The Sun. — London, England, 1833-07-30 00:00:00

lost et d tbat ir app thope P, to nok e Protest 0 Istruc tion t upon W d e clars ti4 Ole insert° "y ! noio .00 i dare hi'D °e d and ROO; bancellor be mel d e d ;ht be a /30 1 there. so d f Baroo d jp h t stall tts as to be , o is le WOtil i e not ole id wraisaion d consentol his Coto de a gross Li y whiCl i Y trust. td consolte, l itted an oiPt' vide for ad hear ,e ith earP rl' O d a clato e l o due seco r d and Leer f i t bu c c , i[ v of that ,0 farquis 1. keeping' ble the P' ) vas .... n S . - Zoglan d . 6 td he , e tr mere al - o tel ;tonere; was d IL 4°ll ;2LLOrit °I 11 ,11 n on AP° beja .1 0 I be , - - t il l ice t bf ' t . l i tt i , ye that fr ibP i ber of ' ,0 the r e d Aiwa to e e 3 2 d t t ce effect' t 0f t he 01 I r Fel Oa L e Y, however 5 of r ide o prov r . oe I. tow t o hope chill/ 'o' e a u itoo the ti nseif °"/ r Rithout soma equivalent to the same purpose /? He thought it an evil precedent for the land it it, the ch urch, and for that reason he protested ieliteantstboratetlclANe hRIChARDE cess h s u a l i d d btehaattaxit upon i b u A t tax n ot relative to ' the poor might be levied on a fttx relative to the church. e ,:qtri of HARROWBY said that any burden im 'Pon the occupier necessarilyfell upon the landlord, s e tth e , Poor rate, or church rates. It was in fact. ght to be, the lan in Ireland that paid the church 1 . 1 , 4 he wished much to know what could be said in t i i i:ii i to that statement. It might be the case that th at al . l4l °4la would have to pay ; but was it not the h estaihni.every country where there was a national t it ehure t Meat all persons were liable to the support th e L i , A person might be of a different opinion Itia t t rture, but he must abide by their acts. A ?t th an th ° I opinion that the law of Scotland was et' i n r c e I,aw of England, but was he on that ground that e ought etsubie. to 6 pay taxes ? He might think wh I , l tould b e eno militia, but was that . any lea.on they : 4 ? w i ,,..empted from bearing his share of 1 lerty, si i," respect to the church, if a man purchase( Idtie es. „ - ",at did he purchase ? Nine-tenths . of the a t e i °tfl ing more —and he paid in proportion. It ‘to m e " no man. It was not a usual act of jus rtienht ' 11 burden off the land and throw it upon reli o f v el a'''. If this measure once passed, the kite el and was n o t safe. Passive resistance had beep -reti a 4 discourses, and by those who ought to t 55.11,.„ 'ue Mini s t ers o f peace .—(H ear , hear.) Pas -- all T e bad been carried to such an extent that, ,ia th e tue aid of Government, hardly one shil- Woe i n Pe, °Lid could be collected. If that was not N, e i tela - V"v it was, at least, rebellion in fact. \ e loth thati when the tithe should be placed on the I d be o t i; w ould be well. He denied that the tithe 4 the ° Wu upon the landlords ;it would be thrown ti, ; 4l When t h ere were new l eases , b u t in subsisting it y e •t la Wo u ld remain as they were. All the au- I titsi la te Was inefficient ; bow, then, except from ele tsb e at was out of l e ase. Was it possible that in i t tai l next the clergy of Ireland could have the means i 14 4 . ' t ,miterable existence ? The destruction of the " r diff ei e 4 'd not be averted unless measures were taken L t e. I f " from those which it was our misfortune to Falie s l e l ho ped that Ministers would consider before No ' Th e ev the church of Ireland was to be . supported. s n it ' of RIPON said that the question before the . acti o 4 not one which called for, or warranted, the in .tri. k . ll °f the topics brought forward by the Noble `letil,7l4,co.ust protest against the assertion of his Noble ~4 t ese u ' in the course Government had pursued for the g i e rdise ve of the law in Ireland they had been guilty of Iti a l l eo of duty. He ha d heard that charge repeat [ia lkirbdle:t7lachtust u h r e e - . ll: r a c el ut n nt v a e n r ce y s e , t heard from any Noble or any thing like intel- Lett4gotnent, by which it could be sub (tantiated. Go tlia t , l 'ad not had recourse to the Coercive Act, and r ,,, , , it was wise policy not to have recoursa to such 4 4 ,4s 4 ei l in ary measure without absolute necessity, but it S i r 4% "ecu stated that in the mode in which the wantlaws Whit t there had been any itn.diffT r i e th n e e s e ° b r ad no itig ish: r.. _ the part of Government. th 4* ever to do with this case about church cess. 1 , 4 e1i ' l a rate which each person was to pay to the Vi at" e liejii of the produce of the soil, and every person 0 4 th e , a nd held it liable to that charge. He denied lin - d • e ; *mild be any justice in throwing upon the land 1,1: 40 . , . I.l °l l o f the church cess which was levied upon 1. 4 4 i n c maintained that the Catholics of Ireland were cutla e , l 'very different situation from the Dissenters of 4 4 1 : 1 1eZ h i o ° , c . the grossest . injustice had been done to the pof y fe , at the period of the Reformation, and for a th_ bett. e .. 4 r i a i subseque rr n E tly.. 1 etr aeh rl is of BU said that his ob'ect in proposing ` 4 lsl i i 444 tent was to show to the wo j rld that if their I N a P t consented to this clause and to the Bill, they did 11 15 'batt er of necessity. S oy atuendment was negatived without a division. I t att,„ tr al verbal amendments were th e n agree d t o , a f ter a . o tteCition across the table, the purport o f w hi c h did not 4 the gallery. to th:evi , clause was brought in by Lord GREY relative ke t h it Puweis to be given the Commissioners. We wer e ttts to catch its tendency from the low tone in which it m oved, Th Ois e , e third reading of the Bill was then ordered to take I°-toorrow.—Adjourned. 84 0 ,„ LING INTELLIGENCE-(THIS DAY FROM LLOYD'S. bea E —Arrived from the Iti v L, JULY 29 .—Wind E.N. . Bombay. h " , knd sailed, the Lady Ra ffl es, 1. d on JULY 29.—Wind f ß o :, l3 — om Arrived from Sailed tl 4 °ll the 1-adY Raffles Pollock, for Bombay. „Duk e of Bedford, Bo ' en. for Bengal. LIIIOUTH, JULY 287 Wind variable. Apti,AL_.2tlouTu, JULY 2 8. —Wind variable, ahath. ,th e Joseph light breeze..ar.o—in 1 " ect °it port, 1 .4 Ira % t,sitPooL, JULY 28.—Arrived the Ainrwell, Power : Vtoeliuhi_.aih.Royal George, Dawson, from Africa 14,,„ .",,morn Narva. fron,gytkoav'Ex, JULY 28......Atrived the Thetis, Hewitt, b Antigua. r t. t i t o il i t i tie ":, JULY 28.—Arrived the Isab b e et ll h a, an h d lo A rr n i n s: ftllt 4 : 4l l JULY 28.—Arrived the Eliza 1 )13; 4° '" Quebec. tlitst.btit, JULY 2 7.—Arrived the Eleanor, from RI- I sz ti ew ip t h , ni tt eli 3 ; ot ir : ti ! t 3 . %it: Eliza, Webster, from Marva. —Arrived fromthe b . %I N pr .ee, Baxter , Quebec ; lahte.rin,gsfit•oonm, B1"th. "tet t b„ 1 oas Ilichebucto ; Express, Akester, from St. .11/418,,k4t/t, JULY 29.—The Hopewell Andeersons, tt`rd a „ -4( l literland to Rotterdara, was brought , in her y e. 4 vh assistance, having sprung a leak. ....... THE '-'--i, r UNDS.