The Sun. — London, England, 1863-09-07 00:00:00

THE CIVIL WAR IN AMERICA, (From the Times' Correspondent.) NEW YORK, Aug. 21. The proclamation of Governor Seymour to the people of New York was not published until the morning of Wednesday, a few hours before the com mencement of the draught. It is a judicious and care f u lly-prepared document, and ha s been received with a howl of rage by the "shoddy" contractors, the Abolitionists, the " exterminators," the "war Christians," and all who desire the abrogation of State rights, the effacement of State lines, and the establishment of a military despotism. Governor f3eymour is not disposed to further any of the views of these gentlemen. Knowing that they would be glad of bi riot in New York, as a pretext for placing the city and State under martial law, ho warns the people in emphatic language to keep the peace, and at the same time notifies the Government of the danger it will incur if it overstep the limits of the Constitution. He draws a broad line between gees. tions of State right and Federal assnmptiou of powers not yet granted, and while reiterating his opinion that it would have been wise as well as humane on the part of Mr. Lincole to have procured a competent judicial decision on the conscription before proceeding to enforce it, he asserts for the guidance of the conscripts that the law must be obeyed until the courts shall have declared it to be unconstitutional. Denouncing the doctrine which once found favour in the eyes of Mr. Seward, Mr. Charles Sumner, and other leaders of the Republican party, when objecting to the Fugitive Slave Act,and goading the South into secession, that any man or body of men may violently resist laws which are or seem to be opposed to their private notions of right or duty, he declares that a disregard of the sacred ness of the Constitution, the majesty of the law, and the decisions of the judiciary is the greatest danger which threaten American liberty. It is his opinion that not only the Constitution and statutes of the nation, but of the several States or commonwealths of the Union, "contain ample remedies for all wrongs that may be committed either by rulers or citi zens. Those," he adds, " who wish to preserve their rights or to punish offenders, whether in public or in private life, should themselves carefully perform their duty, abstain from all illegal acts, generously support the Government, and then calmly and re. solntely claim their rights." He concludes by stating that he will allow of no opposition to the conscription, except by appeal to the Courts—the decisions of which must be respected by rulers and people alike. In all this the purpose is clear. The rebuke administered to the Government is well de served, and the warning public and insignificant. By this proclamation—as by every other act of this gentleman since he entered upon the duties of his office—he takes front rank in, if he do not assume the leadership of, the Conservative party ; and places himself—and the great State of which he is the chief magistrate—as barriers against the revo lutionary designs of the Federal Administration. Though in favour of a vigorous prosecution of the war, Mr. Seymonr's real position is far higher than that of a war demagogue.. He wishes to see the Union restored, but, whether it be restored or not, he is determined, in so far as his functions, his cha racter, and his duty extend, that it shall not be re stored at the cost of the constitutional rights and liberties of the people, or be replaced by a military dictatorship. Meantime, the great revolution is rolling on, and may perhaps roll over Governor Seymour and all who support or agree with him. The will for that purpose is not wanting at Wash ington, and the military instruments are not only ready, bat eager for the fray. Meanwhile, the combatants are ranging them selves on either side, seeming as if they had agreed to make the draught the test question which is to settle whether the Constitution be a living document or a dead letter. It is well under such circumstances that some attention should be bestowed in Europe on the composition of the contending forces. On the Conservative side are arranged all the educated Americans, comparatively few in number, who think the Federal and the State Constitution snffi cient for the maintenance of popular liberty and a Republican form of Government, and who are op posed to all and every change, and especially to in terference with Southern slavery,which they hold to be in every respect a local and not a Federal or na tional question. Along with them go the vast mass of the working classes, who, under the ancient system, possessed the privilege of a vote and all the rights and immunities of citizenship. These included free dom from taxation and conscription—one the worst evil of insular, and the other of continental Europe, which they or their forefathers had fled to America to escape. Up to the outbreak of the Civil War these classes were accustomed, each individually, to look upon himself as the equal, if not the superior, of the Presiden t—a paid functionary,who was the mere creature of their votes, and the servant of their will. Of the same opinions as the working classes are the struggling traders and professional people of all de grees, who see in the war the ruin of their prospects. To these have to be added the higher class of lawyers, educated in respect for the law, and too independent in the exercise of their profession to accept minor judgeships or other spoils of office at the hands of the Administration. These diverse, but sympathetic, bodies of earnest men form a strong phalanx, and, having the advantage of the past history and tradi tions and the existing law and Constitution of the Republic on their side, ought to be able in days of danger to meet every revolutionary pro. jest with the formidable opposition both of rea son and of numbers. Oa the other side are ranged the minority, who are in actual possession of office—a minority of preachers, theorists, doc trinaires, strong-minded women, hangers on of the conventicle, emaneipationists (of the slaves of other people), and all the rich, who think that no man should have a vote unless he be American born and possess a large amount of property. The latter class of people have as strong an objection to uni versal suffrage and as intense a hatred of its real or anticipated results as was ever entertained by the most narrow-minded opponent of the Reform Bill in England. No aristocrat of the Faubourg St. Germain in the days of Louis XV. ever looked down with more contempt upon a Blain or a roturier than these new rich men of America look down upon the labouring classes, especially if they be Irishmen, rrnsaus, or negroes. Their nature have become "Petic by the possession of wealth, the only posses- Con fers that is respected in a country where office con no honour and where no social rank exists, they would naeezith despotism at home and abroad. They of Federgain e Irish and Germans to fight the battles the same purar ; they would employ the negroes for exercise of : 01. 3 iv e , but they would deny all three the newly arrived im eal . rights, and place between the possession or a certaint annual income, but a resi ars. They look without much fear or any disfavour on the in?, the South into possibility of convert ingor a Venetia, to be held at the cannon's month n ce at eans of a large stan d in g army ; and are so passioy the North shall be a nation— ely determined that "e , homoge neous , an d indivisible —strong enough to i nsult the minor and k ee p the superior kingdoms of Europa sesame , in a a u we of its di sp l easu re, and more especially t me that place in the trade and politics of the 'merle Which is occupied by Great Brita in, and the y Would cheer fully sacrifice their lib ert y to achieve the d es i red end, and bend their necks to the yoke of an iron. handed captain who would do them the favour to seize upon authority. Unlike the revolution s o f Europe —which broke out in resistless fury for the sake of popular liberty—the revolution that has commenced in America is guided in the interest of arbitrary power. Governor Seymour and the Demo crats are Conservatives. Mr. Lincoln and the Re publicans are innovators and destructives. The one party prizes liberty for the white man ; the other party only prizes it for the black man, with this fatal restriction of the benefit to be conferred, that the black man is only to be freed in order to be expa triated. During the three days of the draught, which commenced on W e d nesday and proceeded yesterday and to-day, the most profound tranquillity has pre railed in the city. Not the slightest attempt at disturbance has anywhere been witnessed ; on the contrary, the turning of the wh ee l s o f f ortune b y blind men has in the presence of vast crowds of spectators, has given rise to much good humoured J banter, and the display of that somewhat