The Sun. — London, England, 1808-06-24 00:00:00

3dOptett 10 relieve anotller great 'interest, whi,'h relief might be grante.d . ‘Vithout (he least pre judice to anyother interest in the country. &sides; the present measure had in view the general inte rests Of the ,community at large and that 'he con ceived tone the grounclupon I,t'llieh a wise and pro vident Legislature would always proceed. After ad verting to the general situation of the country, as afre6ed froni'vithoiit atid within, he considered the present Bill as most forcibly presied on the adoption of the House..... Under these impressions it :should have his most decided support. The question that the. Bill be read a second time was then agreed to, and the Bill was ordered to be committed to-morrow.—Adjourned. r • HOUSE OVCOMMONS. THURSDAY, JUNE 23. A Message from the Lords, by the Deputy Usher of the-Black Rod, required the attendance of the noose •at their - Lordships' Bar, when the Royal Assent was given by Commission to several. Public A6ts; tot which seethe proceedings of the Lords. IVIASSEY's 'DIVORCE. The House went into a Committee on Massey's Divorce Bill, Mr. JANIRS GRAHAM In the Chair. Mr. FONRLANQUE, as Counsel for Mr. Massey, stated the facts of the marriage of that Gentleman with Miss Mary Anne Rosa Lewin, in 170, and the subsequent adtiltereus commerce of that Lady with the Marquis of Headfort. These leas, as well, as the legal service of notice at the residence of the Noble Marquis and the Lady, in York-place, Baker street ; the judgment on the trial of the action for - damages at Ennis, in the County of Clare, and.the payment of 10,0001. damages, were proved by se veral witnesses. The Bill was reported, read a third tirne, and passed. The Privately Stealing Bill was read a third time, and passed. . Mr. BARHAM deferred, till to-morrow, his in tended motion for same further measitres of relief to the West India Planters, in pnrsuance of the Re ports of the West India ComnTittee. A MeSsage from the Lords by the Masters in Chancery, declared their Lordships' assent. to the Pilots Bill :; the Cape' of 'Good 'Hope Trade Bill ; ' the Expiring Laws Bill ; the Bill for obtaining 'an . .Account of Fines levied under the General Defence Aft'. . Mr. Rosa informed the House, that his Majesty bad been,. ',waited on wi th the Address of the House respecting Vaccine inoculation, .and Wei • graCionsly pleased to say he would give directions accordingly. Ou the Motion for. going into a Committee on, the Reprisal , Bill, .• Sir C. POLE moved an instrhaioh 'to the; Com mittee to receive 4 Clause, to prevent Prize Agents from advancing Money to Superior Oißcers on ac count of Prizes, previous to :their general'distribu lion. • He spoke in high , terms of commendation of the late arrangement for the distributiOn of prize., money, made public by his . Majesty's Proclamation. The Clatise he propOsed'would give additional etre& to that proclamation, and would satisfy the Navy, in general of the attention paid to the interests of its men as well as its officers. , MAE stated, that since his appolutnient . to he Treasurer of the. Navy,-he had taken measures, , by enforcing the existing laws, to.' recover monies due from Prize Agents, and., to redress the com plaints of the Navy on this head. He had recovered several large sums from Agents in the West Indies in partictilar,, which) would otherwise never have • been paid. He was willing to give, farther trial to the enfercernent of the existing laws, and though he thought the measure proposed,by the Hon. Admiral. may be properly-made part of a future Bill on this subjca in the next Session, when the whele subjea should he., considered, and when what the existing laws could do Tto remedy the evils complained of should be fully tried. 'He deprecated . the introdue, ;ion of the Clause. in this Bill, : of which it could not properly. make part. • .After some explanation between Sir C. POLE and Mr. Rose, the motion was negatived. The Bill went through a Committee. The Report was re ceived, and the Bill ordered to be read a .third time to-morrow;. as was also aim Woollen Penalty 89s pension Bill, reported by Mr. Wharton, The De nial Prize Bill, the Three. per Cents, Annuity,Bill, Iti l l.;the Brazil Postage Bill were read a third time passed. . ' the motion fOr the third reading of the Coffee buty Bill, : Mr. litariamproposed, as a further relief to the West India Proprietors, that the operation of the ,A.a should commence on tile I,sth of August, in stead of the ,10th of Oct ober. Mr.. HosicissoN said it .was,,in justice to the retail dealers, he thoeght, right 'to allow theni till the loth of October to dispose o - f:i be stock on hand.