The Sun. — London, England, 1809-02-02 00:00:00

TII‘NKS TO BRICADtErk CEVERAL FARE. • The.Seznxitn—(addiessing General Vane, Who att.2nded in liis,place; iti full uniform)—" Brigadier- Fane, upon the late expedition to Portugal, yonr . good fortune to hold a distinguished com lir!!;1 in the British Army, and to pi•ri . irtri eminent your country, in the bayles wbich were ;ht with the French arttheS you'were, hposed. The issue of such battles could .not be tJuhttol when British courige:and discipline were ,li'lgaged. When the battles. of Roleia and Viiniera -,re,ruentioned, and often they be Mention with enthusiasm and ridMiration, your heart may .gloW, that on these glorious Occasions your sword was riot.draWn in 'vain.: 'together with him. Who fought by. your side, your name will be recorded in rtie annals Of military renoWn. 'Tis true that Gene , 1111 Anstnither has been taken away, in the course of hotnan events, and is now:far. beyond Our thanks; lAit his name will live in the sad and grateful re t: entbrancc of his' country. In the name of the Conn - Mins of the United Parliament of Great Bri t,iin, I tm direrited 'to return you their thanks for tte condu6t you ,displayed, and the gallant egploits YOU Oerforrned in these battles, when the honour of your eohntry Was So proudly sustained." • General Lt)tsur expressed, in few ,words, the deep sense he entettainettpf the hpnour Which had bee n. die him, which he felt as a British soldier ought to 'h Vote of Thanks was ordered to be entered on the Journal:, LIEUT. GEN. M'KENZIE FRAZER, AND lIRIGA. al ER GENERAL. FA ME. '_ Se OAKtit again addressed General 'nine, and GetieratOmier who sat by. the-side of his brother in artus, in full uniforto." The deep grief felt , by the iiiC,r) nation:, for: five loss of, that .great and gal lant Orlicer, Sri . John Moore,. who tell gloriortsly fighting the battles of Iris country at Curunna, is in wine degree mitigated by the retie6tion that she pos sesses many.great un:l gallant officers .who have trod in his steps,' and imp<itient to emulate his glory. In that hat yon hold a most distinguished place; and I. am •mnnnanded by the United•Connuons&e. toi , return you thanks for your exemplary:modaf, and . valiant exploits on that by,- which evinced -the su periority of British trookiii, over the most renowned in the modern history, of the world. That day in Whielt superior nutnbers were completelY over thrown, and :the .f.tritislif..arrarenabled to prob4l: in the face of a *disheartened 'and defeated foe, who thirst . not, with treble the amount of force, again ventrlre to attack them." General filtAzejt expreAsed.hii gratitude for the great hOnour that had been done him (but in so low. alone .Ot voice, that *e 'eould not Anforiein the yreciie words) ; and tho vote *as ordered to be re - - corded. SIR SAMUEL HOOD. TIIC SPEAKER (addressed Sir gitltlUSlt. H - 0013, who also appeared in his place) -" The varla6. brit nt services, which hat;e long marked the splen 7 dld career Of your naval glory:, have already wade; you known in the annal 3 of your country. Your late great and 51.itfcrl c ....:!;•cos at (;ortnina, have called forth fur 11,1)11110 and grmitude; and I aril cornmanded to communicate In yrin the Thrtalts oftltis liotise for yokir IterOCC4 ort th;it ncc contributed So Uludh tC) the 51Ift.t eixiimilc ntiOn of the British Forces, and their return to their • twtiye land." fir S A M fir) , ,Wl returned his most 'sincere and Watclurthanks to•• the