The Sun. — London, England, 1830-03-03 00:00:00

C _‘ i_ e , „A_ . . . . . , 2 _ . . • _ . , . _ . • • CONTRACTS FOR BUTTER, CHEESE, AND --tgt s . ;, 2 .7 0. 5 u l ~,,' OATMEAL. - _ a. VICTUALLING OFFICE, MaitcH 3, 1830. ttili . "....._ 1 l AO) mow' li l‘ ' ' . .. '' , 1, o. ‘ 1 4 . A r t ' • ' E‘, , nn ...,„:,..),,, ~,,_. ir. ~' .0,,,, ,he- • Ve • it _ . - ; ff,) ;i- ‘: - --t..A --(• • ---- ko 0 . . .• ....4.\.•.4; I.l' ' - k 4-- ...*c 4 .. ..' . . . . - .., k ... ""' t.. '.- ' ' ,I '' 4 ; ' tr ' •$.! : - k• - 4 ;6 . —',ll' ', ° t 4 ' 4 1 . .;--‘) , . - ... ,V 4 , Ls '.l 4 .1 , 1 S l— •,,; : t ~. a, „, -"e -i;sti-. 9 - !,,,,),,,,,,‘ 1if0 . .i.,. , t0 - -I t 0 ' - I ell 11l ,- iiip . 41 1 I '_ln;i4i.2..=- r MAsi morning her Royal ann. THE Commissioners for Victualling His Majesty's Nary, &c. do hereby give notice, tlat on "lingual-, the 11th instant, they will be ready to re ceive Terriers in writing (sealed up), and treat for Eight Tons of BUTTER, Ten Tons of CHEESE, and Forty Tons of NEW OATMEAL. To b e delivered into his Majesty's Victualling Stores It Elrptfuril, one halt of the Butter and: Cheese I y the Slit i ns t ant , an d th e rem ainder by the 30th day of April 141 t, and the whole of the Oatmeal in the month of April next. Samples of the Oatmeal must be produced with the • Tenders. The Conditions of the Contracts may be seen at this t)thlce. Each Tender must spicily the price in words at length, eud be delivered before One o'clock on the day appointed, 41 4 the Person who snakes the Tender, or some Person on 'his behalf, must attend to answer when called for. M. WALLER CLIFION. yesterday glided by ow, Earls nt MEL 3REL, Sir lizQuER, ition near LONDON, WEDNESDAY EVENING, MARCH 3, 1830. No. 11,661. PRICE 7D. yeBterday This day was published, price 59. 6d. in fancy board, APHRENOLOGICAL BIJOU, or VADE-MECUM of MENTAL SCIENCE, &c. &e. &c. " 4s a lover of riches finds wealth, So a lover of truth shall find truth." SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE-(THIS DAY.) Doke -street, Spitalfields, silk-manufacturer—J. Fry, Whitechapel, corn-dealer—S. J. Buckingham, Liverpool road, Islington, victualler—F. Lee, Althorne, Essex, horse 6aler—E. H. Noy, Cannon-srr•eet, coon •y scrivener—E. Oke, Falmouth, Tulloli, Gloucester-street, Hoxton, merchant—J. Coppock and C. Cross, Gutter lane, Cheapside, silk-warehousemen. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. all cases where he shall think fit, to issue his commission to any one of the Judges of the Courts of Record to in quire before a Jury into cases of alleged Lunacy. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL doubted whether the measure of the lion. Member would accomplish his own object. He did not, however, oppose the bringing in of the Bill. buoinegi State for FROM LLOYD'S. LIVERPOOL, MARCH I.—Arrived the George Canning, Allyn, from New York. Off port the Anacreon, Lenox, from Virginia. CORK, F ra. 28.—Arrived the Lord Wellington, from Bermuda : and Stentor, from Corfu. MILFORD, MARCH I.—Arrived the Priscilla, Roberts, from Odessa. quint for roaming, at ;oing the fustise he Judgoe try of the he Judges yesterday arty hour 14ndon: Printed fur the Author, and sod by thus Chalice, and Co., 65, St. Paula Church lard. W. Bullock and T. Hunt, Manchester, silk-rnanufac turers--E. B. Prosser and W. Prosser, M,nmouth, stir• geons—J. Masland, jun., and W. Masland, Melina-build ings, Westminster-road, pawnbrokers—J. Parr and R. Poole, Manchester, ironfaunders—G. Cresswell nod J. S. Beaumont, Loughborough, lace-manufacturers—J. Innes and Co., Little Tower-street, wholesale cbeesernongers— M. Gray and P. Gray, Pocklington Canal Hea 1, York shire, coal merchants—J. Collinridge and Co., Lig uorpond street, coach-makers—D. Sangster and Co., Milk -street. Cheapside—W. E. Long and W. Cottingham, Battersea, coal-merchants—M. C. Drury and G. Drury, Strand, goldsmiths—D. Spring and H. T. Spring, carpenters—H. 0. Cahill! and A. H. Dixon, Union-street, Southwark, hat mannfasturers—S. Wallace and J. M‘Lean, Blackburn, Lancashire, drapers—J. W. Cohen and Sr Cohen, Dublin, jewellers—J. Heslop and I. Holme, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, liawn-drapers--R. Janie's and Co., Clwapside, warehouse men—W. Perrin and • T. N. Beat, Pershore, Worcester shire, drapers—l. Robson and T. Morris, Bridewell Wharf, Blackrriars, coal-merchants. - Air. R. GORDON supported the motion. Mr. O'CONNELL supported the measure as a part of a general system of Llw Reform, which be considered to be the most desirable of all reforms, except one—the Reform of Parliament. MR. COLMAN'S NEW WORK. Ia Two Vols. small Svo., with Portrait, dedicated by Gracious Permission to his 'Majesty, RANDO M . R E COItDS, By GEORGE COLMAN the YOUNGER. This day was published, No. XII. (to be continued every Two Months, alternately with the Gardener's Magazine,) 30 . 6d. HE MAGAZINE of NATURAL HISTORY, and JOURNAL- of ZOOLOGY, B OTANY, MINERALOGY, GEOLOGY, and ME TEOROLOGY. 'Conducted by J. C. LOUDON, F.L.S. G. S, Z.S., &a. Vols I. and 11. containing Nov. I. to X may be had, pric e I/. 161. boarde, Printed for Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green. Fer.atouTtr, MArten W.—Arrived the Inte grity, Bit , ldoek, from Bengal and 'Mauritius. After a few words from Sir C. WETHERELL, Dr. PairwmottE, and Mr. M. A. TAYLOR, in reply, leave was given to bring in the Bill. numerous Sunday mong time of DAR LLETORT, A. CHARLES "Perhaps few individuals have enjoyed to an equal ex tent with this great public favourite, the rare privilege of being admitted to the very first, we might almost say, ex clusive society. The recollections of his life are therefore fraught with no ordinary interest."—Courier. Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley, 8, New Burling ton street. DicaL, Meacll 2.--Wind S.W. with fog.—Remain the Marquis Camden, Underwood ; Roslin °ode, for St. Anne's ; Nepoe, Lord Goderielt, Branken Moor, Apollo, Medora, Alexander, Ocean, Barbadoes Philter, English man, and Mai tin. PORTSMOUTH, MARCH variable.—Sailed the James Laing, Leighun, for Jamaica. MR. NASH. INGNAII, CMARLIS I SOTHE- Jr. FITZ IFIRRELL, PRESENT STATE OF THE COUNTRY. This day was published, pike Is. A FEW BRIEF HINTS on the CAUSES of the PRESENT DISTRESS. ; iirittes Ridgway, Piccadilly; and of all Booksellers. Also, now ready, A Stiewo Edition of Alr, CANNING'S SPEECHES, trreited by himself ; with - MEMOIRS of his LIFE, by l its. llEßitY, Esq., portrait, Vie-similes, Rte. 6 yols., SELLING OFF UNDER PRIME COST, IX CONSEQUENCE OF THE LONDON BRIDGE APPROACHES. DA ItTMOI.IIII, MAUCH t.