The Sun. — London, England, 1833-07-03 00:00:00

WWII for the discussion o ftbe subject. He would ask any one, too, whether the question had not been sufficiently before that House—to say nothing of the incidental die cussion respecting it on the occasion of the Coercion Bill —orthe Cburch Bill : and the other day, when his Noble Friend brought in his measure as to the tithes of 1831, 1832, and 1833, in the principle of which the Hon. Gentleman had expreesA his concurrence. He should be less surprised at the present motion, if be imagine i the Hon. Gentleman himself thought any practical good could result from it ; or that, by the present discussion, tithes could be placed on a new basis. He would not then give any posit ve opinion of Isis own; hut be did not doubt that a measure might be devised, in order to effete permanently the tranquillity of Ireland ; but surely they would next year Le in a better position for this than now. Another reason for delay was, that in cow quence of the measure of his Noble Friend regarding the tithes of 1831, 1832, and 1833, they would be able to go on in a state of tranquillity till May next, there being no payment due till then. Ha would be the last man to maintain a church in parishes where there was no congre gatien—(Cheers)—for by so doing they, in his opinion, only maintained ground where the enemy could safely enter and attack the establishment itse'f.—(Cheers.) With respect to tithes, he hoped the landlords of Ireland would he willing to make some sacrifice for the public advantaue. It was only with their aid that the British Parliament could make any good and satisfactory arrangement effective, and witt.ont their ail any attempt of the kind =Pt be expected to be attended with confusion and bloodshed, although the attempt might be to establish a system of the most advantageous kind in Ireland. Whatever form the question of tithes might assume, and if must assume some form, they individually would have no right to possess themselves of that which belonged to the church—( Hear, bear)—nr, if not to the church, belonged to the state.— (Cheers.) The right to that property was not theirs— (He r, bear)—and the laws which protected that property, whatever form those laws might assume, must be asserted and maintained. He had no hesitation in moving the previous question. Mr. F. O'CONNOR observed, that they were told that the law must be enforced with respect to tithes as with respect to other property. There was one difference, how ever, which the Right Hon. Gentleman did not seem to have adverted to. It was this—that the law created the property in tithes, while it only protected property of anotherdescription.—(Hear.) He blamed the conduct of the Ministry with respect to the question. It could not be denied that tithes bad been a great source of discontent in Ireland, and the people would not be satisfied till the Ministry did something really to put an end to them. Mr. MORE O'FERRALL said. the only principle of any value in this Bill, when first introduced, Ilan been struck out by the Ministry themselves, whose Bill it was, and who had thus rendered it good for nothing. This Bill of theirs would create more disturbances in Ireland than any other measure had previously done. Mr. STANLEY could not object to the principle of the first resolution, because he believed it was copied from the report of the Tithe Committee, to which he himself had agreed ; neither could he deny that tithes had been the fruitful parent of misery and in Ireland ; but the question now was, whether the evils which had arisen from this source, were not now about to be got rid of by the measure which the Government bad introduced. Be fore entering on that question, he must say a word or two on the often misrepresented expression of extinction of tithes. Having done so now, he should consider it as done once for all, and never would enter on the question again. He b.— ged the attention of the House to the occasion on which that expression was used, and the circumstances attending the use of it. The Hon. Member for Wicklow, who had introduced the debate on tbat occasion, had said that " the system of tithes was unjust in principle, and tyrannical in operation ; and that it made a difference be tween the rich and the poor, because the rich man, by turning his arable land into pasture, might evade the tax, which it was impossible for the poor man to do, who was compelled to live on the produce of his pota'oe ground." Why, it should be recollected in the first place, that that was the system created by the Irish Parliament, so often the subj et of the praise of the Hon. Member for the city of Waterford—for it was they that made agistment the exception to liability to tithes, and thus created the invi dious distinction between the poor and the rich. Mr. BARRON had not eulogised this system ; he had only given it as an instance of the interference of the State with tithe property. Mr. STANLEY—That might be so, but still it was true that this sort of interference, so favourable to the rich, and unjust to the poor, was the work of the Irish Parliament.—(Hear.) In answer to the observations thus made on the evils of the system of tithes, and in answer to a question from Mr. Croker, he (Mr. Stanley) Lad raid that the object the Government had in view, was, " the extinction of the present system of tithes."— (Hear, hear.) The report of the Committee, to,, said that tithes were to be exchanged for a commutation on land, or for a charge on land. It was quite impossible that the public should have been misled by such an ex pression. uttered under such circumstances. —( Hear. ) He admitted that the present system of tithes had been the parent of much misery in Ireland, but in what man ner ? It was in their mode of assessment—in the various modes in which they were collected, and in all the practical details connected with their collection —and all of these objections would be done away by their conversion into what was virtually and really a land tax. The difference between the present system and any other must be in the persons by whom the tithes were col lected, or the persons by whom they were paid. He much suspected that the -objections to the Ministerial measure pro eeded front those by whom the tithes must be paid. The burden would now be taken from the shoulders of the poor and put upon those of the rich—upon those who in the Irish Parliament had had sufficient influence to get passed such a system as that which he had read and described in the sentence taken from the speech of the Hon. Member, whose sentiments I he had quoted. All would now pay according to the value of the land, of which they were the occupiers. All the small charges that were so oppressive in their opera ration wou'd be got rid of—the tithes themselves would no longer be a direct tax upon industry—they would be paid, not by the tenant, but by the landlord. Anti if the tenant suffered from a heavier burden than at present, he would know to whom to impute the evil; and that to the landlord, and not to the clergyman, be must look for relief.—(An Hon. Member—" Tbat is unjust towards the landlords.") Unjust towards the landlords ! Would the Hon. Member tell the House what be meant by the expression, whether he meant by relief from tithes to get a pecuniary benefit to the landlords ?