The Sun. — London, England, 1810-04-14 00:00:00

spnmible by. tlern. The principle was in itself enough, It had long been the practice to ask for st - ,,711 so:hrities. He had already 'stated that Mr. Ridge had ; been ordered to find such securities, and th,it ther bond had been prepared but never executed !,), him, ihough it was by the other persons who .wire to be concerned in it. .The 'Hon. Gentleman had stated that it had always been the practice to give • new. securities under each' new Master. He did not that"to he the fad, he dill not believe it to bes 6. The bonds - were given, no , . to the Master of the 0 nat e,,hin to the_King,„and they continued in force a long as the same agent was continuo ,in (*lo g , . Gentiemo seemed-to thitilrbe wistlel to charge hiM with negled unjustly. Hey had no Intention of doing; so. He still maintained 'ha, it was not the date *of t he Clerk of the Ordnance to taket te`securities,..but he had a right toshew who. s "enVed to say liis.(Mr. alt•raft's) condutt had been sy. much .bet ter than - hiS(Mr.:CooPer's), that he also (Mr. ,ilcriift) had 'been guilty of an omis sion as well as liiintelf. As he wished to meet • socit cases he would mention' another, that of Mr.. ,whO waS placed in a sit&atiOii of trust to the ainottni of 163;0001. annually,' yet from whom no t s,,curities were taken. If, such an omis sion merited censure on the part of the Clerk of ,the Orauance, the Hon. Gentleman was as cul pable himsell. He, howey6r, did not charge hint with - any • neJeCt, as that was not within t he_ pro vince of the Clerk of the, Ordnairce: He bad no ~obje6.tion :to the motion. - Mr. CALCR AFT - wished for the -prodnetion of those parts of the instrutious drawn up in the time of Charles the Second, which the Hon..,Genileman thou ht bore him out in what he had stated. ,The Hon. Gentle Man drew back 'since the' .night before Oo further . inquiry.he had found the case would not suit his purpose. It was not till there was astir 1 about. Hunt 4 hat Mr. Ridge's securities were thought ,vould bring Mr. Ridge to the Bar of that HOOse and prove what he had advanced.' He would have Aye or No on the subject The case of HOp kinson, had been brought fortvarfl, Give hitn . a day to look into it, al4he had no doubt but he should be able to give a satisfaaory explana tion. He - wished those opposite to bring .forward all the charges they could against himself and those • with whom he had a6ted. If they could not defend • their aaioos, let them sink under the censure of the House, as the present Board had done. It was ab- • thyd for Gentlemen on the other side to try to recri rninale, and he, it Le were the Chaiii:ellor of the Exchequer; would be ashamed of so doing. The case of Mr. Ridge, far from - making good the.charge of neglect which had, ben, preferred, would' prove .; directly the contrary. He wished they would look into all the di:Ai of that MipiniSfration of n htch he had formed a part, and . if they Would 'copy some of theM, the station .would gain litiudreds of thousands by t;:eir so doing: . • LoNo.contended that the case of Mr. Ridge . .had never been brought forward as a " set off," but when the Hon. Gentleman oppwite, came for Ward and said " look at- me'7—" I did all. this, Sce." The, Hon. Gentleman (Mr. A. cooper). had ,:stiewn that he did n.,t. Fle , h and blood could .not bear it. He had. them shewn from the .case of Mt. Ridge; that the' Hon. Gentleman -opposite was not rom error. quite tree Sir.J. NEWpoRT said, if his Majesty's. Ministers could brirg forward anv CharEi- •=4 . neglect:\ 4 eainst that side et,the House, they deserted.their duty An s talling io do . so. It was -their uniform condo& to recriminate, but most particularly it was the delight of the Chancellor of ihe'Exchequer.. On all Occa- . Mons he was ready to brjag• forward something of that sort, and say, °' if we have done wrong, you did worse." This; far from excusing-the misconduct of Ministers; was an additional charge - aeainst them ; if, knowing their opponents had done wrong, they forbore,.: to proceed against them. CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER agreed with Gentlemen opposite, that et - Ailing could be less a justification of the Conde& of. Ministers than finding fault- with others. , Nothing couldbe farther from his intentions than a wish to build his charac ter, or theChardaer of his friends; on the failings of others, a id really he did not think the House; or the country, would think highly of him, or of his friends, because the) stood a little higher than Gen- . tlettien opposite.