-Off port, the lithe, Harr'l,!, - from •Penaug, sailed Sept. 1, from the Cape Dec. 17. MPO It TA NT SALE of STOVE -1- GRATES, KITCHEN RANGES, PATENT WARM AIR STOVES, with ascending or descending lines, FENDERS, FIRE-IRONS, TABLE and SUS PENDLW LAMPS, CHANDELIERS, VENISON DISHES, WATER PLATES, TEA and COFFEE URNS, PAPER-MACHE _anti other TEA TRAYS, PATENT DISH- COVERS, KNIVES and FORKS, and Culinary Utensils in-general. - _ The extensive Premises denominated the LONDON STOVE GRATE BAZAAR, being required for the new line of approach to London Bridge, the most exten sive and valuable Stock of Furnishing Ironmongery in the kingdom must be sold forthwith, preparatory to pulling down the Premises, in compliance with the Act of Par liament. Nrw YORK, FEB. B.—The Scion arrived at Charles ton, from Havanna!), :spirts that a Mexican privater had been cruising off Havannah and captured several. Spanish vessel•. Three or four Spanish ships of war had sailed in pursuit of her. on Sun- Etsucoaa, FEIL I6.—The Sound is covered with fast ice The Thomas, Wiltshire, from Riga to Londonderry, has finished her repairs, and is now ready for sea. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF' LORDS-(LAST NIGHT). The LOAD CHANCELLOR. took his seat on the Wool sack shortly after Five o'clock. FROM THE GAZETTE OF LAST NIGHT. Crown Office, March 2, 1830. MEMBERS RETURNED TO SERVE IN THIS ?RESENT TAB. LIAMENT. the room ribly; in - eseanting nerita of however, teasation. ue of the kable avi eined his aordinary an that of k enough the after st them ipon Saw ), named icked him [once colt g ; up to I) 1, and ence: At Ise party .nxiety to , but - bad irn round ivouritee. le betting Cressida. e Bruns e Sal colt the Oaks i Slipper The day's 'foraged as iken) alpus derick ken) r. GOD , by of the nee. The aid to be ,ker will, the title , of tinct, WA$ Dx family rould have ost forgot the origin' rar ? Se- lentioned ; nay, holy' ke made e caravah! informed beard in rom Eun- uare, Mo. , Barrack- EN;, of tev. Hese) ! :sq., eldeog a Elliaort i Covent lf, he Earl o f nt Stuart? aeline, sole Esq., ad The brid. .ord Stn4o of Robe; in the 49' 1 of Thooo the gre 3l knits, Mt l. of the late igo assasoi rtnding 'nroent. John Roe' ! wife of J• ife of J. M. Nato', Egli' )UNO, A ( DON. • 'CONSTABLE'S MISCELLANY. 1" ' la ) . Wall Published, Vols. 50 arid 51, price 7s. -Fror, on fi ne Piper, 10s. containing' HE HISTORY of CHIVALRY and THE CRUSADERS. 4he Rev. HENRY STEBBING, M.A., M.R.S.L. London : Hurst, Chance, and Co. ; and Constable and Co. • Edinburgh. Dedicated, by permission, to the Hon. Mrs. Augustus This (lay w a s Legge. published, in One Vol. large 12 no. price 91. RINGSTEAD ABBEY, or the STRAN GER'S GRAVE ; with other Tales. By Mts. SARGANT, Author of 4' The Life of Cranmer," Ace. London : Hurst, Chance, and Co., 65, St. Paul's Church-yard. • Where may be hsd, lately published, by the same Author, in One Vol. 12mo. price 6.. 6d. THE LIFE OF ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. This day was published, pries 3a. 6d. bound, a New Edition of JOHNSON'S ENGLISH DICTION ARY, with WALKER's PRONUNCIATION of all the difficult or doubtful Words. Printed by C. Correll, for Hurst, Chance, and Co., 65, St. Paul's Church-yard. The two Standard Dictionaries of the English Lan guage are their of Johnson and Walker the former in all that regard. the authority and spelling of words, the latter as t• their pronunciation. The object of the volume now offered to the Public is to combine hi a portable form the advantages of both : and to assist in acquiring the ease and elegance of a correct speaker in the current language •f every dey. This day was published, by W. CURRY, Jun. and Co., Dublin • HURST, CHANCE, and Co., London; and OLIVER and BOYD, Edinburgh; AN APOLOGY for the ESTABLISHED CHURCH in IRELAND; being an Attempt to Prove that it is more pure than in any period since the 11eforanation... 414ieties of Letters, • stittressed to the Earl. endoun tactile]] . ay the Rey. HENRY IN EWLAND, B.D , Vicar of Baunow. One Vol. 12mo. pric• ss. boards. • • Where may be had, • An ANALYSIS of Bishop Burnet's Eaposition of the Thirty-Dine Articles, with Notes. By THOMAS NEW LAND, A. 8., T.C.D., 12mo. 9s. 6d. cloth. CLARENCE TERRACE, REGENT'S PARK. Desirable Residence, handsomely fitted up, with imme diate possession. TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION. By Mr. JOHN ROBINS, (Of Warwick House, Regent-street,) At Garraway's Coffee-house, 'Change-alley, Cornhill, on THURSDAY, March 11, at Twelve, A , Desirable LEASEHOLD ESTATE, Comprising A COMMODIOUS RESIDENCE, handsomely fitted up, and adapted for the accommodation of a FAMILY of the FIRST RESPECTABILITY, pleasantly and cheer fully situated, No. 3, CLARENCE-TERRACE, REGENT'S-PARK, With the 'advantag e of a Double Frontage. Containing on the Upper Floor, Two good Attics and a large Closet. Second Floor, an excellent Bowed Bedchamber, three other Bedchambers, and two Dressing -rooms. On the Principal Floor, two handsome Bowed Drawing rooms, wills coloured, communicating by Folding Doors, handsome Cornice, and beautiful Statuary Mat ble Chimney- Pieces handsomely carved ; Balcony in front ; a Boudoir, and Store-room. Ground Flo:or—A neat Entrance Hall, with Fire Place; Inner Hall,vrith handsome Circular Staircase, Iron Balustre, and Mahogany Handrail, Walls Stuccoed and Painted ; au. excellent- Dining Parlour, Breakfast Room, Butler's Room, —to.e =vat* and Water Closet. The Basement is conveniently arranged with suitable Offices, Wine, foyer,e and Coal Cellars, an erection at the back, adapted an Offic e or other purposes, with a door way opening to the Park-road. The principal part of th e Fixtures are scheduled, and the the Furniture Purchaser may h ave immediate possession on taking b To be viewed byvaluation on the P re tick e t s on ly. P art i cu l ars may be had inises, of John Huish Webber, E sq ., N o . 