The Sun. — London, England, 1808-03-05 00:00:00

. . . This Day was published, in Two Von. Ilya . . price cos: Ott A JOURNEY throngh SPAIN and ITALY to ..0 3...'NMILES, and thence to SMYRNA and CON STANTINOPLE- comprising a Description nt the Prin cipal Places in that 'Route, and Observations on the present Ni.tural . and Political St tt of those Countries. By RUPERT SEMPLF., L°Oclri Printed For C. and K. Baldwin, New Bridge. street. t.,* We cannot conclude without again recommending Mr.. erriple'li Work to he attention of onr Readers, anal return ing our thinks for the pleasure we have receivers in accom panying Itint'on his Tuur. l , t will give us great satisfaition to mektt him on another occasion, and join his party.—Ediri. burAh Review, October. On the tath of March will be published. • xn thro. in Five Vols. elegantly printed nn a fine wove Rbyal Paper, price, in boards, Ten Guineas, T" NATURAt HISTORY of BRITISH F IS HFS, including geientific and General Descriptions of the most interesting Species, and an extensive Series.of accurately coloured Plates. Taken entirely from Original Drawings, purposely made. from the Specirnens in a recent State, and tor the Most part whilst living. by F.. DONOVAN, F.L.S. Author of the Natural Ilistories of British Bird!, Insces, Shells, dac, Printed for the Author. and fur F. C. and 1. Rivington, 6k6t. Paul's Church.yald sold also by I. liatchard, 190, * * This Work. consisting of Sixty Monthly Numbers, ineltdes Az* Plates of Iffitialt , Fishes. with appr o priate 1)e. scriptions, andsmay . be considered as one nt the toast splendid and useful Publications on the Natural History of this Coun- try that has liitherto been offered to the public attention. The SubjeCts from which the Drawings halm been exclusive. ly taken. were colletted progressively, with vets , considerable trouble and expense, and by great exertion have been olitaiu. eta for the moat part in a recent state, thereby atfonting the Artists employed an.oppurrunity of representing thug ; brig.' liantand perishable Beings In their true Colours, and gtowing with the vivid Flues of Lila.' N.B. This Work may .be purchased either Monthly in Numhers, at 3s. bd. each.",or half•yarly in Volumes, .11 al. 14. each in hoards. 4 Of the abOve.rnentioned Booksellers may be had, by the same Author, t. The Natural History of British Iriseps . ; cxplaiuing , them in their several States, with the periOds'ot their Trans. formations, their. Food, Economy, &c. The Whole illustrlt_ oil with coloured figures. In 12 Vols. Royal Bvo. price in boards 2. "f be Natural Ilistory of British hints ; with coloured Figures. In 5 Vols price in boards (el. 3. The Natural liistory.4 British Shelia ; with coloured Figures. In s Vols. price in bo4rils 71. iss. A SPLENDID, WORK, DES.CRIPTIVE OF MO. DERN LONDON. • This Day was pnblishert, In One large and elegant Quarto Volume, illustrated with Sixty Engravings, by the fi rst Artists, plain and coloured, price Three Guineas in boards', OD RN LONDON: Omiatitig .. bf it Brief lirstory•of the •Metroporis-of the British Empire, an , l ola lull and eircumstaritial Description of its PRES E N T STATE illustrated by beautiful ch . .raCteristic Engravings, representing FM the Places of : great public Resort, and .tha principal , This Work is the only existing Publication of suf fi cient Consequence and Author ity to illustrate to Foreigners .and Strangers the Wealth, Splendour"; Population, an.! tucl.4, of the largest City in the World. It ..: was o t hiisb c d expressly with that Design, audit is calculated to convey to the remotest Nations , :the•elearest Ideas relative to Loial!•n, and to preserve the Recollection of its most interysting Pea. tures to those Persons who are or have been - . familiar with them. Printed for Richard Phillips .No. 6, Bridge-street, Black, friars, and to be had of all Book'sellers and Dealers in Books.. Of whom may be had, by the same Editor, price 55: bound in red, The Pi4lure of .London, for 1868. MODE_I,9N_DQ_N SURGERY. This Day was published; in One .very large and.. closely printed Volume, (Mayo, illustrated with such l'lateo us arc essential pi the Subjea, price 12S. hiMidS, .L . intsT I,IIVES ...of the PRACTICE of SUR. j: GERy; being 4n Elementary Work for students, bud a colicic Boole of Retbrence for Praetitioncti.