The Sun. — London, England, 1808-08-06 00:00:00

HOME CIRCUIT. CHELLTSFOLD, AVG. 4. ' The Lnun CHIEF JUSTICE and_the CHIP? BARON - of the EXCHEfIuEIt arrived here last night. This mai - ping, atter the usual ceremonies, airy proceed ,/ ed 1,1 hold the A-sizes- 7 they wt-ti to Court rather ia!e, and very iittle no , ,iness was done to•day. The gof eaiendar is very light, there not being twenty ( pr'isoners, and the cases sit general for trivial offence. CIVIL ',WE. BEFORE THE CaIE•F BARON, Nl'o< 0 /Y. MOOR E. I‘..Sr; CARROW stAlcd that this was an anion for a:1 assault. Ho :stated that. the Defendant meeting with the Mannar at a publie-house, who was a) vender of fish, atior a few ei.ws in friendly chat hail a t - nin.l to she w his Wit, and therefore he mixed some rii't whit , the ot grOg. This, to be sure, ‘Aiasta. trer a free joke, luiLt the fisnman thought it a stall one, and therefore threatened to retort it, hat the dcidleman took the red-kot poker from the firei and was abota to knock the Plaintiff down. It }eared, however, that the „constable of the parish' happeqed to be of the parts', and he being a man of ttte lad, caught the blow, declaring art he same time be would not suffer such a wea;ott to be used, be cause it was not a Lufui way of knocking' a mall's Er rains out. The Defendant was therelbre restrained 'trial' his intent, and only gave the-Plaintiff a couple of smart blows oker the bead with Itk fists. It was for this he demanded -dam Ages, not vindittive, but 01.11 as would rest rzfin the Defendant flOlll being too • viOko in future. Onry one witness was called , and he proved an asault, but also that it was preceded by tnucli abu sive language from tylth sides, 'the Plaintiff having repeatedi . i pef:•ndant a " Beggar." i\ir. Ste•rjeant Slit:l'3ElW, in his address to the Jury, treated it as a contemptible action, and not worth the consideration of the Court. The Jury foutid for the Plaintiff—Damages ss. ' CROWN SIDE: AXFORK LORD LLEI,BOROUtiIf. • John MIA WAS charged ‘s•ith stealing a young brown mare of the value of 201. the property of - It. Wingfield. It appeared in this case that the mare was turned out without shoes, and was"seen in the owner's field at Billericay, on the afternobn of Wed- - ncsday, the 2d of March last. She was missed . on • the morning of the 3d of March, and the prisoner was seen with her in the town of Hertford, near 40 mileg distance, where he had to attend as a wit ne,s at the,Assizes about nine.o'clmck on that morn ing. He titre procured a farrier to shoe, her, and to dress het shottlicr,which was much injured, as the pri , onei said, by a fall, but-in the judgment of the farrier b. hard beating with a 'crick, a bruise being raised o: the size of both his fists - . The account the prisoner gave that he had that morning got the mare in exetrange for a Chesnut horse, giving 51. to Oust. • On the 12 , ;) of the same .mouth he sold the ware to a publican, of the name of ho agreed to give him 1.51. part of which, he paid down. A few days. alter Spink saw an advertisement describing the man and the mare, • and from the information the Prisoner had given him, be pr4cu , ed his apprentnsion at Saffron Wal den. Tate Prisoner stated to the Constable who apprehended him, that he had exchangrd a cheqtut horse for the mare on the 3d of March, at about efeven o'clock, and that ,she was shod when he gut hpr.--The Jury found the Prisoner Guilty—Death. Lilll REPORT. COURT OF CHANCERY. TUM UNIVERSITIES OF OXFORD AND CAMBRIDGE. V. RICHARDSON. A writ of injunEtion some time since issued out of the Court otChaiicery, against Juhn Richardson, of the Royal Exchange, London, bookseller, and others, Defendants, to the Bill of Complaint of the Chancellor,' Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford, and the Chancellor, Masters, and Scho- Ittrs'of the University of Carribri(ige; enjoining the said Defendants to desist ficlll selling, of exposing to sale, any wore copies or itni)re,sions of Bibles, New Testaments, and Books of Common Prayer 6f the Church of England, printed in Scotland, or elsewhere, without the authority of the said Com pl3M.:ntsand his Majesty's Printers, until the said D. lendants had* fully answered the said Complain ants' Bi:l. An order was..afterwards made that: the - said in joricikin should be cominued till the hearing of the cause, and on appeal to the House of Lords.the order %%as contirruel.