The Sun. — London, England, 1833-08-05 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF TILE PUBLIC JOURNALS. The Duke of Wellington and the Earl of Aberdeen owe some redress to the Portuguese nation, and to the inhabi tants of Li.hon more esp ,, cially, for the gross and frequent wisrepresentations into which his Grace and the Noble Lad were led with regard to the political sentiments of that insulted people. In ureing upon the present Govern- ment of England the justice and expediency of acknow ledging the authority of Miguel, and in avowing that such ri cognition would have speedily taken place, had he (the Duke of Wellington) rtmaine'd in office, his Grace t!ever failed to put forward as his fivouri•e argument that the Queen had no friends in Portugal but the band ol " fereign adventurers," who were described as consti toting the whole strength of Donna Mari s ; whereas, in truth, three font the of her Majesty's forces were 0.; other than native Portuguese. If, then, as is shrewdly remarked by t contemporary, the predilection of the people of Portugal for Miguel was a sufficient ground wl . neon to justify an intended recognition of him by the Dr,ke of Wellington's Ministry, pending even a doubtful eemflict betreen the tyrant's armies and those of the Cjuen, tl e reasoning surely holds with far more truth in favour of the Qty en's cause, now that the inhabitants ed the e pital, and of the southern provinces, have declared themselves so unequivocally for Donna Maria, and that the fortune of war, moreover, has left her M.jesty without an effective rival to the crown. If the Duke of Welling ton would have acknowledged the King de facto, whom he coot ssed to have been originally a usurper, how much more anxious must his Grace now be to press upon Lord Grey's Government the immediate recognition of that Princess, wl o unites in her own person tie rights of legitimacy and of actual possession. It would be therefore a dignified and consistent act for the Duke of Wellington to move, aed for Lord Aber deen to second, an address to the King, praying that he would be graciously pleased to accredit a Minister to the Court of the Queen of Portugal, and to interpose his good offices with the States of the Continent, to prevail upon them to follow the same just and amiable course. At all events, as the recognition of Donna Maria is now a matter of moral necessity, the sooner the requisite forms of concert between his Majesty and the Com t of the Tuileries ca❑ he completed, the more graceful and decisive will be that most salutary lesson to q rants all over the world. As f irDonPedro, his mission is now aeciimplished, he is • functns officio from the hour in which his daughter has been replaced upon her throne, and his retirement !rem Portugal may be imme diately looked for. Indeed, such a step on the part of the Duke of Braganza has become desirable on many consi • derations. He is not, and cannot be, King of Portugil, yet his rank, and the sway he has been used to exercis.., would remove from hint that responsibility which is an es•entiai attribute of all political functionaries, save the Sovereign alone. Don Pedro, moreover, has persons about him, and we apprehend posessing no small in fluence over him, whose presence at or near the seat of the Queen's Government, or whose direct correspondence with it, might embarrass not merely the constitutional march of Portuguese affairs, but much disturb and per- Imps embroil the relations between the Court of Lisbon and other friendly Powers. Don Pedro, therefore, we arc bound to repeat, would serve his daughter, and disem barrass her allies, mote by his absence from Portugal than by his continuance there. The existing Regency, with Pa molla for its chief, would be joyfully acknowledged by the - British and French Cabinets. We refer to an highly interesting letter from Oporto, for a spirited and graphic account of the military opera•ions of the 25th ult., and their results. It is clear that Bouruiont was severely beaten, and that the British brigade forms a fighting ele %cut with which the Miguelites have been shy of con tending. The contest is now completely over ; Miguel's first refuge will probably be within the Spanish terri tory.— Times. We call the attention of our readers to the very able protest (in another column) of Lord Holland, against the rejection of the Bill for removing die Civil Disabilities of the Jews. " That the genius of our Constitution (says his Lordship) is to admit all from whom it exacts the duties of allegiance to the full enjoyment of political rights, and especially that of an eligibility to offices and trusts of polit cal power, is an axiom abundantly sanc tioned by history and authority, and practically manifested by this striking fact, that ❑o subject of the British Crown is or has been incapacitated from holding such office or trusts, except by the operation of positive statutes, and that the common law of the land, which, in the language of the great Lord 'Mansfield (-peech in Omychund v. I3arker—Atkyns' Reports), a never fails to work itself pure by rues drawn from the fountain' of justice, would, if unrestrained by statute, secure to every free-born sub ject within the realm, the entire right of serving his Prince and country in any office or trust merely political and temporal, to which the favour of his Sovereign might legally appoint, or the confidence of his fellow• subjects duly elect him." It falls on those t; ho wish to exclude the Jews from the common privileges of English men to show that the exclusion is justified by necessity. The Jews are natural born Blitish subjects; "for," as his Lordship observes, " birth, not parentage or religions faith, entitle a mitt to the privileges appertaining there• unto." They are entitled to hold real property like other natural born British subjects. Why, then, are they ex cluded front other privileges? From nothing in their religion itself, for by universal admission there is nothing in their religion which unfits them from discharging the duties of a good citizen. And, in truth, the Jews could hold office, and enter Parliament, but for certain words in the oath of abjuration not in the substantive part of it, and nut introduced with a view of confining the benefit arising from taking it to Christians, or of excluding Jews from office or from Parliament; and for a declara ion in a recent statute for the relief of Protestant Dissenters, which had by no means for object the extension of dis abilities and penalties to the Jews. His Lordship has in this Protest argued the question in a very masterly man ner. The Constitution recognises no religious disabilities. They are always exceptions to the rule of the Constitu tion to admit all natural born subjects to offices of honour and trust, and can only be justified by clear neces sity. There are persons woo think that the country would be ruined if there were not continually a mani'es tatien in the House of Peers of obstin ite adherence to the principle of unjust exclusion. The exclusion of the Jews is a favourite with these people, because it is the last remnant of persecution. There are others again, who oppose the removal of the Jewish disabilities upon grounds utterly incomp►ehensible. Lord Seagrave, in supporting Catholic emancipation, voted for the extension of Chris tianity, which was not the case under the Bill for remov ing Jewish disabilities. Then