The Sun. — London, England, 1833-03-08 00:00:00

/. 7 .. y ' . ~ .. ./- 4 .. ,/,' - e -Y-- , : 5) lye measure3.--,f - nar.) Air thr (.-' ,- --t , ,,, k .; ' ... .4 ‘ _,. -, ? • ''' '' f AA' 4 : : 4.Z .. .1 .:1t e% ''' -• .t .. .(... ~• ii ' • '*. 1 '.) r 4.- /.. C • ^ ~. . . . ' i •'' ..4 :': .• ... St 1 •:., . 111 '': ' 'fir ‘,.. y/. o p. .. ..,-, -- . t M r '.." .... 'l°".. 'llllllll6 . 14 , '''. ' , _ ,a ' - - -- - o ,"' o' "':" . A.,\1.,• '_f; - /K H. , :t - ~., 2 , \ _ ,: \:\.,' '. - dt. :.: -.9:- ' ' ' -: _,, 2 :Sr ' , A9 \ t'a ...... . • -,,,,....•Z5% ' \ „„t, , ..... ',. '., + \ 1 1 - )", : 'l.• • .• - -: ~kt'', ; ' ','" f 9 ,;',A 4 ' '- • -.IP o ._ dk. ,1 A 0 ' : 7 ~/ 4 0 l t j •"" (.........-' • 1 0 I x_L , L ,, -' 0111; 1 .1r • 3 ' ' , •Plf ', " ; AI- 0 —-' , , .Iy7; for c 0.,. lie should take soother opppitunity of vindicating in county and city of Kil- Jeenny from the aspersions which bad been thrown upon it. In making the statement he had done be did not mean to include those disturbers of the public peace who committed outrages that every body must deprecate and deplore, and to whom the strong arm of the law ought to be applied. If the arm of the law was not sufficiently etrong to react, them, he would willingly lend Lis aid to his Majesty's Go' vernment to make such enactments as the urgency of ti c *sae required. An HoN. MEMBER felt called on to say that, so far front the county of Kilkenny being in a tranquil state, a brother-in-law of Lis (the Hon. Nlember) was unable to le tve home for the purpose of attending even a place of : w sal4:d o ieoid r onr s rte h sshs i aso p aii tagbrhiyie)ttthihfiateter Noble leering House, ring a number of armed men in his house to protect it.—(Hear.) d f ld. course of the debate Mr. GRATTAN said this representation was very different from the statement made by an Hon. Member, w on t t wa o et n l r h :d l e : , egafiae:rni: gentleman re b er .m d e;adfnri Grattan)on7, anotherilreland. height vj e , t o n a B : Member, that In the pbhat informed,eirardte that it was unsafe for Gentlemen to participa'e in the n and firmly believed, that at the very moment he was ing in the county of Ki kenny ; and he positively denied that it was the custom of those gentlemen to go out armed with pistols.—( Hear.) Mr. O'DWYER regretted that only one unpaid Magistrate in that county had been found to exer cise fully the duties of his office ; and that other magistrates had not followed his example in going about among the farmers and peasantry, and en deavouring to allay discontent by advice and assistance.— (Hear, hear.) He was convinced that if a, proper feeling was cultivated between the magistracy and the people, outrages would at least be lessened, and might be expected entirely to cease. The prayer of the petition he most heartily concurred' in, and gave it his host support. Mr. SULLTVAN admitted that tl-ere were outrages in the county of Kilkenny, but was convinced, atrocious as they were, that they might' be put down by an efficient magistracy.--( Hear.) i'esterd aY ' ) et dull; very vs', illds• and ot her a ica 495' i 5,30 T lo Wis lle't°llle ast Y ,e ar ' 76.1• 413 e b'g s ' so gi Th '" has o e pure . b ut tie va rleu rt ico. arket, pa ,nei , the 11° iii woul d and ex ceeu m olcet in the ed, ill cra sh n et , ' . Gr— arcleia,rket th hts fro ID V 011rable for t i o n to bill LONDON, FRIDAY EVENING, MARCH 8, 1833. (PRICE 7D.) (No. 12,(134.) His next petition was one of rather more importance. It was from the parish of Fairy-Beg, in the county of kenny—a part of the country which had been stated to be in such a monstrous state of di•turbance. The peti tioners stated that that part of the country was now perfectly tranquil, and had been so for some time. They stated also that an attempt had been made by some wickedly disposed persons to introduce the system of Whitefeet, but that the parish priest and his coadjutors had suppressed it in a few days. That was the more re tnarkable, fot• there was not in that neighbourhood a single resident magistrate nor any police force. He (Mr Barron) resided on the border of that county, but there was not a m,gi•trate between New Ross and the city of Waterford, a distance of nine miles, nor for a distance of IS miles in another direction, leaving, therefore, a large cans. sorao ergl p 0 0 4,20. at ba; 4 7,i L gS 6 ;0 ... tions , a° , r elit , erY .0, Nfauri,t.ffto Ts, vere g '` oocl, r iptio os ; cat 0 e ver, dos, " ld fr idaY , ' 5 -1 : 4 1 6 4 ite ; Co d. „ the 1,514 i. a s°'. ; tl; e ; a boe a; ~ , n as r o ty r el'a iotai t e bs; area of country without a single tnagistrate. That that part of the country was kept at peace by the exer tions of the Roman Catholic Priests, was, he thought, quite evident. Mr. THICKNESSE rose to present a petition from flMdley, in Lancashire. for the het•er observance of the Lord's Day.—(Loud cries of " Oh, oh !") The SPEAKER informed the Hon. Member that it was understuA that no petition, unless it related to the • Irish Bill, should he presented. Mr. THICKNESSE th•li withdrew it. Mr. JOHN 0 CONNELL pesented a petition against the Bill, siened t)r a great many of the inbab tants of the town of Ymehall. St. ' v i •tionsoa; . Mr. ROCHE presented four pPtitinns from the parishes and city of Lion-rick, agaihst the Irish Coercive Bill- The petition , rs deprecated in the strongest possible man nor, the me,sure, as lh ing totally unnecessary. They Air. O'CONNELL said that in no instance was any gentleman implicated in the outrages. Mr. RuT VEN supported the prayer of the Kilkenny Political Union petition, as a rnetober of that Union. Mr. J. FIELDEN presented a petition crow Oldham, signed by 5,000 persons, praying that a measure be brought in to annul the Protestant hierarcl y of Ireland, and in opposition to the Coercive Bill. Ai o, one from the Political Union of Royinn against the +nee Bill. The Hon. Member read the prayers of the petitions, which he considered to be much more import itit than having long speeches from Hon. Members.—(Hear, hear.) He also presented a petition from the county of Maya to the same effect. To the Hon. Member it appeared that the intrcductinn of a law into Ireland, by whirl! its inhabitants were to be transported to Canada, was really heartrending.—The petitions were ordered to lie on the table. An How. MEMBER wished to know whether it was the intention of the House to go on pi esenting these peti tions in the evening? Lord ALTHORP said " No." Mr. O'CONNELL and Mr. COBBETT expressed their hope that, at any rate, the seine course would be pursued on Monday as to-day. Adjourned till 5 o'clock. at .‘" O get flee al eve that the greatest part of Inland was in a state o perfect tranquillity, and tlia , tht• distuibe , l parts of it might b 3 easily re,.tored, by putting the law as it at present stood vigor,usly into execution. Mr. HALVES presented a petition from Newport against the Irish Coercive Bill, particularly against the clauses inflicting martial law, and preventing individuals from being at liberty to petition Parliament, and the petitioners hoped the Committee would exclude such clauses. An HoN. AIEMBEII was instructed to support the prayer of this petition, from his connexion with the place from whence it came—(Hear)—and he wished to take this opportunity of setting himself right with the House and the public, with regard to the course he had taken in respect of this measure, and which he had not had an opportunity of doing before.