The Sun. — London, England, 1830-11-12 00:00:00

I</Z e I .~ • • //". ' tt: ' i • ..r : Pf . 4 Int . , .... 0 ~ '/,„ , ' .... (. ,!.• -,. - 1 „,,,,: . i . ...4 3 , 1t ,,,,_ ~.: til e, „...... K.,.... ' . ' - . 4 1 -v , riii ", Ili 4 e ~ IV. lior i xt , ilt • r e, ' .. 1 ( if.,....,...... „, ---- ~....... ‘,.... ,''...-'----,_.,/,, 1 _, i CQNTRACTS FOR WHE AT, &c. VICTUALLING OFFICE, Nov. 11, 1830. HE Commissioners for Victualling His -! 1 1. Majesty"' Navy, &c. do hereby give notice, that on rains+, the 111th instant, they will be ready to receive Tender, in writing (healed up), and treat for the suppiy of the following Articles, to he delivered into his Majesty's Vic tualling Stores, at Deptford, before the 24th day of De , wither next, viz,:— Artistes. Quantity. WHEAT, RED 1,500 Quarters. WHEAT, WHITE 5OO hing not lees than 60Th. to the Bushel.) IiALT I'ALF AMBER llO PEASti 1,000 OATMEAL 6O Toss. i:Ot:OA 3O RAISINS CANVAS 2,000 gaMPI. I I of the Wheat, Malt, Pear*, Oatmeal, Cocoa, and Cut' Inuit be pr o d uce d by th e p ar ty ten d er i n g ; that gur Comas, together with the Couditioiss of 116 Contracts, tally be seta at this Oilice. Each Tender roast specify the price in words at length, and be delivered before (.)tie &sleek ou the day appointed, mad the Person who makes the Tender, or some Person on his behalf, must attend to answer when called for. 5 ~`„"'- M. WALLER. CLIFTON. DISMISSAL OF MINISTERS. A T MEETING of the COUNCIL of the POLITICAL UNION of the Town of BIR MINGHAM, held at the Globs Tavern, m Tetnple.atreet, this 9th day of November, 1530, THOMAS ATTWOOD, Esq., in the Chair : A Copy of his Maj ,, sty's Speech to both Mimes of Ba ilment, together with a report of the Duke of Wellington's declaration against Parliamentary Reform, having been read to this Council, was resolved Unanimously— , 30, ......that a bumble Petition be presented to his Ma mays praying that he will be pleased to dismiss his tem from his Conneits and presence for ever. 2d.--That the following Petition, now read, be adopted; and that the Chtinnsn be requested to take the necessary measures for obtaining the signatures] of the inhabitants of • . Birmingham, and fur having it safely delivered into his Alajesty's own hands. ad.—That this Council earnestly request and enjoin their fellow=countrynaen, throughout the United kingdom, to co me 14 ward without delay, and co.opoiate with the inhabitant s of Birmingham in petitioning his Majesty to distnise his present Ministers from his Council, and pre sence for ever. TrioNtAs ATTWOOD, Clia;rntan. • By:order of the Political Council, • BENJ. HADLEY, Secretary. Cop 'Y OF THE PETITIO:•1 A BOVE REFERRED TO. TO TUE NINO'S MOST Exci:Li.rwr NIAJeS"CY. ~I RlV "'"Vtr e , th e und ers i gne d, your M a j e sty's dutiful ;mg loyal subjects, inhahitants of the town of Birming ham, beg.leave humbly to represent to your Majesty, the grief and alarm with which we have perused the Speech, rliti, delivered by your M a j esty, on t h e open i ng o f Par tniot• We are convinced that the turn who have re commended that Speech to your Majestyare no real friends to your Majesty's throne, nor to the liberty or happiness of your Majesty's faithful and loyal people. To ley nothing of the foreign topics which are alluded to, and which are treated in a way which must give pain to the great mass of your Majesty's subjects, we would Tifiste our observations to the expiessions which your Majesty has been advised to make use of, respecting the• Present situation of the inhabitants of these realms. We almost distrusted our senses, when we saw that your Ma imLY, instead of followi nf the dictates of your own bene. :" D I 1111 " heart, and expressing condolence and sympathrwith measured wrongs and sufferings of eke industrious e " u *lis, had been advi se d t o co ng ra t u late the Parliament, „ "PQ, the (cmimercial prosperity," and " social—hop. P. 5 10 ,51 of the country. It is onr painful duty to inform your Majesty, that but lit tle Commercial Prosperity" exists iu England, and that but little prosperity of any kind exists in England, excepting that which is unhappily found among the men - 4 . 11 '° derive unjust advantage' out of the plunder, degrade lion a .7 ' 111 ‘. opp ression, of the great masa of the People. - . And the mime remark holds good respecting " Socia/ . Ar lorpasen." There is but little " social happiness" ; I : 484 i i,Pe"Ples broken down by dire 'pointed hopes and ~...._,„- „ n rw a ; ,'"ed labours, barrassed with diminishing means ` - ir . .Y` . `" ioereassiog burthens, and etasperated spinet to. cet illtelafaisist each other, by the injuries and difficul ties to Whafftethe operation of partial and unjust laws ee. Poles them. i• 0 manufacturer and the farmer, deprived 1" . their just a n d ightiid-Prolits, eisdesivour to *cite the,. tk t Wages of their orkinen in their defence ; the unhappy workmen, redticed in their employment and their wages, and oPpeeserei by saxes, rents, corn laws, and charges of many binde,'entlea4sur to find a 'maintenance out of the withal of theirlempl4,er when his profits fail. A scene of discord and misery is thus produced, which is general throughout the tone - ry, and which we humbly presume does not justify the mof "social happiness" which your hlsjesty's hlinisteis ply to it. Sire For ma y 'ears past the commercial classes of Your M a jesty's sub ts have submitted to unheardsof diffi culties and priva is with exemplary patience, loyalty, fortitude, and for ranee; and we cannot but regret to P er ceive tliet s th , xe cise of three great virtues should nerd over ! Ministers , ! ked by ycur Majesty's • either be °' made s \ Ara ,e of b the as giving evidence of "social "I'Pine S' s and " onsmercial prosperity." I t would I 'ei , m that your Majesty ' s Ministers , overloaded with riches . and luxuries themselvei, will not believe in the existence of distress, or of jurtitiable discontent among the people, until the minds of your f a ithful stud loyal subjects are P"deil and exasperated by a long course of insult, injury, 'oil initenansgement • sled the national spirit rises up in „,d - its ~ , news to sweep the incaut•ion. of the country be fore it. 41/ good and loyal subjects of your Majesty, we feel it "be duty to declare that in our humble opinion , there is, nu iet.litittion pith e country which can be safe under the ~ -°unc ile of men like these, We are perfectly convinced that no solid prosperity can exist in England, so lung as 111. ... 1r viiiis and measures are persisted in. zeor Majesty's faithful and loyal people are suffering u nder wrongs and injuries of many kinds; and they rea -1 thill lee y claim as a remedy the restoration of their ancient and undoubted right to a full and fair representation in bless own House of Parliament. Your Majesty's Mini 6,t,ecite declar e th at the people are prosperous and happy— !, tNo reform of the representation is necessary, and 1 ... .a0t none shall be granted / It is known and idiom "tilled dist a majority of the House of Commons are not returned to Parliament by the people, but by leas than f OO individ ua l s w h o have usurped the i r r i g h ts an d p e lvis il d !". mid yet your Majesty's Ministers have the temerity tov : 4 44e iu P ar li ament t h at t hi s state o f th e representa• 1 ... " 8 right, an d th a t i t s h a ll not b e a lt ere d I .., W e have no wor d s to express to your M a j es ty the alto- Ho:intent and a l arm w hi c h these d ec l arat i ons o f yo u r Ma; .1!! y's Ministers have scattered throughout the country.