The Sun. — London, England, 1808-02-24 00:00:00

ttv. 4 1 REPORT. COURT OF Fr.u, 21. Tfll KING V. RICHARD WAT3ON. „i, information the Defendant, I for v;atin•_; letter a to Gen. Francis: c',,,,,,yntse, and also for endeavouring to pro» volx that Cli,ifisteman'te enallenge him to ticht a duel. • :• \Jr. GAO/WY, for the prosecution, -said, that the ,Detenriant had originally held fhiii . arik'of Lieutenant telonel in his Majesty's: servide, and was dismissed 'by a sentence of a •Court-martial in the year i 193, of the lirosectstor eras the President. _in the year f t 597,1 he l'i oseeni or receiv&l' a letter,- signed Shock 'Sam, from the - Wenitii)ilt; in Ihe following ternt; ; ” Dear General i I have left you in. my will bon!. -for a5:.4.10i-ts , ; , ; nie •In cheating the"publie of 50,0001. `and - h ;4;111. AV'. behaviour in effeeling your re-: treat from- the 131ock C House, in America, besides 4natiy other aastonwillainous to mention." Sotrie time Afterwards,:General G Wynne I•etvived Andther letter, •tiireded to him At the Kings Mews, whitth WAS:%IS follows::—" General, ..I see by the Papers that you 'attended his M”-----y:to the Chapel Royal, , and re- • •ccived th sacranienc. Haw date you; you villain, it, he flee of your Creator; after the tis'oiv y ou ; have been guilty. Of; On this side the , -vra , courage, and blow your brains out, if you have any; and rid. the-World- of a scotm ,drel and it cowintl, Send the poor. woman,, at the 'Three, Tons, Croyden, some money for ruining her .daughter, semi for the quantity o(gin and water. you • ow e her p 7 room„score. , : The first time ,1 meet you i: Will kit k your -----," The General like wise received a tlind,letter, signed " i," in which he. %vas termed a traitor to his country. In eAdition La these, 00 the : l,3th of May )(Ist General Gwynne was riding along Jixtord-street, in coin : iiany with Colenet Cooper, when he was met by the Defendant, who, pointing a stick 'at him; Said, "'YOU are Gen. Gwynne, and were PrtAdent of that Cern t Martial' which took zisk:av Iris property an d 'bread t'rdm ;" then stepping backwards; he -' 166,1 , , hii.stick in the'air, and exclaimed, " You ate a scoundrel and a reseal, and I will go into this shop and post you as,stich." Get i eral ireposed to the different la4ls,i tttul likewise to tile band-writing of the Delesidant, , pit-hough the latter had evidently endeavoured to dis. gni,to 'Cot. Frederick Grey Cooper ,gave•eyidenee • , to tthsi , ; transaftion- -in Oxford-street,: and Capt. Johnllant also sivore• to the hand-writing of the -Defendant.• - • . • . • Mr. MARKYAT •addresEed the Jury for 'the Ili!--.• , :fcudant,s and contended, that it: was'•obvious that the Defendant hid no intention re provoke General -Gwvnne,to a duel ; because, although afterthe're biipt•Of firsLlettor, the General had advertised th.ii the 'author would avow linewit, it should be answered; yet he,had uever stepped faftNal d tore : caive:the sat;sfaction which' was thus offered him. .As to the heels, be contended that there was no evideni•e. to the hand-writing sufficient toindueethe Juty‘to fitvi the Defendant guilty. Ei.f.Ktll3oltollGit said, that the two questions for the Jury were—tst,. whether the •Defendaut was th author ut timiibels in question ? 