The Sun. — London, England, 1809-02-23 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE' OF PEERS. WEONESPAY, CAM. 'O2. The Royal Assent was notified by Commission to the Nan '..Exclietp.ter -Bills Bill, -the , •One and Half Ex - chegne-r Bills' Bill, and to tO Malt. Drily `Bill.—The Commissioners were tbe I t extl...Cloy.c.oll4, the Duke of Metitrose, and Lord The Debtors'__ Indemnity Bill was read a third time . and passed. Some' Private' Bills were brought nl)'froin the Comm.ns, and. read -a first Buie, The I.kport of Etilistineta'Bill was received, 'and the Bill. ordered to be read - a third tim ni e.to-or. VVV,.*72llljoui'ned till to=morrow: HOUSE ,OF COMMONS. WkDNE4DAY, i'ED. 122. . . . . .., The 'House.went up to the . House of Peers; to ' hear hiS Majesty's Co mission read, by virtue of wh;ch the , Royal /Went wa, given fu the Malt and Pension Doty Ads, and .ttie Exchequer . Bills' ',,8i1l Att. . the Temple ~Bar Improvement Bill was' read a second time, lAncl ; ‘,os ordered to be counnittr& The 14 . ottn AutrOatvre of SconaNt) gtive nutlet, that be WCAILA wove fvr-.4.'aVe to bring in a Bill; to- Morrow, to a:.ia-the Law of Scollind with respeot' Ir. DO NLJAS presented a P11114;6 tiom Mr. fii4)oci 7 v..inione of the-Clerks, exculpaiory of his conduct, respetting the alterations Made in the Distillery ISillr last Session; and which stibjea had beet, referred to 'Seleet Ceintnittee. .The Petition was ordered to be laid on'the • , LA' . 9l). The Hoose resolved itself into a Committee Of Supply, plltiklillll to the (Wei' of the I),q, Mr. WmAttiota jri the Chair, id which the several Esti- Mates for ibe Set-Vice of „Ireland were referred. Mr. FosTga moved that" the sum Of 2a,000l: Irish currency; be &anted to defray the Expence of Civil Buildings in Leland. Lord TEMPLE iltpre6ed his disappreba' tion oldie :• Right Hon. Gentleman Moving struts of such =IA-. mitotic:. without previoui notice. There were several of his friends who were Oa apprised of the money for the tniscellaneow servicerof Ireland heiug voted this day, slid who differed on many of the points, with the Right Hon. Gentleintas who now ,brought Omni forward. Mr. FosTult said, that regular notice had been given of .ins intention to bring them forward, and, he had mentioned the circureistance to several Irish Members, with whom he had since cow mut) ca t ion. If any articles were objected to, he would defer • them, and bring them forward at an eatirday in the ensuing week; ' • Sir J. NEWPoiT observed, that:ho, had yesterday 11 conversation with the night :Hon. Gentleman, who did not mention to him any thingon the subject. Mr. Forrea said, he relied on the,..constancy of the Hon. Member's attendanee, and the accuracy of his memory, and therefore did. not think it necessary to remind him of the business. Tim:question was t hen, ,ptit and agreed to; and We following suln3 were voted : i 5,0001.. tor Printing t ri4h l',,tts of Parliainent. ro,pol. for Printing l'roclainations, &c. in Ireland. 25,n001. for Criminal Prosecutions, and other Law Ex - penees. • - 5 ,00p1. for detnying:thf Expellees of working tote Gold Mines at Wicklow. • lo,coci, for building and Repairing Churehes and Glebe. ionses, a; 0 3.,1. for the Catholic COUV: Maynopth. , • , . . ,• On the question being put that tiounl., tie : r ante d to 'the Commissioners of Charitable 'Bequests in Ireland', Sir. Joy'. '4!'!",,EwllOß:r . 01)59MA.1 . , 'that 'he could hot let the Motion pass 'without - making a few remarks on the corktluct of the Cormiliwiioners:‘ ..He prO • ceeded 10 state that a eptholic Lady . hzid divd:in the pity of. Wazerk t rci, who he,Tteathed 12,00 . 01. to cha ritable purposts,' i 000 of which was to go to poor individuals, without- any respect . to their artd a. larger sum was 'bequeathed to .found an Asp., ham for poor Catholic Gewlemn, and a School, the pupilsef which to beinstructed by the Nuns of , 3 in Water-foul,. A' relation in this • cOutAry diiputEd the will, but withdrew his claims " on taking advice, and it was' said then that a Lady In die was the led • heiress to ,the property.