patten 299 So it was resolved in the affirmative. Whereupon the said Charles Shaw Lefevre, Esq., was conducted to the Chair by Mr. Handley and Dr. Lush ington, where being placed, he expressed himself truly sensible of the honour which the House had been pleased to confer upon him ; and the Mace was then laid on the Table. Then Lord John Russell having congratulated Mr. Speaker Elect, signified the pleasure of her Majesty that the House should present their Speaker To-morrow, at three o'clock, in the House of Peers, for her Majesty's Royal approbation ; and then moved, " That the House de adjourn till to-morrow." Adjourned at half after Five o'Clock. -AYES, 317. Jervis, S.—Bridport /Johnson, W. Augustus—Oldham Kinnaird, Hon. A. F.—Perth Labouchere, Right Hon. Henry — Taunton Lambton, H.—North Durham Langdale, Hon. C.—Knaresbo rough Langton, Col Gore—Somerset Leader, J. 'Temple—Westminster Lemon, Sir Chas.—W. Cornwall I Lennox, Lord J. G.—West Sussex Lennox, Lord A.—Chichester Leveson, Lord—Morpeth I.ister, E. Canliffe—Bradford , Loch, James —Kirkwall ! Lushington, Charles—Ashbnrton 'Lashington, Rt. Hon. S—Tower Hamlets Lynch, A. H.—Galway M'Leod, R.—lnverness M'Namara, Maj. W. N.—Clare Co. M e raggart, John—Wigton, &c. Marshall, Wm.--Carlisle , Marsland, Henry—Stockport Martin, John—Tewkesbury Martin, Thomas—Galway Co. !Mule, Hon. Fox—Elgin Burghs Melgund, Viscount —Hythe Mildmay, I'. St. John—Winches ter Milton, Lord—Malton Molesworth, Sir William—Leeds Moreton, A. H.—Gloucestershire Morpeth, Lord—Yorkshire Morris, D.—Carmarthen Murray, Alex.—Kirkcudbright Muskett, George A.—St. Alban't Nagle, Sir 11—Wesimeath 'sorreys, Sir Denham —Mallow O'Brien, Cornelius—Clare O'Brien, W. S.—Limerick Co. O'Callaghan, llon.C.—Dungarvan O'Connell, Daniel-- Dublin O'Conn:Rl, John—Athlone O'Connell, M. J.—Kerry O'Connell, Morgan—Meath C'Oonnell, Maurice—Tralee O'Connor Don—Roscommon Co. , °Terrell, Richard M.—Kildare Ord, W.—Newcastle-upon-Tyne Paget, Lord Alfred—Lichfield Paget, Frederick—Beaumaris Palmer, Charles lystie—Readygg Palmerston, Viscount—Tivertat Parker ' John—Shettield Parnell, Sir H. Dundee Parrott, Jasper—Totness Pattison, James--London Pease, Joseph—South Durham Nell ell, Captain—Bright e n Pendarves, E. W.W. Cornwall Philipps ' Sir IL—Hav er i or d weat Philips, Mark—Manchester Philips, G. H.—Poole Phillpotts, John—Gloucester Pigor, a ft.—Clonmel Pinney, W.—Lyme Regis Ponsonby, C. F. A. C.—Poole Ponsonby, Hon. John—Derbj Power, James—Wexford Co. Power, John—Waterford Price, Sir R.—Heref or d s hi re Protheroe, Edward —Halifax Pryme, tieurge—Cambridge Pry se, Pryse—Cardigan Ramsbottoin, J.—Vi indsor Redington, T. N.—Dundalk Rice, Edward Royd— Dover Rich, H.—Knaresborough lt ippon, C.—Gateshead . Roche, E. B.—Cork Co. Roche, William —Limerick Roche, Sir David—Limerick Rolfe, :ir R. M.—Penryn Rumbold, C. E.—Yarmouth Rundle, John—Tavistock Russell, Lord John—Stroud Russell, Lord—Tavistock Russell, Lord C. J. F.