The Sun. — London, England, 1836-01-15 00:00:00

in a strong Hibernian accent, to a little coterie in the vicinity of the Law Courts, "it's all as good as settled any how. Sir John Campbell, who was as fierce as a lion yestetilky, and terribly frightened Lord Mel bourne and Spring Rice, lest he'd cut the painter, is to-day as quiet as a mouse. And why should'nt he ? If he has'nt got promotion, sure his Lady has. There's Pepys made a Peer—and Bickersteth made a Peer, and Lady .Campbell called up to the House of Lords." So spoke the honest Hi bernian, forgetting that the proposition for a female Parliament, which had been suggested by some Court Ladies in Queen Elizabeth's time, has not yet been realized, rand consequently that the Lady who has been made a Peeress, does not become a hereditary legislator by virtue of her patent of nobility. To treat this subject in a more serious mood, we may ask why is it that Sir John Campbell has twice allowed his claims as Attorney-General to be superseded ? and the same question may be asked of Sir R. Rolfe, the Solicitor-General, who had the next right to the offer of any piece of preferment declined by Sir J. Campbell. The chief value which hitherto attached to the offices of Attorney and Solicipr-General consisted in their conferring upon their possessors prior claims to pro motion over those of all other competitors, which claims the Administration for the time being was bound to recognise. We believe that Sir John Campbell is the first Attorney-General whose claims have been passed over not once, but twice, by the Ministry under whom he accepted that office. And, indeed, in accepting the office, Sir John Campbell conferred a favour upon Ministers, rather than received one ; for, setting politics aside, his abilities, learning, and general attainments qualify him for a far more honourable post than that of first law-officer of the most incapable Administra tion that England has almost ever seen. The Standard describes Sir John Campbell rightly, when it describes him as a sound and able lawyer ; he is, indeed, one of the soundest and ablest lawyers of tae present day. Though, for so eminent a barrister, his politics have latterly savoured too strongly of the Whig-Radical flavour, and though the election for Stafford make it an awkward thing for him to declaim against corruption in other boroughs, yet his personal character as a member of an honourable profession is above stain or reproach, and, to use the words of our respected contemporary, he " has borne his faculties in an invidious office most meekly." We believe no Attorney-General has had less to do with political prosecutions, either against the Press or in any other way, which is all the better for his fame, and affords the strongest possible evidence of the good sense and discretion with which he exercises his official powers. We have admitted that the practice of placing Com mon Law lawyers at the head of Equity Courts is a bad one as a general rule, though' it must be allowed that Lord Lyndhurst is a recent and splendid instance of a Common Law lawyer becoming, in a very short time, a high authority in Equity. Such instances, however, of extraordinary aptitude for both Common Law and Equity are not to be calculated upon. But we do not believe this was the reason why Ministers did not appoint Sir John Campbell either to the office of Lord Chancellor or the Mastership of the Rolls. The fact is his abilities and reputation as a lawyer are so necessary to them in his present office that they feared his promotion would be another step towards hastening their downfall : so they readily sacri ficed his claims to their own political interests. Sir John Campbell, no doubt; felt it so when he intimated to them his intention to resign—a resignation which was only prevented by the offer and acceptance of a Peerage for Lady Campbell. We must confess it is our opinion that Sir John Campbell would have con sulted better for his own dignity and that of the office which he holds, if he did not allow any such " sop" to prevent him from carrying his intended resignation into effect. Admitting that Sir C. Pepys was the best inan that the Whigs could have selected of their own party to make Lord Chancellor, and that the Mastership of the Rolls ought to be filled by an Equity lawyer, why vas not the Solicitor-General: appointed to that office? Sir R. Rolfe is an Equity lawyer, has never been any thing else than an Equity lawyer—why, we ask, was he passed over as well as the Attorney-General for the vacant seat in the Rolls' Court ? Was it the dread of a Conservative succeeding him in his Parliamentary seat, and thereby giving another proof before the meeting of Parliament of the re-action in public opi nion against the Melbourne-O'Connell Ministry ? We know not what the reason was; we only know that. the reason given by the Ministerial Journals for not appointing the Attorney-General to the Rolls' Court does not apply to the case of the Solicitor-General, whose claims have been set aside to make way for a non-official personage. It is not for an instant to be supposed that Sir C. Rolfe disdains the Rolls' Court, and the coronet which Sir John Campbell would not have refused, and which Mr. Bickersteth receives. The whole of those arrangements—especially the three Peerages, and the circumstance of one of them being extorted from Government through dread of a resignation —tend among other things to show that the Administration is in a most insecure and ricketty con dition, while its efforts to conceal its feebleness only reveal the infirmities that precede its dissolution.— Morning Herald. There were various rumours in circulation up to a late hour last night respecting a fresh hitch in the new legal arrangements. It was affirmed in many quarters that Sir John Campbell had really resigned, disgusted at the ingratitude of the Melbourne Cabinet in over looking his pretensions after his ultra speeches at Edinburgh in support of Whig-Radical principles. We doubt, however, the truth of this intelligence, as Sir John, with the proverbial shrewdness of his coun trymen, would be too cautious to throw away a good thing because he had not obtained the Chancellor ship, the darling object of his ambition, and the office for which he would be most unfit. We incline to think, therefore, that Sir John Campbell is still Attor ney-General. The Globe says that " the further ar rangements in view will include Sir John Campbell in a manner befitting his high claims." We confess that we should not have comprehended this enigma tical announcement, had not The Sun thrown some light on the subject in a pithy paragraph, from which we learn that " Lady Campbell is to be created a Peeress."—Morning Post. A Ministerial Contemporary asks, " Why did the Tories throw out in 1834 a. Bill for the settlement of the tithes in Ireland, on the very principle of the Bill introduced by Sir Henry Hardinge ?" It might with as much fairness he asked, Why did the Tories allow, only seven hours of daylight on the twenty-first of last March ?"