The Sun. — London, England, 1854-05-26 00:00:00

and four places ; of sheet through, paddlo and.two d crutch tarboard Dreoastle knocked LION. ollowiug 3omplete ;ion will attack itains by Austria and de een and ties have north of 131 the asser, in ground piratical ) Greece and the , bellion; ,era wh° e•publio join the [ by the new Go• oniteurr us have now on ;o rapid ) o rders troops• ern side " , Lys that ors to Greece► Vestern 1, says a depar aid that 1-orn the who ha s known invity ons be• licy and 3lessur e ferences nu Con• )0 ndeot acted at 3 recon - Rome• sonagee told, * Our cor 1 direct yotieg hag 0 ° ficultiee ,ho two other. ;rests of f view ,s of the i air* 11 an J ,1 Shan : band on the Bf. 900. no, 11A! y a pa' chi 6l follovt. ,t fora' ith Art. Jo inistra bscriboi Au a )r •sed hf 41 - k! T NE' 1 ' 1'7.8- . I'D CORN EXCHANGE. Since Mon lay there has been a decided increase in the arrivals of English wheat up to our market, coastwise and by land carriage. To-day's market was moderate. The -- attendance of buyers being limited, the demand for all kinds of wheat of home produce ruled h eav y , and in some BL"' instances prices were rather lower than on Monday. We were well supplie with foreign wheat. Selected sam soid at barely previous rates. Low and middling Tialities were considered is per quarter lower, with a dull inqui ry . The show of barley was but moderate, yet the demand Was heavy, at barely stationary prices. In malt very little was doing, on former terms. With oats we were well supplied. Sales.progressed slowly, and the quotations were rather easier. Beaus, peas, and Sour were unaltered. ARRP7AL% THIS WIKZE. Cuglish Irish Foreign Wheat. 1,133 Barley. 120 Oats. no %. 22 2,790 843 1 1,660 25 - 15, 70 - - 19,910 7 ,Oaks St. 11,6701n1 40,8)0 2,550 SMITHFIELD. The supply of beasts here to-day being very mPderate, and the attendance of buyers on the increase, the demand for that description of stock ruled brisk, at a further ad vance in the quo t a tions of 2d par 81 bs. The top figure was 58 per Ms. We were but moderately supplied with sheep and lambs. Prime Down breeds mo.ed off steadily, at full prices. Otherwise the demand was in a sluggish state, but we have no actual decline to notice in the currencies. Calves and pigs changed hands on former terms. Milch cows were firm, at from ltd. to 201. each, including their small calf. - Per Sibs to sink the ofials. s. d. s. 4.1 s. d. s. d. Inferior Beasts.... 3 Bto 3 1 0P r i me S o uthdown 410 5 0 Second quality. ..4 0 4 21Large erso. calves 4 0 4 8 Prime larg e oxen' 4 4 4 6 Crime small d 0... 410 5 6 Prime Scots, &c. 4 8 5 0 Large h0g5..... 3 8 4 4 Inferior Sheep ...3 6 3 101 Small por kers 4 6 410 Second quality ...4 0 4 4 Packling calves... 23 0 29 0 Priine crse.-wlled.4 6 4 81Quarter old picr3 22 0 28 0 L am b s ss 4d to 6s b Bd, TOTAL SUPPLY. FOREIGN SUPPLY. Beasts rigs ... ••• • • ...... alO .. ••••• • • • • • NEWGATE AND LEADENHALL. Generally speaking, the trade ruled steady to-day, a follows :-- Per 81bs by the carcase. • s. d. s. d: s. d. s. d. Beef, inferior ...... 3 4 3 6 Mutton, Inferior 3 8 3 10 Do., middling ..... 3 8 3 10 Do., middling .... el 0 4 4 Do., prime large .4 04 2 Do., prime 46 5 2 4 8 Do., do. pma11....4 2 4 4 i Veal 3 10 Pork, large 364 4, Pork, small 464 10 Lamb BOROUGH HOP. The plantation accounts not being very favourable, there is rather more business doing in our market, and the quotations have an upward tendency. Some parties call the duty 130,000/. This week's imports are 26 bales from Antwerp, and 50 from New York. The quotations are as follow :—mid and East Kent pockets, W. 15s to 8'• 10s ; Weald of Kent ditto, W. 5s to 7/. Os ; Suess ditto, 5/. 5s to 6t. 12s per cwt. COLONIAL. SUGAR.—There has been more activity in the market generally, but the tone has been decidedly flatter. British Plantation has been at a slight decline. Barbadoes at auction realised 390 to 40s for fine yellow, and 33s 6d to 38s 6d .for low to good. St. Lucia went at. 32s 64 to 34s for low to fine brown, and at 33s to 37s for refining. St. Kitt's brought 34s 61 to 3.15, and crystalised Demerara 3 78 to 40s 6d for mid to fine yellow. East India. —Bengal privately sold at full rates, and at auction 32s to 33s 6d were obtained for low and mid. Penang is fully ls. lower, low to fine brown selling at 30s to 32s 6d, and low to fine yel low at 32s Gd to 36s 6tl per cwt: Mauritius went at rather lower prices, viz., fine and good yellow 35s 6d to 38s, low to mi.t 34s 355, ord to fine brown 30s to 339 6,1, very good 28s 6d to 29s 6d, low to fine refining 32s to 36s 64, and grainy at 36s to 425. Foreign---Porto Rico has been' depressed about 6,1 per cwt, low to mid heavy grey and yello w selling at 35s to 37s 6 1, good mid to good at 33s to 39s 64, low to fine yellow at 35s to 41s ; and fine at 40s to 41s per cwt. Manilla was taken in above the value, good brown clayed at 35s to 35s 6d, and ord to good Muscovado at 31s to 325. Washed realised 29s 6d to 30s.per cwt. COFFEE.—Plantation Ceylon has been in brisk request, at a slight decline ; fine brought 67s 6,1, mid to good mid 58s to 593 6d, low mid 565" to 57s 61, low mid anti mid 5 - is to 595, good 60s to 60s 6d, small 52s to 549, triage 433 to 6 38, and peaberry 53s 61 _to 648 6d. Native also was weaker : good ord old import publicly sold at 43s to 43s 61 per cwt. Privately good ord went at 435, and fine ord at 4 48 Gd. At a subsequent sale good ord was taken in at 4 38 sa to 445, but good sold at 635. Madras orti brought 468 to 46a -6d, Jamaica mid small 543, and Mocha mid 58s 64. COCOA.—Trinidad found buyers at 36s to 36s 6,1 for mid greyish red. SPlCEt.—Pimento has been dull, mid coarse being taken in at 50. Nutmegs declined 2d to 4d, but clo%fes have been steady. Mace realised former values, but pepper has been rather lower. Good ord small to laid dark old Jamaica ginger sold at 44s to 765, and Malabar ord rough mouldy at 20.3 to 20s 6d. RlCE.—This article has been dull at 3d decline, ord to good Moonghy selling at 9s 61 to 10s. White was taken in at 12s esl for good mid, and Bombay mid small dusty white at 12s. COTTON.—The market has been inactive. S. -- V little has been done. Bengal B.per _Bengal 8. bart Town. Sailed—lsaiah Crowell, for Frederickshal. ...ALTPETRE.— very cent. refraction was taken at 40 s, for mid. Bomb - ay af I,)s, ' 25 for 14 to 184 per cent. refraction.. HEMP.—The inquiry is limited, at 67 / per ton , and jute St. has declined. 10 TEA.—Prices are nominal, owing to the restricted St. 25 business doi n g. TALLOW.—The market is quiet, at 61s 6d per cwt. for 20 P.Y.C. on the spot. . 20 GREEN FRIIIT.—The improvement in the market is sustained, the backward state of vegetation being in favour of foreign fruit. Some parcels of Lis bon oran g es, per 20 steamer, sold by Keeling and Hunt at public sale were ..• taken freely by the trade. A novelty in Bra zil oran g es has been received andsapproved of. Lemons and Tints of all 20 kinds in better dem and, and the war in the East is likely .0. to interfere with further shipments of the latter article. 25 LLOYD'S SHIPPING-(THIS DAY.) ISi LONDON, May 26.—Wind this day at Noon, S. ; light breeze, and cloudy. OFF HASTINGS, May 25.—Pio Nono, from Batavia. Cowln, May 25.—Wind, S.W. Arrived - Oscar 1., , from Batavia ; Peter Anderson, Callao ; Joven Marian, ; Trinidad de Cuba ; Auguste, Cienfuegos. PORTSMOUTH, May 25.—Wind, S.S. W. to S.W. Sailed —Snake, for Mo ; adore. SALCOMBS, May 25.—Wind, W.S.W. Sailed—Rising Sun, for Cadiz. FALMOUTH, • May 25.—Wind, W. Arrived—Friends, from Paraiba ; Lieut. Patterson, Buenos Ayres ; Fadreas Minde, Monte Video, for Liverpool ; Eric, Matanzas ; Tayrsaad (Egyptian steamer), London , for Alexandria ; Frigga, Pernambuco ; Boadicea, Eapatoria ; Annette Ca tharini, Porto Rico ; Demetrius, Rio Janeiro ; Alana, Pernambuco ; Alert, Smyrna. off Port—Gladiator, from Moulmaiu ; Johannes. Samarang, and sailed for Ham burgh ; Zealous, Callao ; Germania, Porto Rico, and sailed for Altona. PLYMOUTH, May 24.—Wind, W.S.W. Arrived—Water - Witch, from Corunna • Ewartung, Wismar. Orr DARTMOUTH, May 44.—Surrey, from Port Philip. QUEENSTCiWN, May A.—Wind, variable. Arrived — Matador, from Mauritius ; Seriganatam, Callao ; Tomatin, do. ; Naparima, do. ; Graf von Brandenburg, Baltimore ; Grace Loncrstaff, Manilla, and left for Greenock; Asia, Callao ; Bud, do., anti left for London. CORK, May 24. Wind, N. Arrived—Mayflower, from Tarsons ; Challenger, Samson, and Mecurio, from Con stantinople. NV/ TRRFORD, May 24.—Wind, W.N.W. Arrived — Margaret, from Trinidad. SCILLY, May 23.—Arrived—Gazollo, from Mauritius. MEMEL, May 19.—Her Majesty's steamers Anaphion and Conflict arrived here yesterday with the following Russian merchant ships, which they had captured in Liban har bour, and brought them into this port, namely :—Alex ander, of Libau ; Louise Atnalia, Polka, Johann, Carl, and Louise,,all of Riga ; Livonia and Active, of Pernau ; and Nicolay, of Windau. May 22.—Weather, fine ; wind, easterly ; 14 ft. 6 in. water on the bar. HM. steamer Conflict is lying in the roadstead. Trump, May 19.—The Uuionen, of and bound to Struer, from Hartlepool, was stranded at the entrance of the Agger Canal last evening ; crew savd. Orr ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH.) LIVERPOOL, Friday, 10.30 a.m. Wind, E.S.E. ; light wind, and dull. Arrived—John Patchett, from Ceylon ; Emilie, i nn ; Alciope, Due A yres ; J ess i e M unn , ew Orleans ; an d Auguste Mathilde, Mazat- A lONIAN BANS.-At a meeting of this bank, held yes terday, the dividend declared was at the rate of 5 per e int., and the report and accounts were adopted. The o lairman (Mr. 0. Farrer) explained the position of busi ness, and the only discussion was in relation to the de sirableness of extending operations to Malta, Naples, and other localities. It was stated, however, that this course would be impracticable under the existing charter and that it was not considered pint is to attempt the ex tensive arrangements required to effect it. THE MILITIA GARRISON AT THE TOWER.