The Sun. — London, England, 1810-02-27 00:00:00

'7 F. t f -F } m oan; hart with 'those Cifficers; at the`_ conclusion of which !id Lortidlip ariswi , !realti a genaal question thus : I old not :.enceive that either thenaval or military sztearis of the cotni:ry is.crorx.poscd i, tiie Expeditiatl, .to iuimi tiler•t z a rit."T • . .• • - • Did your Lordship understand that the possession Of *lecf-fit g tors •ece--sary to the, ulterior objects of the Expedition ?-1 did.• - A', , for such. detachments:as , were in con templa, ion orifynafly to have been made for the or- Cupation of Walc' eren and- South Bevelard, t was the ainoulli :orct-! with \ti;ic,ll vout: Lordship hoped 'that, Oder favourable circuinstinces; in four dap., you iniOtt have arilved at Saint -het wish first to state,-11411 enterona:d.very great hopes it would not have beep:lei essary to kive'Lfi 12:060. -men,- or near se Large_ a force as that - at Walcheren ; but stipposino hot to 11:tve been left, probably about inure would hat e been sufficient to have 1 2 .ftitt South 13,-veland, which would. Fob:,hly have vi 'about of 3 and 20,000 for toe ulterior cp.ration... According to vont Lordship's most satti?u - ine.eX-_, pettatious.,' on what day of August did you think it. .probible, --that under Che 9nist favourable .eireum stnices - those two. or three. and twenty thousand itEyight pace- been disembarked- at•Satirt het diy not feel »yselt competeut to -retk to the time of they ; I i!art.state how long I think-possibly they might .be disembarking ; but it .is rather,a na val, question than one 1 conceive tuyself 'able speak•to, as to the time they would have taken in • arcing. • - • Previobsly to.tyour Lordship's* sailing,: had yon concerted arty plan of operations with Sir Richard Strachan ?—We • had -rept ated cottversation 'upon: ',the subjea, and I thought.perfei;tly understood-e.ich • other as to - the mode of prosecuting the.entrrptize. Can your Lordship stue the number of fortified 'towns within thirty, tittles of Antwerp ?-4 really cannot. Can your Lordship state, the numberof fortified' towns within sixty miles of Antwerp ?-I\ro, 1 can not.- • BIS NARRATIVE.. I d s the date marked upon the .intelligence- present ed by your Lordship,:inz. the 15th of October, cor n:6ly rnarkedl-4-It is.' - • Vv as the- time ..of its leirig drawn u p ?—f t wasin a great•measure drawn up at that time, ai:d therefore it. bears thot darei I did not - think it' pio per to ciehser u at ,that time, it Wins not deliveied course till tht.l , ttli February ; I had reasons f,r not .cleilvet ing it, but I th6ug,lit it better ,to preserve the ;Efate at which it mas in. fact 'drawn up ; there were after that time none.but vt-rhal . or critical al teration.* ; 1 considered the report as finished on that day. • • Is this the only narrative or memorial, or paper of` ptty.drticription; which has- b( en delivered to .his Brliiesty:by-your Lordship on te subject of the ex pedittot:y—rl have stated !kt tl.is v'per was prepar ed as my . repots of me proceeding, in the Scheldt, and that it was delivered to his'l\laj , , such "on the 14th of Ft , hruary; tiaat is all I can State on the subject' of this paper which is before:the House. Wqstht...re any oth'et or Memorandum of any sort, dedvereu to his jesty upon thiq stinkftt by )ADur'l,o!dst,ip L.. J bt - rve• already siat--'d • that this p:tpt.r.wis piepired -nu the -15th of October very 'ready : to state,-: if it is - wished, the rt ason 1 did -.1:ot . deliver: tbep ; reason 1 did not- driiver if was,:thfit I did iiut s think it . was right for rue. to state, iti tact; whit would cons . itute. tuy defence in case.of an intjuiry, - ' whether civil or militari , ,:that w.is the reason I did not delive+ it , Ltlid..4leliver ii •as my rt.pott of ivy prouteain.gs, on the. 14th . -of. February ; that is all the e%,:lvation I can trive op the .sohjeet Li.the id per that is before the House ; • • - • / Was any other paper, narrative, memorial, or me . morindum of any sortdelivczed-set his 111t , jesty utron this subject . your Lordihip.?