The Sun. — London, England, 1809-02-16 00:00:00

_Ol writing of the Tattiness herself?-4. Yes, Oh 6 of ; nut you will allow that I bad not a m oment to iook over t h em . Th ese l etters were brought here ag: - .st my consent; I ardered .thou} to be burnt tw , ive months ago. Q. Dews the witness moan by the Baroness Nul lekeus's eldest son, Mr. Le Maitre ?—A. No ; Gus tavus Nollekens. Q. Did the witness ever see him write ?—A: Yo; hut. t repeat that, L am not positive this is his . hand- Wri!ittg. Q. Did the witness mean to say, in a former an twer, that the letters to her, from Baroness. ,Nolle• !tens, w e r e wr i t t en a b o ut a twelvemonth ago ? A. No: I presume the datee_will.tell when they were written. Q. Is the witness acquainted with the Baroness's ether sons-?. - -A. No.. Lot Acgtpinted with only two of the sons'. Q. The witness cannot be positive then that 'this latter was written by. auy one of the sons ? A• No, I cannot. Perhaps it might have been mitten by the Baron himself. I know the subjed of it pretty well. The Baroness wanted a pension of 400 i, a year, and 'applied to ,me to use my in iluence to obtain it. On the motion of Mr. LEACH, the witness was ordered . to withdraw. 114 r. I.,,eAcar observed, that the 9uestion whether Or not these. letters ought to be redd, had not yet beendecided by the Committee. It was, therefore, highly improper that the witness's last answer should stand on the minutes, and , he proposed that it should be expunged., Alter a few observations from Sir T. TURTON and Mr. C. ADAMS, it Wai agree that the answer should remain. • • Mr. IT. ELnItIITON'S letters were then read by the Clerk. They were to the following etlea My January .18. D e, A.R\ MADAM— Nothing but the pardonable anxiety uhich 1 feel for the xvellare of my children, should induce Inc to tretpirss on y our pat i ence. Y ou kno w my b o y Ch ar l es; Jte is a prune youth, and has had an excellent education. I have lately obtained for him a Cadetship at Madras. I-le is on board an Indianan which will sail on Wednesday. no you think his Royal Highness the Duke of York would ho nour him with letters nt recommendation to.. Lord Williafn Bentinck, and to the Commander in Chief, desiring th at h e may be removed frotit tiw infinary to the cavalry t, If you Can elicit this for me, it will , be deeply' engravon on my heart. 1 have this moment received a. letter ; from Green, w ho says he has heard from ' and desires inc nut to desp a i r t b ut I tear it is all over. 1 am, my dear Madam, your's, 'Ate. ' H. Y. ELDERTOII. xt, Portman-square. 3d Dec. MY DE AR MnnA lit -I fancy, you arc, what I hope yoU ever \vitt be, a stronger to anxiety, or else you would not. hive left t o w n wit h out r e p l y i ng to rn' letter. :Thai l you be able to mention the subject to the Duke of York on Mon.. drt ry It so, you ca" perhaps communicate to inc the tesult Tuessclay. am, azg.. • Lin icrotsi. , ins ROYAL HIGHNESS THE DUEL OV VOICK• SSII‘^IE is itamitely beyond my power to express to your " 1 114 lip4pness the great gratitude which I .feel 1.1 the ta. your con ferred upon' me, by the confirmation of site leave of absence" ranted Inc by Sir Robert Abererombi&. - Your Royal highness has raised me trout the cleepestuiespzdr,.anct I shall ever bless you,tor your gracious conduct. .1 stn, Zec. • 11. Y. EI;DERTON. The Letters of the Baroitess' . . r ollekens were to the lollewing,etled • To . MRS. CLARKE, MACGATE, KENT. M