The Sun. — London, England, 1836-04-18 00:00:00

of preventing an open breach, of averting those sallies of impatient ignorance or factious violence, which are otherwise inevitable at the approaching debate, that this new system of preparatory private lectures by the most eminent professors of Toryism, under the mmediate inspection of the Chancellor of Oxford, have been got up. It is with the highest satisfaction we feel enabled to state, and that from an authority entitled to the fullest credit, that the plan adopted has hitherto proved a signal failure, and that the differences among those men whose sole bond of union is their common hatred of improvement, are at this moment, sofar as the Irish Municipal Bill is concerned, as irreconcileable as ever. It is known that the meeting at Strathfieldsaye during the recess was eminently dis cordant, and that a second held at Apsley House on Tuesday last rather widened the breach. It was then supposed that matters might be more satisfactorily ar ranged in a less numerous assemblage, and accordingly a third conclave was summoned for Wednesday. We understand the number of Peers present at this last meeting did not exceed nine, none of those who had been refractory upon the two former occasions were invited to this select committee ; but two of the nine had been delegated in the interim to wheedle the mutineers into at least an appearance of ac quiescence. Lords Wharncliffe and Roslyn are mentioned as the delegates employed on this delicate, and, as it proved, impracticable mission. The insu bordinates obstinately refused all compromise, and the two noble Missionaries were obliged to report their failure to the Select Committee. Under these circum stances, the third rehearsal has ended as abortively as the two former. A fourth is announced to be in con templation, but this is rather doubtful, as the manager has been heard to say, that " as they (meaning the accusants) will neither lead nor drive, they may go to the Devil their own way ;" and thus stands matters at present. Since writing the above, which ought to have appeared on Saturday morning, if space had sufficed for it, we have learned that the refractory Peers have, though with much grumbling, consented f-o be guided by their more wary leaders. Lord Lynd hurst is the General-in-Chief upon the occasion, and the amendment of Lord F. Egerton, in the House of Commons, will be the ground-work of the drama. God speed the Lords in their work of national regeneration. —Morning Advertiser. The Bill of Mr. D. O'Connell, for covering Ireland with schools of rebellious agitation, each having for its professor the resident Popish priest, comes on in the House of Lords this evening. That the Peers of the realm will " do their duty" by the cause of civil and religious freedom, by the members of the Protestant reformed church, by the established rights of pro perty, by the just dominion of the British Crown, by the integrity of the yet united empire, and by the lawful security and peaceful enjoyment of house and home, of life and limb, now menaced by and expesed to a system of barbarous and interminable outrage against every loyal subject of his Majesty throughout Ire land, we have not the shadow of a doubt. The Municipal Bill for Ireland, as framed by Mr. O'Connell, and at his dictation introduced to the House of Commons by the Irish Ronan Catholic Attorney-General, Ologhlen, on the 29th of Fe bruary, will never be sanctioned by the House of Lords, or receive the Royal assent of King Willtatn. Tire Bill, as it left the [louse of Commons on the 28th March,,though after some partial and comparativel,- !,12,ht amendments, will never pass into an Act of Pal liannuit through the concurrence of the House of Lords. The Bill will be read a second time to-night, hut in Committee it will be placed upon that footing which, on the ith of March, was recommended by so much accurate reasoning, and so much temperate but powerful persuasion, on the part of Lord Francis Egerton, when his Lordship moved that " the Corn mittee might be enabled to make provision for the abo lition of municipal corporations in Ireland, and for such arrangements as might be necessary, on their abolition, for securing the efficient and impartial admi ntstration, and the peace and good government, of cities and towns in Ireland." Here we find a perfect agreement between the preliminary principles of the Whig-Radical Bill and the motion of Lord Francis Egerton, with, however, the striking and characteristic q ualification that the Noble Lord, in confirming thus much of the Ministerial measure, honestly avowed the purpose, which the Ministers hypocritically disguised —viz., the complete abolition of the existing Protest ant corporations throughout :Ireland. The Noble Lord, or the Conservatives who voted with piin g would not lend themselves to the fraudulent pretence, that the corporations of Ireland were to be " continued" by a transfer of their rights and privileges to a hostile, re vengeful, and implacable enemy ; by his instruc tion to the Committee accepted the proposal, which went infallibly, though not avowedly, to their abolition ; and only averted that con sequence of the scheme which built a Popish and insurrectionary despotism on their ruins. We are sa tisfied, and we rejoice in the anticipation, that the con stitutional safeguards then rejected by the motley ma jority of the House of Commons will be restored by the wisdom of the Upper House of Parliament ; and that, on going back again to the same House of Con", mons, the Municipal Bill, purged of its demagogue and anti-British character, will be thankfully received as a Godsend by the very Ministers who paid their mean court to O'Connell by giving it, as framed ori ginally, their make-believe support, but who would never have dared to bring forward a machinery so de structive without a moral assurance of their own inca pacity to force it through the Legislature. On the abject cowardice of such a manoeuvre—on its ignoble treachery—on its profound and ineffable disregard of all truth and principle, we shall not take the trouble to expatiate, because the Whig portion of the criminals are not free agents in the choice of their own means, the one great and paramount end being acknowledged—namely, that of maintaining themselves in office, and keeping the Conservatives out. Looking to the practical operation of this measure, as first submitted to Parliament, and as Lord Melbourne will this day have the humiliating task of presenting it to the House of Lords, we shall just repeat our original charge against the Government— to wit, that their Irish Municipal Bill affects to be a bill founded on, and enforcing, the " same principles" of " popular controul" and " equal justice" as the English Bill of Corporate Reform. Popular con trol means control " by the people. But this mea sure establishes no such thing. The control it pro vides is over the people, and against the conscious in terests and free enjoyments of the " people:' It makes the lower order of Irish R oman Catholics the simu lated holders and depositaries of a power which they are not suffered to wield according to their own judg ments. It makes them blind and helpless instruments of designs which they do not share. It devotes and sa crifices