The Sun. — London, England, 1818-11-21 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. (Tt:ltT OF CIIISCFAIY, NOV. CO. THE I.OIID CHANCELLOR'S INDISPO , ITION. Pht! leport of the Lotto CHANCELLOR'S health, we are I.appy to say, was this day equally favour able with that of yesterday. ICE-CHANCELLOR'S COUIVF, Nov. '2O. TEMPEST V. ORE). Mr. HEALD, in this case, applied to his not - tour to confirm the Report of Master Stopliens, to whom the case had been referred by order of his ll.mour, on the Coll of November, eujoioing. him to invite what stint was due to Me. John Greg son, 011 account of 'sums alleged to have been ' ,aid by him- for the support of the Collieries of Lady Emily Vane Tempest, at Durham. Ihe Master hail accordingly made his Ileport, by which it appeared that a sum of 5.9311. was due . to Mr. Gregson, for monies advanced by !lino how irs own pocket. It would be recollected that Mr. Gr,gson hail been a ppoilved the Receiver g of the proc eeds of the m;nes in question, and t!iat it was in his capacity of Receiver that the som t • g otmo to he , ‘ne to hint had been expended. He ] had how ever to en divested of the office of Re ceiver, and a Mr. Thomas Ilanway Brigg. ap ininted in his st , ad , who wys at the pres ent time { icon,g in the execurioo of his o ffi ce. The Mas ter Was also of opittixi,. that as the mo o ney libel 64 bi'en ,olvaliced fur the particular benufit of the iCollie+ lee, it ooglit to he paid out of the proceeds arising from them, as well as the costs that had . - at:clued. The Lice-CnANteLLott —ls the present mo tion 0 1 , ! .05,d ? Mr. RotirELL, who appeared for Mr. Bart, said he tars ti, , l 1100 riiclud it' oppose it ; in tact, the parties were saiistied u id) the 16 port. . 1 lie Vic K-CHANCFI.I..OI.I could see no objection VI; under these circumstances to granting the too ''' tin. Ills 11000iir cook, tiot help, however. ad ..ii vetting to the laxity of practice which had been t . l introduced both into this, as well as the higher ..:-i hranch of the Court, which he sincerely wished could he altered. It was often re q uited of the Court to confirm Masters' Reports o n motion, when they ought in fact to come before the Court on petition. It should , ho wever, be his Honour's study, ‘vhile he had the honour of si t t in g in that Coort, to do that which he had ex p ressed his w i s h could be done at present. This motion , . praying the confirmation of the R e p ort, was ~ then granted. COURT OF KING'S Nov. 20. LIIIEL. The KING, on the Prosecution of Lord CITARGE3 SPENCva CHUttCHILL, V. WALTeR and BELL, Proprietors of " The Times" Newspaper. Mr. GoaNß's/. rose to answer a rule that had been granted, calling on the prom ietors of The Times to show cause why a criminal ieformat i o n .hould nut be filed against them tor a libel Ott Lord Chatles Spencer Churchill, published in The Times newspaper of the Silt of Jone. The ride, I , e said, had been g ranted on the ground that an account of at transaction in which Lott! Charles Spencer Churchill was collect - lira was a libellous account, and particularly that it W.ls a mls-statement of the evidence given by certain persons before the Coroner. The transaction to which the publication in question related was this : —Some time in May last, Lord Spencer Churchill was driving a gig in the King's-road, near Chelsea; by this gig, another, in which were a Mr. Tooke, Miss Sherwin, and another lady, was overturned ; and Miss Sherwin in conseqocnce cane by her death. The publication complained of was not the first account that appeared of the