The Sun. — London, England, 1810-05-11 00:00:00

wer l 14 TTLETON. OTOIVIVEIi and L'Y The following is a Copy of the correspondence which has taken place between Mr. Roger O'Conner' 411 d Mr. Lyttleton l in consequence of the allusio.nof the latter, in the House, of Commons, to thocounec tion of the former with Sir Francis Burdett :-_ • ' I R• &CONNER'S FIRST LETTER TO MR. LYTTLETON. ‘ " Sir —From a wish that no. personal concern Of mine should be blended with any public transaction 17 ' England, I have forborne, till after the meeting (it the people of WesiminAier,..to address you=--that , ' c 'ver, I feel myself called on- to notice certain ex s.Pressions you are reported tO have made use of res i"cting .ny brother and me, which I cannot credit ; ° ll any authority short of your own. " Should you, contrary to my hope and expeCtal . liol l, have taken the license I allude to, I have onl# t o remark, that ignorant as you are of my Countryi iq family, my brother, and myself, and of all till !acts on which you presumed to ground your opi your conduct appears to me wanton and mis t'llielous----that had your assertions been true, they wer e illiberal—and that your hiving uttered them, t ruly or falsely where you did, the act was base in . 11 extreme. I am, Sir, &c. &c " O'CONNER. " Maddox.street, Hanover.square, April Ir, IS no. rs, Henrietta.strest, Cavendish-square, May 5, iStdi. Sir—Upon my arrival in town this day, a let : 4.1 was ,put 'into my hands, dat.<..d- 1-oth April, in , (ibrsed ' O'Conner,' and signed with the same l'arne, which, instead of being sent to my lodgings, !.. was left at ,the bar of Walier's Club, where it has. rPtnained fur fifteen or sixteen dais . . " This letter, of which I presume you: to be the Writer, complains Of certain_ expressions; which I 4 'll reported to have wade use of tespedingyour brother and yourself. - " The manner &in- which those expressions are-de scribed is so loose and indefinite, that it is:impossible .1 0 enter :into explanation upon the subjetSt—and I must add, that under any circumstances the tope °f the letter would preclude such explanation._ .. ‘i I am, S.r, &c. ‘ 4 WM. HEN. LYTTELTON." 411••••••••11.0 • " Sir-I received _ your letter of the sth 1nt.71 /esterday, and that the present communication may 1 riot he loose :or .indetinite ; I have to observe, that I Yob are reported 'in The Parliamentary Debates to to, have represented me as a I).ison'urtfil pr the so . _ J.I~IPEF L 1 L PARL IJIENT 110(75'1,' OF PEERS, THURSDAY, MAY 10. , The House, in - . a Committee of Privileges; was for a length of time employed in hearing Counsel on • the, claims to the Baubury Peerage,. and the Judges Attended- to deliyer their opinion - on a point of law. Several private Bills were broug,lit op from the Commons, and read a first time.' Lord BORRINGDON moved for a number of Papers relative to the late Campaign in 'Spain and Por. tugal.. The MarqUis WELLESLEY Could not• exaaly. . see the necessity of producing the pipers called for by the Noble Lord. It 'would occasion much trouble to. prepare . them; but that should be no reason with, him for 'objeding to the motion of the Noble Lord. . The papers were accordingly ordered. The Bills on the Table were forwarded in their respealive stages, after which the House adjourned. HOUSE OF COIVMONS, THURSDAY, MAY 10. PETITIONS FROM READING. Mr. &meth , / said, he held in his hand a Petition which he was happy to be able to state to the House was couched in terms very different from those which 'had been - presented of •late. While stating their complaints, the petitioners did not forget the respea .due to the House.- They allowed the House to possess not only the right of committing their owu Members, bin also that of dealing so in certain case& with strangers. They appeared to feel, after hearing the able discussion which had ,taken place in that House on the subject, that whatever might be their opinion of the proceedings of their representatives ) while their doors are open to Petitioners, they ought not to be approached, insult. Petitions - .drawn up like that which he held in his hand,, would,-. be hoped, always be received .by that House, The `Petitioners dolibted, whether if to commit an offen titer Was not wrong in itself, the House ought, in' a cake of iinelis to proceed in any way •but by a trial ,by Jury: They probably were not aware that the ilduse had no organ of its ownby-which a prosecu tion could be commenced; that they could only-ap-. .ply ; to. the Crown for the,aid pf the Officer of the Crown, and that. if his services, were granted by the • Member f -•• Crown, , bringing soon a ea - se before a - Vury, would eeet,y of Sir Francis- Burdett or any. o your . . .