The Sun. — London, England, 1818-03-18 00:00:00

nifi,edlris as• . en . t.) , e—Tlren the Noble Lord's Object was .plainly to destroy. the prerogative of the 'Crow!) the custody of the. prisoners, and to 'establish tire stew right of Magistrates to visit riot the prisons but prisoners. He, therefore, upon tire grerondis that the Bill was unnecessaty in - one view, and detrimental in the other, found it his duty to oppose this motion. Mt. S. BOURNE said, the Noble Lord had stet ekthe'case, but not the whole case, for he did not state that be had persuaded-the Magistrates of Werks to inflict - punishment upon the defendant before - he was tried.—(hear,, hear, hear !)—Nor had the Noble Lord .seated what had been done by him and thleother . Magisirates to•prejudice the public mind against the defenaant.during the trial. —lt Was usual'atit the rysoltut ions : of the Quarter Sessions should be publislred in the newspapers. In the present case, whae.the.trial.was pending, Ike resolutimis. against _the defendant wet e pub lished and although in passing those resoletions there was .. a diV . i . sion among the Alagistrates, 13 having voted one way, and 16 the other, these • r,s . ohttions carte published with tile names of the 13 Magistrates to then, who bad voted against them.—(Loud cries of hear, hear, heat !)—lf the Noble Lord made himself a party to such pro ceedings, might make what speeches he chose about Liberty and the Constitution, but these facts would be answer enough to them all.— (Lout! chest ins; ) Sir F. BURDETT had no doubt that whets the Noble Lord' (Folkestone) replied, lie would be able to explain the facts which had been stated. If he onderstodul what mis done to the gaoler, the whole punishmetre was suspending him from his.office, anti t;.is lumislinteut was inflicted merely for the purpose of irying the question as to. the legelity of his refos.al to allow the Noble Lord to have access to toe prisoners. As persons as learn ed in the law as the Hon. and Learned Gontleman entertained different opinions on the subject, he sew that there were grounds for doubts, and should therefore give his vote in favour of the Inot ... 'I he SOLICITOR-GENERAL contended that the trial had determined that Magistrates had not the right of holding communication with persons committed on the charge of High Treason. Had it not been for the statute of KiNg William, even Counsel could not have been admitted to such pri soners without the leave of the Crown. It it haul been the intent iou of the Legislature to allow such power to Magistrates, that intention would have been clearly expressed. But as the law stood, no suclepower was given. Lord FOLKESTONE had only wished to remove the doubts which he conceives) to exist on the sub ject.. If the Hon. and Learned Gentleman (the Attorney-General),_ with the weight of his high authority, told hint there was nu such doubts, he would certainly not be foolish enough to bring iu a Bill to remove what had no existence. As to the charges made against hint resFecting the sus pension of the gaOler, and the publication of . the Resolution of the Court of Sessions, much misre presentation had taken place. Oct the 10th June hue had been to visit the gaol with other Magis trates, and had bean refused admittance to the prisoners committed for, high treason. lie h a d endeavoured to persuade the mast that he was acting wrong in refusing . , and haul received this answer from hint :—" I tolite agree with you, my Lord, I believe .1 have no right to keep you out, but 1 ton ordered by supe rior powers, and must do it." On the I-Ith .June, he (Lord F.) called again, and asked the man whether, atter consideration, he was disposed to.give admittance, which was again refused. He had then preferred a complaint at the Quarter Sessions, and moved a Resolution, in which tile Count agreed unanimously, that Magistrates had a tight to visit all prisoners. 'the gaoler was called In, admonished, and told, that tie Magistrates expected to be admitted. He begged leave to write to the Secretary of State out the subject, but thee Court said the Secretary of State had nothing to do with it, and gave the man an hour to come to.a resolution. At the expiration of that time, he said that he would admit the Magistrates. But on a fresh applicatiou being made, the former de nial was renewed. A fresh complaint was made to the Court of Sessions, which he (Lord F.) found. filled by unprecedented unmbers ut Maeis tiates, two of whom had but lately taken their seats. 