The Sun. — London, England, 1833-02-23 00:00:00

~amea * . cteol that ! I ` o , 0 'xpected the if o tbit e r. of th, proof 0 ,0 sent all io d into St. 1201 e 'n ary rao sl3re 7 11 / e 4 not give` !we n if it 114' I%luniciP as to all 0 ": 17 4d tp be 1: 001 on'. I d l p atch to the eiveol r Govern ' , O f ee p 5 7 .0g e onid not such P et)tj o furtPe r" Fro ,f ilfr. • - thy t n sidero d n f theit i • re t, ieq tion bet her erelY ` rice to be ,pet ° :0 0. orpor), 1t That . 04 0 1 C' , e their t V veil te nd6l usi t thi , °: t the 50'1` . 44 ( i it i b i ti: etit i re n th ffi ) :i : .: nl y , ,p - . 1 1 1.. I r e . a hm i , , i l n isi lt .ii l p i p e ha lac; noltffil I -T):.e.aa:l,ls, Tailors' o c f m s m ti p n a k n in y g i fi n sh i i I ; and most he subject . c Woe„N, nt rY•which is extended to the rest. The former dar e f ro Y nkd raised the price of admission to their free iti4 i p :',"S 4d. to a l4s. If asked the reason of this, - fiktii.... - "say they did it net of poverty—from their .44 1 4' iind drinkings ; these expenses and 011 their ac- Le 4 1 4 .4 to be examined into from their own hooka. k e giliri,,,r2 . ttee Would stultify itself by confining their ep t ( 8. "" the limits proposed by the lion. Member for wi l , A . ' E. linatchbuli). its `l-31CROIIBIE ~ vi Q" s rose to make a few . observa 'we la it n 'Peet to his own views on the subject. For Person, frock he had been constantly engaged in receiving . 4 iN ii . alt parts of the kingdom, all strongly urging k4l hi. '''Y ' nt ° the state of Corporations. The qviestir fief h. " I °4 in agitation in several towns, and was, in "ol ' hi enn te a subject of extreme and general interest, !Iti reci t n'iled With g l reat delight ' the motion for the so -1'44'41144Y. The first difficulty which he saw at ot"whetreatenin the Committee, was that they would be ' 1 408,4 o .4 ' e d I .y the extreme multiplicity of the business Nth , r i them by; the resent plan. He should suggest 41.6,..1d be mud better to confine their labours to /t ad te'.llT)rc .iminediattly important, and most likely to Was ' tO ""d 'ltelY beneficial results. The present r . . k its or- fi nd °tit what were the defective or vicious Ntie up t a he t lstem, anti to remedy them. If gentlemen . !CI th e to press as they had done for tie investigation thor,lo—edifferent Corporations' accounts and expense., Ai t /7 14 he no end to the labours of the Committee. t.441(113:41. Algainsit. said the proper course . he thought t b ill of , t ° a scertain the original foundation and institti ,4„.."rPorations, and then to find out how far they 4(4 Ad toil from this their original institution. As the ftsn,;''''oeate on a former occasion had stated, with re !illst4 t° • eotland, all Corporations were once con „l4tii,r, the Same system, that is, under the manage -7,44,,dt:c Whol e of the burgesses. As to the meaning of irlik .11.enicinal, all Corporations were or iginallyTrading '4il et % ' lnre they were Corporations ; and the Merchant , L EIO 4 *he'll:l3May Was, therefore, a Municipal Corpora 'nit rs — all Charters they were originally called Met.- ' i t ~ ,t rilds . Eltp o r t !, 4 , MES said there would be no opposition from "eleg 7 °41 to every inquiry, and instanced the Corpo trtheni` Carlisle as about to send in a petition in ftvotir t it , puiry. ktr k; I(N ATCHHULL withdrew his motion. 1 ) 144 ,„: 1 Y t '. O ' i t A TTWOOD, after replying at some • length, ti% ti th flame tenor as on Thursday, said he should l: n - 1 eeling of the House, and withdraw his roo- f " u tttil er t e l a thfg that the Corporation be was a member o • the strictest inquiry into all their proceedings. Petit. On VOTE BY BALLOT. ,:I4r,„"oTE postponed from Thursday, the Vitt!! of 11- '2 ": to Thursday, the 25th of April, his motion . l'll itte tb ,, - ,,, v ,tnes at elections ' for Members td serve in • )4 "" be taken by way of ballot. t o ad ISUNI) ERSTANDING IN THE HOUSE. I ALTR oRp 1 addressed the Speaker, and said, , ttil tio f° ," the House separated rated he wished to call its at. th. "44 11.° a eir cumstance p whieh had taken place in the ' 1 11:1• 1 t ' e evening. In the course of the debate upon 4,4 1 .1 0 , _, ite °T the Hon. Member for Middlesex for a thik,, tthrtittee to examine . into and report upon the 4 -. 't ''' M embers of Parliament who held offices, places, e 0 43(1 t! 11 : 1 1. ents under the Crown, stone expressions had Ir t* th . t'd - " j ells he understood, were likely to lead to clitnieerneene hich the House was always most 4 1, 4 I:l4l.jutb, eq to w avoid. Under there circumstances, 41,4 4 4 l 'oulf to the notice of the House, without 4 , a nY communication with ether of the lion. fin". . ° , w honl he was now compelled more specifically s b „, ll-11 .k . '3,4 having heard the expressions used by the caotittelher for Middlesex that evening with respect to D ' i 11,4,, , r. of the army as held seats in that House, he i tm 4 i bi Z to state that those expressions cast a strong 8. t il t: : 1.4 1 11 th 1 ! the motives by which those officers were at iL6 ; lir Plib'ic couct in that House. At the same ,s7kil felt bonn I to admit that the Hon. Member for t 41 11% t,, " h e! fairly stated that he did nut intend his ex siteNjot me any individual application.--( , Hear, hear.) 'Ldon istli, a of that kind, bowel', r, were calculated to ex itt 16 Which led others to use expressions still more i Vtt l il i ' In the course of the discussion strong )- I ,o' ' ) , ll ,.„'en dby an Hon. and Gallant Officer. the 11;11-sif'f'"lotiuc'esterand had been retorted by the Hon. 1n 41 , 1 , 1, -4 Itlicitile.ex.—(Hear.) Under such circum 4:N44Le (Lott' • Al - thorp) appealed to the Hun. Member -11 ' al,"a himself. From long experience of the lai,,N,:ehee's Parliamentary conduct, he (Lord Al. %1 -44 satisfied that he (Mr. Hume) had not in- I N '' giv 1 / 4 * hi.l, 5 anY man personal offence by the observa 6:for,`"' he had employed. He (Lord Alihorp) was city.lie"tifident that the Hon. illemb-r would express thin4l44 ith respect to the words which he hid ut *ir. Wi t h v . ing back the expressions of the Gallant tt o lt. 41 3 ,,t-"ttern pt. -.4 !fear. ) . . tl'ltt . h " . ',.E - -1 can have no hesitation in stating . my 144 ,si t - e t wivit took place, and in showing ha on -4 7 itki• 4 ' for me to have intended personal offence . ON, ivid ua ,....._ ( Hear, hear.) I stated certain tiru ' ti . tid e" ' W hich I said :itched suspicions in my mind, t 1i1,,,"" that I hoped that no expression of mine wou ld ttit,tf e te r , t° any individuil. The Hun. and .Gallant t ~ In,' 4014 kd oucester, in referring to what I said, observed hsi,'''t t4:(litthonoura'ble opinion as I . a appeared to enter tOtt nl kers of the army mutt a rise from a c . onv . ic• to ' , .. ( 4 Part that I should act so were I in their situ 1 44 t..' ''"*, hear.) That was imputing . a motive *44 11 7 course which, in itself, is unpathamenta!y. 4 i ' to said that I threw back the insinuation ki,, , h 4 t ,i t4 ''',Pts Conreopt was the cord I used. It 4 11; i 4 n1' 6 444 Ought never to he used in Parliament, t '`s(ll, 4 "ells and in my opinion always impro- S. km ,°ri hear.) I thought at the time that the /11‘ittit,,,"'illiint Officer, in throwing cut an imputation kltttotive jusoi fi ed me in using the expressio lyit ''', hut I meant nothing more by it than to set iit - ' , i ( t i.; irl my own opinion, and in the opinion of the Ptitii).,,Car, hear)—and I therefore appeal l toyou, i iittkg Il:: whether, after guarding myself as did, by Vial ' did not mean my expressions to have any t filL i S imaPPlieatien, the lion. and Gallant Officer was titStel l ' " i ng motives to me ?