The Sun. — London, England, 1810-08-18 00:00:00

ROME CIRCUIT. ESSEX ASSIZIES CHELMSFORD, AUG. i 6. MURDER.- James. SVeency, Riejiard.: Pearce, Edmunil Buck ley, Patrick Flerniar, Macrtce Brenw . ick, and John Sullivan; were indihed for t he ai fol murder of John Bolding, in the earis,b of West Ham, on the 20th day May Itit. . The Counsel for, the prosecution s rid; that the circuinstances which he ,lead to lay before the Jury were of a i.ature the most atrocionsand brutal that - 'had for a long space of lime .been the subject of in- quiry in - a -Court of Justice;, but before he entered "into a detail of the facts of the case, under the core . realms of his Lordship, he Would, presume to state what was the law, as applicable to those fads. The, evidence would net go - to chew that the deceased came by his death bysthe actual - hand . of any of the prisoners at the bar, but the Law., was, that if any ,•nutnber of men a , s"ociated fora . common purpose, and aeted in union, the aa of one u as the ad of the • whole of them: : Thos e if the JuFy ihotild be of opi nion that the prisoners at the bar abed in concert with 'he pers e n who actually killed the decease-I, they were as much guilty of the murder as thettgh they etch had struck the fatal blow., He than pro ceWed to d;.ta . l the trattsatnon as follows ea--The dr ceased was landli , rd of the Eagle and Child pub at Forest-gate. in the parish of West Ham ; and on the evening of Sunday, the 20th of May, a dispute took pl ice in the kitchen between a man of the name of Morissy,, an Irishman, and one Thomas, a carter. Thete Was. present another Irishman, of the name of Scai , dling; and an tact i's servant, of the Corti's!) Militia. There were challenges to.fight, 'and after some time . Morissy wanted to go away ; the deceased, suspecting he wanted. to fetch some of his companions, at first .could not let him go, but afterwards he went ; the landlord then ordered the door to be fastened. In about half an hour Morissy returned, but 'in the mean time the deceased had sent he carter away, Morissy knocked to be let in, but was . refused ; Scandling, however, Opened the door against the landlord's will, and Morissy came back .n .a great passion,, pulled off his cloaths, and -swore he would tight any body. In a short time . afterwards a large bury of Irish labotitera, above 30, came to the house, armed with bludgeons, petatoe hoes, 45,5 c. There could be no doubt, .he observed, but' when -Morisiy left the house he went for the purpose of getting this assistance; and there Was as lqtle.doubt but that Scandling *as privy to the pur -1 pas • tor which he went out. Bolding, the deceased, however, had shut up his ',ionic, and refused them altnittance, but Standing a second. time got ta the - door, and opened it, at the sssn e time exclaiming, " Now boys, go t ir !" They.aceordingly all rusaed into the house; 'the six prisoners among others, and in the tn , tutu ,Itueus manner demanded the carter, who h id given the supposid affront ; they searched the .4puse, but- nOt finding the object of their in tended, one of them, whom tie should -got be' abl: to identify, jumped pverthe bar, - where Bolding was sitting, and who had given them •no just cause . for offence, and immediately wititTa bludgeon at „tacked him. Hii skull was badly woended, his arms broken, his body much bruised, and after languish log about seen days, he died of his wounds.