The Sun. — London, England, 1833-03-12 00:00:00

astute (he two countries, waa not so much in . th o t tho u , of the outrages committed, as in the sympathY could otshyPebenPle• Here, when Swing was heard of, he . lad 4, irs,rmeted with some gentleman riding in a . 9. :: an Nand an outrige was followed most generally by s h in e it at a rescue and an affray with the police. of th ba d to his mind so well illustrated the state . Ili': ,"' n trY al the circumstance mentioned by Ina :i 01' "annurable Friend (the Secretary for Ireland) fi: ap peal he had made to the House, of the stoppage It a . a, . _ a lita of the Irel rod Steam Navigation Company. sf ' 1'4 . 41 that the want of employment was the cause t apill'uotadal°rders of Ir eland_—(Hear, hear)—and of whotlat the era( i w aa the Hon. Member for linare-boroeyr,. res sehi ch h's remark, but here was a case of six b' g r _ forr a i Were s topped on the canal, and the per!ori! we n e op end 'a leave theni, under threats of losing their lives th i e tan,, l Y; The consequence was, that property to f ar ,i., NlO,OOO/. was left to deteriorate and be destroyed, eren Lytha.peroPle Would not work at moving the barges, even ral e .,4 ' 4, 4 of double wages. Concession w it tdp,, W as lovely in all our nature, and delig a b n t a ful,, f n ro T a thite.'"e effects; but he doubted whether concession of ih44 trould insure the continuance of the navigation ht to hetae.l4l.---( Hear. ) It was said that poor laws g ( p,,,,,i nr !'en to Ireland he could not then enter ito that tbowi ` - he had nothing to say against favour poor iaws, but ofih Prr haps at A proper time have much to say in _ .... bigt:4; bin in the present state of Pat liamentary andAl o l ,. ilhe'l:lhu'iness, he should be sorry to tell the peoplecon? tart a - ,, n Y to wait for relief till the Parliament cs old ° Tit t ,r 4 l !tt' for Ireland. The Bill, he said, was a rne e as_u_re . cLl 'e it ° p' ea.' and nothing hut necessity coot r and tl 'da . Il e did not pleda himself to all its detarls, and t C 'IQ f a• principles and tirr an , orget ma attachment to the wish-d to 1 '6; 1 ' 44 of constitutional freed , m ; but he w ro. Pett y 1"I'w efficient for the protection of life a° t p was tort(i d for tlas redress of injoriea and wroncs !. 1 ,..a,., _ h 4 4' of the Government to secure the bumble ths l it : theitrittaiet and peaceable posoresaion of their hearEo,a l 4° P l 4 4l"t "ths fle did not believe that the heir mo li fi sh tl iarr e i ' u d in this Bill any cause to weaken their f those ttitsti,4i„,,the .Ministers. They right y loil , l'd " , %vio l " Whrch required it. He did not doubt the goor tli at 7 l. at the Miuisters towarda Iteland, nor coult i l sh he s deny into ' 14 4'7: '''aa a necertaity to carry those good wishes these prepera •ecuton. He was qui e ready to I , ll ate h .' s ° the Alinistry, because he was con i c inceedi lea s ha o t f 111.,,„„t ".°lvere the most ready to uphold the prin p d. Y were I strenuous i n conten mg I g , a 4t - arivsys the most They were only doing a:,°srehy and in preserving r rder.re . an d if thel, had was right in moving for this tad ha?tot moved for it. they wool I have niea m d u_ e . g r e t n ' h e e r i a n ns i d ,e , I N %II is °4l l not have felt that attachment f t ilil i ,,,, u aPpy to feel. The most h••nes• and ' best friends t ats, - Y were always; the most studious! to repress out , le r' D fi r th ' most resolute to uphold order. ti i, • - a ...., regretted that ''•,' -kc'K.Npv the Noble Lord, the Nat 4trn 'nt of Carlow Lord Duncannon) wa o s not il l hi e Lora'vll"l he had presented some petitions, r . the alWould have been convinced that the people t :Ij'Yend e Y W ere p - aceable. Up to the last month it had 4'''ath "I'llaarative tran uillity. The I.\ o r e Lord said t-tsii:afd lately. heard s q ome reports much disturbances, but 'at with. opinion that they were much exaggerated, and h id n,a nninth there was but o o ne h o , u o t h rage of an ag -1) Carlow ~,,q 4,,e,, riettracter.—(He,.ir, hear; into it. 44150,.: let tell the Whitefeet had penetrateddid t t44l , 1 , 4 and the country gentlemen . not prevent S r - 1, 6 Y e alne from the neighbouring farthing counties till its h: a r e ed the rit ' •er, and they did not care one . t 4hreplver which took them over the bridge.--(Grea 4t Natf ) The Hon Member then proceeded to argue 'titr te ngth, th .apathy • tre fr i„ . at the perform their other of magistrates, anti the l oti 4 , 6 , " tt of the police to patrol or . 'l 4, 11,4 d caused the spread of Whitefootism into Car tito , °ri, the relation ie o of the details into which the 41altatdA"ettihe'r entered, '' ' l s tiri - ' 50,1 frequent peals of merriment broke forth from ailall. Nortvere the much allayed whets the observa tio rr begged the attention of the House to his . Hon. ally and a_ . 114le 1 '',ously assured it that no single . on t. e— e s n es o s r h e ,o v_en ,illa hoe°,cluent speeches delivered . through n N"'jell he I'und, in knowledge or Judgment, equal to that aa r . would presently unfold. As an instance ex o a f Eg th e e . n t alta iato_, which petty off e nces in Carlow were . Pr4on ureadful crimes, the Hon. Gentleman said that 4t atel ' aecused b • one Ann Magee, had be tt e r n ane r , eP b r e e - - t4atehsLth'Perpetr),itor of a most horrible en , cm.. flirauseih4clt aeooperl out the eye i s ie o b f a . a ge d leave to correct ) 1 :-,.f..... o l• er for some time.) blind horse.— I Th e t he 0 , 1 , 4 eye was quite blind—(Shouts— .? "a Iv 'r e ye was little better.— . 4glitste.. °T,atta_stnuffered no injury for the evidence which she r .s. trig A . ' onths after:however, she was taken up 0 1 4 Rtiv' e l i e t ° the hay -tick of the Magistrate before whom I,4°,talace3 °l*(trtnation. In the county of Carlow, he knew 1 4d Poli, °I Which men who were engaged as half-and a 14 ' 4 ' ."1"1 to preserve the public peace, wete s t . he n fi d r a s y t tmaringlthafe .outra g es. These men were paid ''' ; a :a t , ' ti la e ir ttro c e of their . employment, and do . uhtless they i i ,, , ri t ii , ~ cOunt . in keeping still ran h ig h s i . the county in a state the t ' a 'loa , ' tra nquillity. Party . feeling . Act would cause it t o h utet a " t he powers given bai 4i t 5%. with additional ranc in ou ti . "s Let those who dared do tlit,4last the wishes of toe landlords beware of r et o l i 'Y visite (fl ar ) He o t i b le e c n ted suff l e 7 , 9 , B d. .... 4 H A e . 14iZ11'.t)41,,..1,11: i nsulta e wh ' ich femal r e e s c kribs:,(Aliantir,ehavas one fact more that he wishr d to me i n to that House had (e : l i i i 4 th e „,_'• •) .A petitioner . i,, , ,,tt h e _ ,oantier in which his house haul been entered; igih.like lopeswatr standing at the door he saw the troops and :"aeliing—he opened the door. They, however, 4 ' 1, 141 Y bY him and proceeded to sear t ch the th se e n hn a u s s a e ''' 11 0 0 " ;'' vl"lent mann ' • r. He told them tlra Ore?', l sl ' iri the house who had been recently confined. ta:ttlieyhaghter.) He entreated thern . not to alarm her, h a ' tri • C`° no attention to his entreat s r i e w s k and not con the bed and IsC la a 'N ' el ling about the ~ ,, l r li 1. „ a niost indecent inarin r er. 