The Sun. — London, England, 1833-07-25 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS, JULY 21. COMMISSION. The Royal Assent was given by Commi , sion to the As sessed Taxes Composition Bill, the Royal Artillery Pension Bill, the Real Property Bill, the Limitation of Actions Bill, the Lunatic() Inquirendo B 11, the Woollen Trade Regulation Bill, tl.e E'ection of Corporate Officers Bill, the Public Winks Bil', the Highland Roads and Bridges Bill, and several private Bills. The Commissioners were the Lord Chancellor, the Marquis of Lansdowne, and the Earl of Shaftesbury. 3lr. LYNCH and others from the House of Commons brought up a messaze requesting that their Lordships would he plea , ed to communicate to them the report of the Select Committee on the Chancery Regulation Bill.— Ordered to be communicated forthwith. THE SABBATH DAY. Lord BELHAVEN presented a petition from the Pre3• bytery of Paisley, praying for a legislative enactment for a better observance of the Sabbath Diy.—Order , d to be laid upon the table. The Quakers' and Moravians' Affirmation Bill, the Hamburg Marriages Bill, and the Bankruptcy Court Amendment Bill, severally passed through a Committee, and were respectively ordered to be reported. IRISH CHURCH BILL. The House resolved itself into Committee on the Church Temporalities (Ireland) Bill. The NOBLE. Cll-1 IRMAN having put the 49th clause, re lating to the rotation according to which the Irish Bishops are to sit in Parliament, Lord PLUNKET moved an amen , iment to the clause, the effect of which was to insure the attendance of one of the It ish Archbishops every year in Parliament. Lord ELLENBOROUGH considered this arrange ment highly objectionable and unfair. The Eul of WICKLOW should concur in the amend ment. The Archbishop of CANTERBURY expressed his readiness to accede to the proposition of the Nohle and Learned Lord, deeming it, as he did, a better arrangement than the present. Lord BERESFORD suggested whether that was not the prop .r time for determining the expediency of nomi-, natinz certain of the Irish Bishops as the perpetual repre stative of the Irish Episcopacy in their Lordships' House. The amendment, and also the clause, were then agreed to. The 50th clause, relating to the revenues of the bishop rics of Armagh and Derry, was struck out, and a new one substituted for it. The 51st clause, exempting - the bishoprics of Derry and Armagh from the annual tax in respect of the sums paid by them, was agreed to. The :odd clause having been put, Lord ELLENBOROUGH objected to it on the ground that its preamble and that of the Bill were inconsistent. The Bishop of LONDON suggested whether it would not he htter, instead of saying " it is expedient to diminsh such excess," to say it is " expedient to apply some part of such excess to the purposes of this Act." Lord ELLENBOROUGH could nut adopt the sugges tion of the Right Rev. Prelate. The E tri of RIPON was convinced the anticipations of the Noble Baron would turn out a total failure. The Duke of WELLINGTON should move an amend ment to ti e following effect :—" And whereas the revenues of the archbishopric of Armagh and Derry having greatly Increased, it is expedient that a portion thereof should he applied to other purposes connected with the Church of Ireland." - The qoestion Lavine. ' been put, The Archbishop of CANTERBUkY said, that unless the Church Establishment in Ireland was properly kept, the result would be a loss of congregations, and a comaquent prejudiee to the religion established by law in that country. He was anxious to have the church property supported. The Earl of HADDINGTON had strong objections both to this and the 53d clau-e ; and, if not anticipated in his intention by stone other Noble Lord, he should, on the bringing up of the report, move that the clauses he had nomad he omitted altogether, and that the schedule be altered accordingly. Lord ELLENBOROUGH insisted that, from all the calculations which had been made, there was little prospect of small livings being augmented within any reasonable rime. It was not a little singular that the calculations of the Noble Lord the Chancellor of the Each , quer agreed with his. He disapproved of the amendment as he had done of the preamble itself, for if either were adopted it would ultimately lead to a reduction of the incomes of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of London, as well as those of the other Bishops. The Earl of RIPON wished to set the Noble Baron right with respect to the calculations of his Noble Freud the Chancellor of the Exchequer. His Noble Friend at first thought that the perpetuities would bring six years' purchase and yield 3,000,000/, hut having, at the sug gestion of a Noble Lord, altered his calculation, by taking two instead of six years' purchase, he reduced the amount to be produced to 1,000,060/. ; but as to the reduction to 200,0001. or 300,0001., he had never heard of it. Lord ELLENBOROUGH had read the statement to which he now referred, and believed it to be correct.— (Where, where ?) He had not access to such accurate information as the Noble Earl, but on referring to the report of a Committee of the House of Commons, he had mood that the Noble Lord (Althorp) had made a gross misstatement of what was the foundation of the statement to which he (Lord Ellenborough) had alluded. The Noble Lord had in fact mistaken gross for net value. The Marquis of BUI'E was understood to be in favour of the amendment. The Earl of WICKLOW did not think they had any right to take from the Archbishop of Armagh and Derry soy portion of lei' i ncome . The Duke of Wis LLINGTON withdrew his amendment. After a few verbal amendments the clause was agreed to. The 53 , 1 and 54th clauses were also agreed to, with same verbal amendments. Upon the 55th clause being proposed, The Duke of WELLINGTON was anxious to protect the Fellows of Trinity College, Dublin, from any undue or unfair operation of this Bill. His object was honest and sincere ; but if his object were considered to endanger the passing of the Bill, he would not press it to a divi-ion. The LORD CHANCELLOR considered the clause as absolutely necessary to the vitality of the Bill. Lord WYNFORD was opposed to the Bill, and parti cularly to the clause now under the discussion of their Lordship'. Lord PLUNKET considered the clause so necessary that if it were not agreed to the whole object of the Bill would be destr:yed. Toe Duke of CUMBERLAND had much at heart the dhjects and interests of the University of Dublin, and hence ;t was that he was comriled to vote against the clause pow under the consideration of their LordshipQ. The Earl of WICKLOW expressed a hope that the Noble Duke would withdraw his intended amendment. The Earl of BOSSE had great respect fur the Univer sity of Dublin ; he wished to see its interests proper; but he thought, in the present stsge of the Bill, it would he quite as well if the amendment of the Noble Dube was postponed. The Duke of WELLINGTON said, if it was tl:e plea. sure of their Lordships be would not press his amendment. his only object in proposing it was to give equal advan tages to the junior and senor Fellows of that Univemity, ss was enjoyed by the Fellows, lay and Cerical, of the jUnivrrsities of Oxford and Cambridge. he Archbishop of CANTERBURY was very much in t) support the amendment of the Noble Duke, and that without the slightest wish to destroy the main pro- visions of the Bill. The Duke of GLOUCESTER said, the elections o F e llows were conducted at Cambridge with the greatest Impartialiiy. The Earl of ROSSE also bore testimony to the ability and learning of the Fellows of Dublin College, and their fitness ro discharge the duties of parochial clergy. The Bishop of GLOUCESTER was anxious to see acme such measure passed as that recommended by the Noble Duke. Earl GREY looked upon the amendment as one of very great importance, and he was sure not one of their Lord ships approached the consideration of it with any other reeling than a desire for the security and improvement of the learned body whom it affected.