The Sun. — London, England, 1845-04-11 00:00:00

RE QUEE'v'S 1117:AlvT::(13-R0031". The Queen Queen held a drawing reom (the first this sea !Pi) yeeterzley afternoon, at St. James's Palace. Her • n iniesly and Prince Albert, attended by the royal suite, calved from Buckineham Palace at two o'clock, and wer e le ceit.ed I 'r the Lord Stewerd, the Lord Chamber lain, and the Mester of the Horse titr Royal Highness the Duchess of Kent, attended by Lady Anna Maria Dawson and Col. nel Sir George Couper ; his Royal Highness the Duke of Cambridge, attetided by Baron Knesebeck ; his Royal Highness the H ereditary G ran d D u k e of Mecklenburgh Strelitz, and his Serene Highness Prince Ernest of Hesse Philippstahl, arrived coon after two Aleck, and were received by the vice -Ch am b erlain, who conducted their Royal and Serene Highnesses to the r o y a l c l oset . The suite of her Majesty and Prince Albert included the Duchess of Buccleuch (Mistress of the Robes), the Marchioness of Douro, the Countess of Gainsborough, the Countess of Charlemont, Viecoun!ess Canning. and Viscountess Jocelyn, Ladies of the Bedchamber; Hon. Misses Stanley, Hamilton, Paget, end other Maids of Honour ; the Hon. Mrs. Arson, the Hon. Mrs. Gore Campbell, and the E ion. Mrs. Brand, Women of the Bedchamber; the Marquis of Exeter, Gro"rn of the Stole to his Royal Highness ; Nile.. George Bawer I An son, Tre asurer to his R yal Highness; Viscount Ha- warden, L or d i n Waiting; Sir Frederick SO% in, Groom lin Waiting. • CaptainsFraeei s Seymour, Groom in Waiting to his Royal Highness; C. den-1 Arbuthnot, Rt querry in W a i t i n g ; Col eiel Bonverie, Equerry to his oyal Highness; arid the Page s .f He onur in Wai ing. H er Majesty's Honeureb:e Corps of Gentlemen at Arm s were on duty in the Presence Chamber and Por trait Gallery, and also in the Bute rooms. Before the Drawing r.enn, her Mtijesty, accerd;ng to annual custom, received a deputation from Christ's Hies pital, in the Throne•room, who were ushered to the Presence of the Queen by Sir William Martins, Gentle i_n_an Usher in wahine . The deputation consisted of ,11r. in Thompson, M.P., the President ; Mr. Richard Hotham Pigeon the Treesurer ; Mr. James Bentley and Mr. Thomas ' Weeding, Governors ; accom- Pftnied by the ‘....Rev. William Webster, the Mathmatical forty '‘ Mr ' ri •H. Back, the Drawing Master, end the foundedoes educated ia the Royal Mathematical School by Kline cular interest . e Charles H. Her Majesty expressine an 01;iitit drawings and charts of thedeoys, than usual. pinion ma je.tsht; their execution was batter make known her , approuat i tnerously condescended to The scholars having retired from the 'rhr ne-room, the Foreign Ladies Ambassadors and Ministers, and their .. 0 , were introdeced, when the fellowing presenta- It .ions took place ir• the when circle : Madame la diplomatic de Flahault, Madame la Com tesse de Jarnac (on her marriage), and M a dame la Ba the de la Ronside, by the Countess de St. Aulaire, the French Amba,sadress, Madetneiselle Bun.en, by Madame Bunsen (her ti nin e t h e er), the Lady o f t h e Prussian Minister. Dac de Broglie, Pair de France, and Le Prince ue Bro b ass de d gate , fits d u D ue, et Secreta i re d e l'A m e Fr e a ' " P nee en Es scene by Count de St. Auia're, th nch A. ' ttisttl or b ' H 3 . ,CountAe R. Hinsky ' Cetiet Beekowsky, and Baron An Dibas hr s e aci nt t h lr a . l, by Count ' Dietricbstein , the Austrian M. Van Kerkhove Directeur de l'Administration du , i ri , tor Beige, and M. Von. Capenberg,. Inspecteur du 4 site., by M. Van de Weyer, the B leian :Minister. IBaron Arnim, Privy Councillor, and Prussian Envoy xtraordinary at the Court of Brussels, hy Chevalier unsen, the Prussian Minisw. ( T he Foreign Diplomatic circle was attended by the retch Ambassador and the Countess de St. Aulaire, Comte de Jarrett: First Secretary to the Embassy, le 'cumin de l e R onci e ra de Nourg, (Meier de la Marine ""Yale de France and Madame la Baronne de la Ron cieri l e Nourg ' the Austrian Ambassador and the e te °lllll ess D etria:stein, Baron Ko:ler, First Secretary . to sl -e Embassy, an d C our t 134er - hazy, Sarin] Effendi, e pit Embassy, Ambassador, M. Agop, Secretary Interpreter, kid Hassan Effendi. seeerei Secretary to the Embassy ; eta de W e y er , t h e B e l g i an Minister, a nd M r . Ch ar l es D ronet, Secr e t ary o f L ega ti on ; Baron de Cetto, Ba larlan Minister ; M. Dedel, the Netherlands Minister, C~M. de Stratenus, First Secretary to the Legati on ; Rant de P o ll ee, S ar di n i an Mi n i ster , and Count de evel, Secr e t ar y to t h e L ega ti on; the Portuguese Minis r and the Baroness de Mrvo, M. Lobo de Mara, irst Secretary of Legation, enco and Baron de Lag os , At Lad 6to the Leteation ; the Russian Minister and the Baroness de Brunnow, and M. de Berg and M. de K oudriaffeky, Secretaries of Legation ; Count Kielmann negge, the Hanoverian Minister ; the Prussian Minister and M a d ame B unsen , an d M r. E rnest B unsen ; the United States Minister and Mr. and Miss Everett, and Mr. Rives, Secretary of Legation ; the Danish Minister and Countess Reventlow ; Mr. Murphy, the Mexican Minister; Baron Gersdorff, the Saxon Minister; General Prince Castelcicala, Neapolitan Minister, and M. G. L'anofari, Secretary to the Legation ; Baron de Be llltu s e e ' Swedish Chargi d'Affaires, and le Comt e M. de Rosen, Aide de Citinp General and Chambellan au ,Service de Se M. le Roi de Suede et de Norvege ; le retron de Linden, Attach 6 to the Wurtemberg Legation. Among the general company were the Archbishop of .9anterb ur y, th e L or d Ch a ncellor, the Lord Steward, the '"rd Chamberlain, the Master of the Horse, the Groom of the Stole to Prince Albert, the President of the Board of Trade, the Captain of the Hon. Corps of Gentlemen a t - arms, the Captain of the Yeomen Guard, the Mar ' pis of Angles e y, G o ld Sti c k i n W a i t i ng ; t h e Vi ce 1 - ' e ttealayiain, the Treasurerof the Household, the Comp ironer of the Household, the Lord Chief Baron, Lord M o nteagle, the Comptr o ll er -G enera l o f t h e E xc h equer ; l e Lord Mayor and the Lady M a y oress , M a j or • Gener al Sir Wheatley, G.O H., Ke e p e r o f h er M a j es ty' s nov a H enryri vY Purse ; the Soli c it or -G enera l , t h e A ttorney -G e - ✓ for Irela n d, the Hon. Sir Edward Butler, Lieute n of her M a j es t y ' s H on. C orps o f Gentlemen-at ornls Sir Georg e Phili p L ee, Li eutenant o f t h e Y eomen sZ a rd • the Master of the Ceremonies. the Deputy e reta'ry-at-War, Mr. Sheriff Hunter, Mr. Sheriff Sid- AY, Sir Augustus Clifford, Gentleman Usher of the . tl e ack 13 ' 3 ( 1 _; Colonel Wood, Colonel Weare, Colonel H. . e liatinek, Colonel Clark Kennedy, C. 8., and K.H., and : zi.°.neel Dyneley, C. 8., A.D.C. to the Queen ; Lieu-e -x:et-Colonel M'Douall, 2d Life Guards ; Silver Stick, io,..jarnes Bunce Curling ; Adjutant of the Hon. Corps ekin entletnen-at-Arms • Mr. Ellerthorp, Adjutant ofthe a a fneo Guard ; Sir Benjamin Smith, C.S. ;_Lieute- the tiColonel Sir Frederick Smith, Gentleman Usher to of the r t r Y Chambers ; Sir Noel Harris, K.C.H. ; Groom 3t,„,,ery-riavayaCh_a.mber in Waiting ; Mr. Alfred Mont !sher to the Q u een Diggle, Gentleman lien ; Mr. Frederic Peel Round, ci: . an Usher of the Green Rod; Colonel Godvrin, Lien tle raa , Usher j to his Queen Wilsen e ulonel si r Royal Highness the Prince Albert ; any th e 1 Gentlemen Usher to her .. ".d Adjutant n I) 'wager ; Cu putin Siborue, Secretary follovvi n . Pt. Lathes.-.. nuctte.-.. ROyal Military Asylum, and the Mao ReEnZescjatG,rafton, Sutherland. vollNTEssr.a." 4—Nc)rnaanb Y, Cholmondeley. Win i ry, D 1 terton, Rosehe nniskillen' Beetive, Powis, Dowager Longford, Listow trim, Shelburn ''e'arr, Lincoln, Jersey, Sefton, e , Delhousie, Erni, Malmesbury, An- Haddingtol, 1:3, Clawdor, Eglinto n ' March, Hardwicke, B everley, ' e Grey, She ' C . Wicklow, , o wper, I T ISco ,_... UNTESSES.--G bill, Palmerston a go, Adare, Maynard Pollington, P , Dun , ,Iciwr nomoir garvon. _ telexes.-- a sh,,,A3l•Es•—Ledy King, Lady Somerville. t,?o,Ries, Oharlott ottuvart, 13. Johnstoue, Yarde Buller, keetlsa Piernro e uest, Thesiger Lee, Anne Primrose, !le e k Dal _ , 'e, Leuisa 'Ffghe, Aldis, Frederick Beau -1(!ed, L v 7 1 1, Mary Sackville West , Wheatley, Clif En' t e ' 1 , Ernes , B- d -4neY Herbert (3. :, t a enbll Brue.e, Couper, Ashbur tastbepe, i 0 . , ner,otte Herbert, Arabella Fermor, ine Charte yisa Oswalci, Beihavel, Mary Campbell, titheri riti, Louisa Tenison, Georgians Pakenhans, -1) ne Pakenh ogle Is a b ela 4M, Alice Peel,' Anne Wilbraham. do n e,',a Keith. Be t e h ' t'tarY Bereli . 'aaniont, Abinger, Alicia Gor y ariolio Bit) . even, Franctts,-Cole, Petre, Pearson, 4„gstre_ G . e on; Mary Stanley, Claud Hamilton, Sarah l;liri s r„ p Vi or 6 i. xart Wortley, Catherine Boileau, Mary Whirneliffe' Star Fitzroy, Theresa Lewes, S:anley, gust Vs . d, „ . 'flarY Hood, Ra,detock, Mary Fox, Au • lieteme nt , hi gtit. Honoria Cadogan, Clerk, Lyndhurst, _rrab ato, e r g ve 'tilers,- Adela Villiers, Hamilton, Hunter, ,-reilget, bi".l,,_ergina Bathur-t, Wilson, Peel, Adelaide , ‘ "ray n, uk_i_n_, Frederic Smith, Beauvale, Katherine 1-ettenhsh): Hood, Monteagle, Caroline S. L. Gower, 15 - 4 aye, o„ ib "arapson, Frances Iligehason, Clay, Lister 'er " ° Me V Maclaine,Franklin. Colehes p , Fr arfee , , erney, ,, 't es s bandon, Jane Howard, E. F. Drummond, Yeeser °ard, Stratheden, Albinia Foster, Mary Male c x C olv i lle. Mlioe , Ess— no Rutzen. lles' ( UR I•LE 44, i:Ni : a. s—Charlotte Petre, Agnes Petre, Miss , 4, tiles, 4 Johnth Mines, Caroline Gage Mrs. Anger a• - -ott. A t C• Erskine, Sophia Wheatley, Mrs. lal4_ n rs. Carew, Mrs. Philips. Miss Sidney, Miss Aiin, ...aY arci, Mrs. Leicester Stanhope, Mrs. Locke li *' 1 4. itiil 9 4 ' Soarl ey Colborne, Mrs. Disbrowe, Frances ,c . 