The Sun. — London, England, 1854-06-23 00:00:00

( / 4 t, d Y II Il f 7/77/z-c:/e---Z c 7/, i ;3 t; I * 11”101111111161111111 1 11111mo r--- 'fr _ • . , i i . • , • ' , , • ............. . r,s. .. ..... .. __ - ,-- :. , , ~,. / &"). . . ~ _ 30ine“ , his AY. • . , ~. • ......, ---. NITIONAL FESTIVAL, in. Celebratioti otthe-t'• I . i' 1 e m, ,, UNION between ENGLAND and FRANCE .- The LORD -? 1 M 42 0 R, Chairman.-The Committee for conductin g the proposed ; r•el ''',. 4 eeertainments and Festivities sit every morning , at the Mansion- (+ -, H ;27, at half-past 10 o'clock, where ,mescriptions and additional 0 - . 4 ' it S to the committee will be received, and every information . - "aritd. By order. _GEORGE SE DGWICK, Hon. Sec. e, . " VarA ''' 1' *---••-.________ - ._______ LONDON and NORTH-WESTERN RAIL- WA:Y.-To CO" TRACTOR-, and BUILDERS. T he Directors of the London and North-Western R a ilway Corn- ..a.same, .."--,..,--,-, . - r -....., -....,..--,,.-,-gmnowsismseicsar,,, ...".., ...n.riri.Acsai ire 117 are. desirous a remiatsinCAMDENß STATION' g TENDES for the LIECU i lON of VIT IONAL WORKS . ee:lles desirous of tendering are req u est ed to attend at the En- NO. 19 1 265.] ers Office, Euston Station at 12 o'clock on MONDAY, July 3. taeDe a person to take out the quantities on their behalf ; and ... - mmicarmEwsuomnswearmacwa....arrammarena " erawings and specifications may be seen on the same day. teT eliders -- addressed to the Sect" tart', at this office, to be sent in NEW SCOTTISH STORY- BY THE AUTHOR OF "MARGARET er before Monday, July 10, at 10 o'clock. . MAITLAND." . 31 / By order. CHAS. E. STEWART, Secretary. ' Now ready at all the Libraries, in 3 vols., '1 Euston StatloneJune 19, 1854. MAGDALEN HEP.B.URN• E 2 ~.. - ---------- ----- By the- auteor of " Margaret Maitland." i t LONDON & NORTH - WESTER N RAILWAY. Hurst and illackett. Publishers, successors to Henry Colhurn, 13, To CONTRACTORS and BUILDERS. Great Marlborough•street. Orders received at all the Libraries: e t T e ne Directors of the London and Nortlf-Western - Railway Com, _ eeare de.irous of receiving TENDERS for the ERECTION of BRITISH - AND 'NEU ORAL COMMERCE. .. . e„DITIONAL WORKSHOPS and- SHEDS at WOLVERTON Thi. day is publish, di in one Yoleme, 12m0., price Sc., cleth beards, . '"aTleee. if 5 P ,rties deeirouS of tendering are requested to attend ,at the En rr HE RIGHTS of BRITISH and. NEUTRAL ! I,; ( !winee,.Eusto i Station, at 12 o'clock on 'TUESDAY, the 27th' 1 - COMMERCE, as affected by recent Royal Declarations and ( Orders in Council. I s e , to appoint a person to take out the qualtities on their b.-half, -- se the drawings and specifications may be seen on . the, same day. • By JOHN HOSACK, • 1 . r enders, addre,sed to the -ecretary, at this office, to be sent in on Of the Middle Temple, Barrister•at-Law. . 1 - 'before Wednesday, July 12, at 10 o'clock.-By order, S. Sweet, 1, Chancery-lane, London. I CHAS. E. Se EIVART, Sec. • E uston Station,•June 19, 1854. NERVOUS AFFECTIONS. „ • a....... . • Just published, price 25., post-ft ee 2s. 6d., LONDON ~_ mrI)I.A.ND R t ILWAYA.-EXCURSIONS to the SEASIDE. Nature and Treatment, with an exposition of the Frauds that ii,' L l e e Public are* informed that, until further notice, FAMILY are„ra by persons who advertise the speedy, safe, and effectual . . I e .,Ii.ETS will be issued from I.ondon to H.WROWGATE.• SCAR, curof Nervous Derangement. 1 ItdITGH, WHITBY, FILET, or BRIDIANGTON, and Back, to By a MEMBER of the ROYAL COLLEGE of PHYSICIANS, London e "'ties of not less than Four Persons; thus - affording ,fitiniii-e en Londone Aylott and Co., 8, Paternoster-row. dar er] of .vistithig these watering places at the following Re- . ee d Fares (for each passenger), with the option of returning, to -9f 30 fiber , , • .or singly, on any day, not exceeding twenty-eight days from On Saturday, July ist, will be published, price 2d ,Nol of ' date of issue, by any through train except the express :- rrHE EPITOMIST, a Weekly Journal of Lite / Easton Station, London, tie , : i e 1 rature, Criticism, Art, Science, and Maeuractives ; c rn _....----- 84,,,., Ist Class. N Class. prising Fiction of ti.e , highest class, Reviews of new weiks,.all the 6, - elvgae and Back, for each Passenger.. •... 401 Od - 30s Od scientific Intelligence of the Week, a list of Patents with a streets . jeerborough and B -ck, for each Passenger •• • 50a Od 35e Od of Specifications, a , Domestic _Miscellany, and Correspoedence ; nee • • ei t 9 and Bee, for each Passenger• •.. • • .... 501- Od • 35s Od / 32 pages, Bvo. e;l'.ani' Back, for-each Passenger ••• • •• ... -43 s Oil -32 s 6,1 Office, 49, King William-street (City), London. ' a ?lagton and flack, fofeach Passenger.: .... 40s Od - 3esiOd Order of all Bojesellers, and Newsvendors, in the Kingdom. Thesel icket' are-not transferable. qelleral Manager's Office, June 14, 1854. By Order. CRY:TeL PAL ACE, 1854. e...... e , . Now ready, • T I RE MAIL STEAM-SHIP for AUSTRALIA, T HE OFFICIAL GUIDE and HANDBOOKS, illustrative of the CONTENTS of the EXHIB VI lON. sot 4, ;854.-The maga fic•rt screw steam gr p ' AL- To be had at the Palace and at all Booksellers ant Railway Sta- , 4, FA," ,0 tons, Captain J. GOODALL,. another •iefe the -fine fleet . ti , on., and of Bradbury andPrlntees and Publishers ,to the ii '"".ing toghe General ecrew Steam Shippim Compeety, wilF be -es Crystal P .:] ice CoMpeny, 11, Bauverie•street , g y‘ Paiebed with her Mejes - Y'- Malls for Adel-dde, Port -Philip, and 1 1 , 1 ,5 4 Y, on the 4th August next. This flee vessel has maictain , d . 14 1 tugh reputstiori for rapid s stng ant punctuality, and is a sister "ENGLAND EXPECTS -EVERY MAN - TO Ito 1113 DUT', - .'' ke r _ t o t'.e " Argo," which has, made the quieSesav laire to and from • THE NATIONAL PICTURE, by CLARKSON . e walla up to this time. The Calcutta has been employe 1 carrying . - STANFIELD. Esq., of " The Victory, with the Body of Nelson N e e. M . ails to and from England and Calcutta, and from her superior on board, towed into Gibraitar," is ON VIEW, daily, at the Gallen y i eee'ig - and steaming qualities, it may be fairly assumed that she will of Art, 23, teockspur•street, Charieg-cross -Admission free Abe the run in 60 d,ys. Rates of Passage mom 30 to 100 guineas. VA tZlvill be followed, on the 4.11 of October , by the ._ MEM, of 2,500 "On no occasion has Mr. Stanfield treated us with a more mami ficent disrlay of his prowess. - The picture possesses the merit, in & AZI; Full particulars as to Frei4ht and Passage Money at the Cora- separable from real excellence, of charming equally the connoiseur • •-''' a Offices, 4 Cannon - street , City. .... e. , and the crowd."-TiMes. , . 1 STEAM TO THE CAPE OF GOOD HOPE. COMMERCIAL. — A. - Gentleman of Enerky , 1 , te e In compliance with numerous applications from persons de- Integrity, and- Ability, wit sis at tome. In the North of Fel ee,,ne to proceed to the Cape of Good Hope, the Directors of the land, the North of Ireland, and •he South of Scotland. is just open to se', e ,ral Screw Steam Sbipping Compans have determined to de- au immediate engagement.--Apply, P. S., 7, Falcon -square, City. , egn their Steam ship " CAFE OF GOOD 1101 E '' . to TABLE li t - ,,,' ,on the 7th of July next. Thr " Cape of .iood Hope," 11. 10, • v ie? -s elie Commander, has just returned from a most successful TO NERVOUS SUFFERERS.—A RETIRED tourg, e to Constantinople with passengers and general cargo, is 700 CLERGYMAN having been restored to health in a few days, • e eurthen, and 100 horse-pow , r Bailt by Messrs. Mare & Co., , after many years of great nervous suffering: is anxious to make , 4 1 4 Ickwan, ad an earemelfast ship. Her accommations tor kno to others the means of cure. He will. therefore, send free, on ee, ° enters are n little if t at all y inferior to this Company's first-clase receiving a stamped envelope, properly addressed, a copy of the ;we pt ,1 1 ships so well known ost the Cape and Calcutta line. The rates acription used. . t i tttSSage money are,-e list Class, 60 and 655 Guineas erteh; Secaild Direct the Rev. E. Donglats, 18, Holland-street, Brixton, London. tt ril ' . 3 5 to 45 Guineas each. The ship will lad and sail from South . `O . ter , 11 . As her capacity for passengers and - freight is limited, early LNDON'LIFE ASSOCIATION. ~;•_ ~ ton should be • made to the Company's Offices, 27, Cannon 4ity. Instituted 1806. ' • -- _ Office, 81, KING WILLIAM-STREET. . . . r long terms PRESIDENT-CHARLES FRANKS, Esq. SMALL LEASEHOLDS, held fo VICE-PRESIDENT-JOHN BENJAMIN HEATH, Esq. • fe e _ at low . ground rents, to he peremptorily SOLD, pursuant to an This Society is essentially one of Mutual Assurance, in which 1 .0 Of the High Court of Chancery, made in fe certain cause of the Premiums of its Members are reduced after' seven years. te c z a _Thetis v. Williams," on TUESDAY, the 11th day of July, one The rate of reduction of the Premiums for the. present year is le e rand eight hundred and fifty-four, at Two o'clock in the after- -70 per sent., leaving less than end-third ofthe original Premium to te e '!.. ll l Two Lots,.atGeorge _ Tavern, Commerclal-road. near be paid. . k e `,?ladwen elation, London, by Messrs J. and R. KE sIP, the . The Society - also undertakes other descriptions of Assurance, in C u lls appdated for that purpose.- Several LEASEHOLD MES- which the Assured do not become Members, and having ceased to a, ieciES and DWELLING-HOUSES, numbered respectively 1,2, allow any commission - to Agents, the Society has been enabled to of - 'e 2 3, and 24, Nelson-street, Stepney, held for an unexpired term reduce the Premiums for this class of Assurances to the following te a r - two years, subject to a' ground rent of eighteen pounds per very low rates :- llifte• Producing . a yearly re n t al of seventy-five pounds sixteen Annual Tremlums for the Assurance of £lOO. ttat;' 4B- Printed particulars and conditions of s.-le may be had tors ' 0 'Messrs: Gregory, Faulkner, Gregory, and Skirrow, solici- Age £s.s. 11 Age Xs. d. Age' IXa. d. k g . : I, Bedford-row, Holborn; ofMr. J. J. !Mandy, solicitor, Read- 20 113 7 35 27 6 50 41 2 Oh L i :114,561.5. Ke.op, Judd•street, Branswick-square, Middlesex; 25 • 117 15 , Prem•ses, and at the place of sale. , 30 21 5 45 36 0 60 65 10 ' b aled theil7th day of June, 1854. ........___ . The Court of Directors are authorised by the Deed of Settlement . 'o advance money on the security of Policies in this Association. • • CONTRACT FOR IRON N tILS, &c. EDWARD DOCKER, Secretary. .-- • .Departinent of the Storekeeper General of the Navy, . Somerset-place, 23d June, 1854. pi. • Commissioners for Executing the Office of • NATIONAL LOAN FUND LIFE ASSUR ANCE SOCIETY, No ' 26; COrnhill, London. te a , Lord High Admiral of the United Kingdom of Great Britain . - he •lreland, DO HEREBY GIVE NOTICE, that on 'TIJE3DAY, - Established in 1838. . . • • ' imtEcTolts.. ' Vel... lB th July next, at: One' otiqck, they - will be - ready . to. treat kr;Such Persons as ma be willing to- Conti•act for. twelve ,A. Campbell Barclay, Esq. 1 . John Moss, Esq. lee. e th is certain, and afterwards until the expiration of six Months' Charles Bennett, Esq. Thomas Nicoll, Esq. eC u l e IL for'supplying her 3lajesty's several Dockyards with , , , ' Hugh Croft, Esq. ' E. S.'Symes; Ai D. • John Elllotson, If .D., F.R.S. 