The Sun. — London, England, 1818-05-26 00:00:00

li:iment shnnid in that event be -cunitunile(t to I I The F,arl GREY said, he might perhaps he ac cuaeil of pertinacity, hut he naist state that he 1-rti..ined of Iht. Same Opi tirit nn necessity ‘whatever livid been shewn for the enactment of this (+first , . The Noble Eatl opposite had widerstood the arguments of his Noble Friend, in sepia/sing that his Noble Friend wished- to le Zi" l,tte upon the principle of there being no probabi lity of the King's recovery. 'Pic argument of his Noble Friend was, that as by bringing in this Bill it was acknowledged by the framers of it there was a much less probability of the King's teenvery, that therefore that ought to be proved, 4ind if proved, that it ought to extend to a gene al revision of the Regency Act, particularly with -regard to the Windsor establishment, which, he most stilt contend, required considerableereduc- Got. In answer to the argument of there being Ito information as to the probability of the King's recovery, the Noble Earl referred them to the Bulletins of the - Physicians, but surely it was not meant to be contended, that this afforded any in toimation.as to that probability; the Bulletins •merely e.nuouticing the state of his Majesty, with out stating any thing as to there being any, and what, probability of his recovery. There was cite point, tvith regard to a possible contingency, respecting tie meeting of Parliarneot after a dis-• 'solution, to which he wished to allude. In the event of the demise of the Crown, after the dis solution of Parliament, and before the assembling of the new one, then, of course, by the act of the demise, the *King's writs ceased to be opera tive, and the old Parliament most re-assemble ; but, itt the case of the demise of the Prince Re gent during such an interval, the writs for the new Elections being issued in the Ti ng's name, a doubt might arise, though the t..:1 Parliament watt directed to te-assetuble immediately, how lar the King's writs were vacated, and to ptevent these disputes which might take place, from Can didates insisting upon Sheriffs' ptocteding with the new Elections, it would be advisable to in troduce some proviso to enact, that, in such an event,, the King's writs for the new Elections should ceise to be operative. The Lotto CHANCLLoa, with regard to the Reports respecting the state of the King's health, observed, that the Noble Earl who hail just sat clown was mistaken in supposing that notleng but the Bulletins of the Physicians were referred to, as the Queen's Council, before tuaking their Quarterly Reports, not only examined tlie Phy sicians as to the actual state of tke King, but with regard to any probability of his recovery. These Reports were regularly made to the Privy Council, as directed by the Regency Act, and might be called for by Patliament whenever it was deemed adviseable. His Lordship then pro posed Clauses, with a view to the possible event of the demise of the Queen, alter the lay appoint ed for the meeting of a new Parliament, previous to the day of the meeting, and on the - day of the dissolution ; their Object was, as was utiderstood, that the new writs should be operative, and that the Parliament should be summoned to meet within sixty clays. Ws Lordship • added, that he intended to propose a clause to obeiate the diffi culty stated by the Noble Earl (Grey) wiilt re-. Bard to the possible event of the demise of the Prince Regent, his opinion being. that the King's writ would not in that case be vacated. 'clue original clause respecting the nieeting o f rarlimnent WilA agreed to, and the 1 otuer amend ments being made, the House resumed, the Re port- was received, and ordered to be taken into further consideration to-morrow, and the Bill to be printed as amended. Lord SinmovTit gave notice, that be won't, 00 Wednesday next, move the second reading of the Alien Bill. Lord 1-10eLAND intimated his intention of op pusing the Bill. POOR LAWS. The Earl of Ha.apa IcKg moved the Order of the day for the" House resolviog itself into a Com mittee upon the l'oor - Laws Amendment The Noble Earl prefaced his mmion by a short and rapid:review of the several clauses of the gill, which he submitted for their Lordships' approval. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE COMlllelitCd upon the spirit and principle of she gill, to which he Strongly objected, mid in particular he remarked upon the extreme impolicy of the clause ‘xhich enah)ed churchwardens to take the children of paupers fiom their parents, and Atinsign them to the care of a work-hou , e. This was calculated, as he feared, to weaken those social feelings on which the very strength and consistency of society depended, and if that clause were pressed farther, he should feel himself compelled to take tie sense of the House upon it. He despaired of any effec tual relief upon this subject, while the labouring classes of society were suckled to look to the pub lic as a means of future support. , The only effec tual remedy for this was, to raise the wages of the labouring classes to an amount calculated to sup port the labourer and his family, and front which some little saving might be made against sickness and age. The Noble Marquis also objected.to the clause enabling parish officers to take land and let it out again to paupers, thus establishing a system of farming. This clause he thought very objectionable: for if the land thus taken were waste and bad land, tabour would be only thrown away in fruitless endeavours to ttirn it to advan tage ; and if, on the other hand, the land were good, this system would ouly"give relief to one class of persons, by turning another class out of employment. Labour, lie contended, should be permitted to find its level ; and if this were not admitted, he feared that wages would be reduced all over the kingdom to the lowest possible pit tance. Within a few weeks he had, with alarm, heard that this very practice had already com menced among the labourers at Birmingham, for their employers observed to them, " It matters not to you how low your wages . may he reduced, because your parish will make,tip the difference," In the Committee, the clause enabling church wardens to hire houses for the care of the child ren of paupers was read—and after a few words front the Earl of Liverpool, the Margais of Lans downe, the Bishop of London, and the Marquis of Buckinghatu, the clause was rejected without a The clause Or charging the owners of small houses, incteari of the occupiers, to the poor's rites, beina read, the House divided, - when there ppeareti For the Clause Ag it Majority .The other ehlose.: were tu,:reed to, and the House havi t . resumed, the Report was Ordervd to be brought in to-morrow. PARI'[I VF TRIES BILL. The Parish Vestries Bill went throil,,h a Com mittee, and ihe report kr a s ordered to be received t o-mormw CHUBCIIES BUILDING BILL. The Earl of Sna.F - rv.snunv having brought up the Report of the Committee on the Churches Building Bill, Lord HOLLAND moved a clause, enacting, that, from and after the passing of the Act, no person in IJuly Orders should be liable to any penalty for reading the Service of the Church of England, or sucii parts of the Scriptures 114, according to the Service of the Church of England. might be read in Churches, in any part of England or Wale . s, any Canon or Statute to the contrary not withstanding, Lord liAnßownY observed, that all the ob noxious provisions of the 22c1 Charles 11. had been repealed in 1812. Ile emiceived the Clause moved by thL. Noble Lord would have the effect of subverting the discipline of the Church. The Archbishop of CANTERBURY was perfectly satisfied, that whatever interpretation was 'given to the Act of Charles the second—whether it was to be considered as repealed - (re pealed_ it certainly was with respect to the Dissenters)—or whether it still had any authority over the Meinhers of the Church of En:4land—he was certain that the whole Canons of the Church would be over-ruled by the proposed clause. Lord I-10t,L. ND ext , hiued. The 1,01:0 (t- ANC:ELT:OR said, _if this clans- shontd be ad°l ll, ds there would he nothing t prevent Dii hie tier ice hying performed in any portonr or in any shop of the hang dom. The clonse was then negatived, and the Report agreed to, and the Bill ordered to be read a third tune to-worrow.— Adjourned. 110VE OF CONINIONS. PETITIONS. Petitions were presented from Sir T. Alderson, from the Glaziers and Piumbers of London, from the proprietors of Mines in Cumberland and Northumberland, against the Mines Assessment Bill ; also from Mr. Fuller, praying to . be heard by Counsel against the same. Petitions were presented against the Poor Settlement Bill, from Worcestkr shire by Mr. Lyttelton, from Eieter by Mr. Ctrurtcnav, from Plymouth by Sir C Pole, front Wolver hampton 'by MY. Littleton, and from some other places. Mr. CHICHESTER presented a Petition from John Thom son, a distiller of Carrickfergus, complaining of his business being stopped by the arbitrary conduct of the Commissioners of - Excise. Mr. C. urged the necessity of revising the law so as to limit the powers of the Commissioners. The Negotiable Securities Bill was read a second time. The East India shipping Bill and the East India Marriage Bill severally went through Committees, and were reported. The 'Widows' Prize-money