- li% . SANitl EL toopLit. Member of the Royal College or Surgeons; ; Fellow of the Medical Society of London; and Author of Critical Re- ticCtions on the Catarail. Prirved for Richrd Phillips, No: 6, Bridge-street, Black (rhos, And 601t1 by all Booksellers. • " • Of whom may also be hid, ' • t. A Treatise on the A Ira tOMy and Diseases of the E a r, with huge Nate*, drawn from real DisseCtions. gy C. Saunders, Demonstrator cif Anatomy at St. Thomas's Hos.= pita!, and Surgeon to the Dispensary for Diseases of the Eye and Ear. Folio, rl. ss. 2. The FAemerity. of Calvaniam, in Theory and Praaiee. By C. Fellow of the College of Stirgen n s, and I.o:Auter on that Science, in Soho-square. In 2 vole. gvo. with numerous Plates, price tl. as. in boards. ' 3. The Naval Surgeon, containing the entire Duties of Medical Men at, Sea. Fly W. Turnbull, Surgeon of the. Navy, &e. Sec. plates, 9*. hoards. • • 4. A Treatise on Vaecine Inoculation ;, to which is added, an Account of the Chicken Pox, the Swine Pox, and the Hives ; with an A ppendix, 'containing Letters froin Physi clans rind Surgeons et eminence respeaing the previa State of Vaccination in many Cities and principal TOWO3 of the United Kingdom. By ft , ,bert,Willan, .M.l). F.A.S. &a, 4to, with Coloured Engravings, plee t 5a.- inboards. . 5. Treatise on the Cantles, Progress, and. Cane of Con. eumption, By I ohn Reid, M.D. Physician to the Finsbury Disposary, 7s. boards, 6. A i l`reittiio on the Proceis employed by Nature in Sup. pressing the Flemorrliap from Divided and Punctured Atte. rice. By 1: F. 1). tones, M.D. In 1 vol. Bvo, with Millie. 'Mit Plates, nos. ad. boards, 7. A Praaical Inquiry into the Causes of Crmvulsive Asthma, Sec. By Robert 13ree, M.D. Fellow of the Rural College of Pha•sicians, &c. The Pourth Edition, consider. ably introvert and enlarged by ad.iitiunal Prai.tical Obser vations, price Ss. , This Day was published. I.Lo som ely prrnic t i it Two large Vols. ,Ito. price .Four • Guineas boards, ‘Aith ei l:,tea neatly engraved . nr`HE EDINBURGH MEDICAL and PHYSI CAL DICTIONARY, containing not °JOY an xpla. ration ot the Terms of ,Art used in AnatoinY. PhYsiology, Pathology, Therapeutics, Surgery, 111 , 1,vifery. Pharmacy, Iklatetia Molica, Botany, Chemistry, Natural IlivtOry, as etu r th,yeti in the present improved State 'ot' Xledical s c iemx, but also a copious Araeount of DIRC:i&C.S. and their Treat,incrit, agreeably to the.dodtincst a. Cullen, mum°, Hunter, -Vorityce, Gregory. Denman, Sanders, Home, and otbarrnodrn Te,44;lter* in Edinburgh and London. Tu which is addell, a copious Glossary ut obsolete Terms. • )Esy ROM; MORRIS, NI. P. IAMES KENDRICK, - -- • Surgeon, LS. and Others. !. With respett to the thitiortary helore us, the relative qualifications and tastes of the Anthers seem to have been very !nippily applied in the formation of two copious and i ntemst ., ittg voi9oles of Medical Science, We would recommend th , - ; S; volume. as not only a useful, bat a IluCeihaty append •age to the desk of every veinier of drugs throughout the Kingdom. We acknowlitrlge, however, that these voltottiy , exhibit many excellent specimens ot. analytical ; .01;4 they preserve proper, medium between mere noinenelature explanations and tedious histories of the dill rent subjects; th.a they are perspicuous, e u ne u le , tw o ry, a nd suffitiently , copious, although* copiousness, of *retro.; IA ens of the mart tare qua* . fieations ell m 0 ,4 mo d em Dittiotiaric, nt SCirt;Ce. Leery its door i tive 81goitiCati , )11, is neatly 'Mut occur .10y dr,m it up, and several of the ploatmaceutiCal sobjeCts are tltmorrwhieh proves the Authors to be very well a ,,, u ,„, te d with some oft, r hirers abstruse chemical pheipoovi-,. 