The Sun. — London, England, 1809-07-08 00:00:00

~~,~~~ LAB' REPORT. DOCTORS' I'ONIMON7S; fuLy' 7. WELLESLEY- V. I,'S ELLESLEY This was a proceeding or cause of divorce or ,se-• r aration from bed, board, and rntituarcobabition, promoted on the part of the Hon. Henry • Welles .: ley. against the - Right Honourable Lady Charlotte 'ellesley, his wile, by reason of adultery, alleged . to have been,committed_with the Right Honourable Lord Paget. The fads .and - circurns;anees of this ease having been , so recently before the public; when a verdict 'of 20,p001, damages was obtained against Lord Paget in the Comm:ill Law Court, it will be. unneceisary to repeat. them again. The Court; aft , . r hearing , the evidence read, and the Counsel on both sides, is as dearly of opinion, - that the fad of adulteri, was completely proved, and ae- Or:Jingly pronounced the husband to be entitled - to the remedy he prayed. DAVIES V. DAVIES. This was a suit of divorce instituted'on the part of Mary. Davies aglinst 'William Davies her husband, by reason.of cruelty and ad - ultery.. 'lt ; appeared that. the marriage in this case took place between the pirties on the 4th of November, 1804; and that they continued to live and cohabit together, as man and wife, till 1806, when Mrs. D ivies separated from her husband,. on account of his ill treatment and personal violence towards her, and his adulterous in- , tercourse with women of the town, whereby her health became much injured* The facts being made out to the satisfaaion of die Court, it was of opinion' the wife was entitled to the relief she prayed, and accordingly pronounced for the•same. • B: NG v. PRICE, (falsely calling herself BING). • This was a suit of . nullity of marriage, instituted by Susannah Bing, widoW, as the natural guardian of John Bing, her son, against Mary Price, by reason of Minority. It appeared that the parties Were mar ried by licence, obtained by the woman on tile 30th August, 1807, the minor (John Price) being not then 17 years of age, and which marriage was so leinn4ed ‘virhont the knowledge or consent of Su sannah Bing, the mother. The necessary fats being clearly proved in this case, the Judge (Sir Writ: Scorn) pronounced the marriage,to be null and void. GURNEY V. PRICE, (falsely calling herself GoixNEy). This was a proceeding of nullity of Inairiage, ,brought by Charles Gurney, the husband, against Anne his wife, by reason of minority: From the proceedings it appeared, that the parties were married in 1803,- by license, obtained on the oa - h of the husband ; and the material points to be established in this cas e ~ were the proof of the mi nority of the party; and want 'ot consent of the father; w ho, it appeared, had 'absconded from his family, when his daughter Ann was only three years old, and went to America, and had not since that titne been heard of. The Court, after making several pertinent observations applicable to the case, was of opinion that the proof was defeCtive as to the' points of minority and Want of consent, and there:- fore dismissed the application made on the part of the husband. COURT OF KING's BENCI-1, pity 7. P 1 ARSON AND OTHERS V. HiTTCHINSON. This was xi action against the indorser of a Bill of Exchange for 1601. under the following citlCum stances. The Bill had. been lost by the holders, who had offered au indemnity .to the Delendpnt if he • could pay it. The.Defettclant.said they must pro duce the bill—they could not do so, and therefore brought am aCilcm. In a Court of Equity, if it was proved that the Plaintiffs hpd offered to give the necessary guarantee, the Court wOuld'assist them, and, he added, that if the same proofs were adduced in a Court of L w, also, Ley might recover in' this /talon. Lord ELLENBOROUGH, C. J. was clearly of opi nion, iliar the Law, of the case was against him. , 7- The Plaintiris were nonsuiled. BOTHAM.V. DIXON. Thin was an aElion brought by the Plaintiff, an innkeeper, at Salthill, against the Defendant, the proprietor of the City Repository, Barbican, for 391, Fes. paid for a horse, which the Defendant war rdnted quiet to ride and quiet in harness, but which the Plaintiff returned as unquiet. The Defendant_ did not produce any evidence of the quietness of the bore, but relied on his conditions of sal e , by one o f which, it was . declared, that though the horse should not answer the warranty, yet if be Was not .reiiuned by six o'clock the pext evening after the sale, the ptirchaser must keep him with all fatilts. After a very distin& and impartial charge by Lord .ELLENBOROUGII, in which his. Lordship observed, that it would. be difficult for the Defendant to Carry on bUsiness at all, if his conditions of sale were not to he adhered to, and that it appeared the Defendant 441 A been very industrious in making known the con ditions by which he sold, the Jury immediately found a verdia for the Defendant. JULY 6.. SEDUCTION. !lEESOM V. CIIIVERS. r.