The Sun. — London, England, 1833-07-17 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS The impression of most well informed persons seems to be that the Tories have decided against offering any effec tual opposition to the Irish Church Bill ; indeed, it is ob vious that any other course would lay them open to a charge of insanity. The Tory faction, as to any move ment directed to the overthrow of the existing Government, is in what is called a cleft stick. In case of success, they at once become Ministers, and then they find themselves in the unenviable condition of being unable either to con tinue the present Parliament or to convoke a new one. It is clear, therefore, if the Cunservativos have a spark of discretion left, what their policy will,—nay must, be. They will not by the same act unseat the Ministers and exasperate the English nation. But, on tte other hand,Lord Grey and his colleagues ought to let it be clearly announced that a single change in any leading feature of the effected by a Tory majority against the Government, will be the signal for their instantaneous resignation of office. We have already hinted at the feeling entertaired by all men of sense upon the occurrences of Monday evening, and that Lord Althorp sinned past forgive. ness, if, except on a full understanding with the Tory Lords, he flung away the shield provided for the Grey Cabinet by Sir John Wrottesley, in his motion for a call of the House. It was painful to see the old apo logy for Ministerial feebleness again resorted to by both the leading Members of the Cabinet in the House of Com mons. The motion of Sir John Wrottesley, forsooth, " embarrass the Ministers ;" it might be looked upon as " a menace to the Peers," &c. &c. Oh ! for one power ful determined mind, that would venture to call things by their right names, and to take " the bull by the horns." The Bill is already diluted enough, and watery enough, for the most delicate professor of church purifi cation and amendment, If Ministers acquiesce in any further concession, they at once defeat the main object of tbe Bill, which ought to be the spread of satisfaction throughout the country, and undermine the stability of their own power to rea/iza other great, diversified, and permanent reforms. We profess ourselves to be friends of the Ministry as long as they persevere in an upright and liberal course. We are sure that we can exhibit no more useful specimen of friendship than by urging them to pur ee.. with firmness and boldness the direct path of duty._ Timm Of the three Bills laid by the Chancellor on the table of the Lords on Friday last, the most important, perhaps, is that creating " a Chief Judge in Chancery" and "a Court of Appeal in Chancery." It is impossible to con ceive tribunals formed upon more opposite principles than the Courts of Chancery and the Courts of Common Law. Whilst every thing has been done to render the Judges of the Common Law Courts independent of political events, so that not even the demist of the Crown can vacate their seats, the principal Judge of the Court of Chancery holds his office durante bene placito ; and whilst, in the Common Law tr:hunale, such applications as are in the nature of appeals from the decision of an individual Judge are made to a Court consisting of four Judges, in the Court of Chancery the appeal lies from a single Judge to a single Judge. One object of the present Bill is to give to the Chancery suitor a Chief Judge, who, like the Judges presiding in the three other Courts of West minster Hall, shall continue in office quamdiu bene se vessertt—being only removeable on an address of both blouses of Parliament. This Judge will have an au thority to determine all matters now brought before the Lord Chancellor. The other object of the Bill is to create a Court of Appeal, consisting of the Lord Chancel lor, the Chief Judge in Chancery, the Lord Chief Baron, or Baron of the Exchequer (appointed to sit in Equity in t hat Court in the absence of the Chief Baron), the Master of the Rolls, and the Vice-Chancellor, or any three of them ; of whom, however, the Lord Chancellor or the Chief Judge in Chancery must be one. Before this Court will be brought the appeals from the decisions of the Master of the Rolls, and the Vice-Chancellor, which are now heard by the Chancellor sitting alone. Although this measure will afford but trifling relief to Lord Brougham, it will very much lighten the lat , ours of his successor, and who ought to he grateful for it, notwithstanding the vast diminution the disinterestedness of its author will have effected in the emoluments of the Chancellorship. We have heard that doubts are enter. tained of the success of this Bill, but it is not probable that it will be endangered by any event except a change in the Government. Whatever, however, may be its fate, it is satisfactory to the scientific jurist that we have one Legislator at least who, when he discovers the defects in the constitution of our Equity tribunals; at the same time perceives that they may be remedied, by simply assimilating them, in certain points, to the system of em Courts of Common Law, which has so long been consi dered as the model to be adopted by every people which has the benefit of free institutions."—Morning Chronicle, The case at the Marlborough-street Office against a polliceman, reported in our journal of yesterday, is not calculated to raise the new police force out of the public odium into which that body has fallen. If those who are appointed the guardians of the peace dare to outrage de cency—to wantoisly trespass upon the personal inviolability of unoffending British subjects, and, above all, to abuse the weakness of unprotected women, the sooner the trun cheon of abused authority is taken from their hands the batter. We never augured any good from the institution of the new police force, because it is in contravention of the constitutional principles on which the civil power of this free country had been conducted from time itnine modal. If the despotic power which has lately been introduced into this metropolis doss such things, as have lately occurred, in its infancy, what will it do in its ma tured strength, if ever it be allowed to realize, in the vigour of its growth, the intention of the Minister of the Crown ?—Morning Herald. The Conference of the affairs of Holland and Belgium met for the first time on Monday, but the Members were not in deliberation above half an hour. The pre et of the King of the Netherlands, we understand, was read to them, but no remark was made upon it by any individual prevent. Another meeting will take place to day, when it is expected the various clauses of the new projet will be discussed. It is stab d that at a previous inter view between M. Dedel and Lord Palmerston the latter expressed some dissatisfaction with the projet now about to be laid before the Conference, because it so closely resembled that which was rejected last year. M. Talleyrand and the other members of the Congress, have, on the contrary, expressed their general satisfaction with the various clauses of the projet. The fact is that the last projet was rejected principally on account of the high rate of tolls demanded on foreign vessels p casing up the Sebeldt. That rate has been since lowered by the Dutch Government, and consequently, although the pre sent proposals on the part of Holland are nearly the same as those forsnerly delivered, excepting as regards the rate of toll on the Scheldt, which has been altered to suit the views of foreign nations, there is no reason for the ob jections raised by Lord Palmerston on account of the similarity of the two projets The obnoxious clause has been altered, and that was all that was required. It is expected also that the duty on the transit of goods through Limburg will produce slime discussion in the Conference, not only upon the details rt feting to it but upon its prin ciple. This is not, however, expected to present any insurmountable obstacle to the final settlement of the treaty.