The Sun. — London, England, 1836-09-30 00:00:00

PIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS " If (says the Times, alluding to our observations on the subject of Peerage Reform) the unequivocal manifestation' of the popular feeling be all that is ne cessary to determine the doubts of these seekers after the truth, how is it that the disgust everywhere evinced for their master, O'Connell, through his mission, pro duced no effect on them ? How happens it that Sir William Molesworth's loss of a county for nothing but his advocacy of Peerage Reform has escaped their notice ? What, in short, can have blinded them to the numbers, respectability, and wealth of those who, we may say, from week to week have congregated at Conservative meetings, &c. ?" We have a short answer to this. Sir Wm. Molesworth declined stand ing again for Cornwall, not because the popular feeling was ag ainst him, but because Peerag e R e f orm h a d alie nated from him certain influential Whig landowners, and a contest would, in consequence, have demanded from him a heavier outlay than he chose to bear. Who ever said that Peerage Reform was popular with the aristocracy? Since we expressed a wish for the unequi vocal manifestation of public feeling on the subject, that wish has been gratified to an extent we durst hardly have anticipated at Taunton, Waterford, &c. ; and we have no doubt that every other un packed public meeting will manifest the same unequi vocal decision in favour of Peerage Reform. At Waterford Mr. Nicholas Purcell O'Gorman, a man of unquestionable integrity, could not prevail on the meet ing to listen even to a speech in which he expressed doubts whether the Lords ought to be reformed. These are cheering symptoms. We are not aware that any speaker, however generally respected, has succeeded, at any meeting of Reformers, in obtaining a favourable reception when opposing all chang e in the Peers. In fact, even a t th e di nner i n L ee d s to Lord Morpeth, which was attended by a select party of friends, the speakers who opposed Peerage Reform were very coldly received, according to the Leeds Mercury, the pro prietor of which was one of them. The Times, allud ing to the letter of Mr. Baines, observes, "He says to his brother Radicals, Let us send to the House of Commons a majority of 150 in favour of the present Ministers, and then should the King call the Conservatives to his Councils we can stop the supplies.' This is almost as good a contrivance as the school-boy manoeuvre for catching birds by putting salt on their tails. If he will but catch his majority of 150 in the Commons, we may make him a present of the power of stopping the sup plies." Mr. Baines certainly does not make suf ficient allowance for the unprotected state of the voters in the counties and smaller boroughs, when he sup poses that, in spite of intimidation, voters will conti nually expose themselves to heavy sacrifices to keep the Lords in order. We trust there will at the next general election be a much greater majority than we have at present ; and from the purifications of the Cor porations this result may be expected. But Mr. Baines, if he reflect a moment, must be aware that it will very much damp the zeal of electors to know that their sacrifices, however great (and, from the distribu tion of property in this country, conscientious voting is often attended with serious loss to the elector), leave the evil principle in full vigour. The people will, we trust, become convinced some day or other that they may as well insist on the purification of the Lords. Such demonstrations as have lately been made at public meetings will soon effect many converts in the higher ranks. In the mean time great good is done by familiarising the people with the doctrine that the House of Lords must be reformed. Let but the people be convinced, and the effect will follow in due time.--Morning Chronicle. The public attention is anxiously turned, and no wonder, to the occurrences which are hour)r taking place in Spain and Portugal ; for on the result of the pending crisis in those countries is llely to hang so much of the question of peace or war throughout the greater part of Europe, as is not of a nature to be directly determined by the collision of Turkish, Bri t:sli, and Russian interests in the East. The contro versy which has been raised within this last fortnight, between the Conservative press and that which acts under the wise and virtuous dictation of Lord Pal merston, is on our side very simple. From the out set our proposition has been, that France and England, since the revolution which was forced upon Queen Christina at la Granja, were released from all such obligation of interference between Don Carlos and his niece as had rested on the provisions of the Quadruple Treaty. We took occasion to show, that if England had bound herself to the execution of a treaty, for certain purposes, with regard to the Peninsula, she ought to have chosen for partners in that compact one or more States on whose bona fide fulfilment of their pledges, and promotion of the common objects of the treaty, her Government could have reasonably relied. We showed that so far from such precautions having been taken on the part of England, her Foreign Mi nister had from the very first hour been the dupe, and tool, and laughing-stock of his incomparable ally, King Louis. Philippe, which latter Potentate had, shrewdly and profitably for his personal ends, left the whole weight of active interposition upon his shallow-brained confederate in Downing -street, being himself too saga cious to encourage the spread of democracy in his own domains by facilitating its triumph upon its frontier. This statement of ours was never answered, but only sneered at by Lord Palmerston and his newspapers as a slander upon the King of the French. We had no in tention to malign or affront that politic and skilful Sovereign. He did what lie judged most beneficial to his own Crown, and most conducive to the peace of his kingdom, It was not on every hedge that Louis Philippe would find such a convenient cloak as Viscount Palmerston, nor would any French man charge the King with dishonesty for converting such a God-send to his own uses. Louis Philippe's game was to keep possession of the Tuileries—our hero's was to keep the Foreign-office. The King of the French made a show of sympathy with that which called itself the Liberal cause in Spain, that he might blindfold the revolutionary spirits of Paris, Lyons, and the eastern departments of the kingdom, until he should gain ti me to put h an d cu ff s on t h em . W e say nothing of th e mora li ty o f such a procee di ng, w hi c h is no concern of o urs . W e b ut state t h e f ac t, and state it correctly, when we asseverate that Louis Philippe did not execute the Quadruple Treaty ac cording to its spirit—that he did not throw those im pediments in the way of Don Carlos which he might have done, nor furnish such protections and sup plies as were easily withi n hi s power to Queen Christina, seeing that he had Lord Palmerston to deal with, and therefore reckoned on impunity. We asserted then, and we abide by it, that Lord Pal merston courted a Power which had duped him, and that his schemes for wh a t h e