The Sun. — London, England, 1809-12-26 00:00:00

Aii IN• wed this to be an is - • • e r Ceutt of Chancery, tor. Abe tee owe; •-t feet, whether -a prounis ;..• e 7 e w oy fte deietichiot to the plaineff, • .se e .Id. The shdrt history.of the caie rwee; ten,.---The - Mr, Willan, kept the Bull and Keith inn, 'a wrtl-kootvn house in the City, ana he was concerned in the Leeds mail-coach. The. de:a:Klein weea brewer, at Dunstable, and provided provender for the mail-coach horses there, as they passed through that town to Leeds. The plaintiff aad defendaol lead :Icel./tuns tegether on the subject of the provender with whiclfthe horses' were pro vided ; these accounts were; puled monthly. In the . year 1794 the business between the plaintiff and the defendant was broken off, and then - thew,, was a. set-. dement of their accounts as to this business, but; the plaintiff had advanced to the defendant 2001: for which -he gave his promissory note. In the year '1796 this note became due, and an agreement teok place between these parties in which this note was taken notice of, but remained Unpaid. The plaintiff had afterwarels tie mischance to lose this note, and when he called on ti:e defendant to pay the note, the plaintiff, not being able to produce it; and Itaving some reason to distrust thedefendant; did nut like to let him know that the note was lost, and therefore wrote to hint for the payment of the sum due upon it, without mentioning the note itself; but he could not get it paid. Lu this situation the plaintiff' was under the necessity of taking some means to infoiee payment of this money by' the defendant, but here was a difficulty. He could not recover this debt in a Court of Law, for it had been held by his Lord ship now upon- the Bench, and so it had by Chief Justice Mansfield, that it an' action be brought upotl a promissory note, the plaintiff cannot recover the money without producing the note, -however clearly • he may be able to prove it to have been lost ; and a great deal of good sense ther e was in that decision, however hard it might be upon such a laintiff', bee cause a promissory note payable to orde p r sva, a oego. viable instiument, and unglit, although the plaintiff had lost it, get into the hands Of a third person, who would be entitled to sue the drawer upon it, iwo that it the drawer were to pay the person to whom by gave such'uote, he might be called upon to pay the same money twice. At law, theretore, there was no remedy for such a case as this, but in a Court of Equity there was s —for in that court, the Chancel lor had power to order the money to be paid, on the plaintiff giving to the defendant security- to return the money in case the note should be presented by any body for payment. The plaintiff had therefore recourse to a Court of Equity in his case, andethe Chancellor bad sent this case here to try the fact, whether .the defendant had, or lied not, paid t o. the plaintiff the sum of money was due up on this note. The question-was now In be ttied up on the present aftion, to, which the - defendant had plAided the g e neral issue, end also the statute of li mitations; the meaning of v.hich was, that, whe ther lie had paid the debt . or not, he had not under taken to pay it within six years next before the time cf bringing this action ; but lie should prove that the statute of limitations .slid not apply to this case, because the defendant had said, long wiihm six years, that he had paid the note; that let in proof that he had not dune so, and in answer to the letter sent to him by the plaintiff's attorney, the de fendant had written a - letter, Which contained the following sentence : ' " Gentle Men, you May • assure Mr. Willan that, on the delivery of his accounts, if any thing I owe him, he shall be paid, but I expe& he is "in my debt." This put an end to thestatute of limitations, for it let in evidence to shew whether the defendant was in theplaintiff's debt or' not. - The defendant find proved in his answer in Chancery, that, in the year 1796, a settlement of accounts took place be tween Lim and the plaintiff it the plaintiff's.house, and that the note for 2.001. was taken into that ac count, but that the plaintiff', not being able to find Wintered into an agreement with the defendant to deliver it up to him, and caused his clerk to make a memorandum to that pact% which he din accord ingly, and the plaintiff signedind delivered it to the defendant ; .hut having to remove from Dunstable to Exeter, he had lost or mislaid diet. memorandum.