2d, wile. tiler he intended to provoke the Prohecutor to chal leti!,;c biro to tight a duel ? Ai to the in•iit point, it would bean instill to .coininou , enste to doubt fur momerd that they were and two witnesses • h,.A positively sworn, that they Were' wriiteu by the Defendant.; With resdcet . to the secopd question, there could be, as little doubt that the Defendant's cbjed was such as ty.as : alledged in the information. —Verdict, Guilt.,; I , . • . THE XING. V., SAMUEL DOUGLAS. This was a prosecution at the. instance. of - the Dowago . Countess ofilchester,.against the ljefend 'anti-, for obt.iining.tn'oney upon false pretenses. Mr. GoilHsx stated, that the Defendant had held the:situatikin - of port: at the White Nurse Cellar, and was etnployed to care a basket of fish to the -lion,o of „Lady Itchester, ih Old Burlington -street, the of 'which was 6s. 6d. Instead of ',re ikvit sum, the Di.-!tondanttnade out a false ticket, and obtaioed• from her Ladyship's butler vs. tot. ageoutitiug with the book-keeper at th - eintt fur 6A. 6d. Only. ' Thomas ilarris, butler to the Prosecutor, proved the necessary tatts.--Verdic, THU BISHOP OP IIIIIIII.LNI U. AS ItICITA nr.AUL MONT, ESQ. ANIi HIS WOE. • This was , an iSsiae &meted from the ' Court of ' Chancery.' V 7 Nave 'often ,befet'e' had •StellC the proceedings it this cause. Mr. W A lirfil4; - Wllo' open , :d' the pleadins; said, that the issue stated, that t‘vo di t wepws'o,,, wet . , held the Maintific and' Mr. J. Fd.tsintis iu ‘vhich Certain rttdre'sentation , were made by the the ninth Fitt of the lead orcr W. ,, reade.Mines, in . the County of ` ' land, to which Dr. Barrington was' entitled as iiitiiiol> Durham. It'was aitici to he represented to the 'Right Reserentirceldtc", that 92h1. was the 'loll 'anti til V:1111(!01 Ailr Elia! IS F : lixre of kad ore at 'the time of the . 1: he Bishop 11)..tt thk icprenntivion -was tudde, and winch Aptt..Art ion was eoPOtr';o:iiineCilly the Defendant. Tilere 'W:I4 21 - 10t1ier nount, in Whien it AViis said, that 9r251. NAMH more- dint the %%One, which Was, in thtT ginne man aer,, and by 11,.N. o.,itle parties,. avert ett antfc4n , tradOed. Lord and,'.Vr. Baron W . 900 and :sat on the t c; ; c.)n the ptrt: Ot the t!idit.inf, s,r ft,omi - ta,y, front the Courtof ct jA , :d ;,y :tic:fort , IN (t MO NI 1 - .ll,Orri cuildnthed ttit catt e,. tln behalf cat the Defendants, AT- N 1; tAt is and Mr. G - ititittiw by Mr, Bk. 1.1-, aisO from the opposite sick! ' t.4 the fir Stoativa. ROMIT,Ls: very bricils. , biLr.c,l • of th, cwco. fi!s , :oi) of Dorhlto, et to ti,c veri•ttivtis I,)etvvalri J. 131:2,,kctt Prehite; the ' Otte ' h.:, (a,tie. at litiktilen, i (itlwr at the time of a vrtetine of the tio I : 31 4 dt ,itCe WZZ:i (fi the diva, stattid in he pleadiapi. that A lt . 131a‘.;kett had said, wii t ol . Ironouy.,:trot (;011. LONDON : Prultcd Ac die SUN -Ui science .were Appenie'd tg. ,by, t i),Bisitop, that .1) Hilt atinind caliie of the iiintn :s. e bare t t lcad, ore was 9251. ; or that such stun was ritore.than tile value. The ATTORtb , , , I-OENEBAt, in-a very 1441 address to the .lary, stated the nature of mining concerns and hunzited, that the- witness had entirely forg,,tten what had passed at the two iDterviews.referred to. He then called the Gentleman who was party to the conversations. -• • Mr: John Erasmus Blackett, during a long exa mhLition, strialy contcadia,,d,, the evidence of