The Sun. — London, England, 1830-02-17 00:00:00

FitoAl THE GAZETTE OF LAST NIGHT. Lord Chamberlain's- Office, Feb. 15, IS3O. The king has been pleased to appoint the Honourable Cecil Forestei., one of the Grooms of His Majesty's Bed chamber, in the room of the Honourable Major-General Henry King. Crown-Office, Feb. 16. MEMBERS RETURNED TO SERVE IN THIS PRESENT PAR- LIAMENT. ROROUGH LEOSIINSTER. John Ward, of liolwood, in the parish of Keston, in the comity of Kent, in the room of Rowland Stephenson, Esq. whose seat has become vacated under the provisions (A the Act 52, Geo. 111. c. 144. BOROUGH OF WEST LOOS• Charles Buller the younger, of Polvellan, in the county of Coravrall, Esq. in the room of Charles Buller, Esq. who has accepted the Chiltern Hundreds. Commissi•rn in the Illoxham and Banbury Corps of Yeomanry Cavalry, signed by the Lord Lieutenant of the county of Oxford. H. P. Bcat, Gent, to be Cornet, Dec. 11. Whitel'lll, Jan. 23. The Lord Chancellor has appointed William Kitchener, of Newmarket, in tl►e county of Cambridge, Gent., to be a Alasttr Extraordintry in the High Court of Chancery. Whitehall, Feb. 11, The Lord Chancellor has appointed Robert Furley, of the city of Canterbury, Gent., to be a Master Extraordi nary in the High Court of Chancery. DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY. Henry Paulin, Berwick-upon-Tweed, innkeeper. 13ANKRUPTS. Mary Ann -7 Alorrixon, to surrender March 12, 13, and 30. at ten, at Mr. Mackey's Office, Bath. Mackey, Bath ; Williams and Bethell, Lincoln's inn-6.elds, London. William Bond, Horstead, Norfolk, bricklayer, Feb. 25, at six, 26, at ten, and March 30, at two, at the Bowling green, Inn , Norwich. Dsvenev, Norwich ; Hammond. and Sharp, Hatton-garden, London. Thomas Dixon and Thomas Foster Dixon, esoss, Middlesex, sail-makers, Feb. 19, at ten, 23, and March 30, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners. Cox, PoUltry. William Henry Stunt, King-square, St. Luke's, dyer, Feb. 22, March 2, and 30; at ten, at the Court of Com mi,sioners. Castle, Brewer-street, St. Pancras. 3oseph Tarver, Wolverton, Wirwickshire, carpenter, reb. 22, at Feven, 23, and March 20, at eleven, at the office of Mr. Burbury, Warwick, Meyrick and Cox, Red Lion-square. Jarn;.sPotts, New - castle-upon-Tyne, merchant, March I I , 12, and 30, at eleven, at the Georo Inn, Novcasfe. Meggi son and Pringle, King's-road, 134:dford-row ; Donkin and S table, Newcastle. Michael West, York-gate-yard livery-stables, Regent's_ park, horse-dealer, Fel,. 23, at twelve, March 2, at eleven, and 30, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners. Todd, Gray's-inn. lloykett Breeds, Hastings, Sussex, merchant, Feb. 26, at eleven, March '2, at nine, and 30, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Heathcote, Coleman-street. John Wilson Neil, Maiden-lane, varnish-manufacturer, Feb. 23, March 2, and 30, at eleven, at the Court of Com tnivioners. Fyson and Beck, Lothbury. Edward Tutt, Nlarylebone-lane, oilman, Feb. 26, March 2, and 30, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. Star ling, Leicester-square. M‘Raith and Daniel M'Coig, Windmill-street, Tottenham-court. road, tailors, Feb. 23, at otte, March 2, at ekv,n, and 30, at twelve, at the Court of Commis sioner,. Bailey, Berners-street, Oxford-street. Robert Hall, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, hatter, March 8, 9, and 30, at eleven, at the George Inn, Newcastle-upon- Flexney, New Boswell-court, Lincoln's Inn-fields; Lambert, Newcastle. Samuel Williamson, jun., Salford, Lancashire, grocer, Feb. 26, 27, and March 30, at one, at the Clarendon buildings, Liverpool. Cheater, Staple-iun ; Ilinde, Liverpool. Daniel. Weaver, Winsley, Shropshire, timber-mer chant, March 1,2, and 30, at eleven, at the Fox Inn, Shrewsbury. Philpot and Stone, Southampton-street, Blootnsbury ; Burley and Scarth, Shrewsbury. James Travis, New Inn, Soyland, York, innkeeper, Feb. 26, at five, 27, at eleven, and March 30, at four, at the Offices "of Messrs. Alexander, Halifax. Emmett, :dery-ins, London ; Alexander, Halifax. - Joseph Boulderson, Penryn, Cornwall, miner, March 3, 4, and 30, at eleven, at the Star Inn, Heiston, Corn wall. Follett, Paper-buildings, Temple; Roberts, Hd ston, Cornwall. Arthur Clark, Blackburn, Lancashire, draper, March 3, at six, 4, at ten, and 30, at twelve, at the Hotel, Black burn. Haworth, Blackburn ; Norris, Allen, and An thony, 1;1,n-street, Bedford-row, London. Matthew Forster, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, lead-merchant, Feb. 18, March 10, and 30, at the Crown and Thistle Inn, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. - Richardson, Shield, and Thompson, Poultry; Fenwick, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Elias Croft, Louth, Lincolnshire, tanner, Feb. 25, at seven, 26, and March 30, at eleven, at the New King's Head Inn, Louth. Shaw, Ely-place, Holborn; Wilson, Louth. Peter Hammond, Sheffield Moor, Yorkshire, grocer, Feb. 22, 23, and March 30, at eleven, at the office of Mr. Bernard John Wake, Sheffield. Walter, Symmond's Inn ; Wake, Sheffield. William Wheatland, Askham, Nottinghamshire, chair turnvr, March 1, at twelve, and one, and 30, at twelve, at the White Hart Inn, East Retford. Dawson and Hawkins, New Boswell-court, Carcy.street, London ; Mee and Bigsbv, East Retford. George Earl Taylor, Clithero, Lancashire, cotton-spinner, Much 2 and 3, at eleven, at the office of Mr. William Charnley, Preston, Lancashire ; and March 30, at twelve, at the Hotel, Blackburn, Lancashire. Hurd and Johnsen, King's Bench-walk, Temple; Charnley, Preston. Thomas Ayles, Weymouth and Melcombe-Regis, Dor set, ship-builder, Feb. 25, 2ti, an•l March 30, at ten, at the office of Mr. John Henning, Melcombe-Regis, Dorset. Alexander and Son, Carey-street. Thomes Goater, Cliddcstlen, Southampton, timher•mer ehant, F e b, 26, at six, 27, at nine, and March SO, at thief, at the George inn, Andover. Boustield, Chatham-plac:!, Blackfriara, London ; Mann. Andover. Evelyn Richard Sutton Falkner, South Hill, Notting ham, schoolmaster, March 4, at six, 5, and 30, at eleven, at the Flying Horse Inn, Nottingham. Andrew, Notting ham ; Hall and Brownley, New Boswell -court, Carey street. Joseph Birkbeck Blundell, Israel Piper, and Joseph Tho►nas Gritton, Bankside, Surrey, iron -merchants, Feb. 19, at twelve, 26, and March 30, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. Keareey and Hughes, Lothbury. DIVIDENDS. J. Scott, Cateaton-street, warehouseman, April 2, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners—W. Brown and J. Douglas, Liverpool, merchants, March 25, at two, at the office of Mr. J. Hodgson,' Liverpool—W. Johnson, Goole, Yorkshire, druggist, March 9, at twelve, at the Old Sand hill Inn, York—G. Children, Toobadge, banker, March 12, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners—W. Jeffs, Isa bella-place, Kennington, brewer, March 9, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners—T. Rider, Ashton-under- Lyne, Lancashire, cotton-spinner, March 15, at ten, at the White Boar Inn, Manchester—W. Plenty,West-smith 6eld, iron-founder, March 9, at nine, at the Court of Commissioners—E. Denis, J. Lambert, and J. Severe, Upper Tbames-street, wholesale grocers, March 9, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners—C. Sweet, North Tawtoe, Devonshire, tanner, March 9, at eleven, at the Old London lan, Exeter. CERTIFIC ATM-4U ac v 9. J. Fletcher, Binbrook Saint Mary, Lincolnshire, victualler—J. Grayston, Bury St. Edmund's, Suffolk, cutler—R. Nicholson, Bradford, Yorkshire, earthenwate manufacturer—J. Dow, Great Russell-street, Bedford square, auctioneer—John Whitehead, Lad-lane, warehouse man—T. Peelc, Peterborough, Northamptonshire, corn merchant—E. Kilsby, Nine Elms, Surrey, ship-breaker-- J. Bidmead, Cheltenham, plumber. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. J. Tregoning, R. Wilson, and J. Jolleads, Manchester, warehousemen—J. Carter aid J. lies, Farringdon, Berk shire, bakers—O. Stone and W. Freeth, Fish-street-hill, haberdashers._-G. Robotham and G H. Simmons, Bir mingham, patten mannfaett rers--S. Phil ,rick, jun., T. Plsilbrick, and J. Philbriek, Reading, Berkshire, curriera ---3. Clapham and W. Abbott, Leeds, stuff-presser—T. Elkington and G. Smith, Coventry, mercers-.-G. Gotta and W. Hallett, Holt, Norfolk, tailors—A. Kirkpatrick 4 ad S. M'Kean, Portaea, tea-dealers—A. Brookes apd E. Brookes, Sheffield, painters—R. S. and G. Barton, Sheffield, stove-grate manufacturers—D. Birchall,Binge, and R. AsLail, Winstanley, Lancashire, delf•masters—J. Claugh too, J. Bunting, P. Stubbing, John Coller, and W. Batt son, Chesterfield, wine-snerehants—T. Stebbing, and J. St 'bhigg, jun., Paglesbarn, Essex, farniers,--J. Keene, sen. an I J. Keene, jun., !net-chant-tailors—J. Barrington and W. Dfiakwitter, Alaucliv.zter sinall-ware-wanufactuier— I'. Webb and C. Ebtworat, Pudding-lane, wine- merchan' s --4. Jowett, J. Bottomley, A. Staden, and J. Barren; Guiselcy, Yorkshire, scribbling-millers. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT, HOUSE OF LORDS.-(LAST NIGHT.) The twelve Judges met this morning for the purpose of giving judgment ih the case of Rook and Dean, which came before their Lordships on a writ of error. The ease originally came on in the Common Pleas, and that Court pronounced judgment upon it. It was taken to the King's Bench, which reversed the decision of the Common Pleas. Their Lordships affirmed the decision of the King's Bench. The House adjourned during pleasure at a Quarter past Four o'clock. The LORD CHANCELLOR took his seat on the Woolsack at a Quarter past Five, but there being no business to pro • teed with their Lordships adjourned a few minutes after wards. HOUSE OF COMMONS—(LAST NIGHT.) The &TAKER. took the Chair at Four o'clock. LONDON BRIDGE. Mr. Alderman WOOD brought up the Report on the London Bridge Bill. Mr, Alderman WOOD presented a petition from the in. habitants of the ward of Cripplegate, complaining of ge neral distress, and praying for a reduction of taxation.— The Hon. riletnher gave notice that on the 23d inst. lie should submit a motion to the Home respecting the price of coals. Lord ALTIIORP presented a petition from North ampton, and two others from places in that county, com plaining of the distressed state of the country, and praying for a reduction of taxes. After a few words from Mr. CARTWRIGHT, the petitions were ordered to he printed. Mr. PANE proented a similar petition from a parish in Oxfordshire. ➢lr. HUME gave notice of the following motions : On the Bth of March—For a Committee to enquire into the expediency of abolishing the British Settlement at Sierra Leone. On the 10th March—To abolish the offices of Receiver General of Land and Assessed Taxes, and to transfer the duties of such office to the Excise. • On the 16th Ilareh—To move fur the appointment of a Committee, to inquire into the circumstances attending the Renewal of Leases of Crown Lands at Harwich and other places. On the 23d March—To abolish the office of Lord Lieu tenant of Ireland.—(Great laughter.) Mr. HUME then moved that the names of Mr. O'Con• nell and Mr. Cust be added to the Committee on the So lt Vestry Bill.—Ordered. The Hon. MEMBER then moved for a return of the number of bankrupts that have been committed to New gate, Whitccross-street prison, the King's Berwh, and other prisons of the metropolis, by the Commissioners of Bat:- rupts. Lord J. STUART presented a petition from the county of Glamorgan, praying for a reduction of taxation. MALT TAX. Mr. SLANEY gave notice that on the 9th of March he should submit a motion to the House to abolish the restrictions in the manufacture of malt. LEATHER TAX. Mr. G. MOORE presented a petition from the tan ners of the city of Dublin, praying for a repeal of the tax on leather. LAW OF LIBEL. Mr. O'CONNELL said, that on Wednesday, the 3d of March, he should bring on the motion of which he had given notice, declaring that Truth is not, nor shall not be a Libel. Mr. BENETT presented a petition from a parish in Wilts, complaining of the general distress of that part of the country, and praying for a reduction of taxes. The Honourable Member said that he could bear witness to the distress mentioned by the petitioners, and hoped when the question relating to the distress of the country came before the House, it would meet with that attention its importance demanded. Mr. PORTMA N, in rising to support the petition, said he was astonished the other evening to hear the Ministers of the Crown deny that distress existed in the country. When be heard such a statenient, be could not let his constituents imagine that he sat mute. He however could assure the House, from his own knowledge, that the distress of the country. was general ; it was not confined to the agricultural interests, hut affected every class of the community. Ministers must take off many taxes ; the malt tax, for one, would afford great relief, but not only that, but many others most be taken off and one substituted that would fall on those who were able to pay; one which would touch the pockets of. absentees as well as those residing in this kingdom. Minis ters must boldly come forward and do this: if they did not feel themselves strong enough to bring forward such mea sures, they must enlist- those into their service that would be bold enough to: do their duty, for the country must be relieved, and if not speedily, Ministers would then see by the petitions that would be poured in from all parts, what a state of distress existed. He had thought it proper to make these observations, to negative the assertion of his Majesty's Ministers denying that distress existed. Sir JOHN WROTTESLEY gave notice that, on Thursday next, he should present a petition from Lich field, in the county of Stafferd, against the practice of paying labourers' wages with goods• THE LATE PROSECUTIONS. Sir CHARLES WETHERELL gave notice, that on Wednesday, the 3d day of March, he should move for copies of the ex-officio information, the remarks of the Judge, and the words made use of by the Jury in de'ivering their verdict, is the late prosecu tions against the Morning Journal. Colonel SIBTHORPE gave notice that upon the 3d of March he should move a Resolution for the repeal of the standing order of the House relativ., to the non-admis sion of strangers, as far as it regarded Reporters, and also to provide for their better accominodation. 