'fhe case was then proposed to the Gram! Jury, who found a true Bill, and the gaoler hue nig reused to obey the order of the Court of Ses sions, it was the duty of that Court, in support of its own authority and dignity, to ieflict some pu nishment upon him, if a temporary suspension, till • the issue of the trial teas kili)Wll, could be called punishment. As to the publication oldie Resolu tipos, it had beets carried by a majority that they. •alsonla be printed. 1-1 e hid not voted for it : lie 'had rather opposed it, as he did not conceive the matter of sufficient importance. With respect to the insertion of all the names of the 'Magistrates, that was always done at the head of the Iteso lions passed by Courts of 'Sessions, arid was therefore no innovation. In fact, there was no part of those proceedings of which he was asham ed, or which he would not go over again. Mr. S. Boy ENE explained. Lott!Lts.us - rost , ., with the consent of the douse, then withdrew his Bill. aIDiontNNIENT. Lord CASTLE nu y ‘cti:v,,itve notice, that in conse (pence of the Quarter Sessions which world inter vene during the, holidays, it was his intention to propose that the ilonet i a - ajoitrn to the 2d of April. 'There was only one tnotiOn, by a Noble Lord whorl he did not now see in his place, whirl) would have come ou within that.time. If he could have some communication with that Noble Lord, and understood he would not oppose it, he should propose the adjournment to-morrow, if not, the day after. Sir R. HERON presented petitions from the cur• tiers and tanners of Lowth. and Gainsborough against the Leather Tax.—Laid on the table. EDUCATION. Mr. BRoUGLIAM obtained leave to:brin it] ft Bill t►► appoint a CommisSinn to inquire - into the 'alines itt Chanties connected wi:h the, Education of the Poor in different parts-of England. TAXES DEFAULTERS, Mr, BROUGNAM put (.)U his .motion res-pccting Collection of the Assessed Times, the abuses that to.trit place-in that branch, and the defaulters, till after the Holidays. lie gave notice at . the same time that- lie should move to-morrow foe an account of the ,particular districts, and the de faulters mentioned in a circular issued by the Tax Office, and dated the Ist of December last, and concluded by moving for a copy of :that circular itself.—Agreed to. littouonAse then called the compassionate attention of the Right H''n. Gentleman oppo site (the Chancellor of the Exclave') to the hardships slitiered by those who, on account of defaulters, were obliged to pay their Taxes twice over after the money had been invested. In the case of a late de.aulter in the Ordnance Depart ment, who had ah=conded with 20.0001. the dif ference was to be made rip chiefly by half-pay Officers, that class to whom every possible mercy should be shown. He only mentioned this in the hope that the Right lion. Gentleman might apply I imself to find some remedy to soften those hardships. Sir J. NEWFORT moved for an Accratat of . the several Unions of Parishes in Irelaint, in conse quence of Orders in Coo cil. signed by the Lord Lieutenant, under the 2,1 o George 1. and subse quent Irish statutes, specifying the dates of such Ordei s in Council, awl the Dioceses in which the unions had taken place.; and also for an Account of the several Distotious of Parishes under the same Acts.—Agreed to. Mr. BRouGnAat inquired what progressahe Tax Office had made in destroying the Returns for the Property Tax, pursuant to the Orders of the House ? The CHANCELLOR Of the EXCHEQUER was un derstood to defer giving an answer till to-morrow, that he might make inquiry. Mr. BROUGHAM was the more eager to have those returns destroyed, as he had seen many proofs of their existence since his last motion. — He had at this. moment in his pocket the return of the property of a respectable Clergyman,Which he was grieved to see was under 1001. a year. SAVING BANKS.