Mr. EMMA, a:iscrting, ; that ha neithev,did say nor could ',say, that 9251. was the fail value of, the Bishop's ninth share of the lead ore, but .admitted,,, that .he said, that such annual rent was a fair equivalent for such ninth shave, under all the risks. and difficulties attending, the working of the 11111:2ti. Thel,yituess • said he was eighty-one years of TheATTufcg On the occasion of th i s' contlitaing testimony of two respeaable witnesses; proposedM call sonic honourable person to.give , testi.l niony to,the clhiralaer of his own witness, on the authority, of : the case. of D,ne, on .the: deniise of tephenson u. Walker, befOre ,Lord-,Chief:Justice Mansfield ;..bat the Noble and Learned Judge said, that he . was , most confidently .of. opinion, that, there was no colour, or pretence for adducing such testimony._ . Atte( Sir SAMUEL RoMMLY had replied, and Lord Et,t.i.n , tuoa.onon. had summed up the evidence, the Jury retired, and at five o'clock, atier deliberating betwc,!en two and three hours, found a verdiCit for the t ) laintiff. It is not improbable, ~*hat the circa:, of thiS deci sion will be tO the amoluit,ol 0n,000.1. or .perhaps more, in favour of the Bishop of DURHAM. C . . 0 Qat r COMMON l' S, 23, KENT ELECTIOFI. SLR WILLI '001).,V Bur. Cross-jminedly Ser,jeant BEST. Said he canvassed for both ;he Plaintiff and De fen,iant after Ow I7th at' Joly, as many of s-fhp votes would not poll for the Defendant alone; and _would insist on.. *baring the Plaintiff's ribbon in their hati. )), Mr, Hill proved that he paid 301. ,for bringing (lawn voters, frivuds of the Plaintiff, to vote for the Defe:A!nt, which was repaid hiM by Mr;Clarkson,. the of the Plaintiff. Mr; William iilenkensop deposed; he. wasitYthe interest of-the :I"laintiff, on the Pealon, and closed tie COmmittee at Rochester owthe 17th of July, the Plaintiffhaving. polled a sufficient number of votes to insure his eleOion ; but on the day following he was induced to open it again, Ind go to London, by the pirsuaiiOn °fa Mr. Ganning, one of the Defendant's Committee. Serjeant SttEPHEED.here closed his case. .• Serjeant BEST, .forthe. Defendant, said he would . semi, put an end to the evidence .of the last Wit ness, fdr he would prove, by Mr. Gentling himself, that he was net One of the Defendant's 'Committee. 'Besides, a intember of the Cemmittee ha&no right to make such;an engegeMent for the .Delendant and if he did make it, it would not be binding on the Defeddant. There . was ito kind of proof that the ''Defendant, or a majority of the Committee, had ever assented to such a proposaL Leavine• all Jaw out of the question, he would - engage for the Noble *Baronet,. his •Client, that if it had been . proved;' 'that either he, or the majority of his Committee, liad• consented o such an ;agreement, ,he would feel 'himself bound in honour to gice:up all defence,—lt was not the money that his Client reecrded, it Was hiS lionour.