The Sun. — London, England, 1809-02-02 00:00:00

Q. Does the witness Mean to s# that the cotit• pliments were sent verbally by the servatitvor that thity were .vritten ?—A. I think, written, Q. Did Mrs, Clarke' make known the receipt Hof the :2001. to the Commander in Chidt"?—A. Yes, 1 did. Q. When did she mention it to him On the same day. Q. What passed ?—A. I merely said that they had kept their promise. Q. Did the Comm.inder in Chief know the amount Of the notes He keeiv the 3trieunt, oceanic I shew e d hi m t h e notes, an d I believe I got one of them changed by one of his Rey'if Highness's ser. Van ts. (By Mr. Bertsportn.) .0. Where was the witness immediately before tine came to the bar ?--A. In some room above stairs, Did she see any , and what people ? r -A. tsaw Captain Thompson, Mrs. Metcalf. (the wife of Dr. Metcalf), and Miss Clifford, Who accompanied me. Mr. Wardle came in for a minute. • 'Q. What conversation passed between the wit rest and Mr. Wardle a —A. Nut a word; 'after Mr. Wardle asked me how I did, he spoke to the other ladies. Q. Did no other conversation pass between the Witness and Mr. \Vardle ?—A. No. • (By the ATToRtIeY Gi;NERAT. - ) •Q. noes the witness know Mr. Robert Knight ? b.-A, Yes. . • Esi How long - has she known him ?---r •l Lie took en oppOrtunity of calling on toe in SepteMber, 1805, m company with Mr. 13 iddulph.• (a. What conversation prisskl )4.-A. It is so long since, that I scarc,.ely recollea. Mr. linight thanked trie for the influence I had exerted in hi brother's behalf. Mr. Biddulphhad some fatroaro to ask of.tfle. •Q. Did the witness desire Mr. to keep the transaetion a sec: et ?.--.iLes, I did c':.rtainly. Q. Did •glifi `express a - Wish to 'keep .it 'a secret lest it shouli reath the ear`4 - of his Royal nighness i the Duke 0f1'0., - k, or .Woeds to thAt taw . No thing lik e it. . • •Q. ' Is'she slue 'Of that ?—A. Positive, Q. When she told iris 1;; ti: Ili t; ttnrss tlyit slte ex eaed a ,complitueiii for the share: she should ',awe in the busines; did he make any. reMark Q, What WAY. it Royal lighriLs Said, that it waivery Well; they had been trying it for . SOlue time; ',hat he thonaittone . 'or them rather a,' d but thathe q- tri • ba_'sci Jet., The ‘kituess has that when she received -! the LOO;. she sh6ifed the notes 'to bib Royal !less; What observations . did he make on, the occa kin Not any'thitig that I recoiled. Q. When was th'e apPlication first made by Dr. Thynne to the - wittieSS ?—A. I Flo not exactly re member.' U. On what day was the exchange Gazetted A. I do not. recoiled/ the day. Q. Can the witness be sure that the first applica tion was rtitde to her not usor!, : : than . three days be 'ere the exchange . was Gaieiled I—A. I tie not think it was. • U. At what time of the year dirt die trims:olmi take place ?—A. After his Royal Higlu. , ess was go. -• to Weymotula,sabout the end of July., or „ eginuing Of Angust. U. When did the witness first mention this trans,- atition to ColOnel Wardell ?—A, I do out, recoiled. Q. Abont how long agO IL t0.L1,1 have been very lately. Q. .Why does she say that it must have been very Because speak from the faa; ' Q. How lung ago Within the. last month. Colonel Wardle had heard of it in . other quarters, :Ind he attacked Ole on the subjea., Q. Elad the. witness any knowledge of Colonel Wardle before ho attacked her on the subject . . Q. What l e d to that knowl ed ge; . Q. Is the Witness speakiog.of a rirtinibetbre Colo- Jtel W4die ,so attacked her I am 1 knew • before. • Q., liow long helore.,?--A..,..Perhaps.six months. Q. Did the witness inentikn the transaction yo. luntarity to Col. Wardle befol'e he attacked her on it ?—A. lie asked me if, it was true. I told him yeS. • ca•Dttl she state it voluntarili, ordid she only state. it in answer to his inquiries ?—A. When Col.Wardle told me he had heard 91 the bustne!is, I said :yes it was true: I did not think I should be brought here about it, or I should have been apt to deny tr,• . • (.4. Would the witne s s have . ' willingly' concealed it i— 1.. 