• • He :ehoeld prove thit the six prisoners were among the persons who dins rushed into the house, and, after • they had thus maltreated the deceased, Scandling demanded gin, which he served out to the others: It would also be•,tn evi.!enee, that Sweeney, one . of the ptisolieri, looking over the bar, observed, as the beatirg aas going on, "that the old fellow was catching it no-v ;" and atettle,r, whom the witeessi belies ed to be Buckley, though he was not certain, exclaimed, " the English --- were done at last," The learned Counsel having commented at Some length on •this v oient outrage, said, he. thought, if it were proved in evidence, he was • well warranted in saying, it was one of the most brutal transactions that had disgraced' modern times. Sarah Camber, the first - witness, deposed, that she lived housekeeper with Bolding. In May last, about half-past nine in the evening of Sunday, the. 20'h, there was a quarrel in the kitchen. - There were present in the house John Fanner, J. Bak'-r, Mrs. Thker, Mr. Simpson, Mary _M‘Leary the ser a ant, Wyo. Tippett and Geo. Gay, two soldiers, . quartted in the house; one Thomas, a carter; "Tho. Scandling, and,Cornelies Hay ; another I: ish man, of the name of Morissy, was also present. — In the dispute Scandling wanted to fight the carter, and Morissy offe4ed to fight any body. At that time an Otficer"s servant ceme in, and he accepted to tight Mm issy. She begged them to desist, as it • Was Sunday night. Marissy. then wanted to go , away, but the deceased atfirst would riot let hint depart. He, hOwever, went away, and •Bulding ordered the doers to be' . shet and fastened. • Soon afterwadsMorissy.teturned, but was refused ad . • tnittance. Soon after a person of the name of Memel •Mahony, not in custody, came, and Seand ling, against the dire&ions of the. deceased, openech the door-and let him in. When he came 'into the house, he- stormed and swore, and flourished a stick . over his head. . Shortly afterwards a gang of thirty of ale m came and demanded admittance, which be ing refused, they broke the windows and wiedew shutters, and Scandling again got to the dour and leathernin ; when they rushed itito the house, the carter and the office's' servant made their escape by the sack door. Mahony asked, what. was the affront ? Some one exclaimed, the English had in sol,ed set Irishman. Hs said " that is sufficient," acid they all inade a great-clamour, Just then some ~ne, w a w n she relit del to be Mahony, jumped two bar and knocked the deceased dawn, and continued beating him for some time. .The wetness cried out; the mail made a blew at her, and .3 wore he. would knock her down. She ,escaped into the parlour and hid herself 'Under the table. Soon after wards she returned, and Bolding was sitting in his chair, b;eeding very [as , Scandling was standing at the doer and deinandii.g gin, which she %vas-ob liged to give him. She sew all the prisoners and - others there e•they were flourishing their sticks, and VJNDON: Printed by Rzu_tir► At Ltie SUN.OFE apparently refoicim at ),vlia, lilid,l!ap7enecl. Patrick racz of the prisoners, stood flourishing a large stick over her head and: grinding his teet b.— They exclaimed, " who will affront an_ Irishman ?" After a.timelhey alt departed, John Biker, John Fat mer, and Mary Farmer, gave,. tesiimony to the • same purport with the last witness, with the addit , m)al chcumsAances,. that thty swore they Would order cone one before they left the house. And. by the eyidebce . 9f Gay and Tippett, the two s quaiiered.at . the house, it appeared _that the landl: id, the motm i nt the Irish men entered,..sent them to bed to b,e out of balm's way ; but that .. the ruffians searched • the wholebonse to find the. or! r viho had (Mended them, and„ - Peats swore if they . coold not find.,Wrn they would murder some one clue in the house.. _ An old oat) of the name of Quand, _who was in the house when they came, attempted to run-away, but soma of them follow( d him, knoekel him down, heat Out three.teeth, and by kicking him dislocated -fiis hip.