we are to suppose that Lord Seagrave voted for the extension of Catholicism; because, if the retaining the Jewish disabilities prevents the extension of Judaism, the retaining of the Catholic disabilities must also have prevented the extension of Catholicism. But with reasoners of Lord Seagrave's cast, the mode of dealing of our Sunday contemporary (the Examiner) is the best:— " Rabelais adumbrated the wit of British legislators when he described a people who watched day and night to guard the moon from the wolves. The Duke of Wellington stands the foremost of these sentinels. He almost speaks in the language of Goldsmith's soldier discussing the dangers of a French in vasion It is not so much our liberties as our religion that would suffer by such a change ; ay, our religion, my lads. May the d-- sink me in flames (such was the solemnity of his adjuration) if the French should come over but our religion would be utterly undone.' For the French should come over,' read the Jews should come into Parliament, and we have an - epitome of the great Captain's speech. All this sort of people are as devout as Mistress Cole in the Minor. Lord Sea. grave, whose fame as Colonel Berkeley is not exactly as a pot of precious ointment to the righteous— " Was sorry to differ from the Noble Lords with whom he generally acted; but atter giving that subject his best conside ration, he was bound to vote aginst the Bill_ He knew that this was inconsistent with his general proceedings; but in sup porting the emancipation of the Jews, and in supporting other similar measures, he had always voted for the extension of Christianity. That was not the case under this Bill ; and there fore he felt himself bound to oppose the Bill.' " How hard it is to judge of men. Looking merely at the outside of this Noble Whig's life, how few would have ima gined what he was propagating—but, lo! it was Christianity. To judge of the tree by the fruit were difficult, if trees had a voice to declare their qualities and confound our inferences ; in such case the thorn would doubtless proclaim that the purpose '4 its being was the production of cotton."—MorningChronicle. The blow which has been struck at despotism in Por tugal, and which, w e t rus t, h as th oroug hly f e ll e d it th ere , Is not only important in itself, and gratifying to the friends of freedom, of humanity, and of social order, but most im portant as regards the gonsequences of which it will sooner or later be productive throughout all Europe. It is another of those triumphs in that " war of opinion " which Canning bad the sagacity to foresee, to which be partly paved the way by tue li berality of hi s f ore i gn pos hey, and which, with out any intention to exaggerate its extent, cannot fail to have a decided influence upon the domestic as well as the foreign policy of every state in Europe. Miguel was the representative of despotism and despots in Europe; he has been struck down even in his own strong hold, surrounded by all that tyranny could de sire to execute its purposes—by a generally ignorant and superstitious people—by a priesthood gt eat in numbers, and still greater in influence, which clung to him as its last hope --by a soldiery too brave for the cause in which it was embarked, and stimulated to do his bidiiing by hopes and ex pi ctationa which could riot fail to work powerfully upon its mind—and, finally, by it' nobility, not wealthy indeed, but more disposed to support an advocate of exclusive privi leg,es, than a government which proposed to restore the days of the Constitution, and along with them to intro duce reform into every department of the state. We say that with all these advantages—with unequalled support at home, and more counsel and support from abroad, than any legitimate Sovereign ever received—the perjured des pot has been made to bite the dust--has seen his troops expelled from his capital—.lle greater part of his kingdom declare in favour of the legitimate Sovereign—and him self, if we are rightly informed, a fugitive and a vaga bond, not only without a kingdom and without a Court, but without a home ! May it ever be so with those who would break the necks of the people, and substitute for the mild arid beneficial influences of a good government, the blighting effects of an imprisoning, torturing, and bloody tyranny ! B u t t o our or i g i na l proposition. Those who look upon the fall of Lisbon, and consequent fall of the usurper, who lately filled its dungeons with thou sands of political victims, as a solitary event—the triumph of ono brother over another—or a mere victory of liberalism in a small and comparatively unimportant kingdom,— greatly mistake both its character and importance. The revolution which has now taken place there, is only another link in that great chain of which the American revolt from its allegiance to this country formed the first, and which has since lengthened through numerous revolutions in every part of Europe—in France and in Spain—in Italy and in Belgium—in unhappy Poland, and in the states of Southern America—whose effects are to be sr en in the reform of the lopresentation which has taken place Lefe—and in the present troubled state of Germany, and which will, ere long, exhibit thems e l ves , no t on l y i n t h ose coun t r i es w hi c h are known to pant for freedom, but even in the wilds of Siberia itself ! We despair not, indeed, of the seed of re venge and retaliation which has been sown there in Polish exile and general tyranny, springing up at no great dis tance of time, and making its author, like another Frankenstein, tremble at the work of his own hands. lii the meantime, it is most gratifying to think that the good that has been already done, has been mainly achieved by British valour and British skill. The Portu guese force under Villa Flor deserves every credit for its gallant defeat of the Miguelite commander, but Napier was the man who paved the way to its victory, as well as afforded protection during its advance, and an English officer, who had been imprisoned by the usurping tyrant, the first that led forth the inhabitants of the capital to its subjection to the lawful Sovereign, and all those who were opposed to her sway. To find our countrymen the fore most in the fight is gratifying—to find them victorious in a noble cause is an additional wreath in the crown of honours which they have won. That Donna Maria will be immediately recognised by France and England, there c4lbe no doubt. She has indeed been recognised already by both as the de jurc Sovereign of Portugal; and we cannot but deem the saluting of her flag by Admiral Parker and the French Admiral, as a recognition of her de facto sovereignty, to be followed immediately by the re ception of her Ambassador at Court, and a special embassy to Lisbon. Morning Advertiser. An extraordinary and revolting execution is to take place at Norwich next Saturday, if the circumstances to which we shall presently advert, should not be deemed sufficient to warrant a commutation of the sentence. Our readers may remember that at the Spring Assizes in that city, a woman named Mary Wright, suspeced of having, on the 30th of November last, administered poison to her husband and her father, who both died at the same time, was tried upon the former charge, and was convicted. We do not wish to cast the slightest imputation on the verdict of the jury in making as