The Sun. — London, England, 1821-02-01 00:00:00

honnitras she had gained by pursuing an Oppo; site course.—(Hear, hear !)—rle thought ,she' would Inive been wise to give up this point at that period, and at the cohclusion of the trial, -when she must and-did consider her innocence to be established,she.mht have done so with pro priety. He, thought that if her Majesty had- been wise, if animated by a patriotic spirit, or by a regard for the welfare of this Country, She' - would have - given it up then. He thought that even that night she might have wisely abandoned her claiMs. He therefore felt it right to say, that though lie did not presume to condemn, he could not but lament the Message which her Ma jesty had sent 'down. lie thought the_House ought not to depart from that course which it was disposed to take from a general.view of the case in consequence of that Message. In pursu ance of his duty to his country—in pursuance of , - hie' wish to take that course which was most likely cairn 'the agitated mind of the Public, he should vote for going into the Committee. Mr. BaounnAm considered the subjectto have been so fully discussed, that he would have left it to the decision of the House without speaking vs; it, but for one or two olyservations WhiCh had falleo fr'om his lion Friend who had Spoken last. The Queen, as a party; on a trial where acquittal taken place, was - most perversely 'disparaged in more parts of the house - than one. Ile found such: a feeling in 'parts of the House where he could _not possibly lface believed it to exist. ' Under these circumstances lie must crave pardon - while he offered a few "Words to - hi4llOnoura -Ile Friend,- to remind him of what had passed, and to . put it to the House and to his Honourable Friend himself, if he had dealt with c6rUrnon.justice towards the Queen. 'Tito surd of his Honourable Friend's opinion . (for he had, used no argument,) came to this, that the Queen was always wroug,—that others sehOwere opposed to her were always. right.— , 1 011 e labouring under a charge before trial; and in different stages of the trial, and in the peculiar circumstances in which she was placed at the clo:seof it, when a confession, was made,—a con fession - worthy a hundred speeches from the First Lord of the 'PreaAtry.-, a confession made by the Kling himself (the abandonment of the bill) in-a voice so loud, that it reached,every heart in the kingdom,.that inhabited a bosOm open to feeling. The trial.had closed for one reason, and for one alone—because proof of guilt ad not exist. (Cries of Hear, hear, hear l)—Such Was the case with respect to her -Majesty's guilt. He would take the verdict of her prosecutors, half of whom were her judges; vet they who held- ail that was esr to them in the. world, their places, by the .tenure of her Majesty's conviction, they had given . up the Bill. This was no better than a confession on the part of her prosecutors them selves, that she was not proved guilty. His lion. Friend said he agreed with the Queen on the sub ject of the Liturgy, yet he thought she ought to give, it up :—she ought. to crouch after an acquit tal. After her acquittal, and the abandon ment of the prosecution, she was to come forward and conduct herself as a guilty woman; Nothing could be more danzeroui to the tranquillity of the country, than the denial to the Queen of all her rights and immunities. The Noble Lord, on the other side of the House, considered the ques tion of the Liturgy of no importance on .this occasion ; but on the discussion' of the motion made by the Member •for Bramber, the Noble Lord stated it to be a stig - rna.e— The Noble Lord taking a new and distinct view of the subject had been pleased to call the triumph of the -Queen the technical ac quit.ta!—(Hear, hear :)—they had heard it said in that House : suppose the Bill of Pains and , Penalties passes the :House of Lords, -still there will be no bias in thin House, Only let it pass there, and it will came to this House to be consi dered by Men.bers free from prejudice. The Bill, however, did not pass, the Lords; and because it did not come down to them, they were called upon to believe all was proved against the.-Queen, that was, - actually disproved.---(Hear, hear!)