'm, (Rocrs of laughter, Z n t ' 4. l e ,:; ithet.continued at shrt , i i n d t — r , , r s y s. als throughout the ) It might be a t4 a tect f„ 0 1 Hon. Gentleman's address.) e4.rtothill lau ghter to the House, but he assured them i ' l 'a th , g nad on farmer occasions so much . tended to f: '4l t4 04' :tihdgnation of the people of Ireland as the brutal .. 4411 t f -"' Part 0 f t h e an i i ii.,, and police li t o o n wa G rd e s nt t i n:_ t4t,e;'? ' 4 % tti,hat country. _(A laugh.) '! rb instances of the et: t 44 lt 4 i" Proceeding to relate Deere tvi,, 4 the county of Carlow, someho had received se o'lat,ihtoe,,,%°:°,ney of the Government, but his statements I :41 ' the coughing heatnd norse made by Hon. Ito boa 'th continued till oncluded. hs, „eolo)et,`ANNON had laid some, countyreturns before the of Car low, 4' , D 7 ni ell it ,' "4 w ith the '" ate of t"e l and previous to ts„,• '"tth er th e Peared, that since Y i Peeed'mPutuber of Whiteloo j t u ou:rages returned did 04,- til l e• - : o r 60. In December last there were h l e I d 3 i d (It'YP 4 o ar .' <0; ad in February, which return he was t::, " ' h en he last spike on the sulr, rar aY there was some diminutron, name's, 146. Itit!l i ) 44 .) Ti, were all serious offences cowing 146. that 4 11, 5 1. , These of „,iiiret,,,y,sin. He admitted,,... oi l Pilai n. , r illummarion w verystrong, and led to . ottrra k . rt, !),,,b ',,1 feellll2 11 1t1y,4 sides. During 'a l st elec6on, a m-dical ni ti an is i l .t ,: ii ttee ti at it he th v e med for Mr. B v, la te ke fi n t e r y, biot - , his c , ffin. tie I: 1 ip.'tiqtlii' 4: X e t ll ni p g r b e t p h r e e wast pulled off his hor.e, and thrown from the Irish Alembers.) r,ttra ::tiver•—(lll-"' hear, Dr. Doyle, and th ,`-ith4l'ttell al so , that the it fluerwe of . 1 %1 , ' h' l ' Pries•s had kept his criunt quiet till 11-cembt-r , proved to - jar ,Zthe fact of their exertions having filled , kr : "tmely the neer ssrty for . increa . seu p Avers. ti'l'ail. I,I'NNCEI Tr ratted that his Alaresty'a Ministers ''''' II l ie la • g illeeli to luting for •t and such a Inca .; l ' l C ' P e tliall en I"( al 1 • Y Without tilt actedinquiry, Why did they not ac in 1819, when they ralled on the Ministers N I day to , • . „. 2,....( Hear, hear.) They t t ,, n 't th i , l, ~ Pr.ye their t a , . 41 14, 44 . li ` 4 ve .ati.fi e d the i•num' y w t_bat . t . be , ); , h_ricl souse D,,wati, a 'lt what had they done i.o e C ` , : i t roy L: l 7: Loh, 'f.t 4 t d ° l t klktiny, Westmeath, ► Queen's. i the 'Sihit ltdd'lt) :::, I 'nk, and from the testimorm a o ed he might 4Viig ''ll4l,'-,..stt°wn) on Friday haqs MN' 4,4',;,nority, Were in a state l o ie f . s r:l i i p -t p u n i s bance. But thei r t‘ : 41 'nd sweeping measure like this r t o o ve b d e h ir ia p l - i but „Ne, P , ttial ,vil, They had . on y . p of o..me, had , 0 Y h ; They had proved tic exist , oce i t°l4,TlNti;* Nimeted that fact with another, llatten w ip bi . ch Peti.t" the t° do with it, without at . 0. t .' 11 7 . exact4l;k tLee°nnection. The Ministers, instead to t r l not S t lb t '` ) k it Lok, ought to impeach themselves for j l '"V t Wirt 3 ,''d he referred ' to the speech of the tiodage haikaari /li°4l Assize s in proof of it. It Clare, the l \l"h en i.di °''"trtrrion, the Ministry admitted that ; Gal -° itZ lbty tuckUeeul in putting the law into execution. tio ''st • qfice two • ra ago they found England . ~, aal , a lst ijrh , yea', then app ly fir addi yid the tiers ? eg, state ; dd th e t and wi y th 4t • 0 y not • I \ o , they put the law in force, ; Jahrie glve . it a trial in Ireland ? They complained,,,.. Ar or , e Was bt % 76 att er , i In Teded in Clorrmel. Why, out of 160 gre4r4ting dread( ' lel, and that at a time when the cholera a rt a t :ha I he ll Y, and the fear of infection was vet always y tith e - :e when """lies, too, knew that they were _ coavitt!sea. l i t 'ea' did attend, especially in Crown and riek,,ht'°nia,l°t even here they succeeded in obtaining a t rials . 4 ,0 a,4',,°st every ease. With regard to the Car lde‘,ta th e - 4 the facts were that there were three the Ilii i ri i 4 11, "t there was a failure in the proof of Xcelleni't th i e . " I 'l t ry °° d the witness broke down ; and in founded c ' i tatt gav e 'Le accustd the benefit of a most 0 ° thi t .!r• What argument then could be Ill eY Illight as well say that jurors would not do their ditty in England because a jury acquitted Watson. He sate no reason for superseding the trial by Jury. There were reasons for strengthening the existing laws, no doubt ; hut there were no reasons for abolishing them. He contended that Hon. Member., it England were placed under the same circumstances as Ireland now is, would not vote for those severe measures which were now considered indispensable. His Majesty's Ministers were willing to extend their remedid measures to Belgium, hut they did not appear to be equally anxious to remedy the grievances of Ireland—a country in many respects placed in similar circumstances. They had in troduced remedial measure;, it was true, in connection with their coercive measures ; but they took care to give the latter the precedence; and what pledge did they give. if the coercive measures were carried, that the remedial measures would also be carried ? The Government of Ireland had hitherto teen conducted on a partial system. They were now about to add another sanguinary law to the long catalogue of oppressions exercised upon the Irish people. Mr. TALBOT should not have trespassed upon the time of the House, if his name had not been particularly alluded to by the Hon. and Learned Member for Dublin. He denied that he had been actuated by any interested mo tive in the conduct which he had pursued. (The Hon. Member, it was understood, alluded to the observations of Mr. O'Connell in a published letter of his, in which lie recommended the parties whom he address-d to take care of young Tilhot, of Athlone.) Without further preface he would enter on the subject of the debate. He was compelled to admit that his Alajesty's Ministers had made out their case, and that they had showed the necessity of having recourse to these extraordinary measures which they had proposed. There was only one pint stated on the pact of Memb-rs on the oppi site side of the House. with which he could agree ; ..nd that was the fact stated by the Iron. Member for Kilkenny—that as crime in creased the number of commitials decreased. A better proof there could net be of the system of intimidation which had existed in Ireland. Misgovernment aft' irded fond for agitation, and agit ition, on the other hand, gave ri•e to unconstitutional measures of Government. At the same time he would not pledge himself to every detail of the Bill. He object d to domicili cry visits as a horrib e ahuse ; he denounced arbitrary imprisonment as unneces sary. With regard to courtsmartial, if he (M-. Talbot) were to be tried for his life, lie would as soon be tried