- The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER' asked leave to bling in a Bill to amend the Saving Banks Act, and, as it was understood, to enable Subscribers to receive their interest without taking their. principal out. He congratulated the coun try. on the establishment of those Banks, and their progreaa, and stated, from a paper which he in tended to move should be laid before the House, that the.amountof money paid in.by Saving Batiks, front the fish of August to the 1 1 th of Match last, was 657,0001. General. THORNTON objected to the rate of in terest given to the Subscribers to these Banks. Four and an half per cent. was more than could he got any where else, and would induce persons for whom this benevolent establishment had not been formitd to endeavour to abuse its advan tages: It the interest were reduced.to one and an half, it would satisfy the lower classes, who only cared for security not interest. Sir J. NE,% PORT thought Unit to reduce the in terest would be to give a death blow to these es tablishments. Any expense to which the coun try might he put would he amply repaid by the habits of morality, prudence, frugality, and good order, which they introduced among the people. Alger a few words from Mr. Babington and Mr. Thompson, leave was given. e CHANCELLOR of the ExciIEQUER then moved for an Account of the Sums vested by se veral Saving Banks in England, to the 11th of March, 1818.—Agreed to. NAVY ESTIMATES. Mr. BROGDEN having brought up the Report of the Committee of Supply, Mr. Foa Bea called the attention of the Hotiae to the situation of the wounded Officers of the Navy, who ou' l tt to receive for loss of limbs the same pensions as the Officers of the Army. By the Navy Estimr:tes, however, it appeared that they received 501. less for the same kind of wounds than Army Officers. A Post Captain held the same rank as a Colonel in the Army ; yet the half-pay of the former was only 280/. a year, and that of the latter 3001. He then alluded to the situa tion of Pursers, and partienlady to that of Pursers' Clerks, who consisted chiefly of Midshipmen who had passed, and, alter serving eleven years as Pursers' Clerks, were now thrown entirely upon the world The first 200 Pursers had Zs. a day ; the next 300, 45.; and the last 400 only 3s. Ile hoped the subject would attract the attention of those whose duty it was to remedy such hardships. Mr. CRoK au conten;hed that nothing could he more ignorant and mischievous than the statement of the lion. Gentleman. The imputation which it conveyed was totally unjustifiable. He ought to have learned the state of the two services before he asserted that their half-pay %vas not equal. It was true that a Lie - wen:int.:Colonel in the Army received sixpence a l day more than the younger class of Post-Captains, but then those Post• Captains went on without promotion till they were full Post-Captains, when their pay was hlgher than that of Lieutenant-Colonels. He would state as a proof, that in 1814 there were 200 .of the younger class of Post-Captains who received ed. a-day less than 1,100 Lient.•.Colonels at that time in the Army. Now, the .former re ceived the full pay of Post-Captains, equal to that of Colonels, whilst the latter did not get one farthing morte than in 1814. As to the Pursers, they were in a better state titan they could have been before, for even the Royal. Yacht was not worth more than 701. a year to its Purser. !k at, they felt the improvement in theirsituations so well, that he had received no complaint whatertr , from the in. With respect to Pursers' Clerks, there were no such persons. There was the Purser's Ser• vast, who carved ,the cheese and provisions,' bitt that,Was a common man. The Hon.Geptlernau perhaps meant the Captain's Clerk, but lie was the Captain's own servant, engaged solely by him, and discharged at will, entirely unconnected with the public service, and therefore not. susceptible of half-pay. He (Mr. C.) thought he had some rea son to complain that the Hon. Gentleman shoold come down to read him a lesson which be had not learnt himself. The flon;flir . ablq Gentle man • ought to have made himself, acquainted With what the Board of Admiralty had done for the advantage of all classes of the ser vice, %% lien he would have found more rational ini;. proVefferit crriivaca into a ti . rde of 5 or 6 years than haft been effecter) by former Administrationq in 13, 16, or even 23 'years preceding. Btit he by no means Meant to say that any blame what ever attached to those diVrent Administrations. They had been thiefly'engaged in wars, but it appeared that they had been equally zealous for the uacal service, tliotiO their efforts had not been so Comprehensive or effectual. The present °dicers of the Admiralty had for several years devoted ten hours . a day to their arduous ditties, and it was theu'efore hard' to hear Gentlemen come down and accuse them of injustice and partiality. Mr. Mot+7l.ol thought the Hon. Gentlema❑ had misapprehended his tlon. Friend. Withont wish ing to disparage the Army, whose great