The Sun. — London, England, 1836-11-17 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. The attempt to effect a co unter-revolution in Lisbon, it will be observed, has f a iled—signally failed—and we confess we rejoice at it. Tile establishment of the Constitution of 1820 may have been the unconstitu tional act of a military p o wer, and therefore not to he supported or defended ; but any attempt to unsettle, that Constitution by the same means is only to give a sanction to a precedent bad in principle, and most dangeroos in its a pplication. The p e ople of Portugal are in danger of being made too familiar with changes in their political condition effected through purely military means, to feel much respect for those improve ments that may be introduced by the legitimate ma chinery of constitutional government. The supporters of the Constitution of 1826 ought to have allowed the question of its modification to go before the Cortes, the only power whose authority should be recognised as capable of giving a lawful sanction to any change in the form of Government. Sup pose even that the ill advised proceeding of the 3d and 4th had succeeded, must it not have been obvious that, effected by such a means, the change would have still left a deep f e eling of dissatisfaction in the minds of the defeated party ? We have that confidence in the go od sense and patriotism of time great body of the Portuoriese people that we are convinced the repre seiatatives o f their opinions will not be the abettors of the anarchical proceedings aimed at by many of those who clamoured loudest for the Constitution of 1820. A n d, therefore, we think it was the duty of those who took upon themselves the task of advising her Majesty to have waited the assembling of the Cortes, and there • nosed whatever plan might have s eemed best ada p ted po i to promote the re. al interests of the country. A g ain we . say that we are glad o:c this defeat to establish a form of Government, no matter how desirable, by means of which no friend of constituti6:aal liberty can approve. We observe that insinuations i lather than direct charges are levelled against the Engfis,l'. Gov to ernment term for what some clear-sighted writers are please.,.l " intervention" in favour of a counter-revolution. In tervention indeed i Why, has not the attempt at a counter-revolution been defeated ; and who will ven ture to say that it would have been so, had the Bri tish Government chosen to support it by a single broadside from a single ship ? England has interfered to her own honour, and to time honour of human na ture. Refusing to take any part whatever in the poli tical movement, the representative of the British Go vernment employed the means at his disposal, and em ployed them effectually, to protect the Queen and the Court from the violence of the excited soldiery. Were it not for the presence of the marines and the fleet, we agree with our Correspondent that there is reason to apprehend that the most deplorable consequences must . have resulted. And this is the interference that is condemned—condemned, too, by those who are bold enough to charge the British Government with a reck less indifference to human life I—Morning Chronicle. We revert to the affairs of the Church, of which we trust that the sequel of these remarks, however the opening of them may give offence to this or that per son, will prove that we are the most staunch and true friends. With respect to the patronage of all the new 'churches to be constructed at the cost of liberal indi viduals in and near London, the Bishop of the diocese must not, we tell him frankly, think for a moment of appropriating so vast a property as the patronage of them to himself and his see ; he must cast the idea from him in an instant, if he ever harboured it, as the "accursed thing," or he will create a confusion in this metropolis, of which no one can forsee the issue. The episcopal jurisdiction over them which belongs to his Lordship of right, as their diocesan, is quite enough, with the due administration of the rest of the see, for any single human powers. We have ourselves heard of no better proposition than that which we suggested —that they should be divided between the Universities of the realm ; and if the King's College were admitted as a partner, so that it might have the means of re warding its meritorious masters (as is the case with Chrit's Hospital), we should see no objection. The letter of " Verax," though coming from a respectable quarter, does not at all affect our general argument or our opinion. The affair spoken of by the Glocester shire curate, in our paper of Monday, is one to which we refer with peculiar pain. Build the Bishop of that diocese a palace out of the funds appropriated to the purpose of supplying the poor houseless clergy of small and deserted parishes with houses 011! shame, where is thy blush ! We trust this will never be heard of again. The holding a stall at West minster in commendam with the bishopric is bad enough ; but there are other lawn sleeves sullied with that practice as well as those of the person in ques tion. Once for all, we must most earnestly entreat the dignitaries of the Church to do nothing that can in anywise, at this most trying moment, render the defence of them and their order more difficult to their friends and those of the establishment. Having said this much, we must face about and endeavour to repel, as we will with all our force, an unjust aggression on the Church; and this is the more necessary, as it comes under the powerful form of an act of Parliament—the Act, that of the 6th and 7th of William IV., entitled " For the Commutation of " Tithes in England and 'Wales." We have some thoughts of reviewing the charge recently published by the Bishop of Exeter, with ,some parts of which, judging only from the summary of its contents, we do not agree. But it surprises us much that the mis chievous character of clause 29 in the above act should have escaped his Lordship's attention, and that of the more intelligent branch of the Legislature. That clause provides that no greater quantity of land than twenty acres shall be given as a commutation for tithes ! Why ? we ask. Why may not a clergyman barter an interest of one kind which he has on the land of his parish for an interest of another kind— for an equivalent portion of the land itself ? We know that some nonsense will be talked about the Statute of Mortmain. This question has nothing to do with the Statute of Mortmain. Here is no purchase or be quest in the case. The incumbent has as great an hold of the land now as he ever will have. He does not increase the possessions of the Church, for value of land (in its modus) is given for land : he simply changes time name of his property. Now, there aie some deeds of wrong which we have felt it our duty to reprehend on the part of the Radicals ; but the insertion of this clause it no crime of theirs—it is a pure Whig job. The aristocracy of that proud and rapacious faction do not wish to have any landlords but themselves. They do not wish the oppressed far mer under their holding to have any indulgent land lord to point to in the person of a neighbouring clergy man ; for we doubt not that the clergy will, up to the extent of their means, be, as they have ever been, most kind and considerate in their dealings with their pa rishioners. Besides, we had understood that the great ob ject of the Tithe Commutation Bill was to prevent paro chial quarrels. Now do what we can under this new act, when it shall be in complete operation, you will have a due portion of conflicting interests, and of course of rural disagreements, on the subject of your rent-charges, though perhaps not so many as limier the tithing sys tem ; and the haven of escape to which the country looked from that second source of dissatisfaction was a more facile commutation of the rent-charge for land. Why, then, prevent that commutation in the first in stance ? Why, indeed, but for the anti-social and in solent reason mentioned above—that time Whig land lords wish to have no competitors iu the possession of time terra firma of the country ? m i t we can tell them, that the more they isolate themselves, the more insecure they render their position—" defealit nume rus."