The Sun. — London, England, 1830-07-10 00:00:00

The more that revenue questions are sifted in Parliament, the better must they be understood,and the more solid must be the prospect created of an improved administration of the finances. Lord Goderich, on Thursday evening, seemed to object to the mode of relief from taxation which had been adopted by Ministers, and--what is more strange — to the amount of it. His Lordship thought that it would have been better to (Vase the relief over many articles, titan to confine it to the single one of beer ; but we differ with Lord Goderich, and for this reason—that by repealing a single tax, we get rid likewise of the machinery for collecting it, end thereby make a twofold saving; whereas, on the other principle, the proportion of charge for collet lion, &c. increases as the net amount of tax dim'- nishes; sod it is evidenced by the fact that since the war the expenee of collection has not been reduced an equal tation with the taxation.'he second objpetion of Lord Goderich goes to the quantum of revenue sacrificed by the repeal of taxes now in pro gress, which he inclines to think more extensive than would - he consistent with the reservation of a due amount of annual surplus for the sinking fund. The Duke of Wellington met this objection fairly. He said that if the revenue should remain nt any thing like the level of 1829, there would be a very con siderable surplus ; that if the taxes had been dimi nished, as was stated by the Noble Viscount, 3,500,0001. a year, retrenchments to an equal amount had also been effected, viz., on the Navy, Army, anti Ordanee, 2,500,0006.; in the interest of the debt, 308,000/.; besides the saving produced by the reduction of the Four per Cents. of upwards of 700,0001, per annum. We agree with the Noble Duke in trusting that the relief produced by this of the Duke of Northumberland, of Earl Grosvenor, of Mr. Coke of Norfolk, and several other irdivi duals, that the Government of this country should be conducted according to the strictest principles of economy, because they can hardly gain as much from the public purse as is taken from them by ex- cessive taxation ; hut it is not so obviously the in terest of a Peer, possessed, perhaps, of only a few hundred pounds a year after paying the interest on his mortgages, to vote in favour of economy, his subsistence being chick , tletived from the produce of the taxes, We know, then, that as long es hu man nature is human nature, the generality of men will seek to promote their separate interest at the expense of the public, and that if the means exist the result will correspond with them. In the '4 Yrnes of June 14th there is a very sensible article on the circumstances which enable the electors of France to give an independent vote. " This lead us to mention (says our contemporary), that in the French elections balloting alone is used, and the lovers of liberty in that country are extremely jealous or apprehensive of a change.— If our readers have attended to the remarks which we have repeatedly made in this journal on the centralization of power in France, and the extent to which every man's interests are exposed in con tests with the local authorities—all removable at the pleasure of the Crown, and, consequently, all poli tical agents at a General Eleetion—they would per ceive that without a ballot in that country there could be no electoral independence. In all the in shuctions given to the electors by their constitu tionnl friends, either in the Journals, or through the circulars of the directing Committees, the former are particularly requested to be careful, in writing their bulleties, to avoid the inspection of the Pre sident or Secretaries of the Electoral College." But if, without the ballot in that country, there could be ' no r 'meow' independence, what arc the circumstances in this country which warrant us in expecting elec toral independence without it ? Our electors are poorer and more dependent than the electors of France. In that country time qualification of an elector is the possession of a considerable inde pendence. In that country property is more equally divided than in this, so that while the elector is more independent in circumstances, the power to controul him is more feeble. Our cotemporary in the same excellent article gives the following ac count of the state of the suffrage in this country, the accuracy of which is only equalled by the sarcasm with which it is set off : SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. i , , great saving of expenditure will tend so far to in -1,:•I crease the consumption of articles still subject to ki taxation, as gradually to restore the surplus income ass: to its level of 3,000,0001. per annum, recommended r.) by the fourth report of the Finance Committee, A and realised within the years 1828, 1820, to the ,g average extent of only 2,100,0001. The Duke of ~4 Wellington promises further reductions of expence, rlfind the public will willingly give credit to one who hue already do ne so much to disburden them, that N. . what he deems it possible to execute he will not i-, 2 leave neuttempted. In pensions, superannuations, IA Army, Navy, Ordnance, rind " miscellaneous," we 1.. .1 believe that a great deal may be done, the Duke him il self aeknowledgitig that out of the 101 millions which : ' they cost the people of England yearly, there are but L\., 11 millions which can be considered inacees- PA sible. So, with regard to the colonies, there is ' ; au übyse of extravagance which must be probed and r:leleatised, or the country will instruct Parliament to pays a vote, condemning the colonial system as an , o a n teeable nuisance, The Civil List, we have often and emphatically denounced as established on . 1 a scale too gigantic for a limited monarchy ; and the enorinous sums of money spent, as well (if re. port speaks truth) as hoarded, by the late Sove reign, are proofs both of the mischief and the need lessuess or leaving so much to the irresponsible dis-1 t hi ilMosul of any English King. We hove less sus. 1 pinion of an unworthy use of riches being ma d e ,b y 1 his present Majesty than by most of his predeees . — Hors on the throne. King William may be termed , without offending him--a family man, in many per ' ' ticulara of his life and history. Ile may have, and, Ino doubt, will feel that he has, many claimants on his heart and purse ; and even should he adn:it such dailn# too freely, the public must have a fur diffe ts.,, rent impreasion of the motives under which Wi l lia m 7 , IV. bestows his bounty on those who naturally 64 shore among them his best affections, than if he had it, , .p squaodered the property of an industrious people on isthe crawinga of licentious mid insatiable rapacity. IN Nevertheleaa, William IV, ought, under one or \,,, more Acts of Parliament, to furnish a better prece. dent than any of Iris ancestors, and above all things s•il less exceptionable than the late Sovereign has left ,4 ( 2 , after him, of the regulations and restrictions by which .' the use of the public money should henceforth be controulled.