The Sun. — London, England, 1810-05-25 00:00:00

r Ist: stores were kept in no less than 83 different I nidings, - situated in 26 different .streets : these dings were mostly hiretriroin Merchants, and cost Government not less than L6,0001..a year. The House therefore would judge whether, under these circumstances, it :was or was nOt.expedient that these works should be constructed. -In point of fact, however, Lord Wellington did-not carry this, measure into effeet, for when he (Mr. Pole) went to. Ireland; he found it was not eompleted, and be . put the finishing hand tl it. Another charge which the Honourable Baronet had brought forward was, that the Irish Government had superannuated officers, and afterwards employ ed . them in England upon full salaries. Sir JOHN NEWPORT here spoke to 'order, and said, thatalthough he did not -object to the Right Hon. I ,:eirtlemangoing into an explanation respecting Lord - 'Wellington, yet he should object to-his draw ing the •tient'on of the House fi - orn the subject before it; 6 ) . going into other cases. Mr. W. POLE said be would not trouble the ,' :t louse Any more-at present, but he gave the Right . . f!. [on. Baronet notice, that if he did not come forward •Ind substantiate his charges, h e should 'c o n s ider .:.em, and the House would consid e r them, as un ;rounded. The Right Hen. Baronet had preferred lecusations ; if he shrunk frJm the investigation of ii hem, the inferende would be obvious. , ( Mr. CAVENDiSH BRADSHAW explained the man -- ..ier in which th e b a la nc e s rernaining• in the hands [ ' .if Sir Henry Cavendish, at the time of his death, had been paid into the Public Treasury. Mr. FOSTER, Mr. W. POLE, and Mr. CROKER, bore testimony to the exemplary conduct of the relatii-es of Sir Henry Cavendi-h on that occasion. • Mr.. W. SMITH reprobated the ,praelice of leaving such large balances in the hands of public officers. Mr. BANKES could not conceive what claim Sir George Shee had to the compedsation given him. When Lord Kenyon was Attorney-General, be had J ;aid in that House, not only that a public officer ought not to have any longer public balances in his _ possession, but that he should be compelled to pay interest for the time which it bad remained in his I hands. This he thought would be too hard, but be did conceive that stack balances ought to be forth , coming the moment they were required. He cen -stared the disposition which had long prevailed in the various Irish - Governments to show a solicitude for private, and a disregard for public interests, and reprobated the general praCtice of considering rather tile advantages of . individuals in the appointment to official situations, rather than the - advantage of the 1 ' State. The present appeared to him to be a very flagrant case, on which the House ought to pro-, . pounce their opinion, and he should therefore tote . • - for the resolutions of the Hon. Baronet. The CHANCELLOR Of the EXCHEQUER remon strated against the general censure of his Honour able Friend. ln the conduct of the liish Govern ment towards Sir George Slice,- they had proceeded upon long established principles. If those princi-. plea were to be abolished, at least due notice ought 1 1 .:., to be given. Sir George Slice was a political adver sary of the present Government. It was impossible therefore to impute the condo& of Government- to'- t . winds liim...to any improper motive. Rei,erting to' his Hon. Friend's sweeping accusation - of pubic men, and lira declaration of the manner in which sit uations of public trust were conferred,, he dis claimed tor himself any share o( such a general im putation, and recommended to his Hon. Friend, if I \. be bad an speCific charge to produee,_ to brief; it [ forward openly-and without hesitation. , Mr, BANKES explained. Air. H. THORNTON, while he allowed that' the law was liable to a different construction, was yet of opinion that no compensation _ought to have been -- ' granted. , . . Mr. FOSTER contended, that the compensation was granted to Sir Geolge Slice, not for taking away the balances, but fur the per tentage of one per cent. which (by usage, though not by law), be bad re ceived Irian? the Collectors on !the transmission of their balances. . - . - Mr. G. JOHNSTON considered the case 'as little satisfaaory as- any ,he had ever heard, and' was deeply 'concerned to hear it defended as it had been by his Right Hon: Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Mr. W. FurzoEra ere -although he did not profess himself to be ti,e apologist of the Govern meats of Ireland, justified the measure under con- 11 siclerationi' • The SOLICITOR - GENERAL denied that all Receiv ers General who made use of the Public money in i transitu, were consequently criminal. If they were, [ there was not a Receiver-Geneial in the kingdom who had not offended. • : -Mr. MARIOTT allowed that the use of the Pub ' lie Balances had been, and, perhaps, must be per mitted to those in whose hands they lay; but no 1. man had, in his opinion, a right to and com pensation for being deprived of such permission.