The Sun. — London, England, 1836-11-03 00:00:00

PRICES OF IRISH STOCKS, DUBLIN, OCTOBER 29. 3 per Cent. Consols 87% ! Grand Canal Dcbs. 6 per cent. 89 Ditto Reduced -- -Ditto, 4 per cent — 3t.Z. per Cent. Stock 96 Hibernian Bank Ditto New, DUO 90% i City of Dublin Steam Co. $% per Cent. Debentures...—. 90% National Insurance Co — Bank Stock — City Debentures, 4 per cent... Royal Canal Stock — Ballast Office Debentures, 4 Grand Canal Stock 27% per cent Arrived. Due 0 America 0 Vrazil 0 EIiCSIOS A yre? 0 rarthazera 0 11:11,1ir... 1 Flanders 0 MAILS. Arrived. Due. Arrived. Due I France 0 0 Lisbon 0 0 Oucrii.&Jersay 0 0 Malta 0 Hamburg 0 0 Mexico 1 0 Holland 0 0 Ostend 0 0 Jamaica 0 0 Sweden 0 0 Leeward islands 0 1 Waterford 0 HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORROW. MAming I minutes after 10. I Evening '9 minutes after 10. Just Published, 2 vols. evo. 245. T WENTY YEARS IN RETIREMENT. By CAPTAIN BLAKISTON. " The author has made an exposition of his opinions on things in general and particular in a very lively and agreeable style, so as to fill two extremely amusing volumes."—Courier. " This work is the legitimate successor of the author's Twelve years' Military Adventure. Washington Irving might envy some of Captain Blackiston's lighter sketches, if haply not Miss Mitford herself."—Tait's Magazine. Printed and published by A. J. Valpy, M.A. Red Lion-court, Fl ee t-street, and sold by all Booksellers. HAMBURG, SEPT. 28, 18:36. 1 .1 4 UR Friends, and all those who may have to write 5 to us, are requested to be particular in directing, HEINE BROTHERS, in lIAMBURGH, and to observe, that a letter with one inelosure doubles the Postage on;v, but several inclosures would by far increase the same. Thus 10/:, 201., or 30!., for instance, if remitted in One Bank of Eng land Note would only cause double Postage, but 10/. remitted in two notes, would be liable to a much higher charge. It is there fore most advisable, for any Person having to remit Money to Ham burgh, to forward the amount in One Note; or having to receive Money from Hamburgh, to receive the same in One Note, when ever possible. Of course remittances from Hamburg'n to England, surpassing the usual amount of One Bank of England Note, may rather be made in Bills of Exchange, on London. To save expenses that may as well be avoided, we request our Cotrespondents not to overlook these particulars. HEINE BROTHERS. The publication of THE Su NEWSPAPER, commenced this day at 10 minutes past Three o' Clod. Zt'n , (flf fA , . di- 4,/ LONDON, THURSDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 3, 1836, No Sovereign in Europe is doomed to experience the dangers attendant upon Royalty in an equal de gree with the King of the FRENCH'. He can know no repose, for every day serves to demonstrate the num ber, the desperation, and the implacable spirit of his enemies. Here the Republicans arc plotting his de stiuction ; there the Royalists are preparing to wrest the sceptre from his tenacious grasp. The telegraphs work but to convey to the Minister of the Interior the ramification of plots ; and the Judges are almost con stantly engaged during their sittings in the condemna tion of intentional regicides. Under such circum stances the KING'S life must be to him a a state of inconceivable torture. The Members of the Royal Family most attached to him are doubtless equally miserable. We have been assured that the sufferings of the QUEEN and the Princess ADELAIDE, his MA JESTY'S sister, are indescribable. They do not enjoy a moment of waking confidence in the safety of the KING, save when his MAJESTY is immured in the recesses of the Palace. The great anxiety of the PRINCESS is said to affect her health and spirits, and to be really the cause of her present severe indisposition. Tire Paris Papers of Tuesday received this morning, are filled with accounts of the fortunate frustration of another Royalist conspiracy at Strasburg, which had for its object the placing of Prince Louis NAPO LEON BUONAPARTE, nephew of the EMPEROR, and son of the Ex-King of HOLLAND, on the Throne of France. The conspiracy broke out on the morning of the 30th ult., and from the small number of officers who attempted to carry it into effect, it would appear that the leaders placed the greatest reliance upon the disaffection of the army. The Journal du Haut et Bas Rhin treats the attempt as " mad and ridicu lous ;" but there is no reason to believe that the eight individuals seized as ringleaders were not the only portion of the French army who participated in the conspiracy. The PRINCE holds a Captain's commission in the Swiss artillery, and is reported to have recently fled from Italy, to escape being tried for the crime of assassina tion. This, however, may turn out to be a mere fabri cation. The following is the official account published in the Moniteur of Tuesday, the substance of which appeared in a Second Edition of The Sun of last night : TELEGRAPHIC DESPATCH. " STRASBURG, OCT. 30, HALF-PAST 8 O'CLOCK. ' THE GENERAL COMMANDING THE FIFTH MILITARY DIVISION TO TER MINISTER OF WAR. " This morning at 6 o'olock, Louis Napoleon, son of the Duchess of St. Leu, who had in his confidence the Colonel of Artillery Vaudrey, traversed the streets of Strasburg with a part of his (Vaudrey's) regiment, crying ' Vive Na poleon.' They presented th emse l ves a t t h e b arrac k o f th e 46th Regiment of the Lin e , i n or d er to exc i te t h e so ldi ers to rise. I myself was blockad e d i n my own h ouse by a picket of artillery, but, thanks to the fid e lit y an d s i ncere de votedness of our troops, this imprudent young man (Louis .Napoleon) was arrested, together with his accomplice. The so Regiment of Artillery is deserving of praise, as also are the Regiments of Infantry, and several officers of the 4th Regiment of Artillery." " The Council of Ministers assembled to-day at the Tuil eries. At 10 o'clock in the morning the Strasburg mail arrived. M. de franqueville, Aide-de-Camp of Lieutenant- General Voirol, commander of the sth Military Division, brought the subjoined report of the .General, which annou nces the immediate suppression of this criminal attempt : " Monsieur le Ministre,—My telegraphic despatch of this morning acquainted you with the culpable attempt of young Louis Napoleon Buonaparte to shake the fidelity of the troops of the garrison of Strasburg, and how that mad attempt had bceo defeated by the noble and courageous conduct of our soldiers. " This young man, accompanied by some adventurers, among wilom was Commander Parquin, dressed in the uniform of a General Officer, and guided by M. Vaudrey, Colonel of the 4th Regiment of Artillery, who, by his culpable manoeu vres, had induced a part of the sub. officers and soldiers of his regiment to follow him, presented himself to the authorities to try and seduce them, and after arresting the Prefect, caused 3lny hotel to be surrounded by the cannoniers. " A picket, commanded by M. Parquin, took possession of m y drawing-room ; but the loyal and brave cannoniers, attend ing,: to my