The Sun. — London, England, 1842-05-31 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. 110118 E OF LORDS. Mq n:4! LORD CHANCELLOR WO: ills t.4ettt on the Wool -44K:1; at the usual hour. Earl of I(OSEBERY preiented, for the Marquis of lireadalbaue, 'several petitions on the subject of the Chureli of Scotland. from different parts of Scotland. Lord LORTON presented petiiionr: in favour of the Clim,h Education S. wiety, from tiiffilvnt parts of In.laud. Thy Marquis of LANSDOWNE presented a petition from Bristol on the suhjeccor Roman Catholic grievances. MESSAGE FROM THE COMMONS. Mr. I.vALl,Und others brought.. up the Indemnity. Mutual Marine Assurance Bill, which was read a first, and ordered to be 1%.:t.i a second time to-morrow. Th, Earl of GLENGALL moved air returns of the alrowances, expenses, &c.. of the Poor-law ConrlL:Aion in Ireimd.--Agreed t o . • DISTURBANCES IN TIPPERARY.. The NonLE Emit.. .said he would take that opportunity of Making Ft few observations with respect to the disturbances that li;:d occurred so frequently in :he N o rth Hiding of the comuy of Tipperary. lie not ~have troubled their Lordships but that be felt some Itiarm.would he created frdm some words that hid a Noble Friend of his, who held a high situa tion in-the Government (Lord Wharnelitie, as we linter stood). He was afraid that some misconception might art;r from the words used among the petty landlords in timt etamtev. Now of this he was ei•rtain, that in the iloytk TiPperary then- was Ito pretext whatever for the ottcr,;e.4 that had mken place, either from the c.n duet 40' the print info or the petty landlords ; yet he Intl,t , Vo/lf, CS LllfiL the SCIIIO Or that county was worse that he had ever nvoilected it for the last twenty-five y u-ars. Murner had been committed :Awn. every day, and such was cite plate of thing.; that the Magistrates apprehended an outbreak. To such an extent was intimidation carried, that in one instance a man dared not let his h.tu,e f, , r a ptliee-shltion. With respect to the 7 , :rnil landlords, he might mention the case of Mr. Hail, who was so barbarously murdered ; and there was not the slightest evidence that he had acted harshly to ltis tenants. In fact, there was a general eons?iracy against the law of the land, and against all social . - order in that county. With respect to the larger . landlords, there was the case .of Lord , Norbury, who was murdered because he only wanted to increase the size of his farms, and had paid well those tenants whom he required to quit. Some of the hest landlords in Ireland had been perse cuted in a. most uncalled for manner ; and what lie would ask was the cause of all this ? Why, becatt,e there was an impunity for crime. There was no punislunent for crime, and the result was that vt it ites3ses could not be got to give evidence, •or jurors to do their duty, because, if they did, they were sure to be murdered. Such was the staie of that county that murderers—persons km urn to he inurfierers were walking abroad because jurors could not be found to convict them. Oat. of these 3,905, only 107 had been convicted. He had taken the four large counties of England arid com pared these to the same number of counties in Ireland, atul he found that in England two-thirds of the parties anc4:sed were convicted, hut in Ireland two•thirds Were acquitted. He wondered that, it was not much more itoesiderable, considering the way in which the people were incited. One weird about the priests. He was gratified to learn that two gentlemen, respectable a, t!: lie clergymen, had come forward to denounce this spume They had called on their congregation to leave iiiA syAtem, ieh it was high time for them to do. They kuew that it they had not dune so that the whole of the Nei-th Riding of the county of Tipperary would have })ern iu a state of insurrection, as it had been in 1798. He hoped the other Catholic clergy men would follow their example. Who were tee c•st persons at the hustings and registries ? Why; the agitating and youthful priests, not the respect able class of priests. Who were the persons that gut up the rove:11 meetings and headed registration ? Why, youthful priests. While he was on this subject he would mention one circumstance. The money that was sent front the Sympathisers in America was sent, riot for the Repeal Associations, but because they thought recourse was to be had to arms, and they were very much disappointed to find that the money lead been otherwise expended. He hoped that the young priests would take warning and stop in time. • He would beg of them to reflect on the revolution which had been brought on the Catholic Church. Look at the United . 