The Sun. — London, England, 1836-01-05 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. We are not aware that Sir Robert Peel was ever I guilty of the sin of undervaluing himself, and indeed the Right Hon. Baronet is supposed, from the very commeneznient of his political carter, to have had an especial eye to the station he now occupies—the ae knowle4cl chief of the Tories. That ambition is his besetting sin, was, we think, sufficiently proved in the dis creditable intrigues, in which he was the prime mover, to prevent Mr. Canning from forming a Ministry. In the Times of yesterday, the Right Hon. Baronet re ceives credit for fully as much virtue as he really pos sesses. To this we have, however, no great objection ; but our Contemporary cannot afford to bestow praise without distributing an equivalent amount of abuse ; and in this case it appears that, in order to deck out Sir Robert, the Tory Aristocrats are all treated worse than dogs. "It is a matter of notoriety (exclaims our Contemporary in its irrepressible eagerness to idolize Sir Robert), it is a matter of notoriety that Sir R. Peel has never been very cordially supported by some of the more lordly Aristocrats of England, be cause lie is a novas ho»zo—b:cause he has sprung more directly from the people than themselves, as immediately, for instance, as the greater number of their ances tors did in the last or the preceding century ; and that the sting which vexes them is the more severe by reason of the Right Hon. Baronet's possessing, in an eminent degree, the great feature of that rival Aristo cracy, of which the thing called birth ' is naturally, but meanly and absurdly jealous, viz.—the Aristocracy of wealth." 'We are sorry to learn from so compe tent an authority that the Tory aristocrats arc equally proud and mean—proud of their birth, and, without possessing talents themselves, meanly jealous of the man whose talents are indispensable to their existence as a party. But admitting this character to be 'de served, there may be as much pride in affected humi lity as in vain display ; and many discerning persons have thought that the ostentatious manner in which Sir Robert Peel has occasionally referred, at public meet ings, to the sources of the fortunes of his family par took fully as much of pride as of humility. Sir Robert Peel appears to he perfectly well aware of the advan tages of being rich ; and as nature does not seem to have intended him for a Merry Andrew, any more than a bear for dancing, the Tory Aristocrats, who, in their way, have the taste of Kings (Burke says that all Kings are fond of buffoons and low company), may almost be pardoned for indemnifying themselves for their subjection to their stately chief, by laughing, behind his back, at what they deem his low-bred airs. A pretty escape, however, we have had, according to the Times. We are gravely told that Sir Robert con centrates in himself all the talents and all the virtues of the Tories. " The Conservatives, young and old," says our Contemporary, " who sit in Parliament, are bound to consider that Sir Robert Peel can do extremely well, without their assistance ; but that without him they can do nothing for themselves." This, with all due submission, seems to be elevating Sir Robert be yond his deserts. Sir Robert can visit Rome and Naples, and buy pictures without the Tories ; but he cannot be a political chief. We had imagined that the soldiers were as necessary to the general, as the general to the soldiers. Sir Robert cannot hope even to beat the Reformers without the aid of the Tory Members. " A sad con temptible set they no doubt are ; but Sir Robert must take them as they are. We fear that the Times, in administering adulation to Sir Robert, has not re flected that the Right Hon. Baronet would dread no thing so much as to be taken at its word. He is not yet prepared for a retreat from public life. The To ries, therefore, worthless as they may be, are still ne cessary to him ; and we cannot help thinking there is in this attempt to elevate Sir Robert at their expense, a design to break up a party which seems now farther from pryer than ever, and which, therefore, our Con temporary must wish to be rid of with as little delay as possible.—Morning Chronicle. Some of the Radical prints are as " elevated" with their corporate returns as an Irishman whose heels have been tripped up by the last half gill of whisky. We are assured by one of them that " whenever a general election comes" there will be a demonstration of political feeling similar to that of the last ten days. There is no doubt of it. We expect no other. We as Conservative Reformers—Sir R. Peel, we are sure, as a Conservative and Reformer—desires no other de monstration of public feeling than one similar to that of the last six months—the last ten days being specially therein comprehended. But if our worthy Radicals in and out of office are so marvellously satisfied with the promise of the last ten days, and so convinced of its fulfilment to such an extent and of such a nature as they have been anticipating " whenever a general elec tion comes," why don't they hasten the advent of this their Whig-Radical Messiah—why don't they make the general election come? We shall rejoice to see that hour—much will every honest man who knows this country exult in the announcement of a new election, should his Majesty be pleased to afford his loyal subjects so full and fitting an opportunity to " demonstrate" their matured opinions with regard to this Repeal-O'Connell-Popery -anti-Saxon-anti- Monarchy Administration. But no such happy con summation is yet to be accomplished. The O'Connell- Melbournes will not dare dissolve. Desperate as is their game with the present House of Commons of 315 or 320 Conservatives, they will not throw away their last and only chance, by adding to them a rein forcement of 50 or 60 other Conservative gentlemen. Blind and stupid though they arc, the tag-rag Minis ters will not designedly poke out the precipice by a fall from which they must be annihilated. Lord John Russell has nosy ostensibly put forth his Circular sum moning all that heterogeneous body on whose unani mous adhesion bangs his Being as a Minister, to meet his Lordship and his colleagues on the 4th of February, when " business of great importance will be imme diately brought forward." Here, alas ! is no symp tom of that general election to which sanguine and prophetic Radicals look forward with hope so con solatory to the afflicted. Lord John Russell states, or rather threatens, that business of " great impor tance" will be at once brought forward. This is altogether inevitable. Where the existence of a Mi nistry is identified with the ruin of the Church, the prostration of the Crown, and the dissolution of the Empire, it needs no assurance from the leader of the House of Commons to persuade us, that if the ensuing King's speech be any index whatever of the acts which are meditated by his Ministers, it must be not only the most important, but the most awful and appalling, that ever was delivered in the name of a British Sovereign. It is vain to guess what these unfortunate men might wish—nay, purpose—were they independent. They are not independent. Their