The Sun. — London, England, 1836-09-06 00:00:00

al organic change that a bill was framed, having for its ob ject a restoration of the rights of the people, by which they could make free exercise of those rights by returning their representatives to Parliament. Now, then, I say the very same principle will be my guide hereafter, not to depart from those early lessons I have learned ; that principle I have long acted upon, and I must oppose any attempt to introduce election into the House of Lords. It was the opinion of one of the greatest philosophers and Statesmen of antiquity, Cicero, who laid down his opinion in more beautiful language than I can describe, that of all forms of government which he knew, he thought the best would be established by an union of the three existing forms—that was, the kingly, the aristocratical, and the democratical. The Government of England for centuries has been composed of those three estates ; we have had a constitution founded in that manner, under which we have prospered, and for God's sake do not let us, for any momentary disappointment, plunge ourselves into difficulties from which we cannot see our way out. I know that some ardent politicians, some persons loving freedom as well but no better than myself, have pointed to America, and have said, there you see an elective monarchy and an elective Upper House of Parlia ment all working well. I say, wait a little longer. You have not seen that system of government tried in any other part of the world. America is yet young ; wait and see What civil commotion will produce, when it rises up among them. It has been said that good can never come out of evil. I think we can see the prospects of some evil. I will ask whether America can do well under her accursed sys tem of slavery ? I will ask whether good can come out of such a system ? What is it that we can contemplate under it but civil war ? As the population increases, and those who are held in bondage become stronger, their anxiety to free themselves from their oppressors will increase, and we shall have the slave States in open hostility against the free States, and Tier Government will become as powerless as it is powerful at present. And then, gentlemen, we shall see whether they do not want some of that stability which our ablest and hest writers have attributed to an hereditary. monarchy, and an hereditary House of Lords."—Tinzes. Assuming, without admitting—for the result, we believe, in the eyes of the best informed, is extremely doubtful—that most of the proposed railroads will not only answer to the projectors, but be of national benefit, yet it is obvious to common justice that even this latter object, still less the former, ought not to he acquired, or attempted, at the expense of injustice, and sometimes even ruin, to individuals. Such, however, is, we fear, in no small degree the case. Many instances corrobo. rative of this we have ourselves heard of, and doubtless there must be many more, especially in the low er classes of life, where parties are not only not in a situa tion to see themselves righted, or even to make their wrongs known. We are taught to look upon our houses as our castles ; but it is surprising how merely theoretical such a notion becomes, when projectors, with a private Act of Parliament in their hands, can walk up to the door, demanding entrance and posses. s ion. " But, replies some one, " they cannot do so without making ample compenzation." To say no thing of local attachments, and other circumstances, for which net snm of money can afford compensation, there is too much reason to believe that great injus tice is exercised under colour of right, even whore the affair becomes a matter of easy valuation. We would instance, particularly, the very •comnion case what may he termed consequential damage—that of so much ?round is tnkino• is, when the mer not the oldv, or hv ineims the grrntest minty do:1 V 1 !e property is thcre:o y to th , .! proprietor; but vcl deteriorated in value to perhaps ten times the amount of the mere value of the land taken. We4iave heard of the insi:ance of a F. , ,-entleinan, time actual saleal)le value of whose estate was, in the opinion of compe tent judges, lessened betxeen 5,000/. and 6,0001. by portion'of land taken for, as well as by, the con tiguity of the railroad, yet who was compelled to take 1,000/. ; the Company even then dismissing their lirvevor for albwing him so much. Here the eon equential damage - is entirely overlooked ; yet were this persOn or his executors to sell the estate to morrow, they wou'd be losers to the extent of 4,0001. or 5,0001., because certain speculators, for their own or the public good, take it which way you will, armed with an Act of Parliament, can thus do him, under the colour of law, so grievous a wrong. We mention this ease, as we might several others, merely to eztablish the principle on which we set out, that it should be an invariable rule in cases of this kind that no w;ong should .be without its remedy ; and that for any actual injury, however extravagant it may appear in amount, an individual ought to be amply remunerated. Nor do the parsimony and injustice dealt out to pro prietors through whose lands and premises these lin pass, become the less obvious pared with the vast libe_ lectors towards themselves. remuneration paid to lawyers, surveyors, engineers, directors, secretaries, and the other members of the railroad staff, come to be contrasted with the niggardly bickerings which the landowner has to contend with, well enough may the latter complain of the hardship of his case, and conjecture that it is for the benefit of these persons, and not for public advantage, that lie finds his property deteriorated, and himself, sometimes, driven for ever from the home of his ancestors. Whe ther any of the new rules instituted by Parliament upon this subject, towards the close of the late Ses sion, will meet the evil we have thus alluded to, we are not aware; but this we feel convinced of, that as the wrong is done under the authority of Parliament, that assembly should take especial ‘care to shake off the imputation, by steadfastly keeping in mind, and realising, the well-known constitutional maxim, that there shall be no wrong without a remedy.—Morning Herald. nd striking, ~ vhen coin llity displayed by those pro- When the extravagant The Government papers are " putting forth a feeler," as the phrase is, on the subject of Johnny Russell's probable success, should that lackadaisacal little man stand for East Cumberland, in the event of a general election. Monstrous " intrepidity of face !" But the fa r ct is, that these poor tools of a tottering Ministry are absolutely bemazed at their astonishing triumph over no opponent. And, under the intoxication of delight, they seem disposed to set to work at a distri bution of the county representation throughout the empire among their pitiful partisans. Is it possible that the poor people can have forgotten the repeated drubbing s with which, during the last session, John Bull visited their contemptible policy whenever a con tested election afforded an opportuntty for so doing ? But, even supposing that this had been otherwise, and that the Conservatives had not, as they undoubtedly have, the support of the county constituencies—a fact, by the way, which the clumsy scribes might have learned from the