---71mes. , It seems to be agreed on all bands , that the de " duration of Mr, flume on Wednesday night—that 1 the people of England have the power of returning a majority of independent Members of Parliament, 4,., and they have themselves alone to blame if they do t • tiknot--wits, to say the least of it, a very ilyudged one. Mr. Hume might as well have said, i every man were to live within his income, no person need ~- be afraid of imprisonnieut for debt. 'nem is no - doubt, diet if the people cif Englund choose to re. ~ turn u rnejosity of independent Members, they can ~. do so; but we know that the motives to exercise IN, the franchise corruptly are in many ;daces too pow ij e;fol to be resisted; that lo other places they dare .., not Crate conscientiously. It is well observed by a eontemprorary (the Globe)" that titers is an error in :'. Me, flume'e calculations. The right of suffrage is, in many caw, solliciently extended; but where the 1, ' right of suffrage it extensive enough, the districts .ire too small. All tile men who boil a pot in this li-, ; or diet borough vote at elections ; but the borough ~. in rpiestian is so small, that all the men who have a pot to boil amount to one hundred or twp bun ', dred persons. The fact that they are poor does .tot of necessity make diem incorruptible. In fact, 'iii is the real cause of a great part of the compd. Wily of Parhaments,thet the right of voting is in the Itand.r of knots of indigent persons ,of persons so low in forttine and intelligeece, that they look to ft e l x iu tta re o c e urr e e a n s i e v s, o( or a p n u e t l i e li c lg tio e n tie C iao occ asio n :it: l e i i k t e je ts j .' °:l i t y ir a t t i any e roan 4 1 : e v li e:: to o a lfe c r a 2 ll o (l l. i 'tll °la t : o tilte° : l°lt l lelY : l e e e olii r if'. of the twain for his Vote in nay ease, tins Offer, of e it: e Llr io, would t e % v v b ° , o l : a t rej e cted i t ' le r j a e r w c a l l :;: l , 4 :Cit it jU o i tt l f i tle i t i i r il l i g ltt l o ti r ‘ O r ° o ll:. Y p i e n D e u u r n s : ;l it were re tv e 1 1 1 ° a s°pirou tr.1av44014: of a Scotch county 801, eh:elate, and that the eon -1.; elituelite of the forty dependent Scotch Members (fog' Mr. Hume reduced the number of independent 1. to five) would consider Any candidate who told f y,- Clem, that if they elected him they need look t, P.: nO favours throng!) his influenc:e with the Ministry 1,1 ,1,5 u very impertinent fellow, The leventy o• s :' eighty freeholders for a Scotch county sell them . ~.,i yes to tne CarniiiintCB IA regillorly us the electnts of u pot-walloping borough. 'tribe difference be : tween the cases is, that the number of dealers in Scotland being smaller, they obtain each a larger r ,„ price, not paid in ready nioney,, but in shining pa -1 ,mirage with the Memb er . o u r co n t em p orary ( t h e . i Times) well observes, with reaping to this power of .•. rcturniug independent Membera:— " 'Tice counties Ate particularly described by Mr. Hume 'i 4st being in possession of this enviable power. But will the '.. , limb clentlemen affirm that Am English County Election. I.:: as at pe t , ,, ent conducted, is likely to earl in the return of T; the fittest foul most independent Afeml*r of parliament ? Let the Hon. nentlernan lark at the frightful ezpense of . en election context for oily, but especially for a Isrge county, and then say that a eourity is in general a less strict mo. . neludy than tke closest borough. If by the words ' most " independent,' the richea itolivido4 ht, meant, then ee , street with the position of Mr. heart', that a County Member will, in nine cues out of ten, he time richest per -,, ' , no, br Wittlier stone ono member of the riuheat family in • the c ounty f or w hi ch he i s delegated . llut i s a C ounty ; 14 i fsmi tcr , so tiecte4—narnely, through his faculty i (spend., tqr an immeotte sum of money, or rather through the ~. ,1110: i n. 0 re of Lis knot . f relatives utol frienth.--the MN O/1w 14 tur turn? magnitud e ttf die alliance A 4 which he Wel bill It , Vy e 411, far froyn thinki ' 4 gcnersty. s/s do not a ll ; .1 434 "I. . "h a member i' inta, w e,,,„ womur t i e, e:eray.--but ..he of A , limo, ho navd "t 3', 1 eles . te, prejudices, and instrue or le will ho abauthitted by them. /^ 4, ' n o fi et is, dirt th,fr's ere kwa ear to that the rentAilta nintyr the fink • contend with ' and ,:, otde. The c„riatitueney ix twil'intrirm are "". too large for the pukka* tif any h u t 4 t i 1i ', 4 ?„2: 1 1 :", C „ e ,,' a , i n t d deter. Mould the conini(nener ) 10 a i 4.„ - , - 417; 1 7 : n "'", , i expeare would ho incurred by she te •IA '-` '' "" ' 4 h" Yet with I moth increase there hi no chant s of en inth,vadient ester.. er ' ice of the elective franchise." - I:, There cannot well be conceived a greater blew,. istettey than to speak of the power of returning in tit d m epei.ili , tit Members, with Out first making i t t h e , terext of O r.k w etor,i to return illilvio-4Olitht Mem. In I ,F. it is Ow hitt:test of the Marquis of StatTord The electoral system of our neighbours," he observes, though founded iu property, and in so far entitled to the approbation of certain British politicians, must be allowed to be deficient in those variegated forms and venerable uno mrt:ie., which, next to property, are the chief objects of admiration with such idolaters of our own highly-prized representative fabric. In the presence of such exclusive Statesmen, a Frenchman must confess with a sigh that France has not yet acquired the blessings of rotten boroughs and close corporations—that she has no scot-and-lot-paying freemen or forty-shilling freeholders—that she can boast of no pot-walloping burgesses or noble borough proprietors —that she does not see Deputies returned by universal suffrage, sitting by the side of the nominees of borough mongers—that she witnesses no jobbing in seats, and lies to Jew who can make a batch of Christian Legislators,— that she has no hustings' riots, no venal treating, no direct bribes, and no poll-book pet juries—that there is nut a Corte Castle nor an Old Sarum in the whole kingdom— that her Treasury has no snug stalls to confer on Under Secretaries or Lords of the Admiralty ; and that the Mem bers of the Upper Chamber, instead of remunerating a half or a third of the Deputies, as in a certain other country, cannot influence a single Electoral College.