The Sun. — London, England, 1833-08-12 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. It is painful—we might add without extravagance that it is disgusting also—to witness the obtrusive and pertinacious temper of some high dignitaries of the Church of England in disturbing the innocent indulgences of the people. A correspondence has taken place, it appears, between Dr. Blomfield, Bishep of London, and a getatleman of the name of King, under whose management a series of per formances of sacred music have been carried on, by subscription, at the Apollonicon Rooms, St. Mar tin's-lane, on successive Sunday evenings. These inoffensive and highly-appropriate musical enjoy. ments have, as we learn from a letter which bears his name, been put down by his Lordship of the See of London, who says he considers them an " offen sive violation of the sanctity of the Christian Sab bath." What next, my Lord ? Is this the way "to set your house in order ?" Will you choke the charity boys who whistle on a Sunday ? We should recommend Mr. King to set the Thshop at de fiance. If the Rev. Prelate have any legal right to make such an interference, let it be clearly known, and the House of Commons, we are sure, will put an end to such intolerant priestly tyranny.—Times. We do not marvel that the Liverpool Freemen, and their more wealthy Corruptors, were seized with violent convulsions on the publicity of the Report of the Commons' Committee, exposing their abominable mal-practices, or that they entertain excessive fear of Mr. Benett's notice for next ses sion, of a " Bill to prevent bribery and other cor rupt practice; in the elections of Representatives to serve in Parl amenta and in the elections of Mayors and all other Municipal Officers, for the borough and town of Liverpool, by disfranchising the burgesses, and by adopting such other measures as may be deemed necessary." Twelve hundred of these venal g entry immediately held a public meeting at the " Golden Lion," an appropriate sign of their corrupt propensities, ostensibly to bestow the bribe of a pi ce of plate on their " Nominee" member of the Committee, John N;choll, but really to con cert measures for preserving their vendible fran. chi-ea, and to relieve themselves of natural spleen against the public spirited electors of Liverpool, who, as petitioners, so successfully exposed the long-practised and incurable had habits of the freemen. As eighteen hundred of these abandoned electors are reported to have been bribed, so lately as 1830, it is no wonder that twelve hundred freemen had the indecency to attend this meeting; but as judicial bribes are nut of fashion, we presume that Mr. John Ntcholl will not relish or accept the in tended Conservative compliment. We regret that we cannot extract the sensible c o m m e nt s o f t h e Liverpool Mercury and the Liverpool Times, and other local journals. on the proceedings of this ini mitable piece of political quackery. The character of the electors who played their parts on this solemn occasion, and who joined in the funeral dirge over the obsequies of the rotten freemen, may be judged from the report of the meeting which records that it dispersed, " giving ti ree cheers for Mr. Nichol!, the like for Lord Landon and Sir Howard Douglas (the unsucces ful Tory candidate), and three groans for Mr. Ewart." We suppose that the assembly will be again convened, reinforced by the six hun dred non -attending bribed freemen. The Stafford burgesses held their public meeting in the Tessa' Dad before the last Stafford Committee, and af fected extreme and indignant surprise that they should be soap cted of corruption. Members of a reformed House of Commons were even found last week to act as champions of the forlorn cause of Stafford. Petitioners are also on the alert to save Carrickfergus, steeped as it is in political iniquity. The tools of the Marquis of Salisbury are at work to save Hertford from an ex tended boundary. Eleven bold men comprising corporators, petitioned to be heard in vindication of Warwick, from the impeachment of the first Elec tion Committee Report, and Leamington rate payers are protesting against their incorporation with Warwick. We repeat, therefore, that Liver pool is not singular in the motions of its brazen faced and crafty defenders. Belshazzar's Feast preceded long deserved punishment. The speeches of the Liverpool corruption-mongers were extremely edifying and instructive; they will form a good supplement to the evidence before the recent Com mittee, and should be re-printed as an appendix to the report. The orators averred that other con • stituencies were equally depraved—an undoubted and unquestioned tact; and they bespattered their opponents with tecrimination—" a fool's defence" —and which, if true, only adds to the common stock of corruption. We confess that we were surprised by the perusal of the queer speech of Mr. Joseph Brookes Yates—that a man of his sense and li beral opinions should be present in such bad corn parry, arid should infelicitously liken the apathy of the freemen (we presume the six hundred bribed ab sentees) to " the son of the patriarch of old, who sold his birth-right for a mess of porridge." That notori cus sin of the Liverpool freemen is their scandalous offence ; and the sympathy of the audience was curiously exhibited in the unpopularity of Mr. Yates's impeach:nent of the close Corporation of Liverpool, which the Chairman, Mr. Moss, saga ciously interrupted by the remark that Mr. Yates " appeased to be going rather beyond the objects of the meeting." Doubtless this relapse of Mr. Yates was alien to the object of the assembly, and he twill do well to abstain from such society in future. Mr. Yates was a miserable advocate when he asserted, " that it was the gentlemen of the town that had corrupted the burgesses, who 'were too poor and too couch distressed to resist the it of a bribe." Here is the gravamen of the alregations against the freemen, viz.