The Sun. — London, England, 1810-12-08 00:00:00

LAML. TEPO.',T. COURT OF KING'S Ii4NCH;DEc. 7. THE KING V. KING. • ATTORi4e.Y-GENERAL. stated this to be an (4tn ,nt against Mr. John King, charging .him, lt vt . iiful and corrupt - .lerjUry, ..committed. by " • hr '' ) :!., fied in the - .course. of certain a r, u c'edirigs in the Cott of Chancery, at his suit, Charles Ha„rison. Mr. Harrison had t ` 44 111 , -.d judgment agairit . .Mr. King for 1.501.• in e ..C..urt Of King's Eench, on width Mr.. King hect alli2 in Chancery to 'restrain Mr. Harrison alt) t riher proceedings at law „;. atter a certain Mr. H. having tAled to give, in -.an answer to e 2, , Mr. King obtained an injunction on the a " of April, w-ttich, he served on Harrison ) on the Z t " ; desirous of locking up f whofirrison, ho n'.t convenient:tor him should be abroad with ' l lju 'Ztlrent agarhst him (Mr. K.) to the amount of ; and ng 'aware tt he only way in : 111 6 he' could accomplis h this object, was by -4 'earing that' the w,rit•ol fi, fa. was not issued till after the intithation of thelord Chancellor's ()oder ' °linjunc-tion or restraint from execution, &e. be, the (Bth of the sane month, tiled an ottidasit, t '", ° t to ti.e• best of bis knowledge and - belief, but to e wAolute" faCl, consistent with. his own know— ;Lige. th,i , :ine Writ - otji, fu. in the case alluded to, been sued out alter the gth of April, the date ° f the rintice of the order, although, in fact, the ltrrif had issued on the 4th of that month, before illapplicstiOn.had been made to . the Lord -Chan or.c _ support of this ..case there were, produced the. rder Or the Lord Chancellor for the initandtioit, Order the 6th of April, Copy of Sersme of - that O r der on the gth of A: ril the' Affidavit, of the „"efecidant to , the tertns charged in the indietknent ; 4 t ,"., in . contradiction ..thereto an exatnined. of ~` writ 01 ji..fa. (the original being lodged in .the 7"easury of 411 e Court) with, an indorseMent•beating 41 0 have been issued on the 4th.of April'. Charles Hartison, the - prosecutor .to. the indict "l9nt, also !s'B ore to his having- indo4sed - it on ti'e 4 ,„, 11 1 of Apri), on which day. also` he stet it to the lleriti's (hike • by . a person named George 'Smith son, . . . . Cross-examined by the Common-Serjeant; the . 'vituess stated that he wished the execution tola'ye . been levied 0150 on the 4th of April, tf it could ltaye been done, but it was not,made.till the 1 Itit,• at Which tune the:injunction had issued,' and' had ' lo t been dissblved. G. SmithSdn said the, writ of fija. had been put . int o his hands. by Harrison on the 4th. of April,. to give - an Offices- to get executed.. .He had gnat howe4r; in finding an Officer who would ; e xecute it. He did not leave the writ at the office.; but carried it away uiih him, and I‘e4.trited, it to . H arrison's :Clerk • . Cross-examined by Mr. ALLiY adibitied the Writ of ,fin fa; v'viis tot left at the Sheriff's' Otfice, of course Mr. - King could-bane no iniitrthation' coli terning if if he had applied there. He kneW froM liarrison that aie had not given it: in to at e otfireill 4)e ith of tivril ; ilwretore it was irnii(i'sf t ble. tor 41- 1 1 , nen human being to know till t . had issued. • - Re-e.xdirined by the 11..TTotNEY-,GENpityt k i., the Witness said, the dare of the 4th of Aptii, 7 :,as being the of issuing the writ, %could alsb.appear on . the ba. of the warrant, so that ;any 'Of sa.,st)ing. himsdt on that head, -rnightirain the flu, by consulting either the writ or the war pant. • Air. COMMON SpEJEANT, for the defendant, con- tended, twat •a material averment was wanting in the iodiament , , nainely, that the defendant knew whi.t‘ he had sworn to be Else.