The Sun. — London, England, 1808-12-13 00:00:00

...^.~ L.dl J~ a~ COURT O KLNG?s•I3ENCI-I, DEC. 12. SITJLINGS AT NISI PRIO * S,.BEFORE LORD LL!.LNIISOROUGII. ' GfiAPLIAND A ICD , TIMICER.V. AND FESTER l flis IN,11;E. • ~; c This was an brotight to. recover the amount of , goo4s; sold - and-tie:fivere,d,by :thy Pluintiffi to the Oester Delany, before her marriage with Petencfailt r ,Winshire. Mr: GAtttio stitted, the Plaintiffs,carried „on a citstillery...tor „the purmose of distilling spirits. They had served -the-betendani, klesirr, before her covenant with W.dtsh - ire,,with liquor to .the, amount of . 11:3l. -She. kept a, public-house,: the sign of the • Blue Anchor, Butgher;s-:ow, Radcliffe-Cross. A person of tits: tia.oe of roye, horn, he_uniterstood to ..• be the- son-to-law, of Mrs. Delany,-,was the Ctitn- micsioned Agent of the Plaintiffs, to get .t hem cats .; tOmers, and sell .their htitior for them. There had been a Commission of liallk . ruptty taken out again st Jinn, and-be was, at that moment, an 'uncertific.ated bankrupt, The. lAparned Counsel observed, that 'be.understood he was.to be biouht' fur.wird as a .witness for the Defendants, to prove that the Liquors were:sot on_ his account.' He hoped he.was formed, and that nu such defence would beset up ; far it it was, it could only be supported by perjury ; as he.would prove .that the Plaintiffs never - knew that Pope had any, oqter, employment of business at that.period than as their Commissioned Agent. The: Jury would hear the testimony of,the witnesses on both.sides,. and it was for them to decide which of their testimonies deserved the greatest. credit. He then proceeded to examine the witnesses. . John Turner,a carman, deposed, that he knew, the Plaintiffs in-February, 1807, and that he took a hogshead of rum for them to the Blue. Anchor public-house; it .was.a Mrs. something that kept the horse, but he did not recoiled the name.; she asked a man in the, tap-room to help hint down with. the spirits ;. he. took a. permit with him, and. left it after him; he' was hanged if be could recol - let - . 1 whether he had brought any, thing else there. • John Thompson, Clerk to the Magistrates of the district of .Raciclitf-eross, deposed, that the De. fendant, - Hester, was .hcensed for the iLue Anchor in September, 1806.; and that Pope was licensed • for the same house• in September 1807 : he only knew it by a cpl,ndar or memorandum that the Magistrates had for their own information.. . • Israel Ramsden, Surveyor of Excise, deposed, that, in February, Iso7, he surveyed the liquor in the Blue Anchor ,publip-houseJ it was thei3 . kept . by Hester Delany ;he only khew so from hearsay ; there were - 33 gallons ,of - brandyoo.gallyns rum, and 6 gallons of fiolia4s gin, the permits for which _ came from The Plaintiffs',; he. only knew the„-liquor came from the Plaintiffs bv_the . . , . LOrd ELLENEsuItoUGiI ,observed, that this evi dence did nol prove any. thing: . • Mr. GAnaow said,,he would_ examine Pope, and he would have his. evidence noted down. • Henry Pup . kieposed, -he w.as• employed by the Plaid titf's in Deceinber, 1806, as a . Comthission Agent to procure eusto:ners tor them, and to sell their goods. The Defendant, Hester,-was. his mO- Heaave the.Plaintitiii an °rot fro th_ her to send her four .dozei b of ,wine be never give any oilier order, for tier ; the • next - was fur him self, in February, tor .brandy,- rum, -and gin; he , told the Plainttis he had taken the _house. Mr. GARROW said, although he. last witness had sworn his client ou‘ of tool. yet he was entitled to' the amount of the wine. Lord ELLENEAtuOkt . direCled tie Jury to find verdict for the Pla utitf for the amount of the Hine, 91. Los. ; which theracordingly LOTEN V. RIOKMAN; • This was an action to recover damages from the Defendant, for ill-treating the Plaintiff's horSe. The circumstances were, that the Plaintiff kept a livery stable, • and was a dealer 'in horses: In 'the month of July last, the Defendant, an•upholsterer,, wishing to visit some of the fashionable watering places, called at the Piaini itl's stables to hire a horse. The hostler shewed him the hacks generally let out, which he, declined having, but asked to look at some of the horses that were for sale.