Y 4 1.41 t N 1 morning 1 had the favour of Your letter. tresh uniik of )outaitentipn govt., the the tricacct;plosi.ore. I hope that the change ot'air is ill he •,,er wg to Yialf My dear 11 - ronteAs to ass , rothe Duke.of Yotk t • • * II thinks his Mojesty , its gtatutuie tor his gracious LOHCIIG„. hat; 1 ):11. - iv - eti with thlio'!libel'ahat' , `loward hint titan Mr. ------- in 4 , 4 years. I'll:atter rritselt4liii . you 'wilt Visit Inc on Wednesday:next. Tii e pie wire of. Ow' 50; vitAy,k to int: the greatest enjoyment c : iv .1 •ttl ) to - ,ruse , tude Which' 1 kul for the services t ' vh,j 4 e Li ji y b Ou ' llaVe resider 4 'I: - • ' " . 17 a have the honour to be, &c; citor,s; • • _ N94.141 , 41,[ 1 0.,1 . . Thutattiay, Five o'Clock. • 1" + .4 "r•• 4 1454 , 40 1 414--1 see by the,Papersthat the .I) 4 l te 01 'VOA war With the King yeAerttirmor n i n g and that Mr. fietWaiditted it in ivate. audience of his NI ajest y. 'MAY .hope that my requeot litas.,been complied will, and sett Will tft i tyr W with 4o . " aqcoitnt pr the way in w tich , w 4 43 •C‘eiveo lam attre#ol,crw•flv,partion my anxiety. A . thou. ... .'""Ah , 11(11.11 " 1 * .c o'4 41 4nhy!dhr NhAen, tio r the carp which you ititigi the honour to he, 6.. c ENS: I:.nt het QtjaktiM. CU.OR . 0f tllO ExcliP.oui:a called the atteion i;1( the Committee to t 14:.. circutmtanco tllltt the lettei which b.c.l, r beep juitgiead - , putporkindo fr .htuAlroElderton : .to )'orlf;;Avas w ilttktutta;seal. -.11 bad _probably ne,enlettioltlied in a toyer to tilm Clarke, to be sent to his 'loyal:l:bet tess or not, as that Lady pleased, but:itAlias-found iq the custody 01 Mrs, Clarke herself; :Thecoas Walker was then called to ~ t he bar, and *omitted .to the folloWintletrea: ; -, .witness live with 41 . ..".5. Clarke in Gloucester-place Yes. Does , the witnescretsttlgat footman: there of •t he (;1 - samlici.t.;artet . ?-4,4.11: Yes. SLwatet Carter in dig constant' habit of waiting at , dinner, tile, wit nem AAR- thort3L?r, ;i1: :Ye& - • . • Ct., Mel the witness klirM Miss Taylor.,?”,-A.! Yes. Has lie: frequently wencher in! Gloucestet place ? , ‘-f.A. Yes, 1 hattte i Jet)! • ' , .'f:.. Does the , wittiess , Tettillect..whether Samuel Carter was in the hattitof giaihEchehitid Mrs, Clark/11s r naglSl? , , i .l4, Yew, he was. •: • _I.; CI I I " .11 3r:1.01111 .loatutsToNs.:—,Was • the witne ss ' ea ," coachquan; to Mrs. Clarke?—..A. Yes.. .7 .... How. many horses did; she leepl-;-ttu.Starnei. spinet t Q . How Many carringes:';"*A rP.tto . . 4.0 Ve.,.“ - ) (A.,',lVever; more ?- 4 -A.4 never mitre-ougismt 'at WIC tjth . e . :: , • . • t;t: Ditraita keep"more at agother time tat " "AO paid .lur the aketp of:. the Jhoises'i•-e;A. s. Clarke. IQi4•-pid,slie pay the billsl-441.'. i. know she :did. '.l-4‘ll,Wero' the througit the witness?— , ; . ..; By 111 r. Your-E.—Did satinuel - Carter wear a • • " Houk ,. does the .Witness know that Saltine' "rtes , waited at table.?..4-.A.. I waited at the sante - Q , 'Dfict,the witness ever•wait at table when th e oko ur York Was there ?•••.-..A. 1 did. Didlhe .witness wears livery when he waited 4ftable No ; l• did , net, • When Samuel Carter went behind the car tisfge wos-it without- a . liver' ?—A. Yet. ( 51. Had Nil's. Clarke any livery servant es, a tooirnan. -stmt. w mIDLE.