The Sun. — London, England, 1809-12-05 00:00:00

L4JV REPORT. Of, CO:IRT CFSIN.G's BENCH, Dim, 2. IITTIN . GS . 10STOlti LORD TeCINBOROiIaIi IN WEST. MINSTLR.HALL. THE KING U. EDTILTND GRIFFITHS, ESQ. Mr. BURROUGHS Opened the pleadings. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL opened the case,which was that of an indictment against the defendant, stating that an anion hancen brought by Jeremiah Donovan, Esq. against Mr. Massiter, a haulier, at Wincanton, in the county of Somerset, in which there was a verdid for the Defendant, and that the costs had been taxcd,and an execution issued against the goods of Mr. Donovan, for 1261. being the• amount of such costs. That the present defendant Mr, tit - id - 1;11s, was attorney for Mr. Daum an, and, on , the occasion of the - above .execu tion - entering the house of Mr. Donovan, ,Mr. Griffiths write to Mr. Massiter a letter; which re fleeted greatly on the character of that gentleman, and which • letter had a dired tendency to a breach of the peace, and which was, therefore, a libel. The letter was dated " Cnarles,streeta St. James'squarea 2d June, 1809,". direded to Mr. Massiter; and was nearly as follows : Sir—Yourself and Donovan.--I received a note from.my agent half an hour , ago, saying, that these costs were taxed last night, and I instantly sent a check for the money, by a person, -desiring him to pay your agent ; but, to my great surprise, a sheriff's officer has this moment brought in au eaecntion to Mr. Donovan's house for these costs.. This condua is so atrocious, that I should not have conceived it possible that you would have been guilty of an at which would disgrace the most pettifogging practi tioner in the profession. I certainly shall tell every man, and in every company wherein your name is mentioned, the-rascality of your conduct. You are a blackguard, capable of every dirty and cowardly salon, and you have not one pretension to the cha racter of a gentleman." This letter being read. by the ATTORNEY-GE NERAL, Mr. Gianowproposed to make an apology for thealefeedant, and to acknowlege his error, 'Which be offered, not from himself, for that he would never do for any client, but for his client, who was sin cerely sorry for ,his error, and trusted that the pica secutor would accept this apology as the best atone ment Which the defendant could make, and the only genuine satisfaction which a gentleman could re ceive after his spirit had been wounded. He ad mitted that the 'eatr was such as one gentleman should nol have sent to another. The language was coarse and indefensible ; the defendant was sorry lor it. He was a young gentleman of perfectly fair . chara&er, was the - prosecutor's neighbour - , had no in-will towards him, and wished harmony to he restored between their. ,Next •to being in the right was to confess ourselves in the wrong; and mankind thought the better of a man, who knew how to forgive another for an insult, when he made him a sincere and public apology. He hoped the prosecutor would accept of this, and that the proceedings would be at an end. The defendant- might be found-guilty, pro form, under an understanding that he was not to be brought up for judgment. The ATTottNtY-.Ggr:EriAL seemed to be very much inclined to this course being taken. Lord Eetavamtounti strongly recommended it, for it would certainly be an inconvenient thing to a young man in the profession to be brought up for the judgment of the Court in such a case as this; it Would be blazoned forth to the public,, and would attract notice to a thing which it was the defendant's interest to have buried in oblivion as soon as pos sible ; he mentioned this , the rather, on account of the nature of the case, for, however he _might feel for the irritation under which the defendant might have acted, or for his sub Sequent regret, yet the Court, if it had pronounced judgment on the sub j::, must advert to the nature 'of the offence, and must pronounce such a 'judgment as may deter others from. the like ; for it was not to be endured, that those who only did that which they were at lowed to do by law, should be traduced and vilified for so doings The prosecutor, who was in Court, left the AT TORNEY-GENERAL no power to exercise his 'discre tion ; the apology was not accepted, and the cause proceeded. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL opened the case, the circumstances of which are shortly these. An aai'on bad been brought by Mr. Donovan against, Mr. Massiter, in which Mr. Donovarawas unsuccessful. He moved the Court for a new trial ; was unsuc cessful in that application. - Costs were taxed. Mr. Griffiths was . Mr. Donovan's attorney in that cause. Notice was also givep of the taxing of coats.. Mr. Griffiths' agent did not attend, costs • were therefore regularly taxed ex parte.—Notice was also given, that unless the money was paid on the following day, an execution would issue against the goods of Mr. Donavan. The money was not paid, the execution issued, upon which the above indefensible letter was sent by Mr. Griffiths to Mr. Massiter, upon which was founded this prosecution. These -fads were proved by Mr. Dine, the agent -Of Mr.- Messner, by whose evidence it ap peared that he is a banker at Wincanton, in Somersetshire, has reaieed there all his life, -as did his father. That Mr. Griffiths is the. son of a barrister, and bas a banking-house in the same place, in partnership with Mr. Donovan. It ap peared further on cross-examination, that after the finding of this indictment, the defendant had been' held to- bail, and the proceedings on the arrest were carried on in a manner which was not distinguised by lenity. Mr. GARROW addressed the Jury, not with the hope of obtaining a verdict,' but with a view of *hewing how sincere the Defendant was in his sor- - raw for what had, , happened, and of sheaving that' fie aded under the influence of a sudden passion, / created by what indeed it was legal for the Prosecutor to do, but which he thought was superfluously done; for the nioney was ready on the instant, as appear , ed by tlieletter which was the subject of this prose-' cutiona He had not yet lost the hope that this apo logy would be accepted by Mr. Massiter, whose good ht,rotxr he understood to keep pace with his perfed resveclability.. in appeared in evidence, that the Defendant had bunted over the Plaintiff's land on 'the Ist of April last, being Easter Eve ; that he was then his own huntsman, and was followed by about twenty horse men, and that the damages they did was about as much. as the Plaint', I's bailiff estimated, in reality, at about 40s. but said that he would not.have bad it done for ten times that amount. That the Defend ant had actually .bought foxes, when cubs; 'had reared them, and caused holes to be dug for them, and then let them loose, &c: but there was no evi dence of his having , gone through: the ceremony of a_ mock-sale of his hunters, &c. nor of • any thing to manifest his intention to persist in this practice, to the annoyance of his neighbours 3 do the contrary, Mr. Marryatt, his Counsel; declared his :client's in .te.ntion to be, implicitly to submit to the' law as laid: down by Lord .Ellenborough at the trial at Hert ford, whiCh was, :that he - had no right` to go on the land of another in pursuit of a fox, or .any thing else, after he had notice not to trespass: there ; he had misunderstood the law; - .and that naiSr.u,ler7 Several - transports from Walcheren, with about 500 sick, arrived at Portsmouth on,Friday, but they have so far recovered on their passage, that few of thein required to be sent, to the hospitals. left Flushing on Tuesday last , when every Oing Was. 4euly to' low up the fortifications. .Allitost,all die regiments wereembarked. . 