The Sun. — London, England, 1810-05-19 00:00:00

15 3 Y s tetlo 44'0! [bat 1( TS 0111 ; 51:01-11,4 j;;SSI t • • ;dys I[l :r to; retrEo* — t hey {COLI C:. fur Tarpr of t 1 111111), ripte t IS 10‘i Se"' b e jeSS lOW t te" e they to° ,ot ) c l te cte' o . /Jour ' e 1-1 le 14° - 01 ,L. .1i ("' d Of )011- t - re it-ILY 0 11 ;`, L er 1 ) " . rll. I( • D e , [IX , . . ; . i nduidual, even th oug h they should be of opini o n tweets this country and Ireland, an d est a bli s h a Coosa that sucle punistimeet would be unjustly inflicted. ' gtitutional.conoection'between the Catholics of Ire- Threreotion went to attack his collat.& indireEtly, land and this country, instead of a connection with and I alh for a condeinnatiOn upon him, which,Under , any foreign powers. The laws of the country not • -such circumstances, mat be more painful than if the . admitting the laity of those to fill any office in the • ..moti e n had Been direCily brought against him. '1 a State whatever was the worst systein of policy ima ' shicision of the House on his case, he thought, was • ginable. England Might say to Ireland ". fellow ; oaing n ot only to the transaelion referred, to having y our own faah, we do not understand your ceeed, taken .place, but from its being their conviction, but there is retie thing which we both tinclerstandand that under all the circumstances, .no critninating feel the necessity ef, an eternal '; separation from 1 reselntion was deserved. The Noble Lord's wish to French politics." That England might justly re .. - expunge from the-J ourna l s the Resolutions of the qu i re Ireland, withourdegradation, t o concede,-o, House, because they contained no censure on him, ' Without that no Protestant Could be safe, and With was wishing them. to pass an indire& censure - on his it no Catholic could be dangerous. With.this pro : . concha - CI, which, ie such a case, was most unjust to p os itr on t h e C at h o li cs of Kildare agreed• ; they kne w the iedi v id u al . It h e were to be placed in such u . that domestic nomination would not go . to injure_ ... - new dioetion, bein g i n effect again pat o n hi s tr i a l, ' their religio n ;—..they had agreed t o admit that prin he ought to be allowed to give any explanation of his , cip 9 le in 179, an th wou • not. h. ared to . condue.t in his po wer , ava ili ng hi mse lf of suc h means : it if such effects d hadbeen ld elikely to ave resu g lt e from as might have grown out of the former discussion.: it. No religion could oblige a man to obey the ' The:Noble Lord professed to have no wish to make enemy of his country. He was for establishing the question personal': He could not thank him fbr a ,domestic nomination, as that would most ef his clemency, as he th oug h t t h e course taken most i, fectually tend to unite the empire, while a fo unjust towards him and towards the House. What- a reigo nomination must be an everlastig source of ever he. might haVe tell had th e d ec i s i on o f t h e i suspicion. That established, the right s of Protestants Rothe been against him before, he should think hint- ! may be safely communicated to Catholic. But Eng self pl ace d i n a more cruel situation now, if the tno- ... land had no ri g ht t o suc h a concession, while she de tion Were carried, as that circumstance would leave ' nied to them that liberty to which as subjects - they the world to impute to him anything the most cor- 1 were entitled. Give them their emancipation; and I rapt mind could imagine. If the decisions of -the i then you have e right to ex.peEt them to submit to douse were expunged now, it would be thought domestic nomination. Parliament had no right to that this conduct merited their censure before. This make partial laws or to frame' different codes for Was the view he took of the question, which, think- various parts of the community, or to make disabi t unjust, he felt it to be his duty humbly to submit lilies under circumstances connected v . vith religion, to the House. at the mariner in which a m a n wors hi ps h i s Maker - Lora FO LKSTONE contended, the motion of his does not materially affeet civil society. If a lawyer Noble Friend