The Sun. — London, England, 1818-10-14 00:00:00

I.r.lind":legl manner: Tb.a therse powers are in lia cot in its comini”,ion there can be no doubt, -Rod it may be :proper for me to state an what MOllliCr they are brought into Nil operation. In •the'first place, commission, under the great seal of the United Kingdom, goes directed to the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty, autho rising the seizure and detention of the vessels of ally couotry, saving such exceptions as may after wards be declared ; aid authorizing the same to be hronghr to jodgmenrin any of the Courts of Ad miral! y within tire don+iniona, which shall he dilly co:nnossionrat ; and the Lords `Commissioners of lit Admiralty are thereby atitlimised and enjoin ed., to will and require the High Court of Admi ralty of England, and also the several Courts of Admiralty within the dominions, which shall be duly commissioned to take cognizance of, and indicially proceed noon, all ships, vessels, and goods as shall he seized and detained, and to ad jiidge and condemu the sante, saving such excep tions as may he, at any time, after declared. consequence of this commission a %vat rant issues, tinder the , eai of the office of Admiralty, with a copy 01 sock conooksioo usually annexed, requir ing his iN •Ftv'S vice-AdMintity Coma at Ha •litax (co. whatever piace it may be), to take cog zatice of, anti judicially to proceed upon, all ship , and goods, that are or shall he taken within the limits of said (;hurt, arid to hear and determine the same, and according to .the course of Admiralty alai law of natioos to adjudge and cooderun the same, sating always, such. exceptions as his Ma jesty may, at any time, be pleased to declare. Thus ,the Court of At!tnitalty becomes fully authorised to take cognizance of, and to proceed judicially upon, all vessels seized jure Belli, or under any orders his Majesty's Government may Isaiie deemed it expedient to issue. But, until the Court receives authority to act through the regu lar and legal channel, it cannot undertake to ad. minister the law as applicable to prize, and to settle the coollicting interests of nations. This Conic caotrot penetra;e into the secrets of the British Cabinet to ascertain what the political views of • his Majesty's Government may be on this subject, but as no regular steps have been adopted, to give the Court a power to proceed to adjodication and to condemn these vessels, it might lie inferted, that it was not the intention to confiscate them at present, but merely to de tain them until further instructions should be given. It must be well known to those who administer the British Government, advised as they are by the most learned civilians of the age, that the Court of Vice-Admiralty has not power, in the exercise Of its ordinaty jorisdic tioo, to take cognizance of subjects of such a stature. Uninfluenced, therefore, by any colt siderations, arising from the necessity or expedi ency of what has been proposed, and paying every respect to the order which has been produced, this Court will endeavour to perform its duty with fittnness, within the proper ' , mks prescribed to its jurisdiction, but will not allow itself to be led, by any plausible view of the subject, into a vague, iiregular, and unjustifiable exercise of its power. That these opinions are not merely the result of my own unassisted deliberations, but that t h ey are supported by the decisioi , s of the most learned and aide judges, both of the civil and common law Courts, I shall proceed, in the next place, to :hew. The first case I shall notice on this subject is the Curlew (Stetvait's Report, 31'?), in which Sir _Alexander Croke, in speakint: of vessels detained in con;equetice of a declaratiou of war, but be fore any commission to coudeinn, uses these words: • " This then is property which has been seized and detained, in consequence of a tfeclaratibn of tvar made by the United States against Great Britain, hut before any orders have been given by his Ma jesty in Council for general reprisals, and before any commission had been issued to require this C ou rt to adjudge and condemn such ships, ves sels, and goods as shall belong to the United States." Again, " 'fill the British Government has declared the subjects of the U.!ited States to be enemies, by its order for general reprisals, and by a warrant to condemn their goods, this Court cannot consider