-It appears, from the recollections of old veterans now surviving the late war, that no militia regiment has been honoured with the Tower garrison since the war in the reign of George 111., when the corps honoured with the guard of the Royal regalia and other valuables WAS that of the Royal Wiocleor (BY SUBMARINE AND EUROPEAN TELEGRAPH. ) GRAVESEND, Friday, a.m.10.4.5 Wind, W.S.W. ; tide, two hours fool ; Oe. Arrived, 25th—Ocean Gem, from Ciit h o o f Good Hope ; Anna Maria, Gothenburg ,_• K agra Cherbourg ; Anne Fisher, Ceylon ; k ar . ; _Carolinda, 2erYMarstrand ; Gipsy QUe3n, St. Übes : Dart, Jersey • Collingwood, Ran noon ; Vsabel 11., Santander ; Lively, ' Guernsey ; arl s Caen ; Johanne, Swinemunde ; Montero Oporto ; Lever e ee Stettin ; Wards, Dantzio ; John Bull (a), Hamburgh , Alert, Guernsey ; Constance, Melbourne • Derwentwater, , L Hobart Town ; Hero, Launceston ; Ablgal, Guernsey ; Cornelius, Trinidad • Earl of Chester, Callao. Arrived, 26th—Solo (s), from Havre; Irene, Adelaide ; City of Boulogne (s), Boulogne ; City of London (s), Dun kirk. 5 Sailed—Alar (a), Dun kirk ; ' Chriatiana, Drontheim ; 25 City of Rotterdam (s), Harl in g en. 20 Frida DEAL, y, 9.35 a.m. 10 Wind, W.R.W. ; moderate and cloudy. 10 Passed—Era (not Anna Dixon), from Porto Rico for 50 London, reported last night ; Clara, Colombo ; Devon- 5 Hong shire, Madras ; Electric , Cadiz ; • Enterprise, kong Ann Holzberg, Mooltan, Koh - i•n oor, Zetus, and Aber- 100 foyle, Calcutta ; Apolline, Jamaica; Christine, Constan- 5 tinople ; Gla , liator, Moulmein ; Despatch, Ceylon ; Bro- 5 there. Algoa Bay—all, for London; _ assor eang, Batavia. 4 P for Texel. 20 Anchored—South Carolina, from London for Havre ; 25 Dublin, London for Nassau ; Maitland , London for 1:10- 25 1 Sll.\ _P►:E MARKETS. (THIS DAY.) BRITISH RAILWAYS. IPald.l RAILWAYS. Closing Prices yesterday. I Business dons St• this day. 50 St. .00 lAberdeen Asabg Yottng.•Bost and Junct all Belfast & Ballymena. all Birming. Wolverh. & Stour Valley 2S 13irkenhd. Lanesh & Cheshire Junet all Do. Chesil. & birk., £5O and £25 Cons. 184 Do., £2O 30 Rlyth &Tyuc original £25 (isscl. at £45, 100 Bristol and Exeter.. 100 Caledonian all Chester & Holyhead. all Cork and Bandon.. all Cork, Black, & Pass 12 Cornwall Crieff Junction 45 Dublin&BelfastJunc all Dundee Perth dzAber deer Junction..,.. . all Do. New all East Anglian all Do., (£lB E & all Eastern Counties all Eastern Union, A Stock 100 De., B. Stock 8/. Do., New A •• 100 - East Lancashire 100 Edinburgh & Glasgo" 54 Ediub. and Peebles 100 Edin. Pith &Dundee 1 Forth & Clyde June. 100 Glasgow &S. Western 100 Great Northern Stk WO Do., A. Stock 100 Do., B. Stock. 100 Gt. Sth. &West.(lre 100 Great Western 12 Irish South-eastern all Lancaster & Carlisle 11t Do., Thirds 2 Do. New Thirds__ 100 Laucash.andYorksh 18:, Do., Fifths 11; 1)3., Wst. Riding Um all Leeds Northern I all Liv.ersby.&Southpt all London & Blackwel; I 8 Loud. Tilb. & Sthend. 100 Loud. Bright & S.Cst. 100 Loud. and N. Westn, ) 12 Do. Fifths ) Do.lo/.5h.,M&8...t 21, Do. Eighths 100 London audS. Westn ), 423 Do., £5O ) 34 Do., £4O 5 all Ludrry&Coleraine 5' all. Lududrry. & Enuisk. t. 100 lianch.Shef.& Lineln 2s 44 Do., Man. & Lin. Un. t. 100 Nlidland t. 100 Jo. Birmng. &Derby 0 474 G. West. (Ire.) 5 171 Do. Half Shares O all , Newcastle & Carlisle: O 100 Newmarket 6,j ' Do., Bury Extension, 5 'l7i Nwpt.Aberg. & Hrfd O '7i Newry &Enniskillen O all Newry Warrenpoint and Rostrevor It. 100 Norfolk i 0 31„ Northn.Connties it. 100 North British L 6 16 North Devon, No. 1. 16 all Do., No. 2 8 all ,)0., 4 A Deferred 8 8 Do., B Guaranteed 50 all North London 10 54 Do. New £lO 10 11 le N.&S.Wstru.,llamp • stead, and City Ju 10174 North Staffordshire 10 all North Western 1.0 10 N. &S. Westru. June 10 . 1 Nuneaton, Hinckley, and Leicester.. St. 100 Oxford, Worcester, & ' 'Wolverhampton 20 21 2s Portsmouth St. 100 Seettish Central St. 100 ScottislillidlanJ St. 100 Shrewsbury & Bittng St. 100 Do. .14. &N. Westeri. Guarantead St GLI4 10 10 Sl,rewsby. dt Batt:J - (1 265 all Shrewshy. dzCLeste: (N. W. Min 134 all Do. naives,: a 20 all Do. Oswestry 20 Shropshire Union Do. A, B, CAD,full) paid up at per cent. 50 all south Devon St. 100 south Eastern 50 all south Wales . 20 15 1. Yrksh. & Riv. Dun 5 Do 2/ 2s 3taines, Wok &Wok all Stockton & Darling 16 Stockton & Hartlepl 100 rare Vale 8 Do. £lO shares. 100 Do. Pref., No. 21 Thames Haven Dock and Railway 17 Vale of Neath all Waterfd. & Kilkenny all Watcrford&Limerick 16 West Cornwall I West End of London and Crystal Palace all West Loudon 51s. MinhWu &Croydon 100 YorkNewctl.&Berw. 20 Do. Extensions Lit Do. G.N. E. Purchase 100 York &N. Midland - 4i ... ea • 8 - 9 13 —l2 disl .5 - 8 - 90 - 56 - 14 - 9 -; 43 7 - 8 -16 i - - 60 - 53 - 24 - 122 8o 87 10 12 10 12 1, 604 61 8 -- 7t ct L 2 • --i24 • * if 8a P .01a 1026 —97 t 16d f d 1 1 d 776 a 786 12 lla 10 —9.; .9 - 20; 59 - 59, 32 - 34 4d- 7 - 5 tt 2t - 21 6 8 46 48 34 bi 31 ... 32 ~ - .. 66 54 . a AP 5i 40' " I - 76 .• • • 29 - 31 85 87 52 54 53 - 58 53 - 6 8 - 24' 13 - 1 5 6i - 74 10 - 4 - 3tti 15 611 e 2 34 35 4 21 4 30 - 32 ... - .•• .4 - ... ~. ... .. 3 - 3i 17 alB 4 - 5 20 22 fit - 6 i 65~ USA 8t -- aid 5k 4id 466 -47 c, FOREIGN. 9 Antwerp&Rotterdam 3 3olgian Eastu. Juno. 8 Beziers to GIVASSeS&AC 2s. Bombay, Baroda, and Central Indii,Serip ... Central of Italy all Charleroi& Erquelin all Demerara 14 Dijon and Besanc or 9 Dutch Rhenish . all East Indian 2 Do Extension all . Indian Peninsula 10 Juuct. of Franc, 7. Jrd. Trunk of Canal. 3-) Do. Debentures all Do. do 10 Gt. Central of France all .1 - t,.\Vostern of Canada Shares Do. Bonds (Ist is.)'s7 all Hamilton & Toronto all Do. 6 per cent. 5 [rake Const. & Basle all iLucca & Pistoja sp. c. pref 15 Luxembourg 10 Do. (Railway) 2 Do. Prof 3 Do. (Canal) 5 Do. 6p. et. pref 8 Lyons and Geneva 12 Lyons & Mediterran. 13! siadras 33!, Maria Antonia all Do. do. New 2 klelbourne Dk. &Ry all Niamur & Liege (wit, interest) all Do. (ex interest) all northern of France : • Do. 201. 3p. c Bds. all (ftny.B.& Ams.Slis., all NorweglanTrunkPre. 10 Paris and Lyons all Ditto Bonds all Paris and Orlaans all Paris and Rouen all Paris and StrasbouiT 10 ParisCaen & Chcrbrg. 101 Quebec & Richmond all llonen and Havre..... 12 Iloyal Danish 2 Royal Swedish all Sambre and Meuse 6 Do. 54 p. cent. Prof, '6 goutherr of France 8 St. Andrew's and Quebec (A) i all West Elvmders all Do riA per c. Prof 10 Western of France 7 West. of Switzerland 2 Wiesbadeu 15 Zealand 34 —3 d x.n 1 16 4 3 ci a it P P 44 4 ,1 14 2 p 1 d P *6 - 7d i -- i d in A. 19i_ par li 7 —9 p ~, ...'. ... dis 51 3} 3 1 1 1 lid 2 _.l d i . ... d par .•• ''.".. • • ~. •••• • • 7 - iii = ii - 9 16/ - 174p1 - 46 - 37 50i • 30ixd ... pm ... - i . d d .• 8 8i ••• '''.. Pin *i - 1- ';i 4 . ---- 5 - 1 , 1 3 ''6i :iia MISCELLANEOUS all kubin Coal and hot!' 174 Vustralian Agrieult. 14 Vustralsn.Peitie.Mail 8 kustraln. Royal Mail 4 qerlin Water Works 40 Brit. American Land 1 .hit. .St Coln. Sraeltg. _ _ and Reduction Co-. 32 I Clanada 5 _:rystal Palace lA DO. New I 2 jrystal Pal.of France 3 &stern Steam 20 El ectrit Telegrapii(X) all Do. (13) 1 Electric Teleg. of Ir 14 Gen. Steam Navigat 18 General Screw Steam 7 Erisl) Beet:cot Sugai 10 Magdalena St. Navig. all sat. Pat. Steam Fuel 3 Setberlands Laud 1 N. S. W. Coal & Inter. Steam Navigat. Co. all 'N. B. Australasian.; Do. New 10 grtli.ofEuropeSteani all Peel Rr. lid. & Mine. all Peninsular & Oriental 35 Do. Do. all Portland Iron Co 60 itoyal Mail Steam all Scot. Austral. Invest 25 South Austral. Land all Submar. Telegraph . all Do. Registered. • Vau Dieuwu Utud iai ::: 4711 47. 7 . ...... ••• • ...... ••• a 7-- - ii 80 - 85 6t - 7 7Gi 11 -11 31 •• '''''. ••• CT -- 18 - - 1 24] • . i •• --1 i 1 7 ii par— i dl .•• --- ••• i - iP 2 37 - 39 - 15 15 20 20 20 BO 50 2 100 1 25 561 Ir) 141 50 83i 8 St. St 25 74a k I s' 20 87 61 St. • 15 601 li lot 971 I I 671. 10 6 i 20 78 59h i I 5 32 i .2i 13 St 6 5 304 SO 150 per eeni • I 20 dig Bt. 20 25 I " pm2s 1 all 1 all Os. all l 0 2 V 3 6 1 al l 1 al l 1 al l 1 al l 50 all 1 all 20 13.6 35 241, * all !O 15 1 i 1 4 LO I all 5 I 1 ;5 all 5 all 2 all 2 all 3 all 1 all 3 all 1 all 1 all LO 9 1 all 1 All 1 all !O all i I ar .5 15 W 0 10 . i 1 all W 7 NA all 1 all 1 all 1 all 1 12s. 1 1 all THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY EVENING, MAY 26, 1854. I NIPERI A.IIIENT. Leasing Compass, Nosing Priem yesterday. Business this day. HOUSE OF COMMONS--(YESTERDAY.) The SPEAKER took the chair at four o'clock. I,ondon N. West. Caledon... NEW MEMBER. Mr. A. SMITH took the walls and his seat for Hertford shire, in the room of Mr. Halsey deceased. 93 - 93 - 96 PRIVATE BILLS. The following bills ware read a third time and passed:-- Bradford, Wakefield, and Leeds Railway ; Chester, Fara don, and Worthenbury Road ; East Lancashire, Lan cashire and Yorkshire, and Manchester and Southport Railways ; Leeds, Bradford, and Halifax Junction Rail- Towy Vale Railway ; Winchester and P e terefield Road ; Bradford, Wakefield, and Leeds Railway. at.Nrthn. Oaldonian. ~, se• D 0....... Westn Yk. New. Berw. V. 10.1 Md .•• ••• LOI - 103 50 - 52 25 -26 12 - 13 224 -23 i - PETITIONS. Petitions were presented by the Sheriffs of London and Middlesex at the bar in favour of the Oaths Bill ; by Mr. MILES from Chew, Magna, and other places in Somerset shire, in favour of closing public houses on Sundays ; by Mr. T. DIINCOMBE from six gentlemen connected with the commercial trade of t e metropolis complaining that though they are naturalised British subjects, British passports do not avail them in travelling in foreign countries ; by Mr. HEADLAM, from Newcastle-on-Tyne, - against church rates ; by Sir J. SHELLEY, from the proprietors of Lloyd's Weekly Newspaper, complaining of the stamp duty ; also a petition from St. Anne's, Westminster, praying for a bet ter water supply to the metropolis; by Mr. Alderman from certain inhabitants of Manchester, pray ing for the abolition of church rates. IRISH WORKHOUSES. D 0......... 