'Yes. I have sense enough to conceal any thin, b that ought not to be ma d e p u bli c. O. To %;./114,t other perscins hacrthe witness spoken on this business besides Cola Wardle ?—A. I do not Q., -to mention' to other - frieifds what she: herself slates ought t o b e k ept from the ?---A. I did not say I. mentioned it ; it was mentioned, and llten I said it was true. Q. When the witness mentioned the tranintetion to Colonel Wardle, did she gi‘e:to him the same nc • count as she has given at the bar,''--A. No, I did mot. Q. Which account was true ?---A. Both. Tit what, did the difference consist, I—A. I don't see any , difference. Flow ?—A:, I did not enter so much into de- Q. What ,Was the - account which shegave to 1:;nionel Wardle shorter titan that which she has given to the 'ionic! I—A. Considerably. Q. Can the witness recoiled' the day' of the 'month Or - Of the week on which Dr. Thymic applied • to her ?—A. Neither the day of the month uor the 'day of the Week. • Q. Neither Not on such a trilling neeaston. Q. Did not the witness tell Colonel Wardle on *what daY•Dr."l'ilyntie applied to her I—A. No. Q. Did oi.e . hit's that the application was Irtacie on Threirsiity; and that Abe exchange was glietted on the sueceedingSisturday I—A. I did not. Q. n 35 the witness told the Eions all Alm ktittw on the sialijett ?—A. I have told the Ho u se pOittore. ybd - told 0.6 .1 10qqr#0 1 0:y04 liave.told - Colond. Wardle on the 6 1 444.1---. A. Y 6, .and a great-steal' more. • • • • 00 the requisition' . dr Mr. !NAND, 'the witness `was ordered -to withdraw, and the Hon. Gentleman :then stated,:that the tendency of fhb Attorney Ge.; , neral's questions W . ,:lStoimpeach the veracity of Mr; "Wardle, which ho did not cot-cide r a-tair course of Xrocedure towards his Hon. Friend. by any mdans his intention. Whatever questions he , few hundreds ?—A. By my pen: , had Mt it his duty tti put to the witness, was witlr tl. 11y whom did you send the 4tter?-4 - . uy -. • t being a malicious tabrication, and not entitled to any , 'l'lle CHAIRMAN addressed her anti said, that her credit. He was far from thinking that any thing he ' answers were•freqUently unbeComing the dignity of Iv X it. ail ' a thatsuch ti., Attc.,,,, GE.„2._, ,erne n • wai : tl y w tom aid you send your message for a the sole view of impeaching her veracity alone, and the Anthassador of Morocco: he trusted what be had said, and what lie should The Houie , frequently laughed at the answers say, would convince the House of her whole story given by the witness to several questions put to tier. could say to expose her falsehoods could in the least that Assembly, and that -if she did not answer in affect the velocity of Mr. Wardle, arui Limiting could another manner, be should feel it . his duty to pass be farther from his intention. . - a very severe censure upon her. She was then or- The witness was then called in, and re-examined tiered to withdraw. • by• the ATTORNOY GENERAL.*--Q- What circum- I Mr. AnAte stated, in her absence, that it was his stances have you communicated to the House which iwish that no - questions should be put to her which you did not state to Mr, Wardle ? A. I did . might, embarrass her answers. not intimate to Mr. Wardle. that a servant of the The Witness was a o iinitl examined V by the ATT( I t:',' Duke of York bad got me Ch a n ge f or t h e Note, . GBNERAL. ' which I got done, that I might leave some money Q• ad you not say to Mr. Adorn that you was with my servants alters I w e n t ou t of. . town. , 'married ?—A. I said so., but he Only laughed at it. Q. What other circumsta n c e s did y on tel to the , House Q. Did veil not per s e vere i n i t .-.A . I told him you had not told Col. W ar dl e ?—I said afterwards that I Only m en ti one d i t:as a j o k e.. very little to Mr. Wardl e a t a ll. He bad • beard.the . Q. Did you not l earn t h at M r. A d am had neted story from other people, and asked' Inc whether it upon the belief that you, were `a married' woman, was true, and I answered—Y es . can say that . I Q. If Co). Wardle had not a s ked y on to te ll him from the inquiries he h a d b een induced-to' Make ?