The Sun. — London, England, 1818-03-11 00:00:00

bit'able to the Monopoly witich the great hirewirs have es' a bliShed. 9. That this Monopoly is produced and upheld by the un constitutional' poWer given to Justices of the Peace, in their . respective localities, to prevent any persohs from vending • beer excepting end) persons and in such houses as they please; a power which being subject to no human control, and being exercised in many instances by needy or avaricious Torn, is naturally applied by them in pkaventing competition in trades in' which they or their friends or patrons are in terested. • In. That a delire to prevent an unnecessary number_ of the reason generally assigned for refusing permission. to epos houses, built for public-houses, where the et:asonable saants athe publ4yee t taire then, insincere; be attse the shine -licensers-grant licences - to public-houses in• 'clusters where the interest of their friends is thereby upheld, although such houses can only be supported by allowing 01141 _ encouraging bad practices. I I. That the similar pretence, that competition is prevent ed in order that the laridlords of the favoured_ houses may fleurish, and not he induced .through necessity to suffer this orderly.conduct - oo then' premises, is equille'fallaciimi; be cause the ownersof -- the favoured houses, who are generally brewers or spirit-dealers, always requite premiums of their tenants, equal to the value of the Monopoly to them, or an additional rent, thus keeping the tenants profits dea; how:. ever valuable, the , license :nay he to the principal. 12. "chat the stippositiosi of correcting the licentiousness encouraged at• some public-limises by 'denying , licenses for others,ls out). calculated to benefit the Monopoly System; it . being evident, in principle, that men will not drink less of be less d""rdevi' . . "hel dt , mll text:tiller is onehouse than they would be if diss:iled among two or three ; and notorious in - practice that some of the houses which valiantly! a superior ''share of cu tom and profit, are among. those which are most injurious to the . public.health and morals. 13. 'that suck is the valtie, however, of the prohillifitin of . competition., that thousands of inntini9 are frequently given for the eonsitleetvion of a license to a house, in other words, fur permission to tr.:ele, a hich expence, together with the extra profits secured by ; the• Monopoly, hill upon the con tainers, and hecunie a grievous burtlien to the lower classes of the counonnity. ' - - 14. that it is unreasonable to invest Justitats of the Peace with the right of issuing exclosiye Tioa'ees for trading in vie- . thals„when the issuing of such powers by the Sovereign him self is declared to'he void iii saw., k% That itis eqoalky unreasonah!e to ainhorize the said . Jitetices " dissent• men of their ti!ierties and ft re outruns," at their own will and plraytnr, withont tieing accountahle to any bonsai) beieg,, thut King, on his throne. is. intCr clic'ed from " hurting or injuring" pie nieattest subject, on less by due eeurse of tau'; and is answerable fur hiss acts in the persetil of his Ministers. IG. That these extraordinary and unconstitutional power.; evea.in the purest hauds, are wholly ineificicet for the object of keeping victualling' houses its good orders because they are Only in action out otie day in the year, when punishment, as regards the etast, is easilyarofrid of-by shifting-the tenant, and as regards the figure, .it is as impossible for the licenser's to know that suet, houses as they patronize will•be .Well con- . eincted, as it is that those which they refuse to licence would , be di sorties t'. 17. That it-is therefore_ qually in rain to expect an effec titaC over public -houses, .or a, termination of the' wrotigs'infi eted on - the owners elf houses, on victuallers, avid . on the public at large, under the pre'sein, liecusirosystein—a system which is ,proved to be all-impotent for good purposes, and all powerful for bad ones—erecting a despotic control over the comforts, the property, and the rights of the subject, which is anomalous in the conStitutissiial gove.rument of this country, and which is believed to be tiuknown in' any other. . is. That-to prilAnce a 'remedy, it'is necessary forThe•Magis trates' power to be removed frourthe patronage of the trade of victualling, to the correction of the disorders which some times arise outof it—from the exercise of • their own uncon trollable wills, to the administration legislative rules equaly applicable-and extending