The Sun. — London, England, 1833-03-09 00:00:00

itk °l( the O A i' 0 the de o , a f ai Que.tlet o i ie t ,. , it:Nee:lves . 10 _, ?... „(fieft, ti , , not u_efr p ower, a told the farmer ,1 . tat they had his son . „ eteoeserts ;bo lt! : h i. doi e ,r o . .l ~w.oulal shoot him if he did 1 _ le l o 4 oi d err & 144, ll _ el tea, stationedHlC farmer who, with two e 0 laag s riti j oia4 ; e ted it, ~.,. behind the door, im !re tooled t the fur l be Terry-Alts fired, but without ' Ley ; s b it a t i i f ug .sts b rat i i tl nit 4. one of them mer 8 sons returned the fire, and he ir b 0 " e t/ led ' That en ' upon which allay , kie t i ; ittee man was carried to the hospital, from and ) relie ve t "ji t t te > kit "'Pt was to extract some informati e asant Pv eel e i le ' le fath er with out ; and shortly before his on d oneruhoedtbaroci :: zei2„,,,,,ilaeoardinvyghtheacteshse was not likely to recover, Z i t owner ti anta il l . e 'Pil e ;,', terres. en taking i ,l dee • otti.,"%le 61 S on it ' g his last adieu, his only words hard, and die like a man." le %vow" ~,,, "oce o f would per' hold. cove that, with such a system, the %N al ._ a diec,,,,,, iwtrh:iit: 6 1: 0 0 :: di 1 foi o d e to ( lt aysi Was, a, far rY was very slight. But bed as this wtisitelifikiita :thew, it he hfoeunhdade mentioned, there were other ~ bedrive hi prtiegitle:teteezerbyr:Arrieralled, one oe7ruwwallhyombarLwalsfinfouroinnnsetactnicoeu, aAnts, the oth murde as sure to he attacked at uid (flee, ri ' -- o ` ta bo be e i f th e 4e ° to 1,,,,. 'if not This they did, in ma it oica 1 40 at evils of 1 ,""g recourse t h r e ed law, for it was ore the q sod 1 l AN& th e 1 : e Te rrY-Alt ot , system, that it put down the s e in e b e bee) N b ir d u ? --( Hear, hear.) If two persons in the t CO The 'Nat b oth el. society useof corie till y *ere told of them quarrelled, it was almost im clt th e hte)", 'Ott special ity the shmild escape the Terry-Alts. awed iesg bey. 64 I.4btr cum Hon. Members who opposed that le felt thet it ciatoeti, dia l in would put down those .. Pe Y Pit c b,...._ r t _ in King's County, because they hail than fuffeer„ _, d by tbe ' st tie i ti w ut the:ea...ohne disturbances in the County of : i s dange ro Z 41 ,41 by o systernsUen .Members did not keep in view, u d be mere different than those B•i•bad s 1) Piv the riot • t • • d e bt kt I t e nee. tra In three. two counties. In Clare, biret• - ' 4 ;01 k i iY h a d '''' great ' e o ldie' p i the sg a non e of ~numbers, and turned up the land ; Bat be O f l e Lad Which_ Were those organized and secret night , 93 0 re :Thly been 'I Prevalent in Kine's Count• If a hre:g h h ie t h rt .stoltr oe (L e ~ Y meetine,, such a. had taken y. p'aee rag" , eir lith ate* w s - r.. Oxinint i 44 4._ Lord h.. _ (two) had no doubt that the raced 0 t ab s " t. decider:o( Iset k. i Teet t o re. rt e ,, , e been able to so less th. m. hat no ... ~ ~ t "e k oetv 7u,„, martial he saw no difficulty. There mr, fro ': 0 1; 40n ok, tha ; ; i f," the race crewed. and it was necessary to rest deliberation, it appeared to what the fed ? Net ' ifetrtbe4tti""hro h id no other course to pureue Some . aa , .p, Perig ee . denied the existence of any . danger to l t that the t la I embers ad nu king it. t ff. alikyl that utin g or . , 4. ) l'he • ki ltne . mop giving evidence. Why, it could , toe sale; ea aa sei zes 8 _: of the cases of assault tried Pe f. , be e NO 4 Pr oeee act b" committed ril as t a ‘,.._ p qice No te . This on person, who had of course, could not appear ,;,lead the" 1 4 ,7. 11 r 'gietere '. ~,, Hero' 11 , tin I , re ty t Which merely stated effects, not (, . I, . ~. a s another e ; lear d.... ei ~,,, hieli•iolembers had part of the Bill to which e usrir r 're s „, ne e an ,i,, made the strongest objeetione, ,00 ono tg . , ' "et ed eui,e essential to produce the de •srd Pa' t rd rs 0, ' h l' 'lop e d " AO O ._ ~ at th e _ lit be able to sh th - le ha" d 'on, , The u i re o p pos i t . . ••w ose Hon. , _ tie mat 1 , , 1 }IN., 11 „ ~,, e inn to it was ill-founded. T.' is E. :' in li do° ri qtt, 4. ' i n i) e 1)(46 : 3 on t ained in the 1 9th clause. and ....1 At tbi, 17 011 too. o e‘es : muter a Magistrate's warrant , to enter L e, 0 , .i .. fe tril •qid e d i„ Jr.' . the night-time - ( Hear.) It had Ho s „order+, e , 'Pr oce ':"iitectien that I• . ,liiled 644 • , 4,.. 7 ~,, aon e , ta .. tdis power, wl en granted i loch Too , " seise a hid bee. t. a been atrociously abused ; and no __ a . _ .O ~t , _ 4, , nat ure ~ 0 mentioned of a very horrible and to tor ttlu ° he, ' lie had n • )4 fiato og to t N i ts! eod n Buell . 0 wish to deny that there er a a„ st instances of atrocity, but the had e ofa re r s ru P ee pt iii o. P tL eti t h e h le tt int _ Y .111 totally different from: thet which the ira te lie ifo's a 7ca., wi u 'it - et by the Bin . now brought forward. ore t ° " . , t 4 tV ai t 'e t , 'Pe on tie ° fertn„ Insurrection Acts were io force, l d I t re- . 4 ,1 1 '` - 41 0 4 1 1 - Petty sessi on to act as a controlling in- ' 1 __„ 0 „.....( 6 " v et 1 . -^ lti, l , t it r°44 tlnentl ic)ns in not' to t e tt p , i 7oy o r f tepn,,,, tbk, 0 Y the Alagistrates were possessed , in tne P o t tb4,,ald. 44bordina,Pe:verh, and had the aid of a num. - o were in like manner almost , prove °f 41 11i7, 1 41 I : o " c ePt to the Magistrate himself. But the 1 , e F watt l t)I c V?° tilli t Pqr W 6 alt 1 ~,,s and hued 1,,,,,, L. . e , of th ered, for there would be the con ) ettre ibuftk est s tl o ,..ineap ah ,.. e sessions, and the Magistrates ki editei , ',..Zi• ;ite''e of acting by themseivea, and frLfreaa,r o o ai t .i sol tlf 11.114,. wia l e imlict. !ell of the Lieutenant of the , c h e ero., ' 1 151,, Qv . end autos Po, were trained in the hest possi ,io„:., of ..., ,4 Ron. , et to such excellent regulation.. as ....-k 0, On. f ilre o: fro - iber„ r i, i4l:tlo,4ll..tue,i,rize,c,.owrindeu.c.t, and were completely respon . m or, ; °.4 et l :aot o e i t ts,„ by i n.e. e Indeed as regarded the power ,o ,ii tl. te r 1, 6..1 of le i the a _' , h 9 . such a power already existed .. ie t ~,.., N., to a cti an _ "tin , bent of the magisttres, for the 110 i-i t : de d a , ait., tt ' . e . ef aht % e 'n . there could net be produced a sill with . 3 ro ( !!, o th e 'l_Y iktt ,... i. b r e h elix __ resulting from such powers ; and .... 1 ; e PI i t ,: t - T ui 0, i t ;7 . id, any such alma- hail unfortu he ti . i s e fYi Hs tike i l of th ' u ld lie put rat epol l at al. 4 1 11. , ..,,, Ca r o? tki.,klikuuld 1 0 _, __ }stem, uteler which the p lv„"' li i,ta , PI sell,t, tif . ra, n iten 7:ll still more controlled. The lu_' „ , o tot ,h.. e!l ttit 'llitt R., !_ b r for Dublin had challenged any 4rB 6 tio p , ttirmittet, ont use to show that there existed any, the - t' h at ° or° ' or. . a • nretiee between what he called predial ) ' they i • 'go t gnati on ait c ; t . _ ? MI, t t1i,.,, tl ie th,it the. The Hon. and Learned Member ICt, I, lag er r i s e! O at ' . ..lie ot t ::ele of ~ whole of th e disturbances were alto- r p„,, s al t ; t1i, 1 40, 4 el, kid "'e dreadful distress which prevailed and not from agitation. He (iird ctt:b( a t. ' t e s t : I , „kta 4 i.Nlll 4 , i n .! °l -I ' d ate or f% 0 1 t i 4 '44 44 i1°n b etw facts to show that there did een predial and piilitical agitation 'to the °trait' il :‘l l' k te4 a in t th iielo 144 !k it , e denial made by Hon.. Members, it . ice i ll r r t h its h al l a e fl er that an 034 04 t t/ b e,. 1,, e0 to,d tato r at the operations of the Terry 4ty after . soome peat anti-tithe meet jhed "" I ,, P d t ' lt to 4 Pas s as st hel o l eo for to ; , ; , th tti esy titi e i d,. m the the most seditious resolutions . n ie strongest determination evinced ree e n t t. ife f V 11 0 0; f f r i le tli lli t ' ett it t:l l (; l o ; we A ct o bu ther fact to show that the dis had nothing to do with the in , i , a for at t y La tk_N t w _ 4B, that there 0 •t0t c`.,..