The Sun. — London, England, 1845-04-16 00:00:00

ed yam ,g e t ttg' t t antin e kzrY terarf so 4 widen terr"" zw,iti r b 7,7%-i f m"l 40 4' S . liz'f: kv `-‘ , 4 0 4 1 / 4 1 , I SUN OFFICE, Seven o' Clock. SPIRIT of the PUBLIC JOURNALS. FROM THE EVENING PAPERS OF THIS DAT. GLOBE.—Sir Robert Peel is the male Catherine de Medicis of modern Conservatism. There is areal duplicity, as Ranke has said of his female prototype, not in his words, or in his actions only, but in his mind. He has two strings to his bow; he is always for sitting on two stools. This dupli city of view and ofconduct, as in the lady above-mentioned, so in the present gentleman, after attempting to play one party against the other, ends at last in a violent crisis. Catherine first leaned towards the Protestants—and ended by enacting the Saint Bartholomew. Peers Protestantistn seems drawing to its catastrophe in a similarly violent situation. lie has driven his own original party to bay—and it stands at bay. He has thrown himself on Whig sup- Port ; and he will have to take it, we surmise, on Whig t erms. Consistency of principle demands that the party in Opposition should speak their whole mind on the Whole extent of the Irish Church question. It is forced upon them ; they have not factiously forced it upon the Government. On the contrary, they have, thus far, given the Government the most unreserved support. The public, however, has spoken out, and shown itself strongly per suaded that (as we stated) what is proposed is one thing— what is argued for is another. The Minister's act indi cates intentions which are universally received with im mense distrust. And his argumentative supporters make the matter worse. They demonstrate that much more remains behind. Mr. Gladstone on Friday, Mr. Milnes yesterday, let the cat terribly out of the bag. The country sees clearly enough that this is only a beginning of new church policy. And they will have Sir Robert Peel begin nothing of which they don't see the end. As an Irish dealer, th ey will buy no pig in the poke from him. Now, in this m atter, the Oppo s ition leade r s h ave em b ar k e d i n the same boat with Sir R. Peel. Unless, however, they mean to commit Party suicide for the sake of his beaux yeux (to say nothing of t he sartorial " sacrifices to the graces" which Mr. Grant has attributed to him)—they must declare all they would do with the Irish Churches, and how they would do it. The widest p oss ible unpopularity has been already incurred by both Parties. The patty in power may get out of it how they can - that is no c o n cer n of th e p ar ty i n Opposition. What t he) have to think of is simply to eonnect their present c onduct with their past professions; and set forth, in their full extent the principles on which they have followed the kinisterial move. Those principles may not be less un popular than that move is —but, if true, they must make W ay- The unpopularity is incurred—tout est perdu fors I* hon ro*--it is fo r Opp os iti on t o t a k e goo d care t h a t h onour, at i s a,st, shall be sa t e , an d th a t th e countr y s h a ll k now w h ere to look for men—not to consult its momentary pleasure—but to Chalk out a clearfuture course. Sir R. Peel sits like Joe Miller's Je w at dinner, aghast at the sudden thunder-storm—" Here a piece of work about one little bit of bacon !" But Eve n the little bit of bacon leads the public to infer t he whole b. that little bit is more than the public will tolerate og , With out knowing what is to f o llow. Si r R. Peel has made by`ue great mi s t a k e t h at h e cou ld k eep P rotestant zea l quiet treating the thing as nothing new, while the Irish majority are to take it as something new. This is adding distrust and su s p ense t o i nev it a bl e P ro t e stant unpopu larity' The duplicity is perceived ; and if it had not, his supporters have taken good care to disclose Two such speeches as Mr. Gladstone's and Mr. ililnes' involve all that Mr. Ward's motion menaced, and something more. They involve the positive patronage of Warnsh priesthood, as teachers of the people, while 'P.- motion only went to deal with surplus eccle astical funds (such as those Mr. Hume last night men tioned), for general educational purposes. Mr. Glad stone, therefore, and Mr. Milnes, go farther than "r. Ward went towards directly superseding Protestant outs,rY as rega r ds R om an Catholic masses. Th e y teal directly patronise another ministry, as effec hint], where th e f ormer i s i ne ff ec t ua l— a nd u n l es s th ey up old the preposte rous a b sur dity, that where that acknow ledged inefficacy exists, and where, on that very gro un d, the y would erect State machinery to supply other agencies Zthe non -working wheels are to go on being oiled "for e look of the thing," and the public to be taxed for • in oil f or t h e working ones, as we ll as for putting them ~1 1 gear "at first starting—unless this preposterous nrdity is asserted, Sir Robert Peel's argumentative !adherents espouse the appropriation clause, and something ore. I s it for the Whigs to dissemble that a new principle involved here; and to shrink from declaring that prin. Itl2le, in the whole extent to whEch they would act upon This appears simply due to themselves on the p a rt of the Opposition. Dlr. Milnes stated it to be " his littrtion that the country was not at the present time ! ni seeptilA of the arguments which had been adduced 1 ,!? favour of the Bill.' But he was just as great a sinner hi mself in the way as Mr. Gladstone. The country is sus loneble of alarm, at all events; and such gemches have :lone all that could be done to alarm it. Nothi ore will lost by expli c it ness; th ere i s not hi ng now to be saved by Rile We once hazarded a fabled illustration of the ostrich gait of Sir Robert Peel's policy. But now the ostrich would screen itself by sticking its head in the sand, and, because it Rill not see its way, thinks that nobody else sees its where abouts. STANDARD.—The Times this morning has a warm panegyric upon Mr. Macaulay's speech. At this we cannot \yonder ; the speech was characterised by duplicity and rancour, self-seeking and spite, clothed in coarse and offen sive language. the very qualities by which the Times itse'fis disgracefully distinguished. Mr. Macaulay's position is no doubt a puzzling one ; lie and his party think that by ' voting against the Bill before the House they would 'min the Ministry (we trust that they are mis taken), but they know that they would at the same time dulyUtte destroy themselves. What, then, was Mr. Macaulay t° ? To vote for the Bill, and even to speak for it, but at the sense time to damage the measure in the eyes of all men, by fallacious and un-Christian arguments in its A 7 t; and to throw upon its authors all the dirt that even Practised industry could collect. An article which we ve copied from this day's Morning Herald, fairly !_ve think (by a reference, to facts and dates) dem ons t ra t es the perfect harmony and consistency of Sir Robert Peel's conduct r _lards the Church in Ireland, from the day in which he can p ' e art aid to have been a political leader, whether as head of a y ea Yin opposition, or as head of a government. For fifteen Churchr he has steadily and constantly fought the battles of the against Mr. Macaulay and his faction, and never, 4 - "Lwe firtnly believe, did the Right Hon. Baronet propose ',1:93. measure better calculated to fortify the temporal eats- L ament of the Church, or to accelerate the completion of ofo_ er ed purpose, than the measure now before the House M;:arons. What inconsistency is there here? But, says v sar t p t i se " a nisY, Sir Robert Peel has taken his party by h ; if, however, there be a surprise, it is a surprise R ' twelve months' warning, and a surprise of which Sir e tak n en gi n is, Mr. Colquhoun, Plumptre, or Col. Verner, Ther, .0 complaint. But, then asks Mr. Macaulay, with an Lti nraPh, where is Lord Stanley's Registration Bill ? h„,,,,rePTOach of not i ntroducing the Bill since 1841 must, P ee r b r, be divided with Lord Stanley and Sir Robert vetea every one of the Conservative Members who one of it five years ago. It was as competent for any T r the number to revive the measure, as it was M aui Stanley, or Sir Robert Peel ; for we may remind Mr. re 4u htv that ' it was not introduced as a Government sit:euprreo;but.introduced by a private Member of Parliament. hegi q 'lnh is, however, due to any one in the matter. The Pra ration Bill registtirea,,l wa s a practical remedy for an existing the fraudulent composition of the Irish ° l a ent we years ago. It was the duty of the Parlia fraod4pi revent future Houses of Commons being elected by a od n ently-composed registry, and therefore it was right Lora rssary to introduce such a Bill as was introduced by' Of the -"y in 1840. Ti me h as , h owever, d one t h e wor k a.te nt In to some extent—we believe to a sufficient . ttle mob ,.'? preclude the necessity of legislation upon rect e a -7t- The attention of the people has been no vel ty of the frauds practised with facility in the and .7 of the Lo no R e new constitution given by the Reform Bill, t°wav er, „gl r -,tration Bill seems to be now called for. If, tent t o ": • Macaulay thinks one is necessary, it is as wea l_ int eod „"nn to introduce one now, as it was to Lord Stanley "s s „ e fe one in 1840. Let us take leave of Mr. Macau worth he than acknowledgment that it is in every way com mendation of the Times. RA ILWAY COMMITTEES. (THIS DAY.) tOUT!„ (Co ntinued from our Afternoon Edition.) 810 "AST ERN LINE. —WIDENING AND EXP AN- W 4. OF THE LONDON AND GREENWICH RAIL- J eroe s - : w ere three petitions against this line; one from Mr. S. /1 1.11k; G i t from Mr. Heywood, and one from Mr. Robinson Latten. ''F° RD-ERIDGE AND CHILHAM, WITH FIVE Flo e BRANCHES. Sir Petitions against—f:nu Messr. M. Carr, Robinson Lattn, D1'0 1411 71. Ooldsrnid, and t two from s the owners and occupiers e of Thr ee PA DDOCK WOOD BRANCH -00,t65. 'Petitions against—fro Messrs. J. - "d) and the owners and oc m cupiers of the land.lng eratein, Sir I. kesarc I : I°N DON AND CROYDON BRANCH. Th e 4 Yson and Han reresented tbe petitioners. t having been gone p through, the Committee adjourned. tr - I „TR or TRADE .— Th e market continues ex- Nteth.el ull, and prices, both of goods and yarn, were , t : lower than last week.---RocimALE FLANNEL 13:1-4refr, MONDAY, APRIL 14.—We have had rather ' llB ine's doing in the piece market to day, but no Atidr°‘'.einent in prices. The wool market remains steady, Pliers firin . — Manchester Guardian. _ 'E RIA L PARLIAMENT. (THIS EVENING.) T O USE OF C MMONS. ~ ,- - L e SPR H O ALER took th e Ch a i r at Four o'clock. 