The Sun. — London, England, 1810-05-05 00:00:00

i , J e,q, taken ~to lay the returns heforo the iluus in the most perfect state possible, but he d.tu led much whether it was possible to procure a ci,rtect rein n ut what his Honourable and Learned Ffi,!tt,d r,-quired. It had been observed that there' tor utrilotrany.of *opinion among several of the :Nl , tub,:•rs on the. side of the House where he sat 3 ' b , u surely tfie same observatioas would apply . to 1--arrit-A Gentleman and his friends ; but yet he (Mu. der) denied ilidt it was made by any means a party questittn. EXCHANGE OF PRISONERS. Til i i Mr. SHARPE observed, that he had given notice of a motion relative to a fiegociation for an exchange_ ' •ot, prisoners with France; but as he understood this, Was now on t00t,,, and that many exertions Were mak-64, tlith hopes of success, for the present be ‘Otndrew it. ' - . . . • Si r .-T. TURTON ag•eed in ' the necessity * , of .a. • full attendance, which he hoped would be 1. case when the Bill would bct brought forward a se- Con , : ; ti Mt', The CHANCELLOR Of the EXCHEQUER Observed, ,that he'c,)uld not s , !e any ditficglty in the Hon. Gentleman's having procured. a large attendance, in 1, 1 1, - that case, those who opposed it would not be likely :-,, to be in view; -an opi.osition, he was confident, was !' totally exempt from party spirit. Sir S.-RomiLLY stated that the returns alluded to il by the Secretary of State were not produced on his but were a longtkne in circulation. The question was then put, and the motion was carried. s t Sir S. ROMILLY gave notice, that he would move on Monday for the returns ,of the convicts trans : . ported to New South Wales since 1 . 805. . ' - TRANSPORT SERVICE. Mr. „Husiossolsr, in a few preliminary observa tions, stated that he wished the -consideration of the navy Estimates, which stood for Monday, might be postponed in consepience of his not being. furnish= ed with certain pipers. He would now move, ‘,‘ That there be laid before the House, Accounts of the Hired Transports in the service, la ith their seve ral tonnage, &c. specifying their stations, and, the number ofseawen employed in navigating them." - The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER had no ob jection to the motion ; but with respeel to what his - Honourable Friend had-stated respe&ing the ,post ponement of the consideration of the Navy Esti mates, he did not see any particular reason for so tarrin g . There had been an *antecedent voteof 130,000 seamen, which was now increased to 145,000. On 'this subject he was convinced, from the knowledge hii Hon. Friend possessed in Naval afftirs, that he would have all his arguments ready on Monday ; when it was arranged to take these estimates into consideration, and those 'of the army on Wednes day. Sirt. POLE wished to make a few observations relative to the: Navy. He thought it proper to vote a sum equal to the maintenance of 15,000 men, if it wasfintended that the service should not be in jured. One circumstance, in point of humanity, ought to come under the inspection of the House : he alluded to those seaman on, harbour duty, who,, .after a period of .17 or 18 years services were then obligedsto undergo the severest labour among con victs. From the other parts of the estimates, this vote would appear unnecessary; besides, it would be preferable to treat better those men in the present aspect of affairs in France, many of whom have not been onshore since the year 1795 ; a reduction was absolutely necessary. 'The CHANCELL'OR Of the EXCHEQUER said, that all the Hon: Baronet's observations respeding the increase of seamen 'were made with great pro priety; The - House, however, would consider the extent to which it would vote. With reiPe6t to the Army Estimates, aSMonday and Friday. were occu pied with notices, lie a l ished them to be brought forwai'd on 'Wednesday.• . -Mre HusxissoN said, that he could not be fully prepared with arguments unless he obtained the pa pers. • He• did not wish, however, to impede the progress of public business. • Mr. WILBERFORCE expressed his surprise that there were no Estimates respecting the Docks . at Nortliftleci. , The question was then put, and the motion was agreed to. INDIA AFFAIRS. CREEUY, pursuant to -notice-, rose -to call the attention Of the House to the circumstances which 'occurred, at Madras, into a detail of which he did not think it necessary to go. He principally al luded to the events -Of the rebellion last summer. One thing he wished to premise,. that the affeelion of ihe people can only preserve otrr-eMpire there, andmat art handful of Europeans. When an-army of 150;000 men, which was colleted from the great population of India, when that army were spectators and parties in the con.flia between British Officers and the British Government ; under such circum stances it was next to a miracle, bow the Indian Empire could.sustain such a shock.. It was for the purpose Of br ingine particular objet is before'Parlia-.. went that he was about to move for papers.