termed the " settlement " of the Peninsula—that is, for the en throning of Ferdinand's daughter, and the expul sion of his brother from Spain—had been frustrated by the very means which he employed to effect both objects. After the revolution of La Granja, our proposition was distinctly, that to all practical intents and purposes the quadruple alliance was at an end ; that Louis Philippe would do nothing as between Don Carlos and the rabble dictatorship at Madrid, and that England ought to do nothing. For each of these opinions we were grossly abused, and pelted with spiteful epithets. The vilification, indeed, was divided between Louis Philippe and ourselves -Ist, the King being charged with the most odious perfidy for not marching an army across the Pyrenees In support of a Government with and on behalf f which he had signed a treaty of qualified assistance, but which had already " ceased to reign," being over turned by a band of its own licentious soldiery—and 2d, the Times being scurrilized for " not knowing" that treaties are made with nations, not with Govern ments pro tempore. We stuck to our text, that Louis Philippe would act as if th e qua d rup l e all i ance was superseded by the introducti on of a completely new principle—viz./ that of armed democracy—into the Queen's cause, and Lord Palmerston knows, to his cost, how fully the French King has realized our pre diction. We likewise clung to the text of the treaty, maintaining it to have been signed with one of two belligerent parties, instead of with the whole people of the Peninsula. The belligerent party was one which aspired (the British Government said rightfully) to the Spanish crown. But that crown was the sym bol of a Constitutional monarchy : it was not the fool's cap of an armed mob. Our second thesis was, therefore, that under the quadruple treaty, all duty of interference as between Carlos and Christina had ceased on the part of England ; that the duty of neutrality, which had been set aside by the treaty, now returned in all its original force ; that the principle of non intervention forming the rule, and that of a sti pulated interference the exception, the right of interference was altogether annulled by the re moval of those conditions under which the inter ference had been stipulated ; that, in fact, Eng land now again was free ; that she ought to leave Carlos unmolested by the marines and men-of-war which hung upon the coasts in his possession ; and the Christinos, on their side, unburdened by the mock support of a corps of hapless Englishmen, who seem to have experienced little of warfare but its wants and mortifications. Will Lord Palmerston venture to make England any longer an inglorious and sneaking medler in this alien quarrel ? Will he venture to delay for another hour the recall of our ships and marines from the Spanish coast, or the provision of means of transport home for the ruined volunteers of Colonel Evans, betrayed and sacrificed through the poltroonery of the Whig Cabinet, not daring to do in the name of their , Sovereign and country that into which they seduced, under incitements which have all proved false, an unthinking band of their fellow-citi , zens ? We were taxed no longer ago than yesterday morning with having changed our tone, and now re proached the Whig Government with not interfering to prevent or crush the double revolutions of Lisbon and La Granja. The charge is a pure falsehood. We never said one word to the effect of urging such an interposi tion. With the revolution of La Granja we had no business to meddle, although its occurrence shows how little prepared our Ministry have been for the catas trophe which has befallen the whole system of their co-operation, or whatever they please to call it, with regard to Spain. And this is, if possible, still more apparent with regard to Portugal. We have accused Lord Palmerston of a stubborn and conceited disre gard of the timely warnings which lie received of what was about to happen ; that is, we accused him of total incapacity. His newspaper defenders avow that lie was prepared for it. Our charge was of " folly" their defence is " crime." If he knew it the Queen of Portugal ought to have known it. Had she known it, she would have besought the British Admiral to protect her, and appealed to her own subjects in behalf of her constitutional throne. Neither the Admiral's protection, nor the loyalty of the nation, would in that case have been deaf to the Sovereign's prayer. It is now perhaps too late ; but that it is so, who will not justly blame the imbecility of what ought to have been the protecting power ?—Times. It is now about four years since that important branch of criminal law reform which concerns the law of forgery was carried through the Legislature. Offi cial documents have confirmed, nay, more than con - firmed, the anticipations of the advocates of the aboli tion of the penalty of death as to time substitution of a less revolting punishment being more efficacious for the repression of a crime against which the sword of exterminating law had been drawn in vain. Among those advocates were upwards of 1,000 bankers. whose memorable petition in favour of the removal of the capital enactment we published and commented upon at the time. The bigotted adherents of the old system of strangulation on the scaffold attempted to work upon the fears of a commercial community, by predicting that to take away the gallows from the protection of paper credit would be to pronounce extinction ! The same sort of appeal to sordid pre judices had been adopted to prevent the passing of Romillv's Bill to repeal the atrocious enactment which made the privately stealing to the value of jive shillings in a shop punishable with death I Under this law the young woman Mary Jones suffered, whose case Sir William Meredith relates with so much sim ple pathos. Deprived of her husband by the barba rous practice of impressment, in a state of destitution, with a child at her breast, she snatched from a counter in a state of desperation, property amounting in value to that number of shillings which the law of a Chri s hun people had made the price of human life. She was in fact driven to crime by the Government that executed her ; but then she died, said the merciless supporters of the five shillings law, to preserve from destruction the shopkeeping interests ofEngland, which never could survive the repeal or disuse of a law so necessary to protect the contents of their counters from ruinous depredation. Alas for the prophecies of those oracles of Draconic le g islation how are they falsi fied by the results I The Forgery Bill of 1832 abolished the punishment of death for all but two species of that offence, and commercial credit sur vives the shock I The law that inflicted death for stealing to the amount of five shillings in a shop has long ceased to exist, and shopkeeping interests still continue to flourish I—nor are the con tents of the counter—the silk ribands, laces, chintzes, tape, and bobbins, one whit the more liable to depre dation, because five shillings worth of those articles can no longer be weighed in the scales of Shylock jus tice against human blood. But a sentence of death against a forger has been pronounced within