The Sun. — London, England, 1836-07-29 00:00:00

40 Majorit y —4l IRISH TITHE BILL. Cn the motion of the CHANCELLOR of the EX CHEQUER, the Lords' amendments to the Irish Tithe 13ill were ordered to be taken into consideration on Tuesday next. CHARITABLE TRUSTS BILL. Mr. V. SMITH moved the Order of the Day for the further consideration of the report on the Charitable Trusts Colonel SIBTHORP would move that the report be taken into further consideration that day threw maths. The House divided— For the original motion ... Bl For the amendment 36 Majority 45 On the re t urn of strangers to the g a ll e ry, The S OLICITOR-GENERAL was proposing a new clause, to be added to the Bill. The clause was not heard in the gallery. Mr. CHARLTON wished to know what the effect of t his Bill, as now proposed to be amendel, would be in eases in which, after-provision having been made for the original bequest, there still remained a considerable sur plus ? He knew a place in which this would be the case. He wished to know whether the trustees would be at liberty to apply the surplus to town purposes ? The SOLICITOR -GENERAL said the Bill made no change in the existing law as to the application of such trust j funds. Mr. CHARLTON was proceeding to make some ob servations on the Bill, when he was interrupted by cries of " Order," and " Spoke, spoke." He contended that he made no speech. He merely asked a question, and, as a (CMember of that House, he claimed a right to be heard.— ries of " Order," and " Chair, chair.") The SPEAKER said that the Hon. Member had made a speech, and, in strict order, had no right to be heard again. --(Hear, hear.) Mr. CHARLTON only asked a que s ti on , w hi c h h e in tended t o h ave followed 'up with, some observation s .— (Lud cr i es of Order, order, " and " Chair.") Th e H on . Member persisted in maintaining his right to be heard, when an Hon. Member, as we understood, cried out, " it is disgraceful." The House was now in a state of much confusion. Mr. CHARLTON—If the Hon. Member for Chester inte rrupts me by suc h cr i es, b y saying I have done anything disgraceful in maintaining my right, I will make him re member it.—(Cries of " Order," and great confusion.) An HON. MEMBER denied that the words imputed to the Member for Chester were uttered by him. Mr. CHARLTON—If the Member for Chester has not used the words I beg his pardon for any offensive ex pression I may have used towards him, and I readily re tract it —( Hear, hear.) The SPEAKER—If the lion. Member made use of language inconsistent with order he had no doubt that he Would readily and willingly retract it. Mr. CHARLTON—I have done so in the most hand is some and ready way ; but, if I have a right to be heard, it not one, or ten, or twenty of the Hon. Gentlemen oppo site that shall put me down.—(Cries of " Chair, chair.") The SPEAKER said that, in strict right, the Hon. Member, having made a speech, had no right to be heard a second time. Mr. CHARLTON proceeded. There was a property to the amount of between 1001. and 2001. left in the time of Edward VI., for the maintenance of a school and the payment of a stipend to a clergyman in the town he had the honour of representing. That property had since increased in value to the amount of 1,4001. or 1,5004 The school increased, the minister received his stipend, but there was still a surplus of 700/. Now this surplus, from the want of sufficient clearness in the language of the charter, was de voted by the Corporation to town improvements. The mo ment, however, it was understood that the charter did not admit of such application of the surplus, it ceased to be so applied. Now, he wished to know how this surplus of 7 00/. was to be applied under the present Bill. The ATTORNEY -GENERAL said the Hon. Mem ber was most perspicuous in his statement of the case.— (A laugh.) If it should appear from the charter that any , B ur Plus arising was to be applied to the increase of alms -"(4lses,, the enlargement of the school, or to the stipend of t ,fte clergyman, it would be so applied ; and if the Corpora tTn had right, under the charter, to di s p ose o f t h e sur tiPius for no town purposes, this Bill would not conf er suc h a ght on them- In these respects it made no change in the 1 , 1 14 '.. YOUNG said the answer of the Attorney-Gene -111,n1ht be perspicuous, but it was not satisfactory. to hao,rd,ROWICK said the Hon. Member did not appear e v ,ked attentively into the Bill. L ord DUNG read the Bill with the greatest attention. a 4, .10VVICK said, the Hon. Member might have re the attentively ; but he did not appear to have the amended clauses. Air' YOUNG confessed he had not. Is T he clau se was agreed to. *.41. • T. GLADSTONE then moved the insertion of a "so to th e e ff ect that where there may have been special bequests to the uses of the Established Church such pro perty shall not be at the disposal of trustees not of the stablished Church. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER opposed 'Be clau se . It sought to cast a reproach on the body of Cor- Porators on the score of a difference of religious faith, con ttrary to those principles of toleration which were the ~und ation of our religious syst em . H e di d not see why the e new Corporations should b e more m i strusted than old. rstSir:lt. INGLIS said that the pr o p osa l to a l ter did nogfi come from his side of the House. All that they Wished was, as this Bill proposed to make a decided al teration in the system, to secure the distribution of charita ble f unds,, acco r di ng to t h e w i s h es o f t h e testators. ' r . A. TREVOR was sure that every Member of the Established Church must be obliged to his Hon . F r i en d f or brio g i ng forward this clause. thMr. V. SMITH objected to the clause proposed by aee Ro n . M em b er for Leicester. The more specific the quest the less d anger wou ld ex i st to t h e Ch urch. It was mistak e to suppose that this Bill would take such trusts out of the juris.dietio n of the Courts of Equity. Mr. HALFORD said that if there was one principle More than another by which they should abide,it was that of ke • ?ping trusts to the specific objects for which they were nr 'g i ,nally int en d e d . He, therefore, hoed the House Would agr ee to these clauses. p 4 . Mr. POTTE R said lie could n o t a ll ow th e o b serve - Ll°us of the Hon. Gentleman, the Member for Leicester, to Pass unnoticed. The on. Ga said he would obj ect to trust to the H Socinian tender me h rci d es of the i n ia l,'" of Lei cester, and not allow him to have any share th_tfie management of the Charity he had brought under notice of the House. The Hon. Member must be aw are th at t h e term Socinian was used as one of reproach to e U nitarians. lie (Mr. Potter) belonged to iat sect, a nd this fle s was no t t h e fi rst time its members had th been re ,ec et ed Upo n an d rev i led in that House—lie had on former i a r s jeus, as lie would on t hi s, protest against such conduct. laatHear.) F ew re li g i ous societies were so much misrepre ,i!ed, and if this were the prope r place for discussion, ;tiewas re a d y to defend their principles, and to prove that reli g i ous opinions of the Unitarians were founded in the and i n accordance with Scripture. Ile had lon g h a d 24 lie pleasure of knowing the present Mayor of L e i ces t er , n e man, whether in his public or private capacity, was u°re respected in that town. He had the strictest reliance !ru4 his integrity, and felt conv i nce d that if any charitable sts came micier his management, he would execute them to accord ance w i th the will of donor, and as faithfully as th e most zealous Churchman. The Bon. Gentleman the ember for Northampton, had so comp l ete l y answered the arguments of tr ouble the the Hon. M em b er, t h at he would not further House. 