3. Easton D 0......... 2i - 21 - • •• 89 - 90 54 - .56 Mr. BELLEW asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland, whether Government is ready to bring in any 'measure, in accordance with the prayer of petitions presented to Par liament, to enable poor law guardians to consolidate or very much to diminish the establishments in certain poor law unions in Ireland, by which gre*ater economy may bo effected without prejudice to the comfort of the inmates of said establishments. Sir J. YOUNG said undoubtedly the workhouse accom modation was much more than sufficient there were only 100,010 persons in these workhouses, w hereas they were ca p a ble of accommodating 314,030 ; but the Irish unions being unnsualy large, it would be greatly detrimental to the poor if any of these workhouses were abolished. SHIPPING BONDS. Mr. SCHOLEFIELD asked the Secretary of the Trea sury whether the commissioners have had under their con sideration the advisability of substituting for the numerous separate bonds now required for the shipping of certain g oods, a single bond from the captain or consignees of each ship ; and if so, whether he is prepared to state the deci sion at which they have arrived. Mr. WILSON said, such a proposal had been made to the Treasury, but the Treasury did not think it would be advisable to" accede to it. LETTER-CARRIERS. Mr. T. BUNCOMBE inTlired of the hon. Secretary to the Treasury when they might expect the report of the commission appointed to inquire into the grievances of the letter-carriers? Mr. WILSON said it was a mistake to suppose that the commission was appointed to inquire into the grievances of the letter carriers ; it was appointed to inquire into the whole state of the Post-office establishment, and the grievances of the letter-carriers had come before them in an incidental manner. The commission, how ever, had prepared their report, and he hoped , he should be able to present it in a very short time. OXFORD UNIVERSITY COMMISSION. Mr. WISE asked Lord John Russell, whether there is any foundation for the report that the Rev. George Raw linson and the Rev. Samuel William Wayte have been recommended to her Majesty's Government, as fit and proper persons to officiate as the Secretaries of the Oxford University Commission, should the bill now before the house be passed into a law ; also, whether, if the appointment of the Rev. Mr. Rawlinson be contemplated, her Majesty's Ministers are aware that that gentleman has described the Reformation as " so-called Reformation," and that a ma gazine published at Oxford he alluded to the appointment of a Parliamentary commission in the following terms, " We look upon the appointment of a commission as the very worst calamity that could possibly befall the univer shies. We can scarcely conceive of an event that would in flict greater injury, either upon the universities themselves or the country at large, than an i nquiry so instituted, and a reform so conducted. A Parliamentary Commission for such a purpose would, at all time! and under any cir cumstances, be a huge and terrible evil." Lord J. RUSSELL insisted that the question want be yond the limits of inquiry allowed by the rule of the house, and therefore he declined to answer it. BANKRUPTCY COMMISSION. Mr. IDEATING asked Lord John Russell, whether it was the intention of ter Majesty's Government to intro duce any measure, during the present session , fou nded on the recent' report of the Bankruptcy Commission. - Lord•e7. RUSSELL raplied in the negative. STAMPS ON . FOREIGN BILLS OF EXCHANGE. ad id In reply to Mr. MieSTERMAN, The CHANCELLPtt of the EXCHEQUER said the Government saw no reason to recede from their already expressed intention tnimpose a stamp duty on foreign bills of exchange. BUSINESS FOR TO-MORROW. Mr. DISRAELI asked Lord John Russell what business he proposed to take to-morrow. Lord J. RUSSELL replied that the Finance Bills, with the exception of the Excise Duties Bill, would be taken first, and the Oxford University Bill afterwards: RESOLUTIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC BUSINESS. Sir J. PAKINGTON wished to ask the noble lord when it would b 3 convenient for him to move the resolution agreed to by the committee on public business. Lord J. RUSSELL replied that next Thursday would be a suitable day. Sir J. PAKINGTON gave notice then that he would put the resolution on the paper for that day. Mr. BRIGHT gave notice that he should take the sense of the house on that resolution, which proposed to abolish the usual motion made on Fridays, that the house at its rising should adjourn until the Monday following. THE OATHS BILL. On the motion that this bill be read a second time, Sir F. THESIGER said that when the noble lord, now more than three months ago, introduced this measure to the attention of the house, he (Sir F. Thosiger) took the liberty of observing upon the important principle which it involved, and he promised that an oppoitunity should be afforded in this stage for a full discussion. That period had been long- delsyett, -bute-not by his fault, for the house would remember that he, over and over again, pressed the noble lord to fix a day for proceeding with it so much so as to provoke the mirth of the house, which was alway s 'so easily disposed to be amused a midst its graver occupa tion. The noble lord on one occasion, with a gravity which was remarkable, appealed to his (Sir F. Thesiger's) know le lge of his great anxiety to take a debate on this ques tion, and the noble lord appeared to rather expect him to give an assenting reply. If he might be allowed to ex press his own thoughts, they would not be in favour of that which the noble lord chose to take for granted ; for he could not get rid of an idea, which might be erroneous, that the noble lord had no disposition to facilitate the bill to its present stage, but rather manifested a reluctance to do so, which was to his (Sir F. Thesiger's) mind indi. c ativo of misgivings of the prudence of the measure. If the noble lord was influenced by the state of public feeling, he was not astonished at the mistrust which he manifested, for so far as p e titio ns to that ho i use co uld be considered as an index of the public mnd, the result was remarkable. They had no doubt that clay bad, with the usual ceremony, a petition from the city of London in favour of t the bill. That was to be anticipated. But up to that clay he returns of the peti tions presented were interesting tions in favour of the and important. The peti bill up to yesterdsy were three, with 166 signatures ; for an alteration in parliamentary oaths, but not in favour of this bill, one petition with 69 signatures ; whereas the petitions against the bill w ere 481, with 60,171 signatures. (Haar, hear.) The more ho reflected on tho course which the noble lord had adopted on the present occasion, the more he was astonished at his depar ture from all those professions he had recently made in favour of the Protestant cause and the noble lord's violation of those measures which he had so strenuously. maintained, and it was only to him a proof of the determination of the noble lord to allow nothieg to stand in the way of the accomplishment of a favourite object. Before he proceeded to consider the reasons used by the noble lord for this ex traordinary measure he must/anticipate an argument which might be urged in favour of the second reading, and against which he was anxious to warn hon. members who were opposed to the principle of the bill. One of the grounds on which the noble lord rested his case for an alteration of ortion of them was parliamentary oaths was, that a P obsolete, there being no person in existence to whom they could apply. The noble lord adverted to the oath of abjuration, and pointed out that we were called on to abjure the right and title of the descendauts of the Pretender to the crown of these realms, and that no one was now in existence to whom that oath extended who regarded with in- There might be some members difference un alteration in the oa th of abjuration, and in this particular would be induced to agree with the noble lord, and it might be insis ted on that, as they who opposed the bill yet admitted that so era alterangti i on nto com in the oaths was necessary, that was a reason goi mittee on the bill, and then that those who wore opposed to it on other grounds would have an opportunity of alter ing and modifying it in other respects. He hoped there was no hon. member opposed to this bill who would be so incautious as to be caught by that specious argument. They were at this stage of the measure confessedly dlscus sing the principle of the bill. If they consented to go into committee, they admitted that - they were prepared to legislate on the principle of there being only one oath, which necessarily involved the abandonment, or at least a softening, if he might use the expression, of the supremacy, and the relinquishment of those securities of the Protestant religion which were established at the time of the passing of the Roman Catholic R'- that Bill. And do t he pas any hon. member flatter himself that if he abandoned this high gr ound, and followed th e enemy into a field which they had chosen, that he would ever be abl er course pursue p r inciples at discretion. (Hear, than to surrender all h is hear.) The measure which had been proposed by the noble lord on this occasion manifested his determination to allow nothing to stand in the way