The Sun. — London, England, 1810-05-11 00:00:00

of time, andannt merit, was the fewidation of this to. reply to that charge. It had been stated by-the • • right was never acquiesced in. There was, there- gallan't General that if any officer in his regiment 'fore, no ground for Parliament to sanction the pro- had conducted himself in a similar manner with Cap . - - - dudion of these papers; above all, he hoped that tarn Foskett, he s h ou ld h av e t h oug h t i t ' hi s d uty to the Hodge would not be established as a pl ace o f ap- , - i peal for the Army. In refusing the production of neral k now th at C a p ta i n F oskett had desired a - these papets,• he was convinced he wou ld n e t so . Court-martial upon his conduct and had been re much incur the displeasure of the friends of Captain , fused ? 'With respect to the House not interfering I~oskett, as that of the illustrious personage and the with individual complaints from officers, why the COmmander in Chief, whom he would prevent from a House Certainly within :the last few years,. had ,not obtaining a Com j plete usti,fication. - ' • - much trouble of that kind ; very few cases, had a, : LAN as V. SAUNDERS. 'Mr. ABERCItoMBt said, that• it .was impossible come before them. Captain Foskett had m ide 'a pa This aCtion was bee by kr. Landfried, a .for the House to take any step inconsistent with its, plicatiou to his merciful and lepient - Coainatider as. respectable Thidesman in Craven Buildings, DturY-, ' . charamer ;it ,rather would be his duty to consult his Royal Highness had beeo termed, and what el- I lane, a;gziinsfyoung - Saunders the Equestrian ; to re the safety of the Army by not countenancing - such feet had that application prodoced ?,.. He had pre- cover 131. and upwards, for lodging. Measures.' •However lie admired the Weer) , efpro- , seined a tetition to the House, but they had refused, - Mr. Serjeant BEST, Who stated the case, said he motion by seniority, the pradice be believed ,-, :he ' thhtigli they allowed the patitioti to lie on the, table, did not think that Master Saunders, would ride off injurious. The coarse be should have. :• • - , ed to permit him to prove the truth of _the allegations on this ocCasionvk ; lili'the applause he had been -ac - would be, to stare to the House the v. ' is- Aega-, 7 contained in that petition. ,He had been condemned - cuStotined to receive at the Theatre.—The action is tiona of the officers on this stabjeO, and , then •have as an officer, as a gentleman, and as a mare by the brought for ledging(said time r eat uud Serjeitni), and moved resolutions against the responsible person. gallant. General, without behmgallowed to answer that h e says he is not bound to pay, because lie was an 11 the statements of the petitio 9 _ on the table against condemnation. The Hon. Gentethought'as.Cap' t. 1 infant; but.ailthough he was an infant, he is ari the Duke of Cumberland were true, liebroken was certain- F. had been sounmercifally• on the wheel, swera bl e f or ne c essa rie s. Ii will n o t be a question ly deserving of censure. - The House should observe - the_ least that the House could do wes;to give him the whether .a person: ought to be paid . :%'vho supplies an the situation it was in. lf the system of appeal was `opportunity of defending himself; and thereeee he infant with a bed. He is a young man of Merit as a encouraged, it would lead to injurious conse- , (Mr, W.) should-vote for the-motien. rider, , and when he- hired the apartments of, the qimences. . . 