The Sun. — London, England, 1821-03-10 00:00:00

to:the Noble Loal;a-meaning which he had Ilk:- claimed ; but he must be allowed-to say, -he had mistaken the•Noble . Lord's meaningat the time ; and had understood-him as reading a lecture to th - e People of .Ett:4larid to refrain from petitioning i t future. - .tit%MoNtcx said, that as the Mover on this oc casion hail discovered the unfortunate paragraph in question to be false, and another had discover ed it was :libellous as well as false, he should not be surprised if the Attorney-General was to find out thcit it was also blasphemous and seditious. .Now with regard to the paragraph and the reflec tion it was said to convey on the House, if G entle men would read it they would see that all the re flrction was cast on Lord Castlereagh, and that the House escaped free. lie considered the whole as a political squib, and as such it ought to be passed over. • Lord CASTLEREIGn did not know whether the Hon. Mernber was here as counsel for the Printer --(Spoke,. spoke.)--The paragraph I-as particu larly levelled at hiM, and he hoped in courtesy to meet indulgence. I f the Hon. Member intend - - rd -19 defend.the, paragraph, he should, against his inJinatiou, be forced to support the motion against the Printer. Mr. Cu uwEN hoped the motion would be with erawn. Mr. S. Worrrt.Y.y had no. objection to with erawiiig the motion, if Gentlemen ceased to clefend the paragraph ; but he on his conscience believed the paragraph affected even the safety of the 'House ; and Whilit - he saw any party or ,set of men in the House inclined to defend the paragraph, he would divide the House, even thirigh he should go out alone. Mr. J. P. GRANT said, no Member could in tend to defend the paragraph in question, in the view. - the Hon. Member seemed to insinuate. He considered the paragraph as most indiscreet, and as such condemned it.- He trusted, however, the lion: Member would withdraw his motion. Mr. HoßilOusE doubted Muchif the House had the power to entertain this motion. Ile SPEAKER said, no doubt could exist of the powcr of the House to inquireinto a gross breach of their pzivilege. Mr. ,lionHousr said, he must bow to the au thority of the Chair ; but he must observe, that the Hen. Member for .Yorkshire must not attempt to make a condition the ground of withdrawing his motion ; for he could not consent to say he con sidered.this paragraph as imprOper. The Hon. IVrember said, he knew .of nothing so calculated to'injUre, the House as such publications as this ; he would tell the House what was much more miSchievo-us; namely, such motions as the pre sent. : The Noble Lord last .Session had given what he (Mr. H.) considered as a most discreet opinion on the subject of The Western Luminary. The Tioble Lord said, if they began to notice these. things it would be impossible .to say where they would end. So he would say no r w, for was there a day in which libels were not published reflecting on Gentlemen on his side of the House --for-himself in particular, was there a day in which he was not represented as a person desirous of overthrowing .the Constitution. The Hon. Gentleman's friends might be obliged to him for h.is defence of them, especially when it was re collected, that on one occasion he had voted them incapable ; but of that he did not complain, as some new lights might have broken in upon him since. Mr. S. WORTLEY declared, that consistent with his notion of duty he could not withdraw Lis motion.—Mr. 13tvaING opposed the motion. BA•ruoltsT thought the motion could not he withdrawn unconditionally,. there must be sorne censure expressed upon it. Sir R. Fr.r.ouso's said, on a former night he had expressed himself with great warmth on the language used by the Noble Lord. The Noble Lord's explanation had, however, convinced him. he had misunderstood .him. lie trusted under all the circumstances; the Hop. Member would withdraw his motion. 14r. S. WORTLEY wished to know whether, if he withdrew his - motion, it was to be considered as an acknowledgrn2nt that the paragraph was dicapproved.—(NO, no ! Question, question !) Mr. liEral.tx put it to:the Hon. Member for TOrksliire;, whether he would persevere-in a mo tion, against the sense.of the House, because two or thi.ee individuals refused to accede to a pro positiol. he miglt malce.