The Sun. — London, England, 1818-06-25 00:00:00

KENT coUNTY MEETING. A Meeting of the Freeholders of this County, "for the purpose of nominating Candidates to re prevent them in Parliament, was on Thursday on Penenden Heath. A circuity ring was formed on the Heath, nearly in front of the Con., t lionse, around which waggons were placed for - flee High Sheriff and the respective Candidates Frauds, - while the intervals were filled tip by the carriages of the Gentry, and the Yen manly nn horsebai-k, and the centre occupied by those on foot. Ily the hoar of noon the Candi dates and a very large number of the Freeholders. we-se rn;sembled, at which time Win. Henry ,lock, Esti. the High • Sheriff, having taken his station, opened the business of the day,. by re qnes!ing the attention of the Freeholders, while the requisition under which he called them toge ther was read. The Under Sheriff then read the repisition, after which the High • (Assent ed, that in compliance therewith they were now summoned, and he had only to entreat of them. that they would hear with patience- and candour every Freeholder who might address them. Wm DEi , DES, Esq. in an appropriate speech, then proposed Sir Otiward Knatchbull, who had been known to the county for 24 years, as a fit and proper person again to represent it. The no mination was seconded by Wm. Alexander Mor land,-Esq. THOMAS HAL . LETT HODGES, Esq. next proposed Sir Win GEARY, as no new mats, but one whose character and independence was well known.' Thomas Papillon, Esq. seconded this nomination. JOHN WARDE, EMI. then proposed the name of one who was bred up in the principles of his an cestors, who had been most active to secure the '-independence of the County, a young man of in detatigable mind, of ample fortune, and what was 'better than all; of incorruptible mind, and there fore the most proper person to send to Parlia ment—such was Win. Philip Honeywood, whom be should recommend for that purpose. ROBERT FOOTE, Esq. seconded the nomination. The several Candidates then addressed the rnee , ing . in the order in which they were nonsi •:.-nated, expressing their political principles, and the &aims under which they appealed to the -choice of the Freeholders— Sir-EnwAttn KNATCHBULL urging his public conduct generally and individually, and calling on •any one should say that he hait not done his duty to come forward and state in . what he had neglected it. Sir Wm GEARY stated, in a firm and dignified manner, the independence of his principles, and explained in the most' ingenuous and satisfactory manner to the whole Meeting the reasons which bad prevented Iris mute constant attendance in 'Parliament . dliting the last Sessions ; and %voids want of attendance arose from his having expend ed-no less a soul than TwENTY-EIGHT THOUSAND - POUND , to maintain an Independent seat in Parlia ment, and from which circumstance he could not, consistently with his situation as a married man, ed'ord ,he ,sixpences of 'keeping a house in Loin -don ; but these obstacles were now removed ; it wlts=tis full dwernvnation to pay unremitting Et.. - WItiol; to PailiaMentary duties, should lie be again elected is Representative for the County of Mr. W. P.'EloNywooD said, that he had come forward to the .express solicitation of those who 'had for nearly forty years fought under his uncle and father, for the independence of the County. Mitch interesting conversation then arose, and -questions were put to the Candidates on the sub iects of the Catholic Question and Parliamentary Reform. n 'the sequel the High She Tiff proposed the sv veral Candidates for the choice of the Freeholders; di~eeting those in their favour to hold up their hands ; after which he declared, that his judg ulent the shew of hands was in favour of Mr. Hollywood and Sir Edward Knatchbull. No, No !" was exclaimed by some of the friendi of Sir William Geary ; but Sir William observed, that he should not question the decision of the High Sheriff, but appeal to the poll. The High Sheriff then tleclaro the Meeting aksolved ; alter which %TWIN CALCHAVT, Esq. -m,ved ThAnks to the High Sheriff for calling the Meeting, an4.l for hiS impartial conduct in the - Chlir, which was seconded by CHRISTOVHER 'Coo ,e, Etq., and carried with a few dissentient voicec. The [Ugh Sheriff returned thanks for the ho nou►r conferred on him, which he hoped be had deiet red. Slate of the Poll.—lfaidstone, June 24, Thtca o'Clack, Knatchbull .. 