The Sun. — London, England, 1803-02-10 00:00:00

eteeter e eebetethe very cer n ellent cheraderwhich, had been given- to the ,Prisoner by',Seeleeetelted persons, was taken into considera,„ tion. He then adeeteei to the ciao of the Gun_ powder Piet, in - wh;eli he said many persons had fallen consequence of the prejedices which had- prevailed against then • z . and he trusted, that no - peeludiee should - be .euff . ered to, opeeete again , ,t Ids unfottenate Client,: He concluded-with expressing his confident hope, that upon, tt, impartial view of the case, the. Jury, would be in, duced to acquit the Prisoner., ,The LORD CHI El , JUSTICE, then asked the Pri_ soner if he wished to make any observations in ad. dition to those which hid been made by his`Coensel. Despard replied, that he was.perfedly eatis_ fled with the exertions which his,Counsel had made ftitehine, and therefore he would not trouble the. Court with any observatiops e she Sot,tcvrox GENERA!. then rose, in reply, we lereene e from the greet. length'of the Trial, that we can only give a short outline ofhis Speech : he said, that in making the observations which his Choy as one of the counsel for the Crown, dulled for item him, he felt considerable anxiety, becapse he had to deliver his sentiments in a COurt, and upon a ;Übjea in which he had not much experience,-- ueis impressed with ,the strongest feelings of the importance of :the present case, but he felt great consolation in the discharge of his duty, whewhe refleded, that he wesaddressing a careful, attentive, and,' intelligent Jury, under the diredion of a Court whiclt vvas pettedly able to give them every infor. merlon that was requisite; would make every obser vation which the nature of the case required, and wtio would supply all the defels that might appear frcim the Bar on either side. He would now pro. teed to make a few observations on what had fallen from the Learned Gentlemen on the other side, and they : ehould be as tcw as the importance of the case would admit, This Triel, although it had occu. pied a great deal of time in the discussion, yet, as it , aprarcd tohim, involved no very intricate ques. tion of Law,• nor contained any difficulty with re sped to the inference, which was to be drawn in point,of fad. The Charge in the Indictment against the Prisoner was, that of cotnpassing, imagining, and intending the deeth of tic King ; or of seizing, detaining, -and imprisoning ehe.person of the King, or of deposing him from his ThrpEle and Dignity. 1y a law' which had passed some time ago,- any at for the furtherance. of these purposes, was declared to be, a substantive at of `,['reason, and when the Jury applied the evitience.whieb had been, given to the law which had been laid•down (subject to the core edition of the Learned ; Bench),..it would; he appre hended, be their duty, painful as the discharge Of that duel' might be, to proeourice the Prisoner Guilty. He then proceeded to comment upen the degree of evidence which the law required to prove an Overt, ad of Treasoti, which he explained in a very clear and distirid menner. The Learned Serjeane (Bette), had quoted it passage-, from, Montesquieu, to prove that words in themselves mulct not amount to an eft Ofjeeesep e but e in answer ro this, he .would qeote what, indthieopieloo, wae r enuch, more .satisfactory dodrine to be laid down in an English, Court of jit'etiee, , trneV wascortainly rrnich,better autho rity, th,in tho,N - "eculatiyeEthism of a Foreign. Writer. He alluded, to the languai;e ;of Lord Hoele,upeou trial,. in, some respeets similar to the present, :Abe , Assassinatipn Plot .;y-,tinst. the-life:of 3 , ;;j Jpoo, , that trial, that Learned ledge was oNic.i and_aisi6ied by either veoerableand learreel, Judges, , who concArred entirely in the opiiiion lie had leid down, vii.e 7 thei words in. thetridelses,, tviien not specifically applied to any, ppttleolee-objcitt, could, not 'amount,.to TI . C4SOrI brit that Ivprds of persuasion, .or .of incitement to whet peisene, to contetit:eAs of Treason oreßebeh. lion, were c) . l:l 7 reastm.4`... (lo4rine hod iwen:,voilbrmly'reeognized and atted Upon since that time, are.l leidebeen.distindly neogpizcel e and quoted by. that . great. authority; ly4. Justice li'oseette ; He:then proceeded to,make aeme ebseteetioes,in ,reply to the objedions which had been made to ,the Evidence. of Accomplices, ancheto e theeeeteittiont that they were ;not entitled tio belief, •e He Ceeteeded .that,. the .Witness, Emb. lio e .,..ceuld.reot,pi'operitebe considered iia the:light ; (f e el" Acepenplice.' 