The Sun. — London, England, 1810-02-24 00:00:00

~~_ . . ti ee illegal and unconstitntional. Had it not been Arm (ley of the Session in the Speech front theThrone e as illegal and unceestitirtionel as it was illiberal And his Majesty declared that he would direct all the -a oPpressive, the Ho , sse of .Cominons would not have;,_ persiltst would be necessary for the satisfaction of the ' been resorted to for redress; but, circumstanced. as House on thesobjed of the Walcheren, Expedition , the Society of the-Benchers of Lincoln'S'lnn were,, to be laid on their oil*. In the papers however ' there could be no redress for t h e p etitioner but b y ! Which were in consequence laid on the table, Lord • an appeal to the House of Commons. Had thet Chatham's Narrative rap not included. 'ln point of Society been ; a COrporate Body, relief might have faet it did not then exist, and in point of farts his been sought in the Conrt of Kieg's .- Bench, or in ' Majesty's Ministers did :not know the cootents Of the Otit.-r C , 11131S of 1.,a ,.. ". It the principle upon 1 that Narrative . until after it. had been presented". by "welch the Benchers of Lincoln's Inn now professed Led Chatleten to the King..The4motion which had to 36 - t bad elseafe been a6ted upon, many of the • been made by & Gallant 'Officer for the production gieatest.ornaments of the-taw .watild have been ea-'1 of thitS Narrative saved him (Mr. 'Whitbread) a great eluded - from 'that - profession, and.esiteet some of the deal of trouble on the present. occasion. It .whs not most resethable Meinlore . of time House - of Com:. necessary now to discuss whether such a paper ought mons would not now . ecetso the seats which they i or'ought not to be produced ; for the thing hid ac- row held. There had been _a series of letters, first tu;hy been done. - of ling could N.' more , objec- ahserted in a ,Morning Print, - and afterward , pub- tionable than the, general ,peinciple upon wh'cli a ' lislied in the form of a pamphlet, addressed to the person placed in the situation-of Lor4Chathain hay- ... Lord Chancellor upon this subjea: He Was per- ing been in the command of an Expedition,, and hav- Shadedibowever, that the authoit of those letters-'• leo , recess to the King as 'a Privy Coencillor , u sed "Vas Mistaken in supposing - it' possibte that so high , s'.<l privil:ege for the purpose of putting -into the , and respectable a character as the Lord Chancellor King's hand a paper refletiing on the conduct of the could entertain opinions. consonant to those of the : Officers associated with him in that enterpriSe. The Benchrs of -Lincoln's Inn on this -question. In L theory of the British Government did not e arrant fact, do such rule had hken established by the So- i such a proceeding; the praaice, Of . the British Go , ciety of which the I,Ord.Chancellor was a Meteber e i vernment could not go on, if such a proceeding was - but on the contrary, .that .Society -had refused to I. allowed. He called upOn the House to consider the ac'qu'oeee it; .a siteilar pi °position when neide to 4 circumstances upon which Lord Cheehain. stood: — them. :He moved -tor leave to . bring up the ee- The Noble. Lord having tided in coniunetion with 1 titlon. . , e i Sir RiChard Strachan in the command of the Expe- Leave ,„ was riven; and the-petition, after having 1 moon, arrived in England before the tertn in a tion of • been reed by the Clerk was ordered to li e on tile •i 'the Expetition, and on which arrival his distina.rni . . table. - , I' litary command of course ceased. lit all the public . ' - Mr. Siittin'A.T• gave' notice; that on •Fri6ay ht : I dispatchjshfrom the Noble Lord, not a stegle in' stem. iwouid call the attention of • the - House to this I anon was to be found against the navy, on t he eon . subject. , , ' .. 