10 ( *a ) N 3 Printed by RICHARD HARRIS, of No. 4, Dildrtlett-coutt, Dow-street ; 'and Published by WI Li ItlM A RMIG ER SCRIPPS, South Molon.street, G oFvctic • At the. SUN-OFFICE, No, 112, Strand; whexe lidvottisetrients, Orders fur the Pap,47., Letters for the t;ditor, &c. (pint-14a), must In address.l. Lord ELLENBOROUGH observed tos the Jury, that the only qUestion which' be could put to them was, " Whether they thought the letter in question had a tendency to a breach of the peace ?" a point which, he presumed, they would find no difficulty in deciding ; if in the affirmative they would find the defendant guilty. Whether he should be brought up for .. ipdgment, must rest with the prosecutor; and irte was, it would be for the Court tb eonsi: der how the case should be disposed of, ,with a due consideration to the whole of its cireurnstanc‘s. aihe Jury found the defendant guilty. ihansort, quildm v. FLOWER. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL stated this to he an ac tion brought to recover the penalty of 401. which he contended the defendant , had incurred under the . provisions of the Statute of the 29th of the present King, c. 26, commonly called the Hawkers.:and Pedlars Aa and' it was for lending out for hire a license granted to the defendant, to another person who had no such license. _ It appeared in 'evidence, that the defendant is a dealer in-coals, and that he employs a person of the name of Warby to go about with coals in a cart, and to retail them in the streets, for which he gave this person 4s. 6d. per chaldron up/+i coals sold : that the coals were the ploperty of the defendant, and that this servant of his had uo other interest in them than the wages he thus received for selling them; and therefore, - Lord ELLtiNDOROUGH, after hearing - the whole of the case, was clearly of opinion, that without de ciding the point of whether or not this license was personal, and could not be delegated, this case was not aletting out of the license for hire, and there fore not within the meaning of the Statute. Verdia for the defendant. RIDGE V. CAPEL. The-ATTo a,NEv-G ENEII AL stated this to be 'an ac tion of trespass, brought by Mr. Ridge; against the Revetend and the Honourable Wilhain Cape', who. is bpther to a Nob;e Lord, for a: trespass com mitted by him on the land of the plaintiff, - by run ning over it, together with 150 other horsemen, With hounds, &c. in purSuit of foxes, by Which they had trampled upon, and torn up the surface of the plaintiff's land, and threatened absolute destruc io it. Tl.is subject h,;(1 been before my Lord Et lenhorough at the List assizes i for the county' of Hertford ; and his Lordship had laid do wn did law, by whiel the defendant had promised .16 ahide. The substance of the ; "matter , was shortly this :--:- The Reverend and Honourable • defendant bad suc 'ceeded to the rights of what was called the Berkeley Hunt, which, while 'enjoyed by the . late Lord Berkeley, was of no annoyauce to any body ; but since his departure, a society of gentle- Men was formed, for the purpose of pursuing , the pleasures of the fox-chace, and they supported their proceedings by subscription, at the head of which ..yas this Rev, and Hon. Defendant. They had gone so far as to insist upon their right to pursue a fox whithersoever he Might lead them; even to the ab solute destruction of the property of individuals, over their hedges,' or pales, or railings ; prostrating.tbeir .mcadoVs; lawns, pleasure-grounds, or gardens, and that to such an exrent, as to