The Sun. — London, England, 1808-07-20 00:00:00

_- i 1. LAII siir.Rur:s , RT,'"l UESDAY, JULY 19. N . L CON. Loiio BenuNGDoN V. Silt ARTIIVR PAGET, K. . , - . i;ehl before the Srieritr .f.f ,t.., asscss dawaLe3 dU .to , iflr ;he D,:lem. t .a , ..t, as a cympensation fur tti.e thy DAMPII.:II opened the case on the part of the Mr. PARKE, on the same side, stated, that the Piaintifi c- I was a Nobleman of high rank n arid also of ctnisiderable fortune, tt ho four years ago, at the age of 3 t, tnariied the diooliter of a. Nobleman of equal' rant, the. Lail of Westmorland, the daughter being t hen -aged IS. Floe Oetendant ryas also of a Noble Tan - lily, being the second' g6n, of the Earl of Ux bridge: The: Defendant had been in the confidential employ:pent of his Sovereign, hating bi.sen'ernploy ed Ist t ,•, - 0 Embassies, one at Viehno, and one 3t stani . • The . l'idintiff and Defendant were at one r....'nrversitv, and, as the Leirned Counsel believ, cd, of one College, Christ Church. In the year 17;j they suet together in Russia, but their acoca lions being different, the Plaintiff having applied his mind to Lis p4rlian , etitaty duties, While the Defend _ ant was eilgagccl in - his diplomatic tunctions,.a . great intiLncy had not taken place between them. They did . , indeed, occasionally dine together during the inter:lds in v hich the Defendant was Hi this coun try. During the present year, however, while the Pia'intiff was employed in discharging his duties in Part inan-nt, which, being an arduous Session, afford ed the Vaintiff ;ew opportunities of having parties at his house, the Djendant.was seldom there to his les!ge. It w'ould, however, 'be shewn, that the.Detendant had called, at the Plaintiff's house in a clandestine manner, day atter day, since the -coin finovreinEb Of the present Session of Parliament, that be hail gone up stairs, often without inquiring for any •ncts- 0, - and that lie and Lady lloringdon had, • during such visits, often remained together in the back parloin tor one or two hours together. Racing so far ` l ' stated the case now under consideration, the Learn ' ed Coon,lit proceeded to show; that there was no inerpiality in the rank of the parties, and there no disparity in age, the Plaintiff being 31 and his wtte i t 3. The. Plaintiff, at the time of his mar nad every reason to suppose he possessed the affections his wife. If, however, any argument arts , tig.Atom the inequality of age should arise, it sy n n,d come with a .bad grace out of the mouth of the Deienumt, who o.as 38, while-the Plaintiff wqs only The Raintlti had no reason to suspett the .fidenty of his till he had infor...ation'ou the sub jea 110:n Others, Then, in consequence of the ft e .queni Lt,its of the Defendant, unknown to him, he question-q 1 his Lauy, as to the fact, whether any en minal intercourse had taken place between them ? she, give no sat istattory 'answer, and, nest day, left the PrAintirl: , house, and had since lined in a-state of 2-Jutziy with Sir A. Paget. This the Defendant hat.i confessed, by ailoWing Judgment to go against kiln by default .; the Jury were therefore relieved from the trouble of finding any thing as to the fact of the adultery. There teas hardly au instance in which, ib a case of the kind, the accuser was not . , through the medium of the newspapers, turssed into the accused. lii prustcutlon of this system, the Plaintif had, by the newspapers of the day, been _ loaded w:11.1 the most grievous obloquy. The Learn ' Connsel liad no suspicion such statements would 'snake any impression on the Minds of the Jury, but . be alluded to them lest his silence might seem to in fer an acquescence in. their justice, which he com- . - pletely denied, and which he defied the Defendant • tO prove in any instance which, could :bear on in his condu6t in any out instance as a man