7 —(Hear, hear.) DISTRESS IN IRELAND. Mr. BROWNLOW presented a petition from the inha bitants of Claragh, in the Queen's County, Ireland, in which they complained of very great distress. This peti tion, though not got up for the purpose, contained a com plete answer to the sta - ement made by some Hon. Mem bers, who asserted that Ireland was in a state of prosre rity. The contrary was the fact. The most dreadful die tress prevailed in Ireland. He believed, that were they to search through the wide world, greater distress could no where be found than existed at present in Ireland. The Hon. Member for Wiltshire had said that the wages for a labouring man in his part of the country were not more than 3a. dd. per week. He was very sorry for it ; but he begged leave to state what was the rate of wages in Ire land. It was well known, from the evidence taken before a commission which bad been appointed to inquire into the subject, and it had not been yet contradicted, that the whole wages of the labourers in Ireland did not exceed 3d. a day per head. The petitioners therefore prayed the House, that, considering the deep distress of the country, they would be pleased to extend the system of poor-laws to Ireland, and he could not help wishing that those laws, .or something approaching to them, might be adepted. After a few words from Mr. BENETT, the petition was laid on the table. Mr. STANLEY presented a petition from King's County, Ireland, praying the House to take into its con sideration the state of the Poor Laws. • Mr. MARSHALL presented a petition from the:town of Leeds, against the renewal of the East India Com pany's Charter. Mr. WHITMORE was induced to believe that all his Majesty's Ministers were not agreed upon the subject. The Hon. Member concluded by asking, whether it was the in tention of his Majesty's Ministers to give notice in April of the cessation of the Company's Charter in three years. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER did not know what the Hun. Member meant by saying that his Majesty's Ministers were not agreed open the subject. His Majesty's Government went into the argument upon the Committee, without any engagements, and free from all pledges. With respect to the question put forth by :the Honourable Member, he (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) could not but think the 'Honourable Mem ber must be under a mistake with respect to it. There was no necessity to give notice of it till April, 1831. Before that period arrived many circumvances might arise which would affect the course his Majesty's Govern ment might take. Mr. WHITMORE expressed himself satisfied. Sir G. PHILLIPS believed that the Committee had caused great jealousy in the manufacturing districts, particularly on account of an Hon. Friend of his (Mr. Marshall) being rejected from that Committee. Mr. ASTELL referred to two cases in which the Fast India Company had been of the utmost service in relieving the distress that existed in the manufacturing districts. ARMY ESTIMATES.—RETRENCHMENTS. Sir H. HARDINGE brought up the Army Estimates for the current year ; and upon the motion that they do lie upon the table, gave notice of hie intention to move the Estimates in Committee of Supply on Friday next. Mr. HUME wished to put-a question to the Chancellor of the Exchequer in reference to something that fell h-til him hut night, and which seemed to hare hcco ruisapinc heeded. The Committee of Supply stood postponed till ta-morrow (Wednesday), and it lad been understood that the Right Hon. Gentleman intended to state the reduc tions which Ministers were prepared to make in our esta blishments upon that occasion. He now wished to know whether the Chancellor of the Exchequer would go into the subject of these retrenchments on Wednesday, or on a future evening. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER should be obliged to move the Committee of Supply to-morrow evening, in order to fennel a vote of ways and mean,. thereon ; but it was not his intention to go into the sub ject referred to on that occasion. When his Gallant Friend moved the Army Estimates on Friday, he (Mr. Goulburn) would then state the reductions which Mi nisters proposed to make on all the estimates of the year. Mr. HUME put it to the Gldlant Secretary at War, whether the House ought to be called cn to vote any part of the Estimates on Friday, when in all probability Mem leers would only have seen them on the morning of that day. He should wish for a day or two to consider them, particularly as reductions were talked of. Sir 11. HARDINGE said that the Hon. Meracr should have a printed copy of the Army Estimates in his possesson to-morrow evening, or early on Thursday morning. Mr. R. GORDON wished to know whether the House would be put in possession of the number of military officers who held civil situations. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER had no intention of bringing forward such a return, but it wa , competent to the lion. MeralJer to move for the informa tion required, if he pleased. Mr. GORDON—The Right Hon. Gait. has no objec tion to such a motion. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER intimated that he had not. Sir F. BURDETT said, if reductions of such a nature as was understood last night were to be brought forward, the House would require some little time to consider them. He believed he was rather obscure in what he stated last night on the subject of the motion of his Hon. Friend the Member fur Montrose; and there was one point in respect of which he wished to set himself right with the House and his Hon. Friend. He should be sorry to have it sup posed that he had desired . in any degree to depreciate the value of the motion which his lion Friend had brought forward so ably, though he thought that there were other measures of equal or• even greater importance towards the relief of the depre>sion which was, unfortunately, so pre valent. _ Lord J. RUSSELL hoped, that when the Right Hon. Gentleman stated, on Friday, the reductions to be made in the estimates, he would also state what relief was to be afforded the country in the amount of taxation. Sir H. HARDINGE said, no man was more con versant with the det ills of the Army Estimates than the' Hon. Member for Montrose. The only difference in the estimates of this year, as compared with preceding years, would consist in some items of diminished expenditure, and probably a reduction in the amount of force. Under such circumstances, if the estimates were p►aced in the hands of the Hon. Member to-morrow evenng, Le would have the whole of Thursday and Friday to consider them. He hoped this would not be inconsistent with entering into the subject in Committee of Supply on Friday even ing, particularly as the Committee had already been de layed a few days by impedimenta which prevented the in troduction of the estimates so soon as he had expected. After a few words front Mr. MABERLT, complaining of the estimates being pressed upon the blouse in a manner that must prevent their perfect