The Sun. — London, England, 1844-07-09 00:00:00

fourtb3 l 2bition SUN OFFICE, Seven o'Cloch. THE STATE TRIALS. (FIFTH DAY.) WRIT OF ERROR. HOUSE OF LORDS.-(THIS DAY.) THE QUEEN AGAINST O'CONNELL AND OTHERS. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, for Ireland (in con tinuation from our Afteinoon Edition), said—The Challenger stated that fifty-nine names were omitted which ought to have been returned ; and he then weut on to state that from the said paper writing a certain book, purporting to be the jurors book for the year 1844 was made up, from which the special jury list was made out. It was not denied in the challenge that a general list was made up by the Recorder—that it was delivered by him to the clerk of the peace—that the clerk of the peace made up, in pursuance of the Act of Parliament, a book from the general list, which he delivered to the sheriff, and that the sheriff from that made up the special jury list; yet it was now contended that this omission invalidated the jurors' book, though the omission might have either occurred through mistake on the part of the Recorder's registrar, or at the dictation of one cf the defendants, or any other person unconnected with the Crown. He certainly thought their Lordships would come to the conclusion that it would be impossible for him, on the part of the Crown, to take issue on an aver ment of that kind, and that he should be guilty . of a breach of his duty to the Crown if he had joined issue upon it, and, notwithstanding all the obloquy which he had been suffering in consequence of it in Ireland, be was the more strengthened in the opinion that he had acted properly, becausehis Learned Friend the Attorney- General was of opinion that he ought not to have done so. He begged to call their Lordships' attention to sec tions 35 and 36 of the Act of Parliament, which would show in what cases names which were omitted might be inserted. In the 35th section of the Act there was a specific provision to meet the particular case of fraud, and penalties were provided if it was proved that the collectors had fraudulently omitted any names, and in that particular case the book was to be corrected, if there was either a wilful insertion or omission of names, which ought not to have been inserted or omitted. The 36th section stated the penalties which should be suffered by persons who were found guilty in this respect, and it gave power to the justices before whom such conviction took place, to certify to the clerk of the peace that such wrong emission or insertion had occurred, and the clerk of the peace was to make a list in which such wrong insertion or omission was to be cured. Thus their Lord ships would see that the Act of Parliament had specifi cally provided for those cases where there was a wilful insertion or omission of the names, and the means of amending such insertion or omission was pointed out ; yet it was said that he should have made the amendment in the list in defiance of the Act of Parliament, which specited those particular cases in which the Act of Par liament provided that amendments were to be made. Lc rd CAMPBELL—Had you consented, with the con sent and privity of the traversers, that such a course sheeald be adopted, could the traversers have assigned for err ur that the Act of Parliament had not been properly cc mplied with? The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland) apprehended that iu that case the jurors' book would not be a good jurors' book, and if the parties challenged that they were tried by names not in the jurors' book, his consent would not be a good plea to the challenge. He submitted that it was really the object of the Legislature to take away the challenge to the array, and to preclude the sheriff from exercising any control over the list. The next point to which he should call the attention of their Lordships was that of the pleas in abatement. Their Lordships would understand, from the manner in which the record was made up, that all these pleas in abatement exactly corresponded with each other, without the slightest difference.. They'all sought to raise •this question, that the witnesses before the grand jury ought to have been sworn under the provisions of the 58th of George 111., that is to say, they ought to have been sworn in open Court, and that, not having been so sworn, the proceedings were altogether Now, he con tended that all these pleas wet; both insufficient and informal. Both in England and in Ireland it IN as necessary that pleas in abatement should be verified. Now there was no allegation that the names of the wit nesses who were sworn were unknown to the plaintiffs in error. Ile then cited from Comyn an opinion of Lord Holt on this point, where that learnei authority stated that a matter could never be assigned as error which the party might have plea-led in abatement, as it must be taken for his own folly that he had omitted to do so. `The whole object of the assignment of errors in fact was to amend the plea in abatement. For this purpose-only one error in fact could be assigned though as many errors in law might Ate - assigned, as a party pleased. As only one error in fact could be assigned, they could not allow that to be assigned as an error in fact at two periods of the same proceedings, which they .svorild not allow to be assigned as error twice over. Ile submitted that on the principle laid clon in the authori ties already cited, they could not asse'p an error in fact and use it as a plea of abatement also. It could be proved by the Journals of the House of Lords, that their Lordships, on a writ of error, would not investigate matters of fact in error, and would not, therefore, re verse a judgment on a matter of fact ascertained. Lord CesieneeL—l believe if you look at the books you will Lind that in nullo est erratum admits the fact, and if you wish to traverse it, you must deny the fact. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland)—He would apply himself to that point. Upon an assignment of error, the Court of Qin en's Bench could not have denied any of the facts in dispute. Lord CAMPBELL—Do you say that if the record were Crought by writ of error to the superior court, that court could not review the judgment of the court below, and overrule the error assigned in fact ? The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland)—l respectfully •submit that to your Lordships. The LORD CHANCELLOR—It comes here as a question -of law. in a different way. By the fifth count the defendants were found guilty of unlawfully and maliciously conspir ing to create discontent and disaffection among the sub jects of the Queen and to the Government. Now the first case on the subject was the , case of th - . " King v. Redhead Yorke," reported in the State Trials. The Right Hon. and Learned Gentleman then quoted from the 9th volume of Carrington and Payne's Reports, page 275, the case of the " Queen v;Vincent." Vincent had been one of the associates of Frost, who bad been found guilty of high treason. Frost had not been tried upon the indictment for conspiracy, but Vincent had been tried. The first count on which he had - been in dicted charged him with conspiring to excite discontent and disaffection amongst the liege subjects of her Ma jesty against the constitution, and of endeavouring by assembling a large number of persons to excite peril and alarm in the mind of her Majesty's liege subjects, and by exciting such peril and alarm to procure a change in the constitution. In that case the j ury had found Vincent guilty. He had procured a copy of the indictment from the so. licitor of the Treasury. The indictment had been tried on the 26th of March, 1840, and the indictments in that case were identical with the present. One of the Learned Counsel who had addressed them on the present occasion for the plaintiffs in error, and who had par ticularly directed their Lordships' attention to that count in the indictment, had been one of the counsel for the Crown when' Vincent was tried. But what was discontent and disaffection in 1840, when the Learned Gentleman was in office, be came legitimate opposition in 1844. However, the case of the " Queen v. Vincent" was a precedent for them. The case of the " King v. Hunt" furnished a similar precedent; and there was another precedent in the case of " Law v. Allan," reported in the 2d Lynch, page 796. That was a precedent for an indictment for general conspiracy. In that indictment it was al leged that Law had conspired to seduce men from their allegiance, without stating when or by what means. The Learned Gentleman then quoted the case of the " King v. De Berenger," as a precedent for the present indictment. The same observations applied to the Gth and 7th counts of the indictment. The Learned Gentle man on the other side had put the case of a mob who met to intimidate another mob which sought to procure changes in the law and in the Constitution. But a mob meeting for this purpose was not a mob meeting for the purpose of producing changes in the law by intimidation and the demonstration of physical force. Lord Baonamr.3l—That would not be an answer to the case put by Mr. Kelly. He put the case of an Orange mob coming down to intimidate the Houses of Parliament, and then he supposed a loyal mob coming down and saying that they would prevent the Orange mob from intimidating the Houses of Parliament, in order that the Act of Emancipation, or any other Act, Might be passed. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland)—That would be a mob going down to intimidate the Orange mob, but it would not be a mob met for the purpose of procuring changes in the Constitution. Lord BROUGHAM—Yes, it would, for they came down to intimidate the Orange mob, in order to procure the Emancipation Act. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland) apprehended that a mob coming down to free Parliament from the pressure of another mob, would not be a mob convened to procure alteration and changes in the Constitution. The LORD CHANCELLOR—But would it be a mob unlawfully, maliciously, and seditiously convened? Lord BROUGHAM—Aye, aye, that is another question. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland)—When their Lordships came to examine the count they would find it did not apply to such meetings. There was nothing dissimilar in it from the count n the case of Feargus O'Connor, which had been tried before Mr. Baron Rolfe, in which the judgment was arrested on the count in which he was found guilty, because the count was with out a venue. Lord DENMAN said there were two counts in that case on which the defendant was convicted. One of those counts they considered too general, but they gave no judgment, as the party was not brought up for judg ment. They also thought that the venue count was not good. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland)—The Learned Gentleman on the; other side alluded to the words, the demonstration of great physical force, and said, that they meant nothing. He would refer their Lordships, on this point, to the language used by Lord Chief Justice Tiridal. He then read the judgment of Chief Justice Tindal, and proceeded to:say, that though the large meetings might be for a more innocent purpose than high treason, yet the holding those meetings certainly amounted to an aggravated misdemeanour,. as it was impossible to say to what consequences theY might not lead. It had been alleged as an objection to this count, that it was not stated who were the parties who were to be in timidated ; but he contended that this was not necessary ; in the case of a conspiracy to defraud generally, it was not necessary to state who were to be defrauded. He next proceeded to the counts which charged a' conspiracy to bring the tribunals of the country into hatred and contempt. He could con ceive no more grave offence than thus endeavouring to bring the administration of justice into disrepute. In the case of the riot at the theatre in Dublin, in which a bottle was thrown at Lord Wellesley, it was decided that though the parties had a right to express their ap probation, 3ct what was right in the individual, was illegal when there was a pre-combination for that pur pose. In the case of the officers in the East India Company's service, reported in 4th Burrow, the parties were all indicted for a conspiracy. Lord Mans field held that, although each individual had a right to . say " I will throw up my commission because batta has been refused," yet an agreement to that effect constituted a conspiracy. The Learned Counsel then went on to show that the indictments in these cases were similar to the count for endeavouring to procure a change in the law by a demonstration of phy sical force. and read the count for that purpose. His Learned Friend had so ably argued that part of the case that he would not trouble their Lordships by ar guing it at greater length. As to the extreme cases which had been put by the other side, such as the con spiring to steal a loaf of bread on one day, and conspiring to fire a house on the next, he would only say, that no judge would allow two such offences to be in eluded under one conspiracy. As to the ques tion of good and bad counts, there was no analogy in civil and criminal cases. In civil cases there could be a venire de novo ; but that could not apply to criminal cases. The court of assize could not make up its record with such a distinction between good and bad counts. They could not enter up ajudgment non obstante vere dicto ;'neither could they enter a verdict of acquittal. It was no matter how many counts there were in the in dictment, the question was whether the party was guilty of the offence charged in the indictment, and was there a finding to warrant the judgment. If the arguments on the other side were to prevail, it would strike at the full scope of criminal justice.. He trusted their Lordships would not come to any conclusion that would do anything to alter the whole mode in which the criminal business of the country was transacted. There was another point ,to which he would slightly ad vert, and that was the point raised upon the first count of the indictment. It was nut necessary that they should all be pronounced guilty, there was nothing inconsistent in saying that some might be guilty of the whole and some in part, and if that was without the issue it puts an end to the objection. As to the dis continuance point their Lordships had received no answer of any entries that had been made in accordance with the ancient custom. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland) thought he was justified in asserting, that if this matter came on upon a writ of error in England, it could not stand for one moment. It was stated in Teesdale's ease that at Durham it had been the uniform practice for the foreman of the grand jury to swear the witnesses. The practice was so stated by Sir Gregory Lewin ; and if it were not justified by the common law, it never could have passed without objection. Before the 56th of George 111. c. 87, a practice had prevailed in many of the grand juries in Ireland of their finding a bill of in dictment without examing witnesses for the crown. The °Eject of that Bill was to make it compulsory to swear witnesses in open court previous to the finding of the bill of indictment. Their Lordships would ob- Serve that all the pleas in abatement admitted that the witnesses should have been sworn under the Act of 1816 —the Act to empower the foreman of any grand jury in Ireland to administr r oaths to witnesses in Ireland. The Act of 1816 was admitted to extend to every grand jury in Ireland. The mischief to be remedied was, that the informations were laid before the grand jury, and no witnesses were examined viva voce, the object being to substitute viva voce examinations for written testimony; and, as one of the Learned Counsel had ad verted to the practice in the House of Lords, he sub mitted that the swearing of witnesses whilst the pro ceedines were going on led to some confusion, and that the oath so administered was not so impressive as when adminstered by those who had to receive the testimony. Persons sworn in court might not he examined for two or three days, and certainly the impressiveness of an oath, might lose its force in that interv a l, w hi c h use d to ' occur before the Act of 1838. That Act was an im portant general remedial measure. The preamble stated SPIRIT of the .PUBLIC' JOURNALS. that the practice of swearing witnesses in court was at- FROM THE EVENING PAPERS OF THIS DAT. tended with great delay and inconvenience. Since that GLOBE.—Among the Parliamentary business on the time, in alt the commissions that had been issued, and paper for this evening, Mr. Ross will move the House of tried in the Recorder's Court in Lublin, the witnesses Commons for the production of copies of the corre were sworn by the Grand Jury. How, then, would the spondenee• which has passed between the Irish Govern case be, if, as represented for the appellants, the Act ment, and any other parties, relative to the re•instatc alid not extend to Commissions in which the Judges of • ment of Mr. O'Driscoll in the commission of the the superior Courts were included ? It frequently hap- peace in that country. As the removal of Mr. a - tened that the jury had been charged by the Recorder, O'Driscoll from the magistracy was caused by had retired, examined the witnesses, and found the bills conduct an that gentleman- which drew down by the time t hat the two Judges came into Court. Now, upon him no ordinary portion of justly-merited 'was it necessary that all the witnesses should be re-sworn censure and reproach, it is only right that the Govern in open court before the Judges, and the whole of the ment which has restored him should have an opportm procep , lin g s gone over again ? Yet, if this objection nity of showing — either that the imputations cast upon were good, s u c h w ou ld b e t h e ease ; and every man . Mr. O'Driscoll were not justified by the facts ; or 'who had hea t ronvicesal _and trsnseorted under these that the conduct charged against him does not dis- Commisaions was wr ong ly - iiimportcd. It was a cu- qualify him for the office of a magistrate, however ricus coineidenee that the first judge who charged a much it may derogate from his position as a gentleman, grand jury under the Act was Baron Wolfe, whose or his reputation for huniapity. The present state of slaws was on this bill. public feeling in Ireland is such as to render care and Lord CAMPBELL—Had he the Act before hm at the caution, in the selection of persons for the office of time ? magistrates, essentially necessary on the part of the The ATTORNEY-GENERAL (for Ireland) did not know. Government. Many magistrates, in whom the great mass Bat he thought that when a judge instructed a jury on of the people had confidence, have been removed from tho cons; rectum of an Act of Parliament, he would the commission for taking part in meetings of the Repeal have made himself acqua'nt , d with that Act. In the Association. The number of magistrates for whoseadmi tweeting part of the Bell it was enacted, that "In nistration of thelaws the Irishpeasantrycherishedrespect, rill cases which should come before grand juries has been thus greatly diminished ; and their dependence in Ireland for their consideration," the witnesses on the impartiality of the Judicial Bench has :been might be sworn by the foreman or other members of the to this extent shaken. It was, therefore, no less greed jury, and that the clerk of the crown at assizes, due to the people, whose interest in the character and the clot kof the peace at B eS'iun, shoOld i CildOrSe the of the magistrates is immense, than it was neces- TIMM'S of the witnesses on the hack of the bill. Mr. sary for the maintenance of social order and cheer- Nally laid great stress upon this point. The Right ful obedience to the laws--4oth which the Government Hon. and Learned Gentleman then proceeded to refer to is bound to promote, and ought, by its administration, to cases on th e su bj ec t, i n the 2d Institute, pages 393, 394. aim to secure—that the magistrates' bench should be and 426. lle did not think it was necessary he should free from gross instances of indecorum. No appoint tristable- their Lordships with any further ells- ment having a tendency to strengthen and extend serrations on the assignment in error, except with dissatisfaction with the constitution of the magis respect to M r . Steele's assignment of error in f ac t, tracy among the Irish people, ought at any time to and that he venture d to say could not be sustained be allowed to pass unquestioned in Parliament ; but, fo'r the reasons he had already mentioned. He admitted under present circumstances, it is especially impera thnt tel the witnesses had been svtoru, tut the officer i Live that Ministers should be called to a strict account not having put his initials en the bill, the whole was in- for any marked departure from the rules which ought valid; now he stihmitted that it was not. He would now to regulate the creation or restoration of individual shortly call the attvotion of their Lordships to the in- magistrates. Ministers have shown themselves deter dittment in the present case. He thought he had some mined to supersede political opponents for attending grounds to complain of some of the Learned Counsel who political meetings against which they have issued their appeared on behalf' of thesplainOffe in er ror , one o f t h em d ecrees of proibition. By so doing, they have having adverted to matters_that were not within the diminished the public confidence in the adminis record. Whoever had instructed the Learned Counsel tration of justice. In many districts the Bench to' maize the statement he did had instructed him is exclusively occupied by partizans of the Government, to state that which was not true. Having which has placed itself in antagonism with the 5t44 ,1 t e as „ muc h he would proceed with his sympathies of the people. In such a state of things arguments notwithstanding the language that had been as this, could anything be more impolitic—more calcu used by one of the Counsel for the plaintiffs of error, who hated to rouse public indignation againstthe Government, inspsaaing of the vituperative language of some parts of and to engender suspicion among the peasantry, as to the the indietinent, ssemed to have made use of it himself, impartiality of the administration of the laws—than to because he said that nothing but confidence in a political see an individual replaced on the Bench, whose recent jury coaNIjEWS4/A4PlOt indictment to be framed as removal from it had been provoked by his own outrage it bad )s-,, - • • - opinion could have justified upon the laws, and his intemperate attack upon the coon el cue •ations. The fifth count of belief) of magistrates, who had, with great reluctance, i th° tb . 