The Sun. — London, England, 1833-03-27 00:00:00

M ■ PFIMMI s/4/2 • so 4. • „ 4 C .04.7 1 t* . • r/ N , 110 *.' • • 4 11 ' • -- t- f! ,-V; • N of f g „ 4 1)", l'Ir.\1? „11 , ltuirm • ••••-::: : :h , 1 - t ° I actions had taken place some time ago, and had agreeri could he t u ri a } i o n r n s that l be fP d u p rl :r l h e ys e s u t r b i m e m o jr) b p n' i e t : i presumption out; b ut until an inquiry haeei!we i ght e Housel t a i u v n e h c l o a ou d t of cou l d the t a l kt o : o pet it ion p e p n i nat enter tain ch expressed by his Hon. and Learned Friend, as some of the errarges could only be verified by further inquiry, inasmuch is they referred to evidence which it was alleged was not, hut ought to have been taken before the courtmartial. There was only one other point to which he would allude. the H•m. Member for Middlesex had imputed general -hitrges against Gener rl D.rling a, governor of the colony, but he hoped that the proceedings of a sworn ribunal—sworn to execute justice—would he di'critni• dated from all charges against the G ivernment.— (" Hear, hear," from Mr. Hume.) The charges -*grins , the Government, and against General Darlinits , Mould be kept wholly distinct. He felt upon the Petirion most strongly, that the decision of a competent rribunal, which had been confirmed by a comp -tent autho ,:eeit:Yetteaswuttahhsaoterniwttireet:l were atd sentt t o h e r teosHot(eh)cret:; them. and aHr ewd Guards o h hue r l de had i d e f t or o uon t the e p pn themir(c) most conscientious in revising and considering all sen tences the merits of the petition ; but, without denying the petitioner the fullest opportunity for investigation, which ems dem.md.(l, he most say, that at nres.-ine he must hold that what bad been done bad been done legally. An HON. ME3IIIER thought that the initiiiiatkin so Reefed General Darling's character, as an officer and a f entletnan, that no friend of his would twos , the prayer if the petition. It would not only give justice to the .etitioner, but to the Gallant Officer hints If, if a full .nvestigation were to take place. There was one ponied-2 if the petition wherein it was stated that a charge against Captain Robison could not, in the Judge Advocate's pinion, be entered into, and yet the croirtinattial had arneeeded with it. That alone was sufficient to 611 , or an inquiry. As to General Darling's not knowit? until yesterday that the petition was to be presented to :ay, he mus, have been aware that such charges were to ie brought forward. It would be recollected that the retitioner did not come to that House mai. after he had died all other means of redress without «ff ct. He had -.yen petitioned the King fur an inquiry, and his p titian .ad been referred to the Comm andersin-C - .ief, where it )AY.) bY erit'e f ar or Sco tt 3,4 part, be ed out a to or • the ct the One t he ;men in t the jection, ing W l° s debt ; ch , ch" rf .s to consent's. THEOF ORDN ANCE, MARCH 18, 1833. T HE PRINCIPAL OFFICERS of his Li tfi ,MAJEsTY's ORDN A N CE do here b y g i ve N o' at PROP OSALS will b e rece i ve d a t the Ord e 24 of A No- Ace () ee, at Waltham Ahhey, on nr b e f ore Tersna persons pril, 1 833, at T velve &Clock, from such of 70 0 Bu " 'nay be willi ng to TENDER for the SUPPLY ..ndles of SEASONED BLACK DOGWOOD, be to be well scraped of its Bark, and each Bundle 1 0 6. b 6 feet i 1 a:"th 'engtb, 2 feet 9 inches in girth at one foot bottom, and the interior of the Bundle to he of g n i'd wood as that of the outside. To he delivered, r t " th of ex Penge, on or before the 31st of May, 1533, ato,..:llCYlioder House of the Royal Gunpowder Nlantifac ,t tort', subiec.t to the approval of the respective Officers valth 'in Abbey. Any further explanation will be given, on application of th:ab."arlt-Colonel Moody, Royal Eneineers, in charge '``llliGunpowder Minufactory, at Waltham Abbey. By Order of the Board, ( PRICE ID.) LONDON, WE 12,650.) IMPERIALPARLIAMEAT THIS DAY, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 27. most ohjecti. n ible. He had not been called upon by the Speaker for near y a fortnight, and the consequence was that his petitions had accumulated to the ❑umber of 56, He had attended day after day, in hopes of being able to present his p-titions, but was always disappointed. H e considered that the best plan to adopt would he—to have an alphe , etical list made out, and call upon I - lon. Mem bers in that order : that would put an end entirely to all number of clergymen in the same county, praying t'.e House to pans m?.a , ures to increase the efficiency of the the attempts he had put forward to do injustic to the persons who had come out under his com mands, and in consequence of those remonstrance• being disregarded, he had considered it his duty to mak, a complaint to the Commander in-Chief in this country. By the Articles of War, if a remonstrance did not receive due attention abroad, the party snaking that remonstrance had the power of sending representations to the Com. mander-in-chief in this country, for the purpose, if possible, of platting an end to the grievant ., complained of. Captain Robison having sent a remon strance to this country, a correspondence took place; and from a letter written to a gentleman holding the rank o' Lieutenant, warning was given of the danger in which be stood, and advising him to pursue an honourable line of S DO') Established Church. The petitions from Castletown were supported by an Hon. Member whose name we could not le in. Lord MORPETH, in presenting several petitions from the county of York in favour of the al.olition of colonial slavery, stated that that district had come forward with mote zeal and perseverance than any other part of the empire during the whole period of the struggle for the speedy and decided termination of that system. He should not touch further upon the subject, hut should at once present the petitions, which were from the following places :—Doncaster, Dewsbury (each signed by about 2,000 persons), the township of Idol, Gisborough ; the township of Eccleshill ; the congregation of the church of the Holy Trinity of Idol ; from the Protestant Dissenters of the Methodist new connexion at Pudsey Chapel, all in the North Riding of the county of York ; from the township of Barnalwiek ; from Kenniston, from Addinghall, and from Brinkhouse and its neighbour hood, all in the West Riding. He also presented petitions from the following places t—Tadcaster, Gainsborough, Hawmarsh, Gomersal, Rotherham, Biggleswade, and Whittington, in the West Riding of the county of York. He also had to present sever .1 petitions on the same sub ject, which had been intrusted to his Noble Friend the Member for Derbyshire, who was at present engaged on an Election Committee, viz., from Bakewell and Chesterfield, in the county of Derby; and from the minister and congregation of the Chinch of the Holy Trinity, in Upper Chelsea. The Noble Lord next presented a petition from the freeholders and inhabitants of the township of Stansfield, in the vale