The Sun. — London, England, 1810-03-13 00:00:00

Pitt of tlit': ,11111 cif r.rghte, witch was quotcrl T to the speech of the new Teller of the Eecheriti;se i (who was now, standine for Cambridge, and, whom 1 e 0- i' hoped, for the honour Of England,, would net , e..e elereed) which states, e " that noediecussion of ,t.ll, preeeedings of that House shall take p'lace.out of ', l ay. The Honourable Member then meirtioned his _Lt . Navin The L. 1 shewn a summons by Sir Wm. Curtis, ! l ion), though a . Member, he named - as being a etoestitutional and public - man; for - the purpose of rending th e c i t y of L on d on , where the pensiOn of ' t 2901, peeatinurn, welch had peen granted to Lord .7 Ilingion,- was condemned, yet there was no noti c e ;Ken ot th e i r reso l ut i ons ? Shall then the thuzider of . tad e a ll. on an ineignificant -debating s oc i e ty, : . il y ttd. tee c i ty ot London be-disregarded ? As often as , s 'lls Ho.ise endeavours t o re p ress pu bl ic di seuseion it ' t !ver tai come off with credit : in bad Administea- On', the grea t es t conso l at i on the people possess, the lib erty et the press. H e then allueed to G the mischi evous consequences which attended Lord -ortlee measure of excluding strangers troll the parliament of : the House ; and finally recesumended Vrliatuent not tif engage in.foolistesquabble s with ue Vitirig Societies. He believed ;he morteregulat ci qseatild be to proceed by :petition ; b ut h e con tai'ed4avin byrirgovio an amendawmt se That Mr. Gate expressed d ne contr i t i on at the liar of e s House, and .b e i ng i mpr i soned since the 21st of - vek -11,sheuld now be discharged.- - „Tee SPEAKER the n p ut t h e mot i on. • c - 4 :he CHA NCELLOR O f t h e E XCHEQUER could not ' a nctl , &tester in tee motion .ofethe Hon. Baronet, ' l ' l, in the arnendtnent of the Right Hoe. Gentle- e I s ', l alt• Tee ar gum ents of the H on . Baroset removed all 'foutidation for his motion ; the very admission which had been made of the power at the House to e)lntnit any' person_ for contempt of it s aut h or i ty was : viecisi'v e ot. that point. The Right- - Hon. Gentle , ; t S . Who 11101 , ed, - the amen ane nt had stated, that „ eeuld not be ju s t t o nia k e th e person who w as ene objec t of the pre sen t discussion, et martyr to V,,' arguments of the s u pp o rt ers o f t h e pr i v i leges of e'rliarrient, but while th e Ri g h t H on , G ent l eman f il l ? s . tispo se d to uphold' those privileges, i t was not a ' -1 ~ -u lar that h e sh ou ld, i n this particular bike,in wishb a sacrifice of them to b e ma d e by the • Zilses and move to discharge. the person alluded v. It ha r t b e , n •id that th e c a se o f Mr. -Reeves ZaS a grave and serious ca-e, pe r h a p s , b ecause the For the motion — l 4 r t i gtll Honourable Gentl e men hi mse lf, had brought Against it . 153 Majority against if - - - ---- s ue c to tee notice - of the House ; but when other s, PORTUGAL TREATY. t'elelemen. brought charges :affecting the priviegss ,', the House, then they were not. to be treated t On 'cur re-admission to the Gallery, we-thund Q~~hany degree o f sever i ty . Th e Righth mte , Honour- Mr. FuEEmANTLE calling the a ttent i on o f t h e e Genta talked of the House coating ill , House to a paragraph 'contained in some Of theNe efs s t l it of • this case; and that it wa s nu t - cry d e- p apers, which stated that on the numbers - ben ] des t°reus to notice lieeeers -of this sort. Whatever ' dared on the division of Fiidey night reset-x.l[lg the viii be the event of the 'present proceedings, it , Subsidy to Pot tugal, ,M re Croke, the Ministi:rial 48 pretty clear, .fosse -the Right .Hononteel e I Teller had m isse d a b eec h o f t i ends to the Mi n i ster , th e n. tlernan's own sertemetit, that tne House. did i a :: nut less. than 40, and the Opposition Teller (Mr. aease of