achieve ments were so justly the theme of our exaltations, it must be well known, that unless the Navy had performed those essential pans of the service which had made way for the Army, the latter could never leave achieved those triumphs. The Ilan. Gentleman concluded with passing a high eulogiuM on the conduct of the Navy before Algiers. Mr.llusKtssozst thought the lion. Gentleman who sp,ke la , t most' have persimded himself that the flouie had never before heard of the achieve ments of the British - Navy, or that they bad been forgotten. Bit the naval men kneW, thotiOt - they were not in England,'ehat the Houses of Parlia ment anti . the country 'recognised their serVicet with feelings of pride, trintnph, and gratitude, anti had, given them marks of their munificence and generosity, as bi the grant of 100,0001.10 v the victory of Algiers. But they had never looked to any other reward than prize-mony, and he was surprised at the Ilonottrabl Gentlemall's state , meat on this point ; for if the accounts could be procured, it would be seen that there was'no war, nor any three wars together, in the annals of the country, that had been so productive in prize-money as the last. Ile would maintain that nothing wa§ more false, unfontided, and mis chievous, than exciting a jealousy between the two branches of service, by comparisons between the half-pay, and assertions that the one was greater than the . other. It was the Naval prize money that afforded in time of war the prospect of independence and wealth,while in the Anil' the prize:mbney was next to nothing. Could the 1-lon. Gentleman resist an appeal for the increase of half-pay to the Army. if he were now to , catry his point in behalf of theNaVy ?The lion. Gentleman (Mr. 11.) tlien went into a comparative statement of theitalf-pay, and showed hoW . the deei4ons . of the Medical Boards regulated the' ammint of the pensions for the loss of a limb or w her serious wounds. He concluded with OhserVing, that it must be seen what little 'ground there was for the assumed grievances, and that it. was -in vain for Gentlemen who made these Charges to diSclaim partiality, when they were brOught forward, Ses sion after Session,.Withiitit any just foundatioth; Arr. FORERS, in reply to' the Hon. Secretary, observed, that he might have saved himself the trouble' of the statements he 'had male, as they were all to be found in a pamphlet which watt ge nerally known, entitled, " Ob s ervations on the Claims of the' N•41;y ; '" hitt only 2000/."or 3000/. would make up all the diffet ethic that was asked , in equalizing the pensions 'for the wocnded; and this was refused. lie denied haviiig made any invidi ous comparison between the two services ; and in sisted that 'nothing wan 'more coin Mon .than for a Midshipman to become a Captain's Clerk, and af terwards a Purser, though lie 'nti.;ht not have ex pressed himself correctly in 'calling it 'promotion. He had no objection to a'dniii that the Admiralty had done a great deal for the'Navy; . but it should be recollected that it was only since he (Mr. F.) and other - Gentlemen had begun 'to talk about the hard case of the Midshipmen, that upwards of 1000 of them had been - rai3ed•to the rank of Lien- tenants, and they were satisfied. But the 'gene ral complaint of•the'\avy was, that they were'not on the footing they'Onelit !to be,' in . comparison with Officers'of 'the Army. All, therefore, he wished was, that the' Navy should be equally well taken care of. After a few words from Mr. CROKETI, expres sive of his readiness to explain every item in the Committee to the satisfaction of the House, the Resolutions were agreed to. • On the motion of the CHANCELLOR of the Ex CHEQUER, the Report on the - High lie mmirration Bill was - ordered to be fofther consi dered on Monday the 6tb of April. CIiURCHES AND CHAPELS. On the Report of the Committee on the subject of the New Churches and Chapels, Mr. A. Bitow,tißdinped ,one part of the Bill would be revised; it was that which vested the whole power in the Bishop of removing a curate. The Hon. Gentleman •related a case as one in point, of a curate in his parish who had refused •the use of his pulpit for a charity sermon for the support of the Sunday school, whose conduct was nine months undecided on, by the case being taken flow the control of the Rector. The CHANCELLOR of the EYcuEQuert trusted it would be felt how much . .more-propey_it would be to enter into minute details . at a future time. But with respect to the case alluded to, as the law now stood, the Rector could not remove his Cu rate without the consent of the ,Bishop. The only.d.iticrence in the intended Act would be, that a Re , ..tor more than one Curate in a dia. pel, inWit remove one of them to a ditrerent one, where lie would become stationary. • Mr. GRANT, Sell. expressed himself happy, to hear ,that itwai intended to exrend.the principle of this cOmmission to the northern parts of the United Kingdom, where additional places of Wor ship were grievously wanted. 