The Sun. — London, England, 1844-07-10 00:00:00

DAY•) ) 4/; uSC to 4/ 155; to 1/ 145; and Stray, 114 s ; Ilse" 14s to 51; 3s; 'What Berate, and to 41; use- to 41155.; ;o 11 14i ; age 01)0' , S Selling tit ;s doing in have be floe puu toes, 8, 00 !75 basket s Barbadois,, r decline 0 !lady all 0,1 very gc"",`; lln sold .I — av a sold, dry brow' , at 17s exit ° which sr e so dispose d vhich were at 17st ° are like wi se tion 110 14 1,098 bbci h ation BUg° 3,022 bbd.q, this tiro! 2,455 ttc-', year. 1" ",a GuaYr t a ' to 525 Or 'or fine OP nd tine au ritish Plar 4,005 b r I S at the OA e eased abou" hiefly tak e l s , the collir e East 0, 4 I don on tr 16,010 P of ne'3rif s at 245, t: belft on the sPQ4 ion is OW 0 06 conun st it is fuly 94 0 4 ma nifes , scrip tion. o n the In dia a Friday, 6 >od and w ere Sfigar 0,5 rown .„ '4s Per n ot vt, but " sellers , 9 , ° je d a deco„ is aftero?'„ ht si Brought t s t ,ely was .cels of 1 3 c 11 , Drn pe 11 e ,h e princl c.ef v lB9 O of Alawigv t 215 to 20 06! 6d, fin e , a to e d 16 3 v, , 1 1 i t 183 60r . , For j 3, • • ), at ape and 1 85 0e 4, a n i n cl.! to ao u id 0 vere so cua 61 Pet , s t, c d t 'Pr7° - 9-st a ite 7s r g - Lnllhisod aica A. 868 6d, is 6d, trop for blacil supporter n the 1 01 ritiopn• e „, e unabl at 42s r, 3, and ,n, VD" sale of Asit , !} d rc el 2i Per P slon inaica 11111;;., per gl":,,ta, Caic - t e. • t itles cer ith! rands 0.0, s 's4l, ditto 1,..a; pu ns Genes :A. 6d to 36 4 9 1 p at 4 ' S nq .- irits . 1 per pe,r o 2s 3' ,erf . of 11: jo g day o dale• o f arV P dle b tot) ceiv ° N ed only rile The l ie t be was tiv o, into ' es lea it, abO ljt 4 e m ( ld Ile or c i 16' 1 ' o to tioso n , of a 11 ; 40' 3 u clo , p eon' 1416 tl3° g'P ar ° s e q . dy- Of • A. Jo to sfr lard 110 11 ' 5° o r 6° 13 and, c of) of 81. t 'o Ig lt i; o a lthe ral t° ----- I , the Iste lit teif 7,5 q., viz abe tli ' d oa re. bt- 5 . 601, ras diet,o jo oidolf ' te the la are a 6 % of 0 1 i $ 6 10f' so: - o cool GitAlr.lo3ENl) STAR PACKETS. FURTHER REDUCTION OF FARES. SIXPENCE AND NINEPEDICE, Boat and Blackwell Railway included. 1)4 7 ~ From the Brunswick Wharf, Blackwell, ' 4ll,ll Ye includedl at Ten, Eleven Twelve, Three, Six, .and Half-past Seven 4t,s ev . From the Terrace Pier, Gravesend, ' 4l "Lr - Palt Nine, Half-past Twelve, Two,* Four, Six, Seven, and Eight. tre__ l , • On Sundays at Five instead of Two. °re Cabin and Seconi-elass Carriage, Sixpence; Saloon and sta r (Up First-class Carriage, Ninepence. Gravesend, May 29, _ 1844. Tail GENERAL STEAM NAVIGATION CO MPANY'S splendid and powerfld first-class STEAM -44,e appointed to leave LONDON for— •-• Ere u ,UROII and ROTTERDAM, carrying her Majesty's Mails R A Y R IVedn es-aYskid Saturday Morning. 0,,,,,,, —Every Sunday, at Eight, Moining. day '"ErtP—From Brunswick Wharf, Blackwell—Every Thurs at Eleven, Morning. OsT E ,, From London Bridge Wharf, for— touL'un uesdy, Wednesday, Saturday, and Sunday. Pares ' Gll E—Every Wednesday, Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday. C ", g ; anal 4s. iier 4 l- s , — Every Thursday, Friday, and Sunday Morning. Fares, I—Every. Tuesday and Friday, at Eight, Morning. ItAII7IOIITII--P .„„ —very Saturday, at Six, Evening. G •xxv , --Daily at Half-past Nine. a nd e 2BUR GII—Fron% Brown's Wharf; Poplar, every Saturday Ev enin r alternate Wednesday, July 10, 13, 20, 24, and 27, at Ten Dig N,i, From Down's Wharf, Reduced Fares, for— Il ing. ' 4lS TLE—Every Wednesday and Saturday, at Eight, Eve titr,..rALAND—Every Tuesday, at Seven, Evening. ilettnlTON and BA VRE—Every Tuesday and Friday. litursd een ERIGHTON and DIEPPE, every Monday, Wednesday, toy IY, and Saturday. To ~r ' n n and B OULOGNE—The Magician, Daily, according to tide. ,dePart - ur - f r , Berths, for Freight, and for Bills, containing hours o 'e4 t ‘" ar e , .• &e l apply at the Offices, 69, Lombard-street; 37, Leadenhall-street. ,rti,-FTEEN THOUSAND POUNDS WANTED. COMMISSIONERS of the ROYAL ,rteth,,-,s-ItRACE PIER, appointed under the Act sth Victoria, for one, h a •;," aNv Pier at Milton-upon-Thames, in lieu of the present orit ng fic arlY completed the pier, are desirous of raising the U‘. OOor - e.014 to be secured upon their pier and gardens, tolls,. and ',Nava estate, under the powers of the said Act. Persons desirous Nacat'ed,_ ho advance, or any part, in sums not less than 2001., are , ate of , w send their proposals in writing, under seal, stating the street inreat required, and addressed to us at our offices, 2, Arthur "; L ondon-bridge ; or at 20, Harmer-street, Gravesend. July 8 , , 84 By order of the Commissioners, MATTHEWS and HILDER, Clerks. I. WILLIAM LEWIS, at present and for . J to' "ki , -Te months past, residing at the parish of Heston, Ril'e — „, e ,etY of Middles and being a baker, do hereby rs ank t .,;','ea that I bai in i tei t id ex t t o , present a petition to the Court of lae ili;PA'cYUsir, C , London, praying to be examined touch fteon making'eb ts, estate, aa eff:cts, and to be protected from all process '''' Day ii a NU disclosure and surrender of such estate and effects ' ll l( Ait e u eat of iny jest and lawful debts ; and I hereby ihrther give .. tat the V krcl is t o une when the matter of the said p . etition_sh ru all ta b i e , 'ak N - ov , ue a dvertised In the London Gazette and in tne Imo ' vi ta% 'faller one month at the least after the date hereof; as Tie, i nY 4;42' ebtlee hark, this 2d day of July, in the year of our Lord, 1844. ' e raey , k"lng been first read over and explained to me by my ' r Richard Hillier Atkinson. • „ ... Witt i , m, ~ The Mark + of WILLIAM LEWIS. i :• 1 1, Atkin, 27, Carey -street. h S to ! eIIO SE BRAY, at present, and for - . o xt, n ` s ' l 'let ears past, r es idi ng a t N o. 2, H a b er d as h ers - p l ace E as t, ; ''tiv q• t erlt dd ,em, in the parish of Saint Leonard, Shereditch, and I t ote , i et a , '?sex, and being a perfumer, hairdresser, stationer, and k teet, 4 L e DiZ iv ing house for post letters, do hereby give notice that it est, fr . , Lood o 7 l , in a petition to the Court of Bankruptcy, Basing e h b a ts - Niltion. dad tur e ,,P . Mying to be examined toue a hm 11 g pro m c y ess upon ' ffect,' ~r r o e* 1 1nd to be protected f m hereby 0 1 ,,,,,,. disclosure and surrender ro of such estate and Gazette and " 4 17nt of mydebts • and I just and lawful, I ' 4 %Ilen e n etlee, that the time when the matter of the after ' "4 i n the \be, heard is to be advertised in the London ti ,_ e date le,r,4`.orning Sun Newspaper one month at the least - "L year of our Lord 4% witness my hand, this Ath day of July, in iv aness, ,T F. ,ide44. AMBROSE BRAY. attorney for the 14 4,,,' 1, ,a 6, Cornwall-road, Lambeth, Surrey, t4_,LetiorwEitto a prize n anbrose BmY• COFFEE. , fli N EY and lIALLre firriteda delicious Cup of really fine fro e New Duties , N o. 8, Ludgate-hill. from the Establishment of u al whi ch " 1 " earn° into oPe y, Sth of Jane, -'/I,"'OtTINTD. say We haYsio roduced ra TlV on oP o E n N g tE ur t d o a rouRPENcs Poti o l i e k Tea of splendid quality at Three Shillings and Tenpence per The Tea 'Market, No. 8, Ludgate-hill. , No. , SIDNEY AND HALL. and CO. Te YARD St. PAUL'S CHURCH . the Inhabitants of the Met o lis, the Noblemen, Gentlemen, a nd Famines througho ut r the United Kingdom. t h TEAS. Mlgp s e -2d of June, 1844, we OPENED the extensive PRE - Of SE L L!°. 1, St. PAUL'S CHURCHYARD, for the purpose On TEAS, COFFEES, SPICES, gcc. be We h r Z e asion of our doing so, we are anxious . that the ad . vantag . a ll n 'T oUt, and the system generally on which our busi . ness will ° l;c ue ted, will be clearly understood; and we will convince you, L sod 'Pee ious arguments , but by truth stamping our assert i ons, int e ;nl b e i ng e assertion s borne out by our actions, that it Is the 4 4 ; - iiettt of all Who want good and pure teas to purchase from us. twill first est a bli s h t h e f ac t th a t w e will sell none but g o od se condly, we w i ll pledge ourselves to keep none but pure .11(1. thirdly, the prices of our teas shall be on a scale of libe ~iiti3irrnitherto unequalled. Pi t hen. "we will sell none but good teas." We have Sa t p ur chase good teas—we have been long celebrated for Ate:nay i n discriminating good t eas — we h ave an anxious de tutvio select • good teas—we have an infl ex ibl e d e t erm i na ti on t o h Y ' G od t eas —and we have, beyond all these powerful motives, Clot inte rests to consult in se lli ng goo d teas. dly, " we will pledge ourselves to keep none but pure teas," Po rta would particularly desire attention to this fact, the vast irn wt'ee of which our subsequent remarks will show. %c c ,: Would refer you to our opening circular, for a statistical Nin e 4 , t , of Three Millions Four Hundred and Seventeen Thousand of T ea." and Fifty Pounds of trash, dignified by the name kih,, ' . 4e a." that has been purchased at the Tea Auctions in Pou h - T B- lane at the average rate of Three-pence Halfpenny per ha 4 7, ( duty excluded), and after passing through various hands, th e 4 ‘ , length reached the canisters of the retailer, and finally To of the consumer. hid den e taY this long: gigantic evil - and to protect you from this *id e: grievance shall be our study, and with your co-operation, 0 o ut privil ege sch, e r Position in the market enables us at once to possess our. Ptic Of. ,, the best teas imported;, and we fearlessly assert that . the than Q t ou scale coupled with the excellence of their quality, w e on a of liberality hitherto unequalled. itldg e brin b ft .„, gto our undertaking proved experience, discriminating hs - `ur, and inflexibility of resolve. With integrity to uphold igrl uenDiedge ourselves, by well-directed energy, untiring industry, lar Ying courtesy, to merit the patronage we now solicit. lie . a BLACK TEAS PER POUND. k. 2 s. 2 d. A particularly agreeable Tea, replete with goodness. nd ta 6 d• This is an old - f as hi one d fi ne T ea, suc h as th e E a st ne 3, ; ,owlpany used to bri ng over . (Id ' A matured Tea, with plenty of strength and good 4 , 3 An acceptable Tea to the Public in general. °. 1, 7 8. GREEN TEAS PER POUND. 1; :nd tieb v u bes. Tfhinsais in the highest perfection both for strength N ° pl~rored °d. of A very d esirable r Green Tea, and will be greatly Ile . 4 ) kl • 4s. 6 This is a good Hyson Tea. h • thrn Tea will give °I3 ale • 1. 0 , 4 end. lev ier rim Priced Teas, but the above s . are what we can re. F l • 4 1 : 14 - t w°, De l l 'leliests of different sorts of fine and rare Teas will and b arst ", e head s "! in spection in the Upper Rotunda, .where ladies t* s bu m : l l l l 'N th e . O ' large establishments may make their selec ion , ea t . their orders apart from the ordinary bustle attendant on tt,, h e arti e i. of l COFFEES. t,en e to -.'4 15° th oi ' t i e i ° ffee has for some years past attracted the attest. \ g t the ~,,pe anel introducing Governments, their object being Cov er ' Qt khere rr • rah - P- " , by it at a cheaper rate. d avouring to alter the nn lettt, d s the Presidentof the B . oard of Trade in the late al "Med considerable time in en e Bir Itob ions intaot °14441:4s laws which existed in regard to coffee, but strong qu 'l in g teZ t • erests that period prevented him from carrying his I)"i erftd : en l' eels with great determination, notwithstanding the eelkbrat- interests arrayed against him, at once reduced (in Bd. !r lb ed T ariff) the duty on foreign coffees from ls. 31 to tate. tse 4t p . d the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in his financial . s to ed ' 41 4 the present session, announced a further reduction ' Per lb,, e et'a..