-(THIS DAY.) „ rh. CITY, TWELVE O'CLOCK. ' t e - report Pep frigate f Which prevailed yesterday of the arrival of the tAk ' , 4 1 ° be °. i n Lisbon with the surrender of that capital, b y 'll or Lis ° ' ,l of foundation. We attribute the delay of . the the Pile, u en to the following information we have received h4r N ”? l • tet f rom that capital :—" In regard to politics, 4 6 e n ot as ' l l the Algarves are but going on slowly. They Oat itr o s let t a l r . kei ti roaati ou •-n Possession of Beja or Sines, but by the t o jO, v elY. Ththey are close to these places, which I know 41, -- ' n 000 wh o have sent from Lisbon 1,000 men, which are 1, 4 ther. Wun have -1 0 1 101 ~ tinited With from Abrantes to Alentejo, 4 6ki ~". Will the twelve hundred under General Viii l ' - - wh., f° rni a body of about five thousand men, 4 l- - Pedroites will have to fight." General he tittle m tie: 41 d not be able to proceed on Lisbon before he v , -eel th Le General Mollellos. This, no doubt, has re. v! P h e te a : ° Perations of Admiral Napier, as we well know they 4 P l ot ..t in concert in the capture of Lisbon ; and should e the b e b . 4 eperat. defeated, his retreat would for some days impede t s ' r ed. I°l is at Lisbon. It is also stated that the Migue i e —p at , '"ed a body of troops to reinforce the capital. A W ) ,eh ,„ THE FUNDS. e ' , ave at- to arrivals, not even a ship letter, consequently ta a treat scarcity of news. th t inch is ., - Ate. o „ - vened at the price they left off yesterday 44 tsslriottn,lNvith little doing. B9 1,1 % for We., HALF-PAST ONE. Without any information from Portugal, or even .livis,.i 844.:rierrael; anziety prevails for accounts . from Oporto, expected that ere this Don Miguel hasmade Ft 2o rloh e i a _ttelnpt to take that city. 9 re, th e been during the whole of the morning at Zil4 the ' le A ccount ; at present they are 89 . I‘ to IA . ntit,,P_Qreign Market Portuguese Scrip reached 13, but v is - 7e, ~,:o a rals from that quarter a reaction has taen nee. "g them "IP is now 111 ; Greek Scrip maintains its Coli..!s for The Account, 99? :3 apepel'i Ce51:44ee1inttk..C:1‘5'ett.1111%!..........1.1...2R89°8110E S. Per cent. ......... 891 el';:r ent. It;:i ......... 96 i 4 Per Per Cent ........ 41 to. !! ............. 7.... vat Je4.10,1. to expire Oct. ikg,!?................. 17 5-16 Jan . iro: ............... IV 1-16 411 Itti., • .......... REIG e lgi„' , ,s Per cent. ...... 97+ atazni', o,Per cent ......... 4 littennah nonds ............. 69i chi lia 1 Ayres, 6 per ent 241 tolthrl. 6 Per cent.. . . . bbitt - *" 14 6, 6 per cent ...... n ah:411624... .................. 241 ..................... 741 Ate),, 5 Per cent. ;825... 34. itto"l''' 5 Pern:i. per cent. ...... 34 ~- Per cent. ............ 421 ' 4 . 6 , 6 per cent. ...... 211 THREE O'CLOCK. to 14 .—FOUR O'CLOCKS India Stock '24o Ditto 80nd5.... .......... 32 pm South Sea Stock 9 9 1, Ditto Old Ann Sit Ditto New Ann. B7 Ex. Hills, 1000/. 57 'pm Ditto sno/ 57 pm. Ditto Small 57 pm. Bank St. for Acc. 207 Consols for Opg 89 1 India St. for Opg. 240 1 FUNDS. Porttig;;;se, 5 per cent.... 76 Ditto, Reg. Sci ip 111 pm Prussian, 5 per cent. Russian Bonds, 5 per cent los+ Ditto, Metallic 9B+ Spanish, 5 per vent 2o+ Ditto, 1823 lBl French 5 per Cent 104 f. 73c. Exchange 2sf. 70c French 3 per Cent 77f. 50c. Dutch, 2+ per cent 491 Ditto, 5 per cent 949 COURT CIRCULAR. pi:_lie Ambassadors and Ministers of Russia, Austria, 1 , g ee, and Prussia, had a conferenc e with Viscount PAL : -atit,,,„ t,.._ S e, afternoon, at the Foreign-o ffi ce. .Their s C'veliencies and his Lordship were upwards of three hour 4 dtellheration. c-fictitsi BONAPARTE visited Earl GREY yesterday, at is residence in Dawning -street. pffi°"lnttches were received yesterday at the Colonial cs (Foln the L ieut , -Governo r of Sierra Leone. cage of tt i ave eat 'd expre ssi . tw o to the 1 41 A the Ciths aeon whi t , answer,_, A negou': t that th e " )ort. -30 ort had bet; amend ate"' he Duke that eoeA %t be Wee d Ireland. on unae e cv, d be Ar nit an Are le Protest° 'CRICKS OF STOCKS THIS DAY AT ON K O'CLOCK. Rink Stcv,c 9 per Cent. Red. q9%34 4 India Stock -..- ... 239 3 per Cenr.Cons. 8934 % 9 Ditto Bonds 3O 32 Pm 334 per Cent. — South Sea Stock Ditto' Red 97 6% Old Annuities -- New 334 per Cent. 96% %IA New Ditto.... ........ .-.....— 3 per Cent. Ann. 1726 .... 3 per Cent. Ann. 1751 .... I per Cent. 18 . 26 ' 10334% Ex. Bills, £l,OOO 56 57 pm. B ink Long Ann. to expire Ditto ..... .......500 56 57 pm. Jan. 5, 1860 I7M 3-161 Ditto Small 56 57 pm. Oct. 10, 1859 1734 1-16 ( Ditto Commercial. pm. - Jan. 5, 1860 — I Ditto Advertised pm. Jan. 5, 1880 — Bank for Account ...... ... Aprils, 1880 — India for Account ...... ...- Jan. 5, 1870 — 'Cons. for Opening 9()%14 PRICES OF FOREIGN FIJNOS Austrian Bonds 4 175 Belgian Bonds 94 Ditto Account 9'314' 4 Brazilian Bonds 7O IA Ditto Acc0unt......... 69 3 4 70 Buenos Ayres Bonds 9.”4 THIS DAY AT ONE 0 CLOCK. Peruvian Bonds 9 1% 2 ! Portuguese Bonds ... 76 4 5% Ditto Account 764 6 . _ Regency Scrip 121 12 11 pm. Ditto Account 121 12 11,1 pm. Prussian Bonds Ditto Bonds, 1822 lOl4 Russian Bonds, 1822 lO5 Ditto Account 103% Ditto Kccount Chilian Bonds ... Ditto Account 27 Columbian Bonds 22% Ditto Account. New Loan 98% Spanish Bonds, 1821 ... 21 20N Ditto Account...2o% 1 . 4 . N 1,1 Ditto Bonds, 18 . 24 Ditto Acc , iint `. 4 Danish Bondi 73% 4 1 4 Ditto Accent creek Bonds 32 Ditto Bonds, 1825 Ditto Account Mexican Bonds, 5 per cent 33 , 4 Ditto Account Ditto Bonds, IRV Ditto Account Ys French Rentes, 5 p. c. —l. —c. Exchange —f —c. per cent —f. Exchange —f —c. Dutch, '4 p. c 49% %g Ditto Account ...... % Ditto, 5 p. c 4!4% Ditto Account g French Scrip fl. Pm. Ditto, 6 per cent 43X1 3 Ditto Account 43 Neapolitan 02 PRICES OF SHARES TPIIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCF. Paid. Per Share, Anglo Mex. Min. Co. (iss. at 5/. pm.) £lOO 14 Bolanos Mining Company ..£l5O 150 Brazilian Mining Company Brazilian Imp. Min. Co. (iss. at 5/. pm.) £2O 61 Ditto National 17% 25 Ditto St. John Del Rey Ditto Cocaes 5 1 Cata Branca Mining Company 1 6 7 British Iron Mining C om pany £5O 191 4 Columbia] Mining Co. (iss. at 5/. pm.) 50% 114 English Mining Company 12% 29)4 General Mining Association l2 Hibernian - Mining Co. £lo Mexican Mining Co. £4B Real dcl Monte Mining C 0...., — United Mex. Min. Co. (iss. at 2/. pm ) 40 Ditto New Sc] ip 5 Alliance Fire Insurance Comp lO Protector Insurance Comp. Australian Co. Canada Company General Steam Navigation Co National Provincial Bank of England 5 Provincial Bank of Ireland 25 10% Z 1 6 MAILS. Arrived. Due. Arrived. Due. O America 0 0 Hamburg 0 0 Brazil O Buenos Ayres I 0 Jamaica.... ........ .... O Carthagena 0 0 Leeward Islands ... 0 1 Dublin 0 0 Lisbon 0 O Flanders 0 0 Malta .. 0 1 France 0 0 Sweden O Guernsey&Jersev.. 0 1 Waterford 0 HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORROW. Morni ..:2 minutes after 2.1 Evenine...2s minute• after 2 1 , ,, ~,,,... ~.__,_i_ c ._ ... . tfl_7bt g - ~-- fft ->-'' Vitt* ~„.. .