examination, The papers were ordered to lie printed. COAL DUTIES. Mr. E. WODEHOUSE gave notice of hi% intention to present a petition from Norwich to-morrow evening, on the subject of the duties of sea-borne coals. SUB-LETTING ACT. Lord LEVESON GOWER moved, pursuant to uotiee, for leave to bring in a Bill to explain and amend the Act of the 7th Geo. IV., relative to the assignment and sub letting of lands and tenements in Ireland. The Noble Lord did not consider it any part of his duty to enter Into a discussion of the merits of the subject on the present oc casion. However, he could not too distinctly or empha tically announce that it was not his intention to promote or originate any infraction of the principle of the Bill, or suffer such a course to be taken as far as lie possessed the power of preventing it. The emendation which he should propose could be introduced without infraction upon the principle of the Bill, which he upheld. It was to re move doubts and misconstructions that his Bill was in tended. So much for that part of the measure which was designed to explain the present Act. It appeared to him that according to the construction of the Act injury might arise to the possessors of leasehold property in dwelling-houses in Ireland, and he elms's' introduce a clause to remedy that g rievance.—(Hear.) — The Noble Lord concluded by moving for leave to bring in a Bill fur the purporte before stated. Mr. WALLACE.—As he supposed that Hon. Mem s bers would have an opportunity of being heard in the Com mittee, should abstain fioin urging, on the present occa sion, the objections which he felt to this Act. He could not sit down without thanking the Noble Lord for the magnanimity he had displayed in coming forward to amend a law w hich was so great a favourite with the landlords of Ireland.—(Heor ) Mr. A. DAWSON thanked the Noble Lord for his proposed amendment of this Act ; but he thought it would he much better to get rid of the measure altogether. The Union would never be perfect and complete until the statute law of tic one country was the statute law of the other. Mr. O'CONNELL was extremely anxious that not one word should escape him which should have the effect of causing this Act to be considered as a party measure, as coining from that or from the oilier side of the House.— (Hear. )—lle believed the Act to lie in the last degree mis chievous. He hail it front good antho4ty that a large por tion of the 7,000 paupers in Dublin had been driven out of the country by the Sub-letting Act Thal the Act had ex cited very strong feeling in Ireland, was evident from the numerous petitions that had been presented against it, even at a time when the great and important question of Ca tholic Emancipation was pending. In his opinion the Noble Lord had not gone far enough. The Act ought to he repealed at once, and if there were any principle in it worth preserving, that principle ought to be embodied in a new Act. The lion. and Learned Member then stated se veral cases of great hardship, arising, he said, fro:n the re ' trospective clauses of the Act, and which had Linen within his own professional experience. The effect of the Act was to increase the pauper population of Ireland. He extremely regretted that the legal advisers of the Secretary for Ire land, and the Right Hon. Secretary for the Home Depart ment, who bad set the example of legal re orm in this country, had not thought it preferable to repeal the Act altogether, than to introduce another to amend and explain it. The evil of these explaining and amending acts was, that they increased litigation. He was out one of those who thought the middle-men injurious to Ireland. lie knew that many good families in Ireland had risen from this class by accumulation which enabled them, at last, to buy estates. He could name fifty instances of this fact. The middle-men mitigated the mischiefs of absenteeism, bat the Sub-letting Act was injurious to the poor, while it conferred power on the rich, and the proposed measure, he was afraid, would add to these mischiefs that.of increase of litigation. Mr. DOHERTY, the Solicitor-General for Ireland, would not follow the Hon. Member for Clare through all the details upon which he had touched, which he (Mr. Doherty) thought might be better discussed in the Com mittee, clause by clause. With respect to the general question, if the political life of the Hon. Member (Mr. O'Connell) had commenced on the first day of that Ses sion, he (Mr. Doherty) might perhaps have laboured under the mistake that it should be discussed usein its own merits, without reference to politics or party, as the lion. Member had expressed his desire it mi g h t be ; but when lie happened to know that it had been made the subject of agitation, and had been rendered a n o bj ec t o f dissatis faction in Ireland (though by no means to the extent stated by the Hon. Member), he could not bring altogether to subscribe to the sincerity of that Ron. and Learned Gentleman's declaration. ILfore proceeding farther, however, he had to state that he was not the legal adviser of the Secretary for Ireland at the time when this Act was passel. lie was the unworthy successor of one whose character ought to have been sufficient to protect this measure friun having been at least intended to produce the baneful effects attributed to it by the Hon. and L.arned Gentleman.—{Hear, hear, hear.)—The lL n. Atember seemed not to understand the policy or the hi,tory of Act. This Act had emanated from a Committee of the House of Commons, before which there wen: two o bjects prominent. One was the Catholic Question, the other that tlow before the House. In favour of the Catholic Relief Bill there was a preponderance of opinion, resulting front the evidence ; but there was nu difference of opinion at all as to the necessity of a Sub-letting Act.---( Hear.) — It was true that nothing could ba inure fair than for the Hon. Member for Clare to advocate the middlemen, but this was not the feeling of the Committee ; they thought that these middlemen iin:mveriAied the country by inter posing between tie landlord and the occupying tenant ; and the Act bad been first contemplated in consequence of a representation from the gently of Ireland. It had yen complained that the gentry had divided their land amongst a paupor truantry, They raid it wit.* nut tlicir fault. They declared that they had instructed their agents to take all measures to prevent such a subdivision, but in vain ; there was some defect in the law, which for ever prevented their success; there was a technical difficulty, and it was this—no matter how strictly you worded the covenant with the person you might select for your tenant, still, in consequence of the power of sub-letting, was there a mode of escape ; for though you might choose some iespectable man, and say to him, I can rely on your solvency, your in industry, and your honesty, and therefore I will entrust to you tins,.• 500 acres of land ; but I wish only far you— yet notwithstanding all this, the proprietor would, perhaps, find these 500 acres divided into as many parts; so that where be had left a flourishing tenantry, he would now only have a set of paupers. The Hon. Member had said he did not see the principle of the Act—it was this, that people should perform their contracts.