of Tothnordon, in the county of York, which complained of the great extent of want to which labourers were reduced, and attributing it to the darkness of ignorance. It prayed as a siseans of remedying that grievance that all taxes on knowledge, the stamps on newspapers, the advertise ment duty, and the duty on printed paper, be wholly abolished. He also presented a petition from the same parties for the repeal of the Septennial Act, and for the protection of the ballot. He next had to present a peti tion to which he would call the attention of the House, on account of the important subject on which it dwelt. It was from the clergymen of the Church of England, in the e istern part of the county of D , rset within the dio cese of Bristol, and was signed by fourteen officiating rectors and ministers resident there They were deeply anxious that all the abuses and imperfections that existed in the Church, and which impeded its usefulness, night be removed ; that the existence of all pluralities, except in cases of the contiguity of two small parishes which ad- mitted of it, might be abolished, and that it was highly necessary that each parish should have a resident minister. They were convinced that the true interests of the Church would be best promoted by doing away with trmsl itions of Bishops, except to the sees of Canterbury and York ; and in allusion to the present outcry a zainst the system of tithes, they prayed that some mode of remunerating the clergy should be devised, which would not be so objectionable. The Noble Lord said that the views of the petitioners, in which he fully concurred, did them high honour and credit, and they were also important as evidences of the spirit which actuated a large body who were in the bosom of the Church itself, and who would be happy to en-operate in amending the present defec•s in the Church, with a view of insuring the stability of that establishment which they adored, and to which they, as well as himself, would say "esto purer, esto perpetua." Lord MORPETH was desired by an Hon. Member to present a petition, now pot into his hands, from the borough of Kingsmill, in favour of the Irish Disturbances 0 4 n it ch 3 ,. 11 7, 0 01'0' 6 % 0 ' r- de the G`" EneliantteZ Hared, ',v. d the " 1" g , m.. 00; - „tt s outh. cK yis Maje4i • e : ? rich frig' The SPEAKER took the Chair soon after twelve o'clock. Mr. S. MACKENZIE presented petitions, praying for ;he better observance of the Said) Ali, from Kincardine R. BYHAM, Secretary. 1144:T IND IA -HOUSE, MARCH 25. 1533. COURT of DIRECTORS of the EGLit-x4.ITED COMPANY o f MERCHANTS of do hereby—, TRADING t o t h e EAST INDIES, That ' th g i ve Noti ce , which Pape rs respect i ng the Company ' s Ch arter, ', et. , l aid bef ore t h e General Court th i s d'y are Rod „;i i ; nt inz, for the information of the Proprietors, 'Esa A NEXT ready to he delivered at this House on WED , the 27th instant, at Noon. PETER AUBER, Secretary. T E H A p BI I NDIA HOUSE. Manx!' 25. 1833. CO URT of DIRECTORS of the tNhi,,NITED COMPANY of MERCHANTS of 4,44'4), T RADING to ' the EAST INDIES, do Tha,glve Notice, 4SI4ECIAL GENERAL COURT of . the said c l i k ''Y will he held by Adj inrnment. at their . House atti t;a;11holl-street, on MONDAY, the 15th April next, in the forenoon, to take into conside!a• werei.2".Pers respecting the Company's Charter, which aid before the General Court this day. PETER AUBER, Secretary. AST THE HOUSE, MARCH 20, 1833. _ -;OURT of DIREC T ORS of the .1 1‘1 GLA - tv — n iT ED COMPANY of MERCHANTS of " htr„C'" TRADING to the EAST INDIES, Y give Notice ultt~o 3 ' HA T PART of their Advertisement of the 27th -40 4 , ( 4 1 1 :1 ia v.vv'hlielhi they invited Tenders for BILLS upon DRAWN PETER AUBER, Secretary. ALL T "E THREE PRIZES OF Nll,rp - ,• °,00 0, all the other Capitals, and all i the ',heat r 'z , s. in the LOTTERY authorized by Par INa- Lthe im provement of Glasizow, will he drawn i i ,")ipi'O r ' at Coo ers' Ilall, in the City of London,.on ha :,, — `)DAY of , l ' ith of NEXT MONTH (April). 1 1 :,dra - ; n e . of Prizes may be received in money is soon f ;'ieh g nnf ,' rils Lottery contains only 10.000 . Tickets. the . 1 1si i n . "'" are already issued to the Public, and t b l )1 1 0 4 / ' .g 1,2,000 are not more than equal to one-fourth f ":elia t W „" t i _will b e required to meet the demands . o ° etween this and the Day of Drawing. THE TEETH. T tN ) ) ,ER anti DECAYED TEETH EF .;LORpr7-CTUALLY and PERMANENTLY RE ; hy Mr HOWARD, Surgeon Dentist, N . o. aPpli 'lett, with . an ANODYNE CEMENT, which 'vv'eett-fully to deca) ed Teeth, boa ever largefld theas ;tit ut , d ?ere every other kind of stopping I . ias t I ? a scot paste, •s quirineany h the Toot P h is te d g t v : a ng dr the least pai h n, re d eve s n die Tooth vhere itself. Tneethbevols as hard discolour or decay, r:gi w le T ic o ' ot w h i to a complete set. t", At home f ro m T e n till Five. In Cop) ;'i 1' S OF THE NATIVE PRINCES. days w ill h e published, in 2 vols. Bvo., ~.€ R 8 IN UPPER INDIA, 4 A ",, i ,r , PARTS of the HIMALAYA MOUNTAINS. E ei,,'OUNTS ' of the COURTS of the NATI Q Description of Oriental F eld Sports, &c. 14 By Major ARCHER, ) ,' t A id e d,-Camp to Lord Combermere. `"eho r d - Bentley, New Burlington-street. (Successor to Henry Coihurn.) and three parishes in Kincardineshire. Mr. W. BROUGHAM presented petition., to the same effect, from the parish of Bermondsey, and from the con gregation assembling in Southwark Chapel, Long-lane; also, a petition from the parish of Christchurch, praying for the repeal of the house and window duties, and one from the same parish against the New Polic:, Act. He said that he was sorry that his Hon. Friend, the Under Secretary for the Home Dep rtment, was prevented from taking his place that morning in consequence of illness. He had been requested by that Hon. Gentleman to defer presenting that petition ; hut as, accordine to the present arrangements of the House respecting petitions, he did not know when he should have another opportunity, he had declined acceding to the request. The petitioners compla.ned that the New Police Act repealed the Act of Geo. 111. which gave them power to appoint their own watch, and that the force which was now established was not so effective as the old on., while the cost had been nearly denied, the parish having been watched under the old system at the cost 4,f 1,1001., while they were now obliged to p the Commissioners of Police 2,1001 He aereed with the petitioners so far as to confusion. Mr. S. RICE considered that the plan proposed b y the Hon. Member for Oldham was li ible to this objec tion. that Han. Members, wh,se name might b , gin with A, B, or C, might occupy the time of the House to the total exclusion of those whose names unfortunately began with X, Y, or Z. Ile, however, considered that some m-asure ought to be adopted fur striking out the names of Hon. Members whose names appeared mire than once on the list, otherwise gentlemen might put down their names, and completely monopol:ze the