them to the plottings of a priesthood, of which they are the slaves, the dupes, and victims. If there was a just outcry in this country against those fictions of successive centuries, the boroughs returning mem bers to Parliament which assumed the name of popu lar constituencies, but in truth were nothing better than s worn servants of their respective proprietors, what difficulty is there in understanding with regard to Ire land a similar contrast between words and things ; or the existence of a fact made so clear by volumes of multifarious evidence, that every parish in that island, as respects its Popish inhabitants, is a close bo rough, under the tyranny of Maynooth, and sternly ruled by the parish priest or his " coadjutor." Who now disputes the reality of this representation ? Who, after the disclosures which have been made before Com mittees of Parliament, will henceforth have the hardi hood to deny, that whatever we give to the peasant or small occupant of towns for lawful purpos es, will be turned by the priest to purposes, lawful or unlawful , as may suit his pleasure ? " Ireland," quoth one of these ap os tl es of sedition, " Ireland was once Catho lic, and she shall be Catholic again." " The bloody landlords, upstarts of yesterday, shall soon be forced to uroduce their title s to the lands they wrested from our forefathers," says another. a h "He that votes against i . 5 religion, " exclaims third, thereby meaning against themandate of his priest, " s h a llb e punished both here • and: hereafter ! Why, then, w e as k , are these men rigl itful trustees of national liberty for Ireland, or fitti'xig directors o f the mode in w hich , or of the o bj ec t for which, elective franchises and corporate powers shall be exercised ? W hen M r. Daniel O'C onne ll i s in a humour to fabricate false imp ress i ons a bout Popery, as i t works in practice, he makes no bones of telling Englishmen that the Pope him self has no concern with the affairs of temporal politics. Over and over he has declared, that if the Pope were to meddle with the political opinions of English or Irish Roman Catholics—if he were to in vade this country, for instance, or attempt to shake the lawful dominion of the King, he, the devout Agi tator, would be the first to wage war upon his Holi ness ; indeed, to the best of our recollection, parodying Cromwell, he went still further, and the conscientious Daniel actually pledged himself in such a case to shoot the Pope ! Yet we never heard, that in proof of his sincerity, this enthusiastic friend to religious liberty has on any occasion attempted to reprobate, or ever so mildly to rebuke, the most turbulent priest of an Irish congregation, for intruding upon the politicalfree agency of his parishioners, let him threaten, bully, abuse, coerce then as he might, and thus committing that very political transgression for which Mr. Daniel O'Connell would make us believe that he would hold the Pope himself to be a criminal, and would blow his Holiness's brains out ! But, save in the article of rent, words and things with Mr. O'Connell are very different matters. As for the " equal justice" with which Ministers as sure us this measure is fraught, even to overflowing, because it boasts of establishing a like qualification for all municipal voters, here again the mask has been longs ago pulled off, and the country been disabused of the deceit intended by a misap plication of terms. If one certain class, and one exclusive sect, be as plainly denoted by a given qualification as the number of pounds sterling enu merated under it—if it be fact, a fact unquestion able, that the great majority of 5/. householders do constitute the great majority of electors, and do them selves consist of Roman Catholics, and are, as unedu cated and ignorant Roman Catholics, under the im plicit guidance of their priests, is it not self-evident that the hollow semblance of " equality" is thus used as a cloak to hide the want of the essence of equality, and that the nominal extension of the franchise to the whole community of 5/. householders is, in reality, a limitation of it to the priest alone, all whose exertions, open and secret, are, by the mere spirit of his church, dedicated, not to the maintenance of equal rights b.:— tween Protestant and Catholic, but to the subversion of every Protestant privilege or immunity, and to the erection of Popish sway upon its overthrow. But there is another test likewise of the truth or falsehood of the virtues ascribed to this municipal re volution, as a source of comfort or advantage to the better class of Roman Catholics themselves. If it he really a substantial boon to that body, it is one of whose value we must suppose themselves to be COP - sciou s. It is one which they must naturally be desirous of enjoying. Then, how stands the fact ? We refer our readers to the letter of a correspondent from Clonmel, who knows somewhat more upon this sub ject than Lord John Russell has had any means of Laming, or than Mr. Daniel O'Connell might be wil ling, to confess. It appears from this authority, which we know to be respectable, that even the act of George IV., for paving, lighting, cleans ing, which was painted by the Roman Ca tholic; Attorney-General, O'Logiden, as not only an innocent, but a most beneficial measure, has been used by the turbulent and] vulgar banal of agitators as an engine of exclusion, of annoyance, and oppression towards the more decent inhabitants o! . Clonmel. It appears that the respectable inhabitant-, have been sot aside by the 5/. electors—that the great majority of commissioners are O'Connellites---that even in the dress appointed for constables and watch men, the cloven foot of disaffection has shown itself be a change in the facings of these officers livery, from red, the colour, to green, which is al• ways that of Irish rebellion ! It is emphaticaliv stated, that the " respectable Roman Catholic in habitants of Clonmel are already quite as wear; of the tyranous system of the agitation as the Quakers or Protestants have ever been ;" and some industrious shopkeepers of the former (Roman Catho lic) creed " have assured" our correspondent, that • " they would hail the adoption of Sir Robert Peel's plan (of Municipal Reform) as a positive blessing." Here, then, arc data on which the Peers of the em pire may, with safety and prudence, proceed. They will he bellowed at, of course, and yelled at, by the O'Connell ruffians, and abused for contemning the rights of the "people of Ireland," meaning those fac tious vagabonds by whom the peace of Ireland is eternally disturbed. But Lords and Commons, and our Sovereign himself may depend upon it, that the interests of all good men, Catholic as well as Prote:,- tant, are bound up indissolubly in the peace and good older of Society, and the taste and right feelings of Roman Catholic and Protestant, supposing both to be independent and educated men, are equally shocked by the brutal means resorted to for pro motiit, the selfih, sordid, and profligate views of Mr. Daniel O'Connell and his Myrmidons.