—(No, no.) He believed that they might think—intend—with that it should be so—(No, no)—but were there any who would get up in that House and declare that such were their sentiments ?—(Another interruption here took place.) The Hon. Member said the land was his—(Hear, hear) --it wareo—Le had bought it and paid for it, but be bought it subject to tithes--(Hear, hear)—he paid a less price for it, because it was subject to tithes—be let it sub ject to tithes; and if the tithes were now removed, he would he able to let or sell it for a higher price than before. But if the clergy were to be deprived of the tithes, he was not the person who was to reap the advan tage of their loss—he was not to be permitted to take to the full that of which the clergy had been de prived, to take it for his own benefit from the suffer ipg tenant, and then complain of the exactions of the clergy. In order to carry the Tithe Composition Bill fairly tuts effect, no pains bad been spared, and the resolution of to-night had been met at all points by the alteration of the plan originally proposed by Ministers. Into the latter part of the Hon. Mover's argument he would not enter ; but he would say, that no wan ought to attempt to divert to public purposes any portion of the property of the church, until it had been seen tbat the purposes of that church bad been amply accomplished. The question of surplus still remained open. He bad his own opinions on the subject, but he should not now press them, under the persuasion that it was the wish of the House that that topic should be left to future deliberation. He concurred with his Hon. Friend (Mr. Littleton) who had moved the previous ques. Lion, under the conviction that the proposed resolution would give rise to fruitless and, therefore, mischievous Discussion. Mr. O'CONNELL perceived in the speech of the Right Hon. Gentleman who had ju st sat down , a continu• ation of that unrelenting disposition, which refused to give anything to Ireland. The affairs of that unhappy country were now in other hands, and he earnestly hoped that Ministers would not allow the Right Hon. Gentle man to interfere with them.—(Clieers and laughter.) They ought to be warned by the failure of his previous Bill, and the mismanagement of which he had been guilty ought to show them that he was no longer fit to he their guide.—(Hear, hear.) Ireland was not a colony ; it was an integral part of the British empire; and it was quite enough for the Eight Hon. Gentleman to conduct his own department, and regula t e 800,000 negroes, without attempting longer to control the people of Ireland.— (Cheers.) It was very true that the Right Mon. Gentle man bad not used the terms " extinction of tittles" in the ordinary sense— Mr. STANLEY said that his expression bad been " the extinction of the tithe system." Mr. O'CONNELL—The Right Hon. G. etleinan alight have it which way be pleased, but with whatever ingenuity it was urged, the people neither of England nor Ireland would be deceived by his special pleading. The real question was—ought one sect of Christians to he compelled to pay the clergy of another sect?—(Hear. hear.) The Roman Catholics would never consent to support the present enormous church establishment in Ireland; they ought not to be compelled to support it; the universal cry was against it, and it was re-echoed by the Protestant Dis•enters of England, who had the same right to be freed from the payment of tithes. Did Minis ters suppose that the way to make Roman Catholics become Protestants was to shower upon them latitats and writs from the Exchequer? If they wished to procure converts, let them rather put forward the Right lion. Gentleman ; the sweetness of his disposition, and the kindness and urbanity of his manners towards the Irish and Ireland, would be sure to accomplish the object.— (Cheers and laughter.) All would speedily join that church, to which he was so devotedly attached that he was resolved to make others pay for it.—(Cheers.) Hr had disturbed the condition of Ireland in order that be might bring forward the Coercion Big; hut Ministers would find, perhaps too soon, in the words of the pro verb, that it was the last feather that broke the camel's back. He trusted, ere long, that Ireland would get rid of the incubus of a church in which she did not believe. Mr. LITTLETON explained that Ministers were n:.e to be c usidered pledged to any measure next year. Mr. LEFROY said, that as nineteen-twentieths of the property of Ireland belonged to Protestants, it was just that they should pay for the maintenance of their own re ligion, and the tithe must ultimately fall on the land. Besides, whatever might be the fact in Ireland, the Pro testant church was the church of the vast majority of the inhabi , ants of the empire. Mr. O'CONNELL and Mr. LEra.ov successively explained. Lord ALTHORP complained of the most unprovoked and unfair attack made by the Hon. Member for Dublin (Mr. O'Connell) upon hie Right Hon. Friend (Mr. Stanley). It seemed as if the Hon. Member had been so frequently in contest with his Right Honourable Friend, that whether their notions were accordant or discordant, a rencoutre con d not be avoided.—(Hear.) The invective pronounced was certainly characterised by great ability, but in other respects the individual who bad pronounced it was hardly to be envied.—(Cheers.) The avowed object of the Hon. Member for Dublin was, that there should be no church establishment in Ireland; but that had not been the feeling of Parliament, and Mi nisters had never expressed or indeed entertained such an intention. True it was, they wished tc effect beneficial reforms in the church, but those reforms would render it more permanent and less burdensome.—(Cheers.) The Government had been warned to avoid the advice, and reject the assistance of his Right Hon. Friend the Secre tary for the Colonies. Tbat warning. he could assure those from whom it came, he was resolved 'ltogether to disregard. He should be happy at all times to receiv-, with that high respect to which it was entitled, any ad- vice that might come from his Right Hon. Friend, as well as take the banefit of his assistance upon every possi b:e occasion. Mr. SHEIL said, his Honourable and Learned Friend o as perfectly warranted in describing as he had done the measures of the Right Hon. Gentleman opposite, now Se cretary for the Colonies, and formerly Secretary for Ireland. He would put it to the House if every one of those measures had not proved a signal failure ? One of the measures of theßt.Hon.Gentleman went to assign the tithes to the Attorney-General. That, most certainly, had not succeeded ; the money could not be raised from the land ; and as to the present plan, the whole of the aristo cracy would be opposed to it. The plan was an appeal to their pockets, in which they would meet with decided resistance. The House was then called upon to legislate, without being informed what were the designs or plans of Government. It was not too late for the Government to bring forward and to complete the Bank question, or to incur an expense of 20,000,0001. for freedom in the West Indies—was it too late to do justice to Ireland? Mr. SHAW said there had been much misrepresenta tion respecting the state of the established church in Ire land. Thirty ye as ago, nearly one half of the