whole time of the itution, Pier' conduct. The cnurtrnartial upon Capt. Robison subsequently assembled, and Captain Forbes was the Judge-Advocate, who had served upon the previous court of inquiry, whicl had been had with respect to Captain Robison. The adoption of such a course was totally at variance with the general usage of the army, and totally incom patible with justice--(Hear.) The proceedings of t h e courtmartial went on, and seven or eight charges were I n oderategt ti ), ,ailed i Ir. OP° The SPEAKER observed, that 11 in, Members ought not to put down their names before they had receivei v B63ble o /.1 Doffn'' ~~'`~ ht petitions to present. Mr. GEORGE EVANS prestnted a petition from the united parishes of Palaster, against the Irish Coercive piopounded, which he (Dr Lushinzten) had read, and he would take upon himself to declare that he never saw Bill. Mr. FITZSIMON concurred in the prayer of the charges less specific, less clear, less perspicuous, or mon confused. One wilt of the charge was disrespect to thv Commander-in-Chief, in having sent home a complaint to the Commander-in-Chief in this country. Th, chi from St ic o ge petition. Mr. G. EVANS then presented a petition from the parish of Alore, in the eiqinty of Carmarthen, against the Irish Church Ref“rm Bill. The petit , onersstated that petitioner complained that on the trial before the court martial he was prevented from cross•examining witnesses produced against him, the questions which he pro posed for the cross ex ttnination of the witnesses having been refused by the Court. The adoption of such 3 C O nd D r° . t; The fr o own, say, that the persons who paid the money had a right to be satisfied that they were called on for no more than their due proportion of the burden which the new establi , hment had entailed on the districts in which it had been brought into practice. In I ist session an Hon. Member proposed that the subject generally should he re ferred to a Select Committee—if such a motion w s now the proposed Bill of Reform was in direct contradiction of the words and intention of the coronation oath. It also stated that the proposed plan would remove ten bishops, and ten . . . ..,1...1. The petitioner was, therefore, obliged to come to hat House. a course he (Dr. Lusaington) was sure the House would be of opinion was a total violation of all military law. The petitioner complained that one of the witnesses had been tampered with, and that evidence of an illegal character had been adduced.—( Hear, hear.) It was well known to every man that the rule was, from the highest tribunal to the lowest, that the best evidence should be produced, and so long as there was an oppor tunity of producing that evidence which was lost, so long it was impossible that secondary evidence could be receive.% It was obvious also to every man, that the great benefit of viva voce evidence was, that when you had an opportunity of cross-examining a witness, you might extract from him circumstances which might destroy the validity of the evidence itself, by proving the witness not entitled to belief. There were many other Dr. LUSHINGTON, in moving that the peation do le on the table, said that he would have giv n Gerietatl Darling a longer notice, but it was impossible for him nil 0 do, as he did not know until Monday that he should be ible to present it to•day. He trusted that in presenting , t he had made use of no expressions from himself that reflected on that Gallant Officer's character.—(Hear.) In answer to his Right Hon. Friend (Mr. Giant) who, le was glad to perceive, gave no opinion on the , nerits of the petition, he thought it the best and inost satisfactory mode that the minutes of the courtm4rtial -.hould be laid before the Hone. He, therefore, gave notice, that on Thursday, the 23d May, he would move for the production of the papers. S r E. KNA CCEIBULL pres-nted petitions from Tun bridge and Margate, fur a better observance of the Lord's Day, and from the Grand Jury of Ki-nt, and from the iouseholders of the western division of that county for an *lteration in the Beer Bill. 1;35C0 t CO UdW' r /; O .„ d, tat g hus4:- . o n , 'or S in f g i n r 0^; the WO ' rotae n ' h Th e itca, it o• , 4 f" he 00 0 ,yon, i ce k iln The ili a , isaY , and SS tho Asia, noblemen from Ireland, which w<is a country where non residence was among one of its greatest miNfortunvs. With brought forward by any Hon. Member, he would most willingly give it his support. Such an inquiry, in his opinion, would be attended with many benefits, for at the present time, the new police in some districts were in such bad odour with the inhabitants, that they the whole prayer of the petition he entirely concurred. Colonel PERCEVAL presented a petition from the Protestants and Catholics of the town and neighbourhood of Elphin, in the county of Roscommon, against the Irish Church Reform 8,11. The petition was particularly scarcely dare appear on any public occasion. —(Hear. ) One inst .rice he could state on his own knowledge. • pointed against the clause which went to remove the Pro testant bishop from Elphin. It also steed that the public charitable institutions in the neighbourhood were largely _ . At the last election he was obliged to pay 1301. for special constables, and that in a district which was supposed to be effectively watched by the new police; and Mr. Nlerris, the High Bailiff of Southwark, gave as his rea son for hiving such a force, that he had received notice, that if the new police were allowed to appear during the election, the peace of the borough would be very much endangered. Such were the complaints made by his constituents, and still had been the practical wotking of the system as felt by himself. Mr. WILKS had had many applications made to him on the subject of the New Police, both the last Session and the present. He was one who much opposed the in troduction of such a force, but the Bill having been passed he was willing that the system should have a full and fair trial. Nearly all the information that could be got by a Select Committee was already before the House by the papers that were laid on the table every year. If in those papers a statement was made of the pay to the several trades of the men employed and the expense incurred for clothing, the House would have every information before them they could wish on the subject. The ,nly fault that he could find with them was, that on many occasions when they were most wanted, there was a difficulty in finding them. However, .o long as they conducted themselves in the manner they bad hitherto done, they ought to receive the support of the pui.lic. It was necessary that -uch an establishment should be perpetually watched by that House. Mr. R. OSWALD presented petitions against the Irish Bill, from the pit ishes of West Kilbride, Beitb, Kilwin ning, and Newcumnock ; for the better observance of the Sabbath, from Cumnock, Kirkpatrick, and Ardrosian ; for the abolition of slavery, from Kilwinning and Salt coats; also one fiom Cumnock, IT the