The Sun. — London, England, 1833-04-27 00:00:00

r . ) SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. The debate upon Mr. Attwood's motion has concluded at last ; and concluded by a majority against inquiry ! The numbers were for Mr. Attwood's motion 139, against it 331. So much for the sympathy of the House of Commons with the distresses of the people ! Whether the Tories will continue to abuse this reformed Par liament, merely because they can no longer ap point its - Members , we know not ; but cert a in we are that they ought to find, some consolation in seeing the new machine so ready to fall into the old track. If the Tories had made the r epresentatives of the people, as they used to make them, with their own hands, they could not possibly have manufactured a batch of Le gislators more ready to oppose inquiry, and keep matters in that convenient state of darkness which is most favourable to imposture, than the present House of Commons has proved. We are now to have no inquiry ! And why? Be cause Mr. Attwood, the Member who moved for inquiry, holds opinions as to the cur rency vvhich are not orthodox in the city of London. It would be just as reasonable to refuse inquiry because Mr. Attwood wore a white hat. The House was not obliged to pat on his hat or adopt his financial opinions. We allow that if a Committee were granted on his motion, Mr. Attwood would have endea voured to persuade the Committee to think with him as to the causes and the cure of our present difficulties. But what then ? Are we never to have inquiry until we can get a man to move for it in all of whose opinions we agree? Why the very meaning of inquiry, the very term itself, implies, not that the House has made up its mind to adopt any man's opinions, or to act upon any preconceived opinion of its own, but the reverse. The term implies investigation ; and if Mr. Attwood's opinions will not bear investigation, it is not the House that should object to encounter the consequences of such a process. At this late hour it would be absurd to attempt any thing like a review of the debate, but we cannot help noticing the various attempts which were made in the course of it to go as near a denial of the existence of distress as could be done without actual insult. Less distress than at other periods ! Then how comes it that our complaints are a hundred-fold ? Less distress ! Shall we trust to tables and calcula tions, or to the complaining voice of the nation ? Let every man tax his own individual experience, and say whether at any time he remembers to have heard so many complaints, or witnessed so many instances of suffering as at the present period ? Talk of exaggeration ! There may be exaggeration in language, and even in figures, with all their boasted exactness; but there is no exaggeration in the haggard looks of our hall. famishing artisans. How the reformed Parlia ment can answer this vote to itself we know not —but of this we are sure, that the people and the Parliament will not arrive speedily at the same opinion, if the latter should succeed in sa tisfying its own conscience upon the decision to which it has come.—Morning Herald of yes terday. A division took place this morning on Mr. Attwood's motion, when, as had been antici pated, a large majority voted against it, and in avour of Lord Althorp's amendment. Great as is our respect for the general opinions and the eminent abilities of the Hon. Mover, and of many who supported him on this occasion, we cannot but express our satisfaction at the decision pronounced by the House of Commons. It was necessary that a proposition of this descrip tion should be met in limine, and without any attempt at compromise. We find many, both in and out of the House, who advocate Mr. Attwood's opinions on the currency, contending that Lord Akhorp's amendment bore no relation whatever to the original motion, and that the House might, with perfect consistency, have affirmed both propositions. We cannot coincide in this view of the question ; for even putting out of sight for a moment the terms of the motion, which, however indirectly, still dis tinctly, refer the existing distress to the present monetary system, it is impossible to disconnect the proposal for a Committee of Inquiry from the avowed and well known opinions upon the subject of currency entertained by those gentlemen from whom the proposal proceeds. Those opinions, they do not disguise them, are favourable to a depreciation of the currency, with the conse quent fall of prices ; and their endeavours in the event of a Committee being granted, would of course have been directed to accomplish the de sired end. Hence the objectionable character of the proposed Committee, because it would have tended to effect by a circuitous route that object which might be attained with infinitely Less danger by a distinct le g isl a ti ve measure . Uncertainty in such a case is the greatest of all evils ; and it is difficult to calculate the embar rissment that would have resulted to the com mercial world from the doubt and suspense at tending the progress of the inquiry. In all re lations between debtor and creditor, the same mischievous uncertainty would have been pro duced; and a degree of injustice not perhaps contemplated by the supporters of the motion would have been inflicted upon all in the enjoy ment of fixed incomes. In the case of the smAli fundholder and landowner, more espe cially, an indefinite depreciation of the currency must prove a grievous injury. The imposition of a property tax would be at once a more di rect mode of relieving the country at large, and an infinitely preferable measure on the score of justice and humanity. Jy a return just made to the House of Commons, it appears that there are no less than 87,166 public annuitants I,vhose half-yearly dividends do not exceed 51. ; that there are 44,688 who receive between 51. and 101.; and 98,275 between 101. and 501. Thus there are upwards of 230,000 annuitants ;whose dividends, which are probably their main aupport, are under 1001. a year. A property tax would spare the pittances of sil these per sons, anti would be confined in its applica tion to the larger incomes ; but a depreciation of the currency would operate on all alike, the poorest as well as the wealthiest ; those who are now only able to sustain themselves would be ruined, and the principle of equity and humanity that has always directed the operation of a property tax would be entirely abandoned. The small landowner would be a sufferer to a similar extent. A property tax of fi ve or ten per cent., eve.ii if applied without allowing any exemptions, would have far less of injustice in it than a depreciation in the value of money, which might, in effect, p rove a tax of twenty per cent., or perhaps of a greater amount. The House sat to a late hour, and divided three times. The first division was on the original !,no tion, which was negatived by a majority of as, , 1 to 129. Lord Althorp's amendment then became the question before the House, and Mr. A ttwood moved as an amendment the simple appointment of a Committee of Inquiry into the clitress, without reference to the monetary system. This brought over sever a l M em b ers , b u t th e propbsfi lion was negatived by a majority of 271 agnst 134. Lord Althorn's amendment was thertyut to the vote, and carried by a majority of 304 to 49. So decided an expression of opinion of course sets the currency question at rest as far as the present Parliament is concerned.