The Sun. — London, England, 1808-12-24 00:00:00

LAIL REPORT'. COURT OE CO:\INIt)N PLEAS, DEC 23. LORI) -.MER V. KNIGHT. 1 . 14 ,Lt :on h;ought by Lord Dormer, as of his Kni, , ht; tc coMpt) the aity,ent of a sun:: pun an annuity granted her, her int-Otin:11, the Hon. Francis Knight, asion of : their separation in Igo4. SitCrnEwo, for•the Plaintiff, stated, Ih,(. Defendant .. and his wife., cot living happily ot;cth , . , r, had ::,greed to separate. The Defendant .ad"coveniinted to allow_ his wife 8001. per annum, deed. But there 'vas another deed bkwhich 1 h of 8001. a year was to . berednced to 4001. Mrs K . tti2,llt, associated or cohabited, lon,l huaier, a Captain of a company in the Ite:.;l:ertit (;: , arcs. Mr. Knight had , cd 1. e plyntent to the lower SUM), u , had e , back.,a Pitt tha: ice ; 'aud he was instrocled to say, that the cause ii iht-; hill Airs. Knie)ithad tvlused to c4n _, cot to a 'snit of divorce, and t hus*ecoMe a party to her 0‘. , ..11 diqvice. - It th J s, nut, Irr, condua as of . the basest Mod.' Ile would prove the exe :nt ion of the deed , ,, and he dt tied the defendant to that Mrs. Kiiiitlft had lost her right to the ir.„.;er'ailocity, by aoy intercourse with 2ulonel-Fuliel, ; ,and then the. Philnliff, as tier Trus .ce, w(•.11.; be entitled to the ‘hole of the claim. . 1 .1 . h.s proof aito:wther consisted of adinission4 by . .le,De.fc..!rnlan't, who the execution ?t . the .t4A-•:ds ihdt 1;0 inor,7 hid bt , en paid than t-ne staked by the . Mi. Sctjeant for the bofendant then ad dressed the Jury, and in the r..-ourse of his speech foul:d it necessary to state the particular circnni which bad given rise in these deeds. Mr. h. i4hi, ;serious to t . 1804, • had strong itho fidelity of wife, althouol lie was not t hen -I) , :epared with full pro , f. An adion, h it .d been c,,nirnenced by hiin in the Court Bebe., but as be w a (lot:L.)1(ot whet l;er, he sloul I be ab;e to prove fits wife's adultery in a Cobrt a:t:Jough he himself was fully satisfied of wact -t prop sul to her and Colonel Fuller that . 11v1 - ill(kr:tit U , go by def;lult in the i!,:tics, and that he wotild Allow Mri. Knight the. mtraby ~tmve-wentioutd, and _2OOOl. out of _;.j4;o!. hitch *she .brought him as a fortrino; h,o,veo-r, th,st s.L.,u should not keep Corn p.:ny or with Colouei Fuller, ..vho was con ;;;-, her I')2.l•aul..mr. To thiS the parties_assent jf,(l4.:ll,,w' was allowed 'to go .by. yLefault in the .I.3c:,ch',...asid 70001. damages were award- C,urt. This sum Mr,. Knight to C,.l)liel Fuller; and immediately upon this Mrs. Knight opposed - the divorce in Duaors' (.%)niunons. - :The. Dor:ner lamily•themelves had been * highly iseiisibe of the generowy of Mr: Knight; and yet this was rile husb:rnd whom his Learned Friend had been instructed w call base. He characterised - the con dip- of the opposne parties as abominable in'having abused the gentir.sby of Mr. Knight, and cheated hitriin this tran44#ion, by refu , ittgto fulfil,t heir bar g:un. Nks..lcAlit and Colonel k Fuder v.ishel't* . pontinue their intilliaty, and yet to irive he Irag: , r stim He would prove that C,ilov e l huller aTtcl this unfoitunate Woman had continued to as.oci:ne to4ethei, alter the execution of the deeds. It was riot necessary lir him atirove a criminal in. tere-ui se iroul the -timd oi- ttlC separa!ion, but he would z! •e 'visiis of Co}. V,oller.to Mrs. Knight, 'and Ire ako prove the pt - tWious adultery.