benefices in Ireland were without churches, and without the per formance of divine service. Since then that half had been reduced to one seventh of its original amount; then why not permit that seventh to go the same way as the preceding six parts ? There were two ways, it was said, of meeting the difficulty; one was, to take away the in cumbents, and not to have the service performed ; the other was, to let the incumbents remain, which was that which he tecommended, and to have the service per formed. To pay up the three years' tithes in the manner which had been proposed, was establishing a dangerous precedent, and permitting persons to enjoy impunity who had u&nded against the law. Mr. LAMBERT denied that the Roman Catholics had reedit) , paid their tithes; on the contrary, all the distur bances in Ireland for many years had been occasioned by contests respecting tithes, and all the Insurrection Acts in dieted upon that unhappy country were only consequences of them. As to the mode resorted to for the settlement of the tithe question, at present he could not but look upon it as objectionable in the highest degree. The con duct of the police was most mischievous in Ireland, and no comparison could be drawn between the police there and the police of the metropolis. They were bodies that differed as much as any two bodies could. Colonel CONOLLY rose amid much confusion, and loud cries of " Question !" He agreed with the Hon. and Learned Member in the general principle, that where there was no service done there should be no remunera tion ; but he should be glad to know what services the Hon. and Learned Member had performed to entitle him to receive from the people of Ireland 12,0001. a year.— (Order, and cries of " Oh, oh!") He hoped that the Hon. and Learned Member, in vindication of his own principles, would he prepared to show what services he bad done that money should be extorted in order to pay him.—(Order, and cries of "Hear, and Oh I") He would make no excuse for the expression—the money was ex torted. He had in his possession a card he had received from the county Cork, by which it appeared that there were committees, treasurers, secretaries, and clerks orga nised to extort this money.—(Much confusion, amid which Mr. O'Connell rose once or twice to reply.) Mr. ROE rose to order, and trusted the Right Hon. Gentleman in the Chair would interfere, and not allow the discussion to degenerate into mete personal attacks. The SPEAKER—No one was more sensible than he was to the impropriety of personal attacks being intro duced into the discussions of that House, but he was afraid that it was rather too late in the night, after what had already occurred, to complain of those attacks. Colonel CONOLLY was proceeding to address the House again, when Mr. O'CONNELL had but one word to say in reply. Nothing could be more untrue, than that extortion was employed in collecting the money alluded to. He would, in the strongest terms, consistent with the dignity of that House, deny the charge. Nothing was ever asserted so little liable to credit, as the statement of the Hon. Member. Mr. WALKER was surprised, and saw with regret, that any one should jest upon and treat lightly, as bad been done that evening, the atrocious murder committed by the yeomanry at Newtown Barry.—(" Question," and " Oh !") Mr. BARRON replied. His plan was, to have the working clergy of Ireland paid, and to take away the sinecures enjoyed by those who had no cure of souls. However, when he called to mind the result of the division on the 147th clause the other evening - , he con sidered it useless to divide the House on his resolutions. -- - The resolutions (as we understood, for no question w,.8 put from the Chair) were then withdrawn. Lord ALTHORP begged to state to the House, that, as it was now so late, it would be quite impo.sible to enter into any discussion on the bringing up of the report of the Irish Church Reform Bill, which stood for that night. He would therefore suggest that be might b e allowed to defer the report, and that it should be dis cussed in the morning sitting of Thursday next. The ground of that suggestion was, that private business was nearly at an end—that there were no more election ballots—and that, consequently, there were five mornings in the week now open for the little private business that rt mained to be transacted. As much time as possible should be allowed for public business. NEW HOUSE OF COMMONS. Mr. HUME should quote the opinions of the Com mittee of Inquiry upon the subject, to show that the pre sent House was unfit for the purposes it was intended for. The beat accommodation, be contended, should be afforded to enable them to support the fatigues of their arduous duty. In the discharge of that duty, both be and other Hun. Members had attended in that House sixteen hours a day in an atmosphere anything but congenial to health. Surely no one could be so unwise as to wish to continue such a state of things if any change could be possibly e ff ec t e d. Great difference of opinion prevailed as to the best manner of effecting that change. It was no new thing to wish for an alteration in that House—it bad been desired many years ago, before the Members of the House were increased by an accession of Irish Members, and Government even then thought it necessary to direct the attention of architects to the subject. Yet no change had taken place, though it bad been desired for upwards of a century. When he looked to what had taken place since —to the increased number of Members—tu the great pressure of business, and to the way in which it was transacted—he thought that the Committee had a fair claim upon the attention of the House to the plans . they had to submit to it. There might be some ob- Nctions as to the expense.--(He Jr. ) The estimates that had on a former occasion been submitted to Mr. Speaker Onslow, amounted to 53,0001. ; he trusted, therefore, that when he should show that the present estimates were about half that sum, that the question would not be one that the most rigid economis•s would object to. — (Laughter.) He did not see how they could object to it, after they had seen such large grants voted for the repairs of Windsor Palace, for the pulling down and building tip of Buckingham Palace, upon which at least 600,000/. were already expended. In the present House there was only convenient room fir about 350 Members ; it wag conse quently impossihle that business could be properly trans acted when there were between five and six bundr.d Mem bers present. As an example of the inconvenience of the House, he need only point out what had taken place that evening at five o'clock. The pressure of going out and coining in at that hour was unworthy of any assembly of persons. He repeated, that the shoving out and shoving in that then took place was disgraceful.