a few days, by the Recorder of London, at the Court of the Old Bailey. The case of this person—we mean, of course, the attorney Peacock—is one of the exceptions in the forgery law—an exception too of Whig origin, having been proposed by the Marquis of Lansdowne in the House of Lords, subsequently to the Bill for the total abolition of the penalty of death having twice passed the Commons. The Whig accusers of the House of Lords have not, however, made this one of their inculpatory items in their Bill of impeachment against the Peers, for innovating upon the decisions of the Commons. This last effort to retain some por tion of the old and barbarous system, and to hand it down as a precious relic to posterity, who might other wise have doubted that, in Christian and moral Eng land, such a law could ever have existed, being the act of a Whig Lord and a Whig Minister, is not re corded among the imputed delinquencies of the House of Peers, by the Peer-denouncing partisans of the Ministry. Nevertheless, if the prisoner Peacock should be sent to the scaffold, the law under which the criminal suffers, as well as his execution, will be the act of the Whigs—the pretended disciples and treacherous asso ciates of the lamented Romilly, in the work of criminal law reform. To punish with the death of the murderer the person who commits an offence of fraud and circumven tion, is to confound those internal distinctions of mo rality which the all-wise Creator implanted in the mind of man, and is, consequently, less an exercise of the legitimate power than the impious audacity of human legislation. Leaving the crime to all the moral disgrace and infamy which belongs to it, we cannot confound it with murder, either in its nature or punishment. But, independently of religious considerations, there was one great practical argument urged upon the most abundant proofs, by the advocates of the total abolition of the penalty of death for that offence: it was that the punish ment of death rather encouraged crime than protected property, because of the great number of persons whom it deterred, through motives of conscience and humanity, from putting the law in motion as prosecu tors, or administering it according to evidence as jurors. On such grounds did the thousand bankers to whom we have alluded claim protection for their property, by the abolition of the capital law. The penalty of death was removed in all cases, except forgeries of powers of attorney . and wills, because it was the least effective of all punishments. Why then should that inefficient punishment be retained for such cases ? Ought pro perty under powers of attorney, and wills, to be less protected than other property? Let the Marquis of Lansdowne answer that question, if lie can. If he cannot answer it satisfactorily—and we are sure he can not—the punishment of death for those cases of for gery should be abolished, as equally impracticable and barbarous. An execution for forgery now-a-days would raise a burst of indignation against the Whigs, which they had better not provoke.—Morning Herald. Were we not right in describing the " moderation" of Whig-Radicals as of that kind which exhibits itself not only in the most foul abuse of their oppo nents, but in the most fulsome adulation of them selves and their agents wherever they may happen to be carrying o❑ the work of calumny and sedition ? Look at the way in which these manly personages speak of Mr. Villiers Stuart, who made a❑ exposure of himself the other day at a public dinner in Water- j ford. We do believe that the most slavish cour tier, in the worst era of bad taste, when gross flattery was mistaken for politeness, never uttered such a strain of nasty adulation, as we find poured forth by the Whig-Radical puffers of this Mr. Stuart. His great fishes, his wonderful family descent, and above all his " scathing eloquence," are dwelt upon with a sort of worship which—if not very decent—is at least instruc- 1 tive. It shows how sincere are the professions of Whig-Radicals, who, when it is their cue to beguile the multitude, affect to care for none of these things, but to be mightily enamoured of the plain fustian jacket and pot-o'-beer school of political philosophy, wherein fortune, nor family, nor even " scathing elo quence "go for much. But is Mr. Villiers Stuart in deed this prodigious personage that he is described to be ? Of his family and fortune we cannot say that we have before heard ; and his modest panegyrics not having supplied any details upon the subject, we sup pose we must be content to remain in our ignorance, except we admit as a true light the glare which his fond, familiar friends have been pleased to cast upon both. His name looks tolerably well upon paper ; but if, through it, he claims connection with the illustrious and unfortunate house whose peculiar principles cost them the Throne of these realms, we must say that his family honours are rather an odd theme of eulogy in the mouths of Whig-Radicals. Upon the Gen tleman's prodigious fortune we congratulate him, for if it be a real thing it is a very agreeable sort of ap pendage, even to family honours, and " scathing elo quence." But we hope it is not what vulgar in quirers into the validity of pecuniary representations call " an Irish fortune "—that is to say, an estate of which the annual value is to be ascertained by re moving the " significant digits " from before the por tentious ciphers in the enumeration of its acres. We say this, not that we have any information re specting the county of Waterford, which enters into the particulars of the ownership of land ; but the truth is, we have known but very, very few instances of Whig-Radicals who were not either very far from being rich, or very far from being wise. We should be sorry to throw a doubt upon the wisdom of Mr. Stuart, and therefore we have, in spite of ourselves, been driven to the other alternative. But as to the " scathing eloquence," we must not forget that, because a specimen of the article is furnished by those who have puffed it off, and we are thus provided with the means of judging for ourselves, we do think the puffers would have acted more judiciously if they had kept back the specimen. It is as much like " scath ing eloquence" as a stinking explosion of brimstone and nitre at the side scene of a theatre is like the scathing fire from heaven, which is called (for short ness) " lightning." Mr. Stuart may indeed be a very wise person—a very Socrates in wisdom ; but we must take upon ourselves to deny that he is a De mosthenes in eloquence. In earliest truth, we never read in all our speech-reading days more sorry stuff than that of which he was, according to the re porters, delivered on Thursday last. There are some exceedingly sage persons, whom Heaven has not made orators, nor indeed permitted them the ca pacity of emitting common sense when called upon to speak in public. For two reasons we opine that Mr. Stuart must be one of these ; first, that, as he is, and has been for some time, a Member of Parliament, and is such a prodigy of that is important in station, and brilliant in intellect, we should pro bably have heard something of the gentleman at West minster but for the infirmity to which we have alluded. The