The Sun. — London, England, 1809-02-17 00:00:00

~,. pnritlity nf. direEtly contraiii4iitg-,the assertiotitif .ir, Claro. th:it xvas.injarioU,s to hial, becould • 11,141 i, ility in saying it was false; if true; the ton..r.try. In,tead, hou-tver s cif this, the (e::tletnan had a , ked, him, and a hundred others, uce're present, to draw the inference, w he tuns( t)e flinch more able to draw . 114r„,NVItiTattvito enlarged upon hni former argu- mem: . Mr. BA env./ 'hought that it Was more a gnestion Of conclu , ,ion 111311 f 3 't, and the Hon. Gentleman could eaitod net only to give his own opi bkirhis ot . be .ovitliotti cp others. Mr. CwiKirit said'he had done bis ',boy in :putting the yieru'inti, it was for the Hun., Gentleman to answer it he thought fit,• and the Committee to require wit.it :ypeated to them necessary. Mr. WAttoi..l.:--:‘ . ‘l Was anxious to get the let ters, but mule no dircd promise that I am, aware..'' of." tl. Sir V. oinie...--,Dicl you direOly or indire4lly • !I • 1 promise Mrs. Clarke to comply _with her . desires, : (o cough)—;requo,t ?--A. I cannot say whether takint:i. the letters might not be construed by her in- to In iedited promise. . I t;* Tile; CH A NCELLOR' Of OW . EXCHF.OUKR said, liC WOUld :lOW solicit the attention of the Coinmittee to 1 . ain liter of very great consequence. The fad to which .he 'alluded was of the "utmost importance, , . and thongh ••ii had not yet been made knownto•the, 1 - sorts g enet a lly, it was well known tomatiy•Hon. Centlemen .on 'both sides,' not only arnong his frieeds,. bet among those' whO acted with the H et. Centennan :who badn4lit forward this charge . . lite bad been acquainted with at for ten days;„ but for the reasons he would hereafter 'assign, had thought it right not to bring it' forward till after :the evidence i was clo , ed. He WaS SIMS when it' Was heard, it would be the genet, l opinion that it ought to be made knosien. It wiis the SviSlt of his Rot al•High 7 , l tkeSS ' the Commane r 'in Chief that "it St-lonia be 0,, communicated-to tlt Committee ; thd.. proper. time to do so b e in g left- to his •(Mr..Percevars) discre lion, so that It I):..rw• was due for the delay; that blame was his. ' The lad to Iw'ticli he alluded was, the suppression of material evidence in. one ) of the cases betore the COnuelitee (M tior Vtiyirs), • which as it now stood t.ii.is as • follows. (Here the Right.. 41 ''n• Gentleman •stated•the evidence of Mt s. Clarke, `l*- Denman, and Capt. Sandell, in this case, par- , ticularlyof the latter, whith relates' tu-Ille interview I Itu had with Major Tonye, who wanted his money returned' when he petsuaded trim. to ler the matter t Test for a s n ort ti me , fo see whether or nut his pro- IMoiiou rtes Gareeed). He could not explain the .. natter lie now wished to bring forward, better than •by relre.ine'We a l hit he'ppened. On Saturday :'ii- Eight Colohel , Hamilton Called upon him with a letter leen Air. Aden), say nig he had leasiness of ' importa nce ii, Contin , inicate.. The coeamunication was to this etred:, that on:their arrival from .6 pain ' (Col. Hainilion and Capt. S'aeilee are in the Waggen ` T rain), Celt. Sanden had made him a..qaainted with circumstances which , xeresrry material to tile inees- I . tigailou noW before the Busse. When eapt.',,San -1 . den was called to the;llar, lie was desired to ittlorni ceun of all lie ! . :1L.V.7 071 tile rlbj , Cl, which he - fled ( '.,"l'e with ihal exceed )n--he had sepp . res . stfthetata I t ilt when Gip!. 