The Sun. — London, England, 1863-06-16 00:00:00

rAPERIAL PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF LORDS--Last 2 v e n i ng , The Loprd Chancellor took his 5e!..4 at the usual hour. PRIVATE — BUSINESS. Finc - h Hattor's Estat"... bill was road a second time. TIIIRD READINGS, Tb,t ) worth Staffordshire Railway (Additional Powers) . th‘g, Exeter Gaol bills were read a third time and petisv.d. _ _ THE CASE OF MR. BISHOP. The Marquis of NORMANBY said he had given notice ilaat he would ask for the production of a despatch made by Sir James Hudson on the 25th of February, which was quoted by his noble friend (Earl Russell) as ccntaining the assurance on the part of the Piedmontese Cabinet that Mr. Bishop wa - ald be liberated. He understood when he gave notice that the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs would have no objection to produce the despatch. Earl RUSSELL said he was about to present to the house, by command of her Majesty, extracts from the despatch referred to by the noble marquis. The promise of pardon to Mr. Bishop by the Italian Government was to be carried into effect on the first favourable opportunity, and that promise was, as soon as brigandage was sup pressed and the state of the country would permit. He had seen a report in the newspaper 3, but he had no positive information on the point, that the ex-King of Naples was about to quit Roma, and if that was so he had no doubt it would go a great way to put down brigandage. "With respect to the health of Mr. Bishop, General Mar mora had sent a medical gentleman to see Mr. Bishop, and he had reported that that gentleman's health would not suffer provided he was not subjected to any severe labour. That opinion had been sent to Turin, and he believed that no fears need be entertained as to the treatment Mr. Bishop would receive. THE BRAZILS. The Earl of MALMESBURY gave notice that on Fri day next, in calling attention to our relations with the Brazils, he should move for copies of any papers showing on what grounds the Government of the Brazils resisted the claims for £3,200 compensation. THE WAR IN AMERICA. The Marquis of CLANRICARDE moved for copies of any report that may have been received from the Admiral commanding her Majesty's squadron on the North Ameri can and West India station concerning the protection from seizur e or visitation afforded to British merchantmen by the Ariadne and other of her Majesty's ships or gunboats or otherwise, and asked what had been the result of the remonstrances made to the United States Government by her Majesty's Minister against the seizure of certain British vessels. He dwelt with particular emphasis on the recent condemnation of the Adele as contrary to all principles of international law, and considered it was the duty of the Government to demand her restoration. The noble marquis contended the country ought to afford adequate protection to her commercial marine, and denounced the seizure of vessels bound to Matamoras and Nassau, as a means of monopolising the trade to the first mentioned place for the benefit of New York shippers, a state of things which ought not to be recognised. Earl RUSSELL said that his noble friend had given them a lecture on international law, in which he had not quoted a single dictum of an American judge in support of statements which he had made entirely out of his own head. As to the assertion of his noble friend that the captain of an American man-of-war was bound to give up a vessel which he had seized because the reasons assigned for seizing her were incomplete, he (E'arl Russell) would not go so far; neither would he say thi d contrary. But if the ship were taken before a prize court, and, upon examination of her cargo, goods were - found in her sufficient to condemn her, he (Earl Russell) would say that she might be condemned. His noble friend said that vessels should be taken in the act of attempting to break the blockade, and not on the open sea; but he (Earl Russell) said that it was not necessary the stLip should be taken in the very attempt to break the blockade. If she were taken with contraband of war in the neighbourhood of the blockaded place she might be con demned. His noble friend said that the object of the Ameri can Government was to vex eur commerce and embarrass our legal trade. Bat in another part he told them of the successful breaches of blockade effected by British vessels. The two things did not go well together. For his (Earl Russell's) own part, he was not inclined to attribute to the American Government an hostile attention. But he had thought it necessary to send instructions to Lord Lyons to state to the American Government that such a feeling was entertained in this country. He had no special information to give his noble friend ; but he could not agree in his 'Munro doctrine as to the right of blockade of a coast. We had blockaded the coast of France from Brest to Dunquerque, and we had blockaded 2,000 miles of the American coast, and we would still hold the right to do so if we were at war again with America He had taken the opinion of the law officers of the Crown upon the construc tion of the treaty of Paris, and they held that under it the blockade of the Confederate coast was consistent. It might not be well to be too ready to resent an imaginary affront ; but the noble lord might rely upon it that he would not be satisfied with any decision that was not based upon justice. The Duke of SOMERSET said that the admiral on the station (Admiral Milne) informed him that his officers bore testimony to the uniform courtesy which they had ex perienced from the officers of Admiral Wilkes's squadron. Those papers to which there was no objection would be laid upon the table. PRISONS MINISTERS BILL. The house went into committee on this bill. Lord LYVEDEN moved an amendment to clause 3, snaking the appointment of additional ministers to prisons compulsory instead of permissive. After some discussion the amendment was negatived, and the clause was agreed to. The bill then went through committee. SALMON FISHERIES (SCOTLAND) BILL. This bill went through committee. THE CASE OF SERGEANT-MAJOR LILLEY. The Earl of SHAFTESBURY &shed the Secretary of War whether it was the intention of the Government to in stitute any further inquiry into the case of Lieutenant- Colonel Crawley and Sergeant-Major Lilley. It was not his intention to offer any observations upon the case at present. He had no official information. But, right or wrong as the rumours regarding it might be, he should say that so dreadful a picture as the case to which he alluded presented had never yet been brought before the British public. Everything which had taken place re garding it as yet had been most nnsatisfasiory, and it was of the very highest importance to the character of the country and to the estimation in which it was held by foreign nations that the case should be properly investi gated. He knew of nothing which had more deeply moved the people of England. They were most anxious that the case should be probed to the bottom. He should therefore at present simply ask the question of which he had given notice. The Duke of CAMBRIDGE—Before my noble friend the Secretary of State for W ar re pli es to the question put by the noble earl, I think your lordships will permit me to observations, not in order that I may make one or two not in reference to the circumstances connected with the co urt martial upon the late Paymaster Smale, nor with re ference to anything that may occur hereafter, should it be found necessary to have a court-martial on Lieut.- Colonel Crawley ; but so much has been said with respect to the position I fill, and the line I have taken with regard to this melancholy proceeding, that it is right your lordships and the country should know the exact relative position in which I, filling the high position which I have the honour to fill, stand with reference to the commander-in-chief in India, and, in short, how I stand in reference to the whole matter. Probably it is not known to your lordships that the conduot of the discipline of the army in India rests entirely with the commander-in-chief in India, and that, so far as my supervision extends, it is merely in the position of a referee in a last appeal. But so seldom is that appeal exercised, that I believe no instances, or at least some very remote in stances, are on record in which any interference on the part of the Commander-in-Chief in England has been made with court-martials in India. To such an extent does this go, that wherever the Commander-in-Chief submits to her Ma jesty the name of any officer who has been tried by court t.at in England and cashiered, though the actual cashier tanakgedoes not take place until the Queen's pleasure has been and .4, ho tla re e f fia erer tofth e commander-in-chief in India is absolute ',light say then , :s t made to her Majesty at all. The noble earl plain myself short j take notice of the affairs at all ? I will ex- Commander f No doubt there is a last appeal to the ing is this—when ,L e in England, and the course of proceed circumstance is reporZt-tmartial takes place in India the :rtdhe Commander-in-Chief at home as have taken place, i