—(Hear.) I never wish 4, ot i'th any man--I never wish to give any mail h ut tk t hw t l e i ne e•--(Hear, hear.) Those with whom %CU termseed on e in this House, I have always met on tleth on. the other side of that door. Like os .q, W e h ,'W, h save battled our points warmly, and some "Ittittk'‘4"::P° angrily ; but when the argument was 4 i,i'ls ' t ' t ot ' t hsubsided, and we met on friendly . and file!l'ltth,:"n '.--(Hear, hear.) I had no intention, by 4,i t '° ,l s this evening, to offend any man, but in illeiiti6tale Morneht I retorted with w d ar e in x i c l u%, n b • le i . .la f 04 4 , \ n le, may perhaps be consid • 4 p:tit e J NiNktunelusion of this speech there was a loud cry . .ittiikt4; h erkele • but as he did not come forward, it d eep hp - Z Rrante 3 d that be had left theHous,) *1 4'4. 44 41.a A kER was sure that the House . felt itself " n rk ki ., - - tt, ;-ted to the Noble Lord for having done that . ,4e6 f: - 4 n S n 'al on the present occasion, and which, 4 101; 4 111 '° i 4 . tte u " i - ti t d l ividual so peculiarly entitled by his , l ' t h l';htl,: e trilier, and his character to interpose, was r 74 11 ;_ 6 -11, 4E 1 the two Hun. Members back to a right 1 41 1; ( 1t - ,P" , aon a l offence was not intended on either 11 `01 4 . 11 4 'k ' hear.) He regretted that the Hon. and 0C) for Gloucester was not at that moment in 11N o — kW stoicwas perfectly well aware of what the Hon. es, boor h ad t liddlesex had stated, that in using the ex 1.N4i1 q not meant any personal offence to the elle) tiad°halat Alt-oilier for Gloucester. He(the t lli k titi t it tf heard the expressions to which the Noble t S l i s,7loh l lj tl eda and he confessed that, if his memory ilk: th t )•Z when he heard them, be took the meaning . tlie l lw t ; 4 t hi the the Hon. Member should treat . insintra -44t4 4 t o .lll4 tif With the same contempt with whici t i P(4ll,'lde.rtnsed to be made by him were received a tik ie lt . Ns,,, t le (the Speaker) had not interfered . at the Nli:,tiNittititig4sneNly backward in doing so, lest his inter. , P L i tis ta t t ttev k ,, t !°d to create the offence which he was nit 1, - 40% -,' The attention of the House having been atai r ,"t 4 tat tiNiorly lie must say that they had been ex :ht ii 4 4 4 4 4 o alt:•Niern ber for Middlesex, who had declared_ l 'i s ° Pe ' , :ltte"h t no personal offence against the Hon. - tit 44 t o it s t a le fur Gloucester. With that explanation li t I P. h4 f liii.iedr and if the House was satisfied, it 11 °U .I * 1!: 4 1 4 "... t hut the proudest and . m . ost gallant man ' It' t hh, tii n ,;" tot object to their decision.— (Cheers. ) the, e - oth t m ih, uttatt,d dial not meet the feeling of the 1 , 44 4 t l' h t l4 41 ,,G ' n '''' , e would be justified in sending for i' e ti A - , 44 11 k : 4 1 4 " at it Mel -fiber for Gloucester, and taking atr:rstkh.•444, the tiecasi n mi lit call fur; but after Artist c give'''. iL4,,,aPPeared°to h m g. that the worda of the sio h ; Ptlj,ptl, einii°loldlesex, followed by the explanation t I. Il t ii "he ~„`I he construed only in that way which h i, I. q.Pti'so4-',(Nt l iortourable mind from the impres -I,'N. andLkNll,cfLnce Was intended.—(Hear.) it ," V4l i O. j' l3) ( co ld say, in the absence of t° I ; l)4l 't t ti q l 1) 1 , 14 ' hela t i t i ye not tbis feelings were, but g ' oo ' f 1.4. 1 . 1 1° 1 •1 4 , e-4 , ''' cleat!): expressed from the chair, t''''tlt h 1 ''"!f 14 4 ' his Hon. and Gallant Friend ought k. t° tb:kt4Lii:, for Z,1.Y., 8 3tisfioi. It was true that the 'iletz i b e "; u. 4 40,1 t,"QtBaX had used the expres , ion at e lt,Ti l d qbal` b 44 apologized to the House, but not A 4-4 C a ' but now that the Hon. ~,tzt Captain ; ltd declared that he bad not meant any personal offence, be was sure, if he knew his Hon. and Gallant Relative, that he would feel perfectly satisfied An HoN. MEMBER, whose name we could not I. , arn, concurred in what fell from the Noble Lord who hod just sat down, and expressed his belief, that when his Hon and Gallant Friend, the Member for Gloucester, should be apprised of what had now passed, he would fee! him self quite s4tisfied. Here the matter dropped. The House then adjourned, at half-past ten o'clock, to Tuesday next. THE KING'S LEVEE. Yesterday his Majesty held a Court and Levee, which was very numerously attended. A few minutes after two o'clock arrangements were made for receiving the address from the Convocation of the Clergy in the province of Canterbury, which had been voted in Convo cation in the Jerusalem Chamber. The procession was pre ceded by the Officers of the Convocation, followed by his Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bishop of London, the Bishop of Llandaff, the Bishop of Winchester, the Bishop of Bangor, the Bishop of LichSeld and Coventry, the Bishop of Hereford, the Bishop of Bristol, the Bishop of Chichester, the Dean of Westminster, the Rev. Dr. Russell, and Archdeacon Watson. The deputation was introduced by two Gentlemen Ushers in Waiting, makingtheir obeisances. His Majesty was seated on his throne, in a military unifonn, attended by the Marquis of Winchester, the Earl of Albemarle, two of the Great Officers of State, Lord Byron (as the Lord in Waiting), and Sir Joseph Whatley '(as the Groom in Waiting). The Hon. Corps of Gentlemen Pensioners lined the Throne Room. The Archbishop of Canterbury read the address, which was of con. siderable length, and related to the assembling of the new Par liament. The King returned a gracious answer. The depu tation then retired, and proceeded to the Jerusalem Chamber, where the Convocation was prorogued. Shortly after the King held a Levee, and gave audiences to the following Ambassadors and Ministers :—The Prince de Talleyrand, on his return from France ; the Baron de Cetto, to deliver a letter from the King of Bavaria ; the Count Bjornst jerna and Senhor de Gorostiza, on their return, Namick Pacha, Minister from the Sublime Porte, on delivering his credentials ; Monsieur Moreno, Minister Plenipotentiary from the Republic of the United Provinces of La Plata, to deliver his credentials. At the Entree Levee were— The Russian, French, and Turkish Ambassadors ; the Nea politan, Bavarian, Prussian, Swedish, Wirtemberg, Mexican, Hanoverian, Belgian, Saxon, Brazilian, Buenos Ayres, and Hanse Town Ministers; the Baron de Wessenberg, the Aus trian Minister on a Special Mission ; the Sardinian, United States, Austrian, Netherlands, and Spanish Charges d'Affaires; the Baron Ralamb, the Secretary to the Swedish Embassy ; Mons. Mavrojeni and the two Secretaries to the Turkish Em bassy; the Secretary to the Neapolitan Embassy; and Count Dunhoff, Secretary to the Prussian Embassy ; the Lord Chan cellor, the Lord President, the Lord Privy Seal, the First Lord of the Treasury, the Secretaries of State for the Home, Foreign, and Colonial Departments, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the First Lord of the Admiralty, the Paymaster of the Forces, the Postmaster-General, the Secretary of State for Ireland, the Master of the Horse, the Groom of the Stole, the Master_ General of the Ordnance, the Captain of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen Pensioners, the Captain of the Yeomen Guard, the Deputy Great Chamberlain, the Vice-Chamberlain; Lord Hill, Gold Stickin Waiting; the Master of the Rolls, the Chief Judge of the Bankruptcy Court, the Attorney-General, the Treasurer of the Household, the Comptroller of the Household, the President of the Board of Trade, the Chamberlain and Vice-Chamberlain to the Queen, the Clerk Marshal, Mr. Chief Justice Jeffcott (Sierra Leone) ; Mr. C. Wood, Secretary to the Treasury ; Sir Peter Laurie, Lord Mayoi ; Mr. Sheriff Hum phery, Mr. Sheriff Peek, Mr. Under-Sheriff Filcher, Mr. Under_ Sheriff