—Morning Post. SUDDEN DEATH OF DR. TWEEDIE.— Yesterday an inquest WAS held at the Red Lion, King_ stu eat, Bloomsbury, on the body of Dr. TWF.EIDI r, aged 63. On Saturday night, Dr. TW ICEDIE hearing that the kitchen chimney of his house in Southampton -row was on tire, rau down stairs, and having procured two pails of water, with the assistance of another gentleman, extin guished it. The deceased then went up stairs, but had scarcely reached the landing when he fell down, at was heard to groan heavily. The two gentlemen immediately put him in a chair, but life appeared to have gone. In about two minutes Mr. KEELING, surgeon, Little Ormond street, arrived, and administered everything by which re-animation could be brought about, but without the desired effect,—Verdict, "Died by the visitation of Goo." On Saturday night or early on Sunday morn ing a sheep was fount in a field on Beechen Cliff, with its hind quarters cut off! These, the wretches who mutilated the poor animal in this barbarous manner, carried off, leaving the rest of the bleeding carcase. We should be disposed to think that there is no crime under heaven of which the miscreants who could do this would not be read") , capable. The sheep was the property of Mr. G. EAST, butcher, of New Westgate-buildings. —B a th Journal. The " rnanifestatio!i" has reached this price, and made its appearance in the person of one Mac Kay, a knight of the shuttle, apparently about 60 years of age, and who, since he was gifted on the loom, has worn his beard, which now has attained a goodly length, and, being half grey half black, cuts a very laughable appearance. His voice is on the extreme of sonorous, and having g strong Highland accent, it gives a loud hut uncertain sound, and like illawwortn, his " bleatings are beard afai off." He appears occasionaPy in the streets of the city. but holds forth generally in the suburbs, on Sundays, de claring that Antichrist is at the door, and that he himself is the Seventh trumpet, sent out to tout his approach. Phis bearded apostle, as be " manifests" himself, prov, , kes by his manne r and appearance, merely the laughter of hi, udience.--Aberdeen Jour nal. PARLIAMEMTARY PAPER. PRIVATE BANKS. RETURN of all JOINT STOCK BANKS in ENGLAND that have SUSPENDED PAYMENT, or have become BANKRUPT, to the present time ;—also, RETURN of all PRIVATE BANKS in ENGLAND that have SUSPENDED PAYMENT, or have become BANKRUPT, from 1824 to the present time ; distin guishing those situate within 65 Miles from LONDON from those beyond that distance. I have the honour to state, that there is no Return or Information in my Office, whereby I am enabled to state the nature of any Bank, whether it be one of Joint Stock or not; nor can I tell when any Banker has stopped payment, except as it is evidenced by the lodgment in this Office of Documents for the issuing of a Commission or Fiat in Bankruptcy. Subjoined is a List of Bankers against whom Dockets have been struck within the time specified, distinguishing where the Bankers lived within, and where beyond, 65 Miles from London ; and against all those Bankers Com missions or Fiats were issued, except in the case of Robert Stanton, Sir Claude Scott and Co., and William Watkins and Co. BANKERS LIVING WITHIN SIXTY-FIVE MILES OF LONDON, WITH THE DATE OF COMMISSION. Kinnear, John, Brighton Austen, Charles, Luton June 15. Loud, Thos., and Thos. Burgess, Sittingbourne Sept. 9. Burgesss, Thos , and Edwin Burgess, Maidstone Sept. 9. Marsh, William and Co., Berner's-street Fauntleroy, Henry, ditto. Oct. 29. Stanton, Thomas, Ludgate-hill Docket only. Watson, John, Partner with William Sikes and others, Mansion-house-street Oct. 3, 1823. Chambers, Abraham Henry, the elder, and Abra ham H. Chambe:s, the younger, Bond-street Nov. 19. Scott, Sir Claude, Bart., and Co., Holles-street Dec. 13. (Docket only.) Edmeads ' Robert, and Co., Maidstone Pole, Sir Peter, and Co., Bartholomew-lane Dec. 19. Stirling, Sir Walter, Bart., and Co., Strand Dec. 19. Sikes, W., H. Sikes,and T. Wilkinson, Mansion house-street Piper, Thomas, and Co., Dorking Crickett, Sarah, and Co. ' Chelmsford Dec. 24. Searle, James, and S. B. Searle, Saffron Walden Dec. 27. Sikes, W., H. Sikes, and T. Wilkinson, London Dec. 30. Joyner, John, and Co., Romford lan. 2, 1826. Hill, James, and Co., Cambridge Jan. 4. Hollick and Co., ditto Wakeford, Joseph, Wm. Wakeford, and Robert Wakeford, Andover March 11. Sparrow, James G.,and Co., Chelmsford March 27. Pike, Joseph, W.Florwill, and I'. Pike, Watford April 1. Bishop, Edward, Sheern ess May 23. Gordon, John, Spring Gardens Nov. 25. Jackson, W., (Partner with G. Jackson) Rochford Feb. 8, 1827. Stephenson, Rowland, and Co , Lombard-street Dec. 31, 1828. Stephenson, Henry, ditto Jan. 21, 1829. Lashman, Richard, John Lashman, and John Mugridge, Brighthelmstone Ditto Ditto April 10. Brooksbank, Henry, Pall Mall April 23. Lashman, Richard, John Lashman, and John Mugridge, Brighthelmstone May 14. Fry, William, Joseph Fry, and Jonathan Chap man, St. Mildred's-court Gray, John, Holloway Aug. 25, 1830. Sansom, Philip, and Thos. Rees, Lombard-street Mar. 12, 1831. Sansom, Philip, and Thos. Rees, Lombard-street May 2. Nlaberly, John, Bread-street Jan. 26, 1832. Duckett, Sir George, Bart., and Co., Pall Mall Mar. 22. BANKERS LIVING MORE THAN SIXTY-FIVE MILES FROM LONDON, WITH THE DATE DECOMMISSION Peirce, T., and David Willi a m s , M er th yr fid v il J an. 8 , 18 24. Threlfall, John, Liverpool Jan. 10. Holgate, George, and Thomas Holgate, Burnley May 5. Pomeroy, Roger, Brixham June 4. Raney, John, Whitehaven June 9. Withan, Robert, Halifax June Z. Prodgers, Giles, and Co., Ludlow Jan. 1, 1625. Gorham, Geo. Jas., and W. lnkersole, St. Neot's Feb. 26. King, Charles, Cranbrook Sept. 8. Square, John, Walter Prideaux, the younger, and W. W. Prideaux, Kingsbridge Oct. I. Shields, Thos. C., and H. I. Johns, Davenport Oct. 6. Johns, Henry Incledon, ditto Prideaux, Walter, and Co., Kingsbridge Oct. 6. Roberts, Sir Walter, Bart., Courtlands, Devon Oct. 21. Elford, Sir William, Bart., and Co., Plymouth Nov. 28. Osborn, George, and Co , Northampton Dec. 12. Dobson, John, and Co, Huddersfield Dec. 14. Jervis, Charles, Hinckley Sansome, Thomas, and John Blakesley ditto Dec. 14. Simpson, William, Thomas White, and Charles V. White, Peterborough Dec. 15. Watkins, William, and J. Brickwell, Daventry (Docket) Morton, Archibald, and Co., Wellingborough Dec. 16. Smith, William Wynne, and Co., Birmingham Dec. 17. Day, Thomas Starling, and Co., Northwich Gibbins, Joseph, and Co., Birmingham