-- y m ,,iir til ‘ e i very moment when the happy commencement of . _ ridge the hope t to it reign had led your faithful and loyal people go a clone arid t their ' hat their long sufferings were drawing t „ be .. i het rights and li b erties were about • 4 ,,, i th s"t"vtAs the cup of hope is dashed from their lips, . • totebi n " Li o sr as e I .7 d fi l e e s o p l a Y i • r p . lunged into the dark and reckless sta ' ‘ B . _ j r_er`eli is f ur your his eat to determine whether this ~,1 7 ,° 1 thin gs sh e ll continue. The Ministers and the Pe ere p . lseed in opposition to each other ; this Consti tenon has .. given power "to your Majesty to protect your now; a n d , , of thst ~ "'al people; we dutifully claim the exeicise yo ur i t .r -w ee at your Majesty's hands ; and we imp'ore l ijesty to be geaeiously yleased' to dismiss from your ' - • pr, Pruned* and preseric.l for ever the Ministers whO have so ~, 'linseed your Royal confidence, and to cheose such Ch i' aisle end upright Ministers as mat, be willing and • -. 11..; Went to restore the lost rights and happiness of. time 1 !units and to establish your Majesty's throne in the hearts 1 td ' f rees grateful and loyal people. 1 i prosperous, CHILBLAINS, RHEUMATISM, SPRAINS, Sm. BUTLER'S CAJEPUT OPODELDOC. CAJEPUT OIL, which is the basis of this t i n .„ ‘ °l 4 4clilue, hasbeen long esteemed on the Om -49 a reined y fur Chronic Itheuntatistn, Spasmodic "m 'ot, Chtlidsins, Pal s y, Sti ff ness, and Enlargement tff the Joints, Sprains, Bruises, and Deafness'; Combined 111 ette for m of Opotieldue, it is rendered none penetrating, ollisoquently more efficacious as a n externals pplies -11)41 Rubbed u n the skin, by means of flannel, or the *urn b arttl , it Allays morbid irtitation of nerves, juvi brines the absorbents, and accelerates the circulation. Sold in bottles, at Is 111 l 9 I lot Messrs. Butler, •. • ~ am Chetuiats Cheapside, corner of St. Psui v or , and • ( e ) :1,;" 1 86, New Bond- s t ree t, an d 2 20, Regent-street , ""2, 26, Oxford.street ; Bayley atui Co,. rip CUCk' 1 1 4 1 " 1 " 41 ; Witulus, 431, Bialtopgate Without ; Chalk , • klinories ; Easum, 27, Ahlgate; °ming, / 50 . " 4 1111; Awl at Lurk 237 1 Tot' Yet*'* agues,* tanha• t.,ouot-rristi. 1 . 1 ,: 1 1 whom uhry be bad MARSHALL'S UNIVERSAL L ATE, an excell en t reme d y f or Olen tol,n, Scalds, Burns, •,* Ask fur Butler's Cajeput Opodeldoc. No. 11,909. FIRE I - -FIVE HUNDRED POUNDS REWARD. WFIEREAS on the night of TUESDAY , the 9th of November, about Ten o'clock, the WHEAT BARN of Mes-ra. SHER HORN, at &aunt, Middlesex, wart wilfully set on Fire, and the same, with the. Stock therein, consumed; TWO HUNDRED POUNDS Rewind will be paid by the COUNTY FIRE OFFICE, where the above property was Insured, for Discovery of. the Miscreant or Miscreants, concerned in this Outrage, so that they may be brought to Conviction, in additioit to TWO HUNDRED POUNDS of by Messrs. SHERBORN, and ONE HUNDRED POUNDS offered by the Gentlemen of the Niighbourbood. Any Accomplice giving Evidence that may lead to Conviction, riLty receive the oboe° Reward, and his Mu je.ty's Pardon will be applied for in his favour. Similar Rewards will he paid for information, if any similar acts of atrocity be repeated in the County of Mid dlesex within Six Months. J. A. BEAUMONT, Secretary, County Fire Office. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. MOUSE OF LORDS, nitIRSDAY, Nov. I i. The Loan CHANCELLOR took his seat on the Wool sack it Five 'o'elock.: • REGENCY BILL. The LORD CIIANCELLOR postponed his mains for leave todsriiir•in • the Regency Bill from Friday to Mon day nett. HIS *IAJESTY'S VISIT 'TO THE ,CITY. The Earl OPRADNOR said Aliat he would take this op. portunity of putting a question or twolo the Noble Duke at the head of the Government, relative to the letter writ ten by the Secretary of State to the Lord Mayor. It would be in the reco:le,•tion of their Lordships that at the time the Noble Duke gave his explanation of the course pursued by his Majesty's Ministers relative to his Majesty's not dining with ',the Lord Mayor, he stated that he bad other grounds than the letter written by the Lord Mayor for advising the King to adopt the course he had done. The Noble Duke had then stated that be had received anonymous letters from various persons on the subject, but that the main ground of their advice had proceeded on the letter received from the Lord Mayor, in which his Lordship had stated that great con fusion and bloodshed might ensue. Now he (Lord Radnor) on the further reading of that letter had observed that the Lord Mayor, in reference to the confusion anticipated, had stated that it was likely to occur nut within the city but out of it. He (Lord Radnor) thought it incumbent on his Majesty's Ministers, before they advised his Ma jesty to a course au calamitous, to inquire well into the foundations 'of the ground on which they proceeded. What he wished to know in the first place was, whether When the letter was written by the Secretary of Stets for the Home Department to the Lord Mayor Elect, his Majesty'. Ministers had not so little con fidence in the reports that were abroad, and the letter written by the Lord Mayor, as to direct the per son who took the letter to his Lordship to inquire whether the whole was not a hoax. Ile also wialled to know whether the Noble Duke would at any, and at what time, state to the House the other information to which he had alluded, and on which lie bad acted. lie (Lord R.) also wished to be informed, not so much for his own satisfaction as for that of his Majesty's loyal people, whether the letter sent by the Seeretary of State to the Lord Mayor, had not been sent without the knowledge of his Majesty, there being at the present moment reports currently in circulation that it bad.--(Hear, hear.) The Duke of WELLINGTON fait sorry that the Noble Lord should still 'persevere in calling the non-visit of his Majesty to the city a calamitous measure. He firmly be lieved that he did so contrary to the majority of both this and the other House of Parliament, and most certainly generally contrary to the impressions of the inhabitants of the inetopolis. Tile Noble Lord had Wen pleased to catechize him thrice ; l,e wished to know first, wheilier or nut theeletter, written to the Lout Mapir, had been laid before his Majesty, and his pleasure taken upon it. Ile would at once answer the Noble Lord that it had, and that be siwuld have considered himself as having grossly forgotten his duty, had he attempted to sanction the writing of such a letter without his Majesty's ap p roval. Another question propounded by the Noble Lord was, 'whether the letter written by the Lord Mayor, was, or was not, the only ground, or what share • it had, in inducing his Majesty's Ministers to adopt the course they had done. Now the HORS* would recollect that he had • stated the other day that be had received many anonymous letters, in many of which names were given in and others not, stating what woul I probably. result from his Majesty's visit to the City. To these, however, he had not paid any particalar attention, till he received she letter from the Lord Mayor Elect on Saturday in the afternoon, when be immediately conferred with his Majesty's Secretary of State on the subject. Further information was received on the following day, and under these circumstances his Majesty's Ministers had thought fit to adopt the course against which the Noble Lord declaimed. The Noble Lord wished him to lay this information before the House. This he declined doing..