The Sun. — London, England, 1836-11-12 00:00:00

PRICES OF STOCKS THIS I)AY AT ONE O'CLOCK. Bank Stock. 3 per Cent. Red. 50 1 , 1 4 % 'Ditto Bonds 3 per Cent. Cons 87 6% 7%U% !South Sea Stock — 31f per Cent. !O Id Annnities Ditto Red 94%%3y New Ditto — New 3% per Cent 95% 6%13 per Cent. Annuities, 1751... --. New 3 per Cent — 1 Exch. Bills, .£l,OOO 8 4 6 2 dis. Bank LongAnnuitiesto expi re IDitto 500 8 3 dis. Jan. 5, 1800 14 9-16% 9-16 Ditto Small Oct. 10, 1800 14% IDittO Commercial l2 pm. Jan. 5, 1860 14 11-16 ' Ditto Advertised — —pm Jan. 5, 1880.... - I Bank Stock for Account.... .. 200 April 5, 1880 — !India Stock for Account ...... ... 252 Jan. 5, 1870 — ' Consols for Account 87%% Omnium pm. 1 PRICES OF FOREIGN FUNDS Austrian Bonds Belgian Bonds ............ THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK. Peruvian Bonds Ditto Account . Brazilian Bonds .... Ditto Account — Portuguese 80nd5.........~ Ditto Account — Ditto New Bonds 54 1 i 5 1li Ditto Account 5514 Ditto, 3 per cent. 35 4% Prussian Bonds — Russian Bonds, 19'22 106% Ditto Account — Ditto Metallic Spanish Bonds — Ditto Account — Ditto Bonds, 18 34........19!i 19 1 4 Ditto Account I9N French, 5 per cent.......... —f. —c. I -- 4 per cent —l. —c. , -- 2 per cent. —f. —c. Ditto Account Buenos Ayres Bonds ....... I)ittn ACcount Chillian fidnds Ditto Account Columbian Bonds Ditto Account Columbian Bonds, :824 2l Ditto Account ........ Danish Bonds . Ditto Account Greek Bonds Ditto Bonds, 13?5 Ditto Account Alexicali Bonds, 5 per cent Ditto Account Ditto, 6 per cent. Ditto Account Neapolitan --- Eichange —f. —c. Dutch, 2% per cent. 52%1 4 5,6 Ditto Account 52% Ditto, 5 per cent 9814 9% Ditto Account — PRICES OF SHARES THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK. Paid. Per Share. Cobre Copper (treat Western Railway Company Brighton Rennie's) London and Blackwall Railway Manchester and Leeds Railway Comp North Midland Railway Company South Durham Railway Company National Provincial Bank of England Provincial Bank of Ireland 37 N 01C, fib 12% 1)! 23% pan y 2 !, , C, 25 COURSE OF EXCH Amsterdam C.F. 12 ti Ditto, at sight Rotterdam "U. 12 0% Antwerp... Hamburg. M.B. RI 13% Altona Paris, 3 clays' sight 25 50 Ditto ....................a Us 25 8 5 Marseilles. Frankfort ori Maine, Ex. M 153 Peterstangh, ruble 3 Us. 10 0 Berlin Vienna, effective II "MlO 12 Trieste ditto lO 12 Madrid 15% Cadir IC , 7i Itilboa Barcelona S , ?.ville "It; Gibraltar NGE YESTERDAY. Leghorn 47li Genoa 25 90 Milan Venice 47 Naples 4O Palermo per oz. 121 Lisbon 5 t Oporto 55 Rio Janeiro 35 Bahia 26 Buenos Ayres -- Dublin, 21 days' sight Cork IY: PRICE OF BULLION, PER OZ. Portugal gold, coin CO 0 0 Foreign Gold, in bars 3 17 10V 2 New Doubloons New Dollars Silver, bars, standard 0 0 0 PRICES OF IRISH STOCKS, DUBLIN, NOVEMBER 10. 3 per Cent. Consols Grand Canal Deb.. ti per cent. - Ditto Reduced - _Ditto, 4 per cent 3 1 4 per Cent. Stock 94 ?lliberni . an 'Pank Ditto New, I•S3uu : . 1 1 per Cent. Debentures Slit ;National insurance Co Ilank Stock 202 i City Debentures, 4 per cent... - Royal Canal Stocl :;sl.i 1 Ballast Office Debentures, 4 ()rand Canal Stock - MAILS. Arrived. Due. Ainericl O Brazil 0 Ayres 0 Carthagena 1 Dublin... 0 Hander, Arrived. Due. Arrived. Due 1 France 0 A Lisbon 0 0 Guarn.SzJersay 0 0 Malta 0 Hamburg I A Mexico 0 0 Holland 0 Jamaica 0 Leeward Islands 0 I Waterford (I HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORROW. Mo mug G nmutes utter 5 Evening 31 minim, alter 5. HAMBURG, SEPT. 2S, 1836. OUR Friends, and ail those who may have to w r it e to 113, are requested to be particular in directing, HEINE BROTHFAIS, in lIAMHURGH, and to observe, that a letter with one inclosure doubles the Postage only, but several inclosures would by far increase the same. 'rims 0 0/., or 301., for instance, if remitted in One Bank of Eng land Note would only cause double Postage, but 101. remitted in Iwo notes, would be liable to a much higher charge. It is there fore most advisable, for any Person having to remit Money to Ham burgh, 10 forward the amount in One Note; or having to receive :`,Loney from Hamburg h, to receive the same in One Note, when ever possible. Of course remittances from llamhurgh to England, surpassing the usual amount of One Bank of England Note, may rather be made in Bills of Exchange, on London. To save expenses that may cs well be avoided, we request our ou-respondents not to overlook then,! particulars. HEINE BROTHERS. The publication of THE SUN NEWSPAPER commenced this day at 10 minutes past Three o' Clock. 7% , f .&_ : - ',--_-, , -‘,,,,y , -4,•,.- , ',7;:,A.'f---.4,-,1;.,, -- -!, At ~ j - 4 —\ • ? % . ~e,,. ''- '4 ,-''' , -t r,, -; ~ (. ---4 - ' ~ ', t .&.---r- - , !.:,- , z,)m,si, / na l cfs LONDON, SATURDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 12, 1836. The advices received this mourning from Madrid are mere details of intelligence, which appeared in the London Journals of yesterday. On the 27th ult. General ALArx arrived at Campanario, and it was ex pected that he would pass the night of the 28th at Nalvillar de Pela. This town is situated on the right bank of the Guadiana, near the frontier of New Castile, at the foot of the Montes de Toledo. General Roan, had received information that GOMEZ with his band intended to march by the Sierra to Avila, and thence attack La Granja and Segovia. He therefore took possession of the Puente del Azo bispo, by which step he prevented GOMEZ from cross ing the Tagus in ' that direction. As on the 28th ALA Ix was only two days' march from the enemy, and as the QUEEN'S forces were so stationed that the re bels could not move in any direction without exposing themselves to the attacks of one or other of the divi sions, and as any delay would expose them to the certainty of being completely surrounded, their posi tion was critical in the extreme. Undoubtedly we should not regard the danger to GOMEZ as imminent, but for the recent attacks made upon the War Minister in the Cortes. Itopth must now fight for his life, and therefore we anticipate a succession of military movements, which shall go a great way towards the re demption of his past errors. ALA Ix, too, must be sensible that even his insignificance cannot save him from sharing in the judicial dangers of his Chief. The Army of Spain, like that of France under General DUMOURIER, is a congregation of citizens, not an assemblage of mere soldiers. It will obey the behests of the Cortes, not the commands of its General ; and the voice of a single Deputy, charged with the audio= rity of the Chamber, would suffice to place every General in the QUEEN'S army under instant arrest. The establishment of Provincial Extraordinary Tri bunals, for the trial and summary punishment of poli tical offenders, within fifteen days after their arrest, will produce great excitement in many parts of Spain. The measure unquestionably sanctions a fearful stretch of the executive authority; but its adoption is justified by the general danger. Extraordinary diseases require extraordinary remedies. Spain is in the midst of a great political and social revolution, and