The Sun. — London, England, 1808-12-10 00:00:00

~_f Lil , ll/' REPORT: COURT OF CHANCERY, Dr.c. 9 . - Exrd...LOW.TIIER V. 7FIANtS Oti THE I.,.INEDAI.£ . , • . . ESTATES., • this case a tiff' had - been . filed by- the Plaintiff ; arbirr4fihe paid by the 14 fidtatItt.iont ht..8111 - 1 - I : entlMatioti:on the Lordship of -. 'dn'''::iceoiAit of the :LOrd, who is now a inin,w. The. tenants pled a customary -20 penny a lt l 6` ; nd the Master of the Bolls direded an issue ?iS'be slie'COuit of Common 'PleaS, for the purrioue o determining the Customs of the Manor's, 'in' this respetq. The issue was' tried tried before Sir JA7\M , i. MANSFIELD, Z3lld• the Jury gage a verdi& .for Defendanis, thereby estahlishing they 20. petiny 'fine— The Chief - Justice . who tried the case . grartod his 'certificale, approving of. the veidiet of the Jury. - The Pl.fintiti, LoWcver, afterwai . dS moved fora new trial, on the ground that the verdo kvaS Contiary 'to all •the evidenCe adduced. For Though the tenants had succeeded in sheaving nutnbc,:r of instances in which the'fiiies wertuhder the proportion or twenty penny fines, these very instances went to she4r . ,' t [nit there was rib fixed cus -totoary rate. Besides — this, however, there was a Deciee the - CoMit 'of Char., ty, in the year 1664, which had not been . prodocid on the trial of• the issue, which clearly; . proved the right• of exacting at) arbitrary reasonable, fine. On- the part of the-De fendants, the propriety of granting .a new trial was -hardly denit-d ;: but a was contended, that the same ought to be 'wit Vcost s, partiCularly on account of the .1664 Decree, which hadsnot been heard'-of when ,thelormer issue was tied.' ' t' :Mr. Selif'alit SHEPHERD, Sire ARY.fitrit PIGOT,'I 'and Mr; WETHERALL, this day objeCted to a 'new Vial being granted unless on pavrrient aists. Sir SAMUEL riolvitt,Ly, Mr. Tnomps6N;4Czc. con tended that the. Court could liCit,'COHSlstelltly with the ilea of allowing the parties tO - g'o'to a new trial on equal terms, give the costs of the former-issue -against _ the Plaintiff. What .was this. but saying, Ghat his Lordship •was -satisfied with the verdi& in .the former case,. arid that it .was-nothing but the ad laitional evidence to be produced, which ought, on the new trial; to weigh with" the. Jury On the decree 1664, the Plaintiff, comparatively speaking, • built little. was principally on the ground of the verdict being contrary to all the evidence adduced, that the new trial was demanded.-' The Lorry CHANCELLOR did not hold the Dceree of 1664 as sufficiently conclusive of the clittam of the manor to preclude farther inquiry. If 'the uew trial demanded were td proceed - on the ground of this Decree not having formally been. before the Jury, • he should have _been of opinion that ,costs ought to folio r. This,was not the case.37and he thought it . better, being satisfied that tl)e merits had never : Pro- ! perly beep before the Jury, at least never in the way elaidate4. S. ItoiLLY, that a new trial 4tould b 4 granted,. the question of costs, as was frequent in ti,e practice of that Court.,-being reserved till it should be seen how the case should terminate: His Lordship observed,, that *Fee, different issues had ; been tried before pronouncing the Decree in the • year . 