--fledfordsh. Rutherford, Rt. Hon. A.—Leith salwey, .Liunt... COL Ludlow Sanfora, .B. A.--somersetshire Seholetield, J.—Birmingham Scrope, Poulett—Stroud Seale, Colonel—Dartmouth Seymour, Lord—Totneas Sharpe, General—Dumfries Shell, Richard Lalor—Tipperary Shelborne, Earl of—Calve Slaney, R. A.—Shrewsbury Smith, J. A.—Chichester ,Smith, Benjamin—Norwich Smith, Hon. R.—Wycombe Smith, R. V.—Northampton Somers, J. P.—Sligo Somerville, Sir \V.—Drogheda Speirs, Alexander—Richmond Spencer, Hon F.—Midhurst Standish, Charles—Wigan Stanley, W. Massey—Pontefract Stanley, W. o.—Anglesea Stanstleld, W. R. C.— Huddersflel Staunton, Sir George Thomas Stewart, James—Honiton Stock, Dr.—Cashel Straugways, Hon. John—Dorset ,Strickland, Sir G.—W• Yorkshire Strutt, Edward—Derby Stuart, Lord J.—Ayr Stuart, Villiers—Waterford Co St) le, Sir Charles —Scarborough 'Surrey, Earl of—West Sus sex i l Talbot , C. It. M.—Glam organs hi re I Talfourd, Mr. Serjeant —Reading • Tancred, H. W.—Banbury .'Thomson, Rt. Hon. C. P.—Man chester Thoniely,Thos.—Wolverhampton Townley, R. G —Cambridgeshire Troubridge, Sir T. E—Sandwich Turner, Edmund—Truro Turner, W.—Blackburn • Verney, Sir H.—Buckinghamshire Vigors, N. A.—Carlow Co. Villiers, (... P.—Wolverhampton Vivian, Major Charles—Bodmin Vivian, John Henry—Swansea Vivian, Sir R. H.—East Cornwall ' Wakley, Thomas—Finsbury Walker, R.—Bury, Lancashire Wallace, Robert—Greenock Warburton, H.—Bi Ripon Ward, H. G.—Sheffield Westenra, Hon.H R.—Monaghan Westenra Hon. J. C.—Kin g ' s C o. White, Andrew —Sunderl a nd White, Henry—Longford White, Luke—Longford ' I White Lieut, - Col. Saml.—L e i trim ' Wilbraham, George—Cheshire Wilde, Mr. Serjeant—Newark Williams, William —Coventry Williams, W. A.—Monmenthsh, Wilshere, Williain—Yarmouth Vr innington, H. J.—Worcestersh. Winnington, T. E.—Bewdley Wood, Charles—Halifax Wood, Sir Matthew —London Wood, 0. W.—Kendal Worsley, Lord—Lincolnshire Wrightson, W. B.—Northallerton Wyse, Thomas-- Waterfora Yates, J. Ashton -Carlow EVEN - 1 i G Harcourt, G. S.—Bucks . Hardinge, Right Hon. Sir H.—. Launceston Hawkes, Thomas—Ducilcy Haves, Sir E.—Donegal Hencage, G W.—Devizes Henniker, Lord—East Suffolk Hepburn, Sr' . - Haddingtonshirc Herbert, lion. S.—South Wilts Herries, Rt. Hon. J. C.—Harwia Hill, Sir Rolvland—Slircpc,hire Hillsborough, rarl el . —Down Ilinde, J. Hodgson—Newcastle upon-Tyne Hodgson, Frederick—Barnstaple: Ho dgson4 l ld.—Berwick-on-Tweed Hogg, James Weir—Beverley Holmes, Hon. W.—lsle of Wight Holmes, W.—Berwick-onTweed Hope, Charles—Linlithgowshire Hope, H. 'l'.—Gloucester Hope, G. W.—Wevrnouth Hotham, Lord—Leominster Hould-sworn, T.—Nottnignamsh. Houston, G. J.—Renfrewshire Howard, lion. W. —Sutherlandsh Hughes, W. B.—Carnarvon Hurt, Francis —Derby South lngestre, Viscount —Staffordshire Inglis, Sir It. H.--Ox. University Irtim, Samuel—Cumberland Irving, John—Antrim,Co. Jackson, M r. Serj.—Bandon Bridge James, Sir W. C.