- . , , ._ in faLt be abandoning their privileges to a July: Of -I ."cir4ament. • vial. by Jury he would .:IwayS skak with the greatest i '` The toni of my former letter_Was . the'Ro46 - , Itlence of -I - b printed' -.. 1 iitqn the i.' respec t and admiration. It was, as it tle a over,- port—vk. let • - ,--- ,had justly ! e7.5i1 1.,, , et) . called, the palladiom of our•rights; but if a to • • ' , . • ne ii to be , lowered. or ra:seo, must 'entfilir i "J'ury sh9uld be_called upon to decide on'such a case; rend upon . yOnfself, as f feel myself bonniicT c n, dour and honobr not to take the Teport . irzi 4c lapon any aUthoriq hUt your own. " My,letter*.is left at - your olub-hobse, because could not kart' !here, or any whete else, the 'Place of your res!dence. . " I am, Sir, &c. &c. • " O'CoNNEa." Faddox.sirett, Hanover-square . ; Mat 7. May, 7, ato. . , " Sit—l hive received your letter of this day's • date, ih which you state,.that,l have heett reported tri the Parliamentary Debates to hate represented • You as a person " unfit fur the society of Sir Fiancis Burdett or any Member of Parlianic,nt." Althunglt I can never 'consent to consider my responsible .for expressioOs alleged to love been used by. me by the Reporters bf Parliamentary De bates, yet feel no . objection to say, that I never ina e use of thole expressions. "it is impoSsible for me to recollect . , at this distance of time,, the exact words used by me in the debate to Which you' allucle ;. ; but in order to • convince you that I have no disposition to dfsavovv slay sentiments' which I may have expresseirip :Par- 9 Lament, I shall not hesitate to state the.stitAii4e of *hat I said, Whenever am req4ested to d 4, So in a • manner which can justly be considered as .itife)tcpp tionable. Lain, Sir, &c. " W. H. LYTTLETON." e yoir did — not . apply the expressions to toe the Report of which in the Parliamentary De bates was offensive to me, and under which im- Aresston my correspondence with you cornineOidl?' do not feel myself authorized to call upon You tor , !. auY further explanation. ' • ' •,"- "I am, Sir, &c. O'Cox-sit tlal f 8, a to. • Yesterday morning; at six 'o'cloek-, a desperate battle was fought in Shoulder* of Mutton Field,, Hackney, between a coachman of the -name of Stubbs, and a journeyman bakei-; near Kingsland, tiatued White-, for twogtlineas a side, when the con . test was sustained with cepa]; courage fin fitly tni tlutes, hard fighting, but at length- the baker : gm - 9 u P to the su i erior strength of his antagonist; being ti lmost blinded in both eyes:. The combatants were • conveyed to their respeetive habitations by their. Itiends, very much bruit., d. Clot: for 2,lleforrn; others, Vesicle 'electors, on such - hn'occasion ought to be lee in (0 make the;r :plaint, as those wilb exercised the electit - e franchise Could hardly be expected, to, C , implain. He woni.i not enter into the question as to liteflp - m.„tilltht: con tended that the right- of petitions..; for 'a .fteform was in effect almost taken away, if none but elec tors were suffered to Petition the House on the sub ject. 7 • Ur. St mcthsr, in ekpianation, said; that though he was sorry the Constitutional Body on all °cc:l4'l6 l 'os called on others, he did not deny That - every yidu4 had, the right Of petitioning at the Bdr of th,lt HoUse. The Petition was then brought up, and .aftei few wnrd's from Mr. Ward and Mr. SbawLefevre, ordered.to lie on the table. • On' the motion of Sir J. Nrcot,i,, certain papers on the table of the House, relating to• the Baiiic convoy, were 'ordero to be printed. Mr: WnAilTON'obtained leave to bring in a Bill for 'preventing fiauds exporting froru one part of the United Kingdom to the other. The Aberdeen, Harbour Bill was read a third time, and !vassed. _ _ 'LONDON DOCK BILL. The third reading* of-the London Dock Rill being moved, Mr. H. THORNTON