—Morn. Post of yesterday. The expediency of the ballot has been debated for the first time in a reformed House of Commons, and has, for the present, been decided in a manner with which we at least are perfectly satisfied. It has always been our idea that it was wise and politic, in the first instance, to disencumber the general qnestion of reform of all extraneous doubts and difficulties regarding the mode of voting, or the duration of Parliaments. If we have determined the qualification of the elector—if we have admitted whole classes, formerly excluded from voting, to the exercise of the elective franchise—if we have, in fact, provided an immense body of independent voters, instead of boroughmongering monopolies and close corporations, we were right to try the effect of so great an improvement without the in troduction of disputed novelties. The ballot, and annual or triennial elections, are precisely such changes as may be adopted at any future time, or at all times—as may be ingrafted on a good or on a bad system of constituency—as are so imper fectly settled in public opinion, and on which there seems so little present necessity for form ing any decided judgment, that we are glad of the respite from discussion which the 'great ma jority of Thursday night affords us. If it shall be Mound by experience that the Reform Bill has generally failed in producing the fruits of re form by returning, in any considerable number, to Parliament representatives who owe their seats to bribery or intimidation,—or if it shall be ascer tained that a House of Commons so returned is maintained in existence by the Crown, when it has ceased to express the sense of the peoph',—then it will be time to petition for an abridged duration of the present Parliament, and for new securities, in secret balloting, to guarantee the election of a better successor. Two short acts, of a few lines each, would then settle the matter, and introduce changes which, if pressed at the time of the Reform Bill, would have endangered the whole of that great fabric of improvement. The total absence of proof to establish the necessity for an immediate alteration of our system accounts for the apathy and indiffer ence with which the motion of Mr. Grote was viewed. We have so often and so fully discussed the question of the ballot, arid have found so little new in the arguments of its Parliamentary advo cates (able as we allow Mr. Grote's speech to be), that we deem it perfectly unnecessary to say one word more at present on the subject. Thfre pro bably could not have been a duller debate than that of Thursday, though it had related to the qua'lra ture of the circle, or to any of the disputed points of the Aristotelean logic. The example of America, so ignorantly referred to, has no appli cation to the mode of election in Great Britain, as Mr. Stuart, in the minute and graphic accounts of American elections con tained in his.- recently published travels, shows ' that the ballot is never resorted to in that country for the purposes of secrecy, and never prevents the most active canvassing on the part of the candidates and their friends. The work of Captain Murat re peats and confirms this statement, assuring us that each man, after the polling, boasts of the support which lie has given to his favourite candidate, and that a row as frequently distinguishes the termina tion of an American election in the western states as the progress of a fair in Ireland. When we say that we maintain our former opinions on the subject of the ballot, we have no desire to conceal or to undervalue the practical arguments in its favour de rived from the established bribery of Stafford, of Hertford, of Norwich, and several other boroughs, during the late general election ; but who would alter the electoral system of a whole country, and make an inroad on the settled habits of a whole people, in a doubtful attempt to elevate into honesty a class of burgesses long trained to habits of cor ruption, and against whom we have no remedy but in disfranchisement ? In such instances we see no necessity for a general application of the ballot ; we see only a proof that the Reform Bill, in retaining an overpowering majority of corrupt freemen, in stead of creating a respectable body of independent electors, did not go to the root of the evil, and that supplementary acts of a penal character must supply the defects or counteract the errors of the original measure. If, indeed, Parliament shall shrink from its duty, and fail to disfranchise those boroughs whose corruption is fully proved, the question of ballot will then assume a new form, and many of its present opponents will, no doubt, be among the first to affirm its propriety. But let us not act on the assumption that a reformed Parliament will, of course, disappoint the expectations of all just and reasonable men.—Timers. In the House of Commons Sir William Ingilby brought forward the resolution of which he had given notice—" That the duty on malt be reduced from 20s. and Bd. to 10s. the quarter;" and upon a division on this resolution, it was carried against the Ministers by a majority of ten, in a house con sisting of 314 Members—the numbers being 162 to 152. Lord Althorp, it will be seen, intimated his intention of carrying the resolution into effect, though it had passed in so thin a house and by so small a ma jority. Laid Althorp, however, observed that the de cision of the House had certainly placed his Majesty's Goverment in a situation of considerable embarrass ment. There can be no doubt that the vote of last night must entirely derange all the financial projects of the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Though Sir W. Ing,lby'a resolution reduces the duty en malt more than one half, yet as a reduction of duty gene rally leads to a corresponding increase of con ,ump ' timi, the loss to the revenue will not have that ex tent. Still, however, it will be very large, as will be seen from the amount of the produce of the malt duty for the last four years, which we sub join :- 1830 £3,814,304 18.31 1832 4,359,332 1833 4,825,128 But this is not the only loss of revenue with Which the Chancellor of the Exchequer is threatened. For instance, it is confidently expected that the House of Commons will agree to Sir John Key's motion for the repeal of the tax on houses and windows, and that tax amounted in the last year to 2,594,0001. We need hardly observe, that if the Members of he House of Commons pass votes which diminish ;he revenue by millions, they must, in common jus tice and consistency, grant the Chancellor of the Exchequer an equitable substitute; for, any imme diate reduction of expenditure (though much may be reduced) to the amount of so large a defalcation of revenue, is what no reasonable man cm expect, because it is what no Minister can effect. Let the Ministers come forward with some decided and equitable measure of taxation, and they may, we are convinced, safely depend upon the support of the House arid of the country.