The Sun. — London, England, 1810-04-13 00:00:00

C ,)uld be made to bis Hon. Friend's Motion. If ti House passed over such a tratsa&ion as this, they. ought never again to assume the name .of Guardians, of the Public Pnrie. He admitted that Secretz-iry was extremely culpable, but the Board were little less so; and they were the responsible. persons. The CHANCELLOR of the EkCHECLUER, while he allowed that there was some blame in the business, declared that the 'censure contained in the .11on: Gentleman's last - ReSehatiOn was infinitely greater' Than the occasion dentanded; nor was the state- - ment .of 19,0001 - . being lOst. to the public, from the oinisson to take securities frorn The securities ought to have been 50001. froth the principal, and two collateral securities of . :41).; now .it was - only these two list that . were loSt the ; for the principal was - yet liable for :he ibi'mer 'sum. If the Board had wholly tiegleEled zkeir dirty in this case, they would:- have beetvinf. 4f.cusable ; but the letter which by their dirt died he:! S:cretary, Mr. Crewe, .wrote to'Mr. Hunt on 25th of April, t 807,. sheaved this was not the' easy. It was impossible that the ,superiors of stack an otfice, pressed as they. were by the consideration of .•ratters 'of:great importance, could follow up the art of their va ious measures with any thing like witioteness. lire principal fault certainly lay 06 the Secretary; but when the wanner in which that - 3eritle-i man had tirr so many years 'discharged the laborious owlei of nis office was considereil i , he trusted that the House would be inclined to • pass the matter over. Mr. BARHAM supported "the Resolutions of hiS Elvin. Friend, lvtd ridiculed the,stipposition that . the irtitoduction of a Bill to In - event futureeliil, should be considered a substitute•fOr the cen,ure of the authors of those thatwere past. . • . s • Mr. WHIMREAD could not_ refrain.from making one or two observations. Much had! been said of the great duties which the Board of Ordnance had to perform. The faa was, that they sat three , days in the week, and four hours•on each day. He un derstood that it was the duty . of• the Secretary °fa ?vibe Board to lay on the table of that Board the ,retUrns which had been made to their orders.. Did Mr. Crewe lay on the table the return to the order of the Board relative to . Mr:, Hunt ?—(Mr..Ashley Cooper answered across the table in the negative.)— Did the Board then read again the minutes.of their fast proceedings'? If not they negletied their duty. But it seemed that they were to be excused from t; , e great pressure of bu4itiess upon them. There had been no Master-General of the Ordnance for the last month. If there had been one, therefore, his I.lace for that time would have been a sinecure. I; the business of the Board of Ordinance could gO on for a month without the presence . of their-most ~-tlicient officer, was it not evident that had that so ernumerary officer been there, it would have been his duty, as it was in his power, to 't.r.ke care that the Pubic should not be defrauded ? The Right Hon. Gentleman talked of the severity of the Reso lutions. _l\f - w, 'with the exception of one word, stet were Resolutions of faa:alone and with re •pect to that word, if the House did . not mark such a. transaction by.the term " aenSurable," it. would be in vain (were it not for a sense of duty) to bring fOrward similar - allegations in fatore. It seemed, however,. that a Bill was to be brought in to prevent sticfrtran-adions in future.' In hi, opinion, one of the in( st elxped:ent modes of- preventing future evil uas to punish , the authors of the past . ; nor could he coneive a more ,-fret-tual triode ofpro ducing future evil, than to allow the authors of the past to escape with impunity. Mr. G. JOHNSTONE, satisfied that the loss to the public by the omi.sion to take 'securities from MI. Hunt amounted to 50001. only; and not' to ►0,0001., proposed to modify the resolution to that effect. He also proposed that tbd resolution