-.. Lbg- 'lt is most important to exte d nd wh th ic e h us t e n o a f a a . rlitiod,vnich is a great luxury to all classes, a . n A' th e f ound to supersede other beverages detrimeital to , health. heae honour of being the first to afford the public the full b w e- e eor if ,'" these philanthropic measures has fallen upon ourselv s e t s a , to,r,"ebtlY call tes upon her Majesty's Ministers, Government •,. a bevcra3e as coffee, , t , „. a . u . d all who desire to see the liberal intentions of so nutri tio„.vg b ut s and who wish to enjoy , in its greatest purity, Noblemen 110 1, I to confer on us their valuable support. COFFEES PER POUND. perfection. )4 0. 2. s. Inod. This Mocha is in the highest state of NI is ' csd• This is a rich, mellow Coffee, generally preferred, li o. -- • Very desirable. IV° . , I °' 4 d. This is a very good Coffee. 4 , la. Od. This is a useful Coffee. lty.enalediate qualities' i s. 6 id., and lower priced if required. th.._ v have dwelt thus particularly on teas and coffees, not because 507 .articles will be pre.eminently distinguished for their goodness ey. apneas beyond spices, &c.. but as a mirror to show forth our ,ete ousin th W e ha business. -eta. ° s great . ve taken our premises in the centre of the world' cor iita P °l . lB ; we have endeavoured in every way to render them titne, l V t° u 3 , convenient, and comfortable ; but we shall at all ey„ ~•! ° bilged to any friend who will enable us to amend what- Wt r 7Y he amiss -to right whatever may be wrong-to rectify, elpia74. improve as may be thought desirable. Qua as b efore-mentioned, is No. 1, St. Paul's Churchyard, turtl e tr im ! of Lud gate-street, a position with which all the inhabitants 1 ,,,.." great city must be familiar, being also well known to the in wrogeerable concourse of strangers who daily visit St. Paul's, and w Patretage, one and all, we earnestly invite. 4 '4 the anxiously solicit Gentlemen, Hotel keepers , Inn holders, b y _ e PUblic at large, in the country as well as London, to profit ateevUr ndertaking, and we pledge ourselves that all orders, recZ a bied by a respectable reference, or a money order, shall receive our prompt and careful attention. It t ,,,_ Nv only remains for us to invite you, in return for having f-'%Olted your comfort, convenience, and advantage, to do us the 47 0 rof testing our assertions. Your obedient servants, DAKIN and CO.. Tea Merchants, * * No. 1, St. Paul's Churchyard. of p t ,e Our yaw Will deliver teas, coffees, &c., within eight milesJ - ' 5 .. rata, ui all directigns,—July 6,1844. / (,-,- ~.------ . ..l. Qi 2 c 1 Z 1„-- -- .0"- --- ' .?..11-1 . -,,,, s'• ~. 4. - ,44,.., . %tii 4 9 1v iii; ii , ~, . / ' • , : 7_ , : . --, r,- ..-.-- tt-4 4 .v , ...„,..„....„ ‘ s -4) „ • 0. - u r • At- -,„ ,: ....k . , . 4 ‘l4 , ...,..-t-e..*..k -4. - • ~. • ! * i'' • ' * I ot ~...• \ "i I , 7 te ' ------- '. .`j _ -xll, • , 0 .ts' • , ' )/' ' • ...e , ./.' ' ''''. 1,-: , v r if:1: ,- '441 ~.. i /, , ,: ~,,,,,,..,,,---- , K r 7 . \ ' ''''''V''' ' .- • :.. , • t...• 1 I.:---).• il •ty 1 c " ,/,;' .' '' .w •Ae• .hy - ,r , ,f ; , __..s. .:- . --- ' 4 . • L .' 4 4, •' • $., ~+0 . 1 . *'''' *is ;.- ,' 4 - P- 411 .1‘ '''' '--440:4 -, N —. ,L..,..._ ,:. • V ., ' (...-,:-',. g , ~- . ,t„ -. `v .., ,-- 60,,,,.., ,k, _______ - _„ ~;i - , t• , 1 1-. k w filtr,••o_.o , -' :11.'"if ,- ~: , Zys t '. ;' \'• , .. !, ":-. .! 1 t ' titi,' .....,,t ,..„ -:‘—% '' .4 /14, -.7; MY , '" "' ' ' , 5, '-;.: l l.lvill 2 *„, 1) .,i, 3 g4!;:t.,: - " - , , orrt 1 ~ ..:-...1 . - - 1 1 , 1 ;- ------ . .-1 . ) - ' 1 ---- I .., ,,, ,,.....1‘„.0c, :: x i s ~.. No. 16,193, LONDON, WEDNESDAY EVZNING 4". ,„ tv , • JULY 10, 1844. 9 PRICE sd, THE SUN is Published EVERY MORNING at FIVE O'CLOCK, in Time for Me EARLY TRAINS and TOWN DELIVERY; a SECOND EDITION (Evening Sun) is Published in Time for :the AFTERNOON TRAINS and a THIRD EDITION at SEVEN O'CLOCK, for POST, containing PARLIAMENTAR I and all other NEWS in LONDON up to that Sour. ADVERTISEMENTS INSERTED in ALL THE THREE PAPERS, Morning Noon, and Night, thereby insuring a TOWN and COUNTRY CIRCULATION, at ONE CHARGE. NATIONAL LOAN FUND LIFE ASSUR ANCB SOCIETY, 26, CORNIIILL, LONDON. Capital Z 500,000. Empowered by Act of Parliament. DIVISION OF PROFITS. The steady success and increasing prosperity of the Society has enabled the Directors, at the last annual investigation, to declare a second Bonus, averaging 60 per cent. on the amoants invested ox each Policy effected on the Profit scale. EXAMPLES. t•JU g g*T oti 4 ra. IS s. d. s. ds 12 3 $ 346 2 3 9 16 4 2% 13 4 I 7 11 9 247 4 i I Zs ' .1 PI 0 Premilua. Bonus added. Bonus fa Cash. IZ s. d. 1837 170 9 3 74 2 4 r ' 1838,,144 2 2 1839 116 16 • Z s. d. X s. d. 77 S 1 64 i 6 51 i 11 ~oliooo I ivisioa of profits is animal, and the next will be made in De- camber of the present year. This institution offers many important and substantial advan tages with respect both to Life Assurances and Deferred Annuities. The assured has, on all occasions, the power to borrow, without ex pense or forfeiture of the Policy, two-thirds of the premium paid, (see table) ; also the option of selecting benefits, and thi conversion of his interests to meet other conveniences or necessity. Assurances ter terms of years are granted en the lowest possible rates. F. FERGUSON CAMROUX, sec. NATIONAL LOAN FUND LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY, 26, CORNHILL, LONDON, July 2, 1844. Notice is hereby given, that the HALF-YEARLY INTEREST, at the rate of 5 per cent, per annum on the Capital Stock of this So ciety, due on the 30th ultimo, together with the bonus of 236 per cent. declared thereon, will become PAYABLE on the 10th Instant ; and Proprietors may receive same on that or any subsequent day, between the hours of Eleven and Three o'clock. By order of the Court of Directors, F. FERGUSON CA.AIROLTX, Secretary. LONDON, EDINBURGH, and DUBLIN LIFE ASSURANCE, 3, Charlotte•row, Mansion-house, and 18, Chancery-lane, London. The more than usual success which has attended this Company has arisen— From the combination of advantages formerly obtainable partly from proprietary and partly from mutual societies, thereby affording to the assured bonuses, reduction of future premiums, and complete freedom from responsibility. From the indisputability of the policies, leave to travel beyond Europe, the option of payment of one-half of the premiums for the first seven years, and immediate settlement of claims. Prospectuses and rates forwarded by the agents and Manager. ALEX. ROBERTSON, Manager. L ONDON LIFE ASSOCIATION, No. 81, KING WILLIAM-STREET. PRESIDENT.—Sir John Chettham Mortlock. VICE-PRESIDENT.—SIT Claudius S. Hunter, Bart., Alderman. TRUSTEES. Charles Franks, Esq. Michael Gibbs, Esq., Aid. I Dease Barnwell, Esq. Charles Perkins, Esq. DIRECTOILS, Richard Beggslley, Esq. Henry Luard, Esq. Thos. Bulcock Burbidge, Esq. Thomas Moore, Esq. Matthew Clark, Esq. Isaac Nicholson, Esq. Charles Druce, Esq. Josiah Roberts, Esq. William Gilpin, Esq. Thomas Saunders, Esq. George Hodgkinson, Esq. Wm. Flexman Yowler, Esq. This Society is essentially one of Mutual Assurance, in which the Premiums of its Members are reduced after seven years to the lowest amount consistent with safety. The average rate of reduction, during the last seven years, has exceeded 60 per cent. But the Society also undertakes • other descriptions of Assurance, in which the assured do not become members ; and in order to confer on these a corresponding advantage of Reduced Premiums, the Court of Directors, having ceased to allow any Agency Commission, have determined to effect this Class of Assurances in future at the follow ing very low rates, and it has also been determined to reduce the Premiums charged upon existing Policies of the same Class to the same Scale. ANNUAL PREMIUM FOR THE ASSURANCE OF £lOO. AGE. £S. - d. II AGE. XS. d. A GE. £S. d. 20 1 13 7 34 2 7 6 50 4 1 2 25 1 17 0 40 2 15 5 54 5 1 0 30 2 1 5 45 3 6 0 60 6 5 10 The Court of Director- horised by the Deed to lend money on the s, policies in this Associt Y JAMES BROOKE, i are aut :urity of HENI of Settlement iation. Secretary. IMPERIAL AUSTRIAN LOAN of 30,000,00 0 FLORINS, authorised by his Majesty the EMPEROR of AUSTRIA. On the 2d of SEPTEMBER, 1844, there will take place at VIENNA, the DISTRIBUTION of 700 GAINS, amounting to 70,1701. sterling. There being only 700 Bonds in all, each Bond must obtain one of the above 700 Gains,.the highest of which are 23,0001., 5,0001., 1,5001., 1,0001., &c. &c., and the lowest 501. each. A few Bonds can be had for 1251. each, or with the deduction of the 501., which they must at least obtain, for 751. Halves and fifths proportion, being a considerable reduction from the former price. LOAN of the GRAND DUKE of BADEN of 5,000,000 FLORINS, NEGOTIATED in the YEAR 1841. The SEVENTH DISIPRIBUTION will take place at Carlsruhe, publicly and irrevocably on the Ist of AUGUST, 1844, when 400 Gains will be obtained. One tl.3in of 35,000 florins, 10,000, 5,000, 3,000, &e. The lowest Gains being 65 florins each ; and 12 florins are equal to 11. sterling. - Price of a share, 10s. ' • Eleven for 5/. ; Twenty-three for 10 /. , &c. For full particulars and Bonds of the above loans apply to Messrs. J. A. Schwarzschild, Bankers, Frankfort-on-Maine, or, to save postage, all applications by letter can be addressed, Mr. A 3chwszzs child, Plough-court, Lombard-street, London. SILVER SUPERSEDED, and those corrosive and injurious metals called Nickel and German Silver sup planted by the introduction of a new and perfectly matchless ALBATA PLATE. ----- C. WATSON, 41 and 42, BARBICAN, and 16, NORTON-FOL GATE, aided by a person of science in the amalgamation of metals, has succeeded in bringing to public notice the most beautiful article ever yet offered ; possessing all the richness of Silver in appearance —with all its durability and hardness—with its perfect sweetness in use—undergoing, as it el GNI , a chemical process, by which all that is nauseous In mixed metals is entirely extracted--resisting all acids— slay be cleaned as silver, and is manufactured into every article for the Table and Sideboard. Fiddle. Threaded. Ring's. Table Spoons and Forks, per doz 16s. 6d. .. 30s. Od. .• 355. Od. Dessert ditto, per doz... • ..• 12s. fid. • • Ms. 04. • • 28s. Od. Tea Spoons, per doz. ...... ls. fid. • • 12s. fid. .. 