neither went directly or indirectly to were to plad on the ground of a - disqualifying oath I rnpeach the- condu& of the Noble Lord who had 1 e would be laughed at in Westminster Hati ; and Just sat down. In the coulee of the present Session if a Judge on such rounds were to instrua a Jory to 4 everal petitions had been rejected for certain cap- convict an accused iser, - on he would be punished. . . linos. ex'preasions .therein c onta i ne d . Hi s Noble - yet on-such evidence had a four t h p art of the corns I l riend had observed, that there -were expressions munity been excloded from the rights*of subjects Which were not talaen notice of by. Ministers, Mote of this realm. ' He then adverted to' the-question 13 frenaive than those to which they had object- lay the six Universities in 1791, which were these • ed.' To prevent their being again thrown out, be three.. " Has the Pope any temporal power in proposed to expunge Cent whicle gave rise to.them - England ?" " Has the Pope any deposing power?" troll] their Journals.. That was the object of his " Does the duarine of faiih extend to heretics ?" • 'notion, end n o t t o agitat d t h e quest i on again. How iTo these the _ mo s t sat i s f a a ory answers-.were given. 'the Noble Lord could think hi s N o bl e Friend defy- ! They denied that the Pope had any temporal power cient in clemency, he. was at a loss to conceive, as in Great Blitain; and - abjured his deposing power ' 4 point o f hi s s p eec h w as i n the nature-of an at-' i altogether'. Yet these question s h a d b een consi d ered tac o k. He approi,-ed of the motives by which• his as the test of the Catholic claims. s:bey were, f riend was actuated, and should give the motion his, nov.vithstandiug, charged wi t h an oat h that went to s upport. , • . .. • i transfer their ailegiaece to another, and to the dis t Mr. WARD strongly opposed the motion. It wag ; solution of civil society. - - Iti answer to the charges neither more nor less than trying his Noble Friend preferred against . them he would app ea l to t h e .' 3 l 3 posi.e (Lord Castlereagh) twic e u p on t h e same existing Government. Did they euppoSe the Ca eharge. At the time the case of the Noble Lord tholics were worse than idolaters ? The Cathulica Was discussed before, it should he remembered he it should be remembered were Christians, but they :Was one of his' Majesty's Ministers. He was then • seetned to think the followers of Cliiist. worse than a cquitted. WOuld it be well to give those out of . the followers of Maliornet. If illis were the case, 'doors an opportunity of saying the House of Com- they made a traffic of the attributes of omnipotence "eons would ponisli the same person for the same of- and made the uthasore of criminally the price of . lance, as bleb ; while he was one of his, Majes- redemptiOn Bola servitude. Where argil - talents were V's over ? ellioiitees, they had th o u g ht proper to pass advanced hewoOld,attenal to thetn ; b u t w h en mere , assertions were made against his co,untry lie would ° , . ‘ MT. O ft me :supported the m o ti on , conce i v i ng i t to disregard ahem. He w ou ld not b e li eve t h at It ish - a lauclabieeendcavour to do away the foulest blot man upon his oath who -- would so give evidence t hat ever stained the Heuse of Commons, and on against his countrymen; ' That which was charged the - grounds of its being quite distinct fron t the for : aaainst . Ireland cou ld r i ot .proceed from religion ; , 0 ra ter tnotione • ! they must therefOre look to physical or moral causes Lard A. I - Tamil...roar, in reply, dhiclaitned anyper- • for the depravity complained of. It could not pro , scrtar aaj ac k on the Noble Lord who , A, as the subjeet - .oeed from physical causes ; God might puniih, but of the former discussion. He Wished to support the . he could not corrupt. fie did not go to the door of ' d ignity' of the House, and the -Noble; Lord had not , the Protestant and stop .short of that of the Cetho- Pointed out anY otheranet hod by- width his purpose :, lie. He did not poison' the Catholic side of the 1 4= °Uld so effectually be a nswere d. H e h ad not . : river, and