The Sun. — London, England, 1833-03-14 00:00:00

•(iw CE. ?. BD, fi l l . Joriss ° " . her for s br ' a :ol , n e legan t t he and t ae tier Let urer, at leaving ff w ag t, s e qually re Tf F 010507 ' The r , perBll ol° , - te , i rrjed a ied aec°Lite t 3ey coha u , I be, a' f the rite oii er ?d that th, pay,..r plain , ard , , f et i) 5' the u` . , ' mar ried inch, be ietiin s „ o rdi' "° g v ° o l ina rrY ' , s 3i r„; ar id aft er ' lied ' l id ca fif v siger J p!, ; bow ie. "II )er 15 29. chtistl e fel and th e ! r 0 the P ar 10 1/ ton toy b to Ue oog t .00 1 j id he s% • %f mybreskln a ny 4. rlig t he r` et to fin d WI „be P e li r 1, ted tb 3 , D but sta wbelbr :.• In' 1r kce 98. gi ri o ;; ° er 4 d T ye o°, oe t ! Id. • ,g cling% e ( ,t the s let, ng the f rj '. sheir be b e to lj ,,be, i t 111 1, 1, 0 ;, a. iforde d 3 N )014 -TRAcTSPOR RUNI, SUGA D R, WINE, COCOA, Ap Ab AND P.,'ACE. 'uALLOIN r T HE COMPTROLI ER FOR VIC SOME G AND TR ANSPORT SERVICES, RSET- MACE, MARCH 11, 1633. COMNII SSIONERS for EXE ;IHRALCILT theIIC.,. the OFFICE of LORD HIGH AD • ITNITPD KINGDOM of GREAT o and IRELAND d.. hereby give notice, that Ivinartlileibeil-,ll:::,:i,ei,p2plisytint,osrant, at ( >ne o'clock, they in t 4,_ re adY to treat with such Persons may be".! and delivering the following ford, , t ! 4 . 4) his :Majesty's V.ctuallin4 Stores at Dept— Quantity. The produce s tiG ''''''' 75,000 Gallons r of British ''''' moron s Possessions Ivl N2r l l n n t dies. e 4 la or T" . NvVe:i',.E.l3,roo Gallons COPl4l4lsAoGallons T heab ov :""" SO Tons 'Articles Abe delivered free of rEks z. ' duty. A ''' 50 0 Quarter s Si nlpf i rnPl '°/ the Suear may he seen at this Office ; but I Wn o f not het P et to be produced by Parti.R tendering, one bottle of sort of Wine, of not than_ P ct Pol 2 ttl i „ f Cocoa and' f not less than one quart of Okee etniitinne of the Contracts m iy he seen at . the said tiled, IC° Tender will be received atter One 1 ort,4l":47._o4nftttteittatry,hninlordauniy) noticed unless the . part r y ) e a n ttends, auth din writing. office, sod,C Tender. Inuit he delivered at the above d a 1 4tt e ,'' , for Wine and Cocoa must he accomPa" by &me at r‘addressed to the Secretary of the Admiralty,persons, and signed by two responsible 14 ro'" to htennte hound with the Person tendering, of 25/. a ^re o f r cent, on the value, for the due pe the per- Contract, I \ . hen to be delivered. One-half to he de livered by the 12th of April, and the remain der by the 3.)th of April next AR MY CONTRACTS. ~,,, N -s44I,IISSA RIAT IMPARTMENT, TREASURY (yric,,. CR AMILERS, MARCH 1, 1833. ei ti -' is hereby given to all Persons de 4fer threul of contracting to supplys the following Arti 1, e Use o f the Arm - • 4q 1 y, viz.- 41, BREAD, ig .' l , 4 to jelt Y'S Land Forces (the Foot Guards excepted) 134tio,„Tlents, Quarters, and Barracks, in the under t,t4d "4 Cots, and Islands I t ° 4 l l, 4iVi l d ig th Gloucester (includ- Northumberland (in_ r, 44erfnrde ingthecity of Br;s- eluding the town of lier•ick-on-Tweed) t k "ltlh t ri t t uciii ) tol) tnb rid , tio , g Hants Nottingham N t g e on Hereford Oxford ( : )N.,b , to w elt id- Hertford Rutland ntf 'Arlt et 4 a Hunts C ti .,t:r ) Salop Isle of Man Somerset t“i!i al (in e b„. Isle of Wight IStaflord N'Nt lad eluding Kent , cludln" "r" I V 4 1) 4 1 ' 1 tL (' tit4Y isl n Udin i(ex Fd S ) l 8 lk 'e (including Til-, bury Fort, in the county of Essex) Lancaster Leicester Lincoln Middlesex Monmouth Sufiblk Surrey Sussex Warwick Westmoreland Wilts Worcester York , 7 Ntl - I "ITlonilakmpton i ',N i ,„ ~?the several Counties in 'Sort i ti 'l , :t : , i l ' r u e islands of Alderney, Guerry V iti • e4 d to the Household Cava! lety . T o hl rt I N OATS, )3 7t, tpty'. Cavalry and Artillery Horses in Canton teMetl' 4• Quarters, in the under-mentioned Counties : ~, i 4 .41 4 iino„,„ Gloucester (includ. Nottingham „N, 'rlordl"Mg ing Bristol) 1 Oxford t„. 11 "N ' Hants and Isle of Rutland - bib. ( , i 'n , i l ll 4B e (inei Tiers ford Salop Somerset CA 'ltt ''' , lark t 'd- Hunts Staffbrd -RN - et) Kent (including Til. Suffolk ttt t , t ,.4ll Iler 4 14 4 bury Fort) Surrey besot ti Lancaster Sussex bo4 Leicester Warwick k:,S Lincol n Middle s ex Westmoreland Wilts Monmouth Worcester tfora Norfolk York Northampton North and South °ate Northumberland Wales. ,r ) Kay s FORAGE, viz., . _ an ~ t ti,, a „., 1 .,.. 1,,, b•iu Straw, to his Majesty's Cavalry and e r 'i c ,t l llt l 'A irrses in Barracks, in the under-mentioned p, ,. SOUth Britain :....- ,' A''l " Nottingham Kent tt,':t Lancaster Somerset 11 44, Middle-ex Suffolk Surrey Northampton 14 1 e 0 5 f k,1,1. 1din. t ,_ Northumberland (in. Sussex _ "41 R 1,,,. de eluding Berwick. Warwick /.1 . 4 11 1 , on-Tweed) York ti, , It th 41 the several Counties in North Britain. 11 p, 4 1 11Il ki 'lleeries are to commence on and for the Ist sealed 44,,, 41 in o , 3 i c n pt; that Proposals in writing Qt ,' kt th• e " " Tender for Army Supplies," will be re o',Cril ne ta x ,°:fi . ce en or before Wednesday, the 3d day p' t. k e ll th. ,` , . hut none will be received after Eleven 4 cIONI I '` la y. S „'la rit must be made separately for each , County . ' , 4 t ' ex , • North and a t W i cept for the Counties comprising , 114, 41,, ' l, rt, r ; lik ' all of which must be included in One t tli -1 ; 4 ,j'e the Islands of Alderney, Guernsey, and etio t t lel l ! ; 1180 the several Counties in North Britain ; 4511 4 to rr° P°sal must have the Letter wl_ri , ch er i_s tOf I the Tender properly filled up l ir P4 rte rlw „: Property engaging to become b b y ou t tl; with p 44 11' "'tin • the amount stated in the 4 ;I t tj '. 4 4 11 , 4'414r ; Or in the due Performance of the Con -4t 1, 444 l' -° P roposal will be noticed unless in mar ‘ l v e or o e n s eltic ti ttli • "der, and the prices expressed . 1 4,14 4 ,', 40 should it so happen that during the Ct ee - °f the troops should be supplied et, or th Contract no ttlitt4q and Bo "me, the Amount of the Stamps on the t : viii 1 ,( 1 , paid in the first instance by the Con rer,". P,,,, ' refunded to him. ftll e, %te d t, - ' who N• make Tenders arc particularly h.' ( b may Guards are not in t -ty, to he ) ‘erVe, that the Foot 41 ' 4 1' 4 ( 1 . ' 44 PPlied with Bread by the Contrac, and re. I °f ic 4 )' 4 i11 4 te 44 4 'wt to make use of any Forms . h_ut . those 'ltt o ,, - ', l, etv, ' li may be had upon applicatiodn at this .4 - "Tatt er s t he h of Ten and Four, an of the d 'k4. in 47:lands of Guernsey, Jersey, an 'l'q ilt t Tll_, l , v . : l ' AND ENTERED ON AT LADY ) DAY NEXT, E Per l '"a4o ° , 1 , 1(1 well-known Hotel and Posting -Ne P4t ielli ll E LION, WOLVERHAMPTON. A lar e u ., \v,4: l aPply (it by letter, post paid), to Mr. K. Is. 4, 184;erhampton. North and South Wales i Britain. sey, and Jersey. try in London and ONVp i° „Ns OF MRS. MARCET'S WORKS. ly it wh s : '` , I : B ATIONS on CHYMISTRY, ' ol. ll;:Plai t ,;,''' the El e m e nts of that Science ate fanii- Oavi: .