The Sun. — London, England, 1809-05-18 00:00:00

• , 1,17 P REPORT. , -t 4 °Us . COURT. tone) tfeinee re rem; F e em eepe. Mr: O'.DEDI Cqued die.pleadiriga on the girt of geanhope. stated 'this: wbe a re4tearing the Whieitihad formerly been before Ileeeer, which lie had'.proeounCed e Decree, great ilea of w inch was, by , the present petition, eetieht - •to' be °mite:el. •He proceeded. to read the preyer ef the• petition, tied elne'objeaionable parts of the Dei4ee. BremeeneexptesSed a hope, se the Noble Earl hat •Counsel We:11 skiff ::d in the laws, and, in the &trio of his particular cas t , that he wont(' en tun the .c nodua of it to thetn. Earl Sretenore said, that there was an old Eng lish saying, and lie thought it a true one, that 'r old birds are not to be caught with chaff." He hoped lie was not, at his time of life, and with the ex he bad - placed hefore him, to be caught in this tuanncr.e . Various efforts had been made to this effete, but they should be utewailing. lie bad a complete knowledge of his. own cause, and of the lee by which it ought `to be regulated; therefore, theogh the general legal knowledge of the Learned Counsel by whom he was assisted might be greater . than that.whieh he hinisotf possessed, he could net cot ent personally to abandon the defeuce of a cause itt which his own charaaet, and whet was still more clear to'hian, the charatiter of his revered and worthy father, was attempted to be called in question. In ceiling on hi's Honour to omit eeeat part of the De e eree pronounced by him in this case, he assured his Honour, that, fliough his objeaiona must be nu ttierous and weighty, be entertained the fulleat re liancenn his love of justice, and on his desire itn , partially to administer it on the present occasion.— If he did not regard his condufl in this light, he should not now come before his Honour to ask him to review his judgment, but should at once go to a higher Tribunal. Of the . Leatned Counsel on the other side, he also found himself bound in justice to say, that though he had formerly in this case, been obliged to treat thein with little ceremony, and Must still continue to do so, so far.as this.cause was concerned, he entertained the highest opinion of their 'general learning and legal knowledge. The first part of the Decree went to refer it to Mr. Har vey, the Master, to inquire into the sale of an es tale fir 2:3,000l. made during the lifetime of his Earl Stanhope, and . whether such sale had been made in terms of the trust, 1774. To tins part of, the Decree his Lordship objeOted, on ,;1, ', variety of grounds. There was no charge of such a ttatestiaion in the Bill; there Wa3' no sentiment to 'support such a charge, had it been nunie ; end 'here W3S rat even a prayer to :'cover' any transaction ‘Otii.)l the late Earl . of Stanhope might have been lecieel, the .Bill beim?: expressly confined to , ee; of sales, whiCit had taken place iluring flirt present E.rl. His Lordship, to Lee : e ea, nini - Ot charge, statemenf, • was settieient trepreclede a plaintiff from I.li- :, nee , red -0 IteeN.dale l 6 book ell Cheectry Pre lice, which Lie, it Jo vvii -that every c h arge tri ,,, t snnp , tied ty a statement, anti that ktknefi x nt b.)r,te out b)' proof : T*e,.ws•re wanting in the pte,ent case ; and it was ebstied for the l.ratord Cia0,....! to alege, as they. h:' that" they be imgylied by t ILL! prayqr for 'general relict such prayer being only meant. to supply any error or amisliion in form, but by no inenits to add to