The Sun. — London, England, 1831-03-11 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. If we may judge by the reduced calculation of the ex perienced whippers-in of the Tories, ultra and citra—the Wellingtonians and the Peelers—the great remedial mea sure of Reform is in much less danger of rejection than we at first apprehended. The majority last week against the Bill was stated at 100—it is to-day reduced to 40, and before Monday se'nnight we predict that a tithe of that number will be their utmost hope. We firmly believe that the voice of the people is exerting its due influence among the Members of the House of Commons ; those who feel themselves really qualified and called upon to take a part in the business of legislation, and to whom it is an object of honourable ambition to represent their countrymen in Parliament, shrink from marring their fair prospect. by adhesion to abuses tolerable only to a few families and corporations. County Members have to ask themselves how they will stand, even with their present constituents, if their rotes should defeat a popular measure, not brought forward speculatively by an individual, but practically introduced by the Minis ters of the King, and with his repeated and cordial sanc tion. Sir James Graham has been taunted for havi ng said that the plan of Reform would satisfy all moderate men. We profess to belong to that class, and we concur with the Right Hon. Baronet; for we are convinced that the bigoted maintenance of flagrant abuses, ev en t h ough the sphere of their operation were limited, which is not the case of close boroughs, is, in the present day, impos sible; and, without using the language of intimidation, we are equally sure that political convulsion must inevitably follow from the attempt. Many individuals, now Mem bers of the House of Commons, and who have been tempted thither by the easy access afforded by their mo ney, and the total absence of accountability as repre sentatives, may, perhaps, withdraw from the occupa tion in future; but still they are not mad enough to risk the tranquillity of the country by flinging the Bill of Reform, not merely bark upon the Mi nistels, hut into the anxious and formidably thoughtful faces of the people of England. We have heat d even some desperate Tories say, with all the bitterness of disappointed pride, " We dare not any longer oppose it; for we dare not come to issue with the middling classes and the popu. lace; but we will cherish a most unextinguishable hatred against those Ministers who, belonging to our order, have ventured to look beyond it." Those Ministers will in deed require the support of all moderate and well-judging men in the country, and the expressions of gratitude to the Monarch should be accompanied with declarations of confidence in his Ministers. Fortunately we live under a Prince who acknowledges no advisers on public affairs but his responsible servants ; but no effort will be left untried to shake the cordial approval of his Majesty to the pia❑ of Reform, even though it should pass through the Houses of Parliament. We have heard it asserted by some who justly deserve the name of malignants—for most fully do they ma lign the people of England—that the personal comfort and interests of our beloved Sovereign would be curtailed and invaded by a reformed Parliament, and that English loyalty knows no other asylum but in close boroughs. British loyalty, we tell those malignants, has its altar in the hearts of the people. There are amongst us, indeed, indi- victuals addicted to every crime, moral and political; there are amongst us other individuals misled by every species of fanaticism, religious and political, but the people of England are unchanged in their national character; they love their King, they are attached to the very trap pings of the monarchy, but they are (oh grievous offence) tired of the autocracy, and parliamentary jobbing of borough proprietors. We believe that we have some knowledge—at least our duty leads us to seek for it—of the middling classes, and we are confident that no dispo sition exists amongst them to abridge the comforts or d•tract from the splendour of the Monarch. It is the fashion with some petulant and haughty gentlemen in the House of Commons to vituperate " that corrupt and profligate thing, the daily Press," of which, however, they prufrss " themselves to be the slaves ;" and why should the Commons House of England dread the press ? Solely because they do not represent the people. Is it to be imagined that if that House did col lectively and individually represent the people at large, and bodies of respectable constituents, the voice of the daily press would be more potential than theirs? Why do the Ministers of the Crown, even after having carried a measure by their auxiliary and at present indispensable band of borough proprietors, still anxiously examine the co lumns of the daily papers? They wish to ascertain the feelings of the people, of which these papers are the mere organs. They know full well that as their measures are meant for the nation, a body which does not represent that nation cannot pronounce conclusively on their fitness. The want of confidence in the House of Commons; aris ing mainly from the antiquated abuse of personal nomina tion, has given its present power to the press. In com mon parlance the opinion out of doors has now more weight than that within the walls of the House of Com mons; hut however mortifying it may be for us to descend from our cathedra, profligate or powerful as the petulant young gentlemen may choose to call it, such must be our fate whenever the people shall be fairly represented.— Morning Herald. Few speeches delivered upon the question of Reform have told more effet-tively than that of the Member for Hertford, who, in a tone of so much good-humoured raillery, descanted upon the value and importance of the votes of Members sitting for rotten boroughs. It may be that such Members, or some of them, are men anim..ted by the loftiest and purest principles of patriotism, and that it is (however hard the thing to imagine) a real concern for the maintenance of the Monarchy, and the privileged orders of the State, which prompts their resistance to the proposed measure. But without any uncharitable estimate of individual motives, it is not surely to be forgotten how deep a personal interest these men have in the perpetua tion of the present system ; nay, in postponing far the brief term of their own liver, or a shorter period, the great and auspicious change now under consideration. What, we ask, would become of such men as Mr. Goulburn, Mr. Horace Twirls, Mr. Croker, Mr. Courtenay, et hoc genus Mlle, the pbalarax of orators and statesmen arrayed against Reform in the late debate, under a reformed Parliament ? Would not they sink into total insignificance ? Would any of them have the smallest chance of obtaining official distinction or emolument ; nay, how should such people find their way into the Legislature at all ? Is is, therefore, a little to much for men of this stamp, all more or less (not to use the phrase offensively) political adventurers, that is, men engaging in politics as a profession—it is a little too much for them to expect that much weight or importance shall lea attached to their demure protestations of alarm and 'apprehension for the happiness and