by a couttrnartial as by any other 'ribunal in Ireland. What ever doubt, however. he might have about predial tun, no doubt c. u'd he entertained relative to political a a itation, the object of which was to crush all individual opinion. It had been asked by the opnenents of the Mi nter, rial measure, whether the Members who supported that nieasure would support a similar proposition with respect to England. His answer was that he certainly should, and he believed that other Memlers would do so liltewise. Mr. CHARLES GRANT said it had been taken for granted (particularly by the Hen. Member for Newport) that when a district was once proclaimed by the Lord Lieutenant, then courtsmartial wire to be immediately established. But that did not follow. On the contrary, it was provided that there should be a gradation in the degree of coercion, and that the uttniist degree of it would never be applied until the inferior ones had been found to fail. Domiciliary vi-its were first to be adopted, and if they were successful there would be no necessity whatever for courtsmartial. It had been an old argument of his (Mr. C Grant's) that when a deviation front the strict cou se authorized by the Constitution became necessary, that deviation ought to he so distinct, and so e ell marked, that no danger could ever arise of its ever bring drawn into a precedent. If it were intended to make any en croachment upon the Constitution, the proper course would not certainly be to make a glaring deviation from its principles, but to make a slight and almost imper. ceptible change at first, and to proceed by degrees to overthrow the whole fabric. It was therefore his opinion that if it were necessary to deviate from the Constitution, the line of demarcation ought to be so distinct, that there should be no danger of their proceedings ever being mis- .aken for a constitutional measure. He, therefore, con. tended that it was a wise and just principle, when it was necessary to deviate from strict law, to adopt a course so widely departing from the usual line of proceeding, that it should be totally impossible ever to mistake the one for the other. It was admitted on all hands that danger existed, and he congratulated the House on the unanimity which existed on that point. It was admitted that a case of extreme danger arose from predial agitation ; but the Hon. Mem ber for Newport contended that political agitation had nothing to do with predial agitation. But what was the meaning of that soft, mild term, predial agitation? It meant all that system of crime, all that cowardly course of aggression on unoffend , ng individuals, which spread de solation through Ireland. Under the soft and flowery term of predial agitation, bad been included all those hor rible outrages which had revolted the feelings of this House, and which a Christian country had rarely seen. With respect to political agitation, its objects were not the improvement of Ireland; its objects were inconsistent with the integrity and prosperity of the British empire. Those who were at all acquainted with Ireland knew that there was generally in some or other part of the country a❑ in surrectionary spirit—.a species of smothered combustion ; if to this incipient fire were added any additional and par ticular pressure arising out of the conduct of a landlord, or even of a clergyman, the flame broke out, and predial agitation began. In the present state of that country it w.is impossible to distinguish between political and predial agitation ; they arose out of the same elements, were fed with the same fuel, produced the same resentments, and errtp . oyed the same weapons, though, perhaps, of different temper. It was out of the question to suppose, therefore, that they should not mutually re-act ; and it there really were no connection between them, vi by was credit taken by political agitators for allaying predial agitation ? (Cheers.) But to revert to the nature of the tribunal by winch criminals were to he tried. Some Hon. Members objected to courtsmartial, but, as had heen already justly remarked, who had been able to point out a fit and adequate substitute? Other plans bad been talked of, but, in his mind, they were all more objectionable than the proposi tion in the Bill. One had suggested barristers; another judges; and a third magistrates. As to barristcro, did nut every body know that a strontz, prejudice would exist against them on the ground ttat they would be anxious to please Ministers by producing convictions? To the suggestion for appointing judges, the Hon. Member for Dublin had himself replied in his speech upon the address at the opening of the session, when he ass, rted that the people had no confidence in the Irish Bench. If such were the fart, how could the Irish Bench properly carry the Act into execution ? He (Mr. C. Grant) thought, how ever, that there tv,s another, and a much juster objection to the employment of judges—it wa• that they ought never to be cadet' upon to act at the ass;z s without the assist ance of a jury, and without the sacred and dignified ac comp Aliments of their station. To altar this system was without a precedent, and would ei rrairily have a bad ff: c• upon the people. Tue third suggestion was, ttat tie trials ought to be left to -he magi•araey ; but of msgismitis the Hon. and Learned Member for Dublin had also dispowi 11 the first debate of tt e session; and what owcries would not be raised, it Ministers listener to this proposition, tot thr wine the people of Ireland into the hanOs of th. Orange magistracy ?—(Cheers.) This is as the very ev,l the court martial wee erected to avoid. The Hon. Member for Newport (Mr Hawkins) had made a fourth and a still more extr tordinary proposal; he b di contended that Engliso lawyers should be employed to by criminal• for Irish murders. Such a proceeding would indeed konne the national hatred ; the people of Ireland had already been told that the English w. re their enemies; and would it not be belt) out by the agitators—this declaimets against the S.ssenag, —as the completion ut he de k radation of their coutoty that Saxon Irwyets 11.1. ',et. broiler t over Lo pronounce upon the d estinies i f the Irish?—(Cheers.) The Right I-lon. Gentleman went on to argue, that although the present measure might not lie carried into effect, it was stir) n. cessary, and might he most useful in detetting from crime; he believed tt.at the attitude already taken by Parliament, and the de ermina tion shown to put down re e lion had struck terror into the hearts of the agitators.