—Times. We yesterday recommended Ministers to forego for the present the house and window tax, and trust to reduction and the possible increase of taxes to cover the deficiency. When we suggested this, we never imagined that twenty-four boors would Not pass before a majority of the House of Corn mone should vate for a reduction in another tax, to an amount equal to the produce of the assessed taxes. We supposed that the assessed taxes would not be abandoned without a desperate struggle, and th tt nothing but the known determination of the householders to refuse paying them, would tiring Ministers to consent to abandon so large a portion of the taxes. We know indeed that the budget did not answer the expectations either of the country or Parliament; but we confess we did not anticipate that so tremendous a breach in• the revenue as was implied in Sir William Ingilby's motion of last eight svoutt; be carried by a majority of 162 to 132. The motion was for a reduction of the malt duty from 20s, Bd, to 10s, per quarter. The produce of the malt duty is 4,825,0004, so that this reduction, allowing for increased consumption, will leave little more than three millions. The Mi nistry have seventeen or eighteen millions clear, after paying the interest of the National Debt. It may be true, as was stated by one Hon. Member, :hat there are a number of overgrown salaries—that ►here are pensions and sinecures which ought to be abolished—that the Judges are overpaid—and that !he civil list may be reduced ; but ingenuity itself could hardly reduce the expenditure more than three millions. But if one day the inhabitants of London determine no longer to pay assessed taxes, and the next the malt duty is refused, we do not well see how Ministers can go on without imposing fresh taxes. Mr. Warburton shrewdly observed, that be fore he consented to repeal the duty on malt, he should like to see the Chancellor of the Exchequer possessed of the consent of the country gentlemen to a property tax, to which, at present, they refuse their assent. What, then, is to be done ? Mr. llar vey observed, " as a Reformed Parliament, they were no longer the servants, but the masters of the Ministers; and he must blame the Members for taking the law entirely from them. It was their duty to give only to the Exchequer what they thought right ; not to take every thing from the Government." Ministers could not contem plate that Members would expect them to perform im possibilities to carry on the government of the country without the means. We firmly believe that Ministers never expected that the House would vote this reduction. If they Lad been apprehensive of the result of the motion, they would have taken the trouble to have a full House. As it was, they evidently had taken no trouble, trusting that the House would, true to its votes of confidence in them, continue to go with them on this occasion. We have no doubt that no men would more regret. the consequences of their vote than many of the majority, were Ministers to adopt the very foolish resolution of throwing up their situations. The only Cabinet Ministers in the House last night, Lord Althorp, Lord J. Russell, Mr. Charles Grant, and Sir J. Graham, by their conduct, ra'her evinced a determination not to go on. They would not go into the Committee of Supply and take a vote for the ordnance, though it is understood that they wanted money. We cannot believe that more than fifty or sixty at most of the 162 who voted for the reduction of the:malt duty really wished to embar rass the Ministry. We are satisfied that upwards of one hundred of the number voted for the reduction, merely to oblige Ministers— (and, at the same time, furnish them with an ex cuse)—to reduce the establishments of the country, and to have recourse to a rigid economy. These men had not the slightest idea of compelling Minis ters to resign, and they would have stoutly resisted any attempt of any party to turn them out. It would therefore, in our opinion, be a very foolish resolution were Ministers to think of resigning. They have, we hear, threatened more than once to resign if left in a minority ; but though resignation in such a case mieht be very proper in an unreformed Parliament, when it was understood that i\linisters must com mand a majority, and not be commanded by a ma jority, the case is very different now. The number of independent Members in an unreformed Parlia ment was small, and a majority against Ministers, once obtained, became permanent. Ministers should consider the difference of circumstances, and not attach more importance to the vote titan the parties who voted attached to it. We are clearly of opinion that they should make much allowance for the cir cumstances in which many Members found them selves. It is not for them to throw discredit on the Parliament which is their own handywork. If they in a moment of pique adopt the resolution of resigning, they will share with the Members, only in a greater degree, the responsibility of the confusion in which they may place the country. We therefore call on Ministers to adopt a manly and determined course on the pre sent occasion. Let them meet the wishes of the country, and say distinctly what they can, and what they cannot do, in the way of reduction.—" Nemo tenetur ad impossibile." The country will not tole rate spoliation under the mask of reduction. Let them fairly meet Parliament, and they will be sup ported by their friends. We repeat it, the country is not so impatient of taxation as to wish to throw things into confusion. Spoliation or confiscation will not be endured. We have thought it necessary to say thus much, under the circumstances. We are sure we are only expressing the sense of the country on the occasion. We know not in what language to do justice to the conduct of Mr. Alex. Baring, who, on the night of the Budget, condemned Ministers for not grinding the people to the dust, in order to have a large surplus Sinking Fund, and voted last night for the repeal of the Malt Tax, But then he is a County Member, and the vote of last night will help him in his next election.— Morning Chronicle. The majority against Ministers on Sir Wiliam Ingilby's motion, if it do net break up the Ministry altogether—which we consider the most likely re sult—must compel them to a total change of system. It now stands on record, as a decision of the House of Commons, that they will not recognise the scale of expenditure recommended by his Majesty's Go vernment ;—at all events, that they will not support it at the expense of obnoxious taxes. The declara tion of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, which was tantamount to a st vindication of his Budget, was more than a House of Representatives responsible to the people could tolerate, seeing, as they must have seen, the impression which had gone abroad, a n d the disappointment which was so strongly felt and expressed. Should Ministers resolve to keep their places after a defeat which one of their own body acknowledges to be haught with embarrassment they must make up their minds to surrender other taxes upon the same principle. Now that their weakness is known there will be no lack of motions, we should think, in regard to economy and re trenchment. But, as we have already said, it ap pears to us most likely that they will take the hint, and retire in time, before any more signal defeat shall certify to them the fact, that they have lost the confidence of Parliament.