--,The first- set contained statements, accusing Sir G. Bar low's Gov.ern.nent, and taxing him with wantonly insulting the army and officers. The next desclip tion were connected with ,the Courts of Law ; but first be wished to state some laels. When the Cat natic was Ceded;the CiirriFiny look on themselves to dis Charge tide debts of the Prances; in consequence of this, the year before last a . ,certain number of per-;' sons were prosecuted for conspiracy and perjury, the Government took part with' the prosecuted persons, and this too against the call:of bona - fide credit. '',Viiree trials were instituted; and then the Govern ment exercised the greatest severities on the aCCI.:I - ordered them to .depart from Madras immediately;. and it appears that 'though One Pre sented- a certificate fromhis-pliysieian, declaring on account of his health, that-he could not be removed withontt endangering his life, they were inhinnan enouvh 10 persist, and the consequence was, that the man died. Thete were, Other charges besides front Officers .for unjust removal, which, together' Vith the trials, and applications of persons sent vq, form -the next set of" papers. He wished that proce.edings.of the Council, and Of Mr. Petrie,* se ion& in Council to Sir G., Barlow, could be obtained. The next objea which the produEtion of these pa . - s would eluoidate was, the view in which all-thee s proceedings.in,lndiahad.becn considered at borne bY the Conti ot areEtors. He had been informed that the opinions of that Court were equally diVided between Sir George, Barlow .and Mr. Petrie, and that by an accidental molive they leaded to the side of the latier. These papers were calculated, to bring before the House the whole of this important subject. lie ConclUded by moving,- that there be. laid on the Table a copy of all the correspondence that had passed between the Commander in Chief and the Governor and Conricil of Madras relative to the arrest- of. Lieut. Col. Munro, and the right of the Commander in Chief to consider his authority as definitive in Courts Martial. Sir H. MoNTGoMERY gave his hearty support to the motion. He contended that all the untortunate disturbances jit India had originated in the violence and . orpression of the Madras Government ; and. declared, that things had been done in the Courts of Law in India, which, had they been attempted in this country, would inevitably have produced a re volution. Mr. R. DUNDAS condemned the course which, the Hon. Gentleman had thought fit -- to,!pursue on this business. Several weeks ago that Hob. Gen tleman had moved for Papers respeaing it—a mo.; tion at which no one rejoiced more than himself, as he was most happy that the attention of the Holise should be called to it. Finding this, however, the Hon. Gentleman, after along delay, gave solate as only yesterday notice of a motion this day for a set of additional papers, much more voluminous than the others, and containing a great deal of matter wholly unconnected with the - military part of the question. With regard to that portion of the papers now moved for, which•'really bare upon the military question, he was as anxious as the Hon. Gentleman fur their produdion, solicitous' as he was to have the cause of the late unfortunate occurrences in In dia fully - developed and discussed. The Hon. Gen tleman a-serted, that any thing' like the mutiny which had existed among the troops in India was wholly unprecetlented., He wished that he could confirm that assertion. Hetrusted, however, that such an event would 'never recur; and he firmly believed, that the means which had been resorted , to, to suppress the recent disturb2nces, were those which were the best calculated to prevent their re currence. For his own part, he was astonished how any.set of men could have gone the length to endea vour to intimidate the Government of, India into concessions, as disgraceful and ruinous to thernSelves as they would have been destruCtiVe of the British Empire in that country. Deliberative meetings of military men ought not to be permittAl. They were wholly inconsistent with all ideas. of military diScipline. He did not believe that any of Wein dividuals who went the lengths which they subse