The Sun. — London, England, 1809-02-10 00:00:00

She is an often-% -widow, it td seems; quite it; tlrt habit of Military intrigne. Q. Did . Cle witnez ‘B4l 4 tliteis'atd a , list of the prices 01 eornmissions'?=-4.' Not; I' never did. It did not - beloog_to are. I. Intve:sdem ste n ch a thing, I saw 1 in.Cobbett. Q. - What was the - name of the Officer's widow ? A. I used to see her frequently. • I don't'recolleet her name,: now;'. hut I shall'soon. -I do -not know her. I wish to ask Colonel M'Mahou to state what he knows of the nature of my propositions to the Duke of Vprk.—[Mrs. Clarke here burst into team] --I hi u ve this instant received a Letter of an exceed; ugly a lc r.!stit mg nature, begging me not to go on, which very much grieves me. .1 wish the House, {that my charaaer may not be so back as it-is retire- Setae(' to be,) to - inquire of Col. M‘Nlabon if I made improper propositions to his Royal Highness; or what were my propositions ; and.more particu larly with respect to the nature of all the Messages Of which he wits the - bearer. lam so rry to be obliged to expose him. - Q. Has the witness any obje6lion 'to put in the letter which she has received ?—A._ In a feW days, but not to-ntglit. • The CHAIRNIAN. , - , The Committee wish to knew :the contents of that letter ) ! --A. I have not myself read it through. • The Cu.vi ristAN.—When. did the witness receive the letter ? where ? and from whom ?—A. In the Lobby, when I withdrew ; it was given to. me by one of the Messengers. • Mrs. Clarke then gave the letter to one of the Clerks, who read it aloud. It was nearly as ful lows : wesuoinster-hall, Thuisttay tvelittig. Eight o'Lloek. " MAomw, 64 I am moat aittionsly desirous. to see yost to.night ; the lateness of time Inior will filikv no difference tome. . It must be unnecessary ipr to üb'serVe,. that the business above is illy reason for expressing this Soiicitude.- 1 should wish to see you here ; but, it yodi think it Inure eonvenient r it might be at Westiatimplave, until WkJultt be th6 . elo:night at your own house. To what t reter, you may vaAy;ruoss ; but it would be imprudent for me to glance at it on payer ; if your feelings at _all akwitt with' mine, )ou will write two metes, the one to b‘; aim to the messenger by.whoin this will be delivered, and the uthers‘lit to the Ex c h equer cot fro:liodSo. "', • • 4 I ant, INfisciatn, your obcdient Servant.' e• Wit,LtAre ;. Wl4Lm4 s." s. ) tried to. : get a note to you by two or three of the Ater - ethers ; but they declined it, from the apprehension that 401Pe suspicion thightattaelt to them in consequence.' Q. By the Arron'r sv-GctlettAL —ls t list the let 'ter which distressed the witness .s 0 niucti, and in Which she was desired-.nut to go on ?—A. In my opinion it is from what occurred yesterday.. . What does the y hirer's allude to I ceived a letter, troin the same Gentleman yesterday, the meaning'of which I- could not itnurtaliately dig over. Hu told me in it that he liad weir 114 Play about two months since, with Sir It. Peale 4 1 04 l Air• and that he had particular b4sittes4 with rue. Thi s was the Gentleman to wholn,l, al luded in, tiro early part of my. eXati)ination this night. 1 sent,to Linn, .to say that A shool4,be'happy to see !steel,.,. life caing-in consequence, Od.Was filleWll j&11.0 my iiraWitig.r oQu j. H e Orin aS,I4IMe if there was ianY 1194 ikk,A4 bgiC, t'9.0.11). him no ; and to comtiticailrim of the Opened time door) tind let him see theA ono .wo,Oppty. He then asked tele now I felt dkposcd Cowards the Duke pf York ; if I eiitert titled any revenge towards hint', midi( any meta could induce are to .t#ke tray-childreti : with tne nhaqd4ni nmy country. for. ever. Ile observed that iny chavaae r was so bad that it could. not be made cvor,e by oily stq, that might take, anti :Olt if I Would tollow the (pulse that he had pointed out, .t should be bountitully provided for-•-•for On the motion of Mr. BRAND the witness was ordered to withdraw. BitAvt:esubmitted,to the House the-necessity Of taking immediate theasnres forsecuring Mr. Wit. , The Cakicat.i.on of the Eictreitutit. was for the most proinvt step possible. .The doors of the LitsuSe: were instantly orderad to be secured, and sin the:mit:ion of this Cu ANCOLteit , of the EK(:ltEauttpr, the Chafrinatt having been pre- . yiously instructed to ,report progress, , and to ask leave to sit-again th a t aft6rhoini, the House was re-. • The CHAN'ent.t.oa of the Ixeitenuett ,moved,' '* That theSerjeant at Arms -have orders to take' into ravirody Wherever be could' be fetintt."