- 7 —The gallery was then cleared for a division—, } or ailjourrisiig Agnirist it 155 hlj;)rity the A mendm.• tit .. 1I I Whilst strangers were.excluded, Mr. 14.1:40T0N moved the previous question. • Mr. fir.74Ni.7 was anxious that the tine of.the should not be wasted.. 1.3. q H t the on. Ge ntleman was off en d e d even by a cheer ; and was . induced Co make a different motion . from what he at first ii,tended. Mr. b. WonTLEy said ? the . Halve must be sensible of the con.ciiiatory speech of the Hon. GenliPthati. He, (Mr. W.) stood on the privi leges of the Huuse, which was. denied by .some G ., mtlernau.—(No, no !)—lf an infringment was ad:nit ted, he would withdraw the motion. Lord CASTLREA.GII thought, some misconcep tion prevailed, as no vindictive step was meant to be taken. The question was, if it was such a breach of privilege, as called for the appearance df the indii , idual at the Bar. lie thought •no one could doubt that there was a breach of privilege ; but it was a question, whether it was such a one as pilled - for. the interference of the House. lie hoped the 'previous qUestiou would be with drawn. Lord A. HAMILTON said,: that .the subject had been purSued in the most. injudicious:manner, as . the usual course was to move ffat the individual had been guilty of a breach of privilege. The motion had not been made on account of the cri minality of the man, but because•the Mover was not pleased with the condUct . of some five.or six of his oppoents. The Noble Lord (Castle reagh) had set a becoming example of modera tion ; and he hoped the Delover;would be. kft in a minority. .No ground had been • stated far the 'nation ; he felt confident that.the Noble Lord, and those who acted with him, would vo t e aga i ns t it._ He denied that th e latter part of the article was a criminal libel on the. House, though it might be disrespectful to the Noble Lord. Mr. S. WonTLry would submit to the Chair the propriety of the course he had taken. e SPEAKER stated ; that as many cases had occurred where, in the first instance, the inGivi duv I had been called to the bar, as when the Hoese had come to a previous vote on the ques tion of libel. Dr. LUSIIINGTON had no doubt that the article was a breach of the privileges of the House, and as that was the general feeling on his side, he hoped the motion would be withdrawn. Mr. S. WoitTLEY, after what he "had heard would withdraw his motion. Mr. la IMBTON said, that he would also with. draw Hs motion, from a wish to save the time o the House. Mt.. S. WartTLy.y would leave it to the country to judge betuifi“ hint anti the lion. Gentlemen opposite. The Amendment of Mr. LAMETON was then withdrawn; and Mr. 5.11 , ' ORTLEY also withdrew his Motion. ARMY MEDICAL EXPENCES, Lord PALMERSTON presented papers connected with the Medical Expences of the Ariny.---Laid on the table. COUNTY COURTS' BILL Lord ALTIIORP postponed the — secohd reading of the County Courts' Bill, which stood for this day, to Thursday next, 15th inst. GRANIPOUND DISFRANCIFISENIENT. Mr. STUART WoitTLLY postponed to Tuesday next, the further consideration of the Gratnpound Disfranchisement Bill. BANK CAM-1 PAYMENTS. The• CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER stated, that on Monday . he should more that the House should, resolve itself into a Committee O'n the subject .or Cash Paymt , hts. Mr: 13.k_RISO hoped that the Right Hon. Gen tleman would state what he Meant to propose to the House, and also that he would postpone the Committee to a future day, The CHANCELLOR of the Excuvaurrt said, that his object was to accelerate by a year payment in cash, and also to make the exte4t of 51. instead. of 21. a legal tender in silver.: Mr. BARING said, as the question was one of the greatest possible importance, he should move as an amenjrnent, to send it to a Cominittee above stairs. After some further observations, on' the part of the CIIINCELLOII of the •EXCHEQUER arid Mr. BARING, the Committee was posti)oned . to Mon. day se'nnight. CORN AVERAGES. Lord C.HTLEatAon moved for Copies 9f any recent Accounts received from any of his Majes ty's Ambassadors at Foreign Courts, of the prices of Corn in tho(:e countries. Sir JOHN NEWPORT moved that there be laid - before the House an Account of all sums of money paid by the Commissioners of Excise in Ireland, for seven years last past, for Stamps and Law Proceedings.