—This paper, which • is no. , Litiore the House, _is -my tttlici Itepoft,of , .oceedings ; when altlied with respeoi..,to any o her paper, or to any other emit tanstances -. 1:0t • coming under that description, S (.1:, not feel myself at• liberty to enter at all into any examination ot:titat sort,., and I must beg to - decline giving any answer to the question put to [rte. ? .. • •:' Was' th.. I\arri-ttiN,e. , n6w before the 'House sub..- mitted'to any of - his 11.1'ij.esys Ministers -either otfi-. ei•lly or othcrsvie, presloii.sly to its being deliVered to his Nl.-j(-st,y ?—Not inet: ioitsb was submitted to i .the Cabinet the day that it was 'delivered to the' King. • • • .before or after its delivery - ?—:Aftcr. • . Was any Conitnetticalion- made by your Lordship to any of his Majesty's ..Ministers of your intentioy to..deliver such a narratiye to the King, previously io its.being delivered was de.ivercd after the Le vee; .1 think 1 stated to several of his Majesty's 'fluter's that I meant to deliver. it.that day, - :Did your Lot riship- aeriu,!int several of his Majes- . . -Ministers at the Levee, :of 'your intention• to • ' deliver it previously td,its being delivered ?f--I.think - I stats:d it ruereiy in convers4lioti, to deliver It myself to -the Kung, having received mr_in6true lions under the Sigit -Manual,. I thought it' proper to . present my, report untne..tiatrly to t-ife King, wh;cll was afterwards laid btifore the Cabinet. Will your tordsl.ip have the goodness to State hich of his - Majesty's Alitusters'M ere pfesent at t h e LtWet', fid to: willed of ti:em your Lordship the cf: ?—I realiy 'cannot ; I - b.t-heve. most of the Ministers- were there I ;did not state it - to tltein in any official t;-ay, there,- , tore it c appear.ed very immatt.)rial whether I stated it or . _ • •I D.:es, your . Lordship recolle6,l that the cor.eluditig i p tragraph , in• the insdritatonsi 'trader the Sign Ma-. • :mat' runs thus During Jour 1./4 - dship's continu-' crt this Nemec; you are to.,seml-or•:Hint: to be sent.. to us,, through one of our principaf.-Sed'earies' of-State, constant accounts of , a II ,t i parses ; and you are to folloW ail such ordt.ls and Oirettionias we send you, . either under ourfStgit Alaimo!, or • through one ill our princi e al B , icretaries of State ?" --Certainly ; and I acted always iu stria couforruity • thereto. • • •, ;Can your Lordship state- any reasons for having deviated from - the usual cot,rs , . , , under The ust3~i in structiops .(as I suppose these, to bt) - of delis eri your nairative of; such service. through one of toe -principal Secretaries of State --- - 4B.itig on the sc,or, thought - it more prupgr, in the situation in which I-stood, to make t 1 mYself to Majesty r it would have been - open to. me, unaer that instine- Oop, to have made it tiiroitOi the Secretary of State, ,ut I telt,it , inore proper to do it as I did, and that it ,hophigo to the Seeretary.of St& afterwards, Did . your LOrdship male any wt it ten comMunica tion by way of narr..thre, or otherwke, of what had passed inter your Loldship's command in the E4pedition to the Schildt to his Majesty's Prin cipal Secretary of State on yourreturn did not, I thought my, dispatches were sufficient. Was 'any narrative or t required by :anyof his Majesty's Ministers of yOu'r Lordship,ttfier youf return, ?