‘ The ATT9RNEY-%.7ENERAL stated thi s to be ati ac tion brought for ,the sedu&ion, by the defendant, of the plaintiff's daughter. It was a case which w-oilid call for the grave-attention of the Jury, The plaintiff's daughter had received a religious edu cdtion, aid had been brought u'p in the paths of vir Ric, an] she had no eyil example set to her. The short statement of the case was this :—The plaintiff a respeaable tradesman, who lived by the river . %i.te, at the. bottom of the street that 'leads from Silisbury-court, Fleet-street, to the Thames. On t he metnorable occasion of the procession up the river, of the remains of the late Lord -Nelson, the plaintiff admitted a number of persons on his pre- . wises, - which commanded a view Of the river.— ..A.tnong the persons so-admitted. was the defendant, who then was, and now is, the first mate of an ' Eact-Incliaman. He was introduced by a gentleman -of the name of Knight. In the evening of that day many of those who were present at that sight had a d.n and the defendant chanced to dance.with this • young lady, who was the subjea.of Then ab iut 17. An intimacy thus arose between the de fondant and the pl tintiff's fami;y, which he visited very frequently, bit nothing occurred to excite the suspicion •of the plaintiff, or any part of his: fa- _ After this_ the defendant went on a voyage to 'and returned in the year 1808, when het t re newed his acquaintance with this family at plaintiWs house, which was then at Christ Church reef, on the other site of Blackfriars-bridge soon after which, this young woman eloped from her pa tents, and it was iiot until the ,e4lh of March that her parents discovered'where she,was, and that was at a lodging in which she was kept,bY the defendant, a place in Tabereacle-Tow,. in the City.. Upon this discovery of where she was, the- plaintiff wrote to the defendant a proper letter, reproaching him with his rniscondua, and telling. him that he could make . no 'atonement for it but that of marrying the young woman . , to' which he paid no regard whatever ; upon which the plaintiff, _her father, arid his4ife brought the Young woman home, with the hope of reclaim ing,her, : but she elopedeigaie with the defendant the following day, and had lived with him in a• state of fornication ever since, and.does so at present... This was a serious case, and he put it to the Jiiry to con sider what either of theelsel;:es, as probably most of them were parents would expect hi case this-had -happened to one of their own daughieri., He had further to observe, that if this young woman, 'at tending to the. dilates .of her conscience, and to the principles of that religion in which she was edu cated, should ever knock at her parents' door, ask foigiveness, and.seek proteaiou, ,the door should be opened unto her, and she should meetwith what she should so seek; meanwhile - the Jury would do the injured father's feelings justice: • The witnesses being called, none appeared. His Lordship indulged theplaintiff's attorney with time to go 'to look .after thbm- at the,coffee-house, and then gently rebuked ,him for not taking-care that they were ready before the cause was opened. The plaintiff'S eldest son Was-thefirst witness. — He said his father was a chair and eabinct-maker ; and in the year 1806, resided , Salisbury-street, 'with prenlises commanding a • view the river. He then gave an .account the defendant, who is the first mate of an East-Indianian, being introduced,- ' asahe Attorney-General had opened, to his lather's family, through the medium of Mr. Knight ; of-his dancihg with the sister.of. the witness, then of the age of 17 ; ..it was the night of the funeral Of Lord Nelson ; of his visiting the family frequently after wards ; and of the final elopement of the sister of the Witness ; the place to which ..he went was not discovered for five months afterwards by her parents, ;,althpugh the witness knew where she was.abont fortnight after she left home. -His sister ,reque , ted him not to inform •ther father or mother where she -was, for that would .be her destruCtion, since in that that case Mr. Chivers would go to sea, and never see