— There may be blemishes or beauties in the Constitution of our neighbours ; but whatever be their character, they cer tainly form a remarkable distinction between our system and theirs. Nor ought the latter to be treated with too great severity ; because, being yet in its teens, it hue not acquired the mature virtue of ages. Though a Constitu tion may work well,' and end well, with rotten boroughs and borough mongers, the most strenuous advocates for ancient abuses would scarcely propose to begin with them, or to snake them an element in a new system. The rust on the shield of Seriblerus may have constituted its chief value, when considered as' the venerable verdure of ages;' but the most frantic antiquary would never endeavour to ;lye value to a new shield by covering it with verdigris. ' The defects in our system of li,epresentatio►i are, no doubt, numerous, and for some of these defects no remedy short of an organical Reform can be effective. But it is possible, even with these de fects, so to improve the character of our Represen tative System as to render it equal to the protection of the nation. Wherever the electors are few we may expect them to be venal, if it be worth while to buy them. 13dt the ballot in most boroughs and in all the counties would be found as effectual a re medy against abuse here as in France. The absurd raving of those who talk of the possibility of Eng lishmen giving an independent vote without the pro. tection of the ballot is happily exposed in the able article on the ballot in the Westminster Review to which we alluded on Thursday last Among the opponents of the ballot in Pediment (observer the Reviewer) are some who cannot so much he said to arm, as to groan, and use inarticulate cries against it. Of this kind are those who say they hope that they shall nut live to witness the time when Englishmen shall not have the spirit to deliver their vote in the face of day. It would he as honest, and about as wise, to say they hope not to live to witness the time when every English• man shall not have his carriage and pair. If they were to say, which would bp the only thing to the purpose, that they hoped not to live to see the day when an Eng.. Millman would not go to the hustings, and fearlessly vote for the man of his choice, without regard to the dirt aim of any person upon earth, the falsehood of the pre text would bit top glaring to be successful, even an a country where as touch is done by hypocrisy es in Eng land. It is Matter of fact, notorious and undisputed, that a great majority of those who vote for Members of Par liament in England proceed to the hustings under the in. fluence of what they either hope to Jeceive, or dread to suffer, and prostitute themselves in the most infamous manner, by fi,ting not according to the dictates of their own minds, but like proucidng slaves st the will of an other. Are these the circumstances in whiph votes are com monly given in England, sod are men found Who say they hope nut to live to see the day when Englishmen will be afraid to vote openly ? Patience would be found to hear ahem in Ms aWIAIy, we think, upon earth, but one com posed of the very men who Robert; such votes. Courage to vote as EngUslitnen vote, at the commartd q those by whom they are bought or driven, is the courage of the slave, when he lends his body to the lash. Are these nun, who pregrad a horror at the prospect of parting with this, and receiving in tlchenge for it the protection of secrecy, because seem) , would degrade the people ? " A wish hr elevating the minds of the people is en _ . Indiabje w'sh, and the profession of it is truly a pretty profession; lost the true character of the profesaion iu known by the character of things which follow. Is the wish nut t • ere Englishmen vote secretly.. . 4 wi.h th at Englishmen slaadd have sufficient independence of mind to vote as they please, though all the world should know in what mu/01 they vote? We also entertain that wish moat fervent!y. We bars another strong wish, that all Englishmen were above being pa.tpers. We apprehend, however, it would little answer any good purpose for us to use the formula of those who level their wishes against the baliot, and say, they hope not to live to see the day when EneliOwn will live on charity. Poverty makes dos people of h.ngland willing to live on charity. De pendent eircumst meea make them willing to prostitute their votes. Your choice Ik. between prostitute voting and secret voting. There is the deepest degradation in prostitute voting. Not only is there no degradation in secret voting, ;nit it saves from all the degradation inse parable from prostitute Noting ; all men, therefore, who ihtprecate the degradation of the peeple— z not with hypocrisy, but i n a lenes t, are, of course, the silt/creates o!' the ballot." The writer Justides the morality of concealing the vote by a variety of eases. If ho had had the benefit of hearing Lord Wynford in the House of Lords, on Thursday lust, he would have learnt that forging papers OP; a view of smuggling when the object is to deceive itn cn,arpy, is reconcileable with the purest Christianity, bee time, Isis Via / l ordship argued, it is uconcileable with law, and Christianity is priwipiton, vapid, el finis of the law of England, It., that whcle)er is law is Christianity, and what ever is Christianity is law. We shall, in our next, endeavour to show that in the present circumstances of the country it is for the interest of the aristocracy th 4 t the roptesentation I'l be ;mproved —2lfurn , • WU. nig Larollici,2, It with lasrc Ir o e il se t t li tr e a pailiamentery rey"to that , reeding of the Libel Law ir rjEirMITS I MINSWEINtratte2VSP.vi. " Amendment Bill, Mr. Hume alluded to the case of Mr. Alexander, who is now suffering in prisoo the penalties of ex-ogicio law, for the freedom of his strictures on our present " liberal" AdMinistration. Mr. Hume asked the Attorney-General whether, as his Majesty bad extended his clemency to certain in dividuals under sentence of death, it was likely that die same course would be adopted with respect to that unfortunate individual ? The Attorney-General said he bad not hing to do with the subject, but his opi nion remained unchanged as to the propriety of the course that had been followed.. We presume that is a course opposite to what mercy would dictate, or we should have been distinctly informed of it before. We believe there were some bad cases among• those to which the noblest prerogative of the Crown has been graciously extended : but in some quarters, it is easier to forgive moral than political offences. Mr. Hutne stated that some of the parties were found guilty of murder; of that we are not aware, and think, on this point, he was misinformed. We do recollect indeed that one of the convicts'had been sentenced to die for forgery ; but we apprehend that the recorded decision of the House of Com mons against the propriety of inflicting death for this crime, will