The Sun. — London, England, 1810-07-18 00:00:00

—. one, alike conscientiously, though very mercifialfy, , ---- • . performed .what they consid e r e d t o b e t h e i rs . -.....,_ In the Aindu6t of the trial, some special circtim , EXTREME CRUELTY. , Yesterday; _Maly Wolfe, alias Boyce, a y'oune esseinrin of very ,decent appearance, was charge'! . . with being guilty of extreme cruelty towards her Ijuaeira, JULY I 4.—Ye,;erdiy pursuant to notice_ aGi , . Lic-ral• \le •i ' , . L e• 1, of the Catholics of: Ireland foci;` the •. , 1 place at theFarnsitig Repository, in Stephen's-green, eaten Doctor Sheridan was called to the Chair.— stances had occurred. An attempt was made, on part o the prosecution, to prove, .that (in the idiom of duellists) this duel bad not been a fair one; or, in the purer language of morality, that the de- Mr. Ha ) , the Secretary, read the resolutions of the own child, a girl of about five years of age. ceased had' died by assassination. I felt, and most last Gen rat assembly, and upon the motion of - Dr. . . • Air. ItuNNINoToN, on the part of the prosecutor, 1 &sit:idly stated to the Jury, that in the• legal crimi )roingoole, Mr. O'Gorman proceeded .to report the stated, that the cffence for which the prisoner stood uglify of the prisoner, this made no difference what measeres which had heen adopted bytheConimittee, indiaed was one, that, for the honour Of human ever. But as the prosecutors seemed to me to hwe a ••d ended by proposing resolutions, tending to pledge nature, be Was happy to say seldom occurred : it • -failed, - utterly in their endeavour to establish this Un tie Cetholic body to a continued system of peti was a charge against a mother of cruelty to her own t • ' fairness, I considered Myself as bound, in reeapi t ulna nutting .Parliament for redress of grievances. The The evidence he bid to ,induce was of a ing the evidence to observe upon the failure; the motion was op used by Mr. Keogh, and an animat- more .• e ' nettne so shocking, according to his instructions, '` . re especially because, otherwise, a verdia of con ed debate toela place in consequence, during which thai he could scarcely credirt hem, nor could fie pre- vier ion ostensibly required on one groundaanight, in Messrs. O'Cotmor, Clinch, and O'Connel, spoke veil' en himself ( to state them, He would therefore with considerable effeet. The question o f adjourn me call his witnesse s , f rom w h om t h e J ur y would hearanother ; ; and a finding whi c h, i n f orm , an d as i t m mild the 2d of November was a t l eng th- pro the case. , posed and carried, by which time r the - opinions of were by accident, was agreeably to law, might beate The first witness called wee Susannah Brunton, -. been, by a strange fatality, a verdia in some degree ; Cathoiics of the several counties may be aster- , who stated that the defendant lodged in her lit)llSe t f ' e the same time. M ' ob- ret ae-iiiist evidence , at - ell' and the propriety of petit ;oiling determined upon. upwards of seventeen months, during which time ti'dni on this failure, 1 however accompanied (as I In_ time interim, the former Commit tee aro to coatinue she had daily w itnessed her cruelty towards the un- their usu a l f unct i ons. make it a rule to d o ) with a notificauen to the .furve fortunate child.. She p ar ti cu l ar ly recollected one in- that I was here stating my impression as to matters stance : the defendant lodged indite parlours of the , • —........,........... of mere fad ; and that, as to every thing of that de witness's house, and the ‘ witness being one day em- a • . 