--;- The erangettients of revenue besides regained 'this time. He 'wished it more praticable to make.the • reduction commence 'on the tath Augtist: But as that could not be done withoin many great inconve-' niences, • the 1,;i1) of ()Cipher wai tiC.c.d blob as the most accommodating to the interests concerned. • Mr. IkiLtarts . ,„ti. stated as a fa&, material for the'. consideration of his Majesty's Ministers; that three , tithes as much Ceffee Was smuggled as paid He was sure the Revenue would be benetitedliaead• of beipg injured, if the redualon. were Made to take: place trom the present day. On these grounds he supported . the Amendment. Mr.. Bsitnim also supported the Amendment. The 'Merchants were obliged to snspend their sales this measure should coinmence. the CH NcE,I,LqAt gf thdEXplarinart, in wishing to give all possible. relief by the ,present measure,, felt himself obliged to :attend to the representations 4.f . the retail dealers; who had. laid i 9 a stbek'under the high duties. The. interval till Inth Oaober was thereti* granted' to dispose of the . stock that had paid bleb duties. The sale; had been suspended only on account of the oncertninty - 61 the period at which the redu4ion to continence. When the time was once known to be fixed, the sale would proceed 'as Usual, .On these grounds he could nut coosent to allow the redu&ion to coinnience bdfor'e the loth of Ogober. . Sir C. dwelt, on the loss the retailers sillies by making the reduction cortiincuce' too , , ; 1,); sopr t o . rtc4 AwriLlipent,whicli r•Appmtoltiy (of bt.ii),(:, put, the Anictultneut lirS72 negutlyed, awl the 11A1 passed was aialso the Cof fee Excise Bill. :ARM ifA - Mr. Wannecc rose to the attention of di e House to „the: prodigal expenditure of the public moat" , tit t present system of clod, ing the army with-great coats. The Wi'r Office, instead of aiA ing-oti theprinciple*of open contraa, as reciinmended and otre-red by the, reasury; persisted in prieatecort traas, and the, consequence was, ..that though a . re dettien had taken place in the materiali of great etiats, no reduaion had taken place in the price. In the., year 1803, the Secretary at War (Mr. Yorke) consented to pay at the rate of I(is. (3.d. for each great coat, but stipulated that a rtdulion• should take place if the price of kersey should fall. Kersey was then at I 45., 6d. a yard. and since con ! tinuell. to fall till it came down to 6d. no re cluetion was made in the contracts till :tbe present year; nor would any have been made, if it had not been for the continued offers faced on the War office to furnish great coats at a less price than was aaually paid. He made a variety, of calculations on the prices at different periods, from Which he as sumed there was a loss to the public of 23,0001. . He adverted particularly to a tender made by Messrs.. Scott, eminent Army Clothiers, to fctriiish these Coats, in 1806, at 14s. 9d. ,which would atfOrd a saving of 2 t,OOOl. on every delivery. Not 'getting any answer, Messrs. Scot; looked for a share in the coutratt, as made by the War Office. They obtained it, and 'were paid at the rate of t (is. (id. This was an answer to any objet ion that could be made on the ground of supposed - inferiority in Messrs. Scott's cleathing, -On an intimation, frotn the Treasury BenSh that this took place during the late Admi nistration, Mr. Wardell said he was aware that no "blame attached for this part of the transaction to the Itigitt Honourable Gentlemen opposite, but he Was" influenced by no respea•to party in bringing for ward' question. In the present year . Messrs. Scott applied again to the Treasury. The answer was that the coats would be made the sub je& of open contra& No notice of open con. : traa 'was given, a close contra was made with 'Messrs. Pierce. Messrs. Scott again got a 'share, , for which they were paid at 14s, thpugh they were ready from the reduced price of kersey, 16 furnish • the whore quantity at 12s. Here was a.lossof above t 6,0001. to.the public, by the system of favouritism and private Contra& Mr, Pierce having interest not only to get the contraa, but. to fix the price. He 'cited a' letter from the Lords of the Treasury. to 'the Secretary at War,intinaating. that, the price of great coats may be reduced in proportion to the accelera-, tion of tie payment. He could not understand i what 'was meant