—(hear, hear.) In his opinion it was one great merit of the Bill that the employment of it was lett to the discretion of the Lord Lieutenant, and tt would be a praise to the measure and an honour to those who brought it in if it were found nor necessaty to carry it into execution. It had been said, that Ministers were governed by party motives, and that they had intro duced this Bill to answer political purposes : It was not by any means the first time that the intentions of public men had been impugned ; but he ventured to assert that the Bill rested upon public gtounds only, and that it did not originate in sordid or p.rty views. Upon the same principle the Betorm Bill had been introduced, and upon that principle it had been carried. Ministers thought that the existing danger, if not repressed, would not only desilate Ireland but peril the existence of the empire. Whether the Bill were received with applause or censure, its promoters were resolved to keep their course. Mi nisters were responsible, and what they deemed their duty, that they would perform, and with the blessing of God, the Empire which they received from their predecessors compact and united they would deliver to their successors one and undivided. In addition to the approbatittn of their own consciences, they hoped to meet the approb lion of the general body of the iuhabitants of the United Kingdom. Howerer anxious Ministers were to maintain peaonal freedom, they wore resolved to prckerve the in tegrity of the empire, and to remain true to the great principles which ought to govern British Statesmen. Mr. LALOR spoke amid the expression of great impa tience on the part of the House, and argued that all the accounts from Ireland received by Ministers, and which were employed as the foundation for this Bill, had be e n most crossly exaggerated. In the county he re presented (Queen's County), he could safely assert that cr i me had been magnified five hundred fold.—(Question ; Hear.) If an opportunity were afforded, he pledged him- self to prove that persons had been employed to seduce the lower orders, and to promote agitation, in order to form a foundation for the Bill.—(Question.) The interrup tions here became so loud and frequent, that the Hon. M-mher moved the adjournment of the debate. Mr. COBRETT seconded the motion. Colonel DA VIES said it was for the House to decide whether it would submit to be thus constantly bullied_ (Loud cheers)—whether it would thus, night after night be insulted, because Hon. Gentlemen thought they were not sufficiently attended to, or their talents properly ap• preciated.—(Continued cheering.) They were now ar rived at the eighth night of a debate on the principle of a question, and the Hon. Member would further prolong it because, forsooth, his abilities were not bowed down to; thus neglecting the whole business of the House, and the whole business of the country.—(Loud cheers.) Ile could only s iy, if the Noble Lord cle,se to sit till that time the following evening, he would stay with him. Mr. F. O'CONNOR did not exactly know what the last Hon. Speaker meant. He begged to say that all the patience was on his side the House; tram it there had been no interruption whatever—all was attention, calmness, and respect. Lord ALTHORP should have been exceeding glad if the Hon. Member had b , -en allowed to conclude; but he must sty, he felt it to be absolutely his dory to resist-- (Loud cheers) —any further adjournrnent.—(Hear.) Mr. M. O'CONNELL hoped some allowance would he tad tor the feeling It i•th Members could not but entertain on this vital question. Mr. LALUR would not press his motion. Mr. M. O'CONNELL cnti'd not allow this Bill to go Further than the second readlng without entering his pro , est against it. In bringing in their B;11 on the subject 01 Tithes; in 1831, Ministers had brought in a Bill to create dissension in Ireland—to excite disturbance and encourage ,gitation. The Hon. Member, amidst continued interrup iion, proceeded to d fend the proposition of the Hon. llember for N..wpcirt, for sending over English lawyers in substitution for courtsmartial. Hnw many of their Judges had h•en English lawyers? How many of their Chancellors? And yet there never was known to be any irejudice against them. The Hon. Gentleman, who had been listened to most impatiently, and •wag imperfectly ,eard in the gallery, sat down ami ist li•uil and almost •intnimous cries of " Quit ion," " Divide," &c. The House then divid d. For the Second Reading 363 Against it Bl Majority —27l • • • • A conversation then took place as to the day on which *he Bill was to be committed ; and it was appointed for Wednesday. Mr. HALL gave notice that in the Committee he should move as an amendment to the 9th clause, " That the Lord Lieutenant should not have the power of interposing his veto against meetings taking place for the purpose of pe titioning Parliament, and other legitimate ohjects." The other orders of the day were then disposed of, and the House adjourned at half-past one. SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. Lord Althorp brought in, last night, the Bill to alter and amend the laws relating to the tem poralities of the Church of Ireland, which was read a first time. On his Lordship announcing that the Bill would be printed and in the hands of Members this day, and that, as the prin ciple of the Bill would not require long consi deration, he saw no reason why the second reading should not be fixed for Wednesday, a violent clamour arose among the Conservatives, against the alleged indecent haste with which he was pressing the measure. We perceive that the Conservatives are preparing for a vigorous fight. Mr. Sergeant Lefroy contended that more time ought to be allowed for the consideration of the principle of a Bill which involved the very ex istence of the Established Church of Ireland ; and Colonel Conolly, improving upon Mr. Sergeant Lefroy, contended that not only the welfare, but the very existence of the Church, and of the Monarchy itself, was involved in the principl e of the Bill. Lord Althorp offered to compromise matters, by fixing the second read ing for Thursday ; but this delay would not appease his opponents. It is quite clear, that if some measures of a remedial and conciliatory character do not proceed part passe with the Coercive Bill, the latter may produce some very unpleasant effects. It is, therefore, of the very utmost importance that the Bill regarding the Church shall pass into a law with as little delay as possible. The Conservatives, on the other band wish to push the Coercive Bill, and to delay the other as much as possible. By aiding Ministers with the Coercion Bill, and prevent ing the passing of other measures, they think they will be able to put Ministers in what is familiarly termed a cleft stick. However the instinct of the majority will save them from vacillation at a crisis like the present. On a division the motion was carried by a majority of 187 to 46, so that the second reading will take place on Thursday. We honestly confess that we are not displeased at seeing the Tories appear in their old factious character. Nothing injured Ministers so much as the aid of the Conservatives. It is almost impossible to avoid having a suspicion that there must he something wrong in any policy which is so heartily approved of by men who entertain so cordial a hatred of all improvement, and who cling so pertinaciously to all abuses. Ministers, however, by their promptitude in fixing on Thursday for the second reading of the Bill for the Reform of tile Irish Church, have put the sincerity of Sir