The Sun. — London, England, 1818-02-05 00:00:00

^-r--~.x ~.. ELECTIONS, Cammittee. , and %Oil - ) was so zealous.;n promoting its objecti,Tthw his losA, he might say in the prime of life, was very Witch to he deplored. 'rite whet- loss Ivas certainly more iu the ordinary' Course of nature. Bot whoever recollected the uniform assiduity, the great experience, and the erdent zeal eviticed by the late. Mr. Rose in his attendance on the Committee, must agree th,it by his dea:h ,t hey had sot ered a great loss, Up ,to the list moment of his lite, his mind was anxious for the interest of his country, especially in those financial and commercial subjects on which his sktll and knowledge were so great. The part which he hAd . takett in promoting those most ad mirable institutions now called icing Banks, won'lo, be an eternal memorial of his ability and activity in foewardiog the best interests of the people._ Mr. CURAVEN.certainly did not intend to oppose the revival of the Committee, though he- was far from expecting any important relief to the coun try, unless there was a complete change, not only in the administration, but iu the whole of the pre sent system of the Poor Laws. If an end was not' put to that system, no radical benefit would be obtained. There was. no subject, however, on which.a greeter difference of opinion existed than -this of the Poor 'Liws. It had "been wittily said of this Committee, that it contained thirty-nine Afferent opinions, be!illes that of the Chairtnan: The (lon Member then 'made some observations . o n the evils prodneed by the Poor Laws. In par ' tic,,r,r, he noticed that the pernicious practice of mixing up the wages of, hbotir with the poor-rates sti:l continued to sueh an extent, that in Many eases the wages were only 911. a day, the rest of I. sum HeCCiSdry for t he Maintenance of the la loonrer being supplied by the parish and paid fur by the Master in the sivipe of Poor-rates. Sir F. IIuaDETT maintdined that the people Were disposed to industry, and felt that spirit of iodepeintence which would Make them prefer to li‘e upon their Own labour than upon the pro p, rty of ilAters. It was idle - 'a complain too of nwsters not giving sufficient wades to their men, be•caase they wtre sure to give' as much as they cook' return in - the sale of their goods. But the fact was those funds which would otherwise be used in , the ,etopioyment of the poor were seized by . the Tax-gatherer. The true source of all the , tells Connected with the Poor Laws was excessive -1 - imiT.ion, thou g h many t;entlenien in thatCouse • did Wit 11Ce to'sayio. How happened it that the system for maintaii,iig the poor which had existed so "long had 41: of a sudden within-Allis year or two been regarded as such an ettormons• evil ?. He re - membered the thee, when he wasia:boy, that the labourers in his father's neighbourhood would wake it their boaSt that they had not been ob liged to apply to the parish for relief ; and so it would be again it the taxes were diminished and the poor could have employment. Reduce the amount of taxation, and it wool(' have more . etleet titan all the enquiries they could make by Coimniftee or any other way. On this subject a delnsiou genet ally existed, which was that the poor ware screened from the burthen,as those things were most taxed which were consumed by the rich, biit it came to the same thing . at last, for if the rich were heavily taxed, they could not - give ettiployment to the poor: He declared, that in bis opinion that tax was best which produced the vgreatest tevenur the least expence of collec tion, barring front this principle the taxes on • iv amps used in legal proceedings, which were ma nifestly oppressive and unjust.' If the House , Was sincerely desirous of improving the condition of the people, let the business be taken up in the way he bad menrioned; but this be could not ex pect, as his. Majesty's