1 D UEL LING. sceiption, though they were entitled to time aid (Amy eloyad in the k;tchen underneath, was alarmed by remarks, yet they were not to treat these with the • ought py to toy direetioes several heavy knocks upon the floor above, the last The following is a 'copy of a letter written some deference which they to il bi W I i2jl broeglit down part of the cieline, and the time sitter, from time Hon. Judge Sir William Smith, in point of law ; but were to give to them neither Wittiest; though: she heard h succeeded by a t ' sort of a . to Sir Samuel Ron - tiny. It met iforn-this latter Gen- more nor less attentioe, than the observations might smothered en an. She immediately ran up to the 'appear to their own understandings to deserve.—ln e. tleman with that candid and liberal treatment - and reamer's apartments and inquired what she had been , intimating that they were bound to find the prisoner reception which might have been expected from his doing, tA ho answered, she had been doing nothing. charader ; and in his." Observations on the Crimi- guilty I also enumerated cases in which they would The witness, however, on lookicg at The child, was ,- seem ;ri be under a similar, an equal, and an irksome nal Laws of' England," the passage adverted to be-eatremely shocked to perceive its countenance dis - obligation. I, for example, told thent— • ~ • • totted, .and its eye swell e d ver y muc h, an d a ga i n in- lo w ha d bee n omitted. (mired of a t e - pri so ne r w h at she had b een d o i n g ; Dublin, Feb. 14, aro. -"If a parent be insulted, or even struck, in th e presence of his son, and this l a t ter d estroy t h e ag - Sir, I shall tak e ti me lib erty o f enter i ng upon my the prisoner ac k now l e d ge d s h e h a d b een lif t i ng the gressor in a duel, fought betw een t h em b y delibe subjed, (which I trust w ill i nvo l ve an d p l ead my ex ontineunate infant up by its neck, and proceeded to rate and regular appointment, th e t ransac ti on will be Fuse for this - intrusion) wh en I h ave p rem i sed my siiew the witness in wh a t manner , t ill t h e c hild murder.—lt an officer, at the head of his re g i ment , just reveal for you; and n s y c or di a l a r i d h a bi tua l again becam e bl ac k i n t h e f ace . Th e w i tness re- . be called a coward; and in c onsequence o f t hi s, deli reverence for the privileges of Parliament ; and con monstrated with the prisoner on her d - condu, which berately challenge, and kill the Offender. in a dud, sequent ly of th a t i n t egra l pact o f . i t, t h e House of , she told her would sooner or l ater term i nate f atal l y 'Commoes. I n d ee d i t i s , i n no sma l l d egree, by ,fi he is, a murderer by law.-11 a husband fi n d his to herself and th e child t oo; t h e c hild w a s frequent- . these sentiments of d ue res p e a , an d b y abese prin- wife in the embraces of another, and kill him, un • ly sent - to seheol witho u t h av i ng any thing timing errned and unresi s ting, on ti me s p o t, t hi s i s man ciples of constitutio na l venerat i on, th at I am iuduc given to it to eat, and on , th ose and office occasions slaughter of the 'rawest and most venial kind ; b ut ed to giv e yo u th e t rou bl e o f t hi s ad d ress. In a • the witness used to 'feed it. if, .giving the adulterer further time for preparation, Daily Paper of. the t Oth of the present month which . , • Mary Lechard said, time prisoner lodged veith a has lust reached me, I fi n d t h e fell ow i ng passage fairer chance f o r life, lie p u t s arms i n hi s h an d s, her -atom Novemb e r l as t, t ill t he t i me shed was - and meeting him. by appointment, happe ns to k i ll to occur, in wh a t p ro f esses to b e the report - of an apprehended in May. Sh e h a d s e en many i nstances : et e anton cruelty on the part o f t hi s unnatura l pa - him in a duel, the offen ce , a lt er i ng i ts c ha ra c ter, eloquent and h umane speec h o f yo u rs rent toward s ' he r u n f ortunate i n f ant; a ce i n parti " The Hon. and Learned Gentleman stated an - • -becomes deliberate, and is aggrava t e d to a .murderai . Whether. the above observations w e re f a vo ura bl e other case, 'of a duellist, who was acquitted in . con-cular, in January last, du r i ng a very severe f rost, the to the,prisoner, might be fairly