'Kohyti had pressedlnpilk a return . • ~.,c ' t , Ins live hundred guineas, -he acquainted Mrs.: • set:trite well, the 'eirctimstitnee,'whotold hint to go : L - k to Cipi. Tc;tyll, , Wilh a t)010, purPorling to be Nyrut...J, 1") , the Duke of YOrk, in these worth :--"•I in ~... ite,ved yoilr tiiite: and Tonyn's bestows shall nIiS Wit t w ,t , y beiV n to Crptain : Toilyii ii order to colisinee hint that ,Mss. Clarke end Sandie) poistAiwd -the infltience they pretended to, al iii that the prOmution would reef:it as it Was, tHile:Pi It. suif..lo,l the money to remain to purchase their exerooll, Anirt ter note, also purporting to be written by his Royal llielniess; was sent on flic.•day 'hen Major Tohytt was gazetted, in these words".".". " T "llYti kt' Ili bd.gaZt.itcl tn.-night." When making tilt , ditkekhur... to Colonel Hamilton, 'Sande') said he , . . Might (1;...,tr 0 y tins paper, ou which Col. H. told • ' him ;11 -ilui means to (.1i that, but to ro to the Alai ..) and till the whole• truth, philiting out,'at the satue time, the danger be would incur iii • telling any false lie ( ng. The tatter note bad bee n d e li vere d to Tonyn. r ol. fleinthon, as advi se d by Mr. Adam, at - Leff:lying run this iefornution, went back ro-(,'.ipt. Sander), re peated his ilijuneLions as tO the line of. -conduct he ought to pur se; 4nd got a cony ofll le titc,t note., COL Hamilton alto adt , lsetititit:n to attend either to Mi. I - Lowten, or Mrs. Cierke had Mr. Wardle' ‘,'`.,ll°•ll3*ti . - sent for him on his.ervival m town, 'to untie:go an e x 4 tuination previous to his :nein • ' t , g, ex:tom...Li allw -- lea l,' r, but. to 'weir aloof front all parties. Atter some "nsultatiOtt it was:resolved, that Me. Adam shored . ;, inform his Royal Hightle..); of this eircumidatic..., that r , We IW Members of _Parlia ment , a nd J u d ges i n th i s 4 :3,e, .could not b e ' Made. deildsitories of h, but , that it mnst be .made . public, and that . •• .:olotiel i, klamilton ,should ,again, visit, Captain Sauden• and discover Whether, as a strong impression bad been •.. made on his meet, the note. really Was in the hand . ~ Vriting ot the Wire .of York. Mr. Adam had .accordingly waited oh hii Royal Highness,, Who, on being told of the circumstance, ;expressed laialt• k , convinced, that the• note mu s t b e a forgery, alai „wished extremely 'tliar the matter should be (Ito ; . le' llghly examined into. As for the Rote respetting the (1 -...tet e i ntr 6 -, his Royal -Highness. could- nut :pc)" , wri tten say it might not,. be his, as he ►steul.l. Wye l tten 6uell an answer to any letter making an t teed Anquiry subject. nil thebject. , 'The next day (Sunday) H.• Al , flMilton . saw Copt. 'Sander, vlio said to him You will be very angry with tree, for since you ' saw , Ine, I have destroyed the Note." " {;riot! God-! too Cul. H. you have not surely lone any, thing ';) "ell."--" It was not of so loncti constquettel: , . Areturned Captain Sanden), and besides they have bel n t it."