The Sun. — London, England, 1821-08-01 00:00:00

THE toNDON7JOUifiVALs I)A11.13E. •EXTRACTS 'FROM - THE MORNING e4RERS. Aufpist 1. ' • [THE TIMFFI .We•have not perceived, from the slight perusal that we ordinarily give the Ministerial Journals, that any of them have noticed the important .and all but offt.cial. statement, that the King twiCe.,. during -the Queen's process in the I-louse -a ,olicited the accession of the Whigs to. °nice, and offered to barn out his present Mi nisters, both at the-beginning - and in . the mid dle of these proceedings, provided -their 'op ponents viould exert tirs.-!mselves 'to bring- the alfair• to a favourable conclusion. This is plac ing Ministers in a very scurvy situation -indeed; and that, not upon our judgment, or the judg. ment of the nation, but in the opinion of him . who• employs them—their Royal Master—the King himself. , What; we ask, can the niFterial Journals say to this ? His MAJESTY, they assert, and we cordially unite in the assert tion, is a most wise and enlightened Prince; but he despises their patrons, wishei to get rid of them, and would" take their enemies into office, if the latter wocad come in upon his terms: THE MENDICITY SOCIETY.—The monthly meeting of what is called the Board of Manage ment of the Mentlicity Society took place on Monday last, and their resolutions were inserted in our journal of yesterday We had not then any space to allow to the notice of them; and what we say now will be brief, the importance of the persons constituting the Board on this oc casion. being but humble. This Board, then, states in its resolutions, that " the investigation was originally entered into very reluctantly ; that " it was considered as an encroachment on " time that ought to have been devoted to other " purposes." This is rather an unexpected con cession. We should just wish to ask them what can be a more interesting subject of inquiry than a charge which imputes to one of the °Pieces of the Society; the repeated forgery of the name - of another officer of the same Society ?' Is it of no consequence what may he the character and conduct of the officers of the Society ? Supposing the charge true, is it lit that the Man guilty of such an offence should be in any degree trusted with the management of public fowls? And supposing it false, is it not of vital importance to the character of . the Society to show its falsehood ? Yet Allis, according to the resolutions of the last Board, is an investiga tion 'entered on with reluctance and a waste of time.—Such being .the resolutions of this Board, it may perhaps be superfluous to say any thing further of the members composing it. Certainly, had there been present any of the gentlemen With -whom we conversed on the subject, (exclusive of Mr. Tooke, the solicitor, but who, we suppose, attended. ex - oSicio),—had there been present any one of the former chairmen, we should have felt hurt at such resolutions agreed to by such men : we learn, however, that there were not more than half a score members left in the room when the resolutions were passed, and those persons, in point of property or charac ter, the least important members of the Society : it is therefore a triumph for the cause of truth and justice, that the cause opposed to it should appear in so deserted and forlorn a• situation. We suppose, then, we may take our leave of the Mendieity Society and its secretary till the next general meeting. There is only one point upon which there is assertion againstassertion between the person accused and us ;—between us, who could have no motive in the world but that of truth for selecting one man rather than another as the author of . the forgery, .and him who, we suppose, will be allowed to have strong reasons for denying the crime imputed to him: We must remark ; therefore, that it is totally untrue that Bodkin volunteered the production of the seal with which the forgery was impressed. He, strenuOusly , and perseveringly - denied the possession and knowledge of such a seal, till we showed himthative had other letters of his writing which bore the same impression, and then be gave himself 'the needless trouble of producing the seal. As to Mr. Irving Brock and Mr. Clement Poole, of whom the latter is the person who is brought forward to bear the blame of the forgery, a circumstance which no doubt renders him a very credible witness in favour of Mr. Bod kin,—as to these two gentlemen, we apprehend they may be allowed to dispose of each other. — Mr. Brock stated' Poole to be a person who durst not appear for fearof an arrest ; and Poole, in the hearing of Brock, bestowed the most odious epithets on the man - who had said this of him.