The Sun. — London, England, 1810-04-11 00:00:00

the :on- IIeSS P.ir- t on ; . . itlls - )cell arge' by Liave that raj ands' ,ntly. ould of con °use s at— oud lities !any pled, ys tO 11 Of 1131). s tur litOt airy NO; .003." ~;~►~~ !: Ilf 9 :thic 4 \Nil* iat it iliates asio- the' s pot.' war' ;, W IC Coll' 7 1 1 ° poisit to da riven soina usts Ige la tell° 11 Sir land- t like d to Jughe I the imae" meta: ;0 for: thog which. that.. PALMER too - klin opportunity, of disclaitning in the few words which he had offered , ' say ing any thing.offensive to the - ' 1 '!(1 Gentlemen opposite to him, (Sir S. Rei , . • PoRCHESTER declared, that language could f ' it s P atfuet terms top str o ng in :whiCh to reprobate,- b r ow begi nn i ng to en d, the.eondua of Sir .Francis "Drdett, •Though he could not, with his Hon. fri • eucl behind liiin,, rally round a GovernMent to ose ins - lability 'lie attributed the evils which ' ad receotly occurred, yet he.was . t uoSt wilti ng , and he trusted all who heard him would be most WU • . 41 %, '0 rally round the Constitution, and round 'r , vae , 4 , :s of !hat House. The Noble Lord pro a- view •ol: the conduit of Ministers t a . th e l ate events, end while: he allowed th a t th e • , i. P l!s whi c h h a d ucccured were ch i efly imputable to s`ge ttuation of. the individual wh os e l e t ter was tir 6 illect or the preseq motion, contended that eY were in . a great measure to be ascribed t o t he b a 'vritig grid vactilating-- measures .of his Majesty's ov erninent. Of . the two motions before the House; riopose that ot the Chancellor of the 1 0 " c- 1un', t ho.agle it .might -perhaps be worth while c . 4 criflce the word " aggravated" for the purpose Obtaining all unanimous vote. -a qr. Sa•taolitee thought.'his Majesty' s Mi n i s t ers 0 4 t'cliv dealt by, when the Honourable Gentlemen 4 1 : 1155 Ito. instead o f : c oin i ng fOrward with a di re ct til ' ul '° ll 'of censure (which he was sere would be mil:vetted : ink() a vote of approbation), attacked ttl ota a eeestien - tO which their observations did h t t , apply, andaf a petiod'.when the public mind re 17,1aed.taucii agitated. He could not rec o n ci l e . to t nirld by what mode of argument two of - the °o• Gentlemen opposite had- arrived at the con tiNi°"...that- the amendment proposed by his Right ~( 4 1. Fri en d ought to have been rejected. They I 'd that they 11,IJ dissented froth the declaration ii *l e by the House that the letter of Sir Francis t.hdeft to his Constituents was a violation-Of their p tlv ileges, and therefore th a t t hey y could not call the ' t ttj l ia l klett, of the 1:1011. Baronet: aggravated; since they consider that he had been before - guilty . - of 4 4 0 ifence. 'He was very sorry to find thit two e „ g : re-loe&able Members went the whole length o f tt e il t derlog that 'the pamphlet of the Hon. - Baronet t . ll hilt deserve eve n c e n s ure. the - recent ts i o ij he -had 'thieerstood it hose Hon. Gentlemen c ontend th a t i t w a s no t a libel ; but be had also ‘* t e „ zutiu Wean to adMit that it was highly disre ,4ful t o t h e H ouse . T a ki ng i t , h owever, on the i r t ak _ ll ground that the pamphlet of t h e H onoura bl e ar 'oriet did out -deserve censure, if the letter ad the3sed Jo the Speaker were not an aggravation of 1 4 ; () fret ICe, it was an original oft.:ence and Ai high eti ce. But the Hon. Gentleman wished to dis . ar without record: if any one should future period .move. for the discharge ‘of • the 'tr. Baronet; the Hon. Gentlemen opposite, if . * e l ! succeed,-.1 in preventing the record of condo& toto ielt they-allowed was highly culpable, would be. 0„ Penekl" to vote :for hi'. discharge.- There was - 141 -1 2 thing which he trusted would go forth to the on ,which he *congratulated the 'Honse p th e C oun t r y. si It was, that she report that Sir • La',.'ch. Burdett had been advised t o 'do than which tfihad done by any .Member' - of that House was Clly t c, unfounded. wars an aspersion on the razi er ot the House. Not a Member-had spoke - e bnai ltati • riot reprobated in -the strongest ternis.the ' 411, 1 of Sir Francis'Burdett, and therefore it was but t • h, 0 be s e p ee s e d th a t i n iesisting the authority of . 0 7 blouse, the Hon; Baronet had a single adviser t i o kivocat e within those walls. In his apPrehee y„, a the whole accusation of 'his M ;jesty's Ministers ecl on a f ‘llacy, on the blending and confOsing distinct things—general resistance by force o:Pposing the Speaker's Warraht; and claiming b .', Protection -which a pri vate House afforded rnit -a civil .process.' It seemed to be assoin6d: i H...n..Gentlemen opposite that a warrant out wo.:ld not -authorise the breaking. open_ of e:er dews was s alrciless. Such, - however, were all P"vessei for contempts in Courts of Law.