abolition of the corn laws, and one from the same parish, for the abolition of Church pa'ronak e in Scotland ; and one from the hand lo,im weivers of Irvine, complaining of distress, and praying for a Parliamenra , y incriiry into it. Mr. WILBRAHAM presented petitions from the Chapelry of Birdwater, from Harthill, Mahon. Middle wick, and from the burgesses of the town and borough of Congleton, all in the county of Cheshire, for the better observance of the ii;abhath. Some of the petitioners alleged chat the increase of public houses and beer shops hail tended to increase the de-ecration of the Sabbath. supported by the Bishop of Elphin. It also stated that it was next to impossible if those bishoprics intended to be united were so, that the duties could be perf.rtned in a way . . to suppo►t the true sphit of the Christian religion. The Hon 1 11 , -mber then presented a petition from the in h ruitants of Foxford, in the diocese of Kilrnallow, in the Chi n '' - 0 1 h )13:1' 4 iS The TO. complaints. There was a complaint of the manner in which the minutes of the courtmat tial wet, taken—of the evidence not having been taken on each specific charge, but in a mass, all mingled to gether ; so that it was utterly impossible for any person, without taking a great deal of pains and labour, to make himself a complete master of the case, to do justice in his (Dr. Lushington's) judgment to the prisoner. Another complaint was, that one of the witnesses was permitted, before he underwent his cross-examination, actually t. is• nd tts, '' ria3 uot P, county of niyo, to the same purport. It was signed by the merchants and inhabitants of ad persuasions, and it stated that by this measure they would be grievous suf ferers—that many would be reducr d to a state of ruin if the removal of the Bishop were sanctioned. It also stated that it would be injurious to the prosperity of the town, and mentioned many evils which had been the consequence of the withdrawal of regular employment offered to many persons. The Hon. Member also presented a petition from Newcastle-under Lyme,vrry numerously and respect ably signed, fir the better observance of the Sat , bath. The petitioners attributed the vi.lation of the Sabbath to the inn eased number of those odious places of resort—the b-er shops. He had also to state that his Hon. Friend, the Member for Newcastle under-L} me, did not find him self able to attend the House to-day, to support this peti tion, in consequence (as we understood) of ill health. Toe next petition he had to present was from Sir Har court Lees, which stated that he believed the measures of Ministers to be ca'culated to have a good effect—that they ought to extend the suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act all over Ireland—that the publication of any news p per cont ining exciting language, ought to he declared a misdemeanor—and that the repeal of the Catholic Emancipation Bill of 1829 ought immediately to take p ace, without which there never would be peace in I e land. The last petition was from the governor and offi err, of thr gaol of Sligo, paying to be put on the same footing as that on which the same sort of persons stand in England. 111 r. LAMBERT presented a petition from a parish in Mr. COBBETT said, that he never heard a petition n the nature of that which had just been presented by the Ron. Member, without raking upon himself to say, filar e was no remedy but the repeal of the malt and hop duties. s erpOo'' BRIGSTOCK presented petitions from Glastor.- hury, and several other places in the county of Somerset, tgainst slavery, and for the better observance of ac Sa'tb Ith. "' ,ng3P° LY.) Mr. MORGAN O'CONNELL presented petitions from several parishes in the county of Meath, agamst the Irish Coercion Bill, and in favour of the Rep-al of the Union. The Hon. Member then presented petitions from the freeholders of Killarney, in the county of Kerry, igainst the Irish Coercion Bill. Also a petition from the borough of Gamin for vote by ballot, and one from the borough of Rye, against the suspension ,f trial by jury and martial law in Ireland. Also a peti tion from Mr. Kirkland, in Dublin, complaining of the Corporation of that city.—Referred to the Committee on Corporations. . . Ct ° 4 , fon:, only 3ccou, hav i, e o a tri'd sFr:ince 'reeo at the 4 of tl' e tt : i' t Y D' l tating_ s ; g :,:i v go an vr— o ot e the c°l° _ . Mr. H. GRATT AN supported the petitions. Sir H. HARDINGE regrett, d ;hat in consequence of being unavoidably assent elsewhere, he had been pre vented from making certain statements in reply to t h e petiti o ns and charges of the Honourable and Learned Member for the Tower Hamlets, relative to the e, induct of his friend General Darling in relation to Cap 'ain Robinson. As he understood, however, that the lion. and Learned Gentleman h,id postponed his motion to some day in May, he should then urge some statements in defence of his friend General Darling. Sir R VYVYAN presented a i petition from the soap boilers of the city of Bristol, praying for a repe,l of the I uty ou that article. Also a petition from the Clergy of the Deanery of Bristol, against the Irish Church R•torin Bill. The Hon. Member also presented a petition from Bristol, for the better observance of the Sabbath and similar o•titions from Chego, and from another place in Stafford shire. Mr. READER presented a petition from the inhabitants of South Shields, in favour of the abolition of slavery. The House rose at three o'clock. (\ii i4t aublish , d, in evo., price One Shil I'aVATIONS on IMPEDIMENTS with Remarks on their TREAT t'k4'Letter addressed to 'l'. J. Pettigrew, Esq., e,t4z, the county of Wexford, prying for vote by b Mot. The Hon. Member then presented sepal ate petitions, from six parishes in the sam-t county, praying for he repeal of the Union; also two petitions, one from Caine against the tithes. b RICHARD CULL. and Rush, 356, Strand. ~lBNt.xt " vl 'elc, in one large volume, 16s. cloth, r ,` " ler rHECA CL ASSICA ; or a tirely s'IASSICAL DICTIONARY, on a Plan en thht Pr tle , W ' containing a minute and accurate Account of gra " ° l .`„ r ,l‘Tarries which occur in Gre.k and Latin Au -ating to History,Biography, Mythology, Geo- Il" InHN 4n4 Anticit DY\lo eB ('K, LL.D., and THOMAS L OAgDYMOCK, M.A. s ' qit r tn l an : p f ett,Orm e. and Co , London ; A. Black, Cumming, Dublin. tr"` ti 'lled thi s day, the sth Edition, enlarged, of A RNOTT'S ELEMENTS OF "itte„ PH YSICS NATURAL PHILOSOPHY ; Rt. universal " 'or ' or la n use, in plain or non-technical o 1 1, 4 , i 215.) has Treatises on Mechanics, l Hy- L '‘ v lth an account of the Floating Bed,. .ately N'th,..,a-ti by tr. Amon . for the relief o . f the bed-ridden), shert 1 ( Acoustic s , Animal Mechanics, ; V.,l l Tee 104. 6th) on Heat, Light or Optics, ,"n r i o 4l . Pirt 2 (to be pull shed in May, corn pitting EL•etrieitv, Magnetism, and Astrono d t i r t ly. a, a treads '1.) will read this work with as mi!p2v irt i es y - if i„,4t,, on witchcraft or what Magazine. i - "ti t Z•:11 and excellent work."