nothing but energy, firmness, and well-timed severity can prevent the perpetration of the most frightful excesses. Above all, the Ministers and the Cortes must guide and pre cede the movement. Herein rests their safety, and the the stability of the Constitution itself. Strong heads and bold hearts can alone check the enthusiasm of the fanatics, and impel the lagging pace of the timid and the desponding. Spain wants a leader—_a chief ; and his place, till found, must be supplied by the Cortes. It was rumoured in Madrid on the 2d inst, that the Government had resolved to send the Infant Don FRANCISCO DE PAULO to Paris, on an important Diplomatic Mission. Surely the Spanish Govern ment cannot be eager to convince the world that it has lost its senses. Don FRANCISCO DE PAULO iS the last person in the universe to select for any mission, requiring for its proper discharge a scruple of tact, reason, or diplomatic ability. Every person acquainted with him must know that though an easy, quiet, good natured man, he has no more brains than his own cane ; and that with the exception of his knowledge of bull-baiting—a sport of which he is passionately fond —he is as ignorant as any Monk that ever wore a cowl. Such a man is no more fit to appear as a Diplomatist, at the Court of LOUIS PHILIPPE, than he would be to fill the office of President of the United States. The Princess, his wife is however a woman of haughty and imperious temper, and well qualified to conduct any intrigue. Her timely in terference saved the Crown from falling into the han i of Don CA RLOS at the death of FERD I- Ist,,Er,--- and since that time she has greatly for -4are.4,t.) -- e Constitutional cause, thou g h f or some itioriths',:`e terms bordering on estrangeme n t w i t h , , hei-sistei tii 1 QUEEN REGENT. It was alleg e d th at I ' L she wished to procure the nominal Regency:for her husband, knowing that upon her would really devolve its honours and its duties ; but we could never dis cover in her conduct any reasonable grounds for such a suspicion. If, therefore, the Government send the Infant Don FRANCISCO to Paris, it must entrust the Princess with its mission, if it hope to have it properly executed. Perhaps it is found that her presence in the Spanish capital threatens the adjustment of the Con stitutional Reforms which the Cortes have in contem plation, whereas at Paris her influence would be next to nothing. But upon this question we only hazard conjectures. The rumour upon which they rest may eventually prove unfounded. Ministers will take no important step without consulting the Cortes ; and we have unbounded reliance in the wisdom and patriotism of that body. The whole of the Paris journals of Thursday have been received. The Princess MARY of Orleans failed in making an impression upon the Royal heart of her Cousin the King of NAPLES, as the papers be fore us state his MAJESTY has formally sought and obtained the hand of the Archduchess THERESA, niece of the Emperor of AUSTRIA, and daughter of the Archduke CHARLES. The betrothal will take place in January, when his Neapolitan MAJESTY will be represented by his man-of-all-work, the Duke of SALERNO. As was stated yesterday, Prince Louis NAPO LEON Will be shipped off to the United States without trial. His mother, the Duchess of ST. LEu, has obtained permission to remain in Paris. The Swiss question is regarded as settled by the French journals. Our Correspondent at Portsmouth has forwarded to us advices from San Sebastian up to the afternoon of Tuesday, the Bth instant. From the heavy connonade then heard in the direction of Bilboa, it was concluded by the passengers on board the Swallow schooner— which left San Sebastian on that day—that the Carlists had re-commenced the siege of that city ; but such intelligence is little to be relied upon, although not unlikely inasmuch as Don CARLOS declared that the siege would be re newed as soon as VILLAREAL could get rid of Es- PARTERO. ThP blockade of the river is somewhat improbable, especially as Lord JOIIN HAY had orders to keep the communication by the river open, cost what it would. We regret to learn that no successful effort has vet been made to provide permanently for the wants of the British Legion. San Sebastian is one of the four keys of the Spanish kingdom, and yet the brave foreigners who have so nobly kept it for the QUEEN, arc suffered to want the commonest necessaries of human subsistence. The other keys of the kingdom are Pollyanna, Barcelona, and Figueras—cvery one of which would have been in possession of Don CARLOS, but fur the valour of the British auxiliaries by sea and land. The Spanish Government appears not sufficiently sensible of the importance of the ser 7 ices rendered it by the Legion, or it dangerously mis calculates the extent of its endurance of neglect. In a lung-winded article, de omnibus rebus el quibus clam aliis, which a Morning Cotemporary puts forth, we have been amused with a more than ordinary defiance of truth, and dereliction of principle. It appears, too, as if the '' tremendous monosyllable" had lost its little remains of temper and prudence, and had given itself up entirely to the natural waywardness and malignity of its disposition. Whether the unexpected result of the Municipal elections, so often the subject of its pro phetic lucubrations, and the consequent disappoint ment to its hopes of ever again being on good terms with the occupants of the Treasury Bench, unless by a " turn about, wheel about" process, similar to its last escapade, have rendered it utterly reckless and des perate, we leave to others to determine. But reck less and desperate it has become, frothing away with a rage truly ludicrous at everything which it lately hugged to its bosom, and hugging all that formerly called forth either its bitterest hatred or its loathing. The Whigs, because they have stuck to the principles which it has deserted, are abused and vilified with that peculiar inveteracy which an apostate proverbially entertains towards his former as sociates ; while the Tories, who, a little while ago, were the " scotched and writhing dragons of the oli garchy," are now angels in human form. There is, however, we are bound to say, in the ar ticle before us, one exception from the general rule of inconsistency and tergiversation, followed by the Print to which we allude. On the subject of the new Poor Law, it has been consistent. It conceived a mortal antipathy to the measure, because it was proposed by Lord BROUGHAM, and was likely to prove beneficial to the country ; and its hostility has increased, exactly in proportion as the proofs of this benefit have been multiplied. Some half-dozen select vestrymen—would be-great men in their own parish—topping fellows in their own conceit—find the new law reduces them to their native insignificance. Their vanity is mortified, and they get up a petition, setting forth numberless imaginary hardships inflicted on the poor ; which peti tion, after the spelling has been corrected, is published in the Times, and it is immediately announced that " not a parish can meet without denouncing the atro cities" of the Poor Law. Letters from the same dis appointed individuals, or others of a similar stamp, are sent to Printing House-square, and " not a pos arrives that does not cover our table with the most affecting illustrations of its barbarity." If a single beggar shows his face in the Metropolis, " not a street can we walk in without beholding the proofs of its demoralizing provisions ;" and to sum up all, it has in its possession illustrations of these and a multitude of other atrocious effects produced by this law, which would occupy its " entire columns for nearly a month to come !"