- It Was" obviouS, from the evidence of the prosecutor (Harrison) hiTself, that he hat committel a contempt against the authority of the Conti of chancery, in levying on the goods • of the !defendant, after it consisted with the knot,— ledge of Harnson, that an injunction, restraining tint fioli any farther proceedings, had been issued. The detendAnt could not have been ignorant of t his, - and it was an, outrage on common sense to sup pose, that possessed of such liowlertge, and having a well-founded ground Of: complaint against Fjarti son, for winch he was liable to be committed for a contempt, the defendant . Should have selected the is ' suing out of the , writ as the ground of his applicatiOn, Lad ne:not relied en the information he had applied for and obtained, as to the period when.the writ of was issued. One'of , the witnesses, named Anitlison, hadi.sWorn t he' date of the writ of f. fa, - Was indorsed on the. warrant. This he should prove to be fgh.e, from production of the,warrant lie should shew . also, that on application to the offi cer, be stated the 11th to be the date'of issuing the 'writ—a - fad which he wOnld now Cetiity to the Jury 13n oath. The defendant, therefore, wag in bona --Ale , to swear what he had been in fc . irined,and - could „have nuo reason to doubt was :the .tats. leor infor- Ination-hecoAd.tiotgo to the persecutor of the sentindietment; his declared eneihy, and who hav 7 king a • writ Against Irina for 15071. which. he had kept in..biz pock: -t tram the 4th of April, could not f ire supposed well disposed to prevent Nina from fall k'itg ilito error. . At the 'office they naturally would not shew the writs there lodged, to persons whose °toy objett might be to disappoint - their operation. ..In making the affidavit in question, therefore, the clelendant might have done so falsrly,ibut he gut), • iniitcd, not wilfully, maliciously, orcorruptly. The • pTobability.of the case, too was altogether in favour of the defendant, it being hardly to be 'credited that Mr. Harrison should have kept his 'in his pocket from the 4th to the itth of April, giving . every other creditor of t he defendant an opportunity, during the whole of this period, to disappoint his . execution.. -Mr: - Cater, from the Sheriffs' Office, produced 'the warrant, dated I ith A l .ril, iri which there' was tto mention by :indorsement, or otherwise, of the .irate of the 4th of that month. ' . James Hemp, the officer, stated, that Mr.::King lied made applic:anon io him, both personally and .4y a . -boy, desiring to know the date of the writ ..of.fi. fn. which .he had stated, as he believed. it 20 be, the t Ith of April, _there .heing .fieldoin af: i y time allowed to lie ovvr in the execution.of.sneh writs: The - ATTOItNEY' 7 QENeII AL wag heard in reply, Lord'ELLENBottoOGH, alter recapitulating the evi- • dence, observed * that some thingSin'the gaewgre dear. It was dear from • the indorgetnent on the writ Of fa. fa. itself, in the hand-writing prMr. Har rison, and also from the oath of. Harrisn4, given in Court to-day, that the wt it had issued-On tiie 4th of April. It was equally clear trom.dhe i atlidavit of the defendant . , that he 10:1. sworn that it did not issue till a period' long, subsequent, tamely, after the 97h of the same month: The affidavit af. the defendant, therefore, was incontestibly fake. licit it was contended for - him, that there were circum , stances in the case, which shewed, that lie 'had made every proper inquiry, and had been misled.— He had inquired himself personally, trlct had also , ent a boy to tiroeure information as to' the dale td the isstiin g . of the writ. , was„ curiOus that he. w should have appli e d to th e - ar rant fors he. informa tion he wanted. The question, however,' for the consideraion of the :Jury whs, if he had beende- Ceived by this information; or if he. hall contrived ) the inferMation to warrant the applii4tion he meant to mike to Chancery, 01111 to he in store •for after Wards. It the July believed, that afer all due and: proper means of information had been resoited to by clic defendant, he had fillet; into .error, tie was entitled to.a verclicit r.rf. acquittal. But• if' they . . were smisfied tha n he knew', or had means of know ing the ;fad, and wil:ully shut This eyes against it, in that ease Critninally responsible and was .guilty of •perjury. • The jury, alter Sopieltesitatiotr, found the de fendant Guilty: COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DEc. 7. PRICE V. GYNN. This Was . an action brought to 'recover 41 shil lings, the amOtint• ofan Apothecary's Bill for medi .cine4.;-to'ctirethe,a,-((q,iapr, a ~ark7 b u! c h,er's, treat ).vaN - conlend“l on the: part . .of the claw , the'eharLe's cyvere unfair, and that they 'had been l aiseu to . 4 . 