—He had thus submitted to the House all knew of this important- adlur. • The destruction 01 th. note rested on Captain Sanden's word. if it Was still in existence, and could be proved a forgery, it wouldisliew, how people had been im- P ose ,n upon by MrS. Clarke and her agents; while • wine other hand, if proven to be the hand-writing .cif tie Duke of yolk, i t , wink: he necessary to call Ott his Aloy a l Highness io explain..how it happened. i- . Alter some -genera • l 'co nc luding; libservations, ..he Rimed to call in Capt. Sandell. )4r . AD - AX corroborate=d the preceding statement . ' o,,.trvety. part whi c h was omit clear, accurate, .and • correct. He r; r4LI 'llat bad passed in his,inter- I,• , "' W with the Duke of Yolk, "hu had dtsii"Sq. ~ • ,disavowed the reeolle6tioe or poisibdity of having. written such a note, and,mentioned Mr. Whitbread', r,ol;•ci kitenry Petty, and others, as the persons to whOrri"tbe circninstince hid in the first instance beet-communicated. Capi4ain'SANDEti;txamined by die. CHANCELLOR oft he. Exciluo.usit. Q: When witness was examined on theinittcr of Captain Tonyn's `promotioni did he state all the particulars lie knew ? A. To the best of my recgiledion. Q Did he not' keep back any important fad ? • A. No, not th,,r I recoiled. • Q. lie fortnedy stated, that when Captain Tonyn applied to hitia..to-have the money•he had lodged returned,, he had, atter smile convers.ition, pwv,,iled on him to atilter the mat= tot, to rest for a week or ten as it then stood. Is this all the conversation he can hinig to his reeolledion of what passed in that interview ? A. Yes. ' r Q. Can ha reeolleO any of the vi;uniepts he adduced to persuade Capt. Tonyn to acquiesce in the . peoposal to'sutret She mosey to remain some time longer? A. Ido not recol: lest particularly, I told him he had better let it lie tWo or three days s as I had reason to suppose in that time his pro. motion wo'uld he efreeted. Q. Did he tell Mrs. Clarke that Capt. Tonyn was 4issa. tistied, and wished his nrottey.returned ? • Yes. Q. fiat passed int that occasion,? A, As I stated before, she 's aid he rVAS'it sitabby fillow, and bid me go arid' desire Mm to w4t with patience. Q. Cater. Sandell, recul lea yourself thoritighly. that you may not be taken by surprise. 'ls this all you can recollect; A. Ail I can recoiled. . • . _ _ Q. Was there arty paper sham) to Copt.,Tonin/ A. Mrs. Clarke gave me a noto,to show him _ Q. Theo he has not stared all he recolleaed A. I took the note train M.s; Clarke, sa)iug 'he'had better wait. lie doubted tltat 1 had any one to apply to. > He doubted that I contd. procure him the situation, and I took him the note to convince hint. Q. Then you did use other arguments besides those you Lave stated. Tnivhorn was the letter addressed ?A. I can• not say whether .or nut it was to me; it was on a scroll of paper; Q.. What ws, the note > A . I cannot charge my memory. Q. Froin whom ? from Mrs. Clarke /Or me to show 'to Captain Tonyn, to induce him to wait. •,. , Can ite rceotled the words ? A. It was to the effbEt to wait with patience tor two (;azet tes. • witnesi was admonished to 'attend while his preceding evidence was read. Q. Did lie see. Airs. Clarke'write the note ? A. I do not .recolleci; I.am not sure I did, or (lid . 00t. Q. Is he quite stare he received it.irom her? Q. 'Did he see her more than once alter Capt. Tonymcorn. munielred hiS wish to have his_money returned A. I can. nor meat lea., Q. Tkre was no mare that one note ? No 1 had only th.ir'one piece of per I mentionetl. Q. Did he give it to Capt, Tonym? A. reeolleci nether:l, gave it. to Capt." Tonyh, or what I urd with it. •Q. -Wa's- if in Airs. Clarke's. handwriting A. I rather • was. • Q. Has he always stated this part of the case in the same way I Did h.: never tell any one this' note 'wa; in the. hand writing or the Uuke of York_? . A. Not that 1 rei.olleCt. Q.. Ulm positive ?