'lke Hon Gentle- Man, in a low voice, went into a sort of statisti cal statement of certain districts and parishes of Scotland, Which we understood him to say, had only one church in a space of 30, 40, and even 60 miles. This obliged the General Assklnbly to send out itinerant fin achers, at the expence of about 10001. a-year. The CHANCELLOR of the ExcnEtviEr., in answer to the Hon. Gentleman, said, he was happy to spear, that there Could he no indisposition on the part of Ministers to recommend to the House to rxteoll its liberality to the north as well as the south karts Of the kingdom. He was. not, how ever, pi epared to state any plan that could 'be offered for the support of the Church of Scotland; but the -subject shoidd be taken into that imale" diate consideration which its exigency appeared so imperiously to demand. When was recoi' ledreif What large samS hid been granted by the tooniOtence of Pm-fiat:lent for the iMprOvement of roads, the making of canals, and other commercial . facilities in the northern parts Of the kingdom, he was sure the House would not feel less desirous of affording- assistance to promote and 'extend the still more important objects of morality and giun, particularly when it was known *bat little districts were deprived of regular places of worship. —He must take this opportunity of saying, thfit he had been generally misunderstood in one part of what be had said . yesterday. It had been sup' posed, he had said, that no assistance was inten&i, ed to be afforded ro any place in which the inhO: bitauts did not amount to 10,000. He had said'. no such thing.' It was intended that the Com" missioners should have a general power to afford , aid in any way they may think will produce cite most immediate good. But it should be kept in Mind that the grant would very rarely afford considerable ass stance to large parishes, onlesse. great deal were done by parochial contributions and the liberal aid of individuals. • • I Mr. ‘VILBE,EFORCE was confident, that evert — if the measure were considered one of dry 'caletr`r lation, it would be admitted that the public ow."' 'ney could iu no *ay be so well expended as is that proposed. • koaats and Mr. BAR I NGTON severally gays. their apptobation to the •me.isare. lii ans..rer to a question lrutu Geheral Tmoittf• Tort, The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, It was not intended to propose env division Of, parish for a civil purpose; but that the King . ia* Council, on the representation of the Cootoqi' sinners, and with the consent of the PafrouP f . the (parish; should have the power of parish into trio parts, for ecclesiastical WO' poses only ; that in the. second, case, Oil. King should also have the power of divid.tt, it% into what are called District. r.srishes; . but that the incumbent o f t h e or igi na l, rich would retain the whole of .his; poc" .. er. A third point was, that certain pari t lteg.. should have one or, more Chapels of Elise, to 1). raised by the extension of the Tadiantentarr grants. But these three objects. were all distinct)? , • . pointed out in the Bill. The Resolution for granting the 1;006;0001.. 0 f Exchequer Bills was then agreed to.. 'The vat ions other Orders ot the Day were they agreed to, and the iluttse adjourned at a QurtO. before Eleven. . • From the LONDON - GAZETTE, Al Agcll l 7• March 16, 1818. His Royal Ifighoess the Prince Regent hitp been pleased, 'in - the name and on the behalf of his Majesty, to approve of .Mr. haae 11.n!Veeti, as 'Consul at , Gibraltar for his Majesty the &iv": ror of Ail the Russias. BANNRUPTCY ENLARGED, .1. Twobv, Plytuoutlt, toastr-rnariner, from March el t. Alay 4. BANKII.UPTcy SITPERSF.PED. 13. Walton, 13irnli0g11411., inerchat4. BA KR'TI9'S, J. and J. Wilson, Shiewsbury, drapers, April 7,8, 31(1 5 1' at eleven, at the Raven Shiewsburv• Atto rn i e s Mess r " . Clat he, Richards and Medcalf, Chatiejry,la . ne. , 0 • t J. Cohen, ;Manchester, hat-watinfaettirer, April 17, for, and April 28, at eleven, at the Star Inn, Alatichest l, " Attornies, Messrs. Cuttlige arid Kay, Manchester.