985 liuttywood 589 Crary 403 DEVONSHIRE NOMINAT/ON.—Monclay, the no ruination for Knights of the Shire took place at the Castle of Exeter. The Candidates for the representation of the Comity are Sir T. I). Ac -I,lod, Bart., N. B.:staid, Esq. and Lord Vis count Ebrington. Sir T. I). Acland was pro posed by Sir Safford El. Northcote, Bart. and seconded by Sir William Elton?, Bart. Mr. 1333.. tard :vas proposed by Sir John Rogers, Bart. and seconded by Arthur Campernowne, Esq.; and Lord Viscount Ebrington was proposed by the lion. Newton FeHowes, and seconded by Sir C. W. Blloptylde, Bart. Upon a she►v of hands, the High Sheriff declared the majority in favour of Lord Ehriugton ; but he could not decide as to Sir T. Acland and Mr. Bastard, the shew of hands appearing to him to be nearly equal. The Elee- Zion commences to-day. GENERAL ELECTION-(IRELAND.) City„rf Dublin Election is fixed for the 30th instant, the Sessions- I-louse, Green-street. It spileaYs !hat no Gentleman has seriously ihonght of standing fur the City in opposition to Illesrs. IGraitan and Shaw. Trinity College Election is fixed for next Thurs day, the '24th inst. Both Candidates, Messrs. P!ntiket ,nd Croker, are confident of mtccess. County of C. Domville has declined . the curtest, which will therefore he between Ne. , srs. Elitinikon, Talhot, and White. • •Cotinty of Cartotr.--TLie High Sheriff has fixed the Election for Montlay se'nnight, the 29th slant. Borough of Droghecla.—A private letter from Drogheda, dated June 14, says :—" Oar Election ill be warmly contested. Each party seems con fident of success." County of Wexford. ---The bustle - of Election has already commenced in tlae town of 'vVexford last week. Lords Stopford and Valentia were there, and the conducting Agent of Messrs. Colclongli and Carew (J. C. Martin, Esq.) is now there nakintf. airangements for the Committee Rooms, &c. Messrs. Carew and Colelough are also ac tively engaged in canvassing, and are expected in Wexford (1,61 y. Queen's County.—On Tuesday, Sir H. Parnell and ibe Right Hoff. W. W. Pole waited on the different inhabitants of Carlow, who are Free- holders of the Queen's County. " ‘Ve under stand," says the Carlow Morning Post, " that the success of both Gentlemen has been nearly equal in their canvass." The Election takes place' on the 29th instant, at the Court-house, in Mary borough. County of Kilkenny.—There will be no comes; for this County. The . High Sheriff has tired the Election for Friday the 3d July, to be held at Grace's Old Castle. _ . City of Waterford —Sir John Newport will he returtird. The Eleci ion is fixed for the 3Oth natant. County of Limerick.—The Candidates are the }lon. Mr. Q •in and - Colonel Odell., the Tate Mem bers, the lion. Mr. Fitzgibbon, anti Mr. S. ''Grady. The Eleoion is fixed for the hr of July - City of Limerick.--It seems there wig be nu contest tor the City. The Election is fixed for le 30th inst. County of Tipperary.--The Writ for holding an Election of two Knights of. the Shire for this County has arrived to the High Sheriff, and, we believe, will be proceeded upon on Monday, the 29 It instant. County of Clare.—Sir Edward O'Brien, Bart. arrived at his scat, Diontolauti, on Sunday last from London, where he had been attending. h is duty as one of the Representatives of this County in the late Parliament. City of cork.—Colonel Longfieid, Sir N. Col thnrst, the late members, and Mr. Hely Hutchin- son, have addressed the Electors. 'Cite canvass is continued personally and actively by Mr Hut chinson mid Sir N. Colthurst, and on the part ot Colonel Longfield, by his friends, that Gentle man not having yet arrived in Cork. The Southern Reporter says, "the canvass on both sides is cur ried on in the best humour, and there s ee ms no prospect that this amicable spirit will be broken or dispelled." County of Cork.—No address has yet appeared front either of the County Candidates, o►ving to the non-artival of the Writ, upon the date ot which so much 'will depend in deciding the contest. County of berry,—Th Kerry Election will bring all the force of the County into the field The Knight ot Kerry is sure ot his return—the contest will be between Mr. Crosbit•, one of the laic M. tubers, find Mr. Denny. A Limerick Pa.. . . per says, it is reported that the Honourable Mr. Mullins is a Candidate, in addition to the other three. County of Galway.—The Candidates nre the Right Hon. D. B. Daly, Mr. James Daly, ,and Mr. Ricl►ard Martin. It is the general opinion that Mr. Martin will he returned. Town of Galway.