—(Loud cries of Hear, hear.) It never was intended that the tenant should be the only person upon the land ; neither as a legal man would he pretend to say (much as he thought of the able Secretary's talents) that he had constructed a perfect statute. No; but then the Noble Lord was willing to re ceive all suggestions for its amendment in the Committee. It was very true this Act was liked by the landlords, be cause it compelled the tenant to observe his contract; it was evident the proprietor ought to have absolute power and controul aver his own property, and was not bound to enter into agreement with anybody but him he chose. He also contended, that the measure was not contrary to the interests of the peasantry. A great part of the tenantry of Ireland, it was well known, were worse off than the beast that browsed upon the land ; it was therefore high time to make an effort to ameliorate their condition ; and this Act had keen brought forward with the view of rais ing the peasantry in the scale of civilization, and render ing them beings with whom there might be that degree of communication and interchange of kindness, without which there could be no permanent bond of union between landlord and tenaut.—(Hear. )—lt was not, as tile lion. Member for Clare had represented it, the act of a haughty Aristocracy to exterminate the people. He felt himself almost called on by the situation he held, and certainly by the opportunity he possessed for forming a judgment on the subject, to bear his testimony to the excellent affects already produced by the Bill of last year. Ile would give, as the result of his observations, that the settlement of that question had done more for the advantage of Ireland than the most warm friend of Catholic Emancipation could have anticipated. It had done all the good that was hoped, and none of the ham that was apprehended. He trusted to God, that in the debates in that House, which ought to be temperate, nothing would pass there that might exasperate the people of lreland.—(Hear, hear.)— Little would avail if all was tranquil here, if topics of exasperation were used nearer the scene to which they applied. Lord ALTHORP gave his approbation to the principle of the measure, and he thought Mr. O'Connell had been improperly attacked, for he had stated his objections to the Bid in the most candid and temperate manner. Sir H. PARNELL wished to express his obligations to the Noble Lord who had introduced this measure, which he Wag sure would be productive of the greatest benefit to Ireland. The Hon. and Learned Member for Clare bad made a mistake in reLlard to the cause of the poverty and distress of Ireland, if he imagined that the almost infinite subdivision of land did not contribute to produce that povet ty. Sir F. I3URDETT said that as to the fact stated by the lion. and Learned Member for Clare, that the Sub-letting Act had tended to produce a larger portion of the pauper population of Dublin, he would not deny the statement of the Hon. and Learned Member; but it WAS the subdivi sion of land which had, in a great measure, created tl:at poverty. There was somethin in every country, but es pecially in such a country as Ireland, stronger than Ac's of invent, and that was the custom of the people. The Hon. and Learned Member must, on that subject, he better qualified than any other man to give the House in fwrmation, and to guide them in the attainment of their evident wish for the amelioration of Ireland. He was glad to hear from such an excellent and indisputable audio s itv as the Solicitor General for Ireland the salutary effects of the great measure of last Session, and he should indulge with that Hon. and Learned Member in hopes of the future increasing prosperity of that country. But when he heard these statements, and the statements of the same Hon. and Learned Member, as to the satisfactory falsifie aions of all the prophesies of the evils that measure would have pro duced, he cull not help asking whether the Alendler for Clare, snore than any other person in the kingdom, was not the man to whom the country was indebted for these advantages ? So that in referring to that Hon. Member, they ought not to go backward in his Meer to find cause of blame, and, le ist of all, to seek to - discover it in those expressions which the heats of discussion on that great question bad called forth. The present was not a party queseon, and he trusted it would out so be treated. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL thought that if ever there was an Act passed with the real desire to ameliorate the c mdition of the people, this was that Act ; and he could assure the Lion. and Learned Member for Cl,re that he would give all the assistance in his power in furtherance of such an object. Mr. O'CONNELL explained, and leave was then given to bring in the Bill. ECCLESIASTICAL CORPORATIONS IN IRELAND. Mr. STANLEY should make no observations on the Motion of which he had give notice, as the Noble Lord, the Secre'ary for Ireland, had told him there was no objec tion to it on the part of the Government. lie moved for leave to bring in a Bill to amen•! the Laws respecting the Leasing Powers of Bishops and Ecclesiastical Corporations in Irelanl—Leave grant-A. • rity es to make it hardly possible to doubt what they say, that for a considerable time it was the ob ject of the Allied Governments to restrict the New State of Greece to the Morea. When I heard this I was, indeed, surprised and disappointed (for I speak from the testimony of those who know the fact better than I do); such a limitation of territory would make it rather a place of refuge for free-. booters and pirates than one fit to contain the pro per elements of a State able to govern and direct itself. Much of that sorrow I felt at this informa tion was, indeed, removed by the copy of the Proto col, in which Arta and Volo were stated as the in tended boundaries of the New State on the North ; and I was the more pleased with this declaration, as Sir F. Adam, whose opinion on this subject is de serving of much consideration, had stated that the country within these boundaries would possess a good defensive frontier. But, after that Protocol was published, and after I had heard that opinion, I must confess it was with considerable apprehensions I heard that other arrangements were intended, and that Arta and Volo were not to be the boun daries of the new State. On that question I hope to obtain either the expression of the opinion of the House, or the declaration of the Right Honourable Gentleman. Besides this question of Arta anti Volo, there is another relating to .an opinion ex pressed in another place with respect to Candia. For my own pert I am not prepared to say that Candia is in such u situation that it is necessary to insist that it should be given up to Greece; but if it is true that there has bet n war there, and that the Greeks arc in possession of the greater part of that island, it is clear that you will hazard the tranquillity and