good government of th e co un t r y, whil e p eo ple having a deep and real stake in that country look with hope and confidence to the measure. The arguments Of such persons, if any they can produce, may properly be listened to as coining from advocates engaged by every motive of personal interest and political obligation to do their beet for the bsroughmongers; but their asseverations and denunciations ought to be as little regarded as those of other men having a deep private interest in the subject matter cf consideration. In the present plan of Reform— as to any political scheme, and to Reform itself altogether— as to any other proposition of a great and comprehensive character, and operating widely and deeply on the con dition of mankind—ingenious men can have little difficulty in starting many colourable objections ; but a wise man, setting the good against the evil, will decide according to the preponderance ; and a goad man will avow the honest convictions of his understanding. A solemn and powerful exhortation on this head was delivered to the House on Wednesday evening; we would repeat it, and earnestly implore men of all parties and sects to approach the consideration of this momentous inquiry in the spirit of earnest and dispassionate investigation, not searching aaer quibbles and objections, subtleties, and evasions, but largely and comprehensively embracing the question in all ;Gs extent, and forming thereon a cool, wise, and unpre jueiter.l judgment. It is said that Mr. Baring means to propose diminishing by a moiety the number of boroughs to be disfranchised. The proposition is every way worthy of his understanding and statesmanlike qualities, But a man of spirit would feel little desirous to preserve un changed the constitution of an assembly in which his re ception has been so far short of what even a regulated oinQur propre might expect.—Morainp Chronicle. There has b een - something most peculiarly disgusting in the late prolonged and d we will not sly improperly pro 'cVed—debate on approaching Parliamentary Re rill. That disgusting : i i i,i atter relates to the terms in ich the rotten boron them, are spoken of. and ith the persona connected I , tc, erto it has been usual, in , ig to these abominations pt a style of cautious insured language : but we observeal that the enemies and defend openly rn in the present instance avoNv ,shingly the property of boron z Can any on e u:rsopfuda rottenence as l i i a consummation of profligate • what is meant by the possession O? t If) 'by, the r i g ht of nominatin g persons, who, e of repre s e ntatives of the people,ne money y an d vote away the public ted, any th in g can be tolerated. *No. ~ are for ever done with ! 'But 'tint connected with this subject, e the ,c'necnies of the Reform Bill —Are they doing no injury to the 'l property, whilst they represent as such the detestable corruption of nominating members of Parliament ? They may, by this language, sink the security of property to the level of rotten boroughs, but they cannot raise rotten boroughs up to the consequence and security of real property. There was Mr. Goulburn, the other night, who repeated (though by the way, he misapplied it) the well-known story of King James and his two Bishops, and compared witk these latter Mr. John Smith and Sir Charles Wetherell, as if the tempo ralities of bishoprics were no better than the property in rotten boroughs. Is this wise, Mr. Goulburn? and will the Bench thank ycu for the simile c Depart from such freaks of rhetoric, we advise you ; and if rotten boroughs cannot be defended without hazarding the most sacred right of property, desist from the defence of them, and let us have an honest Parliamentary Reform.— Times. It is sufficiently known that one leading topic of com plaint against the Union by the Irish agitators, has always been the decay of commerce and its attendant wealth, assumed to be the effect of that measure upon the interests of the people of Ireland. As there is nothing like arith metic in all such cases, we subjoin two papers which are calculated to throw light upon the above question under two points of view—first, as to the amount of live stork ex ported from Ireland to this country during the year 1830 , second, as to the balance of another kind of stock—namely, that constitutin4 funded property:--bought and sold by resi dents in Ireland during the six years and a half commencing on the 6th of July, 1924, and coming down to the sth of January, 1831. The value of cattle, &c., taken off by the Liverpool market alone, during the year expired on the sth of last January, was, according to the account in question, about 1,400,0001., without reckoning a single cargo of those which may have been delivered in Bristol, or other western ports of Great Britain, from the north and south of Irelanl. Then as to value realized by resident Irishmen in the public funds. It appears, that from the 6th of July, 1824, to tie sth of January, 1831, the trans fers from Ireland to England amounted to upwards of 5,000,000/. sterling ; and the transfers to Ireland from this country exceeded 19,000,0001., leaving a clear balance in favour of Irish purchasers of not less than 14,000,000/. sterling, or more than 2,000,0001. per annum ! What the purchases of Irish land, or other investments of wealth, by British capitalists, have been, within the same period, we possess at present no means of ascer taining or conjecturing ; but, unfortunately, a large de duction must be made from what wou!d have been the natural amount of such investments, because of the cruel state of uneasiness and disturbance into which Ireland has been thrown fur some years past, by the traders in political convulsion. • RETURN OF CATTLE EXPORTED FROM DUBLIN TO LIVERPOOL BY THE CITY OF DUBLIN STEAM-PACKET COMPANY IN THE YEAR 1830. Horses, 569 ; cows, 43,412 ; pigs, 48,306 ; sheep, 73,177 ; lambs, 4179. Valuing the above as follows :—Horses, 30/. ; cows, 101. ; pigs, 1. ; sheep, ‘..)1.; and lambs, 15s. each, the estimated money pro duce would be--Horses £17,040 4 0 Cows 114,E20 0 0 Pigs Sheep 17,3.91 5 0 Total value of cattle shipped on board the City of Dublin Steam Company's vessels at Dublin, and delivered at Liverpool, within the year ISSU 711,510 5 0 It has been stated that an equal quantity of stock has been imported to Liverpool from Dublin by ether vessels within the above period ; if so, the total value of the live stock so imported to Liver._ _ . _ pool from Dublin should be increased by 711,510 5 0 Total estimated value as above C1,1'43,020 10 0 Feb. 17, 1831. AMOUNT OF GOVERNNIENTSTOCK IMPORTED AND EXPORTED FROM JULY 6, 18'24, TO JAN. 5, 183! Transferred to England. Consols 3 per Cent. Reduced 3'4 Reduced Old per Cent. New 4 per Cent. Ditto as New 34", per Cent Balance in favi 1,133,500 972,600 785,000 1,3'24,100 563,400 52,500 X 5,1221 , 100 it of Ireland ....., Transferred from England. 3,558,600 1,1'22,800 I,t ,59, 4 J00 10,663,900 2,281,600 685,200 19,402,200 5,'_%21,100 X 14,151,100 Received from the Committee of the Dublin Stock Exchange, Feb. 14, 1831.