The Sun. — London, England, 1810-11-10 00:00:00

LAID \REPORT. of BENCH, NOY 8. TEIE•KIIG V. PHILLIPS. 1 t i '- - . Ti 1: N Mr: A" - -11EN"- GP:NERAL silt-wed cause against ..„ . . ~ , „ a rode otita nod by Mr. Serjeant Leas, against the '. , (1. >o :dal! ? wiy he shonlif not show by what right ` 1 Le c ii.l,ed to be a member of the Common Conn ...t 1 ell of 13 ver'ord-West :—The elettion of the De ~I UI I . :lrlant, and several others, took place under the foil() yin circumstances ;---The Mayor, to _be o)r-. re.:t :it Ike pH, applied to a; Barrister (a Mr. Jonea) for his ass stance nn the occasion. A gentleman put a question to .the defendant, kchrthet he had rec•.ived the Sacrament during that : year? He re fused to ans.rer, on which the same gentleman de- cl.ired that the defendant, Or the other candidates, cnuld not br, eletted, without declaring whether they bad or had not.. received the Sacrament previous to the el,-Ction.• He alSo stated, that he had ;n his pos session a ease whichwas confirmed in the Court of King's Bench, to that effect ; the, Mayor and- Mr. Jones repeatedly-c=illed on him to let them see the case, which he .refu , ed ; and Mr. Jones not being aware of such a one being to existence, advised the. Mayor to adjourn the poll to the following day. Between the adjournment and the meeting next day, tote defendant and some other candidates re c2ived the Sacrament privately at La , ly Kensington's house. This was what the Learned Serjeant's clients complained of. Ile. .(Mr—Attorney.-Ge.ner.ll) field in his band the affidavits of the Mayor and of Mr. Jones, who positively deviled that they adjourned the poll with the intention 01 giving the dekndant an opportunity of receiving the Sacrament ; but that they did it to give themselves an oppOrtunity of being made acquainted with. the case mentioned by the gentleman, and which- , he refused to skew them. Mr. Jones, during the evening, searched for it, and found it. It' was, The King v. Hawkin , , and - did not bear on the case ; and so be declared at the ite c tiog on the foll , wing d iy, when the poll was opened, and the defend.int elected. But•suppose, said the Learned CAunsel, the defendant had not received the Sacrament doritg' adjournment, his ele6tion would remain good, for the Ad of . Indem nity (the 50th Of the King) sets forh; that any p.,:rson electe :, and who received the Sacrament before the veer 1811, should be competent to till such situatio3s to which they had been so chosen. Lord ELLIOf4BOROUGH—" I think there is some thing intrirate in Ih;s case, and that it ought to come I.).:fore the Court in the fulleq mAnnt-r-; I 1 theretoie• the rule on;lit to be nrtile ab soiule, which will emible us to have it ;argued at knot h. . , • Riile made abiolute. • 'THE KING V. 110ACH. Mr. ATTORNEY-GENERAL-- , " This is a similar case to the IS,t; except that 'the defendant did re ceive the Sacrarrient be:ore . the first day of elettion,. which - does away with the cOmplaint; and of coarse the Ride molt - be discharged with cost;." Mr. Serjeant LEt4s acl:nowledged that the .state mein of .Nlr. Attorney-Gt'neral'was true, but the de fendant had deceived the complainants by refusing to answer whether he had or had not received the Sa - crament.. Lord ELLENBOROUG tr—" I cannot. ho!d, Brother L'os, that a candidate at an election has a right to answer every queston pin to - him by-his electors, or a party oppos6.l to Rule dismissed With costs. THE KING.U. RICH. Mr. GLEADE moved for a Rule to stew cause why the verdic thiS indi;;Ament should not be set aside, or a new trial 'granted. It was tried be fore Mr. Justice' Le