The Sun. — London, England, 1810-11-15 00:00:00

P-W l '` **`"l'ff t.. 4 TV REPORT. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov !4. In an asp; cal cause from Yorkshire, wherein cer tain persons had thought 'lit, of their own accord and authority, to levy a ci)arge of I Ss:4d. upon' constables every ear, hip Lordship declared it'to be <it of the mu:A hatettied. ac-ts of intolerance he' 1 1 7,1 t-ver heard of, t.lai any Man, • or, set of 'then,- sh.)111(.1. dare to irw:ose it tax upon the people,. and. usurp all that the I..,.:ziilature could dO! ART?CLES OF TIM PEACE. Mrs. Doherty die ‘vite of a Mr 4 iklugh Doherty, applJared in Court and exhibited articles of the peace against her said husband. -It appeared that they were married about eight years, and that outing the most of that period site experienced a great varitqf of iil treatment from him, that s he had therefore exhibited articles of the peace against him, and 'he was bound to keep peace for one _year, 'that being confined for debt in the prison of the Kit:g - 's Bench, as soon as be had obtained his liberty, reg , rdlessof her fOr fuer complaint, rand the articles so exhibited against ,he repaired to the house wlr.'re she had re tired to avoid his ungovernable temper, and there he Idund her, and broke.. into it, and would have proceeded to ads of desperation and violence, but for th , Interference of some , persons whereby Abe was then saved' froth his fury; ,but that ,he peated his ViittS, atai threatened death to any whO would presume tn - interrupt him. The articles went on to, state , reat ads of rage and violence up to the iniddleot 6:tocer last, tAhen; to save . herselltrem imminent peril; she waS obliged to seek rouge in her father's mansion in 1110 county of Worcester. The articles being so read; they were, on the me- tion of the Attbrney General, ordertd to be filed. MANDAMUS. Mr. WAttrtEN moved Inn- a Writ of Mandamus, diroOted to t Bishop of Lo,don, commanding him that lie should grapt a lice se to the Rev,Mr. Povah, to hold the situation of Friday Lecturer,"ai St. E a rtholcim6w's, Royal Exchange. Mr. Povah was elected to this place, and approved of by the for ; but 'on Tresenting-hwkielt to the Bishop for the cprpose of plicnring the license, be was told that his Lbidsitip would= not-grant the licenSe lcicause he • w . as•-.Otily in .Deacon's orders. Ti'is obstacle, bowevei - , - was - soon'"overcuine, - is the Rev. G ent l e _ inanwn 'himself ordained in Pilest's order s bi t h e BiThop'of§ouer and T..yrati. lie then pres...nite him self a sec'und . tirne to the. Bish.lp, but hew,-i% ;;g a l l tefused, the hicri that lie heard, his cioartnr was Tot • oribox, tOr he had .beld tenets, and preached in - terms adverse t e received pi ocipie in CarisrtatThy — ot Infant :Pitts Mr. Po‘•ati -mostiboletnriy assured his. LOrd ship• was untrue, to: that •he had ever by his exam ple, and by his in,iitLAion, inculcate:'. • the doctri ne And :verity' of ;infant b.iptistu. Aker some- 'dif ficulty, and some lapse ol time, a third reason 4 - aq announced by ht .withhoiding the license, and. was siguitie,:, in an answer sent itJ ' Povah's Solicitor by . the •I.;,liop's Secretary, name.lY ; that his did 'not think him qualitied.7—Mr. Warren' .;ere contended, that the 3,21 was mandatory, on the Bishop, unless he could support some spec.fic reason, or sonic cause 'w4 the applicant was roused a license. • fic.ar . gthd, that: it ":+squite contrary to the spirit of our and constitution to condemn any man tan heard, and he maintained that it was but just that the Bishop should mme the' person . who had so,- gesutd • that he was unqualified,. that : Mr. Povari thight be . atl'orded theoppqrtunity be could).