— When visas ele contnued'after that, the rest might be presumed. The Plaintiff would then at all evekto be able to recover only the arrears of the inferior brit as the second deed had not been put on•tbe re cord by the Plaintiff, he'sybinitie,s that theta must a vercha for the Defendant: J. I\INNSFIgLD, Chief Ju'dice, however, considered.the second as part of the'first, af:d therefore held that there was no oc casion for, its being'speci . ally named on the record by the PlAintiffi) Anne Wharitin was the first witness called. • She liVed with Mrs Knight after the separation, when she resided in GI attester-place;and in Baket-street. S e saw Colonel Fuller id the house with her mil twac-r three .times, -.but knew of nothing itn pro er baying passed - between them. -do ) : tier cross-exaniination by Mr. GA.nßow, she said that s;:e had been sent for by Mr. Knight, who said t hat she uoight do him service, but she had persisted that she knew ncithing improper in the coAntot Mrs Mr. Knight had, offered her no money, nor Made any, promise to do her a service. _ • Ednor rived as : footman- with Mrs. Kiljght, dt . ;ring the i!ear 1806 a!A a pi-nt of 807. 1 Colonel otten tisned Mrs.,Knight—he could not JAI the nu , hb:r , :t titnesit might he ten or twenty. lie no reason to so,pect any . critninal inter- He had F;hetwn stint intolue drawing-room is the custom with visitors. cu;.irF.e, To prove the ptevk-ous•adnitery, , • Maly Dches,w ,. a'called. She lived' in 1803 / with Mrs. I.:. F ey(lVlrs, sister) in C4burton st-reet. ISlrs'. Knight , and COlond ffequently met at her Mistress's houie. — l2hey vvere ( ) n e n on the parlour - alone to - getlwr with the door iocked, whole her mistress ivas in the house,- sUinetimes in. the adjoining room. On one occasion the witness . iketir up to the irarlour, door, which she fOund 1 0 , : k e d. Lri a shutt time Fuller opetrea tint . knowl!ig she , : szts inotnedi.i;(-ly at the (loot. She went in and saw-Colonel Fulli2r ;:diusting his and Mrs. Knight'," dress iii Urhat she'des cribed a, a very- tumbled state. She did not sly . m y thing at the Owe-about this, but thuught she had got' into a very odd sort of house. She often t.;asv Mrs.. Knight going out and coining in, and 'al-. 'ways when ,he, went out of the house aster Colonel Faor had been with her, the dress she wow ap . iwitred mkt, rumpled: - On her ewis-en,atnina.tion by Mr. GAnitow, she that alter observing the„scene in the parlour she slept as sottuOly as usual, and ,lote, , x not . why she 1 • si o„id She AA_ tieer gone by any other name b ut vi r al Et6:es. Sue had indeed married a man of tii:t! -kionhe,, but utidist'ailding he had " --. l);:enpreviOusly married, site hid inanediatesl3, after "tins re'snined" her own name. •• Mr-i..Thorntoit; who itad been .nurse in Mr. niCy, tri.-iijt2S3 and was atllcighton, ,:wing the 'laces, :she 4otic to the parlour-dool s(,;n'd in t)lIC Ut .the ch:ldren, but found it locked. how ever, called out that she would op: 211 the dour hi mediate/Iy. When she did . so, her dr . e,s u i in dis order, and she herself apparently 11l g.ftat confusioil. Sarah Franklin Eyed as house-maid Mrs. Impey ; Col. Fuller and Mrs. Ktii4ht were in the habit et visiting her mistress. They were - often left alone together. One dry her-Mistress, Colonel Fuller and Ars. Knight, were in the draWing-room 'to.get her. Mistress came out and went into the adjoining main, leaVing the other . s alone together,— Alter they came out, the witness 'observed - thZ.-. dress of Mrs. Kni.-;ht. in disc der. - She - . went into, the drawing-room,. riff which there was bed=room, the only; way to which was through the drawing- . room. She found the bed much tumbled, and ex hibiting the appearance of two persons having been in ii. . SCr . l:23llt SHEPHERD was about to address the Jury, when Sir J. MANS:i 7 LELDinrorriled , him, "that he'did not think it neeeSsary for the P,:feodant to prove that crimitial intercourse had passed betskeen these parties, subsequent to the execution of the deeds. CharleS Goring, Esq. and Coloriel Gould were then Called on the part of the Plaintiff, to prove that the visits of . 