The Sun. — London, England, 1830-11-16 00:00:00

~~ Ld d ,---7- / ~/,. -r...., ......0, . .. . . . . . . • . . , Ai ''' '', l4 7:. '••••.), • , / I - # fAt-1) ,- • Toisv, , ,, . p il4so r T ' '' . ' ' 1 . --", ' - r I :. 'II& .• . '," 4 "NAp o gi d ,,t, . ..77:476r4'' ' ~,„: ' 7 ..\ : 1 • Tik . - I'4' ..:4„ iit " VI : 7 0) , -, ' , .0 , \--. . . .. \,..„_. over waft, i' 444: 4, T1:11. , 1 ,10 1 6 , 02Egi 4.-- . F~ ~ ~ ' ~ o . • • 7/„/ KEY, MAYOR. A COMMON COUNCIL, holden at the MANSION- 11 OUSE of the CITY of LONDON, on,llliind,,tiy; the 15th day o f Nov e mber, 1830. ..• .Resalved—That this Court, as the Representative ;Body the citizetti of London, having at various times ex , kiwi! its opinion of the propriety and necessity of it re , vision of the present state of the Representation cif the 'Comment' in Parliament, is called upon in an especial marlnee 4t the present moment (after the declaration of the Minister .of the Crown, that the Representation is oatisfastory, to the country), to make a renewed avowal of hilt 6 nv,ietion, that the House of Commons, as at present constituted, is as tar from being satisfactory to the conntry, • as it is from being a real Representation of the Ileop!e. :,Resolved--That the pow e r n o w e xercised by various Peen and Other interested Persons of returning a large • , portion of the sGmbers, is wholly incompatible with the ,true 'lnd and design of a House of Commons ; which in PO 4 I 4 and in practice ou g ht to be -- a Representation, not of private,' but of general interests ; an effectual con 'taxation and the piddle expenditure; and- the which the Commons of the Realm may fully exercise that share in the Legislators to which, by the they are entitled. , 44 01 Yed- 1 -That Petitions, founded upon these Resolu. - • tug*, be forthwith presented to both- Reuses of parlia. "lent; praying theM to institute a full and faithful inquiry into the state of the Representation, - with a view to the remedying of such defects therein, as time and various r • e ner"thmeoto haVe produced, so as to give real effect to the easential principles of the Constitution ; namely, that • 4 liObiri of Parltatuent shall be freely chosen ; that not interfere in Elections, and that in the of Commons the King may with truth be said to ref his' Polite in Parliament. ` et WOODTHORPE. - A SYLUM FOREIGN and DOMESTIC 4 1. 1 L PPE OFFICE, Presenting the lowest rates ever ; for young and healthy lives,—with the option of Paiiiig'on an Ascending Scale, or leaving one•tbird'ot pretoitmt to he dedttcted from the snail assured.' 1401 trItaW , of persons of delicate - Wealth, of i"elowea'age, or of females in a state of pregnancy. ~fllcent, whether in active service, or not. And for Voyage. or Foreign Residences in any parts of the world. • 70, Cornhill, London. DIRECTORS. • ' The fiatiourahle William Fruer, Chairman. • Colonel.EMMington, Deputy Chainnan. vig a r m a gr t etfm. C . W. Hallett, F.sq. John' Kym er . ' . Sir Janice ()ambler. Francis Ketahle William Edmund Ferrers, Esq. • Can (4.4, is • Thomas Fenn, Esq. ••arrAs, b .P. G.Farren,Esq Resident Director PallitelAN—Dr. Ferguson. Stitaitorni-11. Mayo,and T. Callaway, Frq. • • ltieUrancea may b e effected without delay, and lull par ticulars obtained from the Resident Director. This day was published, price Id., No. XIX. of THE MERCANTILE JOURNAL; Containing, in the Mercantile Department —Accurate Price Currents of Atirchandii e in London, Liverpool, &c. ; Full Particulars lA Lerehaudize Imported into Liverpool, Hull, and Bristol; r ,'"*" .. ,...num and Li ver p oo l E xpor t s ; D t li v e r i es for Home utuption during the Week ; Mercantile Saks adver tised tor the Week in London and Liverpool; Shipping 'Entered Inwards, Shipping Entered for Loading, and Shipping Cleared Outwards ; with much important Com inertial Information. Financial Department—The Government and Foreign Fundy, Public Share Companies, &v. &c. General Department —The Gazettes , of England, gaol , 11 91, and Ireland, including Insolvent Debtors, Chief Oc ‘ eurrenees of the Week, &c. Orders and Advertisements ate received by the Pub- fisher, at the Ofßee, No. 24, Cornhill ; and by Messrs. liftma n and Co., 19, Old Boswell-court, Strand, Lon. 161 ; alio by respectable • Booksellers and News Agents • , Putridly. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. :1 HOUSE OP LORDS, kfowniv, Nov. 15. . , The LAO CUAKCICLLOK, took hie seat on the Wool sack shortly before Fire o'clock, NEGRO SLAVERY. Petitions wer e presented against Negro Slavery, by the Earl of lloseberry, the Duke of Norfolk, Lord Ravens. Wind), the Marquis of Sligo, Lord Whariicliffe, the Mar quis of Cleveland, Lord Eldon, the Earl of Carlisle, and Turd Durham. NEW POLICE. Lord DURHAM, pursuant to a notice which he had given on a previous day, rose to present a petition front the churchwurdene, parishioners, and inhabitant house holders of St. Mary, Newington, praying their Lord ships to institute souse inquiry with respect to the New The petitioners stated that by the 10th George IV. they were subject to the operation of the New Police Acts that'since that period their property had not burn ~,6 0 protected , , but their expenses had increased.— ;hp considered the system cranky one, and prayed that Ttuer the Act might be altered, or the police be with "'lwo in tyro from their parish. lie (Lord Duilum) on making enquiries hail found that the parochial watch-rate under tie old system did not exceed 3,000 L, but that now it exceeded 4,800/., and though it appeared that the, parish were rated only at eightpence in the pound, yet in consequence of the rate including uninhabited hewers, it iluicsuntril to full a shilling. Thepetitionere oleo complained of there being too nutty men on duty by day and too few b -Y night; and that upon any extraordinary occasion— such, fur instance, as that which occurred on Tuesday last, l e:, 11 " the greater part „f the Police were withdrawn um that neighbourhood for the purpose of protecting klinisters in title, on that occasion the petitioners were 4 , 1 t wholly w i t h out protection. T h e pet i tioners th o u g ht t . n eel. ought to b e some connec ting link between the inhabitants of the parish and the Police, and PN P°lcol that there should .be Police chosen who oksuld retitle within the perish. With regard to the Priety of this alteration, he (Lord Durham) intended to g iV e co opinion, nor did he wean to say one word op the 4146 cieney or non-suffiviencrof the Pollee: he felt grati .4,l at not having been in a situation whicheelled en him I T , judge upon th at su bj ect. He roust , h owever , sa y, th a t eartdurltd 4 l'6ll Ce in that part of the town, where hi• resided, had themselves with the greater; propriety. Noble would recoll ec t th at w h en t h e Police Bar was first I lth _iroucell into the House, lie (Lord Durham) complained iattutitu a its introduction, obset•ving that it, would for Noble Lords to give it het o ‘ attention which it deserved. The parish IA •• o orge, llanover-square, WAS likewise Subject to se ine obse rvat i ons wh i ch he h a d ma de w i t h re f er ence to the WWI of St. Newington. The rates there Li , ;er iitereas e d f rom t i vo to I ,,, ee nt ee e thousand pounds. t 4, .';us objecti ons h a d b ee n raised by persons Earl e , 1 •, ► " 1 ". and he wished to know from the Nohle Who (Roselyn) whether the announcement to "u intended presently to refer was 9 1 4 not. 11.4. przei,iiit:t..utiti,ool f i iku;ruisiay stlatit, the following announcement last an order was read to the 1, 41 , 1 7 Police, ordering all those who had voter fur Nor -4411Ju give in their namee to their ouperintendent." He !