—So much for the total absence of all bias and preju dice. Sothething bad been said about the Mes; sage smt down , by her, Majesty, to which he wished to make a few short observations - ,ever.he had seen a message which - in its tone was pacific, it iva4 the Message received by the House that night., The Queen merely said, she under stood the .House were to discuss money affairs, and she begged them to recollect . her situation was a situation to which Parliament had dragged her, and she could not barter away her right for money. If she did, there was an end to safety. The Noble Lord had. suggested, 'that the Ales-- sage might have been spared until the proposi tion-.fur the allowance of money was-known. If she had waited, they would no doubt have been told ,that she was too late, and that-respect for 'the Hone . should have - induced- the Queen to make a more early application. How the Message could be twisted -into dictation he was at a loss to judge. He was assured that these unfortunate discussions could only terminate by making the Queen secure of her rights. - ‘ He could say,.con-' scientionsly and upon his honour, he saw no means of terminating such unpleasant discussions ;unless Parliament did that aCt of justice which. arose out of law. It never could be tolerated that she who had been Queen should be treated as if.she had not. Mr- 11. BRIGHT opposed the adjournment of the question. It was necessary to proceed to discussion with a view to settle the question, and preserve tranquillity. It was the duty of the House to proceed, and make such a grant asjus tice And the Constitution dictated. The Queen bad said she would not receive the grant, and that was the reason why the House,..was bound ; in support of its own dignity, to go on. He, for one, would vote a proper allowance, and say— " There it is ; if you wish to .have it, take it from the Exchequer : yon will not take it, leave it."—(Hear, hear . !)—ThAt was the prin ciple upon which he should vote against adjourn ment. Every man ought on this occasion to . state all he had to propose to tranquillize the country. Mr. MARTIN- (of Galway) rose to make a few observations upon an attempt which had been made to excite a feeling of contempt towards the Hon. Member for 'Hertfordshire. That iron; Member never stated that he wished the Queen's name in the Litnrgy. The Hon. Member said he considered the Queen would have stood in a better plight, NN ith respeCt to the opinion of the House and the public, in case she had.received the Address of that House, recommending her not to insist on her name being re-inserted in the Liturgy. He heard from Gentlethea on the other side.of the House, great deprecation of thing adverse to their views, but thjy did not hesitate to brand all who had been opposed to the Queen with the term wretches, and to use words of irri tation. Was it not irritation for a Member of Parliament to get up and say, he would not vote any money before the Queen's name was re-en tered in t - ho • Liturgy ?—Such words were :never heard within ,those walls before. When the Op position . Was led by Burke and Fox, in the American War, the Members were 'never heard to say, " ifyon do not insert the Queen's name in the Liturgy we will disband your Army—we will not .pay yotir Judges—you shall have no Army—no Courts, if you do not put the - Queen's name in the Liturgy." Would Gentlemen con sider it right to suspend their Parliamentary duty upon 'a mere punctilio ? It was not a punctilio on which her. Majesty's innocence could rests be cause the restoration of her name to the Liturgy did not depend upon any act of her own, , but the acts of .. others. The Hon. Member concluded by voting against the adjournmenL The SPRIKER then put the question for jourhinept, which was negatived without a diision. The original motion, namely, that the SPE:IKF.4 do. leave the Chair, was 'Consequently carried, and he left-the Chair, accordingly. CO:NTMITTEE OF SUPPLY. The - House then went into a Committee of Supply, fir. 13116 . 