The Sun. — London, England, 1854-06-23 00:00:00

ly will 0. , ll' ieJ '4° ~~ ahl the auction sale at ;e . ft` fter. 'o 73 1 ; la per 9d to 0 a to 4,1 doW I pate on tbi 'Wil ted 10f e ' Sprint; , s od to Oats , L to ill 80 5 i n dig; Os v°' ist. When jug jn ch adoA no 16 qcedallf iceaailf , ic eoon/ le 2 6 ae 16 • ae 16 l e 1 6 eert4l°' -,----- - _ - .„--- !'- .• /----&' - / if _.,,,'" e , _ 4 ' /---- - /T.e . . 3 -,.,..7.6 . _. ' e__ ' _ 1 . ...,„ . • . : -' I '( - ' • o.* . y ---' ' - ‘ l 7 " , a , i s 'TATIONAL FESTIVAL, in Celebration of the • 1 _.l:-) 1:Pk . .. ; - 7 " t'<- . t. , - - - ). 1 , :UNION between ENGLAND and FRANCE. —The LORD let - e • - , - . 4r I W .t ir,.‘ • 017 1. i t - - . 111- 1 k,':', :1 " 011 , Chairman. The Committee for conducting' the proposed , , I I ~ ? -'..- SP" .I. om .:' I • 4 . .1..-:: , t . wtainments and Festivities sit every morning, at the bianeion- 1 ' I . ~.4 t . 4ttiltif - '.4 'N - 's q , 0 -Jo, - ' trie. , , , ::. , i , ' '4,..t..ttot tt , t 2 -,-- 1 .---,_ .. ,•:! , \ 'tuilk , -- 4, 4 4 u lr o . us tn e, at Half - past 10 o'clock, where i•uhscriptions and additional .'..v; , i ,/ , , a i t ror e a s pi the committee will be received, and every information ' I';Z=4. l' '' 4 e , e t . 1 .....,,,.., •N If? , ,,, ,A . 4.41.- , :T v",,,.,_... . f • . -/ A .‘• ay ' .Ir , sk i i,.., ,441, ' --. ) By order. GEORGE SE LiGWICK, Hon. Sec. - 'C - ..-Irk ._ , ' - -04 .: 4,4 1i44-' , ll lo ct „fr - ~ - 5... -- 1 , ez, 11 - .1:3 pl y -' ', ' - \\• ,-T , -?* I' ~., "2- ' .IN ,r,..7 4, 4 Yi,l ' N ' , I, ~ D1.E. 13 "" - - ~ , - tA .... ~ , r, - "! hit - • \:,: ...16,4i .. ,"---- lit ' •, . ' ,i.• ,• • .1 , uLT • .v. - 4 •_____,..-- ~ LONDON and NORTH-WESTERN RAIL WAY.—To CONTRACTOR , . and BUILDERS. „.1 11 e Directors of the London and North-Western R a ilway Cora nnY are desirous of recei , ing TENDERS for the EXECUTION of 40 DITIONAL WORKS at CAMDEN STATION. _,ParUes desirous of tendering are revestod to attend at the En- Enter's Office, Euston Station at 12 o'clock on MONDAY, July 3, aPPoint a person to take out the quantities on their behalf; and " drawings and specifications may be seen on the same day. Tenders addressed to the Secretary, at this office, to be sent in 0 1 or before Monday, July 10, at 10 o'clock. By •order. CHAS. E. STEWART, Secretary. Elution Station, June 19,1954. No. 19,265.] NEW SCOTTISH STORY BY THE AUTHOR OF "MARGARET MAITLAND." Now ready at all the Libraries, in 3 vols., MAGDALEN HEPBURN; By the author of " Margaret Ma'fiand." Hurst and Blackett, Publishers, successors to Henry Colburn, 13, Great Marlborough•street. Orders received at all the Libraries. -.. LONDON & NORTH-WESTERN RAILWAY. To CONTRACTORS and BUILDERS. The Directors Dittos London and North• Western Railway C0m „7,',%37 are de-irous of receiving TENDERS for the ER ECTION of '.,? I )ITIONAL WORKSHOPS and SHEDS at W OLVERTON AIO N. Par T ties desirous of tendering are requested to attend at the Engl ine-e1 Fo Oftiee, Eustoi Station, at.,42 o'clock on TUESDAY, the 27th ,to appoint a person to take out the quantities on their behalf, ." "Lit the d raw ings and specifications may be seen on the same day. Tenders addressed to the Fecretary , at th i s office, to be sent in on before Wednesda y -, July 12, at 10 o'clock.—By order, CHAS. E. STEWART, Sec. Eutton Station, June 19, 1834. • - BRITISH AND NEUTRAL COMMERCE. This day is published, in one volume, 12mo , price 55., cloth boards, I` HE RIGHTS of BRITISH and NEUTRAL 1 COMMERCE, as affected by recent Royal Declarations and Orders in Council. By JOHN HOSILCK, Of the Middle Temple, Barrister•at-Law. S. Sweet, 1, Chancery-lane, London. • NERVOUS AFFECTIONS. Just published, price 25., post-free 2s. 6d., AN ESSAY on SPERMATORRHcEA Its Nature and Treatment, with an exposition or the Frauds that are practised by persons who advertise the speedy, safe, and effectual cure of Nervous Derangement. By a MEMBER of the ROYAL COLLEGE of PHYSICIANS, London LONDON and NORTH-WESTERN and MIOL kND R t,ILWAYS.—EXCURSIONS to the SEASIDE. ;pie Public are informed that, until further notice, FAMILY KETS will be issued from London to HARROWGATE, SCAR allies FILEY, or BRIDLINGTON, and Back, to of H not W less than Four Persons; thus affording families an „ PDortunity of visiting these wateting•places at the following Re- Fares (for inch passenger), with the option of returning, to- Vber or singly. on any day, not exceeding twenty -ei g ht days from 'e date of issue, by any through train except the express: - - Easton Station, London, to — let Class. 2d Class. Ror "'gate and Back, for each Passenger.. •• 40s Od 30s Od 13rborough and Back, for each Passeng er •• 60s Od 35s Od I , ll lllth y and Back, for each Passenger.• .• • • Od 35s Od tY anti Back, for each Passenger ••• • • • ... 43s Od 32s 6d *Wagon and Rack, for each Passenger.. •• .. 40s Od 308 Od These.l ickets are not transferable. _General Manager's Office, June 14, 1854. By order. THE MAIL STEAM-SHIP for AUSTRALIA, August 4, iBs4.—The magntfleent screw steatn.ship " CAL icyrlA," 1,800 tons, Captain J. GOODALL, another' of the fine fleet An to the General Screw Steam • Shipping Company, will be li es Patched with her Majesty' 4 Malls fbr Adelaide, Port-Philip, and 41 1 eY, on the 4th August neat. This fine vessel hasmalutained high reputation foirapid sailing and punctuality, and is a s ister , Pto v ie 4. Argo," which has made the quickest v yage to and from iTistralia up to this time. The Calcuttahas been employed carrying ,'lokails to and from England and Calcutta, and from her superior "8 and steaming qualities, it. may be fairly assumed that she will ke the ran in 60 clays. Rates of Passage mom 30 to 100 guineas. o n _e Will be followed, on the C h of October, by the CAcEsDs, Of' 2,500 p' ls t Full particulars as to Freight and Passage Money at the Com 'ay's Winces, a Cannon-street, City. STEAM TO THE CAPE OF GOOD HOPE. In compliance with numerous applications from persons de -58 to proceed to the Cape of Good Ho p e, the Directors of the sZeral Screw Steam Shipping Conipanr have determined to de their Steam ship " CAE OF GO 1401'E " •to TABLE t, on the 7th of Jul next. The "Cape OD of dood Hope," H. n. 0 p,„ ommander, has ,ut returnrom a mt sucessful 2, o ge to Constantinople wit j h s passenge e rs d and f general cargo, is 700 1, burthen, and 100 horse-power. Built by Messrs. Mare & Co., p„ 4 c k wal 1, and an extremely first ship. Iler accommodations for s t '" e 'engers are little if at all inferior to th is Company's first-class pi ant ships so well known OR the Cape and Calcutta line. The rates irs B age money are,--it irst Class, 60 and 65 Guineas each; Second ail 35 to 45 Guineas each. The ship will load and sail from Sonth sp-rn• As her capacity for passenge rs and frei g ht is limited, early estion should be made to the Company's Offices, 27, Cannon lteet, City. MALL LhASETTOLDS, held for long terms N., at low ground rents, to to peremptorily . SOLD, pursuant to an ► 01 the High Court of Chancery, made in a certain cause of ti k .Tr b eits v. Williams," on TUESDAY, the Ilth day of July, one i i ,.l 4 alid eight hundred and tlfty-four, at Two o'clock in the after trzi, in Two Lots, at the George Tavern, Commercial-road, near ie'ra.Shedwell Station, London, by Messrs J. and It. IKE 4P, the gul° ,l3 appended for that purpme.- Several LEASEHOLD M ES and DWELLING-HOUSES, number respectively 1,2, 2 3, and 21, Nelson-street, Stepney, held for em an unexpired term ht "Ytwo years, subject to a ground rent of eighteen pounds per producing a yearly rental of seventy-five pounds 4LN:teen 10 4t . fi g/- Printed particulars and conditions of a.le may be•bad ; 0 ,.. 18 0 'Messrs. Gregory, neulkeer GregorY, and Skirrow, gond in: I, Bedford-row, Holborn; of-Mr. J. J. solicitor, Read lot Mk ssis. Kemp,. Judd-street, Brunswick-Square, Middlesex; PrenUaes, and at the place of I) a • _ te d the 17th day of Jane; 1354.5a1e. • CONTRACT FOR IRON N4ILS, &c. Department of the Storekeeper General of the Navy, • Somerset-place. 23d June, 1854. ItE Commissioners for Executing the Office of Lord High Admiral of the United Kingdom of Great Britain tta-, 1 8th July Ireland, DO HEREBY GIVE NOTICE, that on .TUESDAY, kith next, at One o'clock, they will be ready to treat such Persons as may be willing to Contract for twelve W ` a 'lltlas certain, and afterwards until the expiration of six months' I, l :„ nt ng for supplying her Majesty's several D oc kyards with '`'N NAILS, TACKS, TENTER HOOKS, RIVETS, and BRADS. p atterns ti may be seen, and a schedule for m of the tender and con re oils of the contract obtained, at the said office. No tender will be I nes the one o'clock on the day of treaty, nor will any be noticed In:" tile party attends, or an agent for him duly authorised in writ i,4ll, the a ba addre,ssed to the Secretary•of the Admiralty, ear in the left-hand comer the words " Tender for Nails," and st so be delivered at Someriet-Place, accompanied by a letter th e ned by two responsible pevons. en;aging to become bound, with Jerson tendering, In the sum of 2,0001, for the due performance 2 ma e contract. IviNEW DISCOVERY IN TEETH. , R. HOWARD, SURGEON-DENTIST, 52, t .„ FLEET-STREET, has introduced an ENTIRELY NEW `2CRIPTION of ARTIFICIAL - TEETLI, fixed without springs, ~';` egi or :igatures. They so perfectly resemble the natural tee Zn y ot to be distinguished from the originals by the closest observ er; ; 4 : will never change colour or decay, and will be found superior to i; l 7 teeth ever before used. This method does not require the ex gere_tion of roots, or any painful operation, and will supp3rt and pre mve teeth that are loose, and is guaranteed to restore articulation ti ‘ 4 mastication. Decayed teeth rendered sound and useful in mas -52, FLEET-STREET.—At home from Ten till Five. tARON LIEBIG on ALLSOPP'S PALE ow I am Myself an admirer of this beverage, and my th experience enables me to recommend it, in accordance with 4 opinion of the most eminent English physicians, as a very agree ',e and efficient tonic, and as a general beverage, both for the slid and the robust.—Giessen. May 6. ALLSOPP'S PALE ALE ON IX is BOTTLED by PARKER and NINO, Beer Merchants, 534, PALL-MALL. (OPERIAL MEASURE. - Quarts, Ss. • Pints, 55.; Half-pints luncheon), 3s. per dozen, Also in 'Casks of 16 gallons and "Itrds. 11V4IESEMAR, protected by Royal Letters Patent of England, and Avured by the Seals of the Ecole de 14, --. arnaacie de Paris, and the Imperial College Medicine, Vienna. 1 4:8 , re tern. TRLESEMA.R, No. 1, 8 31 , - _---edy for Relaxation, Sperni a t o rrhcea, and Exhaustion of the TRIESEMAR, No. 2, tgee , f_,., et v ,,, - `"my, in the short space of thre e da y s, completely and entirely cate,s all traces of those Disorders which Capivi and Cubebs 0 - re 80 long been thought an antidote for, to the ruin of the health e Vast portion of the population. 