—the corruptibility of that portion of the Li, erpool constituency, and the fact of their frequent sacrifices on the altar of temptation. The comparative abstinence of the freemen from the usual potation and acceptance of bribes at the last contest in December palpably arose from the scare crow of the Disfranchisement Bill of Mr. Benett, which opera. din terrorein. The proceedings in Parliament, for the amputation of the corrupt limbs of the Liverpool franchise, commenced in March, 1831, when the writ was suspended, and the Com mittee of that year reported that gross bribery and treating prevailed at the then last elec tion. Aso] because Parliament was dissolved before the contemplated measure of cure could be effected, —arid because subsequently the question of general refoirn, and the pressure of public business, have prevented the progress of a subsequent Bill for (its franchisement, are the Liverpool bribed freemen at d their more criminal bribers to escape merited punish pent, and to plead in justification a well-understood aw ; running avoidance of gross bribery in 183:2 ? Can ani honest or open-minded man doubt that if Mr. Tnortiry's party had resorted to bribery in De cember, all the old sluices of venality would have been opened, and the floodgates of Liverpool elec total corruption have been drawn up? Does any honest elector affect to doubt that the return 0 1 such an " unconnected" young member of the aris tocracy as Lord Sandon, was not a natural or po pular return by 12,000 electors of an important commercial town—that Sir Howard Douglas was not " a fit and proper person" to propose himself a candidate for its representation Why did the To ries in 1831 craftily propose their" amendment" of the original English Reform Bill, to perpetuate the franchise of the freemen ? Are the " Conserva tives" friendly to universal suffrage, except when it is plastic and corruptible? But the patrons and merchants of political and mufficipal corruption in Liverpool may be assured that their devices will not sun cued, and t hat they cannot now successfully throw dust in the eyes of a Reformed House of Commons. We never questioned the anxious desire of the Corporators and Tories of Liverpool to preserve in the political custom-house the materiel of currupt franchise. W e are glad to see Lord Jahn Russell's " Bribery Bill" pos.poned to next session. It was not eflicient. It is too voluminous and verbose to accomplish it, purpose, '1 here is no val d objection to a declara tion by Members of the Reformed House of Com mons,subject to the penalties of perjury, that they have not procured their rettuns by bribery, treating, !or other corrupt practices. The axe must be laid to the routs of these upaa trees of polit cal corrup tion. 'We believe :hat the ballot can and soon will, with extended constituencies and schedule B turned into schedule A, practically exterminate election impurity. The speech of Mr. Grote was unan swerahle. We have no; sufficiently called public attention to its meths, and it ought to he cheaply reprinted and extensively circulated. But if we ate still to have open-voting forced upon us by the aristocracy—if Municipal Reform and its coniingent popular elections are not to inundate the country with bribery and beastly demoraliza tion, the statute law must be radically altered. On these grounds we deem the Warwick report, which recommends a revision of the election law, of in finite national importance; and it is high time that an example were made of a Peer who dared in these limes to provide money for the agents of vote making and mal-practices. The disfranchisement of the Liverpool freemen will also be a salutary • lesson to the constituency or the United Kingdom. We trust that the Municipal Commission will add , to their inquiries the investigation of the political habits of the freemen of the cities and boroughs. Their franchise cannot be termed a right when they corruptly sell it ; nor can that be a real privilege which depraves their motels and extinguishes their principles. We shall he curious to see whether, when purity and freedom of election are better se , cured, the Cardiff boroughs under the " influence" of the Marquis of Bute will return Mr. John Nicholl to the next Parliament, or whether Lord James Stuart will emancipate the electors of that district.— aliforning Chronicle. We have deprecated more than once the apathy of the citizens of London with regard to the forth coming election. That apathy, we are glad to say, has since disappeared, Mr. Crawford, of the house of Farquhar and Crawford, having consented to become a candidate for the representation of ' the City. It is but justice to admit, that if that important elective body have been long choosing, hey have chosen well at last. Mr. Crawford is just the man they wanted. An experienced mer chant and an holiest reformer, he is eminently qua- I fled to represent their interests, both as a political and as a trailing community. We, therefore, heartily wish him success. That in coming forward at so late a period, he has afforded a great advan tage to his opponent is certain; but if the know ledge of that fact operates as it ought to do, in stimulating his friends to more active exertions, there is still time enough to carry him through triumphantly. The great question at issue in this contest is—whether reform shall be carried into effect by its friends or by its enemies—whether the correction of abuses shall be accomplished by those who have always contended for laying the axe to the root, or by those who cannot even slip a branch from off the tree of corruption without sticking it in the ground, in the hope that it may grow again. Mr. Crawford has been announced to the electors, by several well-tried ft iends of the people, as a stanch reformer. His own declarations also prove him to be such. But Mr. Kemble we may be told is a reformer too. He will vote for the repeal of •he assessed taxes, the alteration of the corn laws, the introduction of poor laws into Ireland, and other measures of a beneficial and reforming tendency. Th's is all very well as far as it goes; bur there is a difference between a willing and an unwilling advo cate; and the great test of reform in these times, when sin public man dare profess to be any thing else, is the opinion which, he held or the conduct he pur-ued in respect to the Reform Act, at the time when that Act was a Bill struggling against the machinations of powerful adversaries. But away with all affectation and disguise Mr. Kemble is well known to be a thorough-paced Tory. He may qualify his creed or his conduct, but the great ob ject of his political life must be to stand still while the world is moving onward. Mr. Kemble may be, and no doubt is, a very honest man ; but what is the recommendation of a Tory's honesty to those who are sick of Toryism? Is it not a pledge that, so far as he is concerned, he will take care that they shall never get well? Had the two candidates started fairly, we should have no doubt about the success of Mr. Crawford. Eten as it is, we think his prospects favourable; for though our City Re formers may not be of a very sanguine temperament, they trust be accessible to shame, and the shame of being beaten is one of the ingredients in the spirit that leads to victory.