The Sun. — London, England, 1833-04-18 00:00:00

646. ` 1 " re p O l 9 d , fine "' g enera tiO sb Fli nts e k, s dor N isrl o ' Rol i t le doing. 70i eagor' 00 f, over Pr ely bo e " graduallY of he import j '0 firks, 5 since " f t ter there • L i m erick , , to qu otatio ;ales of ssb! n d of N'` l n r! t , shiPp lc ' dc d are at ,, tales effec,i the handing; rerevrillg"w e demand sa l? t r pef blic esliseri for he till " le; so t, very se e , fi (lova!' t o ;seed Fiat 63 for sa le 'dy Y ,vere ld r•P 11 a dvane e : e the on"- stesai• rice at f u ll per. Ib'f67:l, )owing° 3g aal 1 ) r , 64. a ° , c o) fug Too .tion 9 .. Thl° tldi bite ) 1 " Late Ce icyr id . 6re , ,1 ' 1) is. m el 4i. 5 I.• r o , e o I° o 4/ • d ni 311 , 4 40" ti n' a 11 oo , 1 g tral° a 2bi.4li. t tr; ; 9 , 0.; il cher bigh' :;c lyC t ;s. 4. 441 1 4 2 51 4 ) d 2 18 91 is .`• .0' 0 tO -,4 4 , ,„ 5 4 . • 9 515 0 s t , (1 4 0 4d (4 1 ' _7s, 4 ( 3 ;. 1 6 6 oo — 1 n 6 I ll' cd 6 Bpri A ce `l 6 0 0 0 )5 0 6 0 1 9 0 0 I a I 1.- " to > l ri• 1 . 4 160 11 14 Jo tl 0 0 IS 0 0 0 17 ti lii ol?„„ 105 vi . '; r , e) . c to 3t g!' , P. • ) l e ni , klir l 0 ad e. 0' , i 0 f4l; o,i Id 0', 0 1 ,1 ' 0 er e col ° 0 1, ' ril 11 '0' 41 ( 1: J, c . 3l # ~,1 ki •-' o ._,' ki :1' ';',l I 5, ) 1 0 o 111 c 0" ir C' t be v ot 1 7 4 110 11 ' et i 0 .ith v a rir. :r -trV oo ds rolit' e It bi ttav o r ls!o ,t;sql'ight` l slit , ' • tP` Dritape t i i , rd ot Ve ir Jo — „roes ro c Rec° 00 1 . o .streeti sov e Pll 4 , f 6 r 1 : 41 ' Cra ce g • Wig° If' 11 01 I ,EsePt o do , rte / o' o„ o Or °I 4 ARMY CONTRACTS. COMMISSARIAT DEPARTMENT, TREASURI C HAMRF.RS, •PRIL 1. ISSS. N (Yr ICE is hereby given to all Persons de sirous of contracting to supply r, b• BEEF AND MUTTON, Is Majesty's Land Forces the Foot Guards excewerl), 14 Cantonnlents, Quarters, and Barracks, in the under b tnentiorwi c„ ~• .erk, ,„ ~ n les :.__ . , townoypaing the Essex (exclusive ofi,, , urrey ttiek. LingeM.rd) Tilbury Fort . North and South c,,i,,,,r4cluillni, GlouceNter(including Wales a city of Br stol) ), Th : f t the the are to commence on and for the lot 1 , jun ' next; that Propos:as in wri . ting . , sealed ssi_"(l lrnirked " Tender fir A rim Supplies' ' Nl : v ed at thi s b Office en or before Thursday, tbew2d'll day of all ih n , " , l d ' a ' v Ut none will be received after Eleven o'clock asd ',rat' Must he made separately for each , l County rid s , it it h r' l ' eXcept fo r the Counrieg comPli'lng ''' rt ' ' Berth Val 4, all of which most he included in Goe Tel; lan ' and ,i1(.11 Proposal must have the Letter which )er: 'la%, f it t ' the Tender properly filled up by two •Ivith th, part y property engaging to become hound • Pin to /,)' tendering in the amount stated l th t riet artirulara, for the due Performtnce of the , Con e on4 pri nw and no Proposal will be noticed unless made 41 4 ‘ 4 l l' "(lr, and the prices expressedw ord s tornintlgl'l and should it so happen that during' 1 h Yvi rts anc e qf the Contract no troops should be supplied un the (`A ttrae e t of the same, the Amount of the Stamp _ii- It 'ttf, r , 4 f ir l Rond, paid in the first instance by the Co N .R will be refunded to lsim. teti,il.4l,Persons who may make Tenders are particularly k's t " tf) obierve. that the Foot Guards are not in tol:v4l',l:l:l4ted:uPPlied with Meat by the Contract. r, re l . tt.t,k'', desired not to mak e use of any Forms but those upon application at thin w hich may li e had het which the hours of Ten and Four. th,EiST—INDIA HOUSE, Arum 17, 18:13. V IE COURT of DIRECTORS of the NLAII,N_ITED COMPANY of MERCHANTS cf d rs 0 , tl ti . tts , TRADIN G to t h e EAST INDIES, ThatuY give Millet., l l h. brie{ COURT of the said COMPANY 1 41., ~"'d at their Iluu. e i Leadenhall street. on TuE s- Sm. ‘" , 3otl • -0 „, il i te loh in the Evening, -‘1 . Instant, from iv :ne o'clock for the ELECTION . of a Dl oz '44 S L' ST ° /j f Ait th i; s E aid CO ve Nl ,,a P m A ed N . Y in the room I ril '9 I ).' E t T . ER AUBER, Secretary. LIFO EDINBURGH. b l'4 l. H AND LONDON NEW 'N I S . EA.11.8 IPS, ROYAL WILLIAM. having 'Nt, AbELAIDE, each 200 horse's power, h kiiV t'neing during the Waiter, are now a ppointed f: 1 " otill r i "' the St. K tharine'si Dock Wharf, L o ndon, i s 4" their Passengers, &c., in Leith Harbo ur , (1'14.ki,, 1.ttq,,qL14144.4.31, wlll Saturday, April 20, at Ten,'e.m. B)I,L,SVoi.:OAnITIT,d3r,cg: Saturday, April :27, at Ten, r. is. t4ttiLd INi ti z A; ( % ,l i er .... Saturday, May 4, at Ten, P.M. ' '''''''''''''''''' ' ',try follow-. ********************** till further notice. ?, -,, ,,t ~.„1,4„..!,3 INCLUDING PROVISIONS. '11:7 " UitlO... ************ .** ********************* itii„l,,dg" H0r5e5...,...a.n. *** ********** on Freight 4t)l'i'ihfro-;'Btiikipumonbttaineill, berths secured, and Goods t 11,, r4 4 ,. . L R, ,b,rt e n. , at t leLeith and Glasgow Wharf. Also, ~1 1 4.,e t ; m. sri ~ d1 64,, 0nS tra ß n ,, d ar ; a H mi U cas nd t e le rw l o n o n d ;.o s xa 6 ... , tlilly;t4t l Mr. ,„ S 4 l jn rk er Old ' White Horse Cellar, Pi l e . % t, (1 ' 4 1V 44 'ir . GII 4 h Y BIOS , OITIS Inn, Lawrence- a d n , • 11. % Irl .l . Nv 1:e re 1 i h r t %oods are received, and forwarded ' -4'4 4 till Fire o'clock t on the day of starting. JOSEPH ADAMS, Agent. .11;;',..„.„.„.........._ Leith an , ' Glasgow Wharf. ri0,,,,, i , small 8 , 0 ., price is, hoards, h AvE c s 2 o vo r ts.. IRISH GENTLE bN M AN in SEARCH L'th tor of ~. of a RELIGION; with Notes I. N 4 doa : , Captain Rock's Memoirs." kit,. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and t hbli eherl, •n 2 vole. po st Svo. price 21.. boards, 4 ', Ek.ris't 0 il 4t4kele of Otmery tin on Health, . .. Property, the Mind, it,il'h"'i°n*; with al B he Virtue, and Vices, the De ktittiZtill, : Longiaar, , Li:: txcellpnciea, ft Hu man Life. ll)i ti o ßees,Orme, Brown, Green, and ll Published, in 2 large vol., Syn., price I / . . v 1 , 0 0 1. : } 1). .4o ßy of the FRENCH RE ~ ,,t , t LUTION be t! lio rably of th e N ota bl es , i n 1789, t o th e Esta -13 merit of th e Di rec t or y, i n 1795. ti . 4 IIC HIBA LD ALISON, F• 1 1. S*E ., ,- ‘-tri, i ," l ttl fo _ ...,.._. . Advocate. 1, Ntrao\William Blackwood, Edinburgh ; and T. ft ondon. , In Syn., price Is. 6d. O th n EARNE, 81, STRAND. Ill:. P UNISH M ENT of DEATH, -titi„;t4 t ''howin g the tendency of the Punishment ' lo ti°0,lr1„:111-1.ce impunity, from the reluctance of Petty „ s k , 1 14 1 : 14 1 , , 1t l'lY THOMAS WRIGHTSON. t e rn hl et was referred to by Mr. Lennard, ;r:t the 411)11 4, April 16. 50, Albemarle street, April 18. PtlitlrYollON'S LIFE AND WORKS. ',"ii,„I,4,'EVENTEENTH and LAST '10()b1" Velum a the WORKS of LORD BYRON, 4 qt, E t." ' "4 Journals, and his Llfe, by THOMAS t op h - q u ., will not be published till the First of June a th r el u4lity witn which this popular publica rr•art.d - . on the First of every Month, since its : .l itl u Pff orts J anUAT, 1832, has been accomplished ' 4 4,144 0 , °ll the p art o f t h e Editor and Publisher, 7101c211,,,,,i,n1Y induced to depart from it in this in %loe kts% t hat th e concluding Volume, wh i ch will k kl, 1 , km ' to the namt.s omitted in the Le tern and 41tttiraateOPIOUS INDEX to the whole, may tie j r , k e 4 nd perlect as po-sible. -tm Murray, Albemarle-street. r ',µ.t. lk oti FIXED \\;11'li°„411:11E. Alt-T-IFIIAL ,TEELTIGHATURE_S, '",b lie WIRES OR OTHER LIGATURES, WITH Mt 1-Itki.