Made a question ; f or sequence of tim e di re cti on o f a L earne d J u d ge; and ; witness was disturb e d ea r ly une morn i ng b y a no i se if each of the enumerated ca ses was a mur d er, i t ' t in the yard, and o n l oo ki ng o ut o f t h e w i n d ow, per- also that of an offi c e r , w h o , see i ng t he- case report- - might be asked, was not the homicide comm i tte d b y e i ceived the prisoner plun g i ng t h e c hild i nto a large d in the Paper, an d h av i ng h a d t h e mis f ortune to !mini, r 1 fortiori, one ? The obje&, h owever , o f my kill a brother officer in a duel, conceiv e d th a t h e mig h t i stone cistern, and ev e ry ti me s h e t oo k t h e c hild our 1 enumeration, was equally warranted' and ob v i o ias.. expect an acquit t al. H e went over to I relan d, sur- its back rubbed aaainsteh e s id e o f t h e cistern, by•t which the fl e sh wa s la cera t e d. U pon t h e witn e ss rendered himself for tr i a l, was tr i e d , f oun d gu il ty of llt involved a caution to the Jury, agai ns t re f err i ng calling to h e r, t he pri soner d es i ste d . Th e witness murder, and his M a j est y' s Mi n i sters t h oug h t t h em .. I to their own ideas of comparative mor a l gu il t ; or - , selves justified in o rd er i ng hi m to b e executed ; and founding on any special criminality of the p r i soner a. .soain after went up to th e p r i soner ' s apartment to see executed he was accordingly. He.mentioned these conviaion which ) on the contrary, if had at all,ought how the child was, a nd di scovere d i t i n a most dread to be soundly bottomed in th ose a t r ia principles of cases to shew th e necess i t y of a p port i on i ng a de ful condition. Sh e p erce i ve d severa l mar k s of blood oe fi time floor of the room, w hi c h she conjectured nitive punish men t f or cr i mes, an d not leaving it '' law, which .would e qu a lly demand (and justify) a l - . - in time breast of any Judge to cry into effea, or ; findieg guilty, in the cases of the officer, the hus proceeded from - a large wound in time child's head; I band, and the child.—But suppose the abo.ve eau - - remit the punishment inflieted by law." the skin also was rubbed from its arms, and both Sir, beg to protest against b e i ng su pp ose d to ' meration and it:marks to have siaas of tliz. face were muc h b ru i se d , as if b y b lows I . been eminently fa- assert what I cann o t k now , v i z . t h at the words 1 vourabie to time case of the prisoner at the bar, will -1 roni some hard su b s t ance . Si te h a d somet i mes seen given in the Ne ws p a p er are truly ascribed to you.— any lawyer venture to deny that every position in the Prison e r, wh en t h e c hild was at wor k , str i ke her I the above extrad f r om my c h arge i s un d ou b te d l aw ? Secondly, I cannot with c er t a i nly a ffi rm t h at who ao hi to force the needle a consid era bl e d ept h i nto leer fingers. 1 .4 ever uttered those expr ess i ons , w h ere v er h e may Will any man (professional o r no t pr o fe ss i ona l) , a l- The Beadle of the pari s h o f St:B o t o lph d escr ib ed have used them, - ( i f ever t h ey were spoken); ad- 4 lege, that a Crown Judge b oun d t o rem e m b er mercy, in administering ju s tice, is to re f ra i n f rom vetted to me,. o r to any tr i a l h a d b e f ore me ; a n d the situation in which the child was, when deserted thirdly, and 'especially, even if I were to a d m i t the • stating 'what is unquestionably law, because the by its mother-in May last. suppOsition th a t th e y were spo k en b y you, S i r, I 1 , statement may have a fav o u r abl e o p era ti on on t h e INlr.'Hurlock,,a Surgeon, w h o was sent f or to the yet would no t b e u nd erstoo d to complain 'of them, child by the last witn e ss, sta ted, t h at Wh en he saw prisoner's case ? 