of censure should run as follows : That it appears to this House thatithei aster-Ceneratand Board of ( rdnance have been guilty:Of a tieglea of 'duty in tailing to tike seenrities.from I osepkilunt, , Esq. -a Member of that House, on his appointment to .the Tredsurership,of the Ordnance, in conformity to the instructions of Char, 11. By adoptiug such a resolution, he thought that House would not press too hard ou the Board of Ordnince,, and that at the same time it would do-. „. its duty. • w ; • _ . Mr. CALCRAFT declared that. the Iion: Gentle, men opposite seemed to set at defiance all the - prin ciples by which 'pnblie d. men ought to be governed . For what purpose_ were there five members of the Board of. Ordnance? For what purpose had they-: suchlarge salaries ? Who . was Mr. Crewe.? A most: respeanble individual certainly, .10.1t.,0n1y;. the Secre tary of the Board, yt hose busitte. it,..wasto. see their own orders carried fily into *:i . pcution. The ha ' lance against-Mr: Hunt had nernr,fieen. known to the Board till it was fOund in the report, on, the - table. Could the Hon. Gene ernan opposite say that it was ? - (Mr. A. Cooper replied 'in the afiir' rnative). That was so extraordinary that.if he had, ' not heard the Hon. Gentleman say so she would not' have believed it. In equity the . Meinbers. of the . Board ought to make good the loss which the pub- . lic had sustained from their tieglea. If the House passed this over, he, as a member of the community who . .wished the Honse .of Coinmons to be respeei ed, should tOicerely lament it., .He was astonished to hear the Chancellor of the - Exchequer endeavour to throw the blame from the I3oard, and assert that the Secretary was the most censurable person. The Board were responsible, and the Secretary not cen surable. Were ,he to selea . the Member,. of the Board to whose peculiar department the duty. that bad been negle&ed belonged,. he would say' that it. belotiged chiefly to the Clerk of the Ordnance. • . The first resolution was then agreed to. On the second resolution being put from, tie Chair, Mr.. COOPER obseryed, .that, as the H.n. Gen ' tleman had been so personally severe upon him, lie would state a faa which occurred when. tip:! Hon. Gentleman occupied the office that he. (Mr. COopery ~had then the honour to bold. A new Agent, a . Mr. Ridge, had been appointed at that period to the l i Corps 'of Engineers, &c. through whose hands. above, 97,6271. passed in the yea. It had been ,omitted, however, to take any security upon Mr: Ridge's Aptiolotnaeni to that office: 'Mr. CALCRAFt said, that, the Hon. Gentleman seemed to _have resi:rved his notice of this 'circurn ionce .as .a kind of masked ;battery against him, the etiett Of which, however, : Le had a coat of mail which Pt t evented - him from feeling. If lhe Hon. Gentleman wOuld,bring the circumstance before the House, and`sheW that when in office he had not done his duty in the most correct, conscientious, and coMplete . manner, he would be much obliged to . • him. If there had been a negle6t• in this case he had net er heard of it before, nor did he know that it was attributable to him. Had the Hon. Gentle man asked the Lieutenant 'General and the Sur veyor General whether it was in cotiforrnity to the inStruaions' to the Board to take securities for Agents? (Mr. A..CoOper answered in the affirma tive.): If sd, .although it was too late for -censure, the Board of Ordnance to which he had' had tbe honour to belOng, were unquestionably culpable. He should' feel that he was hitosell culpable. But were he tentimes more culpable that %%mild be no sef-offagainst' the . neglea of the present Board in the case under disetpsion. Sir C. ADAMS Made a few observatons, but in-a tone - so Mandible, that we were ithable to collect the substance of what he said. The CHANCELLOR 'of the EXCHEQUER Said it had not been the - intention of the Hei. Member who; brought forward the instance of'' neglea WhiCh 'had occurred while-the Hon:Gentleman oplioSite was in, an