6'oloi - iel Fuller to Mrs. Knight had been oeca::iioned in consequence of proposals to the . parties .by Mr. Knight himself. It turned out, hbwever, (ilk 'Mr. i...night hid never sanctioned an tisit, excel); itt one or two instances lig - inc . :Abe negoCikion about- the action wits going forward. .. , Mr. Serjeant .BEST contended, that if Isis case had wanted any thing, that deficiency would have been fully made up by the evidence . now 'produced. by , the Plaintiff. He particularly dwelt upon the circrtm-. stance thk Coterie] Fuller was in Court, and if his witnesses had said any thing that was not true, the Colonel might have been called to contradict them, - and to disprove, if he Could,' either the previous adultery or- the subsequent 'visiting-. But both he and Mrs. Knight had confessed the adultery already, —be e by alloWing inAginent to go by default, and she'in a letter to Mr. Goring. Mr. Serjeant was beard ;n reply. He thought the meaning of the words in the second deed was, that Mrs.:Knight and Col. Fuller should not so associate as,to give the wyrld reason topre sume any criminal intercourse, and.notiling" had been Proved to shew any ground to believe, that a• intercourse had pussed. He also observed .upon the improbability of the. stones_ told ,by Etches, Thornton, and Franklin ; and, upon the curious na. Lure of the delicacy ascribed to Mr. Knight, who was not contented with proving his wite an adulteress, but had also endeavoured to prove her sister a bawd.. Sir J. MANSFIELD said, that the, question - here was a- very simple one. It was,, whether, 'subse quent to the execution of the deeds, Mrs. Knight had received the visits of Colonel Fuller, as an ordi nary acquaintance. • This,- he conueived to be the construction of the second deed, and the husband aright bave had good reasons for such a stipulation. - The husband', at the time of exechting the deeds, certainly su - speCted a crimitel intercourse; and it must have required a good dal of invention in time three last witnesses for the Defendant to have made up she story they told ; andi besides, it thev had said what was.tioi true ; Colonel Fuller mi;lit have been called, to contradict them ; and he must have been the most extraordinary man, in the world to allow judgment to go by default against him it he-had been innocent. The rusbanu's ject appeared to- have been to prevent•any inter course between them. that could atibrd an op-portu pity tbr criminality. Mr. Knight seemed to haVe hnagin i ed that, having paid at the rrite of 8001. atter the visits of Colonel Fuller, he had a right to dedua the overplus. 'This, however he could not d 0,.. and therefore the Plaintiff must have a verdict for. the arrears of. the 4001. The Jury immediately found for the •Plaintiff only to the'extent of• the arrears of the inferior' sum of 4001. being 3951. subject to the deduCtion of the In come tax. POLICE. BOW-STREET.—On Thursday evening, John 13alwr alias . Turnwell, was brought before Mr. READ, by Mays, one of the patrole, from the • neighbourhood of Chelsea, charged on susp:cion of being one of the robbers concerned in breaking open the house of the Countess of Morton. M.tys pro duced.a copy of the indiament found ag anst the Prisoner, as being one concerned in the above rob bery. Peter Decaux identified the Prisoner as being • the man against whom he,gave evidence b..fore the Grind Jury, to induce them to find the bill of in diCtment.