The Sun. — London, England, 1809-06-24 00:00:00

.&ro.Or_=_.!•,t ADMIR.ILT SE . SSIO S - FRIDAY, JUNE; This day an Adrm ,alty S sitous was 414 A t th e f;'d befor , Sir WA. 6COTT, Mr. Justice Gim•a, narrlolons Bench of Civihans, John Sutherland w a s tried for the wilful murder of Riehard.Wikon, by - wounding him in the lower' Fart of the bAly, on the bth of November last, with ild4k or dagger, of whip') wound he died on the i4too of November I:vit. 6one - count the Prisoner W;ts charged with having commuted the offence Upon the', seas, and in another in the Tagus. " John Thompson, an American black, vx ho served belbre the Wait as . able. seaman, deposed, that about a month before the fatal event took place • he shipped . with Captoin Sutherland (the pri soner' ar the bai), who was master of the brig Friends, which was at that time lying in the To6' Os, about a mile from the city of Lisbon. That vt,ssei wai at tbiit time in the transport .ser vide. On the day stated in The indilment, the Pri soner_ went` on shore ; the vessel had not her full complement of men 1 the crew consisted . only of the mite; llnd two foremsbt wen, besid,s the witness and the. tter;:cased. Time boy was not quite 13 years of agt:; be kilts cabin boy or servant to the Prisoner at 111 - ;:bar. On the Captain's return froth shore there was, no oae on board but the witness and the dr coa,:kii they were successively called into the cabin; the deceased was called Own to the Cabin a second , . time by the' Prisouer, and aouut five minutes of -terwards witness heard him sing ouf, calling on Kitt (the WitueSs) by name, repeatedly. Supposing' ;he .. Captain was only bearing the boy, as usual, be took!no notice, until the boy sung out repeatedly, and *fib more violence. He then went down to the Cabiri,where.he saw the. boy roiling pu the floor, apparently iogreat agony, with 'his bowels hanging out. The Captain stood over the boy with a.naked dagger in his' hand. The boy Abeviiit4 his . wound, said,'" See what Captain Sutherland has done to 111 e. The Captain at first said hearing, but on -• the witness proceeding to go upon deck again, the , C4Ptaio said, " know„,Jack, I have dome wrong.,.The Witness, in return said, " I see, Sir, you have done very es rung." Witness then went up and bailed the Elizabeth transport, which, lay near them, a beat with the mate and twd men belonging to that ship came alongside, but they did not venture to go , into the (Ain. The Witness then went with them to" his '..\.lajesty's 'ship Plantagenet, in order to pro- Core d sorgeon, but to no purpose. On his return to his o s reship, lm . leUnd the - Mate on board. The C:lptaio cttierc.i Ow'Witness to put onshore, to go bunt tor, Poctor, They went to the English bar racks,-but could nor find one. After walking about seine ti ~ e , Witness asked the Prisoner if he did Pot 10:011 to go oil (meaning to 11:s ship), to which time Prisoner answered, " No, but yon may go oft if you The Witeessi pow ever, stuck close to t he pri s eeer until they met an English and'a Porno - : geese soldier ; Witttess told them what had hap pened, and the Prisoner ‘‘ as conveyed on shipboard. 'inc Witness understood that in the meanwhile a' Surgeon had • come trent the Audacious man of war,. dressed tire' boy's:. wotitik• and had• him pm' , to. bed.. When' she Captain came on hoard,' the Mate asked him how he came to use such a deadly weapon' to the boy, pointing to time -dagger. The Captain snid; he would take care he shotild not hurt any one elseWith'it, and instantly•• threw it .overhomd. The Prisoner Was-next morne' , ing conveyed on board the Audacious; and - the boy was carried to that ship - alter , The Captain did not appear to be all convulsed, agitated, a alarm edat the time ef; the witness first going &Wl] into the cabin. Time, boy lingered under the coostant ap prehension of death for the space of nine days, and died on time t4th of November. Mr. Irvine, the prinCipahiergeon, and Mr. - Bligh, aisistant surgeon' df the Andacions,• described the nature of the wound. The Captain begged of each of the 'eurgeons separately to do what they could to save the , bay's life, adding, " for by so &sing you may be the means of saving. He said that he had - committed the deed in a fit- of 'rage and intc'xication, adding, that he had been rAbed and plunderd 'by the crew, tut neve"' sail. a, sem d ; WY. .• They were fully cOuviticed that the Wound wailhe cause oPihe boy's:death,' : Whilst the boy'ssitrs under the most 'serious apprehension of 'his - dissolution, Mr. Irvine took down writing his declaration, in -which he stated that Captain John Sutherland at fireegavebitn a slight woun4Jupon;which'the.,boy exposedthe wound to him, Saying, " See what you• have done to me,;" upon , which the' Captain in flieled on him -a second wounde which was more desperate than the former, This : was witnessed by the surgeons, and attested with the mark of the boy, then almost dying. , . e • 'There was. another. witness on the. part of the pro secution, but, it was agreed by the Counsel On both sides, that it 'was unnecessary to call him. Sir ChriStophen Robinson stated the:case to the Jury; the 2 4 ettorney Generalexamined the St itnesses - ; they Dross-enamined by Messrs. Knapp and Gurney, Ceunsei for. the,Prisener. . 'Abe Prisoner when called upon- for his defence, go'd the( he left it entirely to bur - v Couesel • ; eral very respeaable men gavethe Prisoner an excellent chara4er lor-general humanity and .mild ties 'of disposition, previous to the.present transac- Item• - LAW PEP DliT. COURT OF KING'S BEN9I, lvtiE 23. 1 ' GREAVES, E 54. V. teRHOVSE. ' i This - -was an adion brat h(by Admiral GREAVBS eseli against the Proprieters of the Exeter mail-Coach, to recover the stiff! of 211. Ins. 6d. which the Plaintiff had paid for four insid i e places to Exeter, and one outside, on the 200' April last. It was proved by the Plaintiff's Solicitor that the Defendant had ac-1' knowledgcd to - him;..and the Plaintiff, when they called upon hitn,the next day, that he- had. promised, the Plaintiff when he:took - his places, that the coach should call for him at his lodgings, ata-boot-maker's, ! Opposite Northumberland. Huu-e, the Defendant' only denying that the Plaintiff mentioned the num ber of the house. On the part of the Defendant, the Clerk of t he coach-office said, that nothing wore was agreed between the Plaintiff and the Defendant than ' that the coach should call at Charing-Cross. The fi-1 ' was that the Defendant went out of town, after do ing nothing more than writing in his book, " Mr. Greaves, Charing,Cross ;" so that the conserpience was, the Defendant's son told the coachman to call at the Golden Cross, which lie did„ and not finding his passengers there, left town Without them, The Plaintiff would have taken the coach the ncxt day instead ; -but the Defendant refused it, and said the Plaintiff was entitled to nothing but what the coach earned in its road to Exeter, -`llle defence .was, (let it was quite.out..ot the Defendant's course to.suffer his mail-coach to call at any house for passengers but the regular . inns:, . and: that be. could ,not have made any such agreement with the Plaintiff as had been. proved.:: . . . I Lord ELLENBOROTIGH dirdied the attention of the Jury to the strong evidencoof the)Delenclani's ac knowledgment to the Plaintiff's Solicitor, and point- ed out the prehttbility of the clerk's being. mistaken, as it was not likely the. Plaintiff should give his ad dress only " Charing-cross."—Verdietfur . the Plain tiff, 211. 