—lVlorning Herald. DANGEROUS CARGO.--A very severe en counter took place a short time ago' betwixt one of our colonial schooners and a party of New Zealanders. It ap pears that this vessel, during her last trip to Sydney, had procured a number of native heads, and also brought up a chief with them. While the chief was on board the captain had occasion to overhaul his stock of beads, and they were all incautiously exposed to his companion. The chief caught a glimpse of them, anti recognised the heads of some of his own relatives. Ile said but little at the time; but when he returned to the islands he procured a party to revenge the insult given him. They immediately commenced firing upon the schooner, and a regular fire was kept up between both parties for some time, when the vessel weighed anchor and sheered off. It is more than probahle that if the schooner had not crowded ail sail the captain and crew would have been sacrificed, and an exchange of heads taken place. —Sydney Herald, Aug. 2. The late fluctuations in Bank Stock are a subject on which much attention is bestowed in the M on ey Market, and a suspicion has been very openly e xpressed twat they were produced by the specu lations of some member of the direction of the Bank, who has availed himself of his official knowledge o f the negotiations with the Government for a new Charter. We have received letters indicating the pet son on whom the imputation of such dishonour able practices ought to fall, and urging us strongly to the proof of his delinquency. There is nut, loiivever, any evidence of that sort to be obtained, and if such is really the case, the party has taken care so to conceal the trap• saction as almost to defy detection. The suspicion ne vertheless still exists, and has spread to 30 great an extent, that it is not unlikely to become a subject of inquiry in the Bank parlour, where a great majority must at all events he found of honourable men, who would be glad to expose and purify the directio❑ of any such unworthy member. There are instances of the kind on record, one of them not many years ago, but unfortunately detection can seldain take place unless the party, as in the case re ferred to, is unsuccessful in his speculations, and is unable t o ma k e good his losses. The character of the Bank direc tion ought, if possible, to be above suspicion..-- Times. MAJORITY AND MINORITY ON MR. ATTWOOD'S MOTION, FOR AN INQUIRY INTO THE STATE OF THE COUNTRY, WITH A VIEW OF AN ALTERATION IN THE MONETARY SYSTEM. MAJO RITY. Owen, Sir J. B.—Pembrokesh. Paget, F.—Beaumaris Palmer, General—Bath Patten, J. W.—North Lancash. Pechell, Sir S. J. B.—Widnsor Peel, Sir R.—Tamworth Pelham, Hon. C. E. W.—Lin colnshire, parts of Lindsey Pendarves, E. W. W.—West Cornwall Penkaze, General C.— ' Pepys, C.—Malton Peter, W.—Bodmin Philips, Mark—Manchester Phillpotts, J.—Gloucester Pinney, W.—Lyme Regis Plumptre, J. P.—East Kent Ponsonby, Hon. W. F. S.— Dorsetshire Potter, R.—Wigan Poulter, J. S.—Shaftesbury Price, Sir R.—Herefordshire Price, R.—New Radnor Pryme, G.—Cambridge Ramsbottom, J.—Windsor Ramsden, J. C.— Reid, Sir J. R.—Dover Ricardo, David—Stroud Rice, Right Hon. T. S.—Cam bridge Rider, T.—West Kent Ridley, Sir M. W.—Newcastle upon-Tyne Robarts, A. W.—Maidstone Robinson, G. R.—Worcester Roebuck, J. A.—Bath Rolfe, R. M.—Penrhyn Romilly, J.—Bridport Romilly, K—Ludlow Hooper, J. B.—Huntingdonshire Ross, C.—Northampton Rotch, B.—Knaresborough Rumbold, C. Ed.—Yarmouth Russell, Lord John—South De vonshire Russell, Lord—Tavistock Russell, Lord C. J. F.—Bedford shire Russell, W. C.—East Worces shire Russell, C.—Reading Ryle, J.—M accl field Sandon, Lord—Liverpool Scarlett, Sir J.—Norwich Scale, J. H.—Dartmouth Sebright, Sir J. S.—Hertfordsh. Sheppard, T.—Frome Simeon, Sir R.G.—lsleof Wight Skipwith, Sir G.—Warwicksh. Slaney, R. A.—Shrewsbury Smith, J. A.—Chichester Smith, J.—Buckinghamshire Smith, R. V.—Northampton Somerset, Lord G. C. R—Mon. mouthshire Span kie, Mr. Serg.—Finsbury Stanley, H. T.—Preston Staunton, Sir G.—South Hants Staveley, T. K.—Ripon Strickland, G —West Yorkshire Strutt, F.—Derby Stuart, Lord D. C.—Arundel Stuart, %V.—Bedfordshire Surrey, Earl of—West Sussex Talbot, J.—Athlone I'ancred, H. W.—Banbury Tayleur, W.—Bridgewater Thicknesse, R.—Wigan Thomson, Hon. C. P.—Man chester Throckmorton, R. G.—Berks Todd, J. Ruddell—Honiton Tooke, W.—Truro Tower, C. T.—Harwich Townley, R. G.—Cambridgesh. Tracy, C. H.—Tewkesbury Trelawney, W. L. S.—East Cornwall Trevor, Hon. G. R.—Caermar. thenshire Troubridge, Sir E.T.—Sandwich Tyrrell, Sir J. T.—North Essex Verney, Sir H.—Buckingham Vernon, G. H.—East Retford Villiers, Viscount—Honiton Vivian, J. H.—Swansea Walker, IL—Bury Walsh, Sir J. B.—Sudbury Walter, John—Berkshire Warburton, H.—Blidport Warm, A. J.—Hastings Waterpark, Lord—South Der byshire Wason, Rigby—lpswich Watson. R.—Canterbury Weyland, IL—Oxfordshire Whalley, Sir S.—Marylebone Whitbread, W. H.—Bedford Whitmore, W. W.—Wolver hampton Wigney, I. N.—Brighton Wilbraham,G.—South Cheshire Williams, W. A.—Monmouth. shire Williams, R.—Dorchester Williams, T. P.—Marlow Williamson, Sir H —NorthDur. ham Wilmot, Sir E. E.—North War wickshire Windham, W. H.—E. Norfolk Wood, M.—London Wynn, Sir W. W.—Denbigh shire Wynn, Right Hon. C. W. W.— M ontgomcryshire Yorke, C. P.—Cambridgeshire TELLERS. Duncannon, Vis.—Nottingham Wood, C.—Halitax SCOTLAND, ! I Abereromby, Right Hon. J.— 1 Edinburgh Balfour, J.—Haddingtonshire Bannerman A.—Aberd een Dalmeny, Lord—lnver keithing Dalrymple, Sir J. H.—lidin . buiglishire Elliot, Hon. G.—Roxburglisliire Ewing, James—Glasgow Fergusson, R. C.—Kirkeucl- bright Ferguson, R.—Dysart, &c. Grant, C.—lnverness-shire dope, Hon. Sir A.—Linlith gowshire Jeffrey:lit:Hon. F.—Edinburgh Johnston, A.—St. Andrews Kennedy, T. F.—Ayr, &c. Loch, J.—Wick, &c. Mackenzie, J. A. S.—Ross-shire Macleod, R.—Sutherlandshire Murray, J. A.—Leith Oliphant, Laurence—Perth Ormelie, Earl of—Perthshire Oswald, James—Glasgow Parnell, Sir H.—Dundee Thorpe, General—Dumfries, &c Stewart, :Sir M. S.—Renfrewsk. Stewart, E.—Wigton, &c. Stewart, R.—Haddington, &c. Fraill, G.—Orkney Wemyss, J.—Fifeshire ENGLAND. Adams, E. H.—Carmarthensh. Althorp, Viscount—South Nor thamptonshire Andover, Visc.—Malmesbury Apsley, Lord—Cirencester Ashley, Lord—Dorsetshire Ashley, H.—Dorchester Bankes, W. J.—Dorsetshire Baring, W. B.—Winchester Baring, F.—Thetford Baring, A.—North Essex Baring, F. T.—Portsmouth Barnett, C. J.—Maidstone Bayntun, S. A.—York Beauclerk, Aubrey Wm.—East Surrey Beaumont, T. W.—South Nor- thumberland Berkeley, G. C. F.