—Mr. V. Blake, the late Mem ber, is opposed by Mr M G. Prendergast. DREADFUL HURRICANE IN THE Mautttms.--- nil island was visited no the loot March by one of the most terrible hurricanes ever experienced there: A letter from Port Louis, of. the 16th of that month, describes Ihe damage incurred to be tremendous; the whole island was one scene of waste and destruction ; trees torn up by the roots, and many houses both in town and country laid flat v.alitable storehouses unroofed, &c. anti the. goods. within then completely spoiled. Up wards of 4 sail of large vessels, besides small craft, were driven on shore, or otherwise injured. The hurricane commenced at south-east ; and gradually veered to the north-east till six in the /morning, when it shitted suddenly to north notth-west, anti broOght with it the additional calamity of a heavy and overwhelming. sea; OLD BA:LEY.—Yesterday Joseph Anias, a re spertable master tnilor, in Mount-street, Gros venor-square, surrendered to take his trial on an indictment, charging him with having feloniously stolen, on the 10th January, 16 gilt buttons, the property of Messrs. Allen and Wilson, eminent tailors, in Bond-street, with Micro] he had lived seven years as foreman. It will be recollected that the prisoner was discharged by his em ployers, and afterwards commenced business, when they received information they had been robbed by the prisoner to a large amount ; they could not, however, identify any part of their property but the 16 buttons.--Mr. ADOLPHUS tended for the prosecutor, and Mr. ALLEY for the prisoner.--The Jury, after a perspicuous charge trom the Judge, immediately returned a verdict of " Not Guilty." COURT-MAHTIAL.-•••The soldier who circulated the falsehood relative to the steam•boat, which caused so terrible a sensation in this city, under went a trial by a Court-Martial, at eleven o'clock yesterday. Ile was arraigned and tried on two different charges, on both of which he was very properly and justly convicted. The first was for having deserted his post, while his duty required his attendance on guard ; and the second, for having maliciously propagated a report so inju rious to private peace, and so detrimental to the public order of time city. We understand that the unfortunate man was condemned to be flogged, and notwithstanding very considerable excrtiou on the part of Mr.O'Brien was humanely made to res cue him from the merited chastisement of his offence, the sentence was put in execution at two o'clock. This example will, we hope, be long remembered, and must powerfully operate in deterring, any other individual from gratifying so malicious a disposition, at the expellee of domestic happiness and public peace.—(CorkAdrertiser, June 20.) LAW JNTELLIGENCZ. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE 24, Sittings fur Middlesex, before Mr. Justice HOLROY D and a Special Jury. LIBEL. MitiUs D. .LIVEIRA. An action f;;laintiges for A libel : the tleclara ion also contained counts for verbal slander. _ The pleadings having been opened by Mr. CHITTY, _ _ . Mr. GURNEY, in introducing the Witnesses for the plaintiff, observed, that his client was a school master of high respectability and attainments at Catsbalton, and the defendant a Madeira merchant, of great opulence. The libel and slander of which the former complained were of the grossest kind, anti directed against the plaintiff not merely with a view of detracting from his reputation, but avowedly with the design of ruining his school.—. 't he Jury would be aware that to no man could character be more precious than to a person in the situation of the plaintiff, and if they fouNd (as they would find In this case) that it was wanton and unprovoked, they would award exemplary damages. The tlefend:tnt received a recommen dation of the plaintiff's" school from some book sellet s, the publishers of a Catholic periodical work called lite " Laity's Directory," and he ac cordingly sent his three sons there, paying, as was the itavaiiable rule of the establishment, for six months in advance. The boys had not teen there long, when the fither, the defendant, showed symptoms of dissatisfaction without 'any cause, and proceeded to inlet fere even in the ma naeeinent 'Of the school. He did not approve of the dancing master, and he thought that his sons • were Class , d too low, with many other tittionnd. : ed and frivolous complabits. He, finally,wit