Robert Peet's desires for the pacification of Ireland to the test. They should yield not a jot o n this point to the Conservatives. The cloven foot was sufficiently visible last ni g ht, and we can easily foresee that tile Conservatives will fight a. stoutly for every impurity in the Irish Church as they did for schedules A and B. Old Sarum was not of more vital importance to the Constitution than the retention of every one of the sinecure bishoprics of the sinecure Church of Ireland. However, by persevering. it) their course of improvement—by probing the wounds of Ireland —by freeing corporation , from the abuses which have placed them hostility to the nation, they will receive a support which will mote than compensate for the hosti lity of the Conservatives. To divide against Sir Robert Peel is to preserve their own family from disunion. There may he differences of opinion among the best-intentioned with regard to the extent of remedial measures, and the period for urging them ; but when an enemy at the gates, opposed to all impioveinent, these differences will be forgotten. The Conserva tives, on their way home last night (for a nu.nber of them instantly left the House in dudgeon after the division) were loud in their invectives against Ministers. We defy them.—Morning G'hron• At a time when civil justice in Ireland is about to surrender her scales and sword into the hands of military power, it may seem like 3 mockery to talk of a projected Reform of the Irish Jury system ; nevertheless, as the question has been brought under the notice of Parlia ment by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, concurrently with the Bill for establishing mili tary tribunals, it may he worth while t o sa y a few words on the subject. If the scarlet coat of armed authority is ever again to be displaced by the judicial ermine, it will be of great portance to the future peace and welfare of Ire land, that the machinery of the Constitutional Courts should be so far improved as to inspire the people with greater confidence than they ever yet have had in the pure and impartial adminis tration of justice. It is difficult to treat of any question touching the Reform of civil institu tions in Ireland without entangling it with poli tical considerations. In that country, for cen turies past, the administration of justice has been made but too subservient to party feelings and political purposes, to allow even the Jury system to be discussed on its own merits, free from the disturbing influence of party excite ment or the taint of political prejudice. Yet next to giving the people of Ireland regular employment, or a well contrived system of poor laws, is the necessity of so remodelling the institutions of justice, that the abuses which have prevailed ever since the Eng lish l a ws were introduced into that country, met. , not continue to be among those grievances which make a " repeal " of the Union popular. In the recent charge of Baron Smith to the Grand Jury at the Assizes of Louth he highly eulogised the sound judgment and discretion with which the Sheriff for the time being always exercises his power in constituting the paunch from which the petty juries for the trial of cri minal cases are selected. He praised the system itself in all its parts. It is a system, however, which although standing high in the estimation of Irish judges, and lauded by law officers of the Crown as one of the best of all possible con trivances, is certainly not the jury system of the British Constitution. We would separate this subject from politics altogether—and, looking at the construction of juries as merely part and parcel of the judicial system, we ask on what urinciples of fair dealing or impartiality is it that the Crown exercises the power in Ire land of setting aside jurors almost without limitation as to number, while in capital felony, where the life of the prisoner is at stake, he can peremptorily challenge no more than twenty? Such a practice, which is in contra vention of all notions of equal justice, as well as a violation of the principles of British law, of itself sufficient proof of the imperfection of the jury system in Ireland. It would not be dif ficult, we think, in any case of tteason or felony, where the Crown was anxious for a conviction, to wield this power of making all jurymen " stand by" who might not be thought subservient enough, in such a way as to secure, from a panne! of two or three hundred names, twelve Caen more ready to do the sanguinary work of a bad Government than to observe the sanctity of their oaths, or respect the lives or liberties of their fellow-citizens. Let us only imagine such a monstrous power claimed by the Crown in England, as that which in one instance stated by Mr. O'Connell, set aside 132 jurors without showing cause, and would it not be received as an attempt to reduce the people of England to the lowest state of civil bondage and debase ment ? If the Union is to be realised, such degrading distinctions must cease to exist.— Morning Herald. We insert a letter indicative of considerable dissatisfaction among military men at the recent appointment of a " very young" Major-General to the 97th Regiment, in whose favour it appears that several distinguished officers (a list of 15 is given, and many others, we believe, might be added) were passed over by the Commander-in- Chief. Now, when we state that Sir Henty Hardinge has been the fortunate officer on this occasion, few will suppose that we have any design to underrate or disparage his pretensions. Sir Henry is reputed among those who know him to be as brave. A soldier as ever fought, and has been grievously wounded in the service. He is also a man of more than average general talent, a vigorous, diligent, and active public servant, though, with all deference be it spokes, not the very wisest or most liberal of living states men. In fact, Sir Henry Hardinge is a Tory of the deepest hue, and so is Lord Fitzroy Somerset, Military Secretary to the C o mmander-in-Chief, and not unfrequently supposed to enact the part of " Viceroy over" Lord Hill, his nominal chieftain. This Noble Secretary's Tory sympathies, of which his Lordship is accused of having many, may, per haps, have forgotten, for the sake of Sir H. Hardinge, that so many older officers, some of whom had seen as much fire, and with as much sang froid (more cannot be said), as he had, were no less unprovided for than Sir Henry. In a military point of view this is hardly fair. Perhaps, however, it may be said that Sir H. Hardinge had filled (and none, we acknowledge, filled more worthily) two political situations, viz., that of Secretary at War, and Chief Secre tary in Ireland. But we have never heard that the military privilege of superseding senior offi • cers was the fit reward for such descriptions of civil service. Upon the whole, this no+nination snacks of partiality. Had Sir If nry Hardinge himself been Commander-in-Chief or Military Secretary, we are sure that no such promotion would, or could, have taken place.