voice and guided by sentiments of duty and honour, sun •ounded me, and having mounted my horse, I marched out with t hem, sword in hand, and proceeded to the Citadel, of w hielr I caused the drawbEidge to be raised, and where I knew ithful reement—the 16th of the line—which na„ j us t returned from the Camp of Compiegne. The brave sal&ers, r ecollecting our young Princes, rece i ve d me w ith cr : es o f Long live the King and evinc e d an ent h us i asm whi ch is only to be met with on the field of battle in the pre senc, of an enemy. This enthusiasm extended lik e an e l ec t r i c fi re to pll the corps of the garrison ; the cannoniers of the 4th , who bad for an instant obeyed the culpable orders of their Colonel, partook in the general feeling. " I entered the city at the head of the 16th Regiment of the Line, and marched to the Prefecture; but the Prefect had already been liberated, by the artillery officers I had sent to him. " During that time, Louis Napoleon, with Colonel •Vau. drey and a small number of still deluded soldiers, repaired to the barrack of Finckmatt, occupied by the brave 46th, and endeavoured in vain to seduce it from its duty. Lieutenant- Colonel Talandier, advised by my Aide-de-Camp, the chief of squadron de Franqueville, proceeded precipitately to Finck matt, where he found no difficulty in persuading his regiment that the men who attempted to shake their fidelity were de ceiving them. The brave Colonel Paillot, and all his officers, arrived immediately at Finckmatt. In an instant Louis Napo leon Bonaparte, and the miscreants who took part with him, were arrested, and the decorations they wore were torn from their breasts, by the soldiers of the 46th. " After I had marched them to the city prison, escorted by the 46th, and left that establishment under the protection of a strong guard, I went to the Place d'Armes, and reviewed the troops, who filed by, crying—' Long live the King l' and showed the enemies of our institutions bow much the King and country could rely on their fidelity and devotedness. " According to Colonel Vaudrey's statement, no one besides him and young Louis Buonaparte knew of their plans. Judi ciary proceedings have already commenced, all the military measures have been taken, and I can assure the Government that our soldiers will never allow their loyalty to be shaken, and that they will always prove themselves worthy of France and of King Louis Phillippe. " I am still so much moved, Sir, by what has just occurred, that I defer to another moment a more detailed account of this wild attempt, respecting which, however, my Aide-de-Camp, M. de Franqueville, will be able to inform you more fully. He will deliver to you this hastily-written despatch, and repairs post haste to Paris for that purpose. " My Aide-de-Camp has conducted himself in this matter most admirably. If he were not already possessed of old claims upon the favour of the King, I should endeavour to point out the value of those which he has acquired in this de plorable conjuncture. " In the universal enthusiasm which the whole garrison of Strasburg experienced to-day, many officers, sub-officers, and soldiers conducted themselves with true courage ; their fidelity as well as their energy have assisted me in triumphing over the insubordination which manifested itself in the 4th Regi ment of Artillery. I shall have the honour to communicate their names to you, and to solicit for them the rewards of which they have rendered themselves worthy. " I am, with respect, Sir, " Your very humble and obedient servant, " The Lieutenant-General commanding the sth Division, " VOIROL." The report of M. Choppin d'Arnouville, Prefect of the Lower Rhine, confirms all these facts, and adds that the popu lation of Strasburg has testified deep indignation. The authors of the sedition endeavoured, but in vain, to raise the popula tion ; not an inhabitant joined them, not one has been com promised with them. The ringleaders arrested are eight in number—namely, The Prince Napoleon Louis Bonaparte, 28 years of age, born at Paris. Parquin (Denis Charles), 49 years of age, officer of the Legion of Honour, domiciled at Paris. The Count de Gricourt (Raphael), 23 years of age, officer of ordnance of Louis Napoleon ; born at Paris, lodging at Strasburg, at the Hotel de la Fleur. Quevelles (Henry Richford Sigefroid), 25 years of age, officer of ordnance of the said Prince Louis, born at Neuvilier (Lower Rhine) residing' at Strasburg, Rue de la Fontaine, No 24. Vaudrey (Claude Nicholas), born at Dijon, 51 years of age, colonel of the 4th regiment of artillery, in garrison at Stras burg, and living in that city, in the Place St. Etienne. Laity (Francais Armand Rupert), born at L'Orient, 2.1 years of age, lieutenant of engineers, domiciled at Strasburg, Rue du Parchemin, No. 26. Boisson ( Antoine Marie Augustin), born at Pontarlier (Daubs), serjeant-major of the Bth battery of the 4th regiment of artillery. Bro (Eleonore), 28 years of age, belonging to the establish ment of the Queen Hortense. Justice is taking cognizance, and is active in seeking infor mation. The conduct of General Voirol, of the Prefect, of the autho rities, of the military commanders, and of the troops, is above all praise. We shall give, with the farther details which cannot fail to come, the names of the military persons who have deserved 1- warcL from the King. Madame Murat (cm-Queen of Naples, and sister of the Em peror Napoleon) has been ordered to quit Paris. Atelegraphic dispatch has been forwarded to Lyons, directing the General commanding that military division to march twelve regiments towards the Swiss frontier, the Government being afraid that a similar movement has taken place at Grenoble, influenced by the Swiss Radicals. The inhabitants of Strasburg took no part whatever in this affair. According to the report made by the Prefect they felt deeply indignant, as did the great bulk of the troops. The first intelligence reached the Government about midnight on Monday, when a Cabinet Council was called, at which the KING pre= sided, and which sat without interruption all night. The KING was at first greatly alarmed, but the arrival of General VotROL'S despatch, which we have inserted above, restored his MAJESTY'S confidence in the fidelity of the army. VOIROL behaved with great bravery as well as uncommon presence of mind. When the con spirators entered his apartment they found him getting out of bed. No sooner was their errand made known to him than he seized a pistol, which he levelled at PARQUIN'S head. It missed fire ; he drew his sword, and while preparing to defend himself to the last, harangued the gunners so successfully, that instead of obeying the leaders of the conspiracy, they turned round, and by command of the General, made them prisoners on the spot 1 Such bravery, and such amazing presence of mind, ought to be rewarded with a Marshal's baton. The alarm created by this strange attempt made no impression upon the Funds. Tuesday being the Fes tival of All Souls—which is kept as a holiday in all Catholic countries—the Bourse was closed. The good citizens of Paris may now rejoice—they have got something to talk about. PARIS, Nov. I.