—lf 'the Honourable Gentleman had the same ideasof.the-duiies ef the office he had held, while he filled - that situation, as he appeared • to entertain yeS;erday, from the view he had of his duty he was 'in a greater degice.enlpable than had been supposed. The Right. Honourable Gentle- Man then went over the sane grounds as Mr. A. Cooper, with respea to the provisions in the in struotions, the responsibiley of - officers, Six._ Per eons Coming inn - ) otfice.had a right. 'finding Places of that ,descrivtipn tillea up, to soppose the- proper securities had beep given. But it had been said the . Chancellor of the Exchequer, in particular,. was . always finding out !•oine stijed ofrecritnination. lf" he did al .rays recriminate when :they came for ward with their charges against. GOv'ertiiront; did it n follov that he al .e. ys had an opportunity of so dong ? Thus it appeared t at in thirteen months the r Administratiou had contrived to make up a sanwie of all that ha been complained of for the last t wr.trty .or thirty years. --He could not but own that they had beet) very . adroit in .such a little _time to aCt so -as to furnish out' of their abundance a cpanterpart to every thing of which. they cote plaitied. This was the. consequent e of that Con `ceneatiOn of talent of which they had vaunted so , meet). The charges madeegainst them.tiad not been intended to reduce them ,below the ordinary stan dad of men in point of talent ; but to think that an Hon. Gentleman should come there and plume •him-e self so much on what he had done, when such an Omission could be, proved, was too much to be borne ,in silence. At really was but just to give him a.biat teethe subject. If the Hon.•Gentle.inan wiShed for information en the subject he' had no objeolion to granting it; he would only state that on the preced- - ing day, when he entered that Honse, he had no more intention of.speakine of the case'of Mr. Ridge t tan be had, of :discussing•the concerns of the Eni-,* perer,of Morocco. That case would not have been brought forward: but for the exultation of the Hon. Geattletwo opposite., • • Mr. VoNsu-NBY observed the Right Honourable G. In ietuan seemed perfectly satisfied that he stood to lived Of tto foil,' and , that the higher he rose in e tike, the•greAter were his talents, and the greater tln .ad;ui; atiya. of the eetyle.—His.good nature,. be appeared convinced in his own mind, was equal to Otis capacity, as though capable of charging thoie opposed to- him with great negleti and numerous_ errors, he magnanimously forbore to do.- These Amiable qualities so eminently distinguished him,. in Ins own Opinion, that be (Mr. Ponsonby) knew not which most to admire hint for, his modesty with respeatto himself, or the-forbearance he-displayed tO warch others. Het hen contrasted the caseOfM r.Ridge ivith that of Mr. Hunt, tend argued,at length on the much greater negle& in the latter case than in the former. He called on the Chancellor of • the Ex 'chequer to . depart Irom.his usual course-of good na ture and forbearance to make whatever charges he could against him and his frienels. This they de sired, and there were only two things which they would not desire of Ministers, commendation and compassion. • Mr. CALCRAIT held in his hand the security of Mr. Ridge, dated February 24, 1810, this was joint and separate. If there was but one security he believed that one would be responsible at law,, and thus the public would be secure. He did - net accuse 'Ministers of recrimination, but of attempt :at recrimination. Their charges 'fell to the ground ; and of those brought against them, though some of them .were set aside by their-ma jorities, others Were.registered on the Journals. The Chancellor of the Exchequer had said he had no objeaion to grant the' information required. He (Mr. C ) was.much obliged to him; but the H ouse would see fair play when one of its Members•was abu4ed. The Cof Chancellor the txchequer.: -tai as.