n T el , that he may know how to, act in such proceedings. the Judge Advocate of the court-martial itself is transmitted to L Advo -General in cats md -- England, and he forwards it to of looking Chief, that he may have an opportunity ings and return it as a record to the Judge-Ad at the proceed ral. W hen these proceedings came to m r li-Aodvocae Gene confess that, like the noble earl opposite, ivfelledge I must something very peculiar and something most felttthere was singular in them. Tt struck me as so remarkable, that I thought itrtght that the course adopted should, to a great extent, be re viewed by the Commander-in -Chief at home, and his opin ion taken upon it. Having arrived at that conclusion, how was I to act ? .Vas I to remove the officer chiefly implicated in the charge, or not ? In reviewing this case, I find that it is certainly in evidence that an unfortunate affair has occur red ; but, at the same time, I must say frankly that my in formation on the subject is not perfect. t the time my me dum was made, I was not in posseAssion of all the facts Moran of the case. There was much left behind which I trust will in time be elicited, and therefore I abstained from expres sing any decided or positive opinion on the subject. But I stated very clearly, that unless I was satisfied on various points on which I had conside rable doubt, I shou ld abstain from the extreme course of removing the commanding offi cer from the command of his regiment. It has been said that the reason why no action was taken was that two emi nent men were concerned in the transaction. Of course I allude to Sir H. Rose and Sir W. Mansfield. There is no doubt that those two eminent and distinguished officers were e w o . ncern we ed re in the transaction, and the question that arose they concerned in each a manner as that I was n to take action with regard to them ? 1 most poi- Lively and most conscientiously belie ';‘e that those two dis tinguished officers have h! . .,;_ t e very right; but that the desire to do what was committed a very serious error of judg ment. T --.. l ;ett is my conviction; and I believe that this will erdatually be found to be the case. But even to the case of the irregularity of the imprisonment, considerable import ance is attached. That irregularity was not known to me when my memorandum was written. It is only recently that that has come to my knowledge, and of course it was impossible for me to decide in the case when I really and truly did not know the circumstances. I cannot believe there can be any personal feeling in this matter with regard to two such distinguished men—men not merely of high military but private character in the various positions which they had filled. Considering their positions and re putations, I thought that if they had erred it was only in judgment, and certainly not out of the desire to do any act of injustice, cruelty, or wrong. That consideration un doubtedly had weight with me, and I appeal to your lord ships whether it ought not to have had weight with me. (Hear, hear.) Would any official have been justified in coming to a rash conclusion in so very delicate a position ? The result of this, I trust, will be to prove that, in both cases, I have not acted so unadvisedly as I am accused of having done. For what occurred ? Why, at a very recent period, circumstances have come to my knowledge that render it necessary we should bring Lieutenant-Colonel Crawley to court-martial. lam not going to enter into the case which is pending a judicial trial; but the circumstances to which I allude have only come to my knowledge quite recently. Within a few days I have been placed in a position to advise that that trial should take place on the merits of the case. A great deal of time has elapsed since the circumstances of the case first occurred. I may be asked why so much delay has occurred. I answer that the whole affair occurred in India—it takes three months to communicate with India and get back a reply. Hardly a single letter has been written upon this subject that has not required another question on the answer and a fresh delay for another reply, with another delay of three months. The result is that a longer period has been suffered to elapse than I could wish or your lord ships expect. A still further delay must oecur on this ac count. Sir William Mansfield, under whom the regiment is serving, is stationed in Bombay. But the command of all the troops in India is vested in the commander-in-chief, who is stationed in Bengal. The consequence is that every ques tion of this description goes officially from Bombay to Ben gal before it can come to us. This adds to the delay. I have felt bound to point out this, in order to show that what has been done has not been done with a view to shield or screen any one, but with a strict and earnest desire to do justice to all—not alone to do justice to the general feeling of distress at the painful circumstances which have occurred, and which are most natural, but to do justice to those who have been implicated, and to whom I am sure your lordships would wish to give every possible opportunity of defending and justifying themselves, if it be possible for them to do so. That is the only feeling I have ; and as for saying there has been any pressure put upon me, of course I spurn the idea. But it does happen that the question was never discussed by me with a single individual, except in the most official manner, and then only with one on whom I was able to rely for advice and information, and a sound and just and safe conclusion. (Hear.) The Earl DE GREY and RIPON observed that the speech of the royal duke relieved him of the necessity of saying more than a few words on the subject. In regard to the court-martial en Lieut.-Col. Crawley, the precise nature of those charges was now under the consideration of the proper authorities, and it would be improper for him to express any opinion upon the subject. Every step would be taken to ensure that the inquiry should be conducted in the most open manner, and with perfect fairness to all parties concerned. The Earl of SHAFTESBURY hoped the inquiry would take place in England, and not be transferred to India, where in fact it had already been prejudged by the allega tion that Sergeant-Major Lilley's death was the result of habitual intoxication. The Earl of MALMESBUEY said that he had that day seen a letter from Sir Hugh Rose, stating that his assertion to the effect mentioned was grounded on the statement of the surgeon of the quantity of spirits supplied to Sergeant- Major Lilley while under arrest. The subject was then allowed to drop. The Vaccination (Ireland) Bill was read a third time and passed. The Bleaching and Dyeing (Ireland) Bill was read a second time. The Redemption of Rents (Ireland) Bill was considered as amended, and agreed to. DUCHY OF CORNWALL MANAGEMENT BILL. This bill was read a third time and passed. Their lordships then adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS—Last Evening. The SPEAKER took the chair at the usual hour. The following bills were read a second time :—Lands Im provement Company—London (City) Traffic Regulation— Sligo and Ballaghaderreen Junction Railway—Meties Estate. The following bills were read a third time :—Birming ham and Sutton Coldfield Extension Railway—Devon Valley Railway—Haddingtonahire Roads—London end North Western Railway (new branch lines)—Tendring Hundred Railway—and Wexford Free Bridge. The following bills were considered and ordered to be read a third time :—Athenry and Ennis Junction Railway (Extension of Time), Bishops Waltham Railway, Bonnelli's Electric Telegraph Company, Galway Water, Kettering and Thrapstone Railway, London and North Western Railway (additional powers), Midland Railway (Bristol line), Mistley, Thorpe, and Walton Railway, and North British Railway (Wansbeck Railway, &c,) PETITIONS. By Mr. WA.LPOLE, from the University of Cambridge, under its corporate seal, praying that no alteration might be made in the Uniformity Act ; and by Mr. AYnTON, from Volunteers, Tower Hamlets, against certain clauses in the Volunteers Bill. THE RECENT COURT MARTIAL AT MHO W. Mr. CONINGHAM gave notice that on an early day, ongoing into committee, he should call attention to the re cent court-martial on Mr. Swale, and move a resolution thereon. THE COTTON DISTRICTS.