The Sun. — London, England, 1833-01-30 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. The debate on the appointment of the Speaker last night was more perplexed, and indeed tedious, than might have been expected. The proposer and seconder of Mr. Manners Sutton were, as we had previously stated, Lord Mor peth and Sir Francis Burdett. Mr. Hume pro posed, and Mr. O'Connell seconded, the nomi nation of Mr. Littleton. It is singular that it should have been gravely asserted by these gentlemen and others, that Mr. M. Sutton, if elected, might retain his retiring pension with the usual salary of the Speakership, and thus nothing would be saved to the country by his again taking the chair. Neither was this matter completely set right till towards the latter end of the debate, when the act was produced, by which it appeared that the Speaker does not cease to be such till the appointment of a new one, many of the functions of the office being liable to be exercied in the interval between an old and a new Parliament. What income, then, has Mr. Manners Sutton received up to the present time ? That of the acting Speaker, 6,0001. a-year. He has never been placed upon the retired allowance. It is certain, that upon his finally quitting the chair at any future period. he will, without any fresh enactment, be entitled to the 4,0001. pension already voted to him. The House, therefore, have no hold, in one sense of the term, on his future conduct. This is true. But it is not for what he may henceforth do, hut for what he has already done, that the 4,0001. have been (as usual) granted; and nothing which he may henceforth do can render his past la bours and services, up to the present time, undone. Mr. M. Sutton, there is no doubt, was un favourable to Reform, Mr. Littleton supported the measure, and hence it was attempted to be inferred, that the Reform Ministers have pro moted their enemy, and rejected their friend. But it is evident that it was not to please the Conservatives, but to defeat the Conservatives, that Mr. Sutton was proposed by Ministers, for had Ministers offered Mr. Littleton or Mr. Abercrombie to the House, the Conservatives would have immediately proposed Mr. M. Sut ton, through principle and friendship, and the Economists (ay, those very men who now cry out for Mr. Littleton) would have supported the nomination on the plea of saving or retrench ment. The whole of this matter is perfectl\ understood by the intelligent public. We are only surprised that the contingency of the new Speaker's grasping his retiring pension along with his salary should have been represented as possible. Mr. Sutton, while he expressed his firm conviction that the pension could not le gally belong to him, together with the salary of Speaker, disavowed, even were it otherwise, in the strongest terms, all idea of receiving both sums, as Mr. Littleton rejected the honour in tended him by Mr. Hume, Mr. O'Connell, and their followers. A division took place after a debate of three hours, when the numbers were 241 to 31, in favour of Mr. M. Sutton. The House has thus secured for itself its most experienced Member to regulate its debates, and the country gains 4,0001. a-year in consequence of the preference given by its representatives to the fittest object presented to their choice.—Times. The meeting of Parliament, and the first de bate in the Reformed House of Commons, took place yesterday, and, if we cannot congra tulate the community on any manifest improve ment in the talent or temper of the discussion as compared with those to which we were ac customed in the unreformed Parliament, there is at least much ground of congratulation in the result of this important deliberation. The first Commoner of England is still to be a Gentle man, at least until some further progress be made in Reform, and a Gentleman so eminently. Tory in his habits, principles, and character, that, by the consent of all parties, he knows better than any other man in the House how the duties of the elevated station to which he is re elected, for the seventh time, ought to be dis charged, and deserves more than any other, the full confidence of all parties, that in his hands the arduous and important functions of his exalted office will be fulfilled with dig nity, vigour, and effect. The first duty of the Speaker of the House of Commons is to display perfect impartiality upon all occa sions. It is by this means only that hr can hope to secure the confidence and esteem of such an assembly, and to command the uniform and unanimous support of the House, whenever it may become (as in any House of Commons, however reformed, it will sometimes become) his duty to rebuke and to curb individual irregularity. The invariable impartiality of the present Speaker, his pre-eminence in this first quality of a Speaker, without which all other excellencies must he vain and nugatory, was attested by the strongest testimony, that of numerous unim peachable witnesses, who had themselves expe rienced the protection and other advantages resulting from this peculiar quality of the Right Honourable Gentleman, although they belonged to a party in the State engaged in unremiued hostility to that party to which the opinions, as sociations, and predilections of the Right Hon. Gentleman had made him a firm and conscien tious adherent. Mr. Hume, Mr. O'Connell, Mr, Cobbett, and the other distinguished Re formers who opposed the re-election of Mr. Manners Sutton, are_ not, however, much enamoured of the virtue of impartiality in the President of an Assembly in which they intend to be busy and active members. They insist, as upon a point of much greater importance, that the Speaker should have the merit of concur ring in hisgeneral opinions with the majority of the House, of which majority they flatter them selves they are to constitute a distinguished part. They put forward, almost without disguise, the pretension that idem sentire de republics, with Mr. Hume, Mr. O'Connell, and Mr. Cobbett, would constitute a higher claim to the Speaker's Chair than all the impartiality, all the urbanity, all the learning, and all the tact and experience which, during sixteen years, Mr. Manners Sutton has been enabled to display or to acquire. Surely they have been imprudent in this. They might as well have concealed from the world their exalted estimate of their own importance. They might as well have forborne to show to the world how incapable they are of being im partial, and how little they value impartiality when they think they have any chance of getting a little partiality in their own favour. They m i g h t as well have refrained from the tacit con fession that impartiality in his own character is not a Reformers virtue, and th a t i n t h e charac ter of a superior is not a Reformer's interest. The first subject of c ongratulation to the Con servatives in the proceedings of last night is the elevation of one of their body to the foremost place among the Commons of England, by the united acclamation of every Member of the House whose suffrage would not have been a positive disgrace. There is, however, another subject of congratulation to be found in this I discussion. We allude to the evidence, the unambiguous evidence, it afforded that a com plete