The Sun. — London, England, 1836-11-25 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. Madrid Journals of the 16th contain a decree de priving Rodil of his command. The letters which accompany these journals state that he has refused to obey the order first conveyed to him, and that he is de termined to retain his command. If this be the case, he must be got rid of after the Turkish fashion. In the midst of this the Cortes are as mild as if it were the golden age. Strange how things go by contraries in Spain. The Cortes and its opposition elected un der the Estatuto was furious and imperative, while the assembly elected by the democratic system of 1812 is certainly the best conducted and least revolutionary that Spain has vet seen. It is to be regretted indeed, that they are so calm. In a moment so critical they ought not to have shrunk from sending commissioners to the army. And we fear much that the civil and administrative authority in Spain must strike a blow ere military men will exert themselves to do the same. If Rodil be not punished, his successor cannot respect the Liberal Government, but must look, as Rodil did, to Don Carlos. One has but to read the admirable letter of our Correspondent to perceive how feeble a foe Gomez must have proved, if seriously attacked, whilst, from his conversation with Flinter, it ap- pears how fully the Carlist depredator relies upon the inactivity of the Christinos. There are no finer troops than the 20,000 now under Alaix, Narvaez, and Ro- rtteay:bs ~ , .., . • . . IriF iiinerdi '`,,,:-, ,-_-:/-ild,sli*-titia': ij ~~ did ; yet, through -treason, Gomez with 3,000 soldiers, and 6 or 7,000 ragamuffins, is able to occupy and be fool the overwhelming force of the Queen, leaving the precious strong holds of liberalism in the north, not as Bilboa, to the mercy of the enemy. The treason is rank, and must have the fitting remedy. France may ..ave stained the career of her first revolution with blood, but it at least was not spilled in vain. She tri umphed. It will be a terrible lesson for history if it should be proved that revolutions cannot succeed with out being ruthless. Espinosa, Captain-general, left Cordova with all the forces which could be disposed of, to dispute the passage of Sierra Morena against the Carlists. We know nothing more positive as to the road taken by Gomez since his arrival at Berlanga oe the 7th. A bagagero or carrier, who marched dur ing eight days with the troops of Gomez, relates that their equipages were organised in three brigades of two hundred mules each, carrying the ammunition, the mountain cannon, the provisions, the booty, the wounded and the weary. There are a hundred mules loaded with guns, and ten mules laden with gold .or silver. The number of men which march with the division and receive provisions amounts to more than 12,000 men, comprehending the muleteers, &c. ; the number of horses and beasts of burden pass 2,000. 'When this column is obliged to cross the mountains by one road, its length is of three or four leagues. One m ay see by these details what advantages the generals of the Queen, if they had more activity, could take of the Carlists, embarrassed with so great a quantity of baggage, by attacking the long column of the enemy, or in surpriing it by a night attack in its disordered encampments. Bilboa continues to hold out. It is said that the besieged have made a vigorous sally, in which they have had the advantage. General Espar tero, after a long circuit, has arrived near Portugalet with 18,000 men. Villareal has retired from Sodupe to the heights of Alonzo Tegui, near Bilboa ; he ap pears to establish himself to cover the scige, and re ceive the attack of the constitutional army. If Espar tern has not arrived ta disengage the place besieged before the 19th or 2,oth of November, it would be forced to capitulate ; all the exterior works are taken, and the body of the place is composed of fortifications which have been thrown up during the present war, to resist a coup de main, and not a formal siege.—illorn ing Chronicle. Some of Mr. Daniel O'Connell's aphorisms upon Poor Laws are not the least amusing productions of that learned person's genius. He tells us that there is no country in which the introduction of a general poor law " has not led to an increase of pauperism." Does he know anything about the state of England before the Poor Law of Elizabeth, as compared with what it was afterwards, and has been since ? We apprehend nut. When challenged by an individual with the instances of England and Holland, Mr. O'Connell said not one word upon the alleged increase of pau perism in the former country ; and respecting the latter he made the extraordinary bounce, that pauperism in Holland had been increased by the poor law just 426 per cent. ! or in other words 426 paupers created for 100 that had existed before ! But next comes the panacea—the genuine O'Connell poor law—and what is that ? Why, reader, it is nothing less than that undefinable something which he calls " justice to Ireland ;" the meaning of which is, do nothing for the poor, literally nothing ; but add to their number by starving the Protestant clergy—make the Popish priests lords paramount of the municipal corporations—leave the multitude to the tender mercies of a system of artificial turbulence—help the agitator to excite an annual fever, which shall come to its crisis from the middle of November to Christmas, and be cooled by copious bleedings under ,the name of an O'Connell rent. Do all this, and you administer in its happiest form the nostrum on whose label is written " Justice to Ireland 1" and 10, pauperism is at once annihilated, demoralization purified, lawful authority established and respected, and life and property secured. The rest of the O'Connell oration was made up of a laudable attempt to prove that all the secret conspiracies and consequent crimes of Papist ruffians were the work of Orange instigators ; and he proceeds to the demand of short Parliaments, Universal Suffrage, and the Bal lot, to the merits of which last species of political per fectibility he offers this characteristic testimonial—viz., that " a man might hurrah for West and Hamilton outside the Court ; and he might, when he got to the balloting box, votefor Daniel O'Connell ! ! 1 English men, this is no invention of ours ; it is the portrait of the Ballot, painted by its own advocate—" Hurrah for one candidate, and vote for his antagonist I" If this does not make a convert of an honest man like Mr. Grote, then have we lost all key to human character.