1 troy, LorchChatliarn had in those dispat c h es ex. , : Mr. MARTIN stated, that as a Bencher of Lin--, pressed his most unsiAified approbatiou of ttheir ilitin's Inn, he hecl objeeteS to the bye-law.ageinst , i conelaa. In - flu: journal which had been preented. .which the netiCon was direhted. He did not 'coil- t o the House, ' adverse winds and euntavenr .ble . ceive that the Society were. ..justified in the % este- weather lead been distinctly stated as the cause that _ Mishit - tent . ot.any resirietion ~t - the nature, 'alluded,. - parts of the nava servile had e not been perfortned to, ',unless nuon. the . disiirtei ground of immoral with the Cele,: ity wished for by the Noble Lord:-- . clzaraBere The 'regulation 'adopted by 'Liucolit'se 'But iti the Noble:Loy:Fs Narrative, in. contradiction inn had been seet,round, to all the lather Inns of .to theeerruS of approbation in which, in 11;s die court, but without success ; they having refused to - patches he had character teed the etforts of the Navy; concur in it. e , , incontradiction to the causes distinc t ly stated in the A person from the Army Medical Board pre- journal es having produced the'delayo.the Noble seated i return of the sick iu tbeOffernt.regitnents ‘Lord had, thrown imputations on the Navy, such,as Which had been employed in the Expedition ,to the put the two service s at ~ ssne. In the short - part which - Scheldt. , - ', , . O . he (Mr. W.)' had taken in. the ineestigation before _ A Message from the I s ords announced' their the House. he ,had asked rib questions by . which the Lordship assent "to the Incleenniey, Bill, the Priem two services,could becommittedr ;Up - to the period of - Wales's Lefeitig Bill, and the two Ecliequve of the deli Very of Lord Chathain's Narra tive, th e p os. Bills' Bills.- . ... . sibility of their being so committed was unknown.- FINANCIAL RFSOLUTION. , S ' ...., if - they:should now be committed,(which he prayed -After a short _conversation between Mr. Whit- God to forbid), to,Lord Chatham alone would that bread, Mr. - H. Martin, the Chancellor of 'the' Exe diSagreernent be attributable. AS in private life, chequer, and .Sir J.. Anstruther, Mr. H. Martin many inferior traits tnust.necessarily he passed over, agreed to postpone the discussion of his res t olutions when the great and leading. feathres of a char act e r . lentil Monday fortnight. , • were-estimablA, so in an enterprite, such, as the Ex • On. the modem of Mr. Rose, a Message was sent pedition to Waliheren, t ninor.circumstatices in the 'to the Loas,- signifying the acquiescence -of the proeeediligs of the officers, resulting :sometimes • from • House of Commons in the request of their Lord- inevitable . causes, and sometimes even froM. the ships.to :be-put ine;ossession of the report. of the clashine of contending zeal for the. service; if the m Comittee on the Distillation -AEC • - - . conu ,uee s were exemplary,... general it ought to be' bit- Mr. Secretary AY /AR wished to know whether reed in obliviOn, and ought n'ot to prevent the e - a worthy -Alderman (Alderman Combe) intended , . pressiOn of 'unqualified' praise. But when a Corn , 'under the present circumstances, to perseVere io mender in Chief of an Eipedition 'bestowed tin bringing forward on Tuesday the notion of which h ul l fled. approbation ottlhe Officers connected-.with be had given eetice ? ' • . e t o - nim in that Expedition, he betiared tne trust roposed . - Mr. Wner'fineefs replied; that in the absence of i n hi m ' by doing so, with the consciousness.