speeches and letters of their master, O'Connell —even in that case, what, in the name of commo n sense and decency, are the claims of Lord John .Russell on the constituency of East Cumberland ? What would the sturdy yeomanry of that fine county think on beholding an insignificant little body standing forward to solicit their suffrages on 0 no assignable grounds, that we can conceive, other than the wretched distinction of having blindly, or, rather, with calculating selfishness, devoted himself to the will of that beggarly demagogue, whose latest de nunciation of Englishmen is directed a ga i nst t h e par ticular class of the county constituencies ? The shrewd and independent electors of Cu m b er l and would, by the sound of his Lordships name , be rem i n d e d that he belongs to a Whig family of great wealth and political influence ; and they would naturally inquire how it was that the Home Secretary could not obtai n a seat for some county with which that noble family has connection. Judge of their astonishment when informed that he once had the honour of representing a county in which he was well known, and from which the public spirit and nationality of that county indignantly expelled him ! The Cumberland cicctors would then learn that, by t h at j o bbi ng f or which the Whigs stand pre eminent, his Lordship wriggled himself in for Stroud, just as his worthy colleague, Lord Palmerston, when also ejected hi the feeling of an English county, sneaked in as the adequate representative of the Radicals of Tiverton. Well, indeed, may O'Connell and his Ministerial gang abuse the county constituen cies of England ! They are by far the most formida ble foes of the faction. But, to return to East Cum berland,—can there be a doubt that the result of such an inquiry as we have supposed into the political pretensions of Lord John Russell - would be his con temptuous rejection ? Nor could he claim much re spect on personal grounds. Even in an Adminis tration adorned by the talents and graces of a Rice, a Palmerston, and a Morpeth, we much doubt whether Russell be not the name most strongly suggesting considerations unfavourable to a public man. But this point we have rr • ish to urge. His Lordship is as vigorous-mi n d e d, manly, intelligent, , 1 and accomplished a person as nature intended ; and there we leave him, with the simple repetition that if he be, as we have shown, politically contemptible, it is no less sure that the electors of Cumberland would not find him personally a Minister of much distinc tion. It may, perhaps, be thought that we have be stowed too mu c h ti m e in considering this stupid spe culation on the part of the Government prints. We are inclined to think otherwise. Those unwearied hacks would not have stirred in so ridiculous a busi ness had they not received instructions from head quarters. It was thus our duty to admonish Lord Johnny of the utter folly and extreme impertinence of such a person as his Lordship supposing that he could ride a cockhorse astride the Reform Bill through a strange county, after having been so contumeliously kicked out of Devonshire, where his merits, whatever these may be, had a fair chance of being appre ciated. And so, indeed, it seems they were.—Tdorn ing Post. • ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. NORTHERN CIRCUIT.—L4xcAsTzR, SEPT. 3. DOE DEM TATHAM, V. WRIGHT. The case for the defendant was concluded this morning. Mr. CRESSWELL then, in a speech which occupied the Court for seven hours, and was not finished at the usual hour of adjournment, addressed the jury for the plaintiff. It is understood that he will resume his address on Monday morning, and the examination of witnesses will then be commenced. WESTMINSTER SESSIONS. AN UNNATURAL SON.—Julia Barry, an aged woman, was indicted for assaulting her son, a stout young Irish shoe maker. The poor woman pleaded guilty. Mr. PHILLIPS (to the prosecuting son)—What! prose cute that aged mother of yours for an assault upon you, a strong young man ? The prosecutor answered the Learned Counsel sharply, and proceeded to state the case against his parent in a roundabout way, complaining of family grievances. CHAIRMAN—Let us know what the assault is. cuter—She threw a jug at me, and cut my head. CHAlRMAN—Anything else ? Prosecutor—She is always abusing Me. CHAIRMAN—Do you want us to send your own mother to prison ? Prosecutor—l only want protection. 'CHAIRMAN (to the defendant)—You have pleaded guilty, and therefore you must be fined. Avoid your son for the future ; the Court awards you to pay a fine of Is. Defendant (crying)—l have not a shilling in the world. CHAIRMAN—Never mind ; we will lend it you. You are discharged. Prose- POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HO USE. Edward Con and Bridget Con, his mother, were brought before the Lord MAY oft. A labouring man named Even don, from Merry-worth, in the county of Kent, got on board the steam-vessel at Gravesend for the- purpose of coming to London, and entered into - conversation with the male prisoner and his mother, soon aftqr which he missed his silver watch. He had, in order to save money, walked twenty-five miles to Gravesend, and was going to see his child in London, and the loss of his watch was terrible to him. Ann Kilby was on board the Diamond when the prose cutor, who seemed to be struck with amazement and joy at the novelty,- was talking to the prisoners. When the prosecutor missed his watch, the passengers pitied him greatly, and advised that the two persons-should be searched and in the male prisoner's coat pocket, wrapped up in his handkerchief, the watch was found. The passengers were all extremely indignant at the robbery, and were anxious to give him a ducking and a kicking, and to go to no fur ther trouble about the fellow, and the female prisoner, td though they pretended td be strangers to each other, showed so much uneasiness at the young man's condition, that the witness thought the relationship must be very close. Mr. John - Mills searched the male prisoner, and found the waich in his pocket. The male prisoner had a watch of his own too, which he said he found in a closet. The passengers were of opinion that the mother knew nothing of the robbery. Bridget Con could give no explanation on the subject, as she never saw the watch. Edward Con, who is believed to be a thimble rigger, d not know how on earth the watch got into his pocket: was really quite a mystery to him. The Loin MAYOR—You were g oin g to the thimble rir at the fair, and you thought to keep your hand in practice. Edward Con—No. I am not a rigger. The LORD MAYOR discharged the female, and comm ted the young man for trial at the Maidstone assizes. 130 IV- STREET. Yesterday, Thomas Lztcomb, the serjeant of police, and clerk to the F division, who stands charged with having stolen 186/. 