them as enemies' property. Even an order from the British Government to seize and detain vessels would out have that effect. That might be,ouly provisional, and must depend upon subsequent explanation, having a retro-active power., Seizures made may be declared to have , been only oat the footing of a temporary seques tration." Ilow much stronger was that case than the one before the Couit. The actual declaration of war, by the Government of the United States, was followed immediately by all the violence of war; the treaty of peace between the two countries was violated and broken ; the commerce of Great Bri tain was assailed and interrupted ; and all those tights which at( most valuable to a nation were infringed, in the haw spirit of national hostility yet, in 'lilt case, the Court could not condemn the property which 'guts very properly seized by his Majesty's ships. In this case, it is alledged that the citizens of the United States have vio lated the rights of Great Britain, by entering its territory and fishing therein, and that, therefore, th e ve sse ls s o found should be condemned. Bit if they had made an actual wrack upun our shores, it they had captured and destroyed the property of British snhjects both by sea and land, this Court would not be authorized to condemn, until it should he commanded so to do by the So vereign, in whom alone such power is reposed by the Constitution of our country. The next case I shall produce in support of my opinion, is that of the fluidal, (3d Rob. Rep. p. 235). That ship was carried into St. Domin go, and proceeded against ik Ihe Court of Aq iniralty. The Court there was ,properly consti rated as a civil Court of Admiralty, anti., his je3ty's instructions were addr esse d t o it tii'.'s'l.'rize Court, but by a mistake no warrant had been is nued to give it a prize jurisdiction against France and Holland, although there had been a prize warrant against Spain. Sir %V. Scott.—" In this case there is no imputation of misconduct ; the captors went to a Court which was sitting at St. Domingo, apparently with competent authority ; in that Court he obtained a sentence of condemna tion, and distribution has taken place in conse quence of it. But that Court having no authority, r (host puccedings-ve t•Yri nb isgal eCret whatsoever." Now at the-time the Court of Ad rniralry at St. Domingo was exercising a privz in- Tisdietion over the ships • and - goods of tv74.7) rite ions, it could not extend that power to property belonging 'to another. nation, although actual hostilities existed, and the vessels and goods of that nation were confiscated in outer Courts duly authorised. The Court of Adm;raltv is , not to look at the state of things between Great and another station, and to infer front the exist ence of hostilities, or from the orders is‘oed to the Naval Commanders, that its powers are called tort's, and are to be exercised to their utmost ex tent. It does not sit to deliberate on the politi cal relations of states, but to administer the law wheneter it shall be so required. That the per sons who have presided in the Courts of Vice- Admiralty have often ventured beyond the limits of their jurisdiction, and assumed the exercise of powers with which they were not invested, it is well known ; but this Court trill select higher examples for its imitation, and will not easily be led into those gross errors, which often prove injm ions to the interests of individuals, and al ways lessen the respect due to the tribunals of Jostice. I shall mention one more case, on this point, which was determined by that eminent judge Lord Mansfield, a case in which the is ri!..dietion of the Court Admiralty v was , very tally consi dered. In the case of Lind() v . Rodney, Lord MAn•field, speaking of the distinction of the civil and prize just isdiction of the Admiralty says : " The Court of Admiralty is called tie Instance Court ; the other the Prize Court. The [Wanner of proceeding is totally different. The whole sys tem of litigation and jurisprudence in the Prize Court is peculiar to itself : it is no more like the Court of Admiralty than it is to any Court in Westminster Hall." It is quite unnecessary to go farther into this subject. Here are the decisions of the most learned and eminent Judges, and they fully sup port the general position which,l must assume, that the Court nf'Admiralty cannot, in the exer cise of its ordinary