4la, e i , mra.e, Mrs. Keith, Mrs. Robert Boyle, Mrs. A. rL I. Gra. Drummond, Mrs. &seam, Lady Borough, ..tttiittart, nthael Scott, Mrs. Charles Powys, Mrs. yi;set e li e _ ,_ Caroline Pepys, Miss Waldegrave, Miss n, Marra,lvaldegrave, Mrs. G. Darner, Caroline Lyttel bell, Campbell, P. Mary Pe ts Leuisie Camp k . Marshall, The Lady MayPo)ress. '• 8 1)•"18 ,--Sidn i`nil„ . o.e , . ey, Lefevre, Hogg, Aldis, Howley, dl e t iu 'rutth. E. Buller, Briscoe Frend, Belles's, ,__, .urehiso urges Watson, Somes, Alexander Hankey, i!!ichtted son, John Abel Smith, Villiers Stuart, Hibbert, Vt l Yn Shill. am ' Hampden, Arthur Shirley, Shirley, r , ra,i i Y, Corkran, Malcolm, Hunter, Beauclerk, wklee e i ' Ainsworth, Rob • ile es Dickinson G .1 Robert Gosling, Stephenson, ,)*("erforce Bi rd , ' e! i, Benyon, P. S imerset Butler, Joan Herb William Cornww I, Cenlvvell, Tulloch, Alf' , Y, Roberti-1' il e ee al -- ' ) nnd, Harcourt, William Stuart, 4 nel t nn tgoneer Gard 5 williarn Glad' Henry Addington. Henry Ben tie, liolt, Will' stone, H. St. John Mildmay, Bar eel' Sha w, r i 'nroson, Young, Milnes Ceaskell, Fred., ;el to e, ee. '. St. John Mildmay, Ram, Morier, Ile 'Lewis. ' uvvli %bend, Thomas Oliveira, R ' ' . 4tt °it, Franklaad le Ss ts—K ,„tird a 1 , , unter, 'IOW. ...Aller, s h vrJohnstone Elizabeth Jobitst 'tie, k.:,‘e,:kl, ee . s-2 ... _. _Lefe re, Helena Shaw Lefevre, ia 4 tller ine s e .` 7l4 itn, Hogg, Mary H o g_ Fanny Ciiff , rd, m ew _ „,. . &Low Stewart, Buller, 4 : ' it —. Welby M . ts.. yridhnna, Sarah ..._ r), t h e arlant?e Roberts Henkel' Pole Cowper. I hrin e • 1 tl eY, Emily Wilson , - ' ' Fit ~, ' tar • sSallvan Cavendish, blagt,y, E n i., "4n• Clerk, Isabella Cherie, Dame- Loporey, 1 Y 113 ring, Matilda Noel 11 Pole Sligh t, ‘, ,_ a. _ Boileau, D e K e • e. ~,,, ' til l , (3 Benyo n. , . ~z,n, ~,uirt, i. • , .rclev lieny ,, n, Ir d'th e p ittp. Loci 1)1‘b ovv:, rownsim'i'd• I • 'I ' 4 d, C " 3 ' "c 4 e, Hibb ' • '• ' ` es. a S hams of / tan e . Hibbert , Henrietta Cole, Drum twi Au 1, Merritt Au t "th e ' t nta Parry B .' • gus a Woodall, Maria b di , Hinet ena , ro ?inn g . , Gosline, Beauclerk, .._ ps ve , ~ .11, Hampden Lister ' 41 „kaps o Z* L. Chichester llt Hampden , o, Kaye, Mowbray, 'retir e ; ' Augu st , B "gginson, Catherine Smythe, tlut ** 414 % Grevin trd, Wilber rot ce• Bird, R dt, ‘„, ,-. 0 . e r e, Lucy Heye El t Clay mend, ,aura mor,er ~.• tzaoeth Clay, Pe nye, elay: mt ' 5l, Georgi a N ' .nlarY Drummon.l, Theresa u a enlle, Frances Neville, Fanny The f Alowing Gentlemen attended the Drawing- room : D vim —Buceletch. MARQUISES—HuntIy, Normanby, CllolololldelPy. EARLS—Rosoberry:Listowe i , Cadogan, Antrim. Lin coln, Lovelace, Pawls. Erne, Ros Ayn, Aberdeen, Ennis killer, Shelburne, Bective ; March, Wicklow. VISCOUNTS—Maynard, Polling ton, A dlre, Ingestre, Cantilupe, Nurtlaind, Paltnerston, Lake, Berehaven, Hill. BtsrroP—Woreester. Loxes —Sondes, liilmeny, Besumont, C. Hamilton, Cottenham, Colville, Stanley, Somerville, Belhaven, Beauvale, CaMpbell, A. Paget, Granville Somerset, Col chester, H. Lennox, A. Lennox. COUNT---Erlach. RIGHT HOSOURABLES—Sir Robert Peel, Sir Augustus Foster, Sir James Graham, W. Gladstone, F. Shaw. HONOIIITABLES —Captain Hood, Colonel Cavendish, E. Erskine, W. R. Colborne, Captain J. Maxwell, S. Lyttelton, C. Rice, Captain Harris, Y. Jocelyn, Rev. N. Grenville. SIRS—John B. Johnstone, John Guest, John Yarde Buller, Charles Aldis, Augustus Clifford, George Clerk, F. C. Hunter, H. Palliser, W. Clay, J. Boileau, El. Verrey, C. Wade, G. Wa'ker, J. Kaye. REv. Docrorts.— Scrobesby. F.R.S., Williamson. REVEREND.—James Nevill Heard. DOCTuRS —W Rae . Wilson, Aldis, Moore. SERGEANT-AT-LAW.-13vilasis. MESSIEURS.—Richard Hotham Pigeon, James Bent ley. Weeding, John Gregory, E. Buller, M.P., George Buckley Bolton, George Denne, _John Booth, Tighe, 11. ice, Murchi , on, Alexander Hankey, Henry Stuart, M.P., Hughan. D'lsraeli, R. Haywood, J. Somec, H. Wood, J. Somes, jun., J. Fog., R. Ho!lond, Cardwell, Shirley, C. Levey, J. Eld, Beauclerk, T. Gladstone, Stanley, Williams, R. Legh, W. Thornborough, De Horsey, J. Robinson, P. Howard, P. But'er, Ram, W. Doyle, J. Hardy, G. Mansell, J. Marshall, Pepys, R. Gosling, A. Wood, Page, Bethune, Disney, R. Mayne, E. Carver, C. Gibson, A. Oswald, N. Vaughan, Manes. Tenison, Bainbridge, Malcolm, A. Hambrough, F. Cavendish, J. Hornby, R. Blewicke, Hunter, Riddle, Stephenson, H. Irwin, 11. Cowper, C. Stronge, H. Smythe, Young:, Ainsworth, Gwynne, R. Godson, E. Shirley, W. Bird, G. Irwin, J. Palsgrave, Astley, H. Hamilton, A. Drummond, C. Jolliffe. FIELD MARSHAL —Duke of Wellington. GENERALS —L'Estrange, Sir Henry Watscn, Sir Henry Wheatley, G.C.H., Sir A. M.alaine, M•Leod, F. Farquharson, Sir Frederick Trench. COLONELS —Sir George Couper, Bart., Peel, Burnard, Cord wall, Tu!loch, Hon. L. Stanhope. George Higgin son, George Everest, T.R.S., Fox, Monteath, Cureton, C. 8., Bolt Gascoy ne. MAJORS—Sir James J. Hamilton, Bart., M. G. White, Cooke, Turner, Hon. George A. Browne; Schou swar, Jones, Henderson. CAPTAINS—Cuddy, H. G. Napleton. E.1.C.5., F. H. Jackson, Polhill, M.P., Bateson, M.P., H. W. Fraser, Shea, H.C.S., Hon. C. G. Scott, Hon. Robert Boyle, J. Penny, Kincaid, Fearon, Francis P. Nott. William Wood, De Bathe, A. Shirley, F. W. Hamilton, James M. 2.litr6 LrEurEvANTs.—Hogg, Rodney, JRRin Money, Hon. C. Powys, L. Gomez Da Costa, John C. Hain, Hay, A. P. S. Green, J. G. Wilkinson, Francis Koe, Charles Graves, W. Pogson, It. Craufurd, Pennington, Hig giuson. W. E. Remington, W. Yates Peel, M. Cowell, Francis, George Tamer, W. H. L. D. Cuddy, Pen nington. CORNET.—Greetham. ADMIRALS.—Lord Radstock; Sir R. Otway. CAPTAINS ROYAL NAVY.—Sir W. 'IL Dillon, R. B. Watson. Townshend, Sir J. Franklin, Byng, W. Hood, Hon. W. 187,- Troubridge, F. Wood, F. Hutton. COMMANDERS.—EIIieorc , •, Woodgate, Dumaresq. LIEUTENANTS (ROYAL NAVY.)—J. Bletekmore, Old mixon, H: G. Keane._ _ _ . The following Ladies had the honour of being pre sented to the Queen: — Mrs. Sames. by her Grace the Duchess of Buccleuch The Hon. Mrs. John C. Erskine, by the Countess of Jersey The Countess of Enniskillen, on her marriage, by the Countess de c..4rey Lady Thesiger, by Lady Peel Lady Lee, by Lady Radstock Lady Dalmeny, on her marriage, by the Countess of Rosebery Hon. Agnes Petre, by Lady Petre Hon. Elizabeth Mulles, by Lady Sondes Miss Buller, by Mrs. E. Buller. Miss Fanny Clifford, by her mother, Lady Clifford Miss Hogg, by her mother, Mrs. Hogg Miss Mary Hogg, by her mother, Mrs. Hog; Mrs. Briscoe Friend, by Mrs. Alexander Hankey Mrs. Bellasis, by Mrs. Greene Mrs. Sidney, by Lady Graham Miss Hunter (Daughter of Sheriff Hunter), by Lady Graham Miss Elia ibeth Johnstone, by her mother, Lady B. Johnstone Miss Helena Shaw Lefevre, by Mrs. Shaw Lefevre Miss Wyndham, by her m9ther, the Countess of Listowel Hon. Mrs. Angerstein. on hor return from the Continent, by the Countess of Charlemont Mrs. Rundle Barges Watson, by Lady Follett Miss Sarah Maris Welby, by the Viscountess Canning Miss Hankey, by her mother, Mrs. Alexander Hankey The Duchess of Grafton, by Lady C. Fitzroy Miss Marianne Roberts, by the Countess of Beetive Countess of Longford, by the Countess of Wicklow Viscountess Hill, by the Marchioness of Cholmondely Right Hon. Lady Somerville, on coining to the title, by Mrs. Hunter Lady Claud Hamilton, on her marriage, by the Coun tess of Wicklow Lady Dillon, by the Dowager Viscountess Dillon The Baroness de Rutzen, by the Lady Anne Charteris. Lady Caroline S. L. Gower, by the Duchess of Su therland Mrs. Richard Godson, by Lady Stanley Hon. Mrs. Disbrowe, by Lady Albinia Foster Mrs. Hamden, by Lady Cottenham Lady Franklin, on her return from Van Dieman's Land, by the Countess of Haddington Lady Easthope, by Lady King Lady Arabella Fermor, by the Hon. Lady Borough, her grandmother Lady Louis Oswald, by the Countess of Sefton Lady Doyle, on her marriage, by Mrs. Milnes Gaskell Lady K. Pakenham, by the Countess of Longford Miss Cavendish, by Mrs. Harcourt Lady Georgians Pakenham, by the Countess of Longford Lady Louisa Tenison, by the Countess of Rosebery The Lady Mayoress, by Lady Graham Mrs. P. Somerset Butler, by Lady Louisa Tighe Mrs. John Hornby, on her marriage, by Lady Stanley Mrs. Tulloch, on her marriage, by her mother, Lady Pearson Mrs. Cardwell, by Lady Stanley Mrs. Evelyn Shirley, on her marriage, by Mrs. Shirley Mrs. C irkran, by the Duchess of Grafton. Mrs. Malcolm, on her marriage, by her mother, Mrs. Shirley Mrs Stephenson, by Lady Belhaven Mrs. aauclerk, on her marriage, by Lady Frederick Beauclerk Miss Wilberforce Bird, by the Lady Frances Cole Miss Augusta Bird, by Lady Frances Cole Miss Hampson ' by her mother, Lady Eiampson Mrs. Hibberts, by the Marchioness of Cholmondeley Miss Augusta Woodall, by the Viscountess Canning Miss Matilda Noel, by the Countess of Gainsborough Lady Beaumont, on her marriage, by Lady C oldies ter Lady Aoineer upon coming to the title, by Lady Strath eden and Campbell Hon. Mrs. Robert Boyle, on her marriage, by the Vis- countess Dungarvon Hon. Mrs. C. Grantham Scott, on her marriage, by her mother, Mrs. John Abel Smith Hon. Mrs. Charles Powys by Lady Mary Fox Mrs. Wilberforce Bird by Lady Frances Cole Miss Emily Wilson by her mother, Lady Wilson Mrs. Arthur Shirley by Mrs. Shirley Miss Louisa Benyon by Lady Katherine Jermyn Miss Hibberts, by the Marchioness Cholmondeley Miss Gosling, by her mother, Mrs. Robert Gosling Miss Hampden, by her mother Mrs. Hampden Mrs. Beuyon, by Lady Katherine Jermyn Miss Benyon, by Lady Katherine Jermyn Miss de Rutzen, by her mother, the Baroness de Rutzen Miss Pepys, by her mother, Mrs. Pepys Lady Isabella Kt4th, by the Countess of Haddington Miss Fitzroy, by her mother, Lady Charles Fitzroy Hon Miss Sidney, by Lady Mary Fox Miss Isabella Sjnythe, by the Countess of Wicklow Miss Henrietta Cole, by her mother, Lady Frances Cole Miss Drummond, by Lady Elizabeth Drummond Miss Ma:ia Shaw, by her mother, Mrs. Frederick Shaw Miss Augusta Parry, by Lady Somerville Miss Smy the, by the Countess of Charlemont Miss Catherine Smythe, by the Countess of Wicklow Miss Philips, by her mother, the Hon. Mrs. Philips Miss Georgiana Greville, by the Countess of March Miss Elizabeth Clay, by her mother, Lady Clay Miss Higginson, by her mother, Lady F. Higginson Mass Mary Elizabeth Chichester, by the Hon. Mrs. Leicester Stanhope Miss Laura Morier, by Mrs Monier MisA Mary Drummond, by her mother, the Hon. Mrs. Charles Drummond Miss Townshend, by her mother, Mrs. Townshend Miss Ram, by her sister, Mrs Ram The Honourable Mary Campbell, by her mother, the Lady Stratheden and Campbell The Hon. Mrs, Keith, by the Countess of Haddington Miss Darner, by her mother, the Hon. Mrs. G. Darner Ttie 11,m. Frances Mary Scarlett, by her mother, Lady Abinger The Hun. Mrs Carew, on her marriage, by her mother, the Hon. Mrs. Philips Hon. Caroline P. pys, by her mother, Lady Cottenham The Countess of Erne, by Lady Wharncliffe Mrs. Geils, by her mocker, Mrs. Chit' les Dickinson Mrs. Humphrey St. John Mildmay, by Lady B. John- stone The Hon. Mrs. Doughty, by the Hon. Mrs. G. Darner Miss Louisa Di4browe, by her !nether, the Hon. Mrs. Disbrowne Miss Boileau, by Lady Catherine Boileau Miss Fanny Clay, by her mother, Lady Clay Her Majesty and Prince Albert, and the royal suite, returned to Buckingham Palace, after the Drawing- room. Sir William C. Ross, R.A., bad the honour, yester day, of taking the first bittibg for a miniature of Royal Htgnoess the Princess Royal, by command of his itopl. Highness Prihci Alb rt. THE HAMPSTEAD AND ST. GILES'S MURDERS.