—West Glou. cestershire Bernal, R.—Rochester Bewes, T.—Plymouth Biddulph, R.—Hereford Bish, T —Leominster Bolling, W.—Bolton-le-Moors Bowes, John—South Durham Br.gstock, W. P.—East Somer. sashire . Briscoe, J. 1.--East Surrey Brougham, W. —Southwark Buckingham, J. S.—Sheffield Buller, J. W.—Exeter Buller, E.—North Staffordshire Bußeel, J. C.—South Devon 13ulwer, E. L.—Lincoln Burdett, Sir F.—Westminster Buxton, T. F.—Weymouth Byng, Geo.—Middlesex Byng, Sir John—Wareham Caney, T.—Cricklade Campbell, Sir J.— Dudley Carter, J. B.—Portsmouth Cavendish, C. C.—East Sussex Cavendish, Lord—North Der byshire Cavendish, H. F. C.—Derby Chaplin, T.—Stamford Chaytor, W. It. C.—Durham Chaytor, Sir W.—Sunderland Chetwynd, Capt. W.—Stafford Chichester, J. P. B.—Barnstaple) Childers, J. W.—Cambridgeih. Clay, W —Tower Hamlets Clayton, Col.—Marlow Clive, Edward B.—Hereford Clive, R. H.—South Shropshire Cockerell, Sir C.—Evesham Codrington, Sir E.—Devonport CAlier, J.—Plymouth Conolly, E. M.—Donegal Cookes, T. H.—East Worces tershire Coble, Sir C.—Queen's Co. Crawley, S.—Bedford Dashwood, G. H.—Bucks Davenport, J.—Stoke-on-Trent Dawson, A. E.—South Leices tershire Denison, J. E.—South Notting hamshire Denison, W. J.—West Surrey Divett, E.—Exeter Donkin, Sir R. S.—Berwick Dundas, J. W.—Greenwich Dundas, Sir R. L.—Richmond Dundas, J. C.—Richmond Dykes, F. L. B.—Cockermouth Ebrington, Visc.—North Devon Egerton, W. T.—NorthCheshire Ellice, E.—Coventry Ellis, W.—Leicester Evans, W.—Leicester Ewart, W.—Liverpool Fenton, L.—Huddersfield Fenton, John—Rochdale Ferguson, ir R.—Nottingham Fielden, V. J.—Blackburn Fitzroy, Lord J.—Thetford Folkes, Sir W.—Norfolk Fordwich, Lord—Canterbury Forster, C. S.—Walsall Fort, J.—Clitheroe Fox, Sackville L.—Helleston Fox, Col. C. R.—Tavistock Gaskell, Daniel--Wakefield Gaskell, J. M.—Wenlock Glaclstone,W.E.—Newark-upon- - Trent Gordon, R.—Cricklade Gore, M.—Devizes Graham, Sir J.—East Cumber. land Grant, Right Hon.R.—Finsbury Greene, T. —Lancash ire Grey, C.—Chipping-Wycombe Grey, Sir G.—Devonport Grownow, Capt.—Statford Grosvenor, Lord R.—Chester Grote, Geo.—London Hall, Benjamin—Monmouth Handley, Wm. F.—Newark upon-Trent Handley, Benjamin—Boston Harcourt, G. G.—Oxfordshire Hawes, Benjamin—Lambeth Hawkins, J. H.—Newport, Isle) of Wight Heathcoat, J.—Tiverton Hill, M. D.—Kingston-on-Hull Hobhouse, Sir J.—Westminster Home, H. T.—Gloucester Hornby, E. G.—Warrington Home, Sir W. Marylebone Howard, F. G.—Morpelh Howard, P. H.—Carlisle Howick, Vise.—North North. timberland Hudson, T.—Evesham Hume, J.—Middlesex Humphery, John—Southwark Hurst, R. H.—Horsham Hutt, Wm.—Hull Hyett, W. H.—Stroud Hughes, Hughes—Oxford Ingham, R.—South Shields Inglis, Sir It. H.—Oxford Uni versity Jermyn, Earl—Bury, Suffolk Jerningham, H. V.—Pontefract Jervis, J.—Chester Johnstone, Sir J. V. B.—Scarbro Johnstone, Sir F.—Weymouth Jolliffe, Colonel—Petersfield Key, Sir J.—London King, E. B.—Warwick Labouchere, Henry—Taunton Lambton, H.—North Durham Lamont, 3. C.—Wells Langston, J. H.—Oxford Leech, J.—West Surrey Lefevre, C. S.—North Hants Lemon, Sir C.—West Cornwall Leonard, 'l'. B.—Maldon Leonard, S:r T.—South Essex Lennox, Lord J.—West Sussex Lennox, Lord A.—Chichester Lester, t 3. Lester—Poole Lloyd, J. H.—Stockport Locke, W.—Devizes Lopez, Sir R. F.--Westbury Lumley, Lord—North Notting hamshire Lushington, Dr.—Tower Haml. Lyall, G.—London Lygon, Hon. Colonel 11.—West, NVorcestershire Maberly, W. L.—Chatham Macaulay, T. B.—Leeds Madocks, J.—Denbig h Mangles, J.—Guildford Marjoribanks, S.—Hythe Marryatt, J.—Sandwich Marshall, J.—Leeds Martin, J.—Tewkesbury Mildmay, P. St. J.— Winch oster Milton, Viscount—North Nor thamptonshire Molesworth, Sir William—East Cornwall Molyneux, Lord—South Lanca shire Moreton, A. H.—West Glou cestershire Moreton, H. G. F.—Ea s t Glou. cestersh i re Morpeth, lAlL.West'Yorkshire Morrison, J.—lpswich Neeld, J.—Chippenham Newark, Visc.--East Retford Nicholl, J.—Cardiff Noel, Sir G. N.—Rutland North, F.—Hastings MINO: ENGLAND, Astley, Sir J. D.—North Wilt. shire Attwood, Thos.—Birmingham Bainbridge, E. T.—Taunton Barnard, E. J.—Greenwich Bell, M.—South Northumberld. Benett, J.—South Wiltshire Bentinek, Ld. G.—King's Lynn Berkeley, C. F —Cheltenham Bethel', It.—East Yorkshire Blackstone, W. S.—Wallingford Blake, Sir F.—Berwick Blandford, Marquis of—Wood- stock Brocklehurst, J.—Macclesfield Brodie, W. B.—New Sarum Bruce, Lord E.—Marlborough Bulkeley, Sir R. W.—Anglesea Burrell, Sir C.—Shoreham Calvert, N.—Hertfordshire Cayley, Sir G.—Scarborough Cayley, E. S.—North Yorkshire Chandos, Marquis of—Bucks Chapman, A.—Whitby Curteis, H. B.—East Sussex Curteis E. B.—Rye Dare, it. W. H.—South Essex Darlington, Earl of—South Shropshire Davies, 'l'. H.—Worcester Dick, ,Quintin—Maldoir Diftw'y L W.—GLlMOrgans)). Dugdale, W. S.—North War wickshire Dunconabe, MILL-W.—North Yorkshire Eastuor, Viscount—Reigate Fancourt, Major—Barnstaple Feßowes, H. A. W.—Andover Feßowes, N.—North Devon Fiehien, John—Oldham Finch, G,---Stamford Fitzroy, Lord C..—Bury St. Ed. Fremantle, Sir T.—Buckingham Godson, R. — Kidderminster Goring, H. D.—New Shoreham Greville, Sir J. C.—Warwick Grimston, Vise.—Hertfordshire Guest, J. J.—Mert:yr Tydvil Guise, Sir B.W.—East Glouces. tershire Halcomu, John—Dover Halford, Henry—South Leices tershire Handley, Henry—Lincolnshire parts of Kesteven Hamer, Sir J,—Shrewsbury IRELAND. Achseon,Lord—Co. of Annagh Belfast, Earl of—Antrim Co. Bellew, R. M.—Louth Browne, J.—Mayo Browne, D.—Mayo Chichester, Lord A.—Belfast Cole, Hon. Arthur—Enniskillen Evans, G.—Dublin Co. Ferguson, Sir It—Londonderry Ffrench, F.—Rosscommon Fitzgibbon, IL—Limerick Co. Grattan, J.—Co. of Wicklow Hill, Lord M.—Newry Howard, R.—Wicklow Co. Jones, T.—Londonderry Co. Kerry, Earl of—Caine Lamb, Hon. G.—llungarvon Lynch, A. H —Galway Macnamara, W. N.—Clare Co. Macnamara, F.—Ennis Martin, J.—Sligo O'Callaghan, C—Tipperary O'Dwyer, A. C.—Drogheda Ruthven, E. S.—Dublin Colonel—Kinsale `Tennant, J, E.—Belfast RITY. Hanmer, H.—Aylesbury Hardy, John—Bradford Harland, W. C.—Durham Henniker, Lord—East Sufiblk Hodges, 'l'. L.—East Kent Hoskins, K.—Herefordshire Hotham, Lord—Leominster i llouldswurth, T.—North Not tinghamshire _ Ingitriy, Sir W. A.—Parts of Lindsey, Lincolnshire Irton, Kenn, T. R.—Lewes Kerrison, Sir E—Eye Knatchbull, Sir E.—East Kent Langdale, Hon. C.—Beverley Langton, Wm. Gore—East So mersetshire Lee, J. L—Wells Lennox, Lord W.—King's Lynn Lincoln, Earl of—South Notts Lister, E. Cunliffe—Bradford Lowther, Viscoun t—WestCum. berland _ Lowther, Col.—Westmoreland Mandeville, Vise.—Hunting donshire Methuen, P —North Wiltshire Miller, Wm. H.—Newcastle- under-Lyme Mosley, Sir o.—North Stafford shire Norreys, Lord—Oxfordshire Ossulston, Lord—North North- timberland Palmer, C. F.—Reading Palmer, R—Berkshire Parker, J.—Shetlield Parker, Sit H.—West Suffolk Parrott, Jasper—Totness Pease, Joseph—South Durham Richards, J.—Knaresborough Rick ford, %V.—Aylesbury Santbrd, 'E. A.—. West comer- setsldre Scholefield, J.—Birmingham Shawe, It. N.—East Suffolk Stanley, E.—West Cumberland Stewart, John—Lymington Stormont, Lord—Norwich 'Talbot, C. R. M. —Glamorgan shire Tennyson, Right Hon. C.