—He had pledged bitnself to the Incle :pendept Freeholders of the County of. Kent, on the Independent Interest lone;a he was neither a:Whilk -• or Tory ; he had pledged himself not to be biassed by any party ,of men, but to vote the Nvay his con r , :science dirceted ; • and ddrit*.the time lie, remained ; in Parliament,' k e pt that avowal, 'The Plaietifr• was set up by the \Vltig party, ,and the other Can..: didate by thi. AilioWerial patty, and Was it to,be •outto his snpnorters, that by an indiscretion.of one of les Committee he. lald departed trans the line•ol, eonirea professed -by him, ;Ind jeiried• the Whig party i He believed there was no nein et whoin his Client had a higher opinion than he had of the Plain- ‘ tiff, at a_ptivate Gentleman, hot he did not admire • and woUld,soon,7r have to ttheiEleaien than it . shoulA.:be - thooght Ile had entered into a coalition with the Plaiiitiff;'l3l,ltit was not attempt-i ed to be proved that he had, for every transaction that had been proved, happened between the friends of the parties, How the Plaintiti contrived to, make 1 , himself a principal in this 'aloe, he did not under stand, and felt that the adion must fall to the groded. , 'The fury could not . forget the late Me •motable action of a Cormuittee-man on an 1 4 :ledion. Frost., who came into that Court to support •: his iniquities,to ' prove charges - for keeping back withesses,: (as he called - it;) CO frustrate itistice;this alone fought to be' sufficient • to teach them how fir Candidates ought to. be bound by 01641'C:is of della bif Comm' ttegi t „, ' ••• -. • Mr.' Larkan, one of the - Dc., , feidarit's Committee, depbsed, Witt , he did-nOt iecolled any conversation . with Mr.• Lee on the' t 7th . of ; .but on Sunday, the day following, M'r. Lee and Mr. Shove called-on him, When sorne conversation passed 'between them, • of .which he .had taken minutes.--They said they thought tlie,Piaititjtf sate, at I.yished.to bring in , the befecinnt. Witness answered, • the Committee i•• would be very glad 'of any votes they would give them ; but there could; be no coalition with the !. Plaintiff. Mr., Lee said it was impossible there. could be any i;ontiMion as toexpence, as : the Plain- Willed polled as', many votes . as he Wanted ; and added, atilt be Wei 'not authorised to enter into any •agreement about expence. On 'a queition from the saith,he did, inform Mr. Shove that lie woad-pay'all.vote'rs whom they brotight, that voted fiat the Defendant inatead of Sir-Edward KnatchbUll 4 . but that they should be paid immediately, .as he would have no bills. • . On his cross-exattlination by'Serje'ant Shwa u kttri, ,Wittiess said he did intend the vOter , ! - should apply 'personally for their expellees, but nine ever Caine; did think himself the repreSentative of the Defend ant, a far as bout one of his Cominiwee they con ducted the whore business of the Eledion. Vorster said, he was one / of .the Defendant's Committee; did not consider an ad of an indiiidual . of the COmtnittee binding on the whole ; he Would,: not have accepted votes from the Ptaintill,,, and Wye* • paid for theiti, - but would accept them from.the friends of the Plaintiff.. Lord Chief justice AIANsv/ru.r) observed, ,that Was as : nice a distinktion as a' Jesuit could, make.--; He recomtnended it strongly to the parties to leaie the case, even in its 'present state; to a refcrence. Serjeant. 