The Sun. — London, England, 1808-06-04 00:00:00

,r I.II3P!,RIAL PARLIAMENT 1 , JIQUSE OF PEERS. FRIDAY, JUNE 3. ROXBURGH APPEAL. Mr. Boyle was heard for the Respondent. Fur ther proceedings postponed to Wednesday next. The Military Inquiry • Bill, and twelve Private Bills, received the Royal Assent by Commission. The Commissioners were, the Lord Chancelldr, the Earl of Dartmouth, and Lord Walsingharn., _ . Mr. Wharton brought up , the Military Inquiry Revival Bill; which was laid on the table. Mr: Irving, from the Port of London, preiented certain Accounts, ending the sth of April, 1808 ; which were ordered to be laid on tht table.—Ad journed to Wednesday. ROUSE OF COMMONS. illID11.Y; JUNE “. . A Message from the Lords desired the attendance of the Rouse at their Lordshipa”, Bar, When the Royal. Assent was given by Commission to several • Bills, for which see the. proceedings of (he Lords. Land Revenue Bill was read a third time, and' passed. 'The Irish Glebe House Bill was read a second time, co NlMitted, and ordered to be read a third time. The Eire Shooting ,Bill was brought in by I.lr. Cfiapi its, re id a first 'time, and ordered to be read. a t► second time o.n,Wednesday. _ The Loan Bill was read a second time, and or. dered to be committed 'on-Thursday. :The Annuity Bill was brought in, read a first time, and Ordered-to be read a second time on Wednesday. Several other Bids vere forwarded in their various-stages: Mr. FULLER brought in a Bill-for Freventing the Spreading of Small 'Pox Infection, Read a first and , second time, committed, and ordered to be printed as amended. Lord FoLr.sTotirtt thought the Bill ought to stand ever till the next Session 91 Pad:la.? ment, Mr. FuLt.ER acceded. The Bill was report ed, and ordered to be read a third tune this day three months. • SMALL NOTES. •Mr. HusatssoN having given notice of, a Motion for leave to' bring in a Bill to regulate and restrain the issue of Promissory Notes re-issuable, stated, that on consideration he was disposed to coincide -gene rally in the representations of those wbo were- of opinion • that this credit, as well •as every other,. ought to be left as free as possible. • But much MiS• chief and confusion:arose from the froquentissnes Of very small Notes, to the amount of 15 or 20 Oa , the abuse_of, which was .very.general. To Obviate this evil, he moved for leave to bring ih a Bill to prevent the issue of .Promissory Notes under, the amount of 205. 4 Mr,MOMPSON represeMed , the'propriety of guard ing against the issue of checkS by one p4rtner of a banking house. on. his fellow partners for teu or Ofteen Mr. Husxissor was aware of the variety of ibapes in 4 , 1,ic1t the abuse existed, and. had t4ken proper advice previous to the framing of this Bill,. as to the best meads of covering every species of abuse, Sir JOHN' NEWPORT represented the variety and extent of frauds formerly pratlised by the issuers of .ribtes under il, in hetet - L(li ; and was therefore de. airotts rbdt ri-rnedy by proper TeSisiotto'golowa ue applicr.l i,) that country as soon as possible•. tilt.P.ttNecc, said the circuLttioti of these small note; was owing' to the deficiency of silver coin s end wishLd Ministers to apply the only effedual t‘anetly, which was a new silver coinage. —Leave was given to 4rini; inthe. HACKNEY COACHES. 'Mr. Elusicissot.i rose, to trove for leave to bring in a Biil for the better regulation of the FareS of 13acliney Coaches. According to a former it it was provided, that when the price of oats waiubovo' one guinta a quarter, an increase of eo per • cent. should take place on Hackney Coach Fares in sotng cases,' and 3t) per cent. in others. The price .of oats had of late years been almost uniformly. above a guinea a quarter, but the uncet minty of the calcula tion 01 tlit%a4Vance on all fares, had given rise to great ahnses, without providing sufficiently for the !mere:it or tie coaclitnaster. In order to gUard against these ahuses'in future, and to give the coach. 'baster a fair and ecrt.iin profit, he proposed to crOtince ti . ,.e(.1 regulations in the present Bill: - It was also meant t o include a provision to guard against the pi - eilice now tery prevalent, and very in; i tirious to hackneycopehmen; of totage-coadhes befoligaii to thelillages near town, taking up passengers in one patt of the town, and setting- than down in anotlier, within the proper anti exclusive limits of the hack nev-c6.tchrireb.