(2l removing the accusation. At all events, he urged that . me, - Pciliall was entith.d to their Lordships' jus r fora rule 11isi, which world at ford the• Bishop an ,opporiunify of ,rnote. : spe.mcally .accounting for 14,1e,,tetusal. . • • Lord tu..st , ipotpuoti,r after some observations respetaing the discretionary power which he thought was,.vesicu nithehopby the At, said he was per= suaded that the best nu,de for the Court at present to e ursUe would be, (it\ account .of the.- delicicy of .the,subject, and the situation of the parties al tpguth r, that the Court should take so me littl e - • time,to consider the matter. In the mean while the or the ruse is suspended. . . NDGMENT: CROPLEY U. CAVE, POND, AgD PEACOCK. The deferktittotF,- . Tlionta4 Cave; Joseph Pond, and AnPigieijPeActittk,'haci" been foot - RI guilty of a agsatilt cfpaa , E4werci Cro iejf; and were ti,is -day .btonglit lip :Ad (receive the jticlgtnent 'of the `Court. action !had - been • rertioved . by the 'pxo seeutrir,''CrOpley; frctu the `treat Sessions i i the Islo•of . Ely,' to , tire ebni-cor Bench. • -• Mr. Justice B'AtiLEY-lizati oqer the minutes of the 'trial, by which it appears tWt the paTti•:s 11M : fret together at the - Three Bflek Birds publicihotise it, Ely, where they 'got intoxicated; arid the assault was committedr-sj ?Ir. Serjeant S2LLON put in several affidavits, in mitigation of ' - fittnialrient.' From' therm it a ..- pearifid,, that the defendants had been drinking fi - om two o'clock in the', dly till about eleven 'at night ; -that Cropley had come in,' and irritated the defen dants, which caused the assault to - be :committed. One ,of the affidavi'ts was that of a inedieal man, who had seen Cropley the morning after the affray, u Hell stated, that the blood observable on the gilt:eta of Crituley's bed did not arise from any blows be had ieceiv'a, but was occasioned by deponent's having bled him,. in consequence of his appearing Ti.ry feverish. Mr. Belea; on the part of the prosecutor, put in 4everal counter-affidavit's. That of the Iproseentor; it:ited that the partieSAvere not intoxicated: pfd li'LLEssotitouen—" This is an over-charged: business. It is clear that these persons must Ldve been in a state of intoxication, as it is sworn they had been drinkingfroin two o'clock till eleven; and,' hour before that time," they had been very riot Goa, One .of the iwitnesses also deposes; that the blood which was.found on the sheets did not arise blows,but from, the use of the lancet." Mr. BEST--"' We have the affidavit of .thy Lod- / n, / . , • lord of the hous'tYtviii - on stales that il,e. not intoxicated." Loid'ELLE::Boabuon : z-:“"He'shonl - d 'gt) ti I'ttle farther, and swear that-rum and bandy do not pos -sess intoxicating qualities." Mr. Sefjeatit — Siiii - oN shortly - addressed - the Court in behalf of the - defendants. He Rartictilatly-ad verted to the - vniclictive spirit which actuated the prrsecutor,' in 'rejeding every - tiler of compromise, and moving the business front the Ely Sessions to the Court of King's Bench. Lord Etf.,EN,aono . v6a.---L" Since the afi - 1%.:y y' u hare don every itiTng thinglO • - set - ,:yOurselyes and 'he has ex.erted Filmset rto'do every thing wrong." Nr. RENT—" The l Prosecutorcan deny upon oath, that any attempt at compromise was crude." Lind ELLEIIMROUGt-1--"Atier what he has sworn relative to the sobriety of the parties, Ave will not.put him to the inconvenience . 