The Sun. — London, England, 1833-02-27 00:00:00

_ -.--- - --- • .. :4. ... . , • -----1. , ....z4 . -4. • . ..." 11 .6......_ ~,..e1 . .... ..- i - Aip ....,... 4, "I/ gooAei‘g ; tit the occurrence 11' . i1Zeiv..„„5i.......2" a, , .....,- _ . N .- '4 `" ).+, •• -14 : - r..." < _ ~, "tra . :Z....,:" . .1". - ' ‘ 0 ." • , „..."' '://'....,"/ i t it h a i standard dr proveofd f h ee o l w ing gu in al )3,--- .--- ,- --.3 ', ar, - 9 ~.. witbout making false . , . , s" ' --8--- - 3 , °4 . account for the tnisf 4. - ,---.- ---... 4 r i , „.„.....-1----....,--A, , s " .--,s -- 4- ?..-... , He did not think that 1 ,ol ,, o •,_ ~ --\\, ...,, 40..... , ) , , ;# 4 --. .. =''., -. 0 .,p.1,- , "„.!/ • .A • ',,- --- , S / '''' - ----, _ ult . were arranged, or abolis. 4; ''l ik , 4 1 • ....' '' .' ' . ' A i „.- • - - . k appeased ; for the House •- 3.- \ ._\ ..-- - .) , 4- :k / Z.........-- Aletnber for Dublin, that ~,- - (-4 / -'''' ‘4,14: , - "//:,/ ~ // 4 ' ~...: 2.7.....1 , 5 ---. ..-- ,,,,f 1 „ ./..,-. • / 7 4 ,, 4 ,_,, A tllllOll WOT gtisfy Ir , 1 - 3:C . V' '- ' 44111 111 ' 11 l 1 ' ll Co \ -.1 0 , - '' - ' I 11,14, 1 .. .) ---t ' 1%. -! 11 , 1 12,.... i II e ,&arl'y teddy, vols. poPi Elva., • "NsT AN CE h. Or, LIFE AS IT IS. Allehard Bentley, New Burlington-street. •\.......(Successor to Henry Colburn.) qoD Just ready, OLPHIN N_ * :wren, _. such a circumstance and ds might,i the the d t i w ire o rei c n n e un t t h r e ie r s e , charges against 'he , :cry which existed in Ireland. even if the tithe system in Ireland shed, that the people would be . had the authority of the Hon. It nothing short of a repeal of the , uld satisfy Ireland.—(Hear, hear.) But without this authority it would scent that it was not the remove. of grievance after grievance that would effect the desired good. No, it was to the want of a respectable middle class iu Ireland, that might be attributed tte dis tresses of that unhappy country.— (Hear, hear.) Mr. SHELL could not agree with some of the state ments, as to matters of fact, made by the Noble Lord ; who did not appear to see the evidence of the learned divine (Dr. Doyle) in the same light as he 1 ( 1 11I ,m r.. M S em he b i e l r ). the evidence ha fi d ,r b o e i e: ,dham absu was nntooottfcaonorfraerectah-iinliPo'hic:sisech.aleTutilitaale-t tion of the respective amount of tithes possessed in Irel and by the laity and the clergy. The former were possessed of only one hundred thousand pounds per annum, whilst the latter laid claim to upwards of six hundred thousand. And hence there was less difficulty in settling the question, because the greater amount, by far, being in the possession of the Church, it might be more readily appropriated by Govern • ment. With respect to the intended measures of Minist e r s regarding the tithe system, of which little or nothing was yet known, he could only declare his opinion, that there would be found to be extreme difficulty in legislating on the subject, unless a speedy argument were come to cn the principle to be adopted. He would admit that Ministers had done much, but they must not stop there—they must not he cont-nt with reducing ten Bishops: he would ask them why let the other ten remain ? He would ask, why stop with a reduction of a Bishop's income from 14,0001. to 10,000/. ? Why should a Bishop be in receipt of a larger income than a Chief-Justice? (loud cries of " Hear.") or of the Lord Chancellor of Ireland ? And why, he would ask, stop with a consideration of the hierarchy ? Until a radical and effectual Reform of the whole system was effected, the agitation of Ireland would continue. He would again ask, were we to have a continuation of the tithe system as at present, or are any of its pro ceeds to be applied to the exigencies of the State and the maintenance of the poer.—(Cries of " Hear, hear.") Lord JOHN RUSSELL would not at that time enter into the various questions which had been brought forward on the presentation of a petition. Questions of the most abstract kind, concerning the nature of Church pro perty, concerning the present position of Ireland, and many other questions with respect to her social condition, had been brought forward, for he must say that Hon. Members did not confine themselves to any particu lar line of argument. His wish was to put it to the House whether it would conduce to the object of presenting peti tions and thereby ascertaining the wishes of the people, thus to take up the time of the House upon purely speculative questions? The Hon. Members for Oldham and Tipperary were discussing questions which could not lead to any practical result, which was shown by the Hon. Member for Oldham stating, three-quarters of the tithes in Ireland were enjoyed by laymen, while the Hon. Member for Tipperary, with much more truth, stated that 600,0001. of the tithes were enjoyed by the clergy, while only 100,000/. found its way to the pockets of the laity. Now could it be useful at present to enter into such discussions ? He thought that it would be most beneficial that, before Hon. Menib is came down and made such statements they would make themselves acquainted with the questions which were before the House. In answer to the Hon. Member for Tipperary, with respect to the question of tithes in Ireland, hr would only say that Government would la we a measure to propose on that subject. The House would not be left without a proposition with respect to them, but how far it would go, and what it proposed to effect, the Hon. Gentleman must at present excuse him from saying: In answer to the other question that had been broacheo, he would only say that when the question of Church Re fit-WI came before the House the Secretary forlreland wouldbe ready to answer any arguments that were then brought for ward. He begged it might be understood, that the time of the House was now to be taken up by presenting petitions, and was not to be taken up by lion. Members making statements which could not lead to any practical good. He would not longer interfere with the presenting of petitions, but having been so particularly called upon, he could not avoid making the statement he had done. Several Members were then sworn in, and the House adjourned shortly after Three to Five o'clock. A Tale of the Present Day. Iliehard In 3 vol s . p os t B vo . Bentley, New Burlington -street. 'Successor to Henry Colburn.) Ilk NEW EDITION. O LLECTIONS of a CHAPERON. , t tit , Th , Edited by Lady DACRE. e 441 /f or di , l \ ENV EDITION of this Work will not be : V ery fill SATURDAY next. A R ic h ard B ent l ey , N ew B ur li ngton-street. tAialf (Successor to Henry Colhurn.) ,!), Scotland, Messrs. Bell and Bradfute, Edinburgh; ,rd,trer Ireland M. John Cumming, Dublin. Ijoittil'c receiv e d , by r e very respectable Bookseller in the IN QUEEN'S DRAWING-ROOM. NA i "' COURT JOURNAL of Saturday, li a o rc h 2. will contain the fullest particulars of the , 1 ,4 f '',_ DRAWING ROOM, with a COMPLETE ii'itli°o„t" P RESENTATIONS, DRESSES. &c , on 'Poi i oats' PRESENTATIONS, an ADDITIONAL HALF-SHEET will tated ,11 1 . W ITHOUT EXTRA CHARGE. ltiii;°,;4ls Number will also contain a variety of inte- I l i ta l . ,rißinal Papers and Fashionable News. iie 4 :, 4 ned for H Colburn, by W. Thomas, at the office, k ' l l , s il "4%6:lle:street, Strand ' ; and sold by all Booksellers Nt----- IThi 4 WORK BY MRS. CHARLES GORE. l ib day was published, in 3 , v015. post Bvo., t' S KETCH-BOOK of FASHION. Il t pY, the A ut h or o f " Mothers and Daughters, " and ti ?„ i t of May F a i r ." .4rest m e in my motley ; give me leave (I,,Peak my mind, I will through and through " r de the foul budy of th' infected world." kAs You LIKE IT. k)4,,1.l CONTENTS. .. I ' n n t . h The Old and the Young Bachelor. ,11,1 4 .. a e rri Co a g u e n t ry. A The Intr ce igante. anuvrer Outwitted. `i ll rd Bentley, New Burlington-street. (Successor to Henry Colhurn.) k '-' POST-OFFICE LONDON Dl k , RECTORY for 1838, 1 .41 List of 22,000 Merchants, Traders, &c., of 4 14 ,, tfth ei Lund , n. and Parts Adj cent.' ' , l4th, hard Mayor, and Court of Aldermen. 