—Hull Jenkins, Richard —Shrewsbury Jerilyn, Earl —Bury, Suffolk Johnstone, J. 15.-I'surfriesshire, Jones, John—Carmarthensbire Jones, Wilson —Denbigh Jones, T. — Londone.erry Co. Kelly, Fitzroy —Ipswich Kemble, H.—West i3urrey Kabul - tie, Lord Kirk, Peter—Carrickfergus Knatchhull, Sir K —East Kent Knight, H. G.—Nottinghamshir e Knighticy, Sir C.—Northampton shire Knox, Hon. Thomas—Dungannon Lascelles, Hon. W. S.—Wakefield. Law, lion. C. E.— Cambridge Univ. Lefevre, C. Shaw—North Hants ) Lefroy, - Rt. Hon. T.—Dublin Uni-! versity Liddell, Hon. IL—North Durham, Lincoln, Earl of—South Notts Litton, Edward—Coleraine Lockhart, A. M.—Lanarkshire Long, W.—North Wiltshire Lowther, Colonel—Westmoreland Lowther, Viset.—Westmoreland Lowther. J. H.—York Lucas, Edward—Monaghan Lygon, Major-Gen. Hon. H. B.— Worcestershire West. Mackenzie, Thomas—Ress-shire Mackenzie, W. F.—Peeblesshire Mackinnon, W. A.—Lymington Maclean, Donald —Oxford Mahon, Viscount— Hertford Maidstone, Visct.—N. Northamp tonshire Manners, Lord C. S.—Leicestersh. Marsland, Thomas—Stockport Marton, Geo.—Lai.caster Master, Colonel—Cirencester Matthew, G. B.—Shaftesbury Maunsell, T. P.—Northanapt•nsh. Meynell, Captain H.—Lisburne Miles, William—Sornersetshire Miles, Philip W. Skynner —Bristol) Miller, %V. H.—Newcastle-under. Lyme Mihies, R. M.—Pontefract Monypenny, T. G.—Rye Moraatint, Sir John—Warwicksh. Morgan, C. M. R.—Brecon Necld, Joseph—Chippenhain Neeld, John—Cricklade Nichol), J —Cardiff Noel, William ll.—Rutland ANA For Mr. Shaw Lefevre For Mr. Goulburn Tellers Nine Pairs Ten Liberals absent Six Tories ditto Two seats on each side vacant ,YSIS. 317 299 Mr. Cowper, the new M em b er f or H ertford, did not vote; he had intended to do so, but the Tories said if he did they would dispute his right, he not having been sworn since his re-elec tion, and the case being different from that of a new Parlia ment; he therefore declined raising the question. On the occasion of the election of the late Speaker,:Mr. Aber cromby, the numbers were— For Mr. Abercromby For Mr. Manners Sutton 306 Majority MONEY mid COMMERCIAL NEWS CIY. TWELVE O'CLO Cg Arrivals this morning— T One French mail, no ship letters. The New York packet ship, of the Ist instant, still re. mains due. LIYERPOCL COTTON MARKET OF MONDAY.—W O have had a very active demand for Cotton to-day, which, being met by the holders, 5,000 bags have been taken at id. ad vance on last week's rates, 1,700 bags taken on speculation. The only intelligence this morning c,f any consequence is relating to the hostilities said to hate commenced in the East between the Turks and Egyrtians; the various ac. counts on the subject are so contradictory that we must wait for further intelligence on tl - ,e subject. By accounts received from Buenos Ayres, via France, although not of so recent dales as previously received, are still interesting. They state that Roses did not seem dis posed to make peace on the terms demanded in the