The Sun. — London, England, 1821-07-02 00:00:00

PARLIAM E NT, EOCf,SE OF COAEVIONS, JUNE 30. The SPEAKER took the Chair at four o'clock ; the House was rather thinly attended. The Acetous Acid, and Draining Tiles Bill, the Hops Exportation Drawback Bill, the Isle of liaa Trade Bill, the Stock Cancelling Bill, and the Silk Bounties (Ireland) Bill, were severally read a third time, and passed. The. Exchequer Bills Public Works Bill was coonnitted.—Report on Monday. DUKE or CLARENCE AND THE CORONATION. un bringing up the Report of the Duke of Clarence's Alinuityißill, Sir RONALD FEtt - S.SON rose and said, he would give his decided negative to that part of the Bill which granted to the Royal Duke 18,0001. arrears. I t was contrary to every prin ciple of propriety, as it affected Parliament, and 'Of justice towards. the people, and he would op poe.such's.-yote to the last with determined hos tility: Ile ' then said, " while. upon my legs, I wish to ask the Noble Lord in the blue ribband (Londonderry . J as a day is fixed for the Corona tion, whether it is intended that her Majesty shall be crowned or not ? " The Marquess of "LONDONDERRY—" I can only inform the Hon. Member that her Majesty has claimed a right of being crowned, and has made - application to that effect. As to my own opinion, it always was, that the Queen Consort has no such right, and that it is not the privilege of her station, but as,a.matter of favour, emanat ing from the regal discretion of the Crown, and certainly, in that point of view, the advice of Ministers would not be that her Majesty should • participate in the ceremony." Sir R. FERCi-60N—" I ask the Noble Lord when that application of right was made ?" The Marquess of LONDONDERRY---" A few days ago." ' - Sir R. FERGUSSON—" Can the Noble Lord in forin me whether her Majesty's Counsel, or the legal - advisers of the Crown have been consulted on the occasion ?" The Marquess of LONDONDERRY.---" I do not apprehend that I sit here to answer every ques tion which any Honourable Member pleases to put to me."—(Hear, hear, on the Ministerial benches!) •Mr. DENNLIN—" I apprehend the Noble Lord sits here as a Member of Parliament, though else where he may be a Privy Councillor, and, in m 7 opinion, he is bound to give an answer touching matters of State, at least those affecting the regal power, like the present one. I can, however, inform the Hon. Member who has put the ques tion and the House, that to the application from her Majesty on Monday, the only answer receiv ed was, that the Law Officers of the Crown would be consulted; but I always regarded the omission of the Queen's name in the Liturgy as the virtual declaration of Ministers, that her Ma jesty was not to be crowned, and I am surprised that the same persons who advised that measure, should now feel it necessary to consult any fur ther-on the subject.—(Hear, hear !)----instead of having a decided opinion, on which they ought to be prepared to act. The answer proves, that there is a degree of hesitation in coming to a de cision, and whether that hesitation arises from doubts entertained by the Law Officers or Minis ters themselves, it establishes in itself a claim on the part of her Majesty to be heard before the Privy Council, by the asserters of her legal rights. It is very strange, that from Monday to Saturday no definite answer has been returned. What can occasion this hesitation now,- if, when Minis ters advised that the Queen's name should be left out of the Liturgy, they were convinced of the just grounds and propriety of taking a step which might have the effect of excluding her from the Coronation ?—This delay, however, I repeat, is a sufficient cause why there should be no decision until her Majesty shall have been allowed an opportunity of supporting her claim before that tribunal where she prays to he heard —a tribunal, which, however, she cannot ap proach with the same confidence as she would have done had it not prejudged her case on a for mer occasion. —(Hear !)" • 'rule Marquess of LONDONDERRY---" I am sur prised that the lion. and Learned Gentleman . should assume that I had ever given any opinion as to the claim of right, when distinctly stated, that I gave no opinion as to the legal claim ; I stated also, that as an application had been made advancing a legal right, that claim should undergo a legal investigation ; but I repeat, that I gave no opinion as to the result; what I did say was, that I understood. the privilege claimed to be a matter of discretion, inherent in the Crown, and as a matter of regal discretion, the Crown could not be advised that her Majesty should participate ; and now, allow me to say, it appears very singular that the legal advisers of her Majesty should not have presented this claim sooner; the point had been mooted in Parlia ment-two months ago, when I stated what I have just explained, as- to the advice respecting the refusal of the claim as a matter of discretion.