The Sun. — London, England, 1833-05-07 00:00:00

f / (./0/( • ..--7 17 .- , ./. / ~.,...,_-• ,4.., . , ')' V, , 14a:A 'k., -. 47 -- ... - , - ÷e- 9... ~ • • .----scr < „ ,_;, _ - 7 ...• . , fit'lN.:.... , -,:;;,,x,f /t ' 4,- .... 2- Fit . 0 _ :•, ' * .p.: , ' ,-, ? - _; . .1k:.--i,-...,.. • ' _..„._.;_, f.,.-) , - 8,- ... 7 --- " , '::-, P "'Pi. ,-,t ''' -, - - ,-;•-g - -:k 0 - . 6... - - '"..,.... .. ~., a - • 1 , ,• ~. .- cr . . \ , 1 .„., -- - •' ''.- Il.i i,. .iik... „ ,, 4 0 - - .4";t ,. 1 r *' C___,i" ii)k - '-„ '.,. . 4 „ ...,„ -, - --:,. ' fj -:, ‘.......4,....- 4--- . __..-- ~,, 1,0 1-A ...fr . '. -... . lt riiiipk,T.- 4 w F l! • :map,: 0i T ..4 1 ;',...,: VOW' • . ~ au-. . 111.4°141. ACADEMY, SOMERSET.IIOUSE. EXHIBITION of the ROYAL i tia • • A CADEMY ii now OPEN. O ne Sh (on (tom eight till seven) One shilling ; Cata illing. le to the 04' house, 1 1 ° 11 " w' ; e Winn, a big , 0 410EIOLS hock l4 were 9 . .. 0ur5 i0 ik to ri to protect HENRY HOWARD, R. A., Sec. 1 ~ SONIERSETSHIRE SOCIETY. , 7 "L TWENTY-THIRD ANN IVER isRY M EETING of the GENTLEMEN con -1 N i th , , the County , of SOMERSET, will be on \s.,,t)Ay, the 15th dnv of May, 1833, ' 11 011sp • . tI ARL -, Al dersgate-s, reet. at the AL ES KEMYS TYNTE, Jun., EN.) Xi) " in the Cltair. w , SIEWARDS. r , ',, b ‘eaden , E N. : mi,rose Lethbridge, F.sq. J, ~ Anatchbuil, Fsq J. Simpson, Esq. .'' stdon, F., q. '-. T . 'H. Fry, Esq. H. Hy e, Esq. i li t k e P i nner at Five o'Clock for Six precisely. :‘lZ,li",oonte or Guinea e S e e a c e r h e ' t r mayy , h N e o h . a s d , of the Stewards, " I Ple, or at the Albion. King's Bench- I) . , r , P. HURD, Honorary Secretary. 1 4 t4ti e ._ c e object of this Institution is confined o t n o u. t n h: th, e 'eg the children of the deserving poor -1 7 _ , ' 't t°4tl' oiSorners,t, resident in London, and eter 'ahist them in bevinning business. LONDON, TUESDAY EVENING, MAY 7, 1833. i order each! workhouse. wo ( PRICE 7D.) ( : 1 N o. 12015.) 1 ) 11E, LONDON GAZETTE :G ENC.P. THIRD EDITION. THIS EVENING. cation, boki.e!:o ~,r , lel°l " f idol 1 a we re 00, land," were SUN-OFFICE, Seven o'Clock. DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY. PETER BOND, wine-merchant, Worcester. M ro E Ii.IA IA ) :1 ri-Z. LIAME NT THIS EVENING. BANKRUPTS. JAMES SAUNDERS, nurseryman, Abervivenny. WATSONi DICKINSON, hair-manufacturer, Ewer street , Southwark. WlLLlAM LEE, commission-agent, Henrietta-street, Co. vent-garden. ROBERT JONES, hat-leather-cutter, Bridge-street, South wark. THOMAS ROUTLEDGE, scrivener, Shrewsbury. JAMES RADCLIFFE, cotton-spinner, Stockport. JOHN MA RSTON, surgeon, Market 'Wen ' Lincolnshire. EDWARD ROBERTS, pig-drover, Tyny Coed, Caesmar. vonshire. conferred :•• HOUSE OF LORDS. Lord SUFFIELD presented 50 petitions from Wes_ Ryan Methodist congregations, praying for the immediate Corpui. repeal of slavery. The Earl of RIPON presented four petitions to the same effect. RET E ,I3INRURGH STEAM SHIP. 1) 'I,„RNE'NITED KINGDOM, Steam Ship, R, Comman&r, will start from off Qra for EDINB URGH, on SUNDAY, M ay l2, , 4 ea o i e`vii, A.m. and WED N ESDAY, May 22, at 1 4 r 4 rei l e. ' ek in the ' Mornin g , an d SUNDAY, June 2, 41 01: • in the Morning, calling off SCAR rogers W earner permitti❑g. km4 wilt be em b ar k ed at Greenw i c h , f ree o f es itll),,)4l th rtnerly, "t ensiv the la e improvements which have been made h o, f ii t wi nter in th e h u ll an d machinery of t • ePeed will he greatly increased. Qt. t i r ; ti " arcels received at the Spread E.gle O ffi ce, 6, f 2i • Piccadilly ; Cross Revs, Gracechurch- Z, un wne's.wi • ' o'clock of the day ti;l five ~,4 ,r th,. 'Nei sails. k,/f t - t , 4I "Y be taken , a Plan of the Cabins seen, and irk ] rtner information obtained, by application at the ti lt 7rlo e ? f6 ce, Regent-circus, Piccadilly (the only t t ,htr,,;: ", or t o GEORGE BELL, lu 7 , Fen- The Earl of Roselyn, the Duke of Richmond, the Bishop of Winchester, and Earl Cawdor, presented petitions to SAMUEL MARTIN and JOHN MARTIN, silversmiths, Cheltenham. WILLIAM AITWOOD, watch-maker, Lewes. WALTER BRIDGE, Jun. and JAMES STANDRING, timber-merchants, Manchester. .he same effect. The Duke of WELLINGTON presen'eil a petition R-.UGGIN'S PATENT DOUBLE BRIMNIED VENTILATING BEAVER HATS, are by far the best kind of Hats ever yet produced, weigh ing lees than four ounces; will never injure by wtt, or lose their colour the brims being double, they cannot break, or go out of shape ; they will not prevent the egress of perspiration, which has been so much the complaint of water proof hats, often producing the headache and the loss of hair. Pr ice 21s. and 265.; Drab and Brown Hats at the same price. To be had of the Patentees, Duggin and Co., SO, New gate-street, near the New Post-ofkce. Boys' and Men's Beaver and Silk Hats, from ss. and upwards. Caps of every description. N.B.—A liberal allowance will be made to merchants, captains, and dealers. from the Mayor and Corporati6n of Waterford, praying for an alteration in the navigation laws!. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE presented a petition IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. h o f S* , ' Al lts oP last, me pq teed jot° s' from the Protestant Dissenters of London sndWestMinster, praying for total and imme iate abolition of slavery. Th e Noble Lord then presented several other petitions to the HOUSE OF COMMONS, lifer 6. The SPEAKER took the Chair a quarter before five o'clock. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said the petition from the Ministers and El.lers of the Presbytery of Dunblane, so far from being against the Bill, was perfectly consistent with it, for it prayed that in any alterations that mieht be made, provisions might be made for the suin?ort of the Protestant religion, and fur the reading of the Scriptures in the native language. Sir 11. PEEL sail he never imputed to the petition that it was not against the Bill. The petitions were ordered to lie on the table. Sir R. INGLIS presented two petitions against the Irish Church Temporalities Bill from the clergy of Ches ter, and float the parish of the Holy Trinity in the city of Cock. As to the question which had been put, and which had occasioned the discussion a few minutes before, be mu•t say that a question might be put in such a mode and form as to be very much like an assertion. He remembered that Mr. Wilkes once said en the hust ings that lie wished to put a question to en oppo site candidoite, tint not to make a speech, and he asked "who had killed his washerwoman?"—(Laughter) —meaning, as it might possibly have been meant by the Hon. Member to-night a direct assertion. He hoped that Honourable Members would in future be more cautious in their mode of putting questions that had such a tendency as those to which he had alluded. same etreet. The Earl of HADDINGTON, seeing the Noble Secre tary for the Home Department in his place, way anxious to ask him a question, which was Pf very great importance to that part of the coanty front which he came. It was well known that his Majesty was visiter of the universities of Scotland, which was performed by commission, one CoUeg e * ;e. which he sat, made a series of reports, one upon each university, and in 1830. they made a very full general report, which contsinerl many recommendations fur changes in the system of conducting those establish age. liege. 