Bill was read a second time. The Clandestine Marriage Bill went through a Committee. The Report was received, and ordered to he printed. • The Irish Fever Bill, the Silk Bounty Bill, the Irish Bank Restrioion Bill, and the Irish Auction Bill, were severally read a third time, and passed. • Mr. lIKOUGHANI brought up the evidence of the Com mittee on Eduction. Mr, D. GILBERT brought up the Eleventh Report of the Committee of Finance. MINES' ASSESSMENT BII.L. Mr. MOREIrr moved the second reading of the Mines' Assessmeot Bill. Mr. BROUGHAM said, that as this was a late period (Attie 'Session to introduce a Bill on the delicate subject of the Poor Laws—a Bill, too, objectionable in principle, as it went to extend and not to narrow the limits of the assessment, he trusted the I-lon Mover would consent to withdraw it. Mr. Nionurr contended, that the Bill was only to pre vent an evasion of the present laws. By a decision of the Court of King's Bench it was determined, that though the Owners of Mines who received a share of the gross produce wet e to be assessed to the Poor Rates on that share, yet if they commuted it for a money rent they were not liable to he assessed at all. The Bill was to remedy this inequality, and at any rate he thou:4A that. either all mines should be sub ject to the rates or all should lie exempted. Mr. D. GiLBERT said, that though, front his property in a mining country, it would be his interest to oppose all charges on mines, he could not help considerim; the Bill a fair one. In the county of Cornwall, where 9- intlis of the mineral produce of the Liegdom was raised, with the excep- tiro. of coals. which were subject to peculiar laws, the owners of the mines bad always been rated, and it was only a quibble that the owners of any min-•s had heed exempted. There was a difficulty in the case in which the owner was the sole adven turer in the mine. In that case the Honourable Mover.of the Bill had talsen the share which might lie considered due to him in his cha; octet. of 'proprietor, as 1-12th, which he (Mr. G.) thought a fair proportion, and had rated hint accordingly. Sir C. MONCK opposed the Bill. Lord L..iSCELLF.S trusted the- House would adopt the measure. Little hml liven said against the principle, and the Clauses which *Ore considered objtictionable might be amend ed in the Committee. Mr. S. BOURNE professed himself friendly to the The conduct of his Honourable Friend (Mr. Gilbert) on the occasion redounded witch to his integrity and public-spirit. Lord NIORPETH spoke, but in solow atone that we could• not hear him in the Gallery. Sir .1. GRAHA NI conceived it doe to the parties whose in terests were affected by the measure, to postpone its further consideration until the next. Session. As an Amendment, he therefore moved, that it be read a second time that day six Months. The 1.-louse then divided...-. For the Bill A;aittst it 54 Majority —lB The Committal of the Bill, after a desultory conversation, in which a further postponement was recommended by Mr. Brougham, in order to afferd time to the parties, was fixed fur Wednesday next. . . CHARITABLE FUNDS. Mr. BROUGHAM rose to propose an Address to the Crown for certain Account A. It appeared, that, some years ago, an individual had bequeathed a sum, amounting to 120,000.1. to charitable purposes. The will, on the ground of. some in formality, was set aside ; and the testator having noliindred, the property devolved to the Crown. His intention, in mov ing for an account of that property, was to consider whe ther that might not he a proper fund to meet the expence of the Commission about to inquire into the Grants for the Edu cation of the Poor? He therefore moved an Address. to that effect.•---Ordered. PRIVILEGE. The SPEAKER took the opportunity of adverting to an important question of privilege. It was a matter of notoriety, that, on a recent trial in the Courts below, viz. The King, v. slerceron, an examination had taken place of the short-hard writer of that House, relative t• the practice of that House in its Committes, and to what passed in them The House would feel there could net be a more important duty than to protect its witnesses. But it would be impossible to afford that protection, unless the House had some re straint on the manner in which either its proceedings or its witnesses were produced' .in evidence before the Courts of Law. All the instances that he had considered concurred in sheaving, that an application had either been made to the House of Commons, or to the Speaker, for the permission. In a former case, here the short-hand writer was examined, and that situation was then held ,by Mr. Gurney, the Gentleman who holds it at