—Moraing Herald. We expect that the report of the Committee of the House of Commons on the subject of the peti tion against Sir Jahn Key will be matte public either this day or to-morrow ; and, in this expectation, we postpone some observations which we deem essen tial to the placing the matter in its proper light before our readers. Just now we will only say that it has assumed, within the last few days, an aspect of even more importance than that in which we were originally disposed to view it. We did, at one time, await the issue of this investigation as one simply effecting Sir John Key, or Sir John Key's character. The disclosures, however, which have taken place within the last few days have made it one so vitally touching the character of Lord Grey's Government, so directly impugning the integrity of that Government, that we have not a moment's hesitation in stating, if they do not come forth from it pure and without a stain, the most devoted to their followers, the most pliant, or the most paid of their supporters, will hardly ven ture, with the eyes of the country fixed upon them, to support such a Ministry as Lord Grey's Mi nistry shall then have become, even with the few vo es w hich shall enable them to close this Session of Parliament as Ministers of the King. For the e-ent we leave Mr. Stanley to the full enjoyment of the speech which lie made in vindication of his colleagues when this matter was first brought for ward. But in doing this, we fear we do not leave Mr. Stanley on a bed ofroses.—Morning Post. It will be seen, from the very ample repot t which we have given elsewhere of the proceedings of the House of Commons on Saturday, that that most im portant of all the measures introduced during the present session by his Majesty's Ministers—the Bank Charter Renettal Bill—passed finally through the ordeal of a pretended Committee of the whole House—is to be pressed to a conclusion—and is likely, in spite of all efforts to the contrary, to be come the law of the land during the next ten years. From the opinion which we have so repeatedly ex pressed of this Bill, we need not observe how deeply we deplore this result, and how fatal, dangerous, and unnecessary we consider it. If the passing of the measure had pressed —if no fin then time had remained for deliberation—there might have been some show of excuse for what we cannot but term the indecent haste which has been betrayed to procure for it the sanction of the Legislature during the present ses sion—but there was not even a vestige of pretence r hurrying it to a conclusion ; for the existingßank Charter not only renews itself from year to year, hut even requires a twelvemonths' notice from Par liament to put a termination to it. While, there tore, in point of engagement as to time, there was, on the one hand, no actual necessity for bringing the measure to a conclusion during the present ses sion, it would be a matter of borne d fliculty to show, on the other, what injury could have arisen from allowing the existing contract to continue in lull foice until next year, when more time might have been devoted to its consideration—the opi- Joon of the country better ascertained upon it—and when also it might have been hoped, in conse quence, that it would have been settled in a man iier more beneficial, as well as mote satisfac tory, to all parties. Just as mischievous also, in almost every respect, as uncalled for, iii point of time, or necessity arising out iif a contract, is the measure which is about to receive the sanction of a Reformed House of Com awns. One of the points of exception to this cen -tire is a clause, wh ch was confessedly an after :nought, and was out added, by way of a rider ro the B il l, on Saturday last--we wean that which allows the formation of banks of deposit with more than six partners in the metropolis, and within 65 miles of it ;—the other exception is, that of allowing any rate of interest to be charged on Bills not having more than three months to run. We acknowledge the partial benefit which is likely to result from the adoption of these two clauses; but after all, the b nefit will be very partial in both cases, and in the one, we fear, even somewhat questionable. Be they, how ever, what they may, it cannot, and it ought not to he forgotten, that the measure confirms, in all respects, the monopoly hitherto enjoyed by the Bank—that, notwithstanding this monopoly, an enormous sum is annually to be paid, for ten Years certain, to the Bank for the management of the public debt—and finally, that when a Reformed House of Com mons h a d i n its power to confer ever lasting honour en itself, and incalculable benefit upon the country, by throwing open the trade in money to all who had money to deal in, it confirmed the most grievous of all monopolies for no sufficient reasons, and delivered over the entire circulation of the country to a body of irresponsible traders — thereby giving to them a power which the Sove reign himself does not possess—a power, as has been well expre sse d by a contem porary, " of raising or depressing, at will, the prices of all markets, aid of all moneyed securities, the value of all property, real or personal, and the returns of every speculative investment of labour or capital ; a power of increas ing or diminishing at pleasure the weight of the na tional burdens, as well as of all private money engage ments to the extent, probably, of several thousand millions And this unparalleled power is, by the proposed charter, to be lodged irredeemably, for a term of from eleven to twenty-one years, in the hands of a company of private traders in money, not responsible, directly or indirectly, to the public, —having an interest in the working of their power at variance with that of the public,—and left at complete liberty to employ this vast uncontrolled and uncontrollable power to the furtherance of their private pecuniary profit." Important, however, as the power is, the final details of the measure em bodying it were considered on Saturday last, in a reformed House of Commons, consisting of 658 Members, but of whom not more than fifty were present. Sir J. Wrottesley very properly took occasion to remark on this gross dere liction of duty in the following terms, and with his observations we finally close all remarks upon the subject :—" That clause," said he, meaning the clause relative to the establishment of banks within 65 miles of London, " was so important, that he was impressed with a feeling of awe upon it, seeing the state in which the House then was. That Parlia• merit had been elected under the impression that all monopolies should ceuse. By looking at the public papers he found that 300 out of the 658 Members were pledged at the hustings to vote for the repeal of all monopolies, more particularly the Bank and East India: yet, now when they were discus si. g one of the most important of all, there were not above fifty Members present.