-, When the Agent irr London rclinquisktlhis ' claims the titular Bishop of lvitaterforgl, prnoeedPd to a c t as Exeentor, and received the thsoksirom the corn Thisiieners of Charitable Donations, having Coal slitiniCated to them °his intention. :They, however,. „thought tit afterwards to lia,ve a can% cntered against toe iii in tavonr of ,the. Lady'. in add the busint ;s ‘ras'now before the COurtof Chancery in .01: ineritionedthe ciretunstance tor the in formation of the Compfiltee, anti .4:04 notelet .the .notion .pess without making the commentary. Mr. FOS'iE It 'and "Str A. Watet,est.ey stud, thk was the first time they beard of the eircumstrineo,' but had no doubt but the Lord Chancellor at Ireland would. do justice to all The Motion' was then agreed to, and the report of the Commitiee, on the' House being minified, two ordered to he'received to-morrow, DIJK.F.,OF YO1(k. ITOUSO, art tliu Motion of Arr. WAttinrt,: re solved itself into a Committee to investigate the chargesiai aLtist the. Duke of York. Mr. Wharton in the Chair. Mr. Wit itOt.o moved, that Mary Anne Clarke be oiled in, but on inquiry, the Serjeaut at , Artns re - timed that die `‘Xis not in atthidatiOe ; how ever, soon after arrived, and remained, until site was ogain called, in the vote Office. Hathilwit was called in, and exa timed by Lord . Q. When did Capt. Sanden inform you that be . had certain paperS his possession, and a tiote ; re, ipeEting the inquiry before the liouse.?---A. lie told site gO the day he arrived Iron) Spain. • I Q. Was ii before - or atVer the inquiry had coat menced in the House it was after the inqu try. .a. When did you make •auy mmuutdcation on the st bjea, and to whom °?---A. I made it on the' "Saturday alter I came to town, to; Mr., - Adam.. a. Did Capt. Sanden tell you to do so I do' pot reColleCOiuit he did. Q. Did Capt. Sander) tell you he believed it forged or W.:Willi& Lainly tits such couversa lion took place. Cl. When you saw the role or sersp 0C papor": .did yotr'believe it Wll3 ft rged or genuine ?—A.lti lily opinion it was the Of the Daze of • York, ;nactl did not think it was IOW& G. Are you ..acquaintzd with the'.l.uke of 'Voles: writing never write, I received trio letters, which I believe tollie hisliand-Writing,t 'and .have _seen his hatid,writinwtotticially—to doi:uments. Q. Did you desire Captain &peen no( to destroy the , note l--.A. Certainly.- Q. When you connunuited ,the circumstance to Mr.. Adam, did you believe the mote vasAn encei—A. Judging from whnt;took plaCe, and the conversation I had with him, 'I look it for granted the note was not destroyed. . 14. The witness has stated, that he, before'he went to the .British. Coffee-house, had an interview with the Chancellor of the Exchequer; At. what period did that interview,take place ) —A. After My return to me. Adam, .he - detiitCli communicate every thing i knew to the . Chancellor of the Exchequer, in: Downing-street. Q. Was:that previous to the witness's first visit to the British Cotlee4touse.?—A. It was. Did wit► ess ever communicate to Mr. Adam, or the Chancellor of the Exchequer, that the note' Was destroyed ; and if so, when i—A. had 'no 'coalman ical ion, either personally, or in writing, with '.the Chancellor of the EXchequer, after the 'Morning that I have alluded. to. With respect to . Mr. Adato, I dttnot recollect whether or not I had any pesooal communication with hitn'on the subject; but I eer.. tautly took moans to inform him of it. Q. Then the witness never saw the Chancellor Of the Enchequer prior to his going first to the British Coffee-house Never, but accidentally. I had . no communication with him. a. What indu,':ed the wthiess to seek communica tion with the Chancellor of the Exithequ'cr when he did so Ort the motion of ?Ir. RAT HURST, the witness was ordered to withdraw. Alt% BATHURST then represented, that to a similar question the witness had already given a distinct an- , swor—that lie was desired by Mr.. Adam to call on the Chancellor of the EXehequer.. The witness was again called in. , Q. 13y Mr. ii.o.Aß—Does the witness recollect a slwrt conversation WhiCll he had with me on the • subjedt?.