Mane 'at * the last assizes at Oxf;a - d, apd a verdict given for the Crow:n. It was au indiament against two ladies, of the name of Rich, for not repairing a bridge in Berks. He te•ould not contend that, -as the owners of the ma nor, they were not obliged- to repair; but 'he would, that they. o .:re not liable to rebuild. In the present case, the 'bridge was blOwn down' by the vis'ta:iun of Gal, which could not have,been fore seen or prevented by human means. It 'had been determined in cases of embankment on the ,sea coaSt, where breaches had been made by storm, the county was liable. Lord EI:.LENBOROUGH=—"CaII you point out where a county' is liable to the visitation of God, and indi vidnals not ?" Mr. GLEADE--" Certainly not, my Lord." Mr. Justice Le BLANC--.." It tiialbe very severe - against the ladies, but certainly the case is very strong.against them." Butt: i-cfused. VFINIBEIt 9. CONSPIRACY-POACHING. THE KING V. TURNER AND SHEPHERD. Mr. JPRVIS moved_ for a rule to shew case why the; udgment against the defendants on this indict ment should not be arrested. The defendants were convided of a conspiracy on the third count of the indidment,, that •the y had conspired to ensnare . hares in a preserve of hares. This description,. in. hts (Mr. Yelvis:s) opinion was not sufficient, the count did not set forth the place where the offeace was committtd with sufficient precision. Lord ELLENBOROUGLI—" State tlae description in the indictment." Mr. JERVIS'—" For conspiring together, and lay ing snares to ensnare h.dres in a hare, preserve, on the night of the 24th of November." Lord - ELLE:raottou.on—" That is a sufficient de scription." • „ Mr. JERVIS—" Then, my. Lord, if it is, it ought not to be I?rdught in, the way of: indictment, but as an a-tion for a joint trespass at common law; for.in stance, .suppose - two persons going past a preserve belonging to agentleman, and agree to go shoot.in it, it would, be an agrxernent, never could lie rn4cle out aS . .a,'Ons.pirocy.".. Lord Et.t.,aNtoadoon-7—" It does not apprar to -the Court. that it Was,_a.conViracy to enter in the night you may therefore take tho Rule granted. Mr. JELIVIS—" defendants are in Court, and r ~ :~. _. ~,; . . I hope your LealLips IA ill allow them to rema;tl at lariT on their-bail." Lora ELLENEOHOUGH—" The Court has no di,- cretion ;. they at by the- pr3mice of the C-urt. I f the Lros , cutor does not cont-ent to their h::ing at large, they, must be committt d." . t Mr. DANCEY—" 1 ha , e no inctrunion, but shall take upoq mystlf to consent to t Len - going at large." Lord ELLENBOROUGII—" Be it so, then." THE KING V. DE YONGE. SELLING ()F GL'INEAS. Mr. MARRIOTT moved for a rule to .shevv cause why the verdict on this indittment sno , dd not be set aside, under the following circumstances :—The Defendant was indi6ted under the statutes of Edward the Third, and ELlwards the Sixth, which indicted a penalty on anyperson who exchanged gold for silver.at a higher exchange than that fixed by the the law of the realm. The tact of the prisoner having Sold 50 guineas for 2 2 . i6J, per piece, and received for them bank-outes to the amount of 5'61. and a bank dollar,' was nut denied ; but when the s.tatuti s- of Edward the Third and Sixtli were enacted, bank notes were not knOwn, -and could not have been in their contemplation. . Lord ELLENBOROUGH—" The Court thinks it is a case of much impoitirace, and tiler; foie you may ,take your-Ruie."