--- - --No f none.. - .; Was your Lotdsbip asked officiAly. by ; his--Ma jesty'sAliniSters; alter your ri-turn,' for- any account 'of your pric.Teedings beyond whin had -beet> Convey ed in the dispatches ,of the expedition under . Lord shifs:comthand was - itht. , Does your Lordship recollrct the circumsthnce of !•an Address presented by - the City of. Loudon to his Majesty On the SUbject 'of the Expedition to the Sheldt ? do-perfectly ; 'and I believe the letter I wrote ih consequence is before this House. • Was your Lordship consulted by any of his Ma.: j:sty's Ministers, preViously fn the answer gi‘en . by his Majesty to_ Address, upon the" -satisfaction he. had telt \Villa 'both the serVices Upon the Expe (linen 'to 41:e Scheldt should bave'no difficulty. in answering 'that gnostic:la. I, baVe sowedoubts One as to.its propri , ..tty, as that question cannot he asked of me as - a miliiary man. I had ceased to be in the cOnnnand '; I was never asked officially any qneslion•opon it. Ibelievethatby'my tt.r,whit isnpen the table here, it seen that I was no party at:all ; that I was , not present at any discussion whatever les; caing the answer to that Addr i ss. When did your Lordship cpprehend yot r. com mand to cease, and ti.at you were not consulted as a General Officer was" hardly consulted as -a . General Otlicer after my return. I , ceased tot be in command of the EXpeditiou in Zealand on the - ^2.3th . of Slatemb , :r. Was - your - Lordship Consulted ip youir c - pacity .011 ' the, pioprit ty of retaining the I , lan.l Walclleren after )(ant - Lordshi . o's ;coral'? t! , ink not'; not officially I.was sum cetine6ed with it, but 1 du 'think I - was any•distin6t opinion, upon it. • Yottr Lo'Cdship - bas• stated that your reasons for . not 'delivering 'your Narrative to the King earlier than the 14th of February, Were, 'that you choseio reserve your del-ncetiil the Inane when anymilltary or ,inquiry might take plaCe ; will ioui Lord- ; ship state your reason for delivering it on' - the ote cise day of the 14th of February ?—I had no of:O -cular reason for doh - o) - it on that precise da‘ , except that it happened to be a Levee day; why I wished to do it about that nine was; that 4 conceived there was no objection at that Inn& to my ,s 0 doing, 'and besides that I felt a desire that' as I had not been . called upon at that rime to be'. examined here, and that the Admiral had, my account of the proceed jogs in the SClteldt .might, 'in' some way or other, come beforelhe r knew that could not be done but . by delivering it to -the King. • I here think it necesSary to slate in addl.' ion; that one of the reasons w- , y I wished for a ceitain t tine to deiay delivering thiSrepat was ? tilat I uas in expeEiation that some acconot of hi, orricceiliogs.'"Would have been delic,..ted- in -by Sir ; Richard .Sfrachan ; I bad indeed neat-stood that he had tte-o,caled upon fiie something of that sort ; know that with a view it he bad - asked for pa:nu:Lir' reports and details Of seveml'Of the Officers under him. I c - onceived lie would" be called upon to make some narrative of. his proceedigs. and I was.very anxious that theYshdukl both - Conte -up precisely •:it - the same time, that I should not state my narrative first before any state meta was given in by him. From whbm did your Lordship understand that Rt . Riehard . •Strachau had been - called upon for a 'tar-, rative of his proceedings did hot know it from any gobd authority, for probably the tiling:would' ha're taken place if I had. , I allude to that which was very gLnerAly understood. 