6th TRIESEIIAR, No. 3, t tn ,. great Continental Remedy for that class of Disorders, which „jprtunately the English physlean treats with Mercury, to the in ,,table destruction of the patient's constitution, and which all the 7:aParilla in the world cannot remove. ,ItIE 4 .E3IAR, No. 1,2, and 3, are alike d evoid of taste or smell, 14, " of all nauseating qualities. They may li e on the toilet table v., - dhout their use being suspected. Bold in tin cases at I is. each, free by post , 2 s. extra, divided into , e i t Z ar o !lo doses, as admiWstered by Valpeau, Lailema.nd, Roux, tou' . l A' n e. — To be had Wholesale and Retail In London of Robert John- Cornhill ; Hannay and Co., 63, Oxford - stre et ; and San g er, s's vxford-street. 0 11 . •TIIE SECRET CAUSES pr SELF-ACQUIRED UISER LES • AND DISAPPOINTED HOPES. THE SILENT FRIEND. In Six Languages--Fiftieth Editton. th CONTAINING TOE 'REMEDY rox PRIE V ENTION or DunaAsa. •-.‘illStrated by One Hundred Anatomical Colour ed EngravingS and Cases. 114 W Edition, enlarged to 200 pr.ges, price 2s. 6d., by post, from the Establishment, Is. fid. in stamps, I :PriE SILENT FRIEND, a Medical Work on .P SE exhaustion and physical, decay of the system, produced by Cave indulgence, the consequences of infec tion, or the abuse of try, with directions for the use of the preventive lotion , fel , by observations on Marriage , and the dis q ualifications which 'went it. Illustrated by 100 Coloured Engravings. By R. and L. I titir and CO. Consu lting Surgeons, 19, Berners - street , Oxford - London. Published by Sherwood and Co., 23, Paternoster ;Foy,' and sold by Hannay, 63, and Sanger, 150, Oxford-street ; Gor -11,?' 146 , Leadenhall-street ; 95, Farringdon-street ; W. Sutton 10, Bow Church-yard ; Butler, 4, Cheapside ; It. Johnson, 68, i s ,,,,Pyr I. treat of the anatomy and physiology of the reproductive and is illt'strated by 23 Coloured Engravings. in thtiaur 11. treats of the consequences resulting from excessive 4 1 ,_.u, and their lamentable effects on the system, producing I n , -11 and bodily weakness, nervous excitement, and generative e Pacity. Illustrated by 10 Explanstor3 Engravings. ty , ANT 111. treats of the diseases resulting from infection, either in t y`e Primary or secondary form, and contains explicit directions for 14 e r t v r treatment. This section is illustrated by 62 Coloured Engrav • id ?ART IV. contains a Remedy for the Prevention of Disease by a I ? l Pte application, by which the danger of infection is obviated. sax V. is devoted to the consideration of marriage and its duties. e causes of unproductive union are also considered, and the whole Ject critically and philosophically inquired into. I 'HE CORDIAL F SYRI &CUM is exclusively employed 1 treating nervous and sexual debility, impotence, Er.c.,lls. and 33a. Z' bottle. The Concentrated Detersive Essence, an anti-syphilitie edY, for purifying the blood in cases of infection, secondary Ptons, eruptions, and the abase of mercury, Ils. and 335. per .:?ttie. Perry's Purifying Specific Pills, 2s. 9d., 4s. 6d., and its. 114 r box, a certain remedy for gon orrhoea, gleet, stricture, and !i , rate inflammation of the bladder. C onsultation fee, if by letter, 2 ' A minute detail of tho case is r e q uired : age, habits, and posi .l2n in society. Si. Packets, with advice, to be had at the Establish nt only, by which the fee, IL, is saved. Messrs. Perry, Surgeons, le in attendance, daily, at 19, Berners-street, Oxford-street, Lon from Eleven till Two. and Five to Eight on Sunday from Eleven to One. SECRET INFIRMITIEi OF YOUTH AND MATURITY. , aast published, price 25., illustrated with cases ; free by post for 30 stamps, N ERVOUS DEBILITY; An Essay on S perm atorrhcea, with Practical Observations o n a safer and .11710 re successful mode of treatment of the diseases of the Generative jstein, obtained by the use of the Microscope in detecting and ,%istinguishing, by urinary examination, the real cause and effect of excesses variety of complaint, whe th er arising from solitary habit., ~,.,''cesses, accident, or climate, followed by practical remarks, founded ir twenty years' expert.-nce in the treatment of Impuissance, _etvons Debility, Local Weakness, Spermatorrhma, I. To which : 40 addei, Commentaries on the Physiology of Marriage, with pre '4lltionary hints on the evils emanating from empirical practice, itcd 01 1 the dangerous remedies advocated by various writers on "'else important disorders. By SAMUEL LAMERT, M.D. • 37, BEDFORD-SQUARE, LONDON, Doctor of Medicine, Matriculated Member of the University of Edin butih, Honorary Member of the Lodonostal Medical Society, Licentiate of A.pothecaries' Hall, L o ndon , &c p . i , &c. The essential object of this treatise is to point out the fearful con- Muences resulting from certain habits, irregularities an d excesses, whichhave produced more misery in Youth, degradation in Man , and premature decay at all stages of Life, than, perhaps, any other class of disease known to modern pathologists. Its perusal is Dlrticularly recommended to persons entertaining secret doubts of pelt* phy s ical condition, and who are conscious of having h azarded tr h til ee(al.th happiness, and privileges to which every human be in g is u • It is absoluteltnecessary thatall men should know, that there are rinciples of personal manage ment which cannot be violated without • wea ning grievous penalties, and when wisdom and regret succeed • 0 heyday of inconsiderate self-indulgence, how these penalties nlaY be mitigated, how the sting of their bitterness may be removed, rd how the evil and its consequences m a y be avoided, and above all, at there is scarcely any degree of physical infirmity or functional derangement to which the timely a id of science cannot app:y a cure. The Author has for a series of years been engaged in an extensive ,Dractice in the treatment of th ese delicate complaints, which are "'fortunately teen too generally confided to the care 01 Ignorant 'HPlrics, who inflict great injury on those who are induced to place • faith In their pretensions. ITHRVOUS DEBILITY Inv be had, price 23, of Messrs. Piper, ....rothera and Co., 23, Paternoster-row; Hannay , 68, Oxford - street; 24 au11, 39, C3rnhill • or free by post for thirty stamps , to an y address recoil)* Author's iesidence, 37, Bedfoni.Square. At home for C9o4Riltatiga daily from Elven till Two, and tom Nil .U 4 12114, LONDON, FRIDAY EVENING, J UN.E 23, 1854. IVIR, ALBERT SMITH'S MONT BLANC, including the BERNESE OBERLAND and th e S IMPLON, THIS EVENING, and Every Evening at Eight o'Clock, (except Saturday) ; and Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday Mornings, at Three. Stalls, 33. (which can be taken at the box-office every day from 11 till 4; area, 25.; gallery, 15.—Egyptian Hall, Piccadilly. LAURENT'S CASINO, ARGYLE ROOMS, (Lessee, Cues. C. LAURENT, Onslow-house, Fulham-road), The above Rooms are now OPEN FOR TIIE SEASON ' . and will continue open every evening, with LAURENTS CELEBRATED BAND. Constantinople Quadrille, Sultan Polka, Fair Star Waltz, and Overland Mail Galop, by D'Alberti also, by U. Lalrent , the following Waltzes -La belle Francais°, Leonora, kins and his Dinah, Admission, Is. Doors open at half-past 8. Dancing to commence it 9 o'clock, and terminate at half-past 11. ROYAL POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTION. Under the Patronage of H.R.H. PRIrCF ALBERT. The Pub is is respectfully informed that this Establishment is now placed UNDER ENTIRELY NEW MANAGEMENT, and that alterations and improvements are in progre , s in all its departments, which it Is hoped will rerder it even more worthy of the patronage of the public than It has hitherto been. All communications in future should be addressed to J. H. Pepper, Esq., the Resident Director. .All the LECTURES, OPTICAL and other EXHIBITIONS, are continued as usual. Open daily from Eleven till Five, and every Evening except Satur day from Seven till Ten. Admission, Is. ; Schools and . Children under ten years of age, • L. lIYAM, 36, GRACECITURC R-STREET, CITY. Approach of Summer. THE approach of Summer is indicated in a variety of ways. Business assumes a new aspect, and active preparations are everywhere made. L. HYANI'S New SUMMER STOCK will be found both novel and attractive. The most decided improvements have been made in Gentlemen's and Youths' Clothing, and the tariff of prices reduced to the lowest and. most consistent scale. THE SUMMER DRESS and FROCK COATS at this Establ shment are now ready. The three essentials good M, goodrmaterial, and lowest possible price—guaranteed. A trial will ensure satisfaction. sity tests, and said that they had been abolished by the Long Parliament, but re imposed by the Episcopalian party at the Restoration, in a time of exasperation, in con sequence of their previous persecution. It was necessary : for civil and religious liberty that they should be abolished,;: There was one party that sought to interpret_the tests in a non-natural sense, and it that mode of interpretation were adopted, the test would be at once done away, but' he expressed disapprobatio n o f this method of being rid of them. He thought that the 'University would d:erive bens fit from this measure, and that the nation ought to share in such benefit. Petitions signed by 37,000 persons had, he said, been presented, this session, against the tests, and none in favour of them. Mr. COLLIER supported the clauses, on the ground that the system of university education ought to be a n icvi a lome t u i s o lirod n nsi sln. whichf one.HusEe HERBERT Be l i hsEal e idßv e tTi onat taken ntduyepi into d the t t tu, h hpa a eof t ntuen t r h ti vh e t eihsr proposed clauses the question whether Di ssen t ers were entitled longedenter into d ad mitted to the university, b u t would explain the course which Government intended to take. It was impossible to maintain the exclusive system which had hitherto pre vailed. Its maintenance, as regarded the interests of the Church of England, was neither politic nor justifiable. But the question was as to the best mode of effecting their object. The bill had not fared so well as he hid hoped it would do, nor would anxiety in regard to it end with its passing in that house. He was, therefore, the more opposed to the introduction of any additional matter cal cu l a t e d to i mper il it s suc cess, and he felt that such c l auses as were now pro posed would much interfere with its chances. He also urged that, the power of legislating for the University having been taken, from the Hebd oma d a l B oar d and. trans ferred to an entirely new governing, b dy, it would be most undesirable at the outset to show, that Parliament was unwilling to leave to:that bay. the exercise of autho rity. There was a strong feeling in the University in favour of, practical reform, and far more would. be gained by the promoters of these clauses if the alteration proceeded from Oxford than if the change were forced upon them. Nor would these clauses of themselves admit Dissenters if the University were unwilling to receive them, as th authorities had it in their power to impose theological ex` aminations and other restrictions even more distasteful than these tests. He therefore opposed the clauses, not believing that they would advance the object in view. Mr. MILNER GIBSON said that the argument of Mr. Sidney Herbert had been advanced years ago in answer to the same demand. The house ought not to delegate powers which it was its duty to exercise, nor was it be coming the dignity of the house to decline carrying out its views of public policy because they might not be acceptable in the House of Lords. Let that house take the peril of throwinc , out the measure sent up to it. He appealed to Lord John Russell, after his speech of the preceding day, to say something that day in favour of Whig and Liberal principles ; and he begged that members of the Govern ment might be permitted to treat this as an open question without incurring the displeasure of their chiefs. He argued that these tests were not part of the original con stitution of the University, but were imposed for political purposes, and no reason existed for their maintenance. He dem ibed it as a solemn mockery to ask the consent of boys to a set of theological propositions which not even bi . shops could_ understand, and upon which man were a lowed to differ. Sir W. HE ATHCOTE, in opposing the clauses,.said hat they would not place Oxford, as had been contended, on the same footing as Cambridge and Dublin. He denied that it would be possible to accommodate religious instruc tion to the tenets of various sects, as had been shown in the case of the London University; and characterised the proposed experiment as perilous. Sir J. RAMSDEN supported the motion, and argued that if it were of importance that Dissenters should be admitted to these invaluable schools, it was of still greater importance that the Church should not incur the reproach of intolerant exclusion. Mr.. HENLEY protested against the proposal, which tended to do away with all religious instruction at the University, and to reduce it to a mere establishment for the promotion of science and literature. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, though he did not concur with all that Mr. Henley had said, thought that there was force in what he had urged, especially as certain cheers seemed to intimate that these clauses were deemed by their promoters as part of a series of parliamen tary efforts to do away with religious instruction at the university. He should consider that, as the representative of Oxford, he was betraying a solemn trust if he gave assent to such a principle. He believed that, in regard to this question, they were bound to consider the bond fide interests of the Church of England. While that Church was a national institution the nation had a right to expect the teaching of the University to be of a religious cha racter, and moulded on the form of the religious in struction given by the Church. He stated explicitly that on the part of the Church he entertained no apprehension from the admission of Dissenters; but it was impossible to separate their case from that - of the Roman Catholics, and in considering the former, it must in honesty be held to involve the case of the laitar. He signified his concurrence with what Mr. Sidney Herbert had said, explaining that he had not understood the latter to give his adhesion to the terms of these clauses, but to say that, if due provision for the teaching of religion according to till. Clvurcil of—England 'could be made in the University, it would be a great ad vantage if the admission of ,Dissenters could also be pyo videefor. Ho did not think that he should be keeping faith with those who had assisted in passing this bill, by introducing so essential a change at the last moment. The clauses invited a departure from the whole principle of the measure, which was one of emancipation. They could not accomplish the object of procuring admission for the Dissenters, which must depend only upon the good will and free will of the University ; and by these alone could the difficulty be solved. It would, moreover, be most un worthy of the house to pass a clause by which the dis senter might creep in, but which would exclude the. Ro man Catholic. He also protested against any menace being held out to the University as to future Parliamen tary interferon ce. Lord STANLEY said that the course Government had taken was precisely that which might have been expected, and which they had ad o pt e d o f l a t e i n regar d t o every question of principle, especially of religions principle—a course which fixed them to no broad principle whatever. The country would have reason to complain of another in stance of indefinite delay. He was by no means so certain that the bill would not, in the form proposed, pass the House of Lords ; but Liberal members ought to be much indebted to that house, whose probable opposition was so often pleaded as a reason for not passing measures in that house. He was no advocate for interfering with the de tails of academical management; but this was one of those questions of national interest and impoOanco with which, in fairness and in common sense, Parliament ought to deal. A resolution of the house would contain an indication of public opinion which the university would not venture to disregard. He disclaimed any unfriendly feeling towards Oxford • but his ow n v i ews upon thi s ques ti on were fixed and definite, and he hoped that the house would not shrink from a decision upon it. Mr. WIGRAIVI viewed the opinions of Lord Stanley in regard to several of our institutions with distrust, and expressed his own concurrence in the sentiments of Mr. Henley. t e h h e lle ciru. Roman erlvh a. t J. C . a F t h Mr. LUCAS supported the clauses, and, on the part of tage of the opening which it was suggested was to be made surrenderedxiiusdildaitsetcdhlaeuimpwoehndoltaehnocyasdiesire to take advan for them. He considered that the 'Chancellor of the Ex sent system of oaths and subscriptions, en' a u n ti d li a ty ske o d f such was the way in which men should be prepared to fill whethert he pr e - leading positions in the country. Oxford, h 3 urged, ought to keep progr ess as well as conversatism in view. He de manded that the clauses should be granted as a homage to the right of private judgment. Mr. ROUNDELL PALMER denied that the Univer sity could be termed a national institution in the sense in which the promoters of the clauses used the term, and urged that it was national because it had always followed the fortunes of the national church, and because the nation looked up to it with affection. It was an ecclesi astical institution, supported by ecclesiastical endowments, made for ecclesiastical purposes. He resisted the clauses, as the first step of a revolution which the promoters of the clauses avowed, manfully, that they contemplated, but which the son of the Chancellor of Oxford, though sup porting the proposition, shrank from. He asserted that all the Dissenters would refuse to acquiesce in a state of things which must either withhold religious instruction, or tend to detach their children from their own denomi nation. • Lord J. RUSSELL—As the opinions of the hon. and learned gentleman who has just sat down are so very dif ferent from those which I entertain, although we may pro bably be found in the same lobby when we come to divide, I am anxious to distinguish my opinions from those which he has just delivered to the house. There are as it ap pears to me, two questions involved in the present debate —one is as to the admission of Dissenters to the Univers ity of Oxford considered as .a measure fit to b e ado p ted ; the other is, whether, there being a bill before the house for the better government of the University of Oxford, it is desirable and expedient that such admission, if it is right, should be enacted by one or many of . the clauses in that bill. Now, these questions being quite distinct, I will endeavour to keep them so in the observations that I shall address to the house. With respect to the first ques tion, I own I cannot think that any argument which has been urged in this house to -night, or any which I have heard on former occasions, has any conclusive weight against the admission of Dissenters to the University of Oxford. Let us look first to that which has been so often referred to, the main designs of the founders. We must suppose the founders—those at least of them who founded colleges in Catholic times, —to be in one of two conditions —either we must suppose them to retain the faith and the opinions which they held during their lifetime, or we must suppose that, wishing that the colleges they founded should conform to the opinions of their days , they would be ready now to entert a i n the views and opinions which are the pre sent opinions of our days. When the founders were told what were the doctrines of the Church of England, and were afterwards told the differences between the Church of England and the Protestant Dissenters, they would say the questions upon which the Church of England and the Pro testant Dissenters agreed were so pregnant with impor tance that it was impossible they could assent to the pro position, that one class should be admitted and another ex cluded. They would consider that those who differed on ques tions of transubstantiation, of the supremacy of the Pope, and upon other matter differed on questions so important and so affecting the foundation and root of their faith that they never could admit that persons belonging to the Church of England if fhowue go ldbeanientchluerdewday an d suppose—and I think it a fairin the benefits of the foundation. But supposition to make—that the founders would wish, if they had the whole state of opinion before them, that the colleges and foundations should conform to the opinion of the present day—then, in that case, they would bo dis posed to conform to the policy of the present day ; and that policy is in•favour of admission and against monopoly of religion. (Hear, hear.) The hon. and learned gentle man who had just spoken said the University of Oxford ought to . remain connected with the €urch of England, that it was so before the Reformation , at it had been so since, and that it ought to remain so nosy. Why; sit, with rogarcl to the period since tit* AgormatioN-wg must consider " that the University of Oxford, like many other institutions, partook of that system of exclusiveness—it might be necessary -exclusiveness,- which considered the Roman Catholics and the Protes• - tant Dissentera enemies of the Church. If you refer to tteltsc)t argumentsiawe Laws—those o se l .made a w e at whichthe time Re mu corporation c e el Catholics — and xmcededth e 'you will find that that is at'the bottom of the objections to the admission- of these two classes, that thee . were con sidered unentitled to the benefit of the institutions of the State, and that therefetre they should not be admitted. (Hear.) But is any such opinion held now:? Is that the opinion of the present day ? On the contrary, in regard to all the offices of the State, with one or two exceptions, the Roman Catholics and the Protestant Dissenters are generally admitted to those offices. (Cheers.) And let us see how this applies to the University of Oxford. 