—UNEMPLOYED OPERATIVES. Mr. FERRAND gave notice that he should to-morrow ask the First Lord of the Treasury whether, looking at the distress now suffered by the artizans, he did not deem it expedient to devote a morning sitting to the subject. NEW TELEGRAPHIC LINE TO NORTH AMERICA. Mr. CAVE asked the Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs whether her Majesty's Government had received information respecting an international conference, which, according to the Monzteur, had been opened in Paris, for the purpose of examining into the project of a telegraphic line from Europe to North America, via Brazil, and the West Indies, and whether any steps had been taken for the representation of this country at such conference ? Mr. LAYARD replied it was quite true that there had been such a conference. Proposals had been made to the British Government to take part in it; but the Treasury, looking at the engagements into whieh it had entered, had not deemed it advisable to accede to the proposal. JAPAN. Mr. LIDDELL asked the Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what was the precise nature of the demands made by her Majesty's Government upon the Government of Japan, in the shape of reparation for outrages committed upon British subjects in that country ; and, whether there would be any objection to state what instructions had been sent to the British admiral on the station as to the steps to be taken in the event of the Tycoon's refusal to comply with those demands. Mr. LAYARD replied that some months ago a mur derous attack was made on a British subject riding on a public) road, open by treaty to British residents. A Mr. Richardson was killed, two other gentlemen were seriously wounded, and a lady narrowly escaped, almost by a miracle, with her life. An apology had been de manded, and the payment of £lOO,OOO as a penalty. (Hear, hear, hear.) It appeared that the parties who committed the outrage consisted of a band of persons with whom were asspciated a native prince and his father. A demand had been made that the guilty parties should be tried, and if found guilty, executed. (Hear.) £25,0W had also been demanded for the family of the victims of this outrageous assault. In June last year two marines were murdered, who were guarding the British legation, and £lO,OOO had been demanded for their families. He did not know whether the Government of Japan had power to carry out the proposals, but probably the next mail would bring definite intelligence. NEW WRIT—LISBURN. On the motion of Colonel TAYLOR, a new writ was ordered to be issued. THE PURCHASE OF THE GREAT INTERNA- TIONAL EXHIBITION. Lord PALMERSTON appealed to the hon. member for Tipperary to postpone his motion, so that the di scussion on the proposed vote might not be delayed. The hon. and learned member for King's county had put off his motion to that day week. The O'DONOGIIIIE said, after the way the noble lord had treated the question of the Irish Church, he really did not feel disp ose d t o g i ve way i f he had h i s mot i on on the paper for this evening, which was a mistake of the noble lord' a, and for additions and alterations. He—thought London might Must justly, be styled . the commercial capital of the world,. and hence ranked high among the commercial gentres of the world, its great size and the crowding of its buildings tended greatly to impair its architectural beauties. The streets were narrow and its open places few and small. Its public buildings were not many, and differences of opinion prevailed as to their architectural claims to admiration. They had but few of those palaces belonging to individuals who were to be found is many of the small towns of the continent. There were, it was true, Northumberland and Landsdowne houses, and the beautiful club houses in Pall-mall. The noble lord cited the cost of land in London and in each of the large towns, and contended that the land would be sold to the country at a great bargain—namely, £6,000 per acre, whereas, if sold at this moment for building purposes, it would realise not less than £15,000 per acre. (Hear, hear.) The noble lord contrasted the - great cost of buy ing the land in town for the proposed extension of the British Museum, with the small price of the much larger qutntity at Kensington. It was proposed to take the Patent Museum and the National Portrait Gallery to this Exhibition. The 17 acres would cost £120,000, the building £BO,OOO, and the entire altera tion £284,000 making a total of £1,841,000; but it was only proposed to ask for £172,000 in 1863 and 1861, namely, £67,000 for land, £BO,OOO for the building, and £25,000 for the repairs and extensions. A dome was a very handsome thing. (Laughter.) Every one admired the domes of St. Paul's and St. Peter's. The present domes would be constructed more solidly after the style of the generally admired dome of the British Mu seum. The Government did not propose to remove the National Gallery; that, as yet, was a moot question. The noble lord calculated that the nation would be greatly advantaged by the purchase, and concluded by placing the first resolution in the hands of Mr. Massey—namely, £67,000 for the purchase of the land in the present and next year. Mr. GREGORY rose to oppose the bill. He objected to the removal of the collections to so great a distance, and the drawing all our institutions into one focus. He con demned the bargain in strong language, contending that the estimates of the Government were fallacious, and, upon the faith of counter-estimates, that the supposed cheap bargain would involve the country in enormous expense. Why did not the Commissioners, he asked, give up all the land ? Beaause they had involved themselves, or rather the public money, in a private undertaking, the Horticultural Gardens. He asked for more information, for plans and specifications, before the house committed itself to the proposal, and im ploring the house not to make this purchase, he moved the rejection of the vote. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said before going to a division there were one or two points in the hon. gentleman's speech to which he wished to refer. He thought it a very great error to apply the terms " falsehood and job bery" to acts of gentlemen whose private reputation stood high before the public, and was of more value to them than any sum of money they were likely to get for their ser vices. He appealed to the house to defend the characters of gentlemen who had no means of defending themselves from that indiscriminate censure. The hon. gentleman spoke of his (Mr. Gladstone's) having proposed to purchase the building for £700,000. He had made no such proposal. The proposal was to purchase five acres of land for about £50,000, and the maximum for building was about £400,000 to £450,000. The truth was they were always met by the hon. gentleman and his friends at every step with the sug gestion that they were making some scarcely honest state ment to the house, which was afterwards to be doubled or trebled. They must, however, go on as they had done, and present estimates they knew could be relied upon, or they must go upon a very loose system of making doubtful esti mates. As for there being £130,000 already in existence and available for a Patent Office, or rather a Patent Mu seum, he knew of no such sum, and hoped the bon. gentle man was prepared to guarantee his statement. The Govern ment had the highest opinion of Mr. Hunt's estimates, and intended to abide by them. With respect to the number of visitors at South Kensington, and its general success, the number of visitors to the British Museum in 1862 was 895,000, and to the South Kensington Museum 1,241,000. (" Go back.") In 1860 the numbers were, to the South Kensington, 604,000, and to the British Museum 641,000; but at that time the South Kensington Museum was a com paratively new institution. His honourable friend put the case before the committee as one of economy, and said that a slight extension of the British Museum was all that was wanted. But, in support of this view, his honourable friend brought forward an irresponsible opinion against the opinion of those whose duty it was, at the express desire of the Government, to make a responsible examination of the question. His hon. friend said they were going to adopt the monstrous scheme of Professor Owen. They were not proceeding upon the monstrous scheme of Professor Owen; nor upon his re duced estimate of five acres instead of eight as originally proposed—but, by taking three acres for the accommoda tion of the natural history collections, the Government fully believed that by the scheme now before the committee a saving of £300,000 or £400,000 would be effected. Was he to understand his hon. friend as saying that a space of three acres was an irrational or monstrous space for the accom modation of the natural history of this country ? If his hon. friend did not admit this, the ground was completely cut from his feet ; for when his noble friend said they were purchasing for half a million what could not be got else where for a million, that proposition included the purchas ing of three acres for the natural history collection. He had got before him an illustration of what would be required for the purpose of natural history. He presumed that Lon don and England would require as much space for the pur pose as Massachusetts. Well. taking that to be so, let him state a few facts. The people of Massachusetts had built in the neighbourhood of Boston, United States, a museum for their natural history collection. The building consisted o f three stories, and covered two acres, which would be equal in space to a building of two stories covering three acres. That:institution of Massachusetts had been only open two years, and he would quote from a letter of Professor Agas six, whose name was better known to fame than that men tioned by his hon. friend, to show that, so far from such an extent of accommodation being irrational or monstrous, it was quite inadequate. In this letter Professor Agassiz, in speaking