extinguisher is about to be put in the new Parliament upon that very troublesome and mis chievous person, Mr. Joseph Hume. The Member for Middlesex, it is plain, will be re duced to less than nothing by a financier in his own line, but far more consistent and intelligible in his professions of economy; we mean Mr. W. Cobbett. The sneaking loan-jobber is an nihilated in the presence of the burly Republi can. Who will listen to the petty hypocrite who pretends to reduce the national expenditure to the English standard of 1792, when they can be entertained nightly by the bolder invader of the national establishments who proclaims that the cheap institutions of America are his model ? We like the man who will speak plainly out, and let the world know at once what it is he means, better a thousand times, than the artful destroyer who creeps by stealthy pace to his object, or who more probably has no higher object to stimulate him in his laborious delusions than that of promoting some dirty object of his own, getting beneficial slices of foreign loans with an indemnity against contin gent loss, and having his vanity regaled by the occasional " Hear, hear," of his shallow auditors. —Morning Post. The Reformed Parliament entered on its ex istence yesterday. From several articles in the Chronicle, our readers must have been prepared for the discussion which arose on the choice of a Speaker. Mr. Hume began the business of the night by a question whether it was the in tention of his Majesty's Ministers to bring in a Bill to alter the Act for granting an annuity to the late Speaker, which being objected to as ir regular, he proceeded to enter on the question of election of Speaker. Having given an outline of what he deemed the qualifications necessary to a Speaker, he admitted that Mr. Manners Sutton was well qualified in every ssnse but one—his opinions were diametrically opposite to those possessed by the majority of a Reformed House of Commons, and it was ne cessary that the opinions of the Speaker should be the opinions of the majority. He concluded with proposing Mr. Littleton, the Member for Staffordshire, as fully qualified from talents and long experience of the business of the House for the duty, and not objectionable on the score of his opinions. He glanced at what was after wards placed in bolder relief—the disposition of Ministers, which has been so often animadverted on, to carry on the government by the aid of persons hostile in opinion to them, rather than that of those who had always main tained the principles that placed themselves in office. Lord Morpeth proposed Mr. Manners Sutton, and Sir Francis Burdett seconded the motion. The Noble Lord the Hon. Baronet contended, that however well qualified Mr. Littleton might be, morally and intellectually, Mr. Manners Sutton had the advantage of greater experience. Neither of them met the objection, that it has hitherto been laid down that the Speaker should entertain the opinions of the majority of the House, that in .dl controversies with the Peers, and occasions when it should become necessary to give weight to the opinions of the majority, he might be found a fitting organ. Mr. O'Connell consi dered this " as another instance of that paltry truckling of the present Administration towards their ancient enemies, which had already afforded such frequent subjects of complaint. The public were much disappointed when they found them taking every opportunity of thrusting their enemies into places and offices of great power and importance. They should stand by their friends, and leave their enemies to shift for themselves. It was once said of one of our Monarchs, that he treated his enemies like friends, and his friends like enemies ; and it appeared as though the present Ministers were following that excellent example." He observed, that '6 it had been considered that the grand ad vantage of the Reform Bill was to put down Toryism in England, that vile and abominable system, which existed by the plunder of the people, and by the usurpation of their rights. No family had enjoyed the fruits of that system more than the family of the Right lion. Gentleman. They had possessed several rotten boroughs—they had numerous nominees in the House—and he should like to know of what use the Reform Bill would be, if Tories and Tory connections were still to be predomi nant ; and if the principles which directed old Parliaments were still to guide the Councils of the new." Mr. O'Connell then, by way of fur ther elucidating the motives of Ministers ob- served— " How far the placing a gentleman of Tory principles in that Chair was likely fo satisfy the public, might easily he anticipated. The people had been struggling almost to rebellion and revolution to get rid of the Tory faction, and now the Reformed House of Commons was about to take it up. The Ministry—the Reformed Ministry—had made the regular arrangements. They were, of course, afraid that the Right Honourable Gentleman would be proposed by the Tories. They sent the offer of the situ rtion, which, of course, was quite unexpected, and which, when offered, was politely accepted. And then . they went out of their way, not to promote a friend, but a political enemy. They were sure to get the votes of the Conservatives on the occasion to swell their numhers, and the newspapers of to-morrow would blazon forth the grand Ministerial majority ! The strength of Ministers would be promulgated on the Stock Exchange, and the Jews would rejoice in anticipation of a rise of two or three per cent.—(A laugh.) • • • • • 'A # He protested against this step, as an abandonment of re forming principles—as a relapse into Toryism—as a fol lowing up of one of the worst practices of the unreformed Parliament, that of the Ministerial party making their own arrangements, and their voting down the people by the aid of a Conservative majority.—(Hear.) He would venture to prophesy that was not the last time they would see that combination. Coming events cast their shadows before.' Reports had long been going about, that a junc tMn was going to be formed to put a stop to the progress of Reform, and to the amelioration of our institutions. Amelioration, did he say : he begged pardon. The Right Honourable Member for Lancashire had declared the Re form measure to be final ; and the Reform Member for Northamptonshire hail also pronounced a similar decree— (Lord Alihorp denied this.)" Already we have indications, that whatever combinations there may be, there will be no lack of men to denounce them. It remains to be seen, whether Ministers will or will not follow up their principles, by proposing such measures of amelioration as the country expects from them. It has often been said, and is repeated in an able article in the last Number of the Edinburgh Review, attributed to Mr. Macaulay, that a Whig in place does not differ from a Tory ; but we would fain hope the Honourable Member did not say this with reference to his colleagues, or that it must be taken as a mani festo. Mr. Tennyson stigmatised the negotia tion carried on respecting the Speakership as an insult to the House, and called on the Ministry for a disavowal, but declared his determination to vote for Mr. Manners Sutton on the ground of his high