The Sun. — London, England, 1833-07-10 00:00:00

// L,(.1 ,d, .. „., ~ • . ~,,,,,,,, ~.. , • ,„,....„ --• .- ,- . l "e. . - / . :.:;:: .... :.: , -... y '''' 4..; ; ... ,-.7'-, ,:..,•, • 044,, , ,,, . -i [ .. .• -. ._ P• 0 ~%):44 ' . . ~ 1 , ' ' , N 1 \ ,\. . '; , '-'. 4:, ' •- • Ss .,. " '' . '4 ., • ,.1 ; tC4A ,-, •' t • i '''" ~ . — A V . ' *„.. • -, '4,c Y.--.'` ''C '-• =ti:%. ' k- , l ' i:) 'r ,, i'; \\ ... ±. ..-1% ., ,ti , Y ' ' ~ ., 3 1 P ' ,= -- t - 5 ' - -.' __ _ : - __ -‘ *3 - -„ 1 - -- -s, ' vali! -....- . , ' i ti - g 1 , 4, 2 119.",, Tg _o IN co _t_j_ll',• A,/$ EAST INDIA HOUSE, Jutv 9, 1833. THE COURT of DIRECTORS of the UNITED COMPANY of MERCHANTS of I NGLAND TRADING t o th e EAST INDIES , 10 hereby give Notice, That a GENERAL COURT of the said COMPANY I~u he held at their House in Leadenhall-street, on Tuxs 14r, the 23d inst., from Nine o'clock in the Morning Istil Six in the Evening, for the ELECTION of a DI IECTOR of the said COMPANY in the room of IEORGE SMITH, Esq., who bath di , qualified. PETER AUBER, Secretary. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. intenticn to introduce a reform into the municipal corp./a- MARKET INTELLIGENCE. ARCHES COURT. JULY 9. PRIVATE PUPIL. 4 CLERGYMAN, f or some years Tutor to a Nobleman, and subsequently re eiring Six Pupils into his gouge, a moderate distance ra in London, would be glad to fill a Vacancy with a )entleman's Son, whose Health or Education may require sor e than common attention. Letters addressed for the Rev. H. S., Mr. Rodwell's, ookseller, 46, New Bond-street, London, will be duly orwarded to him in the country. BR ITISH INSTITUTION, PALL-MALL. rHE GALLERY, w ith a SELECTION of PICTURES, from the WORKS of Sir 'OSHUA REYNOLDS, Mr. WEST, and Sir THOS. ,ANV REN CE, the Three last Presidents of the Royal Loden, Y , IS Open Daily, from Ten in the Morning till ix in the Evening. Admittance ls.—Catalogue Is. WILLIAM BARNARD, Keeper. "_THE QUARTERLY REVIEW, D , g • ,„„ No. XCVIII. E 2 6 WAS PUBLISHED THIS DAY. i i On Thursday next, by Colonel C. J. NAPIER, C. 8., COLONIES, 1 Islands Treati ng o f their Value generally—o f t h e l on i an / War ! LI Particular—th e i m po r tance of the latter—in Fi„ " l a Commerc e — as regar d s Russian Policy—their • -anrea--collv an expense to Great Britain—detailed P r apfs th at they ought not to be so—Tur ki sh Govern pt`-Battle of N4varin...-Ali Pacha—Sir Thoma tiaad---Strictures on the Administration of Sir Frede r said MAW more accomplished old woman never drank catlap," it who „ell, as he shut the door .. the last word has him s eak a pl a 'Y i d; and yet because he is a whilly.whaw body, atiel p has extd isible tongue of his own, and is well enough connected,. or TZ.P e e , a!IY because nobody could find out whether he is t Whig! it,.. Y, this is the third time they have made him Provos . vagauntlet. Provost."— nee thick vol Svo., with IS Plates., price I Ss. cloth boards, --- T ' and W. Boone, 29, New Bond-street. ASYLUM FOREIGN and DOMESTIC LIFE OFFICE, 70, CornLill, and 5, Waterloo-place, London. DIRECTORS. The ~ . Honourable WILLIAM FRASER, Ch a irman. ?•rotterrenel LUSHINGTON, C. 8., Deputy Chairman. _molds Es !Willie% Pratt ' q. C. W. Hallet, Esq. F iln 3llle 'F.. E4cl * I Capt. Geilt Ferrer, C.B. ranc r, __...q . Kernble, Esq. William Edmund s, Esq. Thomas Fenn, Esq. G. Farren, Esq., Resident Director. Sui t , ` . PHYSICIAN—Dr. Fergu el ° Ns—H. Mayo, Esq., F.R.S., an , TMallaway, Esq. LO W DOMESTIC INSURANCE. A est rates ever published, whether for a term Or for e w h ho;e of life. r.„_;;- e ----j.lowing are selected from the even rates:— pr I whole Life.' 7 Years. \ \ Age. IWhole Life. 7 Years. I g o 111 0 1017 I 40 211 1 110 8 "----________2 2 0 112 10 50 42 0 2I 7 ,One-thi r ALTERNATIVE I4 ' per cend of the Life premium may be left unpaid, to be !olucted from the sum a ssure d, on a sca l e equa l t o i n t eres t t. AS 6 ENDING 1 TCW V ~~i SCALE OF PREMIUM. Age.lSeven First Years. I sSevuecnceedyeainrgs. Every Year of Life after. 162 2 4 7 1 15 1 3 0 11 270 4 9 8 4 011 7 0 3 2 0 - SO 1 1 4 40 1 8 7 1 18 3 2 11 11 This scale ought to supersede all others in cases of An kity, or Leases for Lives, in which very low rates for so ) 0g a period as fourteen years will be found highly ad- Itatageous. VOYAGES AND FOREIGN RESIDENCES. Person s voyag i ng or res iding abroad, Mast ers , S u p er . ''goes, and others, insured for the whole of life or for a ' P r if ic voyage. PREG NANCY, INFIRM HEALTH, AND OLD AGE. females need not appear ; the rates f or di seases are Moderat e , and Policies are granted to persons of advanced ~ °su es may be effected without delay. F ROM THE LONDON GAZETTE. Zhe Xi ng h WHITEHALL, JULY theB33 t' i to the church been pleased to present Rev. David Buchan Lo c h„...,_ Hutch and parish of Drysdale, in the presbytery le vL2" . nlen and county of Dumfries, vacant by the death of -*" John Henderson. The WHITEHALL, JULY 2. co Chancellor has appointed Alfred Paget, of . Leicester, e count Courteic, Gent., to be a Master Extraordinary the High of Chancery. Ili M e Lord Chan HALL,TIVHITE ZZ Hankinsee a, o b r has rtse . j Ed TL . w r a 4 rd Hankins (and not _ ti eref ord, en ; . eforeadv i d) of Ledbury, in the county be blaster Extraordinary in the High ° rt of Chancery'? to a Cor r , . h"ssions by t Lord Lieutenat of the Count of N Pe r piT t P,°.! , . T. Dehe Grey, and the n Hon. E. V. Ha y rbord, orfolk. to be cornrisolenutb;zs ne Jur 10. d Lieutenant of the County of South ceNe Haines Jones, Esq a . m t i O be tnbeputy Lieutenant, June 12. (:', O „ D 7 ~...J.R.Gi),ECLARATIONS OF INSOLVENCY. nAMi t ..• ATKIN C ' •-•CL s ., MILLS, grocer, Newark g - - u y i a )o r n d - , Trent. b,s %Quit_ street l O CKTON, wine-cooper, Long-yard, JOH N BANKRUPTS. Mino t I- ', EVIL, auctioneer, Hanbyford-place, Kennington_ at t en, ~! .3orrey, to surrender July 19, at on , e, and . A 134,1 (4 th e Court of Bankruptcy. Smith, New Bridg u e g -street, TlloiAl G raham, Co thall-buildings. rdshir,.`B BRI DGWO P OD, cla •-merchant, Potteries, , Staf. nrin s ',',,, d uly 13, and August 20, ) at eleven, at the W oolesley street'Coolesley. alalf.paftt VV RIGHT johslzackfriars, Lornigon b‘tajnoktiruvpts.et;,nel.v.fe,arasod' Brid e,Staffordshire. Smith, New Bridge_ stationer, o C a l i t a ne e eleven,r y-1 at the ti tul July Court2f3, Whit_ ..." 40 , ~-J: Ph iPPs, AugustWea er's- - liall Basinghall-street ; chant, " ne,L. roN , otheial v assi nice: th e Iv Pre ston , -,. and RICHAr and BES, corn.mer /leet..P-hall,'P-at, neashire, July Aug.A 20, at eleven, at July W 4 L o _ F o ston. .Blake t l o o n ek - a p i r id es F to i n ddey, Sergeant's Inn, Jul y W 4 B(Hy r u o t t i c ; Pilking , Adlin t a" Au , coal-merchant, Preston, Lancashire, P r k g'°h, 0, g• 20, at eleven, at the Town-hall, Preston. a Th er, Presh e g ° rY, and Faulkner, Bedford-row, London ; A ~(111,k5.--.,,” Walker, Preston. i su gUst ' 2o - , -.I tOADHURST, builder, Stockport, July 24 and -- .