The Sun. — London, England, 1863-08-10 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY EVENING, AUGUST 10, 1863. THE CIVIL WAR IN AMERICA. (From the Times' Correspondent.) NEW YORK, July 29. As few people believe the confident assertion of Mr. Secretary Stanton—published in an official document, with his signature attached—that the army of General Lee was utterly "routed" by General Meade, and could not possibly escape into Virginia unless in disorderly and demoralised frag ments, few people are surprised to learn that the Confederate chief—repulsed, but not defeated— has crossed the Potcmac at his leisure, with his stores, his ammunition, his artillery, end the spoils that he gathered in Pennsylvania; that he holds all the lower gaps of the Blue Ridge Mountains, where Gen. Meade cannot pursue him ; and that he is in such strength and spirits as even yet to alarm Mr. Stanton as well as Mr. Lincoln and General Halleck for the future safety of Washing ton. In other quarters the Confederates, though greatly diser pointed and grieviously damaged, are Lot disheartened. VictePresident Stephens speaks words of cheer to the people, and will not despeir of the cause even if Charleston, Savannah, and Mobile should be wrested from the Confederacy, and Richmond itself be doomed to suffer the pain and humiliation of hostile occupation. Charleston makes a gallant defence, and repulses the foe at Fort Wagner with a slaughter . ot which it is sickening to read. Yet the Northern people would be sanguine of speedy success to their arms, not withstanding all these discouraging circumstances, were it not for the character of the recent news from Mexico. They believe that the establishment of a monarchical form of government in that country under the auspices of the Emperor of the French, whether the new potentate be the Archduke Maxi milian of Austria or, on his refusal, Mr. Patterson Bonaparte—or Bonaparte Patterson—will speedily lead to the recognition of Mr. Jefferson Davis and an alliance offensive and defensive between France, Mexico, and the Southern Confederacy. They , know enough of the energy and determination of the Southern people to acknowledge that it would not, under these circumstances, be necessary for the Emperor of the French to send a single regi ment to America; that the South does not want his military aid, but solely that of his navy, to open the ports and procure for the people that access to the outer world for want of which they have been reduced, more than by any thing else, to their present state of suffering. For the time being the Mexican news absorbs the main interest of American politicians of the higher grade. Those of the lower grade are as local and municipal as usual, but every man who can calculate the chances of the future a little more accurately than his fellows is of opinion that the chances of South ern recognition by France, with or without the co operation of Great Britain, were never so favourable as they are at the present moment, and that these chances do not so much rest upon Federal victories or reverses as upon the turn which events have taken in the land of Montezuma. Mr. Seward and some of the leading members of the Democratic party appear to cling to the notion that the South, if it cannot be coerced, can be con ciliated, and that Mr. Lincoln has only to propose a general amnesty, for which they think the time exceedingly favourable ; a withdrawal of the Pro clamation of Emancipation, and constitutional gua rantees for the perpetuation of slavery in the Cotton States, to secure a reconstruction of the Union. The hope is illusory. Even if the South would accept the terms—which is not in the slightest de gree probable—the restored Union could not outlive another four years' Presidency. Such a compro mise would heal nothing, settle nothing, be worth nothing. The flames of civil war might smoulder under the heap of rubbish thrown over them, but would burst forth again with redoubled violence at no distant period. It is asserted that Mr. Seward has urged upon the President to make the attempt, and whether the fact be or be not as stated, it is clear that a very large proportion of the American people do dearly prize the Union as to be willing to consent even to such a humiliation as this would be to restore it in its pristine strength and cohesion. But the thing is impossible. The question of the draught in this city is held in abeyance. The attempt to enforce it will infallibly lead to further disturbance. In the meantime the interest attaching to the riots of the 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th days of this month has not subsided. Whether arising in a sudden outburst of popular indignation against the slavery of enforced military service, or secretly organised by leaders who have had the wit and the good fortune to conceal their names, their persons, and their mode of action, they are likely in their consequences to exert great in fluence on that Northern revolution which the Go vernment appears to have resoved to accomplish. The " Woollyheads," or Republicans, have long ac cused the " Copperheads," or Democrats, of having instigated insurrection in favour of the South, while the Democrats, on the other hand, have as loudly accused the opposite party of fomenting and en couraging the worst excesses of the mob in order to have a pretext for declaring martial law in this city, and of overriding and ultimately superseding the constitution of the State of New York. Both of these charges are baseless. The riots, which were formidable enough at one time to deserve the name of an insurrection, and might have grown into a re volution had there been as much courage in civil as there is in military life in this country, were really the spontaneous growth of popular disgust both with the war and with the conscription, and the Federal Government was not only sorry that they broke out as they did, but was most anxious to turn them to account in its Lrling purpose of welding the North into a homogeneous nation by the extinction of State rights. But, astute as were the politicians of Washington, they found their match in Governor Seymour. Elected by the Democracy of the State to defend State rights against Federal en crotschments, he knew the importance of his posi tion and the necessity of defending it. The Governor of Pennsylvania, receiving little or no aid from the Federal Government in his attempt to arrest the Progress of General Lee, had applied in his distress to . the G ov e r nor of New York, who had responded t° _,_ his call by sending some of his best militia rep "nta to Chambersbnrg and other points of danger. Wha t , the riots broke out these regiments had not returned, of troops. and New York was consequently denuded Such few as remained in the city be longed t o the the eetarat Federal Government, and were under officer. 0 : 1 1 1 of Major-General Wool, a Federal danger, was absent Seymour having no suspicion of on the coast of isi n p t ,.. at an Atlantic watering place out. The Mayo r of jersey when the riots broke at first that the polk e e ' city, Mr, Opdyke, imagined Would be sufficient to restore and preserve order,l3 the insurrection extended and the skieswere reddened with the glare of burn ing houses, he applied to General Wool for the aid of the Federal troops, a,,i wt Z ng as a reason the absence of the State militia. 14eloosylvania. Mr. Opdyke thus admitted that it was the business of tho State 'authorities, and not of the F ederal Go vernment to maintain the peace o f N e admission that will doubtless be remembered disadvantage hereafter, should ha desire to his to enter into any fresh contracts with the War -offi ce f or the supply of military clothing. General Wool acceded to the request ; but not having troops enough in the Federal forts in the harbour and elsewhere to cope with a riot that bega n to assume the most al arming proportions, he made application to the Commander in-Chief of the Sovereign State of New York—that is to say, to Governor Seymour, for the aid of such militia as still remained within the remoter limits of -the State, or that he could muster at sudden call for the defence of society threatened with anarchy. General Wool did what was entirely right, legal, but he and constitutional under the circumstances, grievously offended the Federal Government, as will more fully appear hereafter. Governor Seymour called out his militia ressrves. General Wool con tributed his services, and both forces were placed by Governor Seymour under the command of Major-General Sandford—a State, n ot a . Federal officer.