1664, the last of which was a trial at. bar. He should leave it kr the Court of Law to. say., whether a trial at _Bar should not also take place in the present instance. • ZIESSTTER V. WOOD, BART. In this rase a bill had been tiled, for the specific performance of an agreement for the exchange of' certain estates, of equal value,„ in the Borough of Shaftesbusry„ by-the Defendant, an eminent attorney ' in Shaftesbury, against Sir Mark Wood, Bt. and an injuneftOß had been granted,' till the answer should' be given- in, restraining, the Defendant from suing out execution -on an ejeament he had obtained against the Plaintiff at Common Law, 'and turtling , Lim out of the possession of the subjetts, as to the:, contrast for the exchange of which specific perform ance was sought by the bill. The answer being at length given in, fit was now moved that the injunc tion be dissolved. Mr. HART and Mr. RUSSELL sheaved cause why the ivjunCtion should be continued. So far back as, the year 1804,.the Defendant in . ihe present aaiun (then Colonel, noW Sir Mark Wood), whip had lately purch scd a valuable property in Shaftesbury, which had formerly belonged to a Mr. Bryant, agreed to_ exchange the same with the present 'Plain tiff for another property of equal value, in the same place, belOnging to the Plaintiff. An agreement to, this elle& s as committed to writing, and being signed by the parties,. was entrusted to the care of . a Mr. Templar, a [Diana] friend, till the transaction should be concluded by the execution of the neces sary conveyances. The Defendant had so far acted on this agreeintnt as belually to make a Conveyance of a small part of the property, in favour of the Plaintiff, but when called on to complete the con veyance-of the whole, he declined, and ultimately -brought an ejectment, in which he-prevented the Plaintiff having a defence against it by. law*. In his answe - r to the Plaintiff's 1311), the Defend ant had exhibited a very convenient want of memory conne6ted with almost every circumstance which could support the Plaintiff's plea; and as an excuse Tor not perkortning his agreement, had contented himself with stating the exititence of a precedent condition, a sort of pocket defeasance, which, with out explaining the nature or terms of it;he contend '4 had not been Complied with at` the time fixed- for th e Nvrforinance of it, in consequence of which he wa, liberated from .his agrecinent to complekthe 'exchange in questiov. Such a defence, however, his Lordship would not,suifer to avail the Defendant to the extent, •at least, of dissolving the injunction, which mu,t, iu effeal,. by h;verting the,posszssion, determine the merits of the Bib on this interlocutory in ition as ttfe6tually as it could cm: a hearing. _ _ Sir S. ROMILLY and M. COOK ,t,:.rgtied, that as the injunction in this case had been grwted 'only till tale answer should 'be given in, its being:continued or dissolved, - would diipend on the terms of the an swer alone. In his answer, the Defendant h po sitively the existence of a condition to be performed by the Plaintiff, without which the agree-. men: entered into between the patties was not to be carried into etred- 7 -that this condition was limit ed in point of time—that the time hAd expired; and y e z that the condition bad not beets complied with----a course that the agreement for the ex- change • in question-,-dependent . and consequent on thi,: precedent c , ..ndition, had fallen to the•ground. -It might.not ,be proper or becoming ta, trouble his Lordship with the natureof .the condition! alluded to, or to enter the same on the file of that; Court. In the Boroughs in Dorsetshire, Somerset ; atose scrupulous notions of. propriety in.eledion matters might .not , be felt to the same degree• as. in other plates. But it was sufficient barely. to read the-let-. •terof the - Plaintiff. to Mr. Temolar.. the gentleman who was,.to - be the mutual cusiodiar of • the agree ment in question, and also of the conveyances to be granted,, had the transaaion ever gone that 'length, without seeing (bat the Plaintiff had not in his Bill .given a fair state of the case, or one which could ever .in its present shape entitle him to: the equity got that Court. The letter bore that his (Mr.,Templar's) friend ; . Colonel .Wood, ; ailed very .honourably by. M r..Messiter, in ngreeing to Confirm :t he exchange which was to have-been, made•by Mr.. Bryant.: that :though never two properties were more :equal .in -.value, the exchange was, highly agreeable- to him (Mr. M.). as it insured-him" the possession of the house in which .he lived.