—( Hear.) The Noble Duke had shown that there were 1,700 pupils to be di vided amongst the 18 junior Fellows; and as the fellow ships were admitted on all hands to be very valuable, there mould be, he thought, no objection to leave those college li v i n gs in the suppressed dioct se to the disposal of the two Arc hbi s hop:, and to extend the selection to the scholar, ( Hear, b e , i .)---for the purpose of givin g encouragement to that branch of the University. At the sa me ti me , h e should be very glad if the Noble Duke would have the goodness to postpone the am-ntlinent for the present, t o allow time to consider in what shape it might be intro duced in another part of the Bill, The Duke of WELLINGTON had no objection to withdraw the amendment for the present, and to . leave it to the Noble Earl to bring it forward at another time. The Duke of CUMBERLAND said that the Fellowshrps were not so valuable as the Noble Earl supposed. The Junior Fellows were only allowed a stipend of 1001. a year, besides the fees of the pupils, which were uncertain and fluctuating. Lord BERESFORD believed that it was the wish of the Senior Fellows of Dublin College that the number of junior Fellows should be increased on account of the great increase of the number of pupils since the termination of the late war. The clause was then agreed to. The 56th, 57th, sSth, 59th, and 60th clauses were also agreed to. On the reading of the 61st clause, Lord WHARNCLIFFE said that be would not object to the imposition of a tax upon the more opulent clergy for the purpose of making up for the deficiency of the in comes of their poorer brethren, but be was strongly opposed to the substhution of a tax upon the clergy for the church cess, which was now paid by the land. It appeared to him to be most unjust to require the clergy to pay for the sacramental wine and for the salaries of their clerks. He should propose that the produce of this tax should be solely applied to the augmentation of the small livings.—(Hear.) lle might, he was aware, be met in limine by the objection that the other House would not consent to his amendment; hut, notwithstanding that, he trusted that their Lordships would show to the clergy that their case would be dealt with in that House at least (the House of Lords) fairly and honestly.—(Hear.) He moved an amendment to the effect that the proceeds of the tax upon the incomes of the clergy should be appropriated solely to the augmentation of small livings. Earl GREY thought that if the tax was imposed at all there could be no objection to the application of part of the proceeds to the expenses of the Church service. The Rail of WICKLOW was decidedly opposed to applying any of those funds to the relief of the land from a burden which it had hitherto exclusively borne. The Marquis of BUTE supported the amendment. Lord ELLENBOROUGH entirely concurred in what had fallen from his Noble Friend (Lord Wharncliffe), and he thought the amendment of very great importance. Lord WHARNCLIFFE admitted th it his amendment did not quite get rid of the injustice of the clause. Lord CARBERY supported the amendment. The Earl of HADDINGTON considered the amend ment very important. The Bishop of LONDON would vote for the amend ment if his Noble Friend pressed it to a division, as it would save their Lordships from the danger of establish ing. a Precedent for the application of the revenues of the clergy to purposes which, in law or justice, they had no right to defray. The House then divided— For the original clause For the amendment Majority The Marquis of BUTE proposed an amendment which went to limit the operation of the clause to such time as or her provisions might be made by law for the cess in place of this tax on the clergy. The ani,ndment vas negatived, and the clause agreed to. Clause 62 was also agreed to. Clause 63 being put, The Earl of WICKLOW said the clause as it now stood was likely to create much confusion. There were two hi unchrs of cess in Ireland, only one of which was to be abolished by this Bill. Many, however, would sup pose that it put an end to all cess in Ireland, unless the point was rendered more clear. Lord PLUNKET thought the Bill was sufficiently clear upon thii head. He had no objection to any amend ment by which it might be rendered more clear. He would tike time to consider the matter. 1 lie Duke of WELLINGTON having proposed an amendment which went to exclude parish applotmenta other than those contemplated by the Bill from the opera tion of this chose, the clause was postponed for the preient. Clauses 61 to 70 inclusive were Olen agreed to. 'The clauses from the 71st to the 75th were severally, with verbal arrwrilimeres made in them, agreed to. On the 761 h clause having been put, Lord CARBERY moved an amendment to the effect :bat it should be lawful for the Ecclesiastical Commis- sioners to advance such sum or sums of money for the building of churches or chapels of ease in any parish or place in Ireland, provided application for the same should he made to them in writing, and that they were furnished with a plan or estimate of the expense necessary to be incurred fur the same, on the condition, however, that they should be allowed to employ their own architect, and were not to be required to pay the last instalment until they were satisfied the building had been erected in a sufficient and workmanlike manner. The Earl of DARNLEY expressed his intention to vote for the clause as it stood. The Earl of GOSFORD sail that if the erection of a new church became desirable, there surely could be no difficulty in obtaining twenty signatures to the application for the advance for the purpose ; neither did he think a church should be built unless at least one• fifth of the expense had previously been contributed by those who wished for it. _ The Marquis of CLANRICARDE did not think the amendment called for. The Dill of WICKLOW said that the amendment of Noble Friend was well deserving the support of every !rue friend of the church. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE thought it would be better to invest the Commissioners with a discretionary power as to the application of the fund at their disposal for the building of new churches than to tie them down to a particular line of conduct. At all events the House should know exactly what the object of the amendment was before their Lordships were called upon to decide upon it. Lord CARBERY explained that his object was to re move the obstacle which the clause placed in the way of building new churches, however desirable, in places where contributions to the amount of one-fifth of the whole expense could not he raised. aThe Archbishop of CANTERBURY observed that it was their Lordships' bounden duty to do all in their power for the miintenance and preservation, if not far the spread ing, of the Protestant religion in Ireland. This was the obj , ct which the amendment of the Noble Lord seemed to have in view, and, therefore, it should have his hearty concurrence.