-LING DECAYED TEE 11(.)41UCCEDANEUM. Sur () MOON-STREET, Ple Q , t , i , be . ' A ID ST RE__ , t , , 't UR NI SONS,AL_L”AANuaniti.N_ 4041,64.1/2 4t""' No. n RUSSELL' PAT,4Ih, ) and 32 GREAT ma / inently disting . Pt )-fts,4‘‘P_N-AuetY, g.rateful far the . high and iall A e " kiiii4,,poli",kle " Ill eh h" s°e.in m il i n the Brit and the ie . ott;-',uns since their a t r o r their Friends p to RE 80q4 ge ii :_y to announce. EXTENSIVE *hed their hliNt_ btQ4that they il, s w ,i i l t l h C th O ei N rC T E lN L lJ Eji R titictrAhl. m CEOeL.To 'lt ioti ; - ,,Y 14e FactiltvA't London and Paris. The, ith- DS, w etit th'' rtkpoilm ; ° FEW Cfe'N EFNIEUNI, so universally A re T c o o E pe rn D : and tli, e SLlgt. 'EDIN A SE Pressure, • 1 Ye the WrEST PAIN, HEAT, or and luting % I . rn ri44t tXCRU I TING PAIN, ,EETH, ‘'44..,,°l.Yeatt • m RUC IN, N/ilitll "11 4 k eY also FASTEN LONOFS,GELIEC r , or tS 14 !IbISING from AGE, NEGLECT, M NI I : titik 5;11t iikll/AUII,‘7.ETIINH'C(i.)tRom one to a c.ooO_ E., ‘)Utt.ointv, whit% ar E INCAPABLE ot IS hit t I'lttltnbr 'lr CORR(ISION, and fixed without s and 141,,,,74:.. ktleveeer,oft,W..,sir.te or any other LIGAI LIRE ~ and "rIQAOI,Iu.IIeOtiSE f .ARTIULATION 4 OPit't°'''rP•grelf:elttiln .a the Teeth. ) vl7 ~u~/IG~~/ !/ ( o. 1 '0;69 BRITISH INSTI I 17 1 lON, PALL-MALL, THE GALLERY for the EXHIBITION ;,tl.l SALE .f the WORKS of BRITISH AR TISTS i. Oorn D.ily from Ten in the 111orning till Five in the Eveninz. Adminninn 10.—G-italnvn• li. WILLIAM BARNARD, Kreprr. ABBOTSFORD SURSCRIP rioN. AGENERAL MEETING OF THE FRIENDS and ADMIRERS of Sir WALTER SCOTT will be hel I at the Thatch.-d Tavel n, Janes'--street, on SATURDAY, April 27, at 'Direr o'Clock, to receive the R-port of the Sub-Committee 0. Managemen', and to adopt •uch measures as m. )y hr jode.ed expedient to accomplish the object of the Sub scription. B. A. DUNDAS, Hon. See. 17th Auril, 1633. SECOND EDITION S UN-OFFICE, Seven o' Clock. PEItZIA ,-.LIAMENT THIS EVENING. HOUSE OL LORDS. On the LORD CHANCELLOR taking his s ' at, The third if-ailing of th.• Irish Jury Bill, and the Local Conrt's BM was rtstponett. The Duke of RICHMOND pre-ented thirteen petitions praying fir the :it) 'titian of 'very. The Earl of ROSEBERRY pre-ented petitions against church patronage term th and Fife. The Earl of MORLEY presented petitions fur the abo liti• n of slavery from several parishes in Devon. The Earl of WICKLOW presented petitions from three parishes in Ireland. The Earl of RADNOR presented a petition praying from the Wesleyan Methodists of Inverness, and of Saint Anthony's Chapel, Northumberland; and from several other places in Suffolk. A NOBLE Loan presented a petition from the congre gation of Baptists re-iding at Dies, in Norfolk, praying for the abolition of slavery. that the provisions of the Bill for preventing the profana tion of the Sabbath might be extended to Ireland. Also, a petition from Chittley, in Berk., praying that negroes allay enjoy the privilege of Christian worship ; and ,'Bother from Ashford, Kent, praying for the repeal of the odious tax upon mal Lord BARHAM presented petitions for the imme diate abolition of colonial slavery, from the parishes of Maslen, in Kent, and of Leake, in the county of Lincoln. The Dirt of RADNOR gave notice, that on Monday next he should move the ascend reading of the Staff„ird Bribery Bill. The Marquess of CLANRICARDE presented a petition against the Bill. The Bishop of NORWICH presented various petitions praying for th.- better observance of the Sabbath. Mr. TOOKE, and other Members of the House of Common-, brought up several private bills. A NOBLE LORD presented a petition from the Magis• trates at Bedfordshire, praying the House to amend the provisions of the beer Bill. Lord DACRE presented a petition from a parish in Essex praying that Methodists be relieved fiorn al church rates and dues. . _ The Bishop of LANDAFF presented a petition from the minister and congregation of Percy Chapel, St. Pan.. era., for the better observance of the sahhath. Lord SUFFIELD presented forty-eight petitions, all praying for the tot,' and irnmediate abolition of negro slavery, from the Presbyterian congregation and Synod of Brides; from the inhabitants of Paisley; several parishes in Sornersetshire; Shipton, and other other places, in Norfolk ; Warren, in Shropshire; Abing don ; the Protestant Dissenters of London and Middlesex; from the inhabitants of Warrick, Lisgean, Paiston, and several places in Cumberland ; from the Weleyan Me thodists of Northumberland ; from the inha•-itants of Arthur's Hi;l, Wynn, and other places in Northumberland; The Marine and Army Mutiny all went through Committee. The House then went into Committee on the Privy - Council Bill. After a few alterations were introduced into it, at the sugestion of Lird WYNFORD, the Howe adjourned till half-past three to-morrow. HOUSE OF COMMONS. The SPEAKER resumed his seat a few minutes after five o'clork. Mr. O'CONNELL cave notice that on Monday next, prior to the House going into a Committee of Supply, he would move for the appointment of a Select Committee to enquire whether the county of Kilkenny was in such a rtate of disturbance a■ justified the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland in proclaiming it, and applying the operation or die new Act to it. GRAND JUNCTION RAIL-ROAD. On the motion of Lord ALTHORP. the Bill to extend the railway from Warrington to Newton to Birmingham, was read a third time and pissed afer the introduction of three additional clauses by Mr. NV. PATTEN. Mr. HUIIE said the House would recollect that a Committee had been appoitred to inquire what offices were held by Members of both Houses of Parliament, and the amount of the salaries; it had, however, been found that the Committee had no means of ob , aining the in formation from the Members of the House of Peers, and, therefore he would move that so much of the orde' as re late t to the Members of the Upper House be di.ch•rg.d. He took this opportunity of stating that there were still 120 Members of the House of Commons who had not attended before the Committee. although they had been waiting ten days, and he hoped the present notice would be sufficient to induce those Hon. Members to furnish the requisite information. The part of the order relating to the House of Lords was then discharged. _ A the reque•t of Lord ALTHORT, Mr. BUCKINGHAM po.tponed hi, motion rdative to the erection of a new House of Commons to the 9tl) NEW BEER SHOPS. The Marquis of CHANDOS rose to call the attention of the House to the subject on which he had given notice of a motion—he meant the beer houses. His object in moving for a commi•tee on that subject was, not for the purpose of doing away with them altogether; on the contrary, he wished to place them on a letter footing, more properly to regulate them, and thereby to afford better accommodation to the public. There were at present not less than 26,000 beer, exclu sively of ale, houses in England, and lie believed a great deal of pauperism in the country arose from their multiplicity ; they were chiefly attended by paupers, who, in their turn, invited others, who spent all their resources in beer, and ultimately became greatburthens to the parish. (Hear, hear.) 