—(Bear.) The Howe had not passed any vote of censure on Ministers on the conduct they had pursued, and he therefore thought it unnecessary to lay. any further information before the House. With reference to that part of the Noble Lord'. question on the authenticity of the Lord Mayor'. letter, he must say that it was thought important to know the truth, whether that letter had been written or not, by the Lord Mayor, and in consequence of that the person carrying the letter was directed to inquire whether it was authentic or not and on the inquiry, his Lordship stated that it was. The Lord Mayor in that letter had stated the necessity of hav ing military in the city, in order to preserve peace. --(Hear.) Such being the ease, l's preservation might have caused bloodshed. If the Noble Lord doubted this, he, would refer him to what took place in the city on Tor day night, during the whole of which it was a scene of uproar. Ministers recommended his Majesty to abstain from the treat, because they knew well if the military were necessary to keep order the shedding of blood might ensue. He thought that his Majesty's Ministers would have ill discharged their duty, had they not recommended his Majesty to adopt the course they had. For himself be felt proud,and gloried in what he had done. Lord KING said he did nut know who was right or who was wrong on this occasion, but it was evident that the Nellie Duke was determined to say, . 4 I know no more than my Lord Mayor." The Noble Duke complained that a Noble Lord h,.d used the word calamity," but perhaps he would be satisfied with the substitution of the word fo ly," as in his opinion more foolish advice was never given by Ministers to a Sovereign.--(Hear.) The Cabinet Council appeared to him to know much less than the Com mon Council ; and the Court of Alderman had more sense and discretion than that Court where Ministers metaled to advise the Crown. The Earl of CLANRICABDE said that it was evident that Government were in possession of soother information than that afforded by the Lord Mayor, fur if they were they would have acted on it, and not have waited for recommu nication which was in itself doubtful, The Noble Duke had said that bloodshed might have taken place in securing his Majesty's return to his Palace, but he was convinced that his Majesty's popularity would have secured the town from any such results. It was a'so said that the dislike to the new police would have been the source of disorder, but he.was persuaded that it was not sufficient to excite the people. There were no police when the Lord High Ad miral went to dine in the City, and he was convieeed that his Majesty was as popular at this moment as he was when he hglil that office. Lord WHARNCLIFFE denied that the popularity of the King was called into question by any thing which had transpired on the former or the present evening.-- (Hear. )--His Majesty's Government had an alternative, and, in his opinion, they had exercised it sound judgment in the choice they made. There was, on the other hand, the danger of giving a momentary alarm, and, on the other, if there had been a riot, the King and would have witnessed a tutnult.—(Hear.)—This Consort beir Lord ships would see that such a risk was not to be encountered. of riot and tumult; but he bed b N e trb n ie p L res o e n n is t s o i n 'ea m k o l r i e ghy than tl one of such occasions, and it was a source of pain to see the force that was necessary to be called in to subdue them. Every other means should he employed to avoid arrivlng st th at extremity, but, when once the necessity came, nothing but energy and decision would answer. SLAVERY. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE, in presenting several petions against negro slavery, said be was as friendl y to LOPON, FRIDAY EVENDW, NOVEMBER 12, 1830. the abolition of slavery as ever ; but, u some of thrOe pets, 'ions called for the instantaneous abolition, he was anxious t o preserve himself from the appearance of acquiescing in any such 114811 or improvident experiment. - COAL TRADE. The 'Marquis of LONDONDERRY, in presenting two petitions from the proprietors of coal mines on the Tyne and from the county of • Durham, praying the alealition of all duties, begged to call their Lordships' attention to that important sub ject. Thri, he confessed, was a most unfor tunate period fur such en application, as he was aware that Government requited an inerrased revenue for the increas ing expenses of the country ; but he still thought that something might be done in the way of relief to the parties, without embarrassing the finances of the State. The peti tion asked that the duty cm all coats consumed in the country should be repe led. He suggested that, if the export duty were taken off, a large trade with Holland— now that that country ceased to take bee supply of fuel from Belgium—might be opened ; and be considered that the shipping would be considerably benefited if the general duties. were diminished. He thought it bath that, while the proprietors of rail-roads were free from taxation, tle., moment the coals left that mode of carriage for shipboard a duty should commence. This was a grievance which the 'hipping interest might fairly complain of, and he hoped their Lordships would give the subject their best attention. Lord TEYNHAM supported the petition. Lord TEYNHAM presented a petition from Lieutenant- General Thorntun, of Park-lane, praying that time deck* a tion against transubstantiation should be abolished.' Lord WHARNCLIFFE presented a petition from the Wesleyan Methodists of Sheffield, in favourJ4 the abolition of slavery. He'said this was one of 266 petititions whieb he had to offer on the same subject. , its coming, and then sought for a remedy. With respect to the real grievance, he concurred entirely with the Noble Earl who had brought forward this motion in his opinion of the abuse of the poor laws. He thought. in common with the Noble Earl, that it was in conse quence of their abuse that the present misery, es irate, and destitution of property, were so apparent seal averts helm ing. . He was aware that he was using strong words— (Meer, hear)—but hewn prepared to prove, by undeniabl e evidence, that the danger which awaited any further neglect was of a most , tremendous description, .and it be came the House to institute immediate measures for the full employment of the labouring poor of the country. The poor laws, it was universally admitted, were inade quate to supply sufficient relief whilst there was such 4 large proportion of