Houser for the bottom t ht 7 itsid cooferred upon 'him, ;and to the Speaker for the voly haod;otoe manner in \%hich he had corn tnunicate,l i; to him. 1)(itli;• staiioned 'at 'Co mma bad ooly afforded him an 000rtunity of doing itildat)i, and titoogh 'on this account the honour wag Ettore than Ire merited, he yet hopt'd the tribute of applause from hint cOuntry would .itt-ecalate him to attious Which would better IneriffliAt hit;ll Mark of their approbation. • • • . Mr. cANNINC presented Copit,i . olThe Lytle!. from Mr. Pinckney to him, and of the Letter ad-nr.Assed by : him UT Mr. Pinanoy, which - wet , : ordered tJ 1W on the table, and, to tae printed. • On the Motion of Mr. APO!, a new Writ wa s I 'ordered to , C't hi usued for thi - ...' 13 0r04) of Aylesbury, in the tooni, of the Honourable George Cavendish, deceased. •• Sir S. Rosma,7 hroti3ht in a Bill to extend the Ata, 32 GO.ll. hi versolls fqr.Mo 'ley, not picl pursuant to ordeil of ,Onutt.s.of Equi ty, which was read a Inst., and oaltired in'be read a acConcl tittle. on Vriday. g:tye itotir that :he would, on this (LT .week,, surge 14,r le ave. to bring it) ti gill re -1.11 io'hay Courts Ntx.:tial.. it waii looded tile princivlFs bo:;1w ! ..1 cwlained to tin: F-li; k lse, last SCpSibit, and ‘i'ltich tie tilloulul not now.EtTt!:l!. CANNE:IO 1110ved th.it an bumble Adctress be prchented to his i\laj,ty, I;r3yiug, that it Letter ad dresied by'. hint to N11 . ..1(111my tthe Member ~for Poole) cpp ontaining bis aointment to the Office of Consul ( . ;(yner,ll for Pori (T i n!, shriold be. kid tha "Muse 'rho flight !lefts. ti“:retary stated that. titi3 Letter would show the grOttituN ou which the allow ances for tees had been grauted.—Agreed TILE PUKE (L YORK. Air. 'WAR ra.e, moved (he order of, the day for the loose resolving into a Coinwittee,.to investi gate the chitrges,brooght his . Royal Highness, orch.l (wing, ,re4(l, !R . .; kllie \Vila into the Cotumittee—Mr. Whaton uJI thi.: Chair. Mr. W Ajt beg:;ca Jc,tpc to,cdil the attention of tho Commiitee to some observiaions which had ntatlia on the leading, points in his charge. He trusted that the part Ire hod tali7,cii i I 40011 open ; 3 1 4 candid ; such as ought not to httvc exposed hint in cerilure rod iivtinumion, I,le had Lever wished to liee hack any thi,n/j, tuid God knew lie had Wined to 1)rt11g 11 chargc! i'ipinst the l)uke Loi or any ruiut„ T4t,: rai n that bad neve, made On vvl;:it hcid talten froin bitu in pro. tarring his oLargr., wct•e4iwicrort Laic:444l.lhr. All Le did wns to: maud forward in his place .as the nett el the Gamitt;icr ipcioing this he ‘. t think itittictelf Irtble to linst.: varks. !ridsing to do with th , ,T liceotioulriessof the h and no ftian •(wind less de foie bit:). if kvannspirlicy existed of iironswick, it becolie those to follow it o r by ihrow it ow. fur tlrr. purpose :,;141 who had stood tor.' if they had beet) ~,:; hare been very dif a.. ', r ~~~ 2~.~ 1,1 - 1 ':'J . ~ .: ~i~' ~,. ferent from what they were. Tky *mild have !elf , - v fered corruption to '`o' eti:incieibing till it ended in rum, and 1101 fls . he fail e, emit forward to step, f ifeib Check, end, if possi le, deStroy it. He then noticed what had fallen from'an Hon. and Learned Gentle man (Mr. Adam) on a former occasion. That Gen- tlenian had Said, that during an intimacy of the most unreserved description fox twenty:years with- the Duke of 1 ork l , he could venture to take upon himself to say that some of the trensAions