The Sun. — London, England, 1844-02-03 00:00:00

'y - 1 _ ..----- 1 , . --, :1, . --1 7 .4L-• , . . .. . 1 . . • . ... ~ . . ..0.... '/ . . --.......... • i i... . . • • • ui `\ , iiiii k.: 77:::‘ :•:, 0 :,-;_ vi t;;; ; :ti iir :::- , 4t. ...;... ).4n0,,,,i, • 4)/4' ' l / 4 1rf , :.- t: IN --- %''? IFt.:-' 7,7) 111 - A t . ' P th .4r , -.., • i J f , l'f .- ) •-x• v 1 i - ~ , ,,,,,,40 i ' e / • ...., __41 4f _ it ..,,,,- ..,...., 0: -. , _...._ 0,,,,,.. ~, ..4.:, ~, ~ i ~ ....4 , , . a. - , , 4.,.... . „,„, A •-. „....,..,AD , - , ..< ~.., ~ • 1 •:. 1 -,..._ . _,.., 7 ,..-,‘,,„, , 4. 4; 1,,- _t• 2 , o , Aiti „,„,. _.. < „,,,c, , ,,, 9.,. rl ~_ / -',.. ", ~ '''. '" ~ .,-\- --.,Y . . ' ~ 4,, 031', . ' .4.- .. f) , ... ke_ et ' - ~ , • ,„ri• Vf,,,V , : oil.. ,t...•" , tre ..., , , i , .- ...,_ st 0— / ••, .• L IE ' '", 015r,12.41. \ r _ --e— , • - .„-::!•.-..-,''- , - _.z ..,..„ ~ • No. 16,050. LONDON, SATURDAY 1110 NING STYX, FEBRUARY 3, 1844. PRICE sd. THE SUN is Published EVERY MORNING at FIVE O'CLOCK, in. Time for the EARLY TRAINS and TOWN DELIVERY; a SECOND EDITION (Evening Sun) is Published in Time fur the AFTERNOON TRAINS, and a THIRD EDITION at SEVEN O'CLOCK, fir POST, containing PARLIAMENTARY and all other NEWS in LONDON up to that Hour. ONE CHARGE. ADVERTISEMENTS INSERTED in ALL THE THREE PAPERS, Morning, Noon, and Ni g ht, th er eby insuring a TOWN and COUNTRY CIRCULATION; a PUBLICATIONS. IRELAND. THREE SUPPLEMENTS G R A 7' I S, • • . • G REAT T I N G; TFIT LEAGUE TRFR/IY ettCOVFNT-G IS A I R E DE E N. ( I,lg r Will , t CSL AL WE.LiLi." ..Y...r.i:—.G of til, 1...Nii0.:...',.1 7- 1"1- - . CORN -LAW LEAGUE will be held in the Theatre Royal Covent- i ,,, 1 . 11 ..:,'. ;- :a ' Garden, on THURSDAY EVENING NEXT, the Bth of February - . ,g .• ',:, • * ,',.,-: -',/ , I ;'q The meeting will be addressed by the lion. Charles Pelham Villiers, ii.. , 4f,-. ..•-•r% iZ , ' fr, Esq., M.P.; Richard Cobden, Esq., M.P. ; General Sir De Lacy ' ....-'',"!" ' • i • Evans ; and It. R. R. Moore, Esq. a.--i GEORGE WILSON, Esq., will take the Chair precisely at Seven ........,. .11911 RM _ , .. _ .... . , ~...„ ~,„. , 401 , o'clock. at . Cards of admission to the stage and boxes may be had on appllca i ton, after Monday next, at the Central Offices of the League, No. 67, at , P leet-street. No. 16 050. LONDON 3 3 ieg The Cards of Registered Members of the League will, as heretofore, an admit to the Pit and Galleries of the Theatre. al- ril. EAST INDIA HOUSE, FEBRUARY 2, 1844. • re- THE COURT of DIRECTORS of the EAST THE SUN is Published EVERY MORNING the . INDIA COMPANY, with reference to the RESOLUTION of I a ' the GENERAL COURT of the 17th November last, do hereby give in- Notice, that Printed COPIES of the FURTHER PAPERS which have ate been communicated to the said Court of Directors by the Secret Com- ADVERTISEMENTS IN rs. hilttee, regarding the proceedings in Snide, are now ready for delivery Dui . to the Proprietors at this House. ! of JAMES C. MELVILL, Secretary. ...111. MB, ""''' EASE IN WALKING, [rs. EAST INDIA HOUSE, FEBRUARY 2, 1844. M. WM. BADDELEY, of 130, STRAND, is in- It T HE COURT of DIRECTORS of the EAST , it INDIA COMPANY d o her e by give Notice, duced to give publicity to his much-admired PRE cot be That a SPECIAL GENERAL COURT of the said COMPANY will PARED LEATIfER (so noted for extreme SOFTNESS ion held by adjournment at their House, in Leadenhall-street, on and DURABILITY), in consequence of the patronage he has [rs. WEDNESDAY, the 21st instant, at Eleven o'clock in the Forenoon, received, and the general satisfaction given by him in manu- I Pursuant to the following Resolution, viz. : facturing the above into BOOTS, &c., on his peculiar fitting ere "To the Honourable the CHAIRMAN of the COURT of DIREC- principle of combining elegance with ease. An extensive as- Ire. TORS of the EAST INDIA COMPANY. cis- • " HONOURABLE SIR, sortment of best made articles always ready on sale. Esta- Frs. " IVe the undersigned Proprietors of East India Stock request blished 50 years. that a Special General Court may be convened at the earliest period, No. 130 Strand, corner of Waterloo-bridge, London. ten to take i n t o cons id era ti on the following Resolutions proposed to be ........... let submitted to them : ALBION HOTEL, HASTINGS, SUSSEX. On a " 1. That from the Printed Papers recently laid before the Proprie - T O BE LET, the above well knots n lon on the subject of Sinde, it is the opinion of this Court that the HOTEL, • Proceedings of the Government of India which ended in the dethrone- which is beautifully situated facing the sea, and has an led rnent, exile, and imprisonment of the Ameers, and the seizure of their excellent family connection. Stabling, coach-houses, and tap un- Country and private property, were uncalled for, impolitic, and unjust. adjacent. the "2. That this Court does therefore most earnestly recommend to For particulars apply to Mr. Gardner, 17, Hatton-garden, :out the Court of Directors the immediate adoption of such steps, by repro- London, or to Mrs. Emery, Albion Hotel, Marine Parade, agitation to her Majesty's Government, or otherwise, as may cause all 24, . Practicable reparation to be made for the injustice already committed, Hasti ngs. ,this and enforce the abandonment of a line of policy inconsistent with vole. good faith, and subversive of the interests of the British rule in India. TO COMMERCIAL GENTLEMEN AND OTHERS. futr. " We have the honour to be, THE CATHEDRAL HOTEL and TAVERN, Cher , " Honoura b le Sir, 48, St. Paul's Churchyard, and 50, Old Change, one door from ,put " Your obedient Servants, Cheapside, being most central and cheerfully situate, has superior ac care "J. SULLIVAN, commodation at moderate charges. Soup, Fish, and Joints ready from out: " WILLIAM J. EASTWICK, One to Seven o'clock. Dinner off the joint, Is. Gd. ; with soup, fish, or elk- " JOSEPH HUME, • entrees, &c., 2s. Very choice old Wines and Spirits, and the cele- . n•eY " CHARLES FORBES, brated Punch. Rooms for private parties, Hot and Cold Baths, well- the • " lIARFORD JONES BRYDGES, aired Beds, &c. Reid and Co.'s splendid Stout, and Bass and Co.'s No- " JOHN POYNDER, I'ale India Ale. car " ARTHUR J. LEWIS, ;one • "A. HOGG, SACRED HARMONIC SOCIETY, EXETER " THOMAS MARRIOTT. Ars. "Lo n d on , January, 16, 1844." HALL. On FRIDAY EVENING, February 16, 1844, will be repeated Ived •-._.., _ HANDEL'S ORATORIO, " JEPHTIIA." r. GUILDHALL, LONDON, JAN. 26, 1844. PRI N CIPAL VOCAL PE BPORMERS, any NOTICE is hereby given that the BONDS of Miss Rainforth, Miss Towers, Miss Poole, Mr. Young, Mr. Braham, ,ave all PERSONS having become BANKRUPT or having TAKEN and Mr. H. Phinips. . I , _the BENEFIT of the INSOLVENT ACT since their ADMISSION as The Band and Chorus will consist of abot 'e Five Hundred Performers. si • ROKERS of the CITY of LONDON have thereby become VOID, Tickets, 3s. each ; Reserved Seats, 55., may be had of the principal evi- and that all such persons are disqualified to act until they shall have Musicsellers ; of Mr. Howley, 53, Charing-cross ; Mr. Mitchell, 39, Mr. signed other Bonds with sufficient sureties, and shall have been re- Charing-cross ; and of Mr. Reis, 102, Strl md, opposite Exeter Hall. Java admitted by the Court of Aldermen. THOMAS BREWER, Hon. Sec. es— . Information of persons acting as Brokers without being readmitted ears ls requested, that they may be prosecuted. ROYAL POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTION. the MEREWETHER. , . POPULAR LECTURES daily, abounding in BEAUTIFUL EXPERIMENTS. With the view to anrufs, ; the Visitors, as well as hos e GUILDHALL, LONDON, JAN. 26, 1844. to afford instruction in CHEMISTRY, EXP ERIMENTAL PHILO o the NOTICE is hereby given that the COURT of SOPIIY, and other branches of Science, DS . Ryan, Professor Bach ties a , ALDERMEN have DISCHARGED the undermentioned par- hotraer, Mr. Goddard, and other Lecturers TS .ry their subjects as much )row or, v n the OFFICE or EMPLOYMENT of BROKER of the CITY as possible, and have arranged so that each Lecture shall seldom oc 'DON, viz.:— copy more than half an Hour--a List of which for the week is sus i op- THOMAS DOUGAN. pended in the Hall of Manufactures. The East commences at a Quar -1 05- BENJAMIN MENDES DACOSTA. ter past Twelve. The Apparatus, &c., used: for illustration is of the L. I CHARLES PEARCE CHAPMAN. most elaborate and perfect description, amongst which is ARM ;mY WILLIAM DALRYMPLE DOWSON. STRONG'S HYDRO-ELECTRIC MACHL). a: (which is exhibited or in CHARLES EBSWORTIL daily at Three o'clock, and at Eight in the Evenings), and LONG ,n to JOHN GRIFFITH. BOTTOM'S OPAQUE MICROSCOPE, NEN! ; DISSOLVING VIEWS, WILLIAM ANSON HANN. DIVER and DIVING-BELL, &c. &c. an, I WILLIAM THOMAS HODSOLL. Conductor of the Music, T. War !is, Mus. Doc. right JOHN INMAN.. Admission, Is.; Schools, B alf-price. were , WILLIAM POOLE. a nd FRANCIS WAKEFIELD. CHARLES VARNHAM. P is" THE NEXT DISTRIBUTION of MONEY rig in . JOHN COCKItELL. DIVIDENDS, AUTHORISED and GUARANTEED by • the ALBERT WILLIAM JONES. H i s MAJESTY the EMPEROR of A US'fRIA , contains MONEY DANIEL ALDER. • DIVIDENDS of !aril' JOHN HENRY SAUNDERS'. £5O £6O £7O £3O Ptlng WILLIAM VIRGO. £9O £lOO £ll , O £l2O Ited JOHN HENRY BARLOW. £l5O £ 2 0 0 £4o4i £6OO a. I CHARLES TERRY. £BOO £l,OOO Z 1,500 £5,000 f the JOHN MACDONALD. and £23,000 sturlin g. L OS .. MEREWETHER. DFI kY to ensell Direct for PRO'Sklm' E o c uu r t u in s g w to i g u e , tt i c u r p t art o Z i e l t , 1,r570, WITHOUT ,_ , HEINE BHOTE LEES, at HAMBURGH, • GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY. Or, to HEINE BRoTE ERS, at LUBECK. was 0 1., ; -!1 Notice is hereby given, that the next HALF-YEARLY e tho a ,f.;•, - : , MUT, MEETING of theiI.PROPRIETORS of this COMPANY NATIONAL LOAN FUN D LIFE ASSUR i.dIe held in London, pursuant to the Act of Parliament, at the ANCE SOC lET Si, . t° - TZlfigt°n Station, on THURSDAY NEXT, the 15th instant, at 26, CORNHILL, LO'SDON. Rase , bun Ye , for One o'clock precisely, for the ELECTION of FOUR Capital £5O 0,000. Marl rotation, in the place of the same number who will retire by hard , il x_ion, and for other purposes of business. Empowered by Act . )f Parliament.. At the First Annual Division of Pr ofits in May, 1843, Policies of LS 1 1, , th ...n_ And the said General Meeting will also be MADE SPECIAL, for five years' standing in this Society became entitled to a bonus treet. - ,„. Purpose of considering and authorising the Directors to make ap averaging 55 per cent. on the Premium s paid. w rit- vocation to Parliament, in this present session, to alter and enlarge ' • the *lns- , teth powers of any Act or Acts relating to this Company, or to the Chel- EXAMPLI :S. . . Railtirul and Great assesWetern Union Railway Company, or to the Oxford Annual Bonus Cash Prem. nate.' . , ti_. aY Company, ell as the propriety ofjoining or becoming par- Entry. Policy. Age. Sum. • Bill any other person or persons in applying to Parliament fora No. Prem. Added. Bonus. Reduced. , e a to . , for making a Railway from the Great Western Railway at Pang- which ' . 15 7 1, 1rne to the town of Newbury, or of agreeing with any person or £ £s. ci. £s.d.£ s. d. s. d. 1 the • .., . uses of who shall apply to Parliament for such Bill, as to the ex- 1837 39 59 1,000 67 8 4 132 14 65819 9 819 4 Was ough t te r ms on lease or use of such Railway when. made, upon such cction ... .. ',‘,ta and conditions as may seem proper. Another Bonus will be declare din the present year. a ble . • . -,The Chair will be taken at One o'Clock precisely. IMMEDIATE ANNUITY FOR EVERY HUNDRED POUNDS SUNK. • l 'eb. I- • ......