13 After some further observations from Mr. Hardy, Dr. liv 9wr ingy Mr. B a i nes, M r. Handley, Mr. Goulburn, and . P. Gladstone, T he House divided, when the numbers were For the clause 35 Against it , . 82 Majority ' 47 b7Mr. SOLICITOR-GENER AL, in the absence of * T. D'Evneourt, moved that the school of Louth be "At within the provision of the Bill. Li Colonel SIBTHO RP opposed the motion, on the ground 'flat the charter of the school was antecedent to the creation of th e corporation. Mr, GOULBURN followed in the same strain. Lor d J. RUSSELL supported the clause. _. Afte r a long and inaudible conversation, the House di- For the c1au5e................ ... 65 Against it .......... 7 ......... 33 Majority ...... , A nother division tl.en took place, that the Report be or o ught Up that day six months, when there appeared— AFor the motion gainst it ...... Maj, , rity air. TR . . 0 n another amendment 0:1 the Aird claus e , mess es, EV OR propo se d that, foil4.wYing the wo r d b ur - The House sjmuld be the words " and fr `men e." Nes ................... ... ................... : ..... 2 , i.. 1 ....................... , ...... J.) Alajority against the amendment „, —34 coiwakftteinar some further conversation the Bill was read a se- G eece, to insist on taking 6ifferent course. H e wou ld, ALEHOUSES AND VICTUALLING HOUSES Lord PAL MERSTON against the ant ndmenf. BILL. replied. The Rerort on this Bill was bt up. After a f ew words from Mr. G. PRICE, the Gallery O n the quesfon that it be read a second time, Was clear e d f or a division, when th e num b ers were— Colonel SIBTHORP moved that the House do now kFor the resolution a . mt it ...... • " 4 ! And, like Marceau, his fate was lanmmeeennkteeopd,et,rahninid wheisptm;- -110110Ufga by friends And foes, because, like him, eThis B°7le!Qtr''llletia Chita of M. .11.1inister of France. No • 0 to Court prefer athileonafor is er ns;w fo to rth it o B ne He preferred the hostility of a cor rupt fortune. i eM n d e i. i t i i t n , Tg i l f iti l le : r e es c N' ould exchange his principles for power and doubTt The e o w th h e ite l n a e t s t s er oi t he path was _ n fa a v ll ati o r c . cas T ioi l i l s e to maintain the freedom of the Press against its most im rntoipbtleasnpdirittyr,avintiiiiic,avlbiGebovbeensitmoeoicitt placable enemy, who will never forgive the service which that great engine of opinion did him, in raising him to throne,areflects imperishable h onour upon the memory , whose genius a n d i nte lli gence that Press was raised in the estimation of th e i nte ll ectual world. ,f the tllan Opposed as we are to the political opinions which M. Carrel advocated, we but perform a mournful duty in repaying a portion of the debt of gratitude which the free Press of every country owes to the exertions of its fearless and incorruptible champion, Who can won der that the leaders of opposite parties followed, with unaffected sorrow the bier of such a man, and that Chateaubriand and Beranger mingled their tears upon his urn ! But we cannot glance at the last sad cere monial without experiencing another regret than what departed aris upon a c tu a r r e rc ir was a v s e ay el t o l s ia c t r iV e r n : Republican upon the Roman model We must qualify e s fro l in i t s u e e e . i seeing Wheng‘z that praise by observing that piety was a distinguishing characteristic of the Roman patriot. The forum of public debate, and even the field of martial glory, were less sacred in his eyes than the temples of the gods. In error he worshipped ; but he worshipped with sin cerity. The light which unassisted nature gave him he followed, for want of a better ; and an humble de pendence upon, and a profound veneration for, an overruling Providence, was inseparably associated with the valour and the energies which gave Rome the dominion of the world. But, modern France ! what shall we say of it, when we find that, to be thought enlightened, it is necessary to cast off all re gard for religion ; and, to be supposed free, one must become emancipated from the influence of Christianity. We would fain believe that what the injudicious friends of M. Carrel called his " dying injunction," was but the expression of that delirium which clouded his in tellect for some time before it had fled for ever. We would fain believe and hope that the words " no priest —no Church," were the emanation of that disorder of the mind, whose bewildered fancies he himself, in a lucid moment, spoke of as the cegri somnia. A tri umph over Christianity would be a lamentable triumph for " young France." To dispose of the remains of man, as of those of the " beast that perisheth," will not raise -either the intellectual or moral character of a civilised country. Nor will life have more enjoyment, because religion is forbidden to suspend the lamp of immortality amid the gloom of the grave !—.ll/Ornang Herald. It be seen by our Pailiamcntary report, that the Irish Church Bill as amended in Committee, was read a third time and passed in the House of Lords last night, without debating or dividing. Little, if any thing, it must be conf esse d, remained to b e said on the i b , subject ; and we are not at all surprised that the Minis terial party should have carefully awarded an exposi tion of the weakness of their whole number, by a divi sion on a stage of the measure at which they must have availed themselves of the votes of their absent supporters, as well as of those generally present—the rani nantes. It remains now to be seen what course the House of Commons will pursue with regard to the measure. In the mean time, we congratulate all real friend s of the country and of the Constitution on the triumphant return of a Conservative for Newcastle. We announced this gratifying circumstance in part of our impression yesterday ; and in repeating it today we are enabl e d to present our readers with the excellent speech delivered by Mr. Hodgson, the successful can didate, on his nomination. It is a clear, comprehen sive, and candid representation of the actual state of political parties, and of the nature of the principal questions on which they are at this moment divided. The reception this address met with from the consti tuency of Newcastle would of itself afford a striking proof that the degraded condition of the Government is at length accurately understood, and that the dis graceful courses which have reduced the "pure old Whigs" to the necessity of fawning upon a revolu tionary and anti-national faction are properly appre ciated by the people. But the result of the elec tion, and the specific