— Did her Majesty's legal advisers then not know how to act ? or -why have they stood still and de clined advancing this claim until the very eve of the Coronation,—(hear)—at which moment they start a claim of right which they never mentioned before Was it because they saw a disposition manifested on the other side of the House to complain of the Coronation, . and to t rea t w ith disrespect every thing belonging to it, that they now set up this right for the first time ?—(dear.) • —lf they knew of this legal right, why not urge it before ? or was it only a pretext for bringing the-Coronatioe into hatred and contempt?"— (Hear, hear!) Mr. DENMAN—" So far am I from feeling any reproach' from what has fallen from the Noble Lord, that it appea rs t o me h er Majesty's" legal advisers would have act e d i mproperly, had they brought the claim forward until,. from all appear ances, it was quite certain that the Coronation was to take place; fallow the delay has been cone siderable, but was not. the Coronation talked of last year, and yet did not occur ? Preparations were then making ; which it was doubtful whe- Cher they were to serve for the honour of the King or the degradation of his Royal Wife.---- (Hear, hear !)—Such preparations, therefore, gave no assurance that the Coronation was ever to take place. The Noble Lord may differ from me, but I feel that we were not bound to advise this step until her Majesty was satisfied that the Coronation would take place at no distant pe riod ; but I do conceive that we have some right to complain of this delay on the part of the Noble Lord and his colleagues, in not having given a definitive answer to her Majesty's application, as their minds ought to have been made up be fore now, and therefore the charge of unneces sary delay was upon them, and not on her Ma jesty's legal advisers. They should have been able to give an opinion at once, as to what part her Majesty was to act, and it ought not to be now a matter of deliberation whether she was to participate or not in that ceremony, according to the right which she derived from the custom of the country, and which had been recognized by Act of Parliament. The ceremony is in itself a pageant, but the ancient custom of the country made it solemn, and granted to the Queen Con sort a participation in the rites belonging to the accession to the Throne. I cannot therefore see why Ministers should not have been prepared with a speedy and decisive answer as soon as the claim was made, and I contend that the delay itself is proof enough that her Majesty's legal defenders ought to be beard before the Council, previous to any decision now taking place, which might have the effect of excluding her." The Mar q uess of LONDO NDERRY —" An-an swer was given long ago to the - claim as a matter of discretion. It Alas not then brought forward in a legal shape, but now as a claim of right has been set up, it must go through the ordinary course of legal investigation.—(Hear.)—I cannot avoid observing, that while the Hon. and Learned Gentleman insists so much upon facility in giving answers in the Ministers of the Crown, I see no thing of that facility in his own conduct, nor can I tell why his vigilance has slept so long, as to al-low an interval of many days between the official notification of the Coronation, and the setting up of this claim of right. Otherapplications had been made of a different nature, and there really does appear to me to be something of mys tery, if not of intention, in delaying to bring for ward this claim before."