Dec. 19. Garrett, John, and Co., Hereford Dec. 19. Kellow, John, and Co., Southampton Dec. 19. Cavenagh, Nathaniel, and Co., Bath Dec. 21. Wentworth, Godfrey Wentworth, and Co.,York Dec. 21. Sparrow, Thomas, and W. Nickison, Newcastle under-Lyne Dec. 21. Messiter, Nathaniel, Frome Selwood Turner, John, Thos.Turner, and Robert Morris, Cheltenham Dec. 23. Hutchinson, Gee., and Co., Stockton-upon-Tees Dec. 24. Johnson, Edward, and Co., Whiteha ven May, John, and Co., Deal Dec. 24. Porter, Samuel, North Lopton, Norfolk Dec. 26. Simpson, William, Thomas White, and Charles V. White, Peterborough Dec. 28. Gibbins, Joseph, and Co., Swansea Dec. 29. Haynes, George, and Co., ditto Dec. 30. Ingelow, William, and Co., Boston Dec. 30. Smith, John, G. Moger, and T. Evans, Bath Dec 30. Moule, George, and:Frederick Moule, Melksharn Dec. 31. Brown, John, and Co., Ashburton Phillips, Nathaniel, Haverfordwest Dec. 7. Hartland, Nathaniel, and Co., Tewkesbury and Evesham Wentworth, G. W., and Co. ' York Dec. 10. Henning, Edmund, and C o .. Weymouth Haynes, George, and Co., Neath Dec. 19. Gotch, John Cooper, Kettering Dec. 23. Hadwell, Joseph, Liverpool Dec. 25, Baxter, John, Darlington Dec. 28. Williams, Thomas Walter, Northwich Dec. 28. Taylor, Joshua, Gomersal Dec. 31. Harvey, William, Lancaster Feb. 2. Broughton, Charles, and Co., Nantwich Feb. 13. Dilworth,John, and Co., Lancaster Feb. 13. Haynes, William Woodward, Neath Feb. 15. Eaton, Robert, Swansea Feb. 15. Hartland, Nathaniel, John Allis Maitland, and Nathaniel Maitland, the younger,Tewkesbury, Cheltenham, and Gloucester Feb. 15. Hartland, Nathaniel, and Co., ditto, ditto Feb. 13. Arthington, R. M., and R. Birkett, Lancaster, Feb. 18. Hague,John, T. Hague, and W. Allen (partners with W. Strickland), New Mahon (Docket) Feb. 22. Perring, Richard, Modbury Feb. 27. Smith, Thomas, and Joseph Locker, Whiston Eaves and Hanley March 4, 1825. Barry, William, Bruton March 4. Clapcott, William, and Co., Holdenhurst.. ...... Clapcott, William, and Arthur Quarterly, Hol denhurst and Christchurch March 7, 16211. Willday, Joseph, and Eleanor Willday, Ather_ stone Williams, Thomas Walter, Northwich Crewdson, Thomas, and Co, Manchester March 23. Call, George Isaac, Bognor March 27. Coleman, Thomas, and Co. Yarpole and Ludlow March 29. Coleman, Thomas, and Edward Wellings, ditto M a r c h 29. Wellings, Edward, Ludlow March 29. Coleman, Thomas, John Morris, John Beebee Morris, and Thomas M o rri s , Leominster March 30. Coleman, Thomas, Yarpole and Leominfter March 31. Morris, John, Leominster April 8. Clapcott, William, and Arthur Quarterly, Twyneham and Southampton Crewdson, Thomas, and John Robinson, Man chester Smith, Thomas, and Joseph Locker, Whiston Eaves and Hanley Saer, David, Benjamin 'Thomas and William, Mathias, Gellyhalog, Narberth, and Haver fordwest Jervis, Charles, Hinckley Smith, Thomas, and Joseph Locker, Whiston Eves and Hanley (new Commission) Pomeroy, Roger, Brixham Sept 29. Griffiths, Thomas, Bolton-en-le-Moors Nov. 11. Strickland, Arthur, John Hague, 1 homas Hague, and William Allen, New Maltma Feb. 6, 1827. Musgrave, John Clibsome, and Thomas Garrett, Wincan ton Turner F.clward, Warrington Badnall, Richard, leek Ditto, ditto June 7. Padzeller, Charles, and John Pasheller, Hunt ingdon Turner, Edward, Warrington Garrett, John, the elder, and John Garrett, the younger, Hereford Nov. 13. Ditto ditto Dec. 13. Hunter, John, Pershore F e b . 21, 182 S. Morris, Cheltenham March 29. Corser, George, George Naylor and Joseph Has sell, Whitchurch Johnston, Henry, Carlisle Sparks, Samuel, and Isaac Sparks, Crewkerne (Docket) Sparkes, Samuel, Crewkerne (Docket) klond, Thomas, Exeter Ditto ditto June 19. Yates, Charles, Stafford Deiken, Thomas, and Edward Bromby, Dray ton-in-Hale April 7. Payne, Daniel Beaumont, Henry Hope and George Albert Hope, Wells May 31, 1831 Tilsley, William, and Wythen Jones, Newton June 9. Bugg, John, Henry Bugg, the younger, and George Bugg, Spalding Timbrell, Thomas, Trowbridge June 22. Payne, Daniel Beaumont, and Henry Hope Wells (Docket) June 23. Hooper, John, the elder,and Edward Franklin, Westbury July 4. West, John, Frome Selwood July 7. Clarkson, Barnard, Selby. Schofield, John, and John Clough, Selby Oct. 27. Bell, James, Uttoxeter Nov. 8. Knight, Samuel, and James Knight, Mold Waters, John, Arthur Jones and David Jones,Carmarthen Jan. 24, 1832. Brooke, Samuel, the elder, Mirfield Aspinall, James, Liverpool June 7. Sikes, Stephen Garrick, Huddersfield Nov. 15. Young, James, Thomas Bracken, George Bal lard, James Charles Colebrook Sutherland, and Nathaniel Alexander, Calcutta June 7, 1833. INFLUENZA.—This widely-circulated epide mic has been extremely prevalent in Follies for upwards of a month past, and even now has but partially abated in extent of severity. Dr. BELL, one of the medical pi acti miners of the town, states that, since its commencement, he has treated nearly 300 cases, many of which were very alarming. Spitting of blood, accompanied with excessive vomiting, having seiz.d not a few, whilst inflammation of the lungs appeared in some of the country cases. It is hoped, however, that this distressing visiter may be soon banistied from our shores, to vegetate in a more genial Courier. ADJOURNED CORONER'S INQUEST, Yesterday afternoon at 2 o'clock, Mr. Baker, coroner, and the jury again assembled at the Wheatsheaf public house, Star-street, Lower Shadwell, to investigate the cir cumstances attending the death John Peacock Wood, a waterman, who died of the injuries he received while in the custody of the police on Thursday night last. Henry Hartley, a man of colour, stated that lie lived at No. 8, Angel-gardens, and was a mariner. On Friday morning, he thinks it was between 12 and 1 o'clock, he drank part of a quartern of gin with the deceased, at the White Hart, public house, Shadwell High-street. He had been there before, had gone away again, and returned. There was a woman named Ford, and witness's wire also there. Witness had also been entertaining them with his violin. Witness had drank a little, but not so as to affect him. Mary Ford, the deceased's companion, asked him to pay for a pint of ale. He disputed the payment on the ground that he had not ordered it. They had a few words about it. While they were talking loud a policeman, named Douglas came in. He came in atone, and laid hold of Mary Ford by the shoulders and put her out. Witness went between him and the girl, and told hitn she was not in the wrong, she only wanted Wood (the decease.l) to pay for a pint of ale, but he would not. With that he hid hold of me, and said I had no business with it, and shoved me. Witness was a little vexed at this. In the meantime he shoved the deceased out. Witness did not interfere; only looked on. CORONER —How did he shove him out? Witness— He shoved hint right out into the street. The witness did not resist. CORONER— Was more force used than necessary? Wit ness—l cannot say it was more than necessary, but he handled hins very roughly. I did not see Douglas strike him. I went directly to the door, and saw the deceased lying sprawling on his back on the pavement. His head was towards the middle of the street and his feet towards the door. His head was towards the edge of the curb. I did not see him fall. When I went to the