—The Duke of Nemours left Toulon for Bona on the 27th of October, on board the Sphynx steam boat. _ . . The holders of Spanish Stock are invited to repair to the Exchange to-morrow (Wednesday), for tho purpose of signing a petition to the King. We hare a letter from Cadiz, of the 17th of October, which says—" The French squadron from the Mediterranean has just entered this port. It consists of three ships of the line, and two brigs, besides two that have long been here, making in all a squadron of seven men-of-war. It is said there are others some leagues out at sea. Every body asks for what reason the Doctrinaire Ministry sends us this force ? The aversion which it has manifested to the present Constitutional system makes us fear that this force is intended to support some sinis ter project ; the more so as all the Spanish Generals seem to agree in this project; for it seems that they have received or ders not to beat Gomez. Thus this column may traverse Spain without fearing to meet with any obstacles, unless it be the heroism of some towns, such as Requena. The propaga tion of this suspicion among the people, even should it be false, will suffice to produce new and terrible effects." The price of bread at Paris has been raised to 12 sous for the loaf of 41bs. of the best quality, and 9 sous the second quality.— The National, Nov. 1. BELGIAN / UNDS—Bausans, Ocr. 32 Actual Debt, 21,:, per Cent. Rothschild's Loan, 5 per Cent. lOO Loan of Thirty Millions 92% Loan of City, 1532, 4 per Cent lOO Society of Commerce, 44 per Cent 14334 • Bank of Belgium, 5 per Cent 12.1% —Brussels Papers, Nov. 1. AUSTRIAN FUNDS.—VIINNA, ocr. 21. Five per Cents. Metalliques Four per Cents. Three per Cents. Bank Sharee 1246 —Allgemeins Zeitung, Oct. 29. The Times of this morning speaks confidently of the capture of Bilboa by the Carlists. According to our Contemporary, the siege of that place has been undertaken to keep the muskets of the Pretender's troops from rusting—nothing more. " Should the Prince (i. e., Don CARLOS), remain in the Pro vinces," writes the oracle of Printing-house-square, " and having re-organised the bands in the Asturias and Catalonia, make a combined movement the next year, it is thought that nothing could resist his pro gress. In the mean time he must employ his army in someway. Hence the attack on Bilboa has been re solved littlerl is upon, ts , 9f is of the success which there can be but doubt." Thus the siege of Bilboa , by the Ca a mere pastime on the part of these reno wne d warriors. a w a y O o f n c t o b u e rs 2 e 9 , t even the Times —with a 'D c consistency to be only matched ac counts for th e i r by its want of principle —asserts in another column that the Carlist heroes did run with all their might, upon learning that General ESPARTERO was ap proaching at the head of his division. But it op -pears that Bilboa will not allow itself to be taken in jest by EGUIA. The Carlists must lay siege to it in earnest before they can hope to make themselves masters of it. Our Contemporary proves, by his own columns, that there not only exists great doubts of the success of the Carlist attack upon Bilboa, but there is a positive certainty of its total failure. We copy from our Contemporary the telegraphic despatch to that effect, published by the French Government : " BAYONNE, OCT. 31, Half-past Three o'clock in the Afternoon. _ " The Carlists raised the siege of Bilboa on the 29th inst., at the approach of Espartero. Eguia is marching against him." Had the Carlists made themselves masters of the two forts, as stated by the Times, and had the capture of Bilboa been so unworthy of a serious thought, EGUIA might have remained where he was, and waited quietly the arrival of ESPARTERO. But the fact is, that if ESPARTERO appeared in that district at all (which we rather doubt), EGUIA preferred a retreat into the mountains, to the prospect of encountering him. In the same article the Times makes a furious at tack upon the character of General EVANS and the British Legion. "Of the force under General EvANs," says the Times, "it is difficult to speak with any degree of calmness. Distrusted and hated by the Christinos, they are—we scarcely know how to write the word—despised by the Carlists. Yes I it is a fact which we are enabled to state on indisputable authority, that the Carlist forces entertain no fear of the British Legion, while of the French troops they have the greatest dread." A more base, cowardly, and atrocious calumny than this never was uttered. The Carlists dread the French troops indeed, and en tertain no feat of the British Legion I Where fore should the Carlists fear the French ? What have they done to inspire terror since the com mencement of the present struggle ? And if the Carlists do not fear the Legion, why do they run from it ? Why did they suffer themselves to be beaten in every engagement which they ever yet had with our countrymen ? Wherefore did they not conquer instead of allowing themselves to be conquered in the actions of the sth of May and Ist of October ? Or why do they not drive the Legion out of San Sebastian ? But our Contemporary is not ignorant of the fact, that the Carlists dread the Legion and its brave com mander—that Don CARLOS dreads it—and that the Spanish Liberals regard it as the link which connects their country with Great Britain. Such malignant slanders will only cover with contempt those who are so shameless as to give them circulation. The Moniteur of Tuesday likewise contains the following important despatch from Bayonne, dated October the 31st, eleven o'clock A.M. : " A private letter from Madrid, of the date of the 29th, announces that an extraordinary courier has brought there in telligence that Alaix has taken from Gomez 1,200 foot sol diers, two squadrons of cavalry, and two mountain-guns, be tween Pozobliinco and Montoco." This news is very important, if true. We look for ward with some anxiety to the next arrivals from Madrid. The majority of the Committee appointed by the Swiss Diet to take into consideration the differences between the Republic and France, have recommended the adoption of the following note in answer to the note presented to the Directory by the French Am bassador : " France and Switzerland, united for centuries, see this harmony compromised by a mistake. Both States ought to desire to see their ancient relations restored. As the differ ence proceeded from mistake, categorical and loyal explana tions—the only diplomatic language of Switzerland—ought to be the only means of terminating the quarrel. " In the note of September the 27th the French Govern ment complained of the course adopted relative to Conseil. Before the Diet could make any communication on the subject the relations between the two countries were interrupted by order of the French Government. Switzerland saw this with more pain from its never having been its intention to cause the interruption of