-..,m\-45-,)...: LONDON, TUESDAY EVENING, JULY 30, 1833. The Church Temporalities Bill has passed through another stage in the House of Lords. The report of the Committee on the Bill was last night received and agreed to by a majority of 68 to 38. The Earl of WINCHILSEA was the only Peer who put himself prominently forward in opposition to the further progress of the Bill. He acknowledged, most frankly, but strangely, that lie had not followed this Bill into Committee, so that not having attempted to improve the Bill because it was so bad (a reason, we should have thought, for making the attempt) he was bound in consistency to move that the report be received that day six months. The Noble ELrl, with his usual good fortune, stumbled upon a mare's nest of no small beauty. He had been informed that the surplus which would have arisen under the 147th clause, had been offered to the Catholic clergy, and had been refused by them. Lord GREY thought it worth while gravely to contradict the truth of this extraordinary dis covery. His Lordship did not, however, en deavour, as it was reported would be the case, to overturn the amendment carried by the Arch bishop of CANTERBURY in Committee. Se veral minor amendments were threatened at future stages of the Bill, but none of much interest were carried last night. At the instance of the Duke of WELLINGTON, a clause was introduced requiring a declaration from the Members of the Commission of their belonging to the Esta blished Church—a meaningless amendment, which Government paid the Noble Duke the equivocal compliment of agreeing to. We presume that the Bill will be read a third time by a triumphant majority, if indeed after the division of last night the Tories think it discreet again to divide the House. The report of the Liverpool Select Committee on the corruption of the freemen, is most cre ditable to the Members of the Reformed Par liament. For three years, Mr. BENETT, the independent representative of South Wiltshire, has been making head against the old corrupt House of Commons, who stifled all real in quiry, and opposed every proposition of legisla tive remedy. Even in this, the first session of the Reformed Parliament, there was a minority opposed to " inquiry" and to the appointment of the Special Committee. To the honour of some Members of the Government, Mr. ELLICE, Lord DUNCANNON, and Mr. CHARLES WOOD, supported the cause of Reform by their votes in favour of the investigation ; while Mr. STANLEY and Lord PALNIERSTON opposed it ! The result must be as satisfactory to the former as humiliating to the latter; and we trust that the exposure of this foul heap of election corruption will shew to some Members of the " Liberal Administration" the expe diency of the principle of backing their friends and repulsing their political enemies. These are not times in which public men can afford to discount their political reputation, and we do not doubt that the Ministry and Lord JOHN RUSSELL—par excellence an election re former—will now support the disfranchisement of the corrupt portion of the constituency of the borough of Liverpool. Such a report, emanat ing from a Commons' Committee, partly com - posed of Tories, must be founded on undoubted and powerful proofs ; and when the evidence is printed, we shall dissect the whole subject of putrid corruption. The report states that there are now on the Liverpool register of voters eighteen hundred and eighty electors attainted with bribery in the year 1830 ! Are the future returns of Members to the British Legislature for the important commercial interests of Liver pool to be influenced by the continued electoral rights of these infamous voters—men who, like ESAU, would sell their country for a mess of porridge ? Will a Reformed House of Com mons sit in company with any two repre sentatives of such evil-doers ? Not only must the corrupt Freemen be disfranchised, but the whole system of statute law, affecting bribery and treating, must be revised and re•• formed. The fountain of this shameful common sewer of corruption is clearly the existence of a close corporation and local nuisance which push into civil power men least entitled to possess it, • and exclude from the administration of the 46g 13 public trust funds every independent minded I and intelligent inhabitant,whose force and purity of character the close corporators know will in terfere with their schemes. Can it be believed that the electors of Liverpool are unable to find public men among themselves able and willing to represent them, and with a superior know ledge of their vast trading commercial and political interests than such a pseudo " Con servative" as Lord SANDON ? Can the borough, which, under its present imperfect constituency, once returned a ROSCOE, and in 1831 rejected a GASCOIGNE, be ade quately or independently represented by a young University Nobleman like Lord SAN - DON, whose practical knowledge of business must be as limited as his political opinions are " wavering?" But the Liverpool Corporation and the local election Oligarchy, who have hitherto ' reigned dominant, must now see signs of the early destruction of their political monopoly. Mr. BENETT last night gave notice of a " Bill to prevent bribery, and other corrupt practices in the elections of representatives to serve in Parliament, and in the elections of Mayors and all other municipal officers, for the borough and town of Liverpool, by disfranchising the Bur gesses, and by adopting such other measures as may be deemed necessary." Next session this Bill must become law ; and though the Liverpool corporators and Conservatives may put their trust in Tory Peers, we may assure them that they will be deceived, and that the Bills for extirpating the corruption of Warwick, Hert ford, Carrickfergus, and Liverpool, and for utterly blotting out Stafford, will pass the ordeal of the House of Lords. The Commons have now the power of insuring the freedom and purity of election, whatever may be the present opposition of the other branch of the Legisla ture. The Liverpool Report will he hereafter ranked as second only, in its integrity, to that of Warwick. The liberty of the Press was last night vindi cated in a proud and constitutional spirit by the House of Commons o❑ Mr. O'CONNELL ' S mo tion to bring the printer and proprietors of the Times to the bar of the House. That motion was met by an amendment to discharge the order which was carried by a majority of more than three to one-153 being against Mr. O'CoNNELL's motion, and only 48—barely the number of his tail, in its favour. After this manifestation of public feeling, one would sup pose that Mr. O'CoNNELL would have quietly submitted to the decision of the House, but the Champion of Ireland's wrongs was made of sterner stuff, and proved by his subsequent conduct, in happy unison with his previous proceedings, that even though vanquished he could argue still—and accordingly he availed himself of his privilege to have the gallery cleared for the remainder of the evening. But the game is not to end here, for Mr. ROBINSON, the Member for Worcester, gave notice that he would this evening move the suspension of the standing order which en ables any Member, on noticing that there are strangers in the house, to clear the gallery not only of strangers, but of the Re porters also. The result of this motion will, we trust, settle the question in future, in the only way in which it ought to be settled —open ing the gallery to the public, who have the greatest interest in the proceedings of the House. The speeches of Mr. METHUEN, Mr. Ro- BINSON, Sir ROBERT INGLIS, Mr. HARVEY, Sir ROBERT PEEL, and others, are so interest- ing, and so honourable to their candour anti public spirit, that we shall not enlarge upon their merits here, but simply refer our readers to the report itself. It appears by the report of the Parliamentary proceedings, this morning, that Mr. O'CoN NELL had some intention of clearing the gallery again ; but, upon second thoughts, he aban doned his exclusive rights. Should the Learned Gentleman succeed in carrying the repeal of the Union,what will become of the freedom of debate in the Emerald Isle ? As for the Reporters— why, they would dwindle away like the Kil kenny Cats, leaving