The Sun. — London, England, 1831-01-27 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. It appears that on Monday last Mr. O'Connell, and the other individuals who had been held to bail on the same charge with the learned gentleman, of " having assembled and constituted a meeting pro hibited by the Lord Lieutenant's proclama6on, and also of having conspired, by shift and device, to evade his proclamation," came before the Court of King's Bench, in discharge of their recognizances, when Judge Jebb delivered a charge, in the course of which he declared it as the opinion of the whole Court, that the acts imputed to the above parties were offerers a gainst the statute 10 George IV. The charge of the learned Judge is said to have " created a sensation." Indeed, it is calculated to produce some sensation here, as well as in Dublin, from the new and more distinct light which it throws upon the nature of the offence, for the alleged c ommission of which Mr. O'Connell and iris fellow-agitators were arrested. The public had been abused in this case, as in many others, by a misrepresentation of facts. We had heard from the speeches of the leading demagogues, or from the Press in their immediate interest, nothing of any charge but that of " conspiring to evade" the Lord Lieutenant's proclamation.—a f:tccies ul culpability unusual, at least, in terms, and likely to raise doubts and misgivings amongst the public, as to the tenability of an arrest upon any such infre quent charge. But now the truth begins to show itself: the main offence—(whether it be proved hereafter is another questien)—the main offence is one, upon the nature of which no two honest men can dispute. The accusation is, not merely that Mr. O'Connell, &c. had conspired " to evade" the proclamation, but that they had actually violated the law, by having assembled, and constituted a meet- in defiance of the legal auhority by which such meeting had, under the sanction "of the Act of Parliament, been formally prohibited. Again, we say, the charge tray not be proved, or J the bill may not be found, and so the accused parties may, in the eye of fl_: law, turn out to be com pletely innocet,t ; but all shadow of doubt (if the short report of the proceedings extracted from au Evening Paper be correctevery doubt must at onee . disappear, that an arrest on such a charge, if grounded on affidavit, has been strictly legal. With regard to the specific agitation for !he " repeal of the Union," the accounts which we have seen from Ireland would lead to the belief that many of its former advocates begin to look at the business witl mingled alarm and di.gust ; and that many more, who had observed Mr. O'Connell's proceeding , with mere indifference or curiosity, are beginning tc manifest an undisguised hostility toward. the whole scheme of that selfish and cunning, but, in all es,en, tial points, indiscreet and shallow revolutionist. The run upon the banks has ruined him v.iih a most important class of men—the buyers and sellers in every part of Ireland. The banki, under his menaces, have, as was predicted weAs ago, by this . journal, been fi,rced to contract their discounts, and thus to withhold the means 01 doing business from the farmer, the cattle-dealer, the petty merchant, the shopkeeper, throughout the whole island. There is, therefore, to that extent an end of profits—that is to say, of comfort to the middle orders, and of subsistence to the poor whore they employ. The beauty of this system of ini quity and inhumanity is, that its authors, aware, as they .cannot fail to be, of the embarrassment they have caused to bankers,and the consequent privation to those who have been hitherto assisted by the , useful and wholesome practice of banking as it has been lately carried on in Ireland, are striving, with unheard-of tregchery, to throw the blame upon the banks themselves! and to reproach them as if it were a crime, with that very measure of self-pre servation into which they have been driven by O'Connell's savage warfare against their property — we mean the diminution of their discounts. Never was effrontery or dishonesty pushed to so disgrace ful an extreme as this. But, as we said before, the juggle and juggler are fast going; a power which had been asleep begins to arouse itself,—that of common sense,—t\ hich cannot long be cheated into the sa crifice of every interest most valuable to civilized men, and which has commenced, though late, to bring together its resources for the protection of life, and liberty, and property, against that spirit, the unchecked predominance of which would expose them, one and all, to ruin.—Times. The Bristol Mercury of Tuesday last contains a long report of the Bristol Reform Mee: inky, of which we gave an abridged account in the Chronicle of Monday last. It says the meeting was " compo'ed of as great a proportion of talent, industry, aye,and of wealth too, as ever was collected within the - of the city ;" that the resolution " in favour of bat ht was carried with only six dissentients ;" arid that, with respect to the clamour which Felix Farley's Journal " has taken such care to set forth, and which, it would seem, sounded in his ears mot harmoniously, if he will but take the pains to trace it to its source, we have no doubt he will be sly thing but pleas,d with his investigation ; establish ing, as it certainly does, the fact that the people have set their minds upon Reform, and that they have determined not to adopt any other means of obtain ing it than those likely to effect its speedy accom• plishment.”—Morning Chronicle. Accounts, which may be relied on, from North, have been received, which augur favorably for the Poles. When it become necessary to ino• vide for the movement of the Russian army, it wa , found that the materiel and nnakitions of every de ' scription were not forthcoming. This will surpri,e no one who is at all acquainted with Russirt, where, from the highest to the lowest, all is pillage and plunder without mercy or measure. In Mr. Wefi ster's Travels it is observed, that " Venality and corruption pervade all ranks in Russia; and the employ6s of Government, from the very inade quate remuneration they receive, are compelled to commit acts of extortion in every possible shape, in order to be able to gratify the taste which 'they all hive for a luxurious and expensive mode of living." He mentions a fruitless attempt of Count Woron- Z3W to check the evil by cleansing out the °likes and punishing the delinquents; but the successors were undeterred by the punishment of their pre• decessors—" all is corruption nd plundering of Government and the public." Time is ever} thing to the Poles. They are publishing addresses to their brethren . the Russians, which may