- Both the prisoners, Hocker and Conner, who stand charged with these murders, will be defended oat of the Sheriffs' Fund, the fees of counsel and the expenses attendant on obtaining the attendance of witnesses being defrayed from that source, the prisoners being without sufficient means of their own for that purpose. They are indebted to the sheriffs for thus placing them in as go od a position as Tawell and Belaney, with all their wealth, on , the occasion of their trials. THE ROYAL MAIL STEAM- PACKET COMPANY. The General Meeting of the Propr'etors of this Com pany was held yesterday,. at the London Tavern, for the purpose of rec.: , iving the report of the Directors on the drain of the Company, for the year ending the 31st of December last; and also ;or the purpose of electing two Directors and one Auditor, in the room of Andrew Col vile, Esq., and of Russell Ellice, Esq., Directors, and Abraham G, Roberts, Esq., who went out by rotation. J. Tavnto, E-q., M.P., took the chair at one o'clock. Upon taking the chair, the Hon. Gentleman said he had great satisfaction in informing the meeting, that the statements the Directors would have to submit to the meeting were of a most gratifying description. The Directors felt warranted in expressing their Jest hope in the expectation of a successful future.--(Cheers.) The Hon. Gentleman then called upon the secret try, Mr. CHAPPELL, to read the report, which he did as folloß s : After the difficulties encountered by the. Royal Mail Steam-packet Company at the commencement of is career, many of which were unavoidable upon the for illation of a steam enterprise more complicated and gigantic than had been undertaken by any Government, far less by a mercantile association ; and after having surmounted the forebodings of those who naturally doubted the possibility of placing the concern upon a regular and secure basis, it is with sincere gratification the Court of Directors submits, upon the present occa sion, a statement of the accounts for 1844, not only realising, but exceeding, the expectations entertainer) by the Directors, at a period when the Company's affairs had an appearance of very serious depression. How far these anticipations (founded upon the intro duction of a modified plan of packet service, in 1843) have been verified, will appear evident, by contrasting the results shown by the accounts for the years 1843 and 1844, as follows :- 1843. 1844.. Receipts £321,581 ... £364,610 Expenditure Surplus • . 94,219 ... 147,749 Looking at the probable results of the plan of service then coming into operation, the Directors also ventured to predict, in October, 1843, that the surplus upon the working account for 1844, as compared with the surplus for 1843, would be increased to a total of 120,0001., whereas it proves to be 147,749/. The profit and loss account now presented will also show that, after liquidatinc , the loss of 32,0571., exhibited, on closing the accounts of 1843, the balance of profit up to the end of 1844 is 50,107 L, exhibiting a difference between profit and loss accounts of 1843 and 1844 of no less than 82,1641 _ _ While the results upon the monetary affairs of the Company are of so encouraging a description, it is an additional gratification to add, that the present plan of packet service has worked for the last two years with a regularity alike satisfactory to her Majesty's Govern ment and the public in general ; and in proof that the Company's interests have al-o been benefited, it will be sufficient to state that the receipts from freight and passage money for 1844 have considerably exceeded what they were in 1843. Although the unexpected and inexcusable loss of the Actium deprived the Company of a vessel well calcu lated for iutercolonial service, yet the Directors have been able to replace her by tho purchase of the Rein deer, a vessel in excellent condition, of nearly equal ton nage and greater proportionate power. • Since the end of the year 1843 the loan of 50,000/. has been paid off, and the Company is consequently entirely out of debt to the present moment.—(Loud cheers.) This statement, however, being applicable to the present time, is no doubt in some degree anticipatory of the cur rent half year's transactions. After much negotiation . the Hon. Board of Customs, daring the last year, made arrangements to enable the Company's steam ships to load, embark, and tranship mer chandise in the British colonies, under regulations suited to the peculiar nature of the service ; and although only a limited space can be appropriated on board each ship to this purpose, yet the Directors trust sufficient may be carried to augment the future receipts of the Company. During the year 1844 six of the Company's steam ships were docked, caulked, and recoppered, being one more than was stipulated for in the Ccmpany"s contract with Mr. Pitcher :, five others will.be similarly refitted during the present year ; and the whole are therefore maintained in the highest state of efficiency. TAing into consideration all the circumstances of the Company, the Directors, notwithstanding ti e amount of loss during the two first years of the service was con siderable, are of opinion that it will be more acceptable to the proprietors to receive a portion of the profit on the last year, in the shape of dividend, in preference to applying the whole amount to a* fund for the replace ment of capital ; and they therefore recommend the payassnt of 11. tOs. per share as a dividend for the half year ending December 31,1844 ; and that such dividend be =vie payable at the offs s, of the Company on and after the 28th instant, on all shares then registered. This dividend will require 21,0151., leaving 29,0921. applicable to the fund in question, or to other purposes. The CHAIRMAN then put the question that the report be received, which was unanimously agreed to. Mr. PoYNDER was highly gratified at the report that had been just carried.—(Hear, hear.) He believed that there was not a more wholesome school in which to teach wisdom than adversity—(Cheers)--and to that, and that alone, it was that it wa to btl'attributed that the pre sent great undertaking had been accomplished. They had formerly to meet with shoals and quicksands, taut he trusted that they had escap?d from them, and that they were now in deep water, with plenty of sail ing room.—(Hear, hear.) He could not think that the Court of Proprietors would do their duty nuless they marked in some substantial manner the respect which they entertained for the course that the Directors had pursued. He should propose that the sum of 2,0001. be appropriated out of the balance of the account that day laid before the Proprietors, and paid to the Directors as a remuneration for their services during the past and present years, and that in future an annual sum cf 2,000/. be appropriated for the like purpose. Mr. UILLS seconded the motion. He thought they ought no longer to accept the gratuitous services of the Directors. The CLIAIRMAN then rose and said—Gentlemen, as one of the Board of Directors, I feel called upon to re turn our grateful thanks to the Hon. Proprietor who made the last motion, and, especially to this large and respectable meeting, for the manner in which they have received the proposition made by the Hon. Proprietor. He has not done the Court of Directors more than Justice in Auting the great anxieties which they have expe rienced in encountering the difficulties and in endea vouring to overcome them. During die long period in which unsuccess attended their exertions, the Directors were never dismayed.—(Cheers.) They never swerved from that course which at first they pointed out for themselves. They had been ever actuated by the prin ciple of being unchecked. unbiassed, and uninfluenced by the opinions of the public out of doors —(Cheers)--and withoat looking at the circumstances that attended great operations, I believe that the present Company have exerted themselves in a degree unparalleled by any individuals, and even by Government itself.—(Cheers.) I believe that notwithstanding the crisis of our affairs we have now passed the rubicon, and that in future there is nothing but pleasing anticipations in view. Captain SWEENEY bore testimony to the conduct pur sued by the Directors. He was perfectly willing, indeed he felt it a pleasure ' to support the proposition, but, at the same time, be felt bound to censure the captain of the Acteon.—(Hear.) Mr. COLVILLE, the Deputy-Chairman, said the Direc tors had done all they could on that subject, for they had discharged all the parties connected with the transaction. Captain WEISE, R.N., said that the proceedings of the Company had met with the greatest satisfaction in The motion was then unanimously agreed to. The Directors that retired by rotation were re-elected. Mr. ROBARTS was then re-elected auditor, and upon being so, he declined receiving any remuneration — (cheers)—his duties being so trivial. The meeting then adjourned. 1845.