1 sliflings,, m,tely to afirod an op ' port bein g ing .an action in the' SupetiUr Co IS. skitt•had been tubbe4 of rise we: 1)1f/ the shbe, ilrotigh it IV3s insittifated;buf:not. support ed •by The evlderice, 'that th,re Lad been some ap pearance' of morrifictition. .Among the 'charges for the . cure of. ~ t he roe there w 4, ere some for openin ; ..; dr4nghts.% - __The de.feirdant's dluihter ham pent.d. to cut hor !kiwi• for the ,finger charged I , mo Shillings; while - an .- opening draught bad also been administered to her. In addit ton' to the ch;,rge for nikteities, there was alsa one. o t -nue pound tor attenaance:,, , Tl . , defendant had pajd. for the wItol: 11: I Os. bUt the plainfilf.had aceepftd, this only in part, and britught tris'acttonfor theresr: Itlr. Serieant, Sitts:P,ll Eitb, after ad% king the Jory; in ca , e they happened•l Q cut their fing,4s, to .take care of` cieir.bowels, skalled some apothecaries to pro'Ve the unre-asoitabletwss of the eh :rges. r : rhu‘ze concurred in.the'oi,iniou, that there I , lll(..thiog unrrasonaHe is tie bill, att.hongli Mr. I) unison,. ass 2pothec;try Alanches ter-squu7e, said ttrai iffelr charges vat ied according to the rank in life of the patient,, lie would cer lain'y have cha'rged his: Lordship, the Judgt l ; 111610 than he a portt-410t,1,er. Being en,i:i-eXit pf oq by Mr. Se.. - jatit VALcinAtg, he . admitt v :Itaf CASt.', 4I;(3 ii $ Ini.s.sed,ji4e, he, ''would hat egone to Nvork*lr.fly, and given ano'i her., If there had 1.1-en,a ‘ gatigt,eue k he,Would have gii en •a 41 - aught every tto The Judge. was of opinion .714fgt.-the charge al!o -gether was too ligh. It wifi tutt,the piactlre of an apothecitry. to ch,srge for, attendance, ,though . something. was generally given,. at the option of the' patient, where there, was' any extraordinary trouble. , . . .1.111r4 Seijeallt VAUGIIAN Chose to be mon-suited rather thatt have a verdict for 'llin for lessib.;ri 465: - which would have subjected t. e p!aintitf to th'itabH or 'treble costs, for havhig stied in the super:dr' Court, in a case which might have been dispoiect of by the Court of Consciende. The Plaintiff was accordingly non-tuited. CONSIS I'o RY COURT OF' DOCTORS' COMMONS COX - V. GOODDAY. ThiS was a Tiestion as to tlie•admissibility of cti -minal articl s .exhibited by Miss H. C. of Essex; as the Reverend William G. vicar ol her pa- - rish, for brawling in the church. The prosecution was - founded upon the Statute of ' Edward VI. and the complaint contained in the ar . tides was, that Mr. G. M the midst of his Church service, :without, any cause, addressed Miss C. stat mg, that he had observed the most indecent beha viour in her at Church tor some tithe; that if she continued 'it he would order the Sexton, to turn her out ; and it that would n o t do, he would put her in the Spiritual Court ; upon which Miis C. much :hurt 'at.tiirding'this rebuke, though undeserved, had drawn upon her the .eyes of the congregation, "re -tired with her sister; and - as they Were leaving the 'Church, Mr. G. exclaitned, " Let them go to the play-house, and act their acts there." It was contended by the. Counsel for the Riev. Gentleman, 'that the words: were only those of. dig nified repioof, which he was justified in using to ' wards - any person interrupting- the solemn observ anee.of,Teligious duties ; that as they bore this con struction, evidence could be .adduced of their having been uttered with - any other view, and that, therefore, it woad not - only be irrelevant to admit the articles 'to proof, but • would be establishing a dangerous precedent, to prevent Clergymen from • preserving decorum in the performance of religious duties. -, Miss C.'s Counsel put a'totilly, different 'construe, lion upon the words, and contended, that if nothing but a reproof was intended, it was not necessary to add, the ex pressionsas they were leaving the. Church, .of, f'. Let chew go, to :a play-house; and act their acts . there 'and .to include Miss C.'s sister, who was 1.1 o,ffc dal g pariy, , in .them ; and the insi nuation conveyed- iii them, alit the circumstance .of Miss C. having that morning received. the Sacra meat from,the hands of the- Reverend Gentleman himself, must strongly repel the presumption of his having considered her condud such as to merit his reproof, and that .therefore the woids apptared to have been uttered solely for the gratification of pri tate trali,m—a feeling unworthy of the" sacred cha. ratter lb which the Reverend Gentleman was 'then officiating. .7. • The Learned Judge; Sir WILLIAM SCOTT, con curred in this constru&ion of the words,. and t hrre- Ore admitted the articles ; at the same time,pbserv tharoe Reverend Gentleman would be thereby b, rt,r l eaabled, if he thought *proper, to 'repel by, ciid,.