—Times. The two unhappy Queens, who arc under time pro tection of Lord Palmerston and his quadruple al liance, seem to have anything but a pleasant life of it, in playing the part of Royalty upon Constitutional hrones, surrounded by Constitutional soldiers, and re minded every now and then that they are but Vices Queens to his supreme Majesty—the most Constitu tional people ! Into Spain more than 20,000 foreign bayonets were sent, by virtue of the quadruple al liance, to support the Estatuto Real, which was pompously proclaimed as the emanation of liberal wis dom, and of all plans of Government the most in ac cordance with the national wants and the national will. A military mob in one night demolished the .Estatuto Real, and time whole fabric of Government built upon it. Along with that the great work of THE SUN, LONDON, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1836. our Foreign Secretary, next to the immortal proto cols, was brushed away like a spider's svcb, though the diplomatic artist . by which it was spun Mill amuses himself by endeavouring to repair the irrepar,7 - bly-shattered filaments. " Destroy his diplomatic web, in vain, The creature's at his flimsy work again." Almost simultaneous with the demolition of the Royal statute of Spain was the cancelling and trampling under foot of the Constitutional Charter of D on Pedro by the military " Constitutionalists" of Lisbon, at the point of the bayonet. The very Cons titution which was the great prize struggled for by the Portuguese Liberals, in a furious and bloody war—the Constitu tion to gain which for those Portuguese Liberals, British valour was prodigally displayed,_British treasure expended, and Whig co-operation justified—that very Constitution survived its author not so long as the war to obtain it lasted, and is now buried in his tomb ! Another act in the tragi-comedy of Vs non-in tervention has just now been performed at Lisbon, for the details of which we refer to the Correspondence in our columns to-day. That act has been attended with some bloodshed. A distinguished victim has been sacrificed on the altar of revolutionary liberty— Agostino Jose Freire, one of the few Portuguese Statesmen who was not an enemy of English interests, has paid the forfeit of his life to consolidate the system of what is called the " Constitution of 1822." One of the prominent circumstances of the movement was, the loud and vehement expression of popular hatred to the English name and nation—and certainly it is the fitting reward for people who obtrusively intermeddle in the affairs of their neighbours. Will nothing cure the Whig Government and our liberal countrymen of this besetting sin ? The British troops, who have been fighting the battles of the Spanish Liberals, are de frauded of their pay, and left to starve or rob at St. Sebastian, and the whole English nation is execrated by the liberal Portuguese, because British troops pre served Oporto, and prevented the incapable Don Pedro and his " brave cazadorcs" from being driven into the sea ; and because gallant British tars, com manded by the hold Napier, gave the final blow to the powe r of Don Miguel, and enthroned the " , Consti tutional Q, een at Lisbon. It would appear that the Portuguese be:tc'e that the English, who, under their non-intervention Ministry, have got the cha• ratter of intermeddling in every thing, were the instigators of the attempt, or apprehended attempt, at a counter-revolution, which has ended so disas trously for the unhappy young Queen—obliged, as she was, to send successive flags of truce to her own sub jects, and, finally, to capitulate to the National Guards in the capital of her dominions ! Some of the Por tuguese journals, not long since, pointed at the repre sentative of Belgium, as being engaged in intrigues to bring about a counter-revolution. We commented upon the subject at the time, and expressed a hope that the English would keep clear of such intrigues, if they really existed. Whether Belgic influence had in reality anything to do with the origin of the com motion, does not yet clearly appear—but, if it had we presume the consequences will be unpleasant to the scion of the family of Cobourg, that has been transplanted to the soil of Portugal. Some time ago, flourishing accounts were sent home from Lisbon of the aspect of decision which the British Government assumed. We were told that the British vessels of war were so placed as to be prepared to batter Lisbon in case of necessity ; and that the Ta/avera had her guns pointed against the Custom house. Moreover, that the marines were drilled several times a day, with the view of striking awe into the hearts of the mutinous Portuguese. These " awful appearances" were like Lord Palmerston's naval " de monstrations" elsewhere, and so we described them to be at the time. Have we been deceived in supposing that such demonstrations would only excite in the event the ridicule of foreigners, and illustrate the Whig policy of " willing to wound, but yet afraid to strike." On the present occasion it appears that the British marines were actually landed, and took up a position, with the evident intention of overawing the rebellious subjects of the Queen ; but the National Guards having_ refused to treat with the Queen while they re mained on shore, they were re-embarked. It was not so the British lion used to show his teeth, and then turn his tail to the enemy I So, until the next catas trophe, terminated " This strange—eventful history." —Morning Herald. The death of the exiled French Monarch Charles X., which we announced in yesterday's publication is confirmed. That illustrious son of misfortune is no more. He has found at last a resting place in the grave, and the hand of friendship already hastens to strew over his tomb the sweet flowers of those recol lections which his long and varied life supplies. A more amiable, honourable, and benevolent monarch never existed. Though fate selected him as a victim of her several trials—though thrice an exile from the palace of his ancestry, and the sport of circumstances, which are more powerful than human will—he pre served the respect and esteem of those who were about him to the last, and exhibited a moral dignity in his misfortunes which well became the high lineage from which lie had