1 The CHANCELLOR of the EXC;HEaUEE observed, ' plaintiff', b e contracte d w i t h a ver y r e specta bl e man, . . Mr. Lyret ter ak, i n e xp l ana ti on , staid, that. he had : that - when a charge of 'systematic oppressierr was . Mr. Astiey, to perform at his Theatre. He was already stated it was not hisaiutention to make-a si- made against his Royal Highness - the Osike of ,to have fourteen - pounds a Week, and if he can earn nistee use of the papers. • Cumberland,, it. was not surprising .that .it should : that sum,' lie ought to have a decent bed to lie, on. Mr. MARTIN supported the motion of his pc- provoke tha t ; w hi c h was. co n s id e r e d a fa i r aoswer i There can be tie question whether th e room s Whi c h : . , Pourable Friend. The charges exhibit e d against to that charge. If the Hense had been in p osses - , h e hi re d were- fit for him. He was not by himself, the Command er i n Chi e f S nou ld :be eisher..Substan- sloe of th'efacts, of which they were'fiesw in pot- ! but had a cltere untie ; ' Till's was a 'Lady who ap tiated or falsified. As th e House had received the ' session;, when captain Foskett's Petition was pre- ' peared to be - his wife, and when she was found out petition, he did riot k ne a.vi l ow _it could refuse the sented, he thought they would nut have, allrAvedit :- to be so, we got rid of her. Mr. Abraham"-Satin papers now in question, and on -this principle he gave .to lie -on the 'table. When he said this,. he by . tiers, senior, sent his carriage, and took the Lady his vote. . ' • ! no means we n t the' length of th ose w h o contended, out as his son's wife ; . th er ef ore , if y ou find the . . General CEAwECED opposed the production_ of . th a t no mi li tary a b use oug h t to b e biought _before i fath er - sanc ti o n 'this conduct of his son, you w ill the papers, on the ground of the-whole pretending Parliansent. " With respect to the two distinct allege- i find your verdiet for the plantiff, as Imo is a respect ' franght with danger. : He, was perfectly eon? i tiens of Captain_Foskett . 's Petition, Captain F. had I able tradesthan. • - einced•that the Mike of Ctimberland and the Com- ' adpaiesced in the judg - nent upon them, and.had not ' Several' witnesses proved the plaintiff's case ; but 'Pander in Chief had no objection to their being wo- PPPealO from that judgment t o hi s Majesty. lie iit appeared, on then cros - saexamination, that Young ducecle,but he must net ert heless object to their :pro- therefere opposed the Motion. : §,tundvas was under the-protettiop of a Mr. Young, duetioil; feeling . as lie did; that the more detailed The Hon, Mr. Wat t p- and Mr. ABERCROMBIE 1 1- his guardian, a n d t h at l o d g i ngs .h a d b een prov id e d f O r the more .objedionable-Would the question - appear. explai ne d. • •' ' • .1 biin at the Red Lion, in Tetteitham-eourt-road, when Admitting these fads alleged, what then was want- I , Mr. LOCKHART contended that 'Captain Foskett e he hired the premises of the .plaintiff. It also ap ed with_ the papers ? The only cause which appear- ought to have tried whether the Ceurts of Law • pear e d alit the plaintiff had been warned not to re ed was, that a clause of the Mntiny Ad had: not would not issue their mandamus to the coma a ceive the defendant, by .his guardian, who been observed, and gaieVa r acea proceeding front the mander in thief, 'to lay his iVlemorial before his to be answerable fe- the lodging. . Duke of Cutubeiland, formed the foundation of all Majesty. . . • 1 . Mr. Serjeant VAUGEIAN admitted that the delete , the complaint...7he first part of the petition cum- i General LOFT opposed the Motion. • dant had occupied toe preMises ; but the defendant plained of his ,not being promoted, but it will ap- Mr; Pp m a d e a short reply, in which he ; was not ninateen (said Mr. Serjeanf 'Vaughan) at pear from ehe authority of Colonel Seymour that j expressed his confidence in the ,innocence, merit, ' the time, he took these apartment,. My Learned Captain Foskett was not at all fit for field ser- • and honour of Captain Foskett ; and again urged, Friend has made some alloaions on the moral cha iice, which statement was corroborated by.Colenel . both in justice to that Officer; and to the Duke- of ratter of the father; but I will shew you that the Grant. If thitigi were so in 1808; it - is not likbly ", Cumberland, the produe•tion of the documents for fither had provided suitable lodgines tor the young that they were better in:18 - 06, the time of which e which he had moved. , man, to prevent his lalli e g int o bad co m pa n y...