Official sititanon, to urge that as a justi&ation of the neglen complained of in - the present instance. It had not been produced as a set oil; but it was per fellyn natural for his lion. Friend to , state that cir cumstance, and the . Hon. Gentleman'(Mr. Calcraft) ntiOtt ba not unreasonably expected to look wi'h a Milder eye oh the faihogi of ot hers, when lie .found , !bat even lusOWn perfection could-not save him from error, 111 r. PONsoNDY contended, that the nm'.leal,.of ofNers uaS excuse for those al present in ofce. No cnrCurn•tances" had been 131-Ought forward to establish the-truth of that siatentent, and if it were proved trne, it would be recrimination, but could not: amount to a justification of that whiCh they complained of. The Honourable Gentleman op posite ought to bring forward proofs of the fia he coial& If he did that, as iu the present . instance, he woold• censure the neglect before them, so would he censure that, it censure were deserved. , The resolutions were then put and agreed to, except the laSt, on which Mr. G. Jon.Nstoisia moved, as an athendmerit, that the words " guilty of an omission .of duty i n negle6lins to take 'security of Mr. linnt, confor mable to . the instiuiitions under which they a6ted," should be substituted for the words of the original resolution. , After,a short conversation across the table, be tween Mr..Calcrait and the ChancellOr of the EZ chequer, the amendment was canted without a di vision. Mr. CALCRAFT observed, the Chancellor of the Exchequer had argued that no neglect was charge able to the Board ; but voting as he bad, he evinced a conviction of the reverse being the fa&.' He was obliged to the Right Hon. Gentleman for .his vote; but he could not compliment him on his consisten cy. He defied. the Hon. Gentleman opposite to Make good the charge be had brought forward. He always called that Hon. Gentleman his honoured friend ; but if lie would bring the charge at 'once, he would call him his thrice honoured friend. IQs the Board had been voted guilty of an omission of duty, Le•lxould move, "That for such an oinissi,ai the said Board is deemed worthy of the censure of (Ns Ijoese" Mr. G. JOHNSTONE objefled to the motion, as lie was of opinion a sufficient censure had already been expressed by the vote they'had just given, and that it would be better to prevent such occuriences ter the time so come, by a Bill, than to censure what bad already passed by. He hoped the Bill to.be brought in would provide that greater securitieq, and More proportionate to the trust,. shopld be given.— Securities to the amount of 10,0061. bore no:pro portion to trust confided _to the ,Sectetary4l she Osdnance. • - ) Mr. WHITBREAD perceived the - Hon. Gentleman opposite had got his friends into ehe House ) , and was now endeavouring, to, get them out of it. The case that had been adduced as similar to that before them lie contended was not a parallel case. _After, the defiance of his Hon. Friend, if .proofs Of the faCt were not broughc forward with him that statement would obtain no credit. After voting that a Publie Board had been guilty of a breach of their duty, lie. hoped there would not be found even a small majo rity in a.thin House to leave the punisliMent of the. offence to a Bill for preventing its recurrence. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, he had stated that in point of strii:Aness,the Board was responsible, but that the greater blame, attached ,itself to another quaff ter. H e thou g ht they ought„:` not to proceed farther, and wo4ld - therefore move the previous . question, • Mr. H. THORNTON remarked,' that as the House were careful bow they bestowed their p6ise, they ought also to be sparing of their censure. He, thought the censure proposed a little too harsh, yet he was far from wishing the sentence' should be the reverse of that 'proposed. He did not exa6tly apkoflifof the previous question ; be would rather the motion' should have been withdrawn. Under all the circum stances lie should give theprevious question his sup port. A division took place, when the numbers were-- For the - previous question - - - 54 Against it - - - - . 