The Sun. — London, England, 1836-04-11 00:00:00

sECON i) EDITION. SUN OFFICE, Seven o'clock. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT, (THIS EVENING.) HOUSE OF COMMONS. Tl.e SPEAKER took the chair shortly beorc four o'clock. Mr. Crafer, from the Treasury, presented papers. ISLINGTON MARKET BILL. Mr. HAWES presented a pet tion from Lambeth, complaining of the Islington Market Amendment Bill. The petitioners stated that the effect of the Bill was to destroy the Islington Market altogether, and that if it was allowed to piss, the petitioners would be most materially injured, if not ruined. -The Hon. Member considered the petition well worthy the attention of the House. EASTERN RAILWAY BILL. Mr. ROSS presented a petition from an individual named Walker, against the Eastern Railway Bill. DUNDEE AND NEWTYLE RAILWAY BILL. On the Juotion of Mr. HALIBURTON, the Dundee and Newtyle Railway Bill, the Dundee Harbour Bill, and the Dundee Water Works Bill were severally read a second time, and ordered to be committed. MR. BUCKINGHAM'S CLAIMS. Colonel THOMPSON presented a p2tition from hull in fa..vour of MSWAr. Buckingham's claims. NSEA HARBOUR. On t;:e motion of Mr. J. H. VIVIAN, the Swansea Harbour Dill, an'l the Newport Harbour Bill, were seve rally read a ..i:.cond time, and ordered to be c rnmitted. DUBLIN STEAM PACKET COMPANY. Mr. EWART' presented a petition from Liverpool, praying to be heard v Counsel against the Dublin Steam Packet Company's Bill. HODGE'S DIVORCE BILL. On the motion of Mr. TOORZ . , this Bill, as well as Hicks's Name. Bill, were severally read a Second time, at ordered to be committed on Friday. EASTERN COUNTIES RAILWAY. Mr. TOOKE presented a petition from Messrs. Ban tom and Co. against this Bill. CHESHIRE RAILWAY. Lord SANDON presented a petition from an indivi dual of the name of Brooke against the Bill for making a railway from Manchester to Chester. FOLKE'S NATURALIZATION BILL. On the motion of the NOBLE LORD this Bill was read a second time. HERIOT'S HOSPITAL BILL. Mr. FERGUSON presented a petition from an indivi dual, against certain clauses of this Bill. STAMP DUTIES UPON NEWSPAPERS. Colonel THOMPSON presented a petition from Hecklestone, praying for the total abolition of the Stamp Duties upon Newspapers, and also for the release of the per3ons who were PiOOmprß LAWSisoned for the violation of those laws. BILL. Mr. HAWES had a petition to present which ha d been agred to at a very numerous and respectable meeting of h,s' constituents, expressing in the strongest terms their dissatisfaction with the working of the Poor Law Bill. He need hardly s:tY he entertained the highest respect for the petitioners, but, on this subjct he felt bound to say that he entirely differed froin them. When the Bill of which the petitioners complained was introduced he (Mr. Hawes) had been among st those who gave it a warm and steady support, and h continued bnause he saw that it had worked the greatest possible good.—(Hear, hear, hear.) He was sorry to see the petitioaers in the absence of information, for he supposed they could not have had the most accurate information on the subject. He was sorry that, in the absence of such informai:on, the peti tioners should have thought it necessary to characterize this Bill as one which they viewed with horror and disgust. It also stated that the agricultural labourers were greatly in jured by the competition of Irishmen, who came over to this country. He (Mr. Hawes) believed that the competi tion spoken of was rather beneficial than otherwise. On the whole, he wished to present the petition with the greatest respect to the parties from whom it came, but to guard himself from being supposed to agree in its sentiments. He had also a petition from a literary gentleman, Mr. E. H. Baker, praying that when the House had the subject of the British Museum under consideration, care would be taken to supply a great defect at present existing—the want of a class catalogue in the institution. SABBATH OBSERVANCE. Mr. HU TT presented five petitions from different places, praying for a law to enforce the better observance of the Sabbath. LICENSED VICTUALLERS. Mr. ABEL SMYTH presented a pertition from cer tain victuallers praying for relief. Also a petition praying for the better observance of the Lords's day. MILITARY PUNISHMENTS. Mr. BARNARD presented a petition from Woolwich, praying for the abolition of corporal punishments in the army. Also petitions from the licensed victuallers of Deptford and Greenwich, praying for relief. MAYNOOTH COLLEGE. Mr. W. CAMPBELL presented a petition from a pa rish in Lanarkshire, against the grant to 141aynooth Col lege. Also, another petition, praying for the better ob servance of the Sabbath. CORONERS' INQUESTS. Mr. ROBINSON presented a petition from the medical practitioners of the town of Worcester, praying to be re munerated for their attendance at Coroners' Inquests. PROBATE DUTIES. Mr. ROBINSON gave notice of his intention to move that real and personal property be put on the same footing in respect to the Probate Duties. CHURCH RATES. _ . Mr. WILKS presented a petition from the dissenters of a parish i❑ Berks, praying for the abolition of Church Rates. IRISH 'MUNICIPAL BILL. Mr. E. 'I"ENNENT presented a petition from Bel fast against certain clauses of this Bill. ESCHEATS. Mr. TOOKE presented petitions from the Lords of Manors of Eiset and Sussex against the Bills respecting the boundary of Manors and Law of Escheat. Mr. VIVIAN presented ,a petition from the Medical Practitioners of Swansea, praying that compensation might be granted them for their attendance at Coroners' Inquests. Mr. SCA ItLETT presented petitions from the lords of manors of the county of Norfolk against the Law of Es cheat, and two other Bills now before that. House. TAXES ON KNOWLEDGE. Mr. JOHN MAXWELL presented petitions from several places in Lanarkshire, praying for a repeal of all the taxes on knowledge. HANDLOOM WEAVERS. The HON. ,MEMBER then presented petitions from 12,000 handloom weavers, praying that some measure of relief would be extended to them. The Hon. Member observed, that having given notice of a motion on the sub ject, he trusted his I\4jesty's Ministers would grant some measure of relief to this distressed class of operatives. AGRICULTURAL DISTRESS. The Marquis of CHANDOS gave notice that on the House going into a Committee of Supply on Friday, the 2.