--and everything seemed to promise that, with unity of counsel and of purpose, the insurgents and the thieves who had joined their ranks would be speedily dispersed or capturzd. At this stage of the proceedings—late on Monday evening----a new actor appeared on the scene, Brigadier-General Harvey Brown, a subordinate of General Wool, in immediate command of some Federal troops in the forts of New York harbour, who volunteered his s3rvices in suppressing the riots. His offer was accepted, and he was ordered to report to and place himself under the orders of Mejoie General Sand ford. The new volunteer, however, proved to be of little service. He promised obedience, but did not yield it. He expected, as a Federal General, to supersede or, at all events, to outrank the State General, under whom he was ordered to serve, and his claim not being allowed, he thwarted all the arrangements which it was his duty to promote, and, intentionally or unintentionally, gave the rioters the considerable advantage of uncontrolled possession of whole districts of the city. Ulti mately, and before the night was far advanced, he asked General Wool's permission to be excused from further service. The permission was granted, and Colonel Nugent, Provost-Marahal-General, was appointed in his place, to report to the State General. On the following morning (Tuesday), the riots having gained new strength in the interval, and mainly on account of the neglect or disobedience of which Brigadier-Gen. Brown had been guilty, in refusing to act in subordination to Alajor-Gen.Sand ford, the Brigadier, who was in hourly telegraphic communication with the Secretarypf War at Wash ington, presented himself again before Gen. Wool, expressed his regret at what had occurred , and de clared his willingness to serve under Gen. Sandford. He was accordingly reinstated in his limited com mand, and continued to act, or pretend to act, until Friday, the 17th inst., when he was relieved by Major-Gen. Canby, in pursuance of orders received time riots o had r obstructiveness suppressed, in spite of the tne ineffi ciency of Gen. Brown, and solely by the police and the militia. Gen. Canby was not wanted. There was no pretext for declaring martial law. The Federal Government had lost its coveted opportunity of taking the State and city of New York under its paternal protection, and abolishing its laws, and there was no knowing when another occasion equally favourable might present itself. Governor Seymour was too important a person—too independent a potentate or Sovereign within his own constitutional sphere—to be lightly meddled with, and although the Federal Government would have been glad to make him feel the full weight of its displeasure, it was compelled by prudential considerations to restrain its avenging hand, and vent its wrath in another direction. If Governor Seymour and Gen. Sandford were not Federal officers, Gen. Wool and Gen. Brown were. Both of them had been guilty of thwarting a cherished design of the Government ; a revolutionary design, it is true, but not the less incumbent upon them, in the estimation of Mr. Lincoln, Mr. Stan ton, and Gen. Halleck, to aid and forward when required to do so_ By order of the President, dated on the third day of the riots, General Wool was re lieved of his command, and placed on the retired list. His offence was not stated ; but according to all probability, as well as to common belief, it was his recognition of the authority of Governor Sey mour as superior within the State of New York to that of the Federal Government. General Brown was dismissed in like manner, and was placed upon the retired list. The Government did not conde scend to inform him why he had fallen under its high displeasure. He had certainly endeavoured to place the Federal above the State authority, but he had done his work in so inefficient a manner that it was a palpable failure. It was his duty not to have failed. He did fail, however, and he was punished accordingly. Governor Seymour has taken no public notice of these transactions. By the single-minded and honest co-operation of General Wool, who, when the peace of a great city was disturbed, saw nothing but the paramount necessity of enforcing obedience to the laws, he had been enabled to thwart the re volutionary manoeuvres of the War-office. It would scarcely have been consistent with his dignity to take official cognisance of the little plot which he had so happily and so signally defeated. But he has found a befitting opportunity to place upon re cord his opinion on the vital matter of State rights, and to define the frontier of a Governor of a State —such as New York—with regard to the Governors of other States, and to the Federal Power. In an order of the day, dated the 233 mot., and in his official capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the Military Forces of New York, he has returned thanks to the Militia regiments, which, at his request, a month ago, during the alarm consequent upon the invasion of General Ler, proceeded to the relief of the Gover nor of Pennsylvania, and in words full of warning and instruction has impressed upon their minds the sanctity of the Constitution, which is gra dually melting away in the hot blast of war; and the necessitylof holding fast by the ancient wisdom which established it, if they would escape approach ing anarchy. Aware of the intention of Mr, Lin coln and his advisers to crush out State Rights in all the North and West, as fast as opportunity may serve, Governor Seymour warns the militia of the great commonwealth of which he is the chief magi strate how much depends upon their action in all the perils that may involve both the individual State and the Federation of which it forms a part, "If, he says, "our militia system be allowed to decay, all our institutions are weakened. The mi- litia is the main strength of the Executive, to main tain the laws, put down insurrection, and repel invasion." This is the doctrine of the Constitution, but not of Mr. Lincoln and the revolutionary RApublicans. These, are of opinion that a large standing army, supported by taxation, is the proper and always available instrument to use in such emergencies. "The State of New York," adds the Governor, " has already furnished 260,000 volun- teers to the national service. It now contains within its limits more than 300,000 persons liable to service in its militia. The proper organisation of this great force will not only preserve the power and safety of the State, but enable it to be even more beneficial in its aid to the nation, and to other States than it has been heretofore." There is no mistaking the import and intention of these words. They mean business. They mean that in any conflict which the Federal Government may provoke, with the view of remodelling the institu tions of the North, so as to convert it into one consistent and homogeneous despotism, the Governor of New York will maintain the Sovereign rights of the State, and use, if need be, his constitutional army of 300,000 men for the purpose. The question is perilous, and may become immi nent. The conscription may, at any moment, force it to a strict solution. The Government, in view of the widespread indignation which the mere mention of compulsory military service has excited—and pointedly in deference to the wishes of Governor Seymour, very temperately and respectfully laid before it—has postponed, but has not abandoned, the draught. At any moment which it may deem most favourable for the purpose, it may make a new attempt to enforce it—and as certainly as it does so it will goad the working classes of this and the neighbouring cities to resistance. And if a new insurrection should be the result there is every indication that it will not be so purposeless or so leaderless as the last, and that men will spring to the front who will organize the popular anger to political ends, and, making bloody examples of the 11 . 