alluded to by hirn (Mr. W.) could- net, have taken place without his )cnoWledge, and that they were therefore false. tie' bould tell .that Hon. Gentleman, and could preye 14. the 4onse, that pecuniary teanSattiona to a much kreater extent than any he had mentioned were on foot witliOnt his knowledge; and had liid to the breach which to*_ place between his Royal High ness and Mrs. Clarke. He 'was aware of the . diffi tallies lie'had 6) - encounter, and that it was the di rest interests of many Members in that House to lean to the Commaeder in Chief. Yet be was sure they Would do their' duty, and that the Public had every feasonte rely OD their honeur and integrity. :He had already staled his charge, and now, throwing himsellon the Kruse Or any necessary indulgence, Would proceed to call witnesses- to substantiate that charge. M Hon. Gentleman Air. 'rot= as the entieman that he had not by any Means alluded personallyto hiM in What be said respeeting a conspiracy against the il lastrious, Family. of Brunswick, and the prevalence of the diabolical . principles of jaeobinism in the breasts of those infamous tnep, at whom his indig nation was pointed. On the contrary, he had as• surer! the Hon. Gentleman that he thought him en titled to the thanks of the • House and Country, ter bringing those long disseminated ticusation3 before a tribunal in a tangible shape. • Mr. Wattnt.t; then cimimenced his proceedings, by reading from the Gazette :• ". tiOth July, 1808- 66th Wegiment, Lieutenant-Colonel Knight, to be Major of the sth Dragooos, vice Brooke, who ex changes." 'This bemg , put in; the first witness,'Dr. Andrew thynne, was talka and examined .by the Prosecutir, who previouly.declared that DrThynne was unknown to hiM, andjliat he had had no cinn municatien with hiM an .the subjeet. • [ D u r i n g the following examination, a great de , , of discus stoit took pl,.ce telative to the Propriety or impropriety of certain questions; the proper mode of .examining, Zee. 46c. which we have thought it unnecessary to detail.) EXAMINATION OF DR. THYNNE:IO. Q. Did you attend Mrs. Clarke, in 'your 'pro.- fessionateapacity„ in the month of July, 1130.;--- A. I attended Mrs. Clarke for seven or eight years, and cannot be particular as to the time specified in the.quest ion. Did yottever apply to Mrs. Clark© to promote an exchange between Lieutenant Colonel Knight and Major Brooke ?—A. 1, did. , The application was made at the request of my,old .friend,. Mr. Robert Knight, brother to Lieqt.-Cia. Knight,. and in order, to oblige him, 1 spoke ,to Mrs. Clarke to expedite the exchange. • Q. What passed on this occasion, between ;you ,and Mes. Clarke ?—A. I made an offer of 2001. to Mrs. Clarke, as I llrtd been anthorised to do. Q. 00 what event was that stnn offered ?—A.To in!lucp her expedite the exchange in a certain (sew. To 'remove SC)IVZ itupeditueuts and de by which Mr, a: Knight expeeted were in the way.' ThrOugh what medium was- Mrs. Claike ex pedled to do I cannot answer. I delivered the Message with which I was entrusted.. The roe diurn, I believe, is pretty well known. ,Was it not from her conneOion with, the Duke of )!ork that it was expe&ed she could have any influence in this tnattex 61 course, if Mrs. Olittki3 Wal not CXpetteci to.be able to expedite the excitaiv, Ole woldd nut lave been applied, I°' GI. How many days elap&e.d between the applica tion to Mrs. Clarke and the.appearanc e of the' ex cipnge in . the Gazette ?