door I saw several policemen about him, who told him to get up and go about his business. I then went back again into the house, and said I would not be ill used so; if I was re quired to go out I would go out. I don't know what became of the man after that. A Juror asked if the police did not always carry their staves in their pockets, and the Superintendent of the K division said they always dirt. He (witness) had been drinking with Douglas on Sunday morning. A Juror—On your oath, Sir,—now mind I have a witness to contradict, should you not state the truth— hare you not been drinking with some of the police since Sunday? Witness—No, I have not. A Juror—Have you had any conversation with any of the police since Sunday ? Witness—No, I have not; I only drank with Douglas, I did not talk to him. John Bennett, No. 21, Vinegar-lane, a baker, was next called—About 11 o'clock, it might be 12, it was past 11, and before 1, I am not posiive it was gone 12, the hour was latish, I was passing along Sbadwell High-street, when I saw the deceased coming out of the White Hart, and another man coming out after him. He ran as far as the Duke of York public-house, a distance of more than 40 yards, a good smart run, pursued by the policeman, and as soon as he came up with him he knocked him down. The man who pursued him was like a policeman, with a, stick in his hand. Some policemen came up, five or six in number, and took the man who was knocked down to the station-house. He did not fall down before he was struck. By the Jury—the blow was struck on the right side of the head. Ile only fell down twice. CORONER—I cannot see how this can be the man who is stated by the other witne'ses to have fallen directly he came out of the White Hart. By a Juror—The blow was so violent that the man was not able to get up again. Some of the Jury were inclined to believe there had been two affrays on Thursday night. By the CORONER.-4 heard some of the people who were around the man who received the blow say it was a shame, and it had killed him. I said it 'was a great shame, and they said, if I interfered in it, I should be taken away also.—( Hear, hear, front a Juryman.) By the Jury—The person who knocked down the man went with the police. He heard the people say the wounded man was a Waterman, and they called him, I believe, Jack Wood. A Juryman—This is important, the deceased was a Waterman. Matthew Crosby, of No. 85, New Gravel-lane, Shad well, next examined—Said that be some years back knew the deceased. On Thursday night last I was returning from the Folly-house, Blackwail ; and when I came to that end of the High -street next to Union -street, I saw three policemen carrying something, and when I was within three yards of them I heard a crush of something falling, and the first thing I saw was a man lying on the ground. There was only one policeman with him then, two of them having run back. I believe a row had taken place at the Duke of York or White Hart, which caused the policemen to leave the body. In about two or three minutes four or five policemen came back to where the man was lying, among whom was Fagan, the inspector, who gave orders for him to be taken down, meaning to the station-house. I saw one of the police men lift his bead up and let it drop again. The police man's hands were saturated with blood when he took his bands from his bead, and be told his comrades so. He was immediately taken up, and some of the police said, "It won't do old fellow; it won't do at all." He was pummelled about, and his head was hurt. A Juror—Then, when the policeman who had hold of his head let it drop, the feet were in the other police man's hands? Witness—Yes, and the others then let his feet go. The witness continued—The police might have carried the man whom he thus saw fall from forty to fifty yards between the first and second fall. He did not think that the policemen let toe man fall out of mere wantonness, but owing be supposed to au impression on his mind that there was a row at the Duke of York. The Foreman here complained that a note had been sent to Fagan, the inspector, putting him in possession of the evidence of the last witness. A Juryman protested against such conduct, and said that when he was called he would not hear his evidence. A warm discussion here ensued, in which the Foreman persisted tbat he had the information which he had state!, and he thought if it was correct that it would prevent Fagan's being examined. The Superintendent raid be would send for Fagan if the Jury wished. A Juryman—Oh no, a thief won't admit he has com mitted a robbery.—(Loud clapping of hands followed this, with some laughter.) The CORONER would have order in that court. He was the representative of his Majesty there, and if such in. decorous conduct was repeated, he would commit the first man to prison. It came out subsequently that Mr. Edmunds had de spatched a note to Fagan asking him if there was blood on the policeman's hands. James George James, of Queen street, in eie Hamlet of Ratcliff, was returning home between 12 and 1 o'clock on Friday morning, when he saw a policeman shove the deceased into the street from the door of the White Hart. He fell with great violence on his back, his head inclining towards the curb, but he could not say that his bead had either come in contact with the curb or the steps of the door. Four other policemen immediately afterwards came up and carried the deceased away, holding him by the head and arms. He could not say that the deceased was drunk. Ci , arles Henry Falconer, a Thames-police surveyor, attached to the Port Mallon, lying in the Thames, opposite before 2 Su o,, r . r k e tre ,c y k - s ,o e a on Friday u 10 t m 0 r ning minutes la or a s t,tv as quarter assing down Old Gravel-lane, on his way home, when his attention was attracted by several policemen standing together on the opposite side of the way, near the swivel bridge. He crossed the street to ascertain the cause thereof, and observed that they were searching a man's pockets, and he saw them abstract seven, eight, o r n i ne shillings ; but he was unable to state how they disposed of the money. The man who was being searched was in an upright position, to preserve which he was compelled to he propped up by the police. His head was inclined upon his cheek, so that witness was unable to distinguish bis features. He inquired who the man Was, when Douglas, police constable, No. 279, K, exclaimed, What ! don't you know Jack Wood ?" Witness replied, that he did perfectly well, and put his hand under his (the deceased's) chin, and raised his head, when, seeing that it was the person alluded to, he as k ed what they were going to do with him ? One of the policemen desired witness not to touch time deceased, as he was, he said, in a very filthy state, and as they had hired a man who was present to carry him to the station-house. They Passed witn se's house at the bottom of Johns on - street, when, seeing they were going to the station•hou,e as fa,t as possible with their prisoner, and that he was being treated very well, be event home and left them on their way. The deceased appeared to 'limn to be insensibly drunk, not knowing that he bad sustained any i n j ur i es. Foreman—What sort of a disposition was the deceased as you know so much about him, and have been ac quainted with him so long ? Falconer—He was a very harmless good-tempered man, so much so that if a little ' boy told him be would strike him, be would have run away. By the Jury—The deceased was a perfect drunkard. The CORONER suggested an adjournment of half an hour for the purpose of allowing himself and the jury to take some refreshments. They accordingly retired. On the jury re-assembling, Mr. Flower, of the firm of Harmer, Flower, Holt, and Sandell, solicitors, in Hatton garden, informed the Coroner and jury, that since the jury had separated he had been engaged by the friends of the deceased, who had been hitherto without legal assis tance, to w a tch the procee di ngs on the i r b e h al f . This intimation was received with applause. Mr. Flower having thus stated the object of his pre sence, was informed by the Coroner that he had better go home, as there were plenty of conservatives there to watch the proceedings. This produced a sensation in the room, during which Mr. Flower said he should most certainly rem tin.