threaten to lay abso lutely waste the whole land in the neighboUrnood of . this metropolis, from Uxbridge to Hampstead and to Highgate. They had notice not to trespass any further on the land of Mr. Ridge, who is a very con siderable proprietor of land in the neighbourhood of thanidge. This was totally disregarded by the De fendant, who was disposed still to continue the prac tice of fox-bunting over the Plaintiff's grounds and insisted on' his right to do so. 1:3,14.ni which an ac tion was brought against him, and the plea Was, " That this was done in pursuit of that hurtful de. strudive animal, beast of prey, and vermin, called a fox; and for the destrMition of that animal, as it was lawful for him to do." The cause carne on before my Lord ELLENBo. ROUGH, at the last assizes for Hertford, when his Lordship held that this plea was insupportable, and a verdict was found for the plaintiff, with nominal damages, the defendant entering into an under taking to discontinue the practice, but which he was so far from doing, that he went through a mock sale of his hunting-horses at Tattersars, which horses were now returned to the same place as . be fore, had the same riders for the,n, had the same hounds to follow, and all the parties were preparing for the same sport, in utter defiance of the law, to the utter ruin of the property of all these who were owners of land within the limits of this scene Berkeley Hunt, comprehending the whole country around this mighty metropolis, from Uxbridge to Hampstead and Highgate. To check this 'practice was the object of this action, which object could never be attained, except by exemplary damages. This cause had been once -considered as a writ of Inquiry, to assess the damages which the plaintiff had sustained, the defendant having undertaken, at the trial at Hertford, not to persist in the practice; but the plea had not been withdrawn ; a fact which manifested the def'endant's ititentiou4o continue the practice by, .violence, in defiance of law, and no thing could restrain him but exemplary damages; for he had bought foxes when cubs; had reared 1 them ; bad caused holes to be dug: for them, and and had declared his determination to persist in this amusement to himself, to the absiiute ruin of his neighbour's land. standing was general, from v4rit the Judges lad said in a fox-hunting cause, in the year's 807, by which it bad been held,' that a hunter may pursue a fox over the land of another, provided it be started, on the ground of a third person ;- but.now , the law was understood to be otherwise, and The defendant, although as fond. of the chace•as any body, would no mbre offend the law in the pursuit of it than any of the King's . subjeets. - He_ maintained that this Case _had been greatly magnified and exaggerated to the part of-the plaintiff. Lord ELLEISBOROUGg obstrved, that' his was . ritt4 a mere inquiry of damages, although the Defendant having suffered to stand, his plea of justification, say- ing. that he did this in order io.destroy. that beast of prey andclestruatva animal, called the fox, he hxd left it open to the other side to give general evidence of intention ; and, to, be sure, there was nothing more ridiculous than to say .that his Pursuit was the destrudion of an animal which he reared. As to the law, there certainly had been a misconception; for it was thought, that if a fox was started upon the land of one person, the bunter might lawfully pur sue it over the laud of another, notwithstanding no tice that he should not.. That was not contended to be the law in the pursuit of a hare. It was no more the law in pursuit of a fox than that of a hare; and the law was now settled, that nobody,shall• be at liberty to go over the ground of another, without his leave, in