- The Prisoner Charged the Witness with being . a putter-up, (ore who gives inlbrmation of thieves). Ho was committed for trial. John 'Hosier, late a confidential Clerk in the em ploy of Messrs. Lyne and Donaldson, eminent tai lors, in Cecil -street, - in the Strand,. onder went ano-. ther examination, charged with embezzling various sums of money belonging- to his etnido.) ers. After a long examiniStion, he was cointnitted for trial, for embezzling Al. Bs.-351. dd. (id. and 401. by al tering bills. He was also committed for trial for stealing idol,'hy adding, in tire book of Messrs. Bid di'alph and Co. the Bankers to the Prosecutors, the figure of T.; before 431. thereby Making it 1431. and making it appear in all his accounts ;vitt, his masters, that he had paid in to the Bankers tool'. more than what he had._ . Yesterday, Rowley, the porter, belonging to the White Horse Inn, us Better-lane, who has been in custody several days, on suspicion of being c ncern ed in changing and stealing from a paper parcel, brought by. the Cnichesier.Mail„ an.i sent troin the Chichester Batik to Messrs. Frv, their agents, in St. Mildred's-court, underA ent another examination, when the suspicious circumstance 3 of his running out of the Inn, just alter the Chichester Mail ar rived, ,and going to his lodgings, was fully explain, • , Lt);\ lit :,:l'ill.tett by k cH4,RD li•kgls; of No. 4, martiett-court. Bow-street;: and. pubmhed by WILLIAM ARMIC Ea ScalyPs,;Sottak Maim!' At ale Sup-OFyrct No. llt btracid; where adveztisements, Orders to the Paver,: 1 efeer,s for the Edircr, &c, (t6st-paiil) 1 • mils; ad 'ri'risrt:. COURT OF KING' DEe 23. GORDON AND OTHERS V. TAYLOR AND OTHERS. The ATTORNEY-GRNERAL stated this to be an action for money had and received by the Defendants for the Plaintiffs' use.• There Was a trade carried 'on between the Plaintiffs and MeSsrs. Dick, Orr, And Clark,' , in dollars, which dollars were procured -by them from South Atiet'ica, and which trade was . so.considerable, that the Commission of Dick, Orr, and Clark, charged upon it in 'four months, .was no less than 40,0001. which the Plaintiffs thought too much, and suggested that 20,0001. would 'be suffi dent ; but Messrs. Dick, Orr, and Clark,,a(lhered to their - original charge, upon which the Plaintiffs dis continued dealing with them, and it was determined that they should send home all the dollars,then in . their hat►'ds.,lti hich they said they would, by the first Ship of War that, was not wider •the torce of 30 guns, and wrote to the Plaintiffs. a Letter to that effec:t ; upon which they deducted all the lr home: which ,th claimed, and then scut hOrnti the remainder, being about: 04,000 dollars, to Messrs. Tqlar and Co. their. Agents in tondon,, desiring them, to effcet insurance on this propeity in its pas sag;.i home, and charging the Plaiutiff4 with the.. ex pence of 1.1)4 insurance ; and further direAing Messrs. Tayl , or and Co: the Defendants, not to deli- y'er up these dollars until the Plaintiffs had given them a discharge, and also paid this premium,Ot in surance of 68811 which the Defendants communi cating to the Plamtitfs, they, in orderto get posses sion of these dollars, paid, under a pro►est against the justice of this demand, and alledging that they should -afterwards contest it. • . • . Lord ELLENBOROUGH was clearly of opinion, that there was no pretence WI - resisting this demand for m 4 oey had and received for the ilfaitnitis', use ; the Defendants had their rem?dy over against; Messrs. Dick, Orr, and Clark', and they against the Underw - ritC-r, who had run no ,risk ; for the policy was to, I:Y.:. paid as interest. tnigWapped e. r,. and ther was no interest in . this