— Times. The Tory prints have of late been loudly chuckling over what they are pleased to call their success at the recent municipal elections for England. The instances in which they have been numerically successful have, as was to be expected from a faction so reckless and loose in their statements of facts, been greatly exag gerated. And i n t h ose cases w h ere t h ey rea ll y h ave had a gain over the Reformers, the circumstance can easily be accounted for without being driven to the adoption of the hypothesis that liberal principles are now less popular than th e y were at t h e per i o d o f t h e previous elections. But our present purpose is not to go into a detail i of the circ umstances w hi c h h ave con spired in some instances to enable the Tories to obtain an ascendancy in the Town Councils of several bo roughs in England. Our object is to ask the Tory or gans either in the metropolis or the provin ces , h ow comes it to pass that when they have of late devoted so much of their space to a celebration of their triumphs —fancied and real—in the Town Councils of Eng land, they have maintained an unbroke n s il ence as to the results of the elections i n the Town Coun cils of Scotland ? As we have but little expec tation of receiving an answer to our question from the Conservative Journals, it may not be amiss to answer it ourselves. The reason, then, is just this :—ln Scotland, the elections have, with one single exception, gone against them. The instance to which we refer is that of the Town Council of Inver ness. In that solitary case the Tories have triumphed. But how ? Because Liberal principles are being gradually supplanted in the metropolis of the High lands by those of a Conservative complexion ? There never was a more unfounded supposition. And none know better than the Tories themselves of that place, that such a supposition has not even the shadow of a ground to rest on. The temporary triumph—for it is only temporary—of the Conservatives in the Town Council of Inverness, is wholly owing to the jobbing, bungling mode of doing business, and everlasting squabbling among themselves of a few persons who have hitherto assumed the title of Whigs, but who have proved rank Conservatives in their conduct, N l'init r oti in their hearts. It is to the mismanage ' - , Qe. treachery of these persons—treachery, we 'gards the principles they professed at the last municipal election for Inver fon the credit of which they received es of the inhabitants—it is to this THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1836. treachery and mismanagement that the fact of the Tories having obtained an ascendancy in the Town Council of Inverness is to be ascribed. These pretended Reformers—men with Whiggism on their lips, while Toryism is rampant in their hearts—are precisely that class of persons who, of all others, the friends of li beral principles ought to dread, and against whom they ought to be specially on their guard. We scarcely ever yet knew an instance in which the Reform cause was defeated, in which such persons had not more or less to do with that defeat. Their conduct in Inverness so disgusted the Reformers in that borough, that many of them determined on having nothing to do with the late municipal election. Several of the stanchest friends of liberal principles abstained from voting alto gether, and thus the Tories may be said to have walked the course. Perhaps the genuine Reformers of Inverness, if they saw no chance of being able, under existing circumstances, to return to the Town Council men of the right sort, acted wisely in abstaining from voting at all. We ourselves, in such a case, would much rather have downright Tories, than sham Re formers. The Conservatives of Inverness are, we understand, about to start a new paper in that town. It is to be of the " ingenious device" school in its theo logical opinions ; in other words, it is to be established by the O'Sullivan, M'Ghee, and Crotty party in the North. One would have thought that the Journal is in all conscience Tory enough. •So it is, we doubt not, even in the estimation of the party starting the new paper, is so far as politics are concerned ; but, then, the Journal unfortunately knows nothing more about polemical theology, than it does about the mu nicipal institutions—if there be any—of Timbuctoo. The new Tory Inverness print is to go the " whole hog" in polemical religion, after the fashion of the Exeter Hall performers. It may live twelve months ; it certainly will not survive eighteen. Before then it will be said of it, as it has been of many journals be fore it—" it died, and made no sign."—Morning Advertiser. The defence put forth by the Ministerial Papers for the conduct of the Archbishop of Dublin, in prevent ing the Rev. Mr. Nolan from preaching in his diocese, although licensed by Archdeacon Magee to use the pulpit of the church of which he is incumbent, is wholly inconsistent with that which was volunteered by a Conservative Evening print to which we alluded yesterday, and which, if it correctly stated the ground of the archiepiscopal inhibition, would have re lieved Dr. Whatcly from the charge of having silenced a Protestant clergyman, lest his sermons might prove an offence and a stumbling-block to the Church of Rome. It appears Dr. Whatelv's friends by no means adopt a line of defence thus proferred upon technical grounds—they boldly, and we must add, honestly, admit that the Archbishop's objections to the Rev. Mr. Nolan were substantial and personal, and not at all technical. These objections may be summed up by stating that Mr. Nolan was a Ro man Catholic, and ig a Protestant—was a clergy man of the Church of Rome, and is a clergyman of the Church of England—and that, having given offence to Rome, by abjuring its faith, and continuing to give offence by preaching against its errors, lie had disqualified himself . from preaching in any pul , pit within the extent of Dr. Whately's episcopal jurisdiction. It is said by a Ministerial print that the facts of the unpleasant and irritating effects of Mr, Nolan's preaching upon the theological sensibilities o! Roman Catholics, were communicated to the Irssl Government, and no doubt that Was so, and we have it upon the same authority that, " as the Archbishop of Dublin is a member of the Privy Council, it is not unlikely that his Grace obtained official knowledge of the mischief which Mr. Nolan's renegado zeal edocted in another province and archiepiscopal see." Here we see the advantage of an Archbishop being a member of the Privy Council, at least of such a Privy Council as is presided over by the wisdom of a Mulgrave, and enlightened by the genius of a ..Morpeth. He was thus enabled to hear of the misconduct of Protestant clergymen who are daring enough in these days to preach in Ireland the principles of the Reformation, and who add to that delinquency the still greater one of being converted members of the Church of Rome— a guilt which they share in common with all the early Reformers, many of whom were punished for that guilt still more severely than Mr. Nolan has yet been— having expiated, by fire and faggot, the crime of read ing the Bible and expounding its doctrines to the people. To be sure it is somewhat difficult to discover how the preaching of Air. Nolan in the pulpit of St. John's Church could shake the nerves or shock the notions of a Roman Catholic congregation, inasmuch as his au (hence would have been a Protestant one ; and Roman Catholics, in Ireland at least, are not in the habit of attending heretical places of worship. If Protestants went to a Roman Catholic place of worship and heard what they did not like to hear, as most likely they should, the answer to their complaints would be " What brought you there ? who compelled you to go and listen to what you did not like to hear ?" It is the duty, we should think, of a Roman Catholic cler gyman, even though he be a converted Protestant, like a certain member of a noble family, to