any hunting pursuit whatever. The Jury had now only to consider the damages. Verdict for the I . laintiff—Damages tot. . I%jONDAY, DEC. 4. WATTS V. FERMOR. This . was an a&ion against the defendant for the 1 negligence of his servant. in driving his barouche against the plaintiff's gig, overturning it, and wound ing the Plaintiff. It appeared - by the evidence, • that the plaintiff was a stable-keeper in town, who, in company tritira friend, went to the last. Eporn races in a single horse-chaise.' l'he defendant was a man of large ,fottune, who was also in his barouche and four. On their way home, the plain tiff' and his gip-was going quietly up the hill, in the middle of the road, when the 'defendant's and Lord Sefton's barouche came along at the rate of 12 or 14 Miles an hour. Lord Sefton's barouche passed the plaintiff, and by the evidence of a gentleman's ser vant, who was standing on his master's garden-wall„ there was: plenty of room for the defendant's car riage to have passed. .But the coachman thought proper to come sonear that the hind wheel of the barouche caught the gig, and over-turned it. The plaintiff and his friend were, of course, both thrown on the ground,• and the plaintiff was cut du the leg, and had - a severe contusion on the head. • Mr. Robinson, a surgeon, in the neighbourhood, said, that he considered the injury he received so very 'serious, that he felt it necessary to call in the assistance of Mm. Heaviside, the surgeon. It was a considerable time before, the ptaintitf recovered suf ficient health to enable him to go to Brighton, where he still remained labouring under the Weds of the accident. . For the defendant, the coachman, the butler, and the postillion of Mr. Fermor, were called, who all endeavoured to represent the accident as occasioned by plaintiff himself ; they stated, that the plaintiff, as the barouche was passing, drove his 'horse that way, as. they believed: with a view to upset - them, and that in fad he had nearly done it. They also represented the plaintitras being drunk when he was on the ground. It was however proved, that he and his friend had drank but one bottle of home brewed ale, which they carried with them, and a bottle of Sherry between them and others, and that he was really. stupid. at the .time, from the blow which be har. received on the head. Mr. GARROW inade a most able reply, and com mented with severity on the condua of the Defen dant's witnesses, who, he said, had aetually been guilty, of perjury, to shelter their master from .the consequences of. their own iniscondnO. The Jury found for the plaintiff, damages 400 L . EVANS V. 11U.NTER. This was a qui taro a etioiz on tie statute of Queen Elizabeth, to. recover penahie t i v against the Defen. dant, a carpenter, for employing a journeyman who had not served seven yeari apprenticeship. It was proved by two of his workmen; that he employed a country lad for 16 months, who had never served an apprenticeship. The Jury found for the Plaintiff, dainages 40s, per month, which is the penalty of the statute. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DEC:4. 1101,TZAPFVEL V. SMITH AND OTHERS. This was an ation to recoverthe sum of 430. for a machine made for the defendants. The ,plaintiff is an engine-maker, and . defendants brush-makers. The question in the case was, whether the sum of 3101. paid into Court, was a sufficient remuneration for the plaintiff's work and labour. The small sup ply of hog's bristles (used in making brushes) from foreign parts, induced the defendants to hit upon a a substitute to make np for the loss. Accordingly, whalebone cut and split was to be the substitute, and the plaintiff was applied to, and direaed,to construct a machine for cutting and splitting the whalebone. It