„ to . , 7 6 °6, 4 _ 0 y,, ars t eie Lad been no tithe outrages Jo fo• - soi , tit!, ', „ ol i t o : 11,,,iruPeratioe'en that county, the clergy having, Eo ll ost o tb; I f..s ilt io 4 0 wtithes° of A the Terry. Alts. declined to col a proof that distress had in dotjeele,olb'e ,tp,',:s it t ",h,he out s • i ! i a . ges in Ireland, it would be 40;1 rept; 'pled •ktyr:fiii,jitetv-",0:t athe.,,.l nit man who had been arrested g aro , str .. , pi. ki t ' l be t ot,'Ylor. Br sides and respectable farmer of pr; ,"tot, h teo t e a Pney beto : li es , there had not been a sin e.... , No i h lt tn ... ~.., taken from any person, though tiled ,p f, r fit a d ad b •:i s a ti e . Ir e l and Proffered. There wa re irotestan; voio rk ee . uur l i n a d r e e t h tb e ,t ; i a l pr i o t o h oe t e ' e : b o uli were in an equal state of de cs, but not a single instance • r ale! aVe t tat o f tl t d of there ore di d . , le T er ere heing a single Protestant in of th e I ; til l 1 41, 4 41 , l 'r p ot ,eY AN. In fact, there remained no tr aricl ei eert ket , t hat tin g dow leetings wi e L t t h,wh t , v a st ,„„_ . n these disturbances ; for it ~...rbon 1., Op :40 8 - : i ews . "5 ''evolutionary petty existed in di .°to a s t_ ml id .. I G ov,, of revolution were not confined to a eilt o n o Id IA pars 4 . ' 4 %, Inment but contemplated aint ibi d A, N I „ at i ,,, of , all the break- Bo ° r itf lie; a.etlidi7areed a . e property.-(Hear, hear.) To co y vi, i t intl er to r qd to ll th , tar a u l u mber for Dublin was looked up , ~_ o ise!, lo , le r _ th.!tidew e.oi did . d conductor of 'he case of this' ;:te'erec of '. 0 iig e Zhe , e !" 11 1 into 8 _ he ewe that power which had _. o eb o 4 , W ith t eals , th „ . successful ; but let them once take rage'titita ri d K e Me 1,',11,1.1 th e n, th‘ a t t their General would not go all ion;,.. ficl.)l, obl.. tOr c i i i %il l! . t o th _ ne would give up the case the ri',. st daf, [ 4 1 4, dy Di vitirk r i ' ground, and cast him off. ' The had t ' n ol 6 lanth "s ' "to by 8 , ,• . 0 , ie j A, . 0f,,, t o t , }mg, that his support would t oil a n, t i e •t, ~ tabli , . rie Bi l l wt • h . , 0 ot, _ t at ,IS 1 1 , 1 (4,,, Ito" 4 . which he considered the the o der / ~it , t iti ll 4 r Al t , iv 6 - curity for life and property in !is c h ,ll; l ; (l ,vidi ' te rl , I , ° 4 P; , r ll , ,y i . : l 4 'e t, t; l tt i}, t l,, t ° t ll l: o 2 , 7,..il the Bill, The preamble of I by 0° e tt p _ l '44: 4R,i, C lo tiq of , r or..eerous con-pit acy was pre hie .400 ~., 4, 8t..t ey .. _ . 1.11t vt, t e Ireland, against the rights of t I I ry 0 ,, f. )a, e r ry , "'4l h _ t tt t. _, was very much at a hiss to un )3 7 1 l b , i i , i ii.,,,.,, 0 :. t o ., Iv h il l r Vl l l4:Clei of properly this dangerous befo re .l, I' 4,•,, 7-er eo .." th e ' except it were that of tithes -a Co ol' . . o bl.l t ee l e ite a , e;e. Present be p eael i o te at, "nigi_ Qi n _ h. preamble proceedings of Ministers at oeir hest tr,. s gill: Of i ll , he, n•xt set forth the rr.i.toie t i , Peeltill.to skim to Ill, di l : tumultuous assemblies of , 0! Pf f a t ed ,_ l O l e a 'cri a P un e,d per-ono, calculated t f a s o ebo nt hi._ , th L 'u.. ol 41 n ,,_ .1 intimidation." New •t to ern g ..ra e 0 - ti !ti . to 'esi 4 ta n , t. 7; the slightest evidence hd i a- " ntei ea. .0. °ti e , thti o",'' B , e 'ote this allegation ,f •' the a been [ ,f et osst ott . 1 1 ai 4l l sod el h.:, On the contrary , Iter.a. ) g ort: 11 . 1. 11 ,11 p 4. 4,411 y Proved the en in three . or ot r of the n,idtand soo t , to jPst e 4 ' 1, ,„ , I existence ids species of Ag ;me of lit y t h„, ,, Q4k "oet i l n .Y unread ground brou ht I ra. orrs' lit 'a es 4,, Of i fl ed in a series of letters g °rward for . ! -1) ,e,tli , is of L.', c o b s 1 - Lo. Secretary for Ireland, who had iat cojo tl i t , ;to,; '" , ) i i .ti , e3 h . , .. , e rii den u c n en ie d n ed , to favour w the House with the ter. te ~,,,,, cr. , „,,,,,,,, . b ,..),,, s. What were the reasons fur i.e , _f i r c , let , %ll! tt tit encealmen , ? There could be but P OP $ 111% t 'se t Y, i f e Virtier were notof eg • I .0 , 4 e t , t h .. 04 „,. , suererit weight r Iry el t to t , ,Of "tl k h - ca, to have produced any effect on f. O i .: e pa t e k fteli i ' ll i c tl,,, 4 tt ? l, e p doi n t o . t_his point he believed that the tha t 'tt 'tni gt 14 f or Hon. Secretary for • i .c .. t ies „, , Id ,hide min _ the concealment, I 0 or ce li ter .- Or I . u.....tc, writer, , on the score of the la 4/ it t 4 , 1 e , ? .,,„, .11, Li l B eers.) Hon. Members on the his "' / 0; 0 'N. ', 41 11 , "OUse c heered ;pis tie, es t i 1. e th. . ered very vehemently , b spy ° so k. , en s ht thf. ow ~,, t'r cheers when lie made hts y' nex u t t .br 'tau 1: ton •", it that ,, , r o e _, d i tt e. li 41. , a ~_ tw e . _. the non. Secretary had c 'r ea d e r. 11 i ii i ttai, 11. 1 ,4 1 : *„ 8 i ' t "ion for the whole of his cor sir , torte t, of n, ti,,,, it et,,i 4,. that when one of then, happer r w e i; Oat ett bed hie toe"t P lirtt dtl 'lrespon 'll t hey 01 ,1, to 4.0 f t ".(itcl I Pers o n.-why was was .t that 1 rin e l Pr. s i ," ei tie, I 'vou r , d o rl HP ? How ; ,d. i r . 4 , ta 'N it Poe ll•iuse with the name of to_ s ib r. u; N. e l ek b , }en that correspondent hap. ok e ve ", ' Rcj ' N t.t' a tti ' 4, w 1 ti0 ,,,0 0 , 44, 4, 7't 04 `‘ t Il i i" , lC e e 'letv ? •ck s j, me a 'all t', ~ ,t ki i v , „,,Y Were private letters ;iin t a p e wi t . 1 . w,0.110),,411, 1 : d oe R i ad to hear the admission that ,1 ,, ,,0, i . i f i r o t o fi li ? bi l . tp, it _lti q i 14 3 4 1. e : 1 % 1 '7n5, but mere private come rat yet.s r .i, l i t ,.. ° )ti rd . o ei t t e ik, l tt , ~.s. -ei„. b t ,„ producing letters marked ,) 0 44 : 14,41ii1,04.14N„i1ie1,Wh0 ,leen resorted to by the Noble ' e rre ti . li t) ). trcpeet Had tiled to tie - seeakir under prr Y b.. N4l, wlsi n • Secretar N .g A r ip Cti y r d ee stat e d the Y( facts on his own fe"i s e eel . tib i' il uOti Y't ' l4 l'iti s for 4, ei ,. ity , nt nay ntii t. ... m aine ___ . o f arts' , 1 i 'z , ,,,, j l ie k i tit ! ee l) , e , ,,,i '_"Pocodbility might cer e weiciova ti, eiiii , to th 1 4 , y V4rling inn ' though he could not The on'y_ real re eV(' t h. Li ) "I tl R(4, . "rifil,- n , lr• LPP riper btr,:tht e 'r te e ' 'ld ieah.e in , Was that . ut., no to te,,,, t1 : 4 40, t t :',. tt, e 4 '.'ty ~ u l ''', , !lib, n thsewilluiciihisut.." , ~,d, ill b• tiv, I h ad ' , l o o t . th. it or Pt , re fU 1, d 1 .1 „,, i , o t . o ot • H e . en re-poneibility" . ref oeta, , e e l, 0,, ea t e kiriat tone. rely i +lc .d ti I a t ful h ti nt! tr Ui t l Pt ‘'Ple • • et " in the 11 ' at .ket'" t a id, aiite ind be to tb * it was House of the trine in keeping reso la , the ri t hat ~, 11 to •" deotr O b . -‘ 44t rleil throughu of the people :bob 1-0 Of' v Ito, Witt Wet° Qt Oat val i such dim- N o , le that. 11t,...., mi the List co ' , iluuse.were I . stitution the abuses of every beastly borough were protected with such fostering care six months ago.—(oh, oh.) He did not care for the " Oh, oh," of the Hon. Members ; he was not to be gagged by them, as they were shout to pg his unfortunate' country. He had also received letters from Ireland, and be would read one to the House, which was not anonymous. This letter, which bore date the last week, " strongly urged the Irish Members to fight hard, and not allow so atrocious a measure, for which, it added, there was not the slightest necessity. Many English Members had acted a glorious part in opposing it. There was to be a large county meeting in a day or two to petition against it. As to the Conservative., thegeneral opinion was, that they would vote for tying logs to the legs of every Irishman, if a Bill to that effect were brought before Par liament." This was the effect of the letter, and now he would inform the House whose opinions these were ; the writer was Sir Richard Musgrave—(Hear, hear)—one of the late Members of that House, and than whom not a worthier or more excellent gentleman could be mentioned. Was not the evidence of such a man much more important and worthy of attention than that of the twenty-six sti pendiary Magistrates, whose appointments had been made by his M a j esty ' s present weak M i nistry ? that Ministry, who set up f or suc h i mpart i al i ty as to be indifferent to either side; whose banner motto was— " Tros Tyriusve nullo discrimine habetur." The Ministry has also another important argument for their proceedings, which was founded upon nothing more or less than a ballad ! If they were in want of arguments, he could produce one in the shape of a bro -der sheet of paper than their ballad, and which contained much more important matter, and which was signed, moreover, by