-. Capt. Foskett complains. - . ,He 'next talks of baing ; On a division there appeared— - - When the defendant w'as asked 'what he wanted refused leave of absence,' but on_ this point it a w Ohne 1 for the motion - .8 apartments for ?he said l'o keeiecny Molly in." - Against it - , • - - 11 4 found that a . kw _ months before he had' obtained i . ' Under all the circumstances, he contended that the Majority - - • }cave; and it was bd.( fair that other Officers should _ a , . Jury ought not to sauetion, - by their -a erdict, the brought tire, R rt of mr.eeseteeTta , up se, . ep,o the have their turn before he could again 'obtai:4 it.— , . Committee of Supply. The Resolutions (respect- - I Sir JAMES . „ daintiff'a conduct. This was the reason he was thee refused. He now ' ... . Ein the Army 'xtraordinaries) 'were, after a she: t ' JAMES AIAN,FIELD: left 1,1 to the . Jury to say, wished to advert to the circumstances of tfie duel, which had "been mentioned on a former occasi o n,, conversation betweee Sir J. Newport and Lord . whether the lodging wa s n e ct a sar y, an d to fi n d t h e i r : which were alone 'sufficient to set aside his title to ‘Patmerstone, read and agreed to. verdiet,On that gr o u n d. Th e J ur y f oun d a ver d ict It,r the deter ! a l it i i • 1., promotion. The oldest officer in - the regiment The EMbezzlement Bill t.,‘ Cut through a ' ,m g d e ... ,in a: Committee, in w hi c h M r . R ose , , M r . - goes out as' keond to a sif. astern ; to, pre+ cu cussion t .. , . i this meeting • the civil - officers; had been sent H. Smith, Mr. Marryatt,- Mr. Pongotiby, the Soli down I tor-General, Sir J., NeWport, Sir C. Pole, and Mr, el to Weymouth ; the . parties concealed them- Croker participated. The report way ordered to be selves, and the next morning he,, g o e s ou t e as _e_ieed to-morrow. . one of the seconds to mere boys. They fired th receivedree , awe. WitaerroN \brought in a Bill to prevent fra u d s shots without effect, and then, as hether .at their in . flie_..inrydrt_ts:iot . i . and exportation . of British and own or his proposal, they advanced one pace, and : Itash Malt. Read "a first time, and ordered to be fired three more; One of the partiea . makings use of a , • i read . a second time to-morrow. pistol with hair trigger, for which alone be-deserved Mr: WitateroN brought up a Bill to take Off cer to ba hanged. If this were permitted, what Mest i fain duties on oil of vitriol. " The-Bill - was read a the army come to ? When a Gentleman . enters ' first time, and, after a . short.conversation between his son in the service, he naturally expects the Field Sir J. - Newport, Mr. Foster, arid Mr. Woarton, Officer will be a father to him; fur his part, he Should consider himself a disgrace to' the army if was ordered to be read a second dine to-morrow. Mr. Hunt's 'case was ordered- to be taken into be did not oversee the private conduct of junior • s officers ; and if ouch , a 'Carson was in his. regi- constderation on Friday next. meat, he would bring him- to a Court Martial, The other Orders of the Day were then dis ' in order to have him turned out of the - sent ice. posed of, :and at One o Clock this morning the The Hon: General contended, that taking. the . witole , Houle zdjoorned. of the case of Captain, Foskett. into consideration,- , and contrasting with' it the condud of his Royal - . Highness, the House musts be satisfied, that so far as regarded that. Officer. .hts Royal