111—. 1 ES are particularly and most t ° t 4Anl O ectit illY requested by A. B STRANGER to tr 414 Advertisement in the Morning Poist of the 6:, ; 6 th h ° 4 t h of April. and the Morning Advertiser o Itt t ZN:', l7 th. He begs to inform the Ladies that l k ' 1 111 4 '4 to the Continent for a short time, but a 1 41. , r ed t '4l ‘t n him at the General Post-office, St. Z ra .dt will be deposited in his box, and kept uis return. DR. COURTENAY'S LAST POPULAR WORK. The ISth Edition, price As. AN HISTORICAL and PRACTICAL TREATISE on SYPHILIS and its CONSE QUENCES, illustrated by many extraordinary cases. To which are added, Practical Observations on Diseases of the Generative System, on Nervous, General, and Local De bility, with a superior mcde of treatment, the result of upwards of thirty years' extensive and successful practice. By C. B. COURTENAY, M.D., No. 27, Howland-street, Fitzroy-square, late of Robert. ments. ✓ He was not now going to say whether all those recommendations ought to be acted upon, but he was most anxious to know from the Noble Lord whether Govern ment intended to carry them into effect or not, or whether any of them were intended to be so. Since the report had been made it had excited a lively feeling in Scot land, which bad now grown into great anxiety. Lord MELBOURNE said that those of their Lordships who were acquainted with the case would know that the report was a very voluminous one, and contained recom mendations which, if carried into effect. would alter the whole constitution of the universities, as well as the course of study pursued by the students. These were the only reasons why Government had not earlier brought forward the subject. He would, however, assure the Noble Earl, that the case was now under the consideration of Govern ment, and Arne of the recommendations had been referred to those who could best decide upon the expediency of them. lENTs• aAnQ phipPs , / , 0 u son of 00.4, b 140,, LM pre , e s v COrY ° Of tOrY he l ot ee tele ° , ,he aPP a'P r i s st" ' ler, near Cola'- 0f Ail)! os, ley of VPv fi c" GlO ueettertroto V etberell; street, Adelphi. Printed for the Author, and sold by Sherwood and Co.; Paternoster. row ; Onwhyn, 4, Ca. herine •street, Strand; Marsh, 145, Oxford-street ; Chappell, 59, ;Su therland, 9, Calton-street, Edinburgh ; and all Booksellers, / RKE T9 y pe Oats ' s . to 0 . 4 0 IS 19 00 16 16 19 20 Of whom also may be had, Dr. COURTENAY'S celebrated TREATISE on STRICTURES of the URETHRA and RECTUM, i❑ which Strictures of from ten to twenty years' duration have been effectually cured in a few weeks, and its supe riority thereby fully established, being the Twenty-first Edition, price 3s. "The luminous views taken of these diseases, together with he important warnings against excesses, entitle these works to great prai , e, and we may add, as a farther recommendation, that they are written with much delicacy and morality."—lnspector and Literary Review. " We entertain the highest opinion of Dr Courtenay's profes sional skill, and congratulate him on his successful and judicious application to those severe and often fatal diseases."—European Magazine. 7 - 2 4 2 /- 36 4 0 gx 33 5v ` 4 0 8 0 56 00 ‘2O 99 22 g 6 ~,n 46 s‘2l° :3 5 , 3 , 9 ° 4 46 t ;1 ,... ,,° ° 40 ____..--: gaY / fr it T.••••• 54i , A .ts. CO 6 ,,„ 61%aW lOs, CO 0 , 0 to s( ''' 6at i s 15 s . to 58 ,,,,1 60 6 ,0 to t in' SY , •24 tO t oe )• • no. n e 0 1 , to'' t rie !, o, ns. to 60! 5 9 3 , to „ 4s. 61 1 : 511 r2s to o T 9,. 6 0 0 4 1 ,2' to gl'• 010 [7g . . to ` 2° '' one, 15 3 to 1911 ;t to o ol ~ ii ) et t d A le tTit• _ may 2 01 d, 01 rter. 6° lo 01 ........ l 0 1 1 sack) 1,3 0 I bale- - I 0 gall). is ajt I" , 2•2 4 1 1 / ) ) 45 45 5; 51 ow, uahO u t he c. i IP/ ;rain o es o o l ° reO e. 40 ;32i ro 7,61 v. 30 4 2t 15 to lj. o &C. 0 :er . 8 v 0 n " , 1 doz. a " 6 kpl.) 6 itto•••• ~0 0 tt •-• 6 0,11. 6 j, ket one 01 141 , D ; . real ......... tto •• t'.4 • it'd .. . .. gal 1: o e., sin. 01. ire., der er 10. .. I ,0 ....... ........... 0 Per 7., 50 .... jon .... 111 - ..- igu „140 1 b• 45° ;"greab."' ;TS. ,Ooly ,to I A ey, toy, 04/ 0 1 1 Ba rtel , 91. / 00 ley, 64 ; 4 1 0 o'l*s toe„ , to 7d: Tos T two y ge,ll h urdA I ir cbo' Loy o'l°oo' A tr d &l lte' ug h ter .he Fa rgun_ rt i,e ~4 fi g hter hire,Jebyr, rei o f Lowe of on, t: s4 ' the coun — s „0114' ickenlll ol illiauri 7 01, leY- 11411.° Ch' l l use, ire ofl e jane,,,l e r A t days" O if Phio e-a., ls le 01 elict of teld,So,ol ;hire , A g erV ert fi ll reef , I vor' 0 0 ,bent p i Or y 0 1,4009 g" il l MAN HIS OWN DOCTOR. OE EFFICACY 01 Dr. B R • d with Re DeAVE'S RED PILL, No. 2, sea led he 1::1Z113;le114tIVS OF EITHE SEX (assisted by t fol k -vs P Dubious Directions therewith given) are enabled 44414,'"etually all Bilious Diseases, Scurvy, .Scro ftst-44) ss P u r ity of Blood and also a certain Ins i dious 1rk 444 'v et t/ to facilitate the Recovery of Health, w 4i 1 1 :1 1t t kit Y. known and atr tiL e Y of this medicine is so well ons. S~ eu old .. (1 for 50 years past, that any further c 0:f: 14 I:;4;etd unneceseary. rdsstr.. B "ger, No. 150, and Airs. Chandler, 76, ellt.kt ; Savory Moore and Co., Bond street , and Paul's E t Yi ► ; J. Gifford St rand •J. Hartis, .St. 0 01 its itt 4 ; .1. Marriner, k Che m : p sid e ; Stradling, Roy al _ . t',olltr, wligroith and Co., No. 29, Haymarket • ; a u nt . P.l ll ' tteha Pel ;G. Pink, Borough ; Yeatman a nd 0 414 1 r... "feet, Cripplegate• R. V.aylatt, Paveme Ott,llop4:, h. Johnston, No 68, Cornhill ; R. E. Dea .s , , pirTstreet ; Norton and Turner, Holborn ; W. 114 411 14414'ent-4tr " t ßermondsey-greet e ne Vender., price 41. 6d. • per box. COURT CIRCULAR. The Duchess of KENT entertained the Duke of BRUNS- wxcx and a large distinguished party at dinner yesterday, at the Palace at Kensington. Prince TALLEYRAND gave a grand dinner last evening at his residence in Hanover-square, to the Duke D'Ort- LEANS, the Russian Ambassador, and Pi Mersa LrEvF.N, the NeapoThan Minister aed Countess LunoLF, the Prus sian Minister and Baroness Butow, the Belgian Minister, the Baron DE WESSENBURC (the Austrian Special nni ster), the Austrian end Spanish Charges d'Aff ires, the Duke of DEVONSHIRE, Earl GREY, Earl and Countess GRA NVILLE, Lord HILL. and Marshal BAUDRAND. The Duke of BatiNswicK visited the Duke of CUM BERLAND yesterday. The Duchess of KENT and the Princess VICTORIA drove and walked in the Parks yesterday. Mr. Gawra, M.P., Lord SANDON, Mr. LYALL, M.P., and Mr. PARKER, had a conference with Viscount AL THORP yesterday at the Treasury respecting Danish claims. Earl GRANVILLE visited Viscount PALMERSTON yes terday. A deputation of the Western Central Committee for the repeal of the window and hou-e taxes had an inter view with Lord Avrnortr yesterday. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. NEWMARKET SECOND SPRING MEETING. Monday, after Three o'clock. ARRIVALS. —The Duke of Portland, the Duke of Rut. land, the Marquis and Marchioness of Tavistock, the Mar quis and Marchioness of Exeter and family, E irl Strad. broke, The Eail and Countess of Chesterfield, the Hon. C. S. and Mrs. Wortley, the Hon. Colonel and Mrs. Anson, Mr. and Mrs. C. Wilson, Sir M. Wood, Mr. and Mrs. Stonehewer, Captain Grant, Mr. 1101yoake, Mr. Wor tall, Mr. A. Hunter, Mr. C. Greville, Mr. Hunter, 840. Several horses have left the town for Epsom. Lord J..rsey has sent Lucius and Gleomnre for the D, , rhy, with Blunderer for the gallops. Mr. S. Wood's Titian has gone in company with Ambrosia. This morning Lord Exeter's lot left, viz.:—Sir Robert and Cletus for the D,rhy, an.; Mantilla anti Anoima for the Oaks; Byzantium to follow them after his match. The list for to-day falls short of expectation ; the Han dicap of 10 sovs. each did not fill; and the snatch between Lord Chesterfield's Tourist and Mr. Hunter's Rouncival will not be run, Lord Chesterfield having paid forfeit. There are, therefore, only two races, which ctme off thus: Match.—Mr. M. Stanley's Skinner beat Gen. Grosve nor's c. by Stainhorough—Twatty. Betting, 6 to 4on the winner; won very easy; the winner ridden by Wheatley. The Wretched Stakes of 100 ROM each, h. ft. ; colts, Sst. 716. ; fillies, Bst. 41b. A.F. not engaged in the Derby or Oaks. Lord Tavistock's c. by Sultan Lord Conyngham's brother to Blythe Lord Stradbroke's c. by Sultan 3 Won by a head. Betting, sto 4 agst Blythe, 2 to 1 agst c. by Sultan, and 5 to 2 agst Phantom. BETTING ON THE DERBY.-11 0 2 agot Glaucus, IJ to 2 aust Forester (taken), S. to 1 atzst Revenge, 8 to 1 agst Llewellyn, and 8 to 1 agst Sir Robert. OAKS.-5 to 2 agst Tarantella and 10 to 1 agst Chan tilly (taken freely). KINGSTON HOUSE ROOMS, MONDAY NIGHT. The following important changes have taken place in :he betting : DERBY* 6 to I agst Mr. Ridsdale's Glaucus (taken eagerly) to 1 agst Mr. hunter's Forester (taken) 8 to 1 agst Mr. Rawlinson's Revenge Si to 1 agst Lora Exeter's Sir Robert (taken) 9 to 1 agst Mr. i hifHey's Prince Llewellyn (taken; 11 to 1 agst Mr. Wo d's Titian (taken) 15 to 1 agst Lord Verulam's Little Cassino 16 to 1 agst Mr. Cooper's l'watty colt 33 to 1 agst Colonel Cosby's Bravo (taken) 23 to .1 agst Mr. Greville's Br. to Grampus (taken) 50 to 1 agst Lord Egremont's Br. to Waxlight (taken; 1000 to 15 r.gst Duke of Grafton's ]Egyptus (taken) OAKS. 5 to 2 agst Mr. Cooke's Tarantella 10 to 1 agst Mr. Stonehewer's Chantilly (taken) 10 to 1 agst Mr. Batson's Reveley 14 to I agst Alecto (taken) 20 to 1 agst Mr. Thornhill's Funny (taken) ST. LEGER. is to 1 taken freely ~bout the Tutor. GRAND PIGEON MATCH FOR ONE RUNDRED GUINEAS o'clock. The match at pigeon-shooting, for 100 guineas, between Mr. Edge, the gunsmith, of Manchester. and Mr. Deigb ton, of Sheffield, which was commenced at Sheffield on the Bth of April, terminated on Tuesday week, at the White House Hotel, Huline, near Manchester, in favour of Mr. Edge. The articles of the match were, that each should shoot at 100 birds, 50 each at Siieffied, and the same number in Manchester ; the person who kiled most birds in the two days at Sheffield shouldithe entitled to receive 401. from the stake, and he who killed the an t he 'mos who the two days at Manchester al.() to receive 401., d killed the greater number of birds in the four days' shoot • ing to receive the remaining 201. In the tu o days' shoot ing at Sheffield, Mr. Edge gained nine birds a head of his antagonist. Mr. Edge killed in the first day 21 out 01 25. In the two days' shooting at Manchester, Mr. Edge had a majority of 3 ; Mr. Edge did not shoot so well as in Sheffield, which was mainly owing to an injury he ha d received in the shoulder, by the kicking of the butt-end of his gun. The Earl of ROSEBERRY said that be had the honour of presiding over the board spoken of, and he felt deeply upon the question. Not only those belonging to the Universities and the students, but the public were much indebted to the Noble E trl for the answer which he had elicited. He hoped Government would now have time to turn their attention seriously to the subject. He felt anxious upon the subject, because he was aware that many of the recommendations, it carried into effect, would have a most beneficial tendency. The LORD CHANCELLOR said that the Gentleman had not only received the report alluded to by the Noble Lord, but several reports from other places, upon which which they intended to act as speedily as possible. Earl FITZ WILLIAM presented several petitions for the abolition of slavery also a petition from the members of the Political Union of Glasgow, praying for the repeal of the Corn Laws. Mr. BERNAL and others brought up the Personal Estats' Bill, Cotton Duty Repeal Bill, Tiles' Duty Repeal Bill, awl several road Bids. Earl GREY presented petitions from London and other places for the entire ah"lition of slavery. The Duke of SUSSEX presented a petition agreed to at Exeter-hall, for an alteration in the criminal laws of this country. The petition V/ 43 signed by 5,300 persons, several of whom stated that they had not come forward to pros , cute in several cases owing to the severity of the laws. In looking over certain tables he had found that when the punishment for any offence was capital, the number of acquittals increased, whilst when the punish ment was slight the acquittals were on the decrease. LORD LYNDHURST called the attention of the House to a Bill which passed the House at a late period of t last session, which changed the punishment of death for horse-stealing to transportation for lif and in twenty-nine cues out of thirty the law was enforced. As the law at present mod, the greater crime might be panished by nn e risonment fir twelve months, while t e lesser were punished by transportation for life. The avowed object of the Bill he complained of was to make punishment certain ; hut could not that be done by leavin g a discretion in the count. N.. doubt one offence might be tried before a juege who was more severe than another. there the punishment for the same offence a ould be different but t,e did not consider that a snfficient reason why the jud e should be deprived of that discretion which he had always heretofore used. Ic it were right .o take away that discretion, iu this particular case, it would be expedient to do it in all. He threw out these hints for the consideration of the Noble Viscount, and entreated him to bring in a Bill to amend that one of which he complained. One other subject he would lay before tiers, which was the great increase of crime within the last 20 years. 