26, Hatton .Garden ; at Garraway's ; and of M r . R o bi ns , 170, t on Garden of who m tickets may b e had. NO RTHAMPTONSHIRE. Valuable Freehold Estate, discharge d of Tythe, Eligible fur Investment, c a pi ta l M anor abounding with Game, i toyaltiee and Appurtenances, Manor Farm House, Agri vulture! Buildi ngs , and Enclostfres of Rich Feeding Medow, Pasture, and Arable Land, containing upwards of Three Hundred and Forty-four Acres, with Fishery ita the River Nen for nearly Two Miles. TO BE SOLD II 1 7 AUCTION, By Mr. JOHN ROBINS, (Of Warwick House, Regent street,) At. Garraw ay ' s Co. tTre-leouse, 'Ch ange - alley, Cot-Mail, on THUILIMAY, March 25, at Twelve, by Order of the Exe cutors of D r . Roberts, A VALUABLE FREEHOLD ESTATE, •`—ii- discharged of Ty the, situate near Thrapstou and Ciampi, in . the County of Northampton, comprising , niio , T HE, MANOR OF STO KE DOYLE, Aboundingll over One Thousand Three Hundred Acres, g With Ca ine , w i t h t h e Royalties and Appurte nances ther,to Attu , sip of t THE l MANO FARM HOU ouse of S 1 OKE SE, HALL, With 85101 anciens, e R t Mansion H Outlettildings, &v. Stables, Dove House, Beast Houses. Sundry Enc'oautes of rich feeding 31"dow, 1)4 "nle, and Arable Land. In the occupation of Mr- George and who I notice to quit. Contain ing upward s of y' '" THREE HUNDRED AND FORTY-FOUR ACRES. Alms th e Phltery in the River Nen for nearly two miles, and the Right of cutting Rushes in half the laid River. .toke Doyl e i s two miles from Ounelle, and five from 0 1 ;?"130 0 11, and t h e hituution and quality of the Land are a very superior detect i lion mew * u n usually low. P and the P a r oc hial Assess ' m a T w h i e r /14 "°r is nearly surrounded by the well preserved Tu bile°l**l.ord Lilforti arid Jesse Watts Russell, Evq• vie w"! by app'ying to the tenant on the pre s tu rn i=e a s v , hs hail; at the Whiteteand of whom Who will show the Ese - thstupton : of Jh', Hart, 8 rartieular , _ or ._ nit T,hrapston ; Georele.ehNhos, Solicitor, Ouudle ; Ai r. Kin h e 8 E2.. and Mr. yvel, Lottebury ;at G„r,g,wlty. 4 S oli c itor, 13, 1 1 3 : u T s o Is e n a h n o d u se o f Air, Rubio.% No , 170 , Regent-street, London. e • The Goods are arranged for public inspection, and the price attached to each article. FISH-STREET-HILL. EAST INDIA. COMMITTEES. With reference to the East India subject, we may as well state that our reports, or rather brief sketches, of the evidence before the Committees, have been objected to for their incompleteness, and therefore for their possible tendency to produce an unfair im pression. We have on that account come to a re solution of withholding, generally, all further ex tracts or abridgments of the evidence, so long as the Committees shall sit with closed doors, and our regular reporters shall be excluded. In the mean time we insert the following, which has been sent to us, as explanatory of, or supplementary to, the last statement of the examinations which we pub lished : " The evidence of Messrs. Brown and Milne was such as was never given on the same question before in a Parliamentary inquiry, and was equally original and curious. A correspondent was present during the whole, and says that it produced astrong impression upon the Committee. Mr. Brown stated, that he himself, since the year 1821, had exported British woollens and cottons in American ships to Canton, to the value of between 700,000/. and 800,0001. sterling ; and he estimated that this might be from one-third to one-half of the whole -quantity- exported within the time in question. Of this important fact no notice, we observe, was taken in our former report. Mr. Brown, on being asked if the Chinese received the Americans favourably, adduced as a proof, that the losses sus tained by them in a great fire, which took place at Canton in 1822, were made good by the Chinese Government. Mr. Milne gave in American price currents of tea for ten ) ears, with a comparative statement, in which the American money was re duced to sterling, and these exhibited an enormous disproportion between the price of the Company's teas and the American. Mr. Milne further stated in evidence, that for ready money teas might always be had in the United States at 15 per cent. less than the quotations in the price currents, which were purposely, as he said, made high, to assist the Market. This, the most important fact of all to the British public, was not noticed in the report. The former report states, th:•t the Americans consider their teas to be equal to the English in point of quality. Mr. Milne said, that he himself would go no further than saying that they were equal in point of quality, but he added that many English gentle men, and particularly ladies, had told him at once that they were a great deal better. Mr. Milne also gave evidence to show that they must be so, be cause the English teas, in consequence of the pro visions of the Commutation Act, are always older than the American teas by a whole year. In proof of the superiority of fresh to old teas, he showed that the American teas of the past season were hardly saleable when the fresh teas at rived front China. He even showed that in China itself the new teas are by at least 30 per cent. more valuable in the market than those of the preceding season, and this state ment is fully corroborated by a series of Canton price-currents. Mr. Brown and Mr. Milne are de scribed in the report as merchants of Liverpool, by which it would appear to be understood that they are interested parties. Mr. Brown, it is true, is a merchant of Liverpool, but he came forward with great reluctance, being obviously interested in keep ing matters upon the present footing, because in the event of a free trade l►e would inevitably lose his agency, as the Americans would certainly lose their trade. In answer to a question from the Committee, he expressly stated that a free trade to China would be prejudicial to his interests. As to Mr. Milne, he is a native of Manchester, and now resides there; he passed thirty years of his life in America, a great part of it engaged in the tea trade with China, in which he made a competent fortune, and is not now engaged in business at all. It would be highly de sirable if the evidence were published fairly on both sides. Many members of the Committee are favour able to this course, but when the question was tried they found themselves in a minority, and the two deputies who are allowed to be present in the Com mittee-room as an act of grace, are expressly pro hibited from publishing the proceedings."—Times. BIRMINGHAM POLITICAL UNION.—The Birmingham Journal of Saturday gives the following copy of a letter from Sir FRANCIS BURDETT to Mr. ATTWOOD:— " NOUSE OF CODIXIONS, NIB. 19, MO. " Sta,-1 accept with great pleasure the invitation to join the reformers of the important Town of Birmingham, and shall be happy to co-operate in any way in my power for promoting their great and necessary object. " The very flattering manner in which you communi cate to me their desire for my co-operation, adds much to the pleasure with which I subscribe myself most truly, their and your moat obedient humble servant, " F. BURDETT." " To Thomas Attwood, Esq., Birmingham." AFFAIR OF Hosoun.