„,rtiv a p:.., a , one, at the Palace Inn, Manchester. Gadsden, v . RA Nl,-"'Tn, London ; Coppock, Stockport. '"iQU I i 'l.' , NI ARRIOTT, jun., bone-merchant, Mapperle e y, Boy,v §"altishire, July '24, and Aug. '2O, at eleven, at the Bak 4.ondoh°ttinghan. Holme, Frampton, and Loftus, New Inn, -; Swann, Nottingham. j ' 8 nd DIVIDENDS. at 14- erson, victualler, Gerard's _C y a s n s itr ß ut e ,t r e k y s — hire, July 27, bo ti ,r• Past eleven, at the Court 3_l . F. Preston, H nover-square, July 30, at tel l aft St. George's-place, _ac curlewis, tailor, By er Str eet, at the Court fatten, nkruptcy— • of Baokrup cy— t E. M. tvorstreet, July 31, t at te tl w ieurt at ~rchier and S. Bonsor, :I hers, Oxford-strcet, Aug. 1, It 4 , 1 , at the Court of lia a nkruptcy—B. Breeds, lime-burner, n 4 stings, July 31, at ten, at the Court of Bankruptcy—W. T. r4fr y, miller Wolverton Mill, Buckiughamshire, July 31, at Z e iv:, - at the Court of Bankruptcy—S. Garbett,mcehalit, Bankruptcy—B.Bir.. '`rir'itham Aug. I, at eleven, at the Court of Il ho -° ,, ' ! 4 . flax-spinner, Leeds, Aug. 1, at eleven, at the Court_ 1,7,1 e. Leeds —S. S. Hargill, dyer, Newlay, d Yorkshire, Aug. Gre at We. Commercial-buildings, L W White, grocer, 1 ; 0 101 Brid ge , Staffordshire, Aug. s ee at eleven, at the Royal ford,ni lG ‘ Tr alngham—W. W. Lyon, Lre a wer, Barton Turn, Staf. Wat, c , re ' 40 g. 6, at twelve, at the George nn, Lichfield—J. of Mr n ' Me rchant Liverpool, Jub , 31, at twelve, at the Otli v c e e rivt hu . sf aines Liverpool—VV. Howells, shopkeeper z 1 - Messrs.°Pe' M ° ll /nouthshire, Aug. 2, at twelve, at the otheleartof var(inan rothero and Phillips, Newport—P. Valentmte' I I I I lanch e ' BurY. Lancashire, Aug I, at three, at the S ar nn, at R ad ster—R. Roberts, plumber, Birmingham, Aug. 1, at one, coach elihurst's New Royal Hotel, Birmingham—lt. Chure nn , oorninyietor, Liverpool, Aug. 7, at twelve, , at the Claret- at- "e, at thWerPool—D. Lodge, ironmonger, I oole, July 31, e London Tavern Inn, Poole. T. Pierce H C ERTIFICATES—JuLv 30. . anferdry Liverpool—J. !!;oP4ditt a ß . n ..l_, Grueber, oil manufacturers, . orse -4' Nneras, i r.lr iusnli ths, Worcester—T. Arber, builder , H ".011khouse, victualler, Bagnigge Wells,Tavern, W. Th o PAR TNERSHIPS DISSOLVED., Yorkshire ... 4. vv. ',,,,u. and M. Throup, millers. Lo LYes ,41,,glies and W. Gilbert, linen-d n a g iers, Gloucester—C. -g Chihos' general merchants , S. I urh arn. ',, and Co. ship-owners, Sunderland near the Sea, - Louis de de Potosi, Mexico— lire4r 84 ' 14 So':-,ltliviam. Npt.oPna'r(skoerfaarnd urgeons, Bar-street, All as Co.,' regards H.. 1. N. Parker)—A. Don and f ., J • ka7 4 .A. Lowin , schoolmistresses, Reading—C. , 110 - "'fa 11t4v,Me-Merchants, Berwick-upontlislVneLa.., i I West- Co.riecorinttc--It:t _laiMe-burners hankers,Plurgb xf (y or ar - 1 , Steele, d G. Thompson , and len-m ati ..- a r c inne rs L nd Co., J.EBroke and J. Hargrave o , ,, S , i s ID a O n l d - T. 1.) Bluareaurers, Kirkstall, Leeds, Yorkshire—C r and Co, rniiii4,rn. drapers, Stonehouse, Devonshire — H. `.alter Co.,NV a l ll r e i r_ d ay -street_ J.'irers, Clifton, Bristol—B. P. Witts, 1 ght , a wine-dcalers, trristol—G. inZ e sewright and J. I C h . e r I_ g 1 , e as se s- w fo n unders, Bordesley, e's Vin,ghaln---W. I r n a?lle N y V and u ß a . R. u Faulkner, portraitpainat fact We'stni"onester—R. Barrow and J. Barrow, grocers, Kendal, urer7.and,w. Higgins and J. Higgins, blank d Colinen-drapers, ttitrhanipninghamJ. Harper, sett, an . ,', bleach ( ....,,tar as regards A. Harper)—. Ainswor ,. . th and Co , ers "ea La h . R La b and T. KIP I m V!' teoli s /3 Py, Durham ire— . m IBen t_. arnard Castle, —J. H. Seabrook and G . , S.': nd (70,1inerchants, ltoc?tt-lane, Fenchulch-street—• Sayer) Colinen tnerchaiits,itistorers, Brighton—J. Metford and ~ A tailor, named WILD CANS, at Mayence Pa 4 n 6 tajust in vented a dress, cons i sting of cravat, waistcoat, loons, coat, and gaiters all in one piece, and not re luiring a minute to put on. LONDON MARKETS, (From the' London New Price Current" of yesterday.) SUGAR.—The demand for Muscovades last week was con. fined to small parcels for the immediate use of the trade ; they still decline to get into stock at the present prices. The estimated sales of last week were 2,500 hhds. and trs. ; there was no alteration in the currency. This afternoon the Sugar Market heavy. The sales this day amounted to 500 hhds. and trs. This day by public sale 120 casks Barbadoes Sugar, part taken in, 58s. 6d. a 585., being 6d. lower. Ti'. the early part of last -.veek there were extensive buyers of Crashed entitled to the bourq or double refined at 30s. per cwt., all parcels offering at that price were taken off, and the holders of the remainder asked 315., which stopped the demand, the latter is, however,now the nearest quotation ; Lumps and Loaves for the home trade have also been purchased more freely. MAURITIUS SUGAR.—The request for Mauritius Sugars last week became more limited, as the speculators appear to have suspended their operations for the present, no doubt on account of the quantity they have lately purchased; the pukes are about 6d. per cwt. lower. EAST INDIA SUGAR.—The only sales are small parcels at former prices, chiefly Slams. FOREIGN SUGAR.—At public sale on Friday 1,056 chests Havannah sold about Is. per cwt. higher than the previous rates by private contract, mid. white rather soft at 28s. a 28s. 6d. strong 295. 6d., strong yellow at 255. A cargo of Bahia afloat, 700 chests, has been sold for a Foreign market, white at 255., brown at 20s. Average price of Sugar U. 9s. 00. per cwt. _ _ COFFEE-Foreign and East India Coffees are 2s. a 3s. higher, British Plantation 4s. a ss. per cwt. higher. The sales of Foreign are about 2,500 bags, ord. Brazil sold Ms. a 555., good and fine ord. 565. a 585., colthvy 61s. alils. &1.. all taken in for export ; St. Domingo, 60s. ; Ceylon, good, ord. 595. a 595. 6d. ; and, subsequently, at 61s. 6d. and 625. ; ord Sumatra, 505.; good to fine ord. 565. a 585. ; Yellow Mysore, 70s. 6d. ; Mocha went off with spirit ; fair 695. 6d. a 775. About 1,000 packages have been sold ; triage Jamaica, 85s. 6d. a 87s. 6d. ; good ord. 90s. a 935. ; fine ord. 945. a 98s. At yesterday's public sale 50 bales Mocha Coffee brought 735. 6d. a 745. per cwt. This day, by public sale, 140 bales 12 cases 50 bags Mocha Coffee have been taken at 765. a 90s. 6d. for green ordinary mixed to good even ord. Yellow; 32 casks of good mid. Jamaica sold at 5/. 17s. a 5/. 17s. 6d. per cwt. ; and 925. a 945. 6d. for good ordinary rather higher. In Foreign Coffee no business of consequence. COCOA.—There have been sales of British Plantation Cocoa at rather high prices, mid.and fine 555. a 605. RUM, BRANDY, AND HOLLANDS.—The inquiries after Rum have been general and rather extensive; the hol ders refuse to sell; Leewards about 25.; Jamaica held at a proportionate advance. In Brandy or Geneva there is little alteration. TALLOW.-Tallow is firm at the late advance. COTTON-The Cotton Market is very firm ; the sales of last week were above 5,000 bags, chiefly Surats, very ord. to fine 5 %d. a 7 1 4 d. The accounts from the manufacturing dis tricts state that several of the extensive manufacturers threaten to close their mills sooner than submit to the high prices demanded for raw Cotton, which is now chiefly held by the speculators. This day, by public sale, 580 bales Surat s{d. a 61d. ; all sold, and prices fully supported. WOOL.-Sales 326 bags Australian ls. 6 %d. a ss. 4d. per lb. ; 462 bags Spanish 2s. 5 %d. a 2s. 6 %cl. ; Lamb Is. 10d. a 2s, Id.-Decidedly at improved prices, and the advance likely to be maintained. FRUIT.