10s. in gold, from the station-house, was brought up for further examination before Sir P. ROE. Mr. Robinson, of Ilatton-garden, attended for the pri soner ; Mr. Ray, the Receiver to the Metropolitan Police, was also present to watch the proceedings. The following additional evidence was taken : Richard Staton proved that between one and two o'clock on Wednesday, the 31st of August (the day of the rob bery), he called at the station-house to see Inspector Mor gan, but was told that he could not be seen before three o'clock. James Soper, a sergeant of the P. division, proved that on Wednesday last, about five or ten minutes past one o'clock, he saw the prisoner walking under the piazzas of Drury-lane Theatre, in a direction towards Drury-lane, and saw him turn into Princes-street. He had a handkerchief up to his face, but there was nothing particular about his appearance. He was walking along at a moderate pace. Abraham Lyons, who was talking to the last witness at the time in question, also saw the prisoner, and observed, " Here comes your clerk." William Field, a police-constable, was at the station house on the day in question, at about a quarter past one o'clock. He bad received orders to attend to have his clothing inspected, and at the time in question he placed his clothing in the cell at the left-hand corner of the yard. While there he observed the prisoner come from the pas sage into the yard. He turned to go into the water-closet, and then made one step forwards with his face towards wit ness. He then went to a place where the dust was put on one side, there being an accemmodation for the men on the other side. The prisoner stood there for about two mi nutes, and then went into the passage. At that time no other person was in the yard except witness and a consta ble named Sweeney. William Maberley, another constable, stated that be tween five minutes and a quarter past one o'clock he saw the prisoner come from his room in the station, and go out. Some time after he came up to the door in the direction from Russell-street. He appeared in a great bustle, and as he passed witness he asked him if Mr. Hartley, the so perintendant, had come down. Witness remarked to him self that he appeared agitated, and having remained at the door about two minutes longer, he (witness) went into the yard, and saw the prisoner in the act of retiring from the place of accommodation for the men opposite to the dust hole. Mrs. Elizabeth Olen proved that she keeps a lodging house at No. 43, Stanhope-street, Clare-market. The prisoner had lodged with her up to the period of the rob bery. On Wednesday last, about a quarter past one o'clock, the prisoner came home. He came into witness's parlour and asked for the key of his room, which she gave him. He asked if " Louisa" or any one else had called, and she replied in the negative. He then went up stairs with the key of his room, but witness could not say whether or not he went into his room. In a few minutes after he returned down stairs again and gave her the key. He did not leave any message with her to deliver to any person who might call. He then went out and returned again at 6 o'clock, and after remaining a few minutes again went out. By the prisoner's Solicitor—lt was a common thing for the prisoner to ask if any one had called during his absence from home. He had nothing in his hand when he came home on the first occasion. not isli s r aY w hi e l , Hartley, i the Superintendent of the division, deposed that, on Wednesday l as t, or th e d a y p rece di ng , h e co uld he gave an order directing Constable Page, No. 36, should be taken to the E station-house. The pri soner,wahs given, oaeted as clerk, was the person to whom the order w He did not say at what time Page was to go, or by whom he was to be accompanied, but left his directions to be fulfilled in the usual way. It was the duty of the prisoner to be in attendance at the station-house from nine in the mornin g until eight in the evening, but he was allowed to go to his dinne r at three o'clock, and to his tea at seven. Between the hours of nine and three o'clock the prisoner had no business to leave the station without permission. The prisoner made no report to witness of the money having been stolen, nor did he know of it until he was informed of it by Inspector Mason. Prisoner—Perhap3 your Worship will ask Mr. Hartley whether he did not send me down to Scotland-yard with the report of the money having been stolen, in which report In spector Mason was implicated. Sir F. ROE-I do not think that question has anything to do with the case. The witness, in answer to a question by Mr. Robinson, admitted that the prisoner had been absent during the hours prescribed for his duty on other occasions. Inspector Mason re-sworn—The keys of all the ine spectors' cupboards arc different. Witness had only one key to his cupboard. He had never lost it, and did not know of any similar key. He had left his key in the cup. board at different times, but it had always been returned to him by one of the inspectors. He had never had it from the prisoner Lucomb. John Brown, of the White Hart, in Drury-lane, proved that on the day of the robbery he went over to the station house to see one of the inspectors respecting a robbery which had taken place at his own house. He had a con versation upon the subject with the inspector Morgan in the charge-room at the station. It was then a few minutes after one o'clock. Before he left the station, Morgan, to the best of his recollection, had left the room, but two or three persons, including the constable who took down his deposi tion, remained in the room when witness went away. Hymns, the Jew, was recalled, and swore that the state ment he had given on the former occasion was true. t The whole of the evidence was then over, and the pri soner's solicitor put several questions to the witnesses who had been first examined, but nothing material was elicited. Winter, the door-keeper, said that when the prisoner left the station to go to dinner he had nothing in his hand. Sir F. ROE then said, that although no property had been found and nothing of a positive nature , proved against the prisoner, he thought the evidence sufficiently strong to send the prisoner for trial. Mr, Robinson asked if bail would be accepted ? Sir F. ROE replied in the negative, observing that be should bind over all the witnesses now, and remand the pri soner until Thursday next. The prisoner was accordingly remanded. THE SUN, LONDON, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1536. HATTON-GARDEN: Sarah Chamberlane, a lady residing at No. 1, Suffolk place, Lower-road, Islington, was brought from the station house and placed at the bar, charged by Mr. Charles Mer ritt, poulterer, of No. 2, Lower -street, Islington, with having stolen a fowl, his property. Mr. Merritt, yesterday morning, at eleven o'clock, was in his shop, when he saw the prisoner take a fowl lying in the shop front, and run away. He instantly pursued her and took her into custody, with the property in her possession. Prisoner—l did not run away ;lam in the habit of walking fast. Mr. LAING (to the prisoner)—Pray, what are you ? Prisoner—l am a married lady, and live with my husband. Mr. LAING—Pray, what is your husband Prisoner —He is a gentleman, I expended all my money, and I took the fowl with the intention of paying for it when I got home. Mr. Chamberlane, her husband, an elderly man, who eras much excited, here stepped forward, and said that she was not in her proper senses, and that she was frequently in the habit of bringing home cabbages, fowls, butcher's meat, and other trifling articles, which she paid for on her arrival at her residence. Mr. LAING—Pray what are you, Sir ? Mr. Chamber lane—l am a gentleman ;my father was the High Sheriff of Nottingham ; and she, being in respectable circum stances, had no occasion to steal so trifling an