'chit: Work, indeed, es the Authors observe hi then Pro:3I:1., is w h o lly mu d e fit,:aritt, ilive,ded of the aocietit .tktut the teiroprr4reois, which . conviry,no,distinel knowledge, it IttnimaLo all the late discoveria and most approved practice et the ablest physicians of the last thirty or torty years. in a Word, this Dittionary, illustrated by numerous well eXe• euted elates, 'mist tend to the temerity or the presumptuous empiric, by presenting him with a eenCtal Jill luminous view of that multifarious xCioliCO which he ig norantly dares to prores,so while it well serve as a faithful tablet et meinory to every regular pr.iditiolier, whit se great , ut_ pleumtte Lommitg in the speedy recovery or :Illevi3tion of , his patients . . gener al want of sucil a compothensiVe Work is presumptive roof of its utility."-7-Ariti-tacobin 'Review, Ott. !Sol. Printed tor Cradoek and ley.' Avontari4t4ine. Lonclon And hell and ilradfutc, Etlinburzh. IMPERIAL. P4RLI4MEA7I. HOUSE OF PEERS; 'ER IDAY, MARCH 4. The Marquis ,of Buckingham and Lord Selsey took the oaths and their seats. tticher v. Trail! and Others.—ln this appeal cause Sir Samtiel Romllly was heard for the Appellant. The farther hearing postponed to Monday. : Lord LAUDERDALE gave notice, that he would move on Monday for certain Communications, Co pies, or Extra4ts between this Court and Sweden, respecting the drders in Council. Some private Bilk were brought . up from the Commons ; which being read a first time, the House adjourned to Monday. HOUSE OF COMMONS. 'TWAY, MARCH-4. The SPAAKIIR announced to the House, that the . several East India Lists were laid on the table by the Clerk, pursuant to the theses of the ~. East India Ju dicature .Vll. • On the motion of the SECRETARY at %TAR, the third reading of the Mutiny Bill was put off to Mon day next. • 'rule Repo of the last Committee upon Expiring Laws was received, and Bills ordered pursuant to the ResiAntions of that Cornntittee.' The House again proceeded to a Committee upon Expiring Laws, and cure to other Resolutions, to which the House agreed, • Several Popers respeeting the condemnation of the L'Etrusea, concerning Sir Honw J'opharo, were laid on the table, and orcJe:red to be printed. Sir CHAltf..4s M. PO; et e notice of his in tention, next Tuesday, of submitting to the House a Motion respecting the better regulation of the Of fices of Greenwich Hospital. Mr. HUSEMON brought in a Bill, which was read a first time, for vesting le Exchequer Bills the residue of Cine;0001. remaining in the hands of the American Commissioners,. pursuant to the Aa of 43 Qco. a.. It was ordered•for a second reading on Monday. Tliceomtnittees of Supply and' Ways and Means were postponed to the same day ; as was the third 4.‘eadiniCor the Cotten Wool Exportation Bill, The House, in 'a Ciuminitlet; on Lord Lake's An nuity Bill, agreed to the same, and the Report was ordered to be received on Monday next. The Marine Mutiny Bslt was read a second time, • and ordered to be committed on Monday next. en the motion of Mr. HENRY SMITH, Accounts were ordered to be laid betiire the House, of Coals . carried coast ways. • On the Motion of Mr. TfIoStPSON, Accounts of Tontine Annuities were also ordered. TRANSPORT SERVICE. Mr. MARTIN asked whether Ole reports propa gated, which stated, that monies had been arbitrari ly' issued to the Transport Board, by order of the Se cretary of State, were true ? A, if he should be an swered in the affirmative, it was his intention to rnove•the House on the subject. • . All,•rinaKissosi answered, that he haliont.„ heard of any such report, nor did he know that any butch was in circulation, till he had just heard it front the Hon. Gentleman. But the truth of the fact is, that the Transport Board required no authority whatsoe ver fur the issue of money frUm the Secretary - of State. Mel an obsorvAion from Mr. MARTIN, and a reply from Mr. HUSKISSOW, the matter dropped. THE ARMY. Mr. WINDITAM called the attention of the House to a subject, which, in his mind, was 'of the very first magnitude, as it went, if carried into effett, the length of overturning the whole system of the army, which the wisdom of the House, after long and earnest discussions, and grnve and weighty de liberations, had -adopted., no later than. last year.