to ali, and in which the penalties are proportioned to the offences, and arc operative imme diately. _ to. That in as far as it is deemed expedient to restrict .t lie number of public-houses, that 'end v ill lie most fairly and beneficiallyaccOmplished by _imposing a large duty ori th,e li cense to open any new horse, thus divert in:; the value of the eestriction'from the pockets of the license - jobbers to the use's of the State, -- 2Q. That with a largc'duty imposed.on leave to open a new house, and Inci weans provided-for immediately stopping a trade — conducted in a disorderly manner, no person would • risk the 'capital necessary to establish a new trade., unless he ,could do it upon. safe grounds, and therefore' no good reason can be advanced .agaiost restoring to the public the benefit of a free cOmpetition, and to victualleis the, common rights of_their cimutt - ymen—namely, the liberty to carry 011 their trade in such places as they and most'Eligible (not being lo cally offensive), and to purchase their goods of such manu facturers as offer to supply them oo the best Your-Petitioners itutUbly submit the above propositions to the wisdom and paternal care of your Houourable House, in. the hope that your- Honourable House thav restore to the' public generally the righ t of a free trade in !seer, and to the eietnAler iii particular the pi-otection of the bias, instead of the - wills of itidividuals, subject to sue', • legislative ,regula tions for the trade as shall be deemed conducive to the public welfare. And your Petitioners will cser pray, &c. Mr. BARCLAY claimed the attention of the House, while he answered the petition which had been presented by 'a statement of facts. He could have wished some of his Majesty's Minis ters to be present to hear the explanation he was 'anxious to offer. Though 'the question was one which deeply affected the Brewers awl a large body of respectable men who were connected with them, y et he considered it to be 41W one in which all the Members of that House must take a lively interest, and Ministers were hound to give their • atteution to. that (torn neatly a fiftieth part of the whole revenue of the - country was derived, namely, the snot 01 900,0001: Ile wished to make souse observations on the manner.in which this petition had been produced. The 1-I( . moncable Member then gave the history of the publication' of Mr. Beaumont's Resolutions in the Newspapers, the substance of which were embodied in the pre sent petition, and of the- meeting subsequently called totake them into consideration at tbeCrown and Anchor. At that meeting,which he had under stood was nut very numerous, those Resolutions woe proposed and of course passed unanimously. lit such an assembly, it was impossible to suppose that any person who might speak on behalf ofthe brewers could,obtain, a fair bedring. This was not, to be expected, after the Chairman, in opening the bu siness, had pronounced .t he bitterest - Thillippic that could issue from the lips of matt,•'against a class of persons of whose conduct he • cituld positively know nothing... The Resoltitions of the Meeting were published in all the Pape rs, and after a sufficient time bad elapsed, this petition was produced. Qt' this he had only to say, that large as-it was, he Was astonished that it had tiot double and treble the number of signatures attached to it, that had actually been procured. He had expected mute, as ; he knew that the petition. had been left in sh o ps, tvhere those who went in were requested to sign it : and this had been done not only in the city, but in the environs, while men were sent about bearing large boards, inviting the public to it, and inscribed ''a tree trade and a fair trial„" 'Mr. Be.aumont, after the Meeting, had published his speech, which he (Mr. Barclay) now held in his hand, and to which he should presently have occasion to refer. He should - first eply to what was said of the Monopoly of the eleven London Brewers, for against theth the charge was directed, as there was a marked dis tinction between these and the brewers' in the country . , though the latter had public-houses of their own. as , well 'as. the Brew:rs' iu tow n . ihe Metropolis there were three breweries which brewed more than half of the beer con -111114-'d. Now, what bad beeu proved in cvi . ,~;:. &env: ? Why, that Oa of flat futAit-!tonnes sery • ed by the concern with which he Was connected, one in eight had been purchased by the Brewer. The proportion of those in the same siitrdtinn svhich were served from the