The Sun. — London, England, 1808-07-29 00:00:00

k DUBLIN, 'JULY : 23. COURT OF KING's BENCH, JULY 14. TRIAL REF:ME THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE AND A SPE- CIAL JURY OF THE CITY.OI , DUIsLIN. LIEUT. CHARLES WALLIS,. OF THE DIZIVERS' CORPS, V. LIEUT.-COL. BROOK YOUNG; OF THE ROYAL ARTILLbItY. This was an action for a libel alledged to he corn tained in a letter,. bearing date the 2(ith of Nov. 1807, written by the Defendant to Lieut-Colonel laean, then Brigade-Major to General Manly, Corn • a der of the Royal Artillery in Ireland, and said to reject on the Plaintiff. The declaration con sisted of several -bunts ; the Plaintiff laid his dama ges at 50001.; and the Defendant pleaded the gene ral issue and a justification. Mr. Serjeani BALL, the Plaintiff's leading Conn s-al, stated, that the Plaintiff was a 'young' Gentle man who 'lately held a Commission in the-Troop of Royal Artillery ,Drivers, havin g been appoint e d Lieutenant ther e in i n j,he ,montli of March, 1807, and was ordered to' join the corns ,then quartered in Cork, under the Defendant, who then command ed the Royal Artillery in the south-west division of Ireland. The Learned Counsel, after stating Seve n' circumstances to induce a belief that the De fendant ecteriained an unfavourable disp os i t i on towards the Plaintiff, mentioned that the Plaintiff was, previous to the month- of November, 1807, snsnended.from all military duty by the Defendant, and put under a species of arrest by him, and that the Defendant refused to listen to any explanation by Plaintiff of his conda—that the Plaintiff was never afterwards permitted to do any duty in Cork, and that he was ordered in November, 1807, to leave Cork, and repair to the barracks at Island- - bridge, near Dublin, by General Manly. The asubjett of the present action was a letter written by the Defendant shortly after, to ,Major M‘Lean, then Brigade-Major to the General, containing charges of a very serious nature against the Plain tiff, involving his charaaer, as a Gentleman, and impaling' to him several ungentlemanly acts while gilder the Defendant's command in,tork. Colonel . IVlgalta, on receiving this letter as an official .docu mant, laid it before General Manly, who .ordered it to be submitted to some of the Officersnof the Corps of Drivers, at Island-bridge, to which the Plaintiff then belonged, to make a report upon it to him—that' such report was favourable to the Plaintiff; and that Plaintiff, conceiving himself much aggriever.l by the representation contained in the Defendant's said letter, 'had brought the pre- I sent action. That since the bringing of the action, a Court-Martial was appointed for the investigation of the Plaintiff's conduct while in Cork, under the command pf the Defendant, and that 'althOtigh. the Plaintiff was, by the sentence of the Court-Martial, cashiered, yet the sentence. was qualified in such a manner as to leave the Defendant 'fully open to the present action. The first witness for the Plaintiff was Lieutenant- Colonel AP Lean. He said that he was in Novem ber last, and'still is, doing the duty of Brigade-Ma jor to General Manly, who commanded the Royal Artillery in Ireland—That having received frcith the . Defendant the letter in question, he, of course, put Plaintiff under .an arrest—that General Nanli, from motives of clemency, ,was induced t o d es i re the Officers of the Drivers' birps, at Island-bridge, to consult together on the charges contained in the letter, and report their,opinion to hitn—itwas. not a Court of Inquiry, nor was the Defendant,, or any person on his behalf, present at it, or any wit nesses examined on either side. He saki, on his cross-examination, that it was the duty of a Com manding Officer to report the conduct of those un der his command; whenever he thought it neces sary, and that he himself was the proper person to whom the report was to be made for General Manly: He said, that the letter in question contained animadversiOns on the conduct of another Officer, as well as on that of the' Plaintiff, and that he, the witness, entered the lettlin his book, as an official document—h e k n e w Lie t enant-Colonel Young for upwards'oftwenty-seven years—spoke in the highest terms of respect of him, and said, that, from his knowledge of hint, he was convinced that he was in capable of making the performance of his duty sub servient to any malicious purpose. The second witness was Captain Henry Lane, in the Corps of Royal Artillery Drivers, who appeared to he the other Officer •cottiplied of by the De fendent, in the letter to' Lieut.