The Sun. — London, England, 1838-01-13 00:00:00

_ MAIL:. \ i rived. Due. Arrived. Due. Arrived. Due 0 Arnerie5.......... • 1 France ..... ....... 0 0 Lisbon I) 0 B raz il .........,.. 0 0 Guern. k Jersey 0 0 Malta 0 Buenos Ayres... 0 0 Hamburg ........ 1 0 ii..xico 0 0 Carthagertawk... 0 • Holland ...... .... 1 0 Ostend 0 2 Dub1in....:...... 0 • Jamaica IP • Sweden . A 4 Flanders ......... 1 0 Leeward Islands U 1 Waterford....... 0 HUM WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORROW. ; darning 17 minutes after 4 f Evening 32 minutes after 4 The publication f Tux SUN NILICSPAPEIR ecmmenced this day et 10 minutes past Three o' Clock. WITH WHICH " THE TRUE SUN" IS NOW INCORPORATED. .47), 'Vez* em,..sey Q.i49e LONDON : SATURDAY EVENING, JANUARY 13, 183,3. We direct attention to the Report in another part or our Paper of the Cotton Spinners' Trial at Edin burgh. The interest excited by the investigation is described as being intense beyond all parallel in the a.mals of the Scottish Criminal Courts. The trial lasted eight days, and the LORD JUSTICE CLERK had not concluded his charge to the Jury at the hour of post, four o'clock on Thursday. A number of madmen have for some time been en deavouring to get up petitions for the exclusion of Catholics from Parliament, and one for that purpose now lies for signature in a place dedicated to meetings for religious or humane purposes. There could not be a greater desecration of a place founded, if we are to lielieve its inscription, for encouraging peace and pro moting brotherly love. We will not ask these men, fur they are beyond redemption, but those men who opposed Catholic Emancipation from political motives, to contrast the present state of the country with that in which it must have been, had that great healing mea sure not been conceded ? In the winter of 1828-29, Ireland was on the brink of a rebellion —many of the Irish regiments were discontented, and more disposed to unite with their Catholic brethren, than preserve their fidelity to their SOVEREIGN ; and the Duke of WELLINGTON, to his immortal honour, ra ther than risk a civil war, gave up his conscientious scruples, and submitted to the reproaches of many of his oldest friends. He has never since de nied the expediency of the Catholic Relief Bill, and the peaceable and loyal conduct of the Irish nation at the present crisis is the best vindication of his con ?act. Ireland never wa so united to Ebglaml as at this moment. Nay, that country is even more English, If we may use the expression, than England. We hear of no meetings there to foment discord—to encourage freebooters to take dead:y aim at our fellow- subjects—and to involvorone of our most nourishing colonies in all the horrors of a protracted civil war. We believe Mr. ROEBUCK at present could not find one spot in Ireland on which to raise his standard. Could any language describe so eloquently the bless ings of a wise, a just, and a humane policy ? It is needless to draw a picture of the reverse, had the old, blind, ol)stinate, and b;gotttd policy been persevered in. Even these drivelling political fana- tics (fur they have no religion jri their souls), would they lay aside their prejudices for a moment, could draw a picture which would horrify every friend of hu ►nanity. The time is now arrived for uniting Ireland by indissoluble bor,ds to this country ; and if WELLING TON has any love for his native land, and the magna nimity to cast to the wind all party prejudices, he will seize the opportunity, and add another laurel to those that now adorn his brow. We are glad to see that RIDGWAY has just pub lished, in the form of a pamphlet, the speech which Lord BROUGHAM recently delivered in the House of Lords on the subject of the Civil List, and the income and expenses of the Crown. This speech, in point of solid, useful matter, is one of the most efficient that the Noble and Learned Lord ever delivered ; in fact it completely exhausts its theme. Were we not already fully aware that as a politician he is the foremost man of his time, the sagacity and foresight displayed in every page of this little pamphlet would at once lead us to this conviction of his Lordship's statesmanlike qualities. He puts the case in the clearest possible view, so that he who runs may read ; and proves that the bargain just concluded in a hurry with the Crown, as regards the Civil List, cannot fail to be a losing one for the people, inasmuch. as it will not prevent the Crown at some future period, from taking advantage of an alteration in prices, or some such God-send, and corning down to Parliament, and begging for an aug mentation of income which, as a matter of course, it will get. It was thus that GEORGE the THIRD sued literally in forma pauperis to the House of Com mons, which sympathized with the destitution of Royalty, and dutifully relieved its necessities. In fact, bargains of this sort are never binding but on one party--the people : the Crown never hesitates to set them aside, whenever it may be deemed expedient. We have warrant for this assertion in the history of the iast fifty years, which proves how little attention Royalty is in the habit of paying to those Civil List arrangements which the people hold to be binding upon it. Alluding to the present settlement, Lord BROUGHAM observes, " If the arrangement now made shall turn out to be unfavourable to the Crown ; if prices rise, if from an altered state of society, or from any other cause, an increased splendour is deemed ne cessary to the Royal dignity ; little will it avail the people to plead the final character of the settlement of 1837. That character will go for as little as it has done in former cases of the same kind—it will go for Absolutely nothing. But if it shall be found that :noney goes further than it does in the present day—if in the' progress of manufacturing industry the great .staples of luxurious expenditure become cheaper—or if the necessaries of life themselves are more abundant from improvements in agriculture—if it shall be found that, do what you will, you can no longer hold by the Corn-laws—if it should happen that the people of this country will no longer submit to buy wheat or eat bread at the rate of 625. the quarter on this side of the Channel, when as good or better may be had for be tween 30s. and 40s. on the other side—if your assent to the repeal of these Corn-laws should be extorted, by the hourly accumulating power of the resistance which all sound principle offers to their continuance—if, from the combined effect of all these very possible changes, to say nothing of accumulated capital, all prices should fall a third or more, and the sum now bestowed as ab solutely necessary for the Royal expenditure should thus be really worth much more than it now is—l ask any man capable of reflection what chance would there be of the Crown, or the :Ministers of the Crown, or Pari;atoent itself, coming forward with a proposal to reduce by a third, aye, or by a thirtieth, the income now fixed, so as to give the country any benefit from the alteration produced upon its value by the course of events ?. In short, this is a bargain which, if the Crown finds it advantageous, must be adhered to Orouelt all times and all changes with equal tenacity ; Tart if any benefit should accrue to . the country from keeping it, and the Crown