°4 tio r :"' and illustrated by Experiments ; with °rl the Steam Engine. 2 vols. with En t l j s eQlp kV E st . ATIONS on VEGETABLE PHYSIO 141tiPpeelPrehending the Elements of Botany, with P I 4 k -e4 ion to Agriculture. 2 vols. with Engrav p 4 n . illsATioNs on NATURAL PHILOSO 51"NVp,'th 22 Engravings, 10s. 6d. -4 SATIONS on POLITICAL ECONOMY. Toll.llkriutt shed, by the same Aor, N O it ° PhllNS publi uth 'S NOTIONS on POLITICAL AR v t '• 12 mo . 4 s. 6d. c l ot h. 11 l V` IS ONS : STORIES for YOUNG CH .O IL- . I WINTER.; Vol. IL—STRING ; Ip' h4lf 7 01. IV. —AuTumN, nearly ready. gild, ;tit, ho und. 1"°,,,14,1 N ‘ I° l . CHILDREN, explaining the Manner of -4,,-4Aithe h• lf_bo u nd. `0 Rrnan. Reis , rine, Brown, Green, and Co. E NAY'S LAST POPULAR WORK. HIS e 1 8th Edition, price 41. -u ttiOt OjORIC A L and PRACTICAL Gen ar e ,It !: 1 1 1 1 4 t °n SYPHILIS and its CONSE- Nti,„ uti st i jsted by many extraordinary cases. To i p `A• kt ,: vractical Observations on Diseases of t e "ari k ', b ` 4l, on Nervous, General, and Local De- N thi:"Perior mode of treatment, the result of 11 ,) , Years' extensive and successful practice. r •,a COURTENAY, M.D., r i tu p ate i - street, F i t zro y- square , l a te of Robert krstr'rit,4lt th e street, Ad e l hi. the la, srew A uthor, and sold by Sherwood and Co.; oWhyn, 4, Caihrinestreet, Strand ; talt: 4 "Ls treet ; Ch a p pe ll, 59, P a ll- ma ll ; Su )s,l.* : t j'et, Edinburgh ; and all Booksellers. I , , , CleTt i li i ßTL N ,) . ?? , als o may be had, %, 1 of celebrated TREATISE on . :I,utes q t r Ai e URETHRA and RECTUM, in L,L i t t .Y ' r um ten to twenty years' duration ‘ri t, or.eLy full cured in a few weeks, and its supe. f t he IY established, being the Twenty.first F r , e e a t anci Y Cte iee+ ivrl t %s:l _p - 4 of these diseases, together wit we er a , pist excesses, entitle these t ro n rks . to ~kierltilvl,triVier_e.scaactuyratnhy r in ec o o r T li n t i y e . r , i , d_a i o nsp , e t e n toi r . ~..Pl),lcatioll, anto d „" th, t hol t Nt'a ' t l u kh eq. opinion of Dr Courtenav's ro.. 4 ve t , a te hirn ou his successful andluctpicifu" es' and often fatal diseases."—European (No. 12,039.) LONDON, THURSDAY EVENING, MARCH 14. 1833. BRITISH INS"! ITU I lON, PALL-MALL. THE GALLERY for the EXHIBITION awl SALE of the WORKS of BRITISH AR TISTS is Open Daily from Ten in the Morning till Five in the Evening. _ . ASSIZE INIELLIGENCE. developed transactions which called for a further inquiry elsewhere. Mr. POLLOCK proceeded to read the letters, one set of which was addressed to Mr. Graham, who had been the attorney of the plaintiff during the election, but who now acted for the defendant. The other set were from the plaintiff to the defendant. One of the for, er stated some doubts about his (Mr. Bayntun's) qualification being perfected, but begged Mr. Graham to keep that to . him• self, and that at all events, he (Mr. Bayntun) would take the oaths and his seat. Another s iid he had already received about 30 applications for pl ces, and wihed to know hots they must be answered, and stating that lie had not yet decided which side of politics it would he most convenient for him to take. Nearly or quite a 1 of them were upo❑ the subject of paying the expenses of the election, and for putting off the day of reckoning till a rather more convenient season. Those to Mr. Cattle ex pressed the warmest gratitude and thanks for his valuable assistance; spoke of remitting money, and the very last mentioned the deiit still due to the defen Cant. The Learned JUDGE could not reprobate these transac tions in laneuage too strong. The ques•ions he should leave to the Jury were,—first, did Cattle di•burse all the money he received, or was there a balance due ? secondly, was any part of the money applied to unlawful purposes ; and if so, was the plaintiff privy to it ? If he was, he could not recover, though there even might be a balance ; and he warned the people of York to lock well to themselves, or i , was probable that a further inquiry into these trans actions might deprive them all of their franchise together. He then proceeded to di•cuss the evidence, after which The Jury retired for some time, and returned with a verdict for the defendant, adding—. We find that Mr. Cattle received and disbursed the money, and that the money was given for an illegal purpose, with the know ledge of Mr. Bayntun." NORTHERN CIRCUIT.—YORK, .111.1.ncfr 11. BAYNTUN V. CATTLE. Mr. Sereeant JUNES stated the case. The plaintiff is Admissinn lc.— Catalogue Is. WILLIAM BARNARD, Keeper. now Member of Parlisment for the city of York, and this is the third Parliament in which he has sat for the city. He is the son of a wealthy clergyman at Devizes, anti was a Ca , .tain in the Ist Regiment of Guards, called the King's Own, and being quartered at York, and having made himseif very sgreesble to the inhabitants, us as invited to stand as a candidate for the city at the election in the HIGHLAND SOCIETY OF LONDON. ALGENERAL COURT of this CORPO RATION to ceb-hrate the ANNIVERSARY of the VICTORY of ALEXANDRIA, will be held at the Freemason's Tavern, on THURSDAY, the 21st inst., at 5 o'clock, Dinner at 6 o'clock precisely. The Right Hon. Sir GEORGE MURRAY, G.C.TI., summer of 1830. Mr. Bayntun knew little about elec ti , neering matters, but he was &rare that funds to a cer tain extent would be required, and the sum of 7,603/. 5... sd. was placed at the disposil of the defendant Cattle, for the purposes of the contest. The way in which this money was disposed of would form the present inquiry; there would be no th uht hot it would be very readily tr.e. , (l into the hands of Mr. Carle, and he must discharge him self f o'n it as he could. The Learned Sirgeant then Presid , nt. in rh•• Chair. Members are r, quested to appear in the Highland Garb or in Unifortn. Visiters to lie introduced by Members, hut M. mhers of the Highland S ciety of Scotland, and of the branch Socie.ies of Madras, Bombay, Aberdeen, or Canada, are admissible without introduction. Tickets, One Guinea each, may be procured at the Tavern. proceeded to state some of the items which formed the account of the disbursements of the defendant,. J. MACDONALD, Secretary. who, during both t , ,e first and the second election was the treasurer of Mr. Bayntun's committee, but in the third had deserted him, and gone over to the other party. Boside the amount before mentioned, credit was riven in the account to Captain Bayntun for a sum of THE GENERAL STEAM NAVIGA TION CONIPANY'S PACKETS leave LONDON For HAMBU G, with his Majesty's Mails, every Wednesday and Saturday early in the Morning. For ROTTERDAM, with his Maject,y's Mails, every Wednes day and Saturday Morning, at Seven o'clock precisely. For OSTEND, every Saturday Morning. For CALAIS, every Sunday Morning. For RAMSGATE, every Saturday Morning, at Half-past Eight o'clock precisely, from St. Katharine's Wharf. Fur Freight, apply to Mr. Norman, Agent, No. 1, Wa ter-lane, Tower-street; and for Berths at this Office. In- formation may also be had at 56, Haymarket. N.B. Passengers going to Hamburg are requested to be on board early on Tuesday and Friday Evenings' Powerful Steam-packets for Towing and Excursions. CHARLES BESSELL, Secretary. General Steam Navigation Company's Office, 500/. subsequently remitted to the defendant, making in the whole, in round numbers, 8,1041. On the other side of the account were payments of the most extraordinary kind, in large lumping sums, without he specification of any items whatever, and no vouchers that they had been paid was ever produced beyond the account which the defendant himself had rendered. A large portion of the expenditure professed to be for the conveyance of outvoters from various places. For London the sum charged was 9921. 