—(Older, order.) Mr. SPEAKER was sure the Hon. Member could not have been present the other day when the House expressed its dissent so unanitnoms'y as it did, when another H.n. Member proposed doing the same thing, otherwise the Hon. Member would not now have thought of making his observations. 1)t, CONTRACT FOR COPPER. GENE rArt„TMENT OF THE STOREKEEPF!I - ?FRE )lAsce 1, 1833. OF THE NAVY, SOMERSEI-PLACE, F.XE , CONFAIISSIONERS for --- . lIIRAt'UTING the OFFICE of LORD HIGH GREATAD !tRITA IN ° f the UN! I'ED KINGDOM of Th L , a and IRELAND, do hereby give Notice, that he e l d sl 'AT the 28th instant, at One o'clock, they will Cect rat ' t u ' r treat with such persons as may he willing to louuth, by'arrs,llpplying his Maj• sty's Drck-yard a: yid . , • 4 tt ons orbp;c p i e . 31st of Deicce,mttzir.: COPPER. 01',:', 1 4 "/ t , e r renderSlinTiaOLlT, I seen - at the said Office.. sf tr e ; er Will be received a y fter One o'clock on the tla . AIN f•,',,, ° , 4 any noticed unless the party attends, or an andttetyir° duly authorized in writing. he ap2` l " must be delivered at the above Office, Zlard of the All by a Letter addressed to the Secre ° res; n , A th ' i t 'fliralty, at Somerset-place, and Signed .by e Pers. o ,, 'e persons, engaging to become bound with P''ll 'aati " " i ngt iii the sum of 2,500/. for the due '..—....--.... -ftlie Contract. IH E , FOR EDINBURGH. STS tIT H AND LONDON NEW , / 1 0Y AL AM. S IPS, ROYAL WILLIAM having 'ottipw AnELAIDE, eact , 200 horse's power, 41 kair;,4 running during the Winter, are now appointed 1,1,1,14,4. z t t h h e e ir s p t, ass ii , : n , g th e , t ; a r , in g, e' e s ., Dock Wharf, London,as Itol, 41 ::s. ijlitipil,‘.lLLl km wag in Leith Harbour, • ' I 'AI -`, C ' '-' " ''' 1 Saturday, March t, at Ten, P.M. ,i, AT., ornmander.... Ito l g , l-S Ail}' o r'' , E, s a d jA IS. turday March 16, at Ten, P.M. 4 41' W I l..Zi'Anmer '''''''' a a t day ' M arch 23, at Ten, P r . ~ ,I , . AtlciA btLA l pr. ''''''''' : B, at u u r rdaY, March 30, at en, • • '",Y ffillntving Saturday till further notice. ir,t ctia,,RES, IN CLUDING PROVISIONS . . ''''' 1 4 0 ci,r 4e tri Unct iji,t, ............................................. 2 10 0 loft,,ag"' 1i0 r:e .. ;,...a . ; .... .. .. 6,, .. ..... ......... Freight as usual. re 44.4i'nstion obtained, berths secured, and , GoodsfAlso, b,;'11,:r1',./,'iPatent at the Leith and Glasgow N‘ ha ' ' ' ll Yrn °- 4".•rtsoo' 1 - ' rind ; H. Underwood, 56, I'4. 4htt; N. Sa' "'ul 64 . , o St ' Boar and Castle Inn. , thc a - . d11;;trsel; M. Shark, Old White Horse Cellar, . , C lita p , ; s , 4 d 111 r, t BlossomsLawretne P la d n e e d , istl, ~„''' / Where li h ' d are received, and forwar I'll ' ll till Five fi ts :Zvi:on the day of starting. JOSEPH ADAMS I . ase Agent. t,j TO 4 pER Leith an i st t C , Ly n Wharf. SOLD, t . t.t, Pu r ,„,, , EM PTO High Court ot . Cha.n tl;' °lad e i ll "i to an ordt•r of the u f - ,,410r, h4t , a cau.. e ,' BATEMAN v. BUTLER, E E R 4l ,' . ' , w o n n h e of ' 4 !it ' 0 " of John Edmund Dow e t11. :_lle ::irg,ol the said Court. at the Public Sale Room th ''ty.i,,,,.. "I'M situate in Southampton-buildings, I . .iii, 1;.. London, on Moni ta Y, t,,,,, i. ,4,1%,5 at 'two o'clock in th th e e af l te B r t n h ta d m a): of a hli d ", ° , oi ;..'? ESTATE, situateßay-street, in the Pr t '!" , i, t : l °,t James's, Clerkenwell, in the county of f ur t '''es, be)sssting of a Coal-shed, Dwelling-house, and s h 4. 4 rtii ' e r 'g No. 24, in Ray-street, aforesaid ; held trtled r °' ninety-nine years from Lady . . l a a y t.a , 1772) at a t j ilh , 0 1 4 t of 21. 104. Printed par o tity ce, South- N o 4 )0 bliaip(gratis) at the said Maser's Tall in whereof tie t ; %'''gs, aforesaid ; Mi. J. W. ; yllioers,srsos.lißci,t,,ovr,, 14?,,,,e4d Ili Ja mes -street, Bedford-row . f n Nl,lird "here, solicitors, Aldermanhury , and of Mr. .""doli, 'solicitor, No. 28, Bouverie-street, Fleet-street, , J u , UAli-;" Published, the First Niimherof 1-. e rANION to the NEWSPAPER ; 1 11 t° be ei • , the C,„„,. ( r?tinueo Monthly. Price Two Pence. . Otuer'Panon to the Newspaper . will be printed in tq ill hPenny 14 8 414 as the Magazine, and will contain k : S old l o 4 d ' o a ta ' • number. Charles Knight, Pall-mall East. it4llo,l'll Booksellers andNesvenders in the U nited 1 4 1 :,.._,.......... . a V ; and wholesale by the Agents of the P enny PI). Price as. Gd., comprising in quantity upwards of 300 ordinary, Svo. pages. p. Tli t tili S IEGE o s F El A t w c v E E R JOURNAL, il tiF ti l'w ,fur, NlA RCH ED contains the only full . and authentict.t.oaat-; , 1 1 4'- °` the si g f Antwerp. This faithfu . a .Thr,,pe of 'dost e ,.:Zt i i tv y haieeh e a o bs . or a b l e i d t.a t n h , e interest o . f all .t.: ti 4 ,!! l 4 tt i i % 4 origin I . with h o that e a n .. General CI, " til t 4 '''' 0 , the French Chief Engineer, n ti,,i ri,,aolt of the place—correct Portraits of 14 Plibli;tCoalatshal Gerard, with other drawings. ~It_'‘t tt, " 14 H. Colburn, by 11. Bentley, New Burling- 1 tt LPA RLI 11 - _ THIS DAY, FRIDAY, MARCH 8. tA i , , l ht p li t ° U , SE OF COMMONS. tR. took th e Ch a i r a f ew m i nutes pa s t tw e lv e till ip tee th e for e ce 4.obtained by an HoN. MEMBER to bring in a ii)'lial,rtatrt i mprovements in the Borough Market, in gi~ AIAk St . George the Martyr, Southwark. . r t i h lot K PHILIPS obtained leave to bring in a i t toll a t t ta :!road to branch from the Leicester and Lea -4 t 110 4 ‘ 1 % r " 4 .--liead a first time. tit ' •loa t t h-`'"ES obtained leave to bring in a Bill for 'tw e , n London and Greenwich.—Read a first Att, nth rn citinn of M r . HODGES the Bill for the im 1d4141. lo ud the drains and sewers in Cheltenham, was bay, me and committed. "C'N brought up the report of the Leicester 41111 ' an4.ti g t " , railway, and obtained leave to bring in Pl c lirthir'SbY brought in a Bill for the better reco- Tetia th e y lo- ..ts in th e township of Hyde, and other • ttlii,., 4 ntY of Chester. •"-rrip -- ',' - 'ht moved the second reading . of the Exeter Dir Aid hY Bill --Read and committed. _ a c t of the Imperial Gas Company, praying for an "'D° ra tion.—Leave was to v t° • ' l , l l.g t , Pro ps obtained leave to bring in a Bill Then' 'll;;; L iin roads i n C h es hi re, ca ll e d t h e Ch ester , 51)41 SP CA t",'"'side roads. rteal;et ed the I , then announced that the House bad trio l io ti ilcvate busines, He bed to recall to the Put o- 44 "- Members what had gee passed yesterday, B rll n to their p'ea.ure whether those pe• tioZ'"(ail t j w hich related to the Irish Disturbances Nes, ," presented. If, when all those had 1tt4;4110040`;',7, there was an opportunity, of course peti to, th4t h ue ' . ituhj .cts could be presented ; but he con tlll)a44 was not very sangui n e there would b e such r 'l4 14 • eu, Y.--(Laughter.) TLt4 its :"TEIS suggested that the names should be b*",,,1 appeared in the hooks of the House. ~.