should find its interest in breaking it, then it may be broken over and over again, just as often as is convenient for one of the parties ; n d for the protection of the other its value is that of A vaste paper. We trust this speech of Lord BROUGHAM'S will be generally disseminated, for it is calculated to throw much light on a nice point not so generally understood as it should be. It must, we think, be matter of surprise, if not of astonishment, to all who are gifted with the power of reflecting upon the events that are passing around them, that at this time of day there should be found any considerable number of persons having the hardi hood to call upon the State for endowments out of the public money, to support a particular sect of religion ists. It might fairly have been supposed that the ample developement which the principles of religious liberty have received of late years, the enthusiasm displayed by the people in favour of those principles, and the homage which the Government and the Legis lature have been compelled to pay to them, would have pointed out to the most bigoted advocates of religious establishments the impolicy, if not the danger, of bringing forward claims so repugnant to the public feeling. It might have been imagined that, at a mo ment when religious establishments are every where the subjects of popular discontent, and the objects of popular attack—every where regarded as intolerable grievances—the professed friends of such establish ments would have been thankful to be allowed to re tain the endowments of which they are already in pos session, without attempting to bring greater odium upon their favourite system of compulsory religion by demands of additional support from the oppressed and insulted tax-payers of Great Britain. Instead of this defensive and prudent policy, however, they have had the infatuation to assume an aggressive attitude, and unless we are greatly mistaken, they will have bitter cause to rue the course they are pursuing. The argument put forth by the Church-extension people of Scotland is, that there is religious destitu tion to a frightful extent in that part of the United Kingdom, and that ihersfore it is proper that the means of supplying this deficiency should be fur nished by the public. This is the modest demand made by the Presbyterian Church. Now taking it for granted (for the present) that the premises are correct—that there is a want of religious instruction in Scotland—let us look a little at the principle involved in the conclusion, and the consequences which are likely to follow from its admission. The great principle that no man shall be compelled to support a system of religion of which he does not approve is now all but universally recognized. Of course we do not mean to say that the Tory majority in the House of Lords, and the minority in the Com mons, do not cling to the opposite doctrine ; but to the extent to which we have stated, the rights of con science are maintained by the great bulk of the nation ; and, what is of some importance in this discussion, also by the Ministers of the Crown. In corroboration of this latter assertion—the former wants none—we have only to refer to the Bill brought into Parliament last Session by the Government for the Abolition of Church -rates, which was founded, and defended by them, entirely on the principle that the Dissenters ought not to be forced to contribute their money to the sup port of a religious system of which they conscientiously disapproved. Now, the grievance of which the Scotch Dissenters complain is far greater in one respect than that under which their English brethren labour. Church -rates, however unjust in principle, are sanc tioned by long—almost immemorial usage ; whereas the endowment of the EStablished Church of Scotland is an additional yoke of bondSge about to be imposed upon the necks of the Scottish Dissenters, and that too ill an age of light and liberty! But, in truth, the English Dissenters are as much interested in this endowment scheme as those of Scot land. The latter may, perhaps, feel more immediately the effects of a superiority given to a rival sect—they may have more reason to complain that the patronage of a Government, which owes them so deep a debt of gratitude, has been bestowed on their and its own enemies—they may he more annoyed by these new Churches having been erected in such situations as to confront and look down upon tile humble building de dicated to the voluntary worship of the Deity—erected there too, perhaps, as much with the view of thinning the ranks of Dissent as of extending religious instruction to the poor ; but the English Dissenters —aye, and the Irish Catholics also—must bear in mind that out of their pockets comes the money that goes to the endowment of the Presbyterian Church of Scotland. We • ask these advocates of the rights of conscience, whether it is not. their duty to make common cause with the Dis senters of Scotland, and by public meetings, by peti tions to the Legislature—in short, by every means in their power—to throw their overpowering weight into the scale of civil and religious freedom? If they re main neutral in this contest—if the English Dissenters tamely acquiesce in the application of the pub lic money to the endowment of the Established Church in Scotland—with what face can they call upon the Legislature to exempt them from a pecu niary contribution to the Church of England, which is sanctioned by long-established usage, as well as by the law of the land ? Suppose it should be proposed, as it has been already, that the Church-rates should be charged upon the consolidated fund, what objection could the Dissenters make - to the proposal ? Would they not instantly be met with the taunting question— " Where were your conscientious scruples when the Scottish Church received its endowment out of the same fund ? If you did not object to that charge upon the public revenue, you cannot with consistency object to this—the principle is the same in both, the compulsory support of a national Church." What reply can be made to this question by any man who does not now raise his voice against the projected grant ? None. Every man so acting has voluntarily and advisedly surrendered his right to complain, and must submit to the humiliating consequences of his own act. It is therefore, we repeat, the bounden duty of all, to whatever sect they belong, who claim exemption from the payment of Church rates on the plea of conscience—and this plea is as strong against a levy on the Exchequer as against a levy on goods and chattels—to vindicate their consistency and Christian sincerity by an uncom promising opposition to the intended plan of applying the public money to the endowment of additional churches in Scotland. The Paris Journals of Thursday have all been re ceived. Towards the conclusion of Wednesday's sit ting an animated debate took place in the Chamber of Deputies, on the subject of Spanish intervention. Previous to its commencement the following amend ment recognising the nationality of Poland was adop ted by an overwhelming majority : " Sire, we set an example of the faithful execution of treaties, and in our turn we have a right incessantly to remind Europe of the guarantees which she has solemnly given to the ancient nationality of Poland—a nationality which will aver have