0,6 d. ; for Leeds, 2141. 15s. ; Hull, 602/. 9d. ; for Min- chester, 2701. 11s. Bd. ; Sheffidd, 135/. ; for admitting freemen at Ymk, 3001.; to Mr. Graham, 700/. ; music, IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. 69, Lombard-street. 226/. 17s. ; 1,185 Chrisrmas-box , s, 1,1851. ; to several innkeepers, 1,0441. 2s. sd. ; wi , h various other items HOUSE OF LORDS, MARCH 13. FOR EDINBURGH. , a smaller amount, leaving, apparently, on the face of the account a balance of about 191. unaccounted for. The Learned Sergeant said, however, that he would show that no such sums as were charged were in reality paid. For instance, there were 102 London voters, which cave more than 91 per head. He would call a man who would swear that 71. only was paid. He would show similar overcharges in other cases ; and, having thus impeached the account, it would he for the defendant to discharge him.elf by showing that he had paid the money, or the plaintiff most have a verdict for the difference ; and he contended that he should he enabled thus to show that the balance in favour of the plaintiff in reality exceeded 4001. Lord KING presented a petition from Be anineter, praying for the immediate abolition of slavery. Lord SUFFIELD presented a petition to the same effect. The Earl of SEFTON presented a petition from a Protestant Dissenting congregation in Liverpool, praying for the removal of the disabilities under which the Jews laboured. THE LEITH AND LONDON NEW ST EAM-S IPS, ROYAL WILLIAM and ROYAL ADELAIDE, each 200 horse's power, having continued running during the Winter, are now appointed to sail from the St. Kitharine's Duck Wharf, London. and will land their Passengers, &c., in Leith Harbour, as Earl FITZWILLIAM (who this day took the oaths and his seat) presented petitions, for tie immediate aho• lition of slavery, from Kettering, B►•eworth, and several other places in the county of Northampton. The Bishop of BATH and WELLS presented a peti tion for the better observance of the Sa.libath, and pray. ing that stage-coaches and waggons might not be permit ted to travel on that day. The LORD CHANCELLOR presented a petition from Fowey, praying for the immediate abolition of slavery. The House then adjourned. follows : ROYA L ADELAIDE, JAS.] Saturday, March 16, at Ten, P.M. MILLS, Commander ROYAL WILLIAM,M NV- } Saturday, March 2.3, at Ten, P.M. CHAPLIN, Commander.— ROYAL ADELAIDE Saturday, March 30, at Ten, P.M. ROYAL WILLIAM Saturday, April 6, at Ten, P.M, And every following Saturday till further notice. FARES, INCLUDING PROVISIONS. First Cabin £4 4 0 Second Ditto - 10 0 John Wilson—Was a member of Mr. Baynturi'rs election committee in July and August, 1830. Mr. Price was chairman, and the defendant was treasurer. The free men of York were the electors then, out-voters as well as in. There were 102 from London ; their expenses on Carriages, Horses, and Goods, on Freight as usual. Information obtained, berths secured, and Goods re ceived for shipment, at the Leith and Glasgow Wharf. Also, by Thos. Robertson, 164, Strand ; H. Underwood, 56, Haymarket; M. Saunderson, Boar and Castle Inn, Ox ford-street ; Mr. Slark, OW White Horse Cellar, Picca dilly ; and Mr. Gilhert, Blossoms Inn, Lawrence-lane, Cheapside ; where light goods are received, and forwarded to the Wharf till Five o'clock on the day of starting. JOSEPH ADAMS, Agent, Leith and Glasgow Wharf. the road were paid in London by the committee there, and the sum that the defendant paid them for their return was 71. Witness saw some paid. He also saw two men from Hull paid 235., and another man 10s. The average amount of the whole timber apportioned upon the saw charged would be more than 31. 1,185 Christmas-boxes were given to as many voters, at 11. a piece, for their votes. The JUDGE said it was a highly penal action, and that HOUSE OF COMMONS, MARcH 13. The SPEAKER took the Chair at five o'clock. Sir JOHN BYNG brought up the Report of the Se lect Committee appointed to inquire into the validity of the return of Lord Arthur Marcus Cecil Hill, for the ho rough of Newry. They reported that las had been duly elected, and that the petition was neither frivolous nor vexatious. They also reported specially, that Lord A. Hill had not been guilty, during the late election for the borough of using cotrupt influence, yet the system of bribery ex isted to a considerable extent, and the Committee wished to direct the attention of the House, as it was understood in the gallery, to the evidence of two individuals upon the subject. The question was then put from the Chair that the minutes of the evidence be laid before the House.— Agreed to. The SPEAKER then said he had to acquaint the House that Mr. F. Barnard, who had petitioned against the return for the King's county, had not entered into his recognizinces, and the order for taking the petition into consideration was therefore discharged. lie had also to inform the House, that Col. Bruen, who had petitioned the House, complaining of the undue election for the county of Carlow, had not entered into his recognicances, and therefore the order for taking the peti tion into consideration should be discharged. He had further to acquaint the House that the Hon. Thomas French, who had petitioned the House against the return for the county of Galway, not having entered into his recognizances, the order for taking the petition into consi deration should be discharged. He bad further to ac quaint the House that Mr. Fryner, who had petitioned against the return for the borough of Sligo not having entered into his recognizances, the order for taking the petition into consideration should he discharged. Mr. H. G. VERNON moved for certain returns of all prisoners confined in prison for breaches of the laws of excise and customs, by the Justices of the Peace, in con sequence of the non-payment of penalties. Mr. ROBINSON presented a petition, signed by nearly 600 of the most influential and respectable inhabitants of Portsmouth, complaining of the close corporation of that town, which hitherto had had the uncontrolled ma nagement of all the fees and dues resulting from taxes on shipping, and which was under the in fluence only of a few individuals on whom the inhabitants of the town had no check whatever. This was one of the many specimens of the ill effects of close corpora ions in large towns. The borough con sisted of 50,000 inhabitants ; until a very recent period the corporation consisted (as we understood) of only 12 burgesses ; the corporation, with an instinctive sagacity which they det=erve , l great credit for, immediately on their becoming acquainted with the determination of the House to institute an inquiry into the subject of corporations, had admitted a n Jrnher of Burgesses to the number of 50. 