transaction, but one that was written in answer, and was sent by Mr. Tooke, to show that he had not been goiltytof the negligence which in sonic quarter ha] been imputed to him. He had em ployed a friend to draw up this account for him, had sent it to the Editor, requesting its in•teition, and this letter or account was the libel complained of. lie (Mr. Gurney) was surprise:l that is No bleman such as Lord Spencer Churchill.. should have been guilty of the indiscretion he had fallen into oft the day of the accident ; bot he was still mole sorprised that he should add to that the indiscretion of the present application ; for he mulct took to show that the conduct of (le Editor of The "litnes, in investigating this' business, was marked with the utmost care, and the most laud able anxiety to tell the truth, and nothing but the truth ; and that he bad every reason for being disinterested, there being no pecuniary consi deration whatever to inflaence his mind. No Imoney had been paid for the insertion. It was complained, on the other si de, that the p ro p rietors "i ... had refused to give tip the name of the patty who '-, wrote the letter inserted in The Times ; but this , refusal had been given at first , b ecause a pp lications bad been made on e the subject by two different ' person~, and it Otis 1111pM3ible to know which of them was properly authorized. Howev e r , the name was given up , with the consent of the E.,.Au thor, two hours before the present application was r made, so that there was the less reason for the t prosecutor's procycding. The application hail -'' been made. on the affidavits of Lord Charles Spen cer Churchill himself, of his groom, of a Mr. Jones, A Mr. Harris, who was driving another chaise at the time of the accident, a nd o f o ther ~, persona. In ttoor statement of the :ransactioo, no two of these affidavits agreed. That of Lord 9 Charles Spencer Churchill v a ri ed materiall y from - 021 that given by his groom : and as to the affidavit 11 of Mr. Jones, it was in direct contradiction to the i, 4 evidence given by him on oath before the Coro ner. It was stated too, that none of the wit -1 ne sses in their oxamination before the Coroner :4 b ad thrown any blame on Lord Chat les Spencer A 4 Churchill : whereas they 11;1(1 all blamed Lim, -,.- f. w o i i r t li t c i : t i t t t e w x a e s e pt il i e u t u r r; allegednot f or at n l i . a l l al l s ici ~ time on s b t intention, for :., impetuosity, impatience, a most culpable disregard i o f t h e sa f e ty a nd lives of other people, and a (le gree of bast e ~‘, bid, was even beyond the common 1 portion of youth. Mr. Tooke was going quietly, ' at the rate of about six miles art boor, on a '.: road not twenty-IWO feet wide. Lord Charles Spencer Churchill, who was cowing up ~beb lhind, had said that he called out, but was not -., heard. btetoit ,,, the imt ry in the gig were talking , and laogliiirg; hot he admitted 'Tooke j that Mr. i hulled f i f s horse inwards, and then alleged that his Lord,hip's wheel did not touch that of )Ir. Tooke's. The groom stated that Mr. Tooke pilled in to give way, and then directed his horse back again—an allegation which was contradicted by nine witnesses ; and by their testimony it ap peared that Loid C. S. Churchill was delving at a furious rate, or at all events, according.to all the f‘ffidarits and witnesses, M an improper tate. I.l , sides, his chaise coming up, made three paral lel chaises in a road only 22 feet wide ; a fact which evinced a degree of impatience and impe u.,it,/, which none could he guilty of who had