The Sun. — London, England, 1818-05-21 00:00:00

eARLJAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS, WEDNESDAY, DRAY 20. .NIISCELLANEOUS. Counsel were finally heard in the Scots Cause of " Thompson v. Somerville."—Judgment post poned. On the Appeid of " &iris of Siremyss and I‘l4reh tt a E:srl of 1-Imtdington and others," their Loidships judgment was to affirm that of the Scots C;font. At!er ihe resuming of the House for Legisla tine business, The Eat' of CAARLF.VILLR pre Rented R Petition horn the County Of Carlow, complAiping of the injurious and oppressive tendency of tl►e IVindoa• Tax it► Ireland, and praying relief with respect to the satne. The Nisirquis of DowNsni AR presented two Pe titions to the same eff ct—one from the Borougl of Newry, and the other from the City of Lon donderry. The Charitable Education and the Offenders' Conviction Bilk Were brought up from the Com• moos, by Mr. Brougham, Mr. Bennet, and other Members, arid severally read, the first time. The Etrl ROSSLYN moved the printing of the first mentioned Bill, and intimated his intention, atter rite prints should be on the table, to pur pose an early day for its second reading. • Mr. LOCKHART, accompanied by several Mem bers, deliverer' a Message front the Commons, rego , st i ng t h at Lo r d Montfort he permitted to attend the Anti-Monopt , ly Committee of the /louse of Commons, for the purpose of Exami nation. The Lott!) CHANCELLOR having previously put the toesiion, informed the Messengers that their ‘v.uld send an answer by Messengers of their own. The Earl of EARROWBY presented a Petition from Ashford-under-Line, in favour of the Cot ton Ma [luta ct ories' Regulation Bill.—Referred to the Committee. The Earl of LIVERPOOL moved the Order of the Day for their Lordships resolving into a Committee on the New Churches' Bill.—The Earl of SHAFTESBURY accordingly took theChaie. Their Lordships then proceeded to consider and discuss the various clauses and provisions of the Bill, and in the course of the sitting; which was of cot,sidetahle length, several amendments, but chiefly of a verbal nature, were made in the Bill. Oo the motion of Lzml GRENVILLE, a promise was agreed to by the Committee, that the deci sion of the Kiug in Council should .be final and effectnal, respecting the Division of Parishes. A proviso teas also adopted, on the motion of the saute Noble Lord, to the effect of saving and exemptiog the rights of Brazenose College, Oxon, from the operation of the Hill. Lord HOLLAND gave notice of his intention to move, in a future stage of the 15111, for the intro duction of a clause, whit h was read by his Lord ship, and the principal effect of which was to do away the penalties and disabilities imposed by the A f t o f the 13th of Charles 11. called_the Conven ticle Act, on persons hni!rting Churches or Cha pels for the service of the Church of England, or to which persons were liable, for attending the same. The Rill having passed, the House resumed, and ordered the same, wi , h the amendments, to be printed. The second reading of the Queen's Council Bill was' fixed for Frit! y, and the Lords ordered to be summoned for that day ; and the bearing of Counsel, &c. relative to the Cotton Manufacto ries' Bill, was ordered to take place before an open Out-doors' Committee he Bias upon the (aide being respectively for warded, the House adjourned 111 to-morrow. HOUSE OF COMMONS. Mr. KIRKPATRICK, from Ramsgate Harbour, presentet Accounts of the Receipts and Diibursenieuts of that Har• boor. —Laid on the table. Mr. P. MOORE presented a Petition from Coventry, pray ing that Nlembers of Parliame).l should render an account of their Steward,hip to their Constituents.—Laid on the Table. FEVERS IN THE METROPOLIS. Mr. BENNE I'. in presenting the Report of the Committee on Fevers e the Metropolis. stated, that th ;liquifies of the 'Committee had been extended to the Hospitals and Fever In stituri.m, and hat in the cour-e of the year feverS•had alarm ingly increased to seven times their ordinary number. This was in a great measure owing to the practice prevalent in hospitals to mix contagious cases with colionon ones,. Not only had patients died, but nurses, medical attendants, and students themselves, had fallen victims to the fevers which they had caught. The free circulation of air which was wanted to prevent fevers, was injurious in chronic disorders, and yet froni want of room it became necessary in most hos pitals to mingle all patients. The Committee were of opi nion, that if it were possible to remove the fever cases from the rest, the spr.ea , 'ing of the contagion would he considera bly checked. To this duvet, though on a very limited se:Jr, the Committee reqnested that Government should give 20001. to the Fever Institution, besides the 10001. granted last year, in order to enable it to increase the number of beds from 69• to 10n. He trusted that the attention of his Majesty's Mi visters would he turned to this recommendation, as the Fever Institution was of all others that which required the most as sistance from the country. He then moved that , the Report be primed.