The Sun. — London, England, 1836-08-25 00:00:00

those who have witnessed his able exertions during election came. Who does not remember the exulting the present Session will know to be almost inva- shouts of triumph sent forth by the Ministerial Papers riable with him. He did not repeat his former argu- on account of the changes wrought in the local govern anents, for they were fresh in the recollection of went of those places by the Municipal Reform Bill. the public, and he contented himself w ith o ffering While that Bill was under discussion in Parliament, one Tee.son which of itself seemed conc lusive to his the Ministers and their adherents described it as a Bill iv - nt., and which will, we feel assured, be satisfactory intended merely to procure a 'toter and more respon rto every rational person in the country. The Lords sible government for the boroughs than they could had passed a Bill with amen d men ts, t o some of possess under a system of self-election. No sooner, which the Commons disagreed, and the Lords had in- however, had the first elections under the Bill taken sisted upon those amendments, as n e c e ss a r y in their place, than the Ministerial Journals, with shameless view to the measure. A f ree con f erence was held, and effrontery, avowed that the great value of the Bill the result was the rejection by the Commons of the Bill. consisted in its capability of being worked so as to Four Bills were then concocted, which contained nearly control Parliamentary elections, and, in fact, to place all the clauses to which the two Houses had agreed, the reformed representation at the will and disposal of but omitted those upon which the Lords had in- the Ministers of the Crown. If such were the case, istcd, as necessary to the entire measure. If the Lords we argued that Corporations ought to be abated alto had agreed to all these Bills, they would have been, gether as a national nuisance. One of the most se as Lord Lyndhurst, we recollect rightly, said, the rious charges made against the old boroughs was, that laughing-stock of the country, permitting themselves to they made a property of the representative system. The be entrapped by some crafty lawyer into a surrender of Whig-Radicals exulted too soon in supposing that the those provisions on which they had so properly insisted Municipal Reform Bill had transferred the power of at the free conference. Mark, then, what they did. returning Members of Parliament to their own party. They passed a Bill for the protection of the borough They evinced their love of corruption and undue influ fund ; another to remedy a defect in the Government ence when exercised in their own favour ; but, for mer...sure of last session respecting the boundaries of tunately, the Bill is not so capable of counteracting the boroughs ; and a third " for the better administration principle of free election as Ministers intended it to be. of justice in boroughs." They did not, however, pass In many of the old Corporations the elective franchise the ex post facto clauses before referred to, and even was in a few corporators, and in them alone, ever since Lord Holland himself must, we think, on reflection, see the reign of Charles 11. That was a usurpation and notwithstanding the pile of black bottles, that it would abuse, and, as being such, we gave our assistance to its have been most unconstitutional to have done so. Let reformation ; but we would ratherhave called for the total us now see what might have been the effect of passing abolition of Corporations, than have advocated such an these clauses. The councillors having been illegally alteration of the system as would have had the effect elected, had no right to dismiss any of the officers of the of substituting one set of close boroughs for another. late corporation. But tenants may have paid rents to the When the evening organ of the Ministry, at the time treasurer; were they to pay them over again ? Yes, says of its premature chuckling over the anticipated opera the Government measure. Tenants may have given no- tion of the Municipal Reform Bill, published a list of tices to quit the lands held by them of the Corpora- the boroughs which were for the future to return, ex tion to some legally-constituted body. Were these elusively, Whig-Radical Members to Parliament, both notices to be invalidated ? Yes ! again, says Mi. Newcastle and Warwick, if we mistake not, were Attorney-General. Defendants in suits or actions among the number. But alas for the predictions of may have pleaded as a defence " that there was no the Treasury oracle ! each of those boroughs have been Corporation, and therefore no such deeds as those recently called upon to exercise the elective franchise professing to be executed by the Corporation could —in each of them a Whig-Radical, supported by all exist." Is that legal defence to be rendered a nullity the influence of Government and the most zealous by an ex post facto law ? Yes, yes, to be sure exertions of its creatures, has been met and defeated says Mr. Solicitor-General : and the " Grunticle" by a Conservative ! In the case of the Newcastle grumbles because we reiterate' " No, no." The eases election Mr. Blackett, the Ministerialist, had all the we have here suggested are, we assure the learned advantages of a prior possession of the field ; but Mr. authors of this measure, not altogether imaginary : Hodgson came in at the eleventh hour and signally and we conclude .in the full conviction that we have defeated him. In that borough the political test was shown that much of injustice has been prevented by " appropriation" or "no appropriation," and Mr. the rejection of this measure, and that the Lords have O'Connell had tome time before " agitated" the con here, also, done their duty.—Tinzes. stituency and " laid on the steam ;" but all would not Some of the liberal London journals seem to attach do. The English sense of " justice" and love of con extraordinarystitutional principles triumphed over Government in fluence and measures of confiscation and robbery, pre recently made in Liverpool of the connection which ceded by the banner-bearer of the system of " scull existed between the Marquis of Salisbury and the Li and cross bones" intimidation. The contested elec verpool Standard ; but for our own part we should tions at Devizes, Newcastle, and Warwick, have all consider this " mare's nest"—this " criminal con had similar results, showing the preponderance of n exion"—unworthy of the slightest notice, were it not strength on the side of Conservatism and the Con for the wordy war which it has caused between our B . tution. But, tiin regard to th e W arw i c k e l e c- Reform and Tory contemporaries, and the acrimonious " on, t h ere is one circumstance very remarkable, and spirit which characterises the con t es t. Some twelve t hat is, that the Government candidate—the brother months since we published a list of s e veral Tory pro o f one of the Ministers, found it necessary to gain the vincial papers which were about to be.started at that aood-will of the electors by denouncity , the Ministe time, and though we were perfectly aware that the vial Poor Law Bill—that great and splendid work of funds were for the most part furnished by the Conser- o our Liberal rulers, whose " liberality" never shone so vative chiefs, and in some instances we could even brightly in the eyes of certain Whig-Radical " philo have named the individuals who put down