—Dia the - witness - wear a tiveiy whi nrhe avo'nd tile atil I- age * , - Q. Did Aloe . witness kno‘'v with 'whom Sarn.tel Carter before he Calllo to Mrs. elttrk,? A: I understood he lived along vcith Capt. Sutton._ Q. Did the witness ever &ea-him at Mrs. Cl:like's when lie was :Cup% Sutton's servant ? N. •Q. ;When the witness said i hat he understood Sti. mud Carter lived along with Capt. Sutton, did he mean that he was Captain Sutton's servant?—.-A. did .not. Q. When Samuel Carter lived at 'Mrs. , Clarke's did he dine with the other servants ?-- , A; For any thing that I know. Q.. 'Did not the witness dino with them No. Q. Was he on board wages ?—AI Yes. Q.: the witness ever hear 'whose son Samuel Carter was supposed to be ?—A. I never did. I. • Q. How many menservants did Mrs. Clarke !I keep Sometime* six, sometimes seven. Q.' Thies the witness. recoiled Miss I'aytor's dining With Mrs. Clarke, —when he-was waiting ?—A. I recolle6t whet) the Duke of York and Mrs. Clarke dined together, there was another lady. I s Q. Does the witness know who that young lady was ?—A. I do not.' • ' Q. Does the witness mean to say that he does not know, or that he does not recoiled ?—A. I do not recollect. Does the witness knew Miss Taylor ?—A. I do now. Q. The witness before has stated, that he has seen Miss Taylor, has he ever seen her Gtoucester place ?—A. Certainly.' Q. By Sir J. SENBIUGHT.—What was Samuel Carter with . Captain Sutton ?---A. I never heard what.he was. • . . . Q. Does the witness know that he was not a ser vant with him ?—A. I do not. Q. How-long did the witness live with Mrs. Clarke ?—N. 'About three years. Q. With whom does , lie live now ?—A. Mts Clarice. • Q. By the ATTORNEY-GENERAL.---When did the witness,:tirst live with Mrs..Clcirke?—A. What his Royal Highness came to Glousester-place Q. Has the witness continued with per ever since'?—A. No. Q. When did - the witness leave her ?—A. Alter Mrs. Clarke left Gloucester-place". Q. When did the witness return to Mrs. Clarkei service ?—A. About toN'tnths ago. • Q. Did the witness live with her any time between those perinds'which` he has mentioned'?- 7 A. I lived with Mrs. Clarke a little time after she had . left Gloucester:;phei!. U. Did Samuel Carter frequently go behind the carriage ?—A. Not more - than once or twice? Q. floW'iting<dieSamuel Carter liVti.with Mrs. Clarke ?—A. About twelve months. The winless was ordered. to withdraw, anal, Wrn. MiDe,iw all was called to tf?elar, whose examis;atioa way trearlyas follows IV Mr.. WMIDLE.—Did :the-wittless live as foottuatt with 1 1 .virsi.diarkp at Gloucester-place 3-21. Yes. Doeil re'6ollect another footman who lived there at the iatlie' tithe Samuel Carter I be= (4. Did the :witness and. Samuel Carter do their Work together ?—A. .Ire did. - • Does the witties know Miss Taylor ?—A. knowa Lady of the name of. MisS Taylor ; but there Are . se , many of that name. .1. know a Lady who went down to Weybridv of tbat . name. 6.. Does the witliess recellecit Miss . Taylor being atGlo,icester-elace I cannot say. I know a tad?' 6( Wage of 'fayltir 'used to call, but I can't spy .that. L shaolil k 1 w. o her.: Q. Does the,yvitness- recoiled .whether it was the lady whoin he spot of as a Miss Tlylor, %Vey. 'bride, that. wasatGloucester-place . ?—=.A.. - Ves,' I do. :D6cwthe <wittiest; • recoiled that Miss Taylot ,watdever WeYbriOge, a ben the Duke of York was therel—A. I can't say (cIIAV aft lie witness in the hdbit of going to We y - bridge with Mrs. Clarke ?