bout notice, took his sorts away, and insisted upon the repayment of the greater part of the money he had paid with them ; of course the plaintiff re fused, and the defendant instantly commeoced the attack, of a part of which the present actian was matte the subject. lie first wrote the libel in serted in the declaration, being a letter to Mess's. Keating and Brown, the booksellers, who had spoken in favour of Mr. Milius, the plaintiff. It was in these gross terms : " Gentlemen—As you recommend Milius, it is a duty owe the pnblie, to tell you that he is as low, mean, and vul gar a wretch as ever I saw in any situation. I shall be ne cessitated, to go to law to gels back my money. I cannot com prehend on what ground you could mention suclLa wretch, brought up in *he meridian of St. Giles's ; who was after wards an usher in Mi. King's, school, in Chapel-street, and since kept a school in Little Wild-street, Lircoln's Inn-Gelds, and two more in the neighbourhood of Red Lion-square, when you ought to have. known that not half-a-dozen respect able English tamilies have intrusted him with their sons. Per haps not att, or if they did, it was hV mistake. l'he Laity's Directory, which I bave'been in the habit of taking in of you, and %1 here I saw this blactiguard,and whom, till then, I did not know,l shall never see again while such a cursed school exists. " Your's respectfully, &c." Besides this unwarrantable and disgracefnl letter, the declaration contained counts for slander ; tor Mr. Oliveira, in the height of his malice, in dustriously went about among the friends of many of the boys at Mr. Alilius's school, abusing him, Charging him with swindling, incompetency, and giving the children few provisions, and tho, , e in a state not fit to be eaten. To several Gentlemen he bad avowed it to be his intention, if' possible, to ruin the plaintiff, by repeated and unfounded calumnies. tinder these circumstances, Mr. Mi litia had tin cliciice but to serk protection from these attacks at the bands of a Jury, who would award him such amide damages as his injuries de. manded. Mr. R. Brown, a bookseller in Doke-street, Gtosvenor•'quare, carrying on business with others, und-er the firm of Keating, Brown, and Kerving, knew the plaintiff well ; he was a schoolmaster at Carshalton. The witness pub• fished •` The Laity's Directory," in which the plaintiff's school was advertised; the libel was de livered to Mr. Keating, and the witness believed it to be the writing of: the defendant, who was a native of. Madeira, and a foreigner obviously by his dialect. Mr. Keating proved the delivery of the libel to him by a clerk of the defendant. The witness had recommended the plaintiff's school to the defendant, who sent some yottis gentlemen to it ; whether his suns or not be could not state. tic received the letter, about March last : the defendant had previously 5 1 11,11,C11 Mare:pectfully of the plaintiff. The libel was then read iu the form stated by Mr. Gurney. Mr. Brown proved a second letter to hethe band-writing of the defendant, in which a demand was made front the plain tiff of the sum paid on the admission of the boys 1,, his school, (deducting a small sum fur their hoard, &c. since (hrist mas) within twenty-four hours. The defendant in the sante letter offered to leave the matter to arbitration. It was dated 9th March, 18i8. Mr. Charles Hutchinson, one of the ushers in the plain tiff's school, deposed that the plaintiff placed his three sons there: they were sent at the commencement of the last Christmas holidays. Cross-examined.—The plaintiff had kept a school at Car. shalton for six years. The wittiest had been with him since August last. These were 23 scholars—only two Lad left since March, exclusive of the defendant's 1,0118. Mr. W. Byrne, a merchant, was guardian of two boys of .the name of De Silea, whom about twelve months ago he placed at the plaintiff's school, where they still remained. A short time agi the defendant called upon the witness, but he could not at. all fix the date. A lung chain of witnesses were called to show, if possible, that this took place before Apt d, when the action was com menced; but the endeavour failed, and Mr. Gurney aban doned the evidence of Mr. Byrne. Mr. 