° .) oleo wished to observe, thet the present*Membet r N rwi „ t i ht oars ova notice of ;notion to extend the nf voting to those persons who resided in the w hether as Well its in the county. He did 'not know r what he had alluded to above was the fact or nut b ut t h e ' dut lie Wished t ascertain it. It we* 114 t )14 le ° • to !,ring fikWard totentisu at the prevent moment , h er any motion on the subject of the New Police, li tta w att it his wi s h t o j o i n i n the foolish cry that bad , r i eilled against them. lie trusted, however, that Orb cur s appoint Committee to inquire into (fir. L o ri' 4 114410dt° by the petitioners. ti 'SUFFIELD thought that the establishment of t p le , 1 1 . ) Z 4 - 1 ataxia to be looked to as a whole, t • Ow Noble Lord (Durham), had no wish 41 4 Itie tei voice SCIISCICIIS outcry that had been bet against them. The tirl of EOSSLYN denied most positively the le c , h rg of any such order as that tO which tlit 041 I I: Lord had referred. Every man in the employ ot to 2 1 ;" wits pi:milled to vote at the elation referred 7 " '"Ulit any question whetever being put to them, witont they intended to vote fur. The Nest Itau i only been introduced into Newington in te_tr.ceee last, therefo re t h ey h a d not as yet h a d a fair With reference to St. George, Hanover-squarei it . 4 00 1 perfectly true that the raw lied beim tatia,tl th st /*, t° 1 71000/. ; but it was equally as true that hitd ineravaqi twofold. Ile believetli generally , ' 414 that since th e esta bli s h ment o f d ie N ew P o lk * ~2!kenees of parishes bail been lessened instead of in. 6 47 1 7' The dislike that now sawed aga;ust than 11, 0 it ! te lted by the jealo usy o f par i s h author i t i es , fearitie vi ol Could lose power by their introduction. to l'e doubt diet the eatebtist an eet of the New Polies * B"Z d r Met beneficial. II! O FIIELD observed, th e establishment Of do 1 1 " 4L ' 141 0. 1101 141)ti :its environs emit no less that. Pee annum watch-Wei. 'Since the establish %f,- the New P o li ce the expenditure had been '" ° °l., but title silence included the protection of LONDON, TUESDAY EVENING, NOVEM BER Jo, 1830. No. 11,912. ineny districts in, the , neighbourhood of the meqoplis. wholly unprotected before. Lord TENTERDEN bore testimony to the goi4 con duct of the Police, and observed there were inanyi mor. apprehensions now than formerly. I ' Lord DVAHAAI wished to know whether Minister. .wete prepared, to institute an enquiry into the New Yule e. • Lord ROSSLyN.said that Ministers were not prepared. THE 'REGENCY. The LORA CrIA.NCEI I ,LOR then left the Woollack, and addressed their Lordships to the following effect : My Lords, I rise inconsequence of the notice which 11 give lest week, in order to submit to your Lordships' judgment the measure .which his Majesty's Government have pre pared, in consequence of his Majesty's recommendation iti his most gracious Speech from the Throne, for the purpose of providing for the administration of the Government of the country, in the event of the demise of his Mitiesty, be fore the successor to the Crown shall have arrived at years of maturity. My Lords, Ido not intend on this occasion to enter into ; any . detailed consideration of the inert sure. At present I will confine myself to state the prineiples on which his Majesty's Government have proceeded in framing the which I hold in may hand, and to'describe: the out line, of ite provisions. In the first place, my Lords, must observe, that in framing this' Bill his. Majesty's Qovem• 'Pent heve,tint thought it 'necessary to provide "10 t'vrry possible contingency that may occur. The principle by ' which they have been goVerned is this; Hiving,' in the Artie place, Considered what were the various exigencies that might arise, the various periods at whiclt those exigencies might arise, and the means which would exist of legislating for any of those exigencies at any of those periods, his Majesty's Government, for those cases in which it appeared to them that it would he difficult or inconvenient to legislate on ,their occurrence, have proposed to legis late on the present occasion. On the contrary, my Lords, wl.enever it , appeared to them, that on the oceur rein° of any of the events under consideration, an oppor tunity would be afforded for legislating with no more diffi culty or inconvenience than at the present moment, they have determined not to anticipate the decision of a future Legislature, but to leave the question free and untouched. Again, my Lords, in framing the Bill which I am shout to have the honour of requesting your Lordships will allow me to lay on the table, his Majesty's Ministers have thought it the wise and prudent course to legislate as little as the necessity of the case would admit, and to leave the existing law and the Constitution to operate wherever they are applicable. I think your Lordships will feet that, in pursuing this course, and acting on these princi ples, his Majesty's Government have discharged their duty in a manner the most' consistent with prudence and wis dom. It must be obvious to your Lordehipi that the main point is to protect the person, and to secure the succession to the throne of her Royal Highness the Princess Victoria. That illustrious personage is now in the twelfth year of her age. The period of her majority, as qualifying het for the Sovereignty of this country, will not arrive until her Royal Highness is eighteen years old. The principal object of this Bill, therefore, is to provide, ha the event of the demise of his Majesty before the Princess Victoriashall haVe arrived at the age of 18, for the Administration of the Government of the country during the interval. That, my Lords, was the duty imposed upon his Majesty's 'fili• nistere in preparing this Bill ; but I am quite sure that lam Milt speaking in unison with the feelings of every Noble Lord who hears me, and in unison with the feelings of the great body of the people of this country, when I offer an earnest prayer that the valuable life of his Majesty may be lung preserved to his faithful and affec tionate subjecte.—( Rear, hear.)—l am quite sure that your Lordships and the great body of the people of this country feel that no greater calamity could befell us than the death of our present most gracious Sovereign.—(Hear, hear.)