preach to his congregation according to the doctrines of his Church—to denounce heresy including all Pro testant tenets, and to warn the flock against all Pro testant expounders of the Scriptures, as ensnarers of the faithful and blind guides in the path that leads to perdition. It might not be agreeable to Protestants to hear their faith and their ministers so described, though we believe it would not provoke any of them to acts of " anarchy, outrage, and bloodshed." They would not be Protestants if they so imitated the un christian spirit—the ruffian violence of a Tuam mob— adorers of a Machale and persecutors of a Nolan— " Proving their doctrine orthodox By apostolic blows and knocks." It being, then, the duty of a Roman Catholic clergy man, as long as he continues to believe in the dogmas of the " infallible and immutable Church," to de nounce heresy—and to show by force of controversial preaching, if he can, that out of the pale of the Church of Rome there is no salvation—what right, we ask, would Protestants have to obtrude themselves among, his congregation, to raise a disturbance, insult or mal treat the preacher, and exhibit the zeal of their most Christian piety with all the fury of the most savage intolerance ? What right would Protestants have to surround a place of Roman Catholic worship, placed under the protection of the law, smash the windows, fling stones and other missiles in amongst the con gregation, and threaten to take the life of the preacher ? If any Protestant could so act, we are sure a truly Protestant Government would not invert the order of justice in such a case—that is, arrest the preacher, and let the malefactors go free. But Dr. Delaney was arrested, as Mr. Nolan has been silenced, to gratify the aggressors, to conciliate the violators of the law, and to save that many headed guardian of Papal purity, a ferocious mob, from the trouble of exhibiting their zeal in acts of " anarchy, outrage, and bloodshed." But after all, the silencing of an eloquent and powerful preacher of the doctrines of the Reformation in one diocese, will be of little avail unless he can be silenced in all. Perhaps the time is drawing near when that prohibi tory process may be extended by his Majesty's Irish Privy Councillors to the whole of Ireland. An arrest of a Protestant clergyman here, and an inhibition of another there, is but a piecemeal and imperfect way of makin g it understood that a Papal ascendancy must be acknowledged in Ireland even before that country becomes " great, glorious, and free," by a repeal of the Union. The most mode of practisedsilencing preachers of the by such apostoli c Prelatesas Bishops Bonner and was that Gardiner. The Papal crusade against Protestant c l er gymen in the nineteenth century is yet but young ; it is not older than the " healing measure"—the , it tran quillizing Bill of 1829 • yet w an t s th e fi n i s h e d prac tice of the elder days of persecution • ; it may improve as it goes on ; and, as Ireland is rapidly filling with monastic institutions, .so it may b e bl esse d w i t h t h e appropriate accompaniment of Holyal •• • Inquisition.— Morning Herald. We insert a letter from Mr. O'Connell to the people of Ireland, on the subject of the late run upon the banks in that country. The object of this epistle seems to be to persuade the people that it is a very foolish thing to make a run upon banks, and more especially upon joint-stock banks, and still more especially upon the National Bank of Ireland, "of which," says Mr. O'Connell, "I am Governor." There may be some peculiarity in the character of the Irish people, dispos ing them to obey the admonition conveyed in Mr. O'Connell's address. But there is no doubt that in England, as in most other countries, such a letter, from the governor of a bank, instead of preventing or check ing a run, would create or increase it, particularly if the letter-writing governor should resemble Mr. O'Con nell in all points, and take care also, like him, to say, " Every shilling of property I have in the world, all the property of my eldest son and his family, all the property of my son-in-law, is involved as security for the notes of the National Bank." There is a natu ral tendency in mankind to distrust counsel with which selfish and family interests are so closely connected. Taking all circumstances into view, there is some thing highly amusing in the assumption of Mr. O'Connell, that people ought to have unqualified and unbounded confidence in the notes of a bank because he has a share in conducting it. We venture to say that Mr. O'Connell is the only banker in existence by whom, and Ireland the only country in the world in which, such a passage as we are about to quote could have been produced :—" I did, indeed, think that the people of Ireland ought, of themselves, to have shown their confidence in me, and, to have testified their conviction that I would not be one to circulate amongst them any paper which would cause any loss or injury to any body." Whatever may be Mr. O'Connell's faults, it is evident that an excess of modesty is not of the number. Mr. O'Connell, however, has so long played upon large classes of his countrymen, and with so much success, that he may be presumed to understand his instrument. It is probable, therefore, that his address may in some degree produce its in tended effect. Should it do so, there will be rea son to regret that it was deferred until a rival bank to that of Mr. O'Connell had been compelled to sus pend its payments in consequence of a run, which that gentleman now pronounces to have been wholly gratuitous and irrational. We must remark, in con clusion, that for a gentleman who is the founder and one of the managers of an extensive and important bank of issue, Mr. O'Connell seems, from the whole tenor of his letter, to be lamentably ignorant of the relation which subsists between such establishments and the community. The public have a right to ex pect, not merely that these banks shall be solvent, but that they shall be at all times ready to pay. A com mercial man may be utterly ruined, a poor man and his family may undergo the severest privations, in con sequence of a delay of payment, although no eventual loss be incurred. And where delay is apprehended it is natural, and it is right, that each holder of notes should try to get first served ; or, in other words, that there should be a run. With competing banks d issue, unrestrained as to amount, except by their own considerations of self-interest, the apprehension of a run is the only check by which excessive issues and a mischievous depreciation of the general currency of the country can be prevented. Mr. O'Connell's admoni tion to the people of Ireland is, in effect, to relieve all banks of which the solvency is undoubted from this salutary apprehension.---Morning Post. COURT OF COMMON COUNCIL Yesterday a Court was held pursuant to a requisition for the consideration of a motion to direct the City Cham berlain to pay the sum of 5001. out of the City's cash, in aid of the Metropolitan Church Building Fund, and to elect masters for the City of London School. The LORD NitiYoll., upon taking the chair, addressed the Court at considerable length upon the subject of the nature of the duties which he should in his mayoralty have to perform. All that was in his power should be done to facilitate discussion, for he had experienced the value of discussion during the time he had held a seat in the Court of Common Council.