—A, Yes. Q. Did the witness , ever.see the Duke of York lima-14W Zlc4', l LoAtl t - say. but I did. 0,. T;be!mitnes e s also states that l,e saw Miss Tor,- 19r there ? : .- 17 A. I believe I have. 02 'die& ' witness recolfeet ever having" seen Ails Taylor . .at Weybridga.:Avlturt-the Duke of Yot•k was there i—A. 1 told you,before : that lihßs Might 4 * there for any thing tlialknew.—(Order,. order .) Q.' artort4 Rtvkmii,u*pS sel—Wits*ll.oel Carter CIPPIoKed any Qthn 'WAY ;.bvtiltWailing he, was, employed l ieryant . when I came 1 4 tlis4.: l lPytwz,, , k..l..c 4(4,:rc1 as ,a setsant as far as I know . 2 • ivkAtt 11) cm - ter, cline Av It 11 the . strykint $ ? , (4- Wait. -1)-0 in.tht; sarn# capacity as a servant with the willies. ? , r. ~?pose so r he' did the work along with ine, tinte z e allktkat I C3l) sfr,ty. • Dyes Wit IIeSS live nO \V with Mrs. Clarke ? .Al-7-N(;. • • C 1: 44 hit itv Yea, I John a. In what year did the Witness live with Mrs. .Clarke-in Gioncester-placei.—A: I & 't recollect. The witness was then ordert44, to withdraw- Mr. Sucilla.obsetved, that aS the witness °P" pe4red to•booinAsraje .of intoxicatioa, : his evidence ought not at present to be' received. Mr. Bathurst tblptlfrAclltat though the witness had eertaitily taken ,ratiktg heilid not appear to, be incapable .01,attswerieg, (intstious and that, compared with the testimony of sonic 01 the evidences that 11:1,1 ap peared : betore Atte, House, his tesiiinui.iy tica, tole.• rated.—Sir,Thouras Turton, Mr, Snit li,, the chan cellor 01 die 44c. leaner, Mr. Brown, colottel3 Vo lcker, apa .Ellison, Captain. klarvety,, Mr. Fuller, Barham, and Rip. senuier, spoken as to the Anestion pt .propriety.and form, and tins result W4i that. the witness was again in and exatalit) o,l , by Mr.. 'Wardle. Q. I wish to.knpw.iti what'year the witness first `vent to live with Mrs. Clarke I—A. I. told yue I could 4ot-teli but I can guess pretty near. Q. Was it in .1808.?—A. I cannot say exaOly, rthotigli I pcirtiVocullect. . Q. 'What dues the witness partly reollea 1 cannot stly, - as,l, told you haterkt. 'Q. Witness statedhe could partly.tecolleft. What can he pally Jecone4i ?-4. I was nut in but cannot •exattlY say. Q, .Wereluu in the $411'400 of Nlts. Clarkvfour years I;=‘.. G, Were you six yelirt in lief gerVite I could recoiled I should haVe had4lb otosion- to say, I could not jsistly say. • .(, • Q. When did you quit the service of Mrs. Clarke.? —A. I cannot say, because I cannot reculietl. • 14. Do you not .know what year it Wai in forvt- the year, but I .know what alk I got notice to:attenil here. ,•.•;• - CrWbeti , did you receivy notice to attend here A. I cannot tell the holm Q. Was it yesterday ur to•day ?—A. 'Ellis after noon. .' Ordered to withdraw. • MRS. FAVOtTRITE ty.klaslsr). 4, Did you liee with Mrs. Clarke in Gloucester place Yes, Sir. Q. Do you redollea Sam. Carter ?—A. Yes. Q. Was Sam Cat ter iii the constant habit of wait ing on Mrs. Clarke and the Duke of 'York ?—A. Yes, Sir, be was. Q. Do you know Miss Taylor ?—A.' Yes, Sir. Q, Was, She in the habit of dining often with, Mrs. Clarke and the Duke of York ?—A. Yes * Q. D'a, you remember "any tliing of it note sent out 'to be changed before the Duke of York 'went to Weybridge ?—A. Yes, but I do not know what the note was; a serwitt gave me the money to take up stairs ; the Duke was in the room with Mrs. Clarke---ice short, they were in bed. ' Q. Did Samuel Carter do the same business as another footman ?