position binds them to the evil principle on which their Government was founded. It enslaves them to the demon who presided over their Ministerial birth. They are in the helpless condition 'of the usurper who stabbed the gracious Duncan while he slept, and feel, as he did, that perti nacity in crime is their sole defence against an entire ,‘ Things bad began, strengthen themselves by ill." That is their text. What the fiend inspired, the fiend must consummate. Lord Melbourne and Lord John Russell have pledged themselves to their party, for the success of that cause which is common to them with O'Connell : their sense of honour (!) will not suffer them to shrink from the subversion of the Mo narchy, though it includes their own infallible per dition. To Lord John Russell's circular we wish all manner of success ; but it is coupled with one pro vision—viz., that our circular, addressed on Saturday and yesterday to the Conservative majority of English Rep resenta ti ve s, and to their few faithful allies from the north and west, shall also work its own just im pression. It is our anxious wish that the array on both sides may be full, and that the overthrow of the Revolutionist s may be total. The Radicals have been talking their usual amount and usual kind of nonsense on this occasion, affecting to consider our blunt appeals to the firmness, activity, integrity, and manhood, of the Conservatives, in :urging them to show front every day to the enemies of themselves and their country, as a symptom of despondency on our part. Poor blockheads of Radicals, it may be cruel to undeceive you, but we cannot help it. When a soldier whets his blade and - buckles on his armour more carefully than usual, it is not often a sign that he means to balk the combat. , When troops are publicly reminded of their relaxation 1 of discipline, and orders are issued for enforcing the rules of the service with more strictness than ever, it is no proof that the general means to disband them, or to turn his back upon the enemy. So when we have within these few days volunteered our remon stances to those of the Conservatives who had left their racks in the course of last session, thus crippling the movements of the Constitutional host, and impairing the moral influence of the cause for which their skilful and resolute leaders were contending, our obvious hope and design have been merely to insure some harder work for the adversary than he experienced in the year gone by. In the execution of this task we have employed rough language; we have read in rude words, a harsh but wholesome lesson ; we have told many gentlemen truths which per haps their self-complacency, perhaps their inward consciousness, rendered unpalatable to them—but it was for their own sakes we did so. For ourselves, what delight can we take in rendering ourselves trou blesome to a number of our constant and most indul gent readers ? What pleasure can it yield us, to be set down by them for meddling and ill-mannered, be cause ❑ninvited monitors ? It is to nave the country we ' have done so, for its salvation is in no hands but theirs— in no hands but those of the Conservative body—who, if they will but screw their courage to the sticking place, cannot fail to protect the kingdom—and to protect it by receiving from the Sovereign and the nation, ere long, authority to govern it in the name and on behalf of both. With such great and patriotic objects in view, we will venture to give temporary annoyance to our friends, while we regard as mere idle wind the noisiest execrations of our and our country's enemies. To be sure, there is one libeller by profession, who has in a recent attack upon Sir Francis Burdett launched an other slop-bucket at this journal. He—O'Connell— after sundry " rhetorical artifices " of the class called lying, charges us with a prodigious multitude of enor mities " for the filthy lucre of gain." If the fellow means that we are bribed, or ever have been bribed, in any form, or to the value of one of those in numerable farthings which he extorts every year from his brethren, the sturdy beggarmen of Ireland, by means scarcely differing, if at all, from highway robbery,—if he means to insinuate that any human being, connected with the Times, has ever in a single instance solicited or accepted favour to the amount of one fraction of a farthing, as the price or in consideration of any part ever taken by this paper on political questions, let him come forward himself, or bring forward any earthly evidence, or even any shadow of plausibility, in support of such a despicable falsehood,—and here we stand to give him the lie in his throat. We found the Whigs support ing our own views of national policy, and we helped them—God knows they needed help. We found them afterwards chained to the car of this wretched adven turer—this O'Connell—far overleaping all our views of what the national welfare required or admitted of, and driving our institutions headlong into the gulf which his ravenous selfishneSs, and that of his priestly coadjutors, had prepared fot them, and we abandoned the Whigs. The Conservatives are now what once the Whigs professed to be, and as honest men we give them our support. We have never varied from a single principle which we ever avowed. The Whigs have become revolutionary Destructives, and we abjure them. O'Connell has been their min.—Times. It will be seen by the circular letter of Lord John Russell, dated on the day of the great municipal triumph, the last day of the year, and addressed to the Reform Members of the House of Commons, (which appeared in yesterday's paper,) that his Lordship has intimated to them how desirable it is that they should attend in all their numerical strength on the first day of the Session. We are glad to perceive this intima tion on several accounts. It demonstrates the unre laxing vigilance of the Ministry ; and their determina tion to lose no time in the great career of popular Reform, which they have so well commenced, is re corded by the announcement « that business of great importance will be immediately brought forward." That is one subject of congratulation. Another is, that Ministers show no white feather ; they are not in timidated by the Tory boast of their incompetency to meet their braggart enemy. They manifest the wisdom of borrowing the best page from the enemy's book— fas est ab hosie doceri. They beat the reveille in peremptory reply, to the enemy's drum : " Sound but a drum, and swift another shall Arouse the welkin with an answering peal, And mock the loud mouthed thunder." The reader will perceive our reference in the above passage is to the extraordinary call made in a Conser vative Paper, on Saturday, on the supporters of Sir Robert Peel—" to assemble in all their strength on the first day of the Session." Certainly the article in question was a most extraordinary one, both on account of what it urged, and what it confessed. The speech of the Emperor Nicholas at Warsaw has been charac terized as an extraordinary example of Absolutist frankness. But the frankness of the article in question, to use a phrase of the Conservative print in which it appeared, " beats Banagher hollow." The Conser vative Members