—But, my Lords, notwithstanding all the wishes and all the hopes that we may entertain on that point, it is neceseary that we look to what, however much it is to be deprecated, is .neverthelesa a possible occurrence ; and it is in that view of the subject that his Msjesty'e Mini sters have prepared the measure in question. The provi *ions of that measure are of the most simple character. The first qu'estion which your Lordships will naturally ask is—whom we propose as the guardian alter Royal High • now under the circumstances inferred? lam sure, how ever, that the answer will at once suggest itself to every mind. It would be quite impossible that we should re commend any other individual for that high office than the illustrious Princess, the mother of her Royal High ness the Princese Victoria.—(Hear, hear, hear.)—The manner in which her Royal highness the Duchess of Kent has hitherto discharged her duty in the educe thin of her illustrious offspring—and I speak upon the subject not from vague report, but from accurate information—gives us the' best anticipation of her Royal Higlinesee future Conduet..-4Hear, hear.)—Looking at the past, it is evident that we Cannot find a better guardian for the time to c0me...411m, hear.)—With respect to the Regency, and the means to provide for discharging the functions of the Sovereignty, it is important to sepa rate that consideration from the other. It is, however, the recommendation of his Majesty's Ministers that on the 'event of the demise of the Crown, what appears to us to he the only constitutional course should be adopted, and that her Royal Highness the Duchess of Kent should be appointed sole Regent.—(Hear, hear, hear.)—There is another question on which it is necessary for me to say a few words. It will be asked me;—" it may happen that a child may be born to his present Majesty ; do you intend to provide in your Bill or that event ?" My answer is distinctly in the negative. His Majesty's Ministers have thought it unnecessary to provide for such a contingency, for this reason—whenever such an event may occur, or Whenever there may be at reasonable probability of its speedy occurrence, as it will be competent to the Legisla ture to provide for it, and it will he inore'easy to provide for it at the lime than by anticipation, the case comes under the principle upon which we determined to frame the ineasure—namely, to abstain from legislating with refe• rence to those contingencies, on which,whenever they occur, Parliament may legislate without any difficulty or incon venieuce. For that reason, my Lords, we do not propose to provide for such an event. The next point to which I on desirous of calling your Lordships' attention, is one of no incensideruble importance. I 'have already said that his Majesty's Ministers pCopose diet her Royal Highness . the Duchess of Kent shah be the' sole Regent. The question is, whether her Royal Highness should have a Council to moist her? If we were to be gulls' by prece dents, those precedents are in favour of the appointment of such a Council. I do not Speak of the precedents of old times; the alteration of habits, the change in the eircum stances ism/ situation of the country, tinder strch pmee !lents very remotely applicable to the present case. It would 4 difficult also to find in any of those ancient pre cedents au instance similar to the present. Passing by, therefore, all those precedents, I proceed at woe to advert to two of more modern date-- the one occurring in the latter part of the reign of George 11., in the year 1751 ; he other occurring in the fifty-first year of George 111. In both thoae cases a Council was appointed to assist the Urgent. My Lords, no opportunity has been afforded us if judging by practical experience how far those prece dents were such as it lyould tse desirable to follow. On that point, therefore, ne argument can be eaised. But, my Lords, ►t has appeared to his Majesty's Government, and I have no doubt that it will appear to your Lordship, that as the prerogatives with which th'e CroWn is in ' vested are intended for the preservation of that balance between the different estates of tbe rerbti 11019,en ' sable to the maintpnance of the , Constitution-L-and ar therefore the Crown itself ought not to he deprived of pre• rogatives So essential, the expediency of not diminishing the royal prerogatives applies still more strongly to a Re gent; .because the limited duration of the power of a Re gent renders that power less influential. lf, my Lords, you take from' a Regent those prerogatives which you would besilite to take from a Sovereign, because you know that by so doing yo 4 would endanger the Constitution, you wou ld more certeinly produce the evil that yon would wish to a void. On these principles, and on these grounds, we object to the appointment of a Council, professedly to assist, but in reality to contralti the Regent. I do not mean to say that a position of affairs might not arise-- that a Regent might nut he chosen, which position and which choke might not render it highly proper to appoint a Council. A case might occur in which at would be neecsattry to select as Regent an individual of great afabi outs, of great popularity, of great influence, of great autho city, whose sole sway might lie dangerous to the State. file power of such an indtvidusl it might be wise and prudent to circumscribe by surrounding bins with a Council. But such, my Lords, is not the case now. The 11.-gent whom we propose to appoint can never succeed to the Thyme ; her interests are identified with those of the future Sovereign ; she is united to her by the tenderest ties ; it will be the interest of the Regent to 'it'd to the authority of the future Sovereign ; none of those motives for self.aggrandieement can occur in this real ease which might occur in the imaginary casethat I have ;uet described. In the precedent of 1751 manydebates took place in the other House of Parliament. The argu ,nents of Mr. Sp, aker Onslow, and of other Hon. Mem bers who were opposed to the appointment of a Omitted) of Regency, appear to me 'to have great weight. The Attorney-General of that day, Mr. Dudley Ryder, gave it as his decided opinion, that a sole Regent, unfettered any Council of Regency. was much more consonant to he principles of the Constitution than a Regent surrounded Ind checked by such a Council. The only argument'. urged at that time by the supporters of. the Council was, that Pediment was establishing a precedent; ustd that cases might occur in which the appointment of a Council of Regency would he highly expedient, but might be re- 'listed on the score of precedent. But surely, my Lords, that was weak and shallow reasoning. Why not allow every case to be judged of by its own merits? Why not leave the Legislature to deal with every future emergency precisely according to its particular character and circum stances? To me it appears to be a monstrous proles— sition,.. that . if at any period the interests of the country. require the appointment of a Council of Regency, the Legislature shall be precluded front making such an aPpointinent, because a preceding Legislature, un der circumstance* of a different nature, had abstained from it! At the period to which I have b.en ad verting, the Council was to be compt B.d of fourteen indi viduals, seven of whom were to be Ministers of State. There was this provision, that no Nlernher of the Council should be removed from it without the concurrence of half the Members of the Council. Looking, therefore, even at the manner in which the Council was funned, it is nut a precedent which 1 could recommend for imitation. Fur these reasons, I submit to your Lordship that it is far better, in the present instance, that her Royal High ness the Duchess of Kent should not be fettered by any Council; but that she should be left to administer the Government by means of the responsible Ministers of the Crown. That is the course which his Majesty's Ministers conceive to be most consistent with a just and efficient administration of the Government. There is still ano ther question, my Lords, to which, however reluctantly, lem compelled to advert. I *ay reluctantly, because it refers to a possible case for which we have no authority, no precedent. The subject was alluded to in the last Session by a Noble Earl who is not now in his place.