- That it should be his •ut most endeavour to serve ColonetW, •in every re .sped, acid to induce bis friends to do the same, as a pledge -of which he now sent Mr. Templar. that letter.. He inclosed hint (Mr, T.) the .eounter agree ments to remain -in his hands, as a mutual friend, till the.business should •be entirely settled. The conveyances should ; also be sent to hint when ready, to. remain with him-till afier the, meeting of the next. Parliament ; and ,he (Mr...M.)-hoped whether the in - operty should then remain - Col: .Wood's,,,or be :made over to another, that he and his'friend should, not withstanding, represent it. . The LearneclQokinsel contended, that it. was im-, ..possible to read theletterand rtorsee that the Plain titt had misrepresented' hisscase; atid asked equity where be.was.entitled ; to none. -That- the Defendant ,had been so far untOrtnuate as to giVe to the Plain -411'a conveyance to_sornesruall part of the property, Was to . be. regretted, : : but • it•could-never ,render it im- Teratimon,the Defendant to.give him the, remaining part. Because be had,giveo his cloak be.was: not to give his coat also. Such ,an argument • •tnight indeed have been,of.some avail, had the 'conveyance • even'ota• i?mall part of this property to be exchanged, - bee, Made b, the Plaintiff, bUt _baying been:made `by the Defendant, it must be esteethed sufficient that 'he was content to lose what he had already given, without adding the remainder of his property. • The Loan CH A NCELL . O4I was decidedly of opinion, from 'the *hole tenor of -they Plaintiff's letter, that something conne&ed With eliion puiposes was in the C'ontemplatiOnofthe parties when they executed the agreements in question,: For, it was to be oh .served•that it was not one copy of the agreement only which w as executed, and in which case a mu friend-, wOuld have been necessary to aaas the 'eustOdiar' . '6l it, till tie transaction could be Conclud `ed ; . :b'orthere were here: actually two copies of the , wit-cement, and yet both . duplicates W'eee depo,ited in the hands of Mr. Tetuplar. This was not all 7 *for even after. the . c6oveyant's were ey...<::tatetf they •were nk,,t to be'del4Cred the parties entitled to, them, but were,' in lik;thataiter,:tO. remain Mr. Templar's hands-and tiii* when !--Till after the meeting of next Parliament f.' such cir cumstances as these - , the Plaintiff had grit horn the Defendant his Wholeestate; 'without pay-ing him tiny Consideration' for it, the Court would not have in terfered to recover for the Pefendant - in - :price Of `his' property; neither, on the other hand, yould•it interfere to procure to the Pl'itintiff the 'est'Ate, if he could nOl'otherwise compel the Defendant to make good bas agreement. His Lordship should look : into the answer,---and-meotion to-niorroW if he saw ,any - thing in, it to nAke -him change his opinion ; but his impression, arising from the Plaintiff's letter, was so 'strung, that he, fe'lt the most decided convic tion, at ibis Moment, that this Was not a caserbr the equitable inted . erence of the Court. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DEC. g. BEDSON V. BENNET. Mr. Serjeant COCKEI-1, stated, 'that this was an anion against the owner of the • South' Sea Whale Ship, the . Favourite,.by the Plaintiff, who had been Second Mate of that vessel, for the balance of prize money due to him. • The Favourite Was a Letter of Marque as. Well as a Trader and in the passage out had, after a warm engagement, taken a valuable prize, - sailing under Dutch colours. — The prize, called the Juliana- Afaria, was §u leaky that the Favourite, instead of prosecuting her' voyage to the South 'Seas, returned home with the eaptured vessel. The Defendant, according to the statement of the Counsel; had represented to the men, that the prize, after the expences of condeMnation, would 'amount to . little. He afrerwards, - however,, seemed to adinit tbdt the clear moceeds amounted to 25,0601. and with the assistance of his Agent; had ..settled with the Plaintiff; and he believed others, at that .rate. The Plaintiff had a .50th share, it being the custom in this trade to give shares instead of wages, and accordingly received 5001. in• full of his demands. The fad, however, was, - that the produce, after the paymont .of . 211 expences, amounted to 41,8721. The both part °ldle additional 16,8721. was now claimed by the Plaintiff.- '['he Learned Serjeantob served, that though our sailors were .the.• noblest fellows in the world at sea, they were on shore the greatest lubbers imaginable, and suffered themselves to be bitten by • the Land •.Sharks, in spite of -all the. provisions made by the Legislature for their pro tection. Calder, the First Mate of the vessel, swore to the capture of the prize, and her arrival at Falmouth .in February, 1803, and the proceeds were proved to have amounted to 41,8721. by an answer of the De fendant to-a bill filed againsthim in another suit re speCtrng the same prize. ' Mt: Serjeant SHEPHERD ) for the Defendant, stated that the Plaintiff had. signed a receipt in full of all demands, and accepted of 5001. as his share, rather than wait the. issue of. the cause in the . Adm iralty Court. --His Client had run a considerable risk, for lie tnight.have got less than 25,0001. or-he might hate got nothing at. ail--=-taut in the event of the ship an cargo having been released,.he :would have-had large costs to pay.—The. Plaintiff had got his 5001. absolutely,• sad. the Defendant could never have got • I,,UN DOI; Printed by RICHARD n•RR 13, Of No. A, all ett-cou rt , Bow- street; and published by W x L.Lx iszAit eit.iP,e,a,:south,Motorbitscqt..Qiiisvenor-squaf.;; At the 05.(N-Okrcri,Ne. llt trand Adver Nsements, Orders tQi: the finer, [filers IQr thy Zdityr, stc , (tost-paicti Wit be a(Wressttd. Inc Stock, LL --. p r. vo" %—• tffit.s.vs• auniiii , t, citi• 64 r. iinveriAl 3 PI Cent. Dot° .suol. 7 66V Oins: Yoe Open in 2_ , HIGH W - ATER AT LONDON 1312111C11 T" ROW. afi ,r Morning, 27 min.. after 7. glterncon, 0 . n.MONDAY. , 2. 1 4 .‘ Morning, „;z min. after S. I Afternoon, a. farthing .of it back again, though - the prize had been released. The agreeMent therefOre fair and -conclusive, and the Plahniff .had ttO :further • Mr. Moses, who stated himself to be the. Agent for about 80 sail of South Sea Whalers, proved the signature of the receipt; and denied that Mr. Bennet , had said any -thing to hun about the rate at Wthich the 5001 were.ealculated. In this, however, he.,was cent raditled by Calder;-tv hi) swore that he had Men tioned the rate to be 25,00C1." 'The PayMent was made in February, 1804, Mr Serjeant COCKELL, in his reply, made some very strong remarks .ou „the condua of the De fendant and his' coadjutor; Master 'Mose , „ There ,was no risk in ihetase, for it apikared in - the ansWer : from the Defendant ' s own .roo'utii, that before,the Plaintiff had been . inveigled into, the s i gnature of "this receipt by the Defendant, and 'his pout Fr - eild !Master Mises, 350001. at least had been absdlutOy condemned in the Aclrph - 41tyJCOurt. • .The-. receipt itself said nothing about the payment, as being a compromiSe‘ for risk, "and; On the whole, he o.b -serted; that in his . Judgment, a fouler transaetion had. , never appeared in a.Court of Justice. It was a scandalous attempt to cheat ,The poor and worthy fellOws, who, while the Defendant himself was -rolling in Ihe'ltixtiiies of Blackheath, had, by their, hard labour :and at the risk of We - and limb,-procur ed for him this accession of fortune.