-2 d of April, he would call its attention to the distressed state in which the Agricultural Interest of the country was placed. Captain BARCLAY presented a petition from an indi vidual in Gloucestershire, .aganst the Gloucester Railway Bill. All the pritate business for the day having been disposed of, and there being no petitions to present, the business of the House was completely suspended from half-past four to five o'clock, at which hour Lord John Russell took his scat on the Treasury bench. TITHES COMMUTATION BILL. Lord J. RUSSELL said that in moving that the Order of the Day for going into Committee on the Tithes Com mutation Bill be discharged, he would take that opportu nity of stating, with respect to this Bill, he did not intend tl propose to go into Committee pro forma upon it this evening ; but he moved that it be committed, pro forma, on Wednesday next, and he would then state the general substance of the alterations he proposed to make when so committed. The further consideration of the Bill in Com mittee, he proposed to take on Thursday, the 21st instant. lie merely moved that it be committed pro forma, in order that it might be delivered as soon as possible in a printed form. ORDNANCE ESTIMATES. Lord JOHN RUSSELL moved the Order of the Day, for the house going into a Committee of Supply on the Ordnance Estimates. The House then went into Committee, Mr. R. STUART in the Chair. Sir A. LEITH HAY said, in bringing the Ordnance Estimates under the consideration of the Committee, it would not be necessary to preface them by any le n g thened observ a ti ons , an d h e would merely state that every expenditure had been carefully examined, and every circumstance con nected with them looked into with a due regard to the efficiency of the public service, and to economy in every department. The vote for the present year would be 52,6101. less than that of the last. This saving was occasioned by var i ous causes, wh i ch wou ld b e scan 1;y reference to the votes themselves, but from this there would be deducted a sum of 20,0001., by which it was found necessary to encrease the vote for the store de partment, so that the actual reduction would be 32,6101. The amount of the vote for stores last year was not so great as the sum proposed for this, which was .20,0001., but that was the aggregate of the whole, and in it was in cluded a sum of 5,0001. for arm, the sum required for arms which it was found necessary to increase, in consequence of the nzei - ssity of filling up the stores with a supply of arms mquired fit the public service, of a better description than those hitherto used. The sum, .therefore, of 70,0001. was by 5,000/. greater than the vote of last year, but in it was in cluded the vote he mentioned for the general supply of stores. The Commissariat estimates of last year were considerably higher, in consequence of the high price of forage. There would be this year a diminution of 19,6661. in that depart ment. In consequence of the removal of the stores in Tooley-street to the Tower, an increase bad taken place. The removal of the depot in Toolcy-street had cost 'the Government 8,705/. Of these premises the public held a lease for en unexpired term of years, which had been sold for 10,1501.,fullycovering all the expenses incurred by the removal of the depot, and leaving a residue of 1,4151. There would like rise be a saving of 3,300/. annual rent to the public, by reason of this change. There was another important feature in the present estimates, viz., the ordenance survey of Great Britain and Ireland. The amount of this item last year was 10,500/. The sum proposed for the present year was 13,000/., being an in crease of 2,500/. .This work, however, when completed, would be highly beneficent to the empire, and well worth the money which had been expended on it. The amount for the Irish survey was the same as last year, namely, 40.000/. The whole was under the superintendence of Caleby, whose name was a guarantee for the manner in which the work would be conducted. In the Barrack department there would be a saving of 22,940/., although upwards of 4,0001. had been expended for repairs on barracks in the West Indies in consequence of damages sustained through the late hurri cane. He should state to the House what would be sufficient to show that that branch of the public service was carried on with all possible attention to economy, whiteat the same time the accommodation of the troops was amply provided for, which would show that that establishment was on a very different footing from what it was before it came under the control of the Board of Ordnance. Previous to thet period the barrack expenditure far Great Britain amounted to 143,809/., being at the rate of Si. 1 ls. per man ; and in 1835 it only amounted to 64,118/., being - at the rate of 31.95. 4d. per man. In Ireland the branch expenditure in ' amounted to 134,838/. being at the rate of 4/.lls. per man, and;rt 1835 the expenditure was only 54,919/., being at the rate ot" 4 10s. 9d. When it was recollected that not less than 13L: ~? 726 men were to be provided for out of . "ild not be considered too much, this expenditure, it cam. mportance that it should be because it was of the greatesC A would , he believed, kept in a state of efficiency. The H0t,..-ng might rea admit that the sum now asked was as little nar sonably be supposed absolutely necessary f o r that, . ticular branch. He had stated briegy some of - the items of the Ordnance Estimates, and he had also stated that it was not necessary to trespass at aay great length ; but he would call the attention of the House to the particular circumstance, which was the absoluts necessity of keeping the Ordnance establishment up to an efficient and serviceable state. When the importance of that depart ment was considered, he trusted the House would on the present, as on former occasions, support that branch of the public service, and vote those supplies. It was of the greatest moment, particularly in the event of a .war, that this establishment should be on an efficient foot ing, so.as to meet the demands of the public service, and reflect credit on the country to which it belonged. He would conclude by movieg that a sum not exceeding 67,0961. be granted to his Majesty for defraying the expense of the Civil Department of the Ordnance Office—Granted ; as were also the following sums ;-8,181/. for the Civil Establishment of Woolwich ; 13,890/. for defraying the expse of the Home Stations ; 27,778/. for the stations in Ireland and abroad ; 33,968/. for the Barrack Department ; 4,447/. for the payment of the Master Gunners' Depart ment in the islands of Jersey, Guernsey, &c. ; 73,321/. for the payment of the Corps of Royal Engineers, Sappers and Miners, in Ireland and the Colonies ' • 274,496/. for the main tenance of the regiment of Royal Artillery ; 36,045/. for the Royal Horse Artillery ; 602/. for the Royal Train ; 10,129/. for the payment of the Medical Department. A sum of 29,240/. for defraying Ordnance Works ; 10,672/. for Storekeeper's Expenditure ; 29,2401. for Su neriatendants of Buildings and repair of Barracks; 53,526/. for Building and Repair of Barracks in Great Britain and Ireland ; 57,753/. for Defraying Barrack-Master's Expen ditures and Allow antes ; 131,113/. for Defraying the Mili tary, Civil, and Barrack Contingencies of Great Britain and the Colonies ; a suns of 75,000/. for the Supply of Small Arms and Stores. A sum of 20,000/. for the repairs of foreign works, and for works in progress under the sanction of Parliament. A sum of 5,418/. for services performed by the Office of Ordnance, not provided for by Parliament. A sum of 159,617/. for military and civil superannuation allowances. Sir A. L. HAY said that the last vote which he had to propose was for the purpose of buying bread, meat, forage, coals. candles, &c.