— The House ,probably was not aware of this. , It was therefore necessary, that returns under that regula tion should .be laid on the table of the House, before the measure which Ministers had in contemplation was brought forward. The alteration was intended to be introduced into the Mutiny Ad. Here . the SPEAKER 'Merit:led,. ancl observed, that the,Right. Hoitunrable 'Gentleman was exceeding' the bounds prescribed, there being no motion before the House. • • Mr. WINDHAM Wag prOCe&diligia illS it * y the re plarity of lii 4 1:011(111C1, when lie wai again caUed to order by Nir. Sturge. Bourne. Thelit.cAttEiv observv(l, that it wag a luri of hiw most •irksowe duty to repeat the 'ad:nutrition he" bail More given. 'there, neither . was a Motion or notice of Motion before the House, and it was quite uncustomary to enlarge upon any topic, vv ith mit first, by the Courtesy. of debate, giving tintiee thereof. Mr. WINDHAM replied,: that a great military question was in u state uearly . readyfor 4tation.; that Papers to give information on that subject were urgently required that no time could be spared, to usual wait the forms of the Hoose ; that if : they did .wait, the objet would be lost altogether. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER remarked, 'that there certainly was no question betbre the House, nor did he see the necessity of the preface which the Might Hon. Gentleman used in bringing on the sub 'jecl as he did. He, however, was very eel lain that the Motion- would not be opposed, if ; the Parlia 'mentary cOurtesey, so very necessary, had' been adopted. ' Mr. WHITBREAD thought that the urgency of.the objett was apology sufficient for introducing it with out any previous notice. Mr. JOHNSTONE was surprised at the zeal .with 'whiCh it was endeavoured to urge the motion, which the Right Hum. Gentleman had in contemplatiou, to the House the. more especially when it would be admitted, that the subject was precisely the same this year which the House, and that Gentleman liinuelf, had agreed to last year. Mr. WlNonArd then said, " I'll make .the Mo ;ion simply, .and leave it, with the, House and the Noble Lord who has just entered (Lord Cast lereag h), whether it be such as they ought to entertain.' He then moved, " That there be laid . before the' }Rime Copies of the Rules and Regulations, for the better Ordering of the Army, - pursuant to an Aa of the last Session of Parliament, Lord C.ort.tarAn•initantly•roqe, end said the - ThotionWas perteCtly unobjeclienahle;. • Mr. NV;rum Am then said, if.. that - were:the .case, • it was probable the Noble Lord would of himself 'lay theOubefore the House in due time. • Lord CASTLEREAGH answered, that. he had no ob jCr`,liotl to place them in the possession of the „House as soon as possilije, and for that purpose they should be ready on AMetiday next. • The motion was agreed to' without any snore ob se:vations. sticOND LIVERPOOL PETITION. . ' Air, TIERN EY held in hiS hand a Petition signed by three most. reapectable merchants of Liverpool, against the Bill then in its progress Through that .1-louse, for confirming the Orders of Council: 7 —Th° Hon. Gentleman read it, and in substance it was of a tendency precisely similar to that, presented and rejected last night. . The CHANCELLOR of the ExciteGwea begged to know the ptirpoit of the prayer of it. - Mr. TIERNEY said, it prayed to be heard by Coun sel and evidence at their bar against the Bill which went to stinetion these Orders of Council. , The CHANCELLOR of the Excusausa declared that it was 'quite impossible, according to all Par liamentary usage, to allow the Petition to be receiv ed. The Bill of which it