-The inquiries after Currants continue, but there are few sellers ; old Cephalonia 645. TEA.-The Market remains quiet ; the delivery continues good. The declaration for next Sale will be out to-morrow. SALTPETRE.-1,890 bags put up yesterday were taken in at 38s. 6d., 40s. required. TURPENTINE-A part of the last arrival of Rough has been sold at 125. 3d. per cwt., being of the new collection ; Ils. 6d. asked for the remainder, not being of the new collec tion. For Spirits of Turpentine the drawers have realized their prices to 41s. SPICES-There is little alteration in Pimento or Pepper : the former sells at 4 d. a 4 •y & d. for the mid, quality, the latter 3 %,,d. a3 3 A d for half heavy ; heavy Malabar, 4 %d. a 4•%c1. By public sale yesterday Cinnamon, on account of the Ceylon Government-first sort, 67 bales 6s. Cxl. and 9s. 9d. per lb., good Is., and ord. 3d. per lb. higher; second sort, 689 bales 4s. Ild. a 7s. Id., good 6d., and ord. and mid 2d. a 6d. higher; third sort, 388 bales 4s. 2d. a ss. 5d., last sale's prices to 3d. advance ; small pieces Malabar, &c., 193 bales 3s. Sd. a ss. 9c1., rather lower; 37 casks Nutmegs 4s. 9d a ss. 3d,, wormy 2s. 3d. per lb. ; 36 casks Mace ss. 9d. a 6s. 3d. per lb. ; S chests 5 bags Bencoolen Cloves ls. 3d. a Is. sd. per lb.; 211 chests Cassia Lignea 695. 6d. a 745. 6d. per cwt. This day 337 bags Pimento sold at 41d. a 4 %d. per lb.; 65 casks Jamaica Ginger from 6/. 7s. a 11/. per cwt. METALS.-In Metals generally more business bas been stirring lately. English Iron is firm at the advance. Copper and Lead fully maintain their prices. Swedish Iron has not been in sufficient stock or supply to admit of business; a few parcels have been sold at 11/. a 11/. 10s., and some to be delivered on board buyers ship at Gottenburg at 10/. ; of course this could only be done for a cargo, as in small quan tities, we mean when the buyer has to submit to such rates of freight as are very often paid from Gottenburg, the expenses would bring the cost here to very near 111. In Swedish Steel some transactions may be noted at 15/. 55., at which price further purchases might be made. Spelter, after dropping from 11/. ss. to 91. 7s. has again revived, some considerable pur chases having been made at 10/. 2s. 6d. and 10/. ss. ; at pre sent there arc no sellers, either on the spot or for forward delivery under 10/. 2s. 6d.; sales of any parcels shortly ex pected might be effected at 101., saving the landing charges. In Spanish Lead very little business can be noted, the price being so high in Spain as to prevent export without freights could be obtained lower; the lowest price at which good marks can be delivered on board in Spain is 10/. 17s. 6d , and it is likely to advance to 11/. 55., with the London discount, &c. ; the last transaction here was 12/. 7s. 6d., which price for the first marks would still be easily obtained. Of Foreign Copper the Cake smelted from the South American Ore continues to be expected chiefly for account of the smelters, and the supply of other qualities continues light; the last parcel was sold at our quotations. The quantity of Tin imported in the first three months from the East Indies was more than equal to a quarter coinage for Cornwall; East India being sold at so much less than English, and being really of a superior quality, will, now the supply is equal to the demand on the Continent, entirely supersede the use of British, unless by the reduction of taxation and the surrender of duchy dues on the part of the Crown, which is hardly possible, the British smelters be enabled to reduce the price, and resume their station cs purveyors to Europe. OlLS.—Oils generally firm, except Linseed Oil, wh;ch is a shade lower. EAST INDIA COMPANY'S INDIGO SALE, THIS DAY.—The quantity declared for sale was 6,620 chests. Pre vious to the opening the proprietors withdrew 471 chests, leav ing for sale 6,149 chests. 750 chests have passed the sale this day, of which 258 chests were Company's. The whole sold with spirit at an advanced on last sale of 2s. on the ordinary and middling qualities of Bengal and Benares, and 2s. 3d. and 2s. 6d. on the good and fine sorts, the greatest advance bear ing on the fine qualities, which have been mostly bought on speculation. Madras sold at an advance of Is. 6d. on the prices of last sale. Prices ruled as follows—Bengal and Benares from ss. Bd. and Bs. 3d ; Madras 4s. and ss. 2d., and a few chests of Pondicherry 2s. I Id. and 4s. Gd. RKETS. 11 E.—FRIDAY, July 5. From To Average. 317 Wheat, per barrel 20 stone 23 0 I 31 6 I 23 8 0 Bete l6 stone 0 0 0 IRISH MA] DUBLIN MARKET NO 48 16 stone' 13 0 1,849 Oats 12 stone' 8 0 15,758 Cwt. Flour.—. 9 stone 4 0 577 Oatmeal 8 stone 8 0 Sold to Bakers only. 12,960 Cwt. Flout . l4 9 I 19 0 I 19 IPA Average price of Wheal and Flour 40s. Od. per sack. Firsts, from 17s. Od. to 19s. Od. Receipts of Flour, 11,241 Seconds, from 14s. Od. to 16s. Od. Sales of no. "'"`' Thirds, from ss. Od. to 10s. Od. -01 - 0 10 6 I 9 0 1901 - 0 12 0 1 9 10 PRICE OF BEAU. ....IV. I Half Quartern Quartern Loaf. Wheat, Barley. Oats. Flour per cwt. „... per barrel per barrel per barrel ,----2—&— % 20 stone. 16 stone. 14 stone. Ist. 2d. — s. d. a s.d.ls.d. as. d. s. d. as. d. s. d. as. d. s. d. as. d. 220 24 6 12 0 130, 92 106 14 6 176 50 146 1220 259 94 120 82 —Ol6O 19 0 00 15 0 210 250 10 0 12C 80 9017 0 18 010 0 150 234 25 912 0 13 0 7 0 8216 0 17 013 0 166 250 27 010 0 11 0 7 0 8616 6 18 0 0 0 00 , Beef, Mutton, Pork, Butter. 1 per lb. per lb. per cwt. Ist. 2d. 3d. 4th. sth. 'd. a d. d. a d. s. d. a s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. 15 6 5 6 23 6 26 072 069 058 0 500 44 0 91 4831 434 0 35 0,74 068 062 0540 44 0 3 6 3 5 250 26 0'76 073070066 0 60 0 31 451 61 32 0 33 0:90740 0 9 _ 0 4 510 0 00 0070 60 0500— 0 0 s. d. a s.d.is.d. a Cork 220 24 6 12 0 Limerick 122 0 25'9 9 4 Waterford'2l 0 250 10 0 Cloninel 234 25 9 12 0 Carlow 25 0 27 0 10 0 Beef, 1 Mutton, 1 per lb. per lb. I d. a d. d. a d. 1 15 6 5 6 34 44'34 4 36 3 5 34 451 61 4 s#o 0 CorkrlJ Limerick— Waterfordl: Clonmel KILKENNY.—Butter 763 to 7Ss. per cwt. ; Wheat 245. to 265. per barrel ; Flour 20s. to 345. per bag; Oats 7s. to 9s. per bar. rel ; Barley 12s. to I3s. ; Beef 4d. to 54. per lb. ; Mutton 4d. to Sd. ; Potatoes 2d. per stone; Coals Is. 2d, per cwt.; Bacon Pigs 265. to 275. Od. per cwt. SCOTCH MARKETS. H A DDINGTON CORN 51 A RKET.—JuIy 5. Wheat. Barley. Oats. Pease. Beans. F irst 62.s (k 1 2Ss 6d 21s 04 2.9 s Od 29s Od Second s4s Od 2.6 s Od 193 6d 283 °d 9s Od Third 50s Od 24s Od 19s Od 26s Od —s Od Where were 456 qrs. of Wheat in market, 416 whereof were sold. 16 Unsold.-0 Grey. 'J. 14s. 1( 5-Nths , Average. DALKIE'I'H CORN MARKET. —July 4. Wheat. Barley. Oats. l'easc. Beans. first 6ss Od 29s fid 22s Od 31s Od 31s Od Second Ms Od 26$ 6d 20s Od 39s Od 30, Od third 46s Od 25s Od 18a Od I 29s Od 29s Od JUDGMENT..