superabundant labour in the market. The mode for affording relief which he would Rugged was simple, and easy of adoption, either to a partial extent, or eu a very large scale. There were in this country mil lions of acre* of uncultivated lands, and in our foreign possessions there was a, still more enormous proportion of suds lands. The immediate sum collected fur the poor in this country amounted, annually, to seven millions, a fraction of which employed in the mode which he sug gested would afford instant occupation, and consequent relief, by profitably engaging the poor in the cultivation of the waste laud.. The principle of she Colonial scheme which he new suggested, was admitted by Government no less than ten years ago, fur he recollected being associated with a certain number of individuals in an undertaking fur the purpose of investing a sum of money in the cultivation of certain lands in Southern Africa. By the charter of the Company, 300,000/. were empowered to be subscribed, in order to carry their objects into effect; and the undertaking was encouraged by a Noble Earl, whom lie bad in his eye (Bathurst), whose unction was followed by that of the Government to a certain extent ; but it was ultimately considered by the. Government to be too consi derable an undertaking for a private Company, and the Ministry signified their intention of taking it into their own bands, which was ultimately done. The proposition , be would offer was the appropriation of 50,000/. in the cultivation of waits lands, which would not be too large a suns to bawd in such an undertaking, as, even if it did not animer expectation,. it would be compsratively a trifling Fide. He merely stated this its miler to bring the sulject again before the notice of Government, as it had previously occupied their attention, and had subsequently been spoken and written upon by individuals of the highest repu tation fur wisdom. He would suggest that the expe riment be commenced on some of the waste lands at home, and, in recommendation of his argument, there was the broad fact, that every shilling produced by this means WAS so much taken front the mime:hies , - mot amount of the poor-rates. The present admini stration of the poor laws, under the Act of the 53i1 Geo, 111., was such As to render labour an absolute puoish ment upon the poor who applied for relief. The mode pursued under that Act, of giving piece-work to the paupers to do, as a punishment, was not the right way to encourage a spirit of industry. The plan suggested by recent writers on the subject of pauperism—that of at taching half an acre of ground to each cottage, in order that it might afford some assistance to the inhabitant, lied long been in practica in that part of the county of Suffolk in which he resided : the effects wine most beneficial, and the success of the plan could not be doubted ;—as an in stanee, he would cite un example which existed in a parish in his own neighbourhood, where thirty-six years ago, the assessment fur poor-rates did not exceed es. 3d. per acre—and even at the prevent time it dial not exceed 2s. 7d. showing an increase of 11. on the acre during a period of 36 years. What was the reason of this? Simply that all the labourers' cottages in that pariah had, 36 y ea r s ago , a plot of ground attached to Ahem, and tl ose plaits of ground were Lull cultivated shy the tenants of those cot tages. The consequence wta,,that every body debited to belong to that parials-Nuthiititte sad result of the present system of poor laws was especially observable in a constant recourse to perjury in order to attain that end. The poor ' dews might, be said to hold out .a premium upon perjury, by rendering it so easy fur any poison to obtain a oettle meat upon thou terms in any particular parish. He con sidered that, if he was enabled by any exertions of his to ameliorate the condition of the poor, or lighten the pres sure of the poor-rates, his time would be spent in a manner the most satisfactory to himself. The Marquis of SALISBURY differed with both the Noble Lords who had preceded him on the present apses lion, lie was inclined to attribute the defective state of the poor laws rather to the basis upon which they were founded, than to their mal-administration. Whilst he was yet a young man he had assisted, unworthily, in the other House, on the Committee which framed the Act of b 3 George 111.. and he was inclined to maintain the same opinions which he then held. Ile did not consider the evil to exist in over-population, and would enter his pro test against any measure forsthe traniportation of the poor to other countries, under any plan whatever. Ile hoped that, on some future occasion, .the House would see the necessity for going into the inquiry, whets there was some likelihood of its being attended wills good ; but be thought in the existing state of the country, it was cede tea the Bill about to be intr o duc e d by m ' the .tih7 N a"t o i b ri l ir e ene E t orin accede Lord SUFFIELD explained. Lord TEYNHAM begged their Lordshipe pardon for intruding on their time ; but considered it to be a duty which he owed to the House to state his tentimeets on the motion of the Noble Lord. lie had studied the poor-laws from a very early period, and undersea) I them as well as any man - living—(A laugh). He coneidered that the law of Elizabeth, which gave the Magistrate the power of fixing the rate of labourers' wages to be a most, beneficial one. In the reign of Chitties the Secoud there was an Act which rendered it, imperative on those who received relief from the parish to reside in the workhouse; but if that Act were in existence now, there would not be land enough in the whole kingdom to bui4l the workhouses for the reception of the pour upon.— (A laugh.)—He denied the demoralization of the Kentish labourers. Ha considered the distre.sed state of the la bouring population in the county in wl.i. It he resided to arise from two causes--the duty upon hops, and that also upon mah. Those two combined had driven the peasant front his comforts ; he was no longer able to brew, told he' consequently ce,sed to bake. There was a time, in his revolleetien, when every tuan baked his own bread, and when, in consequence, there was no such thing as a public baker. Now every villager got his bread either front the baker of his hamlet, or from the neighbouring town ; the wife had ee teed to be notable in consequence of this alters. Lion in her house. He had in his peeket a letter, signed by a gentleman iu Kent, stating that the farmers in that anti the adjoinieg county of Sussex, bad been intimidated into raising the wages of their labourers to lbs. per week. lie did not consider the Mill about to be introduced by the Noble Lord as likely to lead to any good. It was for the Government to come forward in aid of the poor laws, and lay a tax upon that property which paid no part to wants the maintenance of the pour-.-he meant the funded property. 