- , The servant in the house repeated . the ,circum stances nearly in the manner, of the first witness. The prisoners being altd upon, left their defence to their CoUnsel, and called seyeral witnes!es, who attempted to prove they were not present, ,but they gaire such evident proofs of falsity and prevarication that the Jury seemed to pay no attention to their testimony. The Learned Judge then summed up the evi dent e With great mtinteness, and stated' the law from _ Lord Hale, that when a party as‘ocistid . for an unlawful purpose; either of _ beating -a Man or ' committing any trespass, and a murder., was c9m mittedin furtherance of the joint design,.all who were present, in law were guilty of that .nmrder.— He then remarked upon, the •xidence as apphed each, and observed that the ants or words of vio lence. were proved upon . all the prisoners, except Sullivan, and with respect to him it was proved that he, was present, armed with : a ;bludgeon. The Jury found them all guilty, but tecommend ed Sullivan to mercy ; which .the Learned Judge said he should attend to. His LOrdship immediately sentenced them all to. be executed on Saturday mnruing. Thomas Rudd, aged. 72, was coovi6ted of stealing . . bark from the estate of Admiral Ptah •Harvey, at Clitgwell, and sentenced to twelvemonths impri sonment. The principal evidence tor the prosecu tion was Mary .13loomfietd, who had been detected in the same practice, but who was adiniued w give evidence. Susan Draper, a' very interesting well dressed yuung woman, the daughter of a small hrtner at' Hol,and, in this county, was indicted for stealing in Mr. Jarrold's shop, at Weeley, a piece of cotton, value ten shillings. . •_ _ _ Thomas Brook, foreman to Mr. Jarrold,_prov.eu that the prisoner, in company with her sister, came . to the . shop .hftween two and four o'clock, in the afternoon,. and atter looking at a variety .of goods, the aster bought a gown. •On the pri,oiter turning to leave the shop, Brooks observed sowpcinifi;sion and - bus-le, and at the same time saw that the prisoner's pocket stuck out very much ; he therefore , challeag ed her with hav'trig stolen sometiimg„,which hs 0,- sired her to take out Of her pocket,' and. it proved to be a gown-piece. No - other evidence was called, neither could thiii unfortunate girl produce any per-- son to , speak to her character. The Jury found the prisoner guilty. The-Judge observedobai•in coniequence of the prisoner's youth, aithough.it was in his power to transport her ; he should pass - a more lenient set tehce, in hopes that the - time she spent in confine ment would be ;used in reflecting on - the very hem? ou ! . offrnee she had committea, and ,induce her 'to resolve upon a cur ore conduct Irss dtsgracetul her self:arid Iriends. Hip Lord,hip then ordered her to he confined in the House of Correction six calendar months. - Elizabeth - Car was fOund Ofconebaling the birth of her child, but was acquitted . of Ihe murder. She was sentenced to twelve months imprisoornent in the House of Correction. Samuel Mounser ,A as conviaed of au unnatural crime, and received sentence of death.' HUArINGDOIVSHIRE LA,IIIIIAS ASSIZES, AUGUST 13. A very important cause was tried at these Assizes befbie Mr. Just ice .1-1 EATH and a Special Jury, which; when • ultimately decided, will be of the utmost `consequenceto every occupier of mills subsisting upon the - different streams in the country. The aCtiou was brought by Owsley Rowley, E4q. as possessor of certain adjacent meadows, against the occupiers of Saint Nees' Paper mills, in this county. for not repairing certain piling and banks near the flood-gales' abutting upon those mea