The Sun. — London, England, 1809-03-15 00:00:00

I WarSle) had taken, agninst her content, the letters,in . which the Queen and.the a•aneriei were mentioned. Those.letters, he tvisbed the House to observe, 'w.ere dated September, November, and Dece.niber. She had stated, She'was angry with hint' for haying taken them ; .it was probable she might be angry ,with at h.‘ast she had reason so to be, more 'especially when tlwy ere produced in public. The lion. Gentle - man;_ had, however, acted honourably in bringing liters for Ward; when be thought he merited praise, • he would not be a niggard ot at'; he had acted ho teerably in bringing themforward,'hut, in so doing, he hadgiven a death blOw to the canse he had been in 7 chfcc.4 tin espouse; as, from the dates of those letters, it was obvious and indisputable t hat she carried on that tiefatioes traffic; which' she had pretended had the sanction of hisiloyalHighnesst,without his know ledge, even after h 4 conneetion with the Doke had ceased. Pitt before he thus descanted on .the condua of Mrs. Clarke, h e oug h t ip have d one j ust i c e to t h e .injured testimony of n.Tionter witness. ;the evidence ot Co]. Gordon had Ineen-ill.spokett Ofhy those who defended the testimony of Mrs. Clarke; that man's mind Must • 1) P mcst unaccountably bia4ed who could say, that C',;'iotiel Gordon had equivocated, and concealed evi dence, while WS. Odic') had given evidence wor thy implicit belief„and fit to be received by any tri bunal whatever Colonel tl.rdoo's evidence was clear, perspicuous,' and unequivocal. "0! but," says the Noble 'Lord opposite (Lord Folkstono, " when called on to Produce all the letters relating to the exchange. of Brooke and Knight, he had failed to bring one for ward :" and what Was the letter which he had thus failed io bring forward ? A kw letter to the War-O ffi ce on ot h er a ff a i ra ; at the eat& v.' inch Knight's name was merely :motioned. .As to Col. Gordon's taking notes with a pencil, of which it L . _bad • . .been 'said that they. might easily be erased, that very circumstance redounded to his honour, as had not Col. Gordon been a Man of honour, the ' note Which he li . ,d produced, written with a pen cil, would. 'have bean obliterated, and' never pro duced in, that House. His supposed prevarication with respect to . the Mahugs was not founded in facet. 'lt had been stated; that it was mot:- likely - that he should think the one who was. the 66jVct of their inquiries, the sUbjed ot their interrogatories ) , ;bah that be should mistake the other ter the man ; • 'but - here he could not agree with the Member who made the assertion : not one circumstance' laid be 'fore him appeared to attach to The one, but one did seem connected with the other. The Hun, Mem ber then spoke at some length on the *propriety of paying souse attention to the rank of •ain evidence-. • With resped to Mrs: Clarke,' he had to observe, • she Was not bound: by any tie, .by any obis t ;Jtieti whatever to spdak- the truth ; she Waft not eVerr bound by regard for the opinion of the world to give an •accurate statement. She was bound by hi) o*, thciugh she migt,t in souse measure be considered Sworn, as she-laid-her'hand'on one large , voleme,..the volume of revenge and malice. When .he, con,ider . ed the conduct of this benevolent creature, this in controvertible witness, he was of: opinion ;: , at but for her sex she should.hae been sent with Captain ,Sanden to Newgate. -•When asked if, she had not Put some letter, into 'Mr. Wardle's hand,.she replied no, in the most positive manner.. Two days after (fros t s her own statement) it appeared she had given , I heLn to hint to f o r war d some negoc i at i on , t h oug h )4 \\C " .4l e• was a stranger to her meaning.' On eve r:Y 4 cc 4 si(m, while affeeting relutlance, to speak ngamst the Deice, she had Appeared anxious to place ;lib 014 1 . 40 C r ill the most unfavourable point ; of View. When she applied to him for money she had asserted that: his . Royal Highness threatened her. with the pillory and the bastile, thoughno questions `.