The Sun. — London, England, 1810-12-21 00:00:00

M F; . . ißltgouldjuiiify them in aderpting liis propotition. le, t - Lal nut aivancr. , <Lone Single new argument in C 4 400;1 of 0) , propriety 'of Stich a p•oceetling - . How • ir the eight Hon. Geall..mar, /night be r ght as to to retri.s :on i neceissry to be iwposerl, was a ques t rrta into which be did in.tt wish to enter, but any r of imposing:my rionst-aerable restrictions, be tl llotubt int The Prince/had now gained C peri-Od more advanced in life than that at which he gterter rrunal-ser ourKiags has reached before ner ascended the • throne,. and, if at 48 years of age, • he Prince was not tit to take up:)o himself the cares • f Government, he never v.rottl•l be fit to be en- trusted w ith then, altd or.ght in that case to . : • excluded trout the n-gat aniboiity for ever. j t he 1.101. t Hon.s Gentleman had spoken much of t . the blessings enjoyed by the people of Englind ma der I.l , ljesty's long extended reign -He 1113 i as sensible as oily man how touch the nation owed.ro the mild s'irtues of the King, but much as he re -1 vered the Kitig's•plivate character, he could not but '24( if his dorninions were in. that prosperous state hi Whiell 1114 y once were ? He could not but a\ik ; if we t , - wre now to (hat si.iteof peace, of security, of tran 'Tiitity„ and of glory, , rith which we were blessed whets he ascended the throne? Are the .Miiiivers of the weskit day .such as then directed the Councils of .the nation, or such as ought cow to be entrust-. ed with - the guidanie of trublie affair. Thy Right ilonciurable Gertileman thought himself per hap4 n,te of the blessings of his Majesty's reign.— The lt:ght Hun. Gentleman then tuota.(l as an amtilido,rit l that all the words of the original roo 7 tion stt:uld to taken away after the . .voird " that," tor the purpose of inserting the following worth:- - " 'Etre an H ambler address he presence:l to his Royal Hightu-ss the Princeof Wale', requesting him to take upon during his Xlaiesty's present iniiisposition. the Go ter/anent of -hese RediillS, to administer the smite under the title or Sckle, Regent of the fillited liingticnns of Great Sri- Laid-1-41 - 4 I tei4nd." Mr. CANNOT s G sail, that the s Committee bad now soh:pitted to their consideration. the [moire of the •proceediegs recommended in the present untortu mite St u men of the country. LI on one side the gersoion was laid before thetas, upon tee other a part of the vestion ; and thry were now io determioe V , hat course it wotod be right to fallow nu tier all he cirumstai.ces The duly Wil , Ciftlesoleed tar'aso tMeru was to pi oeide frrr s great emergency, by • sept3lying the, rk-teet, which Led taken place in the poster; for this purpose two methods had been prop se i, altd their 3u ignuent *it TO be tX.el"- 6,,cd in dtei the prefereuee. Upon one hand it was strrgssste , i that the delicielicy should be remedied, by au act, which, t 1 it was net ae act et the Issgis lature,sdiffesed trout is, not ice being something tress, but itt king 'something more. Upon the other, 'tisy were referred so precedents of an ancient date, and called upon to form their decision opon grounds which did riot appear to justify the proceeding re commend, d. Toe precedents which they had to 'giiide them were twteof them analagotes, and one drr.ct aird here he thought it necessary to observe, (141 he did nut feel booed to look to those etinpl-s which were draWn tram an earlier and . snore irtr,erlea state, of the Constitution, when he it in his power to appeal to a period more recent and perfe4A.. As to the former precedents, they might in the a . therice of better, be resorted tteatialogy might be adopted where immediate_applicatiOn was sots ;tit for in vain ; but such not being the case at. present, he should look to that_ instance which bore in its eireerostauces the stroogest resernVance, and approached in its period the nearest to that in which t .ey now stood. The first precedent addaced was, thrt - of the ' Act of lie,toration, in the circuni- . sees' es of which he Could find no similitude to'the present case ; by that an exiled Monarch was to restored - to a situa;ion of which he bad been unjeoly ekprived ; ls,t how could it be said that any ri;ht had been withhal which they were tilled non 10 'adjudicate ; that any siiidaeon had . kserit oticred which they were called open to . r4' ir ; was there now a Monarch to be restored. If such was 11. e prClikailletli its ,which they were placed, 11,, would allow that the Act of Restoration was an - authority to which they could properly be relerrrd'e but it it was clear that they