'f he Corporation h td considerable sums of money in their hands, and although he was not instructed to state there had been any misappropriation, yet the inha bitants complained that they were shut out from all con trol over the very large 'undo which carne from time to time into the hands of the corporation. The petitioners prayed the House to institute an inquiry, into the corporation of that borough, in order that some control might be given to the inhabitants over the corporation, and that the election of Aldermen should be restricted to resident burgesses. the witness might or not ar:swer any questions which might implicate himself, for this case could not stop here. Witness said he did not pi) , the money; they got an order from the defendant, and they were paid in another room. Cross-examined—There were many expenses incurred ; York his always been an expensive place of contested elections till the last. The voters have to be conveyed ; they d ined and supped together, and took care to drink Mr. Bayntun'a health rather too much sometimes. They have to be talked to, and looked after, and canvassed, and a room provided for them. He did not know if the 6021. Bs. Od. included all the charges on account of the Hull voters. Thomas Smith—ls a freeman of York, and voted for Mr. 11 tyntun in 1830. He then resided in London, and came from London on purpose to vote. There was a man in London appointed by the London committee to pay their expenses down, and Cattle paid him 71. for expenses to go back. The money received from the London commit tee was only for expenses on the road, and did not include coach-hire, and the 71. was for witness to return back with ; but he never returned at all. James Smith—Voted for Mr. Bayntun in 1830. He come from Cherry Burton with four others from Thirsk and Driffield ; six others came from Beverley. Witness %as paid 30s. by Cattle. The outside coach fare was about 3s. He saw three others paid the same • Cross-examined—That is all I got. I saw two from Beverley and one from Cherry Burton paid. A man, named John Lawson, received 30a. John NY indswerth, secretary to the society of hell ringers in York, proved having received four guineas; they rang two sets of hells, ten in the cathedral, and eight in the church in Carey-street, twice a-day for eight days, and received four guineas by an order from Cattle, which he wrote in the street, and which was paid by his man at the coach•office. Cross-examined—The other candidates paid each the same sum. The bells rang for all the candidates jointly, and were very impartial. JUDGE-4 hope they did not split. Jai es Richardson—l acted for Mr. Petre in 1830. I know the scale of expenses allowed by his committee. The JUDGE —We can't shut our eves and suppose it is dark. The money was neither paid for coaches nor coach fares. It has nothing to do with it. Mr. Sergeant JONES—We did not pay it ; Cattle paid it. Robert Henry Anderson—l was agent to Mr. Petre in 1830. About 200 of the new freemen vo'ed for Mr, Petre, and the same,2oo voted for Dond is. They split their votes. I paid for Mr. Petre 4461. 4a. 91. for their freedom. Cloue_h examined—l went over the accounts my self. I became acquainted with the money that had been paid, and really did think that Cattle was as cautious as he could be. He always stood out to the last, and made the freemen take less than they wanted. I was never beftre engaged in a York e'ection, but was as much in that elec tion as any one. I talked with Mr. Bayntun about Cat tle's standing out with the freemen. At the latter end of the election Bayntun sa:d that Cattle was too cautious, he wished it to be done with more spirit, and said money was no object. He said f,equently they were not to mind expense. On the morning of the clo-e of the election, I told Bayntun that we were so safe that we might all go home and go to bed, for there were not votes enough left in all to pass him. He said Cattle was too niggardly, and he wished to be at the head of the poll, cost what it would. This was at 11 o'clock in the forenoon. This election did not coat so much as many contested elections in York by thousands. Bayntun was at the head of the poll by about 20 votes, and between 200 and 300 above the third candidate. By the JUDGE—He was well aware of the money having been paid for the freedoms. He never heard him mention the Christmas-boxes, but he knew well enough where the money went. He was often at the committee. Captain Bayntun knew that they had a man sitting in a back room of the committee to take up the freedoms of the men who came. All the committee knew it. Captain Bayntun said once, why did they not come up faster? and they told him they were making freemen as fast as they could. Mr. Pommel:, for the defendant, commented with great force and severity upon the conduct of the plaintiff, who had, for some reason or other, changed his plitics when he had abused the friendship of those Wm had assisted him, and now sought to take advantage of them by conduct which was disgusting to every honourable and honest mind. He said he was in possession of a number of the plaintiff's letters which exposed the whole case. He would show that the plaintiff had expressed the warmest grati tude to the defendant, and again and again acknowledged his great obligations to him, and it would plainly appear that on the very day on which the remittance of 5001. was made he acknowledged himself indebted to the defen dant. This would be an answer to the action, and would at once put him and all his professions of honour and honesty out of court together. The Learned JUDGE , ;aid the defendant must use his discretion as to the papers which he intended to produce. He well well knew that if unl,wful practices were fixed upon one, and the other participated in them, both were guilty, and he would warn them to take care of the conse quences, for he did not sit there to countenance gross and abominable practices to which no man could shut his eyes, and he should