_____, 1844. ' C. RUSSELL, Chairman. BARRINGTON, Deputy; Chairman. Age 40 . Annuity. I Annuity. • £6 5 21Arre 70 £l4 2 2 21are d in the present year. IMMEDIATE Al's - NUITY FOR EVERY HUNDRED POUNDS SUNK. Annuity. Annuity. Age 40. £6 5 2 Age 70 ZI4 2 2 50 7 8 0 75 60 9 14 3 VALUABLE FORFEITED PROPERTY. ESSRS. DEBENHAM and STORR will M garde4 SELL by AUCTION, at their Rooms, King-street, Covent. on WEDNESDAY, February 7th, at Eleven, watches, plate, 14"erY, plated goods, guns, pistols, linen and woollen drapery, f.erY, silk mercerv, elegant shawls, scarfs, and handkerchiefs ; dies' and gentlemen's apparel, table and bed linen, carpets, feather Zas, household furniture, and other effects, pledged in months prior March, 1843, with the following Pawnbrokers, viz. :—Arelibutt, ridge-road, Lambeth ; Barnett, Roebuck-terrace, Dover-road ; Burl- Vi TalwOrth ; Baker (late Lamb), Stanhope-street, Clare-market; o e kett; High Holborn ; Lan-ton, Green-street, Leicester-square ; mss, High-street. Newington Butts; Wharton, Bermondsey-street. May be viewed, and Catalogues had at the Rooms. I P' aENTLEMEN'S superior CLOTHING, at Prices much lower than any respectable house has hitherto „"red the public, where cut and quality, the true test of real eco -4MY, are considered. J• yoars,• ALBERT and CO., TAILORS, 52, KING WILLIAM- STREET, c„ Y, established upwards or 2G ht•lte 2 , mantir _d T Gentlemen to an inspection of an extensive and fashionable STOCK of entirely new articles fbr Gentlemen's and Youths' outer garments, made to order in a superior style, for cash, at prices that Perhaps may not astonish the public, but will prove, by the supe riority of wear, much cheaper than those by which they are too often deluded by perambulating advertisements, pampklets, &c., issued by slopsellers and hosiers, offering their slovenly made up rubbish at prices that would barely pay for the labour of a well-made garment. Every description of the most recent improved Waterproof Coats, in every shape and quality, and garment, made at this Establishment, are executed under the superintendence of the Proprietors, whereby punctuality, a gentlemanly fit, and fair dealing, are ensured. nal . forms, Liveries, &c. 52, King William-street, City FE RaUSON CAMROUX, Sec. ECONOMIC LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY. 34, BRIDGE-STREET, BLAC R.F RIARS, LONDON. Established 1 82:3. Empowered by Act of Parliai vent, 3 William IV. LOWER RATES of PREMIUM the in those of any other Office that entitle the Assured to participate i n the Profits. The Bonus declared in 1834 amount ed upon average to 161. per cent. on the premiums then paid ; ant hi 1839 a second Bonus was declared, amounting on the average to .311 . per cent. on the premiums laid during the preceding five years. Prospectuses and other particulars ins y be obtained at the Office between the hours of Ten and Four, or v ill be forwarded to persons resident in the country on application. CAMPBELL JAME 3 DOWNER, Secretary. HANCOuIi:I6 FLEIBILE—k ;ACK BRITSIIES, No. 83. FLEET-STR. El T. THE Public are respectfu 11:v informed that the Warehouse for the Sale of the at xr :e PATENT BRUSHES is now opened, where the various kinds r.P licable to the patent may be obtained. Also, wholesale and fo r exportation—Hair Brushes, for their penetrating properties and pie as ing action, which are highly recommended, and allowed to be a d.:c 'ided improvement—Clothes Brushes, for their flexibility and cordon pity to the shape in their use, as well as preserving the nap of the fin est cloth—Horse Brushes (truly the groom's friend) ; this brush t. ttat ids unrivalled, it is diffi cult adequately to describe the advante g.es obtained by its .flexibility when in use. The Flesh, Shoe, Stove, at id other Brushes, possess great advantages over the ordinary s tiff backs, for it will be found that all brushes hitherto made wear on at the extremities, leaving little of the middle worn, whereas the P. V TENT FLEXIBLE-BACK BRUSHES wear alike throughout. E.X- TE-NS I - V E SAL E• The SPLENDID STOCK of FANCY JEWELLERY, GOLD and SILVER WATCHES, SILVER PLATED GOODS, T ORTOISESHELL WORKBOXES, and TEA CADDIES, and a licieat variety of other Fancy Articles, are now SELLING OFF, at a ll eavy sacrifice, by Messrs. HORTON and CO., of 36, Ludgate eet, opp os i te Messrs. Everington and Co.'s, in consequence of Mr. 'Llortoll retiring from the retail business. jr is seldom the public have an opportunity like the present of pur i;'±eillg, at little more than one-half to two-thirds the usual charge, v ariety of genuine articles now offered for salecomprising Gen- ThZeres and Ladies' Gold and Silver Watches, of workmanship the IKT,,Wlass of excellence, Gold Neck and Guard Chains, Seals and I'en e i, ? alleY and Mourning Brooches, Rings, Pins, and Ear-rings, plateci C 4 L See, Silver Card Cases, Scent and Snuff Boxes ; also Silver Coi l , 'ea and Coffee Sets, Candlesticks, Cruet Frames, Dish Covers, s ce aDishes, Waiters, Ice Pails, Butter Coolers, Bread Baskets, kp warranted the best Sheffield make ; Table and Dessert Forks , s, Soup Ladles, Grape Scissors, Asparagus Tongs, Nut lZier "eSse F ancynives and Forks in Case, Jet Necklaces, and nay eila'other Articles, all at l a considerable sacrifice. MAGNIFICENT TABLE CLOTHS, five i, Yards long, 15s. each ; Napkins to match, yard square, hil• °°. the dozen; Fish Napkins 2s. 6d. the dozen. The No sty _ tiz°au have their own crests, &e., made to order on any ,e r table cloths pubpie Director; of the National Linen Company, in giving o fr e .%ty to the unprecedented prices at which they are now •eltb ri :B, linen manufactures, beg to apprise families residing : 3 town or country that samples can be forwarded for • v - ten previous to payment. 11 111: . ; thlie s Who are curios damask table linen are respect ful.; 4 . 4 ited to inspect a SERB STOCK of this manufac tittaCt'sitting of emblematical and novel designs in the ric h e st • hi ti S n • ;Veil', families, and the trade can purchase every descrip uounlll* linens, sh e etings, table cloths, long cloths, calicos, „,toe.l l -- Put , els, dimities, &c., and other manufactures, suitable ratle,,,nold purposes, at the NATIONAL LINEN COM trlipL,l° BRANCH ESTABLISHMENT, 105, FLEET 4at .corner of Farringdon-street, on tics same terms R.." 8 Factory. Maples au nt to any part of town or country. era to , contain either a remittance or a reference. tuld I, I P o e quates, containing full particulars of the goods for sale, Itre e i -4 of prices, can be had at the Warehouse, 105, Fleet- AL 4 J ,SE' S SCORBUTIC DROPS, , DECLARATION OF THE GUARDIANS OF BRENI, )ti e t DEVON. this „,.;"e Undersigned, solemnly declare that before Thom as Ito °Ur parishioners, commenced taking " Hal it e 's Scor llorQ.'4l4lB," he was literally covered with large running woun d s them 1- of them so large that a person might have laid his fist in th w a y t r b e e s i to or r e ed h t e o had finished the first bottle he noticed an -"ernent and that by continuing them for some time, he got health, after everything else had failed. He aitztiti_til.t.,edrcpv.a:r.lous surto of medicines before tak Halse's and - and had prescriptions from the most ` oelebrated phy. iiaeoLlbtt:tiine this country, without deriving the least benefit. " Ealse's Drops" have completely cured him, and he is now ens ott7er attend to his labour as well as any man in our parish. From . Scam •• cures also made in this part, we strongly recommend " Haim s s . tic Drop," to the notice of the public. by John Elli o t t , sen., L or d o f t h e M anor , J o h n Manning, jul_stu Pearce, Henry Goodman, Arthur Langworthy. wr 2 1, 1843. gr eet ° lei sale Agents for London : Barclay nd Son, Farringdon -33 Lanett, 83 High Holborn; ?rout, a 229, Strand ; King, ktriare-niad ; and Johnston, 68, Cornhill. bottl e ' 8 e lure to, ask for " Halse's Scorbutic Drops," 2s. 9d. per ./ 14 , ,had, in a se a l e d enve lope, price 2s. 6d. ; and sent free, on 4. receiving a Post - office order for Three Shillings, 0 DI I A; 4 d hies i„ 4 I) 9p9lat Treatise on a most important section of Medical yrnßelation to WOMAN ; in which peculiar circumstances ttlitjt ‘ kattiles are considered • together with the causes of DE. atA fERNITY. 111'ustrated by Cases. By GOsS and sailer NY Surgeons 7, Lancaster-place, near Waterloo - bridge, , vnuon. Quo fugit Venus ? Hcu I quove color o d r ecens ?' H . Lib iv Od. 12. ~"1, 1 1 ?tether files Love? Ah ! where the charming bloom ? :1111Tn e l Public opinion . is now gradually establishing the grand tc;!'. .uman h education, that it is a s to much the duty of the guar -474 a ir y 4ouott. : t u e l r f m erfl o a t l i e a t t o id a ni tte o n ra d ls. the vigour of her frame, as 4 e 0 .w1! t . of this injunction will be seriously ne fe w lt l e n te t;r m og in ins o iv n e s 1 4 4 a in g : Important ac cs t ianges be are advancin visible, so necessary to the 11, 4 ith of future getri"ent'ationcso.li'ing TESTIMONIALS. tti llsl work can be s a uthors ntained as f o r a the c recom o :r v e e nd om , ed as well for the moral the xte successful result of the experience."—London Morning Journal. 1!!ll agree with the Editor of the London Morning Journal , ' .411. 1 1,Z ammend Mr. Goss's publication for general perusal."— gh Weekly Paper. . t urgh prece P9 pts c ontained in this w or k are interesting and useful." or. 1"4, 1 2 work is properly called an analysis of certain complaint! ; .en in a very peculiar style of moral admonition."—Dublin JournaL 1 / 4 1 lo ' r t g' t 7 is combined with simplicity, and we rnornmend the work I Hie s!, --Dublin Weekly Journal. 41 1. c m , A•NIC HEALTH ; a Familiar Tre-cise on Nervous Diseases it from th e o ap ye decline , sent post mosft free for 3s. be bad of Sherwood and Co., 23, Paternoster-row ;g, L 3, l'aifton.strcet, Dublin ; and of all Beoksellers.—Priee in a sealed envelope. tt 'ip t. t i s , 7 .; i GOSS and . CO. may he consulted, every day, at their Lt ed ,c patients in the remotest part, of he country can be sa ti h i n 7.".' e t !sfully, on their de . scribing minutely the case—and if Scullydit i %1' xlicieenesofcal Ibefofora„lavrTiee'da t n o a ri o n y swer imm l e d el t iatlly o efu i can occur, as the Medianes be securely of w pa o c r ke'd and protected from observation. I. ; - elneasterislace, Strand, nea rederloo.bridge, London. 4 .1 Theses works wil lbe forwar by post on receiving a Post w tiler for Three Shillingo. lected ended• r , the is in a ()Tido° u nfit stance s tance as un !large° a• a that ink In of the lons of regent. 'in had taxter. uy the, Filndit y plaCt*. .0 V 163 'crelle 6 A) 5U O' the t he xe a De° 50 ~'•r. 