-i-C,irried 'nun. The Serjeatit wme then ordered by the St it ER to 4 :10 , h11V duty , . ' • "Nlv fri.teroN reported progreSs, ant+ obtained' 'leave to sit again in tie course of the ! aftanoon. - • Mri-W, Saari:, wished thin 'might be called = in to say front whose haritts• she 'received the letter. 1 ." Mr. You Ka an d severa l other 'IN/emberS'addres:, , ed the House, but the prodigious Ittinnit: prevented us from collecting the tenor of their observations: Mr. Witn-nity,Ari tn,wed, Olathe House should, remain in its p; - esent st;tru until' the return of :the' Serjeaut at Arms.—Ordered. The Si't AKE it stated, that it, Would - Mite be.ert'' competent for the Committee, in suppco of their own proceedings, to order the Serjeant at Aftl/4 to take into custody any person withent delay. 'The *it duty of the Chairman Would then haVe been to r ePOti'progress,' and, when the perabh wa:-. actually in custody, to, move that he be eonitnitted, The seije:Mt at ArMs then a pp e ar e d at the Bar,. dhd intormed the Speaker that Alt . . \Vtllinns was iii custody. L On the motion of the CHANCII t.Lott of the Ex- CH ECICE e; the Serjeant at Ammar! Was Ordered to bring Mr. Williams' betore the .Commit tee • of •the whole Ifoutiel to . be examined as a witness. The House then again resolved itself into the Committe e . CiimastAN—nr Bring in Mr. Williams.' Mr. Williams was immediately brought to the Bar and examined ,by the Chancellot Pf the Exchequer to the following effeal l's , that letter the witness's hand-Writing; arid Was it sent by , him to be delivered to Mrs. Clarke ?- 4. (After having looked at the letter.) •It is my hared-writing,und it was sent by trio' to Mrs. Clarke. Q. Who is the witness?—A. lam a clergyman. CI. Where does he live?---A. Am I bound to an.; liwt.r. that ? • ' You are," A. I have seine personal' reasons for not answer ing it . You are hound to answer it."' •A. My present R1.4c6 of residence suppose r • , ci.rcutn4ta tiat New; ''Solners!Place ast, , Npw Roatl,SomeWtown. ,7 • • ' Q. Of course , the witness is acquainted with the t:prttents, of this letter ?—A. wrote,it., Q. On what business did the witness wish, to 'see 1011 . 3. Clarke I have business with berw,hich prebably this House-s-I'donrt kn o w exactly heS: to answer that question—the business did nut refer to the examination uotv going on. • • 7 Q. Were you at Mr s . Cl ar k e ' s h ouse yeste rd ay ✓ ? — 4 1., It was the day before. . Q. What passed there ?—A.lcan't recoiled the whole; I was there'near an hour. • .Q. Relate as much as you can rernemlier.A. As nearly as I can recollect, the conversation referred generally to the transadion now investigating before this House. Q. State the substance to the House.—A. She . asked me if I had seen the newspapers;' I replied in the negative. She then related to ma (what I have since since seen in the new s p a p ers ) t h at s h e W as very much fatigued .witiv waiting on the House of Commons ,the preceding night, and she withdrew without be 4 ing examined. Q. Are you certain that it was the, day before yes. terday 'that yon'ealled on Mrs. Clarke I—A. It was .theday after'she was at the bar.. If my answers are somewhat confused you must not wonder at it, for L am a good deal surprised to 'find Myself here, ~ Q. I again wish the wit n e ss ' to state the substan ces of the conversation he had with :Mrs.. clarke ? A. What I bawd' already salci. gvery thing , else re lated to the health of our acquaintance, and to other tritting circumstances which it cannot be 'necessar y to trouble the H ouse w i t h, Q. Did the witness state any thing to vespeding the future course of her examination A.. Not that I reColieq t - Q., Did he adviSe Mrs..Chirke what it would be be best for her to do I said it would be well for her to be cautious.' Q. Was that all adde=d t hat the high con nection of tlfe individual s!osiceined rendered caution 'doubly necessary. Q. Did the witnesvadvise Mrs.. Clarke to get out 'of the way ?