The Sun. — London, England, 1821-02-28 00:00:00

; per, he was unable,' In the absence of his ICglrf Uon. Friend, to answer that question. Mr. Cunw EN expressed a hope, that if the - plan :reposed for fabricating an iuirnitable Bank-note h;4l2.ltogetber failed ; some better plan would be discovered, or at least, that no possible means would be - remitted to . make Bach a desirable dis- cevery. Mr. R. WARD said, that he had made-some in quiries upon this - subject, and was sorry to learn, that the result of - what htd yet been done did Dot prove satisfactory.. But there were still se era' ,plans for the manufacture of notes ; and although the plan which it was hoped would be spite successful had been found to fail, there was 'till no feeling of despair that an effectual plan wouid.yet he discovered. Now pending the in quiry and exertion which were making to make cut this discovery; -he must say, that he' thought it extremely inexpedient to bring forward casual conversations uron the subject in that House, as such conversations were but too likely to produce : public inconvenience . , if not public alarm. Dlr. BEN:vvr declared, that the result of the iuquiries Which he had made upon this subject was quite .contrary to that of the Hon. rdember who had just sat down, as he found that a corn - plete de-Tair did prevail as to the practicability (.1 manufacturing an inimitable Bank-note.-- lien:e if Cat.h Fayments were not resumed, the . . .continue to possess the . power • t dispensing lifie , snd death in case of forgery. —• Mr. D. GIIAERT : said, that he, with - . other - Members of the Commission for investigating this •,übject, attended at the Bank about three weeks ago, 'in order.to witness an examination of the I;ian deemed most likely. to succeed in produciag as inimitable note. Some deficiencies in that Ilan were pointed out by the Agents of the and the author undertook to supply them. by making the additions required. 'Therefore s confident expectation..was.-entertained that the motes - So•much deFired Would be ready for circu it:ion by the payment of the Midsummer Divi- C.Lnds. He had himself, indeed, seen the author -cll the plan referred to the other day, and that .Gentleown told him that he was going on- with the improvements suggested at the Bank with every prospect of success. Where then was the .reason for such despondency as had been ex pressed - upon the other side of the House ? CUaw EN said, that he could not • admit ''.hat it was reasonable to object to a request for information upon - s subject of this nature, such !Iformation being so very interesting to the co•antry. • WARD,- after what bad been stated by )Us,.. Hon. Friend behind him (Mr. Gilbert), re ferred to the House as to the justice of his obser ▪ aticon. . . .The Hon. 11. BENNET, in justification of his rc marks, referred to facts. Mr. CALCRAFT felt himself called upon to state, notwithstanding the denunciation of the Ron. Secretary for the Ordnance against any agitation of this subject, that he but yesterday learned from the best authority, that the project for manufacturing inimitable notes had totally failed, and this information he . was •of course mOre disposed to rely upon than the statement of the Honourable Member for Bodmin, who, ac cording; to his own observation, had not had any ‘orthnunication with the Bank for the last three weeks. The Bank then having failed to procure t' - lef invention and manufacture of such notes as !night render forgery difficult, •if not impractica bie, it was intended, he was authorised to say, on his side of , the House (should Ministers not bring forward such a measure;) to submit a pro position to the House, calling upon the Bank to withdraw its one and two pound notes from cir culation,.and to issue cash in lieu thereof. Upon the motion of Mr. BARING being put, 2.fr. Gut FELL rose to ask his Hon. - Friend, for the satisfaction of the House and the Public; to offer some explanation as to what he had said he understood to be the intended proposition of the Chancellor of the Exchequer with respect to the Bank ? BVIING said, his undorstanlling was, that the -Chancellor of the Exchequer intended to bring forward, in a day or two, a proposition for cmpowering tine Bank to issue cash on the Ist of Niy next, as a part. : of the circulation of the conntry in concurrence with its notes. The se vurftl returns moved were ordered. WEST INDIA DO( K. Mr. MARRYAT, after animadverting upon the excessive duesdemanded by the West India Dock Company,- stated, that a numerous and most re spectable Meeting of the Merchants and Traders of London took place some• time ago, to consider this subject, in pursuance of public advertise ment. A t that Meeting a Resolution was agreed to without a dissenting voice, expressive of the strongest disapprobation of the exactions of this Company,, and a Petition to that House was agreed to unanimously, praying for redress.