or en large iltv charges specifically , laid•in the- Bill. That iliia«wee the aal& la‘s and of justice,: his Lordship erjeti.edad 'o shed, by notitiog Jour dittkeot unani tie -us decisions of the Hee .e -of Lords, in the course of -:Mr. -Hastings's Impeachment . ; in which it was , held that the twawer of a' defendant, or pt.;r,on ac ute-Jed, could never enitirge or extendethe charge made against: him; that the untitnese of <a person fir a 1-i - oak:elm' office could not be 'admitted to be proV euch unfitness had not originally been elleged ; and where it had been' laid-down:lie a ge neral rule of laeeand of justice, •that nothing'shonid be allowed to be provod. against any mar - which' he had nor been previonsly prepared-to expea.. These dtieisions, his Lordship contended, r drew a circle lotmd the Master of the Bolls, as well as round every., other Judge in thili Country,. beyond the eir curnterence of which he, no more than akirOther Jtulge, was entitled to move. This ortwof klonouria Decree; therefore, his Lordship sUbMitted, must be left out. The second part, which regarded , the immediate calling in of this ea,oool. his laird 'ship conceived musu•also he, om i tte d, for, 'besides laboering udder all the objections which applied to the first part of the Decree, -it was liable to this acl ditional objeaiott, that, it ,seemed to . implv the pro nouncing of a final' judgment 6 . o'On:inquiry. :Be ,was convinced his linnour wotld' be sorry to-think that 'he had determined a point on which he bed ordered izieeiry .to he' made. Yet, this he rnrglit find to be the case, and it might even turn out atter this sum had been called its, that—ir*ad remained on 'Mortgage from good and prudetttiel neativei.— As t o the laying out this sum in the thtee" per •seeits. instead of continuing it ae was designed by the trust CM meagre .iae otherwise, at the Trestee under his Lefaip'e • di:ea - elan might point, his Lordship: conceited this contrary . to an the, povvers in the deed of trust, and to the decisions on the sab,eti. ' also thought ea very doubtful question it thee breeper . cehte. was so ad- ventageous a mode of investment at;' that •of mon• gage, or otherwise suggested bylaw deed.. Herehis Lordship could not belpeeferring to thegross 11 . 10 throWn Out agaiost bitt - fattierlby the Learned Coumcl, '.vho, he was coneincerl i , st r oke only' front i l L,Huctiown • -Yift ktiew it-te be the privi;yge, e as a e prepereprivilege, allowed to 0 9 un. bt.jto lialxiloods, i i eich : esteehoeds were per-, tirrent t ; e-e- but wheuwch i31,30.110iA1:i nt, as here they were pot, ' l,i i wo rthy t.r ur Lila personal representativee, not I 4; 1:,57 were 83 press calumnies, though cetneie trim , ee a eeth of a Counsel, as if they had beee 1 , r e!haring Cross.. It ‘ ,was.„ his ditty ,10i a a kat to - prated the ehatatierief ca; ;, 'he elialleneed the Pleintiffto ; ,• - . •.~ '1 "her iret#;'W.ti t)f- 9# bet dew • AlMily.fuell who were strictly holKst, 110 that Stan hope:was tuathematicilly ivAnest, That Stanhope, . he was proud to call his tattier, If a grandson were seen to visit the vault where the remaius of his grandfather were deposited, and to scatter his ashes and bones about the grave, what must be thought of his piety and filial duly ? Would it not be said that , his conduct, had' been most ,undutiful and mu , it itn pious ? What appellation, then, did not that man deFerve who tore asunder his grandfather's fair fame, who scattered abroad his reputation, suffering it ,to