The Sun. — London, England, 1821-06-30 00:00:00

the Hon. and Gallant General pressed this mo tion .to a division, he should feel, bound to sup port him. As it was now unfortunately too late in the Session to discuss the principle of this Act, he should oppose this Resolution. He had no longer any means of destroying the monster, ex- Cept by starving laugh)—and on that principle he would resist the grant which was to support its progeny. The Hon. 11. G. BENNET said it was not his intention ,to speak of the general policy of the present measure, but there was.one circumstance to which he wished th e a tt en ti on o f the N o ble_ Lord. During the late disturbances a gentleman and.his son, with whom he was well acquainted, took refuge in a Spanish ship, and Sir William A'Court waited . on them, and expressed the deepest regret that they should be alarmed. He preVailed on them to come ashore, - and the am; merit they did, they were arrested, and put into one of the worst prisons in Italy. He wished the matter to be explained, and some directions be'given to Sir W, A'Court, for no, innocence, or no youth could escape the vengeplice of that Lazzaronian King. Tbe Marquis of, LONDONDERRY said he felt h;mseif called upon ; to reply to the Hon. Gen tieman lest his silence should be considered as • assenting to what he should alwaysconsider an abuse of the privileges of that llouse, narne,ly, a personal attack upon illustrious Sovereigns. With respect to . the transaction alluded to he never heard one word about it, and no King could be more revered or esteemed .by his subjects than the . King of Naples. Mr. BENNET hoped the Noble Lord would make it his biisinesSto inquire. Lord LONDONDERRY said, that he always con sidered it his duty to pay every attention to any communication from our Ambassador, but he did not think it necessary to apply to Sir William A'court on the subject. . Mr. BENNET deprecated the slightest idea of casting the least reflection upon Sir W. A'Court, with whom he was personally acquainted, and for whom he entertained a high re;pect. he was certain, however, the transaction alluded to had occurred. Lord MILTON said, that no rebuke from the Noble Lord should, ever prevent him from ex pressing his opinions upon the conduct of any foreign Monarell. . Mr. C. H. llKTcniNsos agreed with the No ble Lord, that Gentlemen ought not to avail themselves of their privilege in that House, for the purpose of attacking these-illustrious persons who were not presetitto defend themselves. But it was impossible . that they could shut their eyes upon ,the conduct of the Allied Sovereigns.— Thu had seen the King of Naples, an aged Mo much, compelled to leave his own capital,- more like a slave than a Sovereign, at the most unsea sonable period of the year. They had seen him, before his departure, take an oath to support that Constitution which he had before sworn to defend. They, bad seen hint afterwards forced by the Holy Alliance, to violate the solemn en gagement into which he bad entered with his people.—(Hear, hear!)—When they looked to these things (of which, by the bye, the . Noble Lord did appear to disapprove), it was impos sible, in the course ordiscussion, to avoid saying something which reflected on those Sovereigns who were the authofs of such proceedings.— (Question, question.)—He was not at all sur prised ,that those Gentlethen who had all along . supported those grants which brought the country into its present state of abject distress, and suffering ; and who at the end Of the SesSion came down as beggars to implore the repeal. of a Tax of 500,0001. as a boon to .their Constitu ents. He was not surprised, he said,.that these' Gentlemen should now shew themselves callous to that which affected the honour and the best interests of the country. The HOnourable Mem: ber proceeded to condemn in strong terms the in troduction of the. Alien• Act, and concluded by opposing the Resolution.—The House then di vided— For the Resolution - 44 ' Against it - - - - 27 -Majority for it - - - Sir R. WILSON prespted a Petition from Clapham, in favour of the Cruelty to Animals Bill.