• No such Bill as that described was ever presented to the Tories in 1834. The Bill thrown out in 1834 was to take the pro perty of the Church away, and in lieu thereof to give the Church a charge upon the Consolidated Fund—a Government pension, in short, which the House of Commons, whenever it pleased, might re fuse the Government the means of paying. Was there anything like this " principle" (what a vile pros titution of the word) in Sir H. Hardinge's Bill ? Cer tainly there was nothing of the kind ; and yet quarterly, monthly, weekly, daily, in every place and in every way that falsehood can be palmed upon the public instead of truth, is it audaciously pretended that the Whig Bill in 1834 was essentially the same as the Con servative Bill of 1835. It is impossible to believe that any one capable of thinking at all can be so ob tuse as not to see the difference between the two Bills. The one was, as we have stat e d, f or con fi scat i ng a charge upon all cultivated lands—a property so ancient, that, in the legal phrase, the memory of man runneth not to the contrary--for confiscating this, and for giv ing in exchange a Government pension, which must, from t h e nature of the fund on which it was leviable, depend upon the will of a democratic assembly—an assembly which, thank God, is not yet either the So vereign or the Legislature of this realm. The other was for giving a landed property in lieu of the certain tenth of an uncertain produce, or, in lieu of some tem porary composition for that tenth. Where is the icier' City, or similarity of " principle," between these two eases ? t he violent an d extravagant answer, which ee our/ contemporary it se lf suppl i es to t h e gOstipri it a:s4...4sufficiently sh ows t h at no inter ende of truth, reason, or moderation prevented the eestion or the answer from bein g o f t h e worst type of coargi'Radicaligrr.„ The Tories, w e are told, did not pass - the Whig,Bil.l4f 1834, " because they wished to ' k ,, produce disunion and bloodshed." Mild, considerate Whig journalist I We have some curiosity to know, —but we never can know—whether the writers of such outrageous stuff as this ever persuade themselves, by reiterated impudence of assertion, that there is any thing like the shadow of a possibility of an acciden tal and remote resemblance to truth ever being found in what they assert. The Conservatives wishing to pro duce bloodshed ! .This from the authors of the hor rors of Bristol and Nottingham—from the allies or slaves of O'Connell, who calculates upon assassina tion as an essential, or at the least, an important, part of the policy by which he reigns in Ireland ? It is in deed modest—very modest. How depraved must be the moral sentiment as well as the taste of those who read such gross and absurd calumnies without indig nation !—Morning Post. It has been announced in a paragraph, which has made the circuit of the daily papers, that Mr. D. Sa lomons is about to offer himself as a candidate for Marylebone, on the popular interest, in the con tingency of Mr. H. L. Bulwer resigning his seat, — a contingency which, it is understood, will not be much delayed beyond the opening of the Session. Even should the vacancy not occur by that means, it must inevitably occur in a very short period after the opening of the Session by a dissolution of Parliament —a measure which the stupidly-avowed determination of the Obstructives to impede the march of the Go vernment, will probably compel the Ministry to resort to. It is not likely that Lord Melbourne's Cabinet indeed should consent to run the gauntlet of harassing opposition from the " agitating" faction of the Tories ; and at the same time consent to fight the battle with weapons of the enemy's own selecting, or, in other words, with a Parliament packed by the Tories them selves. Under these circumstances, we are glad to hear of a popular candidate being already in the field. We are pleased too that the demonstration is made in the person of Mr. Salomons, who may be said in -one respect, whose cause may be said to be identified ,with the great cause of civil and religious liberty— who has himself ably and boldly fought, we may say, two battles already in its favour, in the last of which nothing was lost but the honour of his opponents — and who has given pledges of his political principles which ought to rally round him every class of popular Reformer„ from the Whig to the Whig-Radical, and from the latter to the extreme Radicals, who con stitute a large portion of the constituency of Maryle bone. The earliness with which the new Candidate has entered the field, and thrown himself into the van of the approaching combat, is an earnest of that vigilance, sincerity, and vi go ur o f con d uct which he has already demonstrated, and which, if ever they were necessary on any occasion, are more emphatically necessary, now, in the approaching elec tion for Marylebone. We have laid before our readers, in a former article, the reasons for this para mount necessity—both as regards early activity and un usual exertion. We have now to repeat the leading topic of our former appeal. There is not a minute of time to be lost by the friends of the popular cause. As far as Marylebone is concerned, the Obstructives have followed the advice of their great leader in point both of agitation and registration, and in both to a most effectual purpose. We believe, as we stated be fore, that a more consummate organization, by means of central and subordinate Committees, for electioneering purposes, have never existed than that which the Tories have been long combining and maturing in the borough of Marylebone. Every species of influence, direct and indirect, in which property could be employed, has been employed at the West-end of the town, to seduce, to silence, to intimidate, or to corrupt ; and it has been, we are sorry to say, for the want of a similar alertness and organization •on the part of the Reformers, too successful. The Tories are perfectly aware, both of the perfection to which they have brought this machinery and of its success ; although they have had the wisdom to repress their usual tendency to boast, in order to conceal the- ammunition they have in store for th@ir opponents, when the tug of war comes, behind the masked battery or blank rampart of apparent inactivity. They are aware of it, and it has prompted their ambition to take a wider range it its grasp than they at first intended. Already the same manmuvres at the West have found, by anticipation, a new occu pant for the vacated or abdicated seat of Burdett for Westminster, in the person of Sir Thomas Cochrane ; and they not only aspire to substitute Lord Teign mouth for Mr. H. Bulwer in Marylebone, but they boast of being able to return another Conservative re presentative in the room of Sir Samuel Whalley. Why do we iterate these things ? Is it to dispirit 'our friends ? Far from it. It is to incite them and put them on their guard. Is it to encourage the people's foes ? Far from it. It is to let them understand that we know every small wheel of the movements of the ma chine, the ingenious and powerful play of which they have thought with so much crafty secrcsy to conceal. The avowal of truth, moreover, is always the best policy—it is always best to know one's danger ; and to look at the dark side as well as the bright side of the picture. Nor is there the slightest reason for despondency. " Throw but a stone, the giant dies." All that are wanted, as we said before, are three things —system, union, and immediate action. Select an independent Reformer