—The hostler acqui . esceo, and the Defendant fixed upon a very tine horse, which the Plaintiff had refused seventy-five guineas for. The hostler was doubtful whether he should hire him or not in the absence of its master. The Defendant told him he was a friend of his was ter, and he wished , for him, a s h e could pass (Inn a,s 7' his own, and he would take the same care of him as if he were his own—the hostler corrylied, and the Defendant agreed to pay eight shillings per day for him ; he went to Brighton, Worthing, and Lewes, and on the 26th of July, he sent•hitu hoMe, 'after having rode him that dtiy forty miles, with his legs all cut, lame, and so much emaciated, that - if he had been put up for sale he wouldnot• have broUght 101. In defence it was urged, that although the horse was a fine figure, he had been, made up for sale, was quite washy, and unfit to do any work. The Jury gave a verdict for the Plaintiff for 211. the "amount of the:horse's keeping for 20 weeks, the time that elapsed before he was brought to the state the Defendant had received him in. ROBINSON V. TAYLOR. . . The Plaintiff keeps the Angel Inn', behind St.. Clement's, and the ll Pendant is a Serjeant in the :Marines at Woolwich. ailion was brought 'on a promissory note for 221. given by the Defend ant to. the Plaintiff; for the board and lodging of, the Defendant's wife, under .the following citcum-, btances, am slated by Mr. ,PAAK :—some time ago, a smart post Chai-se arrivtallat the door of the Angel Inn, •beh!nd St. Clement's, with two ladies in ii, who were very. genteelly, ,dressed.. 7 - The one was a Mrs. Wiilettt, and the oilier the Defendant's wife. These two ladies, Mrs 'Willtzt and Mrs. Taylor, re mained at this Inn fiat - several wceks; boarded -and, lodged there, kcpt their chaise, hur , ..:es, anti servants there. Mrs., Willett was an engaging . woman,.. which Mr..FARK - Sai'd,'; reminded bim of " a case well known• to hi, Lord Ship, and Which canie'fiutn the i - sighboUrkoiid . of thistlie. case Of 'the cele brated' Miss "RoninsOn of Blackheath. . Mrs. Willet precured a great • number . of expensive things while' at this Inn—lud Seitrar p•Qrties there!---ancl ."This was an action by Ale holder of two bills of ,exchange for 471. against the accepter, a young Pa phian Devotee of Queen Ann-street East; • Tim defence was, that the Defendant being an infant at the tune of the acceptance, could not be liable to pay. It was then contended, that the bilk were for necessaries, for which even infants were liable. The Judge said, that an acceptance .could not wake an liable on a bill of exchange ; .but if the LONDON : Printed by R !CM A HA) Ii k a Is, of N. 4, Martictt-court, Sow -street ; At the Sus -Orr Nu. 1 f 2... Strand where 41drotiseinenis, UrtZei s ~'!, ~.~ in a very extravagant manner. She talked a great deal.of„Mr..:BOdulph the: banker, and of an estate which sh.e,saicl: she had in Wales. However, thellaisuiff's-wife begarr taYstispea that all was not right- with. her guests:; upon which Mrs. Willet told' Mrs. Robinson, that she was going tb the Bank-of England to receive her dividend, and requested Mrs.. Rob; nson -to accompany her, and they went together accordingly. When they .arrived at the Batik, as the place was, pretty much crowded, Mts. Willet' contrived to give Mrs. Robinson the slip, and she.,.