—Laid on the Table. ALLOWANCE TO THE DUKE OF CLARENCE. The CHANCELLOR of the . EXCIIEQUER moved the Order of the Day for the third reading of the ";3ill for making a proxision for the-Duke. of Cla— reti Ce. Mr. CREI:VEY said he had many objections as wOl to the principle of the Bill as to the manner in iv•hich it was brought forward. First, lie thought it.was brought forward too late 'in the Session ; he aiiiught too; with great subthigsion to the Chair, that:it ought to .haveheen preceded b'y sake, from the Crown ; ;and his' next objection was that it sheaved an aPpearanCe of faVouritisin for one branch of the Royal . Family, to . the negleCt of another.. The present Queen had volUntarily given up 15,0001. a year. It was t rue al so th a t the Duke of Clarence had given tip6,9001.a year is 1814; but the difference was, .that the Queen ,gave up her's .because she thought it too 'much, and the Duke gave tip - his _because he thought it :ioo 'little. 'lt was hard that the people should be called upon to'make this provision in the same Session in which they had been loaded with the eXpences of the trial of the'Queen,.6 trial iti it s.elfso iniivitous, and so contrary to,the opinions of ihiAe same peoßle.-1-Ie was .justified, in calling upon the House to refuse this grant; in corise-`i Claimant of •the ferociOns conduct of the Nobl e Claimant on. this disgraceful trial. ' 4 :The - Marquis of LoNpONnErtrtY rose to order. Vrisubmitted that observations of such a nature mere highly disoi6rly. ' .. .The SPEAKER said he thought there should be some' measure observed in remarking" upon the' conduct of IWeinbers of the other House.. ..-Mr.CitEivni said he spoke only of the public c'aiichtct of the Duke of Clarence, Who was now suitor to that ItotiSe. The- CliAN6ir.Lon of the EXCHEQUgIi. inter- 1 poied, and said it was out of oi,dei.t4"ttlimbeaq lalpon'the individual public conduct of any_Nfetn 4 - i;ei of khe'othei - House. - Mr. CREEVEIi said he hail 'do wish to go out of the way to offend any Member of the Royal Fa taily.—But he had himself witnessed the trial in question ; and had heard the Duke give his judg ment of Guilty by pronouncing the word " COn; tent," and in a tone which he (Mr. C.) had never heard before in any civilized society."---(There was here a general call of Order.") The SPEAKER:said, he lelieved no Member of the House was more anxious to defend the .fre e dorn of debate than the Hon.Mernber. Would not that •Hon. Member, then, think this right in fringed'upon, if any person in any other place were to arraign his (Mr. C.'s) conduct in that House ? lie put •it -to the House, and to the Hon. Meniber himself, to apply this, principle to the remarks for which the Hon. Member had been called to order. Mr. CREEVEY begged to apologise. He- had spoken under the influence of strong feelings, and he would therefore not say . another word upon that part of the subject. He conceived, however, time he had a right to observe _upon the expence of the approaching Coronation. - It had been called a solemn occasion-4 compact be tween the King and his people; he (Mr.Creevey) believed it was not so regarded by the people, and he was borne out- in this by the fact that there was•tio national sympathy on the subject.— The 'present situation of the -Queen probably ac counted for the apathy which was so generally- observed. Upon the question of . Law as. to her_ right 'to be crowned, he professed him Self unable' to give an opinion ; but he had heard that she . was not even to be present. lie trusted this was not the case ;- he trusted that. the Noble Mar-, quis would not set the King and Queen in open array against each other. :,Vith respect to the present Bill, as his ObjectiOn, to it was upon prin. 7 . ciple, he certainly would. be no party to it. Mr. GEORGE BANKFS said, he o;c:ought there was no subject less relevant to the present ques tion, than the case of the Queen. The Duke ofj Clarence had acted with perfect consistency in refusing the money in the firstinstance, and in accepting it now. His refusal was caused by the belief that the Lady whom he was about to marry would object to live in England on so limited an income. She had, however, consented ; and he (Mr. B.) thought it was generous in the Duke to refuse the money, when he thought he must necessarily spend it in a foreign country. Upon the ground of the annual sum he was glad to observe, there was scarcely any difference of opinion ; and, on that of the arrears, he trusted there would be as little. Mr. HARBORD said, he was willing to vote for the -60001. a year, but not for the arrears. The case of the Queen had, he thought, been very properly introduced ; for, if.the claim of the. Duke was to be allowed as to the arrears, the Queen would have a right to demand 105,0001. for - the arrears of that which she had formerly given up. In such a case he did not see how the Hon. Gentleman opposite could vote against the