--Yes.. • Q. Doh he recolleft stating to sue that.Cotain Sanden had inforthed him lie bad destroyed the note? do. Q. By Lord FoutsroNa 7 -=When did the wit ness f7trst hear of the note at all In the lost conversatioo which .1 bad with Captain Saudeu ott the subjea. sta t e what passed, on that occasion Captairr Sanden told, me he had seen by the news papers that his Hattld was introduced in tlie- inquiry before the House 'of Commons, and he begged to consult me, as his Colonel, on the line of (=dila which he ought to pursue en the occasion, that I might the better ,adviSe him ; he entered' into a de tail of the transactions in which he had been engag ed, and which were connected with the subject of that impiry. That detail to the best or my recollec-, tion I will repeat to the Committee. [Colonel Hamilton here related., at considerable length, the Circumstances as given in evidence by Captain Sandra his examination, and as stat ed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer in his narra tive.] •r: . . On the motion or Lord FOLKSTONE the witness was ordered to withdi•aw. Lord For.s.suivAs then informed the .ffouse, that ho had just received a letter tram Mrs, Clarke, stating that.she Was in attendance; that she , 4.vits very much indtsp.oaed; .and , that siie was df. , siroits of Ix* ink; ztlitiwed to. give ,Iter evidc oce as soon, ;Is I, o s E ible. . he Cotmuitre'acquieseing in this request, Mrs. - was . called irf, and e4atnioecl to the following (Aka 13y the : CirANOTE,T,AR of tbe'EXCIIRQUER.—^^ 11A Alrs. Clarice brot.ight.ihe two 'itatei 'bat Ole nicticitmed in her last exatnivatioll Tb e y a r e here. Q: Has Mts. - Chirke received any other • notes than these trout the Duke of York bince her,separa tion from his Royal Highness ?—, A, llore than fifty. • -(4. Do you 'recant& having receivea - a note .10 that effea r----(Tliecopy of a note waslbewn to Mrs. ke'Lirke,),—A. I do not recoiled .any thing about it : pObsibly I might, possibly I, might not. I have been looking over my 'notes, wand I .eannot find any thing like it. I know his Royal I lgt4tie . ss wrote ztoother note by. Greenwood,...t.alic'h I ( Q. fidw long is it snyv Mrs:Clarke reeolleaed that . she ,hat ?-.A. Not till jusLnow. Tho,;ie ate theonly letter. tent'aiiiitig, Q. The hmt question repited.---A. I can't tell. I .was nut certain that I burnt it till Hooked over my letters. I never keep any thing that is unpleasant. 0. Did the witness ever know Mts. li'..votirite.by anyothername?,A. No. . . .41. Did bile crier make °Nile witness's. name? I have beeii told so. I. tear Mrs. Yavourite hay been telling a great riony stuiies ; 1 know she did to Mr., Ellis, 'tram service she came to me. Q.. Did the witness ever cap'on her at, ? I,tiov't recoil :4d. . . \Vity did the witnes4 turn her away 'Because I had hist autne thitigi for which I could•not actmunt. - , U. How long was it .after the witness turned Mrs. Favourite away, before she took her into her service ogain?-4..A. yea and half. Net until I much , wanted her. Q. How often hr's Afrs. Favourite been in, the witness's service A great many thugs inution,Of Mr. C. Act uns, that part of the fuuner minutes of evidence Was read , in which. Mrs. - Clarke ,had stated hir having pinned up at the head of . her I.)ed.a list of the . friends Whom she: wished .to be promoted, and which list the Puke of York took down. Q. By Mr. C. ADAMS.--Does the witness abide by that statement r-- - A. , Yes; I never pretended to make a.iy-other. Q How long was that list so pinned up 1 -4 , His it,iyal Highness took it down the second Morn. ing, dre* up the curtain, and read iti I afterwards saw it in his Royal Highness's pocket-book, with scratches through solcral of the names of those who had been piotnote.l. • The witness has said, th4t the Duke of York did not take it doWn till the second naortling. Did :ct:fmnsin up:during the whole of the inlet yelling 1:lay•? ! ,-14.. It did. • • - Gi,..Was it seen by any person . than, the Duke of l'Ork and Mrs. Clarke ?