the " Liberator" and his tail all alone in their glory Accounts from Warsaw speak of another Russian manifesto or declaration having been issued, in which the Emperor, after duly expa tiating, as usual, on the amazing forbearance he has exhibited towards the Poles, both before and since the revolution—how, throughout his proceedings, he has tempered justice with mercy, and resisted all the suggestions of re venge,—after a preliminary, methodistical flou rish of this sort, the Imperial Manifesto goes on to summons some 200 and odd malefactors to the bar of the Supreme Court at Warsaw, on pain of confiscation of their estates, and being put without the pale of the law. The whole edict is a disgusting compound of meanness, mendacity, treachery, and downright unblushing hypocrisy. From this we infer that it is the express production of time CZAR himself —an emanation of his own bright intellect, and justifying in every sentence CoNyPER's apt re. mark that " Seldom, alas! the power of wisdom reigns With much sufficiency in royal brains." DEATH of WILLIAM WILBERFORCE, Esq It is this day our melancholy duty to announce the death of William Wilberforce, a name with which there is probably associated more of love and veneration than ever fell to the IA of any single individual throughout the civi lized globe. At one period the sad event would have been felt as a grievous national calamity, and even now the tidings of his departure will be heard with the deepest sorrow through every part of the empire. But he worked while it was called day, remembering that the night was coming wherein no man may work. And he was not permitted to leave the scene of his labours till he beheld the great cause to which he hail dedicated all the energies of his soul triumphant, and the fetters of the negro about to be struck off fur ever. His warfare is accomplished ; his course is finished ;he kept the faith. Those who regard him merely as a philanthropist, in the worldly sense of that abused term, know but little of his character. His phi lanthropy took its origin in love to God ; it was kindled at the sacred fire of divine love, and it burned with such bright and steady lustre, only because it was daily reple nished from its hallowed source. The sad event took place last night at the house of Mr. Smith, in Cadogan-place. Mr. Wilberforce was in the 74th year of his age. We Must reserve all particulars for our next. We understand Mr. Wilberforce has directed in his will that his funeral should be conducted without the smallest pomp, and that his body should be interred in the family vault of his brother-in•law in the churchyard of Stoke Newington, pursuant to a promise made to the late Mr. Stephen. —Record of ye-terday. Either Lord GLENGALL or the reporters hive fallen into an amusing error in stating that " Lord KENYON, Lord WY NFORD, an I Lord ELDoN, the three great law Lards, were opposed to Mr. ButwEß's Dramatic Bill." There was a Lord KENYON who was a great law Lord, but talents are not hereditary. The defeat of Ministers in the House of Lords on Thursday night is said to have been purely se cidentil, Lords Ar.va.m.y, BELHAVEN, and one more, having come down to the House a few minutes too late for the division. These three ivotes would have given a majority of one to Ministers. NI PERLA LPARLIAM ENT THIS DAY, TUESDAY, JULY 30. HOUSE OF COMMONS. The gallery was this morning opened at about the usual time, and no objection was made to the presence of strangers. There were about sixty Members in the House on our enter. ing the gallery, among whom the Hon. and Learned Member for Dublin appeared soon after the business of the day had commenced. The House went immediately into Committee on the Slavery Abolition Bill. Mr. STANLEY moved the reading of the 25th clause. The CHAIRMAN said the question was as to the inser tion of the sum of twenty millions in the blank left for the purpose of having the amount determined by the House. Sir EARDLEY WILMOT said that he was not actuated by any party feelings in the view he took of this question ; but he was decided in his determination to move an amendment in accordance with the notice he had given. He should oppose the grant of twenty millions on two grounds, the first that the covenant entered into for the immediate abolition of slavery had not been kept; and the second was that the additional five millions proposed to be given to purchase the concurrence of the West India interests, could not be asked for on that ground, as their concurrence had not been obtained. He could not, with respect to the first of these objections, admit the argu ment of the Hon. and Learned Member for Dublin, who, at the commencement of the debate on that subject, had said that he was for " a conditional liberty, and if the slaves would not work, let them perish." Such an observation might be very well if applied to England ; it might do very well for a man pos sessed of such strength of mind as well as of body, as the Hon. and Learned Member, but it was inapplicable to the condition of a slave, who, it should be remembered, was called upon by 7 years' labour to attain that to which he was indisputably enti tled before the term commenced. There was no parity in the two cases. In this country an apprenticeship might lead, as it often had led, to the highest office of civic honour—to the Lord Mayor's chair—or even to a seat in that Hon. House. — (Hear, hear.) On his second objection lie should say, without fear of contradiction, that the West India interest was con clusively against giving their concurrence to the measure. He believed he might say that two-thirds were against it, and if that were true, it proved that the consent of that interest had not been obtained. He thought, however, there was a third party whose interests had been neglected, and that was the people of England.—(Hear.) He did not wish to paint the distresses in this country in unnecessary high colours, but he knew that great distress did prevail. Within a very few miles of his residence, there were many thousand persons (he al luded to the ribbon weavers) who, when they got up in the morning, knew not where they would lie down at night. In one parish near Coventry there were three hundred families, consisting of one thousand persons, whose earnings did not average 21(1. per day. He therefore thought it but justice ti ask for one corner of the sympathy of the House for our own countrymen.—( Hear, hear.) It had been said by two Hon. Members that he had formed his opinions from having attended meetings upon this subject at Exeter Hall. He denied that he had been converted by any thing that had been said at those meetings; he had only attended one, and he did not think he should ever attend another—( A laugh)—and as for having formed an opinion from what he heard there, he had formed his opinion long before he ever went there. As to the arguments used by Mr. Stephen, he was of opinion that that gentleman was deranged.—(A laugh.) The Hon. Baronet concluded by moving his amendment. Mr. O'CONNELL, before he proceeded to address the House, wished to ask the Chairman (Mr. Bernal) a question upon a point of order of privilege, viz., whether he, the Chair man, possessed the same privilege as the Speaker in ordering the gallery to be cleared of the strangers.