18 Sir G. WAIIRENDER gave. notice of a motion for a . Correspondence between Mr. Davison and the Secretary of the'Board of Ordnanee, relating to the duty of the Treasurer of the Ortinance.; MR. BATHURST'S INSTRUCTIONS. Mr: WHITBREAD thought the House should be put in possession of the instru&ions given to Mr. Bathurst and Mr. Stewart, As he could not anti cipate, the objections that might be made to their produAion,. he would not take . up the time of the ,House, but content himself with moving-- " That an humble Addrets be presented to his iViajcsty, praying that bewould be graciously pleased to order the. in structions given to Mr. Bathurst, Mr. Stewart ; or• any other person apportired to communicate with the Court of Vienna, touching the' nature of the hostilities between Austria and Prance." • - • • The CHANCELLOR of the.EXCREQUER observed , 'it was not cornmon.to move tor - sac() ihstruaiwis• l'hose it) question could not be prodhced -with- I.()tPON : P rowed by RICHARD HA i( R S r ol No. 4, Marslet.t.coi!t, I.(7w::street . ; and 1-1 the SUN-OFFICE, No. It?, Straad, where Advertisements, Orders , , -k i 1 . 7- On Saturday afternoon a . rdostdistregsing and —... , me lancholy accident ,happened` at,ea, - near Hartley, by Which ndleSs than 23 seamen and fiAtertnenitavo osttheir'lives. In the mor n i n g of that 'day sever 4. fishing beats had gone to sea, when. a storm after wards arose from the eastward, and the perilous si tuation-of the (.;i6ws being seen by the spe&tatOrs.oal shore, they hastened to' Blyth 'for the lifetiOt, ~ which was with wonderful expedition soon brotOt to the scene of danger. A crew of brave sea Me g, ', : ; I instantly volntiteerecitind manned the life-boat, who ''.; Speedily rescued the fisherthen, by getting them s af;! , on board; and their' numerous relative's, who were assembled do the shore, already 'congratulated each other on the speedy ,deliverance oPtheir friends.. -- ' Alas ! however, •when almost within hail of Land, the life-boat was driven by a heavy sea . Upcm a ridge a- rockS, called Hartley Bates, and sitch .'was 1 11 0 tremendous surge, that she almost' instantly -,wen t to pieces,. an&litucitholti erc..4s:v '(75 in rittinbet) 6 . 1, cept two, perished in sight of hundreds of speetl; 'tors. Those two saved were, a foreighe47 and a set man; Thiinfas Lee, 13::lettigir.g. to Hanky. A yotPg .! man of't he name or Brown, sustained himself 900( 1 apiece of rock for some time, but was at .;e o ` lll washed off by the surge. Among the sufferers were a fatherand four'sOnS, of the name of' Atlustrotl! two brothers di' the name of 'Shor, sbelenging £0 Blyth, and other two brothers of the "same name, belonging to Cullercoates i- but many of them haVe, ;eft large families-to lam en t their losi.• Tit k; scene of distress upon the beach, which this disastrous oc , cUrrence iiceasioned, exceedS all descriptieo fur it; extreiriehorror. Most of the b o di es - h av 6 ' been al ready washed on sh ore . . 3';11.1 - A 40%.). .6RAVSSEND, APRIL Sailed—the Suffolk; —, from Ma• tinique Catlierine , Tate, Mary, Sarmon, .and Maria, 'Gunter, ; J" d the John of Gaunt, Moor, for lierhadoes.. • Mr. WHITBREAD, as the fate-of Austria was de cided, could see no improp,riety in letting other nations know what exertions we had made in her cause. He did not wish for such disclosures ass would hazard-the lives of others. He was sorry it had not &en proVe - d, that we . were in no way the causeof the war. He did not wish to press his motion; he would, therefore, . withdraw it, leaving his Hon. Friend, who intend ed twking a mo;itari on the subject, to shape his M 0... I lion as he pleased. He was not, howeier, satisfied, as he thought. Ministers refused‘what, with proper limitations, might have been consistently granted. Mr. BROUGHAM 'then gave notice, that on Tues day he , would move for the prodtidion of such papers as could