prevent the capita) punishment from ever again being carried into execution It is cer tain, however, that u number of feloni who had been doomed to terminate their career upon the scaffold, have by the Royal favour been saved from the exterminating sentence of the law. We still hope that the King, who has so auspiciously com menced his reign by consecrating its first moments to mercy, will not deny to a political offence —and that too an offence committed in an excess of zeal for the principles that placed his family on the Throne—the benevolent consideration which he has vouchsafed to crimes of malignant guilt and moral turpitude. It is better that the King should gratify the feelings of his people, than deserve the appro bation of his Home Secretary or Attorney-General. The blessings that clemency draws after it, will live to shed lustre on his memory, when the perishable splendours of this life shall have passed away. We leave the subject, riot doubting that his Majesty will indulge his own magnanimity of disposi tion, uninfluenced by the little feelings of others, and take the case of Mr. Alexander into his humane consideration. With respect to the Law of Libel Amendment Bill, it will be recol lected that it originally contained a clause im posing an additional security of 1004 on the con ductors of newspapers—and that Lord Morpeth had succeeded in a motion that the fresh recognizance's should be done away with. The Attorney-General, too tenacious of his purpose of shackling the Press to be thus baffled, proposed an amendment last night, on the third reading of the Bill, to restore the clause which the House had previously rejected. Lord Morpeth observed that the Learned Gentle man moved his amendment without any .explana tion, and with a brevity which, though, no doubt, extremely convenient to himself, yet was not de corous towards the House. Upon which Lord Normanhy rose, and observed that " the mariner in. which the Attorney-General had introduced his amendment resembled what had been said of his whole conduct since he had been in office."— " Front all that I have seen," said his Lordship, " the Hon. and. Learned Gentleman should be the last person to whom I would be willing to trust any additional power of oppressing the Press;" rind added, " I think it advisable to state this, because my self and my friends throughout the country share much unpopularity on account of the Whig Attor ney-General." Such observations had too much of unpleasant truth not to excite the sensitive temper of the Attorn e y -G enera l, w h o, w i t h considerable as perity of manner, said that, " whatever was the Noble Lord's opinion of his proceedings, he bad him• self no reason to reiract what he bud done, or to repent of it." In this opinion we believe the At torney-General has nearly the credit of singularity, A discussion followed upon the amendment, in which the Hon. and Learned Gentleman's notions of the " legitimate freedom," or, in other words, the mini sterial coercion, of the Press, were rather roughly handled by Lord Howick, Mr. Warburton Mr. P. Thomson, and other Hon. M e mb er s. dr. Hob- house observed that this Bill way " another manacle on the liberty of the Press." Numbers, however, prevailed against argument—the coercive amend meta was carried by a majority of 68 to 47, and thus the Attorney-General is consoled by his td umph in Parliament, for the unenviable reputation winch his ayste►natic crusade against the Press has obtained for him throughout the country.—Morn ing Herald. It is much to be regretted that public men either do not, or cannot, understand the value of popular favour, and at bow cheap a rate " golden opinions " are to be purchased. This is strongly illustrated in the case of his Majesty King William, who, in the few days which have elapsed since his accession, has done more by voluntary acts to oblige and great) the people than the country received from the Mi nisters of the late King during the whole time they have been in office. When some officious agent of the milltsry police, on the day of his Nesty's ac cession, forcibly expelled the crowd of gazers who had thronged the court-yard of the Palace, the King, on turning to the window, and viewing th e vacant space, asked what had become of the people, and on being told that they had been turned out, gave orders for their immediate readmission, accom panied, it is fluid, by a good-humoured but firm re buke of those who, ut the outset of his reign, had taken this mistaken road to Royal favour. Of the same description is the kind end considerate act to which we have already adverted—the opening of the long-desired passage by Waterloo-place to the Park; and we entertain no doubt but the disposition thus evinced will not stop here, but that th e King will find numberless other wa)s of gratifying at once the kindly feenga of his own heart, and !filing fresh claims upon the love and loyalty of his subjects. And where would be the harm, may wp not ask, if Ministers were to copy a little of this suavity from the King ? It is true that in private life we often witness a degree of insolence and huuteur in the servants which the master is a stran ger to. The gentleman's gentleman is proverbially very often the greater man of the two. But we should be sorry to class Ministers of State, though servants of the Crown, upon so degrading a emu. parison as this; and, if they shrink from the simili tude, let it teach them not to create it, new many note of greet, might the people hav e rece i ve d at their hands, and bow many substantial benefits Might have been poured upon their heads, had they been influenced by simihr feelings to those which i; is clear are pre-eminent in the breast of their Royal Master. With them dignified moroseness and an utter disregard of pop u l ar f ee li ng, take the place of those winning acts o f sympathy and generosity, which, while they endear men to each other, often literally Cost little more than the inclination to con. fur them We trust, then, that the example of his Majesty will not be lest upon his Ministers; that they will see what it is to be the servants of a popular King ; and that th ey will not disdain to learn this useful lesson from so high a quarter, how . it much easier is to govern by kindness th an coer . ciote-sqlfornfn& /fervid, Mr. liouNE, of the Chancery Bar, has been appointed Attorney-General, and Mr. J. WilLiamus, Solicitor-General to her 141a2ricrY. THE BEER BILL.---We understand that our Right Hon. Representative has succeeded in procurinv an important clause to be inserted in the new Sale of Beer all. Under the present law, tkotilLs • me are not hound to supply their liquor in vessels of the full standard measure, unless especially required to do so by the purchaser; but by Mr. Iluatussos's amendment, they will in f u t ur e b e liable to a penalty if they do not deliver it to their customer► in trotscls lazed according to the standard. Thi, will Rup i)p, th e deficiency so often notic e d, part i cularly in the ,‘ Oat, of a l e ," which should contain a half pint, but has hitherte generally fallen short of lawful measure. --Liverpool Cour. COURT OF REQUESTS.