—(Laughter.) It was fortunate for the Committee that they had the plans that were submitted when the question was before mooted in 1794 —the plan of Sir J. Soane and others. In the Committee very little difference existed as to the necessity of building a new House, the only difficulty was as to the site of it. The great question was, whether the new House should be built in that vicinity, or in the neigh. bourhood of St. James's. Convenience and economy were principally to be studied, and he thought that, as a removal of the House of Commons would in volve a removal of the House of Lords—(Hear, and a laugh)—that the Committee had acted wisely in abantlnn ing the idea of a change of neighbourhood. Every archi tect that bad been consulted, excepting only one, was of opinion that the present House could not be altered, so as to make it y!eld the accommodation and convenience sought for. It was recommended, and in this be con curred, that the 'new House should be built due east of the present House, and the present House might serve as a lobby, or other convenient appendage to the new House, and be of great use in facilitating public business. It would have one great advantage, that of saving time in dividing, as the House might then be emptied by folding doors, and counted in three minutes. It was part of the plan, should the House accede to it, that it should be carried into execution by a responsible Commission, con sisting of five or seven persons; for a Committee of that House could never see it properly carried into effect. He should propose that a sum not less than 35,0001. be placed at the disposal of his Maj sty for the purpose of erecting a new House of Commons. The Hon. Gentleman con • eluded by moving two resolutions, purporting that the ptesent House was inconvenient and unfit for the transac tion of public business, and that an humble Address be presented to his Majesty to order a new House of Com mons to be built ; and that the House would place the sum of 85,000/. in the hands of his Majesty for that purpose. Colonel DAVIES rose to second the first part of the resolution, that he might have an opportunity of opposing the second part. He had seen so much to regret in the House, that he was ashamed of its proceedings. Hon. Members were in the habit of talking, snoring, and lying about—(No, no)—in a most disgraceful manner, all of which he thought was occasioned by the want of suffi cient accommodation in the House. He disagreed will the Hon. Member for Middlesex as to building a new House to the east of the present House. He approved of another site for the House of Commons. He maintained that the whole matter should be taken into consideration ; and he contended that there was no site in the whole metropolis more inconvenient than the present site for the great majority of the Members—for all the Members, in deed, except the Members of the Government and the lawyers. He thought that the business ought again to be referred to a Select Committee. He supporaed the first resolution, but should wish to move his own resolution as an amendment on the second resolution of his Hon. Friend. Mr. W. PETER suggested that the plan of Mr. Hopper, which had been so approved of by Mr. Hanbury Tracey, should be adopted, by which would be preserved to the country those walls which he never entered with out experiencing associations of the highest nature con nected with the names of Sydney, Hampden, and Russell. Sir MATTHEW WHITE RIDLEY also thought that the House could be altered according to the plan of his Hon. Friend, Mr. Hanbury Tracey, supported as that was by Mr. H , pper's evidence. He, however, thought the present House was sufficient for all purposes, and he, therefore, objected even to the first resolution of the Hon. Member for Middlesex. He had seen that Hon. Member transact in it a great deal of business for several years, and he was of opinion that the accommodation was sufficient. Mr. WARBURTON said his Hon. Friend had denied that the present House was unfavourable to health. If the Hon. Gentleman attended not to whit oey s iid in that House, but to the real Lowest opinions of Members— (Great laughter)—he would find they all agreed that it was most injurious. It was exceedingly inconvenient for his own part, and he was not the least constant attendant in that House—( Hear)—he was never in it above two hours without undergoing bodily torture. He objected, however, to changing the present site. Lord ALTHORP thought it wrong to attribute to the House of Commons that ill health which arose from late hours and constant attendance.—( Hear ) No doubt there was great inconvenience when any very large number of Members attended, but as this was not frequently the case, it was a question whether an increase in the size of the Honse would not, under ordinary circumstances, lead to an increase of noise. —(Hear.) He believed that the business could be conducted with satisfaction to the country in the present House of Commons ; but at the same time, if it were the opinion of the majority of the House that there should be an alteration, he had no objection. He should vo'e against the motion. Mr. MILDMAY rose amidst cries of " Question." He contended that if there were to he a change, they would find it necessary to erect a new House of Commons, for the present building could not be properly altered. Sir GEORGE PHILLIPS thought the present House was not sufficiently large for the accommodation of the Members. Sir ROBERT PEEL would not consent to condemn the present House of Commons on so imperfect a report. The report of the Committee appointed to consider this subject—he knew not who the Chairman was, and he meant no disrespect to him—was most imperfect and dis creditable. They bad not recommended any plan to the adoption of the House, but had referred then► to 22, with out coming to any recommendation.—(Hear, hear.) It was most unjust to lay all the faults of the Members on the building. It appeared that there was a great deal of talking, incessant llu, much coughing, and very ungrace ful attitudes, but, of course, as they were the mister spirits of the age, the House of Commons and ❑ot the Members must hear the blame.—(Hear, hear.) It was very questionable whether a large House of Commons would, on the whole, be more advantageous than one of the present size. The proposal to remove to St. James's was most objectionable. What was to be done with the House of Lords, with which they were in daily communi cation?—what with their Committee rooms ?—and what an interruption to business would be the removal horn the Speaker's House and other public offices.—(Hear, bear.) He could not, therefore, agree to the motion. Mr. HUME had reason to complain of the unjust criticisms of the Right Hon. Baronet (Sir R. Peel). He might be a very good critic of words, but his criticism to night was not worthy of any gentleman who pretended to be a British senator.—(Hear, hear.) The observations of the Hon. Baronet (Sir R. Peel) were, in his opinion, quite childish, for in fact he bad not read the evidence adduced before the Committee who were appointed to consider this subject. Sneers and laughs could not pre vail against the common sense of any man who knew his duty in that House.—(Hear.) The public bad necessa rily an interest in this subject, and in bringing it forward he bad only discharged his duty. Criticisms without end might be urged against him, but in all cases he would dis charge his duty.