The Sun. — London, England, 1810-03-06 00:00:00

~~~r~, r `~`..:~ ~...) ... ,\ p ~,• ;'::^l4' '‘• ~..: 7 4 % ‘,..,/ - z. - _ , , ;J. )•14.1.21t Sre.!lY ititia,"signed I S. Thotil. :on Milifia, Gent. PRESENT wOr e Coull, • . t, Lsq.(4P 11/4itimlmit 5454.1 d 3rpenter, t; :veo, Alesr b ; 1;. C. 114' • an d Spa' at Gu ild; Livare. J 9, z ° , , or leti-dra ref lc Star ana T e dburY o 'Lincoln of s K 6, at o'is! . ,1, Lood.Q" • at tveiv4"- March 0 . ! • ray's-Ina- .. t oourecto, IL (Unbar?, .at cit„ vg A r :non, .01 - 11:1 00 / . • I ' '113" • L ti , if 11.L.11(10, rrey, br lci f * : at tell , a . a s , Cati . ` 's Stortfor(!itt r lpitt o"rif 7 , an ouve ‘at • - z . tidge.-stlec‘P, Meet, (114 . at : cleyeii, of 1B r 1 i s t. . •averil, St(" ildtr.til. pry dealer, ut Lindsliirer )u6i l . r , 'AOC at, 4 g at ciCveil, „ t .Gas . ici 4 ;&, ugh, cou lit/ Inc (...;',:064, neY, Haber•` i;cti-dr a P, g4 o ncion r;'e cifettO sgate'w rick 12Yer''''f; streety tvvive , • timUer,Wer' 311% to ,13e.ttlx.! iilcti.4ll. ag. )I)keel ) q- r ' . Stoi. Lreet, Star" suadv wirellowig7 drord, cry rpent e t r , :Idi, • o f Wiall°ll' ifiteturcr• eN-hospitAlt ,---` v arcl aC°';'- or ~ Lodi' ° (l.P°lll' bouci!clE. sq• qilter ity daun s ' o f Vier .. 01 ----- wife , C Coulity 0, of 1-larlioP lii) ag: sq. Of 13-. ! of RidEirO., and tUrDery 1' is brotber, • 0 A f f;. !rity er . ot +ll -eet; Ullear gltte:SU CCr' mr. 1071 0 ' rcet, , _...... , - bzrrierrthe i CYCEUM THEATRE. SPtor ,eciil License of th e LORD. CHAM BE . .4 Lied t'! - esent Season t o the joint application LAl of R N, m h, ,' , rti esprincipally interested. THEIR 111 ' • ' • ajesties Servants, forming the: C0M ,,,,--1,„ ' ,tN Y of the late DR.LTRY I,..‘NE,III:IEAI'ItIE, ip p er. 'IPRESENT EVENING, Alaraltffot4 9 he Comedy ot MU CH ADO, ABOUT NOTHMG. Alter Itimicit.iseientii time a now Musical Farc.., in Two W. 4, called „ Hlr'oll iVIISS ! On I\l, .., ' • -r s'‘av The Honey -Moon- with Hit or Miss! - i) 'e."- i.. FORD; FICTCIALLING.Y ARD, - - Feb. 24, tSio. 'h t 8 ' T ii ESE are to giOe Notice,: That on Thursday, ti et - to 4 111. rch C Forenoon, .Ten o'ock ,in t Forenoon, tr , ill ie ex-P ffal qt hh 11 • ' . Vitt valling-liird s ht DefllwA: iii„,6l, Lott o .t aiesly 1 4 , • - • o f th a • - • prbvirions" a-id Piaualling 41, ,,-„,, - , ;4. eJo ° 7 nog . . Br o r 6 ' d-- ' wead Dtist, Flour, - Raisins, Currants, Pease ; Oat. Baize butte -'oatmeal. S weepings," Flour Sweepins,- kut-Barley.v r°u"'S%"''eePli'gs'i- Beet; Pork . , Suet. empty Tierces, bent - ' Ch.eese-, Bags and . 6gs, 1 rim Hoops, broken and §taves, Boards Ends, . Fi: e. wood &c.. &t ' 1,, The Pel7ll allov; ed for the aeliveiy of the Lets will be Font . e. 44;7-vorking dgys, 'jet* the day of Sale, and nit less than . , rhe.m °l- .'he goods -sold to each Purchaser be removed with eLly,. seven da ... 14 . -* and the rema i n d er i n . the urea following A.; . I h Zot al - °I " °I 2 5 1 . Per Cent. is tube made upon . the aartoanto, etc h the.,.. 11 / 4 4 4 an d."'ie °` Sale; and if the remainder of the &lam hie not be jorj-leethe dlrticles remcved, as above .ttafed,. tbei.the C I)CP rb.wll olit to 4 11 du. „ „ cit.,: 44 d- the C-o'odr to remain the In.operty o„, , ---......___________°ll of time will oa any account he Erwin:di - , P 'Cr Uda tIVG.:OFFICE; Feb. zS, fdlo • lIIIHEC64 IIII SSIONERS for VICTUALLING FrQll'r4YEsrrs WAVY do bei e ly g i ve N ot i ce , - on s „ 1 5.174166:2; " : 1 1 ) : a i n e, d ta th ir eywi l be ready ia re c ei ve T en de rs _for the.Suppiying of SEA PRO _ 2 A 7 v la h is ' Majesty's' ship: anduvessels at guifax, in Scotia, evelec, j, Canada ; Norfolk, in Pitglifis i-• 'rd 41.0 e '44Voand e y BC, inucia, (to,tiGiwir i n one Contraa) for Twill.* 3 4 Z,: 7 1 ' 4 , 4, front the . 