'Fully Higgins bad a nephew at the plaintiff's school. The defendant came to the witness in March, as he believed, but it might be in April, or perhaps February, probably snore than three months ago. The witness had never seen hint before, but Mr. Oliveira asked what had induced him to send his boy to such a school? The witness replied, that he had understood that it was respectable: on which he observ ed, that Mr. Militia was a man not capable, and treated the buys eery ill; it was a place to which no gentleman should send his sons : the meat given to them was nut well dressed, but sent up taw. The defendant worked himself into a vio lent passion, and seemed endeavouring to prevail upon the witness to take his nephew away : he added, that he was determined t to injure Mr. Milius if he could; and talking a peat deal of his own wealth, he said that he did nut care what it cost him. Cross-examined—The defendant threatened to bring an acii - on — a - g . a .. Q - the plaintiff, and would do him as much in jury as he could : the witness was distinct in his recollection of the words. He had nut taken, and would nut take away his nephew. Mr. E. P. Fordham had called upon the defendant on the 9th of April last, in consequence of some reports he had heard. The defendant called the plaintiff a scoundrel, a vil lain, and a swindler; said that his school was ill-conducted, that the meat was raw, and not enough of it. The witness had sent his son to the school three days before. Cross-examined.--He had never known Mr.Oliveira before,. but called to learn the cause of the dispute between hint and the defendant. Air. GURNEY then offered evidence of parents and children, to show that there was no pretence for the' slander of the defendant. He also pro . posed to recd Alr. Byrne, even On the uncertainty of the date, in order to shove quo animo the dl' tendant uttered the slanders. ttl Mr. Justice HOLROYD conse nted to re ceive evidence on the authority of a cas e i 0 Strang ° which his Lordship generally referred 10. h 110 w i t h w. .. 0 3 ,1 Mr. Byrne then stated, that the defendant, had had no previous acquaintance, had called upon ht!uss said that he had thought it right to do so, totally unfit to have the care of the two boys, to wburn • witne.ss was guardian. He (Mains) was wholly unfit ford station, and a notorious swindler, so much so that be h o ts obliged to withdraw his sons. The' meat given tat he th 'o as Mr. Maui o s was very bad ; .and.tbe defendant added in his Pi" s id they fed like swine, and that proper attention was n ot F. er , to their instruction. lie then read ter.; very allusive he had written to the plaintiff; he was determined to. c°,4 use n et a prosecution against him, and from w hat be bad :I t , it was the duty of the witness to remove his boys. The of iarss answered, that he was well satisfied as top e 'e instrti_re, of his wards, as he had examined them only t w eek btlu o s and the boys seemed well contented with the 'num-Ishii) they received; however,.after,this strong representation, ja would make inquiries, upon which the defendant began 315 08 with greater warmth, and left the witness Cerra made an investigation, and was completely tisfied Uo_,f, points. Mr. Oliveira swore violently, haft like a foreign; and not so glibly as an Englishman ; but he InUst have derstood the force of the word swindler. h fir fl f or t..e Cross-examined.—The defendant talked c almly three minutes : he went away without even the continuo 4 lilies; he seemed very much inflamed. abruptlY• lief (1 ]r. SCARLETT begged to be unders tood t objected to this evidence, as subsequent to IP defendant, complained suing out of the writ in the cause. :M n l a i n his e a d t al the Mr. SCARLETT,. a little hardly dealt with, as the evidence in respect corresponded with the declaration" Ptirott cularly regarding the slanderous w ords truPt.i t if i The count that referred to what had beet ' sa e the last witness and Mr. Higgins, was tramedli itidtre his ss client to tlse h Jattsiryb efoil a special action upon the ease; an d the Lealt, Counsel submitted, that its order to mainta in , h e some special damage ought to be proved: too the defendant bad had no opportssuitY °1 tifying. • Mr. Justice HoLnoYn observed, that the fief was in fact for words, though the of them was only stated, and to them the.del" ant might have pat in a justification. aerl Mr. SCARLETT argued, lii4t 111 fairness , r e words ouglst to have been inserted in the adds 10 ' lion, that the defendant might have been 1 J" MP meet the precise charge. He contended th at go or Milius had been rather too forward in entl e4 4eti g eneral ing to put his hand into the Aetendant's 1)°;), whets