— Now the plaintiff's clerk would swear that he never . made any such memorandum, and that, this sum of 2001. was never an item in the settlement of these accounts ; that it was a matter holy unconneaed, with, separate and distinat - frotn, the business about the mail coach-horses' provender, which was settled monthly bet wveen these parties ; that this note had never been paid, and that therefore, the Jury would find their verdia for, the plaintiff. The defendant's auswer in Chancery, was then read, stating, that this settlement had taken place between the parties, and that this nefe was included in that settlement ; that the plaintiff could not' find ir,and caused his clerk to write a n - tetnotand4ru, which be did," and the plaintiff signed and (layered it to the defendant,, which memorandum the defendant had lost by moving from Dunstable to Exeter, ace. Nathan Sill, the plaintiff's clerk, proved the na ture of the business between these parties to be as the Attorney-General had opened; but that he, the witness, was never present at any time when there was an account settled between the plaintiff and the defendant, in which the note of 2001. made a part, or in which it was made a part of the conver eation on the settlement of accounts; nor did Mr. Willan (the plaintiff) ever say to the defendant (Mr. Perkin) that he had lost Mr. Parkin's note of hand, and that he should give it up when he found it ; nor did Mr. Willan, in the presence of the witness, sign ar-y agreement, nor did Mr. Willan ever direct the witness to prepare such an agreement oe memoran dum ; nor did the witness ever hear - of such an agreetnent, until the defendant had. set up such a • thing in the Court of Chancery. No pail of this story about the agreement was here. The witness said he knew Mr. Perkin to be a eleedy man, and thought it likely that he w..uld take advantage of the accident if he knew flat the • note was lost. The witness did not know, the exact time when , it was LONDON : Priz ted by RI CHARD HARit; u ? ./No, q, 141artittt-Lmlit, 1 ovv:street ; ana I'v:3,: , !led lay \VII.: ARMIG ER SCRIPPS, Smith - Molton.streeti G tyivato .s44‘, At tbs SuN-Opiicp,No. 312, Strascl) where Acive , liJezents) Orchcrs for ttic: Lv.ffrs t r ot the foitor, titc. (post-paia), mot addresse.d ~-:-.~-.y. ~::.:~ 5: .)tivoti • '.c:;t, but believed it was not lost when Mr. Parkin wa* in town about the time it became due, which .cas io, th 2 inonth of ,Nov. 1796. The . witness had itaxched 'tor the note a.. great many times, li - ut a was unabie to find.-it. The. witne , ,s had ;erice a conversation with the dafendant in tite,early part of . the year 17945 there Was a bill drawn; by Mr Par kin, the defendant, on the plaintiff,"whiCh had not been duly attended to, for he was then in the plain - tiff's debt, on .which occasion, said the witness, Mr. Parkin was very much out of humour at the circum- . stance, and „insisted 'that the state of pis accounts, \va , i such that the bill - ought to have been accepted. I then told hint, .notwithstanding what he asserted about the state of his accounts, lie was aware that he owed 'Mr. Willan a considerable sum of money More than Was on the face of that account : he said, " that was nothing_to me, that was between Mr. Willan and him, and I had nothing to dO with it ; that I, had nothing to do with any thing but the ac counts before me." ,These coach accounts did not include the note in question. Cross-examined by Mr. GURNEY. He said that the defendant was in the habit of transmitting bills and drafts, and making other re-. Mittancesp the plaintiff, to take up his (the de-• iendant's) acceptances -in . town. The defendant's letter, in answer to that of the plaintiff's attorney, demanding payment of this money, was then read; it contained the following expression, as opened by the - Attorney-General You may -be assured, that, on delivery of his (Mr. Willan's) account, if I. owe him - any. thing, - he shall be paid ; but I expel he is in my debt." Mr. GURNEY addressed the Jury for the defend ant. He