— ( Mid.) . rAIOnNING cnnostcr,r,.] We understand that the reduction in the Army is now settled, and will amount to about, thir-, teen tho'i'and men (notwithstanding 'Ministers opposed every motion for reduction this Session), and we believe it has .now received the King's approbation: We have act yet heard what that of the Navy is to be, buf we presume consider able, as well as reductions in the Ordnance ; some of thelatter have already been proceeded on. Two Pamphlets were yesterday published by Mt'. Ridgway, on the,subject of the Greek. In surreriion, in which the.. question with regard to Russia is left almost;entirely out - of, considera tion. One of Wiese pamphlets, entitled " Re marks on the pyoent State . of Furl ey, consider ed in its Commercial and - Political Ite,iiition with, Engtand," dWells on the commercial advantages which wouid:a.ccrue"toEngland from the esta- , blishrneno.4 the ,independence of the Greeks,' i and on 0,6 power. which it has: to contribute to their re,afeneration. The other pamphlet is en titled " The eau* of Gre.ee the Cause of Eu 'rope," and bears to be translated from the Ger man. The. Author tells us, that the Turks. " have remained, to the present day, what they were when the first Turkish vessel reached the European coast—Asiatic barbarians, having nothing in common with the nations of Europe except the soil Lonr manners and civilization, our arts and sciences have still remained foreign. to them ;" whereas the Greeks have 44 not only_ remained a nation, but are still a European na tion—they still speak the language of their fore fathers—they still profess and practise the faith which obtains in Europe, and conform to Euro pean customs—they build .and preserve their vil lages and cities with the same activity and in dustry as other European nations, while those of the indolent Turks are suffered to fall into ruins —and they pursue both .domestic and-foreign traffic with indefatigable attention." The writer urges the Europeans in general to make common cause with the Greeks ; and the inducement - on which he lays the chief stress, is one which will render it no difficult matter to believe that he - - is :really a German, with the usual characteristics of a German philosophical poli tician.—" "Migration has ever proceeded from east to west: from Asia came the Germans ; and in Jater ages the Hungarians, the Huns, the Moguls and the Turks. The history of the world is in eternal repetition ] though we are unable to calculate time and c irc u m stance. But this is certain and self-evident, that the farther east ward the power of European nations is extended the more securely is Europe herself protected: It is an insufficient argument that our tactics and the superiority of our arms protect us ; that the Asiatic hordes can effect nothing against the disciplined armies of Europe. Our superiority, however great, is not greater than was that of the Romans 'over their invaders, yet they were conquered ; and it is little better than a truism to assert that physical power must ever ulti mately triumph over art." We are afraid that our German politician will find some difficulty in so posse;sing us with the dangers with which • we are threatened from the Mahometans in "the , East, as to join, on that account, in a general I crusade against them. ( Ibid.) [MORNING POST.] Letters and Papers to the 29th ult. were re ceived from France yesterday. Their contents increase in importance, and leave us little doubt that an arrangement has taken place between some, if not the whole, of the Allied Powers, to effect the deliverance of the -Greeks, and the final expulsion of the Turks from Europe. To such an arrangement we could only object if it were partial. To be effective and beneficial, it must embrace all the great European States. It must secure, if not their actual co-operation in the field, at least their declared approbation and consent; for divisions on such a point might lead to a thousand dangers, which perfect union must render chimerical. The main apprehension seems to be lest the power entrusted with the task of interfering should turn that interference into a source of personal aggrandizement. But the surest mode of causing that apprehension to be realised, would be to abstain or to secede from the compact ,by which that Power is to act for a common and 'not a private end. For se cession from such a compact, or a refusal to en: ter into it, might not diminish the means or the disposition which that Power possessed to interpose, but would enable it to do it without the restraint under which it would otherwise have acted. In that case the very evil which