— (Hear, hear, hear, and stamping of feet ) There were persons arrayed on the o•her side, on the part of the persons suspected to have been accessory to the death of Wood, and his friends had on that account sent to him. Mr. Flower then called Ann Hartley, wife of the man of colour already examined. 0.1 the night in question her husband, the violin player, was at the White Hart public-house playing. Witness, Mary Ford, and another person were in the house. Douglas, the policeman, came in, on which Mrs. Perkins, the landlady of the house, observed to the deceased that he had not paid for a pint of half-and-shalf, on which the deceased observed he had. On this Douglas interfered, and deceased persisted he had paid for the liquor. Some high wends arose between them, and Douglas took tire deceased by the shoulders and shoved him with violence out of the house. Witness having seen the deceased pushed out, observed to her husband, " Harry, I'm sure that man is killed, but don't you go out." She further deposed that she considered the push deceased received was more than was necessary to put him out of the house. She did not go out to see the deceased ; but three policemen, of whom Dou glas was one, shortly after came in, and having ordered her husband to go out of the house, he (!per husband) said—" That before he would be pushed out in the man ner in which the deceased was, he would lose his life." He (her husband) then left the house. She heard no more of the deceased until (he next morning, when she heard that a man was kided in the n , ighbourhood of the White Hart on the preceding (Thursday) night, and her husband said to her that must have been the man who was last night pushed out of the White Hart. She after wards, in the course of Sunday, saw the deceased, and recognised him as the person whom she saw Douglas in the course of the night shove down the steps. By Mr. Flower—The deceased gave no provocation, or did any thing to justify the policeman in pushing him out of the house. CORONER-Was it through the door or out of the door ? A murmur of disapprobation arose from the jury on hearing this question, intermingled with cries of " No, no," " Too bad," " That's not right," " How could he be shoved through a door ?" Foreman—lt must be understood through the doorway she meant. Mrs. Ann Perkins, a widow, landlady of the White Hart, usually rang a bell at night to get her customers out, and on Thursday night she did so about half past I 1 o'clock. The deceased was then in the house. Douglas asked her if she wished the bar to be cleared out ; on which he took the deceased, who was two or three yards from the door, and put him out of the house, but did ❑ot use any violence in her presence. By the Jury__l never said to any person that I knew nothing of this affiir. I never said so to Deverell, the headhorough. He never asked me any questions about it. The Jury expressed a wi. , 11 to hear Deverell, and he was sworn. He sated that Mrs. Perkins told him, in the presence of the deceased's brother, that she knew nothing about the matter, and lie did not summon her to appear. There was a great sensation in the Cmrt at this stage of the proceedings. The Coroner said it was a pi'y there should be so much excitement about a circumstance that really amounted to nothing. It further appeared that he (Deverell) was instructed to summon Mrs. Pe:kins, by Sergeant Smith, of the police. (This produced a deep sensation in the room.) Charles Rubey, a man of colour, who described himself as an Englishman and coal whipper, sta'ed that he bad known the deceased, and having been himself in the station house, where he was on suspicion of being con cerned in a row, he saw him (the deceased) carried into the station house on the back of a coal-whipper. There were five or six policemen with hien, and having laid him down on the ground, they dragged him in towards a cell, with his head trailing on the ground. He saw one of the police afterwards enter the cell of the deceased with a pot of water, and thought he heard him sprinkle it on the deceased, hut be could not precisely say. Fagan discharged witness from the station-house. Francis Fagan, inspector of the K division of police, about a quarter before one on Friday morning, was in company with John Douglas, a police constable, No. 279, K, who has never had a report against him, and was the best man he had in his subdivision. I believe (said he) he is known to the inhabitants as the most peaceable and quiet man attac h ed to the police force. He is a discreet,.good tempered man, not at all hasty or violent. At the time mentioned I met him in Shadwell High. street, and he complained to me that he had lett his cab and his house unprotected in the street. At that time I Was opposite the White Hart, and heard a noise as of persons quarrelling, and, at the same time, beard a row in the Match-walk, I told him to go and see what was the matter in the White Hart, and I proceeded to tl.e corner of the Alatch-walk, and saw prostitutes quarrelling. 1 drove them into their houses, and returned into the High- Street, at the end of the Match-walk, nearly opposite the White Hart, and soon afterwards heard something very heavy fall. I looked to the left, and saw a man lying on the pavement on his back. I stood a minute or two, and seeing the man move, I went up to him. I had hardly got up to him, when the fiddler's wife and Douglas came out of the door, followed by Sergeant Patterson, N o. 9 , K. Douglas desired the woman to go across the stitraelpetine,a,nd said, "Go ab ou t y our b us i ness. " I f orgo t t o say th at H awkridge, a policeman, Na. 199, came up at the s ame t i me; I desired him and Patterson to arouse the deceased. They tried to do s o, but wi t h out e ff ect . Th ey who end e av oure d to d o so were Patterson, Hawkridge, and Douglas. 1 then put my hand to his wi ist and felt his pulse, and there was nothing more but what (night happen to a man in full health, or that was intoxi cated. 