—Rule gratiltd. Mr. ATTORNEY-GENERAL-6' I perceive the de 'feud:lnt is in Court, my Lord ; .but 1 conseot to his ;going at laage on his original basil. it has been just stated to me, tort such ano:her c se occurred arStal ford last As,izes, before LORI Chief Justice Mans field, and he directed. that it should ty2 pit; in a case . to be argued before• the Twelve Judg"ea—une caw will decide both." • .:Ir. MARRIOTT--" PahapS ,your Lordships will allow this to be also put into a case.; and that they may both be argued at the same time before- the Twelve Judges." Lord ELL2NBOROUGH—" So be it." SARAH BATP,M kr , : V. JOHN Er)LTLEY. Yr. Serjeatit COCKELL moved for a rule to shew cause Why the nonsnit in this cause should not be set aside, and a new trial granted. It was s anaalton broUght by:the plaintiff; - a lad3i, of fortune, against the defendant, - for.disturbing her in the . posesston of - her pew in church. It was trie=d at the last As sizes of York, before Mr. Justice Chambre. It ap peared that the ancestors of the plaintiff purchased, an extensive estate called Slate Hall, in Yoi Wine ;" in its neighbourhood Was a church with a single pew in it, winch belonged to the • proptietors . of Slate ; this church mouldertd away until it became incapable of- being repaired.. • The pa rents of the plaintiff', assisted by other neighboors, built another church and parsonage-house on the d of the 'plaintiff, whose parents. contributed 20001. towards their erection ; a pew was allotted to the possessors of Slate Hail, and another for the accommodation of the . Parson's family ; they had enjoyed it 43 years, when the defendant insisted they had no tight to the possession, and forced himself and h number of common persons into the pew ;• td prevent this in 'future, the action was brought. • The curate of the parish proved that the plaintiff had a.pew in a church in another parish. The Learned Judge - was decidedly .of opinion the plaintiff could nut hold two pews. in different pa rishes, and ordered the plaintiff to. be non-suited.— The Learned. Council did not know any case in point ; the one that came nearest to. it was that of Davis and Watts, in,the year 'lBOO, in the Court of Cum tit on Pleas. I.:vrd,ELL,ENBOROUGU--.-" Did you put it. to the Learned Judge vu the right of 14culty, Brother Cockell ?" Mr. Serjeant CocKELL-- . '!'l did not, my Lord; the Learned Judge seemed so decided in 'his opi nion. 7 Lord ELLENBOROUGH--" I think, brother Cock ell, after this omission in not enforcing that argu ment, we cannot disturb the nou.suit, but the plain tiff.is at liberty to btitri; a second action_; for in stance, 1 hold tk+O pews in different parishes, and I think it most necessary where the parishes and churches ate small, for it often happens th e r e 4 s ser-, vice only once on the €ablacnb in each; in the morning at one, and in the evening at the other." COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Nov. S. WINSTANLEY V. PHEASANT. This was an action for the value of certain goods, "alleged'to be the property of plaintiff, which were improperly detained by defendant. The plaintiff; it appeared was a broker, and had supplied Sir William Manners, while in the King's Bench, with certain articles of furniture, which, on the enlargement of Sir'William, had been ,placed in the custody of the present detendant .as a security for the s.,m.of. 51: due by Winstanley to him. Mr. Pneasant, on his, quitting the King's Bench, had left the furniture in the care of a person of the name of Bruce ; who being called on the part of the plain tiff, deposed, that in August, 1807, he knew Mr. Pheasant in the King's Bench ; when he left it he left the goods under the care of the witnesi ; Mr. Winstantey _might, have got them by paying ten pounds to Mr. Pheasant ; that-was the sum