a general remark that in charges, the most atrocious and abhorrent to the feelings of our na ture, there is no small danger of a virtuous indignation get ting the better of our judgment, whence it has been known to happen that an innocent person has become the victim of the law. Instances we need not cite. Therefore it is, however disagreeable the task in such a case, that it be comes the duty of a barrister not to refuse when sot licited to act as Counsel for the prisoner whose guilt is doubtful. In the sequel of this trial the prisoner's Counsel, as will be seen on reference to another of our columns this day, prevailed with the Learned Judge on the trial to dis regard the verdict of the " Jury of Matrons." The sentence consequently, instead of tieing executed within 48 hours, was respited till after the death of her child, should it prove that she was enceinte, and thus the unhappy woman became doomed to suffer several months the anguish of her peculiar situation. Het accouchement took place last month, and the law now demands her life. The question arises, how far her previous suf ferings will satisfy that law,—or whether, in this " Christian land," the mother of a new-born infant shall—in England, and in the light of the nineteenth century—be suspended on a gallows for the edification of the multitude? Besides the absence of all motive for such a murderous deed there was another argument urged by prisoner's counsel in the cross examination—no speech being allowed for the defence—name y, the high probabi lity that this woman was at the time the subject of a paroxysm of insanity; and to this, it will be seen, the Learned Judge, in summing up, particularly alluded. That a few weeks before she was certainly labouring under mental derangement was clearly established in evidence, and this might possibly have been proved to be the fact at the time of the crime had not her husband and her father died. We cannot help hoplug that the advisers of the Crown will see it right to adopt this view, and direct the convict to be placed in custody for life, as is usual in cases of this melancholy description. —Morning Herald. The Lisbon affair, as described in the only accounts before us, is the most extraordinary one ever heard of. The letters of the 22d, received by the previous packet, announced that a Proclamation was preparing, and, if printed in time, would go by the mail. It was not ready, and did not -tome ; but, in the evening, the Duke de Ca.. daval, as Commander-in Chief of the army, issued the paper, which is an appeal to the loyalty of the Ltsbonians, and calls them to arms. In the following night of the 23d the Duke, however, seems to have quitted the city without any previous notice to the inhabitants, proceed ing with tire garrison towards Cabecas, whilst the police corps took up a position without the town. We have here, then, an intact corps of ten thousand men, with the choice of ground, around Lisbon. Now, what are the supposed inducements which led the Duke to evacuate the capital ? The only one alleged is the defeat of Telles Jordao. If the one thousand infantry and sixty horse who left the capital in the night of the 21st and in the morning of the 22d had not joined, that officer could not hive had with him more than 3,000 men. The defeat of such a corps as this could bring no immediate danger to the capital, particu larly as the extent of the enemy's force was well known, and the Government were besides fully aware that General Molellus, with 5,000 men, was rapidly advancing from Alvito, in Villa Floc's rear. There is something, there fore, in the Duke's evacuation which we do not compre hend, and whether it was with a view to concert ulterior operations or by orders of the King time only can tell. " In the morning," that is of the 24th, we are told in the words of an " eminent person," that the town was without a garrison, when the populace opened the pri sons, liberated 5,000 (a few months ago they were 50,000 !) prisoners confined fur political offences, com mitted very few excesses, and that a few '.fives were lost. They proceeded to proclaim Donna Maria, and armed themselves as a National Guard, &c. This account is fully borne out by the testimony or Lieutenant Fitch, who, in Lisbon, appears to have been the hero of the day. He says that he was released by a mob of thirty people, and soon afterwards found himself at the head of five thousand, with whom be marched through the city, playing the Constitutional Hymn, when the English Admiral fired a salute at their flag. Then it was that Villa Flor crossed the river with one thousand men, and took iossession of the city. This letter is in another part of our columns. In a word, the liberated prisoners seemed to have been the only persons actively employed on this occasion ; and it is presumable that they also signed the Act of Acclamation, as neither the Muni cipality nor any of the principal inhabitants appear to have taken any part in the transactions. We confess that the whole is too confused and too mysterious to enable us to express any opinion on the results of Villa Flor's entry into Lisbon. We shall, therefore, anxiously wait fur further accounts.—Morning Post. • When the . Irish Church Temporalities Bill was in danger by the majority of two against one of its clauses, in the Upper House, Much merriment was excited by a Noble Lord whispering in the ears of a certain cde brated Marquis of the Oviposition party, " Really this is two bad, L--v !" Those who recollect a certain pithy correspondence will guess at the allusion. RATIONAL REVENGE.—At the last Mayo Assizes a prisoner was indicted upon a charge, to substan tiate which it became necessary to produce a donky in Court, as something turned upon its identity. The pri soner was convicted, and the very next day the unfortunate witness (the donky) was found murdered by the road-side. We regret to hear that the prevailing mania amongst noble and distinguished families, of e migrating to various parts of the Continent, appears to increase, and numerous large establishments are on the eve of being tiroken up. The number of domestics thus thrown out of employ, and the loss to tradesmen, at the west end of the town, will be severely felt. COURT OF CHANCERY, AUG. 3. OXENDON V. DUFOUR. This was an appeal from the Master of the Rolls. The question turned on the validity of certain contracts entered into by an expectant heir on the subject of his expectancies. His Lordship was clearly of opinion, that the facts of the case, independent of any other considerations, were suffi cient to support the decree of his Honour. As there might, however, exist in some quarters a disposition to carry the matter further, he might as well observe, that he found no case in which a person of mature age and experience,and with a judgment competent to the manage ment of la's own aff a i rs , was b roug h t w i t hi n t h e principle applied by the Court to dealings by expectant heirs with their expectancies. His Lordship, therefore, affirmed the decision of the Master of the Rolls, but he would say nothing about costs. LYRE V. MYNN. In this case a person had granted an annuity out of property which he expected to accrue to him in right of his wife. Subsequently, and before the property did so come to him, he became a bankrupt, and the question was, whether the annuity could be considered as a debt prove able on the estate ? The Master of the Rolls held that it was not a debt to be proved against the estate, but that it must be paid without reference to the bankruptcy.