011 8 e-burners and thieves who may attempt to turn the public commotione to the purposes of plunder, will do progres w ays h_ d a e t pe t n h drs y can to invest social riot with the os hnfMinisters,forthethe dignity I political revolution. To that end things w are marching,How fast or how slow may be their and his to some extent upon Mr. Lincoln And there is this to be said in right s theorists North h who see no homogeneity or be notr B if the constitutional doctrine ofth:perseded and abolished, — that ta th te e reihaueessubjugation of the South are very small, an d the chances of a new secess i on thethrown North is t o b e a overboard in th e in the North very great. If a captain nation, State right s must be with desp o ti c tempest, and there mu s t b e power in the ship. And liesherein like him, error of Governor Seymour, and of a ll, whol of State rights, and yet maintai n that there is a him, speak "nation" in America. If there be a natio n i t i s in the Soutb. The North is a federation — an d not a n ation. Each State is a nation in itself, and the Sovereign State of Ohio differs as much in charac ter, idiosyncrasy, and interest from the State of New York, as Prussia differs from Great Britain, or Holland from Portugal. _ _ . The Common Council and Aldermen of this city, who, as a body, are opposed to the draught and fully sympathise with their Irish friends and fellow countrymen, who resisted it with violence in the streets, have taken a peculiarly Hibernian mode of aiding the Government in its stress for soldiers. Mr. Lincoln requires 300,000 men, of whom New York must furnish 20,000 to 30,000, if the draught be en forced. Under these circumstances , thes e civic digni taries have resolved to tax the city in the sum of 2,500,000 dols,, the said sum not to be expended in bounty money to induce unw illin g men to take up arms, but to buy off from service, at 300 dols. each, no less than 8,000 troops who may be con scripted. The neighbouring city of Brooklyn has voted 1,000,000 dollars for the same pur pose ; so that while Mr. Stanton calls for od i r New York and Brooklyn respond by providing , Mr. Chase with greenbacks. The ab• soldiers, surdity of the proceeding is manifest, and, as far as Nev York is concerned, Mr. Opdyke, the mayor, has resolved to defeat the appropriation by his veto. But as, on the other hand, the Aldermen and Com mon Council ean',veto the act by passing the mea sure cn its recommendation, by a majority com posed of a clear two-thirds of their number, they have determined to adopt this expedient, and force the measure upon the taxpaying community, to the great delight, of course, of all the rowdy popu lation, and of many hard-working men, who will cease to object to the draught if the pub lic will pay for their exemption. It is exceed ingly doubtful whether these civic functionaries have the powers they claim in this respect, and, if they make the a pp ro p r i a ti on , i ts legality will be immediately tested before the Courts. In the meantime, Mr. Lincoln will have to wait for his soldiers, however urgently he may need them. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. LEWES RACES-SATURDAY. A Scurry Handicap Sweepstakes of 10 sous each, 5 ft., gentlemen riders as qualified to ride at Warwick; pro fessionals 51b extra. T.Y.C. About five furlongs. 15 subs. Mr. B. J. Angell's Columbia, 3 yrs, 9st 71b (Mr.W. Bevill) 1 Mr. Spencer's Miss Vivian, 4 yrs, 10st 10ib (in. 51b ex.) (G. Fordham) 2 Mr. Poulson's Antonelli, 4 yrs, lOst 51b (Mr. G. E. Thompson) 3 The following also ran :—Lord of the Manor, Coronet, Juliet, Zeloo, and Poland. Betting-2 to 1 agst Juliet, sto 1 agst Miss Vivian, 6to 1 agst Antonelli, 100 to 15 agst Coronet, 8 to 1 (at first 3 to 1) agst Columbia, 10 to 1 each agst Lord of the Manor and Poland. After some delay they were capitally started, Lord of the Manor showing in front, Zeloo, Coronet, and Juliet close up on the lower side to the distance, where Juliet dropped back beaten. Miss Vivian went to the front with Anto nelli second until opposite the stand, where Columbia was brought to the front with a rush, and catching Miss Vivian in the last dozen strides, won on the post by a head; An tonelli beaten a length and a half from the second; Coronet was fourth, Poland fifth, Lord of the Manor sixth, Zeloo seventh, and Juliet last. The Juvenile Stakes of 50 sovs, added to a Sweepstakes of 5 sovs each, for 2-yr-olds; colts, Bst 101 b ; fillies, Bst 71b ; selling allowances. T.Y.C., about five furlongs. 6 subs. Lord Westmoreland's Overcast, 2 yrs (ao), Bst 21b (car. Bst 31b).... (J. Goater) 1 Mr. Johnson's Buckhound, 2 yrs (L5O). Sst 51b.. (Pryor) 2 Mr. W. Robertson's Hedworth, '2 yrs (z5O), Bst 51b (Brewtey) 3 Betting-6 to 4on Overcast, 100 to 30 agst Hedworth. Overcast waited until arriving at the enclosure, where she came out and won by half a length; Hedworth a bad third. The winner was purchased by Mr. Fleming for 210 guineas, and Mr. Johnson claimed Hedworth. The County Cup of 50 sovs, added to a Sweepstakes of 5 soya each, for all ages ; certain penalties and allowances. T.Y.C., about five furlongs. 19 subs. Captain Christie's Lady Clifden, 5 yrs, 9st 71b (G. Fordham) 1 Mr. Barber's The Clown, 2 yrs, Gst 71b .. (G. Noble) 2 Mr. W. Nelson's Gamecock, 5 yrs, 9st (Walters) 3 Mr W. Robertson's Rizzio, 2 yrs, Est 41b (Earl) 4 Deerfoot also ran. Betting-6 to 4on Lady Clifden-5 to 2 agst The Clown -100 to f 3 each eget Gamecock and Deerfoot (offered)-100 to 3 offered agst Rizzio, Lady Clifden, on the upper ground, made play, with The Clown close up, Gamecock third, and Rizzio fourth. Deer foot, who jumped round immediately the flag fell, was left at the post. The two favourites came away in close com pany after going 200 yards, and Lady Clifden won a good race by a neck ; Gamecock a bad third, and Rizzio beaten off. The Town Plate (Handicap) of 50 sovs, for 2-yr-olds and upwards; winners extra. Half a mile. Mr. G. Angell's East Sheen, 5 yrs, Bst 101 b (T. French) 1 Mr, E. Simpson's Neilgherry, 3 yrs, 6st 12Ib (H. Covey) 2 Lord Westmoreland's Usher, 2 yrs, sst 101b..(Elphick) 3 The following also ran :—Waterwiich, Zora, Coronet, Peignoir, Miss Livingstone, Juliet, Miss Vivian, Atlas, Duke of Cambridge, Southdown, Rest, Don't Come Late, Antipodes, Longstock Lass colt, Isabel, and Highflyer's dam colt. Betting-5 to 1 agst East Sheen-100 to 15 agst Peignoir - - - -100 to 12 agst Juliet-10 to 1 each agst Zora, Miss Livingstone, Usher, and Miss Vivian-100 to 8 agst Neilgherry-100 to 6 each agst Waterwitch and the Duke of Cambridge-25 to 1 agst Antipodes. Immediately the flag fell Juliet jumped away, and at her best pace made play for about 150 yards, when she gave way to Peignoir, who was succeeded by the Duke of Cambridge, Miss Livingstone, and East Sheen. On the right of this lot was Neilgherry, and close to the rails was Isabel, close up. They ran thus to the distance, where East Sheen went to the front, and taking a clear lead at the enclosure won in a canter by a length ; half a length separated the second and third ; Miss Livingstone was fourth, and Duke of Cam bridge fifth, both close up. Southdown and the Longstock Lass colt were the two last. The Lewes Grand Handicap of 15 sovs each, 10 ft, and 3 only if declared, So., with 200 added, for three••yr-olds and upwards ; winners extra. 60 subs, 49 of whom paid 3 sovs ft. Two miles. Mr. R. Ten Broeck's Lord of Linne, 4 yrs, 7st 111b_ _ _ - (G. Fordham) 1 Mr. Morris's Balham, 5 yrs, Bst 101 b Mr. Low's Gibraltar, 5 yrsBst 51b .. . (D. Hughes) 3 The following also ran : —Turn of Luck, The Principal, Dr. Syntax, Cock Robin, Dunkeld, Lavender. Betting-3 to 1 agst Balham-5 to 1 agst Dr. Syntax -6 to 1 each agit Cock Robin and Lord of Linue-8 to 1 each agst Turn of Luck, Lavender, and Dunkeld-100 to 8 agst Gibraltar. The last-mentioned made play at a good pace, followed by Cock Robin, Lavender, Lord of Linne, and The Principal. The others who were running at wide intervals were led by Balham. They ran in this order into the bottom, and when fairly in the straight Gibraltar was joined by Balham and Lord of Linne. At the distance Gibralter compounding left Lord of Linne with a slight lead of Balham, and Mr. Ten Broeck's hAse improving his position won by half a length; ten lengths separated the second and third; The Principal was fourth ; Dr. Syntax fifth ; the next three were Turn of Luck, Lavender, and Dunkeld, who walked past the post. Cock Robin was pulled up, having broken down badly, and had to be destroyed. A Sweepstakes of 5 sovs each, with 50 added, for all ages ; mares and geldings allowed 31b ; the winner to be sold for 500 sovs, if demanded, &c. Half a mile. 8 subs. Captain Christie's Miss Julia, aged, 9st 41b ..(Fordham) 1 Lord Westmoreland's Merry Hart, 3 yrs, Bst 101 b (J. Goater) 2 Capt. Handley's Wangle Eye, 2 yrs, 75t.... (H. Covey) 3 Betting -5 to 2on Miss Julia-4 to 1 agst Wangle Eye -6 to 1 agst Merry Hart. Miss Julia made play throughout, and won by three lengths; a neck between second and third. The Castle Stakes of 5 sous each, with 30 added, for all ages; winning penalties and selling allowances. T.Y.C., about five furlongs. 10 subs. Marquis of Hastings's Attraction, 2 yrs (£3O) fist Mr. Poulson's Antonelli, 4 yr Mr. W. E. Jones's Kin(3o- (J..Grimshaw) 1 (G. Fordham) 2 King of -ss )' 88t Italy, 3 yrs ( £3O), 7st 131 b Mr. Child's Confusion, 6 yrs (£3 (T. French) 3 Mr. Skipton's Dodana colt, 3 o)2st 71b .. ( Custance) 4 Mr. Elphick's Miss yrsNighting 0 ), Tat Sib ( Peppier) 5 , yrs (£3O), Sat 111 b Mr. J. P. Water's Single Peeper, 5 yrs (£3O), (Elphick) 6 Bst 131 b Betting-6 to 4on Attraction, s to 1 agst Con(ill s ?lder) 7 u ion, 6 to 1 agat Antonelli, 10 to 1 agst the Dodona colt. Attraction made play throughout, and won in a canter by f ou r lengths; a neck sep arated the second a nd third. The winner was put up by auction, and bought in by the Mar quis of Hastings for 460 guineas. The Railway Nursery Stakes (handicap) of 10 sous each, 5 ft, with 50 added by the London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway Company, for 2-yr-olds ; winners extra. T.Y.C., about five furlongs. 