Mr. R e e ves come ill ote, for the J ur y t o .: „Fre,eiratitle) had n ot corrected t h e error. Mr. F. to m the alleged libel wa s referred .:.eclared onee teir • now appeal e dt e the H ouse w h ei l ier he had not dune be that it was ne lib e l'. If a ny di st i nction was to ' les duty in counting the House; and 'at le tiler the .n. take, : , n t h e two cases , i t was this : that - the . . Hon. Gentl em a n o pp os i te h e d b ut aereed eitte him g oose, in the case of Reeves e would not trust its , in tenoers. . , ° !en teet i ngs, na t urally roused and warmed by tee i - Mr. CROKEn observed, that the H on . G ent l eman. t 4tl eessioned'eloqu e n ce o f t h e Ri g ht H on . G e n t. and , was perfeCtiy correc t i n hit serterneot that tee 1 1 ) erefore sent i t to a J ur y. With respect to what the numbers Were accurately ' coun t e d. W ith respee e ight Hon. Gentleman had urged about not visiting to th paragraph, he certainly should have been -: ellunieer of Parliament upon an insignificant de- ' happy if he could have realized the.expedation held Zthesociety,. be .struhl eeSir e the Hous e t o at t en d - Out , an d h ave asserted mow that theie were 40 the :a" paragtauh i nser t e d at t h e b ottom o f the bill more friends on his side th e H ouse, • b ut the fad which Mr. Jones tees convtated,and there they ", unhappily was not so. 1.0 ltrsee a most gross libel, tending to bring P ar - • SCHELDT INQUIRY. - 117illent into contempt,- and subversive of all those Lord PORCHESTER gave.notice, that as it was pro e eleples which' th e Bel o f Ri g h ts was i nten d ed to bable the Inquiry would close this day, he would on ' 'd. In d laving a co3;parison be tw e en the for- : thi s d a y f ortn i g h t b r i ng f orward some resolutions aranee of th e HouSe,in not noticing the conduct of upon the subject. . . ;.`l6 Curporauon of London, he conceived iteWas wise ' FOREIGN SLAVE TRADE. • - ~"11.1.e Huh:o so to abstain, for the Corporation were Mr. BROUGHAM moved for certain papers respea - - :bsetebled in a legal form, and had the. right to corn- ing the, Foreign Slave Trade. The ~ objea which , 4 ent n o its procesdingss bst ;you'd- the Right Han. the 'Hon. Gentleman had in view, was to' ascertain tale tan-end - that "a spouting club was en- i what - proceedings had beer adopted lestween . _ our d to pass a grtiss, censure, upon the Legislative ' Government and the States of Sweden, Portugal,. . e e s setuoly unnoticed and . unpuniseed ?. Tee C or - , an d Spain, upon the ~ ü bjeA W of the _Aboliti on . ith ofr:it!on of Loud e n- had a legitimate objet in View ; • r e sp e tt t o t h e first of thg'se Powers; not w ith stan di ng t Ito with th e Briti s h 'Forum or any of those sort ". the terms of alli ance which governed the intercctese % speaking societies; The Right Honourable : between the. two States, and the Resolution of 1807, t e ntleman tepid not agree . to the ansendtrient, : fop abolishing the tragic in slaves, which 'made it Il c attse it would Sit aside ehate'resped which the ' itn.erative on the Government to consult with lo - Ouse owed it - Self. There was no install - Le to be I reign Stites upon the po:icy and humanity of fore ee,i‘tod upon record in Which an individeal commit- going that inbutpan traffic, yet -it was still carried fOr _an offence Was released; without peti- : on. The House must be apprised that the colonisl toningA; to be'discharged. He. trusted the HoUse 1 possessions of Sweden were of no importairce..The 41 °tIld pairse befote they couseeted to, the amend,- ! small island of St. Bertholornew constituted the t C ult, and not for the first time make. a precedent. I whole of their poss4ssion3, and conseivently the heY. th e f orms Of the HouSe, they could not av a il I tra ffi c must b e sma I. Notwithstanding 'this, how-, tnielve s of the admission or error of Mr. Junes, I ever, the