1 think it will be geurally agreed that the doctrine of exclusion, the doctrine of monopoly, should not be carried further than is absolutely necessary. (Cheers.) Nov, what is it that is necessary in the University of Oxford? I agree with the hon. and learned gentleman, that with respect to the offices in the church, with respect to bishops and to parsons holding the cure of souls, it is absolutely necessary that thoSe who hold such offices should be persons conforming to the standard of the church to which tbey belong. (Hear.) But how much farther can we go in this direction ? I think if we go so far as this, and say that the parsons go verning the colleges should be members of the Church of England, and should give religious instruction according to the standard of the Church of England, we should go quite ai far as is necessary in that direction. (Cheers.) I agree certainly that it is desirable that religious instruction should lee given in the University of Oxford. If lam asked what religious instruction should be given, I must revert to opinions which I think were quotedby the hon. baronetthe member for the University of Oxford, which opinions I held when the university college then called the University of London was founded. It was -founded for persons of different religious opinions. There was a proposal made by some of those who founded it that there should be lee tures given on general Christian topics, but that those lec tures should be so general and so vague that persons of all Christian denominations could attend them. It was my opinion that it was much better to have no religious in struction at all than to have a professor so qualified. (Hear, hear.) I therefore was one of those who, against the opinions of several persons I highly respected, objected to the institution of such professors, and I said it was better only to teach: classics and sciences than to attempt to meddle with religion at all if we could not be a religions body. I quite agree that the religious instruction to be given at the University of Oxford should be religious in struction according to the Church of England. When I have said so much I think I have said all to which the rule of exclusiveness should apply; but when I come to other questions—when I come to such a question as was argued by my noble friend near me, the member for Tiverton, in 1831, •when he asked if it was necessary that persons should not receive a diploma in various professions unless' they made a profession of faith according to a particular church —I own it appears to me that regulations might easily be made (if they were willing to make them) by the authorities of the university and by the authorities of the colleges that those persons who belong to families, whether of Protestant Dissenters or Roman Catholics, should receive' all that -in struction in science, all that instruction in classics, and all that instruction in arts which persons belongirig to the Church of England receive. (Hear.) Why, sire this is, after all—l don't care whether it is a national institution or not—this is, after all, a great national object, that if you have a university with a revenue of 150,0001. a-year, and have connected with that university men specially qualified to teach, men in the possession of great acquire ments in science and learning, it is desirable as far as pos sible that the nation should partake of the benefits of such an institution—(cheers)—and that you should not, by setting up a bar at the very entrance of the university, deprive a great portion of your people of those advan tages. (Cheers.) Take a man who is qualified to - become n a very eminent lawyer, or a very skilful physician. Is it a great evil and a great grievance that , because that man is the son of a Roman Catholic or a Protestant Dis senter, he should be 'thereby debarred from the advantages which such a university holds out, and be unable to acquire that learning and skill which would enable him to practise his profession with success? (Loud cheers.) I own I cannot find that there is any reason whatever in the objections made by the hon. and learned.gentleman who spoke last, and others, to admission, so far, to the benefits of the university. A young man certainly could not then have the benefit of instruction in the doctrines of the Church of England. At the same time there is some truth—though men in these days would hardly agree in such an opinion—there is some truth in the opinion more than once stated by Dr. Johnson, that the differences of Christians among themselves, after all, are more political than religious—that there have been great political differences among Christian sects, but that the religious differences are not so important as they at first sight ap pear to be. That is the opinion of Dr. Johnson. It is impossible, I think, to subscribe wholly to that opinion, but at the same time it is quite obvious that political in fluences have greatly entered into religious differences. But, sir, with regard to the young men who would then be unable to receive the religious instruction of the Church of England, it is a matter for their parents and guardians, rather than for us, to consider if their religious faith would be safe in the University of Oxford. An hon. gentleman ;who has spoken to-night=the hon. member for Meath (Mr. Lucas)—has said that if Roman Catholics were admitted to the University of Oxford, he does not think they would be disposed to take advantage of that admission. I have hoard, with respect to Cambridge, where Protestant Dis senters are admitted, that some of those Protestants Dis senters find that, whether by following the custom of the college to which they belong, or through the facilities by which young men receive instruction, they afterwards conform to the Church of England. But that is a matter for the parents and guardians of the young men them selves. What is the duty of the State, and what I think more peculiarly the duty of the university as a national institution, is to open the door, and whether these persons choose to enter or not is a matter entirely for their own consideration. I do not deny that the general character of the University of Oxford would still remain Church of England, and therefore most of those who went there would go to an institution of their own creed. But, sir, with regard to the second resolution of my hon. friend, I must say I cannot soo the policy or even the justice of the dis tinction which was taken by the noble lord the member for King's Lynn, when he said ho agreed that Dissenters should enter the University of Oxford as students, but he would not allow them to proceed to take degrees in the university. (" No, no !") Lord STANLEY—I said I thought it impossible to ad mit the Dissenters to hold office in the colleges, but I wished to admit them to all other privileges. (Hear.) Lord J. RUSSELL—I am sorry that I misunderstood the noble lord. The second resolution is, that "it shall not be necessary for any person, upon taking any of the degrees in arts, law, or medicine, usually conferred by the said University of Oxford, to make or subscribe any decla ration, or to take any oath, save the oath of allegiance, or an equivalent declaration of allegiance, any law or statute to the contrary notwithstanding." Of course the noble lord did not object to that resolution ; it appears to follow naturally and logically from the first. It would otherwise be saying, "I think it a great hardship to exclude Dissenters from the university, and if I admit them I know their proficiency, and that they will outstrip all competitors in learning." In such a case, to say they shall not proceed to take up degrees would be a much greater hardship than the present exclusion that exists. I would go so far as to say that, though they should not be admitted to the immediate governing .body of the colleges, yet with respect to any fellowship which does not immediately concern the govern. ment of the university, and with respect to any emolument which might enable them hereafter to pursue law or any other branch of study that would aid their progress is life, there is no objection to the admission of Dissenters. (Hear, hear.) I think the line might be drawn there. The govern ing body of the university and the colleges should be com posed of those who belong to the Church of England, but the exclusion and monopoly should not go beyond that. The hon. and learned gentleman who last addressed the house, said that Trinity College, Dublin, was not a case in point. It is only not in point because the young men there do not reside in the college, but it is in point so far as you have young men differing in religious faith from the uni versity studying there, and obtaining degrees in that uni versity. (Hear, hear.) So far—and that seems to me the greater portion of the case—so far it is an example ex tremely in point. I have now said that I think the admis sion of Dissenters should be conceded, and even pointed out the extent to which, in my opinion, it should be conceded. In former years I stated that I thought the questions of the admission of Dissenters, and the improvement of the governing body and the studies of the University of Oxford were two totally distinct questions, and that it would be desirable to keep them so. I retain that opinion now. If my opinion wore altered, I should certainly be at liberty so to declare it, but I retain that opinion now. I think we have a bill before us which tends very greatly to the improvement of the University of Oxford, which is not only a considerable reform in itself, but which is intended as the commencement of reforms to be carried into effect in this and succeedins , years. I can, however, understand the declaration which has been made to night by the right hon. gentleman the member fur Manchester. He says, " Here is a bill that is of no value ; indeed, it would be rather better perhaps for the improvement of Oxford that it should be thrown out, and another bill brought in." I take a different view of the question. I wish the bill, which improves the university system, to pass in its present shape. The measure as it stands keeps clear of the question whether Dissenters shall be admitted to the university at all—whether they should be admitted to all its benefits or to only a portion of them. Besides, the hon. member for North Lancashire admitted that the clauses he has now proposed would not effect his object, and that for that purpose it would be necessary to recommit the bill and propose other clauses in committee. lam sure the hon. member means nothing but what is perfectly fair, but I think it would have been doing only what was right and respectful to the house, if the hon. member had explained the machinery by which he expects to carry its object into effect. There can be no doubt that the success of the present motion would delay the bill for another week, and that the mere efflux of time would endanger the passing of the measure. Besides, I think it very probable that the insertion of the clauses would insure the rejection of the bill on the second reading in the other house. The noble lord the member for King's Lynn holds this matter very cheaply ; he thinks we ought not to attend to it at all, and conceives it to be a reflec tion on our course to' refrain from enacting what think politic and right ; yet I remember som e 20 year s ago standing by another noble lord who proposed to strike out a clause frtun a bill to which he attached importance — the Church Temporalities (Ireland) Bill —although he laid great stress on the clause, and dilated on it in