The Sun. — London, England, 1830-12-11 00:00:00

these sets, and I therefore put it . to the Noble Earl whe ther he is ready to give me seettrity•,--auch security as may approved by two Masters in Chancery—and enter into recognixances that hr will go in the same ship with me, anal undertake to debate every thing that occurs tin the voyage, or that does not occur on the voyage, hut may happen to suggest itself to the Noble Earl—whether the Noble Earl will thee debate, and whetheronoreover, he will carry on that debate in that feeble voice of which be COM-. plained last night.—(Loud and general laughter, and cries of No, no," from Earl Stanhope.)--I beg the Noble Ear l's pardon ; he certainly said last night, that '• be raised his feeble voice, And wished to express forcibly ;" such were the Noble Earl's epithets; it is not for me to say whether the Noble Earl, in his speech attended to that definition which an eminent critic has given of &tie writing, and which the Noble Earl will probably see, is equally appli• cable to fine speaking,--namely, " apt words in apt places :" it is not for me, my Lords, to say whether the Noble Earl attended to this definition, or whether be put the epithets in the wrong places, fixing " feeble" where " forcible" ought to have been, and " forcible" where " feeble" would have been more appropriate—(Much laughter)—it is not, I say, my Lords, for me to pronounce on this matter, but such were moat assuredly the epithets of the Noble Earl ; and as he has been so hypercritical upon one of my epithets, he cannot surely complain of my turning critic in my turn upon his..-.(Cheers, and laughter.)—Well, then, my Lords, as I was saying,—will the Noble Earl give nee goes( and sufficient security that he will embark himself in the same ship with myself,--I will not insist upon his fixing his birth in the same cabin .—(Laughter)—that he will speak during the voyage such speeches as he speaks here, with the same iteration, in the same feeble time, and with the same agreeable ab sence of reasoning and argument.—(Much laughter.)— Will the Noble Earl, I say, seeure to me well and suffi ciently, and legally, these advantages,—all these advan tages, for I will not abate none of them.—(Laughter.)—lf the Noble Lord will, and will inform me also who the others are who are to go with us—how we are to vnyage,and what we are to do when we reach the end of our voyage, --then, and not till then, for then only thug I he in pot session of all the circumstances of the case,—then, I say I will, like a good and just judge, decide whether I will go or stay.—((sheers and much laughter.)-1 amsure your LuCdships will see that I should ill become the high judi cial office which 1 fill, if I were to give judgment in such La u ra the Noble Earl has satisfied me on these points, for until then I shall not have learned all the facts of the matter before me, and, without being informed of these, it is quite impossible that I can give a sound and sa tiafartory decision.—(Cheers and laughter.) Here the conversation dropped.—Adjourned till Monday. HOUSE OF COMMONS, Dec. 10. Mr. Danvers presented an account of the bUltil Of money paid to the creditors of the Nabob of Arcot. .BOROUGHBRIDGE ELECTION. Lord W. POWLETT brought up the report of the Committee an this election, whieh declared that the Sit, tiug Meinhelm were duly elected, but that the petition spinet the remelt was neither frivolous nor vexatious. Air. C. RUSSELL presented a petition from Reading, Berke, praying for the establishment of Local Courts. . Petitions against Negro slavery were presented by dif ferent Members from various places in England and Ireland. A Member took the oaths and his seat. Colonel Si RTUORPE presented a petition from Lincoln, in favour of the establishment of Local Courts, and another petition u n the sante place, praying for the abolition of the Assessed Tara, lie entirely concurred in the prayer of both petitions. Sir W. INGILBY prey rated a petition from Lincoln in favour of Parliamentary Reform, Vote by Ballot, awl an equal distrilaition of taxatioe. Mr. BEAUMONT presented a petition from North Webb, ' in Northumberland, ales praying f u r R e form a n d the it dint. Mr. BELL objected to the petition being considered as containing. the sentiments of the inhabitants of North Shields, but only of those who had signed it. The pati, Outlet's stated, that if Rehtrm were not granted to the people peseeably, they would obtain it by violence.. Now he denied that the people of North. Shields or Northum berland generally contemplated having recourse to violence. Mr. BEAUMONT explained that the petition did not assert that there wee any diaposition to violence in North timberland, hot they expressed an apprehoution that, ulti mately, the people of Englatedss4 Hear, beer)—might tee tent to force hi order to ohtalts die WM. lie would ask lie lio n e Friend (Mr. Bell) wars not the people of North Shield* friendly to Reform • , Mr. HODGES pteseotettpetitiotts from Wroeltesce eat! 41;iier places in Kent, praying. toe a change of the Tithe Syalittn, and fur itriigin in Parliament. Ile concurred in their prayer, Mid he. Mit! ied that if the OM Ministry re deemed their pledgee ott the subject of Rariprm anti Re trenchment, there would he comparatively little difficulty in putting an end to the outrages which haul unhappily sliegrared shot country. !lad the change taken place some ' months sooner, thoseoptrages never would fume occurred. --(IWO Many refused to be sworn in as special con st4WO'ishoring ilte-edistut Winces, avowing their distrust of the Alas otere. .Sir C. WETHERELL regretted that men should an far forget their duty to their country in a time of peril from such a cause. He hoped, however, that they would Pew come forwerd, 1114 they proliessed confidence in the new Adminietration. lie hoped, however, that the Hon, (*jeroboam would not neglect his duty, if his constiteents neglected theirs. Mr. HODGES hoped that the prevent Ministry would give satisfaction. But he considerett that the Magistrates. of Kent weie ptstieed in this backwerdness, by the neglect with which the late Government had treated a memorial laid before them by some of those Magistrates before the breaking out of the late outrages. Mr. HODUES then presented . similar petitions from Stapletno sr, Cranbrook, Peneedete and other places in Kent, which were all tardered to be printed. Mr. tkoeux Pottsoesir and another Member took the oaths. Mr. BEAUMONT presented a petition front the watersten of North and South Shields, praying for relief. They described themselves aa reduced to extreme distress by the introduction of steam-boats. Colonel SIIITHOUPE presented a petition from the Mayor, Corporation, Merchants, and other Inhabitants of Lincoln, in all 1272 meet respectable persons, praying fur the Repeal of the Asseseed Tezee. He regretted not to see the Chancellor of the Exchequer in his place, as be (Col. Sihtliorpe) was desirous of hearing the opinion of that Minister respecting the petition. Mr. ELLICE explained, that the Chancellor of the Eecheriurr was then attending a Cabinet Council. IRISH EDUCATION SOCIETY. O'CONNOR DON presented petitions from Meurer?, the Union of St. John, Sligo, Kilmecroney, and other places in Ireland,:complaining of the manner in which the grant to the Kildare-street Society fur Promoting Educe tion in Ireland was applied. Sir R. I3ATEBON defended the Society, and contra dieted the statements of the petitioners. Sir R. FERGUSON observed, that it had been agreed at the beginning of the Session that the time of the House should nut he eccupitd in the distmeeion of petitions, (Order.) Mr. O'CONNELL aupported the allegations of the po. tition. tie admitted that the Society was popular in the