traffic was cart ied on _under the- Swedish we Must make some, s ub s e quent a l oneineie , an d lie : flag to egre a t extent, principally, as he understooct, l(1 hot think,. th e y wou ld b e indiSp6sl to listen t o for British . benefit With respeet to Portug a l h e , old petition. All that they, had in view was b y ' -had understood l som a G overnor o f one of their set r 4 ishing t o f oun d an example'; but if 'the indivi- dements, when he w a s a t Li s b on , t h at upwards oaf 4 : 41 now b e f ore t h e 'H ouse should be so ill-advised ' 15,000 negroes were imported an nua lly f rom t h e , ) 1 tr ot properly to d e m ean - himse lf ( w hi c h h owever Portuguese settlements to America, and that the . cli c ' was not disp ese d to t hi n k was the.case, for he -Spanish trade was gr e at. .The Hon. Gentle man doper for. know it to b e so), the House would ha ve a next a d verted to the AmeriCan trade, and obser ve d, 'oeer respell for its own dignity. • - I that an 'agreement upon that subjed had been en- Mr. 4 SHERMAN, in - explanati on , w i s h e d to core eered into, as he un d ers t oo d, .withi Mr. Erskine, for I t t. t the Rigte Hon. Gentleman.. In th e case of Mr. so he gathe re d t ro th t h e d ocuments on the table, for f tees, so tar from th e H ouse not trust i ng i ts own the abolition of the traffic. After apologising to the Zl" cl ings, and. passing a t e opinion 'upon the book in House foreroubling them on t he subje.d, he moved., estion, they did declare, in the strongest manner, "An humble Address to his Majesty for copies of e ' a t it was a fhlse, scandalous, and malicious libel. , all communications made by the Secretary of State :lEarl TEMPLE would not ob . Vet to the petition of to the Foreign Ministers resident, here, since 1806, t - zones, if .he sn o pld present one to - morrow, for ' on the subject of the Aboliti o n of the Sieve Trade." ne tinie welch heliatleufferedimprisontnenewas, hd Mr. CANNING seconded the motion. With re-` co nceived, a. sufficient punishment for the offer e. sped to the aside, the Hon. Getitleman had only he Earl couldnot consent to discharge Iran, I stated, that this country being on terms of amity i hill lie lurid expressed contrition in the regular Way. with Se eden, Portugal and Spain, had mad e repre thth resped to the allusion that had been made to' ► . sentations for the abolition.. - When the papers were' e clause in th e Bill o f Ri g h ts , b e h a d to observe; on the table, the H o u se would see- that the m os t that- 1 r tie clause was leg a lly . an d const i tut i onally : anxious representation s h a d b een ma d e t o P ortug a l, r iirecf. He onsiderece diet the Corporation of Lon- , and to the Gover nment at th e B raz il s, to concur iii olts and ied ee d o f any C ity p roperly convened, had the entire abolition of the Slave Trade. Although f e right o r expr e ih i ng t hei r opinions olthe cooduel - tLat wish was most s t rong ly expresse d, an d al their leprescutatireS. . - , though our situation wish Portugal gave th e r i g ht - he Mr. IN lieretteeo was of opinion 114 f. Juties had ' to express that desire, yet his Majesty's-Government; ti " 1 imprisoned long enough, it w a s not necessary '.eoaltl not .hold out th e eight of .complete dict a ti on , tl li t the Honse-for .its- own dignity stioel l d continue Mir could 'it; on the other h an d, b e cons id ere d as :Term of that irrprisonifitnt.. He- ho'wer er could - the want bi zeal in the f ore i gn P owers , if in, the a t t vote for the - Hen. ,Baronet's triotion, and was space of te`elve months -they had not acconipliseed 11 ( " t rY that he had broogct it forward in such a shape what it cost- some of the , ablest men- in this co u n tr y xi 4 t It was inVOSS:bli: io :,eci,le - upon it ; the House I twenty years to accomplish. ' The treaty made e! )d oubtectly has th e P.eser