--4. I cann o t reco ll e d the Inatterquacle little inipreiiiion on my mind : believe the exchange 4vas a good deal expedited by M. Q. \Vai it in a f(14.4 , (lays nr . n week , I. am ito a ,nor'sitive; it tniglit be i.t 'a fortnight or. three , a. Did Mrs. Clarke communicate the Gazette to• you ?- 7 -A. She . sent the Gazette to mcr,• and I int, mediately sent' it to the parties; Ito motley ever passed through city hands. Q. Did 414 r..llobect Knight alone authorize you, or was Lieut:-Col. Knight' a party in giving this authority ?—A. I, was tole! ) , in by Ur. Ito. bert , Knight, who was my old'friend, and had been my Otient for a long tin: I knew little of his brother. Q. 'Vas Licnt..Colonel KuOtt prcient when you was anthor4ecl to, otkr the f.):001. ?•--A, T cannot' tell, 1 met' Mr. Itohert Knight often by himself, 4ild sometimes in company with his brother. Q. (liy Sir F. Burdett.) Did. yoU request Mrs. Clarke to apply to the Duke at York to expedite the exchange in consequence of herreceiving the 2001. --A. Tice thin„t , -is understood wouid not have applied to Mrs. Clarke unless she had possessed the necessary means. „ , Q. What wore the means you understood she possessed [Here, on the motion of Mr. lisca.trAwn, the williess WWI ordered to withdraw; and inter stating the ill utfeas likely to arise from receiving such an• swers as the 'witness- gave, the Hon. Gentleman moved that the Chairman tiltouldbes requested to desire Pr. Tbynne in, future to Confine Isis answsxs' to his own knowledge of 18611, and tint to g":, Itito sutmi.es. This being agreed to, Dr. Thymic wits again called, and, admonished to that cfrua by the Chairman.] , Question repeated.—A. it ivas understood at the time the had sumo infAulice with a great per. surrage,__ Q .- . (fly Sir F. Burdett.) ,Did you not apply.to Mrs. Clarke to ask the Duke of York to expedite the exchange ?—A. I did. Q. Was the 2001. ()tiered for that pnrpose A. For that sole purpose. Q. Was the name of the puke of York men tioned in this conversation IA i tit Mrs. Clarke ?—A. cannot say. _ _ Q. (Ili SirJ. 11011,) Who did yhn mean whin yon fiail Atrs. Chile had some influence with 'a great personage ?--A. The Commander in Chief of course. (a. (By Mr. Wnrillt..; At the time the exchange (I , Not l'jru A a:, stand! un Saturday ty rat:Like w;ig. 9 ottdll or, tfkl . yon gib any tiling in writing t ) Mrs. Clarke ?—A. T lid, I 'gave bet the nhtttes of the parties on a slip of paper«,. I eixiter wrotithent down, or else title did,it herself. Q. (By Sir T. Turton.) At anritubseque4 time did Mrs. Clarke say she had applied to the Duke of Yolk on this busineSs The sending the Gqititte is lilt 1-k ttew-ttbeti t • it: , . • C 4,. Did Mrs; Clarke ever say the exclmnire W 33 accomplished by her meads Mrs, compahled the Gazette with a Ncrte, trrsay-tlie"n change was .accomplished; that she aVasTigoing out of town in.a day or two ; and that the cool. would he very convenient. 0, Was there any thing more in :fl le Note than, what you have now stated ?---A, i cannot That Is all I know at 111'6 distance trine, as the iP . i.itte ' r made little impression on aly Mind: • • a. since. that .tittle has l Trti. Chrki..•.commoni cated any thing to,you on the subje4.i,, itEit the ex 7 change was produred by herineans has never said any thing - . I i.k.thit know Of, .any such communication. • , U. Have you preserved the Note ?L-A. NJ, 1 sent it with the Gaiette to the patties. U. (By Mr. Crolwr).