quently did, had the least intention of doing so in the first instance. Of such a premeditated design he 'by no means accused them, but he trusted' that their example would operate as' a warning to military men how - they commenced ads' which were incom patible with military subordination ; and which-must ultimately lead to the subversion of good govern- . ment, and of the whole power of the State. With respel to Sir George Barlow, he was persuaded that the salvation of the British interests in India was at tributable to his undaunted fit mness, and to his-de termination at all hazards to maintain the character of the British Government It was Sir G. Barlow's opinionan opinion in which he (nr.llundas) con curred, that the nation had better not have a single acre in Hindustan, than possess it subjed to the "pleasure of any, rnilitry body whatever: The-Hon. Mover had stated, it as an alarming circumsthnce, that the native troops had been called upon to sup port the Govefnment against their own Officers. ,It certainly was' much to be lamented that circum-: stances drove the British GOvernment in India to take this step ; but he wished to know how the Honourable Gentleman could reconcile his assertion of the general dislike of the nativ6s in India to the British Government, with the solid proof which they had given of their allegiance to:that Govern ment, even in opposition to those very individuals by Whom they were in the habit of being daily corn -madded, and,who no doubt possessed their attach ment. As - for the appointment bf Sir George Bar low to the Presidency at Madras; all he could say was, that in coming into office 'three years ago-he faind,the Goveirnment of Madras vacant, , It come to be a question with We Court of Direaors whom to appoint to that situation ; for the appointment was vested in them,' although it was usual for them to require ,the concurrence of his Majesty's Govern ment. It was his, wish that a perwn of coin= petent qualifications should assume that Govern ment, either from this country or from Bengal, for it did not appear to, him that there were any indivi duals at Madras on whom it •would have been expe dient to corner the Presidency. Sir George Barlow had been seleaed because of his high rank in the Bengal service, and because of his stria honour and integrity. He was appointed, as superior to all the petite intrigues of-the place over which he was - to preside, and which intrigues it was the constant aim of •Government to discountenance and suppress.— Such was history of the appointMent of Sir George Barlow. When the papers came to be on the table, the House would see how far be had answered the expectations which had been formed of him. thing could be more censurable than The anonymous means to Which, in the-absence of all official docu ments, the Officers. had'resorted for defence. He was prepossessed against any cause -by such a mode of advocating it. r 'He repeated that for that portion uf the papers moved for by the Hon. Gentleman Which - related to the military occurrences,_ lie would vote with the-greatest satiSfadion : but these were coupled in the Hon. Gentleman's motion with do cuments so voluminous, and go unconnected with the military part of the qUestion,,that unless the Ses sion were protraded very much beyond its ordinary duration, no hope could be entertained of submit ting them to theconsideration of the House. Se veral of -the papers likewise which would be in cluded by the - Hon. Gentleman's motion it would .be unfit to publish. On- the breaking out of the disturbances in India., the Government mails had been stopped by the revolters ; Government were consequently compelled to stop the mail 4 them-! seltes, and there had come home a great number of private letters, many of them containing matter of -the most criminal nature. The House was aware, :however, that the Governor-General ofilndiaL with the ,view-to heal the wounds of the British Eno pire in that country,, bad adopted the'-course (with certain exceptions) of restoring to their rank and confidence all the Officers of the Madras army.' 'lt ,would not be fitting, therefore, under such circuit - 11 7 stances, that the private letters which he had men tioned shobld be produced.