dowS, an 1 for keeping so great a head -of water for worni:g AO mills that the oerplus or .waste waters were diverted. down the . back. stream run ning between the meadows, to the injury of the plaintiff. • It appeared upon the trial, the mills and the mea dow were formeily the propet ty of distincrpersons, but by - put - chase were become the property of the plaintiff, who, thus possessed of both estrtes, had -let the mill by lease for term of _a I years to ihe defendants, whom- he bound to lay out the sum of 40001. The great quesiicrs in the cause, were, whe ther certain repairs of the piling and hanks of the meadow below the flood-gates of the back water stream of the mill, ought.- to he repaired by the plaintiff, as posessod of the Meadow ;",or by the defendants -as tenants of the mills ? And wbethtr the deretidants, by their 4x - tanner of winking the tnillS (thus bound io be erected by the deferaints)' did not keep up too great a head of cater? The evidence on the part of the tlaintiff stated, that the injury done to the batiks of like piaintitf meadow was occasioned by, the flowing of water" through the flood 7 getes with greater force than! necessary ; occasioned by the increased head Of urtter ,whii:h the plair.tiff alle - gtd was kept up at the milt's. On the part of the, defendants the evidence stat ed, Thatoly a' proper. head was kept, and that it was impO,s ble - ,that the injury complrined of by . the plaiutiff could have arisen from :my misma nagement at the mills, it being proved that every possible paUS Were taken that the head should . be k'-pt in unikoitni beigfit; :and that Men were al. teruately einvloyed by the defendkints c,ery _twenty - four hours, to watch the state .of the water ; and whenever the water rose 'above . the usual wider-_ mark; - to draw it - off by the proper' gates; and' that such water-mirk did not ekCeed the height of that of the p eceding tenant'. The plaintiff had laid out 151. 124. 9d. in 'repair inglhebanks and iiiiitig : Lbut in this action he laid his dkriages at s'ool. ••• Mr. Seijeant PF,CKWELL and Mr. §TORKs,lCourt sel for the defendants, look at) objeoi.ay to titena-, tore of the-361*i on the following ground. That a's the defendants wire lessees of • 'plaintiff, - he should have brought his action, on if w covenant to repair in that capacify, and' not 'as pos 7 - • sensor or - occupier of .the' meadows :-2d),, That the present action, which wzis art a6ion on the case, conld not be so Maintained at ilte suit of the plain- . tiff against: the defendants, as a Common Lasr rente qty. ' Tin- .rute appeared of flits pinion, and :conse.- quently reset ved the point far the judgment of the - COurt oP King's Bench; next Nichaeltrias Term; and his Lord Ship, in summing tip, Stated the expect- Sivelerms stipulated by t plaint tff Upon the d fendr ants,• in obliging .them to lay out so many thou- .. §and pound's' oil the plaintiff's own estate ; and that whatet'el might have been the usage in for repairs,- )'et it, had been sliewn, in evider.ce, that.the 'hunt ovements which the plaintiff had - (be neficially to iiiruilf) imposed upon ',the defeUdaMs in ereding such-extensive wdths, ITIUSUIIe - Ct sgArily • require-the Use of more water':' and should it there- ; fore Oftlinately:bileterniinnedif* pLintiff might'be to any - s-Mail damages Ocasioted by a larger head of water, he must and ought to be cotiten'ed . to pay for a litt'oaa'gritillt - datUage, when he had by his "leaSe•required - iMptinernents io the 'extent of su tu*y thou-a: d pounds from the de'feiiddi,ts' ; ,. that •if the-plaihtiti expected such enormous. iM provements, it was uttieasonable he should recover ens-, and therefore be reser,e the point'o• The Jury found 0 . verdict for the plaintiff for tbi: 121: . 