` Notwithstan:lng the said itinnetion, the Com— plaina:its latt ly ob!altied proof of the sale of some of the books at the shop of the a•lendant, John Rich , ardson ; and on the gth of May last a motion was made in the Court of Chanc-ry, that •the said De fendnit might be couimitted to the .custody of the tVzr.kti of 1;13 Majesty's ison of toe Meet, f o r obedit.tace of the said iojunction ; but in order to in duce the Complainant not to press - the 'nuncio against the DetcuLlant, his Gainsel admitted thlt he had stye; .J - . COpies of the Scotch editi‘ws in his warehouse, Prop,;sed that lie should undertake to send back - every cnpy to Scolla , 'it - immediately, tuid 'tiec*r incire direr try 'or nid reTtly, ooncet tied in buying or selling any of the said books, alai that h6.-shout make tin affidavit to that effect which propoSal.lieing stated to the Curet, and the und,.-rtAkiug tRi the part of the said J ohn Richardson being solemnly made by Coon tin. Coon, the nuStion Was waived". 'ue Uni,.ersities havelttrth:r evidence of the sale ..of Bibles, Testaments, and Common Prayer•boOks, _printed by the King's Printers in Scotland, by Many houses, as well in •ditkrent parts of the coon try as - in the mettopons, are preparing to move the Court of Chantey tor an Mit/in:A:ton and account ! against several ot. those who, nottt ithstandink notices . have continued to sell such books ; being deterwin- , e i their prkileges by every Igal method in their pu er, it(r ° ainst those who persist ht . vending •either the Scutche:litions of the Bible, Testament, c4Junitori Pr,-,yer-book, or any other printed tAvi4)ota:. due authurity.--thqord, 3ufy 16, 1808. BRITISH REVIEJF. APIIITIONAL OBSEIMTV)NS ON THE 'AMERICAN 'TREATY, WITH SOME REMARKS ON MR. BARING 7 S QsIFHL.ET j BEING A CoNTINUATIOI4 of THE LFT 'IyIS OF DECIUS, TO WHICH 1i ADDED, AN APPENDIX OF STATE PAPERS, INC.LUDING THE TRELITY. BY THOMAS PEREGRINE COURTENAY, ESQ. We resume our Extraas from this Pamphlet, which enters into a fuli investigation of the subject of the Differances'between this. Country and Arne rica, an investigation founded on indisputable (Vs, and supported by solid argiinient and fair deduoo4l. It• will be seen that the famous pamphlet of " 'War in Disguise" is brought forward in page 7, as the cause of Afv ,- . Pitt's cietehitination to en- 'crease the vexations 41 America, and in page 7a, as one of the means ea iployed to prepare the public f o r then. ih e w h o l e ',formation -of the purpose in Mr.'l'itt's mind 'beingcjui,te Imaginary, it is fiery un important to inquire whether Mr. Stephen's pant phet was its Cause or its o.,ffea. The shortest an swer, however ) to these ingestions speculations upon' the origin and tendency of this celebrated pam phlet, rests upon the fact--that '' War in Disguise" was published in the 061ober of the same year, in the June of which the,,Bssex had been condemned on appeal. But this - is unimportaii,t; not so is the charge against Mr. Pitt, of hawing, - for - commercial pur 7 poses, interfered %% it li the admlnistration ofjusticeiu the Court of Pri'ze. Mt. Baring is, in this instance, and indeed throughout the w bile of his pamphlet;inclined to give much. more - inipornoice to the complaints and -the clamours of Mercantile bodies than either be longed to them of right or was possessed in fad. - That any commercial consideration influenced, even indirectly, the decisiens of the COurt of Prize, Mr. Baring will find, it much easier to assert than. to prove; hut that Mr, Pitt interposed his influence as a Minister, over the Judges of a Court of. Law, is an imputation vihicli ought by no moans to have been, hazarded. Witch Mr. Baring si)eaks of the " comprehewiive Mina of Mr. Pitt," be carries with him the sentiments of every reader of his work ; but few indeed are .those who would - not estimate .higher even than his comprehensive the 'inflexible -integrity of Mr. Pitt ; .his utter ab horrence of injustice, or iniquity, and