had now no . rigle to adjudicate, no t iolation to repair—if they were not about to create a power, but to supply a temporary defect in the exercise of it, surely that au thorny could not he considered as binding, whose citcurnsfarces - could nor be proved to be similar. When, therefere; the Right Hors, Gentleman said that both Houses of Parliament acted in that in stance as he described, he in reality said nothing =re than that they had done what- was necessary and no thing beyond it. With regard to the Revoluton, it would be Well before they permitted their feel itigs to hurrytheut away; to consider what the ob- Jett Was. Was it, he would ask, to take care of , Monarch ? Was it to insure his return to the Government of the Country Or, was it not to provide against that return, and set up safe-guards and barriers as agiinst a hostile approach ? He did sot wean to - deny that there might be some as sistance derived froth such cases, but then all the 'assistance that could be pretended 'to, was that *.of analogy, and analogy derived under sercomsiances direetly the reverse. •ir had been urged by the Right 'pion. Gent.' (\lr. Potlonlay), that nu a. tempt was made to . procure the King's name to the Act.. Cer-' ta . inly there was net ; for how could such an attempt . - sucCeee a hen there was no Kree ? How could it suc ceed when the Executive was nor Merely suspended in its forietions by temporal : ) , and accidental-emir rences; but by fhe- absolete exclusion of the King,. lino the total want of the royal authority ? Besides,. there was the farther diaierilly "trt affixing the Great . Si-3i, as at that very motile:it the Great Seal, from' ,accidental circurnstanc-s, was at the bottom of the Thaaies. There was, no reason, however, for : conclu ling, that if it 1,.V3S possible to procure such ..ignatures, and the Great Seal was. in existenee,. Parliament w gold not hate availed itself of the sanc the It thcire %vete a precedent directly applkable, tord•iebtedly there were princerl'as to be considered lat,to'ne" it should be acyite,ced tn. The Hob; Baione't (SM I.3,rdett) acting,, tsp,es this conviction bad node some obsert"aeoes upon thit of t7BB, but:thy e k.s err sich as in his , (Mr. Canoine's) opinion were tar front coin. lusiere The Hon: Bart. had said, ,that one authorhy tt its M4:five, - and proposed, as his re tueeyethat tie first sleedd inactive also. He wish to try the exPeriment of inyigorating • the whole by toe strange process of sincapacitating every branch. He even proposed that the. Parliament cou tit en an cea , the question? solution" was -such a BLit rrcorn . • +sure, td put rir3ctice Cut IA" the pu'ipose Whia! 11 di i mended, W 214 also nut a liitle. remarkable. The the - mutable Baronet had said; that Parliament alone did not address Charles the Second: but had diacreetly called to its assistance the Lord. Mayor and Corporation of Loudon ; so that he ascribed to them not only their own but a vir tual authority, and would have them dissolve at once for the benefiferf advice and - assistance from the Lord Mayor, t he Aldermee, aitd Common Colin hl. For his part, he did not see by what right they. t he Iteptesentet hies' of the People, could se parate themselves from their Constituents, even fitr an object so desirable as that of civic assistance: The authority upon which, they should stow pro ceed was that which arose out of the necessity of the .case, nor would he admit that a Parliament so bete rogeneoualy called together as that which invited the Prince of Orange, ahotaid be (let rued more bind ing than the more regular and recent instance upon. which .Minis'ets had founded their proposition.— Co* a precedent drawn front revoltniotiaty times be applicable to quiet times ? And would they, to use the laNuage of Mr.. Burke, " Make the extreme medicine of the Constitution its daily bread," adopt- . iag that as a common cause, winch from its nature wa s only particular and extreme ) The Prince of Orange had issued writs to call the Parliament ;' this was a Just proceeding, it was just and wise, and necessary, bat. Just and wise only because it was eecessa4.