—(A laugh.) Before he moved this vote, he hoped that the House would take into consideration that increased duties were imposed on the Office of Ordnance, and he hoped they would believe that however much it might be represented that that Office bad nothing to do, they certainly had very considerable duties to perform. He hoped that Honourable Members would disabuse their minds of any false imposition that there were three or four gentlemen in that office who had nothing to do . He proposed that 141,317/.le granted to defray the expenses of buying bread, &c.—Granted. NEW HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT. • Sir ROBERT PEEL wished to ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer a question connected with the ex hibition of the plans of the New Houses of Parliament, He had received several communications which led him to believe that great dissatisfaction prevailed on the part] of those wile were not the successful competitors on two groundsr One was that architects were specifically ex cluded from permission to see the plans that were successful. He had a letter from a — very eminent gentleman who went with a friend, and applied for permission tosee the 4 plans. His friend was admitted, but he, being an artist, was told that he was specially excluded by order of the Woods and Forests. There might be zood reason for this, but it seemed very ungracious to exclude all prefessional men. The other point was that the successful plans were not exhibited in common with the others. One plan, the successful one, there might be some reason for not exhibiting, but be saw no reason why the three others should not, be exhibited. He hoped that measures would be derived by which the three selected plans should be exhibited with the others according to the •original intention. That was the first point on which he wished for information ; and the second question he had to ask was why the architects were excluded from a view of the three successful designs. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER was not enabled to give any answer to one of the questions of tho Right Hon. Baronet ; but he hoped shortly to obtain such information as wouid be quite satisfactory. He believed that his Noble Friend did net feel justified in orderin that the 3 successful designs should be sent along with the others to the exhibition until the Committee had come to some final determination with respect to it ; for the determination in favour of Mr. Bairy's plan was as yet only provisional, and under these circumstances the Noble Lord, perhaps, felt that he had no right to allow the plans, Nos. 2,3, and 4, to pass out of his custody. He believed, however, that on Monday next the Committee would resume its sitting?, and lie hoped in one or two days they would be oble to con clude the preliminary part of the inquiry, and thus by Tues day or Wednesday next he trusted the two plans and Mr. Bairy's also would be added to the collection. As to the other question, he was not aware of the grounds for excluding persons of the agricultural profession from L. view of the successful designs. lie knew that great alarm was entertained by the artists themselves, lest any sketh or unauthorized publication of their designs should be given to the public ; and they felt that there was greater danger from persons of their profession than from ordinary iii viduals. Mr. HAWES intended to mention the circumstance noticed by the Right Hon, Baronet, and he wished to know why it was that not only the architects generally were excluded, but some of them by name. It was, he believed, in the power of the Committee to order the plans to be exhibited ; and he was per fectly sure if the Chancellor of the Exchequer intimated the wish of Government that they should be set before the public, that wish would be complied with. He also wished to know whether the engraved plan of Mr. Barry's design would be according to the original, or that which it was understood would be cut down to suit the estimate to be moved for. Mr. HUME could not understand why the plans should not all be exhibited together. It appeared to him that there was no just ground for the exclusion of the public from the favoured one, and far less was there any for the exclusion of the architects generally, or more par ticularly the unsuccessful ones. He hoped that even Mr. Barry's plan would be exhibited in its original state, and not as it was after it had been cut down in order to suit the estimates—the public and the unsuccessful archi tects had a right to that. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEHUER said the Committee had not yet da c id e d upo th n ey an c y ou o l f d the plans, and until they had he did not se e th a t them. If they did so they would defeat the very which the Committee had in view. Before the object partuboje with House was called upon to acquiesce in any plan, they should be publicly exhibited. Sir JOHN SINCLAIR could see no reason shy the whole of the p lans should not be exhibited. At all events, It was clear that j ustice would not be done if the original plan, as sent in by Mr. Barry, was not exhibited. Mr. HAWES hoped, at any rate, Members of that House might have the privilege of taking in one architect with him. A Noble Lord (a Member) had made the attempt, and found that the architect was excluded by name. No doubt there might be many more in the same way. THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY, APRIL 11, .136 , Sir R. PEEL said the matter wis made of import:ll%er nv_irely by the exclusion.-Cflear, hear.) Surely it might . be done away with now without fear.. The Hon. Baronet begged to ask the Noble Lord, as be cnderstood the Tithe CominutatiOn Bill was fixed for Wed nesday, whether it was his intention that the Hpuse should go into Committee pro fiwnza, or that the discussion should take place on that evening. Lord JOHN RUSSELL said, as be did not anticipate .my ohjeetion to the - coarse lie proposed to go into Com ,nittee pro forma, at the same time it was his ilAcntion to state upon that occasion the alterations he intended to propose. • Sir R. PEEL bcmgcd to know whether the Tithe Com mutation Bill watdsupersede the Mutiny Bill. • Lord JOHN RUSSELL replied in the negative. The Mutiny Bill should be the first business of the evening. Major HANCOURT gave notice that he would propose on the introduction of the Mutiny Bill, that flogging in tho .trmy ha abolished. MARINE INSURANCES. In reply to a question from Mr. RICHAItDSON, The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he would explain his views on the subject on the 29th inst. CHANCERY REFORM. Mr. PEMBERTON begged - to ask the Noble Lord, whether the measure for reforming the Court or Chancery was to be introduced in this or the other House of Parlia ment, and when it was to be brought fi►rward? lie un derstood that a vacancy had occurred in one of the Mas terships in Chancery. He (Mr. Pemberton,) trusted that the vacancy wculd not be filled up as some important changes was highly necessary in that department. Lord J. RUSSELL begged to state that the measure relating-to the Court of Chancery would be introduced in the other House of Parliament, and he believed his Noble Friend, the Lord Chancellor, would to-morrow give n etice of the time on which it would be introduced. The Hon. Member was quite right in suggesting that no appointment to the vacant Mastership should take place till the details of the measure were before the public, it was not the intention of his Majesty's Government to make any appointment at present. 