— Times. PROGRESS OF THE SESSION. (Foirn the Sprctator ) That the proceedings of the It-formed House of Commons have hi , herto disc :pointed general ex oectai ion, is undeniable. I is difficult to meet wilt) any person, neither a trimming Goo-ersative nor a Mutister ial tool, who bolds a (Wei ent language. That • his would bet he case as respects a very nutnerous holy of sanguine and somewhat visionary politicians, such :Awe to be found in all t It - nes and in almos. all countrie., we clearly foresaw and f-retold. Bur the feel:tig of disappointment to which we allude, is I:Ci of that unreasonable nature, or confined to those who ex. petted to receive an almost ins , anianeous and mira culous cure, a , the hands of tl4e Reformed Parliament, tort he evils occasioned by (Pal urn- s of mi-go,ertinietit. Sensible and clear-lvadjd men, well affected t 0.% ds LA Grey and his colleagues, and anxious to make the best of things as they are, do not hesitate to declare their dissatisfaction at the little progress which has been made in effecting real good for the country since the opening of the session. The 2, c f, o u t s a t i. lg l i ,tiii (and who can deny the justice of such complaints?) that the disease of talking, and the re luctance to work, which is indicated by it, is d S. prevalent in the new House of Commons, Just as it was in the old : there is scarcely a man actively engaged in life, as merchant, manufacturer, or agricul , urisr, whose operations are not p ,ralysed at the present moment by want of information as to the intentions of Government, and the ap,,rehen sion, apparently but too well grounded, that all practical measures will be indefinitely postponed till the session closes. Meanwhile, the " abstract principle" of sinecures is upheld; and millions of taxes are imposed in thin Houses, without even the . meagre p retence w hi c h t h e s p eec h o f a Ch an c e ll o r o f the Exchequer has usually furnished our represeA tatives for their votes on such questions. Five long rights have been occupied by the Lish Suppression Bill already ; and we suppose their is NO human being so sanguine as to expect that it will be passed justito in dulge himself ethel;as t e r II ally this prospect fies the g rum bli ng w hi c h J o h n B u ll i s b eg im,,"g solemn promises madewtohelniimhedurtuinugli'tlahteelatsoeneltelc'e- Vow. But it is not in the character of English men of the present day to think lightly "of tl,• pledges of politicians. Some of the Members have.' been made sensible of this fact since the division on Mr. Hume's sinecure motion. Their constituents have very earnestly, and very properly, called them to account fi , r their votes on that occasion. Scarcely one of those votes was given by a Member for a populous town or district, except in direct violation of a promise, which is most clearly remembered by the men who demanded it. The people, who almost expected, as A matter of course, to be laughed at and cheated by the Membt rs of the rotten borough Parliaments, are plainly determined to be cheated no longer; but, on the contrary, have adopted the inconvenient notion that an electioneering promise, expressed or implied, is as sacred as any o t her. It is, to be sure, a very disagreeable thing to be f or ced to resign on account of forfeited pledges. No pains, therefore, will be spared to avoid being placed in the predicament of fulfilling them, or being turned out of Parliament for their non-fulfilment. To such men, the Irish diversion, which affords so much talking to so little purpose in the House, is a perfect godsend. Many persons believe that Minis ters and their majority are thus playing into each others hands,—that long debates upon questions not immediately connected with that horrible thing retrenchment are encouraged, in order that the public may be excited, amused, and tricked into a belief that their representatives are laboriously em ployed; while the real object of all this worthless discussion is to kill time, and stave off the considera- tion of practical measures, which are not equally agreeable to Ministers and to the people. This manoeuvre—if such a course has really been in tended—will fail. Tne present session may be lost to business, but it will have gained for us a com?lete insight into the characters of men who have hitherto worn masks, audit will have prove)l the efficiency of deficiency of the " final mea,ure." In the mean while we recommend that the example, so pertinently se' us by our brother electors in the north, should be immediately and extensively adopted. In that case, we may venture to anticipate, even in the present session, a different result to Mr. Hume's next econo mical motion. (From the News.) The C immon Council of the City of London have rejected the motion, brought forward by a few Saints in that body, to petition Parliament on th. subject of that first-rate humbug—at present in course of concoltion—by Sir Andrew Agnew, and a few others like him—to prevent people from pur suing their amusements, and avocations, where they are compelled to do the latter, on the Sabbath. This con piracy against the recreations of the poor has been tlefetiied ; as we trust it will be also in the House of Commons, should the busy meddling per sons who are stirring in it be foolish enough to in troduce it into Parliament. We have long since, and frequently, exposed this hypocritical absurdity; and it gives us satisfaction to find our views so fully supported and borne out by a majori►y of the re presentatives of the freemen of the first city of the empire.* It was well remarked on this occasion, when those who came forward in the Common Council to advocate the cause of the saints had abandoned the religious part of their scheme, that the only remaining motive they could have had was a mercenary one. This is undeniable :if those who wish to put a stop altogether to Sunday trading are influenced by conscientious motives alone, they will not hesitate to close their shops, whether others do so or not; and if they keep them open because others do, what becomes of their conscience ? It yields to .vhat is clearly with them a matter of higher consideration—self-interest. It sickens the heart to see in these days, when common sense is beginning to have some influence on men's actions, that such hollow and deceitful pretenders can find honest (simple, in a double sense, they must be also COI, sidered) men to take up their hypocritical schemes in Parliament. * The hypocrisy of these people is well proved by the corn. promises they are willing to make with their own consciences ; for instance, we dare say that Messrs. Williams, Pewtress, &c., do not object to write letters on the Saturday to their country correspondents, advising them of bills drawn or goods sent, though they know that those letters travel and are de. , . livered on the Sabbath. Nor do they object to receive orders from the country on the Monday, though they know to a moral certainty that the letters containing them were written on the Sabbath. The truth is, they are-offended at the poor man's recreation, because their interest is not connected with it. Let these fanatics stop the mails, and place the whole kingdom under a seventh day's interdict, and they would soon be amongst the loudest to complain of the effects. ARMY PENSIONS.