04 'swearing any thing further." AIr..BEST—" When'one of'the party was spoken to about tie business nett morning,' (when, it . he had been intoxicated 'overnight, it is fo be'suppthicd have been •in -a stEte•of - sobriety), so tar oin expressing regra at what he had done, be aid he was grieved that he had not inflicted greJter jury on the pro4er,utor," • Lord:ELLENEottouctt—" We do riot tnoW for they hats got sober next morning after this grievous fit 'of ifitoxication. It 'Would appear ITin your statement, that they are - scrinis6 when lit'unk, and semi-tartarians when shber. Mr. Justice 'GRosE, atter an appropriate ackl . resi, pronounced the judgment of the Court on'thesde feadants ; which was, that Cave and Peacock shOuld each pay pay a fine of QOI. to the King ; and Pond; who did not appear to have taketn'so ak`live a part in tite business, the sum of 51.; • which fines were iM. tntdiately paid, and the 1 / 4 defendatits di,chargeti•l iika-1 CURT OF IUbItATURE, DuBLIR, Nov. 9 E RIGHT 110 N. ELIZA ';'.;tORCINA, BARONEr.S CURRY, APPELLANT; Tll4 RIGHT ZION. VAI . ENrrNE BROWNE D 'LORD BARON CL9NCURRY, RESPONDENT, lencEsDLL.ec,yrs-Sir W, SMITH, Barr.. Mr. Justice osgoRNE ; Mr.fttstice FLETCHER ; EDWARD WESTRY ; and TimmA4 ELL s, Estirs. This cause was brought by the appellant, upon a dottole appeal---one from an alleged grievance; and another from the final Sentence of the,Consis torial COurt of the Dioeese of which, ad, judged the respondent entitled fo'a divorce and se paration fro.. appellant (on ,aCcount of the clear and tssrablished adultery of appellant) from bed, and board. The libel in thisc,atie was exhibited by the re-. spondent on the 17;1) (14 Of June, 1808, and con tains the following' taas,:— It stated the matriage•of the respondent and ap pellant;pccordingto law, in the year ,1803---their cohabitation,,and the issue of th e ir riage—the uniform gOod and exempl.);.y coiiduCt of the appel hint; until their arrival iii this kingdom—ar'id subse quent introdtithion of Sir John Benner Piers - to' op rt•ildnt, in the year tBO6-the manner and.time of the introduCtion 7 -and a. criminal act of adultery committed by appellant on "tire Bth day of April, at Long, the resicknee of respondent, and in the ab sence 'of reTondent—the appellant's arrival and stay in Dublin, during the months of Aprd and Mar—the frequent visits-of Sir John Piers to ap pellant, during the occasional and unavoidable ab sence of respondent—appellant's continual corre 'Spondence, by letters and notes, with Sir John Bennet Piers, and his itritn..diate visits to her in con sequence of suet letters and notes, during the ab "pence of reSpondent- . --Sir John Bennet Piers being constantly in private With appellant, and for several hours at 'a time, in th e , drawing-room, with the doors closed and`bolted, and the positive orders of appellant not to - adinit company--:-appellant and Sir John Piers being surprised 'in 'the drawing-room in a most indecent situation, and other Clear and dis 7 tinet instances Of leer" guilt—the frequent disorder of her dress--continued acts of the 'most indecent libertiei taken by Sir Sohn Bennet PierS, and per mitted by appellant—her great and visible grief at.. -leaving Dublin for Lyons, and' parting w;th Sir Sir Jotin Bennet Pyers—Sir John Bennet Piers's subsequent visit at Lyons —appellant's refusal to walk with respondent and his company, and mmediately afterwards being seen bylespondent, walking with Sir John Bt-mner Piers in a retired part of the demesne, and , hanging on his arm . in a most familiar manner, the first cause of respondent's sus picion---4espondent's earliest' communication 'with appellant on the subject, and her •ininnediate, free, and voluntary confession'et her' crimeapPellant's delivery to the respondent of the picture of Sir John Bennet Piers,• a locket set with his_ hair, the letters of Sir John Be.nnet Piers, and other clear proofs of her crime--appellant's removal to England,' and her