direct all the papers produced to be int. pounded. The ease could not stop here, and he had no wish now that it should be settled out of Court. It He (Mr. Robinson) was anxious to present the petition, because the subject matter to which it referred,was already under the consideration of the Municipal Committee. Be was not aware that the Hon. Member who represented the corporation would make any oppo , ition to the peti tion. He (Mr. Robinson) would not trouble the House with any remarks on the subject. The Committee had already commenced their inquiries, and he r•as only anxious to have the petition referred to them. Mr. ROBINSON moved for a return of all the Corn. w issionerm to the Customs and Excise who had been su perannuated from the year 1810 to the present period, stating their age, together with the amount of their sala ries, and the period for which they had received such ea :aries. Lord SANDON gave notice that to-morrow be would move that the Liverpool Corporation should be heard by counsel in the Committee appointed to inquire into the Liverpool bribery. Mr. O'CONNELL stated that the Solicitor-General had given notice of his intention to bring in a Bill for the abolition of fines and recoveries, in order to do away will. the litigious and expen,ive modes of assurance of estates in this country, but which, from its machinery, did not and could not apply to Ireland. And as there could be no reason why such a Bill should not be passed with respect to Ireland, he moved for leave to bring in a Bill of the same sort as regarded Ireland. He would only observe that he meant to adopt the Bill precisely which the Soli citor-General had brought in, with the exception of some of its details, to make it applicable to Ireland. Mr. W. PATTEN stated that as it seemed to be the general wish of the House that they should proceed with the Committee upon the Irish Reform Bill, be would not pi ess his motion, of which he gave notice for to day, but be could not avoid saying be was extremely anxious to bring it forward as early as possible. He had been accused by letters from all parts of the country of an intention, by this motion, to throw out the Factory Bill, brought in by his Noble Friend the Member for Dorset, but he could assure the House and the public that his motion was in tended to have no such effect. The object was merely to afford individuals the opportunity of rebutting what they considered to be unfounded charges. He trusted he s hould be able to obtain an early opportunity of making his mo tion. Lard AL THORP moved tbat the order of the day r '• . \ , C TAtt,:k 44 :11 - s• • • , • t It, 4t l a tt e _ , 4k- 116,, - • ki `` -"`ox r f. : , li p . • — • , IMP‘ I 0 \ ,t 4 which waq ,he .trAinan, case. Lord ALTHORP bowed an assent. (PRICE 7D.) be read for the whole House going into a Committee on the Irish Disturbances Bill. Mr. WILKS hoped the Hon. Member (Mr. Patten) would not bring forward his motion, at a time when the House was likely to he taken by surprise. Mr. CUTLAR FERGUSSON suggested the propriety of postponing the discus4ion of part of one of the clauses a ,e Bill, which Lord Alrhorp agreed to. IRISH DISTURBANCES BILL. Lord ALT HORP, in moving that the Speaker leave the chair, observed that he wished to state that there were two points in the Bill in which Ministers intended to make alterations. The first was with respect to courternartial. Ministers were perfectly ready to say, that no person should be permitted to sit on courtsmartial, under the rink of captain.—(Cheers.) And secondly, that when he number of meinbere constituting the Court did not consist of more than seven, five should be required to agree on the verdict, and therefore if the courtmartial consisted of only five, the verdict must be unanimous— (Hear, hear)—and if the courtmartial consisted of seven, five must concur in the decision. The other po'nt W4B as to the dumiciliary visits. With respect to then, Mini.ters proposed that it should be sufficient when per sons in cffice visited houses, to call upon the peroons dwelling in the lit use to appear, and if they did so, that was sufficient,—doinz away with the power of enterne the house. The Noble Lord concluded by moving that the Speaker do now leave the chair. Mr. WARBURTON rose to ask the Nol4lo Lord whe- :her the commanding-officer would have the power of sending back the sentence of the courtmartial for revision, 1 11 r. O'CONNELL, in rising to move an amendment to the motion that the Speaker do leave the Chair, wished to call the attention of the House to that great principle of . . the Bill which involved the right of petitioning. He was not inclined to abandon any part of his _ . . . ovn opinion for the convenience of any Gentleman wHo was opposed to the principle of the Bill.— (Hear, bear, hear.) There had been a great majority against him on the reading of the Bill, and therefore he did not wish to put the House to any inconvenience, other wise he would have divided the House on the question that the Speaker should have leave to point out what part of the Bill should first he taken into consideration. But the question now assumed a very different appearance. It was one now of the very last importance—it was whe tiler lie!and was to be deprived of all her rights—whe• ther she was to be completely under a military dicta tion?—(Hear, hear.) It would, therefore, be his duty to take the erase of the House up in every ques thin that involved the principle. It was his intention to move that it be an instruction to the Committee that it w is the undoubted right of his Majesty's subjects in Ireland to meet for the purpose of petitioning the King and both Houses of Parliament. He particularly wished the House to understand he did not wish that any breach of the peace should be committed under that pretension. His only wish was to preserve to the people that which was their undoubted right and greatest privilege—the right of petitioning for redress of their grievances, leaving it to the Committee to provide such means as not to allow the provisions of !he Act to he evaded, but that the meeting should be for the bona fide purpose of petitioning the King, Lords, and Commons. That applied to the first clause of the Bill, which gave power to the Lord- Lieutenant to disperse or suppress any meeting for what ever purpose it had been held. It required no sanction— no oath—no evidence. It conferred upon the Lord-. Lieut. political infallibility. As to theassertions of the Noble Lord, they were (and he said it with no disrespect) perfectly ludicrous, about giving the power of a juror to a person merely because be had obtained the dignity of a captain. Really he thought that it could not be seriously intended. As to the concessions of the Noble Lord, they were of a most trivial nature, and he reminded the House of the sentiment the Bill must raise in Ireland—of the little at- tention shown in that House to the people of Ireland, and the indifference with which the rights and liberties of the Irish people were treated by them. If that course were a wise one, let them pursue it; but if it were not, be en treated them to pause before they drove the people to de spair. He would not trust himself with predicting what might arise, because it might be said that he w.Ja dictating ; but let it be remembered that Ireland had never been properly treated by England—that Ireland had derived no advantage from ker connexion with England.