descended. A few attached subjects rendered him the homage of their loyalty and their love, though the world had abandoned him, and his own kindred had conspired to blot his name out of the list of European Sovereigns. There still remained some honourable men whose loyalty was above price, whose affection was increased by his misfortunes, and he was perhaps more proud, and more happy in their support, than when millions bowed down before his throne, and sycophants sought honours and distinctions at his hand. The Count d'Artois, as Charles the Tenth was called dur ing the life of his two elder brothers, quitted France previous to the last terrors of the revolution, and took a distinguished part in the military operations which were undertaken with Prussian aid on the northern frontier. He then removed to the shores of Great Bri tain—the hospitable refuge of all men like him, whose virtues are illustrated by their misfortunes. He occu pied the Palace of Holyrood for some time, and then resided in South Andley-street, Grosvenor-square, for several years, happy in the society of one for whom he had made great sacrifices, and whose attachment was of that romantic nature which scarcely belongs to this age of hard reality. Previous to the revolution, as one of the handsomest men of his day, he dipped deeply into all the pleasures and excitement of that gallant time, and lived with so much profusion that he contracted debts, for which afterwards he was perse cuted in this country. Among the many curious adventures in which he was engaged, his duel with the Duke de Bourbon—whose mysterious death a few years since must still be fresh in our rea ders' recollection—was not the least remarkable. The Count d'Artois was present at one of those magnificent masqued balls which were then given at the Opera-house, with the beautiful Madame de Canillae under his protection. Their attention was drawn to the splendid costume of another mask, whom they suseected to be the Duchess of Bourbon, then living separated from the Duke. Madame de Canillac went beyond the bounds of etiquette in trying to gra tify her curiosity ; and the Count d'Artois, it was said, so far forgot himself as to aid it by attempting to re move the mask from the face of this distinguished per sonage. The consequence of this freedom was that the Duke of Bourbon felt himself obliged to take the matter up. A challenge was given and received—and the two Princes of the Blood met in the Bois de Bou logne with their respective seconds. The Duke de Bourbo n was one of the best swordsmen in France, and he received with perfect composure the violent as sault of the Count &Artois, contenting himself with parrying his thrusts, and not taking advantage of his own powe r , or of the unskilfulness of his oppo nent. The Count was not aware of the noble con duct of his opponent, but the seconds, being mili tary men, soon perceived it, and those in time suite of the Count d'Artois advanced between the comba tants, and called on their principal to remark that the Duke de Bourbon had not taken ad vantage of the opportunitie s which circumstances , on h ear i ng this, threw had afforded. T he Count c , away his sword, an d, rushin g i nto the arms of the Duke, offered him every atonement that he could re quire, and asked again t o be restored t o his friendship. The Duke warmly embraced the Count, and th e y re turned to Paris in the same carriage. Such were the French gyntlelnen of that day ! The Count d'Artois married, before the Revolution, a daughter of the House of Savoy, but, having had the misfortune to lose her, be formed an attachment with Madame de Pollastron, the sister of the Prince de Polignac, whose m i„r e situnes are at present occupying the attention of the pub:!", His affection for this lady was so sin cere, that whsti she died, during his residence in South Andley-street, he became a prey to the liveliest grief, and a remarkable change came over his mind and character. Previous to that peri o d he had been distinguished for acts of gallantry, and habits of life which will not bear strict criticism ; but from the hour of Madame de Pollastron's death he became thoughtful and reserved, and sought in the religion of his forefathers a consolation for the blow which his affections had received, The Count d'Artois was always generous, spirited, and amiable; but now a fresh motive excited his good nature, and the acts of his charity became unbounded. His bene volence was as silent as it was sincere, and many a widow's and orphan's heart have beep made glad, with out knowing the source of the bounty to which they were indebted, While thus fulfilling the duty which his devotion prescribed, and whip); his owl feelings dictated, he did not neglect the claims which the gen tlemen of France who abandoned their country with him had ripen his family. He was the friend and the associate of all the distinguished emigrants—the warmth of his manner gaining every heart, the more so as it was contrasted with the colder and more calculating spirit of his elder brother. To be a Frenchman and an exile, was a passport to his friend ship. He was one of the first of the Royal Family who returned to France on the restoration. He appeared at Vessoul, in Fra'nehe cornt, in 1811, and soon after wards passed on to Paris, where he acted as Lieute tenant- General of the kingdom, to which he had been instantly appointed by Louis XVIII. It was chiefly through his exertions that the claims of the emigrants were taken into consideration ; and the indemnity which was voted for their use, and part only of which they received, in consequence of the legislative plunder of M. Lafitte, in 1831, was mainly attributable to his exertions. A love of justice was the foundation of his character—and compensation to those who sacrificed everything for his family was in his mind a sacred duty. He ascended the throne on the death of his brother, Louis XVIII. The revolution of 1830 is fresh in our readers' recollection, and we need not go over the cir cumstances of that unhappy period. The events which have since occurred have rendered justice to the motives of Charles X., and of the Ministers who have, up to this time, been made the victims of a policy vindictive as it is unjust. The spirit of republicanism which has so often attempted to overthrow the Monarchy that suc ceeded his was no bugbear of the imagination. Un fortunately for his family, the measures he adopted were unequal to the end. He was the victim' of a conspi racy which had been long organised. England again received the illustrious exile, and Holyrood once more sheltered him from the political storms of the revolu tion. Let those who wish to write the private history of Charles X. go to Holyrood for materials. The re spect and affection of the people in that neighbour hood for him and the illustrious companions of his exile are the best evidences of his virtues. Since Charles the Tenth thought fit to change his residence from Great Britain to the Austrian States, he lived in the vicinity of Prague, occasionally visiting the cele brated baths of Tceplitz, or occupying in the summer a chateau near the former city. He there devoted all his thoughts to the education of the illustrious Prince who is the heir to the virtues, but we hope not to the misfor tunes of his family. Watching over the young scion of a dynasty of eight centuries, the exiled monarch has spent his time in patience and resignation, forgetful of the past, forgiving the many wrongs which he sustained from an ungrateful people, and filling the mind of his tender charge with the purest love for France, and with an awful sense of the high duties which the same fate which deprived him of a Throne may call upon him one day to exercise. Within a few months he deter mined to remove from Prague, and establish the ruins of his fortune and household at Goritz, in Illyria ; but scarcely had he made the change than the hand of death came to summon him to that place where the Monarch and the subject are equal, and where all the cares of his former state, and latter wrongs, are hushed in eternal sleep. He died in the midst of the members of his afflicted family, whose constancy and truth long compensated him for the injustice of the world.