—[ Times.] It would he very extraordinary if the borough propri etors and their nominees did not fight hard for a system under which they had long enjoyed a monopoly of the " good things" in Church and State. It would be still more extraordinary if they could, by any process of rea soning, induce the people of this country to beli.ve that the peculiar advantages which they have so grossly abused they should be allowed any longer to possess. It is in vain for the boroughrnongers to express a most sensitive and zealous regard for the preservation of the " Constitu- lion." They who never allowed the Constitution to stand in the way of the gratification of their own political ambi tion or cupidity, will not obtain credit for this new-born attachment to its " endangered principles." Only think of the principles of the Constitution being endangered by a measure which is to substitute a real for a mock representation of the people of England !—a measure which presumes that the original theory of the Con stitution, whet► it spoke of representation►, in which the people were to have a voice, only meant a system of aristocratic nomination, in which the people were to have no voice. Such is the boroughmongers' interpretation of the theory of the Constitution, as far as the elective fran chise is concerned, and their practice has been an apt illus tration of their doctrine. But they cannot defend that practice without admitting that corruption is necessary for facilitating the business of Government. If a Govern ment be honest, we cannot understand what need it has of corruption ; and if it be not honest, we do not see why it should be supported sit all. The " public debt" of this country, which has exhausted by anticipation ages of the public revenue, and crushed the productive industry of the land beneath a mountain of taxation, is an instance, and a melancholy one, of the corrupt facility with which affairs of State have been heretofore managed, to the detriment of the national interests. A real representation would have thrown serious obstacles in the way of iniquitous wars and profligate expenditure, and thereby made it more difficult fur a bad Government to ruin the country.—Morn. Herald. The Reform Bills for England, Scotland, and Ireland, were, as we mentioned yesterday, introduced on Wednes day night, with the approbation of the House of Commons, to its consideration, and read a first time. The battle of Reform must not, however, he considered as won—the first reading of a Bill is only a preliminary step—the se• cond the decisive touch, and for which the abettors of cor ruption and misrepresentation are mustering all their forces—and the Committee of the House on it, the quarter in which, in default of a decisive vote against the Bill itself, its sense and details, it is hoped, by them, will be frittered away, and rendered useless to the people of the United Kingdom. Such, we fearlessly assert, are the hopes and expectations of the dying boroughmongers—of the lies of their organs we say nothing, and only allude to them for the purpose of warning the people of England to be on-tlair guard. We fight against the supporters of cor ruption, under the King's colours—for the King is a Re former, and we say to all who are interested in the destruction of abuses, that the battle is only began—not ended—that the fire must be kept up, and that, in order to insure victory the able advice of a cotemporary must be adopted. That advice is to petition for " the Bill" as brought in by his Majesty's 3finist,rs, and not for Reform only—and to appoint Committees for the purpose of supporting " the Bill," as it is, and in all its parts and stages. These Com mittees ought to be universal—they ought to he Com mittees of counties, of cities, of boroughs, of towns, of parishes, and of wards; and above all there ought to be Committees of those towns, boroughs, cities, and districts for which new Members have been proposed. The great parish of Marylebone ought to meet immediately for the above purpose—so ought Lambeth—the Tower Hamlets— and, in a word, every other district and town to which it is intended in " the Bill" to give representatives. The "enemy" will be busily at work while " the Bill" is under consideration ; and nothing but Committees throughout every part of the country can carry it through the two Houses of Legislature.—Morning Advertiser. SHIP-BUILDING.—To give an idea of the enormous quantity of timber necessary to construct a ship of war, we may observe that 2,000 tons, or 3,000 loads, are computed to be required for a 71. Now, reckoning 50 oaks to the acre, of 100 years' standing, and the qnan tity in each tree to be a load and a half, it would require 40 acres of oak forest to build one 74; and the quantity increases in a great ratio for the largest classes of line of battle ships. The average duration of these vast ma chines, when emp'oyed, is computed to be 14 years. It is supposed that all the full-grown oaks now in Scotland would not build two ships of the line.— Quarterly Jour nal of Agriculture. . 7 L STANDARD NOVELS, uniform with toe Waverley Novels. The first number of the above very attractive publication is just issued by Messrs. Cousuits and 131tNTLILY. It contains the whole of Coorza's much admired story of the " Pilot," for 6s. and the public should be apprised that in no other publication can they procure a chesp and uniform edition of the entire works of the celebrated author of the " Spy," as the copyright of all the late works of Mr. COOPER, first printed in Eng land, is the exclusive property of Messrs. CoLBUitN end 13 lIENI f EY. LENT ASSIZES. LANCASTER, MARCH 8. ENTWISTLE v. NORA:LUTE. This was an action of trespass and false imprisoutnent. The defendant pleaded that he was net guilty, and also a jestiftcation, alleging that the plaintiff had been in his service as clerk, and that he had embezzled a sum of money which he hat received in his capacity of clerk; for which reason defendant cause l him to be apprehended And carried before a magistrate. The Jury found for the plaintiff—Damages 100/. James Lynch and Sarah Jones were indicted for having knowingly and without lawful excuse had in their possession and custody at Liverpool 56 counterfeit sove reigns, 15 counterfeit half sovereigns, 1,192 counterfeit half crowns, and . 27,t4 counterfeit shillings, with intent to utter the same.—Guilty. Catharine 111. Donald was indicted for having paid and pet off to Ann Jones, at Liverpool, three pieces of false and counterfeit milled money, made and counterfeited to the 1 keuess and similitude of half-crowns, at a lower rate than the same did by its denomination ibnport.—Verdict Guilty. LINCOLN, MARcil S. BENNETT V. CURTIS. This was an action of slander. The clef ndant is a farmer, and although upwards of 70 years of age, he mar ried a young woman in 1829, who is ❑ow only 21. In some few months after his marriage, it would appear that he became jealous of his wife, for he quarrelled with her, and pressing her side against the arm of a chair, when he supposed her to be pregnant, he exclaimed, " thee, if it is a Imstard, I will tear it out of thee." The wife was so ill in consequence of this usage, that the plaintiff, a surgeon and accoucheur, was called in to attend her, and she did not recover for nearly a month. Some time after wards the defendant met the plaintiff, and having, from some cause not in evidence, conceived an animosity towards him, he began to abuse him, and said to some persons who were passing by, " He has killed any pretty bairn, and torn it out of my wife's body," although his wife had, in point of fact, never been pregnant at all. He also, at a subsequent period, made we of very gross expressions, imputing to the plaintiff that he had had criminal conver sation with the defendant's wife.