of a building which had been only two years opened, says—" Oar building is overflowing. It will be ne cessary for us to extend our structure within the next two years in order not to check our progress." Under these cir cumstances, what were they to do ? Were they to purchase five acres near the British Museum for the purpose of obtaining additional accommodation, and expend £400,000 or £500,000 upon the scheme, and a scheme, too, that would render ne cessary the opening of a new street into Holborn ? And yet this was the plan which his hon. friend had not only the courage, but also the conviction that he was holding out to the committee a purpose of economy. (Hear.) The wants of the public had been stated by his noble friend ; but be fore he sat down he would notice one or two points. His hon, friend said the estimates were fallacious ; all he could say was that they were prepared with greater care than those which had been placed on the other side. Was it an exaggerated estimate to build a National Patent Museum for £lOO,OOO, or a National Portrait Gallery for £25,000 ? They were anxious to avoid all exaggeration, and therefore they only put down what they believed would be the pro. bable maximum cost, and the vote proposed now was framed in accordance with that vote ; and his noble friend had shown that if they were to take the estimate of responsible instead of irresponsible persons, there would be a saving of £200,000 or £400,000. (Cheers.) With regard to the soli dity of the building, that was a technical point upon which he would not detain the committee. (Ironical cheers and laughter.) It would be quite impossible for him to give an adequate explanation upon the point, and he preferred to take the opinions of the responsible persons the Govern ment had consulted. (Hear, hear) Bat there was a do cument in existence, signed by two gentlemen of reputa tion, Mr. Baker and Mr. Wm. Fairbairn. Speaking of the solidity of the building as constructed for the purposes of last year—(hear and laughter)—not entering into the ques tion of the durability of the flooring or the roof—(laughter) —but with respect to the walls and the general solidity of the building, the effect of the document was that the build ing had been subjected to the severest testing, and that it had proved upon all points to be more than equal to any trial of solidity that it could be called on to bear. (Hear.) The question was, whether they were to give £BO,OOO for the building at South Kensington Museuin,and all the Government had to do was to show that this was a wise and profitable arrangement for the public. But that was not the question now before the committee. (Hear, hear.) The real question before the committee had been entirely blinked by his hon. friend. His hon. friend had not said a word about that question. His hon, friend had entirely blinked and evaded the practical question, whether it was necessary for the Government, in the interest of the public, to endeavour to obtain possession of the 17 acres at South Kensington. (Ministerial cheers.) He believed the Patent Museum at Washington covered a space of 11 acres. (Great laughter.) Well, he got the fact that 8 acres of ground would be necessary for a National Patent Museum and a National Portrait Gallery. He would take his stand only upon these two cases, which had been established upon data which could not be shaken; and he would ask his hon. friend, as the worshipper of economy, if he was prepared to pay £-100,000 for 8 acres of ground for these two national and important purposes, when they could get 8 acres of land for £L:0,000 at South Kensington, with the buildings upon it. (Cheers.) That was the issue the committee had to decide, and he did not think, however sincere might be the professions of economy on the part of his hon. friend, that he would persuade the committee that it was economical to refuse to purchase land upon the cheap terms they were getting it at South Kensington. There was considerable responsibility attaching to members of that house, For a long time it had been observed that every possible evil, vacillation, uncertainty, delay, expense, and many others, a statement o f ht d fhe misapprehension g o h f the to part ies into the been carefully peculiar re.y a o s o p n e s c i t a s er o c f d t , h au e e d as a e l.4 . The o tbe u Yr.SS stated that he had given way on x understanding that he should have an oppor- M e r. p ß re E ss Ny 4 t t h u e nity of bringing on sa th ih s e ubject of Poland this day week. ght was a miserable dupe with re splecitr.to°hSills °rnitotl4ioEn—(lan —for he bad put it off under the impression that ho should have Friday week, which it appeared had been devoted to another h on. member. ITER replied The subject then dr o pp e d . Theln reply c iu t o N Sir .E L I L . l o V it t L o r.. f o v t h o e u Iv x , CIIE that the commissioners held the 12 acres of land free an d intact at South Kensington. The land cot When the partnership between the commissioners and Government ceased, this money ad v a nced by the Gove te rn h meat was repaid—Ll2o,ooo in cash and £61,000 in land. On the motion of Lord PALMERSTON, the house.en went into committee. Lord PALMERSTON then brought forwari the pro. ~ ,Id r ascd eiltintatg for the rurchan of the land uilding, TRE SUN, I.9NDON, TUESDAY ..gYENING, JUNE: 16, 1863. necessity of providing for the wants of the country ; and he believed that these wants could be more cheaply provided for by purchasing the land at Kensington than by the scheme of his lion. friend, which was presented to them under the name of economy. (Cheers.) Sir J. PAKINGTON (who rose amid loud cries of "Divide," and calls for " Osborne") said he would not detain the committee long, but he did not wish the com mittee should come to a vote of this kind under a misappre hension. What he desired to know was whether, under the first vote for lands and buildings, the Exhibition build ing was included. (Cries of "Divide.") The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said there were many points which of course had not been answered, but with regard to the buildings mentioned they were chiefly some refreshment-rooms which had been established last year, and which overlooked the Horticultural Gardens. He thought the best thing to do was to treat the building as non-existent—(a laugh)—and take the land at the price put upon it by the commissioners. Mr. AYRT ON said the document on the table did not state that they were to buy the land pure and simple, but for the purpose of devoting it to science and art. (Hear, hear.) The CHANCELLOB , of the EXCHEQUER replied that the land was not to be purchased with the view to put it up for sale the day following; but for the purpose of appropriating it to such objects in connection with science and art as Parliament might think fit. Lord ELCHO (who rose amid loud and general cries "Divide") said that the object he had in putting his amendment was to enable the committee to come to a decision upon the question of the land independent of the building. He would impress upon the committee the im portance of not letting the present opportunity pass. (" Divide.") The question was not lightly to be dealt with. For many years they had been in a state of chronic congestion, and he trusted the near approach of the dinner-hour would not induce hon. members to treat this case lightly. (Cries of " Divide.") The noble lord concluded by moving the chairman report progress. The CHAIRMAN having put the question, Viscount PALMERSTON said he hoped they would make progress before they reported progress. (A laugh.) Let them make up their minds to do something. He hoped the committee would not agree to the motion; there would be no objection when they came to the next vote, if the house wished for further information, to postpone it; but let them now decide upon the first vote. (Cheers.) Mr. OSBORNE said it would require the tongue of De mosthenes, and the ability of the noble lord, to deal with the question, on account of the slovenly way it was brought be fore them. The noble lord had himself so mixed up the question of the land and the large shed together, that it be came impossible for any gentleman to discuss the question upon one point without the other. He had been much struck with the speech of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, for he had given the go-by to Capt. Fowke's enormities. (Laugh ter and cheers.) The hon. member then entered into some criticisms upon portions of the estimates and the plans for the new museums and galleries in connection with science and art ; and concluded by saying that the words might be applied to the present vote which had once been addressed to the statue of Liberty :—" 0 Art, what atrocities have been committed in thy name P . Sir H. WILLOUGHBY, (whose rising called forth a very tempest of derisive laughter) said he rose merely upon a point of form. (Renewed laughter.) He wished to ask if the chairman had observed the irregular course of proceed ing in the manner the present estimates were laid upon the table. Mr. MASSEY replied that the manner in which her Ma jesty's Government had submitted the present estimates was regular in point