justice and our warmest sympathies in its favour." After some discuss on upon the fourth paragraph, which refers to the Quadruple Treaty, M. THIERS, Minister for Foreign AfFairs when that treaty was signed, made a powerful appeal to the Chamber in support of a direct intervention. He said For his part he would say that when France, in the face of the world, had signed a treaty binding her to the exclusion of the two Pretenders from the Peninsula, to limit her *lion to wishes and indirect assistance was to betray utter ignorance of the spirit of the Quadruple Treaty. What, has the Govern ment been simple enough, after concluding, in the face of the world, a treaty for the expulsion of the Pretender, to perceive, three years afterwards, that it had perhaps involved France ? If this were the case, the Government must not adopt the past, but avow itself guilty of an, incommensurable blunder, for it has contracted a solemn engagement towards Europe ; it must come forward and declare that it has compromised the future repose of France, and that inateknowledging the Queen it has sacrificed the real interests of the country. The President of the Council was equally explicit THE SUN, LONDON, SATURDAY, JANUARY 13, 1838. in repudiating the intervention recommended by M. THIERS. The following extract from his Speech must open the eyes of the; Spanish Liberals to the utter hopelessness of looking to France for deliver- KILMORE HOUSE, CAVAN. TO THE EDITOR OF THE SUZY. January 5, 1838. Sir.,--By the kindness of a friend I have been favoured with your paper of the 27th of December, in which, on the authority of " A Correspondent from Cavan," you have in. serted a statement injurious to my character, and utterly desti tute of all truth. I perhaps have no reason to complain. As an Irish Clergy man, I am an object of calumny and persecution, and in this my lot is not singular. It is untrue that I have " commenced the work of extermination"—untrue that I recommended it— untrue that I have ejected any families on account of any pro vision in the new Poor-law Bill—untrue that I have expressed any " intention to exterminate sixty other Catholic families" —and also untrue that I have, as you infer, behaved with cruelty to any Roman Catholic tenants. The circumstances which your correspondent has falsified were simply these. I have been obliged to eject the tenants of four farms for non-payment of rent, and one for that, joined with improper conduct. These tenants experienced from see no severity, but every lenity and kindness. They have long owed me a considerable arrear. I have given them notice to quit several times, and ejected two, if not more, in the year 1834 ; but on their earnest entreaties and solemn promises of future punctuality, I allowed them to continue in their farms. Find ing matters getting worse, and other tenants beginning to fol low their example, I served them with notice to quit in November, 1836 ; but told them that I would not proceed if they would pay up their arrears. I was finally obliged to pro ceed at the July Quarter Sessions, and I then obtained eject ments. Had I wished to proceed harshly, or merely with a view to my own interests, I would forthwith have put the eject ments into force, and entered into possession of the farms and growing crops, which would have secured me from pecuniary loss. This would have been to them ruin. I acted in a dif ferent spirit. I gave them leave to mow their hay, reap their corn, and dig their potatoes—to remove them from the pre mises, and go away, taking all their crops, and owing, some a year's rent, and some rent for a year and a half. This is the reason they went out in " this inclement season of the year." They could not dig their potatoes till November. These fine farms having thus come into my heeds, I gave them to the sons and relations of my Protestant parishioners, who arc en deared to me by so many ties, and this was the head and front of my offending. As soon as it was known, a tumultuous mob entered my lands at night, tore down a house and offices, and threatened the lives of my bailiff and Protestant tenants, as well as my own. So you see your Correspondent's hint about attempting " to exercise their vengeance on the succes sors and immediate author of their affliction" has been already acted upon. My Protestant tenants are in nightly dread of murder and arson. The servant of one has fled, after solemnly warning his master of impending dang2r ; and none among them dare rest in peace at night, but one and all are obliged to sit up and keep an armed watch. You thus see, Sir, on my part, there is neither oppression nor bigotry:; but both are exercised against me. If again, Sir, you make your journal a common-sewer for the malice and falsehood of such persons as your Cavan Cor respondent, in justice you ought to make the assailed party aware of the attack; for, if I err not, I read, " Cursed is he who smiteth his neighbour secretly." Your obedient servant, MARCUS BERESFORD. ance : Two systems of policy had been placed in presence ; the one admitted the possibility of an intervention ; the other ex cluded that possibility. He (the Minister) would defend the latter system. The Quadruple Treaty, when signed, bound France to nothing—(" Oh, oh I")—but merely stipulated that an application should be made to her when her co-operation might be necessary. In a month afterwards France engaged to close the frontier of the Pyrenees, but bound herself to no thing further. Government had fulfilled all the obligations entered into by France, and, with the exception of an armed intervention, had afforded all possible aid to Spain. Govern ment ardently desired the triumph of the Liberal cause in Spain ; but he was boudd to state his opinion unreservedly, that in no case could France intervene in that country.— (" Oh, oh 1") The situation of France was not sufficiently en couraging to admit of an army of 80,000 men being sent to occupy Spain. France had already done for Spain more than she had been required to do, and as long as he should be at the head of affairs more should not be done. The debate of this question was resumed on Thurs day, and was not brought to a close up to three o'clock. MM. PASSY and MAGUIN followed on the same side as M. TRIERS. The latter thus forcibly pointed out the error of which France had been gniltv, in refusing the first co-operation demanded by the Spanish Government : The gradual revelution in French policy formed an immense circle, in performing which France had first allied with Eng land and then deserted her. Yet at an enrly epoch two squa drons of horse, sent after Don Carlos, would have terminated or prevented the war. Later still, two years ago, the war re quired 25,000 men to terminate it. It would now demand 80,000. Let Don Carlos mount the throne, and this force would no longer suffice. Such was the progress of the question. There is no other intelligence of any interest in the Paris Journals of Thursday. From the North of Spain, no accounts had been received of a later date than those referred to in The Sun of yesterday. FRENCH FUNDS.—PARIS. JAR. 11. Five per Cents., 1081 99c. 109 f. 10°f. 95c. Four and a Half ner Cents. 1051. 10c. Four per Cents., 101 f. nnc. fhree.per Cents., 79f. 35e. 30e. 40c. Bank Actions, 2,020 f. 2,630 f. Rente ue Naples, NZ 20 1 . Roman Five per Cents., 101. Spanish Actives, 21 2,1%44. Spanish Passives, 4 Bel g ian Bank, 1,496 f. 1,495 f. 1,4101-. 