4 t7'.ue l3irmingbarn and Staff or d s hi re Gas Bill was read third time and passed. o l tir _C: r. the nio ion - of Mr. WILLIAMS, the Kirwelly ulosure Bill was read a second time. GREENE brought up the report on the London Phan Asylum Bill. ;111 ,aterthe motion of Mr. BROTHERTON, th e Man- Division Stipendary Magistrate Bill was read a t •ird time and passed. - t o ! i h r• R. COLBORNE moved that it be an instruction 11 1 ,7`, e Committee on the Harrogate and Ripon Junction t "waY 3ill that they have power to make provision by -4,3*Parate Bill for the proposed branch railway to Rich red,iwith the bridge and approaches thereto.— C4l the motion of Lord COURTENAY, the Amicable Loeiety Assurance, Bill was read a third time and passed. a The Rardwell and Streadly Road Bill was read a e ond tim e . Nir B .13 ill f4v ou • ALDWIN present e d a etition f Newark ii.'iliw ~r of th e Shef fi eld And Lipncolnshirerom Junction ay. THE MAYNOOTR GRANT. Nv t ° l l C. MANNERS presented a petition from a esleyan Methodist congregation in the county of Lin 'o,ll agairst the grant to Maynooth. ~,4 r . BR presented petitions from the_ Y uli tY of Gloucester, and from the East Riding of 1)„.k, against the proposed grant to Maynooth. ~„"fr. MIJNDAY presented a petition from the county ,i 1 Derby to the same effect. ‘,..ha Colonel WYNDHAM presented a petition fr9m ;vest Suisex, and also a petition from South -Kirk gainst intemperance. tot Lord DALMENY presented a petition against the to AT 1 —.413 n,coth. t o "" ROLLESTON i i sent d Petiti ons from the 1 . a zitiv s of y(. 11 ontiriBd pr on, and s,Rill. veral (*h er p l aces, at the I.k, Parochal Settlarne nt tr Q ' STRICXiLIAND praaented petitions from seve . TIIE SUN, LONDON, WEDNESDAY EVENING, APRIL l6, 1845. ral Indep: ndent congregations, praying the House to pass some Bill the total prohibition of the sale of in toxicating liquors on the Sabbath day ; and also peti tions against the grant to May nooth. Mr. THORNELY presented petitions praying fur some Bill to abolish some of the Jewish disabilities. Petitions against the grant to Maynooth were pre s-nted by Mr. Duncan, from Scotland ; Mr. Kemble, from Walworth ; Mr. Busf,ild, from Bradford ; Mr. Trotter and Lord Pollington, from Yorkshire ; Mr. Christopher, fiom Lindsay. and other places in lincalnshire ; Colonel Sibthorp, from Essex ; Mr. Ha mil on, Lublin ; Mr. Plumptre, from various parts of the country ; and Mr. Spooner, from Birmingham. Lord CLIVE presented a petition from Manchester against the union of the sees of St. Asaph and Bangor, and in favour of the appointment of a Bishop of Manchester. Also petitions to the same effect from various parts of the country. Mr. LAW presented a petition from the bachelors and under graduates of Cambridge, stating their exceed ing regret at the grant which had hitherto been made to the College of Maynooth. The Hon. Gentleman was proceeding to make several observations, when he was interrupt( d by the Speaker as being out of order, but on stating that he was enly condensing the substance of the petition, he was suffered to say that the petitioners im. plored the House not to accede to the grant. POOR-LAW IN IRELAND Lord CLAUDE HAMILTON presented petitions from several places in Ireland, stating the mismanage. ment of the Poor•law Commissioners, their ignorance of their duty, and their errors, in applying to the Court of Queen's Bench for a mandamus for enforcing their au thority, which had been refused. He also presented pe titions against the Educational Board, and from the Wesleyan Society against the Church Education Society. Mr. LABOUCHERE_ presented a petition from the Caledonian Railway Company, complaining of a clause which had been introduced into the Scotch Railway Clauses Consolidation Bill, indemnifying the landholders of that country against any loss of tolls on gates which they might susta n through the course of a railway de stroying a public highway. THE MIDLAND RAILWAYS _AND MR._ BURKE. Sir J. Y. BULLER brought up the report of the Se lect Committee appointed to investigate the matter. Mr. STRUTT complained of a reflection which had teen cast upon a Committee of which he had the honour of being chairman, and to whom was referred the conside ration of the Midland Railways Bill. It had been asserted that the investigations of the Committee had been conducted in a very improper and slovenly manner, inasmuch as in going through this Bill they . did not read the whole of it, but merely glanced over the marginal notes. Now it was hardly fair to state this, because he believed the real duty of the Committee was only to examine the petition of the promoters and the objects for which they proposed to bring in a Bill, and then to ascertain if they had complied with the standing orders of the House. It was then the duty of the promoters, should it be decided that they had complied with the standing orders, to introduce a Bill properly drawn up, and in conformity with the objects set forth in the petition. He did not see, therefore, how any blame could attach to the Committee. The report was then received. THE GRANT TO MAYNOOTH. Mr. GROG AN presented a petition from Dublin against the grant to Maynooth. Similar petitions were presented by Colonel Acton from Wicklow ; by Mr. Stafford O'Brien from places in Northamptonshire ; and by Culond Fox from Bethna green. Mr. PROTFIERO presented a petition from a place, the name of which we could nDt catch, against the grant to Maytooth. Mr. W. PATTEN presented petitions from places in the West Riding of Yorkshire, to the same effect. MAGISTRATES' CLERKS BILL. Mr. CRIPPS presented a petition against several of the provisions of the Magistrates' Clerks Bill. THE MAYNOOTH GRANT, Mr. MORGAN presented five petitions from places in Walls against the grant to Maynooth. Mr. RAIKES CURRIE presented a petition from Northampton against the same grant. MEDICAL BILL. . Lord DUNCAN presented a petition from Bath again! the proposed Medical Bill. MAYNOOTH GRANT. Mr. SHARMAN CRAWFORD presented three pelt tions from places in Derbyshire against the proposed grant to Maynooth. Mr. OWEN STANLEY said that, on Friday, he should ask a question of the Right Hon. Baronet (Sir R. Peel)—whether it was the intention of the Govern ment still to repeal the Act of the 6th and 7th of William IV., and if it wa s necessar y t o o bt a i n th e consent of te Crown for the union of the sees of St. As ph and Bangor ; and, in the event of such consent being requisite, whether the Right Hon. Baronet was prepared to advise the Crown to give such consent? MAYNOOTH. Sir J. HANMER said that on the Maynooth Bill going into Committee, he should move that the second clause, which gave the power of bequests to the College, be omitted. TEMPORAL PEERS OF IRELAND. Mr. FERRAND, seeing the Right Hon. Baronet the Secretary for Ireland in his place, begged to ask, whe ther, at the late election of a temporal Peer of Ireland, one or more Noble Lords did not decline to vote on ac count of the Irish Bequests Act being a contravention of the oath of supremacy ; whether the Crown lawyers were consulted upon the validity of this objection ; and if so, whether he vi ill lay a copy of their opinion on the table of the House? Sir THOMASFREMANTLE had made every inquiry but could not ascertain that any such circumstance had occurred as that to which the Hon. Member had alluded. Mr. JERVIS said that seeing the order for taking into consideration the Justices' Clerks Bill was on the paper, he begged to ask the Right Hon. Baronet, the Secretary for the Home Department, whether it was his intention that it should supersede the adjourned debate, or whether he intended to postpone it? Sir J. GRAHAM said that it was his intention to move that the Bill go into Committee pro forma, but, as it was his intention simply to carry the Bill into Com mittee, he did not intend to make any further motion upon it. Several of the clauses required alteration, and .the Government would therefore be obliged if the House would suffer the Bill to go into Committee, in order that it might be printed, and those alterations receive due consideration. PETITIONS ON MAYNOOTH. Colonel SIBTHORP begged to make the motion of which he had given notice, that there be laid before this House a return of the numbers of petitions that have been presented for and against the present proposal, on the part of her Majesty's Government, of an increased grant out of the Consolidated Fund to the College of Maynooth in Ireland, with the total number of signa tures annexed thereto—the above return to be made up to Friday the 18th day of April. The Right Honourable Gentleman expressed his respect for those who waited upon him, but he thought the Right Hon. Gentleman would show his sense of the respect he entertained for them, by consenting to the proposition so strongly recommended by them, that the number of those mho signed the petitions should be specially printed, in order that they might, as soon as possible, be spread through the country. Mr. ROEBUCK rose to order. He believed the Hon. and Gallant Member was out of order in moving for the number of petitions, with the signatures attached to them, which might be presented up to Friday next. The SPEAKER said that the question before the House was, that the order of the day be now read. Colonel SIBTHORP would bow with profound re spect to the deci,i ,, n of the chair. - Mr. HINDLEY said he wished to present 134 peti tions against the grant to May nooth.—(Order, order.) The SPEAKER said that the Hon. Member was not in order. Neither could the Hon. and Gallant Officer make the motion he sought to make at present. What the Hon. and Gallant Officer sought for would be laid on the table of ttie House in a few days, in the report of the Select Committee on Public Petitions.