— They had now a Pediament lull, tree, andunletter t;d, and that Parliament ee constituted was to provide for the exigency that existed. Would the Ho t4ltahle Baronet to adopt his . precedents in titeir fulleetetit, contend, that if the Prince of Wales was to call a Parliament by writs, such an ad would be just and. wise; no, for it would want the great essential to its justification, necessity. "I'l c Parhatheut heittg now called together, the. quee ee Was, how they could best prov;de for the -me t - a -ere: a that had unfortunately t , tred, and remedy the mutilated state in wiech the Government was placed ny the sacotnpetency of the King to exercise his Royal funtlions i Theßight Hon. Gentleman, (Nla. Ponsonoy) whose eloquence had.been displayed sit such an able speece, in no part of which e as he nitre able than that which relattal to thi - ince:nape- ~ teocy, I insisted upon it strongly ; but whit did 1.3 c say mote than that the situation was oue of &eat difficulty ; and what . was now to be done but to consider ho ,v they might best be extricated. It • ryas, k thought, for those who objeded to the hue • proposed to state one which eoule be nt•i - rt just-and eligible. The Revolution was certainly a period *to which they all looked back with veneratam ; but that they might not be driven by their veneration to hasty and rash conclusions, it %I/6111d he well for ' _them to consider the ditficuities of that time, to link to_ the debates, and recoiled that they-oited to a' majority of only two all the blesssitagg will: h they enjoyed as a nation. The Right Hon. Gentleman would find in Burnett's account, that the . Tories . contended the King had ri , it abdicated the Throne, but should be considered in a state of derangement, and supplied byer Regency, so that'the :in'ilogy was '-praisers negatives! by the argument. But the Right Hon. Gentleman wished for an Address : he (Mr. ,' Canni , g) lutist say, that no argument had hen ,orfercd to prove that they would exercise less power by that mo e than by the one now proposedeo the, House, or be likelyito entail less difficulties upon the cou n try. Thete.certaitily was one ground upon which it Miglit be considered. better, and that was supposing the right' in the Prince of Wales to the Regency, a right which he did tee hear any otie con tend .thr, and which as it couldsnothe maintained, could not justify them in resonitigad a pioceedingso crowded-with embarrassments. He knew not even in a balance of ditliculties how•they could better de cide, than by reverting to the, more recent and appli cable ease, by looking to the aelhority•ot the prece dent in Mr. Pitt's time, and the degree to which, at that time, Parliament thought fit tohianctioe the proceeding. Surely it would:be owned, that it no great benefit resulted, a great evil must arise, front a departure front recent precedent-; - it must-be ma nifest that it would twee tendency to conbaund all order, and, abaudoning. succeeding . Parliatnents to the conflicting authorities of their predecessors, make their decisions 'little more than so many im pulses of passion and inclination, sanctioned by the inconsistency and contrariety of fornier cases. Upon the subject of limitations, the only one that lie thought could with propriety be made to accom pany the grant of those powers with which Parlia ment might invest the Prince of Wales, was that. which related to the case of the perion of the King; whatever 'caber. provisions might be thought ne- , .cessary, and whatever difference there might be with respect to their nature or extent, they could:all have but one feeling upon this point. As to the o!her limitation with which his Right Hon. Friend (Mr. Perceval) had signified his intenthm of accompany ing tt, he could. not but think that if the Su 7 veteign Power was conferred at all; these were not nines in which • tt would-be right to adopt any limitation. He did net think that they were beand to follow any Act . .as a precedent through all the circumstances . which . n itre and chance might , alter ; and if lie. wee not convinced in this -opinion before, the arguments of the Hue. Berhnet would have 'been sufficient to decide him. It had been asked, why ; if such a power .was ever unneces sary, it should be i thought expedienhto continue it I He-was not °tie of those who disapproved of the de lay-of Ministers in bringing forward the question,_ on the contrary, they inid his entire ap; rob itiiin , for the delicacy they manifested; and if his Right Hon. Friend had said that procrastination would that be at tended with injurious consequences, to the country, he would willingly agree to defer to a 'still more distant peiicel the performance of- tbat painful duty which they were now to. exercise; taat not being ' the case, and they bait); engaged.in thedelic:ne and melencholy task, he would not givehis vote over for an experimental retrenchment. Such was his honesi convichoa; he had uttered those sentiments without any uoderstandieg .e ith any man, or set of men, arid uttered them .to.the judgment of the Home as the dictates of sincerity e in his vote ,this night be should agree to proceed in that path which the pre-' recent immediately .applicable pointed - out-7-not that he thought it faultless e but that where there Were evils to be ericodutered, he would rather pro 7 seed upon authority than run the 'hazard of origi went., especially as the eitamples stated by the ahete-eeetrt . ced, and such as • ought fatter 10 be 3V 014 ed Wit iet,itstcs~l. 