the " need sop°hers" as when they made use of their position in the ful," yet we considered it unnecessary to make any dis- State to grind the poor in the dust, and put down Chris closure or commentary on the subject, as when men tian charity by law ! Mr. Hobhouse, we suppose. publicly profess a certain class of principles, it is but would have been absolved by the Ministry for the fair that they should make every exertion for their difftt crime of denouncing their Poor Law Bill, if by that sion. Nay, more, if men conscientiously entertain means he had succeeded in security , the seat. But certain opinions, it is not only allowable, but commen- • though, in addition, lie promised all those fine things dable to contribute in every way to giving them publi- I 'ell is brother Sir John Cam used to promise ° to city. The Marquis of Salisbury has made no secret which Westminster Radicals, until he got into a snug of his Tory predilections and prejudices, and if he has lace, yet he was defeated by his youthful rival, Mr. by his purse or personal exertions endeavoured to mak e anning, who, until he entered upon this contest, was converts to his party or his politics—insuperable as is wholly unknown in public life. The splendour of his our opposition to both—we do not consider him to de father's name ()mat as it was could have no value in serve censure ; on the contrary, we should rejoice to the eyes of that class of politicians who admit of no see his example followed by his opponents. How can hereditary distinction ; but his addresses showed that men better prove the sincerity of their opinions than he inherits more his father's name, anal that he has ta by paying towards their dissemination ? And it is far lents to support and adorn the cause which he has better that the Tory funds should thus find an outl e t espoused pp —Morning Herald. through newspapers, which to the public ffenerall‘ serve as mere waste paper, than be hoarded up for more corrupt purposes, such as bribery at elections. &c. The English public is now too enlightened to be duped by the shallow artifices of the Tory press. Its support or its opposition has little or no influence on the public mind, and its slander, which, in dearth of argument, is its staple commodity, is purchased only for the gratification of the depraved appetite of time ' most inveterate of the faction. What effect has the ma lignant falsehoods and indecent abuse of the Times, or the classical absurdities of the Standard, on public opinion ? tione, save that the one excites disgust, and the other laughter ; but if they minister to the pru riency of their patrons their purpose is answered. Wc do not see how the Marquis of Salisbury is more subject to attack on account of his connexion with the press than any other nobleman or gentle man who personally a d voca t es t h e same political opi nions. It is surprising that any of our Contempora ries should so stupidly compromise themselves as to stigmatise a nobleman as acting disgracefully in writing for a newspaper. How many Members of the House of Lords, aye, and of the House of Commons, where more intelligence may be fairly supposed to exist, have not the ability to write anything worthy of ins e rti on in a newspaper Why, then, should the Tory Mar quis be blamed for delighting his party by the display of his qualifications as a party scribe ? It is not for advocating the opinions which he entertains, but for entertaining opinions contrary to the general interests, that he merits opprobrium. The Press is usually de signated as the " fourth estate," and though its in fluence is indisputable, we may say paramount, its members in this country do not maintain that supe riority of position in society to which they might fairly lay claim. They are, however, gradually emerging into their true and proper station ; and none, whether noble or gentle, are now so squeamish as to be ashamed of writing in a newspaper, unless their contributions be such as they should blush to acknowledge. We should like to know the name of any Liberal or Tory Member of either House of Parliament who, having the ability to do it, has not, in some way or other, contributed to the columns o f the Journals whose sentiments he adopted. " Alarming exposure," indeed !—Alarming fiddlesticks ! rather. What other " mare's nest" will next be discovered ?—Morning Advertiser. The result of the Warwick electio n has afforded a new proof of the increased and increasing strength of Conservative principles, and the consequent decline of the democratic cause, with which the fortunes and the hopes of Ministers are identified. All frie n d s o f our ancient and mixed Constitution—a Constitution rooted for ages in the soil, and accommodated to the genius of the country, must rejoice at this ; for all sober minded and true-hearted Englishmen know that a triumphant issue to the projeets of the present Mi nisters would be the death-blow of that Constitution which now stands alone in Europe the stay and asylum of enlightened liberty. The issue of the con test for the representation of South Warwickshire was itself pretty strong evidence of the re-action which bad set in against the policy of the Government, that had apostatised from the principles of Lord Grey's Administration to throw itself on the protection of the Irish mendicant demagogue, whom Lord Grey's Govern merit had denounced as the enemy to the peace and prosperity of his country. But great as was the majo rity for the Conservative candidate when the Southern Division of the county was polled, we regard the defeat of the Ministerial candidate for the borough as a still more decisive, demonstration of the sink ing state of the 'Whig-Radical cause, of which Warwick has long been considered one of the strong holds. In all contested elections for counties that have taken place since the last general election, the Ministerial candidates have not only been beaten, but beaten by overwhelming majorities, although in every instance Government influence and the efforts of Whig landlords have been unsparingly used to bring about a different result. These Conservative victories leave no doubt of the sentiments of the rural population ; but theist he Ministers and their Journalists consoled themselvas with the notion that Conservatism would have no chance in the boroughs, whenever a general ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. NORTHERN CIRCUIT—LivERPooL, AuG. 23 3IENDEL AND ANOTHER, ASSIGNEES OF CBOMPTON, A BANKRUPT, V. DOWSON. The bankrupt was a paper manufacturer, carrying on business at a short distance from the town of Wigan. The defendant is a grocer, residing in the town itself. On the Gth of July, last year, the bankrupt absconded from the mills, leaving assets behind him not sufficient, it would ap pear, to pay his creditors one farthing in the pound. One of his brothers, who had for some time been in his employ ment as a traveller, remained at the mills after the bank rupt's departure. On the Bth of July the carrier from Chorley to Wigan, passing the mill, was called back, a large quantity of paper was hastily thrown into the cart, and was carried, by the direction of the prisoner's brother, to the shop of Mr. Dowson, in Wigan. About the 11th of July, another large quantity was sent in carts belong. ing to the mill. The whole amounted to about 150 reams, partly writing-paper, partly paper fit for printing, and partly such as would be used in the defendant's shop, for tying up parcels. It was valued by the plaintiff at from 80/. to 90/. A portion of this paper was, it appears, af terwards sold by the defendant to a stationer in Wigan. For the defendant, it was contended that the transac tion was a fair, and bona fide purchase. The brother of the bankrupt was put into the box, who deposed that he had called on the defendant in the usual way of business as traveller for the bankrupt ; that he asked the defendant for an order, and received one to the amount stated above, That the terms on which he usually dealt with the defendant being cash on delivery he was as usual paid the sum of 56/. 