ne unimportant characters—at the head of the list appearing the name of E. C. Stanley, a name followed by others no less distinguished. The Hon. Member then produced a number of large sheets of paper, which he said was the proclamation of Ministers, authoriing the enforcement of processes for a large amount of tithes in different parishes, the value of many of which processes was but a farthing. The Hon. Gentleman then related a case where, at the suit of a Reverend Mr. Palmer, a poor man was obliged to come a very long journey to show cause why he should not pay tithe due to that Rev. G-atle man, amoureing to no legs a sum thin one penny. The case to which he alluded was that of Mr. Palmer, though he did not say that this was a fir temple of all the clergy. It was, perhaps, worse than the average. Its truth could not he doubteit, for he had documents in his hand, written by Mr. Palmer himself, to prove it. He had to complain, too, that the law officers carried the law into execution in a manner most unfavourable to the people. The declaration of the Right Hon. S-cretary was well known and remembered in Ireland. It wag — that he would never consent to turn one shilling of Church property Irons ecclesiastical purposes. Was it calculated to restore peace to that country, that her destinies so ould he suffered to remain in the heeds of the Right Hon. Gen tleman who had made that declaration ? The Irish could not forget that, eighteen months ago, the Right Hon. Gentleman had proposed an Arms Bill for -Ireland, which exposed every man to be transported who had a musket in his possession, not branded and registered by the officers of the Government. The Irish could nor forget that the Right Hon. Gentleman was the fist person to suggest changing the venue. The propositions of the Right Hon. Gentleman were rejected by the Parliament befote it was reformed, and were they to he carried by acclamation in tie fist Reformed Parliament?—(Hear, hear.) The Right Hon. Gentleman talked of teaching Ireland a lesson ; he was afraid that it might be in characters of blood.— (Oh, oh!) Gould the Right Hon. Gentleman teach a les on to 8,000,000 of people? Let him first learn the discreet lesson to do no wrong. Let him also learn that the law derives all its force from the acquiescence of the people. Let them remove the causes of the grievances, and make the laws so that the people could admire them for their justice, and then they would willingly obey them.—(Hear, bear.) The Irish poet was a prophet as web as a poet. Mr. Moore said, most justly-- " As long as Popish spade and scythe Shall dig and cut the Sassanagh's tithe, And Popish purses pay the tolls On Heaven's road for Sassanagh souls-- .••. • 5 • So long the merry reign shall be Of Captain Rock and his family." He entreated ttie H -use not to pass the Bill, which did but crown whole ages of misrule with a concentration of all the virus of all the abom noble principles of Tnryisin. The Right Hon. Baronet (Sir Robert Peel) had led the House astray by the pathetic story be had told of an event which happened nearly twenty years ago, and if the House had not subsequently been disabused, it would retain the impression that the event narra ed was of recent occurrence, and was a picture of the present state of Ire land.—( Hear, hear.) The Right Hon. Gentl man had also talked of the oppression of the landlords in Leland. He did not defend the landlords, for there was much misery in Ireland. Would the House believe that the people of that country, the most productive of the best of fond, abounding in cattle, pigs, anti corn—would the House believe, that three millions out of the eight mil- Him of inhabitants never tasted animal food except on Christmas-day and Easter Sunday? The Right Ho nourable Baronet wished them, however, to consider the tithes as having no part in causing all the misery of Ire land. The Right Hon. Baronet wished to ptee-rve t the clergy the tithes of Ireland. The Right Hon. Baronet was sensible of many of the evils of Ireland—but what bad he ever done to remedy them? For six years he had h e ld the Government of that country ; he had supported with all his power that system of ascendancy which had been the curse of Ireland—he had supported the claims of the gentlemen egsinst the many, and had not taken any one step to remedy the evils of which he the other night so pathetically complained. The Right Hon Baronet had studiously prepared that oration, and certainly he had made a great impression on the House ; hut while the affecting picture drawn by the Right Hon. Bironet had influenced the House, he himself had not been affected by it. He had turned immediately to some trifling criticism about the armorial bearings of the Gentlemen who introduced the amendment. He implored the House not to pa-s this Bill, and not to leave the destinies of the nation in the hands of an individual who had admitted himself to be the most unpopular man in Ireland.—(Hear, hear.) Mr. JOHN BROWNE knew that all classes in Ireland were anxious to have this Bill.—(No, no ! from the Op position, and Hear, bear ! from the Ministerial side.) He knew that it required much moral and physical strength to make an avowal of the kind ; for there was in Ireland a party which had extended itself into that House, and which endeavoured to make every man odious to the people who had the courage to op pose it.—(Hear, hear, hear.) He was persuaded—cen scientiously persuaded--that the Bill was nicessarv, and he formed that opinion after five months' residence in Ire land. It was natural for the Hon. and Learned Alem her for Dublin to strive to excite popular clamour against this measure. It was equally natural, however, that the people of Ireland should desire tee return of tranquillity. The greatest sufferers in Ireland were the industrious pea. sentry. who were cruelly punished for their loyalty to their King and obedience to the laws. He had before de scribed the system of intimidation which existed in the county of Mayo, which was encouraged by the Political Unions. The individual who most , promoted it was a man driven from his caste, and forced to associate with the lowest and most degraded people—wh o had b-en more than once tried for arson, and almost convicted of per jury; and this was the man who on a former occasion had been ca!led the patriot of Mayo. The last place he saw or heard that gentleman, lie was in the chair at a meeting of the Volunteers of Ireland, and that single cir cumstance might, he thoueht, give the House a good eitiou of the Political Unions and Volunteers of Ire -4.—( Hear.) 'v. W. ROCHE could not consent to pass a law would inflict a most deadly wound on the Con- Sir J. KEY said, that the treat argument against the Bill was, that it took away all liberty from Ireland ; but he would in mrn, ask, did there exist such a thing as consti tutional lii,rty in that country—(Hear, hear)—or any iib.-rty but that of violating the law, and murdering e pc .cealde inhabitants ? It was necessary that the Bill should precede, not foilow remedial measures; for until outrke was put down, remedial measures would prove abortive. Arbitrary, despotic, and unconstitutional as the B II was, he should, nevertheless, under the circumstances, support it, as tending to lay a secure foundation for future improvement ; but he would nut pledge Ititnself to vote for every clause it contained. Mr. O'FERHALL rose principa'ly to complain of the extraordinary and offlasive language used by the Hon. Member for Mayo (Mr. J. Browne). That gentleman had characterised the opponents of the Bill, who had tfonte pledged to a certain measure, a+ persons without Inde pendence, and a+ men who bad raised them-elves to con sideration on the shaulders of the mob. Now he (Mr. O'Fetrab) claimed for every gentleman who had opposed the Bill just as mud] spirit and independence as belonged to any who sup,:sorted it. The Hon. Member hail the in. delicacy to drag into the discussion before the House the name of a gentleman who tt as actually under prosecution by the Attorney-General.--(Cheers.) Had any of the Hon. Member's friends ever been in a similar si , urtion, how would he hive felt at hearing his name dragged into a de bate? He hoped the Hun. Gentleman would withdraw his expressions. As to the Bill, the course be should pursue would please neither party. 