1n1522, the number of criminals did not amount to much more than 6,000, while in 1132 they amounted to upwards of 20,000. This was not confined to any parti cular district, but was the same in agricultural as in manufacturing districts. Neither had it been in any year, but had been gradually progressing.—( Hear, hear, hear.) He made these statements from returns on their Lordship's table, and, therefore, entreated the Noble Viscount and his Majesty's Government, first of all, to see whether there was any fallacy in the return ; and if they proved correct, anxiously to inquire into and ascertain the cause. Lord MELBOURNE answerel the Noltle Lord at some length, observing that in no case where a judge had re commended a mitigation of the sentence had it yet been retu•ed. Lord LYNDHURST explained, that the amendment referted to by the Noble and Learned Lord had been made on the suggestion hi the Lord Chief Justice of the Comm to Pleas, and supported by the late Lord Tenterden. Lora SUFFIELD prevented petitions for an alteration in the criminal code from Londonderry and aritY her pl ice, and also praying that persons under conviction, or for trial, be better maintained. The Bills brought up from the Commons were then read a first time, and the House adjourned at half-past six o'clock. ROUSE OF COMMONS. Thl SPEAKER took the Ch.iir at a little before five QUAKER'S AFFIRMATION. Some private business having been disposed of, the Coleraine Election Committee came to the table to be orn, and was called over in the following order :—Mr. Irton, Lord Sandon, Sir Stephen Glynne, Mr. Parrott, Captain Chetwynd, Mr. Pease, Mr. Chaytor, Mr. Hardy, and three others. The names having been called over-- _ Mr. SPEAKER said I wish to call the attention of the House to the situation in which it is now placed for the first time. I feel it to be my duty thus to arrest the course of its business; but &hen I have stated the calls:: of my having done so, it will he for the House to decide what course it will pursue. The reduced list of eleven Members in this Election Committee has ;Amy been re turned to this House. The Act states that these eleven shall be embodied into a Committee, and before it proceeds to any businesss, shall be sworn at the table. One of the Members so returned, the House has decided is competent to discharge his duties as a Member of the House on making his affirmation. But the qees• tion for the Howe now to ennui ler is, whether that deci sion necessarily comprehends the duty to be performed by a member of this Select Committee under a special Act of Parli iment. Can the Hon. Member sit in this Com mittee without taking that oat t, or doing something else which the House shall decide t, be synonimous, and equi valent to that oath? In oth ,r words, is the affirmation upon which the Hon. Member performed the duties of a Member of this House to be c.•nsidered equivalent to the oath directed to h e taken by this separate Act of Parliament? Mr. O'CONNELL. I rise to move that the affirmation of the Hon. Member forDurh im be taken as equivalent to the oath required by the act t be taken by the members 01 election committess. The principle on which we for merly decided that the Hon. Member could take his seat on making his affirmatio n clearly governs this case. That decision of ours r sted upon th a construction of various acts of parliament enabling the people called Qu iltere to make an affirmation instead of taking an oath. Those acts do not expressly contemplate the c isie of a Quaker becoming a member of parliament; but the House considered rt to be implied, and the implication seems of necessity to follow in the present case. The principal act of p irlioment re ferred to substitutes an affirmation in all cases, with three exceptions—any case not excepted cornea of course more stronaly within the general rule, and this is not an ex copted case.—(Cheers.) Mr. SPEAKER. What ere the excepted cases ? Mr. O'CONNELL—The excepted cases are, the giving evidence in criminal cases, the being upon juries, and the holding of ernolumentary offices under the Crown. Now certainly this is no office under the Crown. The Corn mitte, is not a jury; nor is it a criminal case that is to come b e fore it. I therefore he to move that the affirms lion of the Hon. Member for Durham be received instead of his oath. Mr. SPEAKER--I am persuaded that no Member in the House, not even the Hon. and Learned Gentleman who has just addressed it, will conceive that I was improperly actuated in bringing this mater forward (Cheers.) lam sure he will pardon me, also, for my, perhaps, rather disorderly call upon him to state the ex. ceptiens. Of course the third exception, that preventing the affirmation of Quakers being taken upon entering into any office of emolument under the Crown never came across my mind. What did occur to me was, whether it was possible any analogy might be thought to exist between this case and that of serving upon juries, or giving evidence in criminal cases. The Hon. Member is of opinion, and probably the House will he of opinion, that the case before us comes within neither exception ; but, looking to the criminal consequences that might occur to parties interested, I felt it to be my duty to bring the fact before the House.—(Cheers ) Mr. O'CONNELL—I trust the Chair did not so mis understand me, as to suppose I could say any thing that did not recognise, I hardly like to say, the propriety, for it is too weak a ward, of its interference ; for I felt, in common with every Member of the House, that what was dome by the Speaker was per fectly consistent with the whole course of his con duct. It is impossible to doubt the fitness of his calling the particular attention of the House to this case, being the first of its arising. I have now the act of Par. liatnent, containing the exceptions before the House. and I find them to be what I stated. Having allowed the Hon. Member to make the affirmation on beconsing a Member of this House, it would be an anomaly, indeed, for the House to decide that more than his affirmation should be required of him to discharge one of its incidental duties. Sir ROBERT PEEL said that the anomaly might exist, and required to be removed by an Act of Parlia ment. He did not think the decision they had come to in the former case neeessarily governed this, which rested upon an Act of Parliament passed subsequently to the Quakers' Relief Act. He considered, however, that this Committee did not coins within either of the three exceptions in that Act, and that, therefore, the Hon. Gentleman might be allowed to make his affirmation. Mr. GODSON read the clause in the Act of Parlia ment, providing for the admission of the affirmation of Quakers, and stated his opinion to be that the affirmation of the Hon. Member in the present instance came under that permissive clause. Lord MORPETH was understood to say that he had a notice on the books which he treated would remove all difficulties like the present. Mr. J. JEItVIS said, he knew that Quakers were ad mitted on Junta to try civil cases; indeed he knew an instance of a Quaker having been on a Jury, who con victed a person of a capital felony, and the man was executed. Lord ALTHOQP thought that as the House had al ready decided that the Act of Parliament did not prevent Quakers from taking their seats in the House. the same rule should apply in tha present instance.