195., the amount of the order, on the delivery of the second parcel. The receipt and the invoices were produced. The former he swore he saw written at the time it bore date, the 11th ; the latter, he said, was sent with, or immediately after, the goods. It did not appear, however, from the books of the bankrupt, nor even from the cash book of the witness himself, that any entry whatsoever had been made as to the amount so alleged to have been received. His LORDSHIP intimated an opinion that the bona fide of the transaction, supposing such to be the case, would not protect the defendant, the delivery of the goods having taken place subsequently to the act of bankruptcy, when the property in them had vested in the assignees ; but he left it to them to say whether, at all events, the transaction was really bona fide or not.—Verdict for the plaintiffs. PAINTER V. LIVERPOOL GAS COMPANY. This was an action of trover, brought in consequence of the seizure and sale of a coach and horses belonging to the plaintiff. They were taken by a Magistrate's warrant for non-payment of rent for gas due to the Company. The defendants originally, it appeared, endeavoured to protect th emse l ve s by this warrant, which, however, it turned out, had been issued without a precedent summons, which it was held would, on ganeral principles, be necessary, though not specially directed in the Act. The plea on which the de fence turned at the trial was one of leave and license by the defendants for the sale. The plaintiff, it appeared, was at the time of the seizure also indebted to the landlord, and while the coach and horses were in the hands of Mr. David Jones, an auctioneer, for sale, he received a letter from the plaintiff, authorising him to sell the property, and to pay a quarter's rent to the landlord. His Lordship decided that this would not at any rate autho r i se a convers i on by the defendants. It was then be u contended th a t, suppos i ng a ver dict for the plaintiff to ( b e 6 n t n ) a w vo o authorised be unavoidable, still the , sale by Mr. David Jones having b y him, the sum for which the goods sold thehe couldm eas measure o r e f u t o h v ei u their value Evidence,i n th. however, s act . on and beyond that was received to show they h were worth considerably more. The witness called for t h is verdict e o a for ch at 601. He admitted, purpose valued them altogether o th wever, that the horses were in very poor condition, and p th re e tt p y lai w ut e i l ff l f :• r o T o . 1. The Jury returned a POLICE HATTON_GARD EN Yesterday John Shuttleworth was examined before Mr. LAING, on the following charge : Sheppard, a constable, No. 28, of the G division, stated that just past four o'clock o n Monday morning he met the prisoner and another man in Benjamin-street, Clerkenwell, carrying a large bundle, and knowing them to be thieves, he approached and collared t hem. The y made a despe rate, resistance, and the prisoner's companion having kicked him down, made his escape ; but the accused was pre vented running away by witness seizing his legs the instant be fell, and keeping him in that situation until another officer came up. The bundle contained a set of harness, the owner of which witness discovered in the course of half an hour afterwards in rather a singular meaner. He re- rHE SUN, LONDON, THURSDAY, AUGUST 25, 1836. turned to his beat after locking the prisoner up, and in pass ing up Holborn, he saw the driver of a cabriolet, No. 831, fast asleep in that vehicle on the coach-stand, and the horse belonging to it lying down between the shafts without any hdrness about it ; and it turned out that while the cabman had been taking his nap, the prisoner and the other man had had the impudence to unharness the horse, and]] walk off with the property in question. Mr. LAING asked if the prisoner was known ? The policeman said he was ; that he had once been con victed at the Old Bailey for theft. The property having been identified, the prisoner was fully committed to take his trial at the next sessions. _ Sophia King, who had a child in her arms, was charged with vagrancy. It appeared from the statement of an officer belonging to the Mendicity Society, that the prisoner was following ladies about in Lamb's Conduit-street, and begging of them, stating that she and her babe were starving, and that their parish would not assist them. Having seen her re ceive money from several persons, he walked her off to the Mendicity office to see if she were known, and being iden tified as a common beggar, he was ordered to take her be fore a magistrate. Mr. LAING (to the prisoner)—l doubt very much whether that child is yours ? Prisoner (impudently)— I suppose you know. Mr. LAING—To whom does it belong? Prisoner— Why, to my sister. Mr. LAING—What brings you with it ? Prispner—l take it out with me to beg, to be sure. Mr. LAING—SO that's the way you excite commisera tion ? Prisoner—That's just it. Mr. LAING—You are as fit a subject for the House of Correction as I have met with for some time, and I shall send you for a month. Prisoner—Just as you please. Mr. LAlNG—Where does your sister live ? Prisoner— St. Helen's-place, Whitecross-street. The child was then, by order of Mr. Laing, taken from her and sent home, and she was committed to the treadmill. James Davies, a chimney sweeper, was charged by James Hall, one of the chummy fraternity, with having given him a severe " bonnetter" on his Sunday tile, thereby injuring it, and causing him'to go in fear. Hall, in the peculiar phraseology of his tribe, said, " Your Vurship, the prisoner is vun o'these ere chaps vot goes about -the streets 'fringing the statty o' the law by calling out serveep,' to the noyance o'the respectable part o'the community o'the people, and I am a respectable master serveep rot lays the informations. On Thursday last I came to this here hoffice and conwicted a lot on 'em, and on leaving the hoffice, Davies gave me a bonnetter' on this here hat (holding up a dirty gossamer, which seemed to .have suffered materially from soot and bonneting, the roof being broken in), and he then kicked me behind, and called me a b-- old rogue, a binformer, and sevore that masters ought to be gag g ed as vel as the men, and that ere's all I got to say yourVorship" (making a low bow). Other witnesses proved the assault. The prisoner denied having " bonnetted" Mister Hall ; he only pushed by him, and he thought, as how, it was a werry bard case thsat a set o' poor fellows, who had been prentice to get a respectable liveliwood, should be sent to prison for calling out serveep, ven other people cried cabbage plants and savoys o ! and dustmen and postmen rang their bells and made more noosince. The Magistrates ordered bim to pay 10s.; or be com mitted for seven days to the House of Correction. Prisoner—l'm blow'd, then, if I doesn't go to the mill, I'se sure to get grub and a bed there ; Mister Hall shan't get ten bob out o' me. He was informed the penalty went to the King. Prisoner—Vel, I'd rather the King should have it than him. Q UEEN- S QUARE. THE ROBBERY IN VAUXHALL GARDENS.