'I he "„,licences were granted, too, with out any inquiry into the respectability of charac ter or circumstances of those who occupied beer shops. He wished to see the tenants of beer houses as the occupiers of ale-houses, and he hoped that while better order was secured in the management of the beer shops, a more wholesome beverage would be given to the public.—(Hear.) One great evil of the present system was, that Magistrates had not a sufficient control over the beer shops, and his proposal was to place them on a different footing, and subject them to better and stricter regulations. He wished the persons who obtained a beer license to be, in all cases, rate. payers of the p Irish. At present such was not the case. The Noble Marquis then moved the appointment of a Com mittee to inquire into the state and management of the houses, which, under the Ist of William IV, chap. 24, are commonly called beer shops, with a view to make such alterations in the law as should be deemed expedient, with a view to the better regulation of the same. Col. WOOD seconded the :notion. Col. WILLIAMS also approved of its object, but gave it as his opinion that the beer shops ()fight to be entirely done away with. He considered them the most fruitful sources of crime at present existing i❑ this country. The SPEAKER then put the question. Lord ALTHORP said, as far as he and Government were concerned. so far from objecting to the aprintm,nt of a committee, they were favourable to the inquiry. He was glad to find the Noble Lord did not go the length of the Honourable Member for Ashton, and that he did not mean to du away altogether with the xistence of the beer shops. He (Lord Altborp) was per fectly teady to admit that they required further regulation than they had at present; at all events, they should be -./_/12 t ; 114‘ +Kos tfeAt* # • ( ' - ^ f 0 • (kc , c, :t frs, • ♦" 7144 4 i I , , VM U~ • t' • un L lbr itt %- °* fort 1.1.• ~1311Mk143041471p It& VoloL tt 0 ( PRICE 7D.) were exposed to petsecution from one end of Europe , o the other—they were exposed to atrocities so atrocious, to miseries so miserable, that he would not dwell upon the description, hu , content himself by this passim; allusi. n to tho , .e cruelties, and to state one of its consequences. 1 heir present situation was in part the re.u't of those cruelties. This was a consequence periling almost as much to be re eretteil as the cruelties themselves. The feelines then .feneratel remained to this day, and were indulged to the prejudice of that people. They were no longer exposed ro martyrlom ; they were not tortured or put upon the rlek, but they were exposed to indienities and insults. —( Hear, hear.) It was by referring to the cruelties of the nations of Europe at a former period that we defended the insults which were still practised and were among their remaining effects.—( Hear, hear.) He had men tioned the conduct of the Jews in Europe, and he would quote a specimen from the farthest part of Asia. S .me of them had found refuge in China—there they were ad. .nitted to the honour of office—and an inscription had been found which recorded the virtues of the I, ws. It bete date 1515 ; it praised the Jews for their inteoity, for , heir fidelity, for their industry in agricnl-ural pursuits, trid said that they had served faithfully in the army, notwithstanding the peculiar nature of their religious cere monies It was to he remarked, in partienlar, that this inscription bore testimony to the industry of the Jews in ,gticultural pursuits, though hete it was said that they mere unfit for such pursuits, and only fit to engage in tr ide or in money lending. He had three n 7 four more proofs of the good conduct of the Jews. to which he would Overt. It had lie-n found th it the emaneip ition of the Jews in France had answered very well. Napoleon him -el. hail sta'ed that, and it was so well known that it w only neces‘ary to allude to it. A remarkable testimony, however, was borne to the Jews in the Chamber of Depu iies, on December 4. 1930, by the Minister of Publh: In struction.—(The Right Hon. Gentleman quoted this testi mony; its purport was, that since the convention hid placed the Jews upon the footing of other citizms, they had performed all the duties of good citizens.) They had fought in the French armies, and shed their blood for French honour like any other children of the soil. He would add one other tee imony, that of M. Ch Arles Dupin, who was well known in this country --(The Right Hon. Gentleman read a brief extract from the work of that gen tleman; as we understood, on " the commercial strength of France," to the same effect us the passage be quoted from the Alinister's speech.) Again, Prince Hardenhergh, the enlightened Prime Minis'er of Prussia, had emancip a- ted the Jews in that country in 1811 or 1812. In 1814, two years after the emancipation, Prince Harden b:•rgh had, in a❑ official lever to the Prussian Consul at Hamburg, borne the highe,t testimony to their merit-. As a remarkable ins . anca had recent'y been furnished of the bravery and devotion of the Jews to the clu4e of the country that gave them birth, he should just men tion the fact, which he had at second hand from Gem Chasse, that during the late extraordinary conflicts he• tween the Dutch army and that of France, the Jews were alike distinguished for bravery and for excellent conduct. If, then, they looked to the remote or to the recent his tory of the Jews, better soldiers, better patriots, better 'timbers of society at large, were not to be found ; and therefore was it the extreme of absurdity to refuse to them the rights of citizenship ; and the principle upon which that denial was founded would appear to be in the highest legree ludicrous, were it not at the same time in the highest degree cruel and unjust. It had been agreed by all Theologians, both Jewish and Christian, that the Jewish nation was labouring under some sort of ban, and thence the opponents of the change which he contemplated founded an argument for the position that it would be im proper to treat the Jews like oilier nations, but that proved too much, for it amounted to nothing less than saying, that whereas the Jews have been laid under the displeasure of Heaven, they have been subdued, expatriated, hunted to the ends of the earth, persecuted in every nation, and proscribed in every community where they ever made their appearance, and for that reason the people of Eng land are to persecute them still further, and inflict upon them, by the continuance of disabilities at utter variance with the acknowledged principles of the British Con stitution, a still deeper degradation. If the argument to which he was referring was good for anything, it would justify the continuance, not merely of civil disa bilities, but the renewal of the tortures of former times. There bad been, as was well known to all whom he had the honour of addressing, many prophecies