22d of uFtit . next, and a therthet•r weld ti c Qs warning shall be given on either s i de for ertnz th e „ f. 6 , • s i t ter laid .fiar 4 41 e. • paya ble wi th Int erest , ninety day: The c °Ste t .. • °12444 "z of the Contraa may le seen at the Secretary: * at , e - " rce t ; ow be had h any Tender in which th e P r ie rs s h a l 16 e :cords at leng th , or t h at shall notbe delivered Nne , 441 : 4/ 41.4 6e fi*e One. o'Clock on the said Friday, the Ist of :enlist the Person who makes the T en d er . OP some .44 : 1 •11 " a ny 6e64/1, attend:l to answ w er. hen called /or e—Nor r en •der prices up on some are aid ,t -tonsi% 1?)i at contains extravag antccs much i nferior to the real value upon Gibers) 14 ed as proper to be admitted: rRii NSPORT.bFPICE, • . March 3, azo. P I IR CO4ll/PUSSWATERS for Conduaing His Car e o i: jil"'ES.TY't TRANSPORT 5z.121/ICE, for taking qf la -4 * and Woanded Seamen, and for the Care and Custody v eg ; .414 "'' "1 ;Par,, do her e by give Notice, That. 6 9' w i l l h e *eh: 4 1 ; 64 O f on Friday, the 16th of March, 1S t°, to re; l ''k to : :: -e , d re 'ders i and treat 'with such Persons as may be vsr - , st, , ' l.4 ci for VICTUALLIN. l'riserzers of War in Silk' ~" 44 ' 4 La Caton flespitai and Prison Ship, at Plymouth, vi's 4:1:11.117Nas certain, from the Ist of April next; and for for ;,,, A . iq Prisokers of ;Par in ' Sickness at Norman Cross, - 5,10,4, c ' hi, r ert aiol Irem the Ist of May next. 7 s r d er 'will be received after One o'clock 07i the Day V per ciLir. ' 4° P eV noticed, uniess the Party, or an . Agent. forhiin,', ''''‘,l6l ate fPo,„ ow Each Tender must be accompanied by a . Letter l'er loo !' resPe,l46le Perv:nt engaging to become hosencl with the t6e rso(endering, in the Sum of sool , for the date performance of nir„,t i. , f ot ,; 4P t• & 'br . v Par tee's ticulars 1, may be knO wn y applying at this ,Offeco, , P ‘vmouth, and C a p t . P ress f an d , Norman Crcus. V Stj'er•l'LL6 " ---. ) t -------7---- I FE --,---77—N, NtAR BOSTO N , -- LINCOLN_ 413'1' (3 S b' It " ' -i-E CONTRACT, esir'6.leu,ll4lEVE-1161,131r ...,5TATE, Tithe-free; arl). c.:titat tin* of kci;mblete i,artn, c,olllP.tf:iinagMs:Sasnudaeel 4 frliitilziltlnseseu,r4.4ttzhermeord,o4,ervderLt.dottt-t lid' Pasture i Ground, in a ? ° ,Otainl, t fe of eultiv at ' ic ' i, e c ‘ iivide'd by thriVing.Quiek fitudgtees! Z.S .6 t'ltther by admeasurement, 31e. Acres, , si a d ehepr4e,,btli!rtti:ine -pFro,e-niti,:aefo• miLrkbil. conveyed at G an easy ca an sy d Claydike, expense to oh t ,°. nostnn, a clSt Y itice of about nine miles. Messrs. -I,llrik3 ',e',UiseS are iiiiilet lease, at a low rent , !° I Put ::itas•uert:yile,:ry':.:caorhrir-will expire'at ad4da}.''' 1ag3!1,.2e-'reneheYs ' r i, etT,, i i: e l be aCCOnltnodatedi wi t h half LIM Put c,Frra,irt number of }'ears. f loin Burcham, Esq. tt 44111bY . cl..lars jn"Y ' he had ° m any and Rod ik-i:i-...t4"' (; ,......2 tius t ni ,°t:tt:trhee:°Pll;icen O ° f i t A b l f . kt s ta . te ina . y be seen. T HE WHITE LION INN, 'STR ATFORD Iii"()N AVON WARWICKSHIRE. ' T . ) BP 'r '. • UCTIONI. - t 1 ttk, 1.,),,,11i5‘e5 . 5p.1..). 81 A ril oi ...4y bt next, subjed Illitie'.l%-ti.eil Coll'adiiititornisdaa}s 1%111131;e then Produced' i‘, l ",, I°ll' 1' bl' 'h d -.a . --.1, th‘ve4 / -I‘' e ' • Strattord on Avon; ersaii„ , e I - II r L.LIO.N, at highly respectable Nobility and it.i.lltry wt, 4rlovyn ary frequented by the i c h int i , ipe -4_,, Sit u , : . _ iie United Kingdoin ot England, ..ris t_',,d on.the Great Irish Road from Holyhead to A , 11,Ph44 oxlough Szircvvsbury, Birmingham, Strattord on ran e ye°,r,.(l' ' 'llset,—r C7'tensive and exeellent accommodations of this z%,„, tett tic, further encomium than the general appro. likt: With which it has been honoured for many 'P h , years ‘lcil e Lella s i k , 4, 1 ,„, 1 .and Vaults are vcry extensive,•an.d pe.ll_littrelyn it)4s, ci.for tt)e deposit or Wines, and the I nil surround_ri; Qo uttr uY the Nobility and - Gentry of- the ..te ine tr a de uP'vards of 40. years with a reference m n 4i '.? file f r • , iu'lr.ttw"t of the House is a large Kitchen Garden,eo a m : ),, st a , t a (ti oits,cres of mine in- the . highest cultivation,ssannad, 'N) ;111'12en.g...tre nate ,Aeres of excellent Gra L 4144Nns,,siotel _ ,utispov,:s dolt .