claim. He should himself vote against it, as he should against the present, and in so doing he conceived he should be consistent. He thought personal 'considerations very objectionable. He wished equally to avoid adulation on the one hand, and insult on the other. When he had an opportunity of doing so, he should support the annual sum, but should oppose the arrears. Sir L COFFIN said a few words in support of the Pill. Mr. BENNETT said, his opinion was decidedly against the whole grant. Ile should not enter into any question of a- personal nature, but be could not refrain from observing, that the Coro nation was ill suited to the poverty of the Country. It was an old remark, that a country sick at heart should not put on a smiling face. He thought the expenditure of 100,0001. upon a mere page antry was much to be censured, especially as the people would not participate in the festivity. If the Treasury were full, he should see no great objection to it, but when mourning was too visi ble in all our streets, he protested against the un necessary expenditure of so large a sum of pub lic money. - The Marquess of LONDONDERRY deprecated the drawing of so exaggerated a picture respect ing the state of the country. The effect could not but have a tendency to turn the feelings of the people against a ceremony. forming an im portant part of our ancient institutions. Upon some occasions the Hon. Members opposite thought there was no limit to .our national re sources. That was always when they attempted to engage the Government in an interference with the affairs of other countries ; when, however ; an expellee was'to -- be incurred for the Coronation 'of the Sovereign (for that which had been rightly called the completion of a compact between him and his people), then, indeed, those Hon. Mem bers were very eloquent upon the subject of our distress. He feared, too, that the painful pic ture which had, been exhibited last year was highly coloured by the- Hon. Gentlemen oppo ;site,• and was brought forward to revive feelings 'which were' nearly extinct. When the lion. Members advocated the cause of what they call ed, universal liberty, but which he called uni versal confusion, they spoke with lofty grandeur of our resources, but when an expence was .suggested - for a • most constitutional purpose, their hearts actually overran with tenderness. (Hear, hear.)—He could assurethe House, that otr the approaching ceremony n6thing had been done with a view to idle parade, and that every part of the solemnity had been arranged with the utmost attention to judidous economy. He was convinced the people of this country would not have evinced' that discontent spoken of relative to a late occasion, had it 'not been for the sugges tions of the Hon. Member for Appleby, and those who sat about him. He protested against the exaggeration of those Hon. Gentlemen on the present occasion. Ile should feel that his Ma jesty's Ministers had given unconstitutional ad., vice to his Majesty had they not advised that he i should take the.earliest moment to seal' by: the august ceremony of the Coronation, the solemn compact, both civil and religious, entered int 6 Vetwixe . his "Majesty and his people.—(Hear !) Mr. Humc took the earliest opportunity, as one lof those' taunted by the Noble Lord opposite, who had accomplished tie agitation of the country on the occasion of the Queen's•triaLL-: He threw back the taunt to the Noble Lord. It was be and the Privy Council who were the fire brand on that occasion. tt was the Noble Lord and his friends s who, in attempting to arraign the Queen of England at the Bar of a Tribunal where the Judge and Juror were united in the same person, had raised the country in her be half. They only did so, because they knew she was innocent; but they could not now say she was unprotected. They thought she would be an easy victim, and as for saying that the indig nant feelings of the nation were extinct, they would live long after the career of the Noble Lord was ended. The Noble Lord had called the ensuing Coronation an august and sacred in stitetion. It was impossible any thing could he sa-zred from which justice was excluded. If the King bad a right to be crowned, the Queen had also. The Noble Lord and a Noble Earl in another place had, in his hearing, pledged them selves that if her Majesty were acquitted, she would be entitled to all her rights as Queen. None had more deviated from all the principles of Christianity than the Noble Lord and his col leagues in the treatment of the