— Morning Post. There never was a more erroneous notion than that entertained, and still persisted in, by Mr. O'Connell that the majority of the people of England are indif ferent on the subject of Ireland's claims to justice. That it is altogether unfounded we have repeatedly, on former occasions, proved by the unanswerable logic of facts. Thoroughly erroneous, however, though the Hon. and Learned Gentleman's impression is, we are not sure that the circumstance of his entertaining it ought to be considered a matter of regret. It is true that to hold such an opinion is to do an injustice to the Re formers of this country ; but then its inevitable ten dencies, as regards Ireland herself, are of a most salu tary nature. Were Mr. O'Connell and the people of Ireland—for, perhaps, a large majority of Irishmen to adopt his opinions in such matters without examining into their truth for themselves—were, we say, the Hon. and Learned Gentleman and the people of Ireland of a different opinion, there would have been some danger of their trusting too much to the exertions on their behalf of the Reformers on this side of the water, and their not being sufficiently active and energetic them selves. As it is, they act as if their triumph over their Tory foes can only be achieved by their own efforts. Hence they arc labouring to work out their freedom with an earnestness, a perseverance, and a vigour, which are, perhaps, unparalleled in history. Irishmen are now united as one man. In the great struggle which is going on all the distinctions of sects and shades of opinion are laid aside. 'Whoever is for free dom—whoever loves his country—ranges himself, as a matter of course on the side of the people : he iden tifies himself with the liberal party, though he may differ from the leading men of that party on matters of minor importance. And as his peculiar modifica tions of opinion do not prevent his joining the ranks of the friends of Ireland, so neither do those modifications prevent his being received by his country's tried friends with open arms. There is not, at this moment, a third or neutral party in Ireland. Hitherto there always has been so, which has been one of the greatest obtacles interposed to that coun try's freedom. Now all are either decidedly for or against their country. The latter class have dwindled down to a mere handful. The faction is now limited to two or three hundred thousand hot-headed Orange men. What are these to seven millions and a half, all resolutely determined on asserting their rights as men and as subjects of the British crown? Ireland presents at this present time one of the most glorious moral spectacles ever exhibited under heaven. Her people are bound together by the most sacred ties, the love of country and the love of freedom. They are animated by one spirit ; they arc bent on the accom plishment of one object—their country's release from despotic fa c ti on ; an d th e y are resolved 11c graspshallleyo never verlose sight of that object, not even for an instant, until it has been gained. And the weapons, too, with which they are to wage the war in which they have engaged, a o g f e d, the are war itself. ap accordance with the sa credness There is to be no over stepping the limits set by the Constitution—no re course to physical force—no violence of any kind—all is to be c onstitutional and peaceable. Strong in the justice of their c ause—resistless in their numbers, their union, and the spirit which animates them, the people of Ireland need no other aids. They have only to battle it a little longer, and the triumph is theirs. But let the people of England notwithstanding lend them a helping hand. It is in our power, however, to acce lerate their triumph ; and this we are sure our country men will be generous enough to do, notwithstanding Mr. O'C o nnell's groundless impression that we are in different to the fate of Ireland.—Morning . Advertiser. The West Devon Standard, Tory journal, pub lished in this town after a two years' struggle for existence, has been discontinued.—Devonport Telegraph. A CRACK HAND.—On Friday last, as Street, the coachman of the Red Rover coach, was on his journey to wards Dorset, a snipe got up by the road-side, when Street with the precision of a true sportsman, brought the bird down with the point of his whip.--Dorset Chronicle. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Nor. 16. WHATFORD V. MOORE. This was an appeal from the Vice-Chancellor. The question turned on the construction of a marriage settle ment executed in 1763 and 1788, by which a sum of 4,0001. and 2,0001. were respectively secured on an estate in De vonshire for the benefit of younger children, payable to sons when they attained the age of twenty-one, or to daugh ters when they attained the age of eighteen or married. The plaintiff was the representative of the eldest of three daughters, and claimed one-third of the sum so settled ; but in consequence of certain expressions in the settlement, which seemed to render it necessary that the children should survive their parents to become entitled to the sums se cured, and it appearing that Elizabeth, under whom the plaintiff claimed, did not survive her parents, the Vice- Chancellor decided that the plaintiff was not entitled. Mr. TINNEY now appeared in support of an appeal against this decision. The arguments were not concluded at the rising of the Court, ROLLS COURT.—Nov. 16. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. LUBBOCK. His Lordship the MASTER of the ROLLS proceeded to deliver his judgment. The principal question for the deci sion of the Court was as to the proposed increase of the stipends to the pensioners, and whether five additional pen sioners, with stipends of 50/. per annum, should be added to the number at present in the college. His Lordship referred to the pro Visions of the will, and, after comment ing upon the facts of the ease, said that there had been two schemes proposed before the Master—one on the part of the relators, and the other on the part of the trus tees, The relators proposed that an increase of 32/. per annum should be made to the 40/. per annum at present received by the pensioners, making in the whole 72/. per annum. By this Arrangement the sum of 410/. would be left as q surplus to meet the necessary expenses of re pairing the college, The trustees, by their scheme, pro posed that five additional pensioners should be admitted into the college, and that their stipends should be fixed at 60/. per annum, thereby leaving a surplus of 5781. Corn paring these two estimates, his Lordship was of opinion that the sum of 4101. was by no means too little to lay by for repairs, and for the other purposes of that nature. The only question that now remained was to inquire whe ther the allowance of 72/. a year was too great, or whether the allowance of 601. a year was too small, for the pen sioners. He was of opinion that the scheme of the rela tors, fixing the stipends at 721. per annum, should be adopted. The decree he should make would be to refer the matter back to the Master to review his report, sub ject to the declaration of the Court, that there should be an increase of 321. per annum to the stipends of the pen sioners—that the number of pensioners should be continued at 39, the present number—and that the chaplain and trea surer were not entitled to extra rooms. The Master was also to consider the best mode of applying the garden ground. The costs to be taxed up to the hearing as be tween solicitor and client, and to be paid out of the funds of the institution. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Nor. 16. EVANS V. JACKSON. This cause, which was part heard yesterday, was con cluded this morning. It was a suit for specific performance by the executors of a lessor against a person who had con tracted with them to take an underlease. The whole ques tion was, whether they would give a title which the de fendant was bound to accept. Thomas Oldham, the tes tator, late of Bucklersbury, bequeathed a leasehold house and garden which he occupied at Brixton to the plaintiffs, his executors, upon trust to sell, and out of the proceeds of that and the rest of his personal estate to pay his debts and legacies. Shortly after the testator's death, in 1832, the executors put up the property for sale, but were unable to find a purchaser. The defendant then offered to take the premises on lease, and at length, in August, 1833, a con tract for a lease of the house and fixtures was agreed to, by which the plaintiffs undertook to execute a good and suf ficient lease. The defendant was put in possession. Some disputes arose as to fixtures. The lease was, however, at length engrossed for execution, when the defendant's soli citor insisted on seeing the will. The trust for sale was there discovered, and the defendant at that stage, refused to accept the lease, on the ground that the plaintiffs were not authorized under the terms of the will to grant a lease. Their sole authority was to sell, and by accepting probate they were bound to act in conformity with the trusts. Mr. KNIGHT was for the plaintiff ; Mr. JACOB for the defendant. The VICE-CHANCELLOR could not say this was a title the defendant was bound to accept ; but as it appeared both parties had missed the point of objection in the course of their negotiation in dismissing the bill, the Court would not give costs. BAIL COURT. NUTTING V. SIMMONS. Mr. liumpinvcys applied for a rule calling on the de fendant to show cause why the record for going to trial should not be replaced, and the defendant pay the expenses attending such proceedings. The plaintiff was an attorney, and at the last sittings after Term had brought an action for slander, which came on for trial at Guildhall before Lord Denman. After the examination of the first witness the plaintiff said if the defendant would make an apology, he would withdraw the record. Mr. Kelly, who con ducted the defendant's case, acceded to the proposal, and the record was withdrawn, Lord Denman remarking on the very handsome conduct of the plaintiff. On the following day a report appeared in the papers of the trial, which, being seen by the defendant, letters were sent to the papers stating that the account was false, for he had never made an apology, nor did he intend to do it. The plaintiff on seeing this had waited on the editors of the papers in ques tion, and had seen MSS., which appeared to be in the hand-writing of the defendant, the same description and style having been sent from the defendant to the plaintiff in the course of the proceedings. As he had denied making an apology, and the plaintiff having withdrawn the record under the impression he had done so, he now sought to have the record replaced, so that he could go to trial. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE observed it was a novel point. He should therefore grant the rule. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Nor. 13. (Concluded from The Sun of yesterday.) THE BANK OF ENGLAND V. ANDERSON AND OTHERS. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, on behalf of the defendants, argued that his clients had been guilty of no infringement of the legal privileges of the plaintiffs ; and that the Court would pause long before they would put such a construc tion on the law. The private banks of London were banks of deposit, and not of issue ; but they acted as agents for country banks which were banks of issue ; now it would be of the greatest importance to them if the con struction of the law sought for by the plaintiffs were to prevail, because it would have the necessary effect of driv ing all those formidable rivals out of the market, as it would most materially cripple their operations as banks of deposit. If, indeed, the Westminster Bank were to issue notes for circulation, then they would be a bank of issue ; but then they did no such thing ; they only promised to pay a sum of money in their hands according to the order of the owner at whose disposal they held it. He con tended that an Act of Parliament conferring a monopoly on any particular set of persons must always be construed most strictly, as being an encroachment on the rights and privileges of the public at large. If they, in what the de fendants had done, had committed a violation of the Bank Act, they were liable to be indicted for it ; and lie sub mitted, that in construing that Act, they Court would do so as strictly as if this really were an indictment against the defendants. His Learned Friend had endeavoured to give to the words of the Act an effect beyond that which it would bear. If it was intended to include bills payable on demand, why not insert these words," payable on demand ?" These words not being inserted, proved that it was not the intention of the Legislature to include them. The expres sion of the one is the exclusion of the other ; and there is a very good reason why those words were excluded ; be cause, if they had been inserted, the whole of London, the whole mercantile world, would have been up in arms against them. It was a mistake to suppose that, because an Act of Parliament did not give Parliamentary encouragement or privileges to banks consisting of more than six persons, that therefore it did not permit their existence according to their common law rights. It was very true that in consideration of a bargain made with the Bank of England, it conferred certain privileges on them which they did not possess before ; but it did not therefore take awry from others those rights which the common law gave them. The Learned Counsel then referred to the form of