grounds upon which the two candidates rested their claims to support, remove all possibility of cavil on the subject, and must, we think, convince even Lord Melbourne that he was labouring under a delusion when he flatteied himself, so lately as Monday last, that the country will support him and . .his colleagues in the spoliation of the Irish Church. The Whi:g•-Radicals and the Radicals proper of Newcastle coalesced for the purpose of supporting a Captain Blackett, on the condition that the Captain would pledge himself to vote for the Ministerial scheme for spoliating the Irish Church. The Captain being, like ,Mr. Gisborne's friend in the other Beggars' Opera, " a b o ld man ," took the pledge. On the ot h er hand, the Conservatives invited Mr. Hodgson to oppose the Captain, calling upon Mr. Hodgson to pledge himself to resist that Hoekley-in-the-Hole scheme which the Captain was enlisted to support. Mr. Hodgson readily gave the pledge, and, withonly one clear day's canvass, entered upon the race against the Captain, though the latter had the advantage of a very long start. Thus, then, the' constituency of Newcastle were divided —like an assembly that aliall be nameless—into anti-Papists and antiaProtestants ; the watchwords of the respective parties hieing , more over, the same—namely cc appropri a ti on ," and " 710- appropriation," The anti-Papists —the no-9propria tionists, beat their antagonists, th© anti-Protestant appropriators, by a majority of 48, the numbers being 1,576 to 1,528 Now, was this a fair test of public opinion on this subject, or was it not ? If not, we should be glad to hear why not ; and if it was, what can be more plain than that if certain members of the assembly to which we have alluded persist in the votes they have recently given, they will assuredly be re. lieved from the functions at present imposed upon them as soon as the constituent body shall 1. 4 e affbrded the opportunity of disburdening them thereof. There are other points connected with this election, which the :Misters and their supporters would do well to reflect upon. Mr. Hodgson, at his nomination, de clared—before a single vote was recorded in his fa vour—that, had he been in the House of CommoeL , he would have voted for the extinction of 02,, I r i s h Corporations, and not for the Minist'Lr . ial Municipal Bill. "lam of opinion," said Mr. Hodgson, " that the state of Ireland is not Nil - alit' to the state of Eng land, and that, consequently, a measure similar to those puked for England and Scotland would not work with safety or efficiency in Ireland," Tl sense i us was speaking out with equ a l frankness amid good , sense n condemna tion of the other t greaboon"for Ireland, which the Ministers pretend to persuade themselves the English people are prepared to seal with their approbation. And yet Mr. Hodgson was returned by the consti tuency'of Newcastle, among whom, at the last elec tion, he could obtain only 807 votes, while, on the present occasion, he polled, 1,576 plumpers, in oppo sition to a Government candidate, backed by the sup port of the Radicals ; and hi spit© of the preaching of the Big Beggarman, who, when upon his Ministerial mission of mischief last year, was feasted at Newcastle, and, teproaehin g the people of that town with having returned Sir M. W. Ridley, urged them to get rid of hitn, and send another Member like Mr. Ord ! Times. JOURiNz- PRERO IllOt ) • GATIVE COURT. TORRE AND OTHERS v. CASTLE AND OTHERS. The deceased in this case is the late Earl of Scarborough. who died on the 24th of February, 1835, in consequence of a fall from his horse. The circumstance s of the case have been before the public' on more than one occasion. Sir H. JENNER gave judgment. family an d t estamentary H aving detailed the as histo r y of the deceased, t h e Leane Judge s a id th at t hi s ce almost solely depended upon 'the d character to be attributed to the paper propounded. If it were to ho considered as a mere initiatory paper it would require the strongest and most stringent evidence to sup port it. But he was inclined to look upon this as an in strument of a more finished character; the deceased had himself at its conclusion described it as more than a mere initiatory document. He had described it--..‘ Thi s i s m y last will and testament," and signed it " This How could the Court. reject that description of the paper is How could it be called upon to pronounce that as mere heads of instructions which was called by the testator his will ? The Court had no hesitation in deelarino. its con viction th a t th e d eceased intended the paper, to have effect after his death, provided no snob formal paper should be executed, and that being its opiniP'd it must pronouneo 11,-: the validity of th© will, and fi l l " v , a l i" te the vi ' l . ) . of the deceased. He sl7,ould also decree probate of it as h f ur. •-ifrOet Lie cost:s of all ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. NORFOLK CIRCUIT.. ---C4MBRIDGE, JULY 26. WAGSTAFF V. BRUERE AND OTHERS. This was the first of two actions brought by the present plaintiffs, Mary Ann Wagstaff and her sister, Elizabeth Godfrey Wagstaff, against Mr. Bruere Leadbitter, the London officer, and Fairs, one of the police of this borough, to recover damages for certain trespasses and assaults ; but in fact the question raised between the parties was whether a certain female child was the offspring of a marriage be tween the principal defendant and Harriet, the sister of the plaintiffs, or the illegitimate child of the said Elizabeth Godfrey Wagstaff. Mr. KxLLY stated the case. Elizabeth Godfrey Wagstaff--I live at Chesterton, near Cambridge. My father has been dead some years. e was an uph o l s t erer i n Cambridge, and my brother Charl H es carried on his business after his death. I have two bro thers and four sisters, of which latter I am the eldest. The defendant Bruere, who was at Jesus College, married my sis ter on the 6th of May, 1826. I went to town with her, and they ran away from town to Gretna Green shortly after. In October Mr. and Mrs. Bruere came to Cambridge, and their first child was born on the 30th of May, 1827. That was a girl ; since then they have had a boy and another girl, Before their first child was born, I had become acquainted with a gentleman named Smith, of Trinity College, :lad the re sult of my acquaintance with him was a female child, born January 6, 1827. I told my sister Mary Anne (the pre sent plaintiff), Mrs. Bruere, and Mrs. Smith. My brothers treated me very ill in consequence of my pregnancy, with which they were well acquainted, and at their request Mr. Farish, a surgeon, examined me. At that time I had an aunt, Mrs. Wagstaff, living in Sidney-street, and when the child was about to be born I went with Mary A her house to b e d e li vered, and Mr. Farish attended me nn . e to I left Mr. Bruere's house, where I was living at the time, about one or two o'clock in the day. The child was born about five, and I returned in the evening in a coach with Mary Anne and Mr. Farish, I was then put to bed, and re mained there about a week. I left my child under the care of my aunt, and did not see it for nearly two months, when I saw