— Lambeth Townshenel, Ld. C.—Tamworth Tullamore, Lord—Penryn Turner, W.—Blackburn • Tynte, C. J. K.—W. Somerset C,—West Suffolk , Vincent, Sir F.—St. Albans Vyvyan, Sir R. R.—Bristol Watkins, J. L. V.—Brecon Williams, G.—Ashton Willoughby, Sir H. P.—New caatle-under-Lyne Wrottesley, Sir J.—South Staf fordshire Young, G. F.—Tynemouth Young, J —Cavan Fitzsimon, C.—Dublin Co. Fitzsimon, N.—King's Co. Hayes, Sir E.—Donegal Lalor, Patrick—Queen's Co. Lambert, H.—Wexford Co. Martin, T.—Galway Co. O'Connell, D.—Dublin City O'Connell, Charles—Kerry O Connell, Morgan—Meath O'Connell, John—Youghall Perceval, Colonel—Sligo Co. Roe, James-7.Cashel Rutfwen, Ed.—Kildare Talbot, T. H.—New Ross Vigors, N. A.—Carlow Walker, C. A.—Wexford TELLERS. Attwood, M.—Whitehaven Ross. H.—Montrose, &c. FAIRED OM . Cole, Lord—Fermanagh Cooper, E. J.—Sligo Co. Grant, F. W.—Elginshirc and Nairnshire Hardinge, Sir IL—Launceston Heneage, G. F.—Lincoln Keppel, Hon. a—East Norfolk May. well, H.—Cavan Tynte, C. K. K.—Bridgewater Welby, G. E.—Grantham SCOTLAND. Agnew, Sir A.—Wigionshire Arbuthnot, Gen.—Kincardine- shire Callender, J. H.—Argyllshire Dunlop, J.—Kilmarnock Ferguson, G.—Banffshire Gillon, W. D.—Falkirk, &c. Gordon, Capt. W.—Aberdeen. shire Hay, A. L.—Elgin, &c. Sinclair. G.—Caithness-shire Maxwell, John—Lanarkshire Maxwell, Sir John—Paisley IRELAND. Barron, P.—Waterford City Castlereagh, Vise.—Down Chapman, M. L.—Westmeath Christmas, W.—Waterford Finn, W. F.—Kilkenny Fitzgerald, Thomas—Louth The following Members, who did not vote with the Minority on the first division, voted in the minority of 154, to add to Lord Althorp's resolution " that it is expedient to lower the standard of value," these words :—" That a Select Committeebe appointed which, having regard to this opinion, shall inquire into the general distress existing among the industrious classes of the community, and into Adams, E. H. Bcauclerc, Major A. Brigstock, W. P. Briggs, R. Briscoe, J. I. Bulwer, H. L. Ewing, J. Fenton, J. Fielder, W. Fort, J. Gaskell, D. Hall, B. Notwithstanding the large majority on Wednesday night, many friends of Ministers were absent—some from thinking that no division would take place —some from illness. Two of the Ministers, Lord Palmerston and Mr. Stanley, were ill. Sir George Philips and Mr. Fazakerly were absent, not thinking a division would take place. the most effectual means for its relief." Handley, Major Petre, Hon. E. Humphery, J. Rider, T. Hyett, W. H. Ross, H. Ingham, R. Ruthven, E. Jervis, J. Stanley, E. Jones, T. Stanley, T. B. Lennox, Lord J. G. Fayleure, W. M'Namara, W. N. Thompson, W. M'Namara, F. Prevor, Hon. G. R. O'Connell, M. Wason, R. O'Dwyer, A. C. Yelverton, Hon. W. FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZETTE. WAR-OFFICE, APRIL 26. 7th Regiment of Dragoon Guards—Cornet and Acting Adju tant H. J. Denny, from the Cavalry Depot at Maidstone (Rid. ing-master), to be Cornet, without pay; Assistant-Surgeon S. Barry, M.D., from the half-pay of the sth Royal Veteran Batta lion, to be Assistant-Surgeon, vice W. B. Ross, placed on half pay, dated April 26. . . Reghitent of Light bragoons—Captain W. T. Tinrie, from the 86th Regiment of Foot, to be Captain, vice Lyon, who exchanges ; Troop-Sergeant-Major J. Reilly to be Cornet, by purchase, vice Robins, who retires, April 26. 27th Regiment of" Foot—Captain 1). Macdonald, from the half-pay of the 42d Regiment, to be Captain, vice Freeman, who exchanges, receiving the difference, April 26. 59th Food—Ensign A. Macdonald, to be Lieutenant, without purchase, vice Peake, deceased, April II ; G. N. Heard, Gent., to be Ensign, vice Macdonald, April 26. 86th Foot—Captain W. Lyon, from the Bth Light Dragoons, to be Captain, vice Tinne, who exchanges, April 26. 89th toot—N. Cowley, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Poppleton, promoted, April 26. GARRISONS. Lieut. C. Walsh, from Sheerness, to — he Fort-Major at Dun cannon Fort, vice Austin, who exchanges; Lieut. T. Austin, from Duncannon Fort, to be Fort-Major at Sheerness, vice Walsh, who exchanges, April 26. MEMORANDA Assistant-Commissary-General John Renhall has been per mitted to resign his commission, April 26. The name of the t,entleman appointed to the 32d Foot, on the 18th of April, 1833,,is John E. Money, and not Murray, as stated in the Gazette of of the 19th April. The Date of Ensign Hart's promot on to a Lieutemn'y in 49th Foot, is 19th July 1832, and not 19th April 1833, as stated in the Gazette of the 19th inst. Assistant Commissary-General John Rendall has been rer mitted to resign his commission. WHITEHALL, APRIL '2O. The Lord Chancellor has appointed Samuel Field of Ded dington, in the county of Oxford, Gent, to be a Master Extra ordinary in the High Court of Chancery. WHITEHA LL, APRIL 23. The King has been pleased to direct letters patent to be passed under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, granting unto James Rock, Esq., the office of Rouge Dragon Pursuivant of Arms, vacant by the decease of Francis Townsend, Esq., late Rouge Dragon. WHITEHALL, APRIL 25, The Lord Chancellor has appointed Richard Rose. of Ayles bury, in the county of Buckingham, Gent., to be a Master Ex. traordinary in the High Court of Chancery. ADMIRALTY, APRIL 24. This day, in pursuance of his Majesty's pleasure, Charles Ed mund Nugent, Esq , Admiral of the Red, was promoted to the rank of Admiral of the Fleet. DECLARATIONS OF INSOLVENCY. JABEZ CLINTON PELHAM, wharfinger, Shad Thames, Horseleydown, SARAN COLEMAN, nurserywoman, Tottenham. BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED. DAVID GREENLEY, jun., victualler, Guswell-street. WILLIAM LANCE, victualler, Lewisham, Kent. BANKRUPTS. JOHN CR A WLEY, linen-draper, Oxford-street, to surrender May 7, and June 7, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Jones, Size-lane, 'THOMAS ARBER, builder, Plorseferry-road, May :3, and June 7, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Lane, Frith street, Soho. HOWELL NEWALL, jeweller, St. John's Wood-terrace, Portland-town, Middlesex, May 3, at half-past eleven, and June 7, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Low, Upper Gloucester-place, Regent's Park. JOSEPH SALON DIGAUD, jeweller, Goswell.street-road, May 3, at one, and June 7, at eleven, at the Court of Bank ruptcy. Brooking and Sure, Lombard-street. JOHN BRYAN COURTHOPE, painter, Regent-street, May 3, at twelve, and June 7, at ten, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Richardson and Talbot, Bedford-row. JOHN GILBERT, farmer, Colnbrook, Buckinghamshire, May 7, at one, and June 7, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Jervis, Queen-street, Cheapside. JOSEPH MILLINGEN jeweller, Wells-street, Hackney. road, May 3, at one, and June 7, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Spyer, Broad-street-buildings. HENRY NEWARK and JOHN TOMS, ribbon-manuf ac. turers, Wood-street, Cheapside, May 3, at twelve. and June 7, at eleven, at the Court of tiankruptcy. Fisher, Walbrook. DIVIDENDS. W. 1-Ushington, jun., merchant, Mark lane, May 17, at half past ten, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Harris, carpet-ware houseman, Leicester-square, May 20, at half.past twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Meyer and W. B. Meyer, merchants, Winchester-house, Old Broad-street, May 21, at half-past ten, at the Court of Bankruptcy—E. Elwell, ironfounder, Westbrom wich, Staffbrdshire, May 15, at twelve, at the Stone Bridge Inn, Stone Bridge, Warwickshire—J. Hirst, corn-factor, Leeds, May 17, at eleven, at the Court-house, Leeds—G. A. What", - inn keeper, Bocking, Essex, May 20, at twelve, at the White Hart Inn, Bocking CERTIFICATES, MAY 17. H. and C. Battersby, cotton-spinners ' Hindley, Lancashire— T. and 'l'. H. Ingram, fish-factors, Lower Thames-street—J. Cann, eating-house-keeper, Broad-street, Bloumsbury.square— J. W. Cohen, wholesale jeweller, Bury-street, St. Mary-axe— S. It. Fagg, builder, St. Andrew'shill—lt. George, coach-maker, Parker-street, Drury-lane—S. Hobday, snuffer-maker, Aston, Warwickshire. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. J. Scholes and J. Hardy, -- size-manufacturers, Manchester—J. Warmington and J. Devonshire, hide-salesmen, Church-lane, Whitechapel—T. and F. Clark, woollen-drapers, Bristol—W. Bracewell, J. Robertshaw, and T. Bland, grocers, Cullingworth, Yorkshire—A. Parry and C. Whitchurch, tinmen, Bristol— J. Carrick and Co., cotton-spinners, Carlisle (so far as regards It. Johnston)—A. F. Miller and J. Falconer, woollen-drapers, Colchester—J. Price and J. Grove, printing.ink-makers, Bir mingham—C. Collier and Son, hat-manufacturers--S. Knipe and W. Shackleton, wine.merchants .s:kipton Yorkshire—J. Prince and Co., coach proprietors, Bath-I'.Holmes and Co., coal. merchants, Southowram, Berkshire (so far as regards J. Hirst) —J. Barnes and It. Holmes, wholesale stay-manufactur ers , Charles-street, Hatton.garden!—J. Knaggs and A. S.iunders, bristle-merchants, Lawrence Pountney-lane—W, Flanagan and Co., Mansion House-street, florists. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, APRIL 25. THE KING V. THE HUNGEILFORD MARKET COMPANY. A rule .Nisi for a mandamus had been obtained by Mr. KELLY, on the part of a tenant on the estate of the above Company, to assess compensation for the non-renewal of his lease, which compensation was refused by the litter. Sir J. ScArtnEaT now showed cause against the :u'e. By Vie Act passed for the formation of the abive Com pany they were empowered to purchase the property re quired for the market upon granting full compensation to the landlord. Mr. Wise, the landlord of the house at present in question, bad let the premius to a person named Day, and in the lease there was a covenant not to assign without leave. Day subsequently assigned them, with leave, to the present tenant, who ntw clai , ned com pensation for good will on being required to leave by the Company. The Learned Counsel contended that the tenant could have no good will, inasmuch as there had been the covenant not to assign, and the term of the lease bad ex p:rel, so Clat the applicant was only a tenant at will. Mr. KELLY having been heard in support of the rule, The Couar decided that the 19th clause of the Act exteode I to persons who shoufd be put to any loss by such Act being pa4sed, and that the plaintiff might.be supposed, by the entry of the Company, to have been de prived or his reasonable expectation of a beneficial renewal of his lease. Rule made absolute. CRIMINAL INFORMATION. - .THE ICING V. JOHNSON AND ANOTHER. This was a case in whieli a Rule Nisi for a criminal information had liken obtained by Sir James Scarlett, at the instance of Lord Lorodale, for libels on that Noble man in the Whitehaven Herald, of which the defendays were the e ditor and printer. Mr. AIMSTRO)4 now applied to discharge the rule upon a technical ot , jecrion, which was, that the ptrticular lively were not set out in Lord Lonsda!e's affidavits. The COURT, after some discussion, overaule I the (b -iection. Mr. ARMSTRONG intimated that the defendants would not be able to show cause against the rule. Rule made absolute. By a bill lately passed by the Congress of the United States, Irish linens will be admitted to all parts of the Union free of duty, on and after the Ist Jan., 1834. MARKET INTECIAGENCg. LotiOoNnDNOewNEhpro'isrsin_ieAaeftd.RAoceKrutipnbrrEaTievne (From the t very 6~ oot SUGAR—The Sugar market has been week; the wholesale grocers and refiners, e 40 . stock, are earnest and rather extensive buyersTrdo purchase fer their immediate wants, in die ant' 1 . 7, de, better supply if not lower prices ; the estimated 1.4;411 week are 2,500 hhds. and trs. ; the late advanee__oo4l maintained, but in many instances a further iinl37_ lid. to Is. per cwt. has been obtained on the coloil Lions. In the refined market there is much firm n ess; ojul again a shade higher, brown lumps sold at 6D. Cod t_ 4 4 295. 6d, ; the rise in the prices of the latter seeras nor maintain the quotations of last week, ybefoenr 295. 6d., fi have nl been taken off rather more freely, but there s re 77; provement in prices to be noticed. At a late ho ur by the noon large purchases of refined are reported grocers for the home consumption of the count* _is V, since t this day MAURITIUS w e k SUGAR—The amount EAST INDIA SUGAR—There is no afteratio;oo India Sngars ; the sales are confined to Siam an d former prices. bags; r e e s, of Friday last was maintained. This day'sl 3l _, blic .„ls pet Mauritius went off heavily at a reduction of 6d • 7.. 91 1 FOREIGN SUGAR—The only sale of Foreigu. contract for 1,000 chests yellow Havannah, deliverable"- about 255. per cwt. toabou sa t f 0 P gi 'llastinweshsicd h 0 ,,, however,e. The t ht groceryhe: n r fir e n: d e: do fin e se gue u s ued e ' n 3 ::7 : quality l IrWt former(Ee nBe .n D tTx fd i e t e t i l w m e a e dln_NeHs leftt r ipt uo a vo r u e n l a ssi Adt h eh l l%m o el Molasses s 'Lod s e u.A s nS h t TSy a s been sold at 24 s• D u ' COFFEE—The Jamaica Coffee has in se ve r 04' sold lower, particularly the fine and very ord• p riCV however, to be noticed that no general reduction 4011 l be stated. The accounts from the continent csei more favourable for Coffee, and in consequence Pl it ifet now be made on such low terms as during the 10Pn have been offered and refused for low good le i s wo of ga Uriti l zi St. Domingo cannot be purchased at 555., and a : e d this evening at 555. 6d. ; of the latter some dain a r o tri and some class damaged Brazil 50s. and 515. S u d good ord. Ms. to 565., yellow 625. This day's P.; sois: generallyds o a yT d b S4 A. yLs Jamaica. i a R. m 5, ,a 7 my s . bags 131 casks and brls. British Plantation 0 1700 market prices ; 28 bags Mocha were taken in ; RUM, BRANDY, AND HOLLANDS—TI 4 L re IS h uti e rncu C he o a ff sve ee edrya m es a eh r na k sd e ied t el t or h wa i b s el aft re: b c e o T n p gu e creasing earnestness to effect sales, and in rcin but s.:01/ a further decline this afternoon. Geneva is va" -- , 4 ° publicOW B — ale Th 63 e 6 T c a as llo k w s 11,01farykeelltocwonctainndulese 700, 41s. 9d. a 435. 