—Times. The first entry upon the " orders of the day," to be disposed of this evening by the House of Commons, is the Bill for consolidating the turnpike trusts of England, which is to he considered in Committee. It is very probable that many of our readers have scarcely heard even of the existence of this Bill, and yet it is one of great importance, both as regards local interests and general policy. It is, we believe, neither more nor less than a very enormous and pernicious job, which its managers are smuggling through the House in time quietest manner possible. It is another centralization project, to give patronage and power to the Govern ment in London, and to take away from the people in the country the management of their own affairs. It is a matter which, to say the least of it, requires expo sure ; and, cunning as its managers may think them selves in keeping it so quiet hitherto, it shall be exposed. It will then rest with the public to raise their voices against it, if they think, as we think, that it is under taken with other motives than the public good, and that it will operate (if it become law) to the public injury. This Bill (like many other Bills of the same family, which have appeared within the last two or three years) begins with the appointment of Commissioners. One of his Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State, the Postmaster-General, and the Chief Commissioner of Woods and Forests, are to be Commissioners ex officio ; and to these the Treasury is empowered to add six, for the purpose of carrying the Act into exe cution. They are to have the usual powers of sending for witnesses, examining them on oath, ordering their expenses to be paid, and so forth. Such " commis sioned" authorities are now made every Session by the score, and habit has reconciled us (though it ought not) to such practicse, of which the spirit of our Con stitution should make us very jealous. But this is but a small thing to the framers of such Bill as that be fore us, which proceeds to give power to the Com missioners to appoint a salaried Surveyor-General, and all other such salaried officers as they shall deem ne cessary. It also gives them power to delegate all or such part of their authority as they shall think fit to the Surveyor-General, and to notify such delegation, to which every man in England will be bound to give obedience in all matters and things relating to turn pike trusts, in whatever manner, in whatever places, and under whatever circumstances the Commission ers may be pleased to direct. This is the sort of En glish freedom which the centralization system affords. The Commissioners may declare so many turnpike trusts " as they may think fit," to be consolidated and united. They may from time to time, as " they shall see fit," declare any consolidation of turnpike trusts to be dissolved, or any particular trust to be separated from the consolidation ; and thereupon the said trusts shall be so dissolved or separated accordingly. And the Commissioners shall in every such case frame and make such orders " as they may think fit" for adapting the constitution and management of every such conso lidation to the altered state of the same. They may also make such orders and regulations for the maintenance a d managem enttrusts, aiid of the the e fu i t z u d r s n t p h i e ke roads re of,as e such consoli dateday tk fit ; and they are empowered to do the same with re spect to trusts which are not consolidated ; and they may rescind, amend, suspend, or alter the same from time to time, as they may think fit. They may also appoint all officers, fix their duties, and their salaries, continue them or dismiss them, and all as they shall think ft. It is, in short, utterly impossible to conceive any degree of absolute despotic authority in all matters now belonging to turnpike roads, or which may here after be superinduced upon their present concerns, which this Bill does not give to th ese Commissioners. THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY, APRIL 18, 1836. And this downright unquestionable despotism is to be exercised over the whole of England, by Government Commissioners fixed i n London, or their Surveyor, who may travel about the delegated tyrant of the public ways, which, indeed, can no longer with propriety be called public ways, so completely will nine Commis sioners, or one Surveyor, have them under absolute control. And is a monstrous project like this to slip through Parliament in silence, because they who are grasping at power, which no man or set of men in England ought to possess, have cunning enough to keep its insolently tyrannous provisions out of the public view ? What reason is there that the nobility and gen try, and occupiers of land throughout the country, should not, as heretofore, have in their own hands the manage ment of the roads in their respective neighbourhoods ? It may be said that many of the turnpike trusts have been ill managed—that many of them are heavily in debt. This may be very true ; and it may, also, be very true that measures should be taken for the better regu lation of these trusts ; but is that any reason that the business should be taken out of local hands altogether? Is that any reason that Commissioners sitting in Lon don shall take upon them to regulate every proceeding, and appoint every officer in turnpike trusts two or three hundred miles off? Are the local affairs, even to the putting of a barrow-full of stones on the road, in Corn wall or Cumberland, to be settled in Whitehall by Government Commissioners ? Surely, that is not ne cessary for all the amendment that is required ; surely the Government has no just claim under such a consti tution as ours, to interfere in such matters. What will be the consequence ? Why this, that every alte ration or repair of a road—every appointment of al district surveyor, or even of common overseers and labourers, will be made a party and political matter. Sycophancy to the Government will be made the price of every appointment—interest with the powers in Downing-street, will be the only means of accomplish ing any arrangement respecting the roads in any part of the kingdom. The addition to the local patronage of the Government will be a most dangerous exten sion of influence, and the immediate interference with the local authority of trustees will be galling and of-' fensive. There are a thousand details which might be pointed out of the vexation and injury of uniting concerns which have had different interests, arid arc in different circumstances, but these we must pass by, as subordinate to the tyrannical principles and poli tically dangerous tendencies of the Bill. It may be urged that the consolidation of the various trusts o: Middlesex has worked extremely well. We admit it ; but with this consolidation the Government has not,'and never had, anything to do. It was left to the present liberal Government to grasp at everything which can by possibility be made available for patron age. The Middlesex Consolidation Act was passed in the high Tory days of 1826 ; but not a particle of authority or patronage was vested in the Governmeht by that Bill. Neither does it follow that, because it is good policy to unite the several turnpike trusts of a small district like Middlesex, for the sake of uniformity of management, it is also good policy to unite all the trusts of the kingdom under one Government diree tion. Management may be too much extended, as well as too much divided. Uniformity may be desir able in a small county, and yet both pernicious and absurd in a whole kingdom. No fair analogy can therefore be allowed between the Parliamentary Com mission for the north roads of the Thames and the flagrant job now before Parliament for putting all the roads of the kingdom into the hands of Government Commissioners. If this attempt at tyranny be not resisted, we shall consider that the sense and spirit of English country gentlemen must be indeed at -a low ebb.