44Z, Coatnintrys Pl ' an L k o e n r d s, on with the Bankers they draw on in Y : Pm i . j e 4 1 , je Notaries. til'ci ` - '° l l and Country 'Newspapers, with the Places and 1 0 rtli., blictlon. *qte otf Land Navy Agents, Directors of Fire and Life In. '4 'l) , Po l ,!. l . o ndon, West India and East India Dock Compa. :tp,pti'i'gri Ministers, &c. &c. k i Nl4 b ' Ir 2formation reng to the Post-office, &c. to ; c o Y Sinapkin and Coo., Stationers'-court ; Sherwood k''. I: p aternoster-row ; and all other Booksellers. I t ; C d. ; or , with the Coach and Carriers' Guide, IttST REFORMED PARLIAMENT. 'Ohm , i,,, . T A h i HCR OFT'S PARLIAMEN -6q,11, k i , - , i `q 7 CHRONICLE, embracing impartial, re- N' o uthentic Reports of the Speeches delivered in ~ ,,i l l4° , in the first Reformed Parliament, published i t , l 'tl; - :,,: i tsdav arid Saturday, in Nos., 3d. each, and in talii„:; a tte, at 25., in a handsome royal Rvo. size. lcgtl of. this publication is to supply the people -144 Kingdom wsth the most correct and full :IT Intellig ence , i n th e mos t conven i ent an d fo rm, and at the smallest possible charge. Each p.ng Part will be continuous, to form, at the con )",tthe Session, two ha n d s om e V o lum es o f i m - 'ical reference, interesting to all, worthy the t'r the affluent, and placed, by its price, within Of the most limited means. The Debates are te4ter length than in any other periodical ; and I t i tti n all great Questions will be collected and at-. ‘ °1 11: 1 1. 7 the moat scrupulous regard to accuracy. 'f i ',CROFT'S PARLIAMENTARY CHRO (i' r first7Number of which was published Wed '''' GO is printed on a new and beautifully clear :p i -Pressly for the work ; each Number will con ) a t 441 average quantity of Debates of three News ,'t ibtParly one-eighth their price, without 'hat ex ,Akta ligation which is found necessary for their O 1 Pe ' 'ii,l::ll' Edition in small 4to. is published at the same Nii,,trs 6d. ea c h, an d M on thl y P ar t s , 4 s . 1 11 , 1 •l Published by A. N or th cro ft, 96, Chancery \ h ' i d bty all Books e llers, Stati o n e r s , an d N ews - C tid on, Liverpool, Manchester, Birmin g h am , ' Leeds, Sheffield, and every other town in the 'Vow,. LONDON, WEDNESDAY EVENING, FEBRUARY 27, 1833. (No. 12,626.) (PRICE 713.) IM RIA L PA RLEAM ENT (THIS DAY, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 27. HOUSE OF COMMONS. Mr. O't , „ to the t h e y wet c la y ' La b o uring co s , theirnioll 0 ,on, to Woe was Pc' s° he countrYa' Xiend (l A f n s o , xerrion s a cou ntr, er e creatural would Init. d at last red there ', e The o ci• did not r ,wards ! ye felt ar.) t he ropy i n „0,11 a repro of teethe, atry bY h et, after 30 ° 0 set t ile o li for r stoo d u : fit e. If as IV ee -s o/ —( Ch inks to A 3 Jtr , ause, an d the ri to 4 4 it had . „s. Ashlel' , L ere cra c t a to effee SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. RACES APRIL. Newmarket Craven 8 Caistor 9 Catterick Bridge Holdernese Hunt lO Bath Spring. l7 Malton lB Newmarket Ist Spring 221 0 COME. JULY. Liverpool (Aintree) Newmarket July Cheltenham Newcastle.under-Lyne Goodwood lo AI GI:sT. York August Worcester Leeds 14 Wolverhampton MAY. Clifton and Bristol Newmarket 'd Spring Chester 6 York Spring Liverpool (Maghull) l5l Epsom Manchester 2lti rid t" to se e., t deal o `, oLor d 1 , neeting 1 10' id Fair! 01_ ()use of ' is a grea t to f thanl o it was dig ilea COP- 0.0 Sadler 13c ci erp much I° . l i 'lien, o "`,, un--( 11° ,0 n iall towlerle,, 'ductio n Rich a' ,, t ip, se were •§ ll '« yeti p hea r. , 4 aware ti v i of unaniro VER Y OFFICE, No. 138, REGENT „, ABOUT TWEN T Y DOORS FROM uA DRANT. 14:equence of the National Improvements „ W eht.end of the Town making it requisit e t o '"e ho uses at Ch ar i ng -cross, BIS H ' S West he4,,jeinoved to No. 138, REGENT-STREET, , 1 4 ‘.ETS and SHARES are now on Sale for t e i3 O NV IMPROVEMENT LOTTERY, which - ed all in one Day, 17th April. , et PRESENT PRICES. 1., 0 . ........ .... £6 16 0 Eighth CI 16 6 .......... 10 6 Sixteenth OlB 6 " Shares are al Po on Sale at BISH'S Old Office, No, 4, CORNHILL. * Schemes Gratis. ' tI CCEDANEIT-11 FOR FILLING DE jEETfI without Heat or Pressure, and IN. IBLE ARTIFICIAL TEETH, without ,ftlier Ligatures. J EW{ AIALLAN and SONS, Sur- D entists, No. V, GREAT RUSSELL r,,I.OOMSBURY, and 9, HALF-MOON- Ie CADILLY, grateful for the high and 'age which has so eminently distinguished .l exertions since their arrival in the British ; 4 1 3 ectitilly announce to their Friends and the 'rZ,, er al, that they still co n ti nue to restore DE. 1 44, 3 / 4 TH, with their celebrated MINERAL CUM, so u n i versa ll y recommen d e d b y the 4 ( 1 0n and Paris. The operation of Filling led in a few seconds, without the slightest ,a' Pressure. They also FASTEN LOOSE j n anner singularly efficacious, and SUPPLY I'ARTIAL SETS of TEETH formed of the 110 DIBLE MINERAL, or of Natural Sub 't WIRE or other LlGATURES—guaren every purpose for Articulating and Masa . as in Paris. ' ate Of respectfully invited to witness the suc tne Mineral Succedaneum. eat with grid; h e cou , j, than of so`., o f this o ; al could, je o the rlu e ' t iy It strol l g Led to 4 0 4 ioi f overo'cici rkWrigt' work ‘ 4l o l.it rtione cl , c t ige all . er to had hi t • -e to th e leatha m anta 3et ,, i ' o , us be o • E tc e h I res wh i arliaru e 1, reduc e t o nt ot yeti O he :' ~9 but ' our lour The 11 ° , 1 ,' aiplor o (L suPP't 11a2 P OOR MAN'S COUGH DROPS. , 6 i of th ese D rops h av i ng b een atten d e d a 'l, l l success in relieving Pectoral Aff ect i on ., td To t o, 'eels that he is warranted in introducinz tY ex tensively to public nrttice :--wherever s e b e en approved • Ar / 7 4 found most efficacious in the cure of °t vi,",etions of th e Ch es t, accompanied with (tr.:zing. A teaspoonful taken occasion ' . troublesome. Cough, promotes easy eul 4l° N't-s diffic u lty o f Br e a t hin g , an d relieves 11 r of the Chest, which usu illy Complaints. It is well adapted ~''utotnY it may be freely given. Price 1 4 4 t1i . 'O ri ',: 1 ° 1 Y included ; or in large Bottles, equal % .1 %),,A1.1';' 2 9. 9d. each. Also .t tki' 4 l'l', 4 lENT ANTIBILIOUS PILLS, and those Comp'aints arising from 4 e t 111 1 1 31/ .. l,, o ruieh andß een-rally termed l ' l 4,„° l JS or NERVOUS. 1 11 , 4 i ' ol ' it long period been extensively used. pe. so k ,' eta valuable remedy for Bilious 4eot 4l ' th:ti°ll, Haiiitual Costiveness, Nervous 1 . 1 ) , liscases proceeding from Dyspepsia, tieget 't 4 'o 4 :°ded with Loss of Appetite, Si c k . Stomach l anhe " and Bowels, Nausea, ai 141 Purred Tongue, Stupor, and otter :7 °s lit atl-Ymptomq. " 4 4 s *l (teg Y adapted to persons of sedentary -t Y • Ni , en, Dyspepsia. They sti ii -.eat produces 'b/e-1 Pr ep4rat:on, may be used with per i b y (,)tkitZll4l4rY easeti of disordered stomach and itill vonfioennt , nt. Being purely .t 4 11,1' t hfV may he used, without hes' a• tt;t 4 4 1 ' l ‘4 4 They form a valuable FAMILY preferable to those nau -4,i ".t'ilds kit, Which are commonly used. 44 ' 6 ( and in large Bottles, I ls. ''tCh',7'lltr‘ee,'", Apothecary and Chymist, 3, 0 ti LO D°. ?e ith °l 't r—r and sold by most o f t h e t ugist, a Venders of Paent 14 a , e'tt g Brit s ain ; nd and Wholesale by tAr Butler, Newbury, 4 Euttoll he h°°i3 had t 3 is su et the 11° 0 fro oe' him r, hear C a t tad 3 S is Pa tt n o re , n the r,O O a nd 50„ lete. in „ el g ate, 3sso t , vor, hid' '''.° the olccti4 of st. h ter• o f &lig [Off ir• _ vatlN of ler 80a, r 9 : 4 1 W. -allO3, iedif P 'OIC , "ce ° II wiaow .iaua~ ,our d 3 ':;e ll office, DY ----- •" jo c• 0 is t ,A e (- , .ers in London puhlicat . LI be , v,,h ountry Bankers, with the Bankers they draw c Iced not sa w , sof al public in they 00 v eil ! I, 4l ),,i•ond„Notarles. c 0 0 6,,„ t,a44% t , 1 k `tha e l_id Country Newspapers, with the Places antinued ad been d e '", de°. I si L e rtov a 0t1.