attributing to him " scathing eloquence" must be a joke, of which, for the life of us, we cannot perceive the good nature. Secondly, this very speech4at the Waterford dinner is a most miserable piece of sing song prose, garnished with scraps of verse, something like the pages of a young lady's ; and, indeed,' we must say, that were it not for the unpleasantness of setting down a man as much more a fool than his friends represent him to be, we should suspect that Mr. Stuart's understanding was furbished very much after the album fashion —pretty, to be sure, but rather puerile. Mr. Stuart, it would appear, had screwed himself up to talk about Lord Lyndhurst and the House of Lords, and wisely mindful that, if he touched upon any other topic first, he might by possibility get a little confused, and the fire of his " scathing eloquence" be obscured by the smoke of a hazy memory, he dashed at once upon his great theme, and delivered himself point blank of the following stupendous sentence :—" Ireland, I have no hesitation in saying, is an especial object of wrath and punish ment by the dominant party in the House of Peers." There spoke the deliberate wisdom of the wonderful man whom the electors of the county of Waterford have made a senator I Who can fail to perceive the political sagacity of this discovery ? Its truth is only to be equalled by its verisimilitude—that the House of Peers should select a particular portion of the empire for the object of its wrath and punishment is so pro bable, that we wonder it was left to the "scathing elo quence" of an after-dinner speech in the town of Waterford to point it out. But we must not curtail Mr. Stuart's sentence concerning, and against, the House of Peers of its fair proportions. He is not a man without his reasons—" for every why he has a wherefore." After telling us of the select wrath of the House of Peers, he adds—" and wherefore ? Because, upon a question of Irish policy it was that the favourite Administration of that (the Conserva tive) party was overthrown, and by the instrumentality of Irishmen the country was saved from the grasp of those who were upon the point of trampling its liberties under foot." Is not this a moderate and rea sonable describer of political affairs ? Is he not worthy the rhapsodical eulogies of the Whig-Radical press, as the hope and promise of these present times ? But when the echoes of these eulogies have died away, and left a little interval of quiet, perhaps Mr. Stuart will permit us to suggest that there is a .slight mis take—not as to the "grasp " of the Conservatives, or their intention to " trample the liberties of the country under foot." Mr. Stuart sees through all that, of course, better than we do ; but is it not a mistake to say that Sir R. Peel's Go vernment was outvoted in the House of Commons upon a question of Irish policy ? We think it is. It was upon an abstract question about the appro priation of Church property to secular purposes—a question very important in principle, but which would have had as much to do with the practical policy in governing Ireland as the wheat crop which will be in the year 1876 has to do with the present price in Mark-lane. Much more might be said about Mr. Stuart's speech ; but, to confess the truth, we are rather tired of him, and of it. The outrageous and most ignorant impertinence which is attributed to him respecting Lord Lyndhurst should be treated, in our opinion, with silent contempt.—Morning Post. The practice lately commenced of the liberal Mem bers of the House of Commons rendering to their con stituents an annual account of their stewardship is daily becoming more general. We rejoice that it is so. This is a most salutary practice ; it brings the repre sentatives of the people, and those who made them so, into familiar intercourse together, strengthens the bond of union between them, and leads to a most beneficial interchange of sentiment between the representative and the represented. Mr. Williams, the Member for Covenrry, has been rendering an account of this kind to his constituents ; and the result of the meeting con vened for the purpose was, as it ought to be in the case of so honest and liberal a representative,— the passing of an unanimous vote of confidence in him. The Hon. Gentleman, in the course of his speech, adverted in becoming terms to the neces sity which exists for Peerage Reform. He very pro- PerlY aske(iwhether 250 hereditary Legislators were to be suffered to defeat the wishes and frustrate the hopes of 24,000,000 of men ? There was not a bo som in the vast assemblage which the Hon. Member they shall not." a T d i d ia r t es a se i d t , ef t o h r a in t n of ot th in e w H ar o d u ly se s o a f y ' P --- eer ' s is certain, and not very remote, we have affirmed times without num ber. That is a settled point among the people of England. The only question is as to the nature and extent of that Reform. Mr. Williams, in his speech, made some observations on this point, which well de serve attention. He, by implication, suggests a plan which would effect the desired object by the least ob jectionable of means. The Hon. Gentleman's plan, inked, does not embrace any external interference with the ligpf..* House. It is one which would com pel their Lordship s . to reform themselves. Mr. Wil- 3 liams's plan is simply to extend the constituency, and to confer on the people the right of voting by ballot. He maintains that with an enlarged constituency, and that perfect freedom of voting which the ballot secures, the Reformers of England would, at the first general election, return such an overwhelming majority of libe ral men to Parliament as would, by their very numbers, frighten the Tory Peers from their work of obstruction for ever after. Lord Brougham, in an article understood to be written by him twelve months since in the Edin burgh Review, proposed, as a sure and unobjectionable way of inducieg the Peers to pass liberal measures, that the people should return such a preponderance of Refor mers to the House of Commons, as would carry allliberal measures in that House by such a majority as that the Lords would not dare to reject them. The error of his Lordship was that he recommended the people of England to do a certain thing, without pointing out to them the way in which that thing could be accom plished. He told them to return an overpowering majority of Liberal representatives, but he did not tell them how this was to be done. It is clear to every body that the people of England, in the event of an other general election, could not, in the existing state of the representation, make any material addition, however great their exertions, to the Liberal majority of the House of Commons. All that it was possible to do in this way, they did at the last general election. Give them however the ballot, coupled with an ex tended suffrage, and the next general election, come when it may, will give the Reform interest in the House of Commons a majority of 250, instead of the present small majority of 30 or 40. Would the Lords reject measures passed by a majority of 250 of the Commons ? Not they. They would then see resist ance to be worse than madness.