—illorning Herald. The Irish Corporation Bill is this night to be dis cussed in the House of Lords upon the question of reading it a second time ; and we venture to anticipate that this question will be decided in the affirmative, inasmuch as we have reason to believe that their Lordships concur with a large majority of the House of Commons in thinking that the Corporations of Ireland are not capable of accomplishing, in the pre sent state of society in that country, th purposes for which they were originally instituted in a state of so ciety. entirely different from the present. But although the House of Lords agrees with that large majority of the House of Commons which has pronounced an opi nion in favour of the extinction of the existing Corpo rations of Ireland, it by no means follows that the House of Lords should therefore coincide with that small and insignificant majority of the House of Commons which has resolved to create Corpora tions of a character entirely new in the place of those which are about to be abolished. Upon the latter question, as upon the former, the House of Lords is bound to exercise an independent judgment ; and certainly the right and the duty of that noble assembly to judge independently is not less clear in the case in which it differs from the small and insig nificant majority than in that in which it gives validity by its sanction and concurrence to the decision of a large and powerful majority of the Lower House of Parliament. Upon the constitutional independence of the House of Lords, and upon the solemn obligation by which their Lordships stand bound to the country to assert and maintain that independence, it is not necessary for us to insist here. These points have been illustrated by our correspondent Zeta, in a letter which appears to-day, with a degree of clearness and force of which we will not mar the effect by any addi tional observations of our own. There never was a doubt, indeed, in the mind of any man who under stands or who values the British Constitution, as to the right and the duty of the House of Lords to reject altogether any Bill sent up to it from the Commons of which it cannot conscientiously ap prove, and still less can there be any doubt as to its right and duty to make such amendments in any measure so brought under its consideration as it may believe to be necessary or expedient. What amend ments the House of Lords will think it necessary or expedient to introduce into the Ministerial measure of Irish Corporation Reform, it would at the present mo ment be improper to predict with absolute confidence. It is highly improbable, however, that their Lord ships should be of opinion that any alterations less extensive than those which were proposed by the Con servative Members of the House of Commons, will be sufficient to render the Bill of Mr. O'Loghlen a beneficial or a reasonable measure. The most impor tant of these alterations went to transfer the powers and duties now exercised and discharged by Corporations in Ireland to the Executive Government ; to restore, in a word, to the Crown, on the extinction of the existing Corporations of Ireland, those functions of which th e Crown voluntarily divested itself when the Irish Cor porations were at first created, instead of erecting as th e Bill proposes, new corporations in lieu of the present, o f a character the most opposite, and with principles, feel ings, and objects the most repugnant and hostile to the present. It may be considered as quite certaina very the House of Lords will carry their amendments of the Bill to this extent at the least, and the slightest reflec tion will, we think, suffice to convince all the reason_ able part of mankind that if the House of Lord s occasion anything less than this, it would be guilty of did gross derilection of its duty. Why should the extine ton of the Protestant Corporations of Irela .a n n d y , the upon the i)d the ground that they do not now fulfil the purposes which they were instituted, he thought a fit for the erection of an equal number of Papist Corpo rations, without any, or, at least, without by to the purpose whatever ? Corporations, it is said, friends of the measure, have wrought evil in Ireland. Why, then, should those which are about to be de stroyed be replaced by others of a character more perverse arid malignant ? Is it pretended that the existence of such bodies is necessary good municipal government of cities and towns If so, let us ask how some of the greatest tow ns i n England have risen to their present condition of wealth and importance without the aid o f such s titutions ? Corporations were not o riginally in stituted either in Great Brit ain or Irelan d for the purpose of the internal gover nment of towns, or the administration of municipal affairs, but entirely or principally as defensive unions against the dangers ge _ nerally apprehended at that period from the attacks of some powerful oppressor, or the inroads of aggres s i ve turbulence from without. This remark applies pecu liarly to the Protestant Corporations of Ireland. But if the latter have outlived the object of their institu tion, or have not been found to fulfil it, and if, there- SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. ARRIVED AT LIVERPOOL, APRIL 16. ore, they are to be abolished, is it possible to imagine anything more perverse and absurd than to substitute Popish Corporations in their place ? Are the Roman Catholics of Ireland the parties in that country who have to dread the assaults of aggressive turbulence ? Do they live in every part of that country in the im mediate neighbourhood of tyrants and oppressors, against whose lawless power it is necessary for them to combine for the purpose of mutual protection and defence ? Have they been, of late, the in nocent and unoffending victims of lawless violence ? Let us not be misunderstood. We do not ask these questions in order to show from the answers which they must receive, if they be truly answered, that the Protestant Corporations in Ireland ought to be continued. The Protestant corporations, if we under stand the subject aright, are given up, not because their purpose i s b ecome needless, but because they are found out not to be the proper instruments for its accom plishment. With respect to the Roman Catholics, there is, however, no such purpose to be pursued. They need no charters of incorporation for their pro tection. They are the especial objects, not of the pro tection, for this they do not require, but of the favour of Government ; and they are so apparently because they are the only portion of the population of the country which habituates itself to outrage, which or ganizes turbulence, which conspires for the perpetra tion of oppression, rapine, and murder. Why give the defensive organization of corporations to a body