—(Hear.) MUSEUMS OF ART BILL. Mr. EWAItT would defer his motion on this mea sure until after the May nooth Bill had been disposed of. CALICO PRINT-WORKS BILL. On the motion of Lord ASHLEY, the House went into Committee on this Bill pro formd, and it was for warded a stage.. P.titioni against any further grant to the College of Maynooth were presented by Dr. Bowring, Mr. Packe, Sir John Easthope, air C. Napier, Colonel T. Wood, Mr. Godson, Mr. Caley, Sir G. Clerk, Mr. Craven Berkeley, Mr. Colvile, Mr. Pattison, Sir R. H. Inglis, and Mr. Alderman Humphery. Mr. H[NDLEY presented 130 petitions to the same effect, and similar petitions were presented by Mr. Turner, Mr. Hume, Mr. Fielding, Lord Ashley, and several other Hon. Members. ADJOURNED DEBATE. The order of the day for the adjourned debate was then read, and the Speaker called on Mr. HAMILTON, who said that he must certainly confess that it was with great reluctance, but under an imperative sense of duty, he felt compelled to vote against the measure. Whilst he opposed the measure he thought it right to state that he understood, and highly appre ciated, the motives of the Government in proposing it— namely, their desire to indicate kind feelings towards the Catholics of Ireland, and to conciliate that body by what might be considered a liberal and suitable endowment for their priesthood. No Member in the House felt more strongly than he did how desirable it was that the esteem and regard of the Catholic population of Ireland should be secured to the Government and Legislature of this empire. No Member of the House was more anxious than he was to see all causes of alienation removed, and the two great parties in Ireland holding out the right hand of brother hood and friendship to each other, and he would with that feeling willingly concur in the present motion, if it were not inconsistent with higher obligations. And if he really thought that the measure which was proposed by the Government would have that effect which the Government thought it would have, and if he could reconcile it to his conscience to support this measure, no consideration of consistency, or of the pecu liar position which he held in this House, should induce him to oppose it. He, therefore, felt com pelled to state unreservedly the reasons which compelled him to oppose this measure ; and he felt it the more incumbent on him to do so, because the same reasons had been alluded to by the Hon. and Learned Member for Bath, not for the first time, and had, as he thought, been misunderstood by that Hon and Learned Gentleman ; and because the speech of the Right Honourabl e G ent l eman t h e late President of the Board Pi Tr. 5.4-3 seemed to have been intended to contravene the Na. The Honourable and Learned Gentleman the Member for Bath lieti stated, and that not for the first time, his opinion that States had nothing tO do with religion. The argument of the Right Honourable Gentleman the late Presi dent of the Board of Trade, and it was the first time the Right Honourable Gentleman had used that argument, appeared to him to amount to the same thing, for although he stated that a perfect agree ment in religious opinions between a State and every member of that State would be the consummation of poli tical happiness—a consummation, however, that a e had no right to expect—yet the Right Hon. Gentleman stated, that if such were not the case, that all sects of religion, without rt ference to the truth or falsehood of their doctrines, had equal claims upon the Government. He (Mr. Hamilton) aas not ashamed or afraid to avow that he had always thought that the consideration of the truth of religious doctrines just as much as the considera tion of the truth of morality, or of the doctrines of trade or commerce, was within the scope and responsibility of Government. He considered that it arts the paramount duty of every Christian State to affirm that prin.' ciple by recognising some intelligible principle of religicus belief; and if religion was something true and something tangible, then the holding of certain religious doctrines was essential to the truth. It was the duty of the State certainly to protect and to tolerate every member of the State in the exercise of his eligious opinions, whatever they might be ; but yet it vas a gross inconsistency and a great dere liction from that homage which was due to a truth for a State to support two systems of religion incompatible with and contradictory to each other. It could not be denied that theyrotestant religion is the re ligion of the State, and that as such it was held to be true. The British empire and the British Constitution were an empire and a Constitution which provided against what were considered the errors of the Church of !tome, and if that be so he confessed that he was unable to di cover how it was possible to make it con sistent for that State to countenance and encourage the Roman Catholic or any other religion differing the length of a thumb from the State Church. The Hon. Member for Bath said that the Constitution had nothing at all to du with religion; if that were true they ought to unprotestantise the empire, and to abo lish the coronation oath as beins , unconseientions, and it ought to be competent for the Sovereign to become a Roman Catholic. He would not recognise the distinc tion which had been drawn by the Right Hon. Gentle man the Member for Newark and several other Gentle men in the course of the debate, between the duties that devolved on the Members of the Muse in their collective and individual capacity. It did appear to him (Mr. Hamil - ton) that the same duty precisely which devolved on the State, devolved upon every member of the State who en tertained the same opinions as those held by the State. Gentlemen of the Roman Catholic religion may justly ask their religion to be encouraged and indulged—it would display no inconsistency on their part ; but holding as he did that their tenets were not conformable with God's revealed truth, he should not think he was doing his duty if he were to vote for the encouragement of a religion which he held with the State to be erroneous. The Hon. and Learned Gentleman the Member for Bath argued as if there were some great degree of arrogance and Pharisaical assumption on the part of those who held certain reli gious opinions in their public capacity, and should act on that belief. He (Mr. Hamilton) did not think that their opinions on religion differed in this respect from their opinions on any other subject. The Hon. Member for Bath held himself very strong opinions, and was never very sparing of those who presumed to differ with him. He was a great admirer of truth, both in politics and religion ; and he could sincerely say, that he had sought for truth in both without reference, either to creed or party. It was his firm belief, that the great cause of truth, was much more likely to be advanced by men conscienciously standir;g by their own opinions, either in religion or politics, than by exhibiting a false liberality, which was only calculated to confound truth, for the sake of pleasing certain parties who were allied to error.—(Hear, hear.) The observations he had taken the liberty of making of this subjec made it obvious that he thought the State was calle, upon to encourage and promote the Protestant system of religion in this country; but with respect to the colonies, it appeared to him to be different. Each colony in itself had a separate constitution under separate legislatures, but, at the same time, he must. confess-that he thought it the duty of the State to establish, as far as possible, a branch of the State Church in every one of the .colonies. There were many other conside rativns which compelled him to vote against the measure. He had already stated, that it appeared to him, to be an endowment of Maynooth, and to involve the abdication of Protestantism and the constitution. It in- volved the complete and whole principle of the endow ment of the Roman Catholic priesthood, and that was a serious question, and one with reference to which this House and the country had a fair right to expect—soer statement from her Majesty's Ministry. The House ou!. ht also to consider the effect which this measure must hare upon public opinion in Ireland, with reference to religions matters. The House ought to re collect that at this moment in Ireland a great struggle was going on between two great antagonistic principles, sustained and supported by two rival countries. Now the effect of this measure must necessarily he to throw all the weight of the Legislature and the Government into the Roman Catholic scale, and that, in his opinion, was a matter of serious considera tion. It was a serious thing to consider that, whilst means were denied for the education of the children of members of the Established Church in Ireland, the Government were making provision of the education of the clergy of the Roman Catholic persua sion, and at the time, too, when the great body of these clergymen had declared themselves strong oppo nents of the British connexion, and while some of these clergy were endeavouring to arrest the free progress of religious opinion in Ireland The last objection which he would take the liberty of stating against the proposed nit asure was, that the Le gislature wanted a sufficient control over the system of education and principles which were inculcated in the College of Maynooth. He certainly approached that sub ject with the greatest dislike and reluctance, and he could assure Hon. Members professing the Roman Ca tholic religion that ho had no intention of offending their feelings. Nothing could be more unfair than to impute error to others, who must be supposed to be as justly conscientious in exercising their own judgment, and just as anxious on this subject as he could possibly be ; and he could assure the House that he was far from inheriting that most depressed of all tastes—the taste of criminating the principles of his opponents. But in a question of this kind, he thought it his duty to speak out—he thought the country had a right to know what the principles were, which were inculcated at the College of Maynooth. He was quite ready to admit, that if Parliament in its wisdom should determine to endow the Roman Catholic College of Maynooth, it would be equally unreasonable and unfair to interfere with ths3 religious opinions of the Roman Catholics. The Roman Catholics would justly expect that their religious opinions ought to be respected. But be that that Parliament had a right to know whether their doctrines were right, and whether any political in fluences, social or anti-social, were at work among them. On a former night of the debate his Right Hon. Eriend the Member for the University of Dublin had asserted that certain political influences inimical to the peace of the country were at work in the establishment of Maynooth. A Noble Lord, in replying to the speech of his Right Hon. Friend, had accused him of imputing to the Roman Catholics certain doctrines subversice of the constitution, but what was the statement of his Right Hon. Friend ? It was, that the political doctrines which the Noble Lord said were altogether exploded were at that very moment inculcated and taught within the walls of Maynooth. He was aware that statements had been made to the Right Hon. Baronet at the head of her Majesty's Go vernment, to the effect that the principles and doctrines inculcated at Maynooth were ultra-Montaigne ; if so, then he (Mr. Hamilton) would say they were most ohrectionable and should not be supported by this House, because if they were, as a consequence the ecclesiastical law and principles of the Roman Catholics of Ireland would be dangerous to the best interests of the British Co- stitation. He would ask, why not make inquiry into this subject ? or was it right that the Parliament and the country should be kept in the dark upon it.—(Hear, hear.) Ct uld it be consistent that no inquiry should be had, when in quiry was so much called for, and at a time when the (ioiernment were about to endow a Roman Catholic College, thereby giving their countenance to the doc trines to be taught in that College.