Stammers, Deputy-Lieutenant Lawrie; Sir Henry Hal. ford, President of the Collegeof Physicians; Sir Astley Cooper, Surgeon to the King; the Secretary at War; Sir Ralph Big_ land, Garter King at Arms; Sir William Woods, Claren cieux King at Arms; Sir Augustus Clifford, Usher of the Black Rod ; the Dean of Hereford, Deputy Clerk of the Closet ; Mr. Under (Foreign) Secretary Backhouse ; the prin cipal Chaplain to his Majesty's Forces; the Master of the Robes ; the Surveyor-General of the Board of Ordnance; Mr. Meek, Comptroller of the Victualling Board ; Colonel Bowater, Equerry in Waiting ; Colonel Lygon, Silver Stick in Waiting ; Mr. Burge, Agent for Jamaica; the Deputy Master of the Trinity House; Lord Saltoun, Field Officer in Waiting. His Majesty gave audiences to— The Marquis of 'Winchester, Earl Grey, Viscount Mel bourne, Viscount Palmerston, Lord Cadogan, Sir James Kempf, Sir James Graham, the Earl of Albemarle, Lord Hill, and Vis. count Exmouth, when the Noble Viscount returned the ribbon of the Bath worn by his late father: The Dean of Hereford, on his appointment as Deputy Clerk of the Closet, was presented by the Lord Chamberlain. The Rev. T. F. Foord Bowes, upon his appointment as Su. pernumerary Deputy Clerk of the Closet, was presented by the Lord Chamberlain. The following were present at the general Levee : DUKESCleveland, Dorset, Argyll, Northumberland, MARQUISES—Stafford, Thomond, Camden, Cholmon. deley. EARLS—Amherst, Denbigh, Cadogan, Kinnoul, Rosslyn, Jersey, Harrowby, Fingall, Cawdor, Oxford, Cornwallis, Lei trim, Uxbridge, Selkirk, Kerry, Mount Norris, Surrey, Charle mont. VISCOUNTS—Ashbrook, Beresford, Exmouth, Howick, Villiers, Strangford. LORDS—Byron, Saltoun, Farnborough, Cowley, Stuart de Rothsay, Wharncliffe, Lovaine, Lilford, Grantham, Burghersh, Erskine, Grey of Groby, Elphinstone, S. Osborne, W. Fitzroy, Kilmaine, Mahon, Hotbam, M. Hill, Cloncurry, Suffield, Western, Polti lore, Waterpark, J. Churchill, Colchester, Beverley, A. Lennox, Auckland. RIGHT HONOURABLES—George Dawson, Sir Robert Peel, T. Erskine. HONOURABLES—F. Pelham, Henry Arundell, F. L. Browne, Rev. H. D. Erskine, F. Villiers. Baron de Bode. SIRS—R. Keane, Bart., H. Bridges, R. Acton, A. Cooper, J. Becket, J. Hanmer, Walter Scott, M. S. Stewart, Edmond Hayes, M.P., R. Dobson, F.. Tucker, K.C.8., J. Rudsdell, H. Nicholas, J. Webb, R. G. Russell, F. Fowke, Moris Ximenes, Chas. Wetherell, Alexander Johnston, Charles Bagot, Charles Aldis, George Shee, G. Staunton, Peter Laurie, Ralph Bigland, F. Hamilton, Bart., J. Pechel, J. Gibbons, W. Burnett, D. Barry, R. Kennedy, C. Douglas, James South, C. M. Clarke, Bart., M. Ridley, H. Bethune, R. Fitz Wygram. BISHOPS—Bath and Wells, Rochester. ARCHDEACON Potts, Rev. Dr. Watson. REV. MESSRS—T. F. Foord Bowes, F. H. Canstcm, new. land Curtois, Charles E. Birch, Joseph Marshall, J. S. M. An derson, Bray, P. Bastard, J. B. Robinson, A. Hamilton. DOCTORS—CIark, Aldis, Sigmond, Locomb. MESSRS—FeIix Booth, Brent, William O'Reilly, M.P., Burge, Beltz, R. Keate, Maxwell, Samuel Spry, M.P., Tarle ton, Cox, Barrow, Gordon, Ashley, Mayne, Throckmorton, Halford, M.P., Tubbs, B. C. Brodie, J. Thackent, Andrews, St. John Baker, C. Cavendish, Laurie, Gillon, M.P., Pulman, Vandiest, C. Wood, MP., Steuart, M.P., Henry Ellis, R. Fitz patrick, B. Constable, Hope, Halswell, H. Ross, M.P., Platt, Neave, Hall, B. Paget, J. Arnott, Hamilton, F. A. Grant, Ken nedy, Meek E. Ricketts,. Aubrey, C. Smith, Blackstone, M.P., Platt, Samuel Platt, Rev. 11. Cust, Sutherland, Colquhoun, Beames, O'Callaghan, Merether, F. Hodgson, Bedingfeld, Dimsdale, Barrett, Ferguson, nr., R. C. Mellish, C. Cooper, Harris, L. T. Flood, N. Carlisle, W. 0. Carr, Fitzgerald, nr., Charles Scott, L. Watkins, M.P., H. C. Coape, S. Briggs, Chat. field, Swanston, \Vhiteshed, Bingham, Holland, Rice, C. Gore. ADMIRALS—Sir Charles Rowley, Sir George Martin, Sir Robert Otway, Sir Edward King, Sir Thomas Williams, Sir Edward Owen, Sir Harry Neale, Sir Charles Hamilton, Sir Ed. ward Foote, K.C.8., Fellowes, Sir Charles Ogle, Douglas, Lambert, Sir David Milne, Sir Thomas Hardy, Sir K. Stopford, Lord de Saumaurez, Sir T. Rodd. GENERALS—Sir John Slade, Sir Hudson Lowe, Sir Ed ward Kerrison, Sir Robert Wilson, Widdrington, Hon. Sir G. Anson, K.C.8., Sir F. Wetherall, Sir George Quentin, Wolff, Darling, Sir P. Maitland, Sir James Bathurst, Hardwicke, Sir Kenneth Douglas, Ramsay, Gardiner, Sir J. Macleod, Sir J. Smith, Lloyd, Sir Thomas Browne, Sir S. Hawker, O'Connell, Sir J. Cockburn, Montresor, Sir Lionel .Smith, Viscount Lor. ton, Ellice, Sir J. Nicolls, Sir T. Pritzler, Earl of Carnwath, Maxell, Sir Wm. Douglas, Sir James Lyon, Middlemore, Lord Harris, Sir George Walker, King, Sir J. Wm. Mu caster, Sir M. Disney, Salmon, May, Taylor, Sir Richard Jackson, Sir Wm. Pringle, Sir Thomas Reynell, Need, Sir J. Fuller, Lord Howden, J. Byng, Sir Charles Dalbiac, W. Hutcheson, Sir R. Donkin, Sir F. Bowden, Sir G. Alder, Sir William Grant Kerr. COLONELS—Horace Seymour, Paten, Lord Brudenell, By, Stawell, Ferguson, Considiner, Leith Hay, M.P., Mac kinnon, Bunbury, Tremenheere, Elphinstone, Fox, Cleveland, O'Reilly, Sir R. Armstrong, Itowan, Samuel Dales, Rice Trevor, H. Montagu, Bull, Madox, Wemyss, Caldwell, Co nolly, M.P., Lambert, Storey, Limond, Taylor, Sir Leonard Grenville, Bentinck, Lygon, St. Clair, Daubeney, Keane, J. B. Savage, Frederick, Walker, Fleming, Maberly, Falconar, Sir John May, K.C.8., Teesdale, Hanmer, Martin, Sir F. Smith, Charles Macleod, Lisle, Sir T. Eustace, Walker, Jones, Curry, Wynyard, Brodie, Sir George Hoste. MAJORS.—Derinzy, Allen, Macdonald, M. F. Forster, Tinling, Sweetman, Harriott, Freer, Arnaud, Wright, Treve lyan, Bailie, Johnstone, Waller, Handley, Tonkin, Kemyss Tynte, Call, Arthur, Hyde. CAPTAINS—W. L. Breton, Woolmore, Henry Nelson, John Locke, Alexander Wynton, S. B. St. John, Roe, M.P., Ferguson, R.N., Rutherford, Oram, Laws, Tinnie, Sir J. B. Pechel, R.N., Bowles, R.N., H. R. Brandreth, Maher, Foley, R.N., Sutton, Richard Thomas, R.N., Elsey, Sir James Gordon, Basil Hall, R.N., E. Curzon, R.N., Sir C. Schomberg, R.N., Pitman, W. Percey, RN., Thomas Dickenson, R.N., B. Big_ land, R.N., Isaac Robinson, Stirling, Richard Spencer, R.N. J. Lihon, R.N., Armstrong, Maxwell, Newell, Lnglish, Thos. White, R.N.,K. A. Scott, Tyler, KN., Gage Paterson, C.R. Scott, Tathwell, A. Macbean, Cooke Yarbourgh, Shireff, R.N., Piper, Kelly, Miles Stapleton, Weinyss, KN., Wathen, E. Sparshott, R.N., Joshua Smith, Baynes, R.N., Rose, Morris, W. Symonds, R.N., Sir R. Gradt, R.N., Hickey, R.N., F. Paget, Yorke, R.N., Marryat, R.N., F. G. Bond, R.N. COMMANDERS—WheatIey, Hervey, Hay, C. Haultain, Parker, Dobson, Barrow, W. Turner, Milne, George Norton, Tomkins. LIEUTENANTS—Beaver, J. Bull, Fawkes, J. Patten, J. H. Fearon, Fordyce, J. J. Rawstorne, Savage, R. P. Alcock, W. Wood, M'Namara, W. H. Beresford, H. Bremen, S. M. Macdonald, Stewart, W. S. Collins, R.N., G. Buchanan, George Lewis, A. P. Le Neve, E. Barnett, R.N. ENSIGNS--Wright, Robertson, Cox. The Marquis of Landsdowne presented an Address to his Majesty from the inhabitants of Swansea, praying protection for the lives and properties of Missionaries in the West Indies. Viscount Althorp presented an Address from Pontefract on negro slavery. Captain W. L. Brereton, unattached, presented a petitioa. The following were presented to his Majesty : The Duke of Cleveland, on his-elevation to a Dukedom, by Earl Grey. Earl Cadogan; upon coming to his -title. Admiral Sir G. Martin, on his appointment ofßear-Admiral. Sir P. Laurie, Lord Mayor, by Lord Melbourne. Sir R. -Fitz Wygram, Bart., on changing his name. Mr. Barrett, Speaker of the Assembly of. Jamaica, by Mr. Burge. Mr. Kennedy, to kiss hands, on being appointed one of the Lords Commissioners of his Majesty's Treasury, by I.ord Althorp. Mr. Beams, on being appointed one of his Majesty's Counsel. Lord Grey, of Groby, by Earl Grey. Mr. Sheriff Humphery, by Viscount Melbourne. Mr. B. C. Brodie, on being appointed Sergeant-Surgeon to his Majesty, by Sir Astley Cooper, Bart. Mr. W. O'Reilly, MY., by the Earl of Fingall. Mr. Keate, on appointment as Surgeon to his Majesty. Mr. Sheriff Peek, by Viscount Melbourne. Mr- Laurie, by Sir Peter Laurie. Captain H. Nelson, by Captain Woolmore. Lieut.