which has nothing to fear from others, but is, on the contrary, the constant source of apprehen sion and alarm to all the rest of the community ? There is but one answer to this question. Cor porations are to be given to the Roman Catho lics of Ireland, because with this instrument in their hands they will become politically more powerful than they now are—because they lend the support of their political power to Mr. O'Connell—and because Mr. O'Connell gives the support of his political power to Lord Melbourne's Government. Our correspondent, already mentioned in the course of this article, gives, in a word, the true solution of the question, why Ro man Catholic corporations are to be instituted in Ire land. It is the O'Connell bribe for supporting Govern ment. It is part of the price of the votes of the tail. But, fortunately, the compact between the Government and Mr. O'Connell cannot be carried into full effect without the ratification of the House of Lords. And their Lordships like neither the buyers, nor the seller, nor the price, nor the commodity. And their ratifica tion will accordingly be withheld.—Morning Post. The Jersey, Picot, from Parabia ; Ellen Jenkinson, Lisbon; Amphitrite, Smyrna. ENTERED FOR LOADING, APRIL 16. The Sisters, Reid, for Leghorn ; Jumna, Titherinton Linton and Cmton ; the Mary Cummings, Thompson, Mira. michi ; Berwick, Candler, New York ; Hero, Tear, Peel Acceus, Grigson, Quebec ; Cleofrid, Scotland, St. Peters. burgh. CLEARED OUTWARDS, Arm. 16. The Herstelling, Smith, for Rotterdam ; Trio, White, Sin gapore ; Heywood, Jones, Canton ; the Solway, Southward, Newfoundland; M inley, Walsh, Newfoundland ; Glorat, Thomas, Brazils; W,•stmoreland, Harrison, Bahia; Provi dence, Hamburgh; Ellen Brooke, Redman, New Orleaut ; Hesperus, Macdowall, Demerara ; Quintin Leitch, Mackay, Quebec; Edward Thorn, Wylie, St. John's, New Brunswick ; Tallyho, Nicholson, Virginia; Enterprise, Elsineur; Eliza beth, Beckman, Elsineur; Dash, Hawkins, Constantinople; the Franc,•s Brown, Gibraltar ; Diadem, [larding, Hayti; the Donson, Boyes, New York ; Rose, Greaves, Newfoundland ; Carnileo, Hamilton, Newfoundland; Blake, Thompson, Bombay. SAILED. The South America, Waterman, for New York ; Wcnwick Hodge, for St. Thomas's ; Palinurus, Ashford, Jamaica ; Bel videre, Bailey, New New York; Ann, Thompson, St. Peters burgh ; Selina, Evans, Malta ; Norval, Hearkney, St. John's, New Brunswick ; Milo, Hodgson, Quebec ; Garland, Whit tleton, Pictou. &c. ; David Cannon, Broadloot, New Orleans ; Higginson, Gillespy, for Barbadoes; Montcalm, Chambers, Arichat ; Port Glasgow, Lindsey, St. John's, New Brunswick ; Admiral Benbow, Powdrell, Quebe ; Sir H. Douglas, Hunter, Quebec ; Henry, Jobling, Pucrwash ; Dalhousie Castle, Gill, Mobile ; Eleanor, Taylor, Miramichi ; Sir. A. Campbell, Bathurst; Carlton, Andrews, Bathurst ; Johanna, Elsineur. TELEGRAPHED. Wind. S.W.—Off Point Lynas, inward bound, the British Merchant, for New Orleans. EAST INDIA SHIPPING The Bland, Callan, from Bengal, off Liverpool—sailed 12th October, Madras 30, and St. Helena 22d February; Flinn, from Bengal and the Mauritius, in the Downs—sailed 27th November, Cape 27th January, and St. Helena I:th February ; Gilmore, from Bombay. off Portsmouth—sailed 25th October, and St. Helena 24th February ; Sandwich, from Muscat, in the Downs—sailed from St. Helena 20th February. ARRIVALS AT COLOMBO (CEYLON).—The Morley, from Bombay and Tenicherry, and was to sail sth January for London ; Colombo, December 10, and the Fairy Queen, December 19, from the Cape and London, and were to return to London the end of January. ARRIVALS AT CALCUTTA.—The Duke of Northumberland, October 26, from London and the Cape ; Resolution, October 28, from Padang; Victor, October 30, from Penang ; Indian, October 27, from Havre. DEPARTURES FROM CALCUTTA.—The Duke of Buccleuch, December 25, for Madras and London ; Spetis, December 21, for China; Lonach, December 27, for Bombay; Eliza, De cember 27, for London ; London, January 4, for London. DEPARTURES FROM SAUGUR.—The Fairlie, Dec. 25, for London ; the Earl of Clare, Dec. 28, for —; the Geor gian, Dec. 28, for London ; the Edward, Dec. 28, for ; the Hydroos, December 28, for Judda ; the Thetis, Dec. 28, for China ; the Fortitude, Dec. 2e, for Boston ; the Frances Warden, Dec. 28, for Judda. The Duke of Bedford cleard out at Calcutta Dec. 3, and was proceeding down the Hooghly Jan. 3, for London; the Robert Small was about leaving Jan. 3 ; the Herefordshire was to sail for London Jan. 10 ; the Cornwall, for London, Jan. 18 ; and the Euphrates, for Liverpool, Jan. 20. ARRIVAL AT TIE CAPE OF GOOD HOPE.—The Briton, Feb. 7, from St. Helena and London. - —.--..—..—... ARRIVALS Al' BATAVIA.—The Margaretha, from London ; the Z eno an d M onarc h , f rom Li verpoo l ; t h e Sophie, Decem ber 13, from Hamburgh. ARRIVALS AT BOMBAT.—The Theodosia, Dec. 15, and Medora, Dec. 17 from Liverpool. ARRIVAL AT MADRAS.--The Lady Flora, December 29, from London. MR. COURTS' PAINTING OF BOIS D'ANGLASSY AT TILE NATIONAL. CONVENTION.-This celebrated picture, which has excited so much attention on the Continent, is now on view in London. W e h ave paid it a visit, and were al most equally struck with the talent of the painter, and the horror of the scene he has represented. The subject of the picture is what is term e d th e i nvasion of the N a tional Conven tion, on the first of Prairial, in the third year of the French Republic, when the mob of Paris, armed with pikes, sabres, and muskets, forced their way into the Hall of the Conven tion, and committed the most enormous atrocities. The mo ment seized by the painter for representation, is that when the insurgents, after murdering the Deputy, General Ferand, who had opposed their advance, having placed his head on ft pole and marched with it round the Hall, advanced with to the President's chair, and held it up before him. At this moment Boissy d'Anglas (the President), stands up, takes off his hat, and bows with reverence before the head of the martyr of law and liberty. His mind appears by his counte nance to be almost the only one capable of sustaining a dig nified serenity in the midst of such a scene of horror. The other Deputies avert their eyes from beholding the reekinc , head of their murdered colleague, while the leaders of the mob, and the furies in the form of women by whom they are accompanied, gaze with delight on the exploit they have achieved. A negro insurgent has placed himself in the ros trum, where " grins horribly a ghastly smile," as he views the bleeding head. The picture contains upwards of 60 por traits of persons distinguished in the scenery, besides nu merous groups of male and female insurgents. The expres sion of countenance of many of the most prominent actors in the terrific exhibition, marks the highest order of talent in the painter. NEW PLANT.—CORREA IVIILNERII.—This beau tiful plant, which is between a speciosa and C. pulchelea, and which was exhibited at the Horticultural and Metropolitan Societies, is at length in the hands of the Lowes, Browns, H e nderson, and other principal nurserymen ; but the smallest plants are from three to six guineas, or about a guinea an inch. This reminds one of the noise made when Lee and Kennedy first let out the fuchsia. The total number of plants of the correa, small and great, in existence, is said to be thirty one. Fifty pounds have been offered for the seedling plant...