her again ; . and thus be was prevailed on bY his sister not to tell their parents where she- was; but his fa ther endeavoured to discover where she was, -which he found at last, by the information dt the mother, who inquired at the India House whether the de-' fendant was gone abroad ; found, he was not, met him afterwards at the' Jerusalem Coffee-house, where they found out where the yOug woman way, and got her back again in a fortnight ; but she went away again the next morning. The 'reason why . they did not go sooner for her was, Ow she was dan gerously ill of a fever, and could not with safety be removed. This the witness knew.; for he went to see her in her illness., He, was sure it was ,against the consent of the father that she went away. She was not present in Court to-day ; but she was in Court on, the first day of the, present'sittings, when this couse was expeaed to be tried, and was intended to he examined as a witness she was the person who (aimed and excited so much entotion in Court on that occasion ; she was on that occasion handed into a hackney-coach by her father,- and she went back to her plesetit ; but her father never visited her there.' Thomas Christopher Meesom,_ the next brother was then examined, gave an account of his, siSte, having eloped fr om h er f am il y on t h e 17t h of March,. and none of the family knew of it before that time. This witness said he accompanied' his mother to the Jerusalem coffee-house, where they found the'de 7 fendant, and where the mother put to the defendant the question point-blank, forthe 'purpose of confnsing him-.—saying to him, " You know the bUSiness lam come npon ; and he seemed very much confounded. He said nothing distio6tly, but muttered, and' seem ed , frightened. The mother said, "You know the busines; I am come upon, _but this is not the•pro per place to speak about it ;" and asked hith where he would appoint a proper place to Meet her, and he proposed the'Cross.Keys, iu Gracechurch-street, at tour o'clock, "and they met there accOrdingly.---7 The mother requested to know where the young woman was. : The mother Saw 'that the Defendant was guilty, and demanded to know where her child was, ,and the Defendant took a pen and ink, , and wrote the direaion, No. Tabernacle-row, saying, at the same time, that - she was dangerously ill, and begged of the mother to be, - goad-temp6ed with' her, and then she might be : as well as ever; but it Might be dangerous to cross her in that state. He then accompanied the mother and the witness as far as Finsbury 7 square; fo conduct them part.of the way-, and then lett them, and said be would be dowry in the evening.. The witness saw his sister 'after wards:. she was so ill then in .bed that she Could hardly speak. Cross-examined, he said tjiey-, went four or five times - to see her, but never until they went to de mand her home. When she came home she slept with her sister and her eldest brother in the same bed ; - but when they awoke in the morn ing she was gone. Her sister that slept with her, was eleven, and the brother eighteen ; they slept in the same bed: with her to take care of her, but she escaped in 'the' morning before they were up. Mr.Chivers.used to come very often, un til the father and mother looked cool upon him, and then he kept away ; after which the young wo man becanie very perverse, used to provoke her mo-. ther • on purpose taget out, pretending she was ill used, although nobody beat her. _ About a fortnight 'after Mr. Chivers left off visiting she would not live at home; her father never 'chastised her, lie bad very little to do with her; she constantly framed excuses to go out . to meet Mr.,thbers. There was nothing.impropei'in.ber„ conduct - before - she went , away: They had. uo opportunity of doing any thing improper at her fathees,• they were 'never left by themselves. After sh 4 was gone, She fiequentry. wrote letters tb her parents as ,it they came from Brentford, and that for about four months but she contrived always to have. them pht into the letler box of a house in which there was a clerk who was acquainted with her family, and they always came without a post-mark ; -so that they could never trace her until they foUnd out the Defendant at the Jere-: salem Coffee-house. It thepappeaied in evidence that This young wo 7 man was perfeetly inodest in her manner.before the elopement, .and perfeolly constant to the Defendant after it, and went by the naive of Mrs. Chivers ever since ; that she is now very ill, and had said to some of some of the witnesses she hoped. the Court would dispense with het attendance a 4 a witness this day. Here Lord ELLENBOROUGU suggested to the par ties the pnlicy of their coining to an accommodation without, proceeding further . ; upon which Mr. Gar row went out of Court, and consulted his client, but returned withbut accomplishing bis object. _ _ Mr. GARROW, for the . Defendtpt, contended, that this was not a,case for excessive damages, and: that the action was very properly 'brought forrthe loss of. services of ethe .daughter ; as it was not for a 'compensation to the daughter, but to.the father.