—Hear, hear.) He did think this inquiry was called for, and so thought those from whom he had presented petitions. He had that day presented petitions from the Congregation of Harold's Cross, near Dublin, which was very strong, but still respectful, for if it were not, he would not pre sent it. The petitioners stated their objections and their grounds for them. The objections were not to the Roman Catholic religion or the doctrines of Maynooth, but to what was contained in their class-books, and they called for inquiry; and he could only say, if the charges contained in the petition be true, it was his firm belief that no Member of that House, be he Catholic, or be he Protestant, could get up in his place and de fend a measure for the maintenance of an esta blishment where such doctrines were inculcated. He spzealed to those Hon. Gentlemen to take the matter into their own hands. Let them judge for them selves, and if they should find that the allegations which had been made were true, he called on them to have the existing system changed. He called on them to have the objectionable class-hooks removed from Maynooth, and to free the college from the imputa tion of inculcating tenets and doctrines they themselves abjured. He trusted that he had said nothing which could fairly be considered as calculated to wound the feelings of any Honourable Gentleman. He had endeavoured to compress within the least posssible compass the observations which he had to make to the House. He knew that subject had been exhausted, and he felt, therefore, that it was only necessary for him to state the reasons which had actuated him to declare with great reluctance his determination of giving his strenuous opposition to this Bill in all its stages. [When the Hon. Gentleman sat down at least a dozen Members rose to address the House. The Speaker, however, called upon] Mr. ELLICE (Coventry), who said that it was not his intention (contrary to his general usage), to give a silent vote on the present occasion, So much excitement had been got up, and he had received so many petitions from respectable bodies of his constituents against the opinion which he entertained on this subject, that he felt himself com pelled, with much reluctance, to state very shortly the reasons which would induce him without the least liesitatim to give his cordial support to the second reading of this Bill. He might probably thereafter vote with his Hon. Friend the Member for Sheffield on the motion of which he had given notice with respect to the quarter from which all funds should be taken for the advancement of religion and 'religlons vas' in Ir e l an d ; b ut h e (Mr. Ellice) Was prepared pot Eo starer that' if lig should fail with his his Hon. Friend in carrying that proposition into cffect, still he would give his support to the present measure, belii.ving it to be an act of tardy justice, and a partial restitution to the Irish people. (LEFT SPEAKTNC.) litEL AN .1). REPEAL ASSOCIATION. DUBLIN, APRIL 14.—The usual weekly meeting of the As sociation took pla ce t o -d ay i n the Conc i l i at i on H a ll , M r. E. Clements in the ch a i r. Mr. O'Cosis sor , read a letter from Mr. D. Callaghan, M.P., in which h e stated himsel f to be un unflinching re pealer, and promised to join the Association upon his arrival in Dublin. Mr. O'Ccssluia, said, that on a former day he had an nounced that the Cominittee of the Association were consi dering the best method of celebrating the 30th of May, the arinivetsary of the incarceration of himself and his friends, and on that occasion he hail stated his own opinion to be, that a renewal of the Clouted' meeting would be the most satisfactory step that could be taken for that purpose. On reflection, however, he feared, that at a sleeting so near town as Clontarf would be, they might not have the same control over a large number of persons as in the country. In town there were a large number of active persons who differed so widely from them in political opinion that it was possible confusion might be created on such an occasion. He, there fore, thought. that it was best to postpone the meeting at Clontarf to the 16th of September next, the day of their discharge from prison.—(H ear , hear.) The Committee in the mean tune would confer together' and consider the best way of celebrating the 30th of May, because they could not allow that day to pass over without marking it - with white.— (Cheers,) The lion. Gentleman next brought forward and read a report on the Bill for the perpetual endowment of May nooth. The Committee, after giving an abstract of the Bill, stated their opinion to be, that it was framed in a just and conciliatory spirit, and offered no matter of doubt or diffi culty to any Roman Catholic, however suspicious he might have been made by the conduct of the present or any former Government. They also expressed their belief that, circumstancedas the country is with its ecclesiastical and State revenues, originally granted for Roman Catholic purposes, it was no infringement of the voluntary principle to receive by way of restitution the means of educating the Catholic clergy, especially when tendered in so satisfactory and conciliatory a manner. Mr. O'Connell said that he was most anxious to have this Bill universally read and under stood, to enable every Irishman to judge whether it was an enactment which he, as a Catholic, ought to accept, and also whether it contained anything derogatory to civil or re ligious freedom. It appe are d to hm that it contained no thing of the kind. There was to be no interference of Pro testants with education in the College ; and this was exactly what he desired. He conceded to Protestants the right of pursuing their own course of education, and he asked the same permission for Catholics for their children and clergy. —(Hear, hear.) He had been asked why he did not advise that petitions in favour of the Bill should be got up, as it was deemed so good a measure. He was ready with his answer, which was this—that they had not asked for the Bill, it was entirely the voluntary act of the Government.— (Hear, hear.) The Irish people would not stoop to ask for such a trifle.—(Hear, hear.) When millions were owing to them, they would not beg for a penny in the pound.— (Hear, hear.) They had not, therefore, asked for this Bill, but they would cheerfully accept it if it were passed. He repeated that he was very grateful for the Bill, and he had no notion of being stingy of his thanks, as he certainly was not of vituperation of those who deserved censure. The Bill had its use too in another respect—namely, the enabling them to ascertain what the real disposition of the people of England towards this country was.—(Hear, hear.) lie had a species of unpleasant gratification in seeing verified what he had often stated—that the people of England had not the heart in the right place when they came to deal with Ireland.—(Hear, hear.) He was once in the habit of using the term " Saxon," when speaking of the English people, and lie had often accused them of illiberality and bad feeling towards the people of this country, but he was told that it was the Government, and not the people of England, which was adverse to Ireland. He had abandoned the use of the obnoxious phrase, and tried the language of conciliation, but what did they now see? . They saw the Government acting in a friendly manner towards this coun try, and the people of England rising in masses against them.—(Hear.) A friend who had jest returned from Lon don told him he never remembered to have witnessed so much excitement there as at present. "No Popery" pla cards and advertisements were encountered at every turn, and the abuse of Irish Catholics which they contained was read with applause by the groups of p eop l e attracted by them.—(hear, hear.) Yes, the people of England were taking a strong part against this country. Who was not aware, that if they had not been always hostile to Ire land, she could not have been left so long in her present abject condition ; but, proud and bigoted as were their Eng lish neighbours (and they might well be proud of having ' such a people as the Irish for their slaves), they would not continue to be their slaves.—(Loud cheers.) He bad been told that he ought not to accept mo ne y from Eng poses, a n d h a d b een ca ll ed .- denomination of 37 . lle was quite rea d y Chris tiansol n s h t, o P a r p o s sa t 3 e e t tn a g n t se its f p o r r io C nwc a in t p l o em l i o c hfl p iet u ve r er sr. to adopt the principle to the fidlest extent, but he wanted others to do so likewise. The Protestant clergy who opposed the present Bill on the pretext of its being a violation of principle, forgot that they were silent respecting the grant of 9,000/. a year, which they had not opposed, and that they continue silent respecting the Regium &mum of the Presby terians, and the grants to religious cofnmunities in Scotland. Why were not these grants opposed, and why had such an outcry been raised against the grant of a suitable endowment for Mavnooth ? The truth was, they hated them as Irish men, and were bigoted against them as Catholics.—(llear, hear.) The Times spent three years in abusing the Catholic clergy and people, and raised the people of England to such a pitch of exasperation against the Ministry for favouring the Irish people, that they rose at length and turned out the Whigs. It was idle, therefore, to talk of favour to this coun try from England, and he was not sorry for their hate. He would run no race of petitions with them—if necessary, he could have millions of signatures to one. He would ask nothing, but he would take the boon gratefully at - it was given graciously.—(Hear, hear.) The Hon. Gentleman next proceeded to repel the charges recently made against the College of Maynooth, and asserted th a t out o f 15,000 students who since its foundation had been edu cated there, not a single one had been charged with an offence of any kind. He next eulogised the presidents an d professors of the College, and enumerated several distin guished Roman Catholic clergymen who had filled those situations. When there was no stain either on the students or the professors it was too bad that the provision of a suit able maintenance for them should be the signal for an exhi bition of fiendish bigotry on the part of the English people Shame on them for envying Ireland sixpence in the pound of her just debt! The re was their conscience their honour, their honesty I He was glad th at h e hi mse lf had taken the offer in the spirit he had met it with. Of course, if the Catholic clergy had condemned it, or refused it, he would have joined them; but as they had been silent he took it for granted that they approved of it. Had they objected to the Bill, he himself would have moved that it be kicked out of the House; but he was most happy in stating that Sir Robert Peel had consulted the Catholic authorities in the most open and generous manner on the subject. He had been accused of a factious disposition to refuse everything from the present Government, no matter how good the mea sure offered might be ; but lie rejoiced that the present Bill gave them an opportunity of showing what their true spirit was. Ile hoped it would be well received throughout Ire land; but as to its being a bribe to the clergy, he defied those who thought so, and equally so those who believed it would have the effect of making them relax in their efforts to regain natioual independence.