article. Mr. LAING—Have you any family ? Mr. Chamberlane —I have, Sir, daughters who are now at home. I have been married to her twenty-three years. Her sister and another relation, died in a Lunatic Asylum at Notting ham ; and she has plenty of money at her command ; but I ara - cautious as to letting her leave home, with much at a time. Mr. Merritt—She came the other day to my shop for a half ounce of cheese, but r refused to serve her with so trifling a quantity, and she left the shop. Mr. Chamberlanc—She has frequently taken out 101., and she has returned without any, but she has brought home a cabbage, or some other trifling article, which has beeh paid'for, and I have been at a loss as to what she has done with the money. She has taken considerable sums and concealed them—it is most lamentable for me. Mr. LAING asked her what she had to say to the charge? Prisoner (coolly)—I will never do it again if you will look over it this time. Mr. LAING—You may depend upon it if you are ever brought here again under similar circumstances you will be punished ; it is only for the sake of your husband, and not yourself, that 'you now escape. Mr. Charnberlane pledged himself that he would do evory thing in his power to prevent a repetition of such conduct, and consult with his friends as to the necessity of placing her under proper restraint, and she quitted the office under. his protection. Mary Qailler, aged 20, and Elizabeth Quilter, who slid she was lwr mother, aged about 50, were placed at the bar, charged with being drunk, and on suspicion of stealing a fine child about two years of age. On Sunday morning, about two o'clock, the prisoners were found in the Bagnigge Wells-road, in a beastly state of intoxication, and the child was lying on the ground, dripping wet, during the heavy rain. They were taken to the station-house, and on being questioned they made contradictory statements as to who and what they were, and their possession of the infant. , The younger prisoner said that the child belonged to her, and that it was born in the country, but ultimately said that it was born in Isling ton. The elder prisoner said that she came from the county of Kerry, in Ireland, three months ago, at the request of her daughter, to nurse the child, but she could not tell where she or the other prisoner lived. Mr. LAING said that he would most assuredly commit them to prison unless they gave him a more satisfactory account of themselves, as he had a strong suspicion that the child had been stolen ; and they then referred to a woman named Foley, of Fox -court, Gray's-inn-lane, who . refused to attend, but returned an answer that she believed the child belonged to Mary Quilter. Mary Hollogan, of Park-street, Islington, stated that the younger prisoner lodged in her house, and she was led to believe that the child was her illegitimate offspring. Mr. LAING discharged the prisoner, but he still enter tained a suspicion that the child did not belong to her. The child was neatly clad, very interesting in appearance, and had a plated spoon and coral necklace ; the prisoners, on the contrary, were extremely shabby and dirty. MARLBORO U GH- STREET. A most ill-looking dirty fellow, who gave his name as James Dixon, was brought up, charged with lurking abou the Nag's Head, in Oxford -street, last night, under suspi. cious circumstances. The policeman stated that the prisoner went along the street feeling each door if it was fastened, and pushing it as if he desired to force his way in. When the prisoner saw that he was watched he made off ; but the policeman, after a little while, saw him again near the Nag's Head, and finding that he was entering the yard of the inn, took him into custody. The MAGISTRATE inquired what the prisoner was by occupation ? Prisoner—l am in the pencil and sponge line ; I travel about the country, and supply a regular round of customers. I went down last week to Windsor, and having disposed of my stock, had come up to obtain a fresh supply of articles in my way. It is utterly impossible to carry on a respectable business like mine, if every police man has the power to take me up ; my character may suffer in the end, and my clientele may be displeased. MAGlSTRATE—clientele. Why do you understand French ? Prisoner—l should think so. lam not a com mon person, but a man of morals and education ; I have travelled to many countries I assure you. Here a policeman entered the office, and recognised the prisoner as a man who had returned some time ago from transportation, and who had been taken up a few weeks ago for annoying gentlemen by thrusting sponges into their faces at the White Horse Cellar, Piccadilly. He had been taken up for a robbery in Paris about ten years ago, and narrowly escaped being sent to the bagne at Brest. The prisoner could not deny the truth of this state ment, and was ordered to find security for his good be haviour, notwithstanding his being a man of " morals and education." A respectable female made the following application to Mr. CHAMBERS :—A young French girl had been sent over to this country to complete her education, and for some time had been residing with her godmother, a cele brated west-end milliner. The aunt of ,the girl, a woman of indifferent character, had contrived to get possession of her niece, and was at present making arrangements to carry her out to some distant settlement. As it was pre sumed that the aunt's object in so acting was not a correct one, she (the applicant) wished to know if the Magistrate would grant a warrant in order to have the parties brought before him. Mr. CHAMBERS inquired why the godmother did not make the application in person ? The applicant answered that the godmother was not sufficiently acquainted with English, and had. therefore de puted her to make the inquiry. She was fearful that the aunt intended some harm to the niece, who was a girl of remarkable attractions. Mr. CHAMBERS said it was absurd to suppose the aunt could have such views, for if her object was profit it was unlikely she would romove her from .the metropolis, where so many facilities for such nefarious . practi ces ex i s t e d. If the girl had been taken away from the custody of her guar dians it required no warrant to regain possession of her. He should recommend the proper parties to demand the resto ration, and if a breach of the peace ensued it would then he time for the Bench to interfere. The applicant then withdrew. MARYLEBONE. Thomas Graham, a chimney-sweeper, was charged by Spreadborough, D 160, with being drunk in Oxford-street the previous day, and beating his wife. The wife was not present. The constable found the prisoner beating the woman with a strap, refusing to desist, he took him into custody. Mr. RAWLINSON (to prison)—What have you to Gay? Prisoner—Vy, yer Vorship, I'm worry sorry to appear be fore you on sich a black suit ; but my vifc's a bad lot— leaves her home and helpless babbies to go vith her pals and drink gin ; yesterday morning as ever vO2, I met her, and she vos drunk. " Oh, my tulip," says I, " you've been at it again," and, consequently, jist gave her a tap with my belt." Mr. RAWLINSON-But you were drunk yourself, Mr. Graham, and to check that crime you are fined ss. Yesterday Count Fitzgerald Teisistro, a dashingly dressed military-looking gentleman, who for a considerable period resided at Long s, and other hotels, but latterly