—His Lordship dflirmed this decision. CLASSINGTON V. THWAITES. I❑ this case the plaintiff prayed that the sale of certain shares of the newspaper, called the Morning Herald, might he set aside, on the ground that they were contrary to the terms of a deed of partnership entered into in 1818, and by which certain notices were to be given, and cer tain forms complied with, before any of the partners could dispose of their shares. The matter came before this Court on an appeal from a decision of the Vice-Chan cellor, and his Lordship, after a detailed examination of all the arguments and allegations, now said, he was clearly of opinion that the judgment of his Honour must be confirmed. It was sworn that Mr. Glassington had access to the books in which the notices of sale were placed, and that he might have seen them if he thought tit. It was sworn that he knew some of them, and, indeed, he ap peared as a party to one deed in which a share was trans ferred, as it was stated after notice regularly given ; and it therefore must be presumed that he did, or might have had notice of all. His Lordship therefore confirmed, with costs, the decision of his Honour, as far as the bill sought to. set aside the sales; and he could not dismiss the case without expressing a hope that the plaintiff would see the propriety of complying wi.h the kind suggestion of the Vice-Chancellor, and endeavour to come to some amica ble settlement of the counts, without going before the Master. SOWER V. MORRIS. This was an appeal from the Master of the Rolls. His Lordship should make no order on the petition, as to costs or otherwise ; but, with regard to the question of the bankruptcy, he thought that Messrs. Bower and Bram ston should be paid a dividend of 15s. 6d. in the pound out of the estate. ARUNDEL V. ARVNDKL. In this case, the Dowager Lady Arundel was entitled, under a settlement made in 1818, to a jointure of 8001. a year, out of certain estates of the late Lord Arundel. The next heir, feeling it necessary to dispose of these estates, obtained Lady Arundel's reluctant consent to ex change the security she held on them for such is sum of money to be placed in the funds as would bring an annuity of the same amount. This money was invested in the Five per Cents : but in consequence of the opera tions of Government on these securities, the interest, which at one time brought 8001., was reduced to 588/. On the matter being brought before the Vice-Chancellor, his Honour decided that Lady Arundel was entitled to receive the full amouut of her jointure. His Lordship fully agreed with his Honour ; and observed that, if her Ladyship had been bound by the mere language of certain portions of the deed, there was no doubt she must ba confined to the interest of the money, whatever it might prove to be. It appeared, however, both from passages of that deed, and from all the circumstances attending the transaction, that her Ladyship reluctantly assented to the change for the benefit of her family, that ahe derived no advantage from the change, and that it was manifestly tne intention of the parties contracting with her that she should not sustain any loss. He was of opinion, there fore, that the arrears, whatever they were, must be paid out of the corpus of the fund, and that the annuity must also be made good, from time to time, out of the prin cipal. Tne appeal was therefore dismissed; and consi dering who Lady Arundel was, and her situation with re spect to the family, his Lordship dismissed it with costs. In the case of " Phelps and Sproule," his Loansiarr reversed the decision of the Court below. In "Lucas v. Lucas," his LORDSHIP also differed from the Court below, and ordered the property to be dimtri tinted according to the scheme he suggested at the hearing. BLANCHARD V. CAWTIIORNE. This was an appeal from an order of the Vice-Chancellor, refusing to dissolve an injunction granted to protect the receiver appointed by the Court to menace the rights and royalties of the Court of Wyersdale, in Lancashire, pend ing the trial of an issue in a Court of law. His Lordship agreed with his Honour Or it the injunc tion should be continued for the protection of the receiver, who was an officer of the Court; but as he felt some difficulty respecting the preservation of the game, he wished it to be known that the receiver must not allow any person to sport over the forest who had not purchased the right, and that he was at his peril to abstain from permitting any of his own friends to enjoy the same pri vilege. ST. GEORGE V. WAKE. This was a bill filed by an Irish Gergyma.n (the Rev. Mr. St. George), to set aside a conveyance of one thousand pounds and of twelve hundred pounds, in Liverpool Stock Bonds, made by a Miss Noble to her sister, ➢lrs. Wake, on the eve of the marriage of the latter with Mr. St. George. The grounds stated in support of the petition were, that the conveyance had been obtained by fraud and deceit, and that, supposing there had been nu fraud, still that the conveyance, being made in contemplation of marriage, was a breach of the marital rights. His Lordship was clearly of opinion that the charges of fraud and surprize were not made out. The derision of the Master of the Rolls must, therefore, be affirmed, and the bill dismissed with costs. His Loansmr, at the rising of the Court, intimated his intention to sit until Friday next ; but, after that, he was determined to devote his time to the House of Lords, where many pressing appeals required his attention. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE HOME ClRCUlT.—Ciiorpos, Aug. 3. The Assizes for the county of Surrey comiaenced here yesterday : ➢lr. Baron BAYLEY preside.l at Nisi Prius and Mr. Justice PARKE in the Crown Court. The ❑ames of 44 prisoners are entered in the calendar, and sotne of the offences arc of an aggravated character. Eighty. four causes are down for trial, two of which are for special juries. Nothing of the slightest interest occurred in either Court yesterday ; but Captain Henry Nicol, aged 50, who was connected with the gang to which Captain Beau clerk, who destroyed himself in Horsemonger-laue Gaol some time ago, belonged, was convicted upon the clearest evidence of committing a felonious assault, and sentenced to be hanged. The following cases occurred to-day in the Crown Court : Joseph Knight, draper, aged 27, was indicted for feloniously forging and uttering a false cheek for 35/., with intent to defraud Thomas Mellersh and William Keen. The prisoner said nothing in his defence ; and The Jury returned a verdict of—Guilty. The Learned JUDGE sentence dhim to transportation for life; and intimated that he should recomm en d his belong ing to the second class of convicts, viz., th ose who worked on the roads in chained gangs. His Lordship also observed that it was absolutely necessary, in order to stop t h e coin mission of the crime of forgery, which had greatly increased since the capital punishment bad been removed, to visit it with a very heavy sentence. If, however, that severe se condary punishment should not produce th e d es i red effect, the Government would be obliged to retu rn to capital punithments—a necessity which every well-wisher to so ciety would wish to see avoided. NORFOLK CIRCUIT.