as to the suf• ferings and persecutions to which the people of Israel would be subject-d. Now, he would ask the House, was it because men believed in those prophecies, that they were justified in taking into their own hands the exclusive right of fulfilling them? In point of fact, the argument to which he had been referring halted upon the one foot, and upon the other, and was incapable of being sustained by any effort of ingenuity. He did not wish to trouble the House with many extracts upon an occasion of that nature, nor did he desire to uphold, by me ins of authority, a cause which happened to be so strong in itself on every around of policy and justice ; but he could not refrain from calling their attention to the excellent observrtions of Bishop Newton, on the subject of those persecutions to which the Jews had for centuries been exposed. It was the opinion of that eminent theologian, that the nations by whom the Jews were persecuted incurred a very serious responsibility ; and though it was undoubtedly true that their dispersion and sufferings had been distinctly foretold, yet the nations who stood forward to render themselves the instruments of that persecution, took upon themselves to do that which indisputably exposed them to the wrath of Heaven, while, on the other hen i , those who abstained from taking any part in the fulfilment of these awful pro phecies, did that which was accep•able iii the eyes of God. He should net trouble them with hut one more reference to the writings of eminent men upon the great question which he hail undertaken to filing under the notice of a British Legislature—th it reference was to the writings of Rob-rt Hall, upon whom the Right Hon. Member pro nounced a warm euloeiutn. That celebrated man had said, that a long arrear of justice was due to the children of Israel for all the sufferings inflicted upon them by our ancestors. To that he had but to add, that it would be an ample reward to him fir all the efforts he had made in the cause, were they one hundredfold greater, should he prove the humble instrument of restoring to the per sons professing the Jewish faith those rights as citizens, of which they should never have been deprived—of making to them now, at the latest moment, some small acknow ledgment—lie could not call it compensation for the hor rible atrocities perpetrated against them in the course of centuries. He res ed his demand for this on the broad principle of religious toleration. He should at all times be prepared to contend that the infliction of religious dis abilities without reason was one of the most grievous species of oppression—that such disabilities without reason was nothing short of persecution. He trusted, then, that the time had arrived when England would wipe away the repromh of being intolerant—would ex• ite in the minds of the Jewish subjects of the King a love of that country which gave them birth. Influenced by eonsideratious such as these, he bad felt it his bounden duty to introduce a measure which should remove from the British ch ,ractei the stain of being unjust to those towards whom so deep a debt of justice had been incurred.—( Hear, hear) He concluded by moving a resolution to the effect, that it was the opinion of the Committee that it was expedient then to remove all civil disabilities affecting the Jews, in the same manner as a similar removal had been effected in the case of the Roman Citholic , . Sir ROBERT INGLIS regretted that his Right Hon. Friend, by whom the present motion bad been introduced, should have made such large concessions to the spurious liberality now so fashionable. He never had expected that the Right lion. Mover would have brought in a pro- position, the effect of which would be to open ever) avenue to political power to the Musselman from Madras. the Parsee from Bombay, or the Brahm in from Cilcutta. He could not overlook the fact, that it had been affirmed that in that House they incurred no has ird of ever havin g their religious feelings wounded, not even though a mixed body of religionists should come in amon g st them. Tha• in: part,gh t ,h athe first mustde view, ,"em plausible enough, but for thathi after the experience he hai , had of the last three years, it did appear to him that the ) were far from safe with respect to their religious attach ments, and that they were but little indebted to the for bearance of those, relative to whom so much forbearanci lied been petite ited. It was perfectly vain to say tha the admission of the Jews to power in Poland, in Po: tugal, or in China, had bad the effect of causing them to amalgamate with the rest of the community in thosi countries—th e y still existed there as a distinct nation and they would at once reject any benefits founded upon renunciation of their national character. The promotion Joseph and of Daniel in a foreign land, though referred t in support of the prinuiple for which the Right licia.Ziluve. LONDON, THURSDAY EVO , ;INING. APRIL 18, 1833. placed under the same restrictions as the public-hou.es, and at the same time the police of those houses required great alteration and improvemt-nt. He was allo of () pi_ n;on that stricter inquiries than at present should he in stituted ; licenses w. re granted as to the respectability of the appliiiants. Upon the whole, he expected sotne valuable suggestions from the Committee, especially as it was moved for on the principle that they should not be don • away with altogether. _ _ Mr. WARBURTON was happy that the Committee had been appointed. At all events the s,rue hours of re st,iction should reeultte the beer shops as regulated the public houses. It was alleged in that pet tion that the man hail been fined for letting his own son drink in the house an brur after the time limited by law; anti it was said the Magistrate who fined him declared that the relationship of the seller and drinker was nonsen.e, for if tt e seller hints 4 had been found drinking after the li:ni!ed hour, he (the Magistra'e) would have fined him.—(llear, and laughter.) It was a subject well deserving of a committee of inquiry. He believed it would be found that the be- r sold at these houses was Lass adulterated than that of public-houses. Mr. HUME cons.dereil the subject to be one which the public mind `vls much divided up n, and one des rving of the fullest roosi•terat;on. He himself thougl:t that r-howies should be extended, and not limited; and he sh 111(1 be able to prove to the C trttnittre, that the quality of the beer had improved ;11 con.eqtterxe of those beer horses.