— He .should support the motion of the Honourable Baronet. Mr. LONG asserted,. that there was not any gafity in the use which had been made a the Ba lances.' Although he did not contend for the pro ptiety of the practice, yet it was well knowri,that it had been generally recognized. Mr. WILB4RFORCE thought Government- ought • - riot to be censured for giving compensation for loss at emolument. His Right Hon. Friend appeared to have been justified in giving the remuneration he had given to Sir G. Shee. . Mr. BARHAM contended that 'no compensation ought to have been given. An understanding miiht exist between an Officdr and - his Colledtor (he would not .say it had been so in the cgse of Sir G. Shee) by whom the money- was paid to Government.-- Under all the circumstances he was of opinion no just claim to compensation existed, in the case before - the House. • Sir G. HILL stated `the emoluments for which the , compensation was given to be fair emoluments, and therefore the loss. of them constituted a just claim to compensation. Sir J. NEwrioser, in reply, asserted, the system I contended for went to enrich the Colleaors at the ,*) uxpence of the Public. If compensation' had ap t } ,6;t_ed due to Sir G. Shee, his Majesty's Ministdrs ...mg,ht to have come down to Parliatnent and stated 1 tii,,t fad to the House. It had been stated, that ruing to Parliament would have made it a perma- nent charge on the Public.. Saying that, a stigma was unjustly cast on the House, as they would not have matte the grant permanent, unless .it appeared to be deserved. He had 'been, said to be - very nice in sifting out such things. While . he sat in that House,, he should ever think it his duty, as a guar- Plian of the public purse, to bring forward any abuses to which his attention might be dire6ted. It had been said, that . Sir G. Shee was not a political friend of the present administration, but it should be remembered, that were .such things as prece dents, and Ministers might find it convenient to make a precedent . of such a nature, whatever the circum stances of the case might be, it was, in his opinion; the duty of Mini-ters -to go .down .to that House, state the whole, and obtain .the san6tion of Parlia ment to the measure they wished to adopt. The House divided, when the numbers were, Ayes - - - '4 B Noes - - - . 99 Majority - —5l THE BUDGET. On the Report of the Committee of Ways arid Means being brought up, Mr. TIEfiNEY rose to übjea to its being received. He knew he was taking an unpopular side of the question: It was said the Opposition wete disap pointed at, finding the Chancellor of the Exchequer proposed laying on no new taxes, and were dis posed to harass Ministers on that account. He did not oppose the Chancellor of the. Exchequer betause he laid on no new taxes, but because, to avoid - it, he resorted to a new sysiem—a system never heard of before, without giving good and sufficient reasons for so doing. The project of the 'Chancellor of the Exchequer was, that 980,0001. for the , service of this year, should be charged on the Consolidated Fund. The grounds on which he had defended this plan were, that having in 1808 laid on taxes •which produced,up wards of 1,200;0001. instead of 106,0001, which they were expected to produce, he.thought he had a right to apply the surplus to the service of this year. The Right Honourable Gentleman, it was true, had called the attention of the House to the subject in a particular manner, and desired them to exmiue and criticise it as it might deserve; This was what he wished to do. Whatever. trenched upon the Consolidated Fund was at war with the principle' of raising as large a sum as possible within the present year. That principle had been approved of by Mr. Pitt, Mr. Addington, and Lord • Henry Petty, and' it remained for the present Chancellor of the Exchequer to break in upon it, The conse quences of such an innovation might be of a serious nature. So averse was Mr. Addington to impover ishing the Consolidated Fund, that in 1802, rather than - do it, he laid on new taxes ; and the - date Ad ministration, rather than trench on that fund, had in curred the unpopularity of raising the Property Tax from six and a fourth to ten .per cent. The Conso lidated Fund was established by Mr. Pitt in 1786, and it did- him great credit.. In all his difficulties, and they were very. great, he never laid violent hands on the Consolidated Fund, but resorted to any,ex pediait io preserve that inviolate. He . (Mr. T) did not know whether the surplus of the Consolidated Fund amounted to four, five, or six millions ; but the surplus should every year bear some proportion to the taxation, It, in . 