‘,..utli. the Inn. L 4 4 sekt of he .he e (mem may be had at Michael tticlTeieiltion 01 the whole of. the Property and other ' itlit-4,:,,r'„NaK be obtained by an application to AfeSs,mt•x' ~ Hobbes; Solicitors, Sttatlord Pa Aron. . , 1-- Fir -I : -I ,k . ...N 4 ,* II ''i - r ' - ,:. ' : .'',;',,:....;•. 4. 4' ..V . :k ::. !Li , 4- ;- , s'4 , . ~;- q :-.,02 • r 4t4:3V4ii Tif '"-::,,'" 6.: , .4 , ei 5,10 , 410%.Pf. : 4 . . - v . i ..4 - :-.,4,: , ,-- . - . 4 A ., :1 4, ,.4;;AC( 461 f,i , ,:ii . 'tl7l''li'':A,-,. liiimi 04 . v, - • I dilti I'o,, stkiitiitt _itAt -EPE:NI4I; IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. I:OUSE . OF : PEERS, MONDAY, MARCH 5. • The Bilis on the table , were forwarded in their respective stage,. Mr. Johnson, from the London Dock Company, presented an Account of the Receipts and Dis bursements of that CoMP4uy, for the year 1809.--=- Ordered_to lie on the table. • - Mr. - Irving, from the Customs, presented an Ac count of the Avci-27(-- Prices of Corn and Srtgar, and other Paper's, in - the motions, made by Lord HardaiCker—fo lie (* . l the ta.ile. • .13irl COWPER presented a Petition in behalf of the Prisoners confined for Debt in, his iVlijesty's_ Jail of Hertford. DISTI LLE RIES. Earl ALBEMARLi presented a, Petition from the Corn-growers and LanJ-holders in the neighbour hood of Ipswich, in Sullblk, zigAnst the Bill pro-, hibiting the distillation of Spi.:h s from Coin, The Petition being read, his Lor:ship observed, that the- yery indecent and um. arraritable_ haste with which- it was at;ernOtt'd to burry the Bill through was • the great cause why more . Petitions bad, not_ been .preented. He- wotild again repeat ,what he had before stated, ,that, -if suffiei , mt, time were allowed, Petitions would be found ro flow in from all parts of the ,country against - the The Poiti,.-al r.. hadjust had the honour of presenting was signed D . ; a_great, p,imber of names, and those of 'the first aspectability. • Earl BATHURST repli'd, that there was no room for the charge. made by i. , e Noble Earl, of the Bill being hurried through Pa.:riiament with. indettent and unwarrantable baste. The fact was; that the Bill bad been Wore Par*iament more than a M ont h, an d. that abuatdant: time , tlad been afforded of petitioning against i; from the remotest parts of the,country.-- 7 If it snould be ',greed that in its operation it would be found so injurious to the essential interests of the Country, as liad been asserted by some Noble Loris, the ;House would recoiled that; there was a clause iji the . Bill Parliament to' repeal or new-tootlel the during the course of the present Session.. Lord LAUDERDILE contended, that the Bill had not bear snore than four days before the House, . when it was endeavoured to hurry it to its List stage, with what was justly called .indeCent and urawar-, rantable haste. He held in his hand a Petition from several respeCtahle• Land-holders of the county of Norfolk against the Bill; and the complaint it pre ferred Wa1410! only the compla;nt of tile county. of Norfolk, but was• also the feeling of the agricul tural part of Scotland., - It was well itiat farmers had on their hands a large .quantity of damaged Barley; of which they would be pvevented from, disposing by the present Bill. That and many other Objeetions ,to the Bill would be urged from almost all parts of the kitigdom, if suftcient tithe 4 were allowed to send them in. His Lordship concluded with moving, that the Petition do lie on the table. Earl BATHURST contended that the repealing of the present Bill