- 7 A..1 suppbse it mu 4 have 'he4n.seen by th,emiid-servarifs-whomade the bed, 'lbt3t.perhaps they could not read. ' • 44. Is the witness quite sure that the Duke of, .Fork-read-the.list-?—A.-Quite.sure-; - for - . ire ward's made some observations on it: He assured 'me that he would promote every one. of them by degrees. • . . • `• Q. Does the witness know it Mrs. Favourite ever saw the list ?--A: I do not. the ATTOHkEY-GENERAL.—Did the:wit, aerie ever live with Mr. Ogilvie No. I never lived with any man but the Duke of York.• U. Did Mr.-Ogilvie ever live with the witness ? A. Will the House allow me to say a few wortis..?..— General Clavering called on 'Mr. W. Ogilvie a few days ago, and asked him to come down and speak against my , charadter. • • Was the witness acquaitited 'with Mr. Ogil vie Yes. - • .. Q. How long ago ?—I don't recol/ea. ' - (. About how many years ago ? two, four, six ?. A. Not Q. Did the witness kndw hiM' before his. embar ras,ments ?—;A. No. - Q. Was the.witnyss examined as a witness at the time of Mt. Ogilvie's failure ?—A. Yes ; bur was 'living at that linie• with the Duke of Xork. Q.; By Mr. WltirrfanAb. The witness says, that she had frequently receiy , ' i letters - fiom the Duke of York sitrce - she quitt d oim ?—A. Yes. Q. Cut she produce one idler Insunstp.nt fate that fat4i?-.. , 4%. Yes; hnt his letters Were not civihafier , I 11:11:C brought some here to shew'rhat the hand-writing is •the same as• that of the note questioned. .4. 'Are theydated ?—A. :1 believe some are. [After'Sotne further cowiersatiotion the shbjeEt,, Mrs. 'Clarke gave in a note, which site stated had been written to her by the Duke siuce her separa tion Iron; him;) • , - • The two notes given in by Mrs. :Clirke st the commencement of her et aminstion thiS night were then read by the Clerk . ; they were:As 'follow " Inclosed I send you the money which you wish to have for your journey." . do not know what you meart I never' authorised any one to plague vr distress you you may therefore be at your easeon my account." • The exami t uation of Mrs. Clarke was then conti, raied. Q. By Mr. Tuompsobr.—Didlliennk-e of York, in. what the witness call's his love-letters, mix any thing whichaelnted td 'military or eccleslasticM pro motions ?—A. I hardly know how to answer that • • qiiestion. t. Has not the witness stated -thnt she has whit she calls love-letters, frorn.theOuke of York, in her possession ,at present ?—A. Yes, I have, and of my friends have also GI, Is . any thing in_those.letters yelatiVe to tary or ecclesiastical promotions No. - - Q. Mr.. LOCKH AAT any person. present • when the witness looked over the nopers Wed to the subjc4 of this Inquiry ?—,A. I Item let any person look.over-any papers. U. :By Mr. 1-.lltaski-r.—When ,the witness was in Gloneeiter-place, she pay her bills herself, or through the meditini of her housekewer —A. Some . tunes the nne - -..01n-etintes the other, ~ I 'never paid My baker's and batchees• bills myself; they were paid by the housektncr... Q.: Who 'Was that house-keeper Mrs. Fa , vourne. Did Mrs. Favourite ever represent to the wit ness that her creditors were very chitnotous ?- 11„. Yes ; but I never minded ,wriat she said, Gt. Did Mrs. Favourite reprctsent to the witness the necessity of the Dike of York's supplying her with moody to pacify 'those .creditors.?--A. Yes ; of course, if she was teazed by thetp,.site teazed me. Q. Were those debts to a considet - able amount ? What is tuettni, by; a considerable amount ? Q. To Ihe amount of t 0001. ?—A. I.do not know In What amount they tvete. • Q. Does not the witness know that hills to a largo amount were paid by the Duke of York, in conse-', quenco of en application made 'to him by the witness on the representation of .Mrs. Favourite ?--A. 