—thirty octavo volumes (according to its own calculation) of Poor Law grievances ! Fortunately, however, the public do not form their opinions on this subject from anything that our Con temporary says about it. The malevolence of feeling, and the mad party spirit which it has mixed up with a question, which every one must allow had no natural tendency to excite such feelings, and which ought to have been discussed, if any ought, with calmness and impartiality, have deprived the statements of the Times of all claim to belief. Every new Union that is formed bears testimony to the excellent working of the improved system. Not only arc the poor better clothed and fed than they were under the former plan—not only are their physical wants better supplied—but what even the most sanguine advocates of the Poor Law Amendment Act could not have anticipated at so early a period of its operation a. sensible improvement in the morals of the poor has already taken place in those districts where it has been introduced. A very striking illustration of this important and highly gratifying result will be found in our paper of this day, in a report from the Epping Union to the Secretary of State for the Home Department. Let those whose feelings have been led astray by false representations about imprisonment, short allowance, cruelty to the aged and infirm, sepa ration of man and wife, and the like topics of decla mation, read this report, and they will be convinced of the salutary working of the New Poor Law. Mr. ENEAS MACDONNELL, as we perceive by the Times of this morning, has thought fit to renew his attacks on Mr. O'CONNELL. We c annot com pliment the the Pius jEneas on his feeling or delicacy in selecting such a moment for the discharge of his personal spleen. We should have thought that the heavy affliction under which the Hon. and Learned Member for Kilkenny now labours, would have wholly disarmed, or, at any rate, mitigated the bitterness of political animosity ; that when the object of enmity lay prostrate and defenceless under the chastening visita tion of Providence, the uplifted' dagger would have been suspended ; but Mr. MACDONNELL, loftily su perior to every touch of humanity, stoically regard less of every generous emotion, has taught us that then is the time to plunge the weapon deep into the heart's core. This gentleman was once the friend of Mr. O'CONNELL. They had carried on the struggle for Emancipation together ; each had wit nessed and encouraged the efforts of the other to benefit their common country ; each taken his share in the perils of a perilous season ; and these recollections, we should have supposed, would have been uppermost in Mr. MACDONNELL'S mind at a period like the present. " Auld lang sync" is a strong plea, and rarely fails to reaeh the generous heart. But here it would seem to be utterly power less. No " compunctious visitings" of nature touch the:singularly constituted ENEAS ; no softening memo ries of the past " disturb his soul with pity ;" he allows of no pause in his hostility ; he sees—he bears in mind only that Mr. O'CONNELL is sore afflicted in spirit ; and that this therefore is precisely the time to make his blow tell. When JOHNSON praised a certain in dividual for being a " good hater," he meant to say, that he hated like a man, not like a fiend ; had he sup posed him capable of venting his rancour, MACDON NELL fashion, he would have held him in disgust and horror. We trust the pious ENEAS will give us no more of his du 11, disgusting malignity. He has al ready convinced us that he is a bore of the first water; and having now convinced us, in addition, that his heart is on a par with his head, we can dispense with the exhibition of any further qualifications. We beg to direct the attention of the Spanish Fund holders to the declaration of the Spanish Ambassador at Paris respecting the debt, which we have copied into another part of The Sun. It appeared in the offi cial part of the Moniteur of Thursday. We beg leave to direct attention to the intelligence which will be found in another column, under the head " Ireland." The demand upon the banks for gold— and Mr. O'LournEN's reported refusal to accept the Puisne Judgeship— possess a more than ordinary de gree of interest. CHANCERY COURT.-(THIS DAY.) SENDING THREATENING LETTERS TO A., MASTER IN CHANCERY. IN THE MATTER OF THE LUDLOW CHARITY. Mr. MAuLE, of the Common Law Bar, upon his Lord ship taking his seat, requested permission to mention the case of the Ludlow Charity, in which our readers will re collect a letter had been sent from a gentleman at the Bar to Master Brougham, containing insinuations and threats, for the purpose of inducing the Master to come to a dif ferent decision from that which he had been sup posed to have done. The Learned Counsel stated that his Lordship had directed a communication to be made to the Solicitors and Town Council of Ludlow, relative to a letter which had been written by a gentleman at tine Bar to a Master of this Court. The Town Council understand that that communication was intended by your Lordship to require an answer from them, and they think it most respectful to return that answer to your Lord ship in Court by their Counsel. Upon receiving that letter, of which a copy was contained in that communication, the first object of the Town-council was to inquire whether it was really written by the gentleman by whom it purports to be written. It turns out that it was actually written by him, and that being so, the Town Council then consulted their Counsel, the Learned Recorder and myself, whether they would institute any proceedings on the subject. Undoubtedly the letter does contain some scandalous imputations against the Town Council and against the gentlemen who have acted as their legal advisers, imputations which will form the ground of proceedings either here or elsewhere on the part of the Town Council ; but when they look at the letter in its more important aspect, they consider that any private ground of complaint which they have is altogether merged in public consideration, for the letter unquestionably amounts to a gross insult to a high judicial officer in the exercise of his duty, and an attempt to impede the proper course of justice. It unquestionably is a case of great pub lic concern. It is one, however, in which the Town Council have no private interest, any more than the rest of the public. They are disposed, therefore, to waive all con siderations relating personally to themselves, and not to in stitute, either