4 He might, 'it was true, : , be deeteed a : week .and 'imprudent man for attending 'spat : meetiogs, ;but it did riot eppeat that tic e took sharte,,in ,their proceedings. " The Learned (loth:man then read the evidence which had'been siven by the. ; ,'Wititess.Emblio; and contended that . et proved incontestibly, thatehe Prisoner not: Only attehtlett e ..lett waseielive, :vela the meetinge, • lie then recaeitteated the evidence• of the other Wit. nteeees,, tele) had positively 'sworn 'to various kb of I.'reaspit . c:, the pact of the. Prisoner, a nd o b serve d , that th eu evidcrice • had been corroborated. in Many material paints, 'by .Witeeeses:to e whose. testimony ileee wee sot the slightest.objeditin. He relied r upon one ; 'sentence:: which had been ute the Prisprcr, and which had , been , proNieflbe., yopo, y a doubt, viz..“ that his-titind tr4,( 4 ,1:, 1 ,p th,it, 1,-art wrA callous." This only swain' to by the heeoni.... h4t.ihey Verft cyrifitiviNt by thz, Landlady Of y inrf.e pulit it -itolu,r, lV ho . Otehired tha t itt: u as *l,l tin.: bat, a1'.13 iledett li t e ) 4 tis auer use t h at then advertcd to the , arguments tipi)tv iliel.;iiinikthility of the 'ease ! The Counsel with the l'rrscne.r, had oontrtaedtir4t the..whole Of the,story , vosf.;;ll.,py;o t ln t , arttia:Y.AtA)re imprObable. He.de iehire4l 1 1 , .;ii:heisit , 04thivrtithjeti in a very different 0:; h:.cattal4llol.lgli tht Carmpiracy might arid dispassionate- " ly tie tSit):,;Q4 ; 4 y:e r r there wits nothing eittr,:tvitgAnt the which the Pri:sOnets' of ,tim that they thc,lllll he able to Ct i t ;old : rt:„"4'y Tim! Iva n qbje4i, Anil :in . ;that thslk:, hitalitrOng COllittietted WCI.I CliS ,l oloi ' lttett in their ex. rt:,:ttny' a eirturnstance for. , tglqte fo,t. 4. hut eritertitting, 4;,fts th e y the:rev of their plan %vas reason.. For enie.iel- their ohjet w s was to take 14' - '4t , x;ion of the Bankrnow this could •ha ye been tipiie 'tfie - .:Arpny bad been corrtipted. Ar.otil s r objet , was;lo take posse sign of the over; roold be 'eery 11-ritairable .if the Army bid , b4,:0 v:d4ccd, They Lad determined to • coo. a summate their wickedness by the che,ti - esqion ~r rut beloved Sovereign, which - datestible purpose might also li<tve beco effeded if the Army had been corrupted., ,'e n tertaining, therefore, as they , the' hope that ehey'llenld be able,to corrupt . the Ariu s J their plep was bypo means so ex teaya. Lf . gent as I , lo,ifT. , Stated. I 117 ; e9ralogance, t,here tore,ew`Aiicei pppe s eted .in Ces'espireley was only egatece elfpo , n this subjed the, Learned dentls;:ean . expatiated for some time With great 'ability e and eloquence. Some reliance had been placed by the Counsel for the Prisoner, on thochareeter which,had been given to him by seve. rat distinguished ,persona. It appeared, certainly, that at one time the Pdsoner hie' obtained a very high reputation 'and dander, liut 'the Jury must perceive, that it was of much too ancient a date to have any weight upon this Case. Viewing the Case as he did, he had no doubt btit that the Jury would find the evidence irresistible,. and that they would be under the necessity of pronouncing the Prisoner guilty. At all events, he was sure that their verdid would be such a one as would give satisfaction to themselves and their } Country. The Evidence and the arguments on both sides being closed, The Lotto CHI r JUSTIC R proceeded to sum up the Evidence, and to deliver his Charge to the jury.—The Charge was ofconsiderable length, and was delivered with great ability; but for the reason we. before stated, we can only give an impeded sketch of it. His Lordship began by 'observing, that the addresses of the Learned Counsel, and the Evidence on both sides being closed, it now re. mained for him to discharge his duty, which was, to recapitulate the Evidence to the Jury, and to make such ;observations upon it as appeared to, him to be neceikaty, which he should do as faithfully, es correctly,` and at the same time as shortly, as he Could. The Prisoner et the Bar stood indieted for the crime of High Treason.—There were, accord ing to the Law of this Country, tlifferent,species of the crime of Treason.