„,?.t% f t ry, / el' k ti t , Off ice ,. my Agents, Directors of Fire and Life irides 0 ot, 4 1, t ie , o s. lie language eL LA. t; ro lei ',.: ndei, West India and East India Dock Cot Mr. O'C'°""•to, 4 iit t4l VI Ministers, &c. &c. “.iformation relating to the Post-offi & Post-office, c, ice to weretile'a'ro-til' krti)?l,Sitnepkin and Co., Stationers'-court ; Sher% y they , 13 ,0, j •a, l tis. t c ,,a . t , rnoster-row ; and all other Booksell l a hourtligl e rst .e i:, d tbe irrnot e u i for, 1 , h c : • or, with the Coach and Carriers' Gu J on , to fe 0 04 ,_ 'id. e was pC03,111., FIR, REFORMED PARLIAMENT. :he coutitrY,l•3giF ,0•,1' Friend (L e !., b oy",l'A ' HCR OFT'S PAR LIAME exertions ti ls F, L i Dv .o t ••• CHRONICLE, embracing impartial, , acountr_Y:,,ce.r, t, ss h lt, tl , 4 l ,4 'uthenti c Reports of the Speeches delivered -oreaturcs epi, .i, : 0 , / I ,i _ cf, 11, it . ,7t , d ' e n l' e , ad in , th e first Reformed Parliament, publis would Id at last vita lJ ,'ll 4 l rt ar ,_a3 and Saturday, in Nos., 3d. each, and ared thercuie V, t l Vhi gn ` e s at 25., in a handsome royal Rvo. size. ) The s° ,.ci,t l ii,Vtit,i °I . , this publication is to supply the pec le did not • s o, ~, 4 'et lt Kingdom wsth the most correct . and solution, urged, At i lit , , , I rY Intelligence, in the most . . convenient 1 towards ti":felt A e tik t - an ' ° ,i r m, and at the ' smallest possible charge. E; lear.) .0 1 00 %7, lot k i t of 'l'..e art will be continuous, to form, at the ci thropY ' ,cll l° _,di I lp or t tle Session, two handsome Volumes of i tue a rer i f:": b o e cri iL a st vk it t c i f ti fal reference, interesting to all, worthy Rs of or , i lot a ' i ll ef t he th affluent,. and placed, by its price, witl tuntry DY e most limited means. The Debates ii atter 3 10 , 1 'e/ilN''ktbitt'oeater length than in any other periodical ;' to set tl' e-l r • yer stood " P pc , , t r 4 , l tiit. '' all great Questions will be collected and a s 4 , Jll, ii t h „w as far es .; 04 . ,, il l , 5 moat scrupulous regard to accuracy. me. .-(Clle , 4 , t c il `'ROFT'S PARLIAMENTARY . C . EIR i : i f ie D h eb w a a t s es , 1 , Ila r• of published threex \ e ir v t gr. a li t ,4:11 ,: i a ll iv r e s r ti - a N ge um gi b m e n r t o it f y w o l hanks to olio • 4 , c itt 0, , and the., Ili, ~, p6 ,) is printed on a new and beautifully et sled d aus t e o coe, 4 p„ .1,3 Ls., ressly for the work ; each Number will cc at it ha 4, I,s tj:i 4111. 5 . r a y one-eighth their price, without 'hat € rd Ashlel` ' ,act t i, a o' o ,i lt. t 'l tion which is found necessary for th en of were cr uri . l t i sP l, : t 'iot• dic toea., ~, ,k l ,l Th Edition in small 4to. is published at the sat it hc!,,? :N I: . 1 :, 6d. each, and Monthly Parts, 4s d to seOnf'oo-'"At , 1 41 tot._ioblislied by A. Northcroft, 96, Chancer eat deal e y oltll • u L ° by all Booksellers, Stationers, and New the Lord I t ' D t ai tt i' \ • t , 'an, Liverpool, meeting DO it o f t, tk , , e _ i Manchester, Birminghai had said tha t .4 o l Kin g d' o e ds, Sheffield, and every other town in t o f Ce~ - t.. 1 • 'I , House t/ 0 o p ! ~ L 0 was a grea t o p , 1• llt t , IlErty o f than ° 0111 \iit q, OFFICE, No. I 38, REGEN' ABOUT , (4 u4III TWENTY DOORS FRO it it y 3. 5,04 ,1 ' ANT. 'obie3 rul k :p t A, i , t `Wise L th e pence of the National Improvemen r. Sadler v rise v l / 4 , i: ve mu ch l ° s oll itN Oti V "t•end of the Town making it requisite s otli ,ci . ,the houses at Charing-cross, BISH'S Wes Then, ~,,3 f, tk ill Aion--( o ` u f eib7kl/QxreinoVed to No. 13S REGENT-STREE• i i -, ni 3 : pe t ,/ 'l4 z ETS and SHARES ' are now on Sale f knowledkoo•-,,, 1 -.Ow ,„ _ t e i ded IMPROVEMENT LOTTERY, whit reduction tigil;,,, all in one Day, 17th April. much 0 $ J O', lieket PRESENT PRICES. case w err .4§ ll .A i t b li . , £l2 12 0 I say, ~, i 'vo oi se ' Ac 44'; ........... £6 16 0 i - ar, hear. ') 0 0 ' l f \le 44 . ........ 310 6 I i l ft h e t e l l ' ith C O I 18 16 6 6 Ly awa re eno f ji a otili , t t , , rydotlcares No, also on Sale at BISH'S 0 any ),, , i "' e, IN R. 4, CORNHILL. *,,* Schemes Gratis. ed unanieWii" i r ,,,,A1,, co s ,tiri , 4 )lk tt % T S E tJ E CCEDANEUM FOR FILLING DI ()b i TH, without Heat or Pressure, and II ed with gr, d sc hat lie c 0 1" p3 l ' )0 n „ FIL E ARTIFICIAL TEETH, withot hation of s .. ec c ol 4 1\igi t ier,,kizatures. ts of this '' - d 0 v alori rp . h , R tk , srl.l) U a MALLAN and SONS, Sin I, Gould, to the quotily fot i Ni4 , Lentists, No. 32, GREAT RUSSELL I felt stroll,triotig.,lN ,D I POAISBURY, and 9, HALF-MOON C CADILLY rtflf a•ned to 1 , - c ol il eti l lekhtr eca . sgae u or the high an bringing t 4ilePa, Vi o „ ,ge which has so eminent! disti • sh of oye rsce., is",4o, , L " 41 exertions since their arrival . y in . the ng ß u r i •itis e Arkwril o `; Oel l 'fil; ;"Pectitilly announce to their Friends and th irk \ r ner al, that he w or: 4l ' e tit, iftss , is p t ,„.. 1.1 at . they still continue to restore DE portione d d c e 5 ,: 1 ,: 4.1 T N t with their celebrated MI r age a" e rto ,Atililf e IJAL so NERA; I had b ith ~,a 1 , k,:t, t. em _ n universally recommended by th tire to the o 'o' t,tcfoth,"° inand Paris. The operation of Fillip titi g )l i . or - 4er! a few seconds, without ' f deaths ""'the slightet manufactOvisdl:kitttl44l)lP.ressure. They also: FASTEN LOOS] t i e i psq ]( ii I, 'tinersingularl yefficacious, and SUPPLI [emus. , i b l i e ct , 0 Lt t , (:', N A kr. t. r i7 , v , ll/ 10 . I AL SETS of TEETH formed of th isures v , Parlianletnv De l :A l l ( 11 0 , bIBLE MINERAL, or of Natural Sub o reduce oa or e : i t L t i\,., ^4 te•,, t WIRE or other LIGATURES-guarPn ely you cl,, a , 40.1, -• ev e , . ki ,t 6 keg as in purpose for Articulating and Masti cc;" but "`",, ° e hour Ir df C" Nli - ' llt Y 4 in Paris. The o a o t . ,c 4lt et . a re respectfully invited to witness the suc T imploriatot•sl iiik, the Mineral Succedaneum. in suPla' rt t Pe t 06 v 11 % OR MAN'S COUGH DROPS. „gi „tit., t' , eof txcii 04 tt, IN uth these Drops . having been attended tat he ' 1 "'" ''' ' l % ° llt. ta le had _v 111 I . r ueeess in relieving Pectoral Affection., I as sue" o c ' it k t h tl t. ; IN, t els that he is warranted in introducine If the I V 0 ;•It a L ‘'/' h-' e xtec . fro oe 4 0 i \ k l v t ten sively to public notice :-wherever c him approved. ear, hear.) , to sk liC w,, k ‘ ti : ,t,n o f a st r: o 4 , 4 4 t l ,) t'l, , q 4kft ectio otlnd most efficacious in the cure of : h h i a:d part resc o et:t:,ll,, , ,, , ,lt \ k l o„:.:zi 2 n s g o . f the Chest, accompanied with 1 in th e P o p 19 A teaspoonful taken occasion tt, and 5 0 4, to p \') 4„, • t troublesome Cough, promotes easy view , . 0 o o s ''i li,i q ll ttai' t) " , ll difficulty of Breathing, and relieves psgate, albs ~,; , ,,,,,, , , „41,,, P . p re,,,i0,. ot the Chest, which usu illy Jaya , ' ,b 's Ili, to 4 rY Complaints. It is well adapted sting e" /cV ytti, ‘‘11c,,,, • . „, eit WWI i ,t,, it may be freely given. Price "„ 00. 14 ti,,, , 2 tY included ; or in large Bottles, equal wh ich s°- ,0 0 tl‘ttithis* 9 d• each. A Ist, - 11, lit t , 1 10,, ENT ANTIBILIOUS PILLS, nd th e 1°- , t t i , tt t, 4 ~e 4t ;Ind those Comp'aints arising from .i b t ; t t 'ili l krinacla and B i.• el., een-rally termed of st.•7te t tt ' t til N t :lil l 'ist, f ° Ol l7 S or NERVOUS. n., FA , h tel'• o f RI ii, 1, 1 st t i t a long period been extensively used. o d daug ~ f t .‘o t ,, dk. 4t,d „is Gaul le ' ~, q 1 ,4. ) 1t) 41 . 4t 4tor valuable remedy for Bilious De. > oon' O ,, 41 ) , ili e d i . , Haidtual Costiveness, Nervou. f Henry A 4'il l i tl 'ty ) N i ktt,, a ," , ases proceeding from Dyspepsia, felt t t , tl i , 4 i t , 'led with Loss of Appetite Siel 1 ,1 1 1 v Y 41 the gict ,a ,tia it, t, 4 p,„ 4 4 , 1 Stomach and Bowels, Nausea, i mr. rao 1 ...; ~,, N th vurr e d Tongue, fan, 0f .% t'lltl Opt tit ) , l ' , ,, ii l ia . v °'.ri l ' 4 ftt Al tt,,,41), Y,niPtoins. her s o if y ' p y i t t , ti g . h ce _soapted to persons of sedentary l on yea r ' 0 3 0: 4 1 1 bl 4 4 4 0,P,1 ~'"q eu t produces Dyspepsia. They o nly 29 wo e e re,;•4l , r t e Pratt a 1... oy ,ok li t i 'try 4 .13n t may be used with per- t SosaDna, e ,. Auk N o , 11 te cures of disordered stomach and ad. s oar OW, kbor t . iti, no ( . 0 f „ te nor- pg ., 7 4,., ~ , i0 I ,_ , 1), n ioement. Being purely of clerk:, t pc li sit ~ , k, , nfy Ina b :rvice on ~, 4 , 4,_ N They . y e used, without htsita. _ ide ric 0 4 to 114.n1c a re e)' form a valuable FAMILY lariana,i., Aftlic,„4l),4ls,2,,i),'.',,qatice,c,ltell.y..preferable to those nau- iy tOsq daye L Vi t ' ll, , ti 9d, es , `"“llto are commonly used. ,ptottio, ettk , otv y, 3 ~, it,. 6(1., and in large Bottles, AI te• 'l t ill t v 1 ... l „/vir it, €•,,, a,,,, each. y 0 1 . 