introducing tho measure. Why did he act thus ? Because he thought that the retention of the clause would endanger the second reading of the bill in the other house, and therefore he struck it out, although at the time of doing so he con tinued to approve of it. The noble lord who did this bore then the name which the noble member for King's Lynn now bears. I stood by him upon that occasion, and I did not conceive that the noble lord showed any want of courage because he acted upon prudential considerations. In the present case the question does not regard the striking out of a clause which the Government deliberately intro duced into the bill when they framed it, but the admis sion of a clause proposed now for the first time, and sup ported by some who are not generally favourable to the measure. The right hon. member for Manchester tells us to do-what is right, and lays that we ahall bo wanting in L. lIYAM, 36, GRACEUHURCH-STREET, CITY. lIMMER OVER-COATS adapted for the race course or protneintde, are prepared from the choicest material, and in the grea • est v triety. Thee beautiful garments so necessary In our variable climate, are always on hand, varying in price from 14s. to 425. An early inspection is requested. L; HYAM, 36, GRACECHURCH-STREET, CITY. 111 HE SUMMER TROWSERS and WAIST- A. OATS brought out this Season are in such boundless variety and beivity that it is impossible to enumerate them. The public will do weltto call and select from this leviathan stock where low ness of charge combined with durability is insured. HYAII, 35, GRACECHURCH-STREET, CITY. UNEQUALLED BEAUTY IN CHILDREN'S AND YOUTH'S ATTIRE. NOTHING can suipass the neatness and elegance of L. HYAM'S DRESS for the YOUNG. The admiration of parents and guardians Is constantly called forth by the excellence of these well fabricated articles for juvenile adoption, all of which are supplied at unusually moderate prices. L. lIYAItr, 36, GRACECHI7RCII-STREET, CITY. THE BESPOKE OR ORDERED DEPARTMENT. THIS most important branch of L. Hyam's Establishment has been conducted with great success, and affords universal satisfaction. In this department the proprietor has kept four important points in view, viz., firm and fine fabric, faultless fit, fashion, and the lowest possible price. The profusion of novelties displayed, combining every material that good taste can suggest, will elicit satisfaction and ensure orders. The favour of an early visit is earnestly requested. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS-(YESTERDAY.) The house met at five o'clock. BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. The Marquis of OLAIVRICARDE complained of a breach of privilege in a return which had been laid upon their lordships' table. On the 7th of April last Earl Grey moved for copies of correspondence relative to any additions made to the department of war and colonies, and also with regard to any changes in the transaction of business relating to the administration of the army. On the first part of this motion the return was brought down to the 7th of April, the date of the motion - but on the second the very first paper was dated the 9th of May, and, in the shape of a letter from Sir C. Trevelyan, it was a complete reply to Earl Grey's speech. This was an undoubted breach of privilege, and if passed over, a moat mischievous precedent would be laid down. The Duke of NEWCASTLE said the return, in being made up to a date subsequent to the date of the motion, though technically irregular, was not quite without pre cedent. The return was made exactly as the papers had been sent in ; and as they contained a defence of two officers in the commissariat department now absent from the country, who conceived their charakers to have been affected, he had not deemed it his duty to withhold them, though he admitted that it was irregular to refer to their lordships' debates. The Earl of DERBY said the better course would have been for the noble duke to have received these explanations from the parties, and used them in his place in Parliament, rather than have made them part of a return. The return, as it stood, was much more than a technical violation of their lordships' priviliges. Earl FITZ WILLIAM took the same view, and ob served that the two commissaries in question could not have written these replies unless previous commu nications had been made to them. He recommended that the return should be withdrawn and amended. After some observations froM the Earl of ELLEN BOROUGH and Lord PANMURE, The Duke of NEWCASTLE expressed his readiness to withdraw the return, and to produce another in an amended form. ENCUMBERED ESTATES (WEST INDIES) BILL. The Duke of NEWCASTLE moved the second read ing of the Encumbered Estates (West Indies) Bill. The noble duke described the embarrassed state of property in the West Indies, and said the object of this measure was to relieve it upon principles which had proved so successful in Ireland under the Encumbered Estates Act. Having quoted several authorities in favour of the mea sure, he said its main objects were to wind up estates as under a bankruptcy, to effect judicial sales, and to dis tribute the proceeds among the parties entitled in the cheapest form, and to confer an absolute title upon pur chasers. A commission would be appointed to carry the bill into execution, consisting of one chief and two assis tant commissioners. The chief commissioner would, under all circumstances, be resident in England. The assistants would either act with the chief commissioner in England, where they form a court, or under him in the colonies, either solely or in conjunction with local commis sioners, to be appointed in cases where such assistance was necessary. An order in council would be neces sary before the bill could be put into operation in any colony ; but such order in council could not be passed unless upon an address from the local legislature, and provision made for the expenses of locally carrying it into effect. In all cases an appeal would lie from the decision of the commissioners to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. Having mentioned some other provisions of a minor character, the noble Duke ex pressed a hope that the measure would prove beneficial to the West India colonies, by encouraging the intro duction of fresh capital, by inducing residence, and by diminishing the number of middlemen or agents. The Earl of DERBY said some measure of this kind was absolutely necessary ; but he entertained doubts as to the efficiency of several of the proposed remedies. He reserved, however, his opinion until the bill was in committee. Lord St. LEONARDS doubted whether purchasers could be found for estates in the West Indies, unless at prices ruinous to the present possessors ; and he made several suggestions with the view of obtaining legal difficulties in carrying the act into effect. After a few observations from the Earl of Powis Lord Brougham, the Lord Chancellor, and Lord St. Vincent. The bill was read the second time. The Church Building Acts Amendment Bill, the Epis copal and Capitular Estates Management (1854) Bill, the. Witnesses Bill, and the Customs Duties Bill were severally read the third time and passed. LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL (CANADA) BILL, On the order of the day being read for the house going into committee on this bill. The Earl of DERBY, after a warm attack upon the measure as an attempt to change the constitution of Canada from a monarchical to a democratic character, asked the Duke of Newcastle to postpone the committee for a week, on the ground of the thinness of the house and the want of sufficient notice. _ _ _ The Duko of NEWCASTLE strongly complained of the course taken by the noble earl as unfair, and after some little altercation, The committee was postponed for a week. Adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS-(YESTERDAY.) The house resumed at six o'clock. OXFORD UNIVERSITY DILL. On the consideration of this bill as amended, Mr. PHINN said that, having given notice of his in tention to move a clause pieventing credit being given to students at the university who had not attained the age of 21 years, he begged to state that, in consequence of an understanding that had been come to, he had the pleasure of meeting tho Solicitor-General yesterday, and he had then rec9ived an assurance that the Government intended• to introduce a measure in reference- to this matter gene rally, and which would not subject students at Oxford to exceptional legislation ; and that iu consequence of the unanimous feeling which seemed to be entertained on the subject by both sides of the house, they expected to pass the measure this session. Under such circumstances, 'therefore, it was unnecessary to press his clause. Mr. HEYWOOD then moved the following clauses :-- " From and after the Ist day of Michaelmas Term, 1854, it shall not bo necessary for any,person, upon matriculating in the University of Oxford, to make or subscribe any declaration, or to take any oath, save tho oath of allegi ance, or an equivalent declaration of allegiance, any law or statute to the contrary notwithstanding. From and after the Ist day of Michaelmas Term, 1854, it shall not be necessary for any person, upon taking any degrees in arts, law, or medicine, usually conferred by the said Univer sity of Oxford, to make or subscribe any declaration, or to take any oath, save the oath ,of allegiance, or an equiva lent declaration of allegiance, any law or statute to the 90ntiViTY liOtWithitindOli , ", gio gems a hiltory of antler. London: Aylott and Co., 8, Paternoster-row. On Saturday, July Ist, will be published, price 2d., No 1 of THE EPITOMIST, a Weekly Journal of Lite rature, Criticism, Art, Science, and Manufactu - es ; c ,m -prising Fiction of the highest class, Reviews of new works, all the ecientiffc Intelligence of the Week, a list of Patents with a stracts of Specifications, a Domestic Miscellany, and Correspondence ; 32 pages, Bvo. Office 49, King William-street (City) , London. Order of all ' BoAsellers, and Newsvendors, in the Kingdom. CRYaT AL PALACE, 1854. Iv ow ready, THE OFFICIAL GUIDE and HANDBOOKS, illustrative of the CONTENTS of the EXHIBITION. To be had at the Palace and at all Booksellers and Railway Sta tions, and of Bradbury and Evans, Printers and Publishers to tlie Crystal Palace Company, 11, Bouverie-street. "ENGLAND EXPECTS EVERY MAN TO DO HIS DUTY.' THE NATIONAL PICTURE, by CLARKSON STANVIELD, Esq., of " The Victory, with the Body of Nelson on board, towed into Gibraltar," is ON VIEW. daily, at the Gallery of Art, 23, Coekspur-street, Charing-cross —Admission free " On no occasion has Mr. Stanfield treated us with a more magni ficent (I's, lay of his prowess. The picture possesses the mexlt, in separable from real excellence, of charming equally the connolseur and the crowd."—Times. COMMERCL&L.- , ---A. Gentleman of Energy, Integrity, and Ability, who is at home in the bTorth of Eng land, the worth of Ireland, and she South of Fcotiand, is just open to an immediate engagement.--Apply, P. S., 7, Falcon-square, City. TO NERVOUS SUFFERERS.