---tA. Never. Q. Is he certain of that Certain. Q. Did he not tell her that he Caine from the Duke of 'Fork ?—A. No; there might have been-an ambiguity in my 11,in:ter that induced her to think Q. What was that ambiguity 7‘;.''-A. .1' spoke • to Init. the sentiments my Own mind--'4The lesuit, of my own cogitatien4, no cithefreferenee in the world. . Q. Why did he g o to Mr r Clar ;e LA. I sup- , 'pose I may be allowed to :Manseanswer that question', as' a vacitity Ot,.'drentnitances now press upi ii iily tuned. (A,,t*li' long paiise.) I went be cause, among Many 66..;-r occurred to me, That the contidebtial in'tercourse which Must have• passed between Mrs. Clarke and 'the individual,, whose namel presume I am not , at all at liberty titre to mention, might have given her an opportunity from his conversation in tont. years Of untesersed tomnintneOtiou, to bring matters before the Honk, of a sort calculated tp excite only his personal re sentment, mid the indiguation of the country ; and that whatever were the promises held out lo her, on the other hand, she Might not find them . sufficient to guard tier against the evils by which she must in evitably bo assailed. I, have said enough to convey ttYthe House my general sentiments ; and lam sure they will not be sd:unreasenable as to require that,l should express them in detait • Q. Did the witness advise Mrs. Clarke to go out of the country with her children No, Q. Did he tell her she would be provided for, if she died 'so No.' Q. Who advised him to go to her at alll—A2. It was the suggestion.of thy ow•n mind. ~ Q. Have you been long acquainted with Mrs. Clarke 1-4. A short time. Q. How long ?—A. Two months. Q. Where did you first meet with. her )—A. At the Opera ? Q. Had you any conversation 'with her there )- 4. A little., . Q. by whom were you introduced. to he1 . 1.6.—A. It might be said I was intrtidneeci to her,: bectittse' we wereln the presence ot.percons with whom - we' wereltputttally acquitinte4. , ;.• •. .49, What. inducecUthe witness" fo •eoure here this' afternoGn ?—A. I was. anxious to see Mrs. Ciarke.—; Must I answer that, question. • • •- , • 41113 bouttd•td - answer it.' .• • " = :, A. It .1 am bound'to atiswer it,' I must 4iiiswei. Alytegsort for • coming ‘: hertrlynt , -,to atiettipt, it I todissuadb Clarke,fron'il that itunic:ll, • s3reasti4' adopted in her fortrwr minations. . Q. \Va that tlte only objei•:t with which the wit ness wrote his letter to• Mrs. Clarke I—A. It was one of the objeas. Q. What tither'objeCt bad he in view T had ate obje4 in jeW by means adverse to ;he person whose coodud is now investigating and t herd' oi'd think that I ought not to bolo harshly questioned, Cu AIIIM Order! OrriCr Q. What other question had the witness' in vivw in coming here This evening ?—A, 1 thought, That if I had an opportunity to see Mrs. Clarke, itild re.- port to' her an..appointMent that . I had made for to morrow morning, with an agent of the 'Duke of York's, it was probable I might suggest, to her sortie ihing to prevent those statements which did not serve to elucidate the investigation, but led only to excite the inveteracy of the person whom I have mentioned. Q. Who was the Agent of the Duke of York ? --TA% Mr. Lowton. ~Q. Who made the 'appointitient?—k. I ad ciressed•hiut nisi, but it was by hint tti aOpillttuent was made. Q. For what purpose did the witness address Mr. Lawton ?—A. Fur the purpose ,which I have de scribed Q. Did you address him in wiitiflg or Verbally ? A. I had spokep unsuccessfully to two or three Mem bers of this ili itse to Mr. Adams, to Colonel Gor don, and to a Gentleman wboin I am very unwilling to name.:Colonel McMahon. a Did the, witness apply to Mr. Lowton in writing, or personally I had told Col. M‘Ma bon by le►ter my mind, and that I had not any per solid hostility against the Duke of York—(A dispo sition to laugh manifested itAeif in the House). 