1792, the surplus amounted to two millions and a-half, it-.was not .extravagant now to exped it would be five millions. Of this he had ticr- Very sanguine expeetations. He • begged the .House 10 bear in wind that the produce of the taxes which now, swelled the Consolidation Fund would not be so, great in times of peace. He thought it his duty to implore the Houie to considerwhat they did, before they by any ad:diminished the Con solidated Fund. He would take a view of the last five years, and .see how it stood; In 1805 and 6 there were real and. efficient taxes laid on. In 1807, 8, and -9, there were hardly any. . The charges on the Consolidated Fund in those five years amounted to 5,732,0001. The produce of the taxes to meet those charges was - 6,437,5001. leaving a surplus of no more than 706,0001: But it might be said, why did he selea tlioseyears ? He was willing , to take from the het - rimming of the war, but- from a paper before the House it appeared there was a deficiency of 314,0001._ in the years 1805 and 6. To make good that deficiency, they were obliged to go to the surplus of 1808, sa that taking 790,0001. from the Consolidated Fund, as proposed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, it would be found there was but a surplus of 706,0001. to meet this new charge. From the establishment of the Fund in 1786, there never before was so low an excess of taxes carried to the Fund in five years. If he were to take the state of the Consolidated Fund from 1802, the surplus would be 1,287,0001. From this, deducting 970,0001. as proposed by the Chancellor of the - Exchequer, the 'total of the remaining surplus would be 317,0001. To such a .proposition he thought no rational man could agree, as it was evident the Consolidated Fund ,could not bear the charge. Every Loan Bill bad a clause charging the payment of the loan on the Con solidated Fund, thus giving security to the lenders on e that Fund: The projeet of the ChancelloV of the Exchequer, he- contended, went to evade the 26th of his - present Majesty, and place the Sinking Fund in jeopardy. A variety of other evils N'vould arise from entertaining the projea, of the Chancel lor of the Exchequer. If the whole surplus arose' from taxes laid on,by the Chancellor' of the Exche- Tier, he would not admit that he had a right so to draw on the Consolidated Fund, though ) in that case, he would have a shew of reason on his side, which, in the present instance was wanting.' As a man, he would refer the subjea to the Chancellor of the Exchequer himself; and if he did not come down (as a Member of Parliament) and say the 'Chancellor of the Ekcehquer ought rather to lay on taxes to the amount of 750,0001. he (Mr. T.) was as much mistaken as ever he was in his life. He (lid not wish that new taxes should be laid on, he wished some othermeans of meeting the exigencies of the case might be devised; should some other plan be proposed, though it might not meet with his en tire approbation, he promised the Right Hon. Gent. that he would not harass him with useless opposi tion. He then went on to censure the proposed plan, which he condemned in terms of strong re probation. He was not placed in a pleasant situa tion, when he differed with the Chancellor of. the 'Exchequer in not imposing new taxes. The Right Hon. Gentleman h4l done nothing ; he had com pletely lived On the last Administration. The whole of bil taxes produced only'32o,oooL it Was 'not Up- - re'a',onatire to ask what he had done in the space of almost four years. He had been num fortunate, but at the same time was fatally extravagant. Be fore the Bill was adopted, he implored the House to consider maturely every - circumstance and every obje6tion he had urged. - Mr. nose observed, that the Right Hon. Gentle man had totally misconceived the statements of his Right. Hon. Friend. The sum of 1,200,0001. partly arose from the new and partly from the oil taxes. There was• beside an augmentation on duties of 20,0001. Na one net deficiencies with more firm ness and resolution than Mr. Addingtoe did, parti cularly in- 1802, when beimpOsed nevrtaxes. It was the duty of Ministers. to•prepare for the worst. If