1 14,, 4 44 th_Ya l ,Jr a t, t ' ,A,,.pothecary avid Chymist, 3, L0r400:4 ' 4 ',u this ' . k m ~;_, lin, and sold by most of the Soon after twelve o'clock, the SPEAKER 400 k the Chair; at which time there were upwards of a hundred Members in the House. The unusual hour of assembling appeared to have some effect on the deliberations of the House, as the SPEAKER had occasion, during the first half hour, to call the Members to order very frequently. The Norwich and Wootton Road Bill, Saltash Road Bill, the Ipswich and Otley Road Bill, and other private Bills were read a second time. Committee named for the Sutton Bridge and Bury Road Bills. Mr. HALL presented a petition from the borough of Newport, in Monmouthshire, for the repeal of the win dow tax ; and petitions from the same place for the repeal of the Septennial Act, and in favour of vote by ballot. Colonel FOX presented a petition from Tavistock, for the abolition of slavery. Mr. GODSON presented petitions from Letterworth, and other places in Leicestershire, for the abolition of slavery; and expressed his entire concurrence in the prayer of the petitions. SLAVE EMMANCIPATION. Mr. GODSON also presented a petition from James Window, of Westminster, containing a plan for the gra dual abolition of slavery. The Hon. Member, however, believed it to be a plan that would not please either side. As connected with the West Indies, he felt called upon to declare, that the West India interest was most desirous of having the question settled, and that whilst the present Ministry was at the helm. Mr. COBBETT bad no doubt but there would be many schemes brought before the House, containing, like this, a proposition for taking money from one party to satisfy the claims of another. It the five millions which this plan would take nut of the pockets of the veople were once to be disbursed, he would be glad to know when or how it could be got hack again. When ever compensation was talked of, it was always contem plated to take it out of the taxes wiung from an overtaxed people. He should on some future occasion have to bring before the House a case of compensation, upon which was committed the most flagrant robbery that ever dis graced the annals of any country. Mr. GODSON,althongb he did not believe the plan would be adopted, could not admit that it was so objectionable as the Hon. Member for Oldham appeared to think. The money was proposed to be raised by debentures, and the labour of the slaves would repay the interest, at least, and in time reduce the principal. This was a petition from a gentleman connected with the West Indies, and if not considered to be feasible, would no doubt he followed by many ethers, from which the House might be enabled to make selection ; and between extreme plans steer a mid dle course. Mr. HARVEY thought that every scheme which was brought before the House, having for its object the eman cipation of slaves, was entitled to serious consideration ; but it seemed that in the consideration of the subject, com pensation and emancipation were confounded, whereas they were wholly distinct; and, indeed, emancipation should precede compensation. But there was an objection to the scheme proposed by the petitioner, even greater than that raised by the Hon. Member (Mr. Cobbett), for Oldham, for it proposed that the debentures that were to be granted were to be liquidated by the slaves themselves, and then they were to he left to purchase their own freedom-- (Hear.) The owners of the slaves, as they religiously called themselves, would no doubt submit some simil Sr proposition to the House; b u t i n hi s (M r. H arvey ' s) opinion, if any persons were entitled to compensation it was the slaves themselves.--(Hear.) Dr. BAI.DWIN said the proposed scheme was, that compensation should be paid by the slaves out of their earnings after paying for their own support, hut as a great portion of the labouring classes of England and Ireland were unable to support themselves by their labour, he did not know how the slaves were to maintain them selves and save sufficient to enable them to liquidate the debentures.—(Hear.) The gentleman who proposed such a scheme should insure the lives of the slaves, and then how would the effect be if the cholera got among them ? (Laughter.) It was an insult to humanity and to the rights of mankind to suppose that slaves ought to be hound to purchase their freedom from those who ought never to have exercised any control over their liberty.—.(Hear.) Mr. BERN AL regretted that such a discussion should have taken place upon this subject on the mere presentation of a petition.—(Hear.) With the proposed scheme of Mr. Window he had nothing to do, nor would he now discuss its merits ; and he regretted that the good, plain, working sense of the Hon. Member for Colchester (Mr, Harvey) should have induced him to depart from his usual course; and when a question of such moment was not regularly before the House, have led hint to join in the war cry that had been unjustly raised against what he would still call thetn—a most respectable body of men, v:z., the West India pro prietors.—(Hear.) If the property in slaves were a pro perty which had been iniquitously held and unjustly enjoyed by that class, he would ask, had it been their own fault? Had it not been recognised and encouraged by legislative enactments ?—( Hear, hear.) And was it just, when the question was shortly to be brought forward in a regular way, to increase the aspersions which had been so improperly raised against the West India proprietors (Hear, hear.) He wished not to appeal to the passions of the House, but when the subject was brought forward in a proper shape, to bring arguments founded upon calm and dispassionate reasoning into discussion. The petition was ordered to lie on the table. Mr. GODSON then presented a petition signed by 1,520 of his constituents (Kiditerminster). Their first prayer was the repeal of the Septennial Act—(Hear)— which questi ,n he would at present refrain from discuss ing. They next prayed the House to repeal or &ter the 27th clause of the Reform Bill. That was a clause which gave powers to overseers to an extent which the House was probably not aware of. He would not refer to ans particular place, as the elections were now over, but he would suppose a possible effect of an operation of the clause. Overseers assumed a number of characters by the Reform Bill. In the first place they might be on a Committee; then they might collect the rates from persons whose opinions were one way, and not from those on the other side until after July; then they could leave out a list of doubtful voters on one side, and lost rt those on the other side, and after all, they could be witnesses before the re vising barrister. The petitioners, therefore, prayed for a repeal, or an alteration of that clause. They next prayed for the vote by ballot; that topic he would not at present enter upon, but would merely state th it 1,520 of his con salteents agreed in the necessity of that measure. The petition was ordered to lie on the table. Mr 11. GRAT FAN presented a petition from the King's County Political Union, praying for the abolition of vestry eess. Also from St. Michael's and St. John's, Dublin arid Cavan, against the coercive measures intro duced by Earl Grey for the tranquilhz ng of Leland. In presenting the latter petition, the Han. Member observed that before such a measure was introduced, the greatest inquiry ou r ;ht to have taken place ; instead of that no in• quay whatever had taken p ace. He (Mr. G.) felt con vinced that the tranquillity of Ire' end could not be brought about by the introduction et bayonets, the taking away of the Trial by Jury, and the introduction of martial law. Mr. RUTIIVEN had t ten requested to support the pryer of the petition. He felt dettst itionand abhorrence tbr the measure introduced by Lord Grey; it was mo e calculated foa Algiers than any Christian country I- was a danind,le atid detestable measure. Ireland was blessed with an ansentee Government, and an absent Dish Secre tary, who was extravagantly paid for what he did by an oppressed and heavy taxed people. His Majesty's Minis. tern, by bringing forward the measure, had increased the Repealers in Ireland. Mr. MORGAN O'CONNELL also supported the prayer of the petition. Mr. WILLIAM FIELD presented a petition from the inhabitant, of Blackburn, praying fur an immediate and total abolition of negro slavery. Mr. TURNER supported the prayer of the petition. Mr. HAWKINS presented a petition from Mackworth Praed, Esq., of the Inner Temple, comphining of gross Interference with the freedom of election in the borough of St. Ives, and praying that the parties who had so acted might be prosecuted. The petition stated, that in the mines in the neighbourhood of the borough, notices had been put up, evidently for electioneering purposes, by which any person working in the mine, if he did not act as the owners wished him, was instantly turned adrift. 