13s. 64. Sugar Tongs, each Salt and Mustard Spoons, each Communion Services, &c. _ C. Watson begs the Public will understand that this metal is peen iarly his own, and that Silver is not more different from Gold, than his metal is from all others ; on its intrinsic merit alone heiwishes it to be tested, and from the daily increasing eulogtums he `receives, he s convinced that nothing cai preveat its becoming an article of uni versal wear. C. Watson's handsomely Illustrated Catalogue and Price Carrent :s just published, and families who regard economy and elegance, should possess themselves of this useful book, which may be had gratis, and post free, from the above address. Ivory Table-knives, Ils. per dozen, Dessert, 9s. ; Carvers, 3s. 6d. per pair. TABLE. DESSERT. CASTERS. doz. doz. pair. 31-in. handsome balance handle ..• • 183. Od. 14s. Od. 6s. Gd. 1-in balance handle, largest and best made.. ••• • • . 20s. Od. 16s. Od. 7s. 6d. Ditto with Watson's Albata Plate handles, equal to silver ••••• • • • • • 225. 6d. 18e. Od. Bs. 6d. Forks half the above price. Paper Tea-trays, 355. the Set of Three; very richly ornamento SOs. the Set of Throe. A Five Quart London made Bronze Tea-urn 355. up to 51. A Set of Six London made Dish Covers 18s. 6d. ; Imperial Raised Patent, 355. 6d. the Set 01 Six. WATSON'S, 41 and 42, BARBICAN, and 16, NORTON FOLGATE. These houses have for Fifty Tears ranked pre-eminent for their tlery, which is always exchanged, if not approved. Bend for his Catalogue. MAGNIFICENT DAMASK TABLE CLOTHS, 5 yards long, each lss. Od. Dinner Napkins to match, yard square, the dozen lo s. 6 d. Irish Cambric Handkerchiefs, equal to the finest Fsbnch, per dozen l2s. 6d. Common Lawn Handkerchiefs, ls 6,1 per dozen ; very good, . . . per dozen Undressed Irish Linen Sheetings, very superior, per pair l2s. rid. Ditto, nearly 3 yards wide, without a scam, per pair lss. Od. Common Linen Sheetings, from 3s. Pd. per pair ; and very strong, for servants' use, per pair Irish Linen., stout and free from dress, the piece of 26 yards, for 21s. Od. Ditto, excellent quality, 26 yards for 255.; and very fine, 26 yards for .3os. Od. Yard-wide Irish, of the purest flax and finest texture, 26 yards for ... 425. Od. The Directors of the NATIONAL LINEN COMPANY, in riving publicity to the prices they are selling their MANUFAC TURES at, and feeling confident, from the increased facility of communication from their factories, they can Obi' unprecedented advantages to Ladies requiring household linens, &c., will forward ;pods to families residing either in town or country, for approval previous to the payment, and any article sent not giving the most unqualified approbation can be returned. 'I he Company are also bleachers of long cloths, calicoes, counterpanes, rnuslins, dimities, &c. They respectfully sol.cit inquiries of the numerous families, both in town and country, who have patronised their establishment, and who can testify not only to the advantageous prices, but to the sur r r . i s ority te o se f s t manufactures c h o e n ir taining a 1 a tea o cp full arti n cu d * the various goods for sale, with lists of prices, can be had at the warehouses, or by post. Retail entrance, 105, Fleet-street, corner of Farringdon-street, bottom I of Ludgate-hill. THE NEW HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT The various buildings that honour the City Have often been chosen as themes for a ditty; Nor shall " The New Houses of Parliament" go Without a few verses from M OSES—IsTo, no ! We'll show the good reader, before we are done, How they bear on the houses of MOSES and SON. While the" Houses of Parliament" shortly will stand, As the principal Court in Britannia's land, The Houses of MOSES and SON are displayed, A s the principal mart in Britannia's trade. To the good of the public they both are devoted, And both with the people are equally noted. Our Houses are open to grant a" RE-Daass," Nay, all must a striking resemblance confess. Of course we are not at a loss to decide Which Houses de serve to be viewed as the pride. The good that the public derive ev'ry day Must oertainly give to ova Houses the sway. With regard to the wonderful architect's skill, We've little or nothing to mention. But still, We doubt when the " Parliament Houses" are done, If they rival the Houses of MOSES and SON. anew( MADE. Z s. d. Tweed Taglion isT from 0 8 6 Ditto, superior quality, with silk collars, cuffs, and facings.... 0 16 0 Cashmerette coats in a variety of shapes, handsomely trimmed I 0 0 An immense stock of Holland and lean blouses ....... from 0 3 6 Splendid summer vests from 0 2 6 An endless variety of cashmere and Persian vests, splendid patterns .3s. to 8 6 Washing satin vests, warranted Cloth trousers. from 0 9 0 Single milled does from 0 11 6 A great variety of summer trousers from • 7 0 Dress Coats edged. from 1 0 0 i Frock ditt0.........................•.... 000000000000000000000000 ...• ROYAL POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTION, LONGBOTTOM'S PHYSIOSCOPE exhibits the human face with its varied expressions, on a gigantic scale, curiously contrasted with the living man. Tho OPAQUE MICROSCOPE magnifies ef fectively a succession of WORKS of the FINE ARTS ; also casts of INSCRIPTIONS, taken by Miss Wilson from the WALLS of the TOWER of LONDON; cut by. Lord Guilford Dudley and other State Prisoners. Arrangements have been made for 1)r. RYAN to deliver VARIED LECTURES on the evenings of Monday, Wednesday, and Friday; and Professor BACHHOFFNER on Tuesday and Thursday evenings. These Lectures, as well as tke Morning Lectures, will abound in interesting experiments. ARMSTRONG'S HYDRO ELECTRIC MACHINE. DIVING BELL and DIVER. NEW DISSOLVING VIEWS, &c. &c. The Music is conducted by T. Wallis, Mus. Dee. _ _ _ . PAR COURRIER EXTRAORDINAIRE, LA. SUITE DU "JUIF ERRANT." LE COURRIER DE - L'EUROPE (Bohain's French Newspaper) will publish, every Saturday, two chapters more than any other London journal of the WANDERING JEW, by the Author of "Le Mysteries do Paris." , Le Courrier de l'Europe, during five years, has presented to the English reader a complete resume of the news of the week, and textually all the best articles on politics, and literature, romance, and poems, &c., published in the Parisian newspapers. Subscriptions, 6s. 6d. per quarter, received at the office, 10, Wel lington• street ; by Joseph Thomas, 1, Finch-lane, Cornhill ; and all newsmen. Single Numbers, 6d. each. Those containing the com mencement of " Le Juif Errant" may still be obtained as above. The Fourth Edition, with important additions, price Bs. 6d. ATREATISE on INDIGESTION; illus trating the Symptoms, Causes, Varieties, and Treatment of the prevailing Disorders of the Stomach and Liver, with Observations on some painful Complaints originating in them, especially Nervous Affections, and showing the debilitating Effects of Carbonate of Soda. By T. J. GRAHAM, M.D., &c. " We sincerely recommended it, and have long been convinced that such a work was imperatively called for."—London Medical Journal. " It is evidently the result of close attention to, and much expe rience in the subject. Mr. Abernethy spoke highly of it."—British Magazine. fondon: Published by Simpkin and Co., Paternoster-row ; and Hatcharda, 187, Piccadilly. Of whom may may be had, by the same Author, Eighth Edition, price l(e., 2. MODERN DOMESTIC MEDICINE ; a comprehensive Medical Guide for the Clergy, Families and Invalids, with a copious Collec tion of Prescriptions, &c. &c. " It is altogether deserving of permanent popularity."—London Weekly Review. 3. On the DISEASES of FEMALES ; a Treatise in which the subject is fully considered, With Cases, and a Medical Glossary. Third edition, price Hs. " It is an admirable performance, and should find a place in every family establishment."—Bath Herald. " It contains a mass of information invaluable to those for whom it is intended, and surpasses, in value any other book of its character." —Blackwood's Lady's Magazine. THE PHYSIOLOGY OF THE PASSIONS. " How to live happiest, how avoid the pains, The diappointments, and disgust of those Who would in pleasure all their hours employ." Elegant pocket edition (20 engravings) price is., by post Is. 6d. N CHASTITY—its Abuses and Diseases—On Marriage—On Infelicitous and Unproductive Unions—On Ma rital Eligibility and Unfitness—Law of Divorce. By R. J. CULVERWELL, M.D., Member of the Royal College e Surgeons. " Not it vain such laUours have we tried, If ought this book, the fickle health confirm. To you, ye Delicate ! I write for you, I tame my youth to philosophic cares, And grew still paler by the midnight lamps." Art of Health. Sherwood, 23, Paternoster-row; Carvalho, 147, Fleet-street Hannay, 63, Oxford-street; Mann, 39, Cornkill ; and the Author, 2 Arundel-street, Strand. At home, daily, till Two, evenings, Seven till Nine. LAMERT ON DEBILITY, NERVOUSNESS, AND ALL DISORDERS ARISING FROM EXCESS, &c. " He who in pleasure's downy arms Ne'er lost his health or yeuthfir Ichareas, A hero lives, and justly can Exclaim, in me behold a man I" Justlaublished (in a sealed envelope), Tenth Edition, price is. 6d., or sent by post, free, to any address, 3s. 6d., SELF-PRESERVATION : a Popular Essay en those concealed disorders originating in youthful excesses, and terminating In Nervous Debility, Local and Constitutional Weakness, and all those Sinking., Anxieties, and Tremors, which afflict the Weak, the Bedentary, and the Delicate, With Practical Observations on Marriage, and on the Anatomy, Physiology, and Diseases of the Reproductive Organs, with plain Directions for their perfect Restoration. nx SAMUEL LAMERT, Consulting Surgeon 9, BEDFORD-STREET, BEDFORD-SQUARE, LONDON, Matriculated Member of the University of Edinburgh, Honorary Member of the London Hospita 1 Medical Society, licentiate of Apothecary's Hall, London,&c. " The various positions of Lover, Husband, and Parent, the in herent privileges of mankind, are frequently marred and prevented through the follies and frailties of early indiscretions. To such, among others, this Essay addresses itself ; and by its perusal many questions may be satisfactorily adjusted that admit of no appeal even to the most confidential friend."—Staffbrd Gazette. "The design of this work will be tolerably obvious from its title, and we cordially recommend the author and his book to all who are snaring from nervous debility and general weakness."—Wakefield Journal. Published by the Author, and sold In London by S. Gilbert, 51 and 52, Paternoster-row; Starie, 23, Tichbome.street, Quadrant, Regent street; Hannay and Co., 63, Oxford - street; Noble, 114, C hancery_ lane; Gordon, 146, Leadenhall-street ; and by all Booksellers. At home every day till Three, and from Five till Ei ht. THE STATE TRIALS• (FIFTH DAY.) WRIT OF ERROR. HOUSE OF LORDS, July 9. 'THE QUEEN AGAINST O'CONNELL AND OTHERS. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, for Ireland (in continua tion from our Afternoon Edition of yesterday), said— The;challenger stated that fifty-nine names were omitted which ought to have been returned ; and he then went on to state that from the said paper writing a certain book, purporting to be the jurors' book for the year 1844 was made up, from which the special jury list was made out. It was not denied in the challenge that a general list was made up by the Recorder—that it was delivered by him to the clerk of the peace—that the clerk of the peace made up, in pursuance of the Act of Pdrliament, a book from the general list, which he delivered to the sheriff, and that the sheriff from that made up the special jury list; yet it was now contended that this omission invalidated the jurors' book, though the omission might have either occurred through mistake on the part of the Recorder's registrar, or at the dictation of one of the defendants, or any other person unconnected with the Croivn. He certainly thought their Lordships would come to the conclusion that it would be impossible for him, on the part of the Crown, to take issue on an aver ment of that kind, and that he should be guilty . of a breach of his duty to the Crown if he had joined issue upon it, and, notwithstanding all the obloquy which he had been suffering in consequence of it in Ireland, he was the more strengthened in the opinion that he had acted properly, because his Learned Friend the'Attorney- General was of opinion that he ought not to have done so. He begged to call their Lordship,i'_attention to sec tions 35 and 36 of the Act of Parliamerii,,which would show in what cases names which were omitted might be inserted. In the 35th section of the Act there was a specific provision to meet the particular case of fraud, and' penalties were provided if it was proved that the collectors had fraudulently omitted any names, and in that particular case the book was to be corrected, if there was either a wilful insertion or omission of names, which ought not to have been inserted or emitted. The 36th section stated the penalties which should be suffered by persons who were found guilty in this respect, and it gave power to the justices before whom such conviction took place, to certify to the clerk of the peace that such wrong omission or insertion had occurred, and the clerk of the peace was to make a list in which such wrong insertion or omission was to be cured. Thus their Lord ships would see that the Act of Parliament had specifi cally provided for those cases where there was a wilful insertion or omission of the names, and the means of amending such insertion or omission was pointed out ; yet it was said that he should have made the amendment _ _ in the list in defiance of the Act of Parliament, which specified those particular cases in which the Act of Par liament provided that amendments were to be made. Lord CAMPBELL—Had you consented, with the con sent and privity of the traversers, that such a course shouldbe adopted, could the traversers have assigned for error that the Act of Parliament had not been properly complied with? The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland) apprehended that in that case the jurors' book would not be a good jurors' book, and if the parties challenged that they were tried by names not in the jurors book, his consent would not be a good plea to the challenge. He submitted that it was really the object of the Legislature to take away the challenge to the array, and to preclude the sheriff from exercising any control over the list. The next point to which he should call the attention of their Lordships was that of the pleas in abatement. Their Lordships would understand, from the manner in which the record was made up, that all these pleas in abatement exactly corresponded with each other, without the slightest difference. They all sought to raise this question, that the witnesses before the grand jury ought to have been sworn under the provisions of the 58th of George 111., that is to say, they ought to have been swore in open court, and that, not having been so sworn, the proceedings were altogether illegal. Now, he con tended that all these pleas were both insufficient and informal. Both in England and in Ireland it was necessary that pleas in abatement should be verified. Now there was no allegation that the names •f the wit nesses who were sworn were unknown to the plaintiffs in error. He then cited from Comyn an opinion of Lord Holt on this point, where that learned authority stated that a matter could never be assigned as error which the party might have pleaded in abatement, as it must be taken for his own folly that he had omitted to do so. The whole object of the assignment of errors in fact was to amend the plea in abatement. For this purpose only one error in fact could be assigned though as many errors in law might be assigned as a party pleased. As only one error in fact could be assigned, they could not allow that to be assigned as an error in fact at two periods of the same proceedings, which they would not allow to be assigned as error twice over. He submitted that on the principle laid down in the authori ties already cited, they could not assign an error in fact and use it as a plea of abatement also. It could be proved by the Journals of the House of Lords, that their Lordships, on a writ of error, would not investigate matters of fact in error, and would not, therefore, re verse a judgment on a matter of fact ascertained. Lord CAMPBELL—I believe if you look at the books you will find that in nullo est erratum admits the fact, and if you wish to traverse it, you must deny the fact. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland)—He would apply himself to that point. Upon an assignment of error, the Court of Queen's Bench could not have denied any of the facts in dispute. Lord CAMPBELI.—Do you say that if the record were brought by writ of error to the superior court, that court could not review the judgment of the court below, and overrule the error assigned in fact ? The ATTORNEY - GENERAL (for Ireland)—l respectfully submit that to your Lordships. The LORD C HANCELLOR—It comes here as a question of law. oTt of h George swear e n o a r b rgj object ti The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland) thought be was justified in asserting, that if this matter came on upon a writ of error in England, it could not stand for one moment. It was stated in Teesdale's case that at Durham it had been the uniform practice for the foreman of the grand jury to swear the witnesses. The practice was . so stated by Sir Gregory Lewin ; and if it were not justified by the common law, it never could have passed without objection. Before the 56th of the grand juries in Ireland of their finding a bill of in dictmentwllithoUtB7:xamining witnesses for the crown. a practice had prevailed in many of that Bill wars to make it compulsory tmlses . in open court previous to the finding of the bill of indictment. Their Lordships would ob serve that all the pleas in abatement admitted that the witnesses should have been sworn under the Act of 1816 —the Act to empower the foreman of any grand jury in . Ireland to administer oaths to witnesses in Ireland. The Act of 1816 was admitted to extend to every grand jury in Ireland. The mischief to be remedied was, that the informations were laid before the grand jury, and no witnesses were exam i ne d v i va voce , th e o bj ec t g r o b e ing to substitute viva vo ce exam inations for written tes ti m ony; and, as one o f t h e L earne d C ounse l h a d ad verted to the practice in the House of Lords, he sub mitted that the swearing of witnesses whilst the pro ceedings were going on led t o some confusion, and that the oath so administered was n ot so impressive as when adminstered by those who had to receive the testimony. P ers ons sworn in court mi g ht no t b e ex a m in e d f or t wo or three days, and certainly the impressiveness of an oath, might lose its force in that interval, which used to occur before the Act of 1838. That Act was an im portant general remedial m easure . Th e p ream bl e s t a t e d that the practice of swearin g w itn esse s i n c o u rt was at tended with great delay and inconvenience. Since that time, in all the commissions that had been issued, and tried in the Recorder's Court in Dublin, the witnesses we re sworn by the grand jury. How, then, would the case be, if, as represented for the a p pe ll an t s , th e A c t and found the bills charged by the Recorder, did not extend to Commissions in whi c h t h e j u d ges o f the superior courts were incle.ded ? I t f requent l y hap phbweya da n st e hr d i etet t nit hrieeamcdtee,necessary st the ah jury rayt tthh e examinedaht t a awt d lhloet beenjudges h ca me i nto court. Now, witnesses, ew itnesses should be re-sworn in open Court before the Jud g es, a nd the whole of the proceedings gone over again ? Yet, if this objection such would be the case ; and ever y man who s was wrongly transport e d. I t was a cu rious werecmanm good,hiosasdinieen con victed and transp orte d under these coincidence that the first judge who charged a a jury under the Act was B aron W o l fe, whose name was on this bill. Lord CAMPBELL—Had he the Act before him at the time ? The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland) did not know. But he thought that when a judge instructed a jury on the construction of an Act 01 . Parliament, he would have made himself acquainted with that Act. In the In enacting part of the Bill it was enacte d , t h at "I n all cases s for which grand jury, and that th e clerk of the crown at assizes, and the clerk of the peac e at sessi ons, should endorse the names of the witnesses on th e back of the bill. Mr. theirshould con come before the witnesses might be sworn by the fo reman or other members of the : before grand juries in Ireland Kelly laid great stress upon this point. The Right Hon. and Learned Gentleman then proceeded to refer to cases on the subject, in the 2d Instit ute, pages 393, 394, and 426. He did not think it wa s - necessary he should trouble their Lordships with any f urt h er ob servations on the assignment in error, except w i t h respect to Mr. Steele s assignment of error in fact, and that he ventured to say could not be sustained for the reasons he bad already mentioned. He admitted that all the witnesses had been swor n , b ut t h at the off i cer not having put his initials on the bill, th e w h o l e was in valid; now he submitted that it was not. He would now shortly call the attention of their Lordships to the in dictment in the present case. He thought he bad some grounds to complain of some of the Learned C ounse l w h o appeared on behalf of th e plaintiffs in error, one of them having adverted to matters that were not within the I record. Whoever had instructed the Learned Counsel to make the statement he did had instructed him to state that which was not true. Having said thus much he would proceed with his arguments notwithstanding the language that had been used by one of the Counsel for the