—( A laugh.) The Chairman (Mr. BERNAL) said if any Hon. Member chose to take notice that he saw strangers in the gallery, it would be his (the Chairman's) imperative duty to order the gallery to be cleared. Mr. O'CONNELL—" Oh, very well, Sir, but I do not in. tend to look that way at present."—(Loud laughter.) His object had been attained. The House would perhaps have been placed in a very unpleasant predicament as regarded its standing orders, but he would refrain as he had seen an avowal that if the " people" were suffered to re port, justice would be done. He would not advert to the scurrilous manner in which that avowal bad been made ; but if gentlemen were desirous of seeing an excellent specimen of scurrillity, he would recommend them to read the Times of this morning. He did not believe the promise in that avowal would be kept, because as designedly false reports had been given before, they would be given again. With regard to the motion before the House, he regretted to hear the Hon. Bart. use an expression against a gentleman who was not present to defend hitnself.—(Hear.) That gentleman, Mr. Stephen, had devoted many years of his life, gratuitously and honour. ably to achieve the triumph of negro emancipation ; he was to a certain extent an enthusiast, but it was in a good cause. He was a gentleman of great talent and most honest integrity, who had devoted his time to the progress and advancement of humanity, and to giving the negro slaves the benefit of Chris tian education. He (Mr. O'Connell) had heard Mr. Stephen's speech at the meeting in question, but it cer tainly did not make any great impression on his mind. He was sorry the Hon. Baronet had declared he would not at tend another of those Meetings, for, although he believed the Hon. Baronet was not of any great use—( A laugh)—he added to the respectability of the meeting. Sir E. WILMOT rose and said, in reference to Mr. Ste phen's speeches, he only meant his observation to apply to this particular subject. As to the Gentleman himself he (Sir E. Wilmot) did not know who or what he was. Mr. O'CONNELL would inform the Hon. Baronet that Mr. Stephen was the son of that great patriarch in the cause of emancipation the late Mr. Stephen, who was a Master in Chan cery, and who had zealous'y aided the cause of emancipation. He would now come to the question of the 9.0 millions. He did not know on what the question of the 20 millions was to rest. Could the people of England afford that sum ? They had sent their representatives to that House for the purpose of making reductions, and they had scarcely made one at present. The House had refused to diminish the malt tax—at least, it had recalled its vote on that subject.—(Hear, hear.) It had re. fused to abolish the assessed taxes—(Hear) — in short, it had refused to diminish the great burdens of the people. —(Hear.) And the ground on which it had refused to do so was, that the Government could not afford to do so. Why then, he would ask, were those burdens to be increased? How were they to be provided for before so large a sum as twenty millions was granted ? The people had a right to know how it was to be provided for. Was it to be laid upon the agri cultural interest ? It had been clearly shown they could not afford it. Was it upon the shipping interest? It was perhaps true that that interest was in a more flourishing condition than any other ; but he objected to any thing like monopoly, or the giving of a benefit to the West India interest by that monopoly. He should prefer that the burthens should be thrown on the general taxation of the country, than upon any particular interest; in his opinion such a system was too bad to continue it any where, but ex tremely so on any particular interest. If this 20 millions was to be paid, the people ought to get value for it. In the present instance he must confess that he could see no value or equivalent for it. The greater part of the representatives of the West India interest were against the proceedings.—(Cries of " No, no.") In support of which he had stated he would only refer to the pamphlets of Mr. Burge, and several other agents of the different colonies in the West Indies, all protest ing against the plan instead of co-operating with it. Up to the present moment there was not the slightest indication of removing the enforcement of labour from the slaves by the whip.—(Hear, hear.) No one had come forward to put an end to that abominable and cruel practice; the lash was still to continue—(Hear, hear, hear) —and therefore he would persist in contending that the people of this country had no value or equivalent given for their twenty millions. — (Hear.) It was true that in one clause the slaves were given the rights of freemen, but in others powers were given to the Colonial Legislature to take it som them —(Hear.) It was said that the West Indians would sustain great loss, and that profit would be taken frcin them which had been sanctioned by repeated Acts of Parliament. Now, he would take upon himself to deny that slavery was ever sanctioned by law in this country—(Hear, hear) —and what demonstrated that most clearly was, that whatever value had been given for a slave, the moment to be set on foot in that land where a remedy was to be found he was free.—(Hear.) He denied that anything would be lost, as it was in evidence before, both in aad out of that House, that there was not any set of human beings who had more desire to get money than the negroes. He challenged the Honourable Member who had spoken last to disprove that statement.— ( Hear, hear, hear.) In conclusion, the Honourable and Learned Gentleman, in the name of the people of England, protested against the grant of twenty millions, and stated that, in doing so ,he felt it to be his duty to vote against it. Mr. STANLEY was quite satisfied that there was no sacri fice the nation would not make at the national cost rather than sacrifice the national honour. Neither of the two Hon. Mem bers who had spoken on this subject had stated any ground whatever why fifteen millions should be preferred to twenty, which certainly the House had a right to expect.—( Hear.) He would pass over the observations of the Right Hon. Baronet upon the anti-slavery meeting, and the anti-slavery society, with which he had nothing to do, and he would pass over, on the other had, the remarks of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman, the Member for Dublin, on the West India legislature, only observing to the Hon. Gentlemen, both one and the other, that the mode of violent attack upon one party or upon the other, was not a mode the best calculated to bring parties together. The Hon. Baronet be lieved that he took as a ground for his opposition, and for substituting 15,000,0001. instead of 20,000,0004, that the engage ment entered into by the Government and the House had not been completed. He was sure the Hon. Gentleman uninten tionally misrepresented what the resolution passed by the House was ; for he said you pledged yourselves by the first resolution to the immediate and entire abolition of slavery throughout the British domi n i ons , an d that has not taken place. Now, with due thin—(He a r, hear.) What they had p led g ed respect to the Hon. Bart., he (Mr. Stanley) would tell him that they had pledged themselves t o no such themselves to, was that an immediate and effectua l mea sureg• should be taken for the entire abolition of slavery through out the colonies. The Right Hon. Baronet opposite, the Member for Tamworth, noticed at the time that very word " immediate," and stated it would be better to strike out the word " imme c e t e, because it might lead to an inference that it was wished to introduce the immediate abolition. He ob jected to the introduction of the word " immediate'" as being liable to a Misconstruction, as tending to immediate ellianci• pation. It was then understood that the word immediate re ferred to immediate measures—those immediate measures had been taken—the Bill had been introduced, and the Act of Par liament would, he trusted, in a very short time be passed, which should forthwith have the effect of producing, within a very short period, the entire abolition of slavery throughout the British dominions.