it was intended to avert might be produced by the course adopted for its prevention. But let all the European States join 'in the compact—let them solemnly bind themselves to form the Greeks into an independent kingdom, as soon as they shall have been redeemed from the yoke and daggers of their Barbarian oppressors—let them engage_to support that independence after it shall have been established, and all danger of particular aggrandizement must cease. [MORNING HERALD.] The accounts from Augsburg (a doubtful source) affirm that an Austrian army was to cross the Turkish frontier at one point, in concert with the Russian army,,which should cross it at another. This would correspond with the state ment of the rejection of Austrian mediation by the Porte. But, on the other hand, we as yet find no change of tone perceptible in the Austrian journals, which still manifest a decided bias to the Turks. The Porte is said to be deserted by his nominal subjects of the Barbary States and of Egypt. They have refused all aid, to the most earnest solicitations. In fact, the Porte has no refuge but in those Powers that are interested in pre serving the Turkish power—and both England and France are said to have already interfered efficiently. We only hope that the emancipation of the Greeks will be made the basis of media tion. It would deprive Russia of ail cover fot prosecuting her scheme of aggrandizement—it would leave the Porte still a power for all justi fiable purposes—and it would satisfy the hopes of those who feel for the classic nation, as well as the humanity of all the worl'i. It is curious that in the midst of the notes of ivar which these Journal set forth, they at the same time state, on the authority of commercial and financial ap- pearances, that European tranquillity will continue undisturbed. • [BRITISH PRESS.] It is impossible, when the question of an inva sion of Turkey by her powerful neighbour -is offered to public view, to dismiss every consider ation of the effects is hich such an occurrence might produce upon- the general politics of Europe. It is universally believed, as may be collected from the concurring testimony of all the continental papers, that the question has been formally submitted to the attention of the several Cabinets of the great Powers of Europe. Au impression has also been generally received on the Continent that the invasion of Turkey by Russia meets with the concurrence and approbation of Austria and Prussia, but that it does not receive the sanction of Great Britain and France. The measure, however, we are assured in an Augsburg Paper, has been finally determined by Russia, and it is further asserted that an Austrian Army will pass the Turkish frontiers simultaneously with the inva sion by the troops of Russia, for the purpose of acting in concurrence with them, and promoting the great object of giving security to the Greeks. A Manifesto is prepared which will shortly be published, and will explain to the world the mo- lives that govern the invading Powers, and the principles upon which they have deteimined to act. The importance of such a publication can not be estimated too highly; it will be looked for with anxious interest, and be read with avidity. 'NEW TIMES.] It ;s quite edifying to behold The Times be stowing its castigation on the Whigs, and ,the latter submitting so humbly to the Radical lash. The following elegantly Curned•sentence is sup posed by . the Editor to he addressed by, some person to the King They (the Whigs) have recently shewu themselves so humbled to your Royal wilt, that, after having pro tected the Queen upon the heinous charge of adultery, they are now ready to sacrifice her, because—yes, because---she is guilty of— of—of—noticing Alderman Wood ; and of— of—of—losing herself." Mrs. Slipslop herself could.not have outshone this brilliant conversa- tional style ;. and the taunt levelled at the Whig s for their envy of ,Alderman Wood, is turned with a felicity almo - st equal to that of the Worthy Al derman's own composition. On the other hand The Durham Chronicle, the great organ of the Northern Whigs, labours to avert the anger of the " Lead ing Journal" by the most flattering panegyrics on the honourable and independent feelings which have uniformly characterised the public labours of the Editor of The Times," and on his " unre mitted and effective exertions in the catie of freedom." These honied words do a little mol- lify the great man's wrath ; and he is pleased to admit that the article contained in The Durham Chronicle is an " important " one: and to sanction its perusal with, 4 4 We re commend it to general attention." An odd