-- He remarked, with some severity, ripon the neglet of the Plaintiff, in suffering-his daughter to escape a second time, and particularly in not using due dili gence- for her discovery. Under all the circum stances., he held that the damages, if any, ontst be very nioderate. - . Lord ELLENBOROUGH, in 'addressing the Jury, said, there could be no, doubt of an improper inter course having taken place.; •and that it was a casein which there was much to •be felt, and something to•be blamed ; -although. perhaps not to the extent insisted:upon by the Counsel .for the ,Defendant.- There ' Were. no aggrabted attendant circumstances, no regular plan of sedu,-,tion, in which case the laW would allow compensation in a wore extended view, than for the mere loss of services; there, appeared a mutual -affeCtion. The Plaintiff was, however, entitled. to their -verdia - , .unlesS, they .thought that his daughter threw herself into the arms of the Defendant, • His Lorti•dlip - concluded by recom mending to the Jury to take all the circumstances into their temperate consideratiorr, and give-such verdict aw they thought consistent -with justice: , The Jury, -after a few minutes consideration, re turned a verdict for the Plaintiff---Damages; :701. • • the American, in forwarding his goods to th 4 British Islands, has second freight to pay, and hcre the;ir. produce is already 'plenty, and at low ••-• • • • price§. A mericanVessels to pay a Tonnage Ilutyof 6s. 8d per ton. - Ditto - Produce iii their Vessels-. Flour 6 8 per barrel. Ditto Corn'Meal - - 3 4 per ditto. Ditto - -Corn, Pease, and Beans - oto per bust4l. Ditto . • ' 3 4 per cwr. Ditto - 'BoSton Chips - 3 4 per .M Ditto - - Shingles Ditto - . Stai,res- Ditto . - Pitch Pine Lumber - - Ditto - 4 , - Common Ditto - - -• to o ditto. Ditto - Wood Hoops - - - 5 A ditto; Ditto - Horses, Cattle, &c. - to o ditto. A most melancholy accident happened on Friday seinnight,, in two of the pits belonging to Messrs. Lee, Watson, and Co. situate at East Ardsley; near Wakefield.—Ten men and lout boys, colliers, em ployed in the said pits, were instantly drowned by the bursting ; it is supposed, of the tunnel of some' old pits,)yiug near and not now in uce.—Tire waler,wluch is not less than ten or eleven yards deep in each pit, is drawing Off as quick as possible, bits it was thought th'e bodies could not be, got out before TueSday:— SeveraLof . the unfortunate sufferers have left wives and families. HASTINGS V. CROSBY. . The PlAintiff, an eminent artisr, , brought this aEtion to ,recover (he sum of eighteen guineas, for designs for engravings. to a periodical work, called Literary - Recreations, published by the Defend ant. On the part of the - ,PlaintirE it was proved, that he had entered into an agreement to furnish the 'designs in question at two guineas each ; he had been paid six guineas for the first three, but when he demanded payment foi nine subsequent ones, it was refused by 'the Gentleman who atspre sent superintends Mr: Crosby's affairs; who al leged, that although Mr. Crosby published the Li terary Recteatioria, he did it on. account of the- Editors, and was not himself responsible. • .The re ceipt for the money paid by Mr-Crosby being pro duced, it ,verified this assertion, as it . expressly stated the 'Money to have been received on account atilt; proprietors.—The Plaintiff was, in consequence, nonsuited. WARRANTY OF A HWtSE. WATERS V. FULLER. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, in stating this case, said, the Plaintiff, a Gentleman of .fortune, lsrtr chased a horse from the Defendant, for which he agreed to give him another horse, worth sul. and a check for 251. the Defendant warrantih, , ° the hprse sound. Alter two short jaurneys, the horse was discovered to be lame in both feet, hating bad bloody corns, and Mr. Wateis requested to have his bay horse and money returned, desiring Mr. Fuller-10 take back his Chesnut gelding, which he refused, unless the Plaintiff would lose r5l. by his contract. A number of witnesses were then - called, who swore that the horse had a running thrush, • - a con traction'in his fore-feet; and that he wascompleteiy. lame. A latter -was also put in, which indirectly admitted-the warranty. Mr.. GARROW) for the Defendant, said that he. should content himself with 'proving that the horse was perfectly sound, and that he should then be en titled to the-verdict of the. Jury. Five witnesses were then .ealled, who swore pOsi tively that the horse had no defectl—that it was well proportioned,—and, fact, quite the • reverse. of what had. been represented -by the witnesses for the Plaintiff, ; • The horse being• in the neighbourhood, some of the parties-were dispatched to examine him ; they soon returned, and brought with them a piece of a .corn cut from-the horse's toot, and he- was also ad mittecL on this examination, to have gonefailuig. 11 verdict was in' consequence given for the Plain tiffi—Darnages 751. JAMAICA.' t. EXTRACT OF. A LETTER,' DATED- ICANGSTOII, JA MAICA, MAY 20'. • " A law has been eriatled here, and is now in force; imposing a Topnage Duty upon . American vessels, as well . as upon . American: produce imported therein ii to this island, the rates of which .1 shall annex '; this measure appears to do away and falsify all t he former representations of our Planters respecting the necessity Of an intercourse in AmeriCan vessels, and negotiating any treaty with that .country. I hope Minister's will not forget the several topics so ably urged .by themselves when opposing the American Intercourse Bill of . 006, andresume that part of our Navigation system" so long relaxed in . favour of those all-grasping People. The American adven turers to the West Indies; since the raising the Em bargo, will stiffer most severely,; the Spanish and neutral islands are lull of their produce : in the for mer, a duty of 10 dollars. per parrel has been impos ed on flour, as an encouragement to the 'Mexicans, where. any quantity of Wheat may . be raised, and . , ..- -- r LONDON :,-I'rint e d by RICHARD HARRIS, of No. 4, Maraca-con Bow street ; .and Published by WILLIAM A lIMIG Ell SCR' PI ) .8, South M Iton.street, Grosvenor_ square. At the SUN - OFFICE, No: _ 11 2, - Strancrf where AdverviiTrenis, O n leis - for the Paper, Letters for the Editor, &c. (pori-puia), must b.( addressed. : SHIP ME/PS GRAVLSK.ND, JULY 6. Arrived—the Governor Milne, 1-iaya, from Rio janeir4 and the Kitty, Shore, from Virginia. Sailed —the Fame, Duncan„ for Jamaica ; and the liar molly, Malcolm, Yucatan. • !6/RTIJ.~' _ . . On Wednesday laq, the lady of Licuynant-Colonel Rushbrooke, of Rushbrookc. Hall, Suffolk, of a llaukhter. _ Lately, at Coalbrook, in• the County of Tipperary, ,the Lady ul Char!es Langley, Esq. of a Haur,hiter. . . On Thursday last, the Lady of Thomaslialliday, Esq.. at his house in Wimpole-streer, ofa llaugoter. The same day, at Portsmouth, Mrs. Mackenzie, of Strith grave, 'of a_Stin and Heir. Ve.sterday morning, Mrs. Hamilton, of Hun!er-street, 13rubsivick-square, of a Son. A-148 I I L I) , . . Ott , Monday, by sp ec i a l It eeuse , at 'Tt:_igninouth, on, ,Charles Noel Noel; Esq. P. son of Ccrard Nord Noel, Esq. of Exton Pink, Rutlaod, only daughter of Thomas ‘Velman, Esq. of Poundsfxd Park . , ia the County of Soineeset. • On Tuesday, Mr.. William Beckett, of the Royal Navy, to Miss larioise, daughter of Mr, Thomas farvoise of His Majesty's Viaualling-Office,. Portsm o uth. , On Wednesday, at Cheltenham, Mr. - Robert Ccok, of that place, aged about 70, to 'Miss jenny Bevan, .a youiig Lady of about half that age. The happy couple left the church in one sedan chair, amidst the acclamations of the surrounding speaaturs. • _ , • On Thursday last; at Banstead, - in Surrey. the Rev. Pe ter Aubertin, 'cedar or Chipsteati. in the same County, to Henrietta, yOungest daughter of Daniel Lambert; Esq. of Banstead. • On the tSt inst. at Elharn, Captain Nichol], of the South Kent Volunteers, to. Mrs. of Dover . . On Friday se'rulight;-.Lieutenant Frederick ritigh Evelyn Houghton, of Alajcst)'s Royal Nary, to Anna, 'only daughter of Richard Vicars_ EsCl• of, Duncetnpon Fort. DIED. On the,tith ult. 'zit Lieutenant 11.icliard Maun. drell, R. N. of the Severn District of Sea Nencibles. On SUnday •se'aniktit, at Wickbw, after a tedious illness the 1-I,pri, anti guy, Maurice Crocbie, D. D. and D ean Of Li , mericic. On Saturday., after a lingering illness, Signor I nvetto, the celebraterl.endingenious fire-work. maker.. On Tuesday last, at Donnington, near Newbury, Miss Elizabeth Allen, daughter olAndLeW Allen, Esq. of D.on ningfon. , , PRICE OP .17 . 