rough and rollicking fun which is characteristic of the rowdy American. The Republican journals, which persist in insulting the only class of men from amid whom their sorely needed soldiers are to be ob tained, take care to inform their readers that it is solely owing to the stern measures of precaution taken by the Government—the presence of 20,000 armed troops in different districts of the city, and of half a score of gunboats in the north and east rivers—that the crowd is so peaceable. A few Ministerial journals not quite so violent insist that the public feeling on the subject of the draught has undergone a change, and that the working classes are not only resigned to it as a national necessity, but are of opinion that, all things considered, it is fair and equit able. The value of both of these assertions will soon be tested. Let but the Corporation of New York, either by the opposing action of Mr.Opdyke, the Mayor, or from any other circumstance, refuse or neglect to vote the promised sum of 3,000,00 0 dols. to purchase substitutes for the poor conscripts who decline to serve, and there will be a commotion in New York which will fully employ all the mill- tary skill of Gen. Dix and all the bravery of his 20,000 men to bring to any other th an a di of close. The conscripts of the labouring class believe that this money will be paid , a nd for btlhsreason, and for no other, whatever th e Republicans n s may te e a o l l o e l g , e a n t d o g t o h a e b c o o a n t tra their ry, ordinary hey keep e b e p u s itnheesisr m i f p n e o r - s thing had happened. It this expectation, the seizure oftheythbee fidirsstaepopnosienrtiepdt by n opent bre a h k i s . mitiliistiamrypofossricbelewfiolrl abneythone es an to ou eswighnoalwfioshr eyes to the facts to ig nore the the aourmg classes is represented by those who have willbeenn among surprise g r t p h r e is m e as particularly violent; and it the police, however much it may surprise the doc trinaires and black philanthropists who have Mr. Lincoln in their keeping, if there should be an in surrection of furious women rather than suffer their sons or husbands to be carried into mili tary slavery to fight for a cause in which they have long ceased to feel the slightest interest. There are not wanting cynics who affirm that even for this contingency the Government is prepared ; that it not only does not fear, but would be glad of its occurrence, because it would afford the dearly coveted excuse for declaring martial law, deposing or incarcerating Governor Seymour, and making an end once and for ever of the local rights of the • most powerful, and, as the Government regards it, . the most troublesome State in the Union. There is 3 little danger, however, if the three million dollars 3 can avert the catastrophe, that the money will not be forthcoming. The Mayor may veto the appro priation, but he can only postpone, not prevent, the passing of the measure, if the Aldermen and Common Council are resolute in their purpose to preserve the peace of the city by this means. His veto becomes inoperative, if, being debated after an interval of ten days, it is overruled by a two thirds' majority. And, as the two Civic Courts are said to be all but unanimous on the subject, the opposition of the Mayor can cause no worse mischief than delay, while personally it will entitle him to the gratitude of the Administration for having done his best to meet their wishes,—a gratitude which may or may not show itself by the award of a new contract for the supply of army clothing, such as has already fallen to the lot of this fortu nate politician. The Extraordinary Discovery in White chapel Church. FURTHER DISCOVERIES. On Saturday forenoon, at 10 o'clock, a search in a part of the church hitherto overlooked was instituted by order of Mr. Churchwarden N. J. Powell, and with the most unex pected results. In the belfry, behind a sort of wooden chamber or box containing one of the huge clock-weights, a child's coffin was found standing on end. Upon proceeding upstairs into the clock chamber, the men employed in the examination found a child in a shroud, and no tem er than 11 skulls. There was also in another part of the chamber a coffin eon taiLing a quantity of sawdust, which, upon being removed, disclosed to view the skeleton of a child, with a cap on the skull. These ane. other remains had been placed behind some beams or joists parallel to the wall, at a height of 18 feet above the floor of the chamber. To reach the spot where the remains were found it is stated that two persons at least must have been engaged, for the only access to it was by means of a narrow ledge of timber, eight feet from the ground, and the coffins must have been handed up to the person above by an accomplice. The place to catch hold of was very narrow, and if the person clinging on had made the slightest slip, he would infallibly have been killed by falling into the iron machinery of the church bells. A builder, Mr. Hicks, of Whitechapel, has been engaged to carry on this further search. A carpenter, John Roche, employed under him, states that from the appearance of the wood of the coffins, some at least of them must have been placed where they were found within the last two years. Fragments of others present the appearance of being thirty years old. _ . The searches previously made being thus found to be incomplete, Mr. Hi c k s h as b ee n directed to re-examine . the roof and take u p t h e floor i ng o f t h e pe ws over the gas-pipes. The boards of the flooring have been accordingly removed, but nothing fnrther has been discovered, and th e re-exami nation of the roof has likewise yielded a negative result. The carpenters have now been set to work to view the boards in the galleries, but, as far as they have get gone, no more re mains have been found. The roof itself is made of oak, and of course could not be removed without enormous expense ; consequently it will not b e removed, as h as b ee n stated in a morning paper, and it i s no t suppose d t h a t an ything further is concealed in it. The total number of remains found by this new search is three bodies of children, eleven skulls, and a quantity of fragments of bodies, besides coffins complete and broken up. It is extraordinary that these remains were not discovered before, as a marble slab in the bell-chamber states that the bells were thor oug hl y repa i red in honour of the marriage of the Prince of Wales, on the 10th of March last. INQUEST ON THE REMAINS AND SINGULAR On Saturday afternoon Mr. J DISCLOSURES Middlesex, and a jury of the inhabitants b il l t n a m n t p:h e r t y s , t e . o l ro i n a r e y r , W o f h E i a t e s - t circumstances chapel, assembled at the Angel a nn, -csetnrneeetc,tefdorwtihthe purpose of inquiring into the • the recent discovery of a number of llwiY whose remains were stowed aw a y i n ooeffi-porn children, rbouldieths eofromofchanild. belfry of Whitechapel Church. It appears that, up to Friday night, the threedre n, exceptions,apparently , hadsizeo been e theiren discovered, mor remains, n but it was with two or morning been re ported that there had during Saturday dis covered the skulls and other remains of 11 mor i e n e themildren, as well as fragments of coffins which had contained The affair appears to h ave erected much scandalin . the ne i g hbo ur hood, and the Rev. Mr. Cohen, the rector, c h ur chw a rdens, and other pa r ochial authorities were and not present, but were repr esented b y Mr. Farnh am , from the Mitchell, solicitor and clerk to the vestry of the parish. The bodies were ranged in a row in one of the corridors leading to the gallery of the church, where theywere viewed by the jury (one appeared to be that of an infant some two or three months old), but they were all shrivelled up into mere mummies. On returning to the inquest room, The Coroners said although there were fourteen bodies found he only proposed to inquire as to the largest child and one or two others, as they no doubt would give the clue to the whole. Joseph Cooper was first sworn, and said he lived at 10, Shaftesbury-place, and is a carpenter. He was working at Whitechapel Church, fixing ventilators, on Thursday morn ing. Was also at work there on Saturday, the 22d August, in the roof. Whilst at work he discovered a coffin. This was about a quarter to nine in the morning. On opening the coffin he found the body of s child. The coffin was on the south side of the roof between the rafters, and on a tie beam, and one end resting on the gutter. Had no know ledge how the coffin and child came there. witness, Tomlinson, a fellow workman of the previous corroborated his evidence as to the finding of this body, first body ivir• Charles Blackman said he was a surgeon and regis trar,child, of the and on N from the skull and y f oul : da 3 7 afternoon was called to examine the probable believed it to be the body of a female course state the can: from l f e age