submitted it to be an extraordinary thing, that this note was not demanded payment of when it became due ; or that Mr. Willan had not taken care to pay himself in the course of the account which he had with Mr. Parkin, and that no 'pay ment had been demanded from the year 1796 lc, the'year 1805. Lord ELLENEOROUGH, Laving , summed up the evidence to 'the Jury, left it to them to say whetho they belieted the evidence of the defendant's an swer in Chancery, in.which he had sworn that he had paid the note; or that of Mr. Sill, who posi tively contradioted it, and who sWore • positively that no such convetsatiwi as that related by the defend ant ever took place; nor did any such agreement as he referred to take effeet.—Verdid for the BARLOW V. MACKINTOSH. Mr. ATTORNRY-GRNBLAL staid, that this was 3.n anion on a policy of insurance on goods, in a vessel which went on a voyage from hence to Holland, by license of his Majesty, under his sign manual; it was on goods; if they should be lost between Dunkirk and the Weser.—Now he had nothing to prove, but that. Rotterdam was between Dunkirk and the Weser ; for the vessel was seized there, and the goods confiscated. The vessel was afterwards restored, but the goods ' were not. - The Captain proved that fa& and the license was produced ; but it was not proved that the li ce! ate was aaually granted to the party who held it ; and therefore Lord EI:LENEOROUGH held, that this license would not do ; and it would be extremely dangerous to give, it effect, v.;ithout prOof ; it V( as given byt`ie Crpwn to the inaividual who held it ; for then any person, who obtained a license, might sell'it to any body else, wilum the Crown had it : nor in .COHletll - to trust ; or the person who had it might lose it' out of his pocket, and any body who might pick it up, might trade with it, contrary to the will of the Crown ; and therefore the plaintiff must be called (nonsuited.)—Plaintiff nonsuited. LLOYD AND ANOTIIBB V. REEVES AND OTHERS. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said, that the plaintiffs, in this case, were mechanics,, as ingenious as any in .the business which they followed, which-was . that of coppersmiths; and they had :done a great' deal of business for the defendantu2‘whO were the Britigh Copper Company, and who bald converted the 'II,AILs at Walthamstow into 'copper The - plaintiffs work had been applied to the s heathing Of King's ships ,- whiehlad met the ap probation of naval officers, whose approbation could never be obtained upon such a subjed as this,. withourdeserving it. But the defendants re sisted .this detnand. The truth was, that the affairs of the Coin an were to the - management of a committee-7the' worst mode in the world of con dutling_ business, because there would always be 'some individuals upon such an establishment who would feel a disposition, because they felt an interest in disputing claitns made upon the Company ; and a committee could never be so minutely in - ion - nett as a single individual would be, who had the undivided care of his own interest. So it happened here ; and that was the reason why the plaintiffs demand was disputed. He could ptove his whole cast-, although a 'long one. Every thing; was in'his favour, and all the tlifficulties were in the Way of the defendants.— ' Bdt, however, as it was desirable that whoever should decide this subject, should first view the mills, which the Jury had no opportunity of doing, as the question Would involve a consideration of the prin ciple and power of mechanics-; also, perhaps, some points of law. He thought it advisable that it be referred to a person•who united in 'his own person a considerable knowledge of the powers ot nrecha , 'nits, and of law; these were united in his learned friend,'Mr. Bolland; and therefore, he proposed to refer the whole of this question to that 1 4 - rned Gentleman, to which Mr. Park 11:insetted, on the part of the defendantS.—Referred to Mr• Bolland. ...••••••11rnme COURT OF COMMON TLEAS; Dim. 23. GOODALL ESQ. 11. COUSINS.