—The Jury found a ver dict for the plaintiff—Damages, 1001. SALISBURY, MARCH 9. Henry Wilkins, aged 21, was put to the bar upon a charge of having, on the night of the 20th of November last, at South-park, in this county, feloniously set fire to a cottage, the property of William Peachy, Esq.—Guilty. Mr. Justice PARE pronounced upon the prisoner the sentence of death, declaring at the same time that it would most cei tainly he earned into execution. .haac Nash, aged 28, was put to the bar upon a simi lar charge, but the evidence offered on the part of the pro secution tended, after the cross-examination of the wit aesse-, to prove rather t!:e prisoner's innocence than his guilt. The Learned Judge therefore directed the Jury to acquit him, which they accurdingly did. The number of prisoners remaining for trial is consi derable, and the offences of which they are charged are for the most part of a very serious character. H UNTINGD ON, Blanch 9. Walter Peck, Esq. was indicted fur an a.,atlit on Mr. G. Hewitt. The Jury returned a verdict of Guilty, and the learned Judge advised the respective counsel to settle the dispute. This, however, could not he arranged. The calestd .r for this county contains the names of not fewer than 60 persons, who are charged with the offence of machine-breaking. The offences are alleged to have been committed some months ago, during the general dis turbinces ; they were not tried at the quarter sessions, in consequence of the noble Secretary for the Home Depart ment deeming it fairer towards the accused that they should not be tried before the local magistracy, at a period when the country was in a state of universal ferment. They are all in the situation of labourers in husbandry, with the exception of a miller and a wheelwright. The wheat every where looks admirably ! the blade strong, and of good colour. I made a point of inquiring into the truth of the report that the sheep had died exten sively by the rot, and I do not find any ground for the re port, except in a very few places in the lower pert of the county. There is not the least disturbance either in this or the adjoining counties among the labouring population. CHEL MSF OR D, dTe xcrr 10. Wm. Eve was indicted for a burglarious entry into an out-house of George Buckstone, kt Shenfield, and inflict ing diec.s wounds with a clearer on the head of Mr. Buck stone. The prisoner called a witness to prove an alibi; but the Jury, without hesitation, found him guilty. The lest ned JUDGE passed sentence of death upon him, and told him not to indulge in the remotest hope of mercy. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. BOTV-STREET. The application made last week on behalf of Mr. Sampayo, the Portuguese Consul, for summonses against the Chevalier D'Abreu e Lima, and that gentleman's porter, was renewed yesterd .y by Mr. Alley, who grounded hie application on the 42d of Geo. 111., cap. 81, sec. 4, which provides, " that if any person shall wilfully secre'e or detain any lettee'cr packet forwarded through the General Post-office, and left by accident or mistake at the house of such person, he or she shall be liable to he fined or imprisoned. The Alagistrate (Mr. Mnisu um.) said, he retained his former opinion and that of his brother Magistrates, that he had no power to grant a summons in the case ; because, although the seals of the despatches had been opened, there was no proof as to who broke them. After some discussion as to whether the Magistrates could take cognizance of the case under the Act of Parliament referred to, Mr. Mptsnur.r. said, he had no objection under all the circumstances to send for the Pest-office messengers and receive their evidence as to the delivery of the despatches, and their having been subsequently ap plied for. This would be a preliminary step to the in vestigation, which might be pursued further, if the evi dence should be found sufficient to make out a case for granting a summons. The clerk was then directed to write to Sir Francis Freeling, reques}ing him to allow the letter-carriers and messengers to appear to give evidence touching this matter. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. Yesterday Sir William Alexander, the late Chief Baron of the Exchequer, came to this office, and stated to Mr. 11°4, the sitting Magistrate, that he had just been robbed in the street of his gold watch (a repeater), gold chain, and three gold seals attached, together with his purse, containing four sovereigns. The venerable Judge stated, that he had been out taking his usual walk, and totally unmindful of the Queen's drawing-room being held that day, he got into Pall-mall, and was in the midst of a crowd b;,fore he had time to perceive the difficulty of his situa tion, and in an instant he was surrounded and hustled by a number of fellows, who robbed him of the property above described. Mr. ROE was extremely sorry to hear of the occurrence, and hoped that the respected Judge did not experience any personal violence from the ruffians who had robbed him. Sir William received no other violence than the hustling and jostling he met with from the thieves while they were robbing him; but being rather feeble, even that inconve nienced him a little. Mr. Rob then directed that the particulars of the rob bery, with a description of the watch, &c., should be taken down in the clerk's office, and in the daily police circular ; but he could not, he regretted, hold out to Sir William any hopes of the recovery of his property. Sir William supposed there was but little chance of that. The watch he said was made for him by Molineux, De vonshire-street, Queen-square, whose name was on it, but he did not recollect the number of the watch. Six prisoners, who are in custody charged with being concerned in the burglary and robbery at the house of Messrs. Machin and Debenham, the auctioneers in King street, Covent-garden, underwent an examination, and the evidence of a number of witnesses tending to connect the prisoners with the robbery, was taken down by Mr. Fitz patrick, the chief clerk ; but as there is some material evidence still in the back ground, the prisoners were all reinarde I for final examination on a future day, before which time it is not deemed proper for the ends of justice that the particulars, which are very remarkable, should be published. " Captain BEECHEY'S Narrative of his Voyage to the Pacific," respecting which such high anticipations have bee❑ formed, will, it seems, certainly be published on Monday next. The embellishments, from the burin of Fn.; DEN, are executed in a style of peculiar excellence ; the most curious of these are several picturesque views in Pitcairn's Island—a portrait of the noted patriarch of ad venture, Jour{ ADAMS --an attack of the Natives of Gambier Island—heads of some natives of the coast near Cape Thomson—Californians engaged in the singular exercise of throwing the lasso—the Esquimaux moths of disposing of their dead—and souse views in Loo Choo. A Map and Chart likewise accompany the Work. Abingdon........ Agmondrsham. Aldborough Aldeburgh , Andover Appleby Arundel.