—Morn. Advertiser. EXCHEQUER COURT, AUG. 10. SMALL V. ATTWOOD. The LORD CHIEF BARON, on coming into Court this morning, gave judgment in this case as follows :—Th i 9 case came before me upon exceptions to the Master's report. A supplemental bill was filed, and in that supplemental bill the proceedings which took place in the former suit were stated, and the decree by which the contracts which were the subject of the former suit were declared void. The bill went on to state that the purchase money which had been paid by the plaintiff in that suit to Mr. Attwood had been laid our, or part of it, in the purchase of stock to the extent of 200,0001. The bilk were traced and iden tified, and those hills so traced and identified by the numbers and other circumstances, were stated in the bill to h eve been invested in the purchase of stock, which ultimately became 192,7661. three and a half per cents. navy stock. The contract having been declared void, and all this money having been paid under the contract, and having been traced and identified in the manner described, the ohject of this bill is to declare that those notes so laid out and the property in the said never paused from the plaintiffs, and to obtain a declaration consequent therefrom that the stock which was the produce of those notes should be considered and delivered up as the property of the plain t ffs. This is the main object of the bill. It is further stated in the hill, that this stock hail been assigned without con sideration to Phoebe Attwood, and that she is a trustee for Mr. Attwood, and that she, under these circumstances, is a trustee with reference to this stock for plaintiff, and that the plaintiffs, therefore, ought to have a creel iration that the stock thus transferred to her is, in reality, their pro. per!y. Another object of the 101 l is to asc, rtain what has become of the rest of the purchase money for the purpose of tracing and identifying it, and, if possible, to make it a subject of the declaration. A third ohject is, to have a writ of ne exeat regno issued against Mr. Attwood. The ques tion is, as to the relevancy of certain allegations ~nd charges contained in interrogatories in this bill. Besides the state ments already made, the bill goes on to state, that with the exception of the property in the iron works, which was worth 100,000/., and this stock, which is stated to be under 200,000/., paid as p rt of the purchase money, and with the ex,:eption of 40,0001., Mr. Attwood has no other property ; and it is further stated that Mr. Art wood is very much encumbered with debt, and that his debts are to such an amount that he is absolutely in a state of insolvency. 11e is called upon to ansot r certain questions put to him, namely, as to whether or not he is in a state of insolvency, what his property consists of, from whom did he purchase or otherwise obtain it, and for what consideration, and what was its value when the bill was filed ? It further goes on to inquire what was the amount of his debts, to whom they were due, the considera tion for those debts, and the ciicuinstances connected with them? This seems a most extensive, and, as far as Mr. Attwood is concerned, a most important, inquiry with reference to his interests. The question is, whether these inquiries are relevant, or whether they ought to he made a stioject of inquiry whatever may be the consequences ; and if they are relevant, that is to say, material to the scope and object of the bill, whether or not they ought to be struck out as impertinent ? The first object of the bill is to obtain a declaration with respect to the 192,000/. navy per cents. The only grounds on which the plain ifs ale entitled to the relief p, aged for with respect to this sum, which the toll states to have been purchased with the notes, the actual notes paid by the plaintiffs to the defend ant, and which were laid out in the purchase of this stock, so as to identify the stock with the notes, rest on this principle, that these notes, the contract by which they were obtained having been declared void, were Indolently and improperly obtainid, and that no property in them had passed to Mr. Attwood. After having attended very minutely to the consideration of this question, I do not see how an inquo y into the general stare of Mr. Attwood's property, and the ,eneral amount of his debts and credits when the bill was filed, can he relevant. The next guts • tion is. is the inquiry material with reference to the situa tion Pticebe Attwood stand, in as a trustee? She is charged win being a trustee of property which is stated to have been transferred to her by Mr. Attwood for the t:p i which o htabei e such greatest t a i n a t i h n- e put pose of protecti ng hi mse lf, s h e h aving no interest in it. It does not app ear t o me mater i al to ascertain this fact, and the s h e e qu e e a o rr c i e ed o m f ig th h e t e b x e te p ri rdu t o to wh: f h e i injury. It Mr. Attwo o d were Insolvent, and bad no other property, it app ears t o me highly i would have passed this stock without consideration. Another point raised at the liar was this, that this argu ment must be consider e d mater i a l with reference tothe interim injunction. With respect to that I granted the injunction, and the sole ground on which I granted it was, that upon the evidence I was satisfied that the identity of the notes was established, and that th ese notes had been laid out in the purchase of stock. On these grounds I was fat they satisfied that Mrs. Attwood was a mere trustee to illy. Attwood, and that the stocksdvasthitsranissfe,hrieed,,otloe b-r name, and she was made us e o f f or t h e purpose of sheltering Mr. Attwood. This w as t h e sole ground on g ". r .l o li u e n h d o l n g w r h an ic t l e i d l tthEienkintjhueni(ntjitinonc, and ought to be COD. ; and on these grounds I consider that I must allow the exceptions to the M ester's report, in osier that these tray be struck out. With respect to the other standing nt Its kind. passages J p er ow i of cents. a n s i tlk u , rt tl i ol'ject is to have the sum of 49 0001., and something Accountant. General in this in this o c _ s f s t e hre it e cause, trans s tel name than bolt/0,1,1.e. in reired to the plaintiffs. I shall mike an order to the Accountant- General to transfer the stock into the name 01 the plaintiffs, and to pay over to them the balance of cash remaining in band, After sot ne - conveisation between the Counsel on both it was a greed that thi s st oc k shoul,! brtiansf•tred (a i i, the i nt trustiiflfb: the other plaintiffs, en d by the to consen t Rober t S ofn POLICE INTELLIGENCE. 1 1 1ANS'ION-HOUSE. Mr. E. Gainey was charged by Mr. W. S. Hale, of Cateaton-street, a mennher of the Court of Common Council, under the follortring circumstances : Mr. Hale stated that as he and some of his neighbours were talking together in the street, on the preceding even ing, up walked the defendant, in a state of intoxication, and called him a shabby fellow. Witness 'aw the unfor tunate condition in which the gentleman was, and took no notice of the epithet. Defendant then began to improve in his abuse, and called witness a scoundrel, and continued till he reached the top of the scale of Billingsgate. At last it was found necessary to lock him up. Witness, however, did not wish that any heavier punishment shou:d be inflicted upon Mr. Gafney. The LORD MAYOR asked the drunken gentleman why he had abused a gentleman of so much respectability that no abuse could affect him ? Defendant said that Mr. Hale, knowing such was the case, ought not to have locked him up. The Constable—My Lcrd, the gentleman asked me for a pen and ink, and he wrote these here words on the card for his address. The exhibition of the card caused great Laughter. Any one would have th“ught that the pen must have been dipped in brandy, for it had reeled from corner to corner transversely, and at last tumbled down in a large blot. The constable—He was writing that ere gibberish, please you, my Lord, full half an hour, and neither me nor the watchman could make nothing of it.