'When ou the Committee of , last year, which was appointed to inquire into the cause of disturbances in the Queen's County, he had agreed with persons of the most opposite political principles in recom mending that the hands of Government should be strengthened ; and the singularity of so extraordinary an agreement of opinion ought to have induced the Heim Se cretary for Ireland to try those powers rather than resort to such a Billie the present. It was most important to consider whether the Bill was not stronger than was tie cetisary, and whether it might not ultimately tend to the perpetration of disturbance.—(Hear, hear.) S evera l Acts had been lately passed to strengthen the hands of landlords, and these bore very heavily on the poor. In the Queen's County, and in another also, he knew that the clearances of estates had been the cause of the disturbances. There was no immediate or necessary connexion, as had been asserted, between political agitation and disturbance; hut certainly if, at a public meeting, a clergyman or a landlord should be described as an extortioner, it would create an unfavourable reeling in the district towards him. Mr. J. BROWNE said that the Hon Member for Mid dlesex had declared that no one of station, rank, or cha racter bore testimony to the necessity of the B'll. This assertion he had attempted to negative by referring to the individuals on his side of the House who had asserted its necessity, and he would repeat, that a Member pledged to any particular measure, was not independent.—(Hear.) For himself, he was not rich, but lie hoped he was as in dependent, as any Member in the Heim. Upon the sub_ ject before the House he claimed perfect freedom ofspeech. but the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. 0 Ferrell) was the last per son t o whom he would apply an offensive expression. Mr. NORTON supported the Bill. Lord ALTHORP and Mr. COBBETT rose at the same moment, but repeated cries of 1 6 Althorn," and " With draw," induced Mr. Cohliett to resume his seat. Lord ALTfIORP said the House was not discussing whether the Bill should be read a second time, but the whole debate turned on the order of the day directing that the Bill be read a second time, and thus no progress was made. The Hon. Member for Middlesex denied that the evidence adduced was sufficient to warrant the passing of the Bill: but this objection should have been made on a previous occasion, as the House, by its vete upon the first reading, had decided that the evidence was quite sufficient to justify the measure. The Hon. Gentle men had indulged in a great variety of general observa tions upon Ireland, but it was to be regretted that he had not applied himself mere closely to the question before the House. He had, indeed, declared that lie had no confi ri nee in Ministers, and if he had not, he was justified in refusing such powers to them. One cause assigned by Ism for that want of confidence was, th it the remedial measures which had been promised in last session were not passed. He had referred particularly to the declara tion's made by him (Lord Altherp) and the Hon. Serie tary for Ireland —h e accused them of having broken their pledgee, and of having promised, an ." extine ion of tithes," which promise was never redeemed. Now, on the contrary, he (Lord Althnrp) would as• ssrt, that as soon as the measure of last session should have come into full operation, tithes would be ex tinguished in fact, and the name alone would remain.— (Hear.) They woul.l not, indeed, he put into the pockets of the landlords—(Cheers)—who had bought their land subject to tithes, and ought to hold it on the same condition ; but the great grievance of Ireland, and one telt in this country too—the pressure of tithes on cultivation, and their hostility to improvement—would be removed. The Bill had been delayed much longer than he wished, or expected, but when the measure should have come once into operation, the tenant—the occupier— would pay no tithes. He did not, indeed, know whether Hon. Gentlemen had the same understanding when Ministers made the declaration, but the report was euffi cieet to show that the Bill could not be very different from that ultimately introduced. The Hon. Member had, rreireovi r, said that the Ministers' Bill had been disho noured—referring, as he declared, to the non-introdurrion of the promised Grand Jury Bill. Now, there was no promise about a Grand Jury measure ; the Bill was to regulate Petty Juries.—(A laugh.) On this subject he (Leal Althorn) hid already frank'y admitted that his pledge had not been redeemed, hut the fault was neither his nor the Government's—it was solely the re-ult of cir cumstances. It was now, he confessed, an unredeemed pledge, and he regretted it, hut it would be redeemed in the pr sent session.—( Cheers.) He hid said to the lion. Member for Dublin, that if he *should not bring the Bid into this House Minis era would introduce it into the Upper; but they would make no obj-c-ions to his bring ing it into this Hiuse and the Hon. ill-mher was accord ingly about to do so. The Hon. Member for Mid dlesex had quoted 8 r Henry Parnell to prove that there w re no disturbances in the Queen's County. That certainly was a most extraordinary statement, be cau-e his Hun. Friend (Sir H. Parnell) was the man who drew up the report of the Committee of last session.— (Cheers.) The Him. Member for Kildare had also e mai ked the singular unanimity of opinion which declared that extraordinary powers must be granted to Govetn• ment. It was, therefore, impossible that Sir H. Parnell could have mule such a statement. The Hon. Member had also referred to the evidence of a Mr. Browne to prove that Kilkenny County was tranquil up to July I.st, and that the disturbances had been caused by the measures of last session. But it was quite impossible that Mr. Browne could have been spoken of last July—in fact, his evidence referred t 1830 —( Hear, hear.) The Hon. Member had also quoted letters from Sir P. Bellew and Lord Gormans. town ; but, on the other hand, the Loid Lieuten!nts of Carlow and Wexford had borne testimony to the necessity of the Bill, and in particular, the Lord Lieuten,nt of the King's County, tit whom the Hon. Member had been im prudent enough to refer, had spoken conclusively on that point.—(Cheers.) With a simplicity which carried con viction to every gentleman who heard him, he proved that. the county was not in the state described by the Hon. Member. His Hon. Friend the Member for Kil dare (Mr. Moore O'Ferrall) had said,„that he agreed with the Committee on this subject, which sat last session, that since strong measures were necessary to restore tranquillity to Ireland, he was quite sure that every gentleman who was acquainted with the talents and patriotic sentiments of his Hon. Friend, would readily believe that there was no man who was less likely to concur in arbitrary measures, without he fel convinced that the strongest necessity existed.—(Hear.) His Hon. Friend had, indeed, recom mended the adoption of remedial measures. 'Why, did they (the Ministers) ever say that remedial measures were not necessary? Had they not already given some ear nest of their determination to introduce remedial measures? —( Hear.) Gentlemen had said, '6 You have brought forward the coercive measure in the House of Lords, why did you not also bring the In h Church Reform Bill into that House in the first instance ?" There was one simple answer to be given to this, which was, that the Irish Church Reform Bill was a money Bill, and therefore must, in the first instance, pass the House of Commons —( Hear.) But his Majesty's Government took the very first opportunity of introducing their remedial measures into that House, to show that they were really in earnest on that point. He had already opened the subject of Irish Church Reform, and his Hun. Friend that of Grand Juries. If the House thought that they intended to stand still, wed not remedy the evils of Ireland, then, indeed, Hon. Members would be perfectly justified in opeosing any coercive tne.isur.s, and they would have no right whatever to ask the confidence of the House. His Hon. Friend had said the necessity for coercive measures should be so striking as to produce at, almost unanimous assent, and instanced the long debate which had occurred on the Bill as a proof of a want of sufficient unanimity. But though lie admitted that the debate was very long, yet tl ere was not, in his opinion, the slightest necessity for so long a discussion—(Heat )—and, as to unanimity, there were few instances, on any great question, of such a large and overwhelming majority.