— This Petition he had now_the honour to present, which he did with the more satisfaction, as he entirely concurred'in the sentiments which it con tahled. The lion. Member contrasted the con duct of Cie IVi , st India Docks Ivith. that of the TVL , rcantile Docks in France. and Flanders, where, no-exactions were tolerated, and concluded with ekpressing- a hope that the complaints of the Pe iiti,Aers would be duly considered by the House. Sir Is.tic COFFIN- observed, that there never appeared to be much friendship in trade. -Each •trierchant sought his OWTI interest, monoply was tlie.order,of the day amongst them, and beggar my neighbour the object.—(A laugh.) Air. F. LEWIS considered it fortunate that the charters for the Docks near London were fora limited term, as they must therefore necessarily be brought before the House. At Hull .a per • manent charter had been granted, and although they Shareholders had been receiving 50 per cent. on their shares, the shipping and merchandise was saddled with the same charges, instead of the rates being reduced, after allowing a fair remuneration to the proprietors. Ile then re marked• upon the accession of monopoly gained ley . the East India Dock Company, who, by a clause in their charter, engrossed the whole. of - the East India private—trade._ He Ahought that it would be very advantageous if the Docks were compelled to lay an account before Pazl:ament annitally. ll.e hoped when the donsidetidioti of these.charters would conic under •notice of the Housei. - ,that a pritwiple ut fair competition . •- Mr. F. ItotussoN said, he, was very far from undervaluing the importance of this question. Ii was undoubtedly the duty of that House to watch with peculiar vigilance the tendency of any niece sure which involved private! interests as well as the great commercial interests of the country.-- There were other Docks, beside the West India Decks, *hich •had exclusive charters, having a longer period to rtin than the West India ; it would have been inexpedient, therefore, to make any declaration of the views of Government as to the renewal of the charter of the West India "Company,- until the whole question, as it re spected those several charters, had been taken into consideration. Mr, BArtixo said, the question before the House was one which was .intimately connected with the economy of trade in this country. It was a fact which no merchant would deny, that the establishment of these Dock Companies, though it was at first a sort. of experiment, had proved of the greatest public utility. When they were first established,rit was impossible to know lhow far the rates .would or would not afford a sufficient compensation for the capital employed ; but now that it had ',been .ascertained that the rates 'had greatly :exceeded such a com pensation, it was certainly an important ques tion for Parliament to determine, whether the Charters should be renewed. He thought the House o u ght not. to . decide hastily .upon a question ofsuch magnitude, which involved the private interests of a large body of proprie tors, as well as ; the. general economy of trade. The Charter . was granted to the West India Company, witha restriction thatthey were never to divide more than 10 per cent. The obvious inference was, tlial if the rates exceeded such a sum as would afford R - dividenA of 10 per cent. they were bound to reduce them so as to bring the dividend. within thevrescribed limits. They had, however, clone no such thing. Instead of reducin! , the rates, they had 'accumulated a sum of no less' than 500,0001.' It was sufficiently clea:', that prudent men would not incur the re sponsibility of dividing so large a sum among the stockholders, and he .(11r. Baring) felt per suaded that such a division without the sanction of an Act of Parliament would be quite illegal. Mr. F. ItOBINSO,N explained. Mr. C. Loma observed, that with regard to the protection of the Revenue, , these Docks had perfectly answered the purposes of their esta bliAment. The. Revenue had also been col lected at a much less expence within the Docks than in any other department. After a words from Mr. Alderman lIEYGATE, the Petition was brought up. Upon the question for reading the Petition, _ _ Mr. - MARRY.IT said, he hop;:d that when any legislative measure came before the House, in volving the interests of the West India Dock .Company, Parliament would take into its consi deration the benefits which had accrued to the Country from that Establishment. Mr. GORDON - said, he understood, that a large offer had been made to Government for their in tervention on behalf of the proprietors. Mr. F.