The Sun. — London, England, 1808-11-09 00:00:00

LIB' REPORT. COrkT OF• CIIANCER) - (, Nov. 8. SHiltT, &C. V. WESTBY, &C. , was a snit in which I r t nurith.A. of .persons, 11,Thors of James Harfit; broth - 0 - to .th•Tv.stator, 'Hurst, and who'weie left under the will of latter, toe principal sums respeaiye:y du to Ihew by- the Janney, were Plaintiffs, and the per kons owitled to the real estate of the Testator, Sohn fin•-:, were Defendants. It had been. refern2d - to th.• :daT:er to inquire and report, how fat the debts d:,e by James Hurst, for payment, of _which t•vd-been made in the will ofJohn ifqrs!, were pat:A, and discharged; and the Master had reported, that 1110 several &ins contained the schednie, nronber six, which referred specifically to. those debts, remained wrpaid. The case now Came .be ;ore ;lie Court. in the shape of farther directions to the Matter, :rd the point in dispute between the parties amounted simply to this„ whether the Viaintill's were or..were nut entitled to Inte'rest on the several sums attached to their daces in the will of :JOhn Hurst. . ROMTLLY nV p 1 3 , Tr. contend-. tirit the,cl : iiin of the'il'iVitifts toder tte pre - sti , l will amouoted i 0 CATAF'of schednled ctibts, or of. le4ocies on landed estates; in both of Bich cases, iuieres on atlt - ount of the debt a manner„ as.a matter of course. Mr..ll7tn - ARns,,Mr.' IA.LEXANDER, and Mr. HA LL , the other. hand, contended, that here there was no complete adoption' ot a .debt, nor any. complete gift or legacy. The gratit partook of.both of these qualities, but it Aid not awount to a recognition of either: It \Os a gift:of so niLch .ktioney.in paymen t of the debts Of the Testa I or'i brother; it WAS neither an absolute undertaking to pay the debts, n or.. ye t an unconditional gift, by' .% • !14.1i t!:, person:on whdmit Was conferred was to he inve,t4 . witit,.all the quali ties ola legacy. TheTestotor'Htencleat.he sums re pet:lively left by hirn to the Plaintiffs ai,a s,c,rt of in deotni“ to il , etn ?of, Ipss thq,y had sustained through his- brVier. He - neither wished to put himself 1, ly in the ,situation of the, brother, so as tO'bee.oine bound ,to pay his debts, nor yet to appear • to jaestOw the legacies as voluntary. gifts, suggested by any caui - 6 unconneeled with:the debts of his bro ther. If it Was to,be held as the intention of the Testator to 'give to ti:e filaiiitiffstlT interest of:their debt; troM ' the deo: h'ot •the Tguip r ,. it might wit h etyial ..s iiistice be contended, tlia such interv . st out to have - rtiti from the tithe when the debts became payable. The Testator, however, had dope no such th;og. He had stated the precise sum.to•be paid .to I Cacti- Of ins orother'A i'reditors, attd the 'art of tone of , hesq sums' exceeding. the rincip.ll,debt;oonvey ed, io ttle'stroogc_strais, the a,,claratio-nof his in-. to that as they did' 'nen bear'intere , 4, aotece denitry to, tiOther should they bear such ii serest of- I —1 tor his do eva,e. . _ • ~ Sir S. itein t 1,7 in 'reply, stated; that fia .. 