—(Hear, hear.) But the Hon. Gentleman said they had not obtained that cordial co-operation which they had a right to expect from the Jamaica Legislature, and gave the names of two or three gentlemen who had entered their protest against the whole proceeding, and stated this as an example of what was to be expected from the whole of the colonists. Now he (Mr. Stanley) must express his sincere regret that those gentlemen—one the agent for Trinidad, and the others all representing the interest of the Island of Ja maica—had not felt it to be their duty to come for ward with their cordial co-operation, which he thought the interests of their clients greatly required—(Cheers)— rather than press upon the House and upon the country ob jections against the measure. The question for them to con sider was not whether, in all its details, this measure would be desirable in the colonies or not, but whether under the state in which this question existed, with the state of public opi nion here, it was not rather for their interest, and the interest of those whom they represented, to come forward and close with the British Parliament upon the terms which they were disposed to offer.—(Loud cries of " Hear, hear.") At the same time these gentlemen did not represent the whole of the West India population.—(Hear, hear.) They were very far from representing the whole of that body. He would even yet trust that these gentlemen, having had the opportunity of witnessing the proceedings of that House, and having had the opportunity of personally knowing what the difficulties of the Government had been in obtaining for them such terms as they thought just and equitable, would exert their influence when they proposed it for the purpose of en. forcing and encouraging an acquiescence in a measure which had now beeame absolutely necessary.—(Hear, hear, hear.) But if, unfortunately, a different course should be pursued, and he begged to say that such speeches as they had just heard from the Hon. and Learned Member opposite, might tend to produce the unfortunate result of stirring feelings of irritation and excitement, instead of calculating upon it with sound judgment and good policy—if they would still go forward and offer resistance to the feelings and determination of this country, why, then, to look at it in what was a secondary point of view—to look at it in the low question of pecuniary consi deration, Jamaica, at least, would forfeit the whole of the claim she might have to any portion of the twenty millions which was now proposed to be granted.—(Hear, hear.) The question then arose as to whether 37/. 10s. per head throughout the island was a fair calculation with regard to the value of slaves. He thought it was very difficult to give the exact amount of the value of every slave, but he had in his hand a list of actual sale! which had taken place of negroes, and some had been sold for debt, all exhibiting what the value of negroes had been between 1808 and 1827. During that period there had been sold 22,661 negroes, at an average of 711. 10s. currency, which was about 51/. sterling, and the greater part of that 22,000, had been sold under the disadvan tageous circumstances of being sold for debt. From 1808 to 1812 there had been sold 5,498 slaves, at an ave rage of 531. 10s. -- 1813 to 1817, 6,598, at an average of 53/. 10s. 1518 to 1822, 5,200, at an average of 58/. 1822 to 1827, 5,365, at an average of 38/. The House would see, therefore, there was a fall in the value of slaves to 38/., which was at the rate of 10s. a head more than the average Government had acted upon. The average in Trinidad, from 1825 to 1830, was 661. 15s. ; in Demerara, from 1821 to 1825, 93/. ; and in Barbadoes, from the two periods of from 1821 to 1825, and from 1825 to 1830, 38/. These were some of the calculations upon which the Government had gone. In assuming that the sum of twenty millions ought to be granted as compensation, they did not consider that in assuming the average value to be 37/. 10s., they had exceeded the actual value of the slaves. There was not one of the calculations of ten planters, eight planters, or six planters, that had been alluded to by the Hon. Baronet, but would more than give the amount of twenty millions. Then, again, since the House had acceded to the granting of twenty millions, which was done on a division, it had cut off five years from the term of the apprenticeship, and no man would say that that was not a great reduction of value to the planter. They had already sanctioned that 20 millions should be the sum, for, upon the division, the proposition then was, that it should be 15 millions. Now, having since that taken off' the five years, it was too much to expect that the House would cancel that vote without one single argument having been advanced to justify such a proceeding. The House would recollect the manner in which the Government had been attacked, and accused of breaking faith, for agreeing to the shortening of the apprenticeship—a thing to which they were driven by the force of public opinion —(Cheers.) It was a pro position to which no Ministry, who had any feeling of honour or consistency, could submit.—(Cheers.) His honour was pledged, and he felt it was his duty to give it all the opposition in his power. Mr. BUXTON, after passing a high eulogium on Mr. Stephens, proceeded to say that there was not one clause in the Bill, however curious it might appear, that he would sup port with more pleasure than the grant of twenty millions ; and if any degree of reproach attached to those who voted for it, he was prepared to take his share of it. The amount was far surpassing what he thought the actual value of the slaves was ; and if the Government were only to wait till next year, they might buy emancipation at a quarter of the present price ; but then in what state would the colonies be ? He supported the grant for this reason, if emancipation was not given, more than 20 millions would be spent in military preparations, and what was worse, it would be against men who were merely asserting their natural rights. He would much rather give double, or any amount to the planter, than have such a thing to happen. The Government was entitled to great praise for the measure, and he was sure they would be supported by the country. He was quite aware that the people were suffering great distress, but he very well knew they would suffer a little more hardship, rather than lose all the benefits of the Bill. If it was not passed, they would lose the colonies ; were they not cheap at the price of twentymillions ? It would put an end to that murderous system of depopulation which had been so long going on in the West Indies. It would