Ministers seemed to have forgot that there %Iris such a word as.econonly. Lint CASTLE REAGH said, that the views which the Hon. Baronet took of the policy of the coun try was certainly very different from his own, but that future and more appropriate opportunities would ()cenr for discussing that subject. IVltat be wished on the present occasion was, that the country should not look with the same indifference as the Honourable Baronet to the pr,occedings of this Committee. Nothing could more effectually support the principle of industry than-that sound and proper exercise of the Poor Laws, whirl ) it was the object of this Committee to attain. If that despair which the Honourable Barone; always fe:t as to the state of the country was really founded, he ought to look up to this Committee as that which was likely to pro duce most important benefits. He could not agree with the Hoo. Gentleman (lir. Curwen), who seemed to arlnowledge the truth of the saying, that there were thirty-nine'differeut opinions in the: Committee besides that of the Chairman ; for , the own part he could only say, that he had regtt lady atteiided that Committee, and that he ob served in it as great a concurrence of opinion on the subj:2et to which they directed their attention, as lie had ever observed among the sAttie number ortnen"upon any other subject. He was sure that the Report which they had published was greatly calculated to enlighten the public mind ; and if no further Legislative measures were to be adopt ed, great good had been done by these Reports. _lie hoped that Legislative measures would h e mediately adopted on those points on which the whole . Committee was agreed, without waiting till the Committee should have closed its labours. But ,ivbile he cautioned the House against the gloomy and dishearrening view of the Hon. Ba ronet, yet it was proper to recollect that the ex treme clitfo'culty of the subject .should moderate evravi,gant expectations. Sir FRA N CIS BuanF.TT explained. Mr. CALCRAFT hoped that the Committee would re-consider the question, whether ftwied pro perty should not be made liable to contribute to . the I'6oe-rates. He thought it would be also proper that they should consider the propriety of ikreasing the power of the Vett y Sessions. The Committee was then appointed. WS tars, e. E,l)\ obiaihed leave,bronett it: a ni/1 rci regulate the duration of Polls s at Ge nerdi Llecliou4. lie sta'reit the principal objects of - the Bill t(i be, to enable the returning officers to 'erect wiriiiotil'hoolls—tO enable persons to tote who were otlic.rvVise qualified, though not ti!•s-esseri !or Orr!' land -- tai--vtO prevent the" vcearing 4 , f C , l(kaiieSt4i rilable the returning of to re tufa one member as duty eit:cted, titough a con test was ping on between two others, end, hi case o f the death of a candidate during the con tinuance of the poll, to authorize that a new-poll should be opened. The Bill was read a first and second time. It was then committed, the Report immediately re ceived, and the Bill ordered to be printed. - On the motion of Mr. CURWEN, there vas or dered to be laid betore the Hon;e a return of ali surcharges for assessed taxes made between the sth of April, 1817, and Ist of February. 18113, specifying the particulars and the decisions made by the Commissioners ou eAch case. CNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE. Sir FHANGIs_ BUHDETT presented ti petition from certain inhabitants orliath, praying for annual railiamentS, and that all male persirns, excepting those insane, infants, and criminals, might Lure the right of voting for Members. The petition Was lead and ordered to lie on the table. THE SECRET CONIMITTEE. Mr. BROUGH asked the Noble Lord (Castle reai,h). what would be the, mode of proceeding ro- morrow after Moving for the Committee. He .wished to know whether it was meant to. accede to the proposal of arming that