-Gen. the Hon. Sir G. Anson, K.C.8., by the Earl of Lichfield. The Hon. H. Arundell, on coming of age, by Lord Byron. Mr. Under-Sheriff Stammers, by Viscount Melbourne. Mr. Under-Sheriff Pilcher, by Viscount Melbourne. Mr. W. 0. Carr, by Lord Goderich. The Earl of Mountnorris, by Sir J. Whatley, K.C.H. Captain J. Locke, by Captain Woolmore. Mr. Swanston, on his appointment as one of his Majesty's Counsel, by the Lord Chancellor. Captain Tyler, R.N., on being appointed Lieutenant-Governor of St. Vincent's, by Viscount Goderich. Lord Colchester, on return from foreign service, by Lord Sid. mouth. Sir Walter Scott, by the Earl of Selkirk. Mr. Aldis, by the Marquis of Salisbury. Lord Western, on his creation as a Peer, by Earl Grey. Captain A. Weynton, Elder Brother, by Captain Woolmore. Rev. T. S. M. Anderson, on being appointed Chaplain in Ordi. nary to her Majesty at Brighton, by the Earl of Denbigh. Captain Sir C. Schomberg, R.N., .on his appointment as Lieu. tenant-Governor of Dominica, by Viscount Goderich. Sir R. Keane, on coming to his title, by Sir T. Williams. Ensign and Lieut. Cox, on his appointment, by his father. Lieut.-Colonel Taylor, on his appointment as Groom of the Bedchamber to his Majesty. Commander Wheatley, on promotion. Sir Richard Acton, by Sir W. W. Wynn. Major-Gen. Middlemore, on his appointment, by Viscount Goderich. Rev. J. Marshall, by Rear-Admiral the Hon. G. Dundas. Dr. Clark, on his having received the honour of the Third Class of the Royal Hanoverian Guelphic Order, by Sir H. Taylor. Rev. Thomas Henry, Causton, bythe Lord Mayor. Sir C. Douglas, on his marriage, by Viscount Goderich. Mr. Whitshed, attached to his Majesty's Legation at Rio de Janeiro, on his appointment, by the Lord in Waiting. Rcv. Chas. E. Birch, M.A., by the Lord Bishop of Chichester. Mr. Chatfield, on his return from Warsaw, by Lord Palmerston. Sir Joseph Rudsdell, on having been appointed a Knight Com. mander of the Most Distinguished Order of St. Michael and St. George, by Viscount Goderich. Mr. H. Ellis, Principal Librarian of the British Museum, upon being appointed a Civil Companion of the Royal Guelphic Order, I y Lord Melbourne. Viscount Exmouth, to kiss hands, on coming to his title. Mr. H. C. Cooper, Dep.-Lieut. of Essex, by Lord Western. Mr. C. Scott, by Lord Selkirk. Mr. S. Briggs, of Alexandria, by the Earl of Munster. Hon. F. Villiers, Coldstream Guards, by the Earl of Jersey. Mr. Fitzgerald, M.P., on his appointment of Deputy Lieute nant of the county of Louth, by the Earl of Fingall. Mr. Nicholas Carlisle on being appointed a Knight of the Royal Hanoverian Guelphic Order, by Baron d'Ompteda. Mr. L. T. Flood, on his appointment as a Deputy Lieutenant for Middlesex, by Admiral Page. Mr. B. Constable, on his return from Greece, by Lord Napier. Mr. Merewether, by the Lord Chancellor. Admiral Sir T. Williams, Commander.in.Chief, Portsmouth. Mr. Edward Ricketts, by Viscount St, Vincent. Sir J. South, by Lord Napier. Mr. Richard W. Fitzpatrick, on his appointment to the Ore. nadier Guards, by Lord Holland. Mr. F. A. Grant, by the Bishop of Rochester. Mr. Vandiest, on his appointment as Gentleman of his Majesty's Privy. Chamber, by the Duke of Devonshire. Mr. AndreWs, on his being appointed Surgeon to the Hanove rian Embassy, by Baron d'Ompteda. Mr. Tarlet on, on iis'ivering the insignia of a G.C:B. worn by his uncle, the late General Sir B. Tarleton, by Lord Hill. Governor Stirling, on his arrival from Western Australia. Mr. Maxwell, by the Earl of Selkirk. Lieut.-Colonel Fox, on his appointment of Surveyor-General to the Ordnance, by Sir J. Kempt. Mr. Halford, M.P., by Sir Henry Halford. Mr. Joseph Thackerst, by Mr. William Brougham. Sir J B. Pechell, on appointment, K.C.H. Major-General Sir Lionel Smith, on appointment to the Go vernorship of Barbadoes, by Lord Goderich. Rev. Rowland Curtois, Chaplain to the Forces, on appointment. Lieut.. Colonel Lisle, on his appointment at Companion of the Bath, by Lieut.-General Widdrington. Lieut.-Colonel Hanmer, on receiving the Royal Hanoverian Guelphic Order, by Lord Hill. Lieut. W. J. Collins, R.N., by Sir J. Graham Lieut. E. Barnett, R N., by Sir T. Hardy, Captain English, by Major-General Pilkington Captain Newall, by Sir John Malcolm. Captain Maxwell, by the Earl of Rosslyn. Captain Armstrong, by Lieut.-Col. Fox. Commander Dobson, on promotion, by Sir J. Graham. Commander Parker, on his return from abroad, by Sir J. Graham. Commander Charles Haultain, on being nominated a Knight of the Guelphic Order, by Baron d'Ompteda. Lieut. George Lewis, by Sir J. Kempt. Captain Richard Spencer, R.N., on being nominated a Knight Commando,: of the Royal Guelphic Order, by Sir E. Tucker. Lieut. 0. Buchanan, on promotion, by Lieut.-Gen. Sir J. Smith. Commander Hervey, on his return from Palestine, Syria, &e.i by Lord De Saumarez. Commander Hay, on his promotion, by Sir J. Graham, Lieut. J. Bull, by his father, Lieut.-Colonel Bull. Commander W. Turner, by Sir J. Graham, Lieut. Fordyce, by Sir J. Buchan. Lieut. Maenamara, by General Grant. Lieut. W. Wood, by Sir J. Cockburn. Lieut. W. Beresford, by Viscount Beresiord. Lieut. H. Bremer, by Colonel Savage. Lieut. F. Patten, by Sir J. Graham. Lieut. J. Fearon, by Viscount Goderich. Ensign Robertson, by Sir J. Grigor. Colonel J. B. Savage, by Lord De Saumarez. Lieut. Beaver, by Admiral Brenton. Lieut. Stuart, on his return from the East Indies, by Sir T. Hardy. I.ieut.-Colonel Keane, by Lord Hill. Lieut.-Colonel St. Clair, by Sir 11. Taylor. Major Trevelyan, by Sir H. Taylor. Major Arnaud, on receiving the Insignia of the Third Class of the Royal Hanoverian Guelphic Order. Major Freer, by Lord F. Somerset. Major Harriott, by Sir R. Jackson. Major Sweetman, by Lord Hill. Lieut.-Col. Bunbury, on his return from Gibraltar, by Lord Hill. Major Tinling, by the Bishop of Bath and Wells. Lieut.-Col. Cleveland, on his appointment to the Royal Horse Artillery. Major Derinzy, by Lord F. Fitzelarence. Lieut.. Col. Bull, on receiving the Third Class of the Royal Ha noverian Guelphic Order, by the Master-General of the Ord. nonce. Lieut.-Col. H. Montague, by Cot Keath. Major Allen, by Capt. Pechell. Major-General Sir F. W. Mulcaster, on his promotion to be Colonel. Commandant. Lieut.-Col. Wemyss, by Lord Hill. Major Macdonald, by the Duke of Manchester. Major. General Lord Harris, by Lbrd Hill. Lieut.-General Sir James Lyon, by Lord Hill. Lieut.-Col. Madox, by Lord Hill. General Viscount Lorton, on his return from Ireland. Captain C. R. Scott, by General Sir S. Hawker. Captain Paterson, by General Sir W. Paterson. Colonel Edward Walker, by Sir H. Taylni. Captain R. A. Scott, by Sir James Kempt, Colonel Teesdale, by the Duke of Richmond. Captain T. White, by Sir T. Hardy. Captain Gage, by General Sir Edward Kerrison. Lieut.-Col. Samuel Dales, on being appointed Knight of the Royal Hanoverian Guelphic Order, by Lieut.-Gen. Hodgson. General Hay, by the Earl of Erroll. Lieut.-Col. Considine, on being appointed Knight of the Royal Hanoverian Guelphic Order, by Lord F. Somerset. Lieut.-Col. Moberly, by Sir James Kempt. Colonel Sir J. May, by Sir J. Kernpt. Lieut.