plaintiffs in error, who in speaking of the vituperative language of some parts of the indictment, seemed to hare made use of it himself, because he said that nothing but confidence in a political jury could have induced this indictment to be framed as it had been. Nothing in his opinion could have justified counsel in making such observations. The fifth count of the ; indictment appeared to be the first to which an objcption had been made, and the reason probably there was no allusion made to the earlier counts was! that the fifth and subsequent counts were embodied in a different way. By the fifth count the defendants were found guilty of unlawfully and maliciously conspir ing to create discontent and 'disaffection among the sub jects of the Queen and to the Government. Now the first case on the subject was the case of the King v. Redhead Yorke," reported in the State Trials. The', Right Hon. and Learned Gentleman then quoted from the 9th volume of Carrington and Payne's Reports, page 275, the case of the " Queen v.'Vincent." Vincent had been one of the associates of Frost, who had been found guilty of high treason. Frost had not been tried upon the indictment for conspiracy, but Vincent had been tried. The first count on which he had been in dicted charged him with conspiring to excite discontent and 'disaffection amongst the liege subjects of her Ma jesty against the Constitution, and of endeavouring by assembling a large number of persona to excite peril and alarm in the mind of her Majesty's liege subjects, and by exciting such peril and alarm to procure a change in the Constitution. In that case the j ury had found Vincent guilty. He had procured a copy of the indictment from the so licitor of the Treasury. The indictment had been tried on the 26th of March, 1840, and the indictments in that case were identical with the present. One of the Learned Counsel who had addressed them on the present occasion for the plaintiffs in error, and who had par ticularly directed their Lordships' attention to that count in the indictment, had been one of the counsel for the Crown when Vincent was tried. But what was discontent and disaffection in 1840, when the Learned Gentleman was in office, be came legitimate opposition in 1844. However, the case of the " Queen v. Vincent" was a precedent for them. The case of the " King v. Hunt" furnished a similar precedent; and there was another precedent in the case of Law v. Allan," reported in the 2d Lynch, page 796. That was a precedent for an indictment for general conspiracy. In that indictment it was al leged that Law had conspired to seduce men from their allegiance, without stating when or by what means. The Learned Gentleman then quoted the case of the " King v. De Berenger," as a precedent for the present indictment. The same observations applied to the 6th and , 7th counts of the indictment. The Learned Gentle man on the other side had put the case of a mob who met to intimidate another mob which sought to procure changes in the law and in the Constitution. But a mob meeting for this purpose was not a mob meeting for the purpose of producing changes in the law by intimidation and the demonstration of physical force. Lord BROUGHAM—That would not be an answer to the case put by Mr. Kelly. He put the case of an Orange mob coming down to intimidate the Houses of Parliament, and then he supposed a loyal mob coming down and saying that they would prevent the Orange mob from intimidating the Houses of Parliament, in order that the Act of Emancipation, or any other Act, might be passed. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland)—That would be a mob going down to intimidate the Orange mob, but it would not be a mob met for the purpose of procuring changes in the Constitution. Lord BROUGHAM—Yes, it would, for they came down to intimidate the - Orange mob, in order to procure the Emancipation Act. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland) apprehended that a mob coming down to free Parliament from the pressure of another mob, would not be a mob convened to procure alteration and changes in the Constitution. The LORD CHANCELLOR—But would it be a mob unlawfully, maliciously, and seditiously convened? Lord BROUGHAM—Aye, aye, that is another question. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland)—When their Lordships came to examine the count they would find it did not apply to such meetings. There was nothing dissimilar in it from the count in the case of Feargus O'Connor, which had been tried before Mr. Baron Rolfe, in which the judgment was arrested on the count in which he was found guilty, because the count was with out a venue. _ _ Lord DENMAN said there were two counts in that case on which the defendant was convicted. One of those counts they considered too general, but they gave no judgment, as the party was not brought up for judg ment. They also thought that the venue count was not good. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland)—The Learned Gentleman on the other side alluded to the words, the demonstration of great physical force, and said, that they meant nothing. He would refer their Lordships, on this point, to the language used by Lord Chief Justice Tindal. He then read the judgment of Chief Justice Tindal, and proceeded to. say, that though the large meetings might be for a more innocent purpose than high treason, yet the holding those meetings certainly amounted to an aggravated misdemeanour, as it was impossible to say to what consequences they might not lead. It had been alleged as an objection to this count, that it was not stated who were the parties who were to be in timidated ; but he contended that this was not necessary ; in the case of a conspiracy to defraud generally, it was not necessary to state who were to be defrauded. He next proceeded to the counts which charged a conspiracy to bring the tribunals of the country into hatred and contempt. He could con ceive no more grave offence than thus endeavouring to bring the administration of justice into disrepute. In the case of the riot at the theatre in Dublin, in which . _ a bottle was thrown at Lord Wellesley, it was decided that though the parties had a right to express their ap probation, yet what was right in the individual, was illegal when there was a pre-combination for that pur pose. In the case of the officers in the East India Company's service, reported in 4th Burrow, the parties were all indicted for a conspiracy. Lord Mans field held that, although each individual had a right to say " I will throw up my commission because batty has been refused," yet an agreement to that effect constituted a conspiracy. The Learned Counsel then went on to show that the indietnients in these cases were similar to the count for endeavouring to procure a change in the law by a demonstration of phy sical force. and read the count for that purpose. His Learned Friend had so ably argued that part of the case that he would not trouble their Lordships by ar guing it at greater length. As to the extreme cases which had been put by the other side, such as the con spiring to steal a loaf of bread on one day, and conspiring to fire a house on the next, he would only say, that no judge would allow two such offences to be in cluded under one conspiracy. As to the ques tion of good and bad counts, there was no analogy in civil and criminal cases. In civil cases there could be a venire de novo ; but that could not apply to criminal cases. The court of assize could not make up its record with such a distinction between good and bad counts. They could not enter up a judgment non obstante vere dicto ; neither could they enter a verdict of acquittal. It was no matter how many counts there were in the in dictment, the question was whether the party was guilty of the offence charged in the indictment, and was there a finding to warrant the judgment ? If the arguments on the other side were to prevail, it would strike at the full scope of criminal justice. He trusted their Lordships would not come to any conclusion that would do anything to alter the whole mode in which the criminal business of the country was transacted. There was another point to which he would slightly ad vert, and that was the point raised upon the first count of • the indictment. It was not necessary that they should all be pronounced guilty, there was nothing inconsistent in saying that some might be guilty of the whole and some in part, and if that was without the issue it puts an end to the objection. As to the dis continuance point their Lordships had received no answer of any entries that had been made in accordance with the ancient custom. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that if the Hon. Gentle man the Attorney-General for Ireland had any point on which he wished to remark, their Lordships would hear it when they re-assembled in an hour and a half. The further hearing was then adjourned till half ' past six. Their Lordships then re-assembled at a few minutes after seven o'clock. The ATTORNEY- GENERAL (for Ireland) resumed. He then proceeded to cite authorities in support of the pro position which he had laid down previous to the adjourn ment, and also re-stated his argument in reference to repugnancy. On these grounds he submitted that suf ficient cause had not been shown for reversing the judg ment of the Court of Queen's Bench in Ireland. The Learned Counsel closed the case for the Crown at half-past seven. Sir T. WILDE, before proceeding to address their Lordships apologised for not appearing in his wig, re questing that he might be excused from wearing it on the ground that it produced headache. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, himself and the Learned Judges felt the same inconvenience. This permission must not be taken as a precedent, and what the Learned Counsel curtailed in the wig was not to be added to the argument.