-BURY Sr, E Aug. 2. lIMuNDs. TRIAL OF TWO CLERGYMEN FOR A CAPITAL FELONY. THE PING V. HOLDEN AND ANOTHER. This was an indictment for a capital offonce against the Rev. Charles Edward Holden and the Rev. Robert Fisk, the former the Vicar of the parish of Great Cornard, in Sala, 'he latter his curate—the former being about 70 years of age, and a feeble looking old man, apparently as to both body and mind ; the latter a young man of a very respectable and rather manly appearance. The case had been removed last assizes by certiorari into the Court of King's B enc h, which was the reason of its being tried by the civil Judge in the Nisi Prins Court. The Court was crowded to suffocation, so that it was with great dif ficulty the members of the bar could get to their places. The defendants, who were out on bail, surrendered just before the trial. The father of the younger defendant stood by him in Court, and by his age and stiiicted ap pearance excited great sympstby, Sir JAMES SCARLETT came specially to defend. Thomas Prigg was parish clerk in Great Cornard, in the county of Suffolk, and was in the service of the Rev. Mr. Holden, as a gardener and out-door servant, but al. w ys sleeping in the house for nearly twenty-eight years ; his master was about seventy years of ape, and a widower, his wife having died about three years ago; the other defendant (Mr. Fisk) was unmarried, and did duty for Mr. Holden, as his curate—not living in the house, but having lodgings in the parish, and coming to the vi• eange occasionally. The witness then proceeded to state what constituted the offence charged in the indictment. Of the particulars of the alleged transaction a great deal was, of course, unfit to meet the public eye, which we shall therefore omit. He said that on the Sunday even ing of the 29th of July, be was coming to the parso nage, to sleep there, about ten at night, and as he en tered the garden gate, in front of the house, he saw a light in the front window of the parlour on the ground filor. He could see very plainly that there were two candles o❑ a table in the middle of the room, and a large old fashioned easy chair at the end of another table, which stood under the window at the end next the tire-place, its back being towards the wall of the room next the garden in front of the house. The arms of the chair he could plainly see, but not its back. Mr. Holden and Mr. Fisk were in the room ; the latter was sitting on a smaller chair near the great one, and the former was standing in a leaning position. (Witness, here related some particulars not fit to be detailed.) He then saw Mr. Holden leave the place where he was, and fasten the front door of the room next the garden. Wit ness on seeing him come towards the door retreated from the window, because he thought he was coming out at the door, and would discover him there. He returned after a few minutes to the spot which lie had left. On looking agai❑ through the window he saw both the defendants in the room in a different position. (The witness here de- posed to circumstances, from which be meant the Jury to infer that a capital offence had been committed.) Witness then went into the house through the back door, and after a little time had elapsed went into the parlour, where he found Mr.-- Holden alone, whom he ad dressed in the following words ;—" I have seen your contemptible conduct—you ought to be nailed to the floor by the ears." His answer was, " Hush, hush, Tom, shut the door—it's a lie." Witness did not mention any thing of this matter to Mr. Fisk until the 12th day of August, and endeavoured to account for it by saying that he had no opportunity, never having seen hint from the 29th of July until that day, except at church, and once, when standing at the door of his lodg ings, as witness drove by. On the 12th of August he saw both defendan•s together in the parsonage, and told them he had seen what be described, and would not sit under them any more. They made no answer. On the 14th of August he saw Mr. Dimes, the attorney for the defendants. Oil the same day, but earlier in the after noon, Mr. Holden called wi:ness into the room, told him he wanted to send him ou some business to Sudbury, and then asked him to take a glass of wine. After that a second one; then inquired if lie wanted any money, adding that he " might have five or ten sovereigns, or any money he liked," but witness told him he " did not want any money." After that conversation, and on the same even ing, as late as ten o'clock, Mr. Dimes discharged him, and he and the defendant Mr. Fisk forcibly turned him out of doors. On the 10th of September he went before the magistrates, and made the charge of felony against both detendants. On the cross-examination of the prosecutor, by Sir JAMES ScArturrr, it was elicited that Mr. Holden had referred—t ma ni d- t h s e e r i v r a n . t a s m e a s t the we time re. ,‘i n n t o e %N C , h h i ch ap li h n e ca n t!: c s t indictment Yorke. The latter had a child some time ago, for which he pays, and which he admitted to be his. He denied that he ever applied to her to swear the child to his own son, but on being pressed on this point, he reluctantly admitted that he had asked her to lay it to his son. (This excited a murmur of indignation in Court.) The reason be gave for this subornation of perjury was, that " it was laid to his son in every body's mouth, and it might as well remain so." He called on her on two occa sions, and told her to lay it to his son. The other maid servant (Chaplin) was dismissed the day after himselt, and went to live at his house. He positively swore that he was not improperly intimate with her. He admitted that his master had been very kind to him, and so bad Mrs. Holden, who was between 60 and 70 years of age when she died. He admitted that Mr. Holden's mind is not as strong as that of some men—that he is rather ner vous, but denied that he could he easily imposed upon. He was then questioned to show he bad a motive for fabricating this charge, from a desire to get rid of Mr. Fi-k, who, it was supposed, had, by his inter ference, broken down the ascendancy which he had obtained over the weak and timid mind of his master. He endeavoured to account for not leaving the service of Mr. Holden after what he had seen, because be had a large family to support. (A circumstance connected with the charge, which witness stated in his examination in -chief, was called to his mind by the Learned Counsel, who asked if he list! ever stated it previously to a magistrat e or in a court of justice. The witness fenced with the questions and sbuffi-d, nor would he make any distinct acknowledgment or denial.) Sarah Yorke examined_Remembers Sunday, the 29th of July. Was in the service of Mr. Holden. The wit ness Prigg was in his service. Remembers him coming into the house about ten o'clock that evening. He ap peared much agitated. Heard the voices of her master and Prigg, speaking together in the parlour. Heard Prigg make use of a certain word. Was not near enough to heir in what tone the conversation was. They were talking in high words. tedCisass- p ex ri a g l g n , i s Cross-examined by Sir JAMES SCARLETT—She is about 19 years of ag e . W as h ousema id t o M r . Hold en . Often heard h er master an d P r i gg ta lk l ou d b e f o r e th e night in q uest i on. Th e L earne d C ounse l t h en procee d e d to question th e w it ness as t o h er c