Committee with a power of calling for witnesses and papers—a .power which he understood from the Noble Lord, when he first mentioned the subject, It was to have, and as to which he still felt considerable doubt, in knowing what were the intentions of the Noble Lord. Lord CASTLEREAGH said, his intetrion WRS• to follow the precedent established in all prerions cases of the appointment of such Committees, in none of which any such power lit%d been given. Mr'. BROUGHAM—WouId the Noble Lord then oppose a motion to give a Committee such power ? _ Lord CAsTLERuAGn—He certainly world op pose it: Mr. BROUGHAM---Would the Ballot be moved to-morro kV Lord CASTLEREAGH—It was the uniform prac tice that the Ballot should take place on the &y following that on which the Papers were ordered to be referred to a Secret Committee. Mr. BROUGHAM Said, in that case, be believed AD Hon. Friend of his inte►:dcd to propose that the Committee bhou!d be armed with the powers he had mentioned. li , ►r as he had reason to be lieve that Friday would not he •a day convenient to his Hon. Friend, if the Noble Lord, the Mem ber for Lanai kshire (Lord A. Hamilton), was pre sent, he would have suggested to hin► to .have putt off his motion, ►which stood for Tuesday, in order that his Hon. Friend's- motion respecting the Committee might come on that day. Here the conversation dropped. On the motion at Dr. PHILLIMORE, there was ordered to he l►►id before the House an Account of all Vessels detained as being engaged in the Slave Trade with the Spanish Main, respecting which Appeals had been made, distinguishing the names of the Ships, and the number of Slaves found'on board each. . Mr. Sedeant ONSLOW presented a petition from a peson complaining of certain grievences suffer ed by him in consequence of the proceedings of Ale Commissioners tinder the New Street Act. , Mr. HUSKISSON did not mean to oppose the pe tition, but merely to observe, that there were t.;85:1 grOnnds for complaint, the petitioner cutdd obtain redress in a Court of Law. The petition was read and ordered to lie on the able.—Ad rued. *** The House of Lords did not meet }ester• lay. COURT-MARTIAL. ROYAL MARINES'. At a Court-Martial held at Woolwich, on the 7th January, 1818, and cootiouo by adjourn niimt until the 19th, for trying Brevet Lieutenant- Colonel AB Ell SETH IE, cf the IVoolwich Division of Royal Marines, upon the following charges pre-, 'erred against him by Lientenant-Colonel SAVAGE of the half-pay of the Corps:— • _ " 1. For conduct unbecoming . an] Officer and - a Gentle man, in snaking use of offensive observations in the coursv of conversation with Colonel Savage, in the Marine Library at 'Noolwich,, on or about the 15th of July, 1815,, in the pre sence of Major St rensham, Captain Thomas Clarke, Captain Conully, and other Officers, after repeated intimations from Lieutenant-Colonel Savage, that It he persisted in such ob servations, he, (Lieutenant-Colonel Savage) should he com pelled to notice them for persevering in such oWensive re marks until Lieutenant-Colonel Savage was provoked to call him (Lieuten a nt-Colonel Abernethie) an impertinent fellow, and afterwards to repeat the same." " 2. For asserting, on or about the 11th of December, 1817, a palpable falsehood, in declaring upon his honour to Brevet Major, Nicholls, and other Officers, that he, Lieu tenant-ColonerAbernethi e, never heard Lieutenant-Colonel Savage apply to bins the epic hei mentioned in the first charge, viz. that he, Lieutenant-Colonel Abernethie, was an imper tinent fellow," . 6 A. For conduct unbecoming the character of an Officer and a Gentleman, in sending, on or about ,the llth of De cember, 1817, Captain Rhbert Clarke, 'nearly three years after the date of the transaction named in the first charge, to read a paper written by Lieutenant-Colonei Abernethie, which contained the most scurrilous abuse of Lieutenant- Colonel Savage, for the obvious purpose of provoking him to fight a duel ; and for afterwards causing a similar paper to he put in the Marine Library at Woolwich; and for sending his brother, Mr. Abernethie, on the 12th December, 1817, to demand satisfaction of Lieut.