—The following is the House List of Gover nors and Directors of the Bank of England for the year en suing, viz.:— FOR GOVER2JORS. John Benjamin Heath, Esq„ Governor. William R. Robinson, Esq., Deputy. Governor. ICOR DIRECTORS. Edward Henry Chapman, James Malcomson, Esq. Esq. James Morris, Esq. William Cotton, Esq. George Warde Norman, Esq. C. Pascoe Grenfell, Esq. James Pattison, Esq. Abel Lewes Gower, Esq. Sir John Henry Pelly, Bart. John Oliver Hanson, Esq. Christopher Pearse, Esq. Kirkman Daniel Hodgson, David Powell, Esq. Esq. Sir John Rae Reid, Bart. H. Lancelot Holland, Esq. Thomas Charles Smith, Esq. J. Gelibrand Hubbard, Esq. William Thompson, Esq., and Thomas Newman Hunt, Esq. Alderman. Charles Frdk. Huth, Esq. Thomas Matthias Weguelin, Alfred Latham, Esq, Esq. William Little, Esq. Francis Wilson, Esq. The election for Governor and Deputy. Governor will be held at the Bank on Tuesday, the 15th, and for Directors on Wednesday, the 16th inst., from ten o'clock in the forenoon till four in the afternoon, Colonel Sir William Robert Clayton, Baronet, has arrived at 79, Gloucester-place, Portman-square, from Harleyford, Bucks. The Dirctors of the Chichester Railway purpose opening to Worthing from Shoreham in the autumn of the present year. The works are proceeding most satisfactorily. —Brighton Gazette. HOCKER AND HIS APPROACHING TRIAL.—In the course of Wednesday it was announced to Rocker that his trial was positively fixed for Friday; he received it with the same degree of indifference that has characterised his demea nour during the whole period that he has been in the gaol. Several highly indecorous rumours have been set afloat as to the source from whence the prisoner has been enabled to obtain the benefit of counsel. We have it from the highest authority that his brief was handed to Messrs. Clarkson and Ballantine through the Sheriffs, consequently the expense of his defence falls upon the county. On Sun day last, when his fellow-prisoner Connor was introduced to the chapel, observing his dejected appearance, he stood up and closely scrutinised his features. Upon returning to his cell, he inquired very earnestly as to the par ticulars of his case, to which he paid great attention. We would remind the public, although ordinary prisoners may become acquainted with what is passing without from the new comers, it is impossible for prisoners similarly situ ated to Hocker, who are always watched night and day. A few days since several of the more respectable prisoners in that portion of the gaol termed the master's side were or dered into the yard, and shortly after Rocker was intro duced amongst them, and they were requested to mix indis criminately with him. The prisoners at first supposed he had been brought out for an airing. In a few minutes, how ever, a person entered the 3 ard, and, advancing towards Hocker, exclaimed, " This is the man." The prisoner said nothing, but smiled. Upon the gaoler taking him by the arm to gonduct him back to his cell, he turned to those pri soners near him, and said, In the coolest manner, " (mile• men, good morning." He is represented as sleeping well, and partaking regularly of his meals. TITS SUN, LONDON, PRIDAY MORNING, APRIL 11, 1845. IMvERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF COSI,IIOIVS, April 10. The SPEAKER took the Chair at Four o'Clock, when, fitter the presentwicn of sf:veral petitions on private Bills, the following Bills wt re rPart a first timet—The Preston and W 3 re Railway Bill; the Grand Junction Railway B II; the London and South• Western Railway Upward Branch; the Exeter and Clediton Railway Bill; and the Dublin and Bilast Railway Bill. The Hartle pool Pi« r and Port Bid, and the Tam,ton Gas Bill, were read a second time.; anti di., Thanks Navigation Debt Bill a third time. _ Petitions were presented against the Lorr!on and Yotk Railway, which was referred to the Committee ; against tha WQst Riling Junction Railway, rtte Huddersfield and Nianehtster Rails% ay. tile Waterford ar,d Kilkenny Rail way, the D-.rby and Bo:ton Railway, and the Liverpool and Bury Railway. Petitions vtere presented in favour of the London, Western, and South Staffordshire Railway, the Hen-ford Railway, and the Eastern Union and Harwich Railway. J EWISH DIsABILI PIES. Mr. AIUNTZ presented a petition from the Mayor ami Corporation of Birmingham, in favour of removing all the civil disabilities under which the Jews labour. NIAYNOOIII. Petitions from various places in England and Scotland, against the grant tu Maynooth, w. re presented by Mr. Muntz, Mr. Buck, Mr. Aaron Chapman, Mr. Powed, Mr. Packe, Mr. Masterman, Colonel Silrhorp, Mr. Sheridan, Mr. Bud ild, Mr. Stafford O'Brien, Mr. Christophe r , M r . Thornely, Mr. 0. buncombe, Sir Charles Lemon, Lord Ashley, Mr. HaweF, Mr. Plumptre, Captain Plumridge, Mr. Aldam, and several other Hon. Members. HILL-COOLIES. Dr. BOWRING presented a petition from Leighton Buzzard against the importation of Hill-co, his into the West India colonies. The lion. Member also presented two petitions from the operatives of Scotland praying the House to limit the hours of labour. MEDICAL REFORM.. Mr. COBI)EN presented a petiti,n fr , lm the medical practitioners of Scotland against the Aleheal Reform Bill. COUNTY COURTS. Mr. ESCOTT presented a petition from Mr. William Leonard Platt, a barrister of considerable Experience, stating that from his personal knowledge he was con. rinced that great abuses existed in the timaPer Crown Courts of this country, and praying for their removal. MA YNball. will be another opportunity afforded him, or any otl.er Hon. Member who - may choose to do an, of presenting petitions against the principles of this Bill, even before going into Committee on the question of the endowment of the College of Maynocith. But at the same time he felt bound to say that, undrr all the circumstances, he did not think it urst-asonable that he should prrss on the question at the time he had given notice of his inten tion Of doing se. . Mr. T. D'UNCOMBE would wish to ask a question of the Hon. Member for Sheffield (Mr. Ward). It was this. Would he not be in precisely the same situation in making his motion at the time he had now stated as if he brought it on to-morrow in accordance with his ori ginal motion ? In his (Mr. Duocombe's) opinion he would, and, theretbre, he would wish to ask him, did he intend to give up his motion altogether ?—(Hear, hear.) Mr. lII.TME begged to ail: the Speaker whether it would be competent for him to move an amendment at the same time that the Hun. Member for Sheffield (Mr. Ward) moved his upon this question ? • The SPEAKER said that the Committee on this Bill could not entertain the motion of the Hon. Member for Sheffield (Mr. Ward), otherwise than as an instruction to the Committee, which instruction he (the Speaker) understood would be to the effect that the support of the College of Mayncroth should not be defrayed out of the ,Consolidated Fund ; therefore, if the motion of the Hon. Member fur Montrose should be to the tame effect, it could not be put, as it would be impossible for the House to give two such instructions to the Committee at the same time. Mr. HUME—Then he understood that the motion of the Hon. Member (Mr. Ward) was to come before the House in the shape of an instructi.in to the Committee. Mr. HINDU:I said he would wi3h to know what course the llon. Member fix Sheffield intended to pursue ? Mr. WARD said he would state that to-morrow. THE UNIVERSITIES OF OXFORD AND CAM BRIDGE. Mr. CHRISTIE then rose to male the motion of which he had given notice—" That an humble address be presented to her Majesty, praying that she will be graciously pleased to appoint a Commission, to inquire into and report upon all matters relating to the privi leges, revenues, trusts, and to the state of education, b learnin., and religion, in the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, and the colleges of these Universities." Ile felt the difficulty of the subject he had to bring before the House, but looking at its importance he did not shrink from the responsibility. There was no sub ject that was of more importance than the one he had now to bring before the House. The subject of the Universities was one that it was diffi tuft to touch upon, but still it must be considered that there were many points that were deserving the con sideration of the House. tie would now refer shortly to what had taken place There was an endowment for each Regius Professor of 2401. a-year. 'l'h re were endowments for the Lord Almoners, Professors of Arabic in the two Universities, of 6402 There were eighteen canonries, three benefices, and various other pi-ces of preferment annexed to different professorships in the Universities. There were various canonries attached to the headships of different colleges. In addition to this a sum of 5001. a year was paid to eagle of the Universities by the Board of Stamps and Taxes. The history of that payment was singular. It appeared that in former times the .Universities possessed the exclusive privilege of' printing almanacs ; for the exercise of this privilege, the Company of Stationers paid to the Universi ties 1,0001. a year. In the year 1775 the Com pany of Stationers declined to make the payment, and in an Act which passed shortly afterwards, imposing a stamp duty upon almanacs the Universities had interest sufficient to procure the introduction of a clause authorising a e ayment to them by the Board of Stampe and Taxes of 500/. a year each. The duty on almanacs had been repealed, but the payment to the Universities of 1,0001. a year by the Board of Stamps and Taxes still continued. Now no one would grudge that payment of 1,0001. a year to the Universities ; but it was only fair that in return for payment made services should be rendered ; and he should like to know what services the Universi ties performed in consideration of that payment. The Universities shared with the King's printer the mono poly of printing Bibles, Prayer- books, and Psalms. For in a return, which was made in 1815, of the value of Bibles and other books printed under this monopoly, it appeared that in each of the seven years ending the sth April, 1815, the average va . ite of Bibles, Prayer-books, and Psalms printed by the University of Cambridge was 21,293/. ; and by the University of Oxford. 