` Oa thrally leading to her, such answers" , had . been put to 'Throughout the whole of the evidence, she appeared admirably adapted for the stage trick, The Honourable Baronet had called it a drama, and .:he readily admitted the propriety of giving it that demo In itiation ; it bad a p l ot, : i t b ad fancy, but i t had no ruth. Site .throughout , was ever prepared with the s tage trick, (This he instanced in that part of her evidence which related to Taylor, in Bond-street.) 4e did not intend wading through the mire of the whele .of the evidence,' but some parts he would • Speak farther on. She 'hid stated that: the Duke wished her to plead her eoverture, and thus throw the debt sine had cunrraaed, while under his protec tion, on her husband. This, it appeared, was ab , solutely - the reverse of the truth, as she had offended she Duke by odering so to do. Titus she attributed . !tier crimes to his Royal Highness, representing bite as the most flagitious of men, where she hadiproved 'herself the most flagitious of women. It hurt him to see vice triutnphaut, and therefore he felt it his duty to expose some of the glaring falsehoods which abounded in her evidence In one of hei exautirla tinns sine hoped the House would forgive her, if she spoke too dosely of the Duke's misconduc t immediately after whi c h she endeavoured to repro sent hint as capable of the most depraved &mind a oran in his situation c o uld p oss ibl y •b e gu il ty of, by stating that he had told her her power was ceual to . hat of the Queen; and that if she was a clever woman, he would hever have uccaiion to trouble him for ma ney. Could any 411ing be calculated to make his Itoyal 1 - lighness appear more base, more despicable, and '•vorthless ? Mrs. Clarke had stated, that six months `liter she went to reside in Gloucester-place, that the `juke of York, finding her finances exhausted, gave Permission to recruit her store by the sale of promotions, .Sze. bUt let it be remembered, the """ei of .French Sandell, Tunyn, and Spedding, were • • poor to that period.- She lied said, that the kg nit have been acquai n ted with the extent of 'Cr wants, and the expenses attending her esta '.• "ninvnt, as she told hint that the one thousand iounds per annum which 'he gave her, was no more vvs requisite .for servants' wages and liveries. thought ). perhaps, the to mbar of. her,servatits, not have been inquired into . Now, when ' 1 wasconsideted that she had but six servants, with ‘.)attniel C.hter, only seven, and that out of that num- 4 ' 9 'AY wore liveries, could the Noble Lord -pposite thank,' however extravagant she Might be, , t nat she could tell the Duke she ,expeuded ION!: yell- that , way ? With resped to Samuel C , 'lle•lro l'Okved were glad that he had been -provided . ts th e army but if there was one case which than another induced -to look' upon .her . in 4 tight of it. detestable- fiend', it was Atte case of ; `'"tit.. oet Carter. Site had affeded a great objeCtien • his case brhught fer Ward, and bad ilfrd "" u e had promised her that he would ..not men ,. 11, i t : this could not .beirue. Yet she had repre- ,sented him as a foot-boy; yet was this a just state ment ? be receive wages ? No. Did he wear a livery? No. But then a coachman hadbeen brotfght forward, who bad - stated that he had gone behind the carriage; this w,!s very satisfadory ; but just hetnie the coachman lett the House, an ingenious friend bad have thought him i tntilled. He then spok.e of the Taiious-Addre4s'es which had been proposed ; be bad some . ohjeetions to them all, beettuse they mixed and conionnded *hat ought not to be, mixed and-con founded. ..The kopoied. Addreis of the. Hon. Gen tletnati oppoiite (Mr. Wordiej had something.manly 'was rendered :rripra&icable in every otiler;'- He a rclt ' greatly sorprised at the nu of argument adop.,l by . two Hon. and Learned Genikne”, ill he cow, of this debate He could not im iglu° they, h.l aeted with ih perteet candour which he would in deed expea from theme. The' Honours Gently . _ . . • . - . . inquired how often he hattgone behind her !carriage, . in it: 'the relitilence manifested to wound' the feel- man then took a brief review of the evidence, :tad when it came out only once; and trout his evidence • tugs o f his Majestydid honour to him. The sort concluded by