-=A; Ho did '• ' he cleaned the &dies, knives, and candlesticks g, heals° cleaned the carriage, and waited at table. ' • • Q. Was not the house in Gloucester 7 plkekept at a great expence Certainly it was ;, we had sumetin4es two, sometimes three men cooks. Q. 'Was it' on any.partizular occasion . that two or three' men 'cnoks were engaged ?—A. No ; Mrs. Clarke wished to entertain the Duke in the hest manner. If a dish did not please Mtn, 'she always bad it changed. Q. Have you known Mrs. Clarke often distressed for money ?-4., The bnke orYork never paid her debts well; after' the first quarter people brought in their bills„and-seented, to think I had th,e money to pay them. U. Did you know Mrs. Clarke before she lived in Gloucester-pi:ice ?—A. Yes, Sir. Q. Howleng did you know her before?—A. I cannot say. U. Did you know her ten years before she resided in Gloucester-place ?—A. Above ten yeas. Q., How long above that time ?—A. I cannot,say. Q. Have you known her twenty year's?—A. No, I !lave not known her so long as th4t. Q. 'Where did she live When she first became known to you I—A. At Hampste - ad. I went there to see a servant: veil. Q. Did you not know her before ? 7 . 7 A. Yes, I went.to her siY weeks after her marriage. Q: Did you live with her from that time ?-4. 4. po p Sir. . Q. Who recommended you.to Ml 3. URIC ?-A, An - advertisement in the paper. Q. Where did she live when you first entered ihto her . service In Gloucester-place. Q, Did ygu not live with.her in Tavi,tock-place ? —A. 0 no, I then lived . in another family. Q. What family did you then live in That of a Mr. Elio., Q. Where did.Mr..Elll ?—A. In the city. - o.7`ertrat parrot the cup ! , •—•A: I don't Q. Hovi long did you live in that family ? A. Two years. Q. Did you live with them two years without be ing able to learn what part of the city they resided in ? never troubled my head about.it, they kept a shop in one part, and hod . lodgings in another. O. In what part of the city was the: scup situated ? Indeed I don't know, Q, What pit of• the city did they lodge in, ?••-,-A. "don't know. 1 4 11ey Went to' Isilargate and Bi igh ton ; they were all sickly people. Q. Can you. &hie no idea where the shop and lodgings were 'situated in •i—A. I don't .know, lit "a street near theapside. . 0 By the. ATTettswi•Gar , TEAAL , -- - Had" they hidgings I cannot say, L)id you_gOftoliiighton Withi , ut Mr. Ellis ? A: 1" - tii, Sii; I went with the children, Mr. Ellis cam , ...there,afterWards, • . Q. HoW aid you stLly there ?—A. Three month;. • . Where did your live at Bri , rliton ?—A. I can not ex36iy say, but it was opposite the sea. 9- i!When tliclyott go to Margate ?—A. Really I cannot: tell. (o.,„Wl i credi,l you live there In HO -street. .'What . .-reasons have . i•ou for being so reserved when speaking of tins tain'ily ?—A, No, reason, Sir.' a. po you know Capt. Sutton ?—A. I did Sir, 'but - tic 4s :Ck t it. SuttOn dead? Yes,' Sir, he has been c WO years. WaS Sampel Carter a natural son of the Cap tain ?—A. !Weed, Sir, I don't Istiowi. Did you never suppose_ be was )-!--A. I can't tell what others supposed,. U. DM he %%car u livery ?—A. No. Sir .W . ti,l4ams.-rnl)id the Duke of York give you any money coutratled at Gloucester-place? No,:he never. gave me any Intimey in hi' Vde. Q. Did any one belonging to him N'.. Q. Did you knovt , ,Sam. Cafler prior t() you with Mr. •411i5,?..- 7 ,4„1 don't recoil , . tct. While .with Mr. Nveat, to . 