—Sir J. Herschel. 1311 . fflgrrian, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, anti Co. °t 'itTENAys LAST POPULAR WORK. AN p, The 19th Editi on , p r ice 4s. p'OI,tBTORICAL and PRACTICAL ,i'',P ,s ;c T E'V I I , SE on SYPHILIS and its CONSE -Itll Illustrated by m a ny extraordinary cases. To ar e pe a s, d cc], Practical Observations on Diseases of the tsi o _ a Yinetri,.on Nervous, i General, tr,atn.,e o n n a t n , d Local De the result of 0'444 ointhisrupertor years' mode of and successful practice. 13 Y C. BCOURTENAY, M.D., H owland-street, Fitzroy-square, late of Robert , A l i street, Adelphi. Late " 4 for th e A ut h or , an d so ld by Sh e rwood and Co.; r4tr,Z" lte r•row • Onwhyn, 4, Ca , herine•street, Strand; Oxford-street ; Chappell, 59, Pall-ma 44 " , Calton-street, Edinhurgh ; and all Bookse ' lle ' rs. k ,Pr Of whom also may be had, ilip() UR TEN A Y'S celebrated TREATISE on 1, 41 VJRES of the URETHRA and RECTUM, in IvsehCtrictures of from ten to twenty years' duration ritye 'fret:tunny cured in a few weeks, and its supe +.4til"eby fully established, being the Twenty-first ‘'icrice ^ s 41144)1,1',01AattTltil '3Warnings' s taken of these diseases, together with k g against excesses entitle these works to ;',,,l•Writ t fi d We may add, as a further ' recommendation, that hi,lo4l;rlAry Pl at ^kejt~r p with much delicacy and morality."—lnspector P n it tl y. highest opinion of Dr. Courtenay:sprof , es , - , 44 il,''qt - ",``,cong 'e rat i ula ' te him on his successful and ud ro ici ca u n s I NQ o ' 1 :* ° ' n ose severe and often fatal diseases."—}u p V ri l °tll - BLE ARTIFICIAL TEETH FIXED Nv , IKES OR OTHER LIGATURES, t4A-LL,,t.ING DECAYED TEETH WITH MI IONVICCEDANEUM. 111 IR UR M ALLAN anti SONS, Sur bentists, No. 9, HALF MOON-STREET , D Ai r ` h NSh' i , V, a0t132 GREAT RUSSELL-STREET, gratefu l l for the high and E.EXTENSIVE tt, ) - 1' 115 4a1 Which has so eminently distinguished their A 415, txertions since their arrival in the British Me aye to announce to their Friends and the AIINIEL,.D In . 1 : 4 1, that t h ey st ill CONTINUE to RE. Net{ ' te R AI, ''YED TEL' with their CELEBRAT ED rat ion • by th_ C DANEUM, so universally . recom oti. PD,.`, Fac ulty of London and Paris. The o.p.e -' th„ SLIG a , RAZED IN A FEW SECONDS, with for m a he LiT EsT PAIN, HEAT, or Pressure, and . yeZt EXC RUCIATING PAIN, and lasting NISR.LII4."; they also FASTEN LOOSE TEETH, Izll A i n SING from AGE, NEGLECT, o l r LETR L a NN A t -,,, h e„ GUMS. INCORROI)IBLE M • LtIU R Set, --,.iuRAL TEETH, from one to a COM ,nenn,l7 : n ich are INCAPABLE of DlSCO atb,we;44ce ofs4JORROSION, and fixed without the d Al4, r , eve ry I ," 'refs or any other LIGA3 URES, , an 41CA TIO (1 . 111) °SE of ARTICULATION and All O pera --- as in Pis. ti I) us performed on ar the Teeth. Mr. G W. WOOD presented a petition trom:the free holders, and other inhabitants, of Bletchingworth, near Rochdale, praying for a repeal of the taxes on knowledge and the duty on paper —(Hear, hear.) The peti tioners attributed the fires which had alarmed the country, and the lamentable riotines at Dieu' and other places to the ignorance in which the lower classes were kept by the continuance of these obnoxious taxes. The Hon. Member , hen presented a petition from the same parties complaining of the state of wretchedness to which numberless families were reduced in conse quence of extreme pressure of taxation, and the changes caused by alterations in the currency. The p titioners prayed for relief from all taxes pressing upon the industrious classes of the community, and in particular fur the repeal of the duty on malt, hop•, and soap. He then presented a petition from the same parties, which st,aed that the tithe sy•tem had an evil effect, not only on the prosperity of the country, but also on the happiness of the people, and that the corn laws tended to add to this evil. They, therefore, prayed for the abolition of tithes, and the repeal of the corn laws. He next presented a petition from the congrega tion of Protestant Dissenters assembling at Ashton-under- Line, in the county of Lancaster, praying that all places ap propriated to divine worship might be exempted from the payment of poor rates, and that the petitioners might he redeved from all Church rates and all similar imposts. The Hon. Member then presented a petition from the Pro testant Dissenters assembling at Toxteth, near Liverpool, praying for the removal of all disabilities affecting the civil rights of the Jews, and a similar petition from Ashton-under-Line and Staley Bridge. Ile pre sented also a petition from certain manufacturers and others in the town of Manchester, impugning the evi dence taken before the Committee, relative to the Labour Bill. The petitioners prayed, that the present law, which was frequently broken with the concurrence of the work people, should be first enforced before any new enact ments were made, and that the Hon. House would send down a commission of inquiry to take evidence on the spot. The lion. Member also presented similar petitions from the cotton-manufacturers of Wigan and Renfrew. Sir M. S. STEWART supported the prayer of the pe tition from Renfrew. PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS. Mr. G. WOOD said, before moving that the petitions be presented, he wished to call the attention of the House to the state of the list on which Hon. Members put down their names, to be called on to present petitions. He had put down his name on that list at the commencement of the present session, and it was not until this day that it had come to his turn to present them ; and that must be his excuse to his constituents for not presenting their petitions earlier. On looking over this list, the other day, he found many hundred names down, so that he stood but very little chance of having another opportunity of pre senting petitions for some time to come ; but what he most complained of was, that Hon. Members' names occurred more than once in that list ; nay, more, one Hon. Mem ber's name occurred no less than eight times. Now he (Mr. Wood) apprehended that the adoption of such a course was dealing most unfairly by other Hon. Members and their constituents ; and be trusted that the House would adopt score mode of putting a stop to it. The SPEAKER said, that he felt assured that the House would feel itself under an obligation to the Hon. Member for having stated what he had done. He (the Speaker), however, considered that it arose from some oversight on the part of H on. Members, without once considering what course justice requirel to be pursued. Up to the last session, the paper was made out for the day, and put into the Speaker's hands ; and if he had n,it time sufficient to go through the paper, on the next day a new paper was made out, and the gentlemen on the paper of the preceding day , to ok their chance of being called upon. When the new arrangement was made of the House sitting at 12 o'clock, it was pro i posed that the list should go on, de die in diem, but t was never supposed that Hon. Members would put down their names in anticipation of receiving petitions to present to the House. The names of Hon. Members might appear more than once on the list, without incorrectness ; but that one name should be repeated eight times, as the Hon. Member had adverted to, was manifestly an abuse of the plan which had been proposed. Mr. COBBETT thought the plan now in existence ; of ColosiO''j ff o f e' %wife _ f s . t;.nierlY o 00 0. 