here or elsewhere, any proceeding against the gentleman in question ; and they are the rather disposed to do that, because they consider that the proper course has already been initiated by the learned person to whom the letter was addressed having placed it in your Lordship's hands ; and they are well satisfied that your Lordship's wisdom and justice will be able to discern and execute whatever the interests of the public require to be done in this most important case, and that your Lordship will be able to do whatever may be necessary to prevent in future such an attempt to impede the course of justice, and vindi cate the offended dignity of the Court. The LORD CHANCELLOR—I thought it right, as the letter which I mentioned in Court on Monday last, not only affected the general administration of justice, but affecting particularly those who are parties litigant in the proceed ings before the Master, which gave rise to this letter, that they should in the first instance be informed of what had taken place, it being a part—a small part, indeed, considering the terms in which this letter is couched—but it being a part of the offence to endeavour in any way to communicate with a Judge, or any one exercising judicial functions, in' the absence or behind the back of the parties litigant. From the parties to whom I directed that communication to be made I have now received the answer from the Bar ; one other party, to whom similar communications were made, have, through my officer, just put into my hands a letter, in which he states that he has not yet received any instruction from Mr. Morris, of Ludlow, as to any proceed ing which they nay or may not think proper to take, in consequence of this letter. It would, therefore, be incon sistent with the course I prescribed to myself on Monday last, until that communication has been made to me, to adopt any course which it may be my duty hereafter to take, if parties exercising the same discretion which has been exercised in this case, which has already been represented by Counsel to me, leaving the matter finally in my hands, if I did anything at the present moment. I am, therefore, under the necessity of post poning the matter till Tuesday next, by which time I shall desire that I may be at all events furnished with an answer to the communication I have directed to be made. A case not very dissimilar from the present, at least raising the principle undoubtedly upon which I should feel myself authorised to act, occurred in the time of my Lord Hardwicke. In that instance a letter was sent by a party litigant to his Lordship, inclosing a 20/. bank note. The course his Lordship took was to make an order nisi, calling upon the party who appeared to be the writer of that letter to show cause why he should not be committed for a contempt. That was the mode in which Lord Hard wicke brought the subject under the jurisdiction of the Court. There can be no difficulty, therefore, in point of form or precedent, in bringing this matter under the cognizance of the Court, so as to enable me to deal with it as for a contempt. But I have serious doubts whether, considering the magnitude of this offence, that will be an adequate protection for the future to those who are parties litigant in courts of justice. My present impres- sion, however, is, that it will be my duty to put this into a course of investigation under the criminal jurisdiction of the county ; and the only doubt I have as to the propriety of doing so is,that I have duties to perform, not only to hold 'out to parties in future the criminality of proceeding to endeavour to influence persons entrusted with the• administration of justice—but also to ensure the due prosecution of proceeding before the Master. Whether that will be attained by putting this letter into the hands of the Attorney-General, or whether it may not be necessary for me to adopt other proceedings for the purpose of pre venting the interruption of the administration of justice in this particular case, which this letter is calculated to pro duce, I shall take into consideration between this and Tues day next, on which day I shall finally dispose of the case. His Lordship rose at two o'clock to attend the selection of Sheriffs in the Court of Exchequer. ROLLS' COURT.-(THIS DAY.) VERNON V. VERNON. This case came on upon demurrer. The bill was filed by Mr. Justinian Vernon against John Vernon, his father, and Messrs. Frazer and Co., merchants. Frazer and Co. were charged with an estate in the island of St. Vincent, called Mustique. The owner of the plantation was a gen tleman of the name of Punnett. Frazer and Co. lodged a claim for the compensation money awarded in respect of the slaves upon the estate, and a counter claim was lodged by the plaintiff, Mr. Vernon, and the defendant, John Ver- non, his father. The object of the bill was to have it de clared that the compensation money awarded in respect of the slaves belonged to the Vernons, and did not belong to Punnett or Frazer and Co. The slaves were originally found in the Island of Antigua, upon an estate called Ver nons. They were then removed to a plantation called Hawks bill, which belonged to a Mr. Casmajor, from whence they were removed to Mustique, in St. Vincent, belonging to Mr. Punnett, who mortgaged them to Frazer and Co. The bill alleged that in August 1765, Mr. John Vernon, by will, devised all his estates in Antigua, with the negroes, stock, and crops, to his son, James Vernon, for life, under whom the plaintiff claims. At the time when the testator made his will, the plantation in the island of Antigua was leased for a term of fourteen years to a Mr. Duncan Grant. To that lease there was a schedule annexed, containing an ac count of the number of slaves on the property, and the im plements, &c., necessary for the cultivation of the estate, which John Vernon devised to Casmajor. The bill also alleged that previous to the execution of this lease, Mr. Casmajor removed forty-nine of the slaves from the estate of Vernons to Hawksbill, which subsequently came into the possession of Messrs. Frazer and Co. Messrs. Frazer and Co. had put in a general demurrer, for want of equity, and also for want of parties, Punnett not being made a party to the sale. Mr. PEMBERTON and Mr. LEWIS appeared in support of the demurrer, aid contended that there having been an adverse title for forty years, that the slaves having been found duly registered in the island of Antigua, that no notice having been to Messrs. Frazer and Co. of their re moval, and no sufficient title being shown by the plaintiff in the original transaction, the demurrer must be allowed. Mr. KINDERSLEY appeared in support of the bill. The plaintiff was tenant in tail in remainder, under a settle ment of real estate. The defendants had got possession of that real estate, which, by the Act of the Legislature, had been converted into personalty. The Learned Gentleman, therefore, submitted that though they could not get back the real estate in specie, it was inequitable that the defend ants should take money which had been awarded to his client, which the defendants had got into their possession wrongfully. Mr. PEMBERTON having replied, The MASTER OF THE ROLLS said he conceived the plain tiff hail not made out a sufficient title, and therefore the demurrer must be allowed. KING'S BENCH.