—Agreed to. . The second reading of the Customs Consolidation Bill was postponed to this day three months. • The Report of the Committee on the Madder Duty Act was lA - Might up and :weed to. The Icentrts of the Committees on Silk Manufactures, and on the London Coal Duty Act, were also brought up and agreed to. EDUCATION OF THE POOR. In moving the third reading of the Bill for the Education of the Poor, Mr. BROUGHAM said, that the Bill only went as far as an Inquiry, and that it was his intention afterwards to ground further proceedings upon it. As soon as a foundation should have been made by tke appearance of the first Report, he should take an opportunity, without waiting for the others, of introducing such immediate measures as the necessity of the case might require. For it would do but little good to wait till all the abuses had been pointed out, and then to send them to Courts of Equity. The Bill was then read a third time and passed. The Salmon Fishery Bill was read a third time, and passed. -Dublin College Paper Duty went through a Commit tee.—Report to-morrow. DISCHARGE OF FERGUSON. The Prder of the Day fur bringing up Thoinas Ferguson having been read, Lord A. HAMILTON said, that if it had not been the prac tice of the Chair to reprimand offenders in cases like the pre sent, he should have moved that Thomas Ferguson be repri manded, but as that naturally devolved to the Chair, he should merely move that the• said Thomas Ferguson be called • in and di,charged. The niotion•having been agreed to, Thomas Ferguson was introduced at the Bar. The SPEAKER. rose and said :—Thomas Ferguson, this Huse has received the Report of its Committee of Privileges, re pecting the letter which you have.written to a voter of the county of Lanark, with a view to influence his vote at an election. This House has resolved, that in writing such a letter, rn have been guilty of a corrupt attempt against the freedom of election, and of a high breach of its privileges, and has committed you to his Majesty's - of • Newgate; your Petition has been received, and in consequence of your contrition, and of the full and complete.acknowledgment of your offence, and in the hope that what you have already suf fered will operate as a warning to you, and as an example to others, this "louse is willing to extend to you its lenity as well as its justice, and I am to acquaint you that you are - dis 'charged on payment of your fees. Thomas Ferguson then VOired, and on Lord CASTLE REAGII's motion, the Speaker's Reprimand was ordered to lie entered on the Journals of the Ilonse. . _ . Lord A. HAM ILION presented a retition from Inverness in favour, it was understood, of a Reform in the Scotch Burghs. PANTHEON THE. VI RE: Sir F.. BURDETT presented a Petition from Mr. Candy, proprietor of the Pantheon Theatre, stating, t hat baring ob tained a licence for °petal ic performances, he had expended a capital of 55,0001. in the concern, and carried on public re presentations for five years without having incurred any blame. But that on the change of the Lord Chamberlain his licence had been withdrawn, to.his great detriment, with out any reason whatever being assignedfor such a proceeding. He therefore played that the House would appoint a Com mittee to inquire into the allegations of his Petition, with the view of presenting an Address. to his Royal Highness the Pi ince Regent on the subject. The Petition was read, laid on the table, and ordered to be printed. General FERGUSON presented Petitions from the Town of . . . Copai in Fifeiliire, and that iif Brechin, in Scotland, in fa vour of Reform in the Scotch Boroughs.—Laid Oil the table. 0 tiso I,EI'E STATUTES, Sir J. NEWPORT moved that the Lords of Sessio , s, the Judges of the Courts of Justiciary, and the Barons of the Ex chequer in Scotland, be directed to cause, within - six weeks after the openim; of the next Session, a statement to he made of such pasts of the Statute Law of Scotland ?nd Ihe United Kingdom as the Scotch Courts have considered to be in: de suetude, and no longer binding on the people of that count ty, and also a statement of the authorities on which they gruntid.