instruments in use at the time of the passing of the Act of Anne. Before then they consisted either of bills unsealed, or bills sealed, both of which were alike unnegotiable, but the sealed bill was held the better security. In fact, India bonds of the present day are in form neither more nor less than the ancient sealed bill. The words of the Act of Anne therefore do not apply to the modern instrument of a bill of exchange. If the Court were to give to them the effect sought for on the other side, they would hold that any person accepting a bill of exchange for an antecedent debt, would be guilty of an offence. It was wholly imma terial whether the defendants carried on the business of banking or not ; for in the case of " Broughton v. The Man chester Water Works," it was clear that the defendants did not carry on the business of banking, so that it would be impossible fgr a mercantile qr reining company to accept a bill for an existing debt, There was no East India or West India House in the city of London that was not to • some extent a banking-house. They had money in their hands to make payments on account of their foreign correspondents ; they received their !T ividend s un d er warrants of attorney ; they kept regular eau accounts with them ; and accepted bills of exchange drawn upon them at 21 days' sight ; therefore, although they were not called hankers, they were bankers to all intents and purposes. The Learned Gentleman proceeded to press the inconve nience that must result to the mercantile world from the construction of the case which was contended for by the plaintiffs ; and also to argue that the act of Anne did not refer to a modern negotiable bill of, exchange. In illus tration of the latter proposition, he proposed to call the attention of the Court to a sealed bill of the date of the reign of Queen Anne, which he had obtained from the Bodleian library, when Mr. MAULIS objected to the production of documents which were not proved or referred to in the case. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL submitted that he might re fer to contemporaneous documents to explain the meaning of a passage in an act of Parliament. After some discussion on this point the further argu ment of the case was adjourned till to-morrow morning, when the Learned Counsel on both sides will be prepared either to withhold documents of this description from the attention of the Court, or to discuss the legal propriety of referring to them in argument. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. LAMBETH- STREET. Yesterday Henry Murray, a young man with a most care-worn aspect, applied to the presiding Magistrates, Messrs. HARDWICK and HALSWELL, for their advice, under the following somewhat singular circumstances : The applicant, on the 19th day of September, 1815, was married by banns, in the parish church of Christ Church, Spitalfields, to a young woman named Elizabeth Smith. After living together for about four months his wife returned to the house of her mother in consequence of his being at the time out of employment, and though he had used every means in his power to prevail upon her to return it was all to no purpose. Some days ago, after a lengthened correspondence with his wife, he received a letter. The applicant here handed to Mr. Hardwick, of which the following is a copy : " October 31st, 183 G. " Sir—l am requested by Mrs. Ann Gutch to inform you that your claim upon her daughter as your wife is now invalidated, by reason of her name not having been duly registered as required by law. It has been necessary that she should be re-christened, by which she has received the name of Hannah Ann Gregory, in exchange for her late name of Elizabeth. You are hereby given to understand that she is your wife no longer, and she is now at liberty to wed whomsoever she pleases. Caution is hereby given you that should any disturbance, molestation, or interruption take place on your part, magisterial interference will be immediately resorted to. " N.B. For the purpose of ascertaining the validity of the said christening, apply to the vestry of the parish of St. Ann, Limehouse. Yours, &c. " CHARLES CLEMENTS. " I beg leave to add that the annulled certificate of your marriage is hereby returned, being of no avail whatever." The applicant, in consequence of the receipt of this letter proceeded to Limehouse Church, and there ascertained from the Rev. Mr. Williams that not only the christeninr , alluded to had taken place there, but on the same day the ' banns had been put up for the marriage of his (applicant's) wife with another man ; and by the advice of the Rev. Mr. Williams he came before their worships. Mr. HARDWIGK—What do you want us to do for you? We cannot restore to you your wife ; what is it you re quire ? Applicant—l want to know if I can prosecute my wife if she should get merried in my absence, as I am about going to sea ; and if I did whether or not the ex penses would fall on myself? Mr. HARDWICK—What was the name the female went by when you got married to her ? Applicant—Elizabeth Smith, your Worship. Mr. HARDWICK—Was that her real name ? Applicant —Y e s, Sir ; her father was a Custom House officer, but her mother got married a second time. Mr. HARDWICK remarked that it would form a strange era in the laws and customs of the country if the mere circumstance or ceremony of a second christening was to have all the force of a legal divorce in separating wife from husband, or husband from wife, and to screen the parties from legal consequences. Mr. HALswELL here asked wh o Mr. Clements, th e wr it er _ _ of the letter, was ; and the applicant replied that he was brother to the young man to whom his wife was about to get married. Mr. HAL!WELL concurred with Mr. HARDWICK as to the wife's liability to be indicted for bigamy if she married again, and told the applicant that the expense of the prose cution would be paid by the county. The application, from its novelty, excited a good deal of laughter among all present, except the applicant, who seemed very dolorous indeed. HATTON-GARDEN. Yesterday, Francis Jane, a jeweller, residing at No. 7, Taylor's-row, Northampton-square, Clerkenwell, stood charged with a series of cruelty towards Martha Jane, his own daughter, about eleven years of age. Inspector Ro binson, of G division, yesterday morninc , received informa tion that a girl was most cruelly treated by her parents at the above house, and on proceeding thither, he found the girl locked up in a dark and filthy cellar in a starving state, where she was compelled to sleep without any covering. On making inquiry, be was informed that she had been there ever since Monday morning last, and that the parents were living in comfort, and in easy circumstances. The girl had been previously forced to sleep under the stairs upon some shavings, and kept without food. The prisoner said that the girl was in the habit of mis conducting herself, and her mother-in-law bad inflicted the punishment upon her without his sanction. The girl said that she was afflicted. An inmate of the house proved that she was locked up without food, and the cruelty exercised towards her was so inhuman that she determined to give information to the police. Mr. ROGERS directed Mr. 