-. A. 1 believe so. Q. I)Oe's he know "Colollo ? A. Pe'ricelly well, 1 I,A the honour to serve under hint. Did Ile.repr,::4til this pat ted rite case in the same man-= tier to hint ? A. I asked his'ativice, and n:lgtcd chiefly what 1 ic i iew, dutl 114 v,.. now "recollect • ' .• Q. Captainredoiled yourself. Did you not state that .the hots, yea twit to Captain lonyn was in the hand, writing of the :juke of V ore: I A. I do nor recolicet,thett 1 dot: Q. LACI' you rot show him the note? A. I had it 'IA to ;hew. him - ... Q. Now. Captain Santicn, I will, put a question. to you which will it little surprio you. Din nut yt.o give Colonel . 11. , ttiliton rite note to copy A . Not that I . know of. :Q. You Must sorely know that tact, which must Nye 31. i ..p..:11-d so lately. sinpHel , wnetiter or not you gave „in ill nuti: to copy ? A. 1-cannot it to my fccollection. Q 11 . the - note »as not in your p , 4J,S;iIJII you surely could recollect this' circumstance ?. A. I rather think nuw tittle . was something in thenote. Q. 'Wiwi, ritd yOu recoiled this? A. It must have been wncit Col. it saw the note. 'Q. you.mean to say tnere W,14 II note which you showed to Col, I-141110ton Ai Yes, t tlihkritac'waa. Q, Was it 11)e.Sene stiewett to Capt. Tony!: ? A. I tu9poSe so, I don't rect.lled. Q. Did you telllign icwatthe same? A. I don't recol. Jet I. • - • Q. Your nicrn , ..ry, at 11!.0 &Win; a c.; is not ,no Very accurate as it is sOpleturrie) atter‘varch.: I re;.caL the question. A.•l stiowedieolonel Hamilton the note. Q. Y...u.nuw• recollect it ? A. Perfectly. Q. it? A. 1 believe it is mislaid. . When did you see it last ? A. six days.so.• • Q. This nine you" did not . lecolloct to have c ai s t e d'at t h e beginning of your ; have yuu looked for it late. iy I A. Yesterday, andttied•y Detour. R. Yet could not redullettit this evening? - A. If I could have-totnal it I should have brought-it In-re with ins. Q,. You saw it six days ago 1 A. Yes. Q. Was not that the day on which you Wet: examined I A. I was•eiatnitied on the loth. • Q. Did you'sce the note on that day ? The.day be. fan: Gt. ine day ewer. e.!llayg y?ti, done all you . could to find it within the last two days, when'you sz*cried . for it ? A. Ycs. 9. Ito& you ri,ver s4icl it was destrOyed ? A. No. - .Q.. Diu , tou i not say so to Cut. Hamilton A. No., Cut. Hamilt ri expressly desire you not to tle,roy that note ? • A. Certainly. •Q. More Ina:l'olkt ? A'. (.can'treolleel. Q • Did. he not tleoce ytiu not to dottcl it, when you - just ,n the inrair to limn at Portsmouth? A. Yes ; ha told 'toe to be ['Pit and trite in My evidence. He c ould not tell use hot to tiostroy tlic , paper, because he•• did nut know I had it r 'I scarcely ,knew it Myself. Q. Upon tkit occasion he cold you not to destroy it ? A. lie certainly did. ' • Q. Whin, did Colonel Hamilton take the copy of the note? A.' The aitcr he c.une to town. Q,. Whei•e ? A. 1.4 the Coffee.house, in Si uthanipton-row. • Q. \Vila, lie tookit, did he tea y - uu not to destroy the on. ". • Q. 