—Ordered. TIMES LEASING BILL. Sir G. HILL begged the Hon. Baronet, Mem ber for the Queen's County, would postpone the second reactinz.of - the Tithes Leasing Bill, which, stood for this day. Sir H. PARNELL consented. Second reading postponed to Wednesday next. FOREIGN TRADE. Mr. WALLAEE brought up the Report of the Committee on Foreign Trade, and stated, that on an early day he should call the attention of the House to the subject.—The Report was laid on the table, and ordered to be printed. PE I'MON FROM ILCHEsTER GAOL. Mr. Alderman Woof) presented a Petition from a person of the name of Charles Hill, con fined in Ilchester Gaol, for the space of 15 years, and then 74 years of age. The man had been a Collector of Taxes, and a deficiency had taken place to the amount of 7191.; but effects of his had been sold to the amount of 4671., and taxes had -been collected to the value of 2.171.; so that the actual deficiency was only the amount of. thirty-four pounds. To make up that deficiency, tire petitioner had offered all his property, and had petitioned the Treasury, the Commissioners of Taxes, and Parliament. After the Petition to Parliament, the Gaoler had open. ed Jfis boxes and taken away all his papers, and removed him to the common side of the gaol. Many, complaints had been made of the conduct Of the, Gaoler ; but all that lie (.old. Wood) wanted was, the release of the individual, parti cularly as other defaulters, to a much greater amount, bad been overlooked. Mr. Hunt, who had formerly been treated with great indulgence by the late Sheriff, had latterly experienced a great alteration in his treatment. He (Aid. W.) intended soon to move fur a Commttee to inquire into the state of the gaol: _ _ M. CREEVEY thought -as the sum for which the Petitioner was confined was so small, the case must have escaped 'the notice of Ministers. Mr. VillierS had been a defaulter to the amount of 100,0001:and-there should be but one law to the rich and .poor. • The CHANCELLOR of the EXCUEQUER said, that in this case , the Treasury had no power to inter fere. The case lay between the individual and the- parish. Mr. DICKENiON thought the sum was greater than 31/. The individual might have formerly been liberated had he consented to give up a certain property. He understood that he acted as an Attorney in- the gaol, and remained there from his- own inclination. Ile was ready to meet the Hon. Member in the Committee he intended to move. He had heard that the Worthy Alder man had made a Report on the State of the Gaol from a printed book, and that he had never en tered the walls. Sir T. LETalittlndE courted inquiry into the management of the Gaol, and defended the con duct of the Magistrates. Dr. LCsIUNtrroN said, as Member for Ilchester, he had been asked to support the Petition. Much of the Petition was true, but the facts, if examined, would assume a different face. The Petitioner had been confined for a much larger snm than had been staled, and would Crave been released had he chosen to execute a certain deed. That he. had at first refused, but, four years ago, he. had ex pressed a willingness to do so. The sum at stake betwixt him and the parish was 701. 'Though the Magistrates were unable to do all they wished, much had been.done within the last 15 years. The Gaoler had been found a valu able man in the hands of the 'Magistrates. Sir I. COFFIN bore testimony to the good con duct of the Gaoler. After a few words from Sir F. OMMANEY, the Petition was brought up, and read. Alderman Wool) stated, that since his Petition to Parliament the Petitioner had been unable to act as au Attorney, as all his papers had been taken away. He had made no report from a printed book, but from actual inspection of the prison. He had heard that a person, upon a charge of fraud, (he meant Kinneir) lived in the house of the gaoler.. He would refer to the book of Visiting Magistrates to prove that he had examined the gaol. Mr. - BmttNa stated, that he had been informed upon -the most respectable authority, that the Gentle Men sent by the City of London to ex amine the gaol, had ordered a dinner, which had lasted so long that they had no time to visit the gaol ; and the statement they had made refer red to the former state of the prison, which had been completely altered a - year before.