not be without their effect. We must bear in mind that discontent is universal among the Russian gentry. Before the first partition, Poland, in ex tent, considerably exceeded the double of the Bri tish dominions in Europe; and Rousseau, in his " Considerations on the Government of Poland," in 1772, conceived it impossible to introduce a gocel Government into so vast a region. " The first reform you require," he says, " is in.your extent. . Begin by circumscribing your limits, if you wish to reform your Government. Perhaps your neigh bours are thinking at rendering you this service. would undoubtedly be a great evil for the dismem bered parts ; but it would be a great good for the body of the nation." If the Pelts should succeed in regaining their ancient limits; and were to profit so far by experience as to afford protection to in dustry, how soon might they be enabled to set Russia or any other power at defiance. With even the half of their ancient limits, a good Government and laws might render them sufficiently powerful for self-defence. Russia will be benefited as much as Poland by the independence of the latter. " God alone (as a philosopher observes) is equa l to t h e government of the world, or half the world." Mor ?Zing Ch.ronicle. The following paragraph, copied from the Kentish C'bronicle, appeartd in our Paper a few days ti nn Dearman Pa i n , who was convicted of rso forgery , at A rO7 at late Canterbu r y Sessions, and upon whom sentence was not passed, in consequence of her pregnancy, was last wee!: delivered of a fine boy in Westgate gaol. The poor creature is doing extremely well, and appears totally igno rant of the awful situation in which she is placed." This unfortunate woman is one of th our mitigated law of forgery—that law which Sir Robert Peel introduced to the House of Common , with a pompous eulogium on its merits, as a hu mane revision of that branch of the crimin d Statutes which rakes coonizanee of those written frauds that are effected by means of forged instruments. Our readers are aware how frankly we expressed our opi nion at the time upon this, the last production of the legislative labours of the Right lion. Baronet, ;n reft te nee to the criminal code. They will recol lect that the reasons which we urged against that Bill passing into a law were responded to in the Senate; and that, after several animated discussions, the Bill was, on the third reading, thrown out of the House of Commcns ; or, to speak more precisely, amendments were carried which substituted milder punishments for its various sanguinary provisions, abolishing the penalty of death in every instance, with a solitary exception—that of the forgery of wills. But those amendments were subsequently lost in the House ef Lords, and the sanguinary pro visions restored, on the motion of the then Lold Chancellor, who most zealously exerted himself to induce the august assemblage of hereditary legisla tors to contravene, in a case where human life was at stake, the deliberate and righteous decision of the representatives of the people, and unhappily succeeded. It is not for us to inquire into the mo tives of men—their acts are the objects of our cri ticism, either for praie or censure, as they appear to us to be founded in wisdom or in error — their motives rest between their consciences and Heaven. We charge. not the House of Lords with any wilful resistance to the principles of sound and considerate jurisprudence, but we do think that where a question of life and death came before them, and the merciful view of the question was stamped with the approbation of the Commons of England, they ought to have paused before they threw the weight of their decision into the opposite -tide, and revived the law of blood ! We can hardly think it will be denied to be sound policy, that a law making a crime capital should never be passed but with the concurrence of a unanimous, or as nearly as possible a unanimous, Legislature—because life should never be taken away but on the clearest conviction of the propriety of exercising a power, which, if wrongly exercised, admits of no reparation. When Legislators or Judges err on the side of blood, they cannot command the grave to give back the victim—no writ of error runs into the realm of death. Unjust altainders have indeed been sometimes reversed by the tardy justice of the Legislature, but to afford redress to the suf ferer by the unjust sentence was beyond the " om nipotence" of Parliament. Where error admits of no remedy, it is particularly necessary that doubts should always have a retaining authority with those w'ho enact laws and those who execute them. On this part of the question the author of " Anti- Draco" says, " In criminal trials, when a Jury hesi tates upon its verdict, and the life of man trembles in the balance, the Judge invariably tells those on whose decision it depends whether the prison doors shall fly open to give him to freedom or the grave, that, if they entertain a reasonable doubt, they should give the benefit of that doubt to the prisoner. That principle should never be forgotten by Legislators proposing the enactment of capital punishments. If adverse sentiment be strong, they should shrink from the danger of de stroying life where judicial homicide has not the sanction of opinion. Where a reasonable doubt exists, they should give that doubt to the benefit of mercy—they should give it to the benefit of their own reflections, and save ti , eir consciences from remorse !" And was not the House of Lords bound to consider it matter of reasonable doubt whether death ought to be inflicted in cases of for gery, seeing that upon three solemn discussions, and with the influence of the House of Commons thrown into the scale of severity, the House of Commons finally decided that forgery was • not a crime for which the Ye of a man ought to be sacri ficed? Seeing also that petitions from all parts of the country, and from the most respectable and in telligent classes—merchants, clergymen, and law yers—were presented in favour of a milder law; and seeing that one petition, in particular, to the same effect, was signed by upwards of one thousand bankers—men for the especial protection of whose property it was said that the crime had been etigin ally made capital,but who were Lest acquainted with i , s intfficacy, and therefore supplicated the Legisla. cure that they would not continue to inflict upon them the spurious protection of a law which was too vindictive and inhuman to be capable, in a moral arid Christian country, of being carried into any thing like uniform or general operation. Such is the law under. which the unhappy woman Ann Pearman Pain had been capitally convicted, and whose sentence, we are told, has