•ltontNsos said, he had never heard of any such offer having been. made. As. to any be nefit which the proprietors were themselves like ly to derive from the accumulated Stock, he thought this was a very doubtful question, for he understood their affairs were in Chancery. The petition was then read, and ordered to be printed. lANE.N TRADF,. Mr. HumE wished to ask the Right Hon. Gen tleman oppo,ite (Mr. F. Robinson), whether it was his intention to propose any measure to the House with respect to the bounties upon the ex portation of English and Scotch linen ? Mr. F. RontssoN said, the Hon. Gentleman must be aware that the existing law would not expire until July 1823, therefore no intention had been formed on the subject; but there was a similar bounty allowed on linens exported from Ireland, and as long as the bounty was conti nued in Ireland, he should conceive it to be no more than proper that it should be so continued in other parts of the Kingdom. Mr. MABEKLY wished that this policy should be authorised by Parliament. The word of the Right Hon. Gentleman would, no doubt, be binding on himself, but it was not an Act of Par- liament, and the Right Hon. Gentleman's succes sor might adopt another line of policy, notwith standing his assurance. Mr. F. ROBINSON said, he was fully aware of the difference between his word and an Act of Parliament. He had not intended any thing fur ther than to answer the question which an Hon. Member had put to him. Mr. MAIIERLY wished to ask the Hunourable the SeCretary of the Treasury, why certain ac counts relating to the arrears of the Consolidated Fund in Ireland, which he had moved for some time back, had not been produced? He was the more surprized at the delay, because one of the accounts to which he referred was ordered by the House to be made within fifteen days of the sth January every year. Mr. LusnINGTON said, ; that, every po3sible exertion had been made by the Treasury here to procure the accounts alluded to, and the only difficulty had arisen from the form of the Honourable Member's motion, which might even now be removed, if he chose to amend his motion. If he had moved for the accounts up to the sth January only, they would now have been here, but he had extended ii to the aOth January, and therefore it had been im possible to procure them sooner. Dr. LUSIIINGTON postponed, from Thursday to Friday next, his motion relative to Mr. Ellis's re moval from the office of Master in Chancery in Ireland. Mr, Hymn moved for accounts of the expendi ture in the Colonial Establishments at the island of Maritius, Ceylon, Cape of Good Hope, Esse quibo, Demerara, and Berbice, which were or dered ; as were also several accounts relating to the sums of money under each head '61 4 the Army Estimates for 18'20. CAMS AVF.RIC;Eq The Report of the Committee on the Con A verage Acts was brought up and read, and leave given to bring in a Bill to alter the same. The House then went inti;a ConnateP on the Transportation of Offenders Lill, the several clauses of which were agreed to, and the Report ordered to be,presented to-►norrow. ' The other orders of the day were then dis;- posed of, and the House adjourned at half-past even o'clock. ~rjlE DoN J o - uilry ALS. [DAILY EXTRACTS FROM THE MORNING PAPERS. , Piornhzg Post.] Notwithstanding - the : hostile complexion of affairs. in Italy, advices from Frankfort of the latest date hold out a hope that war may yet be avoided ; but the !grounds of this expectation are too vaguely stated t - ti be entitled to much credit. Whatever may be the event, we continue firmly persuaded, that grave as the ! question is, the British Government have justly considered it as not forming a sulliCient ground upon which .to abandon trie pacific policy they haVe so pru dently and so wisely adopted. In refusing, how ever, to embroil the country in a war for an ob ject not immediately affecting its security, they have not - hesitated to vindicate the great prin ciples of international law; without regarding whether the interpretation would favour this! or that party' in the dispute, they have dis tinctly condemned the principle that one pow e r! has a right, except in very extraordinary cir rumstances, to interfere in the domestic concerns of another ; and they have, with the same can dour, expressed their disapprobation _of the man ! Her in which the Revolution in Naples was effected. It is a just subject of regret that any pretext has arisen for disturbing the peace of the Continent. If Austria could by any means- but those of force prevent the example of Naples • from spreading over t:te rest of Italy, she wou!d deserve every calamity which discomfiture can bring in its train for having neglected them. If she even attempted, upon any other principle than that of manifest danger to her own posses, sions, to march an army against Naples, she would merit the strongest censures. [New Times.] The accounts contained in the French Papers, relative to the march of the Austrian troops, lead -to the general inference, that sni7h a force will advance from Naples as to render resistance hopeless. The troops march in three divisions, of which one proceeds by Ancona, and the two othiTS will unite at Rome. The latter point, therefore, is that to which our chief attention is to be directed. We have little - idea that any thing like a great battle will take place, but if it does at all, it will probably he in this direction. However, it is much more likely that the Rebels will