—(Cheers.) THANKS TO THE LATE LORD MAYOR. Deputy WESTON rose to move a vote of thanks to the late Lord Mayor. Deputy PEACOCK seconded the motion, and declared that he never knew a better public or private man. Mr. R. TAYLOR could not help rising to give his hearty concurrence in the vote. _ vv The motion was then carried unanimously. VOTE TO THE LATE LORD ➢fAYOR AS CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COURT. The Chairman of the General Purposes Committee brought up the report on the subject of the most advisable mode of testifying to the late Lord Mayor the sense enter tained by the Court of his Lordship's conduct as Chairman of the whole Court on the municipal institutions of the city of London. It recommended that a piece of plate of the value of 501. should be presented to the late Lord Mayor, with an inscription adapted to the occasion. The Chairman moved that the Court should agree with the Committee in their report. Under-Sheriff WIRE did not anticipate any objection to the report of the Committee. He should propose that the value of the plate should be 100/.—(Hear, hear.) The amendment was withdrawn, and the original motion was carried unanimously amidst cheers. VOTE TO THE METROPOLITAN CHURCH BUILDING FUND, The LORD MAYOR informed the Coutt that he bad re ceived a requisition, numerously signed, on the subject of voting a sum of money for the building of Churches. The requisition was then read. It was signed by be tween fifty and sixty members, whose names were all read. Deputy CORNET , rose to move that a sum of money should be granted in aid of the fund just mentioned. The motion that 5001. be paid to the metropolitan fund being then put, Alderman SciioLEv seconded the motion. Mr. JOHNSON considered the motion to be injudicious and unreasonable.—( Hear, hear.) After some further ob servations, Mr. Johnson moved the previous question, as an amendment. Mr. LAURENCE seconded the amendment. Mr. BOURNE was a Dissenter, but would support the grant. Sir P. LAURIE regretted that the question was brought forward, but was determined to vote for it. The Church of England at present appeared to be more popular than ever, and he knew of four chapels which had lately been made into churches according to fhe established religion. Mr. RICHARD TAYLOR strongly opposed the grant. He could trace to the pockets of the high dignitaries of the Church the enormous sums which ought to be applied to far different objects. He ridiculed the name of voluntary churches, and asked what, if they were give their money, they would get in return ? The Bishop would either have the appointment of the veto, which amounted to the same thing. Mr. ANDERTON could not vote for the grant without consulting his constituents. After some observations from Mr. Stevens and Mr:Wire against the grant, and Mr. R. L. Jones, Mr. Fletcher, and Mr. Williams in favour of it, the Court divided, when the grant of .5001. was carried by a majority of 10, the numbers being for the grant, 111 ; against it, 101. The Court adjourned to this day, when the election of the trustees of the City of London School will take place. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Nor. 24. IN RE LADY KIRKWALL. Mr. RICHARDS applied in this matter for an order to the Master to review his report on the claim of a medical gen tleman, who had attended Lady Kirkwall, and held her bond for 185/. The lunacy had rendered the bond of no avail, and the Master refused to admit it ; but if the order was now obtained, it would save the expense of taking ex ception to the report. Mr. ELLISON, for the Committee, consented to any order his Lordship might think proper. The LORD CHANCELLOR declined to make any order on the subject. IN THE MATTER OP LYON, A LUNATIC. Sir W. HORNE appeared in support of a petition in this case, praying that no further proceedings may be taken on the finding of the jury until the lunatic has an opportu nity of collecting witnesses abroad, and bringing them to England, in order to disprove the evislence given in support of the lunacy. His Lordship would perceive there were two petitions before him, one to stay the further proceedings, and the other for the appointment of a committee of the person and estate. The petition on which the Learned Coun sel appeared was the joint petition of the alleged lunatic and his wife, and it stated that Mr. George Lyon, formerly of St. John's-wood, Regent's Park, and recently a resident at Nice, had been found a lunatic in August last, under an inquisition held at the Gray's Inn Coffee-house, in London. Now this inquisition was a pure exparte proceedinc , behind the back of the party most deeply interested in the result, without even the assistance of a counsel to cross-examine the witnesses, whose testimony, it was clear to every one, was of the most suspicious character. Mr. Lyon at the present moment, was about thirty-three years of age. He was the youngest of four sons of an eminent merchant of the city of London, and entitled to the interestof a fund in Court which produced 500/. a-year, and which was regu larly remitted through the agency of a banker, after being paid by the Accountant-General. Mr. Lyon had recently visited Egypt, from whence he passed to Italy, and after wards toMarseilles, where it was alleged he first showed symp- toms of insanity. The evidence in support of this was a res• taurateur, his chef de cuisine, and a doctor, all of whom were brought to this country to support the commission. Now drun kenness was not insanity, and both the restaurateur and the doctor thought so, for both ran up long bills with Mr. Lyon, and in that respect treated him as perfectly sane. One effect of the proceedings was yet to be mentioned— Mr. Lyon married a French lady, whose cjiaracter was per fectly unimpeachable, in July, 1835, and the verdict of the Jury, finding him lunatic in May, would have the effect of dissolving that marriage. Now, in opposition to the evidence in support of the commission, there was the deposition of the medical gentleman at present attending on Mr. Lyon at Nice, and he swore distinctly that Mr. Lyon was perfectly sane. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, all that could be done would be to allow both petitions to stand over for a reason able time, in order to give Mr. Lyon an opportunity of coming to this country, with such witnesses as he thought would meet the case made against him; and in the mean time an order would be made, directing a reference to the Master to approve of a fit person to act as committee of the person of the lunatic. ROLLS' COURT, Nor. 24. DEAN V. LONG. In this case two petitions were presented—one for the usual confirmation of the Master's report, making a settle ment of certain property, and the other from the father of an infant, praying for an allowance out of the property of his late wife. The father married in contempt a ward of Court, and pending the proceedings in the Master's office the wife died, leaving issue one child. The Master by his report had settled the fortune of the wife upon herself for life, with remainder to her issue, with a power of assign ment. By the Learned Counsel on behalf of the father it was argued that though the wife had died without making an assignment in favour of her husband that was no reason to suppose that she would not have done so if she had lived. Besides, the settlement which the Master had made, ex cluding the father from all participation in his late wife's income, would attach a kind of stigma upon him, which it would be extremely difficult to remove. Mr. K. PARKER appeared in support of the petition for the confirmation of the report ; and Mr. KINDERSLEY in support of the petition of the father. His Lordship the MASTER of the ROLLS said that, upon the best consideration which he could give to this case, he should confirm the Master's report, and by this means de prive the father, who was guilty of contempt, from touch ing one farthing of this property. He should merely grant the prayer of the one petition, and dismiss the father, with costs. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nor. 24. THE KING V. BRIGHTWELL. _ This was a rule for a quo warranto to be directed to the defendant, calling on him to show cause by what authority he claimed to exercise the office of Alderman of the city of Norwich. The affidavits on which the rule was founded stated that at the election of Aldermen in 1835 there were 16 names propoSed together ; that an amendment proposing other names was rejected on a division, and then the whole 16 were put and-voted for in a lump ; and the Court had granted the rule on these affidavits, and on the authority of the case of the King v. Munday, which declared voting in the lump in this way to be illegal. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL now showed cause against the rule. Sir W. FOLLETT contended that the law of the case was clearly in favour of the application.—Rule absolute. THE ICING V. PHILLIPS. Mr. CRESSWE LI, moved for a criminal information against the defendant. From the affidavits on which the rule was founded, it appeared that the defendant had held some situation in a Railw. y Company with Mr. Richardson was connected as secret try. The defendant had ceased to be connected with the Company, and in the belief that that cir cumstance had arisen from Mr. Richardson's conduct he, in a paper, which he circulated, accused that gentleman of having caused his dismissal, because he would " not lend him self to a fraud," and of having counterfeited his (Phillips's) handwritinr , in certain bankers' books, so that the bankers had required Phillips to give them, for their protection, his genuine signature. The paper also insinuated that Mr. Richardson strutted in diamonds, gold chains, &c., from the funds of the Agricultural Labourers' Employment Society. All these accusations and insinuations Mr. Richardson positively denied.—Rule granted. THE KING V. ROBINS, LUCAS, AND DIMMS. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL applied for a rule for a cri minal information against the defendants, the writer, prin ter, &c. of a bill containing libellous itnputations•against Sir S. Whalley. That gentleman was the chairman of the London Junction Railway Company, and on the 14th of September there had been a meeting of the Company. On that occasion he had made a statement to the Company which was perfectly satisfactory, and he received the thanks of the meeting. Shortly afterwards the libel he complained of appeared. It was stated that he had been a servant in the employment of Sir Jonathan Mills at his madhouse, a statement which Sir S. Whalley, in his affidavit, most po sitively denied, declaring that he had never been a servant there, nor at any other madhouse whatever, and that he had never been employed in that or any other business. The libel then went on to state that he had at this meeting spoken of delivering a check to Lucas ; that he had never delivered any check of the kind stated to Lucas, as Mr. Wilson, Mr. Richardson, and others could distinctly prove. The gen tleman thus appealed to had, with Sir S. Whalley, made affidavits, dietinetly declaring that he did deliver the check in question to Lucas.—Rule granted. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Nor. 24. EAN%OM AND ANOTHER V. DUNDAS. Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD and Mr. HILL showed cause against a rule which had been obtained by Mr. Sergeant Wilde for setting aside the judgment, or for amending it, by striking out so much as related to the costs. The mere question was, whether judgment ought to be entered up for the costs as well as for the sum mentioned in the certificate of the Speaker. Mr. Austin will be heard on the same side to-morrow. VIVIAN V. BLOMBERG. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE in this case pronounced the decision of the Court, and having stated the grounds upon which their certificate to the Vice-Chancellor was founded, declared their ,opinion to be that the lease was not void. PREROGATIVE COURT, Nor. 24. FOX V. MARSTON. This is a suit respecting the validity of the will of the late Mr. John Fox, late of Uxeter, in the county of Staf ford, who died on the 12th of May, 1835, of apoplexy. It appeared that he drew up a will ill the January of that year, by which he left real property to the amount of 2001. per annum, to Ann Bakewell, an intimate friend, and the residue of the property, which, after the deduction of all the debts, amounted to about 80,0001., to Mr. Marston, a nephew of the deceased, and one of the parties in this suit. That in the February he intermarried with the said Ann Bakewell, and died in May following, and in the month of October a posthumous child was born. An allegation was this day offered on behalf of Mr. Marston. The KING'S ADVOCATE supported the admissibility of the allegation, and contended that the will was revoked by the marriage and the birth of the posthumous issue. Dr. Nicttou, followed on the same side. Dr. LUSHINGTON (with whom was Dr. Addams) ap peared on behalf of Mrs. Fox, late Ann Bakewell, the widow of the deceased, and opposed the allegation. The Learned JUDGE stated, that as the case required the deepest consideration, be would defer his judgment. COURT OF REQUESTS, KEvasaATE-STREET. HARMONY, LATIN, IND PHYSIC.—A very curiously developed outline of a medical student, named Rudland, was summoned by a little copper-coloured lady, named Ro binson, for the amount of 1/. 19s. 11d., for musical in struction supplied to the lady of Mr. Rudland. The original debt was 21, 25., but it had been reduced in order to render the recovery available in the Court of Requests. Mr. Commissioner DUBOIS desired the plaintiff to state her case. Plaintiff—Why, Sir, it is neither more nor less than this :—I keep an establishment for young ladies, and Mrs. Itudland desiring instruction in music, applied to me for that purpose. I told her that I did not teach myself, but that I had a young lady upon my establishment who did, and that the terms would be one guinea per quarter. Th o defendant acceded to these terms, and two quarters' in struction were taken, all but five days. COMMISSIONEIt—What have you to say to this, Sir? Defendant—Why, Sir, I have a set-off against her. I gave her the same amount of instruction in Latin.