would afford no relief to the far mers, by taking off their hands the damaged Bariey• mentioned by the Noble Loid. The Distillers would not' purchase, nor attempt to distil from .such Barley, for They always found it their interest ta ( employ the best grain for distillation. After a Idw observatiOns froni Lords Albemarle', Glasgow, Lauderdale, and Hardwicke, it 'vas agreed o hearCouuset and witnesses against the Bill, and Counsel was accordingly called'in. After Counsel' had had been heard, and wit nesses examined, the conversation was renewed respecting thegrinting of fun I:er time, which Lord Lauderdale acquiesced in, •by moving that the debate be adjourne.d till Thursday next. Lord BATIIURST had-previously moved that„Mr. Sinith be examined,,in order_to prove that damaged' Biltrley was not used by Distillers. Lord LAU4EIWALE, however, p resse d hi s amend ment for an adjourntlient of the debate, which was agreed to without a division. Lord LAUDIitiDALE then moved the discharge of the order for Thur_sdaynext, on a motion lor.a Select Committee on the afnirs of the East India Corn - pavyi which motton be should bring forward on Mondiiyhext.—Orderedt. Adjournedd - a quarter before Eight. HOUSE - OF COMMONS, MONDAY, bIARCH*S. The &pill. London Water-Works Bill awls read a second time, and,ordered to be committed. The Sheriffs of the City of London appeared at the Bar, and presented a Petition from the Lord Mayor and Common Council against. the London Docks Bill.—The Petition waslaid,on the table. A new Writ was 'ordered to . be issued for the Town of New Windsor, in the room of Richard Ramsbottotn, Esq. who has accepted the Chiltern Hundreds. 'Mr. F...kavEy moved the second reading' of the Bill for providing a House for the accommodation . of the Jul.-es of assiz e a t Ch e l ms f ord. Tile second ts reading was opposed by Mr. 'Western and Mr. Wynne, and supported . by' Mr. Rose' and Colonel Duckett.—On a division the ntimbers were--\ AyeS 10 i.. Noes 89.—Majority against the third reading of the Bill 12. On the re-admission 9f strangers_ into the Gallery, we forint4Mr. MARTIN moving for certain retur ns respecting the e mo lu ments ai-ising from Fees in the Customs, 6 ,- .c.—Vrdered to be laid bet Ore the House, . The Committee on the Embezzien4mt Bill was postponed till to-morrow se'nnight. " ' . • THE EARL OF CHATHAM. - k. NI3ITBREAD 1110Veti thc,Order of the Day for resusiiis. the adjourned debate qu tiks Reqolutiolis • • A:3lki:- UESDA Y, ..MARcu 6, 1810. ;• - • proposed bya the 'Hort.,GentleMan ; For censuring the , nity and chareCteia and not agree With the propoSis , Earl of Chatham. - don which the Right Hon. Gentleman had stated The Hon. Gentleman observed, it would be un- Would be moved-this night, viz. (be preidous que.se necessary for hidi to offer any more arg uments •to ; * lithe House abstained f ro m the line of cone the House in the p r e sent stag e o f the debate. .It dud which the resolutions .of 'his Hon. Friend would be it the recollection of Gentlemen, that the chalked out, it could net support itsiovvidharaSter. Right Hon. gentleman opposite (Mr.-Perceval) had What had been the conduct of Lord Chatham ? As signified his intention of - moving the p rev iiaus ques- l i 'the Reuse had been i n f o r me d,' he-drew up aspriper, tion. If that should be done this even i ng , h e then which, taking ad van t age o f hi s situation of conff would trespass on -the Honse • dente as a Privy Councill o r, h e eecretly corive - y`ed to ThS SPEAKER having stat e d th e order of proceed- the King, without the knowledge of his cielleeguee log, and put the question, in office'. • That, being the Commander in Chief General CRAUFURD rose to oppose the Resolu- of an Expedition; upon eatich It was necessary tci tions of the Hon. Gentleman. He should premise institute., inquiry with respect to the failure Of, jt, what he had to say 'by. a declaration on, his part, that l he in that paper, so secretly conveyed, made a tea= in considering the-present question he- should 'dise 1 yy charge against an Officer joined with' him in come charge all vies of pertye—party virnlence, and patty .mend. That in so conveying the peper, he had prejudice, would not bias his vote.