—(Laughter, in which the defendant joined.) The LORD MAvort—l shall fine you five shillings for being drunk, Mr. Gainey, and I advise you to keep this card in your pocket, in order, when you are next in the the same condition, to produce it as evidence in your favour. De:endant—Perhaps Mr. Hale will pay the five shil lings for me. Mr. Hale at once put down the money, and Mr. Gafney apologised and departed. AIR-PISTOL Suots.—On Saturday Mr. Carr, a gen- tleman of the Stock Exchange, stated that he hrd very narrowly escaped being shot with an air-gun. He said that as be was standing at twenty minutes before five, on Friday afternoon, wirh his back to the window of Mr. Howell's shop in Gracechurch•street, waiting for a pas senger in one of the stage coaches, he heard a sudden whiz, and the pane of glaes next to him inst tntly smashed. There were two gentlemen biking in at the window, and the pane between them was the one broken. A great deal of alarm was excited, and a small bullet was found in the shop, at a considerable distance from the window. the The size of the hole was that of a pennypiece, and it was evident that extraordinary means had been used to propel the bullet. He could see nobody on the other aide whom he could suspect of having fired. A policeman heard the smashing of the glass. The only persons opposite in the street were a Wandsworth coachman and a porter, but he was sure neither of them was the marksman. The Pewter Platter public-house was exactly opposite, but nobody appeared to have fired from that place. He had heard afterwards that some new air-guns or pistols had been exhibited on 'Change by gentlemen, and he thought the bullet must have been propelled by something of the kind. Tie Loan MAYoa would make a strict inquiry into the matt r; aed sent for a gen.leman named Bites, a scientific man, who lives near the Mansion-house. Mr. Bates, upon looking at the bullet, and hearing the statement, was of opinion that the bullet had been prn pelted from an air-pistol, which was in nearly an expended condi ion. If it hid been propelled from a full charged air-machine, tiie violence must have been much greater, as even gunpowder had not such a powerful effect. It was probable, he thought, from the statement of the policeman, that the air•pistol went tiff by accident, as the owner of it passed along the street. Alderman Scholey was of opinion that the depositions o f the witnesses ought to he taken down and transmitted to the Secretary of State fur the Home Department, in order that measures might be tak. , n, before Parliament separated, to prevent the use of such dangerous instru -ments. Mr. Bates said that there was security against the common use of air-pistols or guns in the expense of the article, the price of a good air. gun being about 25 guineas. He was not aware that they were used for any other purpose than that of killing rooks; hut they might be applied to very dreadful purposes of course. The LORD MAYOR observed that the incident was a very alarming one, for whether the shot was intended or not, blood was near being shed. His first impulse, upon hearing the stateuo-nt, was to offer a reward for the apprehension of the person who discharged an instrument so well adapted to the purposes of an assassin, He took it for Ranted, howev,r, that it was unintentional, and his obj.ct should be to endeavour to get a penalty attached to the offence of carrying such weapons. George Knight Hands was charged with baying em bezzled various sums of money, amounting to between 1001. and 2001, the property of his employer, Mr. Jenkins, the metal dealer, of Queen -str, et.—Committed. B , IW-STREBT. On Friday a boy about 13 years of age w's charged bef , re Sir F. ROE with maliciously cutting and maiming, with intent to kill, a little girl named Mary Ann Green. The prosecutrix, who appeared with her throat bound up, Laving been sworn, stated that she was proceeding along St. Martin's-lane on the previous evening, in com p iny with another girl, when the prisoner came up and demanded a penny from her, which he said she owed him. She refused to comply with his demand, and he then struck her a violent blow on the face, which knocked her down. She struck him in return, and the prisoner knocked her down a second time. He then offered to fight her, which she refused; and she walked with her companion as far as Leicester-square, where the prisoner, who had followed them, knocked her down twice, and as she lay on the ground the second tune he deliberately took a knife from his pocket, and stooping over her, stabbed her in the neck, and, exclaiming "Now I have done for you," ran away. Bridget Walsh, the girl who was with the prosecutrix at the time, corroborated her statement in every particular, and added that she conveyed the prosecutrix to a doctor's shop in the neighbourhood, where her wound was dressed. She then acquainted the prosecutrix's mother with what had occurred, and by her means the prisoner was ap prehended. The prisoner attempted to make it appear that the cut on the girl's neck was caused by her falling against a scraper In Leicester-square, but this was distinctly contradicted by ►he evidence of Bridget Walsh, who saw the prisoner in flier the wound with the knife, and heard the expression which he used at the time. Sir F. ROE ordered the pri+oner to be remanded until Monday next, and directed the attendance of the surgeon on that day, to give evidence as to the nature of the wound. The prisoner, although so young, was charged at this offict, about six weeks ago with a similar offtnce, having stabbed a little boy with whom he had some difference. He had also been repe.ttedly charged with thieving, and has been committed to prison several times. HATTON-GARDEN. THE _CHARGE OF POISONING.