-Colonel 'M`Lean. Captain Lane proved ; that, being in the same, regi ment with the Plaintiff, and serving in Cork, he saw an order in the Orderly book,• in the month of November last, importing that the - Plaintiff was suspended from duty by the . Defendant—that shortly after such order, the Plaintiff wrote a letter to Defendant, which Defendant returned unopen ed 1 he said that . the Plaintiff was ordered from Cork to Island-bridge, and that he was refused cer tain acconnuodaiions by the Defendant, which are 'usually given to Office's who change quarters. On the cross-examinationl of this witness, he said that the Defendant had .once or twice made a complaint of the Plaintiff to him, and imputed irregularities to -birb—he could not say whether .the lady that Plaintiftliad at his lodgings in Cork was his wife or not. : This witness being asked Whether Colonel-Young bad not occasion to make a report of himself ? . answered, that Lieut.-Colonel Young had said a great numbei of very intainous thtvgs 'of witness,' but that lie had a great esteem for Colonel Young, which he afterwards explained, by saying he spoke in an ironical - way. The Wit ness acknowledged that he heard that the Plaintiff lodings in Cork, WitilQiit 11:1 . 6ng paid for them, and that. the Plaintiff associated• With 'non comitmsioned officers of the Drivers"' Carps, at Cork, and got drunk with them--he said the Plain tijf had made some arrangement for the payment of the debts he owed in Cork before he left it, and' that the debts he owed were not of any great amount. . The SOLI.CITOII-GENERAL stated the case ior the Defendant, and objetaed that the Plaintiff had. not entitled himself, by any evidence be bad glyen,.to a verdi& lion) the Jury, and that the Court' would be warranted, in point of law, to non-suit the Plaintiff. }le insisted that the ati of . the Defendant, in writ- ing the letter, was not the publication of a malicious slander, but was the a& of a person discharging a public duty, and he instanced several cases where one-man has charged another with the most serious offences, but belt); charge "brought forward for tie purpose of 'a neceiary inquiry into the conluet of the person accused, by a • competent tribon-al, the policy of the law would not' allow an action of slander to. b e maintained thereupon--that in the present‘case it appeared that the letter w titter) by the Defendant to Lieut. Col. M`Leni was nothing more than an official document, coming 'front the Defendant, as Comtirander of his Disiria, report ing the conduct officer under his command, and calling for an investigation of it by the proper jurlSdiCtion—that - rise Defendant , would have 'been deficient in his duty if he had omitted to make such report, and that from the cross-examination of Captain Lane, it appeared that the Defendant had very sufficient grounds for doing so=that sitould it be at all thought . necessary, he waS prepared to go fully into evidence to prove the' justification pleaded by the Defendant, bta that he conceived the Plaintiff had not made out any case to support his aCtion, there being no other ground f,;r it than the official letter of the Defendatit—ili-at the he .nourable testimony given by Plaintiff's own Witness, Lieut.-Col. M‘Lean, of the purity - of the Defend ant's motives, put it beyond a doubt that the De fendant acted without -any malicious intention to wards the •Plaintiff, and that the present adtion could not be maintained without the utter subver sion of all military discipline. ' • • Mr. BURROUGHS, Counsel for the Plaintiff, re plied at length to the arguments of the Solicitor- General, and insisted that the Plaintiff ought not to be non-suitedto which the Lord Chief Justice assented. • The Counsel for the Defendant were then asked by the Court if they meant to give any evidence? They said that they were prepared with a great .nurn ber of witnesses to prove every- part of the jtistin cation- pleaded by the Defendant ; but as doing so would only lead to great, and as they conceived, unnecessary length of examination, by which an: adjournment of the trialdo the follawing day, from the number of witnesses, would be - die consequence —they preferred leaving the case to the Court and Jury, upon the' evidence adduced by the Plaintiff himself. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE 'then addressed the Jury, and, after recapitulating the evidence, told them, that if a superior officer had received infor. mation of the miscondutt of any officer Under hit command, it would be a breach of his duty, and for which he would be liable to punishment himself, if he had not reported it to 'the General Officer to whom it belonged to inquire into such miscondua; that no man having a command in the army could exercise any authority; if an action of this sort were to lie; it would tend to the 'dissolution of every . thing in the militai'y establishment of the country he adverted to the evidence, of Lientetiane-Colonel M*Lean, 'who said that the letter Was received by him id the ordinary course of an 9ffiCial communi cation ; and that, as such, he - transmitted it to Gen.. Manly; and the same witness,' hji hiss: knOvledge, of the general charaCter and good condi - tat of the, Defendant, rebutted any - pteiunption . of a dolts motive existing in the mind of the Defendant. His Lordship also remarked on the evidence of Cap tain Lane, and told the Jury, that , 11 they beli eve d the letter in qu est i on ' was not. an' official report, but merely written to injure and 'defame the Plain- Jiff, and not 'with a view to put_ the matter com plained of in a regular course of military investiga tion, they 'ought to find for theTiaintiff ; but if they believed -the letter to be merely an ofiical communication, then, in point of law, Defendant had not written a malicions . whether' the charges in that libel were let* or faiSe;, and, there fore; if the opinion of the Jury was that the letter was of that description,' they must find for the De fendant on the general issue ; and' it was quite im material to inquire into the truth or falsehood of the charges which were subject to the second plea put j in :) . y the. Defendant. The Jury retired, and in about twenty minutes brought in a verdi& for the - Defendant, with 6d. costs. The Earl of .Harringtop, the Commander of the Forces in Ireland, sat on the Bench during the whole trial. Counsel for the Plaintiff— Serjeant Ball, Peter Burroughs, 'John Parsons, Charies Ball, Wrn. Norcott, and Rich. Eaton, Esqrs.—Agent, Philip Despard. Counsel for Defendant—Mr. SolicitOr-General, Henty D. Grady, john White, and Wth. Waggett, Esqrs.—Agent, ()slits Dunn. • SPORTAAG INTELLIGENCE. . EDINBURGH RACES, JULY 25. This day our Races commenced, when the City's Purse was run for over the,Sands of Leith, and won by . , ; . . i Nicholsgn's bay horse Rampton . A 1 r. Henderson's bay 'mare Country Lass Mr. Hendry's brown horse Pensioner Lord Momgomerie's grey coltirvine ir I 2 dr - 3 (if -" 4 2 The Ticket No. 16,90 g, 20,0001. Prize, and No. 7227, 10,0001. Prize, - were sold in'Twenti-two Shares, at J. WARNER'S . Fortunate Office, No. 16,. Cornhill, last April. Tickets and Shares in great .ariety are now selling as aboVe. • The Wheel con, tains 20,0001. 10,0001.- 50001. 20001. &c. &a.— Next Day of Drawing, Tuesday,' August 2. Tuesday next will be the Fifth Day of ,D.rawirg.: HORNSBY and C o . respeafully acquaint the Pub is that they continue their original plan of retuning to the Purchaser, of ldTicket (or Tickets to any'amount) One Pound above the price paid for the same, be what it may, after every Day's Drawing Cif un drawn), which ensures to the adventurer an easy mode of obtaining 'every Capital Prize at" a trifling risk. Prizes- in the Wheel are 20,0001:, 10,0001. 50001. 20001. 5001. &c. and the usual proportion of smaller Prizes. Tickets and Shares are selling,war ranted undrawn, at their State Lottery OfficeS, Cornhill, 52, Charing-cross, and St. Margaret'a Hill Borough. , . Thirteen Capital Prizes to be drawn of 20,0001. 10,0001. 5,0001. 2,0001. 5001, and a full propor tion of other Prizes. Next Tuescliy, August -2, is tho Day. Tickets and Shares, warranted utidi‘,vn, are selling pt all the Lottery Offices. LONDON: Printed by RICH A ftn HA R Is, of No At the S . 