5s case lay withL:l.l:er; 'snort lialit. .Etti,f?;i - 1i,,,.1;(..i.vat0r had • . . I, ; . • •adoptedthed,:ibts of his brothe r 4,1110,tmi1, or he had nsi. , :wei , ic,,,„cieA, to the aioount specified in th e will, to - alt! he persons there rnentio9ed, assigning, t;3 liis . reas• . )n for so doing,_ their being credittirs of :Cis brothel . to the emens of iiii,legacies tespec,"--tiveir granted to•them; lu either event the stinis specifi e d , muit c:.ltryeinteres:t. • - • - ___ The LOP.D CHANCELLOR retTlarke, that the Mas ter had not computed interest on the simple com traet debts of - the Testator'hitbself. It would, t-here 4 fore, be an odd way of executing the d'eeNe, it the contraa debts • of the brother, provided b y tiro will to be fulo, wure to carry ititereit, and those of the Testator-were not to 'carry Sir S. ROMLI_LY informed his Loc,:s4ip.,.-that if this i.ea was suggested b) pet - Using toe bat schednle ~.to the will it was et tpne6us, that. schedule contain ing no debts of the Testator's, and he having in fad no simple col:ttaa debts. There, were ow) , two • ways ot yievring.this quesipn-.—if the Gentlemen en _the other side said the ,Testator had adopted his brother's debts as his 0 - wit, be mtfst hate adopted the interest as Neel! as the principal. If, f on the other hand, as be thought more natural, he hal given' them as legacies, assigning, nevertiieless, the CA of their b.:ing creditors of his brother as his rea son for reevAizing them in that -capacity, they muse hem the nature of, the grant, be entitled to the interest on sucio legacies. Thq. Loup caANcELLdit said, it was impossible in this case to say that the Testator had taken these-as his own debts. It_yvas clear froth the whole tenor of the declaration made by hi;n, that he had no mean ing t h at the antecedent interest shcitild be paid.— cyb e o nly o qUestion was, had the a'estat9r given these s'unis uy way of 'legacy, and, if would they . .7ear interest - the less b....canse ,819..,% i cr.e for debts . due by the-Testator's brother. l 64.not, t hi s a part of his - bounty to he paid out-oi his estates ; if so, was it not, like other legacies, to bear inter , st frO,m the time or his death ? His L or d s hi p iiv•litwd to think-that it ought. He thertiore.Order ei it to be referred back to the Master', to calculate ha interest on the several sums payable to the ri a - mt i t i i , at t h e , rat e of four per Cent. Iran] the death 4f the Ttistawr thee debt; acing charges on the 4e.,11 e,tatei alone. COURT OF KING's bENCfI, Nov. S. WIN; 'V. MILES. Mrc ATTOaNEY-GEN.IilikL, Mri"CA'rittow, and Cut? MING, shewed c?iuse . against a - , 1“1,1c •:;,;• a n c -iw trial in this a.7;:iob, which Otir'readers Al recoiled was brought by a creditor of hi Royal (ightie..is the- Duke 0.)! Su.siex against the . Sherifi of .Q.ddlesex, for a ialse return upon an, ,execution ;;•eied at - Kensington Palace: The question in .this wash whether Kensington, being a Royal t'.;l ice, was not privileged from the execution of :?,.1 process; and it ',vas . theirerdi6t of the Jury in ,• of this that was ntv attempti-d to 'be, .It will-be recolieeted, iliac it was proved at ttre trial, that although his present Majesty had at Kens:ngtutr Palace, yet . th NAIL, still his, and might still be cornmanded to ei, e him at a 'day's notice. The chap:ain, house -1-....e1•t-r, deputy house-keeper, garde . neF, and porter, appuitited.and paid by him. There were still a re -1.2,•41ta tilt re Buda state-bed, whenever his Majestycliose , to toake use of them. - Mr. AI:TWIN/IN GENERAL con- LONDON: P_rintetl by RI cti.a o Ra s, of No 4, 'Tartlet -court, Bow-st re e; ai At the S , . tiN-0/IrGi No. J l'z''otrand ; 'where 4 t/other/anis, Orders ; tended, that Kensington frouse was a Palace bdth in not denied, lam afraid we should be doing- Much law and fact. The contrary, in point of law, was in- leirin by going, into it upon the e present octiision:' sisred by Mie'MAaa vArr'at the trial': but Lord EL, - Me. GAR‘ROW--7" Mr. Dogherty was induced to.; LEN BOROUGH was of opinion, that if it had ever been priblish it partly frginenecessity e be having- teen.' declared r palace by Proclerriations issuiugt from • "denied all assistance.fromehose of his relation s Who, . , ... thence,. it Was niedoubtedlyea piLice. 