at once in the room of Mr. H. Bulvver—respecting whom all the sec tions of the popular party, Ministerial and otherwise, may join hands, and round whom they may rally with all their heart and all their strength. Then for " a long pull, a strong • pull, and a pull altogether," and the battle will be won. Does Mr. Sheriff Sa lomons answer the terms of our preceding description of an unexceptionable candidate for Marylebone ? We think he does ; and we have little doubt of his success under the provisions we have stated. But there is not a moment's time to be lost. An active canvass should be instituted directly—a. central Committee organized—and subordinate Com mittees appointed without delay. The old Committees of Sir W. Home and Mr. H. Bulwer, both Whig 'Reformers, might now unite operations ; nor is there any reason why they should not receive an accession of strength from that of Mr. Young, an independent Whig, • and from those of the extreme Liberals, who generally act with Mr. Murphy. W e h a v e a ll a com mon object—improved political institutions. Although we sometimes advance towards it by different lines of march, let us on this occasion rally under a common standard—" Union." Before undertaking that march, all feuds should be sacrificed, as of old, on a common altar—" our country." It is not meet that dissentions should exist among the chieftains of Reform, when the " Trojans are already in the trench, and Hector is thundering at the gate."—Morning Advertiser. KING'S BENCII,THURSDAY. POWER V. BARHAM. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL stated that this was an action to recover a sum of money paid to the defendant for the purchase of some pictures sold by him as the productions of Canaletti. These pictures had been described in the dealer's sale -note as " four pictures, Views in Venice—Canaletti." The cause was tried before Mr. Justice Coleridge, at the sittings at Westminster after last Term, and the Learned Judge left the Jury to say whether the representation did or did not amount to a warranty. Such a direction ought not to have been given to the Jury. He, therefore, submit ted that there should be a new trial.—Rule refused. BURKE V. FENN. The defendant in person applied for a rule for a nnewtrial in this c ase . Thi s was an action for an attorney , ? bill, in curred by the defendant when contesting the validity of the election of the old select vestry of St. Martin's-in-the-Fields. The greatest portion of the money claimed in the action had become due before action brought, and the defendant had pleaded the statute of limitations. A very large propor tion of the whole bill had been paid. Among the items in the bill were some for advice and information supplied by the plaintiff, under the direction of the defendant, to Mr. Douglas Kinnaird. Within six years before action brought, the plaintiff had written to demand payment, and the de fendant then forwarded a sum of money, sent by Mr. Kin naird's executors, to pay for the expense incurred on his account. That payment was given in evidence by the plain tiff, to take the case out of the statute of limitations. The defendant now contended that he had nothing to do with that payment, and ought not to be bound by it.--Rule refused. The COURT intimated that the special paper would be taken to-morrow (this day), and the Crown paper on Sa turday ; and that next week the new trial paper would be taken. The Court sat till nearly six o'clock. . • • • • , 1 THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY, JANUARY 15, 1836 more than six months ; to him a day was eternity. The Court would bear in mind the damages, and his solemnde claration of innocence, and would not, he was sure, appor tion the term prayed for by his Learned Friend. The Learned Chief Commissioner, after a short con sultation with his Learned colleagues, Commissioners Harris and Bowen, said that, in consequence of some in formalities in the insertion of an advertisement, the Court could not this day arrive at a final judgment. If the in solvent were guilty, he hoped he would show that contrition to which had often exhorted others—if innocent, that his innocence would be his support in his adversity. The Learned Commissioners ordered the case to stand adjourned. The case then stood adjourned. The insolvent cannot again appear for upwards of three weeks. COMMON PLEAS.-THURSDAY. CORNISH AND ANOTHER 17. KEENE AND ANOTHER. This was an action tried before the Lord Chief Justice at the Middlesex Sittings after last Term. It was brought to recover damages for an alleged infringement of a patent by the defendants, which the plaintiffs had obtained for the manufacture of Indian rubber web. The trial occupied the Court three entire days, and the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, with nominal damages of ls. Sir F. PoLLocx applied to the Court for a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial. The Court granted a rule Nisi. The case, which was fully reported at the time of the trial, is of interest only to the parties concerned. COLLINGWOOD V. SHEARMAN. This was an action of ejectment tried at the London Sit tings after the last Term before the Lord Chief Justice. It was an action of ejectment brought to the question whe ther the defendant had a right to erect certain stables in the rear of his premises (the Oxford Arms, in Warwick-lane), on part of the old wall of the City of London, situate at the back of Newgate prison. The jury found a verdict for the defendant. Mr. Sergeant WILDE applied to the Court for a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial. The COURT granted a rule Nisi. The COURT was occupied the whole day in hearing !no tions for new trials. EXCHEQUER COURT.-THURSDAY WAINWRIGHT V. BLAND. This was an action upon a life policy, brought against the Imperial Life Assurance Company, and tried at the sittings after last Term, before Lord Abinger. The trial, with the evidence at length, was reported in the course of last month. Mr. ERLE now moved for a Rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial had.—Rule refused. PREROGATIVE COURT. HALE V. ASTED AND PEARSON. In this case the testatrix, Mrs. Fanny Newsome, died on the 14th of December, 1833, leaving two sisters, a Mrs. Smith and a Mrs. Hinton, both, as well as the deceased, being of a very advanced acre. After the death of the testatrix, a regularly executed will, dated 26th of March, 1832, together with a codicil, were found, and likewise a draft-will, or instructions. The executors to the will of March, 1832, who were likewise the executors under the draft, intended to take probate of that of 1832, but it being found to refer to some other papers, in accordance with the usual practi c e, searc h was directed to be made ; several testamentary papers were discovered ; the opinion of Coun sel was taken in what manner the probate should be exe cuted ; and that opinion recommended that all the papers should be submitted to the judgment of the Court. Dr. LUSHINGTON was heard for the executors, and went into the affidavits at considerable length ; and Dr. ADDAMS was in part heard on the other side. INSOLVENT COURT-THURSDAY THE REV. MR. NEALE'S CASE. The Rev. Edward Pole Neale, sued as Edward Pole Neale, clerk, the late curate of West Hackney, came up this morning to be heard on his petition from the Fleet prison, praying to Le discharged. He was opposed by Mr. ROEBUCK, M.P., on the part of the Rev. Edward Birch (son of Alderman Birch), Rector of West Hackney, for the damages and costs in an action for criminal conversation. The application of the insolvent was supported by Mr. CooaE (with whom was Mr. WoopaoFFE). The case created intense interest. The Court was crowded to repletion. The schedule filed by the insolvent for inspection con tains eight creditors, whose debts -are stated at 8661. H e alleges he had not received consideration for nearly 600/., and in that sum 412/. 