• No person could adteelenot only contrary •to all precedent arid prace I say, that in 'any one instance of his Parliamentary Lice, but had desired it should be.kept eecret. If the con Ina he bad acted from those motivesee e (ffear ! House, -the legitimate,constitutionalguardian,-could i .hear ! from . the ' Opposition.)—Gentlemen . might pass over-such c on duct without notice, t would no t ' cheer, - • bat lie must egain repeat, that in no one ift- only be admitting that it *a; justifiable, butt would stance could personal animosity, nor personal en- - also admit that any servant of the.Cl own might , reity, be charged to his account. With respea r proach the Royal ear with any statement he migl,t‘ then, to the paper of the N o bl e E ar l w h o was the -choose to draW up, in order to prejudice the Royal.. subject of the resolutions,, he •wes ready to,adMit t inind,.andsanetion such servant in desiriee that hitt that the delivery Of it, to the. King was highly izajue conduct might be kepta secret from his Majesty's • dicious; but what was the gutted-work oi the • otheeconfaclential servants. - The Honourable Gene charge against the Noble Earl ? Why, that,lie had tlemart meant those who, in the language `of .the made upa - statement; which he had delivered to his Constinvien, were, 'fOrmerly Considered' contiden. Majesty on the ieth January, .andehat he had so tial. ---/ThiS, was not \all, for the House would done without communicating with his CPlleagnes in thereby;give'authority to Ministers, to call for - any • office. Taking the faSi to be so, it would' then be- ) paper of this. kind, in order to erase such parts' ofett 'Conic necessary to inquire what . were the .motives as might be hostile to them. ' If, under those cite :which induced the. Noble Earl to seek Abe presence curnstances, such ,proceedings' . were tolerated, and of. the King ? 'The Hon. Geoeral was perfealy the House should attempt to. complain, what would persuaded, if the House would calmly examine iota be the answer of Ministers ? Why this-se-cc We have these motives, they would be satisfied, that though only done that which the House of Commons in his conchs& was erroneous,-.still there was nothing i the year 1810 declared perfeOly of criminality - in it; What was the paper ? A plain, j :had been said by 'the- Honourable General, that simple statement, drawn} up for the day of.trial, ep- ts•Lprd Chatbam did not consider t h e paper.an plying purely to his con d u ct in the command of the' # docutnenOill: the 14th February ; but what eras til;, 'Expedition. Whether in approaching the. Royal ear. evidence on that head ? What did the paper itself he hatl at.ted right, or whether he. hed . acted wrong, i purport to be ?—the Report of the CoMmander was another question. If Gentlemen Would look at r'Chief. The very signature to it pf " Chatham the combat) of the Noble Earl dispassionately, they .Lieut.-General;" was conclusive on, its bein would agree with the Hon. General in opinion, that g firs presented - to - the King, that it was an official docu- • he Must be exculpated from the charge of clandes-. , ment. (Hear, hear.) If he , had d e li vere d it iii hit tinely attempting or writing -t o prejudice the King's charaaer of a Peer, would 'it have been eo signed ?. mind Against ,apy persoe whatever. With resped flf the dosstrine now advanced;of considering thi s to his having delive r ed th e p aper t o • t h e, King,' paper ; until the 14th February es a private one was so far as that went; he