-if he bad the House of CommonS in his H. Chet. He did not ask him tor it, he c:manded it, be in .sisted on it from the House, and though he might be refused it by a maiArity of the 'House, they could not refuse to hear him, and luCkity.the words of the MeMberS of that -use, went forth' to "the country. His constituents would see thew, atd the people would do him jutice. Mr. Wisp 'called upon the Speaker to puta stop to such unconstitutional language. Mr. CALCAFT was sorry he had been disorderly, but sneaking of the House of Cominons as being in the pocket ..of the Chancellor of Or Ex chequer, he did not think could be exactly un constitutional. The House of Commons wis not in his pocket ;, he had been relieved of •thlt bur den by the 'independent Circle . which surrounded. him. _ The question was then put and agreed to, witl4- out opposition. . . • • .Mk. A. Cooma, then moved for papers-. telat jug to the securities of Mr. Hopkinson. • brderecl. SIR FRANCIS BURDETT. The SPEAKER thought, before they proceeded farther with the business befor them, it was his duty . to communicate to then) a paper which he had re ceived, signed Francis Burdett,'.' if it was their pleasure to hear it. The Ho,se assenting, the SPEAKER read, a letter, lUsubstance as follows • " To PHALLss. AszoTr. Esq. Speaker or the House Of CO - M 111 0 .113. 44 St.--You having-on the gth of April caused my houie, situated in that part of the City of Westminster. called Pic. cadilly,. to be forcibly entered, and having on the-same day caused me -to be illegally seized and committed to a prison, commonly.called his Majesty's Tower of London, do here. by give notice that I will, after the expiration of one eaten. dar month, trout borzzuf_ file a bill in the Culla' of -King's 13coch, .ott Proceed against Yus• am, 411“:. arc. « FRANCIS BURDETT." April 13, Tower of London." A short conversation ensued, but each of the Hon. Members spoke so uncommonly low, that we - could bear very little distinctly. The CUAKCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, •we un derstood) to wish the Letter entered on the Jour nals. The Su/00m hadnO,wioh but to do his duty. Mr. \V - . WYNNE was not aware of any advantage that could ar6e tiom the immediate insertion of the Letter: Mr. PONSONBY spoke, we think, nearly to the same &et. Mr. WHITBREAD, as the letter involved a que:- lton great importance, doubted whether, OR the tirit sight ot it, it would be proper to inserr it on the Journali. • The SPEAKER, as it concerned himself, was not at liberty to press the subject. - The conversation ended to the. Clerk's; being di reeted to insert the lener,on the Journals. BILL FOR REGULATING SECURITIES. Mr. A. Coorim thought the Home would have no objection to the Motion he was about 10 make. He then moved for•leave 'to bring in a MI for regu lating the Securities given by persons holding Places of Trust for the performance of the duties of their offices. Mr. FIORNER thOught the ilon. Gentleman ought. to have stated the,grounds on Which he wished for leaVe to thing the Bill. whenever a new in stance of delinquency wete discovered, a Bill .was to be.hrought in to prevent the like occurring again, the . delinquent Might constantly escape with impu nity, each Bill would prove - nugatory as the last,. and thus they might go on ad infinit . _ The' CifikNCELLOIT of. the ..EXCHEQUER' was of 'Opinion .that a)1 errors would ~be correted by. this )301-; and that it was a most .wiroleiorrie and opera-. tive mode of proceeding. Mr. PARNELL conceived it would be. a b.2tter me thod to address his Majesty for the l'ernoval of all Officers guilty of default in their duty; this was not a nugatory,. but the only real-method of preventing negligence. • • S Sir J. NEWPORT was of opinion, that the true way of preventing ►uture transgressions would be by pu itishing the past. It failure should take place; in consequence of the want of a- bond, !hey who did. not exa& that bond, of course should stand in its place; it was rather a curious circumstance, he thought, that law makers should be the first law breakers. • A fevi words ensued from Mr. R. WARD, Mr. BARING, alld 'Mr. WILBERiORCB, ,WhO supplied the motion.. The question was put, and leave given tu, bring in, the Bill. . IRISH TITHES; Mr. PARNELL said, that in rising to submit to the House a mode by which the present .Colledion.of, Tithes in Ireland_would be improved, he had strong claims on its attention. These claims would un doubtedly become stronger, .i.viten the Honse would idled on that subject so dear to` the people- of Ire land, Emancipation. It- had unfortutiately haPririm ed that the refusal of adopting this Mei:fibre had created in that country such a disappointment,-that it was necessary the House should fix on some plan of attaching its feelings' to them.: Since Emancipa tioit had failed, an improventent in the levying of- Tithes would be some Compensation, and woUld afford some relief to the grievances the,y complained of. He begged leave to call the . recolleetionof the House to the proceedings .which had taken place on ,this subjea.