— (Hear, bear.) His Honourable Friend then said, that Ministers had failed to prove any connection between political agitation and the predial tor agricultural outrages. With regard to that puiut, no man believed, or would admit more fully than himself that he believed, that the political agitators, so far from intentionally stimulating these crimes held them in the ettnest abhorrence—(Hear, hear, from the Irish Members)—but the effect of pelitical agitation wassuch as eecesearily to produce irritation and discen tent ; and this irritatiun and discontent operating upon a population in a state of great misery and distress, neces sarily led to the commission of crime and outrage.-- (Hear, hear.) And certainly, though they might nct wish to do so, the consequence of their conduct wait the encou ragement of criminal outrages. It was said, that when this B 11 was passed into a law, there would be the same difficulty in obtaining evidence. This, however, he denied; it would have the effect of terrifying the persons engaged in carrying on this system of intimidation, and it would operate directly and practically, through the provisions, of the Insurrection Art, to prevent midnight meetings and outrag. s. He then referred to the speech of the Noble No, d, the Member or King's County (Lord Osmantown), as a very satisfactory answer to the observations of the Hon. Member fur Middlesex. Re and his alight [lon. Friend had been a+ tacked for not quoting the names of tree p r sons writing the leters which had been read to the House Toe reason fur their not doing so was obvious. They would instantly be marked as ohnoxioue persons by those violators of the law against whom they complained, and would net, unlikely, fall vi ctims to their revenge.—(Hear.) Mr. JAAJES GRATTAN did not deny that drstur• bailee existed in Ireland to au extent sufficient to warning the grant of some additional powers to the Executive. He would have gone as far, in compliance with the recom mendation of the Committee of last seggien, as to consent to domiciliary powers, or even to the powers under the Insurrection Act; but to a weastne so extravagant and so despotic as this he never could consent. It was said that the Hon. and Learned Member for Dublin was a dictator. He might be so, but he was no dictator of his; he held not his seat under the authority of that Hon. and Learned Gentleman. But he would say, if he was a dictator, why do you, in complaining of this circumstance, try to pull him down only for the purpose of setting up another in his place.—(Hear.) He objected to the existence of a dictatorship of any kind, but most particularly should he object to a legalised dictatorship in the shape of the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.—(Hear.) He would just say one word for the unfortunate Queen's County, of which so much had been said. He was quite sure that the Govern ment could always get Juries in that county ; the farmers and gentlemen did not flinch from attending. —(Hear, hear.) He said this from personal know ledge. It was rather a curious thing, that whilst the Honourable Member for Wexford was relating some most pathetic details to the House, the criminals were being tried—justice was taking its course, unimpeded and unintimidated—and several of the offenders have been con. victed and executed.—(Hear, hear.) He really thought that the impression respecting the intimidation of Jurors and witnesses seas much exaggerated. The county in which he resided (Wicklow) was in a most peaceable con dition. The assizes there only occupied the Judge one day. He was not an agitator—he had never agitated but once, and that was in favour of the Reform Bill, for the purpose of placing these gentlemen where they were— (" No, no," from the Treasury Bench)—end he should be glad to see them continue there—but not if they listened to the advice the Right Hon. Secretary for Ireland gave them respecting this Bill—nor unless the system of tithes was extinguished in Ireland. It had been said in justi fication of this measure, that hie father had supported the Insurrection Act; but the Insurrection Act was not at all to be compared to this Bill. Upon his honour he believed that one tithe of this Bill was sufficient to quiet every county in Ireland.—(Cheers.) Mr. BARRON rose to take that opportunity of com plaining of an attack upon him in the Standard news paper of Wednesday last. Words were there put into his mouth which he never used, and sentiments attributed to him which he abhorred. This was the language at trieuted to him The Protestant population in Ire land are 500,000, yet these enjoyed an income of 8,000,0001. or 9,000,600/. He would ask any Hon. Member whether this was a just distribution of pro perty ?" And the editor of the Standard then proceeded to comment upon this as though he advocated the division of the property of the Irish Protestants amongst the C tholics of Ireland. He must do himself and the public the justice to say, that he bad never used the obnoxious expressions attributed to him. What he said was this— that the Church property in Ireland amounted to eight or nine millions per annum, and what he asked was simply this—whether such an enormous property was necessary for the support of a Church establishment for only 500,000 Prorestats. He abhorred the sentiment which had been attributed to him. He might have the printer of the Standard called to the bar of the House, but it was nut his wish to act harshly towards the Press, but merely to set himself right with the public. Mr. FI tZSIMON (King's County)—ln reference to the observation of his Noble Colleague, that the county which lie represented had been disturbed only during the last two years, he would remark, that this disturbance arose out of the efforts of the inhabitants to free theme selves from the political thraldom under which they had la oured fur 30 years past. He regularly attended, whilst in Ireland, the assize+ and sessions, and he never saw jus tice fail fir want of witnesses, nor could he tax his me mory with one single instance in which a witness was af terward:, persecuted for giving evidence.—(Hear.) Col. PERCEVAL said that the county which he re presented was in a comparative state of tranquillity; but circumstances had recently occurred which convinced him that the preiticel infection which had prostrated other 'counties lief ire it was rapidly spreading itself even there. It was only last week that a house had been a tacked by an armed party at night. He agreed that it was a mon strous measure—(Hear, hear)—but be was convinced that any measure short of it would be insufficient.—(Hear, h. ar ) lie was surprised that gentlemen could deny the instance of intimidation tower •s jurors and witnesses in the teeth of so many well-attested facts Toe influence of those disturbers of the peace had .x -tended even over that House, and a Committee had beer) toianle to elicit evidence from a gentleman, except by engaging to suppress his testimony- When asked re specting the causes of the periodical agitation in Ireland, he stated, that if his testimony were sent to Ireland, wifi, his children, an,/ himself would lose their lives. The Hon. Member fir Wexfird had nut long ago boasted that the county of Wex'ord was in a state of tranquiliit ) . It no longer remained so. At the moment when they were then debating, the peasantry were seizing aims. H. had hail the good fortune—if it were goad fortune—te hear the Hon. M-tuber for Middlesex pass an eulogium on the Hon. and Learned Member for Dublin, who, ac. c rrding to the 1,1 in. Member, was the iitol of eight mil lions of the Iri-h people For his own part he would deny it, for he (Colonel Percival) was one of the eight millions, and the Hon. and Learned Member was nut his idol. He was on the tumble, in his opinion, and the (Colonel Perceval) would be willing to give him a push. In consequence of what had been stated the other day, lie had thought it his duty to cad