1 believe I desired them to take him to the station house and to send for a surgeon, which I usually do when 1 find a man in a state of stupor. It is the orders of the Commissioners to do se. I accompanied the men as far as Old GraVel-lane, and they (the policemen) carried him as carefully as a man could be carried. The next I heard of him was that he was dead. The Jury expressed a wish to see the charge as entered in the police book. It was as follows :—" John Woad found in Higb-stteet, Shadwell, and brought in by John Douglas, witness, No. 279 K division. At two o'clock was confined. 7s. were found on his person." There is in the book a remark by Fagan, " This man never aroused from his stupor, and died some time after he was removed from here." By Mr. Flower—l did receive a note from Edmunds while the evidence of Crosby was going on. Jury—Let us have the note produced. After a stormy discussion, the note was produced. It wets handed to the Coroner, and returned to Edmunds. The Jury wished to see it, but Edmunds would nut give it to them until he had a pledge that it should not he read publicly. After the Jury had indivi Wally read it, the Foreman declared it to be most irregular, and the Jury expressed their indignation. A Juryman said that Fagan had been put in possession of a very important fact by the sending of the note. A scene of the most indescribable confusion ensued while the note was being handed round to the Jury, who Put it to the Coroner whether it ought not to be read publicly. The CORONER said that, for private reasons, he should wish it not to be read ; the Jury were in possession of the contents, aria that was enough. Mr. Edmunds did not know that Pagan was to be examined.—(oh, oh.) Mr. Flower never heard of a inure shameful proce,ding. Sergeant Black of the K division was in charge of the station house on the night the deceased was brought in. He was ordered to discharge Rubey by Inspector Fagan. This produced a strong sensation, Fagan having stated positively in his evidence that lie had not discharged Ruhey. Rubey and Fagan were here confronted, and Rubey , persisted in his statement that Fagan had ordered him to be discharged. Fagan said lie might have ordered him to be discharged, but declared to God that lie did ❑ot recollect that he had. A Juryman remarked, that at this stage of the pro ceedings the inspector and sergeant had swor❑ that Rubev was discharged at two o'clock, while in the night charge book it was written down that he was not discharged until six o'clock. No dependence could really be placed on any thing said or done by the police. 'pie rest of the Jury were of opinion that there certainly must have been some foul play as regarded the entry made in this book, which could not be calculated to tneet the ends of justice. Here a Juror observed in addition that they were straightforward Englishmen, and he could not hut s that as regarded the book and other facts in the case, the whole of the proceedings appeared to him to have been shamefully managed. ConowEa—l n that observation, Gentlemen, I must say that as Jurymen I never saw anything in my life so irre gular and strange as your whole conduct throughout ail, inquiry. The Juror—And I must say, Mr. Coroner, that you, as Coroner in this inquiry, have acted, in putting your questions, in a most partial manner.—(Applause from the Jury.) The CORONER -The public can judge between us. The evidence of Harrison was then read over. Ht, swore most positively that the deceased was not dragged into the station house with his head trailing on the ground as sworn to by Rubey. The Jury said they did not credit the evidence of the police, there had been so much discrepancy. A Juror observed, that as there was so much excite ment arising between the Coroner and the Jury (he best course would be to adjourn. They bad now been thirte?•n hours engaged in the inquiry, and they were quite ex hausted. The CORONER said he had no objection, and at three o'clock this morning the inquest was adjourned until this day at three. During the investigation the greatest excitement pre vailed, but at the conclusion the Foreman said he hoped all unpleasant feeling would cease. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HO USE. FORGEB.Y.-... William Staters, a German, was charged with having committed a forgery upon the Bank of Eng land. The prisoner refused to give his name, but was identified by a former employer of his. He declared that his relations were so respectable that be could not bear the idea of degrading them by saying who he was. Mr. Palmer, a gentleman in the Cashier's Office in the Bank, deposed that he detected the forgery. It was in the name of Mr. Gibson, an official assignee. The writ ing did not correspond with the signature of that gentle man in the Bank book. Mr. Gibson, of Basinghall-street, official assignee, deposed that the prisoner, who was once in much higher circumstances, had been in his employment as clerk, and had only been discharged on the preceding day, on ac count of dishonesty. The writing in the order, which no doubt had been cut out of the order book in the office, resembled his writing very much, and was, he was con vinced, the prisoner's. The dividend was due to a Mr. Ogilby in Ireland, who had been written to from witness's office, but without avail, as that gentleman could not be found. The pri,oner, after the evidence of Mr. Gibson, said nothing in his defence, and was remanded for further l examination. REFUSAL OF A LARGE FARE BY AN OMNIBUS CON DUOTOR.—Mr. Cole, a medical gentleman, who resides in the Eogware-road, appeared at the Ju.tice room to ask the assistance of the LORD MAYOR under the fol lowing circumstance and hardship. The learned gentle man caused a great deal of merriment, which sprung in a great measure from the excellent temper with which he gave the history of his calamity. To a'l appearance the doctor was about thirty atone weight : " I am come, my Lord Mayor, to complain to you of unr a t h n e d dvreirvye s e a a i s d o n t a h t e d e d o c c o t ri o r r l . o c t t ! I r y e omnibus n conductor . road, and find it necessary to get into an omnibus to come to and return from town. However, the coachman and conductor, the moment I hail them, shake their heads and drive on, saying, No, no ; you won't do for us.'—(Great laughter.) They obj,ct to my size I suppose, but I am not exactly in a condition to remedy that; and therefore, if they have me at all, they mu't have me as I am."— (Laughter.) The Loan MAYOR--d am afraid, Doctor, that I cannot compel them to have you, and, to say the truth, I think their objection is a very reasonable one. Put the matter in this way :—An omnibus is licensed to carry fourteen persons. Now, suppose fourteen men of your size were to demand admission, how would you like to be a passen. ger ? Dr. Cole—Not by any means, I assure you, for I am convinced that we should not be at all comfortable in soeh weather as this. They proposA to me to pay double price, but I am only one person, and I thought that the Act of Parliament protected me. The LORD MAYOR—The drivers need not take any one they don't fancy. It was but the other day a drunken fellow wanted to force his way into an omnibus, and I fined him. Now I should think that the passengers would have as great objection to you as the driver ; and, therefore, until you reduce your weight you cannot expect accommodation from Paddington to the Bank for sixpence. —(Laughter.) Dr. Cole (casting his eyes round himself) —To reduce this bulk would be a difficult thing; it is impossible. The LORD tell you how. Walk. Dr, Cole—Walk ! walk fromlPaddington to the Bank !