--(Cries of " Question," and "Divide.") After a short conversation, the House divided, wh en there appeared— For the Motion Against it Majority against the motion 64 The other orders of the day were then disposed of, and the House adjourned at a quarter-past two o'clock. On Friday se'nnight an oyster-dealer named liwaas, of Sittingbourne, attended Maidstone fair wi t h some oysters in a cart, together with a fine dog, li e gave the deg a piece of meat for his dinner, and then at tetoptrd to take it ft om him agiin. The dog, no doubt feeling that be had a " vested right" in the said meat after it had been legally conveyed to him, growled a very earnest protest, but being disregarded—he followed the example of Lieutenant Randolph and took his president by tie nose. Hobbs seized the dog and choked him off, just in time to prevent the perfect separation of his unfortunate proboscis. The bystanders advised him to kill the dog. " No," said Hobbs with creditab:e humanity, "he is a good and faith ful dog, and would protect me and my property any where— so I won't hurt a hair on him, be knowed the meat was his'n." He then procured the assistance of a surgeon, who gathered up the fragments in a workmanlike man ner, and poor Hobbs is now going about literally " with his nose in a sliug.".--.Maidst"e Gazette. Immo. COLONIAL SLAVERY. THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON'S PROTEST. Protest against agreeing to the proposed amendment to the sth resolution of the House of Commons on Colonial Slavery. Dissentient, Ist. Because it must be supposed that any system of moral and religious education proposed by his Majesty's Government must be founded upon principles sufficiently liberal and com prehensive to insure the improvement and permanent welfare of the negro population. 2d. Because the insertion of the words " upon liberal and comprehensive principles," in the sth resolution, which words were not in the resolution when first proposed to Parliament, is calculated to create a feeling in the colonies that it is intended to employ in the religious and moral education of the negro population classes of persons whom the proprietors and other free inhabitants of the colonies regard with apprehension and distrust, and:ofwhose conduct they think that they have reason to complain. 3d. Because such feeling is calculated to prevent the suc cessful attainment of the object of the first resolution, which depends upon the consent of the Colonial Legislatures, and upon the cordial co-operation and assistance of the proprietors and colonists at large in the measures intended to be adopted. WELLINGTON. Between the 27th June and Ist July the following signatures were added to this protest, pursuant to the special leave given fur such purpose by the House of Lords:— ERNEST. CAMDEN. SALISBURY. DARTMOUTH. ROSSLYN. BROWNLOW. KENYON. WALLACE. GORDON. I'ENSHURST. ELLENBOROUGH. VANE. MELROS. SANDWICH. SALTERSFORD. HAY. BANK CHARTER. and NATIONAL DEBT. MIN O . On Lord Althorp's .2d resolu the Bank Charter, which legal tender. .RITY tion relative to:the:renewal of make bank-notes above 5/. a ENGLAND. Aglionby, H. A.—Cockermouth Andover, Visc.—Malmesbury Astley. Sir Jacob—WestNorfolk Baillie, J. E.—Bristol Bainbridge, E. T.—Taunton Bell, M.—South Northumberld. Berkeley, C. F —Cheltenham Bewes, 'l' —Plymouth Bethell, R.—East Yorkshire Bolling, W.—Bolton-le-Moors Bowes, John—South Durham Brocklehurst, J.—Maclesfield Brotherton, J.—Salford Briggs, R.—Halifax Buckingham, J. S.—Sheffield Buller, Charles—Liskeard Buller, J. W.—Exeter Bulwer, H. L.—Coventry Butler, Hon. P.—Kilkenny Co. Calcraft, J. H.—Wareham Calley, T.—Cricklade Cartwright, W. R.—South Nor. Lewis, T. F.—Radnorshire Lister, E. Cunliffe—Bradford Locke, W.—Devizes Lloyd, J. H.—Stockport Martin, J.—Tewkesbury Molesworth, Sir William—East Cornwall Morrison, J.—lpswich Ord, W. H.—Newport, Isle of Wight Parker, Sir H.—West Suffolk Peel, Sir R.—Tamworth Potter. Richard—Wigan Philips, Sir G.—South Warwick- . . shire Philips, M.—Manchester Powell, Colonel—Cardiganshire Palmer, R—Berkshire Pigot, ft.—Bridgewater Plumptre, J —East Kent Pryse, P.—Cardigan Ramsden, J. C.—Mallow Rick ford, W.—Aylesbury Ridley, Sir M. W.—Newcastle. upon-Tyne Sandon, Lord—Liverpool Sanford, E. A.—West Somer. tharni;torishire Chaplin, I'. —Stamford Chaytor, Sir W.—Sunderland Chaytor, W. E. C.—Durham Cooker, I'. H.—East Worces- tershire Clay, %V.—Tower Hamlets Chapman, A.—Whitby Clive, Viscount—Ludlow Clive, H. H.--South Shropshire Clive, Edward B.—Hereford Cornish, James—Totness Dawson, E.--South Leicestersh. Darlington, E ar l of—South setshire Sanderson, R.—Colchester Sheppard, T.—Frome Stanley, E.—West Cumberland Stewart, John—Lymington Stormont, Viscount—Norwich Strutt, E.—Derby Thicknesse, R.—Wigan Todd, J. Ruddell—Honiton Torrens, R.—Bolton Turner, W.—Blackburn Trelawney, W. L. S.—East Cornwall Tyrell, C.—West Suffolk Vernon, G. H.—East Retford Walker, IL—Bury Walter, John —Berks Warburton, H.—Br idport Wason, R.—lpswich Welby, G. E.—Grantham Whalley, Sir S.—Marylebone Whitmore, T. C.—Bridgenorth Wilks, J.—Boston Williamson, Sir H —North Dur ham Williams, G.—Ashton Willoughby, Sir H. P.—New ca-tle-under-Lyne Wood, G. W.—S. Lancashire Wrottacy, Sir J.—South Sta. fordshire Wynn, Sir W. W. —Denbigh shire Wynn, Right Hon. C. W. W.— Montgomeryshire Shropshire Dare, a. W. H.—South Essex Denison, J. E.—South Notting- hamshire Duncombe, Hon. W.—North Yorkshire Duffield, T.—Abingdon Egerton, W. T.—NorthCheshire Ellis, W.—Leicester Evans, W.—Leicester Ewart, W.—Liverpool Faithful], G.—Brighton Fancourt, Major.—Barnstaple FeHowes, N.—North Devon FeHowes, H. A. W.—Andover Fenton, John—Rochdale Fielden, W. J.—Blackburn Fielden, 34:m—Oldham Forester, G. C. W.—Wenlock Forster, C. Fryer, R.—Wolverhampton Gaskell, D.—Wakefield Gaskell, J. M.—Wenlock Gladstone,W.E.—Newark-upon- Trent Grimston, ViSC.—Hertfordshire Grote, Geo. —London Guest, J. J.—Merthyr Tydvil Hall, Benjamin—Monmouth Hardy, John—Bradford Halford, Henry—South Leices tershire • Handley, Wm. F.—Newark upon-Trent Hanmer, Sir J.—Shrewsbury Heathcoat, J —Tiverton Herries, J. C.—Harwich Hawkins, J. H.—Newport, Isle of Wight Herbert, Hon. S.—South Wilts Hodgson, J.—Newcastle-upon- Tyne Hope H. T.—Oloucester Hughes, Hughes—Oxford Hume, J.—Middlesex Howard, P. H.—Carlisle Ingilby, Sir W. A.—Parts of Lindsey, Lincolnshire Irton, John—Cumberland James, W.—Carlisle Jervis, J.—Chester King, E. B.—Warwick Lambton, H.—North Durham Lefroy, A.—Langford Lefroy, Dr.—Dublin University SCOTLAND. Parnell, Sir H.—Dundee Wallace, R.—Greenock IRELAND. Baldwin, Dr.—Cork City Barry, S.—Cork Co. Blake, M. J.—Galway Co. Castlereagh, Visc.—Down Coote, Sir C.—Queen's Co. Daly, James—Galway Co. Finn, W. F —Kilkenny Galway, J. M.—Waterford Co. Gladstone, T.—Portarlington Hayes, Sir E.—Donegal Jcpk-saon, D. 0.--1't0.11..".• , 'Brien, Cornelius—Clare O'Conner Don—Roscommon O'Dwyer, A. C.—Drogheda Roe, James—Cashel Ronayne, D.—Clonmell Ruthvcn, Ed.—Kildare Sullivan, Richard —Kilkenny Vigors, N. C.—Carlow Young, J.—Cavan TELLER. Ross, C.—Northampton LIST OF THE MAJORITY. Of 59 (Tellers included) who, on the 2d of July, voted against, and the Minority of 40 who voted for, the mo tion of Mr. Buckingham for a Select Committee to con sider the practicability of progressively reducing the National Debt, by its conversion into terminable annu ities, at gradually diminishing rates of interest, so as to lessen its burden every year, and to determine the best mode of assessing the property and income of the kingdom to meet the expense of such conversion ; and to form at the same time a surplus revenue fund, which shall enable the Parliament progressively to repeal those imposts which bear most heavily on the agricul tural, manufacturing, and shipping interests of the Country. For the Motion , Against it Majorit; In the House .