for which they were security ; Mr. P. had sent for Win stanley, and he vitas perfeffly aware of the circum stance. When Mr. Pheasant weot in the country, he left the goods in charge of the witness, with di- Jealous to deliver them up , to Winsianley, on his paying the 101. ; but Wiustanley never made an: offer of any money. He said he would call on Mr. Pheasant, aid it he did not pay the I 01. in a day or two, he would forego all right to the properly. fit . never did call ;. nor had the witness ever heard of , him since, until he. was served with a notice of the a6tion. - The goods, he thought, -were worth 71. or 61. He particularised the articles of furniture which had been in his.possession, a list which plaintiff's attorney presented him. - • As-the witness, though called on the part of the plaintiff, had sworn to facts, which if believed, made chreetly against him, Mr. Pitcher, the plaintiff's at tyrney, was produceli for the purpose. ot contradid ing• his statement, Mr. SejeantßEST objected to the.Counsel.on the part of the plaintiff c ev;dt , nce fur the pur pose of contradi6ting.his own witness. Lord Chief Justice M ANSFI eLv overruled the ob jcJion. Ii fiequently happened - that witnesses, when they came into Court, spoke very differently m what t bey S had "given reason to suppose they would, and completely deceived the Counsel for the party in whose htlialts they were called ; and he did oot think it improper where such was the case, t':at es idence of a diGrent description should be called. " You know, bother Best, you did the same thing in the famous. horse cause." Mr. Pitcher was then -examined.—The substance of his depo,ition was, that he had been told by Mr. Pheasant that his lien on the goods was but 51. ; and that when Bruce, the I , st witness, was applied to, to deliver up the property, on payment of that sum, he had denied any kooWledge of an agreement to give theth to Mr. Winstanley ; and ref.sed to de liver them to any person_ but Mr. Pheasant, He never before heat d that_the defendant had a claim for more than 51. He :had br6ught an action for - the goods against Sir Williatn Manners : butf as he .found that the possession of them had gone from bim, the busineSs had been , compromised, on Sir William'. paying 201. for the use of the furniture. He had never before heard of the agree-uent Men.: tjoned, by the laSt witness;.that,rif ten poimds were not paid at a certain time the goods should become the property of the defendant. A role ot Court that had be - en drawn up by the defendant's attorney, in:a former a'etion Which had been brought, against hint, reative to these articles, of furniture, but had not been proceechd in, in which be .notified his -intention of defending the action on the ground of having r,tained pos session. of the goods as a security for five ounds clue to him, was here put in, and admittedin eri.L dente. A person of the name of Huntingdon deposed, that he thought the goods were worth the price an nexed to tht!ln in. the list, about 151. Mr. Serjeant Besr, for. the defendant, addressed the duty with great eloquence. He deprecated the practice Of ;morales coning fob mard to give evi dence in cases where they were themselves em ployed, and in . which, of course, they must feel a consideiaple bias. A great law authority was of the same opinion ; - and he trusted, as he now had it in his power, being a Peer of the Realm, that he ould bring a Bill into Parliament for the purpose of preventing such proceedings,---=He contended, that tie Jury had no tight to garble a witness's :fence; they should .either receive or reject it alto.; gether. It