hild, whi c h s he admit and her further evidence went to show that while Ann Chaplin and she slept in the same bed, scenes of depravity took place which will not bear dis closure. Her master knew nothing of those doings then. She added, " I have had bad advice both from Prigg and Chaplin, and followed too much of it." She was then asked as to what passed concerning the child between her self and Prigg. He asked her to lay it to his son. He gave no reason except that as his son was young it would lie overlooke I. She refused to swear it to the sun. The witness was afterwards asked as to the conduct of her master and Mr. Fisk, and said her toaster was very kind to her and every body, and she clever observed anything improper in the conduct of either of the defendants. On the evening of the 29th of July her master and Mr. Fisk dined together in the room of which Prigg spoke ; she had been in and out of the room several times during that evening, and there was no fastening on the door. On her re-examination she stated that the muslin curtain, which she used to draw over the window in the hook room, covered the whole window. Did not believe there was any vacancy a person could see through. A vast body of most satisfactory and indeed conclusive evidence was adduced in support of the defendants, after which, Several clergymen, and a great number of other respect able witnesses, spoke to the character which Mr. Fisk had always su.tained for moral .A. 4 rels g i..s ocladuat, aria de cency and propriety of demeanour. Some of them bad been his schoolfellows and fellow students at college, who de posed to the correctness as well as manliness of his habits and conversation. But the most extraordinary as well as interesting part of the trial was the voluntary appearance of the male inhabitants of a whole parish, who presented themselves en masse to bear testimony to the good charac ter and unexceptionable manners and conduct of this young clergyman, who bad performed the duties of a curate among them previously to his going to Great Cor nard. There were so many of those parishioners came forward that it would have consumed a great portion of time to hive gone through their evidence separately; so Sir James Scarlet: had them sworn together, to the num ber of half a dozen at a time, and they were di awn up in succession before the Jury, and give their evidence, as it were, in platoons. One of those witnesses, a farmer, who had all the appearance of a genuine John Bull, added, em my, Lord, if a hundred 1 s p u h c a h t ica menlly,a s t o p h r i i s g e e v i w de e n re c e, " I to swear say to this charge, not one of us in the parish would believe a word of it." On the part of the prosecution it was proposed to call' witnesses to contradict the imputations thrown on the character and credibility of Prigg ; but two of those wit wt hbeeynhtal: made e rned JUD G E . h w is he L n o a rd b s o h u i t p to t r a tn h u e p ne t e h de evi dence, wit nesses, one of whom was churchwarden of Great Cornard , preli stated that they would hesitate to believe him on his oath. The prosecutor, after this, did not venture upon calling of Not Guilty, ' any more. be gan his charge to the Jury ; but alter making some 'eh:h.:verdict It was near nine o up their minds of autha t rit o y f ag d ° i 3 e: vindnecaehri,Yni him i t s htsaeeftJl observations,at h r ye returned nurforo trouble, be m a dl e e l :d d a a both defendants, which was followed by such a hur a ti s to acclamation in Court that the admonition could not repress it. Mr. Fisk, overcome by his emotions, fainted, and was carried out of Court. Sir Tooth Gooch, the High Sheriff, sent an invitation to Mr, Flak to dinner, as n proof that he considered he had passed through this dreadful ordeal without a stai n o his reputation. The fee of Sir James Searlett was said to be six hun Bred guineas. ___ OXFORDCIRCUIT.--.SHREIVSBURY, Au°. 2. George Hayward, a mild, simple-looking lad, aged 20, was charged with the wilful murder of John Causer, by stabbing him with a knife. Mary Causersaid, I live at Beckbury. I knew the pri soner. He had been paying his addresses to one of my slaughters, which I objected to. He came to my house at about eight o'clock on the evening of the 18th of July. He remained a short time. My son was not then at home, but I sent for him to put the prisoner out of the house. My son's name was John Causer. It was nine o'clock before he came. I had told the prisoner to go, but he did not. When my son came he took the prisoner by the shoulders and turned him out, and gave him a kick behind as he put him out. I heard no words, and they both left the house. In ten minutes after my son returned, and said his life was gone. He was wounded in the right side, and seemed very ill indeed. I examined the wound, which was a very severe one; and Mr. Fletcher, the surgeon, was sent for. My son lived for two days after. WlWarn Sutton said—l am a schoolmaster at Beck bury. I was walking in the village on the 18th of July, in the evening. I saw the prisoner and the deceased. The latter was saying that the prisoner should not go down the village, and the former asserted that he would. I had got about 15 yards, when I heard an oath, and a blow immediately followed it. This was the voice of the prisoner. I walked on, and in a minute or two I heard a cry of 44 Murder;" it was the voice of the deceased. In a few seconds I heard another cry of " Murder." I thought it was nothing of any consequence, and, know ing the parties, I thought it was all a frolic. In a few minutes an alarm was given, and I went to the house of Mrs. Causer, where I saw the deceased, who was bleed ing. I could not bear the sight of it, as it made me feel very ill, and I was obliged to go out. The prisoner, when called on for his defence, declined saying anything. The Jury, after a very short consultation, found the prisoner Guilty. Lord Chief Justice TINDAL passed sentence of death on the prisoner, and ordered that he should be executed on Monday next, and his body buried in the pri•on. The prisoner did not manifest the slightest emotion, either during the trial or at the passing of the fatal sen tence. MIDLAND CIRCUIT.—WARwrcr., .Aoo. 3. The business of the Assizes commenced here yesterday before Mr. Justice PARK in the .Nisi Prius Court, and Mr. Justice TAUNTON in the Crown Court. The cause list contains 28 causes, of %Mai three are for special Juries; one is an indictment. The calendar contains the names of 51 prisoners, but the offences with which they stand charged are of a very mild character compared with former Assizes. The most aggravated, according to re port, is a case of burglary committed in Kenelworth. Two young men, named Badcock and Bancut, be tween 20 and 30 years of age, were found guilty of pass ing, at a draper's shop at Leamington, a forged Bank of England note for 101. _ _ Both were sentenced to be transported for life. The like seuteuce was passed upon Henry Coop, aged 20, convicted this day of sheepstealing. NORTHERN CIRCUIT.