• MAJ 40 59 --19 Shawe, R. N.—East Suffolk Tracy, C. H.—Tewkesbury Trelawny, W. L. S.—Cornwall Turner, W.—Blackburn Tower, C. T.—Harwich Tancred, H. W. —Banbury Vivian, Sir R. H.—Truro Walker, R.—Bury, Lancashire Walter, John—Berkshire Whalley, Sir S.—Marylebone Wood, G. W.—Lancashire Wigney, I. N. —Brighton Wedgewood, J.—Stoke ENGLAND. Anson, Hon. G.—Gt.Yarmouth Bouverie, D. P.—Salisbury Buller, E.—North Staffbrdshire Bolling, W.—Bolton-le-Moors Barnard, E. G.—Greenwich Baring, F. T.—Portsmouth Brodie, W. 8.---New Sarum Clayton, Col.—Marlow Crawley, S.—Bedford L W.—Glamorgansh. Ewart W.—Liverpool Faithful, George—Brighton fironow, Capt.—Stafford Graham, Sir J.—East Cumber. land Goring, H. D.—New Shoreham Janaeq, W.—Carlisle Kerry, Earl of—Caine Littleton, E. J.—South Stafford. shire Lamont, Norman—Wells Leech, J.—West Surrey Mildmay, P. St. J —Winchester Ord, W. H. —Newport, Is le of W Price, Sir R.—Herefordshire Pendarves, E. W. W.—West Cornwall Plumptre, J. P.—East Kent Potter, R.—Wigan Stanley, Hon. E. G. S.—North Lancashire Stanley, E.—West Cumberland Sandford, E. A.—West Somerset MIN 0 SCOTLAND. Fergusson, R. C.--Kirkcud bright Johnston, A.—St. Andrews Marjoribanks,C.—Berwickshire IRELAND. Barron, P.—Waterford City Baldwin, Dr. H.—Cork City Clements, Visc.—Leitrim Co. Chapman, M.—Westmeath Fitzsimon, N.—King's Co. Gladstone, T.—Portarlington Lambert, H.—Wexford Co. Martin, T.—Galway Co. Talbot, J.—Athlone TELLERS. Baring, F.—Thetford Kennedy, T. F.—Ayr, &c. , RIT Y. Torrens, R.—Bolton Wood, Alderman—London Williams, G.—Ashton Wilks, John—Boston Young, G. F.—Tynemouth ENGLAND. Aglionby, A.—Cockermouth Beauclerk, Aubrey Wm.—East Surrey Cobbett, Willldham Cornish, James— m Totness Chichester, J. P. B.—Barnstaple Evans, Win. De Lacy—West. mins Cr Fenton, J.—Rochdale Fryer, R.—Wolverhampton Fielden, John—Oldham Gully, John —Pontefract Guest, J. J.—Merthyr Tydvil Hume, Joseph—Middlesex Hughes, Hughes—Oxford Humphery, John—Southwark Jervis John—Chester Lloyd, John —Stockport Philips, M.—Manchester Pease, Joseph—South Duaham R oe buck, J. ABath Romilly, J.—Bridport Richards, J.—Knaresborough SCOTLAND. Maxwell, J.—Lanarkshire Maxwell, Sir John—Paisley Oswald, Richard—Ayrshire IRELAND, Butler, Hon. P.—Kilkenny Co, Copeland, Alderman Fitzsimon, C.—Dublin Co. O'Connor, Feargus—Cork Co. O'Connell, Daniel—Dublin O'Dwyer, A. C.—Drogheda Roche, David—Limerick Roe, James—Cashell TELLERS. Buckingham, J. S.—Sheffield Harvey, 11. W.--Colchester Mr. J. Grattan's name was inserted by mistake in the list of the majority on the resolution for making Bank of England notes a legal tender, which appeared in The Sun of yesterday, he pa i re d o ff against it with Mr . . Lynch. Mr. Charles A. Walker's name should not have been inserted in the list of the minority. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. IPSWICH RACES, sluzr 2. The King's Plate of 100 gs. Lord Burlington's Mouse 4 yrs 1 1 Lord Clarendon's Datura, 4 yrs 3 2 Lord Berners' Rotterdam, 6 yrs. The Members' Plate of 50/. Mr. Coleman's Dr. Sewell Mr. Cobbold's Ringdove Lord Berners' Tippitywitchet Mr. Boyce's Solitaire 4 4 4 dr jr. Fierson's Nonsuit FASHIONABLE INTELLIGENCE. ARRIVALS. Lord Carberry, at Ellis's Hotel, St. James's.street, from his seat Laxton Hall, Warnsford ; Lord and Lady Dover, at Whitehall, from Roehampton; Charles Lyne Stephens, Esq., in Portman-square, from his seat, Chicksand's Priory, Bedford. shire; Sir Robert and Lady Holland, at Thomas's Hotel, Berkeley-square, from their seat, near Ipswich ; Mr. and Mrs. Pulland and Mr. Lawless, at Crawley's Hotel, Albemarle. street, from Dublin ; William Rathbone, Esq., Robert Harvey, Esq , and - White, Esq., at Morley's Hotel, Trafalgar square, from Liverpool; Thomas Wilson, Esq., and George Roe, Esq., at ditto, from Dublin ; Rev. J. Lynes and family, at ditto, from Dorsetshire ; M. Quetelet, at ditto, from Cam bridge; Rev. John and Mrs. Lyr.es, at the St. James's Hotel, Jermyn-street, from Birmingham; General Thornton, at ditto, from Jersey ; Captain and Lady Catherine and Miss Brecknell, at the Clarendon Hotel, Bond.street, from Btackbrook Park, Monmouthshire; Colonel Stewart, at the Albion Hotel, Cock spur-street, from Portsmouth; J. Ellis, Esq., at ditto, from Manchester; - Booth, Esq, at ditto, from Liverpool; Marquis Boyle (from Sardinia), at the Coburg Hotel, Charles street, Grosvenor-square, from a tour in the North; Sir John Stuart Hippisley, in Grosvenor-square ; Viscount Allen, in Mount-street; Admiral Sir John Beresford, from Sheerness; Major-General Sir Benjamin D'Urban and suite, from Deme rara ; R. N. Shawe, Esq., M.P., in Wigmore-street ; Lord Hill, at Westbourne House, from Windsor Castle; Mr. Charles Mills, at Camelford House; Hon. Major-General Sir Robert Dundas, at the Hon. Admiral Dundas's, in the Admiralty; S. Duncombe, Eaq., in Arlington street. DEPARTURES. The Duke and Duchess of Sutherland and suite, from Staf. ford House, by steam.boat, for Dunrobin Castle, N.B. ; Lord Frederick Fitzclarence, from Eaton-place, for Portsmouth ; Earl Howe, from Curzon House, South Audley.street, for Windsor Castle; Lady Brook Pechell, from the Admiralty on a visit to the Dowager Lady, at Hampton Court Palace; Sir Thomas and Lady Sabine Pasley, for Rydal, Westmoreland ; Lieut.-Col. Stisted, for Ipswich ; Sir Brook Taylor, from Glou cester Lodge, Regent's-park, on a continental tour; Hon. Cot Lincoln Stanhope, for Roeharapton ; Sir A. Malet, Bart., for West Binham, Herts ; the Archbishop of York and Miss Harcourt, from Grosvenor-square, for Nuneham Park ; Sir John and Lady Conroy, from Kensington, for the Isle of Wight; Hon. Captain and Mrs. Villiers, from Viscountess Keith's, in Piccadilly, for Windsor ; G. W. St. John, Esq., from Albemarle-street, for Algiers ; Mr. and Mrs. Fox Talbot, from Sackville-street, on a continental tour; Lord Churchill, for his seat in Oxfordshire ; Lord George Beresford, for the Continent ; T. W. Coke, Esq., and Lady Ann Coke and family, from Grove House, Old Brompton, for their seat, Holkham- Hall, Norfolk; Cot R. H. Cooke, for Sandy, Norfolk; Admi. ral Sir P. Brooke, of Brooke Hall, Ipswich; Col. and Mrs.Rush brooke and family, for Rushbrooke Park, Suffolk ; Mr. and Mrs. Davis, from the Brunswick Hotel, Jermyn-street, for their seat in Wales; T. A. Smith, Esq., for his seat, Tidworth, near Andover; Sir Thomas, Lady, and Miss Acland, from War. ren's Hotel, Regent-street, for their seat in Somersetshire ; Mrs. Barker, from ditto, for Cambridge; Mr., Mrs., and Miss Buck, from Ellis's Hotel, St. James's-street, for Ryde, Isle of Wight; Mr. and Mrs. George Morant and family, from ditto, for their seat, Farnborough Park, Bagshot ; Mrs. Birch and Son, from the Pulteney Hotel, Albemarle-street, for Paris; Sir Edward and Lady Blackett and family, for their seat, near Newcastle-upon-Tyne; E. J. Cooper, Esq., M.P., from the Waterloo Hotel, Jermyn-street, for his seat, Montree Cas. tle, Ireland ; Mr. and Mrs. Clealand, from ditto, for Dublin ; Mr. and Mrs. Barrington Price, from ditto, for Brighton ; George Cash, from the Albion Hotel, Cockspur.street, for Cheltenham; Cot Vernon Graham, from ditto, for Antwerp; Captain Goold, from ditto, for Ireland; Captain Ramsdell, from ditto, for Chatham. SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE-(THIS DAY) FROM LLOYD'S. DEAL, Jun' 2.