%I(ER said, of course ; it would he unfair t 1, .o ,t' e o f ti ff :M " the nsa i e of any ember who had other peti -4t th present. Gentlemen would have the kindness, petitions, to say whether tl u z presented their 1 ," O thers upon any other subject ;if they had, C t it :o - a ' al e ,"_ _Would of course remain,. but if they had not td I ,..xvould he struck , off. . I . I ,, t :C ) RGE LENNOX said the . lion. Member i lr 4 qt t , r 4) had his name down three time, anr same ) tictl'Nft,l4l theirs down four or five times. 7 (Hear. hie aid 11' the Hon. Member presented a petition to. " ti ki I t T i g t Petitions upon other subjects, he would have 14 5 t ,p 4 4 1 ,,, lOW on the list.—( Hear ) No name should gi rl 6e n "'re than once.—(Hear, hear.) He (Lord a l ed 4° ) had been every day in the House at eae . h 4 °Rli -4 % Y't he had been unable to present one of Ins Alr of L . made his constituents imagine he was nt KU s dui 'rty 40 01,, sad that all names beyond their first cl ot . Petit.; s truck out.—(l-lear.) He had now about ~4 tl if! . ,° fe ' ', ' , l Y ing in th e vote-office ready to present, ex -1.1„"lot1t or ten upon the subject of the Irish Bill, rio t) t . otak . e three . or four chances, he th e y c ame ) I ,q he justified in taking twenty chances.— IlL'ee „"e had, in fact, rejected petitions, because 114 fltild 4R her 5 ' l 4 upon him, and he bad sent them to " Nth 41 ,„,tiv e 6 01 the places from which they came. He T he tr 'at. all names down more than once, be to ,Sp e' ` 4 Y k Y'et e , d few words, It hoped the House would permit him t t . o 4 4 Y i tv o , tr, The object of the arrangement made 1' 0 1,4 )1 ia to 'aye time, but the result of this discus hon. t thelose ticne.—(Hear, hear.) It was iin• (if th e A ti le trlde : l c : l i lting meeting that the motion of the '"use be made ; but in calling the attention h 't eel," d'Be tt , ) , ed th e Petitions relative to the Bill that (4 tit ' 4 4 is t° "night every gentleman must know his t4 toat• tune ' Potiti on 4 'ce, " called, except under the pressure the pres en t, h e cou ld d ispose o f all Was ' 1 1(10 of I( 'N b • called, eon_ a r o , • Lout being car e the ttl it el and stated that as that gentleman fr o tikee 1,, , sickness be had co bi"urb °f • nfided to his n a the ti0,!.ti11,„:,,,,nts possession relating to the Irish i nhabi t , at '44 ' 4 1 13 (ge ar.) He then presented a petition Th e Petiti e o (4l4 tirf a ,, h i°ll ot Durnferlin, and one from the " et ° titat_,"gkinst the Irish Disturbance Bill. +tt viewed with great jealousy tOb.ril 11 Ilar o , "‘ 1 9 J Id, C .“5 U ; Eto n tj , ) 1 5 ; Ob e co ,e , ' ind 19, y / t. , 0 10 0 ) 0 0 16 0 r 0'; 11 '0 Yeod. 0 ly; 61 gg: t° I a't r to I; , 'i f ti ttOit Charictioti' 'Dean ° fans °° on ° f tbe Ci tir r ' i of oft ;° St " R, bl". igt) aged 610 k Li °P ;lac— ,d ...0 1 i ---- ,f 1 ag , 0 4 4, i tqll cl. 5 0 01 t ry 0 0 0 0, 1 19 rl 1803 1 0 1, 1 7 °,, 0 tY , F3 ‘2 k t-r. t 3d. • •) 5 ,3 O # , , O 0, ;70:74/ .0 4 ° . 36 5%. 0 1 ~ t o , 1 , ,," 0 13 the substitution of military for civil law, and prayed that House so to modify the Bill as to afford protection to life and property in that country without so far departing from the Constitution. Dr. BALDWIN presented a petition from Cork, signed by 20,000 persons against the Irish Disturbances Bill. The Hon. Gentleman stated that this was not a mob pe tition, but was signed by the most influential merchants and manufacturers of that city, who certainly had a better opportunity of getting authentic information as to the slate of Leland than the Government had, who were obliged to take it from a mercenary snurce.—(Hear.) The Hon. Member then presented petitions to the same effect from the parish of Ann's, Shandon, St. Mary, Shandon, Whitecturch, and St. Peter's, all in the city of Coik ; one from an individual named J Imes Mahoney, residing in Cork, from Hacketstown, and three other parishes in the county of Carlow, all to the same effect. One of the latter stated that that part of the country was now in a state of perfect tranquillity, notwithstanding the grievances they lihoured under, from the manner in which the tithes were collected. The pe titioners further stater!, that they viewed the provisions of this Bill with such horn r, th rt they were now actually selling off their property, in order to emigrate to Ame rica, and liy that means escape from the tyranny of the English Government. A MEMBER. considered that the Hon. Member who had presented the petitions, and the other gentlemen who were opporied to ere measure, bad entirely misrepresented the state of feeling as to the question on Ireland. They had stated that the whole of the Irish population were opposed to this measure. Now he would take upon him self to say that a numerous and influential body were in its favour, by far more respectable than those who opposed it, and he had no hesitation in say rig that those Hun. Members who supported the measure would receive the gratitude of their constituents for doing so. Mr. BLACKNEY said that in consequence of his name being so low upo❑ the list, he had requested his Hen. Friend D,. Baldwin to present the petitions for him. One of them contained the sianatures of no less than 1,500 per sons. The petitions had been in his possession fur the last ten days, but in consequence of the regulations of the House, he had been totally unable to present them. He would not occupy the time of the House, but he trusted they would allow him to state that lie had seen the spot where the burning of corn had taken place at Hacketstown, and he could say that no outrage bad taken place in that parish for the last twelve months. The same observation would hold good with respect to Forres and several other parishes. At another opportunity he would make some statements in the hope of convincing the Noble Lord opposite that the county of Carlow was not in that dis turbed state in which it was generally supposed to be. Mr. WILKS trusted that Hon. Members would not enter into discussions like the present upon the presenta tion of petitions.— ( Hear, heat, hear.) An Hots. 111EarBER. trusted that the House would allow him to make a few rernarks.—(Hear.) He thought it would be as well that petitions should be the spontaneous effusions of the petitioners. With respect to the present petitions, he did not consider them to be so. He held i❑ his hand the copy of a letter, purporting to be written by Mr. O'Connell, and dated 14, Albemarle-street ; whether that was the residence of the Hon. Member he did not know, but the writer trusted that the people would resist the atrocious measures brought in by Earl Grey for the coercion of Ireland. In another part be had requested that his name might be used to conjure the people to be peaceable, and to commit no outrage or vio lence. In the opinion of the Hon. Member, the previous part of the letter was rather calculated to increase than allay violence. The letter went on to say— The SPEAKER said he must interrupt the Hon. Member in the course he was pursuing.