• They might find their way back to India, and do the individuals by whom they were written great dis-service, and the country no good. To the comments Of the Hon. Gentle man on the civil proceedings of the Government of Madras; he was not prepared, from the short ness of the Hon. Gentleman's notice, fully to, re ply ; but in some of those comments' he was sure that the Hon. Gentleman was totally mistaken for instance, in his animadversions on the part of which the Madras Government took in support of the Commissioners appointed to consider the Car-, natic Claims. With respeat alsO to the removal from office of persons upon Juries, he was persuad ed that the Hon. Gentleman was wholly mistaken. So far from having been removed, several of the individuals alluded to had even been promoted. In his observations on the removal of Mr. Petrie, the Hon. Gentleman had omitted several Considera , lions. He had not mentioned, that before that re , _ moval the Court of DireCtors had distinctly proved the condu& of Sir G. Barlow. Beside's, as it . was necessary that one of the three Councillors should* be removed, in order to make way for Sir Samuel Auchmuty, who had been appointed Commander in in Chief, it became a question whether of the three Councillors it was not expechent Co remove the one with whom there was possitive proof that Sir G. • Barlow could not sit at the same Council Board. The condud therefore of Mr. Petrie .was not the sole ground for his removal,nithough it did not fol low that it might not have had its influence.. He shoufd say no more on the subject, than merely to read a list of the letters,: which, in his opinion, comprised all that it was necessary to lay before the House. This'he acc'rdingly did. Lord A. HAMILTON reprobated the condul which had prompted the recent distubances iii India. It appeared to him also; that Mr. Petrie had been re moved on ex-parte evidence. The interests" of India could be supported only by truth and justice; and he gave his hearty. r assent to the motion of his Hon. Friend.. Sir J. ANSTUTHER denied that the conduct of the Madras Government deserved the epithets bestowed upon it. There did not exist in thiS or any other country a more honourable man than Sir George BarloW. He said this in answer to the charge made •ao - ainst him of intemperance and tyranny—a charge which; he was persuaded, the paperi, When laid on the table, would not bear out. On thecontrary, he was persuaded it would appear' that the conduct of Sir George. Barlow formed a most distinguished instance of forbearance, moderation, and justice. Sil l THOMAS TURTO.N condemned the.conduct both of the Madras Gcivernment and.of the Directors at home. Mr. GRANT defended the conduct condemned by the preceding - speaker, and spoke in high terms of praise of the line pursued by Sir G. Barlow, to which we were indebted for the restoration of tran quility in India. Mr. GRENFELL supported the motion of his Hon. Fi iend. Mr. P. Moot n disapproved of the policy of the Madras Government, and spoke highly of the state in which the army Was when Sir G. Barlow.took upon him the direction of the affairs of that Presi dency. Atter a few observations from Mr. LI.ISHINGTON, the motions for the various papers were put and agreed to, omitting that part wished by Mr. Dun das.„ HIS MALESTY'S MESSAGE. The House then resolved itself into .a Committee, to take into s consideration his,,,Majesty's - Nlessage re speEting the making a provision for his Serene High ness the Duke of Brunswick. Thep CHANCELLOR Of the EXCHEQUER moved, "That his Majesty be enabled to grant out of. - the Consolidated Fund a sum not exceeding 70001. per annum to the Duke of Brunswick." . . Lord MILTON would not oppose the motion, but thought there were _foods that ought to have pre cluded the people from being called on for such an additional advance, namely the Civil List, and the Droits of the - Admiralty. .. . Mr. HAWKINS BROWNE, Sir J. NEWPORT; and Mr. H. MARTIN, spoke, when the question was put and agreed to,„ and the Report ordered to be re ceived on Monday. .. .. The Order of the Day brought the' further consi deration of the Bill to prevent the Embezzlement of Public Money, which, on the suggestion of Mr. Rose, was referred to a Committee of the whole House, to sit ok. Thursday • next. Sir C. POLE gave notice of an, intention to pro duce a new clause on its re-commitment. SUPPLY. In a Committee of Supply, the 'following_ sums were voted :—_ 3395/. Bs. to Edward Stracey, for his services as Counsel to the Committees in the House of. Lords, in the last Session of Parliament. 50001. for Fees in passing the Public Accounts. 