upon his Rev. Friend, who had been designated reproachfully as the Vicar of Bray, and be had found that the statement respecting a lette, written by a Protestant was without foundation. There was a Protestant in the town of Bray of a had character; and immediately the Hon. and Learned Gentleman ex claimed, here ie a Protestant agitator, an Orengettian He was not an Orangeman, and he was not the author of the leiter-1,4001. or 1,5001. had been subscribed to find out who was the author of the letter, and he had not been Sound out yet. He would not repeat the indecent speech which the Hon. and Learned Member had put in the mouth of his Rev. Friend; but be had evidence that it was attributed to him without foundation. He had great pleasure in tendering his support to the Government in carrying the present measure. Mr. CHARLES BULLER moved an adjournment. Lord ALTHORP observed, that in an experience of twenty-nine years, he had known no instance of an ad journrni nt of a debate upon the order of the day. The House always either divided or allowed the order of the day to he read, and then adjourned it to ano ther day ; but adjourning the debate on the order of the day was absurd. Mr. WARBURTON said that the Hon. Member for Middlesex being absent, had sent a message to hint.— (Hear, hear, bear.) The House would nut blame his Hon. Friend for being absent, as it was in consequence of the illness of a member of his family. Anticipating the objection which had been made to an adjournment upon the order of the day, be desired him to state, that it would he equally agreeable to him if the amendment were moved on the second reading.—(Bear, hear, and great laughter.) That was the Hon. Member's wish ;he thought that in doing so his Hon. Friend was complying with the wishes of the House ; and he could not discover the cause of the merriment of Hon. Members.—(Reuewed laughter.) Sir JOHN SEBRIGHT did not know any right which any Hon. Member had to bring a message from an absent Member.—(Hear, hear.) lie (Sir J. Sehriglit) could not speak eloquently, but he would s ; eak frankly.—(Hear.) The Hon. Member took up as much time as any Member of the House when present, and laid down the law in a manner which he had never seen done by any one.— (Hear, hear.) There was a time when ht: deserved praise, because he confined himself to that which he well under stood.—(Hear, hear). Now there was not one subject that was brought before the House—nothing relating to our domestic or forei gn po li cy —no su bj ect, however com pFcated, which that Has. Member did not speak of in the most enlightened manner. —(Hear, and laughter.) Mr. COBBETT rose to order. The SPEAKER said the House would, perhaps, permit him to make smile observations. There was cer tainly no intention of dictating to the House. Every one knew that a motion once made could not be with drawn without the consent of the House ; and it could not very well be done without the consent of the Member himself. The Hon. Member for Bridport had been authoriz, dto give that assent. With respect to the question of dividing upon the order of the day, the House would see how inconsistent it would be to tojourn to Monday upon the question--whether the order of the day for the continuance of the adjourned' debate should b, read and proceeded upon on Friday.—(Hear, hear.) The proper course was to have the order of the nay read and a djourn it then to Monday. Mr. O'CONNELL concurred, and expressed a wish to know wt,ether the debate was to be closed on Monday ? Lord ALTHORP inquired whether the Hon. and Learned Member fur Dublin intended that the debate should close on Mond iy ? Mr. O'CONNELL said, it would he great presumption in so bumble an individual as he to pretend to say when the debate would be clos e d ; but he had no difficulty in concurring in the opinion of the Noble Lord that it would close on Monday. Lord ALTHORP under these circumstaaccv did not whic The House adjourned at a quarter to one o'clock, Monday. FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZETTE. WHITEHALL, MARCH 8. The King has been pleased to appoint the Reverend John Mackenzie to be Preacher to the Church or Chapel at Cromarty, vacant by the death of the Reverend John Finlayson. DOWNING-STkEET, MARCH 6. The King has been pleased to appoint Blaney Townley Bal. four, Esq., to be Lieutenant-Governor of the Bahama Islands. FOREIGN-OFFICE, MARCH 8. The King has been graciously pleased to approve of Mr. Rich ard Godefroy as Consul in London for his Royal Highness the Grand Duke of Baden. CROWN-OFFICE, MARCH 8. MEMBER RETURNED TO SERVE IN THE PRESENT PARLIAMRNT. TOWN AND PORT OF DOVER.—John Halcomb, Esq., in the room of the Right Hen. Charles Poulett Thomson, who was chosen one of the Barons for the said town and port, and also a Burgess for the borough of Manchester, and hath made his elec tion to serve for Manchester. WAR-OFFICE. MARCH 8. sth Regiment of Dragoon Guards—Lieut. A. Bolton to be Captain, by purchase, vice Hampton, who retires ; Cornet J. F. Scott to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Bolton ; R. Black wood, Gent., to be Cornet, by purchase, vice Scott, March S. 12th Regiment of Light Dragoons—C. Brett, Gent., to be Ve terinary Surgeon, vice Bunbury, whose appointment has not taken place. March 8. Ist or Grenadier Regiment of Foot Guards—Lieut. and Capt. F. Clinton to be Adjutant, vice Fitzroy, who resigns the Adju. tantcy only, March 8. Bth Regiment of Foot—Lieut. T. R. Thompson to be Captain, by purchase, vice Laing, who retires; Ensign W. Ogilvy to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Thompson ; S. Rrown, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Ogilvy, March 8. 17th Foot—A. H. Lucas, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Reynolds, promoted in the 2d Foot, March 8. 83d Foot—Capt. A. Robertson, from the 57th Regiment, to be Captain, vice Caldw e ll, who exchanges. March S. - 39th Foot—Lieut..Gen. Hon. Sir R. W. O'Callaghan, K.C.8., from the 97th Regiment, to be Colonel, vice Lieut.. Gen. Sir G. Airey, K.O H., deceased, March 4. 55th Foot—A. Campbell, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice De Havilland, promoted, March 1. 57th Foot—Gapt. C. 51. Caldwell, from the 33d Regiment, to be Captain, vice Robertson, who exchanges ; Lieut. T• Porter, from the half-pay Unattached, to be Lieutenant, vice J. Story, who exchanges, March 8. 69. d Foot—lErisign V. L. Lewis, to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Hill, who retires ; H. Wells, Gent., to be Ensign, by pur. chase, ♦ice Lewis, March 8. 75th Foot—Lieut. P. Delancey, to be Captain, 'by purchase, vice Hindle, who retires ; Ensign W. IL Halliday, to be Lieu tenant, by purchase, vice Delancey, March 8. 97th Foot—Major-Gen. the Right Hon. Sir H. Hardinge, K.O 8., to be Colonel, vice Lieut.-Gen. Sir R. W. O'Callaghan, appointed to the command of the 39th regiment, March 4. HOSPITAL STAFF. R. Jameson, Gent., to be Assistant-Surgeon to the Forces. vice Skelton, deceased, M srch P. MEMORANDUM. The date of Ridingma,ter H. Phillips' appointment to the Cor netcy in the 7th Light Dragoons, is 11th December, 1829, but he is to take rank in the army from the original date, viz., 25th March, 1828. DECLARATIONS of INSOLVENCY. ELI PETHURST, tailor, King-street, Holborn. JOHN BELLMAN, perfumer, Oxford. BANKRUPTS. JOSEPH TANSLEY, ironmonger, Little Dean-street, West minster, to surrender March 18, and April 19, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Flower, Bread-street. JOHN GRIFFITHS, hard confectioner, High Holborn. March 14, at half-past one, and April 19, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Thorndike, Staple Inn. THOMAS BRI GNI LL, innkeeper, South Mims, Middlesex, March 14, at half-past twelve, and April 19, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Colombine, Carlton Chambers, Regent. street. JOSEPH GLOSSOP, wax-chandler, Piccadilly, March 19, at two, and April 19, at eleven, at the Court of B.ukruptcy. Spurr, Copthall.court. JOHN HELLEWELL, worsted.manufacturer, Wadsworth, Yorkshire, March 16, and April 19, at twelve, at the Swan Inn, lalifax, Yorkshire. Jaques, Bettye, and Edwards, Coleman street, London ,• Edwards. Halifax. WILLIAM DIXON DAVIS, innkeeper, Leamington Priors, Warwickshire, March 22, and April 19, at one, at the Swan