— A Royal warrant, bear ing date the 7th of February, 1833, has been published by order of the House of Commons. It says that a soldier enlisted for unlimited service cannot demand his discharge as a matter of right, either with or without a pension ; but discharge may be granted—l st, on account of incapa• city for further service ; 24, in consequence of reduction of the military establishments ; 3d, as an indulgence, upon certain conditions. Permanent pensions—the scale for wounds in action :—First degree,—men able to contribute towards earning a livelihood, although rendered by wounds unfit for the ordinary duties of a soldier, private 6.1. to 9d., corporal 9,1. to Is., sergeant Is. to Is. 6d. Second degree, men rendered incapable by wounds of earning a livelihood, hut not requiring the aid of another person ; private Is., corporal Is. 4d., sergeant Is. 10d. Third degree, men losing two limbs, or both eyes, from wounds, or being so severely wounded as to be totally incapable of earning a livelihood, and to require the as sistance and care of some other parson ; private Is. 6d. to 25., corporal Is. 10d. to 2s. 4d., sergeant 2s. 6d. to 3s. Forfeiture of pensions—a soldier forfeits all claim to pen. sion who has been convicted by a courtmartial of the crime of desertion ; of having wilfully maimed himself, or of having tampered with his eyes, or caused a total or partial loss of sight by his vice, intemperance, or other misconduct; of having made, or being privy to the making of any false entry, or of producing auy fraudulent docu ment, either as regards his own services or those of any other person ; and upon a conviction by a court martial. or by a civil tribunal, of any vicious or disgraceful conduct. TRAFALGAR-SQUARE. This square, it finished according to the plan projected, will, it is appre hended, he a very bungling business, occasioned by th pnittusain of the south sole of Sr. M rrtin's workhou too far into the spare intended fur the squ ire. Th. Na'ional Gallery proposed to be er. cred at that side wil be 461 feet in length, and 50 in width ; but in conse yu nee of tin. workhouse, there is not room to erect th. G.llery sufficiently tar bask so as t.i leav an open an , uninterrupted view of the fine portico of St. Martin'. church from Pall-mall East. The Duke of NORTHUSI BERLAND and oilier noblemen and gentlemen are strong') o d posed to the view of the front of the church tieing in . great measure hidden by the erection of the Gall , ry Ssone of the advocates, however, of the plan intended h iv he modesty to depreciate the grand pi rico, and, indeed the church altogether as a specimen of bad archit-c , ur. The church was built according to the plan of Mr. GIBBS, and those wise men who abuse it as a t•uildine, are pro n a idy nor aware that Sir CHRISTOPHER WRVS as•ist. , Mr. GIBBS in his pl.n, and gave him his advice in ev r p.rtieular dining the progress f the building. The en lig.itened cri,ics who abuse it, will pr. b ihly ask who wh• Sir CIi:USTOPHER WREN, and if cid that he was a arehiteet, under whose plan and in•pection St. Paul' cathedral was eucted, in their peculiar vtrit of critic sn. th. y will say, that it is an incon4rtious mass of st.:n bud togeth , r, and disgrace to the British metropolis! LADY STEPNEY'S NOVEL, " THE NE%\ ROAD TO RUIN "...This Work wail certainly he publishe• •ti W. thiesday next, orders sbould therefore be sent imme diately to the various B rok•ellers to insure the delivery ro e ,rly copies. Agents for Sco land, .iliesslS, BELL 2111 , BRADFUTE, Edinburgh ; for Ireland, Mr. JOHN CUM vits , G. Dublin. - - ----- A BIGAMIST BY HIS OW CONFESSION.- The parish officers brought up a worn in to be pa-sed to he maiden settlement, at PArington. It appeared that sli had been regularly married to a master baker, name HECKENBERG, wit., after cruelly treating her, had turn, her out, and refused to maintain her and 11.1 child. 11 being called upon. HECKENBERC justified this re!usal, ti the ground, that at the time he married tier he had anott, %rite living !—and he even furnished the in'tsier ti workhouse with a copy of the certificate of his ularriag• with his first wife ! As the v.ainian was pregnant, an the child might heiniii,e chargeable to Huh, it horn tin the applican's were very anxious to obtain an order lame .fiat ly ; but the magi Crates declined to act, until the' had 1 gal proof ot the first mat riagt., anl of the first wife', existence at the time ot the second marriage ; and, in the event of this being produced, they expressed s hope tha. the heartless and unprincipled husband would he prose cuted by the parish.—Hull Pachet. POLICE INTCLUOENT,E. 0 W-S-71ItEET: INDELICATZ ASSALTLT.—John Manteca, a student of medicine, a young man of respectable appearance, w-a yesterday charged with an indecent assault an Jane Stiff, with intent, &c. Jane Stiff lived in the service of Mrs. Ferguson, of No. Staple'st9h,aton Sunday,lnn b t u h i e ld isndg instant, here thesheprisonerha d occasionlo dged,to g a n d o into his sitting-room, when he shut the door, and drew her towards hint fur the purpose, as he said. of examining is tooth of which she had previously complained, when lie threw her upon the sofa, and attempted to take liber tieslid yesterdaywith her morning,; she screamed—" to eaa d son having k noc k e d at t h e d oor a t th e moment, he let her go tn . She informed h er m i s t ress o f th e circustanee on scrrnsd—" Murder," and some per - Thursday, wh o directed Ler to tell her mother, which she n y d . the defendant was, in come qiience, tak en into cus The defendant denied that there was anything either outrageous or violent in his conduct, and that he hid simply put the complainant on the sofa for the purpose of examining her tooth, at her own request. An attempt was made to prove that the girl had made similar charge at a former lodging-house at which she had lived ; hut on the person coming forward he could not prove that it was the same girl ; and even if he bad, Mr. HALLS observed, as the defendant bad in some re spects admitted the assault, he must End hail, two house keepers in 25/. each, and enter into his own recogni zinces of 50/. to answer the charge at the sessions. To give twenty-four hours' noticed bail. HAT T ON- GARDEN. ATTEMPTED VIOLATION.-Yesterday IV. Ellie, plas terer, aboutSo.was charged under the following circumstan ces :—Mrs. F. Bewley, wife of a respectable cabinet-make-, o:Brook-street,New-road (who appeared to be on tit putt t of hecotning a mother, and about 40), said that on Su - lay ev.ning she was returning home through Red Lion square, from a visit to Mr. Jameson, musical-instrument - maker, of St. John street-square, when the prisoner, perceiving her to be lame, offered her his arm. She refused at first, but on his assuring her that he was a mar ried man, she accepted his assistance. O❑ getting to some empty houses in Wnhurn-square, he insisted upon kissing tier, and on her telling httn to leave her instantly, he grasp-d her round the waist and threw her upon the ground. She screamed "Murder," and a policeman of the E division on coming up found the prim ner in such 3 situation as to leave no douht of his intention.