The Sun. — London, England, 1809-12-07 00:00:00

LdlV 1001iT. COURT OF KING'S BENCH. DECEMBER 1. EETTISON 11. SILL H. BROMLEY, BART. This wai an is s ue 'out of Chancery, and :he Prin cipal purport of its being sent to this' Court - tor the decision of a Jury,• was ,to :,scertain . the validity of the kilt of the late Sir H. Bromley PounCelert, Bart. deceased. After Mr. PARKS had stated the case on behalf of the pt:lintitf, arid the will was - Put in and read, a Mr. Smith was called to Prove the testator's hand-writ ing,, and the hond-Writing of-himself and the other twoattesting witnesses, which he did. The A'rtoaNEY-GENERAL interrogated. Mi. Smith .on behalf of the defendant, and if appeared that one Othe .at testing. witnesses was. a Lady of the name of S,4iiith, whose husband was appointed by the Very same will to be one of 'the executors therein named to the testator's estate and etreels ; upon which lie toqls: an objeaibn to - the validity of the will,' inas, Enoch, as the law requiring that a will should be at=- tested-only by persons who were credible and com petent- witnesses that an interested person- could _riot be a -.credible yitness ; that Mrs. Smith being the wife of the executor, Mr.. Smith, and he baying SaA interest tinder the very will which she attested, could , not thcretore --be a competent witness, and, consequently that faEt affected the validity of this will,. and it could nut be received in evidence to dis, pose of the real estate. Lord ELLENICOUGH desired that Mr. Smith might be examined as to whetb , m - he derived, by bequest or otherwise, any interest or benefit by the will its question; and it appearing that he was merely named as an.execotor, ‘vitbolit any benefit, profit, or legacy whatsoever, his Lordship ruled - that he having no interest dire6tly by virtue of the will, e fortiori,. his wife could have no interest under it, and consequently she! was both,a-competentand a credible witness, and as such could fairly and legally attest. the samer. But as it was a new. case ; and of sorne.magnitude in - future discussions of Such sub he thought :it most advisable, therefore, that, the July 1 1“. , uld,,find for the' plaintiffs,. and, the point beoreserved- tor more sqlettin aditiOicattou, in the shapeof a special case. LINLEY V. COCKER, GENT. • This was an action brought :by Mrs. Lin ,wi . claw 'of the late Mr. Linl4,, one of ih'e Patentees of Drury-lane Thyre, ag.inst the defendant and his brother, who are attornies i 'and hiive been in .0:-. -partnei Alp togetbei,forceitain monies came - their band; belonging to Mrs. Lailey, Subsequeat to 'the death of: het huibind. It appeareditiat Mr."Linley, by his will, 'hatl,ap pointed Mr. Sheridan and Mrs. Linley to be axe .cutors of the same ; that Mrs. Linley only under took the . cxecuton-hip i , Mr. Sheridan•in o way:in terfering ; that some profess'innal business had, been done by the. Gentlemen (who are the defendants), for Mr. Linley in amount, time, the aount, of whiCh when they were called upon to account with Mrs. Linley for the monies by them received, they con , sidered thernselves entitled 'to stop. This,, however, Mrs. Linley would not consent to ; and therefore she brought • this aaion. • The witnesses who were proved those faets, and,a verdi,3 was given for the plaintiff—Damages, 3001. • Mr. Sheridan, who had been called upon by sub pcena as a wimess, was in Court the whole time, end tooked extremely well. He had a short con-, versation with the Attorney-General when the cause was finished. • It appeared tttat the whole principle he rested tenon the • the circumstance, whether . the Messrs. Cockers, (who certainly 'are very honourable and respectable liraititioners) should or should not claim, by way of set off, such dedu&icips. The COurt icas of opinion that in tri6i lair