4, theo "lY(04 r), 'OV IIChb 1104 Mr. CHILDERS presented sevtral petitions from pa• riches in the taainty of Cambridge, praying fur the Milne• diaie abolition of neero slavery. Mr. D. GASKELL presented a petition from the inha. bi,ants of the town and neighbourhood of Wakefield again, the Irish Disturbances Bill. Having opposed the first and second reading of this Bill, the Hon. Member cordially concurred with the prayer of the petition. Lord MORPETH sail it was always irksome to reflect upon petitions, as it usually led only to recrimination ; in deed, he had felt this to be so a few days aao, by the pro diction of a b-tter which had been sent to him against a petition, which oas immediately followed by one on the other side in support of the petition. With respect to the petition which had just been presented, he hid no objection to make to it—it had been agreed to at a public meeting duly converted and regularly hell; but a protest against it had been put into his hand—it was not a petition, and therefore lie could not lay it on the table. T e protest was signed by persons of the first respectabi lity, and many of them of great mercantile character in the borough of Wakefield, and they had requested him to make all the use of it in his power. By this protest they stated that so far from concurring with the petition, in their opinion unless the outrages which bad been committed in Ireland were suppressed by the passing of this or some efficient Bill, the Ministry would be guilty of a dereliction of duty, and all the consequences of a weak and inefficient Government would be entailed on the United Kingdom. Mr. COBBETT said the Noble Lord was rather un fortunate in his premises. With respect to the petition which had come from Todlington, it was sign-d as repec. tably as any petition that had ever come into the House of Commons ; notwithstanding that the Noble Lord had a letter impugning the character of the petitioners generally—stating that the petition was got up is a hole and corner manner, and had been left in pot houses to be signed. His (Mr. Cobbett's) Hon. Colleague was present at the time the petition was presented, and had the letter of the Noble Lord, stated to the House, also with instructions, in his pocket ; and he showed the Noble Lord that all the principal persons, in the district from which the petition bad come, had signed it ; and that the letter (as it turned out) which the Noble Lord had re ceived, had been sent to him by some little attorney.— (Hear, hear.) In the present instance, the Noble Lord was equally unfortunate. He (Mr. Cobbett) would not disguise names, and would read a letter from a gentleman at Wakefield, relating the whole of the circumstances respecting the pethon and this protest, and which would show to the House the character of the petitioners, and the character of those who opposed it. His lion. Colleague, to whom the letter was addressed, was obliged to attend a Committee to-day, and therefore was unable himself to attend ; but he (Mr. C.) had been deputed to state this letter to the House. The letter stated that the writer had just been informed, that one of the protesters bad disapproved of the petition, and that he feared the resignation of Earl Grey more than any other calamity. The protest, he had been told, had been hawked about by two attorneys, who were friends of Lord Morpeth, to prop up whose votes he suspected the measure had origi nated. A meeting of last Thursday was regularly called, by the constable, and signed by the writer's friend, Mr. Waterton, of Walton Hall, who filled the chair at the meeting, and which was attended by the writer himself. The petition was then agreed to and numerously signed ; and though some of the signers of the counter petition or protest, as it had been called, were present, not one of them opened his mouth against any of ;le resolutions that were passed unanimously at that meeting ; so that these protesters actually were present at the meeting, but had not the courage to divide the meeting, or even to say a word against any of the resolutions. The name signed to the letter was that of " Joseph Wood." Lord MORPETH was not aware of the extent of that misfortune which the Hon. Gentleman said attached to him. All that he had done was to claim only that weight for the protest which the names attached to it would bear him out in. Mr. GASKELL was perfectly aware that the names to the protest were highly respectable. The Hon. Member then presented petitiras in favour of the Factory Bill, from Wakefield and its vicinity, and Ilomefrith, both in the West Riding of Yorkshire, and one from the Unitarians of Norwich, in favour of Jewish emancipation. Mr. PENDARVES presented a petition, signed by 80 agricultural labourers, two churchwardens, and other in habitants of a parish in Cornwall, praying for a commu tation of tithes ; two from Castletown, in Merionethshire , praying for the abolition of slavery,—and one signed by a Bill. Lord G LENNOX begged leave to testify that the petition now presented to the House, if not more nume rously, a'as more respectably signed than any petition that had ever proceeded from that town. An HoN. MEB/ZER rose to order. He objected that any petition should receive priority of presentation, through the hands of any Hon. Member, excepting the one to whom it was sent, so as to enable that lion. Mem ber to make a speech upon Its presentation. This had ti.-en laid down as iriegular in the instance of a petition brine pre-eared by an H, n. Member for Dublin. Lord GEORGE LENNOX conceived that the courtesy of the House would be extended to this petition, when he informed the House that a petition from the same town, not so numerously or so respectably signed, which prayed that the Irish Disturbances Bill might not be passed, had b•-en presented by the Hon. Member for Middlesex, out of turn, the same having been sent to his (Lord G. Lennox's) Hon. Colleague for prey• ntation. The SPEAKER said that the rule of presentation had been laid down, and he believed sufficiently understood by the House; but if an Hon. Member placed a petition sent to him in the hands of another Hon. Member, and no statement was made to that effect, it required some one of more experience than him (Mr. Speaker) to discover that such a transfer had taken place. The HON. MEMBER who spoke to order, said that he should not have had an opportunity of doing so, if it were not that the Noble Lord who presented the petition stated that it had been just then put into his hands. Ater a few words from Lord WILLIAM LENNOX, the