—The prisoner said the prosecutrix asked him to let her walk with him, hut the Magistrates disbelieved him, on the , estimony of Mr. Jameson and others.—The prisoner was fined Five Pounds, and, in default of payment, committed for two months. MARLBORO UGH-STREET. Jaw v. GENTILK.—A gentleman ut the Jewish persurs. sion summoned Peter Jones, the driver of a hackne)- c mch, before Mr. DIM, on Saturday, for having de manded and taken more than his fare. The complainant stated that the defendant took fire persons from Agar -street to the theatre in Tottenham street, without having made any objection or stipulation as to the additional number he carried. Toe defendant demanded Ss. 61. as his fare ; and although cautioned by he complainant against taking the sum, he said he would not take less, and was accordingly paid his demand. The proper fare was Is. 61. ; but in consideration of carrying one more than the licensed number, the complainant said. it was his intention to have given half a crown. The Jarvey, who evidently was quite " sweet" upon his knowledge of the law, gave his master an encour.ging wink, and then begged the Magiatrate to allow him to submit a few "pints" of objection to the case the com plainant had " scored" again:4 him. Certainly, said Mr. DYER, I am willing to bear any thing you can urge in defence. Veil, sail Jarvey, the first pint is, that that 'ere gem. man arn't according to law, to take an oath. Why not? inquired the Magistrate.—'Cause he's a Jew, and don't believe in the Bible, said Jarvey, confidently. Mr. DYER, however, overruled this olojection, by com municating an unexpected piece of information on the •uhject. Then your Vorship, said Jarvey, the second pint is, that I carried more than the riglar number in my wehiele, and !n course I'm entitled to a heitra summat. Where do you find a law for that ? inquired Mr. DyEa. It formerly was so, but in the new Act it has been pur. posely omitted. The defendant, with a look of huge dismay, acknow ledged that the worthy Magistrate had cleared up the " pints" in a totally unexpected way, and, therefore, be was willing ti throw, himself on the merciful considera , tion of the court. The mitigated fine of 10s. hiving been inflicted and aid, Jarvey left the office muttering, "Yell, I was for 'mancipating on 'em afore this, but it they satyrs us out in witch a vay now, vot vont they do arterwards; an I'm blowed if I don't wote agin it." THAMES POLICE. A NORTH COUNTRY SWINDLER.-Yesterday John Turner, ao elderly war!, formerly master of a ship in the coal trade, was charged with defraucing several licensed victuallers. Mr. 11.11antine, landlord of the Golden Anchor, Wap. ping, said that a fortnight ago the prisoner represented himself to him as Master of the Margaret, a collier, of North Shields, and as having been robbed of all his pocket-money at the Pavillion Theatre. He wormed him self into the landlord's good graces by stating that he ex pected another ship in the river, and the landlord should have the employment of the coal-whippers. He was supplied with a capital supper and a good bed, and ;he next morning he was introduced as Captain Tur ner to the landlady and several Captains. At dirmer he " did the amiable " most gracefully. " May I ask you to take a potatoe', or any thing else, Mrs. B. ? " "To your health, Mr. B." " A prosperous voyage, Captain 5.," &c. After dinner he borrowed 20s ; of Mrs. 8., and took his departure. Mr. Adnett, of the White Lion, King-street, Wapping, said, that on Saturday sennight the prisoner repre-ente-ri himself to him as Captain Carr, and as having just landed. fie performed the same part as at Mr. Ballantine's house, and took his departure next day, after borrowing 31. from Mrs. Adnett. The prisoner, who said that he would pay all if set at . iberty, and that he was going to New South Wales by the Old Atlid, was remanded. UNION- HALL. THE SUPPRESSION OP DISTURBANCES IN !RYLAND 13thL.—Yesterday, among the Irish applicants for relief, as a man named Cooney, who wanted the Overseers of Newington to allow him a few shillings a week, as he had •ix motherless children.—The Over.eer said the p,.rish lad no objection to send him and them over to In land...-. Cooney replied that he had be-n twenty years in England, •wed freedom as much as Englishmen, and did nut wish o go to Ireland, where be would be liable to be dragged ut of his warm nest at night, by a set of fellows dressed a little brief authority. Tie Magistrates told him if I's did not choose to accept Vie offer, he must shift for himself. A petition is now being carried about the otrough of Alarylehune for signatures B.4ainst the Irish _;ttercive Bill; the number of hou-et in each street is ap pended to the petition, which is taken to each : the sig. attires, of course, will show the proportion the petitioners 'ear to the whole number of housek. epers. SIR WILLIAM HOSTE'S LIFE.—" Those .'ho love to e.totiy human na , ure in Its most vigortots yet letting form, cannot fail to be d. lighted with thefte vo uwes. All whit are connected with our navy, will con ver with exceeding interest the details it the sieges of istia and Calvi—of the expedition aJunst Tern. iffe—uf e battle of the Nile—or the surrender R..g00 and ,2otrone—together with sundry names of gal ant vc,..ers :ell. known in the annals of our country. There it 4 Ann •.iirit of instruction in the feiv simple Word., that prolog air WILLIANI'S Letters—a digs fi. tl atlintin,i'oi,,,t of hi s •hildren trim their mother's pen, at untie simpie and ,trecting."— Town .hurnsi/. At Calhike, on Sunday, a gdiant son of St. '7ri.pin wade his elopement, takin g with him his nt:igh. ,aur's wife. The loving coupie aie both ma. ned pet.ons, n , il hive left behind than large finii,ies, the !aim' I. dams laving six children, and her gallato eleven, making in all :•ventren children, and ;be husband of the toimer, a re• oec ale man, t all appearanc e lying on hi, &dal-bed, nd srveral of the chinlien W In- !act?: Ili of the Inesora. rhe patties were both discipks of the How sci.ool, and vere in daily expo t mon of receiving the lilt ut tongue.. acivoic Chronicle. HUGE AND EXPENSIVE HOG.—M `%IIDDLETON, pUbl:cati, of C :IP choor• rt , Setilco:tes , i a , ion/ in his possission a bog o th e followiiig i xtriiiiichn sty :itneosiolia :—Hezht, :3 lett 6 ineloa; 1 _riigtt, irritb .ir‘,Ut - o tail end, 9 feet 4 in, hr..; girth niche. . 6 feet 10 nhes ; .readth across the ehoulders, 22 w o w s The ur. JAS. b ve pig .vs bred by Air. 111., aid is only 16 miiiitlis oJ. 1,, weight on Wednesday week yea. 54 stone 6 pouniis, 1,-. a ,c 4 weekly consu opti on of tool is 1:: t 4 one 1.1 t Ott ey- we a l, .ides pot,tues, Sit.. It therefore e, , zst,, at a tood:la e :•maputation, fourteen VA Wings a woltk for b0ar,. • .... Y or l z Courant.