extinguish slavery, and it was possible, in his opinion it was certain, to altogether extinguish the slave trade ; and also, it would go a very great way towards abolishing slavery in the world. For all those benefits would the people grudge such a sum ? The Government he was sure would receive the co-operation of the slaves them selves —they would repay their debt of gratitude by their in dustry and their peaceable conduct in their new situation. — (Cheers.) He said the body of delegates, though against him on the compensation clause,were a most excellent body of men, but if they were opposed to him he had one great name on his side; he could not name him now without feelings of emo tion—he meant Mr. Wilberforce—he bore a high testimony to the character of that Gentleman, and regretted that he had not lived to see the cause he had so long and so ably advocated carried into full execution. Mr. FRYER expressed his astonishment at the manner in which the question was met by the House. Scarce was the sound of fifteen millions out of the mouth of the Right Honourable Secretary, before he: came down with a pro position for twenty : and this he founded upon the value of slaves. But, was giving 20/. for 32/. 10s., paying the full value ?—(Hear, and laughter.) The planters would get the money, but would never execute the Bill; and the Bill (said the Right Hon. Member, striking vehemently on the table) is a dead robbery.—(Loud and continued laughter.) The people of England did not make the negroes slaves, and why call upon them to pay the money ?—(Hear.) The House would not dare to make such a Bill for Canada, nor dare to take away the legislative rights of that colony. The other ground on which he was determined to oppose this grant was, that the House had no right to mortgage the future industry and labour of the country. There was no pledge given that the sugar trade would be thrown open, and after all this compensation-money was granted, the West Indians might still charge the :people of this country at as extravagant a rate as they pleased. He would oppose the grant in toto. Mr. R. WASON opposed this grant as most enormous and extravagant; and entered into a variety of details, for the purpose of showing that, according to the calculations made by the planters themselves, this grant of 20,000,000/. would greatly exceed the entire value of their slaves and estates in the West Indies. Mr. D. W. HARVEY said, it was curious that after all that had taken place, they had not heard one word from the Noble Load, as to what source the 20,000,000/. was to come from, and by whom the interest of it was to be paid. That was not an unimportant consideration. He had, indeed, heard it stated, and he should be most glad to hear it confirmed, that inasmuch as emancipation was a Christian duty, it was in the contemplation of those to whom our interests in those mat. ters were confided, to raise it by a sale of a portion of the Church revenues of the country.—(Hear, and cheers.) That would be a most comfortable assurance, for then there would be an appropriate correspondence between the end to be ac complished, and the means by which it was to be gained. —(Hear.) But he was afraid that was a mere illusion. He remembered the eagerness and eloquence with which the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Stanley) appealed to the House to give its unanimous sanction to the resolutions, in order that they might be adopted, and sent off as a rich freight to the Colonies. But they did g 'not then foresee the dilemma into which they might be thrown when Mr. Peel's Bill was brought forward. Mr. Canning most eloquently implored the House to give that Bill its sanction, and the House was so beguiled by the reason ing in that speech that they decided upon a measure whose effect they had been deploring ever since. It was the same with the present measure—the House had been led away by their feelings, and by the feeling out of doors, to give this measure their sanction; but if when all the meet ings throughout the country for the abolition of slavery were held, it had been known that that great boon was to be purchased at a price of twenty millions, he could not imagine those petitions would have' found their way into that House. The House was now in a situation that it was scarcely possible for it to retrace its steps. lle was one who would not part with the 20 millions without a proper equivalent ; but the proposi tion before the House was, whether it should rescind resolu tions which it had previously passed—resolutions embodying certain concessions. In his opinion, the House was bound to adhere to them, unless it could be shown they were founded upon false calculations and embodied upon defective principles. Mr. ROBINSON wished to know from the Noble I 4 ord opposite (Althorp) in what manner he intended to pay the interest of the money, at the same time stating his con currence in the grant, observing that he had no doubt of justi fying his vote to his constituents ? Lord ALTHORP had before stated, that he would propose • M51 . - -'' ' - ‘4. 4. 4 „ , i:4 :.--... _ . ..... , ,A ;;; ~,,Z-'l_,> .\ VT., --,N. J .., , s 1 ~ rai,c , the ;linnet . by an al itti‘nial t iitt'ool . , Vllll_, W t .: , ',at he considered to ti,, the bast m 0.1,. , 1 - ' _Aiel :i - 4. /..• . . hat the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Ttob:itso , : ii i tl 6 - ,1 ~ h• that plan—he would rather have a prop x -At iie (lid not concur. 'rile!' the Hon. and Le' dl . Til t Dublin said that would produce and continue a monopolym that produce ; but he (Lord Althorp) could not see that ; there was no connexion between them. As he did not see that there were many gentlemen who were prepared to vote for the clause, he did not think it necessary to go furthi r into the question. Mr. O'CONNELL said, as he understoud the proposition, the NoWe Lord intended to raise the scale of taxation on other produce, so as to keep the advantage to the West India body. Was not that granting a monopoly ? Lord ALTHORP considered that at present our own col, tiles ought to have a preference. Mr. HERRIES said the Noble Loid, in answer to the va rious questions put to him, had merely stated that the ulti mate intention of the Government was to provide for the in terest of this debt by a tax on colonial produce, but he (Mr. H.) thought this clause required a great deal more explanation be fore the House could be justified in laying an additional burden of 20,000,000/. on the people. It was the most unusual grant he had ever heard of. Mr. STANLEY did not rise to dispute the propriety of the Hon. Gentleman's observations, but merely to remind him that the question before the House was whether the blank should be filled up with 15,000/ or 20,000/.—(Hear, hear.) Mr. HERRIES had not yet come to the passage relating to that subject, and, therefore, he considered he had been rather improperly interrupted.—(Hear, hear, and cries of" No, no.") It was not stated in what manner or how this sum of money was to be raised, but the Government were empowered to raise it in whatever way they pleased, without the controul or authority of Parliatnent.