-A RETIRED CLERGYMAN having been restored to health in - a few days, alter many years of great nervous suffering, is anxious to make known to others the means of cure. He will, therefore, send free, on receiving a stamped envelope, properly addressed, a copy of the pre scription used. • Direct the Rev. E. Douglass, 18, Holland-street, Brixton, London. I..;ONDON LIFE ASSOCIATION. Instituted 1806. Office, 81, KING WILLIAM•STREET. PRESIDENT—CHARLES FRANKS, Esq. VICE-PRESIDENT—JOIIN BENJAMIN HEATH, Esq. This Society is essentially one of Mutual Assurance, in which the Premiums of its Members are reduced after seven years. The rate of reduction of the Premiums for the present year is 70 per sent., leaving less than one-third of the original Premium to be paid. The Society also undertakes other descriptions of Assurance, in which the Assured do not become Members, and having ceased to allow any commission to Agents, the Society has been enabled to reduce the Premiums for this class of Assurdnces to the following very low rates : Annual Premiums for the Assurance of £lOO. I Age 1 1 3 3 . d. A 3 g s e . 2 s. d 6. A s g o e I s i d i 25 1 17 .0 40 2 15 5 55 5 1 0 30 2 1 5 45 3 6 0 60 6 5 10 The Court of Directors.are authorised by the Deed of Settlement to advance money on the security of Policies in this Association. EDWARD DOCKER, Secretary. NATIONAL LOAN FUND LIFE ASSUR ANCE SOCIETY, No. 26, Cornhill, London. Established in 1838. DIRECTORS. A. Campbell Barclay, Esq. John Moss, Esq. Charles Bennett, Esq. I Thomas Nicoll, Esq. Hugh Croft, Esq. M D. John Elliotson, A.D., F.R.S. I J. Leander Starr, Esq. Thos. Colley Grattan, Esq. Cement Tabor, Esq. Joseph Thompson, Esq. MANAGING DIRECTORS. J. Leander Starr, Esq. (General). I Chas. Bennett, Esq. (Financial). AUDITORS. Professor Wheatstone, F.R.S., and Professor John Radford Young. MEDICAL EXAMINERS. • J. Elliotson, M.D., F.R S. 37, Conduit-street. na E. S. Syes, M.D., 33, D avies-street, Berkeley-square. ACTUARY. W. S. B. Woolhouse, Esq., F.R.A.S., F.S.S., &a. ASSISTANT ACTUARY. Barker Woolhouse, Esq. BANKERS. - Messrs. Glyn, Mills, and Co., 56, Lombard-street. SOLICITOU. wens, Esq , 61, Moorgate-31reet. Total number of Policies granted from December, 1852, to December, 1853-1,194. _ _ Under the following heads are briefly enumerated the leading principles of this Society : OBJECTS Or THE SOCIETY. 1. A Life Assurance may be effected either by One Payment, or by an Annual Premium. 2. Policies may be effected WITII or without the privilege of withdrawing one-half of the Annual Payments. If with out this privilege, the rates are lower. 3. A Lite Assurance may be eff,cted on the life of another, on Joint Lives or Survivorship,. 4. Annuities, Immedia.e, Deferred. or Contingent, will be granted; also Endowments for Children. 5. Naval and Military Men, not in active foreign service, as sure without extra charge, and allowed to go abroad with out forfeiture of Policy, on payment of an extra Premium, according to climate. In the event of the Assured (when on the Withdrawal System) not r' attiring to continue the Pone , , on its surrender one-half the annual payments will be returned by way of purchase of his in crest therein. By this m an', apprehension of great pecuniary loss and doubt as to the intrinsic transferable value of each Policy is re moved. its cash va'ue being fixed and determined beforehand by the Society at one-half the annual premiums paid thereon : a vast class of s clety will thereby be admitted ; and every indivi nal, p hile steadily pursuing one object—a provision for his family at death — will have, by the plan of this Society, a door open to his savings, which will never be closed against his wattle or his use. Prospectuses; Report of last Annual Meeting, Forms of Proposals for Assurance, and every description of necessary Blank Forms, with Tables of Rates, and full information on all points, furnished, on ap plication at 26, Cornhlll, or at any of the Company's Agencies. G R AV SEND ST AR AUKET S. a the Greenhithe, and Purfleet Piers. tern as underlined (weather permitting) ACE PIER, GRAVESEND. No other Packets call The Packets call at the Pi F1:01/ TERIL WEEK DAYS. SUNDAYS. 4 4 v , CM _. . 4 iii tii -. ti Terrace t • 4 t i E - 1 W Pier E — Time ..2 , 1 . g t 7,, 1 2 ) , el 8 rn 0 .F. 1 5 $lB 856 to. 11% 11% -•— 1% 154 3 34 _. 33g — 5--- 6 , _ 614 7 _ 7}4 8 Direct Trains from the Boats marked 'l' e,—..lt.,ena fertm Venehllreh- street Station to all parts of London Direct' Omnibti every qua ARUNSV • Trains from the Boats marked uses from Fenchnrch-street Station to all parts of arter of an hour. WICK IV IIARF, BLACICWALL, on the arrival of lowing Trains from the Fenchurch-street Station. WENN DAYS. SUNDAYS. lo fol .5 , ... 5 t Fen- .v. ,, , , , Fen- V r,. 23 ...-. church 5 .E'. V = 40 ,.., church S' ; 1 14 0 Street I 8 o I 7, Street A g 4 1, II 0 P. ' 0 8 a ........_ ...... ......... ____ ....... 9 % 8 X 10 X —9% _ II X log 12 X II 2 1 d I% 41 -- 216 _ 4.5 x —3% 6;i __ 6% - _ Passages marked * are run direct. Fore Cabin. Saloon. To or from Gravesend and L0nd0n.......... 10d. .. Is. 2d. „ Gravesend and Blackwell or Wpolwish Bd. •• Os. 10d. ...--,,,. nr.vp.gend and Intermediate Piers.. 6d. .. Os. Bd. Jun direct. Fore Cabin. SI in. To or from Gravesend and L0nd0n.......... 10d. .. k 2d „ Gravesend and Blackwell or Woolw i e h Bd. Os. 10d. Between Gravesend and Intermediate Piers.. Sd. .. Os. Bd. BOAT TICKETS.—TweIve Months, 5.. Os.; Six Months, 31. Os.; Three Months, 21. Os. ; to be had of the Collectors on board the Packets; or of Mr. Monk, Terrace Pier, Gravesend. Fast and superior Packets to be Let for Excursions. Apply to Mr. W. Morgan, Agent, Star Company, Star Office, Fenchurch street Terminus, Blackwell Railway. June 14, 1854. REDPoy—ETShEe representatives NTATlON of fthe 't C to be acquainted with its condition and institut i ons , to be willing to the City C are lT Y generally o f ljapNted e°ec take a share n the business of the Legislature, and anxious to ad vance the interests of the country and its colonies. But who have long represented the city, country, and colonies in their business in terests and resources ? E. M OSES and SON I Who ha ve studied their commerce and have gratified the wishes of all classes ? Who are always returned by overwhelming majorities ? E. MOSES and Sox . It is their only ambition to represent. in the most efficient manner, the various stations in society by the most suitable, artistic, and seas mable attire. To do that with the greatest care, despatch, and economy, they hate engaged in enterprises which have no pa rallel. The taste and the claims of the world's constituency they fully understand, and no amount of business wearies their energies, or relaxes their activity. Whatever rrofe,sions they make they are ready on all cecasions to fulfil. Their attire for the summer season exbibits a very unusual degree of variety in materials, talent, design, and superiority of workmanship; and to order or ready mado may be obtained at their City or West-end establishments, at the most economical prices. Dress for juveniles and young gentlemen coming home for the holi days is best obtained at E. MOSES and Sox's._ It has the advantage of being more fashionable, comfortable, elegant, and durable than any offered elsewhere. Hosiery goods, the richest and most useful—fiats and Caps, the newest styles and most comfortable wear—Roots and Shoes, which cannot be equalled —may be procured at E. MOSES and Sox's, at considerably lower charges than are customarily mate. The largest wholesale Clothing, Shirt, and Boot and Shoe depart ment in the world is at the establishment of E. Mom and Sox. C Al/T[o l .'4.—B. MOSES and SON regret having to guard the pdbl c agaitut Imposition, having• learned that the untradesman-like falieh od of " Being connected with their Establishment," or " it's the same concern," has been resorted to in many instances, znet for obvious reasons, they beg to state that they have CONNEXION WITII ANY OTHER HOME IN OR OUT OF LONDON, except their own Establishments, as follows : L'ndon City Establishment, 154, 155. 156, and 157,. Minories, 84, 85, and 85, Aldgate, opposite the Church. all communicating. London West-end Branch, 506, 507, 508, New Oxford-street, 1,2, and 3, Hart-street, all commuicating. Bradford (Yorkshire) Branch, 19 and 20, Bridge-street. Sheffield Branch, 36, Fargate. Colonial Wholesale Branch, Melbourne, Australia. Merchant Tallozs. Clothiers, Hatters, Hosiers, Furriers, Boot and Shoe Makers, and General Outfitters for Ladies and Gentlemen. IMPORTANT.—ShouId , aay article not give satisfaction, it will be exellangcd if desired, or, if preferred, the money will be returned without hesitation. All goods are marked iu plain figures, the lowest price, from which no abatement can be made. The Establishments are closed from sunset on Fridays to sunset on Saturdays, when business is resumed till 12 o'clock. A new Book, with illustrations, entitled" The Echo of Public Opi nion," containidg full lists of prices, our system of self-measure ment. Bse., &e., may be had on application, or post-free. Id Yon: parle Francais: Qul at parla Italian. Ater opriolzi ow% politick Aqta liatA Ppano ,~f/« / [ PRICE SD. dignity if we do not assert our opinions, and leave the othet house to assert th e i rs . Th a t may be a yery good maxim, but I hope it will not be listened to in future days, as'it has not been li s t ene d to in days which are passed, by the House of Lords. Does the right hon. en tleman sup- Nee that the House of Lords, wh they adopt a bill, always act in accordan ce w i t h their own opinions ? No such thing. In many iestances they adopt bills in defer ence to the opinion of the country as represented in this house.