qualifications, while the Honourable Member for Staffordshire, with less experience, had not the advantage of representing the feel ings of the people; for he did nut think that he would vote for those measures which the people considered necessary to the efficiency of the Re form Bill. On this Lord Alchorp entered into an explanation of the motives which led him to open a negotiation with Mr. Manners Sutton. Believing him infinitely better qualified for the Chair than any untried person—when he found that he was again returned to the House, he avowed " that he did write to the Right Ho nourable Gentleman to know, if he were elected Speaker, whether he would undertake the office ; telling him that, if he would undertake to do so, he should have his support." His Lordship made the following important declaration on the subject of the course to be pursued by Ministers, and in explanation of what fell from him in Northamptonshire : " I hope and trust the measures which his Majesty's Ministers will being forward may be such as to meet the approbation of the House and the people. It is my in tention that they should do so ; and there is one sentiment in the speech of my Honourable Friend the Member for Middlesex in which I concur most completely ; nam4Y— that the Reform Bill was the means, and not the end.— (Hear, hear.) I have been taunted with having spoken of the Reform Bill as a final measure. I asked him what he meant by a final measure? Do I mean to say, because I used those words, that the Reform of Parliament itse'f is final—that no other Reform was to he introduced, and that no advantages whatever were to accrue from it? Cer tainly not. I considered it final, and I supported it as final as far as regarded the constitution of the House itself, and as a means by which to effect other improve ments and other reforms. The Hon. Member seems to think, because I made use of the word final, that I am opposed to those very reforms of which I consider the Re form Bill only the foundation." His Lordship had just before said, that "if we are now to talk of Ministers of the Crown dictating to a British House of Commons, I can only say, that we have wasted two years in talking , about Reform.—(Loud cheers.)" But is not this statement something at variance with the tone of his explanation ? It is for the Re formed House of Commons to determine whether, besides the advantages to accrue from the Reform Bill in effecting improvements, some improvement_ may not also be introduced into the mode of returning the Members of the House. Whether, when he said he considered the Reform Bill final as regarded the constitu tion of the House, he meant that there should be no change with respect to the mode of elec tion or duration of Parliament, is, to be sure, doubtful. But no present Parliament can hind any future Parliament, and as majorities decreed the Septennial Act and the Reform Bill, majo rities may in future decree other changes ; so that it is rather assuming too much to proclaim that Ministers deemed the Reform Bill final, even as regarded the constitution. A question arose as to the construction of the Act of Par liament conferring on Mr. Manners Sutton his pension. It was pointed out by Mr. O'Connell, that the pension having once commenced, must continue during the term of his natural life ; for the proviso in the Bth section, that one-half was to be forteitod if the Right Hon. Gentleman accepted any office under the Crown, did not apply to the Speakership, which was not an of fice under the Crown. It was observed by Mr. Corbett, that the pension being vested in him might be sold to-morrow. Mr. Manners Sut ton himself declared, that if he were chosen Speaker he would nut consent to take a shilling of the pension. With regard to the title to the pension, the Solicitor-General said he could not receive his pension of four thousand pounds while he was receiv ing his salary of 6,0001., as the Act only entitled him to the pension after his resignation ; but on a dissolution, while the functions of Speaker ceased for some purposes, they conti nued for others, for the purpose of receiving salary as Speaker, they continued until a new Speaker was elected. The Attorney-General observed, also, that it was impossible to contend that the old Parliament had entirely expired till within the last few hours. Another discussion may be expected on a point indicated by Mr. Warburton, that " the precedent of voting a pension to a Speaker before his retirement was decidedly bad, as it took away one of the gua rantees which the House possessed for his good conduct in the Chair ;" and "if no Member should be found on an early occasion to propose . _ that the vote be rescinded, he would hiMself submit a motion that all that part of the vote by which a retired pension of 4,0001. for his own life, and of 3,0001, for his son, be repealed." Mr. Cobbett's maiden speech was quite charac teristic. It will be looked to, no doubt, with much curiosity. No one expected that the division would exhibit a considerable minority. The dicussion, however, is of importance in se veral respects. In the minority of thirty-one who voted against the principle of placing a de cided and consistent Tory at the head of a Reformed Whig Parliament, there were only six Members of the last Parliament, viz.: Hume, Joseph ; Ewart, William ; O'Con nell, Daniel ; O'Connell, Maurice ; Strutt, Edward ; and Warburton, Henry, the Teller. Mr. Manners Sutton voted as a matter of etiquette for Mr. Littleton, whilst Mr. Littleton voted for Mr. Manners Sutton. We have already alluded to the doctrine of the At torney and Solicitor-General, that by the Act granting the annuity of 4,0001. to the Speaker, he was entitled to that sum from the day he should cease to hold the office of Speaker, and that by an Act of last Session the office of the old Speaker was to continue until the appoint ment of a new one. It was admitted by Mr. Manners Sutton, that he had drawn his salary of Speaker since the dissolution of Parliament. It is understood that some further inquiries will be made, with a view to ascertain how such an Act could have passed the late Parliament with out notice. We may observe, in conclusion, that as this is a Reformed Parliament, which must, of course, be anxious to allow the con stituency every facility for knowing its proceed ings, it might not be amiss that some measures were adopted for enabling correct divisions to be taken. The inaccurate manner in which they have hitherto been taken was anything but cre ditable to the House. Some improvement in this respect is especially called for.