—(Laughter.) COMMISAIONER—Did you? and how did she advance in her studies ? Here a very fiery-looking personage, the music teacher, stepped forward, and assured the Commissioner that she had taught him (defendant) singing, and that was quite enough for the apothecary's rubbisrling, L stin.—( Laughter.) Defendant (very indignantly)—Why, I never could learn any thing from you ; you never taught me any thing, Madam ! Witness—N o won d er; you ' ve plenty of crotch e t s i n your head ; but you'll never learn music for all that ; and as to the Latin, why you know you can hardly decline a verb yourself.--( Laughter.) Defendant—But I could decline your instruction in sing ing, and therein lies the animus of the present action. CommissioNmi—You see, Mr. Rudlit!7d, the instruction afforded to your wife has nothing to do with the interchange of talent between Mrs. Robinson's witness and yourself. It appears that neither of you made much progress, and it was a very inharmonious affair altogether. It is the opi nion of myself and the Jury that the amount sued for must be paid, and that too directly. Here the order was made out, and the medical musical student quitted the Court considerably chagrined. FOUR-AND-TWENTY BEDYBLLOWS ALL OF A Row!— " As thick as three in a bed," has long bcen illustrative of too many in the sleeping department ; but the following throws the old adage altogether into the shade :—A gaunt Irish girl, named Ellen Lacy, summoned her mistress, Katty Sullivan, for 115.4 d. wages, alleged to be due. What are you, inquired Mr. Commissioner DUBOIS of the brawny-shouldered Mrs. Sullivan ? Mrs. Sullivan—lt's what am I! Sure, then, and I'm an honest woman ! COMMISSIONBR—How do you get your living ? Defendant—Sure I don't, your Honour's Wurtchip, know mighty well. I keep an open house. Divil's the one in St. Giles but knows honest ould Mother Sullivan ! COMMISSIONER —Really , Madam, I hadn't the pleasure of knowing all this. Do you mean to say you keep a lodging-house ? Defendant—Mighty well it is you've hit the same thing, —(Laughter.) Ido kape a lodging -house. COMMISSIONER—And pray how many beds do you make up ? Defendant—Och, your Honour, every room's a mighty fine bed. COMMISSIONER—And how many rooms does your esta blishment contain, Mrs. Sullivan ? Defendant—Why, in regard of that, and reckoning the cook-lofts and the two kitchens, and the ground behind, we've room for a matther of sivinty thravellers. COMMISSIONER—Now, let us come to the point. Why did you discharge your servant without paying her her wages ? Defendant—Och, she was too laborious for me— (Laughter.) She mightily blackguarded ivirey one of my best customers ; and bad luck to her, she kilt one of the finest boys that iver throd the bogs of Allen. COMMISSIONER—What, killed a boy I Pray how was that ? Defendant—Did'nt he die of a favour COMMISSIONER—Of a favour ?—(fever.) Defendant — Yes, me Lord, in the work-house ; and all bekase she did'nt lave him alone in me own place, and its me own mind that's made up. Och, may ths banshee soon wail a wake under her own casemint. Nivir's the long day that I'll pay her at all at all. COMMISSIONER—Swear Ellen Lacy on the cross, officer. Here Ellen Lacy was sworn, and it appearing that the sum of I Is. 4d. was due, it was ordered to be forthwith paid over to the beautiful Ellen. Mrs. Sullivan immedi ately opened the flood gates of her abuse upon the Commis sioner, and it was with considerable difficulty she was handed out of court. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. BOW-STREET. Yesterday several prOprietors of market-carts, used to bring vegetables, &c., to Covent-garden, were summoned by Rogers, the informer, under the Street pct, for suffer ing their vehicles to remain in the streets adjacent to the market, namely, James -street, King-street, Tavistock street, and Russell-street, longer than was necessary for loading or re-loading. The defendants were fined in various penalties. MARLBORO UGH-STREET. A young German girl, unable to speak a word of Eng lisp, has been to this office several times, and, with the aid of broken French, contrived to make her case known. She was at an inn in Aix-la-Chapelle, in the capacity of a servant, a short time ago, when she was invited by a lady named Mitford to accompany her to England, as one of her domestics. She did so, and went to live with Madame Mitford, at No. 22, Dover-street, Piccadilly. Her mis tress, having found some cause of complaint of a very trivial nature, according to the girl's statement, turned her out of the house without giving her a farthing of money. Being unable to make herself understood, her cruel situa tion fortunately became known to Mr. Davis, silk-mercer, in the same street, who persuaded Mr. Nicholls, landlord of the Three Klegs, Piccadilly, to give her shelter for the night. As Madame Mitford refused to pay the wages due, or to send her back to Aix-la-Chapelle, the girl came to this Office, to ask the Magistrate what course she should pursue. The application having become known to Madame Mit ford, that lady on Friday evening last came to the office, 44 d told Mr. Gregory the Magistrate, that the reason why she (lid not pay the girl, or send her back, was because some of her luggage was missing, and she suspected this had occurred through the girl's negligence. She had writ ten to the Continent on the subject, and as she expected to receive an answer by Wednesday, she would on that day settle with the girl. Madame Mitford then agreed to pay 15s. for the support of the girl until the specified time, and the matter rested. Yesterday Mr. Nicholls came again to the office to say that nothing as yet had been done for the poor girl. He was advised to go to Dover-street, and make another application to Madame Mitford. Mr. Nicholls shortly afterwards came back, and reported to Mr. Chambers that he had been favoured with an interview with the lady, who had put herself in a towering passion, and talked very loftily of having Royal blood in her veins, and her determination of not being imposed upon by English people. Madame Mitford then exclaimed : " Thanks be to God, I am a German woman, and not an English woman." Mr. Nicholls pressed her to come to some arrangement with the girl, or again call at Marlborough-street Office, and explain her objection to the magistrate. Madame Mit ford said she would not attend unless the magistrate wrote a note to her, and added, " I hold an office under the Queen, and if an attempt is made to impose on me, I will complain to her Majesty, and she will look into it ; but ah, poor thing, 'her Majesty has trouble enough with yan. English people !" Finding nothing could be done with Madame Mitford he brought the girl again to the office. She handed in a written agreement in French which she had entered into when she engaged with Madame Mit ford. The agreement specified that Madame the Widow Mitford agreed to take the girl Anne Marie Grit into her service, at one pound a month wages. In case she did not suit she was to have three pounds in addition to her wages, to defray her expenses back to Aix-la-Chapelle. ,Mr. CHAMBERS observed that it was a case in which a Magistrate had no power to interfere. The contract was a civil agreement, and only available through an attorney ; but as the girl had no