- He had presented .a Petition the-Ses sion before last from the County he had the honour to represent;' it vvas then in the'contemplation of a Right Hoo. Gentleman to propo;e some measure for the relief,of the various complaints; unfortu nately, on investigation, he foundit impossible to carry it into effect. He was abeutto 'propose one which he hoped the House would receive. As to the necessity of relief,. it already was evident, from the intention' he had just adverted.to. He would. not enter at large into the 'nature of . tithes ; he was. anxious, however, •to point out to the •House the state of thorn in Ireland:* He would, in .the first place, call its attention to the religion of the ceun try ; the far greater part of. the inhabitants did not belong to' the Prinestant peratiasion ; notwith standing, they were . cdled in to pay a very. heavy tax to the Protestant Clergymen ; arid likewise to their own cleiglmen for the dis charge. of their funhions. If it is allowed that the population of Ireland amounts to five millions; of that 'writher four millions are Catho lics ; and the half. ; 4 , 1 the remainder is composed of ProteStaat Dissenters, and Quakers ; in -a word, if . the whole was divided into ten parts one out of , that ten would not belong to tnose whom the rest i. were oblige tto maintain ; such a statement. lie 'be lieved to be dpositiv.e tact. In Mr.. Newenharn's 4 ork on. the paolatiOn,of Ireland, he states that in . Ulster the prop° , von Catholics to Protestants- is as 2to 1 ; Alunstei as 15 to I; in Leinster as-5 to 2 ; in the (hoc, se of 'foam, as sixty to one ; in the parish .4 T he considers contains the greatest number ut Protest,mts for its extent, the pi (Toll Wo is as sx to one in Le county (;f Clate 15 to L. 7l'ating the prop(); Lion .on the whole sio ply as nine to one, it must appear impossible to make an adequate' remedy. 'ln bringing forward these tads, be. was perfealy aware that the relief could: n..t to e..tire. The nature:: of the ael of. Uni,Ji was such he was sure a perfect remedy could not possibly 'take place. When the Petition.lay before the House on .the subject of , Tidies,. he was. con vinced that not only the. Catholics but the Protes taut s-Avere in a great-treasure anxious for relief; - the ProteStatit Clergy themselves were friendly to .Anoih'er peculiar grievance arosefrom the rniseries,.! of the poor; in Ireland there existed such a compe4 titiop for employment, that wages for labour was - very low ;- the extent pf the metropolis, and the want of capital, principally occasioned this; and the consequence Was,. that the poOr Were ohliged to de. pend Solely. for subsistence on their little tenements of land ; the poorest labourers - were subje& tolithegl . and many who, were exempted` front paying taxes to, the King, were liable Ito this. Tit'us the Protestant Clergy being' supported by persons so poor, gave rise to every species of misery. All this wasinCreased . by consigning the colleilion of their own dues-to , othersi being prevented_ from doing so..thernSelves_ through a fear of resistance, they found it necessary to employ such ~p ersons, who; from their and tyranny, were aaapteu tor such business. Of such measures mobs,anst insurreetions were the con sequence. To.obviate this laws on laws were passed, till in tact a. new code . was established. The. usual mode for redress, .the application for drawing Atm tithes, was abolished by the method of calling every such, application a conspiracy ;-and - through a dread of • this, they were deterred from having recourse to. it. "I'lle.diflittenee between this. law. and-the- law of - England is great; if it was nothing but to assi= milate these laWs, he hoped his . plan would receive - the sanction of the House. Another- distinction was with respect to flax ; here it is ,charged 5% an acre, there front six to, eigtit shillings; if a bruit was put to this tithe, the cullivation of this important article in Ireland would be greaCy assisted, chiefly .! as the soil in the North was so well adapted tor it.. This mode of collecting tithes, he asserted to he:alto- • gether injurious, to agriculture, and for . this he had the authority of Doctor Paley. He desired the House would call to its recollection the year I 808, when the Baltic was shut up, and this country 'so dreadtoily Situated in respect of corn ; it was through the means of Ireland it was supplied and he like wise 'wished the Hoase to observe, the hist year no less titan 800,000.quartars had been imported. In the last Session when ,he madethis proposition