The Sun. — London, England, 1836-06-30 00:00:00

the people—the people, as contradistinnished from the other three ? Why, then, Lord Melbourne (who deals now and then, we are aware, in curious books) may have read some edition of EngLsh history with which we arc unacquainted. The reformation was prepared by the clergy, as its teachers ; it was proclaimed and enforced by the Crown, as its protector ; it was eagerly accepted by the leading nobility, and by a large proportion of the gentry, as well as by the people ; nor, except during. the short and odious reign of Mary, was there one se rious attempt in any quarter to re-establish Popery from the year 1536 to 1685, a period of 150 years, when it cost the bigot King and his posterity their Crown. There was here, at least, no triumph over Crown or clergy by " the people ;" the two former were for a century and a half in cordial concurrence against Popery with the bulk of the nation. The seven bishops were the last sufferers for that cause of religious purity which the mass of the people of Eng land loved, until this recent persecution of the clergy in our own days by the Popish enemies of all free dom, civil and religious, whose oppression is prac tised under the sacred name of l►berty. For the revolution, we admit at once that the greater number of the squirearchy were opposed to it : but what of that ? It was maintained by the heads of the nobility, as the constitutional monarchy, the blessed fruit of that revolution, is now. It was supported by the Universities, the firm opponents of Popery. It was upheld by the intelligence and com mercial influence of the nation, as the consti tutional monarchy is now by the great concen trated masses of property, both territorial and com mercial. Are the malcontent squires, from 1688 down to 1727, the period of George ll.'s accession, to be na med for a moment, in point of authority and in trinsic power, with the Lords and Commons, the in telligence and public principle of the present day—all satisfied with the Constitution as it stands, ar.d reso lute to preserve it ? When the Septennial Bill was carried, and the House of Hanover thereby irresistibly strengthened, it passed the House of Lords by a large majority. Is this among the proofs referred to by Lord Melbourne that " Dynasties have been main tained upon the Throne" in spite of that power which his Lordship affects to hold light, because it now stands in front of the free Monarchy of Great Britain, and in stern opposition to those vile schemes and fac tions, of the first of which his Lordship is the cham pion, as of the second he is the tool. Lord Mel bourne has no comprehension of the state of England at this moment, when he talks of contrasting the class of gentlemen with the intelligent and effective body of the people. Setting apart the uneducated and hard working multitude, all the higher classes of the British nation, agricultural, commercial, proprietors, capital ists, are so intermingled, and so fused, that none but an untaught or unscrupulous politician will venture, even in thought, to assert any definite separation amongst them into adverse schools of doctrine or of action with reference to the funda mental principles of government, or to the neces sity or inexpediency of organic changes, whether in Church or State. It is dull folly to draw such con sequences or to risk such irrelevant allusions as those wherein the Radical Prime Minister seemeth to re joice, and his trumpeters of the Press to glory, in. To sober minds they but bear evidence of a shallow genius and a loose and reckless disposition. The des tinies of England might as well be committed to a set of strolling players or a gang of Gipsies as to such a man, and the sort of associates in whom l►e is likely to confide. Lord Melbourne, too, it appears, thought fit to presume on his growing majorities in the House of Commons as proof of an increased hold over the nation. On what does he rest such flattering pros pects ? On the sole phenomenon of the Irish Muni cipal Bill, a measure which has made so little way in Ireland, and with whose spirit and tendencies, operating upon the local condition of Ireland, Englishmen are so imperfectly acquainted, that the Members of the House of Commons have not deerr►ed it worth their while to make a stand upon it for the general maintenance of our institutions, and have let the majority slip on without much attention. But what is the hinge of the Melbourne Ministry ? What, from the outset, was the test of their solidity ? The Irish Church Bill, and the appropriation clause. How has their majo rity shown itself with regard to that measure ? Their last and greatest was 39. It was their last, and we appeal to the truth and honour of our Conservative representatives, that 39 shall still have been their largest majority on that vital measure. We are sure that this adjuration cannot be made in vain. We know the strength of the Conservative cause, and we know that if the last majority be not on this Irish Church Bill, the cause will have been undermined by treachery, not by fair and open fighting. We look, therefore confidently to Monday next, and we shall not look in vain. The sworn destroyers of the Irish Church announce that they have some ominous an tics in preparation for tl►at important day. Let ma noeuvres, then, be left to those familiar with the use of them. Conservatives need them not, and will scorn a recourse to them, whether by themselves or others.— Times. The most intense interest pervades the public mind as to the course to be pursued in order to bring the House of Lords to the concession of those rights which the Ministry and Commons of England have granted to the claims of justice and the people. Various modes have been proposed for the accomplishment of an ami cable understanding between the law-givers chosen by the people, and those whom nature, as it would appear, has pre-ordained from their birth to exercise the high functions of legislation. The circumstance in which the country is placed is, no doubt, one of difficulty, but it is a difficulty in which a safe and satisfactory result is far more likely to be secured by a bold and de termined course of action, than by a timid, doubting uncertain policy, which can have no other effect than to lose the confidence of one parts , without making any impression on the other, unless that of provoking , its contempt. Let us briefly examine the different pro positions which have been recommended for adoption. It has first been proposed to dissolve the Parlia ment. Of this proceeding, under present circum stances, we confess that we can neither see the neces sity nor the object. In the present House of Commons, though convoked under Tory auspices, the Ministry and Reform have a majority on the great questions at issue, amply and distinctly expressive of the national will. In this regard, the increase - of Liberal Mem bers certain to be gained by a general election ii unne cessary. The other advantage to be gained by a ge neral election—the affording to the people an oppor tunity of making a simultaneous manifestation of their sentiments—may be nearly as perfectly achieved by