—(Loud cheers.) The Hon. Gentle man concluded by moving that the report be adopted and printed for circulation. Mr. T. STEELE add ressed the meeting on t h e same subject. Mr. H. GRAPrAN, M.P., s a id, th a t the people of England had declared war on th e I rish people b y t h e i r con duct in re • ference to the May nooth grant, and he h a d l ear nt a lesson within the last forty-eight hours which he might forg ive but would never forget. He took his leave of the "gentlemen o f England ;" he wished them no ill, but so help hint God lie would never willingly draw a sword in their behalf or give them a %guinea of his money.—(Loud cheers.) They had covered their country, their cause, and their Parliament with a disgrace which they could never remove.—(Cheers.) The motion was then adopted, after a few remarks from Mr. J. O'Connell, M.P. Mr. O'Ccilessna, announced the receipt of 250/. from Bos ton, front Philadelphia 451., and from Illinois 100/. Mr. G. PORTER addressed the meeting at considerable length in support of his pec u liar views, and strongly recom mended the establishment of a national militia in this country. Mr. O'CONNELL agreed with Mr. Potter that a national militia would be ext reme ly advan t a geous, if sanctioned by Parliament and constructed according to constituotinonuallepsrut sub ject of the tenant-right i n Ul s ter, upon which ciples. Hreportchcommented he e then brought forward a long at considerable length. 11d. The rent for the week was stated to be 7001 . 4 s . DUBLIN STOCK AND SHARE MARKET. There was again a great deal of business in the scrip of the new railways, with a decided advance in the Great Southern and Western Extension. The following are the closing prices :— Three per Cent. Consols, 984 ; Three and a-Quarter per Cent. Stock, soil .3 ; Three-and •a-Half per Cent. Debentures, 93a ; Grand Canal Debentures, 4/. sterling Dun per annum, 71 ; Mining Company of Ireland, 13i ; Royal Bank, 144 ; City of Dublin Steam of 1836, 52. Railways: Western, 17i ; Ditto Extensio e t e i ss , ttee l mr l n i : Waterford and Limerick, 64 •, —Great Southern and Dublin Dublin n to t a d ? i d n g ß a e r l Belfast ABetil Junction, ifiaosnte,a n31(0fi;B; Irish GreatGe nr Ballymena , at s l lv V ; Kingstown and Bray, 104 4; Cork D ldva n ie b kx l f i ao n nrdd to aEn G nd a n l ic i s v ka a ri , oein s y: i 444 4; ;4; and Bandon, 6 ; Londonderry and Enniskillen, 4 4. together Coventry( with ths ouef. electors 0 of the Chester,thha vtihnegcrregard UNIVERSITY I NTELLIGENCE. OXFORD, APRIL , 12.—BRASENOSE COLLEGE.—A Fel lowship on the original foundation of this college is now vacant, and will be filled up in the course of the present term. Natives of the ancient diocese of Lichfield and county in f g " g 7 a r a r -- g lin ard in their enee given by the statutes in the wick, except the deaneries of Kineton and Warwick, and to natives of Prescot an-i Prestbury, and the county of Lancaster. duates of the University of_ Oxford under eight years y, the 26th inst., certi ficates t iri a se n ti de instance e ing t e , areeligible; the t together with the in the second to natives of the counties of Lancaster and Chester. Candidates are required to exhibit to the ti P ( r m in te e e ip e ti f l, the n usuEl college testimonials , and the certificates of their matriculation. TRINITY COLLEGE ELECTION.--There will be an else joereeibietyfor:fStahteuirrdabirth, tion of two scholars on Monday, May 19th. Candidates must be above 16 and under 20 years of age ; and will be required to present, in person, to the President, certi ficates of baptis and testimonials of con d uct, together with a Latin epi m stle to request permission to offer them selves, at nine o'clock on Wednesday morning, May 14th, when the examination will be g i n. EXETER COLLEGE.—There will be an election to a Scholarship in this College on Friday, May 9, open to all persons above the age of 16, and who (if members of the University) have not exceeded two years from their matriculation. Candidates are required to call on the Rector, with the necessary certificates, on or before Saturday, Mai . 3 . QUEEN's COLLEGE.--An election of an exhibitioner on the Michel Foundation at Queen's College will take place on Thursday, the 23d day of May next. Candi dates must be natives of the province of Canterbury, who have attained the full age of fifteen, and have not ex ceeded the age of twenty years ; and if members of the University, must not have been matriculated longer than twelve calendar months. Certificates of baptism and testi monials of good conduct must be delivered to the Pr3vost of the said college by the respective candidates : -, n or before Saturday, - the - 7th of Atay:' Ttie'' examination will commence on Monday, the 9th, at ten o'clock in the morning. REGULATIONS OF LODGING-HOITSES. The keeper of .a lodging-house is expected to make the following engagement to the head or other officer of the college, or hall, before any junior member of the same be permitted to occupy his lodgings :- 1. I will lock the dour of my house at ten o'clock at night, end note down the hour after ten o'clock at which any junior member of the University lodging in my house shall enter or leave his lodgings. 2. I will deliver or send a list every morning to the porter of the college or hall to which any such lodger in my house belongs, in time to be by him inserted in his gate-bill. 3. I will repzrt at the same time to the Dean or some other officer of the college or hall if any such lodger in my house shall pass the night out of his lodgings. 4. I will not allow on any account a key of an outer door of my house to any such member of the University lodging therein. fwill not supply or receive into my house, except from his own college or hall, a dinner or supper for any such lodger, without a written permission from some officer of his college or hall. The Vinerian Professor of Common Law will com mence a course of lectures on the common law of Eng- land on Tuesday tl.e 22d instant, at 12 o'clock, in the Vinerian school. The Aldrichian Professor of Medicine proposes to commence his next course on the practice of physic on Wednesday, the 16th inst. Students of medicine de• sirous of attending the course are requested to call upon the Professor, at his residence, on or before Tuesday, the 15th inst. PREFERMENTS. Baker, Rev. Thomas Fielding, 8.A., to the rectory of Little Cressingham, Norfolk. Barton, Rev. Thomas, to the rectory of St. Anne's, Sutton Bonnington, Nottinghamshire; also the pert et nal curacy of liing,ton-upon-Soar. Boyce, William, T , :sq., 8.A., has been appointed one of the masters of the college at Cheltenham. Bryan, Guy, M.A., has been appointed chaplain to her Majesty's ship Melampus. Carroll, Rev. C. It., to the curacy of Folkestone. Forge, Rev. Christopher, for upwards of twenty• five years curate in that parish, to the incumbency of Goxhill. Ilavergall, Rev. W. IL, M.A., rector of St. Nicholas, Worcester, has been appointed an honorary canon in the cathedral of that city. The Lord Bishop of' St. David's has appointed his chaplain, the Rev. Mr. Melvillr, to the canonry in St. David's Cathedral, vacant by the death of the Rev. Dr. Hewson, Swansea. Sheepshanks, Rev. T., 8.A., to the incumbency of Christ Church, High Harrowgate. Spencer, Rev. Woolley, late rector of St. Michael's, Stamford, to the confratership of Brown's Hospital, in that town. Stevenson, Rev. H. J., M.A., to the vicarage of Grim ley-cum-Hallow, Worcestershire. Sympson, Rev. C. J., M.A., to the rectory of Kirkby Misperton, Yorkshire. Temple, Rev. W., 8.A., to the rectory of St. Alphege with St. Mary North vicarage, Canterbury. CAMBRIDGE, SATURDAY, APRIL 12. MAGDALENE COLLEGE. The Hon. Francis Seymour Grimstone, who took an honorary M.A. degree at the last congregation, is fifth son of the Earl of Verulam ; and the Hon. Charles Cornwallis Neville, who took a similar degree, is second son of Lord Bray Brooke. KING'S COLLEGE. Mr. Day, K.S., Captain of the Collegers, Eton, is the new scholar. ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE. The Rev. Charles Easther, 8.A., Head-Master o Kirkby Ravensworth Grammar •school, has been electec Head-Master of the Grammar-school, Beverley, York• shire. THE CHURCH. The following appointments have just taken place:— The Rev. Henry Thomas Murdock Kirby, 8.A., of St. John's College, to the vicarage of Mayfield. Sussex. The Rev. John 'Jayne, M.A., of Trinity College, to the vicarage of Ruddington, Somerset. GREAT RAILWAY DEVELOP MENT. SHROPSHIRE, CHESIIIIIE, IRELAND, BIRKEN HEAD, &c. &c. TO THE EDITOR OF TIIE SUN. SlR,—Amidst all the great schemes afloat for the im provement of railway communication throughout the country, the public attention appears to have rather overlooked the vast changes which are going on in the important tract of country having Chester for its centre. A new and powerful community is establishing itself on the western shores of the river Mersey, whose rising city " Birkenhead" is at once the wonder of the age and the nucleus of a commercial revolution which has no parallel even amongst the enterprising people of the United States. Birkenhead now comprises more popu lation, more wealth, and more elements of grandeur, than racist of our oldest and most favoured cities. With all the advantages of Liverpool, as regards the commerce of the world, it also possesses the same communication with Manchester and Yorkshire, and a better commu nication with Birmingham and all the south, being about 10 to 15 miles nearer, as far as land carriage is concerned. This rising community of giants will soon possess the most spacious docks in the kingdom, and it is idle to doubt their success—the very constitution of the company "ensures" success! Low charges, great accommodation and facility, and an ultimate emancipa tion of all charges whatever, will and must eomraand an immense trade as long as the river Mersey bears on her waters the commercial navies of the world! This, then, is the keystone of the vast structure of traffic to which your attention is called. This new port, and these new docks of Birkenhead will ere long possess some of the elements of the Liverpool greatness. The communica tion by the river is safer and more convenient than on the Liverpool side, as it is sheltered from the westerly gales, and possesses the best anchorages. An influential body of Manchester manufacturers is interested in the success of the scheme, and will transfer much of their business thither, to escape the great expens es of cartage, porterage, dock dues, and the exorbitant charges for tire insurances now prevalent in Liverpool. Not that the commerce of Liverpool is likely to be much affected by such transfer, since the accumulating trade of the Mersey is becoming more and more