—(oh, ob.) He repeated that she had derived no advantage whatever, and he challeneed any man to show the contrary. He implored the House not to continue this system of mis government which had so long prevailed. He found in the spirit of the present Bill, the spirit of the former mis-management of Ireland—(Hear, hear.) The right of petitioning was one, the value of which was ne cessarily obvious to every one, and without that right of complaint it was impossible that the House could be acquainted with details of the operation of the laws. But if that right were necessary in England, it was infinitely more so that the people of Ireland should have the free and unbiassed right of petitioning, for a great deal of igno rance prevailed in the House relative to the real state of that country. There were gentlemen in the House who were willing to support the entire of this Bill, and the Government, with the miserable exceptions they had men tioned, were also willing to support the whole of it; so that to talk of these, he had a right to address himself, as if the Bill were to be passed in the form it now stood. To those who wished to support parts of the Bill only, he would address this argument, that they could not be certain of being in a majority in any one clause; but upon the ques tion of the right of petition, those opposed to it would certainly be in a minority. Supposing that the Bill passed in its present form, what would be the situation of the country from which the right of petition was to be taken ? The Habeas Corpus Act was to be suspended, and a constable, or any one the Lord Lieutenant might choose to appoint, would be able, in any district the Lord Lieutenant proclaimed disturbed, to imprison, in any place he thought proper, any one of the King's sub jects. Further, there were to be courtsmartial in which, in spite of the petty precautions of the Noble Lord, the greatest abuses might occur. In the year 1800 this tact occurred. A courtmirtial of five officers was sit ting to try a certain number of prisoners. The Judge- Advocate told them that there was no evidence against the men, but as they had been detained a considerable time, it would not be well to dismiss them without an admission of their guilt. The plan for proving this admission having been concealed, the prisoners, three in number, were called in, and told if they woul.l confess their guilt they would be pardoned. The plan succeeded, and the men, rather than stand their trial, acknowledged themselves guilty. The Court was then cleared, and i❑ spite of the agreement that was entered into, the met , were convicted, on the vote of duets out of the five officers, and transported. A gentleman had offered to prove this at the bar of the House, and he was one of the five that formed the courtmartial. Let Hon. Members recollect this circumstance, and that courtstnartial were to be established under this Bill. Farther, houses would still be searchable for arms or for strangers. The modifi cation proposed by the Noble Lord would be almost fruitless ; for, the tight of search existing for strangers, there would be no difficulty in making the allegation that the search was for another person who did not appear. The allegation would give the right of search, and the right of examining the sexes, than which none had been more abused ; for if there were an inquiry he could prove that officers, militia officers certainly, in exercising this right, had paraded no less than six naked women of one family before them, in order to ascertain that there were no men among them.—(Hrar.) Let the House recollect that this Bill was brought forward without inquiry, and indeed inquiry had been pertinaciously refn•ed,—that it had been brought forward without the trial of special commissions, which had always succeeded both in Englaud and Ireland, and had, on the contrary, been goading the people to outrage throughout the country, the police shooting them with impunity. It was in a country so si. tutted that they proposed to take away the right of petition—( Hear , hear, hear)—the only check the people of Ireland could have upon the tyrannical powers here given. He said this advisedly, for it must he remembered that the Bill gave indemnity for all ac's committed under its authority. Suppose a courtmartial guilty of the most atrocious tyranny and injustice—sup pose it to punish a man perfectly innocent—suppose it draw out a confession of guilt, knowing no evidence of it existed, upon a promise of pardon—no remedy could exist by action, or habeas corpus, and no means of causing the injustice to be known, except by tlw right of petition, now proposed to be completely taken away. except, indeed, in such cases as the Lord Lieutenant might choose to thinl. were such as to warrant him in allowing the parties to petition, and even that power of indulging was ISLE OF WIGHT. TO be LET.—One of the best frequented HOTELS in the Island, commanding beautiful sea views from sitting and bed-rooms, with a good Tap adjoining, also a large walled-in Garden with Quay in the front for patatengets and luggage to land, with a spacious Bali-room. where the yearly balls are held in the season. The above is free for wine, spirits, beer, tize., and pre sents an opportunity which seldom offers i❑ the Island of the most satisfactory kind to any persons commanding a few hundreds. Every information may be had by applying at No. 7, Q4een's.row, Pimlico, London; or Mr. Cooke, Medina Hotel, East Cowes (letters, post paid). Just puhlishetl, in 1 vol., price Ss., 1 1 IY VILLAGE, versus " OUR VIL LAGE." By T. CROFTON CROKER. (Uniform with) The ADVENTURES of BARNEY MAHONEY. By the sirhe Author. 1 vol. 8.. Second El , tion. " A very spirited volume, in which the ingenious author has depicted, with great truth, and abundant humour, the pecu. liarities, good and bad, of an ltishman of the lowest order."— Times. London, Fisher, Son, and Co. . Puhlishrd this day, the sth Edition, enlare.-ri t of DEL ARNOI'T'S ELEMENTS OF PHYSICS, or NATURAL PHILOSOPHY ; wuitten for universal use, in plain or non-technical lan- guge. Vol. I. (price 215.) has Treatises on Mechanics, Hy drostatics (with an account of the Floating Bed, lately contrived by Dr. Arnott for the relies of the bed-ridden), Pneumatic., Acousti,s, Animal Mechanics, &c. ; Vol. 11. Part 1 (price 10s. 6d.) on Heat, Light or Optics, &c. ; and Vn 1. 