complained was clearly a Revenue Bill ; it was a . Bill which imposed certain duties, and it was never known in Parliamentary history, after a ttupply, was voted, to petition against a tneasure that went to furnish that supply. , Mr. TIEITNEY contended that it-was duly regular, and the neees's!ty of the case warranted him in pre senting it, Mr. Husmissori, on the other hand, denied, that a petition under like circumstances was ever re ceived. Sir JOHN ANSTRUTHER said, that for. the space of twenty-five years that he held a seat in Parlia ment, he never heard so much special pleading about the admission or rejeffion of a petition. The Right Honourable • Baronet entered into a long strain of argument in support of his assertion. Mr. S'it/EGEi . BOuRNE observed, that it was under the same predicament as the Petition of List night, and could not be received. If the Petitioners should present,a 'Petition against the Orders of Council, their application could not, and .would not; be re jeeted ;, but whilst they petitioned againa a Revenue Bill, it was impossible it. could be received without breaking down all the rules of Parliamentary Order prescribed to us by our ancestors. He illustrated this dodrine by adducing analogous cases. Mr. WHITEHEAD exclaimed, that Ministers last night rejetled a Petition on account of florin, and this night on account of substance, 'thereby giving- the House and. the Public. to' understand, that neither in. substance or .fiirin would .they receive , one against their favoinite Orders of Council'.. The CHANCELLOR of the ExeuititrEtt replied, that Ministers would not objet to the Petition against t he principle of the Orders of COuncii, though, they had great objeaions to adtiiit one against this . Bill. , Here the Right Hon. Gentleman recapitulated, the reasons before stated •so.forcibly by himself and others, concluding with the assurance, that if the Right Hon. Gentleman should on Monday next pre sent such a Petition as he suggested, it should nur.. 4 e him-or to by hl - or his friends. Mr. EAP, Mr. W. SMITH, Mr. Alderman COMBS, and Dr..LAWBENCE spoke. . The Debate was continued at. very great length, and the 'proliriety of 'receiving the Petition was sup ported by Dr. LAWRENCE, , Mr.' ADAM, 111 r. EDEN, and Sir A. PIGOTT, on the ground that one part of the Petition, at least, referred to the Orders in Coun cil.. On Atte other hand, the Someyrou GENERAL contended that the Petition was directed against the Money Bill now pending before the House, and was equally .contrary to the usages.of the House as that which ba.l been rejected yesterday. Mr. BA :VIC es recommended to the Right Hon. Gentleman who presented the Petition to withdraw it for the present; and recommended it to be drawn up in such a shape as might remove the abjection which had been made to it in point at form, in which case the Petition might be received on Monday. • Mr. VERNEY declared, however, that no power on earth should induce him to withdraw the Petition as.it then stood; nor would he compromise the matter by listening to the suggestions of a Right Hun. Gentleman (the Chancellor of the Excheqtter), reiterated also by the last Hon: Speaker, as to what was the, proper form which the Petition should sumo. It wuu!d be evident to every man of com mon 'sense in.the country, who shouldjead the Pe tition, that it Wqts setettantially direded against the Orders in Council, and it required all the special pleading and ingenuity of the Learned Gentlem in on the other side to give any colour to the idea, that it was a Petition; of such a.forin as 'made its, recep- . tiara incompatible with the Orders of the House. aneral RLETON ro , e to'say a' few woe& in explanation of the vote which he should give this night. Hu had voted for, the Petitiodlast night, as freseiited by his Hon. Colleague (Gen. Gascoyne). But he thought the Petition presented to-night, as coming through the hands of a Right Honourable Gentleman (Mr. Tierney), who was certainly a leading Member of the Opposition, assumed some what of 'a party 'aspe&, and on that ground he should vole against it. 