—(Loud laughter.) The Loan MAYOR That's a certain remedy for obesity. If D Joie! Lambert had carried the box in which he travelled, he would never have been such a spectacle. Dr. Ode—lt is not an easy matter for a man, upwards of fifty years of age, to walk any considerable distance. lam a medical man, and I would riot in such a case recommend violent walking. The LORD MAYOR—You mean you wouldn't practise it, Doctor?—(A laugh.) Dr. Cole—l am also aware of the usual method of reducing jockeys and fighting men, but I shouldn't fancy that system. I know the reduction of weight by such means is ruinous to the constitution, not to say a word of the inconvenient nature of the process to a man like me. The LORD MAYOR—I wish I could render you a service, Doctor ; you bear all these things, it appears to me, with an excellent temper. Dr. Cole—Certainly I do; I enjoy the refusal of the conductors as much as the passen gers do. The moment the door is open, the passengers cry out, " Oh, Lord ! we've no room here ; you must get an omnibus for yourself."—(Laughter.) The coach man cries, " I told you before, Jack, that we could not take in that load under double price ;" and the conductor slams the door and says, " All's right!" leaving me in the middle of the road in a roar of laughter.—(Great laughter.) The Loan MAYOR declared that he never saw so faith ful an illustration of the old saying, " Laugh and grow fat," and repeated Lis prescription of walking, but with out the slightest effect upon the Doctor, who disturbed the whole room in moving out of it. A young woman of interesting appearance, and much better educated than the ordinary run of servants, was brought before the Lord Mayor, on suspicion of having robbed her master, a Mr. Huggins, of Snow-hill. In the course of the investigation, the young woman strongly denied that she had committed any dishonest act, and told the Lord Mayor that she was unknown to her father and mother; that she would consider herself, in fact, an orphan, were it not for the great humanity of a poor woman, to who , e care her unkind mother intrusted her, and who had from her infancy up to the present mo• went supplied the place of a parent to her in sickness and in health. The LORD MAYOR 'asked whether the female whose humanity had been alluded to was present, and up ,, n learning that she was, called her to question her relative to the birth of the prisoner. When the prisoner called out " Mother !" a woman of decent appearance, and about 40 I years of age, presented herself. She appeared much sur prised at a charge of felony against the young woman, and stated to the Lord M+yor, that if the parents of the pri soner bad done their duty, she would now, probably, be in a different rank in society, for her mother was a titled lady. The Loan MAYOR desired to know whether the humane friend of the girl had not received recompence for the ser vices she rendered ? The reply was in the neg►tive. The girl was now 23 years of age, and from the day of her birth up to the present moment, not the slightest contri bution had been given towards her maintenan,•e and edu cation by her mother, except an allowance for a year and a half of the days of her infancy. The LORD MAYOR asked whose daughter she was ? The female said, that his Lordship should be made ac quainted with the name privately. The name was then written by the communicant on a piece of paper, and handed to Mr. Hobler. She believed, she said, that the account would he found to be correct. We believe that the name of the paramour of her Ladyship was not men tioned. lhe Loan MAYOR said that he should cause an inquiry to be made. Daniel Forrester, the officer, said, he bad been informed that the poor girl had been lately seduced, so that her dis tress was complete. The LORD MAYOR said, that the account of that day's transactions would perhaps meet the eye of the mother, who must, notwithstanding she had for so many years smothered the feelings of nature, be stung a little at so melancholy a consequence of her want of the " natural touch." The prisoner was remanded, and Mr. Huggins said that he should cause some inquiries to be made at the pawn- brokers. It was mentioned by a by-stander, that the a ppi ehen ion of exposure would not be confined to a single breast amongst all classes at the west end of the town upon the Publication - of the case. There would be, he was aft 1 something like a general terror, and many an elderly amongst the great would look back with alarm:at days of frailty. Three little girls, 13, 14, and 15 years of age, charged with stealing a pair of breeches. The priso are cast-off clothes-dealers in Castle-street, which abo with Jews and others in that line of business ; and it A stated that th ey sto l e t h e b reeches by a manoauvre very much in practice. It is this—when three or 1 0 who are in concert, see a single person with an article . sale, they commence what is called " a lark," and am laughter and merriment, they manage to get the vies' on the eround, and sometimes half smother and bruise dreadfully. They then scamper off and keep up the j, until they dispose of the property of which they rob hi whilst he is almost in a state of insensibility. A Jew, named Isaacs stated that his daughter, a lit girl 13 years of age, bad a pair of breeches for sale, was beset by the prisoners, who " larked" her, knock' her down, blackened her eye, and stole the breeches. The Loan MAYOR said, that the Jews uniformly PI their childr e n t o some tra d e w hi ch required no mall° labour, and that which they called a general dealer particularly calculated to deprave the moral character, r it introduced at once a system of lying and fraud. 'Lae Jew denied that his trade was worse than sal other, and said that there were even professions whit° acquired for their honourable supporters considerable e 0 lument by lies. fhe Loan MAYOR—Why, you ask eighteen-pence A t , what you will sell for sixpence. What do you call that' Show me one amongst you that ever was a bricklayer or coal-whipper. You are like another sect of religionOi who never work with their bands, but are indefatigable filling their pockets by other means—anything but labour' The evidence in the case not being satisfactory, tb e LORD MAYOR refused to detain the prisoners, but repro' bated the conduct of their parents for bringing them of as general dealers. The parents drelared that they could not keep shell children out of Ca.tle-street, where they practised 0' sorts of fraud and vi:lnny THE MARKET C FRY L ORN MARK Per Quarter. 80, , t0n Gainsborough ----- Grantham -----. Grimsby Horncastle .. Lincoln Spilsby Stamford York I Wheat. s. to s. 41 58 53 67 42 58 44 56 44 60 46 52 47 59 45 64 EFS DIM Barley. s. to s. 24 33 36 41 24 30 20 24 24 29 22 24 30 36 22 27 Wheat, whit . Barley, Malting Oats Pease -..----- NG IHI W NI I °ats• I Beans. 8. to 8. a. to'' 13 18 34 3 9 18 4 0 17 25 37 3 9 14 2 , 2 25 40 14 13 28 39 16 20 35 39 16 21 123 33 32 34 59 10 jg 28 36_, Wheat (per qr.) Barley - Oats NORWICH, July 13. 448 575. 625. I Beans (per qr.) 265. 3014 20s. 265. 28s. }'ease, 28s. 32 5 . 20s. 245. 265. Flour, fine (Der cart() 418. 