'J. Leander Starr, Esq. ' " I 't NAILS, TACKS, TENTER HOOKB, RIVETS, and BRAD 4. Thos. Colley rattan, Esq - -Clement Tabor, Esq. s l 'att .Ite, erns may be seen, and a schedule form of the tender and con- . ,• • ,Joseph Thompson, gsq. h e , ll s of the contract obtained, at the said office. -No tender will be • - ee:ieed after one o'clock on the day of treaty, nor will any be noticed MANAGINO DritECTORS. • • J. Leander Starr, Esq. (General). I Chas. Bennett, Esq. (Financial). Ine s the party attends, or an agent for him duly authorised in writ . , AIIDIToRS. - - et n e rf tender must be addressed to the Secretary of the Admiralty, _Professor Wheatstone, F.R.S., and Professor john Radford Young: be ef - eat' in the left-hand corner the words " Tender for Nails," and • . : MEDICAL EXAMINERS. - , X i lib" aso be . delivered at Somerset - pace, accompanied by a letter J. Elliotson, M.D., F.R. S., 37, Conduit-street. • • :he e d by two responsible persons, swaging to become bound; with • E. S. gymes , M.D., 33, Davies-street, Berkeley-square. relerson tendering, in the sum of 2,000/,, for the due performance I ' ACTUARY. ... _, contract. ' 'W. ILE. Woollionse, Neil , F.R.A,S., T.S.S., foe. . , ASSISTANT ACTUARY. . . . . . . • . . . .. NEW DISCOVERY IN TEETH. . • - Barker IV sae:house, Esq. I‘llt. HOWARD, SURGEON-DENTIST, • 52, BANKERS. , 3 b t ,, .... FLEET-STREET, has introduced an EN riLIELY NEW Messre.clyn, Mills, and Co., 56, Lombard street. , lee: - uIPTION of ARTIFICIAL TEETH, fixed -without springs, SOLICITOR. i ty '` ,, or :Natures. They so perfectly resemble the natural teeth. C. Ewens, Esq , 61, Moorgate-street. ti no t to he distinguished from the or ginals by the closest observer e • Total n umber of Policies granted froen December, 1852, to k 4 7. WM never change colour or decay, awl, will he found superior to , De-embee 1853,1,194 t r e e ,teeth ever- before used. This method does not requee the ex-- Under the following heads • are briefly tnumerated the leading le,„ 1 2 0 , 1 1 of roots, or any painful operation, and will suppmt ant pre- pre., ciples of this •zodietv : - at 44 ~ teeth that are loose, and Is guaranteed to restore articulation OBJECTS OF THE SOCIETY. le ei lastication. Decayed teeth rendered sound and useful in mas- . I. A Life Assurance may be effected eithe r b y One Payment, or by an U 11 1 ,411 Premium. • 52, FLEET-STREET. - At home from Ten till Five. 2. Policies may be effec ted WITH or without the privilege of e..... e‘ oat this privilege, the rates are lower. • B ARON LIN_IBIG on ALLSOPP'S PALE 3, A Life A•suratice may he effected on the life of another, on te, ALE.-" I am myself an ad mirer of this beverage,- and my Jout Lives or Survivorshi Def p erred, or Contingent , w ill be .. , the exPerience enables me to recommend it , in a ccordance with 4. Annuities, Immedisee, ftle -Dui on of the most emlAiik•Eriglish physicians,es a very agree- granted; also Endowments :for Children. le:arid efficient tonic, and as a general beverag e,. both fur the ' 5. Naval and Military Men , not in active foreign service, as `!id and the robust.-Giessen. May ii. - sure i without extra char g e, and allowed to.go abroad with ,eieLsope'S PA LE ALE ONLY is BOTTLED by PARKER and out forfeitu r e of Polic y , on p ayment of an extra Premium, 4 1 ' s e ING, Beer Merchants, s*, PALL-MALL. accor din g to climate. (f e 'ERIAL MEASURE. - Quarts, Bs.; Pints, 55.; Half-plnts In the event of the Assure , ) (w hen on the Withdrawal System) luncheon),ti 3s. per dozen, Also in Casks of 16 gallons and not le (miring to continue the Policy, on its surrender one-half the 'wards, annual payments will ho - returned by way of pu r c hase of his interest a... se. • 'therein. By this m an., apprehension of great pecuniary loss end 11 • RIESEMiI4- protected by ' Royal Letters doubt as to the intrinsic transferable value of each Policy is r.- imove.l. its cash value bent fixed_ end determined assnsbeforend by the Pe, Patent Par Mierland, and neared. by the Seals of the Ecole de !Soc .. tete at one-half the annual premlutris Paid thereon.: class " tn iaeie de is, and the Imperial College ,f Medicine, Vienna. iot si ciety will thereby be admitted ; and ever; indivi oat, se bile 11 a r TRIESEMAR; No. I, • . steadily pursuin - r orte object - a provision fee his family at death - will have, by the plan of that society, a door open to his savings, Se remedy for Relaxation, Spermatorrheeit, and Exhaustion of the st en. which will never be closed against his welds or his use. ..-------.'• Prospectusee•Report of last Annual Meeting, Forms of Proposals eie e , TRIESEMAR, No. 2, for: Assurance, and every desorption °tele essary Blank Forms, ss ith ._------ tr ktii v allY, in the short space of three days, completely and entirely Tables of Rates, and full information on all points, furnished, on sp ine, tales all traces of those Disorders which Capivi and Cnbebs ° r ye S° long been' thought an antidote for, to the ruin of the health plication at 26, Cornhill, or at any of, the Company's Agencies. " vast pordon of the population. • . - I, te TRIESEMAR; No. 3, a R . AVESEN D STA It 4, f ; , great Cont'nental Remedy - for that class of Disorders, which 4i: 4111 /lately the English physician treats with Mercury, to the ‘•••"‘., . PACKETS. No other Packets call at the Greenhithe, and Turfleet Piers. te r lble.destruction,of the patient's -constitution, and which all the , The Packets call at the Piers as underlined (weather permitting) 4,oarilla in the world cannot remove. FROM TERRACE PIER, GRAVESEN D. teCIESEMAR, No. 1,2, and 3, are alike devoid of teem or smell, ae e ef all nauseating qualities. They may lie on the toilet table a .., i , 'WEEK DAYS .SUNDAYS. 1 71014 their use being suspected. Mate in tin cases at I ls. each, free by post, 2s. extra, divided into ss .„ • doses, as administered ,by ,Valper o , nd L o a n ll o e t nit o n b d e , rt Rona, jo. Terrace . •ii t, , Time . z 4 i i .y . toe' .'r e e• - -To be had Wholesale and Retail in_. g P-- -1 8 is o i „ _' s , Cornhill - -Hannay and Co., 6'3, Oxford-street; and Sanger, Pier ','' 8 z A 8 4 al ''.' rz .... . vX•ford-street i . --- - —. -- --•-•-_________.::------ ---7--- - - - - - --•- -- - 1514 . TUX SI CRIET CAUSES OF SEL F-AC Q UIRED MISEItIES *tB 9 - 8* _ll* - - - AND DISAPPOINTED HOPES. -.- • 11* - - tli - - - THE SILENT FRIEND. 1* - - - - 3* _ _ , In Six Languages - Fiftiet h E diepa. 36 - be e Corr/mune THE REMEDY FOB Pas verrtow OF DISEASI,, 5 - - - 6 - - - ''' 4 trated by One Hundred Anatomical Coloured Engravings and 6* - - - - 8 - - a Cases. 7* - - - - -- - In Six Languages—Fiftieth Edieca. lo„_ Co/runtime' THE REMEDY FOIL P a gverrrow or DisEASII ,, - "ltrated by One Hundred Anatomical Coloured Engravings and ItCases. . enlarged to 200 pages, price 2s. 6d., by pest, from the .Edition,Pr_ E ;tablishment, 3 2 . 6 d. in stamps, E SILENT FRIEND, a tiMedical Work on e, the exhaustl, m and physical decay of the system, produced by hi; t 7esive indulgence', the consequenc es of infection, or the abuse of hz lo*,,,, eu r3r, with directions for t he nse of the preventive lotion, .fol t4 hy observations on Marriage, and the disqualifications which it. Illustrat id by 100 Coloured Engravings. By R. and L. ttrZIRY and Co , asu lti n g Surgeons, 19, Berners -street, Oxford poZcti London. CO.,i nbli shed by Sherwood and Co. 23, Paternoster ed-Z. and sold by Hannay , 63, and Sang er, 150, Oxford-street; reet ;- 95, on, F a rringdop-sreet ; ;Batton, 10, Church.,yard; Be tier , 4, Cheapside ;it Johns 68, Cornhill. idtT-I, treat iof the anatomy and physiology of the reproductive ns, and is illustrated by 28 Coloured Engravings. 4,; . taT 11. treats of the . consequences resulting from excessive in t—'`,,,,„_,nee, and their far aentab l e effects on the system, producing te„ — "Al and bodily weakness, nervous excitement, and generative V.lPacit. Illustrated by 10 Elanator) F.ravings. th Aar I y II. treats of the diseases xp resulting fro ng m infection, either in tC,Primary or secondary' form, and ntains explicit directions for r treatment. This section is illustrated by 62 1 t Engrav -I.et PAR T .V. contains a imedy for the Prevention of Disease by a '„,P le application, by which the danger of infection is obviated. T i [2tier V. is devoted to the consideration of marriage and-its duties. Iti ,, causes of unproductive - union are also considered, and the whole "Jeet critically and Dialcoopilically inquired into. f h LIM CORDIAL BAL OF , r SYRI %CUM is exclusively employed eating nervous and se rue debility, impotence, 823., I Is. and 338. bottle. The Concentrated Detersive F.sseness, an anti-syphilitic it; TI .,,, e( IY, for purifying tt ce b lood in cases of infection, secondary Ptons, -eruptions, and 'the abu se of mercury, I Is. and 335. per C" ttle. Perry's Pqrifyir g Specific Pi lls, 2s, 4s. 64.. and I Is. ;, e, gonorrhoea, gleet, stricture , and Ill o niclnflammationof the bladder. Consultation fee, if by letter, A minute detail of ti.re case is required : a g e, h habits, and posi 2ti society. Plc': rts, with advice, to be had at the Establish rat only, b y w hich the fee, is saved. Messrs. Perr y , Surgeons, q r „ e attemiance, daily', at 19, Berners - stree t, Oxford-street, [An t', from glinien Iwo. and Five to Eight: on Sunday from `"en to . , One. Direct Trains from the Boats marked t • Omnibuses from Fenchurcli , street Station to all parts of London every quarter of an hour. BRUNSWICK WtIAtIF. BLACKWALL, on the arrival of the fol lowing Trains from the Fenchurch-street Station. WSW( DAYS. SUNDAYS. -- --------- 77 ----, A a .g. .. Fen- -5 = LT, C. t Fen- t v . E church 1.1.,: E g ,14 , church 0: , c + F T; ,23 Street '4 d S - t" street 7 4 8 e . 8 fi ' -.......- - . -..-.. ...... 9 % -- -.- -8%. -- - 10% - _- 2% - - 12% 11% - - - - lO% -_ - - 1.1 -- - - 4% - % - _- -- _ f g ---2 % - s - *51 , 4 - 3)4 - - Oh - - - 5 - - 6% - - - - - Passages marked • are run direct. Fore Cabin. Saloon. _ 2un direct. Fore Cabin. 8, ro or from Gravesend and London.— •• ..•• 10d. .. 2d. Gravesend and Blackwall or Woolwich Bd. .. Os. tOd. Between Gravesend and Intermediate Piers.. 6d. .. Os. fid. BOAT TICKETS. —Twelve Months, 8 . Os. j Six Months, 31. Os.; Three Months, 21. Os.; to be had of the Collectors on board the Packets; or of Mr. Monk, Terrace Pier. Gravesend. Fast and superior Packets to be Let for 1. xeurslons. Apply to Mr. W. Morgan, Agent, Star C. , inpany, Star Office, Fcachurch stree i tTez i tib Terminus, Bl ac kwall Railway. June REPRESENTATION of the CITY of LON- . to be acpq(u)NitinTedl he with-itsr a res e c n o ondition n f n i. d h ei institute's, t i , ei t t o era h l e ly w e i x ii i i , n e g eted to take a share -n the _business of the Legislature, and anxious to ad vance the interests of the country and its colonies. But who have long represented the city, country, and colonies in their :Justness ‘n ittYntaroeogS terests and resources? -.-E.' Moses and Sox!