—(Hear.) The SPEAKER said that he had only done what be conceived to be his duty in calling the attention of the House to the subject.—(Hear.) As the House seemed to feel so strongly and to concur so unanimously in the recepuion of the Hon. Member's affirmation, he would suggest that the affirmation be received with the consent of the House, but without the formality ot putting the motion of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman (Mr. O'Connell.) Mr. O'CONNELL, with that understanding, withdrew his motion. received enabled him to say that there was a progressive increase of Irish vagrants, and of consequent expense. In the county of B--rks the number of persons passed by this law for the last five years had been 2 ; 272, 2,660, 3,300, 4,300. and 5,359; at an expense of 5681., 666/., 825/. 1,051., and 1,1751. In Wilts and Gloucestershire three was a corresponding increase, and he might state that the average cost to the three counties for the last five years, was—for Berks, 8551. ; for Wilts, 1,000/. ; and for Gloucestershire, 1,285/. Tons much for toe road from London to Ireland via Bristol. On the road by waa ot Liverpool, the increase was of a similar nature. T. .e Hi.n. Member concluded by moving for the Select CO 111 tee. The question having been put, Lord ALTHORP admitted that great inconveniences had arisen from the system complained of, and he thought it deserved inquiry; he would not, however, while he assented to the motion for a Select Committee, pledge himself to any particular course at present. Mr. COBBETT trusted that in any law that should be proposed by the Committee, due consideration would be had for the situation of the persons spoken of. Their country was comparatively destitute of fond, although it furnished two of the largest counties in England, York shire and Lancashire, with large quantities of provisions; some consideration was therefore due the Irish labourers, when they came to this country in search of food.—(llear. ) The rich had been taken into consideration, and it had been said that the burden rolls heaviest on the agricultural inte rest. That was not to so for Lancashire, which was not county paid more in poor rates than seven counties, be ginning with Bedfordshire and corning down alphabeti cally ; and he believed that Manchester and Salford paid more than all the county of Bedford. Dr. LUSHINGTON was gratified that the Noble Lord (Althorp) had acceded to the motion, and he hoped some measure would be devised, if not to do away with, at all events, to equalise, the burdens. Mr. EWART corroborated the statement made by the Hon. Member for Oldham, and hoped that in any mea sure which might be introduced, care would be taken that the burden of supporting the I. ish poor should not fal with disproportionate severity on towns situate near the coast. Lord SANDON denied that the poor's rates fell more heavily on manufacturing towns than ea agricubural districts. Col. WOOD bore testimony to the great hardships sus tained by the industrious Irish who come over from time to time to labour in this country, and gave it as his opi• nion that the only way to alleviate their burdens would be, to place Irish paupers on the same footing with Eng lish and Scoth. The great evil of the present system was, th►t unfortunate Irish paupers were treated as va grants without having committed any acts of vagrancy. Lori DUNCANNON corroborated the view given of the great hardships sustained by the Irish poor, aad hoped that the measure which might be introduced, would ade quately provide for their relief, not only in this country, but on their being sent home to Ireland. Mr. H. GRATTAN thought the No►ale Lord opposite (Sandon) had touched the real point in this case, and he fully concurred with him on the necessity of the introduc tion of poor laws into Ireland. He hoped the committee would be so managed as not to introduce any feeling of asperity between the two countries. Mr. SLANEY felt glad that the Committee bad been appointed, thoubh he did not think much benefit would be derived from it.. The time was not far distant Mr. O'CONNELL said that the more Ireland was op pressed the more would she enforce her rights. No Par liament more deserved the hatred of Ireland than the present; it had done nothing for her, but everything against tier. The motion was agreed to, and a Select Committee appointed. THE CROWN LANDS. On the motion of Lord A LTHORP, the order of the day for taking into consideration the King's message rela tive to the better arrangement of the Woods and Forests, and Land Revenues of the Crown, was read. Mr. HARVEY then rose, and was left ,peaking. Mr. HALL DARE presented petitions from the Arch deacon and clergy of the archdeaconry of Essex, against the Irish Church Temporalities Bill. The petitioners distinctly petitioned against the reduction of the Irish Bishops, and they stated that any tax imposed exclusively upon tlic , clergy, without first obtaining their consent in convocation, was a direct violation of the Magna Charta. MESSAGE FROM THE KING. Lord ALTHORP brought up the following message from his Majesty ;-- " WILLIAM R. " His Majesty being desirous that an Inquiry should be made into the state and condition of the Woods, Forests, and Land Revenues belonging to the Crown, in order that the same may be rendered as beneficial and productive as possible, recom mends it to the House of Commons to take the subject of these Revenues into their early consideration, with a view to the adoption of the most effectual means for the attainment of this important object. " W. R." After a few observations from Mr. O'CONNELL and Mr. J. GrtaTTAst respecting the settlement of peasantry on commons in Ireland, which Lord Duncannon pro mised to inquire into, his Majesty's message was ap pointed to be taken into consideration to-morrow. CHURCH REFORM (IRELAND). Mr. LEFROY presented eighteen petitions from laymen of Carlow and aifferent other places, expressing the greatest objections if not to all, to the greater part of the provisions of the Irish Church Reform Bill ; also four petitions from the clergy of Dromore and two other dioceses in Ireland, and from an Archbishop and the Bishops of the Church of Ireland. He particularly called the attention of the House to this petition, but would not dwell upon it at any length, as he should, he hoped, in the course cf the debate, have an opportunity of referring to it. Colonel GREY wished to ask the Hon. Member whe ther he knew, from his own personal knowledge, that the persons who signed those petitions were resident at the places from whence the petitions purported to come ? Mr. LEFROY could