'West to receive her into the workhouse, and compel the prisoner to allow something for her support, and he assured the prisoner if he did not ar.. range the matter satisfactorily with the parish that he would order him to find bail. The hearing of the caw excited the utmost indignation. THAMES OFFICE. SEAMBNS' WAGES.—Captain tVilson, the master of the ship Plan e t, a pp e ared yesterday t o answer th e complaint of his mate, Daniel Green, for refusing payment of his wages, 41. a month, for which he had signed articles, on a voyage from London to Gibraltar and Cadiz, and back. The mate stated, that among the cargo were two cases of champagne, marked " R. C.," in a diamond, which were to be landed at Cadiz, but which, by mistake, were landed at Gibraltar. The mistake was not discovered until the vessel reached Cadiz, and the captain sent back advices to his agents at Gibraltar to forward the cases to Cadiz, which was accordingly done. The captain now wished to deduct the expenses, 41. Is., from his wages. The mate declared that the mistake arose from the captain having ordered him to land all the cases marked " R. C.," in a diamond, at Gibraltar, and there were a great many so marked besides the cases of champagne. The captain gave particular orders to the mate not to send the two cases of champage ashore at Gibraltar, and all the cases were not marked alike. Mr. BALLANTINE said the mate had been guilty of neg lect, and ordered the expenses of the mistake to be dc• ducted from his wages, and made an order for the pay. ment of them on the captain, subject to that deduction, but without costs. The election of the Mayor of Bath took place on Wednesday last, and, with unanimity, Mr. Blair was re elected. This is a circumstance—the re-election of a Mayor the following year—that never occurred, we believe, in this city before. Under the old system, the election of a Mayor was a farce ; the profits, the fame, and the labours of all offices were divided among those who held public trusts unguarded by responsibility. This farce is now ended. The people have now a corporation of their own choice, and those whom they chose for the purpose have chosen a chief magistrate.—Bath Journal. DEPARTED AFFECTION.--Mr. James's interest ing new work, " The D esu lt ory M an ," w hi c h i s j us t pub lished, is indeed a worthy successor to " Richlieu," " John Marston Hall," and " The Gypsy." It is replete with beautiful thoughts, one of which is the following :—" How blighting is the loss of what we love ! Affection is as the sunshine of existence, and when it is gone the rest is all darkness. The flowers of life the beauties of being are all obscured, and we wander blindly on through an unseen world, which might as well be a desert as a garden in the deep shadow of that starlight night." COAL-PIT ACCIDENT.—On Sunday last a dread ful accident happened at Nofold Pit, near Ruarden, in this county. Six colliers were coming up from the pit in a skep (the usual number being only four), when the rope by which the skep was suspended gave way, and, the whole being precipitated to the bottom of the shaft, we regret to say that four were killed upon the spot. The other two men were dreadfully injured, but hopes are entertained of their recovery.—Gloucester Journal. MR. MIDSHIPMAN EASY.—There can be no doubt that works which are modelled from the events of real life are infinitely more powerful and effective than those which take their source from imagination. Captain Mar ryatt excels in the former description of writing, and in all his novels fancy is never allowed to break from the reins of truth. In " Mr. Midshipman Easy," which has just ap peared, lie has been singularly happy i n delineating life as i it is, and has exhibited its gaieties and its gravities, na manner peculiarly his own, and with the most graphic fidelity, SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. VESSELS ENTERED INWARDS AT THE OS' TOM-HOUSE, Nov. 16. The Sir Edward Banks, Norwood, from Rotterdam; Ocean,. Morfee, Antwerp; Wave, Cumming , M edemblik ; City of Hamburgh, Hart, Hamburgh ; Augusta, Delapay, Gravelines;a, Alkmaar, Heath, Rotterdam ; Sarah, Jones , Teneriffe; Min Mason, Guatamala ; Earl of Liverpool, Lomax, Ostend. ENTERED OUTWARDS FOR LOADING. The Pera, Fennings, for Constantinop le ; Prince: Buella• nan, Malta; Chlrlotte, Daniels, Calais ; Broml Mal drey,i Browni Trieste ; Margaret, Taylor, Tobago; Tapley , g, Cal' cutta ; Ocean, Morfee, Antwerp. CLEARED OUTWARDS WITH CARGO. The Ocean, Morfee, for Antwerp ; Georg e M‘Lean, Free body, Capecoast Castle; Northam, Carter, Harlingen; Charlotte, Daniels, Calais ; Europa, Lorctzen, Dram ; tine, Sandford, Trinidad. CLEARED OUTWARDS IN BALLAST. The Lark, Miller, for Muscat; Elizabeth, Rich, Elsineur: Ranger, May, South Whale Fishery; Julies, Michaels, Di' near; Eleanor, Barrett, South Seas. Pales- ARRIVALS AT LIVERPOOL, Nov. 15. The Royal Mint, Scott, from Denia; Lady Stormont, M'Minn, Bombay ; Thomas Parsons, Africa; Wolf's Cove, Quebec; James, Bell, Aricati; Luna, Bahia; City of Exe ter ' Salon. ENTERED FOR LOADING. The Adelaide, Smith, for Batavia • Isabella, Smith, Buenos Ayres; Hope, Swan, Barbadoes ; 'Adelaide, Perrian, Leg horn ; Friends, Falk, Monte Video; Matilda, Lawson, Malta ; Release, Curtis, Naples ; Gazelle, Evans, Newfound land ; Peri, Vivian, St. Michael's. CLEARED OUTWARDS. The Columbus, Peyster, for New York • Sisters, Sutton, Video; Burrell, Douglas, Sierra 'Leone ; Donald, Potts, Berbice; Pauline, Kraft, Elsineur • Carena, Genoa; Pearl, Stevens, Gibraltar. . Hayden, EAST INDIA SHIPPING. The Dapper, Dickinson, from Bengal, arrived in the Downs, and sailed from Calcutta June 15, and St. Helena, Sept. the Orissa, Rankine, from Singapore, arrived off P o rtsrnout h e o and sailed from Batavia July 3, and St. Helena Sept / 7 ; t d Mary White, Gavington, from Bombay, arrived off Cork, ell . sailed July 3, and St. Helena, Sept. 19; the Sir John Be j es .„, ford, Mitchell, from Bengal, arrived off Dover, and s ailed ir°, l ' o Calcutta May 19, Saugur May 24, and Cape, Sept. 3; I" d Jane, Finwick, from Calcutta, arrived off Liverpool, and 5.,, June 13, Saugur June 20, and St. Helena Sept. 19 ; the 1 "1 1 °,1 net, from New South 'Wales, arrived off Swansea, and sal c April 12, and Chili June 25. Arrivals at Bombay.—The Sulimany, July 18, from ChiPa; the Hon. Company's ship Clive, 18, from Suez and Mocha Departures from Bombay.—The Sir H. Compton, . 111 '7,,h il for Bengal ; the Eleanor, July 18, for Madras and Cf'. lol " — i . the Lord William Bentinck and Hinda, July 11, t! ae forM k, for London, and the latter for Liverpool—the Hir je la put the having been in contact with the Lord Williaw, Bentinck ; John Adam, July 20, for Madras and Calcp: aa , 0 Departures from Singapore.—The L ayton , May I`,' Adelaide, May 23, for China ; the Jartl;.ae, May 26, for Ma' ac it Arrivals at St. Helena.