'And was I not th e mor e called on to seek out every legal observation, in aid of one , or - to risk violating, h owever i n di re c t l y, t h e respect the child immediately after the p r i soner d e a erte d i t, due to the House of Commons, much less to haz ar d whose crime it bad been endeavoured, without suc hwas exceedingly em ac i a t e d, there were s ev e ra l cess, to distinguish from the, alas ! too ordinary case the infringing th ose va l u abl e an d i n h erent pr i vil e ges, :narks of violence per ce p t ibl e on diff erent parts of of 'homicide, in a duel, in rd to enhance the tur which form part of - that Constitution,' on which any its body, and r one of its toes - - appeared to - have been pitude of his Offence, and induce - the Jury (confound. own best rights and liberties, depend. In whatever ' crushed to pieces : it was altogether the most deplor ing moral with legal culpability), to ground their I may write* then; I beg distinctly to, be understood able obje& he had ever seen. verdict not on the guilt which was ascertained, but —as treatinganot of any thing that may be said in . The prisoner in het defence denied having been on an alleged aggravatiqu, which had not be e n pr e y - Parliament, but m ere ly o f a paragraph which has guilty of any acts of cruelty towards th e c hild. Sh e ed ? How l jealously solicitous' even in ci v il cases , appeared in the p u bli c p r i nts . A ga i n, I venture to declared she had n o t d eser t e d h er , but. lost her, and , Courts of Justice are, that every yerdiat shall stand surmise that time para gra ph i n quest i on may h ave had used every means in her p ower t o di scover w h ere o applied to me ; beca use a p erson o f t h e n a me of on a legitimate foundation, appears from th e pratt i ce she was with ou t eff ec t, an d at t h e t i me s h e was taken of granting a new trial, wherever' inadmissible evi ---, charged with murder, committed in a duel, into custody, she was going to a printer-to have some - dence has been received ; even though, independent was acquitted before me at --,in the springof the - bills printed, offering a reward, to discover where she ly of such illegal proof, abundant m atter to j ust i fy year —; and - a p erson w h o h a d kill e d a b rother was. The Jury without hesitati on f oun d h er gu il ty . the verdict may be found. On what p r i nc ipl e d oes officer in a duel, afterwards " came over to Ireland ; The Chairman, in pron o u nc i ng sen t enc e observ- -. thiS usage rest ? On this ; that- though the verdict surrendered himself t o j ust i ce; an d b e i ng tr i e d f or ed, that it was 'impossible f or wor d s to co n vey an ' the offence, wa s convicted add executed ____...,, seem conforanable to justice, non censt a t t hat •. i e h as adequate idea of the abhorren ce i n w hi c h t h e offence - not been by accident that it is so :esanon,cteqatahat Assuming therefor e th a t I am t he J u d ge, b e f ore of the prisoner mu s t be h e ld by every one w hO h a d the Jury did not build it on that p ar t o f -The evidence, whom that verdict of acqu i tta l was h a d , w hi c h the beard time evidence; the Court h a d only, to regret - which ought not to have been re ce iv e d. But thauga, ' Newspaper repr e sents t o h ave b een g i ven un d er my it. was not in its power to inflict a p un i s h m e nt a d e - ' in the case of —, no such speci a l c i rcums t ance as direction, I proceed distinctly to state, for your in qiiate to the offence of whi c h s h e h a d b een found - I have mentioned had existed to j ust ify the line of, formation, that th e Edi tor o f t h at paper h as errone guilty. That the pillory sh ou ld f orm part o f h er - charge which I have described, still I h o ld, t h at so ' punishment the Court -felt would be b u t d o i ng he r onsly fallen into a st rong m i srepresentat i on o f what ' long as a Juite repeats the evid ence f ait hf u ll y, , an d occurred before m e . Wh en h e sta t e d t h at "a ' justice, but they were fearful, of infliaing it, lest states the law correctly, if it be not