—Morning Chronicle. That Reformed Parliament, the meeting of which England has so anxiously desired to wit ness, met yesterday for the first time, and we cannot advert to the circumstance without re. joicing, in the first place, that the people have accomplished such a signal triumph over their enemies, and, in the second, expressing our hopes that the fruits of Reform will, in every respect, correspond to their ardent wishes, and the undeniable necessities of the country. There was but one novelty in the House—and that was the appearance of Mr. Cobbett—and but one matter of business, and that was the election of a Speaker, on which several Mem bers delivered their sentiments at length. It was previously known, that Ministers, for reasons the validity of which we shall not call in question, had determined to support Mr. Manners Sutton, as Speaker of the House, in preference to any other candidate; and it was equally well known that this selection was one which would be opposed by those Members who were of opinion that a reformed House of Commons should have a reformed Speaker, and not intrust either the conduct of its business, or the general expression of its wishes, to one who had uniformly opposed all Reform, and who, it might naturally be expected, would as steadily oppose the results of that Reform which has taken place. There was accordingly a much greater muster of Honourable Members than usually takes place on such occasions, and con siderable anxiety evinced to ascertain who would be selected as the opponent of Mr. Sutton. No time was lost in rendering this matter plain to every one; for the House had no sooner met than Mr. Hume rose to propose Mr. Littleton as a fit and proper person to fill the Chair of a Reformed House of Commons, and to denounce Mr. Sutton as unfit, not on account of any lack of talent or experience, but on account of the gross contrast which his poli tical principles presented to those of the majority of the Members of which the House is com posed. His motion was seconded by Mr. O'Connell in a powerful speech, and partially supported by Cobbett, in one of a rather rambling description : but which he delivered with consi derable ease and nonchalance. Lord Morpeth and Sir F. Burdett respectively moved and seconded the appointment of Mr. Sutton, on the ground of his great experience and impartiality—and of the necessity of that experience to a comparatively new House of Commons. It will be seen from the report of the proceedings of the House that their motion was successful ; there being, on a divi sion, 31 for Mr. Littleton, and 241 for Mr. Sutton. The latter of course was duly elected and regularly installed into his former office. Upon the subject of debate, our readers will of course form their own judgment. The public, by the ap pointment of Mr. Sutton,gains a saving of his pen sion of 4,0001. a year, as well as of the reversion that is tacked to it, and both of which will, no doubt, undergo modification, from the searching vigi lance of a Reformed House ; but, on the other hand, we perfectly agree with those Hon. Mem bers who supported Mr. Littleton, that such a saving is a mere drop in the bucket compared with the commission of a great error in prin ciple, or the destruction of the public confidence in its public servants. We wish, in fact, that the matter had turned out otherwise, and that with a Reformed House of Commons, we had also had a Reformed Speaker ; but we are not, in consequence, disposed to quarrel with the deci sion of his Majesty's Ministers. They no doubt had their reasons, and with them, also, is the responsibility. We trust that the former were g ood, and that in their decision they did not fail t o think of the latter.—Morning Advertiser. COURT OF CHANCERY, JAN. 29. ills LORDSHIP gave judgment to-day, in the following c ises, which have been argued in the course of the term. lIENDHAAI V. ROBINSON. In this case his Honour the Vice-Chancellor, in pursu anee of a rule he had adopted, had permitted the name of the present provisional assignee of the insolvent debtors to be substituted on motion for that of the late provisional assignee, in order to make him a party in the cause. This order, thus made, was appealed against, and his Lordship, in giving judgment, now said, that as there were 12 or 13 orders of the same description, he was very reluctant to alter what appeared to have been the practice of the Court. Oa referring, however, to the Insolvent Debtors Act, and to former decisions of the Rolls and the Exchequer, by which such proceedings were regulated, his Lordship was clearly of opinion that the name of the provisional assignee coul I not be substituted by order, upon motion, and he, therefore, overruled his Honour's decision. HUMPHRAY V. RAY. Hii LORDSHIP, without entering into any explanation of the facts of t his case, overruled the appeal, with costs. ATTORNEY-GENERAL v. SMITHIES. This was an appeal from a decision of the Master of the Rolls on the subject of a charitable foundation at Colches ter. The facts have been frequently detailed. An in formation had been filed, stating that the master of the alms-houses law'. received a sum of money, the produce of a bargain between him and the Barrack Department, for the removal of certain barracks built on the Charity lands, and it also charged that the money so received was the property of the Charity, and prayed that the Master should be declared to hold it as Trustee for the Charity, and that a scheme might be drawn up for a more equitable apportionment of the property, which had increased very considerably since the time of James 1., when the Charity was founded, and the stipends of the six poor men who were on the foundation fixed by the Charter. The Master of the Rails decided that the Master of the Hospital must be held a Trustee of the money received for the barracks, and that it was the property of the Charity. With respect to the other portion of the prayer, he directed a reference to the Master to approve of a scheme. His Lottostire now decided in favour of the first pot tion of the order of the Court below with respect to the money, as he considered the land on which the buildings stood to be the property of the Charity ;and the money de rived from it by the management of the Master, to be also the property of the Charity. As to the second point, his Lordship unfortunately felt bound to differ from the Master of the Rolls ; as it was his opinion that the rents and profits of the Charity should be appropriated as here tofore ; and, according to the directions of the testator, the six poor men receiving their present allowance, and the remainder to the Master for the time being. ROLLS COURT, JAN. 29. OXENDON V. DUFAUR. In this case, which we reported at length yesterday, but which was not concluded when our reporter left the Court, his Honour gave judgment, to the effect that the plaintiff was entitled to the relief prayed by the bill, with the costs of the suit. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, J. 29. GILLETT V. LAWRENCE AND OTHERS. The plaintiff, who was stated on the part of the de fendants to be a quack doctor, had obtained from a Mr. Bole, now deceased, a warrant of attorney to confess and enter up judgment for 6671., and of this Mr. Bole, the defendants were the representatives, and they refused to pay the money, on the plea that the security had not been fairly obtained. The cause was tried at Salisbury, and it appeared in evidence, that Bole was an old man, labouring under a severe scorbutic complaint at the time when the plaintiff got first introduced to him, and undertook to cure him. It also appeared that the plaintiff had paid great attention to the deceased for a considerable time, and dressed the wounds in his face, &c. Evidence was also given of the execution of the warrant of attorney by the deceased, and of his knowing at the time «hat he was about, and of having expressed himself grateful to the plaintiff; and there was also evidence that the plaintiff had great influence over the mind of the deceased. The Jury gave their verdict for the defendant. A rule Nisi was applied for and granted, to set the verdict aside, and for a new trial, and against that rule cause was now shown.