ulti matum of Roger, the French Consul ; but in the mean.. time the blockade di'd not effect the country so much as the French anticipated : the internal resources of the country have been developed in a remarkable manner, and the only injury it lar.d caused was in the paper money, which was reduced to 4d. THE FUNDS, Consols, which closed yesterday at 931- i for Money and Account, tpened at 931 i ; and for July Account 931. This being settling-day in the British Market, the chief business doing at present is adjusting the accounts. Exchequer Bills 26 28; India Bonds 30 32 ; Bank Stock 195 196 ; India Stock 255 260. In the Foreign Market Spanish Active 191, ; Portu g uese 851; Three per Cents. 214; Brazilian 79i 80; Belgian 101 i 102 ; Colombian 3 0.1 31i ; Mexica n 26i ; D utch TO2 wo-and-a-Half pe r Ceuta. 85i 56i; Five p er C ents . 1i i. We have very few arrivals. Bank FRICS OF STOCKS THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK. Stock 196 5 5 ' India St oc k 3 per C ent. Red. ......... .......92%% Ditto Bonds 3O 93 pm. 3a per Co n t. C ons —. % per Cent....... . . . .... - Old Annuities... ............. Ditto Red, 99 r4N New Ditto .. —. New 3% per Cent till lOU% 1% 1 3 per Cent. Annuities, 1751 ---, New 5 pe r C ent. --. p Exch. Bills, £l,OOO 27 24 28 pm. Jan. 5, 186 Bank Long Ann n i t i es toex ire Ditto... ............ 500 ... —O. 14 7-16% Ditt o 5ma11.,.,,,, pm ' ........ 25 Oct. 10, 18,5 , i l4 3-16 Ditt o Commercial ..... pm. Jan. 5, tEr, o 14 11-16 Ditto Advertised ....... 24 2. per. 6 p Jan. 5, YBSO .— B an k S teck for Account .. Aprils, 1680. — India Stoek for Account ... --- Jan. 5 1870 — Consos for Account ...... 93% K. PRICES OF FOREIGN FUNDS THIS DAY AT ONE, O'CLO Austrian Bonds —l Peruvian Bonds... ............CK.Belgian Brazilian Bonds Buenos Ayres Bonds ! Ditto, 3 per Cent. Ditto Account ......... ..... j Ditto Account 01541 Chilian Bonds atto Account ..„ ......... .. Russian Bonds: Mt Columbian Bonds i Ditto Account Ditto Account Columbian Bonds, 1824 .. j Spanish Bonds Ditto Account •:E Clli 1 SON , Ditto Account. Danish Bonds Ditto Account Greek Bonds —' F rench, 5 per sent. ....A 11 f. 50:- Ditto Bonds, 1825 — • ---- 4 per cent...„.. —f. —a. Ditto Account ' ---- 8 per cent. —f. —r. Mexican Bonds, 5 per Cent — , --- Exchange. 2sf. 4Ce. Ditto Account ' Dutch, 24 per sent Ditto, 6 per Cent. • Ditto Account 56 Ditto Account Neapolitan. ' Ditto Account.... ...... PRICES OF SHARES THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK . Paid. Per are. Eastern Counties Railway ................ 16 164,4 Great Western Railway C0nepany............ .. 65 734 j London and Southampton aiLuchester and Birmingham Rai1way........ 15 Do. Do. E xtension worth Midland Railway Company ........ Colcnial Bank 25 8054 RALF-A ST eivx We have no f urt h er arr i vals to communicate. The settling of the Consul Account is going off well to the present time, and no doubt will end without any culties being experienced, as the extreme fluctuation dur ing the Account has only been about 1 Y per cent. ; in the early part of the morning itk was a Bull, since which it has rather turned Bearish. Consols, which in the course of the morning reached 932-, at present may be quoted 934 for Money, and 93t for July Account ; Exchequer Bills receded to 24, but have improved to 27 28; India Bonds 30; India Stock 2561 2551; Bank Stock 196. In the Foreign Market Spanish Active 19i; Portu guese 35i; Three per Cents. 21i ' 1 ; Colomkian 301 Mexican 26;} • Danish 74; Dutcb-Tvro-and-a- Half per Cents. 56,} ; Five per Cents. 1024. LLOYD S' SHIPPING-(THIS DAY.) DEAL, MAY 24.—Wind E I S. E., fine.—Came down from the river and sailed, the Magnet, Spark, New York. PORTSMOUTH, MAY 27. —Wind S.—Sailed the Owen Glendower, Polley, for Madras and Calcutta. PLYMOUTH, MAY 27.—Wind variable. FALMOUTH, MAY 26.—Wind variable.—Sailed the Elysio, Callers, for St. Petersburg. LIVERPOOL, MAY 27.—Sailed the England, Garner, for Quebec. Off port the Bootle, from Porto Cabello; Dam. frieshire, New Orleans ; Victor, Mobile. Dom:, MAY 26.—Arrived the Sophia Cecilia, Rade loff, from Amsterdam for Surinam, very leaky, and must discharge. Cowan, MAY 27.—Arrived the Christiana, "Celver, from Stockholm. BRIDPORT, MAY 25.—Arrived off port, the Fortuna, Boulaw, from Memel. POOLE, MAY 26.—Arrived the Seal, from Cadiz. SALCOMBE, MAY 26. —Arrived the Hector, Kincaid, from Amsterdam ; and Apollo, Bordeaux. Sue°, MAY 25.—Arrived the Industry, Barret, from Memel. Sailed the Hope, Douglas, from Quebec ; and Jassy, Jackson, ditto. HULL, MAY 27.--Wind S.W.—A'rrivad the Transit (steamer). Roach, from Hamburg ; Elizabeth, Allen, Ditto; Haabet, Hansen, Kiel; Trene, Ewart, Memel ; Eugenia, Voltz, Dantzic ; Johann a Maria, Larsen, Got tenburg ; Erin (steamer), J:fayden, Dunkirk; Sea Horse (steamer), Banch, Rott,erdam; and Anion, Tregar then, Gallipoli. YAkMOUTII, MAY 25. Arrived the Einigheden, \Yd.- son, from Gottenburg. HARWICH, MAY 2 7.---Sailed Gute Bote, Runer, Memel BRIGHTON, MAY 2N.. — Off port—Noah, Milne, Madc LA. , • We regret to. h av e to announce th e death of General the HOT,. Robert Taylor, uncle to the Marquis of Headfort, at Us seat. Davestown, in Irelaad, on the 23d inst. The, Hon. General, who was in his 79th year, was Colonel or the 6th Dragoons, or Carabinerz. ETON COLLEGE ABUSES... \\7e some time since noticed a question on the Law of Marriage, likely to ttuderge a l-egal inquiry, concerni ng a privilege claimed by the Provost , and we believ e exercised at Eton for nearly a century past—the ref u s a l to marry by any other than his own license. The cause, from the time we first no ticed it, has been proceeding until within these few daps when the Rev. Dr. Goodall, having discovered his error, wrote an apologizing letter to the Archbishop, who has consented to stay all further proceedings upon his pforeis ing never to offend in like manner again,-.