of form. (Cheers.) The motion for reporting progress was then negatived, and the committee divided upon the first vote of £67,000. Fur the vote Against it Majority -132 (Cheers.) Lord PALMERSTON then postponed the consideration of the next vote to Thursday week. (Cries of " No, no.") Mr. MALINS said the committee were prepared to go on with the next vote. Mr. OSBORNE protested against what had been said by the hon. and learned gentleman. Let the question be post poned. While the house was in a state of excitement and uncer tainty the Chairman said the nexc, vote was £853 to com plete the salaries of commissioners of education in Ireland. The vote was agreed to; but Mr. O'REILLY protested against a vote being put at a time when the noise of the house was so great that it could not be heard. Mr. WALPOLE, in order to convenience the hon. mem ber for the Tower Hamlets, postponed the statement on the vote relating to the British Museum till Thursday week. The sum of £3,500 for the London University was agreed to. The sum of L 1,559 for the Scotch Universities was agreed to. On the vote of '£1,396 for the Queen's University, Ireland, Mr. V. SCULLY declared that the authors of the system of mixed education in Ireland were influenced by a spirit of proselytism. The noble lord at the head of the Government refused to open the Botanical Gardens in Edinburgh on the Sunday, although his personal opinions were in favour of the proposal, because he knew how to yield to the bigoted in fluences which were so powerful in Scotland; but he could make no concession to popular feeling in Irelani, nor did he know how to conciliate the support of the Irish members. Mr. P. DAWSON defied the hon. and learned gentleman to point to a single case of proselytism which had resulted from the establishment of the Queen's Colleges. The O'CONOR DON said if they did not lead to prosely tism, they led to indifferentism. Major O'REILLY pointed out that the system of educa tion established in Ireland was founded upon a directly op posite principle to that established in England. - Mr. F. POWELL thought the time had come when the system of education in Ireland should be tested as in Eng land, by results. After some observations from Mr. BLAKE and Mr. HENNESSY, Sir It. PEEL defended the vote, and urged that a mixed education had been established in Ireland by Act of Parlia ment, and he could not of his own motion change it. The vote was agreed to. On the vote of £3,800 for the Queen's College, Ireland, Mr, V. SCULLY moved that the vote be reduced by £l,BOO. After some discussion, the amendment was negatived and the vote agreed to, A vote of £5OO for expenses connected with the National Gallery of Ireland was agreed to. Upon the vote of £1,500 for salaries of theological pro fessors in the College of Belfast, Mr. HADFIEL D moved the reduction of the vote by £1,050. After some discussion, the committee divided For the reduction of the vote 25 Against it Majority The vote was then agreed to. The CHAIRMAN said the question was, that he was now to report the resolutions to the house. Mr. CONINGHAM hoped the Chairman would not do so, but would proceed to the vote on the National Gallery, for which he had been waiting all the evening. Other hon. members having concurred in the views of Mr. Coningham. The CHAIRMAN again put the question. No member of the Government having risen, a division was taken on the motion that the Chairman report the re solutions. For reporting the resolutions Against ~.. Majority —BB The Chairman then left the chair, and the house resumed, SUPPLY. Mr. MASSEY brought up the supply. On the resolution relating to education, Sir S. NORTHCOTE called attention to the manner in which school managers were likely to be affected by the re vised code, and entered into the history of the compromise which the Government made with the house, contrasting the former position of school managers with that they now held. He complained that a new code of instructions had been sent to the various inspectors all over the country, which appeared to depart from the terms of the agreement made between the Government and that house. Sir J. PAKINGTON complained that while it had been laid down by the 136th article of the code that grants would be made to endowed schools where the endowment did not exceed 30s per scholar per annum, a minuto vas issued in May last that in no case of endowed schools could grants be made. After a few words from Mr. W. E. FORSTER and Mr, PUGH, TION BILL. Mr. LOWE denied that there had been any departure from the arrangement of last year. The article to which the right hon. baronet referred was also in the old code, and was not exempt from revision. The agreement of last year was in regard of certain specified articles, and from these there had been no departure. In conclusion, the right hon. gentleman complained of the number of hypothetical ques tions relative to the interpretation of the 'Minutes of Council which had been put to him, and announced that he would answer no more of them. Sir W. MILES was perfectly astonished at the answer of the right hon. gentleman, and the spirit of non-endurance which it displayed. Mr. HENLEY believed the country would hear the statement of the right hon. gentleman with the deepest alarm. If this new code was to go for nothing, and be altered when the Government pleased, the mistrust at pro sent exi:ting would greatly and rapidly increase. (Hear.) The resolution was then agreed to. On the resolution of £82,826 for science and art, Mr. A. SMITH called attention to the increasing cha • ratter of the vote. lie complained that no satisfactory ex planation was given on a former night, and he moved the reduction of the vote by £lO,OOO. He referred particularly to the sum charged for the offices connected with the Ken sington Museum. Mr. C. BEN f INCK seconded the motion. lie was at a loss . to under s t an d why the Government decline d t o g i ve any information on the subject. Mr. LOWE explained that the increased expenditure was for residences for the accommodation of the different officers at South Kensington, The officers bad not got into pos. session, but when they were in occupation a deduction would be made from their salaries equivalent to the rent. The committee divided. The numbers were — For the amendment Against it Majority .. —l23 The resolution was then agreed to. THE VOLUNTEERS BILL. Upon the order for the third reading of this bill, Mr. COX presented several petitions from volunteer corps praying for a revision of the 21st clause, which gave the power of summary dismissal to commanding officers. Sir R. CLIFTON presented several petitions to the same effect from various corps. Mr. HENNESSY moved that the bill be recommitted, for the purpose of striking out the 20th clause, and insert ing another, making it lawful for the commanding officer to suspend a volunteer from duty for three months, or to assemble a court of inquiry, composed of himself and six members of the corps, a majority of whom might order the volunteer to be suspended or to have his name struck off the muster roll. With regard to the clause he had alluded to, he had reasons for venturing to say that the volunteer body objected to it. The hon. gentleman pro duced a very large bundle of letters he had received from volunteers in different parts of the country, and another bundle from commanding officers, all complaining of the operation of that clause of the bill. The hon. gentleman also quoted the evidence of the Inspector-General of Volun teers, to the effect that the power of summary dismissal ought not to be in the hands of an officer. If that bill were passed, he believed the effect of it would be to destroy the volunteer body altogether, and thus render an increase in the income tax necessary. The power was not only con trary to the common law of the country, but to the War Office regulations. Colonel FANE said he knew there was but ono feeling throughout the county of Oxford, which was in opposition to the bill as it at present stood. Col. DUNNE said the power of dismissal existed already in the militia corps. Col. SYKES said he was of opinion that the power should be retained ; but, to guard against abuse, he would suggest that whenever a man was dismissed he should have his name entered in a book, and the causes of his dismissal. Mr. W. E. FORSTER said the clause appeared to him to be compulsory; in the present War Office regulations it was permissive, and found to work very well. There was such a thing as a court-martial in the army and militia, but, from the constitution of the volunteer force, such a court would be entirely inadmissable. If they did not allow the bill to pass in its present shape, but adopted a clause appointing a compulsory committee of inquiry, then he should say that, in fairness, they ought to relieve com manding cfficus of all responsibility with regard to the discipline of their men, and make the committee respon sible. The great majority of the volunteer force were satis fied with the provisions of the bill, and they were not likely to be led away by allegations about arbitrary rule. (Cheers.) Mr. COX said he differed from the hon. member who spoke last, and begged to