11. P trt 2 (to be pull shed in May, compl , ting the uoo.k) on El-etrieity. Magnetism, and Astronomy. " A schoolboy will read this work with as much avidity as if it were a treatise on witchcraft or legerdemain."—Times. "It is in Natural Philosophy what Locke's work is in Science of Mind."—London University Magazme. That useful and excellent work."—Sir J. Herschel. Loot .n: Lowman, Rests, Orme, Brown, GI e.-n, and Co. THE GAME OF WHIST. ELL'S LIFE IN LONDON of SUN DAY NEXT, will contain a RECAPITULA TION of the ANSWERS of the EDITOR on a vast va riety of QUESTIONS arising in the cour,e of playing t' e GAME of WHIST, which are not provided f r by HOYLE or MATHEWS, but which have been sanc tioned by the Clubs in London. These Decisions have been carefully revised by the best players, and will be found highly useful to the admirers of the Game among whom difficulties or disputes may arise. BELL'S LIFE IN LONDON will also contain No. V. of Lavater's Physiognomies of the Law, " THE FORE MAN OF THE JURY." " The Judge," " The Bar rister in Practice," " The Briefless Barrister," and " The Attorney," have already appeared ; and every department of the Legal Profession and its Adjuncts will follow in succession. The Sporting Department of BELL'S LIFE IN LONDON continues to be unexampled for its accuracy and extent of information. _ _ T6e Political and Miscellaneous contents of this Journal while stricly impartial, are not exceeded by any Journal in London, of which its long established and increasing popularity is the best proof. The price of BELL'S LIFE IN LONDON is seven pence. Published at No. 169, Strand, and to be had of all News Agents. INCORRODIBLE ARTIFICIAL TEETH FIXED WITHOUT WIRES OR OTHER LIGATURES, AND FILLING DECAYED TEETH WITH MI. NERAL SUCCEDANEUM. _ _ _ AA. ONSIEUR M ALLAN anti SONS, Sur geon Dantßts, No. 9, HALF MOON-STREET, PICCADILLY, and 32, GREAT RUSSELL-STREET, BLOOMSBURY, grateful for the high and EXTENSIVE PATRONAGE which has so eminently distinguished their ,fessional exertions since their arrival in the British Me-. t.tJpolis, beg leave to announce to their Friends and the Public in general, that they still CONTINUE to RE- S TORE DECAYED TEST H,with their CELEBRATE MINERAL SUCCEDANEUM, so universally D recom mended by the Faculty of London and Paris. The Ope ration is PERFORMED IN A FEW SECONDS, with out the SLIGHTEST PAIN, HEAT, or Pressure, and allays the most EXCRUCIATING PAIN , and lasting for many years; they also FASTEN LOOSE TEETH, WHETHER ARISING from AGE, NEGLEC I', or DISEASE in the GUMS. INCORRODIBLE MI NERAL and NATURAL TEETH, from one to a COM PLETE Set, which are INCAPABLE of DISCO LOUiIATION or CORROSION, and fixed without the iiicumbrance of Wires or any other LIGAIURES, and answer every PURPOSE of ARTICULATION and II A STICATION. —Charges LA in Paris. All Operations performed on the Teeth. ~ , 6 d . /_/ 1 N —/- V/If ` -- /6// 1,14 r d -to the pttition of a single individual.—( Hear.) / 13 , k this Bill the petitions were not t o b e pu bli s h e d —t h e ,sleaaons of petitioning not made known ; because, if two persons assembled together for the purpose of petitioning, it would be a meeting, and the aptboriti es wou ld b e at liberty to disperse it. lii : siatM; tisb•guestion was, whe ther any right of petitioning remained. This right of petitioning remained, that no individual might petition ; he would ask, whether the fair and constitutional wax.isf submitting grievances to the Legislature, his Majesty's MT:- jeers ought to have taken away ? Every body knew , that in order to have a petition brought forward of any wasp upon endeavouring s h n e e o d p o value at all, it was necessary to have it signed numerously grounded m em br u and respectably. How were petitions treated by the House that were got up in a hole-and-corner manner, and not numerously signed ? They were treated, as every person knew, with great disrespect. Bpt, no doubt, this wee e c n u n m ets e os n t acno o dn r v fairnession t c li e e r t , h box or other, kept from the party. The Honourable the importance of the right to petition was just to he estimated by ceded the act of petitioning. The House was not to for ienwHclO.)iulnshse that p r r e e d . e,et that the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland had the power to declare any past of Ireland in a state of disturbance. He had the power, by proclamation, and any person whom he chose to appoint had the power, to proclainsany part in a state of disturbance. If any two or Nitre petauns, therefore, met together, they were at once liable lei he proscribed. It was said that the power would he vested in discreet persons ; hut what confidence could there be even in his Majesty's Ministers, who would pro duce and carry through the House of Lords a Bill of this description ? This Bill necessarily gave encouragement to spies and informers—the basest of the human race—ne cessary instruments to discover guilt sometimes, but instru ments that ought never to be used, if possible to be avoided. Let the people hold meetings, for the purpose of peti. tinning to Parliament, and they put themselves at once into the hands of informers. If a private meeting ever was held, for the purpose of petitioning, an informer would only have to go before a courtmsrtial—say he was at that meeting —say that treason had been spoken, atol the parties attinding the meeting would be committer'„ The Bill, therefore, was a trap to encourage informera, and a trap to lead unwary persons into a state of proscri t tion. It was a mockery t . supper that there could be any freedom of petitioning without the public et ttlon of theft right. Was it not a desirable thing to have a publits die= cussion on that subject ? If there was misrepresentation if could then be corrected—if there was exaggeration it might he met—if there was falsehood it might he detected. He believed there was not a single right enjoyed by the British subject that was of more importance than the right of petitioning. Sure he was there was none that the English people would more unwillingly part with. The denial or that right had formed one of the ingredients of the revolution, and when he looked to the Bill of Flights; he saw it with much solemnify, recognised and enforced it 4 these words, " That it is the right of the subject to petition the King, and all comtnitments and orosecutions for such petitions are illegal."