- cd that opinion. After fewolarrtations from Mr, Bathprst, Mr, Abtr- . _ crumbie, Mr. Wm. Dvindas,Lord A. Hamilton, Lord Binning, Mr. J. P. Grant, Mi. Boswerl, Mr. Wynne, Lord Castle.: reagh, and Sir S. Romilly, Sir J. NEWPORT replied. He denied that, the pre s ent time was inconvenient fur the inquiry, and 'cotttended that the question involved none of the difficulties attributed to it. He would strike out the word " considered," and take the sense of the House on his motion. • Atter a few words in explanation from Lord Castlereagh, and some remarks from Mr. Douglas, Lord Castlereagh moved the previous question. Sir S. ROMILLY objected to the suggestion of. Lord Castle reagh of appointing a Commission by the Clown... Sir .1. Newport, Mr. Bathurst, Mr. Boswell, Lord A. Ha milton, and Mr. .1. P. Grant, re-urged must of the points that had been previously argued; after which Si► .1. NEWPORT said, if .nothing was done by 'Ministers at the commencement of the next Session, he would himself bring the subject before the House. The previous question was then carried. The Irish Grand .lury Presentments Bill was re-committed, and ordered fur further consideration on Friday. PARDON OF SLAVES.. Sir S. ROMILLY muted an Address to the Prince Regent for a Copy of the Opinion of .the Attorney-General of Domi nica given to the Governor in :March, 1817, on the power of the Governor to pardon Slices condemned by their Masters to work in chains. on the public works, with a Copy of the Letter on which such Opinion was founded. After a few words front Mr. Marryatt and Mr. Goulburn, the Motion was agreed to. PUNISHMENT OF SLAVES. • Sir S. RomILLY rose to move that a Select Committee be appOinted to - take into considera tion certain Vipers laid before the House relative to the treatment of Slaves in. the of Nevis, and to report thereon to the House. He was surprised to understand that there was to he "any opposition to the motion, after the -- statethent he bad made (ma former evening, proving the cruelly exercised towards two male and two female slaves. Here the Hanourable and Learned Gentleman repeated the statement which we gave in detail at the time, relative to the severe flogging of two negroes, for recriving two pair of stolen stock ings, and the subsequent flogging of tw o w omen , their :datives, for shedding tears at their punish ment. It was important to inquire whether, when such cruelties occurred, and the 'parties were brought to trial for it, justice was impar tially administered. In this case of Mr. .Ilug gins, all the circumstances in mitigation of the defendant's conduct were completely disproved at the trial,. and yet the .Jury acquitted him. The Assembly had thought proper to send home their account of the transaction, and to add not only the speech of the Counsel for the prisoner, but to add their own comments, in notes. It was not the character of Mr. Huggins that he impeached, hut that of the Jury. It was proved on the trial, that the men who were fi , ,gged were so ill on the next (lay that it was necessary to send them to the Hospital; and yet it was said, that they went the next night to a masquerade, though no such ciecunist ince was adduced in c‘idence. But the Agent for the Island had.also sent other palters on the subject to the Secretary of S'tate's Office ;. and tie Assembly had recorded in, their minutes Huggins's speech in his own defence, a speech made.pievious to the trial. • But the Houle would not be surprised . at this when,th:2y heard of whom the Assembly was composed: the Speaker was one of H. , ggins's bail, another member was Ed ward litiggins, his father, the next was his son, another was his brother, another Mr. Clarke, his retained Counsel ; and, in shrirt, all the rest were persons who were connected with bin), and took a lively interest in his tate. The Governor had, also written a letter, laying, that he was satisfied with the verdict ;' and, on the whole, he ,would put it to the House, whether tile whole subject did not exhibit evidence of the grossest partiality, on the part of the constituted authorities, and that the verdict could not he consistent with the oaths of the Jury. The Counsel had said i •-that there never was a country where any unnecessary interference between master and.slave could•be more improper and prejudicial than on this- island, and that it was greatly to be lamented that such subjects should be agitated. He argued that the Jury .were not justified in returning their verdict on such an assumption, and that the Governor and Council seemed to have sacrificed themselves on behalf of Mr. Hnggins ; and if it were only for the citcutnstance of two poor female slaves having been flogged for conduct which, in the eyes of the rest of the world, would be deemed highly