bless that on whi c h th e P rotestant res i ded, u rnught forward .the motion from a wish to flatter It must then proceed froth moral causes—from the the feelings of a faction and gain popularity. If he '. -laws of the English Government. It could not pro s ucceeded in g e tti ng t he resolutions expunged from ceed frorn the - air of Irela n d, i t cou ld , not ar i se from t he. Journals, he should think he had gained . a very the soil, stior could it emanate from the Virgin Mary, the point toward s re - es tablishing that Hous e i n f rom t h e E ucharists, or from the Councils of Trent. !he esteem-of the, Public. Iflie failed- in the present ' The charge ought not to be made against the Ca . lusten.le, he should not yet despair of seeing the day tholica, but against England. The case stood thus, Zhen -those r eso l ut i ons w hi ch res p eated the . Noble f Engl an d had been 'n possession of .Ireland f o r a pe iellOrd, as well as the resolution concerning the Chan- riod of 500 years, and the result was the matchless or of th e E ac h eq U er, would be expunged trome depravity, of the pe o pl e . Th e c h ara dt er given of their Mtnue s. He would detain the: House ao fon- ,' the Irish. had no truth in it. The vices that deform ger, but-b -lure he resumed his seat, he again de- ,ed it a ' sprung- so l e ly f rom oppression. He knew of d ared that he had no intention of trying the Noble • nothing that ought to withhold -from Ireland a full " 3 / 4 °41 twice for the same 'offence, nor did he see that ` participation in the privileges of Englishmen. ' The Ills motio n , tied such an effeti, I fundamental la ws o f 'h e country - did not forbid it,• Mr. WARD and Lord cesTeetteeou•explained, • I or-if they did, why were they hot told so before the The question . was then put, and the Motion nega- Union, and now having taken their own Parliament ti l l ed without a division. - • away, say " you are atxciuded from ours by the CATIIOLIC CLAIMS. . 1 - , fundamental laws of the country." He deified that .. . : any of those illustrious iustruiucnts otliberty, which Mte GRATTAN 'moved diet the Petition which he . . be Presented front the Catholics of Ireland shOuld it was impossible to mention but with reverence and was gratitude, ddrls:tl the granting of such immunities to e Put on the Journals as read. The petition • accordingly entered. He considered the aulije& lie - Ireland. From the construction -put upon them, it should, howes er , a pp ear, t h at they said not only W as about briugine before the Horse a's .one of vital" ttrareortance to' the best i n t eres t s of the country; as : that no Catholic-shill be King, but that no C at h o li c ~e nd ing to the enfranchisement of - a-consid era bl e ,shall be n free su bj e ct. Th at on which such pp -I'l ot our own countrymen. If he should live to press i on. was f ounded, was in every instance lawless• e,,3- their petition acceded to, .he should consider This interpietation of ihe laws COMIllitS that violence sur e „.1, , - against the. Catholics which it professed to guard te oao a tierunwe man, as two immense advan- . ageinst. It confirmed their allegiance, and took ges would thence be derived to . the commuoity.— away their birth-tigia. Would it be said that. it .vas e '''' . e should have the happinesi of witnessring the rigist to ad 'Wes towards the Catholics ? Was. it 4niricipati6a of our Catholic brethren in - .lreland, : htl ea ci rt t s h , e right to tender the disqualifying oath'? - Parliament consolidatiott of toe,British Empire in their did not make men, nor their privileges neither; but lie should ground his arguments on two 1/°i nts - s first, oe the exclusion 'of foreign influence in men made Parliaments. l'he disqualifying oath arose from the madtteSs of the Moment; it was no 111 e notnioation of Rish B:shops ; and secOndly, on , ~',',.e extension of British pritileges to 'lrish 'sub eels. ' part of theelSw of the land. With resped to the thekluwever Gentlemen iniefit ditYer on We subject of : Coromition 'oath, it did c but pledge the Sovereign to maintaiu the Proteatant religieri as it is established , veto, all, lie thought must -agi:e