1 BLOWING UP OF THE STATUE OF KING WILLIAM. Sir G. SINCLAIR begged to know whether the Noble Lord, the Chief Secretary for Ireland, had received any intimation relative to the blowing up of the statue of King William in Dublin ?—(Hear, and much laughter.) That statue had been long preserved as a me mento of the glorious, pious, and immortal memory of that Monarch ? Lord MORPETH begged to say that he had received no official details on the subject. 0 RDNANCE ESTIMATES. Mr. HUMS not having been present, by mistake, when the. Ordnance Estimates were passed—(Loud laughter)— said he should not lose the opportunity, when the Report was brought up, to take the sense of the House regard ing the expenditure in that department. It was in his opi nion absolutely necessary that some change should take place. The House would recollect that a Commission had been ap pointed to inquire into the different establishments of the Ord nance, in order to effect what military men considered most important—the amalgamation of the Ordnance and engineers with the Commander-in-Chief's Department, and converting the other into a simple Store Department, by which three hundred thousand pounds a-year would be saved to the public at large. It was his intention to have shown the extravagance of the system as it now ex isted, and he hoped he would be able to show that it was money altogether thrown away—a complete waste of the public money. He wished to know from a Noble Lord (Howick) whether that inquiry ' was still going on, and whether the House was likely to have any Report on it this Session ? Lord HO WICK would answer the latter part of the Hon. Member's inquiry first. That inquiry was still in progress. When the Commission of which he (Lord Howell) had still the honour to be a Member, was first appointed, it had proceeded to .ascertain what had been previously done, and they had referred to the Commission which had been previously appointed, of which the Duke of Richmond was the head.--?(Cries of " Hear, hear.") The Hon. Member must be aware that during the sitting of Parliament great difficulties existed in proeeed ing with inquiries of this description.---(Hear, hear, hear.) It was, however, the intention of his Majesty's Government to proceed with this enquiry as soon as possible, and he trusted that before the conclusion of the session he should be enabled to lay the report before the House. With reference to the other point to which the Hon. Member objected. As to the Ordinance Department, he would not make any obser vation, only regretting that the Hon. Member for Middle sex bad not attended the House a little earlier.—(Grew laughter. LIGHTHOUSE BILL. Mr. HUME wished to know from the Right lion. the President of the Board of Trade, when it was intended to bring in the Lighthouse Bill. Mr. P. THOMPSON said, in the course of a very few days. ARMY ESTIMATES. Lord HO WICK then rose to move the Army Esti mates. The Noble Lord moved that a sum of 57,4751.85. 6d. should be granted to his Majesty, for the purpose of de fraying the charges and allowances of a Department we could not catch. Mr. HUME objected to the vote. On a sum of 32,764/. 15s. Bd. being proposed for the support of the Royal Military Asylum and Military School, Mr. HUME wished to know whether they continued to receive children still ? Lord HOWICK was understood to reply in the affir mative. Mr. HUME thought it would be much better if this establishment were broken up. It had the effect of taking individuals away from their natural protectors, as many of the children were not orphans, and even if they were, in many instances their relations would be happy to take and keep them. He contended that the expense of keeping up of this establishment was quite disproportioned to the amount, of good alone ; and he confidently hoped that the recommendation of the Noble Lord's predecessor would be acted upon, viz., allowing the establishment gra dually to fall off. If the children could be sent into the country towns and boarded, it- could be done at one one half the expense, and they would moreover get rid of the costs of the building, which could be turned to sonic other public purposes. He hoped Government would re consider tne propriety of getting rid of this establishment. The vote was then agreed to. Lord HO WICK then moved that a sum not exceed ing 106,2111. 6s. Bd., be granted for the support of the volunteer corps. Mr. _HUME would beg to ask the Government if they intended to keep — up the volunteer corps in this country? In the last Session he had presented two or three petitions from Fife, complaining that the yeomanry volunteer corps there was kept up for party purposes, and to insult the working population. He had divided the House for three years upon the' ques tion, and would do so again in order to see how the ques tion stood. Lord HO WICK (lid not believe that the volunteer corps were used for party purpose—it was the cheapest force, and most useful. Last session a considerable reduc tion took place in the Militia staff; and he thought it good policy to support such a force. The House then divided. Ayes Noes Majority in favour of the vote, .... —44 A sum of 106,000/., for defraying the charges of general officers not being Colonels of regiments, from the Ist of April, 1836, to the Ist of April, 1837, was then agreed to. (LEFT SITTING.) SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS Mr. O'Connell has made the most of the relief from Parliamentary duty afforded by the Easter recess. He has already visited Nottingham, Hull, and York, and in our columns of this day will be found reports of the proceedings at the dinners given to him at the two last places. The proceedings at Nottingham ap peared on a former day. So eloquent an advocate as Mr. O'Connell, in a cause, too, which he has so deeply at heart, cou i l .e l u h p a le rd u l); . f E ai n l g t l o au m l ake rf a he 7 a w r e e rf t u ru l l i y7:heas; them, lovers of justice ; and they will i s l i e on rep o r n es t e h n e ts insist on fair play being allowed to Ireland. It is well observed in the third Report :of the Irish Law Commissioners that— " For nearly the whole of the last century the people of Ireland were governed by a code, the policy of which was to keep them in poverty and ignorance, and which was per fect for its purpose, It w as, to use the wo rds of 11Ir. Burke, a machine of wise and elaborate contrivance ; an d as well fitted for the oppression, impoverishment, and de gradation of a people, and the debasement in them of hu man nature itself, as ever proceeded from the perverted in genuity of man.' " heavily No Englishman possess ed of sound f eelings can have any other wish than t hat an atone m ent sh ould be made for the evils inflicted on his Irish brethren. B u t Mr. O'Connell aims at the heads as well as the hearts th of his audiences. He shows that a England is hav taxed for the sake of Ireland —t large army be kept in that country, and in addition seven thousand armed police—that while its population is half that