friendship between the two countries. The Diet had reason to be offended at the Due de Montebello's note withdrawing his communication of the 19th of July, when it was known that Conseil was but an adventurer. But it had never the idea of offending either the Government or the Am bassador of France. The Diet had no idea of addressing to the French Government the report of its commission, vhich was merely an affair between the Diet and its commissaries, and which contained two opinions, that of the majority and that of the minority. But it should have been guilty of disrespect to the French Government in not placing before it the docu ments calculated to enlighten its justice. The execution of the decree to communicate these documents depended, of couse, on the will of France, and since she refuses, the Diet v, ill take no further steps in the affair. The note of M. de Montebello contains grave errors respecting the internal state of Switzerland. The Diet, inviting the publicity of the na tional life without mystery, can repel by facts these unjust and unfounded allegations, and would find proofs in the social con stitution of the cantons, as well as in their material and moral condition. But it cannot enter into such discussions, the Diet not allowing the right of any foreign nation to criticise its institutions, and control the march of its Government. Finally, the Diet hopes that by these explanations the amicable relations between Switzerland and France, cemented by time and circumstances, will be restored." M. Tscharner, as minority, presented another project of reply, applauding the Directory for not having obeyed the de cree of the Diet to communicate the documents about Con seil, regretting the cause of offence, and hoping that amicable relations may be restored ; regrets the false opinion which the French Government entertains of Switzerland, and acknow ledges no right control. Two more Reform dinners have been given within the last week—one to Lord GLENELG at Inverness, and the other to Mr. STEUART, at ,Jedburgh• Both were well attended, and at both the speeches were ad mirable. Lord GLENELG ridiculed, in a very happy manner, the attempts of the Conservatives to show that the state of prosperity which the country has en joyed, with but little intermission, for four years and upwards, was not so much to be attributed to the mea sures of Government as to the effects of " accident ;" and then proceeded to expatiate on the extraordinary difficulties under which Ministers have long laboured, and still continue to labour, in their efforts to carry on Reform. We grant that they have many and serious obstacles to contend against, but know of none so overwhelming, that resolution and perseverance cannot subdue. Let them, instead of making constant allusions to the difficulties that beset them at every step of their progress—which they are but too prone to do—put their shoulders to the wheel, and we will answer for their success. When NAPO LEON first projected his passage of the Alps, he did not expatiate on the difficulties of such a passage, or allow himself or his troops to entertain a doubt of its practicability : not so ; he went at once to work ; and in just such a prompt and decided spirit must Minis ters act, if they hope to achieve the triumph of Re form. To be incessantly dwelling on one's difficulties, is at length to be overcome by them. Anticipate failure, and you will assuredly fail ; but make up your mind to success, and the odds are ten to one in your favour. We throw out these remarks, because we have perceived of late, at many of the Reform dinners, far too much stress laid on the difficulties against which Ministers have to struggle. Mr. SPRING RICE at Limerick was specially diffuse on this point ; and Lord GLENELG at Inverness dwells on it at nearly equal length. Now, this is injudicious ; first, because it betrays a lurking apprehension of future failure ; and, secondly, because it is drawing rather too largely on the sympathies of the people. Henceforth, we trust that Ministers, or those who speak their sentiments, will tell us rather what they are resolved to do, than what they are apprehensive they shall not be able to do ; place before us the sunny, instead of the shady side of the question ; or if they must needs make allusion to their difficulties, do so in a bold and confident, ra ther than in a whining or distrustful spirit. Resolu tion only is necessary to insure them a triumph. They have abundant means at their command. The Court may be against them—and the House of Lords may be against them ; but the intelligent, influential mass of the community is with them ; and here is a moral power more than sufficient to neutralize all the efforts of their opponents. Alluding to the future progress of Reform, Lord ENELG observed that he was con fid ent o f i ts suc cess, because he believed in " the mortality of injustice, This is well said, butand ittheisuilituhtnabtue tri ldu u r mp e h xp o l f ic t i t t u e t u h u : u ' gh. 'We all know that injustice is mortal ; but we know also that it is apt to live a very long time ; and are we to wait, there fore, until, having numbered the years of METHU SALEM, it may be pleased to give up the ghost ? Are we to leave it to the natural tendency of " truth" ulti mately (GOD knows when 1) to remedy " injustice ;" ' or apply the remedy ourselves, without loss of time ? Unquestionably we ourselves should set to work, and leave as little as possible to the " Chapter of Acci dents"—which, to say the best of it, is but a chapter of caprices, and rarely fails to play tricks with those who lay too much stress upon it. Lord GLENELG'S " ultimate triumph" reminds us of Mr. SPRING RICE'S " sooner or later"—phrases borrowed from a Tory vocabulary, and which, like a general criticism, or a general invitation to dinner, have no positive meaning, nor are intended to have any. If we except these few slips, his Lordship's speech was just such as we were prepared to expect. It was frank, and even cordial in its tone—qualifications not usually to be met with in the speeches of a Cabinet Minister. We may accord similar praise to Mr. STEUART'S address to his constituents at Jedburgh. True, he did not express himself decidedly in favour of Peerage Reform ; nevertheless, he laid the " cat" on their Lordship's backs, in very handsome, drummer-boy style. He would give them just one more trial, he said. So would not we. They have been tried four times already, and four times have been convicted. We press, therefore, for the sentence of the Court upon them. Mr. STEUART very properly observed that no man with an ounce of brains in his cranium, could trust the Conservatives ; for that they were the same men who but the other day took office, as Reformers, and were now stirring heaven and earth to oppose the progress of Reform. Yes, and not only this, but they are ac tually retrograding from their Tamworth Manifesto, which, insufficient as it was, yet promised much more than the Tories will now venture to give. We are now more than ever