-SWIFT V. SWIFT. Sir Jonx NictioLL gave judgment in this interesting and important case to-day. The suit was one promoted by Mr. R. W. Swift against Citherine, his alleged wife, for a restitution of conjugal rights, it being alleged by Mr. Swift that he had con• tracted a marriage with Miss Kelly at Rome, and had con summated such marriage. On behalf of Miss Kelly it was pleaded that no fact of marriage had taken place; that if so, it was without the knowledge and consent of the lady; and it, was moat distinctly denied that any con summation of the marriage had occurred. The arguments in the case, which occupied some days, ►caving, concluded, Sir J. Nrcuoiht assigned this day for giving judgment. The Learned RIDGE stated the nature of the suit, and said the case ha 6 asfumed one of nullity of a❑ alleged mar riage contracted at Rome. If the marriage were esta blished, Mr. Swift would come into a large fortune, he having little or none at present, with the wife ; and she would be compelled to matrimonial rights with Mr. Swift. From what had occurred it was clear that no affection existed at present towards Mr. Swift in the breast of the young lady. The Learned Judge referred to the meeting of Mrs. Kelly and the Countess of Morland at Florence ; the intimacy formed between Miss Kelly and Mr. Swift, the son of the Countess ; their secret correspondence after proposals of marriage made by Mr. Swift had been re jected by the mother of Miss Kelly ; and the facts rela tive to the alleged marriage on the 25th March, 1831, between eleven and twelve o'clock, in an apartment occu pied by Mr. Swift. The question the Court had to de cide was, if this fact of marriage was valid by the laws of Rome ;if so,'it was good here and elsewhere. The Roman lawyer examined had declared that the canons of the Council of Trent required that a bona fide abjuration between the parties, situated as the parties in this case were, should b made. There was not a tittle of evidence to show that either had abjured their religion ; yet in the space of about fifteen minutes, on the 25th of March, it was contended that Miss Kelly had renounced her re ligion, and become a Catholic and married woman. The idea was monstrous, anti showed that the marriage cere mony had not been performed. The lady was anxious to repel the insinuation that marriage tights had been allowed to Mr. Swift. This was denied by the lady, nor was there any evidence to prove that that had been the case. He (Sir J. Nichol!) had read carefully the letters, in one of which it was argued the lady feared she was enceinte. The Court could not come to the conclusion that such a meaning could be put upon it. There was nothing to prove that conjugal rights had been yielded by this young lady. The calumny was false and scandalous. He should, therefore, dismiss Miss Kelly from all further observance of justice in the suit, and directed Mr. Swift to pay all the costs. Notice of appeal to the Lords of the Privy Council, it was stated, will be given. WESTMEATH V. WESTMEATH. This was a proceeding by the Marchioness of West meath against the Marquis of Westmeath for permanent alimony, a sentence of divorce, by reason of cruelty and adultery, having been obtained by her Ladyship against her Lord so long back as 1827. Dr. ADDAMS, for the Marchioness, contended that the net income of her husband was proved to be 5,7231., not including the rectoral tithes over 2,900 acres. The in come of the Lady was about 7161., not including 5001. she obtained as a Lady of the Bedchamber to the Queen, and a pension of 4001. He considered that the Court ought to decree 1,300/. permanent alimony to be allotted to the Lady. Dr. PHILLIMORE, for the Marquis, stated the net in come of the husband to be 2,1511. As to the tithes, it was impossible to collect them in Ireland. Sir Join; Nictiou. could not interfere with the private property of the wife; and as she would have 3,0001. a year if a widow, he should order 7001. a year to be paid as alimony, as well as 5001. a year pin-money, to be cal culated from February, 1827, when the divorce was pronounced. COURT OF EXCHEQUER. WILLIAMS V. JUDSON. This was an action brought to recover the sum of 801. alleged to have been due to the plaintiff by the defendant for work and labour performed by him. It appeared upon evidence that the plaintiff was for the space of one year general assistant to Mr. Judson, an apothecary, residing at Ware, in Hertfordshire, and was in the habit of visit ing his patients, and also of attending the sick poor in the workhouse. It was to recover compensation for such labour done that the plaintiff brought this action. Ver dict for the plaintiff—Damages 20/. KING V. THOMPSON. This was an action brought by Mr. King, a respectable woollen-draper of St. Pain's Churzhyard, agaitht the de fendant, the editor of a wtek'y paper cared the Satirist, to recover compensation for a libel published in that journal. The libel on which toe act'on was fourded -- was the publication of Mr. King's name in a list of persons described by the Satirist as frequenters of the notorious saloon. An attempt was made by the counsel for the defendant to convince the jury that the plaintiff was nth the person to whom the publication referred. The Jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 1001. ; costs 40s. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. QUEEN-SQUARE. THE ATTEMPTED MURDER. AND SUICIDE AT HAM-. MERSMITPI.-Yep , terday Charles Reynolds was brought up from St. George's Hospital, -.chore he has been con fined since !act Friday weak, and placed at the bm hefor: Mr. GREGORIF, charged with wilfully and maliciously shooting at and wounding Sarah Perry, with ..vhom he had formerly lived as fellow set vant, and afterwards at tempting to destroy himself. The pr-oner, who appeared to be under 20 yearF of age, was very much dejected ; his head was bound up, and the right side of the face was covered with plaisters. He had a number of friends in attendance, who took a great inte rest in his fate. Mr. GREGORIE asked if Sarah Perry waa in attendance to give evidence?—Mr. Hicks, the house surgeon of the hospital, said that she would not be able to attend for five or six days. The prisoner was out of danger. James Fisher, a police constable of the T division, No. 93, deposed to taking the prisoner into custody at the shop of Mr. Cos, surgeon, at Hammersmith, where he was having his wounds dressed. Mr. GREGORIE—Did be say anything when you ap prehended hint ? Witness—Yes, be said he was sorry he did not complete the job. Mr. GREGORIE (to the prisoner)—l take it for granted that you do not wish to say anything at present. Pri soner—Nothing at present. The prisoner was then remanded, and taken to Tothill fields Prison, where he will be taken care of in the In firmary until Sarah Perry is able to attend. It is the opinio❑ of his friends that the unhappy young man is labouring under an aberration of intellect. O. the day previous to his attempt to murder Sarah Perry he was at his mother's house, at No. 2, Norfolk-street, Islington, when he discharged a pistol at his own head, which, however, had no other effect than taking off some of the hair ; he afterwards seized a loaded pistol and pre sented it at his own sister, exclaiming, " By ---..,, I'll shoot you Sarah" (mistaking her for Sarah Perry), and it was only by his mother rushing in between them, and arresting his hand, that he bad not shot her dead on the spot. Notwithstanding this the prisoner has no symptoms of insanity about him, and converses in the most rational manner. The pistols, it appears, were loaded with shot. AMERICAN IMPROVEMENTS.