t he least regard for others, or the smallest spallt of humanity. Jones, in his deposiiion hetore the Coroner, had stated, that the Gentleman at remping to pass was in the wrong. M a ry Smith, another witness, deposed, that the Gentleman was driving so last, that site had said to a companion at the time, " au accident 1111151 happen. " t had been represented to his Learned Friend on fhe other side, he had been instructed to suite (and that was the grounl on which the rule was granted), that there had been no impropriety in die conduct of Lord Charles Spencer Churchill, when, in truth, all the deponents had blamed him. Such were the depositions before the Co.. roner ; he (Mr. Gurney) would now show what I the libel was, and how it was iustified. The Learner! Counsel here read the alleged libel, which consisted of a letter, purporting to be from J. V., and giving an account of the tran saction. This letter, he said, came from a Mr Yeoman, who in his affidavit stated, that he was at the Coroner's Inquest, and waited in an adjoining room, with a number of persons who came thither to give their testimony as witnesses : t,ort they a ll w ithaut exception, while in conversation there, ascribed the accident to Lord Charles Spencer Churchill. Could this then be said to be a miarepresentation—a misrepresenta ion of what these persons hid said ? Could it he said to be a misrepresentation ot the tact ? The fact was vouched by the affidavits of several other persons. It was rental foible that one ot the affidavits oo tic other side stated, that no one was present at the accident ; but it was proved that there weie seve ral persons return - mg trout a funeral, and that one of them'sent the undertaker to assist the parties in distress. Tic learned Counsel then proceeded to read Mr. Tooke's deposition before the Coroner, which stated, among other things, that if Lord Charles Spencer CiiiiiThia had waited only one quarter of a minute, all would have been sate.-- After the accident, Lord Charles Spencer Charchill never took tire trouble to call and make arty in quiry, but only sent his servant to the surgeon's : ire should nut have said this, haul it not been ia sinuated on the other side, that Mr. Tooke had exhibited great want of feeling, and that he was intoxicated when he appeared before the Coronet'. Mr. Justice Baarattv.—What was the finding of the Jury ? Mr. Gum:ave.—Accidental death. Mr. Justice BAYLEY.—If there had been any negligence, how was it the verdict Was not man slaughter ? Mr. Guatiev replied, that the finding of the Jury on such occasions was often incorrect. The affidavit of 'Mr. Bradshaw, who was puevoted train attending, by the distress he telt at the loss of a child, and that ot another deponent, stated, that there was sharp diving, that is, impro per driving. Mr. Bradshaw swore, that if Lord C. S. Churchill had stopped half a minute, he would have had sufficient room to have passed; and that the accident was occasioned solely by his Lordship's impetuosity. Lord Charles Spencer Churchill was behind ; he saw another gentleman driving before him, and ou the right side of the road : he had nothing to do but to wait a single moment, awl all would have been safe : instead of this, he hurries on, strikes the wheel of the other gig, and pushes it to the post. This was deposed to by all the three witnesses, who gave their evidence before the Coroner : how the pro secutor could induct: one of tf,em entirely to alter his statement, he could nut tell ; but an applica tion fur a criminal information came out with a very bad grace