was .stated that the estimated expence should not exceed fe;2ol. The charge•now made was .the sum above stated, to which was• added a charge of 651. for a roller. To prove the reasonableness of this demand, a great number of witnesses were exa mined; .their testimony in general went to establish the f4i of the machine being so construed as to perform more work than originally, agreed for in a shorter space of time, and consequently that it was Made at a greater expellee. After a long trial, which occupied nearly the whole of the . (ray, the Jury (which was special) retired, and having been chit • some time . , returned a verdid for the Plaintiff .with 471. and costs. SAW NEXS. 41/IAV 'LUND, DECEMBER .14 , Tri•• Arrived-=the Catherine, Lampire, from Cmyrni; eThiftier; . l"uckman, from fatnatca; Venerabre, Dye•.lral—, Queliec; iaires(a Prize), Brawn , and. L u re s tairs, BaYri, ° " from;Cadit ; Nelly, Smith, and Ellen, Napier, from Pd3ri: tiniqt,e; Patriot, Foster, and Glasgow, Martin , t iom ta ; Venus, Starling, from Rio ',weir(); Baltic, Thorrir 'son, from St. ; Lord 'Nelson, Hall, from Sc''l l n j Fantc, Hailer, from Flushing ; North Soil, PRikS °n ' E e lo.nce, from Lisbon ; and the T • h are, frtAl l Uo'rk. Sailed—the Tames, Postlethwaite, for Jamaica ,• Sarnuc , ! Sughrue, and Harry, Red(rta77, for Trinidad — Blenh?' ll4 Miller, for Grermia ' • Hebe, Brown, foi Denierara ;- Ches ter, Neild, and the Success, Emery, for Dublin. BIRrHs. •• On the ifith ult. at Clapham Common, the Lady 4 1 4 a 4 " liam Moffat, Esq. of a Daughter. On Thursday list; in Hereford-street, the Lady of JesaP , Smith, Esq. of a Sun.. Oh Saturday Morning,' in Hill street, Berkeley-s%uarei the Right fibh. Lady Foley, of a Daughter. MARR . IED.. Oa SatUrrlay, tt. Helen's, I3ishopsgate, Tho. Ileck ert• Esq. late of the Ist Regiment of Guards,• to Miss , lam e daughter of Thomas fames, Esq. of Browning's, Essex• The same day, lohri Henry Brune', Esq. of Queen-s trec ' v eheapside, to Catharine, youngest daughter D 1 Mr. John Houseman, of T hreadneed Ie- street. r taut On the 24- inst. at St. George's, BluortssburY , George Fead, of the Ist Guards, to Miss Carolin e Hallifa. 's* fourth daughter of the Rev. Robert I lallifax, Vi c a r of an' dish. Last week, Mr HAsseff, ef the Strand, to Miss M.c'qc". per, of the City-road.. - • anLately, at Brampton, inn Cumberland, Richard Ho d g s° Esq. of Nlhouse-liall, near Carlisle, a Major in the 1-01;r: Last lndi a .Cc.npany' service on the Bengal F. stabl to Miss Hetherington, only tkughter of the late johtt' therington, Esq. of Intuit, near iir.rinpt , n. ___.:.•••••••4" DIE,D . ot.: a— On the 23d ult. at Shelford, near Cambridge; the. inf a n! son of Brigadier-General A. Campbell. ~ , 4 On Tuesday the 2Sth ult. Mrs. Ann Axe;'ged 71, 7 1 '' or Birchin-lane.- ~ . . . . On th. - 4 :,otn ult. Mrs. fvlul;cr, of the •Parakotv, ,nl4cl( ' heath, in the 74th year of her age. ~c r On Wetiti.rsday morning, at Stamford, Mrs. Carr. riot..i of the Rev. R , i, L. •C'art,_ MO. Prebendary of the C‘tthe: i r Church of St; Paul, and Rector of the inaited.Pai - ilthe , of sr, Andrew. Undershaft and St. Nlaiy-at-Axe; London, .incl 3 1 s e ' Rector of St. Mary's, Finchley,.in the County bi . Middle.- Sex. . . On Friday morning" last, Annitte, and on SCinda'y 111Erv r :, ing, Olive, twin daughters of Ralph.Bernal, Esq• of BeP nard-street, Russell-square. d IL'" On Sunday last, lohn Jackson, q• of " a.. 1 ot .t'•t- En r ham. ne; Lately, at Tenby, in South Wales, Jahn T-ienry Cochr",,e.: . Esq. one_of the Commissioners of the Custdins !or ' land. . . ~ftri On Friday se'nnight, at Newport, in the Isle or i . ;7 i er after a long and roost painful illness, Mr. Shatford, I,cii,iiti of the Theatres in Salisbury, BlandlOrd, the:lsles 01 ' . jersey, ke. PRICE 0 'VEST E Bank Stock, t • Navv 5 per Cent. toil ( toz 4 per Cent. 84i $4 k 3, per Ccnt. Red. 69 1. ; per Ct. Cons. 69 70 691 i ISank L. Aun. IS 9-t6thst STOCKS ItDAY. India Stock, India Bonds, 245.