The Sun. — London, England, 1833-06-27 00:00:00

Wi°!R, 1 ♦~ 1 • . • / 4`',/,91 /, C T ) , ( _._,/a -- 1Y (-,//-7,(6' -- -.: rd Cl:-----Z/l_ , --.- : e!'"l ..._ , i i ,5 4 0 1. ; .-... . tc , ! 1 0 . .---' 4L •-.4 .- CifFl ,i,-- , - r .,,,% S . •it -‘..---"," t i - 71 , ;:*;‘, 4. 7....: ,.... i 0. 1:...7" .. "; co, 3 / 4 4 . ~z ; : • , 7, 11 11,.,, •::,,, /44 \ : iiiii • ' ,k,y) ' , • • , \k4., , \'" , , ' l 4 •n • --. bk . l •• , . . 0 ) ,.('' 41 \ ..., -,, till _ t --- •,.....j..1 ' 6 " 't• 4 ' •' '''' • s._l . . • Cb, V VtSO k; -r iii % slz--,.// 41 i ta. A Bl . , ~.;), , ...• il, ; joi t t i o U ii.,6 .114. fill :3 ) • mI. h.,. ,:. evt - ‘-' IT ttiCal ha. sit- EER SHOPS. COMMONS' REPORT. The foll Owing are the report " and r;s;lutions of the itnmittee on the Bale of beer, presentt-d on Friday to ,e House of Common• by the Chair:um, the Marquis of oindos " 1. That it is the opinion of this Committee, from the 'idence that has been adduced, that considerable evils we arisen from the present mansgement and conduct of beer houses. Arr: III .II,TI*.OFFIGE, Jiryzr. - i 1'33. OTICE is hereby given, that a SESSION 1 3 ,,___nf OYER an d TERMINER an d GAOL DE LIVERY for for th e T r i a l of Offences committed on the SEAS, within the jurisdiction of tbe Admiralty of 0 0. Lon g .,_n d, will b e h e ld a t J ust i ce H a ll, i n t h e Old B a il ey , on TUESDAY, the 2d of July next, at Eight dock in the morning. tiod , And all Sheriffs Gaolers and K of Prisons in : 11 , °se custody any Prisoners, charged eep w e i r t s h Offences co,tri itipdiS may on the High S eas , or w i t hi n the said Jurisdiction, be, are hereby required to transmit a copy of the 10Z"21ttnent of every such Prisoner to Mr. CHARLES (off, N "tS, the Solicitor of th e Admiralty, at hi s o ffi ce , 10, Lancaster-place, Strand, London, in order that 41 _,°_ec! ,, sary measures may be taken for removing all , 1 7- „7? Prisoners to his Majesty's Gaol of Newgate, for trial rg. 1t the said intended Session : and all Mayors, Justices, rOner, tj • and other Officers, before whom any Inquisi -0 git 44') Informations, Examinations, or Recognizances may rl °rt.ttransmitth the same forthwith to Mr. JOHN CLARK, ;u, IL n e Clerk o f A rra i gns o f t h e Hi g h C ourt o f Admi broeietY of En d ths at the Sessons H th e Old g a 4 , lanLondon.i Office, GEORGE ELLIouseOT. in n 1 ' odl TEAST INDIA HOUSE, JUNE 19, 1833. HE COURT of DIRECTORS of the h UNITED COMPANY of MERCHANTS of I;: G LAND TRADING to the EAST INDIES, do ,: }) ,Y give Notice, % 413 at Orders have been given that the arrangement 1: 3 4 " by the Bengal Government in the month of July, r, t , authorizing the Government Agents in charge of the P tper intrusted to them by Proprietors absent 2 41 India, " to remit to constituents in Europe or else the amount of interest accruing on securities depo in their hands, or of the principal of such deposits m e n paid off or otherwise realized by the purchase of ate bills or of bullion," be immediately abandoned, and ki,,.tl'e powers of the Government Agents be again placed n the limits fixed previously to the promulgation of iii arrangement in July, 1832. 181/olders of Paper in the Loans of 1823, 1824, and 25 , end in the 4 per Cent. Loan opened on the '7th of 1 4 4 , 4 i 'i 1831, if resie - ,nt in Europe, will continue to be rled during the Court's pleasure, to a remittance of Cl' interest by bills on the Court at Twelve Months' Ati t e) and at Is. I ld. the Sicca Rupee, agreeably to the . t ertiiemeats dated the 28th of June, 1832, and 16th of 1 114 t _:h 1 833. PETER AIJBER, Secretary. NEW AND CHEAPER EDITION. i 3 day w.is published, in 2 vols. post Bvo., with all the Virlllustrations of the former impression, LLD SPORTS OF THE WEST. s b B 'the Author of " Stories of Waterloo." bieart,cu;arlyacceptable to those who take delight in sports En and field."—Literary Gazette. 4 4„, hmed with anecdotes, sketches, and tales, alternately ic e ° t o ll , and pathetic, but all true to nature."—United Ser , 11b 0 :nal. tt lith n h is Piscatory descriptions the author evinces as much 141%ndaufetlei"nTi as f ie v r e e n n ol e d n l e s c r a c n N e V w altr himself."—r a n ; en li t ,' , n a newor has literally s e pe 4su ak e ing as u w n e known to ktb'ondon world, although within ' three days' speaking, of the ` , Polis."—News. Richard Bentley, New Burlington-street. .._ (Successor to Henry Colburn.) FOR EDINBURGH. ' tHE LEITH AND LONDON NEW 14„ STEAM-SIIIPS, ROYAL WILLIAM, WIL -1,,'41 CHAPLIN, Commander, and ROYAL ADE h.".)E, JAMES MILLS, Commander, each 200 horses' it t :'7, are now appointed to sail from the St. Katha -1/4 'bock Wharf, London, and will land their Passengers, k' 'n Leith Harbour, as follr tu s rd i a — y, Jul 29 at Ten P.M. 1'4 , 1, ADELAIDE S s aturday, June y 4 6 , Te ,at n , , P.M. nCI every following Saturday till further notice. FARES, INCLUDING PROVISIONS. First Cabin £4 4 0 c a S econd Ditto 2 10 0 t triages, Horses, and Goods, on Freight ae usual. N'nformati on o bt a i ne d, b e rth s s ec u r ed, an d G oo d s re ly°„,ecl for shipment, at the Leith and Glasgow Wharf. Also, Ihoe. Robertson, 164, Strand ; H. Underwood, 56, OMarket ; M. Saunderson, Boar and Castle Inn, oa q-street ; Mr. Slark, Old White Horse Cellar, Picea tj; and Mr. Gilbert, Blossoms Inn, Lawrence-lane, t a 7Plide ; where light goods are received, and forwarded " Q e Wharf till Five o'clock on the day of starting. JOSEPH ADAMS, Agent, Leith and Glasgow Wharf. 1O 13 CESTERSHIRE, NEAR CHELTENHAM.— , 1-I`ELIGIBLE INVESTMENT. be peremptorily SOLD, pursuant to a 1 1), 44 beeret a l O r d er o f th e Hi g h C our t o f Ch ancer y, :y id ' , it the causes of "LAWRENCE v. HALLIDAY," BLACKMAN v. HALLIDAY," with the a pp ro . ° O of John Edmund Dowdeswell, Esq., one of the , fi lters of the High Court of Chancery, at the Plough J Three ll,' in Cheltenham, in the county of Gloucester, on ttt: th °on, a AY, e valuable FREEHOLD ESTATE, k consist to ?`'f the Manor-farm of Owdeswell, in the parish of illtington, in the said county of Gloucester, with the s l N . members, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, s l )ri3ing a commodious residence in a dry and pleasant N d 4t I °n) with suitable firm and other outbuildings, in .1 41 repair, and about 156 acres of meadow and arable „' the whole situated within a ring fence, and distant tZt seve n m il es from Chelt e nham, almo s t clos e t o th e \l 4 'nted particulars whereof may be had (gratis) at the Afaster's Office, in Southampton-buildings, Chancery of Messrs. Lyon, Barnes, and Ellis, solicitors, Ai: l g . -gardens, Westminster ; at the Plough, Clielten- York House, and White Hart, Bath ; and at the I\,_t i ' Head, Gloucester. ' VIT.