developed, and the greater the facilities offered on its shores, no matter whether on the eastern or western, must tend to the in crease and permanence of that flourishing commerce. From Birkenhead there is a railway to Chester, and the merchandise and passengers brought by the vessels and steamers which will find accommodation in the docks will be conveyed by rail through a tunnel to the main line, without delay or expense, which is quite a new and a most promising feature, whether as affecting the pros perity of the docks or the railways concerned. Eight miles from Birkenhead (at Hooton) the Manchester railway will diverge from the Chester and Birkenhead line, and a little further on (at Sutton) it is probable that a short line will ere long be projected to Queen's Ferry for the Welsh traffic. At Chester this important little trunk joins a collection of other railways which are destined in a few years to be the tributaries to it, and the natural channels for the great flow of traffic which this combination of facilities will create. On the west is the great Holyhead line, which under the foster ing patronage of Government will have a large convey. ance of troops, mails, passengers, &c., besides the pro bable accession of summer traffic by parties visiting the beauties of Wales or the sea coast. Next to the Holy head line, though not inferior in importance, is the No r th Wales Mineral R a il wa y, w hi c h f alls into Ate former at a mile or two from Chester, and will bring on the Bir kenhead line an immense quantity of coals, minerals, &c., the value of which is almost incalculable. In coal alone it is computed that an export trade will be rea lized, sufficient to pay a fair dividend on the different railways concerned. The next important railway bear ing on Chester is the projected Shrewsbury, Oswestry, and Cheshire Junction, one of the most promising little lines in the kingdom. Its cost will be extremely small, and taking its rise at Shrewsbury with a branch at Os westry, it will join the Mineral Railway at or near Wrexham, and thus bring the districts south of Shrews bury into direct communication with Chester. The next line at Chester is the Chester and Crewe, a braneh of the Grand Junction falling into the main trunk at Crewe. This line, however, is of secondary importance, it having hitherto been kept virtually closed by the con servative policy of the Grand Junction Company, whose desire has been to prevent any traffic leaving their main line on the Lancashire side to swell the receipts of the Cheshire Railways. It is said also that their policy has been to depreciate the Birkenhead Railway as much as possible, in order to acquire it on easy terms, but by a mere fortuitous circumstance this object has been de feated. Another line projected at Chester, is the Chester and Preston Brook, which is only in embryo, but bears a high premium in the market. Thus the converging of so many railways at Chester bids fair to make that city the keystone of the traffic with Ireland, North Wales, Birkenhead, Birmingham, &c., and from the great saving of distance, the cheapness of the lines, and the great natural advantages of the country, there can be no doubt that it will tend materially to the public advantage. Another similar knot of railways will, ere long, pro bably, converge at Shrewsbury, a town admirably situ ated for " through" traffic. The line already mentioned (the Shrewsbury, Oswestry, and Cheshire Junction) con nects that town with the North Wales Mineral Railway, from which it will receive supplies of coal, Ike., for the South, and by its means will bring the Birkenhead, North Wales, and Irish traffic, in: a straight line to Shrewsbury. From thence, a railway, already pro jected, and approved by the Board of Trade, will con tinue this important line of communication to Dudley, Wolverhampton, and Birmingham. Thus a direct . and cheap communication will be formed between Birming ham and Liverpool, via Shrewsbury, Chester, and Bir kenhead, the value of which can only be estimated by regarding the value cf the Grand Junction Railway. Another line from Shrewsbury is projected by the Grand Junction Company, but as it offers no public advan tages, and is evidently dictated by the spirit of Conser vatism, to preserve traffic which is seeking a more di rect and advantageous route, it is not likely to be per severed in, and is discountenan c ed by the Board of Trade. Other lines, however, will hereafter, no doubt, be made south of Shrewsbury, to connect the important an thus traffic from Coalbrookdale, Shi ff nell, Bridgnorth, Kid derminster, &c., with Ireland and Liverpool, the districts which surround Shrewsbury and Chest er will probably, ere long,. acquire all the importance er i development which their position and natural advantaarenc f i eae - ,-ro . in 'pie s are capable of. There . is, perhaps, p l c ) present aspect . of ra;lwry 4 111.410 dl 'slick' par ' a i mount portir t cP Ibis one. A new state of things dawning bn these districts, and a very few years will elapse, s pro bably, before these vast schemes and expectatios are realised, in the creation of a new and lucrative traffic which will tend to enrich those parts of the country, be sides adding to the national wealth, as well as the public convenience. I am yours, respectfully, RACING AT WALwonTu.—Monday a very large concourse of persons assembled at the Beehive-grounds, Wal , worth, to witness the foot-racing for the silver cup. The following well-known runners contended :---John Smith (the London Pet), Seaward, Patterson, and E. Smith, of London, Handley, and M a k p i ece. Th e distance contested was a quarter of a mile, and twelve hurdles, placed equi-distant, were leaped in the course of the race, when, after a splendid race, J. Smith came in first and E. Smith second. In betting John Smith was the favourite. The cup was valued at 30/. The long-talked-of match between Seaward, the celebrated pedestrian, and a horse belonging to Jem Burn, was decided, the contesting distance was 440 yards, and to leap twelve hurdles 4 feet 6 inches high. The stakes were 25/. aside. At the start Seaward took the lead, and cleared the hurdles very admirably, closely pursued by his quadruped opponent, when, after a strenuously contested race, Seaward came in the winner. FOOT-RACE AT WINDSOR.—A foot-race, for 101. aside, came off yesterday afternoon, in the New-road, Windsor, between a celebrated runner, named Morton, of the Royal Horse Guards (Blue) and " Young Pridie," of provincial fame, an inhabitant of the town. The distance, 200 yards, was performed in twenty-two seconds by Morton, who beat his opponent by only three yards. HER MAJESTY'S STAG llouNDs.—The celebrated deer Young Richmond afforded an excellent run on Monday. The meet, at which a large field, including Lord St effield, Sir J. Burt, and several officers from Windsor, were present, taking place at the Kennel, at Ascot. The stag, upon being uncalled at No.man's.hcath, between two and three miles from the kennel, took away toward Warfield School:where it doubled to the tight to NVinkfield, through Bl a n e ' s park .to Fyfield, and thence to the right, in the direction of New Lodge, where it made for the forest. The stag then took towards Oakley - green, up to the man. sion at St Leonard's, crossing Clewer.green and the gravel.pits, to Clarence. crescent, Windsor, and thence along the New-road, into the town, where It leaped the high wall, surrounding the site of the old Royal Mews, in Sheet.street, and was taken in Sdring-gardens, where it had taken refuge in a cottage, close to the Bachelor's. acre, after a run of nearly two hours. The country was in beatiful order from the recent rains. The last meet of the royal stag hounds this season will take place nn Ftiday next, at Knapp.hill. PAST TRAVELLING.—As an instance of the extraor • dinary facility of communication between this town and the metropolis, we have authority for stating that yesterday (Friday) a gentleman left London by the Great Western at half-past nine, P.m , stopped ten minutes at Exeter, and reached Devonport, by the Tally-ho, at five minutes past seven, A.M. ; thus performing the entire distance in little more than nine hours !—Denonport Independent. DANGER OF CHILDREN'S CHAISES.—OH Monday a woman, named Williams, was drawing an infant son of Mr. Jones, the landlord of the Harrow public.house, Kingston, who was only ten months old, in a child's chaise, along the Fairdeld.lane, Kingston, when, to get out of the way of a cart, which was coming up the road, she drew the chaise up the orchard bank, but in doing so upset it, and pitched the infant out into the road, when, in an instant, the wheelof the cart passod over the poor infant's neck, momentarily depriving it of life. The young man who drove the cart was not considered blameable. COURT CIRCULAR. Sir Robert Peel had an audience of the Queen yesterday at Buckingham Palace. His Royal Highness Prince Albert, attended by Colonel Bouverle, Equerry in Waiting, honoured the Water Colour Exhibition in Pall Mall East with a visit yesterday. Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Kent visited the Queen yesterday, and remained to lunch with her Majesty and Prince Albert. The Duchess of Gloucester was better yeAterday. His Royal Highness Prince Albert, attended by Colonel Bouve rie, visited her Royal Highness at Gloucester House. The Members of the Royal Family sent to learn the state of the Royal Duchess. Their Royal Highnesses the Duchess of Cambridge and the Hereditary Grand Duchess of Mecklenburgh Strelitz visited her Majesty the Queen Dowager yesterday, at Marl borough House. Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Kent, attended by Lady Anna Maria Dawson and Col. Sir George Couper, honoured the Italian Opera with her presence yesterday evening. The Duke of Cambridge and the Hereditary Grand Duke of Mecklenburgh Strelitz also honoured the perform ance of the opera with their presence. His Serene Highness Prince Edward of Saxe Weimar visited the Grand Duchess Stephanie of Baden yesterday, at the Duke of Hamilton's residence in Portman-square. The Grand Duchess paid visits yesterday to their Royal High. nesses the Duchess of Kent, at Clarence House, St. James's, and the Duchess of Cambridge, at Cambridge House. The French Ambassador and the Austrian Ambassador paid their respects yesterday to the Grand Duchess Stephanie of Baden. Her Royal Highness the Grand Duchess Stephanie of Baden, attended by Baroness de Strundeder and Baron Roth de Schreckenstein, honoured the Italian Opera with her presence last evening. Mr. Parker and a deputation had an interview with the Earl of Dalhousie yesterday, at the office of the Board of Trade. Mr. Mayers, agent for Barbadoes, had an interview with Lord Stanley yesterday at the Colonial-office. The Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England had a meet ing yesterday afternoon, at the office in Whitehall-place. There were present the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bi Shops of London, Winchester, Bangor, Chester, St. David's, Ely, Hereford, Lichfield, Llandaff, Ripon, Roches ter, Salisbury, and Worcester ; the L er d P res id en t o f t h e Council, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Earl of ,Devon, the Earl of Besbor oug h, th e E ar l of ichester, Lord Ashley, the Right Hon. Sir George Grey, and the Right Hon. John Nicholl. The Lord Advocate of Scotland had an interview with the Earl of Dalhousie yesterday. Dispatches from the Governor of South Australia were re ceived yesterday at the Colonial-office. PARLIAMENTARY BUSINESS. TUESDAY, APRIL 15. The following Bills were referred to the Select Committee on Petitions for Private Bills : London and Brighton Railway (Ilorsham Branch). Whitehayen and Furness Junction Railway. The following Bills were referred to the Select Committee on Standing Orders : Eastern Union and Norwich Railway (No. 2). Surrey Iron Railway Company Dissolving. Manchester, Sheffield, and Midland Junction Railway Bill, —Read a second time, and committed, and referred to the Committee of Selection. North Wales Railway,—Report from Select Committee on Standing Orders read :—Bill ordered to be brought in by Mr. William Ormsby Gore and Colonel Pennant. Epsom and Dorking Railway,—Petition for Bill reported, and Bill ordered to be brought in by Mr. Kemble and Mr. William Joseph Denison. Standing Orders Committee,—Resolutions reported ; 1. " That, in the case of the Norfolk Estuary petition for leave to present a petition for a Bill, the Sessional O r d er ought not to be dispensed with. 2. " That, in the case of the Lady's Island and Tacumshin Embankment petition, the Standing Orders ought to be dis pensed with :—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill." 3. " That, in the case of the London and Worcester and South Staffordshire Railway (Dudley and Sedgley Branch) petition, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with : That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill." 4. "That, in the case of the Birkenhead, Manchester, and Cheshire Junction Railway petition, the Standing Orders ought not to be dispensed with. 5. " That, in the case of the London and Birmingham Railway petition, the Standing Orders ought not to be dis pensed with. Second and Third Resolutions agreed to.—Report to lie on the table. NOTICES GIVEN AT THE PRIVATE BILL OFFICE. Direct Northern Railway (No. 1 ),—Committee on petition, postponed from Thursday 17th till Monday, April 21. Birmingham and Gloucester Railway (Wolverhampton Line),—Committee on petition, adjourned till Thursday, April 17. Birmingham and Gloucester Railway (Worcester Devia tion),—Committee on petition, adjourned till Thursday, April 17. Birmingham and Gloucester Railway (Gloucester Exten sion), — Committ e e on petition, adj ourne d till Th urs d ay, April 17. Birmingham and Gloucester Railway (Worcester Branch), —Committee on petition, adjourned till Thursday, April 17. Direct Northern Railway (No. 2) (Lincoln to York), — Committee on petition, adjourned till Thursday, April 17. Shrewsbury Grand Junction Railway,—Committee on petition, adjourned till Thursday, April 17. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS, April 15. RAILWAYS. Lord BROUGHAM begged to call the attention of their Lordships to the motion for an addition to the standing orders in railways, of which he had given notice yesterday. He thought that it was requisite to bring this subject before their Lordships, in order to show the extent of mischief which had been occa sioned by the immense mass of private legis lation on the subject of railways. It was necessary, because such had been the extent of that legis lation, that it interfered not only with the ertioy ment, but even with the possession of property, an d at last the speculation had come to what he must ca a i gambling frenzy, not unprecedented certa i nly err i o, nor unknown the experience of this country some twenty years unknown in the economical history of ane this ghbouring nation. Perhaps it would be better to introduce sub ject by presenting the petition o f a certain of Noble Lady, Lady Cicely Pane, the daughter family estate by inheritance.. Th e petitio n Westmoreland, who had come into theposseswsiaosnwotfita. not by a man o f business, ten by herself; and and therefore he trusted their . Lordships wou ld excuse whatever informality it might contain. Tthe and h com e p a p n e y ti ti c o a n i e led r w u -e p n o t n ohne heron to that 26th t o h f e j a a g n e u n a t ryo, f showed her the plans and specifications, from which, he said, no deviation could be made. She expressed a great dislike to the vicinity of the railroad, and ex pressed a hope that the line would b e d re consolation or b sal u t n e eocr r o e pu in froldo o rm v g e tieh t s l teev, t v,l o .oa,a.s a i greater distance peanndy f r a o lvvl m tohu l el i their Bill. H e a l so held i t n esh h he is hand a p e ti t i on i sv ti h on n s o g w t hihvaeetnn they h g c e o o r t m ; afrionmuraseporyomraenr poefrsyone.oviil,t inwassotnsh e e r s p e e t t , stated tJohn that Clark he s h o a n d , no other means of living but by following that occupation. He stated that for one acre of land which he he held he paid 500/., and since he purchased it he had I • laid out considerable sums of money in improving it. A railway was going to pass through this land, and he was threatened by the company that if he opposed them he would certainly not be so well treated as those who supported it. These two petiti • • oners, therefore, threw themselves upon the protection of their Lordships, and he ( Lord Brougham) trusted that ample protection would be afforded them. The subject of railways was no longer one of a local or limited importance, but altogether of a public, general and national character ' but he neither blam e d th e present nor the past Government for not having foreseen this result, because it had arisen gradually. No Government could, therefore, be blamed for not having foreseen the great national aspect rail ways would ;nom ; but now that the aspect was plain, it was the bounden duty of Government and of Parliament to take the railways under their own control, and treat them as a national concern. They had been so treated in France, and they ought, in his opinion, to he se treated here. He was no enemy to the passing of a railway Bill, any more than he was tq the passing of any general Bill for constructing a canal or high road, the most common Bill of the lot that interfered with the rights of private property, but when they were legislating by wholesale instead of passing one or two small Bills, be did intreat their Lordships to reflect for one moment upon the risk they run of doing most grievous injustice to the rights of pri vate:individuals. The law of England would not allow any land, no matter how small it was, to be taken without the pre.. vious sanction of the owner had been obtained ; nay, so j alters was the law, that if a man put his hand across the fence of an other, he was in law a trespasser, and would be liable to an action for damages. As a general principle for the guider ce of the Legislature, he (Lord Brougham) thought it would be much better that the railway company should be put to inconvenience, rather than the rights of private property should be violated. It would be much better to leave railway companies to make their bargains with the owners and occupiers of land, than put the latter to the expense or trouble of going before a jury or a magistrate to obtain their rights. The companies were in the habit of forcing on their Bills, lest they should lose the completion of them before the end of the session; but he would rather that railways were de layed one, or even two years, than that they should - be hurried forward in this tyrannical manner to their completion. They were told that if there was any danger to be appre hended, that there was a double guard thrown around the interests of individuals in the proceedings of this House, and especially by the scrutiny Of the Com mittee of Standing Orders. But with respect to the Committee of Standing Orders he would warn the House not to depend too much upon them. He did not wish to speak otherwise than with respect of that Committee, but when in the consideration of railway Bills they were told that thoee Bills had been referred to a Committee to ascertain whether the standing orders had been complied with, he would warn them not to think that that Committee was gi'ted with a per fection of apprehension—he would warn them not to think that that Committee was gifted with an untiring industry, that they were in the habit of exhibiting an extraordinary diii gence—he would warn them not to suppose that their dili gence was of that perfect and scrutinising character which would enable them to make themselves acquainted with every part, parcel, and portion of every measure brought before them —he would warn them not to suppose that that Committee was even superficially acquainted with every measure submitted to their consideration—nay, he would warn them against sup posing that th e y k new anything at all about it. No ; tho se gentlemen were too fully occupie d to read even the text Of the measures submitted to them, let alone the consideration. They contented themselves with consulting the margin of the Bill. Now, the margin of the Bill was no part of it, and a railway company or a railway a g ent had nothi ng t o d o b ut to put a clause into the Bill whi c h was omitted in the margin and they might pass a grievous and onerous injustice, without any one being aware of the injury until it came into operation. This wasno speculative philosophy, the fact had act ually occurred, a clause had.been introduced into a Bill which had passed the Committee of Standing Orders. This clause gave to every person having land which contained coal, lime, gravel, or soil, power to carry it across any person's land, by only paying for the damage done and without giving a farthing for the good will ; and this, too, to no less an extent than five miles on each side of the railway. Now, this was an enormous mischief, and a mischief which ought not only to be remedied, but to be prevented. There were two very great evils of which he com plained. One was the power given of deviating from the line chalked out to the extent of a hundred yards on either side of the line, that is a deviation of not less than two hundred yards. Now, why should not the company be restrained to their line itself? Why did they not come to that House so prepared with their line, that there should be no deviation at all, and thus prevent the grievous injury that might arise, as was the case with this petitioner? For his own part, he would rather restrict the companies to twenty yards, than to a hundred on each side of the line, and then if any accident did occur, so that they were obliged to trespass, let them go and make a fair bargain for the