— It is a subject is certainly beset with very grave difficulties) ; arUi I conies., my Lords, that I approach it with some degree of apprehension. It was stated by the Noble Earl, to whom I have alluded, that, although the Monarch might have no child living at the time of his death, a posthumous child might neverthe less be. horn. In that case, my Lords, ' clearly, and without the possibility of controversy, that rbild, whenever its birds took place, would instantly sue. teed to the Throne. Of that, there is no doubt what ever. But the great difficulty is to decide what are the existing rights in the interval between the demise of the Crown and the birth of such a child. It is very extra ordinary, my Lords, that as far as I have been able to as -certain, aa.isted on the subject as I have been by some able friends, no case of the hind has occurred in this coun try since the Norman Conquest. It is very extreordinary that with respect to this point, no notice has been taken by any old writer on our Ilw and oonstitution. In the debetee on the Exclusion Bill in the reign of Charles IL, it was incidentally noticed in the other Houseef Parlia ment.; A Learned Gentleman, Mr. Hargreave, in a work entitled , f Brief Deductions," has stated in distinct terms, that the law on the subject is unsettled; and I confess, my Lords, that I have been unable to find anything op inured to that statement. If we divert our attention front our own country, and look to what has occurred with re ference to the Monarchy of France, we shall. find only two instance*, in which a Royal posthumous eland has been born The. one was subsequently to the death of Henry V. . On that occasion, on the demise of the Sovereign, the Presumptive Heir .to the Crown wee declared Regent. The child proved to be a son, and of course borne diately succeeded to the Throne. Charles the Fair left his widow seven m o uths gone w i t h c hild, i u that ease also, the Presumptiv e H e i r t o t h e C rown was declared Re gent. But in that eas e , th e child proved to be a d aug h ter, arid was of emirs* excluded from the Throne by the 'align° law. But, my Lo r d s , th e p r i nc i p l es of a foreign Government are not those to whi c h we ought to lock f or a model. Nor are the circumstanc es o f t h e two countries the same. We are, therefore, driven to the necessity of con-idering the subject with reference to what appears to lie the general principle of our own law. The descent of the Crown follows the rules of the descent of real pro perty, In most respects, except where there are two daugh ters, in which the real property is shared between th em . It becomes, therefore, important to inquire what happens with reference is/ a posthumous child entitled to real pro. perty. My Lords, it has been settled in the Courts of Justice of this country, that such a child, before it is born, cannot be seised of such property. The right to enj o y and possess it is in the presumptive, heir. H e has the whole interest in it; from the death of his predecessor until the birth of the child. That precisely the lame doe. trine stands good with respect to the Crown, I win not assert with confidence; but this principle is undoubtedly common to both ; namely, that there can be no abeyance, that there can be no vacancy. The King , never dies. There must always be a Sovereign. The principle. ap plied to real property is applicable to the Crow n . The , child unborn cannot be seised of the Crown ; it must devolve for the time to the presumptive heir. My Lords, I know that this is only reasoning from analogy. I submit it to your Lordship.' consider. ation. I beg to say, to your Lonlships' indulgent consideration ; seeing the nature of the question, and the diffiaulties which surround it.—( Hear, bear.) My Lords, we have two course to pursue ; we must either adopt the course taken in the French Monarchy, or we must appoint a Regent to administer the functions of the Government iu the interval between the death of the Monarch end th e Arai of the posthumous Add. Your Lordships will, however, advert to this eircutabtatice—Ahat the Govern ment, under any Regeneyi mug be administered in the name and on behalf of the Sovereign. If you appoint a Regent to administer the Government, without stating that he is to administer it in the name and on the behalf 07 the Sovereign, you create a'Parliamentsry. Sovereign under the title of Regent. It would he more tterrect, therefme, under such circumstances, to say that the Regent shall ad minister the Government in the name and on !Audi of the Presumptive Heir; and that he stall be liable to be di vested of hie authority on the birth of the posthumous ehi'd. When I say that the King never dies, I appall to the uniform proceedings of. our Courts of Justice, TV re is no proceeding in any civil ease, there is no pmcceding in any criminal cave, which does not take plat* in the name of the King. Such or such an act is said to he quivio the King's peace. The King is riiwgya vuppowd to exist. I repeat, thereforg, toy LOrds, that the best course will b, to appoint a Regent, to act for the Presumptive Heir to the Crown, liable to be divested of his authority on the birth of a p istliumous child. The sei.in in 14w must rest somewhere, and in whom ought it to rest if not in the heir Presumptive ? This is the principle of ths ry of reel property ; and the e.me 40' the same prin ciple apply, in the I,4lleut extent, if we argue from analogy in regulating the &went of the Crown. There it, too, another point connected with this part oldie emotion, which I think merits your Lordship.' consideration. If you say that the succession to the Throne oan lk4 either vacant or in suspension until there .;* tt of a child being horn to deetroy eiaint of the'heir Pro .umptive, it may happen Slat, even with the probability of such art event taring Place, 'a child tuay eventually not be Itorn. 