6bEN in the Chair: ALLOWANCE TO THE QUEEN. Lord CAsTrctiv:AGir said, - the lonc , attention • paid' by 'the riouse to the subject last under dis cussion, denied him the opportunity of giving.ex planations The topics introduced' while the Speaker was in the Chair, he should not discuss in the Committee. He had merely to. state to the House, that .the question this Committee had to deliberate upon, was independent' of the Queen's conduct. They 'had to decide what was the prudent quantum- of allowance ,whiCh ought to be made to the Queen. It was not his intention to advert to any other question: He considered the House was desirous of voting some quantum of provisibn. Fifty thousand pounds per annum had been mentioned, but that sum was not to be taken as the most liberal allowance Parliament would make.' Looking at her Majesty as' Queen consort, she - would be. entitled to a more liberal allowance, but she - was in the situation ,of a Queen separated from her husband. The separation • had been recorded, and recognized by his late Ma jesty. ; land looking at the situation in which the. Queen stood, separated from her husband, the provision she Was to receive was not that which a Queen -Consort, living with her has.; band and children, would have. The Queen in her present' state required a provision suitable to her illustrious rank and station. She re- quire& the same allowance as a Queen Dowager. The Queen, surviving his Majesty, would be entitled. to a dower of fifty thousand pounds a :year ; and it Was reasonable to conclude that.,the Queen livin g separate should receive the same amount o f income- that she would if her husband were dead. In 1814 the Queen, being then Princess of Wales; and separate froM her husband, and there being no reasonable pre- sumption that the separation .would terthinate,! Parliament was resolved to make that provision which she would have received standing in the situation of Dowager Princess of Wales. Fifty thousand pounds were voted, and if that grant was not for life, it was'because the Princess de7. .dared she'would not receive more than 35,0001. Nothing had - occurred io alter that arrangement, and it appeared to the Noble Lord that that sum was a proper allowance. When the proposition was made to her Majesty. at St. Omer's, it was stated 'that the 50,0001. a year, which she was entitled to, would be continued. It was felt that a liberal, not an extravagant allowance, ought to be made for a person of her Majesty's rank and station. On those grounds, 50,0001. were .offered at St. Omer's, which was the sum her Majesty would be entitled to as Queen Dowa ger. -The Noble Lord concluded by moving— " That it is the opinion of this ComMittee that his Majesty be enabled to grant annually the sum of 5G,0001. out of the Consolidated Fund for the sole and separate use of her Majesty, during - her Majesty's life."' Mr. STUART WORTLY said, ha did not rise to allude to any thing which passed with respect to the . Queen's conduct before she came to this Country, but circumstances had occurred since her return, to make him hesitate in placing so large a sum of money in her hands. Let her guilt or innocence-be as it might, there could be no defence for some of the language her Majesty held in her Answers to the Addresses. Her letter to the King also contained language which could not be too much deprecated. It was the chity of Parliament. not to vote money which might be applied to effect the destruction of every institu tion in the country. He defied any•man to read those answers without saying they were not cal culated to overturn the Constitution of the Country. Parliament had before refused to vote sums of money to persons.in the Royal Family, for reasons less than those the Queen's conduct presented. The Hon. Member wished that peace might be restored, and on that ground only lie abstained from proposing an amendment. Lori] Jolts Itu - sstr.r.. rose to say a few words upon the language used towards her Majesty. No person with the common .feeling of genero sity, ought to have come at this time to express reproach for any words contained in a letter sent at the time she was under trial, 'on charges which had not been supported. The Noble Lord ad verted to the accusation of Queen Catherine, the wife . ofllenry VIII., and the words of Wolsey, who declared the Queen guilty of a crime for showing herself to the people. , The Queen was now placed- in a similar situation, and her actions misrepresented; The misfortunes of her family; and the death of her brother, and father fighting for this country, entitle her to protection. . Alderman C. SMITH deprecated the language of the answers which the Queen returned to the AddresSes.. Mr.HumE rose amidst some expressions of im patience, and defended the answers of her Ma jesty to the Addresses. They were Constitu tional trtiths, and he did . not expect some Ho nourable Members to admire them. They ex pressed sound morality, and. were consistent with the Christian Religion. . Mr. STuArt-r WORTJ.EY observed that so far from being