'gd. the ,saniount 'of the repairs ; and a, the JGdge 'reseried the point of law, conse quently tlx cause vs ill ► . not ultinLiely be decided I'll next Term; At .Nort : Wampton AS§izes the following cause was fried PERCIVAL AND SON V. HOWES. . • This was a cause that had excited great interest. The' ction was brought for, recovering ; the sun of 50601. which was lent by the plaintiffi to Mr. Rich. ' Mat riott, of Northamptbp, during the run upon his batik in December last, under thefollowing circum stances. Several of the friends of Mi. M. at that time gave him. promissory noteS, payable at six months, to the arimUnt of about 29,0001. including notes drawn by Mr;Walion, of Brampton, to the amount of 50001. which it was •proposed should be deposited With. Messrs. Masterman, in London, ire! order to induce them to advance ,to Mr. M. what tnoney might be wanted to answer the demands . made upon him ; and 60001. was brought . dc-wn. by Messrs. Hayes and Bull, who were deputed to ar range this business with MeSgs.-Masterman, on the above securities being deposited,; but declined ad vancing.more upon them , saying, that if the friends of Mr. M. could procure acceptances of person in London, they, Messrs. Masterman, .Would athar.ce to any reasonable amount. On the Saturday Morn ing, Dec. 16, when Hayes and Bull returned with the 50001. and mentioned the determination of , Masterman's, it was agreed among Mail jut t's friends, that suet, acceptances should be procured, and the former notes deposited with the persons giving such acceptances as'counter securities ; and bat Hayes and Bull should immediately return to London with bids drawn on such persons as it was supposed were ' sure of accepting. But as the 50001. was deemed insufficient to open the bank witit on Saturday, it was -proposed that M , :ssrs. Percival should be re quested to assist' Mr. M. with 50001. more' 'in case of its being wanted. To this proposition Messrs:P. replied,: that if they were sure they should have it . again on the Tuesday morning,Hlo . ..king . .(a fair -day at Northampton) they would advance what might be wanted 'on that , day, - Saturday, and ,on the Monday following, to the amount of 50001. After most of the notes had been disposed of, and the defendant being asked whether he could not procure his friend Williams's acceptancie for the note which he had pre ciously given, he said he had no doubt but he could, and it they would' give him Walton's, tour notes for • 60001., he would endeavour to procuie his accept- anCe.i . for that amount also. It was afterwards set tled that the defendant should go to London on.t he Sunday, in 'order that he might return by Tuesday Morning. On his arrival in town, he found that those notes of Walton were in the hands of Messrs. Masterman, pledged with the, others:for . the 50001.. taken down by Hayes and Bull on the Satuldu ; but succeoed , in procUring, acceptances 'for 20001. which, with the :xceptances obtained by Hayes and Bull, were on Monday evening taken to. Master win's,. who advanced 'j000). to Hayes, Bull, and the. dd . e.ridant, with this injun6iion, that unless on their return to Northampton they shotild find, upon ex _aMination of Marriott's affairs, 'that it would be suf . - ricient to,answer the purposes intended, they were not to, part . with any, at it. At. the same time Messrs. Masten -Ilan agreed to pa' such part. of 'Marriott's notes that might be presented at their home to the • amount of 50001. more. • It was attempted, on the part of the plaintlift, to prove,-that in the conversation which took place with Messrs. Percival relative to the sum of 60001. advanced by then] on the - Saturday, that