-- Ashburton Aylesbury.... Banbury Barnstaple Bath Beautnaris.... Bedford Bedwin, Great. Beeralston Berwick..., Beverley Bewdley Bishop's Castle] Blotch ingley, 80chnin........ Boroughbridge Bossiney Boiton Brackley Brarnber , 8rec0n......... Bridgenorth... Bridgewatik... Bristol Buckingham... Bury St. Ed . miind'd Callingtou Caine....... Cambridgo Cainelford Canterbury.... Card i n' Cardigan Carlisle Carmarthen... Can tar von ...... Cantle Rising.. Cheoter.. ..... .... Chichester-- Chippenham— Christchurch ~ C1ither0e........ Cockermoutli., Colchester.— Corte Castle... Coventry Crick lade Dartmouth Denbigh ...... ... Derby DE6nm. ..... Dorchester Dover Downton Droitwich Dunwich Durham.... Evesham ...... Exeter Eye Flint... ..... :••••., Fowey G.ttton Gloucester Grantham. Gritusby ...... East Grinstead Guildford..., Helston Harwich ..... . , liasleine re Hastings Haverfordwest Hedon Hereford 11ertf0rd....... ley tesbury..... HighamFerrers Hindon ....... 1innit0n......... liorsham ..... Huntingdon...., ilythe 'pswich Ilchester , King's Lynn , Kingston-upon Hull Knaresborough Lancaster...". Launceston.... Leicester Leominster...... Lewe5......—.... Linc01n....,..,.,, lAskcard,",,,"i 1114 .494 4724 3. 46'21 1134 125 ~~ ~;~ 1060 .232 1128 1143/ I 6 2768 151/ 4470 it2titi ON 3516/ 582 474 :IS 1171 746 . 1 .310 7:".6 *734 •444 *656 15-1 163 1909 Cannot aster. 11'6627 2145 414 PARLIAMENTARY PAPER. RETURN RELATING TO PARLIAMEN TARY REPRESENTATION. A Statement of the number of Houses, in 1821, in each City, Borough, and Town, sending Members to Parliament, in Eng land and Wales, and of the greatest number of Electors polled at any Election within the same, during the last :10 years, so far as the same can be ascertained from the Returning Officers. City, Borough or Town. lsouse,l Electors Polled. OBSERVATIONS, ...*This number comprises the whole parish of Amersham, of which the borough is only a ❑art, the numbers within the borough cannot be distin guished. There has been no election poll within themetnory of man. The limits are rather less extensive than stated in the population returns. There are 24 electors in all. ...Theborough extends further than stated in the population returns. No pollhasbeen taken in the last 30years.— Vide Lists of Burgesses in the Mayor's Letter. —..,..... . '23 others were rejected. 1 ...The number of freeholders I is supposed to be about 300. jThe limits are less extensive than stated in the population returns. The freeholders of the three Hundreds of Aylesbury possess the right of voting. The total number of electors in 1830 was 731. The limits are more ex tensive than those stated in the population returns. The number of electors is about IzO. The limits are less than those stated in the populationreturns. The totall Resident 527 number of Non-resident 616 voters i 5..... _ 1,14.3 * Of whom about 870 were resident in the borough. There has not been a con. tested election during the last 30 years. The Members are returned by the Corporation. The limits are not precisely the same as stated in the po pulation returns. The limits are less than stated in the population returns. The total number of voters is 33. 1 The limits are rather more extensive than stated in the population returns. }l'he limits di fli!r from those stated in the population re turns. ...The borough and parish are co-extcnsive; but the parish is divided into three parts, only one of which possesses the right of voting. The number of per sons entitled to vote at the last election was about 4CO. ...Many of the burgesses are non-resident; upwards of 1,2.00 non-residents out of the 6,338. There are 13 electors in all. The number of electors is 37. • At the present time. The limits differ from those stated in the population returns. The limits differ from those stated in th e populationreturns. * Of which 5 «ere objected to. The limits are less tlian those stated in the population returns. The population returns give 2,506 houses . This includes the votes of the seven contributory bo. roughs. The votes polled at Cardiff only were 116. ...There are two contributory boroughs with Cardigan. The votes of the three amounted to 1,196. ...The limits areless than stated in thepopulation returns; those returns include the suburbs. (Four boroughs contribute with Carnarvon in returning the Member. ...The limits include three pa rishes more than stated in the population returns. About6o electors remained unpolled. The limits are lees extensive than stated in the population returns. ditto ditto ' , There having been no eon. test in the last 30 years. 1 The limits are less exten -sive than stated in the popu , Winn returns. * In the hundred and borough. ...The letter of the'Town Clerk enters fully into the right of voting claimed by the inhabi. tants. 1...1he limits are more exten sive than statwd in the popula- tion returns. Two other bo roughs contribute with Den_ bigh in sending a Member to Parliament. The limits differ slightly from those stated in the pc, pulation returns. The number of electors is 40. • About half of those who have a right to vote. The hilts are more exten sive than those stated in the population returns. ...The present number of elec tors is supposed to be about 4‘27, of whom only 136 are resident. ...In 1790, 1,Y65 electors were polled. The present estimated number of electors is at least 1,300. ...Flint and its contributory boroughs contain at the pre sent time 1,217 electors. *At the present time. Six Toted at the last election. _ _ • Of this number, about 1,0:16 resided out of the limits of the city. ..As stated in the population returns. The number in the borough was rather less,. ....In the whole parish. The borough is believed to contain about one-third of the parish. The limits differ in a small degree from those given in the population returns. The limits are less than those stated in the populationreturns. The limits exceed those stated in the population returns. The Wliole number of elec tors is about 500. ...The limits are rather more extensive than those stated in the population returns. ."ACcording to the popula tion returns ; but the limits of the borough are different, ac cording to the statement of the Returning Officer. The limits are considerably less than stated in the popu lation returns. There are two houses lees in the borough than the po pulation returns state. .._. The population returns term flindon a parish ; the Return ing °nicer states it tobe within the parish of East Knoyle. The limits are less extensive than stated in the population returns. . . 1 here are about 180 electors in all. ...The limits arc more exten sive than those stated in the population returns, which give only 42-4 houses. *Of whom nearly 400 were resident. ...The population returns in clude the parish of St. Ed mund's in the borough; but the Mayor states it has no con nection with the borough. It contains 31(5 houses. The linntsare less:than stated in the population returns. The limits differ from those stated in the population re_ turns. ...Tie borough is not co-ex_ temive w.th thetown,a4stated in the population returns. *Houses in the town. •From 12 to 20 voters more did not poll. The limits are less than stated in the population returns. •343 No poll taken in the last 30 years. 888 No poll Ithe last3o year!, No poll in the last 30 I !years. I Ditto *1420 183 No con tog in the last 30yrs. tio poll in ithelast3o ;years. Ditto 260 63S 153 •135 26 #702 cal I No poll in ;thelast3o 'years. Ditto 1541 .768 i Very few. 1406 x. 