of comniittid g to p r is on i w i th the Government of the Brazils would be found i:Jr contempe but in sortie cases such contemp t night '.; mole effectual than the'Ainerica n T reat y, w hi c h • . :Is i. e indiscreet. - .1 - 1 - Ilionelit' witlthis_ Right-Hen s 'not retsfied. As to the Spa n i s h part ot the clues- ' end (Mr. Sheridan) that the Muse wetild . nor . Lion, the lion. Gentleman perhees bed no t over , . cetne Kit clear, but. at,4he s tirce could - not vote in the aflirmatiVe . of• the proi.oiitiOn Of the Hcn. Baronet. Mr. C. WYNNE was ready to admit that in of fences of this kind, the House should set bounds.to their punishment. At the same time ,he. thought • that as there was no precedent for the amendment, and as it was necessary the. pa-Frson should express his contrition by petition the best mode would be•to ne gative the arnendatedt. Sir FRANCIS BURDETT replied at some length to the arguments ;sod cases which hadbeen' brought f6rward in opposition to . him. The Hon..Barenet had never meant to contend th a t the .House had not the power to commit for contempt, but he had cis tinellv admitted that power when . eonfin,d tO the re moval.of obstra.aion: to its judicialproeeedings ; that wai the legal meaning .of .the word ",contempt.7 Further than that he,could not go, he denied the right ()leaning persons to the Bar, making them convia themselves, and then sending theca to - Newgate. The Hon Baronet noticed all the arguments opposed to, hint, -and stated that his unvarying principle had been to resist arbitrary authority come irons what quarter it rn;ght, that the orders of the House were not legally binding Upon the subject, whO ,for any infringement of them was-amena oale only to- .Court cf Jud cature. The law as defined was What he desired ; That law which stiipped the high fiying wings- of the - prerogative of the Crown. There was no n e isure of punishment f u r offendi ng aga i nst Parliament, they might be' committed to prison for five minute; only, or the iinprisonntent • might last for seven. years, because, in the former instance, : a dissolution of Parliament might take place ; and in the , otter, fro'm a feeling of great injury, a person so' Committed might. not cliuse to petition., The Lex Purliamentoram was in that case a hardship on the subjeet. Magna Charta was the law of the land,. and, there could not be two laws.. • With respect to the dignity of Parliament, about which so much had been said, Why if dignity was to Le estimated by by the severity of the punishment, Jack Ketch wool . be the most dignified executioner of punish= . ments in existence. The amendment of Mr. SHERIDAN was then pot and negatived; and the Gallery was cleared for a di idsioil upon tile original motion of Sir ntANcia BURDETT. . . . - • • , e. ,!' ', •t. i • ' . •1 • - stated it. On the abbjea of the.Alaolition ,b Sure- t fee 'General TART_ ETON Vii3llo. tO ail; the Right Ho _.. , . , clii, he was ;afiaid no return Could:be made -'He l. noirable Gentleman on:the other:side of' tbe, Honse Was not aPPrized until very lately, that the Swedish whit the pay of Cue 'Portuguese. troops-taken into our flig had been lent to cover the illicit trade •in slaves, t Service Was to be ? Was . it to be exaclly si m il ar to but it was' most ce r t a i n l y true as stated by the Hon. that of the. British troctin of the bin: ?, •' . , ' . Gentletnao that the flag was prostituted .to those • The CHANCELLOR Of the EXCHEQUER'XeI4i,,dth* purposes. Some means must be devised to.preyein ..there teould be no great difference, and that it would British subjects from- still continuing under neutral ibe somewhat less. ' - • • :fiag• thik disgraceful tratfle.. As to the American . . , • PQR TUC AL, , Government, he did most firmly believe that they I the CHANCELLOR of the .EKCITEQUER triove.l the lent their fl?,gs,- and he did not know it could _be ; Order of the Day for rece;vinge toe 'Report. of ihe COmtuittee of Supply. 