—(Loud Laughter.) Mr. BENNET said that a hearsay tale was not to be opposed to the testimony of the Worthy Alderman himself: Mr. F. BURTON had been informed that the Worthy Alderman and his party had not been within the, walls of the gaol. He (MT. B.) had experienced much pleasure from the conduct of the gaoler. Alderman Noon stet(' that he and Sir J. Perring, then a Member of the House, and the Town-Clerk, had been two hours within the prison. There.haA"been no dinner in the place. Mr. C. Ilt:Tc - nriiwNt thought the Worthy Al der Man hadnot'been fairly dealt with, and felt much regret at what had taken place. Mr. BARING said, that as the Worthy Alder man had said he had been within the walls of the prisoi., he must suppose he had been misinform ed. But the account of the state of the prison referred to what it had formerly been. Dr. LUSHINGTON wished to know if the Chan- cellor of the Exchequer would consent to the re lease of the prisoner. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER must be guided by an examination of the facts of the case. CONINIFI"I'EE 4)F SUPPLY. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the Order of the Day for the House resolving it self into a Committee of Supply. Mr. CR EEVEY must oppose the motion. Nu merous Petitions had been presented to that House, complaining of distress, and yet the only two motions, with that of the Member for Abing don (Moberly) and the Member for Cumber land (Curwen), with a view to alleviate that distress, had been negatived by the House. There were 70 Members of that House who had 150,0001. a year among them. There were 70 Distributors of Stamps of England and Wales, and 70 Collectors of the Land Tax, all given to the relations and dependents of that House. There were also many other sources of influence in the Customs and the Excise ; nor could he shut his eyes to India, the Colonies, and even the Estimates on the table of the House. He should move, as an amendment, that the House should - take into consideration the circumstance of Members of that House holding Offices under the Crown, and that to the amount of 150,0001., and should move a Resolution, that an Independent House of Counnons was essential to the redress of the grievanc,es of the people. Lord PALMERSTON thought that the lion. GPn tleman had made" this motion to obstruct the whole march and machinery of the Government. The House would consider that the Mutiny Act expired on the 24th of this month ; and unless the number of men were voted the Mutiny 131 must be stopped. He considered this as a recor of the Hon. Gentleman's opinion, which he held 11 years ago, of the necessity of Parliamentary Reform. Colonel Davies wished to know whether the Hon. Member intended his motion for a bar to the grant in supply altogether. Mr. CitEEVEY said,he should divide the House 011_the subject. Mr. BENNET assented to the proposition of his Hon. Friend ; but he hoped that he would bring in this motion on every occasion when supplies were to be granted. Mr. CA r,crt.t FT could not assent to this motion ; for hostile as he was to the present Administra tion, he could not consent to clog the:wheels or Government, for he kuew the Mutiny Bill must be renewed. Still he could not agree with the Noble Lord opposite (Palmerston), that the Mutiny Bill must soon expire ; for he might pass a short Mutiny Bill till the first of May, and then the Mutiny Bill might be renewed every. lstof May.