become, nay, himself holding it forth as the sport of - every ealuumioiis tongue which chose to assail it ? His Lordship proceeded to call in question life other intrfs of the Decree, by which a releretfee was iftie to the Master as to the other-sales made by hit:, and as to waste. On .the latter point he ad dnced a variety_ of cases, from thA of Bowles, at law, in the year 1617, down to the case in equity, Pearce v, Pearce, to spew that a tenant for lite, with ont•impeachment of waste; more particularly ; that a tenant for lifeas he was, without impeachment of or for any manner of waste, was invested with equal powers as if he were tenant in tail. His Lordship concluded with hoping that his honour would as sign his reasons for adhering to his Decree, irhe chose to do so. - Mr. SCOTT, Counsel for the Earl, was about to proce , d, when Mr. RtcnAttos objcaed to it. • The. MAsTEw of the 11.01.1;s laid it down that. no .was entitl xl to be heard 'both by himself and his Counsel. He aught be heard, however) as 'a matter of favour. Earl SrAwitoee would acceptof no favour. • Mr. Ittcuratus declined saying: any thing for the Plaiotiff. He did not wish to allude to any of the refleOioni thrown by the Noble Lord on the Coun sel, and he •did not think that any thing new had' beemadduced on the merits of the case. , • The MASTER of the Roid.s saw no reason for al tering any 'part of his• Decree. He telt less relud ance in at once adopting this R , _:ss, ) ,ation, as his forming it could produce no irremediable iii;uty, an Appeal lying to a higher tribunal. • • The Decree was accordingly affirmed, with costs to the Trustees under the Pl4ntiti's Inarriaoe tract, but to none of the other parties. COURT OF KlNC's BENCH, MAY KNOWLES V. VYSS. Mr. PAak stated this to be atvadlion for money had and received by the Defenda:.t for the Plaintiff's use. The Defendantlept a &CLIO:at Lambeth ; was desirous of diiposing of it. The ain tiff agreed to purchase it , for one hundred ,and fifty Intuea3,— Mr. Toothead ; a setitioliissisfairt, teacher, of the classics, and -tdmoi4troccer, was en .,gsleed to nego!inte; and ..he J . nadc the bargain be kte,sql the prinies, Wrgahl „being coneluded, - Ihe 1 , 1 6jkt;ti gs. (being all the moues. lie ilia ttrJot to 'the Plaiotiti, 45 an eat,net to. bind the: This was about the end o 0-cember last. ioth of January fol.. ..lowiag, the Tilaintiti went to the Pelendent to pay the remainder, and to take iy.)sstn•sion of the school; btu, ~urpr4se, he, was told by the Defeudam, that he eApve.ted the eoirtrat to have been complet ed OW the ôtb of that month. That not ~hearing the •PlaintiT all din time, he had sold the • t.i.:oeol to a Mr.,Williatos, who was then 4) pot-' st2.6s,on of it. Well thec, the Pi4 - totiti wa n t e d tuck the money ‘sinclphe had lett a§ earnest,--No, that .he,should out have F . forit was forfeited, lor want of hid haVmg completed the comnitt lit time. So that the Plaintiff could neither hate the school not the , 'money ; ihat Mr.;Vaik submitted to be contrary to law ; .torif the contract did not go on, the money should tie returned'. to the Plaintiff, unless he had agreed that the money which : he advanced at "tlttl makitez the bargain should be eousidered as a ; lepo s i g , to be forieited at a given day, if the remainder was not paid ; Ind, therefore, this action was brought to recover back rhi,; money, as money had and received by the Defendant for ,the P10441;1'8 • use. Mr. Toothead proved the case, in substance •ac cording to this