are " invited," something after the fashion of the French police, to attend ; but under terror of a whip of larger dimensions than ever Con servative whipper-in before brandished. The writer, in soliciting their attendance, calls them " culprits," "recreants," and" criminals." They are said to have, " during three-fourths of the last Session, effemi nately and shamefully betrayed their trust ;" and it is added, " that they are too much absorbed in frivo lous and criminal indulgences to afford their country a moderate portion of that time and industry of which she is entitled to the whole." The Conservative mi nority who are plaCed in the above state of uncompli mentary contrast to their leader, and who are treated in this unceremonious manner in the leading article of a journal which they consider as their chief supporter, may address the writer in the words of Falstqlf— " Call you this backing your friends ? A plague on such backing, say we." Perhaps some of them may think they " smell a rat"—one of those rats who are generally charged with the ungrateful sagacity of quit ting a sinking vessel. If it be " backing," it bears a strong resemblance to " backing out." But whe ther this be so or not—we come to the main point— we come to the two notices from the two opposing head-quarters—the one proceeding officially from Lord John Russell—the other coming less offi cially, but very palpably, from the Conservative head quarters at the Carlton Club. We thank the latter for their notice that the Conservative troops are expected to be in order for battle, " not merely on the first day, or during the first week of" the Session, but throughout it, from February to the end of July.' We trust the friends of Government, and of the peo ple, will avail themselves of the hint, and confront the enemy with a phalanx and with a determination which shall " frustrate their politics" and " confound' their knavish tricks." It is indeed a most important crisis for the people ; but no gloomy clouds " heavily bring on the day" of contest. On the contrary, it is harbingered by the most auspicious omens of a bright day for liberty, and for political improvement. " Busi ness of great importance," as Lord John Russell inti mates, will indeed be brought forward. A slight glance at the measures with which the Session must begin will demonstrate how important that business is. The Irish Church Reform Bill—the Registration Bill—the Dissenters' Marriage Bill—and the Jewish Emanci pation Bill—are among _ a few of those important measures. The notice of them suggests, at the same time, the revolting image of the machinery which will be put in motion to resist them in the Commons, and of the stumbling-block which will inevitably and ultimately be thrown in their way before they reach the throne, by the House of hereditary bigotry and exclusive prejudice. But let the :Ministers fear no thing, and, in the words of Bayard, "do their duty, whatever may be the result." Doing that, they are invulnerable, unassailable, ,unremovable. Strong in the armour of right s and in the s hi e ld and sword with which the Municipal triumph has just invested them, they may, as we have said before, defy their enemies. A dissolution, if compelled, would all but extinguish a party, the leaders of which, as we have seen, confess it to be unfit even for common legislative functions, and, therefore, certainly unfit for the possession of power. They are pronounced to be "incompetent," " profligate," " frivolous," and " criminal," even by their own friends. Qui pravaricatores, igitur, si yui. dens vos consides?—qui balverones? qui latrones ?- Morning Advertiser. The Ministerial Journals prsist in claiming the re sult of the Municipal elections as a political triumph in the true Whig sense of the word—that is, a triumph over the uncertainty of place and emolument. But boasting is not a very sober companion for truth, nor a very graceful accompaniment to victory, and when it ••,: carried to such extravagant lengths as in the case of the Municipal Elections, one cannot help suspecting that there is some uneasiness, some fear, at the bottom of all this swagger. We believe, and %NC are far from being singular in the belief, that the near approach of the Session, when the strength of parties will be put to the test, when the dependency of Ministers upon the voice or finger of a man whom they hate will be again palpably exhibited, that these, and other consi derations of the same kind, have suggested to them the policy of making the most of every advantage. But there is such a thing as making too much of an advan tage, and the stretching and straining of the Municipal doings of the day into a, conclusive proof that the people of England are with the Ministers, is one of the instances to which we should point, in order to establish that principle. It is all very well to put a good face upon matters when they are coming to a crisis, but a little More frugality in the article of bom bast would be an improvement in the tactics of the Government. The old Corporations were, no doubt, many of them corrupt, but some proceedings have come to light, which show that the new ones are not altogether immaculate. It was some consolation to think that in the old Corporations corruption was the growth of time, the infirmity of old age and decay ; but now, at the very birth of the new Corporations, and while the joy bells are ringing for the nativity, it seems that in some instances corruption has been rocked in the same cradle. This is no very gratifyinc , discovery for those who looked forward to the purifi cation of the old system, however it may enchant ano ther class of politicians—those who have no objection to shake hands with bribery when it comes upon a visit to their own party, or makes a movement in the direc tion of their own pockets. Let them not, however, be too secure upon this head. The success of the elec tions, (in which they calculate with so much confidence, as the prelude to other elections of a more important character, has been a gain in the majority of cases, not to the Whigs, but to the Radicals--not to the Govern ment, but to those who bully the Government, and who may, and that too without subjecting themselves to the charge of treason cr disaffection, contrive to bring the present Government into contempt. But the speedy commencement of the Parliamentary campaign will put all these fine boastings and triumphings to the test. We remember what a figure the Ministry made upon many occasions in the course of last Session, and we do not think it likely that the increasing strength of the party which dragged them so often through the dirt is a circumstance so favourable to their re-appearance, as they would fain persuade the world to believe by the pains which they are taking to give it publicity.