express his thanks to the hon. member for King's County for bringing forward this amendment. All that he and those who thought with him asked for the volunteer was the same measure of justice which was granted to every man in the army and militia. He would assure the noble lord at the head of the Govern. ment, and the noble lord the Under-Secretary for War. that before long such a crowd of petitions would come in as would show that either this clause must be given up or there would be an end of the volunteer movement. The hon. member then entered into an explanation with regard to the deductions he had drawn from the evidence of Lord Ranelagh before the commission. He thought the infer ence which he had drawn was a just one, but as the noble lord had written to state that his interpretation was not cor rect, he begged to withdraw the observations he had made. At the same time it was queer that men should give their evidence in such a way that deductions such as he had made could be drawn from it. (Oh, oh.) Mr. 0. GORE said there was not one tittle in the evi dence of Lord Ranelagh from which the hon. member could draw his deductions, and he was sorry to find an hon, mem ber sheltering himself under the shield of his privileges as a member of Parliament to make scandalous and unfounded charges against the noble lord. Sir R. CLIFTON rose to order, and moved that the words be taken down. The SPEAKER said he should have risen himself to say that after the observations made by the hon. member for Finsbury, the words used by the hon. member were not in accordance with the rules of debate ; and he was sure a little reflection would show him that. Mr. 0. GORE said he was sorry if he said anything dis respectful to the house in general. At the same time he thought when a man was not there to defend himself there should be better grounds for the allegations that were made. (Hear, hear.) The SPEAKER hoped the expression of regret on the part of the hon. member would be satisfactory to the house. Mr. CONINGHAM thought the hon. member for Brad ford had endeavoured to explain away a matter that was very arbitrary. Mr. S. FITZGERALD asked the house if they had ever heard a more scant, he would almost say so ungenerous au expression of regret—(hear, hear)—as that which had fallen from the hon. member for Finsbury—(hear, hear)—a charge similar to that made by the hon. gentleman. Mr. COX—I beg your pardon—l made no charge. (Hear, hear, and laughter.) Mr. FITZGERALD—WeII, a statement of the views of Lord Ranelagh made by the hon. member. Mr. COX—I made no statement of the noble lord's views. (Laughter.) What I said was, that some commanding officers appeared to regret that they had not the power of flogging. (Hear, hear.) Mr. FITZGERALD—That was true; but the hon, member afterwards admitted that ho applied the words to Lord Ranelagh, although at the time he must have been aware of the means which the noble lord had taken before a magistrate to obtain a retractation of the imputation, and gross libel. On that investigation the noble lord stated that he had never given any evidence that could justly give rise to such an imputation ; and, furthermore, that it was totally and absolutely contrary to his opinion. (Hear, hear.) Yet, after that denial, the hon. member repeated the charge. Mr. COX—I beg your pardon. (Laughter.) Mr. FITZGERALD—The noble lord then wrote to the hon. member, stating that the inference from his evidence was unjust and unfounded, and thereupon the hon. member had expressed himself as the house had heard. He repeated that no more scant or grudging apology could have fallen from any gentleman. (Hear, hear.) The Marquis of HARTINGTON could not regret the discussion on the bill for the third time, as it afforded the hon. member for Finsbury an opportunity of making some retractation of the aspersions he cast on the noble lord the other night. Mr. COX—I cast no aspersions. (Laughter.) The Marquis of HARTINGTON—AIthough he wished that the retractation had been more free and generous— (hear, hear)—than it had been. (Hear, hear.) The hon. member would lead the house to suppose that it was only since the denial he had received from Lord Ranelagh that he had been aware that what was attributed to that noble lord were not his real sentiments ; but the hon.member must have been aware that not only had Lord Ranelagh denied the imputation, but that he had obtained an apology from those who had spread the calumny. (Hear, hear.) As to the proposal of the hon member for Kiug's County, it was almost the same as that which the house had twice nega tived, and although he respected the opinion of his hon. and gallant friend (Col. Fane), he yet believed that volun teers as a body were in favour of the bill as it stood. (Hear, hear.) Not one of the cases brought before the house in opposition to the bill had been substantiated, and he believed that it would give general satisfaction. (Hear, hear.) It was hurried forward for the purpose of placing on the table the Order in Council which would entitle the corps to a grant this year. Mr. KNIGHTLEY supported the bill, on the ground that it did not alter the existing law. The house divided. The numbers were— For recommittal Against .... • 138 Majority against —lo7 Some amusement was created by Mr. Brand announcing at first the numbers wrong, and giving the victory to the minority. The bill was then read a third time, and passed. REGIMENTAL DEBTS, &c., BILL. This bill was read a second time, and passed. LONDON DIOCESS BILL. This bill was read a second time. PIER AND HARBOUR ORDERS CONFIRMA. The house having gone into committee on this bill, on recommittal, Lord R. GROSVENOR moved that so much of the bill as related to Rhyl Pier, and the provisional order relating thereto, be struck out. After some discussion the amendment was agreed to, and the bill passed through committee. The Militia Pay Bill and the Charitable Uses Bill were read a second time. The Sheep and Cattle (Scotland) Bill, and the Metropolis Turnpike Roads Acts Amendment Bill were considered, as amended, and agreed to. The Trout, &c., Fishing (Scotland) Bill was thrown ow on a division by 37 to 12. The Innkeepers' Liability (No. 1) Bill was read a third ticaa and passed. The house adjourned at 20 minutes past 2 o'clock. [ADVERTISEMENT.]—HoIIoway's Pills.—When formid able fevers and other contagious complaints are prevalent, Holloway's purifying Pills are the best correctives of the system and the surest cleansers of the blood. No one should permit any disordered action to continue when it cun be so easily rectified by these Pills ; even one day's delay may bring bitter cause to rue that slight neglect. There can arise no danger from taking Holloway's medi cine, and no difficulty can occur in administering it to the young and delicate; clear and definite instructions enve lope each box. To feel that the body is out of order is sufficient warranty for taking these Pills, which will pre vent or arrest diseases even when doubtful, complicated, or olnoure. SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. TIMES. —The House of Commons agtded last night, by a majority of two to one, to the purchase of the site of the Exhibition Building. It had been previously agreed that this vote should be first dis posed of, and that a little more time should be al lowed for the more controverted part of the propo sition. The purchase of the site, however, as Mr. Gregory showed himself well aware, commits the house very far. The site can only be used for the promotion of art and science, and, unless any gen tleman can discover new methods for the promo tion of these objects, the site must either lie idle or be used very much as Lord Palmerston and the Chancellor of the Exchequer have proposed. They do not propose to transfer to South Kensington either the National Gallery or the learned bodies now at Burlington-house. They propose to begin by locating in the Exhibition Building the Museum of Patents, now huddled up in one small apartment at the South Kensington Museum, the National Por traits ' now haidly visible, and the Collection of .. N tural History, which has long been bursting its bounds in Great Russell-street. After the evidence. the authorities, and the examples that have been adduced, it can no longer be doubted that these wants must be measured by acres, and that the acres in the heart of the metropolis are too costly to be bestowed upon objects not absolutely requiring that position. With many of our readers, we should be very glad to see all the public collections in stalled in magnificent and eternal edifices, as exten sive as the Cretan Labyrinth and as indestructible as the Pyramids, in Trafalgar-square, or Piccadilly, or the Strand. But everybody knows that we might as well wish the Heavenly Jerusalem to be planted to-morrow in Leicester-square, or the Garden of Eden in Soho. It has been triad and tried, till no body will try it again. A vote is to be asked first for the site, then for the building ; and if the Chan cellor of the Exchequer should ever find the house ready to invest in land at £50,000 or perhaps £lOO,OOO an acre, and to cover it with magnificent edifices, the occasion will only provoke a new war of