33 subs, Mr. T. Golby's Madame Walton, 7st 81b .... (3. Daley) 1 Mr. H. Bird's Regina, 7st 51b ............ (E. Martin) 2 Mr. Allen's Geduld (h b), 6st 101 b ........ (S. Adams) 3 Mr. George Bryan's Antoinette, 7st 101 b (car. 7st 111 b) (Custance) 4 The following also ran :—Alamba, Sea Boy, Blight, Annington, Corinthian Tom, Weatherglass, Mother Bunch, and Wheldrake. Betting-9 to 4 agst Wheldrake, 4to 1 each against Madame Walton and Sea 10 0 to 8 Boy, 10 to 1 agst Anto inette, each agst Regina, Corinthian Tom, and Mother Bunch. aid won b y Mme Wthraleetoinozatiadaesaellpatrhaete head divided t h e third and fourth. run d thuieustoaunddtholeirvder;lyti THE RAILWAY ACCIDENT NEAR LYNN. In the inquest held at the Town-hall, Lynn, on the bodies of the persons killed on the Lynn and Hunstanton Railway, the following evidence was taken on Friday after our parcel was despatched :7 Mr.. Bloomfield's examination was continued. In reply to Mr. Edwards, he said—l wanted the wire fence at the place where stock got over to be put up, but was told that the posts were at the other end. I saw the men at work last Monday evening. They left off, having knocked down a fence for 20 or 30 yards and left the line unprotected all the night. There were three cows in the field when the fence was knocked down, but the owner of them took them out. I told the men when the fences were done that they were of no use. I have seen the stock come over the fence. They walked over. By the Jury—The bullocks were short of keep—not shorter than my neighbour's, but there was plenty of water. By the Coroner—We have plenty of water in our own ditches. My attention has been called to the fencing on other parts of the line, particularly on Mr. Hammond's. Three weeks ago it was better than ours, because there was a little water in his drain. We have some fences on the line capable of keeping out cattle. Mr. James Platt, locomotive foreman, said—l was in the train that met with the accident. I was in the f our th car riage. I went over the carriages before they st ar t e d i n th e morning. They were all in good working ord er . I exam i ne d every one. I only go with Wakefield on certain occasions where there is anything important. The excursion train was such a case. to ethese c i a v r e r i c a o g m e s p . l a i a n , t h s e o y f carriages. have Edwards—lt rece i v i e s d m n y o h d e u o t y f were all in good order. By the Coroner—lf the driver had seen the red lights it would have been his duty to stop at a reasonable distance, When I have been guard I have been pulled up by the driver, and I have gone back to stop a following train. If the fireman put on the break it would be felt as much at the end of the train as in the centre. The train was coupled at the station by a porter in my presence. The train might be pulled up in 400 or 500 yards, but some breaks and en gines heavier than others. By the Coroner—l traced the mark of the bullock undo r nine carriages. The first mark was on the first class carriage, on the axle. The bullock lifted the engine, which would weigh about 16 tons. On Saturday the following witnesses were examined : Mr. George Billing said that he was a passenger by the train when the accident took place, and described what oc curred in the third-class carriage in which he was. John Reeve, station-master at Hunstanton, said—l started the trains on the night of Monday. Previous to their start ing I made an examination to see that the coupling-irons were all right. They were all safe. It was by an order from London the train was divided. As to the second train stopping, it was left to my arrangement. The first train was to stop at all the stations, and the second train at none, unless there were passengers who could not get away by the first train. Then, in point of fact, the last train would have been the fastest train of the two. I consider that a proper arrangement. They allowed sufficient time for the first train nearly to reach Lynn before the other started. I purposely left the second standing to allow of 20 minutes to elapse between the two trains. By Mr. Edwards—l would not stop a train that was being followed by another unless I was imperatively fbrced to do it. By the Coroner—l should not think myself justified in stopping after I had passed a danger. I should consider, my - self, that it would be a greater risk in stopping after having passed a bullock on the side of the line with another train behind me. I should consider I was risking the safety of passengers much more. There would have been more dan ger to bath trains. Captain H. W. Tyler, Government Inspector, said he came down to make his own inspection, but he would put himself in the hands of the Coroner. lie was then sworn and said—l examined the line originally, I believe, in September last. I made a minute examination in regard to the fences. Between the stations of Lynn and Wootton the ditches, which are now dry, or nearly dry, were then filled with water, and where is now a low paling there was a wet ditch —where there was no water there was a high fencing. The fences appeared to me to be sufficient to keep cattle off the line. I have seen the fence this morning, and taken the dimensions of it. The ditch, which is now dry, is 7ft wide at the top and 3ft 6in deep, and there is a wooden rail on the railway side of the ditch 14in high. I think it is not so good a protection as it might be, but it is not a very bad fence. It is not all cattle that could get over it. Young hungry cattle might get over it. I have seen such fences in Ireland, where the cattle are wilder than they are here. I have seen in England fences as bad and worse than these, but as I said before, I think now the ditch is dry there should be a better fence at the top of the ditch, When I examined the line I could not tell how dry the ditch would become, and it would then be the duty of the company to put up such extra fences as would keep the line safe. I did not exa mine Mr. Shear's land. I have been examining the fence where the bullock got over, by order of the Board of Trade. I was accompanied by Mr. Robertson and Mr. Sin. Blair. I have been told that there is no fence at all on the front of the land occupied by Mr. Shear. Mr. Edwards—No one could have told him such an in famous lie. Captain Tyler said he would go and examine the place if it was desired. A Juryman—We all know there is no fence there. Captain Tyler's examination continued—lf attention had been called to the want of fences by a person whose cattle got upon the line, it was certainly the duty of the company to have remedied it. I think when the ditches were dry the fence ought to have been improved. They have plate layers on the line, who must be perfectly familiar with the fences, and must see any cattle if they trespass. Looking .at the present state of the line as to the fences, and the proximity of cattle, 1 do not like to say it is absolutely un safe, but I think it is capable of improvement. In reply to Mr. Ward Captain Tyler said--I measured the ditch in three place, two on this side of the potato patch and one on the other aide. My object was to get a low measurement. Those who accompanied me were agents of the company, but I am pretty well accustomed to open my own eyes. By Mr. Edwards —As far as I remember the fences are the same now as when I inspected the line, except as to the water and the wire fences in course of construction. Mr. It. Royston said —I live at North Wootton. lam well acquainted with the line of railway at Wootton. I have observed the state of the fences, more particularly opposite my own land. The line runs nearly a mile along my farm. I have land on both sides. It is nearly all ploughed land. The fences are about 51t. high from the level of the ground. I made an observati on to Mr. Valentine o ne day that the lambs would run through them. I have put net against the rails when I put sheep on —rope net, I think I know te Mr. Blomfield's land . It is all p ast ure. The morning at the accident I saw a bull walk o n the line, betweeno and r 6 o'clock. It came out of Mr. Blomfield's pasture. I saw a man turn it off, an d it went b ack again into the pasture. It walked over the fence. The f ence, in m cattle s my judgment, is insufficient to preven t from getting on the line. Bul locks in hot weather will seek water, to get into it, when the flies are teazing. I think the high fence