Brewery. of Whit bread and Co. was-one to seven. In short,. out of the whole•—•out of about two thousand public houses in the - Metropolis, there might he two or three hundred in the hands of Brewers. A certain number of houses that had-not been pur chased were filled' by persons who had received loans fro m th e B re w. ems , for it was the practice-of all of thenm ti) lend stuns in this way;On the lease of the house. These, however, were not bound to the breweries, with which they were thus con nected, as. if they should find . - 'the article with which they were screed such as the public did not like, they could pay theabortey that had 'been advanced - to them,,• •atoi go elsewhere, Be tween -two and three hundrad persons he kn e w had.thai changed in the course of last - year.- He meaot such a number had come to -the house with which lie teas coonected. or_ gone from it tinder such circumstance's. Now it was said, that by the loans dots advaaCeal, the capital laic! oust by the brewers .was increased that the public were in consequence charged more. for • their porter than they would otherwiSe have to pay. He could however assert, that if the brewers put but .the t welfth part of a . halt.- penny on each pot of heir they sold, it would pay' them beyond their Most sanguine exoectatioas for all the money they had-lint-ill the• way he had mentioned.. Jr. was tiotrefare that . if this practice were discontinued, the public could not lave their port - & •a cheaper fa) e. lint. then it' Would they might leave tit better. He would leave the Honse . to conceive how much better could be made for the twelfth part'of a halfpenny, or theone hundred -and fort y-foUrth part of the, price of a.pot of porter, From this statement he thought it would be seen, that . from discOntinuing the practice of lending money to publicans, the public could not have their porter either cheaper or better, and that by keeping up the practice, a considerable number of.individuals in humble circumstances were materially benefited wlole the public at largesustained noinjury. Now, on the price of pot ter,te would again. refer to the Report, of the Police Committee. Thechairman of that Committee had investigated the subject with much industry, he (Mr. Barclay s ) had given hint all.the information is his power. , What was the result as to the exorbitant increase; of pike alleged to have taken place i. Why, it appeared that 30 or 40 years back porter bad hi-en sold for three-pence halfpenny per pot. The GovernMent had made such an addition to the duties paid on it, as raised it to tporpence, and the increase which bad taken place on the raw materials from which it was made, was so great, that the House must see there, was not the shadow of a foun dation for the charge pref erred against , them in this' respect. This he proceeded to spew by a comparative ,statement of ~ the prices of malt and hops at different periods, which be asserted to 'have been incorrectly toot tal by Mr. , Beaumont. That Ge4tleman had said the porter had risen a halfpenny %Theo the price of malt and hops had been reduced, and it had declined when they had risen': - This had oc curred at the periods' alluded to, but it . was the, laying on,artol. the taking off the Waoltlait Duty that had caused the variations of price which had . been noticed. Such Were the grounds on which Mr. Bramooot had moved for a vote -of censure against the Brewers. But Mr. B. had accused them of raising the pt ice of , porter whet; their stock in band could not have been affectet(by the advance which had' taken place in the prices of malt,and hops. He would asset t, without fear of contra diction, that the patine had participated in the _benefits afforded by the stock in hand. They must have paid a higher price all last year than they had pUid if the stock on hand had not pre-. vented a larger augmentution of the charge than had actually taken place. This would be under stood when he stated the price formerly paid for malt to be G4s. including the war duty ; the price now 'laid for it without the war malt duty was 83s. But one of the Breweries haul, in de ference to the sense of the public, its manifested at the Crown and Anchor meeting, reduced • the price ot its porter. He-had a little history to give the House on the subject of this• Brewery. This was 4. public Brewery which had been raised by subscription shares. 