'rids would enable the overseers of each parish to set to work and effect a permanent modification of the present arrangement. He expressed his satisfaction to perceive the spirit with which the House was taking the suLject into their eoneideretion, and anticipated that relief which would certainly be afforded to the country from their Lni &hips' deliberations. The Duke of lIICIIAIOND said it had not been his intention to trouble the House with any cliseivations upon the Hill Which the Noble Earl had introduced, but after the statement which:had just hero made by the Noble Lord opposite._.a statement which he would venture to say was not authentic, and which could not be proved, he could not suffer his silence to be construed into an Acknowledg ment of the truth of that averment. The Noble Lord had alluded to the state of the farmers in Kent and Sussex, and had said that they had raised the wages of their labour ers to Ifis. a week, out hem feeling soy wish to alleviate their distress, but from a motive which, as far as regarded Sussex, he would declare never had existed there—a reel avi:xgryohfaperiibilbcl;tti;;;;fli: ii i i s ly t t e l : 4 l o : l o yra o tt f une tli i i p s i,,i)i f i k iti e lie l v, i ne n t g ; no hesitation denying ; the farmers of Kent and Sul' d lubourers.---he hoped that they had done so ; but ")h e i l et i t i lv u n:g l i i ; l l. such prove to he the case, he thought they were entitled te receive credit fur better motives than these atttibuted to them by the Noble Lord. • lie rose, therefore, to give this statement of the Noble Lord,the strongest eolittA4ivti°n that Parliamentary l anguage would ailinit of, lie woe let rota now discuss the merit* of the fill, as it WWI not yet read, and, consetptently, could not judged of according to its merits, hut I e would notice *mother assertion of the Noble Lord opposite, who seemed to wish lb" the Poor Laws should be inquired into, not by a Coin. mittee of the House, but by a Commission of Government. A plan like this could not, in his (pinion, be prodeto.' live of any good, for the Commission would never do its duty; nor did he think the House had the right to dele gate such a power to any Ministry. A Committee might he appointed, which could sit up stairs and examine wit., nesse', and come to some final determination on the sub-:. ject. The Members of Government knew little or nothing about the poor laws, as they were necessitated to reside in London ; and few, if any, were possessed of much landed property. He questioned if the Noble Lord opposite (Bathurst) knew much about those laws, but he hoped, by meals of a Committee on the subject, to make Go vernment so well acquainte&with them as to induce thew to take them up with a serious intention of remedying; their defect,. He could nut agree with the proposition that taxation had nothing to do with the poor laws; the duty on hops ought to remain as it iv, heoause it encou raged competition ; but the malt tax he should belled to see repealed. He considered relief might be afforded country by raising taut* on other subjects. Lord TEYNHAM explained tbat the letter on which his statement respecting the cause for raising the rate of . labourers wages in Kent and Sussex, was written by a person who was of great respectability, and he had given the letter to the Noble Duke who sat near him (Welling ion), who might read it to their Lordships if they wished it. He trusted, therefore, if this statement was found be correct, that the Noble:Deice would see that he hod ap. plied the terms of conteaidkaioo usjuetly towalds hlOn Lord STOURTON.considered that the pismire of thei poor-rates varied in different counties, and that in . some counties it was not so oppressive as in others. Ile would , instance his own as a case in point, where the condition of the people was as good now as it was thiity years ago. Ile would venture to assert that their receipts might be put on one aide of the account, And the mice of provisions on the other, and it would be (mind that at no time was their condition better or more easy than at present—even under . the pressure of what he might justly term 4 cycle of bad year+. He stated this to show that the distress did not erire entirely out of the poor laws—which were beneficial—but it was from their abuse that the evil arose ; this abuse was, bow Over, only symptomatic of the disease, which was the surplus of labour—not, he would say, in this country, but, in lieland ; and as - long as this surplus exists their Lent. ships must lay their account with hearing the complain's of distress. The Irish must either be employed, or they will continue to degrade the English labourer to their own level ; and, let the enactments of Parliament be what they will, they will be broken through, ae it will ever he impossible to rodeo them to the other side of the Channel, and to the starvation that awaits them there, He load heard much of the fe'. ciprocity between the two countries, but it would he found impossible, with a bridge, es it might be called, of steam, to have two rates of labour in ' the two countries; it would he found impossible to invite over the licit and detain the poor there, or to di ive them back, Ile did not pretend to dictate any measures for adoption, but he would appeal to Government--fir it was not to be done by an individual—to direct' some of their attention towards the amelioration of 'rebind. It was said that the uncultivated lends there were irreclaimable, bet he would assert that they were not only reclaimable, but he would go farther, and recommend Government to locate people on those lands. lie knew there were men who take lands of this description to a very considerable extent, and who let email parcels of them, round the boar" of the bog., to people who would rather live there than nut in Ira *I A, He legged to apologise for taking up the time of the House—(Hear, hear)-I,ot them was one thing lie wished to state, and he woe actuated by no improper feel-' ing—eucb, indeed, was farthest from his mind,but be could not but remark that, since the Relief Bill of 1829, which, htviag risen for the MO time in that House, he expressed his thanks and gratitude to the Noble Duke for—(llrar,) —the good expected to be attained lye •that measure had been suspended in a great degree by the agitation which was, he grieved to see, still existing in Ireland, sod which prevented its salutary effect in that country ; but as the Union with Scotland had ultimately brought great benefit upon that country, which it failed at first to do,; owing to the , existing political dissensions, so be eoniii. tiered that the benefits which would ultimately result to Ireland from the Union were delayed in contequence of similar political dissensions, which have tended to de prive her of the benefit which she would have derived from the outlay of the surplus capital existing in this country. He would suggest, as a cure for the evil, which afflicted that country, end which might be compared to a typhus fever, the same remedies which were applied 'in that disorder--namely, plenty 'of food and plenty of `int ployment.