4iightoo, 'Margate, and 4o row t U. Ara you uot. related to Mrs. Clarke,;---A. lam not. 0... pa you mean t o say ypii.are not her sister ? A. I dop... , Q. Did you pay. -Mrs. ,clai*e's servants their wages ? A., Yes.. ,• Did you ever pay any to Carter ?.—A. I have given him .money sunny time) to buy whit he wanted'. • Q. Da you recolkaAny agreement for wages ? A. NO, • . . • .140•• Q. Y Uu have been supposed to keep money back from creditors ?—A. Royal Highness was always very baCkwardioadva4cing money. Q. Did you ever kthow debts paid in consequence of nti application to .the DoLe :of York YeA. Q. act 1 1 11 s. ClarVis* otter find tiL:bts paid by Lk _Royal liighnes . sl—.--A. Thy hare bL•ch p;,id eti heu he was ibere, „ , , . C4, - Dii..t.Sarn,ca!te,r sere Cap.tain Stittoo tr the scale ‘,ipacity as ile Mrs,. Ci3rlie?-4.1.15. • • • & ~ you ,- J. . . . i tl. You say . pald sertants; bow. mnity had 1 Mrs. Clarke in - her• service at- GlouteWr-phtee ',,--- A. 'Four men In tho stable, g boy and three in did Louse. : Q. Did Mrs. Olarke's servants receive stEliidini wages ?—A. Standing annual wages. a. How many servants were -there at AVeya bridge ?=-A. The latuidry-maid.and cook. Q. By Mr. WiLat ittoottcli:':Who fofnished the upholstery ?--A. Mr. Oakley, of Bond-street. ..• Q. Were you Mrs. parktes . own maid ?—A. wag her own maid and housekeeper. - Q. Do you know Mr. Dowlei-?---A. I- have seem him frequently at Glnucester-pluee. Q. Did he ever stay-there the night ?-..A:.140.did; Q. Were the tradesmen willing to give credit on the authority of Mrs. Clarke ? . ---A..Sornetimes they sent what wag ordered, sometime* they • did not. • . Q. By Mr. BERESPORD.Witti Captain Sutton in did habit of comingbeforre.,,Sam Carer came • d Carter go with bith I don't know. Q. Was , Sam Carter in the habit of going into tb4 parlour with Captain Sutton ?—A. No. Q. Did you ever see Carter after he got a cont.:- mission ?—A. Don't think I ever did. Q.. Did he get the commission while at Mrs Clarke's.?— , A. Yes. Q. Did he leave Mrs. Clarke's service for that i—% A. Yet, he did: Q, Was Carter known to the Duke of York `by the name of 'Sam; Samuel,- or Carter ?—A. Sam but his ROyal Highness knew him by the name of Carter also. 'Q. - Was he a p erson of superior education to the other servants ?-r—A. 1 do not know ; Sze imas vary - , Q. Did you - dine with the servants?----A. Yes, I sat dol.vn with them all. • • Q. By I‘l. WILBERFORCE.-"WEIS Mrs. Clarke in the habit of receiving visits front other Gentle►lien in the absence of The Duke ?—A. Yes. Q. Were those who Vistted her considered rich ? A. I don't know. ' Was Captain Wallace ever there I don't know such a name. Mr. WARDLE ►roved, that a passage in one of the printed letters be read, from Mrs. Clqrke w Donor va►►, dated Jan. 28i 1809. " To be candid with you, I -must tell, I have given some of your letters to Mr. Wardle, one, in which yOu speak of. the . Queen, and those relating., to the Deaneries, to facilitate a negociati,,ii." Q. To Mr. WAADLE.-•---Did Sirs. Clarke give letter to facilitate any negociation N 6, nevdr; nor dO I know what she means , by that expressiott I have letters from Mrs. 'Clarke, besides what I took from her in the way before described. Dono• Van I have examined in this House. Mrs. Clarke was then called in and examined: Q. A letter addressed to the Duke, frOttyMrl:.El4 derton, having no mark of a seal has been pro= dneed—How came' that' let ter Into your possession'? A. Inclosed in a letter. I skewed it to the Duke to let 'him . see the Man was grateful. Q. Did Captain Sutton take care of Samuel Car.:. ter's education ?