• never Sa-v her nor her companion v Airs.Takior aaaig. Sometime afterwards it was discovered, that Mrs. Ta).lor is a married woman; and her hutsbantil)eing .found Out, was arrested for the debt his wife had thus incurred for board and lodging ;- upon which he' gave this promissory note. The waiter of the Inn 'proved these faas, - and that all the articles were furnished open the credit of Mrs, Willet, who had thus turned out.to be a s,‘ iud ler. it was artenipted to he proved, that Mrs. Tay lor was the mere servant of Mrs, Willet ; but that' Attempt failed, because Mrs. Taylor sat down-aliv43 with Mrs. Willer, and appeared as genteelly as she did ; and therefOre they must be- taken as com panions. . . Lord ELLENBOROUGH was of OpllllollohataS the credit appeared to be given to Mrs. Willet, s h e: was the only debtor in this case,' and consequently' that this action could not be rmintained. Plaintiff wished to have that pointatvied in full , Court, he Would go With th cause. .11: - linen draper of the name of Wiils, was then, caned to prove the furnishing of the goods, but,it was obje4t ed., that lie was not a - competentwits, 134-cause he himself, in 'ease "this' attion did not' Stic'eeed:would J3e.liable as the• drawer.- But Ate Pla•ntitf having released him, his evidence was -rp,:eived,, and tie ,stated, that he had furnished linet3- and sdk stockings to the Defendant, - to tire: ainount'of the bills, froM December,. 1805, to June, 1806.- Being asked -whe ther part of the goads were not Indian, and contra band, he replied, that he could riot, undertake to say whether they were or not. He had no doubt at the time of .the trade carried:' n by the young Lady, but did _not answer to the question i whether or not, he had visited her often. , . Here Sir J, AilitiSFlELb interposed, and declared, that neither he nor the Jury could devise any' mea ante as to what might be the necessaries suited . to the condition of a priestess of this .kind, whose temple was in Uneen Anne-street East.,. The worship was besides dot toletated by the laws of this coun try, and consequently the•law . would not compel payment for the necessaries that might be ; required to carry it on. The Plaintiff was therefore non suited. MAINTENANCE-OF A CHILD. EROUGHTON #. BEAVAM. Adr.-.P 4 iRK submitted, that it might, as the hus band had so far a,knowledged the debt on the part of his wife, by giving this note for it-Lbnt no—for Lord ELLENBOItOUGH held that this note might have been given by the Delenlint in ignorance of the fadt that Mrs. Willet was the per On to whom the credit was given : and the note could not change the relative situation of the parties at the time When it was given ; and therefore the. Plaintiff was non suited. . Mr. Serjeant VNLIGHAY stated, that the Defend. apt was a Magistrate in Wales. He, had "wen. for merly an Officer at Mililia, and had met Miss Ann Broughton, the Plaintiff, a milliner, in Devonshire. They cohabited together, and a boy was. the'fruit of . their intercourse. The Plaintiffgot . a..note; Of hand from the Defendant for .the paytnent,of ful f yearly,. for seven years, towards 'the Maintenance of the' child ; but: he rekgitig to pay; site Was'cOmpelied toh .bring this action ; and the Leavneil•Serjtiatit expiess.,. ed his astoni,hment at hearing, .Learned., Brut her (BEST) liad A been in,trueed to defend it. Mr,.iierjeant BEST, 'h(i'We:-C..