'ors. .111, 31r * w etter er,hire• Lr. of Ilia ,tbanie l • in the v THE ADELAIDE HOTEL, L 0 NDON-BRIDGE. MR. FOOK S, having heel 3. instructed by the Proprietor to DISPOSE OF 1 his valuable Concern by PRIVATE CONTRACT, solicits the at tE ntion of those who may be desirous of embarking in a FIRST-RAT E ESTABLISHMENT, and which, by ordinary application, will 1 d ways be a lucrative one. The ADELAIDE HOTEL is admirably 'situate for business, conve nience, and pleasure, in the most crow ded thoroughfare of the Me tropolis of the world, at the foot of the ix bh st bridge, on the banks of its finest river. At this spot arrive fron t , every habitable division of the earth, the prince, the merchant, the St Adler, the sailor, the tra veller of every grade. From this 11( de 1 passengers embark for France, Italy, Holland, Belgium, Genna 8,c., and to all parts of Europe, Asia, Africa, and America; in ch •ed, without hyperbole, it may be termed " The Starting-point of flat Globe." To every fashion able Watering-place and Town of imp ovil ince or public resort, the access from hence is as ready as it is ea 3Y, whether by steam-boat or by railway. Every minute in the day br utp s conveyances to and from the east, west, north, and south parts of tl .is great City, and the com munication with all the railways is c or tinuous and certain. The situation is 'without a rival ; land and v rater vie with each other in offering the greatest advantages for sect It lug a home and foreign con nexion, and an extensive and profitable • business. The exterior of the Adelaide Hotel presents noble front a ges to the river and bridge, with a spacious terrace overlooking L o th. The interior pourtrays well the ability of the architect. Large u ul well-proportioned coffee rooms, elegant dining and drawing-room n a, light and airy sleeping apartments, all commanding beautiful vie-s - s of the Thames ; commo dious wine and smoking rooms, so excelleso tly placed as to be distinct from the Ilotel ; with cellarage, for size, col •enience, and temperature, unequalled in the metropolis. The Tap a nd domestic offices are in unison with the admirable arrangement I )f the whole structure. In fine, rich as London is in hotels, not on a presents equal capabilities (to a person possessing activity and mod el 'ate capital) for realising in a few years an independent fortune. Mr. Fooks is authorised to treat, as to tl to coming in, with responsible parties in a spirit of liberality. Particv tars and cards to view can only be obtained at his offices, 1, Serle-s nett, Lincoln's Inn-fields. PUBLICAT lONS Just published, price 0 e :' Shilling, CURRENCY EXPLAIN ED, in REFUTA• TION of the LAST FALLACY of the " TIMES." By YERIIS. Samuel Clarke, 13, Pall-mall East ; a rit I Cowie, Jolland, and Co. 31, Poultry. CHARLES COLLING. --- A. PORTRAIT of this eminent Breeder of Short ri ores, with a Biographical Sketch by C. W. Johnson, Esq., at ir ars in the " FARMER's MAGAZINE" for FEBRUARY. May he had by order of al 1 Booksellers. The " Farmer's Magazine," Vol. XI containing 12 Steel En gravings, price 10s. 6d., cloth boards, is just published. Office, 24, Norfolk-street, I. [rand. London. REMOVED FROM BIRMINC iHAM TO LONDON. Just published, price 2s. 6d., and fre e 'by post (in a sealed en velope), 3s. 6 d. , THE SILENT FRIEND ;. a Medical Work on Physical Decay, its causes, at id the baneful effects of excessive indulgence and infection, i Ilustrated by engravings, with observations on Marriage, and di sections for the removal of certain disqualifications. By R. in dL. PERRY and Co. Published by the Authors, and sol i by Strange, 21, Paternos ter-row ; Field,6s, Quadrant, Regen' t-; street; Purkis, Compton street, Soho ; Jackson and Co., 131 ), New Bond-street : Phil lips, 264, Oxford-street ;J. Gordon , 146, Leadenhall-street, London; Guest, 51, Bull-street, B irmingham ; and by all Booksellers In Town and Country. The CORDIAL BALM of SYR .LOCUM is exclusively di rected for the cure of nervous and 'muscular debility, impuis sance, &c. Price 1 Is. and 335. per bottle. Sold by all Me dicine Venders, of whom may be "had the " Silent Friend." The Five Found Cases may be had us usual. PERRY'S PURIFYING SPI :CIFIC PILLS are the most effectual cure for syphilis and a , tcondary symptoms in both sexes, price 2s. 9d., 4s. 6d., and 1 is. per box. Consultation fee, if by letter, 11. A minute detail of cases is necessary. Messrs. Perry are ii r 'daily attendance, for Con sultation, at their residence, 19, Bc Tat Ts-street, Oxford-street, London ,from Eleven till Eight, and '•on Sundays from Ten till One Vne personal visit only is nee essary to effect a perma nent cure. DR. CULVERWELL'S LECT'UI LE TO YOUNG MEN. " How best the fickle fab tie to support Of mortal man ; in heal th ful body how A healthful mind the lo *gest to maintain." Elegant Pocket Edition, with Engra, rings, price Is. ;by post, Is. 6d. ON NERVOUS and L lELICATE HEALT H YOUNG PERSONS; or st•tri ming " Old Age in Youth ful Bodies." Half an hour's closet r ending explanatory of the defi. ciency of those attributes and sensibil ill es, aLd that vigour of frame and own which characterise and dsf •nify the healthy and well organised individual, and of the cause .al 'those nervous and dyspep tic symptoms so often observed in earl) life, and which unfit the possessor for the ordinary duties of sod Ay. By R. J. CULVERWI LL, M.D., Member of the Royal College r of Surgeons, &c. &c. The above little address has the Roll owing recommendations :-- The author is a legitimate practitioseex of twenty years' standing in his professionrand writes not from loooks, but from observation. His pages are wholly free from the. :spirit of cant or empiricism, and are addressed to the intellig awe of the times. Among other topics will be found a Re view of the Physiology of Life in its Progress from the l Youth to the Man, and the Diseases mostly incident to and accp fired during that period; also the great end and aim of life—nan rely, " Marriage ;" its intent, obligations, and physical and constitu Cone' disqualifications, medi cally considered. To be had of Sherwood, 23, Pal trnoster-row ; Cavalho, 147 , Fleet.stieet ; Hannay, 63, Oxford- streot; Mann, 39, Cornhill ; and the Author, 21, Arundel.street, Strand, who may be advised with personally or by letter. At horns ally till two; eltininl seven till nine. WITH THE P I S P A T C H, ONE HUNDRED AND TWELVE COLUMNS, Equal to an Octavo Volume of Six Hundred Pages, containing THE WHOLE OF THE GREAT TRIAL IN DUBLIN. SHELL'S SPEECH WILL BE CONTAINED IN THE FIRST SUPPLEMENT, TO-MORROW, FEB. 4, 1844. ~.• Orders received by all Newsvenders and Booksellers, and by Mr. Wood, at the Office, 139, Fleet-street. . pIiBLICATIONS of the SOCIETY for the EMANCIPATION of INDUSTRY. Nov Ready. AN ESSAY ON MONEY, ITS ORIGIN AND USE. By JOHN TAYLOR, Author of " Junius Idea tied." Third Edition, revised. Price 2s. Gd. AN ESSAY on the STANDARD and MEA SURE of VALUE. Second Edition. Price 2s„ 6d, _ _ ItiRRENCY FALLACIES REFUTED, and A...) PAPER MONEY VINDICATED. Second Edition. Price 2576 d. CATECHISMS of the CURRENCY and EX CHANGES. A new Edition, Enlarged. Price 4s. cloth; or, separately, The Currency, 2s. ; Exchanges, 2s. T HE MONETARY POLICY of ENGLAND and AMERICA. Price One Shilling. " It is necessary your gold should be coined, and have the king's stamp upon it, to secure men in receiving it, that there is so much gold in each piece. But it is not necessary that it should have a fixed value set on it by public authority."—Locke. THE MINISTER MISTAKEN ; or, THE QUESTION of DEPRECIATION ERRONEOUSLY STATED by Mr. HUSKISSON. Price One Shilling. " Our forefathers, who sought comfort in proverbs, used to say, when the people's tale of bricks is doubled, Moses is at hand."— N ebuhr. CURRENCY EXPLAIN ED; in REFUTATION of the LAST FALLACY of " THE TIMES," Nov. 8111, 1843. By VESUS. Price One Shilling. London : Samuel Clarke, 13, Pall-Mall East, and to be had (by order) of all Booksellers. SCIENCE AND AMUSEMENT COMBINED. THE BUILDER, an Illustrated Weekly Journal. A publicatioh fitted alike for the drawing-rooom, the studio, the office, the worshop, and the cottage. Price 3d., stamped 4d. The Numbers may be had separately or in Monthly Parts. Vol. 1., containing upwards of 300 illustrations, elegantly bound in cloth, 15s. 2, York-street, Covent-garden. • No. 5, price Gd., stamped to go free by post, of The G ARDENERS' CHRONICLE AND • AGRIC ULTUR AL GAZETTE Is this day published, and may be had, by order, of any Newsvender Office for Advertisements, 5, Charles-street, Covent-garden, London. LE MIROIR FRANCAIS; ou, REPERTOIRE de la LITTERATEUR FRANCAISE CONTEMPORAINE. Part IL, just published (price 2s. 6d.), contains articles from the distinguished pens of MM. Jules Janin, G. de Moieties, Alexandre Dumas, Alfred de Musset, Charles Blanc, &c., &c. The Proprietors gratefully acknowledge the distinguished patronage accorded to the first Number, which encourages them in their undertaking to pro duce a monthly publication which shall be a valuable addition to the tables of clubs and reading-rooms, and a desirable acquisition in all families studying the French language. London : Sherwood, Gilbert, and Piper, Paternoster-row ; Dulau and Co., 37, Soho-square ; and D. Nutt, 158, Fleet-street. THE WILL FORGERIES. RE-EXAMINATION OF BARBER, FLETCHER, AND MRS. DOREY. MANSION HOUSE. The investigation into this case was resumed yesterday, before the Right Hon. the Lord Mayor, who took his seat on the bench a little after eleven o'clock. Mr. Wilde attended for Mr. Wilkins, to defend Mrs. Dorey ; Mr. Parry attended for Mr. Chambers, on behalf of Barber. The prisoners, William Henry Barber, Joshua Fletcher, and Thomas Griffin, were then placed in the dock, and the prisoner Georgiana Dorey was, as on former occasions, accommodated with a seat at the table. George Gorsuch was then examined by Mr. Clarkson—l am at present in the employ of Messrs. Hailing, silk mercers, at Waterloo House. In. the month of March last year I engaged myself as an assistant to Mr. Dorey. My engagement commenced on Wed nesday the 29th of March, and I stayed till the 19th of April. Mrs. Dorey was in the shop every day while I was there. I re member the production by Mrs. Dorey of a 1,5001. note, on the second Saturday after I went there. Mrs. Dorey came home in a cab the previous evening after tea time with her sister, Mrs. San ders. Mr. Dorey brought a 1,0001. Bank of England note into the shop, and showed it to me. I did not see Mrs. Sanders and Mrs. Dorey leave together. Mrs. Sanders went out about half an hour after this. I did not hear from Mrs. Sanders, in the presence of Mrs. Dorey, where she was going. She went away in an omnibus, returned in about an hour and a half, and came into Mr. Dorey's. Mrs. Dorey was at home. Mrs. Sanders had with her a bag. It was a brown bag, which appeared to be full, and I heard a jingle as it went through the shop. It sounded like gold. I cannot recollect whether Mr. Dorey was in the shop. To the best of my recollection Mrs. Sanders left on the following Monday, about two o'clock. Mrs. Dorey went with her. It was stated she was going to Bristol. I had been in the habit of seeing Mrs. Dorey write. (A note being here handed to the witness. He was asked if he recognised in it Mrs. Dorey's handwriting. The witness (read—" Miss Slack, 7, Francis street, Tottenham-court-road," upon the note, and said it was Mrs. Dorey's handwriting.) Mr. Clarkson said this was a note for 1,0001. which had been before produced in evidence—it was No. 96,767. The date was the Ist of February, and It was proved to have been changed at the Bank on that day. The witness then withdrew. . . . Henry istrdsley, late a grocer in Whitechapel, who had married one of the daughters of Mr. Nevill, of Francis-street, Tottenham court-road, deposed that Martha Nevill, his wife's sister, had on the 9th of March, given him an order for some goods, which he had sent to No. 7, Francis-street. Mr. Wybrow lived for twenty-four years, until Dec. 1842, at 24, Rathbone-place, " The Temple of Apollo." Mrs. Dorey came as Miss Richards, about my lodgings, I believe in December, 1838. She took the second floor, unfurnished. She said she was in thePantheonßazaar. When she came to live there she was accompanied by her mother and her two nieces, the Misses Sanders. They staid with me about two years. Mrs. Dorey's mother appeared about seventy-five years of age. Her eyes were occasionally weak. I have seen her walk out. She went rather infirm and stooped. I have seen her walk- ing with an umbrella. I used to see the prisoner Dorev go out of a morning. The mother went to Camberwell in the summer of 1340. I believe, and I think they all quitted in No vember, 1840. After she had quitted the bazaar I recollect hear ing Miss Richards and her neice say that Mrs. Richards had gone do Camberwell for the benefit of her health. Cross-examined by Mr. Wilde—l am sure that I was told by Mrs. Dorey that the old lady had gone to Camberwell. Sydney Hampden Wybrow, the son of the last witness—Lived with her at 24, Rathbone-place. I remember the female prisoner. Mr. Clarkson—Look at the prisoner Fletcher, do you recognise any one that has called on Miss Richards? Witness—l think I have seen the furthest one in the brown coat (Barber) several times. I do not recognise any one else as having called on her. Mr. Parry—Look at those persons standing at the bar. It is evi dent you have been making a mistake from the manner in which Mr. Clarkson put the question. Do you mean to swear that you have seen that person in the brown coat call on Miss Richards? Witness — I believe so, but should