11 pe-tions workipe i❑ the mine were compelled to have their goods at certain houses, and such was the syste m of intimidation that was carried on, that the petitioner found that all the persons who voted for him, if labourers, would be deprived of employment, and, if tradesmen, of all their custom. The Hon. Member had no hesitation whatever in saying that the conduct pursued by Lord Lauderdale was highly improper, and against all the rules of the House. As one of the Hen. Members fo:othuaste borough was in th e H ouse , h e (M r . H.) t rus t e d h e would explain the conduct th a t had been pursued, . an d if that explanation was not satisfactory, he hoped the i would institute an inquiry into the subject. Mr. HALSE would answer the appeal made to him by the Hon. Member on the presentation of this petition from Mr. Mackworth Praed. The resolution alluded to in the petition, with respect to the purchase of goods for the mine, was one that had been agreed to by the proprietors, in the year 1830 ; and although printed then, or in 1831, bad never been acted upon in any single instance. At a public meeting on the occasion of the recent election, this resolution was alluded to; and it was only then that he (Mr. Halse) recollected its existence. The Hon. Member then recounted some circumstances that occurred at the election, and among them part of a speech made by Mr. Praed, in which that Gentleman spoke of his pro perty and income, including in the latter an average of 50/. per annum for poetry, and 5001. per annum for law, which excited a little laughter in the House, but from the lowness of the Hon. Member's tone, we could not apprehend the application. The Hon. Member denied that the Noble Lord (Lauderdale) had used any influence at the election, and read a letter he had received from the Noble Lord, which lie (Mr. Hake) stated to be the only communication that had passed between them_.in which letter his Lordship stated that he had been applied to by a number of persons to exert his interest at the election, in favour of Mr. Praed, but bed in every case declared it to be absurd to expect he could entertain any idea of doing so. This, he would repeat, was the only commu nication he bad had with the Nohle Lord. He would wid, that the printed resolution upon which the principal weight of the charge appeared to hinge, was without date or signature ; and that it was customary, when any thing of consequence was ordered for mines, to have some resolution passed by the managers, authorising the purchase. Mr. HAWKINS said that he was instructed by the petitioner to say that he did not request Lord Lauderdale's assistance. All he had done was to ask Lord Lauderdale to disclaim all knowledge of the notice which was read to the men in the mine, and promise not to persecute any workman, or shopkeeper, in any way for the vote he might think fit to give; but Lord Lauderdale refused to make any such declaration. The peti tion, however, was chiefly against the Honourable Member (Mr. Halse) who denied all knowledge of the notice referred to. Now be (Mr. Hawkins) had the affidavits of several persons employed in the mine, dis tinct y swearing that the notice was read by order of the Hon. Member several times, and on one occasion, in his presence. Of course, as the Hon. Member and Lord Lauder dale had the majority of the shares in the mine and the complete control of it, the circumstance could not fail to have considerable influence with the workmen. Mr. Praed besides drew up a declaration in the most stringent language binding himself not to persecute any man for his vote, and promising, if his opponent would produce and substantiate a single instance of intimidation by himself or friends, to resign his pretensions. He signed this deela. ration, and called upon the Hon Member (Sir. Halse) to do the like, but he refused, and the reason he gave was in these words—" I will not sign this declaration, because it is not fair that a man who, like my opponent, possesses no property in the town, should call upon me, who do possess property in it, to sign a de claration which would effectually prevent my exercising any influence which that property might enable me to exer cise." This was the reason the Hon. Gentleman gave for not putting his name to the declaration drawn up by Mr. Praed, who, nevertheless, himself subscribed it, and took every opportunity of addressing those inhabitants of St. Ives whom the Hon. Member opposite had rather uncourteously designated as the mob---(Hear, hear) —to impress upon them his determination of abid ing by that declaration. He (Mr. Hawkins) knew not what construction the House might put upon these facts, but he had no doubt of the light in which the public would view them. He thought the explanation given by the Hon. Member most unsatisfactory, for he contented himself with impugning the motives of the petitioner without attempting to give any answer to tbegrave charges brought against him. With a view probably to ulterior proceedings, be should move not only that the petition be laid upon the table, but that it be printed. Mr. HALSE—I must state most positively that the petitioner said upon the hustings that he had applied fur the interest of Lord Lauderdale, and added, " I con fess I have failed."—(Hear.) For my own part, I most solemnly declare, in answer to the statem ent of the Honourable Gentleman that I was never present at the reading of the notice to which he alludes, except when it was read upon the hustings, nor was it, that I am aware of, ever read in the mine, except once in the year 1830. I protest, in a manner equally solemn, that I used no undue influence to procure my return. Indeed it was not necessary for me to canvass the borough after July or August, and at the close of the election I had up wards of a hundred majority over Mr. Praed. The petition having been read, Lord J. RUSSELL said, that he apprehended, accord ing to the new rules of the House, the Hon. Member could not move the printing of the petition. He would beg to suggest, that it should be at once referred to the Committee, and without saying any thing upon the merits of the petition, he was ready to promise the Hon. Member all the assistance in his power in bringing the subject forward. Mr. HARVEY said that it was not right in any Hon. Gentleman to state that he had affidavits swearing to cir cumstances which an Hon. Member solemnly contradicted, without producing those affidavits. Mr. HAWKINS—In answer to the observation of the Hen. Member for Colchester, 1 beg to state that I have the affidavit in my pocket. CORPORATION OF LIVERPOOL. Mr. EWART presented a petition signed by a great nunibtr of merchants of Liverpool, upon the subject of the Corporation of that Borough. It was signed at one of the most numerous and respectable meetings of mer chants, sh;powners, a❑d rate-payers that was ever held there, and its object was to obtain a Reform of the Cor poration. The revenues of the Corporation, derived from various sources, amounted to little less than 300,000/. a-year, of which 100,000/. was re- ctived by that body directly, and 180,0001. as having control ever the Dock Estates. By borrowing money on the Dock Esta , es they had raised a million and a half,r,hich they had expended in various buildings in the town. He asked the House, was it proper that such an enormous revenue should be under the almost itT , sponsible control of any certain number of indivicivals ?