Hotel, Warwick. Porter and Nelson, New-court, Temple, Lon. don ; Haynes and Morriss, Warwick. SAMUEL HOBDAY, snuffer-maker, Aston. Birmingham, March 11, and April 19, at three, at the Union Inn, Birming. ham. Holine, Frampton, and Loftus, New Inn, London; Parker, Birmingham. WILLIAM PARTRIDGE, wharfinger, Birmingham, March 19, and April 19, at twelv e , a t R a d en h urst ' s Royal Hotel, Bir. iningham. Adlington, Gregory, and Faulkner, Bedford.row, London ; Willis, Birmingham. THOMAS CHAMBERS, builder, Leamington Priors, War. wickshire, March '2l, and April 19, at two, at the George Hotel, Warwick. Sharpe and Field, Old Jewry, London; Haynes, Warwick. FRANCIS LEE BYRNE, wine -merchant, Kingston-upon- Hull, Yorkshire, April 2, and 19, at one, at the George Inn, Liverpool. Lace and Sons, Castle.street, Liverpool; Taylor, Roscoe, and Turner, King's Bench-walk, Temple, London. THOMAS HODSON baker, Westbromwich, Staffordshire. March 21, and April 19, at eleven, at the White Hart Inn, ' , lg. beth, Warwick,hire. Hunt, New Boswell-court, Lincoln's Inn, London ; Hunt, Wedneshury. JOHN BRI N DLEY, farmer, Great Barr, Staffordshire, March 28, and April 19, at twelve, at the Union Inn, Birmingham. Heeley, Walsall, Staffordshire; Turner, Bloomsbury square, London. JOHN BATTYLL, common-brewer, Fulbourn, Cambridge. shire, March 19, and April 19, at twelve, at the Red Lion Inn, Cambridge. Hall, Lyon's Inn, London ; Foster, jun , Cambridge DANIEL NI eLD, cotton-spinner, Shaw Edge, Crompton, Lancashire, March 27, 28, at two, and April 19, at nine, at the Palace Inn, Manchester. Hampson, Manchester; Adlington, Gregory, and Faulkner, Bedford-row, London. JOHN WOOLISON plumber, Leamington-Priors, Warwick. shire, March 21, and Aptil 19, at two, at the George H ote l , Warwick. Sharpe and Field, Ohl Jewry, London; Hynes, War wick. DIVIDENDS. A. Murray, flour-factor, mr.r..-Lne, April 3, at half.past. twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy—H. J. Norris and G. Tyas, wine -merchants, But y.place, Bloomsbury, April I, at eleven, at the Court of bankruptcy—E. H and T. G. Thompson, linen drapers, St. Martin's lane, April 1, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy—W. Prince, slopseller, acechurch.street, April 2, at half.pa4 one, at the Court of Bankruptcy—T. Thomas, builder, Osnaburgh.street, Regent's Park, March 29, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Sherley, brewer, Haye4, Middlesex, March 29, at half-past twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. and W. Crankshaw, manu facturers, Manchester, April 3, at two, at the York Hotel, Manchester—A. Gordon and J. Johnston, common_ brewers, Salford, Lancashire, April 4, at nine, a t th e Y or k Hotel, Manchester—J and C. Pitt, goldsmiths, Worcester, April 1, at eleven, at the Guildhall Coffee-house, AVorcester— J. Bugg and Co., bankers, Spalding, Lincolnshire, March 29, at ten, at the White Hart Inn, Spalding—S. and S. Collier, blanket manufacturers, Witney, Oxfordshire, March 29, at eleven, at the Staple-Hall Inn, Witney—A. Neilson, draper, Ashford, Kent, April 3, at ten, at the Palace Inn, Manchester—J. Bowyer, scrivener, Petworth, Sussex, April 10, at the Angel Inn, Pet. worth—J. Broom, carpet-manufacturer, Kidderminster, April 29, at eleven, at the Star and Garter Hotel, Worcester. CERTIFICATES.—Msami 29. F. Brown, grocer, Watford, Her ts —W. Warn in gton, j u n., glove. manufacturer, Milborne Port, Somersetshire—G. Buhner,i eater, York—J. and G. Yorke, millers, Cheshunt, Hertfordshire—J. Buckley, coach-proprietor, Oldham, Lancashire—J. Bartholo mew, upholsterer, Derby—J. Thomas, saddlers'-ironmonger, Walsall, Stattbrdshire. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. H. Kitchin and G. Kinnear, jewellers, Dufour's-place—C. M. Wilks and J. Bales, innkeepers, Grantham--J. Lawe and Co., banker., Preston—J., W., and J. Holmes, ironmongers, Derby —J. Newt on and J. Evans, silk-mercers, Leicester.squar e --1 E. Partington and C. Wainwright, dyers, Manchester—E. Gan_ dell and J. Edwards, tea-dealers, Bow.lane—W. P. and J. Helby, grocers, Southampton—J. G. Fowler and T. Roberts, coakner chants. Eton—W. Bussey and T. Ward, chymists, Oxford—T. Rowland and W. Pitts, lime-burners, Plymouth—J. Hanson and Co., button-makers, Birmingham (as far as regards B. Barlow) COURT OF TH.E DEAN AND CHAPTER OF ROCHESTER, MARCH 7. IMVORTANT DECISION.-sMITH AND MOZE V. SIR A. KEATS. Iti this case the Churchwardens sought to subtract 1: church rate from Sir R. Keats, the Governor of the Royal Hospital at Greenwich, for his house, coachhouse, gardens, &c., situated within the Hospital. The question war altogether a novel one, and the claim was oppo•ed by the Governor on the ground that the Hospital was situated on lands that formed part of a royal domain, and that a rat, for the church had not been levied before, the land having belonzed to the Crown, and vested with the Hospital in Commi sionera for cbaritdble purposes. The arguments on bawd of the Churchwardens of the parish of Greenwich, who aro the promoters of the suit, and on behalf of Sir R. Keats, were heard at some length some mlnths since. Dr. LUSHINGTON appointed this day to give his judg ment. Toe question he had to decide was an important one—whether Sir R. Keats was liable to be assessed to the c'aurch rates according to the libel given in. The rate was made for a house, coach-house, drying-grounds. &e. ; the first assessed at 1501., the second at 201., and the last at 201 a year. In the opinion he should give he wished to he understood as exclusively confining hint self to the point. he hail now to decide, and not whether the lio-pital ought or ought not to be rated. No difference of opinion could exist as to the fact that all property prim, f ,cie was liable to the church rate with special exceptions. A church- rate bad existed in this country from time immemorial; no one could venture to assert when it was introduced into England, and he had not been able to discover the oistinct time it was introduced. The property of the Church itself was not rateable. As to property held directly or indirectly for the use of the Crown, there could be no doubt that it wa impossible to rate that. Prop erty i n possession of the wCoroutivd•nbbeeinnoipreosssgiztiou ewnafoartcreeepai)t,fmorenntoaogathinerstrtehaesocnr.owli by any distress again st t h e : property of t h e Crown. The ground of exemption relied upon by Sir R. Keats was that the Hospital was held of the Crown under the tenure of Common 'Wage, and that it stood on a Royal think it would be necessary to adjourn till to-morrow. IT( hoped they would adjourn to Monday. Mr. SHEIL gave notice, that he would move a reso lution respecting tithe*, on the 21st of March. Several petitions were presented by Mr. Itsxm, and other Hon. MornbPra. Mr. COBBIETT did not speak, as was expected, not having been able once to catch the Speaker's eye, although he ro►e repeatedly, At the Court at St. James's, the 6th day of March. 1833, PRESENT, THE KING'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY IN COUNCIL. His Majesty in Council was this day pleased to appoint Row land Eyles Egerton Warburton, of Arley, Esq., to be Sheriff of the county of Chester. domain Taking all the cireatnstances haw consideration, he had emus to the conclusion that Sir R. Keats was rate able. The intentions of the parties be did not know. The KING'S ADVOCATIC Said the Governor would be satisfied with the judgment of the Curt. A decision was required before the demand was p,id. Dr. LUSHINGTON considered the Governor had acted right in refusing to pay mosey belonging to this aisp;tal, established for the sick and wounded seamen of his Ma jesty's service, not sanctioned by law. The KING'S ADVOCATE said the better course would be to admit the libel and allegation, and for Sir R. Keats to declare he proceeded no further. This was agreed to, and the libel and allegation were admitted. AMERICAN PAPERS. "The 2d section places a do yof 50 per efat, on wool lens, plains, negro cloths, &c., suject in I.ke manner to reduction. " The 3d section requires the payment of all duties in rash af er Septemher 30, 1842, when all articles subject to duty shall pay 20 per cent, ad valorem. " The 4th section make' free linens hl•ach.d 'mod un bleached, silks from this side the Cape of Good Hope, worsted