— Paris Paper. AFFAIR OF HONOUR.--A hostile meeting took place on Wednesday, in a field near Wimbledon, between Captain F— and Mr. W—, relative to some slighting expression conceived to have been made use of by the latter, respecting the late " Hermit in London," and calculated to wound the feelings of Mrs. Kingston, the interesting and accomplished daughter of that gentleman. The distance be ing duly measured, Captain T—, second to the aggrieved, gave the word, and Captain H--'s ball whizzing past his antagonist, hi s a ggressor fired in the air; and upon a bri e f ex planation, r which ended the whole business , was proved to have originated in a misunderstanding, all parties declaring them selves to have been unqualified admirers and staunch friends of the late distinguished author. —Morniny Paper. Whether sincere or not, Canning spoke the truth when he said that a reform of the House of Commons must be followed by a corresponding change in the Lords. The neces sity of this change becomes every day more apparent. The democratic and the aristocratic branches of the Legislature are as ill paired as a living man would be were he encumbered with the weight and offensiveness of a dead one. —Hull Adv. CHANCERY COURT.-SATURDAY. BATE V. FOLEY. ----- In this case an injunction had been obtained to restrain the defendant from drawing out of the bank of the plaintiff at Stourbridge, a sum of 2,0001., which they claimed to re tain as a deposit to meet a demand of 1,2801., the balance of an account kept their house by the proprietors of the Bradley coal-mine. The plaintiffs had previously had their right to recover by an action at law, to which the defendant pleaded the statute of limitations : and although the jury found in their favour, the Court of King 's Bench, on a motion f or a new trial, came to the conclusion that the statute did bar the right of action. The plaintiffs then filed their bill, in which they sought to fix the persons to whose name the money stood in their books as trustees, who held the 2,0001. to liquidate their demand when the amount was ascertained. The Vice-Chancellor, on a motion to dissolve the injunction, was of opinion that the fact of the trust could not be established, and against the decision of his Honour refusing to continue the injunction the plaintiff now appealed. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL being heard in support of this appeal, and Mr. JACOB against it, The LORD-CHANCELLOR was of opinion that the deci sion of the Vice Chancellor must be affirmed, and the injunction dissolved. VICE-CHANCERY.SATURDAY. DAVIES V. BANKS. Sir C. WETHERELL moved to dissolve an injunction ob tained ex parte, restraining the Dean of Windsor from pre senting the Rev. Mr. Fletcher, or any other person, to the chapel of St. Leonard's, at Bilston, in Wolverhampton. The chapel of St. Leonard's is one of the few elective vicar ages, the right of presentation being in the householders of Bilston. By the bill it was alleged that upon a vacancy it was the duty of the chapel wardens to give notice of a new election, to take place in the chapel or adjacent school-house, upon which occasion the chapel-wardens were to act as re turning officers, and a separate roll of parchment, duly stamped, was to be provided for each candidate, upon which their respective electors should enter their names in their own handwriting with seals affixed. The roll which had the majority of signatures was then to be transmitted to the Dean, countersigned by the chapel-wardens, as the pre sentation. The present vacancy occurred last January. The Rev. Mr. Fisk, one of the plaintiffs, and one of the defendants, the Rev. Mr. Fletcher, were the candidates. The election took place, when Mr. Fletcher had 1,784 votes, and Mr. Fisk only 1,339. On the 12th of February the chapel-wardens, one of whom was the friend of Mr. Fisk and the other the father-in-law of Mr. Fletcher, made their report of the state of the poll in the form of a certi ficate to the Dean, declaring Mr. Fletcher to be duly elected, and this instrument with the polling-books, but without the signatures of the electors, were transmitted to the Dean of Windsor as his authority for admitting Mr. Fletcher. The three other plaintiffs beside Mr. Fisk were householders, who objected to the mode of election as a deviation from the ancient usage, and on their application the injunction had been awarded. aONOUR said quite enough had been stated to show that the Court ought not to interfere. The injunction must therefore be dissolved, with costs. KING'S BENCH.-SATURDAY. HOPKINS V. CROWE. Sir F. PoLLocx moved for a rule to show cause why the verdict for 51., given for the plaintiff in this case, should not be set aside, and a nonsuit entered. This was an action of trespass and false imprisonment. The plain tiff was a cabriolet driver, and the defendant was the son of the owner of the horse and cabriolet.—Rule refused. THE KING V. JOSEPH HUME, ESQ., M. P. Sir W. FOLLETT appeared on behalf Sir John Gibbon (who had been a magistrate for Middlesex for thirty-six years), to apply for a criminal information against the de fendant, for a libel punish?d by him in the Morning Chro nicle newspaper in January last. In consequence of some statement of Sir Peter Laurie the libel in question, which consisted of a letter, was inserted in the paper of the 25th of January : it was in fact a charge made by Mr. Hume on his own authority of corrupt conduct as a magistrate on the part of Sir John Gibbon, of which, if he was guilty, he ought to be removed from the magistracy. The letter in substance charged that a man had before voted for Mr. Hume, and was refused a license ; that Sir John Gibbon promised him that if he would vote for Mr. Wood he should have a license ; that he did in consequence obtain a license. That was the charge itself, and that charge was wholly without foundation. The Court would be asto nished to hear that that part which stated w hat took place in Mr. Hume's presence was wholly untrue. Mr. Hume corrected that part in a letter the next day, in which he stated that Sir John Gibbon was not present when the charge of using magisterial influence with a view to obtain votes was used. This second letter, however, did not deny or alter any part of the former statement, but left the whole charge as before.—The Court granted a rule. THE ICING V. CARPENTER. Sir W. FOLLETT obtained a similar rule in this case upon affidavits which he said stated facts similar to those dis closed in the last. THE KING v. THE LORDS COMMISSIONERS OP THE ADMIRALTY. Mr. JOHN JERVIS applied to the Court for a rule, calling on the Lords of the Admiralty to show cause why a man damus should not be issued to them, commanding them to issue their warrant to the Accountant-General of the Army Pay-office, directing him to pay the sum of 3941. to Mrs. Ricketts, that being the balance of arrears of half-pay due to Capt. Beavan, of whose estate she was the administratrix. Mr. Justice COLERIDGE asked whether a half-pay officer had such a legal right to his half-pay as could be enforced in a Court of Justice ? --- - —.