'th ,years. '01)0111n le last 30 2763 1188 tiopollinl thelast:3ol years. 30 2,39 129 ,The poll book are *1763 78 9.0 Very few. Itio poll in the last3o !years. !No con_ test dur- Ing the last3oyrs. Ditto *lOO3 2490 No poll in the last 30 years, *7Ol OBSERVATIONS, City, Borough,' or Town. Lich field Liverpool.... East L00e.... West Looe.. London Lostwithiel. Ludgershall, Ludlow Lyme Lymington.. :Ilaidstone..., Ma1d0n....... Malmesbury Halton.., Marlborough Marlow ..... MidhurA Milborne Port., Minehead„..., Monmouth Montgomery Morpeth Newark........ Newcastle .un der. Lyme Newcastle - on. Tyne Newport (Corn. wall) ... Newport (Weal Wight)......... Newton (lan_! cashire)........' Newton (Isle o f NVight)........ Northidlerton Northampton, Norwich Nottingham Okeilampton. Orford Oxford Pembroke.— Penryn.......— Peterborough, Plymouth__ Plympton Earle' Pontefract Poole Portsmouth_ Preston Queenborough New Radnor Reacting Reigate...—. Retford and Hundred of Bassetlaw Richmond ..... Ripon Rochester New Itomney Rye St. Alban'i.... M. Germans.. Sr, Ives St. Dl4w•es St. Michael...., Salta.sh Sandwich .... .. Salisbury, of New Sarum., Old Sarum Scarborough Seaford Shaftesbury Shoreham Sh rewsbur y...., Southampton., Southwark..... Stafford Stamford Steyning Stockbridge..." 5udbury......... Tamworth...... Tavistock.. ..... Taunton Tewkesbury Thetford Think Tiverton Totness Tregony.. Truro... ....... Wallingford — Wareham. ...... Warwick Welts...—. ...... Wendover , Wenlock Weobley NVc.3tbury Housed V24),339 107 17,533 , 206 116/ 4101(/'417 '2276 605 Westminster , Weymouth Whitchurch Wigan Wilton WincheLsea 488/ 494 *Z4 .302 New Wood- stock NVootton Buser Worcester cm Not !known, „4 567 k Wycombe...—. 11,031 7670 Great Yar mouth Yarmouth (Isle of Wight) York 315 214 2520 ea 9 983 262 :s4 960 1180 8506 4229 175 748 178 1583 217 5443 2249 Cannot be stated. 1013 919 .127{ 60'2 la 230 Electors Polled. .;t53 1 Nopoll in thelast3o years. .16 Novoll in , the hist 30 years. I No pull i the last: 'years. 75'2 3113 Not stat ed. 1 ;No con- , (test in the last 30yrs. 381 INo coo.l test in thel last 30y rs. ; 2a I thelast3o' years. ,1910 4'20'2 4051 j 257 • Nopoll in the lakt3o years. 1779 1401 *r49 4 Itio poll ,taken in' 'the last 30 years. 841 (a) No poll in the last 30 years. *lll *The whole number of voters was not polled. The houses and inhabitants riregreatly increased since 1S:21. The limits are not the same 35 stated in the population re turns. The limits exceed those stated the population returns. •Polled to try the validity of certain votes. • In the parish ; the num bers in the borough are r, ther less. The limits not so extensive as stated in the population returns. Houses and inhabitants much increased since 1821. The limits are more exten sive than stated in the popula. tion returns. There are now about 625 electors. The number of votes polled has not exceeded 10. At the present time. file limits are rather less extensive than stated in the population returns. ....At the present time. The borough is not co-extensive with the parish. ...The limits differ from those 'given in the population re turns, but the Returning Offi cers are unable to state the number of houses in the bo rough. Newport and Usk are con tributory with Monmouth in returning a member. * Many electors did not vote. The number of electors about 800. The total number of freemen is about 4,00 g, of whom nearly three-fourths are resident. The limits are not so exten sive as stated in the popula. tion returns. The limits are rather more extensive than stated in the population returns. The present number of electors is about 52. . . The 'limits are much less extensive than stated in the population returns. • A bout 400 voters remain unrolled. The limits are rather less than those stated in the popu. lation returns. !...Two other boroughs contri bute with Pembroke in sending a member to Parliament. 861. 667 No poll in the last3o years. *About 25 electors did not vote. The limits are much less ex. 'tensive than those stated in the population returns. The limits are greater than stated in the population re turns. The limits are not so exten isive as stated in the population !returns. The whole number of free men is 300 and upwards. ...In 17110, 99.2 voters were I polled, and 116 rejected, being the whole number of electors. There are now upwards of 3,001 houses within the limits of the borough. The last contested election occurred in 1722, when hr voters were polled. • Of this number 96 were burgesses, and the rest free holders. There are 315 bur gesses in all. Many voters re mained Impelled. The limits are less than stated in the population returns. 148 3667 1181 ...The number of electors !does not exceed 30. The limits !are less than stated in the po_ pulation returns. ...(a) At the last election some voters were polled to try the right olvoting. There had not bee.) a contest since 173 t. The limits are not so extensive as stated in the population returns. I •Forty-five other votes were (tendered, but being doubtful were rejected. ...At present there are about 635 out-resident freemen, and 320 in-resident freemen. Total, !955. _ . la 140 * The Afenthers of the Cor. poration. The limits Ices than stated in population returns. The right of voting is exer cised by the freeholders of the Rape of &amber. The limitsless extensive than stated in the population re turns. The limits less extensive than stated in the population re. turns. ... 4 At the present time. The limits rather less exten sive than stated in the popu lation returns. The limits less extensive than stated in the population re- I turns. a Ac-1 cording' toacor. rected return since receiv ed. 19ME, 268{1 3288 293 There arc now about 470 voters. The limits are less extensive than stated in the population !returns. ditto ditto. The limitslessextensivethan !stated in the population re t.urns. (a) At present. The whole number of elee itors is 25. There are 103 burgesses in all. The elective franchise is ;vested in the Mayor and 24 capital burgesses. The limits less than stated ' in the population returns. The number of voters at the !present time about 1,400. The limits less extensive than stated in the population returns. ditto ditto. 117 *uss No poll in 'the last 3(1! • About 200 burgesses re. mained unpolled. years. Ditto Cannot !be stated. 3'79 2926 519{ 755 iNopoll in ithe last 30 years. The liinits less extensive than stated in the population returns. ditto ditto. In 1818,5,339 electuripolled fur unc candidate. Thelimits less extensive than stated in thepopulationreturns. The limits more extensive than stated in the population returns. The number of Voters is about 800 '2173 140. The limits are not the same as stated in the population re. turns. The limits not so extensive as stated in the population re turns. I No poll in the last3o years. *1702 The greatest number of burgesses has been 124. ...* Of whom 773 were non resident. The limits exceed those stated in the population returns, The Deputy Licencer, it seems, demands a fee of two guineas Wore a Single song can be introduced upon the stage, HER MAJESTY'S SECOND DRAWIS' 1 1,„ 4-t'; Ii 0". o urt Ilo o} day, c u l e , et w t , l t i s e v l, ( l .r h y c , S n e n c e o r i o ul , s l i ) y ra a w tt i 1 , t , 0 L 0 ni T a b t a t , r i were the same as those at the celebration ()Cher ty )4Z t h day. f the Ak7 At one o'clock the Queen received the Ministers _Bon' man Protestant Churches in London, in the Drawhto Hof N.Nti her private resilience. Her Majesty was attended by nt the Queen's Chamberlain ; the Earl of Errol, her ' l ;dy! Master of the Horse; and the Countess of Mayo, tr,'„ log; 4;- . 