55., the damages and costs awarded in the action at the instance of the Rev. Mr. Birch, are in cluded. Mr. John Preston Neale, his father, is a creditor to a somewhat considerable amount. In juxta-position to the claim of Mr. Birch, the insolvent in his schedule has inserted a statement to the effect that lie admits the sum of 4121. 55., being 2001. damages, and the remainder for costs in the action for criminal conversation, of which offence he solemnly declares his innocence, and he attributes his insol vency to the verdict of the Jury passing against him. The opposition in this case was grounded under the 49th section of 7th Geo. IV. Mr. ROEBUCK appeared for Mr. Birch, in this peculiar and extraordinary case. He should merely put in the record. Mr. Charles John Tuteel was then called by the Learned Counsel. He was Clerk of the Judgments of the Court of Common Pleas,.and produced the record of the action, in which Edward Birch, clerk, was plaintiff, and Edward Pote Neale, clerk, defendant. The declaration, dated the 12th of January, 1835, was for criminal conversation with Mary Ann, the wife of the plaintiff. The plea was. " Not Guilty." The damages were laid, he said, at 2,0001. The action was tried before the Lord Chief Justice at West minster, in June last. The Jury gave 200/. damages, and the costs had been taxed at 212/. ss. Mr. Tuteel was not cross-examined. There was no other evidence offered. Mr. ROEBUCK rose to address the' Court. He said that was the debt on which his client came before the Court, in doing which he was not actuated by any spirit of revenge against the unfortunate insolvent, for unfortunate it un doubtedly was to be charged with the crime of which he was' found guilty ; nor was he influenced by any other feel ing save that of vindicating public justice, which had in his person been outraged. It was with pain he addressed the Court in this case. The insolvent had been brought up as a gentleman, had mixed frOm his station with gentlemen, and he presumed still possessed the feelings of a geFtlemaii. He was a member of the Church of England —was a mi nister of the Gospel. The party aggrieved was also a minister of the Gospel, and had been his intimate friend ; he had stood in the situation of his rector. Mr. COOKE interposed. He said there was no proof of the situation in which the parties had stood. Mr. Commissioner HARRIS observed that, by the record, they appeared as " clerks." Mr. ROEBUCK proceeded. They were both .Ministers of the Gospel, and the insolvent being a Minister had been convicted of criminal conversation with the wife of another Minister of the Gospel. The Court would perceive by looking to the schedule that he had stated he was not guilty, and ho was prepared to swear to that statement. He (Mr. Roebuck) came forward on the part of his injured client to have that statement expunged. The Court would look to the damages ; would look to the situation - of the insolvent ; the high station he had held ; the amount of damages sustained ; they were of that amount that he had been compelled to present his insolvency ; he was a poor man, and had proved it by his appearance in this Court. Though apparently the sum was small, yet the Jury in awarding 200/. were right in considering the insolvent a poor man. They considered him to be so, and the Court would, in apportioning the measure of punishment, appor tion the very highest degree to which they could, under the particular section of the Act, be enabled to go. He (Mr. Roebuck) would be performing an unworthy office if he were to run over the schedule to show the incapacity of the insolvent to pay the sum given by the Jury. So great had been the opinion of the Jury of his guilt that they had awarded an amount of damages which compelled him to come to this Court. Whom were the damages against ? A Minister of the Gospel, whose duty it was to teach the people their eternal welfare. He had been proved guilty of a crime, and yet had the unparalleled effrontery to insert in his schedule, to which he was to swear, a statement solemnly asseverating his innocence. Was that not an aggravation of the offenc e he had committed ? Was not the law open to him, to have taken another course to establish his innocence? Could he not . have again appealed to the law ? But he had not done so, and his client had no course left but to come before this Court, and ask for punishment in the name of public justice. . - Mr. COOKE was heard in reply. Wh a t was t hi s case ? Was it not, after all, a question of pound s , shillin gs , an d pence ? And:so it must remain. However unpoeti c al the reflection was, and derogatory to eloquence, the Court had but one course to pursue ; the amount of damages only could be proved, and the duty of the Court was to pro portion the extent of demand for that amount. His client was prepared solemnly before God to declare that he was an innocent man. He was innocent. He had assured him in private he would declare his innocence on his death bed of the charge of which he was accused, and he now stood before men, in the presence of his God, to assert solemnly his innocence. The laws of evidence, by which the Courts of justice in this country were governed, were no doubt framed on the wisest principles of human judg ment. Those laws might, however, in some cases l ea d to results completely at v ar i anc e to the principles b y which they were in general governed . There were, h e was sorry to say, feelings abroad hostile to his client. Th e press of the country had tried to turn aside the co urse of justice with regard to him. Was it not, then, impor tant that he should assert his innocence, and vindicate him self from the vengeance of a disappointed woman ?—for that really was the case. Such was the case, but still they must come back to pounds, shillings, and pence, for by no other consideration co uld the Court adjudge this cart,. The damages had been laid at 5,000/., and only 200/. given: was that not a circumstance for the consideration o f the Court ? There was no evidence of separation ; at all events the woman was not living with the insolvent ; that was not pretended. He had suffered much from his situa tion ;he must doubtless suffer more. It was for the Court to say what imprisonment, or whether any, he was to suffer. He had been some time in prison. To some a week was POLICE INTELLIGENCE. The cases at the various Police-offices yesterday possessed no interest. At Lambeth-street Mary Williams, an ac count of whom appeared in The Sun of Tuesday week, and for whom much sympathy had been excited, was proved to be a complete imposter, and sentenced to two months' imprisonment and hard labour in the House of Correction for obtaining charity under false and fraudulent pretences. EXTRAORDINARY TALE. BRIGHTON POLICE.