of Britain, it pays less than five millions of taxes, while the inhabitants are so poor, that an imposition of ad ditional taxes would diminish the amount of the reve- But this is not the only vicw•which he took of the subject. He shovied, that were Ireland to attain to an equality with England, a large part of the taxation now raised in Briiain• would be paid by the sister kingdom, which would allow many taxes to be repealed. The cause of Ireland is in every respect the cause of England, and Englishmen cannot be too often told, that in redressing the • wrongs of Irishmen they are greatly ben ;fitting themselves. The enemies of the inhabitants of both countries were long but too successful in perplexing the question ; but we believe we may now confidently say that it is thoroughly understood. At the Hull dinner the speech made by Mr. Hutt was excellent. His comparison of the fifteen years which preceded the Reform Bill with the period which has elapsed since the passing of that measure, may, be recommended to the Tories, who begin to have very short memories for all that happened during .the former period. " At length (says. Mr. Hutt) we reached the year 1830, and who is there that witnessed the fearful signs of that pe riod who will not carry with him through life a most in structive remembrance of them? The landowners were alarmed for the diminished security of property ; moneyed men looked with dismay at the portentous depression of the funds ; in the great manufacturing towns of the north vast masses of men were combining to overthrow the Government by physical force ; in the south the peasantry were in insurrection against the Government ; the most fruitful provinces were lighted up by fires caused by des perate incendiaries ; the King—the most popular monarch that has sat upon the throne of England since the Revolu tion—the King dared not to go in company with his Mini sters to hold a festival in the metropolis of his empire. It was then that the Duke of Wellington and his party fled in dismay from office." The Reform Bill was the commencement of a new era in every sense. The country has ever since been in the enjoyment of unexampled prosperity. And even in Ireland prosperity begins to strike root. Equal jus tice, and such measures for the protection of the poor as are called for by the unfortunate circumstances in which they are placed, will soon work wonders in Ire land; and under the present Ministry they may calcu late on these blessings. The abuse of Mr. O'Connell only adds to his power. The people of Ireland would begin to suspect him, were he to be praised by the Times and other Tory Journals. Should the thieves praise the police, it would be high time for honest citi zens to look to their bars and bolts. The Irish know that Mr. O'Connell is abused precisely because he has overwhelmed their enemies• Mr. O'Connell is certainly the best abused man in the country ; but it is for his in terest that he should continue to be the best abused man in the country. But what has been the effect of the attempts to excite a hostile feeling against the Ca tholics and Mr. O'Connell in England ? The meet _ _ ings at Nottingham, Hull, and York, afford the best answer. The 'ultra Tories will surely soon perceive —from these manifestations—the policy of aban doning all attempts to raise the No Popery cry. If they do not, they will be taught by experience that the only fruit of their senseless cant is an increase of the popularity of Mr. O'Connell, and the advance ment of his influence in England as well as in Ireland. The Times and the Standard may employ fierce epithets, and call Mr. O'Connell hard names ; the whole Tory Press may wage war against him in their own way, and all classes of Tories may embark their remaining energies in the work of detraction ; but all will fail, whilst Mr. O'Connell can, with truth employ his. eloquence on the wrongs of his country, and de mand for her that justice which has been so long with held. All the real friends of the English Constitu tion, and especially of the Protestant Church, must be most anxious to have the wrongs of Ireland re dressed, to see its population engaged in profitable in dustry, and a termination put to conflicts arising out of sectarian differences—places of honour and confi dence filled by those persons who can best command favour and respect, and without reference to religious creed, to the exclusion of all who would cherish obso lete prejudices to cover corrupt and dishonest purposes. This is the proper way to counteract agitation, and the only practicable way of diminishing the influence of Mr. O'Connell, who frankly admits that he possesses too much. When Ireland no longer requires the aid of Mr. O'Connell, he will descend to the level of other subjects.—Morning Chronicle. 'We refer to the letter of our Dublin correspondent, and to an article we have extracted from the Evening Mail of Friday, for the particulars of an outrage per petrated in the Irish capital by some of the friends and supporters of Mr. O'Connell, some of the most active and zealous of the party who are loud and incessant in their cry for justice to Ireland. The justice which will satisfy the party is thus indicated with sufficient plainness. It is the opportunity and the liberty to overthrow every British institution which bears the seal or is associated with the history of that wise, and just, and gallant Prince whose statue they have conspired to lay prostrate in the dust. Will the people of Great Britaiu consent that the insolent _ savages who have perpetrated, or who applaud, this out rage upon . every political feeling and principle that Englishmen cherish, shall be placed in undivided and uncontrolled possession of all municipal and all political power ? To imagine this for a moment would be to off€.r the deepest affront to the calm good sense and manly spirit of our countrymen. We do not wish to anticipate the result of the investigation which has been instituted by the police and municipal authorities of Dublin into the cir cumstali'ces of this flagrant outrage upon the British . Government and nation, as well as upon the Protestant portion of the Irish people. This much, however, ap pears certain, anterior to any inquiry; that the offence must have required the active and persevering co operation of a considerable number of persons, and that its completion has been hailed by the exulting ap plause of the whole of those classes of the people of Dublin whom the Roman Catholic Priests inspire, and in whose name and by whose authority Mr. O'Connell declaims. The act is indeed as clearly identified with the Priest and O'Connell faction as if it were traced by evidence the most conclusive to its prominent leaders.