settlement of Greece, unless you provide at the same time for the settle ment of Candia. There has been one assertion made which is essentially erroneous. It has been said, that so far from Candia having been in the possession of the Greeks at the time of the Treaty of July, 1827, it was not even in a state of insurrec tion, and that the insurrection which did arise was only in coesequence of the Treaty of the Allies; but I have been informed, and I have no hesitation to name the authority from whom I derived the infor mation—l say I have been informed by Sir E. Co drington, that when he arrived in the Mediterranean, Cape Buso was in the possession of the Greeks, and from that point they excited insurrection in Candia. With regard to Candia being directly comprehended ie the Treaty of 1827, I am not prepared to say that it was; but I know of no sufficient evidence to justify me in saying that it v, as not. The words used in the Treaty were, " the Islands of Greece." It was not stated what the islands were, nor was Candia actually named ; and perhaps I might go farther, and say that it was generally supposed that Candia was not included, but Samos was ; and that island, I believe, is not to be comprehended in the new State of Greece under the now proposed ar rangements. I wish to speak on one point more. The favourable opinion of Mr. Fox towards Turkey was alluded to by the Right Hon. Gent. on a form, r night, and the same opinion has likewise been men tioned elsewhere. It is trite that Mr. Fox, or those who acted with him (for I believe it was about the time of his last illness), did agree with France in proposal to undertake the guarantee of Tut key, that neither France on the one hand, nor Russia on the other, should invade that country ; but those who rely on that fact ought to recollect the circumstances of that time, when aggressions to an enormous amount had been made by France, which had before then made an irruption into Egypt, and when it be came necessary, to preserve anything like a balance of power, to agree to the proposed guarantee. That was the only course that could then be adopted to prevent the recurrence of war; and when, there fore, it was proposed by France, it was the object of England to accept it, for it was, in fact, a gua rantee against France, that neither that Empire nor Russia should be allowed to disturb the hal:time of power as it was then proposed to be adjusted. But in 1791, when Russia invaded Turkey, Mi. Fox uttered that speech, the words of which may not have been correctly given, but the uni• ' form tenor of it can hardly be mistaken—in which he said that lie was not afraid of the aggressions of Rus sia on Turkey, in which there is riot one monosyl lable against the seizure of the Crimea by Russia, but in which there is the statement of his opinions that Russia has that power with which of all others, hardly accepting Holland itself, it is our interest to form political tics. Such, Sir, was the opinion of Mr. Fox, expressed under circumstances much more similar to those at present existing than those of the year 1806, when the whole state and balance of power in Europe had been overturned. I cannot conclude without expressing my satisfaction that the time is approaching when the objects of the Treaty of July are about to be accomplished. I feel the greatest sati-fiction that another State is about to I be added to the family of European nations, and that that people who for centuries have been afflicted with the calamities, and debased by the vices of slavery, will now take their chance of improvement from the free communication of the knowledge and the arts of other countries. Into the feelings of those who seem to think the pacification of Europe a misfortune, I confess I cannot enter. I have nothing in common with them. I know that in 1790, the Earl of Liverpool made a speech which gained for him a high character within these walls, in which he recommended England to support Turkey as a counterpoise to Austria : all I will say upon that point is, that how fatal, or at least how dangerous, are such speculations, such theories, and such wire-drawn refinements, on the preservation of the balance of power, has been established by our own experience. Sup posing them, however, to be well-founded when we look to the advantages gained for Mol davia, Wallachia, Servia, and last of all, for Greece; when we witness the attainment of freedom from thraldom, and the prospect of increased commerce, and increased knowledge from communication be tween that country and rest of Europe, we cannot regret that that balance had been disturbed. Put ting those political refinements out of sight, it can not be said that England, as a free and commercial country, will not have gained by the late establish ment of peace in the East of Europe. To those who do not participate in these opinions, I will say that I never will consent to be classed with those who think that' the - improvement of mankind in any part of the globe, and in any manner, can be hostile to the interests of Great Britain— " Dii meliora piis, erroremque hostibus ilium." I have now only to conclude by reading my mo tion That this House learns with satisfaction, that his .GREECE. Lord JOHN RUSSELL said—ln rising to bring forward the question of which I have given notice, I beg leave to state, that in proposing it my object has been rather to obtain a declaration from the Right Hen. Gentleman opposite than to enter on any hostile discussion of this subject. The events that have recently passed, and the explanations lately given in another place by the Ministers of the Crown, have tended a good deal to meet the views I had in bringing forward the motion. lam very glad that, by what has already taken place, I am re lieved from the necessity of founding this motion on the history of the late war between Russia and Turkey, for I feel how difficult it would have been to undertake such a discussion without having access to those papers which his Majesty's Government alone"at present possess; but there are one or two points with regard to the settlement of Greece— which settlement must in a few days take place— . that call for some explanation. The first regards the form of the Government that is intended to be established in Greece. On this point there have been sinister rumours circulated with respect to the intention of the Allied Powers, who, it was said, had intended to introduce a deTotic Government into Greece. lam happy to say that these rumours have been dispelled by the declarations recently made by one of the Secretaries of State, and I hope that the Right Hon. Gentleman will have no ojec tiOn to renew that declaration, and will state that his Majesty's Government has no intention to in terfere to prevent the Greeks from governing them selves, according to their wishes and their wants. Such a declaration would gratify me exceedingly; for while, on the one hand, there is nothing more odious than the introduction, by such a nation as this, of a despotic Government into any country ; so, Majesty has recently concertedon the other hand, lam aware how difficult it is to for the with his Allies, measmes