81LEPUIgit1), fur the Plaintiff, was 'per fectly agreed. Serjeaut BrsT, for the Defendant, declined. Mr. Ganning dep6ed, that he never did-consider himself as one of the Defendant's committee, he might have been considered so by others, 'as he was one t ,of the poll.inspectors for -the Defendant. n ins eross-eitatnination, said he believed the Defendant would have lost his EleCtiow, if it had : not been for the friends of the Plaintiff. Scrieant.Sticrunan replied in a very able atid animated -speech. lie observed, that het Lordship would.lat'orrn the Jury That .a Candidate .had a right, , tg .pay the expellees of the Eletiors on their vvar.to the poll ; that -it had been. fully proved` everrvoter eharged for voted for the Defencmt,— He could nothelp feeling sorry, that the Delt•odant had been advised to defend the cause. He had 'a better opinion of the -Noble Baronet than to sup-•: pose it was his Own aa. He concluded by cibs6fv.:• Mg, that. - he felt confident . the Court and Jury) agreed with him, that . the Plaintiff ought to have a verdia • . - Lord Chief Justice NTANSVIELD StIIIIMed up the evidence with his ,, usual plecisiott, and observed, that if the.Jory.w4ire- of ,opiolon that th Plaintiff ought to have a verdid, ,they Would give it for the s um laid in the declaration, as.tife items must be !eft t o a reierence. - - The Jqry returned a Vih . clia for the Plaintiff,Ah . M.' „ subjiqi to a re ternia% -„ r , d Bow-s rRE ET.----Yesterday, and the dar•preceding, Mr. READ, the ChicrMagistrate of this was much occupied -with the, i case of. a forgery \ to -some extent: on the charge of : Mr. Gibbons, of-Great Russel-street, .Maclachlia„ a Cabinet-manu 14durer, late. of Drory-lane, a litinkrupti; _the in quiry included a char, - ;e against the partner iii a re spet:table,house ter knowingly concealing thi felon after his knowledge of tlO:felony. On the latter charge•Nn. Gibbons and witnesses Were bound Over to prosecute. • • PLJAIC OFFICE, HATTON, GARDEN. Thomas . Watson was coniniitted for re-exantination, charged with wrenching brasS knockers from several -Gentle,. mens' doors, between the; hours of twelve and five o'clock in the morning. He waslletetc.ted stealing the brass knocker from the door' of Mr. Littlewood, in Lamb's Couctuit-itreet. kethirul,ir circumstance occurred •11 sbOrt time ago iri ihe - neigithourhoott. of •Haydon-Bridge, which is .well worth recording, not only on•aceounr ..ot-Nthe. rascality of the person in,plicated - thert.ia, hit alt,o for his ingenuity. A butcher in liexh-an., who I .# `taken a field of'turtfii,,by the N ' V&Ck ot.a fanner,. -ttn: ,the purpoie of feeding sheep therein, Was stirprisii.: on "frequently visiting , ifis stock, to find . the sheep • ,always in .a stubble:field adjoining. Wotido44 'what could induce them-to prefer such a pis4.4e - 1 4 , , - the turnips,, he axle phisoed • f o c k vard irort) road, in order to ascertain the c i iuSe of• this ruiner • .menot, When„ to his astbnisitineut, help:A•clin= 4 4l" cur dog, wilh a . ha'soii of milk b e f o r e . in the gap beiwtvti ,the,turttip field apd...1)0 sto 64 pasture, so that — wbehevtir the the dog frightened then] ;baLk. ILA; the,aty!tri not been thus diss'olid,..the. - sherip ,te mained there for eVer,' before tht blitefier s objLfc4, . viz. the'fatteoin r of his sock, wou ld hiveb‘Ntvat . tameld , . • _ Yeiterday morning, almut two o'ilotkohe.sho? ,winclow.of Westolinhtel-r,uact, "broken vi:on, and 31,11 'ye; t,uanlits of glare SUIP NEWS. • CR'A.V 41; 6, F. i ' 0.12:0 A "• • Passed by.-I:l.4Nrptutv.:. Sancti—the f,t• ~,., '‘'- • a/611ra ••• ' On the 2,10i116t. at 13Ougittimi-li:ittseolic Wife 6r vvillues Fleury I)otive. (Aa u • Fri , lityl:tst. at his in 'Upper Harteyi•• • •iire. 6l ": -I f c '"" LA4 uI Sgf I.lviiry atil.irtin ISeit,..c/a. 0341ghter- ••• • " Al Ali 011.)