—Yesterday Mary Ann Emery, a pretty-looking woman, but well known on the pave, who stands charged with having robbed Mr. J. G., a Lieutenant in a Regiment of Foot, of cash and Bank of England notes to the amount of upwards of 601., in Vauxhall Gardens, on Friday evening, the sth instant, was brought before Messrs. GREGORIE and BURRELL for re-examination. The prisoner was apprehended on the 7th instant by Sergeant Otway, of the A division, but, in consequence of the prosecutor having gone to Scotland, she had been re manded until he returned to town. Lieutenant G. deposed, that on the evening of the sth inst. he went, accompanied by a friend, to Vauxhall Gar dens, and while there he was accosted by the prisoner, who remained in his company some time. She endeavoured to persuade him to accompany her home, but he told her that he was with a friend,•and could not leave the Gardens. She then told him that she would sit upon a bench and await his return. He had not left her, many minutes before he discovered that he had been robbed of all his cash, amount ing to 651., and upon his return to the spot where he had left her, she had disappeared. Mr. GREGORIE—Had you gone into the crowd at all? —Prosecutor—l had not, and I had only received the money on the day previously from the army agent of my regi men t. Mr. GREGORIE—What did the money consist of ? Prosreutor--Two 20/. notes, one 10/., two 5/., and five sovereigns, all of which were secured in my purse, and de posited in my trowsers pocket. Mr. GREGORIE—Are you certain that you had this money about you when you were first accosted by the pri soner ?—Prosecutor—l am. Vv Mr. Thomas Williams, a tradesman in Lambeth, deposed that he chanzed a 201. note for the prisoner, who had made purchases of linen-drapery at his shop, and he had indorsed the name of Mary Ann Emery upon it, which name the prisoner had given. Mr. GREGORIE—DO you recollect the amount of her purchases ?—Witness--I do not. Mr. GREGORIE—When was this ?—Witness—On the Gth of August. Joseph Bridge, an assistant of Walmsley and Co., pawn brokers in London-road, Southwark, deposed, that he had known the prisoner for some time. On the 6th instant, she came to the shop, redeemed a gold watch, and in payment changed a 10/. note ; at the same thee she purchased a brooch. The note was endorsed by witness, and has subse quently been paid into the Bank of England. Mr. Henry William Chalk, clerk in the accountant's office of the Bank of England produced two notes which had been paid into the Bank, one for 20/., and the other foy 10/., and Mr. Williams identified the 20/. note as the one he had changed for the prisoner, and the pawnbroker's as sistant, Bridge, fully identified the other. Serjeant Otway stated that he had first traced the pri soner to Brixton, but apprehended her at her lodgings, No. 65, Vauxhall -street, Lambeth: When he took her she was in the act of packing up all her wearing apparel, and said that she was going for a month's sojourn into the country. Upon questioning her, she admitted having been with the prosecutor, but denied all knowledge of the robbery. Upon searching her he found nine sovereigns, a quantity of silver, a gold watch, and eleven duplicates. The prisoner, by the advice of her attorney, declined saying anything in her defence, and was fully committed for trial. MARLBORO UGH-STREET. Lucy Wadnell was yesterday brought before Mr. CHAM BERS for final examination, charged with having illegally pawned some bridles and other articles, the property of Wm. Murray, Esq., of Lower Grosvenor-street. It appeared that the prisoner's husband lived as coach man with Mr. Murray, but having recently caused the death of a valuable horse, and otherwise grossly miseon ducted himself, he was dismissed. His wife, who was also in Mr. Murray's service, was allowed out of compas sion to retain her situation, and was otherwise very kindly treated. When Mr. Murray returned to town he disco vered that the prisoner had taken several articles of his property, and had pledged them in the name of one of his other -female domestics. Considering her conduct as pe culiarly ungrateful, she having property of her own in the house which she could have raised more money upon than the amount obtained by pledging what was not her own, he caused her to be taken into custody. The prisoner said that the name in which she had pledged the property was her maiden name. Mr. CHAMBERS directed that the prisoner should pay a fine of double the value of the articles pledged, or go to prison for two months. - William Beck was charged with having assaulted Jane Bevan. The complainant stated she was engaged a few days as housemaid in the family of a gentleman named Fry, who keeps the baths in St. James's-place. The defendant was a servant also, and his place was to attend the baths. From the day on which she had been in her situation up to a day or two ago, the defendant had conducted himself with great indecency towards her, although he was a married man, and also knew that she was a married woman. Two female servants in the establishment of Lady Clinton called to pay her a visit, and the defendant conducted himself in the same scandalous manner towards them. Complainant told her master of the fellow's behaviour, but Mr. Fry could not then attend to the complaint, as he was going out of town. Complainant went out that afternoon, and in the evening was accompanied home by her husband, as she feared again being attacked by the defendant. When she got in she found the defendant and his wife in the hall, who both began abusing, and she was compelled to call her husband to protect her. The defendant's wife (while the husbands were fighting) attacked her, tore her bonnet from her head, and used her with such violence that it was necessary to call in the assistance of the police. A witness proved the assault, and another female said she could bring forward evidence that the defendant had for some time been practising his filthy conduct towards the fe males in the house. Mr. Fry, who was present, said he certainly would not permit such a character as the defendant to remain under his roof. He had no knowledge whatever of the defen dant's conduct until the complainant told him how he had acted. Mr. CHAMBERS said, as the defendant stood a chance to lose both situation and character, he should not put a very heavy fine on him. The defendant was ordered to pay 20s. and costs. . The defendant a short time since swept a crossing. He 1 was employed to carry boards, with the address of the baths on them, and soon afterwards was promoted to the compa ratively-respectable situation of bath manager. A personage of imposing exterior, whose velvet-faced dress -coat, flowered silk waistcoat, and glittering neckchain and brooch, in the chiaroscuro of the clerk's office pre sented the fac-simile of a swell of the first magnitude, in a towering passion, applied to one of the officers for an as sault warrant, and having talked in a very magnificent manner of an atrocious assault, ungentlemanly conduct, in jured honour, &c., he was shown into the Magistrates' room, and the party complained against was immediately sent for. The defendant, with an air of prodigious consequence entered the office—his dress, however, afforded a ludicrous contrast to his lofty manner, for the short jacket which he wore allowed more than one portion of his body linen to appear through the numerous places for ventilation in his never-to-be-mentioned femoral garment. This unprovoked outrage, began the complainant, oc curred in consequence of the defendant telling me, the mo ment he saw me, that I owed three-halfpence for half a pint of hot coffee. Mr. DYER—Pray who are you ? Complainant—l am a member of a celebrated fashionable establishment in Bond street, and the defendant is a coadjutor. Officer—Your Worship, they are both journeyman tailors.