'Now ' my 'Lords, it Max', therefore, oCcw ti tit the prettungrive heir was the Illooerch entitled to the throne upon tl i e very instant of the demise of the last postetwor of the Crown, and that you have, by the appointment of a Regency under such circumstances, and under the expec tation of the birth of snot'icr heir to the throne, deprived him of his right, and excluded him from taking that which wipi his right the moment of the ilemiee of the forinii . sk:: vereigo, - 7: ( h ear, hear. consitleriim all' the be s in of u queacteit o ditfiCtift acid complicated, j have It It my duty to consult all tl.use learned men who are the official edvisers of the Crtetvn, anti they tine and all con cur in,that view of the question which I have now endea voured to explain to your Lordships, and agree in opiition that there are no eases on record by which we turn regulate our decision, but that WC must guide ourselves by Vtii*Ort ing from analogy, and by 4 reference to those laws regu lating the descent of VW property to which 1 have airway called your Lordships' attention. Before your Lordship, come t o any decision on a question of such grave import ance, I would suggeat the propriety of allowing some littL time to pass by, in order that your Lordships may hay , an opportunity to put Yourselves in poasession of al? the Authorities which are connected with that part 0' the subject. On the principle, however, that it is ne ceseary to provide for the possibility of the birth of t posthumous chill, we Kopec, on the same terms and to the Same extent that we have thought it right to mark, her Royal Highness the Duchess of Kent the guardian I , o r heiress presturiptive, and the Regent of the kingilon iluring her mintnity—we now propose, I say, to provide bye Bill, that in the event of the birth of a child afte the demise of the Sovereign, her Majesty the Queen ahoule ~ ecorne the guardian of that child, and the Regent of th, kingdom during the continuance of the minority of tha child—(Hear, hear, hear)—the same arguments and th, , mine principles applying equally to the one case as to tht other---(hear, hear)—the deep interest which the parent mustrdways have in the safety mid prosperity of her off spring pointing out that parent as the fittest and moat pro per person to be the guardian of the infant and the Regent tharing i its minority. This, my Lords, is the outline at the Bill which I submit to yoursonsideration. I abstain hoot entering into details, because I feel that those, details will be much better understood by an examination of the Bill itself. We propose then, my Lords, that her Royal Highness the Duchess of Kent shall, in the event of the demise of the present Sovereign, he the Guardian of the Heiress Presumptive, and the Regent of the kingdom, until the Princess arrives at her majority—that is , the age of eighteen years; and we also propose that in the event of the birth of a posthumous child, her Majesty the Queen should be in the same manner the guardian of the child and the Regent, acting in the name and on the behalf or the infant during its minority. These, tny Lords, are the heads of the Bill. The details, as I said before, it is un necessary to enter into at this moment, and I shall there fine conclude by laying the Bill ou your Lordships' table, and praying leave that it may now he read a first time.— , Hear, hear, hear.) The Earl of ELDON said he could not allow that op portunity to pass by without expressing his feeling that the Mune and the country were deeply indebted to the Noble Lord for the attention he had bestowed on a question of so couch importance, and still more for the able and eloquent manner is which he had brought it under their considera tion, and stated the grounds on which be relied for their concurrence.—( Hear, hear. )—He (Lord Eldon) thought he should stand justly charged with most unpardonable vanity, if, after the grave and weighty consideration which the Noble Lord bad bestowed on every part of the question, he should now presume to express any difference of opinion without maturely weighing and examining all the provisions of the Bill. One thing, however, ho might say now, and that was, that on the question of the law, as it applied to the cases stated by the Noble Lord, he (Lord Eldon) fully agreed witty the Noble Lord. All the points connected with the law of the case had been so fully and ably stated by the Noble and Learned Lord, that he had very, little to say, but he would observe, that it was the interest of all on whom the settlement of this important question depended to take c ire that there should he perfect unanimity.-- (ilear)—on all that was said and done connected with it. Under that persuasion he was confident that advice, from whatever quarter, would he well received and conscientiously acted upon. He should for the present content himself w;th expressing again his Concurrence in all that had heen said of the law of the case, and take a few days for delibe, ration before he offered any opinion on the details. The Bill, entitled " Au Act to provide for the Adnii. mistration of the Government of the country, i n t h e event of the demise of the Crown," was then read a first time, and the Hope immediately Adjourned. A greet number of their Lordships remained in the House after the departure of the Lord Chancellor, and collected in groups, apparently for the purpose of ex posing their opinions an tie provisions of thellith • HOUSE OF COMMONS, MoNlimr, Nov. 15. The SPEAKER informed the House that be had re. mired a letter from Mr. Hodgson, itating that he did not intend to proceed with his petition cotnpltining of an undue election for Wigan. The petition was accordingly discharged. Petitions complaining of the undue return of Members were presented from Galway (County), Carrickfergus, Seaford, Duinharton, County of Clare, Truro, Linbth gew, and the City of Durham. Ordered to be considered in January next. A petition was presented against the Game and Corn Laws, - - A great number of petitions were presented from dif fereat.plaers, praying fur ilia Abolition of Negro Slavery, Several M mauls took tl.eir oaths anti their seats. .COAL TRADE. Petitions praying for the repeal of the duty upon sea borne coals were presented from Ipswich, by Mr. R. Amnia ; from the coal•owners cn the Tyne, by Me. BM ; and from Sheeprbead, in Lanctukhire, ley Mr. Evalol. The last petition also prayed for a repeal of the game and corn laws, and a Reform in Parliament. Mr. EVANS in presenting- it, expressed bit anxiety tb.tt ste decision upon the proposition respecting reform, to be submitted on Tuesday night, would hold out greeter hopes of relief to the people than was to be derived from the declaration of his Onto of Wellington, lie trussed also that the corn laws and taxes pressing on the im'orer orders would be repealed, end be would have no objection to see a property tax levied in their stead. IRISH LANDLORDS. Mr. O'CONNELL presented s petition from two pa. Haws in the county of Westmeath, complaining of die• tress, praying for the intrialuction of poor inveigh. Log against the arbitrary conduct of the Duke of Buck. inght;M's agent, accusing him of endeavouring to sweep the people off the lamb—and declaring that with this view be had sought to denounce them ne belonging to the society of Ribmdmen. The Marquis of CHANDOS, he reply, contradicted all the assertions set forth in the petition, and said it,wea for tunate that the gentleman alluded to WWI in town to defend hims e lf from the charges preferred against him. He de nied that the land was overlet, and he stated that he had the authority of that gentleman for saying that he never had suspected the tenants on the estate of Ribbunistn, and that there had only been one case of a tenant having been ejected from the land, and that wee in consequence of his haying proere led upon false information, and .refusing to pay his rent without previously- lnwing a receipt. All the disturhances which had occurred in these parishes arose from the improper interferenee of the Priest and inflanima tory harangues delivered from the altar of the Chapel. A tenant, on being applied to lately for his rent, had refosial to pay it, de c l ar i ng t h at he had Iteeti osikae4 NPt to psy it by the Priett, 4nd that he eegv,hl snorter go through IteM fires lhrn dipbty ititißeverence..