—(Hear, hear.) The Common Council of Liverpool, who controded that enormous revenue, wirs a self elected body, amounting to forty-one individuals, who elected themselves for life. The Dock Estates were managed by a Committee of twenty-one, the majority of whom were nominated by the Common Gained. The consequence was, there fore, that the corporation had the conuol of those funds —they possessed great influence in the h trough—they had the nomination of all the dere:, in the town and of all officers to the dock estates. They sold lintl as owners of tand in the town, to members oft eir own body, and pur chased hind according to the opinions of the majority of a c inimittee. The patronage and influence thus vested in them they had abused—theyhad even abused their ecclesiasti cal patronage, tty refusing to nominate persons to churches unless they were connected with members of their own body. He appealed to the House whether such abuses were to be allowed, and whether sutffi powers ought to be left in the hands of a self-elected Corporation ? He hoped that the att,nti in of the Committee, now sitting to inquire into the esisting corpor itions, would be peculiarly directed to that of Liverpool. The petition was read, and, on the motion of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman, was orklaed to he referred to the C o mmittee on corporations. Tt e HoN. GENTLEMAN then presented a petition, signed by 1,200 members of the Guardian Society for the Protection of Trade in Liverpool, praying for the abolition of the small receipt stamp duties. H e sa id th ose d ut i es operated very partially —for instan c e, b e h a d k nown a l arge library transferred without b e i ng su bj ecte d t o tiny duty, w hil e the small tradesman cou ld not transact the smallest piece of business without coming und e r th e i r o p era ti ons . The MN. „GEI•MENAN also preseute. , l a petition from an individual named James Hargrave, praying for the abolition of the Corn Laws. Mr. Alderman WOOD gave notice that 'on Friday he would present a petition front the persons engaged in the soap trade in the metropolis, relative to the duties on that article. Mr. O'CONNOR presented a petition from members of the King's Court Political Union against the Grand Jury system in Ireland, and praying for an amendment ;n the system. Mr. O'CONNELL had been requested to support this petition. He considered the jury laws now in contempla tion were a mere mockery. Last year they might have been of use, hut now, when three or five young ensigns were to have all the power thrown into their own hands, of what avail would any amendment be in the jury Lows? The thing was a mockery on the country altogether. If such an atre dons and abominable measure were carried through that House, of what use was it to amend these laws ? He would not in such a case like to be in the situation of English Members when they again went before their con stituents. If they could sit in their seats while such an abominable and atrocious measure was being car ried through the House, they would well deserve the fate they were likely to meet with on that occasion, for a spirit had grown up amongst the people in direct contradiction to the way in which Members were now acting. These were his reasons why he thought it unnecessary that he should now support the prayer of this petition. Mr. AGLIONBY said that it was with the deepest regret that he listened night after night to those attacks on English Members by the Hon. Member for Dublin. The interests of Ireland were as dear to English Members as they were to the Hon. Member himself. V He begged to tell that Learned Gentleman, that when the measure to which he had alluded came before the House, he would attend to it both at large and in detail, and notwithsteud ing the taunts thrown out by the Hon. and Learned Mem ber, he would do his duty upon it, and he believed in so sneaking for himself, he spoke for nine-tenths of the English Members. Mr. TYNTE presented two petitions from places in Somersetshire, praying for the abolition of slavery. Mr. A. SANFORD seconded the prayer of the petition. Mr. JOHNSON presented a petition from Richmond, in Surrey, praying for the better observance of the Sabbath. The Honourable Gentleman said, he would take that opportunity of correcting a false impression which had gone forth to the public as to the intentions of those who were anxious for the success of this measure. They had no intention of limiting the innocent recreations of the poor, but rather to confirm them in those enjoy ments, all they wanted being to protect those tradesmen from ruin who were willing to observe the Sabbath, against those whn had no such feelings. Mr. O'CONNELL said that formerly he had been one of those who objected to the proposed interference of that House, with the observance of the Sabbath ; but the Gentlemen interested in the measure had called upon him and explained their intentions, in the same spirit as stated by the Hon. Member. He entirely agreed with them and they should have his support. Mr. TYNTE supported the petition. Mr. COBBETT said that in this question the in terests of the poor man had been totally overlooked. Almost every poor married man in the country had a piece of gerden, on which lie employed himself on a Sunday morning. A servant in husbandry must obey his master's commands, otherwise the business could never be carried on. How was this to be met by the Hon. Gentleman ? WILDS said, that from information he had received, he must deny that the labourers were so em ployed of a Sunday morning. In many places agricultural servants were not paid by their masters till the Sunday morning. The consequence was, that they were obliged to purchase their provisions on that day, which so un settled them, that the after part of the day was spent in the public houses in gambling. Mr. JOHNSTONE did not think the Hon. Member for Oldham ought to have introduced any objection to the proposed bill at present, as it was impossible for him just now to know what provisions would or would not be in the bill that might be brought forward on this subject. Captain ELLIOTT had a petition to present on the same subject from Kelso, and to the same effect. Mr. COBBETT thought the law as it now stood cn this subject quite sufficient for all useful purposes. He w as quite satisfied no law could be passed to interfere between master and servant which would not lead to confusion which never would be at an end. If a law were to be made whereby servants should not be employed on Sundays, would a cook not immediately say to her mistress that she would not cook the dinner for Sunday ? It was said that the measure was to prevent masters working men servants on Sundays, such a system would be perfectly nugatory, unless it went into private families.—(Hear, hear.) Were gentlemen backward in employing their coachmen, their grooms, and their footmen on Sundays? Why, those were a set of workmen who laboured very hard, in Hyde Park for instance.—(Hear.) They were well dressed up, and looked very fine, but he would be bound to say that if they had their choice they would much rather be at home with the maids.—(Much laughter.) If the House were to legislate between ladies and their maids, there would soon be such a system of legislation introduced in this country as had never been heard of in any country. Mr. HODSON thought the Hon. Member for Oldham was entering too soon upon the nature of the proposed measure. If a measure was to be introduced for the better observance of the Sabbath it ought to have general support.