county which the Dom Baronet repiegented, herniae the religious edueation ettOreed by the Society was in confor mity with the opinious of the Pleabyteriant, who eonsti. lute a large part of the population of that County. lie wished the Presbyterians to educate their children in vebut ever tenets of religion they preferred. arl be only desired that the IMMO should he allowed to Catholic* and Prowl tants, Ile bad been a Member of the Kildare-street So ciety, but when he discovered the insincere and deceitful mode in which they wore proceeding, he withdrew. Nor was be alone, for the Puke, of Wrote, who was then President, Lord Mowery, and irony other', withdraw at the scants time, end for the same reseente. The higttest prelates of the Protestant Church in Irelatul disapproves! of the Society. A Committee of this lbw, who had rigidly etiunined the mode in which they profeseeti to can t:lite the people of Ireland, had recommended to Par liament to withdrew the grants end to edlitote the people in the manner for which he and the Catholic clergy had ineisted. • • Mr. I.EFROY defended the society. Sir JOHN NEWPORT said, that any observations upon the subject of tbe Kildare-street Society. would be best deferred until the grant caitiff formally under the eon sidsraiiou of the House. He objected as decidedly 411 soy .one could to the exclusive , system pursued; that sist i an which Shut Catholics from the benefit of instruction, toterely bersuse they would not read the nibk as a school hook without outs or enroineut....The petitions were ordsrog to lie on the table. Mr. tpCONNOII, presented it petition from the parimit of St. Ntellotas, Galway, preying for en eXte ,l4o 4o f thr Elective Franchise ; also a petition from the Freeholders of Roscommon, praying or a repeal of the Legislative Union.--Botli to lie on tt,e nt, M rgtuis of !It ANIV0111) presented s. petition front a'hutalred in the county or Norfolk, complaining use prevailing distress a tils cooritrY• Laid on the table. me sane DionLe 14 - 1141) presented a petition trout 4 010* ibe county of the town of .oa:way, preying for 411 g,_ tension a' the Elective Franchise. A petition from Long ford against Negrn Slavery, and one from Woodstock, praying for Parliamentary Reform.—All to lie on the t.He. Mr. O'CONNELL presented a petition from Moses Phillips, complaining that he was charged BiL in the pound upon a rent ni a farm in Paddington, which was only 2601. annually, and though the rate in question was charged far Police there were no Police stationed in that place.. The same Mx. Mx3tuza, presented a petition from a place in the parish of Saddleworth, in the county of York, praying for Radical Reform.—Both laid on the table. The House wee then summoned to the House of Peers ley the Deputy Usher of the Black Rod, to hear the Royal As-eiit given by Cotnmission to the Consolidated Fund Bill. On the SPEAKER'S return, he informed the House that they had been to the House of Peers, and heard the Royal Assent given by Coniroission to the above men tioned Bill. ... Mr. O'CONNELL presented petitions from the parish of Knockmoy. in the county of Galway, and from Youg hal against the Irish Unioo. Petitions against the Kil d,tre-place Sriciety, from Ki!glass, Bansgh.r, and Bally heen; and a petition from the occupiers of land in the Union of Middleton (Cork) against tithti.—Ml to lie on the table. Mr. O'CONNELL, took that oppottunity of giving notice that he would, on the 10th of February, make a motion, the object of which would be to effect a complete Radical and rffetual.Reform of abuses in Parliament. He likewise gave notice that in the Committee upon -the Mir. cellatteous Estimates lie would move, that the practice of 'Crown . Cauntel in Ireland of examining witnesses out of Court, was detrimental to the mule of justice and dero gatory to the character of the Irish Bar. Mr. O'GORMAN MAHON presented a petition front Richard Rochford Carew, of tae county of Cork, corm. plaining of a certain Act of Parliament under which Ma gistrates were enabled, unnecessarily, to commit, without the intervention of any other trilmnal, without appeal, and without admitting of hail ; thus the petitioner contended that the valusble privilege of Trial by Jury was impaired. —The petition was laid upon the table. The lion. Mem ber said that as the petition was horn an individual, he should not move that it be printed ; hut he gave notice that, on an early day, he should make a motion having 14 its object to remedy the abuses of which the petitioner complained. The same liorr. MssinEn presented petitions from KU fenora, awl another place in the county of Clam, complain ing of the system of the Kildare-place Society.—Both to re on the table. The hour having arrived at which the presentation of petitions terminates, Lord ALTHORP said, that understanding that an Heti.. and Learned Gentleman, who had been named on the Committee appointed list night, wished to be excused front serving, he begged to move that the name of Mr. Robert Gordon be substitUted for that of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman —Agreed to. BANK CHARTER. On the motion of Lord ALTHOHI', that the House resolve itself into a Committee of Supply, Sir HENRY PARNELL said be would take that op. portiinity of asking the Noble Lord what was the inten tion of Government as to the renewal of the Bank Char• ter, which tai uld shortly expire. He hoped a bargain would not he made with the Bank first, and then applica tion made to that House to take the subject into consi deration. It was a question that required the most se• riuue considerutiitu ; fur it was the duty of Parliament to pi event ttccurrAct s similar to those which had taken place, anti to protect the public from a repetition of loss like what they hut already sustained a sound and g.,od system of banking ought to be established. Lord ALTHORP calif it was intended to appoint a Committee respecting the r naval of the flank Charter. He did not know whether such a Committee would be ap pointed this Session or next, but he thought it might be this.—(Hear.)—With respect to any bargain with the Bank, he could assure the House that no such thing would ever take place. Every negociation should be submitted to Parliament.—(Hear.)—Gortornment had not as yet made up their minds on the subject, but he t . olt as much as any one the importance of the question. It nas Most essential that the banking system of the country should he placed on a firm and secure footing.— (Cheers,) EAST INDIA CHARTER. General GASCOYNE asked if it was intended to renew the Conimittee on the East India Comp iny's Charter? Lord ALIIIORP said, it would he more desirable that the Right Roo. the President of the Boatti of Controul should be in Ids place before the Comunittee was up pointed ; and as that would be before the House adjourned, lot thought it better not to say more at present on the subject. SALARIES OF PUBLIC OFFICERS. Mr. PHILLPOTTS(as we understood) said that in the constitution of the Committee appointed last night it had been expected that no one would have heel) appointed upon it who wee dire ctly tender the influence of the Govern ment ; and it woe, hp could not help observing, rather strange that two Members of the late Government should have been appointed upon it, fur they were placed in this situation—either they must decide that the salaries of their bete offices were not too much, or else convict themselves of having received inordinate sums for their services. It was also to be observed, that in the Committee there was not to be found the name of any one who, in the wow of ',the debate preceding the appointment, had expressed him self adverse to high salaries, while the mimes of those were introduced who advocated