only been deferred in consequence of her peculiar and pitiable situation as described io the paragraph which stands at the head of this article. The House of Lords restored the Draconic law under the circumstances which we have stated ; and the sanguinary provisions of the Bill having been brought back to the . House of Commons, which had previously rejected them, while almost all the Members, except those under the immediate influence of the Govern ment, had left town ; to address their constituents ru antizipation of a general election, Sir Robert Peel obtained for his principles the inglorious triumph which temperate justice and enlightened humanity still deplore. Had the Administration under which this Bill passed continued in power, we confess we doubt whether even they would have dared, in spite of the resolution of the House of Commons, to ad vise the Sovereign to carry it into execution ; and, therefore, we cannot believe the present Govern ment, composed as it is of the men who led on the Opposition and thiew out that Bill on its third reading, will ever take upon themselves the awful responsibility of taking away life under the sanction of an Act whose principles they so indignantly repu diated. We are the more decidedly of that opinion when we consider that the foremost man among that Opposition was the present Lord Chancellor, who never exercised his great and splendid talents in debate with more energy and effect than in his eloquent exposure of the inhuman, impolitic, and inefficient provisions of a Bill, which, in punish ing crime, was itself a crime against civilised legis lation ! No—we repeat it—we cannot believe that the present Ministers will advise the Crown to allOw this law to take effect on the unfortimate woman in question, or on any other convict. They have it in their power now to apply to the offence those se condary punishments of which they were the advc cates. We cannot believe they will think it their duty to enforce, in their power, the extreme penal ties of a law, which, v hen out of office, they. de scribed as disgraceful to the age and country. In other Ministers its enforcement might be attributed to ignorance and obstinate prejudice,—in them it would be a " sin against knowledge," and no better than judicial murder : arid surely the instructive re sult of the recent trials for high treason in Paris will not make them more enamoured than they were be ore of sanguinary examples !—Morning Herald. ALTER ET IDEM.—YOU tell us your wine is had, and that the clergy do not frequent your house, which we look upon to be tautology.— Gay to Swift. THE FANCY.—The battle money, in the late fight between NEAL and SAM, was given up to SAM by Toat CRIBB on Monday night, in the presence of an over flowing house. Among the importations from Londonderry last week was a lot of about 200 turkeys under charge of one individual. About half of them were sent forward to Edinburgh.— Glasgow Journal. MR. O'CONNELL AND LORD CLONCURRY. —We understand that the lion. and Learned Member for IWaterford had an interview on Saturday with his Lordship at Maretimo, the country seat of the latter.—hublin Morning Post. MODERN ROME.—The only habitations now remainimg on the Palatine Hill, on the resting-place of the tabernacle of Roman magnificence and sensuality, the Golden House of N Rao, are a few cottages among the ruins by the Vignerole, and the convent of St. Bonaventura.— Asiatic Journal, No. XIII. REFORM MEETING AT ST. PAUL'S, CO- VENT-GARDEN. Last night a meeting of the parishioners of St. Paul, Covent-garden, was held at the Piazza Coffee house. Mr. Cowell took the Chair at half-past seven. The CHAIRMAN stated the object of the meeting in accordance with the following notice : " A public meeting of the inhabitant householders of this parish will be held at the Piazza Coffee-house, on Wednesday evening next, the 26th day of January, 1831, for the purpose of agreeing to a petition to the House of Commots, praying for Reform in Parliament. Mr.Cowell, parochdil churchwarden, will take the Chair at halt-past six for seven o'clock." Mr. WALKER, in moving the first resolution, ob served, that although it had been declared that uni versal suffrage was universal nonsense and universal impracticability, he was one of those who believed that it was worthy of support, and capable of effect ing great good for the country. But, at the same time, he was not so bigoted in favour of universal suffrage, and nothing but universal suffrage, as to refuge any thine else that might be offered. He would confess that he should be satisfied with trien nial Pailiaments, and what Lord Brougham hod described in the House of Commons a short time aAo. But the present system, at all events, must be got rid of: for, instead of the House of Commons representing the people, it did but - present the Peers under another name, for while they themselves sat in the House cf Lords, their spawn, through the means of influence and money, took possession of the benches in the Lower House. Another highly objectionable- point was, that the Bishops should have seats in the House of Lords. It had been thought right to make the Judges inde pendent of the Crown, and why should not the Bishops be so also ? This, however, could never be, so long as some Bishoprics were worth only a couple of thousand a year, and others as many score thousands, and while they had a seat in the House of Lords ready to swell the majority of a cot rupt Ministry. It was his firm opinion, that if the late King had lived many years longer, the whole Government would have become an Oligarchy, and the Aristocracy would have been the only per sons with any power in the country. Why was it that there was so much preaching about over abundant population ? and why did the Right Hon. Wilmot Horton deliver lectures on emigra tion, but because the Aristocracy had carried on so grasping a career, that it was impossible for the lower orders to procure an honest living; the grand cause of all which was the establishment of the corn laws, by which the foreign markets were shut against the manufactures of this country. If Parlia mentary Reform had taken place in 1786 or 1794, we should have had no long and expensive war to set a tyrant on the throne—we should have had no national debt to the extent which now proved so grievous and burthensome to the country. The truth of this statement would be perceived, when he informed the meeting that, during the period of the wars, the amount of money raised was 396 mil lions, for which the sum of 569 millions had been paid. Again, however, he begged to say, that though he was a Radical Reformer, he should be content with any reasonable dissolution of the pre sent corrupt system ; for he had no