'Cheri he tUld.youthis a sec'and time? A: Certainly. l)id you see him again in the course of the saute day ? A. 1 believe I did, in the lirtili Collte.huose. Q. What diit them? A. said had no refer enc.: at all to, tins : stilijc,et. I do. not recoiled 4 word., Try to revive your memory. Diu nu not atlvi,4o ypti not to destroy it ? A. No. • These questions beinA r . eiterated; the witbess Con* tinued to ieny that any conversation on the subjea passed at the 'British Coffee-110;4e, any other time inbsequent Ilk; tnectin itt.the'inortitpg Bouthttilipion-r•ow. Q. bid pin trot ;:tAe t Colon :A PE that you sup -1:0.,:l hewwilci be very at,Bry with ybu for destroy note 1-4 No ; there hover was suet, a con vet szttion betwLeti us: ..Q.Never at that nor any other tithe Never Q: Did you tell him there was another note hewn to Captain Touyn .at. the time his promotion ivas Gaietted - ?—A. I had not another, and there , fore could.upt tell him so. Q. Did you 'lover tell him you had it.—A. Never. Q. Never ? And that you hadgiven it to Tonyn ;' A. No. Q. When did you see this paper last )-4. Five or six days ago. • Where ?—A.,In my own room. • Q. Since your last examination A. No.' Q. Are you sure it was - the day before or the day afteri—A. That is what , l said. • Q. Did any one else site it there No. Q. Has any 1304 seen it since you came to 'town but Colonel Ha-inbuilt I,—A. No. Q. Where gid you put it when you saw it last? A. Among-other papers in my bureau. Q. Aro.you certain you Wit:. not got it now? - - A. It i4Ltpistaid I believe. Q. Did you ever carry it in your imeket .Nevor. 0, Had, yt Wit.h yon, i 4t, How, .cant ,you to .haveit.,4 _Southampton . rode Coffee House, when iou say you never .ca:• riei it in your picket ?—A. I took it to show Col; Hamilton. Q Had you pi it with you at the British Correc t-Lyme ?—A. No. Q. Where do you live ?—At Lyon's Inn'; where I had .been, atter, coming- from Southampton-row. In answer to questions from Mr. C: BItADS4AIV, I he replied, that he was not ..to receive a hirthing on Tnnyn's promotion, and that 'his anxiety to seo it Gaietted proceeded from Mrs. Clarke's being much in want or money. Q. By Mr. WHITIntEAD.--Can you by any pas sibility produce the now i—A. I have it not about Q. Repeated.—A. I wlll find it if I em. Q.: Is it posiible to_ find it I—A. I suppose so. . 'Q. Upon what grounds Becabsel mislaid it among other papers in my bureau. Q. \Alba. has access to your bureau ?—A. My Q. Are you,certain it is not in the possession of your wife or any other person ?—A. Yes j quite. Q. 'lave you given it to any person to destroy ? A. No. Q. To any person to give to ady,person to destroy it ?—A. - No. Q. Is it or is it nOt destroyed ?—A.,, Not to my knowledge. lam very clear it is not destroyed: • Q. Where did you put it when you last saw it A..ln my bureau. Q. Have you the key about you ?—A. No. Q. How are you 8o clear it is not destroyed ? A. Because I never desired ir,. . , Q. Then it is in.existence.?—A. I hope it is. Q. How,long betbre your examination did you see it last ?—A. latenot recollea. Q. In what room is your bureau ?--7A.• In my slunk; room. _ • •Q. Have you searched yOur bureau fur I loveilkoked for it, but could not find it. ' Q. What reason hitd you tor 'Saying, in the be ginning of your evidence, that no •such paper ever existed? ---cl. From an,unpleasaitt circitiyistanceA, and 1 could have wished to have forgotten it. • - _ _ Q.. What it that ciscomstancc ?—.A. The whn!e of the business ti aniileasant. Q. - Mi hy, having cone to the bar to disclose every Oleg, did you think this partiealar alone unplea sant ?