—The Statute of the 25th of Edward 111. was decfaratory of the Common Law upon this ,subjed. There were two other species of Treason, enaded by a late Ad ,of liament ; whether the offences specified in that 'Ad were' or were not Ireasoe before it passed, it was not now *necessary to discuss ; certainly, they Were always . so considered: But by t he Ad of the 361114. present Majesty, conspiring' or egreeing to depose the King, or to restrain or impri son his person, or to - deprive him 9f his kingly name and dignity, were declared to be High Treason. The first charge advanced against the Prisoner in this ind.idment, wee . ehat of compassing and imagining the King's death,` and upon these points there were eight distind.Overt e ads charged ; it Was unneces eery for him to do,nore than to state the substapes of them. They were applicable to the' th r e e ' dif ferent heads of charge to which he had befere alluded, 'viz. Ist, that upon the ancient Smote for coin. 'passing and, i ma gi n i ng the King's death ; zd, the imprisonment or restraint of bis person; and, 3d, the conspiring,to deTose kris Majesty from his royal state and digoity. .f he offence, charged was what Wes the purpose of the mind and imagination of the accused patty ,to accomplish, and the Overt ads . ;Overt in evidence to prove such intention were, the !different meetings and consultations of - the accused 'persons in order to esfed the yurpose of their minds. The seducipg of Soldieis, specifically named in the indidmeot, endsnany others, end the_ administering of unlaWful paths to bind th6ll to the . execution of ;their purpescs, to ,keep them secrer;. Those Turpoes were,. is had been eireisdy, steted, to de. steer the King,. to take possessionof the .Banle a n d of the Tower, to stop thoMail.coaches, .as s e to the people its the country of the proceedregS which ~h ad taken place, in the hopes .t h at t h ey would take. the Merin' and rise.. In addition to the ()Ned of, either destroying or restraining the per son of the' King, it was` also propoeed to surround the two Houees of Parliament. lt would be ne ; ceesaey, his Lordship sai d, before he proceeded to recapitulate the evidence to the juey, to make a few abiervations upon whal had beeosaid' upon the subjed.of words being considered as ;mounting to Treason. It had been contended by ,the Learned gentlemen of Counsel with the Prisoner, that word's could not constitute the crime Of Treason. - Now if it was merely meant thin wards were Oseleaand inapplicable to any purpohe that jedicated 'any par, tictilar design, they. certainly could not be held 'to be High Treason. 1,44. words' ,uttered. with a de sign to persuade,.or Incite Others to cot minit Tree sto, or to concur in en ad of. Treason' were one doubtedly .in themselves Overt-ads cif ) Treason. There could be no doubt bet thetewhen'a consulta tion was iteld for the purpose of devieing means to commit Treasons words used at such a consultation,, with a view to perseade persons 'to engage in it, were 9vert-eds of Treason.. This was a doetrine which, .since time , of the decision. , which' had been quereilby the SotICIT4tt.GEz E et.,had never. been doesbted, and was confident never would be doubted. s . Another point which had be en settingly urged by the Counsel for the Prisoner was, that .the Jury ought not to attend , to the'evitieoce of an ac., compute.Thil eras certainly, in soine instences, matter of very delicate consideration. Th at an accomplice was a. competent Witness, was a pro positson titan could not be doubted, .and that . he might, ie, many instances, be it .eredible. Witness, was also. clear ; for Wan itc9mplice,,was not a COM petent Witness, or ,if he Was to' be , alway s c o n s sidered ,as u nwort hy o f cre di t , it would be useless to eseamine, him at all. The. evidence of accom. pikes was, therefore, always received with great caution .and consideration. , In this case some .'of the Witnesses were certainly to a .certain extent ittilied, hut not all in an eve! degree. Some things might be imputed to some of the Witnesses, which. cats fitly co old not be impoied to others; but even those who, were liztble to the greatest objedion on ac_ count of their charader, might be confirmed in many things; hy s isther Witnesses, , and might even deserve credit for .titirsgs which they stated', treat the eleareess and consistency of their own nartertion, brit still more so, when they were-confirmed othertewho were, not, linked Nish. them in the Conspiracy, 'and also .by a varietYpf external circumstances, If it was teue„that , Attotopliees were in no cases to be deemed wortbyeiCeredite,then that whiele Lord Holt loci stated, would certainly be theconsesUencei that Treasbnable