—(Laughter.) The complainant, with great warmth, proceeded to detail the rise and progress of the quarrel, and after much unpar liamentary language had ensued, the defendant committed an assault, the particulars of which, said the complainant, I am ashamed to state to your Worship. MAGISTRATE—You must explain how you were assaulted. Complainant—Must I ? Well, he pulled my nose, and then he spit in my face. Pardon me, your Worship, said the defendant, bowing profoundly, Pardon me for trespassing on your Worship's time ; but a duty I owe to the public hobligatos me to lay a statement of facts before your Bench. That individual, in the most ungentlemanly manner, wanted to chisel the boy as supplies us with evening refreshment out of half a pint of coffee. I taxed him with the charge, and he re• plied, " You are a d—d liar." Dare, said I, to apply such an übrupt epitaph to my character, and I'll instantly sacri fice you to my resentment. Will you, says he. You are a nasty-nosed puppy. Now, your Worship, as a man and a gentleman, I put it to you, would you not have acted just as I did ? I seized his proboscis, and certainly I did ex pectorate on his countenance. NIT. DYER—Have you any witness who heard the oppro brious names applied to you ? Another tailor stepped forward to depose that the names were applied ; and, clenching his fist, violently de clared that, bad the same names been applied to him, he would have knocked a thundering hole through his ugly carcass. The case was then dismissed. William Evans was charged with having stolen 701bs. of lead from an untenanted house, kept possession of by a man named Sheen. The policeman, 42 C, deposed that he had found the prisoner, at four o'clock on Saturday morning, at the corner of Marshall-street, with clothes covered with mortar and dirt. He inquired where he had been, and was told in Marlborough-mews. A little time afterwards the lead was found near the spot where he had been first by the policeman, and the prisoner was taken into custody on suspicion of stealing. Another man was with the prisoner a few minutes before he was first seen, and it was thought that this man, whose name is Sheen, had been concerned in having the lead removed from a house of which he retains possession, in spite of the landlord. The officers are in search of Sheen, and the prisoner was remanded for a week. MARYLEBOIVE. ROBBERY.—Yesterday Henry Palmer, alias Solonzons, a journeyman baker, formerly in the employ of Mr. Bennett, of Goodge-street, Tottenham-tout-road, was charged be fore Mr. RAWLINSON with having stolen 861., the property of Mary Williamson, a servant in the employ of Mr. Lee, the proprietor of the Hercules Pillars public-house, Great Queen-street, Lincoln's Inn-fields. The evidence against the prisoner was rather extraordi nary, and is in substance as follows : The father of the prosecutrix, who resided at No. 7, Richardson's-buildings, Goswell-street-road, being on his death-bed, sent for his daughter on Friday last, and deli vered to her the amount in question, which he had saved by a long course of penurious habits. It consisted of sixty-four sovereigns and 221. in silver, all tied up in a piece of old linen. The girl having taken leave of her father for the last time, proceeded home with the money, which having shown to her master and mistress, she deposited in her box up stairs. The prisoner, who was out of employment, and lodged in the same house, by some means or other found out that the girl was possessed of the money ; and on Sunday morning he broke open her box, and abstracted the con tents. He then proceeded to the lodging of Henry Stir ling, a journeyman baker, who had succeeded him in Mr. Bennett's employ, where he counted the money, and having made Stirling a present of five pounds in silver, and having had something to drink, he took his leave. In the evening he went into the Sawyer's Arms public-house, in Maryle bone-lane, where, after having drunk pretty freely, he counted the money in the tap-room, and obtained five sove reigns for the same value in silver of Mr. Macpherson, the landlord. Mr. Macpherson's suspicions being roused, he called in police constable 100 D, who took the prisoner into custody just as he had quitted the house ; and on searching him at the station-house upwards of seventy pounds in gold and silver were found in his posseesion, tied up in a piece of rag, which, upon inquiry, was found to be part of the money which he had stolen from the prosecutrix, in the way already described. Stirling, the journeyman baker, not liking appearances, deposited the five pounds which the prisoner had given him in the hands of Mr. Bennett, his master, who here produced it. The rag in which the money was wrapped was identified by the prosecutrix. The prisoner, who declined saying anything in his de fence, was fully committed to Newgate to take his trial. LAMBETH-STREET. THE DANGER OF SOLDIERS WEARING SIDE-ARMS WHILE OFF Du'ry.—Yesterday a private belonging to the Cold stream Guards, who gave his name at the station-house Robert Whitehead, but whose real name is John Ward, was charged before Mr. HARDWICK and two county Magistrates with being drunk and disorderly on the preceding night, and also assaulting and attempting to draw his bayonet on a policeman. A waiter at an eating-house in Rosemary-lane, said that on the night before, at about twelve o'clock, the prisoner came into his master's house, and asked for a plate of meat and some vegetables, which came to 7d. On being asked for the money he had only 2d. about him, and on his (witness's) attempting to take back the plate of meat, he snatched the greater part of it away, and eat it. His con duct besides was so violent that they were obliged to send for the assistance of the police to remove him. Police-constable Burrows, No. 103 H, said, that being called on by the last witness, he went up to the door of the eating-house, and saw the prisoner conducting himself in a very outrageous manner ; but being inside the house he could not take him. He however remonstrated with him on his conduct. The prisoner rushed at him—caught him by the throat so tightly, that the button of his collar gave way. He also made use of the most violent expressions, and had his bayonet drawn half out of the sheath, when he (witness) seized it, and wrested it from him. Prisoner—You know I never attempted to use my bayonet, but that you took it away from me, and I'd as soon go to my quarters without my head, as my side-arms. Policeman—l swear that you had your hand on it, and had it half way out when I disarmed you for my own pro tection. Mr. IlaaDwicK—Was the prisoner very drunk and dis orderly ? Policeman—Yes, very much so, your Worship. The sergeant of the company to which the prisoner be longs was present, and