—ln consequence of an altercation which occurred on the stairs of the box en trance at the Theatre Royal, on Saturday evening, during which Sir R- O'D- was assaulted by Mr. Sir R-, eJrly next morning, delivered a hostile message by his friend, Mr. O'K-r, of A-n. The result was, an appointment to meet yesterday after noon, at tbr:e o'clock, at the Fifteen Acres. The usual preliminaries having been arranged, and Sir R---- having taking his ground, further proceeding in the affair was for. funately rendered unnecessary, by Mr. rt cciv ing for his friend an apology, which was signed on the spot, in preeence of the parties assembled...-Dublin Aforniog ,Rvidon BOROUGH OF CLONILELL Eyre Coote, in the room of James Hewitt Massey Dawson, Esq., who has accepted the Chiltern Hundreds. COUNTY OF MEATH. Arthur Plunkett, Esq., commonly called Lord Killeen, of Killeen Castle, in the said County, in the room of Thomas Taylor, Esq., commonly called Earl of Bective, who has succeeded to the title of Marquis of lleadfort. Whitehall, February 26. The Lord Chancellor has appointed Luttrell Lewin Clark, of Ludlow, in the county of Salop, Gent. to be a Master Extraordinary in the High Court of Cancery. Whitehall, Feb. 24. The Lord Chancellor has appointed Stephen Adcock, of Cambridge, in the county of Cambridge, Gent. to be a Master Extraordinary in the High Court of Chancery. DECLARATIONS OF INSOLVENCY. Charles Fletcher, Great .Marlow, Buckinghatnbh ire, car p nter. William Greening, sen, an.] William Greening, jun., Hampstead, Middlesex, carpenters. George Gilson, Cross-street, Blarkfriars-road, Surrey, timber-merchant. BANKRUPTS. George Morris, jun. Norwich, slater, to surrender March 10, II , at four, awl April 13, at two, at the Swan Inn, Norwich. Clarke, Richards, and Medealf, Lincoln's-Inn • fields, London; Puwley, Norwich. Gt•orge Westlake, Great James-street, Bedford-row, lodging. house-keeper, March 9, at eleven, 16,'Elt ten, and April IS, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Niter, Copthall-court, 'rhrogmorton-street._ Henry Lloyd, George-street, New-road, jeweller, M irch 5, at twelve, 12, and April IS, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. Wills, Ely place, Holborn. Juhn and George Howorth, Spotland, Lancashire, worsted-manufacturers, March 15, at seven, 16, and April 13, at ten, at the Magistrates' Office, Halifax. Emmett, New Inn, London ; Craven, Halifax'. John Shepherd, Beaumont. mews, Weymouth-street, Maryleboae, corn dealer, March' 12, 16, and April 13, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Sole, Alderman bury. Henry Paulin, Berwick-upon-Tweed, innkeeper, March 5, at eleven, 16, at ten, and April 13, at nine, at the Court of Conuni.sioners. Burn, Bell-yard, Doctors'_ Commons. Robert Clark and James Tucker, Blackfriars-road, Surrey, oilmen, March 5, at eleven, 16, and April 13, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners. Parker, Furni. vat's-inn, Holborn. Thomns Barron, Preston, Lancashire, money-scrivener, March 22, 23, and April 13, at ten, at the Mitre Inn, Preston. Adlington, Gregory, and Faulkner, Bedford.. row, London ; Southward and Ascroft, Preston. Joseph Dawson, Keswick, Cumberland, ironmonger, March 16, at four, 17, and April 13, at eleven, at the Globe Inn, Cockermouth. Chisholme, Hal, and Gib son, Lincoln's-inn-fields, London; Fisher anti Son, Cock. ermout h. Obery Thomas Johnson, Huddersfield, woolstapler, March 16, at six, 17, at ten, and April 13, at two, at the offices of Whitehead and Robinson, Huddersfield. Clarke, Richards, and Medcalf. Linco!n's-Inn-Fields ; Whitehead and Robinson, Huddersfield. James White, Taunton, Somersetshire, upholsterer, March 9, 10, and April 13, at eleven, at the George Inn, Taunton. Norton and Chaplin, Gray's-Inn-square, Lon don; Winter, Taunton. _ _ James Jenner, Linfield, Sussex, wine merchant, March 9, 16, and April 13, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. Squires, Bedford-place, Southwark. Mark Frideberg, Paternoster-row, medicine-vender, March 9, 16, at one, and April 13, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners. Hughes, George-stteet, Minories. William Cruikahank and Edward Lokham Whitehead, Lewishatn, Kent, corn-dealers, March 9, at twelve, 16, and April 13, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. Williams, Alfred-place, Bedford-square. John Clayton, jun. Castle-mills, Bedfordshire, miller, Match 5, at six, 6, at nine, and April 13, at six, at the Cross-keys Inn, S. Neot's, Huntingdonshire. Fowler, St. Neots ; Lloyd, Bartlett's-buildings, Holborn. Ellis Price Sutton, Clement's-inn, money-scrivener, March 5, at two, 9, at 3, and April 13, at two, et the Court of Commissioners. Conway, Castle-street, Holborn. Benjamin Green, Field-end, Austonley, Almondbury, Yorkshite, corn-miller, March 16, at six, 17, at ten, and April 13, at two, at the offices of Messrs. Whitehead and Robinson, Iluddetstield. Clarke, Richards, and Metcalf, Lincoln's Inn-fields; Whitehead and Robinson; Hudders field. DIVIDENDS. J. Jackson, Liverpool, .corn-dealer, March 24, at one, at the Clarendon Rooms, Liverpool—W. Evans, Rother hithe, ship-builder, March 30, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners—R. Curtis and T. Hall, Angel-court, Throgmorton-street, merchants, March 12, at twelve at the Court of Commisbioners—M. Morgan, Ship ston-upon-Stour, 'Worcestershire, linen-draper, March 23, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners—C. Griffin, Skinner-street, Snow-hill, mercer, March 26, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners—C. Crokat and T. Wilkie, Lawrence Pountney-place, merchants, March 26, at three, at the Court of Commissioners—D. 3PCarthy, Shadwell, coal-merchant, March 26, at twelve, at the Court of Com missioners—W. Ellis, Liverpool, draper, March 25, at two, at the office of Mr. Mawdsley, Liverpool—C. I. Wathen, South Hamlet, Gloucestershire, victualler, March 26, at twelve, at the Upper George Coffee-house, Glou cester—W. W. Edwards, Fleet-street, boot-maker, March 30, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners—S. A. Poole, Exeter, dyer, March 23, at eleven, at the Globe Hotel, Exeter—W. R. and G. Jones, Potters-fields, whartingers, March 23, at eleven, at the Court of Com missioners—AL Myers, Houndsditch, hatter, March 23, at ten, at the Court of Comniissioners—T. Guy, Liver pool, grocer, March 26, at two, at the office of 311.. P. Woods, Liverpool—J. B. Storey, Blaudford