1,492 f. Sc. ' Portu ; uese Loan, Three per Casts. 191.4. Haytian Loan, 2;9l'f. EXCRANGZ ON Lorton:v. One month, paper, —f. —c. ; money, 25f. 47%c Three months, paper, 25f. 32N,c. ; money, 25t. 321,4 e. LAST PRICES. Five per Cents. 109 f. 29c. Three per Cents. 79f. 55c. Bank Actions, 2,650 f. Romans, 101. Belgian Bank, 1,4921. Spanish Actives, 2A. Spanish Passives, 4%,. Haytian Loan, 3901. For the Funds and News of the day, see the third page. IRELAND. (vnoM OUR OWN CORRIZSPONPENT.) DUBLIN, THURSDAY, THE GREAT REFORM .BANQUET. The day of this great demonstration has at length arrived, and the anxiety and curiosity of the public is at fever heat. Nearly ssven hundred tickets, indeed all that could be issued, are already disposed of, and the laggards are now offering a premium for admission. Five pounds have been offered for two tickets, and refused ; and the demand for tickets at an extra price is so great that the Committee has issued a regulation making it necessary for the seller of a ticket to have the pur chaser's name and address indorsed upon the back of it. Fourteen hundred Ladies' tickets have been issued, and even one cannot now be had (to use an Irish phrase) " for love or money." There will be a dozen and a half different tables arranged to fjrm a magnificent and imposing coup d'ceil. At the grand table Lord Charlemont will preside, and on his right and left will be seated Lord Brebszon, Daniel O'Con nel, M.P., Robert Hutton, M. P., George Evans, M. P., Lord Fingal, Lord Cloncurry, Lord L'smore, Lord Cremorne, Lord Gormanstown, Lord Talbot de Malahide, Sir John Kennedy, Bart , Sir Percy Nugent, Bart., Richard Sheil, M. P., James Power, M. P., Nicholas Bail, M. P., Henry Grattan, M.P., Morgan O'Coneell, M.P. ' John O'C o n ne ll, M. P., John Maher, M. P., Colonel Burg - oyne, and Mr. Fraecis Finn, late member for Kilkenny. It would be vain to attempt to name a tithe of the " lions" who will be scattered over the other tab'es—enough that they will include the most eminent, respectable (in the best sense of the adjective of many meanings), and wealthy individuals not only of the metropolis, but of the kingdom. The fact of Lord Cremorne attending is one of great promise to the li beral party. He is a young nobleman wanting a few months of being of age, who has vast property and influence in this country. In Monaghan alone he possesses nearly a whole barony, and will be able to rescue that important county from the Tory faction. His father was a Peer of the people when few merited or sought that title, and this is the first public act in the life of the present Lord which indicated his inten tion of taking the same course. At this hour (five o'clock) the doors have been thrown open, and the arrivals are exceedingly numerous, though the dinner will not be on the table for nearly two hours. THE NEW SHERIFFS, COUNTY CLARE.—Knowing, as all the world knows, the perfect impartiality and freedom from bias of the Irish judges, it is hard to account for the following piece of, shall I call it, chicanery, which has taken place in Clare with reference to the choice of a new Sheriff for Clare. The present Sheriff, Mr. M‘Mahon, returned a list to the Judges of Assize, as in duty bound, containing a number of names, out of which they might select three names to submit to the Lord Lieutenant, out of whom to appoint Sheriff. The names submitted to the Judges were those of ten gen tlemen of the highest respectability in the county, five being Protestants and five Catholics, an arrangement evidently fair and important. Well, what did their Lordships? Why, returned a list in which not one cf the two names were retained, the three chosen being thorough going Tories. What the Lord- Lieutenant will do under such circumstances is not yet known, but it is confidently hoped, since the Judges set him the ex ample of stepping out of the list, lie will not fail to pursue a similar course with the list prepared by them. KILKENNY CORPORATION.—The Mayor of Kilkenny and the citizens hare been for some time in communication about the propriety of calling a meeting for the purpose of repealing the by-laws of the Corporation of the 19th ef November, 1657, and 25th of June, 1753, and all other by-laws which directly or indirectly transferred, or purported to transfer, from the Mayor and citizens at large, to the Mayor, Aldermen, Masters, and Wardens or Common Councilmen, the power of m aking laws, statutes, and ordinances for the government of said city ; said assembly then to proceed to make such an enactment as might re-invest the Mayor and citizens at large with municipal powers as ample as originally granted to them by the charter of his late Majesty King James the First. The Mayor, how ever, declined calling the projected meeting without con sulting the law officers of the Crown, and they, on being con sulted, refused to give any opinion on the point, as it involved the rights of individuals. Thus the matter stands at present, but thus it cannot long stand, as the people of Kilkenny have taken up the question with great zeal and interest. The result is anticipated with much anxiety by both parties. A CORPORATION DINNER.—On Tuesday last the greedy, guttling corporators, dined together on the occasion of She riff Quinton's first " official dinner." The sobriety an d de cency that would be looked for from such an assembly, is small indeed; for the Dublin Corporation have always contrived to out-Alderman all other Aldermen in bigotry and absurdity. It is true that, upon this occasion, the " glorious memory" was omitted, at least the Orange Press, the only one admitted, says nothing of its being given ; but Ernest of Hanover was pledged with nine times nine, and the toast of " the Lord Lieutenant, and prosperity to Ireland," was received with dis approbation, and cries of " Away, away I" Sir Francis Bur dett was of course eulogised, and Lord Melbourne abused ; and after several similar matters of course had been performed, their Worships got duly drunk, and separated by the assistance of the new Police. nights od t ad h ye a a forg( night, yearstr, rather rthave travelling I past. lti.on ga state from n e HARD FROST—SUDDEN DEATIL—The frost has been more Gloucester, e l f d o o u r h e i t e s h s e t d e l e ‘ r a a ,:s i l f a:: o f n r o n z i T e g n h u English gentleman named William Fowles, from Minchin si t w e e t ; n i e c r p h e t o c h n a e , u r Limerick to Dublin. He has been in the habit of doing busi ness in Limerick for several years, and he left it ou Tuesday w on the outside of the mail ; an d w h en h e arrived in town he had to be moved from th e coac h to hi s hotel, Challoner's,on Eden Quay, where he died in a f ew h ours. He was buried this day. IMPORTANT.