declaring, tha t h e considered there wet • it that this youth, ins giddy fit, had , of cempromise which - hal bt.tm suggested he could :subs.tantial proof of the critninality ef his Royal- • appeared mere ly . ,.. e • . , once gone behind Mrs. Clarke's carriage. Samuel 7 by .no- means approve of, as . in eft al it did . but Hrgitness. Carter had`bree represented as having lived a ,year set forth thit s the King might dismiss the Duke if be Tile SOLICITOR •GENERAL offered'a few met ka with Mrs. Clarke in Cloucesterlplace. She did not pleased. After sitting so long on a mountain, . was upon the speech of the , Hon. Gentleman who h a d . 'there go e h to-reside till March -I 8, 1 seta, and Samuel this the mo us e . w hich was, at I segth to be brought . just sat 'down. Carter got a commission on the 9,lst. If, then,' he forward ? After sitting so many days add nights, Mr. Rosa said, he would notengage the.ettene did s e rve Mrs. Clerke in a menial capacity in Glou- was this magnificent and magnanimous resolution to non of the House more than two or three minute,. ce.ttereplace, it must have been titter: be inflained his , be the result of their proceedings ? Many persons in He meant not to go over evidence already c o ably commission. Mrs. Clarke could not recollect dates; t that House agreed on essenti4 points, but differed in 'discussed, but brit-fly to observe 'en what fell f rom si t e could n ot state at what period her conneaion minute particulars. It thteetesetsho were not nearly the Hon Gentleman (Mr. Martin) teith regard to with the Commander in Chief commenc e d. The of opinion coatd not llitittl'lki)EC course, God knew I the case of- Lord Somers. The Hon. Gentleman Crisis at Which she became acquainted with so in- a what come the House must pdrsue. front the nature could-not be more partial thin he Was to the period considerable a personage as the. Duke of Yerk was lof the mean Address rnieht be couched in very dif- in which it took place, namely, the reign of King not w o rth noting ; she could not recollect at what : hermit ternis , it might be an address of congratula- 1 William; but then it was a precedent fottntled on perio • d sh e - went to reside in Gloucester-place, nor at ' tione or of condolence or of both ; they might ex- another in the time of Charles the Second, to which what time she removed thence to Park-lane. The . press sorrow fosethe connection-which had existed period he was not extremely alt :Ord. He did not Hon. Member then spoke of Miss Taylor's evtdsnce ; between his Royal' Highness' and' Mrs. Clarke, Got. conceive that the Hon. Gentleman was exactly core he thotight it improbable that she should remember a they rejoiced 10 tied he is not guilty of corruption. red as to th e hi s t or ic a l f ac t. . I l V ite-House of Lori s fugitive conyersatiottlike that Which she had given in ' But lie was for one which should do neither.. He was had addressed' his Majesty for the removal of those and her evidence.. Mts. Clarke was enable to rememb e r • for corning to as many reeolutioes as they pleased, persons accused, and contrary to the usage law when Capt. Sutton died J. it was not known that the . and thus gaining the sense of the kiOwie. They had h of the land, they were removed without a• previous . appointment of Caller had been procured, aod that :t best reselve first in which road. they 'would go, trial. No vote of censure was teeeed withotrt exa- the Duke of York had' received Captain Sutton's ; and then , determine in what carriage they would be misettion of ev id ence u p on. oat h. O u D ow l er ' s ape thank s f o r it ere he paid the debt of native, but that conveyed ;• but not proposing to go to Greenwich by pointment, he observed, that many such had taken , Was the ha. Mrs. Clerke no .1 , appears to eindea- . ; water, put yourselves into a post-chaise. It eves n o t place, with ou t an y a p pli cet i otsettio d e to the Coin. your to injure this young mart with the utmost ma- i one alone had said the case was involvedie ceesidete naissary-Genea a l. i .. , . • ee, in t r yi n g t o degrade him from the renk of a. i able difficulty ; he. bad t hought of the propriety of the • . Mr. MANNER: Susreom observed, thou