—A. Not this but the whole. Q. When Col., Hamilton took the copy, did he read it ?—A. No. • - . ' . Q. How did ynu describe it tei,him when you .smt mentioned it I—A. Speaking of Major !.l'uttyn'i; pro motion, I said I had a paper, which uotiid throw some light on it. ity whom did you state it to bave been writ-, ten ?—A. I cahoot say, •Q. Can you ,ake upon you to'. say you did nut state it to be written by the Duke ot"Yotkl- 7 -A. No ; 1 Hoyt said so. . , . . Q. Do you know Mrs. Clarke's hand-writing ? A. SutnetialeS. Q. Wits it Iter's ?—A. I cannot say. 4. Did she tvrite iu diti",:rout hands to you, or in' her own ?—A. I have (lad letter 3 so ditfoeut., that I could not su,,pose Wein 'written by the same hand. Q.. Hew cattle the wiitieSs to sac', that the note is not io his nureati,• it he:has nut searched all his• papers i—A. I think I,itave starched toy papers. aci not fiat wittiess say, at the bey,initing, the 1114 it wassowitig to sutm ttiat U) question has. v!cti lost ; what. particularly implcas.itit in that I—A. By my hating lost it. The WitlVSI was ordered to withdraw. 'The STRAKER' rose and said, that it was highly incumbent on the Committee to adopt a proper and , a -Parbarueotary course of proceeding with respect to the conduct of the witness who has just nQW lett the bar. lie believed, truattie testimony Salt.den had given, that there was but one impresiiun and opinion its tlu Cothinittee, naively, ttim Huxley Sauden,..in evi.%:nce, was guiltyy - of a , zross prevaric.ition. Juc qu(-,tiou that reniained - for the Commiitee itdOpi. Sotpe re- Solution relative to the condutt of, the wiiness,-aml report tho . satne to the flotte. The CIIANCELLOtt of the Excnconsa moved, that in consequence or the r gross prevarication o Captain Huxley S.indettin delivering his evidence at . the Bar of the House, he . should be committed to the casto4yof the Serjeaut tit Atlas. ' Lord Fol. si•oN a was of opinion, that 'Capt. San. den ought to be committed in the fult.initance, and that .the " Serjeant at Arms' , ought to form no part of the Resolution. • The House then resumed, and the report of the Ceintnittee was forthwith made and a motion Was made for committing Capt. Sanaa to the custody of the Sex:pant at Mints. Mr. PEtt6'LVAI, thought it more advisable to corn mit.liitn to the custody of the Serjeaut at Arms, be cJase it tuiglit he found - necessary'to send him to his locl2,ings, ticconipaniedby the.Serjealit at Arms, for The ptirpose of searching - for the note ; and .11,,n be cause it might be Inerid.expedient to liavC him near the House - , in order that he •might he b r otigki t the more easily to the b.tr case it Itti , l4t . tie..iec;inek) itecessark then:fine hoped the coLtiMitteu u (mkt resolve to coattnit him to th;.: custody of the Serjeant at Arms. • • , L Ord FOLKSIONE,. for Ale rellSoll3 1,10e41 by, the Right lion. Gent'Ctii3ll; :::4ret.:d to I'l 4 :law tinendnient. • Pettenvak farther moved, that orders be given to the Serjeant at Arms to allow no ipter course between Capt. Satiden and any'other person. It was also moved by an [ion. Metnber; - that'all the papers of Captain Oatiden should be . immediately searched. 