0CKS YESTE, n,Y, ' India Stock, India Bonds, 495. 2cs. far. Excheq. Bis, 6s. t.O. pr. Omniun, I mperial . 3 per Cent. 67' Ditto Ann. - ' Cons. for Opening, 6; ft' _ bank Stock, •Nayy t per Cent. 98 • per Cent t 797, Irate 5 per Cent. 4 per Cent. 83i g 4 per Cent. Rea oS 3 per Z:ent: Coiii. t,7 # 3 - Bank L. Anti: 18 t t64ths CURE OF STONE AND (;RAVEL. ---- • —• I\4R. PERRY, Surgeon, Southampton-street, Bloomshtiry-square, Proprietor - of ApA MS's .S 0 VENT, a mild yet efficacious Cure of STONE and.GRA. VE L in the BLADPE it or IC, I)N EY S, acquaints the Pub- Lt.!, that he has for some, years devoted his whole professional attention to the above Dis'eaSes. HeJnay be consulted at Lis own _House. on- Wednesdays and I' ridayS, where he dispenses the Solvent in bottles of 4s. 6d. its. and iI. 2s, Stamps included,. two of which last scarcely ever fail to 6or. reef the calCulous diathesis in the habit, and thereby prevent the concretion of Stone in persons ofa sedentary lite. Sold also at Bacon and Co's, 150, Oxford• street, and at Bolton's, front of the RoYal Exchange, the Author's `• quisition of the Stone and Gravel," Ninth Edition,. price Is. 6d. pointing• out their Cause, and the Diet to tie observed. during the Cure, with many ek traordinary Cases, some of perfect recovery even after the operation ha4.been resolved on.- May to had at Symonds's, BuLsik.-.)eller, No. 20 - , Pater noster-row, price ts. 6d. To. THOM A S - I A YLO P., Esq. Sir. No. 0, New 13r4;e-street, Black.fritirs. JCONSIDER it out an ad of justice clue to the merits of yimr LEAKE 's PA. TENT t ILLS, to coat- municate to you the tol mg . Cure which has recently, been .performed by them :.—A n Acquaintance Of mine,/ by the breaking out of an old Venereal Complaint (attended by a complication of di sor d ers - ark:lga her,!trom), teas reduced al. most to s a , skeleton ; anti although - he - had the best - medical advice which.conld be olmai,,ed, and tried a vitrieyof Patent MedicineS., nothing CAtildlre Frocured which scented ts* snit . his case, or to do hint any sers ice : he remained in ti m„ it duced and pitiable . situation friitwo years,- unable to loliCom his profession, and scar c ely ..hit' ug walk.or even to s: and im his legs; in tact no one who knew him eeer . .si . pposed ir pos sible for - hiot to recover. He was advised at last to try your Leake's did s ru,h stririly to • given with them. lie hat nut Likell InQiel than two boxes he.. , tore he found an alteration for the better: this encouraged hint to proceed, and by taking a levii boxes more lie found his appetite .and strefigr-h 'gradually return, and is, now a s healtu arid stoto as ally roan L krupw . You arc welcrinie, Sir, to refer any person to me for a conlirtnition at the ithultr • account it it sittnrici he doubted. • 1 sin, sir, Your obedient humble Fervant, Library, Fulksto .e. • THOS. Vt.:RD.:Y. Prepared arid Sold by the Sole l'nidrietor, Trios. T :Or oa , Memb:r of the RoyahCollege :;urgeoris, London; No. 9, Ncwitridge-strcet,— - Where, after a constant residence of more roan Forty Year;;,, lit a practice • particularly' directed to the Care of Vette ' reel - CoMplaints, soil those incidental to the Parrs of Generation in both sexes; with that inviolable set:l.e.:l which Men of his Protssion .should al ways observe, he flatters himself, the advice and assistan, c .he gratuitous ly. administers to Persons taking this Medicine, will t:a esteemed by a discerning ,as an zdvant4;e seldom to be obtained, and void of ambiguity. Also, sold, by his Appointment, tor the convenience of those living ata distance, at the Perfumer's, No. 35,,5t, ban's-street, Pall Mall; the Toyslihp, No. tai, . Oxford street ; Mr. Disborough's, No. .7,- hsh-street-inlf; Mr. Baxter's" South.bridgecEdinburgh ; Ms. M'Donald'S, G las. gow ; dr. Bull, Dame -street. Dublin ; Mr. Billinee's, Li. verpuol; blr. ...tkinson's, Manchester ; and by One Person in every consideratdc ToWn tr. Great Britain and Ireland, in Boxes of only as. 9d. each, sealed up with full and plain dlreetiOns whereby persons of eit h er ' sex rniy cur.: themselves with:. ease, - Speed, secrecy, and safety. N. 8.. Everyrßox sold in Great Britain is sealed up with a stamp; on which, by favour of the Commissioners, is print. ed at the Stamp-office, " T. Taylor, No. 9, New bridge. street,'' toNitnitate. winch is Felony, and all others are coup"- tertent IYI il .T 1 Sol D • 21 al