-(Hear, and a laugh.) In ;boa, the tenants had been encouraged to pay no rent so hong as the gentlemen alluded to continued agent. In con elusion, he exprelied his hope that the Learned Gentle 7 than would fur the future examine the truth tie oertions made in petitions before latiptante4 Ow to the ljouse..,.(Laud cheerk if00,N14414, aaid, that having ascertained the sig. natures to the petition were genuine, he considered it w.mld he unjust in him not to present it. He trusted that he had not gone beyond his duty in presenting it i a awl ha stated that he had not been wanting in the Ikreper courtesy, as be had submitted the peticiu,t the"inspettion of the, nearest relativiui tiae 'Hon. Marquis with whom he was eNuainted. As to what had 601 antled by his aracee agent respecting the Parish Priest, he (Mr, o:c\ - muctl) must say that he considered him I,itcepa4l;;; a. the to - nuttier t im P ut4 to hi," l ,, and LA -3' an that before long ne nn.ol L44* a petition fron t ' th a t R e verend. Perso n i n denial of it. Lord NUGENT confirmed the T.earned (IrAtkonan i s atatenieut. The Hon, and I.eartwd Nember Inc Water. find eel Lib*ly had aeut tite petition, and he I I" conuttuniilAtO the content* of it to his Noble relative.. Ajr, 0 ;C0NNV.41.4 presenteil a . ►pc‘itiou, clg 114,i pariolt Cloinla pra:iu,,t foy a 4;4-pe ,I of the Wan. Nir• 11ADO,Y.PA ii;o.4ll‘eil 4i petition (VIM two pariihes t'4 " b ‘ s e "P l ' ti "ing of tiktrinia, told praying for a repe.il of the Malt Tax, and an i di ev i a tion anti reduction 01 N.. Assessed Taxes. Sir IL lII4RON presented a pohion from Poet Imough, againat Colonial! Waver'', RIDEAU CANAL. Mr. STANLEY, after pootpotiing his motion about the expenditure on the Pillow C 40411 to Monday next, or to whatever other day the Committee rnight - tiro sit, stated, that one of the Clothe of the Council 1)0 died PRICE ID. githlenly that day, and asked if there was any intention he part of Government to Owlish hi* place, which noo iselesi, although the possessor received 2,500 L a year? iSir 11, PEEL said he had not heard of the gentleman', loath until that moment, and had not, therefore, turnet is attention to the auhject. Mi. S. WORTLEY hoped,. although, the boor for public business hail not,yet arriVed;that be might be per atitted to postpone a Motion of his respecting the Porto Election, which stoat! for the 241 of December. He would oidly state his reasoni for claiming this indulgence. Mr. HUME spoke to order, and contended that peti. tions should have piecedence of all public hotlines* up ti live o'clock. Mr. SPEAKER said there was no ride without an ex ception, and that it was only for the (louse to see if th, present case wa sufficiently strong to justify a deviatioi from the general rule. Mr. C. 'WYNN thought that as the motion hail heel, .et down among the notices, it might tend to mildew! Hon Heinhers if any proposition respecting it were entertained 4efore five (1'4,4. Mr. S. WORTLEY hoped that he should he allowed to hring on the discussian of this matter among the rat mat. era of public busineSs. It was understood that the Hon. Member's wish would not be resisted, and the conversation dropped. SLAVERY. Lord FRANCIS OSBORNE. presented two petitions from the inhabitants of a parish in the isle of Ely, *gained the continuance of West India slavery. Similar petitions were presented from Bath, by General Palmer; from Luttetworth, in Leicestershire, by Mr. Leigh Keck; from Cockermouth, in Cumberland, by Sit J. Grisham ; front places iu Lime' LI, by Mr. Rice ; and from two dissenting congregations in Nottingham, by Mr. Detunan ; from Scarborough, Whitby, Swalhatn, and North Dalton, and some other places, by Lord Morpeth. Lord F. OSBORNE presented a petition from the in• habitants of Wisbeach, fur the repeal of the duty on coat. carried coaetwlse. REFORM. Sir J. GRAHAM presented a petition from the resident electors of Cockermouth, praying for reform in Parlia ment. He observed that they stated the power of election to be really vested in the non-resident voters, and declared that a Noble Lord, whom they designated by name, influ enced the election, contrary to an express resolution of the House of Commons Ott that subject. Sir G. MURRAY gave a notice for Friday, respecting financial affairs. He spoke in so very low a tone as to render it difficult even to catch the import of his notice. SPIRIT DUTIES: Mr. RICE presented a petition from Limerick, for the equalisation of the spirit duties. ELECTION PETITIONS, Petition* were presented from Mt.Schoirs, against the Londonderry election ; from Mr. Wells, against the Hunt• ingtion election ; from Mr. Alderman Thorp, against the Coleraine election ; and from (we believe) Mr. Tennyson, against the Stamford election. They were all ordered to be taken into consideration on the 4th of January neat. PROTESTANT SOLDIERS AND CATHOLIC WORSHIP. Lord MORPETH presented a petition from the minister and inhabitants of Boasincy. Lincolnshire, against cow. pellioog Proteritant soldiers in the British army, while on foreign service, to take part in the procession and public ceremonies of the Cathodic religion. The petitioners de clared, that such compulsion was an injury inflicted on tender consciences, and was, therefore, practice eon, &rimed by the Almighty himself. Lord Morpeth admitted that soldiers on foreign service ought not to Jim their die respect to the religion of the country in which they hap pened to he 'whined, hut he insisted at the same time, that, unless in case of absolute rieeettsity, they ought not to he compelled to join in any &elated mark of respect t it. Ile believed that this petition had .arissn, po gt, tug comegif •sholiteenteloeto atidolta, Ind 14e hail hi4r,ii , st tho seine compulsion which beau attempted to be eon filuyed in this case was employed in Corfu, and onto other of our garrisons. Sir d. MURRAY said, be believed in the first place that the petition was founded in miltake, for he bad :vas , son to suppose that us compulsion was ever used in order !to make Protestant soldiers , attend the religion, ceremonies of Catlinlies. He had the stronger reason for awning this to be his belief, since he had istely had a conversation with an officer from Corfu, who assured him that no com pulsion whatever had been used with regard to the soldier, attending any religious ceremony. Lord ADORPETH said' that if the Hight lion. Clln. tleman's belief was well founded, his explana►iou must of course be satisfactory. REFORM. Sir R. FERGUSON presented a petition from Cupar in favour of