-- j Sir S. MANSFIELD, in a clear and. ilistina man ner, summed up the case after which the JtitYliki mediately,,returned a verdi&for the Plaintiff, 'for _the fiftieth share of t 4, ,add4ional. 16,6741.-,being about' 3371. •• • • C6 1 11 1 10' 5 7C0 L A l l(f. M vac. cßimteszSlNt2.:ll-iNtgys. This was anla6lion; of Critm-Gett.-aridit Jury was assembled before-. Mr. -Col, crgliq til6'S?condary, _to aeso the 'damagesilie.:DlffendiltAuhaving•-suf-: fe.reditidgment i. by default. was not one of those fashionable cases ,that grace the,,matrituonial infidelities'Of polished life; tliongh - eqoally pregOnft with higratitUde and falsehood. -Tile , Detendant-is a baker ji ip the•liilrough, and the PlaintM'a ship"- wright; and foretuan to the Duch-yard, at Black wall. - TlieY were, besidek, friends and ' l a&itiaintatees . .-= -The Plaintiff-also resided 'in 'the Borough;'aride4i4s accustomed ,to,relurn home : evetT .Weduesdayiafici!' Saturday. Some fam.iliJritieshad been observe , d. by 'the Itiellds'of the partieS,'"a4 . pdssing betireen't'he Defendant and Mrs. Woods, which came -to' die !' Ithowledge-of the Deferidan c es;-yt:ile, 7 :who w;aS great ly enraged at her husbanci's neglect and . iniprudence. *She.irrituediately acquainted the Pla'intiff with w!iat :1 'she had heard, --but he,- "Tood'easy man," coin „not be persuaded of ,his . yiite!Onfidelity, and attri buted the_ fears of Mrs. Mai hews. to a wisplaced jealousy. 6ne MoiiThy, Vo\Vever,'livitig his work at an early hour, fie. resultikitilin t i.Mtiling to • town ; bat on.reaching home 4etweetilen andelev'en at night, he was surprised, atfilichilglts house close ly- locked up, and his in bcd He ealled'to the watchman, and with his -as-si'stance 'orened - h back window, through which he and thei guardian of the night entered. On gQing.into his bed-chant her, he di . scciver'ed hiA wife and the blik.er fast asleep 'in the - same bed. The husband wasipetrifie'cl , 'With astonishment, and. the watchman, alarmed for the consequences, Sprung his rattle. The affrighted lovers awaked from their trance, and; leaping front the bed, flecrout of the rootu, naked as they were. The neighhours assembled, who .interposing • be:- tweenthe much-injured. Ihtinv,r . w,ht,and,his dister4,- pered rage, saved both his wile...and the baker from .tins violence. He had his remedy, at latiy, •they, i kaid, and 'British 'Juries were liberal.,, This appeased the' perturbation of his mind, and the . hopes_ 9f. redress compensated, for the morneat,' the thought of lost., horihur and connubial liappiness.-, The baket: was, - permitted to retain home ; but how be fared with his suspaling wife did not appear. • • Mr. E4IN ASSE made apathetic appeal to the Jury, and emphatfcally remarked, that the 'poor' man's! best comfort vas his 116the. - :The 'Defendant, how -ever, had robbed' him of that, his only "solace,. and had made him an objet ,for "thin finer "Of "scorn point at. . . - One of the Witnesses exaMined on the part of the Plaintiff stated, that a friend had interposed' betW . een the partieS, and pi oposed, 'on behalf Of the Defend " ant,'to . giVe the Plaintiff 301 . ; zinci to drop, an .. a6tion. he bad commenced againSi tiirn for money lent, which 'amounted to no inconsiderable sum. • • Me. - Ccio.voon.wai about to address . the Jury for the Defendant, witch the SecondaVobserved, that the offer made. was prdbably•the!fit nleasbreof da mages, and recommended the Plaintiff to 'consider of it., The debt-due from the - Plaintiff to tile-De fendant, it was said, was upWaids of 2001. - • A conversation then t00k ,, -place: between the. friends of the con.teritlitigliatties, tind'a veldiet 301. NA as taken, the Defentlina ttrecitr: to di - op his • anion for the•debt due to him. •• • • ROLL'S' COUR I , DUJILIN, Dtc:s. F. E. JO NILS, ESQ.: V. 1)01' LE. This case came on before the MAsTim of. the ROLLS, on'a motion for 'an . injurirtion to stay the Defendant hunt levyi - tic 'the atuooto. of an execution tor 1001.