- that his Hon. Friend, he could only. say, that as the im- that anProbation would be 'succeeded. by iMputa, portaen business (the Walcheren Inquiry.) stood for - tions _which it was, impossible that-any Officer could _ • Tuesdays he an d 110 •doubt dial he would siensent to . "hear unmoved. - What happened aft e r the return postpent his m otion. . . - • . of Lord Chatham to England? Did 'the House recol - 1 , 01-114 GALE IONES. 'lea; that in the Answer %licit his Majesty had been Sir-F. Burn give notice,. .that on Thursday etheSed to make to' the Address of the City of Lon _ • next he should call ille attention, of the House to don on the failure of the Expedition to the Scheldt, the case_ ofMr. John Gale Jones.. . • e . the Noble Lord being present in' London, and doubt- Mr. Caot.Eit prjsCnted Minutes of 'the .Court less in habits of daily intercourse with the . other , Martial- on ' Captain ' Warwick Lake, which ..were Members of his Majesty's Government, his Majesty_ ordered to be printed. , . - , declared that - he did not think fit to institute any in CITY. OF I.ONDON. - quiry into - the Naval or Military service of that Ex - Lord TEMPLE gaVe notice, that it was his,intens pedition.? If Lord•Cbatharn's Narrative had been lion to move an huMble Address to his Majesty, presented before this period, be defied any man to requesting that he Would- be gracioutly pleased to say that his Majesty. ought not to. have been advis-e communicate to the House by whose educe he had ed to'instittee an Inquiry into the Naval service of - been pleased to give the answer which had been the Expedition. Now as the lh,T,oble Lord ed not given to the Addres of. the City of London, on the denied that the Narrative, which had been produced failure of the - Expedition to the Scheldt. He would in the House, . was not the only paper** . a similar, • not at , present name a day for his motion, becanse description which he bad presented to ,his Ma j est y , it - wassetesirable that the important buswess of 'the he (Mr. W.) had . a right to a•sstftne that 'beibie the . Inquiry shoOld net be interruped. •- . - ' • --- h . .cohnstruaion of that Narrative, some. other 'report ROMAN CATHOLIC PETI;CIONS. • ' had been made by. Lord Chathap- to. the., King on -W. Wienlesm, after some prefatory obsetva- the subject. He did not. mean to say - that the Right ;ions, presented two Petitions. from the Roman ca-• Honourable Gentlemen opposite coold give a satis•••• • tholies of Ireland, which were ordered to lie on the factory answer. to these observations. 'lhey might - table, be as ignorant as he was ,on the subject. 'Aware as he was of the state of relations which subsist ed between the various _Members of-.his Majesty's- Government, it - appeared- toshirn - yes'y Prohable• that Lord Chatham might' have. declined answering the same question 'by his Colleagees, as that whiCh he had decli6ed answering when put by tile House of CoMmons. ' 'How then - was the Heuseoce-proceed ? Taking it forgranted that the Noble - Lord had pre sented to 'his Majesty some narrative - ter te,pert:plior to that oh the table (and if this were denied.by any , Hon. Friend of the 'iToble,LOrd, , he .would sit 'do %n and say• not another. word .on the subject), taking r this Isis granted, nothing could. be wore - evident, titan that in - justice to the charaaer ,of the ~ in . ,Nary, and maintenance of the principles, of:the Cons th utionse-principles which ought-to be practised as much as _they had been . preached—the House . • should determine to Address, his Majesty forehe - pros duction of that prior doeuffient. In what a situetiOn would the gallant Adinital,t who Was at the:head of the navaldepat tment of the expedition, and the Navy itself, have stood, if the Inquiry had never been 'te- Stituted by the 'House of Commons. • The pacers laid on the table of the House would have mani fested an apparent Batista lion at their .honduel, while there evo - uld • have lurked behind in the King's closet, unseen and unknotivp-by the world, in a form that could., nit be „gainsaid, a direCt accusation by the. Commander in Chief of the .expedition against Sir Richard Strachan and all his Officers. The system of favouritism not only must be abhorred by a British House of COmmons, but ought to be wholly unknown in a limited._ Mo narchy. • • It• geve an oppotteeity for those who maintained eleniteeralic opinions to insist, that truth tetver approact!ed a Moearch's ears, and that the best set ants of the2Country were misrepre sented because they' had not o the easy- access tit the Throne enjoyed. by the Ministers of a Court. LORI) CHA.THAM's NARRATIVE. Mr. Warri....l4,ahn observed, that as many' more. Wernbers-were then present than were in the House wheii Lord Chatham's. examination_ closed on the preceling evening, he -would State Some circum-' stAotes which occurred at that period. Those Hon. 7,;,-Cabers who ivere present Last night would re culled, t trit Lord ; Chat hani; had . been . questioned rela!ive to the riarratiie. which he had thought pro. per to present to his Majesty,,and.which had , sub s-vinrutly been ro‘luced the House of Commons. They WoU'id recolleo, that the Noble Lord bad also ti,-en asked; wltether he had on any•prior'occa-. siop prysented to his. Majesty any other narrative, niercori=n , ikiin, or memorial, relatiVe to the, Expedition to the Scheldt, They would recolied . that: alter the Noble-Lord had been repeatedli ques :,tio!ied onthis stibje'Ll, he at length declined to give au - auticver to the. inquiry. 'Puts certainly . was A e'lLanlF,tance whiCh induced a.strong suspicion that die Noble Lord liad pr'esi-nted to 'his Majesty some flotiii - roent upon the Subject - :bcfore the delivery of nal which' was on the 'fable of the House. • ' Lord tl - lam standing at the bar as Peer of the Realm, # ride COrn•rrittec7 could not press :4 queslion which - he ~.id not choose 'to answer; hut it was in the power of the House to address his'iViajosty for the prodntion.ot such , a paper, if it existed: - He did not' thit".k it necessary to trouble-the House at-any great ic-ngth on this question, which appeared to him to lie stra!l co , ipass, and to which he could not Con e the ity of Obje(iion.• Oil the 27th of .11,111itut Hbu‘ie resolved - to institute ail - Inquiry into Ite pohq . andcondud of the Expedition to the 5:1 ! . .t1.,t.. On the I 6:h of FebruAry; a gAlant'Officer, otim •h e not then s - e - in his place, a private 'nil cat Lora Chat ham's - (Ge,neral Loft!:s), proposed toe A.tisc... ti) address his Majestj. for the protinc ., :. on 'A narrative by‘L'ordehathiiht - , which that g,41- ,f.:lolficer stated Le .1 - tely te On the. It was imposSible that the House could allow any feelings so iosidiously created, to exist in his Ala jesty'S bosom, without asking him to coeenunicate aunt . to'his people. if arty other document than 'the. Narrative already presented e existed', and that such' a document did exist, he ,had a right to pre sume, since its existence was . not denied ; he bad also a right to _presume that such a .docurnent contained ch - arges, - the Narrative already produced containing imputations which only stoppedshort of charges:This - Narrative, completely at variance with-the Noble Lord's own letters., and-with the Journal of the Expe dition, had, according to hiS Own-declaration, - been prepared by him so long back as the 15th of:Oc tob.cr. 