or as ,a h is band. He should call betore the Jury a number of Witnesses of the highest consideration, and also a medical man who had attended Lady B. all of - whom would prove that a more attentive and affectionate husband, and a happier dud more' domes'tie couple, and one, at the same time, more stria in their reli gioas duties, never existed than Lord and Lady fior ingdon, down to the Bute of the unfortunate elope ment: The happy state in which they lived; and also the affection which subsisted between Lord and Lady B: th*Learned Counsel shobld be able to chew, not only from the evidence of some of the most re.:. speCtable persons in the country ; but also from the letters of Lady 13oringdob to her husband during his absence. In proof of this fa& the Learned Counsel 'real two loaers. The first letter was dated the 14th of April, 1806, and had the following espres- tiloc;s :--- " 1 am very sorry, my clearest love, to hear that you are w y t so anxious about your letter, that I was almost aliain enquire. .; nave myself been unwell, and in:Mc:La to tic sou.e ,iticiarctanr, (you must not scold me). Tins wade me so that I could not go to church last Sun day, as I iniencled. Do not believe that this was from neglect or our orders, or negligence of any son, it wa: from the violence of my coil.' This lasts b ewe d the care that the Noble 1 3 1.,iimiti had to fix in ins Lady those habits,oi mo rality and religion in which she - liad• been brought up, In the same., letter there was the fulloWing sentence :7—`` It - appears to me' six weeks, instead o; six days, since - you have left me." There was an Other 'leiter, dated the Ist yf Apn,i, 1807, which .had the follow log - exprersions w,+.; quite ao cinexpectc4l . pleaSure'for rxte to hear from yeti. I am quite weii, and so is my dear..littic Henry. I . nt)pe, ci:ar yuu will like my z;oing to, the y lay, as nothing Li.culu give use pleasure that was out agree able to - ) ou." Learned CiAansel ,conceived the circumstances click; 'which' the Defendant iisited at rue house of the Plaintiff, - as a great aggravation `ot his offence. , -Tlrie'visits so made by bins were - au w i t h out t h e N.k ii7'clge Of - the husband, add 't lie Defendant, 4o have ihade them' at the times he did, must have. been lti:king-about, watching the departure ofAlie Plaiu tiif to attend:his du:y in Parliament. He hen, the me:llmA the Plaintiifilt his house, knocked at the ‘!o.i;r, and, withdot making any enquiry, went staiis, ti: lri re ' - he and Lady B. sat together in the blibk drawing-room.—The 'Delendatii was also in the use of mi4oing*Ladyti,:in the morning§ at Ken sititon Garden, where stile and heir child had gone -AO take the' arc. while the n6rse attended the child one - the Defendant . and Ladyß. went the other,' and alter • strolling about for one Or two returned", -- when they separated, Lady Bor- Bank Stock, 2431, LONDOri!: Printed by RICHARDEIIitRIS , Ot No. gi Marlett-court; 13o w _ s irect ; and Publishei by WILv LAm m g ARte Scit ;,•S,ut ( ) Molt.)n.str:t,qroveror - sq , iarl At the ' BON-OFFIciE No. Strand.; where iitivai,lisements, Orders ior the Paler, I eller; the (pust-paid) mast be ai4ki,cessed. Navy i per Cent 99 I : I-, i' • loan, lionas, ss (is. 4- .v , Irish 5 per Cent. I Excheq. Blii6, 7. i.i• i '. 4 pc; Lem.. lis 4i i • . Oinniunt, 3 3 . pet Cent. ken'o9 ai . , I niperial .; per Cent. • 3 - per Cent. Con. 66 ii a' . Ditto Ann. ' q 22d • . 1. Bunk L. Ann. 19 i- itn it • • 1 -Cuus. tbr Last. 70 .i......./b EK AT LONOON liL IDGC TO -M ° Morning,- 9 inin. , after 12. Aftanzon, ,39 a'ter 11: 41041 returning in the coach in which she came, and the Dc•tendant mounting • his horse. In esti inlvinr• the damages the Jury would take into their . conF.id'eration the high rank, situation, honour, .and .fortune 01 the patties. Tbe Lea filed Counsel (Id not ask , that the Jury should punish Sir Arthur for his•ebnduct, that was noLwithin their power by the lay,. of England.