not, from his own personal know ledge, undertake to answer the interrogatory of the Gal lant Member, as regarded all the individuals who had signed the petition, all the names he was acquainted with that were fixed to the petition be knew to be resident. Lord STORMONT presented a petition from the Dean and Chapter of Norwich against the Irish Church Rtform Bill. _ _ Lord ASHLEY presented a petition from the Dean and Prebendary of Dorset, against the Irish Church Re• form Bill. Mr. W. DUNCOMBE presented similar petitions from the Archdeacon and Diocese of Raghfin. Mr. SHAW presented several petitions from the Arch deacon and clergy , of St. Paul's parish, Cork, from the Archdeacon and clergy of Clogher and Kildare. IRISH CHURCH REFORM BILL. On Lord ALTHORP moving the order of the day for the second reading of the Irish Church Temporalities Bill, Mr. GOULBURN considered that it was the duty and habit of the House to have a clear and distinct message from the Crown, before it attempted to deal with any re venues belonging to it. The Noble Lord, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, and as sworn to protect the revenues of the Crown, ought not to press forward a Bill of this description without a preliminary message from the Crown. For the House of Commons to invade the revenues of the Crown without such a message, was a violation of the principles of the Constitution. Sir R. INGLIS expressed his concurrence in the senti ments of his Right Hon. Friend. Mr. HUME suggested that some plan should be adopt ed of embodying the rules and orders of the House in a distinct and intelligible shape, so that every Member might be able, without difficulty, to make himself acquainted with them, instead of trusting to the research and expe• rience of one or two particular Members. Mr. M. ATTWOOD said the 13111 was based upon an assertion which was totally unfounded. The preamble stated that his Majesty bad been pleased to signify his intention to place at the disposal of Parliament his inte rest in certain archbishoprics and bishoprics, whereas, his Majesty bad been graciously pleased to do no such thing. Mr. STANLEY said, it was true that there had beer. no specific messa:e from his i\l jesty on this particular provision of the Bill now referred to, but it was equally manifest that in the speech from the throne, and in the subsequent recommendation to that House, a general authority was given by his Majesty to the principle of the 13111. It might, perhaps, be expedient that, before the House came to the consideration of the specific clause, a more distinct message should come down in reference to it. Upon this he offered no opinion ; but, however that might be, he did not think there was any thing in the case to vitiate what had already been done, or to preclude the House from proceeding with the second reading. He could not help remarking that this second objection, after such a lapse of time, upon a mere point of form, conveyer the idea that there might be considerable reluctance on the part of the opponents of the Bill to deal with its sub stance.—(Loud cheers from both sides of the House.) Sir It PEEL said that the Noble Lord must know as well as be did that there ought to have been the same message with regard to this Bill as there had been thi , evening with regard to the Woods and Forests. Lord J. RUSSELL observed that there was no more necessity for a specific message before the second than before the first reading. Mr. O'CONNELL said that the King had signified in three different ways his sanction of the Bill—first, in :he speech from the throne—next, in his recommendatien to that House—and, thirdly, by the circumstance of the measure being brought forward by his Chancellor of toe Exchequer. Mr. C. FERGUSSON said tliat if this objection were valid, a great deal of time must be lost, because it would be necessity to begin again.—(Cries of " No, no.") Mr. SHAW said that it was wrong that the Bill should have been read a first time without the neeessa, v message, but th .t was the fault of those who brought the measure forward and not of the House. The order of the day was then read. Lord ALTHORP moved the second reading of the MI. Mr. GOULBURN reiterated his objection to the pro ceeding, and said that the precedent might he used h. r• - atter to deprive the King of his remaining rights. The SPEAKER said, if the House considered that there had been a sufficient sanction for the first reading, te. /7 9 j/7a,.91r() n fns opinion there was also a .01. lent sanction for the nond ; but if there were sufficient for bmh, still it did e e follow that there was sufficient for the ileuee to deal ith the Bill in Committee. Mr. C. W. WYNN expressed a hope that the over sight would be remedied Wore the House went into Committee. Mr. F. SHAW would acknowledge his approval of the abolition of the vestry cess, and if he made any complaint in this respect, it was to the manner in which the change was to be effected, rather than to the change itself. The proposed augmentation of small livings, the required re sidence of the clergy, and the abolition of pluralities, he also fully approved. So far be was not only willing, but he felt anxious to give his support to the Bill. But there were two principles involved in it which he could not accede to. The first (as we understood the Hun. Mem ber), the abdication of the perpetuity of the purcha-e money, which would have the effect of lowering the at thority of the church, and crippling its energies. The point related, in his opinion, to property in general, for if it was once admitted that an interference in church property was just and desirable, the tenure of all other property whatsorrer would from that moment be inse cure. He highly disapprov e d of the constitution of the Board authorized by this Bill. The main object of the Bill seemed to be to effect a reduction in the number of Bishops, and against that object he must enter his warmest protest. lie knew that it was said to be abso lutely necessary to reduce the vestry cese, and that it was asked where a substitute could be ferind for that? His answer was, that he though t lie could provide a substitute without reducing the number of the Bishops, and he should propose, as an alternative which' was less objectionable, that the incomes of the Bishops, not their number, should be reduced. The incomes of the Bishops amounted at present to about 130,0001. a-year. Now suppose, instead of paying them their present amount of income, the payment Was made to twenty Bishops at the rate of 4,0001. a year each, and to two Archbishops at the rate of 6,000/. each. If this were done, the diffi culty he had referred to would be fully met, at the same time that the evil of the reduction of the number of the Bishops would have been avoided. Then again it was proposed to reduce the number of the beneficed clergy. There were 2,000 beneficed clergymen in Ireland, among whom an income of 500,00 W. was divided. That rave an average_ income to each of the 2,000 persons of 250/. a-year each. At present the money was spent in Ireland by individuals residing in every different part of the coun try, and the benefit of that expenditure was equally dif fused over the whole of the island. Would the country be benefitted by taking away from any considerable number of these persons the means of living in Ireland ? He knew that the object of the lion. Member for Middlesex (turn ing to Mr. flume) was to destroy the Bishops. If that object could be effected, the Hon. Member would be con tent. If the lion. Member could only displace tea of the Bishops, be would he so far satisfied. Perhaps, too, the Hon. Member would not object to effect another object of a similar kind ; awl he and the Hart. Member for Oldham who set near him, would perhaps like to see 20 corone s joined with these 10 mitres. They would be pleased to put them all into the mortar of popular opinion, and bray them there with the pestle, which no doubt the Hon. Member for Middlesex would use secuntimin artem.