÷; ) iMili4draidely, gave up the cause,:and a verdid was giveit 'for the - Ilttin t tiff. ~; COURT OF CHANCERY, , Dtc. 12. SHAW V. LINDiAY. ' 111 this case a commission had been issued for . the. examination of witne'sses in Scotland. On - the part . i ASS AU LT. of the .Plaintitf, Mr. Richard HOtclikis, Writer to L ., , , the Signet, was the Commissioner named, and by I GOSLING V. CLARK. ' I'TifIO.VAS'A ‘ II ( a ' d ion for dainages in consequence of the Defendant, tvvo.Gentletn,in named Smith 'andl I an assault; The Plaintiff' it appedred,-had been id Niairne. On the part of the Defendant no witnesses .: thehabit of Aolding.tip two fingers! above - •fris fibre '-,. were examined, nor did it appear, that the COMlTlii sioners named by him - had qualified themselves to head when he saw the Defy' radant-, which:sign of aet as such.—For the Plaintiff, however, Mr. Robert- , the latter conceited t o be an Ap t i r n a ti on that h„rns. Strachan,Witter to, the Signet ) his agent in Scotland, . , he was a cuekold. Some bh;Ws ' f)lt'sseain consel' waS adduced as a witness, and the Commissioner, cpience between.hini and the'llaintiff.. l The hotdingt, up of Ihe fingers .vat admitied um the part of th e Mr. Hotchkis, intsead of calling- him before Intn,, 'Plaintiff ; .but it was contended th at t hi s was a s i gn and making hire, there answer the interrogatories put *0 .in masonry, and that neith e r lidnis nor • cUckoldord to him, accepted of" a detailed statement in s% riting, previously prepared by the witness, as evidence (A . :were . meant.% .Verctia fOr 'the Plaitniff=—Daniages, his knowledge of the transaCtions between the par- one Farthing. .. ties, and as ,sucli.had admitted it:as Mr. Strachan's deposition under the Commission. I COURT OF ARCHERS, DOCTORS COMMONS, Sir A. - PIGGOTT and Mr% }SELL. moved to have the deposition of :Mr. Strachan suppressed, as :having been irregdfarly, improperly and unwarrantably re ceived. This, it was to be observed, was not the. case of a cots non witness. • The person: so ad mitted to frame his ow n- story, and• that, too, at his leisure,' was, the Agent of the Hanna; and the nature of the evidence ,required of him, was not as „to common or indifferent transactions, to whichi more personslhan himself might have been privy, but tommunications between the 'parties, with which the WitOrsi himself alone might have been conversant, and on which therekne, as depending_ in a great measure on the recellettion of verbal con versations, the change or colouring of a iew wards might produce a wonderful eft - ed. sir- SAMUEL ROMILLY,' Mr. HART, and Mr.: CooK, forr-the Plaintiff, contended, that it was con trary to the praCtice of the Court to suppress deposi tions before publication. The ,books , ot practice laid dOwn what was contrary to the rules of the Court, and it was therefore not unfair to suppose, that what was there treated as not contrary to, should be esteemed consistent with, these rules. Such _was , the case in question. Moreover, however, it, would be inconsistent with justice to punish the Plaintiff for any irregular or improper act done by the Cum- , missiuners, who, (pow' that act, \vele Officers of H Court. The Commissioners .named by the De lendant, too, it was to be observed, were not altoge therexcusable, for one of them, Mr. Nairne, it ap peared, .was present, and did not °hied to the mode of proceeding adopted. Ssr A. PIGGOTT, in r:tply, contended, that it was perteftly immaterial in judging if the rule of evidence observed in that Court had been violated, to'consider by whom. that violation had been occa sioned. It, was sufficient for ,the, Court to know that such was the faat, to induce it to grant the ne cessary relief. Without throwing out any reflec tion on the country in' general, he might be' allowed to say, that those Gentlemen in Scotland, to whom the execution of the present ,Commission was en- . trusted, had exhibited most excursive ideas of the 'law of evidence ; but it was no argUment against the Defendant to say, that because they seemed all equal ly ignorant, therefore the evidence improperly ad mitted