property iu Dick, Orr, and bliirk. : ---Vernict tor the Piannitis! • • COURT OF CHANCERY, Li•Ncot.N's Dic. 23 , EX-PARTE DE A'DN L, Y. This was a petition, on the - ..art of the Ass:gn es • of the estate of a Bankrupt of t e name of B e tr praying that the of the retilioning end for might be disallowed on the foil eying grounds : this ,creditor had had in his possession a promissory wee of.thebankrtipt's for non!. , inch had nut bee: tire sented for payment for more than six. years prio; to the bankruptcy, nor any of the interest received_ within that time. The Commissinners had aHowed - the petitioning creditor ;to prove this Oebt against the Bankrupt's estate, but the Assig,nees now proved for its e disallowance,pleading the statute of limitations as a n‘ir T to its being received; by tett statute, no 'simple'coetratl debt being recoverable by an attion at ,law, if six years, are permitted to expire be!ote any demand be made, _or acknowledgment of the debt received. • - • - - , This question was argued at considerable leiLnli , on both and 1t was contended by Mr. Tot 4--. ELAN auc, lift C,te petititioping creditor, that the Stn.- foie of Limitations was framed by , the Legislature for. the pe* r tion of indivi(ivals against demands that were staleand ant iquined ; but if the debior .was satisfied that the demand kt,;as just, he was, still bound in hoeOur'and conscience to liquidate it, even.. though_ not recoverable by art anion at law.' Now here .the justice of the debt had not been denied by the Bankrupt, and the Assignees were not entitled to set up the Statute of Limitations as a bar to it, .when it did. not appear that the Bankrupt him,;( if mea , st to resist it on that ground. the Bankrupt Laws weie franyd prior to the S a.o.e of LimitationF., and at a period when debts 'were re coverable at any distance of time. it was tile!) oh)" necessary f r the Vlaintiff, in an action of debt, to set up a claim, and . the Defendant was bound :o skew othat the debt had been Paid, or \kas made liable to .the payment ; but in the Statute - of Limitati ns there was no mention made of debts against the : state of a Bankrt . vt ;.thereforein was to be.presu -ed, that this statute left the law with regard to Bankrupt's debts; as it originally stood.: The great o )jet of this statute was to protect persons against an. .quated demands, which, from the loss of documeets and vouchers, it might not be in their power to s ew that they had paid . ; thus throwing its protection around the proper yof individuals. But the Coon»is , iioneri of Bankrupt were appointed by law to proted the' preperry of the Bankrupt for the behoot of his cre ditors ; and they had allowed of the present claim. On these grounds he trusted that the present appeal frofn the decision of the Commissioners would, not meet,with his Lordship's satiation. - Mr. HART and Mr. IVIADnocKs were beard on tile same 'side. .Sir S. Romtntv, for the Assignees of the Book— rapt, contended, that these Assignees were placed precisely io the situation of tile :Bankrupt ; if the demand via,: not recoverable in law. against the Oat ter, neither„was tt against the former. • It ap;Tared to him that the true policy of the Statute ,of Limi-. tations . had not, been rightly stated by the Gentle men on the other side. That statute had nOt been „ fraW.ed to i):itect individuals against just demands; but.it went upon this fair presumption, that claims ► which had not been made by one patty, nor ac knowledged by "the oilier, within a certain period, wore to be taken as any foundation, and that, in tact, they were no debts . 