they were to take the War Taxes, he asked, could it not be learned, by a simple computation, how short a way they- would go ? Retrenchment should certainly be niade, but then it ought to be consist ent with the safety of the country. The Right Hon. Gentleman said that the Minister had broken the system established by Mr. Pitt. On the•contrary, he was-convinced that he would have aeted in the same way, which assertion was corroborated by the last conversation he had with him, which was on that shble6l. Mr. TIERNEY, in explanation, stated, that he did not say that he approved of taking - the 'War Taxes. Mr. Hu§Kissom agreed in the arguments of the Hon. Gentleman. He was convinced that the sal vation of the country depended on the retrenchment of establishments, and on making exertions to bring the loan of the year within the Sinking Fund. On 061ober i nth, 1808, the amount of the duties on stamps was 33,0001. which in the next . year increas ed to menormousoool..an enormous difference, and in the course of e years there was. a flUauation in the Con solidated Fund of 4 millions. The Hon. Gentleman then entered 'into a clelail of Financial. difficulties, ftotn the year 1797 to 1810. He wished to see the amount of the Wan and the Sinking Fnnd equaliled ; the proportion the surplus of the Consolidated Fund bore to the whole ought to be looked into. He hoped the House would allow that there was a ma terial difference, between improvement and taxa-, Lion. . The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER declared he never rose with more confidence to justify the eon duet of any measure than he slid on the present oc casion ; 'and indeed he felt in his mind the strongest convi&ion that if his illustrious and lamented friend; was now to stand_in- the place he sannlvorihily he would have availed himself of the expedient h e had resorted to. When theißight Hon. Gentleman said that he had varied from the principles of Mr. Addington, that he had, violated the Sinking Fund, he was totally unfounded in such assertions. He would assure the Right Honourable Gentleman that when he stated that he had atied contrary to the pra&ices of Mr. Addington, and Mr. Pitt, he did not recoiled that he was in a situation in which they never Were, and this he would confidently main tain. ,Before he proceeded, he wished to make a few observations on what had fallen ; so far from thinking the Right Hon. Gentleman hostile to his measure, he did not blatne the challenge he had thrown out ; the situation. of the country had been ,adverted to; lie was certain it was not the-intention Qf his Hon. Friend (Mr. Huskisson) to create a gloom iu the mind of the' liouse and of the country, be was confident it was not, his view, but unfortunately his assertions bad that effed, and had produced in the public mind 'the idea, that from the state of our . Firlance, we were not able to carry on the war; however, it must be obvious, even from Are enunitTrition , of various difficulties, that such a circumstance was impossible. It had been stated .that the Excise duty was ovpressive to manufa6ture, but this was falsified by the state of trade, which on the . contrary exhibited a great increase and pro- • gress ; nothing thereiore.eould justify this observa tion, The Right Hon.. Gentleman opposite as sumed as a principle, that it is the object of Mini sters to . look, to the increase of the Consolidated Fund. In this he was not right. He begged the House to attend to the progress of Finance which he would now bring. before them ; and he trusted and anticipated that the difference between his situation and. that et Mr. Addington and Mr. Pitt; would ap pear manifest., In the year 1792, the per cents. were g 6 and a fratlion in the. next year, 1793, they came down to 77i; shortly afterthe war broke out they then were 75, and at the end of the year were 74. The ensuing year they were 73i; in 1795, they fell so low,as 65; they rose for a short time, but in the year 1797 they were 55, and in 1798, 451. When . Mr. Pitt, found this to be the state cif the Fund he was obliged to borrow at the rate of 100 per cent. EVen with this he found it impossible to proeeed as his means were so reduced. The year 1797 was the first of the progress of the Income Tax; from that time the price of Stocks in creased ; and in the year 1801 they were at 621. Having raised the Income Tax, Mr. Pitt charged on it the loan of the year. When Mr. Addington succeeded, he got fifty-seven millions on the In come Tax'. The manner he acted with respe& to . the 'War Taxes, was but following the ex ample and the pra&ices of Mr. Pitt. Mr. Ad dington in 1802, met