—( Hear.) The Bishop of LONDON said that the Commissioners for promoting the building of churches in this country had in many instances borne the whole expense of the bui!ding out of the funds at their disposal, and be, there fore, could see no reason why the Irish Commissioners should not act upon the same principle where they were sati•fied of the necessity. Indeed the difference of the circumstances of the two countries, the population of the one being altogether Protestant and that of the other for the must part Catholic, rendered their doing so the more necessary, and on that ground it was that he and his Right Rev. Brethren felt themselves not only fortified but ustified in voting for the amendment. Earl GREY should not have the least objection to re- duce the number of persons signing the application to thireen, or the amount of the contribution to one—eighth instead of one-fifth. It was, however, necessary that the Coaimissionors should have some general rule to go by, although he was perfectly ready to enable thorn in parti cular instances to dispense with the prescribed formalities. Ti:e LORD CHANCELLOR thought that the whole matter might with advantage be left to the discretion of the Commissioners. Lord CARBERY wished the principle adopted by the Board of First Fruits to be extended to the Commissioners. The Earl of RPON hoped the Noble Lord would not press his amendment to the full extent. The proposition of his Noble Friend was as fair as could be made. The Duke of WELLINGTON said the osject of the Board of First Fruits was to repair and enlarge chapels rather than to build new ones. Upwards of 700 chapels had been built in Ireland within the last twenty years; but, if he understood the proposition of the Noble Earl (Earl Grey) right, the ecclesiastical revenues were not to be laid out for church purposes unless the application was signed by a given number of Protestants and a certain sum contribtred.—(Now he could tell the Noble Earl that there were many places in Ireland where not only no sub scription could be raised, but it would become baz trdous to a Protestant to be a party in such a proposition as that of erecting a new church.—(H-ar.) The LORD CHANCELLOR said all his Noble Friend intended was that a general rule as to the application of the fund should be established, but without meaning to prevent the Commissioners departing from that rule whenever the circumstances warranted their doing so. The Archbishop of CANTERBURY had an amend ment which he thought would at the same time be liable to less objection, and accomplish all that was required. The Most Rev. Prelate then moved an amendment to the effect that the Commissioners should be at liberty, on being sstisfied of the necessity, to advance any reasonable sum or irins for the huildit,g of churches or chapels of ease in Ireland. Lord ELLENBOROUGH observed that this amend • meta would leave that part of ;he clause requiring twenty signatures to the application untouched. Earl GREY expressed his entire acquiescence in this amendment. s o o p m o e f further , ob E s r r i v a G t r o e n y s , f r L o o m , a Lord b E e l r l y e b t o h reo Earlugb the A l f 3 t i e s r lt of Wicklow, and Loid Plunket, Lord WHARNCLIFFE moved that a proviso to the following effect be added to the clause Provided always, If it 6 , 311 appear to the said Commissioners that, under the peculiar circumstances of any parlsli or place it is expedient that a church or chapel of ease should be built, without any application for the purpose being made, or any contribution obtained, it shall anti may be lawful for them, the said Commissioners, to advance whatever sum may be necessary for the purpose out of the moneys at their disposal, without any such application or contribu tion as aforesaid." Earl GREY had no objection whatever that this addi ion should be made to the clause. Lord CARBERY and the Archbishop Of CANTERBURY withdrew their amendment, and that of Lord WHAaN CLIFFE was then put and carried. The clause, as amended, was agreed to. Climes 77 and '7B were also agreed to, after some ver bal amendments. The House then resumed, and the CHAIRMAN reported progress, and obt a in e d leave to sit again to-morrow (this day). Adjourned at a quarter to one o'clock. MINORITY On the second reading of the Church Temporalities (Ire land) Bill. PRESENT. DUKES. Cumberland Newcastle Rosso Charleville Orford Brownlow Beauchamp Eldon Falmouth Roden r►RL4. BARONS. iSaltersford (Ear of Buckingham - 6;urtoun) De Dunstanville Rolle Bayning Bolton Redesdale Ellenborough Arden lfeldrum (Earl of MARQUISES. Abercorn Cholmondeley Aylesbury Londonderry Westmeath VISCOUNTS. Strathallan Doneraile Sidmouth Combermere Penshurst (Viscount Strangford) EARLS. Winchilsea Sandwich Shaftesbury Abingdon Aylesford Selkirk Orkney Ahoyne) . Colchester Onnoncle (Marquis of Ormonde) 'Forrester Bexley Tenterd en Wynford ➢ARONS. Willoughbydeßroke Teynham Saltoun Hay Boston Douglas of Douglas Walsingham Grantley Kenyon Oartm'outh Guilford Digby ARCHBISHOP. 1 Canterbury Beverley Mansfield Longford Limerick Mayo BISIIOI. Bangor Carlisle Rochester Gloucester 'Exeter Belinore DUKE, Dorset PROXIES. EARLS. Clancarty Powis BIRONS. Delamere Wigan (Earl of Bal earras) Feversliam MARQUIS. Thomond VISCOUNTS, Lorton jExmouth EARLS. Cardigan Poulett (.Iraham (Duke of BISHOPS, Durham salisbury Bristol Lincoln Ox lord St. Asapli Cloaca Ossory St. David BARONS. Forbes Gage Loftus (Marques of Ely) Sheffield (Earl of) Churchill Montroe) Norwich (Duke of Gordon) Enniskillen O'Niel Onslow HOUSE OF COMMONS, Juzir 24. The House resumed soon after five o'clock. The SPEAKER. lest the House, with several of the Mem bers, to hear the Royal Assent signified to various Bills. Mr. HILNIE presented a petition from the Church wardens, Overseers, and inhabitants of the parish of St. John, Wapping, for the admission of Foreign Sugar for refining for exportation. Lord HOWICK presented five petitions, praying for the total abolition of slavery. BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. Mr. O'CONNELL gave notice that he should call the attention of the House to-morrow to a breach of their privileges committed by four of the Morninz Papers, by the publication of their proceedings.—(Loud laughter. ) SUGAR REFINING. Mr. CLAY, pursuant to notice, rose to submit a reso lution to the effect of admitting foreign sugar for refining for exportation. The Hon. Member having stated that he had hoped that the West India interest, in whose favour the present mischievous monopoly was maintained, would have, of their own accord, proposed a relaxation of that monopoly, seeing that it had, without essentially benefit ting themselves, brought the sugar refining trade to the verge of ruin, proceeded to sly that he would not deal in idle declamation, but prove the terribly depressed condition of the sugar-refining trade, by the irrefragable evidence of facts. The restrictions at present imposed operated very injuriously, both on the manufacture of refined sugar and upon the export trade in that article. To show fur ther the injurious nature of the restrictions, he would read a statement of the quantities of refined sugar exported since the year 1815 : Cwt. In 1816 the quantity exported was 584,1100 1817 697,000 1818 711,000 1819 520,000 1820 1821 f rt.= 182° 374,000 408,000 1824 435,000 1825 359,000 18311 344,000 Showing a diminution since the year 1818 of more than one-halt of the quantity of refined sugar exported. If they inquired what were the circumstances attendant on this gradual diminution of the exportation, they would find that in 1815 the produce of the British plantations was 3,400,000 cwt. ; the home consumption being 2,500,000 cwt. Since that period, the produce of the British plan tations had risen to 3,900,000 cwt., and the home con sumption had risen to 3,500,000 cwt. It was also neces sary to say, that these were official returns ; so that the real amount was not stated, the drawbacks on exportation from this country, which were deducted in the calculation, being nearly double the amount of the duty paid on the importation. In the year 1827, great complaints being made by the sugar refiners of their inability to continue their manufacture for want of the raw material, Mr. Huskisson took measures, which resulted in the issue of an Order in Council, for its admission. In 1828, a Bill was passed to the same effect, which 13111 was renewed in 1829. The trade of the sugar refiners in consequence improved. Cwt. In 1827• the quantity of refined sugar exported was 409,000 18 - 28 456,000 1829 475,000 1830 607,000 The operation of the Bill terminated on the sth July, 1831, and the measure was not renewed. The consequence was, there was a small falling off in the exportation of