between him and any favourite object of his wishes ; and it would be useful for them to consider what it was that led the noble lord originally to the consideration of the oaths that were taken by members of Parliament. It was in the recollection of the house that the noble lord some yea rs ago was returned as there pre sentative of the city of London wills Baron Rothschild, on a gentleman of the Jewish p e rsuasion. On that occasi the noble lord made one of those inconsiderate pledges wile ith which he was occasionally apt to embarrass himself. promised that he would use his earnest and most strenuou3 endeavours to remove the impediments which existed by law to a Jew being a member of tho Legislature. Lord J. RUSSELL —The year before. Sir F. THESIGER continued. The noble lord had cer tainly been as good as his word. Session after session had that house been called upon to discuss this question. With the exception Of the session 0f,1852, not a session had passed without the question having been agitated by the noble lord in some shape or other. In February of that year the noble lord introduced one of his finality reform bills, in which he introduced one common form of oath to be taken by all the members of the house, and which resembled in many particulars the oath now under the consideration of the house. In 1853 the noble lord returned to his original course, and introduced what was familiarly called a Jew bill. The measure was carried by decreasing majorities the in that house, and defe ated- by increasing majorities in House of Lords ; and the noble lord, not discouraged, but rather inflamed by the successful opposition, had now CoU forward with this particular measure. Th e noie -- 0 'X BANKS. 10 , all 10 1 all 77 - 79 50 all 25 5 20 2 2 lid 1 - LOO 25 Loo 20 20 12 "... ••• 4i - 20 I 20 201 -- 21 50 2O 50 10 100 20 100 35 20 lO 50 22? 20 all 25 all 45 - 47 25 5 100 25 10 an 5 1 25 all 25 I al, 41 - 43 69 - 71 7 - 8 Pip 10 lord bad shown the resolution 'which he maintained upon this subject by most extraordinary threats which he had held out. At the time he introduced this measure he in timated pretty plainly that if the law were not altered according to his wishes, it might be for the house to on sider whether it would not adopt the course which con taken upon a previous occasion, and seat Baron Roths child by means of a resolution. Now, the noble lord must wholly have forgotten, or supposed the house had no recollection of all that had passed previously upon this subject. In 1850, when the present Vice Chancellor Wood made a motion on behalf of Baron Rothschild, that the seat was full, although he had omitted the words "on the true faith of a Christian," the present Master of the Rolls, then the Attorney-General of the noble lord said he was clearly of opinion that the words were of the substance of the oath, and that no resolution of the house could enable them to dispense with an act of par liament ; and that motion was negatived by a majority of 105. In 1851, the noble lord, adverting to the argument of his Attorney-General, said it was evidently the intention of parliament that the words " on the true faith s,f a Christian". should not be omitted ; and in the year 1851, in the month of July Mr. Alderman Salomon% having taken, or attempted to take, his seat without having taken the oath with those words, the noble lord himself moved "that David Salornons, Esq., is not entitled to sit in this house during a debate until he shall take the oath of abju ration in the form prescribed by law." And the Attorney- General upon that occasion said no one who looked at the history of the period could doubt that the legislature in tended that those words should be a substantial part of the oath. What had induced the noble lord to depart from the opinions and declarations he on previous occasions expressed on this subject? Had anything occurred to shake the noble lord's views on the subject? Why, since that period, there had been two solemn decisions of the courts of justice; one of the Court of Exchequer, in which three barons to ono were of opinion that these or an wdo s were an essential and substantial p art of the oath, d n part of the ceremony of administering the oath ; and that judgment was confirmed by the unanimous decision of the Court of Exchequer Chamber, delivered by Lord Camp bell. And yet the noble lord was determined to show that nothing should interfere with the object he had at heart. Now let him contrast the noble lord of 1851 with the noble lord of 1854. The house would re• member that in the case of Mr. Pease, a committee was appointed in the year 1833, and, upon examination of the acts of Parliament, it was found that they were sufficiently wide to embrace every case in which an oath was required, allowing a quaker to take an affirmation, and upon that ' there was a report of the committee to the house, and a resolution by which Mr. Pease was seated. Now, in 1851, the noble lord said, " I have been unable to come to the conclusion, which I would willingly do, that we can act here as the house did in the case of Mr. Pease, and say that these words, `on the true faith of a Christian,' may be omitted." But what did he say in 1854? He said— " It may be hereafter a question for the house, whether it would not prefer the course taken in the case of Mr. Pease, with regard to gentlemen of the Jewish persuasion." They might gather some instruction from this ominous hint of the noble lord, and discover what was the real principle of this bill. It was evident that the noble lord did not consider any , bill was necessary for the purpose of allowing a Jew to take his seat in that house. Well, then, where were they to look for the principle of the bill ? Was it not evident that the bill was calculated" and intended solely for the benefit of the Roman Catholics, and of those members of the Church of England who were restless upon the question of supremacy, and he could not help seeing in this measure the desire of the noble lord to retrace his steps and to atone for the constitutional conduct which he manifested in 1850 and 1851. Was there nothing in the altered situation of the noble lord which might account for this remarkable change ? They must never forget that the noble lord now sat in a Cabinet, the most distinguished members of which were among the most determined opponents of the measures which were introduced by the noble lord, for the purpose of preventing papal aggres sion. In the extraordinary mixture of principles and of parties, arising no doubt from great self denial and aban dement on all sides which had gone to constitute the Government, they found those,who might still have the lingering spirit of conservatism sitting side by side with the bold and boastful assertor of radical principles, and the self-armed champion of Protestantism united with the advocates of the full and complete development of the Roman Catholic Church. In such a combination of cir cumstances compromise was inevitable. There must be some giving way in order that these heterogeneous ele ments might continue even for a short time in combina tion. Like the Roman triumvirate, which was called by Ferguson, the historian of the Roman Republic, the famous coalition, there must be, for the purpose of extin ;lashing opposition and strengthening of party, the sacri fice by each of some of their dearest friends to the antipathy or resentment of the rest. The noble lord's contribution to this proscription was the supremacy of the Crown and the security of the Protestant establishment. He would call the attention of the house to what was proposed by the noble lord on the subject of altering the oath in re spect of supremacy. The house was aware that Protestant members were required to take an oath which had been framed on the model of that which was originally intro duced in the first act of supremacy in the time of Eliza beth, " that no foreign prince or potentate, hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual within this realm." Under the Roman Catholic Relief Bill an oath was framed for the ease of the consciences of Roman Catholics, by which they were merely required to declare that they did not believe that the Pope of Rome, or any other foreign prince, state, or potentate has or ought to have any temporal, or civil jurisdiction, authority, or pro-eminence, directly or indirectly, in this realm. He was not aware that the nines of his Protestant fellow subjects had over denied the eccle siastical and spiritual supremacy of the Crown, and there fore he was not aware that any particular relief on this subject was required by them, but he found that the noble lord in providing an oath to be taken by all the members of the house necessarily proposed to get rid of the words "ecclesiastical" and "spiritual," and merely to require an oath that they did not believe that the Pope of Rome and so on, had, or ought to have any temporal or civil juris diction or power. Now, if the question were between ab solute silence on the subject of the supremacy, and this maimed and mutilated recognition of it he should infinitely prefer the former, end he was fortified in that opinion by the authority of Sir Robert Peel, who in 1819, said if they were to insert the words "temporal" and "civil," that would give rise to the presumption that they recognised the existence on the part of the Popo of a spiritual and ecclesiastical jurisdiction. It was most lamentable that the noble lord had deserted the ground which ho so ably defended in 1850 and 1851, for what was it that was most remarkable in the memorable letter of the noble lord to the Bishop of Durham, was it not the vigour and the manliness with which he maintained the supremacy of the Crown against the Roman Ciit, holies mn - tragairtst thole members of our Church who were disposed