persuaded that these men, if they could once have securely fixed themselves in the sad dle, would have backed out of every pledge they made on entering office. Did not their Manifesto hold out something like a hope of redress to Ireland, and has not their conduct last session wholly falsified that pledge ? Did they not tell us they were Re formers, and does not their language now convince us that they are just the reverse ? It is now only that we see them in their proper colours. Now they are sincere. Before they were hypocritical. Let us es timate them therefore with reference to their present, not to their past, language ; and give them all dile praise for their candour, when they tell us—as they make a point of doing at all their feeds—that Reform has attained its ultimatum. The Halifax Tories, determined not to be behind hand with their neighbours, gave a feed on Monday to the gentleman, who, even by his own account, is any thing but a faithful representative of them and their interests in Parliament. The object for which this small knot of the factious gathered themselves together was of course to propagate among the silly and un thinking the delusion that re-action and guzzling are one and the same thing—a proposition which may pass current among Tories, but nowhere else. Two gentlemen spoke on this occasion,—at least we find only two speeches in the Morning Post, and therefore we take it for granted, that either no others were delivered, or, if delivered, were unworthy of being reported. We think the first of these conjectures nearest the truth ; for had there been any others, we cannot conceive it possible that our Contemporary would have selected for publication such common place trash as that which constitutes the staple of the effusions which escaped from Lord WHARNCLIFFE and his son. Two Inure feeble or more futile attempts to assail the Government and its measures, than those of the Noble and semi-Noble Persons we have men tioned, were, we verily believe, never made. There is, indeed, particularly in the twaddle of the Peer, abun dance of abuse—prolix and pointless vituperation is drivelled out by the gallon—the stale objections which have been a thousand times brought forward, and as often answered, are hashed up anew, without any other seasoning than clots of the dullest and most vulgar malignity. Mr. WORTLEY, in his endeavours to lighten the burden of that odium which rests upon the Tory Lords for their monstrous treatment of Ireland, tells his hearers that he has been in Ireland, and can safely say that " there is not a valuable institution which Eng land has which Ireland is deprived of." Now look at the stupidity of this man, who under takes to advocate the perverse wickednesss of the Lords I Allowing his assertion to be true, which it is not, what shall be said of that assembly which, by a solemn decision, swept away the whole Corporations of Ireland? Are not,Corporations considered in Eng land valuable Institutions ? Here, then, does the House of Lords stand condemned by its own foolish defender of destroying a whole class of the most valu able Institutions in the British Empire ? There is one, and only one point in Lord WHARN CUTER'S speech which we think worth the least no tice. The Noble Lord remarks that " the House of Lords have a power, bequeathed to them by their ancestors, of legislating without election." Now p did it never occur to Lord WHARNCLIFFE that this is ra ther dangerous ground to occuy in the nineteenth cen tury ? May we not inquire who gave their ancestors the right to bequeath this power—who gave a dozen of barbarians in the eleventh century a right to influenck, the destinies and the happiness of twenty-five millions of Britons, many centuries after the said barbarians were rotten in their graves ? If the Peers can ad vance no better reasons for their legislative privileges than the tenure they hold from such ancestors, their case is much more deplorable than we had any idea of, and they had better lose no time in " setting their House in order." THE FUNDS.-(THIS DAY.) CITY, 7'WELTE O'CLOCK. We have received the Journal du Commerce of the Ist, bringing the prices from Amsterdam of the 29th Oct. Five per Cents., 1001 ; Three per Cents., 53 ; Ardoin's Spanish, 17 15 16. No political news of importance in the above papers. We have very few arrivals, but the express from Paris this morning is both interesting and important. It brings the details of a conspiracy formed at Strasburg, by Prince Louis Bonaparte, aged 28 years, in conjunction with seve ral officers in the service of the King of the French, to bring about a counter-revolution, but they failed in its exe cution and were arrested. It also announces the raising of the siege of Bilboa, and that the Carlist army had gone to meet that of the Queen, which was approaching Bilboa. battle was expected between the contending forces. Up to the present time the above events have not had any effect on the various funds. Spanish Active, which closed yesterday at 191 ex-dividend, opened at 191 to 20 ; Passive, 51 ; Deferred, 8} 1 ; Portuguese, 551- ; Three per Cents., 35} 1 ; Colombian, 221 ; Mexican, 22i ; Dutch Two-and-a-Half per Cents., 53i The information received from Andalusia states that Gomez has retreated into the Sierra Morena. HALF-PAST Ol!E. Consols which opened this morning at 881 for the Account, have since improved to 88k 89 ; for Money the same. Exchequer Bills, 11d. 1 3 discount ; Exchequer Bills, 2d. par ; India Bonds, 3 premium ; Bank Stock, 205 k ; India Stock, 256. In the Foreign Market Spanish Active improved from 191 20 to 20i- 4 ; Passive 5 ; Deferred, 81 ; Portu guese, 551 ; Three per Cents., 34 ; Colombian, 221 ; Mexican, 221 ; Dutch 21 per Cents., 54. The raising of the siege of Bilboa by the Carlists is not generally credited in the city, owing to the telegraphic in formation having so often deceived the public, therefore the speculators in Spanish Bonds are anxiously waiting the arrivals of to-morrow's express from Paris ; the well-in formed, to the contrary, look upon it to be an official CO3 firmation. THREE 0' CL 0 CEI Consols for the Account, asi PRICES OF STOCKS THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK. Bank Stock. 205 % India Stock 256% 6 3 per Cent. Red. 6734% S Ditto Bonds 3 per Cent. Cons. 88%1 , ,, 9 South Sea Stock - 3%, per Cent.... ..... ~..............97 6% Old Annuities — Ditto Red. 96%% t New Ditto — New 3% per Cent 973 8 7%13 per Cent. Annuities, 1751... New 3 per Cent - \ Exch. Bills, Ll,OO O ...... .. par 2 pm. Bank Long Annuities to expire Ditto 500 — pm. Jan 5, 'B6O 14 11-16 t Ditto Small Oct. 10, 1850 14 7-16 9-16 ' Ditto Commercial . Jan. 5. 1860....... ........... 14 15-16 Ditto Advertised - pm. Jan. 5, 1880.... - !Bank Stock for Acc0unt........ - Amil 5, 1880 - ' India Stock for Account Jan. 5, 1870 Omnium --pm. 1 PRICES OF FOREIGN FUNDS Austrian Bonds —l Belgian Bonds ............ .... ICO THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK. Peruvian Bonds — Ditto Account „.„ .......... ,_ _ Portuguese 80nd5...