Queen, and yet he (Mr. Hume) and his friends were to be charged with all the criminality of what they were all along anxious to avert. Ile would ad vise Ministers to be just both to the King and Queen. He wished to see his Majesty crowned, but he did not want to see him degraded in the eyes of the country, by an act of injustice to one who was so nearly allied by blood to the late King. Mr. F. PALMER said, he should vote against the grant of the arrears, which he assured the Hon. Gentlemen opposit e was cons id ere d out of i doors as a most profligate grant. He thought the Noble Lord most unjust in, taunting his Hon. Friends with causing the agitation of the public mind with respect to the Queen; and also with being advocates for squandering public money in support of wars on the Continent. They wished to allay that irritation by causing to be done what was just, and wished the italuence of the Govern ment to be employed to prevent the wars in question. Mr. W. SMITH defended the conduct of him self and his lion. Friends in the late trial of the Queen. With respect to . their anxiety to meddle in the wars on the Continent, he believed it never had been proposed on their part, but with the expectation that, instead of fomenting, it would put an end to hostilities. With regard to the Coronation, he thought the money had better be spared to the country. It might a Constitu tional ceremony, but he was sure that it would not in any way tend to strengthen the ties be twixt- the Sovereign and the subject. His Ma jesty-would be regarded as the legal, legitimate, hereditary Sovereig n of the nation with ou t th e ceremony. On th e question before the House he had only to'say, he should not vote for the grant of the arrears. Mr. BATHURST saw With regret the systematic attempt that was made to degrade the august ce remony of the Coronation of - the King of England in the eyes of the nation. Honour able Members ought to remember that there was a solemn oath to be taken by the Sovereign, which could only be taken on such an occasion. To degrade the ceremony was to undermine the Constitution of the Country. With regard to the expellees, a great part of it was already incurred. Independent of the ex pence which would'fall on the nation to discharge, a great sum of money must be expended by those who were obligated to attend, which could not fail to be most grateful to the labouring classes, which, indeed, was already felt as highly bene ficial. The Hon. Member opposite (Mr. Smith) ought to remember that the result of an inter ference on our part in the affairs of the Continent on a late occasion, might have been to plunge us into war. It- might have been otherwise, - but that was the alternative we should have hid, if our negociations to procure peace had failed. With regard to the Queen, it could not be doubt ed that the efforts of the lion. Gentlemen oppo site had very much excited the irritation in the country complained of. If the people were averse from such proper ceremonies of our Con stitution, it were fit they should be familiarised to them. Mr. HOBTIOUST doubted very much of the le gality of crowning the King without the Queen. The Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Bathurst's) arguments hi favour of the Coronation . appeared to him of a very curious - nature. In the first place, he wished to make out that the poor would be benefitted by the expenditure of money first drawn out of their pockets. Then, with regard -to- the oath, it did not follow that because a cer tain thing was enjoined in case of the occurrence of a certain event, that therefore that event was enjoined. With respect to the Bill before the, House, he certainly should not vote for the grant of the arrears. He'thought that those who paid had a right. to estimate the character of those to whom they paid, and grant in proportion. Lord MILTON confessed he felt altogether in different as to the ceremony of the Coronation of the king. lie knew:that the history of England taught that it was an august ceremony.; but he did not think it would add one more obli ga ti on to the allegiance of the* subject, or one more to the Sovereign to observe the laws. The SPEAKER then left the Chair, Mr. FROG. DEN presiding as Chairman of the Committee. • . . On the reading of the Grant of 6,0001. a year t 6 the Duke of Clarence from the year 1818, My. HUME moved, as an amendment, that instead of 1818, the Grant to commence from 1821. - - . 