—Leave - was given to bring in the SgottETAit at. WA it obtained leave r(i 1,1-',l")g in a Bill i'() Oiliceis to, Account for vai'd toft:iern nu,kr o.e Acts. The CliANcLt.Loa 01 the Exclir.QUEIZ 1110Ved for the Adjfitunment of the! Cointuittee op the Curates' Bill till, \V,liwidny, lie.. pit.Pi),c±;;4l sl;(itAci be the &tarot' lifter ti n t rcreess:—Ordered. 1)(1r. -Waixttpoti , brought ul.l' the 13..epr,rt - id the Scottib Bill.--Ordefed,tch . Le.te:id 4 third 11iT);....4.0) \Vedoetiday. • Th 4 llt-solatiotv;o(tht: cwrituittee on the Anirri ean Trade were. 11,4 - sorted, and a Bill ordered sva 'tVserwards brotp lit in by toi.F., read a'tir, , it - and ordered to beread a ?e -;mid time on Wedn4sday. COURTS MARTIAL, LYTI'LIro?I, pursuant to hii nutice, ro - .ys: to rnovc for kayo To bring in ar3ilf to Atnetid.the Con stitution <if Courts He was aWare of the onje..-Tion again , t ihtLif,ering with the prerogativc.--- Bbt tl ititt....rit..rence that tie proposed would be fir iron) infriszing thrjust rights of tne Crown. In. ro . age h.,cl tht:Cro . wn the puWer of Tnaniging the whole AdiuluiitratiOil uf 'the rny itS tintint4ecl discretion, The Iii t ? . „11 Cunstitble and Earl Marshal in aricienit rimei regulated the afitirs . .of toe. , ifIAY under 4nr rcvonsibilny. On 'the attainder at that ., ford, Duke ot fitiek'n . 2)-airn; High Constable in the r !ign of Henry the Eighth, that , Monarch f,isSbined and exercised the Whotc powers of the 'sttperit,tend vice and .2 - ,ovvrottlent the artny. But the arbi 7 itr.try p;inciplcs at thJ Monarch, and hjsimmediaie stte,:cors, rcndered thpse.practices no. precedent for the jiist;ce of modern times: Alter the tievolution, •when better principles and juster notions iprevailed, William the Third conceived that by, the preroga,, rive he had not pow.ers to punish the mutiny of a Scotch regiment at Dumbarton, on the appointment of a .Foreign 'Officer, the Duke of Schomberg, to be their Colonel. King William applied to Parliament fur powers a - del:lstate to the case, and Parliament paSse ed the Mutiny AA; which was a sieindiug precedent for Parliamentary interference in the jndicial admi-1 niitration of the 'army. He aliowed that Courts Martial were, generally. speaking, so constituted es to form the most proper tribunal for judging mili tary cases. But he considered it es a defeat, that the legal Officer who attended t 6 do justice between the Prosecetor and the Crown, in the management of the prosecution, .weis, in, leaf, ao.Officer of the Crown. The power of that Officer ought, there fore,' to be under proper guards. He adverted , to a recent case, (that of Mr. Cochrane Johnstone) in which the officer was acquitted by the .Court, but dismissed from his. Majesty's service by an invisible and unaccountable power. He did not mean to. 'Cleuy the right of his Majesty to employ or to diimiss what cfficvrs lie pleased. ' But when a court Mar- tial was einploydd, it* was right that its decisions• should be• carried into. effeet, or proper reasons be given to the contrary. He adverted to' the superior situation of the Navy on this 'head, and cited the case of Capt. Coffin, tried at Halifax by Cburt Mar tial, and ordered to be distnissed his ship. The Ad iniralty assumed the right of dismissing Capt. Col tie from the Navy altogether. But Coffin appealed by memorial to his Majesty against the decision; mid the Judges to whom the matter was referred, con sisting of persons not inimical to the Crown, among whom were Lord Kenyon, Lord Loughborough, Sir James Eyre, and Sir Francis huller, reversed the de cisicin of the Adniiralty, and re-establishes the right 'of Cepte Coffin to be employed in his profession...