-,Af clay • last,' .at Pareinnn, •Ailr,T.llarnev, to Miss dAligliter of Chat, 4;+i. I,le of Mail) hi thr R( , y4l Wavy: l i atety, Ilocatt,.•of WC YT snout 11. 1 -:1-if week, the f!ev. t. 'Utarkei-, of Waliste.44, to 11.1iis'• Ellza Knowles, ot . thw bArne .-• • • • , ei!,4rlE. (Jr vzsrel _'.!.. RDA li . t - i;ck, 232 2314 tFgxy poi. cent 96 a 97 4 Pal . C 4li t• 11 . 2 1 I rkfter Print. Re4..644 ipet e ent • Con. 63 Bank. .ong,/rjuf. 18 i-t6tlis Ditto Short Ann. jndia Stock, 470 India BUDC:S, ZS. EXODOCI. Hills, part,P , 0 indium, 3 i . pr. 1 nipertsi 3 ;..cr Cent. 77 Dito Ann. 7 t• :fail. CODS. for 2; i-tt in3r.:1514 HICU WATER AT i.006.0/si . URI DC E"fb- M°H Morning, 3e min, after ‘t 4 „ .") l l A V itcrnoo ' n, .s 'l mitt : • .411.141. KEt 4( --WAT 4 i I ) I-lEALTkIs * 17 . has been, too ; frequently the. SubjeA ofjtist and . J. general reprobaticnai teat inen'desttfutt taitric 'the modkal art have oflt;re. , ,t themselves as .c...inlia:Ate s public: pat cottage in. the physic.' 1• or the porl'at of doing io.,t ice to the result (gout' Steidle', and cx perience , to prevent us from those ern pirics wttote g , -- In mns tprudent preteio unfortunantly .t . :4 o.:retY , 1.)171 :' too favourably received, we beg . leave b , Submit to the iber". and enlightened a t'ailitrtil statement o f ••ur p . ,ll • ;;Li , t; arid sa. quirentents. Aftei hiving received a Ngtilar 'c'tucli tion as the pupils of Messrs'. t. raid it iii dl ledurgs and.praetiCe we..Garefully ittend..al, p r ofes4)rs'alid. surgeons of the J.tandon Hospital • 'we entered ouraanves students in that justly celebrated sjkool for inedit:ai ;acquit:4- .wpm, the Royal °College of I..t.linbuigli, and were instruciat in the different branches of aliaio:»y, rAery, the theory and ' pridice of pity'sic, cheirlistry, invtwi.fery,' botatiVi by those eminent professors, l)rs. 'alonro, Gregor)`, Hamilton l)uncan and Rutherterd. the trust we .011a1 1 nor badeemeri presumptuous in s.iying it' tr our proficieney varA acquirements are not ni t 3),,,,i,L.rat,i,?, lor ii long s . cri'f' dit , ort . ft of years made Venereal o.omol.iioN,m ,, li of Debi'oty, the particii.,r- ,J 1 it will, we hope, t ;a we navi: srlireit supeust know ledge of their troat mein and core, f lii hi'and reectrz' cases at infettiun • Pctfed ri.est,iblishment ! ti completed ha', the short period of es:4odays ; and in those ot •the utmost tat veteraer, where other lara..tdi 111Ve faUdd 13f SUCceSS, proper pewverance in our plan ;at treatintint ensures to the patient a sate and radical cure, • .. Amidst the - tuel6ncholy variety of disorders ‘vhi , h . ste•tu' ''. eflbetsof a habit long 'and motir unnairtOly 1)66:1en by tilt?: youth of both sexes, thtue are ' n•nie more ,ilarnittn; . or tutu distressil; (I,..tiLi...llcics anti:debilities which (14 " qUeutly prevent or embitter the rtiAltiiii)tirii state. "to suet pcisoos it must be a coosolatoo knoN, rh.tr they mayrroWs .by x new and infallliale ;0•,..1e or rt...atmcw, be restored to that gr4AVst ca all human blessingi, 0 - 1"4)11., y, and vigor'' out cUlist it tioit . lit ' . iron% "ivltaEC ver cattseatisittA as w:'11 as in •;very . itacelcoss rw. may be tOt ix. ; %•:! -:( with the gro!it. est secrecy and honour. I i•, .; at. hotne 'f row ten tothree, and Atm 6in th even:- ! •!. • o. bight. , , Patients in the-country .:n.t . tetit. • , r Az the particu in- rats ta th;nr case, age, and general I. !. , ace. .k.c. closing a re.iiitt :.