1 i• - new that all the Officers under Sir Richkd Strachan had teen called m.onfor minute repoits of their proceedings. I suppose I was mistaken, or -probably a report would have appeared;-ii it was called . for from him-; but nudersiumbit from rumour; and I thought-irprOba ble. Was it merely from common rumour, and not froiniiiy official person you hod` chi's report ? I (1-- , not think it was. from any 6tficial.yersou.-: Or any one who had been an official person ?—I think not. Or conneCte4 viitli•any offickil person ?—No, think nut. ybur Lordship believe 'at the time you: de livered in• that narrative - to .the King, that Sir Ri chard Strachatt had clAivered in a narrative . of aty 'suit'?--I did not, I supposed certainly ixit. • ..After the delivery of that natrative, did your Lordship .take'any steps to COED ' L111:111iCa'e it to Sir Richard ,Strachan - ?—MoSt certainly not, nor should I have felt myself (if I had been inclined to it) ever') justified:in it.. - I do netfiee vu wh=it possible around I could have c:l.rumunicated ai official . report made to the King, I' believe it was moved for. the very day aft, r it was doiivered to the King'; thorefory Sir. Richard would kiave it in that way. , Did your• Lordship know that there were under your COM wa nd Officeis who had be at Antwerp in the eourstl'of . .tcr*ice?—Yes, I did. ' Did. your I.oidship consult with' these Officers individually or colleLtively on the: subject of the Expedition.?--I „had conversation 'with them :or coiHulted with them on, the sUbjeet of`: the I....Ape there were, I believe, one or two Officers who liad been' these. Will your LOrdsiio have the goodnes to name" Who those:OH - leers ere"—Sir -had been there,' saw him at aeql, and had sotrie Aviih him cal the 'sphjea of the enter prize .; and - I believe Ge•,,ieral."CrOs%'enor had - beep there, he ha..l been, I koow,•00 the fete cie'Sba dra, 81:d I rather thilik he 'vas in Antwerp. Did you Lold,hip, ask, or., receive any opinion from to r e Gem-rat Officers under your command, on the prol;a';,ili.) , o rnprolobtlily l of, the snccess'oi the - euttris--... —it is ycry ti answer..t hail ques tion ; ii..ineaot Jo ask whether I...called upon R y General to give - : me a . report., of hi, opiuion on the pramlitli . ty-or improbabliny of tlin enterprise, .1, certainly did Rot.. 'Thad a gnat deal .. • ofconverSation with- dilicitrit Of&ers, but; their opinions must necessarily. vary from time to time, according to iutelligence and othercircunistinces; . DoeS your Lordship recoilea a particular con . - versation with Sir John Hope,.a: Deal-Or -Ramsgate, on the subjea of the ,prikability 'success - or failure I.had a gOOd deal of conversation, ;with Sir. John Hope at Deal, on the general-opera tions to be purgued ; but I do "not think that Sir .John Hope stated to me any distinct opinion one way or.the other as to the probable success ot faalure .of the enterpr:ze. Did your Lordship deliver . 46 his Majesty • any narrative, memorial . , .paper, or memorandum, rela •tivoto the Expedition to the Scht'ldt, besides the e one wimich is now !von the table of the House .of,.' Commons ?—I have said that I delivered on the 14th of - February, to his Majesty, my oflidal Re port of my proeeelings in -the. Scheldt, and . 1 roust be under the nee, ssity of persC3ting in my d , termi nation of dechicing to answer any futilier questiOn upon that subject. As Commander in Chief of the Expedition to the Scheldt,'did•your Lordship deliver to his Majesty any other- paper, narrative, or • memorandum, .r,.- speeting the operations of that EZpeditton, , besides ,the Narrative' trOw on- the table ot the House. of Commons ?