—Wind S. W., moderate.—Arrived the Ca therine Stewart, Forbes, from Van Diemen's Land, sailed 11th of February ; Craignon, Ray, from Sydney, New South Wales, sailed 14th February; and Caroline, Campbell. from Jamaica. Arrived from the river and sailed, with the outward bound, the Royal George, Wilson, for Bombay. POSTSMOUTtI, JULY 2.—Wind W. to S.W.—Arrived the Montreal, Champlin, from London, and sailed for New York. Sailed the Sir Edward Paget, Tucker, and the Marquis of Hastings, for Bombay. PLYMOUTH, JULY 1.-Wind S.W. to N.W.—Arrived the REinard, Goss, from Marseilles. FALMOUTH, JULY l.—Wind W.S. W., to W.N.W., fresh breezes.—Arrived the Arethusa, Simons, from Naples. Sailed the outward bound. STANGATE CREEK, JULY 2.—Arrived the Emma, Crow, from Smyrna. M►RG►TE, JULY 2.—Arrived the William Lushington, Saghrue, from St. Kitts. _ _ ... . COWES, JULY 2.—Arrived the Diaria, Sugden, from Ha vannah. TORBAY, JULY I —Arrived the Heiress, Morrish, from Mogadore ; and Anne and Maria, Shears, from Faro. BRISTOL, JULY 2.—Arrived the Hercules, Cherry, from An tigua ; and Cloudslin, Roach, from Newfoundland. MILFORD, JULY I.—Arrived the Blawsworth, Nesbitt, from Newport, leaky, and cargo shifted ; bound to London. LIYRRPOOL, JULY L—Arrived the Voluna, Greeve, from New Orleans ; Jupiter, Byte, from St. John's, New Bruns. , ...a Cnneo.dia , Yuaolcallor, from Tarragona. Off port, the Lee, Scott, from Barbadoes ; and Marshal, Macdonald, from New Orleans. DUBLIN, JULY I.—Arrived the Celt, Munro, from Deme rara ; Thorney Close, Cooper, from St. Andrew's, New Bruns.. wick ; and Time, Hobbs, from Smyrna. COMA, JUNE 30.—Arrived the Good Hope, Skynner, from St. John's, New Brunswick ; Reliance, Walters, from Leg. horn; and the Msabeth Frith, Briard, from Liverpool, lost bowsprit topmast, bound to Boston. BELFAST, JUNE 30.—Arrived the Morning Star, and the Mary Ann, Everett, from St. Andrew's, New Brunswick. The Jean Brown, from Riga to Bredport, put into Christian sand, leaky. Arrived at Newfoundland the Lady Francis, Dawe, from Hamburg. The ➢fercy, from Barbadoes, is supposed to be arrived of Brighton. LONDON SESSIONS.-(THIS DAY.) The London Quarterly Sessions commenced this morning, at ten o'clock, in the Guildhall of the City of London, before the Lord Mayor, the Hon. Charles Ewan Law (the newly-ap pointed Recorder), the Sherifft, and usual City officers. On the Recorder taking his seat he was highly complimented by the Bar on his new appointment. After swearing in the Grand Jury, the Clerk read over the Riot Act and the King's Proclamation. The RECORDER then rose, and addressed the Grand Jury as follows :—Gentlemen—This is the first time I have had the honour of addressing you in my present situation. I need not observe to you the great duty you have to perform as Jury men. lam happy to state that the London Calendar for the ensuing Old Bailey Sessions does not present any cases of a very aggravated nature. The Calendar contains charges of lar ceny, counterfeiting coin, and other cases of less importance. Perhaps some cases of perjury may come before you, and I hope you will act with that caution you have ever evinced before you find the parties guilty. The Learned Gentleman then proceeded to extol the benefits of Trial by Jury. The Grand Jury was requested to attend to.morrow morning at 10 o'clock, in the Justice room of the Old Bailey. A Petty Jury was afterwards sworn in. Samuel Helder, who was found guilty last sessions for keep ing a house of ill-fame in Black Horse-court, Fleet-street, and on whom sentence was not passed, was brought up for judg ment. It appeared that he had not closed the house as he had promised, and the nuisance existed as late as the lath to the 20th of June. He was sentenced to three months' hard labour in the House of Correction. This was the only case. OLD BAILEY. THE ENS UL PG SESSIONS. A SUMMARY STATEMENT, DESCRIPTIVE OF THE VARIOUS OFFENCES WITH WHICH THE PRISONERS SEVERALLY STAND CHARGED. Burglary 3 iHaving Counterfeit Coin in Housebreaking 9l possession 2 Highway robbery Stealing in dwelling-houses 13 Horse-snaiing 2 St ea ling from the person ... 34 Manslaughter ....• 2 Receiving stolen goods 5 Bigamy 1 Embezzlement 1 Uttering a Forged Order Larcenies 65 for Payment 2 Cutting a nd maiming 4 Uttering Counterfeit Coin 1 Bestiality Forgery 2 Assault Total 152 Of the above number, 50 are charged with crimes committed in the City, and 103 in the County. The following is a comparative statement of the , respective ages of the alleged offenders : Above 10 0 years, and under 2 20 30 67 50 40 24 5U 60 5 70 Total 153 STATE OF lIIS MAJESTY'S GAOL OF NEWGATZ, MADE UP TO TUESDAY EVENING. Prisoners under sentence of death 24 Prisoners under sentence of transportation for life 14 years ....... 18 7 years Ditto, sentenced to various terms of imprisonment, having 7 been convicted of felony, &c. Ditto, for trial at the ensuing Sessions ------,-, -- Ad mira lty Sessions 4 Ditto, remanded from the last Sessions 1 Ditto, acquitted on the ground of insanity, but remain dur ing Royal pleasure 4 Ditto, capitally convicted, but whose judgments have been respited during Royal pleasure 2 Ditto, acquitted and detained j Males 233 I Females 9B I Total 33. Th e national revenue of the current quarter has been much increased by the report of the augmented duty on West India sugars. Great part of the sugar warehoused in this port has been withdrawn, and duty paid.—. Limerick Chronicle. .04.00.31. PRICES OF SHARES THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK. Paid. Per Share. Anglo Mex. Min. Co. (iss. at 51. pm.) XlOO 11% Bolanos Mining Company .£l5O 137% Brazilian Imp. Min. Co. (ss. at 51. pm ) £2O 61 ' Ditto National 17% 23 Ditto St. John Del Rey Ditto Cocaes 5 15s. British Iron Mining Company £5O 19 Columbian Mining Co. (iss. at 5/. pm.) 50% 94 English Mining Company 12% 21% General Mining Association l2 8% Mexican Mining Co. £46 36"4 711 Real del Monte Mining C 0...., — United Mex. Min. Co. (iss. at 21. M.) 40 114 Ditto New Scrip 5 14 Alliance Fire Insurance Comp. ...... Protector Insurance Comp. Australian Co. Canada Company General Steam Navigation C 0... ..... -1 12 National Provincial Bank of England f Provincial Bank of Ireland 25 354! cobitai off i n c , doubt m fir. BUC lOjntmen prai into to Ly and ii ;the exi ne time, 5111 d ena Bch beat tnufactur army. a major 3CKINGI nsidering , express all Hoi ye chos, .her, inst an) ► e Holy ion the iestion, I 'higs, 11 nple pr( an for its eet with ?n of tl • , averting .the mt )ject in N Mr. Buc ringing fi ittee, we shouh lime the nt. annu jection 1 ration. the ini coition is fight, w i t able t, lola of so disc [r. Buci 8 plan, Fording 'ion. ioney ma hrour ; b antage o )terest of great lII] lycKi NG 111 be ac ixation EAST INDIA HOUSE, JULY 1, 1833. THE COURT of DIRECTORS of the UNITED COMPANY of MERCHANTS of ENGLAND, TRADING to the EAST INDIES, do hereby give Notice, That a GENERAL COURT of the said COMPANY will be held at their House in Leadenhall-street, on Far- DAY next, the sth instant, at Eleven o'clock in the fore noon, for the purpose of laying before the Proprietors a Bill which has been introduced into the House of Cots• mons, entitled " A Bill