presint, application was made to the Speaker, and a permission granted. It was an extenuation 'of the present irregularity, that, though the permission was given, Mr. Gurney was ignorant of the fact, and remained soup• to the present time. He attended, there fore, in the present case, on the subpcena, under a belief that he followed the same course as WAS adopted before. He thought - the House should ma < ke some Resolution on this ques tion of its privileges. Mr. BATHURST, as we could collect, expressed his inten tion to submit a motion on the subject. SETTLEMENT OF THE POOR. Ou tbs skotiou of Mr. S.. BOURNE, the furinir considers• tion of the Report upon the Settlement of the Poor Bill was postponed for three months. The Bill for regulating the Payment ofNavy Prize Money— the nil for authorizing and regulating the Transfer of Stock between England and Ireland—and the Malt. Duty Bill, were read a second time:and ordered to he committed to-morrow The second reading of the Lunatic Asylum Bill was put off until Monday next. The Irish Assessed Taxes Bill was real a third time and passed, with an amendment, proposed by Mr. Lushington, that no person usually resident within ten miles of any dis trict shall be appointed to collect the Assessed Taxes of such district. The third reading of the Portugal_ Slave Trade Bill was postponed until to-morrow. The Vinegar Duty Bill, and the Tobacco Importation Bill, were severally committed.-I's - port to-morrow% The committal of the Scotch Churches Bill, and the Sol diers' Family Bill, was postponed until to-morrow. The Cutlery Trade Bill went through a Committee, and re ceived several new clauses._Relun•t on Wednesday, The London - Coal Bill, the Irish 7.xcise Licenses Bill, and the Bill for the Encouragement .of Partnerships in Ireland, were severally reported and ordered to be read a third time to-morrow. Mr. LUSHINGTON brought in n Bill to authorize the issue of eleven millions of Exchequer Bills; also a Bill to raise 800,000/. by the issue of Treasury Bills in Ireland ; also a Bill to alter and amend the 43(1 it the King,with regard to the :Ippointment of certain Commissioners; which Bills were severally read a first, and ordered to be read a second time to-morrow. COURTS OF IRELAND. Sir .1. NEWPORT rose, and said, that in consequence of the present state of the House, so few Members being in their places, he (11(1 not think it would be proper to bring forward the motion of-which he had give❑ notice for this day. At the same time he would observe, that he had no wish of postpon ing it, unless it should be stated that come opposition would be made to it. The object of it was, that the House should express their concurrence with the Committee of Finance in their Tenth Report, relative to the Offices of Masters in Chan cery. Mr. Bathurst having expressed his intention of opposing the motion, Sir John Newoort, after a few words from Mr. D. Gil hest, post poned it till Wodnusday next. Mr. WEBBER moved fur and obtained leave to bring in a Bill to extend to Ireland certain provisions id a kill relative to exectitlys under the age of 21 years, and matrimonial con tracts. The Bill was then brought in, and ordered to be read a second time to-morrow. The other or& rs of the day being disposed of, the House adjourned till to-morrow. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, I%lAv 15 . OPERA fIoUSF.—WATERS V. TAYLOR. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL this morning made application to the Court, that the Receiver, ap pointed to receive the rents and profis of the Opera House, upon the sale of it to Mr. Waters, might have his recognizance vacated, and be dis charged ft nu that situation, on the ground that the purchase was completed, and Mr. Waters was in possession of the property. He also prayed the Court that the Receiver might have his costs paid. Sir S. ROMILLY suggested, on the part of Me. Taylor, that the costs ought not to be paid out of the estate, but by Mr. Waters himself, because the appointment of the Receiver was in conse quence of Mr. Waters not having been prepared with the purchase-money at the time of the sale. Mr. HART, OD behalf of Mr. Waters, observed, that it was by the agreement of both parties that the Receiver was appointed. The VICE-CHANcEft.Loa ultimately directed that the Receiver be discharged according to the prayer of his petition, and that the costs be paid by Mr. Waters himself, with liberty for hint to apply' afterwards, for the purpose of showing to the Court that he ought not to bear the charge himself. The case was, therefore, ordered to stand for further hearing on the next petition day. COURT OF YANG'S' B ENCII, MAY 95. BANK OF ENGLAND. GUNDY