1 Ir. kireß. e Were orplent.: ' NV;Y GENERAL. therefore instanced the Proclmetion . Mr. IV.I.AanYATT,. O tt lie eagle side, said, that he - of the Prayer , books oftlielast reign, .wliere, the date . must,,adinit the pnblicetioti was certainly• Very libel , . of their patent would be found to run—" Given at ' loos. Manrof the ,facts,: however, : were net .de , . e our Court at I(ere3ington,!".tiec.. But . there W'aS no nied by . Mr.• 'Hunter, -while• he lied denied o the rs ; , doubt le bad been a p a l ace , an d _the question was, vhereas, if - he hal traversed.the whole of- the faets'• whether it had . discontinued to be one. :11 . 40 - Lamed , stated in this pablipation, the .Rule must necessarily Counsel contended, it had not diseontinued :• there ; -- liave, been rendered :absolute, • but , otherwise he. . were estate apertme:es kept for hi, 'f,..1 jest) , ;+ there thnuee4rit could . not. . . ~ . , , ~...„ . - v. ereapai tiiients c;4,1. a ti,o,Lmde,t;dinl;,..fstill'Separt- .tetr..I)OI.INTON illSO; on-the same side; observed,- meets, andohere were - eieires regularly i.uourited ; ' 'that the libel ti, as, in very general terms, as to Mr. : slid it a.pelace were really 'Kept ready . to.receive his ; Hunter. himself.; brit lit . was - . piiblished „under' the" Liajesty, the privileges of that palace Were not affeCte • ieflueoce of feelings that were. very sore;.. Mr. Hun ... ed becauseie actually did not receive his . lVlajesty, ter was not the only per Son of whom .Mr:DogNerty Lord ELLENBettebOlt cited.s:everal cases,.par t ticn 7 complaitie.d, and therefore there were , othetepersonS lerly from 2 'Lord RaynL 978, and f:i Mod e 73; to . whose conduct wanted. explanation. • - s. . . • the elecidetion- of this question';-, and. seemed of . The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, in support" of- the opinioti, that a palac e cont i nu ed to be toyaleattless tale, .said, it would be a .new sort • of,doarine to.. .-. there were circuurstance . s to diseen s tinne it. • After suppose that beCause Mr. Hunter; had knot denied,. the death of the late King, its . charaeter of royalty all the parts.of this libellous 'publication, „a-persou',7 continued, and the question was„ -had . it:been 105 t.,? , who could find any thing in the life of some iridi.er:l. • -,--41. the Palace had been dismantled, so as"to ren- . e viduals deserving of . reprehension„ Should. there, , der the King's habitation impossible, -it would be for: be at, litierty to insert 'that in a publication, another thing; audas to 411 tee present occupiers of aed --add to - it as manytalseliceids - as he pleased rela the -palace, they were liable to be turned outs to- 'i tive to another man, without that man having• the morrow. • , , ~ l power to c o me i n t o a Court against the libeller. . . . . . Mr. GARROur put the case on a level, wl.t Win& Ha - could =not admit this doctrine,_. as, it :omight 'sor Castle-and St.