— Morning Herald. A morning paper, which affects to have adopted Conservative principles, has indulged its readers during the last two or three days with certain articles, the motives of which are wholly unintelligible to us ; but the tendency, or rather we ought to say the necessary effect, of which, if they should produce any, is de plorably evident, viz., to inspire a general feeling of contempt and indignation among the people of Eng land towards the great body of Conservative Members of the House of Commons, and to alienate the most important and influential members of the party from each other. The pretence under which these absurd and mischievous productions are ushered into light is, that a large proportion of the higher classes of Conservatives are so indifferent to the safety and honour of their country, so regardless of what is required of them if they wish to preserve their own rank, station, and influence in society, so disloyal to the Throne, so cool and languid in their attach ment to the Church, so neutral, in one word, as to the ascendancy of Conservative or destructive principles in the foreign and domestic policy of Great Britain, that if not dragooned by the press all these important considerations will be insufficient to compel them to a diligent and zealous attendance in their places in Par liament. We do not know how our new ally can re concile these surviving notions of the character of the Conservative party with his recent accession to their cause—to a cause which, if there be any portion of truth or justice in his accusations, is already lost. For ourselves we will frankly say that if we entertained such opinions of the great bulk of the Conservative party as our contemporary ostentatiously proclaims, we should at once withdraw from the banners under which such must be our fellow-soldiers, and throw down our arms in disgust and despair. But in the sweeping vi tuperation of our Contemporary, directed against the Conservative Members of the House of Commons as a body, we venture to assert that there is neither truth, nor justice, nor reason, nor decency. It is not true that the " prominent leaders and champions of the Conservative interest were, during the last session of Parliament, left shamefully in the lurch by their pro fessed supporters." It is not true " that while Minis ter, and afterwards while head head of the Opposition, Sir Robert Peel was scandalously treated by the minions of the titled and landed Aristocracy," and the expression is as indecent as the assertion is false. It is not true that the Conservative corps now in Parlia ment are skulkers and shirkers, or that they have shown themselves to be " fine Gentlemen" in any sense of the word that is incompatible with the disposition, and the ability, faithfully and zealously to discharge their duty to their country, to their party, to their matchless leader,' and to their noble cause. All that 'is true in the furious tirades of our Contemporary, and it is a truth which we trust may be adequately deplored without employing the language of outrage and con tumely, is that upon a few occasions (they were very few) towards the conclusion of a harrassing and pro tracted Session, the attendance of Conservative Mem bers in the House of Commons was less numerous than unquestionably it ought ever to have been. But it should be recollected that the relative strength of the Conservative party, and of the confederated parties op posed to them, having been fairly tried in the various divisions which preceded and produced the resigna tion of Sir Robert Peel and his colleagues, and a clear though small majority of the House having de clared in favour of the latter, there no longer existed such motives to incessant attendance, as could be ex pected to exercise an unabated influence upon the conduct of every individual of a numerous body. It was not the object of the Conservative party io the House of Commons, whether followers or leaders, nor did either act as if it were, to watch night after night, for an opportunity to snatch by surprise from their opponents a momentary and unavailing triumph. Such opportunities might p ro b a bl y have occurred, had the full muster of Conservatives been present every night. And to what effect ? Simply to produce an assemblage more full than usual of the Russell-O'Con nell majority on the following evening, to rescind the vote in which the Conservative Opposition had achieved a transitory victory. There is not a man in Great Britain who sincerely believes that any dis play of numbers, short of that which would have sufficed to convert the measures of Sir Rober' Peel into laws, could have added anything to the effect of his many splendid orations. The state of affairs since that period has, happily for the country, undergone a material change, and it is to those magnificen ora tions of Sir Robert Peel, more than to any other cause, that this beneficial change is to be ascribed. Whether the numerical superiority belongs to the Conservative or the Destructive party in the House of Commons is once more doubtful. The Conservatives have now to fight a battle which is no longer hope less ; and they will fight it h such a manner as equally to put to shame the insidious calumnies of pretended friends, and the exultation of avowed enemies, to which these calumnies have supplied abundant occa sion and pretext. We pass by, as utterly unworthy of notice, the senseless imputation upon those who are called " the more lordly aristocrats of England," that they have withheld their support from Sir R. Pe e l be cause he cannot claim a noble descent. "rile heredi tary Peers of Great Britain are not generally idiots, whatever ideas it may suit the disposition or the policy of our Conservative contemporary to communicat e re spectin& them to his pot-house readers or at what- ever sacrifice of truth, decency, and consistency he into his lab our f or t h e privilege of being re-admitted his ancient alliance with Mr. O'Connell.—Morning Post. THE SUN, LONDON, 'TUESDAY, JANUARY 5, 1836 POLICE INTELLIGENCE. GUILDHALL. Yesterday Jaws Parsons, a newsvender, was brought before Mr. Alderma❑ KELLY, charged with selling un stamped newspapers, entitled the Sunday Times, Weekly Dispatch, and Police Gazette. The complaint was made by Samuel Morrison, an officer appointed by the Commissioners of Stamps, who said he saw the prisoner go up Ludgate-hill with a bundle of papers, co vered up with a wrapper, under his arm. Suspecting they were unstamped papers, he followed him up Bell Sauvage yard and asked if he had a paper to sell. Prisoner said yes, and handing him a Police Gazette, he asked him if that would do ? Witness said," Yes, it will do, and now I will have you." The prisoner went quietly to the Compter, and had been locked up since Saturday evening. The Clerk said he understood the witness that the pri soner did not offer the paper for sale till he asked him for one. Witness replied—" Precisely so." Mr. Alderman KELLY, after looking over one of the pa pers, asked if the witness supposed the public would be satis fied to have one of those publications instead of the stamped papers of the same name, the contents of the one being so inferior to the other ? Morrison said there was no doubt about that, for immense numbers of the unstamped papers were sold. Mr. Alderman KELLY said, if so, it were an endless task to go about the streets picking up the poor men who ven tured to sell them. He read the imprint of one of the papers, and asked why the witness did not go there. Here it was openly stated that the trade were supplied at that shop. Morrison