—(Cries of " No," and hear.) He would maintain in the Committee that it had improv,d in quality, and been reduced in pure. —(Cries of ‘• No, no," and hear.) However, the Committee would afford the means of t e fullest inquiry. Mr. BARING differed in opinion with the Hon. Mem ber tor Middle ex, whose ideas, although very well ap- OA to the metropolis were of no use as applied to the mo-al districts. Mr. PRYNIE spoke in favour of the present system. An Host. MEMBER suegested that the inquiry should he extender' to all public-houses. Tne question was then put, agreed to, and the Com mittee appointed. A mess .ge from the Lords announced that their Lord ships had agreed to thr Mutiny Bill without amendments. COMMUTATION OF TITHES. Lord ALT HORP said—ln rising to submit to the House a proposition for the commutation of tithes, I do not apprehend that it will be necessary for me dm.; to detain the House, especially in prefatory ob servations. The principal duty I conceive to be imposed upon me is, to detail the principl.a upon which the plan lam about to submit to the House is framed. It is of great import ince that such a measure as this should not only be substantially just betwe , n the partie-, but at the same time, that it should not in • ease the burdens al-early imposed upon the land. But before 1 go with this question at all, I think it very desirable th it 1 should disabuse the House and the public with respect to t e supposed:enormous amount of the income of the Church of Engl ind. It was assumed on a ree , nt otcasion that that income was nine millions per annum. Never was there a grosser exa4eration. The incomes of the Bishops, including the Bishop of Sador and Man, was only 155,526 ; and of the glebes and chape.s, 236,0001. I ton not able to st,.te so particularly the amount of the incomes of the parochial cl-rgy, because all the returns have not been made, but I calculate it to be very little more than the e millions. The whole to vther, therefore, amounts to very little more than three millions and a half, instead of nine millions —(Hear.) The manner in which I have calcu lated the amount of the income of the parochial clergy is th a : We have the returns from 9,640 benifices, the total number of which is 11,400. The amount of the income of these 9,640 is 2,759 6571. ; so that, supposing those from which the returns were not made were in the same porportion, which there is nit reason to believe they are, not, the total amount of income for 11,400 would b e 3,256,0001. If this were divided among the whole of the clergy, the average income of each would be 2851., and if the prebend tries, deanries, and chapelries were net counted in 3001. fyr each of the parochial clergy. The clergy are , tifferently situated in this country with regard to the re ligion of the people thin they are in Ireland, and all who have looked at this questi , n either in a political or moral point of view, and have seen the misfortune of having a resident clergyman in each parish, will acknowledge that this sum is not I irge for the attainment w such an object. I now come to the manner in which the revenue of the clergy is levied Whatever authority may •xist for the present practice, we are bound, in looking at it in a le g islative point of view, to con sider iv ether it be not productive o great disadvantages not merely to the payers of tithes, but to their receivers, the clergy, part,cularly in destroying that feeling of good fellowship which ought to exist bet•veeri the clergy and their parishioners. The payment of the clergy by means of ti hes has existed alms-t from time immemorial. This has been the view of the Legislature for a great num ber of years, bee fuse there has scarcely been a single en closure Bill passed in which the tithes are nut enumerated. It has been tlt to be so desirable for the interests both of the Church and the people, that such a course has been alopted in almost every inclostire bill, although in several perishes where inclosu , et have tak.n place, in early times, tithes still continue to be paid in kind, and although in many instances neither side have felt any great incon venience —(Heir, hear, hear)—yet, the tnlority of instances whenever disputes have taken place, the taking of tithes in kind has been productive of very greii inconveniencd. As I said 4,efore, nothing can be more advantageous to a parish than a resident clergyman—(Hear, hear)—but at the same time, it is ecessary to have a resident clergyman on good t-rins with his parishioners—( Hear)—and to provide for the clergy un ' , bet al terms would remove many difficulties. Having made these observations, in which I feel that I have the entire cuncurr•.nce of the House, and believing that the House will go along with me in saying it is desirable to introduce a commutation of tithes, I will now . . . proceed to state to the House the principles on which I proceed. I know there have been in many parts of the coon ry extravaeant notions as to what the :ilea might he, but I think what I have already stated, will snow that the object of the measure is not to take a step to produce any great sensation, but to propose that the c ergy should he properly rennin rated for .heir services. I think it is desirable that a m-asure of this kind should ~e in the first place purely purely permissive, and that the parties should fairly agree as to any arrangement they may think desirable slautd , l be made. I caulk coat a per. tnis-ive measure should have its fair trial first, although I arm free to confess that I do Got think th it a purely permissive measure will have all the effest that is desirable. I would, thetetoie, propose, first, that the measure shall give permission to the clergyman and the tithe owner, and the tithe payer, because, when I speak of the clergyman, I do not think it right to confine the commutation simply to the clergyman, because I think the same measure should be applicable to the MI e owner it be be a lay impropriator.—(Cheers.) I would first pro pose that p! mission be given to the tithe payer and tithe owner, whether he be a clergy man or a lay iinpropriator, to 'cake an arrangement for the perpetual commutation of tithes into a corn rent—l mean by a perpetual corn rent, a rent varying according to the price of corn.—(Hear, hear.) In making a proposition for a perpetual commuta tion, I think you should not confine the rent to the value of money, but that it should vary according to the value of Coen. The Clerym in, however, should Dot be allowed to commute tithes without the consent of the pa tron of his living, and the Bishop of his diocese, neither should the tenant be allowed to commtve the tithes of his farm, without the consent of his landlord.— (Hear.) My first principle will be to give a period of 12 months from the passing of the Bill, and permit the tithe payer and the tithe owner by mutual consent to commute tithes into a perpetual corn rent; but if after the expiration of 12 months this be not generally done, and I dare say in many instances it may not be done, although I believe iu a vast number it will ; if after that period the commutation be not ac complished, I then propose that either the tithe payer or tithe receiver, without mliking it necessary for a whole parish to agree, I vmuld allow any individual tithe payer to give notice to a tithe receiver that he intends to :_atninute the tithes.—(Hear, hear.) The tithe receiver would then be required to appoint the value in the manner I shall presently state to the House. It is of great importance that valuers should be men of *eat respectability, and there were other reasons than this why they should not be debated merely at the option of the parties themselves.