St. Mary, Dorsttshire, tnaltster, March 25, at eleven, at the Crown Inn, Blandford-Forum. CERTIFICATES-111.nm 23. J. W. Robinson and IL M. Robinson, Walbrook-build inga, iron tube manufacturers—C. C. Clarke, York-street, Covent-garden, bookseller—R. Mellor, Derby, innktepei W. Henvhall, Kinderton, Cheshire, carrier—E. Hunt, • The Earl of SHAFTESBURY moved that an humble address be presented to his Majesty, praying his Majesty would be graciously pleased to order that the 21At, 22d, and 23d Report of the Commissioners of the Revenue in Ireland, and of certain departments in Great Britain, might be laid on their Lord hips' table•. The Consolidated Fund Bill was read a second time, went through a Committee, and WaY ordered to be read a third time to-moir.)w. The Clerk of the Peace B dances and the Lnnatic Asy lum Bills went through a Committee. Earl GOWER presented two petitions from the Iron Masters of Shropshire, one against the East India Com pany's Monopoly, and the other praying relief against the payment of Wages by the Truck system. The Mat quis of BUTE presented a petition from the county of Glamorgan, signed by upwards of SOO persons, praying the repeal of the Malt and Beer Duties. Mr. Plowden, from the India Board, brought up au Account of the Salaries and Emoluments of the Judges and Officers of the Supreme Courts of India, which, on the motion of the Earl of SHAFTESBURY, was ordered to be printed. Adjourned at Twenty minutes past Five o'clock. HOUSE OF COMMONS-(LAST NIGHT). In consequence of the ballot on the Wexford election, he gallery was not opened this evening until Five o'clock. WEXFORD ELECTION. The following are the names of the Committee upon this election : Lord John Hay, Panton Corbet, Edward Webb, Ralph Howard, Philip C. Sydney, R. B. Smyth, G. Easthope, J. H. Coote, Maxwell, and Henry Clive, Esqrr. ; and Sir Francis Baring. Lord JOHN RUSSELL moved the second reading of the St. Giles Improvement Bill. Mr. HOBHOUSE objected to the second reading. Sir J. FREMANTLE supported the second reading of the Bill. . After a few words from Lord JOHN RUSSELL, the Bill was re►d a second time. Mr. C. PALLMER brought in a Bill for improving such parts of the parishes of St. MarrNewington, and St. George the Martyr, as were not already provided for in former Acts of Parliament—Read a first time. On the motion of Mr. Secretary PEEL, it was agreed that Mr. C. Barclay should be discharged upon payment of his fees. Sir C. COLE presented a petition from Glamorgan, praying for the repeal of the Duties upon Malt and Beer. —Ordered to be printed. Mr. HUSKISSON presented a petition from a Gentle man of the name of Burgess, relative to the Currency. After a few words from Mr. WESTERN, Mr. HUSEIS sox, and Mr. M. A. TAYLOR, the petition was ordered to be printed. Mr. HUSKISSON presented a petition from certain manufacturers of tobacco and' snuff, praying an alteration of the'Exeise Laws.—Ordered to be printed. Sir R. HILL presented a petition from Salop, praying the repeal of the Beer Duty ; and also a petition from the Iron 111erchants, relative to the payment of wages in goods. —Ordered to be printed. Mr. DUGDALE presented a petition from certain pa rishes in Warwick, praying the repeal of the Malt Duty. Ordered to be printed. Mr. KEMP presented a petition from Lewes, praying the Abolitim of Negro Slavery.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. CAVENDISH presented a petition from the county of York, praying that the Trade with China should be thrown open.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. O'CONNELL presented a petition from a Chelsea pensioner of the name of Smith, complaining that five per cent. was deducted from his pension.—Laid on the table. Lord ALTHORP presented a petition from Kettering praying the repeal of the Duty on Malt ; a similar peti tion from Northallerton, and two to the same effect from parishes in Norfolk.—Ordered to be printed. THE BUDGET. Lord F. OSBORNE wished to know from the Chrm cellor of the Exchequer whether any and what reductions were contemplated on the subject of the Malt Duties? The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER hoped that on the 15th he would be able to introduce the general views of Government on that question, and generally on what was usually called the Budget. The Government, sharing in the anxiety of this House and the public, had determined to come down at an earlier (lay than usual, to make such a statement as be trusted would be satisfactory. --(Hear, bear.) The Noble Lord's question would then be more conveniently answered. The petition was then ordered to be printed. Mr. ROBINSON presented a petition from an indivi dual relative to the Cultivation of Wuste Lands.—L aid on the table. Sir J. GRAHAM moved for Returns of the Contract Prices of Bread and Meat for the Army, from 1819 to 1829.—OrCered. Mr. WESTERN presented a petition from a parish in Es•ex, complaining of the High Duty upon Malt.—Or dered to be printed. Lord J. RUSSELL presented a petition from the Pro vidence Friendly Society, praying fora revisal of the laws regulating such Sicieties. After a few word + from Mr. PORTMAN, the petition was ordered to be printed. Mr. STUART, on the motion for committing the East Retford Bill, should move that it be an instruction to the Committee to pass a clause requiring that all Members hereafter elected for that borough shall make a declaration that they have not obtained their return by bribery or' corruption. LUNACY INQUIRIES. Mr. M. A. TAYLOR, in bringing forward the motion of which he had given notice, should confine himself to facts which bad come to his knowledge as to the expellee of Commissions in cases of Lunacy. The expellee of Lord Portsmouth's commission had amounted to 25 0001. 