on the line suffi cient. A five-foot fence woul d suit. There are only two kinds on Mr. Blomf ield's far re_a water dit c h and low fence and the high fence; the highest about 5 feet, and the lowest about a foot. Before the accident I have seen cattle on the line, sheep very commonly. I have turned a cow off. That was about the first week in June. She jumped over the gate, and I turned her back through it. The gate is about 3ft high, spea ki n g from guess. I have frequently seen sheep on, from six to ten times. I have not seen cattle on more than twice. There have been three or four sheep at a time. There were Mr. Knight's commonly, and John Smith's. I have seen their fences, and they are not constructed so as to prevent sheep getting en. The bull I saw on was about a two. year-old. There are plate-layers usually on the line. By Mr. Edwards—The height of a farmer's ordinary oc cupation gate is somewhere about the height of the railway gate. 1 was in communication with Mr. Valentine during the construction of the line, and I did not require of him a different kind of gate. There were only two occasions on which I saw cattle on the line. I never made any com plaint to the platelayers, whom I saw about the lino daily. The Coroner thought it was not a case in which notice was required to be given to the company. They were bound to maintain the fences by the Act. Alfred True said—l was guard of the first train that loft Hunstanton for Lynn last Monday night. Boyce was the driver. 1 was in charge of the train. We left Hunstanton at 7.47. When we got beyond Wootton station I did not hear three whistles. At no part of the journey did 1 hear three whistles. The only intimation I had of an obstrut of on on the line was that he shut off steam an d then put i again. I looked out, but saw nothing. I did not hear of a bullock being seen until after the accident. If the driver had whistled three times I should have applied ray break It would have taken five or six minutes to stop the train. We might have gone 200 or 300 yards in doing it. I did not see Mr. Kendall on the engine. I never saw bullocks on t e line. I have seen sheep. I was g uard of the train when the horse was killed last February. By Mr. Edwards—The pony got 012 the lino at Mr. Gay's crossing. New fences and gates were put there immediately after the report of the pony being killed. Geo. Piper, guard of the second train on Monday evening. —We left Hunstanton at 8 o'clock, and reached Wolferton at 8.25. We did not stop at Wootton. Wo had proceeded about a mile and a quarter past Wootton when I heard the driver whistle for the break. I put it on considerably ; as full as I could. We went about 90 yards after I heard the whistle, when the train came suddenly to a stop. I jumped out of the break and ran up to the train, and found several carriages were o ff th e roa d. I then pl a ced the necessary signals in f ron t an d rear o f the train, and I afterwards did all I could to assist the wounded. By Mr. Pitcher—My break aniwered, but it would not be powerful enough to bring up a train like that. Had I seen a danger signal it would have taken four or five minutes to stop my train. I could have stopped it in 500 yards. By Captain Tyler—We were going 25 miles an hour. Mr. Platt recalled said—The break•power on the train was the tender break, and the break behind the train. It would have been better with another break. Two were suf. cient to stop it, but not sufficiently quick for the approach ing danger. In my judgment, as a practical man, Ido not consider there was sufficient break-power to either of those trains. By Mr. Pitcher—With extra break-power it would have been dangerous to have stopped the train. Frederick Kemp said—l am sub-inspector of permanent way. I knew Mr. Shear of Gaywood. He once made a complaint to me at Middletoa that his heifer jumped over the drain. That was about the middle of April. There is no fence, there is a drain. One portion of it is 12 feet wide, and the narrowest part is 9 feet wide. There is generally a good supply of water from the lock. When he com plained in April last there was water in the drain, as much as there is now-16 inches on an average. The drain is four feet deep. Mr. Shear did not request me tt; put up a fence. He never complained to me but once, and I told him I would attend to it. I meant I would see where the stock got on. I examined it, and I considered it suffi cient to keep out any stock. I set men to clean out a part of the drain. I have heard that the bullocks and sheep have been is the habit of going on the line. I have heard it from the platelayers. 1 got a note from one of them, and I went down on the Monday morning. I asked the platelayer where the place was, and he could not tell me. I do not think that a bullock could get over the fence with out breaking it. I told the platelayer to place a man there to get to know whether the cattle did come on the line there. I have had no report from him. I understand there was a bullock on the morning after the accident, and he broke one rail by going over the rail into the drain. The company are putting up a wire fence further on. I told the platelayer to ask Mr. Blomfield to take his cattle out for a week, as there was a more durable fence being put up. I think the fence is sufficient to keep cattle off the line. William Gnuth, labourer, said—Elvin, foreman of plate layers, told me to go and keop the stock off the line any where where there was any likelihood of their getting on. I went last Monday week about noon. I went against Mr. Blomfield's land. I kept walking backwards and forwards between Mr. Hamond's and Mr. Blomfield's land all the day. I left off after the trains had all passed—at 9. There were some bullocks in Mr. Blomfield's field. There might be 20. I did not see any come on. There were none got on that day that I saw. On Tuesday I went at 6 o'clock in the morning, and kept walking up and down all day. I saw nothing all that day. I went about a mile backwards and forwards. I did the same every day up to this day. I was there the day the accident happened. I was where there was some fencing pulled up. It was Mr. Sherringham's land at Massingham. There were no bullocks on Blomfield's field last Monday night when I left it at half•past 5. I was watching the stock on Mr. Sherringham's land and the sheep on Wootton Common. I stopped at Mr.Sherringham's land all night. The company aro putting up a wire fence there about 4ft. high. That will keep in bullocks and sheep too. There is a ditch behind it. By Mr. Edwards—There are five men on beside me. By Captain Tyler—From Mr. Sherringham's land to the place where the accident happened is nearly a mile. By Mr. Pitcher—l had directions to stop at Mr. Sher ringham's land all night. By Mr. Edwards—l left Mr. Blomfield's pasture about half-past 5. and there were no cattle then in it. By the Coroner—The platelayers there that morning were Elvin, Riches, Laws, Clark, Farrow, and Woods. They were at work just where the accident happened. I did not hear any of them complain of running a bullock off the line that morning. Mr. Richard Ragge__l am proprietor of land adjoining the Lynn and Runstanton Railway. I think it was in the beginning of this year I wrote to Mr. Simpson, the chair man of the company, on the subject of the fences. The reply was, as far as I recollect, that he would write to Mr. Durrant, who would see to it, Some posts were put into my sea marshes, but none whatever between Saywood and Lynn. In my judgment, the fence of the land in Shear's occupation is not sufficient to prevent cattle passing over. Jeremiah Elvin, foreman platelayer, said,—On Monday last I was at work about 100 yards from where the accident happened. I saw a bullock on the line just before the 11.15 train passed for Lynn. I sent a man to put it off. I saw it off. I got over the fence. I was 300 yards from the bul lock, and the train was beyond the bullock, and not above 100 yards off it. I had a complaint of bullocks being on the line from Mr. Bluefield this day fortnight. I had a complaint also from Mr. Shear and Mr. Sherringham's shepherd. By Captain Tyler—l told Smith to go where there was no fence, as, seeing there was no stock on Mr. Blomfield's land, I thought where the fence was down was the most dangerous place. By Mr. Edwards—l asked Mr. Blomfield to remove his stock until the wire fence was put up to his land, and he would not. There were six men daily at work at the fence. Mr. Blomfield wanted us to begin there, but we had made a start at the other end. Wm. March, a shoemaker, said—On the Tuesday after the accident, at half-past 1, I was in the lane leading to the line from the clergyman's house. I saw several bullocks in a field, and ono was feeding in the dike next to the