the existing salaries. There was one other point to which he should advert—it wart the omission of the name of an Hon. Alderman who had giver; a specific notice of a motion for the purpose of effecting a reductioo ip those very salaries which the lately appointed Committees wars to teke into consideration. Ile wished to ask the Noble Lord on bit left, and he did so with perfect cordiality, whether he intended to make any addition to the Committee? Lord ALTitoup NMI that it was important that some Member not only of the present but of the late Govern ment should be upon the Committee, for none but those potwesieg Ministerial influence could give thp expianition necessary .to x duo undershooting of the matters to be brought under consideration. Though he Not been opposed all his life to the flight Lion. Gentleman opposite, yet there ware no men in the House in whose honour and integrity he would repose more perfect confidence. If any blame were to atuseh any where, it ought to rest with the House i le df ; an d it wee phprefore that he sought to remedy the evils complained of by the appointment of a Committee. The Hon. Gentleman seemed to think that no one thould be on that Committee except those who had dechired fur the reduction of expenditure. There was one 4/ember on that Committee who had always been the uniform advocate of reduction of salaries—be inapt the Hon. Member for Dorsetshire. Before the debate came on, it would i t l ie , poasible for him to knew precisely who would take part in it either on owe aid« or the other—he bad, as be sent, pre. viuusly to the debate, taken muds pains in preparing the list of naines to he appointed upon the Cormnittee ; but h e should still not have the slightest ohjeadon to add the name which had Loan suggested—he had totally faegotten the Hon. Gentleman, es by ehould certainly have included his name. Ile was sure the noose would do him the justice to believe, that in naming thn Pommittee he had done so with an earnest desire to give satiafec.thin ; for it would he bao b ab to pnopinie such a Committee, unless with the view, and with the earnest 'and mincer° intention of giving satiefaction to the Hour seii4 the ccentry. Sir Cr. WAR/IF:PH/UR regretted that the jion. Mem ber Or Donittithire had tint been present that day, that they might have had the benefit , and advantage* of his set- vines as Chairmap. Sir 11, PEEL thought that the Committee had beets fairly constituted. Though eertain gentlemen had net been included wko ha.l taken it part in the diseueeion fa youtabje to reduction, yet tliet ought to lie no matter of surprise; Cur it was notorious that "lt...:eintnitteee of that na ture were alwaya arranged beforehand, anal of necessity home must be excluded who had; during the debate, e; ! - preesed a strong opinion in Woo of reduction. So far AS concerned the late Government, it .was a matter of peculiar &homy, and he therefore thougl4 that it would be better it' his Right Hon. Friend and he hail ant been named as Members of the Committee; for he confessed bits I thought it would be extremely difficult to determine what', salary a public officer ebould receive...wit they meant to re. duce :every thing, to the ioreest puled* same—without swab an inquiry into his private eircumeteanwee which would lie extremely painful. It would, he gonfeexed, be very satisfaatiu7 to him if his name could be omitted, to. l gether with that of Ids Hight lion. Friend ; for it might he suppoei that this feet of their having received those ealarice for so many years which it agil then. proposed to .recluee, nopid pot but lead many to suppose that their. Winds mot be biassed one way or the other, He therefore thought it would he totter if per Member of the late Admi— nistration were On the Cotendope. lie COltaeivett that it %yodel be much hotter diet they ehould give evidence before the Committee, ae witnesses, and speak to the fsote they beset', tether then sit as Judges in what might be called their own gales, if it was the pleasure of tins flouse that he should remtein ,hander of the Committee, he would ' Selina hinwelf to their itecigion with perket reedinesa. He eoneloded by reputing hi* opinion that the Committee had been fairly constituted. An Hon. Metens, whose name we 00 0 not loon, give full credit to the late Ministers for the purity of their intentions with reference to reduction. THE JEWS. Mr. FERGUSSON wished to learn from his Right Hon. Friend on his left whether he intended to bring for ward, in the course of the present Session, hie Bill for the relief of the Jews ? Mr. ROBERT GRANT said that on Monday he in tended to pre,ent a petition in favour of that relief, when 'he proposed to fix a very early day for•bringing forward his motion upon the subject mentioned, h) bring forward which, at come period of the Session, be stood pledged. PROCESSION OF THE TRADES. Mr. GROVE PRICE had a question of grave and con stitutional importance to put to the Noble Lord (Ahhorp), and he was sure that it would be fully appreciated by the House when he stated that it involved in it a violation of an Act of Parliament. The question which he wished to put was, whether the Government, of which the Noble Lord was a Member, hail been acquainted with the in tention of certain individuals to proceed in laree numbers. to present a petition to his Majesty?— (Laughter, and loud and continued coughing.)—Whether that Govern ment had given its deliberate sanction to such a ►tep, or, if not, whether it had, at least, given its tacit acquiescence? The first objection to such a proceeding was, that it was in direct violation of the Statute Law of the country; and yet they had hi and from a high quarter that it was not an illegal act. He would take the liberty of leading to them an extract from that Act of Parliament. A blemisee rose to order, and begged to put it to the Hon. Gentleman, whether in rising to put a question of a very simple nature—(Loud laughter, and cries of hear) — to his Majesty's Government, it would not he wiser to put the question at once without further detail? The SPEAKER thought that the Hon. Gentleman who was proposing the question way not out of order. Mr. GROVE PRICE thought so too.—(Great laugh ter. )—The clause to which be bud been referring when he was interrupted, was to the effect, that no per son or persons wire to repair to his Majesty, or to either or both Houses of Parliament, on the pretence of presenting any petition or remonstrance, accompanied by any number of persons above ten, under the penalty of fine and imprisonment. With this Act of Parliament on Ws side, it was no answer to him to say, that the procession hail paired off seHrout tumult, and with perfect order and propriety. The first dangerous example had been set—that of breaking the law; and be was arguing this question on the ground of principle alone. But, as if to mark the case still more strongly, this procession, which was gist up under the pretense of loyal devotion, and a desire to pay a mark of love and respect to the Sovereign, hail, among its banners, that symbol which was now the symbel of crime, insur rection, and rebellion in Europe—(A loud hear, hear, hear, in several parts of the House)--a banner under which mom crime (and he cared not for the cheers of gentlemen, for he appealed to history, which was more lasting than their cheers), more bloodshed, more tyranny, and more breach of the natural rights of man had been committed than under any symbol that had ever existed.