V. THE OOVERNoPS AND COMPANY OF TH4 BANK Or RNGLAND. (Further Particulars.) This was a Ride obtained last Term by Mr. BROUGHAM, calling ►►pon the defendants to spew cause why a Writ of Mandamus should not issue, commanding them to proceed to divide 14(1101Ig nil the Membtrs of the Corporation, for the time rAteahly in portions, the part, shares, and interest in the common capital stock, of such profits as had arisen out of the management of the said Coiporation, and had not been so divided before ►he 19th of March last, excepting the charge of maintaining the business of the said 'Cmporation. Sir A !ITU tjit PIGGOTT now appeared to sl►ent cause against this rule, and contended, that this Court had no right, still less any power, to in terpose its•anthority to controul the management of any commercial company in its pecuniary con cerns ; for, in 'tact, the interposition of such .power would be an assumption of legislative au thority. But supposing the Court could attract to itself a power so novel and unprecedented, in this case it would appear, from the law as it stood, that the Governors of the Bank of England had no power to divide the stock, or any part of it, or obey the mandate of the Court in the terms now required. Lord ELLENBoRouGH interposed, and asked whether the Corporator, who had applied for the interposition of the Court, should not have used all such means, competent for him to use, to at tain the object he bad in view, before he made this requisition—did it appear that this gentle man had done all that he could have done to wards obtaining the end in view ? Had be'at ' tended the meetings held for the purpose of de claring dividends, and made any resistance to the proceedings of those meetings, or taken any step before the constituted authority of the Corpora tion to effect the purpose of the present appli- Cation Sir ARTHUR PIGGOTT said, that Air. Gundy, the applicant, had certainly not taken those steps, and this was one of several other flat answers to the application. Lord ELLENBOROUGH.—If there is that objec tion applying to the proceeding, I dOn't see how this motion can be entertained. Sir A.• PIGGOTT.—The dividend was made on the 19th of March, and it was declared by the General Court'; and no motion was made by Mr. Gundy for any larger'or any other dividend that] 5 per cent. Lord ELLENBOROUGII.—Nor made .any objec, lion or opposition Sir A. Ptooovr..--There was no motion made by him for any Othei'diiidend, nor did he make opposition to the dividend then declared. Lord ELT.atisottotif a party does not ds sent, he gAtittt:' • Mr. BROUGHAM being called upon for him sel f swer to this objection, said, he felt h, obliged to admit, that it was faralin point o f form to the present application. He had no doub l of being able to satisfy the Court that there WO an overplus of profits divisible in the hands of the Bank of England, independent of all contingeng, demands upon them, and the banking capital Pe' cessary to carry on their business. awiraari Lord ELLENBOROUGH Said, that this could not attain the object of his motio n Per sfii; tens; his motion should first be made to tha COW / competent to give information as to tfie state' °• the tunds of the Corporation; and if they did D°, ` ti .produce the required i n formation , then the r i might be an application for a mandamus to com P e i; them. But he Was now assuming w h at the - 11' 51 " r of the funds was, without adopting the Pr" Pe lIICAII9 of inquiring into the subject. Mr. BROUGHAM said, he could strew by the Geo. 111. that two years since, the Bar.k..hodi.d„lis vided 25 per cent. profit upon their cap ital as he could not get over the preliniinary objeclig ,in point of form, he must withdraw the inotiall° and come better prepared another time. Ift s' g Sir A. PIGGoTT said, that if the case had on, he should have referred to several clauses "- the act mentioned, which would have afforded °I answer to the application, in addition t o seYer6 others with which he was prepared. iE Mr. SCARLETT, on the same side, the application succeeded, no further divid V l, could be declared kir years to come.—Rule charged. said, that 1 RELAN D. DUBLIN, MAT 20, ISIS situ/ PIRACY AND MUUDElR.weekbout six wee an act of piracy and minder was supposed to P-;ft, been committed in Mr. Parker's turf-boat, 04:0 was lying at anchor near Abolish, in this rive r : : - 1 1 are extremely sorry to announce that the sospiel% has been too well founded. On Tuesday la st consequence of private information, i let“ 01 was made on one of the islands convenieal where the vessel lay at the time of the when, melancholy to relate, the three unf orta° o men who composed the crew of the said 13°0 were discovered in a pit, with their thr oat lie from ear to ear, their heads and bodies mu 1 , 40 cerated, and a large rope bracing them t o g h erd The anchor, cables, and parts of the riggillgr n 4.. found secreted in another part of the isit%e. Active measures, such as this nefarious act, 10 quires, are taking by the Magistrates of. the or bourhood of Shanagolden, and there is °Dthe, doubt intertained of a failure in bringiog,,a monsters concerned in it to speedy punish MW (Limerick Chronicle.) Ib e BARBAROUS MURDER.