1, 7' '7 ' ' . ' - , aVoicled,:;: for - their shores. contained _the greatest. i slave population ; an . d - whether they could be in- 1 General TARLETON and Sir - T. Maros objeeted to, ducted to consent to an agreement binding them to the - motion at sOlate an - hour . . ' • . the Aboliiion, it- was dilliallt to conjeclore. The 1 • M. W. SMITH moved an immediate adjournment Hon. Gentleman, however, was mistaken; in sup- ipt • the House.' . . . ..The Gallery' was cleared, but no division took posing there was any 'agreement between this coup- I try- and America. He had'nOt read the papers ac.- pl ace . e . curatcly. It was i m p oss ibl e t o i nterfere without a On.our re -admission to the G rilery. 'we foetid Sir co:111)nd, and they had_certain view of national in- T.TURTON expostulating at great length onr tf,.. im deFendence, which ill i-Cceorded with e speculaiir,e no- providence i of the bargain made . by our Government. Botts of humanity ; besides,' there would be great i with the Portuguese troops. The H. i -.eic oe • e es del eacy in the question. . Supposing the Admiralty followed on the same side - by Gen. TARLETON.; were to•-"give direetions to our crutzers,' to stop any • Mr. ADDINGTON approved of th e grant . .. ship which hada black rum on boa l, d, under the idea that ‘ Mr. WHITBRE AD w i s h e d t o ask why the intinter-:she was engag e d io the trade, the ord e rs might mediate dispatches froth Mr. Villiers were be destru6t ve,. tor the ;americans;americanswobld let loose ducted ? pro sWartn of p r i vateers on .?brie trade which mi ght in What force might be exp e ct e d to eo-upe-„ . , rate I,vith ours- in P o rtu g al? W hat Was to be• the ‘- uce volve serioui consequences. pay of the. Portuguese troops ? What ,was to be , Mi. STEE:VEN believed that. the Anletican Go- done with them in the event of a reverse ? &c. &e. vernal= were - sincere in their intentions of abo- The CHANCEELOR of the EXCHEQUER accounted itshing the trade, although their might be indivi- , for the absence of the diipatches, It would not be duals in that cauntry not dtposed to second their well to ,give the country the . means of knowing the, intentions. He 'stated several cases in which the exa6t-amotrot of Llle forCC they - would have to 'meet. Governmer,t• of the United States hi,d di•*t . inetly With respe& to the future diposal of the' Porpi shewn that they were i n earnest, on this subjeae-e, • gnese troops, • that qUestion timeand-circomstarices He thought that each nation might authollse the . atone could answer. • 1 other to enforce the prohibitory laws (4 both ; but Mr. W. SmiTH thought it a hopeless contest, and admitted that tbis.Must be, by - express cock that to make the' grant would be to squander our Mr. BaouGnAm defended the American Govern- I treasure to no purpose. He thought the question, ment fro:n the charge of the Right Hon. (30otle- ‘f What.was to be the future dispo.al of the troo ! , s ?" man, who imputed to them a disposiiio;l to swindle of . g'rett imPbrtance. Did Ministers mean to keep, a liote:Sia.ve Trade for. themselves out of the ano;i- ; tr,lnspoi:ts at C . idiz A.vaiting to . bring them away ? Lion by Great 13ritiiin. supeorted th e mot i on. ! Mr. BARH Ai so . , he should lie to know What expense wou ld AM be incurred by keeping; transport s i n requ i s i t i on for :MT. VNT.tentotroace expressed the satisfiao io ; e, 0,000 Men. One _ quest i o n t h at had been .put to that he felt at lindittg. that ther w n e as but one opii• him tire Chancellor of the Exchequer had not an ar ou with r-.2spLltt to the expedience,' of carrying the swered at . 