Highness had isle hayed with great forbearance and lenity, and that 1 the complaint against the CoMMander in Chief was equally unfounded, and that fur the House to inter fere as ith time complaint under those circumstances would be extremely injurious to the discipline of the army and to the service in general. , _ Mr. WARD ,vvas diaposad 'trot to accede to the motion of his Hon. Friatid, because. he conceived that he shoal(' thereby be.injnriug the service. He condenined.the :interference of this House in indi vidual cases. of military grievance; as tending to re lax military discipline, and as opening the doors to officers to obtain . notoriety, by complaints whether well or ill founded. For these reasons he should vote against the motion. . ' Sir J. PULTENEY expresaed a his conyi6lion from all that he had heard, of the necessity of rejecting the petition, convinced as he was that Captain Fos kett had made out no case of .hardship. His Royal Highness, in all that he had done, had, been guided .Solely.by a wish to preserve that discipline and re ; gularity so necessary for time well being of the army ; - and he stated, that -during-the command of his: Royal Highness, time regiment to which Fosieett • beloegs Ii ad been treated with greater lenity than at any former period. - . ' Mr. W. Satelau having voted for - the petition lying on the table, could not, consistently with that vote, refuse. the ,Papers, nor could he agree with - the Hon. Gentleman who preceded • Wert, that no case of the kind should be brought before the House. , The refusal to attend to complaints -of this nature, appeared to him- as . dangerous, as. to other Gentle: a men appeared the danger of inquiring into the com plaint. The hardships of which Capt. Fos-Lett com plained were a series of accumulated injuries, and therefore entitled to consideration: He thought that in point of justice the House ought to grant the papers. Act is peremptory on the Attorney.; ,that we must follOW the later of it. I -thought so at the trial there are, however, many : instances where the act of the Agent or Attorney .is same as -the act of a principal. How far that pay apply in thiS instance shall tie seen, so you way take your rule at any rate." - --Rule Nisi granted. • COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MAY 10. SITTINGS AT NISI PRIGS. Atl*J. s GRA , 132ND, rrAY 9. Arrived—the - George, Smith, from Malta, Sailed —the A lexander,•Rtithertorct, for Rio janciro ; and the M`Worth, Hawkins, tor Grenada. LAIP REPORT. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, MAY 10. METCALFE AND•OTHERS V. BRUIN. This was an aEtion to recover the penalty in a Bond of Indiimnity given by the defendant to the persons named • therein, being the Directors and Company of the Globe Insurance Society; to gua rantee the honesty of a person of the name of Wil kinson, aClerk in their employ. It appeared at the. trial, which was .in the last sittings of Hilary Term, that the person so guaranteed had been de ficient in his accounts, and minus to a considerable amount. Since entering into thebood some of the Direetors belonging to the Company died ; this was proved at trial,, when an objection was taken by the defendant's Counsel, that the plaintiffs could not recover under this bond, inasmuch as the un dertaking was given to persons who conld_have no surviving representatives ; because, although they were a chartered .body by virtue of an At of Par liament, they were not a corporate body. The Jury, however, found for'the and. this day the Attoiney-General moved •for a Rule to, ; sliew .causewhy that-verdict should not be set aside, and. a nonsuit entered. Hi, ground was the foregoing objection, and the Court thereon granted theßule Nisi. VINCENT V. SLAYMAKER. The cause of a'.