it at my aunt's, where it was brought for m e saw a to see by one M rs. Morley. I it fter that f rom t i me to time, an d though it was not in my aunt's house. I consi dered it was under her care. I was in Cann }, dridge when my sister's child was born in May. in. October Bruere came to Cambridge, and was not on •,..iendly terms with his wife. He was then living in CoP,ege. Mrs. Bruere lived with her brothers and two Ynnger sisters. Bruere did not come to see his wife diree`:ly after his return. I remember his coming one evenieg jn Feb.,1828, in disguise. He asked to see me, and Was shown into the drawing-room, where I saw him W hmy sister Mary Anne. He asked whether I bad not a child, and what its sex was ? I told him, " Yes," in confidence. He said, " I could make him happy VI would acquiesce in what he 'Wished." I asked him " What he meant ?" He said, " His child, Harriet, was provided for by a certain great man, and, in consequence, she required a superior education, which my sister could not give her, and he hoped I would agree to an exchange of children." I said I would comply with his request if lie would consent to be friendly with my sister again, and it would tend to his happiness. He then went up stairs to my sister's bed room, and .returned to the drawing-room. He said the child caused great unhappiness between them, and his fa mily wished to bring it up according to its expectations, and that he had wished her to wean the child, during which time the exchange would be better effected. The next day my sister's child was consigned to my care for that purpose, and in the course of a few evenings my child was brought, by my aunt, as appointed by my brother-in-law. Mr. Bruere came at the same time, and a Mr. Curtis. My aunt, Mary Ann, and myself were also there, and when Mr. Bruere went he took his own child away in his arms. I have never seen it since. My child cried so much Mrs. Bruere wished to see it the fol lowing day, and Mr. Bruere took it to her. It was at night in her own bedroom. She said she would not believe it was hers. Mr. Bruere asked, " Why not ?" and she said it seemed to be larger than hers. He said, it was " the crying and the weaning which had swollen its face," and endeavoured to persuade her. At the time of the change she was nursing her own child. In a few days they went to town, taking the child with them which she had then, taken to nurse. It was returned to me in three WC;;IZS, during which time it had been nursed, and remain e d till November, when it went into Northamptons4ire with them, then to Boulogne, where I next saw it, anti. after wards to London and to Hampshire, where we all went. We called the child Amy. In 1830, in N, Ma Anne, Em ma , A my, and myself returned to e C b am er bridge, ry and Mr. and Mrs. Bruere joined u at Christmas, and re mained till June or July. Ir. July, 1832, I was dange rously ill, and sent for the child to see it, expecting I was going t o di e . She remained till November, and then went to *mut with Emili a , who bad brought her, and in Nialvh, 1834, she was brought to me at Chesterton, and lived with us till the time of the assault, when she was taken away. I have always clothed her out of my own income, which is 50/. I should not know Mrs. Bruere's child if I were to see it now. Mr. Bruere has been in the Fleet for three years up to January or February last. During 1835 he had a quarrel with his wife, in consequence of his disclosing the secret of the exchange to her. It was last October. I learnt it from her treatment of me, when I went to see her at the time of her illness. She said I had been a wretch of a sister to her for exchanging her child, and she would never see or speak to me again, and turned me out. Dur ing the time I lived with them, they used to quarrel very often and vorywspverely.—[Here the witness went into a detail of the breaking open of the house in which she tte.a sister lived at Chesterton, by the defendants, with great force and 1. iolence personally to herself and her seeing ; of their going to the Hoop Inn, for the purpo, of seeing the Mayor ; and of the manner in which the child was forced from herself and her sister, by Mr. Bruere and the two constables ; she (Amy) at tlle time was crying, and saying to the witnT.ss4" Prays dear mamma, submit." Eventually the child eras taken away, and she bad never since been se.':in by her.] After further evidence for the prosecution had been heard, the ATTORNEY_GENERAL began his address to the jury by putting it to th em to say what motive his client. eould possibly have for such conduct as detailed by Miss Wagstaff, and the array of witnesses produced to support her in her story, which he called on them to reject, its only ground of belief being its utter impossibility. He then pro ceeded to criticise the evidence of Miss Wagstaff, and pointed out its extraordinary inconsistencies, and the absur dity of end eavour i ng to persuade twelve gentlemen, and fathers p er h aps, t h at a mother could have been so fooled as to receive an d t a k e to her breast a child five months older than her own, instead of indignantly refusing to acknowledge the spurious babe for one instant. The plaintiff was nonsuited. The cause excited the greatest interest, the Courts having been crowded to suffocation. NORTHERN CIRCUIT.—DuRium, JUL' 26. THE KING ON THE PROSECUTION OF GEORGE TOWNSHEND FOX, V. JOHN HARDINGE VEITCH, FOR A LIBEL. The prosecutor is a Magistrate of the county of Durhm. The def en d an t i s p ro prietor o f the _Durham Chronicle, a a nd th e lib e l i n question was published in that paper on the 7th of November last, Mr. GRA/N oma Cu for ssw the defenceELL appeared f or t h e prosecution, and Mr. The Jury, after a consultation nine o of t en h ours, were, at come to a verdict. 'clock in the evening, discharged, b e i ng una b le to Mr. Carr and Mr. .Kirk a ld y one of sending, an d the otbr cr . yeste r d a y, convicted the to-day sente nce d to - carrying, a challen ge , were ..ree months' imprisonment. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS. The number of appeals and petitions are sixteen ; but the greater part of the day was occupied in hearing the appeals of John Parker, Thomas Curry, and Lewis Hum phreys, against convictions by William John Broderip and William Ballantine, Esqrs, for endeavouring to force John Rawkin to depart from his employment with John Sea ward, Samuel Seaward, and James D. Capel, as an engi neer. The convictions were affirmed, with costs. Thomas Curry and Lewis Humphreys also appealed against convictions of the same parties for molesting Ran- TIIE SL I„ SPIRIT OF T The House then divided, when the numbers were— For the adjournment 5 Against it . ...... 