Reform in Parliament, and especially in fa. your of Reform in the Representation, or rather non-re presentation of the Scotch boroughs. Ile declared that he had been both asteui4ted and hurt et bearing that the Noble Duke had said, in *wilier plecC, that the country was satiafied with the present system, and that he W 44 not prepared to wee to any Proposition fur Ralhrm. If the Noble Duke really had cattle .any, such declaration, and supposed, bleti!, that the people were sati , fivd the present system, be (Sir R. Ferguson) ;mod say thst the Noble Duke was quite ignorant of the feelings of the people. By such a deoletation the people would not be stopped, but would }arm forward with double zeal in the cause of Reform; for he felt bound to say that, in his be lief, there was but one opinion as to the oeveistity of Re form front one rod of the kingdom to the other. Mr. KENNEDY said, that as this was the first peti. tion that had been presumed from Scotland on the Rohr ject, he must take the opportunity of obeerving, that he entreated the Ilouse to pay the utmost atteution to the wishes, of the people of Scotlend on the question of - Reform. This opinion wet firsoly settled on that question. Mr. R. FERGUSON prevented a petition, front Durle. ton against slavery. Mo. HUME promoted six petitions, front Perth, Ar broath, Brechin, and Stockport, for Reform and Retitle- titan of Taxation. The Hon. Member observed that three petitions were most respectably signed, but he believed that some of the photos from which they. were *lot would send no more, unites Ministers exhiltited a dispositiou to 4441 relief to the petitioners. He declared (list the universal wish of the people of Se,,tlauti was feint the bailot. Mr. DIINDAS denied that any such feadiog existed is Scotland in favour of the ballot. He dett;0111, t 4 iia that they wished the reform of which the Om. Member hid t liked ; he absolutely denied ‘14,1 they wanted reform in the representation...4A 14000...41i least that was not the genert.4l (414 ip Svoibinfi. Mr,llslsEDY should he perfectly contented 14 that question was to be decided by the exprostim t$ opinion that the I , etitions to that House wankd dis46o. Sir C. FORBES was mularAtoo44 to soy that Brachio, which bad returned biota. Atember (Mr, flume) to the four last rariiamenta, was the most corrupt of Scotch Ur. HUME answered that the majority of Oa three, and that having Montrose and Artarnath with hint, he only wanted Breehitt to complete that mtjotity. in that way Brechin had cetwasal him to Perliatueot. lie denied, howeve.i, that It had ever done an corruptly, at o ri salt thai it the lion. Baronet had umirritutal ‘l4l.rtde 61 simple arithmetic he had mentioned...4A laugh)—the lion. Hamlet would not have wets the attack rir the burgh of Hrechin. Tile Hon. Mernher for E4linhurgh had deniedliK; the people in Edinburgh wanted e i lovc 4 in i;e44lllf4i, He would air the lion. Aleinkle.";. ;, he had courage to risk the deciaion of that 4,,,e5t10n by a IL,Hot of the people of Scotland ?....ef,iitaar, hear.) if the people . of Edinburgh votect %y ballot, the lion, Member. who now sat in *,hat House Mr ;heat city would be tart i,st man who would represent the people of that oity...„(Ue a r, he.ar, and a lough.) The. lima, &leather spoke the opinions of the thirty Of (WAX men by whom he was returned, but, not of the 1401,0001nlorbitorts whom he pretended to re. iirrimit, but who bad no vote in his sletitit.M. It cuts shameful hint on the character of that Honor. that among curl, a population there should ho hut so few voter t. Mr. DUND.kkattid the Hon. Member fur Middiesca was miutaten, when he Said that there wars only forty etrotors fur Edinburgh, but he hum nothing of the Con stitution of Edinburgh, and .therefor. 4 lw wadi bold mew. trim's. It was ignorance thAt , made him bolil laugh.) —Among his (Mr, Hondas'„) ntectote, were fourteen per sons who ware chosen by the people, at elders or (ra con., and Vila Wkltt 4 Intithe election as far as it went. (f.sintliter-) Sir J. tiltAllAllt observed, that although ht niiBhi be aril of the ectiture of the Hun, Nirtuter oppo. . . site, for his ignorinsi exhibited lo what he WWI kliOtlt to 'ay, he could not avoid feeling a wish to *tate ono fact on thin subject. The lest time teat the people of Scotland had the opportunity of protiontwiN their opinion on the position of Reform W4O in the year 1 t326, whets tic pre 4ent Chief II trou o f Sentient! brought that question under the consideration of the house. The people of Spoletod then showed that there were itt Edinburgh 1,0 000 ,persons rated to the.entillal amount of M., and that, alterdellue.t. ing the timber of women and other persons unqualified to vote, there remained 7,246 househo'ders who segued a petition to that l'lonse, praying that Pit.liatnent would eter the mote of election for Sentlentl—(llettr, bear.)— fhe 110 n. Mc...miter for Foliuhttrgh would find the greatest liflieulty in produ c i ng p et i t i ons from Scotland, with or without, the ballo, that shituld cxpr ss the opittiou of the ,tettple, sensing with th e sentiment d eclare(l hy,the Duke If W.-Wrote), that his itnaginetiou cou'd not Conceive a systetn so perfect as that whi4f.WaS f-: , 4t4h1i0411 in the United Kingdom. He was sure that the Hon. Member for },:dinbureli would, not find five hundred people ill s'eut land who would go even thet length with hint,-,-(Hear, neer)--or who would pretend in any way to entdicate the present mode of returning Members. With regard to the inyetitication and craft of returning' .4f t oilets, 6,1 had been alre a dy w e ll expose d b y other ., awl he'll of only to say, that, in his opluito, however ,bigh the tone or tughty the determination expressed on t!tie subject, the Government would find they couhl not coot:owe this cor rupt %Hem against the moderate but ii ii Niel nide, Nal lentrools fo Reform that Refor that were .uttered by the 1c of this empire.—( Hear, hear.) Mr. KENNEDY said that the Corporation by which the Hon. Member fur Edinburgh watt returned, coneistid of thitty-three patrons, and the tleetion of fourteen of them, it was true, did pstticipste iosonte degree of a popular election—hot niorterrt out of the thirty three were self-elected, an that the whole,fattriefue,fittpulai i election' which the intaginatfon of the Hon. 4letither far Elio, burgh Itad erected, at twee fell to the Ornmd. Mr. DUNDAS offitsnottl that it tamed where it did. Fourteen of them persons Were popularly elected, and they eumluced to the election of the lathers. Air. amid that the (..:.'eton4.,,inihteueeti,the elec tion of the whele thirtylbree, c u d that the people of Edinburgh had no more to tri er!; the slecttion of the Hon. Members than had 'the people of Apo. Mr. DUNDAS said that the fourteen had a share in the election ,-.