10s. 60, which was the money: he paid. , • PARIS. This was an action to recinPer6l. 'Or the expences incurred by the Plaintiff in going to Chatham -and Sheerness,' in Order to effeauate the release of the son of the Defendaht; 'who hal been impressed and was on 'board a ship. The Defendant's son being impressedi•t he Plaintiff had procured two persons to be received at the -Admiralty in 'his'stead, and a dis charge to be granted by .the .Board of AdMiralty in his behalf, for which he was paid sixteen guineas a head, and it appeared that he had been a crimp and regular dealer its that way. -.For the Defendant it was shewn, that upon such an occasion all thin WaS . adually necessary to be done wasp to procure . a letter from the AdMiraity to the Port Admiral, and that then 'the seaman would 'be immediately discharged'. This the Plaintiff must have Itnown. Lord atuttuottotmi ihotight, that the charge al together was an iinposifton, for it could not brh sup posed‘that. the Admiralty would throw any obstacles in the way of tine release of the seaman, atter the father had pit two good and able men in his stead...—. Verdiet for the Delendont. • WILLIAMS U. NURSE. Mr. PARKE stated that this was an aElion for an assault., The. Plaintiff was a poor womau, and the Defendant kept a public-heuse in King street, Co vent-garden.. The Plaintiff was at his hobse drink , in a pint of beef, and. ,chancing to give him Some offence„ what it was she kneW not, the Detendaut .violently thrust her out of doors, and gave, her a kick in a very improper place, by which she was consi derably bruised. • She called a witues4 who proved that, he saw the . woman'come trembltngont of the honse; and the Defendant ,behind her, who had ap parently been the cause of her rapid exit. . Mr. GAR uow stated that his friend had told the Jury the Defendant had kicked a 'woman in-a' very improper place, but' he had not- condescended to inform them. which was the proper place . to kick a woman. But he wholly denied the kicking; fur if his poor client had been so minded, he was not in a condition to do it, for at that time he had the gout in both his 'feet; and hirniell knew by painful ex-' perience that that was not a time in which a man had a wish , to indulge himself in kicking others. The real fad was, the .Plaintiff came to the Defen-, slant's house reeling drunk, having swallowed a pint of Mr. Belcher's best cordial gin to compose her stomach, overloaded with Wux's entire, and she was so noisy and troublesome that the' Defendatit was forced to put her out of his house, which he did as quietly as possible.. The servant of . the Defendant having proved this statement, on the suggestiOn of the Court, a Juror was withdrawn. Ir. ju3tico GtW z. rfopitplated - the evklence. _ . 'nu : Jury t urned round in the box for about two or three tuinutes, and pionounced the prisoner The Judge. of he Court of Admiralty. then deli vered the.awful sentence.of the la* in 'the most so distitia, and impressive terms. The pri.onet is a tall strong-looking map,. moat 4.5 ; he was rather unwell, and was indulged with a if:ltair; ile was . particularlr agitated whilst the ‘vas pronounciq the sentence ;. and was sup pol ied out of.Conit tiy two men. . Ti, ;:u ..s t otion will tnke place on Thursday morn ' 14, at Execution Dock; - C o urt adjnurned till Tuesday, the 4th of July. • . A Vonipioll Tiall will iv held to lv tlay for thep it , • - pl,e ekr:iLlt, bllengs, (.hanibqr.lain, r~~« . tl 1,11 An r. I_l t 1412 i C 'kin • ILl...tint Rnw.st reef t and Pisblished b% WILLIAM rIitMIGLIt SC ki t i I 5.,1,111 of bullion was not that which ought to be adopted, but at the sAlliZ.l time he nitht leave it to the di,tre fiat) ot the Master to fix upon any . o+het•, v. II ICI I , Upon the . best consideration