—. ~.....,.... Mr. J. JERVIS., thought that he had while he remained on the half-pay list. Lord DENMAN said that the Court would not refuse the rule on account of the doubt which their Lordships enter tained ; but of course they could not grant it while they did entertain that doubt.—Judgment postponed. THE KING V. ALEXANDER. Mr. O'MALLEY renewed a motion which he made last term for a rule for a quo warranto to be directed to the defendant, calling on him to show by what authority he claimed to exercise the office of Alderman of the borough of Ipswich. The Court granted a rule. Mr. O'MALLEY then made similar applications with re spect to eighteen other defendants, and obtained similar rules. BAIL COURT. FLEMING V. WORLEY AND OTHERS. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, for the plaintiff, stated that this was an action to recover a compensation in damages for false imprisonment and a violent assault upon the wife of the plaintiff, who, the defendant gave out, was only his mis tress. Mrs. Fleming carried on business as a milliner in one part of a double house in Goodge-street, and the de fendants were pawnbrokers in the other, the house having one common entrance. The defendants wishing to get pos session of the whole, took advantage of the absence of Mrs. Fleming, and, on her returning home and entering her shop, Worley came in and endeavoured to drag her out, but finding himself unable to do, he went for the elder Cotton, his partner, and they then together forced her into the street. Not satisfied with this, they then called a po liceman, and having trumped up a charge of felony, gave her into custody, but the Magistrate scouted the charge of felony, and she was discharged. Mr. Justice WILLIAMS summed up, and the Jury feund for the plaintiff—Damages 301. COMMON PLEAS.-SATURDAY. GOLDSMIDT AND ANOTHER, ASSIGNEES OF HUSHFIELD AND WILKINSON, V. RAPHAEL AND ILLIDGE. This was an action brought by the plaintiffs against the defendants as sheriffs of London and Middlesex, for the re covery of the value of certain property belonging to the bankrupt Hushfield, taken by them in execution, and sub sequently sold, and the amount appropriated to the pay ment of the execution creditors. The case was tried during the London Sittings after Hilary Term last, and the find ing of the Jury was for the plaintiffs. Mr. ALEXANDER now moved, by permission of the CHIEF JUSTICE, before whom the case had been tried, for a rule to show cause either why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new suit entered for the defendants, or why the amount of the damages given for the plaintiff should not be reduced. Mr. Justice PARK asked whether the damages amounted to 20/. Mr. ALEXANDER replied that they exceeded 8001. Rule nisi granted. Several cases had to be postponed in consequence of the Counsel concerned in them being engaged in the other Courts. EXCHEQUER COURT.-SATURDAY. WATTS V. NVEALE. Mr. EVANS, on behalf of the plaintiff, applied to the Court for a rule calling on the defend ant to show cause why the verdi ct should not be set aside, and a new trial or dered. It was an act i on o f t r espass tried before Mr. Justice Coleridge at the last assizes at Radnor, when the Jury found for th e d e f en d a nt with .51. damages ; it being a question with them whether they s hould find .50/. or 5/. Mr. Watts, th e pl a i n tiff, purchased in 1826 the manor of Eastcombe, in Radnorshire, to which was attached the common of Newbridge. The defendant, in 1816, had in closed a portion of the common. Mr. Watts, in 1828, had a manor Court, and brought an ejectment against the de fendant, w h o pl ea ded to it, but subsequently withdrew his plea. H e then became alarmed at the consequences, and delivered up possession. Mr. Watts then added the inclo `sures to the farm of a tenant, and had no sooner done so than defendant broke into them, and forced the doors and locks and cut the gr a ss. This was the tre s p ass for whic the action was brought.—Rule granted. DAVENPORT v. DAVIS. This was an action to recover from the defendant, th e stakeholder in a wager, the sum of 131., deposited in his hands. It was tried at the last assizes at Liverpool before Lord Denman, when the Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff 101. damages. Leave, however, was g iven to th e Counsel for the defendant to move the f ull Court to son set aside this verdict, and enter a nonsuit. Mr. 'Wat accordingly applied this day for a rule calling on the plain" tiff to show cause why a nonsuit should n ot be en t e red, or the verdict set aside.—Rule granted. THE MARKETS. RKETS D RING LAST WEEK• . COUNTRY CORN MARKETS DUREN t., L""' • NOM Wheat. Barley. i Oats. Beam. ...... ----- !—.--- ....-----......----.. ~ Per Quarter. I. to s. s. to s. s. to S. . ~.. Carlisle . 48 27 '2 -- -- 5 ..... ... HI.X ham.................... 34 44 25 28 RA 96 M0rpeth........—.......... 40 45 2.! 23 18 22 34 . .,,,3 5 ...... Penrith —..........— 51 27 23 V i , ..... 96 Sheffield ...................... 59 35 24 -- .' -- .... Winchester ............. 39 52 29 31 20 22 42 44 --:, a d. Per Bushel. s.d. s.d. s. d. P. d. s. d. s.d. s.d. 1 , . d• 1 0 '0' Carmarthen...,.,,.. 48 50 27 30 14 2 0 00 0 0 6 00 ° Cowbridge .. 0 0 6 0 3 4 0 $3l 2 0 2 6 5 6 0 0 ° ° 0 0 Newcastle (Staff.) 60 6 9 3 6 401 30 34 50 53 p 0 0 0 Northallerton —.. 60 73 36 461 3 3 4 0 5 6 60 0 0 • 0 0 " Stone----....... 80 8 6 4 0 48 30 3 4 6 0 6, 6 0 0 0 0 ...—..... S w w a a r n w s e ic a k .... 80 90 3U 46 20 33 56 OOO 0 0 Per 8011. 8 0 Barnardiastle—.... 11 0 14 0 0 0 8 6 6 0 8 0 8 6 10 C 7 0, s 4 Durham --........ 10 0 120 70 83 49 il9 73 sl' 7 " 00 o Richmond —,—.. 11 0 13 080 86 5 0 74 90 9 6 6 " ,-, 0 Stockton —.... .. 11 6 12 6, 8 6 9 0 4 8 ±42±2._ t -2--- ---0 0 0 WAKEFIELD CORN MARKET. --April b 5 ig Wheat, Red, Norfolk and Sutlblk ..... —s. 365: to -,..,. fi ne '-'. . ....S 3t; 3 • to —s. fine 40s. -- Lin. and Cam. ----- Yorkshire —s 365. to —s. fine 4 . 5 .' —VO hite g ----- Foreign, Red —s. —s. to —s. one .. 4 . White --s, —s. to ----• • rine • - ...... Barley, Norfolk and Sutiblk . 96i. to 31s. tine ;No. -- Lincolnshire . ....... '2ss. to 2Ss. fine 50. Yorkshire Wold . 3ls. to 345. fine 31s. Foreign ...... • Beans, Old 37s. to 425. fine New Oats, Potato Poland Friezland and Sins,: Mewling Shelling Malt Rapeseed 341. o — s s e)736643:1.5at:0531--19146ti.11::--e--Ittt::°:4•72:::;l4B::::.ll)e)liec'efi62:rneSileell°&-li':-t: SCOTCH MARKETS. Wheat. Batley. Oats. o c ans * .. ( 2: 1 --- ---- ‘ "1"341. 36 to 40 '..71 4 t 025 17 to 21 to 11 -- j ,l to 3 % ) Aberdeen o 4 , Flerwick 3O 34 20 24 15 17 20 - 4 ..... •-• Coldstream Cupar (Fife - ,`", Dundee 4B 59 30 33 20 25 ,,,,"' .... ,-, Elgin Inverness 4O 44 30 35 20 26 32 ~, ,s . ' _.., - Kelso ........ - Kirkaldy 37 42 '23 31 20 23 45 ,`: Perth The size of the mea.sure varies throughout the coul ft,:)—• s. We harlia very rather quick. D INBURG small suppl: fH CORN ] y:of all kind MARKET. Is of Grain:t( —Ai rr- lal / .day, and th, First Second.— Third Oats. 2.95 4d. Wheat. Barley. 535. rd. 43s Od. 48 0 :O 0 40 0 30 0 I ....verage price of Wheat PRICES OF PROVISIONS, &( Beef, per lb. Os. stl. to 05.7(1. Freshßutter,. Mutton 0 6 0 8 Salt _ m p Veal 0 7 010 Ditto, per c% t. o Porkrl Lomb, per qr. 8 0 G O I G O 7 0 oEgagtSstria)ewridkr..):—... 