-4 - can give .rib other . answer. f have already ; I have stated 111;it 1 de.fivred my Report, as Commander. of the Expedition,: to toe -King on the hof February. - 'UpOn what grounds dot's Lord'ship' tetuse to • answer th'e question just proposed decjinp answering the I have-stated • all I al. 41 - nlYmili'"'Y'.c 3 P 3(2 )" , which is, that '1 delivered my i ofticial7'report is the King on'tne 14th of Febrnary•; 96- the contents of that report I am fctady tozive atty . information: D. es your Lordship iehise to atisVi?er the giiestion Jgist proAied on the ground of -par. being a. Privy refuse •it generaliy. I dcciim Ott- i t lie guest. ion. Did not the capture or dcstru6ion of erkmy's form one of Ili!! Most material ebjeas of the ,641-edition, to the Seheldt ?—lt ce:rtaMly, degeribA in ti:e in.struttions. Did your Loidship know, prior to your sailing. frow England, that the French fleet` coold put their uncie . r tie proreaion of thq ha.tcti,es •at Ai,twerp ? hail.no very precise information communicated to Inc upon that subjedi ; it was rather A naval . quest In.the event that your Lordship kbotild find, on your arrival, the fieet had-so put itselfin - protection' under the. cit add' Of "Antwerp, and.that TA:lr Lord ship - find the •oita:.tel a - nd the town or Ant wefp it, a •Stale - of defence, had Lor&hip -10 thi4 country fOrmc:d any determination as to what, were to be your Eurdship's operations under those eireiunstances have before said, That no ire ciqe.plan of operations vas fixer iipcip before I left this colt try -; and it 'must have dekncled en tit ely upon: circumstances, and the intelligOnc6 when we arriVa. „ • In the'event of your Lordship's finding t'he enerny in pcissession of tib . artily te,ldY to take the, field agaitist your Lord-,liip'S • army, but in a s' re crt tit:- fence in, Aor,Verp; 113 c- your tordAip:fi,rtned deter ininaCon . as •to your uperat . u‘n, 'Wh'ether, jou would, in 'order to destr6y the fleet; as one of the great abje4..ts,-besiege A:nt,Aerp ?H-I had lot rnd nO detertn'nation below I went ; as I said, that must depenl 'upon ciTutitaistances - at the . time. !Then your Lordship li~ti . formed no plan of opeeations prior to your .4 14 friarn" 'this cArtury ? —No detailed' plan of - opet Prior to your Lordship's sailing frond Et , gland, had your Lordship any.inteiligetice as to the state of ArtwerP, and the strength of the enemy in Aut werp and its tieighbOurhood ?- 7 -4 . had no More pre cise information upon that suhjea than what. IS .eoptained in the intelligence that is before the House. , Did your Lordship .find that intelligence correa do not knew bait' to answer that question cr - c.- aaly i . ,or how I could - ever ascertain whether it was correa ; is it meant to he asked whether it was cor red at the timeit Whether the state in which" your Lordship foilind the enemy *and. his fortresses ., on yo'ir arrival in the Scheldt, corresponded with that represented to, your Lordship to be - the state of the enemy prior IQ your Lordship leaving this country did not, find on my Arrival any inforwatioti on this sobjeaf;',l ac quired information gradually of the strength of Ant werp and the enemy's ibt Did such information as your Lordship gradually acquired .after 'your arrival there, correspond 'with the' infortmiti`on previously, received here ?—I think not entirely As ',to Ihe state of Antwerp. Did it materially differ as to the state of AntWerp? believe that. the intelligence so far as it went, not - imniediately on 'thy arrival but at a subsequent time, went to state that the Works- of Antwerp had been put into a'state of repair. Does, your Lordship believe that the works of An twerp,.. : particulailY the citadel of Antwerp; were not put into a sate of repair until after the arrival of your Lordship in - ,,the Scheldt ?