6 The STRAKER said, that it was a question l o t il } e'. Cotomittee to, consider whether that is as flier. my t advisable mode of proceedui 0, or whether it would . not be be , t14,1- to search fur the note alone ; i llerbdp the latter mode would be ic. , un,l less objeaionab!e. Lord 'Tzgrce and Mi. .I:IANKs spoke as to the matter of form. Here the Serjeant Arms reported at :he Bar that Capt. Sanders way ill . custody. The -SPEAKER put the,quegtion, which was the:, most advisable modei, Captain Sander to hi s ' part meats, and' talie,all Litt; rapt a:, Ct . the prisoner, or this paper only, in which nientic,-.1 is tu.tde of the business of Major Tonyn ? Tbit Setj.tatn at. Arms, repotted at the Bar e .t bat the prisoner; Captain Sanden,. wished to be tirooo444:h. again to the Bar, for the purpose of gtatit% a crzr tain lit upositioui On the motion- of Mr. PettenvAt, the SrEArElt took the 4enie df the House on•thi;; ja - nr,,ition, viten it was agreed to bring the prisoner to the Bar. On - being placed at' th,,,Biir, the SP&Atrit said, ii) a tirm and dignified tone of voice:, .tinit if the pi isoner had any proposition to state to the fiouse, that n, , w Was his time. Whereupon 'the 'pit - Ater expre , ;st di in very humiliating' tents, his sincere sorrow at „e itnproper , ,condqt he,hati exhibited before this FL'. nourable-House; and was proceeding, in tfil% . sra-ti, when the SpltAxEit adnionishcd hini - tostat'l to t: e lipase what he had tti 5 ty. The pri3 O : l ,. n • in t 0 st , ll ,d, that the note in question ,was neither 101 l Our ilv. stroyed; it lay at t'is (:hainhab, and he: thotOtt , were beim - in:L . l;O to-go thlther, he couiLl ea,ily lay . his hands on,it. The note was ~.givell f, i .i. a) it. t• 0 sliewo to 1,13j0r Tonyli i .an4 if ;Ittteti, alit irk i„io.: motion could not be accomplhii'd, unt-css he p. 4 the money--it also. stated , that j,\lrs.:Ciarite v t, to receive 5001: and Mr, Donovan 251. ft: it was the plrasute of this lioliiittrtib...e __(,l 14 ' 1 .us&, he would go 111,.1 f et ch it. He %% 4 .4 tptaily at a loss to s:ty by wiA:tu the note was wriitell. SrEaxkit askt.d the pris'4:ter if he jiad other propo3niutt to make to the lionse—A he prisoner iepried, that ho had tint. --He was then ordered to be remanded. • , SPEAK ER signed tne wuranr, which em powered the Serjeant Arms to accotnpany (Il s e Fri, sure to Lis ap.....r:nterits i.t t 4 yote.s.init and the re cause iris papers to 'be' starched for the note, and or dered the Serjeant to do .his duty itninediately. • Lard HENRY- PETTY postponed his rno - tiou rela tive to 'the Cintra Convention, to Thursday next. •T41e...1-T6use went again into the Committee, - to consider the charges against tliP Doke of York. MRS. CLAAKE EXANIINIti) L Mit. peticuvAL, Doea the witness recollect any pavticulor note that pa,srd between - herand Ca pt. Sandell, in con.. ettquence.Ol application Cron . ] Major Tcoy;t ? A. I Cimmit recoliet any thing about buch a thing. -Q. Does the witness - recolt...6t Captain Sanekm talked to, her on the aubjea Ldo not remember, . U. DOes the "'‘.t itocb.s-ri-cOliefl giving any n6te, to Captain - B:Auden, diiezed to Major "fonyo, to which is. was exprellied, that tubes t tc tooi4 which bad been promised :was adi'aticed, that hip promotion enu;d not be procured recuNCl of oo such t 1 cite. I)nes the witneis positively say, that c:Je never gave such a note purporting to be vs.iii.tk n by the Duke of Yotk to Captain Sabden ccrtaitily did not. • • • t 4. It e rn • I then to titbierstand the witness that sho %N . holly nuraut of at►y• such transaihion 'Totally so. Q. In poillt•of fa i 4 the witness never delivered note k.) tins et3.7.