30,4171. ; calculating the profit of 25/. per cent. which might be considered as a moderate profit, it would give 5,0001. a-year to Cambridge, and 7,000/. , s- Tear to Oxford as their p ro fi t f rom t h e Bibl e monopo l y. his monopoly was exercised under peculiar advantages. There was no paper duty paid on the paper on %Mob Bibles and Prayer-books were printed, and they also en joyed an exemption from paper duty on paper used in printing books in the Latin, Greek, Northern, and Oriental languages. The amount of paper duty remitti d to Oxford on this account, for ten years, was 37,345/, and to Cambridge, 28.2481, giving 3,7001. a year to Oxford, and 2,3301. a y ear to Cambridge. The lion. Baronet the Member for the University had moved for some returns of the amount received for stamp duties on degrees. These returns showed that the public revenue had received from that source 2.730/. on the average ) early from Oxford, and 3,3401. from Cambridge. Ile thought, however, that the Hun. Baronet was hardly justified in considering that as a set-off against the evils which he (Mr. Christie) complained Of. The payment of that money was made by persons who matriculated at the universities and took degrees. A master of arts had to pay 61. for stamp duties, but he also had to pay as much as four times that amount in fees. In fact, be (Mr. Christie), thought the stamp ' duties were a benefit to the Universitie e for ono and a half per cent. was returned from the Stamp office, and this was not given to the person who had matriculated, but .went into the coffers of the Universities.—(Hear, hear.) By the Copyright Act a copy of every book that was published in the United Kingdom had to be sent to the Universities. From the evidence which was taken before the Copyright Corn mittee, it appeared that this was looked upon as a heavy tax by all authors. By the existing law i an author could only possess a copyright in his own works for a period of forty-two years, but the Universities had a perpetual copyright given to them in any book which they might pub lish. There were many other advantages which the Universities possessed. They were exempted from the operations of the statute of Mortmain. An other important privilege which they posses se d was, that with respect to the medical profession, the Universities possessed the peculiar faculty of grant ing degrees for the purpose of practising in the ecclesias tical courts. The Universities also possessed the peculiar privilege of saving time to the students for the other law courts. for an individual who had obtained a degree in one of the Universities had the great advantage in some of the inns of courts of passing through his novitiate in a considerable less time than others could do. Another advantage which the Universities possessed, and one which gave them consi derable power, was the amount of church patronage which they held. The University of Cambridge held church patronage to the extent of 305 livings, and be saw by the Cambridge Calendar, that their aggregate value was upwards of 113,000/. a-year. The patronage of the University of Oxford was still more ex tensive, for it comprised not less than 440 livings. The calendar of this University was not so explicit as that of Cambridge in stating the annual value of these livings ; but if he estimated them according to the rate only of those in the possession of the Uni versity of Cambridge, the sum would amount to 308,000/. a-year; and, beside this, they possessed privileges worth not less than 173,000/. a year. Fn addition to all this, these Universities were, in many in stances, by far the most advantageous avenues to the learned professions, and in some instances they were the exclusive avenues to those professions. He hoped that it would not be said that the State had no right to inter fere with the Universities, for he had alway understood that the State possessed paramount authority. But if this were at all doubted, he would cite a passage which ap peared in a State document someyears ago. The documen t to which he referred was a commission issued at the time the Right Hon. Barpnet opposite was Secretary o! State for the Home Department in 1827. It was a commission for inquiry into the state of the Universities in Scotland. It stated that several omissions and other irregularities had been committed in these Uni versities and giving a power, under the au thority of " our sovereign Lord the King," to inquire into and amend those irregularities. A doubt, therefore, could not bo entertained of the power of the Crown to interfere with the Universities ; and he only asked the Right Hon. Baronet to con sent to extend the same inquiries to the Universities of Cambridge and Oxford. It was right that the State should see that universities and colleges were provided with proper statutes and laws, and that these were properly observed. The llononrable Member - then read from an Oxford publication an extract, to show that in that University the statutes were very badly observed. One point in which the system in operation in the Universities principally differed from the system enacted, and enforced by the statute, was that the professors of the Universities who, according to the statute, w re obliged constantly to give lectures, the attendance on which was enforced by the same Acts, now formed no part of the system ; for many of them who ought to lecture gave none at all, and those who did lecture could hardly get a dozen pupils to listen to them. All the education was now conducted by college tutors, who were not controlled by the statutes. In the University of Oxford the entire education was too much restricted. He would quote the testimony of Professor Foyle, the professor of theology, who having done all in his power to obtain a class, could never muster more than six or seven pupils, and sometimes he had no pupils at all. The Right Hon. Baronet opposite could not say that that arose from his incompetency. He published a statement in a pamphlet known to the Right Hon. Ba ronet, that in two examinations in mathematics and me taphysics he found that only a small portion posseSsed the proper knowledge, not more than three being able to add vulgar fractions. In the year 1836, when an at tempt was made by a statute to increase the attendance of pupils at the different lecteres, a statement ryas pub lished by Pr. Daubeny, the profeseor of chemistry and botany in Oxford. With regard to his class in che mistry, Dr. Daubeny stated that his pupils greatly de creased in number; that for the eight years previous to the pos i ng of the statute his pupil: averaged twenty-two in number, but that during the eight years subsequent to the passing of the statute the number was decreased to fourteen, and last year they did nottomoitnttolour teen. The Honourable Gentleman thishen proceeded to read a document containing statement of Dr. Daubeny in support o tee All the proftssorg of the -4gi,. 1 e 1 . alseV ,4 . ( l ll .`i• r va seience§ emir fgrwgrci Mr. TATTON EGERTON presented several petitions against the increased grant to this establishment. NEW - SOUTH WALES. Mr. HUTT presented a petition from the Legislative Council of New South Wales, prayieg for an equalised imposition of duty on all colonial corn introduced into this country. He said that from the character of the petition which he had to bring under the notice of the House, he trusted the House would favour him with its best attention. The voice of the peti tioners, as heard through this petition to the House, came from a distance of no less than 12,000 miles across the ocean, a compass which embraced half the globe. The petitioners had heard that the House granted a remission of duty on all corn introduce d into this country from Canada, except at a nominal rate, and they conceived that it was but rig' t that all the colonial possessions of the British Crown should be placed on the same footing ; and he trusted that no invidious distinction whatever would be made with respect to them.—(Bear.) The Governor of New South Wales had received a dispatch from Lcrd Stanley, fo: bidding the imposition of any dif ferential duties on goods introduced into the colony from foreign States, and they conceived that while they were thus precluded they ought not to be placed at a disad vantage with regard to Great Britain. They had also 'and they prayed that a heard that the protection duty of la. per pound had been removeds imilarp r f o r t ocmcmight A u stralian bewtici extended to the agr i cu l tur i s t s l of New South Wales as was enjoyed in other portions of the Be mpire. Capt. OSBORNE presented a petition against the pro posed grant to Maynooth. Mr. SHAW presented a petition from Dublin com plaining of the difference of treatment. of the Established Church in England from that in Ireland. MAYNOOTII COLLEGE. Mr. ORMSBY GORE presented petitions from several places in Chestkr against. the Maynooth grant. • Colonel T. WOOD presented petitions from Islington, Hammersmith, Pimlico, Chelsea, and other places, against the grant to the College of Maynooth. Petitions to the same effect Were preynted by Sir R. Ferguson from Dover, Lord Newry from Yorkshire, Mr. B. Dennison - from the West Riding of Yorkshire, Mr. S. O'Brien from Yorkshire, Mr. Alderman Thomp son from places in Westmoreland, and Mr. T. Duaeombe from Islington and other places. Mr. HUNIE presents ql a petition fr3m Arbroath, praying that the heavy charges which are levied on British shipping for lighthouse dues may be modified and reduced. . . . Mr. MANGLES presented a petition from medical practitioners of Guildford against the Metikal Bill. Mr. C. BERKELEY presented petitions from several congregations of Wesleyan Methodists in Bristol against the grant to Maynooth. Mr. Alderman HUNIPIIF.RY presented a petition from the churchwardens and overseers of St. ()lave's, South nark, against the grant to Maynooth. Mr. BLEW ITT gave notice that he would, on the 28th of April, bring forward the motion of which he had given notice regarding tobacco. LORD ELLENBOROUGH. Mr. HLTME gave notice that he would, upon that day fortnight, move for copies of all corre,pJnd?nce con nected with the recal of Lord Ellenboroug!t. DOG-STEALING. Mr. LIDDELL gave notice that he would move for leave to bring in a Bill to prevent the offence of dog stealing —(Laughter.) LUNATIC PATIENTS. Lord ASHLEY said he would on the 24th init. move fur leave to' bring in a Bill for the care of insane pa tients. SINDF. Mr. HUME asked whether or not it was in the power of the Government to lay before the House an estimate of the revenue arising from the province of S.nde, and the expenses of maintaining that province ? Lord JOCELYN said the Government had as yet received no authentic returns on the subject. MAY NOOTH. Sir C. NAPIER said that he wished to put a question to the Right lion. Baronet at the head of her Majesty's Government. Having observed that two gentlemen who held office under the Government abstained from voting on the question of the grant to Maynooth—(ilear, hear) —he wished ts know from the Right Honourable Gentleman whether those Honourable Members were absent from accident or design ?