desire to act like the dog with his shadow, and give up a certain advantage for the sake of grasping at a larger, but more unsubstantial share. Mr. RULE, who seconded the first resolution, ob served that they never could hope for anything satisfactory in the way of Reform till they had ob teined the ballot ; for it was that alone which could bring them out of the land of bondage into the land of freedom. He believed that the Ministry were willing to do something; but the borougheaongering strength against which they had to contend was very great, and it was only by the unanimous voice of the people that they would be able to overcome it; and that unanimity ought to be displayed in calling for the ballot ; it was the ballot that had given such advantages to the very parish in which he was then speaking—it was the ballot that had established liberty in America—and it was the ballot that had overturned the despot of France, and by banishing slavery, had given rise to freedom. Let this, then, once be procured for this country; and England would again become, as formerly, free, great, and happy. The motion was then put by the CHAIRMAN, and carried unanimously, as were all the others. Mr. Dow, in moving the second resolution, said, that as they had at last a good King and a good Ministry, the only thing that was wanted was una nimity among the people; and he trusted that that would be evinced. Let them once obtain Reform in Parliament, and relief from taxation must follow as a matter of course. Mr. CoGdoeL, who proposed the third resolution, said that he could not give quite so much confidence to the present Ministry as the speakers who had preceded him had professed; for Lord Grey had taken occasion to observe, in the House of Lords, that he was not friendly to any extensive Reform ; and he (Mr. Coghill) was, therefore, afraid that the plan adopted would be Lord John Russell's after all, which merely consisted of giving r epresentatives to a few large towns, and which would not be nearly sufficient to meet the wants of the people. Such a Reform would not do. What they wanted was a Reform that would put an end to the cabals be tween the Whigs in and the Tories out, and the Tories in and the Whigs out—for Whigs and Tories were the two thieves between whom the country had been crucified—( Laughter and applause)—they wanted a Reform which would put an end to the building of elegant gaols, and get rid of a standing army,which had been only instituted for the protection of tithe and tax-eaters. When lie said that he could not put confidence in the Ministry, he looked at their acts since they had been in office, and could not find in them any thing to warrant his confidence. — What were those acts ? In the first place, they had increased the standing army—that did not call for any great share of satisfaction on the part of the people; in the next place, they had introduced a modification of the punishment of men on board ship—but this, so far from being a reduction of the punishment, was only putting it upon a more sys tematic plan ; then they had issued those Special Commissions, which had attracted the attention of the whole country ; he was as sorry as any one that_ property should be destroyed, but he would ask whether these Special Commissions had not widened the beach between the peasant and the Peer—and whether ally one supposed that the former had not been made to feel that all that was granted him was to choose his death—by starvation or the gallows ? —Their last act alluded to unhappy Ireland, of which he would say nothing further, but that a Govern ment that could act arbitrarily towards Ireland, would have no hesitation in doing the same towards England, when the opportunity was afforded. Mr. JuGmas, in moving the fourth resolution, said that he had been much surprised at reading that one of the Members for the Borough had stated that ballot was not advisable, and he had taken the trouble to go over to Southwark to inquire about it ; but all he could learn was, that such were not the sentiments of the Gallant General's constituents, and that if he entertained such opinions, they did not want to see him again among them. In his opinion, the ballot would be of the greatest use in Westminster, for he knew that there were many who were afraid, through the working of adverse interests, to give their votes according to their con sciences and wishes ; and, in fact, it would be of use all over the empire; for it was like the mounte bank's balsam—a cure for all the diseases that existed. If it was applicable to one place, it was applicable to another; for all who were tenants were liable to be served as the Duke of Newcastle had served his; and, therefore, the sooner such an un just power was taken away the better. It was then agreed that a petition, grounded on the resolutions, which were declaratory of the neces sity of a Reform in Parliament arid the ballot, should be presented, to both Houses of Parliament—the one by Lord Holland, and the other by Lord Althorp. Thanks were then given to the -Chairman, and the meeting broke up. ELECTIONAOF CHAMBERLAIN. Yesterday the contest was renewed with unabated spirit. Alderman Waithman appeared to have ac quired fresh vigour from the immense exertions he had been nicking from the moment the canvass com menced. The Hall was crowded during the day by partisans of the candidates, and the voters were ap plauded or hooted according to the public character of the men they supported. At one time there was a great bustle in the Hall, and up walked Mr. Cob bett, amidst yells and laughter, to vote. When asked for whom he voted, 'he said distinctly and emphatically, for " Sir James Shaw." The recep tion of the worthy Liveryman, upon making this fact known, may be pretty well guessed at. About the same time in marched Sir Claudius St,phen limiter, who said every bit as emphatically, that he came to vote for Alderman Waithman. The announcement was received with immense cheering. Sir Claudius gave to some friends, as his reason for voting for Alderman Waithman, wh,n every body expected he was going " to do the other thing," that Waith ' man had been always consistent, though sometimes wrong; but that Shaw wus often wrong, and often inconsistent. At three o'clock the following numbers were exhibited : Shaw 3,405 Waithtnan 1,936 By which it appeared that Alderman Wattlitmn had gained 14 , upon the day's poll. The exhibition of the numbers was received with the usual testimonies. Mr. Sheriff MARSHALL then addressed the vast multitude. If they would not give both candidates fair play, they would have cause to regret it, as some of their brother Livery now wisher: to make come communications of interest to them. Sir JAMES SHAW stood