-pr; e • E xc h. Rills p.Cent s. P. I m p e rial 3 per Cent. Ditto Ann. Cons. for Opening, 70'f- LONDON .mmuctTs, etc. 1' IN MARK.LANE 3 ,ALPAS, Meal Weiglivrst Nov. 23, to Dec . . 2 .. 0 the A& O o 4 ' 2V2 Quarters at r k t 32,4 a t tot' A I 4) ----- at ...Ts 2.0t 9 ------- at loos va • 2.1 ------- at 9 gs oa '5 66 --- at 9 6, 6tl 160 -- at 9 7, .4 737 at 96s o f 470 at 93 o d 228 --- a t 94' 300 --- at 9 25 d -- at 0 25 ° Ol. st, ----- at 915 od 397 —_-_— a t gus 100 at '393 'A 47r ---,---- at 83$ 0. titani'lvaesrta gKee:i°trins 1 RETURN OF WHE By Messrs. CHILD and including only torn agreeably t ic4. Quarters at tr)s od 140 --- at I as od itS -- at t 17, ad. , 9 at t 16s tud 176 •-••••••"". at t lss od 128 at 114$ od 176 at 113 s cd 299 at od 146 ----• at 1 1 is od 19 at i los od to ----- at lo9s od 537 at lobs od 321 at lo7s cd 4 1 i ----- at io6s od at 1055 od 30 at io4s od Total 14,136 Quarter as.. aid. lower A O J. Front Nov. 03, to . NoV. 2.4, from the Cocket-Dfncel Sacks. • s. d. Sacks. 5.,0. S;.cks• 87 6 4 2 --- too 0 1 92 —92 6 I a ___... iia ° ~ . , , I 18 ' .2 4' ----". 95 0 439 —9 2 0 ) ........ D) 43 —:-- 94 6 .. .-- "., 4 7 ---, 9 I 0 • 30 ____ b. 7 3 4 .--..-.. 94 0 )- ' 733 —9? o I 56 ":„. $o ; is_ 93 6 I 1;5 -- 'O9 of • 2,0 ~... 1443 93 0 Sacks. S —BB o 1 7o;-$01. lotal-21,949 Sacks. ---Average 945. sid. P e , __,...-- -.- os. ad. lower than last week. _.....----- ------ 40S• od. to 1305. °u. Ott.W to S, do. ' toS. od. to 71S. do. 365. od. to 455. cit.r"', ~1 Ss. od. to 125, od, iis• od. to 2ts. od 60. . od. to do• od. to 435. do. S. od:t6 clo• ')Ys. SEEDS. Red Clover - , White ditto - Trefoil - Rye-Grass - - White Mustard Seed Brown"ditto Turnip - - - _Carraway Seeds . New Carraway Coriander Seeds VRICE Ot tic. BAGS. , ROCXET S. i, 0 4 ' Kent, 41. to. to 51. , 155. Kent, 41• to , s? I. I n i 5.. ,. Sussex, 41. os. to . os. Sus sex, 3,1. cs to 4 , 1 , 0 , Essex, 41. 'Gs. tto 5 1 . 125. Fartlllan,l, SI. — Sr t° " S• Yearling Bags, 31 to 41 4s per cwt. vs • NEWGATE Aril) LEADENIIALL MARt‹,,, Say the'Carease. s.o rt, Beef. 3s. 2(1. NT-041,. 4s , 2 1 (1. Mutton 4s. od. to' 4s. 10(.1. Pork S. 4:1• _ RAW Best Ilei!ers &Steeri,(per st.) 25 lod to 3S 4d Middlings. ;s id Sheep Skips -11.1)ES. , 4 . 0 ts. 4 O r dinary 2s 2 a e,‘li I.lll.arket:Call,fss sr) j o s 0 14s . citi tu 2s 6d to. 5 5 0_ • , RICkl k)I St. James's Market ss. 30 1 Clare Market ss. Whitechap.Marketss;• 24: • per stone of 81b. Yss. Average price Ss. *l. ------,_—_,... -'llol%iv'till}atlilt;rt 895. 6,1,-'5. 4' Yellow Russia 905. 96, White tlo. 83 5 • oi l. os• ° Soap do. 88s. —6 ' . O th ' -0," Melting Stulf7os. ,„5. Ditto rcugh $0". ---s , Graves 14s. o ti. 9 Qc l ilgs 4 5. od. 0 , ,ttled, 114srv.---cuttl, °4, ".. '..9a:—!!!--!----; Yellow Scap, icts.--:-Mo. Price of candle. per :167 en, St. lAMES's lilV MARKET, DEC. 2. 6, 1 1 Hay, 31. 15s. cd. to 61. 65. oct.—AVer. 5 . 15 -' , 60 , Straw, 11, to, od to 2.' 5 . 3 c —Aver ;11. 2 ' ' WIIITECITAP EL HAY MAltgf.'l% .6J. flay 51. os. od. t. , 6f. SZ. pd :—Avcr. 5,1. )4s• ( 4, New ol os, oct. to 0 1. O. Od.-= Ayer'. oi. C S : oa , Clover, GI. 45. od. to 71. 16i od.—Avar• 7 1 . 5 ' i, Straw, 11. tlii.'od. - to 21_.,.6; 01g.,-Ave.r.?.l. 4i. 64 __—_— : c o A. L-NIAKK ET. Shills at Market. Sold. V' ic l e , s l - to 75/ ~ N0v.2,7. ;29 Newcastle . 94, at 6- 6 ; ( 1 to 6°6 : ''' lb Nevicaitie I s . ar '64 6 _ , d TO 7:) , _ 6.1::. 0 , 6s 29. 11 NeKcastle' -2, ) at a- 0 tc, , , • Dec. 4. 4 Sutulet land 4: .a t 65 6lt/ 7) at éss ~ , 131 Newca,tie - ~.i ................,,,,,