-nee of Miss C.'s the. preshinption of hiS r•tottat'.ng . a6ted from the unworthy motives, ascribed to hitt). • • . The following account of' a most' mysterious af fair which 'lately , happened in' Ireland is extraactl from an Irish Paper::---. The distressing and delicate subject to which we have already adverted, and 'upon which we are now again about to enter, is the violent and sudden death (tie are at present on wiling to say murder) of a most respectable . gendewoman in the town of Eyrecourt. It appeirs that Mrs. Montgomery, one of the sisters of Giles Eyre, Esq. a gentleman of considerable consequence,wlynkaS - been, upon more Occasions than one, a Candidate'for the Parliamen tary represelitatTioti,ol 11OS CP0011; and who,is, at this moment, a Lieutemint:-.Colonel in the county of Gilwav Militia, was fo'nn(l dead in her own house on the night •of the 3th insr. "The Messrs. Eyre (her brOthers) either suspeel ing, or perfet9ly s,itisfe f 'in their mind, that she lbad'been murdered by Mr. Montgomery; her,own husband, caused him to be cd,;tfined to hii house, in which the melancholy catastrophe- had occurred. The maid-serwanti of the house, three in nornlmr, they also caused to . he apprehended and confined in Bridewell, for the purpos of compelling them to . . discover the manner. •in which their -mistress had come by /her dcatb, as she had , dined a very short time previous to .Fier:-decease - app rently aR goid health - As she had ever enioyl 1. A Coroner's watt holden oti the Lbdy On si:e morning of the 14th (the, day after her death), when the Jury, having - dejibc.Tated during the entlre.s that day ; tf Stidc)en the objea-uf the Ittry, in finding this: si.ngplif ind ex traordinary verdich : was' to.'eictripate...M4-. Mont. tomery from the odious imputations ,onder'whiCh ritiat; unt'oftunate Gentleman . laboufed;,. O 'b jeb wipt 7not acc(troplishei—nii -liberation -did not, ,The brothers of deceased - tad pr 6:. cured and. brought -forward clearer: ind'lifore conclualve' evidence against the accused,- than that ' which they had. - pretii.ot-dy •subinitted to the Jury, find had Win coritinued. in custody until The fol lowing Sat , :rday (the •,on which day he wai to have been trans-a:int:a to'• this . io,Wn under a strong ruilkary escort, to .be contined.•in -.the County for the purpose'Of abiding his trial, for the 111;04ed inurder but, at Cleecn o'clock on the ins rni:•g• of the . last _mentioned day, the pri son,:r,.(litcted‘ his escape, and though inthiediate and diligent search - Thad been Made; he' has not been discovered. Jr is said that - a .Very young child, of both patties,: was the only witness to rhis melancholy tragedy ; and this chill, we under stand, s‘fvs, that th& tkoth of ; .irs. Monte,o!Tiery,, who %;r:ts - far advanced in ,pregnat;oy, y. , t-isoccasioned by a kick iti the slow : , :hvinsich tshe received. froth _net; hushind, in Oonscquence of trifling alter cation'caused by a ditnte!ice of opinion upon some itutilaterial subject of a domestic nantre. We hav•e• aisolearned chat Mr. Montgomery.. acknowledges that he was trrtit!ea to give she kick ; but adds, that it „happerre , d on the •tiorning of , the nigh; 01) which the lady died, and troM tipence infers that it did rib(' cause her de.4th ; and hi 'a idte(which he Wrote'andf lett t ehind him, we under - stand he inti mates his:intentiOn df coming for.sard in due time to . ab de trial."---(Galway Chronicle) INDIA,,-A letter from Berampore, dated May 22,, sa!, s,—" the,nnly news . 