the pacification and final a Atlement of Greec^ ; and it adapt any Constitution to a people composed of a number of different classes of men, whose habit's trusts that his Majesty will be enabled , at a n earl y p eriod, to give such information as may explain the c ourse his and oiigin arc essentially different ; and I therefore Majesty has pursued in this important transaction. see Government lifieYto be in Greece, final settlement will be found to tecure to Greece terri iCeteucael,iteixecsetia:t " That it is the confident hope of this . "louse, ;hat such by consulting the feelings of the people who are to be rukd by it. At the same time, I feel as en adbecbieetis:lteacribololiisfsitieiatduf,reenferteceopduzotirtmttryo,fithat t m o e ry ot au , ffi ii c l ic h n e t fpotr.o,niadt:dona,vlittlieifefnuclel ; p a o n s t . l et t s ha to t t a l d ie op G t oe th et o n , - , 3° tl i t i c . al; Englishman, l ltifl:e.leeVrndaSonn:ai—taensllisi freedom—should t ir e ti p t e u o t p io !e n . s n which are suited to the wishes and wants of Mr. Secretary PEEL —Notwithstanding the pe culiar circumstances in which lan, placed, I trust principles on whch its Government is to be esta that I shall be enabled to give such general expla- Wished. There is another point of a more doubtful nations to the Noble Lord as may induce hint to be nature to which I will now allude. I mean the can state to the House, without fear of opposition, tke i question of the territory to be given to Greece. the House upon his motion. I say that lam of opinion opinion that it is not necessary to take the sense that as the question of Greece has been placed under peculiar circumstances, because the House will recollect t t h h e at T o b t r r o t n h e e fi l r i s s t l d i ay of the Session, in the by the Allied Potters—as it has been the object of a i i n est , y: on st it it;: rn , d it that . in con a treaty, and of hostile operations, in order to effect junction with his Allies, and N e at o i t n h e 1 the d the settlement of its Government, it is necessary Treaty of the 6th July, he was on the point i j ii . that that settlement should be such as is likely to oe ing a final arrangement for the pacification of Greece, and permanent and that the frontier to be iven to for the determination of its relations with the rest of Eu- Greece should be such as may enable her to g preserve rope ; and his Majesty was pleased to add, that all the papers connected with that arrangement, sufficient to ex herself in independence, without a prospect of the plain the course be had taken, should be laid before Par repetition of those evils which are stated in the liament at an early period. In my official capacity I ant, preamble to the t rea ty o f J u l y 1827. If that po int, of course, cogn iz ant of those papers ; and I cannot help obvious and necess a ry as i t is, were the declared i t : l f inking that nothin t g could be more inclnvedent than policy of the Government, I should hardly fee! it : ; ~timomeztotilsiseiop,relsvehniirbmze, moment to be drawn into an un necessary to make any motion on the subject y . i l nvolv . e that information of whicl y i ere low the lous! 1%11 be in possestsioa. Were I (but on this subject itself 1 have received informa• don front various pemiw a buck vcvdit and aucho- drawn into aura itdi4cUssaa, Ido not know how 1 mild avoid availiug myself of that iliformation, thus obtaining an advantage in debate which oti ere do not enjoy. I therefore trust that the object of the Noble Locd will be attained, although I do not enter into that discussion ; but if it should heresiter ;Ake, and if the Noble Lord should deem it necessary to take the sense of .the House, I hope that the forms of the Helm/ will not prevent my offering some further observation..-- (Hear, hear, hear.)—The Noble Lord avows that his main object is, if pe‘eible, to procure an explanation ‘4 l two points which he deems of pressing intportanre. -- • I. The nature of the institutions provided by the allied for the future govei omen! of Greene-2. The territorial limit sto be, ass'gned to the new State. On the first pei"e I apprehend 1 shall he en,bled to give complete satis'ae thm. I assure the Noble Leo!, that in the arrangements , the bases of which bays !men laid by the Allitee who are parties to the Treaty of the Gilt Jnly, although the Noble Lied seems to have heard rumours to the contrary, tio attempt has been nook to dictate despotic Monarchy to Greece.—(blear, hear.)—No provision is made in the arrangements which can controul the establishment of such institutions as may he conipetib e with the presoit situation of Greece. I ran also venture to discleina, err tainly on the part of my own country, and I believe ea the part of Frat.ce and Russia, any wish to interfere with the formation of such institutions as are best calculated to secure the liberty and promote the happiness of Greece. --Clieers.)—lnto the second point, which relates to the limits of the new State, I can scarcely enter without en infringement of the principle to which I referred at the commencement of my observations. On the 22d of March was issued a Protocol, to which the Noble Lord to ferret!, and which in some way or other obtained publicity in the Continental Journals, relating to the limits of Greece, and the Noble Lord has expressed his apprehensions:that rho boundaries now about to be assigned will be less than those mentioned in the Protocol. I feel that the present is not the ()erasion for entering into the details, but I can venture to snore the Noble Lord, that the arrangement now in pro gress fur the independence, happiness, and security of , Greece is, in toy opinion, much more favourable than that • which was contemplated in the Protocol.--(Hear.) The territorial limits mty he less extensive, but the compensa tion for the more confined limits will, I think, he found ample. The Noble Lord justly observes, that it must be the policy of those countries which entered Into the Treaty of 6th July, to give Greece such security as in her infancy will protect her from foreign interference: he, therefore, wishes that she shall have a frontier capable of being easily defended. It may be sufficient for me to as sure the Noble Lord that there is no such limitation of the new St tte as he appears to believe is contemplated-- ' that the boundaries will he far more extensive than the Morea—(Hear, hear)—and that it will include all those places with which our historical recollections are grate.- fully associated, and that the nature of the frontier will in a considerable degree afford the means of defence. But the question of limits is of much less importance, pre.- yided those States which entered into the Treaty of the 6111 July have completed that arrangement, which we hope will be a fulfilment of that engegement—provided also, that those States, under whose fostering care this not Government is to be established, feel that interest in its prosperity which will induce them, until its resources are of themselves sufficient, to undertake the guarantee of its independence.