—l-lavc you any means be sides your Own %utilise In suppw,e, that the exeliane WAS expedited by the interletuacc .Mts. Chiikc ? —A. I understood the exchange. was obtained in a regular way, but Mrs. Clarke-wasAn use her itttlu- • ence to expedite it. , . Q. Repeated by Mr. Crolcer No other rea, ion on earth. ' Q. (fly Mr. Wardle).--Did . yon know. of Mrs: Clarke's livink with, ;tiid utider the immediate pro,. teainn of the Duke of Yolk at this'tirtie I—A. 3t was so uhdersiooci at the tithe. ,Cl. Did you ever s;;e the Duke of York at firirs. Clarke's F—A. Nvver. • ' ' `Q. (13y Mr. Fuller.)-01 your own ktir,Wledge do you know.bt . such a relatiye:situatiou between them.)?,---A. I don't understand the question - Q..(By . gr - .Will*for6;.).-- 77 W44 * pii'eti between yon tind.llo. Clarke, as far as the.inaterview has left any ituttresgion k. When I 'lira came she, MrS. CNrke',' talked ''itrictii'of tuid of secs , b atarollti •ftrizer - she' incurred; if' any thing she did was perrnittit ;to' trinspite. Q. (By the . Chancellor of 111. , ,! Exchegner.)--;-What were her words do not recollea, that was, her tnenning, Q. Did you !wow wont .Mr. Knight that the ex change was in train of being elleoed Retort:' Mrs. Clarko's intluenee was 'asked ,J understood . it, would have been- done. i ti rile. Mrs: Clarke was only aiked to,,xpeclite it, It was a fair thing„, and; would havegone-rekularty through tlte'offitx, • , FXAMINATION 01. — N1R. R. KNIGHT. 141 r. gobe'rt Knight was the Pext ss called to the Hir.' His examination was to the - following Q. Dad Mr. Robert Knight desire Dr. Thynneito use his influence 'with Mrs. Clarke, for the puttiose of expeditihg an exchange between Cot. Knight and Colonel grooke ?—A. I did. Q. Did he authorise Dr. l'hynne to hold OU - t - iny pecuniary temptation to Mrs. Clarke for that pur pose Q. To what amormt ?—A. 2001. • Q.. After the exclitinge was etreited, did Air. Knight send any knuney. to MN. Clark ?-4. I did. CI, To what amount ?-=2N. 20(d.' Mid Colonel Knight iftty positive. promiie from the Commander in Chief that he should be ex changed, prior to the application of Mrs. Clarke ? A. My, brother had applied in the regular way, and, rOceived the usual otticial•auswer, that whetievt.:r a proper 'successor could be found, there would,te uo objettioll to Colliply with biS request. Q. (The last repeated.)—A.No. . , Q. Why was an application m a de t :o . Mrs. Clarke on the subjed Some delay li.d taken place, of the cause of which I was ignorvit. I stated it to Dr, Thymle, wh recortnnettded me to apply to Mrs. Clarke; end I authori>!:;(l him to do so, and to offer her r2OUi. to facilitate my brother's obje&. Q. In what mantY.'r was the t 001. conveyed to Mrs. Clarke ?-11 . 13y my servant, under a blank cover. . Pc Did 141x.-Knight see Mrs. Clarke soon after the exchange had been , 'Gazelted and if so, for What purpose I saw her in Setitember, to thank her for her exertions. Q. On that occasion did Mrs. Clarke request se crecy on the trausadion, and did she assign any e:p,uti for that request Clarke entreated t hat I , would be secret with respect to the transac tion; lest it should come to the linke of York's ears. 0. Has Mr. li.night seen Mrj. Clarke within the last month Yeo. , • Q. How happened it that 'lie saw her?—A.,She sent me a note 'to w 1 made no ' reply. 