--Gumbium. 112111T11 V. SAMPAMUNDUS. This was a case against a German Jew, for wages alleged to be due to the daughter of the plaintiff, to the amount of thirty-six shillings. The plaintiff stated that his daughter had been bound for two years to the Jew, who was a .clob betel., or converter of old clothes into new, in which trade he was said to be a nine days' wonder to his customers. lie had nearly finished his tuition of the girl, when she received an injury which crippled her arm for some time in such a manner that she could neither fine-draw nor tieken up a nap on the weather-beaten "toggery" which the old clothes men, by whom the clobberer was employed, pur chased in their daily travels. As soon as she reco vered, however,.she went back to serve out the re mainder of her time, amounting to about nine or ten weeks, but her services were rejected, and the Jew refused to: pay her the - sum due to her, which, being calculated at four shillings a week, reached the demand mentioned in the summons. The clobberer said he was an honest man, and he taught the girl his trade well, so that she could mis lead the sharpest eye ; it didn't signify how thread bare a coat or breeches was, she was quite at home in them.—(LauAhter.) The COMMISSIONER desired Mr. Sampamundus to come to the point, without revealing the secrets of his trade. The clobberer again declared that he was an honest man; but he denied that character to the plaintiff,or to the young woman herself.—(A laugh.) --It WM a conspiracy against him. lie had engaged the girl, and was to teach her the trade of making old " good for nothing goods" perfectly new and serviceable, and she had, upon receiving the hurt, left him, but instead of returning when she was reco vered to finish her time, she engaged in another ser vice because she was offered 2s. a week more. Upon the part of the plaintiff this atatement wits denied ; but upon the examination of witnesses it was found that the Jew was in the right, and, of course, the summons was dismissed. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. BOW-STREET. Yesterday William Child was charged before Mr, llinistuni. with having embezzled various sums of money, the property of his muster, Colonel Wynd. hum, of the 10th Hussars. Colonel Wyndham stated that the prisoner lived in his service as cook, in which capacity it was part of his duty to pay the tradesmen's bills. Madame de la Beebe, the Colonel's housekeeper, stated that she gave various sums to the prisoner to discharge the bills of tradesmen. On the 10th of January last she gave him 331. 10s. for that purpose, and on the 27th of February she gave the prisoner a further sum of 114/. The prisoner said that he had discharged several bills with this money, the payment of which he entered in the book now produced. Upon inquiry, however, it appeared that several bills entered as paid were left unsettled. Amongst these was a bill of 5/. furnished to the Colonel by Messrs. Jupp and Sons, coal-merchants. Mr. MINSUULL said he should proceed upon this case, which appeared sufficiently strong to warrant him in committing the prisoner for further exami nation. The prisoner, in his defence, admitted that he had embezzled the money ; but threw himself for for giveness upon the clemency of the Colonel, urg;ng in extenuation of his guilt that it was his first offence.—He was remanded. OLD BAILEY, JULY 9. David Richardson, aged 18, was indicted for steal ing a gold watch, value 301., in the dwelling-house of William Giesler. The prisoner put in a written defence totally (lo nying the robbery. Mr. Baron GARROW described this defence as one of those foolish productions drawn up by a set of fellows who were constantly to be seen lurking about prisons, and who generally contrived to do more harm than good to the unfortunate persons whom they professed to serve. The Jury found the prisoner Guilty, but recom mended him to mercy, on account of his youth. Mr. Buren G4UROW felt great pleasure in telling the Jury, that from what he bad recently observed, their recommendation would meet with every atten tion in the proper quarter. The Royal mercy was unbounded, and would in future be exercised in every case that called for its interposition. The emphatic manner of the Learned Baron in uttering the above remark, produced an evident feel. ing of gratification in the Court. The prisoner was then removed. At five o'clock the notorious hey Solomon: was again placed at the bar, charged upon the third in- thetment with having broken and entered the dwel ling-house of Thomas Neul, in the city of London, and stealing 23} yards of cloth, value 101., his pro per_ty. Len, the officer of Lambeth-street, rated to the Court, that the prosecutor in this case had died since the commission of the robbery, and that Mary Gil lings, a material witness for the prosecution, could not be found. The RECORDER said, that under those circutn stances the indictment could not be sustained, and the Jury were therefore bound to acquit the prisoner. The Jury then pronounced a verdict of acquittal. FOURTH INDICTMENT. The prisoner was again indicted, for a burglary in the dwelling-house of John Baker, and stealing► ►herein a quantity of silk shawls and other articles, value 2001., the property of E. Woodward and Co. Mr. Edward Woodward called—Part of the shawls now produced I can positively swear to, as part of the property stolen from our premise,. The rest I cannot identify. Cross-examined by Mr. C. Putwys---It was ten months after the robbery that the goods were found in the prisoner'S possession. Mr. Clark examined—l was a turnkey of New gate in the year 1827, when the prisoner, Isaac Solomona, was a prisoner in that gaol. He eeeaped from custody in that year. Mr. C. Pintnya submitted that no ease was made out for the Jury. No evidence of a burglary had been adduced, and what man could account for property which came into his possession ten month• after it was alleged to have been stole!, ? Mr. CLARKSON followed on the same side, and urged on the part of the prisoner the gross injustice of charging him with the capital crime of burglary upon such slender evidence. The ItEconinat was of opinion that the ease 'gilt to go to the Jury, and was about to sum up le evidence, when— The Jury said they would save his Lordship the rouble, as they had made up their minds to acquit .he prisoner. --A verdict to that effect was accord. ugly returned. PIM! INDICTMENT. The prisoner was main placed upon his. trial for a burglary in