3,1001. kir delnyirg the expellees of the Civil Establishment of. the Island of St, John, in Ame rica, now Prince Edward's Island. i,500/. for repairing Henry the Seve' ntlis Cha pel. The House resumed; and the Report of the Corn . mitke was ordered to be received on Monday. . Mr. D. GIDDY brought up the Report of the Committee on the - drawbacks on salt for bleaching linen in Ireland, which was read and agreed to. Sir S. ROMILLY moved tile third reading of the . Privately Stealing Bill. Mr. HERBERT opposed it. The Hon. Gentle man proposed to have-the Bill re-Committed; in or der to introduce a Clause; , but the- Speakt-r in formed the Hon, Member, that .the Bill Iriving been engrossed, it was tob late to make his motion. Bill was then read a third time and passed. The Judges' Salary Bill was read a third,k,itne and passed. The Foreign Linen Duty Bill and the- West In dies • Insurance Bill ,were read a secand time, and committed for Monday. • Mr. A. COOPER presented certain_ Papers relating LONDON : Printed by RICHARD HARRIS, of No. 4, Martlett-COUrt, Bow-street; and prblisbed by WILLIAM ARMIGF It SC R I PPS, South IVlolton. street, GroFvenor square. ' At the SUN-OFFICE, Noy i iv, Strand, 'where Advertisements, Orders for the Paper, Letters for the Editor, &c. (post-paid), must 1)4 addiessl. to the Ordnance' Department; which were laid on the• table. The Carnatic Commissioners Bill, on the motion of Mr, Dundas, was read a third time and passed:. The. House adjourned at one o'clock this inorximg till Monday. • NEW METHbD OF DIVORCE:—A. young man in, Bewcastle, in the county' of Cumberland, who Was not at all timekOn the best terms with his rib, lately resolved to dispose of her by auction. Ni) bidder - appearing,. the Fair One proposed to her Lord to proceed 'to Newcastle with him, - when an opportd, nity would offer-Of his never more being harassed ' by the " pitiless pelting" of her tongue. Accord-, ingly it • was agreed; and_ this modem palilith takt- her plot so well as to entrap her husband into the, clutches of a- Recruiting Party in Newcastle; from • which he is not likely to be soon treed. BIRTHS. On the 30theinst. at his house in Cavendish-square, the Lady of the Hon. Major-General ,Crewe, ofa Daughter. On Wednesday last, at his Lordship's house in Grosvenor- _ place, the Right Hon. Lady Louvaine, of a Son. The'• same morning, at hei . father's house, Stoke Palk, neat . Guildford, the Lady of l . B. Delap, Esq. of the King's Dragoon Guards, of a still-born child. The same day, in .Portman square, the Lady of Alexander Baring, Esq. M.P. of a Son. .At Wanstead, Essex, the, Lady of T. A. Curtis; Esq. of a Son, On the 2.(1' inst. in Caroline-place, Guildford-street, the Lady of Captain I. R. Franklin; of the Hon. East-Ind Company's Service, of a Daughter. . ,The same day, the Lady of -the Rev. Thomas Po jays, of Fawley, in the County of Bucks, of three children, two boys and one girl . . ' ___. • . _ _ `Thursday, the Lady of G. Ward, Esq. of Soho-square, of a Daughter, being her isth . _ The same morning, the Lady of the Rev. Robert Stevens, of a Daughter. ,On the 3d inst. Mrs. Porteus, the wife of Thomas Por tcus, Esq. of Parliament -street, of a 'lldughter.- Fhe same day, the Lady of Frederick R. Coore, Esq. of Great Winchester -street, of a Daughter., At his house in Baker. streat, the_Lady of Hugh Barton, Esq. of a Daughter. • - ' MARRIED. On the z;d ult. at York, Michael Anne, Esq. of Burg wallis, Yorkshire, to Miss Tasburgh, of Boduey, in Nor... folk. On the 3oth ult. at-St. James's Church, Mr. Henry Love grove, of Great-Marlow, to Miss Charlotte Barlow, of jer myn-si rect. _ • . . _ 'cm Wednesday list, Dr. I. Hart, of New-York, to Louisa, S'oungest daughterlpf G Let , ien, Esq. late of Cla phalli. The same day, at Aylesfotd, Kent, William bowies, Esq• of Fitzliarris- House, Abingdon, Lerks, to Elizabeth, young est daughter'of John Spong, , Esq. of A ylesford; . On the 3d inst. Geo. Gipps, Esq. M.P:. to lane, youhgest.' daughter of lohn Bov% tiler, Esq. of. Hayes, in Kent. Yesterday, at St. George's, Hanover-square, %%rm. Frere, Esq. Serjeant at Law, to Mary, only daughter of BroMpton . Gurdon Dillingham, Esq. of Grunderburgh, in Suff-61k. DIED. On the 29th ult. at Taunton, in the 19th year of his age, Mr. Arthur Palmer Acland, youngest son of John Acland, Esq. of Fairfield, Somersetshire. On Saturday last, in York-street, St. farnes's-square, Miss Isabella Anne Hoare, aged is, third daughter of Henry Hugll' loare, Esq. On Monday last; after seven years severe afilialion, in the 81st year of her age, Mrs. Mary Blydesttyn, relict of the late Mr. John Blyclestey n, of Harp-lane, Tower street, Merchant. On Wednesday night. last, .at his house at Wing, in Bucks. the Ho. and Rev. Henry Jerome de Sali:„ D.J. one of His Majesty's Cha‘plains in Ordinary, and Count of the HOY Roman Empii - e. . . The same clay, Charles, the second son of Mr. R. Clark • son. On the 23d1ult at Wimbledon, Mrs. Hatchett, wife of Mr. Hatchett, Hotel, Piccadilly. , PRICE 0 37 OCKS VESTE ADAM. Bank Stock. 