„„ Ditto Account — Ditto New Bonds Ditto Account 55 304 Ditto, 3 per cent. 35% 6 -;..n Bc account.Lstto ........ Brazilian Bonds. Ditto Account Buenos Ayres Bonds Ditto A'ecount Chillian Bonds - Ditto Account Columbian Bonds Ditto Account Columbian Bonds, Ifit - .).4 2 2 14 Ditto Account ........ Danish Bonds Prussian Bonds Russian Bonds, 18'2'1 l .O Ditto Account Ditto Metallic Spanish Bonds Ditto Account Ditto Bonds, 18134... 1934 N 20 1 1( Ditto Account 20 10% 20% French, 5 per cent..........105f. 25c. —4 per cent. —f. —c. Ditto Account Greek Bonds Ditto Bonds, N'.25 Ditto Account Mexican Bonds, 5 per cent — Ditto Account Ditto, 6 per cent. 22% Ditto Account NAapolitan 2 per cent. —f. —c. Exchange 25 r. 40.. Dutch, 24 per cent. ...53U 4 3% 4 Ditto Account 53N 4 Ditto, 5 per cent loov, Ditto Account lOO PRICES OF SHARES THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK. Paid. Per Share. Eastern Counties Railway I 0% gig Great Western Railway Company 3O 41 1 ,E IN Brighton ( Rennie's) London and Southampton Railway Company Manchester and Leeds Railway Company Manchester South Union Railway Company' 2 3 THE SUN, LONDON, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1836. CHANCERY COURT.-(THIS DAY.) ROCHESTER CHARITY. This was the petition of John Batten, Wm. Nicholls, Edward Boyle, and several other persons, who formed part of the individuals who had been nominated as Town Coun cillors of Rochester, praying that the report of the Master of the 20th of September might not be confirmed, and that it might be referred back to him to review his report. From the statements in the p e titi o n it appeared that in August last a petition was presented on the behalf of nine of the nominated Town Councillors of Rochester, opposed in politics to the petitioners, praying that they might be at liberty to go in before the Master for the purpose of nominating seventeen individuals as trustees of the different charities held by the Corporation of Rochester. The prayer of that petition was granted, and the parties went in before the Master, and nominated seventeen indivi duals, whose politics were totally at variance with those of the petitioners, as trustees. No notice of these proceedings had been given to the petitioners, otherwise they would have appeared in the Master's office to oppose the nomination. The Master made his report, approving of the individuals proposed, and for the purpose of preventing the confirmation of that report, the present petition was presented. Mr. ANDERSON, who appeared in support of the petition, said that the town of Rochester was most unfortunately situated, it being in effect without a Mayor or Town Council, the parties nominated to that office being equally divided as to politics. One section of the Town Council totally op posed to the petitioners had procured the approval of the Master of seventeen individuals of their own way of thinking in politics. This nomination the Learned Counsel submitted was unfair and improper, and the Court would not allow it to stand. The LORD CHANCELLOR said he could not consider it a fair objection to a party being a trustee, that he held cer t ain political opinions. Mr. ANDERSON submitted that there ought to be a proper infusion of both parties ; here, however ; every gen tleman entertained not only particular political opinions, but were decided partizans. Mr. BLUNT, who appeared to oppose the petition, ob jected to its proceeding further at present, as he had not seen the affidavit in support of the petition which had been filed to-day. The case was then ordered to stand over for a week. ROLLS' COURT-(THIS DAY.) THELLUSSON V. WOODFORD. Mr. PEMBERTON stated that this case now came before the Court upon the petition of Lord Rendlesham, which prayed for a reference to the Master, to inquire whether a purchase the petitioner proposed to make on account of the trusts of the Rendlesham estate was a fit and proper pur chase, and if it was, then that the Master might investigate the title.—Reference directed. DE CRESPIGNY V. WINDSOR. This was a petition praying for a reference to the Mas ter, to inquire into the propriety of an increased mainte nance for the infant plaintiff, Lord De Crespigny, on ac count of his going to the University.—Ordered. The remaining unopposed petitions occupied the Court up to the time of our going to press. VICE-CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.) CONTEMPT.-RACHEL V. RACHEL. Mr. SHARPE applied in this case under the statute, that an appearance might be put in for the defendant, who was in custody of the Messenger ; and also that he might be turned over to the Fleet for contempt for not having put in that appearance. After the COURT had made the order, Mr. SHARPZ requested his Honour to say a few words to the prisoner, to convince him if he could that the course he was adopting was wrong. As he was the eldest son, nobody could persuade him that he was not entitled to cer tain property left by his father, as against his other brothers. The VICE-CHANCELLOR enquired if the father had made a will ? Mr. SHARPE replied that he had, but notwithstanding that the defendant persisted in his right to the property, and, as was usual in cases where relations were opposed to each other, the greatest animosity prevailed. The VICE-CHANCELLOR said, if such was the dispo sition of the defendant, all he could say to him, he was afraid, would have little or no effect ; his better way would be to have legal advice upon the subject. The Messenger who took the defendant into custody, said that he was certain it was not in his power to employ Counsel, as he was in the most abject state of poverty. Mr. SHARPE said the suit altogether was a pauper's suit. Mr. L. IVIGRAm was most ready to advise the defendant as to the best course for him to adopt, and this being agreed to, the papers in the case were handed over to the Learned Gentleman. KING'S BENCH.-(THIS DAY.) (SITTINGS IN BANCO.) At the sitting of the Court a new Order was read, di recting that, from and after the last day of the present Term, all orders of Sheriffs, other than the Sheriffs of Lon don or Middlesex, to return writs of any description, either of mesne or final process, to bring up the bodies of defend ants, all rules be eight day rules, instead of six day rules. THOMAS V. JONES. Mr. ALEXANDER moved, in this case, for a rule to show cause why the defendant should not render an account to the plaintiff of all rents received by him, all distresses made upon his property, and any balance remaining in his hands, after payment of the amount of three executions upon the plaintiff's property, and that the case be referred to the Master, in order that any overplus should be refunded to the plaintiff. The defendant Jones, who was an attorney, entered three executions on the property of Thomas, amounting in the gross to 8001., and it appeared from the affidavits of Thomas and his tenants, than that sum had been paid to Jones, who still retained possession of the pro perty, by which the tenants were prevented paying their rents to the rightful owner. Mr. Justice PATTESON—There seems to be a case in 3d Barnwell and Cresswell, in which the Court granted such a rule.