4 10Vkk, e the first to which an ! convicted him of that savage outrage? Yet such is the d the reason probably j transaction to which the attention of Parliament will be to the earlier counts j called this evening. A l 4*ukiti at ct ua ts were embodied I STANDARD.—Mr. Gladstone's admirable speech - . The Loan CHANCELLOR said, that if the Hon. Gentle man the Attorney-General for Ireland had any point on which he wished to remark, their Lordships would hear it when they re-assembled in an hour and a half. The further hearing was then adjourned to half past six. THE SUN, LONDON, TUESDAY EV.ENING, JULY 9, 1844 . upon the second reading of the Railway . Bill, leaves I little to be said upon the subject. The principle of the question lies in a very narrow compass. A railway company comes to Parliament for a Bill—obtains it— displaces all other means of travelling upon the same line ; and then proceeds to make exactly such charges, and dispense such accommodation as it thinks will afford it the greatest amount of profit. This is the natural course of things, and the natural remedy for any evil arising out of it is competition. Accordingly, the rates being thought too high, or the accommodation insufficient, another railway company claims from Par liament permission to lay down another railway parallel to the former. Oh no, cry the elder company, we have invelted our money upon the faith of a public engage ment that there should be no second railway on this same line. This is all quite fair. "Public faith" is to be maintained inviolable; but there is to he no respect to " railway faith." Railway companies invest their money - upon the 'faith that they are to have a monopoly ; but do they not take that mo nopoly under an implied pledge that they will not abuse it by an extortionate tax upon the locomotion of the Queen's subjects—a monopoly of the means of which locomotion they have got into their own hands. It seems' to us that the obligation between Parliament and the railway companies is reciprocal.. Parlia ment is to protect their monopoly—they are not to make a use of it oppressive to the public. But how is Parliament to enforce the observance of their plighted faith upon these Companies ? By fixing their fares, and arranging the accommodation pravided for passengers and carriers? This would never answer. The only means that Parliament can resort to is, either to allow of competition by rival railways, which, as every one must see, would invite to a dead loss of an enormous amount of capital that might be better employed, or to claim the power of buying in for the public the existing railway at a fair price. The Bill be fore Parliament reserves to Parliament this latter right, and we cannot guess upon what principle so fair a pro. position can be resisted. COURSE OF EXCH. Amsterdam CF. 12 54 Ditto, at sight l2 , g Rotterdam 2U. 12 6 Antwerp 25 90 Hamburgh 31.8. 13 13 Altona l3 131 Paris, 3 days' sight 25 60 Ditto, 3 months 25 80 Marseilles 25 85 Bourdeaux 25 85 Frankfort on Maine l2li Petersburgh, 3Us 37 Berlin 7 kNGE.—(THIS DAY.) Gibraltar Leghorn 3O 45' Genoa 25 90 Milan Venice 47 Naples ........ Palermo, per oz llB Lisbon 54 Oporto s3f Rio Janeiro 23 Bahia 23 Buenos Avres NewYork,2ldyssight Philadelphia PRICES OF BULLION, PER OZ. Foreign Gold, bars. £3 17 9 Portugal Gold Coin 3 17 5 New Doubloons-- 0 0 0 New Dollars 0 4 10i Silver in' Bars 0 4 118 Vienna, effee. fl:3 M 952 Trieste, ditto Madrid 37 Cadiz Bilbao 36 Barcelona 36 Sevilla THE LONDON GAZETTE (THIS EVENING.) FOREIGN-OFFICE, JULY 50844._ The Queen baa been pleased to approve of Mr. Michael Ken nedy as Consul at Galway for the United States of America. WHITEHALL, JULY 6. The Queen has been pleased to present the Rev. Donald M'Connochie to the church and parish of Durness, in the presbytery of Tongue and county of Sutherland, vacant in consequence of the Rev. William Finlater, late Minister thereof, having ceased to be a minister of the Church of Scotland. WHITEHALL, JULY 8. , . The Queen has been pleased to present the Reverend Neil Mackenzie to the church at Duror, in the parish of Appin, in the presbytery of Lorn and shire of Argyll, vacant by . the transportation of the_ Rev. Donald M'Naughton late minister thereof, tO the church and parish of Killin, in the presbytery of Weem: Commission by the Lord Lieutenant of Derbyshire. Derby Militia.—Major. R. B. Leacroft to be Lieutenant- Colonel, vice Gladwin, deceased, June 27. The Lords Commissioners of her Majesty's Treasury having certified to the Commissioners for the Reduction of the Na tional Debt, in pursuance of the Act, 10th George IV., c. 27, sec. l, that the actual surplus revenue of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, beyond the actual expenditure thereof, for the year ended the sth day of April, 1844, amounted to the sum of two millions and ninety five thousand four hundred and twenty-seven pounds, nine shillings and sevenpence; the Commissioners for the Re duction of the National Debt hereby give notice, that the sum of five hundred and twenty-three thousand eight hundred and fifty-six pounds sev . enteeen shillings and fourpence (being one fourth part of the said surplus of two millions and ninety-five thousand tour hundred and twenty-seven pounds nine shillings and sevenpence) will be applied, under the provisions of the said Act, between the 7th day of July, 1844, and the 10th day of October, 1844, to the following purposes, viz. : £ - s. d. T 0 be applied to the purcbase of stock ... - 23,856 17 4 To be applied to the purchase of Exchequer Bills, made out in pursuance of the Act of • 57th George cap. ,48 533,856 17 4 Add Interest receivable on account of Dona tions and Bequests, to be applied to the purchase of Stock 3,546 6 10 £527,403 4 2 S. HIGH AM, Comptroller-General. National Debt-Office, July 5, 1844. BANKRUPTS. , CORNELIUS HEAV IS, carpenter, Shirley, Hampshire, to surrender July 16, at twelve, and August 24, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Follett, official assignee, Sambrook court, Basinghall-street; Hillier, Lewis, and Hillier, Ray mond-buildings, Gray's-Inn ; Usher, Sout hampton. AUGUSTUS PORT WAY, tea dealer, Braintree, Essex, July 16, at two, and August 20, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Belcher, official assignee, King's Arms-yard, Moorgate-street ; Hardwick and Davidson, Basinghall-street. JAMES PAGE, builder, Devonshire-terrace, Fulham road, July 16, at half-past one, and Aug. 8, at .eleven, at the Court.tof Bankruptcy. Pennell, official assignee, Basinghall street ; Richardson, Smith, and Jones, Golden-square. HARRY MORGAN SHAW, jeweller, Newport, Isle of Wight, July 16, and Aug. 21, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Bell, official assignee, Coleman-street-buildings ; Taylor and Collisson, Great James-street, Bedford-row. ALBERT POTTER, carpet manufacturer, Kidderminster, July 17, at half-past eleven, and Aug. 14, at one, at the Bir mingham District Court. Valpy, official •assignee, Binning. ham ; Boycott and Lucy, Kidderminster; Reece, Birmingham. JOHN - CROWDER and JOHN GREEN, jun., trimming manufacturers, Macclesfield, July 24, at one, and Aug. 9, at eleven, at the-Manchester District Court. Pott, official as signee, Manchester ; Hawker, Leek ; Oliver, Manchester ; Falcon, Elm-court, Temple, London: • . WILLIAM COWARD, baker, Hartlepool, Durham, July 15, at eleven, and Aug. 26, at one, at the Newcastle-upon- Tyne District Court. Baker, official assignee, Newcastle upon- T)ne ; Haag,- Newcastle-upon- Tyne ; Chisholme, Hall, and Gibson, Lincoln's Inn-fields, London. JACOB WOOD and WILLIAM NORTON, fancy cloth manufacturers, Kirkheaton Yorkshire, July 19, and Aug. 9, at eleven , _at the Leeds District Court. Fearne, official as signee, Leeds; Lever, King's •road, Bedford-row, London ; Robinson, Huddersfield ; Sanderson, Leeds. CHARLES BENJAMIN RENOLDS, tailor, Devizes, July 23, at twelve, and Aug. 23, at eleven, at the Bristol Die trier Court, Hutton, official assignee, Bristol ; Turner, Ba singhall.street, London. . - NOTICES OF INSOLVENCY. R. Nash, Great Yarmouth. A. G. Hamilton, agent, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. C. Harding, schoolmaster, Wakefield-street, Gray's Inn-lane. D. Robinson, boot maker, Althorpe, Lincolnshire. R. M'Gregor, coa,ch-wheel maker, Manchester. _ S. B. Parsons,_York-road, Lambeth. T. S. Dear, baker, Bow-street, Covent-garden. J. Mash, co al dealer 'Hoxton Old Town. J. Williams, silk dealer, Sclater-street, Bethnal-green. G. Brown, blacksmith,,Blaldon, Essex. J. Drake, boot maker, Halifax, Yorkshire. J. Cottee, cabinet maker, Maldon, Essex. J. Brown, hackney driver, Liverpool. M. Miy, silk _velvet manufacturer, Fuller-street, Bethnal-green. H. Cosins, furniture broker, Water-st., Arundel-st., Strand. F. Newenhava, artist, Soho-square. T. Rogers, tailor, New North-street, Red Lion-square. J. Rason, blacksmith, Liverpool. G. Bristow, sen., carpenter, Little George-street, Bermondsey. J. Oakes, traveller, Liverpool. - J. Drinkhall, porter, Manchester. J. R. Miller, estate agent, Liverpool. W. Roffey, dancing master, Elm-lane, Bayswater. J. F. Redshaw, upholsterer, Great Portland-street. . C. Pashley, plumber, Rayleigh, Essex. J. Faithfull, gardener, Grove-end-road, St. John's-wood. W. and G. S. Scoble, bakers, Topsham, Devonshire. R. Wellicombe, butcher, Churcb-street, Camberwell. S. Gale, Bottontstrect, Dorset-square. G. Heffill, tailor, Chenies-street, Bedford-square. W. Childs, grocer, Bury St. Edmund's, Suffolk. T. C. BliA, surgeon - Islip, Oxfordshire. A. Clarance, potato dealer, Romford. J. Allansen, corn miller, Kirby Malzeard, Yorkshire. W. Smallwood, pawnbroker's shopman, Manchester. J. Birley, commission agent, Bawtry, Yorkshire. J. Fleming, carpenter, Halifax. MARKET INTELLIGENCE. (From the Landon-New Price Current of July 9.) SeGAR.