4, Martlett..couri. liow-st re i st ; at t.trz-Opyr.c.a No. i 12, Strand ; where "hive? tisemen-ts, Orders 1, HORRIBLE 4ITIRD.U. FROM AN AMERICAN PAPER.] You will herewith receivo . a report of the evidence in a criminal prosecutiOn, which was lately conduet ed in the Distria. Court of .Prince Edward. The case is characterised by an attpcitywhich probably has not been equalled, and certainly eteer surpassed, by the wickedtiess'ot man e , „Many resp,eetable Geim tleuten in this quarter have expressed a w isle that the particulars of Blanks' horrid crime should be Lid be forethe public. I attended the trial, committed the substance of it to paper, and have since submitted it to the inspection of e several ,Gentleirtem who heard it, who' hate eXpressed to me an opinion that my report does not:hyany means exhibit an exaggerated pici are, but that it .might hate been. much more strongly Colnured, without doing injustice to .the Gazette.) Farrnville, April2o, 1308. At the last Distrid•Court of Prince Edward, John Blanks, of Halifax county, was convi6ted of murder, in the first degree, for cruelly killing his wife in the month of February last. This atrocious murder is distifignislred by a brutality unparalleled in' the his tory of eithercivilized or sAyage - tren. Barbarians have often exhibited unrelenting cruelty of feeling towards their enemies, and have derived a malignant pleasure from their sufferings, protracted somentites, perhaps, for a whole day . ; but; I believe, another instance has not occurred,Wherein a husbanci,wl i to had not been married longer than eight or nine months, and whose wife was . in •an'advanced state of preg nancy, delii?erately formed and executed the horrid purp6se . of putting her to "death by (.ruelties repeat ed and; tortures protraCted for `SiXdays, , . ' On Sonday evening, the day. of February lasts two young men of Blanks' family were approaching his hone; when they .heard the_eeieE qt_ his wile, shrieking and imploring mercy. They concealed themselves under a fence, and saw Blanks bring her out twice and whip her unmercifully. She escaped from 'Him that night, but returned net ennrning.— He keiit her upstairs in 'the day-time, and drought her down at night. On the succeeding Thiatsday two 'Women of• the neighbourhood went to Blanks' house, and were by,him invited upstairs to see his wife, Whom, they found in bed, unable to sit - up-, shockingly bruised and beaten, and one hand severe ly bitten. On, 'riclsr evening Blanks 'was heard in hi house swearing and cursing bitterly, and . threat ening to send some one to hell. After.which he 'required one of his sons to take his,gun and do it. He was seen at that time . without a shirt, washing his face, breast, and hands, whiCh were, bloody, and one of his sons said he had been whipping a negro. The voice of Mrs:Blanks was heard in the hoUse fay a young man, whom She called, and requested Jo cbme to her; bid Blanks would not,p9rmit him to go . in: "Early On . SatUrCi4 morning twoofßtanks' 6Q/15), and a young man who had lived with him, fOnnd him in hiS tic tise sitting on a bed ; upon which was the dead bOdy of his wife, whose death he affected to lament, declaring he would put an . end to his dwn life. A:large switch, both the ends of -which were beaten to a fringe, and, an open knife, stained with blood, lay by hint. Nobody, was e in the house bin Blanks and the corpse ofhis wife,. • Se wanted his will 'mitten, and his, saddle-bags were in the room, packed up with his ,clothes. At this tinge he was intoxicated, but had not, been seen in, that con dition until e tlie`n, sin ce h e began , this treatment to his wife, whiChended in her death. Severalpersnns 'of' the . neighbb,irhood, which by ~ this time. had been 'alarmed, carne with a Magistrate to lilanks! hduse. l--Ie fired ague at two of those who first appeared; and Strongly evinced a determination to. shoot at others ; but at length, by a piece of dex tetous'inallagernerify Isis person was secured; the house was diligently searched, and no person found in it except Blanks, the dead body, and those who' had come its since the death of Mrs. Blanks. Ele did not impute the murdes ; of his wilt to any other person. . • 'The - skull Of fhe deceased was broken in several places, her head was almost destitute of its natural coveritrg, end locks of hair were scattered, over _the, floor stained with blnod. An eildrt seeiped to have been made to, cover the dead body with,,clean linen , A morning gown and two shifts of Mrs.. Blanks', with a shirt orßlanits', were found 'iii.. a .clow.t ad, joining the room in: which tiie e dead body.lay i mutt the shirt was 'the e Same he wore. on the. preceding:, Thursday, when the these were in a :State whie,h, §t}eliyed they had been saturated with tilOod, and ad attempt had beep m a d e, by *wetting ringing to h et i t out . A wound vvasi found near the 'ear of the tieee:i:Jed, witkh was nude, With a knife. 