—Extract of a letter from a gentleman in Washington to a friend in this city :—" We are going to have a splendid stone bridge across the Potomac river, to be erected at the expense of Government. A part of the old wooden one was swept away by the ice last winter. It belonged to a company, who have since sold their right to the United States, and Congress has appropriated money to commence the new one. It is to consist of 43 arches, about 96 feet span, and two draws across the channel, each SS feet. The width of the river is 4,924 feet, and the stupendous bridge which is to span it, will be wholly composed of granite. Estimates have been received by Government for building the blidge, and you may judge of the con sciences of the contracting candidates, when informed that the lowest estimate was one million and a half of dollars, and the highest seven millions! The first sum amounts to about 330,0001., and the last to 1,540,000/." —Scotsman. 'HOUSE OF LORDS, JuLr 9. At 5 o'clock, the LORD CHANCELLOR, the Marquis of LANSDOWNE, and the Duke of RICHMOND, took their seats as Lords C o mmissioners, -vben (the, House of Com mons having been summoned, and the Speaker. with many Members having appeared ;Lt the bar) the Royal Assent was given to the Exchequer Bills Bill, the National Debt Reduction Bill, Sergeants Inn Bill, and three private Bills. On the motion of the Marquis of LANSDOWNE, a conference wax ordered to be held wish the Commons, in order to communicate their Lordships' assent to the East Irdia resolutions. The Lords appointed were the Mar quis of Lansdowne (Lord President), the Earl of Cam perdown, .he Duke of Richmond, Viscount Sidi:Louth, the Bishop of Hereford, Lord Lyttleton, Viscount Sid, me °h, and Lore! Poltimore, who retired for the pur pose, baying been informed that the Commons waited. Earl RODEN presented a petition from a Presbytery i❑ the connection of the Synod of Ulster, against the new natio :al system of education for Ireland. Lord WYNFORD presented a petition from an indivi dual in Rochdale against the Local Courts Bill. The Conference then returned, and the Marquis of Lans downe acquainted the House that they bad communicated to the Managers of the Conference, on the part of the Commons, that their Lordships had agreed to the resolu tions without any amendment. The Eneenge from the Commons by the Lord Advocate and others, ~rought up the Royal Burghs (Scotland) Bil, the (Scotland) Bill, the Burgh Police (Scot land) Bill, and the Church Temporalities (Ireland) Bill, and a Private Bill. IRISH CHURCH TEMPORALITIES BILL. On the Irish Choweh Bill being brought up, The Duke of BUCKINGHAM rose and said, before that Bill went furth.r he wisled to know— Earl SHAFTESBURY requested him not to keep the Commons in waiting ; he could make his speech upon the motion for the firer. reading. The Duke of BUCKINGHAM—Is there no motion with regard to that Bill before the House? He was informed there was not, and the other Bills having been brought up, the Noble Duke said, seeing the Noble Earl at the head of the Government in his place, he wished to know from him when he meant to move the first reading of the Irish Church Bill ? Earl GREY said his intention was to pursue the very same course with it as with other Bills, that was imme diately to move that it be read a first time, and appoint a day for the second reading. The House could not possi bly know what the Bill was unless it was read a first time. The Duke of BUCKINGHAM said that he under stood that there were matters in it that would affect the prerogatives of the Crown. He wished to know whether the Noble Earl was authorized to bring down a formal message to show that his Majesty approved of the Bill, and consented to its clauses that affected him ? Earl GREY said he was prepared to give his Majesty's consent in the usual manner—that was by one of his Ma jesty's advisers, and not by a formal message. The Duke of BUCKINGHAM apprehended that when a surrender of the prerogative was asked for, it was ne cessary for their Lordships to inquire upon what evidence it was that his Majesty had been induced to make such surrender of the interests of his subjects. He believed it was necessary for the Ministers to bring down a regular message. Earl GREY believed that the Noble Duke was wrongly informed. The usual course was that his Majesty's consent should be expressed to the House by one of the Ministers of the Crown, stating that he was commanded by his Majesty to do so ; besides, their Lordships had been re commended to take this subject into their consideration in bis speech from the throne at the beginning of the session. The Duke of BUCKINGHAM said it would be better to bring down a formal message, in order that their Lord ships' orders might be kept up ; and in order that their Lordships might be assured that his Majesty authorized the surrender of his prerogative. Earl GREY repeated that it was not necessary to bring down a formal message on the subji ct. He was confirmed by the clerk at the table in saying that the usual course was for the consent of his Majesty to be given by one of his Ministers; and also that it was not tie , essary that it should be given on the first reading, but might be given upon any stage of the Bill. However, there could be no difficulty on the matter, as he was then prepared to give the required consent, or to bring down a formal mes sage, if that course were deemed necessary. Tl,e Duke of BUCKINGHAM said it was still his opinion that his Majesty should certify his consent to the House, and that their Lordships should not take one step without the Head of the Church consented to this, he would cell it, spoliation Bill. Earl GREY said he could certainly see no reason why any other than the usual course should be taken, or that his Majesty's consent should be obtained in the unusual course the Noble Lord opposite wished. lle, as a Minister of the Crown, took the responihility upon himself. More than this he did not think it necessary to state on the present occasion. The Duke of CUMBERLAND did not intend to op pose the first reading of the Bill ; but he thought suffi cient time should be given for the consideration of such an important question. Earl GREY said that, considering how long the Bill had been before the public, considering the intimate knowledge which had just been shown by the Nolle Duke (Buckingham), if he should hsve proposed even an earlier day than he now intended, he did not think the House woeld have had cause to complain. The day which he should propose would be Mondry, if it suites their Lordships' convenience. The Duke of CUMBERLAND said, that there had been so many alterations in the B;1; since it was presented to the House of Commons, that he defied any man to be acquainted with the exact terms of it. The Earl of ELDON said that it was rather curious thss the Noble ' rl opposite should oppose she motion for obtaining his Majesty's consent before the first reading of a Bill reciting that consent. Lord DACRE presented a petition from a place in cotnplainiug of the cornpuisory measure of the T:the Commutation Bill brought into the House of Com mons. On the suggestion of Lord WYNFORD, the petition was withdrawn, from the informality of referring to a Bill not in their Lordships' House. IRISH CHURCH REFORM BILL. The Bishop of BRISTOL presented a petition from the clergy of the diocese of Oxford, against the Bill relating to the Irish Churcb, which bad Just been read a first time. He quite concurred in the prayer of the petition. praying the H :cv,ia c h, i ( u iiilc se hblie w ibenen o ra u tly l fl d not agree to the Bill, for he had paid great attention to it as it passed the other House, and he must declare that he had never s ct l etr i toeas e mllt a ;a r gbhu d ileicoatssuthties,u rs ,:aird i nnc:thode a r : e i y t,vt Bill i fd l l et ahtsel Protestant death-blow re c tit h toa nt calculated tieeh uh Protestantn to lre: it aainbnrjli establish. o e . anent. It tended to destroy a church which, not only . in this country, but wherever it had been ages gn n e d sh t a h de order been t fi o r i subjectol p 8 firm est os tdhe supporter ou n tt o y f know ledge and liberty. He called, therefore, upon their Lord ships to reject it..