'Ten days'ago she sent me anyther note, upon which I called ()alter, and she asked me the name of the Officer who had exchanged with my brother. She made a number of complaints of the ill-treatment She had experience(V from Royal Highness the D4e of YOrk, wit") had left her wool, in debt, and expressed her th,tertnination to expose him to the public, Unless could bring him to teats. .I' said that it Wai IPA . affair, and that I trusted she would not produc, me or my brother. Her reply was, " Good Gixt ! no, I . hove no such intention. You can ita..o nothing to do with it." Does the witness know to what the delay in 1113 brother's exchange was attributable ?--A. The clelity ittbst? {n the Duke Of York'S offiee. Q. In what department Col.. Gordon. was Secretary at that time. Q. Ai IA hat hour of the day did Mr. Knight send the 2oul. to Mrs. Clarke Rather early in the forenoon. Q. Did ircons►,t of one or,two notes ?—A. I be lieve two, i 00 each. 41. Frptri._vvlio►u did be receive those notes ?—A. I do not recollect. Q. - Him long was after this negotiation :that the remittance was made ?—A. - About a fortnig - ht or,three .Q, Did Mr., Knight receive`n note from Mrs. Clarke, accompanying the Gazette, in which his .brother'ii exchange was announced?—A,. No, I rt . :- ceived it front Dr. Thymic.' Q. Tit conversation with Mrs. Clarke did Mr. 'l_ ight' nnderstarid that Mrs. ClarkiAlad actually applied to the Commander in Chief to expedhe his brother's exchange, and that the exchange was el fettvd its cons&quence of that annlicatim ?—A_ or Course Mrs. tlarke took ete.34 tb herself for the sue. , Bess' of heriiipplication. • • ' Q. Did Mr. Knight eve learn from Mrs. Clarke that she had' aEtually applied to the Commander , in Chief on flub subject She told me so. t... At the time when the tr.msaatian own:relit did - Clarke xesidei irr•etoucester-place (4...•wac' it arter Mrs. Clarke's appliotiati to the z cqut!sted secreLt !--to Did not . ThYniti,transmit •to Mr. r i be,Garettis firf7which hii brother's excitange aeas itnnounced-?—A. I do not kocrw but he might'. I Q. Was the Gazette-accompanied by 'a note front Irs. Clarke togr,,,Thypite not retnern ber that it was. ...• L• Q. \Vas it afterthe 2001._Was sent to Mrs. Cfalk# that she, expressed.a deske that the tiatis:ittion tt; kept a secret troth the . Doke`of York ?—;.A. Y0f.. 16 a."flid she Viiite'S her •dAire' to conceal (19A") the.l;l4o 9tYzglit 'll.otl4o.ol.„had been,ipaid.her, 'hat were her words ;'—A. She I-et - vested -that the" whWbUsineSsiltiftbipticeated P ~ 'Q, I)id she eitlitlirrieriellpirticiil-frIY its mo ney, or in. gepiral, atopyprsftiom . on iae trapsaCtion the itatiN:itipo,ilscil. . • + t. IVlkt telpher. - - C 2. When Mrs. Clarke' eipressed q wish for se- H4recy, did ,Its also express a wish that his ticljal Highness ',he Duke of 'York" should' 'iict the circultsY,itice Certainty. 0. .Was it not her tvisiitltat hit traits:anion shout(' be kr:pt a secret frbnn the public , ? -4Y. From it iNt. Q. Can Mr. Knight repast the etinversatloll that' passed on that Occasion (—A. Nut exactly ; it uc ,CUrred long.timeago..4 • ••• Q. What 'expressions did Mri- Clarke use, the reeolle6tion of which enitolek . l the witness now. 10 State, that it was not from tlic public . , Bui,from th. 4 Duke of York hituselfhewas XiUtli tO collet at transalion that had• taken She. t;relge 3 that it might be kept a secret front ins Roy ;;l• High , •• nes,;, • . Q. Was she ruore,atixialis,...tg keep Ole transac.-, titm a secret from the- I)uke of York ( hap from the*. publie %—A. The I,tablie Was never itiem i,„cj the, bosinesi. Q. 