-SAME V. FALS6UAVI - - The fats of this case have been repeatedly before our readers, wbo will recoiled that policies to the amount of 30,0001. had been effeted,by the plaintiff Mr. Goodall (the Admi - al of Hayti); - on the ship' Earl Bathurst and her cargo, frotn St. Domingo to Loridun. The cargo consisted of cotton, and had been shipped by General Christopbe (the'President of Hayti), un Mr. Gonclall's account, 'in - beceniber, 808, at which. time it will be reeolleaed that Mr. Goodall had been sent home a stateipris,oner.from the West Indies,. and on his arrival relewJed and, as was stated, an anion is now pending to re- cover. dattia‘ , es fot thee , p,eriecntiou he 'err:it:treat-irk consequence of that violent mid illegal seizure of his person. , The anions against the Underwriters were brought on the score of barratry. Nowel, the Master, instead of bring the ship and carp, accmdiog to' her _ destination, to London, having sold that part of her'' • 'cargo,. which consisted of cotton, at Bee mudae'and taken the: ship to Baltimore, where be lendekthe t coffee.. A few days after the. arrival. of the ship at Baltimore, newel died. The principal ground of defence - set up by. the Utide!*rilers was, that a persop of the name. of Grogaod was Mr. Goodall's_ Supercareo, and the ship was taken to Baltimore by him, and not by Nowel, the Master.• The Underwriters also endeavoured to shelter themselves. upon the grounds that the. ship had made deviations, and thet she - was not sea worthy. for want of suffiCient. provisions ; ita. all of Which they failed. Mr. Fletcher, the plaintiff's attorney, and manager'"" , for all his concerns in Efigland, having proved that the witneses, examined on the former trials were DOW abroad, their eVidence was read by consent from the Judge's notes, iii addition to which, the first mate of the Earl Bathurst, . who had arrived since the former trialsewes examined on the part of the plaintiff It appeared 'that Grogand was merely a passenger on board the ship, • and that he was entered as such in the log-kook, and thht there were sufficient provi sions to carry the ship to England: Notwithstanding the plaintiff, Mr. Goodall,. bad obtained several verdids, and a numerous body of the Underwriters had settled the loss, others persevered. in defending the actions, and the above causes oc e cupied the attention of the Court the whqle of Fri-, - day and Saturday, and excited a - considerable degree of interest. As the principle in the issue has been decided by these successive verdicts in favour of Mr. Goodall. • the defeat of the Underwriters is complete.—Al though Mr. Goodall .himself - is in the West . Indies, his cause, far from suffering by his ab sence, seems to have been managed with great zeal and ability. Mr. Serjeant SHEPHERD, in a most animated strain of impressive eloquence, 'vindicated his cliept from all the aspersions of his antagonist, challeng ing any and all of Mr. Goodall's enemies to adduce a single fact in impeachment of Gor;dall's com mercial ur naval history, or any transaction of his life that could gloss the' sort of defence that had been attempted. The Underwriters produced no evidence, al though their Counsel, Mr. Serjeant COCKELL, con tended for his Clients with the utmost earnestness, ingenuity, and ability.--These verdicts have settled this long expensive lidgation. IIANSON V A TRINS. • This-was an nalon by the plaintiffs, the oviners of certain-goods on board a vessel called the Sally, against the defendant, as owner of the vessel called the Mary-Ann, for the damage done to- the pro perty of the plaintiff on board the Sally, in coase quence of the Mary Ann running foul of her, by . which the cargo -Was greatly damaged. It appear ed, that in the passage of boilt vessels'op - the'llivet, the Sally• had laid to in consequence of being hailed by the boat of the quarantine ship, She had been in this situation for about a quarter of an hour, when the Mary Ann corning up in full !mit, wind and tido. favouring - , the people on board not keeping a . proper look nut, she ran fbul of the Sally, which occasion ed her to 'sink some time after. The cargo 'was • . got out, but greatly damaged. This statement was endeavoured to be controverted by the pilot on board of the defendant's vessel, but without effeet.