at No. 5, Cannon-row, Westminster, was brought up on a warrant by Morrison, an officer of this establishment, on the charge of having sent a letter to Mr. Phineas Coyne, surgoon, 13, Bulstrode-street, Manchester-square, for the purpose of provoking him to fight a duel. Mr. Coyne some time ago met the Count at the house of a friend. He (the Count) was, from some cause or other, desired to leave, and in the course of a few days he called upon Mr. C. to know why he had been turned out. Mr. C. said he knew nothing about the matter, and he then went away, but soon afterwards wrote to several of his friends, telling them that he meant to destroy himself by cutting his throat, and that before they could receive intimation of his intention, his spirit would have passed into another world. After this, he sent by a friend of his (Captain Pratt) a challenge to Mr. C., who said that he had no wish to have daything to do with the Count, who, if he annoyed him any more, would be given in charge to the police. The letter set forth that the Count had cut his throat, but not effec tually, and that he was determined either to shoot Mr. Coyne, or be killed himself. On the 11th of August the Count met Mr. Coyne in Marylebone-street, and assaulted him with a whip which he carried ii his hand, exclaiming, " Mr. Coyne may now consider himself to have been horse whipped by the Count." Mr. Coyne concluded by stating that the Count had caused the occurrence, on the following Sunday, to appear in the Observer. The Count, who said that he could, if he thought proper, enter into certain details connected with the affair, did not deny either the challenge or the assault. He was ordered to find bail, himself in 2001. and two sureties in 1001. each for keepin g the peace, and on leav ing the office he was arrested by Levy, the Sheriff's-officer, of Newman-street. Q UEEN-SQUARE. John Herman, a boy about thirteen years of age, was yesterday placed at the bar before Mr. BURRELL, charged with having robbed his father of a silver watch, and 2s. 6d. in money. The unfortunate parent, who for many years served as a soldier, and left his regiment with credit, stated that the prisoner was incorrigible. The depositions were taken by order of the worthy Ma gistrate for his commitment for trial. W ORSHIP-S7'REET. Yesterday Sarah Paul was placed at the bar before Mr. BROUGHTON, charged with breaking the windows of Mr. Richard Paul, fur-skin dresser, Seward -street, St. Luke's. G 60 stated to the Magistrate that it was a complicated affair, as the prisoner said she was the complainant's wife, but which was denied by him. The prisoner asserted that the complainant was her hus band ; that she called on him on Saturday last, that being her wedding day, to endeavour to prevail on him to allow her a separate maintenance. Upon his refusing, she broke the window. Mr. BROUGIITON, to complainant—Are you , married to her ? Complainant—She has been my wife occasionally. Prisoner (handing) in a document—Here is the certifi cate of my marriage, your worship, which occurred '22 years ago at Christ Church, Newgatc-street. I was married on a Saturday. _ _ Mr. BROUGHTON (to complainant)—On your oath, are you not married ? Complainant—On my oath I am not married. Prisoner—l have my bridesmaid here, who was present at my marriage. _ _ _ Mr. BROUGIITON having read the certificate, which stated that the marriage was solemnized between the com plainant and Mary Collins, The complainant said that he was never married to Sarah Collins. Mr. BROUGHTON explained to his complainant that in the event of taking a false oath, he was liable to seven years' transportation or the pillory. The complainant was perfectly aware of the consequences of perjury. " That woman is not my wife, but Sarah Col lins is. She is not Sarah Collins." Prisoner—That is the man I am married to, and I was married in 1814. I have had seven children by him, and the eldest (a son) is 21 years of age.. Mr. BRouoirroN Where is the woman you were married to ? Complainant—She died six weeks after I was married to her, and was buried in Clerkenwell churchyard. Mr. BROUGHTON—HOW came this woman to get the certificate ? Complainant—l cannot say. Mary Miers, sister of the prisoner, was present at the marriage. Her sister's maiden name was Sarah Vander. It was only lately that he had asserted that the prisoner was not his wife. The prisoner said that she took the name of Sarah Col lins from a desire not to let her family become acquainted with her intention. Sarah Maguire, who is married to the complainant's bro ther, had known him 26 years, during the whole of which time she understood that they were married. Within the last few weeks he bad denied it. Mr. BROUGHTON—Was Mary Miers pr'esent at your marriage ? Complainant—No ; a woman and the parish clerk were present,•and they are both dead. Mr. BROUGHTON observed, that the certificate had all the appearance of authenticity about it, and that it was not likely that the parish clerk would put down the name of a person who was not present. The complainant was quite willing to abide by the laws of his country. The complainant then signed his evidence. The prisoner was told to prosecute the complainant for peijury, and she was discharged. UNION-HALL. Henry Stockwell, a middle-aged man, whose tattered clothes bespoke distress, was charged with stealing a salt seller and some other articles, from the door of a broker's shop in Walworth, at which they were exposed for sale. A gentleman, who stated that he was the brother-in-law of the prisoner, and that he had been abroad for the last 27 years, and being an extraordinary linguist, had filled some very confidential situations. He had, however, returned to this country about two months ago, and brought consi derable property with hi,n, all of which was either squan dered away, or had been taken from him, as he had latterly exhibited decided symptoms of insanity. He, the relative, was not aware what he had been latterly doing, but having been apprised that he was in custody on a charge of felony, he had therefore come forward to describe his state of mind. Mr. TRAILL said that if the accused was labouring under insanity, it would be better to have him placed under some restraint, so that he would have no opportunity of repeating such an act as that with which he was charged. The broker said, that under the circumstances, he had no wish to press any charge against the accused. The accused did not speak a word during the investiga tion, and it was stated by his relation that for days together he was in the habit of maintaining a profound silence. LAMBETH-STREET. Yesterday, Thomas Prior, an old man 64 years of age, who has been for some years a cook in the Parochial Workhouse of St. Ann's, Limehouse, and who has been always considered as a man of most rigid moral character, was placed within the felon's bar, before Messrs. HARD WICK and COMBES, on a criminal charge of administering arsenic to a female who was in a state of pregnancy by him, with a view of producing abortion. The charge was brought before the Magistrates by the Overseers of the parish, who were in attendance, in consequence of some communications which had been made to them on that morning. Rods Meade, a very ordinary female, of 32 years of age, but who appears to be upwards of 50, for nearly two years past was an inmate of the workhouse of