Conspiracies Could nevel. tee . de: b eco u se it was perfeelly crear that -nonperson could give evidenCe of the circumstance 'of ,a Con.' spiracy, but those who were acquainted with them ; And nObody could be 'acquainted-with `tlie circum. iltances Of the Conspiricy, but those'who met with the Conspirators, or who heard: the particulars from the parties concerned.. This was the case of the , Witness Emblin ; it'was'nor cleat that' he was int. p r licared in this Conspiracy, though he certainly heard their consultationS. There was a description of WitnesSes who could not, with propriety, be called Accomplices, , although they might be pre,. sent at the consultations: For instance - , if per_ sons attended for 'the express purpose of dis. covering the intentions of the persons who were Consulting, for the express purpose perhaps, of check ing and frustrating them ; they might be witnesses of - the fad without partaking of the guilt, at least in the case of Treascin.- Such,' perhaps, might be the case ofEmblin, or he might originally have had some guilt/ intentions, and he might have wavered in his' inientions afterwards,' therefore the term Accomplice did not belong to him, at least it was not clear that it did. Certainly he was not without blaine ; no mind that was very delicate, would have countenanced crimes so long, dough he afterwards might haV'e disclosed them. Now having made these general observations upon the nature of Accomplices, and having stated' that they might be believed if their own story was clear and consistent, and espe. cially if they were confirmed by 'other Witnesses who were not suspeard; it remained for the Jury to determine whether • the Witness I mblin Was or was not to be believed in what he had stated. His Lordship then proceeded to recapitulate the evidenceo which had been given, .Tri commenting upon the evidence of the Witness Francis, his Lordship said, that the. paper was found in the room containing the Declaration and 'the Oath which had already' been alluded to, and it was' for the 'jury to 'consi der on the evidencewhich they had heard, whether the Prisoner was or was not co-operative 'in the deaigns of the other persons who met at these con sultations for the purposes already mentioned, and which were charged as Overt-ads in the Inditimenr. That this Oath was, at all events, most dangerous and mischievous was most certain. The words of it were these: • In the presence of Aimiehty God, T, A. B. do solemnly declare, that I will endeavour to the best in my power to. obtain the obleas of this Uoion, viz. to recover those Rights whieh the Supreme Being in his infinite Bounty has given to all men ; that ncifher 11003 nor fears, rewards nor punish ments, shall. induce me to me information directly or inoi, reetly, concerning the business of any Member of this or any, other suatilar Society, so help me God:" The Declaration which the Oath alluded 'to was this : .Constitution.—The independance of Great Britain and Irelahrl-'an equalization of Civil,' Political, and Religious Rights—an • ample proVition ter the families of those heroes who shall fall in the contest, a liberal reward fordistin., tinguished merit; these are the objeCts for which we con. tend, to obtain these objects we swear to be united.". • • What those ci v il; R e li g i ous , and Political Rights Were, which they considered such as must at 01 events be obtained, they had ifot specified; per. haps they were such as had been attempted' to be obtained in another Country. With reaped to' the ff heroes who , might fall in the contest," it was, difficult . to su pp ose h o W p ersons could fall i n ' a contest to obtain Civil and R e li g i ous Rights, unless it was intended to use force to obtain them. This 04th and Declar at i on were therefore'eertailq or a dant i erous and mischievons complexion, even if tal . teii ahstrgiedly ; they were connead with other gts, tbey might serve to explain the inten.. don Of the persons who formed these consultations., Their intention, as declared at sonic the meet- . ings was, to' take or - destroy the person. of ,the King, 'Phis was po s i t i ve l y sworn to by, some of the \Vitnessei, againit• whose testimony no itnpu- taiion wOulti lie, and Whn'als o s t ate d t h a t the Pri.. stiller was of eof the Conspiraeofs; That he was seen, in their coMp an y a t var i ous times and places was most clear, and that a paper was fotintl in the room cootaining this`Oaih and Declaration was also true.; though the paPer certainly was not fiurn.l upon the person of the Pri:amer.. lint if the Ptisoner was there whe n ot h er persons eonsultin.g and tni . ng upon these . .ilbjetts, it wa for hini to stew that he tvas there for any purpose diffe'rent'frOM that which vit,ns the intention of those 'with* whOrraie was ass°. 