—(Loud cries of " Question, question," amid which the Hon. Gentleman sat down.) • The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that the best answer which he could make to the- question of the lion. Gentleman was, by stating what were the circumstances that came to the knowledge of the Govern ment.. Within a day or two after his Noble Friend's tak ing office as Secretary of State for the Home Department, a Deputation from the City waited upon him, and stated that great disappointment had been felt by the trades at the royal visit having been postponed, and that in conse quence they wished to present a loyal address to his . Ma jesty. His Noble Friend in reply had said that of course there could be no objection to such a proCeeding. But it was net till the day previous to the presenting of the ad dreol that it came to his knowledge that a large assembly of persons was to accompany that address. As soon as this was learned, his Noble Friend consulted the proper police authorities, and they had been of opinion that any attempt to prevent the procession taking place then would only lie the means of producing a great riot, while on the other band they were sure that with proper precautions the assemblage would not give rise to any disturbance. Under these circumstances, his Noble Friend had thought that he was not justified in interfering...-(Loud cheers.) He (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) believed that the Hon. Gentleman was right in his law, and that according to the Act quoted an offence hail been committed ; hut though that was the case, it was naturally a question with the Government whether they ought in any individual in stance to proceed on the penalty; and he was sure that the most imprudent, rash, and ill-advised step any Government could hive pursued would have been to prosecute any part of the people of .England for acting in a manner that had entitled them to credit.---(Near, bear,)—.With re spect to the Act that had been quoted, he believed that the letter of it had frequently been broken; fur if be was right in his recollection, no Address from either University was presented with so few aS ten individuals accompany ing it.—(Hear, and a laugh.)--He admitted, then, that a breach of the law:had taken place, but he could not ad mit that it would have been right for Government to have interfered, and still less fur it (now that it was over) to prosecute any parties in consequence.—(Hear, hear.)— The lion. Gentleman bad also alluded to the different banners that bad been displayed, and had appealed to the tri.coloured flag as a disgrace to the procession; but he for one must say, that the tricoloured flag had a very different aspect now to what it had formerly..—(Cheers.) Nor could he think that it was a disgrace to any as em blematical of the recent events in France, by which that great country bad in the most noble and gallant manner defended her rights against the tyranny that had at tempted to subdue them.—(Great cheering. ).-This fact alone, then, should he no reason with the Government to induce it to prosecute any individuals; for this flag, be conceived, had not been carried in remembrance of colorer outrage*, but as an interesting memento to the country of the events that bad recently taken place.—(Cheers.) Mr. LONG WELLESLEY said that if the Govern ment had allowed this procession to take place without due inquiry, be should have said that they had acted with out due wisdom ; but after the explanation that the Noble Lord had affinded to the House, and the explanation which lie hail heard in another place, he thought t h at the (loverninent had acted with that wisdom and moderation which must add to the high sense that the country already entertained of their proceedings+. The lion. Gentleman hiel talked of the tri-coloured flag; but did he suppose that there was a gentleman in that House who did not hold in execration, as deeply as himself, the crimes that had formerly beta committed uniyr that symbol ? He, fur one, did most heattily ; but buying recently witnessed the change that hail taken place there, he would say that former crimes had been expiated by the valour recently displayed under it, and that the tricolour of France was no longer the sante f1ag....4 Hear, hear.)—He also begged to rerniod the Hon. Gentleman that when he spoke 'of the tii-coloured flag he spoke of the insignia of a monarch end monarchy which were acknowledged by our own sovereign, and with which he trusted we shou'd long con tinue to be on terms of amity and friendship.—(Cheers,) Sir ROBERT PEEL thought that it was right it should be understood that the law distinctly prohibited . tumultuous assemblies. Not only was this in accordance with the Jew, but with sound reason aloe. Though such assemblies might be quite consistent with a loyalty of feel= ing, yet they all knew that assemblies of thousands of per- sons might lead to disturbances contrary to the wishes of those who had assembled them ; its was the case in Lord G. Gordon's riots, when this Act was particularly insisted upon. It ought therefore to be understuod that this ease, I WI stilted by the Government, was au exception to the I general rule, for he was sure that it mum be the feeling of the House, that if a general practice of besieging the Ki ng I with crowds persona, on all occ,olions of petiti ons b e i ng I presented, was to preveile it would he attended with very untlirralant soil even miechievous consequentes.—.<Hear.) inwithstauding whet had been said by the Noble Lord apposite, it was with regret end surprise that he had heard of an exhibition of the kind taking place. Justbeforo hb bed quitted office, he had seen the depatation, awl t h e a , Wence be had received from those gentlemen had been at total vae;aeese with such an exhibition. Three persons had waited upon Mee, flud acquainted him that the trades of London hail been at great eepenee in preparing the, in.. tignie of their various callings, and thaet consequently, the pottponement of the Royal visit was a mouree of dig. eppnintment to them. lie was quite ready to admit ae the emblem of that this present national flag ef Pricaniocigs, of f r t o b f is an o y ou o o t t l r ie y : address, the national flag of country, was not to be considered crime--(Hear, hear,)—hut still he could not help re , gritting; that in approaching t h e as if our own national emblems) were not aufticiaet ler the purl:em cee . , iray lay other t eTru / t e n li a ielte a er l a used, kliear.) it was fur this reason he &preluded she i ntro d uction of the tri-coloured flag, as last year ha would ha ve dem ceted the introduction of the white flag on a like occasion. rill, however, trusted that th ere m i g h t 4 e a mistake on this point, end he was sure th at if any such wee exhibited, it must haste been centtery to th e w i s h es of thoe who hail organised the otelriblage, Mr. CALDWELL (as we understood) wait in Peeensati ~ I on the day in quest:en, and sow the Whole proesadoo pass.H e could not tell why, but there hail been an impreesion I in his mind while the procession Will p ass i ng , that he should see the tri-coleured flag among the banners ; but it , was not th e r e ; be could take upon himself to say that ; 4 there was no tn- coloured flag, and he should be ready even to depose fo that fact in a Court of Justice. Sir R. PEEL—Even supposing that the tri-colouree flag was introduced by some one into the procession, it was not fair to impute it to the getting up of the as semblage ; for in so great a body of people it was impos sible for them to answer for what was taking place in every part of the line. LordJOHN RUSSELL said, that as the Right Hon. Baronet appeared to admit that the Noble Secretary of State for the Home Department was not to blame in what had token place, he (Lord J. Russell) would agreee with him that it would be bad to draw such a cir cumstance into a precedent. Such crowds, however loyal in their sentiments, might be productive of mis chief if permitted to continue. At the same time it was worth remarking, that the petiion in question was of the most harmless description, being merely a, loyal Address, without any political object whatever ; and even though the tri-coloured flag might have been introduced, at all events it was not introduced in opposition to the flog; of this country.