of three months. He judged so the fecal process. it had lived. There°:f death, Could not of had become Converted but there was no doubt that aitiltno fracture of the skull. The skin He should imagine the cia o iidleather almost in some parts. had been in the coffin and up in the roof of the church from i one to to two y ears . E xam i ne d the body in conjunction with Liddell,oiiha ilhda d medical been officerddead o f health, and he agreed with hi m. Ty—l do n o t thi nk th; By the Jut three or four years. The knees of the ci and much con tracted, but I can onl y account are drawn up f or that from i the child dying in convulsions, or it might be fro m doubled up after death. There was a ca p round the beingd but nothing whatever leadng to identification. We givecain, private practice a special certificate when a child is " still born," I think they will not bury " atillborna" at a ceme tery without a certificate, but the law does not compel one to be given. The Coroner said he would now take any evidence likely to show how the body came there. a The inspector of police said there was one coffin that shad a name on it, and he had found the parties who belonged to that child. found The witness he coffi n which Cooper had wa st recalled,he name bodies. The name on the coffin was " Mrs. Forster, 35, Bedford -street." on n nd it p;o it v i :d th t e ha o t th h e e r Mr. Jchn Liddell sworn—Was medical officer of health of the Whitechapel district. Had been called upon to exa mine some of these bodies, and examined, in conjunction with Mr. Blackman, the child first found. He entirely con curred with Mr. Blackman in his evidence as to that child. He had also examined the body of the child in the coffin having an address on it. It was a full-timed child, or nearly so, but was too much decomposed and destroyed to discover the sex. He could hardly say how long the child had been dead. Found no fracture of . the skull or any in juries. He believed all the rest of the children were " still • borns," so far as he could j udge. Sarah Allen said she resided at 27, Antliff-street, Cottage lane, Stepney. Had been m arried since the 21st of A p ril, 1861. In the year prior to that she gave birth to a child. Mr. Mahoney, of the Commercial road, attended her in her confinement. It was a stillborn and not a full timed child, For the purpose of burial Mr. Canham, an undertaker, of the Mile-end-road, was engaged. He sent a man for it who took it away. He charged 75., but gave no receipt. By the Coroner—He told me that the burial or church fees were 3s. 6d„ and he charged me 7s. That was on the 23d March, 1860. It was born on that day, and left my house the same evening, I got a certificate from Mr. Ma honey. The man who took the child away took that certi ficate with him. When I heard the child had not been buried I was much surprised. Mr. Canham had gone away for some time. I had seen the man who had fetched the body of my child away before. Mr. Canhan has buried four of my children, once since the child referred to by the jury. Three children were illegitimate and one legitimate ; t wo o f the four were born alive. The same man camo for the one that has now been found, and one before that; the other that died was five days old. There was another ono born alive, and was five weeks old when it died. The child that lived fivo days was born in May, 1860. I had a certificate from Mr. Mahoney with all of them. I understood that both the children were to be buried at Bow Cemetery. The first child,: which lived five days, 1 paid £1 2s. 6d. to have buried. I have not seen the man who fetched the children away since 1861. The child that lived five weeks was born on Sept. 12, 1858. I think I could tell the dress of the child that lived five weeks, and also of the one that lived five days. I followed the one that lived five weeks to the grave at Bow Cemetery myself, but the one that lived five days Mr. Canham's man took away. The Coroner directed the witness to go with one of the officers and examine the clothing found in some of the coffins. John Holley said he resided at Orange-row, Charlotte street, Whitechapel, and is an undertaker. Had conducted funerals in that parish many years, and was accustomed to bury at Whitechapel Church stillborn children up to within two years. When he had a funeral of a stillborn he used to consign the body to a man of the name of Smith, belltoller and gravedigger. Coroner—You don't call that burying them at White chapel Church ? Witness—Smith used to fetch the bodies of stillborn children from my place, and I used to give him the certifi cate, and 2s. 6d. to pay the sexton. I also gave him some thing for himself as porter or messenger. I don't know whether the bodies were buried by Smith or not. I have my suspicion now that they were not. I have sometimes seen Wilkinson, the sexton, and he has sent Smith, the gravedigger, to me for the body. He has done so many times. I have taken bodies to the church myself and deli vered them to Mr. Wilkinson, but more usually they were delivered to Smith. 1 should say I have delivered them to Wilkinson at the church about four years. I have not buried other children at Whitechapel Church since the pass ing of the Interment Act, 6 or 7 years. By the Jury—We paid 2s. 6d. at Whitechapel, and we could get them buried at Whitcliffe Chapel for Is. 6d. We have kept children, stillborns, sometimes 3 months, The certificates are sometimes signed by midwives. We take any woman signing a certificate as a "midwife." I think the Legislature is very wrong with regard to the facilities for burying stillborn children. Sarah Allen re-called—Had examined the clothing, and identified a piece of calico in the coffin which had the name on it. The coffin for the one which had lived five days was covered with cloth. Samuel Wilkinson, the sexton, on being handed the book to be sworn, appeared much excited, and said—l am inno cent of this charge, so help me God. Coroner—Do not go on in that way. No one has charged you, that I am aware of. He was then sworn, and said—l have been sexton of Whitechapel 27 years next January. I formerly, as sexton, received the bodies of stillborn children for interment. The last one, I believe, I had in the beginning of this spring, which had a certificate signed by Mr. Blackman. I have never been in the habit of receiving them from Mr. Willey and other undertakers. I will swear I never received any in my life from Mr. Willey. He never came to me to tell me he had a "stillborn" to bury. Coroner—Do you know Mr. Hicks, an undertaker? Witness—l cannot say I do. I knew Mr. Canham, but I never had any thing to do with him. I mean he never brought any stillborn children to be buried at the church to my knowledge. I knew William Smith, who used to work in the yard. He is dead. I never sent him to Mr. Willey's to fetch the stillborn children. I never did so in my life I should say that very few, not above 3 or 4, stillborn chil dren have been buried during the last five years at White chapel Church. Coroner—You don't mean to t ell the Court that you have only had three or four during the last five years. Witness—On my oath I have not. Coroner—Where are the certificates? Witness—l don't know. I don't keep them. I don't file them. I don't know that Mr. Mahoney signed certificates. When a child was brought to be buried there was always a certificate that it was a stillborn child. I never received a midwife's certificate in my life. I never buried a child with a "female" midwife's certificate. (Laughter.) I might do so now. I always buried the children in Whitechapel churchyard. The four or five I have alluded to have been buried in separate graves. I receive as a fee half-a-crown with each stillborn. I don't know how it is regulated or who regulates the fees. If they are very poor we get ls. 6d. I keep that fee, and do not account for it, or pay it over to the churchwardens. As sexton it is my duty to keep the keys and custody of the church and churchyard. I have nothing at all to do with the key of the tower or steeple. The keys of the tower are kept in the church porch going up to the steeple. Others have a key of the churchyard and not the church. The churchwardens have. Coroner—There have been 14 remains of bodies found in the church, and I want your explanation of how these bodies could get there without your knowledge. Witness—That is very easy. There are a great many people come to chime the bells and practising. I am all about the church, and persons might carry coffins up there with children in them without my knowledge. I open the church in the morning and close it at night. I know nothing about these bodies which have been found in the roof. 1 have only one key to the church. No one could go through the churchyard if the gates were closed without going through my house, and I should not let them do so without my knowing their business. There are the pew-openers cleaning there two or three times