tathe House, it was objected..to, because. he could produce no settled Plan ; he then thought it was ,better to I introduce it generally, that time might be given to contader the most advantageous mode; -if the House was now but to pledge itself that it ,would intitutean • r inquiry, and then adopt a plan, he was confident its completion, would be most practicable. His chief on jcts in this .mode. were to exonerate the poor ; to take • away the obligation of Catholics pay ing Protestant Clergymen," and to give them a re 7 'compence. The remedies of corn tithes and leas-' mg tithe's as were ptoprosed some time ago, were, in the Opinion.ot .Pitt ; _totatly incompatible with the wealth and fesources. of the country. His plan was simple ; the first ,step would 'be to ascertain the value of the Clergymen's benefices, and the , next to pay them the net. amount of their income ; by,the,means of - a tax whiCh would not be under stood as a tithe. In the_years 1786 and 1757; se veral Clergymen had lost considerably by the White Boys ; the Acts which were then . passed for -their ,compensation would now very much assist the ob taining the knowledge of their incomes, and., the exact value could .be acquired fibril -.the Board of First Fruits. The number of Protestant Clergymen in Ireland, he believed, now amountedlo.i 300 ; if the whole revenue was divided, each would have an ! nuallylsol. in all 195;0001. - which, together with . 20,000 acres of glebe land„, would amply compen sate them; by the preSent mode the. whole-,of the, Tithes AtUOUnt to 500,0001. a year. Another objea could be obtained which would secure the Clergy from the depredation of money; •by taking the ave . rage price of wheat at diffilrent periods. By pur suing these measures,, the atiettions of the country would be conciliated. The Clergymen themselves are in a [nail ner degraded by beiniobligee lb depend for their subsistenci.; on tfie pocTesi. t7reatures, and subjected to the impoiitions of the Tithe-farmer. and Proctor. This case was siitrnltted some years ago by the Hon. Member for Dublin, he therefore conhi not be blamed for bringing lorward an entire new proje&; it was then proposed that the country should be rated; he wished toy recommend a get:.l;:hl taxation, There had been •cotistant - against the tithes, one 'lasted- thirty years—it bad _ . jiver) rise. to the United - Irishmen and - to ite 'Thrashers. He did not knoW if tlicrei . asany ter alteration in the e: onteniplatiob of the Right Hon. Gentleman opposite ; it was, hOurever, neccss,,ry to adopt some useful measure. . The popple. Of L,elatnd. al w'a-vs believed that one of the objects of he -11. , i 011 would bean alteration in the.Colia,uon of tithes, The speech of au illustrious States man (Mr. Pitt) O 1 this subjea was printed, and sent ro all -parts that country; in this. he. strongly condeinned 1. 1 :e exist in system of tithes. Ha was:sorry; to say Ili°. chief benefit the Union had.promisede :was nweY afforded. He therefore moved, • " That a Select Cunirnit tee be sppointedito inqtfire into tits mode of col tee.titag tithes ; and all, cirettatstatlCC4 .relative t v the levying btid col letting chem.". He hoped the House would'uot obje& to this mo tion, lest it should be: coobtrued into refusal .0. hearing .the complaint - , of, that people.. adverc ei to the situation of Ireland, where .the inh:thi-. tants, from the refusal. •of .emancipation,- driven into .21 state of despair:: He : (4welt on progress_ of tbe•Fieticii in . the Tenitisnla,-and Alto well grounded apprehension of invasi ti ; and r. 11l these circumstances, he trusted that the.Pfinle,;•Ali" nister would net object to his motion. Mr. WELLESLEY'POLE reeuetted the indulgence of the'Housefer a fel.v Minutes, while he stzited`hi 9 ` sentiments. upon the subject _which the Hon.. tleman ,had brought forward. It was 'one -had-long - engaged.his attention, aid - liaLrbeen the tabject , • of his most anxious SolicitUde .; - it was - one to which his Majesty's Ministers had -most seriotiVY. devoted their theughts. In rnanyr44 , the poittiti which had been stated by the Hon. Gentleman had just fiat (.164.11, he pertedly concurred. He mitted ,hit it was a sUbjea of the gremest import .ance,,and that it was the: duty of Goferninent to apply a remedy to the evils confplained - of, providA" it could be done.consistent with - justice; but be ;not agree with the. Hun..Gentiernan, with r egard to the remedy, which he had sutlesied; nor could ha . :give his assent to the Motion with w loch the Hon- Gentleman