6d. Os• SALTPETRE—The prices of Saltpetre are ag g - e 6 ° Orli per cwt. higher. Rough 335. a 345., Company SPICES—In Spices there is little alteration.,, chew good Pimento 4 'Ad. a 4 sAd. a 4 About 1,7 ,0 have been sold since Friday last, which we nta- ° SOL§ 725. 6d. a 775. About 3,000 bags Pepper have u — A. heavy 3)4d. a 3 %cl., ordinary white 5 Md. a 5 It a iri* public sale about 800 chests Cassia Lignea sold sir e a f re th n e ov, l very good 70s. and 70s. 6d. very 5 01 ,1 ; COTTON—The Cotton Market remains prices firm. Egyptian Cottons are much inquired ;00 ensspt sale; el l re s m; Pil soe a ,ek several ait withdrawn itr d :d e l ro n a :ir ks : e rn : 3 1 : 1 1 b.:: : A INDIGO—There is no alteration in Indigo s'''",,,er placed at very full Market prices. OILS-6 0 Whale Oil, brown M., pale 221. 155., all sold• PRICE OF SUGAR. su gart i n ia Cr The Average Price of Brown or Muscovad o the._Spt, from the Returns made in the week ending egcln - April, 1833, is 255. 10!,'-d. per Hundred Weig h ' , the v - Duties of Customs paid or payable thereon on thereof into Great Britain. • 9l. FWass,enxbaDmitntoi PRICES OF' Hors.—Apra , 0 00 Kent Pockets 5l 12s. 1; h 6s. t ! 0 1, Sussex Ditto Seconds 0/, Os. JL' "co .„,v" 5/. 10s. Os.r 01. Os. 1, " Os. 01. Os rto„ 0 0 1 1 : . 0051:. ~,,°21./..10,08•Lt:111 Kent Bag !‘lissex Di Fssex Dit rincr; or OIL. ed 155 Rape Oil, brown Os. a l Linseed Oil lAnseed Oil Cake at the Mill, per thousand Rape Cake, per ton PRICE OF POTATOES.--Ap ril os• V el a Kidneys (York) 3l. 10s. to 41• ss.tiitt Scotch Reds - Marsh Champions Oxnobles and Shaves 2 2 31 k 1 11 0 5° : ::. . t tt o oo 3 11 ; el : ,„ WHITECHAPEL HAY MARIC.;-,;„ & j Straw. Clover 44. Od. to 28i. 4' LICATHSIt. ji Per l a b 'idel , English HOISe Spanish Ditto 19 Peril oP:400 Calf Skins". SO ;7,1810 Ditto 5 0 „ OVA Ditto 7.) `lOl9 - 1 9 Small Seals,, Gr Large ditto SKINS. 6s• Half-breds..... 4 8 , SOAP, Sze_.s;„y Yellow Soa Mottled P i , White Graves T, er ston , Le ... 122 p 2 cc' CA NpLES• e retaiishopii, is $ .4 ,0 i pti m atr o tto u l i e d Ns s r , o,rt pe h r:: iox. ~f ET.—April 26 1 f VI V I ; #Ol Walls End Ilidl;frolt' Walls End reL,',.'""ose.'„ Lambton's rOina irr:,, Walls End 14,`„,,,,5,, Walls End Ditbian ~,•• Walls End Lanier' W. E. Russel', fgel, Walls End Russel ', Walls End SlOa„,iicle•-on Walls End M".rirP," Walls End Stitteoo.:;7l, Walls E:d::: ,, , ii Walls End 11--! Cowpen 104 Howard'sSettl,to, Llangennecll v I i t market oar, ril 0$ WING ' PRICES OF Per lb. d. to d. Butts, English—........ 14r, 22 Oitto, 14 19 Dressing Hide 5...,...„, 12 15 Ditto l3 15 Ditto, light Crop Hides, light.... 12 12 to 601 b. 13 16i Ditto... .15 18 SHEEP Best Polled —....75. Od. to 10s. Od. Middling Polled 5 0 7 0 PRICE OF TALLOW Town Tallow 51s. 6d. Yellow 475. Od. White 4ss. (Id. Soap Ditto 44s. Od. Melted Stuff 375. Od. Ditto Rough 21s. Od. PRICE t)t , HAW I , Price of Tallow (as stated by th, The price of Store Candice, in th Cana ies, per doz. 7s. od. to Bs. Od. COAL MARK Per Ton, a. d. Adair's es w......nr0a 16 0 Chester Main...,—. 13 6 Dean's Primrose 14 6 Hebburn Main l6 0 Holywell 16 0 Kenton West 15 6 Ord's Reslhugh 13 6 ran field •••••• WNW. 18 0 Townley 15 9 13 6 West Hartley 16 6 Willington Walls End Blake 15 6 Walls End Bew 'eke & Co. 17 9 Walls End 14 6 D.tto Clarke and 14 9 Walls End Gosforth 17 9 Walls End Hilda 15 6 Ditto Killingworth 16 6 Ships arrived since coIINTRY CORN MARKETS DU5. 4 () . 1 ...'.75". Wheat. Barley. 0 /1 .. i• --_--- Per Quarter. a. to E. 8. 8. i. to 051 Blandford ................... 52 25 ''''. ° / 1 9 e Grigg . 52 60 36 40 Carnbridge........,........ 52 26 ~..A ' Chard .................., 43 54 24 28 a_ $ Huntingdon......—... 58 63 22 32 ;ft 50 58 20 30 i g t gl''' 4 5 1 Long 5utt0n............ 56 64 Louth ~,,.—......—. 50 55 27 32 Lynn — Newark _ , 42 61 22 32 ;-,-; „4 ,- -, Nottingham 54 62 24 32 '" ''' " P P l e y t i e n r o b t o i t r 1 1 u , g h... 7 50 48 64 60 30 23 34 33 ...... 0 /3 69 /5 j e l P0ntefract................ 67 4 3 03 P Sleaford ......—.....„ 65 70 36 38 t 26 Uppingham ............. 50 CO 22 34 -- ,0 4 Wi5bech........-..-„..... 50 58 20 3 3 - ii s PeO , , Al° . 4 0 ;0 LEEDS CORN MA RKE... -- ..'gfrto% Wheat, Norfolk and Suffblk, 601 b.. ................... ~.....1 York. and Lincoln. 601 b. ................... ev r:i.ri Barley, Norfolk and Suffolk , ... .................... .. -- Yorkshire and Lincolnshire .................... frlip.n d i Grinding . ....... . ......... ......................... ip _ . _ Aw4l • .A 10 1" 4>" to. ..... •• 91 0 ' toili .............. 9e l " tog" .......... •..• .... ......... - 0'74 Beans shelling Rapeseed, . .............................................. ........................................... Rapeseed, English, 231. to 24i Foreign, WilEAT l , l En 'E gl i i t s i h 't ,W M t; CORN White, ~ . ntlIV . „, a 0.00 u - ti - OATS, -Eng1i5h, ............ 1 g 1 per 710.:,,X1).C.H A .. ............ :• 9 ' 4 1 - --- Scotch, W R e e l d ch .. 2d.1ika..n.X.................• ,', i 1 - Irish, White . ' • •......... I 6 . Foreign ..... .. ''''''''''''''''''''''''''' .. '''' 1 4 5 W Re e d ls ''''''''''' '''''' Scotch,...''''''''''''''''''''' : '''' '' : 6 ' 0 / - Foreign .... ............................................. g t i , - "reign ........................ . ................... 0 0 i BARLEY, English, Malting, per imp. q uarter.. .. 1 9 Scotch and Irish, per 601bs. ........... • - 0 " I - Feeding .............................. .„ ..... 5 ,3 # BEANS, English, per Imperi . al quarter ............ aR 0 Irish. &c. .............................. 01 0 - Foreign ............... ''' ..................... 40 0 PEASE, English, per Imperial ...... ....... ........ 9B 0 Foreign ........... .. . ....................... 0 0 FLOUR, English, per 2501 b .. .............. . ........ . 58 ° .............. ,* JO 0 0 - Irish OATMEAL, English and Irish, . . i)er 'NOM . ......... '.,4 0 I INDIAN Coax, per 4401 b. ............................ . 0 .2 A .. Rye, per Imperial quarter .... ....................... 6O 10. , NIALT, per Imperial quarter ........................... Apr' IMPORT OF GRAIN for the ....... . gclk_t Wheal Oats. [Barley. I 'Wish , e''F'6 t Qrs. rs. Qrs. Foreign, Orls. spl 7,893 3,529 554 --.-f .111 Ei:o o ,,iinl n ltoi t te l fh i y e ae, l dl s a3 t . h thg l i nst., at Rotteßrdraßnif,lithSe lady ° fjarnes r jtl 4:l. til e ' WO ' On the 2 o l f d a in s s °l t enn . r , :t. at ' I:tle:telinaenv:, Geneve , the c lad 8 : v of oSfir i' Jolliffe, Bart., of a daughte r. 0 1/ 9 , MARR/ED. George .0 . ~ On the 23d inst., at St. James's Church. _ o r 4 ° , , Esq., to Dorothea Greenell, (West daughqr sii. Ite On the 23th inst., at Trinity Church, Chf Issviate - moor, Esq., to Emily, eldest daughter of I."' Kenneld, Rector of East llsley, ucks. On the 24th inst., at WySgetoo - Ve , gensiligtriC:f tPl chioness Dowager of Lansne. t t, S 4 , On the 25th inst., at tis bons!, in New-s..rj, $5 • ,i f the ! Hon. Anne Jane, wife of E. P. Oa" . 0 01 0 ' D..von, and only sister a Lord Rodney. tr . , On the `isth inst,. in Pornsoan-stree, ' ii Sommers. Y .----- 0 c 1 4°' PRINTED AND PUBLISHE D BY MU it I) • DO rie • SUN Omcr, 119, STBAN-, et (by order RkAu th e ht ruir eo t 111 '14 , Pei tiIQP AP.