*J ames ' s Palace, .and said that no- aftbrd the Means by,l,Vhiell....a great deal'of slanitier body '‘Teuld-cletly they were palaces because be did , might :be introduced with e impunity; and he be not see the flag flying upon the tower. of the one, and heved it was upon that, and that;atone, a .great: because the T.liling' had not resided at ;44 otner tOr a maey of the libellers oftlie present day xested.-.41e long time. His Majesty - enjoyed no, security of fris theretbre should. oplf,ssy, 'tha't it appeared. quite prypeety for a moment, if his -presence xieas to be ieepo-shale the Court' could hesieue as to the proprie the ()Lily teste, the cart that carried away goods i;retn‘ ty of this rule being-gN-Inted: If it were other Wise, • his Palace : might dri v e -out at one gate_ as he‘ aro+ e he shouldl have no-ehjet!..iion tegoe'into the facts. , - , - . in at another. What quits tuy of residence, Me. Mr. Deeliertylitid written 'one letter, while he was I C3440i0+.4, ; • would ail constituted e :Palace ? Tnis in custo,ly, addressed to Mr.- L I-10liter, wherein- he ,could never lae..eseertained.: The question Of Inc . _ ha4.l threatened .to publish this libel, unless ; lie Jibe . , tact was Icli .to the Jury, and in iii , s Opinion thev : rated him. - - - lieu tumid the truth. , . , . . e ' 1 . ..Lord. Eke eNaoltoteort• thought that the puhlica, i Lord .ELIENISOItOUGII cited an' ACt :of the 4th ' lion was highly calumnious in its nature. :The only ei.iry,\/•Ii.•-chil-p. 3, vviere 3 place of occiiiiuniil ilie, queniorn tperefore, that . ' remained, , was, whethert hie the reireslenent of tile king, e iti,passtag to-St. "; .M.r. Hunter, trout his not having traveised. every I Paul's, was ealltd a-Pai a c e . . T - imputation, li'! -net entitled to the 1 , \ ! , - ,1 r• ' CUMMLNOr in s tanc e d Prociarnstionq made by special interposition, of the Court ? He could not _the..present _K'e'gs immediately inter the death of .; help thinking, - ,that it would be admieistering.but the late, -- trouts .tc.,nsington Palace.. ' ' scanty justice to refuse au infortnation to an in di; ..V . lr, bctjemii WILLIAms auciMr. MaltavAeriespie. ; virtual applying_ for it under such- eircumstaeces; , .poritkl the., rele. ' . because he could ntee give'a Sati'sfaelory answer as Mr. Serjeein. WILLIANS •said, it was itnmeterial ; to the• whole 'of the:fans detailed in the libel.— whether it was a Palace or not ; the-question was, , This would be giving /:ie 'fullest prote&ion to wbeiller it was exempt troin the execution of . legal , slander that could possibly he devised. The 'Role process.He urged coat t a e 'King had never resiete.l . upon this point •was first n it ntloned 'to tlit! cas..l 144 at Kensington with , all. 'his soite: •as . mo th(J . house-• : King te..Mlies ; and it •was no 'doubt a leeed ride;to. ,keeper th;it.-Was-i here till. the King 'could dispose of : abide by as, to libels; bat he never lore:, the Court the Palace, he must put soinewely in it. Wliy. : ,s3y, drat-every word of a libel. Must betravetsed. - wiyre P.llAceicxempt Irons the execution of I eg . 4i ' Their discretion, was not to be boand dot. a by the • process % Beea u se,, o t the -King's dignity, and tnat no. strut letter of rule, but to h:• , governed by sound such distorbanee L ivight happ en in his presence as sense and. reasoti, applicable to th (::-o,:e. in question. could be occasioned by such execution. 