meritorious, he thought inquiry ought not to be refused. Mr. GOULBURNI argued, that it would not be proper to judge persons by a Committee of that House, where no evidence could he adduced of their conduct. The Papers were, in his Opinion, entitled to no consideration beyond the facts ad duced before the Jury on the,ttial, and it required no further examination here. He repeated his former observations on the subject, and con tended, that if there was any blame attached to the contents of the Papers, it rested with those who sent them. It was extremely inexpedient for the House tc re-try a case without evidence, in which evidence had been submitted bawl; the proper anthoritieo in the country where it was tried. He shonld have no objection to the mo tion, Provided the duty assigned to the Committee be to exclude themn from the re-trial of the case, which had already been tried before a competent tribunal. Mr. Wtessztivoete implored the House not tsi adopt the Opinion that it had not the power to in - - quire into the administration of Justice abroad as well as at home.—[Mr. 'GO - vetivers; denied that he had given such ran opinion, and repeated what he had said.]—lfe ‘vas to unaerStand ills Honourable Friend had not laid down stic`h a doctrine; he must have misunderstood him. lint if an inquiry was not tfl be gone into, for what purpose had the Papers been produced ? It was clearly proved that justice was not impartially administered in the %vest Indies ; and it ever there was a case which called for the mo , t serious investigation, it was that made out by these Papers. The Hon. Gen tleman then arened, at some length, on the mis representations by which eve were deluded as to the happiness and kind treatment of the Sieves, and that there . was no place but the Home of Commons where the. real-administration of juts !ice in the Colonies could he investigated. , Ile thoufelit-if a little too murk t,, believe. what had been stated, that Mr. Hnegins had bought an ese t.tteof M rs . {twilit), and paid 16,500!. to gratify the Slaves, in their wish to become his property ; and that she, out of humanity, in Wishing to transfer them to so good amaster, had consented to take 35001. less for it than ihe Could' have gut front any foUty else; lie cOncludetf with declaring Ire felt it to be•one of the most solemn duties the House could exereiseeto attend to the welfare of those poor creatures, and to see that the admi nistrationof justice was nut perverted with in . pilot Mr. Govt./IL/RN and Mr. NVILBERFORCE seve rally explained. Mr. Matte , / sTT did not think the case called for the investigation of the House ; with respect to the observations of the Hon Gentleman about the sale of the estate to Mr. Illiggins, 'here was a good reason for the Lady letting him have it for 165001. rather than part with it to another per sett for 20,0001, 'and the reason was rather differ ent ; front a principle of humanity towards the slaves he insist the money - down for it.—(Lingle left—When he had sold slaves, he invariably parted ivith them to masters of their own chtece, and sold them on that account for a great deal less than he could have obtained for theni it he had not given way to their feelings. He therefore would wish Gentlemen were not quite.so incre dulous as to the fact of philters' .making sa crifices on the score of humanity. The pro ceedings against Mr. Huggins had been or dered by that very Governor and House of r‘seaibly that had been accused of a par tiality in his favour, but its this instance he thought that partiality could not easily be de tected. From examinations taken betore the Ma gistrates previous to the trial, and from afhtl.svits subsequently mule, he contended the ease of Mr. Huggins had been much exaggerated, as, though the number of lashes inflicted on the offending negroes for the felony and burglary they had com mitted was certainly great, it appeared that many had suffered as much who bad only received 30. lashes. They were known to have been at a, mask. and dance on the next night, and on the following Monday both had gone to work without being de sired to tlo so. For the punishment inflicted on the women, he must say to bins the story appear ed very improbable. • That they should have been flogged merely because they commiserated the sufferings of collets . was too outrageous for be lief. • But if the truth were this, that they had been exciting others to acts of insubordination— it it were their object to overawe the Manager its the performance of what he considered to bellis duty, then he thought some slight punishment might be necessary. Eh was not one of those who thought the mother country ought not to look vigilantly to the treatment of the slaves its the Colonies; but he considered public discussions on such subjects very injurious, and this there fore was the last course that ought to be resorted to, when an application ao that department of the Government to which the superintendence of. the Colonies was confided had failed.