tor the Plaintiff must be received. MONDAY, DEC. 12. OSBORNE, FALSELY CALLED gOLDHAM, V. SOLjDHAM. This was.a suit or proceeding-of:Nullity of Mar-.. riage, brought on . the part of the . wile against-her husband; by reason of ininori.y. This was an appeal from the Bishop of London's Court, which Court dis missed:the. sun, on the ground that dissent on the part of the Mother of the lady was not proved. It appeared from the proceedings, that the mother (a widow during the minority of her daughter), inter married in the name 431 Jackson, whose real name, was Buxton. The Learned Judge (Sir. Wat. WYNNE) , was of opinion, that the mother being married to . a, person in a fialtiOClS ILUDei she still .retained her power of consent, and that although shy Was unac- . - quainted.with the ..marriage at 'the time it iwas:so .lemnized„, yet, as she never expressed ~any ; dissent carne after it tuber knowledge, he held it fo be a tacit consent; -and therefore affirmed the'stSuience of the Court below. ' _ THE BAEBERS the, year 134.8, 22 Edward 111. the whole company and fellou. slap - of. Barbers, within the precinls of Ox.ford; appeared . before the Chancellor, ' and intending thence for ward to juin and bind themselves in amity and love, brought with them certain' ordinations and statutes, - drawn .up in writing for the:weal of the craft of bar bers, desiring the said Chancellor that he would pe rue and correct thetxi, and when he had done so, to put the University seal to 'them. All Which or dinations_aml.statutes being seriously considered by , him, certain Doctors,. and the two Pro Mors, he was pleased - to put the University - seal tp them the next day; and Make the said barbers'. from thenceforth a Society or. Corporation. '''•,..• The first article stipulates, under certain penal ties,, that the said craft should keep, and maintain a light before the image of Our Lady, in our Lady's Chapel, within the precinds •of St. Frideswydc's Church. The second, that no person of the said craft was to work on a Sunday, only on the market Sundays, in harvest time, and to shave none but such as were to ,preach ' or do a religious act, on the Sundays, in any part of the year. Another, that all such as were of the craft 'were to receive- at least. 6d. a - quarter of each cuitomer that desired to be shaved every week. in his chamber or house, &c. . The LORD CHANCELLOR seemed mucik , in-clined to suppress the deposition. He instanced, a,cuse in Which, where the Commissioners had appointed the Solicitor for one of the parties' Clerk to, the Com mission, the whole depositions had been suppressed; and intithated 'that he had requested of the Secretary to inquire, • against to-morrow, into the practice,. as to the disposal of suppressed depositions, and it the information then turnishd to him was not very different from what he expected, he should then determine the present question, on which he had at present little doubt. The-shoal' of hefriogS which have annually visited the north and. west parts-of: ITeland.and the Isle of Man, for many years, have-this season extended :their visit to the Solway Frith, and great numbers of very fine large' ones werelast week caught along the coast, to the &teat joy of the inhabitants of- Cumberland, and south of Scotland. On the 12th ult. an apple was pulled from tree,. in the town of Old Deer, which weighed 12 oz. Ord was 12 inches in circumference. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Dic, 12. There are at present in the garden'of Mr. M‘Pber son, at Ardersier, two magpies building their nests. NECESSARIES FOR A LADY OF THE TOWN. WILLIAMSON V. 