his bounden duellist was acquitted, i n c onsequence o f t h e direc the civil power should not be a bl e to h o ld t h e per duty, it is anleast his undonbted ,right, to make in Lion of a Learned J u d ge ," I cannot conce i ve hi m to palace in awe, and s he s h ou ld f a ll a v idi ro to the . favour of the prisoner (especi a lly i n filvorem vitce) have meant any thing but t hi s : — e i t h er t h at th e just indignation elicited by suc h cr i mes as h er ' s. every lenient observation, which, com p at ibl y w i t h Judge charged that thee offence was not a m i n d er ; . Under these circumstan c es, th ere f ore , t h e sentence such true recapitulation and s o un d s t atement , or else, that he told' time Jury that the w i t nesses were - of the Court was, that s h e s h ou ld b e i mpr i soned in ' he can recblleet _and urge, as ari s ing ft om , or not. to be believed.--It either was his me an i ng; h e the House 91 Correetion for tw o y ears , an d at t h e fairly bearing on the ca se .—B ut t o recur to has, (uni n ten t i ona lly I ion persua d e d ), misrepre- expiretion. of that .time find securiti es. f ur her good I my Original assertion; viz. th at I i n f orme d t h e sented me ; fir my charge o n th e contrary, essert behaviour for two years more, h erse lf i n too l . an d . 1 Jury that the case prqved, i n p o i n t o f f a d, was a n . ed most disfinally, first, th a t the offence was rmir two sureties in 501. ea c h. point of law, a - murder. In every passa g e o f t hi s i The prisoner is a young woman a pp areqt l y un d er: der; and sec e ndly, t h at th e ev id ence was to be be- letter which I marked with i nverte d - cominasa I lievecl. For the . first of these ass e rti ons I nee d not 30 years of age, and was d r e sse d remar k a bl y neat; would be, understood as giving, n ot me re ly- the sub= any legal man, m a k e an apo l ogy. To those who - She heard the teas stated by th e witnesses, and the stance of what I said, but the expressions which I , know and love - the Constitution, the second may arguineLts of the Counsel with apparent unconcern, . used: seem to require some explanation. To these it may tior did the add;e3S of the Chairman, or sentence of However fair the duel, the h om i c id e ensu i ng on \ and must appear, th a t w i t h the credit of the wit- the Court appear in the l ea st t o a il e d h er . it is a murder." Again, "If homicide ensue on a nesses the Judge has nothing to do ; for that, ad . . . ;inn Ring was indiaed for stealing a frock and -- • d ue l , I meeting with deadly deliberate between mrties questionem Pau respondent juratores.'' Accord(pg peiticoat flora the person of Ann Beadle, the weapons; by appointment, such ho,ilicide, will be ly, I will presume to doubt whether another Judge daughter of the Prosecutrix, a child about six yearsmurder, and expose the slayer to the heaviest peinala is to be found, less disposed Or not than I a m, to of age. The faa of the prisoner stripping theties of tile law."---Again, " That the prisoner, encroach, however slightly, on the province of a child was proved; but the prosecutrix not a '—, has been guilty of murder, appears, la% sorry Pa Jury; and my - a full one), for • petting to claim her property, the prisoner was to say, upon his own evidence; 'and no special -cir having observed upon time proofs in the case before acquitted. - us, is—that with regard to the facts, of Ist, a duel cumstances can - enhance or aggravate his crime to • The Chairman ordereci the prosecutrix's re c o thing more." Ar•in• " in attempt • • been a, e place,adia , a hoinicide having any 6a , .t has g - having taken'and ' , nizances to be forfeited, and regretted that the pri-made to distinguish the present from. an ordinary ensued upon. this duel, there was no contrariet • of j, aoner•atiould'have escaped through time prosecuiri ,evidence whatsoever. The prisoner's witnesses gave, duel case, but time 'prosecutors have' more