—To day importers of Colonial Sugar manifested more firmness, and refrained from offering any description at public sale. There was more inclination shown on the part of Grocers and Refiners to operate in West India and a large business was transacted at the rates of Friday, and in some cases a small advance was paid for good and fine yellow. REFINED.—To-day several parcels of Refined Sugar were taken by the home trade, but at lower rates—brown lumps selling at 71s to 725, standard lumps 73s 6d to 74s per cwt. Bonded Crushed Sugar is wanted at 26s per cwt, but not much is to be had. MAUElTlUS.—lmporters continue to be anxiovs sellers, and having supplied the market largely, has produces l a decline on previous rates of is to is 6d per cwt. This afternoon there was no public sale, but 8,000 bags will be broLght for ward on Friday; the business . transacted privately, was at former rates. EAST INDIA.—By private contract several parcels of Ben gal Sugar have been sold, but importers are compelled to submit to rather lower rates. This afternoon the principal. feature in the Foreign free labour Sugar market was the public sales of 1,294 baskets Java, and 1,548 bags of 1' ianilla, the former all sold at good prices, fine dry grey at 215.. to 22s 6d, mid yellow 17s 6d to 18s, good 18s 6d to 19s 6d, I km 20s to 21s 6d, good white 22s to 235, damp and washed 1 6s 6d to 22s ; the latter of sound quality all taken in at 1: Is Gd—a few lots of damaged sold at 13s to 17s 6d per cwt. 1 for Ben gal to-day stiffer rates paid. Fomocix.—This afternoon 460 brls Pernambuco, at , auction, were all taken in at 18s 6d to 19s fur yellow, an d 18s for broin, being above the value. By private treaty an .increased desire was shown, to purchase yellow Havannah , and two floating, cargoes, amounting to 4,000 boxes, wt =re sold at 19s 6d to 20s 6d per CNVI. MOLASSES.—West India at full prices; Antics' a at 25s to 27s ; St. Kitt's 22s to 23s ; and low gontserrat. 20s 6d per cwt. Bengal Molasses 16s to 17s per cwt.- CpFFEE.—West,lndia has been less in reque st, and im porters still supplying the market freely, has produced a declined on former rates of 2s per cwt. Mocha t 72s to 75s for good, and 68s to 71s per cwt for middling. This after noon ordinary Ceylon at 50s to 51s per cwt. Jai .uaica good middling fetched 102 s to 108 s, middling 'l3ss to I.:` - z6s 6d, low middling 80s, fine and fine fine ordinary '4o# to 74N 6d, triage 48 to 548 6d per cwt. • TEA.—There has been only a limited demand for black or green Tea, and holders experience difficulty in supporting former prices. To-day there was no variation in the prices of Tea, and few purchases were made in any description. COCOA.—For British Plantation, importers are unable to obtatn any advance in prices ; Grenada taken in at 42s per cwt. for good red. Foreign Cocoa is dull of sale, and may be purchased upon easier terms. This afternoon, Trinidad sold at 40s. for fair dark red. SPICES.—This afternoon there was no public sale of any deicription of Spice. By private treaty small parcels of common Sumatra Pepper were sold at 2id to 20 per lb. For Cassia Lignea there was rather more inquiry. RUM, BRANDY, AND HOLLANDS.—Leeward Island Rum at 2s 2id to 2s 3d per gallon proof strength ; Jamaida Rum 38 per cent. over proof, part faulty, sold at 3s 4d per gallon ; Demerara at 3s to 3s 4d per gallon for good to fine. Calcutta Rum at Is lid to Is 11Ad per gallon proof, with certificate. For Brandy, prices are drooping. Cognac, first brands of the vintage of 1838, hhds 5s 4d, puns 5s 2d ; ditto 1839 hhds 5s 2d' puns Ss ; ditto 1840, hhds 5s ld, puns 4s Ild ; ditto 1841, hhds ss, puns 4s 10d; ditto 1842, hhds 4s 9d, puns 4s 7d; and other descriptions 2s 8d to 4s 6d per gallon. Geneva at Is 9d.to Is 10d, and 'fine for home consumption 2s 6d to 3s 4d. To-day, Cognac, best brands of the vintage of 1842, at 4s 9d for hhds, and 4s 7d fer puns. English Corn Spirits lOs 4d per gallon for Cash. Geneva at Is 10d to Is lid per gallon for shipping. Leeward Island Rum at 2s 2d to 2s 3d per gallon proof. RICE.—In cleaned Rice several purchases made at 21s to 26s for Carolina, and 13s to 16s per cwt for Patna. This afternoon Bengal Rice went rather under former rates, good mid white Its to Ils 6d, and sea damaged first class 10s 6d to I ls. Java taken in at 9s 6d to 10s per cwt for bold sound .yellow. SAGO.—Prices have further declined for this article, and not much demand exists. Sago Flour 19s to 20s per cwt. ' Bermuda Arrowroot 5d to is lid, and Tapioca 5d per lb. INDIGO. —The quarterly sale of East India commenced to day. 826 chests have passed the sale. The biddings have been very brisk throughout the day for all qualities, except the good and fine, for which the demand was but limited. Ous.—Sperm Oil 801 15s to 831 lOs per tun. In common descriptions of Fish Oils the advanced rates previously esta blished are well sustained ; Pale Seal 35110 s to 365, and Cod 331 15s to 341; Southern at 31l 53 to 331 5s for middling to fine ; Cocoa Nat Oil is not offered at lower terms. Ceylon taken in at 30s per cwt for good quality. For Rape Oil prices are not so firm, pale at 38s, and brown 37s per cwt. Linseed Oil at 25s 9d to 26s per cwt on the spot. Olive Oil at further reduced rates. 461 to 47/, accepted for Gallipoli ; 44/ to 451 fer Spanish ; and 43/ to 43/ 10s per tan for Barbary ; Palm fine 28s to 29s per cwt. TALLow.—For Russian Tallow on the spot a good business has been transacted, P.Y. Candle 41s to 41s 6d per cwt. For delivery in the last three months of the year 42s 6d to 42s 9d. South American 37s 9d to 41s 3d; Town Tallow at 40s 6d to 41s per cwt. net cash. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. (THIS EVENING.) HOUSE OF LORDS. Their Lordships met at Five o'Clock. DISSENTERS CHAPELS' BILL. Lord BROUGHAM presented a petition from the Rev. Dr. Shepherd, in favour of the Dissenters Chapels' Bill. Lord RADNOR presented petitions in favour of the Dissenters Chapels Bill. Earl FITZJIARDINGE presented petitiocs from several congregations, against the Dissenters Cha pels Bill. The Bishop of LONDON presented petitions against the Dissenters Chapels Bill. The Earl of GALLOWAYpresented petitions against the Dissenters Chapels Bill. [LEFT SITTING•I HOUSE OF COMMONS. The House resumed at Fire o'clock. The report on the Great. South Western (Ireland) Railway Bill was further considered, and ordered to be engrossed. Mr. S. CRAWFORD presented a petition from Bridg water, praying for an extension of the suffrage. Mr. T. DUNCONIBE presented a petition from Islington, praying that existing railways may be com pelled to have third-class carriages, as well as future railways. NOTICES OF MOTIONS. Mr. HUMEa-v—eltodeC that he should that day three weeks make a motion respecting the correspondence between the British Government and the Raja of Sattara. IRELAND. ..---- - Mr. WYSE begged .. to give notice, that in accordance with an arrangement between himself and the Right Hon. Baronet at the head of her Majesty's Govern ment, it was his intention to defer his motion about the Irish State trial, which stood upon the paper for that evening, until Monday next, which, being . a Government day, the Right Honourable Baronet (Sir R. Peel) had himself• conceded to him. He had further to give notice that his other motion which also stood upon that day's paper, and which had reference to the University of Dublin and the College of Maynooth, he should likewise defer until the vote for Maynooth came regularly before the House. Could the Right Hon. Baronet inform him when he pro posed to go into a Committee of Supply. Sir R. PEEL said, after the kind manner in.which, on a former occasion, the Right Honourable Gentleman (Ur. Wyse) had waived his right of precedence at the request of the Government, he felt bound to place the .earliest day possible after the hearing of the appeal in the other House at the disposal of the Right Hon. Member.—(llear, hear.) As to the question which bad been put to him, he was not prepared at that moment to state when he pioposed to go into a Committee of Supply, but in the course of .the present week he would endeavour to name a day for- that purpose. SHAREHOLDERS IN RAILWAYS. Mr. WALLACE gave notice that when the House divided on the Railway Bill, he should propose that the names of - Hon. Members interested in any of those un dertakings should not be received. He would take the directors first, and the shareholders second.—(Loud laughter.) He begged to inquire of the Speaker what would be the proper time and course to take in this matter f as there was a difference of opinion upon the subject.—(Loud laughter.) The SPEAKER said the: proper time for making the objection was after the tellers:hadtakenthe numbers, but before the , numbers were declared from the chair. . POOR LAW. Captain PECHELL gave t otice that on bringing up the._report of the Pour Law . Amendrnent Bill he should more the omission of the 11th clause, which assigned the duty of apprenticing pauper children to the Poor Law Commissioners, instead of the Board of Guardians. • ittpr•OFFICE COMMITTEE. Lord BANDON moved that a message be sent to the Lords, requesting that the Marquis of Lansdowne, the Earl of Lonsdale, and the Earl of Besborough, might attend to be examined before the Secret Committee on opening the letters at the Post -office.—Agreed to. • GUERNSEY. Mr. T. DUNCOMBE would, if there were no objec tion, at once move for copies of the correspondence which had taken place between the Home Secretary and the. Lieutenant-Governor of Guernsey, since the Ist August last. Sir JAMES GRAHAM said that the same reason which had induced the Honourable Gentleman to post pone the motion of which he had given notice, on the subject of the affairs of Guernsey, still existed. The whole of the circumstances connected with the recent unfortunate disputes in Guernsey would speedily be brought judicially under the notice of the Committee of the Privy Council • and while th a t cause was pending, be thought it would not be for the interest of the pub lic service to prciduce the correspondence. Mr. T. DUNCOMBE would postpone his motion until this day fortnight. MESSAGE FROM THE LORDS—POST-OFFICE. Messengers from the Lords brought down certain Bills, and also brought down a message requesting that permission might_be given to Lord John Russell and to Sir "James Graham to attend before the Lords' Corn mittee on the Post-office, in order to be examined. The" SPEAKER informed the Messengers that the House would send an answer by Messengers of its own. TRISH MARRIAGES BILL. Sir JAMES GRAHAM moved the first reading of the Irish Presbyterian Marriages Bill, which had been brought'down from the Lords.