47 Majority -42 The Bill was then read a second time. The others Orders of the Day were then disposed of, and the House adjourned at Half-past Two o'Clock. ROUSE OF LORDS, JULY 28. ROYAL ASSENT. The LORD CHANCELLOR, the Earl of SHAFTESBURY, and Viscount DIJNCANNON took their seats at Five o'clock, for the purpose of giving the Royal Assent by Commission to several Bills. The Yeoman Usher of the Black Rod having been di rected to summon the House of Commons for that purpose, the Speaker, attended by several Members, shortly after wards appeared at the Bar, when the Royal assent was given in the usual form to the following Bills : The Post-Horse Duties Bill, the Insolvent Debtors (England) Bill, Insolvent Debtors (India) Bill, Sale of Bread Bill, Heirs of Entail (Scotland) Bill, Deeds Ratifi cation (Scotland) Bill, Commissary Court (Edinburgh) Bill, Excise Licences (Ireland) Bill, Arms (Ireland) Bill, Constabulary (Ireland) Bill, Turnpike Roads (Ireland) Bill, Administration of Justice (New South Wales, &c.) Bill, Antigua Indemnity Bill, Judges Chambers Bill, Lon don and Blackwall Commercial Railway Bill, Tremoutha Harbour and Railway Bill, Dover Harbour Bill, Swansea Harbour Bill, Suir Navigation Bill, (No. 2.), Greenwich Pier Bill, South Metropolitan Cemetery Bill, Fisheries (Ireland) Bill, Bernhardt's Patent Bill, Dempster's Estate Bill, Ogilvy's Estate Bill, Dawson's Estate Bill, Dudley Vicarage Estate Bill, Glassford's Estate Bill, Chadwick's Estate Bill, Pilkington's Name Bill ; De Thoren's Natura lization Bill. Mr. BROTHERTON and others from the Commons brought up the Worcester Dean and Chapter Bill. The Earl of SHREWSBURY presented a petition from Viscount Gormanstown, against the Dublin and Drogheda Railway Bill. COAL. The Marquis of LONDONDERRY, in moving that the returns of the quantity of coal imported into London, and the amount of duties levied, be printed, complained that a Bill was now about to be in troduced for the purpose of continuing the tax of eightpence per ton, in order to repair and widen Blackfriars Bridge. It was, he believed, understood on all hands that this tax should cease after the approaches to London Bridge had been completed, and as there was a very general outcry against the high price of this com modity, no less a sum than 180,000/. being paid between the consumer and the seller to the city of London, he felt it his duty to call the attention of his Majesty's Ministers to the subject. ECCLESIASTICAL REVENUES (IRELAND.) The Ecclesiastical Revenues (Ireland) Bill was read a third time and passed. IRISH CHURCH BILL. On the motion of Lord LYNDHURST the Irish Church Bill was read a third time and passed. LIGHT-HOUSES. The Light-houses Bill went through a Committee. CIVIL BILL COURTS (IRELAND). On the motion of the Earl of DEVON, the House went into Committee on the Civil Courts (Ireland) Bill. On clause 3 being read, The Marquis of WESTMEATH moved the omis sion of the word .‘ Protestant," inasmuch as the Clause stating that the notices should be posted upon the doors of the Church was, in itself, sufficient—there being no Estab lished Church but the Protestant Church in Ireland. The Marquis of CLANRICARDE defended the clause. The amendment was agreed to. On clause 57 being read, The Marquis of WESTMEATH moved an amend ment, for the purpose of giving the Lord Lieutenant power to appoint additional places for holding Quarter Sessions. The Marquis of CLANRICARDE and Lord PLUNKETT objected to giving such extraordinary power to the Lord Lieutenant. The Marquis of WESTMEATH would not press his amendment if the sense of the House was against it. Clauses 57, 58, and 59, were struck out. On clause 60 being proposed, Lord CARBERY moved that it also be struck out. The Committee then divided, when the numbers were For the clause Against it 23 Majority —6 The other clauses were then agreed to ; the Bill passed ;hrough Committee, and was reported to the House. The report ordered for to morrow. A Message from the House of Commons brought up the Poole Corporation Bill. Lord STRAFFORD moved the first reading of the Poole Corporation Bill, and gave notice that he should move the second reading on Monday next. The Marquis of DO WNSHIRE brought up the re port on the Dublin and Drogheda Railway Bill, and fixed the third reading for to-morrow. Lord HOLLAND presented a petition from the Dis senters of Stradbroke against the payment of church rates, ROMAN CATHOLICS MARRIAGE BILL. The Marquis of CLANRICARDE gave notice that on Monday he should move the second reading of this Bill, REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS BILL. After some verbal amendments, made at the suggestion of Lord ELLENBOROUGH, the Report was received, and the Bill ordered to be read third time on Monday. MARRIAGES BILL. On the motion of the Bishop of EXETER, this Bill was re-committed. Clauses up to 18, inclusive, were agreed to, with a few verbal amendments. Clause 19 was struck out. Clause 20 was agreed to. Upon Clause 21, The Bishop of EXETER objected to the formula re garding the contract of marriage, which was contained in this clause, and moved the substitution of one to the follow. ing effect :—" In the presence of Almighty God, and of these witnesses, I (N) do take thee (M), according to the ordinances of God, to be my lawful and wedded wife ; and I do hereby promise in the presence of God, and also of these witnesses, to be unto thee a faithful and loving husband, and to keep only unto thee during life." After a short discussion, in which Lords Melbourne, Ellenborough, and Holland opposed, and the Archbishop of Canterbury supported the amendment, the Committee divided on the question, that the words proposed to be left out should stand part of the Bill : Contents l5 Non-contents l9 Majority —4 The Bishop of EXETER then moved that the words he had proposed should be inserted. Viscount MELBOURNE said that the words proposed were so inconsistent with the principle of the Bill, that he trusted at all events the House would not then decide upon them, He should, therefore, move that the House should resume, The Committee then divided : Contents Non-contents Majority The amendment was then agreed to. The other clauses and schedules were then agreed to, and the House resumed. The report was ordered to be received on Monday next. The House then adjourned. -2 It is much to be desired that the same good taste which has been employed in ornamenting and otherwise im proving St. James's and Hyde Parks, would try its hand on the Green Park, which is in a sad, slovenly, and neglected condition. TIIE VIOLIN AND ITS PROFESSORS.—" This is a clever book, on an interesting subject. The author (Mr. Dubourg) is not only a good musician, but a good musical histori an . H e h as h ere b roug h t together all that is known respecting the instrument, and its professors, down to Paganini (of whom there is a very admirably written memoir). A variety of piquant anecdotes are dispersed through the volume, whi c h wi ll, d ou b t l ess, f i nd a place in every musical library." —Sunday Times. A Chinese widow being found fanning the tomb of her deceased husband, and being asked the cause of so singu lar a mode of showing her grief, accounted for it by saying that he had made her promise not to marry again while the mortar of his tomb remained damp; and as it dried but slowly she saw no harm in aiding the operation. On Saturday week, a large hay stack, in Billingbo rough Fen, was entirely destroyed by fire, caused by a man who felt asleep with a lighted pipe in his mouth. —LincolnGazette. Miss L4vDox's NEW WORK, are requested to state 044, Miss Landon's New Work, " Traits sad Trials of Early Life." i n 1 N. neatly bound, price 7s. 6d., was pi,thlithed this day by Mr. COlburn, Oreat Marlborough street; and Kor be had of all Booksellers in the p n4e,d kior dom. The following azft 440 iust published :--" Army tar $ or, Vemale.DNAinatimyT Aie Authoress of " Kethers and Daught,m," i n 4 viols. 