g h lt may. Gentleman, by representing hi m as having been her Speakeb proposing what line of conduct they ought be right, and .it. Was impossible it should be other anfootooe. He is now in a unwholesome climate, ~ to pursue. The •• I\h'oble Lord (Lord • bolkstone) wish, that the 'wept!: of /Aglow! should h o ld an o pi. met ttoriou • ' • sly serving his _country ; and should the I might take the sense of the -House, ' but his nion on this subjea, yet it-would . be wrong to pen i - misr e preeentatio n s of Mrs. Clarke extend to where i time was not yet come, he must wait for their ru,i imputations of the Royal Peteionage s item to go he now is, they tney prove to him a source of un- - verdict. . He' did not approve of taking any step .lorth in the manner which it wou ld . i n t h e p ro p ose d speakable mortification. ''H did. ' towards pimisbment tilt it . had been determined Address. If the imputation wete incorred, lie.would e - aye or no whether the Dukewas or was nor guilty, entertain but a poor opinion of trio people who would Owe reran ootig*lonii , ' And iie, it s,:eins. thought 1 s It was the first ihstance' he had es er heard of a indulge such • a feeling es was ManiteSt upon such • To publish; it to art the Nittion ; .. 1 judge..itiaking up his mind 'to inflict the same pu- i 'grounds.. In sueletim'es as these, they should ad - es Sore he atto she are mote than quit." known l , teshreent, whether me Jury brought in a verdia of ' a people jealous at the honour of their Princes, and .. Had the Hon. Gentleman, (Mr. Wardle) tinnier, or manslaughter. They ought not to say, ! not send forth, stigmatized; the •Illuorious'Personage W ',MAO' t leir utiimat,_ pinto i that the Duke, had `received the thanks of Cipsein .... h,.. 1 . , , ,n might bc, the pu- ' in question, without absolute proofs I big guilt.--si ,o Sutton for Carter's Comtnissiort), he urobabiee = • ( mehnient was del, rmintet on. If they'deterinined i ' From the evideee ic iel l iel e tied appeared, he not - t '''''''ejert'ld the Commander ; hie Chief its only wouhl not have brought the case ot this deserving , , oti an Address, he proposed that they ' should first • young nut) forwaid. He woud next speak of the COMO II) snme resolutions ; the first rnielo ' ;, r e'''•! .. e ., co(isidered the cases of Tony') and Speddine ; the latter was to.pay . the' Duke of 'York' 1 y •unpoee ..- . her eool. more than this former. She therefore was e . . ,„.. guilty. ,• a might be, Is 1 House to be gree . ~. ,o. . _ .O was aware of i•?—the 2. 1 - - --Oet Is ' "-- a ' - ~ 1 . but a h . c . . RIF": ' - guilty *of, ore debate. l-fe would, however, . i e 3 ~ Ought he it the inl ti p a n e p d u ' la c r l i i t a y rg o es tst , p,‘ .. r deuce of conntvances f—ac,' , ...mg the et deuce at the pre an anxious to get him promoted, for in herdettets at that 1 ll° g t L ui S . svisl . i . ed it to be Made; ir.. every is espe a, to be deorived'of the . comis rinn vit them army I He i, sent. tage or as public as 1 teuelt "."' e on the evidence in Shaw's tame, 'which he • time it was Tony n and Spedding, and Sprddi ! ig, and Tonyn. But .Tottyn it appears was most int:patient, 1 hle If a cri t , ' i ~, _mai e , e'S to huffer, let hi m b e t eeenstdsred as a,. downright tissue of filsehoodee ima threatened to withdraw his eiodey; then somethieg .2(''s l - . • i . ,IMatout , :!a in tee Lcs: e'' day. He would nave no- I . [Here the Hon. Member went into the minutes on was to be done to anlititthitn, and shortly alter he was . • thiegobscure. or P" • • ' • ~,, g,ize;ted, but front a variety of circumstances it " .23 ~i e ~„,o n ~, 0. , ...eutgueo s about it. ine eyes of i that. tart of the „evidence, and particularly dwelt pro‘Nd that lie was g reetted s ori f.dr grounds. Out ofa. , `. - " 4 ".. . " ....e 9pon Olen), .apd he would wish the ; upon the moral imProbabiltly of Mrs. Claike's being cotears-t- . ..e_ upon • ~ lis'i of COO natlieSenot one appeared filen Whom shahad . r ecei ve d money, with the exception of Tonyn's. She . as * it they voted arribigudesly, their coastittients ;. the circumstance ror her !I :tying ser, t rated fro m big could do nothing for Speclding, pen e t last aaviaed ' ceuld