he had already received mote mane); the he was entitled to ; he had contrived to g:doi whip•hand of the defendant, who had 06 t f re been extremely anxious respecting the vrel",:tirdi his children, and who felt somewhat 10 ga o in consequence of ill-treatment be had r e % o tht think they had received. With respee t it ;, s ti°g angry letter written by the defendant ta I ' 4 o ol and Co., he submitted that it was lineoll*.coloi not malicious ; and with regard to the N il te ° expressions, the 'Learned Counsel et,',, t , g r ; time Jury to recollect, that foreigners Ilk Oliveira, though they miglrt be ge fie t A i well acquainted with the language, dirt ':, ° % eli„ t ; derstand the precise force of words , espeCia"; used idiomatically. He illustrated this 14-aoli by two anecdotes that had come within l'i,slPe: ledge. One referred to a very Learned OF, who had filled a high magisterial situation i" A Pundit (so the native lawyers were , c „ s ti i ; designing to flatter his benevolence, ed" r , -' l ll' l petition to him in English. opening wi t ' ) II ( words, " lino% ing your worship t6 :OO 'l A 4 most pitiful fellow," &c. The pundit from intending any abuse, but he lead l' grossly calumniated the individual he WaSalefigil voering to conciliate. The second storY '•eive„ to a foreigner of high rank, eh() 409 ri-ned into the first circles here, and wi o at " he ev e. great a proficiency in our language, I" I - ore ) ; ventured to use proverbial expressions; 00c s , yotl fortunately, for he had seen at Nesetnark e :' ' ori tt o lady of great wit and beauty, win naturallY sd, the approbation and love of all who b e lield i , le ",bfe r , thiS foreigner had found in his dietionetY " e te I ° l i " to make one's mouth water ;" and vil' e9 d : o os ti ct l asked how he liked site young lady, ; vef l o lie could use it to advantage ; but he sa,V -r na l i 'd the phrase, and so misplaced the- ollt ° '',,e ll ";, represented the young Lady as having , bee-0;9114 of an act of the greatest indelicacy and tnill .,bemi lle e l In the same way the Learned Cownsel 4,05 that his client, in Isis hasty wrath, 1 ,, n io t the word wretch, which was thechief sti"f' libel: be lead not meant to attribu te to ►tlic,eol 'tiff that he was a wretch, in a sense of % o il , merely English, but probably only to I r d lei much as the French conveyed by their " q ; t io 0 : 1 1 heureux, which indeed was a literal trans'sreo. wretch: Upon the whole Mr. S c arlet 0 I ' . that this was a case for nominal damages, d etr. character of Mr. Milius and his S ch 001" 1 5. 1 sufficiently vindicated. d ur : Mr. Justice HOLROYD having Somme IP° Jury, after a short consnltat .gave Lb a verdict, with 150/. damages. • THE KING U. SAMUEL BROW". . 0 0 - 0 1 This was' an indictment for perjury I n to a bill in Chancery, filed by 1 151 1. P„ t t. Y rise names of Graham, Norcott, end p parties had been engaged in partnershiPP I obtained a patent tor some - improve m , e ;qo o mode of making casks. Norcott ive o° o ' tired on condition that they s hould roo t a far,' be n ot p but sum from the defendant • ...neer; o te ing his engagement, a suit in L;''' • h th e ta" commenced, in the course of whi d Was ' put o f on which the perjury was ass i g ns The case was not gone into, as a P re - wa s oj rp jection to the mode in which Ole I n f t v b e ; out in the indictment prevaile d, an die a judge in consequence directed that a eer quittal should be entered. ..._—_—____,.____---_. l re , . 4 11 it ic Yesterday, rdson, E i s n Upper , d Berkeley l i t e ß l e i c ' . 1 . ; 14 - street,S: - 5 t' q '‘ . 1..1'' r lti!'ht Hun. Lady Elizalnth Richardsuo, YO 6100 c , f 0 , . 44 - bou se ! f 3. On Sunday, het •2(1 ii ISt. at LOW CO..- odsjf tershire t the Lady of Captain Labe. Gate .3rlG i Of , .lA le AIARRIED• „, god Yesterday, at St. George's, Hanover-sqlor".,ov• , Esq. of Glitter-lane, to Miss Morris, of Chcl''' s 144 „ a hi, r.',o DIED. r - q. i On the 27th of October last, near Guntoo ' i . oe ~ro, Madras, Lieutenant George Fordyce Smith, (,) q . ' _, ? Cavalry, eldest sun of the late George Sulithy "" g i i 4 ' of Canton. A , o t w irg LONDON: Printed hy 13. CARsTAIK!', . ti ed yijit Ormond street, Queen-square; 31 " 1 t' t 411 SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South Nlolton-srre,:e4oeo Office, No. 112, Strand ; ,where Ad`` f ed , idtCrst C. (post-paid) galsat ad4rsts' 4 Ci ty . titi, f I . l ,tps 104,:, 44 4 r 4 ~~ `\ ~~•~i F~ th b q a