money to commence proceedings with, he would try the effect of a note to Madame Mitford. The note was written, and pl ace d i n th e h an ds of Scho field, who went with the girl to Dover-street. The an swer Schofield brought back was that Madame Mitford would do nothing until she got an answer to her letter. MARYLEBONE. Yesterday Thomas Grn, a little grey-headed man, was charged before Mr. SHUTT, with having assaulted his wife Ann, a tall masculine woman, carrying on business as a laundress, at No. 37, Earl-street East, Lisson-grove. The complainant, with great volubility, proceeded to give the history of her matrimonial disputes with the defendant for the last thirty years, and concluded by stating that on Tuesday last, during one of those fierce struggles for su premacy, her would-be lord and master being worked up to the highest pitch of exasperation, ran to the fire and threw a kettle of red hot water over her, which scalded her very much, and not contented with this, he threatened to burn her liver out with a poker, then in the fire. Mr. SHUTT (to defendant) —What have you to say ? Defendant (fetching a deep sigh)—lt's me that ought to be the complainant. Will your Worship believe it, that wicked woman (pointing to his wife) actually keeps a man under my nose, who is fed sumptuously in the best room in the house, while my scanty fare, consisting generally of a red herring and potatoe, is supplied me in the kitchen. Complainant.—Don't you talk you ugly little wretch ; have not you formed an improper acquaintance with ano ther laundress besides your lawful wife, a vidder of Port land Town ; and didn't I come there one day upon the sly and catch you turning her mangle, now ? But. I'll mangle you, rot you will I. Defendant.—lt's no disgrace to turn a mangle for a lady wot a'nt capable and strong enough to do it herself. Complainant.—l dare say it arn't no harm, Mr. Impu dence ; I'll teach you better, though. Mr. SHUTT (to defendant) —If this man annoys you, why don't you turn him out ? Defendant. —I would if I was strong enough, but you see I am but a little old man, while he is a tall strapping fellow. Mr. SHUTT dismissed the case, whereupon the wife left the office in a great rage, threatening to punish her unruly husband herself. William, Wilberforce, a man of colour, residing in Phoe nix-yard, Old Cavendish-street, was charged with cracking the jaw, and threatening to close the eyes of his wife,Judy, a thumping loquacious damsel, from the Sister Kingdom. The wife detailed the particulars of the assault, and ex hibited her face, which was bandaged up. In conclusion, she vowed never to live with her sable partner again, and prayed the Magistrates to grant a divorce. Mr. HOSKINS—What hare you to say to breaking your wife's jaw ?—Husband—Me no break jaw, Massa Vership. She talk plenty fast, you see ; if jaw be broke, it stop, Massa. She too fond of de vite man, Massa, and ven I braided her of it, she told me to turn out, and jump Jim Crow. Wife—You nasty story-teller ; its you that are too fond of the black ladies ; but I've done with you now. After much crimination and recrimination the Magis trates ordered poor Jim Crow to find bail, in default of which he was locked up. UNION-11A L L. James Ford, a confectioner, in the Kent - ro ad, and Wet. Kettsit, an anchorsmith, at Deptford, were summoned be• fore the magistrates at the instance of the overseers of their respective parishes, for refusing to maintain their parents. In the case of Ford, it appeared that his mother, an aged woman, residing in the parish of Barton Stacey, in the county of Southampton, was compelled to make appli cation to the parochial authorities for relief. The guar- dians immediately gave her admission into the workhouse; and having subsequently ascertained that she had a son who was carrying on a good business in the neig-bbJurhold of London they caused enquiries to Ix% made on the subject, and the result was, that an application was made to Ford on behalf of his mother ; but he refused to contribute any thing to her maintenance, on the ground that he had a wife and children to support. Under these circumstances it was determined to summon him, to shew cause why h e did not comply with the application made on behalf of his mother by the parish officers. Richard King, the over seer of Barton Stacey, having that the old woman was chargeable to that parish, the defendant, on being asked the grounds of his refusal to assist in the maintenance of his mother, said that he was not prosperous in business, and that he could not afford to do anything for her. The MAGISTRATES, having heard the whole circum stances, as well as the want of any adequate defence on the part of Ford as to his incompetence to maintain his mother, adjudged him to pay over to the parochial authori ties a weekly sum to reimburse them for her support in the workhouse. The case of the other defendant was then entered into, by which it appeared that his father was an inmate of the workhouse at Deptford, and that he also refused to contri bute anything towards his maintenance. The defendant wagesstro n gly for urged theabove purpose,b to ut spare it ha anythingviog been from gie ll ie ji evidence that he was in the receipt of from 2 /. to 3 1 . p week, an order was made upon him to pay from hence forth 2s. per week towards defraying the expenses of his 'ather's support. TRADE. MANCHESTER.—WC are happy to state, that since last, week, there has been a visible improvement in several of the branches of our commerce, and that none of them ar e worse. Beginning with the raw material, cotton, we may say that no alteration of moment has taken place, either as i it respects demand or price. Yarns, both of low and of g ood quality, are purchased rather freely, the exports keeP ln g this branch quite clear of any thing like accumulation! whilst, at the same time, they arc in a fair average req uess for our own fancy and coloured goods for the home trade' With respect to goods, the accounts are (taking the sea' into son, the state of commercial feeling, and other things consideration), decidedly better than last week. Fustian?, we believe, remain dull of sale, though it is not probable that will long be the case, the turn-out of the cutters being nearly compromised by the somewhat tardy acquiescence of the foreign houses, with few exceptions, in the adva ll :t. they demanded. Of calicoes, there is nothing claiming c 7; rect remark. Printing cloths, 7-Bths, are in good dem and' the manufacturers are not generally desirous to sell at Pre sent prices, they being considered scarcely remunerative. There is little difficulty in selling good ginghams for bor ne wear, nor handkerchiefs of the same material ; the weavers of this branch are better employed than those Of tel e l other at the present time. Prints are about as were wont to be at this season ; little doing in that line ; though prices are well maintained. Some very superior de' signs are, we understand, in preparation for the sPr icg trade. Indeed, this art has attained a wonderful and Ple a !: ing degree of perfection, and some very fine engraving s 1 ; one colour, and designs and executions in block-work , t his already to be seen in the sale-rooms of some houses in town. In the silk trade there is no amendment. The money-market appears to have assumed a somewhat fi rine . tone. A more collected feeling is gradually succee ding This is the case, we believe, nationally as well as locallyi _Manchester Chronicle. Trade on the whole, conti nue in as healthy a state in this town as could reasonably be e s c i, pected. This season of the year is always a dull one ;an that usual dulness is now aggravated in some quarters ' the crippled state of the American demand, and in other° by the difficulties of the money-market. Nevertheless( there are few heavy stocks, and there is a great d esb ne satisfactory business doing, both in goods and yarns ;. of the foreign markets, we believe, being overload s Manchester Guardian. DUNDEE.