2,69 Nivy per. Ct. tool tot tool Irish S ver Cent. 4 per Cent. 84 - 3 per Cent. Red. 6 . 91 3 per Cons. 70,.1 1 1 Bank . Ann. 18 7 - toths India/Stock, India Bonds, 245. nr. Exchequer Bills; 6. 135. Pr . Omnium, Imperial 3 per Cent. Calas.Thr 24th inst. 74 71 . 74 To THOMAS TAYLOR, Esq. No. q, New Bridge-Street, London. 1-lOnotired Sir, ' • Edinburgh, Match it, tSot. T. BEG . leave to - inform you, that ever since the . year 1790, - I have bpen ailliCied with the Lues Vene-f, reaq, which, froM its obstinately resisting every course o l Medicine prescribed by the most eminent of the Faculty here, and , undergoing • several severe courses of . salivatioi l t and twice discharged from the Hospital, ••with little would appear to be of the most inveterate nature: in o' 4 spring of last year my disorder had got - to : such a head,. t s , • nearly to put a period to eXistende—l . hal a large itlc`', on the crown of •my head, one on each arm, 'and my let were broke out in a frightful manner ; my right was ilia ", fully painful, and had been in a statL'of ulceration tor tb 6 "" last seven years ; my- left. had .also two . large nodes Oil i t ' was very much discoloured, and gave me such excrutis" • ink; pain, particularly when : warm in bed, as nearly to de' priveme of rest; in thiil lamentable state, I .was recoil!' mended by Mr. J. Thomps'on, (1.41 m receive,i s o great cure by them here), to take votir Leake's Patent Pa:" which I began to tit on the 26 th of May in the cour se _ of a.fbrtnight, 1 began to . benefit--in little nro ri ; than a , month, the -ulcers on .iny heal and area We'd soundly - healed—soon aker, • the sores on my o legs heal t also ; however, consuierable discolouratin in the skin, 'and pain in the bone of the • lett, which, by die 3l sing of. Cod, and a little longer perseverance- in yourinvs' luable Medicine, subsided ; the 'nodes dispersing,' the s/''''"„„ regaining its natural hue, and the no . ch mai pains gradual" - going GIL thus-became, by yonr:lihera4 advice and M . ; dicine„ perfectly tree trout •my former. complaint) have recovered my former spirits and strong - di, and ato-t'e: come jolly and, fat,- in which State • 6 - wing Continued. tn" ;1 : t _months to the astonishment - of all who - knew ine, ILL . .' ~ a loss in what terms - to express 'my gratitude, but beg Y°'", for the good of usher &uttering mortals, to make this 111/ case as , public as possible, as I shall on 'every oceasi"' . in so. doing, you Will greatly oblige, Sir, your .0-at,:fto obedient, very humble servant,. A LEX. •NI 1J it,N. 14 •' Swan's Close, High-stre , ;t, Edinburgh. • • Witnes , :.•.!s to the above Cure : (Olin 1:1-!omPsoN, , • ... No. 3, New• Poultry Market; and 101-1 N NPINTOSI-3, Old esseßibly-C103e . , Uinburgh.. - Prepared and Sold by the sole Propri,it,rr, . THOMAS T, - .vtot r .Meinherof the Royal Ctdiege ()t 511 ' .goons, at his House, No. 9, New Pridgt..-street, Londr/ 111 where,'after a constant residence of more thin ..thirty-s" years, in a practice particularly dire red to the cur' : Q . Venereal C o mpl a i nts an d t h ose i nc id en t a l t o the i'a!ls f Generation, with that inviolable _secrecy , e 0 his profession should always observe in such cas , 2s hatters iii:liself, the advice and assistance be gratuito:!i t , ' , Y administers to persons taking' this Medicine,. win esteemed, by a 'discerning Public, as. an advantage sei dorn attainable and voutcd all ambiguity. • f 415.).501d, by his appointment, tor the convenien ceq t . those living at a distance, .at the L'ertunier's:,_ No. nx . .Alban's-strect, Pall-Mall ;, the Toyshop, No. ord-street; DisboroUgh's, No: 7, , Mr. Steers, Bookseller,. No. r, .Unlon-row, Little "ro,,*e;, hill Mr. Baxter's, South-bridge, Edinburgh; Mr. donald, Glasgow ; Mr. null, - DaMe.street, Dublin; an" 'one in every considerable town in Great Briratn:iii ItePuid, in Boxes of only each, r, , eirled up with tt Ly .; and plain ditecAions, whereby persons or either sex n i cure themselves. with ease, speed, secrecy, and saretY• y : t h Every Box sold in Great Britain seaied • a Stamp, on, which, by favour' of the ConrinissiJn e c or printed, at the Stamp Itice—" I'. t' Taylor, No. 9 , e , ct i Bridge-street,"--'-to imitate which is Feiony, and all o, are Counterfeitt, Itteffi Ev vitt!, of tii rz u psi EL irn t heir Pri ~i r ,A kc; , I _ver t C s o f t y Y e .!, h t Phll s yr b ee , i"on . • 1 4 ,t d ecays ' 4 I v r :Sh c o l i .t he Fa r y4' o‘ ', 41 1 / 4 ) er rtati o N'hol ey 1 )) • ‘ • 3 t h le ▪ br 111:41:1.1;1V. 11\ * Wit SpF. Aft ' , ter; Par ing A of" si st „, takiF