'lt had been reserved, however, till a 04 ' opportunity offered for presenting it to his Majesty. On the t 4.th Febitory, the Gallant General had moved for the produdioliei that Narrative, a docu' meat which the Notile.Lord had not even eon:Tat , nicated to his colleagues for their revision. Refus ing, as the Noble Lord had done; to answer the questions proposed to him yesterday evening, the House 4. - CommonS were called upon, on every principle of duty to their . ,SoVssreign,.and 0f:1 11 51 4 :e to their countsv, to adopt.the precedent of the Gal - lant.General,and to addreis Ins Ylirjesty for the pier-; poie of endeavouring_ Id obtain any "further docu ment, if 'such existed. ln what office. the Right. Hon. Gentlemen opposite . must look for those do currents, he knew, not.; but as, they agreed to the recent motion of the. Gallant General,. he Iglt . A to diem it; pursue the sante course by which, they be dame possessed of the. narrative . already pr. clueel, ;for every overt ad of • the King's, - Artist - cis sasere responsible: •His:nijesty - cOld do act wreeg ;• and O re Right Toe. Gvntte,meti opposite , nsustessrees ' a ce count for the a.ivice upon s vinc!s e his Maj. - sty e • induced toast, or they ouelli to Withdraw from the situations which they occupied in his Majesty's C uncils. He con , lodedty M e ing, thset an humble Address. Be presented to his Majesty, pra)iag that I , e would beigracieusly 'pl awd to erJer that thete he laid btsfitre the Hoi.ie coPidS of all Reports, Me-. meranda, Narratives, or Papers, submitted to hiS Majesty by the Earl of Chatham, relative to, the late Expedition. , Mr. Secretary RYDER bagged it might. be ciis tipctly understood that he did not question the right of the House to-present an Adress Siutilar to that . proposed by the Hon. Gentkeman.. Admitting . this right in its'fullest extent, .he contended, that in the exercise 'of the right, they must be guided by the limits of diseretion. One of the last .sentences l i t p of the Hon. ' roan'sefseecia Would serve-as an answer to iii r e ceded it, The. kirioe Gentle man. had . saide- tit was t'or -I , s 7 , ,lsjese , = . s Mi M!..3; CI'S to consider to - what office they would refer . in search of the papers which be wished to be predeced. There neithe'r was nor had been in any office under • Government. He- wished to be understood—there neither was nor' had been in any office uriderGovern ment any . .paper, report or narrative upon the sels jea in question communicated to a singietedividnal of hii Majesty's confidential - -ssrvants, Other than that now on •the table of the House,' any, that had not been communicated to them before t nes t 4th of February,. the day Oli Which ithadbeen preseet ed by Lord Chatham to his e Majesty. Al! the,Ad dresses on the-stabjea similar to the. erese. t which Kie House of Commons has) ,hitherto beets imlueed to carry. to the Throne, were either - tor' the pro chiction of regularly otfieiar papers,- to elneidate. my: , . .•...- measure the expediency of whictrfhey queetioned, or to ascertain the advisers of his Majesty on - any such particular measure. H. did tint', deny the . right. - of the • Cornmons to' apply, to the Crown in• any other case in . which they might think fit so to doe. but be„was perSuaded that the.motion of the Honourable Gentletnan - was wholly Without' ex ample. For even supposing that mach a p..iperas that descrihedjis the , Thin. Gentleman did . v:ttilliy . exiSt, as it had never been cooltnonicate.,(l to : Ibis Maiesty's Ministers, be could net understand what -possible reply, they conld advise his Majesty to make to an Address fremthe "House of Commons under ' Such, circumstances. It would be in tact tts open the private. escrutoire of his' Majesty. - Repeating his admission that - the House had' a perfed right to' address his Malesty On any subject open which they naigliethink fit .to address him, he was compelled to add that he eouldfiiid no just grounds upon which the Ikon, Gentleman founded the proposition