311, respeeting the pay of (he Portuguese abolition' into complete elf,,i6t. He though t the fOrce. Incidental expellees would, he thought, Right Hon. Gentleman opposite had . been rather most enormously swell the burden. tie fiir iu his esiiioate of the views anit cooduci of Mr. WHITBREAD inquired as to the expencei in. . .. the zlauericein Government on this Mr. 'rlie currectby (loathing. . . AnteTicaas had done more than 'ui; for not in Penn- The CHANCELLOR of the Excn/tQuER7 stited • +<3l ~n a alone, but in the greater part of Virginia, s o8(Y,0001. to .be the whole of the expenc:?.s thL.:Eng. • they had eve n tin 'uciputect the it siav:2A.. ' lish Governmar, to;)1i. upon•thenistlve,.. . . . -The motion tva; then put and k!grced to. Mr. SHERIDAN rleVer rerne:tibered a question on liNcily.f.2tlEß BILLS. . . .which he I, , ters less dispased . to give a silent.vo . te. He . . On the Order-of the Day for the Ijl . )Use to' re, however had takenno part in the debate,- nOr was• iolve its !f intO a Cortnuitm;-!, - 6( Ways, and Means it his intention to i:ike any, as onrte early day (next be n% moved by th e CHANCELLo of 'the_ Lx-, Mon lay he th in:ll4 l u ) lie wf:,u;d "submit a di,tinat 0ir,....,,,, .• . ~ i o ,tion. to tlw -- .1.-10:1'se. on z irie - coiiXna - or hi , Ma , . Lord PoßcursTror, observing that a g,reat number ' jestv's Ministers i.vi. Li respect to.the Penittorld. ' of witnesses were in attendance . to be examined in 'The several Resolutions Were then ' s. ut ;Ind car the Conitnittee on the Expedition. to the Seheldt, rigid, The I - louse 'resumed,, and the e Jrt was suge;est:, ; d tire •postponetnent .o' the Conimittee of • twtiugh! up .3nd. agreed to.- e , Ways and INl.,:ne .. , . Lard CASTLEREAGrI tlietl M0V,(.1 lOC (../tder of the The Cu .11, cELLoa 'of !he Excli:OLlP.li replied; ,pv for going' tract, tie Gotnwittee on the Expedi t hat the itroposicott which ite had ic, ctrl clie in the ; tion to the Scheldt. Committee, although import:let, • weot net novel, and, ,in - his opinion, could oot occasion utue:i dis cu,sipn... .. WALCIILREN EXP [AA The -House. then - resole, - (1 itself into the C./m - 4- , mntee, acid straners were •perrnitted to remain in Galery.- Mr. WHARTON was EXafilitiej 'in his place, by Lord .Castlereagh, as to .the expent:es conseqUenCee of the late E'xpedwon.—Mr. .r ton stated .the total amount of the ex.traordii, pence& to be 834,2701. las. 7d. of wbio-4.2 IS. '7d. was incurred after the evacuation of .South 4eveland. Mr. WHITBREAD wished, to know if 1:c could. vouch for the - accuracy of the, accounts, en the faith of which he made the statement, Mr. WHARTON replied, that the returns had been made pursuant to an order given from the different departmots, each signed by the proper officer. He could only.speak to. their truth from the reliance he had on the officers. Mr. CROKER stated, that he had-a small item to' ray before the 'House, which had been. placed• friindep. the head offcontingent exi-ences, .and whia was for sums paid to Officers as compensation for ex pences they had sustained through being obliged to entertain persons at their table. The account wothd. have been laid on the table befoie, but the Chief Clerk was ill and out of town, and he only could make up the account corre;itly, as the money had been paid by him. He (Mr. Croker) had had a private a.ccount made outifor himself, from tyhich he could state the amount of the sum to be about 10' or .11,0001. • The House then resolved itself into the Com mittee. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER rose to submit to the Committee a resolution &i.tuilar to that of the last y ear . I t was to o,:enik the finding of eight Millions of Exchequer silia, beariu tteb.:- tween 20th &b. 109 and t 6th March, 1 . 