not b e f ; :ii i„fi et t ~' . Royal Hightiess on the i tth of Me t e of the Diike's , .0 hint tai. rite. to the Duke, hoping to be able - VI:1e- Sir Li . RANCI3 gURD,ETT rose. to explain as toNhe , reiluced to the in •tticient Intettal ot ,i single day to nearig at Oetlends on the loth), atel her being thus ceive CA 'il. Gordon. • Spedding did' write to the Duke, nature of air accusation which in the course' of-these • .. .. . . ' ate! then his RoYal Heehoess-ahev'eed' he wets aware - - proceedioes had - been .nude against- him, and 'to i • ae x c ri x : ii n i l n P o lis N il iii s s ue l t ay ' i l l : 4 6 ; . b t u t ];' - e ‘ i v i a e s t o i t il o :' , l : Ti it , t ' art h_e ti s la a t it of the , corruption, ill' wrilizig on his 01 PIT" ) riai "'sot which the Hon. Gentlenten who just„ sat down hail variation of a'single word in the expressiens whiCh to be noted,"—wit it t•olly , to suptetse tlie'b e e e a alluded. He . meant , the itisitittated offer made by f she deposed to be those of his Royal Highness,` party in this cor•ueii in ! ' Those k';',,o entertaiit such fhilif of 4 0 001. to Mee Clarke, for the papers which yio i! 4 ,n r,.. rer an opinion, must enagine, that his Yanyal Hiehne•is b b e p ose:sest e re l at i ve tx , the p .,,,, 1int ., itaitory. He taielv did,away the whale. For Ilia part, except the Dukeol:York hasl put himself in the power of a'-I - I . • f'ro cl ti • tsuch if- Ia I b ' she were. upon oath, he would not pay Much regard ste einti }.l - 11 le ia no oeri t. been ever : • matt, and then eteie tvoneed to , provoke him . to the •made by Alio). . . '- •..' , . ito her evidence Oa conversmion represeeted.to have - exercise Of - that po:ver, by Oiike;ittlitikhis eipeAa- Mr. ceomea Linde a few obeervations•ie repl :ta e lace four years previous to the dsliveranee of . . , . • i her cc:eine:my. He could trot believe that General Lions. Mrs: Clarke's supposed ability to procure the last Speaker. , , e k promotions, the Le.atned f=eittlernart t heti ludicrous- Mrei - le.Melertat wan of opinion, that if th e t rut h Cirevering ever went to Mr s . Cl ar k e w i t h one thou ly.' compared to insurance i n the Lottery. l'he were to h e sacrificed to the pivas;intry and witty : ""'I pounds, 43 a i s kib for her to ma e influen ce i n shortest time th a any weer appeared to beve _ sallies of the HoO m . Meber (Meeroker) i th er e wou ld 4 . " i t ehalf with th e C ei o inan d er i n Ch ie f . He would been .on her books (excepting i n , the, insteace off abe little left wher eo n- to build free, imp:w as - soon suspect his nearest fri en d o f b e t eg capable ofird, and I • Brooke and Ach , giu, .which he 'thought he h a d ser i ous di sc u ss i on . The' Hon. Gentleman had suit- such conduce}. He conceived it was a teise of cruelty of . his son's guilt. It seemed to Mtn that there wee to carry to the father, not roofs, but suppositions, satisfadorily explained), ' was six sni6ntlis. In a ed in fad a number of ensued positions which never Gitzette of two, hundred names;S:There was but one had. been, acid never :cauld be recognised by that i great trifling of words in the ditlirrenee between greatprize, and. Spedding's name was at the bot- House. He did not conceive that a proceeding he. ' a the ame n dr ne p t whichtout. If the Duke was guilty of the ch arges ' st i tute d bef ore t h em i n t h e i r Parliamentary capacity, I knowledge and connivance, as to the f a c et e i t h er preferred against him; be angle to'be punished mor e cou ld w i t h an y d egree o f corredtness would have. In his opinion, be assimilated i exemplarily than had yet been proposed, but' : itehe to one in a criminal Court. It was . t h e duty, in his 'Proposed such language was far more objeaicinable s. was innocent, they ought-not to be afraid of saying m i n d, o f e ver y. Member in the Hou se , instead nt• .: t han the original Addres Ott his sid e th ere was no so. .She had stated that hundieds' and liunclreda of sutfering himself to be tied down by conunon on i bias; it might exist with others whe took such . applications were made to her; if this was taut:, waS Initial Procedure, to pronounce his opinion in a man- l found out corruption: where . strong views, and.ere it it not Strange with such unlimited power as she pus- ner beComing the grand fundionaries of the nation. I could not be found by others. Whatever the feel• sessed, she only could be proved by evidence to If they ailed on contrary grounds, the Parliament , ings of the people may be now on this. question, he have succeeded in five a ppli cat i on s, thr o ugh, th e woad be converted to nearly th e same p urposetas a i trusted the House would come t o a decisi on on the Duke's determination to have proper persons ?' The Middle Sex Grand Jury. Whatever may be the na- I rights of justice alone. Hon. and 'Learned Gentleman then adverted to ikt 'ture of the be the flume may think fit to pros I Sir FRANCIS BURDETT, in his explanation, was Case of Elderton, to prove her inability teiffect•wilit' - flounce, and in whatever ease that sentence may be I called to order by the Speaker. she pretended t o ac co mpliSh. He th e n d es cribed aep li e d, i t was clear that they would address his i Mr. LONG, in observations made at some length. the!perplexity she wia in with respect to Col. Tay- M.tiesty at least on th e : foundation .of precedent.— ; and with considerable acumee ) controverted the eete lor, who was recommended by Lord Mathew. It There would be one found in a eeriod subsequent to ' deuce of Dottier, whom he considered as having wart Mrs. Clarke's polioy only to mentiou the names the R evo l ut i o n, a -periodwhich may well be called ' g i ven a f a / se C o l our i ng to , hi s test i mony. He de 'of ,absent officera, tvlio could not confront a constitutional.one ; it locludid. the. case of Lord 1 . nied the application being made primarily and ex ited said she gave the Duke a lung - list of nalnei, the ..Soraer3 and two others. He would. ask in that case , elusively by his. Royal Highness, with a view to ob. - only one of which she could remember wars nJiUr ;what MIS the coosequence of the evidence brought wining the. loan, . The Commander in Chief only' Tucker. Why was this solitary name only retneittes s onward on that occasiott ? The Houie of Commons, seconded the application of Sir Heir Mann, wham bored ? Because; returning lions fighting the betileass e riving considered the violation of public duty which he. (Mt. Long) considered as .princinally..intereeted of his coutitry,, he had been shipwreck e d, and 'h e t was proved against the persons.accused, came to a for Dowler, from the .strenuona exertions he Made his hie in sight of .Kogland. Befor e the waves hid resolution of addressing' he Tbrone, by submitting in his application to him for the situation: Them swalloWed the gallant soldier, and again gave lint) f thou. s proofs in she first instance, and praying her was, indeed, a considerable ineonsiiitency in OA up to mince tune ra l holiontS he deserved, she- dared i the di•aintssal of the accused from the service of the statement of Dowler, as white' having remonstrated"' not to mention !gun thins; nor would sh e have ict. I tr etow n for ever' ; and . Subsequently proem. 'tied to an With MI.'S. Clarke arst, and afterwards becoming, tit bricated this falsehood, had she not first aseertained ei pe ee l i me nt . Somethin - g ha:.l been , said ot the 1 party With her.• kid could net couceitre that Dow- that the object of it Was no mire. Ibis is the wit- lisComniandar in Chief not having been heard before • k would If l ftof I pay toot) . or an ot ce Q 70 . . a y:ear, ness whose evidence has beets spoken of a s going a 'the. Howie, :-but bad a denial been given. him, or in under r ' such circumstances as we plain; in the ilitli - great way iii extenuation - of all lierfaihngs. Inh'es I . fad had his Royal. Higlineas ever made a request to -leek of its attaiitment.---eAs. to Samuel Carter's Y • opinion; lier,evidence proved her the moat deer, -.tl ; that erect ?In the test! *.l,ord Somers,: had any ' case, he next observed that -3 what otherfi called rase of women. The case of Col. Sh aw l ie next too keeto I mitigation. taken plane, lie4buld a-,k ? It was a rule cinatiote iii the mode in which Mrs. Clarke delivers' consideration; entered fdlly into it; proved AN letter 1. of Parlizlntentary duty to eel with strict impertiohry. .! ed her opinions of the imprairiet fI ' ' ' 1 y . 