than negligence; and assured her, had she been convicted, failed to prove time prisoner an assassin. But again, , in this reaped, the same testimony with that which site would have beeneransported. "It might be doubted, whether such proof woUld had already been adduced on time part of the pro- Thomas Smith, for stealing a quantity of hem not have been superfluous, if made; for that the p ; seceution. Titus, in a case in which the Editor era and Thomas Williams and Charles- Taylor, for prisoner —, has been guilty of murder, appears, I roneoualy represents the ctalprit as having been ac stealing some lead from a dwelling-house, were am ,sorry to say, upon his owe defence, &c. &c." quitted by direttion of the Judge ; on the cOnteary, • sentenced to be transported for seven'yeats. (cited as above.) 1, the Judge, disthadly told the Jury, that the hotni- In another place, still referring to the attempts . Fide is clearly proved ; and that hi point of law,such made by the pjosecutors to s k ew t h a t t hi s was 110 t a homicide was murder. - I discharged. my duty to the best of my skill an d j u d gment; an d [ gut per- what duettists a fair du e l,, b u t a ki n d o f assassi : suaded that the Jury, whi c h was a m o s t respec tabl e 'nation, J. used the following words RO.M;IN CATHOLICS OP IRELAAD: SURELY SESSIOAS. .I,ikl. IJlbb, the grave-digger, who was co.nviaed at the Westminster Sessions, of stoaling a dead body, has been sentenced to three months imprisonment. LONDON: Printed by RICHA At the Sv24.opri ti -- Y t: . . - " Gentlemen -r cannot think this 'duel to hate been unfair. • It is with reluctance, and almost tis 1(11 I shame that I surfer such language to issue. from the Bench. The distindiuns winch I have been pkiln• too much resemble an indirect sm,aion pioceed ings, which, on the contrary, deserve and meet my total reprobation. Ti e peculiar en - cup:stances 01 the case, and connection which there is bet ween the inuniries on which I liave entered, and the characters and safety of die . pri , oners at the bar, must turoish my exci.,se ; and this excuse, I trust, s fall, bUt little short of a justification." The above Sir, formed cardinal passages in 11.4 charge'; and to you I leave it to pronounce, tuAk a verdict of acqnittal, following' a charge which rot tained passages of such impoi t,' can be considered as found under the direction of a Judge ; or the Judge who gave this charge as assuming a power 'to .“ re mit the\punishment inflicted by law."—l, have now . done; Sir.. Th e express i ons appearing in the paper Ido not undertake to sa)yere yours. Though they were, I should not presume to complain of your hay : ing used them, lest I might Mad% eitently infringe those privileges of Parliament which it is my duty to respect.—But,: Sir, if you did Use them, permit me respectfully to submit io you the above state ' ment of what the tenor or my cli,irge upon tha trial rea /....f was. For the propriety, LW' All its parts, of • flits or any other charge,ot mine, I am far Irons bcing' so presumptuous as to answer. Tilts may perhaps include passages , justly open to animadversioi:. In endeav outing to diseninge du.Y, as Council for the prisoner, I hope 1 auLhot .snrguihr g to risk over-showing, rather than tat nng snort of the mark. I only pro;est a‘ains.t being supposed to lIQVe ' charged the Jury to acquit.—Allow rue to sug g est that possibly you might nave used those expie,sionS sshich I have noticed, under the ot some perfectly blameless misapprehension, Itch in that ea,e you will be glad to nave an_op,,ut tunny ui cor recting, or if the public prints have mis-stated you, of calling on them to correct-1n short, Sit, on ) uur candour, I au, content to throw' mysen.* li•u ate a Gentleman of nigh eminence , in twat proi.-ssion through which I. wade my progress to Inc Beheii.