he should Lilink most proper. EXCISE OFFICE, neratey, lUta 73. .The Commissioners met at an early hour this day, • to he, &fowled and other Carries of Appeal. Tnit'Kttio.u. rox. Ilse defendant, Robert Fox, is a milkman and cow-keeper, of considerable importance, living in Newton-street, Holborn, and was charged upon iii fortntstion wjth being the proprietor of a pliviitu. :611, hicurring.thereby the penalty of 2001. Wise evidence for the Crown proved, that .a still was blown up, ut No. 6, Chnlotte-Ntreetytioonis . bury, an the mouth of January last' s . by t.vlitch.a man, at,.-the Pilule ut Devine, was killed. It was foraer proved, that the person so killed was the sertant Robert Fox,. and that he watt killed in woricith; still, in conlietillellee Qt. his ign ,o,,nce • o i ii s .pw% CIS. For the. /kfendant, :witnesses' were cal led, v,:th a view to invalidate this testimony ; but, in the inirdi Of, the Comanissiontrs, they tailed;; for Litter it out, consideration of the. whole inf the Labds tie •'‘..`" lined in the mitigated penalty of lout. , . . When the case of, Fut was disposed of, t'o' o otherti-were beard, and the - "parties berug cot n ecteJ with the _above -concern, were found Gad;ty, and severally condemned in the toll penalty by, tick , "" viz. in the :utn of ebOl. each. But what_ f el:a:4l4 this matter Of more interest and importance th.iinge ner.ally occurs, was the appear anceof a Gent.letuttnPf the Ppar as a witness. against. them, tiaincb, Serjeant -Clayton,. who was soUptentteci s :by perAtlns conaluding.. ,t ha prosecti6on, ,to glee Iris • testimony. The teamed Serje‘mt did. givc; his. le4lifiktAny ,; and afier fitnilied it, and the cau& WeA akin) end, itddried the Colutni.sioners. It canna • out Trorn his stafetnains, that b.. mg the • lessge of the premises,in question nuaki• the Duke r)1 Bcdford,iliehad let them to.a persop of t ite.n.ttne of Gage, t who represented 11'c - itself to he.a . .West ketiring. ifoin bils : Tog.ltit - in, and . who gage a most ropveable r e fajowe end which rejl rence accorded with his representation ; that he a hera.tore considered hitnse4 as sate. teoapi, and knew no more of the4ubselnent . occurrences- till an in formation was lodged againstliiiiiselLaillle styposed owner of this pr ivate still. . bhe of the three Commissioners presiding repled, thAhri infarmation crime before them ; din 110 im perious duty was imposed upon them ; (kat is, tin Were bound to hear, It, but they thought that i t .). Learned Serjeant Ouglit to be'satisfied ;in the re4G:t, etrecially whets they &titer!, to liiin, th.rr 1114 d;s' missed it, as they thought wif4the,,ir duty, on hetarinz the evidence adduct';a . ; re,;Pet'l fair the Learned Sericiint, bait• that when tliillier? (Ow° before theM CripaCity, ever 1 0 .0 ° i f respeelable the individuals . sVete who %4 they must rake their rate, for they wtre'not 10 . s ',‘ there as respetters of pt rmilis. l aw tt only guide, ant the legi:/,ii . ive• rcgota . iiuns uutzrc which they acted, was their .ILIF!iOFICy. • Tilß Kngt; V. SCoTT...: - This was an nomination Iv r thy: , like offence, posing upon the party ;Inc,: cistinct pell.titles ut each. but on the application of their Cotin , ei, Barry, the hea6ng .was dereired Vv't (ttestii) Several other causes of a minor descirpiioli •er wo disposed of, and the Commissioners appoinca Wcd pestley next tor the detereninaiionof the re4id.llo. On Friday seinliight W I 'tail Croft,. fisherman. 