not like to swear it. It was four or five years ago. I have never seen him since, until about five minutes ago in the passage. Mr. Parry—Who told you to go into the passage to see those people ? Some one desired my father and myself to walk into the passage to see if we could recognise any one. Mr. Parry—Let Mr. Wybrow, sen., go out of Court. Mr. Wybrow then withdrew. Examination resumed—l saw him several times. I have had op portunities of speaking to him two or three times. On several oc casions I opened the door to him. I believe him to be the man. I believe I heard him ask if Miss Richards was at home. I believe my father did not recognise any one in the passage. I told my father in the passage I thought I knew one of them. I did not mention to him which. Mr. Parry—ln what order did they go up ? The yotmg man. have no doubt, is under a mistake. - Witness—The one on my right hand (Fletcher) came up first. They came up in the order they were standing. (The prisoner Barber had entered the Court first, and had been followed by Fletcher, who passed him, and took his place at the end of the desk. The order in which they were standing in relation to the witness, was—Fletcher, next to him Forester the officer, then Griffin, and last of all Barber.) Mr. Wybrow, senior, recalled, and cross-examined by Mr. Parry —I did not recognise ally of the persons who passed up, excepting Mrs. Dorey. I think it probable that if any of those persons had been in the habit of calling on her, I must have recognised them. I know several gentlemen used to call. I do not recognise any of the persons at the bar. My son said to me, " I think I have seen the tall person there." (The witness pointed to Griffin, as the person recognised by his son.) James Phillips—l know the handwriting of Mrs. Dorey. I was concerned as her attorney. I see the paper which purports to be the will of Mary Hunt. Cross-examined by Mr. Wilde—l believe the body of the will, to gether with the name of one of the attesting witnesses, Jane Rose, to be her handwriting. I cannot say as to the signature of Mary Hunt. The witness likewise swore that the signature Eliza Burchard, in the Bank book, and all the various other documents, was In Mrs. Dorey's writing. The words, " Miss Slack, 7, Francis-street, Tottenham-court-road," on the back of the 1,0001. note, were her writ ing. The words, " Miss Burchard, 9, Great Russell-street, Blooms bury," on this 51. note, are also her handwriting. The witness was cross-examined by Mr. Wilde, but nothing mate rial was elicited from him. Mr. Clarkson said this was all the evidence which he proposed to go into that morning, Miss Slack being in a state of health which made it unsafe for her to attend. Ile would suggest that all the other witnesses in the case should wait until the evidence was perfected to hear it read over. If his Lordship thought there would not be time to do so on that day, he had no objection to an adjournment. He hoped that in a fortnight he would be able to adduce thriller evidence. Mr. Wilde inquired if the case of Miss Slack was concluded ? Mr. Clarkson said it was, unless fresh evidence should be collected between that day and the day to which the prisoners were remanded. Mr. Ilumfrey, as solicitor for Mr. Fletcher, asked Forrester, the officer, whether he had not found some papers in the prisoner's house ? Forrester said he had found some deposit receipts, which were ready to be produced when called for. Mr. Humfrey said he believed his client, Mr. Fletcher, was in a more unfortunate position than either of the other prisoners. He had been deprived of a deposit receipt for 1,1001. in: the London and Westminster Bank, and of a receipt for 1,0001. in the Funds, and owing to this circumstance he was unable to obtain the assistance of Counsel. He had been imprisoned for eight weeks. He was un able to gather from the examination the precise nature of the charges against him. Tie submitted to the Lord Mayor that the prisoner was not fairly treated. Mr. Freshfield explained that it appeared from the evidence that the sum of 1,3001., lodged in the London and Westminster Bank in the name of the prisoner Fletcher, was the proceeds of the sale of the funds belonging to Miss Slack. In conformity with the provisions of an Act of Parliament, which directed that in cases like the present, parties claiming the stock should follow the person of those who had obtained it by fraud, and should also follow the money. Mr. Baxter, Miss Slack's legal adviser, had warned the Bank not to pay the amount in question to him. With regard to the 1,0001. in the Funds, no application had been made to transfer the sum. Mr. Parry complained that Mr. Barber was kept in solitary con finement at the Compter, and applied to the Lord Mayor for permis sion for some other person, not connected with the case; to be placed in the cell with him. Mr. Wilde applied for permission for Mrs. Dorey's husband to visit her in prison. The LORD MAYOR thought his orders must:bemistaken in reference to Barber. He would take care that the prisoners should not be sub jected to greater severity than was necessary. The prisoners were then remanded to next Friday week. PRICE OF WooL.—Since the beginning of Novem ber wool has risen above 40 per cent., and still looks upwards, and as the manufacturers have no stocks on hand, the farmers may confidently look forward for several years to good prices, in spite of all the exertions of the League.—Kelso Mail. BRIGHTON.—THE DUKE OF CAMBRIDGE.—On Saturday morning his Royal Highness took his gun and went into Col. Wyndham's preserves, but before he had any sport he kicked against the stump of a tree, and had rather a se vere fall. His Royal Highness returned to Petworth House immediz. , tely, but we are happy to state that he was able to dine with the company, the only inconvenience he felt from the accident being a stiffness in the shoulder. On Sunday his Royal Highness attended Divine service in the parish church, both in the morning and afternoon, and on the fol lowing day took his departure for Goodwood, oa a visit to the Duke and Duchess of Richmond. THE STATE TRIALS. SIXTEENTH DAY. (B EXPRESS.) (FROM OUR OWN REPORTERS.) DUBLIN, THURSDAY, FEB. 1. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH. THE QUEEN V. DANIEL O'CONNELL AND OTHERS. Mr. WHITESIAE, the counsel for the 'editor of the Nation, commenced his address to the jury at a quarter past ten o'clock, and said he wished that Mr. Duffy had selected from among his brethren of the bar, and among whom there could be found so many possessi ng super i or t a l en t, one mo re com tioneardeavosecdatebyhis cause ; his inferiority to others was P g e re te a n tl t y the disparity which existed between his humble abilities and the arduous task which was committed to him to discharge. Nevertheless, being assured of the con scientious feelings of the jury, being convinced of their intelli gence, and satisfied of their anxiety candidly to hear whatever might be urged on the behalf of the accused, from whatever quarter it might proceed, he had come to the resolution to un dertake the present duty. The crime alleged against the several defendants was a crime of a peculiarly defined character. If that peculiar crime, as it was explained.and described on the face of the indictment, be not clearly and distinctly proved, no matter what might be the other supposed offences of the traversers—no matter what might be, even by possibility, suggested that they might: be guilty of—they would be bound to acquit them of the present indictment. To find men guilty of one charge because it may be surmised that, by pos sibility, they may be accused or guilty of another, would be to violate the law—to violate the justice of the case—from the strict line of that duty they (the jury) were not to swerve. He would say it with deference that they were not to re member any one word which was spoken or written by the traversers, or by any one of them, which was not proved in the indictment against them on the present occasion. The crime of which the traversers was accused was that of a conspiracy. In the proper acceptation of that word there was nothing criminal in it—it simply meant having one speech —that there was one prevailing idea, and that of com mon consent among men, for the accomplishment of a common object—but a community of sentiment on political subjects was not criminal. Associations existed in the present day, literary, scientific, religious, and benevolent—the object of all was to accomplish a given end, and for this they concen trate their opinions and strength, that they might bring them to bear on a particular or a common object—and which otherwise they never could accomplish. Governments, it was well known, were always biassed against, and adverse to, popular movements—they were always repugnant to change —so that very great efforts—a great concentration of opinion was necessary to obtain from them that which parties might regard as beneficial. It was by such means that the wisest reforms were effected, and the grandest trumphs in humanity were accomplished, and the most righteous and wisest projects had been achieved. In ordinary cases, where men are charged with particular crimes, they ate to be proved guilty by what they themselves had done ; and the evidence by which they were to be convicted was to be strict and rigid, and the facts prescribed were to be all prescribed by law. But, as was seen in this crime of conspiracy, one man is affected not by what he has done himself—not by what he has spoken himself—not by what he has committed himself, but by what others may have done or spoken—that is, some may suffer not the consequences of their own acts or of their own speeches, but theymay suffer the consequences of the conduct of others. That men should suffer the consequences of their own conduct was natural and right, because a man can control either his own language or his own conduct; but it was difficult to understand why persons should be held responsible for the acts of others over whose movements they could have no control—whose tongues they can neither silence nor check—over whose actions they have neither authority nor power. If in ordinary cases that ob servation was founded in good sense, it was of more weight when applied to the charge of political conspiracy. It was, therefore, necessary for the jury to be on their guard; for why should the incautious language, or the improper actions of one man be visited on another, because that the other man may happen to be an obnoxious individual ? The traversers were accnsed of having conspired to excite discontent and disaffection among her Majesty's subjects. He should have occasion to comment on every part of the indictment. The terms of that indictment were, " that the ac cused had devised to raise and create discontent and disaffec tion amongst the liege subjects of the Queen, to promote feelings of towards her Majesty's subjects in England, to excite disaffection in the army, and to cause large meet ings to be held for the unlawful purpose of obtaining, by means of the intimidation to be thereby caused—by means of the demonstration of great physical force at such assemblies, to bring into hatred and disrepute the Courts of Law established in Ireland, with the intent to induce her Majesty's subjects to withdraw the adjudication of their differences with, and claims upon, each other from the cognizance of the said Courts of Law established. and to submit the same to the judgment and determinion of other tribunals to be consti tuted and contrived for that purpose." Now, it was that tingle crime of conspiracy teat the jury had to try—they were to ascertain whether the accused were guilty of having entered into a conspiracy to do the precise acts, the very speci fied things described and particularised in that most extraordi nary, unprecedented, and unheard-of indictment. The Attorney-General , whom, he thought, had stated his