jurisdiction, entertain any question which hears the character of prize. The first ground in this case is clearly of that nature. It is, that this vessel has been captured by one of Isis Alv.jesty's ships of war, for the violation of the rights of Great Britain, anti that such seizure was made under orders from the Admiralty. The whole quest ion arises out of a proceeding of a military, and n►►t of a cirit nature. And ths it is that mikes the distinction. But it way be asked, whether the orders thus Issued to the Naval Commander-in-Chief are to he emit:red nfigHtory, a nd whether this determiva- (ion is to operate to counteract the evident wishes and intentions of his Majesty's Government• To this the answer is plain. The Cowl has the power to take the custody of the vessel, and to preserve it in the usual manner, until the final determina tion. of GovernMent shall be made known, al- though it cannot proceed to adjudication upon this question. It can neither condemn nor re store. It is trite no positive instructions have been sent to this Court to detain vessels of this description, but sufficient has appeared to it, to authorize the regular exercise of its ordinary cate in the preservation of tl►e property. That I am correct in this opinion 1 shall spew by au autho rity ditectly to the point. Upon the declaration of %vat by the United States of America, his Ma jesty's ships captured American vcssels and brought them into the custody of this Court. At that time no order had been ;nude to seize Arne iean Property, nor had any instructions whatever been sent to the Court of Admiralty in this pto vince. Sir Alexander Croke (Case of the Dart, Stewart's Report, 301), under such circumstances, said " They may possibly be declared to be ene mies in future, but their present situation is ambi guous Whilst this uncertainty continues, the Court cannot reject the claim of the parties or condemn their property. Neither in this state of semi-hostilities with the United States would it think itself justified in restoring goods." In the , - present case the Court is bound to take notice of the orders which have been issued to the Com mander-in-Chief, and to give them an operation to a certain extent. They have been communi cated to the Court, and feeling itself influenced by the high respect it will ever have for the dis tinguished Officers to whom his Maj. sty may confide the command of his fleets, it cannot hesi tate to hold the custody of such vessels as may he brought within its care. In another case Sir Alexander Croke recognized the orders which had been issued to detain vessels, and gave them the effect that I am willing to allow those to have which have been communicated to me. In the case of the Zodiac (Stewart's Report, 333), lie said " If this was merely a claim as for American property, this Court would certainly not proceed to adjudicate upon it, because in the hostile or at least ambiguous state of the two countries, under his Royal Highness the Prince Regent's Order in Council to detain, and bring into port all vessels belonging to the citizens of the United States, without giving any authority to condemn them, no property of that description could either be condemned or restored." (To be continued.) DREADFUL ACCIDENT.—On Monday evening, as the engineer employed on the premises of Mr. TATE, 01 Bermondsey New-road, was adju,ting some part of the machinery of a steam-engine einployed in lie dressing of leather, one of the fly-wheels caught hold of his arm, and pulled hint into the midst of the machinery. Before effectual rissistance could be procured, to disengage Into from his perilous situation, his body and limb, were so lacerated, that he died shortly afterwards. Yesterday morning Elder, a poor old man, who was employed at Mr. Fletcl.er's wharf, Wapping, while in the act of standing on a scaf folding, by some means his foot slipped, he fell to the ground, and was killed on the spot. His body was taken to the Dock Coffee-hc..we for the Coroner's Inquest. Thursday night, a soldier of the 88th regiment, in a state of intoxication, attempting to let him self himself down the Castle rock at Edinburgh, behind the new barracks, by means of a rope fas tened to his wrist, it unfortunately gave way, wite.n he fell down, turd was killed on spot. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. GUILDHALL. ItOtattay nv Ma. Eonncs's tiousi.