—(Loud laughter.) He also wished to knoW whether those Honourable Gentlemen still continued to be Members of her Ma jesty's Government, and if they remained so, whether this question was to be an open question ?—(Cheers.) Sir R. PEEL said that he begged to say in reply, that he could not take upon him to say whether those Honourable Gentlemen to whom the lion. and Gallant Member referred were absent by accident or design. n o re o m f He begged to say that there was no change in the mem bershvaelrs. nooth, he considered Ma•AsttirrsesOpoeevetrtmotmnta,yand that there were that to be a Government question—(Hear, hear)—he considered it to be a question of the utmost importance. and he would do everything in his power to promote the success of it.—(Lotal Opposition cheers.) Mr. HUME said that he saw in the notice paper for to-morrow,onrby his Hon. Friend the Member for Shef field, to the effect that any provision for the purposes of education in Ireland, should be paid out of the funds ap plicable to ecclesiastical purposes, and, as it was important that they should understand how that question was to be brought forward, before they went on to the consider. ation of the Government measure, he begged to know from his Hon. Friend in what way he intended to bring on his ;notion ? Mr. HINDLEY rose to put a question before the Hon. Member for Sheffield answered the question of the Hon. Member for Montrose, bat was met with such repeated c ries of " Order, order," that the Hon. Member had to resume his seat. Mr. WARD said he felt obliged to his Hon. Friend, the Member for Montrose, for having given him notice of his question. Ile felt it necessary to give some ex planation of the course which he meant to pursue. When he gave notice of his motion, he never in tended that it should he made a rallying point for all those who wished to oppose the Government measure.—(Cheers.) Though a Member of that House for twelve years, he was not ashamed to confess that he was scandalously ignorant of the form in which the question was to be put. As he understood, th e mo ti on which the Speaker would put from the Chair in case he pressed his amendment would be—" That the words proposed to be left out stand part of the question," and in that case he had reason to believe that his amend ment would be made the point on which the Govern ment measure would be opposed.—(Hear, hear.) He had made up his mind at pres en t t o a b an d on t h e notice that stood in his name for to-morrow, in order to bring the subject before the House at a future period, with the view of getting an intelligent expression of the opinion of the House upon it. He should b e sorry if t h ey lost this mea sure, which was of great value as a boon of a conciliatory character towards Irelani. He begged to say theo shou ld bring forward his motion at a futur e period, as he wished first to have an expression of the House upon the subject. Mr. lIINDLEY wished to ask th e Right Hon. Baronet at the head of t he Governmentif this was not an addi t ional question was w hether the Right lion. Baronet wou ld delay the se cond reading of that Bill? Ile would a pp eal reason for delaying the second readi ng o f t h e Bil l. Hi s to the Speaker —(Laughter)—if the reason why lion. Members put their names to the corner of the petitions they presented was__ not to show that they had read them? They were required by the spirit of t h e orders of the house to read • ' that they might ever y petitionknow the nature of them, and explain to the louse properly the wants of their constituents. Ile could assure Hon. Members that he had bad no time to read the petitions he had rec, , ived that m orning ; he trusted that the Right Hon. B arone t would give himself, and other Hon. Members, the op portunity of discharging their duties properly. Sir R. PEEL said he had come do an to the Haase under the imp ression that the Hon. Member f o r Sheffield Tno r t . Ward) would persevere in bringi ng for ion of which he had g i ven notice, respect grant to the College of m. , * rioqq. gat though (Sirliwineagri the the Robert Peel) had just heard the Honourable Member announce his intention of postponing his motion to another stage of the Bill, still that was no reason why he should delay the second reading of the measure beyond to-morrow. However, the adopting of that course would not preclude the Honourable Member from persevering in his motion on a future day. Therefore the Lion. Member will see ,t once that there - to corroborate the statement of Dr. D time might be Governor-General of thei r Indian empire. anbeny. Dr. King, I th , professor of anat o my, s t a t e d th a t, f rom 1519 t o 1825, I He would ask of the Right Hon. Gentl eman oppoe i te 11. Pet-I), he who had emancipated the Ro wan Ca he had twenty-nine p u pil 's annually ; but from 18ee to (Sir tholies, who was now braving a perterhl opposition to 1838, they had decre as ed t o seventeen ; and since the carry out the work he had begun. by increasing the lett( r year, bad faille n off to ten. The profe s sor of ex perimental philosophy sened that his pupils had fallen grant for the education of the . Roman Catholic elerev, whether he could oppose a motion for inquiry. for I: e °fill-mu thirty-nine annually to ei g hteen. D r . Builland, only asked for that, as to the propriety and prectiee. the profs sent of ge ol eg y, s t ate d t h at, s i nce about ieee, the number of his pupils bad fallen eff nearly one-half bilks; of admioing Jews, aye, and Christian Dissenters into their national Universities?—(Cheers.) This eines less than darin g th e fifteen preceding y ears . Th e mine rates:neat class had feilen off still more. Dr. Buekland tam was different now from what it was ten years ago, stated also that the cause of this decrease was to be They had not then heard the word Puseyism—titre was sought for in the system of education pursued. He (Mr. teething of Tractarianism—no persons ventured to say Christie) made inquiry from the professors of the Uni- in the newspapers that they subscribed the articles in versity of Cambridge who were included in the annual the non-grammatical sense—there were no con- Parliamentary vote; and the result was this :—The pro- fessionals in the professors' rooms in Oxford— fessof of anatomy had six pupils, the professor of che- no rosaries and crucifixes publicly ex pose 1 in mistry had five—though the Hon. Baronet opposite (Sir the Oxford shops.—(Loud cheers.) There was 11. Inglis) knew when a hundred pupils used to attend no reason now why they should admit Dr. Newman the professor of chemistry. The mineralogy professor and refuse hr. Wiseman.—(Hear, and cheers) Then, had only five pupils, and the Jacksonian professor of how bad the Universities performed their duty in p r o. natural philosophy, one of the most distinguished muting and encouraging literature? Hew had they ful professors at that University, had only five pupil-, filled, how were they fulfilling their vecation as re el presentatives of th e nat i ona l li terature ? A luny time Tne professors of botany ( a su bj ect o f w hi c h one e ou expect that there would be a large attendance of stu• ago the literature and learning of the country were rest dente, as all candidates for medical degrees are obliged tercel in the Universities. But what had the Univerei t , attend them), can only oblige the attendance a tics done of late? Th e great wor k s of Bacon had r.- fifteen. Degrees of law a re given b y - the Universities, and mained for a long time neglected by Oxford, seal Hobbes they have the exclusive privilege of conferring spoke of the Universities, in his time, in the worst the power of' practising in the Ecclesiastical Courts, terms. ' The great Locke, after having enjoyed the eyes-- anti in the Admiralty Courts. The professor pathies and homage of the philosophers of Europe, was of civil law in Oxford is richly endowed, but driven fur his political opini. ns from his stedentship. yet no lectures upon civil law are given in that Univer- What had the Ullivcrsities to do with what wile-relied sity. This clearly appeared in evidence given before a the Augustan age of literature in England n ' While Committee of which the Right Hon. Gentleman the Scotland became remit, ned throughout Europe for her Member for Taunton was chairman. The Cambridge school of metaphysics, and while her young men bad professor of civil law does give lectures. In medicine, formed a amen which influenced the literature, also, the Universities had very i m p or t an t d u ti es to and even the Govern me nt o f th i s country, perform, and had exclusive privileges attached to the m . Fo r England remained fir behind.