- Who have studied their commerce and have erat'fled the wishes of all classes ? Who are always returned by overwhelming majorities ? E. MOSES and SoN. It is their only ambition to represent, in the mast efficient manner, the various stations in gocietr by the most suitable, artistic, and seasonable attire. To do that with the greateJt care, despatch, end economy, they have engaged in enterprises which hive no pa raPel. The taste and the claims .of the world's constituency they fully understand, and no amount of business wearies their energies, or relaxes their activity. ' Whatever t rofessions they make they are ready on all cccasions to fulfil. Their attire for the raimmer seison exhibits a very unusual degree of vai lay in matrritls, talent, design, and superiority of workmanship t and to order or ready made may be obtained at their City or West-end establishments, at the most economical prices. Dress for juveniles and young gentlemen coming home for the holi days is best obtained at E. MOSES and Sores. It has tie advantage of being more fashionable, comfortable, elegant, and durable than any offered elsewhere. Hosiery goods, the richest and most useful—Hats and Caps. the newest styles and most comairtable wear—Boots and Shoes, which cannot be equalled—may be procured at E. Mons and SON'S, at considerably lower charges than arc cuStomatily made. The largest 'wholesale Clotting. Shirt, and Boot and Shoe depart-' ment in the world is at the establishment of E. MOSES and Son. CAUTION. —E. MOSES and SON regret having to guard the agettnrt, imposition, havinz learned that the untra,desman-like faisch od of " Being connected with their Establishment," or It's 'the same concern, has been resorted to in many instances, ani, for obvious reasons, they beg to state that they have No CONNEXION WITH ANT OTHER HOUSE IN OE OUT OF LONDON, except their own Establishments, as follows : Lrndon City Establishment, 154, 155. 156, and 157, Minorles, 84, 85, and 85, Aldgate, opposite the Church, all communicating. Loudon West-end Branch, 506, 507, 505, New Oxford-street, 1,2, and 3, Hart-street, all cerumuicating. Bradford (Yorkshire) Branch, 19 and 20, Bridge-street, Sheffield Branch, 38, Fargate. Colonial Wholesale Branch, Melbourne, Australia. Merchant Tailors. Clothiers, Hatters, Hosiers, Furriers, Boot and Shoe Makers, ands. General Oatiltters for Ladies and Gentlemen. IMPORTANT.--Should any article not give satisfaction, it will be O if desired, or, if preferred, the money will be returned witbout hesitation. All goods are marked In plain figures. the lowest price, trona which no abatement can be made. The Establishments are closed from sunset' on Fridays to sunset en Saturdays, when business is resumed till 12 o'clock. A-new Book, with illustratiori9, entitled" The Echo, of Pablic Opi nion," containing full lists of prices; our System of self-measure ment. &c., &c., may be had on application, or post-free. s Id l'on pule Francais. Qui si paria Italian. Saes lqnicht man Deutsch. Aqua Kt babla Alms), TfiE I • • , SEr,'RETINFI:IPIITEI,pir YOUTH /kt•TD MATURITY. XTURITY. l ast published, price .2.1., idditiafed with cases ; free by post for 30 "xt,ktamr'l%; , lINTERVOITS DEBILITY; An Essay ou, BpermatorThcea. with Practical Observations on a safer and gp:e kuecesstul mode oftreatment of the diseases of the Generative it,,f tem. obtained by the use of the Microscope in detecting and , - unguisig by 'art nary exam ination, th , real cause and cffeet of 'er S' variety of cot.nplaint, whether arising from solitary habit, on e esses accident,, oT climate, followed by pracdcal remarks, founded l b , twenty years ' experience in the treatment of Impuissance, sae added Debility, Local Weakness, ‘ipermatorrhrea, 8;c. To which ea : aided, commentaries on the Physiology of Marriage, with pre a„7,tionary hln'a on the evils emanating from empirical practice, 6, - L i on the dang,erous remedies advocated by various writers on -4 .ie important disorders. By SAMUEL LA'MER.T. M. D. 37, BEDFORD-SQUARE, LONDON, u o M ctor off fdicine. Matriculated Member of the University of Edin i. nr. gh, iln , sorar?; Member of the London Hospital Medical Society, ' tcentlice of A, pothecaries' Hall, London, gse.. Sr-c -,.,_ne essential object of this treatise is to point out the fearful con ;i,enees resu'iting from ' certain habits, irregularities and excesses,, z ilch have 'produce& more misery in Youth, degradation in heed,Man and pr mature decay at all stages of Life, than, perhaps, any parer claw. of disease known to modern pathologists. Its perusal is tleularl, recommended to persons entertaining secret doubts of Vet" 13h3ral cal condition, and who are conscious of having hazarded hell* happiness, and privileges to which every human being is 1 .1„ t is absolutely necessary thata ll men should know, that there are 1 1 „,": . 4i1es of personal manage ment which cannot be violated without r ring grievous penalties, and when wisdom and regret succeed heyday of inconsiderate self-indulgence, how these penalties p. 44- be-mitigated, how the sting of their bitterness may be removed, t ., _ how um evil and its consequences may be avoided, and above all, ZAt there is f'earcely any degree of physical infirmity or functional Zarigement to which the timely aid of science cannot apply a cure. 4 'le Author has for a series of years been engaged in an extensive Lactice in 'he treatment of these delic ate complaints, which are ortunately teen too generally confided to the care of ignorant Lt_Wries, who in fl ict great injury on those who are induced to place retch ',heir pretensions. xtvtgier D.E.BILITY may be had, price 2s, of Messrs. Piper, uraothere andto., 23, Paternoster-row - Hannay, 63, Oxford-street; 1 ., a n. 39, Cornhill ; or free by post for thirty stamps, to any address tb.e Author's residence, 37, Bedford-square. At home for consultation daily Prom Aleven till Two, and from ti Ut Eights , e ,-- ~.. IC. A ' ~ , .4 . • , r ...........•••...... - . - - ..., ..,.... .. ~ ._.-......--...-..- ' L,.._ ,... 1ji ._,......_.. k1., .._, „..........._ ‘..1..i ....._ 1 ; ~,,, 9;,..., ':".”: *:,......' t."'Z..? 170 riiivTlLD .d r . .. . • . , r, \..,,, il ..---s-''''' .I:lll''7 ..fvtAttl:7 ‘ ,i,,4.,..7.,:44 1 .. ; :42 :- 1 7:14, .xt.t.. . 1 ~,,:t../ :: 7 1, 1 zi..4. : . . 4., / ../:. .f1'6 .:T e v.::.::) : :: : 'i7.:• 1 1: 1 ):., id 'i . ... 3 1A-7 1. , "---.... "kfir-- -( -4 e t .: -". - - - 7. A l b •Vrh' u tt : 1 ,, , erN . , , . . ~_ 4 4"...i0 '„ ~,,.. - - A' - ~-,_ - .- 1.. . ,-- : - ~ _. . ..- . ... , „ " 0. I . ~„. 4,-. , r,i.c. - - ---,..,. „....., 'r /''''''' \tsi ~. ./ I •_ -,, i' 1L.1 4 11i- le . ,4' ' ''-- -- -'' ----- IF--- --- 4 Y'- i'm ' " -7 x,' ~.i . ..,. ,' 4 . .4.4. . i tc: n e , s o - - 1... •.-- -- ...p.,2, ••: .- , ,-, . . '`,t '''.-..-• 1 v.... . 4 - ..„..... z c zt t,„:, ‘ . , ~,,,,..4..4 . 4.. _ oil , c., ._-_---, : ... ...„ s 4- . . x .. , - . . ~..,1 4 .. 4 p.- i t. t , ~ -_„,...0.., (~_ „,.,,,_.,...„,:.......:.,, ,„ .„^ .h . , : 1 .. , .f.„....,., ~..,,, , „..,„. •-• 5,- 'Nal. 1.1i._ , 4,, . o F.,z. ,- ~ . 4, ~..- • .1 _____ . :4 4 , • ~. f'' . c 1r . .,,,',' ' I ( ~. S -1 )',...,• t 1 0 i '`. \ 1 .... , •• t '''' r"r . ' -.•- . . %'*\, ' *t -. ' y , , -. , •• . ~, . .. , ! • \ '`.,',.... • ~4 I Jo, •.--.,,,,-...".." tz.v . ....... ~ ,'. --;.- * OA, ~ . ,0 11 ` . ...; •,';', , --- ).,. s,•• -',.. 4 7;' , ... —..-----... . , .\./' ' ' . . t •": 11,1 3%. , 4 .."' —•-='?".. l - tiri''' ' ' 3' '' 2" ~,..,. k t -- '.;,,. "SP ~,,,- 4041. bit 0 rt - di" ' s '.- ' '`. `%. I • • , . .. i . : •.: i 4,, , . -- -- , - .. - '1 0 .,.._`,11.-*. ,I,,p.es Di I,"t- - ' - ' •,,-,,: ‘,4 3 ' ••`' , ••• .. • 4 c.,,,-;,...i..-' •-'-'"--•-•.-,-- . • e . . . .•t c . *S-o. l ''' • . . i ' ~• .~ [PiticE SD, 101 l ' WA' 111 wit° re 01 , A ra Ed' rag' A ter 311), fsl l eet ice) ...... --- G, 1:?, LONDON, FRIDAY EVENING , JUN F. 23, 1854. 31 R. ALBERT S MITII'S MONT BLAN C, _lt including the BERNESE OBERLAND and the SI NIMON, THU.; EVENING, and Every Evening at Eight. o'Clock, (excel', Saturday) ; and Tuesday, Thursday , a nd Saturday Mornings, at Three. Stalls, 33. (which can be taken at the box. office every day from i tUI 4 ; area, 25.; gallery, I.e.—Egyptian Hall, Piccadilly. LAURENT'S CASI NO ARGYLE ROOMS, (Lessee, Cuss. C. LAURENT, Onslow-house, ):'ull; an-road), —The above itooma are now OPEN FOR THE SEASON. and will continue open every evening, with lALTRENT'S Cl BR D LEATE BAND. ConstanCnople Quadrille, Sultan Polka, Fair Star Waltz, and Overlan4 Mail - Gatopi by D'Albert ; a!so, by H. Lalrent , the following Waltzes La belle Frangaise, Leonora, Villi kills and his Dinah, Admission, is. Doors open at half-past S. Dancing to commence at 9 o'clock, and terminate at half-past 11. ROYAL POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTION. Under . the Patronage of 11.R.H. PRINCE ALBERT. The Pub is is respectfully informed that this Establishment is now placed UNDER ENTIRELY NEW NIA N , ,GEMENT. and that alterations and hnpruvem , nts are in progress in alt its departinent ,, , which It Is hoped will r,nder it even more worthy of the patronage of the public than it has hitherto been. All et mmunicationa in future should be addressed to J. 11. Pepper, Esq., the Resident Director. All the LECTURES, OPTICAL and other EXHIBITIONS, are continued as usual. Open daily from Eleven till Five, and every Evening except Satur day from Seven tid Ten. Admission,-18.; Schools and Children under ten 'years of age, Elaif-price. L. HYAM, 36, GRACECHURCR-STREET, CITY., Approach of Summer. THE approach , of Summer is indicated in a variety of ways- Busine>s assantes a new aspect, and act ve preparations are eve , ywhere made. L. HYAR'S New SUMMER STOCK will he found both novel and atr _awe. The most decal: d hurtrovement , have been made in Gentlemen's and Youths' Clothing, aril the tariff oi prices reduced to the lowest and most cousiStnt HE SUMMER DRESS and FROCK COATS .a at this Establ shnient are now ready. The three es,( widls —a good tit. 'good = r. tarta and lowest possible price—guaranteed A trial will ensure satisfaction. L. HYAIf, 36, GRACEMURCH-STREET, CITY. SUMMER OVER-COATS adapted for the race cour.e qr promenade, are prepared from the choicest mater al, and in the greatest variety. These beautiful garments so necessary in oar variable climate, are always on hand, varying* in price from 14s. to 425. An early inspection is requested. - L. HY A;4i, 36, CrIiACECIIURCII-STREET, CITY. /THE SUMMER TROWSERS and WAIST COAT:. br.itight out this Season are in such boundless variety and beattty that it is impossible to enumerate them. The public will do well to cal , and select from this leviathan stock where low ness of charge combined with durability Is insured. L. TIYAM, 35, GRACECHURCII-STREET, CITY. • UNEQUALLED BEAUTY IN CHILDREN ' S AND YOUTH ' S AT TIRE. N-OTHING can surpass the neatness and elegance of L. lIYA DEES'S for the YOUNG. The admiration of parents and guardians is constantly called forth by the excellence of these well fabricated articles tor juvenile adoption, all of which are supplied at unusually moderate prices. L. lIYAM, 3G, GRACECHURCH-STREET, CITY. THE BESPOKE OR ORDERED DEPARTMENT. THIS most important branch of L. Hyam's Establishment has been conducted with great success, and affords universal satisfaction. In this department the proprietor has kept four important points in view, viz., firm and fine fabric, faultless fit, fashion, and the lowest possible price. The profusion of novelties displayed, combining' every material that good taste can suggest, will elicit satisfaction and ensure orders. The savour of an early visit is earnestly requested. sity tests, and said that they had been abolished by the Long Parliament, but re-imposed by the Episcopalian Party at the Restoration, in a time of exasperation; in con sequence of their previous persecution. It was necessary . for civil and. religious liberty that they should be abolished. There was one party that sought to interpret the tests in a non-natural sense, and if that geode of interpretation were adopted, the test would be at once done away, but he expressed disapprobation of this method of being.rid of_ them. He thought that the University would derive bene fit. from this. measure, and that the nation ought to share in such benefit. Petitions signed by 37,000 persons" had, he said, been presented, this session, against the tests, and none