—( fI. ar, hear.) With regard to the anxiety of this country to support the Government of Turkey, i t would be recollected by the Noble Lord, that on a former occasion some sarcastic remarks had been made upon the supposed attachment of Ministers to Turkish institcs tious—as if, because they did not wish for the dismal' bertnent of the Ottoman Power, they necessarily admired its institutions. At that time I protested against set such interference and I added, that I thought , could prove, by the opinions of Statesmen se re egll attached to liberty and liberal institutions, that it was penis' sible to entertain a desire to preserve th e i n te gr ity 0 , Turkey without the implication that it was fit to support its system of internal Governmerit. The Noble Lord 10 • 4 spoken of the opinion entertained by Mr Fox in 1791, bu t t . 1 in 1806 the cireumetancee of Europe were certainly sue' I as to induce Mr. Fox to think th a t it w a s for the genef'l interest of Europa—for the sake of the preservation 0 , the tranquillity of the world, that the independence o ', ' Turkey should be secured. There was another proof of bring opinions :ingf forward. o , d. f Mr.tlh,eoxcooirirrstehs of i s t t h ib e je d c i t s , cu w as h i ich I ons w d it i h d 0 0 0: French Gavernment in 1806, a proposition was made V I Prince Talleyrand, that some compensation should he made to Sicily, by the establishment of a new State, On', sisting of Albania and the Mores. Mr. Fox protect ed against this proposed dismemberment of Turkey, contend' ing that it ought to be part of the policy of Great Britain, France, and Russia, to preserve the integrity _of the Turkish power. Mr. Fox, therefore, attached great iii' pertance to the maintenance of Turkey as an iudependertS . state ; but I hope that the mention of this topic will not tend to introduce discussion. I did not on a former ' der, mean to state Mr. Fox's views as to the general system to European policy. I only wished to show by that instaneff that public men, in accordance with the example of thei r predecessors might attach importance to the preservatio n of the integrity of Turkey without necessarily inferrie% that they approved the system of internal Government in Turkey. It the Noble Lord had brought forsvard .k,'' motion in a hostile manner ; if- he himself , had not 100 that he rather int reduced it jn order to procure from Ali' could ni.te give rssuchz con a s n iste a n n t s i-c e , r vit a li n t d he s i u r ch duty infu ; rm an a d t informat ion I thought a he meant to press it to a division, I should feel under SO necessity of at once opposing it ; but considering th e promise of the Crown at the earliest period to afford ill' formation, I do not think there is any thing in the coin' plicated relations of this country with regard to. Greece , as they have existed during the last three years, to entit le h l ou t g b h el ; 1 this House so fir to withhold its confidence from the pre' sent servants of the Crown. and to undertake to expreee an opinion before it has obtained the information on whicb, an opinion ought to he founded.—(Hear, hear.)-- -1 beg the House to recollect that when the present Govern' insert (I mean tbeadminietration of the Duke of Welling' ton) came into office, they found the Treaty of the 6 511 July in existence ; the objects of that Treaty were nese° . airily vague and itnperfect, but the intention of it was v / apply an immediate remedy to an enormous evil affeetid the interest* of every commercial country. Although o f were not the authors of that Treaty, yet, throughout 0 1 whole progress of its execution, we were- as desiroris 1° fulfil its objects in the spirit of the Treaty as Mr. Cauniel himself. What were the facts? Shortly eter 'the aece sion of the Duke of Wellington to power, one of the parti# to the Treaty found herself, on grounds quite •extrittei c i involved in a aver with Turkey. Against the right e i , Russia to enter into that war we did not protest , b u t le" her to pursue the line of policy she deemed it right to tak°' It has been said that my Noble Friend at the head of time Cabinet, and the Government generally, were in some re: spects responsible for the precipitation and rashness irii P which Turkey commenced hostilities, and for the obstinad, with which she persevered in them ; it was also rontetele e that we were deceived as to the result, and thought thes Turkey could maintain a successful resistance. The me° charge against us however, ha:, been, that Turkey was i° some way improperly induced to place reliance on she friendship and good will of Great Britain,' partieula o7 after shelhad been termed in the Speech from the Thron e ' our " Ancient Ally," and that in consequence of that re' Hulce; the - wad lid - to embroil hersellin war. 'Now, simple reference to a few dates, without - entering into 07 argument; will totally disprove this charge: • I vindicel i not only the Government of the Duke of Wellington, be I that of Lord Goderich, from the imputation of- hall, tweeted an impression on the part of Turkey, thatshe inig',! rely upon the assistance of Engla n d, e ith er • directly or il' o ' directly. It so happens that the battle of Navarin ire fought on the 20th October, 1827, 'airl the actonntof ' reached Constantinople on the Ist November folkiwing The Ambassadors of the Allied Powers, and the Minister *."( Englentt as one of those Powers, in consequence o f the,' 1 total dissatisfaction with the assuran ces g i ven b y T ur kel' left Constantinople about tire 20th December, -1827. ,To key had, therefore, at that time, first, the proof that End land had taken her share in the battle of Navarin ; e next, the proof that Engl an d was di sp l ease d w ith 1 course she had taken by th e d e p arture o f h er A m baetrade from the capital. It w as on t h e very d a y th a t the Brit ) ", Aerbastador left Const a nti no pl e t h a t the Porte was infav e ated enough to issue that document, which is called, e Hat ti-scherriff, and which was the immedi a te cau se 9f: v r o s • war. It was issued on the 20th December, and i t de not until the 3d January that my Noble Friend was r i o t Prinw Minister. When he was so appointed,..it wse P r , known that the Hatti-scheriff had been published : by l u 0 key, nor did that fact transpi re un til a ft er s he had. he e l dt sign4ted in the King's Speech the "ancient ally? of ti ll country. These facts show that it was impossible that amid foolish reliance on the friendship and assistance of Englen w could have induced Turkey to enter into the war ,st Russia ; for that war Turkey is alone respon s ibl e , and l' her pars - verance..in ~ it she is al s o alone responsible ; both cases she acted not only without the eneotiregemeol but directly against the advice and remonstrances of Gro j Britain.—( Hear, hear. )--;-Still it way lie said; %het attboeF t she entered into that w ar .. upon the ectrosistenttion of 5 own case, mind wi t h out any inch, . reliance upon .pro Britain, still it sho u ld h ave b een the inellieY rt( ''' , ~ Government to i n t er f ere act i ve l y t prevent;the at _,, , trous issue of th e war. H ere 1 mus t say, al bat 4 beet/ laraly snide this babes gAglitati if imdr -.- of tv S 1