-aolinst the Mr. GooLD,' for - Plalntiti, stated that he Patentee - - of the Theatre-lloyld in, 1/A.lin-4h:a having occasion to borrow a uni of 3000l„lie ap • prised the public that he - wo!ald borrow it in shares of 1 001. each, payable. by his bond, ,w1;11 five pd . cent. interest, and -accompanied widi a transfer.- ble ticketuf admission, which usually sold fig is guineas atm - wily-L-0m( Mr„Joir:s.liv - ing been lately .put to great expellee by bringing over Madame Catalani and a number of foreigners, he refused ad mittance, fottheir nights, to eaCh Of those tickets so given for lending money. That the Defendant. be} tog one of -those persons refused, gave noti-ee,put suant to fli - e tertris.of the bond, that he would,levy the. amount, and accordingly issued' an execution against Mr. Jones. Mr. Goold insisted; that this was an usurious contract, inasmuch as the ticket' being worth 15 guineas,_and the bond being payable . with 5 per cent. interest, the Plaintiff would thereby have per cent. for hiS 'money . . The Defendant, by his answer, .admitted the fad, and therefore there W as at least a.question ter the hearing. • • The 501 .1CITOR-GENEVAL was Shout to reo 1° Mr..Gcs4d;• when The MASTER of the ROLLS said, he new not trouble himself, as he wa s ' ca ll e d on • here to decid e ° whether this w as , a usurious contra:l? If he was t f dire& any aceeinct, it must be of what the value °,t Madame Catiloties note; were. In that itecotio t would be impossibl e f or t h e M aster to j u dge an; less Madame Cat a l a ni cou ld b e p reva il e d upon ► ~ come • over and sing the notes over again ber°' c Masters Henn ands King, th e oly Masters cal' 3 ' l_,l3 : , of judging,, -they - being • the only musical antateut belonging to the Court, and as that was not 1.) 1 ° . babte, he must refuse the motion. Mr. GoOLb, in answer, alledged, that his 1 - 191 1 °' - ',, f treated.Mr: Jones's property as if it were vox . , Tl)e. CouRT answered, if a lender of Money en," deac.oured to Manage, so as to ev a d e the statute, , would :be the of the Court to hunt •tbe wr ol 4' .doer through : his : dis gu i ses , f or t h e purpose o f P' i ` r. _vent - ton but it must be a clear casc--tor irOao ce ' a man,' borrowing ni9ney, takes goods frOm . 3 i ner ; chant at ton pilce;,' tor fdrilearance, t 'usury ;• but that, ins •.,no t Jike Ore: pigeeni case. au ,tn:au lepdin mono o;,t he..,ahaversj,e.c c fti a poor relatio n of h is , and entitfecitg 'the Honour " =6 the side-table ;• he; tiid 'WIN; ittlrig f=atls •of Ifft obivA•rtriiif i he dracriactft(initbklitighesi;plinP l 4l": oo seroalwgi 441 - !t, ake;grewweiglitio - , u ne su a r re ic r u s .ihe fit iii stag l e o . ht • . hig lene ]ool, to -Mr. Fo o t, an d he receive 0 4199c ; ,k ) .149010T that . atpeuhr, comitig,eut?P'r, i ,shop,got: a sneeze o f the snuif through his‘gr ll , l ,:'!'[ i lie w here it was Cl !. ditOtiAqli4-tuyse, tirstcthilis tvoord-be n,ea's'e of , .6 o6 t at j` 7+.1.t 0 , 44 - nitos si he .could shut hi* (lyes`.4o7. what he ,Lnew to bethe custom in ,this ca!e. . I;.• • • . sons adthitted - ix , ffe . necessary , appendages the 'Manager, and necessary stalling for a kl4ioe ; Unless they weresgadiniftvd ) had; ali4g _would 6 without any applause. . • _ • , • . • " iviallou refused with c osts. l , r•; c - PLO LIG H I A-6 1 T i • :, 1 (1• 1 3). I,l3tkt Noyemher a plou g hi ng m a tc h took P1. 