•:tion here was the amountof an - Attorney's Bill of Costs, and was tried at the last Sitting at Westminster, when .a verdia wa4 found' for the defendant , under the diretition of the Judge. It was tried before Lord Ellenborough, when it having ni)peared that the Bill of Cosis for which the action had been brought, was not deliVerectto the defendant, signed by the plaintiff one month before the . action %as brought, as the A& of Par liament direls, the Jury, as above stated, found for the defendant. Mr. Toppi NG now moved, that the verdict should be - set aside, and anew trial granted. The Learned Counsel stated, that true it was the Bill Was not actually deliyered to the defendant in person, but it was delivered to his Attorney under a Judge's Order,..and he contended •tlat such delivery tbie same as if it had been dellyered to the defendant himself. Mr. WHITBREAD supported the motion on the ground of giving an - opportunity to Captain Foskett to have his case fully heard, and of course to pre. pare his,defence. When that Officer was arraigned of negligence and ill-conduct by the gallant General, it was but lair that he should be placed in a situation /CA 0 YESTE b Ela OA Y. : Bank Stock, India Stoat, Navy c per Ct. tcf 0)01 10; India Bonds, 21s. pr. Irish per Cent.. • Ettehettner IS. pr. 4 per Lent. 8 4i .. , er Cent. Iced (9 linperial 3 per Cent. oer ::.ent. Cons. yak a Ditto Ann. 6 ts-16ths 7 Bank L. Anil. 18 7-16 k 7.16 Cons. for z4th inst. 70 Lord ELLE . NBOROUGII.--!` I rather think that the DEPEJVCE OP .CAlV.thij,;ll.l BY AUGthTUS VON. KOTZEBUE. _ . , 1.0111,0 N Prirted by ItlCri A IZI) 11A1:12IS, ot,No. 4, Martlett..calrt, liow-street; and Published . 131 WILLIAM A RMI(.; K SCP.I PPS,-South Molton.street, GnA:verior4cuare, At tLe Sittc•OFFICE, No, I ill,' Strand,* where Afivertiseiiienis,- Orders for the Paper, Leiters fgr the Niko, &e (posilaid), must be ailirosed, • [The following whimsical Article is taken from "A" 1 " si kepositury - of Arts, Literature, and Commerce," a Work to which we ave before been inderited for soine'inte resting matter.] A ridiculons prejudice forbids -the eating of ha': man lie - sh; and so great is the power of this pier' dice, that Nature lier Self seems to revolt at nutritious and patat .ble food. Doubts In t Ve eve„' been 'raised whether eannibals. ei existed,. when the accounts of travelhi - S the most worthy';! credit placed this ciicunistanCe out ut al; (!Oubt, rE ),v4 then asserted, that the savages devoured i .orr but their enemies, and that the ['ala{al adi rretP7 of human fiesh.was (welcome only try I,irst revenge, But ilfis opinion is equally erropeouttq Abe. former. When Kiusenstern, the e'rcuunii4; gator, lay at anchor near the islands of New KahiT wa, was on the best terms- with t. e who devour their enemies ; and }et when any of l i'? crew were bathing, these islanders would stand UP on the shore, and oanifet the strongest desire to make a Meal of their wlrte" gue,ts. They did not to be sute•give , way to then desire, but their _war iag wis not the less. It is therefore not merely flesh of enemies, but human flesh in general, that e ‘ N" cited their undepraved appetite. • • Why should not man, the structure of whose stomach, as it is well known, perfectly curreSpond s with that of the swine, eat and relish whatever that animal does not - reject ? Is it deemed a disgrace to •man to _resemble !big - despised brute ? Would tQ God we had no other point of re.emb'ance . to it Oar! . this As long, however, as it cannot be denied that we, for-instance, areas fond o' breaking down every fence, in order t o d eso l ate our neighbotlt : field, so long I 'shall not be.able to comprehend why we should, be ashaMed of. its undiseriminaties voracity. Besides, this is not the tiiu to 1)6 , ashamed of any thing. There is now-a-days no W e ' eies 'of vi.ce but what has illustrious examples to plead in its excuse ; an d h owever lie stile w e may, ht% Jo