11,,, s Waiting. The Deputation was headed by the Iles' 11,': St the Rev. Mr. Schwabe, Mr. J. G. Tiarks, and Mr. b"i ) „,,en, Ic! Rev. Dr. Kuper presented and read an Address to th e u ) , 3 nio e which her Majesty was pleased to return a most graei , o_ rre! At one o'clock the King received the Duke of Suf , :',", i ',; ( l i7s.}l dent of the Royal Society, and the following Otficets a' hers of the Council : i Itti Colonel Fitzclarence, Sir A stley Cooper, Mr. Barre or 13,010, Li Rennie, 1)r. Philip Mr. Davies Gilbert, Mr. Profe: s i f itit# 4, 4 'AR( Mr. Peacock, Mr. Pond, Dr. Roget, Mr. Children, . 3 ' l. * Mr. Hudson, Mr. Ellis, Mr. Vigors and Mr. Koni. „. he The Deputation was received in the Royal Closet i e iosta i of Sussex addressed the King on the importance of t he 0 „1 Lion ; to which his Majesty replied, promising his '4'4 YSz laudable and national an establishment, and enrollee g o ceT t . eat the book of Records of the Institution as Patron. Theiescee, carried before the Corporatior", which was presented t o t ' l o f Ce" ,,, Ni;• Lra by King Charles 11., it having belonged td the House ro, ki 9 ' 1 11 mo ns summarily a Members dissolved bv Cromis ell. then Po Th z s The same nd Officers of the Royal Socioti eo to , D , Rey ceeded to the Queen's residence, and presented an ad dr .ode a r e Majesty on her accession. Her Majesty, who was tog, ki; Ant arl Howe, the Earl of Errol, and her Ladies , turned a gracious answer to the address. r oillr of Ury t s The Queen proceeded to the St a t e R ooms to hold I t ieel' io I L L P e , Room, accomp an i e d b y th e Ki ng, an d atten d e d by the sta til' t ,, e",ZY Ca State and other attend an t s . H er M a j es ty t oo k her. 14;',' tic front of the Throne. Th e Ki ng s t oo d t o th e r i g ht of 01 ' s fit attended by Lord Byron, as L or d i n W a iti ng , and the .0 Sj r • Gra. Henry Blackwood, as Groom in Waiting. 1 h s ' 1 2 1 Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Kent, !attend e . t ;t: , t 1,,,t )1a Catherine Jenkinson and Sir J o h n C onroy , arrived er lb s 1 5 " Y Ca two Highness was p received escorted by by thewith d the band of the Ist Regiment o f F o ot G uar d s playing itNtr, y lit the Kin" fer e to Cni r Majesties first received the Royal Family, t oe me Nti St, j Ambassadors, and Ministers, and their Ladies, and t 4,.%1101 have the privilege of the Entree, viz. : of t, lO The Duke and Duchess of Cumberland, the Duche4sbla,,,, Nor; t the Princess Augusta, the Landgravine of Hesse 110 1 _," Prince Leopold ; the Russian Ambassador, and Prinee'lotO r lo 1,4 of 1 the Netherlands Ambassador and Madame Feick, the . 0. kr: ," . qC French, and Brazilian Ambassadors ; Mad.,me 40. 8 . Lady of the Spanish Minister, the Swedish Minister, a- 1,0 di, "te t ..,,,,at ar tess 13jornstjerna, the Neapolitan Minister and Counte'; ‘ ,o;: t) , r,:ya the Prussian, Danish, Sardinian, and Bavarian i‘bollor,,b' ,fecf' Archbishops of Canterbury and York, the Lord Chance for 4 First Lord of the Treasury, the Secretaries of State Home and Foreign Departments, the Chancellor of th e ( ' C l 5, , t'att quer, the President of the Board of Controul, the Lo ri ' ph berlain, the Groom of the Stole, the Master of the Rev t~ Marquis Clanricarde Captain of the Yeoman Guard; r ti lie,, I",r. t ~, the Captain of the Gentlemen Pensioners, the q,m; Justice of England, the Paymaster of the Forces t letro. Advocate General, the Attorney-General, thevice-Co-,0 ' l , oh: the Treasurer of the Household, Lord Hill, Gold StiNote r hug; Colonel Cavendish, Silver Stick in Wai t ing ; the • Lad w. the Ceremonies, and Mr. Monk, the Exon in WaitiOg* Lk,j Among the general company were— Duke of Rutland. d oe. t ot , Au g DUCHESSES—R_oxburshe, Dowager Richmond, PC 01,101 t ry e's MAROU' - • - lr3 jo° J. • • n • ROOM. ,_ MARQUISES—Downshire, Ely, Jndonderry. „0 0 4 MA RCH I 0 NESSES—Londontkrry, Downshire, L°. t, Ps, EARLS—Belfast, Ilchester, Neuburg, Leitrim, Sell,lls, A nor, Charlemont, Vernlain, Mansfield, Stanhope, Jolt% fe herst, Mountcharles, Shaftesbury, Aberdeen, Spencer. to m les COUNTESSES—Tankerville, Selkirk, Dowager Is l °„ t ,lis i ts s rulam, Bathurst, Delawarr, Carlisle, Aberd een , 31 00 '• o f$ s s Amherst, Haddington, Ilche s te r , M ans fi e ld, D o wager se wick, Cavan, Mount Norris, Ch ar l emo nt, E rro l, De Salis, .i. VISCOUNTS—Sidmouth, Maynard, Encombe, sydneY'j, sl' VISCOUNTESSES—Combermere, Tumour, 31aYn3r sit mouth. LORDS—FoIey, Byron, 'Bexley, Hill, John ItusselVs ~ r'• James O'Brien, Somerville, Sallow', Tenterdcn, NV. -011 11. Loughborough, Brabazon, Mahon, Marcus Hill, King , GeorRI GgeHTH Hill, ItendONOUIesRABLES—C ham, Douro, harles Grims Grant ton. 0•0 0 't HONOURABLES—Mrs. Elliott, Miss Maynard, Robert . pl. rd, Mi is u l ;,l lll' nard, Mrs. E. Moore, Mrs. John Talbot, Miss Turn° t. vi, Philips, Miss Cavendish, Miss C. Cavendish, Mrs. Itusbo l3 iir] l ,ll, Hope, ;Mrs. P. Pleydell Bouverie, Mrs. Vansittart, i'l l .'' al Mrs. Villiers, Mrs. Neave, Lady Cockerell, Capt. (~CO. ( j i Casitain Grey, Hugh Cholmondeley. Count St. Paul. Bishop of Chicester. Sri / LADIES—How Douglas, D owa g e r Ar u nd e l], Hulse , ~ Bouverie, Isabella Douglas, 31ildmay, Trotter, Gertru]R;s s so s s Stanley, Caroline Murray, Dalrymple, Sarah Amherst, ISS I. Farnborough Juliana Anneslev, Montfort, Wrottesl e :l4,'• Macfarlane, ' King, Isabella Biachford, Westphal, C r i e sailli s % Caroline Bathurst, Dowager Kinloch, Warburton, `IV] •fie re. Dowager Sheffield, Caroline Dundas, Charlotte Grev] Jar' ' e ,s! Elizabeth Steele, Lucy Eleanor Lowther, Sewell, J. - C''',i 4 ! George Seymour, Phipps Nugent, Bateson, Whaniclitlevr„. Nicolson, Elizabeth Palk, James O'Bryen, (»loins ], I 1./ , „ Hamilton, Howden, Loughborough, Cecilia InderWlLF ager Kilmaine, Augusta Baring, Lucy Pusey, G. Bathn,ils• ford, Williams, Franklin, Jolliffe, Rendlesham, George s . ) . Glynne, Imhoff, Paul, Elizabeth Murray, Aldis, Elie. s•• G. Murray. MlSTRESSES—Fitzclarence, Whatley, G. Stanhope, Riley, Stanley, Cavendish, Bean Standish O'Grady, Mellish, Henry Murray, Sopi Edwards Vaughan, Lister, George Digby, Stepnr grew, Bell, Chas. Kemys Tynte, Baring, Gardi Knight, Roharts, Pearce, Paul, Edmund Hughes, We»tworth Beaumont, A. G. Stal Chambers, Howard, Fuller, Henry Moreton Ussher, Bertie Mathew, Moore, Fanshawe, J. son, Basil Hall, Tennyson, Henry Clive, Vansi Wilson, Pearson. MlSSES—Whatley, C. Williams Wynn, I Wynn, Bateson, Palk, Quentin, F. Cavendish, mour, Haddington (two), Trotter, Orby Huntci Edwards Vaughan, Murray, Nugent, Matilda Stanley, Frederica Sloane Stanley, Hope, Gi Mash, Harriet Mash, Glynne, Maria Glynne, Us craft, Mary Wrottesley, Douglas, Helen Do] Douglas, Bertie Mathew, Nina de Salle, B. ' Gardiner, Laura Gardiner, Mildmay, M. Mc Swettenham ' Jemima Wilson, Beaumont, V Vansittart, Stopford, Corry, Ridley, Tommy, Kinloch, Baring, Marianne Beaumont, Pusey, 1. SIRS—C. Trotter, John Paul, A. Halliday, G. Wynn, G. B. Pocock, J. G. cotterell, W' Bulkeley, Dudley Hill, James Scarlett, Johl Philips, it. Vivian, Charles Lemon, H. L. Aldis, Mathew Ridley, Charles H. Coote, Jervis, John Dean Paul, Robert Bateson, Ow Stracey, J. S. Forbes, Win. Dundas, J. Wilson ; G. Cockerel. DEANS—Chichester, Carlisle. REV. DOCTORS—Kuper, Schwabe, Sleath, REV. MESSRS.