-e,t to Captain Sandell, lA/rine:l either in her ,fAn or- iii the hand of any other ?—A. 1 think I did hot, but cannot say positively. • 1-lad s:•,e written such a' note lier,el,l, won't' She not have..lerneinbered it 1--A. I think twOuld.. Q. Had l',Uch a note beeir Written by any other, and deli , . eras by tier to CaptsinStinden, is it nor possible -, 01.4 she coultl - ittneinber It. he meant to inNinuate that it was a paper ~ vritten by the Duke., uf can . pnaitively stitte, ,1 never' ga y. e up.iinyipaper.wlitted by 11411 till niteiy. liy Lure F‘:z.E.s . roue.--Dik.l the witriessever hear tliat:a.note..purportioir .to tit written .by Duke Yui w:is .L.litervll by Caik‘aill 10 4 \11,1)i• Timyik I aid W.A. U. By Air. I'ii.ttcbv.AL.-4.1.1ght opt the Nvltne4 i4f4topate to Allor Tonyn that i4t.cli a note, purport. Isis; to be the I.)uke ot..Yotk's, Nvos in her. pos,ei own 1 might thitig to him ;. he was %ery capabie of writing .4tid delivering such" note-himself. Q. By Mr. Alderman Coma4.Does the witness reeoVect that Major Tonyn sent lwr a t0r...tge,,.t11:1 unless-Ilk promotion Wai expedited he would draw hiq motley.? tier not rceofloi^i. the wit ileyi rt oitt;: t !0 11;)v -wish .ro reeeit e airy alone) tru . k..Nl,,jor ?-- A. I do not. By • Mr. 13a ms n.—;.l.7t)es wittieti recolh:•6l ever to rec,..‘ive any applicatiort , froto toptain Siwien rein tiveto.the eaerpise of herinfinene: Yes, Cap. taio Sanden was extternely noxious to get out. Of 't•hz • 46ilt. Regiment, and with a ti is.!‘fitt.) that made such air appliCasion. (). Was Carlin Sam! , .t . ) to receive any part , ; c M ajor . Ipi - 46's 0100t , y . , it ever he was 'promoted thronglb your influence'---A.. 1 hefieto he wits,' bes eause - 1‘1,6()r AvAs a very t ~ •tterous man, and was.not Veiy scroptdous about hi, money. 'DoeS tehlernber tspraio Smiden Ray, expeeteil if i\l.i j ur It I4as 'witness heard :Inv thin7;lW the examina tion'of Capt. Smntieu this Not at '.vorcl. • Q. if-the ever arty thing, to Captain Slnci4,l) rulativti,lo a note purportitig lo be :writ ten. I) . v the Duke of York, isotliti she not renlertiber ti6iv A. Certainly. Mr. Retb, being ordered .; to be' called in, Mri. asked;, i+.J3 tfrero ever H. precedet4 . for ex- WO WI t il6ses at one and the same time, 101; . 'gy 'ht... I •liiittcrvni....;--I)oos Mr. Weld know the ?—A. Yec, I do. Cl.'• wi.int nrinie did you know' h'et ?—A. By the rlatn:!4)f (a, 1)41 the I,vitness kni6ve . . her by the • . flame of Nirc Clarke, 'or any other nine bilt 4 nowler 1 never .‘l4l. •- . • (4. you alway! speak to her by that name? aut. Q. Did Mr. Drawler ever edlreit lrer by the ne of Mrs. Dow ler r-A. f I always understood so. d. 1:Y0 411 e witness hear arty person address her by the , name of Clarke ?—A. I did not. Wits 4he visited by any who cyilied her by tiny other name eueept that oi Dowler I.—A. Never my knowledge. Di ft 'the witness always believe her to be the nt . • Mr. llnwler i—A. always did bi..lieve Q. By Mr. litiamutT.Was Mr. Reid:atraid the credit of his house in.giving these answers N—A. Not at all. 4. By Me. "VVAant.t..- 7 Did Mr. Dowler always lodge at the witness's Hotel, and than Lady only uci. ?—A. That is the tad. (Mr. Relit withdrow.)--Mts. Clarke . escpressid fervvnt wish in ask 4 question oC the Chown LAW . • yers.—(4 Mr; tiEttesPOßD, addressing himself to Mr. War. tile, said he could not refrain iron) anniudverting on part of th._i !lon. Member's eontlua in tefett.uty w