—(Hear.) That was part of the character of the Revolution, that was part of the titie of the Royal Family to sir on the throne. It was the most sacred right that tf e people could enjoy. Without that right oppression might pass with impunity, without that right public crimes could be committed with great safety, even in ordinary times, but when they armed the magistracy, the constabulary, and the soldiery of Ireland with the frightful powers of this Bill, they ought to mitigate them, by throwing the doors of petitioning wide op-n, and by giving to the Irish people the power at least of complaint. He had heard many Hon. Gentlemen, on the other side of the House declare that they would grant the extraordi nary powers now sought by Government, because they had confidence in Ministers, founded on their respenaibia lity to a Reformed Parliament. He admitted the respntl sibility of Ministers, but if the Ministers were responsible to a Reformed Parliament, what became of responsibility, if they denied to the people of Ireland the legitimate consti tutional mode of bringing their complaints, by petition, before the House ? He wished to direct particularly the attention of the House to this part of the Bill. The House would recollect that he confined himself entirely to peaceable and orderly petitioning for redress of grievances. He was not at present contend ing for the continued existence of any association—he was not contending for the existence of Political Unions. Po litical Unions had been very popular last year—they had obtained protection and praise, but it seemed they bad served their purpose, and they were new to be thrown overboard. He, howeve', was not at present contending for the exist ence of those political bodies—he confined himself to fairly assembled meetings, to petition for a redress of their grievances. All he required was, that when grievances were felt by persons, they should have the countenance of their more influential neighbours in coming together, discussing their grievances, and petitioning the Legislature. This was all he was contending for—it was a miserable remnant, a rag, of the British Constitution. It might be said that he ought to be voted against on account of the smallness of his demand ; but he could tike it, because if that right existed, despotism would not be complete. It had been said, if a free press were est iblished in Constantinople, an end would be put to the tyranny that reigned there; so, if the right of petition was still continued, the constitution of Constantinople would not be diffused into Ireland, and the steel of his Majes ty's Ministers would be blunted. Pandora's red box had been opened, but leave Ireland the right of petitioning, and hope would still remain. If the right of petitioning was taken away from England, could any one doubt that the breasts of Englishmen would flash with indignation at the adoption of such a course ? What cause, he would ask, bad been made out against the right of peti ioning? It was true that Whitefeet outrages had taken place,—that those outrages were continuing in consequence of the despair which the rumour of the Bill had produced ; but what had that to do with the right of petitioning ? Hots' were those cases connected with the right of petitioning ? The Whitefeet were not deprived of that right. There was, therefore, no case made against it. In the last summer there were many large meetings, one of the objects of which was to petition against the payment of tithes. Was that, he would ask, the case that was intended to be made nut against the right of petitioning? Hit was, he prayed the House to listen to a few statements. Not a single assault or violence of any nature had taken place at those meetings, and the moment a letter was sent from the Castle, signed by Wm. Cusack, that moment the meeting ceased. How stood the case ? All the persons who had attended there meetings bad been pros, cuted. What was more, every gentleman who had been prosecuted was convicted, with the exception, indeed, of those gentle men who traversed for the aasie of the county of Mayo. When they presented themselves in the dock, to take their trial, the Counsel for the Crown, addressing his Lord-hip ; said, " We will swear no jury ; we will i ffer no evidence; but let those gentlemen now depart from the Dock, that county, that province, being in a state of tranquil hey. But by this Bill the entire of that province was put upon the same level as those the most disturbed. If facts with respect to Ireland had any effect in that House, he would cite the case of a judge charging the jury upon the lightness of the calendar, where, in a county with 300,000 inhabitants, there were only seven teen prisoners for trial upon criminal cases. He would instance the case of a person, going about swearing the peasantry to join illegal societies, who was taken up by these very calumniated peasantry, and prosecuted by them. There was the county of Cork also in the same state of peace and quietude ; yet those four counties were to be deprived of the right of petitioning that House at the nod or caprice of the Lord Lieutenant. N iy, more ; a proclamation was not even necessary. An order might be issued in Dublin one day to prohibit a meet ing in Kerry, which might have taken place before the order arrived; yet every person who attended that meeting was to be guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing like it had ever taken place even in Algiers. What was the Lord Lieutenant's order ? Who could define it ? He could comprehend proclamations, because he had seen such a thing. He would respectfully ask, what bad taken place at any meeting in the county of Clare , that that count y should be put out of the pale of t h e law? Or wh a t h ad taken place at any meeting in th e counties of Limerick , Kerry, or Cork, that they shou ld be put n ut of the pale of the law ? Tee object`, in fact, was to create a Basher', and place the country under his military. He wished to know if a Reformed House of Commons would sanc•ion such a state of things? But it would lie sail that intim • matory language might be used. He would not attempt to defend himself from calumny, though calumnies had been heaped upon him from every quarter. If those ca lumnies tie true, they would doubtless have their proper effect; but if they were false, as he declared they were, they would have no effect whatever. Instead of o thu de priving him of the confidence and affection of the Irish people, those feelings would be increased. But the exisiing laws were strong enough to punish all infionmatory see . lan guage. At all events, the Government took care to d f o l with two of their own reporters, who were alwayirDset ra ely. sufficient. person who used it, the present laws instructions be • civility, E itler as and reg arded afforded th e the pu b I T rea a ti n o s nw o . f .fw, r u e: cr : h .r ai t amnpviym a g T , given He concluded, by moving, that t e •ich he had given notice. to the Committee o f .ve Ilr. F. O'CONN OR seconded the an endment. Lord ALTHORP was not quite sure whether, accor di ng to the ordinary practice of the House, the Hon. and Just ready, DOLPHIN N In 3 vols. post S vo. Richard Bentley, New Burlington-street. (Successor to Henry Colburn.)