—(hear. hear.) Ile instance, these Universities can give the power o f pr ac ti s i ng winild only name the two person: most -distinguished in London, and seven miles round it. Oxford did not even throughout the intellectual world, fir their k now l e d ge profess to have medical students. The prof e ssors gave of and service to speculative philosophy ; and wh en h e no lectures there. The Cambridge Lectures were given, did state those names, he believed there would be no but the attendance was very small. He four d, Irons re- dispute as to the title which those gentlemen possessed to turns laid upon the table of that House, that Oxford, the high station which lie had assigned them. The first was Mr. Bailey, of Sheffi e ld, w h o , not amid the qui e t u d e during the last ten years, gave 22 degrees 4)f doctor of medicine, and 29 degrees of bachelor of medicine ; whilst of academic groves, but a m id t h e b usy di n of manufac the University of London, during the last six years, had tures, and the hurry anti bustle of a large commercial given 33 degrees of doctor of medisine, and 176 d grees town, bad written with the most eminent success on of bachelor of medicine. In the average of the last ten almost every subject of intellectual contemplation ; and had contributed work s w hi c h were surpassed by none years, Oxford had conferred only two degrees per year of doctor of medicine, and Cambridge only three. When in the language .for the comprehensiveness and the question of admitting Dissenters to that University depth of thew views.- The- other was no professor, no was first mooted, the Bishop of St. David's came forward quiet and retired student, but an active and constantly and stated that Cambridge was a theological seminary, engaged public servant, who had himself been educated and nothing more nor less than a theological seminary ; at the College of the East India Directors at Hailey and the Bishop of Durham went so far as to say, that so bury, and who was now, he believed, con fer from discouraging theology, he looked upon the ad- netted with the East India House—he meant Mr. John Mill, th e son of one of th e 'nest profound mission of Dissenters to the University as a mos t useful and beneficial rule. Then, with regard and distinguished historians that this country to Oxford, Dr. Pusey had also said that had ever produced. He did not hesitate to pronounce an attendance for a fortnight in that Uni- this culogium on the author of the " history of British vereity, without undergoing any examination what- India, ' and lie would ask what had been done by either of the Universities for hi s tory, or w h a t hi stor i ca l work ever, or any ordeal of public or p r ivate in s tr uc tion, was all that wa.s required from any ca n dida`e f o r h o ly ord ers . whatever either of them had pr o d uce d d ur i ng t h e last Long before Dr. Pusey had become such an ohject of at- three) ears, and yet neither of these gentlemen had been tack and ridicule by man y, w h o s h ou ld no t h ave f or - . connected with Oxford or Camb r id ge . A ga i n, as gotten what respect was d ue t o a m an o f hi s age an d another instance, he weuld cite that of unque s ti ona bl y learning, he made the most munificent endowments on the most profhund and learned historian of the country, one of the scholarships, Since then the Crown had whose work was an honour to England, and whose fame founded two new professorships ; and a rule was made was spread through every University in Europe, yet Dr. that the examinations should be voluntary and not corn Ling:srd was excluded from the trinversities on account pulsory. Since then three half years had elapsed, dur • or his religion. Since her accession to the throne her ing the first of which there was but one candidate ; the Majesty had visited Cambridge, and every exertion had second there was not one ; and the third there were but been made to make her M tjesty acquainted with the two; and that showed no very great encouragement to rules or College life, and to show her all the various persons to enter. When he looked at the progress that ceremonies which were gone through, in Puseyism had made in the University of Oxford, and the order to attain the several gradations of results of that progress, he could not avoid calling the eollege lif e , "smileless the authorities were anxious attention of the House to the proe, edings which to treat their illustrious guest with every respect. The had been instituted against Dr. P use y. (H ear. ) newspapers o f t h e period he well remembered had stated The Hebdomadal Board, resuscitated and reconstructed, that her Majesty had evinced, in the course of those long sat in judgment upon one of his sermons, and pro- • and tedious ceremonials, slight, but surely not unnatural flounced it heretical. The University then prohibited I symptoms of fatigue. Nor dud he wonder at it.; the him from preaching for a period of two years, He (Mr, surprise only was, that her Majesty hall at all been able Christie) wondered whether for these two years Dr, to endure them. But he thought that. the expense at. Pusey had received the income to which he was entitled. tending all this ceremonial might by this time have NT sw he thoeght these were gam] specimens of a united brought forth something more of that learning which had Church or a united University. He did notknow- in other countries been exhibited, by far more scantily en whether the Hon. Member for the University for Ox- flowed establishments. His object was to destroy the svgs.- ford, who was the great foe of Popery, was aware of the tern of narrowness and exclusion which had marked the number of conversions which had lately taken place at mode of instruction pursued at the Universities, and -to the University of Oxford. Well, if he were not, he could return to that system which had been adopted in those. tell the Right Hon. Gentleman that he held in his hand so-called, dark ages of our fathers. when those colleges a list of twenty-three parsons who had been converted, were founded, up to the time of }Awned 111. ,It slimed and who were members of the University College. BPI'. be recollected, that those colleges had been fnunded ni they could not crush Puseyism by making mar- tim e s when the Roman Catholic religion was the pro tyrs of its votaries, and he was therefore fessed religion of the State, when all the liberality, all not one of those who wished to see them deprived of the munificent liberality, had provided for the exteu their degrees. He, however, thought the effects site education of persons from all classes of society, of Puseyism in Oxford were such as ought to and as her Majesty passed through those - noble Lath, fill wish appr e h ens i on a ll t h e f r i en d s o f t h e U n i vers i ty an d ae s h e surve y e d t h ose f rette n roof's, perhaps a on both sides of the H ouse . H e h ope d to en li st on t ha t thoileht might dash across the r o y a l b reas t, t h at i n her occasion the suppo r t o f some o f t h ose G ent l emen w h o re i gn t h e system o f exc l us i on s h ou ld come to an erd, lately signed the lay address against Puseyism to the that the last blow should be given to that practice of in- Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor of the University of justice which took from those who gave the Oxford, to which the Chancellor and Vice Chancellor. endowments for purposes which those donors never made the satisfactory reply, that Puseyism did not eontemplated. On those grounds, he trusted be exist to the serious extent that some persons appeared should be allowed the indulgence of the *House, and we t s, to imagine In the Universities distinctions were those views he would leave the question in their hands. msintained with respect to rank. In the University The lion.. Gentleman sat down amidst loud and con of Cambridge, all plebeians were required to wait tinued cheering. at least seven years before they could obtain a master Mr. EW ART said that his Honourable Friend ef arts' degree ; hut a Nobleman's sot, and had truly said that the question a hich he hail subs all persons having any royal blood in their mitted to the House was now in a very similar po. veins, were allowed to take - the same. master's sition to that in which it stood a few years ago, and be degree, after three years, as if there was a noble thought the House ought to give its consent to the mo road to learning. Now, he should think, that these tion of his Hon. Friend, on account of the fact that the were the very persons who could best afford a larger Universities hal departed from the system on whicie time to devote to college- education. They cer- they were founded, end he could truly say, that the plan tainly were the persons whose education was which had been adoeted in the time of Edward 111. was the object of national consideration, for from those more comprehensive in its character than that on which persons came all their future hereditary legislators. In they acted now, and he thought that unless a Com. all Colleges, in both Universities, distinctions of gown, mission were issued for the purpose of obteining a more of table, and of seats, in the Colleen , Chapel, were ac • extensive system of aeadernical education, the purpose's. ceded to rank and birth. At Cambridge a Noble- of the University would he almost entirely lost. If they man in his own right, or a Nobleman's son, Was entitled looked at the two Universities,. they would s ee that the to wear a full flowing black silk gown, which, on grand systems pursued were of a most exclusive character. In days, he exchanged for a fine gown of purple and gold. the University of ( Weed the attention of the professors After this gown, which had cost six or seven guineas, was turned chiefly to classical literature, and in the had been worn six or seven times by hi m , i t b ecame t h e o th er to methentaties. But how diflarent sees the system perquisite of the tutor. The Nobleman on all occasions pursued in former times. In those time the course of took precedence in the College Hall and Chamber. There education had comprised instruction in no less than was an officer in both Universities, whose duty it Was, seven sciences. This course was called the tritium and when a Nobleman was introduced into the University, retrivium, and together constituted what was termed to deliver a laudatory address to him, in praise of his curriculum, through which the students run to attain ancestors. He (Mr. Christie) should have thought that to a full competence for their future duties. But in Ox in such places as the Universities distinctions such as ford and Cambridge the principle appeared to be to these would not have been allowed. But no, there carry a student up to a certain amount of elementary might they see— information, and then left him to gain instruction as " The learned pate duck to the golden fool." best he might, when he came to fulfil any duty in that At the time that he and his Hon. Friend below him, the House, or in any other part of the country. It was not Member for Dundalk (Mr. Reddington), were fellow- to the Universities of Oxford or Cambridge that they commoners in Cambridge, he was compelled to go to must look for any useful or learned works, but to the chapel only every Sunday, while the other undergra- Universities of Germnay, for .he believed it was a well duates were obliged to go there seven or eight times.