—Morning Post. The Radicals of Hull treated Mr. O'Connell to a dinner last week, and Mr. O'Connell treated them in return to a repetition (the hundredth, we believe) of his stock travelling speech about justice to Ireland. There is nothing very remarkable in the affair, as reported in the Radical papers, unless it be the Anvitation with which the demagogue concluded his harangue, urging his auditors to pro mote the cause of " justice to Ireland," by menacing and insultin ,, the House of Lords. The Radicals of Hull, who live cast light and dignity upon the House of Commons by- the introduction to that Assembly of two such distinguished philosophers and statesmen as Mr. Hutt and Colonel Peyronnet Thompson, are, it seems, to tell the British Peerage " in a tone re spectful but firm, that they shall do justice to Ireland, or else —." It is a pity that this Radical carousal was not held a few days later, for in this case the sen tence need not have been left unfinished, but would aptly and seasonably have concluded, " or else their Lordships shall speedily undergo the fate which my friends in Dublin, the Irish friends of justice, have just inflicted upon the statue of King William, of glo rious memory." —Morning Post. Parliamentary business is to be resumed this even ing in the House of Commons —we trust with some thing more of sfect than can justly be attributed to the labours of the early part of the Session. It is in vain, however, to hope that the mass of business now before the House in one shape or another can be sa tisfactorily gone through, or eyen briefly examined, i n the remaining months that Parliament will sit. If the Ministers were vigorous and decisive statesmen, which they certainly are not, and if the House of Commons were of the most dignified and business-like habits, which certainly it is not, there would still be great difficulty in•adjusting so many doubtful and weighty questions as are now entered upon the p a p ers o f t h e House for discussion. As it is, we must look for ward to much talk and little work, until the dog-day heats and impatience for a prorogation shall cause some measures to be hurried through, without due examination, and others to be postponed to a more which probably may never com e. con venient season, Before proceeding to offer a few observation s upon the general aspect of the business to which the House of Commons will have to apply itself, a word or two m ay be afforded respecting the cope measure of great publicinterest which has been go; khroutll, and is now to he - discussed in the House of Lord 3. We trust their Lordships will do their duty with respect to the Irish Corporations Bill, without fear of the machinations of any demagogue, or farour to the in terests of any party. No man who is not a . Revo t lutionist at h ear t can b e h o ld, w ithout indignation, the • attempts which are made to wrest by violence from the Constitution the advantages of a free decision by the , 7) Upper Hous e o f Parliament, upon the measures agreed to by the Lower. There are certain demagogues alien to British feeling, and hostile to British principles in religion, and in constitutional Government, who seem to think it becoming, under the new order of things, to parody the public maxims, of which heretofore Englishmen have been proud. Instead of carrying justice to every man's door, they would carry agita tion ; and they would appeal to the Legislature, not by argument, but. by threatS. We confess we have no taste for such highwayman practice in politics. We see no reason that desperate men, without any thing to lose—not even character, should be suf fered to bully'a branch of the British Legislature into compliance with their views. If we have a Legisla ture which is incapable of acting rightly, the first bu siness to be attended to is to change it ; but while we have Legislative authorities which we acknowledge, let us treat thetn`with respect. Let us not reverse the natural order of thing's, and attempt to rule those whom we allow to remain' in the situation of rulers. To do so is at once paltry and flagitious. We show that we have not the courage to get rid of a consti tuted authority, nor the fortitude to bear with its re solves. We allow the form of a power, but seek by underhand threats to make it nugatory. Such con duct may be suitable to those who act under the direction of Irish priests, but it is altogether unworthy of Englishmen ; and we hope to see it treated with calm indifference by the Peers, and vlith calm contempt by the country. The list of matters, (independently of petitions and inciden tal business) already provided for the occupation of the House of Commons, occupies no less than fifteen folio pages, closely printed, and comprises an immense extent and variety of subjects, from the re gulation of oyster beds, under the auspices of Mr. Baring, to the regulation of the House of Peers, under the auspices of Mr: Cuthbert Rippon. The latter modest gentleman has two distinct propositions on the notice-book for different days ; one for declar ing cathedral establishments to be " useless," the other for relieving Archbishops 'and Bishops, from their du ties as' members of the Legislature. These are spe cimens of the way in which the notice-book gets filled up. Surely some other place might be found for re cording the insults and sneers which gentlemen of Mr. Rippon's calibre and quality are pleased to fling out against the Church Establishment. It is neither useful nor becoming that the impertinence of faction should be mixed up with the serious business of the nation. The principal matters which probably will come under dis cussion by the House, are the Commutation of Tithes in England—the Irish Church question, upon Lord Morpeth's notice for the 25th, April—the State of the Agricultural Interest—the State of the Irish Poor, with reference to the Bills of Sir R. Musgrave and Mr. Poulett Scrope, and to the Third Report of the Irish Poor Inquiry Commissioners—the Consolidation of the Stamp Laws, and the Reduction of the Stamp Duty on Newspapers—Foreign Policy, with reference to the designs of Russia Military Punishments, the Factory Act Alteration Bill, and, perhaps, the Bill for abolishing or amending the law regarding Imprison ment for debt. We have not in the foregoing in cluded what are called the Dissenters' Bills, relating to marriages and registrations, which have no precise time fixed for their discussion, and may probably (not withstanding the Ministerial flourishes regarding them at the commencement of the Session) not to be brought on at all. There is, indeed, quite enough without them, and more than can possibly be care fully sifted in the House of Commons. The Bill for the Commutation of Tithes in England is the first in order,. and stands upon the book for this evening. Notices have been given of no less than eleven amendments to be proposed by different Mem. hers. This measure is most ingeniously contrived for the suggestion of objections. We have already shown those which landlords reasonably bring forward against it, which may be comprised in this, that it fixes a per manent charge, not in proportion to the average and natural value of the land to an owner or occupier, but according to the actual cultivation, or neglect, for the last seven years. The titheowners, on the other hand, exclaim against the principle of the Bill. The clergy, generally, admit that the Bill would give them as good, or perhaps a better, income than they have ; but they object that the law shauld take from them that 30 or 40 per cent. which they now voluntarily forego ; an d whatever they may think as to their own inttmsts, they do not feel that for their successors, 11 modern rent