—(Hear, hear.) Sir ROBERT PEEL was certainly altogether against any prosecutions now taking place on the subject; and with respect to allowing it to take place, he was disposed to snake every allowance for the suddenness and shortness of the notice which the Noble Lord had received. Under these circumstances he was not prepared to condemn the determination of the Noble Lord, though he could not help regretting that an earlier notice had not been given him, as he was persuaded, that had that been the ease, he would not have permitted the procession to take place. Mr. G. LAMB said that no intimation had been given to the Noble Lord by the deputation that waited upon him, and the only notice he had had was one that was received at the Home Office by chance, on the day previous to the procession taking place. Considering the shortness of this notice, he thought that it would have been the height of madness to attempt to interfere.; and for his own part, lie thought that it was a subject for congratulation that all, this numerous train of persons had been gratified with ac companying their own Address to the Palace. With re spect to the law, that was always being violated, for ac cording to the Act of Parliament, no petition praying tor, change in church and state, could be presented to Parlia ment signed by more than twenty persons, unless coming from she Mayor and corporation, or other potentates of that description.—The subject then dropped. SUPPLY. The Order of the Day for the House to recolve itself into a Committee of Supply was then read, and the Speaker quitted the chair, The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved that a grant of 100,0001. be made to his Majesty, to satisfy the amount of pensions, &c., which would have been payable in case the demise of his late Majesty had not taken place before the sth of January, 1881. Mr. GOULIIURN although be should not oppose this postponement, could not help regretting that the opening of this first Session of the reign of William IV. had been so very different from all former precedents. In all former cases the Parlia►nent hail been desirous of making the Civil List the first act of the Session, as a mark of respect towards the Sovereign. He not only regretted this as a single instance, hut in the fear that it might be made use of in future reigns, and so keep at issue this question be tween the King and the people, which it was most for the interest of ull parties should be settled at once. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER agreed with the Right Hon. Gentleman, that it would have been more desirous for the Civil List to haVe been brought for ward at the commencement of the Session and settled ; but he was sure that the Right Hon. Gentleman must un derstand, that when an Administration had Just come into office, and had to inquire into the details of the Civil List, they could not pursue such a subject in Parliament imme diately without preparation. The consequence of their going directly into such a subject must have b , en their proposing everything on the responsibility of the former Government without knowing what the List contained, in which case they would neither have dune their duty to the public, nor hare made such an arrangement as could be satisfactory to his Majosty. The resolution was then agreed to. The CHANCELLOR of - the EXCHEQUER moved that a sum of 760,0001. be granted for the payment of the interest on Exchequer Bills for the year 1830.—Agreed to. The House then resumed, and the report was ordered to be received on Monday next. The Ways and Means' Committee was then, on the motion of Los d ALTHORP, postponed till Monday. His lordship gave notice that he should submit sonic proposi tions to the Committee on Monday, but we were unable to ascertain what. REGENCY LILL. The House then resolved itself into a Committee on the Regency Bill. On reading the first clause, Mr. CUTLAR FERGUSON objected to the wording of it, as excluding fiem the Throne all possible issue of the King by any marriage after the death of the present Queen in favour of the Princess Victoria. It was possible that her present Majesty might die, that the King might marry again, and have issue, and by the way this clause was worded, bestowing the Regency on the Duchess of Kent, in case his Majesty should die without issue by his present consort, it would postpone the claims of that issue to the right of the Prince*. Victoria. The Hon. and Learned Gentleman moved, as an amendment, to substitute, for the words " Leaving no issue by her present Majesty," the words "Leaving no issue now surviving." Sir ROBERT PEEL thought there was no necessity for the amendment. The Bill was intended only to apply to existing circumstances, Certainly it was possible that her Majesty might die, but before the King could com plete annther marriage he mitt come to Parliament. That would be time enough to provide for the case the lion. and Learned Gentleman supposed. The present Bill was only to remove doubts as to who eleruld exercise the Royal authority in one ease, and therefore the amendment was not necessary. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL admitted the force of the Hon, and Learned Gentletnan'sobservation. The Bill as it now stood was t restriction which he understood was not intended. The hest way of amending it, however, would be, to leave out the words " her present Majesty," making the enactment depend on his Majesty's dying without issue. Mr. O'CONNELL took the same view of the meaning of the clause as the Hon. and Learned Member (Mr. Cut ler Ferguson), but he thought the best way of amending it was that proposed by the Attorney-General. Mr. CUTLAR FERGUSON agreed to the suggestion of the Attorney-General. Sir ROBERT PEEL cautioned the House how they admitted the proposed alteration, for it woul►, alter the whole principle of the Bill. The very intention of the Bill was to provide fur the contingency of her present Ma jesty having no issue, and that alone. Mr. C. FERGUSON thought the other clauses might, without difficulty, he adapted to the proposed amendment. Lord ALTHORY saw the difficulty which had been pointed out, but in general he agreed with the view taken of the Bill, and of the care required to alter it, by the Right Hon. Baronet. if it were necessary to alter the Bill, he shi►uld prefer the amendment suggested by his Hon. and Learned Friend, the Attorney-General ; but, at the same time, as the lilt was . of so much importance, he Loped his Hon: and Le►rned Friend would not press his amendment till the report was brought up. Mr. TENN YSON observed, that it was a most grave and serious matter, for the Bill might be a Bill of Exclu sion, and might regulate the succession. The Bill, how• ever, contemplated only one contingeucy, and to that it ought to he en:dined. Mr. O'CONNELL also again contended that the Bill, as it was worded, might be a Bill of Exclusion. . . bid 111. W. RIDLEY thought the perfection of the Bill war, that it was strictly limited to the particular case; and, sboold the ease supposed by the Hon, and Learned G ent l e i t u u t arrive, the King would have to come to Per. !lament to complete his marriage, and then the case sup.. posed might be provided for. Th e ATTORNEY-GENERAL defended his proposed ementlinent, and showed that ell the other clauses of the Bill might bti easily adapted to it. : Of course, however, he