opeumg. Mr. GARItoW addressed the Court on behalf of Mr. Vyse; a-schoolmaster of - eminence, eVincecC by the spelling-hook which bers his 'namih a work more generally usetul, as well' as more ge4 , read, titan any uf• its 'day, except the Pilgrim's Progress. This gentleman had wish ed to retire from the , fatigue of governing and teaching untoward youth ; had determined to ie. fire ; sold his school - to the Defendant ; and the bargain Was to have been completed oh . the sth of 33nttty, ; and the money dspollo, was to havo , been forteited it' the bargain was not then fully completed. But the evidence carried the story no further than Mr. Toothead had stated it. The stlb stance of %% hicit wilS, that 401, ifs. was paid at 'the time of making the bargain, and that on the ;:oth of January fiAlowing Mr. Williams was' in possei . = aion of alg:soom. , Nothitii;' was proved about for feiting the deposit, r. Lord Et.t,lixnoitovGft,was dearly of opinion, that if there was do agyeetnent to forfeit the depwit, the lirg3in did nat go on between the Plaintitf and Defendant, it was a void bargain the tnotnent the. Defendant - had' made it impossible to complete it, by giving the school to anotlirr ; and theretore'the Plaintiff was entitled to recoi , er the money he bad deposited by way of earnest.—Ve t . dia. for the 'Plain • tiff.—Damages 491 94. . - trac>c Coi'DEN V TIOUL,i`ON. Mr. GrA4l.lo l .lr stated this to be an alit n at. Om suit nr,a telittuctablu tailor . in this town . against Mr. George Bottiton, a gentleman whom. he per , tinai:,y i;new and respeaeti,as he had no doubt the j y did, tur he was one; of the , most consider:lli:o ;. -033*- tt:rs ill the kingdotn.alis:Jaion Wttt. t ,t, iew ver a shalt !Atm indeed ; but th( . n the ac tion u.ras eiy in:par:apt to I. . ou,lit to feel themselves iitiktited ' ~r C(otoug ibrWara in this .• . some years ago, whir bi0n.. , 2,1i , 4 ,,,pr o pi e t ur of „-:. . ftirk4.-- . . %%due of = 'itt sent to Ins. :which in a pac6..et . ~ '~~ . _ ~ _. .. i ~ 'r ~~.. ~:I;~ , : • r . '~ . ' •ar s o the auutert, h a Aet rttr specirying the oonfents. All arrited ex:cept the rring and. the, broach and the Plaintiff lating 7 fo in .fornimi his sister, called at the office, where he 'was treated with an insolence ''Which required to be corre6ted, and which nobody would be more •ready,' to 'do than Mr. Boulton, when .he became properly informed of it. The Plaintiff, he said, having called to state that the contents of this parcel were lo3t,was told at the coach office, " Oh F you stole it your self." " No, that I have not what do you mean by that ?" Oh 1 . what then they have gutted it for you,-- have they ?" Then they laughed in his face. • It was to - check and clip the wings of this spe cies or impudence that this adtton was brought. It was clearly proved that - this parcel was left by the Plaintiff at the Defendanescoach-oftice, and that it arrived with all its contents except .the ring and the broach, which made it manifest that they were stolen out of -the parcel, Upon examining into the practice of booking parcels, -it appeared -to be much the habit of the people about these coach-offices to take the two-pence for booking, and to say to the person bringing it; " We will book it when we please.—we have something else to do besides attend ing' to your parcel." 