had.. concluded. Ho could not give his , his assent to a motion for the House now 16 appoint a Committee to inquire into tlik. snbjeet, because he thi-inght it would -be.most a jtuioiis to the cause Which -all- patties - 114 in view, and! most unjust 10 the parties concerned, for ilk.. House to appoint 3 Cotnmittee to inquire - - into this subject; without .seeing their `way much more clearly than they (11 , 1 a t present, and - without having: some rational pro-pea • that that inquiry would be attended with success. If . the Hon. Gentlethati had mok'ed for lea-i'c to bring in a Bill; and had s'aied the provisions which he meant to introduce= into it, : if - nehad - pro, Tse'l ' any specific plan, he. vL otild have been ready to (is -cuss .that plan; - but theHon;'Gentlemini had pur - Sued a different - COorkm& hel pro(ised, to re f ' r all the petiborfs, winch had lieea.piSeated, to die • Mils; to a Qum mittee; andTiodesire it t o consider the whole subjerSt, and to devise s.ante remedy; _al.". th - 011gtithe Hoff: ,Gc.-Mtlehiiiti Maisel( had *not, all the.;, , -t - or:nn.tioO that he h a d o bt a in e d, an d withal'. had employed, .bei:-n able the diligence which h e propose any : plan to the House himself. Th. Hon. Gentleman had stated ; that the great -evil•respecting tythes, arose from the mode of collecting them- 4 ! :That he did not accuse. the.body rat the Cierge -hu t - the greater part of th e o p u f ess i ons •were prattis;d by the Proaors, WhoMthe Clergy were obliged toe plOy. It appeared to hint that. he Honnurahle Gentleman was mistaken - with respect to the scitire ° of the grievances which were complained of. 1 11° '' grievances; in ,his opinion, arose from:a cause not perhaps generally known to the Membe: - sof, 1 h :1r House, but it %4 ; . as proper " that it should be faid,7' stated to them. A pra c tic e .h a d prevailed generakt throughout Ireland tor a great many years, of letting their lands by public cant, that is, of letting them 1 ° the, highest bidder, without ail consideration of . inctunbrances to. which the land-was' li bl.. '£h 6 consequence was, that . ignorant persons..b d for V id , • Lind; and are the fa ValUe for it; withunt at I' 4 Considering that in addition to the. very high that they paid, that they had al,o to pay tythes. I t appeared to-han that the tythes ought to bt• tiered as the first rent to 1„-+.1nch the land:as jet but ignorant 1:-.eri;ons, as he had before staled' in their eagerness to, get the land; agreed to pay to is ;' full:extent of its value, witho,..t - refletting sides. that rent they ~ had to pay the tythes, , landlord forced the tenant to pay the Ant, and v,.1“-'l l they : were unable to pay the, tythes„ supported 010 . ag,antst the 'CLirgy and the Proilor, so that the landlord was the oppl'essor, and not the Clero" - man, the Lay Improptiator, or the "'rector. • •lie could assure the Hotbe, that this subje:a let! heels` for a long time under the coni:ieeratiott of that several Bills had actually been prepared tel . I b e • purpose of applying some remi.dy, but neenviett examination, it was found th could . 01.4.1)-, , . into etre& wits, justice to the parties iatertstod• Honourable had.declared it to be • 4, - I ' ; ' opinion, 'that none of hich been suggested by those who hat devoted tit.z.:r tention to this subjed, viz. those of coro selling or of leasing.tha tythes, ileSirecl...eife.6l, and yet each thele been 'strongly recointmoded by,;; persons •k 4 bad devoted their time to the coriniderxian " 17 this subje6t. in one part of his speech the Hu" mutable Gentleittail steme,d to think 1: that . ' Clergy had an . undciubted. right to the Wboleof . tythes," and yet when became to su g g e st his o'vfl plan, he bad Stats.d . , that in tnakihl..;,.the Clergy 3 eoMpensation, it should be for the tythes as the! \vete first established,. and not for the tytlies as C;(1 were now. He , ready had. hover hard such idea, broached before ; in all the' plans- which ha' had ever beard suggested, it had, •never - mice bet:tt propiised that the Chirgy should .nut have; tbeic rights fully secured. •in his view of the subject thot objea ought• always to .be carefully. attended to; (Sir J. Newport nodded, assept)--he was hippy ta,. find tit*. upon that p,,hut he had the concurr e nce 0 1 the Honourable Baronet, who had turuedhis attete lion F.,0 -much to theAnestion,:of tythes. ininself awn and anxiously lookel- to this stibjeo l, nd front MI the reports whiCh he irad! 'seen r,!s * peifr i g it, it appeared, to him that the :,apltppropri.ttoY. Z