11 might be supposed that such a Breteery could afford'to sell cheaper than any other, as people who embarked their money in such concerto; were tvell satisfied to receive five per cent. interest; hot those who traded .in• a re gular way haul a right to endeavour to gain some thing more; But what would the Idolise say when they were told that this patriotic concern had not . paid the shareholders any interest at all ,for some years ?• By subscriptiOn shares the stunt of 350,000/.lrad been raised to establish the Brewery, and now the shares were selling at such a price in the market, that it might be said all tbeir capital hadbeethlost , ,,but , about 100,0001. They, 4ltere fore, acting:thus, could sell at a rate tiVat WO - other e.wery could think of selling at. ' , Besides time Brewery he „bad' mentioned; there were pnblichns in various parts of the metropolis Who sold . a penny tinder the market price. But he had never heard of any persons doing this who did not mix water or table beer with their porter; and he knew many instances of. houses who sad under price havingbeen refused porter front the Breviery he was ionnected,with, becanse they were certain, if sold to them, it would be mixed. lie denied that there was 'any combination ,of the great - Brewers against the interests of the Public. It was owing to them that the price of - Porter had not been oftener rai'ed, and they had lowered it when the small Breweries would never have . thought of doing such a thing. It avas said that porter was not made front malt and hops. This charge, too, was made without ti 'shadow of fouridation. He could answer for one house that. it was untrue, and he was convinced as Much might be•said for all the rest. If the Brewers of London were to use any deleterious ingredients, they must be supplied with them by cart-loads. These must he brought in before all the people in their service, and also before the Officers of the Government, who were always about Their ['Uses. Could it tlieu be tbouglit such an attempt would be made, woven in all probability ruin must be the Cenfseettiene An infaMotts - report •%liic:l had been set on -lout respecting , a ieizure said .to have been made at the breWhouse 'to which he be longed, had made such an impression, _that for some days afterwards the pUblicans were 'COn stantly coming down to entreat that the state- . went be contradicted, As till this Wa s d one they could not sell a single barrel of beer. He would ask the House then, if it were ithely that they should risk their reputation and fortunes by prac tices, like .those imputed so them ? But it was said a free trade was wished fin., The brewers wished for this as 'much as others could do, and their exertionslad been directed to make it so, as far as depended upon them, and he thought they bad succeeded to a great degree. As to the plan for allowing any person to -ommence victualler at his pleasure, tbongh his •own individual interest might be promoted by it, he could no:- but remind the House f•hat there was a large, body of men • whose interests this would greatly affect, and who were •etititled to protection—be meant the publicans. The , value of the leases of those Who dealt one particular house, be believed to amount to about 500,0001. 'lhat property ought not to be invaded without the fullest inquiry, and lie therefore called upon the- Honse to giVe the subject their most serious attention hettire they thought of taking a step of that kind, lie trusted he bad said etiough to convince the House that no monopoly - ; inintions to the • interests of the public, existed, so far - as the brewers were con cerned, and that it was owing to the great brew eries in the metropolis that the price of porter had been -kept so, low. He knew nothing AA Air. Beaumont, but he had felt himself bound" ci prove, that the charges -he bad hrOught forward were un toonded. • ‘:; Mr. DICKINSON said that much inconvenience would occur, if certain Private Bills before the House were not passed this evening while the Lords were sitting. He therefore won't! move, that the debate on the pet itiun should be adjourned till to-morrow. Mr. W. SMITH was inclined to differ altogether from the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Bare but he consented' o the proposed adiottrpment of the bate. Ile wished the petition referred to a Com mittee. - Mr. CALVERT bowed to thewish . of the House for the proposed . adjournment: In hislile he had never heard imputations more false-than were cOn 7 tained in thiS petition. He hoped a. committee „would he.appilinted to inquire into the merits of the case. This to hint appeared necessary, for the sat►sfaction of the public, and for the public peace. Tbe