a week. Coroner—On your oath you tell the Court you do not know how these bodies came into the church ? Witness—On my oath I do not. When the first coffin was found and the man told me, I thought he was joking; but when he showed it to me I told him to put it where he found it, and I went and reported it to the churchwarden. By the Coroner—l gave the other certificates when bodies were buried to the clerk. I did not do so with regard to still-borne, because there was no necessity for it, but I kept money for them. (Laughter.) By the Jury—l never was in the roof or belfry in the church in my life till this discovery. My appointment is an annual one. Wm. Shipman said he has been steeple-keeper and bell man of Whitechapel Church since Prince Albert died. He used to do a little work there prior to that in chiming the bells. Had been a bell ringer there five years, and went up and down there, when a boy, 45 years ago. Had had the run of the church since Prince Albert died. Had a key of the outer gate, which Mr, Corner, chief bell ringer, gave him, and usually found the key of the belfry on a ledge in the porch. When he used to go to ring what they called the breakfast bell on Sunday mornings, he had to go to Mr. Wi lkinson's for the key. He did not get up very early. Did not suppose gentlemen like him did get up veryearly. (A. laugh.) Knew Smith, the gravedigger, and rang a death peal for him ; that was about two years ago. There had been no gravedigger since been there, and would swear that, to his knowledge, there had been no grave opened there either for a Mill born or any other person since Prince Albert died. By the Coroner—l have never seen any undertaker's black bag with small coffins in it since Ihave been there. I never saw the sight of a single one, and I never took in a still born child to be buried. I have heard that bodies have been found in the roof of the church, but I know nothing of how they came there. I never saw Smith bring any bodies there. I was connected with undertakers years ago, but they paid so badly that I thought I might as well walk about the streets for nothing as work for nothing. I used to go for the key of the church to Mr. Wilkinson's back door, and the servant sometimes gave it to me. Walter Varcoe said he resided at 2, Spital-street, Mile end Old Town, and was an undertaker in the employ of Mr. Holly and Mr. Hanes, inilunt-streit,and other undertakers, for 30 years. It was the practice of some undertakers to keep still horns till they got four or five, and sometimes as many as a dozen, and then take them to be buried. He had known a dozen taken to Ilford at once. Whilst with Mr. Holly he used to bury still horns at Whitechapel Church. He left Mr. Holly two years and a half ago. He knew Mr. Wilkinson, the sexton. lie never took still-boors there himself. They were all taken away by a man named Smith, who is now dead. Never had any conversation with Wilkinson Church; about still-borns being buried at Whitech a P el When he had still-born to used to call on Smith --- -- TIM SUN, "LONDON, MONDAY EVENXNG, SEPTEMBER 7, 1863. to see if he could find him about the ground, and when Ito did so he used to tell him that there were some still-borns waiting for him to fetch away. The Rev. Mr. Cohen, the rector of Whitcehapel, here in quired what was to be done with the bodies, as they wished to get them removed, so that the church might be got ready for the morning's service. The Coroner said they might be removed into a vault or up into the belfry again, but it was most essential that they should be placed in some place of security, as well as of easy access; or at all events that those which had dresses should have them handy, as they might lead to identify and throw some light on who had charge of the bodies. It was arranged that they should be removed, under su pervision of the police inspector present. Evidence of Varcoe continued—l never saw Mr Wilkin son when I went to look after Smith. When Smith fetched the " stills " he sometimes brought a black bag and some times a sack. I have seen him remove as many as four at one time. I should say he could not smuggle them into the belfry without being seen. By the Coroner—lt is always usual to have a certificate from a medical man or midwife for burial of a still-born child. We should take it as a certificate from a midwife whether it was true that the party signed it or not. Coroner—ln your 30 years' experience do you know of it being the fact, that bodies which are sometimes left with undertakers for burial don't get buried at all ? Witness—Such things might have taken place, but they have not come under my knowedge personally. Coroner—When a child is brought with a certificate as a "still-born," do you or the undertakers exercise any super vision to see if it is " still •born" or not ? Witness—Sometimes people come and say they have a "still-born" to bury, and they get the shell, and bring the body back to be buried, and it is taken as a " still-born " without any further inquiry. By the Coroner—Supposing it is found not to be a "still born," then we should refuse to bury it without the regular fees. It would be 9s. €d. at the Victoria, and 2s. Gd. if a still born. I have no doubt that many children are buried as " still-born" which are not still-born. Joseph Corner sail he resided at 6, Newland-place, llishopsgate, and wes a labourer. Had been employed as gravedigger in several burial grounds. Never received any still-born ;children at Whitechapel Church while he dug graves there, which was about three years ago. All he had to do was to dig graves in the ground. The Coroner said they had now got as far as they could with their inquiry that day, and he was free to confess the evidence they had as yet heard threw but very little light upon the fact of how these bodies got into the place where they were found. The dresses, however, in which some of the bodies were placed might, however, be identified, and throw some light upon it, if they adjourned, and trace out the party or parties who put them there. He proposed, therefore, to adjourn for a week. After some discussion the inquiry was adjourned till Saturday next. SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. SATURDAY REVIEW.—The extraordinary dulness of the Summer Assizes, was, to some extent, re lieved by th e trial ; bout Campden House—a trial of considerable interest to that numerous class who insure their houses and their furni ture. The case in itself was interesting, and it was doubly i nterest i ng as s h ow i ng the sort o f grounds on wh i ch the managers o f two lead ing ins urance offices thoug h t i t r i g h t and decent to charge people, not merely with arson, but with arson committed under circumstances which in volved the moral guilt of a triple murder of the most horrible character., If Mr. Wolley really converted his house int o a sort o f i n f e rnal machine, an d se t fire to it without taking any precautions against the destruction of the Temples, he undoubtedly com mitted a crime infinitely more atrocious than the common run of murders. The verdict of the jury having cleared his c haracter from this diabolical gui't, it b ecomes matter o f some thing more tha n curiosity t o see what were th e g rounds on whi c h the two companies in quest i on cons id e r e d themselv es warranted Campde n H ouse occurre d between three and four in imputing it to him. The fire at in the morning of the 23d of March, 1802, when the house itself and its contents were destroyed. The tenant of the house, Mr. Walley, was 45 years of age. I n hi s youth h e had been, as we learn from the o ff ens i ve and i m pertinent cross-examina tion to which the defendants th ou g ht p ro p er to sub ject him, what peop l e call " an uncertain posi tion ;" that is, he had been something between a waiter, a clerk, and an actor--a little of each. In 1847 he married a Miss Coape, who, as well as her 1854, he bou g h t a 9 9 years ' lease of Campden House, younger si s t er , h a d a fortune of £ 35,000 . In and in 1855 he let it to Colonelnaugh. and he went himself to live at Tunbridge Castle. Whilst there, his wife was accidently drowned during her hus band's absence, and after her death the younger sister continued to live with her brother-in-law. Each of these ladies appear to have entered fully into Mr. Wolley's tastes. He laid out the whole of his wife's fortune in buying, furnishing, and orna menting the house. Nearly £lO,OOO out of the fortune of his s ister•in-law, was spent in the same manner. The family lived on the income of the rest of her property. The house itself would appear from the evidence to have been a sort of old curiosity shop. It was full of curious carvings , o rnamental ceilings, pictures, rich carpets, gildings, chandeliers, and all manner of other things of the hind. Mr. Wolley carried his taste so far that he once bought an estate in Essex for £1,300, and sold it again for £9OO, merely for being