-On Friday Sara la Shorter was re-examined on the charge of having adminis tered a quantity of laudanum to the child of Mr. Thomas Parry, the artist, of Canonbury-street, Mr. Parry stated that the child was a little better, but that there was no hope of its recovery. Mrs. Hannah Scalth was sent for on Wednesday night l as i, when she found the baby lying on its father's lap. A doctor gave it emetics, and attended upon it until one o'clock in the morning, when he left, saying the child coul4 not survive, and he could do no more for it. It was a boy and remarkably healthy, and did not require such stuff as laudanum. Mrs. Parry noticed a stupor over the child in the morning after breakfast, and on going out she left it asleep. On her return in the evening the child was worse ; and on trying to make it eat could not. She questioned the prisoner, who turned red in the face, and her conduct betrayed her ; and on bei n g questioned she confessed that she had given it laudanum twice. She sent should o a u d c einis consulted ,w o a a d : i t s h e e d t h l l a d t wa asurgeondangerous or phys iciany affe cted under the influence of poison. Tne medical gentleman said that one drop of laudanum ought not to have been given to the infant. Mr. Sergeant SELLON—Now, prisoner, will you tell me what it was that induced you to administer laudanum to the child? Prisoner—l did it with a view to make it sleep. ROGERS--lIOW came you to purchase laudanum ? Prisoner —I bought it to cure the toothache. Mr. ROGERS could not conceive that it was sdrnini stered through ma l ice. Prisoner—No, your Worship, there was no mal i ce . Mr. Sergeant SELLON—Do yo u reco ll ect muttering to y ou r mistress on the morning that you gav e th e l audanum to the intant ? Prisoner—Y s, it was for calling me up earlier than usual; she wanted me to take the child out to walk, when I wanted to wash. It was washing clay on th e next day, and I wanted it to sleep instead 0: tiring my arii.s. --- Nr. Sergeant SELLON remanded the prisoner, and both him and Mr. ROGERS directed the officers to bring the surgeon, Mrs. Perry, and every body who could throw arty light u examinationP" tie n ' "'r to give ,tn eviu ce at the ,ex, The prisoner is rather good looking, of middle stature, awl she did not appear at all affected during the investi- gation. A BAILIFF TRICKELL—A bailiff, who had for some time dogged an unfortunate debtor residing in the neigh bourhood of Islington, determined on making his capture, arose on Tuesday morning about five o'clock, and, in order to watch his bird, he concealed himself under a edge, nearly opposite the house of the in , fividual after whom he was seeking. The man of law occasionally popped up his head whenever he heard a door op-n or shut, and two sly urchins, who were on the opposite side, seeing the bail ff's hat, at it were, upon the hedge, one of them proceeded towards the spot and made a snatch at it, and off it came, and before the officer had time to get over the hedge into the brick field, the boys had run a considerable distance, and escaped with the bat ; and while the officer was pursuing the thieves, the gentleman whom he in tended to capture quitted home, and escaped for a time. The bailiff, however, apprehended two boys, whom he brought before Mr. Sergeant SELLoN, when he swore positively , that they were the thieves, and they were re manded ; but while in confinement the real thieves were found, with the property in their possession, and in conse quence of this jfaw the whole of the prisoners were dis charged; while Mr. Sergeant SELLON severely admonished the Sheriff's man fur his wont of discrirnin ition, which would not only deprive him of a hat, but a situation, if he was not in future more cautious as to his identity of the person. WORSHIP. STREET. An elderly man, a native of Birmingham, made the fol lowing statement :—Some months since he was be queathed 1,0001., and his landlord, Samuel Careless, absconded with 8701. of the sum. He was convicted at the Warwick Assizes, and app'icant recovered 630/. He paid 100/. towards the maintenance of his wife, who had been in a workhouse, and the remaining 5001., he put in a box, and placed in the bands of a publican at Birming ham. A few hours afterwards the box was found open, and the money gone. Henley, the Worship-street officer, who was employed in the first case, promised to do what he could for the applicant; but he said there was little hope of being again successful in the recovery of the money. THAMES POLICE. RUNNING DOWN A BARGE —On Friday John Every, the master of the barge Hope, of Mildon, appeared before Mr. BRODERIP to answer the complaint of Mr. Joseph Tucker, a respectable lighterman, for wilfully running foul of and damaging a coal-lighter belonging to Mr. Thomas Doubleday, a coal-merchant of Pimlico. Mr. BRODERIP ordered the defendant to pay for the damage he had done, and all the costs. lie requested time, on which the Magistrate said, if it was not paid in 24 hours be should commit him to prison. TO WN HALL. Amelia Clarissa Beaumont, aged IS, was charged with having attempted to poison herself. It appeared that she was an actress at the New London Bridge Theatre, Tooley-street, Borough ; and having formed a strong attachment to an actor who played the part of Marmaduke Magog, without experiencing a return of affection, expressed a determination to poison herself. Her friends at the theatre then gave her in , o custody, and a paper containing arsenic was found on her. The father or the heroine said he had no doubt " a visit to the Pro vincials" would estrange her front her fancy.--Dit charged. UNION HAL L. Elizabeth Briggs, a good looking young female, was charged with having attempted to destroy herself. A P' iliceman of the R Division, who hail been watching th e young woman along the banks of the Surrey Canal, rushed forward from his hiding-place, and caught hold of her as she was about jumping into the canal. The following paper was found in her bonnet, which she had placed on the ground—" Whoever finds this paper will, if they take the trouble, find my body also in the canal. lam an unfortunate outcast from all society, by my own miscon duct. My name is Elizabeth Briggs, and if any person takes the trouble of inquiring after so unfortunate a per son, they will hear some part of my sad history at No. 52, Lie-need Victuallers' Asylum, in the Kent road. My poor mother—my brain burns—thank God, there is no child left behind to deplore the loss f its parent. (Signed) ELIZABETH BRIGGS." It appeared that she was the daughter of a licensed vic tualler and had been seduced. Mr. CHAmazas said there was a great want of females in the Cobmies, and a girl of her appearance would soon get a hu-band. The young woman said she would be thankful to be sent away from this country, where she knew nothing but misery. Mr. CHAMBERS gave some din.ctions that she :nigh be enabled to carry her wish into effect. THE PRINTERS' PENSION SOCIETY. The Sixth Anniversary of the above benevolent Charity was celebrated on Wednesday at the London Tavern, when upwards of seventy gentlemen sat down to dinner. E. L. BuLwEa, Esq., M.P., in the Chair. Amongst the company present were Messrs. Marchant, C. Knight, Clowes, West, Wire, Caslon, Whiting, F. Kemble, &c., as also the representatives of the princip .1 printing esta blishments of the metropolis. Mr. HODSON, the Secretary, read the report, from which it appeared that the Society and its funds were in a prosperous condition, and daily increasing in its resources. His Roy it Highness the Duke of Gloucester had conde scended to become one of the patron., and a liberal sub scriber. A letter was also read from the Lord Chancellor, enclosing a donation of ten pounds, regretting his being unable to preside on the present occasion, and expressing the hope at the next anniversary that circumstances might permit him to attend.