—(Laughter.) Sir T. WILDE then proceeded with his reply on behalf of the defendants. He said, some of his Learned Friends on the opposite side had remarked upon the State trials and the circumstances which had attended some of them., He could not help thinking, that if the present judgmbnt were affirmed, it must be referred to a period two hundred years back. The indictment charged the defendants with certain political conspiracies in terms as generAl as any which could be found. The charge was one which might be made at almost any time against a political opponent. It was spread over nine or ten counts, supported by the speeches of diffe- rent persons, and the contents of newspapers. A charge of that nature could at any time be brought against a political opponent. But not only was this case brought forward in a form suited to the worst of times and the worst of places, but if their Lordships yielded to the arguments on the other side, the challenge of the jury was entirely gone in Ireland. His Learned Friends, who appeared on behalf of the Crown, had supported their case by more positive assertions than he had ever before heard in a case of that nature. Every difficulty was removed by a statement that so and so was the settled practice, the constant usage, and this statement was accompanied by an absolute inability to produce a single precedent. Ile had before stated, that this was the first case in which counts so generally framed had been brought before the House of Lords. It was im possible to produce an instance irrwhich the court had ever given judgment upon an entire record, without ex amining what counts were good. The judgment was always entered upon a good count, and the difficulty in doing so was altogether ima ginary on the part of his Learned Friends. Cases in point had recently occurred. Now, his Learned Friends had first to meet the general charge that this indictment did not contain, at least in some of its counts, a suffi ciently distinct legal charge. He was free to admit, that acts which individuals might innocently do separately were made criminal by combination. Such was the case where the agreement was calculated to oppress a par ticular person. If the officers of the East •India Com pany entered into a confederacy to embarrass and injure the Company by all resigning at one time, he admitted that though each might lawfully have resigned •at his discretion, a confederacy to resign m ould be illegal. So also he admitted that if a certain number of persons combined not to deal with a particular tradesman, that would be an offence in law. He would not ask the Counsel for the Crown to say, whether there was any such conspiracy in these counts. It had been said that there were cer tain articles in a literary work which were calculated to disturb the public peace. He admitted that there were several matters charged which might tend to disturb the public peace. But he asked, were these rightly charged in the indictment, or rightly found in the verdict ? Take the count which charged with conspiring to stir up hatred and jealousy between the subjects of the Crown, and dissatisfaction and hatred towards the Government. What could be more general than this ? every Opposition to the Government was accused by those in power of the same offence. But how was a man to know of what he was accused under a count like this? If this could hold good, any man taking part in politics might be entangled—no man could be safe from the charge of conspiracy. Looking at the nature of the evidence by which such charges were sup ported, their Lordships were to look to the terms in which thd charge was stated in the indictment, and whether it was: enough to enable the accused to know what he was called on to answer. There was scarcely any political discussion that would not be liable to the same imputation of stirring up hatred and ill-will between dif ferent classes of her Majesty's subjects. Why should it be made a matter of conspiracy for men - to join in endeavouring to obtain a repeal of the Act of Union or of any other Act ? He hoped that these words were too vague to be tolerated by their Lordships. Now with respect to the meetings to intimidate—Mr. Justice Burton stated that they were the more dangerous be cause they were so peaceable. They were as quiet as Quakers, and quite as dangerous. The only object of those meetings was to show the concurrence of mind of great numbers in one common object. It was ad mitted that there was no alarm, no intimidation? Had not those persons a right to ask what is the intimidation with which you charge us ? There were no arms, no violence, no dis order, no intimidation. But was it a legal charge to say that men conspired to intimidate, when they took every precaution that there should be no intimidation? He submitted that this charge was so vague that no subject of a free country ought to be put upon his trial for it. The callirig of large meetings to show the extent of public opinion on the corn-laws, the Reform Bill, or any other, was not liable to such a charge. He thus dis posed of the sixth count. The seventh count charged them with conspiring to effect the repeal of the union by a great demonstration of physical force. That demon stration was to be found in the large meetings, which gave none of the alarm which intimidation implied. It did not even shake the nerves of the Government. The object—the avowed object of those who called the meetings—was to demonstrate what numbers were de sirous of the repeal, and that object was perfectly legal. It was not asserted in the indictment that the -object was illegal. The next count (the eighth) was that they , conspired to set aside the authority of the courts of law in Ireland. How had the defendants done this? They bad done no more to bring the courts of law into contempt, or to set aside their authority, than to recommend arbi tration, instead of an appeal to the expensive and un certain law courts. But he would admit that such legal object might be sought by illegal means. But then you should show the illegal means—you should prove that they were resorted to, or were intended to be resorted to. It was quite competent to any man, or body of men, to point out the inefficiency of the existing courts, and to suggest a substitute for them. That might be done in unbecoming language, and in an illegal manner, but no such thing was charged in this count. The next count charged the defendants with conspiring to assume and usurp the prerogative of the Crown, in the establish ment of courts for the administration of the law. All that he would say of that clause was, that it was so vague and general, that it was unnecessary for him to occupy their Lordships by one word more than calling their attention to it. He submitted that these counts were substantially bad. He owned that he had heard with surprise the Learned Attorney-General for Ireland say that their Lordships were to take their law from the Courts below. He had always thought that the Courts below were to take their law from their Lordships. When a course of proceeding has arisen in the courts below, and which came before their Lordships, it was new to him to hear that their Lordships were to take heir law from the courts below. Considerable looseness had been allowed to creep into indictments for con spiracy of a private nature ; it was now sought to allow it to creep into indictments for political conspiracies. This might lead to very serious consequences. There was extreme danger in allowing a loose practice to creep into a law under the idea that it must be correct, because it had not been appealed from, when they must recollect the enormous expense parties were put to before they could obtain the benefit of their Lordships' opinion—a great luxury, he admitted, when they did g et it, but a very high priced one, and out of the reach of those who could not afford to spend hundreds of pounds to obtain it. He then called their attention to the third count. His Learned Friends had stated that if the indictments were not gene ral it would lead to many criminals escaping. But he referred them, for the very form of the process of setting, aside a verdict, to Hales Pleas of the Crown, ch. 29, in the case of Van; who was indicted for murder, pre• cured the first verdict to be set aside, was tried de novo, and was hanged. Lord Hale considering that it was a hard case, as he ought to have been able to plead his former trial. In this case would be found the regu lar forms of the judgment and the discharge of the pri soner, by reason of the defect in the indictment. The jury is bound to decide upon every point of the indict ment, and if they found the accused guilty of only one part, they were bound to acquit him of the rest. With respect to the third count, what was the meaning of the finding? Nothing could be more precise or distinct than this, that the finding convicted the defendants on all the matters charged against them on the premises, and not only of the whole matter, but in the manner and form in which the ;premises were charged. The matter charged was a conspiracy with a certain number of persons. But an acquittal of A for conspiracy with B, did not prevent A from being afterwards indicted for conspiring with C, D, E, or F, or any num ber of letters. And here Mr. O'Connell, Mr. Barrett, and Mr. Duffy were found guilty of conspiring with Mr. J. O'Connell, Mr. Steele, Mr. Ray, Mr. Gray, and Mr. Tierney. Now if Ais acquitted on a charge of conspir ing with B, they must acquit B of conspiring with A; one man could not be guilty of conspiring with himself. So if Mr. D. O'Connell, Mr. Barrett, and Mr. Duffy are charged with conspiring with Mr. Steele, Mr. Ray, Mr. Gray, and Mr. Tierney, and these last are acquitted of conspiring with the former, that finding negatives the verdict of guilty against Mr. D. O'Connell, Mr. Barrett, and Mr. Duffy ; the record showed the finding to be re pugnant. The subject of the challenge was a fearful point. It was a fearful point to hear his Learned Friend say that the Act of Parliament had taken away the right of challenge to the array. The LORD CHANCELLOR—It does not take away the right. Sir T. WILDE said it did not, but he bad understood his Learned Friend to say so. However, he would not further discuss it, although the argument went a long way to take it away. The Attorney-General had read the challenge in a curious way. He had read certain parts, and then commented upon them so long that their Lordships had lost the connexion between the parts which he had read and the parts which followed. Si r W. Follett had said that the Recorder could not adjudi cate upon the jury list, but he had altogether omitted to state that the Recorder had to adjudicate upon the quali fications of the persons who are to be placed upon that list; so that he had, in fact, to adjudicate upon the list. Having made the list, that list was delivered over to form the jurors' book, and from that jurors' book the panel was arranged, so that the Recorder did, in fact, select those persons who were to serve on the special jury. The Recorders' list was the foundation of the jury book—the jury book was the foundation of the jury list. Now the challenge averred that the Recorder did not make out and deliver his list according to the terms of the statute, and he ap prehended that the challengers had done their duty in se stating. The Attorney -General complained that the challenger did not go on to aver that he had delivered another list furnished him by some person unknown. It averred, however, that the list had been fraudulently made to the prejudice of the defendants. His Learned Friends on the other side had endeavoured to keep that MADE TO MEASURE. Tweed coats, trimmed with silk, made in any shape, water proofed from 0 18 Cashmere, fine Saxony, and other light summer materials, made in the first style of fashion from 1 5 0 Figured quilting vests, 7s. each, or three for Cashmere vests, in recherche patterns from 0 9 6 Summer Trousers, in great variety of materials 0 16 0 Single milled Victoria, and plain doe trousers Best quality West if England 1 2 0 Dress Coats • from 1 12 11 Best manufactured 2 15 0 Mourning to any extent ca be had at five minutes' notice, at the following prices : Men's Suits, dress coat, vest, and trousers from 1 1 6 0 Boys' ditto, jacket, vest, and trousers from 0 18 0 Inroirrairr.