-':- , A. Mr. A.dtim;Uor' any other person;, had you any intention o f m ent i on i ng i t yourse lf ? acted iincorrealy whilst I wa s under the Duke's A. Perhaps 'I might and p er h a p s no t. prate ion. Q Had you any particular o b j et to answer when • , , . . Q. Did you not represent your hosband as the you mentioneo It to hen, or to ally other person ? nephew of Alderman Clarke ?--A.—He told me A. None whatever. 'he was so. Q. Had you any end to acc o mpli s h by ma kin g it a. Did you ever se e Alderman Clarke known to ?—A. No, the public ?—Certainly hot. ' ' ' but I saw some o f hi s re l at i ons. Q. Did you ever state tires yen had apygrooods' Q. Do you vow believe 'that your husband is tie of -complaint against - the Doke of York ?—A. My :pew to tkit Gentleman ?—A. I neVe t i t i o nirut f mends know that I have 'grounds of Complaint since h I quitted him. He is nothing to me, nor Ito against ion. , him. I have not seen hin t f o r th ree y ears, when he •CL 'Did you ever state th`-'" to arty person ?-11 ' brought an aetion against the Duke. . _ No, I never did.' • Q. Whtit business it>your husband ?—A. None. ,• Q. Did not slate, that if His Royal Iflghness Qls he not a stone-mason ?—A. No. ,did not settle your dem:wds ' u pon him, that you Q. Did Yon ever live in Tavisteck-place ?—A.. Weialti expOse him publicly ?—A.I told Mr. Wil 7. , Y e s Nut Adam, in a' letter, that if •be did nut pay me Q. When ?•;--.I do not know. 'my annuity regularly, which he and th e Duke' of Q. Did you ever live in P a rk-l ane ?— • A . Yes. York 'had promised me, that I would exp ose t h e ' letters of Q. Did you live any wh er e' e l se b etween t h ese his Royal Highness, w hi c h h e had at (EC- di tw o p laces ?—A. Ide not r eco iled. The Duke ;ferent times sent Me. 'hat was all I said. hou ses. (Mgt have taken me to sonic other Did you not, at variOus ti o i es, say to fferent When did you first - know the Doke ?—I b eg . . people, mat if the Duke, o f Y or k (lid not come to. to. be eseuied. 'recollect. your tertni, that , yon woul d . expose - him ?---B T U ., QUeinion wAg" repeated =A: -I don't 'never in ory life, to any persob whatever, nor should Q. why did, you wish to be excused ?—A.'tbat I williog,ly do it now, Mr. Adam was very angry, and that's all I ever Was my only reason. I do not t hi n k i t a f a i r ques at the letter I.fient him; did. o oh, and .1 am a married woman, and h ave a f am il y Q. Was it Only one letter wher e i n y o u threaten of children to bring up. ed to expose his Royal Highness ?—A. I wrote two letters. , Q. you mean to say that y o u was un d er t h e Did you threaDnk - e's prot ei ii on w h en you us e d i n T avislock- Th ten to expose the puk e i n both place ?—A. I lived th ere sometime w i t h m y mother. ca. What became o f th em • e,letters ?,---A, Yes ;.;but. ?--A I suppose Mr. they were never sent. Q. Did you not represent yourself in that nogii. Mani ha ot them both b .- .bourbood to h e a widow ?-A. 'No, never, but at duce them. s. gy him, and he, can pro- the court-martial, and t h en I d i d i t w i t h t h e view . of , In those letters did you say,. that if your solicita tions were not complied with, that you would ex— pose the Duke: I wish you would ask Mt. Adam fin• the letters. Q. Did you 'ever state to other persons, that if your demands were not complied with,' you ould expose the Duke of York ?—No, I never did,. I am quite certain. Q. Did you ever. tell Mr. Wardle that you wanted 2001. Ipe any particular purpose ?—A. No, I (lid saving my own reputatiou, that of my family, and of the Duke of York. Q. You never represented to tradesmen that you was a widow ?—A. No. Q. Did you not state to Mr. Knight that you in tended to writea memoir of your life for the last four teen or fifteen years, and that you had put it into the hands of those - who would publish it I don't recollth what I said; but refer to the letter, and that will chew it. Vou mentioned it to, several other people-be, side Mr.