OppOSeci it, on the grounds that sufficient'compensitionwas not Irropo,ed be given to those who might sustain injury in conse quence pf,,the belng passed: He wished the third readingof.the Bill should be adjoarned fora few days, as the Chancellor of the,. ll.sx.cheglier jiigqd not made up his mind- on the subject.; and conclud ed by moving; that the debate 5' , ...0u1d be adjourned to Monday next • • • The .CfrAtsipEL,Lort. of the EXCHEQUER had rio objection to the adjburnment 'of the debate till Mon day,.:butdid not think he '02.4.1,1d make up his mind on so difficult a question by that time. THORNTON proposed postponing it for a longer period. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER could not imMediately gi‘e,the subject his attention. • Sir THOMAS Tun - ToN- thought it would be well to adjourn it for a 19nger period. The Chan cellor •of the Ettchequer had an erroneous idea of the subjeet. The compensation originally given was not sufficient, and now nearly a million was to be added to the capital, it mist complete -the rain of the individuals to whoin the former compen sation was granted, unless a-compensation boas now given in proportion to the increased capital of the company. He hoped the debate' Would be ad journed, and that the Chancellor -of the Exche quer would in the interim turn his mind to the sub ;eat. Mr. MARRYATT was of opinion the original ca pital was inadequate to the charges of the.concetn. ~ itl -t fazed pronounce that to be nolibei which that ..House '. He thought the capital ought to be increased, that yi l - Ye s ,had , ,pronounced to be a libel, ,toe verdict of a Jury ' they [night Complete their works, by which the.pub :would be set aboye the decision of apt Hothe.. The • lie would he benefited. - He - thought 'a sufficient opinian of a Jury of twelve men' would, be set - above . coespensetion had been granted, and that they would that of 650 Members of that House:" The decision be very bad pliblic stewards if under all the circum.i. of those who from their wisdoas and talents had been stances of the case they granted more. chosen to-represent the people would be.disregarded, : Mr. ROSE made a few ObOervatious ,on the sub= - arid that of a Jury, consisting of 12 Men, Set above jeer. • . .;. an. How the petitioners, w h o r e p o s e d so much : Mr.,WHITBREAii th ought the Ziebatd ought to be .confidence in • the - 'House; who .trusted all . that ' adjonrned, but he objected to.the Bill altogether.--= was most dear to them to ,their RepreseetatiVes, ' it the statements w Welt helield in his hand were true ; should feel such apprehensions of the e:ser- and he did not know that any they contained had me or anc‘i a power; In :a - case so - rare, by those :' been contradieteil, the power ofelie - c,oropany ought in whom they had•such confide n c e , he didnot know. ' not to be increased but rather abridged . ; He tie- He concluded by S tating the petition to come from derstood that they charged inditiduals most exorbis eespeciable characters, whose motives he belieied to tent sums, and: when actions had been brought the be good. • against them, agreed to submit the point at issue to ' Mr. SHAW LEFEVEIt seconded the Petition. He , arbitration, and then departed frOm the agreement • , defied the most fastidious.person to find fault with again referred the platter to arbitration and acted the terms in which it was couched. It was voted the same part ,again,' This was stated in a petition at , a Meeting called by. the Mayor of Reaslioks,which to that HoUse. Other complaint's ' against them, was numeryosly attended, and at which the Petitiou equally strong, Were contained in a memorial pre e Was unanimously car r i e d. On the matter of the Pe- • sented to the Lords of the Treasury, which he read titiob, he might take another opportunity of express- to the Boase. He did not wish the.COmpany t o b e . ~ ing his sentiments. condemned, on what he had advanced ; but, .atsall The Petition was then brought up, and read by events, the debate ought to he adjourned; to give the the Clerk. It was, as described by the Hon. Mem= CoinPany time to clear themselves from these charges, her, couched in very respeClful terms, and conclude or afford the House an opportunity of doing- justi c e ed praying • f or the discharge of Mr. Gale Jones.