—The new police last night took into custody two fellows who were disturbiag the streets with cries of " No Popery 1" On searching them there was found upon t h e person of one of them, earned William Warwick, the warrant of an Orange Lodge, dated the 11th of December, 1837 ; and yet we are told Orangeisrn is extinct 1 This document i s at pre sent in the hands of the authorities. Yesterday, there was a grand display of skating in the Regent's-park. The quadrille, the waltz, the figure of eight, and the figure three were ably executed. Sir William Newton took the lead. He is considered to be the first per former of the present day. There were present William Ains worth, James Murray, R. Staveley, the Chiltons, the liellvars, the Pages, the Thorntons, and C. Brooke, Esqra. At the beginning of November an aged ecclesias tic of Paris, and his housekeeper were apprehended on a charge of horse-stealing; a circumstance arising from th e fact of their having found a horse stra3ine• on the sout h ern boulevards one evening, which they took ' home, and subse quently sold. They were brought before the Tribunal of Correctional Police a few days aeo, to take their trial for the imputed offence. It came out, however, from the depositions made by several respectable witnesses, including some eccle siastics, and the Rector of St. Eustacho, that the Reverend Personage now inculpated was a man of extreme simplicity of mind, that he had taken the horse home from pure com passion for the animal, had kept, and afterwards disposed of it, without the least idea of criminality entering into his mind. lie never thought of advertising it, and did nct know how to get rid of in, so he sold it. Himself and his housekeeper were therefore acquitted by the Court. DESTRUCTION OF THE ROYAL EXCHANGE. OFFICIAL REPORT. Yesterday Mr. Braidwood, the superintendent of the Lon don Fire Brigade, sent in a report to the various fire-offices of the damage cawed by the late conflagration, as far as the particulars could be ascertained up to twelve o'clock on Thursday night. According to the report, it appears that the varole of the Royal Exchange, comprising four wings, occupied as Lloyd's Coffee-rooms, the Royal Exchange, Shipping, Fire, and Life Assurance Offices, the Gresham Committee-rooms, the British Merchant Seamen's Institution offices, and other offices belonging to numerous individuals, were totally consumed. The Exchange was the property of the Gresham Committee and the Mercers' Company. The whole of the building was insured in the Royal Exchange In surance Company. CASTLE-ALLEY, CORN HILL. Mr. Charles Williams, No. 1, watch-maker, the building and stork greatly damaged ; insuran ce un k nown . No. 2, Withers and Scores, public notaries, stock con sumed, which is insured in the Guardian-oftice. No. 3, Messrs. James Bethel ar,cl Co., stationers, the stock entirely consumed ; insured in the Guardian. No. 4, Dundee Steam Packet Office, belonging to a Com pany, contents of the shop consumed; insurance unknown. No. 7, Sutton, Son, and Gribble, business not ascertained, the stock consumed ; insurance unknown. No. 8,-Messrs. Foster and Son, stock-brokers, the contents of the shop consumed. No. 9, Mr. Davis, stock-broker, stock consumed. No. 10, Messrs. De Hague and Co., stock-brokers, the con tents of the shop consumed; insurance unknown. No. 11, Mr. Peak, stock-broker, stock wholly consumed ; not insured. No. 12, Messrs. Boughton and Grinstead, stock-brokers ; stock consumed, insurance unknown. NORTH SIDE. OF THF. EXCHANGE. No. 1, George Palmer, stock-broker, consumed ; not in sured. No. 2, Mr. Betts, stationer, stock and shop consumed ; in• surance unknown. No. 3, Mr. Pedley, soda-water maker, consumed ; insur. ante unknown. No. 4, Mr. Jones, optician, stock in track ar.d shop de stroyed; insurance unknown. No. 5, Messrs. Burrup and Blight, stationers, stock and the fixture: in the shop greatly damaged ; insured in the Lon don office. No. 6, Mr. Eastwood, auctioneer, shop and content; con• sumed ; insurance unknown. No. 7, Mr. Hoslges, tobacconist, shop and stock in trade de• stroyed ; insurance unknown. No. 8, Bromley and Co., booksellers, shop and stock con. sumed ; insurance unknown. SWEETING'S-ALLEY. No, 12, Mr. Tent, hosier and linen-draper, the stock greatly damaged. and the fixtures in the shop injured ; not insured. No. 13, Mr. Pawky, mapseller, greatly damaged; not in sured. The upper floors of Nos. 12 and 13 were occupied by Mr. Henry Towgood and Mr. Longbridge, business unknown ; they have sustained considerable injury by fire and water; they are not insured. Nos. 14 and 15, Mr. G. L. French, chronometer-maker, the back part of the premises burnt, and the whole much damaged ; not insured. No. 16, Messrs. Venn and Co., notaries, the premises con siderably damaged by water ; not insured. No. 17, A double house, one portion occupied by Messrs. Vegeunie and Co., hat-makers, and Mr. Smith, watch-maker, greatly damaged ; insurance unknown. No. 18, Mr. Button, confectioner, the stock damaged, and building injured by the fire ; not insured. No. 19, Barker and Son, hatters, shop and contents greatly damaged ; insurance unknown. No. 20, Mr. Joseph, boetmaker, much damaged ; insurance unknown. SOUTH SIDE OP THE EXCHANGE. No. 90, Mr. Graves, tobacconist, the shop and stock therein consumed ; insurance unknown. No. 91, Shop, name of the occupier unknown, consumed. No. 88, Effingham Wilson, bookseller, the shop injured, and the stock damaged by hasty removal and water ; insurance unknown. Everitt, new:-mgent, shop totally consumed ; insurance un known. Lott, stationer, shop and contents consumed ; the stock is insured in the Phcenix Office. The above are the whole of the particulars that could be obtained according to the report, but the engineers and firemen were still engaged yesterday in making inquiries, in order to ascertain the full extent of the various losses. In addition to the foregoing particulars, we ascertained that the offices of Messrs. Bell, Hath w ay, Holmes, and Pottle and Lettley, on the south side of the Exchange, of which no men tion is made in Mr. Braidwood's report, are consumed. The shop of Mr. Williams, watchmaker, at the corner of Castle alley, has sustained much damage, but whether insured or not could not be discovered. In Sweeting's-alley, the houses and shops on the east side, from No. i to No. 7 inclusive, occupied by Mr. Edith Terry, proprietor of the Turkey and Mediterra nean Coffee-house ; Mr. Noxley, silversmith and jeweller ; Mr. Samuel Knight, printseller ; Messrs. Joseph Sykes and Co., tobacconists ; Messrs. Henry and John Baldwin, woollen drapets and tailors; Mr. Booth, hat-maker; and Messrs. Simpson and Co., tailors—are all much damaged, in conse quence of its having been deemed necessary to carry the hose of the engines through the dwellings, to prevent them taking fire. The following account of the temperature of the weather is taken from the thermometer of the door-way of Messrs. Swain and Co., Fleet -street, during one week i n 1837 and the corresponding week in 1838, each day at noon :- 1837. 