St. Ann's, Limehouse, and was generally employed in assisting in the kitchen, where the prisoner was cook. About six or seven months ago an improper intimacy took place between her and the prisoner, and she in consequence became preg nant. On discovering the state she was in, she, about three months ago, mentioned her situation to prisoner, who told her she must have something to cause her to miscarry, and brought something in a bottle for her to take. This was about three months ago, and on taking a spoonful of the mixture, which had a white sediment at the bottom, she became very ill, and vomited a good deal ; but, owing to the attention of the parish doctor, and taking what be had administered, she became better, and recovered. She had twice since, at the request of the prisoner, taken similar doses from the bottle, but they had not produced the de sired effect. Mr. Warring, the beadle of the parish, in consequence of a communication made to him on that morning by a female with whom the last witness had slept on the previous night, questioned Meade, and she made a similar statement to him as that which she had detailed in evidence. He then exa mined a cupboard in the kitchen belonging to the prisoner, and there found the bottle which he then produced, and which corresponded in every respect with the one from which the last witness said the dose had been given to her by the prisoner. He also found a paper containing a quan tity of white powder, and upon which the words " arsenic, poison," were written. On asking the prisoner how these articles came into his possession, he said that he had pur chased the arsenic to poison the black beetles with : he, however, said nothing about the bottle. Mr. Burn, the parish surgeon, about three months ago, _ _ had been sent for to attend the female Meade, and on going to the workhouse he found her labouring under what he, at the time, suspected to be cholera. She appeared to be very sick at the stomach, and reached violently. He, on that occasion, administered those remedies usual in cho lera cases, and the patient gradually recovered. From the circumstances described to him by Meade, as well as from her appearance, he had no doubt she was five months ad vanced in pregnancy. He had no doubt also that the powder produced was arsenic, and that the sediment in the bottle produced contained a portion of that poison. In reply to a question from one of the Magistrates, Mr. Burn said that a portion of arsenic taken into the stomach would have produced the symptoms under which the female laboured when he had been first called in to see her. Mr. HARDWICK, to the prisoner —What have you got to say to the charge of administoring poison to this female ? Prisoner—What I mean to say is that I did not give any poison to her. Now Rhoda, I wish to ask you what I said to you when I first showed you the paper with the ar senic in it ? Prosecutrix—You said you must not touch this as it would do away with you. The prisoner was remanded to a future day in order to give time to Mr. Burn to analyze the contents of the bottle produced. It appeared that the prisoner had in the first instance tried the effect of the poison on an old and favourite cat, which he had for some years, and having administered too strong a dose ‘ the animal died by the experiment. He is a married man, and has always been considered not only very moral but very religious. SINGULAR CASE. Some time ago a man named Swain, formerly of the Ca tholic priesthood, but discarded from that body for miscon duct, was charged at the New Bailey, Manchester, with stealing some clothes from the house of the Rev. Mr. Kay, Catholic priest, of this town, and being, on his trial, found guilty, he was sentenced to imprisonment in the New Bailey. Shortly after his release he was charged by his . wife, a woman of prepossessing appearance and manners, with brutally assaulting her, and in d , afault of sureties, was once more sent to prison. Again, after his release, she once more appeared against him before the Magistrates, much reduced in circumstances and condition, and com plained that he had assaulted her ferociously when in an advanced state of pregnancy, and accompanied his violence with most disgusting prayers against her coming progeny. For the third time he was sent to prison. He had not been long at large when he and his wi Fe were brought under the eye of the law upon suspicion of having scalded to death the infant against which he had taken so revolting a pre possession, and upon the inquiry before the Coroner they narrowly escaped committal for trial on the charge of murder. Subsequently to that time Swain went over to Ireland, and, practising upon the kindly feelings of a gen tleman who had known him in his boyhood, and to whom he represented himself as a convert to Protestantism, he obtained a letter of recommendation from the Archbishop of Dublin to the Bishop of Quebec ; money was given him to convey him to Quebec, letters to parties in England who could aid his object were also furnished, and his name was creditably put before the world by those who were ignorant of his recent history. Instead, however, of going to Que bec the man returned to Manchester, where he has been playing strange antics on the faith of the new character be had fabricated for himself in Ireland. On Monday this same Richard Swain was placed at the bar of the New Bailey, in company with a female named Anne Archer, charged with having written a fraudulent character for the usz: of Archer, by means of which she obtained needlework and appropriated it to her own pur poses. The prisoner, with his wife, was lodging in the same house as Archer, and two witnesses were brought forward, one of whOm saw him writing, and another saw when it was written, the fictitious document in question. Mr. Thomas felt it his duty to state that he had received information that the prisoner had lately been in Ireland, ob tained from the Archbishop of Dublin letters of credit to the Archbishop of Quebec in the character of a converted Romish Priest, and had afterwards abstracted the letter from its envelope, and used it in obtaining money from several gentlemen in Manchester. He asked time, there fore, to make inquiries into this matter. Swain said it was a very great hardship upon him that he should be detained on a charge of which he was innocent. Mr. Poster differed from him in opinion, and the pri soners were remanded to Wednesday. On Wednesday they were again brought up. The ori ginal charge, involving Archer, could not be satisfactorily made out ; but the second charge against Swain, of having obtained money by means of the letter above-named, was gone into. The Rev. G. Dugard, librarian of the College, deposed that the prisoner called on him, represented himself as a re formed Catholic Priest, showed a letter from the Archbishop of Dublin, and, professing that his aim was to get a little morp'y to help him forward to Quebec, lie did give him 55., though he told the man he thought he was acting very un wisely in so doing. He also told him that he did not think the Archbishop's letter was any recommendation to him. [This letter, from the Archbishop of Dublin to the Bishop of Quebec, stated that "on examination he found him, Swain, far too ignorant to be employed at present in the Ministry, but lie may, perhaps, be enabled to maintain him self by teaching