—NEwcas.ur-uro,v- TYNE, AUG. 1. The Assizes commenced here to-day. Mr. Biron Bot- LAND presided in the Crown Court. There are but 22 prisoners for trial, and but two cases of a serious character, namely, one of arson and one of highway robbery, accom panied with much personal violence. Of four cases of horse-stealing the bill was not found in one, and in two others the prisoners pleaded guilty, and were severally sentenced to transportation for life. One of these cases afforded another striking illustration of the injustice and itepolicy of awarding the like punishment for such offences, without regard to any mitigating citcuinstances. The prisoner was a lad of 15 years of age, and his Lordship seemed to feel so strongly the hardship of the case, that he told the boy if he would lay before him any statement that might be in his favour, either during the assizes or after wards, he would pay every attention to it, and would pre sent it in the proper quarter. John Jobling was indicted for stealing a mare, on the 25th of May last, the property of Edward Greener, of Brownhilfs. The prisoner made no defence. Verdict—Guilty. To be transported for life. The witnesses to character not having answered when they were edited, his Lordship told the prisoner he would, notwithstanding, make a representation of any mitigating circumstances which the prisoner might be able to lay before him. AUGUST 2. John Slater, aged 20, James Henry, 19, James Kelly, 21, and John Macbeth, 22, were indic - ed with having committed a violent assault on the person of William Bud dle, butcher, of Newcastle, on the 26th hlarch last, and robbing him of bank notes and sovereigns amounting to 191. odd. The prisoners made no defence, nor called any witnesses. The Learned Judge then summed up, and the Jur, after consulting about five minutes, returned a verdict of Guilty. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HO USE. On Saturday an old strange-looking fellow, named Jo seph Godfrey, was brought before the LORD MAYOR, charged with having committed what is called a " God send" robbery upon John Bolton, a poor fellow who drives a cart. The complainant said, as he was driving his cart along London Bridge, he thought he might as well see that his money was safe, and, on pulling it out of his pocket, down slipped on the pavement a sovereign and several halfpence. He got the halfpence again, but two draymen told him the prisoner had picked up the sovereign. The prisoner, how ever, denied his having a sovereign about him, although one was found upon his person, and the draymen who had seen the money lifted, had been obliged to go on to deliver their load at a distance. An officer, who searched the prisoner, found upon his person a sovereign, although he at first said he had no sovereign about him. The prisoner —Nonsense, man ; I said I hadn't ne'er a sovereign what I found about me. I had my own sovereign what I had four days in my pocket, to be sure, but I hadn't got no sovereign of his'n. The LORD MA Yoa—Wby, you said in the first instance you bad no sovereign about you. You must have stooped for it. It couldn't have jumped into your pocket. Complainant (sobbing)—No, please you, my Lord, the sovereign never jumped no where except out of my pocket. It didn't jump into his, for, please you, my Lord, it couldn't do no such a thing. He help'd it in, my Lord.— (Laughter.) The LORD MAYOR (to the officer)—Give the sovereign to the young man who has been robbed by this hoary old rascal. I wish the draymen were present. What ! are not those they coming up the steps ?—(A laugh.) Prisoner (in evident terror)—Perhaps there's some mis take, my Lord. I did see vat I thought vas a new half• penny on the ground, and, says 1, thaill do, with the three halfpence I have, for to pay for a pint of heavy. But I'll give it to the poor boy sooner nor kick up a rumpus. The LORD MAYOR—Get away, you incorrigible old scoundrel. The prisoner then ran off, amidst the laughter and hisses of the crowd. Samuel Biss, the driver of an omnibus, was charged by Deputy Brooks, of the Poultry. A new system, a great improvement upon the old plan of annoyance by th e omnibuses, has of late been adopted. The omnibuses which happen to go forward without passengers, now turn about, as used to be the case with the cabs, and pick up people in either direction, for short distances ; this is a dreadful nuisance. Two brotheWrs,°nßamSelildiPieB2; Yesterday the poli ce i n t er f ere d to prevent the defendant from following thi s p ract i ce near Mr. Brooks's house, and the Deputy ca me out an d w i tnessed this scene. aE StraceyE The LORD M AYOR fi ne d the defendant two pounds. and James Stracey, an d a man named Smith, were on Saturday brought b e f ore M r. BROUGHTON for re-exam i nat i on , charged with stealing from a }outb, the servant of --- ' Storey, Esq., of 58, Lincoln's Inn-fields, a carpet-bag, containing a quantity of wearing apparel, besides other property. Mr. BROUGHT RN committed the prisoners to Newgate for trial. -- Clayton, a cooper, in St. Luke's, was brought before Mr. BROUGHTON by the parish officers, for refusing to support his illegitimate child, then in the woikbouse. It will probably be in the recollection of our readers that about three weeks ago a woman named Ella Crabbe was fuund by the officers of the G division sitting in the middle of the night on some steps in Bunhill-row, with a child, apparently in a state of destitution. On being brought before the Magistrate, she was recognised by Van, one of the officers, who said he knew her husband to have been a respectable man, formerly carrying on business in Old. street. The prisoner endeavoured then to mite considerable compassion, by impugning the character of the r e i pief overseer, Mr. Hamblin, who, she said, had the "toy before refused to grant her relief, although she bad s o ebt from the Magistrate to that effect, and in coneeq ueP tr ett* was obliged to wander with her infant about th e in a state of starvation. con °- pej Every one present, on hearing her statements the conduct of the overseer. h rfda Mr. Hamblin, on se e ing the case reported in th e ing Herald, came the following day, and ininta l t oot Magistrate that what the woman had stated Wl' s po tte i of lies ; that, on the contrary, she bad been 811 0 ; some time in their w or kh ouse , b ut h a d su dd e nly lef t 4 . for that, on the very day th a t s h e o b ta i ne d a elol d( 11 04 relief, be had previo us ly, on l y a f ew h ours before, re f l ipfs' her. The overseer added that she was a wow/1 0° 0V mous character, and had been living in a dultery' prisoner now in custody, wh o h a d one c hild by ! fe : though he had a family o f hi s own b y hi s lawful W I ! op er , Eliza Crabbe having sw orn th e c hild t o the pr Rol, the Magistrates signed the usual order of 2e. 6d. pe r with by-gone expenses, V. 3s. eei The beadle said that the woman Crabbe was ' l° in their workhouse ; that her husband, who she 1 - 011 was at sea, had been dead some years, since which she been leading a life of infamy. ri IRISH CHURCH TEMPORALITIES B MINORITY Against the Third Reading of the Irish Church 'D tied Bill. DUKE 9. Cumberland Gloucester Beaufort Newcastle Buckingham MARQUISES. Bute Westmeath PRESENT, -- -- Eldon Gloucester Airlie Lincoln Belmore Rochester Beauchamp Exeter Rosse Orford iLitol' ls * Vane (Marquis of Hay Londonderry) Gage Charleville Rolle si(10 Limerick Onnondc ."; of °mono" EARLS. VISCOUNTS. Boston Winchilsea Arbuthnot Kenyon Westmoreland Strathallan Redesdalc i. Shaftesbury Sidmouth EllenborotlP Oartmouth Cornbermere Bayning Abingdon Bexley Beverley ARCHBISHOP. Colchester Mansfield Canterbury Tenterden Digby Wynford o cod Longford BISHOPS. Penshurst (v ., Mayo Oxford Strangford) MARQUISES. Fowis Clonfert Exeter O'Niel