• Wardle and Mr. Knight. Who are they ? —A. Indeed I don't recolle6t. Q; Was any person present when you mentioned it to Mr. Wardle ?—A,lcannot undertake to say,— I believe there was a Lady, but there was no man. Q. Did you not mention it to some other Man be side Mr.• Wardle ?—A. I don't recolleCt.' Q. Do you know Major Hogan ?—A. No, I never saw the man ; 'but Mr. Greenwood sent me a mes sage, saying that he was sorry that I knew a man of the name of Finnerty, whout I had known at Mar.: gate about nine years ago. • Mr. CHOKER asked the witness if she recolletted wkaich.Geotlernan the Duke meant; Whom he knew to be a had stibjed ?—Bat the question was obieded to and abandoned. Interrogated by Mr. CHOKER .—Q. The witness has stated that a conversation took place between her and Mr. IL Knight on the subjett of the me-. moir; she is now requested to state • to the House „what that Conversation was ?—A. Mr. R,. .Knight spoke to me about t he'memoir certainly, but the pur port of his conversation was, that it I were about publishing the memoir theta would spare his brother. Q. Did any other conversation occur about that Subjeci, upon that occasion ?—A. No. 'Q. Did witness make any inquiry of Mr. Knight, further relative to the business in that conversation'? —A. No: Q.. Has witness been in the habit of seeing Colo nel Wardle frequently since this inquiry was first in stituted ?—A. Yes. Q. How long since- any conversation took place between witness and Cohntel Wardle upon the sub jett of the inquiry?— A l.. Not 'ping. Q. Has the conversation with Colonel WaVdle ttpciti this subject t,Aeu place sinCe - Friday last / A. The conversation betweeo Colonel Waidle and me upon this subject, took place before Friday. Q. Did witnesi see Col. Wardle since Saturday last ?- 7 -4. I saw COL Wardle at the Opera since Saturday. Q. When did witness first know that Col,Wardle mentioned tiw business first in the House of Com items ?—A2Wlien I first saw the Newspaper% and when I saw hiin alter, I expressed myself ,angry with him. • Q. Did not witness see Colonel 'Wardle on Saint , ask last, when she first saw the Newspap era A I can't Si), ratitt recoiled. Q. Did slie see Col. Wardle on SUrelay . ?—A. I sate airniist every day Or every second day. • Q. Wheu had; wituesq the last conversation With Col. Wart:l6 about' the - nu.;iness When I re. ceived the summons to attend the HoUse Q. Did you ever say to Mr. Robert Knight, twat DOke of York had. ill treated you, and that you was determined to expose not.. Q. Yon are! sure you did not say so, nor any thing like ?-No;it I told him that, I shoUld be.campelled io publish the, Duke of Yotk's letters, to enahle`ine to pay 'thy - creditriri, which he had refused to pay. Q.. Did Mr, Knight pay you .a visit voi4norily, or did you scud fur him ?•—A, Ido not recolled. Q. Upon what. occasion 'did yoo, mention him to Mr. Knight? Mier the Duke of 'Vork.bd sent ult . ! a mes Sage, in anser tp itness:lo I Soot him tor a kw bundred poutids, . that I must ,plead • soy mirriAge, or :go to jail:. Q.,\VhilO was that message seat to you.?—A, About six. ‘yeeks ago. My idwyor can tuft to whotu it was SCIIL. Q. Who k yew. lawyer ?—A. Mr. Stoket. Q. Who carried the messlge limn the ailie to you?-4, Asort of lawyer NC 110 lwei in Mary-le-hone: Ct. Did lr. Robert Knight collie to yon tarily, or did you seed for him ?—,l. I. was in the habit of 'Writing letters to Mr, Knight, arid I dare say them' still, and can tell whether I sehr for . , . Q. Did ,you not send for him particularly to come and tell:hum about the Dike's. letters ?—A. .1, did not.. . . Q, 1)41 you rot mention in your Nucor to him that you wanted to consult 'Min ti l mu suhjeti ut publishing tilt: Duke'i letter's It w:ts ouly a eatrynozi , sot t of leiter, such as 1 wal in the habit of sending to avitii Gentieineo, as well ;is to Mr. IS niiht. Q. You say you Are: mulled I,am. Q.. Y.ita gave oOt that vol.) wits a widulx The Duke of York told to do so, but that is of no eonserltience at all,. Mr. Adam..c.an tell who I am—[ rho question was repeated, and the,witness ordered to stnsi.ver it by the Chaitmon)—A.' I am a . . 