—( A laugh.) lie confessed that he should not like to leave the church or the Nobility to the tender mercies of the Hon. Member. He hoped that this Bill was not introduced to satisfy the vehement desire for economy now prevalent through the country. Ile thought the Bill in every respect most mis chievous, and should therefore move as an amendment that it be read a second time this day six months. Mr. ESTCOURT legged leave to second this amend ment, and he did so most cordially. If the church cess were taken off, it would be imposed upon the tenant for the benefit of the landlord, who now received less rent than he otherwise would do, on account of the cess. If that fund were now to be taken from the church, and to to, as it would, into the pockets of the owners of the soil, he should much object to the change, for he should con sider it as an application of church funds to secular pur poses. He opposed the reduction of the number of Irish Bishops, because he was certain that it could not take place w.thout serious injury to the church. He believed the number of Bishops required in Ireland was beyond that required in England, because of the greater necessity of the clergy having frequent recourse to the spiritual direction of their superiors. These were two observe° tions with regard to this part of the Bill; as to the othi r part of it—that of the proposed taxation of benefices—he must say that he thought that taxation began too low, for it began upon an income of 2001. a year, and every one must be aware that no man upon such an income as that could do more than barely maintain a respectableatation in soriety; indeed I.e could hardly maintain such a station as the nature of his office required. Besides this, when the tax was once imposed it was always to be levied, and it was to be levied regularly every half year, without considering that in some cases the clergy would nut be paid their tithes, and that the amount of their receipts, even when they were paid, would tie subject to considerable variatior. To enforce the regular payment of the tax under such cit.,. cumstances, would be most injurious. It would be Into injurious not only to the individual, but to the church. lie looked upon this Bill as calculated to inflict a direct injury upon the church of Ireland, and therefore as like wise calculated, through the same means, to injure the in terests of the English church. Mr. PLUMPTLIE spoke in a low tone, and was under stood in the outset to object to the removal of Bishops front one see to another: the only translation to which a Bishop should be subject, in his opinion, was a translation from this world to the next.—(Hear.) At the same time, he disapproved of several parts of the Bill, and could not vote for the second reading, unless Ministers could give a satisfactory explanation of the point which related to the division of church property. Mr. STANLEY could not hold out any expectation that Ministers would concede points in the Committee which would make the approach of the opposite parties much nearer; but he thought he could give some explana tions which would at least have their weight with th 6 lion. Member for Kent. All seemed agreed as to thu merits of some portion of the plan ; and she Hon. Mem ber for the University of Dublin, with creditable candour, had admitted that he should not have objected to the Bill so much, had it been brought forward by his friends in stead of his enemies. "The measure (said he) is good in itself; and, if introduced on this side of the House, it should have had my cordial support ; but because you— the Ministers—are always wrong, even thaugh in this in stance you have blundered upon a benefit, and stumbled on a virtue unawares,' I will oppose your plan, and will move that your Bill be read a second time on this day six months."—(Cheers and laughter.) There was no answering an argument of this kind ; but lie (Mr. Stanley) would try if he could not gain a little on the Hun. Member, by taking upon himself the main responsibility. The Hon. Member had admitted that he (Mr. Stanley) was friendly to the Church, and did not mean in any Ivey to endanger its stability. Now, in framing the Bill, as Secretary for Ireland, he had taken a principal share ; so that, upon the confession of the Member, the measure proceeded from one who was a sin cere friend to the church. Let the House observe ~14, points on which they differed, and those on which they agreed, arid sufficient discordance could not be found to justify the opposition tat the second reading, Fitst, he would ask the warmest and most devoted sticklers for the property, the privileges, nay, the prejudices of the church, was it friendly or safe to that church to say, " There may he, and indeed there are, gross abuses in it—this Bill goes to correct them—l agree in the evils and in the cessity for a remedy, yet at this time of day, and in the present state of public feeling, I will not adopt the re medy, but leave the church to stand or fall by its own abuses ?"—(Hear.) He pre the Hon. Member fur Dublin credit for sincerity, but certainly not in this in stane- for poli , ical sagacity or practical wisdom. All the real friends of the liish Church would be ready to toek its abuses boldly and honestly in the face, and to retreat from a point no longer tenable, in order to talcs up a posi tion where a stand against its enemies might be securely made.