—(]rear.) Mr. SCARLETT—" The Noble Lord may be very correct in not admitting that he ever gave any opinion on the legal claim, but I don't think it quite fair in him to speculate as to the circum stances which may have occasioned that claim not to have been presented before ; I need not remind the House that the law's delay is prover bial. And in this case I do not see why It should be taken in a sense injurious to the legal Gen tlemen employed ; when her Majesty chooses to take any step of .this nature, she gives di rections to her Legal Advisers, and they are bound to give their counsel and assistance, but I apprehend they can originate no mea sure themselves. I understand some case has been laid before the Law Officers of the Crown,l and I wish to ask whether the Queen has ap-i plied to be heard before the Council ? I have not attended much to the subject of the legal claim, but I have heard it said that there were only two instances where the privilege was not enjoyed (a Member said " only one.") lam aware there is in reality but one instance, and it is a vulgar error to suppose that the wife of Henry VII. was not crowned ; on account of the peculiar circumstances in which he was placed, that King hastened his own Coronation before the marriage, but, after - the marriage, his wife was crowned, In the case of Henrietta-Maria, she was a Catholic, and the original Proclamation, indeed, stated that she was to be crowned. Be fore the Coronation, however, a change took place, on account of the difficulties relative to the religious ceremony, as it was dangerous for the responsible advisers of the Crown to advise that the ceremony should be performed by Popish Priests, who just at that time were not in good odor. She was, however, present at the ceremo nies, though not crowned ; and that she was not was occasioned by the Parliament, and not by the will of the King.—(Hear, hear !)—lf this was the only case, I consider it a matter of grave consideration, how Tar it can bear on the present question, and whether the Coronation of the King ought to take place in such a way as to exclude the Queen Consort from a participation in the ceremony, which she claimed as a matter of custom and of law."—(Hear, hear!) The Marquess of LONDONDERRY—" r l ook upon this as too grave and important a ques tion for discussion in this incidental manner.— (Hear, hear !)—The subject is before the Privy Council, and I cannot give any explanation- of the proceedings there, without violating my duty as a Privy Councillor ; but I hope it will not be supposed, from any thing which I have said, that I declare there is any intention that her Majesty shall not be crowned."—(Hear, hear !) Mr. BERNAL then declared that he would take every opportunity of objecting to the Bill now before the House, nor did he think ,it improper that an Am en d men t s h ou ld be moved to the bringing up this Report, or see why it should not be done on Saturday. He entered his so- lemn protst against the granting of what was called the arrears, and would always give it his temperate but firm and decided opposition. One thing he just called to mind relative to this Bill, which was, that the Hon. Baronet, Member for Carlisle (Sir J. Graham), in alluding to the re jection of the grant three years ago, lately stated in the House that his Royal Highness was at that time willing to accept the grant of 6,0001. and that it was not on his own decision that he refused it. He remembered the Hon. Baronet said that he was prevailed upon, or rather insti gated (for he recollected the expression) by some, of his friends to refuse that grant. He (Mr. Bernal) had heard no explanation given by the Noble Lord on this subject, at which he could not help expressing his surprise; no man in or out of the House - courld . foot at this. Bill, and temperately consider :all the circumstances rela tive to it, without objecting to the grant. He could allow a great deal for personal feelings and personal attachment ) but he begged of Gen- tlemen who entertained such predilections, to re collect that it was not very liberal in them to pay off private debts of gratitude with the public mo ney, or to gratify their own feelings at the expellee of the'coun try and their constituents.—(hear!)-- He had no objection that they should express their attachment, by an act of liberality on their own part, but not at the expellee of others, "by voting away the money out of the pockets of the people. As to the grant of 6000/. itself, much stress was laid upon the willingness with which the House was ready td vote that sum formerly, but the. House might have been justified iu mak ing such a grant some years ago, and yet the cir cumstances of. the country might have so altered since, as to make it no longer proper for the House to do so.. He begged also to observe, that neither the Noble Lord opposite, nor the Gen tlemen around him, were justified in claiming any monopoly of attachment to the Royal Fa mily.—(Hear, hear!)—He (Mr. B.) and his friends entertained for them, as Englishmen, a constitutional reverence, and with that feeling they wished to see them on a proper and digni fied throne in the hearts of their subjects.— (Hear, hear!)