—Petition laid on the table. DIPLOMATIC EXPENDITURE. The Marquis of LONDONDERRY moved for returns, which he understood were not objected to. When they saw the enormous sums which had been, or were to be, spent in carrying the plans of the Ministry into effect, he should not be thought wrong in wishing to know some thing of the details of them. He begged to move, therefore, for an account of the expenditure of the department of Foreign Affairs since the sth of January, 1827 ; an account of the secret service money expended in the Foreign Office, the Admiralty, and the Colonial Department ; an account of the extraordinary expenditure of the several missions of the Earl of Durham and the Duke of Wellington in 1832 and 1826 ; and also of Sir S. Canning's mission to Madrid.—Motion granted. SCOTCH BURGHS. The Earl o f HADDINGTON rose t o as k a question with respect t o t h e t h ree Bill s re l at i ng to S co tch Burghs, just brough t up intimatelyfromthe Commons. As those Bills were now on th e ta bl e o f t h e H ouse , h e th ou ght the time was a c rt o m ts: n a t : which he might be permitted to put a ques tion to th e Noble Lord at the head of the Home Department, lajes session, ty took the Government, at It would b e i n the recollection of with those f e allt i h t ose Noble Lords who had att en d e d to t h e procee di ngs o f t h e House, that his commencementannouncing of the t hpre sentetr earliest the oeeatti o occasion of tons of the burghs of England and Scotland. With respect to the English boroughs, it was stated by Ministers that Lire constitution of no one English borough precisely re s..m:bled another, it was necessary to precede legislation by inqui:y with respect to England, but the Scotch boroughs in their constitution being all nearly similar, the cause for ing:iiry did not exist with respect to them. He was not n w about to itiluire whether the adoption of such a view was satisfactory or not, or whether there were not things connected with the Scotch boroughs that had made out a case to precede inquiry by legislation.—(Hear.) It had, however shortly appeared, that although with re spect to Scotland inquiry was not to precede legislation, yet still that inquiry was to take place; because it appeared by the Order Book of the House of Commons, that, some time in April, Dave was given to brine in a Bill for a. Commission to examine into the Scotch Burgiu. Now what be wished to know was whether it was the itention of Isis Majesty's Government to proceed with le. Commission, and also with the Bill? Lord MELBOURNE said that the Commission would have to inquire into many points not provided for in the Bill, and, such being the case, he felt it his duty not to delay proceeding with the Bill till the inquiry under the Commission had taken place. The Archbishop of DUBLIN presented petitions from :he clergy of the dioceses of Dublin and Waterford re- spectin g the Irish Church Temporalities' Bill. They ex pressed their readiness to assent to some alterations in the exiting condition of the Irish Church, but they prayed some modifications in the Bill now before the He must say that several of the alterations suggested by the petitioners had been already adopted by the other House. In reference to the present and other petitions on the same subject, he thought that one charge lay virtually against not only the supporters of the Bill, but - against some . of the objectors, for many of the latter class were content that certain al terations should be made in the state of the church. Many Noble Lords contended that the coronation oath pre- vented his Majesty from giving his Royal Assent to such a Bill. These petitioners were not of that opinion, for, though they did not approve of parts of the Bill, they yet prayed for some alterations. They considered that the Coronation Oath bound the Sovereign in his executive and not in his legislative capacity. One circumstance which ap peared to him to prove the correctness of this interpreta tion was that no similar oath was administered to the other two branches of the Legislature. If applied to the Sove reign in his executive capacity only the oath would be in telligible enough ; but, if it applied to him in his legisla tive capacity, this consequence must follow, that they would have four in place of three branches of the Legis lature, namely, King, Lords, Commons, and the Corona tion Oath. Those who drew up the Coronation Oath, and were long in their graves, would thus have a voice in the Legislature. He was no friend to hasty legislation, but in his opinion the Legislature ought to be guided by discretion and prudence, and not by the Coronation Oath, considered as binding on the Sovereign in his legislative capacity. I hat oath was intended to guard against the encroachments of the prerogative on the rights of the other branches of the Legislature. The Earl of ELDON never expected to have heard in that House the highest ecclesiastical authority in the Church of Ireland say that the two other branches of the Legisla ture took the Coronation Oath as well as the King. When the proper time arrived he should be prepared to discuss this point with the Right Rev. Prelate. If the Right Rev. Prelate's interpretation of the oath was a correct one,it would be impossible to frame any oath that would be binding. Earl GREY should be prepared at any other time to maintain that the opinion of his Right Rev. Friend was the correct one, and that his interpretation of the Corona tion Oath was consistent not only with the principles of the Constitution but with sound reason. In this view he was supported by the very beet and greatest auttoirities, who always considered the oath as applying to the King in his executive, and not in his legislative capacity. They would have other opportunities of entering upon this vexala questio. His Right Rev. Friend did not say that the two other branches of the Legislature took the Coro nation Oath as well as the King. What he said was, that if the oath bound the King in his legislative capacity it ought to be taken equally by the other two branches of the Legislature. Both Houses of Parliament did not take it, and from thence his Right Rev. Friend concluded very fairly that it did not bind the King as a Member of the Legislature. The Earl of ELDON said when the proper time ar rived he would state his opinions on the subject. He would feel no dissatisfaction at being beaten if he satisfied his own conscience. The Bishop of EXETER totally differed from the Noble Earl and from the Right Rev. Prelate. As the Noble Earl bad pledged himself to br:ag forward this subject hereafter, he should deter saying any more till he heard the arguments of the