'the Marquis of LoNtioNnEnay, before the House divided on the.question, begged to enter his 'protest against any thing in the case of the Queen bearing as a precedent on, the Present grant to the Duke of • Clarence considered that the_ honSe..ought.not to' object to make the grant retrospectivel y , as it would• only be - lacing . themselves and- the Duke of Clarence in the same situation they were content to be in a few years ago. ,NOthing had occurred to alter the relative position af . the parties. his Royal Highness had lived abroad for one, year, and his conduct there was of a nature .to exalt .him in the eyes of the house and the country, and he could not, con ceive that Pailiarnent Weald not bt as, willing now -as . then .to relieve his Royal Highness from his embarrassments. Mr. HUME did not wonder at the part taken by the Noble Marquess. , fie was of course anxious to get that for the Duke of Clarence which his advice had perhaps lost him before. — He (Mr. H ume) objected to the arrears as a pre cedent. He had always advised the Noble Lord to separate the two grants. There was this marked difference betwe en th e Queen's case and the Royal Dukes—her Majesty gave up part of her inconte, because she thought it too much— his Royal Highness would not have his, because he thought it too little. The House then divided— - - - 24 54 -30 For the Amendment Against. it • Majority in favour of the original Grant The Report was ordered to be received to-morrow . LOTTERY BILL. Thee FIANC E LLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the second reading.of this Bill. 1111 BENNET protested against this Bill as an encourage ment to immorality and vice. He believed it had a greater ten dency to fill the prisons with culprits, than all other public measures put toether. Mr. MONCf 'loped this would be the last time his Ma jesty's Ministers would resort to this means of increasing the revenue. Sir S. MORLAND hoped, if the measure were resorted to again, it would be very much reduced in extent. The public taste was beginning to slacken with respect to it ; and he hoped, if it were • not put an end to in any other way, it would by that means. Mr. BROUGHAM was the less mortified at the silence of the Chancellor of the Exchequer,, because he knew what he would .say. He knew that he would say, in reply to these complaints, that he could not afford to give up the measure in the present state of the finances. This was the very excuse the Portuguese offered for continuing the.-abominable traffic in slaves. The public knew that the whole system was a cheat; that the Lottery Tickets were an imposition ; a'nd he hoped that 'if the Chancellor of the Exchequer could continue after this to profit by such means, that the people Would foil hint by deserting, the plan altogether. The Bill was then read a second time, a nd or d ere d t o b e. committed on Monday.• - APPROPRIATION BILL. Oh the motion of the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHE QUER, the House went into a Committee on the Appropria tion Bill, Mr. •HUME said, he would not detain the House but a few minutes ; he had proposed to have taken up a longer portion of their time, but as several of his friends on that side of the house had been obliged to go, he should content himself with an oh servation on one or two items. Ile wished to call the attention of the Noble Lord opposite to the expence of the office of Pay master for the Half-pay, which he thought might be dispensed with, and the expqnse to the country saved. The Recruiting Service also was a. subject worthy of their notice. The depot at Maidstone was kept up at a great expense for repairS", &c. though it was only a temporary barrack, whilst there were plenty of regul a r b arrac k s vacant , an d m i g h t b e appropriated for that purpose. Ile observed on the great amount of the an hual salaries to the officers of the dock-yards, who were, by the altered value of money, receiving ten per rent. more than dur ing the war; though their duti es were diminished. The expenie - of Port Admiral at Porismquth and Plymouth were' in 1792 only 1,4701. but now as a full Admiral was kept at both those places, the expense amounted to 3,78fi1.; the difference he thought might well be saved, as a Vice-Admiral would'surely be suf ficient. He hoped Government would abandon the `prac tice of purchasing foreign wood for' the buildihg of our ships : we had plenty of wood in this country as fit for that purpose as any that could be procured from the Adri atic. He trusted as Ministers had agreed to an *Address to the Crown, recommending retrenchment, that