-Colonel Savage, respecting, Lieut.-Colonel Abernethie's character subsequent to the in sult mentioned in the first charge, and in Consequence of that insult not having been noticed by Lieut.-Colonel Abersiethie, he also knowing that Lieut.-Colonel Savage had declared. to Captain Robert Clarke that be would not meet. Lieut.-Col. Abernethie, as he had permitted the insult mentioned in the first charge to remain so long unresented, and • thereby for feited every claim to Satisfaction, as an Otficer and a Gentle man ; and for also sending on the following day, the lslh of December, 1817, Lieut.-Colonel Lynn to demand satisfaction of Lieutenant-Colonel Savage, notwithstanding the decisive answers give:4 by Lieut.-Colonel Savage, both to Captain Robert Clarke and Mr. Abernethie." " 4th. For conduct unbecoming the character of an Officer and a Gentleman, in compromising scandalous disputes, in which he, Lieutenant-Colonel Ahernethie, has been engaged with junior Officers, snore particularly with_ Lieutenant Pol lock, on or about May or June, 1816,'wbo, on that occasion, threatened to horsewhip him." • Upon which Charges the Court came - to the 'ollOwing decision : The Court havingduly considered theevhienee on the part of the prosecution, and what the prisOner, Lieutenant-Colonel Thomas Abernethiti, had 'to offer in his defence, is of opinion' that the first Charge is not proved, and therefore acquits him of that Charge. •. The Court is of opinion that the second Charge is not proved, it appearing that the prisoner, *hilst he denied haring. heartrthe particular ex pressions, impertinent fellow, and d—d impertinent fellow, admitted in the sac breath, language equdlly degrading ; anti that lie•evinced no inten tion either to conceal or soften down the ()lien .:ive expression he had received from Lieutenant- Colonel Savage : the Court, therefore, acquit him of palpable or intentional falsehood. The third Charge not being cognizable before a Court Martial, the Charge was not entered - into by the Court. , The Court is of opinion that the prisoner is not guilty of the fourth Charge,. and that the Charge is•ab•olutely destitute of proof, is vexa tious, and malicious, and does therefore acquit hitn. The Court feels imperatively called up to com ment 'you parts of the matter that has appeared dining the trial, and wishes •to express, in ths stronge3t terms, its disapprobation of the offen ,ive language which took place in the Marine Library,.and which for so long a period was suf lured to remain without explanation or honour able adjustment. Before closing its proceedings the Colfrt thinks itself imperiously called upon to refer to the general conduct Of the prosecutor OW this occasion, and,is of opinion, it cannot in !culls sufficiently strong convey its reprehension, of his bringing. forward circutbstances said to have passed at periods so remote as charges against an Officer, when nothing appears to the Court to have prevented the prosecutor front preferring such, charge' at a certain period, had he been ac tuated by zeal for his Majesty's service, or tire honour of the Marine Corps. The Court, there fore, thinks it expedit-nt to record in its proceed.: ings, the high disapprobation it entertains of the general conduct prosecutor; nor can the Court conceive that the prosecutor acted under a proper teg:►rd for his own character, in bringing forward thoso'charges agaii►st Lientrnant-Colo- nel Abertfohie, at the monicn: when he (Lien tenant-CiAohel Abernetbir) was demanding I C pat anion for reiterated and ,recetit injuries : for i Lieutenant-Colonel Savage conceived that p ro _ tenant Colonel Abernet hie was ent of the pale of