in faiour of them. Mr. COLLIER supported the. clauses, on the ground that the system of university education ought to be a national one. He considered that the proposed clauses would infuse fresh vitality into the university. Mr. S. HERBERT would not, after the prolonged dis cussions which had taken' place upon this bill, enter into the question whether Dissenters were entitled to be ad mitted to the university, but would explain the course which Government intended to take. It was impossible to maintain the exclusive system which had hitherto pre vailed. Its maintenance, as regarded the interests of the Church of England , was neither politic nor justifiable. But the question was as to the best mode of effecting their object. The bill had not fared so well as he h.d hoped it would do, nor would • anxiety in regard , to' it end with its passing in th a t house. He was, therefore, the more opposed to the introduction of any additional matter calculated to imperil its sue cess, and he felt that such clauses as were new pro posed would much interfere with its chances. He also urged that, the power of legislating. for the University having been taken from the Hebdomadal Board and trans ferred to an entirely new governing _body, it would be_' most undesirable at the outtsetie show that Parliatnerft„was unwilling to leave to that body the.exercise of autho rity. There was a strong feeling in *the - University in favour of practiearreforin, andSitir neat, woad' be gained by the promoters of these clauses if the alteration proceeded from Oxford than if the -change - were forced upon them. Nor would these clauses of themselves admit Dissenters if the University were unwilling to receive them, as th authorities had it in their power to impose theological ex'. aminations and other restrictions even more distasteful than these tests. lie therefore opposed the clauses, not believing that they would advance the object in view. Mr. MILNER. GIBSON said that the arginient of Mr. Sidney Herbert had been advanced years ago in answer to the same demand. The house ought not to delegate powers which it was its duty to exercise, nor was it be coming the dignity of the house to decline carrying out its views of public policy because they might not be acceptable in the House of Lords. Let that house take the peril of throwing out the measure sent up to it. He appealed to Lord John Russell, after Isis speech of the preceding day, to say something that day in favour of Whig and Liberal principles ; and he - begged finst members of to Govern ment might be permitted to treat this as an op question without incurring the displeasure of their chiefs ; He argued that these tests were not part of the original con ititution of tho University, but were imposed for political purposes, and no reason existed for their maintenance. He desciibed-it as a solemn mockery to ask the consent of boys to a set of theological propositions which not even bishops could understand, and upon .which man were allowed to differ. ! Sir W. HE ATHCOTE, in opposing the clauses, said that they would notplace Oxford, as had been contended, on-the same footing as Cambridge and Dublin. He denied that it-would be possible to accommodate religious instruc tion to the tenets of various sects, as had been shown in the case of the London University; and characterised the proposed experiment as perilous.* -Sir J. RAMSDEN supported the motion, and argued that if it were of importance that Dissenters should be admitted to theseinvaluable schools, it was of still greater importance that the Church should not incur the reproach of intolerant exclusion. Mr. HENLEY pretested against the proposal, which tended to do away with all religious instruction at the University, and to reduce it to a mere establishment for the promotion of science and literature. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, though he did not concur with all that Mr. Henley had said, thought that there was force in what he had urged, especially as 'certain cheers seemed to intimate that these clauses were deemed by their promoters as part of a series of parliamen tary efforts to do away with religious instruction at the university. He should consider that, as the representative of Oxford, he was betraying a solemn trust if he gave ;assent to such a principle s He believed that, in regard to this question, they were bound to consider the bond fide interests of the Church of England. While that Church was a national institution the nation had a right to expect the teaching of the University to be of a religious cha racter, and moulded on the form of the religious in struction given by the Church. He stated explicitly that on the part of the Church .he entertained no apprehension from . the admission of Dissenters; but it, - war impossible to separate their case from that of the Roman Catholics, and in considering the former, it must in honesty be held to involve the case of the bet tar. He signified his concurrence with what Mr. Sidney Herbert had said, explaining that he bad not understood the:latter to give his adhesion to the terms of these clauses, but to say that, if due provision for the teaching of religion according to the Church of England could- be made in the "University, it would be a great ad vantage if the admission of Dissenters could also be pro vided for. He did n ot think that ho should be keeping faith with those who had assisted in passing this bill, - by introducing so essential a change at the last moment. The clauses invited a departure from the whole principle of the measure, which was one of emancipation. They could not accomplish the object of procuring admission for the Dissenters, which must depend only upon the good will and free will of the University ; and-by these alone could the difficulty be solved. It. would, moreover, be most un worthy of the house 'to pass a clause by which the dis senter might creep in, but which would exclude the Ro man Catholic. He also prAtested against any menace being held out to the University as to futuie Parliamen tary interference. Lord STANLEY said that the course Government had taken was precisely that which might have been expected, and which they hall adopted of late in regard to every question of principle, especially of religious principle—a course which fixed them to no broad principle whatever. The country would have reason to complain of another in stance of indefinite delay. He was by no means so certain that the bill would' not, in the form proposed, pass the House of Lords ; but Liberal members ought to be much indebted to that house, whose 'probable opposition was so often pleaded as a reason for not passing measures in that house. He was no advocate for interfering with the de tails of academical management; but this was one of those questions of national interest and importance with which, in fairness and in common sense, Parliament ought to deal. A resolution of the house would contain an indication of public opinion which the university would not venture to disregard. He disclaimed any unfriendly feeling towards Oxford • but his own vi ews u p o n this question were fixed and definite, and he hoped that the house would not shrink from a decision upon it. Mr. WIGRAM viewed the opinions of Lord Stanley in regard to several of our institutions with distrust, and expressed his own concurrence in the sentiments of Mr. Henley. Mr. LUCAS supported the clausei, and, on the part of the Roman Catholics, disclaimed any desire to take advan tage of the opening which it was suggested was to be made for them. He considered that the Chancellor of the Ex chequer had surrendered the whole case. Mr. W. J. FOX dilated upon the inutility of the pre sent system of oaths and subscriptions, and asked whether such was the way in which men should be prepared to fill leading positions in the country. Oxford, hs urg", ought to keep progress as well as conversatism in view. He de mended that the clauses should be granted as a homage to the right of private judgment. - Mr. ROUNDELL PALMER denied that the Univer.: sity could be termed a national institution in the sense in which the promoters of the clauses used the term, and urged that it was national because it had always followed the fortunes of the national church, and because the nation looked up to it with affection. It was an ecclesi astical institution, supported by ecclesiastical endowments, made for ecclesiastical purposes. He resisted the clauses, as the first step:of a revolution which the promoters of the clauses avowed, manfully, that 'they contemplated, but which the son of the Chancellor of .Oxford, though sup- porting the proposition, shrank from. He asserted that all the Dissenters would refuse to acquiesce in a state of things which must either withhold religious instruction, or tend to detach their children from th ei r own denomi nation. Lord RUSSELL—As the opinions of the hon. and learned gentleman ivho ha's just sat down a re so ver y dif .. ferent from.those which I entertain, although we may pro 7 bably be found in the same lobby when we come to divide, I am anxious to distinguish my opinions from those which he has just delivered. to .the house. There are as it ap pears to me, two questions involv ed in the p resent debate —one is as to the admission of Dissenters to the Univers- - ity of Oxford, considei ed as a measure fit to be adopted ; the other is, whether, there being a bill before the house for the better government of the University of Oxford, it is desirable and expedient that Buell - admission, if it, is right, should be enacted by one or many of the clauses in teat bill. Now, these questions bei n g q uite distinct, I will endeavour to keep them so in the observations that I shall address to the house. With respect to the first ques tion, I own I cannot think that any argument which has been urged in this house to-night, or any which I have heard on former. Occasions, has any conclusive weight against the admission of Dissenters to the University of Oxford. Let us look first to that which has been so often referred to, the main designs of the founders. We must suppose the founders—those at least of them who founded colleges in Catholic: times, —to be in one of two conditions . —either we must suppose them to retain the faith and the opinions which they held during their lifetime, or we must suppose that, wishing that the colleges they founded should conform to the opinions of their days, they would be ready now to entertain the'views and opinions which are the pre sent opinions of our days. When the founders t, ere told what were the doctrines of the Church of England, and were afterwards told the differences between the Church of England and the Protestant DiSsenters, they would say the upon whirl .the Church-of England and the Pro- . testant Dissenters agreed were so -pregnant with impor tance that it was impossible they could assent to the pro position that one class should be admitted and another ex cluded.' They would consider that those who differed on ques tionß of transubstantiation, of the supremacy of the Pope, and upon other matter differed on questions so important and so affecting the foundation and root of their faith that they never could admit that persons belonging to the Church of England should be included in the benefits of the foundation. But if we go another way and suppose—and I think it a fair supposition to make: —that the founders would wish, if they, had the whole state of opinion before them, that the colleges and foundations should conform to the