-- You will feel that a Judge. ou g ht not to direct 3 Jury, that hoinicide, 'coonnitted„in a ,hl,, is nor murder, and that a person titling a jud.c:., situat on must feel concerned 10 find a ne‘A, emingt ) ) hold him up as having dune that which lie - o ,rg:lt not to do; and as having been su repreented t‘i uoc House of that ;iParliamenti by %uell, under cer tain circumstances, his conduct is in a d, -glee cog nizable,; and of whose approbation and good opt- Moo he must at all events be ambitious in the ex..' Creme.—lndeed, that those who ate appointed to administer justice should be generally thought well, of, •contided i n , an d uphe ld , you wilt feel to be de' sirable, independently of all considerations which personally ailed them, on principles of public po- , hey and convenience.—lf you shall do me the 10 Hour of answering this letter, you will have the goodness to dire& according to address which. give below. • i . I have the honoar to be, Sir, . 1 With many apologies and much respe& Your obedient, and very hum►jfk se! yaw, W. C. SMITH. [The two cases alluded to in the above letter, are obviously those of I►ldjor Campbell, wit° killed Capt2l/1 Boyd' in a dud in Ireland, and was alien waids executed ; and Mr. Alcock, Mernner tor kite County of Wexford, who killed Mr. Colclougit in a' duel in consequence an election disputd.] * The appeal to Sir Samuel Romilly's liberality was, a g , might have been torseen, fully successful ; and the passag a hi question does not appear in his Observations on utc (;rt tnival Law. POLICE,. MARLROROUGEI•STREihr..-- 7 A young man a •Liell' tenant or Surgeon in the Navy, was charged vk't ll. stealing a watch, the property of I.llr Prin. It ar peared ov the progeeutor's statement; that he was in' sensibly inebriated on the night ut Friday last, and at three o'clock on Saturday morning he awoke out ofa s eep, - on the pavement of Covent-garden, .3 0' found that he had been robbed-"ot his watch and money, amounting to I.t I. 1 f:/. beside s his hat; shoes, &c. The prosecutor describtd . the • watch at several , pawnbrokers' shops on Mo n day ' morn i ng , and 116. tound that it had been pledged at Dubree's to Ox' ford -street, on Saturday, by the pi:wrier, to tub name of Priag, such being engraved on the watch ' case. He Called at the pawnbroker's yesterday,: t cv borrow more money on the watch, when'he WO: taken, atter,running off. In accounting for posse'' siun of the propel ty, the prisoner said tie bought it Ora Woman of the town i,n DeuryL.litne, on night, for a . pOund note, and that he had no more . money, and was obliged to pledge the watch the next day.-7—Tbe prisoner was reina:AQUl(.: another examination'. atilt GRAVESZNO, JULY 16. Arrived the Adatiral'pc:vs, Venables, froln Deal. rara ; Brookbank, from Cadiz ; CotTlrtletCd, front Malta ; Rebecca and Mary, Allen,. front Gibraltar ! andithe Diana, —, from Norfolk. Sailed—the Fietbey, Mees, for Gibraltar ; Friendship, Rojjet, for Bost,n ; and the jean, - 1 ater4on, tot MAle;la. lIIR I tr. On Friday last, at Si:cult:y-1)1II, the Lady of John Mico Winter, Esq. of a Son. Ili A h 1 i, Lately, at Baltimore, M►Z. Mansfield, son of the Lori Cluet justice of the Court or Coalman I'leas,,to the clauet ter of General Smith, of that City. DIED. On Friday last, Samuel S;nith, Esq. of Coldsivotthf Terrace; I< orlierhithe, son of the late Captain Archibald Smith, of the same place. On the 3d inst. at Paisley, Mr. Hugh Simm, aged 73 years. rki~ u SrYD Bank Stock, 2:58 259 Nat, 5 per Cent. sioi 96 Irish 5 per Cent. • 4 per Lent 84 4 , 83 84 3 per +'t. Red. 68i 61 68 3 per Ct. Cons. 66 674 i cx. thy. RD HARRIS, at No. 4, Martlett-cou.rt, Bow-street ; and Pvhiisheil by WILLIAM A RMIG Eit SCRIPPS, South Molt m.strett,-(iroovertor squa:c Clgo N. lUp Strand, wbero ildvertisemeals, Orders for the Piper, Letters for the Editor, Sic, (post-paid), must he athiressad. .% I 9c AS ft-DAY. Bank L. Ann. 181 t 8 3-16114 India Stock, India 13onds, 14$. Bs. pr. Nchcq. Bit ts, 2S. pr Ss. dis . e Oinnium, 14; z tlis. • I . lin perial per Cent. 66 Cons. to: Open. 7o 6