said he could only take persons selling in the streets. Mr. Alderman KELLY replied lie might prosecute per sons for selling in shops, and it would be more charitable, and go more directly to remedy the evil, to prosecute the publishers and the printers. He would answer for it, that if he were to slip on an old great-coat, and take a bag under his arm, he might buy 100 of each at the several original publishers, and obtain ground for so many convic tions. Why were not the publishers sued before the ma gistrates for penalties, and steadily followed up ? Anybody could get served in the way he had mentioned. Morrison merely replied he had no orders to do so. It was explained to the Magistrate that no proceeding could be had against the original publishers but by the ex press direction of the Stamp Commissioners, and they would not give such direction. Parsons, who, when among his fraternity, is an eloquent sort of man, and a bit of a wag, seemed struck aghast at the possibility of being shut up in a gaol till the beginning of the dog-days. ' He pleaded that he was merely carrying tho papers for another person, that it was his first offence, and that he would never do the like again. The officer said he was not known to have been in cus tody before. Sir. Alderman KELLY said the prisoner should have the benefit of that, and discharged him, cautioning him to be ware of offending again. Q UEEN-SQUARE. Yesterday the Magistrates, Messrs. BURRELL and W HITE, were oceupied a considerable portion of the day in adjudicating upon cases relative to the unstamped newspa per trade. A middle-aged man, of shabby genteel appearance, who gave his name Edward Mesnard, was charged with having in his possession, in the Waterloo-road, o n S a t ur d ay even ing, a quantity of the Weekly Times, Weekly Dispatch, and Cleave's Weekly Police Gazette. Edward James Handley deposed that at 10 o'clock on Saturday night he was on duty in the Waterloo-road with Smith and Hall, officers of this establishment, looking out for the unstamped vendors. Witness observed the prisoner come out of the shop of a man named Reeve, a notorious vendor of unstamped publications, with a quantity of papers under his arm, and suspecting that they were unstamped, he followed him ; a man and woman went up and asked him for an unstamped newspaper, whereupon the prisoner took the paper produced from those under his arm, and tendered it to him ; the man inquired whether it was the Weekly Times ? he was answered in the affirmative, and was about to pay 2d. for it, when the prisoner observed witness watching him, and hesitated upon taking the mo ney, upon which witness immediately went up and seized the paper which had been purchased, and took the prisoner into custody. A. number of unstamped newspapers were in his possession, all of which were retained by Susi& and Hall. The officers added that their instructions from the Stamp offiee were not to press for a conviction upon a first offence ; but the papers were to be confiscated. Mr. BURRELL—Is this the first offence of the prisoner? Smith—l believe it is. He has not been here before. Mr. BURRELL ordered the prisoner to be discharged upon his promise not to offend again in a similar manner. The next case was that of a lad named Henry Roberts, the son of a newsman residing in Symmon's-street, Chelsea, who was charged by the same officers with" having two copies of the Weekly Times in his possession. The Magistrates severely reprimanded the father, who was the principal in the case, and cautioned the boy not to offend for the future. MAR YLEB ONE. CHARGE OF MURDER.—Yesterday Jame: Quin, a la bouring man, was placed at the bar before Mr. RANYLIN SON, charged on suspicion of causing the death of Andrew Ryan. Mary Ryan, wife of the deceased, and her husband, lodged at No. 3, Baker's-court, East-street, and the prisoner resided in the same house. On Sunday morning, about eleven o'clock, she returned home with her little dog, and entered the front parlour occupied by the landlady, and at the door of the room stood the prisoner, who lifted his foot and gave the dog a desperate kick. Witness asked him his reason for so doing, adding, that if he had any spite he might ill-use her—not the dog. He then abused her, and some words ensued between them, which finished by his shut ting the door in her face. She then went up to her own room and told the deceased what had occurred, when he said ho " believed they would hang him and the dog too, if they could." Nothing more passed on the subject, and they sat down to breakfast, in the midst of which the deceased got up and went down stairs, and shortly after hearing a scuffle, she followed, and in the passage saw the prisoner and the deceased fighting. She tried to part them, but was unable, and immediately after the deceased went out into the court, exclaiming, " That's not fair—that's not fair." The prisoner went out after him with a tea-cup in his hand, on seeing which deceased said, " That's no weapon, use your arms ;" and witness then returned up stairs, and saw no more. The deceased, soon afterwards came up stairs, and, seating himself in a chair, leant back and closed his eyes. She asked him what was the matter, but he made no answer. She then laid him on the ground and sent for a surgeon; before whose arrival her husband was a corpse. Elizabeth Balby, who said that her husband was a ser vant at the residence of the Marquis of Conyngham, lodged in the next room to the one occupied by the deceased's wife. On Sunday morning she heard deceased say that he would kick the very liver out of any man that would kick his dog. Shortly after she heard a disturbance, and on going into the passage saw the deceased knock the prisoner down, and then drag him by the hair of his head to the street door. The blood was then flowing copiously from the mouth and nose of the prisoner. Witness tried to separate them, when they both went into the court, but no blows took place. They then returned into the house, when the prisoner went into his room (the back parlour), and, taking up the fire tongs, swore he - would have his revenge, and aim a blow with them at the deceased, but missed him. The deceased then - went to his own room, and witness believed that as be was afflicted with an impediment in his speech, he was not able to give vent to his feelings, and worked himself up to such a pitch, that he was actually choked with passion. Witness did not see any cup in the hands of the prisoner, neither did she see him strike the deceased once. The prisoner was remanded till the result of the Coro ner's inquest was known. UNION-HALL. Yesterday, Win. Predhani, a respectable looking young man, brought up to the medical profession, was brought before Mr. TRAILL, charged with obtaining money under false pretences from Mr. Edwin Bartlett, a surgeon, of Bir mingham. The complainant stated that the prisoner , formerly lived with him in the capacity of assistant, and that he left him between six and seven years ago, since which period he (the prisoner) had been abroad. On the preceding morning. about nine o'clock, the complainant received a letter, ad dressed to him at his residence in Birmingham, of which the following is a copy, and