—Morn. Advertiser. SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. VESSELS ENTERED INWARDS AT THE CUS TOM-HOUSE, SEPT. 29. The Batavier, Dunlop, from Rotterdam ; Earl of Liverpool. Lomax, Ostend; Hindostan, Redman, Calcutta; Alexander, Elder, Jamaica; Spring, Laraman, Jersey ; Resolution, Gard ner, Quebec ; Armata, Hudson, Santa Martha ; Maria, Wallis, Dantzic ; Clementson, Henby, jun., Jamaica; William, Reid, Rio; Valleyfield, Swinton, Ceylon; William Jolliffe, Mid dleton, Calais. ENTERED OUTWARDS FOR LOADING, SEPT. 29. The John Wood, Woodruff, for Havre ; Maria, Parbolet, Rotterdam ; Bennett, Hayne, Charleston ;t Apollo, Milne, Grenada ; John Bull, Corbin, Hamburgh ; Sir Edward Bankes, Norwood, Rotterdam ; Robert, Brandt, Stettin; Dart, Block, Ostend. CLEARED OUTWARDS WITH CARGO, SEPT. 29. The Flora, Lamburd, for Hamburgh ; King George, Gar. ner, Ostend; Attwood, Strannack, Rotterdam; Highlander ; Foster, Boston. CLEARED OUTWARDS IN BALLAST, Saar. 29. The Jane, Olsen, for Norway ; Shakspeare, Pearson, Got henburg ' • Henriette, Twickcn, Memel ; Emilia, Muscat, Calais ; Sarah, Love, Memel. ARRIVALS AT LIVERPOOL, SEPT. 28. The L'Amatie, Glandwin, from Charleston ; Adelaide, Per rian, Leghorn; Phoebe, Battary, Quebec; Visiter, Wake. ham, Newfoundland ; Dorado, Darlin, 'Bordeaux ; Emigrant, Petrie, Quebec ; Agnes Primrose, Johnston, Jamaica ; Ann, Blackie, Africa ; Doric, Newfoundland ; Canton, Gibson, Bombay ; John Stamp, Young, Bombay ; Miranda, Alexan dria ; San Pelbro, Santander ; Prins Christen Frederick, Neelson, Dantzic ; Trafalgar, Forster, Cork ; Planter, Man ning, wansea ; Rebecca and Maria, M'Carthy, Tralce ; William and Maria, George, Milford. ENTERED FOR LOADING, SEPT. 28. The Sportsman, Hutchinson, for Aux Cayes ; Lowell Wilson, Boston; Rapid, Simons, Bahia; Mary, Hamilton ; Halifax ; Dryope, Hamilton, Pernambuco ; Indian, Borth. wick, Pernambuco; Magistrate, Taylor, Puerto Cabello ; Eliza, Sierra Leone. CLEARED OUTWARDS, SEPT. 28. The Phcebe, M'May, for Dantzic ; George, Wright, Maran. ham ; Mary Queen of Scots, Kelley, Pernambuco; Liver. pool, Nixon, Konigsburg ; Liverpool, Rome, Bahia; Andro. meda, Latimer, Barbadoes. TELEGRAPHED. Wind S.W.—OfF Holyhead, inward bound, the John Bar ing, from New Orleans; Cecilia, Quebec; Roscoe, New York. EAST INDIA. The Hibernia, Gillies, from Bengal, in the Downs—sailed from Calcutta 10th April, Saugur 13th, Simon's Bay 20th July, and St. Helena 12th August. Passengers:—Mrs. Anderson, Mrs. Chapman, Mrs. Baker, Mrs. Boulton, Mrs. Fry, two Miss Boultons, T. C. Plowden, Esq., C. S. (died at sea), Licut. Anderson, 11th Dragoons, Dr. Chapman, 16th Lancers, Mr. Agnew, Dr. Rhynd, H.C. S., Mr. H. Love well, Dr. Baker, Mr. L. J. Bacon, Horse Artillery, Rev. Mr. Lowrie, Mr. Prince. The Joen Stump, Young, from Bombay, off Holyhead; sailed 13th May, and from St. Helena 12th August.—Passengers :—Mrs. Long and tw o children, Licut. Wm. Long, Bth Regiment, Capt. T. Gidley, Dr. R. H. Hunter, 2d Queen's. Royals.---The Mary, Miller, from the South Seas, in the Downs—sailed from Timor the 6th April, Mauritius 22d May. Arrivals at Bombay.—The Ernoad, May 25, from Bushire ; the H. C. schooner Shannon, May 26, from Vengoorla; the William Royder, from China. Departures from Bombay.—The Golconda, May 26, for China ; the Sultana, May 26, for Singapore and China. Departures from Madras—The Earl of Balcarras, May 18, for China. Arrivals at Calcutta.—Thc Matilda, May 11, from Liver pool ; the Tamarlane, from London. Arrivals at Batavia.—The Eleanor, Havelock, May 27, from London. SHIPS SPOKEN WITH.—The Zenobia, from London to Bengal, on Sept. 20, in lat. 47. 15. N., long. 9. 30. W., by the Vansittart; the Lady Nugent, from London to Van Die men's Land, on Aug. 18, in lat. 10. N., long. 25. W., by the Surrey; the Eliza, from Rotterdam to Batavia, on June I,in the Straits of Sunda, by the Vansittart ; the Midas from Lon.. don to the Mauritius, on Sept. 13, in lat. 40. N., long. 17. W. by the Miranda; the Robert Small, from London to Calcutta, on Aug. 24, in lat. 13. N., long. 24. W. ; the Mount Stuart Elphinstone, from London to Calcutta, on Aug. 12, in lat. 1. 30. S., long. 23. 38. W. ; the Augustus, from Marseilles to the Mauritius, on July 7, off the Cape, by the Tapley ; the Minerva, from Bristol to the Mauritius ' on Aug. ' 14, in lat. 13. N., long. 18. W. • the Hindoo, from Liverpool to Bombay, on June 27, off the Cape ; the Favourite, from London to Timor, on Aug. 8, in lat. 6. 14. N., long. 22. W., by the Richard Walker. Mr. Ducrow has made arrangements at Newcastle for the erection of a magnificent amphitheatre, which will be completed by Christmas. STRIKE OF THE ENGINEERS.—For several days past the neighbourhood of Lambeth has been in complete up roar, in consequence of the workmen of Napier and Co., the engineers in the Belvedere-road, Lambeth, having struck for an increase of wages. Since the " strike," which took place on Wednesday week, the men daily parade the streets ad joining, and in the evening visit the public-houses to ascer tain the feeling of other men upon the subject. A strong body of police is constantly upon the spot, to prevent assualts being committed by the refractory parties upon those workmen whom Messrs. Napier had since taken into their employment. A short time since the men in the employment of Messrs. Mauds lay, engineers, of the Westminster-road, struck upon the same grounds, and gained their point ; and upon the present occa sion are assisting the men in question. The grounds of the strike are as follow :—The men work a limited number of hours, and if employed after six in the evening receive extra payment ; they have lately considered that they were not suffi ciently remunerated for their " over-time" labour, and de manded an increase, to which Messrs. Napier objected, and supplied themselves with a number of men from the factory of Messrs. Seaward, at Limehouse. The whole of the parties are, however, expected to return to their employment, Messrs. Napier having, it is said, acceded to their terms."—Morning Paper. GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE. The architects of North Britain have been fortunate in their designs for the adornment of Westminster by the proposed new Houses of Parliament. One of them, Mr. Hamilton of Glasgow, ob tained one of the four prizes awarded by the Commissioners, and another, Mr. Gillespie Graham, of Edinburgh, sent in a design which, though it did not receive a prize, was spoken of by Mr. Hanbury Tracy in the House of Commons on the 91st of July in the following terms :—" He was willing indeed to admit that the exhibition of those drawings had furnished in contestible evidence of the great progress which had been made in Gothic architecture ; he was convinced that there were some drawings, and particularly one from the north of the Tweed which in point of beauty and of knowledge had never been surpassed, and, as he believed, never would be sur passed." Yesterday an accident which was likely to have proved fatal in its consequences, took place in Turnmill-street, Clerkenwell. It appeared that Mr. Fraser, of the Penton sille-road, was passing along the street, when a large garden pot, which had been placed with several others on the sill of a second floor window, without a guard to prevent accident, fell from its situation, and falling upon his head, he was knocked down in a state of insensibility, his hat being cut through, and his head wounded in a severe manner. Some passengers as sisted him to a surgeon's shop, where every attention was af forded him, and the injury dressed. On being restored to his senses, he proceeded to the owner of the room from the win_ dow of which the pot had fallen to remonstrate with him on the impropriety of having such things negligently placed with out a proper guard, b u t he could get no satisfaction, and was uncivilly treated, on which he repaired to Hatton-garden office for advice how to act on the occasion, but nothing could be done for him there, and he was advised to apply to the Con.