case with great moderation and temper, and, he would add, with firmness and candour—the Attorney -General commenced his address, as might have been expected, by a statement of the principles and the authorities which he said were necessary to explain the subject-matter of the accusation. As to general principles, they afforded but little opportunity for dispute. It was the ap plication of those principles to the facts of the case on which he should comment. As to the short definition of conspiracy that had been given, no doubt could be entertained. Conspiracy meant the accomplishing a legal object by illegal means, er an illegal object by legal means. The first case quoted (the King v. James) had not the least analogy to the present accusation. It was an indictment against a bank rupt, charging him with conspiracy to conceal a part of his personal estate, and that an illegal act bad been committed. Lord Denman stated that that indictment ought to show that an unlawful act had been done by unlawful means. Certain it was that the indictment in the present instance did not so demonstrate. In the second case adverted to, several per sons dined together; they pursued that common object with industry and perseverance—( Laughter) they agreed to sup together ; they confederately pursued that common object also with perseverance and industry : they finally determined to go to the play, and, having gone to the play, one of them havingtra-par ultra-Protestant rattled t it ; a third had a neck o f a b ro k en b ott l e , an d he suffered his u l principles i; togo so far that he thre w it on another having a whistle , w histled the stage at the theatre. Th ey were a ll t r i e d for a conspiracy. The grand jury igno re d t h e bill s . The Attorney-Gene ral, nothing daunted, r e f erre d t h e matter to a jury. The formidable case of conspiracy was accordingly tried, and no verdict was returned, except that acquitting Mr. Browilow. The next ca ehe conceived to be more applicable. It was the King v. Murphy, and it was stated—" If you believe the acts done were done without a common design between the parties, this charge of conspiracy cannot be supported. The common design—that is to say, to do an illegal act specified—is the root of the charge ; if Sou find that these two parsons pursued by their acts the same object, often by the same means, one performing one part of the act, and another performing another part of the same act, so as to completed it, with a view to accomplishing a certain object, you are at liberty to draw the conclusion that the parties were engaged in a conspiracy to effect that object." He had to observe that the object to be gained was in the case just cited an illegal object, because the persons agreed together to prevent the collection of a certain rate, and to o bstruct an indivi vidual in his duty — that is, the collection o f the rate—and to take from him the property he had seized. The object, he repeated, was an illegal one, and it was declared per sonthatoanneother at one moment having done part of th e act, and having contrived to complete the act , they ( the j ury) then were at liberty to come to the conclusion as to conspiracy, and the persons were accordingly found guilty. The next case quoted by the Attorney- General was to be foun d in Kni g ht, Carting. ton, and Payne's Reports. The first c ount declared that an unlawful and seditious opposition to her Majes t y's Government had been committed. The second count charged the parties with having " induced a number of persons to assemble and meet together, for the purpose of exciting terror and alarm in the minds of her Majesty's subjects, and by means of such terror and alarm to procure great changes to be made in the Constitution of the realm as by law established, and to annoy and alarm, disturb and prejudice, divers subjects of the Queen, in the peaceable enjoyment of their property." In that case certain policemen were asked whether, in point of fact, anybody in the kingdom had complained to them of alarm being inspired in their minds by the general character of the meetings. In the course of evidence, a Mr. Roberts stated that several persons complained that were alarmed at those meetings, and requested him to send for military assistance. On that evi dence the parties were found guilty. Their Lordships would please to observe that according to authority in that case, it became competent to ask each policeman examined in the present matter of conspiracy, not only whether anything occurred which was calculated to excite alarm, but whether that alarm had filled the minds of certain persons during the proceed ings which took place. The next case to which reference had been made was one in which the accused (Stone) was charged with conspiring against one Jackson, a person who died from taking poison. Evidence was given to connect the accused with another man of the same name residing in France. Jackson had received a letter on the subject, and Lord Kenyon at first conceived that the act of another person could not be given in evidence against the prisoner. Mr. Justice Buller was on the bench, and on the second day Lord Kenyon said be was satisfied that the letter was admis sible. That letter was given in evidence, and the jury, im pressed with a sense of the danger of finding one man guilty for the act of another, gave a verdict of acquittal. The next case to which reference had been frequently made, was the King v. Redhead, to be found in Howe's State 'I rials. In that case the matters relied on in proof of the conspiracy, were explained by proper averments. The Attorney-General had relied on a certain passage to which he (Mr. Whiteside) would take the liberty of directing attention. It was to this effect :—" If the conduct of the defendant had been merely a speculation of his own, it would be a different thing ; but when it was set forth that there was a large assembly in the case, it becomes necessary. to kno sr whether he did not address them with a view to inflame their minds and their passions ; if it could be proved that the act of combining, the results which took place, and the providing of a rms arose f rom a pure motive, they might acquit. In the case in question, the pri soner was found guilty. Now he did not perceive the justice of that distinction drawn by his Learned Friend, in reference to that case—namely, that a great man might broach opinions which a man in another position in life could not broach. There was no law supporting such a distinction, and his Learned Friend had not stated the true doctrine of the Consti tution. He would now direct the attention of the jury to the language of an eminent jedge in a case recorded in the 32d vol. State Trials :—" It is not necessary," said Mr. Justice Buller, "to elicit positive evidence from persons who heard the conspirators consult; if you should find that a certain plan was entered into, and you shall be satisfied from what was done that there was a conspiracy to do certain illegal acts, you may then draw the conclusion Of conspiracy." In that case the jury had the good sense to acquit the prisoner. In the next case referred to an action was brought againt the military. The Learned Judge said, "If they acted on a warrant they were themselves under the circumstances of the case justi fied ; in truth, these persons would be entitled to their acquittal, acting as they dii in pursuance of the warrant, although the parties granting the warrant might not." The next case referred to conspiracy, and in support of the plea evidence was required as to whether a person felt any ,alarm during the proceedings of the meeting. He was asked whether he would go with these persons to get a big loaf for 'a little one. He said they would have reform in Parliament, and make their way to London to effect that purpose ; and that they would make use of the property of anybody who had property on their march as they went on the road. About 700 of these persons proceeded to drill. Evidence was also given by a person who signed a paper which he sent to the magistrates, expressing the terror and alarm which he experienced in consequence of those parties meeting for drill. It was also proved in evidence (page 96) that im pressions of terror and alarm were made on the inhabi• tants by a meeting at which Hunt presided. In page 99 of the charge it is said—" In one of these counts drillings are alleged, which are stated to be clandestine, but whe ther they are clandestine or not I give no opinion ; but if done for the purpose of overawing the Government, or ex citing tumult or resistance to the chi' powtr, they would be unlawful. It is also alleged that divers of those persons assembled unlawfully, armed with stones and various weapons to carry out this conspirocy." In page 1 02 , he says—" If they came armed, so as to terrify other per sons, that in itself would be an unlawful assembly." His Lordship then referred to the memorable case of Lord George Gordon, and the vast meeting of people in SL George's-fields, and said—" There were called toge ther an immense number of persons in St. George's-fields. (Kennett was then Lord Mayor of London.) They met for the ostensibly legal purpose of petitioning Parliament not to re peal the Acts passed in favour of Roman Catholics. Lord Gordon went with their petition to the House of Commons. They , accompanied kim there. There was nothing amiss in that"-70,000 or 80,000 people meeting in London, and speeches being made in a very vehement, if not in a very vio lent manner, and then going en masse to the House of Com mons, was not amiss—" except it was indiscreet, because it had the appearance of being tumultuous ; and if they were not satisfied with the result, some of them might break forth into acts of violence." They were not satisfied; they broke out, and we know the result—confusion in London for an immense number of days. He (Mr. White. ' side) would not trouble their Lordships by stating the judgment of the Court on the matter of drill ing. In the case of the King v. Hunt, 3d Barnewall and Alderson, the parties were indicted for a conspiracy. The evidence was not given in the Report ; but the result was given, which was that the accused were acquitted of the con spiracy, but found guilty of being at an illegal assembly. He (Mr. Whiteside) had procured a report of the evidence, with the view of showing on what evidence the Court and jury came to such a conclusion. The Learned Gentleman then produced a history of the life of Henry Hunt, which contained an ac count of his trial, from which he (Mr. W.) read the evidence of several witnesses examined for the prosecution. The evi dence was to this effect—that a meeting was held in Spital fields, London, at which a series of resolutions were adopted. The first of these was, that if the grievances of the people were not redressed within a given day, and the Parliament re formed, they (the persons composing the meeting) would be all released from their allegiance. That Mr. Hunt pre sided at that meeting, and afterwards at a meeting in l's an chester, at which the same resolution was proposed and carried. It was also resolved that they should meet together to elect re presentatives for Manchester. They did so without any writ from the Crown, and the magistrates declared that meeting illegal. On the night of the 14th of August, 1819, they met on White Moss, where they were drilled. Two policemen were present, and having been discovered were severely beaten, but their lives were spared on their promising never to be King's men again, and never to name the King's name during their lives. On the morning of the 16th they met in Man chester. They came to the place of meeting with flags and banners, marching in military array, with sound of bugle, &c. Threats of making a Moscow of Manchester were heard. Several mottos ol a seditious character were inscribed on their banners, and great terror and alarm was ex cited. A controversy