be granted without detriment to the public) Service, or injury to others. - . The Privately Stealing Bill went through a Com mittee, as did the Dweliing4ionse and Canal Rob bery Bills, the reports of which were ordered to be . received on Tuesday. , d . On a Fr e id d ay fo l , ast, at Clifton, after an Illness of onl.' s '.' e .. . DIED. Mr. RYDER moved thethird reading of the Local Militia Bill. After a few•words from Mr. C. W. youngest aYs son 0 1 ;( 3 :f 71 al t i tt t :t u af e i n s ths ' Wynne and Mr. Ryder, the Bill was read a third' On m onday last, at her house in g. Odiham, Mrs. Payne, e a a t r l o li f s hisagc. 'C , - 11. I Fra ncis pag O e n , S E ‘ s i g nd . a relid of the late (Win Payne, Esq. of Dodds,- Barnacloes. Lukin Horatio, Inc time and passed. i y n the mo I . s n 9 i n t h g ' y house, ars a ton, The Militia Completion. Bill was read a third' time, and passed. . . On Tuesday last, Robert Maitland, Esq. of Greenwich. late a Merchant in C o le man street. The further consideration of the Report of the Lately, Richard Meyrick Da) rell, son of Richard PaY" Irish Einbeza•lement Bill was postponed to Monday. ; tell, Esq. of Lillingstone Dayrell, Bucks. The Etst India Commissioners Bill was read a• • On the 6th ult. at the advanced age of 1 2i Ye irs, Sarah. Second otherwise Sleuion, of Clciskilt, in the Parish° f second time, and ordered to be' referred to a Secret Drumgoolm, near Rilthfrylanci. Shi was the life in dit*reo 4 Committee. . • ' leases taken out about • the year 1694, at about is. 6 ,1 • P c ` . Mr. .14 , iflINGTON brought up certain Papers re- acre. lacing to the abolition of i he Slave Trade.—Ordered to be printed. _ . ,Mr. .LustrizsuTox brought up the Report of the Innkeepers' Allowances Bill, w Men was agreed to, and the Bill ordered to be etig - r ssed, and read a third time to-morrow. PR IC ft . ul ,IT ()CA.'S YESTLIt DA Y. Bank Stock, 269 i lndia Stocat, 187 186 3 Navy g per Cent. 99 a India Bonds : , zos. 19s. pr . n ' r Irish 5 per Cent. E xc h equer -Bills, 9s. i4s. r.° ] 4 per Cent. 83 4 4 ' 844 84 0 innitinr, 3, per Cent. Red, 68i it- linperial 3 per Cent. 3 per Cent. Cons. 69 -i 111 . CORS. for Account, 7o 1 7 - '1 Bank L. Ann. iS 5- [funs i t . ' Mr. LUSIIING'TON brcuglit up certain Papers re.; lative to the state ofhulhoo.—Orden:d to be referred to the Corntnittee.---Ladjourned. 'TO Titonlits Y Lai. No.y, New BridgoStreet, Lolvinn OLD BAILEY. Honoured Sir, . ; • Edinburgh, Much 18, 1 80 t• IBEG leave to inform you, .that 7 ever s ince the year 1790, I have beeu alllided with the Lues Veil rea ; which, from its obstinately resisting : every course ° Medicine prescribed by the • most eminent of die. I-Tacul t ! here, and undergbuig several severe. courses :of s a liv`...ri"r' and twice diScharged atom the Hospital, w i t h lit t l e reii° e ; would appear to he of the most inveterat e nature , in Li' spring of last yerfr my - disorder had got to suCli' a heel, a s nearly to plat a period to my existence—l had a large race''i ,on the crown of my head,,one oil each iirrri, and iny le; were broke out in a Thghtfol manner ; my right 11/35 di Caa ; fully painful, acid had . been in a state of ulc e r a ti o n for ,!... last seven years ; , m-v left had also two lar g e no des co . ,'" was very much discoloured, and gave rue such exert/v- 1 " ing pain, particularly when *arm in bed, as nearly to dc' pnve me of rest : ; in this 'lamentable state, 1' was recoil): mended by Mr. I. Thompson, (who received so great ' 3 cure: by them here), to take your leake's Patent l'ili c s e l which I began to da on die 26th of 'May ; i n t he colts , of ,a-fortnight, I began to receive benefit—in little W l ' ' w e than a month, the ulcers on my he?d and • arms A , c 7o L a soundly healed---soon •after, the sores on , my. legs. lielA c • also ; leaving, however, consaterable discolour at i o n in ''' „c skin, and pain in the bone of the left, which, by the 13 1 e' sing of God, and a- little longer perseverance in your nil: lira* Medicine, subsided ; the nodes dispersin B , the sii ,- . 