- missioners of Pavements, and indict the owner of the room for suffering a dangerous nuisance, as he could - not swear that any body threw the flower pot upon him. He stated that just after the pot fell upon him, a cat was thrown out of the window, which fell upon the head of another person, and nearly stunned him, and the doctor told applicant that had it not been for the protection of his hat he would have been killed upon the spot. He expressed his determination to prosecute the party as an example to others, and check the dangerous practice. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MARLBORO UGH-STREET. Sarah Moore, a middle-aged woman, was brought before Mr. CHAMBERS, charged with having broken a window in the shop of Mr_ Robert Westwood, jeweller, Princes -street, and stolen a gold watch, value 301. In defence the prisoner said it was true she had stolen the watch, and she did it with the view of being taken into custody, for in her miserable condition she was better in than out of prison.—Committed for trial, HATTON-GARDEN. Yesterday James Cujling, a potatoe dealer, residing in Pentonville-road, appeared to a summons, at the instigation of Mr. Haywood, a churchwarden of the parish of St. James's, Clerkenwell, charged with having exercised his worldly calling on the Sabbath-day, contrary to Act of Parliament. Mr. Rickets, an assistant churchwarden, said the defen dant's shop was one of the greatest nuisances in the parish. A constable proved that the defendant's shop was open at twenty minutes after eleven o'clock. The defendant, who treated the matter with much indif ference, did not deny having kept open his shop. Mr. Haywood pressed for a conviction as an example to others, and the defendant was convicted in the penalty of ss. and costs, 10-len he laughed, and paid the money. It was stated outside the office that small shopkeepers cleared more by their Sunday morning's traffic than by any other day in the week, which enabled them to pay the pe nalty with ease. UNION-HALL. Yesterday Richard Stowell, holdinc , a respectable situa tion in the St. Katherine Docks, and Richard Taylor, a labourer in the same place, were charged with stealing a tarpaulin, the property of the Company. Stowell had nothing to say to the charge. The other prisoner said that he acted under the orders of his superior. --Both prisoners were remanded. Williani Delany was charged with breaking into the house of a man named Norman, of Edmond-street, Cam berwell, and stealing a large silver cruet-stand, and some plated candlestick. A witness was examined, who saw the prisoner lurking about Norman's house on the night of the robbery, and that she afterwards saw him in the act of getting out of one of the windows, but that he effected the act with such dexterity, and got away so quickly, that there was not time to give him into custody. Inspector Walters said that Norman was not in attend ance. He was a very poor man, and it was a matter of some surprise how a man in his circumstance could become possessed of articles such as those stolen from his house. He added that the prisoner and Norman were acquaint ances, which still increased the doubts as to whom the silver articles really belonged. The MAGISTRATE gave direciions that Delany might be kept in custody, and that Norman, the supposed owner of the property might be desired to attend, when the case, which was involved in some mystery, would be properly in vestigated. LAMBETH-STREET. Yesterday Mr. Lewis Castello, a Spaniard, of gentle manly appearance, who described himself to be a school master, was brought before the Magistrates, and charged with having committed a most violent assault upon two police-constables, while in the act of taking him to the sta tion-house. On the preceding evening the prisoner called at the shop of Mr. Mendoza, in Rosemary-lane, and in a very autho ritative manner demanded a light for his cigar, with which he was accommodated. He then called for a second and a third light, and ultimately for pen, ink, and paper, and on being refused he became very violent, and forced the door in. A policeman came up at the time, and he was given into custody, but he refused to stir a step with him. Being told that force would be used to compel him he consented to follow the constable, provided he walked before him. The policeman, in order to gratify him, did so, but he had not proceeded far when the defendant gave him a violent blow on the back of the head with a crutch, with which he is obliged to walk, which knocked him down. Driscoll, an other policeman, came up at the instant, and he too got very roughly handled, and, it is feared, seriously injured, by the defendant, who swore that if he had such fellows in his own country he would drink their blood. The defendant pleaded intoxication as some extenuation for his conduct, which he said was by no means so violent as had been represented. The magistrates convicted the defendant in the highest penalty of five pounds, or two months' imprisonment. W 0 R SHIP- STREET. A Jew, named Simmons, was charged, under rather sin gular circumstances, with stealing a silk handkerchief and two gold rings from Mr. Denton, a pawnbroker. The prisoner went to the shop on Tuesday to redeem the rings, which lie had pawned some . time since, and the witness having brought them " down the spout," placed them on the counter ; but, while his head was turned away for a moment, the prisoner caught them up and walked off. He was taken into custody on Wednesday evening. Police constable 13G U, who apprehended the prisoner, produced the rings and handkerchief, which he delivered up when taken. The prisoner asserted that when he took his property off the prosecutor's counter, he put down the money to redeem them, 10s. 2d., principal and interest. This, however, the prosecutor positively denied. Mr. TWYFORD must commit for the felony, and let the prisoner make his defence before a Jury. The depositions were accordingly taken and the prisoner committed for trial ; but two magistrates (Mr. Twyford and Mr. Grove) afterwards consented to admit him to bail. KENSINGTON PETTY SESSIONS. ASSAULT. - LE GATT/E V. O'HABA. Yesterday a decent-looking female, named O'Mara, por tress at Earl's-terrace, Kensington, attended before H. G. Conn, Esq., the sitting Magistrate, to answer the com plaint of M. Le Gattie, residing at No. 18, Pembroke. square, Kensington. The complainant, a dapper little Frenchman, well be whiskered and mustachioed, addressed the worthy Magis trate as " My for Judge, you sail