4 -- Mr. Chairman, if I say any ihing improper I expeal your censure; but I do not think I ought to be "the su bj e a of personal • I • 7 QAoiibe -more islhlie ,- *ltt)eisitt; did he *ply to Mr. Lawton in writing, or in person ?—A. eident I met Mr.' Lawton to'-night, within the last two hours. Q. What did yot! oay to him?---A. I know Mr. Lorton officially. have fre4uently seen him in the exercise of 'his atitrin the Court of King's Bend). • .:Q. What didlhe'*iiness sad to i}n ' ltold Litit that I had s p o k e d 'to Mr. Adam, to .‘C(Aionel ',Gordon, and t o Colonel M‘Mahon, and that they had detlided interferinf to forward my views. •• What ‘rere the Witness's views ?-A. `tire vent - Mrs.Clarke from going into, irrelevant tnattcr. 6.sut bow could th e Wi tness prevent that by gding Mit.Lowton , ?—A. lam not exa&ly pared to anwer that question. `Ct. Whit did the witneSs intend to p.opose to Mr. Lowlon - te area this object ?—A. answer as, wellus t ran. I can't exaetly tell what I slibuld have said to Mr. •LowtOn to , morrow, because that, of course, would have been regulated key 'tny cum minication with'Mrs. Clarke to night, and it was therefore I was so 141xi0tIS to see her. Q. Whattlid't he witness expect to rise in conver-. sation with, Mrs. Clarke to night that 'Would in fluence his confer ence w i t h Mr . Lowton to-nfor-. row 1.--A. It struck me, that in an unreserted inter course offnbr years— • : Answer the, question ?—A. I have not• the i disinclination, but I have not the capacity. What did the Wi tne s s ' inten d to-do, when he s2,lV:Mrs. Clarke to-night ?—A. - I' did nut wish to .smotlier the business, or to persua:le berm() suppre4 that which she ought not to suffpiess ; but ..thought ) might perhaps prevail upon .her to avoid ti,os e wit* tisisms which I bete: before nientiot - ,e,' Dots the flouse . wish one to answer in such 'a way as to coot-. trait a breach of priyileges.,. by she-wing I in,mt to tamper with a witneu? J,wiSh to mike one ob servalion. • • Cu,kIHXI c You must not trlakt; ally' 6 o l W'rva* 110113 ; you art.l only to iluiwerthe . ticitiocls that arc put to yoh." • • • • 'Wmless.—" Ain bound "to give that sort of testimony Which would criminate' myelf G. Had the witness written this letter When he saw Mr. Lowion to-night ?--A. No, My letter arose out cif the conversation which I had with Mi. )tiOw ton. Atu I bound to answer c11.1,:31iolli which tend to criminate myselt ? a, Does the witness refuse or evade answering because he is afraid of crimioating (With great eagetness), - Oh ! no' no ! The witness was then ordered to withdtaw, in , custody of the Serjeant at Arms. Mr. KHNIUCK rose to state to the Honse what he knew of the witness who had been last txatniued, (namely Mr William Williams). - .That:Mr. LoW top had informed him, that to all appearances the Witness was deranged, that ho, had frequently ob served his improper conduel in different Courts of justice, that he had persecuted him thin evening, concerning suggestions - he wished to make to Mrs. Clarke relative to her conduct reSpeCting'the Duke at York, and that he . really believen he was mad., Ate st observed, that he had ordered his servants not to admit any person 'who should not give his name; that the witness 'Mr. eall, , cl at his'houSe yeklerday, Was very unWilling to make his name ktlowh; however he sent it in at length 5 that a country G en tleth an had been with him ou the morning of that day thihking it wawhitri he . canto into the ball, fioding it was not the per son he thought, and that he did not know him, lie said he had hot any business with him ; would not hear soy communication of his coheerning the D. of York ; that Mr. Lowton was Royal Highness's Acting Agent; if he should thiuk tit to go to him. ! Colonel INl'Manosz staled, that in consegnenee of an ptionymotis Note' \Odd lie had receiv.2d, he coifed it NO. 14, I.3edlold-row, Russel-squar e , on P,Mrs..Fariiiihati who pretended that she had let ters which evinced an hostility of feeling tiom. Royal HiglinesS the Duke of York towards his Royal Highness the Prince of Wales: It was imPo i s i s'iole for him, try believe, that between two Illostrious: Brothers, to serve one de'whont was Ids ride and honour, there could txist any disposition such that, imputed. On further