Latin and Spanish (having been at Seville), or as a clerk in some mercantile house, till he shall have acquired the requisite knowledge." The Archbishop also dwells on the " deficiency in the first rudiments of Scriptural knowledge with which Maynooth sends out labourers in the vineyards."] The Reverends Piccope and Hollist were next called upon, but they did not appear, Swain stating coolly that Mr. Piccope was absent in Wales. The Rev. W. Nunn, however, deposed to the prisoner having duped him by the same means as in the case of Mr. Dugard. The Rev. H. Fielding was called, but he did not appear, and Swain manifested a nervous desire to put a stop to the exposure by saying he pleaded guilty to all the cases yet adduced, but as to Mr. Fielding, lie did not authorise him to use his name, and he had not, therefore, done so. Mr. Bagshaw said the prisoner had made all parties by turns his dupes, and the objects of his vilificat on. He had in his hand a letter which the man wrote when in prison against Catholic Priests in this town, mentioning each by name, and charging one of them with having a concubine in his house. The man vilified every body that came across him, when it suited his purpose. Mr. Greaves askedtheprisoner if he had any witnesses ? Swain--Witnesses 1 for what purpose ? Mr. Greaves—For any purpose. Mr. Norreys—Have you Mr. Buckley here, to say he gave you that advice ? Swain—l do not say advice ; but I acted upon his words. Mr. Lingard—To prove the sincerity of this man's con version I may mention that when I told him that I must write to the Archbishop respecting him, he said if I did so he must inevitably return to the bosom of the Roman Catholic Church, where he would be welcomed. Swain (with affected horror)—Mr. Lingard, Mr Lin gard, I said you would drive me to it. I wish you would produce my letter. Mr. D. D. Foulkes said he had just been applied to de fend the prisoner, but after what had passed he had no ques tions to ask. Swain—As God is my judge, and as I expect salvation at a future day, I acted from dire necessity alone-4 thought I was doing for the better, as God is my judge. I have a soul to be saved. Mr. Greaves—lf you cared for that you would not have done as you have done. You have been already committed for assaulting your wife ; imprisoned for felony— Swain—Only for three months. Mr. Greaves—You have been tried before the Coroner for the murder of your own child. Swain—Honourably acquitted of that, your Worship— honourably acquitted of that. Mr. Norreys--Your wife swore, in my presence, that you exercised your spiritual influence (if I may use the word) over her for the most diabolical purposes ; and that when she was near her confinement you prayed before God Almighty that the child might be born a monster, and she came to swear to the fact in a state of the greatest terror before the magistrates. That, she said, was your constant prayer. Swain—As God is my judge— A man stated that when he was watchman in Hanover street he heard a noise, and on going up stairs he found the prisoner holding his child by the heels on the bed and beat ing it. Swain (somewhat discomposed)—Good God, you never saw me do such a thing. The man—l did. Swain—That is not the case, for no person was pre sent.—(Laughter.) Mr. Bagshaw could produce a witness who saw him strike his child in such a manner that he thought his in tention was to kill it. Swain—l admit that I did correct it ; but do me the justice to send for my wife. - - - Mr. Grcaves— ou are the greatest monster that ever came before me. A wretch like you ought to be sent from the face of the earth. Swain—Send for my wife, and do me justice. Mr. Greaves said she had no wish to see him, and after again expressing his regret that the law a uthorised no greater security, h e committed the prisoner for three months to hard labour.— Wheeler's Manchester Chrouicle. It appears fiom a statement laid before the late ,eientilie fleeting at Bristol, that in Glasgow alone upwards of sixty new churches are wanting to accommodate the enor mously increased population of that place. Active steps are said to be in progress for calling a county meeting to be held at Hereford, for the purpose of con sidering the practicability and probable advantages of a Rail way communication between the two cities of Gloucester and Hereford through Ledbury. THE MARKETS. CORN EXCHANGE.—SEPT. 5. In the past week the arriv a l s o f most kinds of gra'e, were tolerably good ; and of Flour moderate. The weatba was chiefly fine, with some showers a t interval s, the trade for all articles remained steady at former Priteeli This morning there has been a mod e r a te fresh supp l y l in sorts of Corn, and the new samples of Wheat still corner worse condition than last year. The Wheat trade has be generally dull at the terms of this day se'nnight, but fine 1 ,4 old obtained last week's prices readily. Barley continues last quoted, and the new comes mostly fit for the maltst.eri. use. Beans Ere firm at former rates. Pease of both kl are slow of sale, at the terms of last Monday. The for Oats has slackened, and the prices of this day week ant 8 e t barely supported. The Flour trade remains with out alteration. PRICES ON BOARD OF SHIP. Wheat, Red (old) 42s Ws. Beans, Small (new) ............ .f.'. -"S‘ ...j. -White (old)..„ 465. 563. .. .. _,: 54 ,. - lied 18.36) 4os. 445. - Tick (new) .......... ;,,„. ------- Fine 445. 463. •-- (old) .............. ~..383. Superfine 475. 483. - Harrow (new) ......... Mei, -White (1836) 4`.25. 445. Fine 46s. 483. Brank . .... %.,' ,356. -- Superfine 50s. 545. Cats; Feed ....................... ....10":...... -Foreign free Rye 30s. 345. ki,--- Poland ..................... ....74:5, Barley 0 6s 28s New ............. _.:.20, ... . .. •2 4 _s. Grinding 295. 30s. - Malting ' l 4;.3°s. Malt 465. 525, - Potatoe .................... New ............ - Scotch ....... ............. . - Fine New 54g. 60s. Pease, Grey, New 325. 345. - Maple New . 355. 365. -- White 12s. 345. - Boiler. 36s. 38s - Irish ...... i 4c 48 1 . Flour Town per f: ack) ....... ~,.4 0 ., Sleconds .................. • - North Country ....... 7-94, Bran --.-..' .IJul ICI • ..XM .05 I .0.11 - I Q _W ARRIVALS OF GRAIN IN LONDON DURING LAST ° f ~, T VI P. From Whence. eT: o 11 '..." F - r z n . • s ---.": ---- ___ ____. ____ ____, _ - -----c ag y ' Qrs. Qr,. Qrs. QrY. Qrs. Qrs. f2fB. .... Arundel : 200 -- Boston - ••• Bridlington — 200 -- --• Bridport — 100 10 Clay — 30 30 , -- „ 9 70 )_ , - Colchester.- 550 797 50 49 1. 5 525 N . Harwich 986 531 -.— 231 ' A ..- ; Leigh " Maldwn 1702 14 li 0 103 .''' 'w Exeter — 113 :::;„. Gainsborough — 40 --. __ L W Hall. — 670 Ipswich • (6l 885 2 ' 3 61 0 Kent Lowestoft — 30 10 --- --" . Lyme — 25 --•— •••• Lynn — 83(1 -- ."-. ... .. A Newcastle — 60 --•-- ‘2. I Y Newhaven Penzance - Paula — 150 12 -- 9 , r Rye 1 (0 _ 23 -.. Southwold - "'" Stockton — 50 gli Well Wisbeach Wosdbridge - 7Q O Yarmouth l7O 10 986 30 Aberdeen — 690 --- -- A Banff — 110 -- -- 11 ' Berwick . Pumice — 39 '-' Leith — 37 —.— --• Montrose ... - .../". .--- -- ___ -------; 085 7649 272 5148 5237 20 593 10 1 . 1 RISH. ..- Ballina •-• Cork 43 924 --• toalway -- ..... 1425 -- ..... Limerick ... - -•''l Waterford — 16 6:6 -- ..