1.113 r 0in.,34).„ . . ..,., , Q. tiow . long : - 7 —A, I gofer you to Mr. Adam,who bas my ge Marria certificat!,!. .. Q. How long lave you beeo ina'rried ?—A. Four teen or fifteen y4.ir,4, : , . 0. Is ypur husband hvirig ?-4, tdon't 'know. U. Have y9ti not sworn yourheif to be a 4 ! ! , Nth I haVC not: but llnke 61 Heves that I did ; and he has thni!aterted to haVe nte put4 ? hed for it.. When 1 sent to him for a te - w hundreds he.setst me lot arhwer, that be should have me put it) thepiliory or the fOr talsely swear , . nig th,..it I wa;, , , a widow, when I gave evidence on a Court-Martial. -14ut ,the fat, Was, that I staled to D.puty Jude AiiVOCate, who t,httwitki ine rveawr kit - Iciness in uskiog iihot thOGentlenott whols now et . ctottioitig me is to do, ;flat wished tuyelt* to be described widov, tot 1 . . did not w;sh to tell I was a married wonaau ;aid Ihe Duke oil*, under whose proteaion I then liv d, was also a,married mat): I -ouentiuned this . to dip Deputy Judge Advocate, at dinner tablo, (1 he ttlrßat It in LOS notes, hut I never s Wore to mons. Q. Did witness see Cal tV,srdle yestev,tay ?—A. No, noryesterday. Q. h witness certain of that ? A. Yes, I am eer t Q. Did witness see Colonel Wardle in the iore noon of this day i—A.-Ntri • - .Q. Has -Witness had any conversation with Co. letli Wardle on this subject within these last three dart ?—A. I had a conversation witivoOlohel!War'+ die about my attendance 'here,- -when he saki, that if I dici, not attend, the f~lou 3 would commit we, as they hadvorninitted ataeShetiti; bt tore. . . Q. Who Otought that la,it incs6E.ip; , :frOin Doke of York ?--4Axtrticolar frietiki of the .1.21 kc Of Yurk, ta..Wiiat is his' haine?...4A. Oho Taylor who is a shoemaker its Bona-street: DQl'. J, • inteileogitted by Lord Lprtet.XToti.--;.d. bid Wit ness, in spewing the note to the Duke of 'if Miintion to him from whoth she received it ?--•-A. certainly. Q. Dui Witness have any conversation` respetling Finnerty, excepting with Taylor I was git-61 to nfirlerstand by Taylor, that he was one of the pamphlet writers; but hdd no kno*lctige of Finnerty; never had any communication with him, • , Interrogated by Sir A. Pzootr.---0.. bid Wit nets see Mr. Biddulpb and Mr. It. Knight P—"-A. Yes. Q. Did g r . R. knight can on Witness aftei shit reci.:ived thetOol. ?—A. Yes. O. Did Witnest, in any of her converotions with Mr. R. Knight, signify a wish that the transathons which had occurred between her and Mr. Knight should be concealed from the Duke of*Yartt ? A. Never. Q..Th2.n if aay one had said that Witness had a*. serted such a thing, the pctwo sa t iliU sJi must say that which ti!sc ?•;;A. Certaitily. • Interrogated by Lord Fcn.K - i-rotia.—Q. Witness is requested to state what was sad itt thQ , note con veying the .4?001.—A. The note was seta with :: . 1.001, with Dr. Titynne.'s compliments? .and I gave the m:sit a gaiaea wt.:6 brought it . to - U. Does the \ itnes know the wail who brOuglit her 'the 2001. ?—A. No; I never exirected to be called upon about it. I thought it teas DrAhyntlei that sent it. Q. The Witness hits stated, thkit .hetwo4n .the time of tite..tivklirini(in and the ekelidnge tattin ? ; place, there wcte. but a .i . 44 (fi;s, She ;,; nOw quoted to say, whether (hit intan4 time- Dr. Thyunt! made the application„ car I) , ..tNt.;:ri the time she made the tipplieation to and the exchange being Gazetted itutnedialuly alter the application wais.inade.to I applied to the Duke, and took the opportonity -a t tt , r .dinner to , thention it. The exchange Was ac, ut n Gazetted in a few days. U. Did the Witness entertain ;tny reason to cc e.- cc - zit, or 'did she in fact ever conceal fro::1 Iliy It Highneasittlie Duke of York the visits of Mr. It: ,Knight.A. I never concealed the visits of Mr. Knighti or any other Gentleman, from the Duke Of York., '• Interrogated by the CHANCP,L,LOII of the .cneettrua.