1 ' 7 1J • at inroch, in the ' StOrtnont distriCt of Pertlisbl i r ar e ' !field befitting to Mr. Seutt,'"or-B a lcairii, 7 lpreApiurns glyAtt.,by the .Highland Society. , or .Twenty-seven candidates appeared, and toe yeas c. in general pe.rforthed in so'excelfe n t a nig n ` , , that the:itidges had' Cf>itsielerable difficulty in or l ' • "the .comparative merits of the cslici' ,iates d - ,01 .mnyll deliberation, th e P r i zes were iii*.tri&JcillOi;ving order : ; c o ati' servatit to'Mr. Ciituthßell,o• 2,, lames trong,, sel - .ant to mt. Constable. „ If r 4 - 3 • . ar.r.!s Saunders, se r v ant to the Ps . Mr. plays' :lister of Pondochy s. .. kobert kOoertson, servant to Colonel Mgithersoo• ,erii-ant to Mr. Scott, of lialcaviei- M'Larcp; servant to Mr. Geor t i, 7. Pa Nterocrvant to Mr. j. Clark (;•-lhe•r;s -8.461- Muir,.scrvant to CilrOth lien, of Coutf:., l ie• g. M - Uougal, .servant to the Rev.. Mr. M'K''' • i'.1:;: , ...tc-tot (.; eorge• M servant to Mr.,Constable • I_ 11. iJitn Nl' Larcr., ;:ervant to Mr. M'Laren, Wesier Mr. Scott entertained tle Car4g.ttes with bread an,lo` - ale; arid a The meeting was attended by Sir A..1\1. of L4nzie, cif Delyine i Bar t... Colonel I:1' i'l i coL' Al 'oc llilqirgowrie, John 241,11-rs.', LititrOfq' t , of ReV. tilird . ,:Pritteip;t. 45f` Czfi 4 t*i'cit..ll;'Elui. r • ik NITI i;;ntion,.Esq.; of; ;Parkhill, find' a! twasit )e -," of olher Gentlemen, a!1 •by an ;, , i) men se c eotic . W.:trZi l er the neightioOring and the thisiness of the day •Avtag-tf;liclitded; the Gt . : l • . eil t :igen assembled dined together,at,Kiniobit,aicis? the evening much to their 0 - ratification. ; ."1 DlStbi/ NT ALLOWED OU LT OTif; Y A 5, .F.Frery, Purchaser of Shares of Tiaets,:*aninolitiirtl.4, Five Poundsand upwards,will b e a ll owe d a 1ii!' , 0, 11 46 at J. Ett's Fortunate OtEce, Ci, Capital Prizes to - a late a mou nt h ave b ee n ro:v. l ' eli sold in Shares.—The Lottery begins draw,iiig. 30 , Tuesday, with superi or . a d vantages to an,' r`yn Scheme, viz. Two new Prizes of .500 TiCkel' besides Four of *20,0001. T wo of t 0,0001- 'l\ 5(100!. 5.M.45t:." . . . - -----___ .., . BIRTHS. ___- - . O r i titc. This morning, Mrs. Whitefoorti, wife of ,' 1) foord, .Esti. of Grbat A rgyll•street, ofa San. Cafeliti‘ Yesterday morning, in .Stratford-dace, .I. , ' J • l' •Wrottesley, ofa Daughter. - • o f v a ns4 l The same day, at (.3hampion.hill, the LadY `Willink, Esq. of Ainstidani, of a Son. • IL/IR R IE4). "On the Stir f. ins at St. Peter-Iv-Poor, itroad..<tr", - '„ :!-C,corge Contact Stoli.:l, of..lie:mondscy, to m, s s Frederica Triebner, slaughter of the Itcy. C. F. Tric iNl4 ' Old LicoAl.strett. ' ' 1 ., Of: On . tho 27th o.oelober ft at St, Mary, A kiermmit" L ' ' 'A. l'ilerinVrakon, igorthainptonshire, ro 11t [cav e Cattell,.,:uicond•ciaughter of the late Mr. GeOrgc " t • 1) A f.,•41 iv•*E.iign., Betley, in M r. Staffordshire, Mainwaring, to Mi6s lane Oats. • , . f - - . . . •.' UIED. . . ll: ' On the 3oth rtf August I,asr, at Dominica, in flee-391 i;" of hts axe, l'..ittif Laing, EA.' • Ading I) r.Vvst. IVlarsn..l c"ii; Island, and, (; a Captain Gt the Roy ,I 1 St. (~,04;" -'‘IIZIII'",;( On the'zd inst. at rove.l-1,m..r, near Knutstorti, i. if lingering illness, Mrs. AritrQbua, widow of lobo /11101/ 1.,,r; of that 'place. . Or 4/ 7:"1t Wc(incaS• last', after a I-ng and iy,inftti iilnesS• jar -e BaNin, vv.!c or Mr. is.:ac Bailin, Niel,..nant 4 1 .tht Ilitirday..last, at liright,n, Inc icnattt son of.- # "I'l ,r: to,,,•Esti. liic:lciAtit )earl. ~ .ir Yesterday. Ino.rning, at Nluswell hill,'. Mrs. N01f.',7',,,i' of Thomas N,tris, Lsq. a4ed 63 years, after a iIMA "" , • Lately,' in•Piti:eney . street,- Bath, .ISlis. ()rntso. .1, O'`" On Monday se',titn'Aitt,. at the ,Shake,peare I ava", ' „:01d ming ham, 'lat ,vincit tic tract been master .n the Lot Mr. .Lnarie§ "A'ilday. ... - --7" - • . . PR 01;' SIOL'KS IiSTIRDAY, Bank Stock, Navy slier Cent shut 4 pet Ceut. Si ) per Cent. 10-A.- 3 per Cent, Con. sin:it Bank L, Ann. 18 17 is-1601s