—Charles Mackie, C. Nepean. J. G. Ward, Charles Busse, G. Tiarks, A. Eger' Peacock, Archdeacon of Cambridge, E. Moore, a DOCTORS-.Macmichael, Southey, Roget, Meyrick , MESSRS.—Charles Hancock, E. Vaughan, Brandelin Hope, M.P., Paul, Wilkie, it.A., 0 Hunter, St. J 3 1,0 Upton, A. NV. Blanc, G. Knight, John Forbes, J. 1 , I Stanley, Henry Clive, M.P., Frost, Mills, Edmun d, . $ Lubbock, Philips, C. Bosanquet, Woods, Colegrave , `' l'i• 'l'ynte, Charles O'Neil Corry, Vizard, Augustus KniP e r ! Sh', Edward Phipps, P. Pleydell Bouverie, Grayston, Eistei e ttii Conway, Antrobus, Charles Mackinnon, M.P., Riley, sir V. Hughes Hughes, M.P., Raine. s.sing] AD MlRALS—Hardyman, C. 13., Horton, E. a ar', s Kin GE lo,4 lll Williams. i. QNEßALS—Sir Howard Douglas, Sir William Sir W, Parker Carrol, Calcraft, Clitheroe, Sir Georg e r olco Sir R. M'Farlane, Frederick Maitland, Sewell, Sir J. '0, 4 0 1 • K.C.8., Eden, 31acbean, Earl of Cavan, Armstrong' Or ' i n ce 4 Kerr Grant, Milner, Cuppage, Sir Robert Wilson, $ . „ . Hon. Phi pp: , e O ,ll Vs COLONELS—Sir Charles Thornton, Poten, Ca`,, s lis s ,s' sr i , Robert Gardiner, O'Reilly, Hughes, O'Malley, Sir A• " sSI , ,4, 1 44 Douglas, Elphinstone, Roberts, Sir Octavius CareY' ,tl4 :a's Currey, Brotherton, 1 31 ''#' °]] MAJORS—WeIIs Eden, Baring, Hyde. „, I i COMMA NDERSL-Charles Greene, 31. Phillips, s/..:ifser sd tIY Sir Thomas Thompson, George Evans, Tonikinst D P` n l. salt, Brunnen. joh li ssc I, CAPTAINS—Fitzroy, Houston, Hon. H. Duncan, OW: O Y s; mer, Douglas, Hamilton, Edward Lloyd, R.N., 1 1 ?P e ' . .1 , 'is, 'l; 4, s, Gould, Chipechase, Sir J. A. Westphal, R.N., 11°1 jelf; ' i ~'• s; s! sh , R,N., Somerville, RN., Mildmay, Nugent, Ashmor e, 1 0 , , e %''° 0 • , 0, I. clerk, Willoughby Cotton, Mendell, R.N. ' t * I I ]ts., LIEUTENANTS—Hon. David Murray, Roher,,, , tti,,s I, I, J. N. Frampton, C. J. Robinson, E. T. Hodgson, I •? ' ,.say'sto :St„ ek. wood, Eaton, Bevan, It. Basset, Moorsom—Cornet It „ssO d st ', %. 1 We only give the names of some of the Gentlemco , ,r so ey most of them were at his Majesty's Levee on the pres]v The following were presented : Countess Selkirk, by Siscountess Hampden sS , Miss Douglas, by the Countess Dowager of Morton,, it it t oll Sit s Slas si Lady Isabella Douglas, by her mother, Countess Selo Ma liss'ilka ' Lady (Howard) Douglas, by the Countess Dowager ° I , l ' i t t e h ' t ; 1 Miss Trotter, by Lady Trotter • tit $4l - 0r " C hiss n t ° e s r sb y of ft Hunter, by t t, ll ebyMtahrechci.ounienses Countess 'cesatrnlifiaetli - 1 V 1 ,,' 41 ' i Miss Baring, by Mrs. Bqsing ,„Si! t k , no, Mrs. Stanley, by Mrs. flamer „ esi a , d o st, il ss,,, i ! Sir Andrew Halliday, Deputy Inspector of AnnY r' , e 017,',1 N e o f ' , f ylt s t his promotion, by Earl Howe r the l isp s i 4 ~!4]. Mr. Charles Hancock, on beinssappointed Exams 0 t se s gt] ots f 'leo of the Guard (vice W. R. \\luting, resigned) by ,Or I ttio s T - Clanricarde ell' ll'' tSA t ti li t Colonel Sir Charles Thornton, on receiving the Gu S k 40 ( and to kiss the Queen's hand 04, , 4t) The Judge Advocate-General, by Lord Melbourne t i o stlOD ' Si,,t l Of 1 1 ) , Miss Helen Douglas, by the Countess Dowager of,;:y es to s o a t i s Viscountess Combennere, by the Marchioness of ' ' 4 t o Lady Trotter, by the Duchess of Gordon n ft" '' ''' lit A Miss Edwards Vaughan, by Mrs. Edwards Vaugh 3- fA , , 11 ,15,' - e Miss Harcourt Douglas, by the Countess Dowager s sc e i' , s ll t N . , as s 'll a Viscount Sydney, by the Lord Chamberlain to th e ri p ,, i 11, 1 I.ady Paul, by the Countess of Verulam L i dY A 'I e l Hon. Mrs. Neave, by her mother, the Dowager ,' i • k tic] Lady Nicholson, by the Hon. Mrs. Elliot th 1 i • 4 1 6! Mrs. George Leigh, by the Marchioness of Westin ° f t4 40: 1 1 41 ) Mrs. Davies, by her mother, Mrs. Whatley , s oCI 1 Lady Williams, by Lady Frances Honiara NNIP . S Hon. Mrs. John Talbot, on her marriage, by 1-. 3 "' ter Ladybliss Sloane Mildmay, sta üblse•yt,he by u,e DowagerC ountess Countess o $ Is ' V e" tr s • 4, l 'sx; Lady Jollitli., by Mrs. Berkeley Paget Countess of Cavan, by the Countess of Errol 00' A ''lsli Lady Conte, by the Countess of Charlemont st er 0 0 il : , ,it, Miss Mildmay, by the Dowager Countess of Bebe..., t he ,Ss t ,as able Band of Gentlemen Pensioners, by Sir George Ilartholomew Pocock, Standard-bearer _l ey t o , ~, :i,,, ,1 ,4 Lord I ° 00 sil l t 4 .4 WI 141 I) Lady Cecilia Underwood, on changing her ]] r i co a „ r( k k Lady Isabella Douglas, by Viscountess Hampdean e, by alt 4,‘ jesty's most gracious permission, by the Conn]. h ~, i e Miss Mary Glynne, by Lady Wynne s„ . , 'I 'stay Mrs. Pettigrew b Lady Montfort s sli le S, , Mrs. Bertie Mathew, by time Countess of Errol of c- o t . Lady Gertrude Sloane Stanley, by the Countess „sr° A'lsi s i Mrs. Paul, by the Countess of Verulam 0 , ' 3 " ~,tt , _ e Lady Glynne, by the Countess of Denbigh ifust l) s s4 s 4 Mrs. Coulson, on her marriage, by Lady (San' ISI • Sir John Dean Paul by the Earl of Verulam , Jo p tOrdt%s of Carlisle Lady Wrottesley, by the Countess of Denbignown, ,eOOl d o 0 , 4 Lady Denman, by the Marchioness of Lans u f Lans ' t he ' iskt ll l l , 4 sl Mrs. ;Mellish, by the Dowager Marchioness 0 ) ,,)0 to tr.l ss 41 Sir Coutts Trotter, Bart. by the Lord Charnit,, ro se N ' '` i ti ,: . l l ' Lady Elizabeth Steele, by the Duchess of Isl " 1 4 hs tli ' l Sir George Philips, by the Duke of Norfolk is 4t t ,s, Miss Valli, by the Countess Verulam br ~ 4 T 1 VVh Mrs. Henry Clive, by the Duchess of Nort%u_r, a to u ss, ' \ I li r e s. C' Baring , otiiit ess Mrs. Standish O'Grady, by Mrs. Berkeley 1 g' iS Lady Sewell, by the 'Viscountess Turnour b], \ , , ‘" Miss Glynne, by Lady Wynne bzetiha,evalSrlra,reblynottaieescs Countess .Latersisstr Liqyeo,l,,,,giti.l; • t s.l Mr. Gaily Knight, by Lord St. Helen's , h i r e ' b t Miss Batcson, by the Marchioness of Dovi t , y nne Mrs. Edmund Currey, by Lady Elizabeth! Sir Edward Stracey, by the Earl of Shaftesbury Miss Hulse, by Lady Hulse Mrs. Nugent, Macfarlane , onher marriage, by the 3 a .tsl /1 Surrey Mrs. Gaily Knight, by the Countess of ~, pao Miss Corry, by Mrs. Beaumont Mrs. n 10" Ladyrs. Bell, a f t. Noo, Marchioness b . e c r I L,r a c ri h g isodnoess s:e o f pi Lady Sim,tlyvtyliet;agloArliroSwmoywtrhieb,ybytiViorcniiionod 0 14 • ; l ai . (=Dr, •(; " .tai‘t; t' k q .1%.. 0 • p pie!,;4 i 94 U M sti c . Leigh, ~ ..074, 1, tin 4,l 3K auinont, )11 4 eh Sophia V 3 ,","fr',,,, diner, Cowel"col, tp , clr, diner, Cu ff 4,o4(, u rreY, v.iO A , h. 0 . , spleton '414 a r m I)ye, (1:„; J. A. c • Kt, .sittart, Le i g Harriet er, Maria 'slos r ( rtiz la Paget,' (3.iffortl, L'cl i t; 4 l, 14, 4, 4 CiO Ussher, Douglas,, 60 7 ;j, Vl 4 i,oss, Hulse, P...spg, l o, !elfish, 3".1,o01, Vansit tart , yson, ll' G. - .NaY'' ir0, 1, ,..1 4 li, l 11). William *or? (:,; Vi z tit hu Sewel l, clig f j . 14' t 'ei a ,rd L. B a ker, 1 4 . ft,, t`,llt, lit A. ti'er‘ a 'en tarles Htitifir Stephen " g l , Aro h, Grey, ',coot-0 Sir c74l„, Alle ri .jgo 6 o' ell*, • rton Br) o f .7 1f; C PrO k. 10 VOSt 0, !tie.. Winchester... Windsor 3155 2958