— s ei e ,re Courts 'of La* to be contemptuously - treated y e 1 1l imvunity, iwecause " thyr processes 'would not 4s(11 th e o ff en d er w i t hi n his doors ? If, thedis kilsji"rl upon -the motion ter committing Sir Francis C l uelt to the Tower, it had been urged that the i o li Picer s s-Marraet would not authorise the break denrs, still he stiould have recommended ll be issued. It' would have kept the. offender it ' t ills house, or it would. have made him abscond ; or e i.) lC h•cl been seed abroad rt might have been served 4; 3 , 4 Would- I hiS.have been degrading to the i),,,,"°rity of the House ? Tile Learned 'Gentleman tt rsite had asserted, that the possibility of other l i ; ls tanee to ti.e'executio4 of the warrant might 11 :e beeii antieipated, and therefore that it ought to have been issued. It such a doctrine as this er e ado iitked—if any motives of intimidation were tio u wed to influence the House, teere would be an i c ,"! l at On c e o f a ll th e p r i v il eges o f P ar li ament . Ac 14":tiag to . tO &aline ; 'the House would issue e u : Process against the meek, who would not op \tis' it, bet they vioilld :not issue it' against those. At i .. ° Would"setup their faces in opposition to it. ~00h' hirn the argument of the Learned Gentleman t,, r mid have been an additional reason for voting commitment' of Sir Francis Furdett. The, 11 1 , -tr aori howeter, having been issued, Govern -4 ' 4l t were charged with 'having neglected to make . Provision on the OCCaStiOll. There 'again two dis-, 1 ,41 things wereco'nfounded—a proviston so keep t t 7 l . and - a provision to enforce the exe -11,140 ot the 'warrant.' Some Honourable Geu • ti i ,: 4 ll had compared the recent disturban c es t o e: 'lets. in 1780 If be had wanted a contrast to hich had lately happened, and to the condua si r h is Nlajesty's _Government, he should have re to"il to the riots of 1780. Great praise was due l 'i3 'l.l.ajesty''s Government that the recent out el, had been so s oo n suppressed—that tue force .' . 4) s ' pr es s th em h a d b een use d w i t h such-mo pr-stion -and forbeara nce , an d-th a t t h ou gh th e ini -6Lrti.l"l 'end oViestoring the-public tranquility-had tLet! obtained, it had been obtained in a way, Which t t the Rom -Gentleinan oppoSiie would not yen to call an- intern erate or unreasonable exercise 1, 4 , 11 4: 'il l itt,iry-T p -- furs It Was no more the duty ot t ) , Nl3 .,it - stv's Government to - dire& the Serjeaut ro , xeciite the Speaker's warrant, than it was duiy o f a Judge to iustrue.i a Sherif/210W to th:Ctite kis Warrai.t. It was to • the law atone th a t 5'4.3 oat' t was entitled -to-have recourse. • - If he a cted in opposition to-That law, and hi or any of his followers fell, there wouldbe.no redress ;.and if, -on ilaicontrary, any of those-who opposed him fell, he :would• be liable to an indiCtineet for murder.-ee .CoUld' any Gentleman seriously think thaethe opi nion of his Majesty's. Ministers would shield a Ser leant at Arms from punishment under such circum stances . -The Learned Gentleman -opposite; who considering the side of the House on which . he sat, sided a most Manly and honourable part, seemed to think it hard that the Serjeant had been left tochoose his own may (Amit - eh% the Speaker's warrant. It' was the same-thing however •as in Courts of Law for centeinpts; &c. In those Courts the right of breaking open doors under their warrrants had been repeatedly agitated. Adverting to the condua of the Serjeant at Arms, he coticurred entirely in the opinion of an Hon. Baroact upon it. It would be highly unjust to consider that Gentleman as very censurable: for the little irregularity which he had , • certainly in the first instance committed. It should be'redolletaled that lie had been accustomed to treat the MeMbert entrusted to his charge with delicacy, and that he confidently relied on-time solernn honour of Sir F. Burdett. The cenduel of •Ministers ap ',-Treared to him not only to, be undeserving of. repre 'fiefision but entitled 'to great praise. His Right Honoerable Friend had been taunted with a former expression of his that he "would sand by the King." Yes; his Right Hon. Friend would stand by the King, for .he would atand by the preetlegei of the House of Com Mons, which was to stand by the Constittitien, and to stand by the Constitution .was to stand by the King. • Lord 'Te'aiieis and Sir S. ROtetttet