—Nothing could so much tend to unseat them in the hearts of Englishmen as the constant discussions forced upon Parliament by the injudicious acts of the Noble Lord and his friends opposite, of which the most improper and injudicious was this grant of 18,0001. as arrears, in the present 'distressed state of the country. — lie really thought that there was a source of Royal Bounty"; wll!ch ought to be open to the Duke of Clarence, if be was fettered with debts, and it was much more becoming that the libera lity of the Crown should supply his wants, than that recourse should be had to this injudicious and unconstitutional mode.—(hear, hear!) . Mr. R. MARTIN defended the grant, on the ground that the younger branches of the family of the late good old King should have sufficient means to support their rank and dignity among the English Nobility. Mr. WATSON TAYLOR stated, in reference to what had fallen from an Hon. Member (Mr. Ber nal,) that his Royai Highness had not declined the grant of 60001. on account of the suggestion of Ministers, or of any individual connected with office. He had, in that instance, acted solely upon the advice and suggestion, of private and personal friends, who represented to him that if he accepted 60001. a-year, and resided in Eng land, after having stated a necessity for 10,0001. it would appear as if lie acknowledged the lesser sum was sufficient, and had made an over de mand on Parliament when he asked for the greater vote, and they thought it better that he should decline it altogether and reside upon the continent, as it was easier for him to do so with out that sum than, with it, to keep up his esta blishment in England. He followed their advice, but soon after returned, on account of public and domestic circumstances, which were too well known to require any further explanation. These facts he mentioned for the satisfaction of the Hon. Member, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the question.—(Hear, hear !) The Marquess of LONDONDERRY observed, that he knew nothing of what the Hon. Baronet alluded to. He was led to believe that the Duke of Clarence had declined the grant, be cause he was convinced that if he remained in England on the terms proposed, he must involve himself in debt, as the allowance was insufficient for the support of his dignity ; but circumstances had occurred to embarrass him as much as if he had resided in England, and he only asked to be placed in the situation in which he should have stood if he had continued to reside in. England. Mr. BERNAL said the Noble Lord had given him no answer as to what had fallen from the Hon. Member for Carlisle. He had asked the explanation because he understood the Noble Lord was in the House at the time. An Hon. MEMBER under the gallery observed, that tire vote was a matter of right and justice to the Duke of Clarence. Colonel DAN - lEs said, he had given his vote for the arrears, but riot as a matter of right; and he protested against such language. He had voted as he did, because he was anxious that his Royal Highness should be placed in the same si tuation as if he had originally accepted of the grant, as he did not think it right that having de clined it in a moment of hasty decision, it should be severely visited upon him.. But then the vote was still to be considered a matter of special fa vour (Hear, hear !)—to relieve his Royal high ness from the disgraceful circumstances of being overwhelmed with debt, and to place him in the same situation with the rest of the Royal Family. It was on this principle that he voted for the ar rears, and because they were asked as a favour to clear off debts incurred, and to uphold the cre dit and authority of the Royal Family. As to the Coronation, he declared he would- not vote a single farthing for defraying the expellees beyond the sum which had been already voted. The Marquess of LONDONDERRY stated, that his Royal highness had not applied to the house for this grant as a matter of right, but had asked it as a boon, and thanked them for their liber ality. Mr. SCAItLETT observed, that this grant was made without any special recommendation from the Crown, which was customary in such cases. Two Parliaments ago, or certainly in the Parlia ment before the last, a similar application was made to the House, but then it was accompanied by a recommendation from the Throne, and it is worthy of remarking, that it was in the late reign. The Noble Lord could set him right if he was mistaken. The Marquess . Of LONDONDERRY said the Ho nourable and Learned Member was not in his plaCe