—Mr. Cueuvuk explained. After a few words from Sir J. NcWPORT, Mr. HUSKISSON,. and Mr. Moxcx, the House di vided F,,r the Amendment Si Against it !Majority -1.44 The SPEAKER then put the question, 6 That Le should leave the Chair." Mr. HumE did not rise to oppose the business of the House needlessly ; but he meant to sub mit a motion that the Military Eitablishment of the country was too great; and therefore he was induced to recom-nend economy on this the first of the regular Estimates. The Chancellor of the Exchequer had said that the Estimates of this year would be a million less than last year ; but the House would find that the expences of the Army and Navy exceeded those of 1819 by above a million, and were only less by 300,0001. than those of last year. He complained that the E,timates of the Army were not fairly stated to the House. He entered into the usual compari sons between the Military Establishments in Great Britain, Ireland, and the Colonies in 1791., - and those 'of the present day ; the result of which was, that we had now 20,000 Men more than we had in the year 1792. He therefore would call upon the HouAe to rednce the regular troops by 10,000 men •; for he did not wish that so large an Esta i blishment should he reduced all at once.— ,s would leave to the Noble Lord a surplus of 10,000 mrn; for the.new Colonies and other pur poses. The House will be surprised to find that we had 125,000 men in arms, or ready to be called out in a few hours. He appealed to the Agricultural Members whether they would not do more good - to the country by reducing the mi litary establishment,.and by consequently ing the taxes, than by increasing their own rents, which it.was in vain for them to deny as being their object. If they did not do so they would feel their pockets still lighter before the year was out. He contended that there was an ex cessive number of llousehold troops kept up by Ministers for the mere purposes of parade and show. It was the duty of the House to oblige Ministers to look how they could make these troops become of less expence to the country. We had got, he would contend, an overgrown military establishment in Arne r;ca ; and a still greater establishment in the Staff. When they looked at the 14001. .12001., 800/., and 600/. a year to clerks in the War-Office, would any man say that-we could continue in that unnatural state of things, which was occasioned by the War Taking every thing into consideration, there would be seven millions for the army, exclusive of the Half-pay and Pension list, when in 1792 it only cost two or three millions at th e utmost. He thought the House had a right to complain that time Noble Lord had not proposed a reduction of the num ber of regiments from 92 to 72. He should op pose the expence of the Staff and other Corps, especially the Ordnance Department. At the same time he .believed that the duty at the Horse Guards, as far as he knew, was much better done than that of any other Department under Government. But it was their duty to stop every species of extravagance in every branch of the State. lie complained that our colonies of the Cape of Good Hope, and the Mauritius, and Cey lon, were taxed without their own Represen tatives having any share in voting a way their own money. The only one of these colonies that had received any boon was Ceylon, which had re ceived the Trial by Jury—a circumstance which had given the greatest satisfaction to all classes in the Island. If those colonies received Bri tish laws, they would cheerfully provide for their own military establishments. The House might perhaps be surprised that pay and clothing for the stations abroad, amounted to 1,018,0001. As he was credibly informed, almost the whole of these Colonies supported _themselves before they came under our Government; and this was only altered by our sending out a set of men to till sinecure offices. We had ruined and spoiled every thing by giving away idle and use less places. Until all thew branches of econo my and retrenchment were attended to, it would be impossible for this country to prosper. The Hon. Member then proceeded to a review of the expenditure of the office of Secretary , at War. Ile intended nothing personal to the Noble Lord, who he dared say was no worse than others; but it should be recollected, that in 1796 the whole expence of the Office of Secre tary, wasB2sol. now it was upwards of 60,0001. and at the commencement of the war the ex pencez of the War-Office was 8,0001. only, now it was 61,0001.; after further observations the Hon. Member said he tyoutd not now detain the House, but would refrain going into detail till the House went into the Committee. He con cluded by moving a resolution in substance as fol lows : , ----Resolyed,that