continued: acknowledgment of her crime, freely and volunt-arily mentioned and confessed, and in its con sequences severely ; lamented in appellant's letters, written from thence to respondent, and to other friends;of respondent and of appellant. Issue being joined on this pleading, and no-ex ception taken thereto, respondent proceeded to the examination .of witnesses, and other evidences, in support of his.libel,.and proceeded therein nearly to 4 close, when the 4ppellant, on the Bth day of June, !, sog, exhibited a pleading in this came, called a matter contrary and defensive.. Li this pleading appellant alleged, that respon &tit had been perfe6tly apprised and conesant of ;tie profs gate conduct of Sir \ J. B. Piers, and ,parti cularly with resped to married women, betote his incroduaion to the appellant ; and that with such knirwledge."'ot his character, 110 had introduced him to appellam, and indirectly attempted to refute the charges of her crime, asalleged and afterwards prov ed by respondent ; and sought to do away the effect of her crime aid her confession, by an allegation that it that! been obtai;,ed . by a - pl'omise of forgive.' ness, and that her crime had been forgiven, by rea-, son of responttent'S having pertnittA bear to remain at his..bouse until a,,out the .1 t h day of June, when site, went to Locldon, under the - care of Cul. ; L UNDO I' rititud by RiCh.-:.A: !) 1 - 1.1 'rat 16. Qt No. 4, Maztlett.cotet, b'ow-strect j an9l Vrtil 114. Svs:Corsicz-, No, ; iiisanci s . *hem ildvertisemmis, Orders for t, , . . ati'd an - aliegltiou cf the , - -...pcu.L.ot having- liecd connection witl► her, subsequent tO his knowlOoe Moil" het` coniesiiion of her • The Personal answer of respondent Nvas requited to this Oeading . . •In this answer respondent, on his oath, denied the trud,j of the. allegations of this pleading, and swore that, appellant's contessi •tz of her crone was free, feel:, and volutviry. _ A second plea&ng was exhibited on the part ol the appellant, oil Ike 241 h day of Nowetniw, 1809; of nearly tIA; same. import of the first pleding ; and .on respondent's personal answer being re quired thertO, it . was immediately and fully -an swered:. . The appellant 'produced and examined some wit-, nes,iis to certain articles of her pleadings, but in no wise to the proof or establishment of her defensive mater, or a., y thing connected theiiwitit or ;, , leading thereto; and iibiication. having pasted in toe cayse, the satlle came . to be heard the 1 tth day of May lasi. On the hearing of the cause, the respondent esta bltshed by distinct, positive . ,_and legal evidence, the several fads of adulterous intercLurse, and evidence thereof, as "allege'd tits libel and appeariug on the tianstniss of the pleadings, proceedings add proofs its this cause; -and then offered in evidence the letters Of the appellant, which vt eie proved in this'cause, as continuator-5r evidence of the untie, and distinct proof of a ti6e . . and voluntary confession.' On the pert Of the appellant an objeelion was taken to their 2dmissaitlity, on the ground that such evidence', as being a sole confeSion, was against law, and a g ai n St t h e C anons of the Chtitch, as by taw establi,bed. On:the parrot - the respondent it was argued, that the 'evidence wks admissible that it was not a sole Corrfes,i(;n, iirt a confe.ssiOn shewn as a coofirmatory vr subsidiary t..;•?60f, not in itself 'relied on As single evidence of her guilt, blit eolitiraied and corroborat ed by the otter i . r Drools 'in This cause. On these grounds the Court 'ov,erruled the objec tion and - uhder•the tircuinstinces 'of this • ease; as prot ed, admitted the at:Tenant's -confession, in her own hand-writing, to be