'NATI!. SHIP NEWS. GRAVESEND;' DE.CEMBIR 10. Passed bey —the Diana, !ones, from Lisbon ; Caldicot Cas4 tie, Larter, and Joseph. and Mary, ,Turton, from ()pone.; Truelove, Groff, from Messina ; Mary, Norris, trout cant ; Traftick, Lell, 'Rebecca and Sarah, Watson, and the Harmony, tlyndman, from Gottenburgh. sailed—the ;<osa, Ware, for St. Vtnceni's;-.l'rincess, Cot—, nisi), tor Sierra Leone : Nelly, Ancier)on, and the, Robert and Gcorge, - Beinliall, tar Cork. • - ad publialled Wby I AM E. a Sck I PPS, S;;Uth Al.,:ten street. ;JOS Irriv , r'squi:e; or the Pacer, Idlers for th e Lait u i, &c o - (POS/4.1241) 111USL be iiii.ressesi. COAL-MARKET. 61 Shim at Market. o d 50 . tcl Dec. s. 36 Newcastle 1 7 ;It 49 5 4`r c' 7 iuncl er h ln d 7 at 4 7s o d it* pa 7. 33 Newcastie 22 at 49 5 „d y 1 od S4nderland 49' °,l 7ci . . Ciders oat 5 61 40 ,1 ' 9. 42 N ewcastle 23 at -1 6 ! g .d 2 S uudc and z >C? - BIRTHS. O j,se i l l )h W L , . e d fc e o s: k ay . . a 1 .5tr,...0 .:,t, ,it t..a.:lsasatugßtiatrcnre.t, Hefts, thc. La "). o f a SO"' On Friday last, n! F li.et. stre e t, M rs. sandcrs. • thi the l o th jilsr, :0: . C hesh. , m, auks, i'vlr..J.,owndeit the vite of William Lowlides, Esq..„ot;,,^ ' - ion.. , , i i . . . . . . . , '.• A/, , ,g12ki.E!). ''. - • On Thursday lest, at-St.. MIL, Travvi:, Fsit C.,aptain if1•11':.; ~I.'), .,! Y'' ' ri6C." l i„lin Stec t ii—mont',-. to Fioinf.'t.s F,IiZLY, youngest dauo,t , ;r , f Esq. of:,,utx , in, Surrey. -, ' . - • ' oet- The sat' day, M. 'William Dickinson, of 1 . 1 '!"`"'" R o lane, Loi,don, to M.ss Eitiirwt, elti,rst‘daught,er of :sir. ' . bert'Emmet, of Halifax; Yorl:s; - tir...!.. 1. , ' i fiarn 1 " On .Saturday last, at ,St, A tiareo'4,- „1-Tolhorn, ,• 1 ~,, ,oest di , "'",. Hornid,e, Esq. of Hatton garden., to,Henrietza, C;eor.:...'s.' Sot.'iliti. -4 . ark', i R i o e b g e i r! I ter of William Marin3duice'Selidn, FA. of Hariestien-Volio I. Lately, Richard Crunch, F. s(t ~,1 014 . Ilroatftstr'fe t ' Mits Maria Cranch, &tighter of the late latnes Cranch, ES'''. I of Finsbury-squar e . .. . . . ... Last week, at Darlingt on , M r . Ri c ha r d Scott, or C , ° „ s n , I wold, to ,M-jsa lane Thompson, .of the King's llea 4l ,;,.,, - 1 Darlington, anti s ister to Mr. H arr i son Th u mpsOn, wq °-- ' draper, of Dean-street. • .• '' c per -1 A few days ago, the Rev. ThornasTullan; Curareo that I .wick in : Efinet, near Leeds, to - Mis s S ara h Wadi:, of I "RI • . ~. • ' • • '-,• • On Tuesday last, Mr. Pearce, widower, of the White 1 1 ' 111 Inn, lijnoycod, to Mrs. SpOoner, widow; " _....-.0 .. - . •D II!0. . , J • OW ", ''On the jetinst. et Queen' s Elm, Chelsea-, ag'd 9 11 , - "s• r"- A Iliipt, &Clic of,Major t General Elliot, of the R 6 - Y3 l -- NA ' P a go.. On the 6th inst. at I.hnehouse, Churles Rlch,,Esq7.7 • b On Tuesday t - nornir last suddenly at Plvirrut .' Ow Nicholatilstoftnan; • late 4,unntr cf His Map ' sl ' ;) -sty's ccrn. 0 ,1)IY On l'hursday night, Edward . C ale, E sq. Of 1155' row, LaytonstorN, i age(ll3 years. • - • • • OV The same day, at Pontefraei, aged ii, Mr. Thort l3- • ley,_ , ,stkr.gegn and Apiithecaryi, • Dl r. On the roth. iiist. at Bath, Charles Purvis, Esq• ;sham': itetite'County of Suffki Lately, at Calcutta, .Major4;eneral Dickens. • • of On. the Toth rift. at his seat bf Pentrdw, in the Cou n g . ~, it, Denbigh, after along akul painful illness, aged' 66 Ywrt' % kin Villianis, C;itstable of the Castle of ,o4e of His i'vlajesty!s.artristictsbor.the Counties Of FM' Denbigh. ' : A nsi ••• Lately, - 'at her houstcin.-130e.ad-itriet,lge i tHi l : - "N"We' ,s CorynOn, eldest sister of Nlr. Thomas, Sa-F.4, 4 nt. - hamplod; a' truly good I:vo J ii,, ;), hoselieneiroience a• - rity, was unbounded. Tile „pho i r, who were never se nt away. And More narticorly those in - her neighbourhood• sc.Y.erelY fe2-I•thelossiot - thetrhenelataress. M. site live d tro respeae.d, equal:;- respeded will Tier merrw r i c y alL:terr- rtiatiNel4 , atid every •one whb'had thq P sure of her acquaintance •....