forward, but not a word could be heard from him except by those upon whom he actually breathed. He declaiel, that notwith standing the great efforts of his lion. Friend, ex emplified as they were ever since the election com menced, and the slight superiority on the day's poll for Waithman, ,his (Sir James Shaw's) confidence in his friends was not in the slightest degree abated; on the contrary, he was convinced that that very circumstance would provoke his friends to a more resolute marshalling of their forces. The yelling did not cease till Sir James Shaw withdrew front the front of the platform. Several gentlemen on the busting's declared that they would not allow Alderman Waithman to be heard, as they could not obtain a hearing for Sir James Shaw. This declaration was very near caus ing what is called a " precious row." Alderman WAITIIMAN then sppeareffin front, and was received with the usual hearty demonstrations of welcome. lle now stood forward once more to request a patient and fair hearing for Sir James Shaw. (Alderman Waithman then retired, and the Livery seemed disposed to pay clue attention to his opponent. There were loud calls for Sir James, but the worthy Baronet did not come forward.) Alderman WAITHMAN said that Sir James Shaw had declined making any further address, in conse (ponce of exhaustion, which could be very sincerely pleaded. The poll had spoken sufficiently for Sir James, but as it had trot used such eloquent lan guage for his opponent, why his opponent would even speak for himself.—(Cheers and laughter.) The contest bad risen in importance every day. It exhibited in a more striking manner the characters of those public men who were struggling to main tain a reputation for integrity by the very means that proved the utter absence of principle. It had ,been said that the contest had nothing to do with politics. The very denial of that position was one of the contemptitde manoeuvres by which the faith less crew were distinguished. They did every thing, they resorted to ever y expedient, to hide their epos tacy.—(Groans, and cries of " Shame, shame.") The leading men amorist them were the leading men of the comm:ttee of Alderman Wood and Alderman Venables, and Alderman Thorp ; and those, not satisfied with voting, had vigorously combined and canvassed against the man they were bound by al the ties of conscience and gratitude to support.—l (Loud cheers.) That day a 1 sw exhibition had taken place, which, it it had occurred two days sooner would have secured hiS election by this time, by the very force of the public indignation. It would be recol lected that Mr. Slade and Mr. Routh, the latter of whom, by the by, intended to offer himself for the city of London, told him one day that they were going to subscribe to bring Cobbett into Parlia ment. The Livery has just seen Mr. Cobbett re turn the compliment by voting for the gentleman whom his patrons recommended.—(Cries of " Shame.") A combination was most foul at best, but here was a combination " most foul, strange, and unnatural." But never more could those wor thies show their diminished heads—never could they again appear where the word Reform was uttered —(Cries of " No, no")—never did he feel more strength when advocating that glorious principle than he did at that moment in fighting the battle against his false friends—never did he feel greater confidence in his own power titan at that moment. —(Shouts of applause.) If the Livery of London would but exercise a corresponding spirit, his name would soon take precedence of that of the Worthy Baronet. He thanked most cordially those honest men who had crowded to the poll that day, and he retired amidst cheers. Mr. Sheriff MARSHALL said, that as the Livery seemed, upon the appeal of Alderman Waithman, disposed to allow Sir James Shaw to be heard, the Sheriff considered it but fair to permit Mr. Dillon to address the Livery, upon the part of Alderman Waithman. Mr. DILLoN (of Fore-street) then stood forward amidst loud cheers, and read the following letter from Sir Francis Burdett, addressed to the Chair man of the Westminster Committee : DEAR Slit,--I am sorry I was not earlier aware that I had any power of serving Mr. Waithman in his election for the Chamber lainship of the city of London, or of mark ing with propriety my sense of the invariable conduct of Mr. Alderman Shaw as a public man, and particularly of his conduct as Sheriff towards the electors of Middlesex during tie great contest with Mr. Mainwaring, the pre siding Magistrate, and Aria, the gaoler of the Coldbath fields prison, and which finally and fortunately established the independence of the great metropolitan county. Upon that occasion Mr. Alderman Walthman's exertions were net wanting on the one side, any more than Mr. Alder man Shaw's on the other; both laboured as they always have laboured in their vocation, and both are fairly and equally entitled to the support of all those who maintain the same principles with themselves; but that Mr. Hume should withhold his support from° Mr. Waithman, and give it to Mr. Alderman Shaw, is news indeed. It both grieves and surprises me ; he cannot surely know the his tory of the times is which we lived previous to his en trance upon his public career, or have a notion of the dangers and difficulties and disadvantages Mr. Waithman exposed himself to in maintaining a cause few men ven tured to own, though now become fashionable; nor, on the other hand, of the obvious line of 'safe and selfish po licy his antagonist, with all the self seekers of the day, then followed ; verily he bath had his reward, and if it depended on the electors of Middlesex, I am satisfied Mr. Waithman would now, though late, reap his. I sincerely hope he may, not se much on his own account, although I am anxious on that also, for I think he deserves it, as on account of the public, to which nothing is more prejudi cial than the constant example of unrequited efforts in its behalf, accompanied with mortifying neglect. lam glad to hear that Mr. Hobhouse presides at the meeting to day ; it must be pleasing to the electors of Westminster, so many of them being electors of Middlesex. Had I known in time, and that I could have been of any use, I would, notwithstanding my old enemy, the gout, has held of me by the heel, have put myself into a coach and come up. It is troublesomeato write, so I must end. Hay, the goodness to give this letter to Mr. Waithman's chair man, with 50/. contribution towards his expeaces. I remain, dear Sir, your's very.iny, _ I3URDETT. Brighton, Jan. 25. describe the to the writer of the letter, proceeded to "'concluded by condition of the Corporation, e and amidst loud denouncing in very strong languagd, the inconsistent . Mr. DILLON, after some cornplinaentary language and false friends of liberty. inconsistent Mr. WOOLER described the Corporation of Lon. thsoLtediwntglomout from all other bodies in the be designate c d h o e n e r sa,s article of corruption. The House of Commons was, in comparison, purity itself. He was prepared to expect the appearance of Mr. Cobbett in aid of their exertions, for the man who had run from Eng land. when he thought the country was in danger, the least that could be expected wag, that he would do honour to the party to whom the community was Fo dear.