-(THIS DAY.) (Sittings in Banco.) THE RING V. WILLIAM FRIPP, ESQ., MAYOR OF BRISTOL. Sir FREDERICK PoLLocK appeared to show cause against a rule obtained in this case by the Attorney-General cal ling upon the defendant to show cause why an information in the nature of a quo warranto should not be exhibited against him, to show by what authority he claims to be Mayor and an Alderman of the city of Bristol, and of the county of the same city. The grounds upon which the rule had been obtained were, that the defendant was not en titled to be upon the burgess roll of the said borough, and that he was not the occupier of any shop, warehouuse, counting-house, or dwelling-house, and had not paid rates within the meaning of the 9th section of the Act sth and 6th of his present Majesty's reign. On the occasion of the revision of the burgess lists the name of the defendant was ob jected to, but after a full investigation the Revising Barrister decided that his name should be retained upon the list. His (Sir F. Pollock's) answer to the application was two fold—first, that the question of the right of the defendant to have his name upon the Burgess list could not be raised by the present motion ; and secondly, even if there was that right, Mr. Fripp's name was properly on the list. He con tended that their Lordships could not be called upon to sit as a Court of Appeal, from the decision of the Revising Barristers ; and even if they were, they would find that the decision come to in Mr. Fripp's case was correct. The first point was, in his opinion, of infinitely mere importance than the other, before it interfered with the decision which a Court of competent jurisdiction, appointed by the law for that purpose, had already pronounced. He would now call the attention of the Court to the various clauses of the Act, and they would at once perceive that if the name of a party was admitted upon the Burgess roll, his right was undoubted and indefeasible for one year. The objection in the present case arose out of the 28th section, which enacted " that no person shall be qualified to be a Town Councillor or Alderman, who shall not be entitled to be upon the burgess roll of such borough." After reciting the provisions of some other clauses, the Learned Counsel observed, that it was impossible to read any mo dern Act of Parliament without perceiving a certain laxity of expression, arising perhaps from a horror of tautology, and hence they found the words " entitled to," " quali fied," " having a right," and " being upon the burgess roll," used in one clause or another, but all evidently with the same meaning. His proposition, therefore, might be summed up in these words—that the 9th section provided who should be burgesses—the 15th provided for the making out of the lists—the 18th appointed a Court to revise these lists—and the 22d having dir Acted these revised lists to be handed over to the town clerk, enacted that these lists shall be the burgess-roll of that borough for that year, and from none of these points could he be removed. It was therefore, he must say, a quibble in his Learned Friend to say—it is true you are in the burgess-roll, and are entitled to vote, but you are not entitled to be upon the burgess-roll. The Court could not carp at particular phrases, or make such nice distinctions, inasmuch as the Act of Parliament made no distinction between being on the burgess-roll for one purpose and not for another. An objection had been taken to the residence, and also to the defendant's not being individually on the rate, lie being one of the shareholders of the Bristol Fire Office, in the name of which the rate was made ; but their Lord ships were aware that in all cases of joint occupancy, where the value of the premises was sufficient to give a qualifica tion to each, the claim was perfectly valid. He would conclude by observing, that a case of more importance with regard to the peace of the Municipal Corporations, and the time of that Court and the expense of liti g ation to the parties, had not come under his observation for some time. Sir WILLIAM FOLLETT and Mr. WIGIITMAN followed on the same side. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, in support of the rule, corn tended that that Court had jurisdiction to revise the deci• sions of the Revising Barristers, and cited several authori. ties in support of that view of the case. There was a Bil introduced into the House of Commons during the last Session of Parliament— Sir F. POLLOCK objected to that line of argument. His Learned Friend had no right to allude to Bills which his Majesty's Law Officers might hare thought proper to in troduce. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL contended that he had a per fect right to do so. He had never in the discharge of his professional duties made any personal or party references, but it was perfectly competent to him to refer to any Bill quantum valeat. Sir F. PotLocx—l must protest against it. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL—That is the second time my Learned Friend has objected. The thing is matter of history. Lord DENMAN—What history do you find it in, Mr. Attorney ? The ATTORNEY-GENERAL--My Lord, I find it in Han sard's Parliamentary History.—(Much laughter.) The Learned Counsel then proceeded at some length to contend that the name of the defendant had been improperly placed upon the list, inasmuch as his name was not found upon the borough rate ; nor could it be said that his being a share holder in a Company which had an office in the borough would establish an pccupency within the terms of the Act. Mr. AUSTIN followed on the same side, and the Court having conferred together, Lord DENMAN said if the Learned Counsel who had shown cause against the rule were right in saying that the burgess list was binding, it was quite fit that the Court should give a distinet opinion upon that subject ; but they could not say that they were sufficiently satisfied to give an opinion upon it. Still even if that were the case, much remained behind, and the Court felt it necessary to take time before giving its opinion.—Judgment deferred. BAIL COURT. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE sat in this Court this morning for the purpose of hearing motions. BOROUGH OF CARNARVON. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL applied to the Court to grant a writ of quo warranto, directed to Morgan, the Mayor of the Borough of Carnarvon, to show by what authority he held and exercised that office. It appeared from the affidavits in support of the application that there were a variety of grounds for impeaching the title of the Mayor, and also of the Court of Aldermen, and writs of quo warranto had been granted by the Court of King's Bench against the late Mayor and Aldermen. As the election of the present Mayor took place under precisely similar circumstances to that of his predecessor, he (the Attorney-General) trusted the Court would grant the pre sent application. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE—You have stated sufficient— take your writ. THE TURF.-- , WHITEHEAD, GENT., V. COLEMAN. Mr. MARTIN showed cause against a rule obtained by Mr. Wilson on Saturday last, to set, aside proceedings in this case, on the ground that although two actions had been commenced, only one cause of action existed. The Learned Counsel said, that from the affidavits on the part of the plaintiff, it appeared that there really did exist two distinct causes of action ; the defendant's horses, Turfcutter and Amadon, being entered for separate races, the one being for a purse of 50 sovereigns, and the other for a gold cup, where there were sixty subscribers, stakes 101. Toe special pleader, by whom the declaration was drawn, had made a mistake in the pleadings which gave rise to the motion of his Learned Friend. Under the circumstances he trusted that his Lordship would discharge the rule. Mr. WILSON having been heard in reply, Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE directed the rule to be dis charged, but without costs. COMMON PLEA.S.-(THIS DAY.) BILLINGS V. AMBRIDGE. Mr. THEssioEa said that this was an action for an as sault to which there was merely a plea of " Not Guilty." The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff for 151., and he now appeared to move for a new trial upon affidavits relating to matters which had been disclosed since the trial. The case was proved on the part of the plaintiff by one witness of the name of John Colman, who described himself as an engraver, residing in Windsor -terrace, City-road, where he said he had lived and carried on his business for four years, and he described certainly a very violent assault to havo taken place. He said that the plaintiff, being a tenant of the defendant, and being in arrear for rent, and a distress having been put into his house by the defendant, he (the witness) went with the plaintiff on the day of the assault, to ask the defendant to make some arrangement, in order to save the expense of the distress. They met the defendant ; some conversation took place, and the plaintiff entreated that some arrangement might take place, to which the de fendant replied, that the only arrangement he would make was by beating the plaintiff, and punching his Lead ; and the defendant upon this pulled out a handful of sovereigns, and said that he would give them to the plaintiff, if he would allow him to beat him for an hour ; and that the defendant immediately collared the plaintiff, struck him violently on the eyes, gave him two black eyes, a bloody nose, knocked him down, kicked him when down, and hit him over the forehead. All this evidence came upon them with a very great deal of surprise, the defendant denying that any assault had been committed. He cross-examined the witness, and obtained information of his residence, and then asked him whether he was not a person who was in the habit of becoming bail ? The answer was " No, he had never been bail more than twice in his life, and one of these for his brother." He said he saw the black eyes very clearly, and that there remained marks on the plaintiff for some time. He (Mr. Thessiger) had a witness in the Court, the daughter of the defendant, who would prove that she saw the parties meet, but that she saw no blows struck. But this was merely negative evidence against the positive evidence of Colman, on which the Learned Judge, before whom the case was tried, Mr. Justice Parke, said that he (Mr.Thessiger) had better exercise his own judgment and good sense, and accordingly he, Mr. Thessiger, merely addressed the jury on the impro bability of the story of the witness, who stated that eight or nine persons had come to the spot, attracted by the vio lence of the plaintiff. The Learned Judge said that he (Mr. Thesiger) had acted very discreetly in not calling his witness ; the impression on the minds of the jury was con siderably strengthened by the summing up of the evidence, and the Jury very properly, according to the evidence be fore them, found a verdict for the plaintiff, with 151. da mages. Immediately after the trial, the defendant, who had never seen this witness before, and who was satisfied that the whole of his evidence was a falsehood, requested his attorney to make enquiries. The attorney went ac cordingly to Windsor-terrace, City-road, a place con taining 50 houses ; he enquired at every house, with the exception of one that was untenanted, and he could not hear of any person of the name of the witness Colman. He inquired of the tax-gatherer, but even he had never heard of it. He inquired amongst the neighbours with regard to the appearance of the plaintiff after the supposed violence that was offered to his person, and they stated that they had seen him continually for three months (the assault was stated to have been committed on the 29th of August), and that they had never seen the slightest appearance of black eyes. He had an affidavit of the defendant, which positively denied that any assault had been committed ; he had the affidavit of the daughter of the defendant, who stated that she saw the plaintiff and the difendant meet and separate, and that no blows were struck ; and that she had never seen the witness Colman, or any other person, with the plaintiff when he met the defendant. CHIEF JUSTICE—Does she speak to the same time Mr. THESSIGER—Oh yes, there was no doubt about it. The defendant, when the writ was served upon him, was so utterly ignorant of the assault, that he thought it must be from sonic irregularity in the distress, and he so instructed his attorney. He did not know the cause of the action, and the defendant's attorney applied to the plaintiff's attor ney to know the cause. He had also searched the filacer's book, and there found that the witness Colman was described as having offered for bail four different times—cer tainly not for his brother—and that on one occasion, viz., the 2d of December, 1833, his bail was rejected, and a few days afterwards, he was found offering for bail for 1461. This was a very serious matter, because if these affi davits were true, it was clear that the grossest perjury had been committed. They, (the defendant's council) were so taken by surprise, that they were not at all prepared to meet the evidence of this person. They had had no opportunity of making inquiry, and it was only accidentally in the pro gress of the trial, that he obtained materials for cross-exa mining the witness. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE said he would look over the affidavits, and speak to the Learned Judge before whom the case was tried. THAMES V. NETTER. The COURT was occupied up to the time our Reporter left with this case, which was of no public interest. COURT OF REVIEW.