the refined sugar in 1831 ; and in 1832 the quantity ex ported fell to 455,000 cwt. What had since occurred ? In the first quarter of 1830, the quantity exported was 145,000 cwt. ; in the second quarter 150,000. In the first quarter of the present year the quantity exported was only 76,000 cwt., in the second quarter only 59,000, making little more than 130,000 cwt. as the exportation of half a year. It was clear, therefore, that the manu facture was nearly at the point of entire annihilation, and unless some measures were adopted to relieve it, it must sink into complete ruin. He had already stated the cir cumstances which rendered the official returns net entirely to be depended upon ; but lie had from other sources rea son to believe the whole amount of sugar imported from our colonies, including the Mauritius, in the year 1832, had been 4,430,000 cwt. ; and the whole amount of home consumption about 4,000,000 cwt. There was no reason to doubt that the crop this year would fall of by at leiist 30.000 hhds. The result would he, the sugar refiners, who refined for the foreign market would be under the ne cessity of entering in competition with the refiners fur home consumption ; and eventually the whole of their capital would be sacrificed, and a general distress overtake all the branches of trade connected with them. It was quite clear that, if the refiners could not refine for the foreign market, they would be driven to compete with refiners for the home market, and that the result would be the ruin of all parties. He would state the effect which the existing system had on the refiners of London. In 1830 there were at work ..... 204 pans. 1831 1432 183 70 The state of the outports was equally distressing, In Scotland a great many of the refineries were out of work. In Liverpool not two-thirds of the refineries were at work. In Bristol scarcely a half ; in Hull not two-thirds. In fact, the whole trade might he considered as nearly at a s tand still. What must be the effect on numer ous trades connected with the manufactory in question he need . scarcely mention. He had already presented to the House petitions from the parties aggrieved. The sugar refineries ha I formerly expended a sum between 600,0001. and 700,00 01 . a year on the trades connected with them. \lore than 400,0001. of that expenditure were now with drawn, and misery pervaded every class of workmen. As an illustration of the effect of this diminished expenditure, he would state the comparative amount of the bills of a builder of high character, who was much employed by the sugar refiners. In 1828 his billv.ad £ 7OO 0 1830 1830 1831 1832 1833, up to the present period 3 17 te t h He had been told by a master carpenter trtiahiswhereas lossh he loyed 10 0 men , he now empl oye d on l y two ; faomnnouenotyedemtop 15/. a day ; by a coopr , and by a bricklayer , that having formerly employed forty men, he now did not employ one. He was aware that the subject was a dull one; but the House must feel that it was of the highest importance.—(hear, hear.) There was not only the misery of the pre,ent moment to b e the misery of considered, but, unless relief were AGided, the future. Indeed the trade was already leaving our I shores. He knew a highly respectable man, a constructor of machinery, and who was ready, if necessary, to give his evidence at the bar. He had been commissioned to fit up two refineries for Amsterdam, and others for the Banks of the Rhine; and it was his unequivocal opinion that the carrying on of the manufacture of refined sugar in the places in question depended entirely on the success of the present motion ; that if the House granted relief, it would not be carried on ; but that if the House refused to grant relief, he should be immediately ordered to export the ma chinery. At this moment extensive orders had been given for the improved machine for refining, to be executed contin gently. He had hitherto stated only the injury that would fall on this most important branch of manufacture if no relief were afforded to it. But the injury that would be inflicted upon the people of England was no less entitled to the consideration of the House. The first effect of the existing monopoly was, that the people of England were paying from seven to nine shillings a cwt. more for their sugar than if the raw material were permitted to be im ported. In other words, they were paying a tax to the West India colonial proprietors of 1,500,000/. a year. After stating the quantity of refined sugar made from a cwt. of the raw material, which was about 611b5., and of bastard sugar about 18lbs., the Hon. Member entered into a calculation with respect to the drawbacks and bounties, the result of which was, that in his opinion the bounty could not he less than se. a cwt. At the present moment the manufacturers, reluctant to abandon a trade in which they had involved so large a capital, not only gave up all thoughts of profit, but were actually losing two or three shillings a cwt. Upon the whole, therefore, he had no hesitation to say that the continuance of the restriction inflicted on all sugar consumers in this country a tax of Is. 6d. a cwt., or, in other words, an annual tax of 1,500,000/. paid to the West India proprietors. But was this the only injury inflicted on the people at home ? There were other and still greater evils. By having no market here for foreign sugars, the shipping that went out to foreign ports with our manufactures had not the means of bringing any returns. A petition on this subject had been presented from the merchants and shipowners of Liverpool, not one allegation of which bad ever been contradicted. In that petition it was stated, that in consequence of the monopoly enjoyed by the West India proprietors, for 5,000,000/. in value of our manu• factures exported to foreign ports, we received only 1,000,0001. in value of foreign produce in return. The shipowners were thus deprived of a great share of employ ment. It was also stated on good authority, as an in stance of the working of this monopoly, that whereas four vessels went monthly from Liverpot I to the Brazils last year, not one returned freighted with foreign produce. All this testimony proved, that inasmuch as foreigners found no market here for their produce, there was so much the leas demand for our manufactures. It was so clear that this restriction was contrary to the sound principles of commercial policy, as established by the admission of all parties in that House, that be would not waste the time of the House in insisting on what was an axiom, but he would call their attention to this important circumstance —that when the Orders in Council issued, it was with an express recognition, that they were intended not merely to revive the trade at that moment, but also to protect it for the future. With this understanding, new re fineries were built, and old ones enlarged, and then a mortal and wanton injury was inflicted on the parties con cerned, by depriving them of that benefit, on the assur ance of the continuance of which they had previously been induced to act. He had received letters from all parts of the country, stating that machinery was in preparation for foreign countries, where the regulations were less absurd. Foreign Governments were, in fact, encouraging the re fining trade. But whatever they might do, be confidently believed that, if the British sugar refiners were left un shackled, they would render their trade flourishing, in spite of all opposition. Let them have the means of free exertions, and he was satisfied that their capital and en terprise, whatever might be the restrictive regulations of foreign Governments, would soon enable them to find a market for their manufacture in foreign countries. If the regular trader were unable to do so, the free trader or the smugger would come in, and defeat the vicious laws of foreign Governments, by assisting in the diffusion of those bl e ssings so