—INIPORTANT FREEHOLD ESTATE. HE FREEHOLD and MANOR of SWANSCOSIBE, with all its rights, privileges, 'okkaPPurtenances, most delightfully s it ua t e a t Swans c, near Gravesend, ;ind extending downwards to the 5, " hank o f t h e r iv e r Thames, with th e hi g h roa d to " t and Paris running through the Estate, will be sold , y 4 j u t- , tion, in 23 Lots, by Mr. Adam Murray, at Garra- Coff e e-ho u ie, on Monday, the Ist of July next. ro ta Estate contains 1,010 A.. 2n. 12r., and is divided t ot ;Lrtts for the convenience of Purchasers. No aitua '!l, e ln be more picturesque and enchanting, combining water, and distant scenery, probably un in the whole county of Kent. It is an interesting , t ) ,itidependently of the beauty of its situation being It t i l tinaany of the brightest events in th e hi s t or y o f our Ipl t , s country. A man of taste may here enjoy the rational , k in ‘igorating pleasures of rural retirement, or recreate i 4 4 Nifrom the fatigues of business, while the short from London (only 18 miles), and the facility of ti l vYanele, both by land and water, afford ample oppor ,‘4Y of partaking, at pleasure, of the diversions and V '''Tnent,.,. of the metropolis. It is presumed that this "r 'Rhtlol , undulating, and commanding situation, em -1 t ag 4 extensive prospects of a beautiful country, heart stirring scene of innumerable shipping, ),. t ng their treasures from all parts of the world to the It ki ll London, added to the short distance from the ca- N vfill render many of the allotments eminently de -16 for the erection of Villas, Cottages, Ornees, and Country Residences. The property includes rich i'Vojroductive Arable, Pasture, Meadow, Marsh, and 0 1 Lnds, Chalk-works, Rail-road, and Shipping-wharf Thames,—Houses, Gardens, Cottages, &c. 4 11 4...iculzus and Specifications may he had ( a ft er th e tA',°'.• June) of Mr. Adam Murray, 61, St. Martin's- Bignell, Esq., 5, Alfred-place, Bedford-square ; ti!°. Tennant, Harrison, and Tennant, Gray's Inn; et Citlrraway's Coffee-house, Change -alley, Cornhill. , E itAL SUCCEDANEUM FOR FILLING DE (kr\YED TEETH, without Heat or Pressure, and IN_ OIIODIBLE ARTIFICIAL TEETH, without It ti or other Ligatures. \ ii ' () NSIEUR IVIALLAN and SONS, Sur. 4 b geon-Dentists, No. 32, GREAT RUSSELL -O,AT, BLOOMSBURY, and No. 9, HALF-MOON- REST, PICCADILLY, grateful for the high and I , i t 4 h ß 'e patronage which has so eminently distinguished "It t rofessional exertions since their arrival in the British Ni - ,,P°lis, respectfully announce to their Friends and the ,',Y D .,.,iu general, that they still continue to restore DE '' -' o '," TEETH, with their celebrated MINERAL k . lir i f-CIANEUM, so universally recommended by the 'N'i . of London and Paris. The operation of Filling iilo, , 14 Performed in a few seconds, without the slightest ~,geat, or pressure. They also FASTEN LOOSE 46,4, in a manner singularly efficacious, and SUPPLY 1 4, i ',,,t or PARTIAL SETS of TEETH formed of the IIe tiI . ' 4 CORRODIBLE MINERAL, or of Natural Sub 11i4+Without WIRE or other LIGATURES—guarPn ? answer every purpose for Articulating and Alasti- N`' , Ctiarges as in Paris. If til F aculty are respectfully invited to witness the suc klik'sult of the Mineral Succedaneum. h One of the above firm may be consulted Mon. 'oeZq Thursdays, for a short period, at Mrs. Short's, /1, 'treet, Great Yarmouth ; and the intermediate 4t Mr, Cutchfield's, Market-place, Norwich. Chugs. Al in Fuji. )1 1,1 t: ' to Sr I sop lei `'. ice lo 50'1'11 trt ol4 4th i 0 ° till ifed °I .nil' vrois r s 0 0 , 11( • ! ; : e I t; el v i c: llo73 ' I a r~°' I to' el . ' (No. 12,729.) BRITISH INSTITUTION, PALL-MALL. THE GALLERY, with a SELECTION of PICTURES, from the WORKS of Sir JOSHUA REYNOLDS, Mr. WEST, and Sir THOS. LAWRENCE, the Three last Presidents of the Royal Academy, is open Daily, from Ten in the Morning till Six in the Evening. Admittance Is.—Catalogue ls. WILLIAM BARNARD, Keeper. Published this day s FACTORY AND INFANT LABOUR. In Bvo., price 95., hoards, THE MANUFACTURING POPULA TION of ENGLAND ; its Moral, Sochi, and Physical Conditions; and the Changes which hare arisen from the use of Steam Machinery; with an Examination of Infant Labour. By P. GASKELL, Esq., " Fiat Justitia." London : Baldwin and Cradock, Paternoster-row. This day was published, in Svo., price 145., A RESIDENCE AT THE COURT OF LONDON By the Hon. RICHARD RUSH. Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary from the United States of America, from 1817 to 1825. " A remarkable work, and one which must be interesting to every Englishman "—Morning Herald. Richard Bentley, New Burlington-street. (Successor to Henry Colburn.) EXCURSIONS IN INDIA. This day was published, in 2 vols. Svo., T OURS IN UPPER INDIA, By Major ARCHER, Late Aid-de-Camp to Lord Combermere. " Possessing a very general, and what is more, an impartial knowledge of India, Major Archer's testimony at this moment is highly useful."—Spectator. " We do not know a work ,that has afforded us more lively pictures of customs and manners."—Literary Gazette. " It will make its own popularity by the force of its real value."—Atlas. Richard Bentley, New Burlington-street. (Successor to Henry Colburn.) SKETCHES OF THE COURT OF ENGLAND. This day was published, in 3 v 01 . ,. Svo., with fine Por trait, from an original Miniature by Zincke, and copious Memoir of Horace Walp le, 11 - ETTERS OF HORACE WALPOLE, EARL of ORFORD, TO SIR HORACE MANN, British Envoy at the Court of Tuscany. Now first published from the Originals, in the possession of the Earl of WALDEGRAVE. Edited by Lord DOVER. Richard Bentley, New Burlington-street. (Successor to Henry Co'burn.) NEW BURLINGTON-STREET. 311 R. BENTLEY has just published the following NEW WORKS of FICTION : I. New Edition, 3 vols. post Bvo., revised and corrected, THE CHAPERON. Edited by Lady DACRE. " Full of proofs that the Authoress possesses much of the dra matic talent of her richly-gifted mother."—Quarterly Review. " Written with so much simplicity, and such refined taste, as to be perfectly delightful."—Times. DELORAINE. By the Author of " Caleb Williams." 3 vols., 28s. 6d. " A tale of surpassing interest."—Scotsman. 