-,--But still he called on them, as men of honour, to grata io Lord Loringdon ample - reparation for the injury he had sustained. The Defendant had had honours ceilterred on him by his The Learned'Counsel did not say they ere not 2,•stly'conferred.. He had, however, twice been the . representative of his SoVereign---a Sove reign the most.vi i rtuous that could Well be imagined, and, - he ,snbmitted to the - Jury, that at the age of • as, the Detetulant, as the representative of a vir - ; thous Sovereign, should havi set a very different example. He : hoped the Jury would make him, and others in a siMilar situition, follow a different line of cotidud ; and that their verdict to-day would not be in.vain,- but such as justice, reason, religion, antl .virtue demanded. " Lord Amherst was the first witness examined. He deposed that he had been acquainted with the Plaintiff for the last nineteen years. He had lived on habits of intimacy with him, and - continued to do so since his. marriage. The Plaintiff married Lady Augusta Fane, *the second daughter of Earl Westmorland, in June or July 1804, and by her he had one child. The witness had frequently been ht the -house of the Plaintiff when he and his wife were without any other company than. the witness' and a:few private friends. He had also seen them often' in private, and his observations on the Nidiele was, that the Plaintiff and his Lady lived on the most terms,eetionate and thatethe Plaintiff uniformly • treated Lady B. with the utmost kindness. He did . not recoiled a single instance to the contrary:—On his , cross-examination by Mr. GAattow for the De fendant, the witness said, the, last time he saw Lord Boringdou and his pady together was the early - part of April- last. • The Honourable George Villiers said, be had married the Plaintiff's sister, and lived with*Lord and Lady Boringdon, both in town and country,, on the most intimate terms. They visited at their respe6tive houses, and, on all occasions, the.conduat of, the Plaintiff and his Lady to each other was kind, affeCtionate, and familiar. They went regularly to church on Sunday, and partook of the sacrament to gether once or twice a year. He proved the letters produced to be Lady B.'s hand-writing. Mr. Vaughan, Surgeo'n, proved that_ he had at tended Lady B. in sickness, and that Lord B. was a kind, careful, ,and atiettionate .husband, both in sickness and in health. He never saw more polite and affeelionate attention in any person:: Sir W. Elford, who lived within six miles of Lord B.'s country seat, in Devonshire, gave a similar tes mony. He had lived in the:Plaintiff's house, and never saw an instance in which be and ins Lady did not behave towards each other with the utmost at tention and aflection. . On this part of 'the case Mr. PARKE. proposed to give in evidence twodsetters, to which he had referred in the course.ot his speech, written by Lady Boring don to her hUsband during temporary absences. This species of 'evidence was objected to by Mr. Gmtkow, and the Under Sheriff sustained the ob jeelion, on the ground that as the Lady was not here a Defendant, and her parole testimony could not be received for her Lord en this case, ueither could any §tatement of her's in writing be deemendiresdble. Elizabeth Croft had been nurse to the Piaintif f 's child two years. The family came to town in Janu .atv, 1808. 'Lord B. was in the habit of going every evening to the House of Lords. The Defendant often cattle to the house always in the absence of the Plain tiff. The witness used to go with her lady and the child to Kensington Gardens. They went in by s ßqswater Gate. The Defendant was always there when.her ladyship Went. She and the Defendant walked one way, and the witness and child, the other way. .They walked about Sometimes an hour and a half, sometimes for three quarters of an hour. Thi s ,happened- very' frequently, particMarly within the eight days previous to the time of her ladyship's quitting the house, which she , did on the 18th.of May. The Plaintiff was always very attentive to his Lady and child. Cross-examined by Mr. GAR- How.