essential to the comfort of society. He could not anticipate any answer to the case which he bad sub mitted to the House, that could be founded on the ground of justice or necessity. The only answer which could be attempted was, that the present was an inconvenient time. The same argument would probably be urged as had been advanced when he presented a petition for the repeal of the restriction, namely—that at the moment when they were about to make so great a change in their com mercial policy, it would not be wise further to alarm the colonial proprietors by a measure from which they antici pated great injury. He could not admit that that argu bleak was well founded. He could not think that the UreS`t India proprietors ought to receive an advantage at the expense of so large a class of other persons. And, besides, the advantage to the West India proprietors was little more than ideal, while the injury to the sugar re finers was real and severe. It was generally understood that, at any rate, the required relief could not be delayed beyond next year. Now, he would ask, if there teas any validity in the argument for delay, and whether the know ledge on the part of the West India proprietors that the step most..be taken next year, would not have as great an effect upon them as if the step were taken at once ? The best time to effect this desirable object was the present. The time when this country was showing unexampled libe rality to the West India colonies, was the best time to conclude a bargain on the subject under discussion. He begged to call to the recollection of the Noble Lord that the present proposition was only what his Majesty's Go vernment attempted to carry into effect towards the close of the session of 1831. They were then defeated, to the Noble Lord's re,!ret ; but it was generally understood that his M ijesty'l Government was pledged at that time to bring forward a measure of relief early in the coming session. He knew not what might be the understanding between his Majesty's Government and the West India Proprietors ; but when he saw the circumstances which had attended the contract between those parties—when he saw that a loan of fifteen millions had been changed into a gift of twenty millions, he thought it was not too much to expect that if any pledge had existed on the subject, under such different circumstances it might well be with drawn. They had made most serious and important changes in the constitution of the East India Company— changes which he admitted were right as far as the whole nation was concerned, but which had spread ruin over many parishes in the district with which he was con nected. He called upon the House to be consistent and act up to free trade principles in every branch of national industry if they chose to do it in one.—(Hear, hear.) He called upon them in the name of justice, humanity, and common sense, to extend some relief to the sufferings of this industrious and meritorious portion of the community. He should leave the resolution in the bands of the House, in the full confidence that they would deal properly by it. He knew too well lie had not done justice to the subject, but this happily was of no great moment, for the case was such a clear one—the sufferings endured under the pre-ent system were so apparent, that the most common place observer must observe them. He bad worded his motion in general terms, as, if agreed to, a portion of re venue being involved, he thought the arrangements should be left to the proper department of the Government. The Hon. Member concluded amidst cheers, by moving a reso lution to the effect, that it was expedient foreign sugar should be admitted into this country for refining for exportation. Lord ALTHORP was understood to admit the expe diency of the proposition, but the great difficulty attend ing it was to ascertain the manner of effecting the change without interfering with the revenue, and putting into the pockets of the refiners a considerable bounty. Mr. CLAY said " the West Indies." Lord ALTHORP saw no reason that because they gave to one a bounty they should also give it to another—be cause the country suffered an injustice from one class they should submit to an injustice from another. The Hon. Member, in the course of his observations, had given a history of the progress of various measures for refining sugar, and in the course of it had alluded to the Act which expired in 1831, and to his (Lord Althorp's) efforts to get it renewed. He had certainly used his endeavours to effect that renewal. At that time, most Hon. Members o w b e j r e e c t probably tos a r a e n r e a t t n h l a e t n e t . h e A n W d e n st In owli d e ia m b u o s d t y sa s y tr , o t n h g ,, l t y , until they were able to ascertain the amount of the bounty, so as to prevent any unfair dealing for the future, he did s n i o m t u t l hnk would b d i wish it tobedon e e p i r n ope th r e t p o w re re se n n e t tle session iA c. was t tWo enable persons to refine the sugar now in bond, and so export the whole amount without ever paying the duty, and con sequeutly, without there being any drawback. By this arrangement no unfair advantage would accrue to any party. In the commencement of the session he had com munication with the Nest India body, and he bad certainly promised that if, to the measure now proposed by him, they had any reasonable objection, he would not sanction it. He did not think, however, that the West Indians would have. In respect to the motion itself, there was only one word from which he differed, and that was " immediately." If the Hon. Member would consent to the withdrawal of that word, or confine his motion to simply refining the sugar which was in bond, he should not at all object to it. The difficulty which the Govern ment experienced was in ascertaining what amount of refined sugar was equivalent to a cwt. of raw sugar. II should state, however, that if the West Indians objected to the plan he proposed, he should feel himself bound, in respect to his promise, to vote against the Hon. Gentle man. But he was afraid that in doing this they would ' not remedy the evils complained of. Before sitting down he wished to state how impossible it appeared to him to be to form a measure on any principles of justice till they had ascertained a just proportion between refined and raw sugar. Mr. MARRYAT said he believed the West India interest would not oppose the proposition of the Noble Lord. He believed, for his own part, that it would do no harm to the West Indi ns, and no good to the refiners. Mr. HAWES spoke in a very low tone, and we are not sure that we gathered his meaning correctly. We under stood him to recommend that the manufacturers should pay into the hands of the Government an equivalent to the bounty which it might be supposed they would receive, and so all the objections of the Noble Lord the Chancellor of the Exchequer would be at once overcome. Mr. BERNAL believed that the West India interest would neither assent to nor dissent from the proposition of his Noble Friend. Speaking as an individual, he thought it a desirable one. Lord SANDON said if the parties interested simply contended for the power of refining for exportation, and did not desire to interfere with the home market, he did not see how their prayer could be denied. It should be recollected that, since the peace, all Foreign Powers bad adopted a system of protection for their home manufac tures, and they, therefore, must not exp-ct such success as they formerly enjoyed. Last year only, France had paid 760,0001. in bounties, thereby drenching every market, and causing distress to every other nation. He hoped, when such a system was exhausted, to see the trade again revive. To refining sugar purely in hood, he had no ob jection ; but it was a question at such a critical moment, the colonies too having such a dread even of the name of a Sugar Bill, whether another element of alarm should