the Noble Mar quis would lend his cordial.assistance. .On reconsideration he was better satisfied with the Address which had been carried; - than with the one which he had himself proposed,:•and he hoped the Noble Marquess would be found a zealous suppor-: ter of it. - In the part whieh he had taken 'during the Session, he thought he had proved himself the best friend of-the Noble Marquess. The Mitiquis of .LONDONDERItY begged to assure the Honourable Member that neither his Address nor that of his' Honourable Friend (Mr. Bankes) was wanted to enforce on Ministers the necessity of economy. He was happy-to observe, froin the goad-humour which the Honourable Member had displayed, that the debates of the Session 'had not:shared his temper—that good h u mo ur m us t make him a very valuable ac quisition to - the society .Which he was goinkto.enjoy.' • The Bill was then ordered to be recommitted to-morrow. METROPOLIS POLICE . _ _ After which the House resumed, and went into a Cornniitteg on the Metropolis Police Bill. . Mr. BENNET objected to th e clause for apprehending suspicious characters, as tending not to suppress crime, but to put money into the pockets of Police officers. He mentioned an instance where a robbery of goods to . the amount of 4,0001. was committed, and th e me r ch an t o n applying to the Police officers was at last induced to give 4001. when he had the goods replaced" in warehotise. The state of the public parks • aiso . were such that no modest women could walk in them without insult, except in the public places. He recommended that an efficient Police should' be employed to render those places safe for the King's lieges to pass, instead of "being, as they at pre sent were, - public nuisances. Another Subject to which he wished to call the attention of Ministers, was the immens e number of fairs in the v i c i n ity o f the Metropolis. Between summer and autumn there were no less than eighty-four fairs within ten miles of London. 'Whatever use they might have been crfformerly, - therwere at present only places of assemblage for all the loose - and &orderly persons of the:Metropolis, - and more ruinous to youth than any other thing that he was . aware of, Within gunshot of that House, at Tothill-fields, every species of disorder was committed with impunity, for the Police were not strong enough to repress them. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL defended the clause object ed to by the Hon.. Member • it was in principle the same as a clause enacted in the 17th Gee. 11. from which no inconvenience had ever resulted. Mr. BENNETT explairied. • Mr. Alderman BRIDGES. hoped the censure of the. Hon. Gentleman was not applicable to the police officers of the City., He agreed with the Hon. Member in reprobating the faimin the neighbourhood of the Metropolis, and wished that they could be suppressed altogether. Dr. LUSHINGTONbeIieved that a very large proportion of offences had arisen from persons attending -the fairs in ques tion. Ever since he had been a Member of that House, he had thought of proposing a Bill for suppressing them: If something were not done by his Majesty's Ministers in the ensuing Ses sion, lie certainly should feel it his duty to propose some mea sure on• the subject. He had himself passed by West End Fair at the time . these outrages took place, when one man lost his life, and was a witness that the police were incompetent to re strain them. Sir W. DE CRESPIGNY agreed in censuring the fairs, as• congregating together a number of characters of the worst de scription. In his neighbourhood, at the fair time, robberies were frequent. The study of Lord Camden, his near neighbour, was broken into, and the trackS or the thieves were discovered next morning strewed with Cabinet papers, which were flying about the park. The remaining clauses of the Bill were severally agreed to. The House then resumed, and the Bill was ordered to be re ported to-morrow.. EXTRA POST BILL. • On the motion of the CiIANCELLOR of the ExciiEQuEtt, that the Douse resolve itself into a Committee on this Bill, Dr. LUSHINGTON_ rose to oppose it. He did so on va rious grounds, contending that the present mail-coaches went at as rapid a rate as the usual light coaches ; that if the rate was increased to 11 miles an hour it was impossible to prevent aecidents ; that as these coaches were only to be established for particular places, an undde preference would thus be given to those places, over others where no such accommodation was af forded, and that