—The witness said,. that Lady B. and the De fendant never quie:ed Kensington Gardens during their meetings there, but that they returned, as they had come, different ways. „ Sarah Potter said, she had been,. Lady Boring don's maid for four years, Sir A. P. often called, but she never saw him in, a room - witls. her .mistress. She has, however, seen him going - out, but never saw him come in. Cross-examined by Mr. GAR-- now—There were two beds in the room in which the Plaintiff and his Lady slept; they were 'bOth used, but were close together. _William Rodman, the porter, said, that the De fendant often came to the Plaintiff's house from the time of the family's 'coming to town till that of her Ladyship's leaving her home. The Defendant at first came when Lord B. wits at home, but; latterly, only when was out. He seldom asked for any person, but immediately when the door was opened went up stairs, and remained with Lady B. in the back drawing room, sometimes for 'an hour or.an hour and a half. From- the loth May,-eight days previous . to Lady B.'s leaving her husband's house, the Defendant's visits were continued almost etery day-. . 'Arthur Pastan, - a 'footman, gave similar evidence. Mr. GARRoW., for the Defendanterigreed with hiS Learned Friend that the Jury were nor, in a case of this kind, called on to punish. They were not to correct the manners of the age, or to suppose that it was their province to make things as well as they, possibly could be: Their functions were greatly circumscribed in this respect. All the length they could go was, to make pecuniary compensation to - Lord Boringden, as far as- his case could admit of compensation. As to paragraphs stated by the Learned Counsel to have appeared in 'the newspapers, there was not a domestic occurrence of however delicate -and distressing a kind, which did not find its way thither, with numberless addi tions destitute even of a particle of truth. He stood there, however, to protect Sir A. Paget .? not to Ebel Lord Bpriogdon: He proceek' , d to contrast the present cast: with one lately before the same Court, and spewed that the verdi& in tbe one, even sup posing it to be any rule for the decision of the Jury in the present trial, had no analogy what ever to the case under consideration. An at tempt had been made to represent the Defendant as an Ambassador, for no purpose which he could figure, but to introduce a panegyric, in w hich he most cordially agreed with, on our most worthy and excellent King. The Defendant, however, at the period in question, was no Ambassador but the Ambassador of alltnighry•Love. He was a' brave soldier, and as such had purehaged honours ; but his fortune was yet to be acquired, for of that he had none. There was in this case DV detach of friend , ship or of hospitality, which the Defendint had vio lated. The witnesses bad not been able -even to bring him to the table of the Noble Plaintiff; they not even been seen together. Was this, then, a casein which it could be:alleged the Defendant had broken in on the domestic comforts of the Plaintiff ? He submitted it was not. The Jury were rather called on to inquire if, instead of being an ag gravated case, thiS was not 'a. case of compassion— ono attributable tb the state of manners among the higher circles, rather than arising from any peculiar blame on the part of she present Defendant. Fashion would here be found to be the bitter enemy of both parties. Fashion teaches that at the age of Ia or i 