111. CONSTANCE; OR LIFE AS IT IS. By MRS. A. T. THOMSON, Author of the " Life of Henry VIII." 3 vols. " One of the most exquisitely natural tales that many seasons have produced. We would place this work beside the Recol lections of a Chaperon.' They are worthy of each other."—Atlas. Third Edition, 3 vols., revised and corrected, with illus trative Notes, now first added, ZOHRAB THE HOSTAGE. By the Author of "Hajji Baba." "" The best novel that has appeared for - several years past,"... Quarterly Review. New Edition, 3 vols. post Bro., THE BUCCANEER. By the Author of " Sketches of Irish Character." " The plot is complex, various, and abundant in action, and the interest is kept fully alive till the last moment."—Times. VI. THE SKETCH BOOK OF FASHION. By the Author of "Mothers and Daughters." 3 vols. 28s. 6d, " A very entertaining work.."—Examiner. REFUSAL TO BURY A SUICIDE.—The Rev. Gentleman Rector of East Horley has written to deny pert of the statement lately put forth respecting his interference with the proceedings of a Coroner's Inquest. He declares that he heard all the evidence, and withdrew of his own accord, lest his continuance or manner might betray the opinion he entertained, and in the remotest degree bias the opinion of any of the Jury. He adds, "I certainly did refuse to read the buriel service on this occasion, for which I felt I had sufficient reasons, offering, instead, to attend the body as chief mourner, and see it quietly put under ground. For this refusal I am, of course, responsible, and shall be prepared to defend it." MELANCHOLY SHIPWRECK.—We are sorry to announce the loss of the sloop Edward, belonging to Mr. CHILD, Mardyke Coal-wharf, Hotwell-road, which took place in the dreadful gale of Tuesday se'nnigh'. She was bound from Newport to this port with a cargo of coals, and ran ashore on the eastern point of Newport river, and became a complete wreck. Her crew consisted of JoHN WEEKS (the captain), aged 22, leaving a widow and two children ; his two brothers, HENRY WEEKS, 20, who has also left a widow, WILLIAM WEEKS, 17, and a passenger who was returning from Newport to this port, the whole of whom unfortunately perished. The body of HENRY WEEKS was picked up the following day a short distance from the wreck.—Bristol Journal. The French Government, it is said, has re ceived from Constantinople a copy of a convention signed by the PORTE and the Russian Plenipotentiaries, relative to the employment of the auxiliary forces placed at the disposal of the SULTAN. By one of the articles the Rus sians had engaged not to evacuate Constantinople before the 26th of June, and until the retreat of haAlum with his army. By another, the PORTE engages to liquidate, three months after the evacuation of the Russians, the amount of expenses incurred by the expedition. It is affirmed that by a secret article attached to the convention, the PORTE promises not to suffer any foreign ships of war (except Russian) to pass the straits of the Dardanelles until the other articles of the convention have received entire execution. A wish is very frequently expressed of late among men of business in the city for the introduction of some further descriptions of silver and gold coin into cir culation, answerable to the general decline in prices and charges of all kinds. As it is, there are very numerous occasions wherein a higher charge than necessary is sub mitted to, preferably to the inconvenience of carrying about a quantity of copper. Silver coin below the value of sixpence, and probably as low as one penny, might now be issued, anti would greatly tend to remedy the incon venience complained of. To make the coin l arger , and less liabl e t o Ise lost, a greater propot tion of alloy might be mixed up with the silver. The same kind of alteration might, perhaps, be introduced with advantage into the gold coinage. The suggestion, at all events, is worthy of attention. In proportion to the almost universal perusal of" Godolphin " will of comae be the anxiety to know who are the veiled characters which are used as the agents in the unrelenting purpose of " the Countess." Conjec ture assigns more than One original to each personage in the drama ; these guesses are at present wavering and contradictory; but a publication has been threatened, the object of which is to illustrate some of the circumstances connected with the origin of the tale—to confirm the right opinion, and to refute the wrong. LONDON, THURSDAY EVENING, JUNE 27, 1833. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF COMMONS, JUNE 26. The SPEAKER. resumsd the Chair at ten minutes pas five o'clock. Sir J. MAXWELL presented a petition from the inha bitants of Paisley, against the Scotch Burgh Police Bill. The Earl of LINCOLN presented a petition from the inhabitants of East Retford, against the Jews' Emancipa !ion Bill. ROMAN CATHOLIC MARRIAGES (IRELAND BILL. Mr. Sergeant PERRIN moved the second reading of the Bill for the removal of the penalty to which Catholic priests are subjected for marrying Catholics and Pro testants. Colonel PERCEVAL had no objection to the removal of the excessive penalty to which Catholic priests weri subjected in such cases, but he was not for doine away with all checks. He should be glad to put Catholic mar riages on the same footing with those of other Dissenters. Mr. O'CONNELL said it was not wished to put Catholic marriages on a different footing from those of Dissenters, but as the law at present stood, as soon as a Dissenting Chapel was built the person recognised as the offic:ating clergyman was allowed to marry persons of whatever denomination they might be. If it were found that there were any checks on Dissenters in the perform. ance of marriages, he would not object to the same checks bring laid upon Catholics. All that was wished was, not that the Catholics should be put on the same footing with the Established Church, hut that they should be placed on the same forting with Dissenters. Mr. LITTLETON hoped, as the principle of the Bill was not obi , cted to, that the House would allow it to be read a second time. Mr. SHAW thought it would be objectionable to do away with every check. He did not wish that the pu nishment for such an offence should be excessive, but it should not be done away altogether. The present Bill did away with the offence altogether, which he thought objectionable, and be did not think the House should he call-d to legislate upon it without sufficient notice, which had not been given in the present instance. Mr. STANLEY said that the objection