—Rule discharged. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, JAN. 29. CLEADO\V} V. ATKINS. Mr. Baron BAY LEY, in giving judgment in this case, stated that the question brought before the Court related to the admissibility of an indorsement made upon a bond, into which the oblige'. of that bond had entered. That indorsement explained the nature of the bond ; and the question was, whether it could be admitted for such a purpose ? It appeared from the facts of the case, that the indorsement contained an admission opposed to the in terest of the party making it, and that he was in a situa tion to know all the circumstances of the case. It was supposed that the rule which was applicable in cases of this kind, had been limited by him (Mr. Baron Bayley) in a judgment which he had given in the Court of King's Beach several years ago. That opinion was, however, erroneous. It was sufficient tha: the entry was made by a person cognizant of the facts, and that it was opposed to his entry; and if it fulfilled these two conditions, it might properly be received in evidence. The other Barons concurred. Rule for setting aside the trial, on the ground of the ad niisaibility of this evidence, discharged. INSOLVENT COURT, JAN. 29. JUDGMENT. The Rev. Heaton Champion de Crespiyny, son of the late Sir William de Crespigny, whose case was heard and reported on a former day, was this :day brought before the Court to be adjudicated upon. At the conclusion of the examination on the former day, the insolvent's case was adjourned, in order that certain abstracts of annuities granted by him on his livings at Stoke Thyle and Neatshead, in Northamptonshire, should be produced, together with his marriage settlement on Mrs. de Crespigny, on which he also raised a sum of money, and some further accounts connected with his pe cuniary affairs. After some observations between the Court anti the Learned Counsel for the insolvent, respecting the value of some trifling fixtures at the living at Stoke Doyle, which the latter hoped would not be required to be paid into Court, but which Mr. Commissioner Lkw insisted upon, the case, he observed, being no more entitled to lenity than that of any other person. The CIIIEF COMMISSIONER, with the concurrence of his Learned Colleague (Mr. Commissioner Law), could not but adjudgs him (the insolvent), under the discre tionary clause of the Act, to an imprisonment of, at least, six calendar months, from the date of filing his petition ; in addition to which, the insolvent will be bound to pay about 301. into Court before he can obtain his dis charge, to be applied towards liquidating the claims of his creditors. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MAN SI ON-H 0 USE. Yesterday Richard Coster, who has been engaged in such numerous bill transactions, was brought before the LORD MAYOR, under the following circumstances : Mr. Baynton, who stated himself to be a silk-merchant, produced a bill for 151., purporting to be the acceptance of a person of the name o' Mitchell. That bill was given to him for goods in May last by the prisoner, who said he was a partner in the house of Benvolie and Co., of Great St. Helens, ship-owners ; the prisoner, who had had dealings with him before, and paid money to him, was never known to him as Richard Coster until now that the bil was dishonoured, and Mr. Mitchell, whose name was on it, declared that it was a forgery ; witness could get no information from Coster as to the other persons whose names were on the bill, and only could learn that the house of Benvolie and Co. was now on the Continent ; the alleged acceptor was in Whitecross street Prison, and most positively denied that the acceptance was genuine. Coster—l can prove by twenty witnesses that the writ ing is his, although you say he denies it; but the fact is, I never gave it to this man. The Loan MAYOR wished to see those who were ready to swear that the writing was Mitchell's; but expressed his belief that Mr. Coster could produce nume rous witnesses to swear that or any thing else.—(A laugh.) A Sheriff's assistant stated that the writing was Mitchell's, whom he had frequently seen signing bail bonds and other documents. William Lewis, who said he was clerk to Benvolie and Co., stated the writing was Mitchell's, and that he (witness) it NV;;S who paid the bill away to the complainant. The LORD MAYOR—I'II not dismiss this case so easily. I'll have the evidence from Mitchell's own lips. Custer—lt is no evidence if Mitchell swears that it is not his writing. Many men would swear i❑ the same way to get rid of the responsibility. The Loma MAY You are wrong in your law, clever as you are. If he swears it is not his writing, I shall send the ease to a Jury, and let them decide upon the conflicting testimony. Coster—l entreat to be heard. All 1 ask for is common justice. This man owes me money, and I have a case against hint in the Exchequer. I call upon you, my Lord Mayor, to look at this matter without prejudice. If Mitchell swears the writing is not his I can produce num bers to prove that it is. The complainant and I have had a variety of transactions, and he knows me well, although he says he does not ; and this very morning he offered to sell me the hill for 41. 10s. The Complainant—Never—'tis false. I took the bill from you I positively swear, and I never offered to sell it. A female voice in the crowd- 7 Yes, to be sure you did. Benvolie and Co.'s clerk declared, that the statement of Coster as to the offer of sale of the bill was quite correct. Mr. Hobler, jun., who appeared for Coster, submitted that there was no case against his client to justify a remand. The LOAD MA YOR..—I certainly shall not allow a man who has done so much desperate mischief to slip through my hands. Coster—My Lord, you are prejudiced against me; you don't give me fair play—you won't hear what I have to say. The LORD MAYOR—Go on, speak as much as you please ; I shall listen to you. Coster—Then I say you have not the shadow of a case against me. This Mitchell is an old man—this is hi► writing ; I have witnesses here who are ready to swear to it ; and what would be the consequence of preferring the evidence of the acceptor himself, to such solid substantia I proof? Why, that men would deny their own writing to avoid paying their debts. The Loan MAroa—Oh, the❑ you expect that he will deny his writing? Coster—l can only judge from what I am told he has already said, and hive no other reason to suspect. him. But 1 see, my Lord, that you are deeply prejudiced against me. Complainant—Why, my Lord, Mr. Coster brought a Sheriff's officer to arrest me for 401., which I never knew anything of, and the party who swore to the debt was never to be found. _ Coster—l v had nothing to do with the arrest. I merely happened to be present when the Sheriff 'a officer came in. My Lord, you will be so good as not to allow the gentleman next you to ear-wig you. He's whispering you to my injury. The LORD MAYOR—You appear to be greatly alarmed about your reputation.