that he had submitted to the douse.. Mr..PoNsoNsy declared, that if the Right Hone .Geptlernan had noOnforrned the Hiitise that .be rose to oppose 'the motion of his Hein. Friend, add if he bad listened: to the Right Hon. Gentlema i n's speech divested of that information, he-should-have suspeaed that it was the Right Honoinable Gentle man's intention ; syarmly toaupport it, for' there was not a single argument in the whoie of the Right 'Hon: Gentle,Man'a 'speech, whit h- did riot tend to, the establishment of _his . Hon. Friend's proposition. The Rignslion. Gentleman-hadaold the House that he did nordislinte the right Of the:Heuse of 'Com- Aborts to address the Xing °pore the 'subject; hut to that coritession he subjoined the declaration, that if the House'lVere ndw to exercise that right, he did. not know how hi; Majesty's Ministers could cot-sl yly with . the terms of the motion,"unle•s by search ing the King pritrate, ese-rutoire. Was this lan guaees—Was this dodrine for a Secretary of State to his Majesty to hold to a BiitishHouse of Commons? Did the Right Hon. Gentlemanea Cabinet Minister, - not know wher.e, to find a paper de/iverid by,the Commander in Chief of: an Expedition to, his Ma jesty.wit bout searching the King's private esertitoire?-- Did the' Right. Hon. 6' en tiernan think that such . a paper way of the nature of a -private and, confidene " - nal cotrununicaticht ? If he did think so, then the ,Right • Hon. Gentleman :asserted the right of any Commander of an 'Expedition, being a Peer and a Privy Councillor, to approach hiS Majssty,. and to make any representations which he chose, excul pating his own.eopdtt6l, 'and affeaing thecharaaer of his brother officers, which representations were to be prevented from coining before the. public.— Such a right would -bo subversive 'of everyo,nrincis ple of the British Constitution.. It .would destroy the, responsibility of future officers ; for if one Com mander in Chief was • permitted to exerc!sejti his . example might, with- impunity; -be followed by his. successors. The Rigl,t Hon. Gentleman admitted the right of the House so address his Majesty on the . . present fen..oocas He, Iliad been extretnely hounti= :foleto them: --He dinitted their right; he only denied the -possibility of their exercising it ! ." - The Right 'Hon. Gentleman said, that the. House ought to. -~- ,- ~- . , . . be governed bye discretion. Did the Right Hon,. G. 117 tleman think it would be discreet to sutfer a Com mander hi chiet ,of the Land Voricei to make , aitY private representation to his Sovereign wit It:reipe.:l to the co n duct of his, associate Commander; and out, to call fur a public disi.losure of that repr....s:::nht. • tier) i The first and greatest benilit w hic:i i.ro , e f . ) .the pub.& from the exer.c„i!..e ;,if'isright of th'''' '-:`'lzt-- le• was that all seciet miChioationi4 for ,pois4inlitlg, mind of the SoVereign ag:iinst his bt.-Ist servants '•ve,',` -. ., by it impossible, bee.g.use w h oe v e r ,resented to ,-''',, Majesty-any private' inetnotdali , such a s that allrni, , to, Was responsible to the Public fur its c ontent and because the' Ministers whu suffeied such ane' . morial to be presented ; or who; atter-the pr,esna lion of it, •attf•mpted to shield the indiv:doal bi whom it had been presente.t,`:,vcre l e T.e,onc,iiblo to, Public for their condu; If this- were not •th.s.3 Cas conduct.., to what Would the Monarchy (If Ens land ( direr fr' ) , I I I. the most abs.olute Inot)archy that cver 00,ste. 4 ? this were not - the cast'; i: f;._,.stem of lattoortti-ou, .would he introduced . into o)lTcountry as as pprtera as it ever prevail, d in Frlthee - or it i SP 61 ' l'he Right Hon. GeAlern,in had declared, tiot• l' ° tha , t did not .kotP,v where to look. fdr such a papc:r " 33 which it was the object of his 'Fioil*ourani ; Frieli d 5 motion to ptoduCc. He would ask 'the,qiiht 1-h'n' tall Getrile:nan .where he lOoked'for - the ,iii , :t ? . C -;e ' r the Right Hon. Gentleinan w:ould not receive.,:ww. r ' pare ar a ip torMation on the. stibjed fryas. L'Ord 'citt i a ljul ' - ' l°- . the Noble Lard had last nig',:t intOrrueU t•iY --'-''''"-- in:. ice, that : lie. had told hi•i, colte.tglieii of hisint" Dt : tinn to present to his i‘la r lctstv a- i Narrative of - ElPVlitiop; oral}' a te. , .v iiiintit , :s Vi,..fure tip L':''' l ditlyr•A estt it. fir fact, it •,•.-}- it', th . 1,' , / , c.. 1. `"'. 4 11 it , ielf that the Noble L. Ord bad "J i twin to !i l L t. ,, i i'," ' colleagues the - s ,cinch inch h.,- wa . ::(., ~ Fr3m the 1`.;10qo Lori, Illi r ~) ~ fnc t1.i„,.. 1 YL )i . l " , cGot‘nliltelleinnoatn'exitilldecnt bilyches::.'iiiirliii::it oto"..“lV,''''';7::3t: Honourable Gentleman said tha - the ii:' , t,' - '' ,, , t right to address the Kiim 1:4. - on thiS.;:..;;;_.! that he - ciauld ',not tinders'anA what ans,wer :vi' ci - , J'iy's Ministers could advi4e his I.vl ijesty to ref 0 411 t 'soch an -Adtlress. ' .Di.', the Right -t-lon."t;Lonlelo;111,„ sup Pose ;hat if the House of Co!iiiii.olisilad 3(iescl the e t,(iug on the subject; that 'his C.Nl:jest would !It : " sititte to deliver any papers which he might has/0 t . r ] 1)0 poSsession of the nature 'vequited, to on e of 11 . 5 ' confidenti , tl servants for tf:e purpose of -stibilli ttii/5 them to the House ? On this point the Right: 1:1_0"' Gentleman .had advaoced a d Qc trineof the mast re": eheniible desCription. 'He had produced the for per" oal . Character and honour of 'Ms Sovereign or the purpose of ,proteOting an Adruinistration.r' ' , \rou:;l the Right Hon. Gentleman ;ay that his. l S lll- je 6 lY w'as dlspls,:cl to wink, at the calum n i a tioa of ;,' brave °dicer ii :e Sr'i: It, Skachan Cr that he, wo6ll -•arlo , ,v Lord bi ;I - . . , • • • ' i tionsl , ua. lam, ~ .‘y intidwas iepieseti a ..... to deprive anOrticer of so. h lonvand ai 3 P" v4:a ''. e : o vice Of the csiimation-of hisdKing ~?'"Such a 53 P [- siipon was as oppdsite io the - -.;haractei.—to toe 11 , .' ,tegrity—to the virtue---toile honour o f his Ylsit" 3ll as it was confortnablZ! to The dark s i n W. liv it of 1 9. i tiigue., which influt_i!csed . the Conticils, and opt.!,l''' 'upon the conducto: Ministers. creCover their ow° ' imbecility - i : lity—to hide their own diSsensibu s ;l iis .N 137 ' jesty's personal character had been dragged by. 111611 into that - discussionY . • ' : - • ' - ' '' ' 1 The CHANCELLOR Of the EXL-tikoi? 000-'• 111111SL:1f perfectly ready to (-Wise hiniseil to tlii , t l )- 11 •'' i ofall the reprobation which title Lion.Getitletnati b"' 'so 4bUildaritly cast. -bill hi.; Riiht.lion. l , Frieltd• k''' c-ontended Opt llR?: . princip - I•elaid do , All by , iii Iti.gb.t . Hon,. f riend dt) rot' deers tli cen,i4t..neS and. :al", rnadversions.whit.h. it had rebz;vett. His' night.` Friend had statbdthat therc was no question DO I i ';; i3 the 'House of Commons had a right to addt, os -; " c Maiesty. tor . Khq pr v dnc, inn of spc;ii• papcfs.:w liet-t: . iii 4x - ks .. tt•nce Or not. TiON poipt'bisll.l; bt 1-I°l) ,T e l ' l ,l 7 ' 'li a e' it c ie ) i \ c4 . l '' t ll oe t' ci l l i r' n r t f. yt e .._.i l : o \ s rqv T e c . u h ) : r e Gi :- s , e ts o it .w t l rh t h r!i la c e a es d r t n it lA y l i t ' a l i h a i tj s : i t e e ll q. ,: c s e i c )t a e e i n ) d t : l ,: t_ : : el : i t l r t il :l e tbe; i : ,p : ) f t tL: r b o t rl :r c ll ' (.s llt d i ,.i dl ij : db : )r c 4tl : ' ) a : i i ;l lh terf . : i : t : l s ' : :; . i ' L, 'r l 3 ' , :- i '' : ,i 'r)r