be added to that which already existed in the West Indies. Dr.LUSHINGTON said, that when they were told that capital was rapidly falling away—that trade was stagnant— that industry had no vent—Ministers ought not to let one single hour elapse without giving freedom to this trade. They were bound to look at the actual state of the district in which it had been carried on—to think for those tressed thousands dwelling on the water side, whose sole chance of employ was by the present system completely cut off. What was the use of driving the question over to another year, when the trade would be gone, and reme dies of no avail. What did these sufferers ask ? Nothing hut what was just and right. They demanded no bounty. They acknowledged the title of the West Indians to the home market, and merely claimed to refine for exporta tion—a demand so moderate, so fair, and so reason,ible, that surely the United Parliament would never consent to refuse it. Ile did not think the case so desperate, that no relief could be afforded. Mr. ROBINSON asked whether it would not be bet• ter to accept the Noble Lord's proposition, rather than by refusing it to let the whole question remain over until another session. One proposition hail at least this advan tage, that it was attainable at once, whilst the other was not; for it %as impossible to carry the measure in the teeth of the Government and West India body united. If the Hon. Member pressed his motion to a division, he should certainly vote for it ; but he thought the much better course would be, to accept the offer of the Noble Lord the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Mr. P. THOMSON said he should detain the House but a short time; but if they understood this subject, as he was sure they desired to do, they would agree with him, that it was one of the most important that could be brought under the consideration of the House. If the Hon. Gentleman had studied the question a little more fully, lie would not have spoken in the manner he had done, nor have deemed the question so easy of solution. He did not blame the Hon. Member for the objections he had made to the present system, but because the Hon. Member had not sketched out a plan by which he could effect the object he aimed at. Every one must agree with the Hon. Member, that it was moat desirable the object he had in view should be attained, and that full employment should be given to the inhabitants of the Tower Hamlets. He believed that that Hon. Member desired to effect the object ; but it must be effected in such a manner as to enable the House to adhere to the principle, from which he trusted they would not depart of keeping, so far as it was possible, the monopoly of the sugar refinery for the West Indian sugars, especially now that the system of negro slavery was about to be abolished. His opinion was, that this country should, as much as possible, retain the business of refining for the whole world ; but this could not be done without giving a bounty en such refining, which he thought inexpedient, or admitting fo reign sugars for refining here. He did not believe that this country could become a refining country to any extent without doing the latter of these two things. Still they might do as much as they could to produce that effect. He had already prepared a Bill to admit foreign sugar in bond for refinery. With respect to the political part of the measure, he had nothing to do with it—that he left to the Members of the Government ; but the other part of the Bill he had prepared, and was ready at once to introduce it. Now, however, be was told that such a measure would not satisfy the refiners, who wanted the Bill of 1830. To calculate the amount of duty that should be laid on foreign sugar, it was necessary to proceed on a proper basis. He should to-morrow lay on the table of the House the last report on the experiments undertaken l by Dr. Ure, at the desire of the Government, and car ried on during a period of eighteen months. These were experiments which showed, that on foreign sugars, when refined with West India sugars, there was in fact a bounty paid on their export. He should now state some facts to show bow that bounty operated, and that it therefore became impossible to frame any scale for the admission of foreign sugars on a duty, unless a bounty was given upon foreign sugars when refined, which he hoped that House would not agree to. There had been three expel iments as to the refining of West India sugars. The first was on a parcel of indifferent sugars purchased at the average price, and the only bounty given on that was Is. 6d. On the second experiment the bounty was 55., and on the third it was 6s. ; these were on West India sugars. This bounty would be beneficial to those engaged in the trade, though they would not directly receive it. He had made as many inquiries as he could on the subject, and in spite of the repugnance of most men to exhibit their accounts, or to show the result of the calculations on the process of refining, there was, however, one manufac turer who bad shown him all the banks for the last three years, with calculations of the amount of the bounty. In the first year the amount was 4s. 10d., in the second 4s. 3-1., and in the third year it was 3s. 9d. That showed that there was on such a mode of refining a bounty of from 4.. to ss. if not higher, on every cwt. of West Indian sugar, which was refined in this country. Expe riments had then been made with respect to the refining of foreign sugar, and on the first parcel the bounty was 2.. per cot. That parcel was Brazilian sugar, but when that kind of sugar was mixed with one half of West Indian sugar, the bounty rose from 2s. to 3s. 3d. the cwt. This fact showed that by some chymical combination, the two sugars, when united, could be refined so as to produce a greater value than belonged to either when refined sepa rately. When the Brazilian sugar, subjected to this ex periment, was sugar purchased not at 3s. below the average price, but at the average price itself, it produced, on being refined, a bounty equal to Bs. the cwt. It, therefore, appeared that the yielding of sugars was dif ferent on account of the qualities of the different sugars before being refined, and that could not always be deter mined by the price, so that that could not be relied on as the exact measure on which the drawback could be founded. The revenue ought to be placed in the situa tion of rep lying on export no more than it had received when the sugars were imported for the purpose of refining. He conceived that the result of these experiments must be conclusive, not only to the mind of his Hon. Friend the Member for the Tower Hamlets, but on the mind of the Hon. Member for Worcester. The only course that it in a bttToh p ei o p , etlis e oree a e r al r:uvs t e o : ddon,hf be refiningen n c o oul difficulty d all rto tv be nsugars properlyowbionn allowing sugars bond. i followed, h einn, would hboow. ever, they must bond ds if,Npla, were e p o a r r dn e i on t t g o ot b ob e l met ed t rwaf from emh of this thethe d state i r ffi efi c u n e l difficulty. the market, to reline such sugars for home consump tion. The refiner could not always depend on exportation alone. Yet if he refined sugars in bond, he must be stopped from receiving the benefit of the heme market, so fir ,is related to such sugars. This would not give him all the advantage it was desirable to afford him. In giving him the liberty of refining sugars in bond, it would not he advisable to permit him to refine foreign sugars only, hut lie must be allowed to mix foreign sugars with them, for one great advantage to the refiner, as be had shown, was in 'mixing these different sugars in the process of refining. Their object, therefore, must be to enable the hesilould without object, pay be cause him to bring together these two q ualities of su g ar. He single exception e t p h should propose, therefore , to p ermit all su g ars in bo nd to t e i on end h ofe had h i already s Hon. stated. be refined for the purpose of exportation went of the duty. That would answerg he believed there co u l d be no other that would not be in some degr ee more or l ess injurious to the revenue. Friend o pp T os o it a e isl with plan e a sin other h Then came another important branch of the queetion— namely, the bounty on West India sugars. The Hon Wigned knew the to it ; hut he in the Bill : Member had said, in reply to the observation made , that House could not wish to act on the prinir giving a bounty to foreign sugars. " Why, you bounty on West India sugars—then why not on sugars—if it is good in one case, it must be I another—if it be just in one case it must be another." In that principle he concurred, and be that opportunity of saying that his conviction west the only means they had of settling this question wr of doing what was just to all parties, namely, per) the industry of the people of this country to be envl furnishing, if they could, all the markets of the woi taking care that neither of these things should Lappet on the one hand, the people of this country should pay a higher price for the article they consumed ill sequence of the bounty that was given oa sugars to ' ported—nor on the other hand, that the refiners suffer to the same extent. The only course which could adopt was to determine that all sugars which mained in this country, but were intended for tion, whether British, colonial, or foreign sugars, be allowed to be refined while in bond. It was not. that the quality of sugar had most extraordinarily proved in the Vest Indies, so that they now brought' almost in a refined state from the colonies, but it entered as raw sugar, and came in at a duty of He would state, if the Committee would permit him, example to show the mode in which, from their - drawbacks, viscious schemes were resorted to for benefit at public expense. These were with the getting sugar in at a low duty to send it out and a high drawback. Latterly a process had been . in the West Indies, by which one boiling of sugar duced it so much chrystallized, that it could, without ther process in purifying, be brought over here, and ' admitted on paying a duty of 24s , could at ono, by being put into a mould, and put through a stoves without further trouble or expense, pass the stair' single loaf sugar, and receive a bounty of 365. , hear.) This had frequently been done. By the struction of the Act of Parliament regulating these 1 ters, it had become possible for him to suspend tbr thod of defrauding the revenue, but there daily _ instances of attempts to bring in sugar more and more fined, so as just to get within the law and obtain drawback. Another consequence of the same thin' that they were getting to refine sugars in the ' dies, and not here. He should not say any thing that being just or fair with regard to this country, cr the policy of encouraging or discouraging it. If F could prosper there, let it do so, but let it not atti prosper at the expense of the revenues of this _ Then came the question of the bounty. One resew' the opinion he entertained on this subject was, that it impossible to frame a scale of a proper draw!- - - show this he should make a short statement, and take the bounty as at 45., which he believed to be the mark. Was the House.aware of the amgnt , tax thus levied on the people of this country? total amount of sugars imported into this menu,' subsequent exportation was worth four millions,' - and amount of the duty equal to 800,000/. They could get rid of that but by doing away with the dr, altogether. The revenue, however, did not stn• the amount of 800,000/, but to the amount of fourth of that sum. But as the price of sugar the same in this country as when it was sent , and that was the priceless the bounty, the price was by the amount of the bounty. They should take sures to know whether the duty had been paid or before they allowed the bounty on the sugar after being refitted. He apologised for having . the House so long, and expressed his hope that the Member would alter his motion to the following' "That it is expedient that sugar under lock be . for refining, for the purpose of exportation." That give him all he required, unless he was preparei to just w some plan founded on a scale of duties altogether from the present, or unless he wished to give a tio llitki. l e isi4-441':I t taltii o il:111.tiiii:e."- o nse n vii.iht:lll°:l b lc:. se a) i uihsouii e °l:tto q tauYwl e :)uidn u 'hit t :.whinlieb!: e i n keaea a sill to the export of foreign sugar; a scheme to which, it to be hoped, the House would not give their Mr. EWART wished to ask the Right Hon. man whether he was prepared to adopt immediately 1 founded on the resolution he had proposed? Mr. P. THONISON should be prepared to do sot lees that scheme was opposed by the West India . He was prepared, if neceoiary, to bring in the Bill at Mr. PATRICK STEWART said that the m otion ceeded the limit put forth in the petition. All that West Indians wanted was to be dealt justly with ; ' defended them from the imputations cast on them Right Hon. Gentleman. As to the observations distress, he thought that that ought to be put or question ; for it was but distress against distress. they required was, to be secured against the of those slave-driving colonies, where the cost . was less than in our colonies. The colonies woe so much injured by the change now about to be that they must depend on something more than the port trade. They wished that the sugar refiners of country shou l d be put into good spirits, but th; haPPen. should not be done at the expense of th e sunken graded colonies. 17s Jamaic a it Mr. Alderman THOMPSON had come down wi th ' N:2" -- (, Rear, h, intention of supporting the motion of his Hon. Friend Ic t ilti the e O l O Member for the Tower Hamlets); but after the ' /ro t a "e than p e able speech of the Right Hon. Gentleman, be had a vitt Mitsionaries I mined to support . the amendment, if it should be P d ! Rote and 1144 the, such. His Majesty's Ministers did right in deternii:, It to Llst d one ' to even at that late period of the session, to relieve tha t Ma t ..",, Produce portant branch of the commerce of our country. 1 11-ast Period of thought that the Hon. Member for the Tower 1 4 2 t 4 , ll ttrlhie am , ought to be satisfied with the Right Hon. Gentlet":.-, proposition, at least for the present session. ../ kliii Mim e si l o. nt h a Mr. D. W. HARVEY congratulated th e Ma. P r ot *ef t I ' a b ody 0 ber for the Tower Hamlets, upon the Gov e r n m e nt b h tlk tll ttestatitie est conceded—for such he thought they had d one .. .411 J they testi % had been asked. He was a convert to the doctrines (1 , ih:"'sllg* at a ° o3 llY ' Right Hous e determinedH on. Gentleman , althoughoppose him. T h h e e R h i a g d ht e u nt a e n re e .4 ...,11 1iti04...4te emai , - ,7° at ' Thi n tleman had succeeded in that di ffi cult matter of me' ' .e e 1 °tit h dry technical subject interesting .—( Hear.) Mr. EWING defended the West Indians from th s t i . tinge 44 t0 Y potation which he alleged bad been unjustly cast on .; by the Right Hon. Gentleman. Mr. BRISCOE congratulated the Hon. Mos he ) f rom t h ll l .° Y u co th a °‘) l,l ( the Tower Hamlets on his success, and congratuls Of the kiti e s tice, i n country on the results which must follow from the 4 6 Of, l i t t itu oi t of 4.0, of the Right Hon. Gentleman, since he had stand/ ,atigh tet leot a , not less than eight hundred thousand pounds were v' s 00 , ' l ' l 4. The a tax by the people of this country. He trusted the tll at 4 , i 'Pin S money would in future be allowed to remain in the ' ,d ,yi,. ° the Ho t a' f "41 '(1.,„ of the sugar consumers ; the more especially, 1 y e ,, -gnu amount would be sufficient to pay the interest e• -4 14, 0 p:roiled large sum which the Parliament had just voted t t y o l , tt_ . the negro emancipation.