—Three persons, Mary Anne Thurnbry, Mr. Bottlers maid-Servant, Light, a resurrection-man, and a charwoman, were examined publicly yesterday be fore Alderman WAITIMAN, - consequence of NViffne sitting the office was much crowded. The prisoners were suspected to have been concerned in the robbery of Mr. Horder's 'house, in Earl ,treet, on Monday week last. A great deal of evidence, which had been taken privately., was read over. Alderman Goodbeirere assisted in the examination, and both Magistrates agreed in the pi opriety of admitting the charwoman as an evidence ; both declared that they were perfectly assured of her innocence i but though they judged it expedient In dismiss the other two, after a most minute investigation, they did not do so without having expressed their opinion, that there was strong reason for suspecting them of having been accessory to the robbery. EXTENSIVE EMAEZZLEXTEN'T....-Joseph SAtith ) YrIM was apprehended on a charge of having em hez7l,d considerable sums of money, the property of Mr. Fag, of Holborn, was committed on the ( 0 1 ing case : ‘Villiain Roe, guard to the Exeter Auxiliary coach, stated, that on the 19th of September se paid to the prisoner the sum of I'2l. 16s. 61. as appeared on the face ot the way-b 11, for which Smith gave him a receipt hearing his initials. Mr. Fagg said, the prisoner was the only one of his Sri vBllll who accounted to him for cAsh.--- There was no such curly as the stun just men tioned in the cash-book on the I 9th of Sew em ber ; on the contrary, there appeared opposite the name of Roe the word " nothing." Mr. ANDREwS, Counsel for the prisoner, seem ed surprised that the prosecution thonld go for ward, Mr. Fagg having formerly declared that he did not intend to press it. Mr. Fagg said it bad been his intention not to prosecute, if the deficiency had not exceeded 5001.; but since that deficiency had been admitted by the prisoner, upwards of 2001. more were unaccounted for. BOW-STREET. lfm. Cartwright, the driver of the Bognor coach, tvas charged by the surveyor of Charing-cross, employed by the inhabitants of that neighbour. hood to keep the streets clear, with stopping and obstructing the King's highway on Saturday, for 23 minutes, opposite the Ship public-house. The correctness of the charge was not disputed ; but the defence set up was, that the Ship Was a book ing-house for passengers and parcelaof the Bog. nor coach, and that the time it was stopping on Saturday was only while the coach was unloading the passengers, luggage, and parcels. The Act of Parliament not admitting of any excuses for stopping such a length of tone in the public streets or King's highway, the defendant was convicted in the lowest penalty and cots. The Magistrate observed to the Surveyor, that he hoped he filled his office with impartiality, and that he did not a!low some coaches to stand in the streets unmolested and prosecute others. _ INIURDER IN THE FLEET PRISON. CORONER'S INclugsT.—.--Yestertlay evening, an Itigh6t was held before T. Sit ri.-ro:;, Fel. at the Fleet Prison, on the bn►ly ,of James Lrarwnod, whose death was occasione►l by his being stnick with a tailor's sleeve-hoard. Charles Johnstone, a prisoner in the Fleet, being sworn, said, 'on Saturday, about 10 mi nutes before five, be was standing G• feet froth the window, opposite to it ; saw the deceased fall from the shop-board, (deceased was a tailor.) Witness saw him working a tew minutes be fore. Stepping tip to the window, saw a man, named Daley, beating the deceased with sleeve-board, deceased being upon the glonnd. Witness opened the window, and, witnessing the violence, called out for assistance, and said to - Daley, " In the name of God, don't you kill the man ;" upon this Daley seized the deceased, turned hint upon his belly, and seizing his thigh, said, " D—n your eyes, you rascal," and struck him three or tour times upon the breech with his sleeve-board ; be then threw down the sleeve board, and sprung through the window, and swore he bad not given hint half a thrashing. Daley re turned to the deceased's room. Seeing Graves, a lusty man, witness asked him to go into the room ; Graves went in, and witness saw no more of it. lVituess believes Daley was sober at the time ; world have entered the room, but thought it dangerous so to do. Witness saw blood ups n the head of the deceased before Daley turned hint on his belly. William Graves, a piiioner in the Fleet, saw