by ,this, when the great coats were gene rally paid for within Six months: He ga . ve credit to the Lords.of, the Treasury, for theirCincere coin v cidenc,ei in. the recommendation of the Commander in Chief, to substitute open . for pritate centraas, if any alteration, should be made iii the present system. lie cotnmented on the other particulars froni the Letter of the Treasury, .riditiling the idea Of *a re . duetion proposed in the price of coats in the event of a fall of the price of cloth an tine ofpeace, and this too at a period when tnaonfaaurers were so much at a loss for a market as they were it present; H e de. premed a deference being paid by the Secretary at War to the present Commander in Chiefi'merely on the ground of his being the son of Our Gracious King ; and would allow of such a deference only in the event of its being proved to be usually paid. . fie cited a • letter from the Adjutant General to Mr: Harrison. one of the Secretaries of the Treasury, stating, that a Board of General Officers, to whom this Matter was referred, were of opinion with the Cottimander 'in Chief that no alteration' could with propriety be made in the present system Of supplying 'groat coats. He also cited a letter from Sir James Polteney, Se cretary at War, to Mr. Harrison, stating, that he had submitted to the Commander inChief, the Treasury Letter; recommending open contraa, afid that His Royal Highness was of "Opinion, that no alteration should be made in the present mode of supplying the, most essemialcomtbrt of a . soldier. A fear was expressed that open Cantraa would 4e . made die . means of forcing great coats' of inferi,"7nuality ; "hut this, Mr. Wardell contended,. could be 'guarded' against by. previous inspeaion. In order:to prevent degclencies ou extraordinary occasions of urgent ser vice, Messrs. Scott proposed that there should always be a 'supply of (1000 approved great coats, ready io be sent to any part of the world, according as. the exigencies of the ser v ice•Sho e ld requ ir e , He pro-' pesed, as the 'best remedy and the most applicable to. 'the .ease,- to transfer the `providing great coats from the War Office to tits Commissary-Ge neral, to whoSe department it properly belonged. He cited another letter from the TreasUry, .again press . - ing the propriety of supplyinff great coats by open contract, inti . gayqcredit ,to his Majesty-'s Ministers in insisting on this esonornic measure, in opposition to the great Influence by which they were resisted. The Secretary at War, in 1803; contraCted 'with Mr. Pierce to find great coats tor the army f at 16S. (id. each ;" Mr. Pierce immediately contracted with a slop 'seller of the riame of Di ,(att, who furnished him with themnt 139.-Xil. and 14s. . By this transaaion, the Public lost 30,0001. Bimaking the contrast an open:, and not a private'one, he was satisfied that the country would be very much benefitted, without any :Wit:Try .wbatOer accruing to the po)anChtof the Re giments. He entered into an enumeration of the savings that might be eflieaect on coats, hats, accou trements, &c. of the infantry, Which he estimated', .at above tor,oool. and and had no doubt that if the savings which, might be . made in the cavalry were added,' the sum -total would be doubled, fle•kneW Several Otficers, whnse.opiniou it was that the sac- , tug, if properly condueled, would umount to 400,0001.. He concluded by tneving, three Resolu tions to the following effect : " That it is the *won. of this. [louse, that by anintpro per adherence to the system of private ZnlitraCtS, great and unnecessary expericts had been incurred mid that the Trea sury Orders or the ph or Nov. 1807, and of the ioth. t•tuAry, aoli, directing the great coats the Army to be sop- Pried b.,. phblic contract, were highly proper. " That it appOrs highly expedient, that ih future all con tracts for the army-clothing should be open. " That a Committee be a pp o i nt e t t to exam i ne into the clothing of the ?truly, and to report to the Hoti4e .their C ,t pl.; 1600 thereon." The SteitETAit;t it VAR 'replied to• the obi;erva tion of the Him. G?mtemati. These who were wi.:ll acquainted With the I.voollen trade, 11;10 n eti hitrrthat the remained 2.tatiotiary trom Itt43 to the pr:;ieht time. .With ruspeN price for 1. , ,112,:it koats that had tiefti fixed in I eo.t, y, tji, tid. he culticl only s.3l', that aS int i‘J U;V.ivir sio?d, that • price had • not been fried without ritie deliberation, and a' consideration of: every cir eum:itance conneaed with the