this principle were flillOWed 'in the pre- sent case, there must be a verdict for his client; tor it they believed all Bruce's evidence, it went clearly to prove, that by the plaintiff's 'failing' to pay a sti pulated sum on a cei lain day to• the defendant, his -- 1 - 4-;lit in the disputed property had cased before the action.was brought. It, on the other !bud,' they dis believed it, then Mr. Pitcher's evidence went far • nothing; fur, in an action of this deScription, it was necessary that the disputed articles should be speci fied, ‘4 hick Bruce . had done, but Mr. Pitcher was totally incompetent to do; and, therefore, if they rejected .Bruce's evidence, that necessary fad not being proVed, a Verdict'rfur his client • must• `Lord Chief Justice MANSFIELD summed up the evidence with great accuracy.—He was of 'opinion that .the Jury had a right to give credit either to the whole or part of any evidence which came be fore.theni, as to them would seem propet. A wit ness Might, in some instances, speak incorrectly; and, in others, his deposition might be perfectly consistent wi.h truth. Verdiet for floe plaintiff, datnages 101. sabieEl to the ded'iaion of the 51. due originally by.plaintiff to defendant. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE: I 2 z dr I " 1 2 2 SOCIETY FOR . 711411 lINCOURAGENIP.NT OF ARTS, MANUFAG• Till:ES, AND Co:NI:NM:tea. The vacation being ended, the Members 0. 4 ( coinvose this excelkot institution 1 1 ,iv e leointedib ct ,. labour's, and though we h ave b:.eit, inclith-t1 to tiro: at each annual distribulio n o f rewor d s ( su ch 10 4 Veen she vari.-Yty of objects Which they have bce o means of brioging' into notice) that r ettiaint , tur heir Mature considei-at ion ;'yet if is really aSton i l: n ,l ing that so many re t eteuces shou ld Lave b eet s Co thew, the more especial' at So early a perio d ° the session. Among the inventions, which _have :dread, be en ll •reteried to the Committee of Nlechanics, Cit:)simi; supposed to be constructed \ on snob a pito: C,iple, that it only re q u ires 'h i l t ' t h e nutntler of "I' d employed in the common .way; to w or k it : siw u i . this, on investig a ti o n, _be fottid to be corred, a waiter of greater nbtional importance, could let n ; have beau discovered.. 'A. model / of a 7'elegr 3 P l ' . .. (-Inadrant, and Statf 4 a model of . 4 Machino to certain the waribci of days in arty intertn,-alia- 4 "1 a model of a Garde n • seat ; a D oo r L oc k with nitions; a Machine to swc.ep Chin - trues; a li wd . s)fal'attyun a new cuustrtiction ; a n .ottcl . ot a•F o ra Escape; a model to explain a new hod of tim i % 7 ing Bricks, anti Hints on Imptovements Mui:c." Instininetits: " - Several cominunications•haye likewise •heen. ala dt ' on Ago icult ural iinprovemetits, and 01 hers the Polite Arts, thernerits of w very earl)" Ili the sossion, be investigated bv the respc;....live C`" lv i mittets appointed to sttperintet.d those' toraneile'`' o f the Society's Ouitiess. • • • A proposition was read by the Secretary at thel" t meeting of tie Society (Wednesday) kt. !rich ha,i previously given him by a worthy member, i° :hung up the usual time, stating, that the ant" "' subscription to thi s i nst i tut i on s h ou ld , a f ter the Lad)- day next e nsui ng , b e ra i se d to thirty guineas 35 0 life-subscriptnn, instead o ftwenty, an d t tiree instead of t ; the terms under which mealb'l6.3l - this time elected. The Gentleman wh o p ro p ose d t hi s c h ang e in 1116 . -Rules , and Orders of the Society powerfully a:"- 3 t) cl , verted on the nec ess i t y o f such an a l terat i o n, serving, that