— Any article purchased or ordered, if not approved ef ,exchanged, or the money returned. Observe—E. MOSES and SON, Tailors, Wholesale and Retail Woolen Drapers, Outfitters, and General lareh ouseines, 154, Mi nories„ and 86. Aldgate,City, opposite the Church. Cm:rim—E. Moses and Son are obliged to guard th Ppublic against imposition, having learned that the untradesmanlike falsehood of being connected with them, or it's the same concern, has awn resorted to in many instances, and for obvious reasons. They have no connexion whatever with any other establishment, and those who desire genuine Cheap Clothing should (to plevent disappointment, &c.) call or send to, 154, Minories, or S 6, Aldgate, opposite the Church. N.B. No business transacted at this Establishment from sunset on Frkiay till sunset on Saturday, when business is resumed till twelve o'clock. Admission, Is.; Schools, Half-price. THE GERMAN DWARF FAMILY. (Under the Patronage of the King of Saxony.) EGYPTIAN HALL, PICCADILLY. This extraordinary LILLIPUTIAN FAMILY, consisting of two Brothers and a Sister, having astonished all the Continent by their celebrated Pantomimic Ballets of Action, are exhibiting daily at the Egyptian Hall, Piccadilly, in a Miniature Theatre, constructed for the purpose of their performances. Open from Eleven to Two, and from Three to Eight. Admission, One Shilling. CITY TAVERN, COMMERCIAL HOUSE, Centre of the Market-place, DURHAM, (Within a minute's walk of the Post-office, Banks, and principal Places of Business). J. H. VEITCH, the present Proprietor of the above old and well known Establishment, respectfully invites the support of Commercial Gentlemen travelling in the North of England, in consulting whose accommodation no exertion will be spared. The City Tavern was, for many years, the chief place of resort o the members of that body visiting Durham ' • and the house has been recently fitted up in a way to render it worthy of a renewal of the patronage it formerly enjoyed. The Commercial Room is commo dious and delightful (commanding a beautiful view of the scenery en the banks of the Wear) ; and the Sleeping Apartments will be found - satisfactorily to combine the requisites of cleanliness and comfort. Prime home-brewed Ales ; London Porter ; choice Spirits ; and excellent Wines. *.* Convenient Stabling and an extensive Coach-house. N.B. An Omnibus to and from the Railvvity Station. - RIDING HABlTS.—Ladies are invited to in spect those made by Messrs. NICOLL, Habit-makers to the Queen and most of the Ladies of the Court. . Cards may be had at 114, Regent-street, London. Messrs. Nicoll offer moderate prices, as a further indacentent to a correct fitting habit, WATCHES, CHRONOMETERS, AND CLOCKS. MR. HARRIS, Chronometer Maker to the Honourable East India Company nearly fifty-years. Hatton and Harris, of Cornhill, having retired from business, Mr. R. WEBSTER will SELL the REMAINDER of his superior and exten sive STOCK, at Mr. Harris's late residence, 76, Cornhill, considerably below the original manufacturing cost. The stock, which has been added to by the introduction of a few articles by the most approSed makers in London, consists of forty new and second-hand marine chronometers, gold and silver pocket chronometers, marine and pediment barometers, duplex and lever watches, in gold and silver cases, superior small fiat horizontal gold and silver watches for ladies and youths, worthy of attention from the low prices, two regulators, musical, quarter, and balance clocks for carriages, time-piece dials for counting-houses and kitchens, several ornamental drawing-room clocks, at very low prices. Purchasers will be referred for attention and regulation to one of the oldest houses in London, whose guarantee will be given for the correctness of performance and superior manu facture of the work. The premises being let, the stock must shortly be removed.—Apply, late Harris, 76, Cornhill. PRESERVES AND CONFECTIONERY. The superiority of BETTS'S PATENT BRANDY, for Pre serves and Confectionery, is testified by the fact that it is preferred to any other spirit by the most extensive Wholesale Confectioners in the Metropolis ; for fortifying home-made wines it is invaluable ; as an ordinary beverage it is congenial to the most delicate constitutions; and, as a medical stimulant, it is peculiarly adapted to persons of bilious or dyspeptic habits. Quantities of not less than Two Gallons, supplied at the Distillery, 7. Smithfield-bars, in Stone Jars, at 18s. per Gallon, exclusive of the price of the Jar; and in Glass Bottles, at 20s. per Gallon, Bottles and Case included. Consumers of Brandy arc respectfully informed that J. T. BETTS, Jun., and Co., will not be responsible for any Bottled Brandy that is not protected against fraudulent substitution, by the Patent Metallic Capsules, made of pure and solid metal (not tin-foil), embossed with the words " Betts's Patent Brandy, 7, Smithfield-bars," to which at tention is especially directed. 17, CORNHILL, FEn. 1, 1844. TO SCHOOLS. RELFE and FLETCHER'S HAIR-LINE POINTED PENS. R. and F. beg respectfully to direct the attention of the Scholastic Profession to their recently-invented HAIR-LINE POINTED PENS. These Pens, in the manufacture of which great care has been bestowed, are produced under the superintendence of Messrs. R. and F., and are presumed to surpass any Steel Pen yet offered to the public. The points are so fine, that the up-stroke is hardly per ceptible, while the metal is of that flexible nature, and the whole finish so perfect, that a clear down-stroke is insured. The Hair line Pointed Pens are divided Into three classes, Broad, Medium, and Fine Points, and in ordering them, care will be necessary that they are distinctly named. They are sold in Boxes of a Gross each at 55., or One Dozen, mounted on a Card with a neat holder, at is. PUBLICATIONS. This any is published, in one vol. lsato., neatly bound In cloth, price Is. 6d., AFORMULARY of DEVOTION for the USE of SCHOOLS, after the manner of the Book of Common Prayer, composed chiefly in the language of Scripture, and arranged for each day of the week. By the Rev. J. T. DOBNEY. Relfe and Fletcher, 17, Cornhill This day is published, in one vol. lBmo., price 35., neatly bound in cloth, and illustrated by 150 diagrams, neatly engraved on Wood, THE ART OF LAND SURVEYING. Ex plained by short and easy rules, particularly adapted for the use of Schools, and so arranged as to be abiousefid to Farmers, Stew ards, and others. By JOHN' QUESTED, Surveyor. Relfe and Fletcher, 17, Cornhill. This day is published, in one vol., neatly bound in cloth, price 25., FIRST GREEK LESSONS. Being a Course of Study so nrianged as to require no previous acquaintance with the Grammar. By CHARLES WHITE, 11/f.A., of Peter House, Cambridge. Relfe and Fletcher, 17, Cornhill. NEW WORKS BY DR. EDWARDS. Published this day, Bvo., 55., cloth, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION; the importance of its Extension in our own Country. With a sketch of the State of Elementary Education on the Continent. By HENRY EDWARDS, PH. D. D.D. Also, 2 fcp. Bvo., 75., cloth, PROVIDENCE; a Poem, vols., in Four Cantos : with Missellaneous Pieces. • London : Longinaii,'Brown, Green, and Longmans. NORTH BRITI,SII REVIEW.—To ADVER TISERS.--,Advextjsinents and bills intended for insertion in No. 11. must be sent to the publishers by the 15th instant. 3,0 00 bills required. Edinburgh: W. P. Kennedy. London: Hamilton, Adams, and Co. Dublin:: W. Curry and Co. GREENLAND FISHERY. PETERHEAD, JULY 4.—The Mary, arrived here from Greenland, left the ice 27th ultimo, reports the Jean, of Peterhead, with 700 seals ; Constantia, of Hull, with 2,100 seals ; Anna, of Hull, 1,800 seals ; Hebe, of Hull, 500 seals. G,t, - C -, 0 21P' important fact out of their Lord s hips might - /They went over the matter, indulging in minute criticisms, but al together kept out of sight the important averment that the list had been fraudulently made. Now, this was a great political trial ; the defendant alleged that the jury book had been fraudulently made up. The returning officer was their well known political opponent. The LORD CHANCELLOR—It does not appear on the record. ` , ...._,-..0 . Lord CAMPBELL—Let us confine ourselves to the re cord, for God's sake. The LORD CHANCELLOR—More particularly in the - reply. You may suppose a case of a list made by a political opponent. Sir T. WILDE would beseech their Lordships to re member that this was a case of political prosecution, which many would be inclined to call persecution. The indictment was for acts extending over 0, large space of time and place, so as to giro the prosecutors the: power of laying the venue almost where they pleased. In such a prosecution, above all others, it was necessary to the pure administration of justice, that there should be no taint of fraud upon the composition of the jury. The Attorney-General for Ireland asked what the defendants would propose to have done. He should be inclined to think that it was the business of the Officers of the Crown to find 4 remedy. They were bound to.drop the prosecution if they could not try the men fairly. His Learned Friend the At torney-General said they could only have the challenge when the fault was in the sheriff. Formerly the sheriff was the only person who had to do with the jury. Lord CAMPBELL—The common law assumes that the *sheriff himself summoned the jury. Sir THOMAS WILDE—Such was the case, and there fore the sheriff was the only person who could be chal lenged for an indifference. But now the law divided those duties, and were all the amendments of the law to end in the destruction of those means which the sub ject formerly had of protecting him against paeksd juries ? The question was, whether, now that the law had divided the duty amongst other persons, the remedy did not follow the altered means by which the evil was produced ? The sheriff might be morally free from blame, but he was legally to blame for having made his list from a book imperfectly made up. It was his duty to make up his list from a proper book, or, if he had used an improper and fraudulent book for 1844, then he should go to ,the book of 1843. That point went to the root of the administration of justice. The Counsel for the Crown were under a mistake in suppos ing that because the list was not good in this case, it might not be good in others. There was fraud as re garded them, but others might not be injured. These defendants averred in their challenge that this fraud had been perpetrated to their prejudice, and this objec tion was good in their mouths, though it might not be good in the mouths of others. He would not touch upon the points which had been so