suhjea. A.. refercwe to the ot?inton of military Men, dnd uarticularly4o that t heCommanderin Chief, wasindispensible ittques , lions nature,•and consequently the infereintes of . the, Lion. GendeMah did not apply. When.the hits - Mess was referred to the Commander in Cbief, Ike communicated it to the Board of General Oth cers, who of - course were pertectly . disinieresied, and who, after due deliberation, declared their unanimous opinion,• an opinion in which, the Commander in Chief had concurred: The soldier's great coat was to last him for three years; was frequently. his only covering, apd it became therefore most items. sary, •that ttese coats should not be of an inferior quality. On this'principle the Board of General Officers and the Commander In Chief had objetied to any change in the system by which these coats had hitherto ,been furnished. The Secretary at War had no connexion whatever with the appoint ment of those who were to furnish , the clothing to the army. gvery Camel of a regiment seleetedo his . own army clothier. The War-office, therefore, could have no interest in the qirestion. It was not to be expeCted, that, the Treasury would suppose any orders of this nature limed by them upon this subject` were final, without consultation with the military authoritiec The Treasury had recomineuded a new sprepf, bat the Board of General Officers and the Commander in Chief were so strongly im pressed with what they conceived would be the in jury Which the Army would sustain fromm the change * , that the Treasury acquiesced. He did not think the least advantage would *True - to the public from taking the clothing out of the bands of the Colonels; although he was satisfied that (provided a tair coin pensation wire made to them) the Colonels would be much benefited,: and would be very batik to have the clothing removed from their hands into s those of the public. He wetild move. the previous question on the first Resolution. Mr..Wityrintisab commented With great severity on the extreme absurdity of the di e+= Ut our soldiers, and particularly that of the cavalry regiments. The enormous Muffs on their heads, and the whiskers on their faces were equally absurd and useless, His Honourable Friend had plainly proved that the sol dier had the same great coat put on his baCk_at 16s. 6d. which might be provided for him at 14i. ad. and even that, the same' identical . house had supplied at. 1..65. G(L the same coats. which they had professed themselves willing to supply at 14S. N. Of all . these statements Lbe Honourable Secretary had taken no notice, nor had he chosen to advert to the pur-. chafes that Mr. Pierce had made of a slop-seller..-- An open contraa was certainly infinitely preferable to $ private contract}. ;He thought that his Honour able Friend had completely 'substantiated his state ments, and that a Comthittee. ought to be appointed to investigate the subject. From the Made in which .the Committee of Finance were now proceeding, it was not likely„ were . the Chairman to live -to.the age of Methusalern, " that he 'would ever' have to re port 'on this subjeit. The SEcRETARY at WA,a explained. . General STUAItT defended the dress of some of the regiments of cavalry, 'which were on .the principle of the Gerlll3:lS for the outposts Lif — an army. It ap peared to him that it did not signify how thesoldiers were dressed, prOi4e4` they 'were. well 'disciplined, With resl)eo to the erothing of 'the army, he t:luught It would be in, rtous to the public to take it cut of t _ Mr. WHITBREAD explained: Mr. HusKissou observed; that the sulljea was nu, der diictission, and there Were arrangements making upon it. In the contrads for great coats wet.: already open, as -desired by the Hon. Gentleman. He thought it would be most absurd to go into a Committee on the other parts of the question, until after the Report ot Vie Commissioners. of Military Inquiry should be presented to the Hods.e. The Treasury had nothing more at heart than an open competition on all subjects, but on many it would be a tiended with considerable danger and inconvenience. Mr. Ftlt.Lcit concurred with the Hon. Gentleman (Mr: Whitbread) in.ridiculing the dress of same of our regiments, and especially the spdden Changes of regimentals, the 'expellee or 'which had compelled many Officers to quit their regiinetits, Adverting fin th&scantiness of clothing in some casts, he de clared that he had seen instances in eitich the dress of the soldiers of a regiment had been made so tight that. it had been burst by the sudden