—(Hear, hear.) The Hon. Gentleman agreed that the Li gislature could not stand still—that there was much to retne tat, and among other things, that the vestry cess must be abolished ; yet if there were a part of the Bill which must be treated with deli cacy, because it trenched upon church property, it was that which related to the vestry ass. In the same way the Honourable Member did not object to the augmentation of small livings—to enforcing 'he residence of the clergy—to facilitating the dissolution of unions, or to the increase of the funds for the buileiag and rep iir of ecclesiastical edifices; and although it was apparent from hence how nearly the friends and opponents of the Bill approximated, the Hon. Member came to the curious resolve of attempting no improvement of the system, and of throwing out the Bill altogether. He would most ad vert to three points noticed by lion. Gemlernen who Mail preceded him, and the first of these related to perp etuiti,-e. He agreed that it was not desirable that the property of the church should be devoted even by Pa, iianent t other than vcc:esiastical purpose., but then arose the question, how Ministers proposed to deal with the preperty of the church? in what situation did the leases of Bi.hops e•and with relation to the sup reme authorit y of the seee, the an d rights of the tenants ? A lii- p riwgb ": y e _ orn o f E t e lo'ew yeaec,rheurder:hb.y; Act of Parliament to g ran t l eases for twenty-out and no longer ; bait the fact was, epp, 1 „, will be deposited in his box, and Kept uI Iv " 1 ' retur n , r , vv A 4,..,94k t ,„ or! x THE AUTHOR OF DARNLEY. MARYu 3 vols. post Svo., price 31s. 6d. bds., / °f BURGUNDY; or, the Revolt 1 , • e of of Ghent. Dl kitmkeZ4eor he " .‘ Henry Masterton," best i aL tt eoik at k r..ja i i ta ne t: l,n calling this de c i ded ly Tiy the e i.y a v n eg i x . L i Z el l 81 LitaitieTX 1 2Literary Gazette. / I.ltb g r°o , Rees, Orm e , Brown, Green, and Co. s r e 14 1 d Month of May will be published, s ° o `hs t. 110 U N R E ICAL MEMOIRS of the . 4 s , t Ti of RUSSELL; from the Norman . Con- F, I • 4 's s 'Q '" WIFFEN, Author of a Translation of (1 5 llop u e b ru ,. Bll ernme Liberata," &c. &c. With . much tl 5 0 I Ats,,VIII ` l ' h ed Correspondence, from the reign of IS 5,,° tvki te that of George 111. inclusive; with „, 5 0 0 L °4 o7, ri ngs, Plates, and Portraits . 2 vols. Bvo. 1 9 t 's7 °4 o ; tn r Y* al N r.,' ° °glnan, Rees, Orme, and Co., Paternoster- i‘ ir 4 ,a r 1 1 0 l o g • Penter and Son, Old Bond -street. 9 „ o N 4 / 1 THE VERGE OF SOUTHAMPTON 414 . Al`tß AND THE NEW FOREST. l ary A ,„ PACT COTTAGE, WITH CHAISE- I „ tin:fe* goe LAN . ST ABLE, AND ABOUT TEN ACRES a 0 0 0 fi 6 oe At g ir ? SOLD BY AUCTION, t a WINSTANLEY and SONS, italra 0 ,,„ 11 TUESDAY, May 21, at Twelve, by direr- I 01, 4 Lit i.rocecutors of Mr. Hepworth, deceased, a °°‘ S TATE comprises a neat BRICK 11,1 511 NIT -1,214,._-• and SLATED COTTAGE DWEL- „ ; 1 4 , p to 7 ll tly situate on the verge . of the road from I flied '4L t o Fawley and Beaullieu, through Hyde, criPsk %714 ; :, views of the Southampton W ater, and in tiltre vicinity of the New Forest. . The house 1 Pef ,et Va litt;N *i t ," Parlours, four bed-rooms, kitchens, and !i t Nth" detached wash-house, a large brick built , rf• ~Ot• 'tie%) ehaise-house stable, cow-house, hen-house, 6 t 01 k .; th;" e ,, ttel ose d 0 0,1 O• th yard, andthe adjoining parcels of 0 P I , tl i ` p 4 .0 e comprising near ten acres. The pro -8 0 kt k i_k ttti , Y freehold and partly leasehold ; one portion rah h eld for 9,999 years and the other portion ' . 11 ) both • A , 1, 1 , 1 , 44 at nominal rents. '' . 5 0 2, 4 14 ) 1tc, „, t .bY applying to Mr. Wm. Etheridge, auc ' " f whom printed particulars may 0! I , at hrtie u i e ' ° 0/. ; are also at the Inns at Hythe and South , p i blesses , Oli ver son, Denbie, and Lavie, So " 1/ h .' 44 n :tick's-place, Old Jewry, L . ndon ;at the •"' Winstanley and Sons, Paternoster row. • /, AO . ; CpYEp i'uCCEDANEUIII FOR FILLING DE -, e l S E TH, without Heat or Pressure, and IN 'or L ut- E ARTIFICIAL TEETH, without l/Ni t uer Ligatures 4 1 A_ A EUR MALAN and SONS, Sor t,' A No c , „T, b "entists, No. 32, GREAT RUSSELL 00' ;,tttol` b'', I • O OIIISBURY, and 9, HALF-MOON igt'So►eixtt'4CADlL.LY, grateful . for the high and bth !a l i o Wa ge Which has so eminently distinguished ..h I. , 0 „1°1 '1„ °el exertions since their arrival in the Bran t r e e t :Pectfully announce to their Friends and the 01 oral, that they still continue to restore DE tlt'ctia -r 4TH, with their celebrated MINERAL eft E _,lN, so universally recommended . by the i pe tfat t . uni . and Paris. The operation of Filling o tl t, in a few seconds, without the slightest o gr od a a' pressure. They also FASTEN LOOSE ok h i nanner singularly efficacious, and SUPPLY . 1% 4t NNeo,'ARTIAL SETS of TEETH formed of the ' ° "tt ilei t k' i tODlßLE MINERAL, or of Natural Sub ," t c: s to . 40 " , :et WIRE or other LlGATURES—guarni_ er ever 04 4 :4, Ch ar y purpose for Articulating and Masti- P„, ges as in Paris. 0 04 II': t rra rtY are respectfully invited to witness the suc le 0 t of the Mineral Succedaneum. J• 9 10 //1 kis.SlP of the above fi rm may be consulted Mon °ClO 44 )1, TI %tr r I e l ur klays, for a short period, at Mrs. Short's, Great Yarmouth ; and the intermediate oi ° o 'utchfield's, Al ar k e t-pl ace , N orw i c h. 1 5 5 0 4 0i Charges as in Paris. Ig c n i tt 45 " 4 410 00 JOHNSON'S AMERICAN 'RING SYRUP, FOR CHILDREN CUT kotiALLIR TEETH. This infallible remedy has ke til l 11* i t w indreds of Children, when thought p ast re . 4 NO% tit 4 Convulsions arising from painful dentition. As ti: ° ;o IC :4,7 Syrup is rubbed en the Gums the C hild will be I /7 l' t •Zt 4 °,e Gums cooled, and the in fl ammation reduced. Iti t 'kiri,l 4 nocent as e ffi cacious, tending to produce the NI A, ' t t ot t 7 ease ; and so pleasant, that no Child will re fl./0 Its Gums he rubbed with it. When Infants 4 y r t t lle of four months, the Syrup should be rubbed Ile.° 5 and Parents should never he without the Cl at h the ' „ nursery where there are young Children; r o d vo o ,,ro i ,''. wakes in the night with pains in the Gums, 1 titi t u lti o r ii bmediatel gives ease • thereby preventing 9 tis t .So t ,' l evens , & c. Y The great ' success of this Medi oo 7 t he last Twenty-five Years has induced un qill,"%threr"na to imitate - it, under the name of Ameri . . t :o t s b l Ol., A. YruP, and copying parts of Mrs. Johnson's 8 5 t1‘1% (\ 41. ,""1t5 will, therefore, be very particular to ask s trti neti r : v4l S AMERICAN SOOTHING SYRUP, ta' - ) : 4 1111 0 ,, that the Names of Barclay and Sons, 95, *rre'i'tpeteet, L on d on ( to w h om 11rs. Johnson has „ is on th e St am p affixed to each Bottle. .to.nf PROPOSED NEW LAW OF PATENTS FOR IN VENTIONS. AT A PRELIMINARY MEETING of GENTLEMEN intereste•l in the pending proceedings of Parliament on the LAW of PATENTS, held this day at the Museum of National Manufactures and of the Mechanical Arts, No. 28, Leicester-square, It was resolved To invite to a PUBLIC MEETING, to be held at this place, on THURSDAY next the 9th inst., at One o'clock precisely, such persons as fed an interest in the important subject of PATENT LAW, with the view of adopting such measures as may be deemed advisable for conveying to the Legislature the opinions of practical men on this extensively interesting object of legislation. By order of the Meeting, CHARLES TOPLIS, Hon. Secretary. No. 28, Leicester-square, May 6, 1833.