—The Coarleston Packet, SeP t &i e from whaling, and sailed on the 15th for ditto • the E r ., c 7 Sept. 12, from Calcutta, and sa il e d on t h e 1 3t h for oll' u l r the Alcide, Sept. 12, from Pad ang , an d sa il e d on the 14t " e Havre ; the Kyle, Sept. 14, f rom C a l cutta , an d sailed saw day for Liverpool ; the Margaretha Catharina, Sept. 1 4 , , : fr ., 05 , Batavia, and sailed on the 16th for Amsterdam ; the Sept. 17, from Bourbon, and sa il e d on t h e 18 t h f or Marseir;; the Nelson, Sept. 17, f rom Ti mor , an d sa il e d f or L° ll ,, u° t i: the George and Martha, S e pt. 17, put b ac k t o lann. Captain on account of illness, an d sa il e d aga i n f or the wo;„,- - ground ; the Vrow Hendrika, Sept. 17, from BatavietL in sailed on the 19th for Amsterdam • the Malay, Sept. IStL - 0 Sumatra, and sailed on the 21st for Salem ; the Sason• '", 1 1 , t ; 18, from Bourbon, and sailed on the 20th for Marseilles; 'fa Levant, Sept. 18, from Manilla, and sailed on the 19 01 I- New York. , or Departures from St. Hel e n a .—Th e Ell en , S e pt. I" t he Liverpool; the Lord Hoba r t, S e pt. 21, f or t h e CaPe; Nestor, Sept. 22, for London. ~ Arrival at Anjer.—The Saguenay, J une 29, from pool and the Cape, for Manilla. f r o nt Arrivals at Calcutta.—The Kea° Castle, June 3 0, Madras ; the Adolphe, July 4, fro m B our b on an d Mauritt7i., Departures from C a lcutta..—The Helen, July 2, for oi a-r to tius ; the Virginie, July 5, f or B om b ay ; t h e F erg usso..n , sail July 13, for China. un , o lol Passengers per the Lord William Bentinck, from "" at • (expected)—Captain Patters on , hi s M a j esty ' s 6 t h Regiul— p The following letter has been received at Lloyd's :--- , " Rio Grande, Aug. " 1 2 4, " The British brig Saripta, Bowell, arrived here Dec. re 1835, from Hamburgh, and pro cee d e d t o P ort Al e gre ; ` e e a loaded a cargo of hides for H am b urg h, b ut h as b ee n de!gila%a there ever since, in consequen ce o f th e s t oppage o f the in ci , navigation, caused by political disturbances in this pro/111.., It is now expected that the na v i ga ti on i n l an d w ill be free l'; e , short time, when she will be able to proceed on her 101A :0, but unless she has facilities for landinr, and beating her coi ll it is to be presumed that the hide w ill be materially injur ed worm." • MR. CANNlNG.—Fourteen days bef o re his de atb h Mr. Gallatin, the American envoy, spent six hours g? ro, him, two before dinner, all in talki ng a b ou t p o litical afra! lig and much of Mr. Canning's own situation and confliq so parties. Mr. Gall a ti n t o ld hi m h e cou ld not lire ami d . 0 1 much business. To be Secretary for 'Foreign Affa' ll ,, n i a 1 fact—First Lord o f th e T reasury i n fact and. name — ' o not only Prime Minister, but so l e Mi n i s t er. M r. CanPc; explained, that Lord Dudley on ly t oo k t h e place of Se c. ; 1 tary for Foreign Affairs to oblige him, and pro teapot But that he had bee n i n d uce d to come out o f t h a t °l s to with all the details of which he was acquainted, an d i r• take the Treasury, by h av i ng rece i ve d a l etter f ro m an s 4 ,, o cient friend of Mr. F ox , who t o ld hi m t h at M r . F o x altd o . regretted he had not taken that, as th ere li es the Pat-, s a g e ; and, said Mr. Cannin g , a lth oug h I m i g h t have pa friend there, it is very different my asking a favour , a h r e , favour being asked of me ; and I am determined, waving his hand with a most emphatic gesture of ambl a ; to hold the reins while I live.—He li ve d f our teen da_ . ,..9 - •; He told Mr. Gallatin he had not been fre e f rom great P9O since the Duke of York's funeral, when they kept 1 0 . 1 the cold damp vault two hours—nor slept a whole n',. n g since Lord Liverpool's illness. Such is worldly hormurT - o f the best thing the world's possession d oes f or us 1,--lif e Matthias Bruen, quoted in " The Dissenter." 0 1 PHYSIOGNOMY OF THE PUBLIC ME' " n d' FuANcr.—The French, as a nati on , ar..e far from ' O O some, though brilliant exceptions exist ; and it strika s o f that they who appear in public life are among the ugl,l of the whole people. Not long since I di ne d at t h e talhe M. de —, in company with Mr. B. of New York., „ o r ! company consisted of 20 men, all o f w h om h a d plaYe u .tell 1 spicuous parts in the course o f th e l as t 30 years . I P °l- a nd out the peculiarity just mention e d t o m y companion t he asked him if there was a sin g l e f ace at t a bl e w hi c h hau placid, dignified, and conteVted look which denotes the c e sciousness of right motives, a frank independence , f mind at ease with itself. We could not discover °fl e a w' have little doubt that national physiognomy is agat e national character.—Cooper's Residence in France. o f Last week an inquest was held at Nuan, eoun c t i v ol Clare, on the body of C a th er i ne C ommone , w h o was I°t•-•" dead at her cabin-door. The jury returned a ve rdia jt $ Died from the inclemency of the weather while 4 1 of temporary insanity." w e, At the White Lio n , Whit e ' s - a ll e y, Chancerrood a young man, appar en tly a b ou t 2,-.; years of age, was ",k ea, hanging by his handker c hief, qu it e d ea d, a t th r ee e'a' ° " o ala Tuesday afternoon. From a letter found on him, i t ‘ . 10 ,1, appear that he was from Kendall, 1 h estmorland ; Bs * was found in his pocket. On Monday last a little boy, named William, isb's ner, was sent by his parents , who r es id e a t No. 4, o ti ot ber court, Water-lane, Blackfriars, in company with en tbe re, boy, to school, on Garlick hill ; when they a rrived. the companion of the little fellow left him, and it be inb ntlf first day of his going, the neighbourhood was consecl ore strange. He has not since been heard of. He is l iveY od old, pitted with the small pox, light hair, dark ey e s , t0 22 ± 22211 and ... of his parents. __-- r T. COX SAVORY, Goldsmith, &c., 47, r `-'4ll l London, informs the Public, that he offers DESSERT t_..rtilei! KNIVES and FORKS, with plain ivory handles, silver te r ' OP plated on steel blades, at Three Guineas per dozen pair, solid silver blades, at Eight Guineas and a Half per dozen N. B. Carved ivory handles at 13s. 6d. extra per dozen e BIRTHS. On the 15th inst., at Albion-place, Hyde-park, the wif e a tb , Rev. M. Kinsey, of a daughter. :4- - of '' On the 14th inst., in Hart-street, Bloomsbury, the w" Hunter, Esq., surgeon, of a daughter. poo h On the 16th inst., in St. Helen's-place, the lady of 11 ' Es On q., of a son. Pk' the 12th inst., Lady Fanny , the lady of 0 . B. C o le, _.....-. of a daughter MARRID. t ici o On the 15th inst,, at St. Michael's, E „ Highgate, the Rev" rti„geo Henry Stoddart Say, of Braughin , Herts, g to Axnelia, a 0, daughter of the late IL N ixon, Es q. , of the Grove, 11igh.,!,0,, On the Bth inst., at Islay House, Islay, P. L. 13rooke, Mere hall, Cheshire , to Julia Se ymour Buccleugh, youngeo ter of the late Colonel Campbell, of Shawfield. DIED. is oldr On the 14th inst., at Laleham, Middlesex, Mrs. Susan De l aged 80. 1 a On the 13th inst., at Noel House Kensington, Major--,nand the Hight Hon. Viscount Forbes, con ' of the Earl of Granar y 11. p. for the county of Longford.' H. iteff On the 14th inst., Herbert Dudley eldest son of H. M. fla - Esq., of Craven-hill, aged four s 'and a half. wiis n on t , h r e sq l . 3 , t i l a r te in c st a . p , taatinLlazitghh-nstrraegeoto,nßs.urton-creseent, voini On the 12th ~0 of J. O B l e i l the Es l q 2 . t , h o i f n ß st. u , irulTsptipenareyßeedarford-place, Mrs• Bell, w'u -.'lM%?.:t Turnham-gyaen, Wm. Johnson, '`l' Lp dear Printed and Published by AIURDO YOUNG, cool 112 Strand, at The Sun O ffice, No. 112, Strand, in or Mitidlesex.—Thuriciay, November 17, 1136.