the great debt of 57 millions ; he laid on new taxes, and in 1803 the 3 per cents. were'at 73 and a fraction. The war follow4d, in 1804 the 3 per cents. had fallen to 56 ; would then Mr. Addington . have done 'wisely if lie had riot adopted the principles of Mr. Pitt ? In 1804, 5, the Stocks were at 59, in 1806, at Go, in 1807, Go and a fra&ion, and that was the state in which they were found when the present Administration commenced ; in the course of three years they have increased to 701; yesterday he believed they were 72; yet he was supposed to aCI,on a contrary prin ciple to Mr. Pitt. - This statement must shew dis tinctly the difference of their situation. To the manner in which Lord Sidmouth met hiS difficulties he bore the highest testimony. It was said that he had departed from the line of cont h act which was. pursued by the Noble Lord who preceded him'; the proposition however was different, from 'the re solution of the Noble Lord which had been entered on the Journals. If he thought that the Consoli dated Fund was to be nourished in time Of. war, .4,e most have been absent from the House wheti the resolution , was passed. On the contrary, he went to the establishment of 1 . principle reatonably able fcir the service of future years ; such 'was the principle 'of the resolution of the • Noble Lord in 1807, which was, that there shoUld be laid before the House the net amount of the prodtice of-the taxes df the three preceding years ) and then tlise necessary for the three ensuing. If do increas.e.vhis found, it slionld be aPplicable to the burden of the . new loan. Did the Right Hon. Gentleman .411 hi• tam that the - Noble Lord did not %vislytheszrprus . 41 the Consolidated Fund to be touched,,wiren in resolution he approved - of doing so Wds anxi ous till he heard - how such extremes could be re' conciled ; and he was persuaded Parliament WdUld not refuse its sanction' to a measure, Which, 'while it viointed no principle, provided lit't the publia,. exigeni.e~y without any increase or taxatioii upon the people, Mr. 'TIERNEY replied. • Mr.:BA'iIIURST was disposed to vote for the till, The House then divided-4. _ • Ayes Noes xr7 Majority • - 7 --64 The'other Orders were disposed of, and at Half-, past Two o'Clock this ,Morning_ the House ad pump& *** Ili our Report of yesterday, the Division on Mr. Bas.- tard's )tion for referring to a Committee flie Innkeepers' • Petition• for an Increase of their Rates of Allowance did' itc4, appear. - -On dividing, the numbers were—Ayes, i9—Noes, 29 —Malt, ?City, to. A woman 'who lives in St. George's Fields was appreli: nded by Collingbourn, and the Beddl,e Castle :Baynard Ward, on a chaige of cruelty tw• wards h er daughter, a child of seven fears of age. The sots of Mrs. Brownrigg, of notorious memory. fade, o n compatistin with those exercised on the person i)f this unforttinate infant, who at present lies in Sir. Bartholomew's Hospital, in a very danger ous stmt.. The child was abmdoned on. Sunday .evening last; in Castle Baynard Ward, after having been criuelly beaten by its unnatural parent. To offence having been committed in the City, the prisonei IA as taken by Collingbourn before Mr. Aldermi;n Goodbehere, at Guildhall, when Mr tart,. a' Surgeon - belonging to St. Bartholomew's , and several respectable witnesses examined,„ Were whO described the shocking state in which tile infant: at at present lies. The prisoner was remanded for, future examination.. On Friday last, at the house of her Ladyship's mother, Mrs. Hey's, Upper SUnbury-Lodge, t h e Lady eit the' Right Hon. Lord Viscount Tumour, of a Son and Heir. Oh Wednesday, in Monument-yard, the wife of 'the Rev. Robert. Q.rosby, of a Daughter. Yesterday morning . , the Lady of Lieutenant -Colonel Win. tnue•Wrnard, of the Coldstream Regiment Of Foot Guards, of twins, • MARRI/D, On Ttiesday last, at Croydon, William Taylor, Esq. of Cheshunit, Herts, to Miss Nary Ann Westerman, of Croy-. don, Surirey, On Wednesday last, at St. Andrew's, Holborn, Mr. Henry Walker, of New O r m on d- street, son of the late Marshall of the King's Bench, to Miss Olivia Brooks, of Millman-street. Yestertlay, by special license, in St. Mary le. bonne Church, Baron 1)4: Roll, Colonel of a Swiss Regiment in His Majes= ty's . service, to Miss Pate, of Epsom, Surrey, daughter of the late %Valiant Pate,- Esq. of the same place: The sane day, at St. George's, Bloomsbury, the Rev. George Nowell Watkins, of Froyle ' Hants, to Mary, the youngest klau g h ter o f Thoma s Aston, Esq. of Bedford. place, Russel I luare. • - Dlh_D PRIC Y EITE _- Bank Stock, 263 262 Navy SNT Cent tot Irish 5 par Cent. 4 per