not drive matters to an extremity which may render them amenable to the justice of the laws, or the still speedier !justice of those whom they have led into danger. The ad vanced guard of the Austrians entered Flo, rence on the 11th inst. Sonic Neapolitans it is said on the other hand have entered the, Roman 4 ' States : and The Times exultingly tells us that '' the whole revolutionary spirit of the Roman people will be roused and encouraged by this de, • cided movement." IVe waisted not this proof of the revolutionary spirit of The Times ; but the radical Journalist will be disappointed. Rome itself is not a military post of any importance, and even if Carascosa and his banditti,should get thither, it would neither postpone their ultimate - defeat, nor encourage the Romans to rise in in surrection. [British Press.] Some of our Treasury Writers have the hardi hood to say, that the Manifesto of the Austrian Government " makes out a case " to justify the measures pursued by the Allied Powers. There are very few persons in this Country, we are firmly persuaded, or perhaps in Europe, not-im mediately interested in the maintenance of old abuses, who think so. Even the British Minis ters, although they somewhat too plainly shewed the disgraceful toils which they have suffered the despotic Governments of the Continent to en twine around 'them, were too conscious of the tendency of public opinion in England upon the invasion of Naples, to hazard one expression in Parliament - beyond a strict and formal defence of their system of neutrality. On every side of the House of Commons was the aggression on the part of the Allies condemned, so that the majority that voted on the side of Ministers upon the question for the pro duction of certain documents, did not by any means justify the conduct of Austria. With re spect to this Austrian Declaration, it is in itself contemptible in point of composition and reason ing, it is fraught with erroneous statements_and inconclusive arguments ; but the Emperor" of AUSTRIA. lately told the Professors of the Ly ceum at Laybach, that he wanted not learned m'en within . his territories, he was not to be served by the pen but with the sword, and this Manifes to was written with this feeling, that if any . part of it required explanation, the commentary was to be supplied by an army of 100,000 men. It would be an easy task to point out the fallacies .- and absurdities of this precious document ; hut we feet with the Philoso ' pher of old, who declined to press an advantage which he had obtained in some intellectual con flict with an Emperor of Rome, that it is useless to argue with one who has the command of thirty - legions." Austria tells Naples that if sine yields not to such arguments inn the first instance, Rus sia and Prussia will unite to convince her that the Allies alone are able and willing to ensure the happiness of her people. We know of na argu ment that can be urged against this species of logic but brave hearts and strong arms, and if the accounts from Naples prove true, the Neapo litans are not indifferently prepared for the dis putation. [Mortibig Ghronicle.l The forgeries and executions ; , and the pdions principle of selection for pu2islunent, among per- I sons equally criminal, fOrtii such a blot upon the administration ofjustice—such a tnoral reproach Lto the country—such a source of weakness to the laws, and of corruption to the .populatidn, that they must at any expellee. be ptit an end to. If the Bank cannot issue better notes than the pre sent-ones, let them issue none of the lot er de nominatiots. In this wish, we are sure the whole of the people will concur. If therd were any inconvenience in the introduction of a me tallic circulation, it would be, cheerfully borne to extirpate a great root of crime and misery.— But the fact is, that the calling in of the one. and two pound notes, while it would almost root out forgery, would scarcely affect mercantile trans actions. [The Times.] This evening Mr. Plunkett wakes leis motion upon one of those questions Of whith it is difficult to treat, on account of its extreme.magnitude.— ' It is impossible' to say all that .has reference to the subject, and a decision formed upon selected topics, detached considerations, and insulated remarks, is both unworthy of the question, and is also-likely to be erroneous. is-proper there fore that those who would come to a just conclu sion, should. supply the defects of human oratory by the more active powers - of their own minds . ; an'l, charging themselves first, with the rejection of every selfish view, and the relinquishment of every prejudice, let them think over the subject with the most •exact and minute attention, and adopt that conclusion whict in their consciences they believe likely to prove most beneficial to their country. [Horning herald.] . After all the promises of the Bank of England, the encouragement held out to ingenious artists, the deliberations of assembled men of science, and eager' hopes of the