6 7, regaining its natural hue, and the nodurnal pains .graclitajt!„ going off.' I thus became, by your liberal advice and Pa' dicine, perfedly free from all my 1 former complaints' have recovered my former spirits and strength, - and am i 3; come jolly and fat, in which state navingeontinued rnai l i t months to the astonishment of all wh o knew me, I all' a , a loss in what terms to express my gratit u d e , b u t beg P...,; for the good of other suffering mortal s , to ma k e this , ''.,, , case as public as posSible, as I shall on ever y occasiT in so-doing, you, will greatly( oblige, Sir, y ou r gr_at e-t ,, L/ ' obedient, very humble servant, . ALEX. MU 1 4 . 1 ` , -E' • Swan's Close, High-street, Edinburgh. • Witnesses to the above Cure foliN THOIAP SON, No. 3, New - Poultry. Market - 4 114 i oust M.INTO SH , Old Assembly-Close, Edinburgh. , Prepared and Sold by the sole Propriefor, Timm A s T. - . Y LQzt, iVlember of the Royal College 'of sti r ' ; };cons, at his House, No. 9, New Brillge-etreet, London! • where, after a constant residence of mere t,han thirty-s"•; : years, in a practice particularly dire led to the cure ° I Venereal Complaints and th os e in c ide n t a l to the Pacts ( 7 t i • Genel - ation, with that invi o l a bl e . sec r ec y w hich men ," g: ; 17 his profession shoUld a lW a y s o b serve i n suc h cases, '1- hatters• himself, the advice and assistance he gratuitou sl y . ~ administers to . persons taking - this Medicine.,, will ire este , iirif , d, by, a discerniog. Public, as an 'adva.ntag'ese- y doin Attainable and void of all ambiguity. Also sold, by his appointment, tor the ceinvenience PI those living.at a distance, at the Perfumer's, No. 35 , - St ; Alban's-Street, Pall-Mill '; th e - Toyshiop, - No. ic3r .."'''' otil-street ;, Mr. Disborough's, No. 7, Fish-street-h ills Mr. Steel's, Bookseller, No. t, Union-row, Little TP‘ i l er- • hill ; Mr. Baxter's, South-bridge, Edinburgh; Mr. 4 1 , 3,- ; rdonald, Glasgow ; Mr. Bull, Dame-street, bublinf ant‘' -a out pers-n in.every considerable toWn in' Great britainaPti Ireland, in Boxes of only . as._ 9d. each, sealed u 7 ,, 'xith fu and plain "directions, whereby„ : persons or either sex 1114 1 cure themselves with ease; -speed, Secrecy; and safety.. a, N ..li. Every Box so ld i n 't; teat Britain is Sealed up W 4 1 a• Stamp, on•which, by fav ou r o f- the O ta mmissionerS . l o , i, n.,,,, at the Stamp Office—" - T. Taylor, No, 9i..' l ",: i g _ . oritiKe..,:treet,"--to imitate which is Falony, and all OP— , ar.: C'lmi taking. APRIL 12. The occurrences of thii day, in general, were very , unimpoi (ant ; that which most excited the attention' of the Court was. the trial of Samuel Luvetrae, for stealing privately from Omrang .osusan Tagg . (a Russian sailor boy), a number of dollars and other . coins to the value of 171. The case, through the' medium of an interpreter, was fully proved, and. the prisoner was fund Guilty. James Carey was mditted for robbing his master, Wm..-Noble„.. Esq. of plate and other articles to-the value of '‘,.-From the ,evidence oP the prosecutor, it appeared that the prisoner, who was his servant, had the-care pf his plate ; that he had lived, with him two years and five months ; that on the 25th of February last . he decaniped without his_ wages whi&h were due,• and that in ten cloys after he was apprehended in Bath, where he had applied for a place at Lord Blaney's, . where he was • apprehended. These cir cumstpces were proved, and he: was found Guilty. • STAGE COACH as.