was certainly culpan'e,- but to , be endured; it world tend to take from Minieters then it was only a veeial error, and conseclueoily,did t that respopsibility which they were lieble to .for any not call fur that severe- punishment which the,resoe advice thermay give to. the Kings Eery Mihister lutions of the Hon. Gentlemen went to luflia. i is compelled bylaw to sign his name to any adviCe Much had been said upon the evidence of the No he may give th e sovereign, and if i t was now for ble Eel with respect to th e time of de li veri ng the the first lime allowed that a Peer should shelter speeer.' Tate Noble Earl in his answer had merely thinselt; though a Cabinet Minister, midst his Fri; stated that he did . not coneider it a public document i vate Character, the House would never obtain sarise until .it had been sent in an officid form. His , fadion for any brea c h - o f t h e C onstitution: With His reason for 'requesting that it might be kept se- resped to its being in.ade'offiCial on the 14th of Fe cret in the first instance was, because he did not bruary, for the first time, possiblyehis Majesty wish his defence should be made public until he might have wisely reflected upon the practice of the .- was properly cal-led upon on the day 'of trial. The Constitution, and refused to receive the paper until paper was made are official docubrent on the 14th of it had been made official, and'therefore had directed . February, as the Noble Earl had stated, and when it to come through the proper channel, the Secretary -he was questioned therefore on that head, elle Noe of S:ate. During the last Session, when a Noble ble -Earl very Thaturally adeertad to it as it then Lord felt his conduct had been ung ua rd e d ' on 'stood, fire eii that day it b ecame ' an o f fi c i a l paper, the subject of- a stet in Parliament,. he stood' up, , and the answer of the Noble kart could be no oilier and confessed his • guilt, and the . House attended ' in this place, consideriug- his o ith - as a Privy Cairn-- to that confession ; but here there was no apology cillor ; when it was considered, therefore, that, in , o ff ere d , and the House mu s t divide up o n: the•ca s e the first place , his erbjea, was to prepares statement as it appeared, taking into consideration that it was for the day of trial, which was transmitted to his , s leded by the Address to p reserve i ts dignity and ' Majesty, and sub s equ en tly i s ma d e an official docu- c p hara g cter. • ment, he hoped ; when m the, motives , were consie -Me. STEP H E N c o ns id ere d t h e. qnestion wee- not deited, e the error, for so it ust be admitted, would whether te House of Cotten - ions should' agree that , be greatly extenuated ; and instead of meeting it the Earl o f Chathamai,ad acted wrong, but whetliet ith:severe ceusure, the House would be disposed he had not been guilty of a yiolationeof the, Censfie _ to consider it in the light he bad stated. With re- tution. Such was the effect of the Hon. Genileman's spea to what had -fillet) from the HQD. Gentleman, resolution, and the House must; in the event of .vie. that the Noble Earl had, under the sareetiOn of their opinion being for the latter, propolitiOn, pasts • his being a Privy Councillor, insidiously calum- ; a severe sentence upon the 'Noble Earl ; for severe , Mated a gallant Officer ; he (the Hon. General) it would be When the House came to recollect that :must say, that if the House would examine the pending the Inquiry the Noble Earl, a Privy * Coups transettion; they Would. see that no ,such impute- c ill or , a C e bi net Minister, and 'Commander in tion.could attach. Th e N o bl e Earl, frem the aloe • Chief of the Expedition, was on his trial. It Wes relent of his arrival in this country, 'was:satisfied that utterly impossible; if the •resolutions Were paesede inquiry must lake place, and he