humane public, it now appears that the idea of rendering Bank forgeries ' more difficult has been abandoned. It was as serted last -night in the House of - Commons by several Members, among others, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Clime'', and Mr. Calcraft, that they were well informed that - the very hope of any plan had been disavowed. To this there was no contra diction. Mr. D. Gilbert merely stated that when he last communicated with the Bank, the plan proposed by the Committee had not then been given up. This plan, though at first feasible, had failed upon experiment in the hands of the Committee, but was subjected to further expe riment by the Bank under more fa'yourable cir cumstances. The second trial, however, it ap pears, has failed like the first. If the Bank Directors have abandoned the idea: , . of any invention for the prevention of•forgeries, in utter . despair, they should openly confess it. For some time back there has been an indecent trifling with public humanity. One quarter remains from which to expect redress—the Parliament—upon which it is now an imperative and awful obliga tion to check the crime, by rendering its com mission more nearly impracticable or like the Bank, time Parliament.should fail In this, then to correct the horrible anomaly of . shedding blood for an offence unaccompanied by violence, and into which, in most cases, a famished wretch is tempted, not only by•the secrecy, but by the un exampled facility of its commission.: IMPORTANT BANKRUPTCY. •ANI) GIBBS Yesterday a Meeting of the Creditors, under a Commission of Bankruptcy in this case, took place at Guildhall. The place appointed was the Lower Irish Chamber, but on the arrival of the Commissioners it was found so crowded, that an adjournment to the Court of Common Pleas was agreed on ; before, however, the persons con cerned could approach the Court, that also be came, so crowded, that the Commissioners, to avoid the intensity of the pressure, proceeded to the Hustings in the Great Hall, where they opened the proceedings. As soon as this became known to the' persons who tilled the Court of Common Pleas, they all rushed forth with an eagerness that could scarcely have been exceeded had, they been certain of receiving 20s. in the pound at the Husting. The Commissioners and other persons on the Hustings were soon so pressed by the numbers that surrounded them, that an adjournment to the Court of Common' Pleas, which was by this time empty, was agreed on ; and after much difficulty, the Commissioners, and persons immediately concerned in the pro ceedings, succeeded in making their way to it, through a crowd that Were evidently as anxious as they were numerous. Many persons of dis tinction were present. The Commissioners stated., that it was not thought advisable to proceed to the choice of as signees until a greater number of creditors should have proved their debts, and desired any credi tors who were present to proceedwith their proofs. —Several debts were then proved without any observations, but on a Mr. Johnson proposing to prove ,a debt of 701. a considerable discussion took place. Mi.. Johnson stated, that the only- evidence he had of the bankrupts being his debtors was their own books, by which it appeared that they had received a dividend of 701. on his account out of Mr. Wellesley's estate. Mr. Gibbs was applied to say whether that sum was really due to the claimant. Ile replied, that having no access to his books since the commission had issued, he could not positively answer the question, lint ac cording to his recollection, the money had' not been received for Mr. Johnson, although it might possibly be placed to his credit in their books.— He explained this by saying that they frequently in their books debited the account of a person for whom they were to pay money, and credited the 'account of a person for whom they were to re ceive it, without any actual receipt or payment .of money having taken place. The Commissioners, after this explanation, inquired of Mr. Gibbs, whether lie could by his books determine the true state of every person's account with whom he and his partner had m)- nev transactions? Mr. Gibbs declared positively that he could. Mr. Montagu, who was Counsei for the-bank tea. td teceiving Alt. Johnson's claim before it . .Itould be ascertained whether the bankrupts had received the money from Mr. estate ; he. said this xi; as a question of vital importance to the -creditors ; it was not Mr. Johnson's claim for 701. that was to_ he decided by it, hut claims to the amount of 100,0001. The Commissioners, after some consultation, said, Mr. Johnson's claim mast he received, sub ject of course to be either contirthed or disproied by further evidence. Mr. Montagu stated to the Cornmissiouere§,. the : several persons entertained doubts of the validity of the petitioning creditor's claim, and that it might prevent a great deal of unnecessary trouble and expense, if he were again and more particularly examined in proof