means of public meetings, for which we rejoice to perceive preparations are in progress in several parts of the kingdom, and by which it is incumbent on every county, town, district, and parish throughout the empire, to demonstrate their adherence to the princi ples so outrageously assailed by oligarchical despotism. A creation of Peers has also been propowd. This is the most absurd proposition of all—it is the nostrum of a Charlatan—an attempt to cast out Beelzebub by means of Beelzebub. What would be thought of the person who, when the House of Commons opposed public opinion, would have recommended a creation of nomination boroughs, for the purpose of carrying one or two measures, and as soon as the immediate object of their creation might be effected, ranging themselves amongst the enemies of Reform and the people ? Would not the person who would make such a proposition be set down as demented, or worse ? And the proposition of outvoting the opposition of the House of Peers by an addition to the rotten elements of its constitution is not a whit more rational nor ef fective. A creation of Peers would merely extend the ramifications of hereditary legislation, and render it more difficult of eradication—an end essential to the unembarrassed action of representative government. The moment a man becomes a Peer he has the strongest inducements of self-interest " to stand by his order ;" or, if patriotism prevail in the individual, ten to one his successor will have imbibed the pre judices and despotic intolerance of his class, and stand in opposition to the principl of popular government. Hereditary legislation must abolished. We can e t no longer submit to sacrifice ou interests to antiquated absurdity. Should a Reform Ministry create Peers to carry one measure, an Anti-reform Ministry may here after follow the precedent, and annul the same mea sure by pimilar means. The possibility' of swaying the national Councils by a creation of Pecrs, is one of tl►e strongest proofs of the folly and ineffi ciency of receiving laws from a source which may pour forth either a pure or polluted stream, as the executive may will. In fact, if the elective • principle be much longer withheld as the basis of" the House of Lords, public scrutiny may look still deeper into the economy of legislation, and inquire whether the alleged advantages of a second chamber be sufficient to counterbalance the evils of the delay, embarrassment, and opposition which it too frequently gives to providing for the public necessities, and com plying with the national desires. The Lords for years, we might say centuries, have stood in opposition to the rights and interests of the people, and we defy any man to look back to events—to compare the evil with the good of which they have been the cause, and deny that they have not themselves demonstrated by experience the injurious consequences of such a system of legislation. On one occasion they were justly voted a nuisance. Such a vote has been proposed in the present emergency ;. but we greatly question whether the people are yet so thoroughly prepared for such an important change as to afford it the support of that overwhelming majority, without which any at tempt to carry it into effect could not fail to be mis chievous. This course is, therefore, of very ques tionable eligibility at the present moment. Though there can be no doubt that in no great length of time a perseverance in the obstinate and perverse courses which the Lords have lately pursued, must render the people unanimous upon the subject. What course, then, remains to be pursued ? An address has been proposed by Mr. W. S. O'Brien, to be pre sented by the House of Commons to his Majesty, having for its object the assertion of the same prin ciples of government in Ireland as those which direct that of this country. We conceive this to be a tem perate proceeding, and one which may advantageously be adopted in the interim which must take place be tween the conception and consumMation of the great event—The I?fornz f the House of Lords. The following are the proposed resolutions : " That this House has witnessed with deep regret and anxious concern the rejection by the other House of Parliament of a Bill for the reform of the Municipal Cor porations of Ireland, similar in principle to those which, in former sessions, have received the sanction of the Legis lature for the reform of the municipal institutions of Eng land and Scotland. " That to deny to the natives of Ireland the same civil franchises which of right belong equally to the whole people of these realms, is to violate the spirit of the treaty of Union ; to annul the great charter of emancipation ; and to take from the connection of Great Britain with Ireland its best and surest guarantee—mutual confidence founded upon equal rights and a common interest. " That the first effect of the adoption of a distinctive principle of legislation in regard to the two countries, has been to withhold for a time from Ireland the blessings of well-regulated municipal government, whilst its ulterior and more dangerous tendencies are to excite among her people those sentiments of resentment and discontent which are the never-failing result of injustice and oppression. " That this House deems it an act of duty towards the people of Ireland, under their present disappointment, to renew the solemn assurance which in a former session it coupled with its resolution to maintain inviolate the Legis lative Union, and by continuing to assert their right to good municipal institutions, to redeem the pledge then given, that it would persevere in applying its best atten tion to the removal of every just cause ofcomplaint, and the promotion of every well-considered measure of improve ment.' " That an humble address be presented to his Majesty, founded upon the foregoing resolutions. " That they be also communicated to the Lords."— [Tuesday, sth Jul y.]—Morning Advertiser, The writers in the Ministerial Press, while they in dulge their blind fury against the House of Lords, ap pear to be strangely forgetful of the circumstances going on around them. They assert, with great vio lence, that the majority of the Peers " have no inte rests—no feelings in common with those of the people." The assertion is as easy as it is impudent, but where is the proof ? If we want to know what the feelings of the people are, it will scarcely be denied that the elec tions under the new franchises, created by the Reform Act, are fair tests by which those feelings may be ascer tained. Now, there have been, within a few weeks, three county elections, and in all of them, candidates upholding the same political principles as the majority of the House of Lords have been successful. In Es sex, in Merionethsire, and now in Warwickshire, the people have shown that the assertion of the Ministerial organ is not true ; but that, on the contrary, the people approve of that political conduct which the Ministers oppose and denounce. Nor has the deci sion of the people in these counties been at all of a doubtful character, or attested by slender majorities. In all of them the Conservative majorities have been • overwhelining, not