admisßible evidence. _Tilly, the ProCtor of the appell : nt, dissenting, unclz.r a _pre text of appealing: The letters Ot the appellant '(as-now appearing on the :ransmiss) were rend; and the case was then dos ! ed on the part of the respondent. On the next Court day an appeal in Writing from the - alleged grievance was eoaibited on the part of the appellant; and the'lludie, in the C'ourt below, having required the appellant tb proceed'in. the cause and on b.. 17 I delence the appellant .declined, statiog her case, as founded 'On the ,llegation of the plead- . ings'or evi4nVestyrodnted. to . the same, or,any other ground of defence, against the case stated and esta blkhed in emidenee on the, p.art, ,of the respondent ; and theregpOn the Jude pronounced hiesentenee in this cause itr favour of teipondent, and adjud g ed him entieled.Jo, a sentence of divOrce and separation from appellant., on a,ccount of t heclear.4o: establish 'ed adultery of'appenaut, from tied and, board, until 'they rkonciled; ThAz At' , 'hbishop of D•ablin ing •previouslyiconsented•theret6; and Skciit, the respondent's Pruaot, ha,v in g: c:i.laipi,t,ed • the,. usual bond with the applobalion and consent aforesaid, signed his sentence Accoedi t ngly on the 15th.day of Nay, last—the appellant protcsting at thd ael, and .appealing from tlie•sentence. POLICE. • GUil..DHALL—Yesferday a genteel looking young man, , dressed as a‘petty .ollicer, in the navy, was charged before the silting Alderman, on suspicion "Of stealing a portmanteau trunk, the prorerty of Mr. Grant ; a navy agent,' who was residing at the Belle Sauvage Inn, Ludgate-hill. It appeared- by the evi dence of a wailer at Peele's Colfee-house, Fleet street, that the priconer, on Friday evening last, came in a great hurry and enquired if he could be accommodated h a bed . ; the waiter toOk a pot t nianteau trunk, and a s!clall ,bundle tied op in a handkerchief from the prisoner ; and conducted Irirn up stairs; 'the prisoner said he had lost the key of his trunk, and requested a chissel to break it opt'n; the waiter furnished him. with-an instrument for ,the purpgse. The prisoner came down soon after- Wards kith two bundles, and said he .should return in a few minutes, but did not return that night.. Ort searching the room, it appears the conients of the trunk' had been taken mit, except a few papers. The next morning the waiter seeing an advertisea'.ent in the papers, deAzihing the trunk and its contents, and ollering a 'reward' for the rectiverr of it, imme diately gave information at the Belle Sauvage, when the trunk and the papers were delivered to Mr. Grant; who having recovered the most material part of his property, was obliged to leave London for Port stnot t Un Tuesdey evening .the prisoner again went to Pede's coffee-house, and !in . a .great.'hurry said he wanted .to get- at bis.trunk ; but being informed it had been delivered 10.,Mr. Grant, he made a trifling excuse, and prtcipitately. left the coffee-house, he was pursued by two of the waiters, and with great difficulty secured. • A-porter from the Belle Sauvage stated, that on Friday,evening be saw a person of the appearance of ihe prisoner go. put of the - yard .with a t r u n k an d bundle and it appeared the trunk had, been stolen horn' Mr. G.'s steeping room. The porter could not identifY the prisoner,but the wait e r swore positively to his person. 'Mr. G. being still detained at Ports mouth, the pris o ner was c6turhitted for"Nrther ex- amination on Monday next. The priSoner stated that - he Was Captaiio's clerk of ilie Oilis,ju.lt arrived frorn Opott0; but in the scuf tie with the waiters he bad list bi poCLA-boOk, wteich contained -his Certificate. MUUDER. , WORS.I;II.P 7 STREET.