ably argued by his friend Mr. Peacock ; and he trusted that, by their Lordships' decision on ths point of the challenge of the array, the law would be secured for the future against any such abuse as had occurred—that the administration of jus tice would be freed from this stain—and he, therefore, prayed their Lordships that this judgment be reversed. Mr. HILL would limit his reply to the validity of the challenge, and he would proceed at once, without any preliminary observations. His Learned Friend, the Attorney-General for England, had passed over one or two points which were of the very deepest importance. It had been said by the Attorney-General that there was nothing to show that the list had been made by the Recorder. Now, it appeared that a fraudulent paper writing had been made the basis of the Recorder's list, which had been made the basis of the jury book, which had been made the basis of the special jury list. So that there was a distinct allegation, showing that the special jury list had been made up from a book made up from that fraudulent writing. The only material question in the case was wanting, namely, the fact whether the special jury was selected from the list the Recorder sent in. It was distinctly averred upon the challenge that a fraud was committed in putting in the book from which the jury was selected. The LORD CHANCELLOR—But did not that give the right to challenge the array? Mr. HILL submitted it did. Lord CAMPBELL doubted whether they had any right to challenge at all, and whether their proper course would not have been to have moved the Court of Queen's Benet' to quash the panel. Mr. HILL said they objected to the panel, but the Court of Queen's Bench decided they had no jurisdic tion. The challenge to the array and the poll corrected any misfeasance in putting the jury into the box. If the Jury Act was subject to the construction of his Learned Friends, it would operate as a curse instead of a ,bless ing to Ireland. He should say. in the present case, the best 'course to have adopted would have been to direct the award to the coroner. The LORD CHANCELLOR —Why should it go to the coroner? Was there any default in the coroner ? Mr. HILL observed that the duties of the sheriffs had been subdivided by the Act. The Learned Counsel then proceeded, at some length, to contend that the panel was bad.' The Recorder had been commanded to do one thing, and lie had done another. Until he had performed the duty cast upon him of making out the list, and send ing it to the clerk of the peace, how was he fanctus officio? It appeared to him that no inconvenience arising from the mistake or fraud in making out the list was to be put in comparison with the evils which would arise from having a jury formed from an improper list. If the re corder had not done his duty, or if the clerk of the peace had not done his duty, they were in the same situation as if they had not time to make out a good list, and there was no reason why it should not be referred back to them to make a good list. It had been said that the object of this Act of Parliament was to take away in a great deg see the right of challenge to the array. I le did not see how that could be contended for, when his Learned Friends argued that the 35th and 36th sections provided for the insertion of those names which were fraudulently omitted. But those related to the juror himself, as lie felt himself aggrieved by not having his name inserted in the la but it did not apply to persbns in the situation of the defendants. He would conclude the observations he was about to make by observing that the ground of remedy must be separated from a particular case, and he called upon their Lordships not to decide this point upon an extreme case, and not to look upon it as if only one single name had, been omitted or misarranged, as their Learned Friends upon the other side called upon them to do ; but if they were to decide it upon an extreme case they ought, he contended, to take the opposite extreme, and to decide it as if a multitude of names had been struck out. He begged of their Lordships to consider what dangers might accrue if they pronounced that there was no remedy by challenge which might be brought before that august tribunal ; and if he wanted an illustration of that it would best be found in the case now before their Lordships, for here was a case of the utmost importance, which divided the whole empire, in which it was impossible to obtain a jury without some degree of bias, and in which it was therefore necessary that every safeguard which the law provided should be put in requisition. Their Lordships would recollect that this book was made up after this case had originated by the finding of the jury. He trusted their Lordships would find the means of accommodating great principles to the machinery by which they were to be,wrought, or rather to accommodate the machinery to those great principles which set it in motion. With those obserVa tions he would leave the case in their Lordships' hands. Their Lordships having called on Mr. Kelly, Mr. KELLY rose and asked if their Lordships would insist on his going on at that late hour of the night, The LORD CHANCELLOR having ' stated that they would hear him till eleven o'clock, Mr. KELLY said he should feel it his duty to compress into the shortest space the observations he had to make. He would first advert to the important public question now before their Lordships, whether upon one general indictment, where different counts were bad, the court of error must not reverse the judgment altogether ; and he must say he heard no sound reason in any war tending to support the opposite case. In the case of an indictment for seveeal misdemeanours, if their Lordships decided that some of the counts containing distinct charges, upon which one judgment was pronounced, were bad, and that a court of error could not reverse such a judgment, they would decide that which he submitted was clearly opposed to•all principles of law and justice. And he begged to remark that there was no fear of that taking place which the Learned Counsel on the other side contended would take place, namely, that great offenders would escape with impunity. Where a judgment was reversed on the grounds he had stated, there was nothing to prevent the accused from being • tried over again, so that he was surprised his Learned Friends put forward this as a ground why their Lord ships should not reverse the judgment on this ground. He submitted, that there was not even a dictum to support the proposition of his Learned Friend. None of the dicta cited referred to a court of error ; a court of error was not even named. The mode in which this case had been met was, by saying, that a court of error could not revise a judgment in misdemeanor where one count was good. He had looked in vain for au thorities to support that view. Upon motions in . arrest of judgment all the cases went to show that if there was one good count the court . would not arrest the judgment. But the reason was, that they were in the position of a jury, and could there fore apportion the damages. The question was never - referred to in a court of error. Lord Mansfield said, " We can lessen the punishment on accopnt of the bad counts," and this was the whole extent of authority to be found either in civil or criminal cases upon motions in arrest of judgment. The peat and important proposition then before their Lord ships with regard to a writ of error had never been argued. In opening this case on behalf of those for whom he appeared, he had admitted that the rule in civil cases was different from that in criminal cases; but the question was, not whether such might or might not have been the impression of any man, but what was the law of England, founded on principle and consistent with authority, on this point ? In the course of the argument, by both his Learned Friends approached the only question which was before their Lordships; in ' stead of meeting the arguments of his Learned Friends, they went oil to argue as to the effect of such appeal in cases of larceny or common misdemeanour or murder. But it was vain to place this case upon the same ground. He and his friends on the same side had s been accused of putting hypotheticallsy extreme cases. They had not, however, gone so far in hypothetioal cases as his . Learned Friends on the other side had gone. There could be no doubt that, in all criminal cases, it was admitted that no man could be accused of two distinct crimes in one indictment. The Learned Gentleman was proceeding to cite some more cases, when The LORD CHANCELLOR said—Have you nearly finished this head, Mr. Kelly ? Mr. KELLY said he had still a few observations to make. The LORD CHANCELLOR—Then we will hear them to morrow, at ten o'clock.: Their Lordships then adjourned. ---- LOAN. aIN N EY, amounting to 89 , 4501., is about to be Ca r i sr . distributed in the ROYAL BADEN LOAN, to be drawn at 35,erbu11,,,e, guaranteed bv th Government. There are prizes of kits 11 1 11 " 10 ' ° . ,_° 0 , 5 ,002, 3,000 . , &c., the lowest 65, and will be paid in Ak w l'eY'• Tiek e ts, each, 10 for for 10/. Prosctuses ma 11, 4 C (on t r a 2 5/., 22 J. application) of Messrs. A. Stra pe us and Co., rd.d"'o Re ceivers -General, Frankfort or by remitting a Post ,,,9ove,.er to their office 26, Bouverie-street, Fleet-street, London. ice h'"leut lists of the drawing will be sent to each purchaser. ars trona Twelve to Three. Abbrr . 7 , 11 lONAL ROOMS FOR PARTIES. b rough t e perfection to which these temporary Rooms have been kt,,,,.,.._.eserves the attention of all who either have not sufficient hoti4"B7odation, or who wish to prevent the disarrangement of . t uv heir adaboardo paving no poles Inside, being elegantly lined, and wi ma oor, renders them complete. Not the least of the reco ve _ ur " °ll _s,. is the facility with which they are erected and reur ,Zisir,g as it may appear, they are ereelnd even witit the A DDIv noor, with perfect case and safety, when required. FGINGTON, Mquee, Tent, and Rick- nianuf acturer, 2, Duke 'D -street, Southwark ar . qIL±, FRAMES.—FLY SPOTS and Go TARNISH. Id or GiMin D g eteer rgent ..... 25. 6d. per Bottle.. O r Siel or Is 6d. Ditto. u Lacqu Do . Pr hese .roo ze Do .......Ditto. r t t obisig„ c "Vositions are perfectly innoxlous, their effect sudden, r ,7toro r t -- .7 , an lating. Gilding, Lacquer, and Bronze, are instantly tC,, 7, th original lastre, fly spots removed, and covering 'Y rendered unnecessary—sponging the surface the only PAR,„ TN, n ' , IAN SILVER DETERGENT, Is. 6d. per Bottle. liostre.4`olPosition gives to silver and plating a lasting and superb t ! ! 'itati on d€l Polish. It assimilates albata, German silver, and oth . er s of silver so closely to real silver, that they cannot be dm ..ed from it. It is perfectly innoxious easy of application, and 33, 4 0 , 4 e °st• Sold by UPTON and CO., Lamp ' Manufacturers, Sr.e. ge••.-....._anover-square, and 66, Basinghall-street, City.