'When Mrs. Clarke illtimAte.i herintentietfer. emmsing his • Royil Hi4hoos,,, d i ,i slip' pareiculari the nteasures that :;iie +11:..111:i to p',11:;11e for that pure 'pose ?—A. r .tgcollea ,the exitr.4qion ° \v b leb - s h e used on the •occasiou ?--A. Mrs. Claao, 'stated: dint rht! haoh!/nt ungleaed" -and ill-I:r..;ed bT aildthLit if ha wotill out 1'4 . . -,l l r debts she woul,d expose him. 1-7.4 .:Jur,:.(l to withriviN • . , llTl .answer t;H ~ThiLn..7 mon from I\ll. t ~rC who hat"th givq,j,ke. r 1 i:.• 4 „ d ie ilO - Culopel Klaght•fori • • !,.: :la6,t4, l ltati:* 0 1 ,4 C I, licit 4:light 1 0' • torn o i ow! am , had es'': plant Ai I.:. sm.i•iziet . oilly his vimtic., of - Illlw, 41f : Colonel Of the I.:egiment.he should not bee*. justified hi him the Niter of recoturndatioir I : t which P. - . 1 that oc, - .:at,ion he had done. 1 . . • - M'.., Wilt RS 14) it D, 113 ,allosion .to a temporaryßti" se,rxe trOcu the ffOitsa ofMr.'Wardle,caltea (,htto,. .I'lo 9 . Qeutletriati tO s* 'Whether, in tlLit :lOseitc'it,.. he had seen Mrs. Clarke, and if so, what hi, conva' sat inn with her hangien:'• . - , ' Mr. WA RDI. - Ti replied, .that he Certainly• lad L - ;.!ea Mr 4. Clarke ler 'a feW moments; hut ail that he 'Said to Iler 01.11. Mr. Knight Under tiatiOn. m c ..f3 sansro a D lutimated'lliat he should tri.it:e* this a ciistinet subject of . inquiry on Mrs, Clirkel exaMinalion. . EXAMINATION OF MRS. CLARKE. Mrs: Mary Ann Clarke was theft called in alj examined to 'the following effect ' (By Mr. WAHDLE.), . Q. Did Mrs. Catrke reside in Gleticestcr-.,,i1: with his Royal Highness the Duke. of York hi Jt4iY 1805 P—A. Yes, I did.: Q. Was she at that time utylct his Royal High' protedion ?—A. I was. Q., Does Mrs. Clarke recollect Dr. Thymic's 113 " ing attended her 'prOfesSionally'?—A. About dot tittle Di - . Thynne _did attend me: Q. Doe% she'recollea an application made to he. r by Dr, '.l..`,hynne, to useller indocinee with t he Cole" madder in Chief tor ther,lpo,e ut expedifio4 exchange,betweeti . Cuichel Knight and C o t, Br u uic • —A. I do: Q. Did Dr. Thynne iioLl ont to Mrs. Chr expeaation of any pecuniary 'compliment ilt 11"1 event of her success i—A. lie did. Q. Any particuhr sum ?—A. Vei ; h e sa ;d soar.- thing al.wat. ll coupte of hundred poundi. Q. Does "Mn.s Clarke . recullect that Dr. Tilynn told her COL Koight had long neen trying to proco , '' 'the excliangefor which tic was solichou, I 6 ' Q. Did sha'afterwards speak to Courni.;:td j in Chief on the subjo did; Q. How did she cnoniion ?-"" A. I told Ilk Royal Highoesi of it, and gavr,- hitt) (I ':,‘ paper containing the of the Ntriies tnilt been pn't iiito.tny hands by I):. Tli - 11:1*0.. ; ( 1 1. Did :llrs. Clarke at the sxne time str to the .Commatider in Chi e f that slit! c . :n.)ei.!•.l,!:i a p?i-A 14 0 41 reconinence for. leer troubii : ~,/ parties had promised to ntal,:e me a complor - -.ont. Q.- Did she. state the alTionDt i t , 5,, A„ ) . ;) 1 nesi—A. lam nut cetiain whether i or lO t. -11 Mrs. elarko hit inciltlone( l 4 the-I;ottitnander Ip Clel_ joß'.g liny pecuniary coirip,enicittor),.?,----,\. yajliighness "that I did no: kiio , :v tile men but that I. cert3inir'erettpd a COiliplitic'nt 11.° zi thein. • • ' • g Vii. et) t exchange aproareil i it th e Galen do s M". Clark: (41-•.ullort lending it LJ 'I do.. Q. she snd . 3 butt' with it YCS. Q. 1I:41 Iqrs.,ciarke ivt,'!eive afturwadiporly P ecl2.* niary culisideiatisni i—A. :Yes, I did.. Q. *How mud) 4 1 1 wo hundred Bank notes. Q. In what wiy sent ?—A, Incl , yid it a tiuti tv;, r