that loftitiess of character which prompted him always to vindi cate his actions upon the motives whic s aduaily produced them. He was accustomed to hold mea sures, he inherited the principle of doing what he thought right, in spite of opposition or clamour. — Had he determined,- therefore, to recall the indul gentles afforded to the Neutrals, he would have fol lowed his course it the preceding war, he would have varied the instruct-Akins to cruizers; he would base boldly altered the law, not wrested it to his purpose, and he would have justified his meascires in the, lace of his Country and the wo. - Id. Had Mr. Baring sat in Parliament with Mr. Pitt, I feel , convinced that he would never have thus asrrsed his character. Sir Francis Baring was, al was s I believe, a political ovonent of Mt. Pitt ; to however, 1 would -appe - a - V - contidently on the improb,bility of his son's charge. Sir Francis dif . - fered from Mr. Pitt upon most essential points ; and thought him, perhaps, in many, fundamentally wrong, but never; I venture to assert, did he trace. ii his measures the species of failing which Mr. Baring has now discovered I Let Mr. Baring imagine to himself; his respeaed father accused tit unfairness in .his dealings, and he may form an idea of tile virtuous indignation with which Mr. Pitt, if happily sutviving, would have repelled his injurious aspersions. Another class of misrepresentations still remains. They relate to the former praCtice in regard to the rule of 1756. " When the principle of i 756. was established, the language of Lord Chatham was as bold as the measure itself; and Sir Joseph Yorke, instepp of searching for a justification of the writers on the Law of Nations, ft - ankly told the Dutch, " that his" Majesty could ncit otherwise get out of the war with safety." Hail Mr. Barii:g proceeded a little further in his examination of the memorial to which he alludes, he would have found a direct appeal not only to the justice of the British claims, but to the former praCiice of the Dutch themselves. incorrect is Mr,. Barring's statement of the pri,cee6ings respecting this Jule in the last war ; and here he is again inconsistent with himself. " First," he says, "it wos voluntarily abandoned Secondly, compensation' va as afterwards made for the con equences of its tern porary execution, by an as which stigmatizes that execution as illegal." Now, .what was voluntarily b'andoned ? Tor( w hat was compensation made ? :For the capture under the rule of 1766 ? Not so, if we lre to believe 'Mr. Ba ring, who IGHS us that the Conarnissioners appointed for this purpose " a arded large sums to the claim atits for losses sustained print ipally,- it not wholly, from the execution of the instr action of 6th Norent ber, 1703," which instrudicm he Las told us just ,before, to some reipeas, " exceeded the rigour of tole of t7.sti. 'there wa sno attempt to detet mine to what extent the neu' gal had a trade with the enemy's colonies before the 1. var, but the whole was devoted to condemnation." Even, therefore, if we th row aside, as Mr. Baring does, the consideration tha i the majority of the Com missioners 'were Americans, we shall be satisfied, notwithstanding, that it %.cas not for the execution of the rule of t 7.s6'that con tpensation was awarded by the treaty . ' of 17941.. Neither, then, if type attend to Mr. Baring, was it the rule of 1756 that we " volunta,ily abandon ed" in January 1794, when so much , of the instruc tions of the precedi'„Jg year was revoked, as pre ,.vented the importa4on of colonial produce into the United States indulgence," granted," accord ' in to Lord Gren . iille, who was Secretary of State at the titne, " (in account of the peculiarity of their local situation."l th , refore, the opinion of Mr. Baring be an,tl the order of 1793 allowed to be con si,ie nt wit l .l the rule of 175L$, we have Lord Gren viL/e's aut . /lurk) for styling the 0rder.01 . 1794, -not l tin abandonment of that rule, but a mere temporary relaxation of its exercise. The third allegation upon which Mr, Baritig founds his assertion of the uniform abandonment of the rule of 1756, relates • 'to 'the convention with '- itiiscia, negociated by Lord St. 1801.