arose on the trial as to how far all the persons at the meeting were affected by the inscriptions on the banners. Justice Bayley, who charged the jury, ob served on this point—" With respect to the banners, those only who showed that they were favourable to any motto in scribed on them by carrying them, or immediately marching under them, could be considered as liable to any penalty which the illegal nature of any of the inscriptions might warrant." He (Mr. Whiteside) called particular attention to that part of the charge, because in the present case evidence was adduced of an arch that was erected, on which was a motto, and that motto was brought forward as evidence of the illegal intentions of persons going to that assembly. Having commented with severity on the resolutions passed at the meetings at Spital fields, the case went to the jury ; and on that charge and those facts they acquitted the defendants of the crime of conspiracy, and found them guilty of attending an unlawful assembly. The Learned Gentleman next referred to the case of the Queen v. Vincent, 9 Carrington and Payne, p. 91, a case which the Attorney-General did not cite. The CHIEF JUSTICE—He did. Mr. WHITESIDE said it was another case of the same na ture in the same book. In this case the defentlints were charged, first, with having combined together maliciously to assemble for an unlawful purpose. The second count charged them with having assembled in immense numbers, armed with weapons ; and with having caused great terror and alarm to the peaceable and well-disposed subjects of her Majesty, for the.unlawful and seditious purpose of offering unlawful and seditious opposition to the Government and Constitution, and to the terror and alarm of the subjects of the Queen. Another count charged them with assembling with clubs, &c. The 12th count charges them with being at an unlawful assembly ; and the 13th for a riot. He wanted to show that, in this case the same result followed, and that those counts which were not found in the present indictment were those on which, according to the authority of the Learned Judge and the finding of the jury, a verdict was had. The Learned Gentle man then read portions of the evidence given in the case of the Queen v. Vincent, to show that violent language had been used at a public meeting at which the defendants were present, and that the inhabitants were put into a state of great terror and alarm. Vincent, in his speech, had described the system of Government as cannibal and atrocious—that it doomed men, women, and children to toil in factories, in starvation, and nakedness, to increase the wealth of the aristocracy. The snowball of Chartism was increasing in size, and he called on the people of Newport to roll it down on their oppressors and crush them. He had also threatened the magistrates with violence, and wanted to purchase a large quantity of arms—muskets, cutlasses, pistols, &c.—from a commercial traveller, named Johnson. Baron Alderson said that any meeting assembled under such circumstances, or likely to produce danger to the tranquility of the neighbourhood, was an unlawful assembly. He then alluded to the petition to obtain the five points of the Charter, which points went to a length that sensible persons would think inconsistent with the Constitution s o a f g t e h s e w e h ouienhtrmdit•y country. Gentlemen, nothing is more unfair than to take a pa r t o f a speec h w i thout taking the who l e. I n d o i ng so sentence. wi lbe unable to jud ge j ust l y , f or th ere m ay be many pas- God be thanked," dcshaairdigethteheLeenartioreedm Judgeeanin g of a who presided over the Chartist trials, "that the Constitution does not forbid men t o meet peaceably to petition the Queen. It is the inalienable right of the subject, and surely it is not now to be usurped." It is not evidence to be given against a man for a conspiracy, namely, that he attended a meeting, if that meet ing be not illegal. Neither are the acts of another who may have been guilty of violence to be offered in evidence against a man for attending a legal meeting. He is not accountable for such acts, and cannot be made so. Nor is it evidence of a conspiracy that a number of persons propounded the same doc trines for the accomplishment of the same object. You must convict them of one and the same conspiracy, and of one and the same act—in different counts, if you will—but it must be proved that they have combined to effect an illegal act, or a legal act by illegal means. On the banners which the Man chester rioters bore before them was inscribed—" Englishmen, the blood of your brothers reddens the streets of Preston, and the murderers thirst for more ;" and on another banner was in culcated the observation of peace, law, and order ; but it was decided that such an inculcation was absurd, as their acts were to be evidence of their intentions, and their acts did not correspond with the words which expressed those intentions. Let us see, before we go further, what you are to find the party guilty of. Is it that they have agre-d together for the furtherance of a common object ? No. But that they con federated and conspired, by a complete union of purpose, and a premeditated plan, to do any of those acts charged in the in dictment. Judge PERRIN—Yon don't mean to say that they must find them guilty of every overt act ? Mr. WHITESIDE—NO, my Lord. Judge PERRIN—I was afraid that the jury might misunder stand you, Mr. Whiteside. Mr. WHITESIDE—I thank you, my Lord. I say that they must find them guilty of the whole of the conspiracy, and that these acts were the result of a fixed and settled confederation. Judge By RTON—Is that report of the Chartist trials authen ticated ? Mr. WHITESIDE—It has been published, my Lord, by Mr. Feargus O'Connor. He says that he is quite satisfied that he has been tried by law, and punished by law. The report was taken in short-hand. There has been no evidence pro duced that the acts charged were done in accordance with a previously-arranged plan. My client, Mr. Duffy wished to accomplish the repeal of the Act of Union, which I need not tell you is a perfectly legal Act, for no one Parliament can make a law which another cannot repeal--otherwise the Legislature would be cramped, and posterity would be bound by a number of unjust and oppressive laws. The act of Mr. Duffy is re ceived in evidence, because he is on trial. But if my client agrees with a party for a legal purpose, aided by legal means, he is not accountable for the intemperate conduct of others who are not on their trial, nor is that conduct evidence of guilt. Would the meeting at Trim have been less illegal if a thoustndp with readingersonsm the speeches oreorlesshadst at homea way,ayed? Could it and contented themselves be said that the Hillsborough meeting of seventy-five thousand persons, headed by Lord Downshire in person, was illegal? To agitate for a repeal of the union was perfectly legal, and, therefore, the numbers who attended meetings for effecting that object were only important in so far as they gave alarm to peaceable persons living in the vicinity of the several places of meeting. The meetings mentioned in the indictment had excited no alarm; and he would ask, was the Solicitor-General prepared to affirm the monstrous doctrine which had been laid down by his Learned Colleague,that the more perfect the tranquillity which prevailed at a meeting, the more dangerous was its character—the more they form the determination not to break the law, the more palpable the indications of crime and conspiracy ? He (the Learned Counsel) would say, that meetings of such a nature were always disliked by Kings and their Ministers ; for men born to command disliked the voice of the people when raised in murmur and complaint. Such sounds disturbed the tranquillity of a Court; and Ministers of the Crown, ex cept when they could make popular ferment a stepping stone to power, disliked meetings called to complain of grievances. Such meetings were always unheeded, ex cept when imposing in character and appearance. Sup pose the twelve gentlemen he had then the honour to address met to discuss a fiscal grievance —suppose they passed strong resolutions, their resolutions and their meeting would pass unheeded—they would wither under the silent contempt of the press, and the Minister's shimbers would remain undisturbed. But suppose twelve hundred or twelve thousand such men met and passed similar resolutions, the Minister would begin to look about him—would see that the public mind was stirred, and would consent to discuss remon strances which he had hitherto treated with contempt. A meeting of twelve thousand such men would produce important results ; and yet no man, no legal officer of the Crown, would dare to treat them as conspirators. They would not be con sidered conspirators even if one of their number spoke rashly, or if the incendiary or the spy should have been among them uttering treason and sedition. Now, the humbler classes of so ciety had the same tight to -meet and discuss their grievances as persons in the rank of the gentlemen of the jury, but the opinions of the men of the multitude were not equivalent in individual im portance. and therefore they were obliged to make up the deficiency of moral force by superior numbers. But then, if meetings of those classes, however numerous, were .more orderly than the House of Commons—although, as that august body was now sitting, he must not allude to it—( A laagh)— if the English reporters were astonished at the po liteness of Irish manners—at the moderation of the savages who occupied this portion of tho United Kingdom, then the meetings were as legal as any that might be formed of their more elevated fellow-subjects. He would now call the at tention of the jury to some meetings which had beer, held in England—held under the nose of the Attorney-General, and at the door of the Prime Minister. The first meeting to by y h . he R o s s hul so, theel Crown n was i t t h n a e t s s w . h i l c t h whaasd attended been mentioned by tw o hundred thousand of the lower classes—for it would be an insult to call them rabble—and was met for the purpose of discussing the severe sentence whieh had been passed on the Dorsetshire labourers. Mr. Ross stated that he never had seen such ameeting—a small party of 200,000 men, march ing in procession to the Prime Minister's office, with a petition which it took twenty men to lift, on the subject of a sentence which had been pronounced by one of the Judges of the land ! How was that meeting headed? By a clergyman of the Esta blished Church, dressed in his sacred robes. He (the Learned Counsel) mentioned this fact, because one of the charges against Mr. O'Connell was, that he attended a meeting in his red robe of office. Now he (the Learned Counsel) thought that that fact should' be taken as an indication of Mr. O'Connell's wish to preserve peace and order. No man in office would, if bent on disturbance, go to a meeting decked in the insignia of authority ; he was sure that if their Lordships—with re spect be it spoken—should ever feel inclined to encourage riot, the would never do so decked in the judicial ermine.— ( Loud laughter.) But the meeting to which he had alluded marched through the streets of London, and he would read to the jury some account of its proceedings. (The Learned Coun sel here read reports from the London papers of the meeting, and other great meetings held in England, and then proceeded. ) He would now draw their attention to the way in which the Evening Mail spoke of the great meeting at Hillsborough, at which 75,000 men attended. The people who appeared at that meeting were called " the brave men of the North." He liked them to be called so, for they were a brave body of men. They travelled many miles to attend the meeting at Hillsborough, and they assembled at that meeting in such numbers for the purpose of declaring that by physical force " the union should be main tained, and that they would resist its repeal with their lives and fortunes." And did they think that if these 75,000 smamenemboet again d for ete r t m h i e n ed self-samefront, that the purpose, A a t t n o d r neyand exhibited Soli citor-Generals would not be very much obliged to them;?