brought might be very well founded, but it did not apply to the prin ciple of the present Bill. All that was wished fur by tie present Bill was, that the excessive penalty attached to the evil—if (Nil it might be—of Catholic clergymen per forming the ceremony of marriage between Protestants and Catholics should be removed. Whether any other checks upon such marriages in Ireland ought to be intro duced was too extensive a question to be discussed at that time ; but it was one well deserving the attention of that House. By allowing the second reading of this Bill, however, the House only pledged itself to do away with the present excessive penalties, and to place marriages by Catholic clergymen on the same footing with those of Dissenters. If it were considered desirable that cheeks should be laid on, they might be considered in Com mittee. Mr. O'CONNELL begged to be allowed to put the House in possession of the penalties to which a Catholic clergyman was, at present, subject in such a case. By one statute a clergyman might be executed if he married a Catholic and Protestant ; and, by a subsequent statute, he might be fined 5001. for the same offence ; so that a Catholic clergyman in Ireland might be hanged first and fined afterwards.—(A laugh.) The Hon. Member con cluded by some strong animadversions on the couple beggars of the north of Ireland, who were ready at all times to perform the marriage ceremony for a bottle of whisky. The order of the day was then read for the second reading of the Roman Catholic Marriages Bill. Sergeant PERRIN supported the Bill, strongly objur gating the Penal Acts at present in force against Roman Catholic clergymen marrying a Catholic and reputed Protestant. Such enactments were a reproach to the Statute book. The question being put, Sir R. INGLIS opposed the Bill, and said, that with the exception of one notorious character in Longford, no instance bad occurred of any indictment under these enact ments. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL supported the second reading of the Bill. The enactments were a disgrace to the Statute-book, and ought to be repealed as soon as possible ; nor was he by any means disposed to substitute any other enactments, not thinking the case was at all one worthy of punishment. An HOZC- 51iMBER said that the whole of the marriage laws required revision, and to be put as speedily as possible on an intelligible footing. Mr. SHAW opposed the Bill, and observed that it was difficult to know bow to deal with his Majesty's Ministers; for one day they said one thing, and another day another. —(A laugh.) Last sesssion they had opposed with all their might a precisely similar Bill to the present, intro duced by the Hon. Member for Dublin (Mr. Ruthven), and the consequence was that it bad been withdrawn..— (No, no, from Mr. Ruthven.) Mr. STANLEY denied that Government had ever op. posed the principle of the Bill. The Bill alluded to (Mr. Ruthven's) had been withdrawn in consequence of some objection to its details. He (Mr. Stanley) perfectly agreed that the marriage laws, not only of Ireland, but of Eog_ land—(Hear, hear)—required immediate and effectual revision ; for in most points they were disgraceful to the country, and he thought the best place to begin at would be the scandalous enactments in question. Mr. RUTH VEN said the opposition to his motion last session had not proceeded from the Government, but from the bigotry and factious spirit of the Protestant ascendancy party of Ireland, which bad gone nigh to wither up the country, but which, he hoped, was now fast dwindling away. Colonel PERCEVAL said, whatever censure he might incur from the Hon. Member, for which he cared very little, he should persevere in the course he had adopted, not frotn motives of bigotry, but on principle ; and there. fore he should not consent to the second reading of this Bill, at least as it at present stood. Mr. O'CONNELL supported the Bill, and thought it a very unhappy thing that any Member, particularly from Ireland, should be found to countenance such a disgraceful set of penal enactments. The Hon. and Learned Member observed that he knew no less than three most respectable members of the Catholic Church who had been obliged to leave their flocks for several years, for marrying couples, though at the time they married them they believed both parties to be Catholics. The Bill was then read a second time, with but one voice dissentient, and ordered to be committed that day se'nnighC. Colonel EVANS asked a questio❑ relative to the bad state of some walks in Kensington Gardens, or St. James's Park (we did not understand exactly which, from the extreme low tone in which the Gallant Colonel spoke). _ Lord DUNCANNON was also very inaudible. We understood him to so. that there were some alterations to be made, which should be carried into effect as soon as possible. that is many of the Royal Burghs of Scotland the Ma cistrates have large power, both civil and criminal ; and it was felt that it would be very injudicious to consign into the hands of the people the power of electing those whose office it was to keep wrong-doers in order. • It would be hazardous in the extreme to run the risk of men being placed in the magistracy by inflaming the po• pular passions. On this single ground he should resist the amendment. Mr. HUME thought that it was formerly an argument of the Learned Lord that the best way to strengthen the power of the magistrates was to gain for them the support of the people; and he asked if any better were known of accomplishing that than the method of allowing the people to choose those who were to govern them? Mr. J. STEWART thought it,was not safe to make th• road to the magistracy to lead through the gratification of the popular sentiments. The magistrates should be above, not dependent on, the vox populi. Mr. R. FERGUSON thought the Bill, on the whole, a pod measure ; and, as there was a Commission to be ap pointed, be should support the Bill as it stood. He cer tainly wished that the Bill, which would do a great deal of good, should he as speedily passed as possible ; and when passed, the Commissioners might inquire into the best means of improving it. Mr. BANNERMAN recommended the Hon. Member for Greenock to withdraw his amendment. Sir J. HAY thought it was the duty of that House to make the Bill as complete as possible. The issuing a Com mission to inquire would be a good argument against the Bill altogether ; but it ought not to