'e agreed that thew had to at in a double sense " ez tremo ptiatatittr," for their King and for their Country. They were aging in an important crisis, and un an impartial subject, and as.they were pos se,Sed of powers, they should tt ,, e them for the good of all, cottscious, that while they exercised them generously tky would exercise them rtghtly. (Hear, kear.) Lord TEMULE, in a speech of very great ability, defended the precedent of 1.788, and therefore con curred in the proposition for., proceeding by way of Bilk instead of by Address, Lord JocaLrbz Supported the resolution. • Mr. ADAM opposed it in' a speech of considerable length. The ATTORI4Ev-GENERAL contended that the great distinttion between the present case and those which had been quoted' by the Gentlemen (!ti the other side of the House was, that Parliament was pow sitting, and that in the othe'r cases it was not. The precedent of 1788 appeared, to hint to be de cisive upon the subjet:r. Sir S. ROMiLLY said, that the mode-of prOceed ing-bv gill appeared to him to' he inconsistent, and calculated to produce delay, and at the same time to establish a dangerous and •unconStitinional pre- "ceflent. The SOLICITOR-GENERAC denied that there was apparent inconsistency in the proposition. 'tiSrlie tiler the two Houses directed the Chancellor, ,or the• Regerr, to exercise a virtual authority, was one and the same it hinz, hecan.e the power was substantially derived from the Paeliameet ; the address was open to.the same ohjeCtion. Mr. HORN ER, opposed the resolution, 4pa :urged strongly the precedents in the reign of Henry VI.. Mr. CHOKER complimented the latter Gentleman. more on the ingenuity he had displived . on the top:es 'lie had chosen, than his prudence in wholly avoiding those teat constituted the chief difficulty of the case—He has endeavoured to shew by much learned irguinerit, that it W3S . not regu lar fore the Hous , ot Parliament to direct the Chancellor to affix the Great Seal• to piteots, but this %as not what it was to le - tva pio%ed. He 'should have proved that the course lie proposed, of directing an ai-rent to direct the C! , ancellor would get rid of the ditfictalry. - It even the Regent were ap pointed-by the address, the appointment would be recomplete. The Courts of law would not re cognise his authority till it had received the sanc tion of that . Great Seal under which they, themselves were acting, and the Regent's tirstact Must be that - which"the Right Honourable Gentleman opposite (Mr., Ponsonhy) ridiculed . as an absurdity- in the • Chancellor of the Exchequer's proceedings, name ly, the signing the King's consent to his own appointment, by. affixing the Great Seal to a com mission. So that in fact the'mude of proceeding by Address only staved off the. difficulty—it removed what was called the fiction one step farther ; bUt that fiction sooner or later the Hon. Gentleinarehad riot slieWn how it was possible to avoid. The Wm; Gen-. tleman dwelt much on the precedents in the early and in the latter parts of Henry the Sixtlf.s reign. He admitted them to be good ; but these very prece dents which thd Honourable Gentle Man referred to' as constitutional, contained in terms that very fiction which the Right _Honourable Gentleman, Mr. Prin •Sonby, had characterised by the names of ebitirdity, imposture, . and frond. The Right Honourable Gentleman had said, what shalt We, 'by affit.:h , g the Great Seal, make the King say, as it were, I am sane so far as to 'admit my insanity. I am coinpetent to admit my incompetency, what a gross and monstrous fiction it is to endeavour to supply a defect in the royal authority by that very au hority which you presume to be defi cient: Undoubtedly 'the Right Honourable Gen tleman had argued these points with great elo quence e but -he had not been able 10 shew that - all his ridicule did not equally apply to his own case, when, after the dddress, the Regent '.would have to make use of the Great Seal. But the precedents granted and relied upon by,"the Honourable Gen- Ileman were direelly in contradiCtion to his Right Honour:11)1e Friend, and involvedpreoisely the saree fietion. In the early, parts of the King'sfreign the. Chancellor affixes the Great Seal to Commissions for clang- Parliaments and