— to . them. Ordered to lie on the table, i Mr. MANNING doubted the truth of these charges, , . Mr., Strew LEFEVRE stated; that at that very I, butlf - the Cliargei.eouldheprOi74l : he should be ready meeting another Petition had been voted, which had to join with the, Hon. Gentletnatato prevent the re been transmitted to him to present to the House currence of such grievanees: If - the Hon. Gentle . The Petition whi c h he held in . his hand c a ll e d f or a man 'stionld move for a Committee to investigate th e '-Reform in,_Parlinnent,, complained of the'present subjed, he would be ready to second the motion.-- .;krepresentation of the people, as being inadequate— He then spoke of the purposes to which the sum alluded to the melancholy . circumstances of last ,j proposed to be added to the capital was proposed year; and to the words of the Speaker on the :sob- j to be appropriated, 'and concluded by supporting `jeef of the purity of election. 'lt complained, that the motion for the third.reading„of the Bill. .too. many ,placemen and pensioners.hatseatsein. that ' Mr. W. SMITH thought such enormous injustice House -that Parli -lent-was of too long duration, t bad been done throegh_aenisconstruttion of the M.l, and swished triennial Parliatnent4 to be restored. It ; that the case of those wh?' - complained ought to be concluded praying fOr such Ref orm as, would restore ; re-consdered. The condo a q the Londnn Dock the HoOse to the confidence,. 6f the ns w ti6n, and make C o mp an y h a d be en suc h,. t h at he knew. they had it 'what' it is' considered by the Constitution -e-the , or- paid 7501. tax. costs on actions brought again s t them, .. gan,,of thepeople. ' to recover not more than 2001. rather than go to trial. , Mr. Stmeoi t. observed; that the requisition had , This he could prove-frem documents which-he held called on all the inhabitants to attend the meeting. ; in his hand. These sums were no sooner paid thin lii consequence, themeeting was not entirely coot- . they resulted to their old ,praalices, hut charged more - pcised of those - tvll,o paid scot and lot—oftliose VvLho.. than,befere. 11c-cause it had been admitted that the were in tea the-foundation of that House.. It Areas - ' chsyk,es..at, present made might in a f ew i years be with, the fashion for those who had constituti ona lly a righi • to at tend, who '. Pr()Pr?a:Y increased, they thought themsel v e s a t li to tisch,a meeting to invite others herty„itse raise them immediately, and departed'' in had not' t hai political importance So give their 'salie-' :. May .from those rates, which had beeh se t t l e d i n tion or reprobation to the acts of th e ir r e p resen t a , APril by arbitration. He then adduced several . in fives.- 'lt was a'sort of suicide in those who had the stances of their extortions acid stated the law Charges elective franchise to call on others, beeaose it an- which they have been obliged to pay to ' have swered their purposes. for the moment, -to carry amounted (in the whole) to 40001. He was dist certain resolutions, which were 'hardly.,known t o posed to oppose the Bill altogether, but of the but at present he . any one but the individuals who dr ew t h e m u p, an d shouldcertainly vote for the postponement had them' cut and dried _ready to be passed, unani-l- eibir4) . w mousey as it as called,..that is, .without disc u s s i o n,' . L.4ir. reading. . E. i..'NATCHBIII i t, agreed in the necessity of .by intimidating those who might wish to oppose J . P9stPonenlePt! , fpr the purpose of introducin g the :them, as it went to give their .power to others.— clause. He hoped the Hotise.would haVe no objec e Though they were bound' to protect the lowest . Ition, as-.the period was so short. equally with the highest, this system was in hiseispie t Mr. :IAWKINS BROWNE thought that the charges nion most mischievous, mid would be productive of were delayed too long ; they were. of such a iia bad consequences if it went on, and the multitude , tore, that even if the Bill was not. thOught of were suffered to increase and overpower the voice they ought 'to have been prockiced.' t The sum of the ConstitUtional' Body.' With these obset ea-. , proposed, he was convinced, was not more than fleets he seconded the motion ; not binding himself : adequate.', I , to give the / Petition am farther support. • ;''• I. - Mr. WniTna.E-An did not : believe that next Mon .