'Elie body exhibited ,a ,spectacle horror, which, in the langylg9 ; o(the witnesses,,was beyObd description. Xe . wa,, bruised and, wounded.• from - the crown lit to:. `kctil:l l to the ; feet, and mangled by the teeth as'l,veti t athe blosi, of the fflurtierer : ' ''his unfortnitate;wOman, wkn, was not flir frorme the. period of child-birth when she was murdered ; had ever maintained ti good ,repBtatian, and was. distinguished by the in::dness of her temper and her industrious attention e e dowegduttes, nor was a singl e circtinisuince iII jier cwidt4t. ed by a witness, Or ever. suggested, by which afforded . any ground ot, a cpmpl,altit on his part,- or the .sligheest palhation,f4,l/i'y ing•thewhole trial 'he preserved an ie4yeeihlextun+ e posure of facp. • Ab attempt was made tn_shew a dedtigetnient of his mind. Bdt there was nothing tiie to induce even a suspicion of his insanity"; •filtEMee!: he was,defended on e thatground. The 'itaity heSitate to 'render a. verdiel eonvieiat g- fii roc •t lar der in the first, degree, and sentetice of liOYEttl‘krs' pronounced against him .by the FesidingJitiliel'Viir the Court on the 7th dapol the term. In this Statement df 'tne case, 'nothing 'ha's 'le-1 • given but w.hat was•estßblished in open Coert, " it s • unequivocal testimony. - But the female wiewsees out of Court have averred, that if they not - been restrained •by'rfeelings which always p. - , with the, reputation-of their W , ;t11:, develop,!d lads. which would . I,KR e features of this . horrible'ecise Lee,- ee; thing which appeared on the have been communicated, but they are too hut to be told. • nrt ptiP:ishe 1 by WILLIAM ARMICER or •It),1 the Paper, I ellers tgr the Edilur,'.&e, (Dust-paid) a S.iLE OF MERINO WOOL. • . Yesterday, at one o'clock, a large number of th 6, 'Wool buyer s o f London'and its EuVirons asseinnied attain. Sadler's Repository-yard,' in Geswell-street , to attynd a Sale of Engnsh-grown Merino Wool'. announced tiy Lord Son`h:loa. and other owners of Spanish flocks in country, to be annually held at this place, fur disposing of their wool by public ,auction. Twenty-seven lot's 'of wool, principally of crops - between Merino and 'Ryland Sheep, 'were "put UP and cßickly disposed of to the tollodingboyers, Mr. Thomas Shepherd, Mr, ,Win. Q.ikley, Mr. ":5 1 " - phen Clisold, 'Messrs. Richard Tcrwii,end and Sons, Mr. Molding, Messri. Dyer and Swann!, and Messrs. Andrews; Clement, and Co:. at from 2s, to 4s. itfs per pound, exclusive of, orte lot tit scowered wool? which fetched 55., id. per pquird. The above wool: are stated in the catalbsues to 1) 6 the property of Earl Mminers, Earl Maustidd, Loll Somerville, Willi;rn MittOrd, Eq. Charies denkire• son, Esti ; John Wilson Alien, Esq. and others.-- - Besi•!es wool-staplers aod others wrineaed with tike woollen trade, we i e as present at the ,s4lg , Lord SomerVille, Messrs. Compton, Searie,•PPlr'• Allen, Green, &c. Messrs. T. and R. M artin , ot Coleinan-stre et , were the auctioneers., • At the ,conclusion o f the s,ie, which took platfP in the spacious lofts in the Repository-yard, where *the wool was deposited, Lord Somerville g,:ve an in" vitation to the company present 10 1 . 0.L141 1.0 ti -1 . 0 Three Cups, and partake of a chop of hipttoti hobs' a fat wedder of his true Merino, Bre‘2d. "nerous proposal was of course accepted by inaor, and soon after about thirty sat down to a , veil' excellent 'repast ; wlhieli enoed, - some, bowls of es.' cellent - pupa) were set on the tables, a:id an boa 'or two was spent in the:most auimated and in [cresting conVersation„ Uri stib j eas connected the business - o f • the• • day ; in the 'course of which Lord Somerville' rose and - assured the 'dould. pa• • ng,'" that no views to hip own individual terest had beento mix in .his eiser - flons towierds . 