imitation, that is to say, when the question.te ,lates to virtues, vet fashions and crimes al wiqs meet with servile-admirers and imitan rs ; and wilY should not an innocent'propensity do the sante It were, therefore, ardently to be wished I liat some potentate would resolve to s e t a goo d exam :le , and not merely to cut his fellow-creatures to p ieceS with the sword, but in int ore to grind them with his teeth; .and hen this useful custoio would instantly spread over all Europe.. The French, indeed, at the period of their Revolution, gave us nanny xcel" lent examples; they dev .urea the heart uT the Princess de Lamballe, and God knows what • sides; but these were only obA:u.re wietcbes, ttnguished for .nothing but this praise 7 Worthy dred• To this end, it would be absolutely necessary.that some celebrated character, who cares tot nothing, should crown his glory by giving an entrrtninn: ,, i , at which human flesh, roasted or fricasseol, shuulo be. served up With a 'sauce recommended in the •eil •mulzac des Gourmands. 01 what incalcalable benefit would such an ex" ample be productive, especially to armies ! In die first place, .the, troops would never want f.,od, thy - would find "a table spread for. them on the fivY of • battle. Secnnri:s,_ if th,y'thiitilti "barrien to 1-)'" pressed by hunger, they would fight with so mu , :b the more obstinacy; Because they would know tliati the;battle would be followed" by a feast, of which those who ran away would not prtake. ThirjiY , they would never be able to complain'tbai theY knew not what they were fighting for; since yu" Might always reply without hesitation, that rt was for victuals, and this would at feast be a rational cause. Fourthly, it would spare the pain's that .ear now taken to conceal the number of the killed, as the hungry victor would leave no trace of thew be hind.• Fifthly, the Commissaries might conscience purloin the provisions, for why sTI93- 11 °. they be carried after the troops when the enelPY himself is at the trout:le to supply them % it wouid be some consolarion to dying soldier's It) know, that they did not sacrifice their lives for iiit% ambition or thirst of dominion of their Princes, but that they would have the pleasure of feeding their • hungry fellow 7 creatures. It would be an easy mat-- ter to enumerate scores-of such advantages. But people ought by no means to confine theft'. .selvelo the devouring of their enemies, This to be sure is the practice of the savages, bui .we po lished Europeans have, within the last ten yea's ..made a very different sort of progress in civilization: consequently, in this point also we ought to leave the savages far benind us, and devour all OA conies' in our way, whether friend or foe. TM* again will be the source of numberless advant .A citizen, for example, who is doomed to be pil7 laged of every shilling he possesses, or whose wife and daughter-are about to be violated before his eyeii will be extremely glad to be previously devoured, and thus spared the trifling mortiticition of %,%ithes.:--- ing such common occurrences. How many r)t . the - inhabitants .of Lubeck woald, orr the 6th of No: vemberr 1 ao6, have rather been in the belnes ti French grenadiers than within tbe walk of theft" free and neutral imperial cily! And •what • benefit would not utiforturiate Prussia derive at tins mu- . , went, when her fields are mannred only with bloud, and sown with nothing - but human bones, if, in ihiS dilemma, her Miserable itihz.A)itants, were allowed ‘l ll 'eat one another ! What advantage would, result. - from the practice t o th e p e a s ants o f Livonia, who have lately been adyi,ed by - a professor at Docpx, so catch Irogs and cat eiglneeTt of !hem a:day ! What a consoLition would it t.):.:.t0 all Germans wi n ) .have child:en, if they might devour these wretched, free-born creatures before • slat'ery degrades theta into atijeet. flatterers! Some years ago I should perhaps have had some scruple: to bring forward such a proposal; but now --when .no honest German will deny 01:11 out 1110-,•' ral culture has retrograded st-vt.ral centuries—a we lanC.holy truth; which all the pimple in the wet td cannot conceal, and whi:h niuuntants of Lintel wreaths cannot smother —now,: ppi Dian, 'tliY proposal is a seasbilatile piece of advice;. Why suck _ . out people.'s blood by drops ?