charge, imposed by a modern Aot of Parliament, is so good title as the claim to tithe, of which the memory of man runneth not to the contrary. There were symptoms, when the subject was last before the H ouse , of Lord John Russell being staggered by the public feeling of the unreasonableness of the Bill, and we should not be surprised if it never reaclieti the House of Lords. Should any " untoward event" arrest its progress, Sir Robert Peel will, we take it for granted, proceed with his Bill for eourimutation on the voluntary principle, or make it a present to his Majesty's Minis ters to console them for the failure of their own sure. With respect to the Irish Church question, the great point of anxious expectation 4, of course, cen tred in the "appropriation) clause." Should this be omitted or No modified as to take from it the offensive character of a spoliation of the Church for the fur therance of secular objects, it will at once make a great and salutary change in the arrangement of Parliamen tary influence and political parties. It would unite the strength of the Conservative party with the Gown ment, and throw the extreme radicals and the Irish Papist party into the position and character, which are naturally and properly theirs under a Protestant monarchy. We fear, however, that the disgraceful O'Connell alliance is likely to be preferred to this really patriotic policy, and party resentments will still he indulged to the detriment of the country's best in terests.—Morning Herald. PRIVILEGES OF THE PEERs.—the Lords have various powers and privileges peculiar to themselves. They are the sole judges in the arraignment of any Peer of the realm—in the impeachment of any Minister of the Crown— of Writs of Error relative to illegal proceedings in the Courts of Law—and in Appeals from the Courts of Chancery. In all matters of importance, such as those which pertain to the corruption of Judges or Magistrates, or other persons filling judicial or civil situations of responsibility, they can, wheneler the please, put persons on their oaths. All bill s i n any way affecting the rights of the Peers must originate in their own House, and cannot be altered in the slightest degree by the House of Commons. Every Peer has a right to enter his protest on the journals of the House against any measure of which he disapproves, and to state the reasons on which he grounds his dissent at any length be pleases. When sitting in judgment, the Peers do not give their decisions on oath as do the Members of the House of Commons, but simply on their honour. They are regarded by the Constitution as the hereditary counsellors of the King, and may, at any time, de n.and admittance to his presence to give him their advice on any question they consider important. Their persons are for ever sacred in' the eye of the law ; they cannot be imprisoned or arrested for debt, nor can they be outlawed in any civil ac tion. Any person circulating scandalous reports respecting a Peer, no matter whether true or false, subjects himself to fine and imprisonment. Their houses cannot be entered under any circumstances, by the officers of justice, without a warrant under the King's own hand, and under the hands of six Privy Councillors, four of whom must be Peers of the Realm. They have the right of qualifying a certain number of chaplains to perform divine service. The number, howevei t , varies with the rank of the Peers. A Duke can qualify six ; a Marquis or Earl, five ; a Viscount, four ; and a Baron three. These are the leading powers and privileges of the Peers. They have various others of minor importance. —Random Re collections of the House of Lords. Mr. T. Rhodes, of Greasbro', whose remarkable flock of sheep only consists of 21 ewes, 18 of whom alone have lambed, have produced the extraordinary number of 42 healthy lambs. Six of the ewes have yielded three lambs each, and one as many as four. --Doncaster Gazette. There has been no little 'chit-chat for this fortnight last past, in the eastern part of Cornwall, r especting a certain Rev. DiVine'i foPlillan 4 net twenty miles from Launceston, and a lady, a near relative of the divine, who resides not twenty miles from Honiton. The lady has been sent to her mamma, near Honiton.— Western Times. THE MARY FRANCES. --TWO of the mariners be longing to the late crew of the above unfortunate vessel, by name John Horner and William Robinson, have recently ar rived at this port. They were brought to Stromness by the Lady Jane. They seem to hare suffered very considerably in their health, by the priyations And hardships to which they hEtvqbee . suete a IluilPacm bp THE MARKETS. t,OUNTRY CORN MARKETS DURING LAST' / C• Wheat. I Barley. Oats. Beani. to g. iser Quarter. s. to s. a. to s. s. to s. C4rlisle 4B 27 t:tl 31 44 ;25 25 16 22 M irneth 4t) 45 21 23 18 2 . 1 Pooritlt 51 1 27 24 s. s. 36 i ; 34 ,5 33 -.--; -3; - 52 , 3 . 5 24 Winchester 39 52 • 211 31 •20 l'er s.d. 5..1.,5. . a. d. t:marthen-- 4 8 5 0 2 7 3 0 1 4 2 U t:owbridge—„..... O. 0 6 o 3 4 0 11: 2 •iewrastle(Stati.) 6 0 fi 9 3 6 4030 • 3 4 Nortliallertork.—.... 6 0 7:1 3 6 46':3 3 4 0 8(1 s 6 4 0 4 8 3 u :3 4 50 59 30 341 2 0 24 Alarwick .. 8U 90 3U 461 •.! 0 3 3 Per 14011. daroardeastle * 11 0 14 0 0 0 86, 6 0 8 10 0 12 0 7 0 8:3 4 9 .5 11 ri 13 0 8(1 8 6 5I) 7 4 Stockton ---. 11 6 1J 3 8 6 11 01 4 8 5 712 44 6.(1. g. 00 d. 0 50 (► 0 50 53 5 6 6 tl 6 0 6 0 0 5G 6 s ,d 00 0I 00 0 0 0i 0 0 A " 00 0 ' 0 0 4 ! 0 0" 8 fi 10e 73 86 1 90 , 96 1 80 ti( 70 g 0 s 4 1,, 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 .April a. to —s. tine 49,. to —85., finene 4th.46: . to — 5 . fin e 4 ' s ' . to to —5. fin e to — 5 on e to 31s. tine 33 5 . to 9. - 4 tine 315. tine 318. WAKEFIELD CORN ALLIIKET.— Wheat, RAM, NortWs. and Suitnik —d.:36. --- Liu. and Cain. ---.--.. ---- Yorkshire —s. 333. V:hite Foreign, tied —3. — B . -- .Vhite —s. —3. Barley, Ns.rfolis and tittablk ... . Os. Lincolnshire Yorkshire liVoltt -- Foreign Beans, Old. 375 -- New to :344 to —s. to 435. to :354. tine —s, tine line —s fine Vs. Oats, l'atato Poland—, —s. to I:2A. . --s. —s. to '2 s. fine ...6±. --- -- Friezland and Small --- Mealing , helling — 9.1. to ;Oil pe r Stone. `26s. to CS , OA. pe t 1.00 'l4lt —s :l. itapesetal is :16/. Os. ---I. Os. per Last. .RKETS SCOTCH MARKETS. Wheat. Barley. oats. B ea ns. °Annus/. , . .............. IV .............. _ Aberdeen 36 to 40 21 to 25 17 to 21 —to 23 to .T.,1 Berwick ' 34 20 24 13 17 20 24 33 : A) Coldstream - .... Cupar (I•ife - ..... Dundee 4B 58 30 33 '2O 25 30 31 --• ..., Elgin InvernOs 4O 44 30 :15 21 26 :12 33 —. "' Kelso ...... ..... Kirkaldy - Perth - k:., , - The siz, of the measure varies throughout the country. 20 22 122 25 1 !s throughout the country DINBURG small suppl: 11 CORN ly:of all kin, We hadla very rather quick. dARKET. ; of Grain;; —April 6. o.day, and tb le sales Wei* ' Wheat. Barley. Oat: 515.43 a. Od. 29s 4d 48 0 :'6 0 24 u 40 0 90 0 20 0 !rage price of Wheat PRICES OF PROVISIONS, &( Beef, per lb. ........ Os. sd. to Os. 7(1. Fresh Butter, Mutt0n...........-- 0 6 0 8 Salt Ditto _ Vea1.,......,.......... 0 7 010 Ditto, per cat..... 90 Pork ...... 9 6 0 7 Eggs, per d0z..... 0 Lamb, per qr. —8 0 10 0 OatStraiv(kp:.).... 7 Tallow, cwt......