410_ CANTEPBUItI, July +3 ----- 575. to 635. —s. to —s. 48s. to 605..,,..., —s. to —4 265. to 325. Grinding.. 228. to 278. 20s. to 25g. 20s. to 288. 31s to 355. —s. to 30s. to 365......,. 30s. to 345. MANCHESTER, July 13. Wheat, per 701 b. Bs. Pd. to Ps. Od. Ited 75.9,1. to Bs. 3' Barley, per 601 b 5 0 5 6 Oats 2 9 3 0 Beans, per Imperial quartcr Pease, White, per I mperial bushel 36 039 05 0 5 3 Malt, per 6 I mper i al bushels 3B 0 42 0 Flour, per Sack o f 2801 b 40 0 46 0 IRISH MA DUBLIN MARKET NO , Dav, July 12. To Average' 33 6 90 8 —0 0 15 0 0 12 6 10 7 20 0 _ 0 12 0 16 9 -- 14 0120 0 19 114 j,5 , 2 1 Firsts, from 17s. Od to 19s. uS Average price of Wheat and Flour 40.. Ckl. her . k. ,785 ecends, from 11s. Od. to 165. , ' , Third 5,.,,,.,.,,, from 6s. Oct. to 10s. u" PRICE OF BREAD. s li 4 e i c e e s i o p f ts of F D l o o . ur, J 2 .RKETS, From 2( 0 331 Wheat, per barrel 20 stone 0 Bete lO stone 75 Barley l6 stone 1,469 Oats 12 stone 2,785 Cwt. Flour 9 stone 360 Oatmeal, Sold to Makers only. 10,404 Cwt. Flout _ -- - 7 Nd. 1 Half Quartern ; *1 , ____ ____ IN heat, Barley. 1 Oats. I Flour, per cwt. per barrel per b arre l per barrel ~..t 20 stone. 16 st one. 14 stone. Quartcrn Loaf. _ . ti stone. 116 stone. 14 stone. Ist. 2d. ----I—._ ---....,, s. d. a s . d. s. d. as. d. s. d. as. d. s. d. as. d. s. ct. as. 1 Cork -- 220 246 120 13 01 92 106 14 6 17 6 5 0 14e j Limerick 122 0 263 94 120 82 —Ol6 0 19 0 0 0 15 - Waterfordl2l 0 25 0 9 0 12 0 8 0 10 017 0 18 010 0 16 6 0 Clonmel ...,23 4 25 912 0 13 0 70 8216 0 17 013 0 16 a Carlow-1250 27 010 0 110 70 2 616 6 180 00 ..........„ 0"' Beef, Mutton, Pork, Butter. per lb. per lb. per cwt. Ist. 2d. 3d. tth. 4 d. ad.d.ad.s.d.as.d.s.d.s. d. s. d. s. d. g• el l, Cork i 5 6 5 6 236 26 071069058 0 50 0 44 Limerick— 31 44 31 434 0 35 0720660600 52 0 42 n v 'A Waterford 3 6 3 525 0 26 073 70 68 0600 66 a * Clonmel 3-1 451 61 32 0 33 0 790 74 0 —. g ..., ' Carlow.-- 4 51 0 0 0 0 00 70 60 50 0— 0 -•••• v I 00 1 _,,,, KILKENNY.—Butter 763 to 78s. per cwt. ; Wheat 245. to 0 ; per barrel ; Flou r 20 s. to 345. per bag; Oats 78. to 9s. per V , rel ; Barley 12s. t o 13 s. ; Beef 4d. to U. per lb.; Mutton to bd. ; Potatoes 2d. per stone; Coals Is. 2d. per cwt.; Barn" Pies 265. to 275. 04. per cwt. SCOTCH MARKETS. HADDINGTON CORN 111 A RKE'T.—July 12. Wheat. Barley. Oats. Pease. Beans. First 69.6 Od 31s Od 21s Od 393 Pd 30s Od_, Second s4s Od 28 s 6d 19 3 6d 28s Od 29s Oa Third 50s Od 26s Od 18s Od 27s Od 285 Od There were 384 qrs. of Wheat in market, 372 whereof were sold , 12 Grey, ~. 2/. 14s Average Id. o.l2ths. DALKIETH CORN MARK Wheat. Barley. Oats. First...... 61s Od 29s Od 22s Od Second... 523 Od 27, Od 20s Od Third..... 45s Od 24s 6d 18s 6d '.—July 11. Pease. Beans. 31s 6d --s al . - :30s Od _, od 28s Od _s od INCREASE OF BRIGHTON.--In 1801 this population of Brighten was not quite 8,000 ; in 1811 0 was 13,000 ; in 1821 it had increased to 24,000 ; and i 1831 to 40,000, besides upwards of 1,000 included id the adjoining parish of Hove. The number of houses st the laver survey were B,ooo_a proportion to the jabs' bi tants far greater than in London and other large towns--' the obvious reason for which i-, that about one-third ore constantly occupied by visito rs . Th e average number o f the hitter, with slight fluctuations from the Ist of May tg the Ist of February, is fro m 20,000 to 25,000. The total number of persons who visit Brighton for any spiel of time not less than a week during the year is suppoie to be at least 100,000; perhaps, if a less period of stet' were admitted, this number would be doubled, or nearlf trebled ; but these two latter calculations rest on Jel , certain grounds.—Parry's Coast of Sussex. MRS. AUSTIN'S CHARACTERISTICS Of 11 1 GOeTHE is not wholly devoted to the records of this eX. tra.wdinary man, but also to several of his distingisislie3 literary caption a , nt the o m th o e s r t co i t n u t p e o m rt p a o n r t a rie e I and. interesting t is, wi th b o io u g t r a a n p y hi e: si production which has for many years issued from the English press. It is not assuming too much to place GOETHE'S name at the h ea d o f a l most every branch of knowledge ; the splendour of his literary renown three into the shade that to which he was entitled on other grounds; his labours in Natural History, and even 0 physical science, would have sufficed to make the repo: tation of any ordinary scavant. The work is introduce by a modest and intelligent preface from the pen of th e accomplished translator, who has conferred a life-long ob' ligation by the publication of these soul-precious volume' SUETT, THE COMEDIAN.—..This persoP having offended another, the aggrieved party was deter' mined on revenge, and waited at the theatre door to [mills' him. T.,e night was extremely wet and dark, and as th ° ' actors passed, most of who,n were muffled in their cloak , the enraged man was obliged, le,t he should cudgel tba wrong one, to inquire if he was whom he wanted. IS' length the wished-for man arrived, who, rushing 111 ' wrapped in his roquelaire, and drenched with rain, %II addressed with the usual query—" Are you Suart 7 ' " No," replied h e , " I am d r ippi n g," an d passe d un bno into the Theatre.—To Studio. BIRTHS. Recently, in Prussia, the lady of Major-General GuataY o Brown, of a son, being the fifth. On the 16th inst., at the Marquis of Bristol's, Lady pugu o Seymour, of a daughter. On the 12th inst., at Clarence Cottage, near Portsmouth, th e lady of Alexander Stuart, Esq., S urgeon to the Forces, of . daughter. On the 16th inst., the lady o f G eorge Barnard, Esq., of Cr ss Deep, Twickenham, Middlesex, of a son and heir, On the 16th inst., in Great Marlborough-street, the wife George Knox, Esq., of a son and heir. Mll RRIED. On the 16th inst., at St. G eorge ' s, B loomsbury, George Hin d Cripps, Esq., of his Majesty's Civil Service, Ceylon, to Sal Elizabeth, second daughter o f th e l ate Edward Bullock, 13sq' of Jamaica, and of Upper Bedford place. On the 15th inst., at St. Mary's, Bryanston_square, llavid Thurlow Cunynghame, of Milncraig, Ban., to Anne, tbir daughter of Lieut.-General the Hon. Robert Meade. DIED. Oil the 2d inst., in Bath, Anne, wife of Robert Brooke, Pq; and youngest daughter of th e l ate Stephen Rain, Esq., and t" h Lady Charlotte Ram. PRINTFD AND PUBLISIILD BY MU RD 0 VOUN (3, ATI" SUN OFFICti, II; STRAND, LAN DON • In foo WOMA , is 13 3 ..' Theirk of Allified to speal • LIVES of E 4 , Lady Jane 1 ! A most inter ',mous feeling."- London : Lc tongtna n• Io° tbe 25th w MEN an Pin A te N d N i3 f A Y or Edell, Strand, , Of whc fr om 1808 to 11 Mee IL 7M. bo H. cy ßi Ig_ L aY mO price 1 T his NEWS day Was I printed in do THE C Of the Tha To this new t. tl is . i atiag of a 1 "'gas for layi pb, " t a il s ` Diction. i e. and an s i teaching foltiAfg e book bie . ktkery ar th ri e k a tO in Gl a l 11 . 1 ished of ttkustreet. 80Y ea at °4 " and S ol , 6d. it r tet • by aPpoin kte teli ), NAith, t4n "%tre • • ltr e „ :t ; N 14 3-,:"! Lando] ! c .'td ,t4:l,:ast,te,,,puabila'n'ti Ili LOSS and ar ) .,1.1 F , D 'shed )?,The 1 , kl e ss ' Hy ( . ex. sy he had at ‘ -i tafto n . klt on B treet, t t i e l d 'street, E 4 11. ' Rath . lir ridp e ; Loder, I , t ! ,) L ec i; fr ew , Gore a O ak!an " an ' d fl "wdi n g, Sal 41141,4. pry