—A little girl, who stated her name to be Charlotte Savage, - and that she was 13 years of age, was brought up by Mr. Solomon, who stated that her story was so extraordinary that he thought it his duty to let her state it to the Bench. The child, then, in reply to the questions of the Magis trate, stated that her father's name was Robert Savage, that he was formerly a soldier, but on marrying her mother, turned custom-houso officer, and was now living at Bristol. Just before haymaking time last year, she and her brother went to the theatre at Bath, and as they were returning home at night, her brother being a little on before, she was taken up by some gipseys, who gagged her and put her into a cart. She had ever since been travelling about with them, and knew the names of three, who were called John, Richard, and William Lee. They got a living by selling combs, and by stealing geese, turkeys, sheep, and rabbits, which they killed and skinned, and the skins of the sheep and rabbits they sold. When ever they travelled through any towns, they put her at the top of a cart, and when they encamped, she was al ways employed in washing linen or nursing the children ; and she could not escape, there being always a great boy and girl with her. About three weeks ago they went through Brighton to Lewes. There, part of the gipseys took lOdgings ; and these she was with having to go into the town left her meanwhile in a lodging - house kept by a Mrs. Tickner. There, to amuse herself, she began reed it).- the Testament with a little boy, which, Mrs. Tickner observing,' said she • could not have been brought up to the gipsey life, or she would not have been able to read. She replied she had not, and than told Mrs. Tickner her story. Mrs. Tickner said she had once had a little boy of her own stolen, and she knew what diAraction the loss .of children caused parents to feel ; and therefore the gipseys should give her up, or she would make them, and she would keep her till she heard from her parents. She then got a letter written to them and received an answer, stating that her mother was on her deathbed, and had been ill ever since her disappearance, together with .ss. in a parcel. Mrs. Tickner then hearing there was a steam packet that sailed from the chain pier to Bristol let her come over to Brighton. She accordingly arrived there yesterday, and went to the pier to inquire about the packet, and was told that there was no steam packet that went from Brighton to Bristol, but that there was a coach that did. She then went to all the coach offices, and there learned that the Bristol coach had ceased running for the last fortnight, and upon asking for lodgings was recommended to the Seven Stars. There she found a person who knew the place near to the Bell where she was taken up, and another who knew her mother and uncles. To them she showed the letter, which she has since lost ; and upon her making her story known she was brought to - the Town Hall, and put into the pri son. At the idea of being put into prison the child cried very much. Sir D. SCOTT asked what had become of the gipseys? The girl replied she did not know, as they were travelling about the country. Mr. Solomon said he had taken the girl to Mr. Thorn crOft, the assistant overseer, who took down the particulars in writing, but said he did not believe her story. The girl said if they would take her to Mr. Burton, of the theatre, he would know her again. Sir D. SCOTT—How do you know he is here ? Girl— I read his name in the play-bill, and he used to write letters to my mother when his wife lodged with us. He was pro perty man at our theatre. Sir D. SCOTT—Property man ! Why, how came you to know there was such a person in a theatre ? How came you to know so much about a theatre ? The girl replied her father and mother at one time lived in front of the Bath Theatre. They used to go to the theatre sometimes by permission of Mrs. Macready ; and she herself had been brought up to it, when a little girl three years old. They lived in the drawing-room, and had the whole of the house. Sir D. SCOTT—If we let you go now, you will never get home with 55., and then, if we did, you are likely to be taken by some gipseys again. Girl—l should like to be sent to Mr. Burton first, to see if he would send me home ; he knows all my relations, and I know him very well. Mr. Burton having been sent for said he thought he could remember her face, but it was two years since he had seen her. He added that he had no doubt of the truth of her story. ' The girl then asked him if he would let her have money to take her home, or if he would keep her until her friends should send for her ? This Mr. Burton said he could not afford to do. Mr. Solomons said the girl had told him the gipseys had a young man with them chained down to one of their carts. Sir D. SCOTT—Chained down ! The girl assured him that was the fact ; and from what she had heard from Mrs. Tickner, and the description given of him, she had no doubt it was a son of the Rev. Mr. Jones. Sir D. SCOTT then ordered Wise to take the girl over to Lewes and confront her with Mrs. Tickner ; and, if what the girl stated turned out to be true, directed a letter to be sent to the parents ; the girl meanwhile being kept in the workhouse. A singular case of mania has occurred in Aber deen. Jane Graham, a sober, honest old woman, literally died from want rather than accept of alms. Jane had seen better days—those who knew her family say that, fifty years ago, they were " weel upon 't," and the family pride of Jane had outlived family means, and hence the melan choly result, " She never told her want ;" for when we are informed, as is usual in some cases, a little of the left wine at the sacrament would have been offered her, she replied, " Eh, na, na, keep it, and gie't to yere poor things—fat wit ye dee . gien't to the like d' me ?" And to applications to speak for her to the Ladies' Clothing Society she would have said, " They hae aneuch adee wi' their poor to look to me !" Jane's necessitous circum stances were thus unknown to her nearest friends ; and when at last a woman who lived with her became aware of the circumstance, and communicated it to the neighbours, she was so completely exhausted, not having tasted a mor sel of food for several days, that wine and other restora tives bad no effect, and she died a short time after.—Cale donian Mercury. SMALL-PDX.—The cruel enemy to personal beauty, and to life itself, has lately been making great ravages amongst the infantine population in the east of London, 'great numbers of whom have fallen victims to the virulence of the disease. Several adult persons have also been at tacked by it, and some even of these have died. In one family, of the name of Collins, in the parish of Mile-end Old Town, seven persons took the disease, and from them it has spread to the houses of several of their friends and acquaintances. Two of their children were buried on Sunday week, and a young woman, who followed as mourner, and the undertaker who conveyed the corpse to the grave, have been attacked by the disorder in its most virulent form, and now lie in a most dangerous state. From the Bills of Mortality it appears that 836 children died of the small-pox within the last year in London alone. It is to be regretted that the practice of vaccination is not uni versally adopted, and that where it is, many parents neglect to see that the vaccine virus has taken effect. It ought to be generally known that unless the presence of the cow pock is distinctly marked by the rising of pustules no safety can be expected from the attacks of the small-pox. LIVERPOOL COTTON-MARKET, WEDNESDAY.