—(llear.) Lord CARBERY said that, after an experience of 81) years of the results of the Union, he believed that the volution of the connection between the two countries must I be the consequence of the repeal of that Union, which he believed to be the sa`ratiun of both. What they wanted in Leland, was the 'employraent of English capital, and that could only be obtained by the continuance of trans quillity. This, however, was not to I e effected by keep g up that al) minable system of agitation which same men kept up, with other objects in view than the peace of the :country. Mom the moment of the passing of the Catholic Relief Bill, the attention of English capitalists was diteetd towards Ireland, and propositions were en. terml into for the purpose of embarking large sums In that country. Since the propolition for the repeal of the Union had beat agitated, however, to his own knowledge, many of those propositions were suspended, and that ca pital, which would flow in wide arming through Ireland, would now be checked, or directed into other channel*. Lord GORT said that, when first the Unite" of the two countries was proposed in the Irish House of Comment, he opposed it in ev, ry stage, andlie hoped, therefore, that his opinion would now have venue weight with his country men. He did not know, if the question were to lie again discussed under the same circumstances es before, whether he should pursue the saute course ; but the question now was, whether the Union was advantageous to Ireland ? He was of opinion that it was adVantageous, and that its repeal would be the deetruction of that country. They bad an example, in the cams of Clete, Tipperary, and Waterfiwd, of the description of Governmeot they would have if such an occurrence took•place. If the Union were to be dissolved, there would he a dioodution of the comm. don between the two countries. When the Speaker was about to put the question in the Irish Iltmae of Comm o ns, it was awed by some eminent toen of that day thst 'it would be advisable to resist the measure by time. Ile had then the honour to command a regiment, and, though op. posed to the measure, yet, when it was agreed to by a ma jority of the House of Conine's, he felt that it would be Ida duty to have enforced its operation as checrlutly 411 if it had been a measure in accordance with hie OWP feelings. No one could therefore accuse him of ineonslateney in now. opposing the repeal of the Vision, which experience proved to have been beneficial to both countries. The Bail of WINCHELSEA mid that his object wsa that the operation of the 11111 should be contiped to those places (Aloe the labouring clams were - thrown upon the poor-rates for support, lle tepalled the insinuation did the rise of wages in gent was owing to intimidetion--he rejected with acorn and contempt the imputation upon--the landed proprietors, as well 49 upon the great body of the people of the county.—( Hear.) Lord STOURTON explained that in the observation• he made, be meant no reflection on die Hill before , their Lordshipv Ilia observations were directed to the state of the pour !MM....46 Bill wax then read a first time. The Earl of WINCIIILSEA gave noise that he should move the second reading of the BM on Tuesday next, if printed. The Marquis of SALISBURY, in reply to an observes don which had Wien from a Noble Lord . %petite, said teat he would give notice of a motion relative to the state of the poor laws for Monday week. The Duke of WELLINGTON mid he was happy that the Noble Marquis was about so bring the subject forweal, And he begged to assure him that he would do every thing m his pot er to aid hint in his investigation. He begged to assure the Noble Marquis that Government wee not in attentive to the subject ; but the real difficulty of the caste,, was this—the administoition of ohs poor laws Watt an various in different etointlee, that it was impossible to find out the teal evil. le one part of the cowry 0 different grievance tailor' from that which was complained of in mot h er , so A li t it wits impossible to fix ott a remedy which would apply to the eviN of all, The Noble , Lord lied, stated that the evils wee from the mal-adminietretion of ,he poor laws, whirl, bed led to an over-populations it was too much to expect that Government could kid a re medy for evils resaltin* ( f ew 0 4.4 1 44t r0t k 00 o f most laws, when it was coatideted how various was the nature of that mai-administration in diffident counties. It was his wish to give the Noble Lord every assisteinee in hii • power in carrying on this investigation, in order to see if a remedy for the evil could be found. He believed that a &est portion of the evil wits to be attributed to the ntunhert of Wel l poor resorting to this country, there being no provision for them at home. lie wits of opinion • that the remedyffor the mal-adminicuration of the poor laws was much more likely to he found out Icy the parishee than by the 'Ooverntnent. A galena remedy you'd not be 41000 ; for that which might he applied with advantage in Norfolk. kwinid hot be enforced In Kent and Suesee withccut the most serious consequences. - Government, in tail, cool I not attempt such a course ; bitterer) , thing in their pewee they tore most anzitunt to do for the disci very of at remedy. LOrdoSVPFIELD said he'did not mean to may that Ga. Vernment was bound to Snd a general remedy tier all the evil* of the poor laws, hut that they ought to have pro 'tided I remedy for that evil which had been echelon lofted In exist for ten years past; namely, the want of employ- Mebrfor the poor in every part of the country. This was .enational matter, and it belonged to the Government to find'the remedy. The Duke of RICHMOND rose fur the purpose of con gratulating the House that his motion of kat year was at length found not to leave been a factious one.—( Hear. ) flo was glad that this had been found out at last, and he trusted now that the country would tierive betotitfrorn ate discovery. The-Marquis of SALISBURY acid he felt bound to clefctxt his Majesty's Ministers on this point. lithe Noble Lord's' motion of last StssiOn had been confined to the poor lawa it tvould nut have met with opposition Brom the Go vernment. The-Duke of RICHMOND gait that, if that mere the feeling on the part of Ministers, they shush' I►a%ejircpoa ei ►in amend►vent to the effeet that tha latter part of his n u ►. alemild he omitted. The . House then adjourned at Eight otidoeit. itIOyISE OF COMMONS, THunsDAY, Several 11ieuthira a/Kik the oaths 4oti their lleYtl. COLONIAL SLAVERY. ,Mr; List prieented veloy petitions from plactis .praying far the abolition of sherry ; Sit Gionless Butreit prosentrd twelve of a similar nature from _places in Sutrult, ; Mr. Evans !mutated siatpfour , 'roar Leicertershire ; petitions against slavery were also presented from Peurbytt, liewessit:v-upon-Tyne,and Chat him ; by Sir W. Ingilby from 160 places in Lincoln ' shire ; by Sir IL Parnell from 16 places iu Durham; by Lord W. Paulen from 4 places in Northumberland ; by Mr. Robes t Grant from titre placer in Norfolk ; by sir 'llunmet Ackland, from 8$ plum in Devonshire ; by Lord Morptth frost 2b4 places in Yorkshire ; and by differeo4 Members from a peat number of other places. ThpSOLICITOR-GENEIIAL gave notice, that after the. Chrjstmas Recess he should move for leave to bring in a Bill for the better administration of Justice in the Court of Chancery. LABOURERS' WAGES BILL. Mr, LITTLETON poetpoue4l his uotiee of bringing in alba Int regulating labourers' wages, [tom the 18th lust. to.the.gol