'No. H never paid any, of think: bills, a Ithpugli I know it bait been so represented. . . [After some conversation on the subjea of any fur ther notes, it was agreed, that Mrs, Clarke should ftend town Jo the House any, with dates, that she might have received from. the Duke of York after her separation from him.] • Q. 11. ) , Sir T. Tt.rwrosir— , Does the witness reCol led, that in the.presenee of Miss Taylor, the Poke of York and the 'witness ever. talked of militar=y pro niotioiN —A, I am stir, I can't say ; the Duke of York did not mind what he said before Miss Taylor; he was,very fond .of her. Q. By Mr. LocknAitT.--I wish to , kuow the namos_ of the frielitis who hare the letters of the Duke of York in theirposstnsiori, alluded to . .by the wk. nesi in a firmer ansAret I the motion of Lord FoutsTo!,lE, the witness Was'Orderecl to Withdilw. A conversation arose on, the popriety of this question lietWeen 'Lord Folkstone, Mr., Lockhart, Mr; C. Adanis, 13atturst, the , Chancellor of the l'Achequer, Mr. Rose,. Mr. Mrhithread, and Mr. IYenitis" "Browne; afkr which the question 'was withdcawe; anti. it was ordered that Mrs. Clarke-be' informed she might go away. ColonelHamitton was called ini.and his examina . tiou remitted. U. By Lord FoLxsToNE.—Did Captain .:Sailden: state to the witness from' wbom he received the note? —A. From Mrs. Clarke or that it had b.en con veyed tohirn Irtnn.Mrs. Clarke. Q. When the witnes.'.. saw the note was it wrap . ped up in a piece of paper, or accompanied by t* piece of paper, with thesitnilardirei..iion Capt. Sanden sheiked me a similar corer, with the Dover post wait upon' it. . Q.. Did the witness inform Mr. Harrison that the note. had been desiroyed by Capt. Sandell I—A. Yes, Q. Why I—A. Because I understood that Mr/ Harrison was ernployed . as an agent of the Duke of York. Q. From whom did the witness learn that ? A . sev u ral Locik How o long_ ha 4 the witness been acpainted with- Captain lioncien ?—A. I remember ha% ing teen him in 1793, He never wits an acquainiance of tune. a. ii y M r. Sit A 1.%.: . LE I' I: 13 :—Al r ag it witis ree lu&ance that Capt. Sandell . allowed. the witness to. copy the tiote ?—A. No, Q. When. Capt.. Sanden told the witness that he - had destroyed the note, did he say any thing .libotrt that copy ?—A. Never. - t4 By Lord'iMtr.Ton.—When the Wiiness corn., _ Tritinidafei.l to - Mr..A.i.!ant whall) - 6 knew of the trJni- tion, was it with the expeOation that it would he • made known in.the House?- I —A. Lstated it to Mr. Adam; because I have becwa - cquainted with him many .years, and know him to he a Man of honour and integrity. I wished to take his advice and opi-• hien, not having come to.any prceitctticxisiOn'in my own mitid. , Q. Did tit.e‘Witness.conSider the note . of ance' to the inqtftry.?—A. I believe the note; to the .best of my judgment, 'to be in the hand ivriting bf - the Doke- of York. it was therefore inipossible that I skould not attach to it:great im portance. Q. After the'Witness!s coMinvication, with the Chancellor of' the Exchequer, did he know that it was the Chancel*of,the Exchequer's intention not to state thdtransaelion to the House for sonic days . ? A. I had no knowledge whatever of the,Chancellor of the Exchequer's Q. By Mr. LOC . KIIART.—Did Captain Sandell . mention te•the kivitness his intention of d e stroying the .uote ?—A. 'On .the contrary be promised that would preserve all the papers. Q. Did he ever mention to the %*itness that he had destroyed the papers ?—A I have already stated that he did: Q. Did be mention to the witness his motive for doing to?--1: 1 never knew any motive. which t aatiated any part of Captain Sanden's condat. Q. Did Cappin.Sanden ever mention to the 'wit.- ness that the concealment 'ot the note would benefit any person ?—A. Never. Q. Did he ever say that the prodglion of it would be prejudicial to any pi ron ?—A. Certainly . not. , • .Thewitoess was ordered to withdraw. • Harrilon examined 1) Loid FULiss'ro.bit'l• U. Are' yon Agent or council for the Duke•ot York ?