l .. ' t ' ,. ' f 1 the expediency of afferdin,,.. - or ' wuhlici:Ji: la:. :lir kl aC i 7 :r t :: 'V Friend=-'l,- statt=u)Gfit Which in co - INN` 19- •,,i* r" - l ag iat 4i w ns e t r ' e ti f: L o .. t f C r ( t.: ll e s . ll.l' l c ' i t l i ' e 'll f . l ' .:n l . -I G iel en a t r l g:o:sl:l • l:i , -, J r; ; StI PI )Q6C6 that some COM,M11(1 : C .::, q1 1)1(1 beet; 11 ?' _by li the CoMmander in chief otiii-he.cxpeditiet, `', , ~,,• ;f i a IS. he i t g h ' e b n cf s ° t r l e ppo i 4 a sed7t r h a a ti t ' t e n oi t l l:i i s 'e Co ab u l fliti f ti t ic h a el:llor l t i ' .Noble Lord calniniii:it on , ti:e. e s l e so t ::: . i a n ss o u::::i t o o t7 dr , h aegl i l ei sL i s e ei h d , , s i r t i n ii t t li C et i , o t e' i ' s i thee th v i l i a -1) ; : ii i il l s : iij k , ii; ;;;t tle i t ' t i - i ,. o i nt s ittrable Friend nad c . ..ll l Friend : wht:n . ' ad that. his-Right' Houbuta.-‘l‘ i li: . e s ten i cl a j l ,,, )i s icl ty s t a c i x d ‘ p v a n i s: er t s l:a l t iy i e f ok could hot deKt,ib, . . jr. - v iL t li k s h ute i c i. 1 i 1 1:y.). 1.1. 4, 1 . :e 1010 y i.j.tc1. e t tr r. i i i, u tp : ir d iH.l6l . iiis t. It,laa)am:lis:c:'iliriesieittlinit'a.fa‘efarltd,t:Hr:itteoilisieu'oyste'fet::''isite's:::(lel:::.i'lici::`,,vl,,Yit tell' ''. 1: ' ,bv:s.,:i.oliteht.:l:::ol,:i:noltleGetz‘nii:it:t.r.rsie.i:e)iir‘o,ot.ll.,.Licii.,ti._iiiiii,:,,.2::iitie,,bl.oiiril.:o,d_(ri..,,,,, .. ~,. any piper or 'of •any o:vf paperl , a it nb w N ' ti a il s s - I : s e u r i t l e i d ed e ti i e al c i o li u: : :: a a i y es :_ny toutu. at i I t .):.ivt .i e lett . er was itoi, trio;dente •• oourable G'entleman's ,notion wobald be a he' r -?... excise of that right. The nature - a the sol , Pt 4 ' l. l . (t4 ' e ti , o i, n' t . hat T o le t H ile on..- Getliits.lteeirnseit:;:liclo)orsisi:ol-leillid,. e:':',,b-7,:... , . a e 1 o , : . Ivo ,. t ti t ,i ' .i o o% . . on he : : o,4 it sf a ic t it i le o al i ti i -iN i e t r i a : r p d ' r ° r a o i d tn c i l t : oe l c . l y i ° t u t i g i l(itle o . t i f li i i i a l : l i ti ' i ) , p a tt a i i . ol . f:itotr i. ;:l : ttille . ,p : N' rr ' o E ,c l it ' j ' ' i : : :) 1. , ‘ r ia, o i.iri n eg t p he,l4th Lord C t i u '5;: '6113 ,, y's Mil ' ' 1 i)" equally il ,. d, • . ' o c t : 1 1 0 ; 1 gelS: conceit s n a i ! t - I : , t e t i i i l i t n : i e :l n i 1- ;: . tdol: lthat . iito. intimated g r°l ud s ilt h A ir l i i his ii.:;:le2:::111e:11:c.1:'::::: I ckl or t from a U 6 t r il ' h o e i t n .,ti e al b r )l e c al: o ;d u rt i;: i.i er : r r ia , dil F t : ' ,. ; , livered . ;obis Majesty, and t e he i , l n '. 1 1 1111.0111 V.lOl !_ ucv i Sate, Was an ivin i li v' hee r: : :: :a l d l hb y eneo w h. ka i o t di l lb l ie i re o t we i c fb a t t.d l iu c : oi t; i i,i a ayl l s r t e l oc i; on c p t l l l e s r c o l f l i i n .t i i Majesty'scus ° G .., ''e 1.: , 1*. i t b s i 4 o t e t t I n:c b ' ell alien I.- had vt it 7 h o w l ocaltsi been, l)l: was o -1) ° 0 1 7:1 d i y: i et e a ° s P . existence' e S cr' u a: m lidili e ic d .ti , ri adai w nnk sCip l oi i i tpP e r: t ;tict q t :::?::::::(:::. Micati" to his I%i tl l le cii ir servants,le.tch°and which vi a a cittl bya:',colotr i 0 - estv's - therefore ot i it,ol be could by no `means 1.- to s u ch a PI . "P" Si V a NOtilin ?,, , r 'could I: 1 , . more plain an - obvietts tha s' ri (l i tt i . ' tleman oppoiite 'had l e k i „‘,,.;s l - 5.1 1 ,- I t sll ,. e "".:Ci.ct2:l 140 N „:.1,110.1gra• s t "s - b s ea *lit utiiiilollllliit i ~ Narrativehad bean klio - ;vil to h il. ' ' • ; ;t , A ; to t hi itig t that - 1 vi N ' arrp --Jr"Fquii ; Er ttiml it erei Chiral 1 ;a 1 ni i ,ha) ° f lit ( f eali th e tb e Or h tat , ttkt, to , th e /. . !ueli n . quir e knu v proc,