the dwelling•house of John Dewis, in the city of London, and stealing goods, value 4791., the property of John Wray. John Graham, a warehouseman, in the service of the prosecutor, who is a silkmercer, in Wood -strew, Cheapside, stated that on the night of the 20th of July, 1826, he left the premises secure, and on hie return to them next morning he found that the ware house lied been broken open, and that three part• of the property had been stolen. The prisoner was not a customer of the prosecutors, and witness never saw hits until yesterday. Cross-examined by Mr. C. months bad elapsed between the robbery and the finding of the goods at the lodgings of the prisoner. Robert Hardy, a hosier in Maiden-lune, proved that he saw part of the stolen property ut Lambeth street poliee-ellice after the prisoner was apprehended. Other evidence having been produced, The Ruconum was about to sum up the dome when Mr. C. PHILLIPS rose, and again contended that there was no evidence whatever to convict the pri soner of the charge laid in the indictment, it having been laid down by Mr. Justice James Park, that a person was nbt called upon to account for the pos session of goods found in his custody three months after they had been stolen. Mr. CLititttsoN quoted the words of the Learned Judge to whom reference had been made, and said that the dictum of his Lordship was bottomed in good sense and justice. The RECORDER said, that lie was bound to send the case to the Jury, who were best capable of judging how far the facts deposed to affected the prisoner. The Jury without the least hesitation returned a verdict of Not Guilty. The prisoner was then removed from the bar.— He has now been tried on all the capital charges, and acquitted. The remaining three indictments are for feloniously receiving goods knowing them to have been stolen. These indictments will be proceeded with to-morrow (this day), and five other indict ments of a similar nature have been found against the prisoner, but it is said they are to stand over until next sessions. FROM THE GAZETTE OF LAST NIGHT, Whitehall, July 7, 1830. The King has been pleased to present the Rev. R. Wallace to the old church and parish of St. Michael's, at Dumfries, in the Ps esbytery and County of Dumfries, void by the death of Doctor Alexander Sgot. War Office, July 9. 13th Regiment of Light Dragoons--J. L.grew, Gent., to be Veterinary Surgeon, ♦ice Schroeder, appointed to the 7th Dragoon Guards, dated July 9, 1830. 15th Regiment of Foot—Assistant•Surgeon IL Cald well, from the half-pay of the 31st Foot, to he Assistant- Surg•on, vice C. Collis, who exchanges, July 9. 24th Foot—Lieut. J. Harris to he Captain, without purchase, vice Monckton, deceased, May 11. Ensign W. G. Brown to be Lieutenant, without pur chase, vice Harris, May 11. Gentleman Cadet IL Farrant, from the Royal Military College, to be Ensign, without purchase, vice Brown, July 9. 33d Foot—Cornet F. Stanford, from the half-pay or the 12th Light Dragoons, to be Ensign, without pot.- chase, vice Tully, who resigns, July 9. 36th Foot—Captain H. Mitchell, from the half-pay of the 96th Foot, to be Captain, vice F. J. St. Quintin, who exchanges, July 9._ 38th Foot—Lieut. W. F. Vernon to be Paymaster, vice arant, deceased, July tie 41st Foot—H. Greville, Gent, to be Ensign, without purchase, vice ICirkbride, whose appointment has not takenplace, July 9. bad Foot—Capt. J. Q. Pardey, from the half-pay of the Royal Staff Corps, to be Captain, vice E. 13. Philipps, who exchanges, July 9. 61st Foot—Ensign 11. Gloster to be Lieutenant, with out purchase, vice Burelem, deceased, Feb. 18. Gentleman Cadet 11. Aldridge, from the Royal Military allege, to be Ensign, vice Gloster, July 9. 6td Foot—Captain C. F. Neynoe, from the half-pay, to be C.ptain, vice J. H. Anstruther, who exchanges, July 9. UNATTACIIID. To be Majors of Infantry, without purchase. ]3ievet Lieut.-Col. W. Cochrane, Inspecting Field Officer of Militia, in Nova Scotia, July 9. Brevet Lieut.-Col. D. M'Dougall, Inspecting Field Officer of Militia in Nova Scotia, July 9. Brevet Lieut... Col. J. F. Love, Inspecting Field °diet'. of Militia in New Brunswick, July 9. paraiso 18th February, and sailed fot • May. The Conflict from Plymouth, " 91 from Falmouth, arrived at Madeira 1 3 th former sailed on the 15th for Africa, on the 14th for Rio Janeiro. The Mt, at Nassau from Jamaica 234 April, an d May for Honduras. The Winchester Nassau from llavannah 27th April, = May for Bermuda. The Hyacinth ar!l' sau from Falmouth 23d M a y, and 11 01 ' Carthagena. EXILE OF ERIN. A new discovery settles the question authorship of the. Exile of Erin, n‘ writer in the Sligo Observer, It seem' been found, dated 1783, and in this i belonged to George Nugent Reynold , . seen " the contested Exile; " therefore i' written by that g e ntl e m an l if t ooth( longing to another gentleman, were 1773, and if " the contested Exile" VI, therein, we suppo se we wou ld be clai' lieve that he was th e author, and that li. from the pen neither of Reynold , " r i s We would ask Intlwha there was to re ve l' .0 man from writing BO9, or subsequentiosliii has all the marks of old age," and dated 1783. We are told that " ti t h t greatly faded." Time for it in thirty, O pt) of " foriy•seven years." F i f teen or cel lo will make a great di ff erence in the &Pil e ink and paper used in modern dor' lel to have in our possession what purport! draft of Mr. Reynolds' famous letter to l'r l i It is written on a mutilated sheet of Pur r ' 0 1 0 taken from an attorney's office. There 1 ,1 ' 40 0 of the sheet a portion of the form of 0 / 1 ° . i , 1 1 and the date is September, 1796. Ti"!, 0 0 years later than the date of the book, 0 ' u 0 r less the paper and ink, we can 0 ,0 )4 friend, have as much the appearance ° 6ll as if they were a century old. Th ° d th3t to book proves nothing, or, if it does, it t 0 j to make rather against the theory of the than for it, as it suggests to one to o'k ": t l iO was in the circumstances of 1783 to Im, / fo ol gentleman's . head to weep over the In:: vi i 4 an Irish exile? The tim es immedint9ble 1800 furnished many an or i g i n al for ' ls 11 drawn in the disputed verses, but Pa of such images of p o li t i ca l m i s f or tune I ° llo l imagination in 1783. • We heard late l li; a t IA of the family of N e d L ysag h t supposed, !,,..iiiit° the composer of"th econteste dExile;' r a ' . o o aurae, because he was known to court the Ins brilliant success, and had a relative "')'h at sported not i n 1783 , b ut 1799. Put w a tr ol is sought to b e esta bli s h e d b y this contr a :j A t ' these ver ses ? I s i t t h at Campbell c"r pill i them, and th a t R e y no ld s c ou ld ? If sh it in view, ti me and ingenuity are direete", '"," in which th ose w h o can apprec i a te 1 ° 6 , 1 , 0 0 either p ar ty can ta k e li tt l e Inter est. ' O O spirited in its way as is the Exile , $ 0 .;! gifted than either might be its c OO V. l ' l e, Imagine that Campbell after all he hil l u ° ,:oo capable of doing, would be guilty ( 4 ° l '', se! of adva nc i ng now an un f oun d e d claim .