---Agreed to. . DANISH CLAIMS. Mr. CHRISTIETose - iO submit his motion on the Danish claims, of which he had given notice :—" That this House do resolve itself into a Committee, to consider of an address to her Majesi.y, praying that she will be graciously pleased to take into her early and most favourable consideration the case of the claimants for losses sustained by the seizure of British ships and cargoes by the Danish Government in 1807, and reported to have been established by the Commissioners, to whom it was referred to examine and adjudicate on all such claims, in their report bearing date the 12th day of May, 1840: He said, this question had been so often before the House that I shall be justified in doing that which I should otherwise have done as a matter of policy, and detain the House but a short time in sealing with the subject. I cannot but remember that when this ques tion was formerly brought forward in this House, it came recommended by all the weight of the talents and great abilities of Mr. Cresswell. After that gentleman cm! ed to be a Member of this House, it was brought forward by the Hon. Member for Gateshead (Mr. Hutt). That gentleman's avocations, however, presented him from bringing it forward this session. This is the reason that I am here to undertake it. I expect, of course, to hear it said that it is high time we should have done with these Danish claims.—(hear, hear.) That it is a very old motion Which has ben often discussed. But tbeg to remind the House in the present state of the 'question, that these are the third and last of three els saes of claims, the first two of which have been satis- IY:d, first one and then the other, but both after long 'aid determined opposition from succeeding Governments; and that this third and last class of claims have already had their justice affirmed by majorities of this House. I know it will be said that on the last occasion when the question was brought forward by the Hon. Member for Larnbeth (Mr. Hanes) he was in a minority. I know that he expected a larger majority than had ever before been recorded in support of his motion, but to his great sur prise he found himself in a minority. But still the Danish' claims put forward four victories in opposition to this minority ; and whatever opinion the Chancellor of the Exchequer, as an individual, may entertain on this subject—and I know that Right Hon. Gentleman has always, both in and out of office, consistently voted against those claims—l am sure he cannot deny that there must be some strength, even if not suffi cient strength, in claims which have before been so earnestly and perseveringly advocated by so dis tinguished a member of his own party as Mr. Creswell, and supported by so large a number of members of his own party, and which, on several occasions, have been supported by Members of the present Government. At different times I find that no less than ten Members of the present Government have sided for these claims. I am sorry to see that several of ttiose Members are.not now in the House; but I begin by rMlticei n g's the name of the Noble Lord, the Secretary for Ireland, whoni, I see, in his place. I believe I am correct in stating that the Noble Lord the Secretary for Ireland, who began by opposing the Danish claims, after giving more mature attention to the sub ject, in the year 1841 voted in their favour, but voted against them when they were brought forward last year. The Hon. Member for Wenlock, a Lord of the Trea sury, who voted on three successive occasions in their favour, and the Honourable Member for Belfast, were away from the division. Next, there was the Solicitor-General, who, I presume, investigated those elaims with a lawyer's mind, and who, I hope, will give his assistance on this occasion. Next, there were the Hon. Member for Selkirk, the Hon. and . Gallant Member for Chippenham, the Hon. Member for Southampton, who was Under Secretary for the Colo- _ nies, and the Hon. and Gallant Member for Scarborough, who, in 1838, said, " I shall support this motion, as it is not a question as to the length of time which has elapsed, but whether the House will do justice. No time will be allowed as a bar against justice." The last on the list is the Right Honourable Gentleman the Member for Kent. Under these circumstances, I hope it will be admitted that the Danish claimants are justified in once more bringing forward their claims, if only to ascertain whether the adverse majority by which they were met last year after several successive victories, was the result of accident or not? and whether the Government really intended, after the encourage ment which was given to the claimants on previous occasions, to persevere in making a question of this sort, involving the pecuniary claims of individuals, which to some individuals is a question of thousands of pounds, and to others involving a question of comfort or beggary for the remainder of their -lives, whether such a question is really to be made a party question and an officicial question. These claims, as is well known, arose out of the Well known capture of the Danish fleet off Copenhagen in 1807, when we were at peace with Denmark. An English fleet suddenly appeared off the coast of Denmark, and the Danish fleet fell into our hands. In consequence of this capture, Denmark made reprisals, and seized the property of British sub jects, taking our merchant ships in the Baltic by way of reprisal. From the date of the 15th of August to the middle of December no declaration of war was made. In that interval the ships of the claimants, whom I represent, were seized, and for that seizure they claimed compen sation. At that time there were British ships in the harbour of Copenhagen, the owners of those ships having had no intimation that there was any likelihood of war, from the secret manner in which the hostile proceedings of this country were carried on ; and they came to their own Govern ment for compensation, as individuals who lied suffered for the public benefit. In other cases, also, losses were sustained in the Baltic Sea, in conseqnence of the sudden and unauthorised withdrawal (by the Admiral) of the fleet which went out from England as a protection for those ships, destined to Russian and other ports in the Baltic. The owners of those ships say that they have, on this ground, an additional claim for com pensation, because they suffered their losses in con sequence of the conduct of the officer under whose guard these vessels went out. Those for whom I appear say that they have a claim for compensation, on the ground that their property was seized by way of reprisal, that being a case in which the right of the sufferers to compensation is established. What is the answer ? It is said that the property of the claimants was not taken by way of reprisal, but that during all this time we were at war with Denmark, and that the losses of the claimants did not come under the same catagory as book-debts,and ships and cargoes in har bour. Now, how is it proved that we were during this time at war with Denmark ? Why, a document is brought for ward, not from the Foreign-office, but from the Anneal Register, and it is said that that is a declaration of war. last year my Hon. Friend the Member for Lambeth moved for the production of this document in the original, with an authentic translation ; and it now turnsout that this document, on which so much stress has been laid, has been mistranslated, and that the most warlike word in the translation is not warranted by the original. In the " Annual Register " it appears that there had been an order to seize all English ships as well as all English goods and merchandise. Now, if there had been an order to seize ships, goods, and merchandise, that would not perh'aps, of itself, be sufficient to turn the document into a formal declaration of war; but certainly an order to seize, or in other words, to confiscate, would be an order to institute a proceeding which was only authorised after there. had been a declaration of war. In this way it might be ar gued, but the. documented amounted to a declaration of war. It turns out, however, the word or words trans lated in the Annual Register, " to seize," mean no more than to lay an embargo on the ships • and the difference between an order for an embargo and an order to seize or confiscate goods is a very wide one. There are many other reasons why this document should not be considered as a declaration of war. The only allu sion to war in the whole paper is in the • preamble, whereas, if the document had been a declaration of war, words, showing it to be so, would have appeared in the body of the document. Besides, it is . not a document formally addressed to our Government, as it would have been in the case supposed, but merely to the subjects of the King of Denmark; and not to all the subjects- of tire-King,' but only to a . portion of them. Again, it did not emanate from the central seat of Government, but from a province, and this a very important circum stance. Besides these proofs that the documentlis not to be considered as a declaration of war, there are many others which are scarcely less strikin. For instance, on the very day on which it is dated, viz., the 16th of August, an order appeared at Copenhagen, and about that order—l do not know whether or not the Right Hon. Gentleman is aware of it—about that order there can be no doubt that' it in a simple order to sequester property. In the capi tulation of Copenhagen, on the 7th of September, one of the articles relates to the English property which has been not seized, or confiscated, but sequestered. On the 23d of October a remonstrance was agreed upon, in reference to the order of seqUestration. The Danish Minister remained at our Court till the middle of November, 1807. Was not that totally inconsistent with our being at war? And so late as December, the 13th of December, in that year the King of Denmark issued a proclama tion, in answer to merchants who had asked him to authorise the correspondence with England, in which he says the King, in confining himself to the sequestration of property, had done all in his 'sewer to assist their mis fortunes. The merchants at once, by becoming privateers, might recover their property, and that was alter, he had stated he had authorised sequestration, he authorised reprisals on English pioperty. Were the circum stances that had taken place between France and Morocco, a state of reprisals or war? M. Guizot, in the French Chamber, said that war had not been announced, but that the attacks that had taken place had rendered reprisals necessary, and that a strong force had been sent against some of the Moorish towns which had been taken. The argu ment derived from this document in the Annual Register, that it was a declaration of war, was entirely errroneous ; that being so, the distinction that was set up between the claims satisfied and those that remained to be satisfied, fell entirely to the ground. But I will suppose that there had been a declaration of war, would that have deprived these parties of their claims. They had no reason for supposing that the war had not been brought on in a regular way, but in a peculiar manner. There is an instance, also, of individuals who have ap plied to the Admiralty for licenses for ships to call at the Danish, and other ports, and those licenses were granted, not only during the time, but afterwards. (LEFT SPEAKING.) THE HAIR.