—Rule granted. THE KING V. THE GUARDIANS OF THE POOR OF THE PARISH OF ST. PANCRAS. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL moved for a rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue, directed to the Guardians of the Poor of the parish of St. Pancras, appointed under the provisions of the Poor Law Amend ment Act, requiring them to obey an order of the Poor Law Commissioners, dated 9th July, 1836. It would ap pear that the defendants were determined to act in open defiance of the law. Their Lordships were aware that by the Poor Law Amendment Act the Commissioners had a right either to put together a number of parishes in a Union, and direct the manner in which the poor of that Union should be maintained ; or if the parish be populous, they may direct the poor to be maintained separately by that parish. The parish of St. Pancras being very large, the Commissioners determined that it should be a district in itself, and therefore they intimated that the Guardians should be chosen by the rate-payers for the management of the affairs of the poor. The Poor Law Amendment Act provides that the Guardians should be elected by the rate payers, and then the former administer the affairs of the poor. In the parish of St. Pancras they had a local Act of Parliament, according to which Directors were appointed by the Vestry, and these Directors had the manage ment of the affairs of the poor, and it was suggested that the Poor Law Amendment. Act did not apply to this parish, and a strong disposition on the part of the Directors to maintain the power they had hitherto legally enjoyed. The Directors therefore suggested that the opinion of three gentlemen of the bar (the Attorney and Solicitor-General, and Sir William Follett) should be had upon the matter, and they gave it as their opinion that the Poor Law Amendment Act did extend to the parish of St. Pancras. However, the determination to resist its operation still con tinued. The Poor Law Commissioners issued an order to the rate-payers to elect Guardians of the Poor, and the rate payers met accordingly, and elected Guardians, most of whom had bean Directors under the local Act. The Commis sioners then issued the order, upon which the present appli cation was grounded, dated 9th July, 1836, directing the Guardians to meet upon a given day, and elect a chairman. The Guardians did meet, and intimated an opinion that the Poor Law Amendment Act did not extend to their pa rish, and said that they would not obey the order of the Poor Law Commissioners. Although he (the Attorney- General) did not suppose there was anything contumacious in the conduct of the parish authorities, and that they were merely desirous of having the question decided in a superior Court, still, as nothing further had been done, he felt it his duty to make the present application. COURT—Take a rule. BAIL COURT. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE sat in this Court this morning for the purpose of hearing motions. NOVEL APPLICATION. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL applied to the Court for a rule calling upon a Mr. Walters, an attorney of the Court, to show cause why he should not be struck off the roll. He was happy to state that the application was not made in consequence of any misconduct on the part of Mr. W., but owing to his having, while under articles of clerk ship, devoted a considerable portion of his time and atten tion to the management and conducting of a colliery. The affidavits on which he grounded his application set forth that in the year 1830 Mr. W. was articled to a Mr. Jones, a solicitor at Swansea, and that while under articles, namely in the year 1831, he was appointed by his father the mana ger and conductor of a c o lli e ry, at a distance of eight miles from Swansea, at a salary of 1001. a-year, where he at. tended daily, kept the accounts, paid the men, &c., &c, He (the Attorney-General) submitted to the Court that such attendance at the colliery prevented him from attend ing to the business of the gentleman to whom w as under articles, with the diligence and attention ,wh i ch the rules of the Court required, and that , theref?re,. on justice and fairness to the profession at large , the applicati he made to the Court ought to be granted. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE—DO your affidavits state that he was absent from the office of the gentleman to whom he was articled one whole year ? The ATTORNEY..GENERAL NO, my Lord, but they state that he attended daily at the colliery , and kept the accounts there, &c. Mr. Justice LITLLEDALE—He might have done than during his leisure hours. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL—He had to go a distance eight miles to the colliery. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE—YOU may tak e a rule Nisi. Mr. si' After disposing of several other motions t points of practice only, the Court sat at Nisi Prius to try Common Jury causes. • COMMON PLEAS.-(THIS DAY.) DAVIS V. CURTIS. in priren na more than twelve months for a debt not exceed in g 20/. Adlirs.chSaerrggeeatnhteAdNenfeanEdwanst,ahppolihedaviinngthbiseecnase for a rule to discharge the defendant ) he having been in pri!Ofl for the o L . I e I a e c d . I S 7 e , r g h e e a w n t a t s h o e o r t e i f t o l r e e d contended that by t he. H e e 4 3 . 811 t a h a in his hand the affidavit of the prisoner, stat in g the tour; of his imprisonment and the amount of the debt. He! mitted to the Court that, inasmuch as the statute-book;_ t r e ec rm ted of t i h m e p d ri i s s o ch n a m r e g o e t, of al t t h h e ou p g ri h so h n e er m a i f g t h e t r not suff e h r a in v g e c a o c ni er ptie D a_ with the rules and orders of the Court, or given not ice, . De prisoner could not suffer by such proceeding, but the 32 tt discharged absolutely. d of Mr. MAUNSELL submitted, that by George 111. the prisoner was bound to deliverl:; his schedule before he could be discharg ed. order of the Court of the 12th of April had been obtain; , ; 0 9 directing the prisoner to deliver up a schedule w itbi° days. The prisoner had not done so, and the 60 &I d had expired, so that if he were now to be dischargela under the 48th George 111., the order of the Court alters be mere waste paper, and the just claims of the cre would be defeated. Mr. Sergeant ANDREWS contended that the prisoner W. 1.: not bound to make a schedule, as he was no longer wit u b l , the jurisdiction of the Court, but he was entitled to an solute discharge. Mr. Baron PARKE, before whom the applicati °n d made, said it was one of so much importance, that he vs:',"°o consult the other Judges before he would give any 000 upon it. The Learned JUDGE left the Court for a short time, ° a d when the Lord Chief Justice and the other Judg es ha taken their seats the case was resumed. Mr. Sergeant ANDREWS again st a ted the facts of the case and produced the affidavit of the prisoner. 