from one, who, in order to fur nish a ground for it, was obliged to begin v%ith causing a witness to state that he bad been guilty of perjury. He had the affidavits of all those who attended to give evidence 143 witnesses at the Coroner's Inquest; he had the affidavits of all those who were on the Inquest ; and they were unanimous that the accident might have been ptyvented, if Lord Charles Spencer Churchill had been more careful, and less heated. He believed it would be stated on the other side, that application had been made by the friends of Mr. Tooke to the jury on the inquest to find a deodand : but Mr. Tooke solemnly asserted that no such application had been made. The jury were directed by the Coroner not to bud a deodand, on the ground that Mr. 'Tooke might, if he pleased, bring an action against Lord 'e;harles Spencer Charehill. Under these circumstances, the Learued Cotiosel submitted to the Court, that no ground whatever had been shown for granting a criminal information ; that the statement crri ginally given of the transaction had been amply coutirmed by the prosecutor's own account of it ; because lie admitted that he had at erupted to pass between two carriages in a road oaly 22 feet Wide; Mill What he called a moderate rate, thought it mi,;lo have been moderate for him, %sot' , fraught with danger to others, as appeared by the roost in disputable evidence. Ile next ,cuntended that the account published in The Times was no misrepresentation of what passed ti:ion the Coroner's Inquest ; for by all the evidence i' ap peared, that the accident was entirely caused by the culpable haste of Lord Charles Spencer Churchill. In the affidavits on the oilier aide, they had inserted an anonymous letter, written in very gross terms, to Lord Charles Spencer Churchill ; but they could not allege that it came either front Mr. Tooke or the Editor of The Times; and there Gentlemen disclaimed any know ledge of it. lie submitted, therefore, that where an application for a criminal information had ob tained a rule by means of a misrepreseotatimostich RS haul been set Up on the other side ; where that m i sinreseo r a i ion had been so completely so severed ; where a witness had been called to give evidence directly in oppositiou to what he , A before given on oath at a Coroner's Imptest, e I)3( 1 : Court would not only discharge the rule, but would discharge it with coats. Mr. SCARLETT having observed that his learned Friend had said nothing (at a second publication, Mr. GURNEY replied, he did not suppose that Mr. Scarlett would have alluded to that publica• !ion ; but as he had, he siosidd make some obser vations on it. It appeared that Lord Charles Spencer Churchill had answered the - first publica tion, and that Mr. Tooke had replied in the man ner which was now complained of as a lihtel ; and he should not have expected that his Lordship would have alluded to this second publication after he had seen the affidavit on the other side, (an affidavit which stated that his Lordship had never once called to inquire for the victim of his wanton impetuosity,)—he should not have ex pected this, because his Lordship might have been led to express some concern, even for the fate of a stranger, under such circumstances as those of the accident alluded to. How ever, the letter complained of as this second publication did not state on its own authority 'that Lord Charles Spencer Churchill had expressed so Dille conecrn as to have gone to Annul's the *ante night, but only repeated a statement that had been made to that effect in The Morning He