Ossory Thomond VISCOUNT. EARO":.10 EARLS. Exmouth (Sraham (Duke of Mentrose) BIS/fors. Poulett Salisbury Guilford St. David Onslow Bristol Brownlow Durham Clancarty Carlisle Bradford Bath and Wells Enniskillen Bangor The Duke of Gordon's proxy, held by th iL°SNCßCWM: e heahoirlu l: nillfirieler l yusin°r a cin:sesuenh r gthl q :gdi(asl u h:linC i nba7: ; ::: itil i°l3:l ; by mistake was not given. The Marquis of Abercorn , w proxies, was shut out. JEWISH CIVIL DISABILITIES BO' The list of the division in the House of Loral' 0 e 'sPi Bill, which appeared in the Morning Post of Frid a i; el' was copied into several other papers, is very ific‘! r ;,179 the Proxies fi,r and against the second reading bar ° lilt' some mistake, been mixed together, and given as tl e . rh jority aga i ns t i t . A more near l y accurate li s t o f t°,,rto jority was published in the Post of Saturday, thong'!" there 62 Proxies instead of 60 are mentioned. / 81e .,0 obtained the foll ow i ng li s t, w hi c h, we b e li e ve, . found correct, of the Camperdown Western Dillon Holland VISCOUNT. Panmure Melbourne Dinorben BARONS. Poltimore MARQUISES. Cliffbrd Suffield Westminster Willoughby d'Eresby Bexley Solway (Marquis of Stourton t Queensberry) Say and Sele ARcnsi s-c Clauncarde Glenlyon Dublin Montfort MINORITY. PRESENT. DUICES USSeX Somerset Cleveland EARLS. Fife Gosford Brougham Sclsey Auckland etsgor* Chichester DUKES. Howth Bedford Minto Portland Radnor PonsonbY Stanley Dacre Oxford Foley EARLS. Suffolk Erskine Burlington Alvanley 4 Ranfurly 1 , ISCOUNT. WenlOCK iitr Ferrers St. Vincent Howland (ra l Norwich 4 1' , 0 ; Fingall (Earl of) Cowper BARONS. Scarborough Kinnaird The Marquis of Lansdowne, who had two proxies, byli n o ff" well, paired off in favour of the Bill with the Earl of l':„ 1- , PO who also held two proxies, and who was opposed to rai i io sure. Lord Plunket paired off for the Bill, Viscount ` against it. 1 About a week since, some vile incendiarY:o the audacity to mount a ladder and put a faggot ili w ,o o ; roof of the Workhouse, at Edgfield, to which hef t se l but in de-cending he forced down some of the ti l ' re alarmed the inmates, who quickly put out the 4 foot' prevented further injury; the villain, however, up nately escaped undis, overed. —Narfolk Chronicle. Coif ABYSSINIAN COURT FOOL.—At tile i tV l of Welled Selaise there was a remarkable buff°, lh , supplied to the chiefs in attendance upon the Ras t " - 0 0 1 :, of a circus, an opera, and a theatre. Mr. SAa, er A us that he was one of the cleverest mimics be °Lir a seen, the command which he possessed over hi a :doo' almost equalling that which was displayed in V",, cr t , SUET, an actor to whom in other respects he born „0100. siderable resemblance. One of his main aetlf - ,4 4 ,' consisted in the singular art of making other peoe' int e "; t'cularly strangers who had not been apprized of In, tion,—imitate the contortions of his features ; a ti ce":, which Mr. SALT repeatedly saw him exercise with and which, on one occasion, drew himself into th. o or o kind of ridiculous situation without his being con se e l the changes in his countenance, till he was ro , ' sa , s ole d fl friendly hint from the Ras. At the desire of hi s — 0 0;( he afterwards performed some finished pieces 0' 0 0 0 which evinced very extraordinary native talent. let t these was the imitation of a chief in the fi e ld of batti6e,ro) had not been remarkable for his courage. came in very pompously ; calling out in an o ' 4 o p manner to his soldiers, and vaunting what he when the enemy approached. He then mitnicx4o_, sound of horns heard from a distance, and the lo'' i f; r o P i Of a drum. At hearing this he represented his ;po ll , beginning to be a little cautious, and to ask ques ti tro t those around him whether they thought the enema' 6 _,V, This alarm he continued to heighten in propartio.o 'JO; adverse party advanced, until at length ha defile ° , th o unfortunate leader as nearly overcome by his fear' b musket trembling in his hand, his heart panting , a O lO O eyes completely fixed, while, without being sensibl e oro o move ment, his legs began to ma k e a ver y p r udent r ro pt This part of his action excited among the apects t° ol o o , • 'are of contempt due to the original characteriecgiii dexterously laying hold of the circumstance, be a , le er A # be ashamed of his cowardice, mustered up his WP be of courage, and advanced, firing his matchlock et, t $ 0 ) 0 moment in a direction exactly contrary t o that i n e reS o i the enemy was supposed to stand, when, A l 3 do oo frightened at the noise of his own gun, he sank timeol his knees and begged for mercy. During this d a t expression of his countenance was inimitable; $ ll .l l O Ol Ol conclusion the whole of the spectators buret into a O ll9 admiration. T orrE M AZE, for this was the oaPses performer, had one day so much offended th e it eildi certain liberties th a t h e comman d e d hi m neveri;olerol set ftot on hi s carpet, w hi c h i t may b e remarked OS t ip in Abyssinia only half way down the Note. ot ee de ri morrow, however, to the great surprise of th e ‘:bou l lil the jester made hi s app e ar an c e mounted on th e - ,itis,o) of one of his attendants, in which ludicrous ebionl advanced close up to his master, and with a very /t o tlloi expression of features cried out, r' You cannot 'alto pal am on your carpet now !" WELLED SELAS" , cO O I Ibf most of his countrymen delighted in humour , 01 ) refrain from smiling, which insured the torgivediab, mirth-maker and his return to o ffi ce.---'c'ssil Cabinet Library, No. XII. Nubia and Abg C ° 74 TRAc , AN Ti ' At AL Po rg y s whiel nf 2Y CH ri.d p , (3 4 Tyr, f , I 1 A II,'°NIPF U TION R T AT: P° bA f ew j 1 Porn a.oi rigna 4ol) pt,tPublio,p thAnj IIoNjAMI c 4l t oti " of F 4fid I Alit, lor 1. 4 "on ; T"T° REAI p rOlll4trume il a the kie Prnfea do violin p Ibkiindon • Lat e ] y puro IV 10 W e know we __Nation. It j ai convi Ilteta„o C on AO rk to re • e, ou 4 4, 1 1 h60,„ 11 41 , st a q a o 4 1 i ih~ htblP37 y`ec.. l i° 4, l)eit i t • tat. +a 4 , e .op v. 1, ne Lov ed z 11 '44; t,hCnict he der i' Z h all N ic tt::44,.terieltitttet: th c e h l e a ti c 'f the ' ( i ,Pl4 l stii e i at e i 6a, iuti on t .Ar tP —t the ' l °l *N I Pl itk .2, to tAwiner.Laurtiry, ivo. Alt. ivuoza a ii.• It! i IRTHS. til e e . ,, ell e 0 On the 23d ult., in Some rs e t- -street, Portman-sq h st is P of M. Charles Edouard Colmache, Secretary to " . Prince de Talleyrand, of a daughter. o f P ar v „ 4 On the '.lcl inst., the lady of Fiederick Tyrrell, -. s ''' Or street, of a son. of the ladY On the3Oth ult., at Hampton C o u r t Palace, Baird, 15th Hussars, of a daughter. ~ a sol , . Oti the 9.d inst., the Countess of Lichfield, O . (JO MARRIED. oul' Se6 y On the 3d inst , at East Wickh am , G e orge ......................,./ salt, 0 3 ,1, 00 1 of the Rev. Stephen Tucker, of Welling, to Mary 1 , :, 3 pa t daughter of John David Rolt, E sq., o f Brooinfi ci ' ' ' fef' tO t DIED, ~ o t, Co le ' On the '29th ult., Sarah, the wife of Mr. Jae of , Bridge-street, Westminster. ' aea /S* der , el , On the Ist inst., the Hon. Henry Watson, a m a Co - ,el I On the Ist inst., at the house of her bon, J°- at," 0 • Kennington, Mrs. Cutler, late of Sherburne, Do r ' _so „ / 1 , 0 r j ,IP PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY Al U it D 0 Y 4 ":.. m. SUN Ornot,ll2, BTahrin...l,o"--