—(Hear.) 0 1 %4 a of ler 7 A Colonel TORRENS was happy that his Mars 'Res at peen s vernment had abandoned the Bill with respect to re ' 'hie - .: (11 ' 9bl . F Y ror 1 . 1 . 1 sugar, and to the present proposition be gave his ` o lde r o .. Is 0%1 cordial support. a 44y:ti ; society t44 l4 e r te d itiP° ool r er il i f re. ( he t I l _ l i eeessary standc o 111 Colonial . i a CLAY ithats utghaer , w ßt i ih s l hie e would k ap n se o r w mt b permit e w t h fto e hr r ee h i e gr r ne fi b ; n e ia w nng a d s ,o t sf o ec"o u lr e f , whether the Bill wonld permit the introduction is t c ° , Th i 'Qour for British market of the British Colonial Sugar, so re 6 j 4 ) i t e. (411tition 'a bond, on the payment of a fair and adequate duty ? o f t hat a u TANLT Mr. P. THOMSON answered, that with respect 'fa ( tizek tit ::: : :la v l e te w r al first question, he had only to say, that his plan wed 0 4 Art der, and F t ‘P r i' l t ah r: r th efi er ne t r ha th n e th ad at va o n f t t a h g e e H o o f n i . nix l% i l n e g mb d e i r ff , e a r s en it t w so o r u ts ld o rl bi With e respect that it co t u o ld the e secondadmitted fo rif the e would t b l e a t: l3 ;4 in bond was allowed to be re fi ned along with d id t t o l t i sli se „ f t't his sugar, who could answer that the foreign sugar vit'yrj t 5 t i, wilt escape with it, and come into the home market ? ~r P ; , e4 t y t : "to foreign could be kept apart from the colonial 04 ,;110 r e u tsqra e , n 4 ‘, as t should conceive it would be a less advantage to the to p eat o f ma who would then be unable to mix them in his r e ~,f v e t ,,` 4l ter Jr. nal If the Bill should be introduced in the course of t" - ' . 1 1 14 tatie n L am t 1 session, it would be an ingredient of that plan that", ,%144 petit Plantation sugar should be refined in bond, and te r "" i‘ tl ir 4 er i r i ) t heed witted for home consumption on the payment of j i l sr,; ti t the (10,. .!1te n but then if foreign sugar in bond was also allosreu e , te terni.),, iz refined, they must be kept in separate places. ~ he); th: ° •7•(Ch eer , Mr. HUME recommended that a clause shoul d i . e r i , , :"rutu t h ' troduced to allow refiners to work during part of If, 1 Il ll t t r',_ re lY abeii, h ' for home consumption, and during another part of "' j! 1 1 41 a. w s 1 for exportation. 04t 4 Ilopo t il tiiil: t i e ee t i tt il ' sil i tk l oiit i r r o n o.th d e dve e ti utli r t rca h e o t: r ie , ,it. % a t ipt n etk rttl em Mr. P. THOMSON remarked, that the P ° 011 i ti i het', f 4 r t heir °ur 01 fully established in the Bill. The refinery for es 0 1 i ti t . 1. foud eu was to be carried on in premises to be apprev o tie fil e lt .t i ttl•Pe l li Customs, and under lock. As soon as the V l ore ce rt . 'Wal l e a ' sugar which had not paid duty had been entirely o ld p ot in day s ,.. t l ll out, the lock would be taken off, and the refiner ivoiog‘ ea only e ro ,,, able to carry on his ordinary trade for the home gl i 4 ha lal S ta in et e ote Mr. CLAY agreed to withdraw his motion. e ~„,,, of soeit ABOLITION OF SLAVERY. ~ forf Ith eth ask, i f Mr. STANLEY moved the order of the der 4" it er th the at ey w Committee on the Slavery Abolition Bill. Oa / Ste k ..,a ba se o tion that the Speaker do leave the chair, he 0 6 , 14 th'' tii illosed Mr. F. BUXTON rose, in order to move t he ) li k „ . e !Jewels% and considered it neither safe nor satisfactosP, e G I „ I tliot t in le g i o , anxious to call the attention of the House to ti 1 tf# eta i t ztent. atmin:itnoi mortification h i a n n h d e t hdheiaLlapbpgooilviinteitnomnneonottifcaest.latvheeArylnlaftetuhltroesetobile4 1 I, 44 , 7iltti 7 t l oni t eguittibe:: , e a n ec made in it, which would all be found benefle°o.) 1 1 1 it I Z t ut the tint venter and detrimental to the negro.--(Cl e bee. 10 4 4,1 11 ti theek t d reading over the Bill, b e (M r . F. Buxton) ha tog 0 0 00 Qns of t ee, prised to find that n o l ess th an 29 s ubjects rel_.% tad feeding, clo th ing, a n d g ov er n men t of the OCIPW could not by the reepei - other lo( or by bis in reference authority of enacted an extends, the enacta , and Assem as aforesaid, or , Council 01 k dinances, or, 01 ing and e I as afore same or any In this 1 , l'egrors also to know planters had ' employed for lo nger, in a.cae and in A not only the ' of the ma The resul taken as a atd finally !zillions. 11 knowledge In April w 11 utipt in A upon this West to g ttion, le West entitled ti their cond He 'enty milli Cheers. that : perishable a works )lantern ild ren Upon a❑ (Hear.) 41 the cont ' it," I Indies, '►n it -(Ch, twice secondl ogle ou a ofthis nii PPrenticeship reaiy to of appr but to the E Wi but tht with, and vas a di a dowi tut what Was neit of del us i o 4 414 11 vaput ° l negr that ne l i ► Imd IPl:vePpnricgierl::edd t il (. ( 1, , tll Iti . ' E I t la s .4:': ,4l4 4''t e trd a , .ed " % n i ._ tti i t t . bi• it , ' ;, ' l ' ,4 d i 3 : ,, ,t':...nanatieyyoo.ntnhtfec ot:roeotee'gneur,rtreoxsabo,aellusut(teltsytbineeYlahatdunnesenoihednidotctiladrril o,fe9s,sta'lrtti, : o , v':n bn ei u ollwenrid eu lia‘ v sg irt a oeii t o , t bd: h c o c n a ' , l ifjleiphli tyd sl i c s P °''cir t .ibi e b' si telt b etc* the! )tt , ol l g '11:0e 'thatt ( 1 'I liti g , tri 1-1 L 'tj i i4l l, s . . 1 rdi ri 10 °1 ip i il'l ,4 ' 1 171 Itf i ll :_.l t,i ' i t t ' e. ''' l'''ct ii s l ) r' rt.,iy i‘t€ lte .‘ i 0 o v t, t0 t..1 1 'te e ll'te i ) i'a t : ibv tir it ub r n y . t a. ro aso' :ll ' 3:i t. . n ' p e bn k a o 'l 8: i a a l n i k f m r t°t nk o n n t th l y n; tn e c hrld pA • h e e ' - jo g i lee F I tep a h'o wp Afvherur x v f r e d i ßre ti a' o ni t e e i sad i r ta o i ea enp}lb't ,l R th e ' —' a , Mori are, she th In this i notarial° .ght alsoe temps inarily i ° . ; t 1 to knot of os tpt °n eer, in t him, °J . d "Y ' an d • " Kir le, ' not n o ' n it syste— st , . n ,.„ -..y. t h e for privo.i h ooded of the in is object' koui d The rest d recei t ikt kft, be ta ken as en a doPtr Itilli oil . rwardg con sugar Pr r l i P ' s lll. -d finall ithout fli t ' it , f .' milli nns. Y standar d ° ,l Co t -..„ upon thi 1.---(llorfeetiv-`4 West ulthrßor)daaiiitdiadttioehialuenotootrpcae:reioji°4,'"' ta L.,,r,etle viti : tati rea ovi d lioa y tsla t ti o ersli ha e t r : lse ' ' , td „ c ure ii_itha it r . , entitled id more ( rl4, , N their con . , 10 ~, 11.0 1 „, obtain ' ''''ia ti go. He thing tOViot era wenty mil e West qi state' :"(Cheer :hing rib°:, t Was t aellt that ry, or sha!, ",it soi l !' Perishabl If indu toih 'ad a t o , of L e th e , ora Y r 4414 re uPon a 3:librtrhaeCCaeakt°x7lipi::'ortWrrwilf°44(lll(ll.;(ll-111:: (Hear. t , -.r. and shoo: t h e - "l veet i t. ,, o be beP tj " 4 bens "t Indies sint of iZttier44 upon i 1 itry ? I ,', ,lb het har.--(c country if, „,° e alone a co, and 1'413,,,d twiceY ' could a"aits*"ad Iv , t h r , secom e drawhi, „" t e4 , l Peodle o s uffer " Zit e t 01 this n unt of ol lcd "eYarkentice h. vtg th e 'vete s IE sugar i %ti e real t ent abra s j p r o teer h et of ap , a was roi' 1404 g! , but) pes' but t h th at take I 1 1 , e, the ng detai°4 s ha t thk,ara, wit' at the I h.' u 'ty, ;" Was a d ng farm' s ,,i e i .) 3 1 a dov be adtvi tt j h t t he I ty " What That Olt 0 tit:tell). g er Olt h eard ' l de l ' w a , mod her differt,ilt s al of 13001 i dl 4 ' a n e a 00 ea , e at , yap° a t iiharlt h t i nihtnc e es B.h t ° l l l Y h 'i stG'i e a a: b i t °o i f i ti t, i tvl b t 444:1:-1.41::::::11: V ' 'l'll '4 I(4e.eel' a 'WU):::BthSeti ti.isVohei°:hellefrnaahl.onttOu. ' ieht'luan:l 'd': tO' Ite eh n ' 4 ? ' 4 to Of liti 4 "ed 4, N a 98 3 1 :t .t i :o no n t if t: pe t ::::::;; 'r t i . :l4 l : ; ' ,te t ( r :t :vil: ll utre:e L y . ;,, s. n ig ßada tl i.. t al) nt d : le ls i i wool 4 4 air `Y"--it u to be Ifl sd e ; t tv t4 e 'ite ta a:y e e e r '. wit than the s,, ta , Oty Hy. nets of ' k N't4 millions ‘ - ' ll st hba; season iken and ' '''the Pen ' 11,,,, r COLIISEQUP . 8