Noble Earl. Earl GREY did not pledge himself to bring forward the subject. He gave no formal notice. What he said was, that when the opportunity was given he should be prepared to maint tin the opinions he always did upon this point. The Dis:lop of EXETER alluded to what fell from the Nohe Earl not upon this, but on a former occasion. Earl GREY—Upon the occasion alluded to he said only . .vhat he said now, that he should be prepared to maintain his opinion on the coronation oath, either against the Right Rev. Prelate or any other Noble Lord. The Doke of CUMBERLAND understood the Noble E-rl to say that the coronation oath had nothing to do with thi.. Bill. Now in his opinion there never was any question intro(! tcei into Parliament more nearly eon :.etited with the eoront.'ion oath thin this. _ Earl GREY—Such might be the opinion of the Illus trious Duke. It3ut he was no less coc.ident in his cvn opinion than the Illusti lolls Duke was in hi,. The Duke of CUMBERLAND—Let the N , ble Earl look to the fifth article of the Act of Union. kVould he day this Bill was not inconsisten- with it ? Ea.l GREY had lojked at eat article and at th, coro nation oath, as carefully, perhaps, as the Illustrious Duke, and he came to tht. conclusion *iiat the assent of the Crown to this Bill was not inconsistent with de • r. The Bishop of PETERBOROUGH presented a peti tion against the Irish Church Temporalities Bill from the clergy of Peterborough. The Earl of RODEN (resented similar petitions from a parish in Ireland, the name of which we could not learn; from the Archdeacon and Clergy of the diocese of Meath and Kells ; from a certain body of seceders ; and from the Irish Society of London. The latter body prayed that if the Bill passed, provision should be made for preaching the Gospel to the people of Ireland in Irish. He cor dially supported these petitions, and should feel it his duty, at the very outset, to give this Bill all the opposition in his power. The effect of it would be to destroy the Church pooperty of England and Ireland, and with that every other species of property which was held by the same guarantee. His great objection, however, was, that it struck the most deadly blow at the reformed Church of Ireland. He felt this subject deeply, having lived long, indeed having spent the greater part of his life, in Ireland, and witnessed the blessings and advan tages the Protestant Establishment there conferred on the country. He felt confident that nothing but the Pro testant religion could eventually deliver the people of Ireland from that spiritual slavery to which they were so long subjected. LOCAL COURTS BILL. The LORD CHANCELLOR having moved the order of the day for the third reading of the Local Courts Bill, end the question being put that the Bill be now read a third time, Lord WHARNCLIFFE opposed the motion. He hoped they would not be deterred from doing their duty by any thing that might be said or done out of doors. They were told the eves of the public were upon them ; that they were not disposed to act justly and fairly by the people; but if their Lordships considered the measure as likely to be injurious to society, they ought to reject it. If they did not do so, of what use were their Lordships ?—(Hear.) His objections to the Bill were, first, that it presented itself to them under false pretences. He admitted that the law, as regarded the recovery of small debts, was such as required the interposition of the Legislature ; but this Bill introduced new principles and new forms. He ad mitted that some counties were too large, and that in consequence the expense of witnesses was greatly increased. This might be remedied by holding the assizes oftener, and in more places than one in a county. Another com plaint was the expense of fees. If the fees were too high in the present Courts, why not reduce them? It sounded very well to say that the people ought to have an opportu nity of settling their disputes speedily and cheaply. He entertained some doubts of the policy of speedy j ustice. This Bill, be it remembered, granted a remedy in these 2 (—) ( /Val 0 6 C , urts in cases of 1;bel, s'ander, sod varihttftiptWoOli. N , mr, with a resident Judg e , with a ep:iiretl4lVl64 siring only of six, and with the a ssi,tann64, he roust be permitted to expr P. his fits anticipated from this me.sure. The effect_ 0-411tfr" — „ easure, if carried, would be to increase all soit'slerlik.' 4ll •"" tion. They had been told by the Noble Chief B:ron of the Court of Exchequer that the Bar gene rally were opposed to its adoption. At present men 1,0 practised at the Bar in Westminster Hall, &c., ere accustomed to pay the most profound regret to e decisions of the Judges who presided over the Supe. riLer theCour Bts,wil, however, hlilearc,ongt thesehel m a e b m i rs feeling o f the existed. Under Bar, ho were men of high attainments, might have as their antagonists in this new Court men who o , ight be the lowest sort of attorneys, who were proposed to be admitted into these courts (and when he spoke of attorneys he did not mean to speak disrespectfully of them as a body). Was it possible for gentlemen to practise in this court, seeing the high-minded feeling of the profes sion? And then, again, hew would this measnreaffect the bar, as to its immediate interests? He would say that their Lordships were bound to b.ok to this. It did a, pear to him (Lord Wharncliffe) that this Bill opened e door to great abuse. Pot they were told that this 13 was introduced for the poor man's sake. In what seise could it be said to be for the sake of the poor man that this Bill was to pass? Were their Lordships to he t .Id that, in this coontly, the rights of the poor were t.amplel on from Lee want of the means of redress for injuries received ? He thought that when their Lordships looked to the state of society,they would find no man to say that the rights of the poor were not especially attended to. With respect to the rich, he could not see how the provisions of thie Bill could affect them, seeing that a rich m yes debt was generally fur a larger sum than 201. They had been called upon, by the example of Scotland, to adopt this Bill, and they had been referred to the Sheriff.' Court in Scotland. He could not say much as to the pr ietice of this court, but this be did know, that as iss was at present carried on, it was by no means a court to' w rich he should be glad to intrust his rights. He must; also say, that he considered that the Scotch people were by no means indisposed to litigation. After a few further observations, the Noble Lord concluded by moving that this Bill be read a third time this day six months. The Earl of ROSSE considered that with the twoend ments which might be made to the measure it might be so framed as to confer great benefit on the country. He hi Id that the two great principles on which this Bill was founded, were cheap law and the bringing it near home. Th,, Earl of WICKLOW entered into some of the de tails of the measure, and concluded by declaring his in. tendon to oppose the Bill. Lord LYNDHURST had been charged—within h e would not say—but he ban been charged out of the House with being influenced by party motives in his opposition to this measure ; and he would beg leave to state the position in which he stood with respect to this Bill. When his Noble and Learned