- Does the right ho n . gentleman think that in t a : s; sehting to the repeal of the earn laws, the the the repeal ci o h s e their navigation laws, and to many oth er of iLords were merely following measures, . li own opinion and asserting their own dignity ? If the House of Lords should adopt the right houourable gentleman's inaxi and follow' his advice, frequent disputes Ti would Occur between the two branches of the Legislature.w( As it is, the House of Lords frequently—indeed, may say, commonly—defers to the opinion of the House of Commons and the country ; but in order to carry on the legislation of the country it is necessary that the House of . Commons should from time to time, and upon questions that' are not of vital importance, consult the opinion and feeling of the other house. For these reasons, I think it would be inexpedient to risk the success of the bill in the other house by adding the clauses now prciposed. I think it advisable that the university, with its new'and improved constitution, should have the oppoetunity of eon- . sideriug and determining on the question of the admission of Dissenters. lam ready to say, however, that if the university - should disappoint my expectation in this mat ter—if it should continue to refuse to admit the whole of the people to a participation in the benefits of that insti tution, the State would have the right of compelling it to take that course by passing a bill for the purpose e .andl go further, and say that, under those circumstances, such a bill ought to be introduced. The house, however, should recollect that this question has been under the censidera tion of Parliament on many occasions, after intervals of several years. The question was brought forward in 1834, when I took part in the debate and voted in favour of the motion. It was not again introduced for a considerable period, and now it .is introduced after an interval of six or seven years. This shows that the Dissenters have not thought the question one of pressing urgency. They have shown their willingness to wait. (A. laugh.) Having waited so long, why not wait a few years longer? (" Oh, oh," and laughter.) I believe that if you press the ques tion now, you will fail in carrying it, and that if you press it in a few years hence you are pretty certain to suc ceed. (Laughter.) For my part, I have always voted for the admission of Dissenters to the universities when ever the question has been brought on. It is not my fault that the question has not been pressed every year; if it had I should have voted for it, but I cannot consent to the introduction of the clauses into the bill, because I think it would cause the measure to be defeated. Mr. GIBSON said the noble lord appeared to have mis understood what fell from him. He did not say that he wished the clauses to be introduced in order to cause the defeat of the bill, but that the loss of the bill might be re paired by the introduction of a better measure in a future session. Mr. HEY WOOD, amidst cries for a division, was under stood to say that, upon the present occasion, he was chiefly anxious that tie principle involved in his clauses should be established. The house then divided— For the clause 252 Against it l6l Majority —9l The cheers at the announcement of the numbers were loud and long continued. The clause for the admission of Dissenters to the Uni versity of Oxford was then added to the bill. Mr. HEYWOOD then moved that the following clause be also added to the bill :—" From and after the first day of Michaelmas term, 1854, it shall not be necessary for any person upon taking any of the degrees in arts, law, or medicine, usually conferred by the said University of Ox ford, to make or subscribe any declaration, or to take any oath, save the oath of allegiance, or an equivalent declara tion of allegiance; any law or statute to the contrary not withstanding." Lord J. RUSSELL—The house having declared its opinion so unequivocally on the first amendment, I beg to state that it is not my wish to take a division on the second amendment proposed by the hon. gentleman. Mr. WALPOLE rose amid loud cries of " Divide !" One word (said the hon. gentlemen), and only one word on the second clause. The house has simply affirmed at the pre sent moment this proposition, that for the purposes of educa tion (the ground taken by my right hon. friend the Chan cellor of the Exchequer) there shall be no bar to the ad mission of Dissenters to the university. But the second question which is now going to be put to the house is this —whether for the purposes of government—(No, no) — whether for the purposes of government— (No, no). The right hon. gentleman who cries " No, no !" cannot have considered the distinctive difference between the two clauses. By the clause which you have just adopted you admit Dissenters to the university for the purposes of edu cation but by the second clause now proposed you admit Dissenters to take degrees which will enable them to vote in convocation, and a distinct power will be given to Dis senters to take part in the government of the university. (Loud cheers.) But that is not all. If you pass this second clause, not only will you give to Nonconformists the power of government in the university, but you will give to them a right to claim a share in endowments which it was never intended they should participate in. (Cries of "No Pend cheers.) I am surprised that the 'noble lord should - give up his principles, as he seems prepared to do. I appeal most earnestly to the Government to persevere in their op position to the second amendment, and I do not despair, if they will stand firm and true to their opposition, though they may not succeed this evening, they will be able on another occasion to carry their own proposition into effect, which proposition is, that since you have given freedom to the university, and freedom to the colleges, you should leave toThem the-option and trust to them the discretion of determining, since you have decided that Dissenters shall have the right of being admitted to the university, upon what terms and in what way they are to be admitted, so as not to interfere with the general efficiency of the university, nor with that religious education which alone ought to be continued within the precincts of the university. (Cheers.) Whether the noble lord and his colleagues will cry " Ay" upon this clause with those with whom they have cried "No" upon the other, I do not pretend to say, but whether I go into the lobby alone or not—(loud cheers from the Opposition)—l will raise my voice and give my vote against this second clause—(cheers)—and the only words I will add are, that the Government are bound to support me. Mr. BROTHERTON rose amid cheers, cries of " Oh" and " Divide!" which rendered his voice inaudible. Mr.V. SMITH also attempted to address the house, but the confusion and excitement were so great that not a syllable reached the gallery. Lord J. RUSSELL—I beg to say that what I said was that, I did not wish to divide the house after the uneclui vocal expression of its opinion. But having argued against this clause, if there is a division I shall vote against it. (Loud cheers from the Opposition.) The house again divided— Far the clause 196 Against ... 205 Majority After the cheering with which the announcement was received had subsided, Lord J. RUSSELL said he proposed to proceed with the report to-day at 5 o'clock. , In answer to Mr. WIGRAM, Lord J. RUSSELL said it was very desirable that the bill should go early to the House of Lords, and he hoped the house would consent to its being read a third time on Monday. Mr. WIGRAM asked if notice would be given of any amendment to be proposed by the Government. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said the Government had several amendments to propose on the re port, but all in accordance with the previous understanding of the house. If they had any, material amendment upon any portion of the bill, or on the clauses introduced, they would move it on the third reading, and give notice to morrow. Mr. BRIGHT said, unless the hon. member for North Lancashire again asked the opinion of the House on the clause which was the subject of discussion that evening, on the third reading he should do so. The division on the question had been so peculiar, the noble lord the leader of the house having stated that the second resolution followed naturally and logically upon the first, that he hoped by Monday the noble lord would find means of con rerting some of the hon. gentlemen who sat near him, as it was very desirable the question should be settled ; and really, having carried the first proposition. what could be so natural as that the other should follow ? He hoped after two or three days' consideration they • would be able to carry the second clause, perhaps without a division — (laughter)—but, at all events, by a respectable majority. Some 'reference had been made to the House of Lords ; that house had conceded matters before in deference to public opinion and the wish of the House of Commons, and he appealed to the noble lord to urge upon his col leagues in the other house- to adopt on the present occa sion a similar course, which he was sure was one that would strengthen their position with the public. Mr. HEYWOOD said lie thould certainly move the in troduction of the second clause again on the third reading, and gave notice accordingly. Mr. NEWDEGATE was convinced that a great number of hon. members did not exactly understand the connexion that existed between the first and second clauses. (Cr usted ies of " Oh.") Ho n: members might cry "oh," but he tr and believed that those hon. members not in London at present would be in their places on Monday, and, instead of the majority they had seen in favour of the clause,. the o re f. would be somethin g bers of more li the Church ofke a legitimat England on this the feeling of mem point. He was quite confident that such a change would be seen in the numbers on the two divisions as would indi cate deny that there had been a misunder standin g on th e s ubject. " Oh, oh !") EXCISE DUTIES (SUGAR) BILL. On the motion for the third reading of this bill, Mr. HANKEY hoped the hon. gentleman the Secretary of the Treasury would give seine explanatniosnedupeforn btrhoewpirong posed additional duty of 75 . upon su gar purposes, and which he had promised to consider, with a view to its reduction, on a former occasion. Ile (Mr. Sankey) suggested 6s. would be quite sufficient. Mr. WILSON said, that the rate proposed was some what higher than, upon reconsideration, was thought ne cessary, and he should now move that a duty of 6s. 6d. be substituted for the proposed duty of 7s. The motion was agreed to, and the bill, having been read a third time, was passed, after a few words from Mr. WA/ARON, who recommended that, in order to en courage the high agriculturists, the duty on beetroot sugar used in brewing should b e h a lf th e d u t y i mpos ed on foreign sugar. The house resolved into committee on the Warwick Assizes Bill. Mr. DIGBY SEYMOUR said, that in the part of the house where ho was sitting, he could not understand what was going on, and, as a bill of his, the Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes Bill, which stood o n the order paper, had been passed over without his knowledge, hemoved that the Chairman report progress. The committee then divided , w hen there were Forreporting progress .. ....... . ........... 25 • Against it ............. . ............................. —4 83 .8 Majority .............................. .... The bill then went through committee with some verbal amendments. The house adjourfl at 20 Want% after 1 e ed clockt ~~ - 2:.-Z -r._, -- 71.irmAtENT4Rr .bIrISIONS; ROUSE OF COMMONS—JUNE 22; OXFORD UNIVERSITY BILL. Clause considered—That it shall not be necessary for 16111! person, upon matriculating intthe University of Oxford, t o take any oath, save the oath of allegiance, or an *gni• valent thereto. For the second reading, ayes 252, /zoos 16L AYES-252. Adair, IL Freestun, Col. W. Mentz, G Aglionby, H. Frewen, C. Murrough, J. Alcock, T. Gardner, R. Naas, Lord Anderson, Sir J. Gaskell, J. Noel, G. Annesley, Earl Of Geach, C. Norreys, Lord Atherton, W. Gibson, T. Norreys, Sir D. Batley, Sir .1 - ,, Gilpin, Col. H. North, F. Ball, E. Glyn, G. Oakes, J. Ball, J. Ooderich, Viscount. O'Brien, Sir T. Barnes, T Gower, F. O'Brien, C. Barrington, Viscount Grcenall, G. O'Connell, J. Bass, T. Green, Capt John Oliveira, B. Bateson, Capt T. Gregson, S. Otway, A. Beamish, F. Grenfell, Chas. Pechell, Sir G. Bell. I. ' Greville, Col. P. Pellatt. A. Berkeley, Hon. C Grey, K. Percy, J. Biddulph, Col. R.N. Grosvenor, W. H. Perry, Sir T. Biggs, W. Hadfield. G. Pete, S. Blackett, J. P. B. Hall. Sir 8. Philipps, J. Blair, Col. J. H. Hankey, T. Phillimore, J. O. Bonham-Carter,.T. Tiastie, Alex. Phlnn, T. Plastic', Archd. Hayes, Sir E. riiklngton, I. Pinney, W. B ll o o w ut y •e c ri r, e, a l . lon. E. P. cilam, Boyle, Lt.