prevent them from making it perfect. The Committee then divided on the amendment, when there appeared— For the Amendment Against it Majority --19 On our re-admis , ion, we found Sir JOHN HAY moving an amendment, which had for its object the reductio❑ of the franchise from 101. to 54 housvholders (as we understood) in boroughs whose popu lation was less than 20,000. He c ,, ntended that in small boroughs, unless this plan were adopted, there would be no constituency ; or, at least, a constituency so small, as to be open to serious objections. Air. JOHN MAXWELL seconded the motion. The LORD ADVOCATE opposed the amendment. on the ground that the same question had been already, in effect, lost in the last Parliament. It was most desirable that they should have one uniform system; and the conse quence of agreeing to this amendment would be, that the 51. householder would claim the same privllege in voting for Members of Parliament, and their demand would be irresistible. Mr. OSWALD and Mr. A. Jourrszows supported the motion. Sir ALEXANDER HOPE could not agree to it. They mutt make a stand somewhere. Mr. ABERCROMBIE observed that the great feature of the Bill was, that it would give a death-blow to the system of self-election in the Scotch Burgh Magistracy, and he was sure that it would meet with the entire con currense of the people of Scotland. He considered 101. to be a sufficiently low qualification, and should support the Bill. It was, in his opinion, a point of great import. ance that the same qualification should be adopted in the electio❑ of Magistrates as in the election of Representatives to Parliament. The change would operate, in a great moral effect, on the great body of the people. Mr. MACLEOD made a few observations which were not heard. Mr. WALLACE said he thought the 5/. qualification was sufficiently high for the smaller burghs. It was as high,iall things considered, in these burghs as 151. or 20/. would be in Glasgow or Edinburgh. Sir JOHN HAY said it certainly was his intention to divide the House. Mr. JOHN MURRAY said he was not disposed to run the risk of losing the Bill entirely for the chance of ob taining a better. He should therefore vote against the amendment. Sir JOHN HAY said he did not contemplate the loss of the Bill when he proposed hid amendment. Mr. J. MURRAY explained. L'rd ERNEST BRUCE said he would support the meascire of the Learned Lord. He (Lord Bruce) had cer tainly bee❑ connected with the old system of the Scotch burghs, and be had thought it his duty to defend their interests in the last Parliament. He had then an oppor tunity of seeing how vicious the system was.—( Hear.) Mr. HUME said he was happy to hear these observations of the Noble Lord, recollecting the sentiments which he expressed in the last Parliament. He took his remarks as a confession of the evils of the system. He (Mr. Hume) should vote for the 5/. qualification, because he thought the broader the basis of election was, the more stable the system would be. Lord E. BRUCE and Mr. ABERCROMBIE explained. An HON. MEMBER observed that he saw no reason why a varying system of qualification should not be adopted according to the size and opulence of the burghs. Mr. KENNEDY thought that it was of the utmost consequence to maintain the identity of the qualification for voting in the election for Representatives in Parlia ment amid that in the election of municipal officers. He considered the 101. franchise sufficiently low in both cases. The gallery was then cleared for a division-- For the Amendment Against it 54 Majority 1 On our re-admission to the gallery, we found Mr. GILLON stating that he had received communi cations from almost every place in Scotland, complaining of the extensive disfranchisement which the measure would occasion. He proposed an amendment to give the right of voting for the municipal officers to all the burgesses Mr. HUME supported his Hun. Friend's proposition. Were not the burgesses of Scotland equal in respectability to the freemen of England ? And did the House recol lect the successful opposition made to the disfranchisement of the freemen of Newcastle and other places? Why should the one class of persons be entitled to a privilege which was to be denied to the other? The burgesses of Scotland were a most respectable class of persons ; and if they were to be excluded from the enjoyment of the fran chise, it would be a gross injustice to them, and would be in all respects a measure of bad policy. The LORD ADVOCATE said that the burgesses were not to be excluded, they were only not to be admitted. The burgesses of the present, were not like those of a former period. The change, owing to the facility with which they now became burgesses, was such as to justify ❑ot their exclusion from, but their non-admission to, the privilege of voting for municipal of f icers. In a great number of the burghs, the burgesses exceeded the 101. voters in number ; in some they were as many again, and in a few three or four times as many ; so that by admit ting them, the principle of limiting the privilege to 101. voters would be destroyed. Mr. C. BRUCE was invare of the facility with which burgesses might be admitted, and therefore recommended his Hon. Friend tc limit his amendment to such burgesses as were already so ; otherwise he foresaw that it might be made the ineans of the grossest abuse. If his Hon. Friend would so modify his amendment, he (Mr. Bruce) wooki cer tainly vote for it. Mr. JERVIS recommended the Hon. Member for Lanark to take the advice of the Hon. Gentleman who bad just spoken. He considered the measure under con sideration as highly unjust and impolitic. The complaint was, that the people of Scotland had no confidence in their magistrates, because they were self-elected. The present measure would increase the evil. He opposed it also as a precedent, which might be applied to England ; for ; it it was contended that it was good for Scotland, it might justly be contended that it was good for England. Mr, GILLON said that, in compliance with the re commendatio❑ of those around him, he was willing to confine the right of admission to burgesses at present in existence. After a few words from General Sharpe, Mr. Banner.. man, Mr. Oswdld, Mr. Lloyd, and others, the Committee divided, when there appeared— Yor the Original Motion lO2 For the Amendment Majority —44 One re-entering the gallery, we found Mr. R. CUMMING BRUCE moving an amendment, the object of which he described to be, that