-36 0 38 0 Wheat Ditto...—., 7 Quarter!' Loaf -- U6} 0 7 Barley Ditto ....... 6 Potatoes, I ilk .... 0 5 0 0 Hay, per 5t............ 1 First Second .. Ave, Pease. 38s. 01. 31 0 22 0 2/. Is. 31. 13,3 114 ett 34 0 31 to Is 0 3 . 0 9 010 O 0 O 011 O S 6 6 9 0 6 7 to 0 I 2 EDINBURC4II MEA There was a middling supply of Oi sales were rather brisk. L MARKET.—ApriI 5. latmeal at this day's mariv,t, Ana the Per Sack of 2801 b. Imp. .First Oatmeal Second ditto _ Barleymezi 1 9 0 Peasemeal I 6 0 Pot Barley—No. I.per cwt. 103.--2,1 Per Stone 01 P . a.) ImP. A First Oatmeal ,go Second ditto ''' 0 Barleymeal 0 I " 6 Peasemeal , 0 1 126"--43"/ • 14&-4th, .MARKET. —ApriI 6. Train i little alteration in prices. 41. Oats, per '2641u. s. d. t* 0 Irish l6 0 0 '0 British l7 6 2° iSe h ans, per 260 1 b. 0 Englis ,„, 0 Scottish Pease 0 18 , Scottish ...... 15 . 8 0 Oatmeal, per 1401 b.... 15 0 ~.. 0 Flour, per 2601 b 33 0 Ju GLASGOW CORN A moderate business doing in Wheat, per 2401 h. s. d. s. d. British, old 230t0250 - new 1:00 230 Canada, free 24 0 !an 0 Irish Barley, per 3201 b. —7 - English 93 0 20 0 Scottish 24 6 1 6 Irish LIVERPOOL COTTON-MARKET, APRO The demand , this week has been moderatt, and consequ e- 0 ,. prices are less steady ; this will apply to al/ descriptions, but I n e v, particularly American, which are sellinv at 1 4d. under last week it a quotations, and the market does net aiipear so healthy as Speculators have taken 2,200 Alderican 1 000 Surat, 50 Peru l a. and 700 Bahia; and eiporttrs, 450 Am ' ei:lcan, and 700 B eng t ho The imports this week are 22,442 bags, namely 17,141 from _ d United States, 2,018 from the Brazils, 1,163 from Carthagena, a n ow 2,120 from Bombay. The sales comprise -120 Sea Islands d. d. 23 to 30 20 Stained ditto 9i-16 2,840 Uplands lo} —l2 2,850 Alabaman B4 —124 7,450 Orleans B*- 2,160 Surats . 1,060 Bahias Paras ...... 0— 0 240 Carthagenas 84 9 930 Bengals Total, 20, We have had a quiet Cotton nu ing 1,500 bales at yesterday's pm 10d. to 111hd. d. i• 800 Maranhams 111 to 1 1. 840 Pernams, Scs 13 Madras 0 170 West India lo 10 - - Barbadoes 10 Demerara., 14i 170 Egyptians 144 -- 171 Peruvians „„ ~, 0 610 Laguayras . . Smyrnas 0 - ,430 bales. arket to-day, the sales not exceo l ' rites, principally American, °Di Bales. Taken on speculation this year. 88,700 Same in 1835 ... 48,900 Bales Decrease of import this year compared with the same date last year 35,679 Decrease of stock .... ....... 23,3 00 Increase of quantity taken for consumption 27,100 Increase of quantity taken for export Comparative View of the Imports and Exports of Cotton into sr,l from the whol e Ki ng d om , f rom t h e Ist of January to the , inst., and of th e I m p or t s and R.:ports for the same period l ss year : 133k' 1 59, 8 1 4 a •: 3 7 , ,00u • 4,3 17 ▪ 290,0 Into the Kingdom this year. America - South American West Indies, Demerara, &c. East Indies Egypt, &c. Total of all descriptions . Same period last year. Bags. American 236,004 South American . . West Indies, Demerara, &c. East Indies , 16,132 co 42 8 Egypt, &c. - --' ______...— Decrease of Imports as compared with same 56 5 period last year Exports in 1836. American, 4,109 ; Brazil, 1,049 ; East India, 15, 830 West India, 5 ; Other kinds, 20. . 21,0 13 Total in 1836 .......... 15,270 Same period last year Stock. _ _ 16 6 ,i" 30 148,190 March 31, 1835 . Same time, 1836 . CORNWALL MARKETS. Calculated at •24 gallons to the bushel.) Wheat. Barley. I. to I" 0 ti. d. to 4. d. s. d. to s. d. '• (~ 1 0 A Truro He!stone — 0 19 0— 0 9 2 ° S 0 19 0— 0 9,; 0 S T 6 St. Austell... • Bodmin 0 19 6 0 9 6 0 • 0 Liskeard 0 17 0 0 9 6 , 0 0 Launceston 0 19 6 0 9 0 -- " 9 A Camel ford lO 0 19 0— 0 10 0 7 ,, 9 " Penzance :::9 0 21 0 0 11 0 - Cwt. Vri MINING INTELLIGENCE. 'fons• ~, 0 Quantity or C,,ppet Ore sold 3,513 -5 0 Quantity of tin e C o p per 2.... Average Produce • S% 0 ,1, Amount of Sale, 20.0.:01.25.64.1.—Average Standard 10 ' l'. - MEETINGS OF CREDITORS TO-M 0 1" 11. Budd, tobacconist, Skinner-street g J. Cochrane, bookseller, Waterloo-place ............... . ........ ... J. A. Jameson, rope-maker, Bermondsey-wall .............. ........... g J. Golds, unity. coal-merchaut. Great St." Helen's ...... ...... . g E. Wilso», cheesemonger, Lowther-street ....... ........ 1 H. Good, wine merchant, Bear.lane ................................ W. Smith, merchant, Circus, Minories ...................... .. ... 'l'. Luck, stealer in lace, Lad-lane SILVER CANDLEST I ' m wr a o y rk l in e Six Guineas a pair. A variety of patterns of elegant Silver Candlesticks JO in cl b e iN g 'S li : g sel G ec o t l e d c s l in fr it o h m ; a s t a t v h e e rs a m b i qe , p an rice, d a a t h . m c a o k exr SAS : 1 000 01 ' Pla t London. P l '. A pamphlet, giving a d e t a il e d li s t o f th e prices of Plate, Goods, Watches, Clock s , & c . may b e h a d tis • gra On the 7th inst., in M ar i ne - terrace , BIRTHS. lady Of j. maize° , the Waddington, Esq., of a son. , fa' On the Bth inst., at Cross Deep, Twickenham , the 'say 0 Of Barnard, Esq., of a son. Ih e ed/ On the Gth inst., at St. Andrew's-square, Greenock, t Aloe' f ' be- A. Campbell, Esq., of Tobago, of a daughter. On the 6th inst., at Woo lc Norfolk, the lady ° marle Cater, Esq., of a son. __.-------- --- MARRIED. A Cour' r ~ is, On the sth inst. , at Edinburgh, Antoine Baron de Stro e auFA m ) sr. cillor of Court, and Secretary to the Imperial Legat i°ll e aate. at Frankfort, to Saintclair Stuart, eldest daughter of th I Trotter, Esq., of Ballindean. ban , Egl'' .., On the 6th inst., at St. James's Chapel, James Str Joh n h, m o wbra. , of Manila, to Mary Catherine, s econ d d aug ht e r of J° ll h, Esq., of liartwood, Esq., W.S. ~,,n;O 9 Stni On the 9th inst., at St. Martin-in-the-Fields, IN T . ' he late 13 ' i 1 , 9 E t o h:i g t n o . s n t : , t o a t SarahSt George's, r n g n e: s, eldestH an ov d e a r u ; h 4 Esq., of John-street, Adelphi, to Clara., only child of t Esq. S h o e p ., h to e hf r e d ter uare t ; f l e r r r . Y 7. il l°r ei : nolds, of Dover. 0 'Thom On the 9th inst., at St. Nicholas Cole Abbey, L0nd0.,,,_ Mall Farry, eldest son of the late Mr. T. Morris, of Bristelorogate Anne, youngest daughter of the late Mr. C. M athews ' High-street. ___.------------.' Rock Villa in the I l I‘,. Crone, E sq ., A 7th inst D . lED. -- o f J ames r, ' ese of Man, Jcminia , r u . n g e of 'P— e" r At and Forests. e a (19' On the • John M • •, a arsh s, in Stan done, Martin Leake, Es of Thorp Hall, Essex• jam, ie. On the 9th instat ' Hill, Surrey, aged 8 6, ~_. 0 • • •, Richmond net f William Burn, Esq ,of Lisbon. t m gen a t u for thset Co:onmeisiismenrte: a , . On the 7th inst Mar . -le of Ca tain Cubitt, of le Close, Norwich. " y, the '4l P ter ton , Es4'' On the I s t i ns t., a t Braco Castle, Perth , J ames Mas .i of Braco. i 0 On the 6th inst., at Ventnor, Isle of Wight, age(‘`velbb,-ri cl'' hie Margaret, e ld es t surviving (laughter of the late T. INI• J oe. of Meretield Lodge, Essex. (I Trower, Esq,, ono of the Mas , brs in the High On the Bth inst., et Thorn Croft, near Lc?,,Viretr:feua-,,,:an0e11• London I) • f • rin al and Publioslisied b grand, at The Sun ee 4 No. 3 of Middlesex. yM VlD°StrYanrinNtY4l-; Cola