stuff goods, and all other articles of silk end worsted. '' The sth frees from duty after 1812 opium, raw cot :on, quick-ilver, &c. " The 6th aothotizes the repeal of confh:ting parts of the present tariff law, and of the modification of the new in time of war. " Mr. Calhoun expressed his satisfaction with the pro• visions of this bill. Mr. Forsyth opposed it strongly ; and Messrs. Poindexter and Sprague spoke in answer to him. " Mr. Webster said he was willing to lay the subject before the people, for the bill could he sustained only by public opinion. He asked leave, however, to 80,ruit re solutions containing his own Views on the subject. " Mr. Forsyth withdrew his motion to Lite the ayes and noes on the introduction of Mr. Clay's bill, and it passed to a second reading. " In the house on Tuesday, after some debate, the re solution to print 10,000 copies of the rrort of the ju diciary committee wrs carried. " In the committee of the whole on the state of the Union, Mr. Drayton modled his resolution to recommit the Tariff Bill, so as to instruct the committee to report another to keep the pre,ent law in force till the 3d of March, 1834, and to reduce all duties under 25 per vent. 5 per cent. a-year (and also specific duties), to the standard required by the necessities of the Gwernment; and, if further reduction be necessary, to remove 5 per cent, from protected articles, and 10 from unprotected— the protected being limited ultimately to 20 per cent. " A debate ensued which was interrupted by an ad. join -anent, " MORE PARTICULARS FROM MEXICO. " The following declaration of the city of ithxico, no tice of which we have before published, we translate front the Redactor. It is furnished by Vera Cruz papers to the 6th ult. (Translated for the Mw York Daily Adrertiser.) • 'ACCLIMATION OF THE GARRISON Ahll CITY OF THE CAPITAL OF THE 24EXICAN REPUBLIC. " In the city of Mexico, December 27, 1832, the chief., officers, sad troops of this earrieon strongly desircus to terminate the disasters of civil war, in which the nation is involved, and convinced that the project of pacification sent to Government for their approbation, cu the Ilfh inst., by his Excellency Anastasio Bustamente, and wliii duty di‘a t v o ow su m stai by n the the they have taken into consideration, is n ot to take cif et, the military composing the ga rr i son o f M ex i co have ape d, they considered et w t theiras not testablishedliatalthoug h Government majority of the nation, now, since the entire nation h..s leclsred in favour of the legitimacy of that of his Ex ,ellency Manuel G•ttlea Petirazt in the supreme can na ind, because he was eiected in the year 1828. and since General Bustamente also recognises it; the gairis. n, resting on three honourable ptiticiiilee and atiquieseing in the general wish of their fellow-citizens, declare that they will not in any manner oppose, and will not in :any way contribute to produce the mi-fortunes which would flaw upon the people from a fruitless and criminal resistance. We therefere agree on the following aline! s:— " s Art. 1. The garrison recognises his Excellewcy D. Manuel Gomez Pedraza as legitimate Pia-side:it of the United Mexican States, according to the 84th article, 4th chapter, Ist section, of the general constbution. 2. The gement' adopt, in all its parts, the plan of p icification proposed by their Excellencies Pedraza and Santa Ann., and edopteit by his Excellency General Bus tatnente and the division under his command ; and also dere to enter into all further engagements sad restrie cions since agreed to by both Generuls relating to the aforesaid plan. " 3. The garrison offers to preserve public tiaunuillity, and promises the smurity of Lfr anal property to all rite. Inhabitants of this capitol, by yielding to the politicrt orthorities such aid as they may reed for this important object. " ` 4. The garrison respects the opinions of all, what ever may have bren their divergencies, un;ess they shall .emand an overthrow of the public peace. " ` 5. Ti.e garrison hopes that all the authorities in- t , usted with the preservation of pul►;ic order, and chiefly the Governor of the district, will take soca ine.tsurcs as will eff• email) , secure i,. " ' 6. Per . sons who may he chargeable with exciting the least disorder, or exciting a revolution, or ailing in any manner, shall be responsible for the cons e q uences to t h e competent tribunals and judges, and imme , !iately arrested. " ' 7. Generals J. J. Herrera and F. Cod are in vited, on account of their intelligence and patriotism, and the confidence reposed in them iOr their virtues, to take coratnAnd of the troops composing this garrison, that the geneials who wish to be employed may immediately present themselves to their Excellencie,, from whose arran4ements we hope for the most favouraide results: 'nit' first named ehall take the supreme command of the garrison, ued Signor Codallos the second. " Jose Joaquim Herrera, Felipe Codalloe, Pc.dro Lemus, and many other signatures follow. " A letter of the same date front General Herrera to General Pedi aza informed him that as Boon as the garrison had male this declaration he deprived Mtizqu.a. the acting President, of all communication, ma it inc:ioures had been taken to secure the public tranquillity. Muzquiz was treated with due respect, and, as soon as possiiik allowed freely to proceed to his own house, according to his wish. The secretaryships were closed, and the portfolios left under the responsibility of the secretaries. •` General Herrera also wrote on the same day to Santa ,nna. NEW CABINET. " PUEBLA, DEC. 29.—Toe following persons have this day received the oaths as Ministers Dean Miguel ftranon Arizpe for the Del:ata:lent- of Justice, and in trusted with that of Finance ; the Licentiate Bernardo Gorzilez Angulo, for Foreign Relatioas, intrusted with the Drpartment of War." NOBLE AND INTREPID CONDUCT.-TIIIIrS- day afternoon, between two and three o'clock, an dent occurred on the Paddington Canal, near the Wooden midge, which must have proved of fatal consequences to a fine youth, between twelve and thirteen years of age, and his father, had it not been for the notile and intrepid conduct of a young man who was passing over the bridge at the time, of the name of PETER CHEVERALL, a gun smith, residing in Nelstm'e-place, Bryanstun square, St. Marylebone. The unfortunate youth, in company with his father, was proceeding along the towing-path of the Paddington Canal, when a horse, that was drawing a barge along the canal, passed the lad with the towing. rope quite slack, he being quite close to the water, when Sud denly the animal by his pulling made the rope tight, which instantly drove the unfortunate lad into the middle of the ••anal ; but being unable to swim, lie almost immediately sunk. The father implored assistance of the boatmen, nut they could not render any ; in this situation the al most distracted parent plunged into the water to his son's assistance; but being also unable to swim bo must have net with a w itery grave had it not been for the intrepid conduct of the ahove-named young nun, who witnessed the perilous situation of both father and son, who inane- Astely threw off his coat and plunged into the water atter them, and quickly succeeded in legaiGing the body of the. unfortunate lad, which be brought on shore with the t le nn d o t odaptirooncee wasd with en father.-.. After a short time th e lad recovered, and was n their deplorable condution. Th e f a th er o f the lad, not having sufficient money with him, proaentod.tbem intrepid preserver with rendered a is silver watch la soksa el imitu" kr she lir,suvotiffit :f :heir e is red father then to i in house ti ji every where accommodation CAY' BILL. "In the S enate of the IJu L ited S States, on Tuesday, Mr. Clay asked leave to introduce the bill to modify the tariff of July 14, 1832, and all other acts imposing duties on imports,' and made a speech of au hour ant a half to ex plain his views. "The lit section fixes all duties at 20 per cent, ad ca. lorem after 1842 ; and provides for their gradual redue. tion to that rate, by taking al' every two years for eight years 10 per cent. of the excess over 20 per cent, ad valo rem, and afterwards removing one half the still remaining excess in 1841 and the other in 1812. a,. F