Daley standing outside the window, near the room of the deceased, and heard him say lie had struck the deceased three timeit on the bleed) with the sleeve-board, and swearing, said he would not forget it in a hurry; had he not been an old man he should have beat him worse, but being an old man he did not like to strike him. Witness beard Daley say, that, deceased had behaved very ill; by not giving a letter he bad found to him, in stead of giving it to Lewis, 'who 'keeps the chandler's shop. After this, Daley, in passion, jumped into the room of the deceased, and abused hint respecting the letter. Deceased was then standing against the fire-place. Witness said, " For God's sake don't let us have any mur der done." Daley did not strike him at that time. Witness went • into the room to prevent any mischief. Daley had charged deceased with having given two letters to Lewis, but witness knew to the contrary, es in regarded one. Deceased denied having found any letter belonging to Daley, nor had he given any to Lewis. - As witness was leaving the room, Daley said, " he bad not done with him yet." - Then witness and Daley left the room together. Several other witnesses were examined, whose evidence corroborated the above, and the facts stated in the account which we gave yesterday._ Some :Medical Gentlemen who examined the body of the deceased found coagulated blood be tween tiro pia rzater and Jura mater, end also blood in the ventricle 3 of the brain. This, which ,pperstd to t tat~ vWct cf c.,tcroAl it they - 0 4 comidered . tv be the cause of- lt:Pr ) :%,tvf few minutes* consultation, the Jury rettorn e6- e diet of " Wilf u l Murder "• wrainst John Dv ,c i` - HOR Sattirhy, at the curt Court, Glasgow, Matthew Ckfde..:date, a cgoa tier, wits put to the b a r o f t h e above C°, ll , r ', o3 tl an indictment charging him with wilfu lly maliciously murdering Andrew Love,.-in tbe of New Alonitland, in the county of Lanark. ;sr deceased, who bore a mo s t i rr ep roac hable ;O: ifk ter, was eighty years of age", and on the J question had go n e to a co a l-pi t i n t beneignu" bo , hood, where he was met by the prisonert„ iv rs , had for some time pre v i ous manifested consl ue e k , hie ill-will towards_ him. On seeing the El ecc f g, it he, without any cause, att ac ked Mtn in the : i d t o. brutal milliner with a pi c k- axe , ar id .inflict'Tba, considerable number of wounds on his body' 1 nes e son of the deceased w as th e principal eViue t iti f' against the prisoner, whi c h with that of the n persons called, was so conclusive, that the without the least hesitation, found him There hes not been any person ex e ct itedio."? l‘ gow for murder sin c e 807 ; nor have there bc"o. four persons under sentence of death, at an/ o. time, far the last forty ye a rs,, al t hough the P7' lation of the Circuit exceeds 250,000 souls.• A survey has lately been made of the ' Fil l Church of Windsor, which, trom its dilsOt e o : state, it has been deemed n e cess a ry to take d°' and in its stead to erect a new one, , ri b As Mr. John Whitelove, borse-oeate.f ► r , ‘ B d it i,• lane, Was returning down a ladder, on 1 4 1, 0 0 afternoon, from his hay-loft, his sjiur caus ll ! of one of the steps, which precipitated him la p o . , floor, whereby his head and ()Orly were illa ch fOC cermet] and bruised. He was conveyed t ° Gem ge's HoNpit al, where he now lies in a able state. COURSE OF EXCHANGE, TUESDAY, OC1• /S. i ..-..........eme m .--. - . Amstet dam ' .. II 10 a re , - ' Ditto, at Sight I I t ' Vt. , Rotterdam , Antwerp Hamburg!) ~ s -4 Altona . Paris, 3 Day's sight Ditto Bourdeanx, ditto , g i -,, Frailli fort on time ... 4 • 111• • • • • Main f ,fi Madrid . Cadiz .. Bilboa . Seville . ___ _ Gibraltar . . -- 34 L Barcelona 34 Leghorn .. Geilua..... ..... . 46i---Ve il lee, Ital. Li T 0 Malta... .. 50 -Naples 43 r 94A , Palermo. ..IVd..f c Lisbon . - • ' . ' •5B .1, Oporto Rio Janeiro . Dublin.... ...... 91..... Cork .....*, per Cent, • Agit/ of the Bank on 'Holland.... 2 ytr , CeDi. BULLION'. f 0 Gr. ' Portut.al GoI4 in Coin .... ~... ' o ;lira I)oubinotis • . • • • 4 • , New Doll:Ail Silver, to Bars • • - , 0 5 . . _..,S 41 G 'ti I.h" 4'o .A>E, 4 fsti, sari irels Prin 4 1 ` ) !i( .10„ 'Pert ~~ eti v e4e 2 - h ou CON er n ,. 131 -A , _ ( t'of tpi #4 t, _ ?'he St ogy e. inr by ?h e 14 - 04 cfq", ' ewer 1a4e,4 I\l° MWMW ......... ___. __ ------ ,_,.. .......