- The language held On the emancipation of slaves by the African Institution, and by persons generally in this country, he was likewise of opinion might do much evil, as it went to break the charm that.bound the slaveeo his master; and to excite in his mind an idea that• any effort he might make It eman cipate himself would be considered perfectly justifiable ; and in consequence, at no distant period, such scenes as had already been witnessed in some parts of the West holies might ensue. He proceeded at length to show the etfectselikely to arise frOm treating this subject as it had been treated. Under all-the circumstances of the case liecould see no grounds for any interference on the part of the House on the present occasion. When a case of real abuse should be brought for ward, be would be ready to second a motion- for taking such steps as the justice of the case mi t demand. At present he was of. opinion too inytity Has to the verdict which had been called in ques tion, seemed justified by the facts which had tran spired. - • • • Mr. Gott:sole said be never beard a speech with greater pain or regret than that of the Hon. Member' who had just concluded. He defended the African Institution front the charges directed against it; and advocated the cause of the .Negro population. The Hun. Member had spoken of the reign of opinion, butt it ought to. be recol lected, that that reign coul d only be maintained in favour of the ..whites by mildness, humanity, and gentle treatment. As connected with the West Indies ) he protested against being mixed tip with some - of the doctrines supported by . . the 1 - lonourable Gentleman. This case•demanded in• quiry, and be could scarcely believe his ears when he heard the Honourable Gentleman deity that it did,' and defend the cruelties that had been de tailed. ' • • Mr. BARHAM was glad the motion was brought forward, as much . . information would thus be gained, and great 'good done by his Honourable and Learned Friend. In the surall islands the laws might be overpowered by individuals, and it a remedy was, not.arplied by: the local authaities, the British legislature was the only resort for • t iett VeStigation and .crrreetiOn. Lie OnlY , ei that the conclusion d rawn f rom single itist Bl ' e a , of reported abuse would not be utride More e% te t b sive than the premises warranted, and tha t sA d chas•ges onlp would be brought forward es c 0 0• be met and answered. He wished to s ee the , verontents of the s m a ll er i s l an ds consol idate he and made a 3 good an d e ff ect i ve as those of ( of large' colonies, where the state and condit ion the slaves was bett e r ti tan th a t of thy pea stajt or labouring poor of this country. jA Mr. W. COVIITENEY considered the Case a -ne , e. whieli the house w a s c a ll e d u pon to inter":`, To form a proper judgm e nt on it, they 0"g 11- 01 , confine themselves to the Lilal. All theciiell stances of palliation brought forward by en I to Gentleman were founded either on exaMitte;r•to taken betore, or affidats made after it. l evidence before th e J ur y vi had proved that fitlO - r ( had been guihy o f t h ose acts of cruelty Which 01,.e now stated to be s o preposterous as to outl, belief, and,siuce they had, notwith4ten 4 i",,' tii quitted him, it was fit that an inquiry . iA teal nature of the transaction should take V lc A e 'i' order to ascerain what was the state of the I -111 nistration of -Ititice in that Island. tbs 111 r. WAR RE expressed his astonishmen tl •ott frequently epeated assertion, that the coodiboet, of a slave in the W e st I n di es was f re quentlY ti r ter titan that of a peasant in Europe ; es tier any circumstances that was possible' d e was decidedly for an inq u iry i n t o the ei rc " stances of the present case. ld, e ; illr. W. :.