—An investigation took place yes!erday, at this office, relative to the supposed murder of Mr. ThOnial Clarke, a respeataulei auc tiOtteet and apptaigt'!r,' residing in Old-street. By the examination of the several witnesses, it a, , peared that the deceased Was a"collector of, the assessed - taxes, &c. in the parish of §t. Luke, Mid- ished . by WILLIAM ARMIC: E R SC itiPP, SOUtik MO;to4 4e Paper, Cittsrs for (post-paid), npli dlrctx, itt 34 . 7 Lt!e::.!'c i. :,(..stliti,Tr.ne..1. •i t appenre 4 l oti Nionday htor i° l( j ; !y houie, to IC t , 1;11 , .16 ordered, and dir r (iccl one of })ii I:ien to :Ittetid on Will at 7;,)?ciock th next itlip'util t t. 110;• ' evcri ' did not return. • His hat cut, in two places, and one of his sl ev bittons h:lve b , en f()Lll7d n ear a ciaV Min in Flox")r) , fields, and krithin: Sit Ot . d r a id, a ,, f i : part coac. and Iva ist eo , ft i;) h, r r , t t same fields. It is ,s!ppoE,:!,l that be bad been dered, r.nd from hi.? .1)10 , : . n .•J his wile -;rl4 he was going t o take ‘lit itiventory : it tne 'Eingsland : road, which cannot hft •f outic i out, if cony,•etured that he had heat c,4ieled tit some 1 !": ' tended busine ss , an d that his Ll,3,4sinntion k•va meditated. He - fregnently carried abobt • perty to a large amount—The body ; howeVer; itv hating been dticovered, nor any of toe art t 6 3' „ ed to any persons, the ... ^- lagistriites a. .ems 1113 farther examination until the in.orinat:• o can be ob:ained. • Bow. STR EET.777On Tuesday 'Charles Hemir"'" brought to this office, charged w i t h . robbing.' .I°l'3 • Robinson, fish -salesin.-in; of St. Mary'S Hill, Thanic 3. street, of his watch, chain; and seals, It appeared t h at the 'prosecutor d A sailor (who m h e h a d known oitie yea's ) . on Friday se'nnight, to Sometstt house, to receive some Ivo.* ney, where they met anoffivr sailor who kHew tl l el l4 and who had-just received 5 21. in , 'inquired of them where he could get• cash Tor ti lts notes, as he s u pp ose d they would not pAss in ir e " land, where he wanted to send them to ins sister they took-him to an Age,:t of he nanteof in Drury-lane, who accommodated him with so.r* le cash. They' then went to apnblic-house togeOeirf and drank freely; whilo - they Were in the ...boos* two men ask e d him to•look , at his wale!), ;Diehl coMphed with, an d as he was. leaving [hely/ 1192) , they forcibly took it lioin togesher wiin a key; two gold and a goid•chain, and 'b e l t made then eseave iii, • then. The pro , ie:utor so noiCh affected by,, the liquor he had drank, 1133 he has net ace', abletoissi.:ert.,in the h otie in w"i cs ~, he was robb e d. On t h e evening ri t e to: 10 ‘v il l day, the pe os erwor, • acc op hy frie' the sailor, we n t to a b otLe of resort for sa'ln r " 4 . in hopes o f h ear i ng of his watch, Sire. witen,• fr their great siirprii•ft.; th•-y heard that the other sail had been robbed o f 'the is hole of Ids 521. that . the prosecutor was suspected' of being ". robber. Adkins, the 801..-•sirLet, officer, was , consequence sent 'for, and he totly tor the offence.= —After he had been iu c `"; tody some tune, and •a n investigation'liad tal‘ o i l place, he was disctiareed. On an application a t r ; tree : number of pa nbiok e rs, me Gaintirtdge produced a watch, which'b h ead taken in pieOge-1 the evening of the day on which the robbery place ; which the prosecutor identified: to be 1 , property, but t h e .c h a i n and seals had been Lnbe-', off; the gold key remained. The pawnbroker ' e ; lained the watch, and promised to stop theli . t 44° -i who c,line to red eem i t. i n a few days aiiel,,4ll prisoner called at the shop to tike it out - When' the pawnbioker detained