able to remove s om e r ich carvings con t a ined, and which thus cost him £4OO. t w h h e ic s h ak i e t o t In short the description of the house and its con tents is exactly like that which Balzac gives in his novels of the dwellings of such monomaniacs as at many of which amateur plays Cousin Pons or Balthasar Claes. The use to which One lady said, " There were large this remarkable house was put was that of giving retre°pPse';rhape 20 in the season." e mere very frequently, and theatrical en tertainments,sometimes 300 or 400 people there at as sembliesconcerts." The plays seem, for the as semblies were splendid acted. P th a have been for the benefitof was Coapefhat of wentlB6l, d wn would be a n d charitable most part, to institutions. The last season of the splendour of to a small after which Mr. new set of festivities. Early in March Brighton, where they appear to have lived peo ple till the time should come round al h ig o ka u ei snoet hfora at I C v a o m n p e d y en an H d ou l‘ s e liss Mr. Woliey returned from Brighton to Campden House with bis servant Crozier, whom be was ob liged to have constantly near him because he was subject to epileptic fits. A carpenter and builder, named Temple, whom Mr. Wolley had kept con stantly in his employ for many years, was taking care of the house at the time, with his wife and son ; and there, according to the theory of the defendants, Mr. Wolley and Crozier spent three weeks in deli berately prepa . ring to burn down the house, with the Temples in it —a plan which, the Insurance Company assert, was duly carried into execution. Certainly all the antecedent probabilities of the matter are fiagantly opposed to this view of the case. The particular facts which the defendants deemed suffiaient to support the theory that Mr. Wolley did burn his house, notwithstanding all this, were that he carefully prepared the house for burning— that he hung the walls with paper, put tapestry over the windows to conceal the flames during the early part of the fire, varnished the wainscoting, and laid out the books on the tables as if to dry. It was admitted that there were plausible dt pre texts" for all this—that the varnishing was natural enough, that the paper was said to have been hung up over the varnished wainscots for the sake et keeping off dirt and insects, that the tapestry was hung against the light in order that the holes in it might be easily seen and conveniently mended, and that the books might have been opened to dry. It was said, of course, there would be pretexts, but here there were " striking coincidences. If it was an accident, it was the most wonderful that ever occurred ; there was the varnishing and repairing of tapestry and the drying of books, and the covering up of walls all happening at the same time." This is the sort of argument which may be excused in a counsel who has a weak case, bat it is astonishing that cool men of business should act upon such absurdly frivolous reasoning. There is about as much marvel in this coincidence as in the coinci dence between taking up the carpets, whitewashing the ceiling, and putting brown-holland covers on the furniture, which may usually be observed when a family goes out of town. The simple fact is, that each of these operations was connected with setting the house to rights, and all, therefore, would natur ally take place at the same time. Besides this there is something monstrous in the notion of a man carry ing out all these designs under the eyes of domestic spies who would ha. e it in their power to bear wit ness against him, and whose absence he might easily have procured. The presence of the Temples in the house was barely consistent with the theory of the defendants. This was (after recapitulating the evidence) the substance of the case. It is curious to see how little it comes to when it is put together. There is not in the whole range of the evidence a single fact which really proves any one of the elements of such a crime as was imputed to Mr. j Wolley. There is no proof of motive, no proof of preparation, no proof of execution, There are isolated facts which, if you choose to begin by assuming that there was a crime at al], point out the way in which it was committed. Assume that Mr. Wolley did burn his house fraudulently, and the different facts proved will no doubt bear the construction put upon them by the companies ; but there is nothing whatever to compel that con clusion, though they might suggest it to persons whose interest and, to some extent, whose duty it is to be suspicious. The case is a good instance of the nature of suspicion as distinguished from proof ; and, we may add, it is a striking example of the extent to which suspicion may be made to do duty in place of proof. A. Court of Justice was occupied for a whole week in listening to " evidence" which it did not need two minutes' deliberation to stamp as utterly frivolous and worthless. The fact that the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff on the instant, without leaving their box, furnishes a suffi cient comment on a proceeding which is probably unexampled, and which, it may be hoped, is little likely to be regarded by Insurance Companies as a precedent for imitation. SPECTATOR.—The report, for it is only a report, that the Czar is willing to reconstitute the Grand Duchy of Warsaw under an Imperial Lieutenant, is in itself an important testimony to the strength of the insurrection. Three years ago the Poles only claimed to be governed as an independent province. Provided their religion were respected, the right of educating themselves conceded, the relations of nobles and peasants amicably settled, and industrial enterprise encouraged, the party of progress, headed by Count Andre Zsmoiski, desired nothing more for years to come. 'they knew Europe was weary of the Polish question, they desponded of their own strength, and in spite of the Czar's unworthy speech atWarsaw—"l shall know how to be severe"—they believed that the tyranny of Nicholas could never be renewed. They had yet to learn that a weak, well-meaning man, with such creatures as Wielo polski, Gortschakoff, and Mouravieff, might be more fatal to his subjects than the sovereign whose sole faith had been: ; his own divinity. Since the massacre of Feb., 1861, when the Russian soldiers fire-I on a peaceful and unarmed multitude, the Government of St. Petersburg has pursued a relentless policy of ex tinction. It menaced the clergy, closed the churches, suppressed schools, and made a state of siege the police of the country. Under the Grand Duke Constantine the last outrage on national self-respect was perpetrated. It was resolved to press all the energy and intelligence of the country into the ser vice of its oppressors. Then, and then only, it was decided by the majority of a single vote in the Central Committee of the National Government that the conscripts had better die fighting against Russia than in her ranks. No Pole at that time expected the results which have actually been achieved. The single hope that seemed probable, that of foreign intervention, has been painfully disappointed. But, through a number of unfore seen circumstances, a singularly mild winter, the incredible negligence of the Russian generals at the outset, the demoralisation of the troops, and the un precedented union of different classes iu Poland, the insurrection has maintained itself and spread. Ruseia at this moment has 250,000 men in the kingdoM and the old provinces, has sent even the Guards from St. Petersburg, and has decreed a fresh levy in the two-thirds!of her empire that can be trusted. She has had from the first the cordial support of Prussia, equivalent at least to an additional corps ct armee, and latterly something more than neu trality from Austria. Her military governors, once roused, have acted with vigour, and, setting aside Lithuania as the theatre of an exceptional monster —Mouravieff, the results of the last year are suffi ciently startling. In Warsaw, a fourth of the population is said to be in arms, killed, or trans ported; in the district of Lublin, one of the best governed, one hundred gentlemen have been im prisoned, and in Kalisch only a few are out of prison. Confiscations, flogging, hanging, sometimes even burning alive, have been episodes in the ter rible struggle. At the end of eight months the National Governm e nt is more firmly organised than ever, dismisses officials, interrupts railway commu nication, forbids taxes to be paid except to itself, and, unhappily, is even able to retaliate death on the secret agents of the enemy. Its troops, in spite of official bulletins, occupy the country, and the Russians hold not an inch between Warsaw and Galicia on which they are not in force enough to give battle. The Imperial trea sury is so nearly exhausted that silver is nowhere seen except in Warsaw, and the salaries of the chief official's have been unpaid for months. Of course, this state of things may be altered at any moment. Men without drill, without mum tions of war, without regular encampments, and without hospitals, are at terrible disadvantage against the chances of battle or disease. Neverthe less, the last reports say that the insurgents have been victorious at Janow and threaten Lublin. It is at this moment that the Russian Government, bankrupt of money and men, and painfully con scious of the loathing it excites in Europe, pro poses to quiet the revolt by an offer of provisional independence. It is as if George 111. had proposed, after the convention of Saratoga. that the Ameri cans should disarm on condition of being allowed to tax themselves. Th e imprisonment or death or 40,000 men and women may seem a very small thing to the Court of Petorhoff—hut it leaves memo ries that are not easily effaced among the suffering people. LONDON REVIEW.