—( A laugh.) Did they think that if these men met again, and expressed their determination, not only to uphold the union, but to support the Gthernment in the prosecution of those who sought to repeal that measure, that the Attorney-Gene ral would not be most gratified? Did they think that they would not hear from the Attorney-General the expression of his thanks to these brave men of the north for the honour they had conferred on himself individualiy, and upon the Government whose unworthy servant he was—(Laughter) for having, by the demonstration of physical force, expressed their determination to uphold the Church and State, and maintain the sacred institutions of the country?—( Laughter. ) There was not one of those 75,000 men that could not handle a gun ably and well, and the Attorney-General, at the bottom of his heart was glad of it ; and could they doubt that if these 75,000 well-armed and well-disciplined men had met and declared that the union between this country and England was a grievance and must be repealed—did they doubt, he would ask, that an Act repealing the union might not, in a very short space of time, be the law of the land? But they did meet in " border fashion," and they declared they were ready to uphold the union.; and with the view of giving con t age to the Queen's Ministers to oppose the repeal of that mea sure, they stated their determination of being ready to sustain them with their lives and fortunes. If that had been a meeting composed of 500 persons, of what value would such a declaration have been? If it were a meeting of 5,000, or of even 15,000, its value would be doubtful, as re garded this expression of feeling in favour of the Government ; but it was of the first consequence when it came from a well organised body, such as the 75,000 men who met at Hills borough. No doubt the Learned Solicitor-General would endeavour to draw a difference between the meeting at Hills borough and those which took place at Tara at Mullaghmast ; but tie was sure that twelve high-minded and honourable men would not allow paltry, personal, or political considerations, to influence them when they were called upon to give their opinion as to the character of these respective meetings. He would now direct their attention to the evidence which had been given in respect to the several repeal meetings. The wit nesses examined were chiefly policemen, and one or two magis trates ; and yet every one of them admitted that peace and order prevailed at all the meetings ; and this, if it had been necessary, could have been fully established with hundreds of witnesses for the defence. And here, he might observe, that there was not one witness who was able to say that these meetings pro duced the slightest fear or annoyance to either the resident gentry, the merchants, or the traders who resided in the localities where they took place. In fact, all, from east to west, was order and perfect tranquillity. But the Learned Attorney-General contended that the more quiet the meetings, the more criminal—(a laugh)—so that if the question which they had to try was the insanity of an individual, the best evidence, according to the dictum of the Learned Attorney- General, that could be given in support of it, would be to show that the party bad always acted in a perfectly sensible and correct manner, and that in truth his intellect was wholly and entirely unclouded.—( A laugh.) If those men who assembled at the meetings in question had been drunk, and if they had broken each ether's heads, why that would have been all right. It would have been the good old fashion and system by which heretofore Irishmen settled their differences ; but the moment they lay aside their national characteristics, and soberly and steadily meet its large numbers to obtain a great object, then down comes the At torney-General and immediately calls for Coke and Hale to see if he cannot out of this peaceable and orderly proceeding make out something that will ensure a conviction for conspiracy, and this be is to do by means of the gentleman with the scissors—( A laugh)—and then by stringing this speech and that together so involve both speakers and journalists in one common crime as will completely overwhelm them, and pre vent them from appearing at a meeting for the future. It would be absurd to present petitions of the meetings held in August to the House of Commons, when perhaps there might not be thirty persons present—they were, therefore, necessarily reserved until such an impression might be made by an accumulated mass, as well as by the number and variety of the signatures, as could not fail to make an impression on the understanding and feeling of Parliament. Now as to the Mullaghmast meeting—and here he would ask, was it a lawful or unlawful meeting? What was the test to try the legality or illegality of a meeting ? They would say, no doubt, ;that it was to be tested by the acts of the speakers— by the speeches made—by the general conduct of those assembled—whether they had separated quietly, and whether they returned to their homes peaceably. It was the duty of the jury to look at those features, and look at them with the eye of charity—to look at them as freemen, anxious for the rights and privileges of freemen. They were not to view things with the critical eye of a lawyer—they were not to find men guilty who assembled for a peaceable purpose ; nor were they to be looking for something different from what really appeared. Would the great meeting at Hillsborough, at which the Marquis of Downshire and other noblemen and in fluential persons attended, be deemed illegal because some ob scure criminal, a spy, an incendiary, went there—some ballad seller from Belfast, to sell and circulate treason or slander ? Surely it would not. Such was the case of the Mullaghmast meeting. Did Mr. O'Connell, or any other of the tra versers, cause to be published, printed, or circulated, the do cument which was produced in Court, and received in evidence? They did not. They had produced on the table here the E e rizt r e o r u ;v h h t o wi hr h p im ublr e ed on e l v y elt g h e inf l f a o c r ar ti c e 2issociation, and which was pub lished for the Mullaghmast meeting, and which they directed to be printed, and for which he was paid. Were, then, the traversers to be tried, sentenced, and condemned, upon the act of a man whom even the police did not know—who cire culated a document giving a description of something which occurred, no one knew when or where—a document received in evidence to prove the common plot set forth in the indict ment—as evidence of a common union to promote a com mon object—to promote and effect a preconcerted plan ? And yet there was not one particle of evidence pro diced to prove that the paper was printed by the Associa tion, or by their direction. 'Why did not the Attorney-Gene ral produce the man who printed that scandalous and wicked document? Why bring forward a document not proved by its printer? Why keep back his name? And were the jury to fasten the guilt of such a man upon the traversers— to fasten upon them a lying, slanderous document, which they never saw? He complained, then, of keeping back such a witness, and which the Attorney-General should have pro duced. It was not their business to criminate themselves, nor should it be done by any party but by clear and unequi vocal proof; and although that piece of evidence was received by the Court, it should net be received by the jury, unless it was proved that it was part of a common, a preconcerted plan ; for he would lay it down as law, that if that document was even the act of one of the eight traversers, it should not be received as evidence against the others, unless they believed it was, by the assent and consent of all, a part of a precon certed plan. The Court adjourned for refreshment, for a few minutes. At five minutes past two the Court sat again, and Mr. WHITESIDE resumed his address.—Mr. Fitgibbon had given a full statement of what might be considered the best passages of Mr. O'Connell's speeches, and he (Mr. Whiteside) would now take a view of what might be considered the worst. Many of those speeches had not been given in evidence, but the nature of the indictment was such that the prosecution- were enabled to put in a vast number of papers containing reports of speeches, and the jury had to distinguish between those that were proved and those that were not. It was also well known that many speeches were reported which never had been delivered—particularly in the way of poetic ex tracts which the speaker never uttered, but which some times found their way into the written speech. In one of those reported addresses Mr. O'Connell was represented as alluding to the battle of the Boyne, and defeat of the Irish people there. It was singular enough that Sir Walter Scott, in alluding, on one occasion, to the battles of his coun • trymen in " flood and field," admonished the Scots not to fall into the mistake of their ancestors, but to be steady, firm, and united, in their moral agitation, and not to be divided and wavering as their ancestors were in their physical conflicts. This was precisely the meaning of Mr. O'Connell's allusion to the battle of the Boyne. He encouraged the people to firm ness in the political struggle in which they were engaged, by a reference to historical facts. His language plainly meant no thing mote nor less than this—" By their want of perseverance your ancestors lost the memorable battle of the Boyne; in the constitutional struggle in which you are engaged, be sure that you preserve perseverance and unity, and you certainly succeed." The speeches given in the indictniellk were for tha most part made after dinner, and the worst p ots, sages of them were extracted for - the purpose of showing what a wicked man Mr. O'Connell was. As to the word " fog reigner," Mr. O'Connell took that word from the law A cv4-was reported in 3 Barnewall and Adolphus, where a 1411 of exchange was drawn on a person in Ireland, and as there ‘sao only a verbal acceptance, it was contended that that was sutli s . cient, Ireland being a foreign country.-(Laughter.) It cmei pressed on the other side, that that could not be ; but it wig ruled by the Court that Ireland was a foreign country, and that a verbal acceptance of the bill bound the ac ceptor.-(Laughter.) It was observed by one of th• counsel who argued the case that they did not even know where Dublin was.--( Laughter. ) When Mr. O'Connell. said England was a foreign country, he was speaking a I..id truth ; he was certainly speaking of a place beyond the seas; but he (Mr. Whiteside) would require the Solicitor-Genend to prove that, because Mr. O'Connell said this, his (Mr. WA) client conspired to do all the wicked things with which Mr. O'Connell was charged. All that he said about the " stunted corporal" (the Duke of Wellington) and Sir Robert Peel s , o a stied distinguishedw as draw nforth r persons because were he going (M t r o . puto e o h i n; sical force than was at Waterloo," was a mere boastful entree.. p d nre a ol w i n etd b hn y oou p ti t h y itn s g i t c h, al force. His expression, " Here is more phy. sion of pride, showing that the confidence of the masses of the people was enjoyed by him, and that their opinions were as much entitled to be discussed as those of the 75,000 eh. violent of. !h or e massacre at Mullaghmast, he does not stir up a sectarian . -he told the people that it was not a massacre committed b went " shoulder to shoulder" to the Hillsborough meeting. Gentlemen of the jury, in lookin at the Mullaghmast meet. a in s cannot i gzo r u oper; for consider whe u alluding Alr. O ' o o n t u h e e l l's historical speech fact as s a Protestant on a Catholic, but one perpetrated by Cathu ice on Catholics. The Attorney-General called your attention to the character of the proceedings by which the meetings were got together-he told you the people were drilled, and he quoted a case to show that such drilling was illegal ; but he did not tell you that the drilling in that case was per. formed at night, and by a soldier. You, gentlemen, saw the meeting at Donnybrook ; it was composed. of respectable arti sans-we, coming to court, saw them-would you believe any man, if he could be found, to tell you that he was put in terror ?