this departure from our established practice would create great inconvenience to the post office, and produce a great derangernent in the system of mail.coach communica tion; without a proportional advantage to any party. • Sir R. WILSON defended the Bill. Post chaises and four, which usually ran at the rate of 10 ' miles' an hour, created no sphere for accidents ; and from the 'construction of the proposed coaches adrintting Of chinging horses with greater cele rity, they could go 11 miles an hour with as little danger 'of doing mischief. MONCK opposed the motion. The CHANCE LLOR of the EXCHEQUER observed, that great as was the respect which he felt for any - recommendation that proceeded from a Committee of the House, still he would not support a mischievous or dangerous proposition, even though it were supported by their sanction. The present plan was,_ in his opinion, neither dangerous nor mischievous. The accelarated rate at which the mails would travel by it would not increase the number of accidents. Indeed' a very heavy 'car riage.vms more likely to produce Accidents than the light vehicle which.the present projector had devised. Mr:- T. WILSON objected to the proposed plan, and com plained of the inadequacy of the vehicle bywhich it was intend ed that this extra roost should be carried. The plan, unless it were made general', would be both prejudici a l a nd unfair. i Mr. WARRE was of opinion, that a carriage rnightgo safely at the accelerated rate now proposcd ; but the projector ed to him to be attempting too much. Sir W. 1)E CRESPIGNY trusted the .11ouge would not assent to the acts of cruelty towards horsea,'whien-this Bill, if passed into a law, would sanction.' Mr. J.BEENET'T supprted the origir.al-inotiOn. - - Mi. lIARBORD objected to it on three grounds ; the first was ift inhumanity to horses the second its parti a l operation, and the third the danger which it would 61..4.Tc:i0n to rig Ma_ jesty's subjects fifty the furious.driving Which must necestaTily; ensue from it. Sir ,J. 11 . 1 A RJO R IBA NKS trust e d .th a t if.this met with the approval of Parliament, its operation would not he extended to Scotland, where it was universally di ;liked. Mr. F. PALMER had no objection to the experiment being made, as it was to be made at the risk of the projector, and not at the expence of the public. Sir F. 0111 MANE Y . argued in favoUr of th e amen d men t. The House then divided. upon the amendment, when there appeared _ _ Ayes, 23 I Noes, 321 Majority, 4. The House then went into a Committee on the Bill. A short discussion took place upon its several clauses, in which Mr. Warre, Mr. Bright, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Dr. Lushington, Sir J. Ma'.rjoribanks, Mr. J. Benett, Mr. Wrot.. teslev-, and Mr. T. Wilson, took a part. - The clauses were agreed to; but on the queStion th a t th e Chairman dO report the Bill to the House, a division took place,. when there appeared— Ayes - - 33 I Noes • - = 30i Majority - , 3. . The House then resumed, and the Report was ordered to be received on Monday next. ' CRUELTY TO HORSES BILL. Sir WM. DE CBES PIGN I' presented a P e titi on f rom the Inhabitants of Camberwell in favour of the 111 Treatment of horses Bill.--Ordered to be laid on the Table. Mr. 11. MARTIN moved the Order of the Day for the third reading of the. Cruelty to Horses Bill, and the House proceedzd immediately to a division, which was as follows :--: . - Ayes - . - - Nos - - - - 13 . - . Majority - - • —24 . . . The Bill was accordingly read the third time and passed. - The other Orders of the Day were then disposfxl of, kad the House adjourned at TWELVE O'CLOCK. MAJORITY AND MINORITY rOR AND AGAINST MR. HUME'S MOTION ron..t.i; ADDTI7,P.3 TO THE CROWN, TO ENFORCE TUE MOST RIGID ECONO. MY IN EVERY' DEPARTMENT 'or TUE &TATE.—JUN EX . - MAJORIT V. •• Arbuthnot,Rt lion. Dunally. Lord Owen, Sir 'John C. •• - Ellison, C. • Osborne, Sir John Apsley, Lord - Pane, J. Pole, Rt. lin. W. W.- Alexander, J.. Fane, V. Palinerstone, Lord Ancram, Lord - Fane, T. Phipps.