—(Hear, hear.) It is my intention, then, to propose that those valuators should be nominated partly by the Bishop o f the dioceses, and that au equal number shall he nomi nate] by the quarter session.. It might thit fiequently happen that the parties kowing th• individuals who had been aupointed as valuators the same. individu Os would be chosen to value one subject. Thus each party, either the tithe payer or the title owner may give notice to the other party that they intend to app int a valuer ; and thus notice being given the valuation will proceed. Any persou, however, wh knows anything of the state of tithe property in this country, must know that, if an actual valuation were to take place for titheable property, in each parish, the effects would he to raise the tithes thronghout England most enormously, and wool most certainly prevent any commutation from taking pla , e. and, although it might seem to be justice, would really are , practically be most unjust. Aly plan, therefore, is, that in place of being an exact valuation the valuation should pro. coed on what has been paid for an average of previous years. The valuers, therefore, appointed will not have th e :duty of valueing the tithe, on the ground they wonld mita have to ascertain what had been the amount paying during an average of seven years previously. I think, however, it would be desirable to give then s , m e degree of latitude in making that valuation, and I propose that they should have the power o• altering the valnati in to a certain per centage, either above cr below the amount of tithe actually paid to the extent o between five and seven per cent. The Noble Lord went on to sty, if the valuers differed in their award, an umpire should he appointed, which umpire should he the senior judge of sessions. The valuers would have to fix the am iunt of tithes to be paid in corn, or in money ; and the tithe receiver should have the option o! taking it in kind or looney, fur a given number of yarn. If he preirred receiving his tithes in grain, the payer sh‘uld (led& in what grain to p•y it. It would of course he desirable that, when it W 7.19 feasible, a number of indi• viduals should agree as to the made—a whole parish, for instance; hut a holder of a lease might be permitted to arrange with the landlord to pay him the tithes in kind or in notney ; and the landlord be left to make his arrangement with the tithe proprietor The only object was to render a commutation of tithes upon equitable principles safe and easy. The advantage to both parties would be so great in the commutation tit tithes, that he felt confident each party, having the power of compelling the commutation of tithes would have the effect of pretty generally pro ducing a commutation throughout the country..—(Hear.) That would be a great advantage. He did not think it would be at this moment desirable to prapose any eq , ,itahle measure that would go ro an actual compulsory commuta- tion He felt greai difficulties is doing that ; and, after the best consideration he could give the subject, he that it would be hardy possible to propose any measure for an actual and forcible commute thin of tithes throughout the country. Having said thus much upon the measure het intended to move this evening, he hoped it would not be understood that in proposing the present measure, Government had no others in contemplation with respect to the Church of England. _.(Hear, hear, hear.) Other measures were absolutely necessary, some of them pressing more, some less. There was one measure which he hoped would be brought for ward either in this or another place, which was the prevention in future of pluralities.—(Cheers.) That was a measure which be considered pressed very much.—(Hear.) There were other measures perhaps equally as important, which were beset with difficulties, that he hoped would soon be overcome. Though the present measure might not appear of so very great magnitude, he thought that the House would ad mit to him, that if it succeeded in causing a general commutation of tithes, it would be productive of the beet effects. The proprietors of land and those generally interested in agricultural persuits generally would reap the very greatest advantage for the measure, as they would have the power of em ploying their cattle on their land for their own advantve. On the other hand, I do not think the Church ought to make any resistance whatever. I will rather think I do not think they will.—(Heir, hear. ) Sir, I do not think it necessary to trouble the House fur her ; and I move fur leave to bring in the Bill.—(Cheers.) (LEFT SPEAKING.) IMPERIAL PARLIAMEN . HOUSE OF COMMONS, Arum 17. Mr. ROBERT GRANT, in continuation, said— zens of the state in which they were casually placed ? notwithstanding their anticipated return to India? It was answered that " every Jew was regarded as a citizen of the state in which he lived, that he must obey the laws of the country, and conform hirn.e f in all transactions and affairs to the civil laws of the land ; but that if called on to serve in the army, he was exempted from having a religious custom which was incompatible with the military profession.—( Hear.) He asked what had been the practice of that people to which the objection was made He would only state facts in general terms, though the Committee might perceive that he could go into a very long statement. Even in the time of their captivity, when they were cast among the Persian and Babylonian nations, the same objection of unsocial nature was made to them, and their unsocial feelings and doctrines were urged upon th e sovereigns by whom they were protected. An address was handed to the anotisrch of Persia which concluded with these words—" It it please the King let it be:written that they (the Jews) be all destroyed "—(hear)—that monarch, who was the first Artaxerxes, agreed in the premises of the address, hut differed from the conclusion, and he destroyed—not those who objected to the Jews, but the objector—(H-ar, hear, and laughter)—and thus he put an end to toe argurnent.—( Hear, hear.) He sh auld however, be sorry that such would be the fate of the present objectors --(Hear and laughter.) He could adduce many instances to show that notwithstanding the affection they always manifested for the soil the country, and the institutions of their forefathers in Palestine they always acted the part of good ci tizens in those countries in which they sought protection. At last th. dispersion took place which reduced them to the state in which they bad been fur nearly 1800 years There was one fact that was curious, as it found aparallel about our 'awn time. The Emperor Julian, called some what aptly Julian the Ap state, was particularly anxious to conciliate the Jews, and he premixed them a restoration of their own country. He had the art, how ! ever, of endeavouring to bend them to his own political purposes.