01 all the eminent men at the Bar with whom he had con versed upon the subject, there was not one who did not go along with him in thinking that these expellees ought to be 'educed. If theme was any Hon. Member unacquainted with the circumstances attending Mr. Davis's Coot muisaon, he trusted that they would advert to the published uttounts of what took place before that Commission, previous to the second reading of the Bill. Mr. Davis bad accunneated a property amounting to 16,0001: for his family, and there was expended of that sum in resisting the suit of the parties before the Commission, nearer 4,0001. than 5,0001. The Hon. Member contended that the Judger employed to try these issues were not the best adapted for such a purpose, and that they ought to be sent before some of the ordinary Judges and a Common Jury. He was of opinion, and many others entertained the same, that the Lord Chancellor, did n ot po s sess the power of sending such issues to a Jurv. The Hon. Member moved for leave to bring in a Bill; authorising the Lutd High Chancellor ; in Colonel DAVIES rose, in the fulfilment of the pledge he had given last Session, to bring forward an inquiry into the conduct of an individual, against whom he was under the necessity of bringing a charge of the graVest nature, and which had already been the subject of in quiry lraf'ore a Select Committee. He assured the House that he felt considerable pain in the discharge of this duty. The world was so apt to attribute motives of a private nature to an accuser, that their sympathies were generaly excited against him, and in favour of the accused. It' that was the ordinary ease, his situation was ten-fold mere embarrassing, as he had, in some degree, to contend with the resolutions of a Committee, appointed at his own sug gestion. There was nothing but a sense of public duty and a feeling of the public interest, which was involved, to a great extent, in the present inquiry. He should not confine his charge to Mr. Nash only, for he had to bring a serious accusation against one of the principal Ministers of the Crown—the Chancellor of the Exchequer. In the Committee that Right Hon. Gentleman bad exerted his talents and his influence to throw a cloak over the delin quencies of Mr. Nash ; and, instead of discharging the duty of an impartial Judge, be had assumed the character of„ zealous partisan. The House would recollect, that last Session a Select Committee bad been appointed to inquire into the conduct of Mr. Nash, architect and surveyor to the Crown. In 1819, when the improvements in Pal!- mall East and Suffolk-street were in contemplation, Mr. Nash received directions front the Commissioners of Woods and Forests to survey and report upon the Crown lands in that neighbourhood. Shortly arter the Report was made, a person of the name of Edwards, a near rela , ion of Mr. Nash, applied for a large plot of the ground which had been cleared, admitting that he had consulted Mr. Nash upon the subject. Ile finally obtained a grant upon the valuation made by Mr. Nash, and, according to his statement, employed him as his agent to sub-let the ground. Edwards then went abroad for about a year, and on his return, according to the evidence, an interesting scene took place between him and Mr. Nash in the country, in consequence of which he surrendered his interest to Mr. Nash, who in a most friendly manner offered Edwards four thousand five hundred pounds for his bargain (which bar gain Nash had himself made), and for that -sum he became the purchaser. It ought not to be forgotten that during the absence of Mr. Edwards, Mr. Nash had let the plot of ground at improved rents, although he had not laid out a single shilling in the improvement of the property. Having thus become the purchaser for 4,500/., Mr. Nash received no less than 11,600/. in improved ground rents. Thus Mr. Nash himself became the lessee of the Crown, althou g h that fact was not known until three years afterwards, and in the meantime the Office of Woods and Forests supposed that he was acting on behalf of the Crown, in order to let the land to the best advantage. In order to make out a case, Mr. Nash hail brought forward a highly respectable and eminent surveyor and architect, of the name of Shaw, who had also valued the land, and had arrived at nearly the same conclusion as Mr. Nash; but then he omitted a very material circumstance, that this ground, . the rental of which to Mr. Edwards was 9001., was to be held for the three first years at a. pepperconereat e ineleinga as he him , self acknowledged; a difference' of no less than 2;7001. Mr. Shaw had said, as a reason for putting a lower value upon the property, that it was a hazardous speculation ; be (Colonel Davies) denied that it was so, and after the old buildings were once removed, the applications for the ground were numerous. The Noble Lord at the head ef the Woods and Forests had proved himself a most efficient public servant, -and as soon as Le became acquainted with some of the leading facts of the case, he wrote upon the subject to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, objecting to the course that had been pursued, especially to the circum stance that Mr. Nash had become the purchaser from Ed wards, and stating in addition, that the frontage which had been stated by Mr. Nash to be only 82 feet, was, in fact, between 97 and 98 feet. These were points which the Noble Lord had urged ; it was fit that Mr. Nash should be called upon to explain. The discovery of the difference of frontage was made by the Noble Lord him self, who, on coming one day from the University Club, stepped the distance and found that it had been greatly un derstated ; front 1820 to 1829, however, this important variance had escaped notice. It could not be alleged by Mr. Nash that he was ignorant of the true measurement, because the extent of frontage to each house was stated in the margin of each lease he had granted, as the purchaser of the interest from Ed wards. These were the principal outlines of the evi dence ; but he (Colonel Davies) begged to refer the House to the evidence of Mr. Shaw, in which he strongly cen sured the situation in which Mr. Nash had placed him self ; and, in answer to a question, said, that as a broad principle, no agent ought to be allowed to become a patty. Mr. Nash, employed by the Crown, had first become the agent of Edwards, then the purchaser of the grant to Ed. wards, and kept the Crown in complete ignorance of the whole of the transaction. He (Colonel Davies) had found some difficulty in establishing these facts; but they ought te be taken as facts the more readily as they were extorted front reluctant witnesses, and were matters they could not deny, and would willingly have concealed. Even Mr. Milne, the Secretary to the department of Woods and Fo rests, had not given his testimony without considerable repugnance. Having gone through the case as far as re garded Suffolk-street, he would sow proceed to the cir cumstances connected with the grant of Crown Lands in the Regent's Park. If what he had already advanced were worthy of attention, what he was now about to offer was still more deserving notice. About this period of his (Colonel Davies's) statement last Session, a Right Hon. Gent. who was shortly to take his seat as Treasurer of the Navy, moved that the Gallery should he cleared ; the con sequence was, that the Right Hun. Gentleman injured the cause he meant to aid, inasmuch as the first charge he (Colonel Davies) had made, went forth to the public with out an answer. The facts of the case connected with the Regent's Canal were these r—ln 1816 the Committee of that undertaking made application to the Office of Woods and Forests, to obtain a lease of four acres of Crown lands abutting the Regent's ('anal, in consideration of various expences in making a collateral cut, basin, &c. Mr. Nash was at that time a very active Member of the Committee of the Regent's Canal, and being called upon to do so, he made his report to the Commissioners of Woods and Forests, who consequently took the matter into consideration. The Commissioners, in the result, thought and expressed their opinion, that it would be more advantageous to have the Canal Company for te nants instead of an individual, and accordingly it was de termined that the request of the Conip-my should be con ceded. It was suggested, however, that no valid lease could be made with the Company ; and in order to avoid this legal difficulty, the Committee of the Regent's Canal Company consented that the lease should be made out in the name of Mr. Nash. The Commissioners of Woods and Forests believed that the reason fur this change was merely to overcome the legal difficulty, and that Mr. Nash was only to stand forward as the trustee of the Cora p any. The understanding, however, between Nash and the Company was, that he was to he its nominee; and same of the 'Members o' the Company, when examined before the Committee, stated that they thought Mr. Nash had stepped forward to relieve the Company, andnot for his own pecunia , y advantage. Nevertheless, six years afterwards, the Committee of the Canal Company applied for a grant of four more acres ef Crown Land, and the application was signed by Edwards and Lyon, as solicitors for the Company. Strange as it might appear, the Company were iu . no . respect privy to this t request—they knew nothing of it ; e ft *al oi f e t ri i ts r ,tohc i aer t neosp:o l ior t il a iteni i it i iie p :uytr e pei n ei e i.ana i t l ,eit t bi‘a h blesepe a r. Edwards and Lyon,. besides being solicitors to the Cum also tors to Mr. , cLt i p; i l : i ul ' f ( o )lstrd i‘ :r i v i e l a alo r ac e f uen i gay, when in fact it r lesfield before the rets land in the name of tient of Mr. Nash. This fact came out in the evidence of ers of Wuodr anti Nash, singular as it might appear, war required by the circnnsstanees ; and instead of saying, as he aught to have done, I cannot properly report upon a matter in which I am personally interested, he' did execute hie task ; and what was the result of his iuquity ? He recommende4t that the subsisting leases, to which he *so a party, for 50 years, should be extended to 61 years. All this time the Department of Woods and Forests supposed that the leases hail been granted to the Regent's Canal Company ; and five years afterwards, as was evident from the correspond ence, they were in profound ignorance of the real nature of the transaction. The next step was an application fur ther to extend the term of the leases from 61 to 99 years, on the ground that the tenants for the wharfs could not be procured at a shorter term. Such was the allegation at the time; but before the Committee the solicitor for Mr. Nash was obliged to admit that 15 out of 17 wl arfs had been let for terms not exceeding LI sears. Upon these wharfs Mr. Nash had not been at the Expence of a single shilling beyond the walling of the Canal Basin, which was, in fact, paid for iu °thee nays. The case then stood thus the first seventeen years of the term it was stipulated that Mr. Nash should pay for the what fs on rent of 541. les., and what was the amount he actually received from his tenants for the same wharfs ?—No less than 1.6981., leaving him, therefore, a char profit of 1,643/. 6s. Fur the next seven years he was to pay 6W., so that his profit would only be reduced to 1,635/. For the next fourteen years his rent to the Crowe was to be 6341., and he would consequently gain 1,064/. 'hiring that period. For the remainder of the term the rent to the Crown was raised to 1,321/. Isy which his profit would be reduced to 3771. per annum. This extraordinary advantage had been obtained, as he (Colunel Davies) con tended, on false pretences, Mr. Nash having taken advan tage of the situation he fill.d and of the influence he en joyed. Under these circumstance he put it to the Law Officers of the Crown whether loans so obtained were valid, and though no lawyer, he would venture to ass er t that they might be set aside. He had only one further cir cumstance to mention. It was the duty of M:. N tsl,, es surveyor and architect of the Crown, to take care that all the building mates ials used were most substantial. The Com mittee charged Mr. Nash not with fraud—they said there was nothing in the evidence kid before them to raise a doubt of his integrity e but Mr. Nish himself afforded the fullest evidence that, he had been guilty of fraud ; be_sold bricks at sixteen shillings a thousand as bricks of the best quality, and those intended for Cursitor-street be used iu Regent-street, though they were of an inferior quality, and though it was stipulated that none but those of the higher qualities should be used in the latter. There was no one who thought proper to take the trouble of looking from the back windows of the University Cluh-house, who might sot see one of the must extraordinary pieces of patchwork that ever had been dignified with the name of architecture. Again, Mr. Nash was paid for reporting spun his own work ; it was also in evidence that he first got four acres of ground, and then eight; and disposed of that land at a profit of 1,6431., and that was effected ender false pre teuces. The Hon. and Gallaut Member then proceeded to read from the Report of the Committee its Resolution, stating that there was no ground laid before the CORI. teittee for impeaching the integrity of Mr. .Nash.—(Haar, hear.)