architects, librarians, sculptors, painters, naturalists, and other men of art and science, proverbially the most irritable of the human species. There is not the remotest chance of the thing being over done in the way that we could wish, and in the way that a great nation ought to do it. We must go to a suburb, and we must house our more bulky and increasing collec tions where we can. If a man has only himself to take care of, he may take a pleasant lodging in Pail-mall or Mayfair ; but if, with a limited income, he has a large family of small children, he must be content with a house in the su b ur b s . That is the question which was settled in the House of Com mons last night. The figures spoke for themselves. Two or three acres even in Bloomsbury, covered with buildin gs in character with the British Museum, will cost as much as 17 acres or more at Brompton. Parliament can only be reckoned on for a certain sum, at the outside, and, as space is indispensable for the purpose, we must get as much as we can for the money within a mile of Hyde-park-corner. In anticipation, however, of the deferred debate upon the purchase of the Exhibition Building, Mr, Gre gory undertook to represent a gentleman who gives us in this way the benefit of his professional advice. Mr. Mallet, who has formerly been employed by Government himself, and who either expects or does not expect to be employed again, has gone over the building, and made himself thoroughly acquainted with its deficiencies. His conclusion is that, except the four walls, there is absolutely nothing there that we should not have to replace with more sub stantial materials and more complete workmanship. When this is the case, he warns us that we do, in fact, only get the four walls for our money ; and, as those four walls have to be stuccoed and orna mented, and even then will be open to criticism, the value received for our money sinks very low indeed in Mr. Mallet's estimation. The argument is that which has been stated elsewhere with an eloquence and wit unfortunately much easier on the negative side of all questions than on the affirmative. It is so much easier to prove a house uninhabitable than habitable, and to prove every human being a fool than the contrary, that we wholly despair of success in this arena. Mr. Mallet, even when chaperoned by Mr. Gregory, reads very flat after the brilliant effusions we have perused elsewhere. While the satirist makes his utter nonsense and absurdity at least amusing, the architect is only savage, abusive, solemn, and stupid. Even were we to grant every word that he says—and we do not grant it— that would still leave wholly untouched the most important reasons for purchasing the building as it stands, and making the best of it. In the first place, besides the four walls, which are ad mitted to be something tor the money, there is the general plan, to which scarcely an exception has been taken. As a mode of utilising a block of 17 acres, it is about as good a plan as could be sug gested. Government proposes to work upon that Iplan. It does not propose at once to raise the whole structure to that scale of solidity by which Mr. Mal let measures it and finds it wanting, but to proceed bit by bit, as space is wanted. It is not necessary to floor the whole building at once, or to warm the whole building at once, or to give the whole half mile of Picture Galleries a fireproof floor at once, or to substitute brick piers for the iron braces on which the " stand-up " now depends all over the building at once, or to complete the fittings all at once, or to substitute planed surfaces for rough all at once. If we begin with half the south Picture Gallery, and three acres for the Patents, and five for Mr. Owen's collection, we shall do enough for the present. The rest of the building may remain in its present state, which, after some very heavy storms of rain last week, is, we may say, perfectly weather-tight. The proposed destination need not touch the nave, which will thus remain available for temporary exhibi tions, for flower shows, for promenade concerts, for Volunteer reviews, for ceremonials, and for many other purposes, which it will be very easy to sneer at, but not so easy to prevent being both popular and useful. The nave may always be kept open, and retained in its present state, bearing the same relation to the adjacent courts and galleries as West minster Hall bears to the Houses of Parliament and the Courts of Law. For this use it will not r,quire any change or much repair for many years. Of course we could wish the situation higher, and the floor more raised above the natural surface, but the situation is, at least, many feet higher than that of the Houses of Parliament or Westminster Abbey. POST.—The political isolation of Russia is becom ing daily more decided. The policy of the Cabinet of Berlin having completely alienated the people of Prussia from the Government of the country, her only ally is a fast breaking reed surely destined to fail beneath the hand that leans upon it. A few more ill-judged acts of friendship on the part of Prussia will place not merely that Power but Rus sia herself in direct antagonism with the rest ot Eu rope. She has therefore nothing to trust to but the diplomacy of her statesmen, and it is not likely that they will neglect the opportunity furnished by the notes about to be addressed to St. Petersburg by the Western Powers and Austria, to prolong the situa tion over as great an interval as possible. The sen sible diminution of the ancient prestige of the em pire, the disorganisation of the army, the wretched condition of the fleet, the exhausted state of the finances, the still incomplete social reorganisation of the country, the precarious position of the nobility, the difficulty of exciting the fanaticism of the pea sants, the absence of any European ally, and, above all, the feeble and undecided character of the Em peror himself, are so many reasons why those who control the destinies of the empire wish for time, and why to gain it they will appear in the first in stance disposed to grant concessions which may delude Europe, and for a moment suspend any manifestations of discontent which may be about to break out in fresh provinces. That they will em ploy this period in en honest endeavour to reconcile what is possible to Russia with what is satisfactory to Poland, is more than we can hope ; but that, while professing to be actuated by liberal and humane sentiments, the Government at St. Peters burg may in reality profit by the occasion to employ measures of even greater severity than they have hitherto done is extremely probable. Our last accounts from St. Petersburg indicate already a ten dency in this direction. We learn upon undoubted authority that, for the third time during the last three months, a discussion has taken place in the Cabinet as to whether it will be wise to leave the Grand Duke Constantine still at Warsaw, or whether it would not be better to recall him imme diately, and at the same time enforce more rigorous measures against the insurrection. Wnile on the one hand it is desirable that no new incentive should be given to foreign sympathy with the Poles, the suppression of the insurrection at all costs is a point of the first importance. It would seem that, this question has been discussed with much warmth, and that opinions were all the more divided on ac count of the animosity and personal jealousy which exists against the Grand Duke in certain quarters, and which would seek to keep him as long as pos sible removed from St. Petersburg. The result of these discussions is reported to have been that, unless some unforeseen eventuality should arise, the present status quo was to be allowed to continue until the autumn; that is to say, until the severe weather and the closing of the navigation should render any active intervention on the part of foreign Powers impossible, while the cold would force the numerous bands of insurgents to leave the forests and seek a shelter more appropriate to the winter season. When that time comes, if the comparatively mild measures employed now have failed to suppress the insurrection, the Imperial Goveranmdeantt will any take advantage of t h e s i x winter months to re , establish its autho rit y at all hazards n L cost ; and as the measures which will then be em. p reflectl ey e d will credit b o n e s a e a m r c e e n y b e o r foie the e tu lm re calculated perialfa t family, it is likely that the Grand Duke Constantine will then be recalled aed replaced by General Berg. Meantime, we cepnot congratulate either his Im perial Higline , s nor General Mouravieff on the last exercise of their authority. The hangie„ of the priest K a t o n w a n k , a a t re lS' a 'a o r t s s a w w h , io a h n d C a r eof certainly L enoron justified by the exigencies of the situation. Count Plater was a leading member of one of the wealthiest and most distinguished noble families in Poland; and although it is true that arms were found concealed on his estate, it is asserted that he was ignoraut of the fact, and innocent of alit complicity with the insurgents. Under any circum stances, he was entitled to a trial and a more honourable