—(Laughter.) I assure you the gentleman did not open his lips about you. I suppose you have no objection to let me know where the drawer lives ? Coster—ln Clement's Inn. The LORD MAYOR—Is Mr. Benvolie here ? Mr. Lewis—No; he is on the Continent. The Loan MAYOR—What sort of a gentleman is he ; and is his concern flourishing? Mr. Lewis—He is a foreigner, about forty years of age; and the concern is now closed. The Loan MAYOR-01), it's closed is it ? Well, I must send you back until to-morrow, i❑ justice to the public. Coster--I am very badly treated. There is no fair play here. I'd thank:you, Mr. Brown, (the Marshal) not to be whispering the Lord Mayor against me. The Loan MAYOR—There is another tribunal, Mr. Coster, to which it may be necessary to send you. Coster—l am glad there is another tribunal ; for, by such mcn as you, a man stands a chance of being com pletely sacrificed, if there was no appeal from your in. justice. QUEEN- S Q U A RE. WHOLESALE DIALERS IN TWOPENNY-POST LETTERS. —Yesterday two respectably attired men, who give their names Thomas Williams and Charles Johnson, were charged with forging the Twopenny Poet Office marks, and fraudulently obtaining from various persons sums of money thereby. The prisoners were remanded, Williams declaring that Johnson was innocent. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. -- Yesterday - a - gentleman entered the Office to complain that the driver of a cab, who also attended, was driving a horse in his vehicle which appeared to be quite lame, and altogether, from its miserable, small and weak appearance, unfit for the hard tasks imposed on cabriolet horses. Considering this to be a case of much cruelty, from the apparent sufferings of the animal, he thought it his duty to bring it under Magisterial notice. Well, said Mr. CONANT, to the defendant, what do you ee v r e a o, n ffis t se done,its h corns ay:i ur r say to the charge of having a lame horse in your ea goes brio!et ? Vy, the gemman's perfect mistaken, if he for to say as how that 'ere hanimal a'nt fit for virk. I ts werry true there's eummut rumrnish yen it valks, but that ere all goes off as soon as ever it gets varm. Vy it s a , good a creeter as ever vent in a cab ; and it barn's a fault as 1 nose on, except its blind and a little lameish. If your horse is lame, said Mr. CONANT, you ought not Vurship, it'll cut avay like a good 'un as it is. cutting,to d ,r r h i eved saideift defendant nadltiahoneutt defendant, w i a n s your all ow ecadanbd. to • d to get the horse's "corns cut,"and g promise not to brit g it out until the latneness had disappeared. yleenlatvteohnatlt: COALS.—The Marquis of LONDONDERRY and Lord DURHAM have both taken off is. per chaldron t their pits. We hope the public will have a propor tionate reduction in the price.—Lineobtshire Chronicle. MARKET INTELLIGENCE. LONDON MARKETS. (From the " London New Price Current" of yesterdaY') . 0 , SUGAR. —The Sugar Market had a languid and teresting appearance all last week, till towards Fr td t M when the request appeared to increase material'' , a n ' l c Market assumed more firmness ; the estimated sal" '' .l:4 2,400 hhds. and tea. ; no alteration in the prices cou'uoto stated. The stock of West India Sugar is 1300' 2°, 1'01 hhds. and trs., which is 4,953 less than last year. Lo stock of Mauritiu s i s 57,177 b a g s , being 2,108 more IPg last year. The delivery of West India Sugar is hhds. and trs., being 989 l e ss than last year. The — 0 1 1,; very of Mauritius is 7,816 bags, being 729 more tha n , f ht corresponding week of 1832. A great proportion ;00 Sugars have been withdrawn from sal., in the ant ieiPst ;o of higher prices, waiting the event of the slave quo, which is immediately to be agitated. The Sugar 111°10 must be stated at former prices, but nearly nominal. g the Refined INlark , t there was a small improvem ent k ft 's week, both in the demand and in the prices; the st°e Dif very small, and the buyers appear mere inclined t° ° al forward to purchase ; it is also to be remarked th4t , weather has become mild, we may early expect the Slit i , demand for export. This afternoon the Market vi a ' ° Ae' ' firm, particularly for the fine goods, which are rs- higherAST INDIA SUGARS — olasses 225. 6d. The Java Sugars i ,avn hsf E, sold rather higher ; Bengal and all otter East India Sub-- are firm at former prices. MAURITIUS SUGAR.—The prices of Mauritius Su 0 e 4 we noticed last Tuesday, gave way 6d. a is. P er t :i hi since which the Market has remained steady. TO public sale, 3,077 bags sold with briskness ls. P er higher ; good brown 50s. up to 50s. for fine yellow. 0 FOREIGN SUGAR.—In Foreign Sugars no sales O c t, ported. Average price of Sugar 11. Bs. 3d. per CI; ha COFFEE.—The Coffee Market since Tuesday 13 ,' t • t ' s remained very steady; the good descriptions of PI; Plantation Jamaica, and Dominica are more inquiry vet fur the home consumption of the country, and ar e firm; the unclean Demerara and Berbice have me t a llot sale. In Foreign or East I n dia th ere i s no alter s The public sales this day, 1,671 bags Havannah C° lfee t l part sold heavily, ord. to fine ord. 50s. a 565. 64 ' ; market still dull. Rum, BRANDY, AND HOLLANDS.—The Govee°73,l contract being made at such a low price (under 1 0 . B i sn i had an unfavourable effect upon the Market last week" e e , this day there appeared to be no improvement ; proof Jr wards nominally Is. 9d. ; there are more inquiries I .or . ie maica Rum for the home consumption. Brandy more demand, and large contracts of first marks 0 3 ' reported 4s. 41. and 4s. .sd. In Geneva there is °° teration. TALLow.—The Tallow Market has been rather dull and the quotations are a shade lower. bel Seicss.—There are more inquiries after Pimento, Jo the actual purchases are on the most limited scale. Pepper and other Spices these is no alteration. f t li INDIGO.—The East India Company's Sale of chests of Indi go , w hi c h commence d on th e 22d in stn si Ind ended this day.—The sale began with the C 00 1 133 ni , t he goods (1,680 chests), and were chiefly taken off b h o ld Shipping Houses. The private trade followed, a n '. t lO at same rates, the qu a ntity bo ug ht i n by the FroPri::ol being very small. The sale throughout went off verY e rs ile the orders for Germany were 1 irge, and the home t took a fair quantity. Good and tine, good mid., mid' g o d ord. Shipping Bengal, and good and fine and told' sc et; ord. Consumers sold at last sal e 's prices to 3d. I° b ll( Madras last sale's prices to 2d. lower. By P u i d, sale this day 25 chests E. I. Indigo 3s. Id. a 4 4 'd being about the same as the Company's sal e just fini sh f e a few of the last lots perhaps a little lower, 3 ches t ' export only Is. 7d. to 2s. 7d. RlCE.—Rice is dull, but no further reduction' s prices can be stated. SALTPETRE.—The latest sales of Saltpetre are 3 1 1 fraction at 32e,, and 12i- at 28s. a 28s. 6d. COTTON.—There have been few sales of Cotton, b ut advance we noticed last week has been fully mainte. COCIIINEAL.—On Friday, by public sale, 37 bag s chineal 6e. 6,1. a 7.. 6d. ; 37 bags Garhlings 4s. TURPENTINE —The next parcel expected is so l" arrive, at about quotations. Spirits are still in little der OlLS.