they could not. DECEMBER 2. THE KING. V. GRIFFITH. This was an indiiment charging the defendant, an Attorney of Cow, residing in Somersetshire, with sending a letter conceived in highly offensive and unbecoming 'terms to Mr. M.essiter, also - an Attorney. of Court, residing at the. same place, with intent to cause a breach of the peace. Lord ELLENBOROUGHIased if the defendant could tot still put himself right by making such an apology as would ptovesatistattory to Mr. Messiter. If the case shoved be made out, and the defendant be call ed up for judgment, the Court could not allow any thing of the kind to pass lightly by. Mr. GARROW said his client had 'felt the impro ptiety of his conduet from ,the first moment after he had sent the. !Apr in question. He. was now in , struded put''ici, - , to express the defendant's sorrow for having written the letter, a sorrow which his- client would himself. have expressed in writing, were he nor - at this :moment - !actable to use his a . tn, which was hung.in siing, in. consequence of an accident. _ The ATTORNEY-GENERAL- was inclined to take the apology, but Mr. .Messiter insisted on having a verdict, leaving it to the defendant, by the.- line of prt,ceeding .he might adept between ,this and the first day of next term to _satisfy Mr. 14Ie,siter that' it was unnecessary to call for the judgment of the Court. . The case Was then provd, when ix appeared that Mr. Messiter baying obtained lt dgment. f0r.1261: costs, against a gentk man of tilt name - of Jeregniah, Donoi'an, had on the following day pnt in a writ of. into Mr. Dunovah's house ; at ..which the defendant, who was the friend of Donovan, and also his partner in a banking coocerp, in. Somerset shire, which they carried on at Wi:icanton, in So tnersetshire, and suspealing that Mr. Messitcr, who also carried on' the business of a banker in, the same place, rnight have bzeu actuated by a desire to in iere the credit of Donovan, did, on the impulse of the moment, and while in a state of irritation, write the libel in question. The Jury, without hesitation, found ,the defen dant guilty. , WEDNESDAY, DEC. G. Two or three causes stood over, one on accovnt th'e absence of the Attorney-General, who was too unwell to - attend: Mr. GAIMOW iaid he WaVil hopes his Learned Friend, would be able ►o cone down <to 7 cnoi row, • his illness being, -1.4. tempOrary. WATSON' V. PEARS. This- was an action tor initinging • the patelt of the .Plaintiff., The cause was _opened- by Ur; SELWIN. , Mr. GARROW opened the case, which he said Was not a frivolous one, although 4,6 - light be so treated. It was an action foe infringing the Plaintiff's patent,' granted him as the inventor. of the transparent ;code. In ancient days thiegs of thiskind were disregatd ede but in the,. poesent state of polished- society they, !became itivortant.This,was a • valuable discovery to those who were fond of the conveniencies of easy and elegant . ablution. Of soaps, he, knew nothing -further than . washing , face and shaving _himself, which he had done with his, client's soap, to his de light ; it resembled, in utility, the famous - razors of Mr. Pa'ckwood',. who had - advertised that a man • might shave himself with perfect safety, while he followed the chace in full gall-up.; and the opera= tion of washing with the transparent soap was so pleasant, that. one might' get , out of bed .three or tour times a night to perfoi in that operation with it. - The Defendant, envious of . the reputation of this seap,, had imitate; it; and was able to undersell . the inventor, because he produced an article, of coarser materials ; which he called Peers's ,Transpa rent Soap, - an injury, which me be was now called upon to _repair in damages to the Plaintiff. Ife , under- • stood that some atterppt ew as to be made,tO prove that- the Plaintifr.s' e invention was not new. That a Doctor Letton claimed die Merit of the inven lion 'of - Abe Transparent -Soap; bet that would. not do, be was not - so as well 'might it he iiirlintajned that he had extracted sun-beams, out of 'cucumbers.