opinion of the present day—then, in that case; they would be dis posed to conform to the 'policy of the present day ; and that policy is in favour of admission and against monopoly of religion. (Hear, hear.) The hon. and learned gentle man who had just spoken said the University of Oxford ought to remain- connected with the Church of England, that it was so before the Reformation, that it had been so since, and that it ought to remain so now. Why, sir, with regard to the period since the Reformation, we • must consider that` the University of Oxford, like many other institutions, partook of that system exclusiveness--4t might be necessary exclusiveness — which considered the. Romah Catholics and. the Protes tant Dissenters enemies of the Church. If you refer to the arguments made at the - time of 'the corporation and 'test laws—those laws which :excluded Roman Catholics-- you will find that that- is at the bottom-of the objections to the admission of these two Classes, that they were con sidered unentitled to the benefit of the" institutions of the State, and that therefore they should not be admitted. (Hear.) But is any such opinion held now ? Is that the opinion of the present day ? On the contrary, in regard to all thesoffices of the State, with one or , two exceptionS, the Roman Catholics and the PrOtestant Dissenters . ,are generally-admitted to those offices. (Cheers.) And let U.S see how this applies to the University of Oxford. I think it will be genrally agreed that the doctrine of exclusion, the doctrine of monopoly, should not Ise carried further than is absolutely necessary. (Cheers.) Now, what _is it that is necessary in the University of Oxford ? I agree with the hon. and learned gentleman, that with respect to the offices in the church, with respect to bishops and to persons holding the cure of souls, it iss'absolutely necessary that those who hold such offices should be persons conforming to the standard of the - church to which they belong: (Hear.) But how much farther can we go in this direction ? I, think if we go so far as this, and say that the persons go- . yarning the colleges should be members of the Church of England, and should give religious instruction according to the standard of the Church of England, we should go.quite as Wats is necessary in that direction. (isheers4 I agree certainly that it is desirable that religious instruction should be given in the University of Oxford. If lam asked what religious instruction should be given, I must revert to opinions which I think were quoted by the hon. baronetthe member for the University Of Oiford, which opinions I held when the university college then called the University of London was . founded. It Was - founded ' for persons of differentreli,gious opinions. There was a proposal made ICy wine of those who• founded it that there should be lec tures given on general Christian_ topics, but that those lec tures should be so general and so vague that persons of all Christian denominations could attend them. It was my opinion that it was much better to have no religious in struction at all than to have a professor so qualified. (Hear, hear.) I therefore was one of those who, against the opinions of several persons I highly respected, objected to the institution of such professors, and I said it was better only to teach classics and sciences than to attempt to meddle with religion at all if we could not be a religious body. I quite agree that the religious 'instruction to be given at the University of Oxford should be religious in struction according to the Church of England. When I have said so Much I think I have said all to which the rule of exclusiveness should apply; but when I come to other questions —when I come to such a question as was argued by my noble friend near me, the member for Tiverton, in 18.31, when he asked if it was necessary that per eons should not receive a diploma in various professions unless they made a profession of faith according to a particular-church —I own it appears to me that regulations might easily be made (if they were willing to make them) by the authorities of the university and by the authorities of the colleges that those perions who belong to families, whether of Protestant Dissenters or Roman Catholics, should receive all that in struction in science? all that instruction in classics, and all that instruction in arts which persona belonging to the Church of England receive. (Hear.) Why, sir, this is, after all —I don't care whether it is a national institution or not —this is, after all, a great national object, that if you have a university with a revenue of 15d,0d0/. a-year,' and have connected`"with that. university men specially qualified to teach, men in the possession of great acquire mentst in science and learning, it is desirable as far as pos sible that the nation should parteke of the benefits of such an institution—(cheers) —and that you should not, by setting up a bar at the very entrance of the university, deprive a great ' portion of your people of those advan tages. (Cheers.) Take a man who is qualified to become a very-eminent lawyer, or a very skilful physician. Is_ it not a great evil and a great grievance that, because that man is the son of a Roman Catholic or a Protestant Dis senter, he should be thereby debarred from the advantages which such a university, holds out, and be unable to acquire that learning and skill which would enable him to practise his profeasion with success? (Loud cheers.) I ' oivn ' I cannot find that there is any reason whatever in the objections male by the hon. and learned gentleman who 'spoke list, and others, to adtnission, so far, to the benefits of the university. A young man certainly could not then have the benefit of instruction in the doctrines of the Church of England. At the same time there is some truth—though men in these days would hardly agree in such an opinion—there is some truth in the opinion more than once stilted by Dr. Johnson, that the differences ofChristians among themselvw, after all, are more political than religion B—that there haves been great political differenCes among Christian sects, but that the religious differences are not so important as they at first sight ap pear to be. That is the opinion of Dr. Johnson. It is impossible, I think, to subscribe wholly to that opinion, bat at the same time ibis quite obvious that political in fluences have greatly entered into religious differences. But, sir, with regard to the young men who would then be unable to receive the religious instruction of the Church of England, it is a matter for their parents and guardians, rather than for us; to Consider if their religious faith would be safe in the University' of Oxford. An hon. gentleman who has spoken to-night—the hon. number for Meath (Mr. Limas)—has said that if Roman Catholics were admitted to the University of Oxford, he does not think they would be disposal to take advantage of that admisSion. I have heard, with respect to Cambridge, where Protestant Dis senters are admitted, that some of those Protestants Dis senters find that, whether by following the custom of the college to which they belong, or through the facilities by which young men receive instruction, they afterwards conform to the Church of England. But that is a matter for the parents - and 'guardians of the young men them selves, What is the duty of the Stale, and what I think more peculiarly the duty of the university as a national institution, is to open the door, and whether these persons choose to enter or not is a matter entirely for 'their own consideration. Ido not deny that the general character of the University of Oxford would still remain Church of England, and therefore most of those who went there would go to an institution .of their own creed.. But, sir, with regard to the second resolution of my hon. friend, I must say I cannot see the policy or even the justice of the dis tinction which was taken by the noble lord the member for King's Lynn, when he said he agreed that Dissenters should enter the University of Oxford as students, but he would not allow theist to proceed to take degrees in the university. (" No, no !") Lord STANLEY—I said I thought it impossible to ad mit the Dissenters to hold office in the colleges, but I wished to admit them to all other privileges. - (Hear.) Lord J. RUSSELL—I am sorry that I misunderstood the noble lord. The second resolution is, that "it shall not be necessary for any person, upon taking any of the degrees in arts, law, or medicine, usually conferred by the said University of Oxford, to make or subscribe any decla ration, or to take any oath, save the oath of allegiance, or au equivalent declaration of allegiance, any law or statute to the' contrary notwithstanding." Of course the noble „lord did not object to, that resolution ; it appears to follow naturally and logically from the first. It would otherwise be saying, "I think it a great hardship to exclude Dissenter s from the university, and if I admit them I know their proficiency, and that they will outettip all competitors in learning." In such a case, to say they shall not proceed to take up degrees would be a much greater hardship than the present exclusion that exists. I would go so far as to say that, though they should not be admitted to the immediate governing ,body of the colleges, yet with respect to any fellowship which - does not immediately concern the govern; meat of the university, and with respect to any emolument which might enable them hereafter to pursue law or any other branch of study that would aid'their progress in life, there is no objection to the admission of DisSenters. (Hear, hear.) I think the line might be drawn there. The govern ing body of the university and the colleges should be com posed .of those who belong to the Church of England, but the exclusion and monopoly should not go beyond that. The hon. and -learned gentleman who last addressed the hotise, said that -Trinity College, Dublin, was not a case in point.. It is only not in point because the young men there do not reside in the college, but it is in point so far as you have - young men differing in religious faith from the uni versity studying there, and obtaining degrees in that uni versity'. {Hear, hear.) So far=and that seems to, me the greater portion of the cage —so far It is an example ex tremely in point. I have now said that I think the vsiniis-, sion of Dissenters _should be ooncefled, and tven pointed out the extent to which, in my opinion, it should be conceded. In former years I stated that I thought the questions. of the admission of. Dissenters, and the improvement of the governing body sled the studies of the University of Oxford were two totally distinct questions, and that it would be desirable to keep them so. I retain that opinion now. If my opinion were altered, I should certainly be at liberty so to declare it,„bnt I retain that opinion now. I think we have a bill-before us which tends very greatly to the improvement of the University of Oxford, which is not only a considerable reform in itself, but which is intended us the commencement of reforms to be carried into effect in this and succeeding Years. I can, however, understand the declaration which has been made to night by the right lion. gentleman the member fur Manchester.. He says, " Here is a bill that is of no value ; indeed, 'it would be rather better perhaps for the' improvement of Oxford that it should be thrown out, and another bill brought in." I take a different view of the question. I