1838. Jan. Bth 9th 10th 11th 12th..... 39 13th soi lath 25 Mad. de Bourgoing having attained the age of 74, and being affected in her mind by the double loss of a son and a daughter, has retired from the office of Directress of the In stitution at St. Denis for daughters of members of the Legion of Honour. She is replaced by Mad. Danery, who was go verness to the children of Joseph Bonaparte when King of Spain, and who has recently lost her husband and he son, both of whom held diplomatic situations. About a week ago, a poor man who resides in Paddy's Close, whose wife was about to be confined, called on a midwife, and requested her attendance, but the woman re fused, on the ground that she wanted the balance of a shilling f or services rendered on some previous occasion. Deeply grieved the poor man beat about everywhere, and everywhere wa s disappointed ; and at length his helpmate without assist ance bore a child, which only lived a few hours. The mother herself was afterwards taken ill, and although kindly visited by Dr. ifacklock, has since gone the way of all the earth. That such cases should occur in a Christian country is griev ous in the ex!reme, and proves that there are moral terri tories for charitable exertion as yet totally unexplored._ _Dumfries Courier. THE BALLOT. MEETING AT GREENWICH. A public meeting of the electors of Greenwich was held at the Mitre Tavern, on Thursday night, for the purpose of agreeing to resolutions, and a petition to the Legislature, praying " that at all future elections Members returned to Parliament be elected by Ballot," E. G. BARNARD, Esq., M.P. in the Chair, who rose and said, that this was not a hole and corner meeting, but one called for the purpose of giving the electors of the borough an oppor tunity of expressing their sentiments freely upon the great and momentous question they had met to consider. Resolutions had been formed, upon which a petition had been founded, which would be submitted for their approval for the adoption of Vote . by Ballot. Indeed, the Ballot appeared to him un objectionable ; Lord J. Russell, it was true, had refused to make it a Cabinet question ; but it might, nevertheless, and no doubt would, become an open question among the Ministers.--( Hear, hear.) The present system laid the election open to that grinding and crushing, which could 'no longer be borne.—(Continued cheers.) He wished the elective franchise to be so open, and conducted in such a spirit of independence, that the elector when asked for whom he would vote, could answer " What is that to you ? I have my own conscience to consult, and shall act accord ingly." He did not wish to see the poorer man kick down his wealthier neighbour, still he wished him to be so far inde pendent as to show a bold front to him.—( Hear.) The Bal lot had been said to be Un-English in consequence of its being secret, but he contended that it was the abuse of the open sys tem which had made it necessary. If an elector were pressed to tell for whom he intruded to vote, he would have a right to say I will not tell you, or if I do I will not tell you true. Suppose he was in an enemy's country, and his wife and fa mily secreted in a cave, would not he be justified, upon being asked where they were by his enemy, in pointing to one place while he knew they were in another. He wished every man to go to the poll completely independent of his neighbour. They (the people) had their own rights and privileges to pro tect and support, and it was their own fault if they did not exercise that right. The parties opposed to them wished to reduce the liberties they had already got, and fritter away the most important portions of the Reform Bill ; but if they would support him he would stand forward in support of the Ballot and shorter duration of Parliaments, which would bo their only safeguard.—(Loud cheers.) T. LEWIN, Esq., A. M., then came forward, to move that the petition be agreed to, to be presented to the House of Commons. Previously to entering generally into the merit of the question before the meeting, he produced a model of Mr. Grote's Ballot-box, which, although not perfect in every particular, seemed to be as nearly so as can be ex pected under the circumstances, and appeared to give ge neral satisfaction. In answer to a question put by an elector, as to how a per son should act who could not read the names on the card which is shown him ? Mr. LEWIN admitted that the system proposed could not answer all purposes, but that the principle and general-work ing of it would be found to be advantageous. He would ask if the people had the rights which they ought to have ? ( Cries of " No.") It appeared to him that the more up rightly a person acted, and on principle, the more he was sub jected, under the present system to be injured.—(Cries of " It's too true.") He contended that the Ballot was a re medy for those evils, and that it would give great benefit to the country.—( Cheers.) An objection had been made to the Ballot, on the ground that the Government would he thrown into the hands of the electors.—(Hear, hear.) Every elector who voted against his conscience had an object or motive for 30 doing, and if the object for doing wrong were removed, the elector, in all proba bility, would act rightly, inasmuch as there is greater satisfac tion in acting so than otherwise, and which he would do un less swayed by unworthy motives.—( Hear, hear.) Another objection was, that the ballot would create a system of lying, and it was of all things desirable that the moral of the elector should be preserved. If he thought it would have the effect of corrupting a voter's morality, it would be a matter for se rious consideration. But he (Mr. Lewin) contended that the voter who was coerced into making a promise against his conscientious opinion by his landlord, or some one who had influence over him, there was no impropriety in his not per forming that promise, but rather that he should act in accord ance with the dictates of his conscience, and do his duty to his country and his God.—( Cheers.) There could be no moral impropriety in a man returning to his duty when he had, after improper influences had been pressed upon him, been induced to make a promise in violation of his conscience and his duty. It had also been urged that the ballot had not answered in Amer' a, in France, and in Norway ; and credit had been given to a party who had so represented the case to be the fact, in the United States, but who had only been a short time and who consequently could know little about the matter. In deed, how little did many gentlemen know of the workings of the executive in this country ; were they to examine the facts, what a lamentable deficiency in their knowledge would they dis cover ' • and yet we are called upon to give c r e d e n ce to a person as to the acting of the ballot in America who had only been a few months there. In opposition to those opinions he would remind the meeting that in the United States those who en joyed the vote by ballot in_ the first instance retained it, and the other States had subsequently followed their example, which was tolerably conclusive that the system worked well, and General Jackson their late President, bad expressed an opinion that vote by ballot h£d conferred upon them that power and freedom which they now exercised.—( Hear, hear.) In France the freedom of the people had been preserved by the fraction of the representative of the country who were elected by Ballot. But there was no occasion to travel out or this country to prove that the Ballot would be beneficial to the people. The upper classes had their elections by Ballot in the various club-houses, and it was fitting they should, be cause they could not trust each other. If there was open voting there would be plenty of pulling of noses among those who„under the Ballot system, remained good friends.