rail s ay. Another went into the ditch, and then up, and' put its feet over the fence and went on the middle of the rails as quickly as I now tell you, It appeared to do it without any difilculty whatever, but the police shouted, and the beast walked back again. William Bird, of Hillington-square, corroborated the pre vious witness. The beast got over better than witness could. Mr. J. S. Valentine, C.E., said the fences on the Lynn and Hunstanton line bad engaged his serious attention. He believed they were efficient, and that cattle could not stray upon the line. He had had a continued interest in the line, and had been frequently upon it. As an engineer he had frequently travelled upon the engine. He never saw cattle, but he once saw a lamb early in the spring. He had many years' experience both in the country and abroad, and he had no personal experience of an accident arising from cattle on the line. The fence of which so much had been said was a fence commonly used on lines which run through a marshy district. On the Lynn and Ely line no fences besides ditches were put at all. By Mr. Pitcher—Moat unquestionably, with the know ledge I have now, I should put up a higher fence. By Mr. Edwards—lt is impracticable to fence against lambs. The Coroner called attention to a case against the Great Western Railway in" Queen's Bench Reports," N. S., page 367, when it was held that lambs having been killed the company were bound to provide fences which would keep them out. Mr, Valentine said, in reply to Mr. Ward, that the ditch in front of Mr. Blomfield's field was cut as a ditch, and not for getting soil for the embankment. The line was not opened until the Inspector of the Board of Trade went over it, and had it not been properly made the inspector would not have allowed it to be opened. At the conclusion of Mr,Valentine's evidence the inquest was adjourned until Monday. The Government inspector and several of the jury went over the line on Saturday evening. Captain Tyler will re port to the coroner on Monday. Foreign Mail Packet List. MAILS DUE. Australia and Mauritius, via Southampton. ..... .Aug. 18. via Marseilles .. Aug. 13. &sail and Cape Terds, by British packet. Sept, 3. Cape of Good Hope, Ascension, and St. Helena.. Aug. 29. China, Penang, and Singapore, via: Southampton. Aug. —. via Marseilles ...Aug —. Falkland Islands ......... Gibraltar, via Southampton Aug. —. India (Calcutta), and Ceylon, via Southampton Aug. —. via Marseilles Aug. 13. India (Bombay), via Southampton Aug. 10 via Marseilles ........ Aug. 20. Portuga1.... Malta, Egypt, and Aden, via Southampton Aug. —. via Marseilles Aug. 13. Newfoundland Oporto and - Vigo U. S. and British N. America, by Brit. packet.... Aug. 13, by U.S. packet.... by Canadian packct.Aug. 7. NV.C. of Africa, Madeira, and Teneriffe Aug. 10 Bahamas, via New York Aug. 27. Mexico.. All parts of West Indies, including Chili, Aug. Peru, 1 • 13, C a lifornia. and British Columbia. A SPITEFUL CHUCKLE.—The friends of the South in England have paid this fortnight upwards of £BOO,OOO for their hearty sympathy. They hold the Con federate Loan of three millions, and it has this week touched 35 per cent. discount, and is now worth in the market about £2,250,000 or a little less than three millions of greenbacks, which bear no interest.—Speclator. GREAT NORTHERN HOSPITAL, KING'S-CROSS.- -Number of patients for the week ending Aug. 8, 1,057, of which 397 were new cases. [ADVERTISEMENT.] —Consumption, all nervous, bilious, liver, and stomach complaints, in every stage, arc only ag gravated and accelerated by drugs of every description, but perfectly curable by Du Larry's health restoring Revalenta Arabica Food, as proved by thousands of cases which had been considered hopeless. We quote a few.—Cure No. 62,914. Miss Lange, 18 years of age, cured after the medical men had abandoned all hopes of her recovery from the last stage of pulmonary consumption, with fearful cough, expectoration, exhaustion, spitting of blood, perspirations, hollow cheeks. emaciated to a skeleton. She is now, thank God, a perfectly healthy, blooming, fleshy girl.—N. Lange, Commissaire de Police. Cure, No. 46,270. Mr. James Roberts, of Fernley Surrey, of thirty years' diseased lungs, spitting of blood, liver derangement, and partial deafness.—Cure, No. 4Y,121. Miss Elizabeth Jacobs, of extreme nervousness, indigestion. gatherings, low spirits, and nervous fancies.—Cure , No. 54,816. The Rev. James T. Campbell, Fakenham, Norfolk, of indigestion Rd torpidity of the liver, which had resisted all medical treatment. In tins, 11b, 2s 9d ; 21b, 48 6d ; slb 11 s ; 121 b, 225; 241 b, 40s. Barry du Barry and Co., No. 77, Regent-street, London ; also Fortnum and Mason; and all grocers and chemists in every town of the United Kingdom. [ADVERTISEMENT.] —Holloway's Ointment and Pills,— Paralysis, ;deep-seated rheumatism, and stiff, contracted joints may always be cured by these medicines if they have a fair trial; but such diseases are not cured in a sin g l e day. The patient must have a little perseverance and determination, and then with these powerful medicines he cannot fail to conquer his disease, however obstinate it may be. The Ointment shoul d be briskly rubbed into the parts affected after they have been fomented with lukewarm water. The Pills, by their :action, on the blood and the humours of the body, are an admirable auxilia r y t o th e Ointment, and improve and invigorate the whole sy s t em . Directions for the use of these medicine; accompany each pot and bottle. SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. SATURDAY REVIEW.-It cannot be denied that the English Government at present occupies an embarrassing position. Neither Parliament nor the country in the smallest degree wishes for 6 war with Russia, and yet there are strong reasons against allowing or compelling France to act alone. It seems that, to a certain extent, and with a view to the attainment of limited objects, Austria is really earnest in the cause. Disturbances in adja cent Polish provinces are as disagreeable as a fire in the next house when the partition wall is made of lath and plaster. It is true that, in 1846, the A aa ,;:ian Government perpetrated in Galicia the same et m:os which are now rousing the indignation R The lives and property _ . of Europe agah _est ,ussia. of the landowners were used to buy the sordid allegiance of the peas ,:_nts, and it appears that the animosities which wei.' provoked between different classes are not yet obsolete. Never- Galicia, where theless, as Count Rechberg says , pfeted, a lawless , pac ifi ca tion has been t:'" ln is not to be compared with the Grand Due'hY o f Warsaw, with its thousands of desperate insurgen." . It is also necessary in some degree to consult the feelings of the more respectable Galicians, and espe cially of the deputies who sit in the Council of the Empire. In all parts of Poland, every person who can read or write is a member of the disaffected or na tional party. If Austria had imitated the policy of Prussia, the revolt might have extended to Galicia; and when civil war was once commenced it would be difficult to limit its range, for Hungary also would probably have taken the opportunity of establishing its independence, and in Italy 400,000 men are anxiously waiting for a moment of Austrian weak ness. It was, on the whole, judicious in the Court of Vienna to adopt the more liberal view of the Po lish quarrel, and to establish a claim to the friendly offices of the Western Powers. It is difficult to suppose that Austria wishes for a war with Russia ; but, in the event of a rupture, no ally would be more acceptable to England. The Austrian army might give effective assistance to the Poles without in volving a general derangement of the balance of power. Joint action with France, although it may become necessary, tends to more serious complica tions. It is impossible to forget the compulsory an nexation of Savoy and Nice. Excuses at least as plausible might be alleged for the conquest of Rhenish Germany, as the material equivalent of the idea of Polish independence. It is evident that England can never be a party to any such project; and yet it might be difficult to protest against the consequences of a war which France had undertaken single-handed. A partnership in operations against Russia would furnish a right or an opportunity of remonstrance, and it might even be practicable, as at the commencement of the last Russian war, to obtain a formal pledge which would preclude the acquisition of new territories. On the other hand, experience shows the inconvenience of joining an ally who has practically the power of deciding war or peace. In a concerted campaign the French forces would exceed the English in number, and as France