—Of the numerous compounds con stantly announced for promoting the growth or reproduc tion of the hair, few survive, even in name, beyond a very limited period; whilst " Rowland's Macassar Oil," with a reputation unparalleled, is still on the increase in public es timation. The singular virtues of this successful invention for restoring, preserving, and beautifying the human hair, are too well known and appreciated to need much comment. The very facts of the high and distinguished patronage it enjoys, its general use in all countries, together with nu merous testimonials constantly received in its favour, Are au thorities which stamp its superior excellence and title over all attempts of a similar nature. Being universally preferred, its consequent great demand excites the cupidity of un principled shopkeepers, who vend the most spurious trash as the "genuine" Macassar Oil : whereas the genuine article is wholly the invention and property of A. Rowland and Son, and the amalgamation of its costly exotic materials rencjers abortiveany attempt to discover its component parts—thus proving the imposition of all other articles bearing the title of " Macassar Oil." The genuine article has the words " Rowland's Macassar Oil" on the wrapper.—All others are fraud ule counterfeits! SIGHT AND HEARING.—n, Albemarle-street, Picca dilly. Newly-invented spectacles, telescopes, opera glasses, microscopes, &c. Patronised by Generals Sir Edward Paget, Sir Evan Lloyd, Frederick Meister, Clayton, Galway, Grosvenor, Morrison, Dyott, Robert son, and Mackenzie ; Major-Generals Sir H. Elphin - stone, P. Fyers, D. Macleod, Hamilton, and Wemyss ; Lieut.-Generals Sir Henry Bonverie, Sir J. Macdonald, Sir R. Barton, Sir T. Dallas, Lord John Hay ; Admirals Sir George Cockburn, Sir George Munday, Sir G. Martin, Sir James H. Whitshed, Sir D. Gold, and Ross. By the use of these newly-invented spectacles, imperfect vision becomes preserved and strengthened, and very aged persons are enabled to employ their sight at the most minute occupation, and can see with those lenses of a much less magnifying power, nor will they require the frequent changes to further helps ; also newly-invented achromatic waistcoat-pocket telescopes and opera glasses. Every kind of telescope of larger size with increasing powers, for shooting, sea purposes, and, upon stands, for astronomical purposes, with the same celebrated lenses, the powers are so great, and the lenses so bright and brilliant, that minute objects at an extraordinary distance are brought completely under the eye. Sportsmen, tourists, and sea-side visitors will have a great treat. Their invisible voice conductor gives immediate relief to old standing extreme eases of deaf ness. Caution—Messrs. S. and B. Solomons, opticians and aurists, are not in any way connected with a person of the same name in their immediate neighbonrhood, nor in any part of the country. To prevent mistakes be cautious and observe, only to be had at 39, Albemarle street, Piccadilly, opposite the York Hotel. HOARSENESS.—One drachm of freshly scraped horse radish root, to be infused with four ounces of wa ter, in a close vessel, for two hours, and made into a syrup, with double its weight in vinegar, is an improved remedy for hoarseness ; a teaspoonful has often proved effectual ; a few teaspoonfuls, it is said, have never been known to fail in removing hoarsenesg. ..—... _ _ Dispatches were received yesterday at the Colonial-office, from the Governor of the Mauritius. At the Livefpool Police-court, the other day, one man was fined 9s. 6d., and another 55., for smoking in the street, opposite warehouses stowed s4.th cotton. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. TATTERSALL'S—YESTERDAY. The settling of the Epsom accounts was resumed yester day, and notwithstanding the large sums that were hedged between Running Rein and Orlando, proved one of the most unsatisfactory ever known. Several parties did not appear either in person or by proxy,. nor, except from one, who, a heavy loser, attributes his inability to meet his engagements to a mercantile failure, was any communication whatever re ceived from them. The absence of two or three of those persons is good-naturedly attributed to ignorance of the time fixed for settling, although made public in all the daily papers on Friday last, and copied into most of the weekly and provincial journals ; this plea, therefore, cannot be allowed, and for their neglect to make any provision . for the settlement, no excuse whatever can be made—it is in the highest degree reprehensible. Of two other cases no hopes whatever are entertained; it was well known long ago that they would be "wanted " if Orlando won, and no one is in the least surprised at their absence. Their deficiencies, and the state of abeyance in which the late Mr. Crockford's book remains, had a most disheartening influence on the settlement (all the accounts having been more or less dis arranged, and several parties—good winners on the 'race— obliged, in consequence, to leave the room considerably out of pocket. The only way to prevent this very usual conse quence of extravagant and indiscriminate " book-making" is, without regard to rank or station, to adopt the "black board," and post, not only actual defaulters, but all who fail to attend or make arrangements for paying and receiving, on the regular settling days. The betting commenced late in the afternoon, and, limited as it was in extent, led to two or three important changes. JULY STAKES (THIS DAY). Old England the favourite, but no price fixed. LIVERPOOL CUP. 6 to 1 agst kr. Meiklam's Aristotle—taken . GOODWOOD STAKES. 7 to 1 agst Mr. Wreford's Franchise—taken 10 to 1 agst Lord G. Bentinck's Croton Oil 12 to 1 agst Duke of Richmond's Red Deer—taken 14' to 1 agst Col. Peel's Canton—taken 15 to 1 agst Colonel Anson's Parthian 18 to 1 agst Mr. Shelley's Lucy Banks 18 to 1 agst Lord Exeter's Elegance filly 20 to 1 agst Sir S. Spry's Subduer 25 to 1 agst Mr. Meiklam's Poussin—taken GOODWOOD CUP. 6 to. 4 agst Mr. Salvin's Alice Hawthorn 8 to 1 agst Mr. Bell's The Squire 12 to 1 agst Mr. Herbert's:Antler ST. LEGER. 3 to 1 agst Mr. Williamson's The Cure—taken 8 to 1 agst Lord Stanley's Ithuriel—takeu 15 to 1 agst Mr. Irvine's Foig-a-ballagh—taken DERBY, 1845. 30 to 1 agst Mr. S. Stanley's Virago colt—taken 40 to 1 agst Mr. S. Stanley's Minikin colt—taken 40 to 1 agst Lord Eglinton's Lyeurgus—taken Bastion, who was quoted by ns last week,. is, and has for considerable period been, the property of Mr. Hook, not of Mr. Gregory, in whose name he appeared by mistake. THE Loss of THE MANCHESTER.—By the ar rival of the Duchess of Lonsdale, General Steam Navigation Company's steamer, with the Hamburgh mail of Wednesday, it is ascertained that the wreck of the ill-fated Manchester steamer, which was discovered lying at the extreme end of the Reissen Sands, to the northward of the Elbe, in about twelve feet of water, has gradually disappeared by the breakers making over it and destroying it by piecemeal. Two bodies, one a female and the other a male, have been cast on the beach, and are supposed to have been part of the unfortunate creatures who perished with the vessel. Mrs. St. George Smith, of Drogheda, her daughter, and the stew ardess, being the only females that were on board the Man chester at the time, it is presumed that the body is one of them. It was only attired in a night-dress and chemise, from which circumstance it is inferred that she was at rest when the loss of the vessel took place. The other body is that of a man, and is judged to have been one of the crew. The Directors of the Hanseatic Steam Navigation Company, to whom the Manchester belonged, arc still instituting a strict inquiry concerning the deplorable catastrophe, but as yet have not' been able to trace out the exact bearing where the unfortunate property was sacrificed. That she was lost on the end of the Reissen Sands, where her wreck was seen, there are considerable doubts, from the fact of her anchors arid chain cable, which, from their massive descrip tion, would not drift, being not fbund on the spot, and the singular circumstance of her lying in twelve feet of water, the extent of her draught when laden. It is, however, very evident to most mariners, that the primary cause of the loss was by her going too far to the northward of the harbour, a conclusion which the most experienced pilots on the Elbe have arrived at. It has also been [said that her being formed what is termed "wall built," thereby being doubly difficult to bring round in stormy weather, prin cipally occasioned her speedy wreck ; in answer to which, her builder is firmly of opinion that her loss did not occur through any fault in her construction. She was only launched in 1841, and the repeated excellent passages she made in bad weather,' between Hull and llamburgh, clearly proved her to be a sound and expeditious sea-boat. THE BOY JONES AGAIN.