— " In this Treaty," says .Mr. Baring, not only the rule of the war dt 1756 is not recognised, but the right of the neutrals to trade with the colonies of our enemies, and from his own country in the pro duce of those colonies to-the mother country is eX.- pressly stipulated." And again,. " a formal Treaty with a friendly power, established 'principles ly opposed to_it," Now let us examine the correatiess of these 're= preSentations. What- is, the stipulation between us and. Russia ? Is there indeed an express recogni tion of the right; even of Russian subjects, to trade with the colonies of our enemy - It is hardly necessary to observe that the COnven tion of 1801 -was occasioned by the second of those Treaties which are commonly known by the name iof the Armed Neutralities. Its object was to adjust between Russia and Great Britain the point's of dif 7 ference expressed in those Treaties. The rule Of 1756 had not been adverted to by the Northern Powers, either in 1780 or in 1800. The question, probably, had never arisen bet Ween Great Britain and Russia. It was not, therefore; among the sub:- jeCts of discussion at`it. Petersburgh. The leading principle of the armed neutralities, (familiarly known by the 'expresion " free ships, free goods") implied; that the property of ari enemy in the ship of a friend; was not liable to confiscation. In the Convention OflBo t there is an express renunciation of this prin ciple, and to the paragraph asserting the contra,ry, a clause is added which declares, that hostile pro duce acquired by a neutral, and transported on hid account, is not ,0 be considered as enemy's pro perty. Without being mcquainted with the history of this clause, it is. not easy ,to ascertain precisely .the purpose which it was intended to answer. I ap prehend that, independently of this stipulation, the goods described in it would not have been consider ed as belonging to an enemy. But as questions of property are among the roost frequent atad difficult whkh arise in prize causes, and colourable transfers . of hostile property - to neutrals are-.notoriously fre quent, cases may possibly have occurred m which the - proof of the transfer being deficient, really neu tral cargoes have been condemned. And - the new clause may have been conceived by the gussians, to afford some'seenrity against .such condemnations,:--- In this view ; the clause appears to have-bee nuga tory: But whatever else might have been the occasion or intent of the clause., no recognition of the colonial mde, nor indeed any allusion toit whatever, was in the, contemplation'of those who framed it. That such vecognition, however, would be its etiea, apprehended in this country soon after the arrival of the Treaty, and a separate article was therefOre ded, in plain terms forbidding the dire& trade with the colonies of an enemy. I ha ve thought it necessary to give this history of the transaalcm, because I am unable to, discover whether it is In the original clause, or in the expla-: nation, that Mr. Burin finds his " principks di redly opposed tc , the role of P 756," or his . " express stipulation" of I - he freedom of the neutral_ trade Iv all rii),(llC COIVITy, ' Some of Mr. Aaring's expressions would incline me to think, that he refers to the original clause, and is unacquaintea. with the explanatory declara , tion. But this can lia;dly be, becallse if he had any right.at all to rely upoi? the general expressions of that clause, he would have rejeiled the distindion between the direci and the circuitous trade. If the clause referred at all to the colonial trade (which it certainly did notj it absolutely legalized it in all its branches. Is it then Upon the two paper together that Mr: Baring relies ? The declaration provides that ,nothi ng in the former article contained, shod authorize the direct trade between the hostile colony, anl mother country. Now, from this prohibition of the direct trade, an allowance of the indired traffic might wkthout extravagance be. implied; but it is surely not only inaccurate but unfair, to designate tbese words as an express stipulation in favour of the cir-' cuitous commerce. But, the sequel of the declaration