810. He observed that there *ere two descriptions of Bills, those,bearing an interest of three-pence - hzdfpenny a day, and those tiearing an interest of three-pence fart fling. He meant to give the holders of the first description the opportunity of 'funding between the 20th i.nci 27th of March, and to the holders of the hitter clertption the opportunity of funding between the '22.d and 27th . of March; thus making a differ- . .ence of two days in that respect. He should pro p6se thateach person holding Exchequer Bills should be permitted to fund them at the rate of t031.-as.' per cent.. in the Navy 5 Per cents. •The interest to run-up to the gth of April, tint days longer than op the last occasion, jc t order that the act having 17assed, and the certificates having been issued, no . , interval should takeplace between the ceasing of interest and the funding of the Bills. He conclud ed by moving several resolutions correspondent to statement. Mr. BARING objected to the StOck in which these Bills were to, be funded, Me. HosKtssoN defended the Stock, as the most eligible; at a future opportunity it might be re duce I. •, Mr. PARNELL remarked, that the recent financial observations of the Hon. Gentleman himself did not afford much hope of such an event. Sir J. NEWPORT disliked any mode by which competition was excluded, and the Publ:c kept in ignorance as to the lowest terms of interest on which money can be procured. The CHANCELLOR of the :EXCHEQUER defended the expediency of allowing the Bills to be funded in the five per cents.; and contended that in the event of a cessation-of taxation and loans, there was every reason to believe that the eration of the Sinking Fund would create such a rise in the price of the Stocks, as to render this choice available to the pnb lie interest. The House was then resumed, the Chairthan reported progress, 'and obtained leave to sit again this day. The accounts of the expences ; incurred id the Ex pedition were then brought up and laid on the table, as was an estimate of The. expences of the ,Barrack Department. • Lord CASTLEREAGH moved for a letter from self to Lord Chatham, dated August 1, t 8 . 09, v. fill its inclosure, as far as the same might be produce.", without inconvenience to the Public. The, Mutiny, Bill was read a third time and passed. . • The other Orders of the Day were disposed of, and the House adjourned at Thiee o'clock this morning. • Mr. flottNEß deprecated the great increase of un funded debt.. He attributed , the present price. of. Stocks to the dtsengagement of capital trorn foreign commerce. Late MILITARY DISTURBANCES in INDIA. • Mr. Rosa denied that-so much capital had been withdrawn from our foreign commerce,- which, he contended, was one-third more exwnsive than at any former period. The resolutions were then :agreed to, and the Report was Ordered to be received to-morrow. A long and deiultory conversation ensued on the propriety of entering into the consideration of the Ordnance: Eititna:eS, or proceeding with the \Val, cheren I (lniry at that. Late hour -(twelve o'clock). — It ryas at agreed-that the Inquiry should pro ceed on Tucsd :y. Thursday, and (if necessary to its completion} Friday, to commence each day at fire o'clock. The consideration of the O r d nance Esti mates was fixed, for Wednesday, and Mr. .13 - .l.;ixs postponed his motion, which stood for Thursday, to next week, GENERAL. ORDERS. BEAD-QUARTERS OF THE' ARMY, - CHOULTRY SEPT. 26,. 180 . 9. • The Right Hon. the Covernor.:`C,'-eherar hving addressed the subjoined Orde - rs to Major-General GOworz, commanc ing the Army, to be published to the Army, they are ac: cordingly published in Military. Orders. Fort St. George,. Sept. Co). G. 0. By the Rijjlzt Hon. the Governor-. General. On my utrival at Fort St., Peoige I learnt that Several hopor s tant changes had taken. place in the arThirs of this Presidency, si.ibecioent to-the eveots which had come to my knowledge at the period of my departure from.Pengal.. The - first ad of open revolt which had alreadk been committed by the Garrison of Alaiulipataria, had been followed by proceedings not leis ethnical Ir. ai )t. ‘"Ak ~..