in 1792, the military force of the Empire was only 48,474, whilst in 1821 it was 81,106, and that in the opinion of the House it ought to be reduced. Sir H. WILSON seconded the motion. He strongly condemned the conduct adopted in the management of our Colonies. He particularly alluded to the Cape of Good Hope; he was there at the time we took possession of that Colony, which, previous to our taking possession of it, supported itself without being any expence to the Mother Country. As soon as we took pos session the case was altered, and the Colony be came and had continued ever since a heavy ex pellee to the country ; he was convinced that an immense saving might be made in the manage ment of the Colonies. The Resolution was then put and negatived, and the.question for the Speaker leaving the Chair was adopted. Mr. Humc said, he bad two or three Resolu tions to propose. The SPEAKER said, this could not be done re gularly now, as the sense of the House had been taken on his leaving the Chair. Mr. liumE had entirely mistaken the course, he had three Resolutions, and had intended to suirt-r the two first to he negatived, intending to take the sense of the House on the third, and thus get them all entered on the J ournals. The SPEAKER said, this might be . done on the Report being brought up, but not on the Com mittee. Nothing which passed in the Committee would get on the Journals. Mr. TIERNEY submitted the impropriety of going into the Army Estimates at this rate hour. Ile ►r:is aware the Mutiny Bill pressed ; but he was ready to lend his aid to any step which - would get rid of that difficulty. Lord PALMERSTONE thought the House might go into the Committee, and take the argument un the Report. Air. P. GRANT and Mr. DAMES opposed go ing into the Committee at this late hour. Mr. M. A, TAYLOR, Oil the part of the Public, must protest against the House going into this im portant discussion at so late an hour, and would therefore move that the House do now adjourn. The HOuse was accordingly proceeding to di vide, when Lord CASTLEREAGH, although , he considered the House would have come better prepared to discuss the subject on Monday, if they had gone into the Cotntnittee, and heard the detail to night ; yet at (Iris late hour, well aware of the reluctance which Gentlemen would have ta,go into discussion, he considered it would be better to adjourn to Monday. After some further conversation, as to the order of proceeding, between the Speaker, Lord Castle reagh, end. Mr. A. Taylor, the latter withdrew his motion, and the Committee was fixed for Aionday. The Irish Treason Bill,. brought from the Lords, ‘s:as read a first, and ordered to be read a second time on the 22d instant. The other Orders were disposed of, and the. House adjourned at Half-past Twelve to Monday. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT or' KINU'S BENCH, MARCH 9. 110DGiON V. WA Unlit. This trial, which has excited an unusual de gree of interest among the News-venders of the Metropolis, came on this morning before Lord Chief Justice Annovr. Sir J. COPLEY and Mr. GUI:NEY appeared for the plaintiff, and Messrs. SCARLETT arid DENMAN for the defendant. It was an action for an assty.ned libel, and injury sustained by the plaintiff, -in the pro ecution of his occupation as a caws-Vender. The damages were laid at 10001. The circumstances or the case, as they appeared in evidence, were:— Mr. Hodgson, it appsars, is a News-vender at the west end of the town, and from the distance of his connexions from The "thee, was some time in J une last induced to remon strate with the Publisher of The Times Paper upon what he consitkred an unfair priorit;., of the distribution of that Journal ; out orthis re monstrance some unpleasant feeling arose against Mr. Hodgson, an d th e P ropr i etor of tire Paper thought proper to insert a paragraph in !fs- Journal, reflecting on the character of the tiff, and indirectly advising his customers to ob tain their Papers of some other per-:on, as the Proprietor of The Times stated he was deter mined not to let the plaintiff have any from his office. To obtain reparation for this injury the plaintiff brought this action. Sir J. Coe.t.F.y and Mr. GuItNEY addressed the Court at very considerabl