Friend on the Woolsack first intro duced this Bill into their Lordships' House, he (the Lord Chancellor) bad stated—and he had distinctly stated if that this was not a Government measure, but that it w.. 11 brought in upon his own personal responsibility. He (Lord Lyndhurst) bad expressed to bis Noble and Learned Friend is private the opinion which he entertained of this Bi. 1; and therefore his Noble and Learned Friend must have known that he intended to give it his decided opposition. And, if since that period the measure had been adopted by his Majesty's Government, there could be no reason why he (Lord Lyndhurst) should shrink from dechring the opinion which he bad originally formed, and there could be no reason why he should not express that opinion with confidence to their Lordships. He wished, in the first place, to direct their Lordships attention to the very commencement of this which appeared to him to be, upon the very prin ciple on which it was formed, liable to the greatest objection. It was not stated in the first clause of the Bill that it was his Majesty's wish, or that it was the intention of the Parliament, to establish a certain number of Judges with certain limited jurisdic tions, and of certain emolument and appointments inci dental to these offices. All this was not stated ; but un limited power, nevertheless, was given to the King's ,Government, or rather to one member of it, that member being his Noble and Learned Friend, to create any nutn ber of offices which he, in his judicial or discretionary power, might deem to be necessary. He might nominate any number of Judges, with appointments of 2,0001., with any number of Registrars, with salaries of '7OO/. or SOW., and an unlimited number of other officers. He would say that such a principle of legislation must be productive of the most injurious consequences. He knew, indeed, that his Noble and Learned Friend had personally no wish whatever to avail himself of this patronage; and he had stated as much in his (Lord Lyndbuntes) beating in that House that their Lordships were not to legislate for the Noble and Learned Lord. He might not always hold the office which he so honourably filled that day. He (Lord Lyndhurst) could suppose a person of popular talents and of the great eloquence of the Noble and Learned Lord, but not blessed with his moderation—he could imagine the case of a person anxious for power, indifferent to the existing institutions of the country, and ambitious o fd f , b o e u i r n , g a t u h d e founder of th a e n re e r w ore sy s to tem establish d eeir o t a i s s o u f b popular l power; and, should there at any time be a person hold ing the office of Lord Chancellor, what better instant could he bake to consolidate his power than by such a measure as this ? He implored their Lordships to take a vew of the power and influence which this patronage must bring to a Lord Chancellor who seas the dispenser of the ecclesiastical patronage of the Crown to an immense extent. He appointed Magistrates of the country, and in addition to this he was to L ,ve the appointment, the direct nomination, of thirteen of the Judges of the land; be had the absolute appointment of the Judges of the new Bankruptcy Court ; and if to these their Lord ships, threw into the scale the appointment of tl.irty or forty Judges and Registrars proposed by this Bill, it would be seen that, armed with these powers, with this consolidation of power, any individual poeiessing popular talents, and choosing to avail himself of this patronage, must become a formidable character. T. , ese were some of the grounds on which he opposed this Pell, which threw an immense weight of patronage into the hands of his Majesty's Ministers, or rather into those of one Member of the Gos anment, which he thought was wholy inconsistent with the Constitution. His No -1:00 and Learned Friend was anxious to divest the Bill of this character ; he turned the matter over in his mind as to where thi patr. - -age should be vested ; but at last be bound t. .at it could nowhere be vested with so much pro priety as in himself. Passing from this, however, their Lordships would perhaps allow him to enter upon another subject; he meant the Act of Parliament passed to regu• late the fees of the Court over which be (Lord Lyndhurst) presided, and that enabled him to speak of the expense ef that establishment, which amounted altogether to about 35,000/. ; and he knew no reason why the other Courts should be more expensive than his was, nor, indeed, was he aware that they were. The whole expense of the three superior Courts of Westminster Hall amounted to 100,000/., and this was the expense of administering the ts hole body of civil and criminal law throughout this great metropolis ; whereas the expense attendant upon the plan of the Noble and Learned Lord would be 150,0001. Thus, by a system by which it was proposed to transfer a part of those duties which were now performed by the other Courts, one-half more expense would be incurred than for the whole of the three Courts in Westminster Hall. He appealed to what had been stated by his Noble and Learned Friend, that they ought not to consider money in this case; and if he (Lord Lyndhurst) were sure that, by incurring an addi • rional expense, they would improve . the administration of justice, and that it would do good, be agreed that they ought not to be too parsimonious ; but he felt that this was a measure of doubtful policy. Nothing could be more pernicious than the system of local Judges. It appeared that by this Bill, however, there were to be four Judges in the idea Riding of Yorkshire. Each Judge was to be established in a narrow district, but was not to be confined to one spot, but to go over his district, knowing as be went every party, every witness, every • juryman who might appear before him from time to time ; and thus his •'eci&ons must be liable at least to an imputation of par. tislity, if not of suspicion. It was a principle which had existed formerly in that House that the system of Local Courts was objectionable on account of the partiality which it gave rise to ; and so strongly was the country impressed at that time with the evils of local judicatures and Judges that an Act of Parliament was passed with great caution to prevent the Judges of Assize going the Circuit where they had practised before as advocates. He alluded to the Statute of Henry the Eighth, the preamble ..f which, after referring to previous Acts passed, set fortb n e great injury which had arisen from the adininistriasttuiore it justice by Local Courts. He said t hat the Legis e d w ith the evils it that period were not only imPr" spot, ot, and admi rising from the Judges residing taree°nbut when they went on iiistering justice at their own doo r , passed to prevent them in occasional progress a sew was houses or property. ruin going where they p d But what was the groan of the repeal of that ? It was because, practically speaking , the j t ()gee never r esided an y where except in the me tropolis; or their residences were so casual that w oe of these inconveniences could arise. He said, itialhi r 6 tern Fil. S.< ."` S. S. .s. --)' ,s. k oral ina9C 0 01' riso t s 7ith 113 P Lot. e.O lima nt s( en, to ti" Tbe t te l e n.. 1 s 3*F go" . .„gerie teoll )0 1 $ t face Ot bi Ty '2 CIO nte, ('‘ 0, fr