'Phis are ,- Fle thought they could nut refuse. the Rule; bitt guirient could teat hold, when it .vas admitted that, i he. coalrimided , die Counsel on b o th .siLts for not tor along remit of 43 yjars, the King had, nev er r e- ; bringing 'forward. the circumstances of the libel eided, there. -The Learned Serjeant. then cited ail again.- . . . • ' e , the Mitli4C3SeS he:could find, begieniiig with Lord : Mr. Jostice GROSE .United in this opinion. - • Coke's definitions of the word Court, in his Proem Mr. (4,eaßow added, that the Liniment Mr, Dog to the 4th Instit.'and co . mrnented 'on theist with herty found this publication wag complained ut, h e Much ingenuity_ . . . applied to the booksellers to stop the sale of it, and Mr. NJ:llia/ ATT. said, the question was, whether also to put a stop , to the advertisements.—Rule abso the .privilege arose propter revereqtiqm .loci -cut per. -. lute, some; whether it was the spot or the person that was sacred ; and the privilege evidently was instituted to praent a dieturhance to the Soiiereign, and not to his deputythousekeeper (for there was only a depu ty-huuselteeper, to. Le found at the Palace). There . was a liOitsekeepeie.at Newmarket-ho,se and at th e e . Cockpit ; but -nobody ever dreamt - that those resi- TII2 KING V. BELL, FOR A CHALLENGE TO EIGHT A DUEL WITH . MR. FITZGLRALD. The Defendant lives a ‘ t Wincsesier ;, the Prose mar at Southarnptun.--Ituleh.tr Criminal infcrrina- . tion . againk Mr. Fitzgerald declard absolute. denies were Palacus. There had been lately issued.. a proclamation from Culfnells; but nobody sup- posed Mr. Roie's Ironic Was privileged from an ex- . ccution. As to the e gg:ads that . were mounted at Kensington, there were gnarl's- mounted *at the Tower; and to talk 'or _a 'preache r a t Kensington Palace Chapel, at Whitehall there Were twd dozen. If the King lett his .Palace with an animus revel - 10A, it .was.uodoubtedly still a Palace; but' the Learniid Counsel contended that the initnutiity ceased, when- the reason tOrgratiiingit,cep a sd., . . COURT OF COMMON FLEAS, Nov. 8, NOERIS V. VEARD. • This cause w,:s tried during the late Sitiing,s at Guildhall before the CHIEF Juric, aud a vei,diet 1!.: 154 . . 6d, obtaii-trd for the Plaintid. Mr. Serjeant SN RPIIERD this d.q.tnovcd the Court for a Rule to tax . the D.-"fendant's costs, and svet• diem 'off akainst the Plaintiffs verdict, under the. Statute of the 43c1 : G0. ILL The Plaintiff' was an Apothecary and Man-mud wife resid,in'Y near Sdisbur- and had attended the fittnily of,the. Defendant r proles,ionally, particularly upon his•wile's accOucherneot, upon occasion •his usual fee was half-a-guinea. The bill , Ahert Ori ginally furnished amounted to 11.18 s. 6d. ; few days before the Def en d an t' s arrest; , the Plaintiff' called on his wife ; requested'to see the bill, and tore the amount off: He soon after arrested him for 101. His.- The Chief Justice thought We' verdict was perteftly right, and had no doubt that the debt . o f 1 ot. this.. was tabricated'for the purpose of , arrest ing/the Defendant ; but twd witness e s_ ( one a man of Tespeaability); had po itiyely sworn to two pou . fessions of the,Defendi.mt to the' amount. it w'a s a case of ouch suspicion when the party . Chose to try it at Guildhall, London, 'in . preference . to trying it at Salisbury. His Lordship recommended - it to the consideration- of jhe Lealned Serje;int„ Whether, for such a sum, it was worth while: drawing up th!., Rule.