leaving the Ministerial candidates the slightest shadow of a chance from the beginning to the end of the contest. How, then, can it be pretended, except with an impudent design to misrepresent the facts, that the people have no feelings in common with the Conservative majority in the Upper House of Par liament ? Will it be answered that these counties are places in which the feelings and voices of the people have not fair play? We should not be surprised if that misre presentation, too, were attempted; but facts prove the contrary. It is a strange compliment to the Reform Act to say that, under its provisions, a fair election cannot take place where there are adverse influences on the part of holders of property; but, waiving this, we mean to say that the evidence of facts proves that it is not from undue influence, but from a re-action in favour of Protestant and Conservative principles, that these counties have sent to Parliament Conservative Re presentatives. At the first election after the Reform Act, the candidate for Warwickshire, who has just now been rejected, was returned. The same influences of property which exist now, existed then ; but the people have had some painful experience of those whom they then thought their friends. They believed that gentle men who had promoted reform, would make that reform the foundation of political peace and security. They had no idea that the popular influence which had been introduced into the House of Commons, would be immediately turned aga - •,nst the Protestant Church, and the established Constitution. They never sup posed that an alliance would be entered into with O'Connell and the Irish Roman Catholic priests, for the promotion of anti-Protestant and revolutionary principles. But time has been their instructor. They have seen, as we have seen, with deep regret, this great accession to the people's strength in the House of Commons turned against the interests and feelings which are most dear to the people, and therefore they have resolved to return Conservative Members to the House of Commons ; and yet the Ministerialists tell us, that the O'Connell majority in the House of Commons, " respond to the feelings of the country, but the majority of the Lords do not !" The evidence which facts supply proves the direct contrary of this. It is said also that " the purposes of a second branch of the Legislature cannot be answered by the House of Lords, as at present constituted." It might be enough to answer to this assertion that they can, for one assertion is as good as another ; but if the pro position were put forward as the commencement of an argument, we should answer that it all depends upon what the purposes of a second branch of time Legisla ture are. If these purposes be merely to " take sug gestion" from majorities of the House of Commons—if they be merely to publish second editions of the Bills sent up by the Lower House—if they be to act upon prin ciples of fear and submission, and not upon principles o f independence and honest judgment—then we admit that such purposes cannot be answered by the House . of Peers as at present constituted. But such ought not to be the purposes of any branch of the Legisla ture. We should as strongly object to the Commons sacrificing their independence to the Lords as we do to the Lords sacrificing their independence to the Com mons. If either House is to be guided, not by its own independent judgment, but by the will or judgment of the other House, there is evidently no use fora second House of Parliament at all. And if there were no second House, God help the liberties of the people of England. The government of a despot is sufficiently odious and tyrannical ; but an assembly calling itself popular, but without any control upon its party ani mosities and hasty judgments, is the most cruel tyranny of all. The common trick of faction is to use the people for selfish ends, under the pretence of acting for the people. Let no one suppose that such tyrannical trickery .is obsolete. A Ministerial Paper of yesterday incau- THE SUN, LONDON, THURSDAY, JUNE 30, 1836. tionslt enough, - avows its active existence at this mo ment. The passage runs thus, '' The men in whom the people chiefly repose confidence (the present Mi nisters ate intended to be indicated by this periphrasis) must determine whether the time for rousing them (the people) to the effort necessary for effecting such a change in the House of Lords as is necessary has ar rived." It will be seen by this passage that the people are looked upon as mere instruments in the hands of the Ministers. The " rousing" spoken of, is not to be spontaneous—it is not to come from the people's own convictions, but to be the work of the Ministers, just at the time that it may happen to be wanted ! If the people were mere cattle, mere beasts of burden, they could not be spoken of in a more contemptuous man ner, and yet this is from the organ of an Administration which calls itself popular ! We are happy to find that the people seem to understand these Ministers, and their organs.—Morning Herald. Captain Bluett, R. N., on receiving the 3d Class, by the Earl of Minto. Captain Manby presented to the King a code of instructions in the French language for the preservation of lives and pro perty from shipwreck. After the Levee the Bishop of Durham (late Bishop of Chichester) was introduced to the King in the Royal Closet, where his Lordship did homage on his translation to the see of Durham. Lord John Russell, Secretary of State for the Home Department, and the Dean of Hereford, Deputy Clerk of the Closet, assisted at the ceremony. The Cabinet Ministers and the Great Officers of State were present in the , Royal Closet. His Majesty held a Privy Council, which was attended by the Lord President, the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Privy Seal, the First Lord of the Treasury, the Secretaries of State for the Home, Foreign, and Colonial Departments ; die Chancellor of the Exchequer, the First Lord of the Ad miralty, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, the Pre sident of the Board of Control, the President of the Board of Trade, and Lord Denman, Chief Justice of the Court of King's Bench. At the Council a number of reports from the Judicial Committee were arproved of. The Hon. William Bathurst was the Clerk of the Council in Waiting. The Recorder of London was afterwards introduced, and made a report to the King in Council. The King gave audiences to the Marquis Conyngham, Marquis of Winchester, Lord Byron, Lord Holland, Viscount Palmerston, Marquis of Lansdowne, the Lord Chancellor, Viscount Melbourne, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Viscount Duncannon, Lord Glenelg, Earl of Minto, Lord John Russell, Earl of Albemarle, and Lord Hill. Viscount Torrington was the Lord, and Sir C. Paget and Sir Robert Otway the Grooms in Waiting. The Duke of Cumberland visited the King yesterday. In addition to the Royal Family who dined with their Ma jesties at the Queen's Lodge in Bushey-park, on Tuesday, the following were present :---Lord G. Seymour, Lord and Lady De Lisle, Lord Adolphus Fitzclarence, Sir Horace Seymour and Lady Clinton, Sir Walthen Waller, Sir G. and Lady Seymour, Sir B. Stephenson. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF COMMONS, JUNZ 29. The SPEAKER took the Chair at the usual hour. LONDON AND BRIGHTON RAILWAY.— (STEPHENSON'S LINE.) Lord GEORGE LENNOX moved the third reading of Stephenson's Line of London and Brighton Railway. Captain ALSAGER did not intend to oppose the third reading, but would observe, before the Bill passed, that he regretted the petitions from Brighton against the Bill had not met with more attention. A clause was then added by way of rider, after which the Bill was read a third time and passed. On the motion of Sir W. GEARY, the time for the Committee to report on the Medway Navigation Bill was extended to the 11th of July. METROPOLITAN SUSPENSION BRIDGE. On the motion of Mr. TENNYSON D'EYNCOURT the Metropolitan Suspension Bridge Bill was read a third time and passed. On the motion of Mr. TOOKE the Thring and He neage Estates Bills were severally read a third time and passed. On the motion of Mr. BOWES the South West Dur ham Junction Railway Bill was read a third time and passed. On the motion of Mr. EWART, the Liverpool Court of Requests' Bill was read a third time and passed. Mr. VIVIAN moved the third reading of the Swansea Harbour Bill.—Read a third time and passed. On the motion of Mr. T. DUNCOMBE, the London and Blackwall Commercial Railway Bill was read a third time and passed. IRISH CORPORATION REFORM. Mr. PARROTT presented a petition from Totness, in Devonshire, praying the House not to agree to the amendments made by the House of Lords iu this Bill. FACTORIES' ACT. Mr. H. SMITH presented a petition from the factory labourers in the manufactories of Mr. Bradshaw of Stock port, of Mr. Potter of Manchester, of Mr. Marshall of Leeds, and others, praying the House not to force the children to work more than ten hours a day. He sincerely supported the prayer of the petition, because he thought that ten hours was a sufficient time for weak children to work. HIS MAJESTY'S LEVEE. His Majesty arrived in town soon after one o'clock yesterday afternoon from Windsor Castle. . . ' His Majesty held a Levee. The Knights of the scvera Orders of Knighthood wore their respective collars, it being a collar day. At the entree levee Commendator Manley, Adjutant. Gene ral of the Papal Forces (from Rome), was presented to his Majesty by his Excellency the Count Ludolf, the Neapolitan and Sicilian Minister. Prince Alfonse de Brezenheim, an officer in the Austrian army, was presented to his Majesty by M. Hummelauer, the Austrian Charge d'Affairs, The Baron de Maltitz was presented to his Majesty as Charge d'Affaires, in the absence of Count Pozzo di Borgo, the Russian Ambassador. Count d'Ugglas, Swedish Dragoon Guards, was presented to the King by Count Bjornstjerna, the Swedish Minister. Count Canneguy Duchatel, and M. Duvergier de Hau ranne, Member of the Chamber of Deputies, were presented to the King by Count Sebastiani, the French Ambassador. The Levee was attended by Prince Charles of Solms, Prince Galatzin, the French Ambassador ; the Neapolitan, Prussian, Sardinian, Swedish, Wurtemberg, Hanoverian, Danish, Gre cian, Ottoman, Bavarian, Netherlands, and Saxon Ministers: the Austrian and Russian Charg6s d'Affaires ; Count Gram mont, Secretary to the French Embassy; M. Vogoridis, Se cretary to the Turkish Legation ; Count Louis de Jegcrsch jold, Imperial Russian Guard; Baron d'Ompteda, Hanoverian Jaeger Guards ; the Archbishop of York, the Lord Steward, Lord Chamberlain, Groom of the Stole, Master of the Horse, Commander of the Forces, Captain of the Hon. Corps of Gen tlemen at Arms, Captain of the Yeoman Guard; Viscount Com bermere, Gold Stick in Waiting • Lord Denman Chief Justice of the King's Bench ; Master- General of the Ordnance ; Sir E. C. Disbrowe, his Majesty's Envoy Extraordinary and Mi nister Plenipotentiary to the King of the Netherlands ; the Vice Chamberlain, the Treasurer of the Household, the Comp troller of the Household, the Master of the Ceremonies; Lord Saltoun, Colonels Lord Dufferin, Sir Robert Gardiner, and Sir C. Broke Vere, Aides de Camp to the King; the Recor der of London, M. P. ; Mr. T. Reeve, Standard.bearer, and Mr. Albert Beetham, Clerk of the Cheque, to the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen at Arms ; Captain Houlton, Ensign, and Mr. Charles Hancock, Exon in Waiting, of the Yeoman Guard ; Dean of Hereford, Clerk of the Closet in. Waiting ; Captain G. Pechell, R.N., M.P., Equerry to the Queen ; Lieutenant- Colonel Reid, Second Life Guards, Silver Stick ; Lord Kilmarnock, Page of Honour; Lieutenant-Colonel Sir Frederick Smith, and Captain Smith, Gentlemen Ushers in Waiting ; and the following— DUKES—Cleveland, Wellington, Leinster. MARQulssEs—Huntley, Ely, Exeter. EARLS—Bandon, Spencer, Jersey, Harrewby. LORDS—Ward, Byron, Lilford, Hotham, Hatherton. RIGHT HON.—Sir Robert Gordon, Joseph Planta. How.—Captain George Campbell, R.N., Sir F. Pellew, R.N., John Dutton, F. Littleton. Sias—C. Domville, R.M. ; S. Seton, of Staffa ; J. Graham, J. Campbell, T. Phillipps, Bart. ; J. Barrow. REV. MESSIEURS—R. S. Burton, G. Trevor, J. P. Horsford. ALDERMEN—T. Wood, White. MESSIEURS—C. Cavendish, Shaw Lefevre, M. P. ; T. A. Curtis, Forbes, Ross, of Bladensburg ; M. C. Cramer Roberts, Hawley, T. Davey, Benyon, Francken, Spearman, L. Otway, W. W. Brown, Goring, Daykin, Branston, M. P. ; H. Ad dington, M. Elton, Johnson, E. J. Dawkins, Norris, John Lefevre, J. W. Sutherland Dean, G. Fortescue. ADMIRALS—Sir C. Paget, Sir C. Adam, Sir W. Hotham, Sir E. Codrington. CAPTAINS, R. N.—Trotter, Bluett, Sir S. Peyton, K. C. 11. ; Sir J. Franklin, J. Scott, Burney, C. Talbot, Tower, Sir J. A. Gordon, Sir W. Symonds. CAPTAINS ( TRINITY HOUSE)—PeIIy, A. Chapman, M.P. ; Weller. COMMANDERS, R. N.—Sweny, Hon. W. Devereux, H. G Hamilton, W. Allen. LIEUTENANTS, R.N.—J. Macgladery, S. Ussber. GENERALS-Lord Aylmer, Sir J. Cameron, Sir T. Mon tresor, Sir P. Riall, Sir J. Nicolls, Sir M. Disney, Sir R. Dundas, Corner, Sir J. Macleod, Sir L. Otway, Sir R. D. Jackson, Goldie, Sir J. Fuller, Earl of Cork. COLONELS-Powell, • C. J. Doyle, Sir J. Harvey, Baker, Buckworth, Mansel, M.P.drant, Baker, Fyers, K. Money. MAJORS-Thorpe, Elrington, Ratcliffe. CAPTAINS-Hon. R. Boyle, Manby, Fladgate, F. Corner, Sir R. Barrie, W. Moore, Codrington. LIEUTENANTS-Cavendish, Powell, Domvile, G. F. Symp son, Hon. R. V. Powys, Barlow, J. Trower, J. G. Gaitskell, Durham. CORNETS-H. Dare, A. Hamilton. ENSIGN—G. P. Manse!. The following petitions were presented to the King : From the landed proprietors and residents of the Union of Athlcague and Fuerty, in the counties of Roscommon and Galway, praying his Majesty not to sanction the Bill for Re forming Municipal Corporations in Ireland, unless it contains some such amendments as those proposed in the House of Lords, for the protection of his Majesty's Protestant subjects, by the Earl of Bandon. From the diocese of Clogher, in support of the Church, and against the Appropriation Clause, &c., by the Marquis of Ely. The following were presented to his Majesty : The Duke of Cleveland, on appointment to be Custos Rotu