Cent. Ssiiii 3 per Cent. Red. 70 # I per Cent. Cons. 71 7oi Bank L. Ann. 18 11.16ths i.ONDON : Printed by RI CHARD HARRIS, ot No. 4, Martlett..,co bow_stiect ; and Pubh,ned b) WI 1., LI M ARV] C; ERSC RI l'S, South . Nlalton. G r , ”'ve!:(y tqtl.l•, At !be $l./14.OFFICE, No. iii, Strand, where Advertisements, Orders for ti Pr.prr, Letters for the, Efi4or, &c, (pst-pqia.), 0 - vist be a.ddr.l...tisM, Ott &at iraay la3t, at his father's house ' kensworth. Halt, tints,, of a consumption, Mr. W . Howard, aged 26. On Sunday last, - Nlary, youngest daught,r of the late chard M apletoft, Esq. of Canterbury. On the 23d inst. Mrs. Heathfield, of Croydon, Surrey, sister of the late Rev. J. Heathfield, of Northaw, Herts: On Wednesday last, of a decline, in the 26th year of his age, Fitzowen George Skinner, EN. late Commander of His Majesty's sloop Trinculo. I• .s 1 GCA S 3RDAY. India Stock, 1896 India Bonds, rgs. zrs. pr. Excheq. Bills, 4s. 6s. pr. Omniurn, 1 Imperial 3 per Cent. Ditto Ann. Cons. for Opening, 71 ,1 A CHALLENGE. MESSRS. CURRIE and Co.. Sgrg eonc , l ate i n his Majesty's service, challenge the whole world to prove a single instance where their medicine and method of cure have tailed of the desired efrea. The pradlice 'of many years in this particular branch of their profession, has not given rise to one unsuccessful case. __ , . , . They continue to direct their studies to the t rea t ment and cure of venereal complaints, and that derangement of the sys. tem, which is the consequence of the pernicioUs and wasteful • effeds of a habit long and most unhappily pursued by the Youth of both sexes. In the one it .will be found to be the unfailing'source of barrenness; the other have its ravages fa. tally developed to them •hy a distressing state of debility which, i not timely remedied, terminates in impotence. These are its remote and ultimate effeels, while consump tion, loss of muscular power;ansl various nervous complaints, usually uharaderise the earlier stages of this solitary vice. Of persons languishing un.!er the disorders incident to such a habit, thtir treatment is simple, and has never proved unsuc cessful itt the course of a long, laborious, and much extended practice. In the most obstinate and complicated caseeof ve nereal infeetidn, suchas' obstructions in the urethra, spungy excrescenoes, hard tumors, call o us ulcers, eruptions, semi. nal weakness, gleets, as also STRICTURES, Whether recent or of long ,duration, and which hive baf fled the *ill of other Practitioners, are by their present int• proved plan of treatment, efiettually and permanently cured,- without the Patient suffering the excruciating pall and: alarming hemorrhage which frequently tot lows. the applica tion of the lunar caustic. In the course of twenty yearn extensive practice in this Metropolis, numerous cases of Strielures , have been and are daily under their care, the total. eradication of which • is effkeled by a safe, certain, and expe ditious Made of practice, superior to any other yet adopted: ' The weakness, relaxation, and debility proceeding from thia , complaint:are speedily removed, and the Patient restored to , sound and vigorous health. ,But where the debility has for' years existed, a proper perseverance in their restorative re medies, after the Stricture has been destroye..l, is indispensa.- bly requisite to revive the Slumbering sparks of life mato , reanimate the constitution. Several Noblemen and Gentlemen of the first respethhi.. lity, have be.o under the care of Me ss r s .' Currie and Co. fOr the removal ot complaints of the lifethri, 'Strictures, kc. and having reg - eived a - radical, and permanent Cure, request that references tnay be given to- them, as satisfactory evi dences of the decisive superiority of Messrs. Currie and Co's. .plan of - treatment: NLiity ot these Gentlemen t ave had striaures trout to to 29 years, and - had been under the care of Messrs.'Hoine, Heaviside, and other urgeons - -ot equal eini— pence, who attempted the cure bylthe ot the Lu.- nar Caustic, without success.' Messrs. ettrite and CO. ;nay be consulted by either sex with the ghs.itest delicacy, semcy, and honour, at their• house; No. 107, liattim.garden. Patients in the Country are r2rprested to state the plutien... tars ot their case„ age, and general habit of living, 64c. 64e. inclosing a reinit4ince ter advice arid medicines, when the same will be givcii or sent to an) 'Litt of the kingdom. Ta en%nre than secrecy so essential to their undertaking, the postage ot letters rlmay be ad4e , l to tik - a,:c , :unt tut tnedt‘iues. gth [Ube, tiatien-gdideir. i ~E~ o~ 9, ~ 7 1 1 4,,0t 1 75( N o No til t