-Gen. Sir W. Grant, by Lord Hill. Major-Gen. O'Connell, by Lord Harris. Lieut -Col. Fleming, on his return from Canada, by General Lord Hill. Captain Nelley,by Lord F. Somerset. Lieut.-General Sir T. Browne, on being appointed Equerry to the Duke of Sussex. Major_General Ramsay, on promotion, by Sir J. Kempt. Major_General Sir James Bathurst, on his appointment to the Government of Berwick Castle, by Lord Hill. Lieutenant Fawkes, on promotion and return from the lonian Islands. Capt. T. Dickinson, R. N., on promotion, by Sir James Graham. Major W. J. Forbes, on his appointment, by Lord Hill. Captain Roe, M. P., by Major Tyrrell. Capt. Rutherford, on his return, by Lord Fitzroy Somerset. Captain Tinnie, on promotion, by Sir G. Scorch. Capt. Levison, on his return, by Lieut. Gen. Sir J. Hamilton. Lieut. J. Murray Macdonald, by the Adjutant-General. Captain Elley, on his return, by Major-Gen, Sir W. Mac Lean. Captain Shirreff, by Viscount Goderich. Captain J. Likow, on promotion, by Lord De Saumarez. Captain Miles Stapleton, by the Earl of Abingdon. Commander Barrow, on promotion, by Sir James Graham. Captain A. Macbean, on promotion, by the Master-General of Ordnance. Captain Piper, on his return, by Major-General Pilkington. Captain E. Yarborough, by Lieut.-General Disney. Captain Foley, R.N., on 1)15 promotion, by Sir Thomas Hardy, Lieut.. General Sir J. Wetherall; on being appointed a Military Knight Grand Cross of the Guelphic Order. Lieut.. Gen. Widdringion, on being appointed a Knight Com mander of the Guelphic Order, by the Baron d'Ompteda. Captain Tatherell, by Lord F. Somerset. Captain Laws, on his promotion, by Sir James Graham. Captain Pitman, by Lord F. Somerset. Lieut-. Col, Leith Hay, M.P., by the Duke of Richmond. Colonel Brodie, M: P., by Sir G. 'Staunton. Rear-Admiral Sir E. Owen, on return-from the East Indies. Rear. Admiral Sir E. King, on being appointed a Military Knight Commander of the Guelphic Order, by Baron d'Ompteda. The Earl of Uxbridge, on his elevation to the Peerage. Lieut.-Col. By, on his return from the Rideau Canal, Canada, by Lieut.. General Sir James Kempt, G.C.B. Lieut.-General Sir John Smith, by Sir James Kempt. Ensign Wright, on his appointment, by Major Wright. FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZETTE WHITEHALL, FEB. 1 1, 1833. The Lord Chancellor has appointed Henry Greene, of Higham Ferrers, in the county of Northampton, Gent., to be a Master Extraordinary in the High Court of Chancery. WAR-OFFICE, FEB. 22, Ist or Grenadier Regiment of , Foot Guards—Ensign and Lieut. Hon. R. Bruce to be Lieutenant and Captain, by purchase, vice Dunlop, who retires ; Hon. G. Cadogan to be Ensign and Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Bruce, Feb. 22. Sth Regiment of Foot—Captain J. Laing, from half-pay, to he Captain, vice T. H. Davis, who exchanges, receiving the diffe. rence, Feb. 22. 24th Foot—Lieut. E. S. James, from the 69th Regiment, to be Lieutenant, vice Griffiths, whose appointment has not taken place, Feb. 22. 35th Foot—Capt. .1. R. Heyland, from the half-pay, to he Captain, vice B. Kerr, who exchanges, receiving the difference, Feb. 22. 38th Foot—Ensign W. Martin, to be Lieutenant, without purchase, vice Close, whose promotion has not taken place, Feb. 15. 39th Foot—Second Lieut. C. Van Straubcnzee, from the Ceylon Regiment, to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Hon. J. Sinclair, who retires, Feb. 22. 45th Foot—Ensign C. B. Roche to be Lieutenant, without purchase, vice M'lntire, promoted; Ensign J. Leslie, from the Ist West India Regiment, to be Ensign, vice Roche, Feb. 22 49th Foot—Lieut. W. S. Norton, from the half-pay of the 19th Regiment, to be Lieutenant, vice Dutton, appointed to the 60th Regiment, Feb. 22. 53d Foot—Erisign J. Scott to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Wigley, who retires; E. C. Moore, Gent., to be Ensign, by pur chase, vice Scott, Feb 22. 56th Foot—Lieut. J. White, from the half-pay of the 88th Regiment, to be Lieutenant, vice Russell, whose appointment has not taken place, Feb. 22. 69th Foot—Lieut. C. Dutton, from the half-pay of the 49th Regiment, to be Lieutenant, vice James, appointed to the 24th Regiment, Feb. 22. Fooi—Ensign E. E. Langford to be Lieutenant, by pur chase, vice Skene, who retires ; T. Douglas, Gent., to be En sign, by purchase, vice Langford, Feb. 22. 78th Foot—Capt. T. B. Wall, from the half-pay, to be Cap. tain, vice M. Macgregor, who exchanges, receiving the diffe rence, Feb, 22. 87th Foot—Lieutenant C. F. Parkinson to be Captain, by pun. chase, vice Graves, who retires ; Second Lieutenant W. R. Preston, to be First Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Parkinson; William Percy, Lea, Gent , to be Second Lieutenant, by pur chase, vice Preston, Feb. 22. Ist West India Regiment—Ensign W. Reamsbottom, from the half-pay of the 58th Fegiment, to be Ensign, vice Lesl.e, ap pointed to the 45th Regiment, Feb. 22. Ceylon Regiment—W. T. Layard, Gent., to be Second Lieu tenant, by purchase, vice V. Straubenzec, promoted in the 3,th Regiment, Feb 22. HOSPITAL STAFF.—Dr. Francis A. Macann, from the half-pay, to be Surgeon to the Forces, vice J. Baird, who retires upon halfpay. MEMORANDA.—The Christian names of Cornet Sutton, of the 7th Light Dragoons, are Henry John, and not John Henry. The appointment of Mr. Bace to the Ensigncy in the 38th Re giment should he vice Martin, promoted, and not vice Close, promoted. Commissions by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Oxford. The Right Hor. Charles Henry Viscount Dillon; and Charles Viscount Dungarvon, to be Deputy Lieutenants. Commission be the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Kent. East Kent Regiment of Militia. E. G. L. Permit, Gent., to be Ensign, vice Toler, resigned. DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY. GEORGE GARLAND, innkeeper, Petworth, Sussex. BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED. MYER MYERS. pawnbroker. Birmingham. JOHN WRIGHT, silk-mercer, Liverpool. BANKRUPTS. GEORGE RICH, tailor, Curz .n-street, May-fair, Middlesex, March 5, and April 5, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Burgess and Grant, Curzon-street, May-fair. WILLIAM ARTHUR CLA RK, wine -Merchant, Bishops gate—street, March I, and April 5, at two, at the Court of Bank. ruptcy. Newman, Guildhall- builbngs EDWAR i PIE itCY, carver and gilder, Tichbourue-street, Golden-square; March 5, at twelve, and. April 5, at two, at the Court of trankruptcy. Young; Poland-Street, Oxford-street. SAMUEL SANDERS, coach-builder, Totness, Devon Shire, March 9, at twelve, at the Seven Stars Inn, Totness, and April 9, at twelve, at the Clifford Arms Inn, Cbudlcigh. Fairbank, Staple Inn, London ; Michelmore, Totness. THOMAS JAMES, letter of horses, Keynshma, Somerset shire, March 15, and April 5, at one, at the Rummer Tavern, Bristol. Tomes, Lincoln's inn.fiekis ; Okey, Bath. J HN ED W A RDS WINGFIELD, tavern-keeper, Ponty Pool, Monmouthshire, Mai ch 4, and April 5, at twelve, at the office of Mr. Geach, Ponty Pool. Bourdillon, Great Winchester street, London ; Geach, Pont}} Pool. W I LLI AM NEWBOLD, leather-seller, Birmingham, March 9; at one, and April 5, at three, at the Globe Tavern, Temple street, Birmingham. Bigg, Southampton-buildings, London; Haywood, Birmingham. JOHN EVANS, baker, Hayerfordwest, March 5, and April 5, at eleven, at the Castle Inn, HaVerfordwest. Rees, Haverford west ; Hilliard and Hastings, Gray's Inn, London. JOHN AI ULLEY SI MSON, cattle-jobber, Frating, Essex, March 11, IS, and April 5, at eleven, at the Three Cups Inn, Colchester. Snarling, Colchester; Stevens, Wood,. Wilkinson, and Satchel', Little St. Tho Mas APOStle, London. THO IAS RUTLAND, coach-maker, Nottingham, March 