contraction oc casioned by u shower of rain ; and the poor fellows were nothing but their shirts to coveta'part of their bodies, which he would not. name. On the whole, hoWever, he believed that the clothing was conducted on a very equitable principle. After a fewttords in explanation, Mr. WARpELI. withdrew his NiLtioli. MR. PALMER. The, Resolution .of the 14th of June, respeaing Mr. Palmer, having been read, The. CII4NCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER Jose to .move for a separate Bill on that Resolution, instead of allowing it to form a part of the general Appro— priation Bill. He would state his reasons for malt ing this proposition, of which he had given due no tice; ,that it. might not appear,to be a sudden mea sure. The ordinary course of the House wai to put all the grants of the year into.the.Appropriation Bill ; but in adopting the course which he was about to recommend, the House would not et in an un- , parliamentary or an unprecedented manner. If there ever was a.ease in which the ordinary course should he deviated from, it was the present, fur very strong reasonS, which he would distinctly shew. With respea to the precedents on this subjed, would submit_ to the House a great variety of them. • In the iirst place he.would state a number of cases of grants voted in the Committee of Supply to private individuals, with conditions annexed to them, some of which had been carried into riled , solely by a se., i - trate 13111, - while others had been incorporated into the Appropriation AO. The tint that he v.'ould mention was a' voe. of the House in a Commit tee .of Supply, on tbe loth of April, 17?9, of 50001. to Mis. Johanna Steele, on dm conditiuo that she would with. a#l conveMent speed make discovery of her remedy for curing the stone; tin, vuie wai car ried into eff,,et by a separate Bitl i and (lid not appear it! the'Applo,inaiiou Act, - Another vote was on the tt It of Jatioary, 173 t , of 14,0001; to Sir Tilomas .ai a rei.v.rnpenee for the.intl - gda.tion of or. ganized bilk into tLis Country, on the euedition that lie should, nrodOce the otodels of his mills. Note c.-..as ca; riei inte mile::.` li' sejarste.Bl;;; 41It•,; did make its appeaninee in the Appr.oprnitiou 50001. had been voted in a committee-of SopplV,, tlie.fainily of Mr. Hiltrison, fur ails tioae-pieee, the contlitioa that lit; Executors should, as speedily as possible, explain its coustruZtion.. Thi3 yoke Wa carried iiiro effed by a separate Bill, and wa = s incorporated ha the Appropriation Wet. :3`.i001.. had beep voted in. a Committee pf tiff; ,cov t - cOi*npo• • • sition of a powder for destroying insects.: 1:11i; was carried into eifed by a. separate Bill, whit[! Was lost in the Lords and it did not appear io the AP , proprialion Aft. Two. or three )ears afterwards Mr. Phillips renewed his app:ication, and the liow ,o • of Commons in. a 'Connitttee of Supply voted, Will 10001. This vote was carried into efreel in a serh• rate Biel, which Bill was also lost in 'the [louse of Lords; and it did not appear in the Appropriation A&. Thus it appeared that out of these rive ca-rei the mouse adopted ;one course in three itistai...e.;„ ito4; another course in the rentainin , 4( tee. ITh.e slW e r variety of proceeding would appear upon alt nation of different grants that-had be(-11 public purposes. In some cages 'these vows h . act been carried into erred solely 'by sepaiiite BillS'; others they had been incorporated in the Approri ation A. For the construdiOn . and' i.oproycnierit of Westminster Bridge various sums had ii,-yen voted at different periods. 04k the, 13th of May„ `40,0-001;.- on the ,?.-4th both these cases the vents had been cal heti int6o . ' fed in separate Bills, and had nut appeared 1111[' ° Appropriation Act. 27th of J .1. ' , 7•P u ne, 4 25,0001.; in 1743, ..a."r 5,0001. is i 74 - ,4., e2„•00 1 ., which had been carrtcd into efle , :t by sep.iiate but had at,o been ineuri)urated into the 4iiP () P lll. - ation Act. It was evideot, therefore, , tl)atnatt l 4 44l instances, all-relating to lhe s,anie ttit ,14 0 -1": had teen hitlueeced jolely convenietive.,':Al, l ; . were variptts' -other sioriiar • erant. , „ of 17;6, .1,),C)(jo, streets of , W estminster; - ail Zl3y, 40,000 i: for repairing I\ollll - Ord w"t` i '"- • votes were. carried two cdect by O:L'-atj 13 1!15, although' they. appeared iu the. A a rOplaatiQn: Ads.' In 1759, 10,0001. for Mdloid• I Wt.-1i 0 0 the gth - bf May, 1759; ,various SUMS OS conit-,wP'"; tion for.tlle purchase of inds at 'Pertstuouila. 