Constitutional truths, he considered them seditious libels, and he said he should give notice, when the House resumed, of his int4tion to address the King, to lay the Queen's letter before the House. Mr. MARTIN (of Galway), said the;Answers made by the Queen to Addresses had been gene rally reprobated:in England and Ireland. He did not attribute . fhem to the Queen, but her bad advisers, who had on every occasion injured her in the eyes of the public. Their evil council had invariably been 'mischievous. The circumstance of advising her Majesty to intercede with the King, to save the life of an unfortunate female, had no other tendency than to excite odium against the constituted authorities. Lord MILLON, with a view to alleviate, rather than increase the. pain felt:l)y the parties, im plored his "Hon. Friend. (Mr. Wortley) not to persist in the motion which he had intimated his intention to make.. The opposing sentiments of any two members were. not. sufficient ground for the I-louse to call Upon . the King — for the produc , tion of a letter. Me: STUART WORTLEY . oNpressed himself wil ling to forego his intention. Lord STAN LEY said the grant of 50,0001. was not connected with a Palace, which the late Queen enjoyed. Lord CMTLEREAGII said, the mtrriage treaty signed by the Queen, when Princess of Wales, gave her for dower 50,0001. There was no Palace. The Palate settled on her late 'Majesty was given by letters patent from the Crown. Mr: H. SUMNER opposed- the amount of the grant, as being too much. He had been inform ed that the Queen, since She had been in this country., had paid no tradesmen's bills. It was necessary that a motion should bepade for an account of the sums drawn by the Queen since She had been in this Country. It was reasonable to . " conclude, &the Queen had not paid her hills, that the money had been employed for the worst purposes. Apart of.it had ,been applied perhaps to enable the seditiOns press to circulate daily poison into the public mind. Fifty thousand pounds was more than the Queen was entitled to, after having been separated twenty years' from her husband. The Hon. Member then pro posed an Amendment, viz. to leave out 50,000/. and insert 30,0001. Dr. LitiSHINGTON remarked,-hr terms of vehe ment reprehension, on the conduct of the lion. Member for Surrey, who had dared to say that the 'Queen, had been' proved guilty of adultery. When he heard opinions of this kind Pronounced he declared i .on his conscience, that he thought the'Queen would have more justice if she .were tried by twelve convicted felons, provided tmu a Judge presided who wat not conspicuous for legal 'tergiversation, than by those who would pronounce sentence upon her without hearing a Syllable of her defence. He should like to know how the*Hon. Gentleman Could know that the Queen's adVisers did not reserve some evidence of the Queen's innocence to produce at the bar of the House of Commons, for reasons best known to themselves, and which would have overthrown all imputation against her. He was surprized to hear it asserted in that House, that it was incumbent on her Majesty to prove her innocence, instead of her ene mies being obliged to prove her guilt. Much jtad been said about the sums of money lavished upon the Queen. Why, it so happened that the Queen, since her late arrival in this Country, had spent not a farthing more than at the rate of 35,0001. per annum. It happened to 'him, within one month after her Majesty's arrival, to apply by, letter to. his Majesty's Government for the small sum of 5,0001., which small sum was refused.— But this charitable, honest, upright Judge, for- 1 south, said that be had heard; but who told him God only knew, that her Majesty did not pay her bills. Doubtless, as 'was insinuated, that she expended her money in'paying Newspapers and' other scribes. Stich insinuations were equally unworthy any Member of that House to make, and of any other to answer. Mr. Alderman Woon had hitherto-refrainel from taking any part in this debate, but he could no longer remain silent when he heard such un grounded assertions made as thos which had been advanced by the Hon. Member for Surrey (Mr. 11. Sumner.) As that Hon. Gentleman had stated that many of her Majesty's bills were not paid, lie called upon Whim in his plaS in that House, to state anyone bill which her - Majesty owed. He bad made his assertion roundly, and her Majesty and the House bad aright to expect this satisfaction of him. He could assure the House that her Majesty had paid the whole amount of the expenses she had incurred since her last arrival in this Country, ,regularly dis charging her debts at the, end of every month.