0 1 Cleethorps, was conva. - ted bettiriihe Zvlaynt-01 1-1,.111, in the mitigated penalty 4.503. Tor 11.ivin4 -*Act) tiP an anchor and cabie,in the Humber, and carried ilia same to Grimsby. O'MALY V. WILSON AND ANOTITER. This was an action upon a scieri facial against the . Defendants, who were the.bail of a person of the name of Newell, against whom' ,the Plaintiff had' brought his action, 'but had obtained no fruit from it, lie being . nonsuited upon plea, that he was then resident and domiciled in Fiance, and therefore was to:he deemed as an alien enemy, and could not main tain an aCtion in a Court of Justice. Mr. Patti stated, that the. Plaintiff was a native of Ireland, and, as such, a lit'ge subjeet of the King; he bad resided -a long time in America, and had, gone from thenCe to France; and ,as he was 'in Brance.when the original action was brought for this debt against Mr. Newell, which was, about 14001. it was held that he could not maintain that aCtion ; • he was therefore nonsuited, and, this anion was against the bail, which Mr. Park maintained he' was entitled to pursue y for, this. scieri facias was not issued until after the Plaintiff had arrived in England, and therefore the plea, that he was, now domiciled in France, and an alien enemy, was not true at this timer however it might apply to bitrt at the time of the original action ; nor was the other part of the, pleadings true, which, stated that he was,. and still is, an alien enemy, for ha is now in this country, The ATTOINEY-GENHBAL said;it was unpleasant to-him, upon the presetit occasion, and he hoped it •was, as much so to him as it could be to any . one, to have to state in the presence or, a Gen- . tleman such a defence as he must state to the 24:- Opq, : now : btought by _the. Plaintiff. Bum it was not his decision that' the Plaintiff' should be present at r • the diseumiou i pf Bach a case as this it was mat ter, or ,taste in the ; plaintiff; fur be undeptuud the .. , , ~.~~. Plaintiff to be in Court at, the present moment. •The Plaintiff' was 'a [leaver:if Ireland, as ,such,. a. t st4ect of his Majesty the King of Great tain to whom he owed allegiance of course, and which ellegiaitee be never .could renounce ; but he had chosen -to connect himself with the Rulera of France, and to become a subject of'their Goyern ment, inateed of ours; and'therefore, although no criminal proceeding was instituted against him, yet he could not be allowed - to obtain judgment in a Court of Justice for a sum of money, which mo-' ney, when he shall have, received it, he will carry to Franee, and there employ it, together with all his skill 'and strength, in support of the enemies of this country. That was, the defence to this action, a delence which Was available in the original action againstthe principal, and on 'which the Plaintiff' was nonsuited, and *would . be available now, in the ac tion against the bail, rt .was true that the Plaintiff was now in Court,' and being a British4torn sub jaCt, be owed allegiance to the King of England; but the truth Was, that be was now domiciled in France, and would return to it as soon as this trial Was car , er, and the money paid' upon it. .He leged that this Gentleman had been in' America. for a while, Wentfrom thence to France, Where he: had a' house of trade; had connected himself 'in' l seine. Way' %kith the American Minister in • Paris, Arid was the hearer 'of a message from that iVlinister tai the American Minister in London, which was for the perpoSe of ippearing here, to Support this atat. tire) ; but it iLt was Colourable, And he Was really and Luna jide domiciled in France, and was going thither again as soon' as he shall have received this money, his being here, hands and feet, for the moment, would not answer the purpose, 'for he must be really domiciled here, and not about to return to France; "for it w:is not to be endured in an English Court' of Justice, that' a man .