—Oils are all firm. Olive Oils, from sea' are expected higher; few holders will sell without a ° , v Ince on present prices. Rape Oil is a s hade be t ,' consequence. Linseed Oil has advanced 20s. 10 owing to some extensive purchases made for export t°. 1 0 1 s York and Lisbon mark ts. Common and Spertn last week. COUNTRY CORN MARK Per Quarter. Boston Gainsborough Grantham, Grimsby Horncastte Lincoln Spilsby Stamford NORWICH, Jan. 26. Wheat (per qr.) 425. 565. 595. Beans (per qr.) Barley —.— 18s. 28s. 31s. Pease, oats 18,. 21s. 245. Flour, fine (per sack) 4" CAN FEB 13 U Itl, Jan. 26. Wheat, white--. 565. to 6''9. 01d—...... red 465. to 564. ..... Old. tv, Barley, Malting 30s. to 355. Grinding.. 045. !° Oats 17s. to 245. 01d... ......» ?S. `0 Beans 343 to 383. Old 279..` ,„ Pease 375. to 40s. Grey...—. 325. „" MANCHESTER, Jan. 26. fo' Wheat, per 701 b. Bs. 9d. to 9s. Od. Red Bs. 04. t ° 6 Barley, per 601 b 5 6 6 0 Oats 3 0 46 Beans, per Imperial quart er Pease, White, per Imperial bushel 5 0 46 Malt, per 6 Imperial bu s h e l s 4l 0 49 Flour, per Sack of 280Ih 45 0 EXETER AR K ETS —Jan 25. A 1 5 % Beef (score) Bs. od. 9s. 6d. Wheat (bushel) ...75.6 , * 4 Mutton (Ih.) 0 50 0 6 Barley 6 6 Veal and t amb—O 6 0 7 Oats 2 3 Pork 0 4 0 6 Beans 5 6 1 Geese (each) 0 0 5 6 Butter (111)..„.„..„...11 Ducks fcouu!e\-4 0 5 0 Eggs (12) 0 0 0 Fowls ...... 0 4 0 Potatoes (peck) „0 IRISH AIA DUBLIN MARKET NO' Wheat. s. to s. 48 57 53 67 42 58 44 52 46 GO 48 54 47 59 52 66 TS DURING THE IV' Barley. I Oats. s. to s. s. to s. 24 14 34 18 36 41 17 '25 24 311 14 22 25 33 12 1B 30 39 10 21 28 35 14 IS 30 36 21 23 26 31 16 24 2,159 Wheat, per barrel 20 stone 16 Bete 678 Barley l6 stone 3,373 Oats --. 12 stone 14,432 Cwt. Flour—. 9 stone 784 Oatmeal Sold to Bakers only. 11,916 Cwt. Flour -- Average price o Receipts of Flour, 12,: Sales of Do. 14, Quartern Loaf, RKETS. ITE.—FRIDAY, Jan. 25 From To A, A • 19 0 30 6 1 t 3 0 •-•:, 11! 12 6 14 0 1 4' 8 0 12 6 - 60 8 6 Wheat, per barrel 20 stone. s. d. a s.d. l Cork „Ill; 0 25 9 1 Limerick 123 4 27 4' Waterfordl22 0 25 0 Clonmel —125 0 27 4 Carlow —126 0 27 0 d.s.d. a s. d. 50 70 89' 140 62 —0 130 70 80 146 70 89 130 70 8:0 ; Beef, 1M per lb. Pork, per CWL 0 d. a d. d. a d. Cork 5 6 5 6 Limerick,,. 31 413/ 4 Waterford 3 6 3 5 Clonmel 31 451 64 Carlow- 4 51 0 0 7°, Cornki t i i li t 7 rl ,l 4e l l, 4: l l , ( rith esw _ leil r rl4en a r °l a ° t " t t iLd e : lj e su E s :S e( j , ' er, E sq. e!p.t o_N.erble, ttp Harris 'Met, E. q. a toNs__ H. to D() 1, 4 °1t of lif e. re k I P 2 2 0 t 140414 %- it..), Per in the tea t . Yem 1 , 1 1 a 18 2 11 I'l o a u s g f E c btlit 4 k t ; 4 t t.ease 9 fi AY AGr's vo N N°. . y a . rtc3. 4 td Gthe g r r ° YaRe • Fla " ° I nerd "d ' OUR ,HI; -AL 1 );tl 'eh a ,NEs tt, deb e te W h 't Yl wi IWards B y RQwia, ' ktrah, Cot, ( ti lt% Y a p~iet 44".. LIZ v ~-~. ic cln ~ q~ e t~ tt 0 111 I►ty sto lit the k A in 'tctt o e f 144 ger n , de 't6, aho _ N t t,,4&!n] .4lth h ttlatZ, 4tim ITurr,itu ! • 4w 1 14 : t ; . .... frt, 4 l3( h ,,. t Ekk' fe t i .... 74t 14, six '• i `p y~ te e. 4°C , 14 alrB a, 'titt ...... r t tt tabi .t 'Awe es holtiltt , ;tti' i ' i ",t ki r s ........ , r o l L be( ~,,,,, , 411 0 , , she kit rrt ) for ), 'Pti t Y ; it I . t er „ „ p c teul to Itti Zr ctait e :46:1: 4 i1 'Poo nc rY ig co 4. 1 4 4 , d ; 'tied I Ktli er ;Ntr e . 4 ;,*'111. a nd A'r e b Pared L 46 , 14. c 1 ay a" ,taildp vuliuN.-inere nave been lew sales 01 Uotron, .; 4 14 74, 4 ,, - -)Eigt advance we noticed last week has been fully maintairwet ,`'fl e ,"q other `"- lt () Age. COCHINEAL.-On Friday, by public sale, 37 bag . P 4 ,tx chineal 6s. 6,1. a 7.. 6d. ;37 bags Garhlings 4s. I d ' 0 1 00 cY, TURPENTINE -The next parcel expected is flo ld ' r , lii; t tit:: 'teed arrive, at about quotation'. Spirits are still in little de l lo 4 ..d poi OILS.-Oils are all firm. Olive Oils, from se lrc d , 1 tt1, 4 „ . _ are expected higher; few holders will sell without 3 ' 1 , 4 0 4 "" may v ince on present prices. Rape Oil is a shade bl o pl . ' COURT 11 1 - E] consequence. Linseed Oil has advanced 20s. 10 sel A Th, owing to some extensive purchases made for export t ° l ,o • 4 York and Lisbon mark ts. Common and Sperm ° I tb. THE ' , .cl At last week. ▪ 1 p Ilt v . • TRE mis 4v /t• et ; q' L "C ES i COUNTRY CORN MARKETS DURING THE . - t , % l e., 4 ' Wheat. ' Barley. Oats, j e V, .:11411,0111"..ltetrestit ----.- .--_.--- to iit , h Per Quarter. o• ' 11l ‘f Y , with B . to S. s. to S. s. to 5. .1 6 y , Il h „ Boston ...-............... - 48 -. 24 - 14 %.' , 'i "t, rl tlrds oi Gainsborough .......- - 57 - 34 - 18 „,, N Grantham ........--....... 53 67 36 41 17 '25 •,' 'A t , n Grimsby l2 58 24 30 14 2'2 tf., g 'I, T ., 7C, Horncastle--....- 41 52 25 33 12 18 4 " It. ." , land Lincoln Spilsby . 48 54 '2B 35 14 18 ?, 4 2 & F .; • ( 2, 1 ), ' 11 ,4 Stamford . 47 59 30 36 21 23 0 4 il) I S,' P o , ' u r tb Y0rk....----.... 52 66 26 31 16 '24 2..1,,,-- loitlll. -110Ster- ii„ m NORWICH, Jan. 26. r • 11, 1 : 4 e ‘Srah , , ........ ` 2l '. 2 0 ' U the r i ' Wheat (per qr.) - 425. 565. 595. I Beans (per qr.) , ....,, fatherland , Barley ---18 s. 2Bs. 31s. Pease, G y ~,, ? ' 1 a " oats -.....-- 18, 21s. 245. Flour, fine (per sack) 4 " h. kr , Of CANTER B U Iti , Jan. 26. to ',I No kit c0u14.1, Wheat, white........-.. 565. to Ws. -. 01d........... - 6 • i e .- oii tL T u ~,, -a E - red--- 465. to 56....,,,. Old- ---t• , - 0 0.': 44, , S ire 0 Barley, Malting -30 s. to 355. - Grinding.. , 2 45 .: 0 •r:ti Nle Oats .....---............- 17s. to '24s. ...... 01cL-„. 20 4 . ; 0 00' . K at i , o eff , ta res 38s. ....... Old---.. 2 75 . i,,,#' r4lii Ili, "tual Pease --.......--......„. 375. to 40s. ....... Grey- 3'2s. • 4t I, 4 -1. full $ 1 th e ',Pri„ „, MANCHESTER, Jan. 26. 8 5 ' t lis t .,,,S4Uo ti „ ,4 4. Wheat, per 701 b. Bs. 9d. to 9s. Od. Red Be. 0 4 . t° 5 0 t haV•ltit' ° ''s v i Barley, per 601 b .5 6 6 0 Oats 3 0 41 ii 11k...2 Is t , Warm] Beans, per Imperial quarter - owidead Witter p ease , White, per Imperial bushel 5 0 40 ; ft,,, i ,ti'fritte r Malt, per 6 Imperial bushels 4l 0 49 t'lo,l'lit. k ,:rary Flour, per Sack of 280Ib 45 0 ...... ..„--- - Pe 4 ' ll `4lo tt '1 teat and , EXETER MARKETS-Jan, 25. AIN CA i' l°4 to t Beef (score) Bs. Pd. 9s. 6d. Wheat (bushel) .-7s. 0.- 4 5 IN Ile, Mutton (Ib.) 051 0 6 Barley .......................4 , 6 , ‘..' 0 ' IT Veal and Lamb-0 60 7 Oats -9 '' (3 54 MO Pork _0 4 0 6 Beans -----5 1 1 0 , Geese (each) .---...4 0 5 6 Butter (1b.)...............1 0 0.1 tt ..,„ Ducks 'coini!e\-4 0 5 0 Eggs (12) --„--.0 0 k s ' 11/ , Fowls .-- ... 3 0 4 0 Potatoes (peck) „0 6 -4 10, zi • ‘-,. ---0...-_ E t , 41 °bilit il b tet.., _ Y a IRISH MARKETS. ti d, -s ' a Nto c k ( .15(it ilL -. tt, DUBLIN MARKET NOTE.-FRIDAY, Jan. 2.) , e rgyuly Olill "e C From To A:',6 t o tlld '' Otret, 2,159 Wheat, per barrel 20 stone 19 0 30 6 ..„.. t li,j,,, Nt. t ' t of p 16 Bete e , 14, kir .16 stone 12 3 - 0 10 A - °gem 678 Barley-......... l6 stone 12 6 14 0 8 ii. etpL Prod -en( 3,373 12 stone 8 0 12 6 1 4 d e ; Uc e on' 14,432 Cwt. F10ur.........- 9 stone 6 0 21 0 'l O ' N I. 41 4 i 1, -e4 oe 784 Oatmeal... . 8 stone 8 6 13 0 . Sold to Bakers only. 10 11,946 Cwt. Flour 14 0 21 0 )4 , gall, Average price of Wheat and Flour 41.. 