when the application was made, or he would have known that intimation was given that the Royal acknowledgments would be made in the proper stage of the Bill. In 1814, 50,0001. was voted to her present - Majesty, upon a similar re commendation. On that occasion it was notified to the House, that the Royal approbation - would be signified in the usual stage. Mr. SCARLETT . asked, was he to understand that theie was in that instance no Royal Message ? The MarqUess of LO,NDONDERRY repeated his former statement Mr. DENMAN 'aid his Honourable and Learn ed Friend had expressed the ''same doubt on this - subject as he had himself before expressed. Iftl< observations , of the Noble Lord on that, precedNa which lik,;ited was worth . -a n y 'thing-, it wctuat gb \ the'llt of Cabsirig theflit to dispense with a Royal Message in every case of this kind. He now took this opportunity of saying, in any debates which affected her Majesty, the part which he took was altogether as a Mem ber of Parliament, for in the situation in which he stood to that illustrious Person, he knew no thing could be more liable to her disapprobatitn, than that her legal advisers should make them selves parties to any discussion particularly af fecting her Majesty. He would now state dis tinctly what was in progress as to the important subject of-her claims, as this was not a nego ciation, and therefore did not require secresy.--- (Hear.)—He understood her Majesty had pre sented a memorial to the King in Council on Monday, not praying to be heard, because she expressed no doubt on the right, but praying to be crowned. Lord Hood saw Lord Sidmouth relative to it, and an answer was promiSed to be returned on Thursday, but no answer was given further than what he had stated, and in con sequence a memorial was that morning pre sented from her Maj e sty, p ra yi ng t o be heard by her Counsel before The Privy Council. In this state of the case he wished to abstain from any discussion on the subject, but he could not help saying that it .was not respectful or courteous to the Queen, to allow her Majesty's application to remain so long without an answer, and (we-un derstood him to say) that two letters which had been addressed relative to the former applica tions were not attended to. lie did not complain of the Law Officers of the Crown on account of the delay, but he complained of Ministers not being able to give an opinion, as he had a right to assume that they ought to have been prepared with an answer, after the opinion expressed by the Noble Lord on the subject two months be fore.—(Hear, hear!) The Marquess of LONDONDERRY found it ne cessary again to repeat that that opinion related to the question as.a matter of discretion; but when - a grave application was made by a legal claim, it ought - to undergo.grave and legal deli berations.—(Hear, hear!) The Report was then received, and the Bill ordered to be read a third time on Monday. The Lotteries Bill was committed, and the Report ordered to be received on Monday next, APPR.OrRIATION . BILL. The CHANCELLOR of, the EXCHEQUER moved that the above Bill should be committed. Colonel DA I , 7 IES wished to know what the expenses of the Coronation were likely to be ? . £lOO,OOO had been voted for that purpose last year, but, looking to the preparations that were making, that .sum would not cover one-fifth of the ex pense. The country ought not to be vut to so enormous a charge for thiS vain and idle pageant. The coronation robes were understood to cost 30.0001. and there was 9,0001. for the hire of an extra crown. All this would not tend to make his Majesty more a king than he was at present. • . The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that in addition to the 100,0001. voted last year, a,vote of money, but not to any considerable extent, would be necessary, to meet some unforeseen expences. Sir M. CHOL3IELE It was of opinion that the additional sum might he raised by voluntary contribution. Mr. SCARLETT understood that five and six guineas were demanded for seats. If a portion of the proceeds were handed over to the Treasury, the expellee of the Coronation might be defrayed by those who had the benefit of seeing it. The Bill then went through the Committee.—Report on Monday. " METROPOLIS POLICE BILL. The Report of the Metropolis Police Bill was agreed to, after a few words from Mr. BERNAL, who suggested the propriety of enlarging the salaries of Police Officers, and making provi sion for such as wer e su p erannua t e d or wounded.—Third reading on Monday. The Report of the captured Slaves;Bill was agreed to.