'estzthliShing the pret-ent sale) for having himself alw6y had .the Wide vent for _liiS Merinb - and Merino Wools, at pricesan' v s , .erino• his utmost expeela o - e ven ••k • • previotAlyengaved.his Wool of tins year to the for. , thee buyer, Mr:Joyce, he had been, actuated by the wish O. being serviceable to the possessors, of,Alerinet• Sheep, — eslYeCially . thoss'e whose hocks areatprormiC- Small, ,by opening a wart wlhert such might Ase sore Of Meeting a price, proportionate to the fineness and quality of their improved Wools•,,,which 'seemed ae• indispensible step to the general spread . of Spanish 'sheep, since the wool--buyers of many districts, par .. ' , tieularrY7,where 'coarse wools, prevail',, had deemo& these small lets of fine wool unworthy of their tied tice, except zit prices beneath their,true value. flior Lordship next adverted to the danger of diminution, il•not of annihilation, to which the Merino .flocli 4. are at this • trine exposed, while depasturing iu the northern provinces of Spain, by the ravages °lowa' tending armies; ,and argued, that this circumstance ought to . 'redoThble the zeal 'of agriculturists ill ,the growth. of. Aoglo-Merino wool, that —bad been proved so capable of supplying, its place kr', the staple, manufacture of the country. -. 44 ' 9 Lordship, farther stated, that he had received Leiter from the `Duke of Bedford, expressi‘e his regret that. a prior, engagement preveniehis • attendance, and that Grace had; engaged. his Merino wool of this year to Mr. Frede° dcrick Smith, subject-to the prices [etched by Aar wools at 'this sale. Lord Somerville, in' order, to show thegreat degree : of.iuenea, , which mayr in three years,. be produced by crossing proper bleeds' of English "sheep with . Spanish 'rams,: produced. 0 - s cowered fleece of Hereford and Merino wool; three tithes crossed; which, Was pronounced tci be of yell superior quality. The• buyers very generally es'; pressed their_ppprobation of establishment . thionifial . ,sAle, and promised a very full 'attendance ( next year. • „ . Mr.. William oAleywasin, theChair r and sev - e 4 , ral appropriate and patriotic Toa . sts were"giveu. • . ; . Thellonse , of;Mr.:H a rp e y,' i n the FUlha,m-toacli was etatered , on Twesclay by three thieies,birt the/ weitt. prevented_ carrying off their booty - by 't tie ~agad city of a house-dog. The robewrs effected 'an ..el3 trilm.-.6 by the - baCk4citir;'hafmg got oVer the g,ircierl,, wait'':The clog set .up a tile: !chef), and 'r aitii4ards wencop::smirs to - Mr. Harpeys bekro'bra l i 'door, wilete.che continued to alarm the house. The thieves. titA , ''theii , ekaffe..i, •- Military:Officers that traVeleisure, or are going on F , arig - n Service, lvOt,fa --- t*: well' to take "zi 4 Set s 4l Magaziries with theiti l and if'3 1 •Vbitirries, Octavo; are-too nutner(ids foiotib Genilern a n, to ler., the.Std.becoale the prop ny of the Mess; . ay., ( llhe; aecominodstion will be tblt'sari - i: the Work . is et - ir bellisned with-near.4oo Copper -plates. ' ' • •• • SHIP cnAvresiwo, JULY 27. Passed by—the fier.oes, ;, m. • Sit Sidney Smith, I.4(l(tir, titim Jamaica; Levant. Hopp) kct,s, (4 ,, faiLitr,; Woader, I)datl-b;itroM and c4jharib.2, . : )(r Cork.. p. - : .111.4 :. • ;,! itt* ne (Burch, the Aw Mak 10.- • Coo}, r, w.• Yrettiiimt,f; o:4set, to Wlis.i,l3acon, ii,c cc of St-t‘t,u1.6.41, ijcvotishirt.:-sueet , ,' Portlaw.l - thq zith inst. At-St. i v;:kl tiWs in 'the Fivicis,-164ad4ltti.- ref ot'A "Lenriette., (14uglity;Kot jtyljaati Van cia P..actevoo,;, Esi of 1.)//:;4). s , ; , •;rani,e, hear. East C;ritstea, - ,1, Stl s ° ..7,? aye,t 46. • J , secand'i.fau;;lT' L ,V t - Ingreth.ll.:ll, Essex: her age, Mrs. Illemigrika:3set, Es . of ~: ,'.n. YEsT .6 • i • ,1,1 !: 9g 7,i -5 , r 4 It DAY It.(114 Stock, 18.1 , 1. imila Builds, 4S. 63. pr. xc , .equzr hills, 4S. 7S. Pt. omaluin, mdetvii 3 per Cent. b;tto A ur. 7 J I f.,6ths Cor►, ,or zith Aug. 65 3 1-1 68f; .• 68.1 R :•• " • , 3 , i• . ,:3 i oohs • ,41t60 Al• 1 t } Nl)ol , `, I.>l.(llitjE 10-Aluik" ROW. I\4 l Orning, after 6 Afternoon, t 8 min. afze: • 111S1 I.lu ~~ I I •-_-~ C 4 sk Si } Pe 4ke - 1 ctin tere Lo u rat, :3 1 4: SIG, in f i 4‘,1% 'co t , nrc the