-(THIS DAY., EX PARTE KNIGHT IN RE WATKINS. When this case was called on, Mr. RUSSELL, Counsel for Mr. Knight, said, that having read over the affidavits filed in this matter, since the Court refused to postpone the hearing, he had no hesitation in saying that special circum stances had arisen which would induce them to alter that decision, for either in the Court of Bankruptcy, or else where, he had never seen affidavits of so scandalous a nature, and which therefore would more require an answer from the other side. Mr. SWANSTON, contra, was of opinion that this was a manoeuvre to postpone the hearing of the petition. Mr. BETHEL, on the same side as Mr. Russell, assured Mr. Swanston it was no such thing, and he could not help characterising the affidavits as a deliberate and scandalous abuse of the practice of the Court. Mr. SWANSTON could not be accountable for the ex pressions in the affidavits. Mr. BETHEL—Yes, but you are accountable for your own. The COURT ordered areference to the register, to examine the affidavits, and report de die in diem, Mr. Russell's client paying the costs of the day. Several cases were postponed at the request of Counsel, the parties not being prepared to go on. EXCHEQUER COURT.-(THIS DAY.) FLEMING V. HECTOR, M.P.---ADAMS V. O'BRIEN, IMP.---AND _ . ADAMS V. RIPPON, M.P. - These were actions brought by tradesmen who had sup plied the late Westminster Reform Club with goods of va rious sorts, against the defendants as individual members thereof. The actions were tried before two of the Learned Barons of the Court, when verdicts were returned for the plaintiffs, but the question of the liability of the defendants was reserved for the opinion of the Court. Rules nisi for a nonsuit have been argued yesterday and to-day, when the Court gave judgment. The LORD CHIEF BARON said, when the cases were before him at Guildford he was inclined to think that the defendants were liable, but as the point was involved in considerable doubtlhe had given leave to move for a non suit. This association was different in its facts from any of the cases of partnership which had been cited. They were all partnerships for profit and loss. This was a question of principal and agent. For instance, no member of a club could bind his brother members by accepting a bill, though it was for the benefit of the Club. The rules which constituted the Society were binding, and they by implication withheld any power from the Committee to contract any credit. They said that no person could be a member until he had paid his admission fees, and the subscription for the current year : that was to constitute a fund to carry on the affairs of the Club. But, as if even this was not enough, they laid down a clear rule, that if a member had any re freshment—if he called for an ice, or a bottle of soda-water, the steward was to take ready money for it. From all these circumstances, it was clear that the constitution of the Club was, that credit should neither be taken nor given. The Committee, when they found their funds begin to run short, ought to have called a general meeting of the Club, and have made their statement, and asked for more money. They had no right to pledge either their own credit, or that of the members of the Club. For these reasons, he was of opinion that in all the cases the rules for a nonsuit must be made absolute. The other Judges delivered their opinions, which were in concurrence with that of Lord Abingcr. Rules made absolute accordingly. The COURT then rose for the purpose of preparing for the Reception of the Privy Council and the Judges, who, according to custom, come into this Court to report the names of those gentlemen who have been nominated to fill the office of High Sheriff for the ensuing year. Shortly after two o'clock the Chancellor of the Exche quer, the Lord Chancellor, Vice Chancellor, the Marquis of Lansdowne, and other Privy Councillors, took their seats on the Bench, and proceeded with the business. In the course of the last month 21 bodies were con veyed to the Morgue —namely, 15 men, 4 women, 2 chil dren and a foetus. Five or six of the individuals whose re mains had been deposited in this receptacle for the ob scure or unknown departed appear to have died a natural death.—National. FOREIGN TNT ELLIGENCE. FRANCE. PARIS, Nov. 10.—We have the following letter from Bayonne of the 6th Nov.—" We have nothing, absolutely nothing, respecting Bilboa ; for I do not depend on the cor rectness of some letters from the environs, which say that in consequence of the retreat of Espartero towards Vittoria , the Carlists had recommenced their attacks on the 4th (St. Charles's day.) It has also been attempted to make us believe this morning, by letters from St. Sebastian, that the mail from Bilboa had arrived ; but we soon discovered that it was the complement of the apocryphal report of .Aranz, by which it was attempted to persuade us that the siege was raised—it is no such thing. The famous Mendez Vigo has put himself at the head of a republican guerilla, with which he scours Estremadura. Cantavieja has, in fact, been occupied by the Q ueen's troops, commanded by Evariste San Miguel ; but the gar rison and the inhabitants had previously quitted the town, carrying away everything that was moveable. They, howe ver, left behind some hundred prisoners. They have thus acknowledged that they were not in a condition to hold out a regular siege, in a place which they were said to have put in a formidable state of defence." A journal again affirms this morning that the attempts at Strasburg and Vendome, compared with some other sytor toms of agitation in different regiments, have manifested the necessity of confiding the direction of the army to a firmer, and more experienced hand, than that of General Bernard. The garrison of Paris is to be augmented by two regi" ments of infantry. The 10th of the line bast just received orders to come from Soisson to the capital. Lieut.-General Oubieres leaves the command of the corps occupying Ancona, where he will be immediately suc ceeded by Gen. Gazan.—Journal du Commerce, Nov. 10, 2d edition. La Cita?* says that there is not a syllable of truth in the story given in the Allgeineine Zeitung, of the congratu lations sent by the Republic of San Marino to liinglouis Philip, and his answer, in which he is said to demand the expulsion of eight refugees. FRENCH FUNDS.-Paals, Nov. 10. Five per Cents., 105 f. 65c. 70e. Four and a Half ner Cents. 100 f. 90c. Four per Cents., 99f. Three per Cents., 78f. 90c. 79f. itente de Naples, 98f. 97f. 90c. 981'. Roman Five per Cents., 99%%. Spanish Actives, 20y04 LA lA. Spanish Differes, Spanish Passives. 55 t . Belgian Loan, Five per Cents., 101 100 U%. Portuguese Loan, Five per Cents., 52U. Portuguese Loan, Three per Cents, 3534. EXCHANGE ON LONDON. One month, paper, 25c. 30c.; money, 25f. 2714 c. Three months, paper, 25f. sc. ; money, -f. -c. Authentiaue. le BOURSE, QUARTER TO FOUR.-The p r i ces o f Conso... Of Tuesday occasioned a further depression in the French Rata:. The first price of the Th ree p er C ents . was 7 9 1. ; they we"' afterwards done at 791. 