appointing Regents, which set forth, in the King's own name, his in competency on the score of infancy. The deficiency of power in the : king to do any at is admitted in the very instrument in' which, nominally, he perform's tnost important duty. This precedent, then, would fall under the ;ridicule of the Right' Hbnourable. Gentleman. What, are the precedents of the latter end of that reign, referred to by the Honourable Gentleman, still stronger, still more in point ? The King being deranged in his intellect, the Houses of Parliament think fit to appoint his son to, be Re gent (when he shall become of age), they do it by Act of Parliament assented to by the King's Com mission, and 'the same day the Great Seal - is put to letters patent, running in' . these words : " We Henry, by the Grace of God, Bcc. &c. taking into consideration the infirmity with which it has pleased God to of lta us, , and that it would be injurious to our person, and Would-delay the speedy - recovery of our health, if we weie personally to attend,lo the affdirs tN the realm, and .reposing confidence, &c. in our eldest son Ed ward, do, by and :with the advice and consent of ,Parliament, appoint him Protector of my kingdom, Jo exercise his power according td the tenor and provisions of an 'Act of the said Parliament made this day." _ _ _ Can any precedent be mare stronOty in point than hi 3, and can any precedent involve a greater fiction ? Will the Right HonourableGentleman deny that this is making insanity sane, and incompetency compe tent`? Yet iris the precedent which ►►ts Honourable •Friend admits to be sound and constitutional. How alter that . adtnission the Hon. Gentleman could per. sist Um 'his opinion that the proceeuing by Bill was unconstitutional, he could not guess. The distinc tions the Hon. Gentleman matte between the cases -was to be sure somewhat extraordinary. WV (be says) •woutd direct the Chancellor to affix the Great Seal, and in the case of Henry VI. he did it on his own respousibiiiiy. The Hon. Gentleman thinks it would be betier that , the Chancellor should do this important duty of his own mere motion, than with the advice of both Houses of Parliament.— he migh t• come down, says the Hon. Gentleman; af terwards, to the Parliament to indmnify him ; this &flies , tip 111 C whole ' argument, for the Chancellor may -- as well have flui sanction of - Parliament befor as its indemnity alter. The course we would proceed in does not chfter from the lion.Gent.'s in principle, he would allow the Chancellor to act and come af terwards for indemnity, we direct the Chancellor to. act, and thus as it Were anticipate the indemnity,—l - Hon. Member then adverted to the Revolot ion; a case by no means pirat y , but one the analogies . of which were consistent with the course now re' commended. He observed, that in replying to one point of this precedent,_which bad been ably put by his Right Hon. Friend below him (Mr. Canning) ; and by tie _Noble Lord opposite - -(Temple), the. Honourable - Gentleman had hardly de/It fairly; as he had not quoted the whale Statement of the precedent, which was ditectly what - bad beet originally represented and diametrically opposite tTi. what the Hon. Getitlinan represented it to be. concluded by saying, that . 1-1)n, Gentlemen opposite had shevya that the proceeding Bill, was in some .degree, irregular ; but they had shrunk- from thts challenge which they bad received, to chew how they could remove the irre;_,Tutarity—the difficulty Mr.Croler thought it was notin this form nor io that, but in the nature of the c-se; in the proceeding which be suppurted, the difficulty was maje as lit as possible in that recommended tr.(4: the Gala ,side, tt seemed to him to be rendered more COMpli - cated. by the addition of another sisp to the process. He must therefore adhere to the precedent of 1788, not withstanding the d;fficuity . that tl invole2.l, until the Hon. Gentlemen opposite should be plessed to explaui by what inechaniim, he had almost said by what rnagic,;they intended to remove the still grater chtlicult,es that their proceedings incurred. Mr. WHLTBREAD left :that the present was a mo mentous- ctisis.