4ited, that he. had different views from those which vVere'imputed to him, It was. for him to Am the reason 'Why lie came to he present at such tation, and how he came to be so often it such places, and in such coMpany ; more particularly, When it Was considered that at time alltley Arms he apoearetl.to command the others, and they seemed to obethim. His 'Lordship then w ent ov er the, most material, part s o f the' evidence of. Windsor and Ern and,Observed, that if the evidence of either of these men was trUe, or indeed if the evi , lence i ,of the La n dl a d y , W h o s w ore i to t h e words used by the'Pri soner, was to be relied upon, it wr , n!,l'be, for the jury :o cdoider wh i ather the Prisoner' could pos. • sihly be innocent of the charge imputed to him. Flaving finished his reeapittilation of the Whole of the evidence, his. Lordship said, the-facts were now, all before'.the jury: It was admitted that the Pri. soner 'was at the places 'epedifled in the Indidimen't ; 'it was admitted' that he was present at these eonsultatiopi, and it was — proved, that what was done at these contultationS, amounted to . the crime of Treason. NOT' he wimild ask,. if under these 'circurosiances`the Prisoner was mit a Traitor, who was a TraitOr /4 If, indeet, all the . Witnesses were persons who ought not to be believed upon their oaths, then there was an end of the case. If the Witnesses were - persons who were unworthy of credit upon their oaths, it was competent to the Prisoner to have' called Witelesses to shew that such was their character ; but noattempthad'been Made to call any evidence of that kind. As to what" he had said before respeeting the Evidence of Accotn. plices, hp would only add, that' they must, 'armost in'all Traitorous Conspiracies, he examined before the Conspiracy 'could be disclosed. So, much w as this tcit to be the case, that the pr oo f of some'COn. viracies had rested chiefly, nay almoSt entirely, non the Evidence of Accomplices. That was the ease in the trial alluded 'to by the Soklc ITOR.GENtRAL, &rt the oettions concerned in the Assassination Plot ; almost all the WitnesSes were Conspirators andcon. corned in the plot, and yef their evidence svi; dived and believed. But lbw wet* Wittitsitts !, examined in this case who were not Accomglev: Several persons who were standing in the Pofeli:. houses, proved tithe Prisoner to be present : tlir I,andlady of the .Flying Horse had gone latt!sie.. for ,she provellethe,langteige which the Prisoner had: made 'wee:l6llnd this was a most material cou.. firmation. As to.the ,witness Embliti, it eligetev said that he didruot possess quite so much delica9y',a s some men; but he 'did- not see that.his evideneelvai therefore wholly, unworthy of credit. There were in some of the evidence some slips, but ,they.were confirmed. in :almost every material poiet. was said that a man of the education and rank of the Pri• loner, could not with any probability enter elte such a plot With.sitelypersons as those who wer e accused with 'him ; but then they ought. to hake shewn how it was that a person of the rank and situation of the Prisoner, happened to be sooften in company with those persons, and for whaepurpose it was that he associated with them. If he.wes a partaker in the Conspiracy which was proved ae!' admitted to exist, for what purpose did he meet th' Conspirators What possible end could he .propoA -to himself in 'constantly attending their consulta tions 1 Had the Prisoner she wn, or had he a ttemln e d to eliew. that he attended there for any innocent per pose ? Had he , offered .any evidence to shew 1 110 he had endeavoured to dissuade ; the Conspirators from their purpose ?