—(Hear, hear, hear.) Before the House condemned a proposed measure of this sort, they ought, in the first place, to know its exact danger. When it should be introduced it should have his best attention ; and he thought it might be so framed as not unnecessarily to interfere between master and servant, so as to prevent the proper recreation of the latter. Captain ELLIOTT presented a petition from the United Associate Congregations of Moorbattle, praying for the total abolition of tithes. Captain WYMES presented a petition from Auchter muchty, in the county of Fife, praying for the abolition of negro slavery. Also a petition front Strathmeghlin, in the same county, to the same effect. Also a petition from Leslie, praying for the total abolition of tb.e Church esta blishment in Ireland, and that its revenues might be applied towards the removal of the present burden of taxation. Mr. COBBETT was much pleased to hear this petition, and be would have been more pleased still, to have found that it included the lay-i , iipropriations. It was the lay impropriations that wanted abolishing. Mr. GILLON presented five petitions, praying for the abolition of Cheich property in Ireland, and for its appli cation to some purposes calcul aril to relieve the burdens of that country from the Political Union of Leslie, and Mom the Protestant Dissenters of Kelso. The Hon. Manlier was convinced that tranquility would never exist in either Ire land or England as bang as those who professed a religion contrary to the Established Church of Ireland were compelled to contribu e so largely to the maintenance ofdoctrines wilt which they could not agree. He trust d that tie time was not far distant when the Itieb Church would be done away with, and that unhappy country placed in a state of tranquil ity. At HON. 111 EMBER, whose name we could not ascertain, begged to .titer toe protest against the doctrine of spolia tion used by the petition. He considered the Church o f Ireland had se much rielit to its property es any gentleman in Etiglend had to his.—(Herr, hear.) ere Was no individuals who paid tithes that was e ntitled to th em , se that if teey Were tak e n aw a y t o . m orrow they wou ld go to the Suite. He trusted, holy ever, that bo h the Ceturches of England anti Ireland wer e placed on too firm a basis to he shaken by every breath that blew. The generality of Dissenters agree w ith the doctrines of the Church of England ; they only differed from it in !Ono and ceremony. Mr. O'DWYER said the Hun. Gentleman who hail just sat down had stated no reason why he, as a Catholic, who did not believ e in the Protestant Church, should contribute to the support of that Church. Tithes had, by Act of Parliament, been transferred from the Catholic Church to t!,e Protestant Church, and he saw no reason why an Act of Parliament cutild not alter that trans enjoyed tithes, th ey susta i ne d t h e i r own church, trans fer..--(Hear, hear.) Wh en the Roman Catholic clergy and supported and educated the poor, and he would recommend to lion. Gentlemen, before they talked of spo liation, to require that those who now enjoyed the tithes should appropriate them properly, and give a portion to the poor. He earnestly entreated of his Majesty's Ministers that in making a Church Reform, they would make it j satisfactory to th t e h t e n epausluAriec. which( Hear they , hear.) He really be had proposed would not give satisfaction—at all events, it would not give immediate relief to the poor population of Ireland.— (Hear ) hear.) The mere taking off of ten L1;11101)1 would do nothing.—(Hear.) Many years ago, Sir Wm. Petty when the Catholic population of Ireland was much less than at present, said that two Bishops for Ireland were sufficient, but for his own part he thought that even two were too many.—(Laughter.) Contrasting:the Protestant population of Ireland with that of England, he believed that the Bishops who would be left by the plan of Minis ters, would he by far too many.—(Hear.) Mr. P. BARRON said that he would plead guilty to the charge that his ancestors had enjoyed too great a portion of Church property, but they supported the poor. He charged the Protestant clergy with a gross tta d ern u si pdt c al a ecn t ,r e ti d m , e a . n d Thehad th Protestant e re by dri s n t a t b h i e j s m h rn t o e n p t o f p r l t r y e , l a violation of th e i r oat h s, f or th , y had left the people une mndisewray; npaeypultatiinotnr.uplec,hwurhcaht pwraospenrteycewssaasryerfoigrinthaellyPirno: tended for the instruction of the people, and he asked how had the holders of it fulfilled their trust ?—(Hear.) With respect to the measure of Church reform in Ireland, it did Minister, great credit, for he believed they had gone as far as they could. (Hear, hear.) But if they wished for the prosperity of that country, they must adopt some speedy means of appropriating the tithes in Ireland—(Hear, hear) to the support of the poor, and the education of the people.—(Hear, hear.) However strong or virulent the measures of Ministers might be—although they might put down violence and tumult for the moment, it would only be for the moment, unless they educated the people, and supported the poor. He was sorry that the Noble Lord (Althorp) was not in his place, but, perhaps, some Geotleman on the Treasury Bench could answer a question, upon which several of his constituents wished to have information. They wished to ascertain what the inten tions of Government were with regard to what was termed Ministers' money. He did not know how that was re gulated in England, but in Ireland the money was col lected according to some ancient valuations, and in some parts, particularly in the city of Waterford, which he re presented, many houses were valued at ten pounds and under, which let at thirty or forty pounds a year. The collection of that money often led to acts of violence, and he thought it was a subject which well deserved the consideration of Ministers. An Host. MEMBER, in reference to the assertion that the tithes in Ireland had been transferred by Act of Par liament from the Catholics to the Protestants, said he believed there was no such Act in existence ; if there were, he should be glad to know where to find it. Certain he was that in this country there was no such an act. There were acts passed in the reign of Henry VIII., not for the transfer of tithes, but for their levy, for it ap peared that at that time there was as great difficulty in collecting tithes in this country as there was at this moment in collecting them in Ireland. Mr. HILL believed there was no such act; indeed none was necessary, for the Catholic clergy of that day became convinced of their Catholic errors, the very moment that the head of the Church —the King-- became convinced. The Catholic clergy then sud denly became Protestants, and those who had enjoyed the tithes as Catholics then received them as Pro testants. With respect to the abolition of tithes, tnany persons, himself among the rest, believed that they came in iinly from the pockets of the landlord, and that a total abolition of them would not be in favour of the poorer classes ; but would go to the land lord who would then have ten tenths the value of the land, instead of six or seven tenths, as at present.. (Hear, hear.) That might be a fallacy—it might be erroneous, but many eminent men had strong opinions upon it.—(Hear.) With respect to remunerating the clergy, he should vote for paying them in a different manner from that now adopted. The use of the Church was to teach the great doctrines of religion ; and it was most unfortunate that there was a mode of payment which put the clergyman and his parishioners in opposition to each other, and rendered the latter much less inclined than they should he to seek the excellent advice of the former. An Hole. MEMBER said, that he knew practically, as well as theoretically, that the burden of tithes fell upon the landowners, and not landholders. Mr. COBBETT—Some Hon. Gentlemen to the right and left of me have been making some assertions which I must beg leave to examine the foundations of. It has been stated that two-thirds of the property of the whole kingdom rests upon the same foundation as tithes and other church property. It must, however, be granted that the possession of much of the land in the king dom arises from grants from the Crown, or from for feitures. Now, the rights of the parties holding church property are very different. That property was conferred upon them by an Act of Henry VIII., but it was conferred upon them, subject to certain conditions, viz., that the new proprietors should for ever discharge the duties consequent upon holding that property, and satisfy the demands to which it had before been subject. Now. I say, that no part of the tithes were granted away without being subject to these commissions, as also all conventual and monastic property. The case therefore is not quite so clear as the Hon. Member near me sup poses. If he imagines that the Act of Henry was intended to be forgotten, let him look to the different Acts of Edward and Elizabeth, and he will perceive the same spirit running through them. I do not wish to anticipate the regular and full discussion we must have upon this subject, but another great error prevails upon it, with respect to which I wish to disabuse the House. Gentlemen speck as if it were the parsons in Ireland who own ail the tithes, and ate suffering by the difficulties of its collections—(Hear, hear)—but the parsons held a very knoll share of the great mass of property which the people pay under the name of tithe. It is the aristocracy which holds that property. The House, perhaps, are not aware that there are dioceses in Ireland, in which there are not more than seven Protestant clergymen, and there is, I believe, one diocese where the Bishop has only to look after five parsons.