wish the bill, which improves the university system, to pass in its present shape. The measure as it stands keeps clear of the question whether Dissenters shall be admitted to the university at all—whether they should be admitted to all its benefits or to only a, portion of them. Besides, the boa member for North Lancashire admitted that the clauses he has now proposed would not effect his object, and that for that purpose it would be necessary to recommit the bill and propose other clauses in committee: I am sure the hon. member means nothing but what is perfectly fair, but I think it would have been doing only what was right and- respectful to the house,' if the hon. member had •exolained 'the machinery by which he expects to carry its object into effect. There can be no donbt that the success of the present motion • would delay the bill for another week, and that the mere effiux of time would endanger the passing of the measure. Besides, I think it very probable that the insertion of the clauses would insure the rejection of the bill on the second reading in the other house. ' The noble lord the member for King's Lynn holds this matter very cheaply ; he thinks we ought not to attend to it at all, and conceives it to be a reflec tion on. Our COllllB to refrain from enacting what W.O think politic and right ; yet I remember. some 20 years ago standing by another noble lord who proposed to t , s e t ee ilL out a clause a bill to which he attached impo_r hea laid the Church Temporalities (Ireland) Bill—althoigh ntroclucing great stress on the clause, and dilated on it the measure.l er the second that the retention of the clause would o g :U n d. therefore he . Why did he act thus ? Becau in se he thought. reading of the' bill in the other . h se, The noble lord Who did this bore tinned to approve of it'. struck it out:, although at the titne u of doing so he con neble metn t ber far King's Lynn luepolonrthtto shoveecas i o a n n , y an w d a d i o d f then the name which the: nownot bears.coneeirel that stood tbhye noble t o % uestion flees no regard the striking In the present case the q courage because ha acted, upon prudential consideratious. out of a clause which the Government deliberately intro duced into the b ill when they framed it, but the admis• sion of a clause proposed now for the first time, and sup-- Orted by some , w ho are not generally favourable to the . Pmea.aure; The right hon. member for Manchester tells tis to do what is right, and says that we shall be wanting in IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS _(YESTERDAY.) The house met at five o'clock. BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. The Marquis of CLANRICARDE complained of a breach of privilege in a return'which'had been laid upon their lordships' table. On the 7th of April last Earl Grey moved for copies of correspondence relative to any additions made to the department of war and colonies, and also with regard to any changes in the transaction of business relating to the administration of the army. On the first part of this motion the return was brought down to the 7th of April, the date of the motion ; but On the second the very first paper was dated the 9th of 'Way, and, in the shape of a letter from Sir C. Trevelyan, it was a complete reply to .Earl Grey's speech. This was an undoubted breach of privilege, and if passed over, a most mischievous precedent would be laid down. The Diike of NEWCASTLE said the return, in being made up to a date subsequent to the date of the motion, though technically irregular7-was not quite without pre cedent. The return was made exactly as the papers had been sent in ; and as they contained a defence of two officers in the commissariat department now absent from , the country, who conceived their characters to have been affected, he had not deemed it his duty to withhold them, though he admitted that it Was irregular to refer to their lordships' debates. The Earl of DERBY said the better course would have been for the noble duke to have received these explanations from the parties, and used them in his place in Parliament, rather than have made them part of a return. The return, as it stood, was much more than a technical violation of their lordships' priviliges. Earl FITZWILLIAM took the same view, and ob served that the two co►nmissaries in question could not have written these replies unless previous commu nications had been made to them. He recommended that the return should be withdrawn and amended. After some observations. from the Earl of ELLEN ' BOROUGH and Lord PANDIIIRE, The Duke of NEWCASTLE expressed his readiness to withdraw the return, and to produce another in an amended form. ENCUMBERED ESTATES (WEST INDIES) BILL. The Duke of NEWCASTLE moved the second read ing of the Encumbered Estates (West Indies) Bill. The noble duke described the embarrassed state of property in the West Indies, and said the object of this measure was to relieve it upon principles which had proved so successful in Ireland under the Encumbered Estates Act. Having quoted several authorities in favour of the mea sure, he said its main objects were to wind up estates as under a hankmptcy, to effect judicial sales, and to dis tribute the proceeds among the parties entitled in the cheapest form, and to confer an absolute title upon pur chasers. A commission would be appointed to carry the bill into execution, consisting of one chief and two assis tant commissioners. The chief commissioner would, under all circumstances, be resident in England. The assistants would either act with the chief commissioner in England, where they form a court, or under him in the colonies, either solely or in conjunction with local commis sioners, to be appointed in cases where such assistance was necessary. An order in council would be neces sary before the bill could be put into operation in any colony ; but such order in council could not be passed unless upon an address from the local legislature, and provision made for the expenses 'of locally carrying it into effect. In all cases an appeal would lie from the decision of the commissioners to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. Having mew ioned some other provisions of a minor character, the noble Duke ex pressed a hope that the measure would prove beneficial to the West India colonies, by encouraging the intro duction of fresh capital, by inducing residence, and by' diminishing the number of middlemen or agents. The'Earl of DERBY said some measure of this kind was absolutely necessary ; but he entertained doubts as to the efficiency of several of the proposed remedies. He reserved, however, his opinion until the bill was in corninittee. Lord St. LEONARDS doubted whether purchasers could be found for estates in the West Indies,' unless at prices ruinous to the present possessors ; and he made several suggestions with the view of obtaining legal diffictilties in carrying the act into effect. After a few observations from the Earl of Powis, Lord Brougham, the Lord Chancellor, and Lord St. Vincent. ' The bill was read the second time. The Church Building Acts Amendment Bill, the E1:47 copal and Capitular Esta.tes Management (1854) Bill, the Witnesses Lill, and the Customs Duties Bill were severally read the third time and passed. LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL (CANADA) BILL. On the order of the day being read for the house going into committee on this bill. The Earl of DERBY, after a warm attack upon the measure as an attempt to change the constitution of Canada from a monarchical to a democratic character, asked the Duke of Newcastle to postpone the committee for a week, on the ground of the thinness of the house and the want of sufficient notice. The Duke of NEWCASTLE strongly complained of the course taken by the noble earl as unfair, - and after some little altercation, The committee was postponed for a week. Adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS—(YESTERDAY.) The house resumed at six o'clock. OXFORD UNIVERSITY BILL. On the consideration of this bill as amended, Mr. PRINN said that, having given notice of his in tention to move a clause preventing credit being given to students at the university who had not attained the age of 21 years, he begged to state that, in consequence of an understanding that had been come to, he had the pleasure of meeting the. Solicitor-General yesterday, and he had then received an assurance that the Government intended to introduce a measure in reference to this matter gene rally, and which would not subject students, at Oxford to exceptional legislation ; and that in consequence of the unanimous feeling which-seemed to be entertained on the subject by both sides of the house, they expected to pass the measure this session. Under such circumstances, therefore, it was unnecessary to press his clause. Mr. then moved the following clauses : "From and afterthe Ist day of Michaelmas Term, 1854, it shall not be necessary for any person, upon matriculating in the University of Oxford, to make or subscribe any declaration, or to take any oath, save the oath of allegi ance, or an equivalent declaration of allegiance, any law or statute to the contrary n otwithstanding. From and after the Ist day of Michaelmas Term, 1854, it shallnot be necessary for any person, upon taking any degrees in arts, law, or medicine, usually conferred by the said Univer sity of Oxford,. to make or subscribe any declaration, or to take any oath, save the oath of allegiance, or -an-equiva lent declaration of allegiance, any law or statute to the ' contrary notwithstanding." He gave a Jaigtory of nuiver• AtlV::,,PAPkjit dignity if eve do not assert our opinions) and other house to asse r t th e i rs. Tha t ma y be a eery good? maxim, but I hope_ie leavetli will not belistenedte in future days, as it has not been lietereed VS - in days which are passed, by the House of"Lo - rds. Does the right hon. gen tl e man sup pose that the House of Lords, when they adopt a bill, always act in aecordance With their own opinions ? No ence to the opinion of the country, sdch thing. In many instances they adopt bills in defer to the repeal of the corn law as s , re e - h pr e es i e . e n p t e e e d l i o n e house. Does the right hon. gentleman thinkthat in as tenting lilitguhiotCurabllfe the House this navigation laws, and to many other measures, the House of 'Lerch; were merely following their own opinion and maxim, Lords should asserting a dtheir theo wrni and follow, his advice, frequent disputes would occur between the two branches of the Legislature. As it is, the House of Lord frequently—i n d ee d may say, commonly—defers to the opinion of the House of Commons and the country ; but in order to carry oe the legislation of 'the country it is necessary that the House of Commons should from time to time, and up o n questions that are _mot. of vital importance, consult the opinion and feeling of the other house. For these reasons, I think it would be inexpedient to risk the success of the bill in the other house by adding the clauses now proposed. I think it advisable that the university, with its new and improved constitution, should have the opportunity of con sidering and determining on the question of the admission of Dissenters.. lam ready to say, however, that if the university should ; diseppoint my expectation in this mate ter—if it should - continue to refuse to admit the whole of the people to a paiticijyttion in the benefits of that insti tution, flee State Would. have the right of compelling it to _ take that course by passing a bill for the purpose e end T go ferther and say that, under those circumstances , such a _ bill ought to 'be introduced. The house, however, should recollect that this question has been under the considera tion of Parliament on many occasions, after intervals of several years% The question was brought forward in 18:14, when I look pert.inthe debate and voted in favour of the motion. It was. not again introduced for a considerable period, and now it is introduced after an interval of six or seven years. This shows that the Dissenters have not thought the question one of pressing urgency. 