—(Laughter and cheers.) The Sheriffs. were about to adjourn the Hall when Alderman WAITHMAN again stepped forward. He was convinced, he said, that the Livery would do him justice for the feeling by which he was in- I fluenced in addressing them. He tad, notwithstand ing the dangerous illness of his eldest son, and other considerations of a private nature, borne up against the fatigues and labours of the contest. He had de termined to give the honest members of the Livery the opportunity of recording their votes, and he had shown that if their efforts had been actively seconded, his antagonist, whose resources were ' quite exhausted, must have yielded. He felt, he must say, disappointed. The office which he sought was one of emolument, but he had failed in his object. The balance was in favour of his antago nist, and he (Alderman Waithman) must be satisfied henceforward with looking narrowly into that ba lance, seeing that it was not handled in prejudice of the public.—(Cheers from all parties.) The event was the result of conspiracy—a conspiracy but little understood, but formed of the vilest ma terials—of men who skulked from the public, while he, against whom they were confederated, had lived in a glass-house all his life—(Laughter and ap plause)—but, like scarecrows, they should be held out to public detestation and scorn. For 36 years had he been working for the community, and nevea. had he put one farihing in his pocket of remunera tion. He had pursued a course, whether with abi lity or not the Livery must judge; but he had pur sued a straightforward course, to the injury of his worldly interests, to the prejudice of those who were dearest to him by the ties of nature—and this was his reward. But would he therefore swerve from the course upon which he had commenced his career of virtuous independence? If those who re joiced in his disappointment supposed so, they were grossly mistaken. He should with his dying breath support the great cause to which he had devoted himself —(Loud cheering.) Alderman Waithman then told the meeting that it was not the intention either of his friends or himself to trouble his fellow , citizens any further on the occasion. The meeting then adjourned. LAW INTELLIGENCE. SECONDARIES' OFFICE, JAN. 26. MOWER. V. HODSON. This day a Jury was summdhed, before Mr. POTTER, to assess the damages in a case of crirnina conversation, judgment hating been allowed to go by default. The damages were laid at 3,0001. Mr. Serjeant SPANKIE stated that the plaintiff was a gentleman who held a civil situation in India, under the East India Company, and had married a lady, some years ago, by whom he had several children. In consequence of the ill health of the lady she was obliged to come to this country in the year 1826, and in England she became acquainted with Mr. Hodson, a gentleman of fortune and high respectability, having first been introduced to that gentleman's mother and sisters. The plaintiff had always lived upon terms of the greatest affection with his wife, and their last parting in India most powerfully testified that the attachment was mutual and sincere. Such were the embarrassments of the plaintiff in India, that he could not, without the po sitive destruction of his circumstances, have accom panied his wife to this country. Most probably the fact of her having come from India unprotected by her husband would be dwelt upon as a proof of neglect upon the part of the husband, calculated to depreciate his claims to large damages; but it would be proved that, if Mr. Trower had left India, his situation must have been filled by another; and that situation pro ducing between 4,0001. and 5,000/. a year, the sacrifice must, to a man ulready considerably in volved in difficulties, have proved nothing less than fatal. The Learned Serjeant then proceeded to de scribe the usual effect of the seduction of a man's wife to the injured party. He admitted, at the same time, that he was not instructed to say one word against the defendant's character or moral conduct anterior to the unfortunate transaction which formed the ground of the present action; and there had been no acquaintance between the plaintiff and de fendant. The Learned Serjeant then adverted, in an eloquent manner, to the advantage taken of the unprotected condition of the lady, and concluded by calling upon the Jury to give the plaintiff such damages as would operate i n showing that there was a strong sympathy in the minds of British Juries for men whom circumstances compelled to be separate from their wives. Doctor Ward proved the marriage between the plaintiff and his wife, and that they always lived on the most affectionate terms together. Mr. Mangles deposed that he knew the plainti ff and his wife, and that they always lived on the best, terms. The parting between them, when Mrs. Trower was quitting India, was most affecting. Mr. Trower could not possibly accompany his wife, as, if he had ventured to do so, his place, which was worth 4,0001. or 5,000/. a year, would have been forfeited. Mr. Trower was in embarrassed circumstances, and could not have afforded such a loss. Mr. J. Taylor, solicitor to the East India Com pany at Calcutta, also bore testimony to the impos possibility of Mr. Trower accompanying his wife to England. Mary Price deposed that she accompanied Mrs. Trower front India to this country, as children's maid. Had lived in the family a considerable time, and always observed the most affectionate conduct on the p.trt of husband and wife. In London Mrs. Trower became acquainted with Mrs. Hodson, the defendant's mother, and his sisters, and himself. -They reciprocally visited. Mrs. Trower went to Italy afterwards, where she met the defendant and the family,. and they returned to England together. Witness observed nothing improper between Mrs. Trower and defendant in Italy. Mrs. Trower, afterwards went to Sittingbourne, where the de fendant joined her. From thence they went to Canterbury, where they slept in the same bed toge ther. They went after that to France, and witness left them at Paris living together as man and wife. Charles Field, butler to the defendant from the year 1821 to 1829, gave evidence of the intimacy between his master and Mrs. Trower, after the re turn of the latter from the continent. His master kept several servants and carriages, and lived like a man of fortune. He. was about 37 years of age, and Mrs. Trower was about 40. A clerk to the defendant's agents deposed that he collected about 2,0001. a year in rents for the de fendant. A clerk to the plaintiff's agent proved that Mr. Trower allowed his wife from 1,300/. ttr 1,7001. a year. Mr. • ADOLPHUS (for defendant)—The children have to be maintained and educated out of that al lowance ?