—(Hear, hear, hear.) The House is not perhaps aware that lay tithes form three-fourths of the tithes o f Ireland, and that the Bill which the Noble Lord the Chancellor of the Exchequer is to move to-night for the esta blishment of Courtsmartial in Ireland, in the the first in stance, and afterwards in England, is to compel the p op • to pay their money to the aristocracy. We he ird with gnat feeling the stage-coach stories about the sufferings of the Protestant clergy of Ireland, and I believe that many of the people of England, thinking that there is a parson in every parish, as there is in this country, began to think it too hard that the poor parsons should have the trouble of doing their duty without getting any thing for it 'Hear.) Now, the fact is, that the tithes, as said before, are for the must part in the hands m laymen. There does not appear to be more than 500 Protestant Clergymen receiving tithes in Ireland, whilst the number of Cabolic priests performing the duty is no less than 2,500.--(Cries of " No, no.") I speak from returns which ad the House will have an opportunity of ex atnining. I say again that Lords, Baronets, and Squires enjoy the ti hes, and, generally speaking, not the clergy, al though, of course, there are a few ot them who do. It i s nut correct, ttieretore, to say t ,at it is the hierAt chy ot Ireland w htch is the main cause of the oppression of that country, but th. squirearct:y.—.(H• ar.) Lord SANDON rose to set the anise right with re spect to an asttertion w'iich many Non. Members scented to think uncontroverted. He meant the supposed tourbtld appropriation of ti hes. Now, it appeare•t by the evidtnce taken before the Tithe Committee of this Honourable littuse last year, that no such general ecclesiasttcal division of the tithes existed, and that there was only ontt pari.li which could be adduced as a proof of the existence ot the practice at all. He perfectly agreed with 'he Hon. Member for Oldham that it was the squirearch) and not the hierarchy enjuyed the greater part of the tithes in Ireland. In older, perhaps, to give Gen tlemen some clue to the cause of the wierchedness of that country more correcty than that of the oppression of the Protestant clergy, he would mention a fact whicif was proved before a Committee, of which he was a member. A gentleman who was examined, toad them that on his coming of age he had found his estate overburdened with population, and determined to clear it. This was a very simple phrase, but what did the gentleman mean by it ? Why, he turned forth one thousand one hundred p-ople without a home into the highways to starve and shift for thernselves.—(fear, hear.) He stated that he gave them nothing, and when asked what hal become of them, be said that some had gone into the town, others had gone on to neighbourin g estates, and others again had become thieves anti vagaboads.—(Hear, hear.) No landlord it. England could act in this way for shame, if nothing else would prevent him,—(llear, hear.) lie did not mean to aft) , that the gentlemen of Ireland were deficient is JUNE, ..,..._. : Newton 5: Buxton l:2 Newcastle-upon-Tyne l7 EDINBURGH COURT OF SESSION.--COUNT PrA IT DE PFAFFEN lIOFFEN v. CIIA It LES X.—The evidence and pleading in this case have been cor,clu•ted, and the Lord Ordinary has pronounced the following interlocutor :—" The Lord Ordinary, having heard the Counsel for the parties on the closed record and whole process, appoints them to prepare mutual cases, arguing the whole cause, to be given in on the first box-day in the ensuing vacation; to be seen and interchanged, adjusted and re-lodged by the second box.thy ; and then to he transmitted by the Clerk to the Lord Ordinary to be advised." COLBURN'S MODERN NOVELISTS.---Tile Second Monthly Set of this new Library of Modern Fic tion (for March) will consist of Mr. BULWER'S celebrated novel of " Pelham." This collection will comprise the most sterling and admired works by the most distinguidied authors of the last twenty years; and as the copyritita are the exclusive property of Mr. COEBURN, they cannot appear, as erroneously reported, in any other collection whatsoever. They are issued forth at about one-third of the original price, and are, in fact, cheaper than the Waverley Novels, being handsomely printed in post Svo,, and bound in morocco cloth, at only 4'. per volume. AMERICAN NAVAL ETIQUETTE.—AII boas that approach th e s hi p at n i g h t , are h ailed b y one o f the gangway s e nt r ie s —" B oat , a h oy !" t h e answer i n di. cates the rank, and the reception is regulated accordingly. A Commodore replies, " Fleet !" a Captain repeats the name of his ship; a Lieutenant answers, " Ay ! ay !" all Officers of an inferior grade, " No, no," anti a ',e a .. man, " Halloo !" The sentry reports the answer to the quartermaster, and he to the officer of the (leek, who is bound to see that the officer is properly received, according to his rank. Captain W. once came off to the ship at night, in a shore-boat. lie replied, " No, no," to the challenge of the sentry, and was received by a , nidshipman. Ludicrous mistakes sometimes occur. have heard a drunken sailor answer, Ay !ay !" and when all the " pomp and circumstance," wiqa which a Lieutenant is received bad been prepared, who should appear but a tottering devotee of Bacchus, his clothes half tern from his back, and he bluVeting out his words thr,ugh tips thick as the bulwarks to which tie clung for support.— Two Years and a holfin the American .IVaezi. RESTORING WALLS TO THEIR PERPEN DICtiLARITV.—The weight of the roof of the large gal. iery of the Conservatoire des Arts et Meters pressed the sides outwards so as to endanger the building; acd it was requisite to find means by which the wall should be through the w building from, w a ll o u wee been propped so as to sustain the roof. M . MoLAatt contrived. the following ingenious plan f or t h e purpose atlls, : a — nd A st ,' e ei re ie' se (4 .. d t r oti a g b ars ng re carriedtioles acrossathen the out s id e . I n this state they would leave s s suf f icient to h ave prevented the farther sepia; a ets byi icon p Ia . ti t i s o „ion of the walls by the weight of the roof, but it was desirable to restore the walls to their original state by diawing them together. This was effected in the follow. .ng manner :...Alternate bars were heated by lamps fixed beneath them. They expanded; and conequent!s., the nuts, which were previously in contact with lie walls were no longer so. These nuts were then screwed up so as to be again in close contact with the waifs.- The lamps were equal to that. against the. withdrawn, and the ba rs now a ll owe d to c t o h o e l L, cooling, they gradually con t rac t e d , an d resumed i.r former di. w in d e i o: , ion d s re ; w co o n i the e se m qu t e o n g t e l t y h , ert h ro n u u g ts l: a p 8 r p es a s e i g through which they had been screwed up. Meanwhile, the intermediate bars w e re heated and expanded, atiJ th e nuts screwed up as before. The /amps bang ag a i n w i t h. drawn, they contracted in cooling, and the wa ll a were further drawn together. This process w as cont i nualv , repeated, until, at length, the walls w ere restored to their perpendicular position. The ga ll ery may still be seenwith the bars extending across it, a n d bl us hi ng together its walk ...Cabinet cyclopadia. SEPTEMBER, Warwick ... Dorchester Lichfield Doncaster Newmarket Ist October '1(1 OCTOBER. Newmarket 1d tic tuber l4 Newmarket Houghton