-- . • NA BIRTH. „ t. ti 1/100 * On the 9th inst. inloueester•place ' c 4 Portr't 3 ;, ad r lady of Edmund Fleming Alters, csq. of 13 ,....... err1 - - Acton, of it son. • DIED. . Ata " Ed' On the sth ult. at St. Kitt's, the Rigbt "°p' '.°l)4 round, Lord Cianstuan. , I of ily ' D On the Ilth in•t. at his seat a t North-court , , s -e lt' b Cautain Bennet, lt.N. in his •tstli vcar . ' ' " 17° • , w i lscl ' On the 9111 inst. Mr:, IVilson, wife of Mr. L'• ' • 0 seller, Royal Exchaw.re. ‘ i-ltsl' ire 'for On Monday, the .sth inst. at Oakscv, it , ,' ; ,,licot his 801 Is ear, Mr. rozotrtl, of Ecclestome;stratt ''' ~ o r nicely of Park-laic', ef °wit. . St/Dust.; DFAeot.--.Motiolay night. Mr. Williatrot rs ill; street, Ratcliffe, while sitting ito the parlour coli v f l3 . ...„, his daughter, fell back, and expis &I without a gr°` -- D' ' lls' PROVINCIAL lit It THS, MARRIAGE-52 it r ` TD - . le , c ii: o siazns. , #. I,i- - ;°` „ I On the 27th ult. at Edinburgh, the Lady ° . , p . n Colonel Macgregor, of the 88th R e giment. t'f o wl i g ` On the 28th ult. at Titchniarsh, the l'Ito• .."•''' 4 5 cti a daughter.. 144 r. T,J. . At Callington, Cornwall, the 'k% ite of the 80. of a son. " ~ TP lot,. o f MAttutf.D. 'At St. Gluvias Church, Cornwall, on '1111,0A43.1):100',' James Polkinghot ne, of Ponsunooth, to ,Mir 0 ,1 " 0,1 Treluswell, in the parish of Oluvies. sortie to b 1 At St. Austell, ors Saturday, Mr. Abr aham , rtY Betsy Keam. 1 1 ' 4 d' uo nty °. 00 On Thursday se'nnight, at- Thrapston, c . Let iox amptin, Mr. Dunnage, of Ho hitt, Hello . , f orou g,ltA get , wick, widow of James Hardwick, of Well' n o j Lieut: l l tll s° Ott Thursday se'nnight, at Wolverha..o of the' 41st Reginteat of Foot, to ef li Joy f place. . v sh ire , - , A IV !A r ;et ° f Yesterday se'nnight, at Calverley, •°' 0 .; Lu'i•pal o M izcs:Cra.d_d::: ° : .i . tip Hepworth, only son of Mr. Hepworth; Idle, to Dantaris, only daughter of the Ir.te 1 15 " tdo' Esq. r* bling - if , - )c Same day, in York, Mr. John Mite, 4 ,, , Da lton. , Iv,' Miss Burton, daughter of Mr. J. Burton , os. t i alfeio .7 In Killarney, Ireland, Joseph Busteed, .Lsi . A d ogP Regiment of Foot, of Tralee, to' Mary, s e c °n " ' the late Major Richard Ellis, of Youghal• cb ttr ;MEP. 11 0 7 Thop la- lobi re. , Last Wednesday week, in his 715th Yea t ios d, Yol,olta i l l son, Esq. of Hipswell Lodge, near Itiebn •Esq. o f . 0 -, ,, - .Sathrday week, aged 84, George'BAPV!,_,,,stree" , • Wednesday last, Mr. John I lalliwell, o. vuR isletb ei: of -0., frizer. . J os ep h Ba ll / 74 0 ' A few days agn, aged 29, Mr* 2 ,ed h id• Boyd-hi:l, near Huddersfield, clothier. koire; - ^f vil e- 0 0 Yesterdav se'nnight, at Altufts, 'for ~, t, o f" S" (). 1, A C Wm. Sinirt . hwaite, maltster and faster , t '' rcl . rb, 0 ( r. Lately, ,A Wheatley, OXON, J0. , .11 D_t l 2"L io tesa h ' _ ..04 , of the oldest Magistrates and DOW' an d inot' Counties of Oxford and Berks. indisposition, „, o we Last week, without anfrumps.revious • . ‘ , ll. l7,tlie:_. . o _ o , clitttely on his return walli, Mr. I , ..'_ ..nin gb 10 „„ti 1 . 1 .0 maker and upholsterer, of roolour-streeits,_tlr.u`:,h,on!....s:olP On the ...11st of August, Mr. Thorn; .1 , , , :', 15t ), of D" ess ilt of Wellingborough, aged 31; and on _ l ,; ics . , co odcl of his sister Martha, aged 35, loath of de: wig , 0 1 .3, Apo, Drowned, by the sinking of the I•• }hoard af .Istoet!..o,; off South - wait% after having . run uo o. _ , o f saa! . cal°"4o l Shields, Capt. Crosby and los ehlt.st s . :+ o _ o f ti n % fr us i . ) , , W. Hartison, sun of Mr. Wm. Hart t f ktr; ? u dd is,, u o ri Wray,-biliet-Lo. ti 0 P Mr. Wray, son of Mr. .'' , iL ting t''' 15 IS . I hitt, of Providence Gardens • all 9 bclut;trr o f II 0 0" At Cheltenham, Mary, eldest daug ,Of Stj ,ri Laird, Esq. formerly of Jumaica. . ~,z ar so" or e j Mrs. Pearson wiie of V.l.joe_pll 0 : 46 'lig , . . beth , A t- Wol7erhampton. ~...,... I.:11 0 v 1;, In the parish of 1,2..r.vabr0n,;,...,.,.,,; st ..-- st widow of the late Kr. Ther..: ?'" .1 ,'"7 1- ___, 0 her 100th year. ____....--„ 0., d r, A' t Iv' r . t i rw__,....-••i_ .--........--.--:: -c, e hi :1 0 . -- eriil... , Y, ce:e -.4% • ,, it LONDON: Printed hy J. IL CAV. 'end P L 'i 5t ' ( .,T a ‘ ;Orotund-street, Quecra-sour.sct. .....10,7eee!...d., SCRi,P2S, of No. 7, South Pl.9"•;oittis'' (dice, No. 112, Strand ; 01 ' er ta g s ;wes .041 I. 1. 0114. 44, (post-yaiC .10.4 0 .