of hip debt. The Commissioners said, that the petitioning creditor had sworn to his debt to issue the corn mission ; that they had examined him respecting it before they had opened the commission, and again on his proving under it ; and they cer tainly would not now call on him to contradict what he had so repeatedly sworn ; a proceeding which they conceived would not be strictly com patible w all- their duty. Montagusaid, that if he wereCouns4l. to the petitioning creditor, he should strongly ad vise.him,tc. have it ascertained beyond the.possi bility of a doubt whether the claim lie had made. on the bankrupt's estate was a valid debt, sif it shouhi turn out at any stage of the proceet/ins that his claim was not valid, the whole of the expellees would fall on him. The Learned Gen tleman said, he had known a case in which' a commission hind proceeded so rat' that upwards of 60001. 'expellee had been incurred, after whiClt it was ascertained that there was in fa`et no debt due to _the petitioning creditor,- and he was'ia consequence obliged to pay the whole e"xpence ; it was, therefore, very clearly the interest, or th., petitioning creditor in this rase to ascertain that important fact, of which at present much doubt was entertained in the early 'stage of the pro ceeding, and it was also the interest of all the other creditors, that, , if the present ComMigsion had issued illegally, it Might be set aside, and an unexceptionable commission issued. 1f tire Corn* missioners had any doubt of their •ppvers in ext., case, a short. petition could lie presented to -the Chancellor, by which the. question could be im mediately decided. The Commissioner said, that on theeappoint— . mea t of Assign ees , any inquiry into the claim - of the petitioning creditor that might,,f;e thought necessary could take place, but they had thine all that in the present stage of the pro . ceediligs was either usual or necessary. . The'C.ommissioners then appointed March 6th, 13th, and 17th, for receiving proof of debts ; and March the 9.lth for the choice of Assignees. LA W INTEL Li GENCE.-: COURT OF CHANCERY, Figs. 27. . QUEEN'S COLLEGE. , • The r ORD Cll.l VC E LIM, on cowing into Court, obserced, that-as the interests of other Colleges were involved in the decision of this ease, he should defej giving his judgment until Tuesday neNt. STRATHMORE I% STRATHMORE. This Was a 'PIA in Bar arising out of r hill that had been :filed by - the next akin of the said plaintiff, the infant son of the late Earl of Strath more_, for, ; the,purpose of carrying the tkusts bf the late' Earl'S, Will into execution ; and the present defendant, theJion. Thomas Bowes, the 'brother of the late Earl, entered his Plea io the plain(iff's bill, putting his legitiMacy at issue. Messrs. HART, IIoRNE, and SMADWELL were , heard in support of the plea ; and from theii argnm . etas it appeared, that the plaintiff had been boki . before solemnization of the marriage of the Countess of Strathmore with his late father, and that he claimed the title and estates of . the Earldom .Of Strathmore, by virtue of a Scottish Law Which extends the privileges of legitimacy to those,. whose parents, being dorniciliated sub jects of Scotland, may subsequently marry.. The Loan CHANCELLOR declared that with out entering into the question of jurisdiction the plea could not be maintained ; but that it, way only in the House of Peers that the question between the parties could be' determined. COURSE OF EXCFIANGE, - A nistet tlatn Ditto, at Sight l2 6 Rotterdam l2 10 • • Antwerp 12 10 Hatiihurgh 98 2 24 Vs Minna. Paris, 3 Day's sight 25 80 0 Us. • . Ditto Ilottrdeatix, ditto - Frani:fort on the p.t.4i,; ' Madrid Cadiz - 35 Ede/sift liiilma fiat evillna 15 Sevilte . Gibraltar Leghorn I;enoa •r3i—Venive, Ital..Li v 27 60 Malta. Palermo Lisbon Oporto • 491 ' 11: 4 0 Janeiro 13ab101 ' 7i . • Cm -I,- $ per ettit. BULLION. f'ortmol Gold, in Coin /.0 0 0 pea 0 0 ! Foreign Gold, in Ilats 3 17 104 New Doubloons 0 0 0 slew Dollmrs 0 4 lof Silver in rears. Standard 0 4 BIRTHS. On N:pnoay tact, at his house in Albemarle-street, th e Laity nf !tidiard itedilinsou Dean, Esq. of a daughter: j Mortday la‘t, in Portland-place,' th e L a dy o f Sandfor Graham, E, q . NA , . of a son. MARRIED. Yesterday, hi St. Boto11.1), Iti , hopsvitc, Mr. S. C. NorriQt of Little Meorgste, London to Mary, eidest aaiighter ut Nll . . GrciLer, s•S'ortowoud-stivet. • . , resturday,•arter a fro , riay‘' illnesq, Mrs. HeWitt; : the wife of nr:.faioeS Hewitt, of tlio o.lJlooming, Covent (garden- On the 23d instant, at Sparro w Head, after a looz Ni:trf4aret Jean, the wife of Captain H. L. 'Lou,l South I.)evoi, Militia. • - ----_------ --- - ---; LONDON: Piinted by J. B. CA IiST,iiIRS, of No. '39, i _Areat Ormond -street, Queen+sytwe ; ink! published by W• /I- , SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South Alton -street, at-the Tut Su'' OrricE, No. 112, Strand ; ,wherb ADVEI:PAiMEN TS, (-1::12E35 2 14,LTTZrt3, &c. 4.;z:.- - paid)nlusi., le addrcssed•