--It can scarcely be said that the conquest of Mexico is yet complete, or the new form of government fully established, or the future Emperor irrevocably chosen. It may be that the French may still find much work before them, ere their self-imposed task be thoroughly accomplished. Minor guerilla chiefs may refuse to submit, and may continue to give considerable trouble—brigan dage, and faction may retard for some time longer the final reduction and pacification of the country ; and it is possible, though not probable, that on looking more closely at the prospect before him, the Sovereign elect, the Archduke Maximilian, may be induced to decline the Imperial throne. Still we cannot apprehend that any of these possibilities will materially affect the ultimate result. We may be quite sure that Louis Napoleon will not draw back from an enterprise which is now so nearly com pleted, and which cost him so much. France can not afford to be baffled, and is not accustomed to put up with failure and defeat, even in expedi tions which are not or were not popular ; and if the Austrian prince should finally prefer a quiet life at home to the splendid temptations of grati fied ambition, other less cautious, and perhaps less eligible candidates, will no doubt be found. The idea of erecting a monarchical government in Mex ico did not originate with the French Emperor. More than twenty years ago it was felt by the best and ablest dictator Mexico ever had, Santa Anna, that the elements of a permanent and vigo rous democratic administration did not exist in that country, and could not be created, and that her only means of escape from ceaseless anarchy and utter ruin would be found in the establishment of an autocracy, and the selection of a European prince. All that was sensible and educated among the Mexican people felt as Santa Anna did. A ne gotiation, with the view of bring in g about such a result was (about 1842, we believe) entered into with the chief powers of Europe, and their sanc tion and co-operation w ere requested . The plan was favourably received, and matters even went so far that the crown was informally offered to the Archduke Frederick, and not refused either by him or by the Court of Vienna. But the United States threatened violent opposition, and the har mony which at one time had reigned among the potentates of the old world was disturbed ; Santa Anna fell from power; and the scheme fell into abeyance. It was, however, in the main, too natu ral and judicious not to be sure of revival on the first favourable opportunity ; and having been now taken up and acted on b y so resolut e a Sovereign as Louis Napoleon, we may fairly assume that, under s ome modification or other, and under some chief or other, Mexico will become a settled state, with an imperial regime, and under the protection and enforcement of a French army of occupation. It remains for consideration how far and in what man ner this stupendous change will affect the ulti mate position and policy of the two great divisions of what was once the United States. In the first place a crushing blow has been struck at the , 6 Monroe doctrine," and that by the only Power with which the propounders of that doctrine never seem inclined to quarrel—perhaps because it is the only one which is always ready to tak e up any g auntlet. That insolent declaration, which assumed to forbid not only the establishment or intervention of any European power, but the erection of mon archical government, on any portion of the vast continent of North America, was o f itself preten tious in the extreme, a n d could find nothing either in the claims of justi ce or the ultimate welfare of the human race to warrant or excuse it. It wa s on ly a few years since European and in the monarchical autho rity had been comp e ll e d , era of its feebleness, to relax its hold on some of the fairest and most fer tile and most extensiveermore regions o f th a t cont i nent. I t year became year by obvious that republican institutions were utterly unsuited t o th e d we ll ers i n those countries which, though they had succeeded in throwi ng off theyoke of Spain, showed them selves quit e una bl e to utilise or to maintain the free dom they had gained; and that the continued attempt could only insure a long period of suffering and turbiaencei s and a final result o f com pl e t e degene racy and exhaustion. This, however, was of course what the United States foresaw and desired. They hoped, and with reason, that if they could only warn off European aid and monarchical vigour long enough from the emancipated colonies of Spain, these would fall into their grasp as soon as they were ready to take possession, and would, indeed, be so wretched in their existing condition as to wel come any foreign conqueror who would rescue them and rule them. Mexico especially was marked as the first prey of the all-devouring Republic of the West, which had already desolated her in two wars, and snatched from her an enormous slice of terri tory by a shameless mixture of force and fraud. The establishment of a Bottled and strong Govern ment in Mexico, under the protection of a first class European power, to be recognised by the rest of Europe as a matter of courtesy and right,assoo a n AA the establishment is complete, is therefore double blow to the ambition of the Anglo-Ameri cans; it deprives them of a vast and rich inherit ance which they had long counted as their own; and it cuts them off from the still more tempting countries which lie still further So the south. In fact, it gives them, for the first time iu their national existence, a fixed and definite Southern boundary. It renders their territory limited instead of un limited, though still enormous. It bounds their imagination, and by that simple process wounds their national vanity. EXAMINER.—It was a maxim of Jonathan Wild the Great to do no more mischief than was abso lutely necessary, as mischief was a thing too pre cious to be wasted. The American Government seems to hold a similar opinion as to falsehood, and a in Mr. Seward's re v i ew o f the war there is sur prising amount of truth. The Foreign Secretary evidently thinks that sufficient for the day past was the Lim-flarn thereof, and he therefore does not romance about events which have passed into the domain of history. What, indeed, would have been the use of wasting precious falsehood upon facts now beyond dispute? It was all very well upon occasions of disaster to make things pleasant by a little concoction of invention; but that is all gone be, the truth too well established, and any fibbing now would be worse than useless, absolutely detri mental. If the war were now described as a series of successes, with a few exceptions having no con sequences, such as Bull's Run and Fredericksburg, people would naturally say, why is it not all over ? If so much has been done, how can anything remain to be done ? Gross, indeed, must be the mismanage ment which allows the war to drag on which has been marked with a succession of triumphs. Mr. Seward is cunning enough to see that this would not do, so he is truthful enough in his review of the war till he comes to the recent turn of its fortunes in favour of the North, and then he expends upon it all the fine colouring he has kept in reserve. Indeed, the dark shadows of the earlier passages serve to set forth more brightly the present pros pect. According to the Foreign Secretary, the Northerns were beaten till they could be beaten no longer. They had exhausted defeats. They travelled in the long lane of disaster till they came to the in evitable turning. For all this the American Government will some day claim credit, showing that all its seeming reverses were cunningly planned expedients for ultimate success. There was once upon a time a charlatan who professed drawing teeth without pain. When the credulous patient was in his hands he would give a tug at the grinder with his instrument, and, in reply to the roar and angry complaint that followed, say, Now that was merely to show you Cartwright's method, that