SPEAKER, and Mr. HUME, the petition, as we understood, was withdrawn. . . Dr. LUSHINGTON rose to present several petitions on the subject of the better observance of the Sabbath Day, from the inhabitants of pat ish-s in the county of Herte from the Methodists of Poplar and Limehouse ; and from the Episcopal Chapel of Highbury. Also two petitions from Shadwell, in favour of the repeal of the assessed taxes. The Hon. and Learned Gentleman then said he had another petition, to which it was his duty particu larly to call the attention of the House, from a gentleman named Robert Robison, late a captain in his M ijesty's sei vice, and who, after serving 25 years in various p ins of the world, was afterwards sent out, in 1825, being then a Captain on the half-pay of the 17 h Light Dragoons, to command a corp of out-pensioners in New South Wales. The petition coin ,alained of the treatment which that gen , lemen had met with from General Darling, Governor of New South Wales, during his residence there, and more especially of the illegal proceedings of a courtmartial by which he was tried and convicted. He (Dr. Lushington) had been requested to present the petition to a former Parliament, but such was the press of business arising from the discussions on the Reform Bill, that from the period it had come into his hands, in consequence of the la mented death of his late friend Sir J. Mscintosh,he had had no opportunity of ca ling the attention of the House to it till now, so particularly as he wished. He was well s ttisfied that the statements in the petition demanded the serious attention of the Members of that House ; and he was convinced if a proceeding such as was there described had taken place in a distant colony, from that very cir cumstance it required, when oppression was complained of on the part of an individual stating himself to be aggrieved, so great was the power necessarily in trusted to those who governed those coloni s, that it was the particular duty of the House to examine into the nature of those complaints, and if well founded to appoint adequate redress. It was very difficult to state the contents of that petition without imputing very serious blame to General Darling, the Governor of th.t colony, and the person?. who compo-ed that courtmartial. At the same time he must say that he always held he was not bound te, support the prayer of any petition lie presented, unle?.l he had some cause for believing that the matters therein stated were grounded in truth. He had applied to his Right Hon. Ft iend, the Judge Advocate, with the view of ascertaining some of the facts stated in the peti tion ; and, without utriertaking to pledge himself to the correctness of every statement contained in it, he was in his conscience perfectly satisfied that their general truth was such as would justify him in support ing the prayer of the peti , ion for the production of the minutes of the courtmartial, which would enable the House to judge for itself whether the charges were or not founded in truth. He felt himself bound to observe, that if this were a mere question of doubt, under the circumstances of the case, it would he positive injustice to refuse the production of the evidence, as it was only in that way that it could be ascertained whether the complaints were well founded, or whether an address made to that House for its assistance hail been presented on just and proper grounds. It ap geared in very s h or tly after the arrival of Captain Ro bison n New South Wales the corps, to command which Ire was sen out, was dispersed in various parts of the colony, an d t h ere was very go od reason to com plain even at this time of the conduct of Gen. Darling At the time that Captain Robison left this country, .not only had he an u n i mpeac h e d c h a ract e r in the prote"'"' but he also had many testimonials as to that cha racter. He remo ns t ra t e d w ith Gen e ral Darling against have a perusal of the evidence which he had given in chief Now, that was a circumstance which he had never beard of in the whole course of his life.—( Hear, hear.) Every person had a great advantage in a cross-examination, as that you either, at the instant, proceeded to the cross-examination of the witnesses, or, if necessity required it, you then allowed the cross-examination to be postponed to a future day. If you allowed the wit ness in the mean time to refresh his memory by the pe t usal of the evidence that he had given, you enabled him to withstand all cross-examination, and to'give evidence , in complete conformity with that which be bad before gdaen,,—(Hear, hear.) In addition to that, if the charge s had been proved, they were not such, in his judgment, taking all the circumstances into consideration, a► j estified the sentence which had been pronounced. The sentence pronounced was a sentence of dismissal. Now he would a-k the House to consider what severe consequences must 101 l tw to a person so tried, so con victed, and so punished? This gentleman had not mere) served in the army 20 years, but his grandfather, father, six brothers, and two nephews, had been in the service He was aware that when such a case as the present one was brought b -fore the House, it was met by saying that military men were aware of the risks they ran, and that it was dangerous for that House to open any case which had be n decided by a competent tribunal. He was ready t.. admit that principle, to a great extent, but he was not ready to say that a case in our colonies, where the Governor way in possession of despotic power, being so far from home— that that House ought not to take cognizance of a case sucl. as the present, where such a strong case for inquiry had been made out. He should inform the House that th. petitioner was kept for two years under arrest, and th e t then an examination was gone into by the predecessor of his Right Hon. Friend the present Judge Advocate. He did not intend tit throw any imputation upon the gentleman who then held the office, for lie knew th when a person had an immense mass of papers to wade through, it was impossible hut that many important point would escape his attention. Since the petitioner had returned he had made many applications for those minutes ; bat they had been unauccesful He hoped now that they would be submitted to the inspection of his Right Hon. Friend, and he was sure that if that course were taken it would give satisfaction to all parties, for he was sure that that Right Hon. Gentleman would at once do all that the justice of the case required. He had felt it his duty to trouble the House at length, because he const- .„ . dered it a case of the utmost importance.