2. The Viscount de gil4teavipiand's Sketches of kngfish ligeratnre," in 2 YO4. ;YO• 41-S! " The Diary of a Desennuye, with 4 Peep the Tuileries and St. James's," in 2 vo l s. post fivo. 4, q The jop oe saws pf )iiolin and its Professors, in 1 viol. nevlv bound, 7s. 6d. 5. First Series, !!! ! vol. t e Ist of August will appear, lbws " Sayings and Doi h ngs," with engramtp, fi t s. FK l op with the Magazines, the Mgt, pr i ce :/s . 6 d., o f Captain Brenton's " Naval History of moot hripain,'l yipi fine Portraits of Lords NeJson.and St, Vincent. The Copley Bill for perpetuating the hatred of Irishmen to the anomalous Establishment attached to the Irish Protestant Church, was, upon Lord Lynd hurst's motion, read a third time last night and passed by the Tory Lords. Such of the Ministers as sit in the Upper House offered no remarks upon the Learned Baron's motion. They very properly left in the hands of its parent the management of his abortive bantling. Having already protested, in the strongest terms, against the mutilation of the original beneficial mea sure, it was not necessary for Lord Melbourne to re peat his contempt of the Bill as " amended," or his determination never to be a party, as First Minister of the Crown, to its becoming law in its present mangled form. It now remains for the Representatives of the people to do their duty to the country, and to correct, as far as in them lies, the mischievous effects of irre sponsible power, directed by factious feeling. Tues day, the 2d of August, was last night fixed for taking the amendments made by the Lords into consideration. We have fully prepared absent Members for this, and the country expects that there shall be no mistake.— Morning Chronicle. The Marriage Bill was re-committed last night in the House of Lords, when the Bishop of Exeter moved an amendment to clause 20, to the declaration in which he objected as not setting forth either the re ligious nature of the contract, or its indissolubility. The amendment of the Right Reverend Father in God was to the following effect :—" I, N, declare, in the presence of Almighty God, and before these wit nesses, that I take M to be my lawful wife, to live with according to God's Holy ordinance ; and in the presence of Almighty God and these witnesses, I so lemnly promise to be to her a loving and faithful hus band, and to keep to her during life." On a division on the question that the words proposed to be left out stand part of the Bill, the motion was lost by a majo rity of 19 to 15. Another division took place on a motion of Lord Melbourne, that the House resume, in order that a division might not be come to in so thin a House; the numbers were 15 to 17. After which the amendment of the Bishop was agreed to. There divided against the Bishop, the Duke of Wel lington, the Earl of Ripon, the Earl of Shaftesbury, the Earl of Rosslyn, Lord Ellenborough, and Lord Fitzgerald, &c., so that Lord Melbourne was on the occasion powerfully supported by the Tories. The only spiritual Peer, however, With him was the Bishop of Bristol, while he had six against him, Cork, Lincoln, Gloucester, Oxford, Hereford, and Exeter. Notwithstanding the strong opposition to the amendment as unnecessary, there being already a clause to regulate the religious ceremony, we do not apprehend that it will lead to much inconvenience. We speak, however,• under the due correction, as there may be other religious sects besides the Quakers who may think that calling God to witness a civil contract is taking the name of God in vain. We should suppose, however, that few persons will have any objection to call God to witness the marriage, though the promise to keep to the wife during life may afterwards give pain to an applicant for for relief in case of the misbehaviour of the other party. The law intends, no doubt, that mar riage shall be for life, but this intention is qua lified by the exceptional Bills of Divorce, by which parties are relieved in cases of adultery. —Morning Chronicle. It will be seen from the proceedings of the House of Lords last night, that the Irish Church Bill, mulcted of everything that gave it value in the eyes of the coun try, was, on the motion of Lord Lyndhurst, read a third time and passed. Lord Melbourne maintained grave and dignified silence upon the subject—neither attempting, on the one hand, to bring their Lordships to their senses, nor stooping, on the other, to the useless task of assisting in passing a Bill whose provisions he had disowned, and which the Tories had made their own. In thus conducting himself upon the occasion, his Lordship did equal justice to himself and to those with whom he had to deal. He palpably told their Lord ships by his silence, that so far as he and his Govern ment were concerned, their position, supported by the people, and the people's representatives, was such as to bid defiance to any perverse opposition of which they could be guilty—and that the only party who were cer tain of being damaged by their conduct upon the Irish Church, as well as upon the Irish Municipal, and other Bills, were the persons who had been guilty of it, and who were too deeply steeped in folly to be capable of listening to the suggestions of reason. Some of their Lordships, as we have been informed, are rather in clined to regret the precipitate, unjust and unpopular course which the Belial of their party has pursued but the mass follow him as blindly as the bell-wether is followed by the flock of which he is chief, and dream of nothing but of proving their independence of the Commons, and of common sense. How it will be with them in a few years, it requires not the gift of prophecy to foretell. As the longest day comes at last to an end, so will their Lordships. There is now no preventing of the catastrophe, except by an immediate and thorough repentance, of which they have neither honesty nor boldness to be guilty. The country, in the full enjoyment of a prosperity almost unexampled either in its own, or in the annals, of any other na tion—having no just cause of discontent at home, and no grounds for vexation abroad —may not feel the in sults perpetrated upon it, as it would do under diffe rent circumstances ; but their Tory Lordships may rely upon it as matter of fact, that the jay of reckoning with them is not far distant, and that it requires but the slightest ground of additional provocation to fan the smouldering embers of discontent, of disregard, and of popular hatred, into a flame which will not only consume them, but place in jeopardy institution s more reverenced and more worthy of preservation than their own House of separate judicature and legislation. The Bill—we mean the emasculated anti mangled Irish Church Bill which it has pleased their Lord • ships to pass —was, as will be seen from our Parlia mentary report, returned last night to the House of Commons, where it will be dealt with as it deserves. The discussion