—Third reading on Monday. • • AUDIT OF ACCOUNTS BILL. The Report of the Audit of accounts Bill was agreed to, Mr. MADE Y having previously introduced a clause, providing that an account of the actual surplus or deficiency of the revenue, as compared with the expenditure, should be annu ally made out.--Third reading on Mo2day. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER gave notice, that he would, on Monday, move an address to his Majesty for the usual remuneration for the Officers of both Houses of Par liament.—Adjourned. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH.-THIS DAY. This morning W. 11. E. Floyer, Esq. a Justice of the Peace for Staffordshire, received the sen tence of the Court for publishing certain libels in the Litchfield Mercury on Sir Robert Peel, Bart. lie was adjudged to be imprisoned in the King's Bench for three months, to pay a fine of 10001. to the King, and to find security for his good be haviour for five years, himself in the sum of 20001. and two sureties in the sum of 1000/. each. COURT . OP KING'S BENCH, JUNE 30. Mr. COOPER applied fora rule to show cause why Mr. Jones, the Marshal of the King's Bench prison, should not answer the matters of an affidavit made by Colonel Millie who stated, that in Decemb er l as t h e was a pr i soner i n the King's Bench, and occupied apartments in the coffee-house, at that time k e pt by W. Pool, ,or w hi c h h e pa id 21. B s. a week. The deponent stated, that many irregularities prevailed in the prison ; .and amongst others, Peel was in the habit of keeping his coffee room open to a very late hour. On one occasion, Deponent de sired the waiter to represent to Pool that the noise and carous ing, on account of the state of his health, very much disturbed him. This was at one o'clock onSunday morning. On a sub sequent occasion, Pool, instead of abating . the disturbance, used insolent language to deponent, and desired him to quit the house. After a third complaint, deponent applied to the Mar shal, who instead of redressing the grievance complained of, advised deponent to take lodgings in another part of the prison, least the prisoners c ie masse, should inflict upon him the sum mary vengeance of a pimipiHe.. The affidavit went into com plaints of various other irregularities in the prison, many of which the Court intimated were matters not in the cognizance of the Court; and the affidavit was therefore withdrawn to be amended. We communicate, with regret, the following account of a serious occurrence at Chatham, on Wednesday night. As we have received no sub sequent communication on the subject, we trust the result has not been so disastrous. as our cor respondent seems to anticipate :- 44 CHATUAM, JUNE 27, 11 O'CLOCK, v.M.—A very serious aTray has taken place this evening among the military stationed here. The inhabitants for hours have been in the greatest con sternation, and many have received injuries in their persons or property • they have been under the necek;ity of shutting up their windows and fastening their doors. Report speaks of se veral being murdered, but owing to the confusion that exists, and being near the time of post setting out, am unable to get particulars of the mischief done. The 86th Regiment and the _Marines were the principals in the riot.- G enerals DE snono u II and D'Ancr are in the town, endeavouring to. allay the riot, and very many of the Officers of the garrison. The barrier gates have been closed and every person stopped from going to and from the street to Chatham—at this period every thing, is tranquil.".(lienti*h Gazette.) PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS, Tuesday, fuly 3, 1821. NOTICE OF MOTION. 1. Mr. Spring Rice,—'To move that the Fourteenth Report of Commissioners on Education in Ireland be printed. 2. Mr. Samuel Whitbread,—Motion relating to a Society styl. in,g itself the Constitutional Association. 3. Dr. Phillimore,— Returns respecting Slave Population in the West Indies, Isle ot• France, and toe Cape of Good Hope ; also, a Return of all 3lanumissions effected since January • 1808. onnEg OF THE DAY. Courts of Justice (Ireland), Ninth Report of Comrni.- sioners ;—Committee thereupon. PRICE, OT This DAY Tll 3 per Cent. Red 3 per Cent. Cells. 