—Now, should the Chancellor of the Exchequer job in the public funds as Mr. Nash la jobbed in the public land, what would the House think of it ? Yet the whole conduct of the Chancellor of the Exchequer was that of a partisan—yes ; through every stage of the proceedings directed against Mr. Nash, the Right Hon. Gentleman threw around him the shield of Ministerial influence. He defied the Right Hon. Gentletnau er any of his hien& to show that a single question had been put by the Chan cellor of the Exchequer which had not, or did riot at least appear to have, for its object to screen Mr. Nash. Cer tain charges, as the House knees, hail been brought be fore the House last year, but they did not amount to one tenth of time evidence that he now adduced. If the House could be induced to grant a new Committee, lie (Colonel Davies) hail pledged himself to the House that he could throw much new light upes the wetter which bad been referred to the former Committee ; and he had no ?auk that the result of that further information would be that the House could then have little difficulty in cuming to a resolution to agree to an address fur the remov 1 of Mr, Nash, from his present situation. Would it be believed, that in a time like the present, when the cry of distress was universal through the land, that anything like the show of defence could be set up for conduct like that of Mr. Nash ? Could the cry of economy now proceeding from every quarter be stopped by a Ministerial majority ? Was the present a time when such. jobs as those which Lo then endeavoured to denounce, would be tolerated by a _ - swiferingpeaple? - cone:hided by sauteing, that. a Select Committee he appointed tbinquireidtatheeonduet-of Mr. Nash with respect to the Crown Laads in the eutmty of Middlesex. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said that last year the Honourable and Gallant Officer hod made some hardy assertions which were certainly not borne out by the evidence laid before the Committee, and by thiere sults attendant upon those assertions they could judge how iar his assertions of this year were to Le regarded. Every nint at variance who attended h tthpasteas sertions Committee v teinsistre with th have seen e how ufacts. The Hon. and Gallant Member had thought proper to charge him (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) with de fending Mr. Nash at the extreme of integrity, honour, and every principle which should gevern the conduct of a pub.. lie man.—(No, no, no.)—Yes, he told the Rouse that he (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) had throughout acted like a partiztn—ptocceded us he was determined, Tight or wring, to carry Mr. Nash throsigh, and that in the most improper and corrupt manner ; that was langneee which the Hon. Member was not entitled to apply to him love where else except in that House ; hat thoac who heard it would judge such language by the former unproved asser tions of the Hoe. Member; and by those unproved state ments of his they would judge how far it was likely that, if granted a new Committee, he would succeed in laying before them charges ten times us great and important as those preferred last year. As to the charges made against himself, of partisanship and improper support of Mr. Nash, lie was sure the House would do him the justice to believe that his sole objsct was to do his duty to the peddle en the one hand, and to the individual accused on the other. Influenced by a motive such as that, he had earefully attended to the evidence ou both sides ; and having ar rived ut a different conclusion from the Honourable Mem her, he certainly felt hound to propose to the Committee a resolution expressive of the view which he took of the subject generally, and of the conduct of Mr. Nash ; and he should most certainly defend that reseilution, without, being deterred by any threat or by ally imputation that might he attempted to be thrown upon his honour or On. racter. Such imputations, be confesaed, wane upon hint as a m fitter of complete surprise was perfectly un aware that'the lion. Member meant to make his conduct a subject of accusation. If he thought that accusation could have any weight with the House, Le could satisfy them, as lie had satisfied the Committee, that the views he took of the conduct of Mr. Nash were perfectly cur rect. The House had sntertained charges aj,aiust Mr. Nash ; had appointed a Committee to inquire into those charges ; would they then, at the instance of a minority of that Committee, re-try the same individual on the sein e eliargee ? The Hon. Member had charged him (40 Chancellor of the Exchequer) with being a part4e. Mr. Nash, and with endeavouring to secure his esquittal sa.ntinst justice, and against the sense of the Committee. How could he, proposing a monition in that Committee 4 carry it against the sense of the members of that Commits.- tee ? He selected that Cuumentec—(No, ne.)—sHow could lie suppose that a person opposed to him *maid him) any success? In saying that the Hon. Member selectee! that Committee, he merely meaut that he hat! choaen them as the persons most likely to judge fairly, and most capable of coming to a sound dickies ; that they were amongst the fittest that could be chosen, and the least 1 kely to Le under the influence of Government, could even, by roc ference to their names, many of them even iseclnd4h. the names of the Honourable Member's own frieuds ; It had been said that he came down . to the Commit, tee with a resolution ready drawn op, exculpatory of 311.. Nash, and that he came down determined to force it upon the Committee ; yet the filets were opposed to that, for the resolution was not ;treed to till after considerable discussiou. Again, no. Committee, could be found less affected in his la% our by political twee judicess—if they could be supposed to have any weight In an inquiry wherein the question was one htfecting the honour and character of an individual. Here was a geu, tletnan tried and acquitted before a Committee and if ti new Committee were to be appointed to du the work of • the former Committee over again, in that 'way Mr. Nash might be hunted session alter sees ion, until the most un just decision were at length arrive'. at. Tie snore espe cially was the House bound to resist the present motion, considering the state of health of the individual in question when that state was such as made it extremely doubtful whether or not it would he in his power to attend the sittings of the Committee. Finely, he had only to add, that if any honourable Member besides the Mover thought him capable of ell that had been charged against him, he hoped thet such a sentiment might be openly steed, for then, though not till then, he should feel it necessary n a cuter at length into the evidence and proceediega c.l' e he Committee, for the eurpose of removing any such iroyees sion. Thus much only should he saty, that he never had the slightest knowledge of Mr. Nark tilt he entered upon, his present situation. Wit 4 41, w phierrations Ise