• s you K S PRICE-47, J , ___._ _ ;$ n A Y ~ , . ~ . .. _.. Bank Stock, Ingia Stock, ~, r, Navy; per Cent 'shut I nii6 iiontf, 7s :1 64 • P pr I ft.pez Cent. Biiil.- /,.., . . Exekicfpler-bilis,.7s. 9' . ;lie , Ce e iit"..R6l 65iiif Ornniam, ' ,3 per C tzrrt. • Con. shue, ...- .. lmperial 3 per-gent. 4 i Bank L. Ann. 18 t-ifith i 8 Con s . 1 99 'Opening, u " "_...... • • • 1-11,47 ! ii . AT LONDON A LONDON BRI 1.4)- fr lt)"' ROW, Morning, 54 mid: .frer to. Afternoo'n : , mil). 3'.„1„,%r 77 - 77 - 77. . LONDON MARKETS, ikc.. • . RETURN OF WHE'A:r IN 1144 RK--LA'Nfl. s By Messrs. CHILD and NIA LPA S, Meal Weiehe; : ;, l ia 17Cre Inclag only from iSth of Nov. tt; the 3d ot*Dec c 23 Quarters at I t6s o ee agrol) to the A4t 1439 Quarters' ~ c ti d at` 0., 61 31 ----- at toss od i 412 -----.,at 8 7s d ° 74 -- at loos od 4 64 ----- a t S7 a v 4 b j F.o ----- at 955.01-- 2S -------; at '''.' 6 b j 99 "------ at 97$ od 42.9 --- 4 13 4 " _ ' a g t 1 5 5 3 5, al 13% - 7 ------ at 96s od - 11S -=----- at gas od 27 --... at 94s od 262. 49 ---7-- at 93 i. od i 7b ——- at 83s oi l 551 --- at 90$ od 1 1I 7 3 8 4 702 ------- at 9os od I 369 • 7 603 —ar SO' cd - 1 40 • Total 71to Quarters.—Average,BSs. 3i -t• ss. Yid:lower thin last Return. .........."*° • A RETURN F FLOUR e s : o ffi. From Nov. 2.8, to Dee. 2; o from the Coact-o. , Sacks. s..d. ' Sacks. s. d. Sacks• 7 , :7 , , .I 47& - 85 of 1395 z --So o 2111 . 3 13 - 83 0 ' 31 0 - 7 9 - 0 / , -S ~ > 0 y . .„- ~ 16 -Sz o 761 -78 o .23" :„..:-.- 0 • 20 - St o) - -to -- 77 61 . 2 5 And ti Sacks at 73s..per Sw.k., 5 3 c1c• Totai--16z09 sacks. =Average 7 9 i. iol-d• Pe r • 45, iod. per SaCk lower than last weel _...„......"' . , • I'RICE 0F 1101'S. EA OA. - POCK STS• , i Kent, 31. i6s. to 41. los. Kent, 41. os. to 5• i 1,, ~ • 1 , to;' Sussex, 31. 3s. to 41. —s, SuSsex, 31; Os. to l i SS., 'Essex, 31. 7.i. CO 41. S. Farnham, 71. 0 .,. to 1......,... NEWGATE. AND, LEADENHXLL By tile Carcase. ' c n . 6s- Beet - 35.-6th to 4s. &t. Veal ' 44. Od-"" , - ) oi. Mutton 35. od. to ss, od. I P o rk 55 . Pa. t * 1-1 A „ K r • PRICE 01: LEATHER (per lb.) AT L'EADDI - ; 1 _" . Butts, 50 - to 56!b. each .. to. 18A. 74 A 7 4. * Ditto 56 tb 661 b. each - 23 ,1 - to O .- Merchants' Backs, - 9 L to 181.1' Dressing Hides, . - V d, d. Fine'Coacii Hides , ' %, ys Crop Hides, 45 to 401 b. for cutting ' J9' l ' Ditto, 30 to - - 17d• to t9S~ Calf Skins, 30 to 401 b. 26th, to 321, vet lb. Ditto,' 50 to 70lb. 34(1. to 39(1.. per lb. Ditto, 70 to 831 b. 33d. to 36c1-. pitf lb. Small Seals (GreCnland) 36.1. to 38th per lb. Large ditto, - to —s: per Doiena. Goat Skins, - to -s. Tanned Horse Hides, Ad. to 2:th per lb. _, ---- AW DES. to 2s. Id : Best Heifersand Steers R (p, sr. ) ( I I I Ordinary, zs. 0 - A ' 0- ' d Ca ." ' r 4 0 , 2s. tod. to 3s. o:I. 1 :Market Call, I * -- ,1,. od. ' 1 Middling, 25. 4d. to 2S . e.d. I Elig. Horse 15s•t ° _______----" piticg OF St. James's Market 6s. od. Clare Market 6s. • 0:;. Whitechapel Market ss,_ per style of 81b. TALLOW. ' A Town "f a ll o w rocS•o d :, ' Yellow Russia --0.,1. ‘Vidte,do. S. od ,/ Soap Li°. :—s. --.. o ,l ' ei• 5- Melt i ng Stull 553. '' ~ .s. Ditto rough 56). --i• Graves Lis. ott - . , G oo d Dregs !_is•.c,l-.' :tied,' t1.65.--Curd. 1.3":„4, i6s. od.---11lo!titt.:17 17s. I Id,. Average price' 3s. I*. Yellow Soap - , tr6s.—Mot . Price of.Capciles per dc.en, i • St. TAMES's HAY' MARKET, DA:c. to' Hay, 51. 9s. to 61. 83. od..—Aver. 51. tgs 3 oa . Straw, ios. oil. to a. o d.--aver. It- '. WHITECi-lAPEL HAY MARI,. Hay 51. os. od. to 61. os. od.--Aver. si• New, 01. os. od. to 01. os. od.:- Aver. 0/• °s• 6d. Clover, 61. 6s. ad. to 71. 75. od.—Aver. 61: it?: Straw, 11, los. od. .0.11. 16s od.—Ayer.-.