—( Hear, hear.) Has great and only r ival was the Persian Monarch, anal his great enterprise in which he wished to get the aid of the Jews was to attack the Persian monarchy. He used all his arts to conciliate the Jews of Mesopotamia. But they refused to listen to Julian's wishes—they kept in arms against him—they impeded his progress—they gave him the first check in his victo rious career, which led to his flush discomfiture, and overthrow of all his hopes. There was a similar example in modern times. He did not say that the policy of Na poleon was not mingl, t: with better feelings ; but in the a dvantages he gave the Jews he had undoubtedly a politi cal object; though he found that the Jews would not be tray their duties as citizens. In all the Statss where the Jews had been well treated they had always loved the Mocarch who protected them, and had always performed the duties of good citizens. Passing by all the ancient part of their history, subsequent to the dispersion, though he might borrow illustrations of the same truth from that, he would come to what was called the golden age of the Jewish dispersion and captivity—be meant that period before any persecution was adopted, and when they were employed by all the great Sovereigns of Europe. How did they behave ? It was uniformly found that they were faithful to their masters, and not less to the country in which they lived. It was hardly necessary that he should remind the Committee of Charlemagne, who, on a great occasion, when he sent an Ambassador to the Caliph, Haroun Alraschid, employed as his Ambassador a Jewish subject. The same was the case with the ce'e- Mated Pope Gregory the Great, who employed them in offices of trust and honour, and encouraged them to cultivate the land. But perhaps the most remark able scene of their glory was Spain, where they not only were admitted to high places, but were the chief a griculturists of the country, and under the Moorish sovereigns, obtained a great name and power in the laud. manyUnd oc ert e h u e pa C t h io r n i:t;an sovereigns, though excluded fro m eminent men of the the country. A ft er were that periodamongst the crusade against th e J ews , in which he was sorry to say France and England l e d th e way. That was the iron a ge of the Jews, as M r . Mil l man said ; the iron age , n ot from their crimes but from th e ir suff e rings. The iron of oppression then entered deeply into their souls, and they began the t~I~Z f.,Pe s(Wrryi} J/p / vI • -/& 1 - 017574 was contending, amounted to nothing Aix timately used for that purpose ; for, confessedly, rancements to political power were the result of a . - difeet miraculous interference for divine perposes, and could have no bearing upon any piece of merely human legislation. With respect to the cruelties coisesitted against the Jews in the time of Richard the FirstooNohn, sod of Henry the Third, to which hie Right'llif :lend had alluded they had certainly had the e ff ect of' neittg the Jews from the country ; but, if they once left the country, and after wards came back, they were bound to take the law as they found it. Were we, to accommodate foreigners, to to be called upon to alter our fundamental laws? Were we to be compelled to unchristianise the country for the sake of giving civil privileges to these strangers? When any person came to this country, it was his duty to con form to the laws of the country in which he is a stranger; and a stranger, the Hon. Baronet contended, the Jew would ever be, so long as be continued to look upon him self as only a sojourner in a land wh i ch was foreien to him—so long as be looked upon Jerusalem as his ultimate home. Christianity was the religion of the State in this country. Could any one point out a period in our history, since Christianity bad been the religion of the State, In which political power was intrusted to persons who were not Christians? He could not assign any motive for the insertion of the words in the oath which Members of Parliament were bound to take, by which words the Jews were prevented from sitting in that Honee; but whatever their motives might be, he would rest his case up .n the simple, and, in his opinion, undeniable fact—that political power never was intrusted to any man. or set of men, who would not pledge their fealty to the King upon the Sacred Book which we reverene • ; or at lead, if they were not bound to take their oaths upon the Gospols, they were re• quired to do so upon some symbol, which was sufneivtlt to show their adherence to the Christian faith, whether if wete upon the cross or anything else which Chriltians lookeci upon as sacred. He, therefore, felt himself ju.tified in serting, that the words "upon the true faith of a Christian," which are now said to be the only hi.r to the admission of Jews into Parliament, are perfectly in sc. ci-ordince with the whole spirit of the legielition of this relvive to the Jews. up to the period (the S h 1830) when his Right Hon. Friend hid first call ,d their avention to the subject now under discussion. The Jews were still pre exclu.led. by the very firm no the oath, from the exercise of civil power in this country; and no attempt bad ever 'won made to alter that policy with respect to them until the period to which he hid just alluded. That was the first occasion in this country when it had been proposed to confer political power (itt any but Christians. He recollected the history of th. Jew Bill, by which certain disabirities sfflcting the Heb"ews were for a short period removed, in 1743 ; but tb to..a sure did not go to anything like the extent of the present, and did not form any exception to the atat•inent which h e had just made. If such a measure as that of his Right lion. Friend were to be carri-d, Christianity soul I no longer be pat and parcel of the.law of the land. Ile had always mairvained, and he would always maintain, th it no person ought to be persecuted for hie re'igious opinions; but he contended that unless the Jews could be proved to be insecure in teir property and their worship, or their persons, there was no ground whatever for enter ing upon the subject. It was bla , phemy to deny that Christ was our Savi,ur, and a case might occur in which a Judge might hare to try a person fur such an offence. %Vas it proper that a Jew should he the Judge to try much a criminal? He might be told that Jews were al readv admitted to sit as Jurymen upon inch trials under the existing laws ; but the inconsistency was not so great in that cite. Arguments had been drawn from the practice of other countries, but the analogy of other countries w.s ao fit criterion for th;s. What was safe in the French Chamber of Deputies might not he safe in the English House of Commons ; and although it was certainly true that the Jews might be members of the French Chamber of De puties, or of the American Congress, yet he was not aware of a single instance in which a Jew bad taken his seat in either of those assemblies. He saw no point where they could stop, when they came to begin the system of alic fishing oaths as qualifications fur political situations, short of that which aerated to be approved of by the Hon. Member for Middlesex, viz.—the abolition of all oaths whatever.—(" Hear, hear," from Mr. Hume.) The question was—whether they were prepared to get rid of religious sanction, as a motive to influence human action.