know vat I say, for nobody sail tell you de truth but me. Last Friday nite, I vas going for de valk. It was ten of de clock. I see de Ma dame O'Hara, so I say Madame O'Hara, you sail get fifty pount, for de false informer you make of me, through a leetel pottel of oil—you sail I say. Vat for I say you re port me to MOnsieur Atkinson, de perfumer, dat I sell oil under his name.' So she slap me face, and she did so again ven I take de stick in me hand, and I strike at Madame O'Hara, but de sword fall out, and I keep it in me hand so, to keep her off (putting himself in a fencing attitude), and I run down Edward-square, calling police,' but no one did come, so I vent to my domicile, and dat is de truth me for Judge." He then called a lad named English, who corroborated his statement relative to his face having been slapped ; but after a deal of equivocation he at last acknowledged he was not present at the commencement of the affray. Mrs. O'Hara, in her defence, declared the whole of the defendant's statements were a tissue of falsehoods from be ginning to end. The fact was, that on her return from town on Friday night she was informed by her daughter that the complainant had for some hours been pacing to and fro on the outside of the terrace gate, with a stick in his hand. Shortly before ten o'clock she went to close the gate, when the complainant came up to her, and, calling her by the most opprobrious names, struck her so vio lently over the head with his stick as almost to stun her, and she produced her bonnet, which was bent by the force of the blow. He then beat her over the arm shamefully with his stick, from which he eventually drew a sword, which he flourished at her, and on her calling out for the police he ran away down Edward-square, crying " Police" all the way. In answer to a question from the Magis trate, she said, while suffering from the blows she might slapped the complainant's face, but she was not aware she had done so. A female of respectable appearance, who declared s h e was a strange r t o b ot h p ar ti es , was passing at the moment the affair commenced, of which she gave a similar descrip tionto the defendant's. Mr. CODD immediately told the complainant he had failed in proving his case, and ordered Mrs. O'Hara to be discharged. REQUESTS COURT, WESTMINSTER. DANIEL BULGRUDDERY V. DANIEL BULGRUDDERY. Yesterday, when the officer of the Court called these euphonious patronymics, two stout fellows, whose wearing apparel gave testimony that they were hod-and-mortar men, and no mistake, stood before the Bench, and began to state their cases together. CommissioNEß-- - -Stop, stop a little. Pray which of you is the complainant ? The Bulgrudderies—We're both com plainants, your Honour, if you mane by such a word that we have to make complaints of each other. COMMISSIONER—WeII, one at a time. Come, Daniel with the blue coat, what have you to say ? Daniel—l have to say, Sir, that this fellow here with the greasy jacket owes me W. Bs. ; and, moreover, that he is the greatest villain that ever I seed, for he is afther robbing me and his own father. _ _ COMMISSIONER—You are his father, then, I suppose ? May the Lord forbid. To the best of my belief and recol lection I am not.—(A laugh.) COMMISSIONER—Are you his uncle, then ? Daniel— Indeed, faith, I'm not. COMMISSIONER—HOW do you stand, then ; for there is a great family likeness between you ? Daniel—That's only on the outside of our count ena n c es, your W o rship ; btu since you spoke of a family likeness, I am afraid I have the misfortune to be connected with him at a great distance off entirely, in regard of his mother.--(Laughter.) COMMISSIONER—Let us hear how he owes you the money. Daniel—Plaze your honour, Sir, last Patricks day, this fellow here walked into my cellar in a manner that was disgraceful to his counthry, for you could put on his clothes with a pitch fork. He told me that he was afther running away from his father in Ireland, afther stealing a firkin of butter from the ould man, and that be was afther spending all the money all to five shillings. was ashamed to let my wife look at him, saving your b' Hour's presence, he was tattered and torn to such a de': &Tree ; so I made her buy fi v e y ar d s and a half of the best corderoy, at 2s. 7d. a yard, and lining for the same , at one ;and a halfpenny a yard ; then I gave eight shillings to tailor for making the clothes fit for any gintleman , 2 n d sould the breeches then to him for six and twenty sbillinT to be paid me by forestalm e nts o f one shilling a w ee Then my wife she bought three and a half yards of calico , at sevenpence halfpenny a yard, and stood up a n ights t° make a shirt for him, for his linen was of the colour of an ould hat, and the little that remained of it was hanging n ° ore like bullrushes out of the bottom of an ould chair. over I gave him board, diet, washing, and lodging, for g four months, at eight shillings a week, to be paid just as be liked ; and, to crown all, I used my interest to get h il l situation, which he houlds up to the present day ; this is my thratement, afther all. gay to COMMISSIONER—WeII, Daniel, what have you to your namesake ? Daniel, the defendant—Why, Sir, ke had worn these same trowsers often before I left Ireland, and he sold them to me because they were too little fo r himself. They cost him 245. ;he charged me 261. and paid him 20s. in silver down in one slap. As for the boort:, and lodging, I ped him in work and money long ago, An to a few shillings. COMMISSIONER—You are a Catholic, I suppose ? 1)a• niel—l am, and my father before me. COMMISSIONER—Have you any objection to swear to what you said ? Daniel—Not the laste in life, Sir. ~ COMMISSIONER—And you, the other Daniel, will r take your oath to what you have said ? The other Dalne —That's all I want, Sir ; hand me the book. I'm sure WI oath is as good as his any day. Daniel, the elder, however, staggered as the Bible was banded to him, and, after collecting his confused rernirns‘ ceves as to the " forestalments," he grumbled out his ac • quiescence to take ten shillings for the balance of clothes, board, washing, and lodging, and walked out of the Court, swearing that he would never again have any thing to d o with his villain of a namesake or a dog belonging to hill' bi it CORONERS' INQUEST. Yesterday afternoon an inquest was holden at the Ge°,_ r g: public-house in Old -street, St. Lukes, before Mr. na"!': the coroner, on the body of Mr. John Bishop, a tobacco?' in that neighbourhood, who had shot himself. John 5 3115 ' bury, a tobacco-pipe maker, had known the deceased Wu ° was about 45 years of age, and had a wife and 9 c hildren' for many years. He was generally of a very i r ritable eh' position, and very violent when under the influence of licl u°r a of which he drank very freely. At one time the deceas e used to go a good deal into society, and kept high COra" pany, and not being able from his circumstances lately t° do so, it preyed much on his mind, and caused him , doubt to drink freely of brandy. On Tuesday e vening elf, (witness) was informed that the dec e as e d h a d - shot him and on going into his bed-room on th e fi rs t fl o or, be S aco him lying on his back on the bed, and his head s mashed t° atoms. He