investigation he discovered thst. this Mrs. Farquhar 'was no other than Oldie herself. Colonel GOR DONT was then ordorea in and ex‘a mind, Re suited, that me. had called on him at the Chaneellnr Of the Exchecitter's, and on his telling him that he had a eanirounicaliotr,to Make on the snhjeaof the in - e:aigation retort; the HOie4e; he referred him to Mr. Lo , k too. LoNG being asked, if he bad inentionA Mr. Dowlees ha u te to the Duke of • Voll.,,—he saki, that hey never saw the man before his being at the Bar Of Flonse..;--Being asked, had he hilelol a list Menibers - olibii House; Svhli Would vote with Mr. hu, in c ase cat dkappointmou, and with whii;l l h e delight,;( —he ia id believer did. • Ex , OI;I4ED .11Y 1J It, WYNNP.. Had any tpidication been: made tho,Di c ke or Pori; tor u.commissarim appointint,;it ? di. Lest: mentioned, tliat,, ;:40:1 the Du%o, ui ; Peck told hink avtat dispute flag arit;en stout g,t the Otlieers—that Ite believed principally trisen.trurn the Pay-unamers—th4 be i lit:vta M. Maltby was the cause. „of it—that he Nvisinai M;tuby should be removed from .his place. Mr. Long said that a relative of Air. Manby, a Alentber of the House, wishe,d. that Mr. Manny stlould get, an appointment ; that he mentioned it to Mr. Pitt. Mr. \VVNNitt then ei,quired of Mr. Long :if he had made any other application to the Doke of York rt.:lative .Nianby, to which he answered in .the negative. Airs. Clarke was the; ex milted. , • Q. \Vhu tirst gave her theidea of sellinunilitary promotions ?—A.l'he per, applying. Q. What was iter salary from the Duke of York-,? — 7 -03, 10001. persapnurn. n,.. Q. Had she any credit with his Rofil Highness's . tradesmen ?—A. No. Q. Did she, receive, any money from Mr. Dowler and Colonel French, and did . she tell' the Dulte of. York ?'— , A. She, did tell. . . Q. Did she say she was promised money ?,---A.. She told the. w bole • stor,y of Mr. Dowl,:r . Q. Does she recolkti any apFlications for promo. lions uuconnue..ted with military promotions 1— A. Promotions in the ehureb. , •Q. Ha 4 any one .appli el l i t) you for prommions it)., the church ?—A. Yts, Dr. t),*.N,l.ira livid. applied .t u flle. in ardor n t h;e 1....w."...;. f): __ ' • . Q. flail she abjr`Other ilegotith ions or spplicationa for church preferment.% Yes ; lately, Q. What were they p—A. ,She said she esn'd not read her pavers now as she had no inie t them. (4. For what rank of promotion were the •appli , cations 'made Tour,' of Demo or Bishop., Q. ,How were those persons led to believe. that .she Conl4 have stitiicie n t ineoenee to procure , suelt p e fermqots S 4 did nut know ; she supposed in consequenc 4 of her reputed contlettien with his . Ito al Highness. sho meri inthe nathe of any person op ! , . plying for preferment in. the Church ?-4t. She said igho`nnderstood - I IC woWfl deny it ; that his Damp wa'sT,Donoran ; that .:appiici (100 Wad Callt.lilJed iii I kl4:riwit It%rere in t:433..iession of Cul. Wardle. : Q., How - does +4 Mr. Donovan means Jo deny the applic"atiOn lie said he would al togethvr. Q.' Did whness receive ,O lerter Trom. Mr. Donn" 'an, desieirt her to be clinch inl rapplicatiop to.the Duke of Vork, ot:.that oqter rerstias might apply, and he would nth. obtain the appointment ?—A. YV3, I did receive a letter, •„ Q. Did yOU tuentitm Dr. O'Mara's application to the Duke of York Yes, I did. Q. What answer did yotrreceive from hA Royal iglineu the Duke of Yorl; , l—A. lie told 'me; his Maje.ry did trot like Iniu on account of thep in his 11,101 e. Q. Did Dr. O'Mara give her any partictwir sum of money, and if he tiij,. what sow ?—A. The pentleman at }velem exami;nng, and whom. I be iieve to be a friend of his, will probably be able IQ inform the . , 2. nq)eatt:il.-.X -. SJid she b'd fbrgoteo or might tell she had burnt all. her papers.. Mis. Clarice examined by Nit% Yottr.R.-0. D o - u the 'witness recollea when, I)‘.. 111 ; 1 1 , ‘ .4411 opplic.ttion to her I—A. It wits in the ptar 14 )4 wik,sli the Duna of York wos just going to We/- month Dr. O'Mara c.111u,1 anuno for a lettor of tecommendation tind intrudaa ion to Pt.', a) I ligh, t , Css. Sir GEottoL- WARRHNDER.