—(Hear, hear, bear.) It might indeed be very true that what was stated in that letter had something to do with the subject before the House, but it did not re late immediately to the contents of the petition. The House was assembled for the purpose of receiving peti tions. It had taken a most unusual step, and one that would not be authorized, but for the pressure of business before the House...a-(Hear, bear, hear.) Language and topics of the description referred to by the Ho nourable Member, would, in common fairness, require robe replied to—(Hear, hear)—and he put it to the House whether, if the course pursued by the Hon. Member was persisted in, the business of the House could be carried on with fairness to every Member.—(Hear, hear.) Lord ALTHORP feared that if such a discussion were pursued, the whole object of the House for the presenta tion of petitions on the subject of the Irish Disturbances Bill, would he frustrated.—(Hear, hear.) What the Hon. Member bad stated would be very proper matter for discussion on the second reading of the Bill.—(Hear.) In that discussion it would be determined what weight should be given to the petitions presented ; and he hoped that no such discussion would be persisted in, whilst the peti tions were being presented, that the intentions of the House might not be frustrated.—(Hear.) Petition ordered to be laid on the table. Mr. CURTEIS complained of some alteration on the Speaker's list, by which petitions had been taken out of turn.—(Cries of " Oh.") Mr. SPEAKER asked if the Hon. Member bad any petition to present on the Irish Bill. Mr. CURTEIS had a petition to present from the inhabitants of Battle, in Sussex, against the Bill. The petitioners stated the r dismay at the measures introduced by his Majesty's Government, and proposed as a remedy f n the distresses of the lower classes in Ireland, that poor laws should be established in that country.—(Liear, hear.) For himself, the Hon. Member would say, that although he had voted in opposiion to what was the prayer of the petitioners, and that conscientiously, yet lie could with equal consistency join in the recommendation of the introduction of poor laws.—(Hear, hear.)—Petition laid on the table. Mr. BARRON presented a petition against the Bill, from the parish of Trinity Without, in Dublin. The Hon. Mernser then p. eeented one of a similar nature from the inhabitants of the city of Waterford, agreed to at a public meeting. That meeting was convened before the letter alluded to by the Hon. Member was known to the inhabitants of Waterford. lie (Mr. Barron) would tell that Hon. Member that the inhabitants of Waterford hail sufficient sense and discrimination to enable them to deter mine when to petition, without the dic at un of any tnan.—(Hear, hear, hear.) He would not have said any thing which might tend to provoke a discussion, if at had not been for the ill-tuned remarks of the Hon. Member.—(Hear.) The inhabitants of the city of Water tsrd, in pray , ng that the Bill might not be passed into a law, said that the petitioners were of opinion it would only increase the feeling of animosity between the two countries.—( Hear.) It had already excited considerable animosity between opposite parties in Ireland—(Hear) — and was calculated to lead to a separation between Ire land and England.--(Hear, hear, hear.) Mr. O'CONNELL said he was convinced of the neces sity of presenting petitions without any unnecessary dis ctession, but lie wished merely to ray a word, as be under stood that in his absence his name had been made use of. He could assure the House that the people of Ireland felt deeply upon this subject, and his advice bad been to petition against it; that was the constitutional means of ex pressing the people's opinion, and be was convinced the advice he had given was the best. He cared little for the imputations which might he made upon him for giving that advice. The Host. MEMBER, who had alluded to the Hon. and Learned Member fur Dublin, observed that he did not wish to make any imputation upon that Honourable Gen tleman, but he merely wished to show that those peti tions were not the spontaneous effusions of the persons from whom they came. Mr. BARRON then presented a petition from the pa rish of Glandine, in the county of Waterford, also against time measure, and assured the House that it was the voluntary petition of the persons who signed it. They stated that that part of the country was in a state of perfect quiet, and that there had not been, in their neighbourhood, a single outrage within the last twelve months. He also presented a petition from the parish of St. Patrick, in the city of Waterford, against the Bill. The Hon. Member begged to be allowed to read a paragraph from a letter which he bad received from the agent of the Bank of Ireland. in Waterford. The writer said—" I have now to defend myself against a run for gold, which commenced two or three days ago, and self-preservation, as you know, is the first law of nature." That letter was from a most re spectable gentlemau (Mr. Thomas Scott), who was agent of the Bank of Ireland at Waterford, and formerly an ex tensive banker there himself; so that it appeared that the acts of the Government were now producing the very effects which he (Mr. Barron) bad anticipated. The HON. MEMBER dirt not intend to go into the sub ject at any length.__(Cries of " Order, order," and " Chair, chair.") Mr. SPEAKER said, that the Hon. Member would consider for hici,s,lf, whether he was to be in a better situation than other Members of the House. He was about to make observations which he might make this very day, upon the second reading of the Bill, and as the rule of the House was, that an Honourable Member should not speak twice on the saint subject ; if the Hon. Member now made his observations, and also spoke when the Bill was discussed upon the se cond reading, then he would have an advantage which other Hon. Members had ❑ot. The lioN. MEMBER. would assure the House that it was not his intention to occupy much time.—(Order, order, and confusion.) Mr. O'CONNELL trusted the Honourable Mem ber, as he could not be heard now, would take the opportunity of making his observations upon the second reading of the Bill, which he was sure would be heard with great respect, coining from so high an authority.