6, and April 5, at one, at Dee's Royal Hotel,. Temple-row, Bir mingham. Harrison, Edmund-street, Birmingham; Norton and Chaplin, Gray's Inn-square, London. GEORGE MAY, bookseller,. Evesham, Worcestershire, March IS, and April 5, at eleven, at the offices of Messrs. Workman, Evesham. Botisfield, Chatham-place, Blackfrtars, London ; Workman, Evesham. DIVIDENDS. D. Grant, builder, Torquay,.Devonshire, March 13, at ten, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Hodgkinson, rope-manufacturer, Liverpool, March 16, at ten, at the Court of Bankruptcy—T. Stracy and Co., silkmen, Princes-street, March 15, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy —J. Taylor, clothier, Greave, Yorkshire, March 21, at ten, at the Pack Horse Inn, fluddersileld—J. and B. Knight, cotton-spinners, Great Horton, Yorkshire, March 16, at nine, at the Star Inn, Manchester—J. Harrison. cotton-spin ner, Manchester, March 15, at two, at the Palace Inn, Man chester—T. Emery, corn-merchant, Newport, Monmouthshire, March 15, at one, at the office of Messrs. Carry and Cross, Bristol—W. Miller, grocer, Walcot, Somersetshire, March Its At twelve, at the Three Cups Inn, Bath—W. Sedgwick, linen merchant, Manchester, April 3, at ten, at the Palace Inn, Man. chester--T. Kirby, King's Lynn, Norfolk, April 15, at seven, at the Globe Inn, King's Lynn. CERTIFICATES.-31aacir 15. J. Barker, miller, 3fattersey-hill, Nottinghamshire—NV. Hare, draper, 31archmont-street, Brunswick-square—T. Spring, vic tualler, City.road—J. Vise, stationer, Crawford-street, Bryan ston-square—T. A. Dnlcken merchant, Edward-str ee t, Port man-square—C. Bray, coachinaker, Theobald's-road—R. w. Ronald, merchant, Liverpool—lt. Sands, sen., engraver, Brewer_ street, St. Pancras—E. Shute, wine -merchant, Bristol—C. Shearn, soap-manufacturer, I.yncombe and Widcombe, Somer. setshire--T. B. Loader, map-publisher, Hart-street, Bloomsbury —G. 3facfarren, bookseller, London-street, St. Pancras—C. Bull, tavern-keeper, Bath—J. B. Stanley, ship-chandler, King-street, Tower-hill. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. D. Gameson and J. Williams, gunmakers,Threadneedle street—N. Upcott and T. Brice, fume's, Cullompton, Devon shire—J. Boulton and J. Robinson, mercers, Hanley, Stafford shire—T. King and Co., merchants, Bristol—P. Duncan and. Co., shipowners, Arundel—S. and H. Michael, Glasgow—S. Mi chael and S. Hook, linen-drapers, Norwich—D. Scott and J, Priestley, brewers, Halifax, I orkshire—J. F. Holmes and M. Williamson, anchorsmiths, Liverpool—M. Dodgson and J. Stockdale, grocers, Wakefield, Yorkshire—A. Tweetlale and G. Hardman, wine -merchants, Rochdale, Lancashire—C. and J. Gardiner, wine -merchants, Philpot-lane, City—T. Ikin and Co., Leeds (as far as regards T. lkinn)—E. Rowlaod and T. Bromiley, timber-merchants, Manchester—W. Granger and K Starkey, bakers, Westbury-upon-Trim, Gloucestershire—J. Leigh and Co., silk-printers, Brinkswav, near Stockport—J. Scholfield and Co., cotton.spinners, Satidieworth, Yorkshire—R. Barron and Co., chymists, Giltspur-street. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, FEB, 22. ESCHALEZ AND ANOTHER V. FRYER AND OTHERS. This was an actin(' to recover hack a sum of of 952/, paid by the plaintiffs for dried cod-fish shipped by the de fendants for Bilima, in Mirch, 1828. In January, 1628, the defendants, who are ship owners at Poole, had a vessel in that port laden with cod-fish, from Newfoundland, and they wrote to a Mr. Chesman, an agent of theirs in London, to sell the whole, or part, of tt e cargo. In answer to the application, Mr. Chesntan informed them that some friends of his (who turned out to be the plaintiffs) would take two-thirds of the cargo, to consist of 2,100 quintals, at 13s. 6d. per quintal, warranted dry, and of merchantable quality, if they (the defendants) would ship the other third at their own risk, the whole to be consigned to Messrs Bayeux and Co., at Billioa. After some negotiation this was agreed to, and the cod fish having been transshipped from the Triumvirate to the Elizabeth, at Poole, the latter vessel sailed for 13illioa towards the end of March, and arrived there on th e 7th of April. On the 13th of that month, Messrs. Bayeux and Ct., to whom the plaintiffs bed con signed their two-thirds of the cargo, informed them that the fish was found to be so bad on its arrival that it was unsaleable, and they therefore repudiated all share in the adventure. The p!aintiffs had previously accepted a bill for 9321 , which had been drawn upon them by the defendants for their two-thirds, which bad been paid. In consequenc e of the loss which was sustained b ) the bad quality of the fish, the pl rintiffs bad been considerable losers by the transaction, and they filed a bill in Chancery against the defendants, treating it as a partnership adven ture The present action was brought by direction of the Court of Coaocerv, to usert tain whether there had been, in fact, a breach of contract, and the quetsion of law as to its being a joint or partnership adventure w to he considered, but nut to be male a ground of nonsuit. After some deliberation, the Jury f mid for the ‘:efend ants ; and, in answer to a question by the Chief Justice, able quality. thought ti e fish was dry, and of merchant they raid T.., they thought Junon said, that as to the question of partnership, althouen the parties were jointly interested la the adventure in question, in his opinion it old not constitute such a partnership as to prevent their maintain ing au action for breach of contract. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FEB, 22. SIIIITTLItWORTH NICHOLSON. In this case, which was not concluded yesterday when we went to press, the Jury returned a verdict for de plaintiff Damages 1601. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, FEB. 2?. MR. OSBALDESTON'S GREAT MATCH AT NEWMARKET.-- WILSON V.GII.BEY. This was an action brought to recover the amount o' a bill of exchange for 801., given by the defendant as a con. sideration for mone y l en t hi m , t o satisfy a debt of h onour which he lost on M r . O s b a ld es l on!s rare at Newmarket. The hand-writing of the b., the bil) as se. 0 reptor being proved, . . Josh Hudson, of pu2il;st;,.. notoriety, stat, d that at the time of Mr. OshaWeston's great match;he was employed, as a mutual friend, to regulate the conditions of a bet be tween Mr. Harry England and the defendant, which they were going to stake upon the match ; as also another bet between the defend-tat and a Mr. Monday. The former bet was 301. by England to the defendant's 201., and the tatter, 141. 10s. to. SI. against- the success of Mr. 091)11- -lE4ton, The defendant lost both bets;, and the money nut being then convenient, lie requested Josh Hudson to redeem his honour by paying the bets for him, which Josh did. 'The defendant being in want 0! some small change, was accommodated by Hudson with two sovereigns, and, to close accounts, he gave Josh his acceptance for 30/,, which was immediately transferred to Hudson's landlord. On its arriving at maturity the de fendant refused to honour his acceptance, upon the ground that the bill was given in liquidation of a gambling debt In consequence of which the present action was brought. Josh admitted that in the event of the plaintiff not obtain ing a verdict he would be held liable. Mr. DovvuNo, for the defendant, contended that the consideration for which the bill was given was illegal, and therefore the plaintiff ought to be nonsuited. The Jury found a verdict for the amount claimed, 301. and interest. SPIRIT OF TFIE PUBLIC JOURNALS. The Globe of list night seems inclined to de 'end the establishment of military Courts under :he Irish " Disturbance Suppression Bill," and ar gues against our view of the apparent impolicy of that particular provision. The Globe has fallen into a manifest error in its construction of some of our re marks upon the subject. It represents us to have suggeted two descriptionsof tribunals in place of the courtmartial—namely, Ist, a Court composed of three or five barristers, to act both as Judges and Jurors ! 