5c., and again at 79f., sellerls. h The French holders of Spani s h St oc k did not re lish much the new mode of paying the dividends proposed by M. pani puzano in the Moniteur of Th urs d a y, an d t h e A ct i ves fell eon' sentiently to 204, sellers. The Carlists reported that Villareal, having vainly offer ed battle to Espartero, had left 5,000 men to keep the Christie _ General in check, and m arc h e d b ac k w i t h the rest of his fo rces against Bilboa, which was said to be again closely invested. s LAST PRICES.-Five per Cents., 105 f. 95c. ; Thre per Cents., 79f. sc. ; Five per Cents. Spanish, -; Three per Cents. Spanish, -; Cortes, -; Coupons, - GuC hards, -; Differes, 84 ; New Loan, -; Activeg, 20,1: gives, Si ; Ducats, 98 25 ; Romans, 99a ; Pedros, 52 Belgians, 1001; Dutch, ; Ilaytians, -c. ; guels, 14; Brabant Bank, -; Belgian Bank, 26; tinuation, -c. ; New Differes, 84 ; Five per Cent. Pe r l: - tuelles, -; Royal Loan, -; Three per Cent. Portuguese, Sje THE NEW POOR LAW. REPORT FROM THE EPPING UNION TO THE SECRETA-RY Of STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT, AS TO THE EFFEC T OF THE NEW POOR LAW.—NOV. 8, 1836. of The Union was f orme d by Alf re d P ower, E sq., one, the Assistant Poor L aw C omm i ss i oners , on t h e 1 4th W l ' of February, in the present year. It consists of eighte en parishes, the population of which, according t o t h e cens° l l of 1831, is 15,091. Several o f th e par i s h es are purely agricultural ; and they were, a t th e f ormat i on o f t h e Vril ° l in a most depra ve d s t a t e o f p auper i sm ; as a pro of 0 0 which we can state, that at the meeting of the board, ° the 15th day of April, a ppli ca ti ons were ma d e f ro m °' 0 parish alone, with a population of only 621, by ten able bodied paupers, mostly young men, either for work or P e " cuniary relief. These men had been in the habit of re. ceiving when at work a certain small sum from their el f ' ployers, the deficiency being made up from the poor-rates; and, what may appear almost incredible, the parish ante to labourers out or work, in several instances, equal to the average rate of wages given to men in employ. Now, as a proof of the admirable working of the ri ePr system, there have been, sines the formation of the Va' °e c i but very few able-bodied labourers in our workhouses , a ° ,,, most of those f or a very s h ort per i od. In short, the work' mill, whi c h was p urc h ase d i n t h e month of Apr il, h as ground only six quarters and three bushels of corn, and now almost useless, th ere b e i ng on l y one a b le-bodie d 1 $ bourer in the house. As regards saving to the rate-payers, the average an.ons i expenditure of th e e i g ht een par i s h es, f or the three years preceding the formation of the Union, was 9,4141. ; and the total expenditure of the Union, for the last two quart erst was 2,8231. s s . 6id., s h ow i ng a mater i a l re d uct i on i n the rates, although it has been found necessary to e..iPenci a considerable sum in erecting a mill, purchasing of clothes, and repairing the old workhouses. It is a great gratification to us to be enabled to inff l l your Lordship that thi s sav i ng h as b een effected witt-, diminishing the com f or t s o f th e age d or afflicted, es have scarcely in any one instance reduced the o ut-br a allowance to p au p ers o f thi s d escr i pt i on ; an d we cowl produce instances in which the aged and infirm are reeel y l. ing a larger a ll owance th an prev i ous l y to t h e f orma tion ° f this Union, or under the old system. It is not solely on account of the savings in the P° er ; rates that we hail the New Poor-law Amendment Act as s great legislative good to th e coun t ry at l arge, b u t becau a . it provides against th a t d emo l ar i s i ng pract i ce o f g rant'na out-door relief to able-bodied men, which under the system was a direct en couragemen t t o idl eness, and a o rl e b t ; nual reliance on the p a ri s h f or re li e f, rat h er than uP°ll exertions of their own industry. We should not at this period have considered ourselve! called upon to intrude up on y our L or d s hi p ' s atten tion a ny remarks relative to thi s U n i on , did we not consider a,_ 00 public duty to thw ar t as muc h as li es i n our power the_ o f efforts of those who, f rom mo ti ves b est k nown to theinof selves, are endeavouring to bring into disrepute an Ac t the Legislature whi c h we are conv i nce d , if f u ll y carried rnto effect, must prove a great blessing to the community. SHIPPING.--(THIS DAY.) (FROM LLOYD 'S.) DEAL, Nov. 11.—Wind S. S.E., fine.—Sailed for th e River the Anna, Gilbert, from China ; and Bacchus, pet ite son, from Oporto. Arrived from the River, and remain w i s , the rest of the outward-bound, the Narcissus, Smith, f° di tt o ; maica; Lond on , A nnan , di tto; J o h n P erc h , Ni xo n, i% Castle Lackland, B ruce , di tto ; M ex b oroug h, L e mming te j for Grenada; Barbad oes Pl an t er , A sp il, f or D em erara ; an John, Champlin, for Nassau. Ar- PORTSMOUTH, NOY. 11. —Wind S. S. E. to W. N. W. - rived the Swallow, Adamson, from Santander. A rrived PLYMOUTH, Nov. 10.—Wi n d W. t o W. the Pomona, Lettlewort, from Chesme. Loos , : STANOATE CREEK, N o v. 11.—A rr i ve d th e Titania, mer, from Denia ; and Louisa, Hendrick, from Malaga. THE FUNDS.-(THIS DAY•) CITY, 7' IV EL Yilf 0' CLO Our only arrivals this morning are the French M ails. We stated yesterday that great excitement preva iled in_ Ireland with respect t o mone y a ff a i rs , a nd that specie war being sent to supply the Banks. This appears to be ea firmed this morning by letters from Dublin. 1 of Some sensation was cr ea t e d y es t er day by the ref use. • the Hibernian B an k t o exc h ange th e Ulster Bank no tef It is also stated that the notes of the Belfast Banking C° lll ' . pany were also declined. THE FUNDS. Consols continue in th e same depressed state as till closed at yesterday-87i for the Account ; for next 6o 01 874 ; Money continu es scarce . Exchequer Bills , lid. 03u 2d., 10 discount ; B an k St oc k, 2014 ; India Bonds,2 discount ; India k, 252. In the Foreign Stoc Market, Spanish Active closed at 19, a t present 188 19i ; Passive, 54 ; Deferred, guese, 5 , 11 554 ; Three per Cents., 3 , 1 i. 351. lALF-PA Sr ONE._ Both the British and Foreign Funds were depressed Itu the mo rn ing, since which they have taken a sudden star t • Consols for Money were done at 868, and for Accou% 87 ; after which, went up to 87k -a, at present banks quoted 87k. This rise is attributed to the Irish baneno having weathered the storm, and as a good supply of E no is on its way there, every hope is entertained that on/1 dente will be restored. ' 2d '' Exchequer Bills, lid., 5 disct. ; Exchequer BillsYlndia, 2 dis. ; India Bonds, 1 prem. ; Bank Stock, 1 99 ; 7k ; Portu- Stock, 2521. By the above quotation of Exchequer ish they . have considerably improved since yesterday. SPr 4 i:; Active, 19 1 ; Passive, 5i ; Deferred , 7 i ; Portuguese,,,, ; Three per C en t s , 34i ; C o l um bian, 21i ; Me xican; Dutch two-and-a-half per Cents, 52 -a. We do n o t h ear o f an y further arrivals. There is a re p or t that the interest on Excheque Bil is 15 r to be rai se d t o 2id., which is at the rate of 3} per cebii . THREE O'Ci° Consols for the Account, 87i. -~ ~-`.. THE SUN, LONDON, SATURDAY NOVEMBER 12, 1836.