—None. If then the Pfl iQn A er was found in' these sus pi c i ous c i rcu M et ances s 21— had given no e vid enc e to exp l a i n hi s con d e a l it mained for the Jury to draw their own infeteeee.. With regard to the character which had been gi wi to the Prisoner,-it appeared that he at one time 411 " joyed as good a - charatter as a man could NT ord Nelson (on whom it would be waste of worti s to attempt any . eulogium), had given him one 01 best of characters, as well as General Clarke, end ''' r Nepean. But theevidence of these lionOurable Peri: ions had no r e l a ti on w h atever to the.4tter . Put the life of the Pri soner . Thi s was t h e whole of tt') evidence on both sides. If the Jury believed the evidence for the Prosecution, they had proved , ai 4lg , case. It was,- however, fur the Jury to say what Credit they would g i ve to t h e w i tnesses ; and, a they they had any doubt, would take into co oside. ; ration the very excellent character which bad been given to the Priso ner . If,. however, the witile' se ' i, for the Pr os e cut i on were tszt be bel i eve d , he saw n° which a doubt, either in law or fact, could rest. The Jury then withdrew, and in about foil minutes returned with a verdia of—GU/LTV' The Foreman of the. Jury then said, MY Ur mi r we earnestly reco m m en d t h e P r i soner to MercYo4;4, account of the high test i mon i a l s o f h i s f or mer g condo 1, services, and charaaer." The Court- then adjourned a t t h ree o 'cipc4 to. ; morning. Day--Itte.ineid.l . ,y, F. 9. Ai nine o'clock this morning, all the rernaioi n t Prisoners, twelve i n num b er , were put v i ol t heir lr Trial, which continued till half past six the fo lowing (this) morning, when, alter the Charge 13f the ChiefTlU;tice, the Jury retired, and deliberated till eight o'clock, when they appcared,,iu COO and .returntid the following VerdiEt : John Wood.-Curly. Thomas 3rot4liton—Oztiv. John Franci—C.zdky.' fitiomas Newrnin.:Gori/r, recommended to, 74 ' 10 ! Daniel Tyndall-4WD , , .recommended to Meld`' lames Sed i ovick y. Wnlutrn Lander—Gmiky, recommended to.Nferc77 Arthur (;ratun--(;kti:),. • • •••‘ tamizel Sthith—N4 " • * ohn ' • ThOmas No toik ohp Doyle—,V.4 Gailify. • '‘ . Sentence of Death was pronounced on all wh 4 were found guilty, Edward Mara:, v t . i pard it'" cki4cd ; after. which the Commission ended. (We.shaltgivnthaPAc =dins on the abovo Trial, in 0 0 PAO: of T.o7tnotrow:j 10/IPSRIAL P4IBLIAJIIEBI, HOUSE OF PEERS. . wiptitsriAy, rEs. 9. I t • CoI:NSAL Were ilear4 in continuation relative to L ‹c tc Appeal--Lawson NriVyvti!, Roil; and; others V ii. ha C , ItANT, as se c ond Couborrefr the Appellant, shortly en side.; and Mr. RPMI Y, 'apt. great knstit,• on behal f qE Resporldents,. After which their Lordsbips &leered the , ther hearing'of the case till &Icinday; , The Marquis of figkTVORD SWOrtlano tOQ. The. Naturatizatiop Hills of Mesrs..l4itterlohe, Gre,ll4%;;rt Schutz, and Beiland, after the 04ths of. FidelitY, sates -1441 duly administered to . those Gentlemen, isfere read A , 1: 4 Some rout,ne business was tben t tune, and referred,to the considetstion of Committees ot their Lordshipi . . adjourned till to-morrow. ransaaed• and the liotoc 110C,ISif OF COMMONS. LrU FEB. 9. _ art Vri The tiouse - pioceedidie ballot fora'Conimittec to ' l 4Ol merits of the Election ter. Shattesbury,'when,- _OW . tite its' forms been gone through, r ale following returned upon the C om mi ttee , and sworn at the 1 - 417.'" The Hon. Thos. Maitland, !Charles .- Morgan, Eglt Ai d, Uosvitio, E The Marquis ofßigl 4l '" fidward.Buller, ‘ Esq. Andrew S tf:11)411, semi. • John Palmer,"Esq. John S 3 rkel) .1 6 4, ..A Charlet Cockerel! Esq. eorge Peter 11 011 °,,'"'. The Hon. konert Cockerel!, Sir Tnomas TheQo'*` l4-. George Johnston, Isq. calf, .134 r t and Henry 1 oddrelt, Esq. Henry Howard, tsq•„„i s j The Ssca IVA* v WArt gave notice, that he $l7, tra in. Friday move tor leave t o bum in a Bill to authotiZo "lays. ing.and exercising of the Militia for aS d ,4 days instead 0f 21 „ f ,. Mr. Kcxas moved todischarge the Order made o aai ll da) last, tor the produetion of certain ra Br = otherS, crs Attlirs of the Ca rnatic, and then moved roP stead thereof, I.vhich were ordered. tr o ti.• he Sri KEA gave notice, that he should count the , . to „ for the purpose of a b41.10t, precisel y at halt' past thi ce. morrow., r e rrieS Mr. Costa Y postponed his intended Motion, for re, „to, certain Acts relating to the Irish Revenue to Coto gni without naming anyday. W SIP The Contmissioners .of the Customs, and M r. ll C . , , n AD, trom the - `Transport Board, presented se a l counts, which were o;dered to lie on the Table. The orumittee of Supply and Ways and hicariS ivy"' ferred'till Friday. . Adjourned. at six o'clock till to-morrow. *.* No Mails or French Papers have atr ived this mothing. Londart: Print:4 by B, APNIILLAN (of Bow•sar t j, Covent-GArdert; and I'ubli4hvi by INti.LtAkt scaarrs fof .garb Multen.street, G rutsmor.viuttf dt 14?. iza, Stu:l4. . .