—(Cheers.) Other liberal donations were subsequently announced, and the sum total mast form a great acquisition to the funds of the society. Mr. C. KNIGHT, in returning thanks when " the health of the publishers of London and Westminster" was drank, stated there were 30,000 operative printers in h • United Kingdom, and when the advantages arising from this Society became ,more generally known, he felt as sured its means of doing good would be materially ex tended. In the course of the evening Mr. KIMBLE came in, and addressed the company, and made a donation of 51. towards the objects of the Society. " Prosperity to the Stationers' Company" having been drunk, Mr. WHITING returned thanks, and said he had no doubt but that Company would continue its patronage, if the objects of the Society, which were purely of a benevo lent nature, were clearly made known to them. The festivity of the evening was ably sustained until near eleven o'clock, when the company retired. Lord LOWTHER, Lord RANELAGH, &c., took their departure yesterday morning for Hamburg, in the G. , neral Steam-navigation Company's mail packet the J)Wife. LIVERPOOL CUSTOM-HOUSE.—The net re ceipts of the Custom-house, after deducting drawbacks and repayments, for the year ending the .sth of January, 1833, amounted to 3,881.5571. Those of Ireland, for the same] , 1.507.249 period, were All Scotland 1,373,616 Making a total of Leaving a balance of £1,000,693 in favour of Livereool above the arnount collected in al Ireland and Scotland. SHERWOOD ARCHERS.—On the Ist instant the cricket-ground at Southwell, was again the scene of one of those interesting meetings which we lately b9d the pleasure of noticing, when the practice of me-ry England's ancient pastime (archery) assembled together in one joy ous company, the brave and th e f a i r, for the purpose of participating in their favourite recreation. This the third target day o f t h e S herwood Archers, was honoured by a numerous and fashionable att-ndance of many of the first families in the county, and we sinter.-ly rejoice to hear of the increasing prosperity of a Society, which is so well calculated to keep alive a kindly feeling among the mem bers, as well as to encourage an elegant and heal hfu diversion. The company began to assemble at 12 o'clock, and a ballot was soon after taken, when new members were elected. Mrs. WILDMAN, of Newstea'l Abbey, was 91-minted Lady Patroness of the day, and TiIomA ‘VRIGHT, Esq., of Upton Hall, was elected President. Toe shooting commenced Soon after 1 o'clock, at four pair of targets, and continued till 4 o'clock, when the compan) (upwards of IJO in number), sat down to an excellent repast ; afar which they partook of a wry handsom e dessert of fruit, presented by J. E. DENISON, Esq., M.P. Af er dinner the maiming recommenced, and continued tiii 9 o ' c l oc k , w h en t h e prizes were awarded. Tie b an . ' of the Sherwood Rangers played during the day, ami contributed to the animating pleasures o' the scene. Soon after 9 o'clock the ball was opened and kept up with grew. spirit till hall-p,st one in the morning. Several lather individuals have been proposed, and will be ballotted for at the next niee.ing, among whom, we are infilmerl, are J. E. DENISON, E.g., and Lady CH•RLOTTE DENISON, Adurirai Alrd. SarkiXliON, SCA .—Arottinykam Journal. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. 4 c a. NORTHERN CIR •U 1 T. AWLS. 00. THE KING V. THE PROPRIETOR OF THE WHIETHAVOI4_, w ii(0110i This tiooon th wa e s apnreasceteioenttefh of theorlibel E bro a g l of u t ht Leancsrdi:niei7ogeelalbeid: charged consisted of a publication in the Whitehtsa n , s_ll oo ` relative to his Lordship's connection with the St. Be e' charity. The case was only partly opened " LOCK, on the part of the prosecution, conser apology from the defendant. THE ICING V. STEELE ♦ND JOL, This was another action for libel of a s' and on the prosecution also of Lord Lon: dants, Mr. Steele and Mrs. Jollie are publisl Journal, and the alleged libels were publi_ on September 29, and October 20. It appear' the election in Northumberland a publication' ance, and which afterwards went the round called the "Grey List ;" another also foil, " Brougham List," and these placards put account of the moneys received by the famili and Brougham from the public purse. It w of these "Lists" being published that the planted of made its appearance in the Carlis, other article complained of as being libellous 4 20th of October, was in the shape of a commt to the Saint Bee's School charity, and was GRET LIST v. THE LOWTHER LIST." Mr. Pou.ocK having shortly stated the case the injurious effects of such publications, put al eged libels, and, at the instance of Mr. peared for Mrs. Jollie, the entire of the pul we have alluded, embracing the letter of t; was read by the officer of the Court. The Learned Judge previously intimated error in the record relative to the defendant thought would be fatal to it, as regarded him. he was called William in the informations and, after an argument of some length, the in Mr. Steele were quashed. The case then Mrs. Jollie, and after one or two witnesses Mr. CRESS WELL rose to address the Jury, without reference at all to the truth or falseli, with which, as Counsel, he had nothing to di complained of was fairly warranted, by the to which it referred, and to which it must be It was a publication arising out of the excitement of 4 .' „ tion, and ought to be judged of c h ar it a bl y, an d 1," allowances accordingly. via h . There was a disposition to applaud on Mr. Cresswe it its o a w l4 concluded a forcible apppeal to the Jury, which Was in suppressed. The Learned JUDGE summed up, and the Jury ha ODD uott'•he out half an hour, returned with a verdict of Guilty, same time strongly recommending Mrs. Jollie to merel . de d Had the case gone on against Mr. Steele, he i nt l y jdr eil have defended himself, and was p re p are d w i t h a long err° to the Jury. We underst an d th a t h e was awar e of thritioata in the informations three w e e k s ago, b u t h a d no inter shit} avail himself of it, had it n o t b een di scovere d b y his L°.,-10, The last cause on th e li s t— ano th er S pec i a l Jury orred next taken. The real p ar ti es i n t h e act i on (those enteii-efe plaintiff and defendant bei ng on l y nom i na ll y so ) were , b ytb e of Lonsdale and Mr. Curwen. The action was broug h ' 4 o Noble Earl to establish hi s c l a i m t o a p i ece of ground v!., ca used in common by th e p eop l e o f W orkington, and ' there Mr. b COURTNEY, the name of the Green." 