2d, to summon special Juries from the higher class of gentry. Although the difference 'nay not be in the highest degree important, it is fair to say that our proposition was, either for a Court composed of barristers only, or, if the decision upon both law and fact should be considered a trust too delicate and complex for lawyers (albeit, subaltern officers of two-and-twenty years of age are deemed quite capable of discharging it), they (the lawyers) should be assisted by a Special Jury. We did not recommend that the barristers and Special Jurors should be separately resorted to, but should, if neces sary, constitute Judge and Jury of one and the same Court. We may nowobserve,however, that if a Special Jury were summoned, the Court might be composed of a King's sergeant,or King's counsel, and two assis tant barristers. If the jury were to be altogether dispensed with, the number of barristers on the bench ought to be five, with a sergeant, or silk gown, for their leader. As for intimidation acting upon the minds of such men, we look upon the idea to be chimerical. Would the duty of hearing and deciding charges under this Act,be likely to 'render the mem bers of such a CoUrt more obnoxious than an At torney or SolicitOr-General becomes by that of pro srcining offences to conviction ? Again, if special Juries were summoned, it is. said, that if not open to intimidation from their rank and character, they are at least habitually so inflamed against the pea santry, and so actuated by the Orange spirit, that . - no just verdicts could be expected from them. But if that be the case-s-;•Good Heaven !—why are gentlemen of that kidney tolerated in the .Commis sion of the Peace as Mag6trates? Why, as Magis trates, are they empowered to carry into execu tion the most hazardous clauses of the Act against the peasantry? Why are the warrants, or the personal presence of such fierce partisans, to he the authority on which officers of the army and the police force have been commaNded by the Bill to ransack private houses, to their inmost recesses, for arms (never so concealed), arid for persons who, if found, must be innocent at least of the crime of absence, or if not found, must be maniacs to pretend that they are absent when they are really at home ? The exercise or authorization of such really odionS encroachments on domestic privacy is not, it appears, to he withdrawn from the List] squires on account of any risk which they may incur through it ; yet we are told that their honest discharge of the duties of special jurymen on oath is not to be expected from them, because of its endan gering their lives ! With regard to military men, it is assuredly from no wish to depreciate the honour, integrity, or sound (though too often uninstructed) sense of that respectable and not unpopular class of our fellow-subjects, that we have laboured to release them from the irksome responsibility, and Ireland from the fearful consequences, of their assumption of the judicial office. Our evening contemporary states, that under the Bill they would substantially be judges of the fact only, but that the law of the case would be dictated to them by the Judge-Advo cate. We believe, however, that the business of a Judge-Advocate is more to advise a courtmartial when required as to the especial points, such as the reception of certain evidence, and so forth, than to ven ture an intimation of what verdict ought to be passed. He is more the minister and servant of the court than its master, the members being themselves an swerable for whatever part of their proceedings may clash with his opinion, when regularly called for ate; officially given; and with all respect for the army generally, we must say that our experience of mili tary men has not inspired us with any extraordinary disposition to see, in the half-educated mind of a soldier, a fit authority to control the judgment of a well-instructed lawyer. But see, as we have already represented, what is the condition of these military officers. They and their men are first engaged in a series of measures auxiliary to the police, and executory of the will of the magistrates —namely, breaking open houses, hunting down disturbers of the peace, dispersing or crushing assemblies set on foot for promoting the avowed or secret ends of agitation ; and after having done all this,—after having been identified in the minds of the multitude with theii local enemies,—after having turned the friendly sentiment with which the King's troops have heretofore been regarded by the people into those of bitterness and exasperation, arid received such proofs of that unfortunate change of the popular feel ing as must infallibly re-act upon the temper of the army itself, officers no less than soldiers,—then, at the rail of all, these very officers, so hated, and too proba bly so hating, are appointed to sit in judgment on the excited and offending wretches with whom they have been placed by the Legislature of the country in a ,tate of open war. Is tins fair to the officer himself, to the parties tried, or to the administration of justice? It is really monstrous. For the sake of the army and the p. ople, and of that remnant of public peace which may yet he saved by the sedulous for bearance of the former from all needless harshness or inter meddling with the niultttutle, we would earnestly beseech his Majes.y's Ministi.rs to revise that por tion of the Act now in qua tion which prescribes the tx.ili ary constitution of the Courts to be treated under it. Assuredly this our supplication is offered in no disrespectful or unfriendly spirit to Minister-. At the present joncture, and assailed as is the coun try by ttie corrupt or disol oozing proj, cts of ex treme factions, it would be 111 our eyes a grievous and cruel calamity if the resolution of Ministers de clared last night by Mr. Stanley were to be real zed, mid if the Reform Cabinet were, by the rejection either of its cue, cive or remedial measures, com pelled to throw up the gaverritnent. We should deprecate such tt calamity as, eartieatly as the most ardent friends of the Government, but we will not compromise a principle. Our fervent hope is, that the present Ministry will maintain (dice; but our l'xst wlsh is, that the caus e o f lib erty an d j ust i ce may not setter.