in the burghs those who had votes for the Magistracy should have the right of voting in the election of burgesses. The LORD ADVOCATE said he should oppose the amendment—first, because it was in substance almost the same as the last ; and next, because it had the effect of recognising ski periorities. Mr. COLQUHOUN we understood to support the amendment. (PRICE 713.) After a few words from Mr. EwING and Mr. Cu3l - BRUCE, who said he would not withdraw his amendment, the Committee divided, when there appeared— Against the Amendment l3l In its favour l7 Majority After several verbal amendments,the clause was agreed to. Several other clauses were then agreed to. When the Committee arrived at clause C, General SHARPE proposed an amendment, to pro vide that all voters, like burgesses, be eligible to the ma gistracy. He bad been desired by the magistrates of one of the burghs he represented, to press this amendment to a division. The LORD ADVOCATE opposed the amendment, and a division immediately took place— For the amendment Against it 75 Majority l5 Mr. MAXWELL moved that the borough of Fortrose, with a population of 1,800 souls, be omitted from the list of burghs in the Bill. The LORD ADVOCATE opposed the motion, on the ground that the number of voters was so few. It was ne gatived without a division. The several other clauses and the preamble were then gone through ; the House resumed; the report was re ceived, and ordered to be taken into further consideration on Monday next. The House then resolved itself into a Committee on the Burgh Magistrates Bill. The several other clauses having been considered, The report was received, and ordered to be taken into further consideration on Monday next. The Scotch Burgh Police Bill then passed through a Committee, and wds ordered to be taken into further con sideration on Monday next. JEWS' DISABILITIES BILL. Mr. R. GRANT moved that the order of the day be read for the House to resolve it.elf into a Committee on the Jewish Disabilities Bill. Sir ROBERT INGLIS objected to going into a Com mittee at that late hour (one o'clock), because this was one of the most important questions that ever came before the House.—(Cries of "Go on.") He would take the sense of the House upon the subject. Mr. R. GRANT would be sorry to take any step which would be inconvenient to any Member in the House. He hoped, however, that the Hon. Baronet would recollect the time which had elapsed since the Bill was introduced, the great degree of expectation out of doors on the subject, and the circumstance that they had had two debates upo❑ the principle of the Bill already. If there was any Bill in which the details were in unison with the principle, it was this, in which there was only one clause. Sir CHARLES BURRELL then moved, as an amend ment, " That the House do now adjourn." The gallery was cleared for a division, when there ap peared— For the adjournment 22 Against it Majority 95 On our return to the gallery, we found Sir R. INGLIS in possession of the House. He pro tested against the whole principle of the Bill. He con tended that this was a question whether this country was to remain a Christian country or not. If the present Biil passed into a law, it would no longer be a Christian country. He moved that the Bill be taken into further consideration that day six months. Sir C. BURRELL seconded the motion. After a few words from Mr. Richards, Mr. Maxwell, Major Cumming Bruce, Mr. A. Johnstone, and Mr. Tooke, the latter of whom observed that this was not so entirely a new proposition, for there had been a similar Bill in effect for seven years, during the rebellion of 1715, for certain purposes, and no ill consequences experienced-- The House divided, when there appeared— For the amendment Against it ll7 Majority On our re-admission to the gallery, we found Mr. H. HUGHES moving the adjournment. Lord PALMERSTON opposed it. Lord STORMONT supported it, on the ground that there were many Members absent who wished to express their sentiments on the question. Mr. SINCLAIR was opposed to the measure, but would not support the adjournment. The gallery was then cleared, but no division took place. On our re admission, Sir 0. MOSLEY was moving an amendment on the first clause, to provide that no Jew should be allowed to become a Member of either House of Parliamert. The House divided, when there appeared— For the Amendment 23 Against it Majority —9s On our re-admission, we found Mr. A. JOHNSTONE moving an amendment, that the whole of the proviso in the first clause should be omitted. The House then divided, when there appeared—.. For the amendment 2O Against it lO4 Majority On our re-entrance to the gallery, Mr. PLUMPTRE was moving an amendment on the second clause, in order to nullify the measure, that the words proposed to be left out of the oath, " On the true faith of a Christian," be retained. Mr. BERNAL suggested that the Hon. Member had better move that the clause be omitted altogether. Mr. PLUMPTRE agreed to this form of amendment. The House dividing, there appeared—, For the amendment l9 Against it llO Majority -01 The rest of the clauses were then agreed to, with the preamble ; and the report was ordered to be received this slay. The other orders of the day were then disposed of ; and :he House adjourned at half•past two. According to letters from Havre, there are now at that port 30 whalers fitting out for fishing voy ages. This branch of industry was scarcely known in France three or font years ago. The Conservative clique have passed the last week in great activity and bustle. Their scouts have been upon the alert early each day ; and the meetings of the Club, o❑ Carlton Terrace, generally at the hour of three o'clock, have been numerously attended by the leaders of the cabal. They are reported to have resigned their ori ginal ground of opposition to the Irish Church Bill, see ing that the great body of the people are against them. The Drury-lane Theatrical Fund are about to erect a handsome monument to the memory of KEAN; b OW. is named as the sum. CHANTEY i 8 to be the artist. A YOUNG COUPLE.—PERTH, Auo. 29, 1618.—Mr. JOHN GUTHRIE, on ane sonday efter the efternoons sermone, mariet the master of Sanquher with Sir ROBERT Swurris dochter, ane Inglis knycht in York schyre. Nather of the parties exceeded 13 zieris of age. —Scostman. THE AMERICAN IN LONDON.