- o e, Lion so much within an every day 1 , le hisjertil e an d e l oquent pen , see ms ht l " preposterous.—Dublin Morning Roulet* 4 _-...i TH . eh , On the '7th inst. at BI San ß dgate S , Kent, ..• Du Boulay, Esq. of a daughter. , if On the Bth i ns t. a t F u lh am , t h e lady o f t '' Nelson, of a daughter. t P. O n n ic t k h i e na t, E i4 . t. , ( a; Tottenh am - green , 111 On the Oth inst. in Stratton- stree t, the Rowles, Esq.,_ of a son. ' On the bth inst. at Awb r idge•houget - - ' llls of T. Sergeant, El. of a sop. N O° On the 7th inst. at Woodford, MI. ' daughter. su O .a n nu t u b l e i MARRIED. 00 Woodward, Eg.o f B • . Flee' A. 1. , luverte-streek, ro om same place. Pratten, Bthinst eldest daughter dDauugo:ttaerniusfit3st trl.te,,- oto too On the Bth inst. at Salisbury William , l' f j •t o u b r n t It L t i l ' a r u d ih E te l r . ' o o f f the K u l l a l ie f() R rd t : Y. G N i l lu n e n trir:l'll:4 of Little Ctieverell, Demize4. lief On the Bth inst. at Stapleton, re ter ' 331 0 11 17: "i, of Henley-upon. Thames, to Cat Ate,. ° ~. te r of Thomas Rumford, Eq. 0 t f Stap'clen , 14 of Gloucester. DIED. f On the Bth in s t. A nne , the beloved W ife 0 of Kenniugten-e -unman. Ib On the sth i nst . a t G o ilmancliester, AO' Capt. Al , llineux, R.N. sBh year.O t nthee7th mat. Mr. Isaacs Earlyaman S ' r ar i r On the 7th inst. at Swamea, Mrs. P. after an illness of eleven pm.% PAINTZD AND PUNLINVIND :BY MUI .• ‘, " ...' _ . _ ~,-.•.,-,::f „ . ~, . •:.4;..v.-% . , it having isavpriing- back-maker--H. k t ..m str ak ee e t r , Southwark, _ n.Roihiso rnereb n, Bir a m itt— e ingh ß am . 11 , 3,gikitil,o ar tn k hie , o ii to t h a s t ; --W' Moon, Sea t, s v ii in o g red ton it , c r s tnersa litatio tali ne iri r— l i Pt loit,.. Learned bcoriydegnet.Wertiellse,nKmenat,usgrs-moceercer—Jr...:BJe.cuksooyn: j J a; and said G. H. Triinhey, Watlitag.street, merchant. omed in fee - house , cagen, ani df o o f rd- G pl e a o ce r7-y co ar in d, me n r i c a i i i t i er ro ug o PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVE ~ Ito send W. Lure and W. P. Thomas,' Pontypeello brewers—W. Davis and G. Paull, leath er 4 r tpuble of Gib son and J. Eggleston , N ewcas tl e -upon-TO ..-.. cted the B. and J. Kirkham, Oldham, Lanesrh irr; et spinners—J. Meyer and T. Haywar d, 13 , turned a general-importers—O. Ormrod, T. Taylor, 0 1 :,,, Bolton-le-Moors, Lancashire, cotton- man ufg , e bar, Robinson, G. Field, and H. Hanbury, Laeilet -*,. reer , o7or d W. Leedham and J. Waller, High-street , 64 t g 4 are ch to have ro ;ese , s iton G g e e o ra rge — , C. Ha H n a o r v w e o r. od sp a la n r d e, Ci a . ue l t i i , o i n 7 r , and J. Green, Birmingham, coal-dealers —IL ~,`: rocsded S. Pinn, and R. Shea, Great Pulteuerstree t i w ' ict- I against PRICE OF SUOMI. i in i tl ollT over . The average price of Brown or 31118C0Y11,10 SI/0 puted from the R e turns made in the week eetl i se is 235. lOd. per ewt., exclusive of the dutinotr, ..............................r h : Tiehes,leviv,,oßa id R. paid Grea payableotrßritin. lt thereon on the importatio n the li NATAL INTELLIGENT& I . PLYMOUTH, JULY B.—The rifle hired packet, Lieut. Scott, arrived from r i 7 on Thursday, to be repaired. The Bramble cutter, Lieut. Haswell, ta li ," o v , G ent. , westward late on 'Wednesday s evening : th t :. Anted to to the Sound on Monday morning, and og i ceeded to Falmouth on Tuesday. .. 1 ,0 11. Call- The Antelope cutter, Lient. ° Capel,7,,,u knistant- Talavera, arrived from the Downs Ott Tl i tit ( receive the men raised by the IndustrY,M,, without Blockade Service, and having taken out par- o t% l s i . e s en un 2 d o ay an in d o 3 n O lin v g o . lunteers, she left tliiir :IlAw: i iipa i mthl i tywoauoryrtf daopinuai d.filTTT(t:lrhthrhyohoeleeirient Vigilant aA F edi Bmni Monday Arrow dyrtro a r oioe t ta e rwozor, , martred 4 rein t ukto , tae:trtey: C cro.h a o: p nL ta ise i nil Saturday. u. .T r . Td C al iy: o ..a g e lli k 51:1,, c :I Brown, 0 1 if-p a y o r from Portsmouth on ' Sunday morning, wa yi nut par- m for on th d e ay D r o o c r k- p y o a r r t d s , m an ou d th sai . led (to return to 1 ._____. , The Royalist, Britomart, Princess Elizabeth r . , 10 has not e— Me C te 4 o le r, d° and ill' C K ar e ro n n t, s n tea rYol ' 44 .7. li : If-pay of In Barupool—Undaunted. Clio, 18 , went do ca L w m i n e e u to t : n t t h rt o : l S l L o g : n un o edis o : 1" • Philipps, At the Island—Amphitrite transport. - , In the Sound—Clio. iii ,t, with- His Majesty's steamer Messenger, an ' Cadiz from Falmouth, 15th J une . Nosh Mil ship Ariadne, sailed from Gambi a fig Si‘..„c"- ,1 , 0 t 20th April. The Volage arrived lit IT"iii (: h P I Y' from Rio and Bhhia, 24th April, nod s-l or t c /In g e '' , a cruise. The Thetis arrived at .I.)'/'„, a ii paraiso 18th February, and sailed fott tl . , ll- 6 1 4 I; May. The Conflict from Plymouth, " 9 " ' , J on g Field from Falmouth, arrived at Madeira 1 313 At h [ former sailed on the 15th for AfricJ , n '"„; g Field on the 14th for Rio Janeiro. The Aler i, Ni at Nassau from Jamaica 23d April, ali" s ";;ig I utile( r May for Honduras. The Winch est er s o Nassau from llavannah 27th April, '''' d ,:i,l, 4 May for Bermuda. The Hyacinth orra r ,, 0 'minis- mu from Falmouth 23d May, and foil ed .1 not tlie Carthugena. ~.: . '‘ EXILE OF ERIN. .., et, Old Ctoouratuor-t. aut hor shipbbwee reiAjont belonged writer oe e iud w nnditi,ol oe dated Ga Sligotte discovery ehoderg.lE7 l B e xN 3 t i tltliege and fni Observer,dtt the question'' Erin, te g yts u hen e ieos s ai: l c: i 1 ibc oi :or d: o! , „, ~ deem the written i l b i d a yi co ft h, : a it tt e h s ge t e e cn d ot 11 E 1e:e x: a l: fel d c - E t xi n ifi e e r a : n r: o; r : e rei ; : ; l;,lol ‘o oll :,.. b. 4 at o ne ,. Anurall , - longing to another gentleman, ware fO u r .,4 '': n- J tilv .. , biIMORANDOU. The date of Assistant-Surgeon F. Goodwin's Commis sion, in the '7sth Foot, is 12th May, 1830, and net the 15th June, Ib3o, as formerly stated. DECLARATIONS OF INSOLVENCY. John Lawson }layman, Sion-place, East-street, Old Kent-road, corn-dealer. Thomas Berry Christian, Leicester, salt-dealer. BANKRUPT& Richard Gorham, Woolwich, tallow-chandler, to sur render July 16, SO, and Aug. 20, at two, at the Court of Commissioners. Nukes and Colquhoun, Woolwich, Henry James Pettit, Hastings, Jeweller, July 23, at one, 27, and Aug. 20, at twelve, at the Court of Commis sioners. Butt, Lancaster-place, Waterloo-bridge. David Voss, Upper Thames-street, lighterman, July 23, 27, at