6, a young Lady, who, if she be known to pos . - sess a fortune, has only hitherto experienced the flattery of her servants, accotding to whose account she is all perfection, should ,be brought out or intrydaced, as it is called. It then follows, as a matter of coarse, that a suitable match shoUld be Imiked out for her,: mid if a person of corresponding rank and fortune be fe *ad, his wife she, with all necessary ex pedition, becomes. Fashion leads the husband one way and the wife another. Fashion prescribes, even, that though the parties lie in the same room, they should sleep in separate beds. Fashion, or be 'it the more imperious duty of attending in the House of •Lord, draws the 'husband ,from home, and an agreeable saunterer steps in. The visit is repeated again and again. But, if either the one party or the other could invert the glass, and seehow the prosped would end, the first visit of the kind would, in most instances, be the last. Such was the situation of Lady 13. She imprudently admitted the visits of Sir Arthur Paget,'and he, as imprudently, made them. These visits came to the knowledge of Lord .Boringdon, and his Lady was questioned. No criminality bad then taken place—no prying waiting_ woman had here been adduced to prove her hair being disordered—that she had been found locked up in the room with a paramour—bht she is questioned by her husband as to the vi sits ,she had received. How the question had been administered to her Vas not. -known ; but her inborn sense of honour taught her, that,. after such a suspicion, she could no . longer remain in her husband's house. She probably had a partiality which she condemned ; that she had not now that undivided affedion she ought to Lave felt for her husband,whose abode she must therefore quit. What, in mach a situation, ought to have been the condu& of the Defendant ? That • which it had been—that, he would venture to say, which would have been the' conduct of any of the gentlemen of the Jury. in similar circumstances. Atter telling him that Lord B. snspeeted that there was something impro per-in their visits ; that she was rtained past redemp tion ; that she could not look her husband In the race; that the world viewed their conduet with a eittletenf eye from what they themseltes had re crarded it•• that she had left her husband and could .L r nut return ; —what could his condud be, assufning,. as the Learned Counsel felt hio,sell warranted in doing, that there had hitherto been no crimina lity other than him elf. becoming her protedor ? Had his conduct been otherwise, he would• not have merited the cliaacter be 1141 already given him, but would have deserved greater damages to have been inflicted on' hint than any which the the Jury, in the present circumstances, could possibly award. — This, the Learned Counsel condemned, was nut the case of a common seducer. There was here no vio lation of hospitality, but a sudden ruin, as it were, had come upon the parties. He was confident in the whole circumstances of the case the :Jury would be satisfied it was not an aggravated case, but an un fortunate one.' Mr. BuncuneL, the Under-Sheriff, summed up the case in a very distind and ',impartial manner ; and, after deliberating for a short time, the Jury found verdict—Damages 10,0001. OLD BAlL EY . —Yesterday John Smith and Charles illeyrick were capitally indicted for burglariously en tering'the house of T. Davis, at Bagnigge Wells, on: the 20th June last, and stealing theretr9m six bottles of wine, a gun and blunderbuss, and several other articles. The burglary was clearly brought home to the prisoners, and the Jury brought them in Death. . Same day the Sessions ended, when sentence of death .was passed on Joseph West, for a burglary in the dwelling-house of John Hanson.---4ohn Smith and Charles Meyrick, for a burglary in the dwelling house of john Davis.