you should see the difference between his and mine. Another tug, and another roar, and the ex planation that the pain was only to exhibit Spence's method, and so on till the tooth hung by a thread, when the quack mid, Now you shall have a speci men of my method, and whipped the tooth out without more pain. And so President Lincoln, if he ever succeeds in extracting the tooth, will say that Bull's Run was only to show Burnside's me thod ; the period of inaction, M'Clellan's ; Frede ricksburg, Hooker's; and that his own conduct of affairs commenced when the bunglers were all dis posed of. Upon the breaking out of the war we repeatedly expressed our opinion that the North could not keep any very large force permanently in the field. They have succeeded in doing this to a greater degree than we thought possible, but the voluntary levies are now fairly exhausted, and the Government cenfesses that its only remaining re source is conscription. How that will work we shall soon see. But if it gives soldiers, it will give such soldiers as will full surely revenge their forced service by tremendously increasing the demoralisa tion already existing. In the memoirs of a French veteran just published it is shown what a canker in the armies of Napoleon was the rapine, which had become a condition of their existence, and cause of their dissolution. If this was the case with the armies of France, how will it be with those of America under a di sc i p li ne so muc h l axer , and with a national propensity so much stronger to insubor dination ? T o b e sure , i t may b e sa id that robbery is the order of the day in the Federal States, that every one who can is pillaging, and that the soldier only does on a small scale what contractors and crea tures of the Government are doing on a great scale ; but when men with arms in their hands follow this prevailing fashion they are apt to cut out more work than is bargained for, and woe to their employers, with the wolf by the ears, which they can neither hold nor let go. One day the conscripts' turn may come, and they may say to the (government, "You made us soldiers against our will, and soldiers we will now remain against your will, and help our selves to indemnities for our forced services." For law and liberty in America sad times are too evi dently in store, " bad begins and worse remains behind." One good effect has been brought about by this war. It used to be the reproach of quiet citizens that in their security they delighted in the account of battles, and could hardly be satisfied with any amount of killed and wounded. This is certainly no longer the case. The American war has surfeited with carnage, and the battles, one just like another, have lost all interest. The imagination cannot grasp or follow things on so large a scale. The high numbers are confounding. In a word, the American war has become a nauseous drug, and many people have resolved to hear no more about it till it is over, like the Irish traveller in the sacked town, who gave his order as he took to his bed, " Call me when it is done." But when is it to be done ? Mr. Seward tells all in Europe who desire a restoration of peace, for the renewal o f commer cial prosperity, to withdraw support and favour from the insurgents, as if these were the only obsta cles to the termination of the war. Leave us to ourselves, he says. But have the favour and support been all on one side ? Have they not been p ret t y equally divided, the South getting the largest share of the favour, the North the largest share of the support in the substantial shape of arms, mun i t i ons of war, and the raw material of soldiers in many thousands of emigrants ? There is al ways some r eason for not succeedingin a confli c t . " If it had not been for this or that, I should have thrashed hile,"says every foiled combatant ; and Mr. Seward's appeal to Europe betrays the consciousues of diffi culty at the bottom of all his vaunts of success. COURT JOURNAL —MO Archduke Maximilian is very wisely hesitating as to his acceptance of the Mexican throne, holdinwouldreality ambitious ti hotbed or r f The Archduk e h as consulted his brother, the Emperor a of Austria, and his father-in-law, the Kin , S of the Belgians, on the subj ect; and the latter Monarch, who is ever ready to give his friendly advice and services to those of his family who seek it, cannot fail to point out to his relative the dangers and disagreeables which would ensue upon his ac ceptance of the French offer. It is very clear that, without a lengthened occupation by French troops, the Mexicans will never become willing subjects of a foreign Prince; but, however undesirable this may ho, the Archduke Maximi lian's rule would be the only security which Europe would possess of the French occupation not becoming a perpetual one. In case of the Archduke's refusal, a French Prince will undoubtedly supply his place, and Mexico, in that case, will be nothing better than an appanage of the Imperial throne of France. "While the Archduke Maximilian has been thus debating a proposal so momentous both to himself and to Europe, his brother has been actively engaged in no • gotiations of even greater importance, and which deeply concern the future prospects acd welfare of Germany. The Conference at Frankfort has been brought to a close, but not without having been productive of a great amount of utility. It is true that Prussia steadfastly declines to accept the proposals of the Austrian Emperor, and that one or two minor Princes of no influence or note whatever have fol lowed in the suit of the King, to whom they are tied by personal or pecuniary interests ; but, nevertheless, the re mainder of the German Sovereigns have made up their minds to adopt the Austrian programme in its chief par. titulars ; and even if the union should be a partial one, it will certainly be a source of greater strength to the differert elements that compose the great German nation. Nor were the deliberations of the thirty Crowned Heads solely con fined to the consideration of German Unity, for, although only a secondary object, the Polish question was duly deliberated upon in the private interviews which the Emperor of Austria and the Grand Duke of Saxe-Coburg held with the remainder of the German Princes. One and all they concurred in the policy adopted by Austria, and, such as it is, they lend their influence to support the three Great Powers in the measure which they have adopted towards Russia for the benefit of the Polish nation. Russia, friendless and unsympathised with by any other nation, except Prussia, would not dare to press matters on to active warfare, in which, with all her power, she would certainly have to succumb to the united forces of the remainder of Europe. But while we see every cause for congratulation at the time adopted by the German States as regards their own interests and those of Poland, we cannot but deplore the policy which they seem inclined to pursue towards Den mark and tSchleswig-Holstein. Without attempting to plunge into the unfathomable mysteries of the eternal sub ject on which Scandinavia and Germany are at such com plete variance, it needs no argument to show that Denmark is in every way justified in retaining her hold upon th e Schleswig-Hol s f e i n prov i nces. S ure ly, while they are still matter of dispute, the party in possession cannot be ax. pected to deliver them up to the rival complainant, and Denmark has done all that could be reasonably expected of her in offering to submit the question to the consideration of a general conference. Should Germany refus e thi s very fair proposal, we cannot be surprised at the Ki ng and people of Denmark resolving to maintain their rights vi et arm's ; and it is gratifying to observe that Sweden and Norway, with a noble spirit of generosity and self-sacrifice which is not often met with in the transactions of nations, hove de termined upon lending every assistance to the Danes, who claim the same origin as themselves , h ave the same re ligion and manners, and whose language is only a slight different language from that spoken by the Swedes and Nor- , wegians, In the deplorable event of wir between Germany and the Scandinavian Powers the duly of England would undoubtedly be one of strict neutrality, but there can be no question as to which side our sympathies would incline. Iflctigre a certain awkward Danish despatch, which has now become matter of European notoriety, our Government would know this, and no Minister, whether Liberal or Con servative, would dare lend the slightest assistance to the enemies of Denmark. Nevertheless, we trust that the good sense of the Austrian Emperor will avert this threatened calamity, and that he will endeavour to keep intact that admiration and sympathy which he has excited in this country by his bold attitude in Polish affairs, and his un flinching determination to grant his subjects a liberal and truly constitutional system of