circumstance, however, occurs. We find The Durham Chronicle speaking of it as a matter of general notoriety, that pending the Queen's trial, the Government was twice offered to Lord Grey!! To which the Editor of The Times rather unceremoniously replies, that this is a fact with which he " certainly was not acquainted when he sat down to compose his remarks." If the story be true, it is very odd that it should have escaped the knowledge of a writer acting under the impulse of Absolute Wisdom ; and if the story be false, it is equally strange that it should have found its way into Mr. Lamhton's Chronicle, For our own part, we confess our-scepticism inclines strongly against the truth of the two offers, or, to speak rhore candidly, we think it a complete bounce, a la Times. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, JULY 31. THE ZION. NEWTON rELLowEs AND SON V. TILE EARL OF PORTSMOUTH AND OTHERS, TRUSTEES OF HIS ESTATES. Mr. HART moved the Court for a reference to the Master, for the purpose of approving and appointing a fit and proper person as receiver of the rents and profits of the trust estates of the Earl of Portsmouth ; and also that he, the Mas ter, might be directed to make farther inquiry, and.appoint a proper person to act as overseer of the estates in question, with liberty to cut down timber, and receive the price for which the same may be sold. It was also prayed that Mr. Mark Swade might be removed from the situation of Baillie, and that Mr. Young might also be dis missed from the office of receiver of the rents, &c. The following is a brief summary of the facts of the case :—The bill was filed by the plaintiffs against the trustees, and the Earl of Portsmouth as tenant for life of the several estates mentioned in the pleadings some time since. By the will of the late John, Earl of Portsmouth, executed on the 17th of May, 1791, it was provided that the present Earl of Ports mouth shou;d inherit for life both the English and Irish estates of the testator, subject to cer. tain annuities and legacies therein mentioned, with remainder to his issue, but in the event of his not having any children at his decease, then the property was directed to go to his secom: son, the Hon. Newton Fellowes and his issue About 1700 the present Earl made proposals 'of marriage to Grace Norton, (laughter of William Lord Grantley, and fears being entertained of his capability of managing his own affairs, a deed was drawn up and executed by him, by which he placed the sole management of his estates in the hands of four trustees, viz. the Honourable Newton Fellowes, Lord Grantley, John Garnet, and John Hanson, who were at liberty to take what measures they pleased for the benefit oithe estate, and in the event of either of the trustees dying, to nominate a successor in his room. They were also empowered to place annually in the English funds the sum of 6001. until an annuity of 14,000/, had been secured, when they. were to apply the surplus to the liquidation of the claims against the estate, or in support of the Earl and his family, and to make up their accounts every year, on or before the 2,5 th of December. Shortly after the execution of the deed, the nuptials were solemnised, and one of the Trustees (Mr. Garnet) dying, Mr. Justice Best fits appointei in' his room. In the month of October, 1513,, the Countess died, and shortly after the Earl married the (laughter of Mr. Hanson, another of the Trustees. From this time differences existed between the Trustees, and Mr: Hanson had, in some measure, the management of the estates, he having acted both for the late, as well as the present Earl, in the capacity of solicitor. It was now alleged, that in consequence of the conduct of Mr. Hanson, a receiver had become necessary, and in support of the application, various charges were brought against that gentleman. In con clusion, Mr. Hart expressed a hope alit the plea, which he understood would be set up, nftmely, that the reason Mr. 11. did not pay over, certain monies was, that he had a bill of costs as solicitor, which came very nearly to the amount of the money he was said to owe to the estates, would not be allowed as an excuse for his retaining it in his hands. Mr. WETHERELL and Mr. BELL were on the same side. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL and Mr. TRESLOVE contended, that the deed must be taken, to be in • • validated at the death of the Countess ) and the appointing A receiver could haVe no . other effect, than that of incurring most enormous- expellees. The Earl, it was also contended, in the course of the arguments adduced, waccapable of conduct= ing his own affairs, and was entitled to be relieved from a deed of so peculiar a nature as the one, in question. The estates; it was also asserted, were managed- as Well as they could be ;• and When it was considered that there were SOG Irish tenants, some idea would be had of the expence likely to be incurred, if a receiver were to be appointed:. Mr. HEALD, contended at. great length against the motion fora receiver, and expressed astonish ment at the total failure of the charges brought against his Client. If there were any blame at tachable to him, it was the neglect of •presenting his Bill of Costs ; but surely this could not be said to warrant the appointment asked for. The only good that could arise would be to incumber the estate with most heavy charges in passing, such voluminous accounts through the Master's Office. Mr. Fellowes's narne in fact, he said, appeared to the accounts that had been passed so late as 1819; and how l‘lr. Hanson could be said to have appropriated the money to his own use, was to him a . rnatter wholly inexplicable. If the Court should be of opinion that Mr. H. ought not to bold the money in his hands as a - set-off; it could order it to be paid into Court without ap pointing a Receiver, for which there was not the slightest necessity. Mr. SKI RIIO %V, for Lord Grantley and Mr. Justice Best, said his only wish was the Main tenance of the honours and dignities of the House of the Noble Earl. lie dwelt on the great ne cessity of preventing enormous expellees being incurred, particularly when it was known that there were not less than four or five suits insti tuted in the Court relative to these estates. The Loan CHANCELLOR remarked at great length on the nature of the deed, and the circum stances that characterised the present case, which gave rise to so many doubts. Adverting to the principal one, his Lordship said, in the present state of the case, he must certainly consider the deed to be a valid one, and in fact upon this point would the whole . turn ;..for if it was invalid there was an end to the cause ; but, as he had before said, he could not at present bring his mind to that conclusion. A. different feature might be given to it, if. a case to try that. question were put on the Record, and for this purpose be would allow the case to stand till Saturday ;. but if that was not done, he would on that day dispose of it, as it was of importance that the question should be set at rest. One Trustee, it was clear, could not take on himself to act for all the rest ; nor could he suffer the present alleged management to continue. In saying this he put wholly out of sight all the differences stated to exist, and 'should decide the case wholly. on the question as to the validity of the deed. (A notice was posted on the usual spot, an nouncing that his Lordship, would not possibly be able to continue the present Sittings after Saturday, the 25th of August.) COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JULY 31. PIPPET HEARN. This was an action of assault and false im prisonment, the declaration stating that . the defendant maliciously' charged the plaintiff with felony, and caused him to be - carried before Mr. Alderman Atkins, and detained for the space of four hours. The defendant pleaded —l. The general issue, Not Guilty ; and 2, that the plaintiff had feloniously taken and carried away a box of lace, wherefore the defendant laid hold of him, and gave him in custody of a constable, to be discharged, by due course of law. Replication de injuria, and issue thereon. Mr. SCARLETT, Mr. Anor,ruus, and Mr. OS BORNE conducted the plaintiff's case; and Mr. GURNEY and Mr. PLATT the defendant's. The plaintiff's case was this :—The plaintiff was described to be a young man residing in Somersetshire, carrying an business in the lace trade as a factor and Commissioner. Being in- formed by a' person named White, that the latter had a quantity of lace, worth 60 or 701. deposited in the hands of the defendant, who keeps the King's Arms Inn, Snowhill, on account of a per son named Strange, a lace manufacturer,. at Whaddon; in Bucks, it was agreed that the 1 plaintiff might have it for 401. The plaintiff not having the immediate commatid of sotnuch money, he communicated the circumstance to a Mr. Bridges, a laceman and hosier, in Wood-street, Cheapside, and the latter agreed to advance the money to redeem the lace. Having obtained a tt ritten order from White upon the elocendant to see the article, the plaintiff and Bridges went to the defendant's house and asked to see the lace. It was shewn to them, and Bridges being satis fied that it was worth 401. paid down the money, the defendant agreeing to deliver up the lace for