• ' Westport — 750 -- --- Youghall.... - FOREIGN. Alton a - I --. I g°: Guernsey r;otterdam — 85 - -- Coastways... — 400 -- ..../.._,, ------ 52 ,) Total AGGREGATE QUANTITIES OF OTHER KINDS OF Puol 140 5 Taus, 25—Linseed,12 lorr.lapeseed o—Brank, i....Mustard,47l-Se SMITHFIELD M The supply to this day's market dull, at the following .. PRICES PER STONE OF SLB. TO SINK TUE OFFAL% m ir 2 ii. S. d. to s. d. S d w glC° Inferior Beasts . 2 '2 6 Inferior Sheep 6 3 . Second quality ditto 2 S 3 2 S econ d qua l ity di tt0... ... 3 0 4 % s 0 Prime large Oxen 3 6 310 Coarso.w,solled ditto..... 3 4 Prime Scots, &c. 4 4 4 0 Large coarse Calves 910 4 2 L arge H ogs Prime small ditto 4 4 48 , Small Porkers S.lclaing Calves each ...16 t, 35 01 Quarter old Pigs each, 12 u Lamb 4s Od. to ss. 2d. I, i .RKET, was mo, —SEPT. J. lerate, an the trade SUPPLY, AS PER CLERK'S STATEMENT. ig , • B2,4oasts. I Sheep. I Calves. I r 3 51 irr 35 20,140 260 About 1 50 of the Beasts came up the St. Alban's road ; abe ta ? l e stle the other northern ro et ds ; a bout 200 (i nc l u di ng I r i s h) f ro m the; cal': a 1 .4 midland districts; about 150 from Noffolk, Suffbut, Essex, '4.n, 0 0 4 brid4eshire ; about 20 from Kent and Sussex ; and most of the :QM' , from the marshes, &.c. in the neighbourhood of London. ___.----- NENVGATE AND LEA At per stone, s d.tos d s 6. 0 ;10 2 3 4 4 310 4 3 10 o , 4 6 Beef, inferior 2 4 2 - middling 2 10 -- prime large 3 4 3 - prime serial .•. 000000 3 6 3 Veal Limb DENHALL MAR KT:;TS. ly the Carcass. 8 Mutton, inferior 2 middling prime S Pork, large 6 -small 3i. Rd. to 4s. titt. ISLINGTON CATTLE lIIARKET.—SErr. 5. ..,• jOr This day's supply consisted of 195 Beasts, 2762 Sheep and .4 ;4 and 6 Calve s . Th e trade was dull throu g h ou t a t the f 011 prices per stone of 81b. sinking the offals : 811 Beef 3s. 4d. to 4s. 4d. Veal Is. l od •to4s 0 Mutton 3 8 4 8 Pore 0 0 o. I 1 amb RICE OF BREA. The highest Price of Bre P ad in the Metropolis is &l. For the 4 1 b• I#4 Good Bread may be had at 6d. PRICE OF S. Per Cwt. New English Red Clover4Bs. Vs. 70s Old Ditto Ditto s —s. —3 New Foreign Ditto 4ss. 565. 635. Old Ditto Ditto s —s. —s. New White Clover s6s. 70g. 80s. Old Ditto Ditto New Trefoil l6s. 18s. 21s. Old Ditto —s. his. Pls. Tref()num 19s 20s 23s English Carraway —s. 435. 475. Foreign Ditto —s. 5 ,, 5. 594. Coriander —s. Ss. 10s. Rapeseed, English tine (per Las EEDS.—Sept. 5. Per Quarter. ~ ' 410 St. Foin 'l4s. 0 " OP Rye Grass 205. O a ' es. —s. 3 9 ' asu Pacey Grass .n., 4s. ,1. , Linseed, for feeding , ,...... . 5, ..,,, Ditto, for sowing. --,. Atii , (JP' Ditto, for crushing --, "` 4 10 ' ..... 5 . 4S• A ss. Canary __,s. 44 ,4, Hemp Per Bushel ,„,,:0 ( 1_, White Mustard 103. of2. :',', 0 6 ' Brown Ditto P2s. i'd• 1 0. 10 ' Tares 4s. 6J. , e q ........ , , ,, , t) 321 35/. Foreign 311. .'"-- . . PRICES —Sept. 5. Farnham Pockets (per cwt.) OF HOPS 101. Os. 0/ Os. to I'd. OS. iy.. K.nno Pockets O/ Os. ~./. ss. to •S t 10 Cl. Os. 41. M. to 4 Choice ditto s • e,. I Kent Bags... 3!. 10s. 5!. Os. to d'•• gi. Sussex Pockets 5!• 01. Os. 31. Os. to es. Superfine ditto Old Duty estimated at 210,00C1. _-- PRICES OF POTATOES AT SPITALFIELI iS af t. Ware 9s 3d. to Ss 6d . Pe r Middling ls. 9d. to 2s. Od Chats ls. Od. to Is. 6d WHITECHAPEL HAY MARKET.—Sept. 3 j os Hay Straw 30s ud to 345. lid. PRICE OF OIL. 41 Oil , ''- 1 6 Rape Oil, brown, per ton, si)l. Os —Refined, 51/. 10s.—Lin. s eed 5i Linseed Oil Cake at the Mill, (1000 ,111. Os —Rape Cake , pert" d. PRICES OF LEATHER . f 4 O il Per lb d. to d. 1 Per lb 14 0 Crop Hides, 30 to 401 b each 12 131 Horse Hides, Geri flan ..... j 1 94 - -40 50 121 15 ------ Spat i , ,sh .... ;11,0 gli ----50 60 l4 17 C a lfSki ns,3o tole' o. (do 'or 24 Bull Hides - 40 50. ........... •2 0 0 Butts, Vitriol -..._ 50 op ......... ...,,,14 )0 - English l5 23 I- 70 11W 4 ........... il 1 1 - Foreign Foreign Hides ..... ... 10 12 .$ Dressing Hides - Shaved .... 15 19 Basils ,. .............. ts _.g Best Saddlers Hid Horse Hides, English . ...... 13 16 Shoulders .. ..... •• ~..• • If rounded 2d. to 4d per lb mo re _ PRICE O.l' FALLOW, Town Tallow 47s. 6d. Yellow Russia White —s. Od. Soap Ditto —s. Od. Melting Stuff 3Bs. Od. Ditto Rough 2ss. Od. _. 0 1 . , , SOAP, &C. r er 1 121 b• Yellow Soap . .... --• 0 , " Mottled .« ......................... ,„ .-- ;:tr„ 1 : Curd . ............... .. l 4,, 0, .......... Graves Good Dregs ...... - . ................. •-•''' _..-- - - • C. PRICE OF RAW FAT, per stcr ne of egb. ... '72% 4 Price of Tallow (as stat e d by th e T a ll ow M e lt er s ) ....... .. PRICE CANDLER O The price of good Store Candles OF in the Retaii Shops is as lb -IW to', ...0 Candles, per dozen, is. Od. ; inferior, Gs. Ad.—Moulds, 64 ' Sixpence per dozen discount re cash. .. e) ott x ; PLATED CORNER DIS I `os o 7 with Strong Silver Edges and Handles.--A Set of F" ., '510 60 .'.. Corner Dishes and Covers are offered, complete, for NMI en Gad or a set with richly ornamented Edges, Handles, Sic., fc , r pis neas. The Handles take off the Covers, so as to form OW I 3 I I , S i when required. T. COX SAVORY'S, Working G olds' versmith, ad Wathmaker, 47, Crnhill, Lndon. fto N.B. A n variety c of Secondhand Watches o may be 3 ,electe d all price Two Guineas each. Warranted. 1 1‘ BIRTHS. 3011, lit' On the 29th inst., the lady of John Bowen, Esq., 13f a Co born, h Ro l ' On the Ist inst., at Wool w i c h-common, the lady o f the Molyneux, of a daughter. DP On the 26th ult., Mrs. S. H. Day, of a daughter. , o f 'I I ' On the 3d inst., at Lansdowne-crescent, Bath, the 184 8. Dl ' Shute, Esq., of a son. MrS• On the 3d inst., at Waldershare Park, the Ho n• Garnier, of a son. -- " t er MARRIED. ,i, n 0 r P o lief On the Ist inst., at Christow, in Devonshire,,_ A "'.„ -n3 d 13 it be Esq., eldest son of the Rev. Richard Lane, of Cofficet7.7 h ter e' House, Devonshire, to the Hon. Julia Pellew. only dsL° .41 r late and sister of the present Viscount Exmouth. g On the 3d inst., at St. George's, Hanover-s qua , •e , e h rY da te' stig h Cundy, Esq., of Wilton-road, to Jane Shakspeare, see ° of George Downing, Esq., of King's-road, Pimlico ). Ra e On the 3d inst., at St. Paul's, Deptford, Mr. J 011r ' of Miss Robinson, both of Deptford. i, Esq., of On the Ist inst., Henry 13elward, eldest son of ft' - l iugh ter Grove House, Edmonton, to Louisa Harriet, you agest _,. the Rev. J. Haggitt, Rector of Ditton, near Cam bridge On the 4th inst., at Lewes aged 0, :A0 of fr ... Windus, Esq., of the War-ofice r elic t On the Ist inst., at A er h . . aged 75, id 9 Eelea, m s am, J. Eeles, Esq. fad' f On the 4th inst, at Denm V.; am 1 ark-terrace, „dam b °f wife of J. Maclean Es on Mrs. Wi .Idus, o i,--yr , i ..3 a nt s° ¢ On the 4th inst., in Park-crescent, . Ft/Miriam, 0 the juA s944 the Baron de Lagos. On the 2d inst aged 0 Robert, 1 ' ~ b -1, e Gest son of iP ' l'. NVar g , of Chehfield, Kent. -orillis' On the Ist inst Long Ashton,H ' t '. ~ at arrtot , w i fe o f MT, f 0' kenri Brai dge, of Bartlett'sAauildings, London . w ile 1,11, On the sth ult., aged 25, Sarah Elizabeth Gertrud . li _, r 4 Lloyd, Esq of •Cardigan, only daughter of Benjamin dwri;e, la d Cat mo Esq., of Paddington, Middlesex, and Cilgwyn, •digans' 1 • al o' grand-daughter of the late Richard Braithwaite, Esq. , el the White, of G r e e21 if'f ..:, __ . _ .....r.............. „.„„.. ,,,, ......! - r lO. , _ __________ riqG. o f t oll • omlon: Printed and Published by MMIDO YO , the a , 112, Strand, at Vie Sun Office, No. 112, StraSsloj n of Middlesex. i