—The .Bill now before Parlia ment for repealing .the Stage Coach Ads and subs stituting other regulations, enacts, that a stage coach with four or more horses•shall nor carry more than ten outside passengers, one of. them on the coach-box,;three in the front of the roof, and the remaining six behind. None of them to be - al, lowed to sit en the luggage. Stage coaches with two or three horses to have not more than four outside passengers, Long coaches or double-bodied coaches, to carry in all not mire than sixteen pas sengers, including the guard. No child under severi years of age to be counted as a paSsenger, but if more than one, two of theM to be considered equal to one grown person. Na coach, the top being more than 8 feet 9 inches from the ground, to carry outside passengers or luggage in the boot. No lug gage to be carried on the roofs exceeding tt wo feet in height. Owners-of stage coaches to be liable' to penalties, if the drivers cannot be tound--snitt trions left with the book-keeper to, be good ser :vice-drlvers incapable of driving from intoxication to be committed--,penalty 01'51. on them for leav ing their horses. Toll-collealor` to count_ the pas.- sengers and measure the height of the luggage, if reqiiireA—petialtics recoverable before any Jusiice. of the Peace. A guard firing.plf, his arms, exempt . for defence, to forteit 51. Stage coaches only carry . • 'inFluggage in the front 1).4 Orbux benincl, to be allowed to carry two addnioikai passengers. _ . I Publish , el by, WI LLI AM A RMI GER SCRIPPS, South Alp4im.street, C lOF yen°, tquar. `Or the aper, Letters for the Editor, &c, t . postlaja),,a,l9P be addressed. out disclOihri ereumstances inconsistent with the interests of that Court which they concerned. No initruClions had heen given to Mr. Stdvkart. Mr. CANNING agreed in the - propriety of the ob jestion of his NIA' lion. Friend: "If they could be produced, the objeft of the HOii: Gentleman Wonjd, not he answered, as Mr. Bathurst did not-read Trieste till the beginning of - April, and, aidpoi ar ri've at Vienna before the:26th. The Very firstlet ter he' sent gave an 'account of hostilities, which, breaking out before his arrival, could nothave been influenced by his . instruaions.. It was thought ad visable-to have a British Minister near at' hand, to Communicate with Austria in the then state of the Continent. Mr. Bathurst, was in consequence sent to Malt r, to be near ; but care was taken not - to intrude a British Agent on Austria, as-it was appre hended the consequences might be•injurious- to her cause. The Hun. Gentleman would learn from his motion that Mr. Bathnist's instruaions had had no effea on the war, as it was iiot known. at Vienna that he was on • his ,way to that city till after the commencement of. hostilities.. He had only one other point to urge, - namely, that' of the state of Europe fbr the two or three months preViOus to the Austrian war ; when considered, it might easily be conceived; • not only that the secrets of . Austria, but that those ot- other Courts must be diScrosed by the pro ludion of,the papers ; and as' the lives and, in terests of:lopy individuals,. bearing 'a sbare in the councils of foreign nations, might be' - endankered , , he hoped.the Hon. Gentlewan would not press-his motion. Mr. BROUGHAM said; if the papers moved for were not granted, he- would . ' on ah eatiy day move for copies of all such communication~` from those two Gen'ilernety .(Mt.'ssis. Bathurst and Siew'art) to Ministers, while on .their way to Vienna, as could be produced without ch-triment to the public service, &c. - • - . f/R 11,8. On TusdaY the - 3d InSt. at Wrethatn•Hall, Norf Kinnaird, of a Daughter. On-the Bth in•st: at Wrottesley, the Lady of Sir J Wrottesley, of a Son. . . Yesterday se'nnight, at Glasbtiry, the - Rev. F. H. /Wen dick, A.M of Trinity College, Oxtbrd, to Bridger Atinc• ?, youpgest daughtei. o f t h e late Thomas IVilliams, Lsq• ° I . 3re.c;nshire. • Yesterday morning, at St. George's Church, Bloomsbury% fames Lyon, Esq. of .tea.ienliall-stret, to Miss lkin, 01 Wobutn-plac:.e r kussel 1: square. The same day, at St. George the Martyr, Qtteen.squarr the Ref. Edward William Grintield, A M. of Co - lege, Oxford, - to Mary Ann, only surviving child - of the late George Fillingham, Esq. of Upper Seymour.ureet, f'° lt° man-square. On the ad inst. at' Si.' Maiy-le:Straittl,' Mr. Brown, of Doncster, to Miss Cord, Vocal Performer. f 1 , , \V hi, I , " 4 "t 4, A t 1‘„0