- shbuld obtain a stun of money by its jedgment, for 'the t purpose of being, forthwith, carried to France, to 1 - he . employed to aid and assist the enemies of Great Britain. Gleriny, a Gentleman who acted as Agent'l for the Plaintiff, wa s exa'niincd at considerable 1 length on . the subje& of the Plaintiff's residence' in France; where the Plaintiff had certainly been for manYyeers, and had returned in April last ; but cif I , his 'mention to return to France, this gentleman knew nothing, never having heard him express:any such intention. If appeared further, that this gentleman saw the . Plairitiff In London within 48 ', hours, after the itith of,April, consequently he must i have been in England on the lath of, April, which was the day on which the icierifaciai Issuedin this case,. So . that supposing the . time of issuing the scierifacias to be the time at which the etlion com menced, in construction of law, the Plaintiff would i be entitled to recover, for he certainly hada right to sue when he was in England. t 1 Lord ELLENDb It oUO4 held, that when the Plain tiff came to England, most clearly his allegiance to the King' attached to him as a BrOsh subject ; and, with his dutiea, all his' rights reverted to him . also, and therefore he. could sue for a debt while be remained in this country,, whatever blame might attach to hint, without saying that any blame attached him, or whatever intent i ons he ; „ have gment t . o r T et h u e re m t a e m Pr i in io l i c i e lt ; a a n i d it sv , a i s tru e c n k titl h ed is the plea of alien enemy a nd reside n t in F r ance, Ent L o o ig ris lu l td t ' iip at present, • was, that of "the application of 'svlietherit was to be applied to the commencement of the; action ; if it did, all the rest of the pleading, as it related to his being' alien resident in F r ance at the rime of issuing the stieri facias, or of his being now an alien enemy resident in France, would be surPhisage... However, the. Airy would now find their verdia upon the tads as they appear ed in evidence; thatis, for the. Defendants, upon the plea of the. Plaintiff being resident in France at the commencement of the original attion ; for the riaintiff was certainly in . France at Oataime ; hut . for the- Plaintiff - : .on the other two parts—rnareely, that 'about the Plaintiff being an alien and resident in France at the time of suing out the writ of scieri facias and of' 'his being an alien resident in Prance , now :for he certaiply was here on the .tatli of April last, when that writ issued, and is here now, and as such entitled to thetightaof t Rritish eubje.. The Jury found their verdi& - accordingly.---'the case' is hereafter te,he argued before the court, when tie main question wilt be, " Whether the-plea of alien: enemy resident id France, as applied try the _coma Mcncement 6f the criginal a&ion against the princi pal, governs this case or not • • BULLS COURT, COCKEREL V. BARBEE. A Gentleman in India had,bequeathecl a legacy of 00,000 Sicca . Rupees tp Ji friend in. this cot -atty. It had been referred to the Master to carry the will into execution. But a .doubt arose in- his mind at what rate the Rupee was to be calculated,.though he rather inclined to prefer the rate of the value in but. lion, which would, give 2s. Id. sterling. The Le- . gatee,. however, objeCted to this, insisting upon the rate used in mercantile prittlice, which is two Oil- • Nis and six-pence. , The point was therefore brought before the Court for a decision to guide the Master. Mr. LEACH contended for. tho higher rate, and adopting a suggestion of the Court, put.the caw, that instead of sicca rupees, -the legacy had, been current rupees, a coin merely:nominal, a case in which it would be inipos4ible to apply the rule of bullion, ,to which the Maiter was inclined.' Mr..ALEXANDER, on the other side, felt it easier -to state objections to Mr. Leach's criterion, .than tp suggest ,-any other. It