should deter to the wishes of his Noble Friend, and post pone hie amendment till the bringing up of the report. Sir ROBERT PEEL entered his protest against lotto &icing words into the Bill which would imply that any [Oren Consort might he Regent. _ Aft e r some further conversation, the first clause, as we wi d ere mod, was postponed ; Peverel of the fullowing d ome were agreed to without amendment, On t h e suggestion of Mr. O'Cuttraht., the words no man Catholic were hubstitutod for the word Papist in the clause where it was necessarily introduced. The other clauses were then agreed to without amendmeuts, and, the HOUIO having resumed, the report was ordered to be re ceived on Monday next. M r . if, UPOUES gave notice of his intention to move on Monday next for leave to :,, t w i ns ~ n .0 a Rol to alter and ame nd the laws with respect to party walls, and to make other provisions against the consequences of fire* in Qn the p;otin;t of trdil° Te n into exii further conh the ereport of the Validity i 7 rf:;attilireitsla4n:ltl'aorne dill was t verbal amendments being introduced, t h e report was tweed to, and the Bill ordered to he read a third time on Monday next. The Setleortent of the Poor Bill also passed through a Committee, after some conversation between Mr. WET LAND, Sir E. SUGMIN, Colonel Woon, and Mr. WIT, LESI.NY. The Fecond reading of the Labouring Poor 13111 was postponed until Monday next. THE LIVING OF STANHOPE. Mr. PHILLPOTTS withdrew his motion for the pro duction of the communications which have passed between the Bishop of Exeter and the Secretary of State relative to the living of Stanhope, in consequence, he observed (as we understood), of some circumstances which would probably render it unnecessary for him to trouble the Hotre on the subject. CHURCH LIVINGS. Mr. WELLESLEY moved for a return of the total number of livings, whether Rectories, Vicarages, or Per petual Curacies, in the gift of the Crown, stating the amount of each living at the present moment, and the amount at which it is rated in the King's Book, and spe cifying whether the incumbent is resident or non-resident, and whether there is any house appropriated to the use of the holder of the living. The Hon. Gentleman had said he made this motion with no views of hostility to the Church, but, en the contrary, with a desire to promote her interests, which he conceived would be promoted by taking measures to procure the residence of every clergyman on the benefice to which he is attached. _ Mr. LEADER expressed a wish that the - motion ex tended to Ireland, where the interests of the Church were much in want of such support. Mr. WELLESLEY t;:irl he was anxious to render his inquiry so limited as to be enabled to effect something by way of example, and he understood .at the same time that the livings under the patronage of the Crown were not very numerous livings in Ireland. . Mr. FILER suggested the propriety of not confining the motion to the livings in the gift of the Crown. ' He thought it should extend to all livings in England. Mr. 'WELLESLEY was not disposed at the present time se adopt any count) which would have the effect of exciting prejudices against the Hierarchy. It was for that reason he had limited his return to the livings in the gift of the CroeA, and he repeated his wish to make it limited so. that he might hope to effect some good from the infor mation which he would receive. SLAVERY. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, having presented several petitions from Paisley and other places, praying the Abolition of Slavery, gave notice on the part of the Mem ber fur Weymouth (Mr. Buxton), of that gentleman's in tention to bring the subject of slavery under the con sideration of the How on the 15th of February next. The House then adjourned until to-morrow, at a Quarter to Niue. RYE. The following is an exact list of the Committee ap pointed to determine on the petition of appeal presented against the right of voting for the town of Rye, as re ported to the House of Commons in Alay last : WiLt.taat TnomrsoN, El. Chairman. The Hon. J. H. Craddock, Abel Smith, Esq. James Johnston, Esq._ Richard Jenkins, Esq. Gustavus Itochfort, Esq. Hon. W. Gordon, T. A.' Xemis, Esq. Marcus Beresfurd, Esq. W. H. Miller, Esq. Earl of Ossory. And the following is a list of the Members which formed the Committee in May The Right Hon. Lord PALMICRITON. Chairman. Thomas P. Williams, F.sq. Lewis William Buck, Esq. Right lion. J. W. Horton, Bethel Walrond, Esq. Sir T. D. Acland, Bart, Robert Downie, Esq. Charles Mackinnon Esq. The Hon. Henry King, T. G. Bramston, Fsq. Thomas Bilelit% Tyler, Esq. COMMISSION OF LUNACY. Yesterday a commission de lunatic() inquiretado was executed at the'hiermaidTavern„'Hackney, before Commissioners Messrs. PHICLIMORE, BLumr, and WINSLO'W, and a highly re spectable Jury, to determine whether Miss Jane Nanney was of unsound mind, and how long she had been so. The commission further directed inquiry to be made as to what real property she was possessed of, and whether she had alienated any part of it, and under what circumstances. The case as it proceeded excited the greatest interest, from the painful origin of the malady, and the singular manner in which Miss Nanney, after being lost to her friends for many years, was at last accidentally discovered. Mr. CAItRINGTON opened the case, by observing that he appeared for Mrs. Hartley, th e s i s t er of the alleged lunatic. Mrs. Hartley and the object of the present inquiry wero the only daughters of the Rev. Mr. Nanney, a gentleman of ancient family and very large property in South Wales, and who besides held the living of Golgelley, in Merionethshire. Miss Nanney was born in 1781. and received an education in every respectlbe. fitting a lady. During; the latter part of his life Mr. Nanney became Infirm in mind, and at that time a man named Matthews, a bankrupt tallow-chandler, was received by:him into his service and conhdence, and soon act mired a great ascendancy over him. This mem, in 1803, accomplished the seduction of Miss Nanney, and ever since that period his unfortunate victim had been in sane. She was removed to a distant part of Wales till her ac. couchement, and in the following year she accompanied her father and Matthews to London for the latter still retained his aseen. dancy over the Rev. Mr. Janney. In 1813 Mr. Nanney's son, a Captain in the Royal Navy, came home, and happening to meet Matthews while out shooting, he levelled his gun at, and shot him, but the wound did not prove mortal. Mr. Commissioner PHI LLIMORE objected to the introdue_ lion of these matters as irrelevant. Mr. CARRINGTON accordingly passed from the subject, and proceeded to observe, that Mrs. Hartley had lost sight of her sister ever since 1815 till about a year back, when she was dls. covered to be residing at No. 11, George -street London - fields, (The Learned Cou nse l then proceeded to detail the circumstances of her discovesy, and the proofs he professed giving of her insanity.) Mr. Griffith Jones examined—l reside in Bank.buildings, and am solicitor to Mr. and Mrs. Hartley. In ISI2B Mr. Hartley was high sheriff of Merionethshire; and, as I was then acting as his agent, ho directed me to endeavour to discover, if possible, the re sidenceof Miss Nanney. I madeevery inquir but could learn no thing of her; and It was not till September, ith, that I accidentally discovered her. At that time I was residing at Wilton, and on a Sunday afternoon took a walk in search of a friend's house; and entering George-street, I was looking about me, when I was accosted by a voice from a first-floor window. The words w ere , " How d'y do; how d'y' dor" uttered rapidly. On looking up I saw a person al an open window with a white hat on,'arai having more the appearance of an old gentleman than a lady, I replied, " I have not the pleasure of knowing you." The person answered rapidly,'" Not know me, not know me!" I thought from the manner it was an insane person, and walked away. Shortly after I again passed the house, when the voice called to me, " D on ' t you know me ?" I replied, " I do not." The person then turned I away, and called out, as if speaking to some person within the room, " Mrs. Nanney, Mrs. Nanney I" I had known Miss Nan. ney in her youth, and, upon hearing these words, I immediately recognized the person who had an strangely addressed me to be her. I knocked at the door, anti having made myself known, was invited to walk up stairs, where I saw Miss Nanney, and her mother.in-law, Mrs. Nanney,—(The witness proceeded to state the demeanour and conversation of the young lady, both of which showed a state of mental weakness approaching to childishness. tier memory appeared to be completely destroyed.)