4 :sites of Holland, and look at England. Look at Spain at the present moment. lie hived, therefore, the young priests would take warning. He concluded by moving tor a. return of all rewards offered for the apprehenSion ef critninals. Lord WHARSCLIFFE remarked that what he had said in the Committee upon which he sat. was, that there were persons in Ireland who used the privileges of pro .l;ertv harshly, but he also st a t e d th a t h e w as g l a d t o find' the improving state of landlord and tenant in Ireland. The state of agitation which Ireland had been in for a long time rendered it difficult to apprehend Criminals. The Marquis of NORMANBY said that what he had stated was, that the convictions had increased in proportion to the committais, and that committals had increased in proportion to the number of rewards. lie aitihed to State that, lest he might be supposed to acqui esce in the whole of the statements of the Noble Lon?. With rt gard to the Catholic priests, he must say that from that body he had received considerable assistance when he v%a'S exercising the functions of Lord-Lieute nant of Ireland. This had also been stated by the No ble Lord the present Secretary for Ireland. Earl rowrEscuE said, he could not agree with what had fallen front the Noble Earl. From what he tg!;,l ohs-rved. he could state that the number of bond cides had decreased in Ireland fir several years fifty per annum. There might be persons in holy orders in Ire land, e.ho had acted indiscreetly, but he must say, •that he was in Ireland, there was no class of men from ri bout be had received greater assistance than the Catholic clergy. The "Marquis of CLANRICARDE thought that con siderable bane was to be attached to the constabulary Of Inland, for - they wholly neglected whole neigh bt,urho6ds. He thought it would • he an cosy taA; at the beginning of winter, to aseer t4lits where arms were secreted. lie could not agree with the Noble Lord in saying that crime was attendant upon agitation. • The'Earl of GLENGALL said that the Noble Earl iausv bane forgotten what Lord ‘Velleslcy had said. lie always said that he could not separate crime from agita tion. Let - them look to the late election for Tipperary. where persons were prevented from voting, and if they atteupted to vote they endangered their lives. Lord CLONCLAIRY said he was willing to admit that there were agitators amongst the young.clergy of Ireland, but the general body of the clergy were excm ',hay characters. • 'lnc Marquis of DOWNSTI IRE had a very great re spect for the Catholic clergy in. Ireland, but he drew t4reat distinction between those who attended to s.puitual duties,. and thee who devoted their whole .we to politics.—(Rear, hear, hear.) Ile must say that ao taro had more strenously endeavoured tef do juldiee to ail, and to uphold their cientry, than the Magistracy of Ireland.—(ilear, hoar.) LORTO.N said the priests were the principal advm.ates for the Repeal of the Union. The motion was then agreed to. - • PRISON DISCIPLIFE.. WiIARNCLIFFE said that as there was a i dif- Skutt). n •at present laying on the table the Report tnov.d for by the Noble Lord opposite (Colborn) rY siuv•{ing prison discipline, he hoped the Noble - Lord Noilld not press his motion at present. Lord CoLOORNE consented to withdraw his motion. The Fine!, anti Recoveries (Woks and Cheshire NN - 01( thcough Committee. QUEEN'S LETTER. WIIAIINt.:LIFFE laid on the table a copy or the Queeki's Letter to the Clergy, ort the subject of the iiiktre , . the country. The Duke ot InCtIiMOND presetited a petitical again At eercaili eiatefes in the Liverpoui Pollee and Impro;✓euirnt 11111. NEWGATE. The. Marquis of ClthNlilt.).A.l-:ol:: . gave "'olive that, to-moo :.tov he should in. for a copy of the regulations the gaol 'i Ni-%%gate with resreet tocriininuls tunics sentence for c:lpit al of}; nets. He thought it his duty, that. no o:ln,r lay or elcrieal Lord had done so, tna!«., this motioo, iu con,a•qutaice of late scenes which had taken htee,' ai;d which were most disgraceful. JURISDICTION OF JUSTICES BILL Ttw LORD t.:IIANC '..LOR ro , e to move the second rllidin g ,, of this Bill. After recapitulating the various provisions of the Bill. the Noble Lord said that, as the Lord (Godolphin) had a Bill on the subjert on the table, he could either move the second rvading then, or he could engraft some of the clauses of his Bill on the pre sent 04e m emlit4ltee. Ifthe Noble Lord wished to make any alteration in the provisions of the Lill he (the Lord ch ance llor) would be tnt,,t 11 , ,,ppy to take them into his con iideration before going in to Com m i t ti,„ Lord Li°DL OPH v IN wit, undersod to sttY that he should make several amendment s in Committee. After a s h o rt conversation, the Bill was read a second time. THE ATTEMPT ON HER MAJESTY'S LIFE. The kir' of GA I.LO\Y 111 here ros e to pr pfrit.oq, but b,:ftwe the Nohlo Earl could ' i s"l do s:: the House was thrown into great excitem;nn' and alarm, by the intelligence being brought of tint direful attack upon her Most Gracious Majesty. 