-Beedirri Me. A. 141.7 r -N .j. lIS T.- )rreysif- „,_ Owen, • • i 11, Macke, ( 7 4.4 f gi c , I . al:ingtot) \-:, Palmer, R i Palmer, Go - f•jo .. Parker, Mc - AS Parke. - , it. '111.4-at "'. • • i p aka, I'. A. W.-Oxtordshlre Peel, Rt. Hon.l,ir R.-Tsm worth Pcal, Col. Jonathan-Funtinoon Pemberton, Thomas-Ripon Perceval, Colonel-Sligo Co. ,Perceval, G. J.- West Surrey Pigot, Robert-Bridgnorth Planta, Joseph-Hastings Plumptre, John P.-East Kent Polhill, Frederick-Bedford Pollen, Sir J.-Andover Pollock, Sir F.-Huntingdon Powell, Colonel- -Cardiganshire 1 Powerscourt, Viscount-Bath Praed, W. M.-Aylesbury Praed, W. T.-st. Ives i Price, Richard-New Rad nor !Pringle, Alexander-Selkirk.shire Posey, Philip-B_ Islatre Rae, 11.ght tlon. Sir Wm.-Bute Reks, Sir J. Rae-Dover Richards, Itichard-Merionettish. 1 lt , ek ford, \V.-A y l es b ury i RAleston, Col.-S. Nottingdana 1 Rose, Sir George-Christchurch Round, Charles Gray-Essco: N. Round, John-Maldon Rushbrooke, Colonel-Suffolk illushoLt, Geo. Bowles-Eveshim ISt. Paul, H.-E. Worcestershire Sanderson, Richard-Colchester ,Sandon, Lord-Liverpool 'Shaw, Hon. 3, y.— Guildford Shaw, Rt. Hon. F.-Dublin link'. Sheppard, Thomas-n-orue Shirley, E. J -Warwickshire Sibtliorp, Colonel -Lincoln ;Smith, Sir George- Caithimst (Smith, Abel-Hertfordshire Smyth, Sir G. H.-Colchester Somerset, Lord G.-Monmetithsh. !Stanley, EdwartiCumberland' 'Stanley, Lord-North Lancashire iStewart, John-.Lyrnington Stormont, Viscount-Perthshire !Sturt, Henry Chasi-Dersetshire Sugden, Sir E.-Ripon Teignmouth, Lord-M3Tylebone 'ferment, J. E.-Belfast Thomas, Colonel-Kinsale Thompson, Ald.-Sunderland I hornhill, G.-Huntingdonshire Tollemache, Hon. E.-Grantham Trench, Sir F.-Scarborough Tyrrell, Sir J. T.-North Essex Vere, Sir C. 8.-East Suffolk " Verner, William-Armagh Co. Vernon, G. H.-East Retford Villiers, Viscount-Weymouth Vivian, John Eiinis-Truto Waddington, H. S.-West Suffiiik Wall, C. Baring-Guildford Walsh, Sir John-Sudbury Welby, Glynne Earle-Grantham Whitmore, T. C.-Bridgenorth Wilbraham, Hon. R. 8.-Lanca. shire Williams, Robert-Dorchester Williams, T. Peers-Marlow Wilmot, Sir J. E.-Warwickshire Wodehouse, Edmund-Norfolk Wood, Colonel T.-Brecon Wood, Thomas-Middlesex Wyndham, Wadham -Salisbury Wynn, Sir W. W.-Denbighsaire Yorke, Hon. E. T.-Cambridgekh Young, John -Cavan Young, Sir W.-Bucks r ,3?‘, TIILLERS. Wynn, Right Hon C.W.—Mont. gomeryshire Patten, J. Wilson—Lancashire . - E - i - 7 i'.c.•••• l / 4 '-- * 'N'A f '' P Artl ia jr z l''*.• . • -,4 ''s So tt' ll - t ‘ kL i HIS xpect lation , s the refer. inted mom doves .re re- Some imate new thesis er, a .!. rare r the a no r dis esent yston great f the laby ;enee. Mr. grace Vol. ed on vain. , Mr. hered have n tie , sse d, l uent .lal no ereir d and folio most ether coa- Can wry chest. .what [ the affect same the and rices they suc y, in ,p of ,here F , ,s of Li for Dress i the 1 , a t keen end, into into ,tton riceg