—Yes. Did Mrs. Trower ever draw any of the allowance after her intimacy with the defendant ?—Never. Mr. S ce e r r t gan a e inty t . S P N A v N e IC S mean t h o e m n e ac ve e r a no pplied i after wards,imputation of the kind upon the defendant. Mr. ADOLPHUS said that, from the most ancient and fatal crim. con. upon record—that of Helen v. Argos—down to that last tried at Westminster, in which a shilling had been awarded as adequate da mages to a plaintiff—the injury had been always in. iisted upon as the greatest a man could possibly sus tain at the hands of another, whatever might be the circumstances. He, however, must be allowed to say that there were strong shades of difference be tween different cases. There certainly was nothing in the present case calculated to show the claim of the plaintiff to large damages in this case. His wife had been separated from him for a great length of time ; had been at liberty to do as she pleased ; was wholly unrestricted ; had reached those years which, it might be supposed, would have ser r her from seduction ; and the defendant had) 111 unfortunate mom en t, yi e ld e d t o the solicitation I pas.ion, sublimated by the fervid climate of I ts They had met together in the midst of the pciri,, and the frequent opportunities they " a conversation begat that intimacy which so grew out of an unrestricted intercourse. 'M ere 0 been no violation of dom es ti c p ea ce intende" t the part of the defendant, and he (MN Ad°1 11 " 1 , - , assured the Jury that the long absence whi,% fit taken place between the husband and wife u.. ,1 the feeling., particularly as the distance 0 4 - 1 , 0 long. No insult was offered—the defenda nt done ev er y t hi ng a f ter th e transact i on comPla ine don e that a man in such c i rcums t ances c ould have A u and the plaintiff, who i s 50 y ears of age, " a- A : tamped no very serious loss in the loss of thela"l,ll Mr. POTTER summed up, and observed therhip disagreed with th e L e a rne d C ounse l (Mr. Ade tlt l P on the subject of the effect of distance render in g li r, affections of a wife less strong or less valuable, Po ticularly when s h e h a d c hild re n t o r ivet the 131 went. The Jury ass e s se d the d a mages at 1,5 u.. TUE MARKETS. Adair's irn Alain Ord Reactigh & Beau- ritONTRACTS F 4 ' t ' VICTUA LLI '.l HE Comr Fmaj esty ' s N 4 ~NriAY' die I.th d reetive Tauders ;At Kupp'y o f the 1 r ~,,,tl6;l4o4,ll;setrige4aAgilr:sailt.nileittgYisne:Helfibpar.icE:thotu.: ItAst ............. 04114eAT ......... )lAlSilis. ............. And slim for the w ing A rt i c l es as ',wi ng until the 'll st C. rati444:Olt:tbeeP o l i sit:o t: ll e :l C ce o l3trii n i ta t P-atch Tender rai k delivered h llid the PlArbell 46 belialf, must a 011 ibt. o,pn_lturs : au Ali Walk a P ob A A: yrt i ENTL l ktirrad his L Illittem, in the et L road. tleu , ara EUR ''EAN LI 140 ' 10, CIIATF JOHN CI VVANTEI pr t 44.13,0 under fi)r w e h r icZ : 131 t ratio n to Al lilt court, Corn 25th Jam. 1831 b I,* Any pers, ,DitopEAN CIT 08 Y op LONG T i NsTyruTi HE folio RAT O RES ha 4/ J O RATIONALE ' hsHN GROB laced on Want, vs.LITERATUR rrofessor VENTI 51404, the 16th a INSECTS, 8/ CIIARLE S tbe WlLl)NicsnAr, RLOCUTION ILLUSTRATIO ; to cornm.4 qtrADRUPEI v tO beity ofETAIILES L ondon. `4(1., LL.D. • tt %A I lth of May R ESPIRATI( % RTE.! h° , E, q , ,11v continual ...conitrience on AS.CHITECI tt of AIrAGE, E sq. Jus, - Lectu re I Subscriber s a' '4'411 for arc' b tetkling-room gi INNt Periodic tetes. c ores , ti Nal e Liters Lift:. for it • Zeach, German " 4 ' the attai lot Conversation ! ,71a Subjeci • •rAtitairy, Tw o 11. Guineas 1:481. each. Q u i ' 1 " are adr Jana annually 183 l'1 " T bISc COAL 51AII 335 OA. 35 0 31 0 mon, --- 31 6 West Hartley 32 6 WillingUm 35 .3 W lain « 34 3 WallsEndliewieke&Co.. 36 ti Ditto Bell Robson & Co. 3.5 3 Walls Ent Brown's 34 3 Walls End Callerton 31 0 Walls End Carr and Co. 33 0 Ditto Cramlingtoo- 31 6 Walls End Goforth 36 0 Ditto Heaton---- 35 9 hips at market, 63X 'S DU S. to S. 55 62 61 '76 64 72 56 74 44 72 54 86 48 74 54 83 84 62 62 81 65 84 51 76 64 80 '62 73 54 58 64 78 65 74 48 78 43 74 58 78 59 72 64 68 s. to s. 32 38 26 28 32 40 32 39 28 40 36 40 23 32 30 35 •14 48 32 42 28 38 30 36 30 42 32 42 37 40 34 38 40 42 32 38 28 43 28 47 26 34 24 36 Kr.—Jan. 26. •541 Walls End Hilda 35 0 Walls End Hotspur'"' 30 0 titto Notthumber4to 03 Ditto Peareth..--- , - - ' 55 0 Ditto hi11.{, 36 , Walls End Russell's... , 3i ; Ditto Walker S 5 Lambton rrimrose 31 Cl'al:s End Hettoa ••."' 51 ; Walls End Lambton,^ n Walls End Stewart ; HW:TEti.e3RusselPg Hett. „. _t 1 1 0 6 Primrose 5rna11„....•• . ' 0 ips sold, 34 1 4 —Unso -- id 746 Wheat. Barley. 1 Oa ts. s. to 0. 21 32 20 2 4 32 26 3 9 23 23 26 3 6 26 3 5 20 3 0 341 40 5 28 34 22 30 5 18 32 49 16 31 , 25 31 , 28 32 22 3 2 30 3 6 24 34 28 og 1 23 " 4 21 27 32 CoUNTRY CORN MARK Per Quarter. Abingdon- Andover Birmingham—.—,. Ilridport ------. Cirencester Faringdon--. Guildtbrd Henley Hereford Highworth --- Maidenhead - Oakinghain --- Reading .....----- Salisbury Southampton Stroud Tewkesbury Uxbridge Vnlncilster INorec.ster---. SCOTCH MARKETS. HA DDINGTON CORN M A KRT.—JO' 1 1 . 00 The prices of a 1 kinds of Grain sold in this mark et h ot to-::ay. Barley is Is. 6d. up on the toc, and sd. 01 10 0 ,1 rage-217 quarters sold. Oats are up Is. on the top, .19411 on the average-305 quarters were sold. Pease oil , both op on last average—Pease 3s. Bd. and Beans 30. ' A, stands Is. higher on the top, and 2s. on the average. 00? Wheat. Barley. Oats. Pease. 010 First 7os Od 423 64 32s OA 45s Od• pi I Second 64s Od 383 Od 27a Od 433 Od 0 , Third There were DS qrs. of Wheat in market, • where° 23 Unsold.-13 Grey. 3/. 3s. 4d. 0-12th5_!......// Average DALKEITH CORN MARKET.—Jam 01 There was a large supply of Wheat in the market of tv,poFo which met with a ready sale, at rather higher prig"' of this day se'nnight. voi Wheat. \ Barley. Oats. I ['ease. 00 4 First 79; Od 42s Od 30s Oil 42s Od 98 1 p$ Second Third 56; Od 32s Od 22s Od 36s Od GLASGOW MARKETS. (From the Glasgow Herald of Monday) „ The demand for Raw SUGARS this week P o ol limited, the sales amount to 275 hhds. and tiet O are rathei lower, moist brown Demeraras sold °l 465. ; dry browns 475. 