• qSr ll.lloyeint, _inn. Newport, Shropshire, :liteher,'APri' at four; 2-4, and 2S, at ten, at the Red Lion Inn, Netvl'°' Attornies, Messrs. Master and It ovher, Forniea l's S. Ready, ..:outlianititun, dealer, April 9, at one,_ 9, at el vce 2: • and Vi 3, fit one, at the Star Inn, Sotitliainntint., Messrs. Flicks and Brailienriike, Bartlelt's-bnildings. W. Smith and P. F. Papillon, Mei ton, brid4e. Surrey, d", 1. : 1 April 7, at eleven„ 11, and 28, ai ten, at Guildhall. tornev, ;Ur. Barnes, Copt hall-court. • ell W. fl. Ware. Bow-street,Covent-garden, - rrinsie-s-iler,A.r%,",, 24, 31, anal April. 28, at one, at Guildhall. AttorneFill W. Smith, Bedford-row. T. Eeles, Cullier's 7 rents, Southwark, fellinouger - , - .7.13rr 4 2 ,t April 4, and 23, at twelve, at Guildhall. AttornieS, . H. and F. Bull, Hulks-street, CaveudiSli,square. DIVIDENDS. April 7, G. Ffttch, Chelmsford, -„,- 7 rO te tesliy• Lower Sbadwell, ship-owner-April 45, I. London-street, merchant-April i 1, J. Welchnian, Bradit IWiltsbire, linen-draper-April 9, T. Tucker, Newton 4 misfit, Devonshire, innholder-April G o „ n d r y, •L'otilT Shadwell, ta,p-malier,--April 14, N. Demezy, H ar tley W ill" ney, Southampton, innkeeper-April.7, C.. West; Buckle rs, , bury, warehouseman-April 7, A. Samuel, Altigalv, confectioner-April 13, S. Barker,' Norwich,..l' quor-Inerchant-April 13, T. Phillips,-Nomich, brandy-lo il ; chant-:ltch 2:3, 3. Walton, Bread-street, factor--M4 r .l, W. Adams and J. Edwards, Cumberland -street, square, pril - 11, E. Hiscocl'Al l iniVo i ll wooilen-drap yr-A pril 8, M. Doilimin, Norf . '" shopkeeper-April 10, J. Chambers, Sheffield, cutree,--Alqf. '24, P. and W. Pidg•eon; Stork Ekchange Cotlie-IMuse, keepers-April 9, J. Seaton, J, F. se:iton, It. Seal Ons 4 41 T. Foster, late of Pont, Tract. ,bankers--6 April 14, it• Lloyd, of' Chester, Wine-merchant-. - AprilFlopkt e sun, Nottingham, ciarier-April la, W. Brewer, cester, innliolder-April It;, J. Taylor, Walsall, Stal, shire, sadler's ironnionger-April I, 11. 1-1:-V: M. Wilsint, Liverpool, merchants-Apt il 14, .1. land-street, Oxford-street, cheesemon, , :er- . --April 14r• ,p, Jones, Liverpool, werchant:-April 13, .1. Goutlchild, .1. Goodchild, jun. and T. Junes, set. Bishop Weartne.l Dorhain, bankers-April 14, G. MorVille, Lancaster, and Harrison, lartinique, • merchants-April 7, C. JohliV,.y. Soul h Shields, linen-draper-April I t;-•7'. Weo, eftdo church-street, perfumer-May 9, T. and f. Lay Cock, , I ;7 , At ford, Yorkshire, dealers in oil-April I I, H. Chesney,rrfaol, Holborn, fringc-manufact er-April and J. Grall.jh Allertim-street, fluxion New Town, silk-weavers-Aprik o , Coll; 4t, Lli,hopsg ate street-within, merchant-Marcq • e . r . G. COWen, Groat Prescott-street, Gooilioart's-fields, 11)- chant-Apr I 7, 3. sin. Niehobis-lane, broker; CEIVI'IFiCA'ITS—ArittL 7. J. Oldham, Nlanchester, liquor-merchant—W. Jac l3°°° Sh,litun NlaPcti, Son:et set, grocer--A. Samuel, rcvt, confectioncr—J. Doswcl!, Winchoter, butclier - d. Johnston, North South--13mi, corn-factor—.J. Steelh e ' Moortoo, Pill,ington, Preston, LancashireP groo.•r—C. Grcct h,ni, Liverpool, grocer-W. Oakley, n' a f t coaclt-toa,ter—W. Pickton, Liver po,l, V. Wart, llirmirwhatn, tuerchaut--T. ;haws, Deretend.‘"r, ‘riclisti ire; picture-fr3zo e- AI h Cr—J. tinnggs, iiturietta - stree t, murcer—T.Jord,n,.l3Cl,lol, dealer. • PA RTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. • • W. Bodes, Loug,ithormigh, Fl - rson, andE. D• L'": 4 Nst: Leicester, lace-inaintfacturers—W. Wainwright and J. Downing, Nlauchestcr, merchants—W. Sectt and G. Brooll' Narrow wali, coal-nierchants---W. 'funky and W. • a p: I~uuwlc's court, wholesale glovers—ti. E. Eland and Eland, Aidgatt., IIigI)-street, linen-drapers—J. Hare a „ t e and I. Harphatu, Spalding, Lincolushire, l oaltsters-- 1 .• sod W. Boughton, Chepstow, cui'rivrq—W. Evcles, R• J Eccles, F. Bernard, 0. Keinan, ( 4 . K e „",11 1 : Df..nierary, merchant's , . (aS fi,r as relates to R. Leek' 3 " - Banar,l.) • -- • •• ___________ - - ,• •• . r: LONDON: Printed .113. 13. C.VIST.tIIVi, of .No. 29, `-'. r- 4 1 , f)rtnond-street, Queen-ignore; o.uf Imb:idled -hV 1: ' ' sl SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South Molr;m-street, at "Tfil; ;,u. Oifice, Z , :o. I 1 2., Strand ; wherV ...141visiiistveiitb OX lit" ' .. u ttees , &L., (Post-vaid) must be addrgssed.