— There was no doubt that the, Plaintiff was the in ventor Of this elegant soap, and,inore, that the would•pioteet him in the enjoyment of, its-profits. The patent. being proved, it was dated the 10th of May, 1808, and - granted to- the Plaintiff: for 14 years; inrolled within a, month. Mr. Nicholson gave a scientific aescription of the composition of thiS soap, and said he believed it to be the ale,olute nivention , of the Plaintiff, as did also Mr. Fred. Accum, :Soho, Professor of Chemistry at the Royal Institution. -• Mr.- Davidson; the Perfumer, of Fleet-street, Mr. Rigg, Mr. Blevii, MreStats, and. Mr. Cryer, . emi nent in the erade of. perfumery, said, they 'had: sold .this article' for the Plaintiff, - - who was patentee '! of, it. They never heard- of any such thing as the ! Persian wash-ball or the Philipine wash-cake, or any other transparent soap before-that of the Plaintif f 's traesparent soap. • , Mr. PARK,' tOr •the Defendant, allowed the two Chemists -who had been examined to be men of 'science ;-they bad not heard of theicakeor wash-ball which had been mentioned, and they might, reason ing Scientifically., conclude there could be no - such thing unless compounded of the materials whiCh con ,.stituted the mass of the Plaintiffs transpaient soap. Bet One faa . Was worth ten, thousand philosophical refleEtions, or want of knowledge ; and • that fael., he should prove,' notwithstanding the wit of his Learn ed,Friend, "who.had contrived to eraise a prejudice against the witness.- , Lie' should r call a person to L prove , the faet, and, that :was ::Dolor Lettone And here he could not , help .obser6ng, that he .had the advantage of his Learned Friend in. the use of soap. Mr. Garrow says,' observed Mr. Park, that he knows no more of soap than the use h 4 makes of it in washing his face.". Now, I have read in old books of our profession, that a man innst„eorne i n t o A Court of Justice with clean hands, and therefore I always wash my hands before I come into Cciait, because I like to conform to the_ancient custorn of coming into a Court of Justice with. clean hands; but Mr. Ga:rciw cares\ not about .his hands, so his face be clean. He then said he should prove that the plaintiffs was not a new invention, but had been borrowed/ by the Plaiptiff of Dr. .Letton, 'and and then obtained a patent for it. It then appeared in evidence, that Doelor Letton had invented a composition,. called The Persian Wash, or Philipine Wash Cake, Which' was, in fad, a. transparent soap; and had transferred it to' a Mr. Cockel, who transferred it to Shaw and Ed.; wards, Perfumers. After various intermediate proofs'', to this effect. • . , Doctor Letton himself proved the fast, that he had invented a perfectly traniparent soap, the tomt dation of which ,-was .Doctor Steere's Opodeldoc, which was a solution of soap with spirits of wine; that he had imparted the secret to a young man, in the • service of Ching and Butler, and then he thought the recipe of no further value, and so com municated it to several others, • amongst whom was Mr. Ball, of Dublin, for which be was pre sented with 501. long before .the Plaintiff obtained this Patent, Lord ELLENBOROIiGii.--" * The witness consider ea,the secret as'fiett, and then he communicated it to several and therefore, Mr. Darrow, your client is elearly .no inventor ; he appears to be the imitator, and not the inventor." Mr. GARROW.—" Does your Lordship consider this as a clear case ?" Mr. PARK..—" A transparent one, that your client must be nonsuited." Lord ELLENBOROUGIT..