---itatnec dispaict; theca at once mai eat them up, than let. thenrcxpirt.; 0 1 bunge,T. - . . . . 3 . ~. , t~ 8181 US, At Cranstoun-hill, Scotland, the .Riglit Hon. Lady Janet vauchanan, •of a Daughter. On awl ist ult. at the house of the Dowager Lady Which, cote, at Grantham, the Lady of James Atty, Esq. of a Son. .On Monday last, at Hooton Park, Cheshire, the se.►t of Sir Thomas S. M. Stanley, Bart. .Lady Stanley, of a SOIL On Wednesdayfast, in Upper Baker-street, the Lady of Lieutenant-Colonel IVilliam Durntord, pi' the ict Regiment of Foot Guards, of apaughter. MARkIBU. _. Yesterday, at Queen-square Chapel, Bath, Jonathan El- Esq*. only son of 'Sir William Ellord, of B:ckharn, Devon, Bart. to Charlotte, only daughter ot the late John Wynne, ot Abercynlleth, Denbighshire, .Esq. and niece of the late Richard Aubrey, Esq. of Clehonger j in the County of Heretbal, - • tin the 26th ult. at Etifi~!d .; Charles Edman, Esn. Igo Surgeon of His Majesty's ship Russell, .to Miss Powell, On Friday last, Thomas Apperley, Esq. of Bermondsey, to Miss Adon, of Ludlow. . . _ The same day, at Aldermaston Church, [Wm Berkley Monck, Esqi. of Coley Park, near Reading, to Mary, eldest daughter of William Ste?liens ' Esq. of Aldermaston. On Tuesday the Bth inst. by the Rey. Harry Grey, the Rev. Edward Stanley, Redor of A lclerley, in the County of Chester, to Cathe!ine, eldest daughter of the Rev. Oswald Leycester, Reaor of Stoke, Salop. • On Tuesday last, at Bisham Church; the Right Hon. Lord Bolton, to the Hon. Maria Carleton, eldest daughter of the late Lord Dorchester. The same day, at Wandsworth, I. .—Rucker, Esq. of Mincing-lane, nephew o: O. El. Rucker, Esq. of Melrose. Hall,. Surrey, to Ann, eldest daughter f the late Stephen 13encraft, Esq. of Soutnampron.ro , Bloomsbury.. On jhe Stli inst. at 13allingarry Laurel', the Rev. John Croker, of Croon Castle, to Mahella Catherine, eldest daugh ter.of the Rev. John Graves, of Fort.Williarn, in the County of Limeiick. Last week, in Bedfordshire, Chevalier Lempriefe, of the ancient Order of Sr. Louis in France, to Miss Maria Fro bisher. MAD. On Thursday night, the 3d inst. William Curry, Esq. So. licitor, Sothanyton. On Saturday- morning, in Saville-row, the Hon. Mrs. Gunning, wife of George Gunning, Esq. and sister of Lord Bradford. On . Sunday last, Mrs. Anna 'Rude, widow of Henry Hurle, Esq. late of Pentonville, aged 6s. The same morning, at Waltharnstow, aged sz, Nathaniel Trougloon, Esq. "rite same day, Gustavus Adolphus Trotighton, in the 23d year of his age, youngest son of Richard Troughton, Esq. of the Custom-house, London. His death was occasioned by a blow he received against a post on the Tuesday evening pre ceding. On tVlonday night last, Aubrey Joseph Lum, Esq, of Steward street, Old Artillery Ground. • On Tuesday. last, at , her father's house," at Markfield, Statnford-hill, the wite of Mr. Charles Deacon, of Milk— street. The same evening,-at his 'house in Leeds, Thomas Ma. thewman, Esq. laie . of Wakefield, in. the 75th year of his age._ . . - _ _ - "Ori the gth inst. Mrs. Levesq . ne, ,of Spital.square. On the' isth of January last. in Island of St. Lucia, Captain E. K. Matthews, of the fitli West. ndia Regiment, eldest son of the late Etherington Thomas Matthews, Esq. of St. Catherine's,' Jamaica. _ ►' i 4~ j ~ *t, ~~k3 ; ~ .x An N a It: 1 1 l str \ r e( r t 7 at , ~W A~ T 1 I. 1 1