had determined in that the mattercould end with them. • The Leerned his own mind that it shpuiel be either by a Civil Gentleman declared that he had heard no argranent Inquiry, or by the other mode of, trial known to to convince his mind' that th e N o bl e E arl was the 11.:ilitary Commanders, a Court-Martial, intending ' obje c t Of censure, nor to -induce the House it prb. to produce this paper or report on th e d ay h e .drew teed to• those mea sures w h ic h would 'terminate the it up, hut not, as s had been charged on the other public life of the Noble Earl.. - .Being o this side, with a cl an d es ti ne v i ew ; that was an pbjed nion, he must ,examine the nature, of the charge ; very foreign to his mind. Such horrible,- base, stud and the premises upon which the'lion;Getttlemati .execrable views the Noble Earl never, could enter- inferred that his Resolutions ought to be 'adopted - . lain. Besides, if he had been so inclined, would With respect to the paper, upon which so Much . he have gone about it in so stupid and clumsy} a had been said, he did hot fired in the charge ally Way ?. Would be not rather have taken that title . thing stated by which'heecoirld gather an 'opinion Which . might have secure d hire from obloquy ? that the Noble Earl ha'd made any false represent:le 11Iight be not, by saute verbal cernmunication, tion to 'the King,' nor had indeed S a id a ny th i ng, - cia whieh as a Privy C ounc ill or h e was entitled to, . ther express or implied, against •the naval 'Cowman-. have endeavoured to prejudice the mind of his Ma- l der Of the Expedition, to poispn the RoYal ear, hut, -' jesty ? If 'he had been. butt a degre:e above a drivel- e he did find that the Noble'Earl had been • guilty :of her, such would have- been his cosduct. .:lie Hon.. : the high offence of havin g , as a Privy C o u nc i llor ,. General trusted, that under the circuinstances of convey e d th e :paper in questioa to Sveleit.e ,the case, Gentl emen o p pos i t e wou ld , in that-,spirit . Was there any thing hi' that conductthe thet o could be ecif candour which governed their proceedings, see deemed subversive of the principles of the Britieft the condud of 'the Noble Earl in its true light, and Constitution, for welt he must take the offence to •impute it to error, and that of the most veniol sort. s be, before the - /-lOns Gentletnan's iesolundes 'could Mr.. C. WYNNE declared, that he should feel 'be adopted ? If the paper was intendtAi to pre= greater pleaesre if on die preeent occasion' he could . ,jiadice the King's mind, then the Hon. Gentleeran have given•a silent vote ; but. the-extensive import- , should' have, su statecle it, and then • an- unenswer ance of the case called far him to state time grounds able argument would have, been furnished to hi:n, upon which he should vote for th e r eso l u ti ons of his (Mr. See.,_ It was- not correct to state a piPpositiott. Hon.-Friend. Th e 'Hon. General opposite had 'en- in one way and argue it in another. -He was jet to deaCoured to impress the House with an idea that learn how the Noble conduct errs conduct cold be charg the condu of Lord Chath a m h a d, b een merely erro- as a violation of the ConStiiutioli, and u in arguing on ed neoiise" , The, Right Hon. the Chancellor of the Ex- ; the contrary, he trusted he might be allowed to look. chequer had not attedtpied to defend - it. \Vhen, , to the principles• of, his own, profession to make it therefore, Ministers commsidere,d it -necessary for , the i out.. Where vies the ill ega li t y o f t h e. Earl ' s sindicaott of their own cha ra tters, to matte a decla- conduct ? :• Where co u ld G ent l emen tied lieu ration of dist kind, was it not, also necessary that the forfora PriVy 'Councillor to approach the Royal House of Cut:unions should vindicate its own dig- presence, was 'contrary to the principles of the '