has the ear of the Continent, all the credit that might be acquired would accrue to the complaceht ally who contrived, in spite of Alma and Inkerman, to monopolise the fame of the Crimean war, Among their numerous virtues the French have never in cluded generosity to a rival ; and the Poles them selves would regard an English contingent as a mere appendage to a liberating French army. Lord Malmesbury absurdly objected to the Poles that they had fought against England under the banner of Napoleon. The same objection would apply with equal force to the Italians, who have been supported by English sympathy in all their recent difficulties and exertions. If any feeling of hostility has sur f vived both the war and half a century of peace, it is perhaps cherished by the Poles themselves, who know England only through French representations. One of their writers lately declared that the enmity of England to the first Napoleon was pro voked by his good-will to Poland. Lord Pal -1 merston and Lord Russell will probably persist in their resolution to frame their communications to Russia in their own language. Identical notes im ply a concerted purpose which at present it would be premature to announce, especially as it cannot have been deliberately settled. The answer of the English Government has been prudently delayed, in the hope that time may supply some motive or some excuse for concession ; and, in the meantime, the combined policy of the three Powers is ripening into an alliance which may perhaps produce a better effect than the most elaborate arguments. Russia ought to know by experience that England,though in recent times the most peaceable of nations, readily warms to an impending or actual war. If the scruples which impede a breach with Russia were overcome by a rupture, moral indignation against the massacres and robberies perpetrated in Poland would come to the aid of patriotic feeling. It is still possible for the Russian Government to comply with the English demand, although it may antici pate further exigencies on the part of France, and if an internal peace can be in any manner patched up, no English statesman will at present demand the reconstitution of ancient Poland. The Russian Goverment is to blame for the partial interference which it summarily and contemptuously repudiates. Having once entered into a negotiation, England cannot honourably retire in absolute discomfiture ; and although the reasons against a Russian war are numerous and obvious, they may be overruled or overborne by circumstances. No for ei g n country appreciates the conscientious objection of rational Englishmen to unnecessary war, but it is easy to rely too implicitly on the supposed sluggishness and selfishness of the community. SPECTATOR. —The slavery of the Frenc h L press itt l i e s costing many Englishmen much money. paragraphs which,cited " official, or " inspired," or " officious," or ‘. Ire , if they were not supposedd. to be onre4v, never connected" c n t o e t d i 'e' noticed m de eb r o a d r y is o ia r n som co e f t e h s :n o g r , e w ould with somebody employed as an tele graphed over Europe, and exchanges rise and fall because some third rate writer, once i m p er i a l funnel, has turned a sentence rather more carelessly than his w ont. Ever y day this week the bulletins have r eproduced some silly, or clever, or officially pompous canard, and as during every pause in events the instinct of men is conservative, the general effect has been to produce a belief that war is much less probable than it was only seven days since. It certainly would be were there the smallest ground for all the stories floating about. One d it is La France which reports that the Court of St. Petersburg, alarmed, at the Austrian attitude and indisposed to resist a power which she had hoped would betray its allies, has adopted a tone of friendly conciliation. Next day it is the Independance Beige which reports that the Emperor seems more cheerful, which is, of course, an omen of peace, the journal not recognis ing the idea that an Emperor may have a digestion. Then the opinion announces that Prince Napoleon is to visit his cousin, and as the Prince, like the man in the Dutch toy house, only shows himself in bad weather, keen speculators look out for a fall. On Tuesday some English paper translates from the Kreuz Zeitung some vague sentences about Prussia wanting allies more trustworthy than St. Peters burg, and affairs are held to look bright; for if Prussia is shaky, so also must be the Czar. Twenty four hours after the same journal republishes (this time from the official Prussian paper) a paragraph stating that Prussia "when she draws the sword will administer very deep cuts," and laces again look gloomy. A "cut" from a Prussian sword is a " menace of serious gravity." Tnere are all manner of rumours about the progress of a somewhat tardy diplomacy. To-day there is to be an identical note despatched to St. Petersburg, and to-morrow these notes are only identical in spirit ; on Tuesday La France thinks everything is settled, on Wednesday Austria raises a hitch, on Thursday somebody goes to settle matters at Constantinople, and on Friday Albion is for the millionth time " perfidious." To judge by the avidity with which all these stories are swallowed one would think that most English men hold State policy to be mere matter of whim, really believed, as gobemouches say, that the world is governed by petty intrigue, and fancied that the attitude of a great State on a question like peace or war could change with every breath. Taken as a whole, and without pausing to distinguish between various shades of absurdity, these reports may be pronounced unworthy of a moment's attention. LONDON REVIEW.—At length the celebrated Swinfen case seems to have reached its close. For nearly ten years—from 1855 until the present time —this singular suit has occupied the attention of the courts and of the public. The will, by which Mrs. Swinfen, who has since be come Mrs. Broun, obtained the Swinfen estate, was made in the year 1851. Every one is fami liar with the history of the trial, in which Capt. Swinfen, the heir-at-law, endeavoured to set aside this will,—of the compromise made by Lord Chelmsford, then Sir F. Thesiger,—of Mrs. S win fen's repudiation of that compromise, and of her subsequent success in recovering the estate. There can be no doubt that it was by the exertions of Mr. C. R. Kennedy, that Mrs. Swinfen was not only enabled to retain her property, but nearly succeeded in recovering damages against her original counsel, Sir F. Thesiger, for having made a compromie f against her will. Nor can any one be surpriseZ that her gratitude should have shown itself in a substantial form, or that a very close intimacy should have sprung up between them. But, an . fortunately, Mr. Kennedy seems to have c too much upon his position , and to haveused h presumed te influence which he had acquired over th e l a d y to obtain for himself extraordinary benefits. A cording to the theory which prevails at the Eng lish bar, the counsel is not supposed ever to with his client. He come directly in contact performs his duty as counsel gratuitously ; and as he cannot recover any fees for his addvocacy, neither can he be made responsible for neg lect in the per formance ot it. Mr. Kennedy was not satisfied with this theory. Though a barrister, he had certainly acted not, so mica as a counsel, but as a friend. He had left his home in ~ the country, had come up o London, had taken a house. and had, in fact, de voted his whole time and ersucia. of his money to promote the cause of Mrs. Swin!en. According to his own account in May, 1869, be. not only induced her to execute a deed by which she gave him £20,000, but she even promised him marriage. From the year 1856 until that time Mr. Kenne d y had continued his attentions; but, un. f ortunately , in 1859 Mrs. Swinfen fell in with a tr. Broun, who captivated the affections of the litigiou.s widow, and neutralised the influence of Mr. Kennedy. From that moment the two frieuds became deadiy foes, and Mrs. Swinfen, who bad already become Mrs. Broun, probably under the advice of her husband, determined to repudiate the deed of gift which she had executed, and to resume posses sive of her property. It is not surprising that Mr. Kennedy should have resisted itsis apparently un gracious act by every means in Os power. He b r ,sught an action against Mrs. Svinfen for the £20,t,,20, and actually obtained a vernier • but the Court of Common Pleas decided that Mr. Kennedy's • barrister position as is disabled him trona making any contract co: remuneration with his client, and therefore set the verdict asid e . Undismayed b y his failure, Mr. Kennedy had recourse to the deed of gift by which he had . obtained £20,000; but Mrs , Broun, in order to defeat h im, took proceedings to set aside this deed on the gr o und tha t it w as ob tained by undue influence, and on this contest the Master of the Rolls has delivered judgment in the lady's favour. EXAMlNER.