— At the end of each month her Majesty called for her accounts, which the Steward presented to her, and received the money in full: He trusted the Hon. Gentleman would either state some fact in confirmation of what he had advanced, or make a full recantation of it. Mr. 11. SUMNER could not answer the call of the Worthy Alderman, as he had already stated, that what he knew of the matter was from ru mour. One or two persons, whom he thought likely to knot - , had informed him on the subject, but he had also heard it generally rumoured. — As he Who had last addressed the Committee was not the accredited agent of her Majesty in that House, he was not bound to receive his state ments ; he should therefore retain his former opinion. Mr. Bitouonim declared, be had never heard any of-the reports alluded to, by the llon. Gen tleman; though, if such a fact existed, he thotight he was in a situation in which he must have known of it. With respect to her Majesty's expendi ture, she had received, in addition to her 35,0001. a year, 50,0001. for law expences. I f the Hon. Gentleman considered this as" too large a sum, he could only say her Majesty and her Legal Ad visers equally , regretted that the Country should have been put to this expense but the Queen had not been the' cause of it ; and large as . the sum, might appear, he could assure the Hon. Gentleman it .would, not near cover the Queen's expences. Mr. 11. SumsEn observed, that what had fallen from the worthy Alderman he was not obliged to give credit to, because he did not know the facts himself. If the Learned Gentleman' oppo site would to-morrow state that he believed it lo be correct from his. own knowledge, he would be satisfied. ~ . 11 Ir. Alderman WOOD said he did not want the credit - of the Honourable Member. • He stated what he knew, not as an accredited -agent,'-but as an individual in his place in that 'House. lie had seen the books of the Steward, and hb•-knew that all her Majesty's bills to tradesmen and others•were paid monthly. - 'Perhaps- to=i - noroNir thellonourable Member with his rum Onr,-'wOnld bring down some bill-which was not paid. ' If lie - did so, he begged to assure-the lion. Member that he would tale care it should be paid. Lord'iNUGENT thought that thellon.:Mernber for Surrey,: ought to apologize to. the Coamiiitee; or the Hon. Alderman, for su.ch:llat'''co:ttradic tiott as he had made use of. • • Mr. H. SUMNER.OtiId 110 t apologize till the Committee directed him to do so. lie me-ant to have stated, to allay any 'irritation that bli g ht o have.arisen iu , the.worthy Alderman's mindat if he had made a statement upon his ors n-know ledge of any thing which concerned himself,• he should give implicit confidenCe to' it'. Since ; however, the worthy Alden - hail had stated_ the foundation of his knowledge, lie was not ft bit the more inclined to give credit to him. It appeared that he saw by- the Steward's books what he paid, but did he see by them • what were not paid ? Mr. BaouonAm observed, in reply to what had been thrown out by the Hon. Member for Surrey, that it was not in his 'province, and would be ex tremely impertinent in him to go to her Majesty's house, and make inquiries into her private con cerns. The utmost he could do would be to in quire of the Steward, as the worthy Alderman had done. • Mr. I3ROGDEN was sorry to say that contradic tion was too much the practice of that 'House.. The-conversation,- however, had gone already too far, and he trusted it would be dropped. Mr. S. WORTLEY,kIid not mean, by his allusions -to the conduct of the Queeu to make any raference to the income she was to receive. It was Ids in tention to vote for. the larger sum ----(hear.) After a conversation,-rendered inaudible •by the departure of. Members ,from the House, between Mr. -WESTERN, the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, Mr. W. SMITJL, and Mr. litrmx, the questions were put by the Chairman in the usual way, and it was'decided that it was the opinion of that Committee, that means shOuld be provided for his Majesty, to be enabled to grant the annual sum of 50,000!. to her Majesty, during her life. The House .resumed, mat the Report having been received, adjourned at HALF PAST TWO, O'CLOCK. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF KIN - CT'i.;7IENCH, JAN. al. THE KING V. 313.3011 CARTWRIGHT, WOOLEII, &C. It will not be forgotten that the'defendants in this case were all of 'them found guilty, at the last Assizes for the County of Warwick, of a conspiracy to bring the House of Commons into contempt, by electing what they termed a " Legislatorial. Attorney" for the town of Birmingham, who was to represent them in Par liament. The Chief Baron was the Judge who presided on the occasion, and the conduct of Lordship at the trial, by refusing to postpone it, was taken exception to by some of the defen dants, who since that time applied to this Court for a new trial on that ground. In last Term the cause was gone into, and a rule Nisi was granted, calling on the. Crown to shew cause why a' new trial should .not be had for the defendants. Mr. ATTORNEY-GENERAL now appeared - to show cause against the rule, and, after stating the grounds upon which the conditional rule was obtained, he proceeded to answer each of them in their order. The exceptions taken were three, first, that the ~Special Jury • had been partially struck by the Master of the Crown Office ; secondly, that the presiding Jtillge overruled the defendants' challenge , to- - the array of Jurors, and prevented certain questions from being asked of them; and lastly, that 'a Juror of the name of Peach was not regularly summoned. In answer to these, the . ..Learned Attorney argued, that the Master of the. Crown Office being the servant of the Court, nesexception could be taken to his. nomination by the parties. That officer was expressly empowered by the Act of George the Second, to " select" and nominate the Special Jury from amongst the freeholders of the county. He then put in that officer's affidavit, in which he. distinctly n e g a ti ve d hi s being actuated by prejudice or partiality in his choice of Jurors on the, present occasion. He then proceeded to skew, that, by the uniform practice of 'Westminster Hall, Jurors wereilet to be asked questions, unless direct partiality was to be imputed to them. - And lastly, as to Mr. Peach's'not being summoned, be put in the affida vits of the persons who served the summonses ; and he observed, that Mr. Peach did not say,, if he had been regularly summoned, he would have attended at the trial. On all these groUnds he submitted that the Rule ought not to be made absolute. - The SOLICITOR-GENERAL, Messrs. CLARKE and LITTLEWOOD, followed in the same steps. Mr. DENMAN was heard on the other side, and all those arguments which he had urged before to obtain the conditional rule, he now p,.peated forsupporting it. On, a subject trite from rei)e tition, it was hard to add any thing new. Mr. HILL was- about to follow Mr. DEVITAN, but it being near four o'clock, the Court declined giving their opinions till Monday. PRICE OF STOCKS THIS 1)A Y . AT TWELVE .O".CLOCK. . , ~ Bank Stock 227 22d : 5 per Cvnt. Navy Ann. 105315 3 pc: Ccnt : 11.1 „ "21 72 . 72 i . intNa !iond, 3 1 . 4e 1 tent CoOS. ' Illiii f 4 '.441-.1iii45,.211. , -..,ti b' P , • 4 per Cents.. HIGIS WATER. AT LONDON'BRInjE Mornin, 23 minutt s alter A. miniates.altor THE SUN• SOLEN GUIS D.ICER L51.1.31 . .4111DEiT ? LONDO,. TIIUPSDAY, FEB R, 1, 1821. From a Gentleman ho on ,Tuesday leftY A lris, and arrived in town this day, we learn that two hundred of the Royal Guards had been• put uP der arrest, on suspicion of having been. roncera ed in the atrocious attempt to destroy the Roy - al Family: . . %I re received this - morning Paris Papers 1...r),)fa the 29th u!t. iactqsive. They .coutailt formation respecting. the horrible atteTnpt cox.- t. nutted on .his M.:JESTY's Palace, in addition to the particulars given hi our Pappr yesterday. It appears that .the `explosion was produc'ed by ~ tiv . l? or six pound's of gunpomier inclosed in a small iron-bvand barrel, which was deposit , ..d one of the Janding-places. of the wooden stair case, which i leads to the exterior gallery oVr" looking the garden, and communicatin2; to the apartments of the SIIN.G. and Mvn tmr. Thv barrel was concealed by a large basket -full of fire-wood. The Attorney-G eneral,.the Prefect of Police, and the KING'S Attorney, insiantly repaired to the spot, and pro,:eedoil to take iii" formations far the di ; scovery of the airthori: or this daring violence. It was currently IT" ported on Monday, that three or (our wen. employed in various works in the intrrior of the Castle, had been arrest. J, and ,thlit it was exrtacted their examinatico-s woald lead to the complete detection of the w hole' Conspiracy. His MAJESTY and all the 'Royal Family displayed the greatest firmness on 6 15 alarming occasion. . „ Private letters from Naples state, that _til° Fsiblic mind in tbat.eapital is exclusively. °era' pied with the great question of Peace or War.. --- ; The impatience of the, people is beyond rii' betinds-;. and the :general opinion thc.re is, -tha t nothing.positive respecting the Corr tress v; ill Lt.' known until after the 20th. -The greatest.e o l l " fidence is placed in the paternal solicitude of t-l ° KINC,, but it is apprehended, that notwithstant l " ing all, his efforts, the Revolution in the NeaP ° l litan Government will be oppose t 1 by the' Mll e( Sovereigns, in which case war must beinevitabl e " Guerillas are organizing in every part of tr te kingdom, under the direction of . Spanish and 8r..."_ tish Office rs ; and a levy en masse will be fc; sorted to in case of. necessity. geveral.of 1i Proyinces.bave purchased a considerabl e nutni ) '~ of volunteers, who have been regularly trainee. Vienna Papers announce the arriva, al I g l, Bach of . the N ea p o lit an Ministers, Car , „ it u I'FO and M arquess R urro ; and 'RN° a ,i t.'': - : .(4'nglislp, French,. Russi an , P russ i an , an d Sa d ' nian Ministers. it is asserted that the KiPg °,,,, iAPLES ordered the Duke de Gar,Lo 'not proceed to Laybacti. .4.; . of Math-id Jour'nals announce the appointment o f. General O'Deontyr., to be Captain-Genera l o .. New Spain, with the prerogatives' and eno l o r meats of Viceroy, and also the appointment s e I Si 0 itrAQ 7 MINA , LOPEZ 8.A.N05 7 ' AGU La°, th ii , ,EmectAN'Auo, and SAN JU4“7, ,all of them t; companions of Generals Rinao and'Quitto(o , ~_ commands ;the most important militarcommandsin tli,- Kingdom. . Acconnts from Constantinople mention tl ilt fresh difficulties daily arise ' in the neoCiatiol' between M. de Si ItAGONO7I) the Russian Musts' ter, and 'the chief Dragoman of the PonTE• lit - was first supposed, that the only matter ill diS : cussion, was the interpretation of some a rticle' :%. the Treaty of Eucharist, whi c h g iv e s 13 ,1 ''''. a great prep on d era ti ng i n fl uence i n th e aff3b.,k's of Moldavia and Walachia ; but it now nPr e3r j , that .several o th er ques ti ons ' are ag it a t e d, su c L as the passage of Russian ships of war f rO r the Black Sea to the Mediterranean, and 0 411 ' %- , pally the mediation offered by Russia in the t,,, 5.. pules between the Po - rte and 'the Servians. The subjects introduced in l'arliament l ast night were so fully discussed, that we have o " l . si t to refer our Readers to the ample rel' °F which they will find in our Paper this daP" -- The MESSAGE from THE QC; I-7.EN 11 ' 1 : 3 ; titer of those measures - which must have be ;, suggested by her ill-advisers. Whether,. iu present state of the - Country,Mr.HoLviE Amendment, proposing 30,0001. a year for be' r 111"EsTY, instead of 50,0001. o ug ht t o .have be ci e rejected, we leave to the consideration of tho s Members of Opposition who are always ceos' f :i. ing Government for extravagant expenditure, " n .. recommending what a ll t rue friends of the o' l ' l- , try ought to support, a system of wise eeonoroJj to reconcile with consistency and a due reg to the national welfare. Sir FitANcts BURDETT appeared in the co rE of King's Bench this morning, and his case. ti ', at proceeding when our Reporter left the pia" two o'clock. • , rt Miss WILSON was prevented from r,vrforn il. 7 last night, by a severe cold, attended with feV 4 : l 7, but her Physif;ians have no doubt of her b e ';;; able to perform on Saturday.—The Lori llf Manor was last nightsubstituted for 4rialerx"o,. WARWICK LAKE, Esq. died yogerday 1114) ;,,e ing, rather suddenly. lie had been Wisposed for '"l",te time, hot not so as to conhne hint wit bin d o ors, and 0; 0' as Tiiesday afternoon, he- had called. to ply 11 . 15 to his Royal Highoesi Ike note of Yo ttu t. at h i, Stable Yard, St. Innes'sPalace.—Wtreiling N. rild Y~~~,Y LONDON: Printed hy .1. B. CABSTA PIS, of No. OrwotoJ-street, Queen-s,luare; pted:•rishe.(l by SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South Moltou-sZrevt, at "n t i . F No. 112. Strand : whn, e AcirtAtisemcnTa, (voit-paid) tutitt be a'l4l:ciscd. •