'They have shown their willingness to wait. (A. laugh.) Having waited so long, why not wait a few years longer? (" Oh, oh," and laughter.) I believe that if you press the ques tion now, you .will fail in carryin • • g it, and that if you press it in a few years hence you are pretty certain. to suc ceed. (Laughter.) For my part, I have always voted for the admission a Dissenters to the universities when ever the 'question has been brought on. It is not my fault that the question has not been pressed every year; if it had I should have voted for it, but I cannot consent to the introduction of the clauses into the bill, because I think it Would cause the measure to be defeated. Mr. GIBSON said the noble lord appeared to have Mis understood what fell from him. He did not say that he wished the clauses to be introduced in order to cause the defeat of the bill, but that the loss of the bill might be iet paired by the introduction of a better measure in a future session. ' Mr. HEYWOOD, amidst cries fora division, was under stood to 'say that, upon the present occasion, he was chiefly anxious that the principle involved in his clauses should be established. . The house then divided— For the clause 252 Against it ' Majority —9l The cheers at the a nnouncement'of the numbers were loud and long continued. The clause for the admission of Dissenters to the Uni versity of, Oxford was then added to the bill. Mr. HEY WOOD,theri moved that the following, clause be also added to the bill :—" From and after the first day of Michaelmas term, 1854, it Shall not be necessary for any person upon taking any of the degrees in arts, law, or medicine; usually conferred by the said University of Ox ford, to make or subscribe any declaration, or to take any oath, save the oath of allegiance, or an equivalent declara tion of Allegiance, any law or statute to the contrary not withstanding." . . Lord J. RUSSELL—The house having declared its opinion so unequivocally on the first aniendineht, I beg to state that it is not my wish to take a visiun on the second amendment proposed by the hon. gentleman. Mr. WA.LPOLE rose amid loud cries of " Divide !" One word (said the hon..gentlemen), and only one word on the second clause. The house has simply affirmed at the pre sent moment this that for the purposes of educa tion (the ground taker' by my right hon. friend the Chan cellor of the Exchequer) there shall be no bar to the ad mission of Dissenters to the university. But the second question which is now going to be put to the house is this —whether for the purposes of government—(No, no)— , whether for the purposes of government— (No, no). The right hon. gentleman who cries " No, no !" cannot have considered, the distinctive difference between- the two clauses. By the clause which you have just adopted you admit Dissenters to the university for the purposes of edu cation, but by the second clause now proposed you admit Dissenters to, take degees which• will enable them to vote in convocation, and a distinct power will be given to Dia , venters to take part in the government of the university. (Loud cheers.) But that is not all. If you pass this second clause, not only . will you give to Nonconformists the power of government in the university,. but you will give to them aright to claim a share in endowments which it was never ietended they ehould,participate in. (Cries of "Norancl cheers.) I am surprised that the ::noble lord should give up his principles, as he seems prepared to do. I appeal most earnestly to the Government to persevere in their op' position to the second : amendment, and I do not despair, if they will stand firm and true to their opposition, though they may not suceeed this evening, they will be able on another occasion to carry their own proposition into effect, which proposition is, that since you have given freedom to the university, and freedom to the colleges, you should leave to them the option and trust to them the discretionof determining, since you have decided that Dissenters shah have the right of being admitted to the university, upon what terms and in what way they are to be admitted, so as not to interfere with the general efficiency of the university, nor with that religious education which alone ought to be continued within the precincts of the univeraity. (Cheers.) Whether the noble lord and his colleagues will cry " Ay" upon this clause with those with whom they have cried "No" upon the other, I do not pretend to say, but whether I go into the lobby alone or not—(loud cheers from the ()won •u o n)—l will raise my voice and eive my vote against this second clause—(cheers)—and the only words I will add are, that the Government are bound to support me. M r , BROTHERTON rose amid cheers, cries of " Oh" and "Divide!" which rendered his voice inaudible. SIIITFI also attempted to address the house, but the confusion and excitement were so great that not a syllable reached the gallery. Lord J. RUSSELL —I beg to say that what I said was that, I did not wish to divide the house after the unequi- vocal expression of *its opinion. But having argued against this clause, if there is a division I shall vote against it. (Loud cheers from the Opposition.) The house again divided— For the clause I9EI e. Against Majority —9 After the cheering with which the announcement was received hat subsided, Lord J. RUSSELL said he proposed to proceed with the report to-day at 5 o'clock. In answer to Mr. Lord J. RUSSELL said it was very desirable that the . bill should go early to the House of Lords, and he hoped the house would consent tolta being read a third time on Monday. Mr. WIGRAM asked if notice would be given of any amendment to be proposed by the Government. The CaANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said the G o vernment had several amendm ents to propose on the re port, but all in accordance with the previous understanding of the house. If they had any material amendment upon ortiou of the' bill, or on the clauses introduced, they any pand give notice would move Won the third reading , to morrow. BRIGHT said, unless the hon. member_for North Mr. • e . tt asked the opinion of the House on the Lancashire aeon clause which •was the subject of discussion that evening, on the tilled reading ha should do so. The division on the question had been so peculiar, the noble lord the leader of the house havitigstated that the second resolution followed naturally and logically upon the first, that he hoped by Monday the noble lord would find means of con rerting some of the hon. gentlemen who sat near him, as it was very desirable the question should be settled ; and really, having carried the first proposition. what could be so natural as that the other should follow ? He hoped after two or three days' consideration they would be able to carry the second_ clause, perhaps without a division — (laughter) but, at all events, by a respectable majority. Some reference had been made to the House of Lords that hones had conceded matters before in deference to public opinion and the. wish of the House of Commons, and he appealed to the noble lord to urge upon his col leagues in the other house to adopt on the present occa sion a, sitnilier course, which he was sure was one that would strengthen their position with the public. Mr. HEYWOOD said he thould certainly move t he in -1 troduction of the second clause again on the third reading, and gave.notice accordingly. Mr. NEWPEGATE was convinced that a great number of hon. members did not exactly understand the connexion that existed between the first and second clauses. C trusted of "Olt.") ,Hon• members might cry "oh," bu n t h Leohdon at and believed that those hon. members of i nn& instead present would be in their places on M ?,35 favour of the clause there of the majority they had seen in expression of would be something more like a legitimateh of England on this' the feeling of members of the Church t atsuch a change would point. He was quite confident • 1 . • ions as would indi ' the uututters on the two ivis be seen in had been a misunderstanding on the oats clearlCliat there oh "' subject. Oh, . ) OISE DUTIES ( SUGAR) BILL. On the motion for the third readin g of this bill, Mr.IIANKEY hoped the hon. gentleman the Secretary of the Treasury would give some explanation upon the pro posed additional ditty of 7s. upon sugar used for brewing purposes, and which he had promised to consider, with a view to its reduction, on a former occasion. He (Mr. Hankey) suggested 6s. would be quite sufficient. m t ., WILSON said, that the rate proposed was some what higher than, upon reconsideration, was thoUght ne cessary, and he should now move that a duty of 6s. 61 be substituted for the proposed duty of 7s.' The motion was agreed to, and the bill, having been read a third time, was passed, after a few words from Mr. M`MAHON, who recommended that, in order to en courage the Irish agriculturists, the duty on beetroot sugar used in bre*ing should be half the duty imposed on foreign sugar. 'The louse resolve& into committee on- the Warwic Astlees Bill. a rt of the Mr..DIGBY SEYMOVR said, that in the p house wherehe was sitting, he could notunderstood what was going on, and, as a bill of his, the Bills n the order paper,. and pro l nissory Notes Bill, which stood o edge, he moved had been passed, over without his knew' that the Chairncin - report progre. there were : The committee then divided, when - /5 „........ es— Tor report i ng pregress ........... . se Against it — .................... ...... —43 Majority ......... h ......... with some verbal The bill then went throug tom et en ee . wi amendments. , The house adjourned at 20 minutes after 1 o'clock. 9 I /4 7 - g' . 4' ' ViblAy fif. -,?,- -, - , ‘Z ....., ',1, • ;4'l' , • , . •.„.....,%, ~, 4 • Ax. HOUSE OF COAlMONS—Jrnitati• ... . ri .' 4 . . OXFORD UNIVERSITY BILL. '' L S Clause considered—That it shall not be necessary for 1111'r , 'p.arson, upon matriculating inithe Unive rs it y o f O x f or d, to take any'oath, save-the Oath of allegiance, or an aqui ivalent thereto, Forthe second reading, ayes 252, n oes 161. 5 AYES-22. . • Adair, Ft Freestun, Gel. W. Muntz, a Aglionby, R. Fr'wen. C. Morrough, J. • AlcoMr, T. Gardner, R. Naas, Lord - A Ini-ntion, Sir J. Glsitell, J. 11, el. G. Annesley, Earl of Geach, C. Norreys. Lord Atherton, W. Gibson ' T. Rorreys, Sit D v ... Riley, lair J. Gllpin,Col. n. North, r. -. sail, E. Glyn, G. Oakes, J. . Ball, J. Goderich, Viscount. O'Brien, Sir T. _ ~ Barnes, T Gower, F. O'Brien, C. Barrington, Viscount Greenall. G. O'Connell, .T. .':on't Bass, T.----. Green, Capt John Oliveira, B. 1,1 ::' :1.5 .Bateson. Capt T. Gregson, S. Ot way, A. -- ;Beamish, F. Gren fell, Chas. Pechell, Sir G. Bell. J. GreviA Gel. Jr. , repair. A.. ~-. 