—ln coati. nuation, the witness said Miss Nanney is descended from one of the most ancient ancient and wealthy families in South Wales, and had received every accomplishment of a lady. I recollect, when a boy, hearing of her seduction, but I know nothing of it except from hearsay. No Counsel appeared on behalf of the lunatic, and Mr. Com missioner PHI LLIMORE, in consequence, questioned the wit. ness must minutely as to the gr o u n d if his belief in her insanity. Several pertinent questions were also put by the Jury; but the answers In every instance tended to strengthen the original evidence. Dr. Ramsbottom examined-4 am a physician, and on the 4th of October I saw Miss Nanney. I asked if she knew me, and she replied " Yes; your name is Bill Dennett." My name had been mentioned to her just before. I took hold of het hand gently, to feel her pulse, and s h e instantly jumped up and threw herself upon a sofa, In a reclining p osture, with her legs upon chair. I took hold of her wrist, and she instantly jumped up, and resumed her former seat, and called me, on my following her, a diabolical wretch. On my asking if she had seen Mr. Matthews lately, she said readily, " Oh, yes, I saw him yester day ; he came here to see me, a n d d ran k a great deal of wine. " I asked her abruptly if she had seen her son lately. She re plied, " Have I seen my son lately l'- what a question." said, " You have a son, have you not r" To which she an swered, " Have you a son P" I said," No," and she replied," Go and get one." Soon after she began to unfasten her clothes, and on my asking if she was going to undress before me, she said, " Yes / • and if you don't like to see tae , you may go out of the room.' From the whole of what I saw of her, I consider her of unsound mind. Mr, Kingdon, of Dank-buildings, City, surgeon, considered her to hoof unsound mind. Mrs. Viney examined—l reside nxt a ttitu de s, to Miss Nanney. She would throw herself into strange trample over the flower-beds, and pick up pebbles and put them in her bosom. All that I could ever make out from her muttering was, some thing about ti a dear baby that was in Heaven. Mr. Huxtable, surgeon, of Hackney, had attended Miss Nan. ney since Sunday last, in consequence of her having dislocated her wrist. He was of opinion, from what he saw of her, she was of unsound mind. (The dislocation of the wrist arose, we understood, from a fall she sustained in attempting to escape from the house on Sunday last.) At this stage of the proceedings It vim proposed to examine ;he alleged lunatic, who had been brotight to the_ place at alt early part or the day ill a earriAge,scoompallled Nanney and another lady. list last witness was deputtci to introduce her, and accordingly retired for that purpose, but returned some minutes afterwards, and stated that she was still in the carriage with the other ladies, and although fur some hours past they had been endeavouring to prevail on her to alight, she legalrefseti. This difficulty was at last got over by Miss !Janney be.. revailed upon to get out of the cartilage. On her being in. traduced into the room, she stared wildly round at the Jury. She was placed in'a chair, and questioned as follows by Mr. Commis. stoner l'H ILIA MORE : These gentlemen are the Jury of Middlesex, and have come to inquire how you ate, and about your property.. 4 know nothing about It. Where is your property le—The Lord. Chancellor knows all about it. "What, are , yeu a Ward in Chancery P—Yes ;it is all in Chan cery. leave it all to thp Lord Chungiler. We arc told yettr nallle )0 N . 4lwri?—Noi fur 1 havo been ow -" long have you been marrie4lP—That is to be inquired into. How many children have you P—l sha'n't tell you. Are they boys or girls P—l don't think any of them are boys. In what country are they now P—l can't tell, I leave It all to the Lord Chancellor. Who married you P—l am married; ask the Lord Chancellor. Do you know Matthews I , —They tell mehe is dead. In answer to further questions. ' she referred them to the Lord Chancellor, who she said, had the care of her property, and paid for every thing she required, and knew all about her. Mr. 40Nt 4 :4 stated that this was altogether a delusion, as she had tio property in Chiencery, Mrs. /*Tenney deposed that Miss Nanney bad resided with her constantly from September 2, 1824. Mr. Matthews used to act as her agent, and supplied witness with the requisite money for Miss Nanney 'e support, rill about a year back, when he died; and since then, witness herself had received her inmate. The Jury expressed themselves perfectly satisfied, and returned a verdict, finding that Miss Nanney had been of unsound mind ever since September, 1924. DREADFUL FIRE AT WARRINGTON. S (FROX A COAAPSYONDLIer.) I write this to inform you of a dreadful fire that oc curred here this evening (Thursday, Dec. 9). Mersey Mills, situate on the banks of the river Mersey, about half a mile from Warrington, were discovered on fire at about six o'clock, and at eight o'clock the whole of the building was destroyed, with the exception of the warehouse, which is saved. The mills are the property of Mr. Dunbell, who resides at Honley-house, adjoining the premixes. The gentleman who rents the mills is a Mr. Middlehurst, of Liverpool. 'there was a'greet quantity of flour, wheat. meal, &r. in the mills, the greater pert of which is con. •timed. The mills are the largest in the kingdom, twenty two pairs of stones being worked in them. I saw the manner, and inquired of him respecting the origin of the fire, but of this he had no idea. The mills are now burning. REFORM IN THE CHURCH. Reform has, at length, reached the threshhold, not to stop there, I trust, but to enter into every iastitution, and expel all that is useless and vicious. lam a Minister of the church of Engin:ill, a conscientious believer of her doctrines, au ardent admirer of her scriptural and almost ftultless liturgy ; yet reform is wanted even in it,--cur tailment of the public services, rather, perhaps, than alteration ; though some expressions in them might be Lords,plaee w h at asi e E h a ve itlene ou r beset B is w ho it p it s tet o mta omitted, or changed, with advantage. Bnt.it chiefl y in the e,tablshment of our church that reform l e necessary. firstln the themselves, ' detrimental to the interests of our church and faith ? If the constant residence of an in cumbent upon his living be considered as indispensable, much , more if that of a Bishop in his diocese : the whole time o f a parish priest ought to be devoted - to th e discharge of p i lo tio in ns t ' i t i o e of his duties, the ovel.sight of all parish pr iests, and 81 parishes, may well occupy every momen t of a lbshop's life not spent in necessary