-11ule granted. Lan.I I ELLISZN.I3OIIOiIGII.--7" This is a trie'stion of int , a6,t 'and iinpbrtatice, and the Court most 'take some time to look into it; . poes'itny one know, as a matter of information; whether process is extent- Holyrdod House %" . Mr. ATTORNEY-GENERAL.--" No, my Lord, it is not ; •aud this consideration has induced several persons to reside there:" GUEST V. GITTEY. The ATTOIINEY-GENERAL moved for a new trial in this case, which, he said, was an issue under a private INclosure Act, tried before .Nr. Justice LE BI,ANC, at Shrewsbury. 1 Certain lands were to be iti;:losed, and the Commissioners desired all per ,ions having claims to give them in. The Plaintiff accordingly put in his claim for a right of the corn• mon for tiiieep but the Couatnizsioners ordered this to.be amended, and according to a-printed form they had prepared, which was L,o worded as to express a right or common for all cuinmonable cattle. Upon .the trial, however, it was objected, that the claim was larger than the right.which the 'claimant was entitled to. The sheep-right was proved; and espe cially indorsed upon the postea ; but it was objected that ouch au. indorsement was contrary to the usual practice, ankt of no effect. The PlUintill finding him self in this situation, his only resource, was anew trial.—Rule granted. TIJE KING V. DOGHERTY. ,• Mr. 'GAIiROW stated, that he was to shew cause against the:Rule. for an information in this case.--, hwas an application on the part of a father-in-law, , to top the publication 'ofa book containing passages _that were libellous. The affidavits were very lung,. and as they,rela(ed to disputes entirely of a fatuity nature, and he co:ild not contend that Mr. Do . ;herty denied the linellous publication, he having assigned reasons for it, he (Mr. G4attOw) coUldlt9t do good, but, on the contrar z y.,.rnuch harm, by entering . into .a detail of the whole CirCinstanc'eu that would tend to justify then . ). Lord ELLEsEor.ouert—" - .1? the publication 5,, Mr. Serjeant Lvis, on behalf of the Defendants . , moved 'the Court to set aside the verdief, contending, that inasmuch as the delay vas occasioned by the arrest of the Captain, and not hyany negleEt or in) prOper a& of the Defendants, the latter were nbt liable to demurrage to. that amount, the question for the Jury being merely as to what compensation the party was entitled to for the accidenial delay. Bank Stock, .236 1237 Navy 5 per C.'e:a. 99 4 51,4 iper,Cent. 1797, f ish s.per Cel.t. 95 •95 4 per lent.: 3 per Cent. Red..66'rit 3 per ;:ent. Cons. 67 67 Bank L. Anil. IS publishsd by NV! LLiext A itmicsErt Sciit Prs, South Milton-str , et, Groivrnor-squatti, or the raDer, letters far the Editor, Sec,- (t2ost-paid) must bc:addnused. ~ .l„ .• FEELING V. HEATH-AND OTHERS. This was an Action of Covenant upon .a Charter . - party, whereby till Deferidants'were the freighters of .a ship bonnd from Surinam for Lon'. don, to forfeit demurrage at the rate of nine gins per day in case the ship did nor sail. With, convoy at a certain time. The ship 'was ready in. time. to Sail, and bad: proceeded down the river to join convoy, bnt the Captain' was detained On shore, _be ing arrested by the At torne"y, Oeneiar . of that piac'e upon a former imaginary charge, hi Collsequ 6 nce o f which the ship \vas delayed, 'alid the cove nan t broken. The'cause was tried at Guildhall, and the' Plaintiff 9btained a verdiit to the full amciulit of de tuurrage-9601., The - Court conceiviin it a fit case for consider';" tioh;Alsalitpd a Rule t shew c a use. CK NS/RIGHT, ON THE DEAIiSE OF; UNITT, . 