'Lord ELLENtionotif;it oliServel, that this inSp-: lencP must be immediately correeted ; it was the trot - the book-beeper to hook every parcel in the presence of the person bringing it; and paying for the hooking, whose dial/ alio it was to see it done, 'to save the cirenitous.course of proving that the per son who took it was thccoachmaster's servant,which might otherwise be difficult, ,and sometimes, ,per. 7 haps impossible. Mr. l',uu for the- Defendant, disputed none of the tads; nor did headdress the - Jury, bittlut the . Matter upon a point oflaw—whether the Defendant was liable in this case for the less-of this parch 1, when there was stuck up in .his coach-office, in a conspictions place, a.board, - signifying that the pro prietors would net be answerable- for the loss of any parCel; however small, it it contained money, plate, or jewels. .• • Lord •ELLtictiotouoit, having observed the print ed bill of the coach-office, giving an aceoubt the coatihes that go from thence, and .giving the ~ u ,nal caution only;, that the proprietors would not be answerable for any parcel above the value of 51. unless entered and. paid for according, withoutton taioinehe e:tcepliup about jel,Vels, &o. was. clearly Of opinion that the printed bill controuled the circa of the board, and dispensed with lhe necessity of persons CoMing there with parcels reading. it, for that the printed bill of the office must be taken to Contain the'eonditnins on which business was done at the otlice,':and if these terms were inconvenient to- coach-masters; it behoved them to alter their bills, that the public might not be misguided. Mr. Bonito') Would do well to inquire into what hands this parcel catne in the Coach-office, and if he founA him out to charge him.with a felony. Something of this sort was much wanting, in places ofthis kind, for it might check the depredations of thieves, too Many of whom attend the' inn-yards: 'Verdict for the Plaiutiti—aamt!ges 11,125. WATKINS V. WILSON". • The Plaintiffs a tailor in London. The Defend.; ant, aged 17, is a Lieutenant ofthe Royal Marines; came up from Carmarthen with his lather, to go to Portsmouth to etubitrk, and did so. Bile at-Ports mouth, he sent for • some clothes, with which the Plaintiff' furnished him flO 141 LOndon , of 91. ifig. to the atuount The defence was infancy. The Plaintiff 'replied that they were neeess.iry. The Defendant's fa- . ther proved, that he cautioned the Plaintiff against trusting th e boy; who wanted nothing,. fur he watt stockers with clothes for a twelvemonth's voyage. Lord: kl.LENltottonOn thought as this youth w.ts not, in want of any thing, nothing could be necessary tor him and that the PlaintitYhaving had this notice 'not to trust the youth, ought to be held to the rigid rule of la kt , , which provided that no intalat should be answerithlelor thing - that was not ahsOlutay ne essarY.---"Vartlict for; Defendant. . . , • MAY 17. GOODE V. HILL. The Plaintiff and Defendant were both horse= deniers. The Defendant had' sold 'the Plaintiff a cart_ horse at. Croydon lair, which after some days fell off hi% feet and died of a consumption. The Plaintiff said he had only it grass cold. This atinin was brought upon Cie warranty. The witnesses for the Plaint:4f said, that the horse watt ill; t, the time it was sold. thinlte hit been ridden about the 'fair; and *Went home very well on the s ame evening and ate very he:wtily and was '..e1l 'far some days. T,he Plaintiff's witnesses also previniciited4 goed deal,'aft to the use that had been made of the 'horse after - the sale, and olie of therb, who .as a soft 'of partne.r with the Detendantodmitted that the'Plain. tiff had always kept verrfaithful to WS warranties..