to question it? And the house would remember -that upon the debate which took place on the introduction of the Eccle siastical Titles Bill, the noble lord, adverting to the arrogant tone of some of the documents which emanated from Rome, and which were excused on the ground that it was the, ordinary form of those docu ments, the house would remember how it was electri fied by the declaration which the noble lord emphatically uttered, " I am accustomed to another form, ' Victoria, by the Grace of God, Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and Defender of the Faith.'" And yet the noble lord now propose, on behalf of those very parties whose aggression he then so manfully opposed, and those unworthy members of our church to whom he had alluded, to introduce a new form of oath which could only be cal culated for their benefit. When he remembered the posi tion assumed by the noble lord upon the former occasion, and contrasted it with the present he was forcibly reminded of the leaders of the military condottieri of the fourteenth century, men of great military skill and courage, but who were ready to draw their sword on any side, and who, after exhibiting their destructive valouragainst a particular state were ready to transfer themselves andtheir followereto the service of the very people to whom they had been previously opposed. But he might venture to ask, were they to follow the noble lord, were they who supported the supremacy of the crown under his headship now disposed to abandon it at his summons ? Let them consider for one moment whet this requisitionof g ivg involved, ia and then let the m p ause u p on the consequences way to the noble lord. Now, it was a mistake which was very commonly made to suppose that the supremacy of the crown was establis hed in the rei g n of Henry VIII. There was an assertion of the supremacy a t that time, but hebelieved it was a fundamental principle of the constitution of this country, and if it were necessary he could show repeated instances of the assertion of the supre macy of the crown in ecclesiastical matters against the usurped power of the Popes even in Roman catholic times. [The hon. and learned gentleman then quoted a declara tion of Lord Lyndhurst's, that the supremacy of the crown in ecclesiastical matters was part of the common law of the land.] In the reign of Elizabeth, however, when the seal was set to our happy Reformation, it was considered ad visable that there should be a strong legislative declara tion of the authority of the Crown, for the purpose of binding up the Protest ant religious establishment by law into one compact, independent body, with the sovereign at :ts head, and therefore it was that there being for the first time in the first year of the reign of Elizabeth this legal recognition of the supremacy, writers had invariably treated that statute as being one of the main links of the temporal institution of the Anglican Church, and as tho key-stone of the arch'of the Protestant reformed religion established by law. That being the charter of their liberties, and the oath of supremacy which the Protestant members now took of being framed on the model of that which was contained in that Act of Parliament, he thought they ought to look with great jealousy and suspicion on any attempt to tamper with that oath. They had, in fact, consecrated it by. introducing the principle which it contained into the oath which was taken by the sovereign at her coronation. What did the noble lord propose by this new fangled form of oath? Ho proposed that the oath of the sovereign should bathe only one that recognised the Protestant constitution in its integrity. But had the noble lord assigned no reason for this measure? Yes, he had favoured them with certain of his views at the time he in troduced it, and pointed out particular parts of the oath which he considered to be highly objectionable. In the first place, the noble - lord said it was desirable to get rid of this portion of the oath—" I do re nounce, reject, and abjure the opinions that princes excom municated by the Pope of Rome may be lawfully deposed or murdered by their subjects, or by any other person what ever." The noble lord said, " This was the doctrine of a party at the time of the Re formation and immediately fol lowing it, but he did not believe that there were any per sons who held such a tenet at the present day, and he held that it was wrong to call on persons to swear that they ab jured such a doctrine, when it was, in fact, an unwarrant able assumption that, there were any person liable to such a suspicion." And the noble lord stated that those words were introduced into the supremacy oath in consequence of pas sage in the work of a Jesui t, approving of the murder a of Henry 111. of Franca. [Lord J. Russell here made an observation across the table, which was inaudible in the gallery.] The first oath of supremacy was in 1558, which did not contain the clause in question. wa r i n oath, v was introduced in consequence of the gunposvder pint,.sthase not an oath of supremacy at all—it was in 1698 that The noble lord said it was an insult to theßomaidsu oath of supremacy was framed 33 it at present Ctlothosal: lies to require them to take an oath of this ki oath, as it was now taken 'the very same objection was takenouill cB2a9u, lo w li h ee e , ll w tls; a e s , ission of Roman Catholicthe mernber . refull y framed as one of by ca g ri s tios T t w a e k n o t n y ! fi n v t e h y e e n m had part e o l f aw a e m d n i n o s alt. complaintofon course one the ,anandalththoleirceinhemadbebreseonf un h that any L e n kind, and he did not believe m ust speak with groa t forbearance o h n .o. a . subjdeacdt Roman d this er tained any such principle ca tholic of the present day ent as that which this- oath was framed to guard against, but he was smo he might appeal to every high-minded catho lic whether this was not, formerly, at least, a tenet of the Roman Catholic Church. (Hear.) Had that opinion ever been disavowed? and if not, let that part of the oath be retained as it was when they passed the Relief Bill. (Hear.) But th e noble lord suggested that the oath of ell premacy was useless, because it was contained in the oath of allegiance ; and he cited the authority of Lord, Eldon. Now Lord Eldon certainly had held that doctrine, but since 1829 he was afraid that the argument could not pre vail. If the oath of allegiance referred to the spiritual supremacy of the crown, the Roman Catholics had been deceived ; but that such was not the case he thought - was proved by the fact, that a particular form of oath was pro vided for them, in which they were only required to re nounce the temporal supremacy of the Pope. In this de claration at the time of the Ecclesiastical Titles Bill the Roman Catholic laity expressly stated that they considered themselves bound by their religious principles, and entitled by their rights as Englishmen, to maintain the supremacy of the Holy Father in spiritual matters. It was, there fore, impossible to nrgne that the oath of allegiance sup plied:the place of the oath of supremacy. (Hear, hear.) But the noble lord's oath was not to be taken by members of the House of Commons alone, but it was to be substi tuted in every case where the oath of supremacy was now required • and he would ask the noble lord, who in his famous letter had denounced those "unworthy members" of their own church who were disposed to question the supremacy of the crown, what would be the effect of allowing those per sons t o take the proposed form? The 37th article contained an acknowledgment of the royal supremacy, but they had had experience that that article might be subscribed in a " ncn_ . ..natural sense "—(cheers) with the aid of thi s qualifying oath as an inter preter, there could be no doubt whatever that the con struction of the article by tho completely established. (Hoar, hear.) persons would be The object of the noble lord's propositi on , then, was to benefit the Roman Catholics, and the Romanising pseudo-Protestants. (Hear, hear.) He ventured now t o appeal to the Dissent ing members. If it were a question between the church and them, ho knew he should meet with no sympathy from them ; but he ventured to submit to their most serious consideration whether a movement which was evidently e rn intended to benefit the Roman Catholic me l me mbers of the English Church who were-(lis divided those eifrom them by a very thin wall of partition, was one that they w ould be disposed to encourage ? .He would ask them . to consider that the Established Church was one of the firmest barriers even to themselves against the encroach men t s o f poper y—(derisive cheers)—and he would caution them that if they broke it down for the purpose of establishing Roman Catholic ascendancy, they would find that the little finger of Rome was thicker than the loins of Eng land. (Hear, hear.) The oath was one of the securities devised at the passing of the Relief Act, and it had been "framed in terms which had been considered by the heads of the Roman Catholic body. In the pastoral which they issued at the passing of the Relief Act., they stated that a legislature which had so raised them from their prostrate condition was entitled to their reverence and love. (Hear.) Since then it was no doubt true that attempts had been made to disturb the settlement which had then been come i to, but the noble lord had always stood manfully in the breach to resist them. In 1847 the noble lord stated that he did not think it would be wise to alter a settlement which had been arrived at after so many conflicts and so much consideration. (Cheers.) He also declared that no necessity had been shown for such an alteration. Had any more necessity been shown since? (Cheers.) It was only the circumstances in which