1 have to cotnmuni cate toyon - k an extraordinary event that took place here a ti.w days ago. The water in. our tank,which I have. -known these 34 years, changed suddenly to the - colour of dark green, and an immense quantity uf fish,: inany of them weighing from 10 to 18 seers, floated 'dead on the surface of it. Some few were token ont by the natives and carried away ; the remainder wee transpored by haekry loads anti buried, or applied • to the purose of manure.. This strange occurrence is attributed by most people - 10 the recent earthquake, which I understand was felt at Calcutta." In the late seizure at Harwich, by Mr. Lovt DAY, Of fOrty , tout. bars ,of gold, it is remarkable that cich bar should be secreted in a large schenie of the new plan:of drawing the State Lottery in oneday, on the 15th ot, February next, containing exaetly 'the same numbir of capital prizes. - In rebuilding the town of .Schwaitz, which was burnt during the late will between F'r'ance and Aus tria, there were found in the vaults if the Cathedral the bodies of 300 persims, who,. in .peeking refuge from the flJoles and the sword, bad been entenntied alive, tosuffcr the moSt Clreadlui - of all ideath,thiji •of hunger. Some of those unfoitunate victims had, by the most. dreadful expedients, *Protracted Their 'miserable existence 14 days and nights. '. Box ERs.-The great batik betwixt Crib and Mo the•American Black, or, which the whole of spurting attention is deVoted, will take place Qll ' Wednesday senniglit, about 30 miles from Loudon. The pugilists have .been :severilotteks in trai n in g , Crib in Kent, and Molineaux in Ifertfoidshire.=— Crib has been tedutod a stogie. , A person at t,anternury nas now a hog in his pos session .which weighs 85 shm' and which is only months old. This,anirual must, of eaurge, hays gamed, on an average, five stone. per month, with the exception only of his weight when farrowed. There is now a swan in Felbridge-water, near East GehiStead, which. has been an inhabitaht.there .for upwards of seventy years. . This - old bird is in full pluinage, and apparently in high health, A swan ofextraordinary size, measuring seven feet between the extremity of its wings, was shot a7few days ago, by . Mr. J. XPlLiina, weigh=masicr of Cushenall, on the - estate and near the4e4lesne of W. RICHARDSON, Esq. of that place. MR. GRENVILLE'S SPEECH, ON THE REGENCY QUESTION; • iN ride. tContinued from Yesterday.] I x ish to r:-cal the atte Committetir to the principle wine], I Givealready that it is an essential at,d indisPeos.'ole part i our duty in the present circtunsiancol, at th, sain:• time we establish a tu'm of Goverianted capable of - con sluOing the ,pubia.i.linsi - less 'with 5.-..,ergy and effiet, to 'f) l'ovide a comOete and ample ewe toy - ter abling his Majesty, whenever it shall please God fe, restore him to his health,' to re-a•sume the eXercise of his. ainhortly, fully, freefy, and without ems barraSsmeot. Our atic.slo:s hate acted oil the ground of a similar diny in the curse of every Re gency which has hitherto existed in this country, as far as we can trace them with any degree of ac curacy, either in the records of Parliarnent, or in • trie annals of our history . Pe r , if w e:' except the two Instances of R:chard the Third, and of the Pro . - tedor Somerset (which are"Soch such eVident'usnr patioes that no se - e,s can laid upon them) it wilt be found, that during the course of Many centuries; no subject in these realm:, hoWever eearly allied td the person of the King, has been permitted in any .case of infancy, or disability, to exercise the whole prerogative and authority of the Crown. The mode of restriction has, indeed, for the most part, he,en different front that which is now proposed ; hut tlel principle has been the same ; that in the estebiiiii. ment of a Regency, it is necessary not to loel; ex- • elusively to the • strength and efficacy of the iette.._ mediate and temporary government, but to c ( , tisalt at. the sans - time, the pertna:,eut interest and ~ : cuti+ ty of the Kieg;. in whose name, and on whose be half, the authority so given is intended to be exere. eked. There'.is no thstioetion on which it can be argued, 'that this principle, - which has been - ,forunly adopted in the case of the minority of the Sovereign, is less applicable to the circumstauces under which we are now placed. 