the defen dant' had renderedliimself liable to the re 7 payment thereof, but this the.evidenco , adduced failed to sub 7, stinCate. Some disnicsinn took pi bet We e leading counsel for the defendant, and lI Bidguy, :eading cnunsel fox the. reveal", the _evidence wlAdr had been brutight tor;ar 4 ; the Leirned .Ind. , ,e, Baron on, being Ci e° ) 4 ,. Thhtn; of !pinion that the plaintiffs had' railed in niol‘itio :s out their case, they were consequently. nonsuited* • At Lincoln the ,following prisoners were • when our accounts were sent from ihai•city FCI Isaac Bowers was put to the bar. It was S° by the ,wrtuesses, that in, January,. 1810, 'ie' ' 13 4 been " tried at Pererborpnah • Sessioti- stealing ihrt. pigs; sentence Was not Then passed againsi 11.1111 , but the ease relerrtd to die Judges.. At the s' - ' 3 ; ceediiig sessions, in May, he was sentenced ' 0 '''.‘lif y(!irs transp.orfation beyond the seas--ire fte of the 10th he calreted Lis escape, of a rope which had been thrown over.ti , o ‘A all, and fastenedA° an adjoining irte : fre r '. () ; ( 1 . tried for being . found at larg e heroic the'exn.ia' of the term fur wt.ich fie was sentenced to be ' r l"j r . ported. This thoughtless fellow was apprelo l ": 4 on the 52,3 d 'of SurLe, in '.Lincoln, an, - •roj crl , 6 iii exposing ` himself ) a period; so.earl - , were he was likely to be knoWn, was ecral-k°_.„J his-apparently total unconcern while the J tidv on tiled 'the sentence 6f 'death. He Seetit: 4 redly unmoved, and - went out'of COUr its he in, proof againStlLe influence of the passion of the human m!tid. 77rothas lately of f-Tc.lnstk:•ll • "ter, was cO(ttiCied of stealing t!,,et• !:ens :ii' • cock, ttie propetty George Hill, of -`-" o 11 Cllt Gus „ farmer, At these Assiies an'unus6al number Of Causes o.re e entered. TLe only out of . public interest %va.; 31 it ditZmeitt' against - the inhatitantS of the Cog"', Oxford for nor repairing a bridge over a bids of the river. Thames, near Sunning, called l ij ," b e. Bridge, to which. they pleaded; iiiat two 1Adk 6491 -„ i d name of Rid), the descendaut s • o r ihe reipeelable family .that name, formerly of i ping k; were. bound to repair the bridge, ifi r r o' sequence of the tenure o f ce r t a i n teneme ,.ts• uP, 3 a the evidence it appear e d, that ,been in the habit, as far back as living test i ' could reacdi, until the year-180'i, of ,doing call t fr pals whirl:brid;e ueeded, .11 E u t he Con. of Oxford never expended afar:thing upon if , . - 0 , The Learned Judge, Mr. Justice LA wirati( o '. e r plaited the law (o . be, iirat a County tk : as g e/1- ,id bOUnd to r.qair all • M it, utiess t I , e) . : c ' ) throw the. burde:t upon private individuals 3.1 a Such liability : the best evidence was, that Si)i) vidnals had been used to do the repuir;. he observed, all the • \v..; en cue. SLC , *. r e . being disputed that the faintly had alw4-! ti 'o paired the tiri•:ge. ihed, t:ver, % , 4 of special one, found a' Kerditt, that the -"County of Oxford were bound to repatr' tt bridge. • • At Oxford an indiEttnent \;;P. tried at Nis/ iv against the- tWo'Mi'sses "Rich (the same laJi o were concerned the. cause above-reper! e ' l, Abingdon), ler not repairing TWyford Berkshire. On their behalf it was contended , o the County of Berks was bou n d o f common ob repair this as a public bridge but .it apPew'"g, the Rich family had been al wa)..s used to ( 10 t ' ; ', e .,o( l pairs, the Jury, which was a common 6ne, the defendants liable. "t Ai theie Assizes John Bennett was con'" 1 " a d, r being at large while under sent e nc e ofiwsiO•' . awl received sentence of death. lett 1° '' cution. Sunday afternoon, at Faversham, whits , t!le ' of Mr. John Huut, of chat aged sixty-one, was at the ground of 'in;ell" attended by his wife and th e rest. o f t 'l e l l c , as mourners, •Mrs.,Hunt, - . throOgh extr..tre f e ,o/ tion, was taken suddenly 111, and expired il l `1 minutes Sri IP Zvi IrA . GRAVFSSNO, AUGUST r 6. C('''' Sailed—the Rving States, lennings, for. Virginia ot t , : juror, Cooke, for Gibraltar ; Catherine, IVyly. act- ice, 1 `" t')att, for Lisbon ; and the CornModore Prebble, luh New-York. _.1.