*--Q. W:tnes4 his said, il) a former part of he:A:valence, that fags Ruy:d Ifiglow , s hod, on several occasions, paid . seterkl Sums of - motley tOr her, besides the, lot*. I , e show ed imer yeatly,.dries the winieift adhere 10 yet .A.. 1k paid 1304)1. to Ovens:lint). (1. Did he pay 'latteral 'other sums site the 10001'. ) —A. fi t , paid for a faudau tor me, Q. Did be pay any, other •acm She does not ..recolleOt any .other sums. ' Q. 'What was the acnount, of the wituessis' debts when she ff , pa'rated from .his Royal Higlin.,ss the Duke Of 'York 1;—.A.'..4.14b0ut .s...:outfi. .1 SOCA„ Ihe ac coma by Mr. Cumrie, but afterwards 1 foend. them . more. . • _ Did witness receive any sums from the DOcas of York beside the 10001, per annum No, not any. • Q. Uow long did the witnc:i:reside at Gloucester. place ?--A. Auuut two and a haif, or three years, • fly Royal 'Higimese the Thke of York acqutinted, with the extent of tier estahlishinent evrta nly r he. 011. bit bate been, inasmuch as he saw WO e+t• ry day. U % bola was the t cart-Martial held that She alluded loon the last light she gaseevidence.? Capt Thompson. . • What A1k,4:014 , n.fture,of the evidence she th`tv: ou that (.ourt-Martial • . The HOtHe tioet iatg to VO of t l,is olvlo Aim), it was ‘rithdrawn. The witness was then ordered to' withdraw.. Mr. 'Wu ITaltaitO said, he rose in consequence of the assertion of Mts. Gail,- in the beginning of the, evening (mat she had insulted. and abused in cinning into the House cf Commons), to move that time Serjeant at Arms be ordered to ,attend the wit nesses tuand from the House of Coaunotis, to pro, tea% them from any insult or iffpity that might bay offered to them in obeying the o.rd#rs of that House. He said, \k"liatever rniglit he the charaOet, the nits. .rals, or the line of life pursued by the WittICSS who had been before the,House, that there was a certain detereute and respect due to ot. Sex which should nat be violated on any occasion, least (71 ,all OD her • entrance into that 'loop. 'lll••.am.o.tti 's;l4l, he felt it his , duty to °big& to the [notion °ibis i eu. Frieud, for ret o reasons, first that he did not, it ish tt shoulit app , 2ar thatkit was necessary to make any such other tick:oo4 ) .o l 4, on the most accurate enquay Otto the business, he , understood that no insult whatever: had been - dieted. the witness- in the course of the evening. a• ‘Vnprattaan b 3 .44, that. it night How, Friend would say, ,that no insult 1),:lA been otlered the witness, he would got persist in his motion. Mr. SfilittiDAN said he cotdd not be posittve, not hating been present on the occasion ; t hat. his know ledge: was grounded on the,strict tropmitieS which had b2.:11 tiY.tttt , triml yflit SitttJ KANT at Art ms was th en or d ere d th liar of the House to. relate the• circumstances. He said it W4b sc,ulv 1111)e before she could be found ; that - he had sent messenger for her; that all the coffees infuses about, the HOusenad beet resorted to to find, her ; that aftcr a considerable time she was found hi her .carriage near .the House ; that she was handed iron) her carriage by the Serjeaut at Arms,, , nod eon. o.naetl tolkeßothie. tieing asked it there were any person* . in the,pns. saes leadtpg. to, the. Howe, ho . said only seven or eight persons, and that not the least insult whatso everwas offe red her. The Serjeant wa s then order , 'O4 to With draw. MISS TeVYLLIR EXAMtNmW tIY Alit. WARDLE, . Nits the witness in the hftbit of visiting :Mrs. Clarke ; when, she resided a t Gl oucester - p l ace , t tic! proteotion of the Duke 01 York 1---A. Ye*, fie. tpontly. Q. bid witness ever hear,Mrs. Clarke talk to. his Highness-, respecting the levy-et' Qui. Pretieh ? X.es, I did : epee, , Tell so Or you recollea what pasted` iapor t that Occasion I remember that its to at tp.l , •sliOtifrom,4lrs. Clarke, relative to ,Q4-Frettelm's lety, his Royal Highness said, i am worried with French's levy,. but how, darling,. does he be. hlie towards you , Q. • I.ly time Arroittlxo.3otella,t... , --Eow long nas witness kno,,vn Mil, Clarke About ten years: mils witness not known her longer twin ten years ?—A. I do not know precisely. ' Where OW withes4.livel , --rA, At Chelsea.