for effecting an arrangement with the India Company, and for the better government of his Majesty's Indian territories." The said Bill is now printing, and will be ready to be delivered to the Proprietors at this House on WEDNESDAV NEXT, at Ten o'clock. id we de t sum s We an Mr. E up ni flether g undoub irness ar ; and x of an a unten ray, that ry for a ortional hould pa gradual ut of pr ( lstanee, tnd, pay fir that nn uit s i i dditiona' iroportio 10 i n j usti ° say an 'us as B "eh pr acn e pr o much z (ustrious hts deti ng to c may h, lerty ta X :heck the o ch ec k produi !ho live atal to t i The House of Commons decided last night, )rop erty by a majority of 154 to 70, that it would not ip of th accede to two resolutions brought forward by lothin g , Mr. HumE, declaring that the House did not t afford sufficient accommodation for its Mem- rinaLY so Almat we hers, and praying his MAJESTY to give direc , . iccumitiL tions for building a new one. Lord ALTHORr interest i opposed the proposition, because he did not one hu ri , think the obstruction of public business so great first. Save a as to call for a new building, but at the same is n time said, that he had no strong opinion upon they the point. Many Members who do not feel the ave see inconveniences of the House, only coming in )os e d h late in the evening to divide voted with his 1/1,.. co Lordship. Others with strong ConservatiVe 21 early b feelings opposed any change of the locality of we rani the debates because it was a change. This was the ;Peed). ground of Sir It. PEEL'S opposition the year be- ) :: o Perty fore last, when Col. TRENCH brought the matter he N 0 1) .eation. forward. Others have reasons for opposing the s 1 ,000 a( erection of a new building of a most curious h e state nature. For instance, Mr. PETER said, that he oppo: he was averse from building a new House at 1 40 p rof the cost of the loss of all the recollections and leavy ht. associations connected with that in which they eft th e :r em now sat, and which in his opinion were such as presen t no conveniences or accommodation could corn- bank si pensate." The recollections and associations legacy a connected with the spot in which no good but if a measure has been adopted, not forced a milli oi upon the House by public opinion ! The of duty. recollections and associations connected with Lord A the servility of the sixteenth century, and will wi s the corruption of the 17th and 18th ! The 11 0 n. rise of the House of Commons from its state Of have o b debasement is due to the people and not to the t o del creatures of the rotten borough oligarchy, who off the so long sacrificed all the best interests of the " 1 0nel country to their own miserable selfishness. Isi; of th e for the sake. of the associations connected with 01 )servb the days of WALPOLE, Of PITT, Or men ll ol REAGH, that Mr. PETER iS so anxious to vot e 01 s p ol in the den in which they perpetrated q uestio their deeds ? If he says that it is for the merely sake of the associations connected with the Re- To hri form Act, or any preceding measure of justice, would he should recollect that those associations would tion th; be rendered much more vivid by the circurn - w;a_.l ( l stance of having to pass through the old house Coinnti into die new one, proposed to be built beyond Will b, it. It is useless to discuss the question now ; hav e a but when Members have been obliged by their to in , constituents to attend a little more punctually PETER AUBER, Secretary. A REWARD of 201. is hereby offered for the earliest INFORMATION to Messrs. ALEX ANDER, GEM, and POOLEY, Solicitors, 36. Carey. street, London ; or to Mr. JOHN HENNING, At torney, Weymouth, of the RESIDENCE of Mr. JOHN LAWRENCE, late of Dorsetahire, land-jobber, which shall lead to his arrest at the suit of the said John Henning, to be paid on such arrest. The said John Lawrence is about 50 years of ager height about 5 feet 11 inches, well proportioned, cow• plexion somewhat sallow, hair dark brown, eyes rather small, face roundish, voice shrill and drawling, walks ups right and consequential, and assumes the character and dress of a Quaker (except the hat). During the years 1829, 1830, and 1831, he made souse considerable purchases of lands and houses at Blandford and near Weymouth, in Dorsetshire, and at Yeovil, in Sotroarsetshire, and contrived to get into possession, a nd he has lately been successful in a similar way at Pinner, near Harrow, it is understood. C *it „it, LONDON, WEDNESDAY EVENING, JULY 3, 1833. PRICER Or ' , TDCKS THIS DAY AT ON , O'CLOCK. Bank Stock - 3 per Cent. Red. ...99 8% 9 8% India Stock -. 3 ner gent Cons. 3 per Cent.... 96 57i South Sea :.-tock ..... ...... 1 1 94„ Ditto Red 964 5S Old Annuities 86% New 3% per Cent- ... ..... shut New Ditt0...... ...... - I 1 er Cent. Ann. 1726 ....- .-- 3 per Cent. Ann. 1751 -- 4 per Cent. 182(1 1023 % Ex. Rills, Xl,OOO-54 53 54 on'. Rank Long Ann to exm re Ditto.-- ..... .500...54 53 54 pm, _'Jan. 5, 186'' 19 1-16 17 Ditto Small 54 53 54 or - . . I Oct. 10, 1854 1 —, Ditto Commercial ..... ....-- pm. Jan 5, 1860 — %Ditto Advertised pm.' Jan. 5, 1880 — Bank for Account -- Aprils, 1880 lndia for Account Jan. 5, 1870 Cons. rni• Opening 90 1 ,4 89 PRICES OF FOREIGN FUNDS Austrian Bonds 96% Belgian Bonds Ditto Account 91 3 4% Brazilian Bonds 673 i THIS DAY AT ONR 0 CLOCK. Peruvian Bonds I9X Portuguese Bonds Ditto Account 5914. S Ditto Account 67% 3 ;1 Buenos Ayres Bonds 23 ' Regency Scrip Ditto Account midis.. Prussian Bonds — Ditto Bonds, 1822 103% Russian Bonds, 1V22 lO4 Ditto Account. 104% New Loan 9 , 156 Spanish Bonds, 1821 18;4 18 Ditto Account...lB% %% % 1 3 Ditto B on d s, 82 16 Ditto Account 23 Chilian Bonds Ditto Account 25 , 4 Columbian Bowls Ditto Account Ditto Bonds, 1824 22 Ditto Account .254 Danish Bon 3 ' 74 Ditto Aces' nt — Greek Bonds lni Ditto Bonds, 1825 Ditto Account 19 3 / 4 Mexican Bonds, 5 per cent 3O Ditto Account I Ditto Account French Rentes, 5 p. c. —f —c. Exchange —f —c. —S per cent...- —f —c. -- Exchange —f —c. Dutch, 21 p. c. 48► q g ' Ditto Account 48% 56 Ditto, 5 p. c. 904: Ditto Account 90;4% I French Scrip I ;,,; pm. Ditto, fi per cent 37►,4 Ditto Account 17% Neapolitan 92% PRICES OF IRISH WOO Bank Stock Consols, 3 rter cent. Gov. Stock, 3% per cent 95% Ditto, New per Cent Gov. Deb. 3l percent - Royal Canal Stock Grand Canal Stock City Deb. 4 per cent. Ballast office Deb. 4 p. c. 93 COURSE OF EXCHA Amsterdam C.F . 12 31 Ditto, at sight i o ii Rotterdam 2 U 12 33 Antwerp 12 8 Hamburg M.B. )3 15i Altona l3 151 Paris, 3 days' sight 25 85 Ditto 2 U. 26 5 Bordeaux 26 10 Berlin Frank fort on Maine, Ex. M. 154 Petersburgh, ruble, 3 Us. 10 0 Vienna, effective A. 2M. 10 6 Trieste do . 10 8 Madrid. 37 Cadiz 37 Bilboa 36% Barcelona 36% Seville 36% Gibraltar 47 !XS, DUBLIN, JUNE 29. St. Patrick Insur.(perShare) -- Royal Irish Ditto National Ditto Patriotic Ditto Hibernian Bank Provincial Ditto Royal Irish Mine. ....... , Imperial Mine .... . ... !Mining Co. of Ireland Commercial Buildings .NDE YESTERDAY. Leghorn 47% Genoa 26 5 Milan 3l Venice 47 Naples . 39% Palermo per oz. 119 N Lisbon 47 Oporto 48 Rio Janeiro 28 Bahia 31 Buenos Ayres Dublin, 21 days' sight 1 Cork lg BULLION, PER OZ. Z. a. d. Portugal Gold, coin... 0 0 0 Foreign Gold, in bars 3 17 fl New Doubloons 0 0 0 New Dollars Silver bars, standard 0 0 0