-4 ;should fancy Velure that'tinio,, but I cannot speak cerreClly. • Did your - Lordship ekped when you sailed to4nd Antwerp in a bad state of defence, hoth as to its fortifications and its .garrison great deal of the intelligence certainly went to that effect. :Was your Lordship furnistied; prior to your sail ing from this countly,. with heavy ordnance, in, the event, of its being necessary to undertake the siege of Antwerp; 'had . you any drdnance' Sufficient to undertake that .sii.ge!independent of theordnance for the siege of .Fiushing, sufficient to enable your Lord ship to carry on two at• once it nec,2,7saly ?—I am afraid I cannot perit;olly answer that without kno*.ing what circumstances'are suppo'sed by the question, - , Aineiher under the ,cirOurnsimees rat Antwerp being in a perfe4.l,state. of ct4cuec , , With it sofficient aihd ample garrison, or • under aV other supposition: . • ' Under the supposition either of AfitYvel;P' being sufficiently garrisoned, and in a sufficieht state of defence, and (hit it wotiLi be necessary to i:ndert:il.e a regirl,T , riege, was your Lordship furnished' heavy niottars sufficient to bonihaid the 'town, in the ivetit of a bombstrduient being reSortel to. Ti at ii,a professional ques ion which I do riot-Li,f,v ~3• VIZ 1 CF. 0 y ~ .r- howl() ansiver, tmlec•s''it not Perfealy tali," the que'stioti.; your. I,or , qlbip . funiiBll:7d kvitti ct.itt.- , of livavy artillery to enable yolito . carry tm operations,' (be one igainst Ant , .v , rp.and the , tlE'•': again,s 4 t - Flushing, at qe §lme ti% .e cicncy of heavy artille.ry, pro i , ort;')q I.i strength of the army: I. c'ert.ain:y h d not - 1 eieney of artillery (nor Ni.as it in conte'-adi ~01.) wa the siege of thelown and of " 11 1 )- posing it I.) be in - repair and such a siege could never have been With the army I Otnimatided. I wish to there was a soffit:jell:y . of ordnance t-a ,, e bombardinent; 'but in the event of a •i"ge . ' heavy OiCill'ante fur the Exre.litio t agl'ingt was tfz be furnished by the Navy.---fit 4 Was directed to with. raw. • _ F :atcd SHIP YEWS; , . . .1 O'RAV &SAND, rgartuArty 23. . .. , . . Arrived-..the PUZZIO, Wolenburgii, trom. St. Miebaersl !oho, Field, .1331:013 float St. l'hortus's ; and the C0t ,, ;.. 1 ' 3, 0t , .0y, fiom Cadiz . , . . Sailed—tbe Patriot, NiaTtiit, for Cadiz ; and ...11', ,, Mcrll'79 • Wee es, for Jamaica: „ .." - ' . • w•i FEB. 25, Arrived - the. bispatch, .Farnigrr, tio.it Leo ~. "; Hare, Lord, an., Eliza, • Pzliiier, Lou (.;11,r..:;ir ; •"' d '` "l-- • . Margaret, Meots, frotwßengal„ - , . 1 13 - ' . Sailed — th e I'. o Ifrothers, Fatto,. for l'e...tcrid' , .. s' • 11.allahan, -and Dtirothea,,—,, for Gibral'ar; Alfi" 3 ' I : 1 ' , C.. ion,. for Lisbon ; Nerptrte, ~t l;, itit l, 'antl Thrt.e .oroti,ter.,, ~., labkenburgii, fur "I W.:11,5' s.• ' . __... • . s-• • . idIkTHS. . • -,. •.- . • • On Wednesday the zist init.• the Lady of-13a - rthola rcy'r ieff O erY,Tit to - IQ/son- st rect.• . n the 23d inst. at ga Wood: n t. neari.Chi;ch,:ster, tt,. f..idy• .of Captain Sir John G,.ie, R. N. 'WA Li.auglita, \'' ''' the ''' the mother, is doing well. - •. , ', • . . . 1 ,11.141 - • T h.: same thy, in c L ul.lforsl-street, M , rs. Ge , ,rge. ~).. . of a Son. . .: ~.. Of% I , riday 1.: . : ,,. . 'the. I;ady..Qf : - Ihr. , slis liuttuil, t•- U ,- ~. ' s.f efard's:cross , , .I!ucks, of :, DAa A iif cr. - - ........ • —....------:---=-"-- . L.qb/). .• - • On the zpth inst. at Tortpay, the- 1.,.4v of t. 1 3 e-tw s ?' worth "Frevifnian, Lsy. of Cairnays, thy ~ .., . :.lvty•at wall. On .Saturday r. 16seph tier. in t tie Auji - ttUf het., sornerset- acea 27 The 4anie day, at York-ii,,w,e, is4cii, .) uY in the 17th year of her aike, C , ns Francis Constable, Esq.- or liuttun fic,ier ne.ss.„ Yorkshire. . PRiCE , 0.1%.i'104AS , . YESTErt 6 / 1 .1t: ' __ 'tank Stock, 276 ' India Stock, Nivy ; pei (ein. 99 ii i I Ineila Bonds, 125. pr. Irish 5 p•'•. - :r Cent. F.: , :c11'...q 1 , ,t;,, 3. rios. pr. 4 per ~....orit. 84 153 i - .