lorum of the county of Durham, by Lord Melbourne. Lord Ward, by Lord Hatherton. Lieut. Powell, 37th Regiment, on his return from Jamaica, by his father, Colonel Powell, M. P. The Rev. R. S. Barton, by the Lord Bishop of Durham. Lieutenant Cavendish, 10th Royal Hussars, by Mr. C. Ca- vendish. Ensign G. Pleydell Mansell, on his appointment to the 53d Regiment, by Major-Gen. Lord Fitzroy Somerset, K. C. B. Lieutenant Domville, on his appointment to the Royal Artil lery, by his uncle, Sir Compton Domville. Count Louis de Jegerschjold, Imperial Russian Guard, by the Hon. Sir Fleetwood Pellew. - Mr. Ross, of Bladensburg, by the Earl of Charlemont. Mr. Hawley, by the Duke of Richmond. Mr. J. Davey, N.C. S., by Sir Robert Campbell. Mr. Benyon, Deputy Lieutenant, West [tiding of Yorkshire, by Mr. Wm. Brown. Mr. M. C. Cramer Roberts, by the Duke of Leinster. Lieutenant Durham, 37th Regiment, on his return from Ja maica, by Colonel Powell, M. P. Lieutenant J. G. Gaitskell, on his return from India, by Sir James Rivett Carnac, Bart. Lieutenant Jasper Trower, on his return from India, by Vis count Combermere. Alderman Thomas Wood, by the Lord Mayor. Mr. Forbes, by Lord Palmerston. Hon. Mr. Littleton, by Lord Hatherton. Mr. John W. Sutherland, Deputy Lieutenant of the County of Surrey, on his return from abroad, by Major-General Sir John Maclean, K. C. 11. Captain Sir J. S. Peyton, K. C. H., on his appointment to his Majesty's ship" Madagascar, by the Earl of Minto. Captain James Scott, R. N., on his return from foreign ser vice, by the Earl of Minto. Commander Sweny, on his return from foreign service, by the Earl of Minto. Commander the Honourable Walter Devereux, on promotion and return from foreign service, by the Earl of Minto. Lieutenant John Nlacgladery, IL N., by the Earl of Minto. Mr. Alderman White, by the Lord Mayor. Lieut.-Colonel Baker, on his promotion, by Viscount Pal merston. Earl Spencer, on coming to his title, by Viscount Duncannon. Cornet Hall Dare, Essex Yeomanry, by Mr. Bramston. Colonel A. Hamilton, by Lieutenant-General Sir P. Riall. Commander W. Allen, R. N., on his promotion, by the Earl of Minto. Lieut.-Colonel Mansel, C. 8., late of 53d Regiment, by Lord Hill. Mr. Norris, on his return from India, by Sir J. Hobhouse. Lieutenant-Colonel C. J. Doyle, on his appointment as Lieut. Governor of Grenada, by Lord Glenelg. Honourable John Dutton, by the Earl of Albemarle. Mr. L, Otway, on 'his return from Spain, by his father, Sir L. W. Otway. Colonel Sir John Harvey, Lieutenant-Governor of Prince Ed ward's Island, to take leave. Rev. G. Trevor, Chaplain to the Forces in Madras, on appoint mont and departure, by the Right Hon. Sir J. Hobhouse. Lieutenant `Sidney Ussher, R.N., on his return from the West Indies, by the Earl of Minto. Captain Sir William Symonds, It. N., on Knighthood, by the 147,ari of Minto. Rev. James P, Ilorsford, on his return to Ceylon, by Lord Glenelg. Captain Hon. Robert Boyle, on appointment to the Coldstream Guards, by General the Earl of Cork. Captain Fladgate, by Viscount Combermere. Captain F'. Corner, by his father, Lieut.-General Corner. Lieutenant G. P. Simpson, by Lieut.-General Sir H. Vivian. Lieutenant Hon. R. V. Powys, on his return from India, by Lord Lilford. Lieutenant Barlow, on his return from India, by the Hon. Sir Charles Greville. Lieutenant- Colonel Baker, on promotion. The following were presented on being made members of the Royal QuelPhic Order; — Captain Sir John Franklin, 4.N., on receiving the honour of a Knight Commander, by Lord Qlenelg, Major Thorpe, on receiving the 3d Class, by Lieut,-General Sir James liempt, Sir John Campbell, on receiving the 3d Class, by Sir John Hobhouse, IRISH CORPORATE REFORM. Mr. GILLON presented a petition from Lanark and another from Linlithgow, stating that the petitioners were impressed with the advantages which England and Scot land had derived from Municipal Reform, and praying the House to grant a similar measure of Reform to Ireland. The Hon. Member also presented a petition from Lanark praying that a W. suffrage might be extended to that boroug ; and a petition from 5,000 inhabitants of Kirkin tulloch, praying the House not to grant any money as an additional endowment to the Church of Scotland. ELECTIVE FRANCHISE. _ Mr. C. FERGUSON presented a petition from the magistrates and householders of the borough of Castle Douglas, praying for an extension of the extensive franchise. The petitioners stated that the franchise ought to be the same as in the royal burghs. LIGHT-HOUSES. The HoN. MEMBER then stated that he wished to make a few observations in explanation of what had fallen from him regarding Light-houses. He had received a communi cation from the engineer, to whom he had then alluded, requesting him to state whether the report of his speech was accurate, which attributed to him (Mr. C. Ferguson) having used the words that the engineer had made a survey of the Harbour of Kirkcudbright on a Sunday. What he had stated was that the engineer had made a survey on one day, which he supposed had been mistaken for Sunday. He had been requested to make this correc tion, which he did because the individual stated that the error had caused great injury to him and his family, and it would be extremely improper that that erroneous impression should go abroad. TITHES. Mr. SHARMAN CRAW FORD presented a peti tion from Mr, W. Parker, of Passage West, county of Cork, which stated the effects which the immoderate use of ardent spirits have in producing destitution mad increasing crime in the population of Ireland, and prays that the House may pass more efficacious laws than those now in existence against habitual drunkards ; also a petition from Downpatrick, in the County of Down, in which the Petitioners state that the system of Tithes paid to the Established Church of Ireland is one of the most degrad ing and oppressive remnants of the penal code. They pray that your Honourable House will never desist till you have effected the total and unequivocal abolition and annihilation of that obnoxious national grievance ; and that you will re• pudiate with contempt any commutation or substitution for them under a less offensive name. They pray farther that your Honourable House will lend your effectual aid to that universal liberator of mankind, Daniel O'Connell, in reforming the House of Lords, and destroying irresponsible power. Also petitions from iDonagheavy, Tyrone ; Maghera, Londonderry ; Moss Town, Louth ; and Rabeen, Queen's county, praying for the total ex tinction of tithes in name and substance. _ Colonel BUTLER presented 24 petitions, signed by 22,000 persons in the county Kilkenny, praying for the total abolition of tithes. COACH DUTIES. Mr. HUME presented a petition from the proprietors of stage coaches running between London and Cambridge, complaining of the high rate of duties to which they were liable, while the omnibuses were comparatively speaking untaxed. He trusted his Majesty's Government would take the case of the petitioners into their consideration. The Honourable Member then presented a petition from the licensed sellers of beer at Kensington, complaining of the vexatious operation