— Th e Plaintiff hod olsp made a different rspresenta lien in a letter to S itt. Delenditrit,,of a material fad, and.upun tltc Whole or the evidence, Lord • ELLEN - Botiou6n, being uloottion`witil the Defendant, the Plaintiff was nonstitted by con , ...ent, • OLD ILI/LEY. r tircurnstzneg of ttfel•prlsoners frailt4 legt tnir ings.iirr the purpose of vommitting .t robbery, and ko , ,t heir return with be isr.6pertyot th.e-proletf4. .1-le also conveyed the tittle-piece tot Le, 1)ou'oe cif the,. elder Ware, by the desire Of - 0;:lre. • .• Joel Ware,. ThOnias flohnit; alias I,acey, and; John Faller, were follnd guilty—Death; and David • Wire WM acquitted. him; was cotiviaed of stealing a watch and other property from 'JOhn M'Currnac, in April last,,, iu the parish of St. Gilds. - Pichaffi Watts was indi&ed - fo; stealing a slitep,'• the property of Wm. Matthew*, flout off Fuichley , Common, in April last. 'l'be prisoner was . the ser !ant of. Mr. Grimaldi, whO'has.a house in t!,iit v . t. , Cinity, and ofThred the skin of the -sheep stolen tiara ltaithews, with five others, for sale. Solue, fii,- picions having arisen, however,. front the: skins be ing cut - And disfigured`, the prisOner was taken up, when the prosecutor, along with several of licr 'per sons, identified the skins of sheep 'which they 'lost. l'he prisoner was tbood.gailty.—Death • Six other mdiaments were preferred against bilis% 13,tu being convided of .the first, they were with drawn. • , • T?:1 'WEDNESDAY, MAY 17. The ,Ses49ns commenced this thy, before.Tostices CRUSE AtitIPRAHAM. Joel Warr, Thomas Holin it, alias LotTy, and ip/in were capitally inclitted .for sburvia tionsly entered '-the. dwelling-house ;of Rich rd Jones, landlord of the Black Dog.publZe-house, at and'- stealing *therein 464 in half-penc.: anti penny.pieces, 'lel. - in gold,' ght one pound Bank notes,. two moaining ond'twa time pieees,l on the night of the 23d 01 April last':'" . It ap peared that the-prisortera had broken open the house with an iron' crow, and carried oft the property men tioned in the indi6tinent in a Whee.lbarrow . , Which was traced, from a track marked by the • Wheel, ,to a bowie in Ciabtree-row, Mile-end, where the pri soners were detetiett counting the Money. 'Some of the other articles stolen were likewise found in the rooms of the ptl4oners. bovid (Pale, the father of Joel Ware, %vat; alto indicted .for receiving a time-piece, part of the pro perty stolen, knowing it to be stolen. An Accomplice of the name of itatidallproved the • 13 (tw- 6 trcrt Pubilsi t ed by WILLIAM Ait M 1 G-C it SCRIPPS, Sotrth Molton-street, Grok."?itor-sqva'e* itentenis, Order.; for Ow Paper, Lettcrs for ti,e Editor, &c. (post-,taia JA 1 must be adatlzie4.. Sfi,lP NEU'S, 011AVISIND, MAY t 6. Sailed—the Imois, Walker, for Gibraltar; Patriot, Scv. Yetis. 4.:1i0, Marshall, Caledonia, Duhn, Aul,e, li , gg . '"'' . awl the Sin:4:lll3w, —, for Liebgelanti. '__......... BIRTHS. On the Sth inst. „Mts. Thomas -Willman, of St-lElll4'i' sttect, of twin Sous. On.uesda!, last. the Ludy of Captai» Robinson., the T• Royal Hoary Copew, High Wycombe, of 4 Soli anti bor., , . AMR RIAD. . Ou Tuesday the 16th inst. at Sittingbourne, in gent. bi the Rev. Mr. Pearce, Argle:: Bishop. Esq. M.ilt Dwilid And hanker, of Maidstot'e, to M4ry Atm, daugnter ,01:,..5,1- ward Brenchley, Esq. of iittingbourne. 