which will show the ingenuity de vised by the prisoner to succeed in his attempt to defraud the complainant : " Weymouth Arms Hotel, Weymouth-street, New Kent-road. " My dear Mr. Bartlett—Business of a very private nature called me to London a day or two ago, and last night, on re turning to my hotel, I was knocked down and robbed by a party of ruffians. You will regret to hear that the radius and ulna of the right arm were fractured in the affray. Circum stances of a peculiarly delicate nature rendered it necessary for me not to acquaint my family in Liverpool that I was coming to town. I also now request that you will not com municate to any one in Birmingham that I am here, or that I have written to you. You must be good enough to answer me by return of post, and inclose me a 101. note, which I will re turn to you on my reaching home, together with an explana tion of the apparent mystery. South, of St. Thomas's Hos- , pital, reduced the fractures, and I am now tolerably east. I must again impress on you the necessity which exists of your not acquainting my fam►ly with what has transpired, and as a friend and a gentleman I confklently rely upon you. " Believe me, my dear Bartlett, " Yours, very truly, " SAMUEL MALINS, per HENRY PORTER. " The master of the hotel is my scribe, owing to the inju ries of the right arm. Address for me at the Weymouth Arms Hotel." The complainant proceeded to describe that Dr. Malins, from whom the above letter purported to have been written, was his most. intimate friend, and resided at Liverpool. The moment fie (complainant) read the letter it struck him that it was in the prisoner's hand-writing, although he had not seen that person since he had left him, and that it was con trived for the purpose of fraud. Complainant, therefore, with a view to ascertain the fact, sat down and wrote one in reply, in which he enclosed a 5/. note, having previously endorsed the same, and transmitted it by post addressed according to the wish expressed in the letter above quoted. The same night he (complainant) left Birmingham by the mail which conveyed his letter containing the remittance, and at the time the postman was deiivering his letters in Weymouth-street the following morning he made a point of being close at l his heels, accompanied by a policeman, in order to give the writer of the fictitious epistle into custody, if lie made his appearance to receive it. Subsequently to the delivery at the Weymouth Arms complainant went to that house, and having inquired if Dr. Malins was staying there, and being answered in the affirmative, expressed a wish to see him upon urgent business. The landlord of the house went up stairs, and presently afterwards the prisoner came down, and, upon seeing the complainant, after having recovered from his surprise, requested to have an interview in a private room, to explain matters. This, however, was not acceded to by Mr. Bartlett, who gave the prisoner into custody, and, on the policeman examining him, the letter, inclosing the .5/. note from the complainant, was found in his possession. It appeared that the prisoner had been "living at the Weymouth Arms, a small public-house resorted to by people of poor condition, and that -since his residence there he always passed by the name of Dr. Malins, and had let ters addressed to him under that signature.—Fully com mitted for trial. DUBLIN POLICE. COLLEGE-STREET OFFICEr Saturday a Mr. Macdonogh applied to the magistrates of this office on the part of a Mrs. M'Cue, to have informa tions taken against a man named Dillon, who was also in attendance. Mrs. M'Cue is the mother of twenty-five children, eleven of whom are living, and who is a grand mother eleven years, quarrelled with her husband a few evenings before Christmas. In consequence of the alterca tion which took place, Mrs. M'Cue went to visit a friend, where; to drown sorrow, she took rather an immoderate quantity of punch. Returning home she met Dillon, whom she had previously known, and related to him the whole occurrence. Dillon immediately said, the only way to be avenged of her husband was to go with him to Cullen's wood and get married. The unfortunate woman consented to go for the sole purpose of annoying her husband, and actually got married. Fortunately, however, for the honour of her children, as well as for her own, the effects caused by having taken too much drink were gone, and reason having returned, she saw the dreadful position she had placed herself in, particularly as Dillon insisted she should go with him to his house and live with him as his wife. She would not consent to this, however, and suc ceeded in escaping from him, and returned to her husband and children. Of course she did not tell what occurred since she left the house, nor did she imagine anything more would be made of it. Her husband and she became re conciled that night, and so apparently ended the matter. Dillon, however, was not to be done out of his new wife so easily, and, accordingly like a second Paris, he matured his plans for carrying away Mrs. M'Cue from her husband. He is generally known by the appellation of " stag bail." ( He has succeeded in putting his horns in this case certainly). On Christmas day he procured about twenty ruffians, and, having learned that Mr. and Mrs. M'Cue, with some of their children, and a young lady, a Mrs. Smith, who was on a visit with them, were gone out to jaunt on their own private car, Dillon, accompanied by those ruffians, pursued and overtook them on Carlisle-bridge, where they seized the horse, assaulted Mr. M'Cue in the most savage manner, threw Mrs. Smith and the children off the car, and Dillon, jumping into the seat, drove off as quickly as he could, while two others supported Mrs. M'Cue (who had fainted) until they arrived at Dillon's residence in Skinner's-alley. He then brought her into his lodgings, and, as a preventive against her escaping, deprived her of her wearing apparel. The wretched woman, who was enciente of her twenty-fifth child, gave birth to an infant (in consequence of the fright she had received) shortly after going into Dillon's lodgings. Mr. M'Cue, accompanied by Mrs. Smith, having recovered themselves from the effects of the treatment they received on Carlisle-bridge, followed the car to Dillon's lodgings, who no sooner perc e i ve d th em th an h e l a id h old of a hatchet, and threatened, if they entered, to murder them. Through the interference of the police, however, Mrs. M'Cue was got out of the place, and conveyed to her lodgings in a dangerous state indeed. Mrs. M'Cue, on being sworn, stated that Mr. Macdo nogh did not tell half the cruelties which were inflicted on her. She did not recollect whether the marriage ceremony was performed or not, as she was nearly insensible at the time. A few days after it had occurred Mr. Cherry, a friend of witness's, told her that he (Dillon) was determined to take her at all hazards, and drag her through the city, in order to expose and destroy her character. Witness, on hearing this, went and spoke to him, represented to him her being the mother of a heavy family, and what would become of them if he exposed her ; to which he re plied, 6. Come live with me, and take all the