• • 1 !, .; wow"' tiwsa' t ' e will be . ,•; • To .. 16 " 11 ; ,- ,e...rczy ,DLIT lin t P c ' sre g e'd) letter; :nay ailed IL! ucil•o:t :;:r ineUt.ce.y:s. CURRIE and C.') Stirge.mi,, 4-7. eort.„ , 'lntl CO, n-icit Ccrtifwates fro" , , """!-' rm;>;l - 4 11 •4e London and ion how Oita wniCti AtAchfns'duzies clorio,; ; the cur rttoy i e they al el'i ;11,4 Lego-res ,;;Ki Pia * AZ GLAU cotsn A. P This' was an aaleti brought ~ by the Plaintiff to recover the ,stun of t2OOOl. which ' was' paid by him on necOunt . a the expellees 'of electors tor : the Detentlant.--Scijeatit Sit EPH Eltb' 011ted the; case, 'and' Observed, it was: one Of those that ought met:el-301)e brought into 'a COUrt of Lattil.': It •was ;'A ease here'the honbh`r •of men . of rank Was en - •gagyd4. hod when they departed in ;iny way frbm '"thatpritciple,'Colarts• of Law could iii define; tint in this case he Wbuld•shew, that it did noveptire ly depend' on 'a• point of tolteur ; 'he 110 ) ,rd to be able to• prove to the Court "and Jury this case came under the CoMmon Law, and if hi.; instrthaions were trne, , !to• the very teehnical terms .of tho'-Law. The •Plaiiititf'!Was a Candidate for'' , a seat in•Tarlia meet, as Representative -of the'Comity . ' of 'Keot, in 802 . ; the Defendant Witt- alto • a Ctindickto- ,- -there wtis a thiCd Candidate„ Edward.. Ku3tchbeill. ..['Rose three GentrenterCimt lovtlitheir''claitris to the Freeholders 'of , Kehl' oti different •rotuldS,L.— • On the 17th of July;TheTtlemds and: Cotninittee of 'the Plaintiff found - . .that - - he , had , <r sufacient, number of Electors i polled to • insure his elefrliOn;. and • they gave' direetions to bate the post carriages tstopt, 'And' the ditfeeent • 'houses opened . : fOr the reception of lileelors to be . closed. An' under,' standing imMediately took place bet wee! the Corm' , millet: of the Dofendant and Ok. of the'Plifintiff, that il'they would countermand the order for stop ping the post-ehrmises, and dosing the houSes of entcrtainment, and would , 'use their interest ,to get the remainder of - the •Eleaors :that would ince 'for the Plidutiff, to vote for the Defendant, the ,fondant wonld•pay the expense. This. Was assented to by rho friends of the Plaintiff ; .140 .the fact waS, that the Defendant was returned as.. a . " Membe r; althonglyat . the:time-this understanding took place the'moiLstrenuotts friends of the 4.) , lendant thought he should have lost I he elea ion, he being so larbehuid Sr; Edward Knatelmbull on 'the poll ; 'and although the Defendant was censeious he owed his return to Parharnent to the friends of the Plaintiff, he' did come into that Court to. contend, that the Plainriir ought to pay time .expencvs , of his cleaion ;- his Client had offered to leave this cause on the first, onsetto arbitration, and was. even at the presentino •mene Willing it should -go. before .an a'rbittatdr, which the liefendant had declined; but he' trusted! tlfat the Jury, by the verdict they would give, would 'make him repent of his 'obstinacy.' , • The Learned Serjeant Thep proceeded to call his . t nesseA. Mr. Richard Lee 'deposed, that