-- We have experienced a very great demand for cotton to-day, chiefly for consumers, and considerable business has been done—say to the extent of 6,000 bales, at full market prices for all kinds. We hear of 700 Cearas and Pernams, from 10id. to 120. ; 700 Maranhams, from 11d. to 12d. ; 400 Bahias, from 91d. to 10d. ; 200 Laguayras, from 91d. to Sid. ; 50 Egyptians, 12id. ; 300 Surats, 61d. to 7d. ; re mainder American, from lid. to 101 d., and Will. for Orleans. CAPTAIN GLASCOCK'S " NAVAL SERVICE."-- The naval circles, from the fresh caught middy to the wea ther-beaten and stern old admiral, will peruse with plea sure this valuable work, by Captain Glascook. There is no subject connected with the service on which it does not fully and most lucidly comment. It must become a vade mecum with all grades of officers. The gallant author is well qualified for the task he has undertaken, as the pen is as familiar to his hand as the tiller, the sextant, and the sword. THE SCHOOLMASTER ABROAD. TIMOTHY MADDEN V. JOHN IVORY. The plaintiff, a sombre-looking youth, whose optics were nearly concealed from view by a pair of dark heavy eye brows, stepped forward to the witness's table, at the Dun garvan Petty Sessions, and being sworn, said—Please your Worships, it may not be cognisable to you, that I, Timothy, or Timotheus, vulgarly called in the Irish idiom, Theague Madden, now located within a short distance of Dungarvan, but erstwhiles a disciple of the school called peripatetics ; am an in cu l ca t or t o th e j uven il e m ind, and, as it will appear before you by the example I am going to adduce, to the senile mind too—(A laugh)—l Am of that profession in which Socrates delighted, and Diogenes found a charm. The Bench—Proceed, Mr. Madden, but not in such a strain of learned eloquence. Mr. Madden—l was recapitulating the exquisiteness of refinement called for, or demanded in a gentleman whose profession it is " to teach the young idea how to shoot," or minister to a mind diseased ;" but I fear I cannot pro ceed, as this gentleman, Mr. Ivory, your Worships, threatens me, vi et armis.—(Laughter.) Well, Sirs, Mr. Ivory keeping the school, soon discovered that he was not factus ad unguem—in more explicably language to ears unlearned—that he was unacquainted with the cola neces saria—id est, with the necessary qualifications.—(Laughter.) Mr. Ivory—Oh ! the liard.—(Roars of laughter.) Mr. Madden—" To rear the tender thought," or supply pabula to the mens divinior of his disciples. He having been told by Fame of the humble individual who now standeth before your high tribunal, begging justice as a suitor in lowly guise, and expecting it at your hands—he hired me—or rather entered upon an enmement with me, to inculcate the rudiments of science and language to him self and scholars. Bench—What have you to say, Mr. Ivory ? Mr. Ivory, a hard-featured gentleman, bearing all the outward marks of the country schoolmaster, self-important,, domineering and irascible, with folded arms and stern brow, said—You have heard a good dale of raumash from this gor soon, who I can tell your honours he is nothing more nor less than a Hard. I don't deny that I hired him to teach. I hired him to teach both myself and my scholars—he was to perfecta me in Algebra and English Grammar, for the, sum of 1/,—(Loud laughter.) He did not perfect me in those branches, and I therefore refused more than I thought I was his due. Mr. Madden—Your Worships, he desires to baffle my just claim by a plea of impossibility—it is as clear as Eu clid's fifth proposition—vulgo ditto—the "pons asinorum— that Mr. Ivory's brain, though it may be as white, is yet as hard as the name in quo gaudet, that is, Sirs, in which he rejoices ;heis de facto—et quod denominatum est in omne caso, 1 beg your honours' pardon, we sometimes ruminate in the lingua latina—(Laughter)--but he is what he has proven to be--a numbscull—and the Greek calends may appear, before I would be nble to administer a knowledge of cramp Algebra to his darkened pate.—( Loud laughter.) Mr. Ivory, during this exposition, was chafing with mad ness, and at length gave vent to his indignation by calling his professor " a Bard." The defendant was obliged to pay the demand, and the costs of the prosecution, greatly to his chagrin. HORRIBLE AND ATROCIOUS BARBARITY. A MAN BURIED ALIVE !—The Clare Journal gives the following, being the result of the Coroner's Inquest in this appalling transaction—the first notice of which ap peared in the Mail of Monday, under the head of " Mys terious Occurrence," -copied from the Limerick Star : " An inquisition was taken before Thomas Whitestone, Esq., Coroner, and a Jury of very respectable gentlemen, at Broadford, on New. Year's Day, on view of the ske leton of a man named Patrick Barry, who was buried alive about thirteen months since. The circumstances attending this appalling transaction are nearly as follow, and which have been given in evidence by one of the persons who as sisted at the time. The deceased had been a millwright, for some time in the employment of a man of the name of David Burns, near Broadford ; he was old and in a very delicate state of health, and being no longer able to work at his trade, Burns sent him on a car to some friends of his residing in the county of Tipperary, with one of his sons and the informer, who had also been in his service. On their arriving there they were 'refused admittance at two houses, and were obliged to return back. On their re turning they communicated the circumstance to old Burns, who asked them why they did not put him into a hole, and throw a ditch on him, and immediately ordered ano th er o f his sons to go and make a grave in a small burial-place, convenient to the house, which he did ; and then the younger son and the informer brought him there, having previously taken off part of his clothes : they then thrust him into the hole, and when covering him with earth, it is alleged he groaned twice, and stirred one of his arms, upon observing which, the informer called and said they would all be hanged, for the man was alive. This, however, did not prevent them from pursuing their inhuman work, and the unfortunate man was covered in. Previous to the disco very of the body, which had on it at the time some portion of decayed articles of clothing, the informer described the place where it was interred, and most accurately the posi tion in which the body was found ; the head raised, th e body inclining to the right side, and one leg also raised, a s if indicating an effort to rescue himself, or of great suffering when they were throwing the earth upon him. It is a re markable circumstance, that over the body a child's coffin was found, of which the informer denies all knowledge. The Jury came to the following decision, ' that the de ceased was buried alive, by James Burns, Michael Burns, and John Connellan, and with the concurrence and know