11° 3 ! ) :. prehen , ded that the moment the twelve months hadlem pired, the prisoner was entitled to his discharge. ner words of the clause in the Act were—that every Pris°',"th charged in execution in pursuance of this Act (the the4o Geo. III.) shall be brought before the Court, no d der Court shall, on the expiration of the notice afores,aid, °r such prisoner to be discharged. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE said that the question r* whether a party remaining in custody w a s w ithin the ma s ing of the clause still charged in execution ? It wet question of some importance, and one upon which the r e. °os great doubt. Dri• Mr. Sergeant ANDREWS contended th a t legally the, 'for toner was not now in custody. The rul e now sour ° t of would have been applied for last term, but as the terra ot twelve months had not then elapsed, the prisoner could ° avail himself of the statute. hot The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE—The prisoner migh t . as made an assignment. This turned the tables u pon bg ° ' far as the equity of the proceeding was concerned. h a ve Mr. Baron VAUGHA N th oug ht th a t no ti ce ou ght to been given. If the Court did n o t requ i re no tice, any rto soner might discharge himself by having the courage make a false affidavit. Mr. Sergeant ANDREWS said that there must he al l T ." f davit of the Governor of the prison, w h o was aA offi °e „'; the Court, and there was therefo re no f ear o f 'she pr's discharging himself by a false oath. u. Mr. Baron PARKE said, that in the case of Da ve ' aft Crockett, in 2 Barnewell and Cr esswe ll, it was laid d 0 a¢ that it was necessary in the first i ns t ance th a t notice °' application this nature should be served on the plaintiff. te d, Mr. MAUNSELL said that if this application were gr' D ity the prisoner would be at once re li eve d f rom the nee's of delivering of his schedule. tbe r The LORD CHIEF JU STICE —Th ere wou ld be 0° bo mode of dealing with him ; the only question thew t ° o f considered was, of which of the two conflicting Ar ta fio Pa lueg ; dh l i i tr a h. m ni s om e t n A t tou t the prisoner schedule,as Evet.ot hr ceom t u atede o nene d g fiae l t i nd t ot t have of either seasititghi one.rn the this eAn teet benefit,. a,osica ti the s Pr's prop raoi ;Is oe tior to er yt within is the sixty v ll A d u a G ys. a AN said th a t th e A ct conteMPlAptser Mr. Baron the possibility of a prisoner obtaining his discharge by ° I ; to ing falsely, as the Bth section gives, in su c h ca se, rvie take the prisoner up again, and to proceed de 71021 0 . a to After some further conversation, a rule was grat e der show cause why the prisoner should not be discharged 0.00, the 48th G eorge 111., w hi c h w ill i nvo l ve t h e w h o l e que eti j e cl There being no other business ready to be Po cee with, the Court rose a t 11 o ' c l oc k. EXCHEQUER COURT.—(THIS GOLDSHEDE V. CATTERELL. ‘T the Mr. THESSIGER moved for a rule to shew cause w",,1001a verdict of 4201., found for the plaintiff in this case, e" si,"oela not be set aside, and a non-suit entered ;or that it not be reduced to the sum of 2101. alr, The action was tried before Lord Abinger, what? 1420'' peared that the petitioner held an overdue bill i°!.l for made by the defendant, for which he took two 1311"stoal 2101. each, in order " to take up," as the Ineni°ra° vet expressed it, the larger bill. One of these bills Wasd hie paid when it became due, and the plaintiff ex itereo big action to prove the original bill, which still reruainedtcoo; hands. The Learned Gentleman contended that tut' 00' tract contained in the memorandum was hindingld not therefore the action upon the old bill for 4.201. c°ll be The sustained. t. COURT doubted whether the words " to ta'%tioo could be construed as "in lieu of." That was a te'fsctt which ought to have been left to the Jury, and "-(15 (/' of the original bill being allowed to remain in the IntA;des the plaintiff would raise a strong presumption t.nr.3,11. the a mere substitution of the two bills in place of one, le purpose of gaining time. ;fit° the Mr. THESSIGER said, if he were allowed, to go -dot whole merits of the case, he would be able to shew ahe was a ease of very great hardship, as Mr. Cotterell, could explain why none of the bills had been paid. la be The COURT thought the justice of the case w°u satisfied by a rule to reduce the damages to 2101. Rule granted accordingly. ' COURT OF DAY ) , a IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES BUTLER, Abe Mr. BACON on behalf of a petitioner, &Aiming ti? fo.r creditor of the estate, a Mr. de Grouchy, aPPlrroo liberty to have his case set dow n for hearing to-cored the paper, and that an answer m', ht be filed. It aPPecia it ref petitioner's noto vaosinuesuriouss tioa assignees. When the meeting for proof oifndtehbetsset°e°clSl,ol before the Commissioner, the consideration of the, cilocthe was ordered to stand over, till it could be ascertainea ctioe". or not the decision could have any effect 'in theoice th; and it being shown that such could not alto/. the allowe'd bt assignees were appointed, and the peticioner prod Jo vote. The certificate, in the usual manner, was: :11% thrtieo the Commissioner, and the petitioner Was one theol debts t`i; chosen. Upon inquiry into the nrAture Commissioner was of opinion that it was usaliveent c 1 e appeared that the bankrupt was before in 17 that 'a cumstances, and had been declared a bankrupt ; ob.,aioej then owed the petitioner 625/., and that haviegoncl, 0,,4 his certificate he applied for a further loan of wer,oritYoloub obtained it upon the terms of giving a s ,01 /s° the sum lent and what was previously owing;, la b- shouto, The object of the motion was that Mr. De Oro .ac 0.r.0 be at liberty to show to their Honours that its ecles,ao,lo,ot not usurious, and that a new election of aisle' ~ould was ordered by the Commissioner for to-morrow, 5" in of r._us. be proceeded with. inter,,erso,_, The COURT could not see any necessity fora..a,.r of t::), the matter. If czamsel's opinion as to the vll eoYdioget,, first election of assignees was correct the r•°,,c, the r_b, morrow would be nugatory, and could not '..sffe,:bace rte tioner. If both parties consented, they vr,jald 4,,,..erui0 jection to hear the case, but they would rdiake ,heir rule, and they wished it to be understriod tb asso'l• might not affect any proceeding in the choice of, argti nees. The question of its legality could be hereatte „es, „,5 of id; for On Wednesday evening die Reform— 0 near Oldham, dined together. Tickets had beaeco.ol 4jYa seventy, but the desire to riarticipate in the rs !ver, iris moot of the evening was soA strong, that ticket et .op, to twenty more. The majority were freehoL '4,(1 county. Mr. William Halliwell occupiedj: ported on the right by Charles Hindley, tes on the left by Thomas Hopkins, Esq. des r 5 3.. rest Jacko, the ourang-outang, of the JaTidinuubli° at Paris, about whose indisposition so much p had been felt, died on Friday last. -