—" We never had the gratifcatio❑ to read a book that inspired us with more respect for the character of the writer, for his just ness of observatiow, his kindness of heart, his anxious de sire to promote cordiality betwee❑ the two great nations, whose good understanding it was his mission to promote, than Mr. RUSH'S ' Account of his residence at the Court of London.' We feel confident that the extensive circu lation which this work will, doubtless, have, will go fat to remove much of the vulgar prejudice which exists among the ignorant in this country against what is sup posed to be the jealousy of the Americans. We have here the honest opinions of an intelligent American gentleman of us English people, written in a spirit of candour, which forms at once the charm and the value of the writing."— Courier. ENGLISH THEATRE IN THE BRAZILS. —On the 22d ult. the tragedy of Macbeth was repre sented at Rio Janeiro. The place was crowded to soft . ... cation. The appearance of the female part of the audience, consisting principally of English and French ladies, promiscuously mingled, formed a most charminc coup trail. The parts of Macbeth and Bangui" were sustained by Mr. YATES and Mr. NATHAN ; the part o, Lady Macbeth was filled by Mr. THOMAS COPE, a native of the Azores. Mr. PALMER played 4laeduff. The after piece was the Apprentice, and it went off well. Mr. CAMERON was the Charlotte. Some unfortunate di— turbance took place in consequence of a number of young men having improperly obtruded themselves into the gallery appropriated to the ladies ; and some very high words took place between these individuals and the ap pointed guardians of the fair Be:o.—Rio Paper. " 2. That it is the opinion of this Committee that the annual value of the house and prenises held by an y person applying for a beer license be the standard of qualification. " 3. That it is the opinion of this Committee that the justices, at the first quarter sessions after the passing of th e Act, shall draw up schedules for the parishes or town ships of the county, showing the rate varying between 'ii. and 151., at which the beer-house licenses shall be erented, subject nevertheless to such alterations within the above limits as the justices may, at any future quarter evasions, deem right on requisition of not less than six rate payers of the parish or township within which the altera tion is sought to he made. " 4. That it is the opinion of this Committee that it be obligatory, on requisition from any applicant, to give certificate of the amount of rate at which inch applicant is rated, and of the proportion which the rate of the said parish or township bears to the rack-rent thereof. " 5. That it is the opinion of this Committee that it b e requisite that any person applying for a beer license shall produce a certificate (signed by six rated inhabitants of the parish, none of whom shall be beer tellers, in Welch he resides) to the good character of the applicant. " 6. That it is the opinion of this Committee that, in case of application for the renewal of a beer license, it shall be requisite to produce a certificate, signed by six rated inhabitants of the parish, to the peaceable and ree spectable manner in which the beer house has been con ducted in the past year. " 7. That it is the opinion of this Committee that the certificate be signed by the overseer, or assistant overseer, as a proof that the six persons named were rated inhabitants. " 8. That it is the opinion of this Committee that it is expedient that some provision should be made, in conformity with the principle of the foregoing resolutions, for grant ing beer licenses to houses within extra-parochial places, not rated to the relief of the poor. " 9. That it is the opinion of this Committee that, in stead of the penalties imposed by the Act 11 Geo. IV., and 1 Will. IV., the penalty against a beer housekeeper for a first offence shall vary from 40s. to 101. " 10. That it is the opinion of this Committee that, in addition to all other penalties and liabilities imposed by the said Act, the Magistrates in Petty Sessions shall have the power of suspending licenses upon second conviction for a period not exceeding two years. " 11. That it is the opinion of this Committee that, for the third offence, the penalty be, instead of a disqualifica tion for two years, a Mee disqualification fur a period not exceeding three years, in addition to the pecuniary penal ties and liabilities imposed by the said Act. " 12. That it is the opinion of this Committee that the beer houses be closed on Sunday until half-past 12 o'clock tat noon, provided that the keepers of licensed beer houses may be permitted to sell beer by retail not to be drank on the premises within the hours now permitted by law. " 13. That it is the opinion of this Committee that lodgers and inmates of licensed beer houses shall be ex empted from the above prohibition. "14. That it is the opinion of this Committee that the period for ke..ping open at night-beer houses may be extended in the town and contracted in the country dis tricts ; that it should therefore be in the power of the Justices of the Quarter Sessions in open Court, once in each year, to fix the period within their district, in the town districts not earlier than ten or later than eleven, in the country districts not earlier than nine or later than ten. " Your Committee cannot conclude their observations on the important subject which was referred to them by. the House without calling their attention to the expe diency of the system under which all houses are licensed for the retail of beer and spirituous liquors being revised in a future session of Parliament; and, without expressing a decisive opinion on this extensive subject, the Committee feel that very serious reasons of justice and public advan tage may be adduced in favour of an assimilation of all the regulations as to hours and management to which every description of house licensed to sell beer or spi rituous liquors by retail should be subjected." The Report and Resolutions were accompanied with the Minutes of Evidence taken before the Committee; they also have been ordered to be printed. DEATH OP THE RET. ARCHDEAGOX T110111.5021.—We announce, with deep and unaffected re uret, the death of the Rev. Archdeacon TnoursoN. which took place on Wednesday night at his residence on the Mardyke I'arade. Archdeacon Tssouraosr in early life was the associate of the present Lord Chancellor of Ire land, and of the late Dr. Maass of Dublin ; and the friendship of those distinguished individuals was calti •ated with mutual ardoir, till death terminated it on the part of the latter. Hi• collegiate career was opened in zealous and indefatieable exertions, anal closed by his appointment to the benefice which he lately held.