'Berkeley, Hon. C Grey, it: - - Petty, I. ' Biddulp ; 91. R. 7,1. GrosvkAiiii Ld. R... 70. v airky, 'Sir T. Biggs, W. .D ;.. ' Iladflehl, 0, :Pete, S. ~ • • ...1' Blackett, 3'.l l 'llllHall , Sir 8.. \_, ~,, ,r h i lip ps, J. slatr, Col: - .7ALen 6 / elllanken T. n., • rhuucnore, J. 1.,, B on ham-Carter, J. Hastie, Alex. minn ~,,. ,y,i, rouverie, n on -_ z; B. Elm*, A rehd. Filkingtou,.ll F. Bowyer. G. • r . Jiiiitsl air El _,. 'Pinney, 07. - .‘, Boyle, Lt.-Col. He vd a.n, T. Pollar.l-17r4ilhart, W. Heatheote, G. Ponsonby, A. Brady, J. B. w. . liewage, (fee. - Potte - r7R, - Heywortia-F4-- 3 ; 1 ". e;`Prlce',Air. Bright, J. Brocklehurst J. Bi Hin g; dley, iffss 0 .4 tranor . I PAms ( ten - • Sir J. Beockman, E.D. C... Hogg, Sir..LW. card o, 0. Brotherton J. . Brown; H. ' 119rsfall, T. ', i L t liicn, H. Brown, W. Horsman, E. _ I ..v,Atobartes,'T. Bruce. H. A. Howard, C. Robertson, P. "Burke. Sir T. ; Hudson, Gp .- - ( iv ~ R e„buct, J. Butt, I. T. Hutchins, E.- .4 t;.r. -11 Yng, G. Hutt, W. Itu "ell, F. C. Cairns, ii. Ingham, R. Sawle, C. Campbell, Sir A. Jackson, W. Scholefleld. W. Castlerosse, Viscount Jocelyn, Viscount Seehell. Capt. G. Cavern:lW C, Johnston& J.,,, , g•S t St F • Cavendish, G. Tilly, F. Csylsy. Z. Ke ati og, R. ' Keating, IL- ---- ' gu lly, iey S ey mour, Lord Challis T. - ;Kendall. N. Chaplin, W. Kennedy T. Seymour, B. Cheetham, John Kersh aw .. 7 . Seymour, W. Christopher. Robt: A. King,,P, Shaft° R. "Clay.,Sir. W. Bt. Rinnaird. A. Shee, Set% W. Clifford, LL-CoI.H.H Kirk, W. Sheridan, R. Cobden'. R. Knightley, It. Smith, J. A. loffiu, W. L octl, Sir E. Smith, J. '3. Cogan, W. IL F. Laing, S. Smith, R. Cranford, E. H. J. Lankston, J. 11. Stafford, MarqUlS Crook, J. Lam. ton. H. G. Stanley, Lord Crossley, F. La'lett. W. Stirling.. W. Carrie, Raikes Layard, A. H. Strickland, Sir G. Davie. .1r It. 11. P. Leo , W. Struts B. ..............,,,. Davison, R. Lomax, Lot dm. Stuart, L or d D. . Denison, J. E. Liddell, 11. G. Tancred. H. Dent, J. Lindsay, W. Thicknesse, R. Dering sir E. C. Loc k e. J. * Thompson, G. Divett, E. ' Lockhart, A. E. ?homely, T. . fled. J. W. Lucas, F. Thornhill, W. , Duff, G. Macartney, G. Tollemache,.T. Duff, J. • Mackie, J. Tomlin. G. fluke, Sir J. M•tlann, T. Tl , lll, G. Duncan, G. Macgregor, John Uxbridge. Earl , Duncombe, T. Mac J a hon, P. Vane, Lord 11. McTaggart. Sir .1. Van', Lord A. Dundaa, G. Dunlop, A. Macguire, J. Vanslttart. G. Dunne, Col. Mandeville, Vis. Vernon, 0. I Egerton E. Mangles, R. 1). Vivian, J. 11. Ellice, E. Manners, Lord G. Vivian, 11. H. Ellice, E., Jun. idaJoribanks, D. Waimsley, Sir J. Elliot, J. Massey. IV, Whitbread. S. Emlyn, Vis. Miall, H. Wickham, n. w. Ewart, W. Miiligan, R. Wilkinson, W. Feilden, M. Mills, T. Willcox, B. Fergus, 3. . Milner, W. Williams, NV. Enact . ; raid, W. Michell, Dr. W. W inntrigton, Sir T. F ley, J. Mitchell, T. Vv se. A. Forster, C. Moffatt, G. Woodd B. Forster, J. Montgomery, Sir G. Wyvil, M. Fox, R. ' Morris, D. TELLER/. Fox, W. Mostyn, E. Heywood, J. Franklin, G. IdtViings, J. Jollier, R. P. NOES-161. Acland, Sir T. Goddard, A. Ossul ston, Lord A'Court, C. Ger.-. W. Parke, C AVerley. C. Geulburn, H. • Pakington, Sir I. 'Archdall, M. Graham, Sir J. Palmer, Robert Ai It, riett, G. Grahntn,"Lortt Aft Painter, Itoundeil 1 Bailey, C. Granby, Marquis of Palmerston, Via Baldock. Ei• Grey, Rt--HonSir 0 • Parker. It. B ring, H. Gwyn, ll.' Peel, Sit R. Barrow, W. Hale, H, , Peel, F. Beckett, W. Hamilton, G. A. Peel, Col. J. Bective, Earl Hamilton, J. IL Pennant , Col. E. Bennet, Capt P. ' Harcourt, G. Phillimore, R. J. Bentinek, Lord H. Ilarcourt- Col. F. Portal M. Sent . nek, G. Heathcote, Sir IV. Powlett, Lord W, Beresford; Rt. Ha. W. Heneage, Geo. IL Pritchard, J. Ile;keley. G. Henley, J. Pugh, D. Bethell; Sir R. Herbei t, S. Reptem, G. • Brans on. T. W. Hervey, Lord A. Ru-sell, Lord J. ruce, Lord E. Hilyard, It. C. Sandars, G. Buckley, Gen. Hothain, Lord Seemer, H. Burr 11, Sir C. Hughes, W. Shirley, E. surroughes ' FL Trtoo, S. Stnijth, - dr W. Cccii, Lord H. Jolins'one, Sir J. smith, NV. Chelsea, Viscount .lolmfie, Sir W. Smith, Abel ;Clinton, Lord R. It P. Jones, Capt. T. Somerset, Capt. E. Clive, lion. R. li. Kna•ebbali, W. Sotheron, T. ,Cohhoid, J. C. Knox, W. S. Spooner, 11 Cock% T. S. - Lane ton, W. H. P. G Stafford, A. Codrington, Sir C. W Lascelles, E. Stanhope. J. Coles. H. S. Lawley, F. C. Starlie, Le G. Colville, C. R. Legit, G. C. ' Sutton, J. Compton, 11. C. Lennox, Lord A. F. Taylor, Lt.-Col. J. Cowper, W. F. ' Liddell, H. T. Taesiger, Sir F. -•- Cut,itt, W. Lindsay, Col. J. - Tudway, It. Deedes, W. Lisburne, Earl Tyler. Sir G. Denison, E. B. Lockhart, W. Tyrell, Sir .T. Disraeli. B. Lovaine, Lord Villiers, F. - Druinlvnrig, Vis. Lowther, Capt. Vyse, Capt. 11. Duneorabe, Hon. 0. Luce, T. Waddington, H. Duncombe. Hon.W. Macgregor, Jas. Walcott, Admiral Da Pre. C. Maddock, Sir T. H. Walpole, S. East, Sir J. Malitts,-It. West, F. Egerton, Sir F. March, Earl of Whitmore, H. Egerton, W. Ai asterman, J. Wigram, Loftus T. Elmley.VlS. Maunsell, T. Willoughby, Sir H. Evelyn, VI, Meux, Sir H Wood, Sir C. Farnham, E. Mlles, W. Wortley, J. A. Farrer, J. Morgan, 0. Wynn, Major W. Felowes,E, Mowbray, J. Wynne, W. Ferguson, sir It. Mundy, W. Yorke, E. Filmer, Sir E. Napier. J. Young. Sir .J. - Floyer, J. Neeld, John Forbes, N. . Newark. Viscount < =LW. Galway. Viscount. Newdegate, C. Hayter„ W. • Gladstone, W. North, Lt.-Col. .7, wigrave, Ead of • /.77 . A AP P411Z1A312 ~ .x "fir a ~. Another clanse-Pfr.-lleywood)—That it shall not be neces sary for any person, upon taking any degrees in law, art, or medicine, in the University of Oxford, to take any oath, save the oath of allegiance, or an equivalent. For the second reading of the clause, ayes 196, noes 205. AYES-196. Adair, 11. Fox, R. Aglionby, 11. Fox, W. Alcock, V. Freestun, Col. Anderson, Sir J. Gardner, R. Atherton, W. Gaskell, J. 'tall, E. (leach, C Ball, J. Gibson, M. Barnes, T. Glyn, G. Bass, M. . Godertch, Viscount Beam's!), F. Gower, F. Bell. J.- • Greene, Capt. - John Berkeley, Hon. C. Gregson, Samuel BiddiVph. Col. R. 11/. Grenfell, Charles Biggs, W. Greville, Colonel F. Blacke t, J. F. B. - , Grey, R. B naatn-Carter, J. Grosvenor, Ld. It. Bouverie; lion. E. P. Haddeld, George Bowyer. G. . 110. Sir Benjamin Boyle, Lt -Col. Mulkey, T. Brady, J. Basile, Alex. Brand, H. B. W. Basile, Arehti. Bight, J. HeadlaM. T. Brock iehurst. J. Hey worth, L. Brockman, E. D. Higgins, G. 0. Brotherton, J. Hindley, C. Browo, R. Hogg, Sir J. W. frown' W. Horsman. E. Bruce, 11. A. Howard, R n. C. lurke, Sir T. But•thing, E: Butt, I. - Hutt, W. Byng, G. H. C. Ingham, R. Castierosse, , Vis: Jackson, W. Cavendish, C. C. Johnstone, S. Cayley, E. S. Keating, R. Challis, T. • • Heating, IL Cheetham, John K e nnedy, T. Kershaw, J. Clay, Sir W. Et. K ershaw, Clifford, Lt.-Col. H. M. Kin, Kirk, g W. Cobden, B. Lacon, Sir E. cam), w• Cogan, W. H. F. Laing, S. Collier, R. P. • Langton, H. G. Craitfurd, E. 11.5. Laslett, IV. Crook, J. Layard, A. H. .. Crossley. F. Lee, W. ' ' - Currie, itaikes Lindsay, W Davie, Sir 11 R. F. Locke, J. I ienison, J. E. Lockhart, A. R. Dent, J. D. Lucas, F. Dering. air E. C. Mackie, J. Divett,,E. 31`Cann, J. Duff, G. MacGregor, John Duff,',T. MacMahon, P. Duke, Sir J. McTa4gart, Sir J. Duncan, G. Maguire, J..F. Dinicombe, r. 34 angtes, R. Dundat, G. -- Marjoribanks, D. .Dunlop. A. Massey, W. Egerton E. M all, E. Ellice, E. Milligan, R. mite, E., jun. Mills, T. Elliot, J. E. Milner, 'W. Ewart, W. di icae - 1, - Dr. W. Fergus, J.. Mitchell, T. Foley, J. - :Moffatt, G. Forster, C. - Morris: D. Forster J. Moityn, E. Aeand, Sir T, Freiwwae N nv t) A'Court, C. Noel, G. Ga , , E N;nt OILS -20 5 • Newark , Viscount . Newilegate, C. Gilpin, Col, 11. Adderley, C. North, Lt.-Col. J. Annesley, Earl of Gladstone, ..W• Oakes, J. A rchdall. M. A Goddard, Ossulston, LOIA Arkwright, G. Clore, W. Parke, C. Bailey, sir J. ou itairri. H. Bailey, C. Graham, Sir J. Pakington,e4e,J„ Graham, Lord M. Palmer, Itale i rt Flatiock. E. Granby, Marquis of Palmer, Roturdell Raring, 11. 01 luta'', Gilbert Palniqr_St Barrington. Vie. GI Thomas• 94, Swum ,ej l e, Parker, R - , Barrow. W. f "r a scei, Capt. iv G ey. Mt Hon.:lW G. Peel, Sleß7o! Beckett, W.....„ G `‘`Yn4iiew°l • - • Peel, F. fiectivel. Oiirl'-'-- Hale, l bert , , Peel;'Col. l'. BenneoCapt: P.r, , Hamilton, ti, ,5,,, , . i , 'reran 4'. 1 3 en tinck,Lerd 11. - ..,11amilton James, R. . Phill more, R. S. Beatuick. LI. • - " l " 49l4 lreoutt, Geo. , 1.. ponso" iiii, A. Beresford„ 11- 41 1 1 %f Wolin, Col. - F, ' Portal, M. „, B er keley, G. eiafticote--, str G: " , Pevale. t, Lord •T • Betliell, Sir 111' 71 - 00 Ileatiscote;4. 2 * -,, , .4- l itchard, J. Blair, Lieut -Col. J. H. Heathcoate, Six*. ' pixel). p_ Bramston, T. W. - ilahaakii, 1a46 - 4 :V..l;c7iscapten, O. Bruce, Lord E. Buckle y, Oen. Iletiekto 4,.. 0 . Robe Ton, T 116"1"c ' Eon. I 'Lord J. Burrell, Sir C. M . Herbert; .- allit 1""' Burroughes, IL N. ''' San ders, G. Hervey, loi'lite' . sawle, C. Cairns, It ilaYaxn''it S c ymer, li. - Campbell, Sir ',A.. I. Hotloso; Eielle 1 0' Sh ir ley, E. Cal': ndish, G. C. Hudson, G. ~p-4, :smijth. sdr W. Cecil, Lord Badies, W• serth, W. Chaplin, W. Sail h, Abel Chelsea, Viscount J lrt oh ° n n s ' t;T; Somerset, Capt. E. Christopher, Rout A. " lifr s e• capt: T. •- '' ' - Sivir..l%. ' Fotheron T. Clibton, L:.rd B. B. r. Jones, N. Spooner, ' lt. Clive, IL Knatchbull. W. Stafford,'A. . cobbt,lcl, J. C. Knightley, R. Stanhope, J. Cockk, T. §. K nox, WS. Starkic, Le 0. Codring , on. Langton, W. W. H. P. G . Sutton, J. Sir C. . Coles. ii• 13 ' Lascelles, E. Taylor, Lt.-Ctil .- T: Colvile. C. R• c , L a vriey, e. C. Thesiger, sir. F. .. comptontli• ' • Legh, G. C. Thornhill, W. Co Wper' ‘ ,7 • ' Lennox, Lord A. F. Tollemache,.T. , Bubli-t. ll ' . Liddell, H. G. Tudway , It. Davison, Br Liddell, H. T. - - Tyler. Sir G. -geodes W. ,B. B. Lindsay Lt.-Col. J. Tyrell, Sir J. 1131esnriasecri, Rt. Hon. B. . Lisburne, Earl vinsit t art., CI. pod, d• W. Lockhart, W. Vernon, G. lli F. Drumlan -, ig, V is. Lovaine, Lord. ' Vi ers, Duc kworth, Sir J. T. Lowther, Cat. H. vrp, Capt. B, Dunconabe, Hon. 0. Luce T. Waddington, H. Anicombe, Hon.W.E' Islacartney,,G. Walcott, Rear-Ad: Du Pre, C. • MacGregor Jas. Walpole. S. . East, Sir J. Maddock, Sir T. 11. Weal, F. 'Egerton, Sir P. Mallns, R. Whitmore, B. Eton, W. • Mandeville, Viscount Wig ram, ' Loftus T. ,F.lmley, Vis. Manners, Lord ti. Willoughby, Sir 7 5 -• -'Emiini, Vie. ' March, Earl of Wood, Sir C. Evelyn, W. E. Mastermau, J. Woodd, B. ~ Farnham, E. lit aunSell, Col. T. Wortley. J• °1,,- Farrer. J. Meux, Sir R. Wpm, c .„,.aPi• ' l4 * Feildell, H. •, . Miles, W. • Wlliiik," • Fellowes, E. - - Montgomery, Sir G. torte. •••• Vergnsou, Sir R . Morgan. 0. l'ougg , sir J. ilm:!, Sir E. Mowbray, 3. Fitigerald, W. !Audi k, gt. :', . Floyer, J. - ,-.- Mundy, W. Forbes, W. - Napler, -- 3. flayter, W. Franklin 0. Necld, Jolla biulgrave, BEI of Muntz, G. Murrough. Z. Norreys, Lord Norreys, Sir D. North, F O'Brien, Sir T. O'Brien, C. O'Connell, J. Oliveira, Ti. Otway, A. Pechell, Sir G. Pell +it, A. Perry, Sir E. Pet o. S. Phi limore, J. G. Phinn, T. Pilkington, J. Pinney, W. Pollard-Urquhart W , Potter, It. Puce W. Ramsdell, Sir J. Ricardo, J. Ricardo, 0. • Rich, H. Robartes. T. Roebuck, Z._ Russell, F. C. Scholelleld, W. Soibell. Capt. Q. Scully, F. Scully. v Seymour, Lord Seymour, H. Seymour. W. Shafto, R. Serjt. W. Sheridan, It. Smith, J. A. Smith, J. B. Smith, M. Smith, R. Strickland, Sir G. Strati, E. Stuart, Lord D. Tancred, H, Thicknesse, R. Thom: son, G. Thornvly, T Trail, G. itibridge, Earl Vane, Lord H. Vivian, J. H. Vivian, H. H. Walmsley, Sir J. Whitbread, S. Wickham, H. Wilkinson, W. Wilcox, B. Williams, W. Wise, A. Wy trill, M. TELLzsi. Heywood. J. liinnaird, A. TzixisS. •