in answer to a question as to what character he bore, he, the sergeant, said that he was fre quently in the habit of getting drunk, and when so was ex ceedingly violent, and very often ill-used the soldiers who were sent after him to take him to his quarters. It was also stated that his conduct at the station-house on the preceding night was excessively violent. At the suggestion of Major Elrington, the Fort Major at the Tower, where the prisoner is stationed, he was sent in custody before the commanding officer, to be punished for a breach of military discipline. WORSHIP- STREET. Yesterday the LORD MAYOR attended at this office, to support a charge which he bad preferred against the driver of Kerrison's Hackney stage-coach, of having, by his furious driving, and other misconduct, endangered the lives of his Majesty's subjects. The Magistrates on the Bench at the time were Mr. BROUGHTON, M r . GROVE, and Mr. BURRELL, the last mentioned gentleman beint himself an applicant against the driver of another coach. Mr. Kerrison appeared to the summons, but produced the actual offender, the driver of his coach, a young man, East, whose father, known for many years as a stage=coach man upon the Hackney-road, killed himself not long since by drinking a pint of gin at one gulp. The LORD MAYOR being sworn, stated that on the 16th instant, while driving through Hackney in a gig towards Essex, he saw an omnibus approaching him at a moderate rate, but at some distance beyond that he observed the de fendant's stage-coach, the driver of which was lashing his horses until he got them into a gallop, in order to cut past the omnibus. His Lordship felt that he was in danger of being overturned through the stage-coach driver's miscon duct, and some of the passengers on the stage evidently en tertained the same apprehension. A gentleman named Barnes, who was in the chaise with the Lord Mayor at the time, confirmed his Lordship's statement. yV ~ Thomas East, the driver, said that one of the horses was a " kicker," which made it necessary for him to use the the lash, and thus caused the furious going complained of. The LORD MAYOR said the fact was, that the driver lashed the horse into that state in order to cut out the omnibus, and it was not a solitary offence. His Lordship said he was constantly passing and repassing on that road, and frequently witnessed the misconduct of this driver, and had several times spoken to him and endeavoured to check his misconduct, but without effect. His driving was of a very dangerous kind, and his object evidently was to dog and cut out the other vehicle. Mr. Kerrison, the proprietor, assured the Magistrates that he would not encourage any such misconduct ; on the contrary, he particularly cautioned his servants against furious driving, which not only endangered people's lives, but also injured his horses, of which he was particularly careful. The LORD MAYOR intimated that he had intended to say as little as possible in aggravation, but he asked Mr. Kerrison if it was not a fact that he had some time ago sold the omnibus to a person named Noble, and that he now employed the stage-coach in opposition to drive off the road that person's widow, to whom the omnibus at present belonged? Kerrison denied that he had any such intention, and said that it was not he but his brother who sold the omnibus to Noble, five years ago. The LORD MAYOR expressed his belief that young East, a notoriously furious driver, was employed for the purpose he had mentioned. East said he was not trying to cut out the omnibus, as his Lordship supposed, but one of his horses was a violent kicker, which required the whip. Mr. BROUGHTON, as well as the LORD MAYOR, Ob served, that if through the employment of such a horse, or misconduct of the drivers, any lives were lost, they well knew they were liable to indictment at the Old Bailey. Kerrison said he did not encourage any improper con duct, and as a proof of it he would not employ East again, or pay the penalty now inflicted on him, even if he lay in prison for seven years, having previously cautioned him. East expressed his regret for what had occurred, but he still ascribed it to the propensity of his horses to kicking, and to running away, rather than to his use of the whip. The LORD MAYOR reminded the driver of the frequent cautions given to him, and said that he had found it neces- sary to make this application for the protection of the public generally as well as himself, against such dangerous conduct ; but he had no wish to press in this instance for a heavy pe nalty. Mr. BURRELL, the Magistrate, here said that he had himself frequently seen the defendant's coach, driving along in the way described by the Lord Mayor. Mr. BROUGHTON, in whose observations Mr. Grove en tirely concurred, said there could be no doabt of the (defen dant's misconduct, and if he ever appeared there again he should be visited with the heaviest penalty. On this occa sion they mitigated it to 50s. and the costs. The LORD MAYOR then retired, but on entering his carriage he was informed by a messenger that the defen dant, who had previously expressed his inability, had paid the 555, rather than be imprisoned. His Lordship, how ever, sent word back that he had come there merely for the sake of the public, and he desired that the money he had paid as costs, and his moiety of the penalty, should be applied to some charitable purpose. William Page, proprietor and driver of the hackney coach 249, was afterwards convicted of furious driving, upon the evidence of James Tilt, the office gaoler, and fined 10s. and costs, which he paid. UNION-HALL. Yesterday Michael Guilday was brought before Mr. JE REMY, charged with being concerned with two other men not in custody, in knocking down and robbing a gentleman named Tennant, on the preceding night. The complainant stated, that as he was returning borne on the preceding night, about eleven o'clock, as he passed the corner of White-street, on the Dover-road, he saw three men, one of whom spoke to him, asking him where he was going. He replied, that he was going home, and walked on quickly, in order to avoid them ; but had not proceeded many yards when he was struck a violent blow on the back of the head, which felled him to the ground. While he vas lying prostrate, a sudden snatch vas made at his tiat, and be then saw the prisoner and the two other men make off, he made an alarm, and in a short time afterwards, the prisoner, whom he immediately recognised as one of the assailants, was taken into custody. The complainant's hat was found at a short distance from the spot when the prisoner was se cured, but he asseverated his innocence, and accounted for his having been seen running subsequently to the outrage, by a declaration that he was hurrying off for a doctor for his wife, who was taken in the pains of labour a moment before he left borne. The complainant having reiterated that he was confident of the prisoner's identity, the latter acknowledged that on his way for a medical man he saw the complainant struck by a man in the road, but that he (prisoner) being in a state of such anxiety about his wife's precarious situation, he went on about his business, and did not interfere in the case. He then said that he was earning an honest liveli hood by selling old clothes and other articles, and that the complainant was completely mistaken in his identity. Inspector Brown, division M, described that the prisoner was the