him. • • 'I The account th e p r i sone r g ays of his po•;sess' of the. watch was, that he bought the duplicate ofr man on the M on d ay mot fling after the robbery, t the pawnbroker swore positively to the pri•ioner•Of ir ing the man who pa wn6d .the watch on 'the Dig' . of the robbery. The prisoner,•Heury, was committed for trim' •, . • PA ItT Ar ERS 11 IPS D ISSOLVE W. Total and Yuppie, Kingston- upon-Hull, grocers. R. Mules, S. B arnett, and VVorthingtvn, St,aurpq r " • Worcestershire, earners., I. Fbster and 'l. Foster, Selby, Yorkshire, mr4chants' 'l'. Layton and W. Procior, Caliteriaury, linen—drapers. • MAialiell, Sen. and Mallalieu, jun. tviitncrinater,t re isr dealers. WilliamsJ. and 1-l- Mountlord i Worcester, pastry.todO• I. Johnson and louts, l(aisington, bricit-makc(s.• Builow-and C. BroWll, - Little Bolton, Lar,c , uslitre, makers. • Fletther and . G. Davis. Chriitchurch, Surrey. 101 J. Thoinfon and W. Merryweuther, Lancashire, mani.iaeturers. I..l.uncier and W. Boglo, Itintrtinghlin, C Cooper and F . 1)0 ,, esc , -tt Urc;at St. kl e l en ' s Coal=r ll s? chants. 1,10;" W, Kemp,.Cavenagh, and W. Ilro.wne, v 41 17. W . Love, K. move, and C. rbinison, f brick-makers. -i N. Gould, Gold, G. Gould, an d otzr J. Peach, Manclt me ratan G. Waymouth Waytrtoutlr, Exeter, merchants. I. Ord and , Gordon, Upper Tharfie3-street, R. Prince, 13. Prince, J. D. Prince, R. Hoskins, on" Hand - , GartiSon, Derbyshire,. calico-printers, , ;•;:.• BIRTHS. On the sth inst. the Hon. Mrs. f. Palmer ; of Skelfil4l44" Hall, Leicestershire, ola Daughter:. ~ • 0 the "th inst . at Naburtr, near York, the Lady o . George Palmer, Esq. of a Son :and Heir. • org' On the 13th inst. Mrs. Forbes, o f Upper PhiPinl• place, Kensington, of a Daughter. . . MARR/Aii„ On Thursday the ittinst, at Christ Church', Cork, tenant Heusinger, of the Duke of limns wick's , avjlq' '1 fvfiss Ruth 13unwbrth, daughter ool'Peter liunworth, 0 ' ' • Sir On Thursday last, by special license, a t MosclY, Thomas Edw. Winitmgtori, Bart. or Stattbrd Court, if to lsmaha, second d.rughter of j ksq.,al.l3'P'` Hai i•,- in the ecninty - ol.Wortestet. At etiderley, in'Gloucestershire, the Rey. Ajartin W.- ) . 1 ci' Prebendary of Salisburyto Miss Llizabeth Blagdeti Ha ; daughter of the late John Hall, Esq. • DIED. On the igth of, lone. at Is htples, .in the 70th Ye• 111- age, the Right Reir. Luke Concal non. , Alortlctay lenit:the infant son of J. 11. 14 house in Devonshire-place. - • : COAL MARKET, No./A A B ER 14. Shil}s.qt Market. Sinks sold. I' rict. - 4o NeweaStiu • . i 276 6d.• fu 665. 0 " T. S undurlitnd . 44 . .19s 6a. to gas• c“t. Cinders . . t . 3 . 35. od. to ° PRICE Ul. .3 tOCA. - .5 I( ESISkt DAY. Sank Stock - , India Stock, Navy i per Cent. loci it India Bonds, 265. VS. P r :,, Irish 5 per Cent. ' EN:Chet!: MI6, 9S. ' i 35. 0 5 . 7 4 per Cent. Sz 1 4 i , . pr. i per Ct. Red. 65 i 66' 4 66* Oinnium, Si 43 die. i /.per Ct. Cons. 66ii 67 6Gg Imperial 3 per Cent. , hank L. Ann. 17 i3..,6 th s C ons . f or 2 y t hi ns' . 66i 'if v *Wet, Groglenor squ a ftl add' T o wh the • Rind (10 111 ti, ht Qt% -eez 1 an'! "10t1 11 0 tea t r . try tod Se I. o ;"nce 41. 1 few A d '' : /qui-A I 1 .; 444,, Ii" t ‘q: I(3 me q.ENE T en i t t itry 1), ?t r il k 114 ° ,1 1 , 4 We e e , lob o ' A N h Ni t ! ht 25, j 4 0 11;\ (i th eir t;'";1,11 11 l i r ttiarte. t. t ri° rnsb • , N ry ?,3$ 411 d iii th' a ' , :t t YtH Ti! I l\T E XT sh• CI -I— tt Capita re et s- „ amoi l 'ANtict tot el of oh ta . zss HNit tt `K rets arl oee .l; 7ar , s Co rnh i i TH4 te Nt t . foch t lei 4 'oll 041 f Sti 3 y be rriq tv e 4 t f h ot .ry tr 44 Polish ish, Ewar 44 • 4 Sso tAI T it i ° il t ! 1-4 1 E: juy yA -s• fel m'acit ' 4 ,'~Q ~~ INIE f r - c.