— ! He saw. no rea3bn why a similar controul and revision should not exist in the, army. The special cluty,of LMilitary Officers to the Crown, and their looking for ' ipromotion to the Crown only, devoted them p,articu s ! lady to the Crown, and rendered their deco ions at ;least nut properly open to be enforced in rigour by the Crown. - He thought the right of Parliitmentary .intervention clear; the exercise of that right he pro posed should he Moderate.' Ile proposed that the sentences of Courts Martial should be immediately ' declared without reference' to the Crown ; and that iit case of acquittal,, the decision of it should be filial, and carried into immediate. c::ecution ; and, If the Court, Or parties, or witnesses should be guilty of any improper cOndedeluring the trial, the Crown should be empowered to lowish them. He moved for leave to bring in ii Bill to expedite the decisions of Courts Martial, and to preveet undue interference therewith. '. • . , . The 'SECRETARY at WAR represented that the measure proposed could not possibly be entertained - in:the present Session, .as it 'was incompatible w ids several' provisions in the Mutiny Att, partieularly with that which bound Members of Courts Martial to keep their' deersiohs secret till they should kw revised - by the Crown. But in answer to the gene ral reasoning of the Hon. Member, he should argue, without going back to the times before the Revolution, which afforded no precedent applicable at present, that the interference proposed would be injurious. The Hon. Gentleman allowed that his Ma jesty ought always to have the power of judging what Officers he should emplby or dismieS. He Would as' then, what difference the .alteratioe propesed in the powers of Cowes 'Martial could 11,nike in the ease allUded to (that of Colotiel Johnstone) ? SupPositee • him acquitted by the Court, the. Hut). Member al4 lowed'his Majestytnight still dismiSs hirn. The irn, Mediate promulgation of the sentences of the Courts .Martial would be in many, cases cruel to the.Officeri themselves ; for it would deprive his Majesty et the exercise of that beneticial mercy by which he often remitted a censure br reerimarid, in consideration of matters diet were specified with honour to the Uitie cer in question, so as to leave hiM still in tlee ser vice : with tenimpairedeand ,sometimes even eealted ehara i tler. The peal service and the Military were distiat irt chargfer, constitution and GOverreeent, 'Fiore laws ,aepliceble to the.one were frequently in applicable to the other. There Was no good groti l et tor interfering with that system !sy setneh the army bad now been governed for a. century, without any ,complaiet on the part 'of the soldiers or time people. Any other eystem would, he was sure, be attended with injury. The mutual revision of the Mutiny Bill was the proper . Parliamentary contruul, and *a WO amply suffitient for it , k . ry gilud, purpose. . • ..' . • , Sr Veerzcis 'l3l.lllDE:rri from the options f a & cif eiaval divip!itte hi:Mg.. adequate to ie coy good purpose, .saw. no reasee • why ,the more jest an d equitable constitution or Nmei CentteM areal should ' not extend to the Army. He adverted to the case 01COlenel„ Cochrinie' JoheStone, and' ht4isted • on the hardship 'orpuiijshiqg .that Gentleman, after lee: had been cempletely eacquitted by the Cutter 11startial. • . , '. Sir A. 'WELLESLEY 'observed that the measure proposed, would, go tiut only to alter the, Mutiny .4\ t,: ten.elso all toe Articles of ear, The Navy was' the'cltiratUriatie and celistitutienal fOree'elfiritain, acid ; May theiefore he governed 'mere by the re, gelatieiss of the Legislature. But the Army was a: iiew fore; arising but Of The • extrd , )rdiitary exigeik , cots' of iiicidern times, and, from every ceosideratido , of expedieoFy and necessity,' must be left under the; corniced - of the• Crown. . ' . . ' General . FITiPATRICE; was ready to admit that Courts .Martial required a reform-to render the eon - sthution of them, and come of . their tortes of pros ceedinge.more e i eisisteett ewitli the general spirit of British law.: Bet the preseei proposition 'went moo" far. If time power of the Cr6Ak;tl was - toe munch ,re-' bleed, ilie.,Army would le:., omue highly, dairPL.rous . to the People, ;kuid';o the Cre , ,,va also. He alldWed m .the extree hardsliiii. (it' tl:olonel Cochrane; ''.Johie stone's cam:, alio wound havt.t- been - happyie it lied' , been 'in - hiS power to remove the liariship that Gen- tleman had! Futfered. But its . the power Of the Crown was uoiiiiiited, and very properly' propo4d `'to he left so a 3 to 1V hat Odic , :vs it would employ, he did not see' the'exeicisci of his 'Majesty's dis cretion'could be.remedied by any measure prep o siee net to meddle-With it. The. Commander in Chief?, (Wiling by :the letter of the . Judge' Advoctite., that Colonel Johnstone was, not an Officer agreeabl e to His Majesty; ah,;tatued