—Tisane. - When we "see the Conservatives, in or outside the House of Commons, extremely industrious and gi e garious in opposing any particular proposition of Reform, we may be confident that the object is to fortify some point d'oppui of importance to thir political power. This natural purpose is remarkaltly illustrated in, the present abortive attempts of the Conservative journals and the Tory opposition, to foritty the_ municipal corporations against the siege now inprogress to re d uce tho se nasty , c orru p t, an d self-elected Juntas. No language is sufficiently strong to stigmatise these abominable local nuisance , . T inlid h me e ceoad ß risp eform Act s amen di ng t h e representat i on, ex tracted th e tus k s o f t h e po li t i cal b easts, hut the wild a uld bo a re r a e t de n e aofftu functionaries o e pi x uni t b e ri r i ie n cs ! i n o a tpo t i e n d ipon . o : M ual i an n rd i s t ps e riigi t p r n s ne n iil o al ignorant of th e enm i ty of the great majority of es, if they did not take immediate and bold measures to rout the political adversaries who, occupying these strong holds of local power, keep up a sort of Vendean warfare against liberal and enlightened opinions. Lord Lyndhurst and Sir Robert Peel always .pro ,ected these favourite allies of Toryism. When the conduct of the corporation of Liecester; in the me morable instance of the wholesale manufactur e of 800 Honorary Freemen, notoriously merited and experienced public indignation, Sir Ro bert Peel threw his flimsy mantle of pro tection over the, dirty gowns of the Aldermen of that exquisitely foul and self-elected Corporation. When the right of municipal bodies to appropriate their funds to electioneering cabals was questioned and sought to be remedied, Lord Lyndhurst " laid down the law," that the public funds were private property. We do not marvel, therefore, that un scrupulous and Conservative confederates of such despicable bodies should exhibit strong hysterical symptoms at the approaching dissolution of their last remaining friends. Thus we see Lord Satition and Mr. Gladstone (excellent judges of the important co-operation of close corporations in Tory elections) vindicate the .corporation and freemen of Liverpool, and dramatically express their astonishment that any imputation should be cast on the integrity and purity of their immaculate constituents and coadjue tots. With the like affected astonishment, Mr. Matthias Attwood experiences an epileptic seizere when the Merchant Tailors' Company or the city municipal. Constitutions are attacked. Sympathy will account fur these morbid political feel rig.. We trust, however, that the Parliamentary Committee will courageously discharge their responsible duty, and anatomise these " bodies." If their powers should prove insufficient to the la bour of cleansing the Augean stable, the Hercules of an Act of Parliament must be summoned to their aid. The public require to know the constitution and property, the receipts and disbursements, of these public institutions and endowments. Such an investigation is essential to their purificition, and to the restoration and extension of their original objects. Bristol, Coventry, Stamford, Warwick, Liverpool, not forgetting London, will furnish ample materials for examination ; and the burgesses of every corpo rate city and town in England and Wales ought to petition tire House of Commons, stating their seve ral local corruptions, and get those petitions referred to the Parliamentary Committee. The doors of the Town-halls or " CourtAouses" must now be opened, and the question of Municipal Reform is of the very first importance to the local and national liberties of the people. Those snug little jurisdictions, de nominated Court Leete, are also municipal jurisdic tions, antiqUated: and useless, which require si milar. exposure and search -warrants. If the electors are not fit to be intrusted with the appoint ment of thir own municipal officers and magistracy, they can have no pretence to choose legislators, But the rout has commenced, and all self-elected bodies will be put hors de combat. They have; had their time, and enjoyed their monopoly ; they have attained an extraordinary longevity, and must now be gathered to their fattiers---the boronghmongers. Self-elected bodies were the illegitimate offspring of a corrupted representation ; with the fall of " No mination seats" they fall, and we should be sur prised if our contemporaries, the Standard and Morning Post, did riot attend their obsequies as chief mourners. Mr. Matthias Attwood's attempt to extricate the Merchant Tailors' Company from the anatomy of the Parliamentary Committee utterly failed. We do not think that he paid any high compliment to the self-respect of the Company by seeking to exclude inquiry. If an individual is accused of malpractices, he courts and (if innocent) demands inquiry. Affected indignation and contempt of public charges, will not now hold Corporations harmless, or remove the stains of accusation. We re commend the Corporator„ to meet their fate with a good grace; their glass has run out. They may console themselves in the reflection, that however great their nuisance, the abatement will amply and gratefully satisfy the public mind, and future reformation will atone for past offences. We repeat, however, that the exposition of corporate abuses must not be left. exclusively to corporate officers; the independent burgesses and citizens, uncontaminated by union with corporations, must immediately aid the Parlia mentary Committee by petitions representing the municipal constitutions and abuses of their respec tive communities. The Conservatives, by provoking debate, will greatly assist in the object of exposure, and we trust that they will give us their obliging assistance. It is curious to see Sir Robert Peel's altered position in the new House. He is a fallen star—a comet which has lost its tail. Even the Hon. Baronet, with all his " address" and solemn attitudes, cannot justify Corporations. His jesuit ical vindication of abuses, and his affected and mi nute Reforms are equally out of date. Sir Charles Wet herell's " Corporation robbery" no longer sounds the alarm-bell. Sir E4ward Sugden stands without the pale of the present Parliament. Sir Robert has no seconders. How are the mighty fallen " Tempora mutantur, et nos mutamur in illis."—Morning Chronicle. Sir Francis Burdett was certainly premature when Ire cougraiulated the House and the country at hav ing got rid of the fancies which disturbed the ima gination of Mr. O'Connell, end when he hailed the return of good humour and good feeling between that gentleman and the Government on the difficult subject of Irish affairs. It is true there was a calm, and the calm was accompanied by an interval of sunshine—the sunshine of Church Reform—imme diately upon the statement of the Noble Lord who propose I it. But the storm lied only intermitted ; it had not ceased; and now it comes on again, blowing with more violence than ever, at the very moment when we ought to be hailing the return of those " halcyon days," which, it' Sir Fiaticis Bur dett had been a prophet, instead of being an orator, would have dawned before now even upon Ireland. Truly Ministers are either very unfortunate or very in judicious in all their proceedings with respect to that unfortunate country. They seem to have a taste for blowing hot and cold with the same breath, and as nearly as possible at the same moment. Just before they brought in their Bill for collecting Vie arrears of tithe at the point of the bayonet, tney announced the extinction of all tithe, to the great joy, but to the still greater disappointment, as it was soon to prove, of those who, if they had the means, ha rn t the inclination to pay them. In the same manlier, just before they brought in their Bill for iniroducii.g, amongst other strong measures, trial by soldiery bat; Ireland, they announced their project of Church re fur m, which, whatever objections it mght be liable to on the score of spoliation, was certainly calcu al f ed :his instance, as in the former, the Pine I e t o x raise en sv thee changee p e expectations tt the s Churchof th o E se ,ta w b h i josh i m oo ei k fini,iti e g.c ti oeen c .. bon lowing hot back k t o a f ti t d he co c ld hu w ir Church e lutb b esieß e rr ni el d n i o u i mu t e exasperated aadeniodf-wyaba sort of rider to the good news, this Ire land b ) the old expedient of t u rning over the Con ,titutio„ to t h e guardhouse 0. tiMti:leOpaC,:tionte,lllainnosttehres e trail if tby this s h% Pr y ite oin a f d gt l e ai •I'l iig straight forward to ti.err pur pose. And it is no wonder that they should. j •