—The following is an ex tract from a letter received in this town from an officer of her Majesty's ship Warspite, dated off Gibraltar, 16th June. The writer was formerly resident in Leeds, and there is no doubt of the authenticity of the letter :—" One little incident oc curred between Tunis and Algiers, the relation of which may perhaps prove interesting. I think I have never informed you that the boy Jones (the interesting chimney-Sweep, who so ingeniously contrived to secrete himself in the private apartments 'of her Majesty, at' Buckingham Palace), is, and has been for two or three years, on board the Wars/site, in the capacity of a first-class boy. After contrary winds during nearly the whole of ourpassage between the two places above named, we were one night becalmed (at all events the ship was only making a knot and a half an hour). Now, on fine nights, I very frequently remain on the upper deck during the greater part of the first watch, listening to the various songs with which the men generally beguile away the monotony of the time in calm weather, and on this night I was thus en joying myself, when about seven bells (half-past eleven o'clock), we were startled by the soul-stirring cry of 'A man overboard!' which was immediately followed by the usual hoarse bawls of the boatswain's mate of the watch, Away, first and second cutters.' A general rush aft took place, some seizing the bight of a rope, others springing on the ham mock netting, and straining their eye-balls tocatch a sight of the unfortunate individual. A marine is usually stationed on the poop at the life-buoy, but the after part of the watch had been called to alter the trim of t he spanker, and as is usual, he was assisting. Fortunately,' however, our Captain's clerk, Mr. Hall, was enjoying the coolness of the night air on the poop, and he promptly let go the life -buoy, which blazed away with a steady beautiful . light, and dropped considerably astern immediately. The cutters were lowered after a little con fusion, and pulled for the buoy, where they found no less a person than Master Jones, who was holding on with one hand, and dashing the sparks (arising from the port-fire) from his face with the other. As they approached, he sung out—` Here lam ; look lively.' They quickly succeeded in getting him into one of the boats, the other taking the buoy in tow. When brought on board, he was questioned by the lieutenant of the watch, and stated that he had fallen out of the mizen rigging accidentally ; but the ship's crew arc of opinion that, if it had been a rough night, young Jones would not have gone overboard at all—they all think that he jumped overboard. and that for no other purpose than to see the life buoy light burning, and this is in some measure confirmed by . the fact of his bawling out when falling A man overboard,' and again, when immersed, Let go the life-buoy.' How ever, he is a singular character, and the thing is not at all unlikely."-Leeds Mercury. SPACE ANNIHILATED.—THE MAGNETIC TELE GRAPH.—The magnetic telegraph is now in full opera thin between the cities of Washington and Baltimore. The following examples will show the manner in which this instrument annihilates both time and space :—" On , Saturday morning the batteries were charged, and the regular transmission of intelligence between Wash ington and Baltimore commenced, as we learn from the Baltimore Patriot. A large number of gentlemen were present to see the operations of this truly astonish ing contrivance. Many admitted to the room had their names sent down; and in less than a second the appa ratus in Baltimore was put in'operation by the attendant ,in Washington, and before the lapse of a half minute the same names were returned plainly written. At half-past eleven o'clock, A.M., the question being asked What the news was at Washington ?" the answer was almost instantaneously returned—' Van Buren stock is rising'—meaning, of course, that his chances were strengthening to receive the nomination on Mon day next. The time of day was also inquired for, when the response was given from the capitol, forty-nine minutes past eleven.' At this period it was also asked how many persons were spectators to the telegraphic experiments in Washington ? The answer was six teen ;' after which a variety of names were sent up from Washington, some with their compliments to their friends in Baltimore, whose names had just been transmitted to them. Several items of private intelligence were also transmitted back Wards and forwards, one of which was an order to an agent in Baltimore not to pay a certain bill. The electric fluid proved too slow, for it had been,paid a few minutes before. At half-past twelve, the following was sent to Washington :—" Ask a reporter in Congress to send a dispatch to the Balt:snore Patriot, at two r.n.' In about a minute the answer came back thus—' It will be attended to.' Two o'clock, P.3l.—Tho dispatch has arrived, and is as follows :—' One o'clock ; there has just been a motion in the House to go into committee of the whole on the Oregon territory. Re jected ; Ayes, 79 ; 'noes, 862—Half-past one : The house is now engaged on private Bills."—" Quarter to two : Mr. Atherton is now speaking in the Senate. Mr. S. will not be in Baltimore to-night.' So that Bal tiniore papers are thus enabled to give their readers in formation from Washington up to the very hour of going to press. This is indeed the annihilation of space."—New York Daily Sun.—[The distance between Baltimore and Washington is 34 miles.] DISGRACEFUL SCENE IN ST. JOHN'S CHURCHYARD, WATERLOO-ROAD —Yesterday afternoon, between three and four o'clock, a dreadful occurrence took place during the usual hours for interment in the ground of the above church, and while the Rev. Mr. Irvine was performing the burial service, and a number of persons .were waiting for the performance of the service over their deceased relatives and friends, the funeral procession of a child belonging to a poor Irish labourer entered the ground, accompanied by a vast number of Irish Roman Catholics, as is their usual custowi, and proceeded to the grave which had been allotted for its interment. On arriving at the spot, the Rev. Mr. Johnson commenced the usual service, a practice which is not in these grounds permitted to be passed over ; the Reverend Gentleman had no soonerutlered the first sentence than a number of Irishmen rushed forward, and using terrible oaths and disgusting language, seized a number of shovels, and declared in violent language that no service should be read over the corpse, and that they would split the head of any one who attempted it. The Rev. Mr. John son, from their excited manner, being apprehensive of vio lence, left the grave, the boards were torn up, and one man thrown upon 'the coffin, and a violent struggle commenced between the authorities of the ground and their assailants, during which the grave was nearly filled up, and it was not until the police had interfered and removed the most active and violent of the party that anything like order could be obtained, and the Reverend Gentlemen enabled to proceed with their sacred duties, when the parents of the deceased and their followers permitted the Rev. Mr. Irvine to perform the service, and the parties quietly retired, finding further resist ance useless. BOAT UPSET.—FIVE LIVES LOST.—On the even ing of Monday, the 24th ult., one of the boats engaged in the cod and ling fishing at Ness, Island of Lewis, was upset, and fire of the crew perished, only one being saved. Three of them have left wives and families to lament their loss.—lnverness Cow ier. NOT TO BE GRAHAMED—is the inscription on a dozen different varieties of fancy wafers, attached to the letters we have received from our correspondents in an parts to-day.--HampAire Independent. ROWING 'MATCH. The great boat race for a purse of sixty sovereigns, 0 16 by the Duke and Duchess of Buccleuch, who have frequent l y bcen the donors of large sums of money for competition ell the Thames, took pl ace yesterday.. The task of selection such men as would afford first-rate sport had been entrustc! to Castles, one of her Majesty's watermen, who very ably a" impartially discha r g e d th e d u ty, by picking an equal ntimb! r from above and below bridge, and lotting them together in pairs. In the list were to . be found Charles Campbell, t be ex-champion ;. Robert Newel, who rowed against Robe rt Coombes fur that enviable di s tinction ; F. Lett, E. Mayilaw , ' and others, with whose names as first-Late men the pubb are familiar. ..... The anticipation of good sport produced the largest cod course of persons that we have witnessed for a length time at any corresponding e x hibiti on . I n d e p en dently of tir s brilliant and fashionable assemblage on the lawn of Grace's mansion, the craft on either shore vas covered iv" th spectators; there were hundreds of boats of e very de,noroins tion afloat, and IVcstrninster-'iridge, to the imminent risk many of the most ventrucsom,?, one - mass of Anxious sp ec. tutors. as p The race was with eight r* of oars, in three heats , 11 ..4 was, we regret to say, what is termed a fair w aternit t wager, or, in plainer words, one in which fouling is allo w :: a,practice reprehended of late by leading gentlemen 5 7, teurs, and from very good reason, as it bet too frequ e !We occurs that under its conditions indifferent men carry ja g prize, whilst those of more pretensions are engaged in i l l their skill at fouling. Shortly after four o'clock the sports commenced. ' FIRST HEAT. Frederick Lett, Lambeth, W. Robins, Battle:bridge , Horslevdown, crimson ......................................... Francis Braithwaite, Hungerford, Thomas Baker, Hors leydown, stripes . ............................................... 3 Thomas Cook, Hungerford, Richard Robinson, yellow ••• 4 David Ceombes, Millbank, J. Morgan, Horsleyd'own, blue tn j The men started from off the Earl of Liverpool's, up W oo Lucas's barge road (just below the Horseferry), down to 4 Eatl of Liverpool's, up again to the barge road, and fini s . u ,,% by returning to Montagu House. On the signal being 0 00 - 0 blue took the lead at a rattling pace, followed by cri m be , and stripes. After a few strokes the two leading boats to came oar and oar, and in the return down from Lucas's 1. 1 0 ; crimson had the lead, and maintained it throughout, wio etp easily. Blue, despite the efforts of the rowers, dropped 85 ` after the first round, giving place to yellow. SECOND HEAT. Charles Campbell, Westminster-bridge, Percival Scott, Battle-bridge, white ...................................... . ..... R. Newel, Battle-bridge, G. Saunders, Hungeribrd, green G. Maynard, Lambeth, Wm. Whitlock, 'Wapping, black Edward Maynard, Lambeth, Edward Stocks, Liniehousep pink............................................................... .. for A good start was effected, and they were oar and car, a few yards. Green then took the lead, closely followet‘l4 white, and a gallant race followed for the first place, 'giro white obtained off the Duke of Buccleuch's, on the re‘, o l, down against tide for the first time. White held the i! e i winning by two lengths. The third boat was half adu lengths astern of the second. GRAND HEAT. This was a most indifferent affair. They.wero oar 5 : 0 4 . Or oar for a dozen yards; then crimson - showed ahead, b and white being abreast of each other. Immediately 0 0t o arrival at the barge head for the first time, the two 1.L..y fouled, and continued together, while crimson rowed leis ahead, followed by stripes. .The fouling between gree ll o ill white continued for some time, but within about half 1., 440 , of the winning post, green shook their opponents off. ` - ''if son won easily, stripes second, green third, a large astern. aft' We had almost omitted to state that Newell and hi" Pd ner will receive the second prize, although stripes eaTii v el next to the winners; the reason for this being that B pi did not come to the starting post at the time the others: off, and are, therefore, not recognised as being in the rail' FATAL ACCIDENT AT ;WATERLOO-BRIDGE. O O evening, Mr. Higgs held an inquest ;at the Green Dr"' Villiers-street, Strand, on the body of Albert Walker , 1 4 five years. William James Myers, a waterrnan, 14° 1 :0 at Waterloo-bridge stairs, said that on .Saturday after n n ieof between three and four o'clock,. he was on the floating r to g, near Somerset House, when a boy came to him an d - r soi him a child was in the water near the north-west so' bo st the bridge. He went to the spot, and getting into the ; t ol of another waterman, and assisted by the latter, heloo,l the body within twelve feet of the stairs. It was alive got out of the water, and they rowed to the Savoy, 0;411 ashore and took the child to Mr. Scott, a surgeon, close by. Mr. Scott looked at -the child, and exclaii?l,o " Be off with you—take it to Charing Cross Hospital ] witness added " The child was alive when under roof, and he might have saved it in ten .minutes:' ~r 0 4 . v whilst the witness was taking it to the hospital. .