—The agitation which has for some time V I ; veiled in the south, has at length extended to this clu e ' e e d During the last few weeks several failures have occ urr here, and these have produced an injurious effect both nl)° , 3 f trade and upon credit. We cannot hazard an estimate the amount of failures ; but, in so far as we can learn, non of the parties who have stopped payment were in first-rai; credit, and no one possessed of actual property lins" rr ee ue put to inconvenience for want of accommodation. effects of the present agitation will doubtless be se vereil felt for some time by the trading and manufacturing classes; but, with the exception of the markets in North America, all the other outlets for our commodities continue unob; strutted, and the demand f or th em i n so me quarters, by til latest accounts, steadily extending. With such prospect?' we see nothing in the present position of affairs to occasl ° l serious alarm. The u nexam pl e d i ncrease o f our t ra de, n o— facilities afforded f o r th e op era ti ons o f p ar ti es withoncti the requisite capital or knowledge of business, have prepar 3 the way for the reaction which is now experienced ; an d :a , is fair to calcul a t e th a t, w h en b us i ness s h a ll h ave restnn e its wonted and natural c h anne l its action will be ins healthy an d v i gorous th an i t was b e f ore . By the failu k, which h ave occurre d, an d w hi c h are , compara tively ?P ea a , r 0 ing, of trifling amount, the resourses of our merchants an manufacturers cannot be materially impaired. Their e ne t and enterprise will enable them to surmount their Pre ° difficulties.—Dundee Advertiser. ors GLasGow.—A meeting of the master power-loom we n c e has just taken place, and they have resolved, in c Onsegn eP ' re . of a demand made for a rise of wages, to stop tlr.. ir ee t• 1" spective works, throwing 14,000 looms off work. A oe ing of the steam-boat owners is to be called for the PE P. '" „- p i r of agreeing to lay up their vessels for the winter, in s e . jo g as their places can be occupied by sailing-vessels recl uir w e no feul, and not again start them till the price of coals ° ,o to the maximum price fixed by the operatives, of 1 ° r waggon.—Glasgow Chronicle. I 1 - - While anxiously waiting yesterday for news' : ec l capture of Bilboa by the Carlists being currently reP ° 'r; the ennui at the Exchange and Lloyd's was somewhato-ot lieved by the rumoured arrival of a " pigeon e%Pr es 4 $ Lloyd's ! At 1 o'clock a pigeon did actually arrive, w-tbe string tied round .its body, and a despatch attached t ° string. It flew in at one of the skylights, or was s tarte- 0/' the rooms, and it skimmed round the place, to the an o' ante at first of the impatient parties then and ther e 3 ; e cl , bled, as the said courier would not allow itself to be sec-iici After a time it perched in a window, where it had the Otwel quietly to remain ; and as the kite-tail was so boyis i h l Y 0 $ clumsily attached to the pigeon, the paper hanging u tpvi op' yard from the pigeon's body, the waggery soon becam e :i it p are nt to all, and'ns the bird co uld no t b e got eo'l'ir continued in the roof-wind ow , th e "express" remainin% opened. ' s tet' The William, Hodnett master, of 700 tons r e g l ,„ or and bound f rom L on d on to S t . Vi ncen t w ith a cart- 00 bricks an d til es , ran as h ore t o t h e wes t o f Billing o'P' t bst Thursday night. We are happy to state, however',ciii, the crew and passengers were all saved. —Brighton Gum The NEW FLAT GOLD WA - rtic al are offered in double-bottomed engine-turned cases, with `C ho . - 1 1 ori' movements, for Seven Guineas each, or, with highly.finiszontal movements, jewelled and warranted, at Nine Guineltll, cob, at T. COX SAVORY'S, Working Goldsmith, Sil versio" pi Watchmaker, 47, Cornhill, London. led N.B.—The horizontal construction is strongly rccoaulle9( its superior accuracy. - BIRTHS. On the 21st inst., at Forest Rill, near Windsor, the 134 F. Riley, Esq., of a daughter, still-born. On the 21st inst., in Audley-square, Mrs. of a 9°ll ' Joll r ' On the 23d inst., in Claremont square, Pentonville, Yates, of a son. of a On the 18ch inst., in Tavistock-square, Mrs. R. Smith, o f Ca r On the 21st inst., at Buckland, Farringdon, the Countess narvon, of a son. Chatu berl' On the 23d inst., in Fitzroy-square, the lady of J• J. Esq., of a (laughter Christopher Rawlins,lie ne''' 13. A. f , A V R ic R ar I o E f Thornton, York , On the 23d inst., at St. James's Chuach, Westminster, t , eo cto to y E' eldest daughter of the lato G. Rickards, Esq., ol Piccdilllore, On the 22d init. at Portsmouth, Mortimer R. R. \ Blll, a ntai n Esq., Royal Fusileers, to Cecilia, daughter of the lion- C ' Byng, R.N. a .1. •14 n' t' On the 17th inst., at Christ Church, Hull, the Rev. -; 310 kinson, Rector of Kettlethorp e, Lincolnshire, to An daughter of the late Rev. C. B . Massin g berd. e g ir t On the 17th inst., at St. George's Church, Hanover-squgrht,er 0 bert Tod, Esq., of Edinburgh, to Mary Ann, eldest clan Mr. R. Leach, of Holborn• the nerr On the 24th inst., at St. George's, Hanover-square, . o f the mony having been pr eviously•performed according to the ritleZrardea, Roman Catholic Church, John Errington, Esq., of Nigh . v i re, Northumberland, to Anne, youngest daughter of Vincent i Esq., of Belgrave-square. f , g On the 22d inst., aged 37, DIED. . minci° ,. On the 22d inst., at Clapham-rise, S. Hellatt, Egg- ,°' lane, aged 79. of Upton, Essex. On the 23d inst., at Cheshunt, Hertfordshire, Esq., aged 76. in field , Coffee-house, Grafton-street E M a a s r t y . ' wife On the 21st inst., at Bishopsteignton, Devon, aged 31, nwic h, Holmes, daughter ;1 ' J a . r daughter of the late W. Cu ' teiS, Esti', of Groom's -hill, G,!•;.Leieriti of W. J. Leschor, Esq. On the 18th inst., aged 3r6, Mrs. Mary Smith of John t he u j ii eflers°' Jane Mi ce k• On the 2lst inst On the 21st inst., Castle Carey, Somerset, aged bt' atl Har riet *Wm. Paul. iliroainnaear,gEhsqC.a,stle, Blackheath, _door High Bailiff of Sothe Bei` Stapleton, wife of the Rev. J. Stapleton, and sist . • cla°o - the 22d inst., at Pussy House, Farringdon , Carnarvon.Elizabeth,eldest ~_ Hants, that -0 0 On the 19th inst., at 13ramdean, .. p _ ter of the late Rev. N. • Gomm, Y Y _________---i -•io• -t--_-_-!------------2..------ ,--7 - .., -- -JouNG , ° 0 1 London: Printed and Published by MIT:D..-, rid,n tile co tra. , -at The Sun Office, No. DI '-' 112, Strand, 23, 1836. of Middlesex, —Friday, November V man • ears Rector ot tciroliatlti-eY V. 14 Of