-' , link - Jerk,' 3 p‘,.-4...e.:c. , ; pet Ceat. ~ ....7: 0k ai : . Ditto Ann: - • • ' 1 ;1, 3 per ~.I.:ent.. Con. 67 ir -6 I . Con. for 2701 i'! , st. 67i g z_. Bank L. Ann. IS 7- i6iiish LOODON 'S. 4 IARK ETS, Red Clover White ditto Trsetoil - - Rye-Grass s - - Red Green White Nittstidd Seed Brown ditto • - Caraway seeds - Coriander do. • • PRICE St.larnes's Market 4s. 6S. Clare Market os. Whltechap:Market 4s. per stone (Slaw,. 85.,t00t. A.Nerage price 45.- Sa. . . . . 14)1 11) ON 1 , I' rirte6 Im RIC Eijkl-t1) I-IA 1(14.4 S, 01 Mt:, 4, Martiot.. ( ourt,l;sl".s . trcct ; .,nd y, ‘V 1 LI.I R V,. I 1.1. , 5, t South Nol tot' street. CrofsVea j 42 o - ( re• At-the fit; ts;-,Uii . rce, No. StraLd, wheie Advertisements, Orders fur the l'aper,, Letters for the Br.-c.(post-p2ia), trust t addreFr!4 • • KETIIIIN OF . WI - ILATs IN MAR.:(-1,1;1 1 / 4 7E, - Bybjescfs. C ate anti NI ALP A Si Meal Itictuding only fro:ii Feb'. t , :k Feb. r 7. agreeably t¢ tpe 4 6o Quarters at !to oct tjl o't 12.) at J . 14; Od, 1.13 — 7 -7 at. 9 tit ------ at 1t 3 04 t 075 0, 4 , le4 at los ‘d 539 icy 1 43 at loSa 'od 1.2 ;3 a. 9= oc. 9 b 5 219 46'7 2tta to:, cAI b.4i at loos od 3(6 -- at 'S7) od iO9 at 99a od' 769 —.,--- A „. And lot Quarters at 709.0 d. per ft„.nai td. "iota: 13559 , i,?grtera 974. is. a t i. Ingittl Return. A RETURN OF FLOUR, From Feb. to, to Yen. 16, froM tlii: Cot ket-Olf:c e • d. Sacks. s. el. • ,Sacks. s. Siasla- • t 51 39 9 0! o o . 3•3 3 6‘ -- 8 8 6 7- 1 9 ) • 4 0 4 -- 8 9 0 337 85• G '• 1 5 7 ‘ ti 4)1 01 7 g 4 o • • And S Saks at 735. per Sack., Stick . -Total-13,M —=av era ge 8 9 ,. 64tt- vier os. c:,(1. lower than last we ek. - SEEDS. . - • o d. to 161 s. do. os . . os o d. 'to Sri, • /56. OCi. _la 84i od. to quartet!. - tzs. te"2 od• - 255. .d. to 3-..5. od: to 1.2,5. od.biriqtci 16s. od: o d. do. - 425. 43d. to 475, cid: .. 16s. to t7S.. I. HUMS. SACS. POCKETS, ,of;•, , Kent, 41. to to 51, 125. Kent, 41. os. s) . Sussex, 4t, 95. to 41. tos. j Sussex, 3t. tss. to 4 1 , Es'ex, -4 1 - 03: to 5 1 . 12, Farnhatn,-61. ---s. to toi• .NEW.GATE AN!) LE ziDENHALL 11AgKr.TS• 4 4: : t t o o . l s s . . 2 o t d :. . I V ,o e r a t k i _ • By the Carcase. 1 ' t i. NBleuetfton— zd Best lieiters & S:eers, 2s . 8d to 3s oct Nlarket-Calt r4s Middlings is 4d to zs Eng,tiorse o d to --' ( 4 pe r A s \ t V .) 1 ( 11 0 1) nt i ;ISa‘ry. od to zs• Slnep Skins - 3s 6d , to 6s od ToWlfral lOW 755. RitS,Sia 7gi. , '/,lute do. 74,, ad. es. Soap .1.1:). 745. A Melting 1-t u lt 625. Os. tr 0,". Ditto rougi 4§. 2 es.,4 o "' Graves. 1/6. Cd- G0u...1 Dregs tzs. oa. Yellow Soar, 98s.—Mottled, 124. 1. ) rice cif Capc*s per doLen,,r3s. 143 HAY iVIALCKET, F. 26. Hay , 21 . 126. Gd. to 61. tzs 12S• ° Straw, 21. l't3. Od: to 31. 93.• —Aver 31. oi• V1111: 1 :Cli Al' 1. t, HAY. MA RK CI% 4 , fiay .s'. ss. cd. to 61. gios. `od. —A v'er: 51. I 7 5. • NCA.OI. os. cd. to 01. cd.— Aver. 01. os. od• Clover, 61. los. ad. va 71. i6s. o d.—Aver• 71.3 Strata, 21. od. w 21. 16s. 0d...---Aver. 1 24 - c'" : (21).t1... ;' , IARI:.E I S. • - Feb.' Ships :it M;ql4 , :i Siiios 501 . d.. Pricis. , -.;'6 ,1 19'. 6.., .N,..i,:astlc., . '33 at. .•;!,s 6(l' to S. - t. i Sui,duti..dia . 2. at, in: D , .1 to .5:• 3 • . , 2. S. 1),,,,i,t's at ..;:s 4c w , 4' '"; • z ,Cit.d,rs .• •s, or ,ils ..d. ' ''• [ ~, c ..ts ct• 89i Ne.c_kyuast,le . - • sa - of 4.0 0, I‘' ,-., “1 - 9 •Sull:i..ll.sol_ ,1ti,5ic,,t,...t.: i ' at .Ills 6d ' C i 1,1,1 6 2 . kr - 42S jd • . ' i. a 7:73 Neti,c., 1!. 42' at 4ts rat t° ' sis , to 474 'O6 40. 0.1 t - Cin,lc.is ~~ • NL I , v • oYes As, a I)egit, at O n . Illu n rda te iar : r ' , tinJ e , t G rant 11 1. tej'a4i o: • After kft e ,