—(Hear, hear.) Mr. T. ATTWOOD presented a petition from a great number of the inhabitants of Birmingham, agreed to at a public meeting, praying the House not to pass the Irish Coercive Bill. The petitioners stated that it was but five months ago since they had defied all danger, to support liberty and a liberal Parlia ment—( Hear, heir)—and that the same people were now equally determined not to support a Bill for the anni illation of all liberty in Ireland. It was impossible, the petitioners stated, that the psople of England could sup port a civil war against Ireland. They had heard with great anxiety an idea of the repeal of the Union raised, hut if Irishmen were not to he permitted to enjoy all the bless ings of liberty which England partook of, they would feel it to be their duty to come to a determination, by all the means in their power, to obtain a repeal of the Union. The next petition he should present was from 210 inhabi tants of Wednesbury, in Staffordshire, with a similar prayer; also a petition from Walsall, signed by 3,200 persons, being a greater number than had ever before signed a petition front that place. The peti tioners prayed that a rigid inquiry might be instituted into the state of the sister country, with the view to redress the innumerable wrongs with which she bad been so long afflicted. The next petition was from Stoke upon-Trent, signed by 2,300 persons, praying the House to reject every particle of the Irish Coercive Bill, on the ground of its being subversive of the unalienable rights of British subjects. The next petition was from the borough of Marylebone, signed by three hundred persons to the same effect, as also petitions front Ballydean, in Ireland, signed by 460 persons ; a parish in Limerick, signed by 370 persons, and another from Gore, in Lei trim, stating the opinion of the petitioners to he, that the only use of the Coercive Bill could be to accomplish ob• jests which his Majesty's Ministers did not now avow. (Hear, hear, hear.) The petitioners deprecated the Bill, among other reasons, because it rendered their homes no longer safe, exposed their wives and dauehters to be torn from their sides, and imprisoned as well as themselves, not in a public gaol, but in the house perhaps of some private enemy. Tne Hon. Member concluded the pre sentation of his petitions by one from Allaston, in Warwickshire, signed by 700 persons, and another from a parish in Worcestershire, both against the Bill He would not at present make any speech on the subject. He would merely say that he cordially supported the prayer of all the petitions and conjured his Majesty's Ministers to pause before they went farther with a measure so calculated to plunge Ireland into a scene of confusion and anarchy. Mr. HUME said he had six petitions from England and one from Scotland to present on this subject. The first was by 1.330 inhabitants of London and its neighbourhood, and they stated that they viewed with pain and indien tion, the introduction of a measure to suspend the H ibeas Corpus Act in Ireland, and to make the officers of the army, who were not to be expected with any princip'es of law, substitutes for the judaes of the land. They implored the House would proceed in the spirit of justice and con ciliation towards Ireland, and throw out this Bill. The next was from the inhabitants of Hounslow ; they stated their alarm at the measure, and prayed that the use would throw out the Bill as unconstitutional and worthy only of an autocrat. The next was from Stroudwater. The petitioners stated that they viewed with alarm the disturbed state of Ireland, but they viewed with abhorrence this measure, which would put an end to the liberties of Irishmen, who had bled for their country. They prayed the House to throw out this Bill and pro ceed in a spirit of conciliation by the suppression of tithes and church rates. The next was from the Political Unionists of Kenilworth, in the county of Warwick. They stated that they were filled with alarm at the terrible measure which had so hastily passed the House of Lords, which had excited them to send that petition, imploring the House of Commons to spare the distress of unfortunate Ireland, and throw out that frightful Bill ; and that it the sword must be drawn on Ireland, it should be the sword of Justice only. The next was from the Political Unionists of Leamington ; they prayed that House to spurn a mea sure which was so fraught with n,i•chief, and which was so likely to be subsersive of the Constitution. The Hon. Member then presented a petition from the Political Union of Bannockburn. stating that the peti tioners viewed wi t h th e gre atest abhorence the measure which had been introduced by his Majesty's Government for the coercion of Ireland at a time when all were in expectation of kindness and good-will towards Ireland. —(Hear, bear.) The petitioners prayed that the House would not pass the Bill, but would grant full re dress for the grievances of Ireland, abolish all sine cures and adopt some measures for the better distribution of church property. Sir WILLIAM FOLKES presented a petition from Coke in Norfolk, stating that the petitioners had heard with astonishment the account of the number of murders and outrages which had 'been committed in Ireland, and praying that the House would cvithout delay introduce such measures as might be expedient to put down such atro cities, and brine the instigators and perpetrators to punishment whatever their situation or rank in life mat be.—(Hear, hear, especially from Mr. O'Connell.) Mr. FERGUS O'CONNOR presented petitions from Kilworth, Killaloe. Skihereen, and several other place• in the county of Cork against the Irish Coercive Bill. The Hon. Memher then presented a petition, very nume rously signed, from the inhabitants and landowners 04 Miteheitown, and another place, in the county of Cork The petitioners stated that they had heard, with feelings of bitter distress, that martial lair was to be the firs , boon offered by a reformed House of Parliament to a people who had been chiefly instrumental in passing the Reform Bill.—(Hear, heir, hear.) They were suprised at the credulity of the Irish Government, and of the British Ministry, in believing the statements which had been foisted upon then,.—(Hear.) They stated tha those statements have chiefly, if not entirely, proceeded from the Conservative Societies, which bad already done their utmost to prove that the late reform measures oi the present Ministry were purely revolutionary; and the , it was their aim now to bring his Majesty's Ministers into disrepute.—(Hear, hear.) The petitioners further stated that the county (Cork) was in an extremely tranquil state, of which. as the principal inhabitants of the West hiding of that county they were competent to judge and speak The petition alas stated, that at a recent assizes in the county Cork, the perfect tranquillity of that district had been alluded to by the E irl of Bantry, in the presence or many Magistrates and other persons of influence. And that, in the came month, January last, at a very lacer meeting of Magistrates, Catholic priests, and others, eon versant with the real state of the country, held at Skihe reen, the same statements as to the peaceful state of the county of Cork, were made and confirmed.—(Hear ) This, then, was the opinion of the well informed inhabi• tints of the baronies of Taimore, Orrery, and Kellock, Protestants as well as Catholics. The last petition to which he had to call the attention of the House, was from Duskane, in the same county, and which struck at the root of the evil—namely, at the Arch-Agitator himself.— (Hear, hear.) The petitioners, in common with him self (Mr. Fergus O'Connor), and with the great ma jority of the inhabitants of Ireland, considered that the Right Hon. Secretary for Ireland had occasioned more ruin and destruction to Ireland than any other evil that had visited the country.—(Hear, hear.) It mattered not to the inhabitants of Ireland, whether the acts of that Minister proceeded from gross ignorance, or from a spirit of the deepest hostility against Irishmen, hut by these acts he continued to add insult to injury.