--" There really is no thing in the secret. of this process; .it seems to me no yore difficult than the making of a jelly—the Plaintiff must be nonsuited." Mr. PARK.-" No, my Lord; a nonsuit will convey no intelligence to the Lord Chancellor, by whom this issue is sent here to be tried, and there fore, a verdiet for the Defendant if your Lordship and-the Jury please." , The Jury, after a. few _Words of .his Lordship, fou4d a verdict for the Defendant. .• day. She claimed . ber - trunk cortaining sctrie:of her acrd `pawn-brokers' tickets of many more of them, bui refused ee cieliver them ..00. was proved by one of 'th'e untertunate.girls in :the house. . , Lord ELCENBOROUGH asked, whether theDefen dant-ciaied a lien upbn these gocds on account of a'debe whiyh she had incurred in the course of fo stitution, for that could not be endured in a Court of Justice. Mr. PARK Said, No, that *mild certainly:::not do. .Bu on account of money Which the Defen dant had attu2lly advanced to _redeem these-goods out of pledge. He called a witness,- one Solomon Jacobs ; who swore that he called on the. Plaintiff ftoni (te D.- - fendant, and told herthat be had a demandon. her of tWo . suins of money of 31. Cos. and 31. ss. making Gl; 15S. - She did-not deny the debts, but said that she would give hii - n her7goods in pledge,and then tell a sailor, who she expected soon to arrivep.that she had - pledged the goods, and so get the money of him tPpay this. debt. • Lord ELLENBOROUGii..---" This is pledging goods on an undertaking to redeem' them by the wages of prostitution. That will not do in - a Court. of Law." . Mr. PARK.—“'No, my Lord; certainly nOt."— Verdi& for the Plaintiff. Damages referred to an arbitrator. • .• BAKER V. HAWSER. Mr. Gnnnow said this was a .q - ui tuna action to re cover penalties under . 'a 'stat'ute, on account: otl the Defendant having acted-as. the agent of, a iVlerchaut —he being a Cierk in the Customs of the- port of Liverpool. He could not try the cause without the evidence'ofJohn'rithothy Swainsori, and he did not attend, but he would have the Jury sworn for:the purpose of calling that gentleman on his itibp4enct; in order to ground a motion against him for at tachment for 'disobedience to- the process of the Court. Mr. TOPPING produced a certificate on behalf of Mr. Swainsonand said he was a perfectly-respect able merchant at Liverpool. Mr. GARROW.said he kneW nothing of Mr. Swain= son;except that it was his duty to attend the Court, in obedience to Its proCess, and that be did not do so, but had sent a paper Which could not be read in evidence. Lord ELLENEOROVGH said, that he - could not re ceive any written paper in evidence as an excuse for the non-attendance of a witness Who was bound to attend. Mr, TOPPING observed, that this action was brought upon .a statute passed about three centuries anct an half ago. _ Lord ELLE - NBOROUGPI said it was certainly a very old, but it was. nevertheless a very whole.some stao lute; to prevent CuStom-house Clerks being' agents to .Merchants the principle of which had been acted upon in many modern ibstanco, such as prohibiting Clerks of the Bank being Stock-Bro kers, &c. . _ Mr SWainson was then _called on his subpona, and - the Plaintiff nonsnited. OWEN „N. THOMAS JOIN JaNEs,, AND ,ANOTHER. Mr: PARK stated, thatJll4 . was a hard case upon the Plaintiff if he. could not recover in this .cause•: he was an AuCtioneer in AnWesea, and Mere an estatebelonging to M9ssrst.•Parry and Gwillirn Lloyd Wardle, ksq, in virtue:Of his mart - rage, which estate was dire&ed, by will, to .be sold,• sander sealed di realm, and it the sale did not come up to such di re lions, then._ the sale was void. The, f ) laintiff would not incur the risk of selling the eitate,'whh 7 out indemnity against the duty, which .he should have to pay the Excise ,in case the sale should be void. Mr. Ellis, Agent for the Defendant, undertook to indemnity the Auctiomer. The estate was sold, it did.not amount to 'the. sum Mated in'the sealed 'di rettions,•and the sale 'was void. Proceedings were afterwards had in the Exchequer against the Aue tioueer, and he was compelled to pay the duty out of his own pocket. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL 'GM Counsel for Col. _Wardle could not-attend to-clay, but instructed Mr. Garrow to contend on behall" of Colonel Wardle, that Ellis exceeded his -authority in entering into that indemnity for him.—Ellis is dead,• there can be no proof on this subjeP, and Lord ELLENBOROUPIi held, that a general authority as agent, would not do in this case, it must her specific.—Plaintiff non .suited. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DEc. 6. SOLODION V,' BEWICY. This was an anion to recover 4991.• from the Sun Fire~Office, on a policy of insurance, for certain goods, the,property of the Plaintiff; which were lost or stolen during the conflagration of Drury-Lane Theatre, in the month of February last. It appears from the testimony of several witnesses, on the part. of the Plaintiff, who resides in Vinegar yard, that previous to. ..the fire he had a stock of clothes, cloth, stockings, and various articles of wearing apparel, of 17001. value; but that on the morning after the fire, .in consequence of his being obliged, by the assistance of his neighnours, to re move the greatest part of his property into the act-, joining houses, and even to deposit some of them in the open court;, on taking stock he found a defi ciency of 4991. the loss of which lie could only ac count for,. by supposing they had been stolen or lost during the prevailing confusion, , For remuneration for this loss he applied to the Sun Fire-Office,' but they refused to re-imburse him. He therefore ' brought his action, on the groUnd of the Office being bound, by their policy of insurance, to secure to the insurer all losses of every. description that might be sustained' by fire, whether by 'adual conflagration, losses by removal, or otherwise. - On the part. of . the Fire-Office, it was proved, that 1601. had.been tendered to the Plaintiff, which he refused: And as the. Plaintiff did not satisfa&prily prove to the Court the amount of his adual losses, ths.TOry . Akturned a verdid for the Defendant. • WESTMINSTER ABBEY.—The exterior of this magnificent pile is now undergoing a thorough re pair, without any alteration being intended to be T • ; trade in the formof the ancient .arehiteaUre. Oa tho shpt where the budding stands, it being a small island, there. was, in the time of the • Romans, 3 heathen temple, dedicated to Apl/110. thathii, of this temple, Sebert, King of the East Saxons, la the y•earfi to, built the abbey, which was dedicated to St.Pvter, who; the legend says, consecrated it hirnielf,: the night before that ceremony was to be pettortne - d. — This church being destroyed in nisla tvars, was restored iti:9sB; by King . Edgar.-- In - 104g, it was rebtiilt biEdWard the Confessor, by wbotti it - was-amply endoWed; and it cdritinued 14. hands Of ;the Monks of St. Benedid tilt the general-dissolution oftnonasteries. Kino - Henry Ili ; in 1220, - finding,4lie walls and steeple of the old. structure . mtich'cieca'yed, Pulled them dbl . /tin, with 3 &Sign to enlarge and rebuild thcni in a•rnore' ,regu lar•manner ; but he did not live to accoMplish design, which. was ,not carried into effect fill 1285, about fourteen years.atter, his death, and this is th 6 date of the oldest part of the building now . gtririding (fhe satne_being 5'24 years Qld): - About the. year 1502, King Henry VII: began to build that chapel which is called- by his name, for a burial-place for himself and posterity. • SHIP