—(Hear, hear, hear.) On all occasions hitherto every perpetual debt incurred by a Minister had been subjected to the confirmation of Parlia. ment. He was sure the Noble Lord opposite would not think it impertinent in him, if he called upon him to give a more minute explanation of the grounds on which he had framed that clause in the way in which it now stood. (The House at this period manifested some impatience, and at the conclusion of a sentence, elicited loud cries of " Ques tion.") The Hon. Member censured the interruption, and went on to argue that a subject of so much importance ought not to be discussed in the absence of so many Members on the Committee business of the House. He was afraid that the House was not in a condition honestly and fairly to refuse the compensation ; but it was incumbent on the House to show I that it was done with reluctance. Lord ALTHORP—The Hon. Member had argued gene rally on the clause, instead of against the amount proposed to be inserted.—(Here, and loud cries of " time.") Mr. AGLIONBY could not permit the House to di. vide without stating his dissent from the sum proposed. The Hon. Member continued to argue against the amount cf compensation, amid the continued interruptions of the House, and at length sat down. The CHAIRMAN then reported progress, an 3 asked leave to sit again. _ _ lir. STANLEY expressed a hope that, in consideration of the importance of the subject, Hon. Members who had motions to make would permit the adjourned discussion on the Bill to take precedence. The House then adjourned. MINORITY Of 35 (Tellers included) who voted, on the 26th of July, for striking out of the East India Bill the 53d and 54th Clauses, which dispense with the Members of Council which the Governors of Bombay and Fort St. George now have to assist them in their Government. For retaining the Members of Council 35/ 115 in the Against it BO j House. Majority —4s ENGLAND. Wynn, Right Hon C. W. W.— Aglionby, H. A.—Cockermouth Montgomeryshire Attwood, Thos.—Birmingham Briggs, R.—Halifax Brotherton, J.—Salford Dawson, A. E.—South Leices tershire Dare, It. W. H.—South Essex Evans, Col.—Westminster F inch, G.—Stamford Hope, H. T.—Gloucester Flume, Joseph—Middlesex Halcomb, J.—Dover Henniker, Lord—East Suffolk Lister, E. Cunli ffe —Bradford Lowther, Col.—Westmoreland Lyall, G.—London Palmer, R—Berkshire Pease, Joseph—South Durham Todd, J. Ruddell—Honiton Vvvyan, Sir It. R.—Bristol Wason, It.—lpswich Wilks, J.—Boston SCOTLAND. Agnew, Sir A.—Wigtolishire Gilkin, W. D.—Falkirk Sinclair, G.—Caithness-shire Wemyss, J.—Fifeshire IRELAND. Blake, Martin—Galway Finn, W. F.—Kilkenny O'Connell, Morgan—Meath Perceval, Colonel—Co. Sligo Ruthven, E.—Kildare Co. Sheil, ft. L.—Tipperary Vigors, N. A.—Carlow TELLERS, 'lnglis, Sir R. H.—Oxford Uni versity Ferguson, R.—Dysart, &c. MINORITY Of 8 (and two Tellers) who, on the 26th of July, voted against inserting at the end of the 99th Clause—" Pro. vided always that nothing herein contained shall he so construed as to prevent the Governor General in Coun cil from granting, from time to time, with the sanction of the Court cf Directors, to any sect, persuasion, or community of Christians, not being of the Un ted Church of England and Ireland, or of the Church of Scotland, such sums of money as may be expedient for the purpose of instruction, or for the maintenance of places of wor ship." For the Clause Against it Majority —74 ENGLAND. SCOTLAND. Buller, C.—Liskeard Bruce, C. L. C —lnverness, &c. Finch, G.—Stamford Sinclair, G.—Caithness-shire Forster, C. S.—Walsall Lowther, Col.—Westmoreland TELLERS. Plumptre,J. P.—East Kent Inglis, Sir R. H.—Oxford Ifni- Wynn, Right Hon. C. W. W.— versity Nlontgomeryshire Johnston, A.—St. Andrews P.S.—The Commitee had j reviously provided an E tt blishment for the Churches of England and Scotland, ..xceetling 100,0001. yearly, and the att mpt was to with hold power from the Governor-General to assist any other religious sect or persuasion. MINORITY 0i . 24 (Tellers included) who, at two in the morning f the 27th July, voted for the Motion of Mi. C. WYNN, that it should not be obligatory to send any more stu dents to I-laylebiny Col!e,e. For the Amendment Against it Majority ENGLAND. Aglionby, H. A.—Cockerrnouth Briggs, R.—Halifax Brocklehurst, J.—Macclesfield Brotherton, Joseph—Salford Buller, Charles—Liskeard Dykes, F. L. B.—Cockermouth Holcomb, John—Dover Lister, E. Cunliffe—Bradford Lowther, Col.—Westmoreland Lyall, G.—l ondon Marjoribanks, S.—Hythe Pease, Joseh—South Durham Walter, John—Berke Wason, Rigby—lpswich 9A VO in the 46 House. 'Young, G. F.—Tynemouth SCOTLAND. Fergusson, R. C ... _ bright Murray, J. A.—Leith, &c. IRELAND. Blake, M.—Galway Finn, W. F —Kilkenny Ruthvcn, Ed.—Kildare TELLERS. Wynn, Right Hon. C.—Mont.. gomeryshire Hume, J.—Middlesex MINORITY 01 4S, against Mr. MaTituates Motion to rescind the Order of the Day for the attendance of Mr. Lawson at the bar, on M mday, July 29. ENGLAND Attwood,T.—Birmingham Blake, Sir F.—Berwick Buckingham, J. S.—Sheffield Chapman, A.—Whitby Clay, W.—Tower Hamlets Cornish, James—Totness Faithful, George—Brighton Fancourt, Major—Barnstaple Halcom J —Dover Handley, Benjamin--Boston Harvey, D. W.—Colchester Hawkins, J. H.—Newport Hudson, T.—Evesham Hume, J.—Middlesex Humphery, J.—Southwark Jephson, 1). o.—Mallow Nlarsland. T.—Stockport Martin, john—Tewkesbury Parrott, Jasper—Totness Pinney, W.—Lyme Regis Richards, J.—Knaresborough Hominy, J.—Bridport Romilly, E.—Ludlow Roebuck, .1. A.—Bath Seale, J. H.—Dartmouth ,Stormont, Lord—Norwich Warburton, H.—lhidrnt Wilbraham,G.—South Cheshire SCOTLAND. Callender, J. 11.—A rgylesllire Maxwell, J.—Lanarkshire Oswald, J. Glasgow Oswald, R. A.—Ayrshlre Wallace, Robert—Greenock IRELAND. Barron, Pierce—WaterfordCity Blake, M J.--Galway Co. Copeland, Alderman Daly, James—Galway Co. Finn, W. F.—Kilkenny Co. IFitagerald, Thos —Louth Co. Ffreneh, F.—Rosseommon O'Connell, Maurice-I'ralee O'Connell, John—Youghall O'Dwyer, A. C,—Drogheda Ruthven, E. S.—Dublin Ruthven, Edward—Kildare Sullivan, R.--Kilkenny Vigors, N. A.—Carlow Young, J.—Cavan The names of Lord 1-lotham, Lord Duncannon,Sir John Camp bell, and Mr. Bannerman, are erroneously inserted in the Ls, o the Majority against the Triennial Bill; the latter gentleman paired off in favour of the motion. The name of the Marquis of Cholmoncieley was erroneously in serted in the list of the Majority on the Archbishop of Canter bury's Amendment to tho Irish Temporalities Bil'. lie paired off with the Earl of Tankerville. TO THE EDITOR OF THE SUP. SlR,—Nrmit me to explain the circumstance of my naote appearing in the list of the majority against Mr. Tennyson's motion for the R-peal of the Septennial Act. I spoke in favour of the motion, but was by accident shut in at the division, and the forms of the House cinp.l'ed me, notwithstanding tay remonstrances, to be counted in the majority.—l am, Sir, your obedient servant, July 29. D. L. EVANS. THE MARKETS.-(THIS DAY). HAY M A RKETS.--( At per Load of 36 Trusses.) CU 5111ERLAN1). Best Meadow Hay from 4s. to ss. per load lower than last quoted; prices otherwise stationary. Supply rather limited, and ra le dull. oarse heavy Lowland Meadow Hay .co 5 10 to X I 15 0 few Nleadow Hay 8 10 4 0 •Iseful Old Ditto 4 0 4 4 Flue Upland Meadow and Rye-Brass Hay :lover Hay....................... .. . ..................... 1 10 1 13 )at Straw X 1 Bto A:1 1101 Wheat straw ... SMITHFIELD. . c6:;j4).:43riseusivv.teiSrlopfeatuil:lelit:.olvid.:w:ier‘tm:itioloi:wayde.;i.ra.wat:::::e.a).4,.i.,:v..i.t.ex.r:itas.:(l.iy.o7l:s:dvvg..u..Hrila.lGl:as,::::an.tie.:::ta;pr.iar.:ywc..e...s.....,..s.l a :33:41 t: o llos i i l a L r o y . £ 11 115104535