8.1. per sac ~te, h 1 41 1 4 , Receipts of Flour, 12,378 I S F „ l „ ts !': is ---- , • from 18s. MI to iv. t to th,.`gal k ,. from 1 is. Od. t 0 tOs . tt,, l V, 44,04 f Sales of ''' Do. 14,432 "'" Thirds,...from 6e. 01 t° ' 0 4 "Al ' 0t t ii...... d •th t •'' PRICE OF BREAD. 4 1 toNAI e kt.. _...%.; 4 dr ' h itur e Quartern Loaf BWd. Half Quartern-cort, Wheat, Barley. Oats. Flour, l_ifitf l ' .'4' ;'l•4„ t.. N 4'. t . ......... t .. per barrel per barrel per barrel f .--- 03,114.„: 4 d, E 7 r. flt 20 stone. 16 stone. 14 stone. Ist. ....:;./;0u" , .. '' tl ( 1,01) .1 kt k,,TeTt; .. s.d.g s. d. s. d, as. d. s. d. as. d. s. d. as. d. s• 0 Oli felte4 g airu, - C0rk......, 16 0 25 911 6 15 0 7 0 8915 0 17 6 0 0 li'vo t . tlt IX. best at: Limerick 123 4 27 4 12 0 14 0 6 2 - 0 16 0 19 0 0 ~ 0 lik ki re t i ......... et Waterford i 22 0 25 010 0 13 0 7 0 8017 0 18 ot° 0 iRJ,SI 4 „: I X ft ',Z.... Clonmel .. 1 25 0 '27 413 0 14 6 7 0 8916 0 17 0 13 0 0 ,ettro h ,2 ~ . k Carlow .......126 0 27 012 0 13 0 7 0 8:6 20 6 21 _.---' 7%t I N` i !th . a i r ";:• . 0 1 Butt - ei - ' ' 4 14 lish • ... 1 " i Beef, Mutton, Pork, 4 0 ' tto e . "ed ...... , !per lb. per lb. per cwt. Ist. 2d. 3d. ... 5 „,,/ , C0 z ,,,5,,,. . dre„ -- - - d. a d. d. a d. S. d. a s. (I. s. d. s. el. S. (1. ' s ' 4 0 10..1 , 1t, 111 4 0 - ' thtt Cork --- 5 6 5 627 0 30 078074 0 64 0 -_,; 011.7 te''V:**•!.. Limerick- 31 11 31 434 0 35 0,76 0700 64 0 ~.." owy et ~f, 'able'; Waterford 3 6 3 533 0 35 0180 076074 0 "" Q itv''ttj4w, r tst i „: Clonmel - 3-1 451 6; 32 0 33 077070 0 - 1 ' t ,:i 0 idr i :tk l „ , ixl i , ... . Carlow- 4 51 0 0 0 0 0 086 (' 84 074 ( 2 i ttah ' , li ' O Y -"••• , tof ON ~,. Bla ss KILKENNY.-Butter 82s to 84s, per cwt. ; Wheat Z''''„et 41,,11e.,Y oi ... ..... per barrel ; Flour 20s. to 345. per bag; Oats 7s. to 8!• i ' t o o ,, , lt, t o 5, i i , ,,. got e . ,;; eel ; Barley 12s. to 13s. ; Beef 4d. to 54, per lb. ; 31'1 . hitt° 4 41 11 ti;;;,..'"' to sd. ; Potatoes 2d. per stone; Coals Is. 26. per cwt.' st ep ileed,,,qa o - - .. Pies 355. to 365. per cwt. ..,. li - :,%,: ... Pao . 'K t Z!., ... BIRTHS. ,4 h_n at° ~ e t t s o p . 4) ,,,, h _ _A t ~, t On the 2Sth inst. in Montague-square, the 1 idy of e irhi, , tl" t let4: l ,,lth Mills, Esq., of a daughter. f 've t . -,, t,;. 1 . .... '', On the 25th inst. at Paris, Mrs. Frederic Chfi:2 V'lRN4,44;i''' i.r, 'tid"l3ali eal daughter. i Silk tli f Yf. ' Is' tlt , I trn' MARRIED. ,rec? Ne a l'ell , it On the 29th inst. at Allhallows Barking, Tower-t,oi -1 1.,” , e John NI. Williams, of High-street, Whitechapel, to S 3 ' . - "ltlir: . C!!. , t - toed, daughter of Mr. Joseph Robinson, of Seething-lane. , 'ft *l Qic On the 29th inst. at Marylebone Church, the lie 'drawl 44 Robinson Welch, M.A., of Hailsham, Sussex, to Mar! , :y tth,, of Benjamin Bond, Esq., of Devonshire -place. ,ilea„ qN IN G' DIED. ~.. .5 1 164 li,! arid ',' the • li , • J.,, tel fop On the 27th inst. at Kilmarnock, North Britain, •„ t t, toe u , tot j, Barfoot, of the firm of Riddle, Barfoot, and Meyin' il T wall , psi noster-row. i f, his 4 0, " On the 27th inst. at Hampton Court, in the 76th Y e- fildigel ier l'al uat, cioi age, Mrs. Legh, relict of the late John Rowles Lel e te r 'to p,i Y; i, 1 " Ai Adlington-hall, Cheshire, and a sister of the late Sir A tt or 1, %, t button, Bart., of Arley, in the same county. 0 ~,,,tee , ~,,,,, s On the 26th inst. in the island of Guernsey, at t l a t o ,l., D' lllitt ei , ' 4 4 p: °, .4 1 ' age of 83, Catherine, relict of the late John Tupper, c ta so - 4 ~t 4ealias the Jurats of the Royal Court of that island. „ f ,i• °f, 'lii h • On the '27th, at the 'Vicarage, Kensington, aged f' 3 ,;,,, , I , l tt to e ) %tet tai : l 'l I'ott, Esq., eldest son of the late Percival Pott, P ' .. e fflllo, t 4 on i ;, ... Surgeon of St. Bartholomew's Hospital. C 8 It It j,, NAT I t tt On the 2-ith inst. at Leeds Castle, Kent, Ano°,, c0 0 r 0 ... ~,, er lee ; wife of the Rev. IL F. Wykeham Martin, in her 2 71 IP, "Poll n , Y di f , r ' On the 26th inst. in London, the Rev. BarnaT,,,Doattru„ „_ us 4 , Re r, M A., F. M.S., late Domestic Chaplain trans Royal 1 . 4 ,1: 5 , '' ~..._ 't , lt t h,_ N a i l , Duke of Sussex, and Rector of Chignall cum Mashu,',44,: v ver di 'ned „ J third son of the late Charles Hanbury, Esq., of flal,',oo'o*.elagt6 1 '10, 4 1 On the sth inst. at Walworth, in his 89th year, WI" 3 0‘ 1 ,114„, " 1 1 " 1 v sen., Esq., an old inhabitant of Gracechurch-street , ,,io 'I, "..• an d 1 4 years one of the Common Council for the Ward Of ' rep ared Within. „...4 ii iirel by ir. , 0 , Plkt, t a Y and s PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY MURDO Y 0 U ,' .1141 e: ° t 1 (10,, 41 ; 4 11., "I a u SUN OFFICE, 112, STRAND, LONDON. . 21 0 13 0 I 14 0 I 21 0 I 16 ,f Wheat and Hour 41,. 8.1. per sa°` „ ;ll , /78 intsts, from 18s. od. t° Seconds, from 1 ti. Oti. t° 1 09 '" Thirds,....„ from 69. Od. to • PRICE OF BREAD. I Half Qum rtern Barley. Oats. per barrel per barrel 16 stone. 14 stone. Flour, rer s. d. a 11 6 12C 100 130 112 0 s. d. as. d.ls• 0 150 176 „5 d. 0 16 0 19 II v 0 17 0 18 010 160 17 0 1 0 20 6 21 0 utton, per lb. Butfer• .st. 2d. s. d. a s. 270 300780740640 340 350,76 0700 64 0 330 350'80 0760 74 0 320 33 077 70 0— 1 ' 00 0 0 86 (' 84 0 74 KILKENNY.—Butter 823 to 84s. per cwt. ; Wheat per barrel ; Flour '2os. to 345. per bag ; Oats 7s. to ti, l rel ; Barley 12s. to 13s. ; B ee f 4d . to 54 . per lb.; I‘` to M. ; Potatoes 2d. per stone; Coals Is. 2d. per cwt. , Pigs 355. to 365. per cwt. BIRTHS. On the 23th inst. in Montague-square, the I idy of Mills, Esq., of a daughter. t, On the 25th inst. at Paris, Mrs. Frederic Char. daughter. MARRD. On the ' 2 9th inst. at Allhallows lE Barking, Tower- , ',,,P, John M. Willi ams, of High-street, Whi tec h ape l , t o Sa' daughter of Mr. Joseph Robinson, of Seething-lane. On the 29th inst. at Marylebone Church, the Ite st ",p‘ Robinson Welch, M.A., of Hailsham, Sussex, to MarY , of Benjamin Bond, Esq., of Devonshire-place. DIED. On the 27th inst. at Kilmarnock, North Britain, 14 , r i, firm • Barfoot, of the of Riddle, Barfoot, and Meyln ° ' roster-row. On the 27th inst. at Hampton Court, in the 76th Y' age, Mrs. Legh, relict of the late John Rowles Leg t tter Adlington-hall, Cheshire, and a sist(r of the late Sir 1' button, Bart., of Arley, in the same county. On the 26th inst. in the island of Guernsey, at th,e,4., age of 83, Catherine, relict of the late John Tupper, the Jurats of the Royal Court of that island. On the 27th, at the Vicarage, Kensington, aged Pott, Esq., eldest son of the late Percival Pott, Pt' Surgeon of St. Bartholomew's Hospital. On the 2,ith inst. at Leeds Castle, Kent, Anne wife of the Rev. R. F. Wykeham Martin, in her 27th On the 26th inst. in London, the Rev. Barnard M A., F. R.S., late Domestic Chaplain to"his Royal Duke of Sussex, and Rector of Chignall cum AlashlW, third son of the late Charles Hanbury, Esq., of Raise` . ' On the sth inst. at Walworth, in his 89th year, Wi lli' sen., Esq., an old inhabitant of Gracechurch-street , . years one of the Common Council for the Ward of Within. ? k r PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY MU RD O Y O v • Of SUN OFFICE, 112, STRAND, LONDON.