006 — The same dale, I. Stevens. Esq. of Green -street, vennr-square, to Miss Tones, only daug,hter,of the hue 11 ' 4 ".. Inas longs, Esq. of Kingsland. place. - On Tuesday morning, at East Barnet, ;kir. William laYi of Whetstone Middlesex. to Elizabeth. youngest drughiet of the late ileLjainitt Bradbury, E.,41. ot.Richinund, SurieY• 1 DIED. - , • ... On her way to Bristol, for the bene fi t of her health, in tile ISth iyear o f het age, Miss Anna Riviercs, of excalpiiirr ofilspiety and brig . t: l o te r:i t tu o d r e lm: ii ll ic e i a a ri s i . ig , With: the utmost resig . t . ia tw i n ~ lung and painiut illness.. wh14.41,.1tas deprived socieil ct ‘)' c On 'Tuesday last, at Reading, in ,an advanced age, 4" Smart, widow of the late Mr. Christoptier Stnart, the ,or brated Poet; and on wham he wrote the Song, C alled " 4 lag Liss with the Golden Locks.'' Mrs. Smart was the Pro prietor of the Reading Newspaper, one of the Oldest and most reircashle of the Country lon mats, and she has a i ‘vays bacP highly esteemed fur ha litArality and benevolence. '' Dowl" On Wedn,:snay the loth inst. :It his sistet's, Lady ger SpenLer.s Louse,. in .lerinyo-street, the....Re . v. , Cha rleo Poynti, DD. It etior or :torch Creeek, near 13usliam, ot- folk, tand a Prebendary of Durham. Oa Motulay se'imight, at Naas, in the County of ICIAW' the Rev. I. j . Harrison. 0 0 y : t t h i e , I ttn 7 in . st.. at ,licighara.:(k.)use, Ikrksiiire,Wcilrio,il4ll: P 2 aged 6 An Smutty last, Daniel ,Garnault, EA. of Hull 's EOM, aged 36. ()it tile Nth inst.• at Poplar - Mr. Thomas M5ti1e.,),:1,..r,,,, On Monday last,. in Nortbll:-street, aged Ails' ' ' ll ' l , urral . wire of the Rev. Peter Debary, al llurtsborn r Hants. , , itat;srupcsarpacyei at a n xl r. a d x v i r li c i e4 y a , ge, n a ~r t hAisi,afjpeyrraiei;,trsiti,tcl ~,litoi Pagif. - bir. Niaitalay attirmied tier Nikita) , to Cffir L:uttatry• 1 ite sarni tlay, in his zist. year, Charles GtallAig, .00 yo:Jors.t son of 110: law Charles Graham, Esq. of FeuL:buft.:ll.• GUila.llo. Yesterday, at Claph a m , theinfaut son of Mr. S. C. Brart 4 dram. • he same day, in South Alltiley- Street, aged four port , T Emily, tour:h uauKhtsr of' inign Thomas, Esq. - el Rattan , in Sussex. Lately, at Cheshunt, Hertfordshire, Mrs. Margaret, 1.0. ton. , . fr' w "- •••1 " -- - -----!—,----- .. .. . TO 'l'. TA Y l.tig," -- "Surgeon, No. 9, •New hit-to-weer, ~ London.. slz, • Edinburgh, May a, 113( '''' Spring of 1794 I was alfliC,i.e4 ii -- i l!, 1 , 1 "e - venereal Complaint, which I treated. with in,'' " : ence for five months; onto=is hen obliged to allig .%') • virit regular Physician, wh p a temporary Stop to . t .„, knee of the Diseae (by mercurial aPpi..zations) loi:gc, . tiirie; but .growing, in spite or all Medicine ;Ind tlie.ativol Of the first Gentlemen of the Faculty here, worse an' weirse 'for tWes yerifS,' I was. reduced to a state ai1110,3 art' Far:dieted and beyond description, being an elitire,lever, and Wet:rat:4 from head tu foot, —t‘i y !lead, throat, moutnt r...t..:', legs, arms, &c: have been alternately In stange,,.;,. 6i...coming .usetesi ; in:short, I have had from twe 9 tY.,:: thirty ea ulcers on nay , body, and nearly totally 'kr - priycd of .sii,lit.---It would be %%Annul - ions •to particsivls ttze all t ny,caie s --SittEce - it to . say, there never w4s. or ' 1 ,, - win 136, ,on*,.of a More dangerous,illOre curaPno catc.t nature. I was ton looked upon by my fricodf' ll io. Imagined myself, beyond all h s qn s o f reco y,,yy; aria, ~,„ deed, in, my then . conaition, death was Neterable to ' c if, MOre than -miserable state. . lusthiL.