—A. No. ,LI L Are yOu ernplOyed for him in any .way .1 am consulted by his Royal Highness, in his charae .ter Of CoMmander in Chief, from t he,knowlcdge 1 supposed to possess:On milin-try subjeds, andiv ., t'-• a'ked to attend to the busine,s noW'betore the Committee. - •Q. In consequence of - this, have you constantly' ttt tended the proceedings on that iubjea iu this Houses - - ---A. Certainly. (4. When • did Colonel Hamilton tell yOu thd: note was not destroy'ed AbOut five o'clock of that day on which Captain Sanden saw him. • Q. Did yon take any steps in consequimce of that - information ?—A. I Caine to the House, and found I the Conunittee sitting. I coipmunicated the intelli° uence to Mr.. Huskisson. ~ • Q. Was yon present on .the night of the In quiry' after that communication was . made ?-- -- A• Q. Nit.','as••rur communication 'made before tin'% staternt given by the Chancellor of the Exellequet —A. Certainly it was. Mr. HusitssoN examined in his place by Loi,i Po KtI.ONE. Di'd, you receive , this infotmation .from , Mr: 'Hart ison at the time alluded to ?—A. I did; I then stated to my Right Hon. Friend, the Chancellor of the Excliegner, that the note was not destroyil; adding, that it mattered not Whether or no it was existence. • Q.'"Had you heatd of the nate before that:tin-rel.. —.l. Yes, hi confidence, by my Right Hem Friend,. and of cOlonel.Hamilton's iiquiry into the cirt:otilf stances. The ettANCELLOE of the ExcirEtatnit-examine d by,Lord FOLKSTONE. Q. Do you with to correa . any of the evidence given by you on Monday ?--A, T am not aware that 1. have any alteration to make. If there are any questions the NobleL?rd would wish' to ask , I will answer them. Q. 'At the time you made the statement to 41 4 House, did you.know what is now told, that tho note was not destroyed ?—A. I statedt that .titoo to the House, that I did not knew* , 'whether it was destroyed or not. There Was a strong ice' pression on my mind that it was. destroyed. Q. To whom did you, communicate the circum• stances connetled with the note ?—A. I can tuen• lion. some, bot am . no;, sure that I can recolle4 every : name. 1- mentioned- the' circumstances to - .Mr. Huskissan, Mr. Canning, Lord Castiereatlt, Mr. Yorke, ,the.AttOrney : and, Solicitor-General, VP . the Lord Chancellor, and to Lord LiverpOol, who all concurred with rue in.opixtion, that . my Learned Friend (Mr. Adam).should 'make a similar corntna: niCation to some friends of. his on the other side of the House. I stated to every person to whom I men tioned this at the time that I conceived it to be clear duty not to be:made the depo,itory of suc t ,i' so statement ;. -hut frog!t .fir4.day.l kn e w of it „ - „ e deterthined to make it .o . oblic. I *believe I" ) knew of its e4istence. till I lie:trd it . was des lo Y-, e ,,-„ except the Lord 'Chancell or: In my eianlio t ifi 'i of Captain Sadden; 1 -bore'irt Mind- all b * - 1- wittims had said in, his coannuuication to. Colon'. Harnituin, and would ln;e asked hial if, 00:1/ (41 W as nut destroyed, 'brit (pun what 'he told Cqlo oe Hamilton- in the morning.., Mr. HusKtsioN 'repp. tte lus statement .in. e ‘.. -planation to guard against mistake. Simicrron GESEItAIi. r contirmcd that the ChatteellOr . 'of the Exchequer had', train the.tir;t,(lt dared his resoluti o n t o ma k e th e . Note pLiblt cl Y and w v 1, 10 1V Ie ll: t t i ller: it was's., real: Note or a - tbrg ( l' n t 's te o l a it cc il u t se f.a d v . °Lir (:)q, or ilga:iltie OW • Mr. CANN I N G bore-his testimonylo , thunte ef sa fefl ; that his Right I-fon. Friond was always r e '' solved In relieve hisconscience from this charge. A Mr.. ADM exaniined Lord . Pot.ttSTOIL Q. Did you receive from Cot. Hamilton any 1011 1 • lustrious per so mation that the note Was destroyed ?—A„ No , „ might have'reeeired.'such a notice from Mr.' Filt r ' ; - son or Mr. Huskisson, as I believe I did about th e time it was hinted- first. I was as determined Chancellor of the laxctiequer to coannunisate circumstance t conneted•with this note to the put' and, in consequence of this impressioni.an (itst.of thei Right Hon. Gentleman, did make theta, known to Loco H. Petty,- Mr. Whitbread, and t-7