debate was then adjourned till tp-morrow: • (For the Remainder of the Proceedings in the House of Cominoni, see. the l i ast Page.) LAW IN I'ELLIGENCE. COURT OF CIIANCFRY, MAnen , THE FIiINCESS OF WALES V. THE EMIL OF LIVER- POOL AND COUNT MUNSTFR. The LoaD CHANCELLOR thiS motrring triok a general review : of the circumstances of this 'case,. which we reported, on Monday. Ills Lordship tibsorvell, that according to the established general* rules of the, Court; the 'defendants should 'file Cross bill, in Order to have 'a discovet y Of',the itt strumeot which 'they desired to be pro‘luced but where justice required that the ordinary role should be departed friim, it ‘u.as requisite that 'he affidavit* of the puty applyink r for a particular favour from the Court, should State fully the ne cessity which existed for granting it. its the pre sent case, the ifslttvit of Count Minister states only, that' be is apprized, and verily believes, that tht-proditetion of the instrument is question 'nay afford, trrtiterial infot tnation. In order to shape an answer properly- to the hill against them, as one Of the/executors strider the will of his Royal High ness the late Duke of 4rtins wick , stronget grounds than one, restiuvott a Mere . contingency, should be stated', in .ordev to, call for the production the instrument referred to ; and, theiefore, if a sufficient reason Was not brouOtt forward by next Saturday, fur-the producing of the instrument, be should then dismiss the motion. Froin the LONDON GAZETTE, MARCH 10. BANKRUPTCIES ENLARGED. James Cheet ham, Oldham, Lancashire, shoemaker, (rain March 23, to April G. Smian hose, Swansea, GlamOiganslifrO, dealer, from Mkirch 21, to April 10. • - BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED. .T.llurges 13ndgett,_Stoke• lane, Sornersetshire, brewer. %V. Norton ;Marsden, Satforn, Lancashire, corn-dealer. BANK RUM'S. E. Smitten; Fox and Knot-yard, Snow-hill; dealer, March 14, 28, and April 21, at ten,, at Guildhall. Atturncy, Alt% .W. Drykes, Thavirs's- inn; ' C. T. Cracklow, White I.iop-street, Spitalficlds,..marble , mer. chant, March 14, 28 - ,• and April 21, at ten, at Guildhal. Attorney, Mr. Castle, 4,;‘,lrsitor-street, Chaticeiy.lloie.' J. Marshall; Great - .dritiiiby, Lincolnshire, corbpmerchant, March 24, at Seven, .25, at ten, and April 21, at seven, at .the Granby Inn, Great Grimsby. Attorney, Mr. C.F. gm-- ion, Weldon, Northamptonshire. .1. Wood, Manchester.' R. 11, and'7l,-at three, it the Star Inn, Manchesler. Atrornies, Messrs. Milne anti. Parry, 'Peinples '' • J. Hawkins, Hild,lersfield,.lintelter, April 13,•at five, 14, it nine, and 21; at ten ,'at the Wellingt,in Inn-, Huddersfield. Attorney Mr. IV, Jaconib,•Basingliall.strvet J. Holmes, Birining - ham, dealer in earthen-ware, March 31, . at four; at• the Itiwinick Inn, in Ne3vcastle4inileWLyme, April 1, at the Legs of Man Inn, in Bursism, at twelve, and ' 21, at the Roe-buck at twelve. Attorney, Mr. Ber ridge, Hatton-garden. • - J. Gifford, Froine Selwood, Somersetslkire, cial-nterchant, March 23," 24, and April el, at twelve., at the OziAt le Inn, Bath. Attornics, Mesirs. Blake and . Son, Cook's-court, Carcy-3treet, J. Jenkins, Dudley, WorcesterAbire, mercer, April 2,3, and • 21, at the Packhorse Inn, Worcestershii at eleven. At torney., Mr, G. nonstick!, nonverie-street, ricct-street. J. COnstantine, Crook-mill, Westmorland, M. Robinson, West I-louse, Fewstone, Yorkshire, and A. Tyson, Crook mill, fkix-spinners, April 7, at four, 8 and 21, at eleven, at the :New lied Lion Ink,. in Colne, Lancashire. Attor _ nies, Messrs. Limes and Cowhnrn, Hare-court, Temple. J. Davies, Llairsaiittfraitt, Denbighshire, spirit-dealer, April and C2I, at one, at the George fill], Liverpool_ At tornies, 1E r. C. Bird, Castle Ditch, Liverpool, arid Mr. P. Williams, Elolvtrell, Vlintshire. . . _ J. Mink, Liverpool, won cy-scrivener. March 14, 21, and • Apri! 21, at eleven, atGuildhali. Attorney, Mr. E. Ches ter, Staple Inn. • 0. Proctor and W. Proctor, tirminghant and Sheffield, opti . clans, March 23, 24, and April 21, at, twelve, 111 tine Ifoyal floti.l, in l'eviiple-row, Birmingham: Atioruies, Stevens, Maples, -Pearse, and ti mit , Frederick's , place, Old Jeury. [Dividends, 84c. To-morrow.; PRICE OF STOCKS THIS IiAY At TWI,I,VE• O'CLoCii. - 1 P r. 3 per Cent. Cans. 77 1 78 774 Exch. Bibs, ed. ..11s. I " 5. Fr 5 p•er Cent. N. Ann... 1034-* Ditto, 21d...155. l2s• 14 ! s iii India 13 utid5......9&,. 955. pr. Cons. for Aeconnt...•••' • ' .E. EIION, Stock-Broker, ~r: . 2, Cornhill, and Lombard - O E_, " - . .