every 'article had raised in price dcrably in the course of a few years,' and that t . lO a ni of Society had kept together, since its foundation, 1764, without the stindlest addition to the ter o a _ - adintssion ; and that though they had to eag r t i t , tulate themselves on having effected great•l lol ,: or yet while.a call from the public, which deserved 0 1)a patronage, remained unrewarded, it couid.uol::‘, conceive, . that 'the exertions of the Society ` s ; crippled, he therefore urged, that the propwi t ,'`:,.; which is intended .only to a pply t o new i nen 3 ' to after the lildy-day quarrer, should be taken 11 ' 0 4 consideration at: - nest Gen e ral Meeting, %, which,we understand, will be-di scusse d on W5(111(' day next. o • T.he.benefits which th e publi c h ave d er iver tri the Society's pro cee di ngs cannot b e better alf';we than considering the great improvements w lob 11 0 4 been made in th e course of a few ye is in • every branch-of science ;and, though other 3 ;w` 4 , tions may duly claim a d ue .portion of credit in ing contributed to the same end, it cannot be ci ctli ol so„etifett uaLare the advantagesreiulting from po ct *experiments, this . institution, in this (eV' stands - pre=eminent. 19 commemoration oflrisiVlAJEsTY's having c°ni ; pleied the,s,oth y ear o f hi s reign,. on the 25 th - u tt ' rb m o Earl of Bristol (with his usual regard wine c0n",,4 of the, poor) gave a cow eac h to , four o f his 11 ;, - o r trosiy labourers in IckworthPak ; for which 1 ,. v . drew lots for th e i r c h o i ce out of . six that were tos hihited to them, and e xp resse d th e i r grate ful t 1 ) 3 %, for his Lordship's benevolence. General fiA u ? a y , his Lordship's venera bl e unc l e, was l ast wed' rood ing his annual vi s it to t h e poor o f El o rringer Ickworth, distributing blankets and other item — clothing at this season. tY . el 0 134. A. gentleman in Li nco l ns hi re h av i ng 1s r ite served, as he thou g ht; a strange h orse i n a fa',„'-„ t) , cr eil field, desired his s e r vant , w h o h a d l ate ly e"g's',3; with him, to put th e an i ma l i n the.pound. Hed,4).# obeyed ; and, on passing the pound a fe v e, after, 'was astonished to find it was his owo O r va l, nearly starved, havi ng b een , d ur i ng - t h a t inter without. a morsel of food. BIRTHS.' • On Saturday last,'at Bredwardine. i Herefordshir e f countess Hereford, of a Son. On Sunday night, at his house in Bernard-strea.— u - 5 ~ square. the wife o f R o b ert B ayley, Esq. of a Oaught,,color On the 6th inst. at hi s h ouse i n l ' ark.street, square, the Lady of Colonel Mayne, of a Son. - itIARRIAD On the ,30t1i ult . at Mid)— o f at midhurst, Sussex; Mr. - Watling.stieet, London, to. Miss Athber, of Midhu; sr. loft; • On Wednesday morning, at Hammersmith, fo r '„i • Fownes, of Coventry-street, to Miss SpringthorPt e above place. ' 011 Thursday last, at St. M ary ' s, N ew i ngto n, Su rre '► Mr. just:ph Fuller, Bookseller, of Citaring.cruss, r° ', a ce* eldest daughter of Mr. Joseph Carter, of Newingrol l ' n Kenningto. rg a Yesterday, at St'. Mary's, Islingt o n, M r . George of Ludgate-hill, to Miss I larrison, of Kensington. 