explained. Mr. C. WYNNit accused GOvernment of tardiness in not having ordered the Constables to •whip home the first mob of boys bet'ore they were joi ne d by more serious rioters. In his opinion the right. of executing the warrant of that House did not rest on . the narrow ground of analogy, but on the law 'and usage of Parliament. The House- in many cases . possessed a very extensive power. Mr. BERESFORIi declared, that .every subsequent event had convinced him more and more of the pro priety of the vote which he had given for committing Sir F. Burdett to the Tower. He was sure that his re cent conduct would open the eyes of - the country, and that they would perceive that it was his intention to create a civil war, and to effeil a revolution. He was persuaded, als e that if this Sariguinary Gentle man ivere expelled from the House, Ilse electors of Westminster would not send him back. Were it not tha' the general feeling of the House seemed to be against suet; a measure, he would himself move his expulsion. • Lord MILTON approved of neither of the propo aitiotra before the House. He was of opinion a dif ferent step ought to be taken ; but it was not for him' to say what that step should he. Had the House in the first instance stopped short of inflict-. ing - that ulterior punishment on the ant. Baronet, 'there would on the present occasion have been no difference of opinion; all would haveconeurred in the propriety of sending him to the Tower. But es it was, they having wasted their ammunition, could . do nothing more. Another objection arose from the expreSshm in the lii 4 fit Hon., Gentl e man's Resolution, that "• the House thought any farther proceeding now unnecessary."- From that phrase, it appeared as ii` the Right Hon. Gentleman wished to drop . the . subject for the present, that he might let- it off at sonic foture period. It any farther step were necessary, it ought to be immediately taken. The Su 'ject ought not to be renewed., Under all the circumstances, as he disapproved of both time propositions„, he A ould vote for neither. Mr. LYrrLstoN observed, that whatever might be the feelings of Gentlemen as to the letter of Sir Francis .to his Constituents, and time proceedings of that House thereon, he thought there could be but one opinion on his letter to the Speaker, namely, that it was highly•reprehensible. Whatever might be his oivn 'pri:ate feelings, hr , felt bound t o declare, that 'he could not justify one tittle of the Hon. Ba ronet's condu&. In continuing a useless contest for four days, he exposed the lives of many persons to no purpose. Mr. Fox had stated resistalice to be culpable_ when success was hopeless. He then cen sured his giving 'an implied consent to theSerjeant as being utterly. unworthy a man of honour. Ano ther circumstance, which in his opinion went very strongly against Sir Francis Burdett, wagehis-having been from first to last, since the decision of that House on his letter, in the company of the brother of a most notorious traitor. He did not mean to say that Mr. Roger O'Connor was a traitor; but bad he (Mr. Lyttleton) been in the situation of Sir Francis fitirdett, he would not h,ave.chosen for his bosom-friend the brother of that base traitor, Ar thur O'Connor, who.in foreign publications had li belled England with the most inveterate rancour.— Was it on the information gained from siach a source that the Hon. Baronet wished to inflame his coun trymen, and make the people rise against the Go vernment ? He censured the conduct of Sir Francis from the bottom of his heart. kiis letter to, his Constittents,waa.an offence against that House, and if he (Mr. Lyttleton) had wished the House not to proceed against the Hon. Baronet as they ih,:d d one on that account, it was,because he had some doubts as to the legality of such a procedure. He did not wholly approve of either of the propositions. The Chancellor of the Exchequer's, however, being the stronger of the two, should nave his 'hearty vote. Sir J. Finer. most heartily approved of the amend mem of the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Mr. HuTcniNSoN would be extremely sorry 'that [hat HOLISP should be-any thing but the ltePresen tatives of the People. He was originally against the committal _of Mr. Jones, and took the earliest opportunity of registering his sentiments by voting for his liberation ; but that committal having taken place, he-found the. Hon. Baronet liad condemned that proceedieg as unconstitutional, in as manner which he could not but disapprove, though he went • to the full length of his argument. He could not approve