of Deet other, Mr, O'CONNELL presented a petition front the hat tars of Carlow, praying fora repeal of the Legislative Union between England and Ireland ; and untidier of a aituilar nature front natives of Ireland, rel.ident in London. EMANCIPATION OF THE JEWS, Mr. ROBERT GRANT %aid (on the presentation of a petition), that it was his intention, ufter the mitts, to Wing forward a measure for removing the civil disaliilitirs of the AAVI Hear, hear.) .. , 41r.,LIUDSON presented a petition front 'fenterden. complaining of agricultural distmo, praying for so imme— diate inquiry into the causes for Abolitlon of . Tithca and for Reform in Parliament. • Mr. DENISON preaented a petition from the Chur►h warder►r, Overseers, and Inbotiritmnts of the pit ish of St. Mary, Newington, complaining of the capenie of the new Police. Mrs ,' KENNEDY gave nutive the( on 11,1onday, the Mk inst. he ►rhould move for ►he production of pepetu connected with the Elective Franvhiorin Scutlund. prevented ovoid favoor Parliamentary Reform. • DR. PIDLPOTTS. Lord BEIGRAVE said, he hnd been requested by the Dean of Chester to make s communication to that Dottie, and in doing so be begged to take the, liberty of stating, that he wee not on wrote of very intimate acquaintance with that Re,: Person , but be had frequestly been brought into communication with him from the seal which he din. played in favour of the useful institutions of the city with whiuh he (Lord Belgrave) was ionnectra. The Very Rev. Gentlemen had csosidirehly promoted the welfare of :them estehilahmenta; and he frit that it wee also to his character to read the shitesment which he had just reweired from him. He hoped he should buys the pteressiou of the Howie. The Dean of Chester *a3e4 in s letter to/dres se d tee me (continued the Noble Lord), that be would. eiJerin it a greAfsvour if I would state to the House that her earnestly requested lion. Members would suspend their judgment respecting the subject of the motion t e hr brought forward on the 1$ h, until they heard his statement, Which he hoped to be able to prove satisfactorily to the House, that-in the be presumes to hope, that the ex parte eilegi t tioos end 40111Illetth in the newspaper*, which. it is obvious he cannot auswer, will not be suffered to th e judgment wbielt the lion. Member* of the House wit soon', have to pronounce in this ease. For Wroth', h e (Lord IL) would take the liberty of saying to ti e House, that by. simply .euspending its Jutivent, it wou'd not pledge itself to any particular opinion. Ile even con sidered himself pufectly unpledged, end would he guided only by the meth• of the 0116 C. POOR LAWS. The Earl of WINCHILSEA, in rising, according to notice, to move for leave to bring in a Bill to amend the poor laws, requested their Lordships' attention for 4 few minutes, while he explained to them the points which he sought to alter. It was, he considered, impossible for any man, who had witnessed the graduel demoralization o f the English peasantry, not to be affected with the necessity which existed to eon ect the abn.ea in these laws, which in his opinion, if not reformed, would *Owed the b,st interests of socicty.—( Hear.) The object of the measure he had to propose was confined to two points, one of which was to endeavour to restore the operation of the existing lass to that purpose for which they were originally in. tended. The other was to provide, from the first of No vember to the Ist of April, a mode of giving employment to the able-bodied labouring classes, to en title them to earn sn honest subsistence, and to prevent them from being thrown on the poor-rates, which ought to be devoted to the aged and infirm. By the 4.3 d of Queen Elizabeth, and subsequent Acts, the poor-rate was to be appropriated Ins the relief of those who, by age or sickness, were unable to labour. It was never contemplated that able-bodied men should receive the slightest relief frost the industry of othets-(11ear)--“nal it war also never intended that the wages of the labourer Omuta' he paid out of the poor rates. Both these causes lied the worst effects, anal had led to the lowering the spirit and the character of the working people of England more than any other measure that lie knew of. In the course of the winter he often saw thirty, or More, able-bodied men gathered together on the road, with an allowance front the parish of 6d. a day for each. This was not as it should he, and be could say, from personal conversation with the deluded peasantry in the county where he resided, that they were apposed to Huth a system. All they required was honest employ ment, and they did not want to be thrown upon the pal iete—(Hear.) The Bid which he sought to bring in would enable the Justices of the Peace of any particular parish to make an assessment from the Ist of November to the Ist of April, which was to be celled the labour-rate, and to be expended in giving employment to those men who were able to work, anal could not get it. By this means the man would be paid for the value of his labour, and relief would not be afforded, as at pre sent, according to the number of the workm.n's family. The system of paying in consideration of the num ber of the l nor man's family litti to Wettest on the one banal, and induced thoughtless men to contract imprudent and early marriages. The Bill, its he observed, would enable Magistrates to make a labour-rate ; and those oc cupiers of land who famed employment would be protected from the rate, so far us their work extended. An esti mate registering u' gh might the l y n ' all p o itnohyetihnleaelnamtpuplii:irknegel likely n t o e o f n ieni afforded th er, e p l e a 7 -1 ride anal the qu anti ty of them. He would not enter into the subject further at present. He would move that the Bill be read a first time, and be printed ; and he would gladly confer with any Nuble Lord es tQ the day on which the second reading could properly take place. Lord SUFFIELD was aware that was not the time at which' the Bill Wei to be discussed. At the same time he could not forbear saving that the statements of the Noble Earl were must true ; anal if the Noble Earl could ac. cotnplieh what he proposed, he would confer the lowest benefit on society. He was obliged, however, in candour, to declare that part of this plan would meet'with his de cided dissent. With regard to the operation of puor laws as they bad been in some places administered, he was con. vinced that they had a most demotaliaing effect. They had reduced the peasantry of England, in many cases, to Inigary ; and they almost unfitted them for the enjoyment of their social affections, for which, at one period, they were much distinguished. By the rattee of Elizabeth, the labourer whose earnings wets insufficient to maintain a large family, received relief in prop' tion to his whet . ; but the evil of the present system of the pow laws was, that the labourer who earns much receives little or no r e li e f proportionate ; while he who earns nothing, derives his whule maintenineefrom them. It was impos s ible to h ave devised a more unj ust seheme of apportionment than that which was at present in force. But this was not all ? some persons maintained that the