—A. He was net well educated wkien he came to me; I sent him to behool. Q. -Did - Capt. Sutton give him any education A. I do not know. 1 Q. Were you not in some degree partial to Car j ter ?-11. He was a good, boye j Q. What regiment did Capt. Sutton belong to ? 1 —A. -I believe he was formerly In a regiment of gre nadiers. He would have been near perishing through t want, but for me. Q. Did you not respea Sam: Carter above, your other servants ? 7 ---A. I did, because he was faithful ..• . • to me. • 0. When did you - ..get Elderton his Paymaster. , ship ?-!-A. I do not exactly know ; but it was be. fore Gen. Simes died. Mr. LoCtitrAßT--I wiSh 'the: witnesss - to hear the letter--[printed letter read]---Did you give it to fa cilitate' . 4 . 11 r tie z .timitityt- , -A-..Yes, 1' did. had suttie`let tert -besides those' Mr. 'Wardle ram 'away. with, from Officers !who wanted companies, • were to psy :4001. aimve•the established prices, which sums ware to be shared by Dotiovati, ' mm! 'Fro, and mysejf, • • Q. By : . Mr, Yoiti s What ort ,of negociation does the witness Ineami--- I, A. • procure sowe're commendations. in beliallot sonic young men for ihet • purpose of Promotion. Q.' By Si, JOHN StA:ntttotyr—.Whether the Duke ,of York-told the witness at . :any `time, that he had reoeived infOrrnation that she was engaged in nggo-' ciations'•ofthi; kind, - and expteased his displeasure thereat I—A. He did not. • - a. , By Mir. Bancsroatt- , --Whether -the Duke of York did' . not wholly disapprove] of the . conduel df the witness in the procurement•of-these.reconitnew. dations ?—.A. Ho . never - did, but he said:olo,le would attetld to them in time. Mr. WAIIDLI; here explained,-what he edriceiVod Mrs. Clarke meant by the term oegocialioo..Hq , h t , lieved she meant nothing more than' Merely-dip sending of some letters to him, in order to.-proetire the. signature of a General °Aker, or • that of Member of Parliaent, Which' she stated was :1 11 4 th that Mr. Dono9n.wanted, for the purpose at Mkt ., ceeding in the application': that in reply to.this a p:.• pijedtion he stated that this friend was tin opposi. Lion, ` and consequently his signature would avail nothing. Mr.WARDLE examined by Mr. BERESFORVi Q. Has the Hon. Metnber 7 any'- objection to the produaion of the letters alluded to by iVirs. Claike4 A. They are produced "already, 'aid are now on the table. a Are the lctuars which Mrs. Clarke gave:the Hen. Gentl.ntian for the purpose of'proctiring tares,' as already stated, now an the table ?—.4: think they are, and I have no obje4tion whatever t'o lay every letter and papertn my possession, rel.itive tothe inquiry before•the Committee; on tlie table. in giving this answer 11 , Ir. 'Wardle was called to order, by° Sir John Seahright, in consequelite of • LOrd Folkstotte's whisperibg something' in the ear .of theFioti. Member. • Mr. WHITBREAD rose and observed, with much warmth,' that biA Ham Friend (Mr. Wardle) was in perfect order; that no irregularity whatever was committed', for it-was:perfeelly consistent with the rule of parlianviiasary evitletwe' tfir Alernber4o make communicatons to another 41 the eoi l r o f Lord Fcti.K:sTo:N . F... declined, that What be eoinriln- , n icated' to the 1-Hon':Mc.nhttr was petleCily inuoCent,