of the laws regarding the sale of that article ; also petitions from benefit societies of South ampton and London, complaining of the restrictions which prevented their managing their own funds. He feared it was too late to introduce any measure during_ the present session, but he hoped the attention of the House would be called to it early in the next. The Hon. Gentle man also presented a petition from a place in the county of Anglesea, complaining of the appointment of Bishops in Wales who were not acquainted with the Welsh language. He thought the regulation a wise one which prevented the appointment of clergymen in Wales who were not ac quainted with the Welsh language, and it ought to be ex tended to the Episcopal Bench. Sir R. I%IUSGRAVE presented a petition from the county of Waterford, praying for the total abolition of Tithes. Also two petitions to the same effect from parishes in the same county. Sir R. BATESON presented a petition from the Clergy of the Diocese of Down and Connor against the principle introduced into that - House by his Majesty's Ministers, with regard to the a ppropriation of Church Property. The petitioners stated that they believed it was the intention to appropriate Church property to other than the propagation of the doctrines of the National Church. The petitioners prayed that the House would preserve the Church in its ancient and undoubted rights, and secure its property from being applied to any other purposes than those to which it was by law consigned. Mr. CH ALMERS presented a petition from Montrose, in favour of a 5/. household franchise. The Earl of LINCOLN presented petitions from Stockport and other places, against the Factory Amend ment Bill ; also a petition praying for an inquiry into the issues of private us well as public banking establishments. Mr. TENNYSON D'EYNCOURT pr9sented a peti tion from t l arnheth 3 complaining of the heavy assessment to which they have been subjected far building places of wor ship. About 16 years ago a 13i11 was passed for the build ing of new churches, and for the church accommodation of Lambeth a sum of 10,000/. was only proposed to be charged, instead of which the trustees expended a sum of 34,000/., and they owed 24,000/., and the Church Com missioners advanced 16,000/., so that the entire sum ex pended amounted altogether to 70,000/. All this has pressed heavily on the inhabitants, who have no redress, as the trustees are a self-elected body, and consider themselves irresponsible. All these proceedings have led to great embarrassment in the parish, and to such an extent, that at the present moment 2,000 distress-warrants are out to levy the expenses on the parishioners. This has created such an alienation from the Established Church, that they came to a resolution in the parish the other day to negative the church-rate. In the parish, which has a population of 50,000, there are 30,000 Dissenters, and it operates with peculiar hardship on them, who have to support their own clergy. The petitioners prayed that the Church Commis sioners would indemnify them from the losses and expense, or that the House would afford them redress. After a few words from Mr. Hawes, Mr. Wynn, and Mr. Wilks, the petition was ordered to lie on the table. DR. MULHOLLAND. Mr. Sergeant JACKSON had a petition to present, .of which he had given notice, from Dr. Mulholland, a Roman Catholic clergyman in Ireland, praying that the House might adopt some mode to afford him, and clergymen simi larly circumstanced with him, the benefit of the canon-law. The petitioner was ordained in Kilkenny in 1815, and after sonic time he proceeded to Rome, where he remained for eight years, and took out a degree of D.D. In 1826 he visited Ireland, and was appointed by the Titular Arch bishop of Armagh to a parish of the same description as that of a perpetual curate in the Established Church, and which he had as good a right to hold as any other parish Cler gyman. In 1833 some disturbances broke out in the county of Down by a lawless party, and petitioner was accused by the clergyman of a neighbouring parish of encouraging the disturb ers of the public peace, on which he made applications to his superior for redress, but got none. He was then obliged to go into a court of common law ; and, although he only got a farthing damages, yet it was sufficient to establish his character, and to repudiate the charge of which he had been accused. He now came to the grievance, and to the unwarrantable proceedings against the petitioner. In con sequence of having appealed to the laws of his country, he had, in the first instance, been suspended, and four days afterwards the Roman Catholic Primate thought fit to de prive him of his living. He appealed to the Court of Rome, and obtained letters to the Primate, with a promise of being re-instated. Mr. WYNN said, as the House could not in any way take cognizance of nor investigate the facts of the petition, he apprehended that it could not be received. To admit statements on one side, was to invite them on the other. He hoped, therefore, that his Hon. and Learned Friend would withdraw the petition. Mr. Sergeant JACKSON argued that this case differed essentially from that which occurred yesterday, inasmuch as here there could be no appeal to the ordinary tribunals of the country. The remedy was in the hands of the House only. Mr. ROEBUCK spoke to order. Mr. SCARLETT hoped the House would at least listen to the grievance. The SPEAKER remarked, that as the House could afford no redress, to present and discuss the petition seemed an inconvenient waste of time. Colonel PERCEVAL reminded the House that last night a similar petition had been received. Mr. Sergeant JACKSON had undertaken to lay the petition on the table, although of a different persuasion to the petitioner, because Dr. Mulholland had applied in vain to Roman Catholic Members, one of whom had advised him to submit unconditionally, and the other had told him that if he wished to be denounced in Ireland, he could pre sent the petition.---(Cries of " Chair," and " Order.") The SPEAKER could only refer the matter to the discretion of the Hon. and Learned Member, impressing upon him at the same time the inconvenience of the prac tice of presenting petitions which could be of no avail to the parties. Mr. Sergeant JACKSON saw no objection to the pe tition. If the Speaker thought otherwise he would at once sit down. The SPEAKER had no possible right to decide whether a petition should or should not be offered : all he had done was to state the inconvenience arising from the practice of presenting petitions of this kind. Mr. Sergeant JACKSON had nearly concluded all he had to state. Dr. Mulholland had been deprived of all means of subsistence, having committed no offence, but bringing an action for slander and recovering a verdict. He had applied again and again, and had obtained no re dress, although he certainly had received an exeat from the Roman Catholic Archbishop putting his character in the most favourable point of view for piety, zeal, and learning. Mr. GRATTAN was in favour of receiving the petition. Mr. WYNN repeated his objections to receiving it. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL read the prayer of the petition, and thought that the claim ought to be heard. After a few words from Mr. ROEBUCK, Mr. GRATTAN called upon the Hon. and Learned Member to explain what he meant by saying that a Ro man Catholic Member had feared to be denounced in Ireland. Mr. Sergeant JACKSON had so stated on the testi mony of Dr. Mulholland, who, on the 12th of May, had an interview in Dublin with the Hon. and Learned Mem ber for Tipperary, when he replied to a request to pre sent the petition, " No, no ; I would (should) be de nounced, and so should (would) you." Dr. Mulholland had also applied to the Hon. and Learned ex-Member for Dublin, who answered that he saw nothing that could be done, but for Dr. Mulholland unqualifiedly to submit. Mr. S. CRAWFORD had received a statement from the Right Rev. Dr. Crolly, denying the accusations in the petition. Mr. SCARLETT was in favour of receiving the petition. Mr. O'CONNELL—It is received. Mr. SCARLETT asked what was the question before the House The SPEAKER replied, that the petition do lie upon the table. Mr. SCARLETT did not know that it was impossible for the House to afford a remedy, and if it were not impos sible he saw no reason for rejecting the petition. Mr. O'CONNELL had received a letter from Dr. Mul. holland asking him to present this petition, and he had stated in his answer that the House could give him no re lief—that is to altering the law so as to make the canon law of Rome part of the law. No Member would support the proposition, and least of all himself. Therefore he had recommended the petitioner to submit, instead of attacking , and criminating his superiors. Dr. Mulholland had ap pealed to the Pope, and the Pope having decided against him, he wished to appeal from the Pope to the Parliament. He had no other remedy than submission, and in his (Mr. O'Connell's) judgment, he ought to have no other remedy. If the Rev. Gentleman had any desire to continue in the Roman Catholic Church, he had pursued a wrong course. If he meant to change his religion, his first step was well taken.—(Cheers.) Mr. BELLEW read a resolution, adopted at a meeting of the diocese in which Dr. Mulholland's living was si tuated, approving the dismissal of that gentleman. The same opinion had been publicly expressed throughout the district. Living in the same neighbourhood, he (Mr. Bellew) was acquainted with all the circumstances, and could say that all the petitioner's conduct had not been such as to be favourable to the well-being of his parish. The petition was laid on the table. THE CANADAS. Sir GEORGE GREY brought up a large body of papers relating to the present state of the Canadas. Mr. HUME asked whether any objection would be made to laying upon the table also the Address of the House of Assembly to Sir Francis Head respectin g Orange Lodges, with this reply, stating that he should not in terfere ? Mr. ROEBUCK put a question respecting certain pro clamations, relating, we believe, to the militia, hut the Hon. Member could not be heard in the gallery. He inquired, likewise, whether Ministers had received any and what re ports from the Canada Commissioners ? Sir GEORGE GREY answered that only partial re ports had yet been received from Canada, and that he had no other knowledge of the proclamation than that which he had derived from the newspapers. As to the alleged Ad dress about Orange Lodges, he was without any official in formation. All he knew regarding it was derived from a paragraph in a Canadian newspaper. Mr. HUME expressed his surprise that Government should be so late in its intelligonea t he bad received a copy of the Address upon Orange Lodges. OFFICERS OF THE HOUSE. Mr. HUME begged to call attention , to the resolutions proposed for adoption by the Select Committee on the subject of the House of Commons' officers' compensation, as no one establishment connected with that House could be completed until this matter was settled one way or the other. The matter, though public in its nature, was to be regarded strictly as private business, and therefore he hoped he should be allowed to move the resolutions as reported by the Select Committee. After a few words from an Hon. Member, Mr. Home, Mr. Alderman Wood, Sir It. Peel, MY,,, Smith, and Mr. Estcourt, Mr. HUME si4l that the Committee bad recommended that pelltaiu alterations should take place in the mode of remunerating the officers of that House. Mr. Alderman WOOD called the Hon. Member for Middlesex to order. He would take the opinion of the House on the question of whether the Orders of the Day should now be proceeded with or not. The House then divided, and the numbers tvereT Against the Amendment For the Amendment 55 Majority -64 Mr. HUME then proceeded to move the resolutions for carrying into effect the recommendations of the Committee, 'chose anxious desire had been to do all in their power to render justice to every individual. The following resolu tions were then agreed to : "That this House agree with the recommendations of the Select Committee, that the annual sum of 9111. he al lowed to Mr. John Pratt, the head door-keeper, during the time he shall continue to perform the duties of his offiet, in lieu of all salaries, fees, gratuities, and emoluments what soever. " That the annual sum of 8741. be allowed to Mr. Francis Williams, the unier door-keeper, during the time he shall continue to perform the duties of his office, in lieu of all salaries, fees, gratuities, and emoluments what soever. " That the annual salary of each of the door-keepers, oiler Mr. Pratt and Mr. Williams shall retire, be 4001., in lieu of all fees, gratuities, and emoluments whatsoever," The other resolutions, to the 13th inclusive, were then agreed to. On the 14th Resolution being proposed—" That the re commendation of the Committee, as to the future esta blishment of the Members' waiting-room, be approved," Mr. WIGNEY thought that, in comparison with the: salaries provided for some of the officers of the and which he d:d not consider too much, the allowan,e of one individual who had very arduous duties to perform was exceedingly disproportionate. Ho alluded to the individual who attended in the Members' lower waiting room. At present the income of that individual amounted to upwards of 600/. per annum ; from guinea fees alone he received 5601„ but of this he paid 200/. per annum, and he had also to pay an assistant and porter. That individual had filled that situation for fifteen years, which included seven teen sessions, and during that time he had never been ab sent from his post a single day. The Hon. Membel. con cluded by proposing, as an amendment, that the salary of Thomas Collet be 4001 a year, instead of 2006. a year, as recommended by the Committee, Mr. HUME said it was difficult for the Committee to satisfy all parties. However, if the Hon. Member bad attended to the proceedings of the Committee he would find that this individual had no reason to complain. .He (Mr. Hume) had no doubt that if Mr. Collet chose to retire to morrow the Sergeant -at-Arms would get as good a man to, perform tho duties for 1001. a year. Mr. WIGNEY said