0 i us appoiet inconsistent with her testimony, and forcibly Letinteil , He felt that be might be siiiettlar in theespousal .cif * metitt, lie would call tli,gust. The Right Hon. ent th e folly o f Mrs. 'Clarke in bringing that dotal- 1 'old opiniOns eto -them, hw.vover, he would always Gentlemao strongly charaeterised- the indeendence went forward, which he . doubted net proceeded irdtn ! pdilinacionsly *adhere, w , tt' 0 thyv .wore, just ; and : the arid integrity of Cal, Get ' te r denied' ,' ' en on, attie posst e - the greediliess of her malignitY. In uniting the two , 'priectple of them; as i.i: ckinCt!,v. ft • i.vei, that no ,man '- bility of its being impeached:' - rt . . . l t' , IL origina nio ant e , : a w ful fOneeions of Judge and Jury, -they ought to : whatever his rank may bee:stestO4l have an exclusive ! proposed punishment, without defining the crime— coneider carefully the whole of the e yes., ~., en d I r i g ht to ex em pe ott f rom beiog called tea tin account i the' amendment of an Han., Gentletnan set aside when considered, the case of Col, Shettr;' ~‘7 te se.- - , o ot I for corrupt iiroeeedit*s, above any other member of :- crime: and conoivatice e and tinaisted epan suspicion. be uniMportant in its etfeets on their deceee teke' . ,in 1. society. - Al Right f . :;ietieGentlentati bad said much t He would say to that, if his Royal HiglineSs did not the ' evidenCe of Mi.s. .Hoeendeie a n ds . - - - 7 , ,ttette . .S.-- o f th e eights ;Ind privileges of the Doke of York.: make necessary official inquiries in his high employe nesses, they had been proved wholly der - tine of -: But nothing had been mentioneti by him of- the at e ! meat, the criminality was neeesaarily put upon his • interest. 'She had ' , a brieher in the. army, and , tempt made at-p'deprivation of the privileges,of that back, He rernarked, Ow the dot:Woe should tic certainly it she could apply to the CoMlitailiter in • House.: No. enmplaint had been made against-the 1 managed distinellyand with justice, more particue Chief,tvith propriety. in .any one 'case, .this watethe admotiition which was given to the House, hot to ; larly as it had attrafted the totem:km of the Conti. c a s e . But she dared not Make applieation'even.- for i aa in a criminal process against the Duke, unless it : nent. It was said, that thought his Royal Highness hi nl , as her letters to Captain,Sanden evinced. She ••-- meant to deetrdt itself by so doime, . It was not only ! had a great deal of evidences in Ilia favour, yet the wrote; to litepeo enetenvotir ri get her brother Ica • right, but the bout:den duty ef that s House to rose- '. popular feeling Was Epinal. hitl3-1)y the latter he of absence, and afterw a rds whether he cetild put- cute such affairs in. the same Manner which theit did not thitik the decistons of ills! House should o o ch ase a promotion. Why did. she not apply to rise .-: forefathers had done. .It may be said why is not 2 in.-the ((fast influenced._ It should only he atio ate o Duke?' The reason is manife s t ; sleeefeetVd tri do so, an impeachment brought forward in this, case as in 6:ho ne st convitition. it was no- gre.at extension of But though lie thought the Doke free from em iu p, . Lord -,Somers!: ?.13ectiost he would say, as.lhe House , ley _ 1t to havb any thing to put forward in tion, he,' could trot but admit that in ehe instaot:o o f + ' possessed a power commensurate to the inflialote of 4ustitleation of a . personage, mho, Ilnat hiisitnation .'- ClaYering.'et 000 he thought him in a high decree - such - peeliehment, whiehit would be the ebject of • In We, was debarred twat nit ordinary interoonrse culpable, to give aim answer toanyapplication through .the!inipeastotent to prodoce,•of course there existed 1 . with mankind. He thought. it would become the Mrs: ci at lee,'and therefore lie could not-give bine no necessity for that form It was not customary i House to decide distindly -whether he was guilt; or that - Whim - phaut vote to.whieh he should otherwise ; ,to have *owe* to such a forM, unless a remedy , not. &faieileclaration was required; and he teotight 10';