—(Hear, hear.) And he joined most emphatically in the prayer of the petitioners, that the Right Hon. Secretary for Ireland might he itnire diately removed from the administration of affairs in Ireland. He had now presented several petitions on the subject of the coercive measure now passing through that House. He bad presented them all from the county of Cork. This was a circumstance which was very important, espe cially after the statement which had been Made in another place, that the state of that county (Cork) was such as to demand the immediate passing of this Bill into a law. If, therefore, no disturbance existed in that county, and he could bear testimony to the fact that there was none concurrently with the statements contained in those petitions, as he could also prove from various letters he had received from magistrates in different parts of the county ; if, be repeated, Government had failed in proving that disturbances existed in the county of Cork, it was the imperative duty of that House to look minutely, and with much jealousy, into the evidence which his Majesty's Ministers had produced before them, He did assert, without fear of contradiction, that that county was never in a more tranquil state than at present, and with regard to an observation made by an Hon. Member this morning, be must say if his constituents had not by their petitions repudiated the imputation which hail been thrown upon them, by stating the exact situation of the country, he should have immediately delivered up the trust they had confided to him, and cease to be their representative in that House. He would not now enter in shier into this question, as he would have other opportunities of giving his opinions on the Bill. He would, however, strenuously oppose it in every stage of its progress. He would merely now state, in the middle of the day, when not inflamed—(A laugh)— that his opinion of the Bill was, that it should be riven over into the hands of the common hangman.—(Renewed laughter.) It established to his mind, most com pletely, the melancholy, truth of an observation of Lord Chancellor Burleigh, that the people could never be ru ined but by Parliaments. The present measure was an instance of it, and he had no hesitation in saying, that the Ministers who bad advised his Majesty to propose this measure, and had brought it into that House for adoption, deserved impeachment at the Bar of the House, and if found guilty under that impeachment, deserved to suffer the extreme penalties of the law„—(Loud cries of " Hear," and " Oh, oh Mr. O'CONNELL and Mr. G. S. BARRY supported the prayer of the petitions, and bore testimony to the peaceable state of the county of Cork. Mr. BUCKINGHAM presented a petition from the inhabitants of Sheffield in the county of York, being members of the Political Union in that town. The pe titioners expressed their knowledge that Ireland had long been afflicted by misrule and numerous grievances, and they therefore were glad to learn that measures of relief were contemplated by his Majesty's Government, but they also stated that they witnessed with much pain and indignation that a Bill for the adoption of severe measures towards Ireland, which nothing but imperious necessity could justify,—a ne. cessi , y which they could not see at present existed. The petitioners prayed that the remedial measures might speedily be passed into law, and that the coercive measure might be postponed three months, in order that its neces sity might be satisfactorily established before it was finally adopted by the House. The Hon. Member concurred heartily in the views and desires of the petitioners. Ile approved highly of the remedial measures proposed by his Majesty's Ministers, deprecated the speedy progress of the coercive measures, and hoped the latter would be postponed until the effect of the former being passed into a law had been ascertained. —(Hear, hear.) Mr. PARKER craved the indulgence of the House, while he stated shortly the reason which induced him not to support the prayer of this petition. He considered that the eirettinst,nces of imperious necessity which the petitioners said would justify the measure, had already arisen. In his judgment, if a Bill similar to !his had not been brought in by Ministers, very son one still more severe in its provisions would have b come necessary. Government would have deserved the indigo nation of the country if they bad not etept in arid met the necessity of the ease by endeavouring to proud the peaceable subjects of the King in the midst of that state of anarchy, deprivation, and outrage, which be was sorry to see pervaded the sister kingdom.— (Hear, hear.) This was the sole reason why he could not support the prayer of this petition. He had a perfect right to say that he did not concur with it, and he protested against the imputations thrown out by Members on the opposition side of the House, as if they were the sole guardians of the Constitution, and monopo lized all regard to the liberties, and peace, and happiness of Ireland. Mr. O'CONNELL denied that the Hon. Gentleman who had just sat down had a sincere desire to protect the Constitution. The Hon. Gentleman seemed on all occa• sions to be ready to adept assertion for proof, and he now set himself up in favour of courtsmartial.—(No, no, from Mr. Parker.) That was a part oh the Bill, however, but as the Hon. Gentleman repudiated it, it was to be hoped that he would give him (Mr. O'Connell) his support. Whoa assertions were to be made evidence, it was too much for those to reproach the Irish Members, who were actually taking away protection from innocence under the pretence of punishing the guilty. Lord ALTHORP did not wish to interfere in the dis cussion of petitions, but he could not sit still and hear an attack made on a gentleman who bad as full a right to state his reasons for supporting a measure as those who had opposed it... 4 Hear, hear.) Mr. RICHARDS, in supporting the prayer of the pe tition, begged to set himself Eighties to what he had stated on a former night, which had been denied by the Hon. Member for Roscommon, on the authority of a private letter. He (Mr. R.) had since found out the clergyman to whom he then alluded, and he had seen both him and his wife.—(Laughter.) What he then stated bad been grossly misrepresented in a newspaper. That clergymen was now perfectly ready to prove his statement at the bar of the House.—(" Name, name," from Mr. O'Connell, followed by " No, no.") Ho had no objection to girt the name, as he had the authority of the clergyman him - self to do so ; but if he named him, he must make a few ohservations to protect the credit of his own statement. There were but three discrepancies between his statement and that of the clergyman. One was, that the clergy man did not make use of the " town part," as he (Mr. Richards) had stated, but that was not material. Another was, that he had stated the clergyman to have a living of 4001. a-year, whereas the fact was that the living was of that value, but he only got 601. a-year. The third was, that the clergyman had not established a dispensary in the town as he (Mr. H.) had stated, but had established one in his own house. The clergyman was however willing to prove, that he was shot at while going into his own house, and that he was afterwards shot at again while ,Ikine with another clergyman, and was badly wounded. He could prove also, that his grounds had been torn up. that he had a small fortune, part of which he dispensed to the poor, and that he was obliged to leave Ireland in con consequence of the system which prevailed.