1 " $ Ais:l) This was an aLlion ,of eie.atnent broug ht to, rover pgssession _of some !yids in Shatordshir t - -ducetriedbefore Mrs Justice LAWRENCE at Assizes,when a ,verdict was obtained for the'llo e fendants. . • 14r. Serieant BEiT, on behalf of the Piain s betty; moved the .Court to •geraside the verdio,'a against evidence, and in.the abit'mce of proof. . case had been tried upon a forrner occasion bOin.r. -Mr. JustiOe and a verdid obt 3 ine l io .` ° e the Piaintitf to the en t ire satistaßion Of Cllr tlie. late , occitsion the vet dia Was . the oppostie way,. and against the diredion of the LearpeOJP - ri who tried it. The Pia'intiir4 clan - he'd the Under the Will of one \Vakeley, who died in leg i "; having made the Will in queStinn in 179 1, period of the Testator's der:eaie, a Vir. Goodall who tvas a friend of the 'assis•,ed in serlrc ili ',.? for a Wiil in th e apartment where - .the Tes.tatordleu, -and . was .seen. to. put leversl paper* in poci ce o alledged were only' se.euxitie , 1 co: :id be found, until some years afterwar..'s was di'covered that the \V 111 io'fiueliion;: 4 o in thep:3s , ie.ssion or Mr. Gooclail-,.:who produee• it under various pictences, cited . by the ,t. - ,;cclesiastical Wfwo to was produced, it a'p[ic--i red ca:!c, , lled, Cf • !;i . ; all -alleged .Shat it- was. pot 'done. by hint, 1 :) 1 ` 7ft . ..sta;orliiingelf same yeArfs.pTevicus in a of p.tg.ipn, el'he of the alleu of pas• - yn, TioNye;ier . , 7 did nor accord will: thei iic p of the alleged , : , cattcellatibyr of the ;Will; at wPre.it, b l e t gi'' hitsfeif't I)ear,eci Os°. from :Pic .slinife o f ;tie'Vi!l, -ettrieellatioiiuttist bave..beetl42l .prettif-dit ed -. With a Niir of.sc.i.rzsars.-or soine tea. instrunwti t., nrit . in.d - tit Pasiton. • Mr. Good.t.ll. l'1% },Lt11 :1, 1 1 qs-Rri:ovilence upon: fiv7-il; • .31 -11 :1 9 E t) ' : t L the_ L-I")'er thesep • i .o ' l for. a new . ..trial was niade. !•- li;e11 - e td.shetv_eause."-. . , Es ti 4 . ~ TPIZ .put;.% Or - KEN"TS . • a 1 • nnifiw!. description, At the.. rn: - cf.y . ' of t form app- iis trie bakh, whieh i, Callsiul,llc4,l' I ~a ct i • c: Grecian , couch, . ii,ned t lo thc are be ti ing 7 l a 'a •G i b i f l i ornaments { this recess •are closets ; 't ~1 t f f:11' of the rer,.04.,s is iinea yeltcw canto in in ;70y.";73:01ing the-,r4s- 9 f-iile s on. ...itlcl , .‘s,-(l by folditt dhorki., - cor,::10::..• 311-(I ;jr0 ixit - A-teci 0:i:1k:b. oppf);p,..i s id e o f fifted - ttyyitli ak)' Cohtd;:iitig"iv.ery rlebess2ry appa(aiQs f or a,ccornipedatipri. Attached to every 'door B r 7d angle in the room is a separate belt-pail, 'lu handles, on w hi c h; r;re engraved the ntlic ,, i ° l,47o - connefle:i his , j n nes, s tablishment. The chairs and cu uca‘; ere , this room awl singularly ei-arint and z i . )e i at ' made to correspofil with tries bat- 13 . c ;lk rn ol P e °s o e. f d - t ° fi f e a su ri i t c e of e t l l tr ci taste in arelitteat.lral ernbeilkh ine pt, for: wq l C itil , illustrious Ptrsonag e 'has ithio' b ee n co re[rFir k • - 7` . HARRCnti .SCI-10-6L.