164 ran., o L 8 0 Wheat Ditto 7 . Quarters Loaf U u 7 Barley Ditto Potatoes. 14114. ...... 0 5 0 0 1 EDINBURGH MEAL There was a middling supply of sales were rather brisk. Per Sack of 28J1b. Imp. First Oatmeal Second ditto, ~ Barleymeat 1 9 0 Peasemeal 1 6 0 Pot Itarlev—No. 1.1,e, cwt. 104.-2.1 P GLASGOW CORN A moderate business doing in t Wheat, per ‘2401b. s. d. s. d. British, old 230t0250 new tal 0 24 0 Canada, free 24 0 .24 0 ►rish Barley, per 3201 b English 26 0 29 0 Scottish 24 6 27 6 Irish prase. :;Ss. 31 0 3 . 2 0 41.75. 31 24 u 20 0 COVENT GAR. There was a moderate supply t was somewhat dull at nearly last les:d el". swig 37, 4 U , 4 U 01 ill , to 0 10 _ Is 9 9 • 0 fi 0 ~ S 0 9 0 0 7 1 g L MARKE r.--Aprd 12. o il tail Oatmeal at this day's auultet, d. to rotatnB (cwt.) 2 6 5 0 Cabbages, White (12) 0 0 0 0 Ditto Red 0 0 0 0 Per Stone 01 141 b. lropm 0 First Oatmeai ...... S I P 10 Second ditto . ...................... 0 1 ' 0 Parleymeal .......... h. Peasemeal .......................... 0 1 -- 123.-341,14 s .......... Ditto Savoy Endive 1 3 Horse itadish(hundle) 2 0 Rhubarb • 0 0 MA RKET.—April 13. Train ; little alteration in prices.,. d. Oats, per ...kW). 14 % ) 0 0 Irish ...................... 1 6 % '"2O 0 British .................. 170 Be2.ns, per '211011). „ 0 English .......... —"" al 0 IScottish ................ 1 6 Is 0 IPease, Scottish 15 o js 0 Oatmeal, per 144111).... 36 0 Flour, per .311113 ....... thrown 1 0 Celery 1 0 Carrots kl2bunches) 4 0 Turnips 1 0 Young Onions ColewortsorGreens 3 0 Leeks 1 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 1 6 u 0 20 3 6 4 0 1 6 For. Grapes (per lb.).— 0 10 '2 6 English, Forced 20 0 25 0 Filberts 0 8 1 0 IEN S MARKET. j 1 aturday' •cek,s - s ritarket and tae Vac's prices : ' Pine Apples (lb.) New Potatoes 2 0 3 0 , d• F . d. t° 0 8 Spinach (half-sieve) 6 6. 5 Apples 1 0 s v Pears Cabbage Lettuces 2 ~° I g 0 O n i ons 1 p) Sweet Oranges ( itio) ~. ;5 n Seville Oranges 8 o i g ~ Lemons 5 0 9 2 Asparagus Walnuts .... 1 0 I 6 French Beans IP. 6 g Span. Chesnuts (peck) 4 " 4 - French ditto I 0 6 0 4 0 Spanish Hazlenuts .... .1 , ; (1 a • ..... u French Walnuts " , 2 0 1 6 Brazilian Nut 5.......... .. 6 Sea Kail (punnet) ...... ( 0 ) 0 i t ) 6 Mushrooms - - • -• 0 3 .2 6 Small Salad Cos Lettuces (per score) e ° Itaddishes (12 hands) 0 3 . 0 6 WIC ° SETS OF PLATED DISH COVERS , . 6/ 400 STRONG SILVER EDGES, may be selected from °fNiorkin4 Patterns, price 201. the Set, at T. COX SAVOR„ ondorl• 01 Goldsmith, Silversmith, and Watchmaker, 4 7 , Cornhill,„"L'is, 16, The Set consists of one cover 20 inches diameter , one 14, and 12 inches. f suP eri° N. B. The SHOW-ROOM contains a large variety 0 List Silver-edged Plated Goods. A Pamphlet given gra tis, v?", oo ds, of Prices of Silver Spoons and Forks, Silver Plate, Plated Watches, Clocks, &c. ITH S On the 10th inst., the la d y of the . Rev. William AnareWg' fo Buckingham, of a daughter, still-born. Alt of Sir On the 13th inst., at Brighton, the lady S. T mr. Blorae6 T. of a son. v lark' On the 1 lth inst., in Hanger-lane, Tottenham, Airs. .• C son, of a daughter. On the 12th inst., in the Hampstead-road, the lady of the H. Stebbing, of a daughter. , ar s* On the 15th hist , at Maida-vale, the lady of M. P. 6411 ' 3- Esel ,of a son. . • alAr Pfr On the 14th inst., at Reading, the lady of the Rev. Francis of a daughter. On the 15th inst., at Uxbridge, the lady of R. of a daughter. E• A' On the 14th inst., in Upper Bdf 1 1 the lady of e on. -p ace, Chaplin, Esq., of a aug r r atiloi r ' On tl le 16th inst., at Charlton, Kent, the lady of J• . 1 . a l.'s 0 9 Esq., of Hallgreen, in the Kincardine,lNT•l3" °- county of • and heir. elle r ' Charles Cave On the 16th inst in ~ Nottingham-place, Mr. of a son. __.-------'----''' C. Walford, Esq., On the 15th inst. at IMARRIED . oyle HeurY li a a tid' e eicisres son oflltid Nichol', , Esq., of Portland-place, to Mall " an 'a 0. n dati d ghter of H. H. Oddie, Esq., of the same place' Colney, Herts. Eav iarj opfoOLwineenut.ht Lieutenant-Colonel Vicar r h - inst., at St. Marylebone Church, the Re r 'i ti ghte r ocfoGloauretleEen.s,Tc.ouFnittzygSerlijdo: t Ko. L iT o . u , i o sa f , T e u lt r i t t u g u h a far l ‘' get Thos. county Mayo. Coo On the 14th i ns t., a t St. Mary's, Newington , Mr.ndo, of Wel to Hannah, da ug ht er o f th e late Mr. Fred. Fardina worth, Surrey. Gilber t ' On the 13th inst., at St. Paul's, Hammersmith, J. At f the late , r acl- , of Clapham, to Catherine - Ann, eldest daughter 0 T. Francis, Esq., of the Middle-mall, Hammersmith. ,iumber On the 12th inst., at St. Mary's, Marylebone, Robert ri y sa c. Esq., of the H. E. I. C., Madras, to Louisa MarY Anne;., ° o , n C o mpany viving daughter of the late R. Davies, Esq., of the same ° ' Bengal Medical Establishment. E. F' On the 12th inst., at Olveston, Gloucestershire, the V. jobla Morgan, M.A. to Charlotte, third daughter of the late le ll ' Sibley, rector Of Walcot, Bath. ~: v oung e4 On the 14th inst., at St. Margaret's, Westminster, E"' 9 ' i' Cha r " son the late W. Reeve, Esq., of Leadenham, Lincolnshire' Fiadyer lotte Frances, daughter of William Wainewright, Esq' ' ° street, Westminster. _. Brat" On the 14th inst., at St. Pancras Church , Air. Thomas Gor dow o with, of Rugby, Warwickshire, to Miss Knight, f Upper strOneet, the 15th Gordon-squareat St. Dunstan's-in-the-West, - . Afr 1 1/ 1 inst., i Alt- -' Powell, jun., of Peckham, to Elizabeth , eldest daughter o Cooper, of Bromley-hill, Kent. On the 14th inst., at St. Pancras Church, Air' ton, to Miss Steel, daughter of Mr. Steel, of K.entish-trf.i; _ Ge orge. On the 14th inst., at St. George's Bloomsbury, W Itiial:tighter or Sadler Clack, Esq., of Eton, surgeon, to Marcia, eld es W. H. Acret, Esq., of Torrington-square. DIED. ,„, , rea eloPs a ged 31 On the 15th inst., in Grosvenor-street West, NI. 'illi_arfolliio P hilip eldest - Mary, wife of R. E. Cumberland, Esq.on of On the 14 th inst. , ag ed 16, Thomas John, c dig,wife Hardwick, Esq. , of Ru s sell-s q uare. ter, LY On the 12 th inst. , at Slyne House , near Larleas of R. G. Bradley , Esq. 7 5 C°l°Pel On the 13 th inst., at Amwell Bury, Herts, aged , Charles Brown. log est O h On the 14th inst., in Parliament-street, Frederick, Y° of C. Birch, Esq. ~ n a rt- Esq ,, 0. ..- On the Bth inst., Elizabeth, wife of A. Brooking', mouth, Commander, R.N. ~,„ C. WO' On the 10th inst., at Ditton Park, the lion. Henry NY • . second son of Lord Dunglas, aged 10 mon ths. ..., 0 ,ecb.stree" On the 14th inst., aged 72, Mr. Joseph Pearson, of ' Barbican. Wedg sr°l On the 15th inst., at Clapham, the infant son aO. ,a ~, Esq. 4 o f fat/ r d On the 11th inst., the Rev. David Ford, upward. _m e fo , years the Minister f the Independent Chapel, a t Long Eli' Suffolk. e d 7S, 1 On the 12th inst., at the Rectory, Havant, ilanct'd,vell fital: zabeth Alin,' Wale Mountain, formerly of Littl the era p r o es Essex, and widow the late Lord Bishop of Quebec, 11 0•? Ss4.' tant Prelate of that see. peter of O pa ri r t k l - ae str l e 3 e t t h , iluvsets.t,ml\lnasrierJ.ane, wife of G. Braincis:ecall, jpts% On the 13th inst., at. Southampton,.age Rainer, R.N., C. 8., Aide-de -Camp to his Majesty. of pt., London : Printed and Published by MTIRDO YOUN ,stivisf 112, Strand, at The Sun Office, Ne. 112, St rand,in the . of Middlesex.