puts the matter out of doubt. Russia shall " enjoy the same advantages and faci lities," and of course be subject to the same restric tions " in this commerce, as are enjoyed 1 - q the most favoured nations, andespecially by the United States of America.", The erfeet then of this Treaty, so far from "esta blishing, principles dirthly opposed to the rule of 1756,"—is merely to put the question as it 'regards Ruc..ia precisely on, the same footing on which it stands with America ; and we come back exa&ly to the point from which we departed, namely—" What is a dire& trade ?" I should here 'observe, Sir, that Mr. Baring also endeavours to bring forward the Treaty of 1794, in aid of his assertion of the abandonment of -the role of 1156, though he judiciously omits it in summing up his proofs. "In 'November, 1704, an attempt Was made by Treaty to introduce a modification of the rule in question, by stipulating in the . 12411 article, that America should not export to Europe articles the produce`of the West Indies, by which her trade.with all the European colonies would have been confined to the extent of her own con,uniption. This article was rejeaed on the other side, and that rejeelon assented to by the ratification of Great.Bri 7 tan)." (To be continued.) Tuesday evening a servant of one of the Of.cers of the Guards, lying in Deal an -racks, undertook for a considerable wager to place 100 stones at a yard dis tance each, and to take them up separately in his mouth and droP them in a basket in the spate of 60 minutes, which arduous task he performed with ease two minutes .and six - seconds within the time allowed, it being a distance of five miles three quar ters and some yards. lIIGki WATER AT LONDON BRI DG E TO-NIOR- Row. Morning, 48: min. after 1. Afternoon, 4 min. after 3 ,MONDAY. Morning, 2o min. atter,.3. f Atternoon, 3s min. after 3 I.co N1)()N : Printesi h: At tl'e ICti A po kl a . staus, of No. 4. Maqlets-court, Bow - stre e t ; Ni N. 'Strand ; where ildvelizsements, Orders Ind published by WJLLIAF4 ARMICER. SCR let's, SJ:uth Mo;tri .or thp_l'aver, I otters for the Lditor, tic , (gust -paidi 'POLICE. MNICSLON7IIO7.7S4,---BEFORE THE LORD MAYOR. • Isaac Joe4.was brought, ,up on suspicion of belog . one of fhe persons who robbed a Mr.' Zacchary of his pocket-book, in ‘Fleet-stre'ef, on Wednesday of ternooni containing a Bank Note foi- t dol., and a 11• Bank of Euglad Note. Tipper, the Polic:e Officer, stated, that in'consequence of his hearing that there was'a third, person implicated with th e P r i soners it 2 custOdy; J6soh and Joraw, committed by. Alderman Hunter, on Thursday, from Guildhall, he itni»e• diately went in search of Joel, whom he kneWT to he A constant companion Of the other Prisoners ; and frequenting-the same haunts. He soon found 111 Prisoner, and brought him to the Compter added; that the Prisoner was - long 1101ot - fens as stiSpetaed cbaraeler, for Whom he himself and In f . brother officers had been long on. tho watch. Several persons appeared to ,give Joel a char4eter : but the account given by the Police Officer was deemed sut7 ficient by the LORD . AO t 0 'on sus , - picion for further eXamitiation this day. At Union-Hall, yesterday, a genteel, looking young Writhan, named Dogharty, made her appearance ;0 answer to a summons preferred:,against 'her by the Re's , . J. NiiTen, by, whose statement it appeared that the Defendant, on Sunday last, during his performiiig. divine service 'at Vauxhall Chapel, , atiempted interrupt him. The above charge having been fully proved by the evidence of many respectable I,vitT - nesses, the Prisoner was held to bail, in coniutiA(liou with two sureties of 501: each, till the next Get . ter.il Bessions which are to be held in horsenianger-:lane. SPORTING INTELLIGEIVek. KNIGI-I'l'oN. • • TUESDAY, JULY 26. The Iltmier's Stakes of sgs. each, 4.mi:cheats. Mr. Brovvn'sl), g. by Transit, 5 yrs oh, walked over:. • WEDNESDAY. Fifty Pounds, for ail ages_, ... 