from recommemileg 'him ii his turn lot prohiotion. The only thing . , that` was open. to rtinedy on that proceeding, was t o seu,,, der the Judge Advocate responsible for 'the advice be should give to his Majesty, and that had alreadv been done by a clause in the Mutiny Act, s adopticl .by the House on- his suggestion. The system of the Navy was inapplicable to the army in many cases : fir instance, a, Captain of 'a Man of War had the power to . order a man to be flogged without a trial. Thefirst Officer in the Army t:ad no such power, .and he should be sorry to think.hcbad. He allowed it: was desirable . that the powers of the Judge Advocate should be defined and understood and recommended .to the Hon. and Learned Gentle man who filled that office, to introduce birnsellsotne sneasure to that effea. After. some explanation from the SECRETARY at WAR . , Mt RshOrt reply from Mr. LYTTLETON, in which he recommended the general principles of his olotion to the consideration of the House, and deseanted, at some le4gth; on the hardship of „Johnstone's case, Mr. LYTTLETON withdrew • his motion. Sir W. ELFORD deferred till 'Wednesday his no , tice of motion relative to Plymouth Dock. On the Motion of the CHANCPLLOR of the Ex- CalliQUEli, it was ordered, that the Houseishonld, at its rising this day, adjourn to Wednesday next. Sir fOUN NEWVORT moved, that the Memorial of Messrs. Simmons, complaining of the detention cf certain Irish Woollen Goods at Liverpool, under 'the demand of .a fluty contrary to the Articles of 'Union, should be printed; and it. being obvious that the charge of breach of the Articles of Union was made good by them ; he gave notice that he should make a motion ,on the subjefit on Thursday next. SUGAR DISTILLATION. • Lord BINNING having moved the second reading of the Sugar Distillation Bill, , Mr. BRAND, while he all&ved that if a. real scar city were apprehended ) such a measure would be ad— visable as a precautionary measure, contended that no such appearance of a scarcity existed. . Mr. MARROTT defended the principle of the Bill, which was similar to the principle that had keen en forced three yeais.ago by the Gentlemen opposite against the West India Planter, on whose recom mendation 'Parliament allowed the "importation of sugar from the East Indies. Adverting to an ex pression used by an BonoUrable Gentleman (Mr. Coke), that the West India Islands were of no More use to this Country,than so many osier beds is the River Thames, he'shewed the advantage with Great Britain derived from 1110'4 islands, by the trade ext. cited, by which even, the lands of that Honourable Gentleman himself owed : their great increase in ta lue. .11etwean this period and 06tober,• 300;000 hogsheads of sugar wou,ld arrive in the various ports of the United Kingdom. AS 400,000 hogsheads Was the extent of the annual consumption 9f the Empire, what, ip the present state of Europe, t 4 become of the surplus? The enemy had avowed. ,that he had two ohjeels in view, the ruin of our trade, and the withholding froM us food: 'This' measure would coupteraa both. these (Meets. Mt. Bpsts spoke against the vided. Mr. BATIIVBST declared that na one was more disposed than himself to espouse the. interests ofagri culture, and to contend that they should be as Lttle interfered with as possiiile; but he maintained that this was a ease in which that interference was ren dered necessary In same pa; ts of the country there certainly was a want of the necessaries of Pt4e, and it appeared to him that by the present BR the dOublef'Objea ‘Aould "be gained of supplying that want, and relieving tkie distress of the West India Planters. . Mr. D.. GIDDY did not objet to the Bill on the • ground of an alledged scarcity, but on the groprid which 41 been ,further stated for it, of its operating Nvourably on. West Iti . dia commerce. Mr. Conn,. defendingr comparison of the West India Islands to osier edi in the ThaMes; observed, that . tliy..‘,vcre the caw tired' islands alone to which he.had alluded. The West India Planter had brought their distresses, in a great tneasurei upon themselves; and he could not consent to giving them relict by op pressing the people of this country. 4it the same time he lamented that they were so distreised, and would be happy could any unobjectionable Mode be devised.of relieving them. 