'He could assure the House that the great majority of the people of Liverpool were zealously-attached to the Constitution in all its branches, and were happy to witness thd vigorous. and decisive measures of the present Ministry, par ticnlarly when contrasted with the want of vigour and energy in their predecessors, , Mr. VERNEY could assure the. Hon. General, that, the only reason why an Hon. Member (Gene ral Gascoyne) .had not preseMed the Petition to night was indisposition, and that he had put it into Iris hands for the purpose of being submitted to the House. After a few words from Mr. SIMEON., who op poSed receiving the Petition, and from Lord STAN LEY, wlso supported it, the House dicided; when there appeared— ' A4ainst the Petition being received . lit tor it mo am -- . • 57 Majority --- 54 puiing the division Mr. PONSOiIIIY addressed the Members in_the Lobby, requestinga lull attendance on Tueiday, when the Mutiny Bill would be dis cussed, ,as there was a Clause in that Bill which in etre& did away the whole military systeM introduced by his Right Hon. Fe:encl (Mr. Windham), and whiel? had received the sanction of Parliarucutj • REAtiItJG EXTRKCTSFAOM OFFICIAL PAPERS. j Air. ADAM rose to make his mot i o n, which stood on Order.. He drew, the - atttution o the - House to the conduit of the Right Hon. Secretary (Mt% Cannitig), who had on the s4atid Bth of Fe bruary last been guilty of a violation of coostitu- tional principles and parliamentary proceedings. He hoped those days would 114 the last 'in which the: House would have to witness such conduct. Having stated the secrecy adopted ,in Parliament With respell to official documents on former occa-• sions, he complained that Extraas - of Dispatches • had been read in .that House by Mr. Secretary •Can• ning without the consent of Parliament, or by order .of his .Majesty. This was the first time his Ma" jesty's Ministers had read Extraas from Letters sent from Foreign Miniiters abroad without atitito thy, and they had transgressed the Orders and prin ciples sanaiened by Parliament. On the 2d of Fe bruary, a Right Honourable Member of this House put a Motion for. Addresses to his Majesty, which became the subject ofsdiscussion. Certain Papers were then called for relative to Deninark. The Papers contained a Letter from Mr. Garlicke.tolord Howick in 1806. This Letter would have 'Audi: eated several characters vilified, but on the Bth of February -its produaion was rejetiod. On the d6ths during a motion for Papers, this very Letter was p roduced a o . tr ib it e h l w ia udi pligrint i t by the Right' Hon. Secretary, and part ial xtraas read from it, previously rejected, any Member:of that H ouse , he might, with leave of the House, read the libel, and have it laid on the •, s aised ha ai d gt= .rionsly laid on the 'table,. was contrary .table;; but to do any a& without' he document pr e- and subver• sive to the establi s h e d ru les . of the business of P ars liament. He had di scove red severa l instances its the Parliamentary Annals to prove that the cond'ia of the Right lion. Secretary had been a violati on ' bf Parliamentary form. •I n Noveniber, 1767. a" &P. cussion took place iu the House between Lead , Grenville and Mr. Dyson. . The latter contended, that all public documents ought_ to be laid en the table, and. when Lord Grenville Made several °bier• vations in opposition, Mr. Fox declared that it W 35 unpatliamentary to speak from documents not pro perly laid before the House. The Honourable and Learned Gentleman then instanced various. simylet . cases in both Houses . - P a rli an ieiit; He then eat tended, , that the Right °Hon. SecrelAry had exr ceeded the limits 'prescribed by his official situation. It was a most' dangerous thing, he said, when Mi nisters Undertook to disclose the secrets of GoVern merit without the autholiti of the King. 1.4e-thenmoved a Resolution to the following