rald ; and then said, that if his Lordship, as le pre,ented in The Herald, had gone to Altnack's, his conduct was very unfeeling. Now, if this statement of The Herald was untrue, his Lord ship mieht easily have aoswered it, as he (Mr. Gurney) should have done, Should env such res. Tort have been stated of him. It was oot likely that Lord Charles Spencer Churchill should not have seen the paragraph in qeestion. • -The Court stnpped Mr. RoßtNsoN, who was to have followed, when Mr. SCARLETT•rOse on behalf of the prasectition. Mr. Gurney, lie said, had not been so much the a4lcocate of the Editor of The Times, as of Tooke, and of Mr. Yeoman, the Geetlernan who di ew up the letter for him. He had travelled out of his way to give effect to the zeal they had affected in their statements, and to throw imputa tions on Lord Charles Spencer C.burehill. That Nobleman had also friends, who lia4 sworn 10 their statement of the case. But the Court was uot to try no the merits or demerits of his driving, but t . vhether they would give countenance to a statement-- Chief Justice ABBOTT.—Tbe Court will not give any countenance to the statement that has been -made by refusing this role. The question as to the propriety of that statement may be tried elsewhere, though this rule is refused. Mr. SCARLRTT said, that it was an undisputed fact, that atter the accident happened Lord Charles Spencer Churchill gut out of his gig and rpndered all the assistance possible : he sent to the Surgeon to inquire for the Lady, gave his address, and ex pressed his wish to be examined on the Crooner's Inquest. . He stayed at home all the night in great anxiety, especially when he heard that t!q , young lady was dead ; and it was only because he was told that his presence would not be required by the Go.: roller that he forbore to go. Then came the statement in the Newspapers, that the death of this unfot touate lady was occasioned by the most wan ton carelessness ; afterwards, a passage in Tae Ob server, begging the puhlic -to suspend its judg ment ; and thou the statement complained of, which contained a gross misrepresentation of what had passed before the Coroner : for Mr. Jones, in his affidavit, swore that he did not impute blame to Lord Charles Spencer Churchill before tire Coroner. Neither did Miss Smith -- The Court —Yes ; she says that he was driv ing as fast as he could ; and - that she observed to a lady, that an accident would happen. Mr. SCARLETT said, he would ask whether, if after the verdict of the Coroner's inquest, Lord Charles Spencer Churchill could be liable to pu nishment for manslaughter ? Certainly not. If then the Editor of The Times had publisha the depositions alone, be would have done wrong, because they were an ex-parte statement ; but he regrets, first, that he has them not, and then publishes the StAttsinent of a partisan. The defence put on affidavit did not contain the evidence of persons on oath, but mere ly what was said in conversation by some persons 'in attendance, who were not examined at all. This was not all ; for a few days after Lord Charles Spencer, Churchill received a most scurrilous anonymous letter, telling him, that it the laws - of Ids country could not try him Irk murder, he would be punished by his own vile conscience. The active party in all this, it seem ed, was Mr. Yeamao. Mr. GURNEY.—Mr. Yeoman denies any kno*- ledge of the !eat!' : as do all the defendants. Mr. Scatteerr then said, he abandoned that letter ; after that came The Times of the Bth of June, containing the letter about Annuls's. Chief Justice ABBOTT.