4-rivile he a ts. Mr. Goulburp's ch. c. R omeo. by Velll42or, 4 yrs old • r Mr. Canniiig'S.ch. g. S wee; ei . - - - 2 z. The S vvecpstakes of togs. each, was walked over for, by MVO% Gotilburies ch. c. Romeo. LUDLOW.. , • lii:RSDAY, JULY . A Maiden Plate of 501. for all ages; three-Mile heats. Mr. Coulburn's ch. c. Romeo, by Vernator, 4- yrs old . - - - - - - - - .3 Mr. Steven's ch. g 4 yis old - - - Mr. Benson's 11, t. Lti,l,3-yrs , old - 2 z Alr. G re?ves's b. c. Icy, 4-yrs (Ad - - 4 4 Sweepstakes of zags: each, for all ages, 4 miles. ( Subt' s scribo's ) • Lord Stamford's eh. h. St. Doming6';' by Ilambletonlai; walked over: ; FRIDAY. • Hunters Sweepstakes of logs each, (6 SubsCribers)'. Mr. lienson's b. it. kishelman, by Giut.b.:, Bst. - - Mr.'Adarns's bl. g. s. years old, Bst. tolb I ian Plate of S 1 Mr: 13ensonisb. 1. Cc.ilia, b) .13 , :ningbrough, tint • old, 84E. 2113. - • - Mr. Goulburn's b, c. Whitenose, 4 years, Sat. r 2 7 , TOTN ES. ruEsuay, JIOLY 19. Fifty Pounds free futalt horses, berti, Mr. Webb's b. g. Vidette, 5-y aged Sst. jlo , z 441 r. Weir's cli. g. Wuodcot, aged,. r ,. z Mr. Coward's h. g. Canterbury. aged, Sst. i lib 3 3- Mr. Kenipson's br. AnOrew, aged Sst. tUb . virEDNEs-DAY. A Handicap Sweepstakes vs jga. each —Z mile beat, Capt. }larding's ch. g. Sir Hugo, lost. 41b. t 2 Z Mr. Kernpson s br. g. Andr ew , lost. 64b . . 3dr M. REVIEKZI, ill a letter to Sir W. JONES, hen tions. the tbllowing anecdot repe hug the celcbittei. Persian Poet, HAFEz i—" . ..After the death of ibis great man, some of the religious were dispoci-to deny his body the rit e o f sepulchre, alledgiug i ob jedion the licentiousness of his poetry. Atter : lon&," dispute they. left the decision ;to a divination i t use amongst them, by Opening his book at randoty4 and taking the first couplet wittekoccorted. It hapreued to be this : . • Turn not. away from Hafees bier, Nor scornful check. the pitying tear, • For though iinrner.'ci in iii he lies, His soul torgiv'n to Hevin shall rise. This passage was, deemed :a divine decision ; the religious withdrew their Obje6tions, and h e w as buried in Mosella, a place rendered _famous by his Own verses. t••• Sfi IP A' L !VS • GRAVESEND, AUGUST 4. Passed by—the Niie, Pringle, iroin litogadc+re - ; Equiiy, Harweod, from jersey ; Neptune, from -FteliAo - ; Ranger', Stierbourn, from Gibraltar; Hope, 13isliAi, from NJ aita i • Amy, t f uteninS, from NI adyi r a ;" Flora, from the lirazila; Diana, Noble, from Valencia; Expes;i -meta, Trotter, and the Inverness, Viekerinan, from land. II 1 On IVedneSday, at his seat at Chaddesden, near Derby. the. 'Lady of Sir Robert Nieade Bart. of a Snit. Utz "Thursday; in Thnyonorton-street, the Lady of 13. Icig feu, L4q. of a Daughter. On tae 4th inst. the Lady of the Rev. Henry Hodges, 0 - Beckly, Stissex, of a Son.. , The sante day, the Lady of T. R. Andrews, Esq.-of TA vistock,place, of a Son a .d Heir. m4Rn Oa the 22d ult. at 'Sturrniti's lown, Mr. 1. W. Moor-' , of Sokiti. Atate str.tet, l)toiitt, , rt) Miss Mary , frewait, Fowl dattglyer of the late lames Stewart, Esq. A few Ohs ago, W. l'. GrahJin, Esq. of His Majesr)' s : First Regiiiittit of Foot, or Royals, to Miss Bilhog, tiaoglster Of W. Billing, Esq. or North 'Dublin. Lately, Timothy' Forde, E5q....4 . Ford's Grove; in O r : . County of Ka() , 41ZE.'1 . a Lututslity of seventeen yvir:i and . se" vrn days, to- Miss Air . y KrLg.in, or 13 , tilyia,:.agh,- near 1 - 2 s: 5(:41 . 1), ni the Czunty o: 1);101in. (in Tblirsday Grettla Green,, Lewis Frazerf" Es 4, of Ulu tits; Intdntry, to Miss Latilenliz crt Wl', ham's, Esq. of' Wiictort, near ;ik:rc.iord 11112. D On Sunday evening, at :he seat of folua Lod4e s . , Esq. Ic!' 3 , Wilcock s, Esq. youngest Son 01 th: Late Esq. of Nop.victt. • On Wedi,eSnay, Airs. BbyS, widOw of Lieutenant- Col.er:'-' l ' Boys. (hi the Jztlt ult. at Newburgh, in Fit:sh re, - IVI rifle, a tedclicr Qf vocal n.ust.. , On the 7 , i11 t. Claw, in the King's County, Itelar;(f john joshua only son of I , ,shua Esq..: 4 o;‘ 21 years. ti lLn OP . YESTfiI STOCKS RDA Y. Bank Stock. Javy s per Cent. 98 risk' 5 per ,ent. 4 Lo , :r Cent. 84i oei Cent. Ke,l 68 if 3 'per ;.:ent. Con. 6 7 A k slank L . Ann. i 8 i5-16inii India Stock, I trdra - Bums, ss. 6s. pr. Lxcheciu:r 4* , • 7' . P r ' 6 t. Im l yeriA 3 per Cerit. 67i i)nto,kn,,, 71'r I.:Ertrl , i Cuirs. WI 2jill ,n,t. 67 i strC:t, foi verv,r- sq u a rcr. 11.1s[ b ajureiseci.,