ledge of David Burns, the father,' all of whom have been committed." MEMOIRS OF MATTHIAS D'AMOUR On the occasion alluded to (a dinner at the Duchess of Gordon's), I remember, just as the Prince of Wales had been giving way to his peculiar happy style of jocularity, the Duchess remarked that, whoever should live to see it, his Royal Highness would make a singular king. Gathering up his face into the very picture of seriousness, he replied, " Pardon me, your Grace ; I think the honour of England has been so degraded of late, that the crown would scarcely be worth the wearing." The Prince alluded to the peace which England had been forced into with America and its allies ; and the Duchess, remembering who sat at her right hand (the Duke of Orleans), without a moment's hesitation rejoined, " And Sir, pardon 'me, in return ; I think Eng land, having had the magnanimity to defend herself against four such powerful and persevering assailants, and having had the means of making such an honourable peace, be tokens that the honour of Great Britain was never more free from tarnish than at this moment." A murmur of ap plause went through the company, in which the Duke of Orleans joined as well as the rest. I remember on one occasion, when we were expecting the Prime Minister and his colleagues to supper, that her Grace beginning to feel impatient, as it grew late, requested me to send to the House of Commons, and try to ascertain by some means if the house was likely to break up soon. The messenger brought word that Mr. Dundas was upon his legs, but nothing further could be learned. When they came, the Duchess; in expressing h er apprehension that the supper was spoiled, asked Mr. Dundas what in the name of wonder induced him to make a speech that night, adding that she had sent her compliments to Mr. Fox, re questing him as a favour not to make a long speech. Mr. Pitt laughed heartily, and remarked with singular liberality, " Mr. Fox has not obeyed your Grace ; he has made a long speech, and decidedly. the best which I have heard within the walls of Parliament." During the afternoon (of the day in which the duel be tween the Duke of York and Colonel Lennox took place) we had a visit from her Royal Highness the Duchess of Cumberland, which caused me to be witness of a circum stance which was never made public, and which throws some light upon the views which even ladies in high life take of points of honour. Her Royal Highness alighting from her carriage, and entering the house in a hurry, and presenting herself at the door of the Duchess's room, scarcely gave me time to announce her, and by no means gave me time to retire, ere she exclaimed with the greatest apparent glee, " Thank God, your Grace, it is now established that princes can be called to account as well as other gentlemen." The Duke of Bedford, it is well known, had been, as his nephew is at present, one of the most influential leaders of the Whig party. His Grace had been disgusted at the line of policy pursued by the men in power, and, hai'ing retired in a great measure from public life, was employing himself in im proving the breeds of sheep and horned cattle in the country. While the Duke was in this humour, I heard our Duchess one day, while dining with his Grace at Woburn Abbey, re monstrate with him, and e ven blame liirn that he did no t Join in with and endeavour to guide the young and gifted Mr. Pitt. The Duke's answer was rather uncandid. " If," said he, "your Grace can point me out one good thing which Mr. Pitt has done for the nation, I will consent." CREDITORS ON TURNPIKE -ROADS, NOT IN JURED BY RAILWAYS.—When the Liverpool Railway was opened the creditors of the present turnpike-road became alarmed for their money, which they had called in. The Treasurer could not pay then—he had no funds for the road was indebted to him. But mark the consequence— within five years after the opening of the Liverpool Rail way, the Treasurer's debt of 2,4001. has been paid off, be sides 3,000/. of bond debt. Such is the flourishing state of the funds of the road, that the trustees intend to pay off 1,000/. of their debt. per annum. This is owing to the in crease of traffic on the road consequent on the Railway. The creditors on the Durham and Tyne turnpike need be under no alarm with this fact before them.—Tyne Mercury. SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. ADVICES, ARRIVALS, AND DEPARTURES AT THE SCOTCH WHARFS, JAN. 14. HORE'i DUNDEE AND PERTH STEAM WHARF..—Advice the Dundee, Perth, and London Shipping Company's steam ship Dundee, John Wishart commander, sailed from Dundee 13th inst. for this wharf. Hoftit's WHARF.-Adviees : the Dundee, Perth, and London Shipping Company's smack Glasgow, John Caithness master, arrived at Dundee 10th inst. ; on which day the same Com pany's smack London, John Martin master, sailed from Dundee, for this wharf. Arrival : the Kirkaldy and London Shipping' Company's smack Vi t riterprise, James Mann master, from Kirkaldy, with a general cargo. No departures. DowNE's NINARF.—No advices. Arrival; the Bridport Shipping Company's vessel London, John Swain master, from Bridport, with a general cargo. No departures. CARRON WHARF.—Advice : the Carron Shipping Com pany's smack Dyname, Robert Walker master, sailed from Carron 12th inst., for this wharf. No arrivals. DepartUres: the Carron Shipping Company's brig Juno, Thomas M'Alley master, for Grangemouth ; and the Axmouth Shipping Com pany's packet Totness, Henry Ballet master, for Axmouth, both with general cargoes. LEITH AND GLASGOW WHARF. —NO advices Or . arrivals. Departure : the Leith and Gla sgow Shipping Company'i vessel Hawk, Adam Currie master, for Leith, with a gerieral cargo. LEITH AND GLASGOW WHARF.—Advice : the schooner Veitch, David Munro master, arrived at Leith 9th ins-. VESSELS ENTERED INWARDS AT THIS CUS TOM-HOUSE, JAN. 14. The Earl of Liverpool, Lomax, from Ostend; Roseau, Park, Galate and Ibrail; Ann and Elizabeth, Pain, Abber ville; Swallow, Dady, Guernsey; Lynx; Anning, ditto; Dantzic Packet, Tanner, Dantzic ; Napoleon, Joyce, Havan nah ; Violet, Childs, Gijon. ENTERED OUTWARDS FOR LOADING, JAN. 14. The City of Exeter, Robertson, for Rotterdam; Britannia, Stranack, ditto ; Alegria do Porto, Lopes, Oporto; Charles, Hayes, Nantes; Magic, Travers, Corfu and Zante; Princess Victoria, Lee, Linton and Calcutta; Tourist, Crow, Hani burgh ; Joven Henrique, De Goyarrolo, Bilboa; Lord Rus sell, List, Gibraltar; Jean, Dare, St. Vincent's; Jemima, Johns, Lisbon. CLEARED OUTWARDS WITH CARGO, JAM. 14. The Bien Aurigo, De Euchave, for Cadiz ; Cuba, Wylie, St. Lucia; Osbert, Dalrymple, Dominica; Claudine, Heat born, Madras; James Watt, Jamieson, Corunna. CLEARED OUTWARDS IN BALLAST, JAN. 14- The Thomas Harrison, Harrison, Sydney. VESSELS SPOKEN WITH. The Laurel, Paul, Clyde to Demerara, .on the 22d.u1t., lat. 49., long. 18. The Robert Kerr, Liverpool to Mobile, on the 2tith ult., lat. 38., long. 26. The Mary, Liverpool for Antigua, the 27th. The Mount Stuart Elphinstone, Clyde for Bay, on the 28th, lat. 48., long. 34. The Eliza Killick, St. Domingo and Cork to Leghorn, on the 31st, lat. 46., long. 19., by the Imogene, arrived at Liverpool. • The Lady of the Isles,. Gibson, Scilly for Terceira, lat. 49., long,. 