NEWS. GRAVESEND - , DICEMBER S. Arrived—the Hamby, Watson, frog) •Flushing ;, Peprlf FOrster, front ()polio; and'the Pacific, Wardior, trorn QIN" bec. Sailed-- . the' Aurora, Glover, for,Africa ; Albion, Butler, for lawaica; Alexander, Turnbull, kir "fotiago ; lirattia/ Walker, tor Hayti; and the Aurora, Ekelund, lot Gotti7lll - ' BIRTH. • On Sunday last, at Rockley-House, Wilts, the Lady o f Lieutenant-General the Hon. Frederick St. jonn, ot a Sol,. MARRIED. I • On the 25th ult. atWoodbury, in Devonshire, Nathanie l Author Austen; Esq. of Ramsgate, to . Miss - S . oolla Rains, second daughter of Captain Rains, of the Royal Navy. On Tuesday • s'ennight,, MN .1 Bird r , Feiner, of Car ; cliff, to Frances, the - eldest daughter 'of Mi. ChristQpher Williams, of Ely farm. tite,P.ariA - rof Liandatf.. .On Saturday last, Edward Lloyd,, Esq. o - .;' Rhaggatt, the County of 4Vlerionetlr; "CO.:Trances, eldes't daughter of lohn Edward Maddocks, Esq. On aTuesday, at St. George's, Hanover=scluare,. lobo Fyne, Esq. ot.-G rest. Haui,litott, in the. Courity of Hunting . don, to Mary, 'daughter of 1. D. EnglandartiEsq. of New. man-sfreet.. , • , . • . • . The same day, (ohn Butler, Esq. of Tavistock.sgiare, to Mrs. Cockle, of Bath; I. , D/E1). - -.: . - On the 22d22du1t.. at , Knntstorcl; in .Cheshire, Mrs. 0 312(1- '*. field, wife-of Colonel Handheld. • On the 29th ult. Mrs. Parks, wife of Richard Parks, E sc( ' of Laiisclown CrescEnt, Bath. On the3oth ult,at.the Rev. W. G Met's, c;ower"..strect' . Bedford-sqUare, after a long and most painful illness, Miss bullman.. , I. .p n Tlitirklay last, atlaitet,OxfortiShirc, , ,-aged 77; Mr' Jane Smith, reliti of the late Mr. Henry Smith, Attorney ''t , 1 On Friday Igsr,at'Cariiberwell,":Surrey, Walter Burgue. I Esq: aged 78 years:' ",- ' -'" I On Saturday, suddenly, Thomas Lampard, well 'known 1 as Marker of the, billiard-table, Three. Tuns Inn, Windso r : 1 his weight was. 2.1. stone. .. 'ln the Island of %Valcheren, John Walcott Jenkins, o. rto ' h.; - 68th Regimentof Light Infiultry,"forinerly• Lieutenant in t" North Cork Militia. Lately; at HaverfordweSt,' FraneiSEdimardes, Eticl-,, - 0 ,. of t 'The Rev. J,.. 1 .-C. illiams; Vicar - of Clynnog, and 1, ..°;`" t -Llanliairn, Cartiank.nshire. • - . " *.\lr''.- On Sunday se'nnight,.at,Maker, Plymouth, age& 4c , Bletwerhassett, a c-ar relative of' 0r ; k;vidsmit tr, and Ciall C ter 01 .. .s.l rs . P rim rose, .ode qt'`he - ticromes mentioned l M r Vicar at Vsf4lcAkici. • ':' "' FR ICE OF STOCKS ' • . YI:STERD ' AY . ' I India Stock, • , India ,Lie:;ds, 245. 255• 1 1 ' ; . Exch. FOL., 12S. 15 5 ' 1j ; 6 3 finperial 3 pet Cent. 67 t Ditto Ann. Cotis. for Opening, 70 i i Bank Stock, Navy 5 per Cent. • 4 per . Cent • g 4 ii 3 per Cent 691 i 3 pet,Cent..Cons, Bank L. Ann. 18 9- tiths • To THOMAS TAYLOR, ESq. . No. 9, New Bridge-Street; London. Honnured Sir, , • v Edinburgh, Match IR, lgot. I BEG leave to inform you, that ever since th; year 1790, I have been atiliCled with the 'Liles Verie-,. rea - which, from its obstinately resisting every cAprse of Medicine prescribed by the. most eminent of the Faculti here, and undergoing several severe courses of salivation, and twice discharged from the Hospital, with little relic t : would appear to be of the most inveterate nature. 