associate of thieves, and that he had been fre quently in custody on charges of robbery; that he was constantly lurking about the spot where the complainant was knocked down, at which place some daring robberies, attended with violence, had been recently committed. Several silk pocket-handkerchiefs were found in the pos session of the prisoner, who said that he had purchased them to sell again. He was fully committed on the capital charge. John Frederick Muller, a man of military appearance, wearing mustachios, was charged on suspicion with stealing a phaeton, the property of Thomas Alford, a coachmaker, of Newington Butts. The complainant stated that the prisoner hired a phaeton from him, for which he was to pay an annual sum as long as it remained in his possession. Some days ago, however, the complainant traced his phaeton to the possession of a pawnbroker in the New Cut, and on questioning him re specting it, his reply was, that he had lent the sum of 121. on the vehicle to the prisoner, who was to have paid him at the rate of a guinea a quarter for stable-room until he redeemed it. The pawnbroker also said that the prisoner did not keep up his payments, and conceiving that the phaeton was his property, he intended to have disposed of it, bad not a claimant come forward on the occasion. The prisoner said that although he was given into cus tody on a charge of felony, he had no intention of com mitting an act which would have placed him in such a predicament. He admitted that he had the phaeton of complainant, agreeing to pay him so much per annum for its hire, and also that he had borrowed a sum of money subsequently of the pawnbroker on it ; but that it was always his intention to have repaid it, to have got the ve hicle, and to have given it up to the complainant. Adverse circumstances, however, had prevented him from carrying his intention into effect, although, if he had time, it should be done. The Magistrate said that a case of illegally pawning was clearly made out against the prisoner, and therefore the charge of felony, upon which he had been given into custody, would be abandoned, the evidence not being sufficiently strong to constitute that offence. The Magistrate then in flicted a fine of 20s. on the defendant, and 2.51., the value of the phaeton ; and in default of paying these several sums, he was to be committed three months to hard labour in the House of Correction. THAMES OFFICE. Yesterday William Shepherd, a waterman, was brought before Mr. BALLANTINE and Mr. BRODERIP, charged with committing an assault on George Lynch, the m as t er o f t h e George Canning, a Greenwich steamer. The complainant stated that the vessel was going down the River, on Wednesday evening, with a great num b er of passengers on board, and in Limeho use - reac h met t h e defendant, who was in his wherry, row i ng across t h e stream towards Pageant-stairs, Rotherhithe. He hailed him to row clear of the steamer, instead of which he rowed right across her bows, and he immediately directed the engines to be eased, to prevent his being run down, and the vessel was stopped. The prisoner's boat then cleared the bows in safety, on which he backed his wherry astern, went aft, and taking a staple out of a box, threw it at him. The instrument passed over the engineer's head, who was standing up above the engine -room, struck the paddle-box, and, rebounding, fell on him (Lynch), but without doing him any material inj ur y. Th e pr i soner then picked up another staple and threw at the mate, who was at the wheel. He stoop e d an d th e i ron s taple just missed his head and fell on th e d ec k, w h ere it s tuck. The iron sta ples with sharp points were produced. The defendant, in reply to the charge, said he Ras rowing across the water, and the steamer came down so fast th a t he expected sh e wou ld go o ver and drown him. He w as very much alarm e d, and sung out, on which he was laughed at by the people on board, and was so exasperated that, in _.-~ a fit of passion, he threw the staples at the people in the steamer. He was very sorry for what he had done. Mr. BALLANTINE said, if the captain of the steamer told. truth, the defendant was rowing quite across the bow of the vessel, and Lynch then stopped her, and what else couldhe have done under the circumstances. Mr. BRODERIP—And when the staples were thrown all danger was over. It is an outrage which deserves severe punishment. The vessel was full of passengers, and if t he staples had struck any of them , the consequences muse have been fatal, the defendant would have been charged with murder. The sharpness of the weapo ns was proved by their sticking in ti? deck. It was a most in famous proceeding. The defendant said the steamers had frequently swamp ed his and other boats. He was often placed in great danger by them. Mr. BALLANTINE said that such conduct as the defen dantL had been guilty of, was not the way to remedy the grievance. The steamers had enough to answer for, ant' a Coroner's Jury had, only the day before, levied a deodana of 1001. on a steam-ship, which had caused the death of a woman, which was a very proper decision ; but be fre quently observed that when the steamers were going along with all the care they could, the watermen put themselves right in the way, or began hooting and hissing, or throwing missiles at the passengers. It was nit to be borne. Defendant—l have not done it, Sir, indeed. Mr. BALLANTINE—But you have done it. I often see the steamers disturbed, and the passengers annoyed. The people have nothing to de with your quarrels. It is a fac t that you often put yourselves right in the way. Come here if they do you any damage. The defendant was then sentenced to pay a fine of 31. td' the King, and the costs. Air. Mussey, the owner of the George Canning, said be had given strict orders that the steamer should be navi gated in a manner not to injure any one, or place life hr danger. He earnestly entreated the Magistrates to remit the penalty, on account of the poverty of the waterman‘ Mr. BALLANTINE said it could not be done ; arrd Mr' BRODERIP expressed his surprise that such a question should be asked. The defendant was very well off ; it had been a question with the Bench, whether he ough not to have been fined 51. It was not a question between the watermen and the steamers, but whether the lives Of his Majesty's subjects were to be placed in jeopardy on the river. The Magistrates, in allusion to the death of , Mrs. Cran' nis, who was drowned by the neglect on board the Ente' prise steam-ship, said as the Coroner's Jury had fully in" vestigated the circumstances of the accident, and had levied a heavy deodand on the vessel, there would be no occasion for the Bench to inquire into the matter again, and the summonses issued against the master and pilot would be. discharged. They expressed their warm approbation 0 ; the verdict of the Jury, the deodand they had levied, ana the opinion they had expressed. It was the only way to check any negligence, or bad conduct, on the part of the steamers. Mr. BALLANTINE took occasion to remark that steamed were now so numerous, and were so constantly running uP, and down i n a ra pid manner, that too much caution could not be used. The decision of the jury would have at very useful effect in checking any recklessness. He could 136 i help observing that some vessels going very fast made les s swell than others going slow. There were the tow.ing steamers always creeping along very slowly, but they P on all their force, and agitated the river from one side o the other. ANOTHER STEAM-BOAT ACCIDENT.