—Ver di& for.the plaintiffs damages 10001. subje& to a reference to Mr. Waddington to ascertain the, amount. C.4I4IIPELL V. ATKINS. Ibis was another of an exatily similar nature, and n which a Similar verciiet was given. A gentleman .has lately published in a Medical Journal some observations which demonstrate the extraordinary effects of carrots in the cure of sores and ulcers, by correcting their morbid disposition. The method of preparing the roots is as follows The .c i arrots, having been previously cleaned by scraping and washing, are cut into transverse .slices and boiled till quite tender ; after which they . ate taken on of the water, and beaten in a runoff, to the ep!': -lince of a , soft pulp. This may.eittift appli . ;1 4 . 'Aportions with the hand, and kept on with a cloth or roller, or it may be spread upon a clotlfi, and laid on like a common poultice. It is best when fresh prepared, anit i should be changed twice a day. This simple applicalion corrects the fcttor of iil-con= ditioned sores, )educeS them to a perfect healthy, or good-conditioned state, and thickens and nishes tWscharge. METH4I4OR PIIRtARING AROMATIC VINEGAR. —Take of common 'vinegar any quantity ; .mix a sufficient quaniity of powdered chalk, or common whiting wi:h it, to •destrOy the.acidity.. Tji.en let the white matter subside, and pour , off the'insipid .supernatant liquor; afterwards let the white powder be dried in the open air, or by a fire. When it is dry, pour upon it sulphuric.acid (full of . vitriol) as ,the white and fumes continue to ascend. Stone,ves sels are the properest to be used on this occasion, as the acid will not act upon them. The product is the Acetic Acid, known in the shops by the name of Aromatic Vinegar. , Several German artists have of lot: turne.l thtiieat tention'to the art of painting on 'glass. Professor Fiick, of Berlin, has made great iniprovefnews in the burning of pietures in glass, and has recently fit,ishod a beautifully painted window for theeatholic church in that city. Bubier, of Weal, its Wirteuiberk, also burns colours in glass so' exquittely„: that 'his works are not to be distinguished tom the best of the anciehts. _ . The expre.ssedjuice of the bating .bas beep some time used at Issoudun, department of India, in dying. The root of the plant boiled in ,water gives a beautiful green, applicable to goat and sheep skins. A shoemaker, named Easton, has been committed to Lincoln gaol, charged with stealing a pig .from Mr. Chapman, its that neighbourhOod.!Th'e prisoner was detedeti in consequence of Mr. C. hayi.ig traced the (06:StepS of the pig from his sty to E•JS',;.)4'spre mises, a distance of more than three miles. PART NERIIIPS D iSSOLVED. Thtirms Chamhdrl:iyne, ‘Villiains, and Shirley Forster, ofG feat Cninietkind.strert. - Mcllin4 and Roge;,RoSkell, of Preston, Lancastor, dealers in colours. Walter Vavasour, of Heath; York, Thomas Eipp'on Vava ' V - our, and Joseph Tom'inson, of Rochdale, Lancaster, and Walter Vavasour, , oftatton, Norrolk, woolstaplers. Robert Boyle an.' !oho Crompton; of Upper Thames- st :eet, stationers. William Cotton and lohn Cobb, of CoMmerce-roW, friars-row, cabinet-makers. Samuel 'Abbott and Francis Phillips, of Wcxxi-street, g.rodrs- Matthew Deere Percival, sen. Matthew Percival, jun. and John. Perciv.al, of Oxford-wrier, oil ;II d colourmen. lames Taddy t lames Butt, lohn. Capel H., nhvay , 'lames Thomas, and Charles Beazley, of Cray's, Essex, pa Atile:end, Clapton, and Hackney, hrick-makels. Jonathan Gwilliant and Charks,Gwilliarn, of Saint Cathe rine, victuallers`, Solomon George Shaw and Solomon Shaw, of St. Alban's, printers. Isaac Smith, Edward Smith, and George Smith, of Dews. bury, York, woolstaplers. SHIP IvrIWS. GRAVE•SgND, DECEMBER 24. A rill/al—the Young Henry, Walter, trout Oporto; and the Sarah, Henderson, frorn•Quebec. . Sailed—the. Edystone, Bruce, and Minerva, Madis, for Lisbon; Albion, Nicholson, for Demerara; Thetis,. Saved ' for Jamaica; and Ihit Economy, Hall, for Cadiz. B On the isth inst. 'at Aaosi Park, the Lady of C. W. Wil. Hams Wynne, - Esq. of a Daughter. On Thursday the zest inst. at C,uckney, in the County of Nottingham, the Lady of the Hon. Mr. Monckton, of a Son. On Saturday morning last, at Castlehyde, the Hon: Hyde,' Of a San. - - Yesterday, at her father's house, No. z 6, Bedford-piaci, the Lady of Major Parry, of a Daughter. MARRIED, On Saturday the iith inst. at Fairfield, in , the County. 