is fixed for Tuesday next ; and we need not add that every Reform Member—every lover of his country and of his country's institutions, as well as every true friend to the utility and permanence of the Established Church, is expected to be in his-place and to do his duty. The Tories are mustering all their strength, in the hope—which will prove vain, if the Reform Members do their duty --of overthrowing the Melbourne Cabinet ; and it behoves, in consequence, every one to be at his post who is opposed to a repe tition of the reign of Toryism, however short, on the one hand, or to the perpetration of a gross and per manent injustice upon seven millions of their fellow subjects, on the other. We shall not fail, should there any absentees, to note them down with care, and to expose them with equal zeal to the deserved execra tion of their constituents, and of the country at large. —Morning Advertiser. The fate of Armand Carrel, the victim of a false law of honour, was, indeed, a melancholy one , but though cut off in the prime of life, and in the vigour of his intellect, he did not die too soon for his own fame. His reputation as a political writer was great, and the unsullied integrity of his conduct, as a chin pion of the principles which h e espouse d , exc i te d t h e admiration of his count r y men , even i n an age fu ll o f contrary examples. But he did not engage in poli tics as a trade, or connect himself with p arty as an am bitious speculation. His opinions, whether right or wrong, were the result of an honest conviction, and the fidelity that gave lustre to hi s c h aracter w ill hallow A Republican, ill his tomb. principle, IVI. Carrel is not to be confounded with the vulgar herd of demo. crats and liberals—a eordid and intolerant race, who cover the most selfish designs with the mask of pa triotism, and court a base popularity for the purposes of a impt- ambition. M. Carrel was a Republican upon the 4or9an Ri(le!: Went? hiO , Rillqeti , 49C1 inflexiWe 40eF.Tq10.9!? tic 44q deY'nted to Kilm4 !Le be!ioY4 to k!= the copse of pnbfic virtue and of 4i4 cppYY: HP 44,59 OIP PPI-11:49 believe t)l4e rigl4, 4PC/r OR FP 110fliS 40114ifitP4 th.ngPri 4P(JfICC4 1 1Y P°M)PtiiPii pqr§riori it 4§ one who 41wAy - 4 fell ? thoughli hf}fi itPtPd, unricr the inspiration of a chivalrous Unti incut , „c - .nay say out i-iateu man, as' our Poet, Byron, has said of the ounce a n d h • oroio Marceau, rf, brayp i 4114 triofi9,l l ,, Wqq Ming weer • mcitirncro wore two posts— ;is rrittilsiofoes;" ENGLISH T ,KETCHES OF i4ITERATURE.—A neW work, by so distinguished a writer as Chateaubriantl . Anist always command attention ; and, when the willoCt as in the presvnt instance, comes so directly hwo to :tiglish readers, it is manifest that t1,1 ?F ,,p 14-,.)A64 will k‘kee9, 9Ao evou more i popnitt , . in thk hat than any of his femer eToduotions. 4 4 30:,iy, Q,,,i,c411 of last §,atlkr4V, IA rMewing the ilglis translation 01'. the 441.0 Am wcirik, ob,serves: "It p th PP' 4 , b li, 6. ,,fq.r AR, i l igitol egrOent to, f0,r%11 an aecurate est. 11,t4 Ai - 1-1,44 MP44144141:10, eis tiAc ideal of Frew} , - i l l ,110. c', FRq s ll l .' ic , 1 1 : - q ;11410 wkr to itand--.1- m 41.1 oppowd to eu.— • .[ wort i..l y on.# 3 - • 1, genius ; us of taste often own. His new performance is —cal, a cultivated, and a graceful mind. It u, a variety of information, and resembles a mental diary, rec or d ing the author's impressions as he travelled through our world of p oetry. From many o f the opinions we differ; still they are op i nions we are glad to have considered; they deserve respect, even in dissent. The present is a re markable and i nterest i ng work, of which our limited columns can give but a bird's-7e view." FRIDAY, JULY 29 1836 .Pereet -, ~~ j kin in his employment, ancllforcing hi m to tion. The convictions of the magistrates wer, costs. Yesterday Ann Kent, aged only twelve years, and Frances 21fay, aged sixteen, years. a young lady of highly respectable connexions, residing at Hammersmith, were brought before Messrs. Conn and BARLOW. POliCO sergeant Murphy, T 4, on the previous evening, while passing thu shop of Mr. Aldous, pawnbroker, King-street, Hammertranth, Was informed a young girl had offered seven pairs of white cot. ton stockings in pledge under suspicious circumstances. He accordingly went in, when he found the prisoner ;lent de tained by the shopman, who handed him the stockings pro duced, which she had offered to pledge for 2s. On question. inp,; her she said she had been sent by h.er mottle., but. I.e knowing her, although so young, 10 be air incorrigible thief, she having thrice beer, commit ted b tat Bench f or th e f ts , took her to the shop o f Mr. Masters, a hosier, in the 'Broadway, butlie declared they were not his. Whilei.n. The shop she said she would confess the truth. A: young lady, who was outside, had given her the stock 'rugs to,pawn, and had promised to give her sixpence for so doing." She was then desired to point out the person, and when taken outside pointed out Miss May, who was stand ing among other persons, who had followed them from the pawnbrokers, as the person. Miss May, on hearing the accusation, became much alarmed, and attempted to escape, but he prevented her, and took them both to the station house. He had since'ascertained that the connection of Miss May were highly. respectable, and he believed her to be quite innocent. Miss May, in the most solemn manner, declared her in nocence. She had never seen her fellow-prisoner before she saw her coming out of the pawnbroker's, in the cus tody of the police sergeant, when she followed them from curiosity to learn what offence so youer g a child had com mitted. Kent, however, for some time persisted in her state ment ; but at length she confes , :4ed it was altogether un founded. The Bench said there could be no doubt of May's inno cence, and ordered her to be removed from the bar. Kent was then committed for two months to the House of Correction, as a reputed thief. CE INTELLIGENCE. HATTON-GARDEN. Amelia Sheppard was finally examined, charged with Iray. in; concealed the birth of her child. She was fully committed for trial. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. Jane Hunter, alias Janes, was committed for two months for having, by fraudulent representation, obtained money from Lady George Murray and Lady Kerrison. UNION -HALL. Yesterday Letitia Eagle, a young woman, was charged with leaving her illegitimate child at the door of a gentle man's house in Marlborough -place, Walworth. The Magistrate eventually discharged her, telling her to go to the parish officers again, and state that she had been at this office. She was likewise told that if she deserted the infant again under similar circumstances she would subject herself to the punishment of bein; sent to gaol. r.:*&. : •""Ikt-T p. • ta this situa,-c:•x: n 0 I 1 d KENSINGTON PETTY SESSIONS. COURT CIRCULAR. A Cabinet Council. vvas held yesterday afternoon at the Foreign -office. It Was attended by Viscount Melbotrene, Viscount Duncaunon, Lord John Russell, Viscount PO mer ston, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Sir John Holihouse, Lord Holland, and Viscount Howiek.