1, Mr. HILLIARD, and another Counsel '"p name we did not know, appeared for the plaintiff; Txrnt LOCK, Mr. WIGIITMAN, and Mr. DuNoss, for the defea"licill" A number of witnesses were examined, but the pla i n i me not succeed in establishing his claim, and the Ju r ' d P" diately returned a v e rdi c t f or th e d e f en d ant. This cause terminat e d th e b us i ness f or t hi s coun ty, - n Lordship immediately left the Court. The Commission will be opened at Appleby to.morrost' COUN FRY CORN AI/ DURING LAST WEIL A.RKET 9 :ic. Wheat. Barley. Oats. Per Quarter. Carlisle Hexham Morpeth Penrith Sheffield Winchester Per Bushel. Carmarthen, , Cowbridge Newcastle (Staff.) Swansea Warwick Per 8011. Barnardeastle Durham. Richmond Stockton 5. to s. s. to s. 61 22 49 53 '25 29 49 53 24 26 61 24 62 26 51 58 22 26 s.d. s.d. s. d . s.d. 60 66 26 2 9 66 70 29 30 80 89 46 50 70 93 36 46 80 86 40 4 8 68 70 30 34 90 11 0 3 0 46 S. to S. 19 -- 19 22 18 21 19 9. 40 - 35 .... 49 p i R. a• a, 0 9 6; 50 ; 0 6! 5 0 6; 6 0 0' o 6 ° 5 ° 110 in 0 D A I 7 0 D; 6 0 I' 2 ... V .E 1.1) CORN MARKET. —Aug• 9 . 0: orfclk and Sufthlk —s. 455. to 575. N o e s l in. and Cam. —s. 40s. to 5 3 s fr, i e orkshire —s. 375. to 501 P„,„" e 67, s. 455. to I , os n' e r, ri , Red —s. 435. to 545. P. - e r .. . White —s. 525. to 59' n„„'"e,,, Barley, Norfolk and Suffolk Lincolnshire 2ss. to 27, 6 0 ;50' Yorks I'„r,"hire Vold Foreignrez Beans, Old -- N ew 31s. to 36 5 . " - , 1 1 1 " Oats, Potato 2os. to Ws• , o „ n it Poland s. 19s. to 228 ~,- -e K . Friezland and Small —s. ISs to 21 8 . ''toril Healing Shelling 23s. to 27s Od• Pe r , I Pri, Malt 35 8. 395. fine 425. P e ' J., Rapeseed 22 24 s. d. s. cl. (14 1 8 26 3O 30 3 4 33 4 0 3 0 3 4 20 ti 4 20 33 'l2O 176 S 0 86 126 14( 7 0 80 110 170 86 90 ,124 13 0 9 6 100 60 78 40 60 50 6 6 50 56 WAKEF Wheat, Red, NI Li Foreig SCOTCH M. RKETS. Wheat. Barley Aberdeen 38 48 22 25 16 20 Berwick---., 36 40 18 21 13 15 Coldstream ... 35 42 18 19 13 14 t upar 48 56 26 31 18 22 Dundee,.._ ,50 60 30 33 20 25 Elgin ---.... 40 50 24 26 16 20 Inverness.... 36 44 25 27 18 19 Kelso 36 40 19 21 13 14 Kirkaldy..—.... 48 61 23 29 16 20 Perth 50 56 23 26 20 22 The size of the measure varies throe 1 - 8 F° 20 22 4 ‘-' ao 31 23 3° 23 0 19 45 V, "u 22 23 ;bout the EDINBURGH CORN MARK] We had a large supply of all descripti, and sales were very heavy. Wheat. Barley. Oats. First 62s Od Od 22s 8d Second sBs Od 27a Od 20s Od Third.— 45s Od 26s Od 16s Od b: f'.--Aug. ions of Or Pease. 334 Od 31s Od 29s Od PRICES OF PROVISIONS. &C. Beef, per lb. N. 4d. to Os. 6,1. Fresh Butter, lb. Os. 8 84 ' Nfutton (1 5 0 6 Salt 0 Veal 0 4 0 8 Ditto, per c% t. '7O 0 Pork 0 4 0 6 Eggs, per doz. 0 7 ,, Lamb, per qr. 1 6 3 6 OatStraw(kp'.) 7 Fallow, cwt.... 35 0 37 6 Wheat Ditto.. 7 Qu trtern Loaf 0 8 0 0 Barley Ditto 0 0 ,, Potatoes, 1711 b. 0 6 0 0 Hay,perst....., 0 6 _,IV ,I. MARKET: —Aug• ~ of Oatmeal at this daY 11 week's prices. 1 tl , r 1 Per Stone of 141 b• . xo 1 First 0atmea1 ......... 0 I 6 Second ditto . , .......... 0 1 Barleyvneal ....., C $ 4, Peasemeal ...... ........ 's.—`2,l. 145.-3 d, Ms!' , KIN NI3IIIIGH MEA There was a middling supply and the sales were dull, at last u Per Sack of 2801 b lmp First Oatmeal Second ditto 1 8 0 Barleymeal 1 6 0 Feaseraeal 1 4 0 Pot Barley—No. 1, per cwt. 12 ~,r Ai GLASGOW CORN MA RKET.—Auk, I{3 l ' The weather being fine, (r Grain market re tains , d• 1 , 1 l vv i t t l i e , e a a l t t , er p a e t r i 7 4( i n n b. t h S. p d r . i ces s. d. Oat s , per 2 British, old 23 0t 0 29 0 I r i sh 15 ° 0 new . 641 b A 61 0 '0 25 0 27 6 British /1 Canada, free 27 0 30 0 Beans, per gib. ,,. 0 IP II Irish Barley, per 3201 b. Scottish . ....... , ..... 1 4 0 110 English — 0 0 Pease, Scottish ... 1 .2 6 4' Scottish M 0 24 6 Oatmeal, per 14011). 4 /0 Irish CORNWALL MARKETS. 0 05.9 Tnotto—Wheat (average) 21s.—Barley, 9s. CK I . - "" 09' 4. 6. N h V e h a t e , a 0 7s, S . p T tEnN A t t . i N S 3 T cd E e. L . . . . . . .1 d -; :. a. to to 2 2 : 2 6. 6 :B ß a a r r le le y Y , ' 97::t° 1°5'14'3 , / tis Os. to 84. o.l.—Beef and Mutton, Od. to 6d.--Pc"'" ~.0 Butter, sp. per lb. ol' C. g ' ti , LAuNcEsToN—Wheat (average) I9s.6.l.—Barley, • q 54. 3.l.—Beef. /ow 51.—Mutton, 6d. O,V M ot I.mm—Wheat, —s. t o 225. (ht.... Barley, 11s. ~ v'' to 7s. Od. d' 4 jg e BoomiN—Wheat (average)22s.—Barley, N. Od.•••" °3°' / HELSTON—Wheat, 2`.. ) 5. Od.—Barley, 94 6d. 1 0 '' ST. CoLuma--Wheat, 'los. to 21s.—Barley. 9S. t -° and Mutton, sd. to 6d.—Veal, o.l.—Lamb, Od. el l " • -.-..... 111 ...---- 11 0 0 MINING IN I'ELLIGENCB. .., 0,4 /4 á Quantity ot Copper Ore so ld a t R e d ru th b as t Tburd.7 L • c l, Average Produce_.._... . .....-^"*". v'''/Of' - 10 **''' Quantity of fine Copper.— ....- Amount of Sale, , . 4 , ‘ w BIRTHS. ioil l. l'l' 1' On the 9th inst., in Trinity-square, Southwark , f , • B. Fming, of a son. On the 9th inst., at Westmill, Herts, the lady - ~f the Ile I.'x i Pepys, of a daughter. ,:...... 9 On the 10th inst., at Curzon Lodge, Old Br e Judd, of a son. c ii _....... SO Cy MARRIED. e I le r. On the Bth inst., by the Rev. Dr. Moore, th te G. ft Morse, to Anne Emma Timberlake, relict of the 13 5 40 o f berlake, Esq., of Pullingspit House, Herts. 0' , ~., ~a n st JO On the loth inst., at St. Mary's Church, PO f,54 , 4 .p0 0 by the Rev. Mr. Millington, Benjamin PhilliP s, fr. ' f lk Bromley, Kent, to Charlotte, fourth daughter 0. Goldly, of Oxford. IV ifi S ir DIED. a e ne ol f" On the ,'29th ult., llannah, relict of Lieut.- - ro of ' Burrard, Bart., of Calshot Castle, SouthaMP t Tog,i vi ' , e 0 On the 9th inst., after a few days' illness, A i r ~er. siVel' William Smith, solicitor, Bridge.street, Manch e - v. ft. . cr On the 9th inst., suddenly, at Hastings, t he il i..w e .cou''' be D. D., pastor of the Independent congregation, 14 ' 1 0 „ ef street. ryosel -r .." On 9th inst., Mr. James Gardner, Su b: Hon. society of the Middle Temple, aged 41. i 4 P PRINTRIS AND PUBLISHED it MU it Y fivx OrncE, 111, Illskil!! 1 10, bi 1 4 .1 , 4 " 144 dr Nel r nY, 4 ' the E, ha thu n rY-t f et ht Op onsdale. Whiteharen sboo l the St. Be el fr V l ' 4 nArt led, when 0 1 ente d to r ecel c Ykii4 years tti S ix l p docrip tif , ll : similar e isdale. h e o rla" ett ;" coo ;hers of the oi p ( 0 4, e s add lished in tha t ',is% 1 1 . 'e 46 t du ward A pcarcd tha t app or• ' n made its s!' FILTH of the ne w , i mi tb e SL l ow ed, enti' sa th Court trported to IP vet • G „ lies of Ladles e oce seerwi,„ ea oseq u th was i n co c , r le ', Pati.h first a rtic— rlez, oilm isle an s O rs "t ) d . sof the dat e oire firls t munication (fot Their t d a y is entitled, s b b the llaid , d olt„ 1 1ildi n „ case, an d O f u t in copi ea D r y l„di Per. . Cresswell,l"„idi tblication to 7 80 , the c orreaP °P Vo t h a t there t o DI 4 3„, a t Steele, w , 0 ,11 yul 1. It apPea4 `'rvOß , instea d o. r r 70,0400 41 N , OY, proceeded cif 'tact .t 'P ly a: P o :ll re a b: e ! , :e d d f n i a n t e r g h i v l;_: sti is :or i ci : 4 do, the P ub :f e tt# character repll, O~T II ie taken as 3 OBC' Cement ofa_nopy Oats. I' If/ It G / ••• 46 / 4$ / ta" o 'l 5 14 pi 3 11 0,3 1 06 6 10 6 1 I) Oi