- The: House dicil not, in his opi nion, sufficiemly coniemplate it. With lesi;ect to the prtcetient of pas s on which the Right Hon,: Gelittenian so much t3lied, it night be Tecoliect cd that' the Bill wp.s stopped in its progress thwugh the House of Lord, , , for his Majesty got betitr is the interval, and happily for the country, was le stowd to the exercise of his lat6lties. The Hon. Gentleman col4etided that in the Bill was to be foand nothing but _complexity and absurdity, not so w the Address. The object was to restrain 'the Pierogatives of the Crown, arid con.equeotly tt'.) prevent the prufiet exercise of the functions of the. Government. He did not think that it was-a proper return tor the dignified conduct of the Royai Per- 1 son, who had kept himself on all occasions NVittt a becoming reserve. Was it a proper mode of providing for the establiShment of the Sovereign Power and State, by commencing with unusual re strictions ? What was the office of Regent ? He held U. as the trustee of. an estate, and was bound to lake care that. he did not impair the ROyal ,Authority.: 'The RtZlit Honourable .Gentlentan Mr.Cannin) hadttalked about the Great 'Stial .being". lost at the Revolution ; he seemed to tar get that that was not the only time it was missing. In. 1,784 some person ran away with it, but au artificer was found who ri•.'e one in it few hottrs. With respect to the care of his Majesty, aid tiny one suspect that a more affee - tion'ate or tender b , :ait existed (save one) ex-:;pt the Princeot Wales"? His delicate and nie-> sense of propriety induced hint rather 'so that the guardiabship of his Majesty be confided to the Queen. He was stopi e.I . the Cammittee from asking a question which he would now repeat. He would ask who sent for "a certain Physician to attend his Majesty ? I-lad any particutar person that guardianship which to -Ibv Prince of Wales they so pertinaciously deity ? These were, questions which demanded answers, l'he HOD. Gentleman coaciuded with expressing himself most strongly in favour of the Address. Lord CASTLERE4GA would not - trespass on the patience of the House at so late an' hour. wished:only briefly to 'state the grounds of the of nion ( which he . felt called upon to delivel=;. on :question the most delicate, and underrcircumstatices the Most arduous. Under such circumstances he was decidedly of opinion, th3t the House sinin4 prpceed by a Bill, with a view constitutionally to meet the exigencies.ot the moment. In the two Houses of Parliament alone, resided the power of providing for such an emergency ; and that power could only grow out of, !and be justified by the ne 'cessity of the case. Od the Estates of the Itealto not only.devolves the duty, but the responsibility of supplying the present melancholy defect in the functions of the executive authority. [We regreiextremely . that we have not room to insert the renuinder of the Noble Lord's very able Speech.] Several Nlembeo then rose to speak, but the cry . of Ques tion was so general and reiterated, that the Gallery was or dered to be cleared, and the House. divided on the motion of the Chancellor of the Llxchequer, Ayes, 269.--Noes, isj. —Majority, tie:. A fter.the division the House \vas resumed ; the Report was ordered to be received this day, when it would be mov ed that the Committee have leave to sit again on MondaY se'nnight.—Adjourned at Four this morning. L 0 N D 0 i'V , FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21, 1810. Windsor Castle, Dec. 21, iB to. " The KING has had • a very good nigh!, and better to-clay, It' is incorrectly stated in a Morning Paper do t , orders had been given for seizing and detair.ift Swedish vessels. No such order Ims been issued. The CHANCELLOR of the E%CrIEQUER sent, .0 1 Tuesday, we believe, a respectful Letter to ,PHINCE Of WALES, containing the proposed plat} the Regency. as Royal Hinghness deolitv!d giving any opitl . l oll upon the subjeCt, before- it was discussed to ROW meat, but adverted to the answer *given by hit" .178 S. All Ills Royal Highness's brothers, and Duke , Of GLOUCESTER, hAve signed A protest agaic ° the proposed restrictions. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHFQUER, in rep to his Royal Highness, ue -. understand, expres sl ',l his regret that the 0.41 was disarrt:ved of by 11 ;;S:. male branches of the Royal Famliy, 'ulat added 11 "7", Ministers leh it their dniy to perse+ ere in it, tv' j ti f especially as it had with tt:c app ro b a tion Pdrliatnunt and of the Country in 178 s, mid t h ', hts MAnSTY, aver hi. rc , covs:ry, lied strongly '> pressed h!ssatisittlion upiin the subject. , Loudon : Printed by 11. 1 I Aft RIS, of 4, Niartle7t-c 011 -i and publltlhoi by W, .utti Moitcm-“ 1 " ,- , iz, StrAlct. NUJ 4 I 8 - 22 . 7.0 . 2 4 - 1 44 • 3,E00 4,012 N P VC: Li lite Unit Two Po tie Scltt An eal teady ex the Drai will cor II A: SiiAß'l Sate at 1 The to zo.oc Four P lower .t• In ti and 2,3 above Let T' the ift New F be red I which tery ur 'l'lC than 4 where, And 5 T‘irelv EY THE AL A' with to th the Blitz from prisi also joini Lan , as a inlay Mes and squ;