demanding reparation, these reiterated attacks ►very both nt►jusr and unmanly. His !loyal H;gliness the Prince Regent has ht en pleased, in the name and on the behalf of his Majesty, to approve and confirm the finding of the Court. His Royal Highness taking into consideration_ the animadversion of the Court upon the offen sive language which took place in the Ma rine Library at Woolwich, and whiCh for solong a time was suffered to remain without eNplana lion, or honourable adjustment, and which of fensive language, it appears by evidence, was first addressed by Lieutenant-Colonel Savage to Lieutenant-Colonel Abernethie, his Royal High ness feels it to be due to the good order of the Royal Marine Corps, to take notice ot Lieutenant- Colonel Aberuethie's conduct, by removing him to the permanent half-pay at the Corps. And his Royal Highness further taking into consideration the conduct of Lieutenant-Colonel Savage, and concerning in the *trong censure pronounced upon him by the Court-Martial, is pleased to direct that the name of Lieuterant-Co lone! Savage shall be removed altogether from the list ot Officers at the Royal Marines. THE BRISTOL ciiffitcH MISSIONARY ASSOCIATION. (Front The Bristol Joxrnal of the 31st ult.) (COPY.) • To the Rev. JOSIAH ThomAs, Archdeacon ofTath. " Bristol. 24th Jan. 1818. VEVEREND Resolution having : ap• geared in the Newspapers of this city, passing a vote of censure on your• ctithict, to which my name has been affixed, I hasten ro- intimate to you, that so far from coneurting in this measure, I highly approve of the manly pact you havt taken, and thank you it► behalf of the Establish ment. The measure - has me to ‘vithdrawr WV support from a Society' whpse proceedings I can no longer approve. I ant, Reverend Sir, • " Your most obedient Servant, " THOMAS DANIEL." Extract of a Letter from a most respectable Clergyman and . Magistrate of the County of Gloucester, addressed to the Right Worshipful JOHN HnY•rrtoane, Esq. Mayor of this City, an consequence of his Protest, inserted in out lasVJournal "I have seen with much pleasure in the Bristol Paper• your letter disclaiming any support of the Church Missionary Society. It is indeed,,high time that a check sh6tild be given to that system of intrusion, which, without any pet mission, em ploys the names of distiagnished persons, and af fixes their• sanction to its measures. On a late occasion r the Missionary Meeting -had been held in one of the new Courts at Gloucester, and they returned thanks to the' Magistrates of the county for the use of the buildiug. No such leave had been obtained from proper authority ; but the formal acknowledgment in the advertise meta was intended doubtless to imply, as in the case of the Town-hall at Bath, that we gave our sanction to the measure. I proposed, therefore, the following resolutions, - which were passed last week :—That the two Courts shall be appropriat ed to the purposes of the Assizes, the General Quarter Sessions, and other ordinary judicial pro ceeding,s. That whenever it is wished that the use of the Cireat Room or Shire Hall shall be oh tabled for• any public purpose, not expressly pro vided for by Act of Parliament, (.54th (ieo. III.) application shall. first be made to the Magistrates in Quarter Sessions, for their permission to hold any meeting therein." We need not, •we are sure, apologise to our readers for•another recurrence to the proceedings of this Society, after they have pertped the two important documents inserted above. The first is a letter from a very worthy Magistrate • and Al derninn, of this city, Thomas Daniel, Esq. ; an other Gentleman 'whose name was so ostentatious ly displayed in the recent Advertisement of the Committee of the Bristol Church Missionary As.: sociation ; and in which the Alderman • also boldly declares, that be has withdrawn his• support from a Society whose proceedings Le can ito longer approve." The