30 4 15Yruduth on the tad of iVitiel); 176 c, 500(4.4i! paving Westminster, and Ott" the 14th of AP,Ot 1767, 20001. addaional f o r the same purpose. ~4% • • these votes were carried into,effeet by separaw And did not appear in the Approprial'•ou 4et• these various cakes it was clear that not only an Ne t ' • vate but on publice grants - the<House had abs'O''. exercised its own option on the mad; of . 0•01;ce7 ing. .But . there was , another class tit cllbei 1 11011 A • nearly resembling that under consideration. '.'bets were the grants ‘vhien had been made without a n d, condition atinexed. On the '3d at Decettllvr , 110 4 tfivol. dd. had been voted in a coenlii"" ' Supply as due to Captain . Jaines Roach, for the Ar , rears 'of rent of forfeited estates in lielitad , gr'l ute r ,to him by Act of Parliament. This v° l ° te tied into effed by -a separate Bill, and pear in the Appropriation Mt. ' 01) January, 1752, 112,1431, .was voted to tile African a Coi-way cotopensation for- the-lasi -ut their chartered lands. This" vote had :been • earr;.cd into effeet by scPrate Bill, and . was tiotltdid not ae i icerneralca into the Appropriation Att. But one of the 111 0 1 martial cases 'to which the House ought to, :We t+ • was. that of Rye Harbour, .0n the vfith bruary, 1745, .the Committee of Supply vote" a grant to.his,Majesty 2:3,2fi01: out of time Siiillrz; Eland, to enable the Commissioners of Rye Pub"! to complete the works. The Appropriation was sdbseqpernly brouglit into the House', I 't grant was not t"..teltided in it; and the CoMtirittett l u io Po u ti r, f l o t r ot t l il t e h p -t u a rp tl o i se ut u 'A t %1 aUow;131:i.11 for Itj , e Harbour to be made the .stibig'ct ": rata e 8.11. Another.ca..e had occiarr,el in 177 Y, -iK a giant u, on the Petitioe of Dr. Smith, as tor his In.ving atten.ed sick prw)oeis 10 Load" all' We. mil Ste . . That P:tition -lied—liven with - 4i al , * ceuitter Petition ! ref e r r ed to a Cuinori . .tee, made no Report. In the year 17e) • the r et; ' i f was renewed, a id on' the Report of a Cottawi t s', a Bi,l b. - owg it ;n and the ilotise ° ' Commons tear gra alit I vow, to Smillk 4 ," l ” cas B!livis never re4l.'titti frotn the Lords. w" possible, :dm: what Ire. h !Ll , stated, tu °Wend/ I ' l ' it %%lei. not perisctly competent to the [ loo se fq carry its vote into effect, either by a eiyarate "e Pr_ ty ins inserli i n l'h'e Xnprirpriahjoi), * O O ,, been siot;.l •on grounds not satth:Wtorf and though. he still refained his fortrier Ilion, it was not upon that b e , pr o posl the ' .course. The House had . a discretion, z+;' ( 4• mained to.be considered under what circtuD s 'a ac , i ; the HOLM: would be disposed to proceed by a t ee o . o rate Bill, or by including thegrant iti the Ad.' lino oth e r m o tiv e wo uld app 00 ly, I that would be mosyconvenient, wonid sirable. In ordinary.cast.s, where there wag 11( 11 1 K . ( :r t to be anyditlerenee of opinion elsewhere,' 'At'-'l. OO be proper to. insert the grant in the APPr°P r t o sa. _Att. But, it there should be any reason to suP5 l4 such a difference of opinion ,to exist. 10 th 4t tlittg' t :quartet, that woitldhegoodground for.taking cc iof out of the Appropriation Act. The vote pl lO O , upon an asumpnon of an agreement bets eu t i l iog Pitt and Mr. Palmer, and then assumed that t' flat had.happened to ,defeat such contract, Bill should be brought in to carry the cuetrat,.lvi, effea. That House knew that the other 1 1 9.a.'!". re the matter under their consideration, by havP' 4 .. 3 ,. • mintina, e . eived a Message from it, requiring a , it , se d non of the evidence Upon which they . haa„P „l ,, a , r , the Bill for granting the annuity .to Mr• r y .;„,,,,, ler, Having, by sending up that Bin to the °tl. eirro given it an opportunity . - of exercising Y•• strained judgment upon one aot, 1119'; they should : net, thy insertipg this , titt Appropriation, Bill, reduce the other tiquse, alternative of either acceding to a grant, 01 , it :disapproved, or, of rejecting the apPr." , f ) !, 4 1 .1 . :. part of the Supplies of the year. TI 111 : 1 ,11; i', , noniable Gentleman then ,elunted- the 3 1 . 1 , , - to t : , of Mr. Hatsel, • VOl.lll, pac'e io s, Ar.'• - tacking one measure to another Act tur:.p to forcing another her hianch.of pi ll to it, was highly irregular. awl breach • ku 4 ' 4/ ' tuss %% I to ~,, tice of Paltament ; but that to ledge that the part so tacked was disagree bleat other bragcla.of the Leg,i4l4tuN; etas btOly oa ' P. thel:egislaturei the