•.MITH surportell thelllooo2l , a tended the propcie;y of such iavestlgatio'c'er l'atliament. lie denkthey d that had 4 1 1 . f p deney to protinte insutrections. Even th e i det. (pent e ff usions of Pi t t an d F o k were tene t . f . el ,ir by such constquences as sortie Getidelllgni ills peered to apprehend from the eloquence prcsent Pathament. t Air. A. BitowNE did riot mean to say - • bee punishment of the women might not 1) 4 " jol ° diFpensed With. H e should not now ent er 0 14 a discussion on the treatment of slaves or ludic islands, but hoped that auo'b er bee° portunity would arise. It any perismis guilty of improper Curldilet let them be s ► „iIV with,the Censure of that flutist, and the ment of the hits s. • lill • Sir SAMUEL RoMILLY briefly replied. -•,-ty not mean to Col; de um he conduct, of nis Md";', 12 4 ' Ministers. It was pos s ild e th at there lo i i`; i Ji.f , other papers on th e slit+ ct, but he did 11 ,''',(00 that that. was th e f act ; b ut t h e paper s lai‘"„t the House a pp eare d to hi m to . b e establish the case whi c h h e h a d b rou ght l' ir° l o l° ' Mr. GOULBURN said a few words-it , dible Pone of voice ; hut was u n d e rstood t° oie in conclusion, that he should not resist th e Lion. To The question w as th en put twain Chair, and the motion was agreed to ne hliljt sentieule. LABURERS' WAG'S' r Mr. O r. J. P. GIiANT, anve: ted Circon's. oe :O. of the Bill which he had introdu ced rel"6eo the payment of Lihouters• IV,c;4es throNn out in the [Huse of 1;o:chi, o "t is3l‘ consid-table misappiehension had pr,voileci ( the object of this Bill, A diffi cu l t) had occ"rfe him in tie Bill which he had difficulty ft being unable to n:event the theouvroiel'oe mak tog Notes of tile Bank of I'l:viand sild i t ßelr try Bankers 1 gal tenders. This 01,jectioo 1,01 ho'vever, been removed by a, H„,. Yrel%le his, out in this }louse, ho had talirn Ole ) 0 5 ' to frame a clause which obviated the ch. a l ee- rio by merely providing thutY•nts made Of of England Notes, or those( l ) l ;" ( ConsitrY, 13 , A7 should be exempt front the penaltie* 011'1e ' - a fie moved for lease to brim iA this W l !' s Mr. BAN:NG - rot , : wished that the opt tat'')lltley the Bill were more extensive, and coctiprilcii labonrers.of every kind. Alderman Wool) concurred in this wish• f tb e Mr. J. I'. GRANT said, the ma i n ohjec t , o Bill was to make the existing Acts etfectoni:dll4 concurred in thinking that it would tit' de- o tr i : to extend the operations of the. Hid, h at „ 1 / 1 1 Bering the late period of the Session, it better to postpone any extension of the ' - '„ l .. 1 . ‘ :0 0 1 another time, when it Could he more „ , considered by introducing a separdte E lll. Leave was then given to . bring which was accordingly btoight in, anCi and second time.—Urdered to be ctinin h ' l morrow. • of ALIEN BILL. - no r , Mr. LUSH NGTON ropo3ed t h a t the .tenor, t(/' _.....,,,,,m - ro:i py the the Alien Regulation 1.1;11 should be recei morrow. bee t , Mr J. I'. Gr,ANT had expected 113 ha l ve 4116 afFordecl the opportunity of moving die c i - r° : withdrew last night ; if he could not 6 : sO t '‘ night, his professional duties would P r-vgli , . or. altogether. - • • ~„ OP do Mr. LUSITINGTON consented that 0 ° - I ", 00' should now be received, and it was 10 • accordingly. .e► ` lei 5. • Mr. J. I'. GRANT then moved his eh° :it 14° detain it not to be his intention to di viae r ec o4 the. House, as he only wished (0 . ve ; his opinion. Tbe object of it was to P r c e- ,, c i r e, ° ' record in tjie o ffi ce Of the Secretary of ' -- A liea f ' the reasons for transporting any partiCHlO.-bofor6 a copy of which record should hr lai d -- i Pailiament, and referred to a Committee. ,reo a The ,clause having been brought up, i 2 Vi' d ° l 0 1° . first iil4le : the question was then put, . 1 ' 11 " 1 ,' rejected without a division. • patY i On reading the .report on the Vinegars lib Arts, Mr. 3. P. GRANT ,asked if any r, e ro - re P : been . taken regarding the new llanala"—l vva' Vinegar from w ood,, to ascertain whether I 5 , Or was nor.liable•,to duty? , - (re 5 0 1 • Mr. LUSUINGTON answered that , a r lit 0 " 1 difficulty, it , had been decided that it ' sr° - ,4 4 to duty in•proportion to its strength. • j t 0-. The Duke 3f Kwit% anunity B*l '1 ' sec °a- 1- , Committee to-morrow. the 01, 1 1 ptS t ' Mr; Bll.PGDEN'presented a .• • from Proprietors of Drltry-I Floe T 1 P . llLt • mn i ).*., Varn a- el d i Aid. it was referred to a tiOn7* t t . t e -% )ra-1119, . and ii C i tu .h s: a o titu r r Q ii o r t i l t' a r t s IQ ' t l i l : e ttr i- ( l .l 4:) l l ' ' t :r • e l• L' s . ‘ ;:i 't: g h i ' ' e n - e * " h rcug ll' -- . '''‘ • Or). 29 , , LONDON: rrioled 3.13. CAKSTAARS. of l' d th by S 4 itli Ormond-street, Queen-squaru: and pliblis 6e- 0 1 " SCRIPPS, of No. Smith Nlolton-strea. at Of •Oifice ; No. 112. Strand - ;-.whvre.Adveltis e a le9"' Ltmrs, &c. (post-l i mit') must b.c whirastcd. i~ I\r tivt -L. 7,ei ~ii t 'rellt Y il f, - vt , , „, c , 4 0 b . ; '"ic t t p j t hat tsp :ro4;: 11 ei. ti 0J 4\,, t4 , 6, ti , o tt , tI„: 4 1g , kit' p i aid P ad Clot % itti Ort et, s )1 41 14 Le 4 °le .u 4l te. 4(t . ki t '44ere Sh th dh t ut h 111"tid ttl Lth v:7 t :, 44 4 ;„ Lt 1,17;