of the conduct of Ministers, in causing the Member for' Somerset to bring- forward the motion he made-[" They did not," front the Treasury Bench.] - - and having voted as he did ott the former motions, he could not vote for the amendment on this, for, reasons so much better expressed by his Hon. Friend below him. . Mt. CURWEN explained, ,that -he: had only pro posed to pass over the letter, from an idea that the HoOse would e best consult its -dignity by adopting such a line of cenduct. He regretted the eebate bad taken the course it had, as he had hoped to have kept that .most disgraceful letter from their Journals: Though" - not disposed to Compliment he approved of the- pr. cmitions they had Inken, am! did not knowiitai iie*V:Ould have aded diet - I...rent - 1y had the 'tesponiibdny heen• his. He thonghr the. Electors of West inmster 'would see in a proper light , the condnot of tlwir Representative:— Wishing as he unanimity, lie had no objec tion to withdrawing hig inOtionif such was the v, ish Of the House.... The moiton was about to be withdrawn, when Mr.. W► 'Tait EAD e.s pressed a wish that that ques tioq shodld be pif Mr. Goncx hid h::•en on a former evening in fa vour ilia reprimand, i :stead of the. 'commitment of Sir F. Burclelt ,to the Tower. He begged to recant his error. - The conduct of the Honourable Baronet had been such, that he only regretted that the're solution was not - strong enough to express the ab horrence he felt. Lord CocintASTE thought the subjea under dis cussion worthy of.their most - serious consideration, and the que.tion one ,into which no p ar ty f ee l ing should enter. 'He thought they were not warranted in commiuing Mr. Gale Jones, nor in breaking into the house of Sir Francis Burde«. The letter of the Hon. Baronet he thought contained some expressions which were unnecessary—he would go farther, they were improper; nay, he would go still farther, and admit they might be deserving of CenSure . ; but still be agreed with the Hopoursble Baronet in pima of arguinent. As "a libel could be . punished by a pro secAtiOn in a Court of Law,. that was the line of condul Which ought to • have been pursued. An offence -which, they could not thus punish, they Mightkive a right of ptinishing themselves; but in other cases they ought not to sit as judges in their own cause.. With submission, he begged to oh serve, that the Crown was not the judge of its own privileges; and he did not think that House was en titled to suet) au advantage over the Crown. He approved of the precautions taken by Government. Ministers would irideed have bLen culpable had they not at least taken such. He bad been informed that Sir F. Burdett's house was, entered by the mili tary,. two soldiers being the first who entered. That he thought was not the proper way of executing the law. He would vote for the adjournment, or any other measure which would fairly get rid of the. subjed. He thought their decision would riot ire;. fiuence the public mind. Mr. BATH URST censured the condna of the Noble ,Lord in coming forward at a time - when, it his argu ments were worthy of , notice, they could not be considered. It. a military force should appear to bare been used otherwise than they had been in formed by. the Serje4nt—if he should have given a mis-statement, he merited punishment. He had no obie&tion to the Chancellor of the Exchequer's Amendment which passed over the letter as written -in the heat of passion. A Noble Lord'had 'said they could base committed Sir Francis Burdett 'to the Tower had not the whole of their amtnuni.ion been previously expended, and that it was a imitier of regret, as they had thus left themselves without the looms of inflicting puni , sliment. If Sir Francis had not been commi:ted to the To ver, the legality of that warrant would not have been denied, and constvently thus reserving to therneivcs the power of sending him there, a, rt:, ulterior pub;shriteat, . would have been useless. On time principle of the 7 ,1 \ 19bk Lord, it might be contended, that) hey should never punish as fir .as lay in tht-ir petver, because, doing so, should a, new 'offence, be committed, it would not - be in their po we. to, add to the punish.