—(Cries of " Name.") Having stated this much, he would now say, •hat it was the Rev. Mr. Creigh. Major BEAUCLERK said that while he felt bound to oppose the measure in every stage, he would give the Hon. Gentleman opposite (Mr. Parker) full credit for the .onesty of his motives.—The pi tition was then ordered to lie on the table. Mr. CHARLES BULLER presented a petition from Liskeard against the Bill tkat had been erought into the House, signed by above 200 persons. The petitioners lamented the proceedings which had taken place in Ireland ; hut they attributed them to long exist ing grievances which had oppressed that country. They were of opinion that by the abouition of tithes, and the removal of religious disqualifications, great benefits would be conferred upon the country ; and they prayed the House not to support the exercise of arbitrary power. The Hon. Member stated that the opinions of the petitioners were shared by the great majority of the inhabitants of the West of England.—(Hear, hear.) His Majesty's Ministers might protest that the powers contained in the Bill were not to he employed in the collection of tithes, but the pen. ple of England entertained an opinion that they would be employed to uphold the tithe system and to punish those who resisted the payment of tithes. He should support the r•rey e r of the petitioners by his vote in every stage of the Bill. Mr. LALOF. presented a petition from Ballynachin, in Queen's County ; also, a petition from Maryborough, another from Montreith, and several others from parishes in Queen's County, against the Irish Coercive Bill. The petitioners denied that the county was in a state of dis turbance requiring any violent measures to produce qui etude. They all considered that the law as it at present stood, if impartially administered, was quite sufficient to overcome the disturbances. The Hon. Gentleman said he had also a great many petitions from small county towns throughout the country to the same effect. The reason of those small petitions having been sent to him—and he believed the House would be inundated, very soon, with similar petitions from other puts—was, that the people had an im pression, that there was a feeling already, that large meetings should not take place for the purpose of petitioning Parlia ment. The Hon. Gentleman had no doubt that one halt of the horrible outrages which had been detailed to the House had never taken place.---(Hear, hear.) Of his own knowledge he knew that many facts which had been de posed to before the committee List year respecting the state of Ireland had never taken place. Mr. J. GRATTAN, from being connected with this part of the county, felt it to be his duty to state that few or no outrages were known in Queen's County, and to the honour of the gentry of that county, they bad always been ready to discharge their duty when called upon. For his own part be was a landed proprie tor of the county, and he should be always ready to discharge his duty in support of the established laws ; and as the best mode of discharging his duty on the present occasion, he would repeat to night the vote he gave a few nights ago against the measure now proposed, as the only way lie could conscientiously act in support of the laws of his country.—(Cheers.) Mr. BROTHERTON presence t a petition from certain individuals, Members or friends of the Political Union of Salford. He begged to observe, that no new Member had entered that House with a greater desire to support his Maj-sty's Government in their measures of eco nomy and retrenchment than himself, but the measure now proposed to be carried for the tranquillization of Ire land, was so different from what he had expected, that he could not support it.—(Hear, hear.) He was impressed with the belief that conciliatory measures would have a greater effect than any coercive measures which may be brought in. Conciliatory measures had never been tried ; but coercive measures bad been tried, and had always failed.—Petition laid upon the table. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said that as the repre tentative of Dublin, he had been intrusted with two peti tions relating to this Bill, one of them against it, and the other in its favour. The former was adopted at a public meeting numerously attended, and was most numerously signed. He was bound to say also that he could vouch for the respectability of the persons signing it. The petitioners thought that the evils of Ireland arose from misgovern. ment, and that the cure for them was conciliation. They were opposed to the Bill at present before the House on account of its unconstitutional nature, and thought that no such Bill ought to pass, except in a case of the greatest necessity. He (the Solicitor-General) most heartily concurred in the general principles retie. , upon by the petitioners ; but he should be unwortl.y to represent them, if he did not say that he considered the extraordinary emergency to w hicl , tl ey referred had now arrived, and that it was absolutely necessary to pass an unconstitutional measure. The other petition was from the magistrates, bankers, clergy, and other rate payers of Dublin, who stated that they saw with deep sorrow it was necessary on account of the state to which Ireland was reduced to adopt strong legislative measures to subdue the lawless spirit and dangerous associations now existing in that country.— (Hear, hear.) They prayed the House, therefore, whilst they take measures to remove the real grievances of Ireland, they wool , ' also take measures to put down the open violations of the law which now disgraced thai country, and to restore a secure protection of life ano property. Mr. O'CONNELL wished to know how many clergy men had signed that petition ? For the last that was pre sented in favour o f the Bitt out of '75 signatures, had those of 5 clergymen. The clergy of England appeared to hay. a kind of esprit du corps, or f e llow-teeling with the clergy in Leland. which it was al, eirable to note. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said he did not know how many clergymen had signed the petition ; he had merely recognised the signature of Dr. Booker. Colonel BUTLER presented six petitions from Bally. , raget, and other parishes in the county of Kilkenny, against the Bill. He stated that, at a meeting of the magistracy in Kilkenny, it was resolved, that the law was at present quite strong enough, if the Maeistracy would only cooperate one with another, and even if the local magistracy did not do their duty, there were three stipendiary Magistrates in the county, who ought to do theirs. The people of Ireland, notwithstanding all that had been said still believed that the Bill was for the purpose of collect ing tithes at the point of the bayonet. He would not at present say more, as he hoped he should have an oppor tunity at a future time to state his opinions upon the atro city of the attempt to coerce Ireland. Mr. FINN supported the prayer of the petitioners. Mr. SULLIVAN presented several petitions from pa riches in the county and city of Kilkenny, against the Bill. He wished to have said a few words upon the sub ject, but as the sense of the House was against that course at present, he hoped be should have another oppor t unit i y ie o ti f ostNa.titA:g lE hatissE oxpinihn n on pr a e,, f e u n tu te r d e s a tag p e e o ,i f ti t o h n e Bill. front the inhabitants of St. Kermit), in the city of Kilkenny, praying the House to g rant the means of im p roving the h ar bo u rs, roads, and waste land s of th e countr y , which wou ld amply repay the State , employ the peop l e , and t o e render it totally unnecessary to enact any laws har rowing to the hearts of a feeling people.—(Hear, bear.) The Honourable Member also presented a petition from the members of the Trades' Political Union of Kilkenny. The petitioners stated, that so far from the ends of jus tice being impeded by the intimidation of juries, Mr. Justice Tot rent had congratulated the jury on their perseverance and determination in convict ng persons who bad been guilty of committing outrages, and since that period be was happy to say no disturbances had taken place in that part of the country. Upon his own authority he could state, that as far as Kil kenny was concerned, there was no necessity whatever COURT CIRCULAR. His Majesty left town on Wednesday evening on his return to the Palace at Windsor. The Duke of Cumberland entertained the Directors of the Concert of Ancient Music at dinner on 'Wednesday evening, at his residence in St. James's Palace. Lords Kenyon, Cawdor, and Burghersh were of the party. His itoyal Highness, who was Director for the evening, went afterwards, accompanied by his Noble guests, to witness the performance. The Duchess of Kent and the Princess Victoria walked arid drove yesterday for some time in Hyde Park. The day fixed upon as one of thanksgiving for the cessation of the cholera morbus in this country, at the King's Council, on Wednesday, is the 12th May. The Lord Chancellor and Lord Plunket visited Earl Grey yes. terday, at the Treasury; THE STANDING ARMY. E MINORITY ICLUDED) WHO TOTED WITH MR. TUNIBERS OF I STAN:,ING ARMY IND, AND THE COLONIES. O'Connell, Morgan—Meath O'Connell, John —Youghall O'Dwyer, A. C.—Drogheda O'Connor, Fergus—Cork Co. Ruthven, Edward—Kildare Ruthven, E. S.—Dublin Ronayne, D.—C onmelll Baldwin, Dr. I-L —Cork City David—Limerick ISheil, R. I...—Tipperary Vigors, N. A.—Carlow TELLERS. LIST OF TH., OF T'WENTY.THREE (TELLERS IN► HUME FOR A RETURN OF THE N IN ENGLAND, SCOTLAND, IRELA ENCLISH. Cobbett, William—Oldham Faithful, G.—Brighton Fielden, John—Oldham Ingilby, Sir \V.—Lincoln Moreton, Hon. H.—Gloucester Hume, Joseph—Middlesex 'Davies, Colonel—Worcester. SCOTCH. Gillon, &c. IRISH. Daunt, W. J.—Mallow Fitzsimon, C.—Dublin Co. O'Connell, D.—Dublin City O'Connell, Maurice—Tralee SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. (THIS DAY.) FROM I. LO Y D'S. DEAL, 31sacit 7.- I :And N.N.E. strong breezes.—Arrived from the river and sailed, the British Monarch, Stewart, and Huskisson, Hurst, for Jamaica ; Julian, Smith, for New York ; and Cybele and John (brigs) for the westward. The combined squadron remain; as also the Canning and George the Fourth, outward bound. PLYMOUTH, Maacit 6.—Wind A.. fresh.—Sailed his Ma jesty's ship Griffin for South America. FALMOUTH, MARCH 6.—Wind N. fresh gales and squally. DOVER, Matteis 7.—Arrived off-port the King Fisher, Parry, from Demerara. MARGATE, Maw( 7.—Arrived off-port the Goodintent, M`Donall, from Terceira. POOLE, MARCH 6.—Arrived the Joseph, Locke, from Cadiz. BRISTOL, MARCH 7.—Arrived the Bristol from New York, and Ceres, from St. Petersburgh. LIVERPOOL, MARCH 6.—Arrived the Arkwright, Bernie, from Savannah ; and South America, Marshall, from New York. BARDSEY,MAacri 6.—Arrived the Pomona from Charleston. The Doctor, from New Orleans to Mobile, was on shore on Pelican Island, with four feet water in her hold. The Greenwood, Smithson, was driven on shore near Wells, on Wednesday evening, and was in a dangerous situation. Arrived at Bombay, the Huddersfield, Noakes; and Robert, Quayle, from Liverpool. Arrived at New York, the Britannia, Sketchley ; Orpheus, Cobb ; and Tay, Macready, from Liverpool ; and Camillus, Nevins, from the Clyde. Arrived at Charleston, the George Wilkinson, Mackay, from Liverpool. Arrived at Boston, the Liverpool Raistow, from Liverpool. Arrived at Savannah, the Jane, Banton, from Liverpool. Arrived at Virginia, the Susan, Nicholson, from Virginia. Extract of a letter frem the Agent to Lloyd's at Milford, dated 6th March :—" A large trunk, marked ' Captain Foote,' was picked up last Saturday, by James Hadow, of Dumstone, St. Bride's Bay, said to contain ladies' silk dresses, music books, gold watch and seals, purse, and prayer book, marked ' Augusta Foote.' There is on shore near St. David's, a trunk, having a plate under the lock, marked as follows—` No. 7, E. Watt, 81. M.,' containing morning.gown, shirts, flannel waistcoats, drawers, two towels, six stocks, shoes, &e., and part of a steamer's hand.rail." The Symmetry, Saville, from Jamaica, hai arrived in the 1 Downs. SPORTING INTELLI-ENCE. TATTERSALL'S. Two or three alterations occurred in the Derby betting. Revenge became first favourite by half a point, and is likely to make a further advance. The Moses colt was reported to be " coughing," and fell back to 20 to 1, offers were made to take '5 to 1. Ishmael is repeatedly the subject of talk, and offers to bet and take the odds are constantly made, but of so indefinite a nature, that we are unable to state any price. It is rumoured that if he goes to Newmarket it will be to George Edwards's stables, and not to Lord Jersey's regular trainer, Mr. James Edwards. A few bets were made on the Riddlesworth and St. Leger ; the odds averaged as follows :-- RIDDLESWORTH. Forester ßeve (t e (taken) (taken) n) a to a 'sr Prince Llewellyn (taken) Revenge sto 2 ags t Anglesea i 9to 2 apt Arethissa ti to 1 agst Silvertail (taken) 7 to 1 agst L ucius OATL A NOS. 9 to 1 agst Lord Exeter's Be ira m DERBY. to apt g:a t t mi M sr r r u w n l t e i to I apt Mr. Ridsdale's Glaucus l► to a 19 to 1 agst Lord Exeter's Emmeline colt 20 to 1 agst Duke of Rutland's Moses's dam c. 25 to 1 agst Colonel Cosby's Bravo 25 to 1 agst Lord Graham's Twatty colt OAKS. 10 to 1 agst Duke of Grafton's Octave (taken) 10 to 1 agst Lord Chesterfield's 'Weeper 15 to 1 agst Lord Chesterfield's Fanny Grey 16 to 1 agst Lord Exeter's Sister to Augustus (taken) . ST. LEGER. 11 to 1 apt Mr. Watts's Belshazzar (taken) - • 13 to 1 agst Mr. Vansittart'S Rock in g ham (taken) • - 15 to 1 agst Mr. Gully's Frankentein (taker - )' • 13 to 1 agst Lord Cleveland's Muley Moloch wreTckh,ein numb er al O s f a vvye,ss hoestlitthjraonUugarhy, sp B i l p 6 .. to the latest period th e same can be made out, 11 , 52; 13 i,f which were ne ver beard of, arid the crews are gyp. p osed to have per ished. The crews of 28 were entirely ~red, and of the remaining 11 they were only partially since e t i eared.