money you can from Mr. M'Cue." Dillon, in his defence, said that Mrs. M'Cue was not lawfully married to her husband ; that she had frequently cohabited with himself, and, continued he, with a kind of bellow, she is my wife, and here's my certificate ; on the night in question she met me, when we went into a house in Church-lane, and had some spirits ; it was then about twelve o'clock ; we had not been long together when she asked me, would I marry her ; and on my replying that it would be better to wait until I'd be able to provide for my child, she said, " 0, you're a coward, come down to Ellen Young's, and I'll get some money from her ; we can then go out to Cullen's wood and get married ;" as I am a sin ner that's the truth, your Worship ; and she's no more Mrs. M'Cue than one of your Worships. The Magistrates directed informations to be taken against him, when he was committed to Newgate. FIRES. On Saturday evening, between seven and eight o'clock, a fire broke out in a lodging house kept by a person named Allen, No. 45, Wentworth -street, Whitechapel. After the fire was discovered, it was ascertained that a poor old woman, named Dickson, who has been bed-ridden for some years, was in bed when the flames first broke out, and a man, named Thomas Moore, residing next door, in the most heroic manner rushed through the flames at the abso lute risk of his own life, and carried the poor woman down stairs in his arms. In accomplishing this, Moore himself sustained considerable injuries, his eyebrows were singed off, his hair in flames, when he had reached the street, and his hands so dreadfully burned that it will be some time before he can leave the London Hospital. The unfortunate woman presented the most appaling spectacle, but, though the flesh in many parts of her body was quite burned, life still remained for about two hours, when death terminated her dreadful sufferings. Another fire was discovered in the dwelling-house of Mr. John Edward Brown, No. 8, York-street, Baker-street, Portman-square, between four and five o'clock on Sunday afternoon ; but, owing to the quick arrival of the engines and firemen from Bedfordbury, the fire was confined to the lower part of the premises. About the same time the neighbourhood of Conduit street, Regent-street, was thrown into great alarm by a fire being discovered in the premises belonging to Mr. George Vonstine, tailor and woollen-draper, No. 23, Conduit -street, which for some time threatened destruction to the pile of building. The flames weretonfined to the back part of the premises. The accident originated through the overheating of the kitchen flue. CAPTAIN MARRYAT, THE SEA SNIOLLETT.--- Such is the rapidity with which this distinguished writer produces his works, that it would at all times be difficult to ascertain which is the newest, but it is quite evident which is now the cheapest, if not the best—and that is " Frank Mildmay," the first part of which, price ls., with a fine portrait of the author, appeared on Saturday, in the new weekly issue of " Colburn's Modern Novelists." Thu entire work is announced to be completed in 5 Numbers, and this admirable production (originally published at 28s. 6d.) will, therefore, be accessible for 55., or elegantly bound for 6s. This is the third work belonging to the new weekly issue of Colburn's Modern Novelists, the two preceding being Mr. Bulwer's " Pelham," and the Disowned, each of which, containing four plates by Finden, and no less than 700 pages of letter-press, may be had complete for 61i, Od. bd. The new periodical volume (being the 11th) of the same interesting collection, just published, comprises Mr. Lister's celebrated Tale of F k Aionable Life, entitled Granby "—which is limy le be had complete, with a fine portrait of the author by Finden, for Gs, (originally sold in 3 'cols', like Frank Mildmay, tar 58i, 6d.) A CLEAR lIEAD.--A workman, employed in blasting the quarries near Ivy Drite, who had changed his powder dealer, explained as a reason, that his gunpowder was so bad, it seeme d as i f it had been blasted.before!— Devonvort Telegraeki LONDON MARKET. PitICE (W The highest prieelof Bread in the There are others who sell irons a h ill:A rate. BREAD. Aletropoiis is 7d. for the 41h. Leaf. .alf-penny to three half.p.2iie: below rincE OF Per Cwt. EELLS.—Jau.4 ...... —,.. New English Red Clot er6o:. 70.3 S3s 1 01.4 Ditto Ditto 365. 60a. 703 New Foreign Mit° —s. —s. —s. 041 Ditta Ditto New \Vhite Clover s`is. 003, 725. Oil Ditto Ditto —s. 51.5. tiBs New Trefoil . IS: 20s. 235. OM Ditto —s. Hs. 16s Tref°lium :Ss 02$ 35s English Carraway ...... —s. 50s. 0 , ,s Foreign Ditto —s. 535. 3's Coriander —s 10$. 14s Rapeseed. English tine rpor La, _ Per Quarter. St. Foin nye Grasi -.5.-3. s. Paf.:ey Grass Linseed, for feeding s4s. 58e. Ditto, for sowing Ditto, for crushing —s Ws. Mt, Canary 5. 443 4t4t. Hemp —s. 40s. 50s. Per Bushel. White Mustard 45 O. fit. Od. Brown Ditto fares J. 4.11. . Foreigo 37/. :Ilk t 0 0 0 11 4 1 , , l e o ! : • PRICES OF HO I 4 05 , „ PS . Farnham l'ockets (p a* cwt.) K.., Pockets Choice ditto. Kent Ihti•s 0. 5)';: 34 4 1 3(3 ):. : t o o° 4 35 1 11 : ; 1 SLISS',!X POCkt , ts Superfine ditto W tIIIECHAPEL HAY M A —Jan. 2 tlay Straw 26s 'd 306. 1,(1 _____,._ PRICES OF POTATOES AT SPITALFIEL).)S____...._ York Reds (from vessel) CG.ninon Reds 21. ss. to '2/ 10s. ditto al.irsli Champions 3/. Us. P.o 4/. Os. ditto Shaw; 9 o'. to 2/. 10s. ditto Ali:ltlaig IL :W. to 01. Os. ditto Coati_ ' _ PRICES OF LEATHER Per lb d. to 11. Per lb. d. d. Crop Hides, 30 to 401 b. each 11 13 H orse Hides, German lto 4 21 _ - i.o 51) ......... 124 10 , - Spanish CalfSkins,3o to 401 b. (doz ) 6 14 22 6 6J ...... ill 1.2 Bull Hides , .. -....-.......... 411 51. Butts, Vitriol - —5O tiO .17 25 ......... - -- English -.70 140 *ll :II --- I. °reign Foreign Holes lO 12 ---- srnall ............... 16 17 Di - essing Hides --,----- Shaved .... i 3 161 Basils 14 !. Bed Saddlers Hides ......... 14 IS . B r in es Horse Hides, English „.... 1 3 16 Should ers '7 E , If rounded 2,1 to 40 per lb more PRICE OF OIL. Rape Oil, brown, per ton, 50, 04 —Refined, 52.. Os. Oil Linseed Oil Cake at th e Mill, (WOO 13i. Os -Rape Ca Linseed ke, per ton, , 42/. 5/ ss. PRICE OF RAW FAT, per . e stone of 1411.). Price of Tallow (s stated by the Tallow 51 Rens) PRICE OF TALLOW, Town Tallow 4sls. (id. Yel tow Russia -Is. 6d. White —s. Od. Soap I)itto s Otl. Melting Stuff litto Rough '2ls Od. ' SOAP, Sic per 1.121 b. Yeilow Soap —5. b•Mottled —s. Od. Curd PRICE OF CANDLES. The price of good Store Candles in the Retail Shops is as follows: Candles, per dozen, 7s. Od. ; interior, (is. P d.—Moulds, Bs. 6d. Sixpence per dozen discount for cash. COAL MARKEL_J an. , --- 17 -- -------. ' Per Ton. s. d I Per Ton. tl.. Dean's Primro se is 6 I Silkstone Biram s. 19 0 Hol t well y l9 fl Thorpe's (lawber H a ll. lB ti O 21 3 I Walls End B ew i c k e and C 0... 21 9 P rd's ltedhugh P it ' s Windsor South Moor p 21 6 South eld Hartley 2O 3 W a ll s E nd Hotpur 21 I) . West Hartley Wylam 21 6 I Walls End W a l ker 21 6 I Walls End Lambt on ........ ..... 23 21 6 9 Cow p en 2O 3 Walls End St ewart s . ... 23 6 Hartle y - .. e 3 Ships arrived since l as t market-day, 12...... . ....... 