—There you see the re ference to the autborot the statement, The Morns ing Herald. Mr. SCARLETT contended, that a libel was of ten contained, not in the statement of a fact, but in the pointing of it, at The Times hail done with respect to the statement of Lord Charles Spencer Churchill's being at Alktack's. Mr. Justice BAY LEY .—Was there any interval between the publication of the fact stated in The Herald, and the second publication in Th e Ti tne o ask this for the purpose of knowitig it Lord C. Churchill could have answered the statement in The Herald. • Mr. SCARLETT said, dab did not appear upon his affidavits. But Lord C. S. Churchill might never have seen the stattinent ita The Herald, though the Editor of The Times had sufficient leisure to hare itiqeired int' t he trut h of it, ii h e had so chosen ; but the libel had joined tic o facts together to give a point to loth, and imply that Lord C. S. Churchill WAS a young man so devoid of all humanity as to neglect every feeling that such an occasion must cad forth. • This too was stated without any regard tc the contradiction contained in The Observer. 'she Editor of The. Times bad only given tip the lame of the writer of the letter that appealed in hit paper, two hours before the application was n o ise, so that it Was too late to recall it. He (Mr.i e aste , t) trusted, at least, that a young man who tad felt severely, and had vindicated.himselt from ill imputation of want of feeling, should be allowei this mode of clearing his character. MTN , . Chief Justice A tiaoTT.—The Court, 111 charging the rule applied for, pronounce no 0 1 1 `"" o t I on v.-l:at ben spoken of, to HI , : 1116" , to Lord Cbarlea Spencer Churchill's case , 01- the his conduct. it appears, however, 0 4t ° , l "„ v , he evening of the accident and the tolloWing " -J O condacted hi;nself with feeling and proPri et g ~- s of , , the Court cannot allwv this opportunity ° r o r.' withnut an observat ion, that the driver ° f !„., e to riage behind ano:.her is to relax, an d g ive , e ; -- pt o hii atrui %vet., rite Co' nor sec hot at)! 11la clia -- ..e" - / / N „ te behind another is to relax, - ,-, „ nit ) precursor, and nut to pursue and - litic 1 - , is with heedless velocity. It appear s fr°fl cos lii davit s On both sides, that ex - p arte stat ril ,i tlie • if P r , re sent into public, b , ; both partie s ; '”' c ots ' that 0 „ i tirt eatinut help lamenting thst such state ln irbe , 0 re ,,,, i - but too frequent in the public rio ts ', r ito.4 .Vt,„ P h nit therefore discharges the rule, svithou` r t . ARE ' the P r ~ Ar), unclog astir opinion upon the merits of •on 7. l.t t ii i : t lg o s r ii ' ci s iiel c isi a , s t e loio ; prb:;)uictien,flittrilo,bisnyh‘a::.iftitybt eoc h ti.l a s ci b .l.:ri ee :i t l na s , -2 o i It. e n i 3 . ; :i l , u l' i r r a e s , ,,' .;:, I it , z o . , erne p i 7 . 11 4 11 1 '1 r 14 V ,lion. If Lord Charles Spencer Cllarc.) ler • 4 -oh • t oo t ' , Th, e( en aggrieved, he may find redress n't dii- ide of proceeding : but though the COll% the ePP/ orq . ,; arges the rule, it does not see any iitllt.; 1 I ,is • 7f, tio„b, • to s o t 'a s , .iot T i l o ie f trl,i,el„,delifi.ellisi(tlat,ritleiteotoernetitbl: I t il is l i c i bar gd, . ' . . a .4' .°ren *4 I , , 4 2 , , . b e , -, it without costs. fi e ti ,._ - Zi eV .' CRINIINAL INFoR NI ATIos. • ci' t'e on. t rty Mr. GURNEY Inoved for a role it) she' r 6 1,,1 '4•„,. fl} a etitnioel information should tio c c N tl ;,,,lley e 'l, ...,,i rp, ;.inNt two iMagi.,:,trat es of the (;,runty ('' -- , ; i ) o fi ' P • i x T i ( n t g vli c c , 7 l. e r ? l i l a , t o i i v es r e l t i .i t;;; l i t t l i i ) h i e l t i . ( e l o f s r: . u a n it t i l t , - ) l b i r c c i ) l , l ,lo l 3 , o : .1 ., 1 •:::: ,7 .): " ,.,.. • AO' t is "e) it property of Barber Beaumont, l':', , tl• l''. ir e , . 