—Wm. kazakerly, for stealing goods in the dwelling-house • of Thomas Eddes.— Win. Bumstead, for stealing monies in the dwelling house of Timothy Peter Artis.—Robert Whitting ham ancl Levy Lyon, for stealing.goods in the dwell ing -house of George Hatton.—Edward, alias George Rouse, for stealing goods in the dwelling-house of Ric'hard Millman.—William Bowen, for stealing go: Ids in the dwelling-house of Robert Shuffle wortn.—Thomas Monday, for stealing a 501. Bank note,. of Benjamin Parkhurst, in the dwelling-hou,4 of Thomas Scott. Edward Churchill, alias Roach, Mary Jennings, Charles James, Win. Taylor, Donald Rob . iison, Cripps, Catherine Perry, Charlotte Wood, hose Kite, Ann Finland, James Henley, and Thomas Dijen port, to be tranportedyor seven years. Elizabeth Waters to,be confined two fears in the Houz , e ofCorreetion, Cold-Bath-Fields ; three to be imprisoned therein for 12 calendar' months each ; nineteen fot 6 calendar months, four of whom to be privately Whipped; two to be imprisoned' in New gate for one year, two for lesser periods, one to be publicly and two privately whipped and discharged, two judgments respited, three tined •is. each and discharged, and twehty were discharged by procla-, mation.;—Sessions adjyurned to the 1411 i September. St 7 ll/II!Et ASSIZES. NORTHFIZN CINCUIT, Mr. 11.1StiCe.CgALIBRE—Mr. Baron W OC.'n . City of York", and County 0/ the ;,,trie City--Saturday, Jul • 30, at the,(: tit,: said City. Yorkshire— The same day, at the Castle of York. Durhatn—,Tuesday - , August 9, at the Castle of Dutham— Town. of Neweast le-upon-Tyoe, and County of the saali Town—Saturday, August ti, at the Guildhall of the s.; Town. Northumberland -The same day, Motile Castle of Newcastle uistott.:l) Cul►lbetlai4=FridaY, August 19, at the City of Carlisle. Westmorland—Thursday, August ZS, at Arpleby. Lancashire—Ajonday, Atigust 2.1), at the Castle ut Lancaster, • OXFORD CIRCUIT. • Mr. justice t. Wit EN —Air. lUSLICe . E BILANc. Berkshire—Thursday, itily 28, at hhiugdou. l)xturttshire-=-Saturdav, 30, at Oxtvra. Gloucestershire —Weducstt.6 . , Au4ust 3. at Clouccster• City of Gloucester -1 he Nallle day, at the City of Glow' center. • Nlontuouthshire-!Sattirday, MA:2st 6 at Monritouth. , fierehirdshire--Tuesctay, A - ugust 9, at 11.eiseurd. Shropshire-Saturday, August 23, at Shrt:wsoury„ Stattiffiishire—Wectuesday, August 27, at .Stailiml. I,Vort:estershire—Saturday, 422,.i t zD, at 'Nutt:ester. City of Worcester- , -thesalue. day, -at the Cu) 4.2l‘Vuttester. MIDLAND t.:IIt.CUIT, Mr. fustic..l,GßosE: , --Al . r. liarou Tpomsoti. Northaprripto . nshire-Juesuay, Lily 26, at N tharripton. tlandsti ire - riday, Jul- 29, at ( !slid r!.1... lincolnsiiire -Saturday, I ul3 . 3b,"at" C4StIC of Lincoln. City of Ltricalp-'-sailie ddy, at LUC City of Lincoln. Nottinghaitts.hire-Thint,nay, ~cltigust 4, at Nottiniliain. Town of Not tingluill," 0:1), : at the tolVil of Nuttil i ghatit , I)erbyshire.---Satu: day, Augibt 6, at Derby. I.eicestershire 7 rsday, A ug." , at- iht:Cast le of Leic'ester• 13orough of Leicester - same day, at tita tioroui,ht.,l Leice.tcr . . -City or Coventry- Saturilay, August 13, at the city of Lo. vestry. ' Warwickshire , - . samz day; at Warviiick. • , NORTH WALLS StiAnlek. cißcurr; isos. Hucu LEYCESTER, Esq. -"Sir THOMA S LV1 , 41.K. August 23, at 1)01,;e11. Carnarvonshirc -Month), icugiist 24), at Carnarvuu. Anglesey-Saturday; Sep:. 3, at iteatilliettiS. CHES rER ci RCULT. ROBERT DALLAS, Lsq.---,1%;,:.1 IlexTotl, Esq. 1149ntgumeoshirc—Ilitirsday, August 25, at Pool. Dclib4;l4llqe--Wednesd,q, August 3t, at Kt4t4,111. • . lintslure—Tuesday, September b, at Mold.. "Chcshire—Mutida);'September 12, - 4 the Castle of Chester* ISLE Ok ELX, ASSIZES. LDWARD CHRISTIAN, Esq. Ely—WeAnesday, jut) , 2.1. • PARTNERJIIII'S DISJULPED. Faircloth and G. Payne, of lolol's-row, Old-strett, St' Luke's, glass-manufacturers. A. Henley and Co. of Aunts Hill Colliery, Butterwort"' Rochdale. G. Thatcher and 1. Rayment, of. Broadway, Westminster, brush-inakers. G. A. Musket and F. Beavan, of Snow's-Melds, Berrnond i. ' sey, chemists. K. E. Morgan and M. E. lones, of Bedford-street, toveat. Garden, Utess-niakers. 