— On TtieS' day afternoon the Comet Gravesend steam-packet, on her voyag e to London, run down a boat, containing four gentlemen+ in Bugsby's-hole, between Greenwich and Woolwich. The steamer was comin g u p th e r i ver a t f u ll s p ee d, and the boa' containing the four amateurs, who had been down the rives to see Messrs. Robinson and Lewis practising previous to Or' intended wager, were going the same way. The CaPt t _ t made signs for them to p rocee d i n a p art i cu l ar direction, but from some misunderstanding, and alarmed by the velocity the Comet, they did not do so, and the steamer struck tli e ' boat and cut it down. Two of the party jumped out on Or side of the boat, and two on the other, with great dexterity , ie order to avoid the paddles, not more than two seconds before° the collision took place, and thus saved their lives. The steame r was stopped, and a boat instantly lowered from the dayite' which picked up one gentleman. The others were saved by the skiff of the Henry, Captain Lambert, and other ships' boats! the men in which displayed praiseworthy alacrity. They were all taken to London in the Comet, and were provided with dry clothing. The boat was cut in two, and the escape of t he gentlemen was really'miraculous. A CAMELION-HORSE.—A French paper states that a M. De Caux nas in his possession, at Voyau, De e r, Trelon, a young handsome horse, that has already change, i 1' colour three times. Till the horse was two years old he 0 1 2 a bay brown, then he became an iron-grey, and soon a ft e rware re-assumed his former colour. Now long locks of white harp are growing on his back a nd a ll d own hi s s h ou ld ers . k expected that he will soon become a perfectly w hi te horse . At a coal-wharf i n th e S tran d t h ere is a black wag gon-hors . with a tuft of ver y l ong w hi te h a i r grow i ng from the u pper He is called the Dandy Duke, from wearing an Imperial. The Salisbury Herald of Saturday reports the V C "; ceedings of a Society established for the relief of the r °° ,,, Clergy. Upon this occas i on , among ot h er d onat i ons , wa ste grant to the perpetual curate of a village containing upW 9 of 500 souls, who performs two services on the Sabbath , no private property, a wife and two children dependent him, and the whole of whose income from his curacy bes at r therto be en on l y 30 1. Thi rty poun d s a year f or a clergYlT? a , and his fa m ily I C ontrast t hi s p i tt ance—not 2s. a day--eble, the imm ense revenue rece i ve d b y a Bi s h op, an d t h en s ay "! ther the recently passed Church Bill ought to be a final mea sure. SETS OF PLATED DISH COVERS, WI T STRONG SILVER EDGES, may be selected from of 111 °a Patterns, pri ce 201. th e Set, at T. COX SAVORY'S, W ° l o . Goldsmith, Sil versm i t h, an d W a t c hm a ker, 47, C orn hill, Lon 16, The Set consists of one cover 20 inches diameter, one of 18, 14, and 12 inches. erior N.B. The SHOW-ROOM contains a large variety of OP j ot Silver-edged Plated Goods. A Pamphlet given gratis, wit n oco , of Prices of Silver Spoons and Forks, Silver Plate, Plated G° Watches, Clocks, &c. BITHS. On the 14th inst., at Burton ß Cottage, Leintwardine, ger efo4' shire, the lady of John Gwilliam, Esq., of a son and heir. On the 22d inst., at Pengelly House. Cheshunt, Herts, th e '— of the Hon. C. L. Buller, of a son and heir. On the 23d inst., at Connaught-terrace, the lady of P. N. Esq., of a son. On the 21st inst., at Cheltenham, the lady of J. Skyward , P l"' of a daughter. O r°. On the 23d inst., in Lansdowne-place, Brunswick-squar e ; H. Wakefield, of a daughter. On the 18th inst., the lady of Major Dickson, of a daughter. of * On the 23d inst., in Robert-street, Adelphi, Mr. G. Cat e* daughter. goo' On the 22d inst., at Datchet Vicarage, the lady of CaptaL crief, of a daughter. p ki eely On the 20th inst., at Mitcham, Mrs. C. Rivington, of square, of a son. „ On the 21st inst., the lady of John L uc i us D am pi e r, -EA' , daughter. 0 3 On the 22d inst., at Streatham-hall, Mrs. Frederick Goa.s"' a daughter. On the 22d inst., Mrs. Christopher Cuff, of a daughter. .4 DK On the 20th inst., at Sheffield, the lady of J. M. Savag e ' Royal Horse Artillery, of a son. f WO . On the 22d inst., at Ivy-lod ge , Ed geware - roa d, the lady 0 Baynes, Esq., of a daughter. ____. . ol eti On the 23d inst., at Tr M inity ARRIED Church, Chelsea. Lewin h Esq., of Gunby Park, Lin co l ns hi re , t o Jane, second datigu"- the late Rev. IL Peach, of Cheam, Surrey. r-; On the 2.3 d inst., at Ch r i s t Ch urc h, J. B a nkes Friend , ~ Woburn-square, to Ellen, youngest daughter of Richd. r . ° ‘,o Esq., Treasurer of Christ's Hospital. T ss, On the 23d inst., at St. Marylebone Church, Henry of Esq., of Lincoln's Inn, to Mary Philippa, the youngest dauguk- Capt. H. Bradburne, late of the Queen's Bays. -d e, On the 23d inst., at St. Bride's Church, Mr. J. J. Burl) , Fleet-street, to Ellen, youngest daughter of tho late J. Pate , of Freckenham. On the 23d inst., Mr. Henry Austin, Bermondsey, to Emily, youngest daughter of Robert F aun tl er oy, Esq., of the Kent-road. DIED. pi. , On the 22d inst., at Norwood, John Warrington Roger's of Manchester-buildings, Westminster, aged 52. 0 . feq" 1. , On the 18th inst., at Devonport, aged 76, Daniel 4'' il surgeon and accoucheur. ' lie G' On the 21st inst., at St. Nicholas, Isle of Thanet, Bricig low, Esq. a 68 ' On the 19th inst., at Kimnbolton, Huntingdonshire, %i e for John Pierson, Esq., many years Coroner and High Cons," the Hundred of Leightonstone. 76. a On the 12th inst., Mrs. Taylor , of East Retford, ag— ..A r 9- 4 On the 22d inst., aged 61, Elizabeth, relict of G. Fitche ' of Clarendon-place, Edgeware - road. g reoo On the 23d inst., aged 88, William Row, Esq., of.Fsge . ".• Tottenham. On the 13th inst. , at Galway , Isaac Robson, Esq 2 ,M n ari zi $ : 1* FAV the Provincial Bank of the same place, son of Isaac lio° - " i late of the Paragon , Hackney. On the 21st inst., at Islington, aged 73, Mrs. Le Diell, relic t 0. Mr. G. Le Dieu. • f 1-1* C. On the Ist of July, at Alexandria, Maryetza, the wife o Agnew, Esq., aged 21. , n Gore' On the 21st inst., at Datch e t, Vi ce -Ad m i r al Sir . I° ' _ A a d, a- - 7 K ; ,O C vvn . Bit William iea G m2 . 2 C Ed . a H ri nn . ssth. a, w a t, Esq.,Lave Lavender-terrace, d e e . o r - te Solicitorr rac e , W o a f n hisd s w V a l; r '' sty ~ 00 r toms for upwards of 52 years. On the 21st inst., at Trumpington, Cambridgeshire, j o hn OW nington, Esq. late 0. I z ReOionagthiee, 2 E o s t q h ., in m s a t. r , in ag e e a d rt s is , t Agnes, eldest child of the dau T hte th r e of lO vi th ril iin ia s in t., H in eo L r o y nd w on h m , it ag eh e e n o d r - e lde st ; t % . l .i.Nr de . r: f i to c h / fe qope g ' Dartford, Kent. On the 16th inst., Edwin Grant, Esq., surgeon , gon, Clifton. st 3 , 2, E A sq n . n , usr e 'tbs On the 21st inst., in Bulstrode-street, 111anchester-5,1, to 40, Edward Turner Bennett, Esq., F.L. S. , Ise., Secrets.., 0. Zoological Society of London. Twieke nba _, On the 23d inst., Mrs. Watson, Mf!E!1i::ff' . .,:.....0, -.... ....._... -- .'__L_-_—___,_-___2!._.....- -------- _____.----------_-;r2 of ,'• ~ nUiNu . ' c ouov London: Printed and Published by MURDO Y— the 112, Strand, at The Sun O ffi ce, No. 112, Strand, in of Middlesex. late o rills;