(A laugh,) The petitions were mil soil laid on the table. A Message yeas received from the Lords requesting Copies of the Reports. of the Contemns' Committeee on the sultject* of Tobacco, the state of the Poor in Ireland, and of the tail Trade. —Wet ed. FORFAR, &c., ELEC,I'ION. Mr, S. WOItTLEY, after *wise remark* up,,n the peculiar circumstances of his case, 44 sitting. Member for the district of boroughs, Forftr, Perth, tit. Andrew's, Cutter, and Dundee, moved that the consideration of the Election Petition against hint should be postponed front the 211 Decemlotr to some future day. Sir C, FORBES opposed the motion, so diluting that the matter in dispute lay ,in a Ofitsliell, and that the Hon. :timber would not be able to maintain hie salt for fire minutes after the mettiug of the Committee to try the question. Sir AL W. RIDLEY wai iu faronr of delay, and re cotnutentled farther, that ad the election petitions, hitt those where double returns hail been made, should be post paned until after the holidays, which it was titolerstuo were to last for a mouth or six week'. Mr. EItItGIIiiSON rootentletl that the HonouraWe Gentleman (Mrs S. Wortley) had Lid no special circum stance* before the. House to warrant a ilep Irony front the general redo its applied to OpFtiou peOtirqn, Mr. W. WYNN, would, have consented tit: A Motion tic defer the consideration of the petitimi'in istikostiol l fur a few .yto r he argued that it wee one of the earliest duties of the Hone° to use ertain !eho ought, or ought not to sit as its Metnhers, and that it wank operate ntitst unjustly to the parties if election petitions generally went postponed. until after the holiday's. After a few worth front Mr. C. PIit.HANI and Mr- 8 - ‘Votret.tre, the Gallery, WA* cleared for a division, but we believe that none took-Once, and %Lit S. w in tley withdrew his motion, INCENDIARIES. Mr.. H. SITAINIT (tes tiorto as the CiaNei was re opened) cola to put a (11101 , tion. to the Hight fat in ,,,asbl e Secretary for the Hume Department, relative to the bacon. diary proceedings in several of the Home Counties. They had istottnencril in Kent, tool lout loom alarmingly ex tended id last (sit the understood die Hot,. Gentleman) to the county to whtch he lasluoged (Stirrer), 'Ube Mit gitoreatre believed, that at present Hooey had 'not soilicient Pon e r :to StY#o4,l fn epeeist tweet-at/ea they could cua)y swear them in When tumults told oteurred, and thou only locally. Tile lion. Member theesfore suggestyd that a k•hort Hill for a short berm tuiglot he advantageously brought in to constitute a constabulary force to pet form the duty of watch sod ward, by which a great dritl of mischief might be toevented. Ile wished to kuow, theft*. fore, whether the flight llott. Gentleinat: lad taken into his consideration spy measure Of that nature, or any other that Might bq efrectuel for the end itt view? Siellolll3,ltT ITEL—I can *setae tbe Hon. Aletubee that four or fire hours net' every flay of my life are spent in endeavouring to diseurcr the perpetrature of these atrocious crimes. I know that voluntary ateociationa have been formed to establish watch and ward in many 'threatened situations; and I helieve that Nothing but extraordinary local vigilance will provide effectual sictirity against 'titer , ibominable offenders. No military facie, no yeomanry force. can, I am afraid, defeat tbs wicked designs of moos who have tonne ulterior tt:iject ire view heyoud the mere redresa.of a boost evil that 'firmly believe. If any melt sure eon be, suggested, by farming loyal amaciatiOns, or otherwise, for which the assistance of Parliament or of Government may be necemany, 1 he most litypy to give it every possible cosaideratiou. I am perf e ctly car., gain that there is no plan, promising to be efketual, this Rouge would not cheerfully sanction its older to t ee .. 'aloes) a system to disgraceful. The hotfoot will not require me to disclose the measures I ant adopting to detect the perpetrators__to at) so WOOl4 t efr<tt the object itself.— (Hear, hear.)—Nu expense, no exertion on hi, part, has beets spared to bring these inigititons petsetta to justice.-.-. If any dittletklty slntult grille in forming voluntary assoeia • thole, or in swearing in special ounatables, the House will, in I have said, be ready to sanction any toads of temoving that difficulty, and j may add, for myeelf, that I will give any r proposition 44 most willing attention. Mr. 11,8IITMAN oleterved that as the law stood at pre. sent, isottoial cnostuhles might he sworn in by Magistrates. fiir nollEitT PEEL, referred to the Statute of the fast Geo. IV., which enabled Magistratei to appoint special constables 41114101' certain circumitimees. He slid not know that it applied to cases where those was us mere appro.. I motion of tumult. lir. DENISON—Att I /wee the honour to sit hero for iety 41 , ' thin s Surrey, I may, perluslot with paw t oi pot toothy of soyiog that I dtrply ltanetit, in einuntuit with toy Ftiout (if he wild allow tiie to call hint so), the eytlsta which during the theta rata nights hare tiii.graced tint County. Whethey the plait 'suggriiteil he the best I ttannot *low ileri4l but that' mane phut ought to be stlopted to vti dorett thtsiti ationiinatile outrages, as this Right klorti Secretary justly`ralbt them ', prompt)). and de _ eisively, is quite Eitlir. At to the spirit of the roomy. over which I hav e rereut ly trave ll et l, I most deny its ions, that there it anything approaching dialoyalty among any clam of the inhabitants ; they ere attached' to the Monarchy and Li the ,noun.},; WI that they' are aatititett with the King's Alittistert I will by nu mount take upon me to affirun.,--(11w, lent.) —The dittottlatitstion hat hero in creAtesi Is 7 the speenh reestutiy pot into hie Majesty's tuouth,and itill more by the extritordinary utul uneallrtt i()C ijetihratiUll of the Dtilto of Wellington itt the other lino*. _ . , T i b t.nt o il pe illt o ri pl 4 o 44l :ll n n iti t ttit o it e lftr ywoei . :; ) Blau di4a isAeil with the I , :ep"fitiot , re urtliuq tbe List. Let the Itig))* lluiik. tionticloAn ree , ahtet that to put An Old to this opirit, Minieictie Hoot both vetronelt anti refoun...they molt trl,e.%t teoxi a, and consent to that a k aag o i n the rtproieutet:i4o which ii retinited by the col'. i .,, et i nitt , th a t have etept into it. Aline oil, let illinisters repeal thy itivsni upon productive litilitetry, and hit line/- lords Wiwi: their rents 1 and istiners will then be able tri give snob wages to thrir labourers as will rumble them to support their families. At all event., ti very body Will WM that the prevailiog outrages must Are terminated speedily Ana effectually. Uv. jillAlE—Arrougemente tor establishing asaiscii e . thane flit stif•ilefeuce have, 1, kisOW, Wen made in severni l3ittt, of the county of Micktiex ; 111441 in tbeivarisit tai St. Aime, LimeLmoto. 40 a meeting convened by edverthos meat, the foll.4w . ianj resolution was very recently adopted' ;_,•, ti t\ declare to the titet place, in the most 1101,11101 iii4itner, our firm and ilev nted loyalty to our Most exert scut King, ,and our attachment to the.,pcinciples of the Conetitutiottp owl to the ititcreti end po hits,! inetitutione of our coootry% 4 ' .assonosing, in our propel ty, sand In our faassailliot, ass CONUiVOO4I stoke in that pratiosa , 4-;ou of io-Bari outer, w* &close our rcatltnaNs a at loiy 41.4 tvery 114-km - .1, CJ tAtVi Our Otitiotit *Matta. for the sayiat..*,i,,a oaf tooth atatalay— it.nd for the protraatitan per,antroa WO lit Ittio* V hut We 4*, ;I:. • tV