in the prO- 1 , ! li ety ot inakirg some saii,faeiory - carat%% enient by lois. Theinterpretarion put on it was, that bet tering; the condition oPthe Catholic must necessarily 7 11 1). ties great Catholic 13 , cly. For his u wn. part, he ci "as of great tics veto might be granted without' injure or endanger the Protestant religion. This in 41"ge: of its producing any undue or sitriater in- terpretation he objected' to, as it-supposed the la-as „ u nce to their prejudice. The first Mae‘istrate to be irreVocable, and Penalties eternal. It was the ,o .2(rh t .. duty of the Chief Magistrate to guard the freedom of K . , to have a check on the Pope, and that the his people ;' but taking his coronation oath, if to te. . , . 1 g . was best Judge of the tenure - by which the al- . sa ,' 6 'inke of his subjeas should be held;, bin to this were as it had been interpreted, he called God to e : Present -he thought the Catholic body would not. witness an unwarrahtablp , obligation. The penal ‘t i rt , e, Pertaining the noinidation of a foreign power, laws' were enacted some of them' in the reign of -. 1.1 tit,; Ring had . not a veto would oe . madness.-- King William; others in that of Queen Ann. The s e , d id not say it would be so - if the Pope tacre in laws could be altered, but it should seem their se , ld situatiou, as being in that case but a spirt- verity could not be mitigated. Here were two oaths ewe ita_ . tttim sl o agis yate, he could be supposed to have no broeght a to bear' on toe interests of the Catholics, the one arising out of the madness of the 'moment, et , i n j.. l nor Jurisdiction, and conseqeently no serious the other SO iliterpre!ed , as to forbid a relaxation of s t i r ' ceeld thence be expected to wise to Ibis . undue, severity. •It was said the Catholics did not r , e , ; , bu t when the Pope . bee tme a Frenchman, hi. , -trier a Preochman beebme '.•• !lope; to admit of want enetecipation, that they were too poor and too ' nr:lniwitioo was nut to . 1 , 1 . . • 1 ignornit to make use of it. Was he to understand be t i teen( o, as the rus set-tee _:. France to lest would thus e,,.;.v bed the' i'a le 2 a}' in - •1 : by that that the severity of the laws had destroyed 1 the in ora t c education of the people ? " Are our • 1., , ,, 411,1 . I It± wished to - re ‘t , 1....! ibt.• ilOiti:i2 linit6^ V .'" i ' ,\‘‘ N4ll ca lia&citySed stscit .o:1 - a, -- I.liffe:e Cis be; i i. 'rune-')" said We Hon. Gentleinao, "_to be our i J ' in that deteshble rant of I...inatirrf, and to forget, that all (his inf:ened in a tli• ligious as thlle-obtviun is p in, and ciancord is.salvation. riellona had now slin! h."?' d'a'ps, BiA -gotry had now spent her .fury. (Inefl , id re.- sented a .Petition against the Rofnan Cat:tolics the City of Lou.on had not ;•sot;eral e:n.i . ;iies had come forward in their ta ,, lnr; the Uriti rsity of Oxford did nGt oppose them ; and. the Pulpit ae.• knowledged their ciaims. He begged the ilouse to recollect that in -179,2 it had established' Popery North America ; that it hay; but latelrseut out an artny to maintln' a co entry in all the right.: ztf thd Roman Church: that there tv.as nut , a countiy whicb it bac!• not embraced, bUtsone. •He moved, that a Comm.ttee shoulcl.be appointed 'to eon4idet the Catholic Pent:lola:. argarrn'ents. Are we to say, We havo.broken your hearts,--;;xe. have broken .y our fortunes, and now all we ask of you is to lay down your lives in our - service ?" The Catholics, he contended, ~were competent to discharge the funaioos of, manyoffices in. the States They were increesings iu respeala ,bility. Since the year 1788, they had purchased great quantities of land: They Werenot so ignorant as to,be tine evils under which they were doomed to groan: It they ink a poor ignorant Catholic if he wants emancipation, he. will reply, " lie don't know Letin." But, if he were asked this plain questioe, " Do you know the diffe'rence between .the situation o a Catholic and -that of a Protestant he 'Would immediately . answer ct•he did," and bring forward his catalogue of sorrows, - of insults; and of mortificatiens, arising from a cruel partiality alike aid