4d. a 495. 6d.; lout /1 !, 1 00 50s. ; middling 51 , . a 545. 6d. ; and brow n 10' hel° 475. a 435. For West India Molasses t here kl o s partial enquiry, 250 puns. Demvrara were in the warehouse, and a parcel of Trinida d at 25 1 3 i , the Quay. Refined Sugars are in steady dernsndoill alteration in prices: brown Loaves 775. a Sls ,; 83s. or to 91s. for tine. Candy 10d. a I OP' ` Molasses 20s. 6d. a 21s. Crushed Sugars 51.600 steadily : middling at 60s. a 62..: good m iddling p i a 655. ; good 665. a 635. ; fine 695. a 7 0 s. $ fine whites at 71s. a 745. No sales made in COFFEE or PIMENTO. boto l 'il A small lot of East India Rica sold at 130. 0 1 , 0 iido Nothing worthy of remark done in Ruas •401.1' 0. P., 2s. 2d. a 2s. 4d., and Leewards 20d. a pro fs. '0 In DYEWOODS there l.as been nothing dose ' eft e foi The transactions in ASHES have not bees pd Sales were made in Pots at 345. 3d. a 345. 6d.5 1) in retail at44s. St Y. C. TA 3 LLOW iS selling in small parc elo 475. 6d. „, Fish Oats are dull and lower-Whale 45/. ivg. Pale Seal 451., and Cod 411. a 421. per old In retail at 435. a 445. t 4 ''' Y. C. TaLLow is selling in small parCe' , S 3 ~o ; . 14 ()N i s. 17s. 6d. Fish Oats are dull and lower—Whale 45/.l°6' "'ld 9 ' Half 1 exte _ -.... Pale Seal 45/., and Cod 41/. a 421. per old 1' 0 : h ; ' ho d li ve P ----,.. 1-1, 4* h ' Prof \I . IRISH MARKETS. /1 , t 44 l' th e ' e ' r( 'Po Jar , 0 , i 'AN Publi c ' DUBLIN MARKET NOTE.-FamaTt o 0 , N T e 1 ' From 7 6 0 i , t.UN, " 4 , wi 1,467 Wheat, per barrel 20 stone 30 0 ii i .tt i ,,i' ', so , 336 Bete ...«...,.... 17 stone 15 0 1 ' l4 i D e ,'" and 4- 779 8ar1ey.,.....-.............. 16 stone 16 0 1 8 6 ", I 1 ' , (111,, , Pis 3,4p3 0at5.,....... 12 stone 13 0 15 ii 0 ',elk ''' in a 10,3199 Cwt. Flour -- 9 stone 8 0 2 6 a '4 - O r io I , t = r es3u 1,435 Oatmeal-- 8 stone 13 6 18 0 6 , , tv / ina n Sold to Bakers only. ,:ci.' lk 10 1. F. ner ' 8,466 Cwt. Flour 20 0 0 a5 0 :• ,,, i ,- Or i - ) Average price of Wheat and Hour 563. B *„', V - 04. .% 0 7„, mi tt - Itop i , Firsts, from I, ''' od.. Iv q° 'out vi- 4. Receipts of Flour, 18,2041 . , 4- ' 4 * . ,39 , F.c . onds, ........ 6 , i et. eve 4 froM V i ' ckl. t 3 U7 "I RF Sales of Do. 10 Ihirds..-....... from • t. I'6 ry p, PRICE OF BREAD. eit, 104 tl, ~....Faculty, Quartern Loaf. 10 , -Ad. 1 Half Quartern ‹o r , Fi lli ng D Wheat, Barley. Oats. I Floo r ' ' ~,, jre barrel per barrel per barrel i v P i ., I 241 stone. 16 stone. 14 stone.t '''....• tli,,, _......._ - , t . b. ° Cr ' xi I T s. d. a s.d. s.d. a s.d. s. d. a s.d.o. (I. a ti C l O rOF AI th ALM C0rk......,,... 32 0-37 611 0-15 9 9 0-14 921 0- 7,/ 0,0 ip, ~..• --4, 11t1,, Limerick 33 0-38 4 14 6-15 84 11 9-15 0 18 o- 0. 1 ,h •vith th -, Imiti i Waterford 33 0-3 ti 014 0-16 013 0-14 017 0- 4- „ z i ( 1 l' o r, , 1541._ .e deter Clonmel... , 26-380 11 6-15 610 6-12 620 0- ",,i t V f t , '`l il l ~, g 1 Carlow.... 26 0-30 0 12 0-10 0 10 0-13 0 :2( . j__.f_.% — t cr. r Whi , luare: isot 4t ' , tO4 "it i s Beef, Mutton, Pork, ~,A . : 0 ' 4, ; th e „ - ttani no . per lb. per lb. per cwt. bit- ''' ...-- 6. o y p POI 8 .. PI -.-........--...- —.----- --.....-----. ---- ...1 . ,d• i g ( 1 s ne er v i pg .d. ad.d.ad.s.d.a S. d. 4, 8. ,N t o ~ 1 1 V( N te ' equal • Cork .--.3i -6 3-6 21 0-28 090 0 g,' 0 75 L',, 0 0 , ~, WA, , 1 1 Limerick.- 3-43 - 4 32 0-35 0 O, ( 6 1", / 0 .._ vli ki , 4 114 ' Waterford 2-4 3 -5 28 0-31 094 ( 1 „,' „ .... n '' V," 'Llep t i rPF . ,D Clonmel .... 3-53- 4 28 0 -30 00 8 I""' SI ' ' toil Pit ' this 8 Yd ' Carlow.... 4 -5a 0-00 0- 0 00 8 ,‘' 0-01 i °' th, ° a i who t l36•W "'"es, 0 haa Knicarray.-Butter 99s to le3s. per cwt.; 2 , t o j oy • Ivell i _ " all lb per barrel ; Flour 245. to 425. per bag; Oats_l ID. ; , t. ; ' „, 4no w ,, rel ; Barley 14s. to 16s. ; Beef 26. to 4.1. 1_ ~ e r ~er ' c a 't'' 1,.“)11 " art to 434 d. ; Potatoes 4d. per stone; Coals Is. tat. 1 i . wi NI) PANI I SO I Pigs 32..5. to 335. per cwt. "k W R 8( f I So a ! t Y to n 0 p ~ in BIRTHS. ~, 000/ It i 4 very h i On the 25'h inst. of Clapton, Mrs. -L'e f t Very . (l ob IN 0 11 p, m i ld still-born. Portlll4°-h li t 'IV S O 13 On the 24th inst. in Baker-street, O e • s St, A it t °l lady of J. Lling,.Esq., of a daughter. 101‘10 0, 4 ' h• -Old N- -t On the 24th inst. at Leamington & oa t , . 1 w at hi s 1 Capt. G. Baker, R.N., of a daughter. ._.,d, ," s • 11 4 4 4 re1m 0 ,,, On the 25th inst. in Cumberlandarghterii: le,odtby most' square, the lady of H. Busk, Esq., of i 8 0 13 f S' i l , C;A r t '`',,i 4 T o On the 23d inst. at Woolwich, the latuY met h . 110 N pilf 44 ,-red h • ford, 8.A., of a daughttr. t he Stain , • On the 2241 inst. at Chorley W OO 4 Morris, Esq., of a daughter. l'i! Atl i P; all 11 0 I '44 Q th MARRIED. v _bill, er tr ea soi On the 26th inst. at Sepulchre's , S ll° ‘ i 'le f: -________ only / Cl/1 3 Truss, of Reading, to Mary Ann, co • do ll' 6 T ., EII W. Young, of West Smithfield. 'TiO. : t r oct l l: l k t ir .clE 4 10 On the 25th inst. at Sr. Pancras, T• to : ,t r i rt ev er M.D. of Keppell-street, Russell-W ire ' 'fir, Ava tbe° Kid; °r •s, 8. , Maria Wathen, second daughter of 14 ' It e o f 4 4 o e/%, Irris s a Hunter-street, Brunswick-square . d .,, tnoll ,r , As tfor t iker D i . , On the 25th inst. at - Bury St. r-A llll c S e ge, rite 4 ' It ta , 4 liag a , T. Wilkinson, M. A f St. Peter s r o • C'' *i t , 4 ttik„ a „ *, 0 Reci° ^ th third son of the Rev. M. Wilkinson/ ~ I. L e ni e l, e Salt ' Suffolk, to Caroline, third daughter 01" of ?n . ,: na kaa t et' *ato r f", P, ' of Bury St. Edmund's. DIED. ..._, I. e ld!l . ~,I, 4 , p er " im pur e«. t . 1,41Y7 Wheat, per barrel 20 stone 30 :336 Bete« l7 stone 15 77) 16 stone 16 3,403 Oats 10,31)9 Cwt. Flour U stone 8 1,435 Oatmeal Sold to Rakers only. 8,466 Cwt. Flour Average price of Wtseat Receipts of Flour, 18,2041 Firsk Secol Sales of Do. 10, 399 PRICE 0, -1010. _ n o. DIED. a otr cerOony the 26th Vincent Havillanilt ei, to cit .ecn ' V i On the 25th inst. at Hampstead, . 9 stet r . l 11. Rivaz, Esq., of Stoke Islovington, -200,1011,,d, the Chamberlain's office, Guildhall, in WI 0 1 :6 1 n orif y On the 22d inst. at her house at Dev o e sauna Byron Somerville, relict• of the 13t 6 '''-' if inerville, RN. aged 69. Slliti infantOn tdlaieng2hlt.etrinnsft.Ga. tßl:lToualyolgenr,e,EsSqt.el'i:ll:oo? On the 11th inst. at Reading, Lieut••`7 i i s r , late of the Ist or King's Dragoon Gilaar`m )ear of his age. re , -1 - 4 v eran, 14 ereu g 1! ) , "e fe itale '41 4 Par t , c t 0 _ 1 , 04 ° 44 from d "ClO • 2 04. SlO , Op~atio'4Ch• i ri i A n" S it N sa i 111: :11b tarel ` 4 4 tt uYLIE 141 % s t pri • n yu- P RINTE D AND PUBLISHED BT MOO' colgO; TH E SUN OFFICE, 112, STAASP,