--to preve nt the t C ure c - arviated to Rive UneMineSS . to pers° n ! rou re ne4eekiiili l th fri e l Sehim!, we are aoth(oi sed i l l i e ctte rt; orn The oniforn;ty (evinces the : 30 the jsftblic, that tilt , t, latetransie,at distorb,:nce ` Go row. is entirely at an end , .tad t h a t the : ywqg c o f qemen Lave returnea a; usual to tli_? dit;c h ` t -their duty. Lv of Sir ". ~,,,a.,, na c e n kei t i h z L , . - BIRTHS. . 1 -: St o Y 3r ! , 30 13 f a h rt. ult. of at c Cr: I, t : th:l. ou , o it Daughter. On Monday the pst ult. at the Rev.. Charie A --- 0 1 $ Lynn, Norfolk, the Lady of Edward Ati4oll, I- 6 q . liaughter. , , , . , i , if''' . Ou Saiurday, at Vintners' Hall, tho Lady of Charles.. tin, Esq 7 of a Daughter. . . . re 4, ~- CE Sunday last - , the Lady of j. H. Jutting, Esq. 0` Lan}, Gra still-horn child. 3 • '' s°4ld O 1 ' n the 74 hst. at Cheltenl'am, t-4, 1 - s. Busch, , ......-. ........ . . . _ . ' . . ..AIARR I Li O. .r' ' : . f s 'ci .f 6 On Thursda y LISV, at Exeter, r. ,G.. Llopki' )s ' ,"' . • MO. Mrs. 'Evans; of that City. , , , to • , ~ Lately', At . Edinburgh, John A hercrOirtbie; -I : s( lj a w, - L '' - i . . • Agnes . Wardlaw, daughter of the late David diil . " .' ' of Nethethe,rh. :. • • ~- - •• • • r. , ,e Glogl . 0 . A few days ago, M. o, M foseph Taylor, Alero.l,lr' i . gotv, to iheiroungesnlatighter of Dc.inald i'd.aftli-" ci , ' , .Cara._. - ' . . __-..••• DIAD. ' • ter. ( () ,• t l ll'i' . !s .. i' l lt ) l n lr ti r4: d r ; l '-; : l ls a s r: ' at a h t is il h i- O o h : j o u :r e E a t a s p t e il a t • 1 I::eerP)ll.'i vr f' dt ork , 00, . Esti. Afr• W i6# st: ; i l L•-; .` 2 : l o m t e l3 nr: ( o , : ci n .: i s u r g:,, ce E t r . lith, , the eldest dattgi:ter_ c:: , ._ .; - t : a • tII 4 Late' , tv; ',, 4 - • ~ ! nris, of an oppression ',n ti' '- " • .' , i 1,1(, 66th year of her age, th,:::),r,.:ilu:::!ic:i 1 : i•, • ' . " ' ~.'.iii6 '-') . t•A;l.T.sie'sclay: srerinigin, ;Mi. -r . 1 ,4,4„ 1 ' , „ id, (,;.• •Ps- " rui c , r, Ina,,,Redbriq,e, (mu et the Ver , !ezers, of the I"7''' 1-hillipilire.. ' cf lic , r-Ittdi, or a fever,' ia !*, !Th -3.. Thcials Bi".:r-l• ,i, kuyal PlAvy, ~ , 611 Qt .0 ', • , 7,i, !':;,,1 ,' “./,-.-It' i ' r iei:ILI 4 tc,w 0,..-.. 4,,u,. at . ~. ~- :•.. i-...i . c,, , iLf ,,,, '',,c" f)urz.ll tlitclo,h`til' 6..;- . „ ~. . :.,..:. il ~,- ~ ..e,.1.11,, E , 4 . " I c '' . in Wintineso;r, CoL , ,:. :r,.:,.C.1 ' F ' 1')(") 1 111 r 4 1111 : - J C Y C) '' ' . 1; c' ' ri" , ' '"' ' , ''.i - trt:v, at ilii !louse A b'''''' '' ' . l.-14 : . 1, ' LarCiSr; at : Cast laaam, :, ~... iirant dat-ghter u , r 'fctilp,le, I:: sq, 'fl'' °' Ots i4onday. the - :3lst nit, it ; DlooroFhur•sql' ar- ' , filo, dbrc, eidestssop, of li,uglas .I..ovrd,iy, ,f:sq • A :eytt days E:go, at ‘Vpoditt.iuse, near C3birconlash'ci",e,r ')/ Clr.r.ry of Limericif - , ;ri 4 e L 72 Y•ears, Mrs. flour;,.;kur,. r b t;/ ,ty" -. % the late a l at fe e v : , Vi i r l;), l? r inie fi l e l-i c, o i :::if i ti : , t; :i ur t zeillyiejilz,nei,icifl)::.,i,ind,t(-5,,),, ,5,1• • Ri,char4 Eicul!4'an, aged 2: years. . ri i‘lo''''' Mr. 1::•,,,,ve 4 Lately, at ;:qtrcitt) 3 Mill, W., -, vickshirc, at the advanced age of'B6 : he was •att,:ndorl to .'' . .. - ti c , i e,.l I three prothers and one sister„ . bvilo•:e•unitetesg cs.A" '" 368 years.. ' E,t .7 ; 4),6 PRICE 0 TOC KS YEsTzar:Ay. India Stogk, India Bond, 6s, 75.. pr. • E'xclioquer 13ills, 6s. is . Orri fl i u m, par , pr. nt ,7 e • I mp erial 3 per ce. - 605 Dit,o Ann. 7f r 7 670 3 l ., Cons. tor i ~f