—Cork Constitution. A stall in Lincoln Cathedral is vacant by the death of the Rev. Licssuus CHAILLU Humrazr. SINGULAR CIRCUMSTANCE.—A correspon dent states that some swallows are building their nest on the edge of a very antique looking-glass in the lodging room of a person at East Cottingwitb. The window of the room is left open in the day time until their labours are over, and at four every morning the owner of the room re-opens it, and has much pleasure as he lies in bed, in watching the great industry and admirable ingenuity of the feathered builders.— York Herald. MR. BANIM'a POPULAR WORK.--We are requested to state that a new and cheap edition of "The Smuggler," by Mr. Banat, author of " Tales by the O'Hara Family," complete in one volume, price Is., with two illustrations, printed uniformly with the " Waverley Novels," will appear on the Ist of July, being the 29th volume of " The Standard Novels and Romances," pub lishing monthly by Mr. BENTLEY. This cheap edition of the most sterling modern works if fiction now com prises the most admired productions of Cooraa, Gonsetti, Miss AUSTEN, the Misses PORTER, Mrs. BRUNTON, Mrs. SHELLEY, Mrs. INCMIALD, MADAME DE STAKL, the Misses Litz, &c., any volume of which may be had sepa rately. Orders received by all booksellers. The giant mortar, which made so much noise during the siege of Antwerp, burst at the camp on the heath at Braschaet en the 18th inst. Some artillery men were practising with it preparatory to its being exhibited at a review, which is to take place on the 24th, by the Kinn. It had been three times charged, first with 21, then with 17, and afterwards with lb kilogrammes of powder, and it was ascertained that it carried the shell to the same distance and with the same force with the smaller as with the greater quantity. On being fired the fourth time, it was charged with only 9 kilogrammes of powder; but probably being too closely rammed, it split in two, throwing a piece of iron weighing 8,000 kilogrammes, or nearly 6,107 English pounds, to a distance of abeve 20 feet.—Happily no one was wounded.— Golignani's es. SUGAR REFINERIES OF LONDON.-.-A pub lic meeting of tradesmen, shopkeepers, and others, inte rested in the welfare of the Sugar Refining Trade in the Eietern district of London, was held on Monday even.. ing, at the Court-house, Osbourne-street, Whitechapel, G. OFFER, Esq., in the chair. The Chairman said, that out of 200 refining houses in London, more than 100 were in the Tower Hamlets. In the latter, the sugar refiners used to pay far labour more than 600,000/, per anuum—now it was under 200,0001. If Brazil sugars were allowed to be mixed with colonial sugars, this country would be able to supply foreign markets at a fair price. This would give employment to capital and shipping, and the sugar would be paid for by our ma nufactures. If foreign sugars continued under prohibi tion, refining houses in all parts of the continent would be established, and if the trade was once lost, it would not be easy to regain it. There were ten complete sets cf apparatus for refining house, now manufacturing in London for one city alone on the oontinent.---(Hear, hear.) Mr. Gounx, Mr. J. APC.estie, Mr. It. M'Cans, Mr. Fouteiza, and others, addressed the meeting, and it was agreed to present petitions to the Kixe and the Parliament, setting forth the distress of the sugar re fining trade, aad the necessity of taking off the metric tive duties on Brasil and other sugars. A deputation was also appointed to wait on Lord ALYIOIIIIr. A crime has been lately discovered near Chantilly, which reminds as of the feudal ages. An inheritance having fallen to one of the noble families of that neighbourhood, and one of the suns, whose presence was required, not making his appearance, the father was asked what had become of the son. As he did not give a satisfactory account of his son's absence, suspicions' arose, and, after some search, the y oung man was f oun d i n a subterranean prison, where he had been shut up for seven years, with an iron collar round his neck, by which he was fastened to a post. It appears that this young mar wished to marry a person beneath his rank, which the parents prevented by this horrible means. No further particulars are as yet known ost the object... Galismanis hiustnyen ROYAL SCOTCH BURGHS. The LORD ADVOCATE moved that this Bill be recommitted. An How. ME➢SBER. asked whether the Hon. Member intended to introduce any Bill with reference to the Par liamentary Boroughs, as be had done with reference to the Royal Burghs of Scotland ? The LORD ADVOCATE said that there were not suf ficient materials at present prepared. After a few words from Mr. EWING, which were not distinctly audible i❑ the gallery, the House resolved itself into a Committee. On the first clause being read, Mr. WALLACE moved an amendment, to the effect that the provosts, bailies, treasurers, and town clerks of the burghs should be elected by open poll, as well as the town council. The Hon. Meraer stated that the Bill was on the whole a most use ul and excellent measure. It put an end to the self.eleaion and close system, which had caused so much discontent in Scotland; at the same time that discontent would, he was afraid, continue to a considerable ext,nt. He did not know why the Magis trates should not re elected by the people, instead of being elected by the intermediate body of the town council. Mr. GILLON supported the amendment. It would get rid, amongst otner things, of the signed lists, which led to great corruption. _ _ The LORD ADVOCATE stated that the amendment had been proposed and discussed in the Committee up stairs, and the Committee came to a conclusion that it could not be admitted. The reison which led them to this determinatiou was this was proved before them This day was published, GODOL P H I N. In 3 vols. post 8 vo. " We scarcely hesitate in saying, that of all late Novelists, the writer of Godolphin' more especially weighs upon the springs of society as they exist now : here are pictures of Lon don high life that have never been exceeded. One of the finest things Is Lucilla's letter to Godolphin. Mrs. Opie never reached it : Mrs. Inchbald, Simple Story,' only approaches it"— Spectator. Richard Betttleft, New Burlington-street. (Successor to Henry Colburn.)