death than that of a common malefactor. We should consider that an earl in this country must have taken a very leading part indeed in an insurrectionary movement to justify his being hung without trial in a public market place ; and if these are the comparatively mild measures for which the Russian Government intend to substitute other.A still more stringent, we do not wonder at the Grand Duke having been relieved from the duty of en forcing them, though we are at a loss to conceive in what they are to consist. Meantime the summer is passing away, and while the Great Powers are changing diplomatic notes and making propositions , the numbers of widows and orphans in Poland crying aloud for help are daily increasing- Unless some Power more energetic and cou rageous than the rest steps in, the autumn will close upon a nation's agony, the time for action will be past, and the protraction of negotiations over the next few months will leave Russia with her hands free at the end of them. The result may be the momentary suppression of the movement, but it will not be the extinction of the national sentiment. Throughout every class this feeling has gathered force and vitality just in pro portion as the prestige of Russian power has de clined ; and the experiences of the past year, though bitter and disastrous, have been so far encouraging that they have shown the extent of the patriotism and the moral resources of the people, and the fire which has now blazed with such fury it will need more than a winter's frost to extinguish. If it be the object of the great powers to secure the peace of Europe, they must not be put off by vague pro mises and dilatory pleas on the part of Russia. It is probable that the notes will be sent to St. Peters burg at once, and there can be no reason why we should not get an immediate and decided answer upon the matter of the treve, or armistice, or what ever the interlude may be termed. If the reply of Russia upon this point is unsatisfactory, it will be impossible to let the matter rest at that stage. It may be that Austrian statesmen foresee this con tingency, and are prepared with a new policy in lieu of those propositions which have cost so much discussion, but are of so little practical value. We have already indicated whatin our view that policy should be ; but if the occasion is allowed to slip by, it may be taken advantage of by others, and the peace of Europe may be endangered by the very Powers who most desire to preserve it. HERALD.—The proposal made by the Govern ment to expend £484,000 in the purchase of 17 acres of land in South Kensington, and the completion of the building used for the Great Exhibition of 1862 is one which is sure to elicit a great variety of opi nions, not only from members of the House of Com mons but among persons outside who have at heart the interests of the nation and of the metropolitan city. There is no doubt, we suppose, that a very good bargain has been made when 17 acres of land in a good position, one that at a future day "nay be in the centre of London, are to be had at a price of about £7,000 per acre. In the Oxford-street im provements the land cost £57,000 an acre. In prolonging Coventry-street the price of £119,0 00 an acre was paid. If 17 acres in South Kensington are cheap at £120,000, the International Exhibi - tion building is not dear at £BO,OOO. It would coot much more to cover this space of ground with any kind of shed for any sort of purpose. To this vote of £200,000 we have no objection to make. AV° cannot say the same of the £284,000 which are said to be required for the completion of the Exhibition building. For what is this enormous sum wanted ? The building is to be rendered substantial, the front is to be stuccoed, and the glass domes are to be changed into solid domes of brick covered with lead. Might not the money be much better ex pended in developing into a handsome structure what is now, by common consent, a very ugly building and a great disfigurement to the western part of the metropolis? Why do not the Govern ment take the advice of a committee of architects on this matter ? Captain Fowke may be very skilful in the art of constructing convenient sheds for temporary purposes ; he is not the sort of man whom Augustus would have employed in rebuilding Rome, or Napoleon in beautifying Paris. The building has many patent faults which need to be rectified. The length of the nave is broken and. ' spoiled by the rise of six feet at each end. The domes are squat and ugly, and give heaviness to the ends of the building, leaving the centre weak. Even the contractors, whose business it was not to design but to execute, proposed to erect a large dome in the centre as a plan far preferable to having two smaller ones at the ends. Then the terminal towers at the east and west angles, in nobody knows what style of architecture, might be removed altogether with great advantage. The ends of the transepts, of flat unsightly woodwork, which completely spoil the view from the Horticultural Gardens, should. surely be made into an architectural feature. Let the building stand, by all means, and let it be com pleted, but do not suffer it to remain a damning blot upon the taste of the country, an occasion of scoffing to supercilious visitors from the Continent, If the plan of restoration exhi bited at the building and in the South Ken sington Museum were carried out, we might have a structure of which the nation need not be ashamed. Lord Palmerston may despise architecture, and think it impossible for any building in London to be beautiful. For our part we think that for half a million of money we ought to have a build ing which should be pleasing to the eye at the same time that it satisfied our material requirements. But what is to be done with the building when we have it on our hands? It is quite a mistake to suppose that in retaining this structure we are in any way providing for the enlargement of the British Museum or the transfer of the National Gallery of Paintings. The natural history collection could never be housed under a building roofed with glass. If the great building were given to Professor Owen he would fill it with whales, and then ask for more room. The contents of the National Portrait Gallery may be conveniently housed in the picture galleries of the late Exhibition. Tne Patent Museum, liable to un limited expansion, may perhaps be lodged in the re mainder of the structure, which may be used also on occasions for exhibitions in co b,ta n uhwn n iidlsh e d e ampi t tn i ueo o gbvn n elemiryo w u,s i i t ssol h teidrteon t en h uose e st. D Bhwani e vt p the a o r aint t e.m fair e In thingftr return t f euw S rano c r i e e df n o otcroeinsist u d ln, A hpaeo r l t ln only be completed substantially, it must be ren dered worthy of the nation in an architectural point of view. It must become an ornament, and not re main a disfigurement to London. MULTIPLICATION GF EATS.—Mr. Buckland re" lates that a celebrated rat-catcher told him a little dog his, called Tiny, and under six pounds in weigho killed 2,526 rats, which, at the end of throe years, had they been permitted to live, would have increased to the astound ing number of 1,633,190,200 rats I To-day's telegram is brought to us with lightning speed by magnetic force. The same power, and with the same success, is employed by Mr: Herring in his magnetic brushes. pr. Hassan reports " I regard them as the most perfect brushes hitherto made, as respects their mechanical construction and their magnetical action." They are the remedy for grey hair, neuralgia, rheumatism, &c. N.B.—Counterfeits are being made. Offices, 32, Basinghall-street, London. Births. BowEN.—On the 12th inst., at Queen's-gardens, Hydo park, the wife of Charles Bowen, Esq., of a son. CHADWICK.-0/1 the 14th inst., at New Hall, Warwick shire, the wife of John Do H. Mavesyn Chadwick, of a son. HARRIS.—On the 14th inst ,at Brixton, the wife of Mr. Horatio Harris, of a son. Marriages. . _ _ ---- DOWLING—FLEET.— On the 13th inst., at the Old Church, Brighton, Frank Dowling, Esq., of Addlestone, Surrey, to Isabel, youngest daughter of W. Fleet, Esq , of !, Richmond-terrace, Brighton. GABNETT—SINGLETON.—On the 13th inst., at St. Mark's, Regent's .park, Richard Garnett, Esq , of the British Museum, to Olivia Narney, only daughter of Edward Singleton, Esq., of co. Clare, Ireland. Deaths. DOROUGM—On the 11th inst., at 23, Grafton-street, the Hon. Lady Borough, widow of Sir Richard Borough , Bart., and only surviving issue of Gerrard, Ist Visconnt Lake, aged 88. BERTI.—On the 14th inst., at 3A, King-street, Saint James's, Flor ence Berti, aged 23. CARn.--Oa the 14th inst., at Lee-grove, Blackheath, Ar thur Lascelles Beckwith, second son of Wm. Carr, Esq . ' F.R.C.S., aged 10. PAYNE..—At llavre, suddenly, Henry Payne, Eq., ° f Ford -park, Mutley.plain, PI) mouth. WELLS.—On the 12th inst., at Dalkon, Mr. Rchd. Wells, aged 51. WYArr.—On the 11th inst., at Hyde, Isle of Wight, Car tain Henry B. Wyatt, R.N., aged 77. London Printed and Published by WILLIAM ANDREWS* of No. 112, Strand, Printer, at THE SUN Office, No. 1 12, Strand, in the Precinct of the 3avoY, in the County ktitittleee4.— r rtteelaY, June 14, le" :o