observed the daughter of the deceased take,a pistol from the floor by the b e d- s id e , w hi c h h a d eviden t i been just discharged, and he had no doubt the deeea se , h had fired the contents through his bead, a n d th a t his de a " must have been instantaneous. He had no doubt that 1 1 4 was not of sound mind for some time pa s t, but he co ° t not account for the cause of his committinc , the act, exceP the disordered state of his mind, which was brought on by intoxication. The Jury returned a verdict " That the ceased hed shot himself while labouring under temPor A " in sanity." MADRID IN 1835, BY AN ENOWSH OFFICER. We have been delighted with the perusal of this excellent work. It is certainly the best commentary upon the Spar character in all its singular varieties that e v er appeared print. When the author describes a palace he shows us so its inmates, a tertulia, and we have a characteristic conver se , tion, a bull fight, and we see the audience ranged before 11 , hear their remarks, and almost share with them the exciteme nt of the scene. The churches have their processions, the „ their promenaders, his powers of delineation are of the WI highest order; every thing is just, every thing is brilliant. TELEGRAPH BETWEEN LONDON AND LIVE R ; pooL.—lt is in cont em pl a ti on , we un d erstan d, to es tablish system of telegraphi c commun i cat i on , b ot h b y d ay an d nig o on the great railroads now in formation, more particulart i % the London and Birmi ng h am an d G ran d J unct i on li nos . r y) utility of such an arrangement is at once a pp aren t . It will of immense advantage to all parties connected with the 11 in conveying rapid and accurate information of the apPre B ",i and departure of the various trains, both of passengers 0.0 merchandise, fro m one ex t rem i ty o f t h e li ne to t h e o therf r ' d , that the speed of t rave lli ng can b e th ere b y regu l ate d ace: o f ing to circumstanc es . I n case o f acc id ents , a l so , i t w ill be l3‘ infinite s e r v i ce i n p rocur i ng ass i stance ; w hil e , f or co nveys timely notice of damaged machinery, or any event libel co impede the uninterrupted passage of the lines, its conyeni en o , will be peculiarly a c ce pt a bl e . B u t it s a d van t ages , in a e° t o f mercial point of view, by bringing the two greatest silar,t g b i o commerce in the British empire, London and Li ver pool, ° IS a few minut es ' commun i ca ti on o f eac h ot h er , are m ore lat e culable and mighty than any other. This will, indeed , na consummating the fabled idea of annihilating time t a to space." The plans and arrangements for the working 01 , 1 by telegraph have, we understand, been proposed and srrang er e'l f .. Lieutenant Watson, superintendent of the Liverpool and ll ° ' o f head Telegraph, and report speaks highly of the simplic it y the whole arrangement. The Western Times of Saturday aives the f ,, c)1 ,1 lowing acco u nt o f an ac t o f p enance a t Exeter :—Our church at St. Ol ave was th e scene o f cons id era bl e bosti ell io, excitement this morning, in con sequence o f H en ry Ter io " g of this city, h av i ng b een a dj u d ge d to d o penance , f o r ca his sister-in-law, Mrs. Charlotte Heath, several narnes,„ , . o g, pugning her ch as tity. Th e R ev . M r . Bi rc h, an d Mr. P,",k, the churchwarden, were i n a tt en d ance as ear l y as 10 o'ci ci res t and the anxious audience, which was composed of a g fl is number of butchers, and other p ersona l f r i en d s o f the e co "'l. tent, together with a considerable portion o f the agr, tural interest, who were attracted to the sp o t f ro m its vie l t io to the market. The penitent was dressed in a white fussed coatee, breeches, and gaiters to match, b u t was not arli. in a white sheet, according to a popular notion. The r", , tent repeated the following words of the c l er gyman t I Henry Turpin, do hereby acknowledge a n d co nfess t° 5 0 , 4 , have abused and defamed the said Charlotte Heath, bY n , bet ing that she is a black bastard.—, &c., for which I beg a nd pardon, and promise no more for the future to defam e o id, abuse her again in the like manner." The culprit the t a ll "it was all true, but the truth must not be spoken l a d o dd times ;" on which the Rev. Gentleman said th a t he woolen be the statement of the penitent, if h e re p ea t e d it, and t" t ion• would have to go through it again before the congreg e f t he The Rev. Gentleman was s o a ff ec t e d by th e enormitY2oself words, that Mr, Turpin was obliged to say them for " e d le the second time. The " congregati on " were not lee lao der like manner for they seemed to think th a t M r . Turpin 's 9 „ s ub' and Mrs. Heath's rep u t a ti on were no t t h e mos t 5 01 ° 1 with jects to be settled at church, and joined in the ceremony much fun and merriment. of On Sunday evening a chiffonier found in a 1 2,, ea bo P be ' rubbish, in the Rue Serpente, a packet, containing tu l- v ing• I v it - - -•-• , of a newly-born child, still warm, and believed to „, :n g He ran to fetch the commissary o f p o li ce , i ns tead of tai` a ' t t he to the Ecole de Medicine; but when the officer arrived , end of an hour, the child had ceased to live. (ADVERTISEMENT. 11 PATENT LEVER w A TC- et ) With silver double-bottom cases 6 l a 6 6 With silver hunting cases This celebrated construction (the most accurate on vou entZ watch can be made) is now offered, with the latest in l Pr ° ca ppe d ' i. e. the detached escapement, jewelled in four holF0L„,D00, by hand to mark the seconds, hard enamel dial, and maintanr: `GOA to continue going while winding up, at the above price , Lo bo- SAVORY, Working Silver and Goldsmith, 47, Aliur 3 "` °f BIRTHS. On the 25th inst., at Clarendon Park, Lady Harvey 1 33 ' a dahr. o f S. 11. " O ug n the 27th inst, at Denston House, Suffolk, the l ad y Benyon, Esq., of Ash, Salop, of a son and heir. herd , On the 27th inst., at Bath , the lady of P. C. Sh e p of a daughter. dthe WIC On the 24th inst., at Fairfield , House, near Sheffield- of A. Gossett, Esq., Royal Horse Artillery, of a daughter. 13 N . ' On the 26th inst. , at Bath , the lady of Captain Lysaglit' of a son. of COtlin On the 2Sth inst., at Bryanstone-square, the lad. Probyn, of a daughter. MARRIED. y On the 28th inst., at St. M ar aret's, Westminster, th e - d -e t nie . B. Hone, Vicar of Hales-Owen, g Salop to Frances , y ounger ter of J.:Rickman, Esq., House of Commons. On the 28th inst. a t Walthamstow,Esses,Edmund Bark to g to younger son of Robert Ray, Esq. of Grove House, Edro o 4, - .: of Frances, younge s t daughter of William Tooke Robinson, Walthamstow. L i o collY On the 27th inst., at St. John's Church, Stamford, Dee piog;. shire, John MolecevTwi , r e Molecey, Esq of Markst fob to o f the to Eliza, second daii'ghter'o g f Francis Simpso"n, Esq. place. DIED. o bter At Belton House, near Grantham, Anna Alaria, eldest do hr of the Hon. and Rev. Henry and Lady Anna Maria Cust, Joe On the 25th inst., at Lendel , York, Maria, daughter of Colonel Roger Morris. On the 27th inst., at Hillingdon, Mrs. Rigby. London: Printed and Publishe d by MURDO YO!l s• • co oli 112, Strand, at The Sun Office, No. Strati, 111 of Middlesex. —Friday, September 30, 1836. ~..