^—FOT some time P - Excise Officets in this district paid differen t to the Commons of Moyree, where illicit the lation seemed to take its stand and bid defitinceo law and civilization. On a late occasion 10., fellows accosted in the following manner Is venue Officer and a Bailiff, in that quarter ion " We know who it is that gives you inforaWor against our stills, and i 4 G —d you shall de see Bridget Cullinan alive again." This (be ration was -not regarded with any seriottsu es % to cause Bridget Cullinan was totally unkOccro-fal the officer. However, it appears that a vy(baitt of that name resided in the neighbourhood) s ' y 4 ,4 these illicit adventerers suspected for I°-I.sci given information against them—and, h °1.1 0 , 0 relate, this marked victim of foul suspico7,4l' most barbarously murdered on the night °,' „here nesday last, and thrown into a well or pool , -ono her body was discovered on Thursday 11-00 ing ! have just learned, that an incl ues "niie ff held on tl4 body by Thos. levers, Esq . ll ,when, after a full investigation of the dieadi j ot CUsliSt4iiCeS, the Jury found " That on the,illos, of the l3th instant, John Burns, Martin ul " Thomas Itoughan, Pat. Sullivan, James Su,itis Michael O'Connor, and J. Whelan, fog etl ' er ; 0 !, other persons unknown, broke into the John Hynes, of Moyree, and thereout they •Biidget Cullinan, late of Moyree, wit°l°,6oe beat and abused in so savage a manner ascess° casion her immediate death, a , r 1 afte r her tlet,aol4 they conveyed her body to a pod o f water' u Y 500 yards from Hynes's house, into Wilic threw it."—(Ennis Chronicle ) __...--j i, t l ' t ~,„ t sa „ Or ' , A s LONDON: Printed by J. B. CARS'rAIRS, to . - by 5' Ormond-street, Queen-so/ire; and published 100 ago , SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South 1401 ton-street, a t ts Of 7 ,!. °dice, No. 112, Strand ; where Adverlis, en2en- • l ' I. Letters j , &e. (lu s t-pail) gost bje addrirotw. . . • ~^, t 4 4 , 14 4 , 4 he pi's E~ ~ 1..1 N5 k w '1 tL e ha t th e 294 1 : 14) 4 s " Li] „ rt h . St 44 tic,. l l): t, • 4 Pr r '1(1 _—_—.. c - BOXING.—The stakes of :-.• tween Oliver and Neal ~., ; h ail,: tl )cif turday night at Oliver's, in Westm inster, 1' rod(lc match on the 10111 of July. A match is als :,ipei between Dolly Smith and Jacobs, for 2 . ° '',,,it all ij a-side, to fight on the same day with 1 3 . 311( Burke, the 18th June. 4 ea ll/P f On the 14th inst. a horrid murder VV9- ,,,i/ °. mitted at Bere Regis, Dorset, on th e ` )- 1,04 15 1 Priscilla Brown, who was called out of l' e a r ,,ol 4° at ten o'clock, and at eleven was found sal set) OS in a back lane near the house. The dec eas l e t i 0 11 left t wo•children, a boy seven years 01 41, T vi 80' 0 tour ; and it is supposed that she Wa s , i i ii n - ol' cl of pregnancy by a man named J&in 631-' iS on strong suspicion committLd for ;121 ' . - C . , iv e' BIRTHSof ,i_ , At Edinburgh, on the 19th inst . tl a LadY Av 4 , Molesworth, Bart, of renearrow, - i ,r ) e . La , ' at his house, Great Russell-stregcl ' Cl l l:t e r s l t e e s r Shaw Lefevre, jun. Esq. of a son. g f; hy , the .-e O , MARRIED On the 25th instant, at Mar .lelionc church , L',i o°, l , Archdeacon Coxe, John Clayton Fr , eling 12sq• sc.c°--t-1".'" Francis Fre - eling, Esq. of the General Po'st Otificf a , „pit'' i third daughter of the late Edward Coxe, Y. 99.• °f ^-1' 41 b Ilf•ath. On Wednesday last, at Cheam, Surrey's J ob , Slid S•.) ' .. of Epson!, to Miss Speck, of North Cheana• gobsr - trill' Ou Saturday last, at St. Andrew's, Holborn, 1) 1 '4O ' cent, Esq. of Lia,:ingball-street, eldest son of It° ,,_ tO;""; I •:... , t r l i t i , e listh f of Br , idgefoot, South MilliMS, MitiLlICC ? the Excise Othce, Broad-street. --,.. if DIED. i f ;" Cati)Pbeillrgo i At Florence, on the ith instant Lady Sir Guy Campbell, Bart. and da• tigh,ter of INionta4kt..- re Esq. of Mark Hall, Ess( x. 36 0 l • On the 18th instant, of a typhus fever, in his age, Dr. John 'Thomson, of Leeds, late of H a bra t c gif. On Frith.) , last, at his lod in s in Suffolk-str"' i Cruickshank, Esq. 4 'the • g g - I, island ot Jamaica. 1 4 ' 6 y the . g. 1, . . Qgf a' .4