4 Dublin, Philip Lynch Athy; Esq. of Renville, in the Coun ty of Galway, to Miss Mac Donnell, eldest daughter of Ran. dle Mac. Donnell, .Esq. of A ilen's-coutt, Dublin. On Monday, at Wilton Church, ;oho, second son of iolut flosken, Esq. of Catines, in the County of Cornwall, 10 Miss Harper, daughter of William Ilatixr,, Esq. of .Everrons Liverpool. • . , At Westbury, Mr. 'lathes Perry, jun. to Miss Rich, of Stoke's Croft. Mr. fames 'Murray, of PAcery, in the County of Down , ;to Miss k:mily Crook, only daughter of the late - Or. Croak, of Morgan. DIAL). On Saturday lasi, after a long and painful illness, Edmuitict Walker, Esq. of Chancery-14ne. On Stinday,se \ rmight, at Daudish, MTS. Brunton, wife:ff Lieuteriant-Ccioncl Iliunton, late Military Auditor-Genera' at Ivlatiru. - At lir. Alexander Adam; the venerable Iteaos of the High School. of On the t3th inst. suddenly, Francis florpfray, the Hyde, near Stourbridge, brothcr to Sir I. Horilfray, 1 11 , 7 ' Sherillof Glamorgatishire, and to.S. Hot:gray, two'. kc" nydarran Merthyr. Lately, at Westnicad, the seat of Lord Kensington, 4 43 5/ 19, Alas Hassall, daUghter of Charles ii4b3411, i,51.1. 0 J - Eastwonci, Pembrokeshire. LONDON MAKKETS, RETURN OF WHEA By Mesas. CAI Li) and M Nein - jug only from aKreeably t , L 205 Quarters at od 150 ----- at its, od 37 ------- at ii4s ad 38 at Ails ed Jl6 283 -at arts ad 5-a o9s od too 2Q2 at 107 s ad 391 ,at io6s od 336 And 220 Quarters a 'lota: 7,867 Quarter, 2s. 4(1. higher LT IN MARK-LANE, A 1.1. A S y i4l eat Weigi►els, Dec. ii, tuDec. '6. :o the Act. 366 Quarters at 1,4 s ad 787 -------- at 1:,36 otl ~4 ----- at to 2s-oti 394 1(96 at toos od 198 400 at 0 , ai 302. - 5 94 757 at 95s 0 4 51 -- at tpa bd o d 8 9 2 6 S . -- pet Quaratet 4s t r. i.—Avetage tots. than last Return. A R ETU RN OF FLOUR, . :o Dec.. 35, from the Cocker-Office: Sacks. s. u. Sacks. F• S 4 93 0 I 45 - 20 sa 6 301 ---- 9° 100 --- gz o 141 } • 27 -- r 6 lz 3 0 a acks. =Average 445. 60. per Saa... lower than last week.. From Dec. 9, t Sacks.. s. d. 38 ---- 100 0 1 5 99 0 I 9673 95 58t - 94 Total--11,619 sa Red Clover - • white ditto - - Trefoil It y e-C rass - White Mustard Seed. 13rown ditto - Turnip •- SEEDS. - ios. od. tQ 14 7 5. do. -‘ Sas. od. to [3,,5. do. 205. od. to 745. do. • 305. od. to sos. quarter.. Ss, ed. to 125. od. bush o • 365. od. to 20s. od. • 16s. od. tolzjs. do. PRICE OF HOPS. • BAGS. POCKETS. Kent, 41. tos. to I. iss. Kent, 41. os. to 61.11 05 1 Sussex, 41. os. tv,SI. os. Sussex, 3 1 . ifs. to 41- 55 Essex, 41. es. to 51. os. Farnham, 81. —s. to zit. *s• NEWGATE AND LEADENHALL MARKETS. By tiae Carcase. - Beef 35. Bd. to Ss. od. Veal Als. od. Co 6s. 6 c h Mutton 4s. 4d. to ss. 44. 1 Pork 6s. 4d. to 7s. 4(11 _ - -- PRICE OF LEATHER (per lb.) AT LEADENIIA Of* Butts, so to 561 b. each - -22 d. to :.3d. Ditto, 56 to 661 b. each . 0 24d. to 2.6 d. Merchants' Backs, - - - 2 id. to 2zd. Dressing Hides, .. - - ad. to 1 90 0 Fine Coach Hides, - - - ' JO. to zid• Crop Hides, 35 to 401. b. for cutting -17 d. to I9P ie Ditto, '45 to 501 h. .. - WO. to Sad. Calf Skins, 30 to 401 b. 28d. te pd. par lb. Ditto, 50 to 7olb. 34d. to 40d. per lb. Ditto, 70 to Ifolb. 34d. to 39d. per lb. Small Seals (Greenland) 35. od. to 3s, 2d. per lb. Large ditto, - loos. to tos. per doz. •RAW I-1113k.5. Best Heifers & Steers,(per st.) Ordinary 2S Od t4:l os. .0d 2$ 3d to 3s od Market Calf 14$ od each Middlings zs 4ct to as id Eng.,Horse iss od to t 65 0 1 Sheep Skins - • - 3s od to is 9 d --........0 PRICE OF St.James,s Market-ss. oil. dt ire Market _ SS. frt. whitechap.Matket ss. ow per stone gfSlth TALLOW. Town Tallow 86s. od. Yellow Russia B§S. Sts. White do. 86s. od. os,od , Soap do. 85s. —s.,od. MeitlnOtuit 7os. —S. co' Ditto rough sos. —s. =s• Graves 14s. od. Good Driegs • i4s. od. otOed, rigs. • 135..6::. —Moulds 14$. id. Iss. id. Average price ss. Yellow Soap, tots.—Mo Price of Candles per dozen, St. lAMES's HAY •NIARKET, Otc. 25, , Hay, 31., iss. od. to 61.. 6s..od. — Aver . S i. S. 0".. Straw, -211. as. od.. to 2L. Ifs. 0 0.--Avet. 21. 6i, 6c.t. WHITECHAPEI. HAY MARKET. Hay 41. tos. od. to 61. 6s. od.—Aver. 51. Ss. O Nes 01. os. od. to 01. os. od.— Aver. os. Od d• Clover s 61. los. od. to 71. t6s. od.— Aver. 6 i. 1. IS•fi Strw.v, ti. 18s. ed. to 21. 6s. od.—Aver. 21. 25. ed. PRICE OF COALS fti THE POOL. Newcastle, 52.5. eel. tki 745. 6d. —SundeFland, its. to 5