'in th e spring of last year my disorder had got to such a head, a! nearly to ptit'a period to my existence—l had a large nic e : on the crown of my head , one on each arm, and m y 1' were broke out in, a frightful manner ; my right WAY CI , C 3LI : fully and had been in a Stan, of ulceration tor t' ; '" 0 last, seven years; ".y left had also two large nodes ,on it, was very much discoloured, and gave me 'such excrirtiat ing pain, particularly when warm in bed, as nearly to ti c ' prive me of rest ; in this lamentable state, I was recom mended by - Mr.' J. Thompson, (who received so great cure by them here), to take your Leake's Patent which I began to dp),on the 26th of May ; in the course of. avfortnight, began to .receive. benefit—in little more 'than a ' month, the ulcers on my herd and arms were soundly healed—boon after, the sores on thy legS h ea led also; leaving, however, consluerable discolouration in thgt skin, and pain in the bone of the lett, which, by the Bles; sing ol'C..od, and a little longer perieverance in your lava. , luable Medicine, subsided; the nodes dispersing, the ship regaining its natur4l hue, and the notiurnal pains grad,rallY going of 1 thus became, by your liberal aciviCe and Me dicine, perkttly tree trorn all my former complaints -- have recovered my former spirits and strength; and am be come jolly and laz, in which state navingcontinued months to the astonishment of all who knew me, I ant at a lossin what terms_ to express my gratitude, but beg Yot forlhe good, of other- , sutiering mortals,, to mane this rflY case as public as possible, as I 311d11 Oil every o ccasi , !l l4 in so doing, you will greatly Nblige, Sir, your gratetuli 'obedient, very- horrible servant, 'AL R.X. MURKE Swan's Close,' High-street, Edinburgh. - WitnesSes to the above Cute : - . fourt .Ttio'roirr.o:;, NO. 3, New Poultry Marker; arr.) 1011 N API NTOS H, Old A.ssetubly-Close, V.ditiburgh. Prepared and Sold by the Sule'P.roprietor. I THOMAS Th,YLOR, ;Member of the Royal GOilege geons, at his House, No. 9, New Brilige-Street, L0n,1011,,t -where, after a constant res!dence of more titan thirty years, in a piaaice particularly directed to. to cute ° i Venereal Complaints and those incidental to the Paco - I , Generation, •with that inviolable seerecy which ,hicrl his, profession should always observe •in stx:il cases, flatters himself, the advice and assistance fee. gr.ttuito , o lY e. administers to persons taking • this Medicine, will , `l, esteemed, by a- discerning Public, as advAntagcs dotn attainable and void of all ambiguity. • • n f Also sold, by his appointment, lot the convenienc e those living at ,a distance, at the Perfumer's, No• 35. Alban's-street, fall-Mail ; the • Toyshup, No. to3o ord-street;. Disborough's, No. 7, Fi s h-street-hil ly Mt. Steel's, Bookseller, No..i, lit:lion-tow, Little Tor c r ; hill • Mr. Baxter's, South-b - ri4e; Edinburgh; Mr. I,°l„y -donald, Glasgow ;• Mr. Bull, Datne.Street, Dublin; an il ,A Out person in every considerable town in. Great Ireland, in Iso3ies of only es. 9d. each; sealed up wil l and plain directions, whereby persons ot either sex cure tnetnselveS wan ease, speed, secrecy, and s afety • 'N. 13 - . Eyery Box sold in Great Britain is sealed , LIP a—Stamp, on which, by favour or the, - C.ommissu' ne ` N l,v‘: printed, at the Stamp Office—" T. Taylor, No• 9,v o it l eoi Bridge-street," ---to imitate which is Felony, and all are Couldetteits. . RICHARDSON , V. WATTS. Mr. GARBow stared this (6 be one of the•,most in famous casesthat ever came before a Court of Jus tice., 'lt was a pity that, the Court had no power to order the Defendant to ipe whipped. He kept one of those tomes !, h take in sailors when they ar rive after a long voyage, and also young women to be their temporary wives, supplied them abundantly with ardent, spirits, but he had'a great ohje6,tion to supplying them with malt liquor. He refused it to the Plaintiff when she was parched with thirst, on which, they quarrelled, and she went away. Neat LONDON : Printed by RICHARD HARRIS, of No. 4, Martlett-&y,irt, 80%v-street ; and Published by WILLIAM AR MIG E R SCRIPPS, South Molton.street, G oPiieric axquare, At 1k SUN 4 9I 7 FICit, No. , lie, Strand; where Advertisements; Orders for the TaPer. Letters for the Editor, Vic. (post-Paia), must laco address,?d.