that if the sense of the House was against him, he would not press his motion. Mr. ESTCOURT moved "that the annual sum of 7781. be allowed to Mr. John Bellamy, the deputy-housekeeper, during the time he shall continue to perform the duties of his office, in lieu of all salaries, fees, gratuities, and emolu ments whatsoever ; and that the annual sum of 300/. be allowed to him for the servants requisite to keep the House, the committee, and other rooms, passages, &c., clean," Mr. HUME said the resolutions of the Select Commit tee were in his opinion the best rule for the guidance of the House. Sir R. INGLIS supported the amendment. Sir J. WROTTESLEY thought it better to abide by the resolutions of the Committee. Sir J. GRAHAM thought it right to abide by the reso lutions of the Committee, and suggested that the salaries, when fixed, should commence on the Ist of January. Tho CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER con curred in the suggestion. _ Mr. ESTCOURT withdrew his amendment, and the resolutions of the Committee were agreed to. The Sugar Duties Bill was read a third time, on the mo tion of the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER. SPIRITUOUS LIQUORS SALE BILL. Mr. GILLON moved that the House should go into Committee on the Spirituous Liquors Sale Bill. He was will ing to agree that the Bill should only apply to liquors not drunk on the premises. Sir G. CLERK would move, as an amendment, that the Bill should be committed that day six months. Mr. BUCKINGHAM seconded the amendment. Mr. GILLON quoted an extract from the report of the Excise Commissioners in support of the Bill. Sir H. PARNELL thought the Commissioners had gone too far in that report, and expressed his regret that the passage had crept in. Mr. HUME and the LORD ADVOCATE sup ported the committal of the Bill. - Mr. PEASE, Sir A, AGNEW, and Mr. WAKLEY opposed it. The latter Hon. Gentleman_ was sure the publicans themselves would object to it, as they preferred the present. ready money system to one which would compel them to give credit or offend a customer. Mr. POTTER supported the Bill. Colonel THOMPSON maintained that nothing would make the people sober but instruction and education. Let them take off the taxes on newspapers, and facilitate the circulation of cheap publications. As for the drunkenness of the lower classes, which the supporters of the Bill wished to restrict, he bade them look to the conduct and frequent intoxication of the higher orders. Sir R. BATESON did not know what company the Hon. Member for Hull kept ; but in the company he kept he never saw any instances of the intoxication spoken of by that Hon. Member. Mr. BROTHERTON supported the amendment. The Hon. Member for Hull had himself shown that education could not prevent drunkenness.—(Hear, hear.) The House then divided, when there appeared— For the original motion For the amendment Majority against the Bill 37 The House then went into Committee on the Civil Bill Courts (Ireland) Bill. Clauses up to 63 were agreed to. On the suggestion of Mr. LYNCH, clause 64 was post poned for amendment, and negatived pro tempore. Clauses 65 and 66 were agreed to. The remaining clauses of the Bill, together with the post poned clauses, were then agreed to. The schedules were then proceeded with. Upon the schedule that regulates the fees of the As sistant Barristers a short conversation took place, Mr. LE.. FROY, Mr. SHAW, and Mr. Sergeant JACKSON contending that the Barrister should be entitled to the fee of one shil ling upon " pronouncing" the decree instead of on " sign ing" the decree, as provided in the Bill. Upon this a di vision took place, when there appeared— For the original provision ........ 43 For the amendment 2l Majority IRISH GRAND JURY BILL. In answer to a question from Colonel PERCEVAL. who urged the inconvenience of proceeding with the Irish Grand Jury Bill in the present session. Lord MORPETH considered the Bill to be of so much importance that it was his intention to press it through as early as possible. Were he to consent to a postponement. the evils which this measure was intended to remedy would remain without correction until 1838. The Committee on the Bill was postponed until Friday next. The other Orders of the Day were then disposed of, and the House adjourned at a Quarter-past One. FEMALE DOMINATION.—The name of the herible of this new satirical novel, by the Authoress of " Mothers and Daughters," is Mrs. Armytage—and thus, it appears, the book is to be called " Mrs. Armytage, or Female Domination." But who is Mrs. Armytage ?—is the question in all circles. We are sorry we cannot venture to satisfy enquirers on this point. We must refer all inquisitors to Mrs. Gore, or to her publisher, Mr. Colburn. DREADFUL DISTRESS.—It is, we think, a stib ject nhich alike calls for astonishment and reprobation, that the Government and the House of Commons have no inten tion during the present session of acting on the Report of the Commissioners of the Poor Law Inquiry, and establishing some system for the permanent relief of those unhappy beings who annually fall victims to the fatal attacks of famine. If further evidence be wanting of the paramount necessity of a poor rate, we are afraid t h e ensuing season is likely to furnish it in. abundance. The prospect which the people have to look for ward to, is truly a ppalling, when the inclemency of the weather, the wintry wi n d, with the accompanying frost and snow, add their horrors to those of hunger; we dare not pause to consi der the result. Most earnestly do we call upon all the friends of the people, both in and out of Parliament, to lose not a mo ment in corning. to their rescue.— Waterford Chronicle. "---'''''''-------__-- (AuvrAtT isE m E NT.)—T. COX SAVORY, Goldsmith , c„ 47, Cornbill, London , informs the Public , that he oilers ,Sc FRUIT KNIVES and FORKS, with DESSERT handles, silve r ferrules, plated on steel blades, at Three Guineas: per dozen Pair, or with solid silver blades, at Eight Gl1111;a3 and aL Half per dozen pair. N. R. Car v ed ivory handles at 13s. 6d. extra per dozen Pair , _ ____--...............r"' ...or! plain ivory BIRTHS. kith inst., at Frimley Hill, Surrey , M rs. Birnie, of a torsson; In nA th r e gYll_ s treet, the lady of G. N. Longden, Esq., of Doc Commons, of a son. On„ the MAIIRIED. 25th inst. at Lamphey, Pembrokeshire, Captain Joini Vc i n iu g el : Laws, R.N. ' to Mary, the only daughter of C. l‘lathias, ' 4.1 T.La.ro he Court, Pembroke, and Old-street House, Glou cestersture, P Y ri,.On tl4 *Oth inst., at St. Pancras New Church, Henry Charles ''l*Pharri, E sq ., of Francis-street, Torrington-square, to Miss Ellen Anne Skelton, of Charlotte-street, Fitzroy-square. DIED. On -4e f7th inst., aged 82, Edward Chapm an, Esq., of Lamb's Conduit. of Red Lion - sq uare, st r eet. On th e inst., William Aleyrick, Esq., Bloomsbury. On the 48th inst., at Sevenoaks, aged 80, Marmaduke Robinson, Esq., of Tedford -place, Russell-square. Londor,_: Printed and Published by MURDO YOUNG, of No 1”, Strand, at The S un Office, No. 112, Strand, in the county 'liddlosex. , I. ii 4 i i.' it; 4 .i .. ;'," '. 4' ti 4 p f l if p j ~ `s :~ ~~ M ~~