e length, upon the dangerous tendency and malicious motives of the defendant, who had used the powerful ineana their Journal gave them to circulate an injurious impression against the plaintiff. Several witnesses were called, who spoke to the altercations between the plaintiff and the publisher, and to the general demeanour of the plaintiff ; none of them, however, proved any damage sustained by him in consequ,aice of the offensive paragraph in question. Mr. SCARIETT and Mr. DENmAn made a very brilliant reply generally, contending, that as the plaintiff had failed to establish the damages al leged in his declaration, they were entitled to verdict. The CHIEF JUSTICE made a very impartial summing up; and the Jury, afterar little consi deration, gave a verdict for the plaintiff—Da wages 501. costs 40s. FIRE IN SURINAM: FURTII rt PARTICULAR ,Fe4o. I am very sorry to inform you, that oo the 21st of this month, an alarming tire broke-opt in the beautiful town of Paramaribo, which has.de stroyed more than two-thirds of the same. - the inhabitants of this place are accustomed to live in more than common luxury, tL loss will turn out to be of a serious description.—llie whole of the stores, together with all the -provi sions, are burn t, and the inhabitants thrown into the greatest possible distress. We are obliged to send .frorp the different plantations_ as many plaintuins as we can spare ; this is a - hind! of fruit which the Negroes make use of instead of bread, and which now the most opulent are thankful to procure. In the confusion of the fire, very few persons saved even their papers, and this once delightful town is laid in ruins, only here and there the beam of a house standing : the inhabitants will have no alternative but to retire to the plantations for shelter. In my next f will send you more par ticulars how this happened. All whom I have seen say the inhabitants are in a distracted state. The foundation stone of the New Market Building in Taunton, was laid Wednesday ' se'iinight. The ceremony of laying the corner sump was performed by C.K.K. Tynte, Esq. M. P. Provincial Grand Master of Somerset, attended hy a large body 'of Freemasons, the Bailiffs of the borough, the Clergy,. Magistrates, and many of the respectable gentlemen of the WWII and neigh bOurhriod.—The masonic procession, attended with Hags and mniic, kft the London Inn at "I=2, o'clock, and having "proceeded to the spot, the Prov:ncial Grand Mager dclivercd a benedictory• addre.is on the occasion, which was received with great applause, as was also a speech of Si ' inilar import, by th-. Reverend Mr. Poivms, Provincial Grand Chaplain.- The stone hav ing been lowered with the usual - ceremonies, the procession returned-to the London Inn; where a dinner table, excellently supplied, was served up by Mr. Wiwi:: to a large company of the masonic brotherhood, who, under the Pre.4dency of their worthy Grand - Master, eujoYi4 a * l `"' lighten! social evening. BIRI - Hg. flu Thursday. at his house, ' iu 13ernatd•s4reet, the La le' of Nash C. Hiniatd, EsiJ. of a,sutt. Yesterday, at. her Yattmr's htttote, in Upper GOVI'VV•Stree. the Lady of Lientettatit Coluttel - L%auce, 2d Lite Guards, of a daughter. MARRIED. On Thitr.clay, at Cheltenham. IVilliarn Te!shy :Jones, E. Gwarryn, Cardig,in , bire, to• Jane, elgest doughter of 00 late Henry Ticbell, Ef,44..! L011(1(111. 011 TITCSdaV last, bpthe Very Rev. Dean of -refurcl, George Harrington, 1 4 ;sq. to Miss Hilt , of the ia,"l pince. DIF:D. Yesterday. at the Ottice. Mrs. Juliana Forest, hoLI keeper to that Department for upw ds of 40 years. On 'Phillsday last, IJary Sophia, wife of hotuas 6 , ) 1 :, Esq. of Mansion Huse-tdrect. On the morning of the 11, ult. at his resitlencltt Par k ' house, C h elsea, Alex. S'tephe , s, Esq. aged 64 years. Yesterday, at his house, in Chili La in Place, IL Winstanley, ,Esq. in the 691 ti year of his age, house -t.sloolir street, Bath, W. Aio'erson, F4(l._ Lf.)NDON : Printed by J. 13. CA R STAI HS, of No. 29, .Great Otniond-street, Q uceii . ; :quare_ ,41-14.4; zind published by NV. A. SCRI2PS, of No. 7, south.olt3::-. at THE 6 . 144 Orr :c^, No. 112, Strand ; where ADVERTISE ,NIE2•!! Oii.DERS 7 LKTTERS, Si,Z. (post-raid)ritlst !; 4:4.44.444