- iFin. Ed. Beresford, Lord G. French, Arthur Peel, lit. lion. R. Bathurst,Rt.lin.B. Fleming, J. Peel, W.. . - Burgh, Sir U. Fleming, J. Powell, E. W. Blake, R. - Forester, F. Pakenharo,_tiod.H. Bent, John - Fynes, Henry - Pears , S, John Barry, Rt.Hn.J.3I. Grant, Rt. lin. C. Peniuddock J. H. Blair, J. H. Gifford, Sir R. Pennant G. , Blair, J. Gbulbtirn, Henry Prendergast, -J. -T. Baißie, John : • - Gossett, W. Pringle, Sir W. Beckett, Rt. Hn. J. Greville; Hn. Sir C. Robinson, Hon. F. Bradshaw - , R. H. Gordon, lion. W. Robertson. A. Browne, Rt. Hn. D. Gascoyne, Gen. RickettS, C. M. Brandling, C. HuskiSstin,Rt.Hon. Russell, J. W. Bourne,. Rt. Hon. W. smith, J. A. W. . Harding, Sir H. Stopfcird,' Lord . Bankes, H. Hulse, Sir C. Scott, Hon. J. Broadhead, T. H. HaWkins, Sir C. Scott, S. C. Binning, Lord Harvey,. Sir E. SUMner i . G. H.' Brecknock, Lord Holford, G. P. Somewt, Lord G. BrowilloW, C. Holmes, W. Somerset, Lordlt. Bernard, Visct. Hotham, Lord Stuart, A. . . Bentinek, Lord F. Bill, Sir G. • Strutt, J. H. - Bregden, J. Hart, General SotlicrOn, Admiral Calvert, John Irving, John . - - TwisS 'Horace Calthorpe,.lion. H. Kingsborough, Ld Trernityne,, J. IL Cockburne, Sirti. Lascelles; 1, ise. 'Tull;; C.. . .. Clive, Lord Leg!), T.. Thynne, Liiid J. Clive, lion. R. Lygon, Hon', H. Taylor, Sir 1-1. '. CliVe, Hen. ,Lindsay, Lord - Thomson, V. Courtenay, T. P. Lindsay, Hon. H. Ure, iII. Courtenay, W. Lewis, 'l'. F. : Upton, Hon. 21. Cranborne, Visct. " Lennox, Lord. G. Vansittart, Eight. Cheere; E. M. Londonderry, Mar. ~ Hon. N. . Clerk, Sir G. . guess of Vernim, George.: '-: Cuniroing, G.. ' Long, Rt. Hit SirC. Valletort,' Vise., Claughton, I'. Lowther, J. H. Willase,Rt..ll4: Cust, l ion. E. _ Lowther, J. W ar d, R o bt. (:fist, - Zion. P. Marioribanks„SirJ. Wells,ll'arr John nder,.Sir G: 0U.44fA111. W. ' Martin, sir B. CroSbie,j. . Martin, R. Wilson, Thomas - Cole; -Sir L. . , Mansfield, .7. Wilson, Sir Henry CholineleY, Sir M. Metcalf, H. . Wrottesley, 11, „. Chichester,, A-. • ,Manners, Lord C. Wodil, Col. Clements, Hon. J. Macdonald, Ronald Wodehouse, lin. J Cotwrove, Sir W. Money, W. T. .Irodehous2, Ed. Dawkins,• H. Manning, W. Ward, J. W. , - Don, Sir A. Macnighto n , E. A. Wigram, W. DO4ton G. Monday, George Westenra,- Hon? N . Dundits, ' Rt.lln.W. Musgrave, Sir I'. Wilmot, R. • Drake, 'l'. T. . Magumis, Rich. 1,417,0i1brt r i o ey ham , J ,.. S E . d. Dalrymple, A. .1. Mit c h e ll, John Douglas, W. R. K. Morland, Sir S. B. Walpole, Lord • • Dowdeswell l J. Nolan, 31. 1 I'illiarns, R. ' ' Dawson, G. Nicholl, lit. Hon. W emyss, J. Dodson, .John Sir J. ' Tizi.l.Ens—Henry, .Bankes and T. S. Gooch.. M I NOR TT Y. Abercromby,lln.J. Evans, William Moore, Peter Allen, J. H. Fergusson, Sir R. Marryatt, Jos , Baring, A. Fitzgerald, Lord W. .Neville, Ilan. B- Barnard, Lord Fitzroy, Lord C. NeWm;ui R. IT% Becher, W. W. Farrand, Robt. N ugen t, Lord Bennet, Hon.H..G. G ra tt an , J. Osston Bernal, R. Gordon, Robt. , d. Birch, J. Grenfell, P. P e i rse , H. Brougham, H. .Gui se , Si r W. Philli ps, G . jun' Bright, Henry • Ilaldim an d, W. Powlett, Hun. SV- Burdett, Sir F. Harbord, Ed. Price, R. . Palmerul.,l,. F. ilyng, George Il ea th eote , G. J. Robarts, G. Burrell, Sir C. Ilobhouse, J. C. Robarts, A. Burrell, Walter Htineywood, W. P. lZobinson, Sir Geo- Benett, John Hughes, W. L. Rowley, Sir %V- Calcraft, John Ilurst, R. Rumbold, C. .Calvert, N. Hutchinson, Hn. C. Rice, T. S. Calvert, C. James, W. Smith, Carter, J. L e mo n , Si r W. Smith, Cavendish, Lord G. Lloyd, .T. M. Smythe, J. H. Cavendish, H. Lester, B. L. Scarlett, J. Cavendish, C. Langston, G. Scuilaniore, IL Clifford, Capt. Maberly, J. Sefton Earl of, . Coke, T. W. M a b er ly, W. L. Tierney, Rt.frii.6"- Crespigny, Sir W. Macdonald, Jas. Tichfield, Max+ Creevey, T. 31 4 Intosh, Sir J. Warre J. A. Denison, W..T. M ar tin, John Western, C. C- Denman, Thos. Maxwell, J. Whitbread, -- Duntlas l Hon. T. Milbank, M. Williams, Duncannon, Vi..l. Milton, Viscount Williams, Ebrington, Visct. Monck, J. B. Wilson Sir rt; ) Ellice, Ed. ' .. . TELLERS-J. Hume and the Marquess of Tavistock. _ COURSE OF EXCHANGE, June 29. X mstet tlam Ditto, at Sight Rotterdam l2 19 Antwerp 1.2 12 di Hainburgh • 3B lo Sq., Altona. Paris, 3 Day's sight • •25 85 0 v B , Ditto i o Bourdeanx, ditto e Frank fort on the Main Madrid , Cadiz Bilboa 354 gi k " . Barcelona - Seville Gibraltar Legho4n Gel va .. ';4 --- Venice, Ital. Li v 27 0 Malta 45 -Naples •196. 43,*, PalerwO Lisbon Oporto Rio Janeiro Dublin .... Df ...... Cork 9 per Cgot' BULLI ON. 0 Portnsal Goldin Coin 31 0- petal. 101 Foreign Gold, in Bars New Douhkons 0 0• • • New iloUars, o 4 Silver in Bass. * ********* : ............................ o ` 4 194 LO O N FF D I P CE N , : N Printed o i ,l;2, Onnond-street, Queen-square ; and published t3y. W._ A• SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South Molten-street,. at TfrE ORDERS, LETTERS, ltc. (post-paid) Mlle. be udklurzt. - (1. where ADVERTISE7,II;:X7S, bYStjr..alnld .C:ARSTA B. s, of No; 29, Gnat