-'Mr, ~.. W , OOD trnnderstoo d last Speak.6r to say.t . , 11 q; :i ~ day, woula atrmi:suflicient time.• lie rather tho ugh t Constitutional Body, the Electors, had alone the { Li t. would be necessary. to postpone it to, Monday right of addressing•that House. ".l.'hat was Llll4pubt ! . - s o'nnight, :He said that there was a Gentleman in edly the case where the: acts of- their representatives, L the.-lobby by .Whose authority he had .it in his power were the sub j ect- of their &liberation, but or nO7 to contradict the accusation of the mixed nature of other occa,"ion. If the, s people had a ri&ht to Yeti- , th e c h arges . . ---. ..„ Mr: ts.Mcott , '7 !^, , 4 ;*. 11` , 11Se; niore ititd1•••;:11 , e the. _people ini ; ;111 !Tilly a word, th gn:at end t... tl to be private intert.st; winch tt wt‘.6 tiic dut) 1 - louse ttil?roient, • .7 W:dSt • . :.•.' In I~1r; MANNING 7thcP;i4it, .that if the Uorn . rnitte6 was revived,*.it ought to beunshack.u.. MI. ACOBS said Ina' this question, deserved -thq mature consideiition of the House . ; he would them• fore cote for its pOstpout meta. . . , A d'Ai3ion was thtn called for ) when tbei:e . ap peared, Fur the postpozietr.ent it _ . - 35 • Maiority - • The, - Bitvai then, of cburse, read a third. time and pflpsed - ; = _ • A messlge frpm the Lords announced their asp 1 ,, • sent to several private Bilis. SMITHFIELD MARKET, MAY If. , This day's Market had' a pretty good supply of differem kinds of Cattle; MUtton and Veal are cheap er than our last report; Beef, 'POrk, and Lamb, support last prices ; and the trade for the cost part was but indiffercni.—TlieT sales in the Hay. Market were trifling ; Hay _fetched last price; Straw and . Clov.er have got up in price.—The jug prices and numbers are an accurate statement : •To sink the offal ker stone 91 - .Blb. beef js. od. to 6s. 4d. Mutton ss. od. to 6s. ad. _Veal, is• 8 d to 7s. cd. Pork ss. od. to 7s. ocr. Lamb 6s.td. to od. Beasts 870. Sheep and Lambs 4,700. , ,CA). yes 3 . 00. rigs 29 0 . • SMITHFIELD HAYMARKET. flay 41. os, od. to 61. ins. od. Straw I. od. 1 . 6•11.- I °S. od. Clover 61. os. od. au 71. los. CORN-EXCHANGE ; MAY . 1 I,—The market to=day leas not many fresh arrivals of Wheat, but fine sate. • Pies are a trifle dearer ; B,:rley and .Malt fully sup , port their priers ; White Peas likewise ; but few Beans of the two kind , and thosesomewhat lakher ; £ew Ticks 38s. to 445. p er - quarter ; Oats are i n s'''ort Ripply, and dearer ; • Flour remains at late prices. )1 Cart. d 0:4 gar , many prO. just 1 1 our twat •• r. ~i, Ili feC* pd ice. i n. Pa . from . A 5, MO' Were ~ , ster" • tar• sELL , iirst. and t bad Miss ) nsti' oral' o l was ds t last e did d, op d br 11l it - , Oh rcirs, sskb in a giant BAI V the r op' of f, ortes i s $0 hafr tate§ fiver hi. non/ ke oold rail' the butt then SIR F. BURDETT. The SPAt2,lt said that he had to acquairit the House, that he had been - served with a process by Sir F. Burdett, which,,if it was the i'ileasure of the House, would be read. , The Clerk then .read the process, which was notice of an active in the Court of Zing's Bench; the damages of which were laid at 30,0001. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER took the opportunity of tating, that the ;Report of the Com ruit'ed on -the notices Of Sir: F, Burdett, would be ready to-morrow to lay before the 1-iouse.fieftuov ed that this notice might likewise be referred to that Committee. - The SPEAKER, before ihe.question *was put, had Jtkewrse t:;acquainf the House, that the Seueant had been, served with, another- process. It was moved by the CHANCELLOR of the'Exottg. , QUER, t hat this should also ,bercferred. -• Sir T. T.URTON did'not oppose the motion' of ferring the notice to the ComMittee. • .' Mr. WHI'EBREAD was of. opinion that the notice should nut go to the. Committee, without first pass., ing tbraugh the House. The HO - use shottld not so totally abandon itself.. He apprehended it would be the proper mode of proceeding to call the•Ser,. jeant to .the Bar, to state the'particulars. He asked the - Right-Honourable Gent!mar) opPosiie, if he' Tinterided , That -the Report should be- taken into consideratiowon the same day on which it was. pre-. pared: The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that it would nut be irteguizi to. refer this notice to .the Committee 4: when the.Repott would come. be:- . fore'the House, then. it would be expedient to tak6 it into Consideration. • Mr. WHITBREA . D'obServed, that he had expressed no opiniotl, on this Sohjea. 