4 per Cent 4 ?It 5 per Cent. Navy Aar shut C STOCKS vEI. E OCLOCIi. Bank Long Ann.... 19 1-16th India Bonds 535. Excheci. Bills I ° Cons. for °pealing • ••• HIGH WATER AT LONDO: illorrthig, 30 minutes after 4. , cic BRIDGE TO-MORROW- Eveniqg, 47 minutes atter 4. THE s UN. SOLEM QUIS DICERE FALSUM AUDEAT? LONDON, MONDAY, JULY 2, 1821. We received this m 'ruing the Paris Journals of Thursday. It begins to be generally believed at Vienna, that the troubles in the Levant wilt not be put an end to without the interference of the neighbouring Powers. The embargo placed by the Turkish Government on all ships is the Black Sea, is severely felt by Russia, and the state of affairs in Greece and Turkey has caused a total stagnation of the Austrian trade with the Levant ; it would therefore appear that the Em perors FRANCIS and ALEXANDER are disposed to resort to more efficacious means than re monstrances to the Divan, to avert the con- tinuance of these calamitous consequences to the commerce of their dominions. We leant from Trieste that several vessels had arrived there with Christians who had fled from Smyrna ; and that the naval force of the Greeks amounts to .25 0 vessels, forming four squadrons. The first cruizes on the coast of Peleponnesus ; the second near Tenedos, at the entrance of the Dardanelles; the third between Candia and Cyprus, to cover the Cy" clades ; the fourth is the most considerable, it fortis the reserve from which the other divisions re ceive their instructions, and is stationed near Hydra and Psara, where the Greek squadrons send their prizes. A number of students from the German universities arrived lately at Vienna, on their si/Lq to Turkey to join the Greeks ; but passports have been refused them. The Emperor of RUSSIA was expected at Pe' tersburg on the 3d instant, and private letters speak of some important arrests at Warsaw. The King of NAPLES is returned to his Capi tal from Capo di Monte, and has been present at several Sittings of the Council of State. b" Royal Decree re-establishes the Lectures of the Schools of Medicine and Surgery ; and another places the Special Judiciary Courts on th e same footing as before the late Revolution. Th e newly appointed Intendants are desired to re' pair to their respective provinces, on pain o f dis missal. The Piedmontese Government have est 3" Wished a Commission of Inquiry into the conduc t of the piblic functionaries,during the late troubled and the Count of CEnwri is appointed pre sl/ dent. Letters from Toulon, of the 15th inst., stir' ? " The frigate la Jeanne d'Arc, the coretteg Je Golo, la Bonite, la Rus6e, and the galliot l'eg tr fette, ha ve sa il e d ; t h ey are to be joined by `l e frigate la Guerriere, and by Gabarres, PActic e7 la Lamproie, and la Fruite. It is said that th ese • di vessels are to j o i n th e squa d ron which is a lr e a d y in the Levant, The frigate la Duchesse de W r ",.: and the corvette l'Esperance, which were c ru t : a . ing in the Mediterranean, have again put:Vthe It appears th a t th ese vessels, together tte , ship le J ean B art an d the corvette iode to which are now fitting out, are t o prove° America." still .en- The French Chamber of Deputies ' 9 gaged in discussing the Budget. e;fitting of the 27th ult. ; during the debotejoitii voting Suppli e s f or th e C o l on i es B v c.r.taTlS Cos , STANT entered int o some interesting statements regardin g th e con d uct of France O n the subject of the Sla ve T ra d e . li e comp l a i ne d of the i suffici9ncy of th e ex i st i ng law inFrance to re press this d e t esta bl e tra ffi c , an d asked why a more rigorous l aw aga i n st t t .le m ost atrocieus Fa n pmmit had not of climes g malefactor the HOUSE OF COMMONS: . 1 ORDEttS OF THE DAY, for Molizioeot, July k A 1. Bankruptcy Court Bill ;—Committee. I. = 1 c: ‘4 li Asses 'faxes ComPlvititon Bill i—T,liird%eatting.. '-,.. \ `3•Nacket`ssels IgceAcesbi l ißill ;—} iNhv. coatderationNO 1 •,,_tiport. . AV IN ' 1 .4. • I t • , .. 1 'l. Poor Relief Bill;—Adjourned Debate on re-commitment. 5. Tobacco Duties. Bill ;—Further conside rat i on o f R eport. 6. Extra Post Bill ;—Report. 7. Stamps Duties (Ireland) Bill ;—Further Consideration cf :I Report. 8. Custom House Officers Relief Bill ;—Committee. 9. Exchequer Bills Public Works Bill ;--Report. 10. Duke of Clarence's Annuity Bill ;—Third Reading. 11. Lotteries Bill; —Report. .. 12. Appropriation Bill ;—Report. 13. Metropol is Police Bill ;—Third Reading.. 14. Captured Slaves Bill ; —Third Reading. 15. Audit of Accounts Bill ;--Third Reading. 16_ Usual Sessional Addresses ;—Committee thereupon. NOTICE of MOTION, for MONDAY, July 2. , Mr. Powell Buxton,—To move for Returns of Children in ~. IVorkhouscs. , _ PUBLIC COMMITTEES, for Monday Morning, July 2. 1. Opthalmic Hospital atone. 3. Ninth Report, Courts of I 2. Highways - -at one. Justice (Ireland) at eleven.