-Col. Iloa T. ronarr.Urquhaft, R. Ileatheote, G. Brady, J. Ponsonby, A. H.B. W. Heneage, Geo. P. Potter, R. Brand, Heyworth, L. Price, W. Br ight, ehu ßr J. rst J. Higgins, G. 0. Ramsden, Sir J. Ricardo, J. _ m Sir J, W. Islcar4o, 0, /3 Brockman,ro t 11 er ton , E l. no 1) ' Hindley, C. Brown, H. Horsfall. T. Rich, H. Housman, E. Robartes,'T. Brown, W. Howard, C. Robertson, P. Bruce, .A. - Burke, S H ir T. Hudson, G. Boauck, J. Butt, I. ' Hutchins, E. Bolt, P. Byng, G. Hutt, W. Russell, F. C. Cairns, H. Ingham, R. Sawle, C. Campbell. Sir A, Jackson, W. Scholefleld, W. Castlerosse, Viscount Jocelyn, Viscount Scobell, Capt. G. Cavendish, C. ' Johnstone, J. Scott, F. Cavendish, 0 ; Keating, R. Scilly, F. C syl ey, S. Keating, H. Scully, V. Challis T. Kendall, N. Seymour, Lord Chaplin, W. Kennedy T. Seymour, FL i Cheetham, John Kershaw, J. Seymour, W. Christopher. itobt. A. King. 1.. Shatto R. Clay, Sir W. 13t. Kinnaird, A. Shee, Sent. W. Clifford, Lt.-C01.H.34 Kirk. W. Sheridan, R. Cobden. R. Knightly. B. Smith, J. A. Cofflu, W. lateen; E1r..11. Smith, I. 3. Cogan, W. H.T. Ulna. 15. Smith, R. Craufurd, E. H.J. Langston. J. IL Stafford, Marquill Crook, J. Taunton, H. G. Stanley, Lord Crossley, F. Laslett, W. Stirling, W. Carrie, Halkes Layard, A: H. Strickland, sir G. Davie, Sir H. R. F. Lee , W. Strait E. Davison, R. Lennax, Lot dia. Stuart, Lord D. Denison, J. E. Liddell, 11. G. Tancred. IL Dent, J. Lindsay, W. Thicknessc, It, Bering Sir E. C. Locke, J. Thompson, G. Divett, E. Lockhart, A. E. Thornely, T. Dud, J. W. Lucas, F. Thornhill, W. Duff, G. . Macartney, G. Tuilemache, J. Duff, J. Mackie, J. Towline, G. Dake, Sir J. M'Cann, S. Traill, G. Duncan, G. Macgregor, John 'Uxbridge, Earl Buncombe, T. Mac Mahon, P. Vane, Lord it. Dundas, G. McTaggart. Sir S. Vane, Lord A. Dunlop, A. Macgutre, J. Vansittart, G. Dunne, Col. Mandeville, Vie. Vernon, G. Egerton E. • Mangles, R. D. Vivian, J. H, Ellice, E. Manners; Lord G. Vivian, H. H. Ellice, E., km. Majoribanks, D. Walmslef Sir J. Elliot, J. Massey. W. Whitbread, 8. Emlyn, Via. Miall, E. Wickham, H. W. Ewart, W. Milligan , R. Wilkinson, W. 'Tendert, M. Mills, T. Wilcox, B. Fergus, J. Milner, W. Williams, W. Fitzgerald, W„ Michell, Dr. W. Winnington, Sir T. Foley, J. Mitchell, T. Wise, A. Forster, C. Moffatt, G. Woodd, B. Forster, J. Montgomery, Sir G. Wyvil, M. Fox, R. Morris, D. MU'S. Fox, W. Mostyn, E. Heywood, J. Franklin, G. Mullings, J. Collier, 4. P. G~-~ NOES-161. Acland, Sir T. Goddard, A. Ossulston, Lard A'Court, C. Gera, W. Packe, C. Adderley, C. Goalburn, H. • Pakington, Sir J. Archdall, M. Graham, Sir J. Palmer, Robert Arkwright, G. Graham, Lord hf. • Palmer. Roundeli Bailey, C. Granby, Marquis of Pahnerston, Fig Baldock, E. Grey, Rt Hon Sir G Parker, R. 1 Baring, H. Gwyn, H. Peel, Sir R. Barrow, W. Hale, R, Peel, F. Beckett, W. Hamilto n, G. A. Peel, Col. J. Bective, Earl Hamilton, J. H. Pennant, Col. E. Bennet, Capt P. Harcourt, G. Phillimore, R. J. Bentinck, Lord H. Harcourt-Col. F. Portal M. Bentinek, G. Heathcote, Sir W. Powlett, Lord W, Beresford, Rt. Hn. W. Heneage, Geo. 11. Pritchard, J. Berkeley. G. Henley, J. Pugh, D. Bethell, Sir R. Herbert, S. Repton, G. Branston, T. W. Hervey, Lord A. Russell, Lard J. Bruce, Lord E. Hilyard, R. C. . . Sandars, G. Buckley, Gen. Hotham ' Lord Seymer, 11. Burrell, Sir C. Hughes, W. Shirley, E. Burroughes, H. Irton, S. Smijth, sir W. Cecil, Lord R. Johnstone, Sir J. Smith, W. Chelsea, Viscount Joiliffs; Sir W. Smith, Abel Clinton, Lord R. R. P. Jones, Capt. 2'. . Somerset, Capt. N. Clive, Hon. R. H. . Knatchball, W. Sotheron, T. Cobbold, J. C. Knox, W. S. Spooner, R Cocks, T. S. Lan i,ton, W. W. P. G Stafford, A. Codrington, Sir C. W Lascelles, E. Stanhope. J. Coles, H. B. Lawley, F. C. Startle, Le (I. Colville, C. R. Legh, G.C. Sutton, J. Compton, 11. C. Lennox, Lord A. F. Taylor, Lt.-Col. 1. Cowper, W. F. Liddell, it. T. Tnesiger, Sir F. Cuhitt, W. Lindsay, C01..T. Tudway, It. Deedes, W. Lisburne, Earn Tyler, Sir G. • Denison, E. B. Lockhart, IV. Tyrell, Sir J. Disraeli, B. Lovaine, Lord Villiers, F. Drumlanrig, Via. Lowther, Capt. Vyse, Capt. H. Duncombe, Hon. 0. Luce, T. Waddington, H. Duncombe, Hon.W. Macgregor, Jae. Walcott, Admiral Da Pre, C. Maddock, Sir T. H. Walpole, S. East, Sir J. Dialing, R. West, F. Egerton, Sir F. March, Earl of Whitmore, H. Egerton, W. Masterman, J. Wigram, LoftuA T. Elmloy, Vis. Maunsell, T. Willoughby, Sir R. Evelyn, W. II eux, Sir H Wood, Sir C. Farnham E. Mlles, W. Wortley, J. A. Farrer, J. Morgan, G. Wynn, Major W. Fellowes, E. Mowbray, J. Wynne, W. Ferguson, ;fir It. Manly, W. Yorke, E. • }Miler, Sir E. Napier, J. Young, Sir J. Floyer, J. Neeld, John Forbes, VV. Newark. ViSCCiUnt TELLERS. Galway, Vlrempunt. Newdegate. C. HaYter. IV- Glazistone, W. North, Lt.- C01..T, Midgrave, Earl of Another clause (Ur. Heywood)—That it shall not be neces• sary for any person, upon taking any degrees in law, art, or medicine, in the University of Oxford, to take any oath, save the oath of allegiance, or an equivalent. For tho second reading of the clause ayes 196, noes 205. AYE;--196. _ _ Adair, 11. Fox, R. Aglimby, 11. Fox, W. Alcock, T. Freestun, CoI. Anderson, Sir J. Gardner, R. Atherton, W. Gaskell, J. Ball, E. Leach, C Ball, J. Gibson. M. Barnes, T. Glyn, G. Bass, M. Goderich, Viscount Beamish, F. Gower, F. Bell, J. Greene, Capt. John Berkeley, Hon, C. Gregson, Samuel Biddulph, Col. R. M. Grenfell, Charles Biggs, W. Greville. Colonel F. Blackott, J. F. B. Grey, R. Bonham-Carter, .1. Grosvenor, Ld. R. Bouverie, Hon. E. P. Hadfield, George Bowyer, G. Hall, Sir Benjamin Boyle, Lt.-COL Hankey, T. Brady, J. nestle. Alex. Brand, H. B. W. nestle, Archa. Bright, J. Headlam, T. Brocklehurst. J. Heyworth, L. Brockman, E. D. Higgins, G. 0. Brotherton, J. Hindley, C. Brown, IL Hogg, Sir J. W. Brown W. Horsman, E. Bruce, H. A. Howard, 1 - 1•11.,'C. 3urke, Sir T. Hutchins, E. Butt, I. Ilutt, W. Byng, G. 11. C. Ingham, R. Castlerosse, Vie. Jackson, W. Cavendish, C. C. Johnstone, I. Caley, E. S. Keating, B. Challis, T. 'Keating, fr. Chcetham. John Kennedy, T. Clay, Sir W. Et. Kershaw, J. Clifford, Lt.-Col. H• M• King, L. C o bden, R. Kirk, W. coffin, W Lacon, Sir E. . Cogan, IV. IT. F. Laing, S. Collier, R. P. Langton, 11. G... Crauftird, E. H.J. Laslett, W. Crook, J. Layard, A. 11, Crossley, F. Lee, W. Currie, Raikes Lindsay. W Davie, Sir H. R. F. Locke, J. Denison, J. E. Lockhart, A. B. Dent, J. D. Lucas, F. Dering, Sir E. C. Mackie, J. . Divett, E. M'Cann, J. Duff, G. MacGregor, John Duff, J. Maclsfahon, P. Duke, Sir J. McTaggart, Sir 3. Duncan, G. Maguire, J. F. Dmicombe, T. Mangles. R. Dundas, G. Marjoribanks, D. Dunlop, A. Massey, W. Egerton E. Mall, E. Ellice, E. Milligan, R. Ellice, E., Jan. Mills, T. Elliot, J. E. Milner, W. E wart, NV. N ichell, Dr. W. Fergus. J. Mitchell, T. Foley, J. Moffatt, G. Forster, C. Morris, D. Forster J. Mostyn, E. NOES-20S. Newark, VileOnlit Acland, Sir T, Frewen C. • A'Court, C. Galway, vlsoount Adderley, C. Gilpin , Col, . W. North, Lt.-001. J. Annesley, Earl of Gladston e . Oakes, J. A rchdall, M. God dard, A. B. Le e w l d . e o g . C. ate. Ossulston, Lord Arkwrlght, G. Gore, W'. Packs, C. ii. Bailey, Sir J. o ulburn. I Bailey, C. Graham, Sir J. Pakington, Sir J. Bahlock, E. Graham, Lord lilt. Palmer, Robert Baring, H. Granby, Marquis Of Palmer, Roundell Barrington, Vist. Gr:enall, Gilbert Palmerston, Ylseosint Greene. Thomas Barrow, IV. Parker, R. Itateson, Capt. T. Grey, Rt. Hen. Sir G. Peel, Sir R. Beckett, W. Gwyn, HoWel Hale,lßl a a r r c c 001Wuntr;eiteGeolo..r. Peel, F. Bective, Earl Peel, Col. J_., Bennet, Capt. P. Hamilton, (.1. A. Percy, J. Bentinck, Lord IL Hamilton James , U. Phillimore, B. I. Bentinck, G. Rt. 11. n. W. P r o o n n s al on , b m y_ _...... A. ir Heatheote, Sir G. Powlett, u m ' ". Bethell, Sir R. Heathcote, G. Pritchard , .:. B i3 e er rk es e f le rd y. ‘ G. Blair, Lieut -Co l.J.H.Heathcoate, Sir W. T i n" 13 3: .- Bramston, T. W. Heneage, Geo. H. Renton' "`"• rto y . Bruce, Lord E. Heneage, Geo. F. Robe n' Buckley, Gen. 11*". D r ' lord T. Henley, J. Burrell, Sir C. M. Bose—, ir 4 ,,. Herbe S. Burroughes, H. N. Hervey Lord A . , saodarg,.. Hll3,ard, u. C. • sawle. kJ: Cairns, li. Seynter, I f. Campbell, Sir A. I. Hallam, Lord Shirley, Z. Cavendish, G. C. Hudson, G. ' smOtt4 W . W: Cecil, Lord - Hughes. W. • Smith, w. Chaplin, W. • Irton. S. .y Smith, Abel Chelsea, Viscount Johnstone. c , . x ''• Somerset, Capt. Z .. FrO Sir w • Christopher, Robt A. Jo..— ' ca m. T. Sotheron T. Clinton, Lord R. R. F. 30110 0 •_. ... Spooner:R. Clive, It. gendaa, ''' .... K n sephball, w • Stafford,*.A. Cobbold, J. C. Knightlen R. Stanhope. :- Cocks, T. 8.,..,_ ~, w. Kno x, W. S. Startle, Le o.* Codrington. 0 " ''' Langton. W. H. G. Sutton. J. Coles. LI. B. C o lvile. C. R. Law l e y, F. C. Thosiger. Sir. irs 11 C o mpton, .0. Lascelles, E. Tolor,Lt.-Col_. T. Legh, G. C. Thornhill. W. CoviPer• Cr ' Lenaox, Lord A. F. Tollomache,.T. Cubitt. W. Liddell, 11. G. Tadway. R. DELVIs . Liddell, H. T. Tyler, Sir G. Dcede on, s W..; „ Denison, E. p• B . Lisburne, Earl Lindsay Lt.-Cel. 3. vT.L ar, e s l i l t , t Bir t 3 o . ; I Lockhart, W. Vernon, G. Drumlandg, Vie. Lovaine, Lord Villiers, F. Disraeli, a j el . l. sv it . t. Hon. id vf Duckworth, Sir J. T. Lowther. Capt. U. Vyse, Capt. it; Duncombe, Hon. n. Luce T. Waddington, If. Dinioombe, Hon.W.E* Macartney, G. Walcott, Rear. ML Du Pre, C. MacGregor Jas. Walpole, B. East, Sir J. Maddock, Sir T. H. West, F. Egerton, Sir P. Manus, R. Whitmore, 11. • Egerton, W. Mandeville, Viscount Wi g ram, Lortnl T. Elmley, Via. Manners, Lord G. Willoughby, Sir IL: Emlyn, Via. March, Earl of Wood, Sir 0. • Evelyn, W. Wasterman,J. Woodd, B. Farnham, E. Maltase% Col. T. Wortley, J. S:•. ; Ferrer, J. Maui, Sir H. Wy n n, CaPt . Ll 4 Feilden, M. Miles, W. wynne, - W. FCUOWC3, E. Montgomery, Sir G. York4l.-r!' • Ferguson. Sir B. Morgan. 0.. Yotwir, Kr I. „.. Filmer, Sir E. Mowbray, J. l Fitzgerald, W. Mullins. :. Floyer, J. Mundy, W. i Forbes, W. Napier, 3. ' Traialill Cji Itaftlia- OM _ _,, _ _ _ Muntz, Itturrough.j. Norreys, Lord Norreys, Sir D. North, F O'Brien, Sir T. O'Brien, C. O'Connell, J. Oliveira, B. ()Way, A. Pechell, Sir G. Pellatt, A. Perry, Sir E. Peto, S. Phi illmore, 3. a. Philip, T. Pilkington, J. Pinney, W. Pollard-Urgtahatt Potter, R. Price, W. Ramsden, Sir J. Ricardo, J. Ricardo, 0. Rich, H. Robartes, T. Roebuck, J. Russell, F. C. Schoictleld, Scobell, Capt. (1. Scully, F. Scully. ir Seymour, Lord Seymour, Seymour. W. Shufto, It. Serjt. W. Sheridan, R.. Smith, J. A. Smith, J. B. Smith, M. Smith, R. Strickland, Sir a: Strati, E. Stuart, Lord D. Tancred, H, Thicknesee, K. Thompeon, G. Thornely, T Trail], G. Uxbridge, Earl Vane, Lord H. Vivian, J. H. Vivian, H. H. Walmsley, Sir d. Whitbread, B. Wickham, H. Wilkinson, IT. Willcox, B. Williams, W. Wise, A. Wyvill, M. TELLES!. rierrood, J. xtanatrd, A. ILLLus: taytar,'w. ital Moe ailk% ° t Ore : jr3 Ira thg thg ths the ne ,certa► o iy 6 ly 1 6 [le 16 ne 16 ly ne Re $0 ae 16 le 16 ients , fi ler, ears ' )ac1;0