—.4l. Vilitness has stated that Col. %alto got acquainted with the aubjecrot Mr. Koight`a business, and that of other, by means of letters:; how did Colonel Wardle get possession of these let. 4 ters?—A. He took them up ; read them, kept them, and I never could get them back. Q. klow'did these letters come in the way of Pol. Wardle I was removing some mitt among them papers, and theSe happened to be lying loose, and he took them. Q. Did he take them away with the . consent df witness, or without her authority He did riot take them by my Consent. • (.. Were these letters written to Witness by the Duke of York ?-4. No. Ct. Whose letters were tliey ?—A. They were from ditThrent frit nds, Q. Did Witness ever heat of an offer of money from th© Duke of York for suppressing the public Lion of these letters, or make one ?—A. Never. Q. Did 'Witness ever threaten to put ttiNe iettirs' into hands that would wake them public; ttOiviis certain claims she made were complied Never. I never wrote to' any one but to Mr; Adam on the subjeCt, and he has my letters, : let him pro• duce them. Inrerregated by Loa STANLRY. Q. \Vas the Duke of York present when Witness reCeiVed lila letter flint contained the 2001. ?--A. N. Q. How s ,on did Witness tell the Duke of it ? A... The same day. , •., , ((Interrogatory by s:t• F. ButtnETT.),l—Q. Did witness receive any oth er mon i es for translations of a similar description with those mentioped by Mr. Knight ?—A. I did not exped to to examined as to any . other subjed this night. Here the witness was permitted to withdraw. A coeversetion then took place, by way of tnuteal explanation, between ,Mr. lierestird, Col. Waldle, and Mr, 'Whitteriad; which ended in Mr. Sutton, the Deputy Advocate General, being calfecl, whereepen Colonel Wardle rose, and having signified . that Mr. Sutton was not in attendance, but that he wol4ld bts prepared to proceed further to-morrow. Mr..W. ADAM thought it necessary to state to the House, that so far back as the year 178 g he had been honoured with a' communication from the Duke of York on thy, subjeet of his pecuniary coil cerns, and that since that period he had been in the habit of direeting his attention tq his'Reyal High ness's alfairs.----Thus situated he had the opportunie ty of being intimately acquainted with the high bo. teem and titri et integrity with which his Royal High ness always fitted, end on that groued be t hougheie Ids duty, the other night, to 4Wend that illustrione Personage against the charges K Melt were ilia nt+:tt et.l to hi* projtulice. cons‘luvood.lii tbn trust which his Royal Highness had reposed in bins,' it came to his knowledge in the year 1806, atilt a per son, celling himself the husband of Mrs, Clarke, had brought an anon of cri , n, con. against the triousDake. This circumstance rendered it twee's sary inquire into that Lady's atrairs ; and' it fell to his lot to (tired - elle investigation, In the course Of the koquiries, he must say that it was discovered that the Lady's condua had not been so corret 'Wished to represent it. Her count:ellen with les Royal Highness it was apprehended might tend to injure ins reputation, not in his military tetpacity certainly, but with roped to pecuelary !uni t es, by her exuavagaece and the debts contraeted. At this period, ho : Never,"the Royal Duke was asst tart linc:ti to believe that there was uny thing wiling itr the conduet of this Lady, and it Was flit until some very . iteperrant discoveries - were Mate that Isis lt.syel Highness wasconvieeed of her mishellitvieur. Slits had repeatedly endeavoured to mom ieutiey ke el him, and these ettempts could be brooght home to of key proof. He bad accurately investigated' tee retunstences'tto which he alludeo, thr e e , e „ sistarxe of Mr. flume, ernibent was discovered, iheein •1806, MrS. e mai pet sons, hrtCl Wrlttt":l to Ow Duke its core money. Soon Aftvr interview eeitle 'tee 'Lady, his Royol 17 - 112,:lu t e, e lee. nig undertaken to defeed her in an fietiois, 'in evisice cteScrilkd hersellas a widow. Io the course Of . the.procee,i, 111:,:',3 a appeared that :11c- wa3 a Illaftit,l wiamare it!z•