purchase of the ground to be taken. Let them go as they did into the market for any other property, and let the seller have a word as to the price as well as the buyer. Let the sale of the property be a voluntary act, and let the owner not be left to the mercy of a jury. They all knew what juries were, and how entirely railway companies had them at their command. Another of the evils was that of the injury done to property by a railway passing near it. If a railway did not pass over the ground, but only near it, there was no com pensation whatever. There was a case which he knew of very great hardship. Ile had gone with a friend to look over a beautiful villa, which had, until the forma tion of a railway near it, commanded a rent of from 300/. to 400/. a year, but which had not now been let for three or four years ; but in consequence of the villa standing en the verge of the property, th oug h th e h ouse was entirely dstroyed by the contiguity of the railway, there was no compensation. Another thing for which provision ought to be made was the height of the works above the ground, for a house might effectually be destroyed ; and he had therefore inserted in the orders which he had devised, and which he begged to lay upon the table, that on the introduction of all future Bills there should be a return of all the houses within three hundred yards of both sides of the railway. He was anxious to add these to the other standing orders, and he should not regret if they had the effect of throwing any impediment in the way of this frenzy of speculation. He felt it was his duty, as it was the duty of every one who had the advantage of addressing that •r the other House of Parlia men, and, through them, the public, that above all it was the duty of that powerful an d i n fl uen ti a l body who were connected with the newspaper press of the country, to ware their fel low-citizens against this frenzy of speculation. How many were there who, after saving a few hundreds or a few thousand pounds by perhaps the industry of half a life, or by the restric tion of penurious habits, had lost their all by investing it in those speculations, with the hope of deriving a larger interest than from any other source. If they referred to 1837, or 1833, and still more, if they went back ten years beyond that time, they would find that 10, 15, or 20 per cent. was a rate of mo de.-ate expectation; and if they attempted to caution any one of those speculators against indulging the hope of such an in terest, they would have only a deaf ear turned to them, or be derided with a smile of contempt. But that was the fact. He would take only one set of railways, and those were all what were called paying ones. In those the original cost of the sha res was 32 , 0 00,000/, ; but he beleved - that by premiums the money which had really been paid for them was 42,000,0001. But taking it at 32,000,0001„ and what was the per centage realised upon them? Not 20, not It,, not 10, nor anything like it, but 51 per cent. was all the interest the holders of the very host kind of railway property had realised, notwithstanding all the risk they ran—less than could be obtained by going to any respectable bill broker. But if lie divided this sum of 32,000,0001. into halves, he found that on 8,000,000/., the interest realised was not 5 per cent., and upon 6,500,00 t 1. the interest was absolutely under 3 per cent. or less than could be obtained from the soundest and best of all securities—the Three per Cent. Consoli dated Annuities. But he did not stop there. Take an other portion of 2,000,000 e and he found that upon that amount, or nearly one-eighth of the whole, the interest w as under 2 per cent. p er annum, and on part f this the whole people obtained was only after the rate of I/. 14s. 6d. per cent. per annum. This was a ll aut h entic information derived from data furnished by the report of the Railway Committees to tho House of Commons. But. even this might have been borne with, if the property had retained its value ; but even that was denied to the unfortunate holder of railway shar e ., far he found that. on twenty-five a n d a h a lf m il lions there had ' been a decided dead loss of fifty per cent. on one-half of the whole amount, so that he who might have secured 30/. a year without risk, could hardly now obtain 12/. for every 1,000/, which he invested; and the property itself, beside all 2 onsideration of premiums, would not sell fir half of what it cost. He would apologise for thus trespassing on their attention, but he felt it his duty to warn their Lordships, and to warn the country against this gambling frenzy, and with this feeling he begged to lay the orders on the table. The Marquis of BREADALI3ANE, in presenting a petition from the Caledonian Railway Company against the 26th clause of the Railway Clauses Consolidation Bill, which gave a par ticular compensation to the trustees of railway trusts, took occasion to deprecate the hostility of the Noble Lord against all railway schemes. Lord BROUGHAM said that he was not surprised at the Noble Marquis's tenderness for railways, seeing that he him self was a Chairman of a Company. Lord DALHOUSIE did not mean, in rising, now to go into a subject of which his Noble Friend had given notice of a motion. He thought it only necessary now to say that he thought some of the statements of his Noble Friend were overcharged. He would reserve what lie had to say upon it until the question of the Bill itself came before the House. The Marquis of B REA DALBA NE moved that the petition be_printed.—O r d ere d. The Export Customs Duties Bill then passed through Com mittee, was reported, and ordered to be read a third time on Thursday. The Glass Duties Bill also passed through Committee, was reported, and ordered to be read a third time on Thursday. The report upon the Lands Clauses Consolidation Bill was then brought up. On the question of the report being received, Lord DALHOUSIE moved amendments on the clauses re lating to arbitrators, which were agreed to without discussion. The report was then received. The report upon the Lands Clauses Consolidation (Scotland) Bill was re-committed. The remaining clauses were agreed to, and the lione re sumed. The CHAIRMAN reported progress, stud the report way or, dered t •be brought up on Thursday. Their Lordships then adjourned, HOUSE OF COMMONS. April 15. I M PEACH MEN'.V 01 , ' SLR R. PEEL. Lord J. RUSSELL R.id he understood the Hon. Gentle man who last spoke to say, that he intended to found a motion on the petition accusing the first Minister of the Crown, of high treason, and calling on the House to impeach him.--( Hear, hear.) Now he k Lord J. Russell) could not agree with the Right Hon. Baronet opposite (Sir R. Inglis) that it was a matter of course, according to the rules of the House, to prime every petition upon which an /ion. Member undertook to found a motion. It was a matter of course upon all ordinary- J the e Graham ) Printing naturally ea. occasions. But the present was a peculiar case. The peti tioners made the heaviest allegations against the v e o ry f t h d e petition or. rsonat Minister of the Crown, and asked for impeachment , row the i ß w i e g s h se t d ll a on v;is G h e n n o tl t em to an o ( p S po ir se that ground. He (Lord J. Russell) could ' feelings of the Right Hon. Gentleman. For hi petition the that the House, even if it were intended mse ' he thought to found on thii petition a motion directly impeaching the conduct of the first. Itlinister of the Crown, ough t o the printing of this petiti - _(2l pause before they consented to on. But he did not think that when the motion was to be made on the third read i ng , that motion alluded, partly indeed, to the __ . and that when , , Bill, but, for the most part, to an Act of Parliament passed last se sion—passeel by the consent of the Queen , L ords, -1 and Comroons, and stated that Act of Parliament v was a violation of the Act of Settlement and of the Act of Supremac , be could not consitler that that could be considered Y as 4 motion impeaching the first Minister of the Crown and would say th a t th e pr i nting that petition, alth oug h h it did not positively say that, in the opinion of the House, there were grounds for impeaching the P'rime Minister, yet it did imply that there was something reasonable in the allegations, or, at least, that they were not-altogether frivolous and absurd allegations.—( Hear, hear.) Now, the allegation s of this pe.. titien might be divided into two parts. One part, as had been observed by the Right Hon. Member for Montgomeryshire, the other evening, directed to the conduct, of the Right Hon. Gentleman the Member for Tamworth, as a Member of that House with regard to motions made by him, Bills brought in, and votes given by him, as a Member of that House.—( Hear. hear.) That could form no ground for proceedings on the part of the House. Another set of allegations accused him of advising the Crr,wn, in his capacity of Privy Counsellor, to fulfil the ortivisions of the Catholic Bequests Act, and to place certain Roman Catholic prelates on the Catholic Brinesta Board, giving them precedence according to the prottsions of the published order in council, and it stated that the appoint ment of these Members to that Board was a violation of the oath of supremacy, and a violation of tire Act of Supremacy itself —( Hear.) Now, it appeared to him (Lord John Russell) that this was a frivolous allegation.. It was not a plausible allegation. They could not take any proceedinn- Olson it, and on that ground alon e , even if it had been inte nded to found a motion upon it, he could not coot. sent so far to give the sanction of the House to those allega tions as to allow the petition to be printed.—(Cheers.) But as the lion. Gentleman said that he should only bring f rwara a motion on t he t hir d reading of the Bill, to the effect th a t the Act of Settlement and the Act of Supremacy had beers violated by an Act passed by Parliament in the last session—. that Parliament having a right to alter or amend any proctschus ing of Parliament—and did not intend to ask the house tetaksh tato its consideration the crimes and misdemeanours of '4,41 ......... kt ie one z, and , a rds of parist of the The ounted :e, has be de. serv ice ;he BP' acel depot- Ito al' on the atre ' t inspect le, the ' 1) 04 r, w b ` i p a isii iitanc e , e diate Y3+ the 4 from ho re ,ixteea aye d e ' cted to ;Ice has ou rt et Withi n w hich groun d ,e. cafe ° C Friday tepneY , heriff ° r of l'i' cter 35 'attisori up plied . th o ' l old the for r e : o t welr e Pro;e. 310 0 " 9• x rigth , obbiPg re ceig• o ha le ica ou t a 01 vit, Qf le, 2°4 i to the has O f let the I teriai a wi th . o detiP r, an d ~ ring 1- t to the savour" sponso r 7 , , tile ext, on ;Ey A° Ise, Oa. oche" part/ tiche o ious t 0 the'r yc j li► ily are frOsZ 3rt 91 ° Boil" .riliope the ir •el3o' an t°' avoi" to I% ana red °/. i ke Fa t oio r bun,' and 701 1.1 ' Low' e fol. seJ. icb• ule