'He slid not contend fbr a high price of corn ; the present increase of bar- Joy to !WS. was owing entirely. to the agitation of this sobjea. •This conformity to fortrler rience. When the crop of ode sort of Corti failed, - the farmer must' have • a larger price' for other de scriptions of corn to. mike -it up. The Distilteric..s were one of the greatest vents for c,qn, if you wisik. for a surplus, you ,must, give every encouragement for consumption that human natur9 can devise. He ridiculed the idea of a scarcity, and expressed his complete" dissent from ll; l e Bill: . Mr. EYRE said, that if he. thought the rneas ,, ra before the HOuse were at All calculated tcoatrea .the intertiftts,of agriculture, or to Pr4duce.that scarcity which it was intended to prevent, he should be one of the last men in the world. to 'vote for it,, The landed interest had taken a folse alarm on the sub ject. He highly approved of relieving the West In dia' Merchants, from wh;ch the Ittnded interest itself would taltiolatcly derive the greatest.benefit. * , ' Mr. WILBERFORCE 'Was of opinion that thointer 7 , est of the Planter and the interest of th e Farmer tviire - not outs' manufacturerti of the 'populous county which he had the honour to represent were eniightened enough to he completely . convinced, of this tact.' So far was this fiom i a rash and injudicious interference with ihe'in-' terests at agriculture; that be was satisfied the mea kure under consideration would operate as a protec kidn to theta ;, and, he felt, and believed the country at large would . , fetil, that his Majesty' s. Mi n i s ters exercised a sound discretion . in the support ui tido' Bill. Mr. N. CALNERT w opposed . the, Bill. , J:'NE'rowr was convinced of the implol priety of tampering. with this subjeet. It . it is ere. intended' in-ad as a precaution against scarcity, the time at Which the, •11111 was to operate would be too late: By the agnatimi of the question th e Distill e ri e s sethad been sto work, and a - much greater quantity df corn had been used by heel) than would okherwi.te have been dohe in .tlte same period. He was per fe fly It would to a tail measure to the tillag .40'20: ' "After some ,further discussion,- in which . Mr. Maiming, Sir J. Hall, :Mr. Western, Lord W. • ii t ,owll . ,•anct several other Members; whose baNes we could na leap, pacticipatt, the On the diviskon the numbers wee, For the second reading . . . go ' Againt it . , The Bill was then rats a second titre, aid ordered to be committed. The Committee on the Dublin Police 81l was put off to Thursday next. ENGLISH LOCAL MILITIA BIIL. Lord CASTLEREAGH moved the Order a the Day for the further consideration Of the Reptrt on the Euglish Local Militia Bill ; after which tle- Bill wgi ordered to be re-committed, sn far as rated to tilt two. Clauses reserved on a former night On the Clause for requiring persons who claim esemptions in consequence of having paid the fine under the A6l, to sign ,a declaration that they had uat'paid r means of itty, insurance, or otherwise than % vim 'their own property, being read, I Mr. BaNets objeeted toothe Clause, on .he grotm" that it would make the Measure bear heavily ne w the lower classes, whilst it would operate ligilOY °n the higher classes. If personal service %veto e ll- forced iu every instance, the measure would net operate se unequally. But as substitution was not allowed, he thought that the lower classes Should be permitted to relieve th m eselves from the pressured. the fine by insurance, as otherwise the meastir ° would be odious in the Country. The SECRET A RY at WAR was surprised at the opposition made to this Clause, because it would go to the whole of the Bill. Tiiis Clause Was absolute , ly necessary to render the Bill operative; as, if''' . surance was allowed, the Bill would never talte'ef' feet. The burthen of the service could riot • b e , • heavy, • or' the ntintia6r of Volunteers who off ered to serve as Local Militia wailed not be . as great as the faat proved it'to be. Mr. WINDHA* thought. this Clause mosthghlYi objectionable, because it unposed a heavy pal b , a burthen .oti individuals at the lower class public service, without allowing . theta settle '• themseves ttainst 'it by insnrance. The loeilo r , si e ought either to enforce in eVery•i eistance person -1' service, or insurance should .be -allowed; becauie ia every case the lesser evil will be. preferred. In th e lower classes the fine will be a gre:ater than P e i r ' t sonal service, and they of course must serve, with the higher classes the fine will be t e6 lesser evil,. and they of course will pay the title, and nor submit to their personal service. The service W. be ruin to many persons in business, h w-0 ma! serve; and if:the service be ruin, the fine \%;lllCh for the tx to compel it:tuust equally be rtkinous. O. • ,11terefore, was given, as Was -stated by the N o ',; Lord, because either alternative must be rt)in.tet,l7, iedustrlouS:clesses, whom wteuld be tnos . t destt to proteet. Lord CASTLEREAGU stated, that thtno were otilY two ways of mitigating the severity ef'couscrieto, byballoc-rrnitigation 'by tine, or mitigation by atID stitution. He preferred the mitigation by flue, and : was not surprised at the opposition of the Righ t nourable Gentleman, because etc was most ani lll3 " in resisting any principle that was borro%ved tee m himself, the fine being the principle Of . his To, i gl . / ; n a g - Bill, which did nut aJmit of substitution: rril surance he looked upon as Injurious to the vnntta7' Service. In .t . he case of insurance Offices, t'!' endeavoured, as was oatnral, to obtain the men on the cheapest terms, and so far neer-. fered with the recruiting of the army. The sani° etre& was produced by the Insurance Clubs, and Ell' the assistance afforded by the parishes to individ uals, of a particular description. The insurance, if lowed in this instance, would have th e et e° °- e wiehdrawing the men from the service. The vice under .this Bill was different loom (he permanent Militia Establishment ; for wilt e l . persons . could not enter into the latter witho ut 6e ; sire:ition to all their domestic habitaand prosPebe. in life, the service under the former would ['net attended by that ruin which the Right Hon' ['Gall' stleman apprehended. The peratiss ton of insurap, would have the effea of throwing the Whole berth . 'n vithdra,,,k neig of service upon the poorer classes, all those whose means enabled them, by to cover them,elves from the personal service that ut:der. was cotiVinced that insurance was at ceniplett v j riance with ;the pritiipits of the measure, therefore he could not consent to allow it, ender no . ), circumstances to interfere with the operatioe of tio' Bill. worded, appeared to be too severe; le!cause,:; Mr. DAVIES GIDDY thought that the c hose, 11 ', would seem that in every iostimce, the nue to be the property of the eel paying" it, whe e l p he was of opinion that parents s hould 00 „ to Pay for their and .masters for the ir o gr e" t;,ces-or. servants. a a* Mr.I.IAI3INGTON spoke at some lengt h, an tilt) far as we could collect,. was suit adverse Clause. - . theywhO insured would. not do it to wittuloto Lora H. PETTY contended, that by insuranco themselves from the service of the Counq, 1)1 " r if enable them to tweet an optkm held out to tne'll Dhje the LegiSlature. He insisted also that kt middle class of. industrious persons that wonk" I . y' the prohibition of insurance, be ruined, eithed),.. the fitie, or by personal service, .to the ottw . struction of their.- business or , profession s. , e'. ti rely disapproved of the Clause. Lard CAM-EBB/WM acceded to the principle Og; gested by a GentTean (Mr. Giddy), 'and laid . , e m t/ doubt, that a provisio 'might be prepared to a be ero fathers to pay the tine fOr their sons , And !Pas! tur their-apprentices, or *ea yams, ‘vithout interte` in, with the general operation Of in t .; Mr. WINDUANI again insisted that this 103" would operAte lightly on the higher clasself 41 . 1 ! heal, tier a ' fete e poor. • divine After awords from Mr. WYNNE , a lion took place. When tlw numbers were-- - .For the Clawc, . Aviiist it ... - Majotity _ ,„ ..--9 , • -.. I The other Clauses were then agree d to, and ',tilt I-Touse having resumed, the Repor t *was t''"`,:rgt. up, when the Spealt.:r informed t he HoLl'". ',;',l ' the tl,ule Report was now belore-the }-IJose; "",„ that the Muestion would be that the Atueuthoc;l!;, of the Committee •oe agreed to, which, i'Aiss :.l / the affirmative. • . . I se, • • _ Lord cASTLERE.IGII .hen broug ht u p tile. C.t3tri requiring the Clefks of SibilivisiOns to 6ive ,:i i j•rity by bc;nd to the Deputy Lieutetunt, Or ''' • r