etleta.: — " Re solved, That it appears to this House that one of the Members did read, on his own authority, partial ExtraCti from dispatches received from Ministers at ,Foroin Courts, and other documents, which had not been laid before the House by command of his Majesty, such conduct not being according- to the usages . of Parliament, and the ancient &adieu iu the discussions of that House, Bcc." The Resolution being put, Mr. Secretary C/ INNING rose and said, Iron' the' formidable commencement of the Honourable and Learned Gentleman's motion he ex pt some event to be brought to light that would haee-enang. ed, in his opinion, the nature of that condtat'which in his own estimation he still considered blamelesi. If the speech of the Honourable and Learned Gen tleman had produced satisfaCtion to any Membersof that House; he himself felt considerable satiafaCtiona because it. had thrown from his mind a weight o f anxiety. The Hon. Gentleman had said the lean upon that part of his argument which required the most , he alluded to official misconduCte , In all the instances quoted by the Hon. Gentleman, the par ties who complained of a breach of duty when Pa` pens were read without any message from his Ma' jesty, objeaed at the time to those who attempted to reed such Papers. When the Hon, and Logn 44 Member spoke of Mr. Fox, he wished he had role lowed the example of that great man, who would have interrupted any' improper, statement in that . House at the moment such statement was made , without coming a month after with a motion on the subjea, as the Hon. Member had.done.-rMrt Seems tary Canning then answered all the-,observations made by the Mover of the Rosolutions, in a cleat and satisfaaory manner. He particularly a lluded the Resolution which charged him with slatin g transaQions at Foreign Courts, and wished to kno w, ' -whether he was to understand', from We use of the term transaaioes, that it was the intention of the Hon. Member to endeavour to criminate hirn , ed the ground of his having made any improper disclo sures. The Hon. Gentleman had .exclairneds " 0 tempora, 0 horn!" at occurrences altoget her ' his attention. The dispatches to Lora Howick were not withheld on. the 3d and Bth of • Feb. as the Hon. Member had described. Under all the circumstances of the motion, be could not avoid saying, that whatever . objet tioris 'might' made' to his coodua, in a constitutional senaes-ofo o ' any other ground, the Resolutions moved b y thP Hon. Gentleman could answer:na possible g ood, as . they merely expressed personal enmity., The Hon. . Secretary concluded Ida speech with contending, `that his conduct, if irregular, was not without piece- dent ' • and that a necessary discretion ha d at all times been left with Ministers to, communicate informa tion to the House, without the form of his MajestY's Message, which was quite a distinct subject frons,the net then under consideration. Mr. WINDHAM called upon the House to est• ercise their recollettion, and consider whether speech of the Right 'Hon.' Secretary had shewo a sufficient justification of his conduct, or a sutticien t reason why the proposed motion of his .I.earttea Friend shoui.t-not be agreed to by the House..: Hi s speech, instead of defending. the princiPle'Whereo rt he read the extraas complained of, only disputed the authorities quoted. He recollected the case wherein Lord HoWick was said to have read detach• ed extraas from public dispatches; but it that were the ilia, it surely was not a good precedent, and it bec.nuetiot that House to sanaiun it with 'their or probation. Was the praCtice to be considered a legitimate practice or not ? If it were, there might perhaps be • many precedents, but if' Cl ot ' it were , The pradtice lis l e been it became that House to apt such a Resolution e-, would prevent their recurrence '!'he frequentlycensured, but never ptr,:icly sa c " tinned in that House,' and he conceive d the ab,enoc of all authority the best authority th at no snclUroc.