-that he apprehended a breach of the peace, or any danger to either life or property? No, surely -" Ex uno disce omnes." From that one meeting learn the character of the whole. But the Orangemen have met hundreds 'of time* with music, with banners, and mind, gentlemen, with arras, which they well knew how to use, for they were often tr'ed for using them-(Laughter) -and then only for the riot, not because it was asserted they had no tight to meet, or that such meetings were illegal, for such was never asserted; and when they did wish to put them down, they had to get an Act of Parliament to empower them to say so. Well. Lord Stanlay put them down with a strong and a tight hand, and the only objection which was made by one of the present Judges on our bench was, that he did not think the law went far enough, and put down all meetings of the descrip tion which were then under debate. Mr. Lefroy, who now SO ably administers justice in au inferior Court, resisted wits great ability the passing of that Bill. There were also two other persons who resisted it, both of whom are at present traversers at the bar. One of them was Mr. O'Connell and the other was his son. They resisted it on constitutional grounds, and eloquently, ably, and constitutionally they argued the case, even though it took power from their enemies to injure them. He told them that the spirit of the Orangemen could not be put down ; it might be properly directed, but it could not thus be repressed. The Association was not obnoxious to the charges m the in dictment. Its object was, not to diminish the prerogative of the Crown, but to extend it-not to subvert the throne or the House of Peers, but to add to the strength of the one, and to re store the other, and to bring back to Ireland the House of Cont.- mons, whose absence they deplored. If the jury were to judge fairly, they should place themselves in the situation of the ti versers, and then, he would confidently ask them, would they adopt different means to effect their object ? The fact was, that the people had found out the secret of their strength, that what wasdenied tojustice was conceded tomoral force. The history of Ireland for the last century almost was but a series of Associations like the present. After adverting to a numbet of cases in favour of the traversers, the Learned Counsel thus coo. eluded-A large proportion of our countrymen were unhappy, die. contented, and despicable. They looked around on the cause of their misfortunes-they beheld a country blessed by Pro. vidence with the means of greatness, and strong men pinilig for a daily sixpence, starving with gaunt famine in the midst of fertility, and they uttered the language of indignation and remonstrance. If, under such circumstances as these, a man thought a native Parliament would give him the means of life, was he criminal to wish for the means of life? %I as he seditious if he said so? And if he, knowing that lis single voice would be passed by unheeded as the idle wind, joined with other men in declaring their common wanes, grievances, and sufferings, were they conspirators? Were they conspirators because they thought a local Parliament might, perhaps, give them those blessings for which they nos sighed. They thought, perhaps, the resident aristocracy ail gentry were the source of industry and the means of weals,.. They said that the mischief of absenteeism was daily an hourly increasing. They thought perchance a native Patin - ment might induce the absentees to return. Were they con spirators because they said so ?-They knew, and true it was, that the beauties of Ireland were few ; she had little to indue• gentry or nobility to return. What were her beauties con - pared with the fascinations of the Imperial Senate, or the gli tering splendour of a Court? They believed that their country's wealth was daily and hourly diminishing ; beim then they saw a gloomy prospect and little hope ; they transferred their eye to this metropolis in which we stand ; they see what an acute and sensitive people cannot shut their eyes to ; they see the houses of the nobility turned into barracks, the Stamp-office extinguished, the Linen-hall deserted, the University forsaken, the Custom-house almost a poor-house, and not long since they had read a debate in Par liament to remove from their asylum the old Irish pensioners, who bravely served their country, to transplant them in th .ir old age in another country, for the purpose of saving a miser able pittance. They saw every possible source of expenditure withdrawn from the country by the application of polite. II economy and the unbending principles of imperial centrali e tion. They looked at their parliament house converted it, o a bank. In their eyes it stood a monument of past glory and present degradation. The glorious labours of our gitt4 countrymen within those walls were not forgotten. Tito works of the understanding did not easily perish. The ver -as of Homer livel 2,500 years, without the loss of a sin; 'er letter, while temples and cities had been swept away ; and t• • even now read without emotion the exalted sentiments her ie• spired sons poured forth in their exquisite language to save t • expiring liberties of their country. Perhaps their genius I I - a resurrectionary power. and in later days quickened a dog . nerate posterity from the lethargy of slavery into the active y of freedom. We, too, had among us in better times, many who approached the greatness of antiquity. The imperishabia records of their eloquence would keep alive in our hearts a zeal for freedom, and a love for our country. The comprehenti,• genius of Flood, the immortal eloquence of Grattan, the sple, . dour of Burke, the noble simplicity and Demosthenic eloquen, of Plunket and of Curran, had failed to save the ancient con. stitution of Ireland! Had learning, genius, eloquence, w their power over the souls 01 men ? With one great exee,s.. lion, these distinguished countrymen had passed away, List their memorials had not perished with them. Their name, would be remembered by a grateful posterity, while genius w as honoured or patriotism remembered. Those who dosir sd the repeal of the union believed that the Imperial Parliament did not attend sufficiently to our peculiar wants. Our character was misunderstood, and sometimes slanderc4. Our vices were magnified into crimes, and the crimes of • few were visited upon the nation. The Irish—the mere Irish—had been treated as creatures of impulse—men with out settled understandings, without a rational power, OP moral sense. They had their faults, God knows, and and he (Mr. Whiteside) grieved to say it, but their faults were redeemed by splendid virtues. They had rushed into this agi , a. tion with ardour. It was their very nature where they fell strongly to act boldly, and speak passionately—ascribe these excesses to their enthusiasm, and forgive ! Recollect that t h i same enthusiasm had borne them triumphantly over fields of peril and glory—had impelled them to shed their dearest blow, and spend their lives, in defence of the liberties of Englanr4 Nor is their high spirit useful only in the storm of battle ; cheers their almost broken heart under their misery—it sweetens the bitter cup of poverty, which thousands of your countrymen are admitted to feel. The emanations of genius, the imperishable works of art, and the labours of heroes, a the attachment of patriots, have all been prompted by entlin. siasm. The deep passions of the soul are sometimes summoned into action for great and noble purposes, and are awakened by the hand of Omnipotence, by whose touch this island fi. - st started into existence—that hand which has stamped upoil this bold people the enthusiastic desire for the regeneration of Ireland. The Learned Counsel here, overpowered by exertion, sank into his seat, amid loud and continued applause. Mr. Moo RE, Q. C.—My Lord, he is exceedingly exhausted. Mr. HENN, Q.C.--He has not concluded, my Lord. CHIEF JUSTICE—We will not consider him to have done s >` The Court was then adjourned to ten o'clock to-mono morning. [ADVERTISEMENT.] THREE SUPPLEMENTS GRATIS, WITH THE "DISPATCH." GREAT NATIONAL TRIAL AT DUBLIN. The immense size of THE WEEKLY DISPATCH has, hitherto, enabled its Proprietors on all occasions to presents a copious, and, at the same time, interesting account of the eves.to of each week. It is, however, now found utterly impossible t• give anything like a faithful report of the Trial of Mr. O'Con nell and his Repeal associates, without excluding a great mass of interesting domestic and foreign intelligence ; the Proprietors, therefore, feel that their journal, which has been for years, +.nd is new, honoured with more patronage than any other in f a istenee, should be, in all respects, complete; and, with that view, they intend to insert a summary of the proceedings during the progress of the trial in their usual columns, and present to their friends and subscribers THREE SUPPLEMENTS, GRATIS, Which will be published in the following order, viz. : Columns. The first on SUNDAY NEXT, February 4, containing Mr. Sheil's speech, which may be 16 onsidered the gem of oratory The second, the FULL SIZE of thel WEEKLY DISPATCH, on the Sunday suc ceeding the delivery of the Verdict, containing the Speeches of Mr. O'Connell, Sir C. O'Logh in, the Attorney-General, and other leading L Counsel; together with the Summing up of the r: " Judge, the Verdict of the Jury, and other matters of importance that may arise up to the latest hour, for which the services of several short-hand writers of eminence have been engaged The third on the Sunday following (also of thel full size of THE WEEKLY DISPATCH) which will form the early portion of the trial, and embrace the proceedings from the commence ment to that stage at which the first begins,. so that every subscriber to THE WEEKLY 45 DISPATCH will be in possession of a com plete and faithful report of this great national trial—a trial which must become a matter of history, and ever be regarded as an event of no ordinary importance in after time 112 A BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF MR. O'CON. NELL will precede the account of the Trial, which a'll be written by a gentleman intimately acquainted with the " great Agitator; ani consequently one who has treasured ue many reminiscences that will render the Biography a paper 4 general and absorbing interest. The Three Supplements, forming One Hundred and Twelr Columns, will be printed uniformly with THE DISPATCHI and contain a quantity of matter equal to at least an war volume of 600 pages. nun i‘ i i b O er ßT ot those Deaths ca f u r s o e m d b s y c a i r : e t u i n u a i oli: .b a 29, as compared with the pr o -1,011, showing a decrease of ro d ti g s. j — anu T ary he 27 ,o l :a is i vious week, and an increase over the average of the last five winters of 65. The increase has taken place chiefly in deaths (inflammation of the lungs) being 109, while the average IS only 91. Deaths from small-pox are 18, and of those carried ( L lea T t Y hs d l u N rin T g l I t s lie llEl wee: ° en o e ff au l s 2 ed •ha b d y n di ot se b as ee es n o \ f- ac t c h i e na lu te n 7l. , - , being 17 above the average, and violent deaths, 14 or 11 few ar than usual. Of these 4 are from falls, 4 from burns, 1 from suicide. a n d