gcvernment. WILLS AND BEQUESTS. (From the Illustrated London News.) The will of Mrs. Margaret Stancomb, of Trow. , bridge, Wilts, was proved in the London Court by her son, Mr. Wm. Stancomb, the surviving execu tor. The personal estate was sworn under £120,000. The testatrix died in April last, and was the relict of the late Mr. Wm. Stancomb. The . will bears date 1845, and a codicil 1852, and another 1860. Her property she directs to be divided into six equal parts, leaving to her son andfive daughters a share each. A legacy is left to the Sunday-school con nected with the Baptist chapel at Trowbridge, at which the testatrix attended, and a suin is to be expended in clothing and other gifts for . poor mem bers of the congregation. Legacies anei annuities are also left to her servants. The will of Major- General Sir Joshua Jebb, K.C.8., of The Elms, Falham, was proved in London by the executors, Mr. Samuel Henry Jebb, the testator's brother, and the Rev. Charles Campbell, the testator's brother in-law. The personal property was sworn under £30,000. Sir Joshua entered the Royal Engineers in 1812, became colonel in 1855, major-general in 1860, had served in America in 1812-13, and retired on full-pay. Sir Joshua held the offices of Sur veyor•Gieneral of Prisons, Inspec;tor•-General of Military Prisons, and Chairman of the Directors of Convict Prisons. Sir Joshua, who was in his 70th year, died in June last. His will bears date, 1854, and there are two codicils, dated 1858 and 1860. To his wife, Lady Amelia (who is the daughter of the second Earl of Chichester), he leaves a liberal annuity and a portion of the furniture, wines, &c. To his son, Mr. Joshua Gladwyn Jebb, he has de vised his real estate, and after leaving a pecuniary legacy to each of his three daughters, directs the residue of the personal estate to be divided between them and his son. COUNTRY MARKETS. I , NOTTINGHAM—SATURDAY. There was a fair show of wheat to-day, and the condi tion was good. A fair demand, t nd prices is over late rates. —White wheat, from 43s to 50s ; ;red wheat, 40s to 475• Barley—malting, 36s to 40s ; grinding, 30s to 325. Oats, old, at 24s to 31s Od ; new, 22s to 275. Beans sold at 38 5 to 43s per qr. ; new, 33s to 425. GRANTHAM -SATURDAY. Old white wheat, 44s to 46s ; red, 43s to 45s per 36st. ; new white, 453 to 475; new, 44s to 465. Malting barley, —s to —s per qr ; grinding, 30s to 32s ; oats, old, 26s t) 28s ; new, 24s to 26s ; beans, 40s to 42s ; peas, 38s to 40s. A fair supply, N and the demand was RWICH—SATIIRDAy more active than for sometime past. Prices is up. There were several samplc 3 of new barley offered. White wheat. 46s to 47s 1 Red wheat 43s to 453 Malting barley ...38s to 40s j Chevalier barley 36s to 37 8 Distilling do 338 to 35s Oats.. 24, to 283 Flour, 31s Od to —s Od per sack from the miller. LEICESTER—SATURDAY, There was a moderate show of wheat to-day at our market, and there was a fair demand at the following rates —Old white wheat, 45s to 50s ; new, 46s to 48s per 3 6 stone. Old red, 41s to 48s per 36 stone. Barley, malting, new, 34s to 38s per qr.; grinding, 28s to 31s ; old oa t 27s to 3N; new oats, 24s to 26 s p er 24 stone. Beans, new, 38s to 42s per 38 stone ; flour, 30s to 35s per 20 stone. NORTHAMPTON—SATURDAY. White wheat, 45sj to 47s ; red, 40s to 45s ; fine, 45 to —s per qr. Barley, 34s to 28s—grinding. 29s to 3 Ss; Oats, 30s to 32s per 24 stone. Beans, 31s to 40e. ret ° ' 36s to 42s per qr. YORK--SATURDAY. The supply of wheat a t mar k e t to -d ay was mo derate, and late prices were maintained for all sorts. Wheat, red 44s to 46s Oats.... 2os to 240 White do .488 to 50s Beans 38, to 42 6 Barley .30s to 3.2 s Peas .... sto ---4 Malt, 62s to 64s pe r qr . ; rye, 32s per qr ; flour, 33 3 to 3os per sack. Foreign Mail Packet List. MAILS DUE. Australia and Mauritius, via Southampton. Sept. 18. Marseilles.. via . :.! , ept. 12 kirazil and Cape Yards, by British packet. Oct. 5 . 4 , Cape of Good Hope, Ascension, and St. Helena.. Sept. 2 8 : China, Penang, an d Singapore, via Southampton. Sept. 1 ,, via Marseill es ...Sept. 1,4. Falkland Islands ********* •• ********* Gibraltar, via So u th ampton Sept. 10. t India (Calcutta), an d Ceylon, via Southa m pt on Sep- 8 . India Bomb , 1 2 via Marseilles Sept. . ( ay), via Southampton Sept. 10 .7 via Mar b eill es pt. ... Portugal.... ~ . Nialta, Egypt and Oct. 5; , Aden, via Southa m pt on Sept. Iv via Marseilles Sept. 4' Newfoundland *** ** S e pt. li . Oporto and Vigo ... U. S. and British N. America, by by U.S. packet.... • Brit. packet.... Sept. 11' by Canadian packet. Sept. 4 • W.C. of Africa, Madeira, and Teneriffe „S ep t. 1. , Bahamas, via New York Sept. `2- 4 a • Mexico.. Sept. i°' All parts of West Indies, including Chili, Peru, } S ep t. 140 California. and Britisk Columbia. MADELINE SMITH.-A correspondent of a northern journal states that Madeline Smith, whose trial for the murder of her sweetheart by peison created so Eau c ,, sympathy and interest, has been c om f or t a bl y marr i e d, an d may occasionally be seen on a Sunday, along with her 1 11115° band, in a church in the town of Linlithgow. [ADVERTISEMENT.]—Consumption, all nervous, bilie g ! liver, and stomach co m pl a i n t s, i n every stage, are on ly ag gravatea and accelerated by d rugs o f every description, butts perfemly curable by Du Barry's health restoring !Wye° Arabica Food, as proved by thousands of c ases w hich ba d i t been considered hopeless. We quo t e a few.—Cure No. 6 2,91 : . Miss Lange, 18 yea rs o f age, cured after the medical men ha t abandoned all hopes of her recovery from the last stage Pulmonary consumption, with fearful cough, expectorati on. exhaustion, spitting of blood, perspirations, hollow cheeka. emaciated to a skeleton. She is now, thank God, a perfeet l i healthy, blooming, fleshy girl.--N. Lange, Commissaire de taNynody.epa4r6.l,2,:ioa.l di s eas ed dl ei deafness. —Cure , In . J leus a ns m .g e l a ,csu ß pri o et h ,t i e Nng r o t s.o,4fo7b:ll2o}lo'.rdircm liv er ie, sY Police.S e Surrey, , derangement, o C f u Cure, h Elizabeth Jacobs, of extreme nervousness, indigestio n. gatherings, low spirits, and nervous I ancies.—Cure, " 54,816. lbe Rev. James T. Campbell, Fakenham, Norfolk. of indigestion and torpidity of the liver, which had resisted all medical treatment. In tine, 11b, 2s 9d ; 21b, 48 6d ; 6117 ' lls; 121 b, 225; 241 b, 40s. Barry du Barry and Co., No. 77. Regent-street, London ; also Fortnum and Mason; and all grocers and chemists in every town of the United Kingdom. [ ADVER TISEMENT.] — HoIIoway's Pills.—Enormous P ° ' pularity.—These Pills through their own merits 1 10° gained a favour with the public, which is altogether un precedented in medical history. The reason of their sue' cess lies obviously in the power they possess of purifying the blood, and th ere by brin g ing themselves into relation with every diseased, disordered, or debilitated portion of tli! body. A few timely doses will in many instances prevetl s the occurrence of disease ; but if the malady he a i r egdf established these Pills will promote its cure in the easiest ~l medicine o lo n. w t a o y t ' b s emrelief is a g r i e ve w n r t a o pP rx ei most complete, and most direct manner. The plaines t instructions o c n b s bo fo x r ; ü b s y in merest stomach-ache, and safely to the int ensest internal inflammation. agtterinotil Births. FITZGERALD.—On the 2d i ns t ., at 47, Sloane-street, Ladi Gerald Fitzgerald, of a son. FUTVOTE.—On the 3d inst., at 8, Leinster •square, park, the wife of Fred. Futvoye. Esq., of a son. HOWELL.—On the sth inst., at The Retreat, Lower r r- °°tm ing, the wife of Arthur Howell, of twin sons. Marriages. DUNDA.S—PORTAL—On the 3d inst , at Laverstoke troll Hants, C a p ta i n T. Dundas, son of the late Rbt. Duna to of Arni s t on, to Jane Eliza, youngest dau g ht er of the '''. John Portal, Esq., of Freefolk Priors, Hants. GUBLINS—M`MAIroN —On the 3d inst , at St. Steppe - 4 . Dubli n , Joseph Ciabbins, Esq., of Kilf r u s h, co . Limed , to Fran ces Th omasine, second daughter of Sir Beres B. 111( Mahon, Bart. Deaths. DROWN.—On the 4th inst., at West Brompton, Mr. 1 1311/ brown, late of 2, James-street, Adelphi, aged 65. GlLsox.—On the 3d inst., a t L e ith, C ap t a i n J. C. Gil 6 ° . aged 36. HARRIS.—On the sth inst., at Staines-road, Hounsl as6 Miss Caroline C. H arr i s , aged 24. PERRIN.—On the 4th inst., Ellen, wife of Henry St °ll Perrin, of Old Change. &GAIL—Ott the 4th inst., Hulsall Segar, Esq., Herb ert House, Seaforeh, n ear Li ve rpool, aged 79. WILLANs.—On the 4th inst., William Winans, Esq. , fo Huddersfield, aged 63. YARDLEY.—On the 27th ult., at Boulogne-sur reef Martha, relict of the late John Joshua Yardley, li 8 q" Piaci, heath. 14'1' London : Printed and PuMialied by WILLIAM ANDR— i 0 2 ; of No. 112, Strand, Printer, at THE SUN Office Strand, in the Precinct of the Bavoy, in the CoUuvi Ididdiesex,7l.londaY, September 7, WI `. • • •