0 10 7'?n,„,, , strate of the Coun•v of Middleses• The 4, 4, 4, winsel rounded hi; application !Ton ill: :mice! , ,t. of that Gentleturn, which stated, in 0 1): ' o r t :), i,c - TP74 tat souse tout since he had purch,iseld the pil(1'• l" uiltling grouud at .•••hepliet (I's Bush, "3 r t ' le 1 1. /IL: use sit erecting thereon some te noile nts iN 'i t ly,i i• : i to tb, ;le of Cuese a tettaut hail a pplied t 0 t he hi ll I 14 0 , I ‘ , ' l t t e' t they (i ti n a c :l i l i ;:) i t i n t t " i i t ' ne a tt.;Vll:l);LeilreertSillelite'e-ri.111; tet.:flil:l:l' i file g r i ll ri A' . • ~ Ito' • t , ,, ,. s alio!), Oil various pretences, first statior t iliir lie uu ; e t ' r e i r i . i e q : l ). -c‘. )t i t i t ° l:inp l were ete t i l l . o I b ,A u t il l t e ' o j e t , :lll, nte): : ) 1 1:;: : ' :: . 1 .1' ' 11 ;:0 4 ,1: ' : best. oby-ct ions being removed, auother °lose'', 4,, ,1 . c0 ton was made, and the license wAs tOdY „,eir(P: . ki.f o :' n the ground that the applicant's rec l " ll is ter ° ; . 4 - 4 z, 't or y certi fi cate was not sned Ii the ' ' illi lic y l)s t ' 11,,,, t) lie parish, as required bylaw, althongl) in f ile l 't: ". "' Nt s, I ranted other licences to other pe rs()l)s' l lo4 ( 4 , 4. awe neighbourhood, without. iiaeir e l '' lli ) (ti e , ~ WI . t ? ler, vith such supposed requisite. A Cor rII I" E , ad l ' l , tki„ vas I s distinctly sworn to as iiitit,encimr tl e -t) Or ti t't. , , , e ila • .4, i , t those Gentlemen, and the Court 6 " 11. -5/ ,,,, ep, O bbew cati Se. chf •-‘ -----'"----'''' 4 )1, -, 2 1h,, ~,,.. , t , 90., COURSE OF EXCHANGE, Fut DAY, N° ..• t , i 11 '. N t il "if., nisteidani )itto, at Slept.. . ll ,2 ' e ,"ty ;. qt r fit) tot terd.aro - , q ii , .111 1 ii ,§' ' Ati 4 lh titwery 5 .i'l'' L- ittnlin ••1 '';) .„; 9 0 ( '• 1 • 1 ts' kltotia q:3 . 4 'rei 'arts, 3 Day's, sight • ‘ , 4 15 0 117, •._ k>i /lit° 7,5 1 6 ht • '''' ioindeatix, ditto rant, tort on the Main . i:l9 f ig c oo . r• ks t , 4; : , . . , a .. . 1% , iladrid :ittliz litia 3il t , set ill„ ....... • 3 . 1 4 Viltraitar . tjfi 33reelona ............................ • 39 4 bl 3 L -i ' l e ' .d g ? l i t ' : , i l . . ' . l . ) . ~. .... .....,[t.."0,t—1Nre57,i!t,0:,,...1t.a.1.. . L . ..iv: : 1 2 : , t s° l,gt . Ot• 1 4 l! N , I• • tsoy , 1 1, p ‘ . 1' Palermo Lisbon • 511 i .... s ti,i i , pluotf. Itii•Jaueir ,, .. ....................... ... 66 I.)ulum . , .‘s-1.....cm.b......9,.. 1 ,,,,,.. cent• Agin of the Batik on Hollairl.... 2per Cent* os' ' 1 / 4 1 . ti P er • ush er 8U1..1.10N. 0 , 1 Portutml Galt}, in Coin .................. L ° 5 11 NI,V Dollars ........................... .') 6 ' Silver, 111 Li,11,3 ~. •• ° ::>/' i q„-A s h , .011 P c at Marlc ( e :° t. Al:3.lAllKET' s•trt.., Ships :,,sld. 0* t'' 4 44 ' 0. i , - tltts 1:211 Newcastla ...... 1t0.... . .• • - 15 ' . od. 1 " ~.s t '• '• t, ' a t Sunderland 3.5. ,to 141 '. v.l 21 .• ... •• • • • CO . 5 IPI 9, t Cinders .... t. ........ •' 27 '• lik: ., -tt( , 1 b•• t,i * NovE-;.:-Ltsft)."). rfi c :„:„. e:,', , tec,:tih,4l, _-_----- 1 O• e 1 .! , ,,,I, BIRTHS. l oth i fi. , : j . 5 46 4 1 On the 18th in3t, at the h ous e „f Vi s count l''''''' t - Carl' iti ti' i ),"Iti . , .f 74, •I C'ounnander in Chief at Plymouth, the Lady ( . 