'Perhaps it would not be difficult io assign some reasous fur thi n ki ng t h a t 'applies with m u ch greater force to the preseht case; and that in the consideration of the measures now to be adopted, it might with propriety be 'car ried a great dell farther than in any former instance. But without entering itrio this, which might lead to an unnecessary discussion, it -i. sufficient to have estnb:iibed, that the principle of limiting. the power Of a Regency, with a view to me future secngiiy of • the Sovereign; has been felt and titled upon in every .case 'which has hitherto occurred, and is almost eo•eval with the Constitution of the Monarchy it- : • 1 . - ~ • have already admitted, that the mode in which ••this has, been done, has usually been ditfereutfroin that which is now proposed. The whole powers of the Crown have,Aur the Most par:, been c:tllei into action, although I believtt it irpO t . be.sh.. • w it • that this has not always been the case but they. have riot been given to any one subject ; they hay.: been divided L among a variety of p , rsons, differing , in rank, Lituation, acid de,cription, and wh(, - -.e jar ring interests have. been thought to afford the n.st - security, thin they would not Concur in 'fil:Asl.ll7Yi - prejudiCiA,l6,the tilithority of t:ie Sover...ign. And With sped to this point,. which relates not to vane principle, but to the manner of limitation, 'it 1.3-1-, tainiy becomes our duty t o proceed with a snore than ordinary degree of deltberation, caution, and doubt, when we are desired to depart from the au thority, not only of a remote antiquity, even„or ' recent precedet4, estanlished by persons . erni for their integrity and -.4isdoin, For toy t. nowever, tnough , srisitiog to. .peak 'with a;i fir. re spect which owe to thoseprecedenti, I cannot: . but say, that I have, very serious do , :btS . whetlir'r the . two last Regency Bills were well adapted to ; cumstances of the times in which tliev pai%ed. But this,. at least, I may assert with great.. r !ence, because I know I aru„supported in it by the opinion of this House, and of the cooDi! in the present case, the establisittnent of • ;ch a form as is there provided, would have, bee:.} i.roduc'=- tive of infinite mischief, without beingcumpensA ed by any one real advantage. • We are, I believe, ail agreed, that the govern-. anent of these kingdoms - should, during this unhappy • interval ) be committed to the administration of one • person, Prid that it is extremely desirable that this •person should be his Royal Highness the P,ince of Wales. But if, by general consent, we r depart in this respect, from Ahv prat ice of our ancesto:s; it surely cannot be reasonable to•argue, that we are,. therefore ) boUnd to adhere to kin another point so intimately connected with the former. . It cannot be a just conclusion to say, that beCauSe they committed the whole au hority of a King into the Bands of a Regent, controlled and fettered by a fixed and permanent council, .it is proper for us to delegate the same power to-a single person, Un restrained by any similar check. It 'seen:F. 'on the contrary, that the more widely we depart from. one. line of limitation and •iestraint, the more we are b9und to look to,some other mode- of carrying the same niapose into effed ; unless, indeed, w...! as.ukeless Ni improper, the whole principle of pro-. viding a „security for the rights which are :ier..-kiftec to be exercised by the Sovereign himself, in the happy event of his recovery. 'Those who hold that principle to'be founded both in sviedorn and in justice, m ust M a k e t h eir opt ,ol between the two propositions of a Regent controll ed in'the exercise, or limited in the extent of authority. Of these I have no doubt in s Oen the latter is infinitely more agree - able to the, irne spirit of the British constitution. That whatever degree of political authority is fit, uncl,.r a,ty given eticunistatices, to be exercised for tilt:. executive government should be exerciied by a person ; and that wherever.. any just groo,.d clanger' is found to exist, it.should be gottraeL! rloirtst, it posible, by limiting the extern of tire po .er p,o 'exercised, rather than by dividing_ amongst in ,cy what ; cannot with ,propriety be entrtisid ihe; : piinciple on wbich `to.:i pro ceeded at different eeriods, to diminish the I,,if,en,a of the Crown itself; not holding it necvs g e nera l propositiqn, that the same cirgri-e • f or itilltienee should at all titut s'belong to , he governments but thinking it their duty-to con. -:, and regutate.this point accorditi to t.;t: tJ'