principal evil was the in sufficiency of the wagesof ti.e labourers, by which the poor laws ware rendered more oppressively operative in one county than in another. Others attributed the evil to various direimilar amoegst many that were nettled, the heavy causes; taxation under which the country laboured was 'stigmatised as the principal obstacle in the way o f t h e but he did not believe that to efficiency s e e n e f y , t t a f ; i t t he w p as " nrolta,‘s ; inhis opinion, the weight of taxa tion that caused the present mischievous state of the pow' laws ; and lie maintained, in contradiction to those who asserted that the reduction of taxation would throw into employmeut the accumulated capital of the country, and thus enable the farmer to Ova the labourer higher wages, that the moment the pressure of taxation on the neces saries 'of life was retnoved, anal those necessaries rendered cheaper, the farmer would lower the wages of the labourer, so that any reduction in the amount of the times would not operate as a relief to the labouring classes. The cause to which he was Inclined to attribute all the evil was-the enormous superabundance of labour above the demand ; in saying this he was actuated, mat by fectious hut by very dull' rent motive,. h would be in the recollection of the Howie that the Noble Duke near him (Richmond) bud unwed, in March last, for a Committee of the whole House to institute an inquiry into the causes of the distress of the voutatry. Now, in hid opinion, those causes were not in volved in so much mystery as this preposition implied, and he we'll I state concisely to their Lordships what, in his opi nion, were the causes of this general distress; they wore sithply the inal-adminietration of the poor laws, and the au. perahundence of lab tor. If the Noble Duke, or amy other Noble Lord, would move for another Committee, in which the means for remedying these evils were to form the sub ject of inquiry, and the suggestion of such rumps to the Government for adoption was to be the result-of that Com mittee, he, for one, would support the motion, and he bail no doubt that every Nuble Lord present would approve of it. To prove this it was only to look at the state of things tinder which it was the duty of the Hulse to advise Government. The Government, es was very evident , waited for suegestians from other quarters before any cep were takers, for, in many recent cases, those intestates. which others co dsidered it their -duty to propose were .adopted ; it might even be said that Millicent waited for same turbulent demonstration of diasatlefeetion.' It wtr' well known to all those who were at all acquainted with the Nettle Duke's system of ware—he (Lord Suffield) was nut able to form an opinion on it ;—but it had been sle tiered to he what tatted 4 o waiting on the enemy," and he apprehemled that the Noble Duke had induced colleagues to adopt that course of tactic. in their filinieterte measures. Their success had .been proved in the OW 1 but, With whatever degree of eclat that system laad been punned by the Noble Duke in his warlike rufweith it watt one %villa was must petuicious in the Cathilltta Instead of anticipetiogibe approach of evil, they awaited PRICE 7D. 81.111-LETTING ACT (111 ELAND,) Ittr. O'CONNELL *lse to move fur leave to hring iii a Bill to repeal the Statute of the 7th Oro., 4, c , et), vow . manly culled the Sub-letting Aut. H e said t h at he b ed Wen induced to move fur the repeal of this Statute, think. Mkt that it was Mier end more convenient to make an origittel Act than to patch up an old one. The Sulk letting Act was peculiar to Ireland; it h a d nn y am i n England ; and he coati/oiled that there % t um id h e a „„,.„ made out to show why . the law of landlord end tenant should not be the minis in both countries. The Statute divided itself into two objects, and therefore it might be coneidereil as, le fact, two Statutes. The first psi t took up all ruining contracts and lessee; the eeeuttil part re (erred to eutitracia and leases hereafter.to hr made, The first, altered the stature of the coattail between landlord and tenant, by giving a literal meaning to words which .Ited only a legsl meaning before. And this, he maintained, -,was unjust, because it in fitet made this part of the Statute a n ex post Acta law. it *truck out a qttalificiation which was of advantage to the semi anti the contrary to the l a ndlord—which was is boon conferred upon the poor and exauted a kindness from the tich—accotiling tolhe aucient covenants a parole waiver was allowed, For although a covenant *night he made that the land ebotilil nut he let .:to wittier tenants, yet if the ninon did so sublet it, and the ,landlord knowing this reoelved one gale's rent, the ttoutratt theneeforth erased to be bindihlf• the principle of the Met part, he contended it wits a violation of eutatraet, and he trusted theta, was Ito unto in that M use would rite to defend it. The second part, he ad mitted, was purely prospective, anti therefore a legitimate topic for legislation. li, after the passing of it, men entered into contraets, they did so with their eyes open, and they could sot blame the Legielstuto for .entrapping them. This, second park, bonveer, opesnivil universally against su6detting of the lands of Ireland, with three excepted caire....thsf el s Ifase of Hies renew able for ever—of a lease for niatety , niite years or upwards; OW thirdly, of 4 1Ii lands in the itteeatotion of the Church—. which, by the way, were very extvoaive ire Ireland ; and ltd temerlceil, thst he never tome ii Choral of any creed or shade of &nhies that wits not eery attentive to its tem -1,84 an d inked u by the law, eitould n11411'4,10 between landlord gni tenant, cape. sully vhru, I n fore the passing of this Act, the landlord eould its two forme prevent his tenant frost noder.detti n g. The .tine I.c had already sileittioritil, in which a_parolo waiver was admitted I the other was to he Inutile effectual by a strict warthog of the coutract. " The result of this Act, therefore, was to take away from bellied all freedom in the only trade it a trade in laud. It certainly did not do this in words, bat it did i t i n f act for it prevented t h e lainilorti from distraining the under tenant, or, in other word*, tho occupier of the land. Thus it destroyed all freedom in the landlord, fur no man ,would consent to give up his right of distress, which was the only mode tho landlord had of rettovering, since tho w id,ll o t e nant bud no power of reeirtrOrislg holt, the occu. vier of the land. The quCstion was, ought the Legiele. , ture to intake to prevent the eantenee of under teurt,ts in Infant'? Ile thought not ; it te a , opinion that it wing he well for landlurds to cleur „their lands of untler.tetienti, heNitts aware drat it a si stated page alive 1 , ;yt. in the crc sl ttt'r, of lessens*, ;>[i l a3,t, as skit ti,;•i, t tutors it 1 watt 4fe4tVr yuaiut i t y sit provisions ir upo, the l.,l4lei therwas he di s p ut i ng t h e landlord's right i o t i t vitt of his under.>tenants ; he hall a right to do 40 1 6 1 41WtItit* landlord, in wtinin auto vst wouht alw:3-vs s, ally t~ ids so , the , ' lamoity,. might perloto colititios to that