unjust. Would they reclaim those they stigmatiaesl, let them re peal those laws which pressed heavy on the tholice and restore to him that protection which as a man he is entitled to, which as a subject should be afforded to him. When such invidious 'distindions were done away, the population would gain' an eles vation of mind, the State an addition of ktrength. It did not become us to -say we have elevated minds, and liberty is necessary to us; put you nate pour ignorant fellows, and have no ,use for . it. When the mind of the Catholic was lowered and debased by oppression, they j:repared him towelcoMe a foreign invader. Who would with the greatest energy resist Bonaparte ?—a Freeman. .He conjured them not to say • that the Catholics desired civil ad vantages to use them aiiiost the Protestants. The legislature that withheni civil l'herty on account of imaginary danger was guilty of oppression. In tak ing the Catholic's rightful frarichiSe from him, we endangered 'our own civil liters ies, in' subjecting a felion.v subject to oppression. Our condo& was pre posterous in detaching so large a portion of fellow subjects rrom our cause. It was like passing an ant, with a clauie enaeting, Anat. as we are engaged in a most .sanguinary cennia, and it is peculiarly desir able,that weashould be aided by the whole of our population, a fourth pistol them are hereby disOua e , lified from sera ing their country. Suppose a man of war with., its enemy in sight, and a learned man was to say to the Captain stich things occurred cen tunics ago, and such .canons were passed in the La- . - • teran Council;, suppose his vessel to be partly wan- The Select Committee, appointed to consider of the Proceed tied with Papists, would he throw these seamen ings rind', and to be had, with reference to the several Fa overbuard ? Th e EMpire is this Vessel, the ark i n pers. s - gned '6 FRANCIS BURDETT," tree CWIU e OD S 01 which •- related to. his being apprehended and comMitted to the the French deluge, in it is assembled a people, one- . rower of•London,_. and which Paper s were communicated fourth of whom you would drown. He next came to the House by Mr. SPEA KER, upon .the 13th and 17th the Ch days of April l ast; an d to report such facts as they may to consider erch'itself n the state of theitish think necessary, together with their opiniou therenpoa v Church -is Protestant ; the people are Catholics, vet - front time to time, to the House; and to whom the.inat ters stated by the S er j eant et AXrnt? att en di g rite i lou se , pay for the M a i ntenance o f i t, and y ou take away . -aai the Frocess served upon him man Action at L aw . by their privilege s f or eupporting ;to sacrifice to an l Sir . 1 ..R A N S R okr T ; and also the SUIIIIIIODS SCrV,:d on image dangerous to the people.and injurious to God, Mr., Sr EA K ER, and Cie Notice of Dec:Lira/i o n delivered to you shoulder G o d f ro ' n ' be etles, and the people front the Serjeairt at Arms, attire suit of the said Sir FRA N C IS Bult DET r, I , vere. reterred ; have, pursuant to-the Orders of the , Constitution. S u p po se t h e L or d s Keamare and the lloase, with all dispatch, considered considered the matters re- Fingal tied seats in Parliament, perhap's they would i eerie to them, and have agreed to the following Report : 'form a conspiracy and tor what ?—to give a Fierich It appears to your Committee, after referrin 8.5:4013 7001. esyears*. Stippo-e a Preacher, reciting %he Ordet a the House of the tit day o: April r33', ill his pulpit, should say, " LOVe your eneptiies- 7 Do • for the coimnitment of Sir Franci s B ur d ett to t aa,you avaell be don e b y , so may G o d tuclibe Tower ; the-Warrams of the-Speaker for that per your hearts to injure one-fourth of your fel-- pose ; the Letter of Sir Francis Burdett to the' lows,". He was nut astonished at the sage who said Speak al er, d ,ted the 7th d of r le e e globe was stieperted by an elepha n t ; this might port and examination of ay Ap the Ser il jeant ast g at the ms,. be laughed at, b at co n ce i ve the crutching of the • touching hi s p rocee di ngs i n the execution of such Omnipotent with a pcinl