---/* B Rtll3 R ICJ 11 Y£ST2 Bank Stock, 2621 i Navy s per tent.99i-i Irish .5 per Cent. 4 per Cent. 8 . 5 3 per Cent. Rea. 3 per Cent. Cons. '6B Bank L. Ann. 18 9-arthsi RD HARRIS. of No. 4, Martlett.court, Bold-street; and Pc - blished by WILLIAM ARMIGER SCRIPPS, South Molton.street, Grosvenor tquatc- ICE, No. i 12 ) Strand, where Advertisements, Orders for the Paper,_Lefters for the Editor ex. (post-paid), must be addressed. o dic, Yesterday, at ‘Valrner Lady of ralve s Esq O . fa S and Heir. . - s - • n t o le 3p:11 on ult.-Mrs. Millanike, wile of Captaii , 1 ,!.. 0 3 46 banke, R. N. of Blackwell,' near Darlington, of 3 Heir. - On'the I ith inst. at Cave Castle, in the East • -1 1)4 00' Yorkshire, tile Lady of Henry B. Barnard, Esq. of a ter. , AlAwk it i). ' Af' On the 4th• inst. at Wenslei, Mr. Mathew Det. ).oti, • ► l:l‘f' torney at Law, to Miss - Nlai ilia . Stali) Hutt. of the 541,'e l' , t daughter of the late Thomas Stap) , l too, Esq. I IS, At Ditchling, Sussex, lii,rer W i' . dwasds, ag e ' Miss H. Herriutt,ears awl 3 mouths. s;i rt .. , 7 On, f uesday the 7‘ll nist. at St. 'Ceury.e.N, flanover• i,li , Lieote,ant-Colonel Culquhoun .Grant, of the ii' ll ,, Hussars, to Miss Richards, of Dorsetshr . On Wednesday the Sin inst. at B11(114(.100, ill the i ,,icr° of Kincardine, North. Britain, runes Loa.. Esq h 3r ,. 1. 1 4 ' 1) ( '' Law, to Miss Ann Orr., youngest daughter 91 rat"' Esq. of Bridgeton. • • Ceara` ~ • Ott' Saturday last, at •Barton-uncier-Needworm , .1, .).,-, Birch, Esq. of Blackenhall, Stitfu,dsnre, t, Miss o )c i i,,ie only daughter of the late Thomas Coekayne, Ebq' ' - !'' ford-House, Herts. .cr, On Tuesdny se'nnighti , at St. Michael's, %Store s ' ti , ' 1 iit , .1 Nev. Edward lV innington log,rant, Rect..r of Staiio r( .1/ 01 ' County, to Miss lane OnsloW, second (laughter ot 1 1 ''' of Worcester. . . t‘r otY; Lately, Edwin R. j. Green, Esq. a Major in th e ,, i)eJ t to NliSs Frances tl. Cotton, secowt•daugfver of the,L,l''' , , of Chester._-/r „ . DIEp. of r-e l. On Monday last, at Bath, Mr. Daniel M' Farlani j, where hl had gone for the benefit of the waters• str otr ol On the tzth inst. at his house, Maryland Point, Essex, Richard Hirons, Esq. .aged 79: , V.,' .. Ci lc , Lately, in.Lonclon, alter a snort illness, Robe Jc i ,: Esq. late- of • Kilpureel and Cottage; both in 1 11 ': County,' Ireland. ---"/ .11 ()CA'S 'RDAy; India StoCK, India 13otios, 255.2 65,245' Excheq. B i ns, z s, 6s• P r ' i t n e d st ii i . t ora • Ditto Ann. ct .• Nty tht ih e 'Lk or t ro: ‘4,11i u. co l e ve ,t 4 t he re;t;,, toiktiostr, Ills tit ~led'et the of t h e _i to 'r eitti t4 (t tun mi rs) t ° l ly r itt, d t 1 1 11(1, as 1,4 k 11. 'K 4tl eti), clite, only e '‘Ri ° WeS 14j, tO hiV ,j e t 4 RlOre kr lc .. ts 11 1e ( i 4 ,t ra y., r 111 1 1 1 3. w is i i k e i d l i a lt I 11, t 11 SI I ribu a t ', C' Let e t" w eelbal:1" .I\4 1 110 tli7 Or Pe ufCltieS, tti to 4 i an) ~th nth, 414 arts t: r , Is an • V l 'ce tti gdqlv ers°ll . ll t t I tei 4 1 4.. Ti 4t the K.,,11 Y - r t T A,. i• 4 k ' vt, Lo, tA; P i * IH `c, 6 e.la til 11. "C ar id ( l'ard 4 ° I M ' ( l 3 F gi gt!:tio ° l 11;leglianey W e e . ri c th c 4. 114 .r, t Ilif . 4 11t s _ a , V a t u4b , i Sol , e R "i wh , ; bl4qi,b°tt le 11, 'S Sl4l l 1 IQ -. StUt) ;~1 ~~