—(Hear, hear.) He was only anxious to make such statements as his duty required, and had not intended to step out of his way to vituperate any person. He had considered it his duty to inform General Darling of his intention to present such a petition, and make such a statement as he had, so that the gallant officer might instruct any of his friends in that House to answer if necessary. The prayer of the petition was for the production of the minutes al the courtmartial. If the subject was not taken up by the Government, he would take the earliest opportunity of submitting a motion on the subject. He sincerely hoped that he should not be driven to take such a course, for such a strong case of su.pici in bad been made, that he trusted that Government would be anxious to refer the whole matter to the Right Hon. Judge Ad vocate. Mr. HUME said he rose for the purpose of supporting the prayer of the petition, with which be entirely con curred. He had long been informed of the contents of the petition, and if he had persisted in the motion of which i l he had given notice with respect to the conduct of Gen. Darling, it would have I,rmed one of his charges. It was the duty of the Government to take up the case in time, so that the time of that House might not be taken up with cases, which were immediately belonging to them. He was informed by many most re spectable persons in this country, that every one of the allegations in the petition could be proved, and, of course, 'hat gross injustice had been done to the petitioner. This was not only a question for the consideration of the Go vernment, but it was one which they should be most anxious to sift to the bottom. He would take that opportunity of stating that it was not his intention to bring forward his motion with respect to Gen. Darling's conduct at the present time, as he considered be would best consult the wishes of the House by abstaining from ripping up old cases, but he trusted the present case would he pursued with all diligence. An Hort. MEMBER (whose name we could not learn) said he could not let the opportunity pass without stating that he had the honour of Captain Robison's acquaint ance, and that from what he knew of him he would say that he was incapable of doing anything that was unbe coming a gentleman. Mr. CHARLES G RANT—His Hon. and Learned Friend had stated rightly, that he (Mr. C. Grant) was not in office at the period alluded to. From the nrure of the petition, and from the manner in which it had been brought before the notice of the House by his Hon. and Learned Friend, that it was his (Mr. C. Grant's) duty, if in his power, to meet the allegations of the peti tion. But besides other documents, the proceedings of the courtmartial alone comprised the contents of three -normous folio volumes. It was therefore impossible for him to go through such a mass of evidence in time to give any individual opinion ; and be felt called upon to give 'hat explanation, upon the motion that the petition do lie upon the table. He would admit that the state ments made in the petition received great weight from the opinion expressed of them by his Hon. and Learned Friend ; and that such an application must receive an inswer ; hut, without imputing any intentional want of courtesy to his Han. Friend, he must inform the House that the notice of the intention to present the petition had only been given yesterday. The Hon. Member for Mid dlesex had expressed a hope that the prayer of the petition would not be disregarded by that House, because the trans, COURT CIRCUt AR. The Princess AUGUSTA lets town about twelve o'clock .esterday, for the Palace at Windsor, to be present at the celebration of the birthday of Prince GEORGE of Cain twidge. His Royal Highness completel his fourteenth year esterday. A large party of the nobility and gentry are staying at the Castle, accompanied by the junior branches of their respective families. A juvenile ball was to be given last evening in honour of the day. The Duchess of KENT and the Princess VICTORIA drove in the park yesterday. Earl GREY, Viscounts GODERICH and ALTHORr, Sir JAMES GRAHAM, Lord HOLLAND, Lord JOHN RUSSELL, nd Viscount flowrcx held a meeting yesterday at the t s e s r a d d ,, o; s at had ail the n F t e t r i r v e i i ; wTreasury,th Thev is V isc o unt uh Frenchni e t h pa l lasted E s uft o t sc l some h ours. N ny ebsa office. A deputation of Scotch Members,' including Colonel LEITH HAY, Mr. HA LYBIJRTON, Captain GORDON, and Mr. Ross had a conference with Viscount Am HORP yes terday at the Treasury 1,-sp , ctitig the malt duties. The SPEAKER'S last Parliamentary levee for the present Session will be on Saturday next, 30th inst. His MAJESTY arrived at St. James's Palace shortly after one o'clock, from Windsor, escorted by a party of the 17th Regiment of Lancers. At two o'clock, the LORD CHANCELLOR. and the other Cabinet Ministers had a private audience. The Xxxc, then held a Levee, which was attended by all the foreign Ambassadois, and a great number of military and naval officers. The bands of the Coldstream and 2d Life Guards were in attendance. An eminent spirit-merchant in Dublin an nounces, in one of the Irish pip,rs, that he has still a small quantity of the whisky on sale which was drank by his late Majesty while in Dublin! DISTRESSING SUlClDE.—Yesterday an in quest was held at the Queen's Head, St. John-street, Smithfield, on the body of MARY LUCAS, aged 29. It appeared that she was respectably connected, and that she lived with a person named JONES for nine years, and kept the Crown Inn, at Birmingham. He deserted her a few months ago, and being reduced to great poverty, she took poison at her lodgings, in St. John-street. This was not discovered till she was on the point of death, about twelve o'clock on Monday night. She was asked if she had taken anything, and she said, faintly, " No ;" and turning her eyes upward, muttered, " WILLIAM. I shall see you in heaven !" and never spoke afterwards. Ver dict—Temporary derangement. SUPPOSED MURDER OF ANOTHER BOY. --Ever since Wednesday se'nnight the inhabitant/1 of n „llillaerrgaabrieyt-st excitedree t, a i ve n c r o a ni p e l g a u c e e n , c H a c o k f n ey T_ o a v T e u r been y N c c o aged 10 years, the son of poor parents, residing in Marga ret-street, being absent under circumstances similar to those which preceded the murder of the boy PAvrouß. It appears that on the evening of Wednesday week the boy a,ked leave to go out to play, and shortly after he was seen some distance from his home in the company of a middle-aged man, attired in a fustian jacket and corduroy trousers, rather tall, and of mean appearance. The boy has not returned home since, and every inquiry has been wade to discover him to no purpose. Information has also been received at Islington and other station-boo:ws. of v a v i l i en l c i e li o p f ec a t n or im o! several other boys missing from their homes under simi lar vttu circumstances, ever since the beginning of February last, and the present month, one from Friar-street,. Hackney, ,ind two from the neighbourhood of Pentonville, but no tidings can be traced of them, and the discovery . of the murder of the boy Pavroua. bas create day ;r i ongbelief that they have shared a similar fate. interviewYester r. Lsatic, the of PAYIOU Magistrate,E r d t ui d ivi sion, o xi n s , u r rebeliidteioYal Ce'P it is said, the n t tdree‘