that sum. The defendant took up the money, and said he must have 7s. more. Upon this there was some altercation, and at length Bridges gave the remaining money. As soon as the defendant got the money, he put the lace aside, and throw ing down a sealed letter, said " that is all you are to have for your 401." Mr. Bridges insisted upon having the lace or the money back, but the defendant refused both. Upon which the former snatched at the money, said he was not going to he robbed, and after a considerable struggle, got it back. The defendant, in his turn, struggled to re possess himself of it; but Mr. Bridges dashed in his hand through a pane of glass, and gave it to a porter who was in waiting to carry the box. of lace, and desired him to take it home. The de fendant then detained both the plaintiff and Bridges, sent for a constable, and had them taken to the Compter, where they were detained for two hours, and in about two hours afterwards, upon an investigation of the transaction before Mr. Alderman Atkins, they were discharged. To prove the case, Mr. BridgPs, Mr. Thomas White, and Mr. Payne, the Magistrates' clerk, were called. Mr. Bridges did not know where the plaintiff lived, nor did lie know any body who did. Mr. Nite described himself to be a general broker, living at No. C, M trket-Street, St. George's-market. He had had transactions • in flour, hams, Yorkshire cloth, and one or two ; in lace. At the time of this transaction, he had an office at No. 25, St. Swithin's-lane. About seven years since, he_returned from Hamburgh, and then had an office at N 0.7, Lilliput-lane. tie;Ni - as now a prisoner in tile King's Bench .frr-i. son, and had lodged IVithin:the rules for the last seven years, but had not•been.a - prisoner all that time. He had never gone by the Christian name' of-Marmaduke or Barthololnew.. To prove the defendant's justification, Richard Strange, the lace-manufacturer, of Whaddon, Sarah Waldock, a servant of the defendant, and John Short, the defendant's waiter, were called. The first proved that White had purchased 701. worth of lace, and had given him 301. in cash, and a bill for the remainder, which had been , shonoured. Being desirous of having some fr i more lace, he agreed to let White leave the bo%. of lace in question for 401. 7s. and deposited it in , the hands of the defendant, but with secret in structions to the latter to take the money if it came to satisfy the dishonoured bill of 401. and not . to deliver Up the lace. It • was in obedience to these instructions that the defendant had act ed in endeavouring to keep the money and detain the= box. The other witness proved, that after Mr. Bridges had dashed his hand - through the window with the 401. in it, the plaintiff seized- the box of lace, and was endeavouring to make off with it. He held the defendant's' wife with one arm,, and with the bOK in the hand of the other 'he held it over his her...l in a direction towards the passage leading from the bar. This was the ' only evidence to prove the ivtimit.c . fizrantli. The Loan QIIIEP JUSTICE said, there was nQ pretence for calling this a feiony. It was 1 10 more than a struggle for the possession of 0' property. If a person having even a colour ° f title tO . property takes it, that is not felony LTC his Lordship, in charging the Jury, told then.'' that they ought - to award damages to the plain" tiff with that temper and moderation which be; fitted a calm review of all the circumstances 0` to case. The Jury found their verdict for the plaintiff -Damages 301. COURT OF EXCHEQUER. a fter Saturday, which was the last day of the SittinC s Term, Mr. Joseph . Wilfred Parkins, the Ex-Sheriff, vil° during the day occupied a conspicuous place amongst the C 4 T, 1 , 1 1,1 sel, 'addressed the Court a short time before its rising*. %' ll `* - I;ittl he had a motion to make.—The CnrEr BAIiON desired to proceed. Mr. Parkins accordingly stated, that in the montb of ' WY ; last; an assault was sworn against him by a person of th e of David Price, and that he(ilir, Parkins) had entered i?rt° own recognizances in the sum 0f,201. to impear to take at the ensuing,Sessions fbr Middlesex ; that he accordinalYl fo tended at the last Session ; but when the - cause was cane°. trial, the prosecutor did not attmd, and he (Mr. Parkl” l ss ioa acquitted. He had since applied to the officer of .the t o Court for, a certificate of his acquittal, which '17,7.5 neeessq' st Nt prevent his recognizance-being estreated ; but-the (Aker ' re ; t_ .. o to give it without the production of the 0N ST Atr, an d he l t ( 7 / ,,, he only could compel him by uriking au application to ' 't i - rea' gistrates, at the