the noble lord had placed himself that had reduced him to this unfortunate position. (Hear, hear.) The noble lord had expressed himself in similar terms on several sub sequent occasions ; but he now objected to that part of the oath which bound Roman Catholics to preserve the existing settlement of property, on the ground that that was secured by law. (Hear.) But no one knew better than the noble lord the imprescriptible character of the claims of the Romish See ; for in 1851 he quoted with approbation the saying of Du Carron, that though Rothe might relax many of her claims, ' she never lost sight of . them ; for she knew neither infancy nor widowhood ; she learned many things but forgot nothing. The noble lord, however, seemed to have reversed that antithesis. Ho seemed to have forgotten some things and to have learned nothing. (Laughter.) Either this part of the oath was not objected to—and in that case it was idle to alter it —or if it was objected to, it must be because the Roman Ca tholic members felt themselves in some degree hampered by it ; and in that casehe besought the house not to give up this small remaining fragment of security. (Hear.) He thought he had now established his case, namely, that the now oath was calculated only for the benefit of the Roman Catholics and of the Romanisers. The noble lord wished to toss over the supremacyle the Roman Catho lics, by requiring from them only a mutilated recognition of it. When he had prostrated all the securities which had been so carefully devised at the time of the Relief Act, and which had been accepted by the heads of that Church as such ; when he had, levelled these barriers, he would then, by the aid of those who fought under the banners of civil and religious liberty, get rid of the Christian form of the oath, and so procure the admission of the Jews into the Legislature--tthe ultimate and carefully guarded object of the noble lord. (Cheers.) The noble lord had contrived most ingeniously to carry out the idea of Caligula, for he had given to the most dearly cherished principles of the constitution ono neck, in order that he might destroy them all at a single blow. (Hear.) What had happened since the nobl lord stood forward as the champion of the Protes tant cause, to make him adopt such a widely different course? Had the conduct of the Roman Catholics been such as to call for further concessions ? Had those "un worthy members" of the English Church, whom the noble lord charged with having • clone so much to weaken the doctrines and principles of the Reformation, al tered their views ? Why, then, did he come for ward to aid those parties against whom ho had been so constitutionally opposed upon every former occasion? (Cheers.) However formidable the noble lord might be in the ranks of their opponents, ho trusted that they (the Conservative members) would not be dismayed. For his own part, he committed himself fearlessly to the conflict. He had ventured to take the lead on this occa sion, but he'knew that there were those behind him with stout courage and good hearts, who, if he should fail, would be ready manfully to wage battle with the noble lord upon this important question. He could not believe that their Protestant fellow members would be wanting to them on such an occasion ; and he was satisfied that they would be able to show a sufficient force to defend thetul weeks of their Protestant Constitution from the assault of the noble lord upon the supremacy of the sovereign, the established religion of the country, and their COII3IOII Christianity. (Loud cheers.) The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER could not help thinking that his hon. and learned friend had intro. (laced into tho discussion a great deal of matter connected with religious controversy that might advantageously baie been spared—(hear, hear)—and which tended much more, he should say from experience, to darken and taint the at mosphere of the house, and to blind and bewilder the judgment of its members, than to assist in the elucidation of any difficiilty connected with the law or constitution. (Cheers) The subject had been treated by his hon. and learned friend with reference to three classes—first, the Jews ; secondly, those whom he designated the Romanising Protestants ; and thirdly, a class whom he appeared to . hold in worse odour even than them, the Roman Catholics. As, however, the hon. and 'ear ned gentleman bore very lightly on the Jews, he would follow his example, and say very little about them. His hon. friend had, in fact, re ferred to them merely for the purpose of assailing the con sistency and the singlemindedness and integrity of puipose of his noble friend the member for the city of London. Now, it would be very easy for him, whatever his opinions might be on questions relating to what were termed the principles of religious liberty, to say that the reputation of his noble friend for his consientious attachment to those principles would be handed down to posterity through many genera tions, and could want no vindication either from his own lips or from those of his colleagues. (Cheers.) He (Mr. Gladstone) stated that as an im partial witness, because it had often been his lot on various occasions and in various . senses, to differ from his noble friend upon questions of this kind ; but the testimony he had rendered was a testimony BO eminently due to him, and so just, that he was sure that even his hon. and learned friend, except in .the heat of debate, would never himself have questioned it. (Cheers.) Nothing would bower° easy than to refute the charge which the hon. and learned gentleman had brought against the noble lord, namely, that he had changed his views upon the subject since his political connexion with the city of London. If he (Mr.. Gladstone) was not mistaken, he had himself hoard his noble friend in 1810, and again in 1845, dilate upon the question of Jewish emancipation in pre cisely the same manner as he had since done. In 1847, being then challenged upon this matter, his noble friend put upon record a declaration in that house which ought to have closed the lips of the hon. and learned gentleman opposite. • (Mr. Gladstone then read an extract from b speech of Lord John Russell, in which he stated that in DM he promised to a deputation of Jews that ho would on some future occasion introduce a measure for their com plete emancipation, whereas his connexion with the city of London did not commence until the following year. His hon. and learned friend having laid before the house a number of imaginary facts, must next proceed to give a number of reasons equally imaginary, to account for the course which the noble lord had pursued. He said that the noble lord's proceedings had been the fruit of a c ompromise entered into in consequence of divergences of principle be tween the noble lord and his colleagues upon religious ques tions. Recalling to his recollection, however, the career of his hon. and learned friend, and the various political connexions into which he had himself entered—(a laugh) —he (Mr. Gladstone) did not think that that portion of his speech was as unobjectionable and elevated in point of taste and feeling as he was bound to say the hen. gentleman's speeches almost uniformly were. But if that was the case, his speech was still less felicitous as a piece of Parliamentary tactics. While the hon. gentleman was finding fault on the score of divergence of opinion with a Government who upon this subject were perfectly united, there was within three feet of him a right hon. gentleman under whose leadership he had served in the late Govern- i meat, and who altogether differed from him his speech on this ques tion. (Laughter.) When at tho close of the hon. and learned gentleman said there were behind him divers stout and able-bodied persons who would come for ward if he himse lf failed, he (Mr. Gla dstone) could not help thinking h ow odd would be the effect if the deficiency of his hon. and learned friend should be supplied by two persons who, he should say, wore certainly the stoutest ad most able-bodied in debate of those who sat opposite, namely, the right hon. gentleman the member for Bucks i and the noble lord the member for King's Lynn. (Loud laughter.) He believed he might advert to a yet more tender connexion, for no do could be closer or more affec tionate than that which united law officers of the Crown, and yet the hon. and learned gentleman who served as Solicitor-General with his hon. and learned friend was in the same unfortunate predicament of being at daggers drawn with his hon. friend on this point. (R enewe d laughter) So here was three stout and valiantclrao deficiency ev ery one of whom, instead of making up any in the hon. and learned ge ntl eman's defence, would deal c upon it the most deadly blows. (Leughter.) The hon. and learned gentleman had charged his noble friend with having made the Roman Catholics a present of the supre macy of the Crown. Sir F. THESIGER---Not the whole of it; The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER—WeII, his hon. and learned friend said that the proposed oath only required a "mutilated acknowledgment of the supremacy ;" and although he never expected much liberality from the other side, he must frankly confess that he thought the hon. gentleman had conceded a great deal too much to his noble friend in admitting that his proposed oath contained any acknowledgment of the supremacy at all. Surely, if the supremacy meant anything, it meant an ecclesiastical supremacy. • When he first hoard his hon. and learned friend dilate upon the subject in the house, he was astonished at the inaccuracy of his impressions respecting the oath of supremacy. And unless the terms of that oath were fresh in the recollection of hon. members, or unless they had the opportunity of frequently referring to the pasteboard copies in the box on the table, they might be weak enough to believe that the oath of s t a g s mace , contained something abchit supremacy. P. who had given their attention to the subject notcould t ut t fail_ to be aware that, singular as it might be, the oof 0 supremacy contained nothing whatever on the subject of the supremacy of the Crown. (Hear, hear.) Mr. J. G. PHILLIMORE—The Sovereign is called the head of the Church. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER—You say that that in the oath of supremacy . ? Mr. PHILLIMORE—No; but in tha oath of allegi• ance. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER—That from a distinguished member of the legal profession ! (Hear, hear, and laughter.) If that was the depth of darkness of a distinguished member of the legal profession, what more than Cimmirean gloom must cover the gene rality of the members of that house ! (Hear, hear, and laughter.) He was speaking of the oath of supremacy, and the hon. and learned gentleman quoted something as from the oath of allegiance, which after all was not in it ; for that oath said nothing about the Queen being the head of the Church. And he would go further, and say that the hon. and learned gentleman would find it extremely difficult to show that the expression "head of the Church" was applicable to her Majesty by any law of this country. Mr. PHILLIMORE—It is " governor of the Church." The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said they were approeimating to the truth by slow degrees. But it would be better for him not .to discuss the matter with the hon. and learned g entleman, but to take the facts as they stood. It was a fact that the oath of supremacy did, not `declare the supremacy of the crown. (Hear.) It con tained two propositions—first, an abjuration of what was called the deposing doctrine, and then a denial of the power and jurisdiction of the Pope within these realms. Sir F. THESIGER—Of the ecclesiastical power. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said it was a declaration, large as words could make it, excluding the jurisdiction of the Pope, and any power or pre-eminence he might have within notsal But that was a denial of the power of the Pope,. P ae aasertien of the power a the crown. That was to be sought for from other sources. How was this? . -The term " oath of, supremecy" had at tached to this oath from the time when it was first ens cted in the reign of Queen Elisabeth. Then, no doubt, it very well deserved the title, because at that time it began -with these words :—" I, A. 8., do hereby testify and declare on my conscience that the Queen's Highness is the . only governor of this realm . • . • as well in all ecclesias tical things and causes as iu matters temporal." That was a perfectly intelligible phrase—that was an oath of supre macy. (Hear, hear.) But it had been altered , and when ? The hon. and learned gentleman said it was a g reat bul wark of the P ro t es ta n t constitution. But it was altered. just at the very moment when the constitution became emphatically P ro t es t an t. It was no t u ntil the revolution, i n the first year of William and Mary, that the oath of supremacy , was altered ; then the declaration of supre macy, the clause of supremacy was omitted from the oa th . The title of the o a th h a d remained ; the substance had been . completely altered ; and it was now most inaccurately de scribed as an oath of supremacy. It was an oath for the two h a e n had a t d h d o e s d e o r inbi denial — 0 f - t h t h e e abnegation urisd i c ti o o n f the of t heP depositionope. purposesd o ctr , Would the hon. and l earne d j gentleman say that he was refining on this matter, and that the two things were identical? ? (Hear, hear, f rom Si r F. Thesiger.) g far from being a refinement, it was a broad, clear, palpable proposition ; it was not only a constitu tional truth, but almost a constitutional truism. The supremacy of the Crown, acknowledged by the Church of England, as members of the Church of England, was not acknowledged by other gentlemen who -were members of that house, of whom he saw a portion near him, any more than it was acknowledged by the Roman Catholics. Those gentlemen were willing to concur with the members of the Church in an oath that abnegated and repudiated the autho rity of the Pope ; but they were no more willing than the Roman Catholics themselves to concur in an oath -which asserted the supremacy of the Crown. ("Hear, hear," from the Dissenting supporters of Government, with ironi. cal cheers from the Opposition.) He must say that this was not a subject for jeer or laughter ; such a course was utterly inconsistent with the relations that ought to prevail between members of that house, for he apprehended that those who sat there for the purpose of discharging the grave responsibilities that attached to the House of Commons, ought to sit there on terms of equality. (Cheers.) And it was not competent:to the hon. gentleman, according to his iown private opinion, to define and circumscrib e, and far less to define and circumscribe by contemptuous signs, the liberties of other people. (Hear.) He had thought it per fectly notorious, and not requiring subtlety or argument of any kind, that the gentlemen of this country who belonged to the various bodies of Protestant Dissenters did very ge nerally refuse to admit the supremacy of the Crown. Was that true or false ? (Hear, hear.) He contended that it was not only true, but notorious and palpable. Then what became of the jeers of gentlemen opposite, who said that to deny authority to the _Pope within this realm was the same thing as to assert the supremacy of the Crown. He must protest against that doctrine. (Hear, hear.) There was another body who were entitled to hold still stronger language, and to protest - still more indignantly against this attempt to curtail their liberty. The members of the Presbyterian Church Establishment of Scotland were not bound to admit the supremacy of the Crown in the Church of England meaning ; and they, at all events, ought not to be taunted on that account, for they sat in that house under rights as well defined and.recognised as those of any other members. They came there, not by'tolera tion, but; fully recognised as presbyterians, and as such they took the oath of supremacy. (Hear, hear.) If the hon. and learned gentleman assented to that proposition, would he still say that an oath which denied the jurisdic tion of the Pope was the same thing with an oath which asserted the supremacy of the crown ? (Hear, hear.) The doctrine of the crown' s supremacy was no doubt held by the Church of England ; it was firmly embodied in its au thorised religious documents ,- and to those documents they must go if they wished to find it, or knoW what it was. Tho hon. and learned gentleman, with all his acute ness, would wear out his oyes in the search before he could find it in the oath of supremacy. (Hear, hear, and laughter.) ' If that were so, his charge that the Government was making a present of the doctrine of supremacy to the Romanising Protestants, as he called them, fell to the \ ground ; for this plain reason, that that doctrine existed elsewhere, but not in the oath of supremacy. (Hear, hear.) The hon. awl learned gentleman had used au expression calculated to raise some prejudice, by saying that the alto ration of the oath of supremacy would not be applicable to that house alone, but to all other occasions on which the oath was enjoined to be taken. Whether his legal construction were sound or not was perfectly immaterial ; for the only two classes out of Parliament whom it was thought good policy to tie up and bind by a distinct decla ration of the doctrine of supremacy were the clergy and the members of the universities, and the obligations of those two classes would remain in substance exactly as they were independently of this bill. The doctrine really was con tained in the 37th article of the Church of England ; there, both the positive and the negative part of the doctrine were to be found. The positive part explained very clearly the various relations of the crown to the Established Church; and the latter part of the article dealt with the case of the Bishop of Rome, in terms which worn admirable for their simplicity and clearness—" The Bishop of Rome bath no jurisdiction in the realm of England." (Hear.) It was said the articles were interprered in a non-natural sense. Ho had never heard of any person attempting to show that there was the slightest difficulty about the con struction of the 37th article. Could they say as much for the oath of supremacy ? The hon. and learned gentleman, though he spoke of it very highly, and - said that it had re ceived a judicial construction, had not attempted to state what that construction was. He (Mr. Gladstone) . did not believe-that it had received a judicial construction ; at all events, its explanation was a matter of the very greatest difficulty. There had been various attempts to reconcile the declaration that the Popo had no jurisdiction in this realm, 'with the recognition by the law of acts performed by the Roman Catholic Church, as the solemnisation of mar riages and the bestowal of holy orders. They might be re conciled e but the hon. and learned gentleman was not jus tified in speaking of this oath as one framed in terms so happy, simple, and direct, that they were calculated to baffie the wiles of those who sought to evade it. On the contrary, the words in the article were such as would bind men's opinions; for when a multitude of words were used, they could not be safely relied on as securities of the con stitution. He hoped the house would bear in mind that the oath of supremacy contained not one word about the doctrine of supremacy, which