second document is the extract-of a. lettez : from a , • Rey.., Gentleman, Magistrate of the County of Gloucester, thanking our Mayor for his manly address of last week; Awl in which this Gentleman depicts, in its true and proper-colours, the ad'eaptanduln vulgus, the le rc i ust thrown out cot face,to captivate ii the is tve mobility,k say littleb y all u n t ie he r_ on Association the upon some observations which have apPee r -- s:i)subject. t t l i i l is an S t o o cie n t swerable anecdotes, and barefaced frauds btar iii : i y a . k e laVrietitinatirikeseortattawedeu: since our last, with - the signatures to them of tu; Rev. T. T.. Biddulph and Rev. F. Eliviri. --Ib b , firstßeverend Gentleman has presented the O h , lie with two other versions o f the Serpent 1.8 ". which will probably furnish the - compiler of a y e* , edition of the Missionary Papers with an awl" ; ing appendage of various rt.tidings of the fain . text, such as fill up th e co l um n s o f those e, lc ; .brated editions o f th e Cl ass i cs k no wn u nder •l b tills of Variorum .Editions. Oar own incredolitY is certainly rather strengthened than lessened 1 theseenew au 'willies, and so . -we should thi l l f must be the mind of every unp re j u di c ed reader or; these silly stories. . To the letter of the Right WorsHpful the 111;1 ° ,! . .' disclaiming the Bristol Church Mi ss ionrry A ss" - - ciation, its Reverend Secretary has iep ic•fl U ° unsatisfactory a manner, and with as la nu' ' l , e ll apology, as we e xpe cte d h e must, do. T(' . 1.3 5 noon question of th e Mriyor, why his n a me " j made use of in an. Advertisement, contaluia l t l 4 Vote of Censure iipoil Mr. Archdeacon Tholio' he cannot or does. not say a word. Did the ' 4l ; final resolutions, p a s se d a t th e . form-ition ('t 11 1 1 , , • Society, authorize. an y Committee, in the 1''" 1 ,.„ — ,, manner which this Committee has dOnt, .U' "- , its Patrons' names to such dispute', points " ac s , of censure _ or votes of thaplis generally are, ‘'l' ti e7l , difference of - opinion is li n ow o to plevaii ? '' ' business of this Committee, at the first 1 0 ' 1° ,; Pion of its Society, is simply defined to be, " I promote subscriptions and thimitious, anti correspond with its Parent SoCiety, and t" Al ; point such persons a s s h a ll ren de r es - v . ) l' vices to the Society , e i t h er M e mb er ,i or t -- vernors for Life." An able Correspoodent l' a ! t ; I - 1 however, put this br anc h o f t h e di s pute r I, I so clear a p o i nt o f v i ew , t h at w e cannot a l ' , ' better than ref e r our friends to a letter signe" " A Constant Reader."—Both these Rev. Get', I. tlemen, and several anonymous Scribble rs on 0. 11 - t occasion, seem most feelingly to lament that lb!! religious controversy should be carried on thipni4' the medium of a Newspaper ; and Mr, liht.d"lP. ll says, lie has for some time past ceased to read ot ir Journal for this reason.—Surely, Mr. BidthliP h : ,you forget the importunities whicb you catistd to be made to the Editor a very few months sine° t ": admit into his -columns. _and which were ark-sitter.' at the request of yourself and friends, the lettt rs of the Rev, Mr. Cooper, on a subject which " 6 caused as much religious disputation as that f''' v c 1 under discussion. Nay, have -not the columns °'-' our Journal for years past been irevently filled'. and earnestly requested t o b e fill e d , w i t h re ports ' speeches on religious topics. op w hi c h :trod' 114 , - , riation of opinion exists. Is your cause SO W eW* that it : will not bear discussion ? Or are, r -23 , fearful that the circulation of a respectable Fr" ( i vincial Print extends through ramifications ata , ‘ocieties where your Sixpenny Pamphlets c atty' ` reach ? FROM .TUESDAY'S GAzETTS. DIVIDENDS. Feb. 25, G. Bowler, sen., G. Bowler, inn., and, strong, Worcester-street, Borough, hat-maim factnrers —F , cll : • 21, J. E. and T. Walton, Bread-street, factors-1' ` 27, i a , Reid, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, saddler—March 21, T. ('"""o Staines, tailor—F e b. 2 5, T. G ar d ne r„:jun., Lives 4. / .