1 1 . itei'v 1 • . \if' ' • • i ' ,, non. Fleet wood Peliew, of his Majesty's ' l ' l • a t AI. fi t naire, of a son. ile 10 1 1 d t t .,,,tr ; On the , tt)th inst. at Little Eastchealt, 1 • • ',4l'qi;':' Wifliani Noakes, of a son. t• e4l 'Ow! — 3 l" t'li t • 1 .NIARRIED . „„du ft . ,sti' •• 'iris ',.e 11r. 13fr AO' , • i ‘t ' 4l l* On the 17th inst. at Preston, the Iler• • , 000 i „ t I\ p tl y _ t i , to Eleanor, youngest daughter of Nic ll ` )l3 ' 05 . ' C" ' 4 1°:\V 1: ' 1 Of : liat town. . ,Ja t)1 1 ` .., of ith,gsto t ~..,, 1 tb,ll)i, I On the 18th,inst. 1. Isaacs, Esq. ti t n, Mi,s Levlson, of Haytlon square. i, .t.i He' !*ti;. 1) ' 5, o f IP l ''''' '.3r y 4 It ' Z' , t, DlEf). On the 18th inst. Mr. Francis w'. Cites, VO S • 1 1. coachuial.;er, aged 2.1. A street, ehtt H ie o i l S b t o li n i i i . ist. Betsey, the, wife 0:::1'.;•:::-031:;,:-4.!:31.03cle .144.,1:;5t;i‘%tt5,,,i, On the i9th inst. Alexander Chow, , 0 '',9• e .4 ' ' Regent's-park. his e p r)th Ye3r;):]2 lty., , ‘„ , Some day, at lirtninierituitli, in :;i iiIS t , th tu il . , l Bore, Esq. late Purveyor to his Majesty s 1"r ___ ~,IS, C p :::P r . ( - , ‘ 3 ' s ------ --- ..1.00.. 1 !:11,, , ,1, , t i i i k t A' l'' PROVINCIAL Bnan, .I.:ll.ittAGEs, cf ''' el 0 14 11 tll,l ,t 6 4 , r, • . N . • Bit:TU. ~i e pay ° 0 , 4 il. e Lately, at Felthom-hill, S'orhsliire, " , I, 4, 4 - ~, ..,,s 51 ' k'' V l c Quelitin, of the loth 1t__..........„,...,_0val litt,:ors, e'r 3 '°". pit °r ht 4411 MA SAO E p. w. 3° , b , n o n, is s,4' Iti'Dti o i t On Tuttirsilar se•nnight, at C h e ltell . hr: • c idewn it . l d a vr , I h tl i ti .! nephew ot the hae Mr. Pltipps• " 1 j . o fC. 0' 10 1i, , , 4 111 II cestershire, to Susanna, secund daughtei el f\''‘3l t.:til,'4' cant° o. liti "ct e 'll of Pad bury. :1 I 'r‘. M r ' ' f • 0 11 ' ttc s q, Same day, at Aston, •Xtirwtc.:s ii -I tt.aral l '°' r 1 • 'Mrs. Anti Iliitw , , late of ( orentr".• _ N ii s s ...,- „,,be , 5 • -t• l i `',.pli ~#.\• Al, Sanie I liar, Mr. Alit:llia:lt Cox, 1 " ' 6 ..1i IT. 3 .•- , 4.,,,.• IN ) vi Birmingham. ' ino the I t „ k.. 11% ' . 1, 4 4, qt .. At St. Mary's, R . :the:lily, irch n ;''buldi , " !i lia. I' l ll' l '4 u- •,h lin't,t"• E , u• of the Comity tn , v f V , ' ' II 11 4 '' N daughter of the late Henry Prim , = , " l gr , 0.. N w .: ---L--''"----- worcceert ';11t1"'lit:. ft;Er• „,,,et, , tre e to; () . p i " Lately, at his house in Ful' Thonios •:;wintlell. .... bon a in r ' . jo rf 1 • 1 1) .t : 11 ( 44 q ate-'" . or ecaf e 5 !, )a v ll iii..S l Sui!Cellly,Oil the 17111 i ii t. at 111 ' ,i„.geo'l•ti,e g e r ; , „;i. 4,,.,P•) ), W ove,ter, .I.ILII I) atigchtici.l, I s'i ' tote of olo ptc i to p, • k•I, li, I Oil IVedm•sday ee'nnight, '..klarY , , wont , ' plytliP i . - 1,," 1 1j,.'N Reed, Nlirn.,ter of St• John's Chave', else' 11e',,i..,,ter• f l'ily. 4 ..' , i "tit On Monday last, at 13rixton 11"-„3,e, r e , .: 0 , 3 1, 0 a‘r. % , , ,i i. , , ,i: ii . cholas Art,rr, E , q. of Saitti;ertillsajeldou P ' fever , '''' 3.i t t , Lately, of typhus levor, Nit' ' ' .nlitt s ~./ h t : ).‘ f tsr more, Irlan. ,i t ,, o • _...---- ~, ''' Li ti .. , 1,,,te1y. in \Vest I'as-li-street, l)il.• ~.----" 6 0.: ' ..........--------, Of 0 ., .1 Patricl; Byrne. _.---- ,,,f r`': • V j . 0 /.0 • -- --- __ 91S, 1.., ; ,,0 " 1 LONDC'YN: Printed liy J. B• CA ai ,,i p:,,. at ~ Of . Ornin•fd•stroet, Qneen-siii•iirei aton_fit.,etoent,/ SCRIPPS, of Na. 7, Soot! , ' Aare° '.,.t , . ~..,.••:, otiiec, Nei. Ile, Strand ;Rus t ere pe a rl"' kt • '' 1 , \ • T,ettQt s, titc. (nost-imiel) he 7 . , ~5,,..:0003,', ~ . ~,,,,mrri,-,,,,virt.., ~.. , ,___ .., _..740,071V044'' - .."'T I 1