- 1 -" c r oil l ness added that he was "an experienced p r actition t t# these matters,• having since the year '9B . picked up D d . te, Thames forty-four persons whose lives were saved, an bodies that were lifeless. Mr. Golding, house-surge ° ,o l . Charing-cross Hospital, said the child was brough t in 'V a tittle after four o'clock,' and that for upwards of 3n a t'iov every means were tried without effect to restore anim..eoii He was of opinion that the child had been dead o.lof minutes or half an hour when he was brought to the pital. The first witness said that the child's h eart °s , when it was taken to Mr,Scott's. Mr. Golding ('2, 0 o', to a juror)—lf there was pulsation of the heart bo child was at Mr. Scott's, it might have been revive': /' whether it would have lived ultimately, I cannot ss.P g oll was proved by another child that deceased was PI B JI II O the steps of the stairs, and accidentally slipped i° f lo g water. The jury here sent the beadle for Dr. Scar , 14° 10 Al, alined coming, but 'sent Mr. Pine, a medical man , ,;;', c', in his shop when the witness Myers brought in he slot' Mr. Pine said the child was dead 'when brought tc7 o and that Dr. Scott having at hand no convenienq,„ hosP",; animation, advised Myers to take the child to t' . 'whither witness accompanied it. Dr. Scott el -a— t , he a " child, and Myers was drunk. Myers denied Oa the bo dy' , drunk, and swore that Dr. Scott did not examine Verdict, " Accidentally drowned." iT PICTURES FOR THE NATIONAL GALLER o ,_,t masters, for the. 4 o l p Gr u o r v e e h r s n e i e s n o t me h s a t s ,,r t n ir g s , o , m ar e t i ks tional Gallery, and, acting under the advice of an 00 10 d old it in contemplatlr e artist, the opportunity was offered on Saturday, whe n o n f ie tl of some choice pictures took place at the, rooms of 31 51; Christie and Manson. The first picture selected for theo tional Gallery was "Lot and his Daughters leaving S I)(1 ,, 111/ by Guido, for which the sum of 1,600 guineas was pai u 'i companion picture, "Susannah and the Elders," fetchei,3l6 guineas. An " Interior," by Ostade, was bought for_der, guineas. The "Wonsan taken in Adultery," generallyr"..iftfoo stood to be by Titian, but which Mr. Christie candidly 'lll was doubtedby some connoisseurs, realised 600 0 11° 1' vieli other splendid picture bought on account of the Gov 4,0 was the "Judgment of Paris," by Rubella; for this guineas was paid —Evening Paper. s ,' 0. 1 ; J ; REVOLVING DIOPTRIC • LANTERN FOR T.- vi - Dc MUDA CAST-IRON LIGIITDOUSE.—The above lantern log , constructed under the-,direction of the Honourabl e ot itlk, House Company, and will shortly be shipped for 8e r .„ ( 1 1 ,.' The lantern forming the light room is 10 feet high irbir j feet in diameter, suppo,..ted, by iron pedestals .of 7 fe e . L r f, and is a polygon of 16 sides; to which an iron P e ' A . osti,; platform is fixed, with ant ornamental scroll at one en," h co), flight of steps at the other.. The lantern is glazed W"ppr thick plate glass and the roof is formed of strong co v a lobr a plates, supported by iron rafters. On the top a /arg e •'a t` r head and vane is mounted, for the purpose olventilanstingo lantern. In the centre is fixed an iron column suPP, t °r dioptric apparatus of the first order, consisting of eig ll v a gonal lenses of grea t power , mounted upon a frame 3 e tab paratus revolving by means of machinery. Around tb tie ts° ,, or platform is a large iron fra me, which supports four wie,„ mirrors at bottom, and eight tiers above the polygonn!:e' fixed at correct angles for exhibiting the light, whic lll- .5t 0 . ; by a powerful lamp fixed in the centre of the 1 1 1 3 P . r - ctil r ,, which consists of a concentrateo burner with four piP, wicks. There are altogether 38'- mirrors of s ilver glass. The whole is mounted with an improved ven.t i o ' t etg,' apparatus upon Professor Faraday's principle. The ' r i ot!! pedestal, apparatus, and machinery form a most inr e o isic work of art, and does great credit to the skill and find 0 / a the manufacturers. . 10 - HORRIBLE DEATIL—ENSHAM, OXON, J l / 1 ' g. We had a dreadful occurrence in the village last wletioVj wild young fellow slightly stabbed two men in a " e l $ 1) quarrel, for which be was put in the cage; he beg i goi4 9 entreated he might not be locked up alone, and offered , tbe , o to any one who would sit up with him; but in vai n 70 01 , e locked him in, and had not leftirim long when 60' , t sD' t the cage was on fire. It was some time before the coo? who bad the key could be found, and when the door, tli s o last opened the flames rushed forth to such a deglbe e ,A they could not get the poor wretch out till water ' , ti t thrown in to extinguish them. The man was then 0 7,, out quite insensible, though not dead, and dreadfully se ° , lr Dr. Hitching, from Oxford, arrived just in tijne to sv" expire. . es tef a le BRISTOL ; JULY B.—The Bristol and Gr l ° - ro line of railway (37i. miles in length) was opened t-1 0 : 0 'j out this morning, and the event was marked with t be o $ ll demonstrations of rejoicing. On Saturday the direct? t riii ° ;, their friends made an excursion on the line in a speci„ 3 4 By the opening of this line the inconvenience which 0 "' ( 10 1 hitherto experienced from the disseverance of th e 31 1( 1 of !railway between the west. and the north of EIJI° A )bviated. GRAV 1 attndayi 4 4 green, Ilalf-; -0 ore Cat Star offi ce G THE G] OMPA C ' lll Ps are appc ,21,AAIBURGI trery Wedne I T-ORE—E 4 -NTWERP— T 14 7, at Eleven, : 0 I A T R E s N t o D u — T T n i v.,OITLOGNE °es. 5 3. an,. 4 h e ALIS—E, it ' and 4s. ' TI LL —Eve/ tkVISGA:r F., 4114 1) .. M8URG1 "err te %tag. al —TS Fr, ~ItEWCASTL: 81i14TVER8R 1 LN A: T h been RR day, and :]VERand secure O r tUre, fares, tIp FT tit; C( er e TERRA g a New ' l aving nes 15,000/ freehold estat" °Trnal Un th e ; 4quested to see attcatiNtirnestetr,eBLtoi] ATONEI mone u f r g, 184: 1 cuu distrib 35,0 0 4111 e, S tott n lO w Ticket uad ( 0 „ • and Re nul' e v o rder to tl Ofn eeninent 1 ce hotus f rot •Aborri bro egt The p ei t deserve b' elo `eanandatlon. 1) 0 , 4 . Havin l r eeri ged . floor, rt Itsd 4t iona is 1 w , dr_ nrprising t ug-room 11 e ijiiP i PlY to 13E: GILT Gold or Or Molu ,„, Bronze ktc""e compo rtsoluslahlg, and tro ol kre(l to the tto titi i e n e ftY re This Ipy trc l Mitatl li tlpWisll:44et' i e n°l : ti d t sr i e ll ; , r: S e lf: ; :v sA t ,1 AV I '4l I. e l ldr „ Rife coantp It:c; i tp t0,, 1 , 1 ' 3 ` debts' t n 'aking a 'oti, l3ll, 4tit of Beard th to the pL~be a Pape .* t4ll" 7 s rria Attorrieortllhrl Ine4L:dtire6lll%'-----3--. fakr,teee°eellii:t.f.4::t4:4ll:lnt:l::ti'l Wit iie ' I % ! Alt ttoll:t - ' Xtp r T Xh4, , ,ra4 ;41Petitiones1 ‘kr tA an a in 1 tile _ the date he i4 : r n o s t :7' ALL wl . 814,,...„C0FFE hol e and I New Di Aer p W hlch (la. R; e qnsTD. ' Pozir Te a of .1) - & - i. To the Inhabit , and I No. I' s '. 2d. "La 8 . 6d, N . Co 3 ,4 a, " Od. N o our. • 41 33 . 6d, • I. 7, 1404.4: od. In : 63 .0 d rtOp e d 11 0, 3' 5i 04, We a '• 6 1 4ort Y to aL a. t 7 a Y 6 op, arld head ta s ri g e ' s v : the titik 9 1 • Mg obciated. • .........,................ <l , A SIX POUNDS of TEA, and upwards, sent, carriage ill ; e 1 f er part-of the Kingdom, at the Wholesale Price, on receipt 0,- tance, or_Post-office order. 50. Black, 2s. Bd., 38., 3s. 4d., 3s. Bd., 45., 4s. 4d., 4s. Bd., Green, 3s. 4d., 3s. Bd.. 45., 4s. 4 d., 55., ss. 4d. 6s. 7 s; 26. p Coffee, 9d„ Is. Is. 2d., 18.4 d., Is., 6d., Is. Gd., Is. ' 1 0 .,' 09 G. T. MANSELL' and CO., Wholesale Tea Dealers, "A*,„ec LERSBURY, CIIEAPSIDE. Agencies will be given , t: ..... -:::, parties ,IIIIIIMII!MIINMI. BIRTHS. f ferd• On the 27th ult., at Darlington, Mrs. W. O'Brien , °P al P" On the Ist inst., at Leckhampst ea d Rectory, Bum' 11 Heneage Drummond, of a son. _ .16 ,..„, 0 ,1 11 - On the Ist inst., the wif e o f J o h n T ur ner, 81 0 " -- - t ile Wycombe, Bucks, of a son. Oct On the 3d inst., at St. A n d rew ' s -pl ace , R e gent'S-P ° 0 ( lady Maude, Esq., of a son. O h On the sth inst., at Toft Hall, Cheshire, Mrs. LeY e .fp a son and heir. :fR of Y On the sth inst., in the Wandsworth-road, the NN"' - If. Andrew Surgeon, of a daughter. A..,, of 0. On the 6th inst., in Hyde-park-street, the la- , Skelton, Esq., Madras Civil Service, of a daughter. P i' , MARRIED. A F. 10 On the 3d inst., at Bovington Church, Herts, ,-;„ J . , 1 5. ward, Esq., 8.A., of St. Edmund Hall, Oxford,„'". DI• youngest daughter of the late Thomas Morton, -r''''' C.S., of her Majesty's service. rd /W e 'On the 27th ult., at St. Pancras Church, Rich* „ J O -0 Esq., of Crediton, Devon, to, Miss Jones, of Graft ° ' o f FiOn tzro th y -square. (1 0 i e 3d inst., at Alton', William Thomas, seco ° Esc ° the late Captain Clement, R.N., to Mary M ile ' It' ' daughter ofJames White Clement, Esq. ia jot On the 6th inst., at St. John's, Paddington, Cart", e i e , D e land, Royal Artillery, to Clara Marv, only daughter •`, 0 ' Edward Dance, Esq., Deputy COmmissary-Genera Forces. lat e i' DIED. On the 23d ult., at Ormskirk, Ann, the relict of t he 01l Bridges, Esq., of South L am b e th. On the 27th ult., at Plymouth, James Freeth, :Esq.' 13 Olt a Lieutenant-Colonel in her Majesty's 64th Foot.- „., 1 On the 29th ult., at Hermes House, Pentonvil le, relict of the late Mani Alderson, Esq., solicitor. ilt -stl i ,, On the Ist inst ~ in Cambridge-street, Conna°g-orO P Mary, the widow of the late tel H. Crowe , of -i' jo io Norfolk, aged 95. c bet, pat , 0 On the 4th inst., at the Rectory House, , ifi d°'' .nf Richards, Esq., aged 82. On the 4th inst., at Benfield, Mrs. Mary Riv e ,r - 0 '00 11 ,,,;‘' the late Francis Rivers, Esq., of Spring-gardens, l' ehe 13' On the sth inst., at Kilburn, Hannah, relict of ' . 0 , b , Chafer, Esq., of St. Dunstan'shill, aged ' 85. a ged f On the sth inst., at Putney, George Ogg, ES C I"...---...,,, - -G, 0. -----_,__----,,V), jjr: London: Printed and Published by MURDO v/40%., 0 1 No. 112, Strand, Printer, at The Sun Ott e 101.411 • v ' StratA in t Pr,eß.4nct of the Savo'', tlid. 7, Oz; Theta Midi 9, 1844. , '