-tttnadrul Sitinitient ,:,,, t drag a most , miserable eitistence, till Rivine Provoil-.4 threw in my Way a , Newspaper containillg. the COC.°_,I Mr. It: of Plyinnuth--7My tri,,ria, , , rt.t,i , l it, I COulii,Aot._,,,, E:reg I% scot and procured sorrit. of. Tour L. E A .K: F.'s i' (%. „,,t PI LI.S, which,. by itz,ing from tii , .e to tn;w, .n nov 4 : '',"; c . have long been,. a f ter:( mole ti + ------, --lan :our \ ca:i I:),le,sCaj ditteiil, in as ?pod a state of h....ii tit a, t.:','L:r I 011(1%.0i . 'ti„ proof of this, I had'a tine,' thrivii.4, I:,:ii".rhy 47iiiili , 61 , an ,, ,. tno a kw - Iltoittlts agfr. In gra t itt 04- to f.;; , c!, and in 'l' , ::, , of rendering my tellow-ercatitr;•.:.e: - ,:...,:, 1 IT,lnei.t ) I ''',:i - ..0 publiih this; and you may at anY tinie lifer p , -'l ,, L' i '%):i ' i , . wish robe SAti6tikui . of the truth Of tnis',' Or firrilia ~'• culars*, to use or my friends, by letter or Noon. - N O Att few CAWS tOr ba..iiii:bs ‘‘ i; 1 ,eve,L.4..,,,, m. ,,, , A nd '„ e(eced it, 'I have tront e;perience .•.....:.•,, r:::isui -t ilt 4 f ig a mankind,. that :in 'your I. EA 1 , ..P., I'll'. 1 . .. ii t ii..l .. i ' w oi',- , lu ' r*4 6", , sate, aunt "radical ,Clitc, !or the nros: .00, lul ca)ce u.. site:trte.V via :,l)l,;,;40., Iv j,.„„ ; 1 1 i s . : 4 1144,'‘ . , . • .. rzitate:Leg":4.- , '' lolFN'Tit i ): 'k' . I' • I l turpv. , untabic Jamily reasons prevent 1 ~ B O name and addr es s Public ; hat• creditable Per 3 " u ",.fa•r o • wa v,-itig infornution may also be referred to We : riends bY Nis'. - %';4 1 - clark', 'l4inusay-Citriiens;7•Friinub ~'.:, , .. Vre oared and liold, by rite Sole t toricrof , ,, ti l .; .00 111 T. TAY 1.0 ik, `eeniner.ol the Ro'. , ' I a.... _(7 olifgeo,p 4 , h: London, at his hatiSe, No. t * N'eni4trith;e: , it reet+- ke . Wrxre he will give - Aft tact 'wttluitat ''e'' 1 ., :e,' I'S 'l ii*l lt ' j ing these fills, and wit; answ,r,lxawatsior;'cr,------ law, paid, on tne saw:. t:erms, 0 b5.. : ;v14.4 i ii a li t ~,.:4 , ...t.s tP4 ac's ,, trotiolible .!(.3'eey, ?Ifs 'per,..,r.' idoi& (ire ' all, 11; 6 " I -l'o" 1117"tiunti, b" t ' 4 t' t'Acit u" .1 1.• arti;nhir requieitr, h? t ,,r0.1 ,. PnetAi r, "Uring thq entir , i'• of Noire tlari tirirtY . '"'''l l-r tnat he has h. j 4- '•, ` • „ ..,4el , A .c cottalts.'ttosot ita:ext,eiwY.- s. - -,,,,,- abo'..l Medicine, and the . practice arising triercra"„-,.e- TheY : are also 'sold by lii4 Appobtrinetit , fort lleisovr! genet of thole living at a ittblance ''',. by, ivi,r;,,, Wo". South-bridge, Edinburgh; Mr. NI acrkiilaitli Pria"' - ' '3f .0- SUW, to whom also Alr. T. reterii mitt, his a ddr‹t ; t , ... , • Perturner's, No.`3i, St. ii.lban's.rreet, 1%104' 13 , 1 , r . I)i , ' Robertaurirs Toy-trtop, No. to; Oiford,strect ; ',` ll , ,ttlo' borougn's, No. 7, 1:::.ii-:irreet.ditl'I. neatly-0pt"51",, Little nument -,- Mr. Steel's, 14)0k:it:Ili r, Nso. I, 0 111011.,k0‘, t to , 0 re, Tower-Mil ; Mi. Bull, -Damc,strece, Loublin ; an1,,,,h / r4an a person an . avert' • considerable - :toWn .in , Great - l i t 4 „ *- 0 WO' iselando in Boxes of only,. as. 9d. each, sealeiev.7,er Ss ( - full and plain direetiona, kvhereny per,:ony of ' 1 " . . N;' cure themselves With ease and k•Pcreey. tell ti ur W I N t 1; T'Sfa i r; i l e p r , Y Ot al Wi l li u e l h a , lyi:lr it4vtoulrir'iatrtil.l4s,,yril '':'''', sio“trs , is printsii, at ate Srarnpllict: .- . - N.. ti,:- Ntewlriiiste-strret,"'to imitatelVit ich 15 lei°llYl I" . all otaer:: ,ax• ctunrurtens .. ' • :,....:.....,................ ____'::-..........i.....e.r....1