„ —Match It), Stockham, Bristol, batter—Feb• ?-• 1 ' Charles, St. Alban's-street, Pall-mail, tailor— vlarcli in,.lt. B. Fisher, Sontbaropton-place, New-road, Anne-ineren2.n:: April 7, J. Hodgson, jun., . Coleman-street,chant --rc I A 24, W. Reed, Fleet-street, law-bookseller—M.ach 7 , Whitehead, M. Howard, and J. fladdUck. Ca,tatoll bankers—Feb. 23, A. Gompertz, (;real merehmit—Feb. 28, J. B. Spencer,J. Bowman, ;not J. Bearbinder•lane, factors—Feb. 7, B. Thompson , green, Peckham, firmer—Feb. ill, W ~ W. Sherw , , , J, Live r P / ,` ) . ; ,;., soap-manufactterer—Feb. 2 , 1, E. Craike, H. and T. liig l° ll , Borough-market, potatoe-inerehant-Feb. 7, W.11 0 : 4. al.. Cannon-street, insurance br o k e r—F e b. 24, W. J. son, Nicholas-lane, merchant—March 21, J. Knight aiw o , Ashby, (4ough-square, fancy-feat h e r-ma n uf ac tu re rs—Fe b ', It. Jones, Northumberland-street. Strand, coal-toercha u ` Feb. 24, W. Potts, Liverpool, builder. • - CERTIFICATES—Fz.n. /4. - S. Clements, Boughton, Lincolnshire, corn-merchanl — : R Elliott, jun. Ihninster, Soniersetshire, Bilston, Staflordshire, corn-dealer—W. Davy, Norwich, Ott maker—J. Wilson, Coekbrook, Lancashire, cotton-spina is .1. Edwards, Knighton, 10(1nm - shire, draper,-.H.J.Northc oie :" Lime-street, wine-merchant--J.Wrue, 0 Ton. - , Yorkshires W °l- sted-manufacturer. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. D. W. Stone and . W. Scholetieid, Rawstorne-street , well street-road, tin-plate workers-3. Williams and S' Tor per, Becr-lanc, Tower-street, custom-hene agents Serner and J. Terry, Leadenhall-market, salesmen—Y •* ... W. B. Gartside, Hooky,. Yorkshire, dyers—J. and . 1 -r 3) idge, Bowbridge, Gloucestershire, dyers—J. nod J. !WOW * Bolton-le-Moore, Lancashire, inn-keei)ers—W. H o lcom t r . and C. Viner, Worthing, S ussex , groce r s —W. C o pp, • Lord, a 41 rind A. Copp, Exeter, linen-drap ers —J. P A rker,.o"" H. Gibson, H. Bar on ; an d J. Elli son' Accrington., l' 4"4a' shire, cotton : spinn ers —C. M oor an d J.'l'. Wray, Levlo' r „, l_ s Yorkshire, merchants—C. D av i s an d J. Matthew:, Brist"" warehouse-keepers—T. Stevens, 'Shaftesbury, and W• tire' reps, Gilliughaan, Dorsetshire, linen drapers—lt. IVatts ari . ; J. Atkinson, .Cheapside, warehousemen—M. and B. fiel" Botolph-lane, wine-merchants—T. Smith and J. Cocker,Pu i " Manchester, cotton waste-dealers. The Southwark Bridge Compatiy are going' ° II rapidly, with the intended New Briftge ; 01 ' 1 honses-im the lower p4rt of Qnceo-street f " . 4: pulling down as quickly ab possible, as it is. tendedlo be passable for carriages by his * M' JESTY'Slth.(hiy, so that the tltail coache4lo/ pass over. ,• MARRIED. On Saturday last, at the seat of Colonel Riddell, 'Enge l Andrew Miller, Esq. y o u nges t sun o f th e R ev. W . Ilastiehl Rectory, ,Gloucestershire, to - Sarah' Louisa widow of the late Judge \Vacd, of_ e island of Nevis. - f. - 1' ~ f .~ r DIED. On the Ist inst. suddenly, at his 'bonte, Upper-terrac e, Islington, Richard i•;ais. Daly, Esc - . aged 58. - On the 31t.ult, at his house, Maurice-square, Plymono; dock, William Lawrence, Esq..ag e d . 73, l ate S tore k eep er Kevham-point ' On Tuesday last, Mr. William, Slaughter,' of St. Martin's' lane, aged 75.. . . . . On the 16th of July, David Charles Ramsay, IFSq, the 1 -1 5'?; East India Conpany% Resident, at 11.10.1, Lad of their C;v a " Service on the Bombay Establishment. • LONT)ON: Printedk (lby J. B. CAP...St-int c. s, of N 0 .29, " r " p't - a Orniond-street, oci!. -tsquaro; 'and published hY W''''''' . 'SCRIPPS, of Nr;. 7, S.hitli Ml,ltori-street, at TFTE S IIN 0141ce, No. 112; Strand; where .Advettisernents, WW I . Letters &e, (post-paid) must be addressed. ~'