—( Hear, hear.) Again, trial by jury is a secret suffrage acted upon in this country; a juryman keeps his own council and that of his fellows, and this was done because he should not be re strained in the vote he should think proper to give in respect to the criminality of a prisoner at the bar. He, therefore, considered that the secret system might be productive of much good, and could not taking all circumstances into consideration, be looked upon as un-English.—( Hear, hear, hear, and cheers.) The worthy Gentleman con cluded a very argumentative speech by proposing the resolu tion for the adoption of a petition to the House of Commons amidst general cheering. Mr. POWLE seconded the motion. The resolution was carried unanimously. GEO. BORRETT, Esq., in proposing the next resolution, ob served that they all felt and knew the necessity of the Ballot. If he had to pin his political faith to the sleeve of any indivi dual it would be to that of Thomas Law Hodges, Esq., M. P., whose honesty and independence were plain to every observer. He could also add that he felt the same high respect for the upright and independent conduct of their worthy Chrirman ; but he felt a delicacy in stating the extent of his feelings in the presence of the individual. Those Gentlemen were inde pendent in principle, rich in pocket, who aspired to nothing more than the good wishes of their neighbours, and the welfare and prosperity of their country. The Ballot he considered essentially necessary, inasmuch as he had witnessed circum stances under the present system which showed that the elec tive franchise could not be exercised independently without placing the party in jeopardy from his richer neighbour, or those who had official influence over him.—( Hear, hear.) He had witnessed a system of coercion at Cambridge, during the late election, the seat of learning and religion, even there, where it ought to be expected liberality should reign, the most heartless cruelty had taken place : and lie would add, too, by the head of a college.—(" Shame.") A man, who had a wife and six children, had, after holding a situation for twenty-five years, been deprived of it because he had ven tured to act independently. In such cases as these the fran chise is a curse rather than a blessing, if the poor and de pendent voter was not protected in the exercise of it. —( Hear. ) He believed that all Governments disliked the Ballot. Lord John Russell disliked it —( Hear and laughter.) They had all reason to be thankful for the course of events ; for in stance Mr. Angerstein was opposed to the ballot, and no doubt would have been so still, had he been returned for East Surrey ; but he was now a convert to the Ballot, which he would not have been, in all probability, if he had been returned for that district, and it was more than likely Lord J. Russell would have seen the necessity of it had he been thrown out at Stroud.—( Hear.) Under the Ballot candidates would come forward, lay their claims and sentiments before the electors, and, as independent men, would say, " Here I am, I have laid before you my political sentiments, but I will not run the risk of ruing my wife and family in attempting to obtain your suffrages at the cost the old system would entail upon ine."—( Hear, hear.) And no man would be such an egregi ous fool as to expend 15,0001. or 20,0001, in an attempt to bribe those on whom he could not depend. If the Ballot were once adopted there might be one canvass after it, but he felt assured that would be the last.—(Cheers.) A vote of thanks was then given to the Chairman, who, in returning thanks for the honour conferred, stated that he would have great pleasure in doing every thing in his power to forward the measure they had in view. He hoped that they would not be disenheartened if they did n ot atta i n their object year; and he would advise them to continue to peti tion the House year after year, until they had attained the constitutional measure they sought f or . T heir opponents were attempting to fritter away the Reform Bill, and unless they were protected by the Ballot, the Reform Bill would ulti mately be a nullity. It having been unanimously agreed that the resolutions and petition should be advertis e d i n t h e Greenwich Patriot news paper, the efficient organ of the Reform interest of West Kent; and after sundry neat and appropriate speeches the large assemblage separated. • — 7 , JANUARY.--Most persons imagine that January presents but little, if anything, to please and instruct them ; but were they close and attentive observers of ali that is now to be seen and heard in the woods and fields, they would soon find that, even in this month, they may— " With some delight the days outwear, Although the coldest of the year." A large stack of warehouses are now building on the piece of ground called Montague-close, on the north side of the ancient collegiate church of St. Saviour's, Southwark. The new warehouses are the property of Alderman Hum phery, M. P., and extended the whole length of the venerable church, the pride and the shame of St. Saviour's parish. On the plot of land on which the extet:sive premises are now erecting for commereial'purposes once stood a monastery. The ruins of the nave of the old church will present a woful contrast with the lofty pile of warehouses when they are com pleted. WINDSOR-FIDAY. The Queen accompanied by her Royal Highness the Duchess of Kent, and attended by some of the ladies and gentlemen of the suite, walked out for a short time this afternoon. Her Majesty's walk was confined to the terrace and immediate vi cinity of the castle. At the royal dinner,yesterday evening, there were present-- the Queen. her Royal Highness the Duchess of Kent, Lady Portman, Viscount Melbourne, Lady Mary Stopford, Viscount Palmerston, Mr. and Lady C. Digby, Hon. Mr. and Miss Murray, Hon. Colonel Grey, Hon. Mrs. Campbell, Hon. Col. and Miss Cavendish, Viscount Torrington, Hon. Misses Loy cosier, and Darys, &c. The Queen's chamber musicians were in attendance, as usual, during the evening. The Earl of Liverpool, and Lady C. Jenkinson, and the Earl and Countess of Albemarle arc expected at the castle to morrow. COURT CIRCULAR. The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge entertained Baron Von Plessen and a small party at dinner on Thursday, at Cam bridge . House. Ai half-past ten o'clock yesterday morning the Duke of Cambridge left town on a visit to the Earl and Countess of Jersey, at Middleton Park, Oxford. The Duchess of Gloucester entertained their Royal High nesses the Duchess of Cambridge, Prince George, and the Princess Augusta of Cambridge at dinner last evening at Gloucester House. Mr. Jones had an interview with Lord Glenelg yesterday, at the Colonial Office. The Secretary at War had an interview with Lord John Russell yesterday, at the Home-office. Despatches for Sir E. C. Disbrowe, Minister Plenipoten tiary at the. Hague, were sent off yesterday from the Foreign office. FASHIONABLE INTELLIGENCE. ARRIVALS. Mr. Bankhead, at Batt's Hotel, Dover-street, from Paris; J. Broadhurst, Esq., at ditto ; the Duke and Duchess of Su therland, at Stafford House. from Belvoir Castle ; Sir John Hobhouse, in Berkeley-square, from Corsham Wells; Lord Charles Fitzroy, at Burlington House, from Euston Hall, Thetford ; Sir Windham Anstruther, Bart., from a conti nental tour ; Colonel Fitzgibbon, in Belgrave-square ; Major and Mrs. Currie, in South Audley-street, from Paris ; Lord Onslow, from Clandon Hall, Surrey ; Mr. Philip Howard, M. P., in Brook-street, from the Dowager Countess