--.-..........-- Or. HIGH-WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORR—,. 5, # Morning, 19 minutes after 5. 1 Et-ening, 44 m i n utes afE....,1,.,1e" THE S .1\ 80LEit QUIS DICERE FALSUM AUDEAT LONDON, WEDNESDAY,, , MdiIiC4 3t, 1816. At R late hour this-.clay, we received s;r: ( 131 Parisyaperi, to Stmday_last inclusive, The I°l' owing are extracts:— Pants, Maacrt 3.—The Duke of Welling gave a dinner o 4 Sunday - of_4ct_covert. . •"..Ithecu the Light between Sunda,' go Monday, about half an hour after midnights rice Brigadierin service at the hotel of the Duke of '" re lington being at . the moment patroling fr and hearit i r l the discharge of a musket in the rear of the hotel' prOceeded immediately . to the Ceutitiel yvh° ' 3l)- pealed to have fired. The latter stated, that h"` . ing heard several persons coming towards OW' and having called out to them several times Q lll Vice, the persons answered Bourgeois, and. c ont!' need their course; that seeing them approach to° near him, be had presented his musket and fire(' that_ at the same moment he received allow his face with a stick, 'and also a blow 'Ot t ' sword cane, but which only came across the c"l' c of his , c9at, and did not do him any injury. " Several patrblliags inimediately took plac e ' but no person could be .dkcoVered: It apr Brs certain that the sentinel,. Who is. a,young 10 ° .' 'being alarmed without -any cau s e, fitedhiSP os ' .ket, and finding tow - late that he had been de' ceived; he sought to paliate hiS fault by adkitrg false declaration. The contusion which•llealkr e.d he bad received ice t he riht cheek is, accorerog. to all appearance, the cilK!ct of the. recoil h it own musket, and there, ithere. is nothing, to-indicate o ° l the rent in the cape • c?„1 hivkreaveifat las bee ° made by a cane'sword.. • '" The second centiuel a 1 ho was .siationett the Champs-,Elys6es, and who_ was only 12- pReO distant from the one alluded to, heard lice rCr rt of the finisher,' but neither saW ., nor heard. l'"/ person. " The soldier tvb n fired was conveyed bef" re the Staff de la Place, and interrogated. Aft' r his interrogatory, and the depositions had Teen received t ►t other soldiers on the station, he " )9 committed to prison. . MARCH s.—Loid Kinnaird, who came fr p° Brusscls to Paris, to give, it is said, inforuiri. 6ll respecting attack on the Duke of Willing!'o on the 10th February, has set out on his r eturn tt7 Brussels. " There vas a "conference Yesterday at th e hotel of the Duke of Wellingt.>n, at which th e Duke (le Richelieu, 'the Austrian, Prussian, 0 3 Tuscan Ambassadors attended. • It is said t hat the Minister of the interlor made, the clay before yesterday, a commonicatio o to.the Committee on the Concordat, which tend s to accelerate the discusSiOn . of that important subject. According to thisconunonieation, there is to be only one Bishop for each Department: 7,.—'rhe Duke crf-Weilingron conference yesterday with the Prussian ana Sp a. nisis An)ba , sadors. • - - MARCH 8:--The Duke cif Wellingion ( ) HMO yesterday with the Dukes d'Angoulemi . and de Bert y "CHAMBER OF PEERS. " The d . is'elissioi) on die Recruitment Projc l . '..coutinsird every . day from Moiplay.iill Friday. •" MARcn 6.—The Alitiiscer of War was beard in answer to the objections maile again 4 ' the Projet in the course of the discussion. " The first thirteen Articles re provisionallY adopted. " 'Several amendments were proposed, on e tending to.authorize, with some modifications, the Royal ,Guards to recruit from the Corps of th e Line ; another tending to enco►►rage, by a money' bounty, voluntary enlistment ; and a third to sub. stittne for a cuinpulsory enlistment, a number of men to be furnished from time. : to time by the Cantons. " These amendments were got rid of by the previous question. Of) the first arnendMent the previoui question was carried by S 9 to 81. " An amendrnerat was moved to exempt eldest TO CORRES. to leNoTti.s, Ib 7 r.lorrow.—buz other Correpontienti .b 31 1 0- thank the Opposition Orators in Parliament for the?. i)otieineitt of their.respective Favolirs'. 1 TazArrtu - , wEGISTER. Performed La.', Night. MEAY k ROYAL, DHO r- LA NE .-- - Tbe Bride of .-11/ 0 : Jim, Mr. Kean; Zulieka,Alrs. Martlyn. • After which' 'Midnight Hour. ' Dfr; THEATRE ROYAL, COVENT-GA RDSN.—Zu ma : Mirror , Brahani Zinisa,. Miss Stephens. After which, 1 10161° Gulliver. an d Aaalvl;o-3 France Dv c-2 Waterford; Gaernseidos ersev, 2 Hull:mil, 8 Gotteitt dargbi F rauc e, 4 • birrgt;, 1 Flanders. 1 I to SIJj I t t