next Session ; and in the meautinie he haei,,tea, sans to apprehend that recognilanc.7.s would he estr unless the Court should iutprfere:for Ins protection. de a' The CHiEr &alio* asked Mr. Parkins he had Ina aflidavit4 the facts liehad stated ? • his .1"1,..t. thi ß s a c rr 7o o u i r i t G m A ig n h u it o i i i v a . l — . ;: al l is tl zi , l i t nl 3 (:. Mr. Parkinsreplied it,- -- a - tive. . .' afridavit ; but you cAn niA - e one in a few. minutes,. ar" o f ou Court will enlarge the time for your producing the certificate that Parki n sw e your acquittal. - . t'le Mr. Parkins—" Thank coil, my ' LOrd ; I will make affidavit." e CHIEF.' BARCINT—". I hope Mr. Parkins you ivill'for;.7i - ve Tf i r for offering you one word of advice, which it may I , t , •-,7 , r,ki yo l. ',', while to Yelled on during the long vacation—am + . is, ri.:et your own lawyer." • . el. Mr. Parkins—" No; my Lord ; but IT be my own Cour% i cl: CHIEF' BARON—" Well, Mr. Parkins, you know what ' of a client yon have got." for producing the certificate. was enlarged. ea yourone-s.ply caricetnticiletTel Mr. Parkins soon after presented his affidavit, and the tli tle ....-=.--..wr... - . co Mr. Brszrop, - the Musical composer, 1v 35 - I . ( Friday last thrown from his . chaise and sever e ', 100' hurt.' The accident was.' Occasioned li,Y• his ' 1 falling, Owing to a dog crossing the road,at whic'' he took fright . r_.......... ... COURSE OF EXCIIANGE, July Sl. F. \ vastet dam - le c• t 2 13 Ditto, at Sight Rotterda m Vi 1 7 .Int well, . • Hamburg() 2B b , A. ** : : 1 - -i: 8 5 5 5 .., 1 0 . , S • 2 • , Altana Park, 3 Day's sight P_ Ditto Bonn!caul, ditto se, F ja t a a ,i t ii i rz li i L i l o'. tonl b e ;Oa: r.... , ............ .. .. ........... .... : 5 ,3 : 655: • f';'‘ F i :;ifi: _,, c .i ii iii ......... s5l 0,, Billion • ~ ......................... ' .......... • .3 5 Barcelona ieville ?.(q - Gibraltai ........ ' ..................... Leghorn ................................ . 47 ( Ip t ite . t tii: lo .. ................. )._.....tr.ii.;,i.it ............ 1 1 1 .. a .. 1 ... .............. i 1.671. GO op Lisbon - 41 , Oporto • 50 Rio Janeiro ' 49 Dublin .... Pi ...... Cori" 9 per Cent. ' , BULLION. r ef (11' Pot th gal Gold, it: Coin /.0 0 ~,° s Foreign Gold• - nt'13:irs . 3 17 1 " New Doubloons New DoMtr: ' • 0 4 ! i ° Silver in Liars. til;indlyd 0 4 . ,---- t ___ . _ _____---- ree , . O t 13411T11. 0f rse On the 23th ult., Mrs. Frederick I)evey, P° 1 1. Fleet-street, of a daughten . (lie i , : olY ° e On Nlor:day, at lus house in Chancery:lane , . ,ell -0, Curwood, Esq. Barrister at Law, of a son. „ T . , - . On Monday, the 30i.ii ult. the Lady of Dr. P; BaLOrd-place, Itusscl/-4quato, of a daughter. • i l itert INIArtaiED. - 0 09 r i oll Yester'2- - . • ). - i 31st 'ult., Miss M. Al. NAkr l3ll ', l o"e s " ~4 t. , r ~ ...,:: . - - ,- Im, Esq.,London, to Henry, Y °- '' 6 , 1 0 11 , 0 J.o::cs ;. :..,.'. . 7.:1., Citimington, Somersets: ll,- *-ko .) O. ", At Wini 7- • n the 30th ult., Ciptaia *J f 1 1 0, 1 , 1 , 0 1 3e '' Williams, or t.l , ' ; ',. Queen's Royal Iteginratooovi'" , Frances l'._;lea - 1 , - '' • , s- ,eldest daughter of M 3 t"-' 0 ''' 1 t° tl'C Esq., late o'..' - :i' • ,_': '. , -.fal , i ‘ le rt Mondays ...•,•: '. %t Halifax, Mr. John 1 1 °, 1 1 1 Dl;roti ie r Bedford, bet' . ! .. eden. This being the i ' . l , 1 heft I',ll. HAPPY S'rAi :i jll ,, 1 ;eel to the ilynienial altar, 3 ti : e y 11 l p 0 ', tie time. the LADy has- appeared at the same shrine, ~,6 t o . a , • t , on their return home by a procession of their frietT e d 1 0 bouts, pr,-ccded by a band of music, and 1131 plaudits of the assembled villa ;as. tri i° g',ls 'it DI f;D. l i r ij- li '' lat e 9-1 Saturday, July 2Faii, at the house of 1 , 3€• , 0 1 . the s ..Icendish-square, youngest daugh ter - 4 3 1•P' W ( i ) il n ia il ui. o l n ,i t t i r a l y gl , ra in ni f y i l ll a - r si t. ret, ,Berkelev,.squar.ep ,re F,Vall °r " d $., , o, . the infant daughter of H. Brougham, - Esq. , 11(:11c., at t" e v:,,:wd, On "fond ay Lift, in Ro they-street, l'enterigranden,virr 10 years, Jane 'Louisa, eldest daughter of J':, Bsci• o!„" t i t esi On the 23th ult.,- Ann wife ofJohn Str?-',..iuel 4, -1 At Hanwell, on the Ali ult., ao•ed 11. ':',.'''' bil, . . Kendall, son of the late John F' . . .11 P-e r ' , a t Oltitr,,/ ,i' 0 1 'N , Berbice. —... 7 ..............................--• • .25... I LO O N rm ll o p n . ( N i-s : tre P e r t i , nied Q SCRIPPS, OFFICE, No .112, Strand; where Auv" 14 1 " be "` ORDERS, LETTERS, &c. (post-paid) 0 f No.w i'7e3:Zs.:-qolitttl:atehre'ill;,P;;;.trit.einArsittilrbt!eiti' ,i)lefatlit7bsl6..;:llsksS :,.;-:!;4'5, Must