- ment of the offender. He condenined the cuttdua of Sir Francis, and appauded Ministers. Sir CHARLFS Buitaat. vindicated the condut of the military as most exemplary in their forbearance under the infamous insults of a r as c a lly mo b, amongst whom, he was proud to say, a Single de cent individual was not to be seen. Some were as sassinsi, who had, even hi the vicinity,of that House,. on last night, fired at an Officer of the Guards, through whose hat the ball bad aelually passed. He reprobated the conduit of the Hon. Baronet frorn first •to last, and declared that he wouLd have. sur rendered himself even to he put in irutis, rather than be the cause of one drop of blood being shed, Mr. WILBERFORCE was still impressed with the "propriety Cif - the course he pursued - on the former, occasion in voting for the reprimand. He believed it would. have made a much ditlerent impression upon the ponourable Baronet than was made by the committal to the Tower. Ile had seen an ele vated chaiatter approach to that. Bar in order to be reprimanded with great apparent l e vi t y, but h e soon saw hirn so humbled by the commanding and im pressive censure of the Chair, that he departed low ered,depresscd, and pennent. lie did think that the Amendment '3i the Chancellor of the Exche quer could be so modified, as to remove the objec lions. whirl: were entertained to the term " aggra vation." Mr. BOYLE defended Minister's from the asper sion of their opponents. l,t was most mischievous, in his opinion, to attribute a:I the calamities, as they were called, of the late riotous proctedings, to their mist:km(lol, tither than to the jacobinical spirit, which had so recently manifested- itself. Thc'question was loudly called for, and strangeri were excluded. Atter strangers bad lxen excluded from the Gallery, the question of adjournment was not press ed to a divish.m. Before we were re-admitted, Mr. Perceval had proposed his Resolution of Censure upon the Letter of Sir Francis Burdett to the Speaker ot the House - of Commons, which stated the said . Letter tb be an aggravation of the former offence eorntnitted by the Hon. Baron , l. Mr.-- Perceval added, if he could thereby insure unanimity,, he would withdraw the words of reference to . for mer proceedings. To which we understand Mr, Whitbread .to have ,said, that he could not agree to .the Resolution with those words.; because, having contended that no offence . had been com mitted by the Letter and Argument laid, upon the the-table by the Member for Sornersetshi:e, he could not say that had been aggravated, which, in his Opinion, had Dover existed. He was ready to ad -nut, that the Letter to the Spr'aker was a high breach of the privileges ot the House. Whatever doubt might be' entertained of the legality-of the cornmitmeat ot Gale Jones; or of the warrant against - Sir Francis Burdett, or of the expediency of resorting to either of - those measures, there could be no (loot); that this was a case in which the House was aggrieved, and where redress - could not ~ be sought, elsewliere'; the House must, of neces cessity, take cognizance of it, Oen. It had bi-cn OtiiMed to him and others, in the cOui;e of Abe _- night's debate, .1 hat they had grown contit:ent re. specking the mode of executing the wair a t, froth . their knowledge of the event ; to this he would an -swer for one, he had expressed his opinion upon the force of the 'S;eaker's Warrant, If issued, upon. proper groundS, in a coniersat;on he had held with the Serjeant at Arms, whom he accidentally met, before that Officer had ever been at the House of Sir Francis Burdett at all. Upon the question having been then propostd - to.- him, how he would at in such a case 1 He had said he would immediately wait neon Sir Francis Burdett, and ask him how he intended t o conduet himseil ? If he intended to go voluntarily, that the utmost Courtesy as to the mode.shonld be used. If be wish `f ed for a nominal force, for the purpose of establish. tag his principle and maintaining his aaion, it might be instantly applied Without diffictilty or mOlesta tion; if he would not yield except to eau tl force, the Serjeant should' forthwith sodden such a foice as . would overpower him, and render resistance hope less. The honourof Sir Francis Burdett had mis led the Serjeant into a supposition,- that he would accompany him .to the Tower the next morning; nor was the Serjeant to blame for having so con ceived of the intentions o f Sir Francis Burdett ; but it was too much to say that Sir Francis /3 !rdett had `broke his word with the Serjeant - ...'Upon the whole, Mr. Whitbread said, he was willing to adopt any 1 . Parliamentary phrase, however strong, to cheratc-. terize the letter addressed to,the Speaker, provided no-term of reference to any former proceeding was inserted; for the letter itself he thought exceedingly ill composed, and highly offensive. The SOLICITOR. GENERAL for Scotland was de. sirons of retaining the original words. Mr. WHITBREAD could Din - consent - to the sword "aggravation," and proposed " ilagrant" as a parlia mentary word, and at the same time a word suffi ciently strong ; - and that the expression should be, " t 1 'grant breach of the privileges of the House." Mr. TIERNEY wished for •an unanimous decision, which he taought might be obtained .if the Ca ti cellor of the Exchequer would- make interest with the Solicitor-General for Scotland- to give. up the word " aggravation." . Mr. WILBERFOLICE thought the mode ilopo3ed by the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Whitbread) would be a more marked expression of the sense of the House than the'reoining of the.words of reference pro posed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer. -Mr. ( . ..).waN was. of the same opinion. Mr. ADAM also expressed a similar opinion. Mr. GILu thought the House shbuld pass a substantive condemnation of the letter without the words of reference. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL fur SCOTLAND dis claimed any wiAt pertinaciously 'to itniist upon his opinion. • The CHANCELLOR of -the 'EXCHEQUER mia4 ex- etrem:dy desirous of unanimity upon. this occasion, and wished therefore to adOpt the suggestion of the Honourable Gentleman (Mr: Whitbread). Li 'or— . loweVer, Lim( it mi l ;ht not appear on the Jo ur tials that ttic original words relative to igvavation had,beeti left ow, he J. eipiested he' mi g h t b e a !l owe d to propose the w o rd suggested by the Honourable Getillenlafri (4r. Whitbread), is a part of the origi nal motion. . Mr. WHITBREAD conSented. • The SPEAKBR . requested ;to be informed of the wish of the Hou.ie, as to whether the 'Letter of Ssr Francis Bordett should be entered upon the •Jouri nals, obser►~ing that there were precedents both ways, and that it was 'entirely optional with the House. . . It appearing to be the general sentiment, that the L.:.tter should not be inserted on the J.iur nals,- the Speaker said he would give directions ac. • cordingly. _ , _ - .. • It being also understood that the Amendments moved should appear on the Journals, the Speaker said he would give directions accordingly, and the question was put as an original motion. • " That the said letter is a high and flagrant breach of the Privileges of this House, but 'it appearing by the . Report of the Serjeint, that the Warrant for tilt-. committal-of. Sir-Fiancis Burdett to the Tower has been executed, this House does not think it necessary to proceed further in the business." • This motion *as agreed to nemine contradicente. EXCHEQUER BILLS. Mr. WHITBREAD 5a1..., that a statement bad been .handed to him, from which it appeared, that on the day appointed for holders of Exchequer Bills to at tend at the ExcheqUer Bill Office,, for the purpose of delivering them to be funded,. persons were ad• witted by it private door . before the public door was Opened,. and that great partiality was•shewo in it - 14dt% up the list. He therelOre thought an in quiry was necessary. • TheCHANCEI.LOR of the EXCHEQUER was con 'vinced it would be found, that there was no foun dation for the statement which had been handed to the Hon. Gentleman. He agreed, however, in the necessity of inquiry, and moved for the- appointthent of a Seled Corhinittee for that purvose, which WAS agreed to. The other Orders of the tray were disposed of, and the House adjourned at halt past One o'clock. From the LUNDQN GAZETTE, April 10, iBl Q BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED. !obit Lyon, of North-place, Gray's-ton lane, Middieeer money-scrivencr, from March 13 to May t, at ten, at Guildhall. . BANICAUPTS. Augustine Fallon, of Hart-street, 13loomsbury, Middlesex, wine -merchant, to surrender April 17, at eleven, 21, at ten, and May 22,' at eleven, at Guildhall. Attornies, i'.4easrs. Chapman and Stevens, St. Mildred's-court, Poultry. Samuel Lcking Mellor, late of Liverpool, cotton-dealer, May t, 2, and 22, at one, at the Star and Garter Tao vern, Liverpool. Attorney, Mr. A vison, Hanover.. street, Liverpool. lames Yorrest, of Cheater, cotton-dealer, May t, 2, and 22, at eleven, at the Star and Garter Tavern, Liverpool. At. torney, Avisnn, Hanover-street, Liverpool. rtoert Mayhew, kite (..:t Sutton, SutiOlk, miller, April 25 . 26, and May as, at eleven, at the Coach and Horses, 1 pm kir. A ttornies, Mr. Rceve tsirnn, Ipswich ; or Mr. Saaiuel Taylor, Suntharryton.buildings, Lhaticery-lane, London. form Tliornas Serres, late of Queen-street, Golden-square, pie ure tratne-ccaler ; April t 7, 21, and May ciety tact' theY d.s• his Ito g) ill nett ,lac' Div.? ?'~~' piug • the pear ding I.eatte {ur 1: Bur- Cul . a per.- •