of New burgh's seat, Hindon Hall, Arundel, Sussex; the Hon. Wil liam Cowper, M. P., in South-street, from Windsor Castle; the Earl of Euston, in Grosvenor-place, from a tour; Lord Duncannon, in Cavendish-square, from Windsor ; Lord Strangford, in Harley-street, from Ashford, Kent ; the Earl of Scarborough, in South-street, from his seat, Brandon-park, Suffolk ; Col. Vaughan, at Fladong's Hotel. DEPARTURES. - - The Earl and Countess of Hardwicke, from Norfolk-street, on a visit to Sir Robert Peel, at Drayton Manor ; Mrs. Ve soy, from Gordon's Hotel, Albemarle -street, for Hampton Court Palace ; Sir James and Lady Fitzgerald, for the Con tinent; the Earl of Altamont, from Mansfield-street, for Pa ris; the Earl of Newburgh, on a visit to the Countess of Newburgh, at Slindon Hall, Sussex; the Rev. Mr. and Lady Cecil Delafieid, for ditto ; Sir Wathen Waller, Bart., for his marine villa, at Hastings; Sir Charles Hastings, Bart., for Wellesley Hall, Derbyshire ; Lord and Lady Mahon, from Grosvenor-place, on a visit to Lord Suffield, at Gunton Hall, Norfolk ; Mr. Newton, from Pall-mall, for Eldon Hall, Nor folk ; Hon. and Rev. H. Cholmondeley, from Batt's Hotel, Dover-street, for Kent ; H. Abdy, Esq., from ditto, for Clay bury Hall, Essex ; W. H. Hartley, Esq., fro.n ditto, for Kent ; W. P. Harnond, Esq. , from ditto, for Cambridgeshire ; Major Estcourt, from ditto, for Bath ; Messrs. Fitzgerald and Butler, from ditto, for Sandhurst. UNIVERSITY INTELLIGENCE. CAMBRIDOE, JAN. 10..--. on Thursday, the 4th inst., the Rev. Strickland Charles Edward Neville Rolfe, M. A., was instituted to the vicarage of Heacham, in Norfolk, on his own petition. At an ordination, held by the Lord Bishop of Hereford, in the cathedral church of Hereford, on Sunday, the 31st of De cember last, the following gentlemen of this University were ordained : DEACONS. Alfred Adcock, B. A., Clare-hall. Edward Bickersteth, B. A., Sidney Sussex College. John Levett Bennett, 8,A., Corpus Christi College. William Rowlands Evans, B. A., Christ's College. Henry Thomas Hill, B. A., Corpus Christi College. William Henry Headly, 8.A., Caius College, (By Letters Dim. from Bishop of Norwich.) Edward Winnington Ingram, 8.A., Trinity College. Henry Edward Lour, B. A., Trinity College. John James Slially, 11. A., Christ's College. PkrEsTs. Thomas Hugh Bird, M. A., Magdalene College. William Peete Musgrave, B. A., Trinity College. It is rumoured that the Duchess of Orleans is in a fair way to make an addition to the Royal Family. The reigning Duke of Brunswick arrived at Hano ver on the 4th instant, on a visit to the King. The Duke of Wellington joined a party at Drayton Manor on Thursday. Lord Templetown has purchased a mansion in Berkeley-square, and in a few days his Lordship will quit Whitehall-place. _ _ Lord William Powlett returned to town early in the week from Raby Castle, the seat of the Duke of Cleveland. Lord and Lady Suffield arrived in town on Thurs day evening from Gunton Park. The Hon. Richard Wellesley leaves town in March as an attache to the Embassy to Stutgard. Lord and Lady Petre have arrived in town, in order to be present at the nuptials of Miss Anna Maria Petre to Mr. Hughes. The Countess of Chesterfield is now considered out of danger. Her Ladyship's complaint has been inflammation of the lungs, and a more severe attack has seldom been expe rienced. Lieutenant-Colonel Harcourt is one of the officers destined for Canada, and we understand Lady Catherine in tends to accompany him. The gallant Colonel has not been married above three months. Alderman Lucas, with his usual liberality, has con tributed 1001. in aid of the Building Fund of the Royal Naval School. This is in addition to his former donation of the same amount to the general funds of the institution. Mr. Bramston has been entertaining a large party at Screens, including the Lord Lieutenant of the county and Viscountess Maynard, Mr. and Mrs. Houblon, Mrs. Drum mond and family, Mr. and Mrs. Hall Dare, &c. all of whom were present at the Chelmsford county ball, which was at tended by about 150 of the leading families in the neigh bourhood. Weymouth is this winter honoured with the resi dence of many families. On Monday Colonel Howard gave a splendid dinner to a large party of his residence on the Royal Terrace, and in the evening Mrs. Howard enter tained nearly the whole of the Gentry residing there. Sir John Hawkins, Al's. Young, and many others hare had large parties. HELE OF WisDom.—Of the very ancient family of Hole, fruitful as the county of Devon is known to have been in distinguished houses, it may with truth be stated, that it was one of the most eminent, the most widely spread, and the most affluent, which even that quarter of England could boast of. When Matthew Hele, Esq., of Holwell, served as Sheriff of Devon, at the time of the Restoration, the branches of the family were so numerous, and all of such good estate within the county, that he assembled a Grand Jury, repre senting the body thereof, and seldom under twenty, all of his name and blood, gentlemen of estate and quality ; which made the Judge observe, when he heard Hele of Wisdom, Esq., called, a gentil seat in the parish of Cornwood, that he thought they must be all descended from Wisdom, in that they had acquired such considerable fortunes."—Burhe's Commoners, Part 15. PLATED DINNER SERVICE, consisting of four Meat Dish Covers, four Corner Hash Dishes with four covers, to fit, and a small Epergne, all with silver e d ges , are o ff ere d com plete, for Twenty-five Guineas, or may be had separately, as follows : The four Meat Dish Covers The four Corner Dishes, with covers (when required the covers can be used as extra dishes). 8 0 The small Epergne T. COX SAVORY, Work*. Goldsmiths, Silversmith, &c., 47, Cornhill, London (Seven Doors from Gracechurch-street). N.B. The Epergne may be had with four arras for Three Gui neas extra. BIRTHS. - - -- - -- -• On the 10th inst., the lady of Alexander Atherton Park, Esq., of a son. On the 9th inst., in Chester-street, the lady of H. Norman, Esq., of a son. On the Bth inst., at Ramsgate, the lady of F. F. Beamish, Esq.. M.D., of a son. On the 10th inst., at Hackney, Mrs. Daniel W. Lucas, of a son. On the 9th inst., the lady of Elias Mocatta, jun., E sq ., of a daughter. MARRIED On the 9th inst., at Twickenham, Mr. Priest, of Parliament street, to Mary Ann, eldest (laughter of Mr. Bennett, of Twicken ham. On the 9th inst , at Sampford Brett, Somerset, Mr. Charles Bailey, of Russia-row, London, and of Hampstead, to Emily Jane* second daughter of 111 r. C Poole of the former place. DIED. On the 28th ult., at Boulogne-sur-Ifer, agel 55, Mrs. Mary Fenton Glenn, relict of .Mr. Glenn, of tho Island of St. Vincent , West Indies. On the 10th of October, at Calcutta, Elizabeth France-„ ,life of L. Carmichael, Esq., of that city, and only daughte:- of the late J. Hughes, Esq., of York-street, Portman-squP.7 o . On the tith inst., aged 80, Mr. Wm. otoffell, of the Three Cranes, Watling -street. On the 6th inst., aged 52, at Stepney-green, Mary Anne, relict of Alr. Iliggs, late of London. On the 9th inst., Mr. John Robinson,' of Bush-cottage, Kings bury, Middlesex, aged 49. London: Printed and Published by MURDO YOUNG, of N°. 112, Strand, at The Sun °See, Na. 112, Strand, in the coital of Mi ddlesex. —Saturday, January 13, IS3B.