— known fact, and he believed that, notwithstanding the (Hear, hear.) It was well known that the statutes were smile which he saw on the countenance of the Hew. violated almost at pleasure. When the question was Member for Cambridge (Mr. Manners Sutton), he might brought forward, in 1837, in the House of Lords, a pro- state that there were no works used in the educational miss was given to him by the two Chancellors of the course at Cambridge, whether they treated on Universities, in consequence of Lord Radnor's exposure, the profound points of Greek or of history, that they would direct the attention of the colleges to which were not either entirely translated or the statutes, with a view to their reformation. Ile be- at least derived from the German. The whole of the lieved that the Chancellors had done their duty, and system pursued at Cambridge went on the tutorial plan, made representations to the colleges, the consequence of and lie believed he should be justified in the assertion which was that five of the colleges in Cambridge had re- that this system could not be altered until they reverted formed their statutes, but no revision took place in the to the system on which these colleges had been founded, Oxford statutes at all. It was well known also that those Mr. Whewel himself, one of the most distinguished colleges had been founded for the benefit of po o r members of the University, had stated it as his opinion, scholars, that they might devote themselves to the study that it was absolutely necessary to revert to the proles of theology, and not for the rich. But the advantages sorial plan, if they meant to do the students, the Univer they held forth were enjoyed by the rich,and with regard sity or the country justice, and to give the younw rr.gert to the study of theology he had already stated how that who came to them for instruction that which was iseedeci branch of study was neglected. In Exeter College, Ox- fur their future lives. On those two grounds he should ford, there was a provision that after a certain number of support the motion of his lion. Friend—first, because the years a fellow should either take holy orders or resign. Universities had departed from the 'plan en which they There was another provision, that after a ce rt a i n further were founded, and it was necessary to proceed on a more number of years, he should take the degree of 1).1). extensive system than now prevailed ; and, secondly., Now a fellow of Trinity College had an application because they had not produced men equ a l to those who made to him, e ith er t o take holy orders or to resign. had been educated in other nations. Ile might adduce He said, why require me to do this, when there are so only Heithorne and Muller in Germany, as fair examples many others who have neglected to take the degree of of modern times, and Guizet in France. Notwithstand- D.D. He appealed to the Bishop of Winchester, who ing the ironical exclamations with which this questenn told him that he must either go into holy ordersor resign had been formerly treated, he believed the House mend kis fellowship. From another provision in the statutes now take a different view of it, and that, if the Hon. of Trinity College, it appeared that the founder Gentleman opposite thought that he had a menwity with had an objection to the aristocracy, and cape- him in that House, he felt quite sure that the majority cially desired that no fellowship should be held were against him in the country. On most ley a young member of a noble family, (kectionable usage too, in the Universities, was Well, a vacancy in a scholarship had occurred in Trinity the distinction observed between the diff erent ranks College, and it was filled up by the nephew and heir-at- The noblemen and fellow commoners were tlikerentiv law of the Earl of Buckingharoshirk s .—(Year, hear.) ln robed and differently served from those of other rade_ ~ 1842 an election took place for a vacant fellowship in and a distinction was thus created which w as odious to the f e elings of the country and revolting to his own`; awd he Exeter College, and as was usual on such occasions, ad tinction wa , s made h between them and students in the same vertiscanents appeared in the Oxford papers, requiring wombd ask why, because a man was simply a sizer at candidates to give in their names, and to send testimo- Cambridge or a servitor at Oxford, why this invidious dis promotion of reliious feeling dis nials. Mr. Rowe and two others became candidates. One of the two, however, su b sequen tly w ithd rew . Mr. R o w e University. But the most important of all questions tes_imo- than the system of exclusion which and the other candidate were examined, and upon the is the i Universities was the day of election it was announced to the surprise of every c : ;in h e e a country. Now, in his opinion, nothing could be body, and even the candidates themselves, that another t greater ohstaele to the promotion of that feeling person, who bad not sent in his name or and was adopted at both Isiah, who had not been examinednwas electe .—(near, he Universities, and he did conceive that this great ob hear.) Mr. Rowe, feeling that it might be supposed ,jest would be better promoted by opening the Univer- there was some imputation on his character, determined cities to the admission of students from other creeds and and if not by introduction into the colleges already esta te appeal to the visitor—the Bishop of Exeter. Of cours e sects than those connected with the Church of England, of Wished that an opening would be made sy the erection Of it was important that the statutes of Exeter College ruelifeulleyGiPnYthe other colleges for . that purpose. Ills Hon. Friend might copy, not succeed on this occasion, a th h e e m uld in b e e x i i n s s t p en ec e t e e , d a , nd bu t t hat the w re ss w k as ept onl e y a • and on a se time would rme when he w b o u u College. The Bishop wrote for the t ld he se f e el t t h a e s s s e u u re n d but he only received extracts, Universities cond cond application, he received only further extracts opened, with a request that they would be sent back. The Bishop but the an when he would have not only a majority whole of the House with him, and with the state.. gave judgment, but it appeared that his power did not meat f • extend beyond requiring that the candidate should be of .o this conviction he would second the motion. a certain age and standing, and Mr. Rowe • raised no with which the Hon. Member had brought this subjectobjections upon those points. There could be no objec tion to Mr. Rowe in point of moralsbefore the 'louse ;and thowsh he dissented from many s. or learning; the successful candidate anoptedpeculiar but of his facts, anti differed from all his conclusions, he yet theological questions, which found sentiments on must lew his testimony to the great ability with which Exeter College. On the very same great favour in the matter had been introduced. At the commencement took place for another clay another election of his speech the Hon. Gentleman had promised that he elected who had no college t fellowship, and an individual was would say nothing disrespectful of the learned bodies of estunonials, and who could those Universities of which he was about to speak. not get any because he ' ' 'was rusticated. This question 'Phis promise he (Sir H. Inglis) felt bound to say he had was very different in 1841 from; ..c what it was when brought most faithfully kept, for in the whole course of his speech forward ten years ago. 1. o less a person than the Lord there was not a word that could be construed into insulter Chancellor of a o Government for which the Hon. B aronet refle c ti on on those learned bodies. He (Sir R, Inglis) the Member for Oxford if ha was not • a very warm sup- was at the same time bound to express his acknowledg porter of it, bad a very decided preference, held out as *tents for the courtesy which he had experienced at the an example of what an enlightened .Government ought — the and he ' • d find hands of Hon, Gentleman, to. be — the example of P russ i a, w h ere Jews were ad- that he had been more fortunate this year than he. bed nutted on equal terros.—(llear, hear.) But the Lord been last, and that he was sueovssful in his iuteeductiore Chanceltor need not have gone so far, for he might have of the question on the first ocea.shew ' in which pointed to the East India College, of which he had attempted to briuw i t b e fore the, the Bi s h o p o f L ondon was visitor, and eler- House ; end he must re s ee' that opportunity gymen of the Church of England the pro- of expeessin,, , e his theist...), and he thought he might say lessors, where Jews were admitted an d ed vk e e iad, the thanks o'th: he learne d b o dies to whom allusion _had and where they were amongst the rimes distinguished been re.' moderation and calmness which had . for the a, h• But with that, his commen scholars.--( Hear, hear2i Through the liberality of the e' euareterised his speec . East redia Beater (he Wished that C a h u h r id ge es.' - of that speech must conclude. He (Sir R. e Ox- dstien s deemed guilty of filed - would fellow their example), a JP''' . - '.. trusted that. lie should not be highs) in. . to the Sureme . 99tiew of v'''' ' .. might now rise rising first i n opposition to the motion, in no very long presumption ...eia, and