3 .....______.........__ W . ()MAN'S TRUE LOvE.—We know of no book in which the unquencheable flame of wonwi's true love is more admirably pourtrayed than in Mr. Grattan's new work, " Agnes de Mansfeldt." The heroine of the story is a de lightful character, she is introduced to the reader at the Congress held at Cologne, :a spectatress of the gorgeous procession at the opening of the Diplomatic Conference ; she attracts the notice of Gebbard, who finally marries her, and in .her subsequent distresses and wanderings, she finds solace in the devoted attentions of his amiable partner ; the magnanimity and enduring affection of this distinguished pair, both in prosperity and adversity, are finely developed. The novel is worthy of Mr. Grattan's high reputation. DRAMATIC POWER OF " GRANBY..--1 , One (jof the most prominent characters in this popular novel ust published in The Modern Novelists)" says the Edinburgh Review, "is that of Tyrrel, son of Lord Malton, a noble black-leg, a titled gamester—a man, in comparison of whom, nine -tenths of the persons hung at Newgate are pure and perfect. The pro found dissimulation, and wicked artifices of this diabolical person, are painted with great energy. The part of the story where Granby compels Tyrrel to refund what he has won of Courtenay, is of first rate dramatic excellence ; and if any wishes for a short and convincing proof of the powers of the writer of this novel, to that scene we refer him. We are so much struck with it, that we advise the author to consider seriously whether be could not write a. good play." -On Thursday forenoon as a cart loaded with coke was proceeding from the gas- works in Peter-street, West minster, on arriving opposite,: the statue at Charing-cross, the contents were found to be on fire, and it was not little amusing to see a crowd of bystanders warming their hands at this novel kind of fire, instead of assisting to quench it. The thermometer sank down to 16 degrees of Fahrenheit on Friday night, in a situation not very much exposed to the easterly wind. COX SAVOR', Goldsm i th, &c., 47, C ornhill, London,(ADVERTISEMENT.—T. _ informs the Public, that he has considerabl e variety of SECOND-HAND GOLD WATCHES, any of which he offers at EIGHT GUINEAS each. They hay all been carefully overlooked, and are warranted.—Watches pur. chased in exchange. _____..,................,...... B Ilt TI-I,iT Oliver, of a son . ------------- On the 4th i ns t., in Half-moo n - street, Pi cca dill y, A i rs. W. E. On the 3d inst., at Cranbury Park, the lady of Thomas Chain berlayne, Esq., of a son. On the 4th inst., at Twickenham, the lady of the Rev. Frederick Sturmer, of a son. On the 2d inst., at Wood-house, Wanstead, the lady or Money Wigram, Es q ., o f a son. On the 2d inst., in Mabledon-place, Burton- crescent, Mn.s Fer dinand Br an d o f a daughter. MARRIED. At Little Bedworth, Mr. J oseh Shenton. Th e bl ushing bride is i n her Walker, se to Mis s Eli za b et h v enty - first year, a n d the bridegroom in his n i neteenth! On the 2d inst., at Hacheston Church, Suffolk, Captain the Hon. Henry John Roils, R.N., secon d son of the late and brother of the present Earl of Stradbroke, to Sophia, only surviving daughter of the late James Ramsay Cuthbert, Esq., of Grosvenor-square. On the 2d instant, at Leamington, Charles Malpas, of Lin coln's Inn, Esq., Barri s t er-at -law, to Georgians Anne, fourth daught er of Bodychan Sparrow, Esq., of the f ormer place. On the 24th ult., a t Glasgow, William Wright, Esq., to Bethia, second daughter of Mr. Joseph Robcrton, Glasgow. On the 2d inst., at Bradpole Church, Dorset, Reemt, second son of Cornelius Shenek, Esq., of the Paragon, New Kent-road, to Mary, second daughter of Thomas C. Hounsen. Esq, of Wykes Court-house, Bridport. D On the Ist, i ns t ., at Great Ma E lver D. n, at. the house of her father in-law, Dr. Tyler, Charlotte Eliza, only daughter of the late Tho mas Boultbee Parkins, Esq., of Ruddirgton, Nottinghamshire, and grand-daughter of the late Sir Thotraz Parkyns, Bart., of Bunny Park, in the same county. On the 2d inst., Anna Edwyn, 'Site of Matthew Knapp, of Little Linford House, Bucks. On the 28th ult., at Bideford, Devon, aged 73, William Turton, M.D., author of the well-known work of " Nature Displayed," and various others. On the 18th of November, at Vostizza, in the Gulf of Corinth, aged 22, Robert Llewelyn, Esq., youngest son of the late John Llewelyn, Esq., of Brempton. On the 2d inst., at Walmer, Crawford, the youngest and beloved child of Samuel Caldwell and Sarah Brandram, in his I Ith year. On the 4th inst., aged 78, Rachael, wife of Mr. Leonard Will shire, of London -wall. On the Ist inst., Marian, fourth daughter of the late Bishop Hull, Esq., of Chelsea. On th e 2d u l t., at Madeira, George Gordon, Esq., Lieutenant in the Sc o t s G reys, and third son of the late Alexander Gordon, Esq., of Newton, Aberdeenshire. On the 3d inst., aged 92, Robert Pulsford, Esq., of Great St. Helens, London. On the 31st ult., at Peterborough, Ann, the widow of the late John Cox, Esq., aged 80 years. On the 2d i nst., at Pimlico, Abraham, third son of Mr. A. Det towe, aged 13. On the 3d inst„ at Hastings, aged 38, the Rev. G. Percival San dilands, late Curate of St. George, Hanover-square. On the 7th November, at Greenhill, Manchester, Jamaica, Mr. James Dix, aged 33. On the Ist inst., at Carshalton, aged 96, Mr. Amey Simmons, of Bricktield Cottage. On the Ist inst., at Portland-place, aged 46, Francis Mendez, Esq., late of Calcutta. On the 2d inst., Dorothy, wife of Mr. James Bernardy, of Hano ver-street, Hanover-square. Bail On the 30th ult.. a ge d 20, M ary, only daughter of Benjamin ey, Esq., of Dalby-terrace, Islington. On the Ist inst., Mrs. Bateman, late of Kentish -town, in the 85th year of her age. On the 27th ult., at Torquay, aged 30, John Lea Edwards, Esq., of Dareey Hey. On the 2d inst., Sarah Henrietta, wife of William M'Call, Esq., of Norton -street. On the 2d inst., at Vimiera, Wandsworth -road, Lawrence Wil liams, Esq., aged 68. On the 26th ult., at Grove-place, North Brixton, wife of M r . J o h n A. Messenger. Elizabeth, the On the 25th ult. in th e Cl ose, S alisbury, Hannah, relict of the late R ev . Wm. Richards, rector of Li ttle Wilts Cheverell, near D ev i zes. O n the 4th inst., in Hampton-street, Walworth, Mr. William Westley, aged 81. On the Ist inst., at Shacklewell, Elizabeth Borville, neice of th late Samuel Provey, Esq., of Bishopsgate-street. On Thursday last, at the house of her son-in-law, Gren Gates Mrs. Mid g l ey , aged 80, relict of the late Samuel Midgley,e Esq., o Mrs. Cadley, widow of Thoma s Cadley, Esq., Cookridge, On the 19th ult., in A nglesea-place, Southampton, aged 87, only son of Charles Fitzgerald, isioi2ilailetihtosrli,:lot:fyaßa6g,etLdh,;.:2::: Edmund, Circus, Bath. On Wednesday, at Limerick, the Rev, James Charles Fitzgerald Redma t N n il lt , e , third son of the late Mr. Esq., of Shepperton, county Clare. .ston , aged On the 3 1St tilt•, at liel. e 8 years, Frances Jane, daugh of Greenwich, and of Crane-court ter ° o n f Fien.Oreet. London : Printed and Published by MURDO YOUNG, of No. 112, Strand, at Ths Sun (Mee, No. In Stra , nd, in the mull" QllViddlessx.