1 - D/ED„,„ . . - of 3 On Weild'esday . the 31st ult. at I Nu" consumption, Mrs. I ukes, aged 27, wiie of 1. I VI ' ' 1 Esq. , . Tunbridge O re, On Thursday. last, in C Italic - ester-street, Portmao:' c l Charle Moore, Esq. Au.utur of Pub:ic Accounts. , „ell , The same day, Mrs. Sykys, of the Terrace, Caul'' e r r i . ,,tor s At ‘Veybridge-, M. Altiday, Steward to the Pr °l '''' , . ofßiver %Vey tor twenty >ears'. ' r a' ,; s te In iMa4'...stroet, •Dublin,. Pliiltp Adams, Esq. Ba r- • kaw. " Tac ics. ()n the 9th tilt. in Caithness, Mt. Marcus Gunn' ',,e if ° man of Iblemore, within one 'day of 'completing t'' - - ' year of d screr3 _ On the. ;6411 ult. at Edinburgh, after a long 2 n„ istoo illness, Mrs. Grace MiDonald, wily o! Mr. pines L' 2 j - Stabler.. . . - an Lately, at Inverharity, in the Parish of Gtellis l3 ‘ 10/ i County of Forfar, at the advanced age of 115, Cilliillan Wells' 6. bertson, .a poor woman. COAL MARKET, NovLimEit 9 • Ships at Market. Shi ps so ld . Price. .2S Newcastle . . .S 4. od. to 635. 96 84 Sunderland . . . q ) .4s, od. to HILLSBOROUGH RACES. - WEDNESDAY, OCT. 2.1. The Trifle Stakes. A Sweepstakes of togs each, ta—r. for Colts and Fillies to be got by Trifle in iSos, and Coaled in 1806. Lord Do negal gives the winner jogs. Mr: Watson's b. g. . . • . a t Marquis Donegal's b. g. Greyl),?ard . . 1 2 Mr. Want's b. m. • - • 3 3 • Air, Wakefield and Mr. Hughes p a id f or f e i t. —E vcn bet— ting,. between the heats—won easy. Sweepstakes of sgs; each, p. p. for, Hunters not.thorough bred. ' Mr. Verner's b. g. Grasshopper Marquis Donegal's b. g. Vicar wo to one on Grasshopper.—Vicar broke down. THURSDAY. _ Downsbire Stakes. Fifty Guineas given by •Lord Downsinre, added to a Sweep. stakes ot 2sgs. e:ich—i3gs. forfeit. Mr. Battersby's Yeoman Marquis Donegal's liatt , rsbina High udds on Yeoman—Won easy. Sweepstakes of sgs each, p. p. for real Hunters that never started fur a racing plate or stakcs. Mr. VerneOs h. g. Grasshopper Mr. Wattmii's.b. g. Spanker Marquis Donegal's b. g. Greybeard Spanker me favourite 7 a good race. • •• I I • ' 2 `2 • - 3 3 FRIDAY, , • Sweepstakei of sgs. each, p. p. the Stewards to add 3ogs. to the whiner. Marquis of Donegal's Clioakjade Mr. Battersby's Yeoman . s 1 . z do 2 r 0 I on Yeoman- -won easy. • -. Subscription purse collected by the Ladies for grey hacks, rode by Gentlemen, halt mile heats. Eight or nine started for this, which afforded much sport, and was won by the Marquis of Donegal. SA rURDAY. Mr. Mathew's g. g. rode by Mr. Verner, beat Mr. -Max well's h. g. rode by the owner, two-mile heats, tor /ifty guineas. Mr. Mathews the favourite.— Won by half a neck. Capt. Isaac's b. - g. Holywood Squ e e ze, beat M. Fords' b; g. Counsellor, rode by the owners, one wile, for 501. ' Last Wednesday evening, a man, upwards of 70 years. of age, was drowned,. while . watering'a horse at - a pool near Stourbridge. It is verY - teniarkable; that, the animal -did hot stir from the spot till the next ,morning ; which circuMstarice led to the dis• cove.ry of accident. ONDON P rinted by RICIJARD HARRIS, or . No. q, martiat.court, Bow—strtet t - AJUlTl:bilSheil by WILLIAM ARMIGLR SCRIPPS, South Molton.street, Gra - repot rtmere, the ‘Sliti.OPPlcs, No, I /2, sand, i , vbere , dtelt4rtisemeas l Orders for the Paper, 'Letters for th e edie or &i. (p o st-paid), must be addicts:M. ~' y ..Nt IT, 41 /Ls t he 144 ° NC, ~ epr ford °Se I VG r e , h ot ze in : 14 licar 4 4,4,44,, it , 114, hl, P r l4 74 ' ). 11/,, kidevoiefri, ' C r)" b4if 'Pur, eis aki to 6 ' e we. The'cc reg, 6 IL Ye 711,, • ,• 4 or 4 2hz e fer k ;, , !tl. 0 tht a ka p it !lnti n LKE- 1 1 1 , 1 . AT r A kb e • 10 4 - " , 1. 01' 4 r i l k th: n Il an . ° I ( . .;Ik - K 4 44 1) ) ' 43, ~~ at,~ a S t } T a ~~ A !lt, V E 14,4 101 1); b ein mi : l t!t . 4 1 4te o f t .144 L(iit, P• 'IN: -'rated P t : No s'lne4t SMirk e s 4 yol s. THP' Y RE N , P l i . pnted 7erci ot e rtv ,_ * tmlltst , Of " di I :goal dre.2ll° yl twpriate A . LE k o „ Si t 7" deta cl• Ro two ya t ~t: an a rs t() ra be b e r a t Y 4 obi ~ -. II ~. q 1 .