Code; take away - the,)a±hs, warrants ; the notices of the Speaker referred to the elephant which supports this *Pahl lc; and • the your Committee; the dennand made upon the Ser whole tales into rum .; such is the united system of jeaut at Anus of e copy of the warrant-under Which modern casuistry. The Ttienext, argument against the he 'arrested Sir Fisnicis Burdeti ; - the Writ s rved. . Catholics Might be reduced to six criminal propo-* upon the Serjeant, eud the summons served upon sitionse Feist, that the ma jo r i ty o f t h e Christians the Speaker, and. the notice-of declaration tiled are the worst ; 2d, That a great part of Great Bri- , against the Serjeent ; which said notices, deemed, taro must be in a state of abject, depravity ; 3 d , writ, and sumnions, are all at the suit- or on behalf That it 'is incompatible with the fundamental Laws• of the said Sir Francis Burdett, and all bear the of the CoirStitution to enfranchise the people of name of the same Seliciter, 'John Ellis :—That the Ireland; 4th, That the country Which serves. his said proceedings have been brought against the Majesty against their inte r e sts s h ou ld . not be Speaker and the S e rj eant , on accoupt ot what was free. The two last he referred to the disqualifica- ' done by them respectively in obedience to the Ord. r tion for every : right attending those who contris of tine House ; .and for the purpse of bringing into buted to the supp or t of the- Protestant Church, all question, before a Court of Law, o the leg-ality of the which propositions were monstrous. From these proceedings of the House in ordering the, must result the ruin of the Empire, which is but to merit of Sir Francis Burdett, and of, the conduct of divide the people in the - face of -the, enemy. In the Speaker and the 13erjeant, in Obc'dletlCC to that Ireland two distinct penal laws were made, one Order. swept .away the Trade, the other the Constitution ;' I.—your Committee, not in consequenee of any of the Country, and the judicature of the Peers. doubt open tine qeestioa so intended tip be raison, Having thus disposed of the liberties of Ireland, let but for the purpose of 'collecting into one such pre- !us see what became of its fortune : so years after cedents of the proceedings of tire House, upon the people and the Government were rui n ed, Go - cases O f B reach of Privi l ege, ' as might- afford light veramenncould notsupport the people, it could not upon this important subject, have in the first place even pay its reduced - esiablishinc i p ;it was obliged examined the Journals, with relation to the praJice to borrow 50,0901. from England, and. 20,0001, of the House in, commitment of persoes,.w healer from an individual ; it was obliged to beg at the Members or- others, for breach es .o f pr i v il ege, by , doer of a private Ge n tl eman to get bread for its offensive words or writings derogatory tethe honour :army. It was said that one cause of this calamity and character of the House, or of atiy -of its Mem was that the people of Ireland staid at home ; they bens ; and they have found. numerutis -instances, in did not go to .America ; they were obliged, hoW- the history of Parliament, so far as the JoUrnals ex ' ever, to get relict in the exportation of one another; tend, of She freqeent, uniform, and /uninterrupted without a free Trade they sunk into ruin. Cousidee prantice of the House of • Com Mons, to commit to - so nanny millions of people, in a country blesst d different custodies, persons whom' they have ad with-fertility 'of soil, with temperature of eliinine, judged-gunty of a breach of their privileges by so without any plague, and 'having nes enemy but its offstld , pg. , s own laws, sinking into ruin from the Penal Code ;- ' The :statemene of these precedents, 'Which esta-; a judgment of God on the people for receivin g i t , blish the Law of Parliament Upon' this point by He now came,so eornider the repeal in 1788 ; most the usage ot Parliainetit ; the utility of such a law ; of the laws which restrained the religion of the and the necessity which exists for its cantinuanye, Catholics were then trinnlled, and p ersona l f ree