—(Cries of " No, no.") He had avoided to look at the question with a view to any considerations of reli gion; but on merely political grounds, he would resist the the proposition of the Right Hon. Gentleman to the utmos t of his abilities. Mr. MACAULAY said, his Right Hon. Friend the Member for the University of Oxford, bad argued the t the conferring of political power upon any paaicular class of individuals was a matter of grace, not of right ; that the distribution of that power being in t 1 0 hands of the supreme authority in every country, no one had a right to complain, whatever distribution the supreme authority might choose to make; that parties bad no right even to ask on what grounds some parties were endowed with privileges of such a nature to the exclu sion of others ; a doctrine so monstrous, if carried to its extreme extent, that no reasonable man could entertain it for a moment. Was the Right Hon. Baronet prepared to say, then, that it would be right for the supreme au thority to enact that no man should be admitted to poli tical rights unless he were six feet high, or unless he pos sessed some other capricious quolifiestion of a similar na ture ? Would not such a regulation, even according to the Hon. Baronet, be gross injustice ? Yet such would be the logical consequences of his argument, that the supreme authority has a right to dispose of political power to whom it chooses. Support the Government of India chose to siy that no man should have the direction of Government at Calcutta, at Bombay, at Madras, unless he were edu cated at the University of Oxford ; would the Hon. Bat onet consider that a just law? Suppose they were to enact that no man should be Governor-General unless he had been born at Southampton, would that be a right principle in the opinion of the Hon. Baronet ? Did the Hon. Baronet argue, that suclt te•ts as these might be enjoined with propriety by the supreme authority in. any country ? As well might they adopt at once the In dian principle of castes. But the Hon. Baronet asked whether it was the wish of the supporters of the proposed measure to do away with all religious sanctions in the con duct of human affairs ? To th it inquiry his answer was this :—There was one principle which lay at the bottom o f all reli4ion—a principle which formed the basis of all the rules of religion and morality, both in public and private life. He would ask the Hon. Baronet himself whether any principle were more strongly smetioned by religion than that by which every man was to study to the utmost of his abilities the happiness of his fellow creatures—that no min should inflict the slightest evil on his fellow, or instrumental in withdrawing from him the slightest degree of happiness? The real (petition then was, whe ther the withholding of political power from any particu lar class of individuals were not inflicting a useless pain upon those subjected to such disabilities—a pain which ought not to be inflicted unless those who were instru mental in continuing those disabilities could show what .dvantage was derived from them? As Christians, they were bound to regulate their conduct by that great rule which the founder of our religion declared comprehended all the law and the prophets—to love our neighbours as ourselves. We ought to do to others as we would edone by. Now to what did the next argument of the H in. Baronet amount? That if the Jews were once ad mitted to the possession of political power, there could be ito reasonable objection against admitting Mussulmen, Parsees, and Brahinins—..bat there could be no reasonable trgument against admitting any clam whodid not hold the gospels to be the word of God. Now the Hon. Baronet .aid he was not an advocate for persecution ; but it he was 4n advocate for inflicting any evil opus any individual in :consequence of that individual's political principles, he (Mr. Macaulay) did not see where he could stop, in the conclusions to be drawn from his principles, short of proposing again that nnhelievers should be roasted by a d .tti l n. O ou w ai o fi wf r fire. In disabilitiesose s ch it h s ort v , e t r l y le awd pri n cipleswas ad v ocated s u h p u n kl w e gt i uoi e otopw h h.oci t isht, h ; e :tret e ihr) ang o te,: n yr e.etHri wereifueon e sfr. they once admitted the propriety of persecution in one o . e ‘ a l i s e , e ib h m e e r . d f i o d l r f n ot t O b z e s e f c u e r , u d a , r n a e r Y a t w r h e : a r t: now! once with the t p e :tit entered iable to be led on by is series of steps from the lowest de gree to the highest ; and the same raw:, which juvified the first step would be no lets powerful if a second step ivere proposed. Political power was not confined to the drivilege of entering that House: and therefore the Hon. qember whoargued for removing the disabilities of the Jews, n so far us to enable them to possess property in land, was inconsistent in his logic, because property in land would evidently tend to give Jews a political influence. which vas no less formidable, if placed in improper bands, that which arose frem the possessioa of a seat in the House if Commons. Persecution was not advocated by any party in that House upon atast te r eh a wp e r t tinw p ,at r uhs i t o esn e n i edp li ed l a e nt s ht i tooa P fdi r p set t, h 4r C : a s : ay n i t... ion, it was admitted, had never produced s hy of tho se ff:cts which those who had recourse to it an t i cipa ted from .; it was agreed that it had ever produc . d the very typo. a e t ff re, ec n dh t e s eda t r i t. i . : f h o os sTt e ehr f e u t r hsel w iseg h he i c tme h v i , : i •ution was an evil; and there was no stopping in that career short of the inquisition. Where would the oppu • news of bit Right Honourable Frietili proposition Murray, Albemarle -street. 4441ithed, in 2 vols. price 203. in cloth, 1 1 1 ' L E T Y R 0 L. ~,;4,, g p it .. +I GLANCE at BAVARIA. ih:,'"q t ieii t t he Author of " Spain in 1830." !thiOst,takh,ble travellirg companion than with Inglis :, rn.• tii h t . s 4 otrebe,s!rader more completely along the him, observer s e a t. u , k , 47 t ,j4 t, !y a ;,:: a we rl do not know . ur H e e of i s s eei h n e g what he de. i I,,'' ' Measunre n o e t xt he o arin e g p h e i a s s detscriptions."—Literary 'ti; l t II v ery • liii44‘lo,4l:lteresting volumes."—Morni i ng C a hronicle. oro to W I t t hdii tt ° i U i r . ,Foli t f h o e r n to re i u - ie m t . o meet with work M '' t4ktr , Treader, and Co., Ave Maria-lane. The kern _ In 3 vols. price 273., GIL BLAS, or PEDRO of PENAFLOR. .......... By the same Author. ,( *) ) ; 1 5t imia.shed, price 103. (with Plates), A ' I ANRY.—An ABRIDGMENT of 04,4 p, 1 I , ll t "iIkti` Tr ,GULATIONS for the MOVEMENTS and kii l , l4, 4`v\. of the CAVALRY, as last corrected by I. CP ‘ ‘, l ‘tij ° facers, and established by the Adjutant lkil lt ," 14 11sIler of Feb. I, 1833, ad ipteil to the Use of 1 , 441 k 4 th e y CORPS—with Sugc.estions on several 't14:41144 Discipline; a Notice of Patrol, Picquets, ; 4 4:,.°Iti t - t Of Precaution in times of disturbance; "ilii i / th -1 "" and an Abstract of the Regulations h of 11 " ,11 % Office, and Secretary at War, for the Yt itta t erit nanry. p h", a nt-Colo ne l th e H on . W. D. ROOS, IN t - tih li,C td r 'gade-Majo r of the Cavalry. 141,1t.tt. 0n,.. b 7 W. Clo wes , 14, Charing-cross.