—The Council sat an hour and a half. M. Tricoupi, the Grecia n Mi n i ster, transacted busiuess yes terday at the Foreign -office. Messrs. Phipps, Magnay, Gaussen, and Dickinson had an interview yesterday with the Chancellor of the Exchequer in Downing - -street. The King's Advocate had an interview with Viscount Mel bourne yesterday in Downing -street. Mr. Colquhoun transacted businm yesterday at the Colo nial-office. The Right Hon. T. FranklAnd Lewis, Chairman of the Poor Law Commission, had interview with Lord John Rus sell yesterday at the Home,office. SPORTIN 'kir' INTELLIGENCE. G 0 ODWOOD RACES, YISTERDAfr. The Cowdray Stkices of 25 sovs . each ; two years, ist. ; and, three Years, 9st. 21b. ; fillies allowed 31b. The winner to ly.: sold for 150, &c. T. Y.C. Mr. J. Day's Foozool, 3 yrs S. ;Day 1 MDuke of Richmond's f. by Mameluke, 2 yrs ......... 0 r. Fox's Doncaster, 2 yrs ... ................. 0 Foozool took the lead at a good pace, vvith Doncaster his quarters, and the filly about a lenge.' behind half a s tancedis from home the trio closed, and 'a most spiendid race en sued, Foozool winning by a head only, and the other two making it a dead heat for second. Foozool the favourite, but no betting worth quoting. His Majesty's Plate of 100 M gu.ineas Three miles an d fi ve f urlongs. r. J. Day's Venison, 4 'yrs, 7st. 41b S. D ay 1 Lord Exeter's Luck's All, 4 yrs, 9st. 21b ... ......... ... 2 4tol on Venison, Luck's All made all the running till within a distance and 'a half from home, where Venison headed him, and won very cleverly by a length. Match, 100, h. ft .. -Duke of Ri c h mon d' s Elizondo, 4 yrs, ‘-.3st. 71b., rec e i ve d fror:, Mr. Brown's Alorpeth, 5 yrs, Bst. 31b. The Goodwood ¶3takes, of 25 sovs. each, 15 ft., and only 5, &e. The second to rerleive 50 sovs. out of the Stakes. The Cup Coarse. MMr. Houldsworth's Felix, 4 yrs, 7st. 81b Chappl o 1 r. Rush's Roadster, aged, 7st. 131 b .........-M......... Tne f o ll ow i ng also started, but were not placed :r.. Theob 2 ald's P.ockingilam, 6 yrs, 9st. 121 b ; Mr. Osbaldeston' s Rush, 5 yrs, Bst. 121 b ; Mr. berth's Knobstick, 5 yrs, Bst. 51b ; Duke of Rich mond's Pussy, 5 yrs, 7st. 121 b ; Lord Chesterfield's Whimsical, 5 yrs, 7st. 71b; Mr. 'robin's Tauntonian, 4 yrs, 7st. 31'o ; Mr. W. Smith's Ruinous, 4 yrs, 6st. 131 b; Duke of Richmond's Tiber, 4 yrs, 6st. 12111; Lord Chesterfield's Alfred, 3 yrs, 6st. 121 b ; Mr. Philli more's_Lady Anna, 3 yrs, 6st. 12Ib ; Duke of Richmond's Sepoy, 3 yrs, 6st. 101 b ; rd Lichfield's Arbaces, 3 yrs, 6stßush's Taglioni, 3 yrs, tist ; Mr. Houldsworth's f. by Eroilius, out of Flush, 3 yrs, sst. 3lb ; Mr. Houldsworth's f. by Yam:ash, out of Fortuna, 3 yrs, sst. 31b. Bettin g to 1 a gs t R oc ki ngham (taker.), sto 1 agst Pussy (taken),'6 to 1 agst Flush, 7 to 1 agst Rush, 20 to 1 agst Whim. sical, 15 to 1 agst Lady Anna, 15 to 1 agst Knobaick, and 15 to 1 agst Felix. Won easy by a length, The Members' Plate of 501., with 501. added by the Ladies. The second horse to receive 101. ',rem the Fund. The winner to be sold for 3501., &e. ; three. yrs old, 7st. 41b. ; four, Bst. 71b ; five,_ 9st; s i x an d aged, 9',t. 41b. Heats, once round. Duke of Richmond's 1 4:lizondo, 4 yrs ... ...... Boyce I 1 Mr. Dawson's Fair Jane, 3 yrs... Lord Chesterfield's Juliana, 4 yrs Won in a canter. 2tol on Elizondo before the first heat, wad 4 to 1 after it. The City Plate of 1001., added to a Sweepstakes of 5 sovs. each. The second horse to receive 10/. out of the Stakes. Heats, one mile. 5 Solis. Duke of Richmond's Mus Mr. Dawsor.'s Fair Jane ... ... 9. 1 and Mr. Forti: L ' s Famine theTthheirfif..shfelaetavit-aws. .. :3 2 Tke; Cup (to-morrow), p.p.-Even on Lord Chesterfield's Horn se, and 2to 1 agst Lord Lichfield's Elis. EF.s is declared to start. a n s ol va o n ver by w when e:l head,r t a h c e c account l n e d f t. b 7-7. a length, Drawing Room Stakes.-The Drumrtier took the lead at a good pa ce , f o ll owe d by Es fourth, and Eli s i n t h e rear; i n th i s order they commenced tners...lda, Sepoy lyin g third, Helga the circuit of the Clumps., Elis, before they disappeared, bay ing headed Sepoy. The Drummer continued his leo.d round the Clumps, and on getting into straight running beat a re treat ; Etis immorriately took up the work with Babel colt at his heels, was hover caught, and won in a canter by three lengths, Babel colt second, Esmeralda three or four lengths next him, Sepoy fourth by about the same distance, and the rest beaten off a long way; in fact Elis had beaten them all. half a mile from home. A disagreement took place after theatter race conceiving more fortunate jockey had k)revented his going up ; the objection was not substantiated, The Nvea ther was beautiful, the sport excellent, and the company nu merous and fashionable. We subjoin a list o 4; the principal visitors :--Duke and Duchess of Richmond, PAike and Duchess of Beaufort, Duke of Portland, Mas and Marchioness of Exeter, Earl and Countess of Wiltono, 'Earl and Countess of Earl and Countess of Uxbrid Chesterfield, Earl of Verulam, Earl 'March, Earl Stradbroke, 'Earl of Lichfield, Earl of Oldenburgh, Count D'Orsay. Scarborough, Earl and Countess,of Albemarle, the Prince of , Lord G. Bentinck, Lord Suf field, Lord Rokeby, Lord Bruce, Lord W. Lennox, Lord John Fitzroy, Lord E. moor and Lady ".aomerset, Lord Villiers, Sir H. Sey- C 6 '..ton, Sir John Shelley, Sir L. Glynn, Sir F. Goodrielv, A. Berkeley, 7 :ion. Captain Rous, Hon. Colonel H. and Mrs. Hon. R. Watson, Hon. G. Byng, lion. Anson, CP'.onel Peel, General and the Misses Crosbie, Mr- P° Pts', Mr. Greville, Mr. Irby, Mr. Etwall, M. P., Mr., Cock'ington, M. P., Mr. D. Radcliffe, Mr. Crosbie, Mr. Cardnor, Mr. Fairlie, Mr. Crommelin, Mr. S. Stanley, Sir. Foulis, Mr. Clive, &c. The above list forms a Slr.all por tion of the fashionables congregated at Chichester, Bognor, Midhurst, and other places within a few miles of the Park. HEREFORD RACES—TVPN.EspAr. The Herefordshire Stakes of 20 sovs. each ; h. ft, with 50 added. from the Fund. Two miles and P. distance. 7 Subs. Mr. E. Griffiths's Rambler, 5 ........................ 1 Mr. Bristow's Languid, 5 yrs .............................. 2 Mr. Palmer's Nell Gwynr...e, 6 yrs ... ..................... 3 Mr. Thorne's ch. g., 4 yrs .......................... The Wye Stakes of 10 sovs. each, with 25 added ; mares and geld ings allowed 31b. Heats, mile and a half. 4 Subs. Mr. Farmer's Timothy, 4 y rs 1 1 Mr. T. Davies's Latona, 5 h 2 dr The Hunters' Stakes (H andicap) of 10 sovs. each, ft, with 20, added, for horses that have been regularly hunted. Heats, two miles and a fristance. 18 Subs. Mr. Ongley's Donnington I 1 Major Rolff's Bessy .............. 2 2 Mr. W. Williams's Charity, 6 yrs Mr. W. L. Elmslie's Boy Blue, 6 yrs 4 4 WARWICK SEPTEMBER RACES. The following are the entries for the Stand Stakes to be rim at these races :—Mr. B. King's Lucy, aged, Bst. 10Th. ; bird Exe te. 41b r's Luc Sir k's All Bt , 4 yrs, B s t. 41b ; L ord Warwick ' s Pelops, 4 yes, ; C. G ; reville's Rival, by Stups, 5 yrs, is. 611 s M Tomes's R an d om, 5 yrs, 7st. 21b ; Mr. Lu m cas's Telltal e t , 3 yes, 6 r. 131 b ; Capt. L am b' s Count d'Orsay, 3 yrs, Est. 71b, st.