—Diversities must be expected is justice, as pot homines, tot sententice, nay, caprices hardly surprise us, but what is indeed startling is extraordinary leniency where extraordinary severity seems called for, as if the worse the offence the 'tighter the punishment, and the opposite. There is no place where women travelling also are so much exposed to the danger of insult and outrage as rail way carriages. Between one stopping station and another a solitary female is completely at the mercy of any ruffian who, by chance of design, is in the same carriage, without any other company. A woman so circumstanced and assaulted has iso means of communicating with the guard, and cries are not to be heard in the noise of the rattling of the train, In proportion to the danger to which females are thus exposed, it might be supposed would be the care of the magistracy to throw around them all the protection of the law, and to visit with exemplary punishment all insults and outrages to women in railway travelling. Let us see whether this is done. A married man gets into a first-class carriage with a young lady to whom he is known, when the train is in motion he attempts to kiss her, and being re pulsed, proceeds to gross liberties. The young lady resists successfully, and when the train stops at s station is about to charge him with indecent assault, when, by his entreaties, professions of sorrow for his conduct, and representation of what the conse quence of exposure would be to his family, she is 'nduced to be silent. No sooner, however, is the train again in motion than he recommences his attempts, and upon arrival at the next station the lady charges him with his offence. The case is proved, and what is the punishment for a gross outrage against modesty, once pardoned, and deliberately repeated with the return of a dastardly °Wi le ; nity ? A fine, forsooth, of £6, a mere trifle to a rate in good circumstances, whose condition m a y is inferred from this circumstance, that his nalue only suppressed in the reports, a favour exhibited 011147. to very respectable offenders, that is to say, the nu fians who are, in the common phrase, “ so w ell to do in the world " as to do ill with complete ire.' punity. The effect of the example is that on thla Midland line a fellow who can afford to throw IMO five pounds may take any forcible liberties he pleases with a lady unfortunate enough to be his fellow traveller and unprotected. L e t us co mpare with this decision the view that a Southwark magistrate takes of an offence of a far less serious nature. Th e case before Mr. Burcham was not that of a woman shut up in a railway carriage with an assailant of her modesty, and as much out of reach of pr esent . help and succour as if she had been in a deser t ; bit it was that of a married woman walking the streets under the protection of her husband, and wh o w , a s s pushed against rudely and, as it was at first thought' indecently, by a young man half intoxicated. Upon investigation of the charge of indecent assault, it soon appeared that there was no intentional in decency in the defendant's conduct, but Mr. Bur n cham very properly insisted on making this pt quite clear before he consented to treat the matter as an ordinary assault, for which a fine of forty shillings might suffice and in passing sentence th e magistrate most justly remarked:—" Fortunately for the defendant there was not sufficient evidence to convict him of the indecent assault. Had it been so, he should either have sent him to the sessions for trial, or :have sentenced him to a long term of imprisonment without the option of paying a fine." And had the indecency been proved, Mr. Burcham would have done well in doing as he states; but what, then, is to be thought of the country justices in a case much worse, who, instead of sentencing the filthy offender to a long term of imprisonment, let him off with a paltry fine of five pounds ? COUNTRY MARKETS. YORII.--SATICTItDAY. There was a limited show of wheat to-day, but the sales were good, at fully last week's rates. Oats tolerably inquired for, and prices about the same as last Saturday. Barley scarce, and at quite as much money. Beans made rather higher prices. Wheat, red 448 to 46s I s Oats.... 22 s to 248 White do 4BB to 62s Bean 4os to 42e Barley . .29s to 32s Peas ....-8 to —a Malt, 62s to 64s per qr.; rye, 34s per qr.; flour, 34e to 36s per sack. GRANTHAM-S ATURDAY. To-day there was not much wheat, and the inquiry was fair at late rates. The crops look well here, and promise a heavy yield. New white wheat, 49s to 545; red, 45s to 49s per 365 t.; malting barley, —s to —s per qr ; grinding, 29s to 325; oats, 24s to26s; beans, 38s to 465; peas, 37s to 395. NOTTINGHAM—SATURDAY. Our market was again sparingly supplied with wheat, and the demand was slow, at about late rates. Grinding barley scarce, and business dull. Oats an improved show, and prices about the same as last week. Beans scarce, but late prices exceeded. White wheat, from 43s to 53s ; red:wheat, 42s to 495, Barley—malting, —s to —s ; grinding, 27s to 295. Oats, old, at 25s to 31s Od ; new, 24s to 265. Beans sold at 41v to 45s per qr. ; new, 38s to 435. NORTHAMPTON-SATURDAY. 4,1 White wheat, 45s to 49s ; red, 42s to 468; fine, 47g to —s per qr. Barley, 365,t0 40s—grinding, 29s to 38s; Oats, 30s to 32s per 24 stone. Beans,,3ls_to 40s. Peas, 36s to 42s per qr. LEICESTER-SATuRDAy. Old white wheat, 45s 'to 51s ; new, 48s to 53e per 36 stone. Old red,4.4s to 49s per 36 stone. Barley, malting, new, 34s to 38s per qr.; grinding, 27s to 30s; old oats, 27s to 3.13; new oats, 24s to 26s per 24 stone. Beans, new, 38s to 42s per 38 stone ; sour, 30s to 36s per 20 stone. NORWICH-SATURDAY. There was a fair supply of wheat at market to-day t and late prices were supported. In other articles little business doing. White wheat. 468 to 49s Red wheat ....... 4 3 s to 485 Malting barley ...38s to 40s j Chevalier barley...36s to 37s Distilling do . 33s to 35s I Oats.. 24s to 28a Flour, 32s 6d to 33s ed per sack from the miller. - Full benefit of reduced duty obtained by pur chasing Horniman's pure Tea; very choice at 3s. 4d. and 4s. "high Standard" at 4s. 4d. (formerly 4s. Bd.), is the strongest and most delicious imported. Agents in every town supply it in packets. Births. ,gitehye, Surrey,if e of Thomasand Coal Pope, Exchange, E sri. CANNING,--On the 6th inst., at Abbey-wood, Mrs, S. 00 0 th f d e: Canning, rn 7 B s C hil e e n ht PO c oP i f t E y n , of a daughter. A at 75, Be/gr ave - roa d, the wife ' r fo Captain- O the 7th inon,Rst., . C,8,, o f a eon . .N Marriages. CUMMING—HALDINE.—On the 6th inst., at Dundee, Nicholson Cumming, Esq,, son of the Rev. John Cum ming, D.D., of London, to Anne Stirling Haldane, the youngest daughter of the late Walter Haldane, of Dun 4 dee. WRIGHT—HOBART.--On the 6th inst., at Saint Georgeo, Hanover-square, Lucy Pauline, only daughter of the late John Wri g ht, j un., Esq., of Lenton Hall, Earl of to __, Cap tain the H on . CharlesL. Hobart, fourth son of the a u of Buckinghamshire. Deaths. HuuN_T2-,--2n the 7th inst., Anne, wife of Harry _ E -11 " , ) Esq of Edgbaston, aged 73. wife the 6th inst., at Henley-on-Thames, Chroline, 71. e of Humphery Jeston, Esq., Commander R.N., aged MEYER.—On the 7th inst., Mr. Erich Meyer, of 5 , Streatham-place, Brixton-hill, aged 67. Slur to —On the 6th inst., at Buckworth Rectory, Hunt ingdon, the Rev. John Duncombe Shafto, aged 56. ToItRIANo —On the 6th inst., at Lewisham, Kent, Mar garet, widow of Major Hilary Harcourt Torriano, of the H.E.I.C. Engineers, aged 93. WARD.—On the 7th inst., Mr. Francis Ward, of 22, Alder manbury, aged 53. - - London rrinted and rublished by WILLIAM ANDRE WS of No. 112, Strand, Printer, at THE St Office No. 112, Strand, in the Precinct of the savoy, In the County of Middlesex.— Monday, August 10, 1863. __ - .~~ RE: SEA A' emiu, cheap, `i I PPly ~ 1 ~H] jncori Labatt of his S (Ns First Is Dei Calls n Po c three ro T. R . Is A Shan The Az street The La Messrs. Francis Tempos This system and oth In C. and un apeeta premiu market Mail" ( 4—viz., cent. p 1 the hal annum. It is re quire In tl bein; E deposit tion. It is upon t Glared. Deta May b( 0 111 TIoN (Limit, 15th A. Aug P i'i Pass from 11 for red to relic Yantag Adv to "T 1 Nc The £85,06! £IO,CBI A be parties sums E now h The 018 MI thetA For street, friars, ....._____ P 1 Thom Thom Thi total i The the 1 When PoHeil T 1 liin; M duce ledg the alto) T 1 duri 185 Q 1859 18 , 0 18n1 1862 asst A. P. P.