the Government was accused of making a present of to Romanising Protestants, and as serted nothing whatever as to the power of the crown in ecclesiastical matters. Not only so, but if the hon. and learned gentleman's construction were the true one, its effect would be (what he, perhaps, might like very well) to create a new law a& exclusion against a large class of mem bers sitting in that house, to narrow the pale of the consti tution, and to take civil rights and privileges from those who now enjoyed them. (Hear.) To the change proposed with respect to the Roman Catholics the hon. and learned gentleman had urged various objections. He complained that Catholics were no longer to be called on to abjure the opinion that princes might be deposed and murdered by the Pope, and said that in the Reform Act of 1833, the noble lord (Russell) had continued to maintain that declaration. That, as a mere arguntentent ad hontirtent, was not of much value ; but it was inaccurate as to the principle concerned. What Lord J. Russell said was, that it was an insult to ask a Roman Catholic to say that he did not hold the opinion that pr i nces might be deposed and murdered by the see of Ro me ; for the very phrase bespoke the illegality of the action. No Man could assert the contrary—that princes might be murdered by the Pope of Rome, or any one else. It was said the doc trine was once held in the Church of Rome. No doubt the deposing doctrine was held by large and powerful parties in that Church ; and was contested by other large and powerful parties ; but the hon. and learned gentleman had entirely missed the point in charging the noble lord with inconsistency. For his own part he did not attach the slightest value to the use of these words, either as to the renunciation of the opinion that princes might be mur dered, or even that they might be deposed by authority of the see of Rome. And the hon. and learned gentleman had himself ingeniously admitted that he did not think there was much efficacy in these securities. He said, " Let us stand by them to the last, however feeble they may be." (Hear, hear.) - - • 'Sir F. THESIGER—It was not in reference to Roman Catholics that I used that expression. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said it would be much to be regretted if the house attached weight and value to declarations of this kind, which they really did not carry in themselves. (Hear, hear.) These decla rations of the renunciation of particular opinions gave n o . security; the strength of the Church lay in the attachment of the country. (Hear, hear.) That attachment was best t promoted by what united class with class, and ho man. (Cheers.) So far as that house was concerned, its was well convinced by experience that its h f a o r r m w on which it unity, its usefulness, for the great purposes man wi h topics of ance, as far as might be, of these i h P existed, were best promoted by the exculsaiopnyand avoid reduce their law into a state of co rrespondence religious difference. (Cheers.) And the more they could with could put out from tin law opinion, the more they c a a c causeyin law that which, without being of i c li itself, beenae a source of strife c.T h o o f y their fellow o n v g e s ig t h tte a m n , d a e n ffi d should Christians and and tallow men, e itted to them on behalf of great soreness to the tenderacon o rE f lu n u g n l a d n (. f l a . ul ( t C w h i e t e b r s i l t e T s u h r e . charge the duties that welree s e e t i t c e n r hon. and learned of the crown anddotobtietiop declaration , in the following terms -- render of another to the utmost . that I will uphold, of my power, "I do swear gentleman also o sight he would not say pitiable, but the settlement of property within this realm establiehed by the laws." It was a , one to stir regret, to see a gentleman of masculine and powerful intellect, and of such great and deserved end his hon. and learned friend, attaching value to nonce as such words as these put into the oath of the Roman Ca tholics. (Hear, hear.) What was the construction of these words? He could hardly conceive any construction which the freak and fancy of an individual might not at tach to words like those. Professing to be bound by them, ho might say he could not concur in any act, however s imple, which tended in the slightest degree to affect the existing settlement of property. (Hear, hear.) . These words were introduced to m ee t th e apprehensions that existed in this country before 1829, 'with reference to opinions supposed still to linger among the people of Ire land regarding the arrangements of property under Charles 't. Paid.' Renwelre. all 3cdford and Blotchley.... 100 Buckghamsh. all Clydesdale Jc. 100 E. Lincoln gr. 6 per cent., all Glas. Barr. & Neils. Direct all Do. New...... all GlstrA Dn. Ft all ,Irtlpl. Dk. & Railway..... all liull & Selby all Do. Shares. all Do. Shares. all Lon:&Greenw all Do. Preference 100 Lowestoft gr. 4 per cent. tilt) Do. 6 per ct. / all Minch. Blau and Matlock all Nliddlesbro' & Redcar all Aidld.Bre.dfd all Northern and Easternsp.c. Do. 6 per ct. all Do. Fiscds p all ?rest. & Wyrt 12 Do. Slares. ~00 goys - tn.& Hit. 100 Do.Shopth.St 18 ilief.Roth.a• - ( Gooleg. 5 p.c 9J Staffordsh. all WearValloygi 6 per cent... all Do oe 1 'Arilts&Somrs, ,Norfolk, L.&N.W.I &ld. itekton & Darlingt. Ai(liana.. g. Count.' Do Do. L. &N.W &Ln&Yk Do !'mot Northt Do Ut y n o c r a k s s h h & l . . 4tockt. & Darlingt. ltWestn WO kberdeen . W) Do. No. 2, p. c. 30 Blyth and Tyne 10 per c. pref. (issd. at 501) WO Bris. & Ex. 4p. c. St. 5 Do. 4 p. c. Shares 10() Caledonian £lO all Chester & Holyhead Guar. 5i per cent I 6i Cork dißandonsip.c. all Dundee Perth &Aber. deen Junction all EastAngliaa (X. 3 10s) 6 per cent all Do. (.C5) 7 per cent. 2 Do. (X 7 17s) 7p. c. all Eastern Counties Ex tension, 5 p. c. No. l all Do. No. 2. all Do. New_6 p. c. St. ;11 Eastern UniOn, Scrip Guar. 6 per cent all Do. 51., 10 per cent all Do. 101. Debentr.Sh -100 East Lancash. 6p. cts. all East and West York shire Junc. all EdiulaPrth.&Dundee 5} per cent. 100 Glasgow & S.Westeru Guar. 5 per cent—, 100 Great Northn. sp. c. 100 Do. sp. c. Redeem., 5 10 St. 5 at 10 p. c. prem. . 10 Do. 4Yp. c. Scrip 6 Gt.N. of Scot. Ist Frei all Gt. Southn.&Westm (Ireland) Eighths).. 5 Do. 4 per c. Pref. Sh 6 Gt. Westn. (Berks & Haut.* Ex. 5-,p. c)... 100 Do. cov. red. V, p.c. 100 Do. con, red. Cp. c. 100 Do. irred.. 4p. c 6 Lau. &York. F. £2O 100 10. 6p. c. Stock 13 Leeds N. 6p. c. No.l Do. Quarters, 1848 100 Loudon and Brighton Guaranteed 5 p. c juo Do. Prof., sp. c. St. all Do. Convertible, sp. c., 1852 100 Do. Now Guar.6 p. c 100 Lon. &N. W., Coy. & Nuneaton 5 London &S. Western Con. Thirds all Londonderry& Color A Shares 5 a ll Londy.& Ennis. A Sh. all Sian., Shef., & in., I Shares, No. 1. all Do. New, £lO 4i Do. £6 all Jarypt .& Ca.rl.4 p.c all Jo. 44 per cent 104 Do too" Aid. Consol.6 p.e.St WO Do. Consol. Bristol & 12irm. 6 per cent 1 5 Do. Pref. 44per cent 6 Norfolk ,Debenture 100 Do. Pref. 4 p. c. Stock 100 Do. 5 P.C. Est 100 Do. 54 per ct.pref 100 Do. Way. Val. "5 p. c 100 North British all North Staffordshire 100 Oxford, Worcester, & Wolverh.£ls, 6 p.c. 15 8i 8 10 15 Do all Scot. Cent. , New Pref all Shrews. &Birm.N.G. all ihrewsby. & Chester (Nor.W.Min), 8 p.c. 10 Do. 5 per cent all South Devon De. fixed, 44 per cent all S. Eastern (Reading Aun.) of £1 Os. 6d. 100 Do. 4Aper cent. all 3.Yorksh.4P.e.Guar all Stockton and Dar lington, 4 per cent 5 Do. do. do. all Stockton and Hartle pool, guar. 5 p. c. till Ist July, 1856 3" Waterfel.&Kilk. 6 p.c. 100 York, Newcastle ,and Berwick,4 p.c. Pref. 5 Do 10 York&N.MidlandH, .nit S. Pureh..... ... .--" • ... '"'' • 2 _ 2dl 29 - 3 0 90 -- 92 PREFERENCE SHARES. 93 - 95 3 1 _- 112 - P 23 - 24 3 - 112 -- 114 105 - 107 91 - 10 o• • ~ •••• •• • .• ''''"" •• • 2113. -- 16] -- 10 -- 13 - --- 231 - 100 - 20 1 d' - 92 - - MINES Aqua, Fria Anglo Austrfn. Gold Anglo Californian Australasian Australian - Australian Cordillera Australian Freehold Ave Maria Baden (Gd. Duchy of) Blaenarvon Ir. & Coal "dritish Austria. Gold British Iron Brazilianlmp.(issued at £5 pat Do. Cocaos & Cuiada Do. St. John Del Rey Carson's Creek Clarendon Con. Min. Co. of Jamaica-- Cobre Copper colonial Gold Co piapo topper Min. of Eug. Do. Pref. 74 p. cent. English and Austria. Copper Smeltg. Co General Great Nugget Vein Do. Registered Great Polgooth Liberty Linares Lond.&Californ.Gold Quartz Crush. Co. Aariquita fcxicap&S.Amorien, ;Kew Granada New Linares Mining and Smelting Co Nouveau Monde Pohtgibaud Silver Lead Min. & Smelt Port Philip ',2uartz Rock tthymney Iron Do. New iautiago do Cuba 4 9uth Australian fin Croft United Mexican Waller West Granada West Mariposa Worthing Mining o, Australia.., Yuba, JOINT-STO Xustralasia British Colonial Bank and Loan Company British N. American Chartd. Bank of Asia Buk. of India, Australia, & China colonial commercial of Lond English Scottish and Australian Loud. Chart. Bk. of Australia fiondou and County London Joint Stock L an d. & Westminstm National Provincial of Eng1and........... Do. New ............... National of Ireland.. New South Wales.... Oriental _Bank of Corporation .... ..... Do. New ............... Provincial of Ircla.nd Do. New ............... Royal Australu. Bkg. & Cold Imp C 0.... south Australia ..... Union of Australia.. Do. New .............. Union of Loudon.... THE STONOR CobturrrEs.--The committee in this case also met again yesterday, and agreed on their report as to the principal head of the inquiry. They are to meet again on TueNday to deliberate on pope roatters of de• tail. i 151 71 8 .. xd 94- - 88 Id L 23 96 S 9 93 par 132 96 5 11 d 2i I 6 - 4i 2 29 it 4i 24 31 id 12 60 4p ...~__~. _ __ .g ___. -;S. \ t~~ ;~ ~` was t he o woo vise out opal 10 4. -1 111 : allt. n os far aka Th° 24 62 3 34 67 6