'at all; Be.,ides, %sett:. it once to be understpo(t that the statute (111 not, bar clanns upon tbe est.itc o!' a Bankri,lpt not made, withof the limited • period, it wasqUite evi dent that cooseqeences- of the most melancholy *t fatal description- would ensue._ There vets herdlY any man who- had • been • lene engaged in trade' against whom a Commission of Bankrupt might not be taken out on debts long since paid,' and et which the vouchers had been 'destroyed, on the faith ;hat the Statute of Limitations was 'a bar to all claims after a certain period.. rtiaj'i. in this case, even a person who had long. retired from trade might be' made a B.tnkrupt to-morrow- on claims contracted .20 years . ago, and . t he Vouchers for the liquidation of which bad been destroyed, or had perished." It such were the consequences which might be expected to ensue from such doctrine as that maintained on the other side, certain he was that his Lordship would pause before he gave his sanction to it. He should therefore siale.nit that the Assignees were perfectly right in resisting this claim. The LORD CHANCELLOR said he would deliver his decision on the question to-morrow. . , . el, ley hiR only rgri home for his g.:( at co3f; lie was of vourse discharg d.--The *ay the rubbery was ceiiithiftVd;Terri it s still a mystery. MAqt..ll:;r9U , ; charge rif robbery and fraud tvas instetced at this °thee ,yestertlay, 1•1 Y Nrr. i.ietkeley-scpti.re,. against house' keyper. It appeared that sue snspicinns bad arisen • unfavourable. to the prisoner, IA it , :se name • and eons - c ine:lov she had rather a ,:ridden warning. • giyen to w r .,• On Wednesdays evening,: a woman of, the name of Fit ztTcrald:called for a basl:et, w hiclt she Was conveying otit of the pri , oner - -s- room, wheti ;he eircumstaiiec Je.no - mad 1:;:3owp t her tress. the footman was ordered,to.stop it.- In doing' • SO, the, Prisoner snitched a• large parcel frorrr,the basket, and, carried it. into her room, and the contents were examined, when Several articies„ ll 2C: property ot A. were cnn•ained therein. _Other. charges we'e preferred ap_; : ar,s.t her.for m; tit, in receiving sums money weekly, for th e ' payment of tradesmsen's biils, which she had newer' disehargod. The piisoner, in her., defence ,to this char, , ,e, said, that_she had -enfi» - tunately lost both Money and bills, bet thciaght it would be impruden t to:acquaint the family, as she wAs possessed 'of means to satisfy the 't rade,s,felk at t het:in:la the yer - The prisoner seemed so disregard' . tea wet-63:11100 5,- until was delitered to the g'aoler, there was a visible eliaft;e in liertnifn;iier ch:poi - twat - She was resnande.! f:r another e%a mival ,8 N y•-• . GRAVESEND,. 117.CFNIHER 22. 1- , ;!seci by'—the Speedwell., Hiaringtith, horn Waterrtrcti° aid the. Sir. IV ilhaiti Chnstopha, (win F el pol. . JURY esterday, the.T.ady of Geurge' Todd, Es q . of TlV'csizei I latupsti.-ad, (!k a 5:,1),. ) 11 , 1 1W: Ifi 13, In March last, at. Ilarielly, Willian'Steer, Est,, eldest si,n of Cnarles•Steei, Esq., o.:‘ , ),;slkire•t<4" 4 re' !°', Miss f: ne'Watson, dauzliier of Coloic:: Watson, of NJ.' tine Infantry'. In April last, Lieutenant Thomas Dickenson,. of the Et': gineers, in the Flon. ha Cumpariy's SerVice, to N l !''' Catherine Dem. • • •L- • ••On Thursday last, at Christ Church, Szrrev, Mr. born, of Holborn-Inii, Silk-in4.:reer, to Mrs. Dann., of S ug- ' derland. The snine day, at Mitcham, Mi. Ge'crgeAsh:t&i-Sea - f .C3I " . eat9ii-strcet r tu,Miss Ratter, it , , • pit a. • • - On th 6 r9th - Of May last, at 13orrityay, CiTtain Izo- - r Frame, soil of the Itiw. Nir. lames Era:he, - late Mm.l.,ler .4116 a, • Ou Thttfsday the isth inst. at h;.r - hot::i,e' 1).,. ,- .l;:‘Ou z !'il place, heath; Mrs. Laura IViar'ht Finringt6n,' tv o2 Captain Farrington,. of the Royal Re , ,.;iineut of A ftili-r;1, aged 24 years. • ti On Wednesday last. aged 36 yeaTs, at Hackney; M J r.' ' a '- %Villis; of Adam's-court; P!'oad,rreet. • 0 n Thursday last, at her S'.intharapton, t Vo . " . agcy Lady Shelley. • . the 21st 111 St. at Ham- theint,.