he was a•friend of the Plaintiff, and one of his Committee for con duEting the eleaion for 'Kent in 'tgo. Tn conse- Auence of a great majority being' in , favour of the Plaintiff, , his Committee thought it - adviseable to stop canvassing, looking on the eleaion cif the PLintiff . ,as certain, fie, in company \vitt, a Mr. Sh4ve„ on the 17th 'of July, called: on Mr. Larkau, Pile of the Defendanei Committee, and informed him, that the friends of the' I'Llintitf thought him secure, and wished wSup . port . the De fetnkini inTreference to Sir Edward Nnatehbul4 it he would he at the expcnce of the voteri.couning ( 1 64' 11 , t his he joyfully acquiesced my as the Coin fmittee was in despair 9f the success of the pe.fr -fondant,- and appointed, ,the next day to meet theha, 'The}i• met on the following day, and Mr". 1.40 , til positively agreed to pay whatever exiienee might ineurrc.'cl, but observed, that the Plaintiff tiOt etipea any second votes of thy De feridant ; on which the Witness replied, that they elicl not want theM. Oft his crois 7 exaMination by . Serjeatv lit•sr, he said he pet:la:ay understood the agreement, and had in a dot'l6t.., on: his but - the Defendant was to'have paid whattwer eXpences should. be curryt.l. Bihke proved that the De.fendant's,Comtiiii tee 'weld Inithoritied to . do tvluitever they thought proper, vither jointly or • iieparately, to the On cerni Of tL Lk on They iodivich4ally . gave oida6, and be would have thought himself justi tiYd it, obeying the:. order of any one of the•Cotn- toiI.UAL .•• -=•• • . • `Mr...lobn Barnes, one 'of tiro frien4s of pc th,-.41: on ',the' 17th of 3 1 1iy, he spot. tiie I)::,l'endant about . the as§istanco of tile. Plaiutiff't; friendi, and In.: an.swerea, that ho Jailer tiCe taunt Ix rfurm Bear ttttir proni;sr!"; , , tne veienonnt,„ he c am .. up to I,oinion, and i,eri S number - of,voter 6 •thp, vil sir the eurrisigelf,tia,l• be had to ply' fur. r-,414 , -- by ItiCHARD H A Ritts,t)f No. 4, Wardettlilmit:itowstreet and publistw by N ; A 2,1 m IG 4-s)itth'itlp-Iwn-siree(; C roivenor -sq ',are; Nutt No. Strand; where Advel tisements, wd ers for the Paper, r ettrr, tOr 5c v ,(1.0,/.../190,:ii)utt be addressed. b 'On the Ist inst." Eccles=s.tiect, aged Sa, Airs. Farran, a inaidenl.ady, paternal aunt to the Coon tesSot Derby.. • ,Early on. Thursday morning .la;..ti at his house in South -Shields, William Blackhurn,'-q. SoliotOr'. ' His loss wilt he severely felt, as his exertiops ; pr.? bervc the occasions were unwearied, and his aluiit les of a very superior cat-1. The last aet of his Wits , ',li) grunion 2 the inn:rest or the Ship.° wriers, triend he ew)cr wub, to wimm,he was, extensiv.rbisktiown,-ruiti by whom his lois: fat deeply and deservedly regretted. Lately. in Dominick. street, Dublin, jaunts Kearney, Esq. Attorney. • • On Friday last, age/I (io,' Mrs. Withal!, wife of, the late ,Thonias• Withal, Esq.: of Petition, the County of 1 . ... O ill rey. n Sunday last, Mrs. Cordelia Worth, wife of Sutgedti ~ Worth, of the Savof. . ~ . - , On the 2. tst inst. in lierneri-Street,,john Gordon Mai:kess-, . zie, Esq. a •ur,icon in bo C oltistrtatn Rogotbitt Guard 4. aieci 3P• • • ;• . Yesterday. morning, Mrs'. Wit damsel', 'of.Chapd'srrext, , Bedford-row, widow of thA4,a.te !.;•aptako.:lanie3 W ) ilidrnsoq, 1 of the Gadgcs - Easr..indiarnatt. - , .1