11., by the Olive-branch, arrived at Penzance. The Clara, of Bridgewater, supposed the Clara, Miles, with loss of rudder and fore-course, under close-reefed maintop sail, ensign union down in the shrouds, on the 14th u lt., l at . 47., long. 43., by th e C ane Grove, Armstrong, arrived at Penzance, which vessel kept by her till dark, when they sepa rated in a very heavy gale. The La Grange, lat. 49. 30., long. 6. 50., by the Edward Robinson, arrived at Cowes. The Vine, Miles, Bristol to London, on the 10th inst., off the Lordships, with stern damaged and loss of boats. The Urania, Smith, London to Jamaica, lat. 87., long. ft., by the Venus, Carthen, arrived at Dublin. ARRIVED AT LIVERPOOL, JAN. 13. The Michigan, Badger, from New Orleans; Nimrod, Atkins, Charleston ; Temperance, Simon, Cape of Good Hope ; Sarah, Grundy, Amsterdam ; St. Andrew, Garrison, St. John's, New Brunswick ; Richard Batley, Scott, Sicily; Ellen Clare, Messina. ENTERED FOR LOADING, JAN: 13, The John Begg, Turner, for Africa; Jetsie Ritchie, M'Lachlan, Hayti ; Nero, Jarvas, Lisbon ; Liki, M'Donald, Port-au-Prince; San*Jose, Jade Vittardanda, Cadiz. CLEARED OUTWARDS, JAN., 13. The Dalmatia, Childs, for Boston; Stratl•,ista, Johnstone, Hobart Town; Constant, Antwerp ; Tropic, Pratt, New York ; Lyndar, Kerswell, Cape of Good Hope ; Apollo, Ross, Lisbon; Florent, Paalsen, Antwerp. TELEGRAPHED. Off port, the St. Andrew, Nelson Wood, and the Beverley, from St. John's, New Brunswick. Wind, W. THE EMPEROR NAPOLEON.'—The first nine parts the Emperor Napoleon," publishing in weekly shilling num " Memoirs of of the new edition of the Count Las cases' hers, beautifully embellished with portraits; ri,ce,aes, &c., are now before the public. We understand thrit . the work will be completed in 20 parts, and will thus cost but one-eighth of its original price. In his preface, thfa Cc , unt observes that " circumstances the most extraortlinar y have long, kept me near the most remarkable Man that ever existed% . The world is full of his glory, his deeds, and has monuments, but no one knows the true shades of his chmmeter, his p 4 te vate qualities, or the natural disposition of his soul. This great void I undertake to fill up ; and, for such a task, I possess advantages unexampled in history. I. collected and recorded, day by day, all that I saw of Nap oleon, and all that I heard him say, during the whole period in which I was constantly about his person." This vvo:rk may, there fore, be justly considered as the autobiography *of N a p o l eon . MELCHIOR THE GIP SEY .—Thi s ch an tcter, which Marryat has introduced i n hi s new novel, " Japhet in Search of a Father," is well sustained, and depicted in the author's best manner. Japhet's adventures abound in inci dent, strange but not unnatural, and they are recommended in every part by a quiet and rich 'sense of thee hamourous. Familiar verisimilitude is the essential chars eteristic of all that Captain Marryat writes. There is m ) stiffness, nor straining, nor affectation, nor pedantry in his narratives, but he gives them forth with all .the ease of an. eloquent and veteran ruler of the wine and walnuts ; o'er readers will thank us for recommending to their notice this amusing , production. BITHS. On the 12th i nst., at Lancaste R r, the lady of E. G. Hemby, Esq., of a dau g ht er . On the 13th inst., at the residence of her father in Park crescent, the lady of S. B. Worms, Esq., of a daughter. On the 14th inst., in Mecklenburg-square, Mrs. Henr y Weston, of a daughter. On Wednesday, in Golden-square, Mrs. William IL Summers, of a son. On the 13th inst., at Salisbury, the lady of Ambros. a Hussey, Esq., of a son. On Wednesday, at Dalham Hill, the lady of Thomas l3s Hoc kin, Esq., New Inn, of a son. On the 10th inst., at Groveland Villa, Mount Radford. :Park, the lady of George Watts, Esq., of a son. At Brooklands Park, Southampton, the lady of Lieut. -Colonel O'Meara, of a son. MARRIED. On the 11th inst., at St. Mary's Church, Weymouth,, Theophi- Ins John St. George, Esq., eldest son of Sir Richard . Bligh St. George, hart., of Woodsgift, county of Kilkenny, to Car &fine Geor giana, second (laughter of Joseph Lautour, Esq., of He: cton House, Herefordshire. On the 13th inst, at Layton Church, John Mast arman, jun., Esq ,of Nicholas-lane, to Emily Lucy, third daughter .of William Rhodes, Esq., of the Grange, Layton, Essex. On the 14th inst., at St. Luke's, Middlesex, Mr. Wi t g, Blakes ley, of Milton-street, Dorset-square, to Caroline, eldest daughter of C. Earith, Esq., of Goswell-street. On the 11th inst., at St. Luke's, John Edwards, 'Esq.., of Llan elly, to Eliza Sophia, only daughter of the late Peter Dlom, Esq., of Windsor -terrace. On the 4th i ns t., a t G reat Bedwin,,Wilts Mr. H. P. Major, surgeon, Hunge r fO r d, B er k s , to Miss Maria ' Pike, of the former place, daughter of the late Mr. W. Pike. DIED. At Chelsea, aged 82, Colonel Robert Hall, formerly o Topsham, Devon. He served at Gibraltar during the whole of 1 memor able siege, and is outlived by no more than seven Officei !s of all who were then garrisoned there. On Monday last, the 11th inst., at Leicester, on the dose of his 80th year, John Moore, Esq., of that place, deeply la me nted and deservedly respected. On Tuesday, the sth inst., at her residence in. the Pallant, Chichester, Mrs. Elizabeth Weller, aged 90 years, sister of the late John Weller, Esq. On the 14th inst., in Portland-place, at the residence. of Dowager Lady Cooper, Sir William Henry Cooper, Bart. , Chilton Lodge, Berkshire. On the 14th inst., at Vine Cottage, Sandy End, Fulham, John Robert Pearce ; Esq., aged 40. On the 23d of November, in William Henry, Low er Canada, Joseph Ti m p eron , j un ., E sq ., eldest son o f J. fimperon, Esq., of New Barnes, near St. Alban's. On the 13th inst., at Nottingham-place, St. Maryleb. one, Henry Esq., second son of the late James Hunt H olley, Esq., o H f u ß n u t ic H kl o in ll g ey , Bucks, Dorothy Broor ' On the 4th 'N i o n r s i t o . l , k ;t a ii Marlon, fling relict of T. Headlam, Esq., of Aigburth,. Liverpool. ( 4 place,Crescent- Burton-crescent. O Saturday last, in Mid:legate, aged 83, George 1 'eacock, Esq., On the 13th inst., Sarah, the wife of Mr. Reid, of Lord Mayor of that city. for 28 years an Alderman of York, and having twice s , .trved the office leavi Onng th a widow and infant son.e 1 lth inst., at Brussels, Charl es C ockay ne !Frith, Esq., GI a On the llth inst., aged 84, Willi am Jernegan , tsq., of Swansea, morganshire. burn, At St. Peter's, in the Isle o f T hanet, aged 66, H. B. Black- On the 12th inst., aged 65, Hannah, White of Mr. John Laroch, Clarendon-square, New -road. gate O -street n the 14th inst., at S t. Alban's, John Reid, Esq., or Ald ers - On the 11th inst., aged 74, Mrs. Caroline Webster, or .Reigatc, Surrey. On the 11th inst., at 77, Seymour-place, Bryanstono -square, Margaret, relict of Arthur Webber, Esq., R.N. Yesterday, aged 48, Mr. Charles Smith, of the Illae.k Bull, Whitechapel-road. On the 14th inst., at Old Bromptem, aged 69, Mr. T. Strong. .ondon : Printed and Published by MURDO YO7 jNG, o. 112, Strand, at The S t e: OffleeNi4o. 112, Strand in th of Ne county of Middl esex. , At t 14, flay s Gr e; New At tl Lot doors Lack to Ai 1%10 1 :( Patio T, 4ar s Fort 14, Al adelt i h ; jUdg 41trii tong q au And , it„, I{ elu el „ 110; co ns AT„ leas. and - -rrt a ; Gl,, stark 410 i,