• ion or NI itj,r Mosey, of the I.lisroloyd 63, P R IV EV F TOCAS . ~ Es.TERnAy. Ilank - Stock; 10i0 Sf-ck, _ Navy c pet Cert. Shut •• !' 44. 3s. SS• pr . 5 1 r J.,;;;;, pr• 4 Per Cent. ()yit 1, }il s.* • I<ea. 6cF,'R • Vfmlle'rr... C c.nt. • 3 per :2ent. •t:;s. snot I Cor,:•,. Jul ith111; 1.. Ann. IS 1-163 - 11 C;11 ‘vATE'R'AT t.m:;)()N: Row. h.l.drning,•3s min. after 7, I Afternobn,. aft or Morning, a 6 min. after 8..1 Alitllic.on, 57 nun. a fter E. r~~ ~~ L. To TIIONI.IS TA V l.t)ic • , No. 9, New Bridge-Street, London. Honoured Sir, March IX tee (11-8 , ,T.BEG leavO to inform yon, that ever since year 17 9 0, - 1' have been a ttiicic,/ e flit the LuesVer ic ;i : rea ; • which ; fium its obstinately resistirig , ev,'!ry coarse prestribed by the' inoq. eminent rat y a ucsitY nere, r.xl undere,omg• sev._;ral see re courses or sativati‘Pv and discharged trim the 11, with little icl ic7f wo; , lti appear to he of- the- most inveterate nature. 11l spling or last year Inv thsoi4ler' had got.- to such a I t tet,-a s neniy-to put....a period to rue exi: - ..ten,e-- ;tad a large on the Crown of thy head,',,ne on each arm, and toy were broke out in-a frightfol 'nzanner ; , ;hy right was d;clu i. ,,'"' fully painful, atd had becti in a state of ulceration-for,""1, last seven years ; my left lied als, tee large n,aks do Was very much di,teoloure4, and gave me such excrutiat' inr pah., partienlarly when warm in as nearly dc ' . prive me of rest ; in this lathentable state, I was re , .:0 11 : mended by Mr. 1. TnompAoo, (who received s 9 cure them here), to rake your, Leake's )!'c:tent - which 1 bean to i,t• •on the 16th or May ; in the coilfi of a...fortnight, 1 hegait tv IC - c,1i , 11 henetit--in little 111 0 ,7 d than a month, the nicer, , on_ 'ily heed and ar:ns . „cl, 4 soh filly h e aled --soon atter, thes es on , my rl o3 `;,'A - also ; leaving, however, consi.ier;;Y ~ ; di sco li,,, rat ,u in o`7 and pain in the lame-oh the left, which, by the !ile W. sing of God, sod litti , • longer peis...verance yourplii triable Medicine, subsided ; the nodys disper.,M; ; ,' regaining its natural hue, and tho,nd,"l:irnal pains grA1 4 .,.... going olf. thus became, ,your liberal, ad , iice ;1;R I perfe:tly free fro' o ail my former coniplain,' br have recovered my tanner spirits and strength, atyl 5,11 „„y come jolly an nd' tat, in whic state iniiingcontnwed months to the astonishment. of all who knew,ine,l iiT ;t , a loss in what terms to express my zratitn,le, but for the good of other stilt:-ring iri:‘,rtals, to mal;e illy case as public as possible ; as shall on ev,•ry in so noing, you .Sir; .yonr L i obedivnt; very humble ~.stain, EX. :!;; - • Swan's Lioze„lli e .;ll. : strect., witnessLi,-;1•,, - 10 1 1 N T 110 M P SON, NO. 3, i'n.,•pareq and. T 110 MAS •••• ilt '• • VCher•VA :!!1: 1 1 ; his .• batters 111 c administers t i . i l:••• eSteLITniA, b) a • • ci:nn at LiinablL: „wd • -PC 0 , AISO Sohl, by t ..t_ those at . a tit:.t:lnce, at ti,e • All)an's-Str,et, ;. the ; ; !sir. Stcri's, Buckselier, it:11 Bitxtef's, donald, Glasgo‘v ; Bill- 1 one every consii.tt it; 1,,1111 ill C.; f;:-1. -;'' ,;1).• in onli• :IS Q.! t.'", - ,,2;• an:i plain dif•-ecti,ris, cure theriiieives I'4. I:".v,ry s ••••' • ' " ‘Niiir.±l, by (3.`..'Cii 01 4, prii,led. at tttc c)ilice----" i , :tX-it•l'ect„"-- to wilith is , , ,1•; - arc Lounterreits.