d om in order' 10-tualti rain the digeity and indeP.Th!ence was secured by the Habeas corpus Ant, the revenue of the House of Commons ; its analogy was made anooai, and the trade tree ; the plaet 1- acknowledged powers ot- 'Courts of Jus,ice, au 1 tion trade was opened—the legislative pee er of the . the recogiticion of :Lich fight in various iost seense Privy Conned, was'establnhed, .and • ,tlie Irish Par- by legal. authorities, by judicial . de'cisions, andeby liament, whose privilege before only 'lay rest iv- the other blanch of the Legislature; as well ail did hag petitions, was contirined in its furl Honours: invariable assertion and maintenance of it by the what -was the consequence-? the exports soon in- House of Commons are, topics which may be re. - creased one-half, the populatitin one-third, and the served fora further Report. And, although there are' • cultivation of the country was enabled to feed on:an sortie instances in. Which the House has thought fit to increase of a' million, and send a redundancy to direct prosecutions for such offences, yet the Com- Great Brirdn : young Leland burst forth like the mitres:confidently state, that the more trequent prac morning, amid came again to she world as a young flee of the House, an all time, has been to vindicate giant rejoicing in his strength. In 1795, 45 millions its (Ain privileges by its own authority. Lit yardS of linen had been eeported, and so quickly' .2. The suojeet which appears to your Commit did prosperity tread on the heals of the statute, that tee to press must urgently tor an immediate. report, national power seemed to stand on the right hand is, the state of the law and the practice of tie House of Parliament. Religion then opened the gates of in cases either of criminal prosecution or civil action' d scord, and Providence scourged the country so ra- against any of its Members, for any thing spoken or pidly with events, that all seemed a continued dune in the House of Commons; or fur any pro- series of causes and etieds. , The same principle seeding against any of its officers, or any other per- - • .as then should now unite the whole, and you s m acting under.its authority. should consider (said •Mr. Grattan) that our fiber- - The principal instances to be found under this. ties and your empire are the same. He, now came head arose out o f those proceedings which, in tho to his conclusio n ; he.wished, to avoid the dungeon time of Charles the First, Charles the Second, and ot_ bigotry, and the mad-house of prejudice ?—to James the Second, were instituted by the of c e:su e forget those wl o went 'so lar as ro forget their God, 'the Crown, in dtrogation of the rights and pi ivi , • 's Sir J. C. HIPPI3mLY seconded .the , mbtion, and made observations of a considerable length, which, from the low tone of the Honourable Baronet's voice, were totally inaudible intfavery part of the gallery. He read several authorities and extracts, and expressed his resolution of maintaining the Ca-a tholic right. Alr:-O‘l.lAaA urged the necessity of . Members having time duly Jo consider the subje4, and tQ peruse such documents as were necessary to enabfq• them to give a fair vote. .For thi s pttrpose he sloutti move, that the further debate ')c abiourncd io TtiurS day next. "rite question upon this motion was then pur i y Vie Speaker and carried. Mr. FOSTER brought in the Irish Strong Beer Retail. Allowance bill ; was re a first time, and ordered to be read a second ,ti.t.e on Monday. The other Orders of the Day were dispoqei of, and at 1 - 131 f-past 0.. e o'clock the H.)use adjourned till Monday. SIR FRiINCIS BUIWETT. PIRST REPORT FROM THE SELECT PROCEEDINGS RELATIVE TO SIR ERA S:CIS pE [Orde:ed, by tife House of Commons, to be printed, r ith May, a to.] If the : , 6ti,11, G rat - )n crest s ~vhicj2 Le dis- mious ussed. near y: Ty :n the ;lit to Voblil er to oa . ch- W 3i; NV a Ia lure iouse )g ou ly to Oa stated (rota g in dero- louse. erk to tions, Lord hip iIl 177 g, guaid ion of latiou o use ipt of effea sistent been h e va late- which orig' flouse o ira" - t e r for 5. :31Clea . prac - . in th e ' C pur been o f I ,l ' °. od th e E° sov