eleven, and Aug. 20, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Kirkinan and Rutherford, Cannon-street. John Shawcrosa, Darcey-Lever,l3olton-le-Moors, coun terpane-manufacturer, Aug. 2,4, and 20, at one, at the Star Inn, Manchester. Appleby and Charnock, Ray mund-buildings, Gray's-Inn ; Grundy, Bury, Lancashire. Edward Thomas Bridgen Carter, Cardiff, Glamorgan shire, common-brewer, July 22, 23, and Aug. 20, at one, at the Bush Tavern, Bristol. White, Lincoln's-lun buildings ; Short, Bristol. James Bacon, Tonbridge-plaoe, New-road, maslin. embroiderer, July 13, at nine, 16, at eleven, and Aug. 20, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Parker, South-square, Gray's-inn. Ann Walker, Wolvethampton, Staffords%ire, dealer, Aug. 6, at six, at the house of Mr. James Mitchell, Whiston-cross, Shropshire, 7, and 20, at the Star Ina, Shitfnall. Coster, Wolverhampton; Lowes, Tanfield court, Temple. William Tabberer, Great Wigaton, Leicestershire, timber-merchant, July 21, at air, 22, and August 20, at ten, at the Lion and Dolphin Inn, Leicester. Fisher, Ashby-de-la-Zouck ; Austen and Hobson, Raymond buildings, Gray's Inn. John Wheeler, King's Arms-yard, Coleman -street, wine merchant, July 20, at half-past two, 23, and August 20, at two, at the Court of Commissioners. Evans, Gray's Inn-square. Peter Valentine, Bury, Lancashire, hardwareman, Au. gust 2,4, and 20, at two, at the Star Inn, Illinchester. Chilton and Son, Lincoln's Inn; Hutton, Bolton, Lan cashire. Evan Thomas, Liverpool, house-builder, July 23, 24, an d August 20, at one, at the Clarendon-rooms, Liverpool. Whitley, Liverpool; Adlington, Gregory, and Faulkner, Bedford-row. Robert Wilton Ronald and William Browne, Liverpool merchants, July 23, 24, and Aug. 20, at two, at the Golden Lion Inn, Liverpool. Lowe, Tanbeld•court, Temple; Leigh and Sanders, and Radcliffe and Duncan, Liverpool. David Linsey, Liverpool, draper, July 23, 24, and August 20, at one, at the Clarendon-rooms, Liverpool. Norris, Allen, and Anthony, John-street, Bedford.row; Greenough, Wigan. DIVIDENDS. C. Perry, Drury-lane, victualler, July 80, at three, at the Court of Commincioners—T. Obee, Weymouth-street, Marylebone, carpenter, July SO, at twelve, at the Court of Commiasioners--E. B. Broughton, Sauthimpton-street, Covent-garden, tailor, July SO, at three, at the Court of Commissioners—R. Dote, Paddington, brick-maker, July 30, at ttio, at the Court of Commissioners: —G. Burgeon, Maidototte, miller, July SO, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners—J. H. Pemberton, St. John-atreet, West Smithfield, draper, July 31, at ten, at the Cmirt of Cmn mlssioners—l. Lees, Oldham, Lancashire, cotton-spinner, Aug. 6, at ten, at the York Hotel, Manchester—E. A. Spilabury, Walsall, Staffordshire, apothecary, Aug. 2, at eleven, at the George Inn, Bewdley, Woreettershire—S. Holland and T. S. Williams, Liverpool, merchants, July Sl, at two, at Lace and Sans' offices, Liverpool —J. Gar • ner, Woolston Mill, Warwickiliire, miller, July 31, at one, at the George Inn, Hinckley, Leicestershire—.W. Rhode's, Stockport. Cheshire, corn.dealer, July 31, at one. at the York lintel, Manchester —W. Wheeler, Chelten ham, whitesmith, Aug. 2, at four, at Shipton's Hotel, Cheltenham —.W. G. Tucker, Exeter, watchmaker, July 30, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners—H. M. Bird and B, Savage, Jeffries-square (in partnership with ft. Bird, New York, America), merchants, Aug. 18, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners---W. Llewellyn, Fenchurch street, and Hackney, merchant, July 30, at One, at the Court of Comutisaioners—E. Pike, Staines, blacksmith, July 20, at two, at the Court of Commissioners--.S. Oiler, Helstone, Cornwall, grocer, July 30, at ten, at tlx Court of Commissioners--G. Hassell, late of Hanover. street, Hanover.aquare, dealer, July 30, ut eleven, at the Court of Commissionere--IL Blakey and S. Blakey, Ossett, Yorkshire, cotton.apinners, Aug. 13, at eleven, at the Sessions-house, Waketield--11. Preston, Liverpoot, broker, July 31, at two. at the Clarendon-rooms, Liver pool—T. Dewhirst, Sheffield, grocer, July 31, at twelve : at the Tontine Inn, Sheffield.—W. Plume, Stock, Biil . rimy, E , sei, builder, July SO, at eleven, at the Court cl Commissioners—T. Fawcett, Basinghall-otrect, ware. houe.!man, July 30, at twelve, at the Court of Commis missioners—W. Abbott, Wiudhatn-place, merchant Aug. 6, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners...-W. Grant, Gosport, silversmith, Aug. 2, at twelve, at ti e Crown Ina, Gosport. - CERTIFICNITS—JuLY 90. T. Bowling, Gunthorpe, Lincolnshire. 11, Kent-street, Southwark, merchants—A. back-maker—H. Rollason, Birmingham! —W. Moon, Seavington, Setnersetshirit' Holywell-street, Shoreditch, stationer — bridge Wells, Kent, grocer—J. Jackson, - Covent-garden, man's-mercer--R. Lloyd, fee-house, and of George-yard, molter R. Gagen, Bedford-place, Commercial , G. H. Trimbey, WaUing•street, merchant, PARTNERSHIPS DISSOL W. Lure and W. P. Thomas, Pont. l brewers—W. Davis and G. Paul!, leather Gibson and J. Eggleston, Newcastle-upon -1 —B. and J. Kirkham, Oldham, spinners—J. Meyer and T. Horns', ' general-importers-0. Ormrod, T. Taylor; Bolton-le-Moors, Lancashire, cotton-mr Robinson, G. Field, and H. Hanbury, W. Leedham and J. Warter, High•r ch-esemongers—C. Harwood and G. Uri row, St. George, Hanover-square, sucti° and J. Green, Birmingham, cosl.dealer S. Pinn, and R. Shea, Great Pulteuer, PRICE OF SUGAR. The average price of Brown or puted from the Returns made in the %reek is 235.1 01 per cwt., exclusive of the paid or payable thereon un the importation Great Britain. NAVAL INTELLIGENJ PLYMOUTH, JULY B.—The Print, hired packet, Lieut. Scott, arrived frut, on Thursday, to be repaired. The Bramble cutter, Lieut. Haswell, westward late on Wednesday evenigg to the Sound on Monday morning, ' ceeded to Falmouth on Tuesday. The Antelope cutter, Lient..Capel, Talavera, arrived from the Downs ea receive the men raised by the Industry, Blockade Service, and having taken tween 20 and 30 volunteers, she left tl on Sunday morning. The Forte, 46, Captain J. Cog paid off into ordinary on Saturday. The Arrow cutter, Lieut. Thrscitl from Portsm o uth on Sunday morning, for the Dock-yard, and sailed (to return ti on Monday af ternoon . The Vigilant k etc h, Li eu t. B. Low Monday for Portsmouth. The Clio, 18, went down to the Soul and the Britomart, 10, came into liami In Hamoaze—Caledonia, Kent, Dry Royalist, Britomart, Princess Elizabeth dustry tender, Meteor, and Carron steal In Barupool—Undaunted. At the Island—Amphitrite transport. In the Sound—Clio. His Majesty's steamer Messenger, Cadiz from Falmouth, 15th June. ship Ariadne, sailed from Gambia for 20th April. The Volage arrived lit from Rio and Bahia, 24th April, and a cruise. The Thetis arrived at i