'The Srje r ant was then called to - . the' Bar. He Stated -that' -bad received the.noti6: this morning from an Officer of the court. The Clerk then read the process; which was a notice of 'a declaration befog filed in the Court of Kioes Bench by Sir F. Burden, against Fran Col man; Esq. • . • • On the motion of the CHANCELLOR of the Ex- CHEQUER, both the notices, were rcferleci to ;be Committee. MADRAS: Mr. PRENDERGAST gave notice, that ho would, Ou'rfuesday - se'llnitti, move for the p,tod.,Ltion some papers :el.riteto ttle:ailltir,s of :,iadra.i. STAMP OFFICE 'Mr. WIIITIIREAD gave notice, that he would, on Monday next, move, that tier be' I.,id fore the House, Copies of Coiresp.:idene-.1 be tween the Heads of the Treasury and Stamp Office, relative to- the regulations which bad .hcen so long in agitation. • - CAPTAIN FOSKETT. purduant to notice, rose to motfe for the produaion of certiin• papers_ relatit4 to Cap= . taint Foskett. His anxiety on the sUbjeat did . not flow from fears for the fate of hiS 'motion ; but if he had . - rty, it was becauie -an illustriouS perSonage was implicated.; -When he first introduced this "sub= jea,. it -was .not with the intentiOti•of creating litary discussion in the• House; the grounds he aa..' ed on he had well examined. He had 'wished the House lolenforcea standing law, not to make a -DOW - one. -Having -gone- thui far, he -would npt again have come forward, had not aspersions - been, cast on the'pharaaer of Captain Foskett by Gentlemen-au the other side °fate House.. He now conceived it ta•beJ44nty to Captain. Foskett and to an illustri ous. personage, to call for official proofs of those ac cusations; The papers he held in his, hand were • cotiiplete..-.;.-irivas• not his intention to enter into their military charaeter—their authority was well ground.; ed.—On the merits of the case he had no diSposition to descant; the papers he only intended lo use a 4 • defensive weapons• to•proteet the - charaCier of Cap tain Foskett from the . .wanton attacks which . had been made. •He intended them for no other nee ;. he therefore 'moved, 'f that there should .be laid be- fore the House copies of mmorials and other papers .frotn• Captain Foskett, of the 15th Light Dragoons, • to the offices of the Commander in Chief and Adju , . Cant-General, from May 4, 1800, t o F e b ruary 14,, 1810; and also the various answers to the same." SUTTON -observed, that thoiagh he agreed with the Honourable Gentleman in the manner- he Ind introduced his motion to the House, still he . thought he had not advanced 'sufficient grounds for the introdudion of those papets., which were-of such a nature as probably to be produalive of mischievous consequences. When the petition. was *first prel.. sented to the House, he conceived its only object to' be to charge the Commander in Chief with a direct : breach of the law. If persons disappointed in . pro= 'motions were thus allowed to appeal to the Hews and ransack the offices of State,' .it would go to a subvetsion of the sj stern under which the ArMy is -now so properly condualed,.and in' the end produce ,great awl general mischief. If these papers were only for the phrpose of - elucidating the Articles of War, they should be produced ;-*but as it was impos;• sible,twanake things • clearer than they were, he did notrsev. any occasion for introducing them. The first complaint in the petition is of .a junior being prornoted before a senior officer. This Was redress ed ; that too,- Of not being sent- to Spain, was cn the point of being redressed, when the tegitnent it= came home. With . respect to not being -pro- - .meted in • 809, the Colonel,of the regiment cannot be blamed- for withholding what he had not; indeed,. he thstpght- it Hardly possible for: any yerson to say tha.t promatiO was a matter of right; that length. well vcrt ate , 2 .3 t Mfr• r. ; ; ) i Oil • o lds,. les °I orld , king 133f . ' ,31-1,, oot; :O a title `~ 1 1.:.