was true, that sicca rupees given-4n India for Bills, on England, , were calculated. at 2s. 6d.. But then it was material to consider, that these Bills weie payable at twelve months' sight ; and taking into account the time spent in the pas. sage home, were pot in general paid till I $ months atter date, The high rate was therefore only a coin-. pensition•for the loss of interest. Mr. LeAcn replied, that , the loss of interest was conneaed not with the rate, bat with the course 'of. exchange. . • . •• The MAsTekof the ROT,Lfldeciiired, that this was a point, which, had it oowb; before him. in the first instance„ he would be inclined to refer to the Mai. ter, having no sufficient 'information, upon which to '• found a, decision, lie rather thought that the rate SHIP NETS. CR AVISIIIA, )irtell 2%. Arrivdci—the from Sinynii; Lions, Ross, front Nteilta 4 HOUglllll4ll. 'Arnold, from Nl.4sarre; Lettcb,•ftota cacti:6; and the Neptune,, Wilkon4.l!•: from Gottenburgh• S..ll2d—the Dildry Finn, - 'range, and Brilows, Torgc, fa Malta ; Arab, •Hariey, for .Gintantar ; GoOd I lope, Too. Aricincl ; attd the Akwa sopltia, Tupper, tor lit:0601404. • . (/8.7//S. • On Sun nay last, at Margate, the railyof IWO E.*tcr id t' l ' Esq. ola Son. • • wi fj tin the sun inst. it Forston-Itotise, fittii/ Atlciove 7, . of Captain Digby, of a Sur,, . . - On the 2.1i1 inst., at Iris bow , . ,Jviatl!)oroigh buO n4sl Bath. the Laity of the Iton. 1,,n0 lit,iwnr, of a Sotl. .tit, A' few 'days ago, at .his beat at iliaootri;s4, in ti le of elate. the Lady. of TtuainasArihuf, (:.,(1. ot a `.o. ._ Latel:, , 'at Rlarket•liiti: Scor; *id', Mr , . 1).o.: d NIG, n "", . petniy, , of a Son and two D4uAnten,, ; , 11 ot whom, tit tit , . mother, arc utoing ivvii. . . , ----- MARPiiti), ... . . On Saturday last, at Ley toi,, l'ilow,as 111.1,-.1:€;. d• I i N.tertliant, of Edinburgh, 4'.4) Stis:irloAh, thir,l dAoi, ll " -r id Xicturd Adams, Ei4i.' of 1.6 w leey•ton, Esbc*. . .on Monday last, 41,14ivei.joiii , A ntht.ny- Littletiale, Eq' Lt! Miss Dawatsit, daui;hter or Vi.tiscy - I)4',N . VW. 1: ' " I . i 1 ._. ~On TuesdaY labt, at Diskant, Mr. lose )n a , rj"',', , „‘ n of ollgowgate-strixt, td Mists iik - (' 11— , 1 1014 11 " . " - Met Page, • 4., , , N li , theitev. Stephen () l aF. ~ ' , . ~ ~ of ti T Ohursday, at t.,olneY Itaich, IVilliain KO, l Abditirch.Line, to Mi s s 1)0;.'w., eldest daughter of 'l' 10 3 Lately, Potvn, Esti. Blair, in 4;aitlioloniesv-lano. - k ii s 4 • the Key,. Edward May, R:!elor tit Belfast , to "i., Siiidair, elites( daughter of the 1,41 C W illiwn iindalio ' '. of Donegal . place. .___,...........--.1.-- DIED. • On WeJoesday List,..suitieniy, Mr. Thomas A tkiosi nt• loritieily of Clirit Church., Sotri:y. • On the fah of, at Neiv-sivil - , L ater 3 ,tort ..Aed 34 yrais, lat.: of In the month , of Oct.iber last, t7'aLitaiii Ilattyt or jesty's atri irarP4u.L'i C"' /4: " ;"' the tollowinit : —Shortly idler the silt p. {atria, ), board of winch CiptAin ry a pAsseoier, rlive `a rite ~t 1 in ti t . Harbout, a Vattliitoy.boar fitinealoot;)iiie, Wily was leaoing ie.qr tht; ty C ryti lit rat %V" the Pl:opie triat a al,rt.l: rope lie gave way ; instantly telt into the river, i;tiovrea Inc atxt the boat, anti s.v.is niiver seen moN• f eSILL pa v. , . , . isnit Stock, 259 t • .. • -,' r.,;_ pr. i• Navy i po leh . 4iittt :r.0. , ‘ 1: S. t.. 1, '-, , : t, : , -* s 3 - :elf Ctni 1797, I I eie , i it tt:t. 4.. • i Irs.s), s ver Cc:it. I 1 per c tail, 17,1, Sqlll 48; 1111::Ctkrcti:c..e.ni::1.,0.18:.,..!...:ct,:t: 1 ..I :: - 1,1;1:,,1.,,e:tii.,.1.1411.i.1.7..c.ir.ti fly t t,f, P i c i . 111(113. SIIACkOII.I,4 ~..., - I L'''''. fur UF.C"L"g' '.9 ii 3 ileT A. ',.., at. Cons., shut - • • ~•.,, 1 1 . , 1. , , , ------------- Y r!• tin SiTtCt, ras v etior. sq•aa re.