1. P. Graddonaud 1. Cowell, of York-street, Covent•G ar# den, mercers. COUNT B E AOLA S .--Al fonso, Count De Beattyr lais, whose death we have mentioned, wag the youngest of the three sons of Philip Egalite, - Dtik ° of Orleans.—He was scarcely 2g years of age. 'ro c Duke De Montpensier, Anthony Philip, seCond the sons of Egalite, died i only about a year ago, 1 14 r this metropolis. He was aPi ince -of some talents' in particular for painting ; in which art he was suc h a proficient, that it was believed he might have :lc d. quired both reputation and subsistence by his VT' formances in that line, if he bad been driven to e'd necessity of praaising it for support. The Dolc e De Montpensier, and his brother, the Coon iDe jolais, were only 01 the age of fourteen and twen t :, when the French Revolution broke 0uk.irx.,17 . 2 . 3. the execution of their to her in 1793, v, ere up by ordertf the National. Abs.mt't,ly, in the 1 4. y rt a of Notre Dame de la Garde, near'lllat'seities. 'attempt to effeJ escatie frOm that .lottres s. , Duke De Montpensier fell and frai:tured his l~ Their e,cier brother, the Duke De Chartres, Duke of Orleans, haling quitted' Frailce, previbcs • his fathers imprison:lien' and death, wandered i:tr'► a I:lrge part of ).4.:urope. The pre6ept Doke 4 li Or r leans, who is cit tlnrty-five years old,' we t) with his brother, the Count De BeanjolLis t o .I\/:0!t 11 ; only a few weeks ago. His hearth- is said td a precariottsstate: With him would espire ti p branch of the illustrious House of Bourbon. descends from Louis XIII. and Anne by Philip, younger brOther of Louis XIV. Who the .f?t:het 4.4 , the famous Regent Duke, so' o` e known by his capacity and his debaucheries. • RIR-TIM. Lately, , in Carmarthenshire; the Lady of bun Lord, O s of Linculn's• inn, at mo Daughters. . tt r Ott the 16th inst. at Twickenham, Lady Elizabeth £ 0 of a Son._ ~- ' , - . • Lately, the Lady of Georg Henry Rose,'Esq. of a Scrl. MARRIED. iel On tbes4th ult. at St. George's, 1-tanover-square, 1,0 1 1,0 Robertson, Esq. of Old Botal-street, to Miss Amelia 110 Clarke, clau,gliter of the Rev. Dr. Clarke. t,t r Lateiy, Mr. W. N. Cole, of Larithetii,.to Miss Burl' of Chaling-cross. . _., UP SILICAS vssTs ttnAv, I Si India Stock, tfisl 155 ;?* rot' f • DIED. Yesterday morning, at her house in Portman..square,,f 75, atter tilong illness, the Right Hun. Dcevya;kri - Lary dieton, in the Couoty of Wary%l e ck. Tilt; saute morning, at Maryland Point, after a few o.l d ~ occasioned by a tall from gig, Thomas Court, • ut St. klelcit's• place, aged 31. On the 4111 mat, at lead-quarters, l;clfast, in the 41 4; yet of his age, Derby laincsO'Gra.iy, E sq . c apta i,, 1 ' County Limerick. Royal Regiment of Militia. On 'Wednesday last, at her apartments iu Gre a t Port 10?" street, aged 74, Mrs. l'aro, formerly of St. laines's On the 15111 inst. at Bristol liot %Veils, whither sne for the recovery ut her llealtn, Mrs. Parris, widow, ofi 1.4 tingharn• place. ' • 'of On the ibtit inst. at Sunbury, Sir John Legard, ,'l3ar t ' ,GailtOn, Vorksiiiie, aged jo. (hi . Sunday last, Mrs. B wile of Edward Hitt slev, Esq. ut tiotkwold, Norroik. On Monday morning, at lour O'clock, at his house per itzroy-street, Maftlia, Jilt: imam daughter of s"' W F M•Morris,. Esq. aged two years ten. months arid reit he sante day, Mrs. B. Levy, of Alount-streat, chapel. Her death %vas occasioned by incasitiously catilo; errant \ when overheated, winch briught on an intranitnillp and ,su.idenly tertninated h er existence,.