relaxation, is domestic engage ments, and the duties of hospitality. Again, as to t he income of the Bishops, surely no one will say that most of themare not votly too large, dangerously Ito to them selves, invidiously so to the laity, injuriously so to their humbler brethren in the Ministry. A Bishop, like every other man, should be paid according to the value andotent of his labours ; in other words, according to the size and business of his diocese ; none, perhaps, should hav e more than 5,0001. a-year, none less than 2,000/. But how thro w can any arrangement of this kind he e ff ected? B common ing the revenues of the different sees into fund, and then paying the Bishop s out of it, by the rule above mentioned,—the surplus to go towards building glebe-houses and augmenting the incomes of small living.. The revenues, too, arising from all prebendal stalls should be added to the general fund, and a pew moderately-paid an efficient Ministers be appointed to p erform the services of a cathedral. No doubt there are many obstacles, besides " the love of money" in those who fill these offices, t o the adoption of this, or any plan for a more equal distributimt of the revenues of the church. The AdYilOtagee Of however, ate obvious and important, vit., 1 15 ° 14 alwar at his post, 4 . wholly given" to the duties of Ids most.r.ei aponsible and arduous station—unties:Jed by *n il " honours--unoccupied by the engagements of a CoortT i ;: . distracted by the intrigues of Statestnen--oniontlenee Y polities and party. We should have resident Clergymen where there we now no glebe-haws' a, and many en Ul u " play and faithful Minister, now poverty-1466"f_ :: re warded in a proportion somewhat more equal to o labours and his deseits.—Correspondent of the Times. The conversations . in the Lords lost night • will be f'ound interesting in the beginning, and entertain in; at the close. in the Commons various tool`'' were discussed of various importance. The transparent ra"; dour and manly directness of the new CIIABCRLLOR 01 the ExcuII QUEO were manifest on more dianone ocessioo I and Sir ROBERT PEEL, by his fair and necessarilyow" merits, showed that an ex-Minister is.not 2 factious opponent. The topics themselves, as ti ei 1 0114 no result, need not be discussed any fin thee th an tbel w e re on the spot; but t he p rocess which the Cisanctv Loa of the EXCIIEQU IR announced as likely to he adopted and pursued by himself and his colleagues iii the r e newal of the Bank Ch arter deserves attention, and will also command appsobation. Par l i ament is to dew freely upon it, without being bound hy tbe lo fetteis of if previous engagement or undetstandingnt entered into tween Ministers and th e DirectorsTiea. L ANDLOR D'S BIGHT or sr GEORGX DUNLOP AND Co. V. VTR EARL. AtID Colitivri s or Datuoustx.:—We are happy to have it in our power to allay the alarm which might otherwdecisionhave w b hich the een es cited throughout Scotland, Ly the Loan CDANCIII.I.OA found himself c onstrained to crone to in this case . Upon the application ol Mr. /Ww ) Dulmor, Provost of liaddington, where the transaction occurred, upon the subject of this ease, his L0:14 1 4 14 ' st ones un d er taken to bring in a Bill to amend the I.ov i; eiis respect, and we have reason to believe that this NI will lie introduced by his Lordship even as early 0 All ) "' day next. An address has been published to the labour 'vty ors on the subject of destroying machinery) hi : cSu°1:01„o for the diffusion of useful knowledge, wh idi *l. ' The many h o m e -truths in a plain and energetic soaneer. ,n fully of such destruction is ably pointed out by the far g, unanswerable argument:--" Your clothes, your stocoouigisly your shirts, are all made by machine's, far more curl calico whieh contrived than the thrashing machine. The l j s elv makes your chins is woven by a intichioe, s'" , ' l ed by a g i r l ; but in consequence of the little labour ill u ~ to manage it, the shirt which formerly coat seven shilling' now costa only eighteen pence. on, yea Extract of a letter from Paris :--" e Y a late here a good story about the Princess Lisysa_art, Prince TALLIYRAND. ' Well, Prince, how is y , 0, 0 L 0 . volution going on ?' said she to the gr.at man. i t l, lotion ! Restoration, you wean, Madan : you knowil!..l just what the Emperor ALEXANDER pitons.'wi 'Ol ' l l .; ir we have happily accomplished his inte The., to diplomatist bit her lips, and rem:lined silent, prothlTek„ Iherself to choose a better ground another time of It'', , in Prince TALLEYRAND, The Duchesa ne Dill?. t o e , turns to London in a few day.. 1 ean hardly 0 143 t y, story about a treaty having been concluded litweeo , two countries." n d pro' 1 vincial Papers which snivel! yesterday, contaiti.,_e,°o. hare t We regret to state that the letters a po p of several new firm Amongst them vie notice me t. )40 , doe ... of several ricks belonging ta Mr. P taCtl r s 1 : oto ble bulls near WineLcomb. The wind being hi ' M i ps . 01 ' ga e rter, much of the property was preserves'. . i b „tia fire, labourer bu ex,rted themselves to ..s t ' i „ eitil TOO others looked on with inslinele'aobridge: .. re, been .o fires at three or four Pileelgoisral ete xki ' 7 e w u.i ta, b t they were not extensive. -e, , „ n i se o .0 b have aho been burnt at button Lincolnshire; and st.Dumbleton in Glonreetecon;o de„ out-buildings belonging to a ;fr. NO P / A li° Ye bre° boteoYed. In all these casts large rewaeu g b „ S e uist has' fared for the discovery of the offenders 1 ) 14 ._... 1) " 0 heed' set hoen obtained. The tranquillity'of gent .... 0 of 0 disturbed during the week, with the exceptitul. ~,a ultur el firing of a Purse-stack , near Boughton. The isr -e d the a_ib d emblages Lave all ceased, chiefly in orour e q ueeet , 'sled I D t f h ri e ners having discontinued the machinea, etol yr ,. demands of the labourers in int: • g tb ilie sysg Win A- APhfl' (ADVERTISEMENT.)—TDE U --Y /ibis xiwraseriox.—We understand the Court Journal?) iv Day, No. 95, will contain, beside, touch escluovaolicy 1. " illation of Various kinds, an article on the fusel[: P ea . of the GREY Administration, and a soene t'ell-pro• Prime Minister of the Lust age and a great °°r.tgii,,),oo prietor.. The authenticity of the important in r 10 1 communicated exclusively in the, Court Journal o ii le week does not appear to have been • din th e 4 I' cs questione be 0" matic cir • r lee, but the surprise is allgrest as to t whence it was derived. a to noel on .e._-, s tone it ET R ENC ti M ENT. —lt has been noti6e t She er ' the officers, clerks, and others in the Dock -yards l t , ~Issa .. "IC receiving salaries, that the same would be Own the following scale :—All salaries above 2001. Pee ear the be reduced 20/. per cent., and all Of 2001. and o n be reduced ibl. per cent.—.Xent Herald. EXTENSIVE BVIIGLARY.--TllO Or prell llse Lc, Mr. Soitaiswxt.t., of 90, Holborn-hill, tailor and rlo - Ir pil were last night or early this morning broken lil t° iylss plundered of cloth to the value of nearly ltl ° " , o 'birh thieves gained an entrance by raising the cellar-1141h„ car' it appears had never been properly secured hY t'' liar pewter who w. employed to alter it a short tinl e 0 0 when the new pavement was being laid down . , fact,ll' id means the thieves became acquainted with thi e a l , availed themselves of it. Having got into the a te it they easily burst the slight fastenings which ell „Oh from the ehop, where they packed up a quantitY ", „ i jori which it is supposed they carried away in a ... "'''„,Lch coach. They passed out through the ehop dr,.;1011 t t hey left it-jar, probably fearing lest the noiee he r,.; toS it too might awoke the family. A i ib et ai ow. — offered for their apprehension. ,_ ._