'file Bins up-,o the taidv were hastily forwarded a stagc, and their Lordships immediutyly adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMON S, 31(q; The SiP ixErt took the C'tair at the usual hour. LYME REGIS. Mr. HAWEti br , .1;;;!11 thU i•Tort of . the ( i %"l n n r ; mittee- selected to rry the petition Complainingrt . 14. undue r e t urn f or th e bo roug h o f tyMe Regis. Report stated that William Penney, Esq., was ) 7 duly electeti serve in the present Parliament vs Member for the borough of Lyme Regis, and tio.t Thomas Hussey, Esq., was oh:cted, and ought to Imve been returned. The Committee also unanimon,ly came to the following resolution That though the gemor..: charge of bribery alleged •to have been co::.- mitred at the _elections had not been gone yot that it appeared in evidence, in the course of the scrutiny, 'that a corrupt practice of lending money on bilk of sale, notes of hand, and other securities, had prevailed, and that as the number of voters appeared by the last registration to amount to only 280. a practice so corrupt was peculiarly adapted to interfere with the honest exercise of the franchise in so small a constituency, and they begged to call the serious attention of the "louse to the subject."—(Hear.) The Hon. Member then moved that the evidence be printed to-morrnw. CA MBUSLANG AND MUIRKIREI ROAD. Mr. LOCKHART moved the third reading of the Mr. MACKENZIE moved the postponement of the Bill till this day week. . After, a short- discussion, in which Mr. Dennistott, Mr. Mackeniie, Mr. Darby, Mr. P. M. Stewart; and Lord G. Sotnerset took place, the third reading of the Bill was postponed till to-morrow. • , GENERAL TURNPIKE BILL. Mr. HAWES presented three petitions against the General Turnpike Bill. HILL COOLIES: The Hom. MEMBER also presented four petitions from the Anti Corn-law Society of Durham, from Streud,from Southampton, and from the Ross Anti-Slavery Society, against the importation of Hill Coolies. GAER'S NATURALIZATION BILL. On the motion of . Mr. THORNELY this Bill was read a second time. PETITIONS. Mr. R. YORKE presented a petition from the city of York, signed by upwards of 3,500 persons of all parties, against the New Poor-law Amendment Bill. Sir T. HANMER presented a . petition, numerously signed. from the publicans of Hull, against the clause propoced in the Public-houses Bill by Mr. Pakington. Sir H. DOUGLAS presented a petition from New Brunswick against the proposed alterations in the duties on foreigi and colonial world ; also against the Customs Duties, as applied to British colqpial possessions. Sir A. GRANT presented a petition from the attor neys and solicitors of Cambridge againt the annual certi ficate duty. Mr. LITTON presented a petition from the county of Down (Ireland) praying that Biblical edticaticu might h. promoted in dint country. Tit UCK SYSTEM. Mr. FERRAND presented a petition from eighty-lour labourers in Wales, stating their regret at hearing tlu.t an lion. Member of that House bad been in their neigh bourhood getting signatures to a document which pur ported to he a declaration of theirs in favour of the truck system. They begged io inform the House that they had no market town there, :and yet they could buy their articles 15 per cent. cheaper than at the truck shops; but even if they could not do so, they wished to be allowed to purchase their articles at the cheapest market. In conclusion, they begged the House to take some strung measure -to ,put down the truck system for ever. He (Mr. Ferrand) begged leave to move that this petition be referred to the Committee on Wages. Dr. BOWRING said, that on that motion he might be allowed to say a few words. It was perfectly true that he had been in the neighbourhood alluded to, and it was per fectly true that he hnd been speaking to the workmen in the Campion works. He asked them what was their opinion %%WI respect t-e the truck system. They said that from it some of them experienced much benefit. They also said that - several of the workmen had been induced to sign a petition against the system, but they - had since expressed great n.g,ret at having done so. They all believed • that a small shop conducted on the truck system was bad, but if it was conducted by a large company, it contributed to the general happiness and comfort of the district. Mr. T. DUNCOMBE presented a petition from the Board of Guardians of Hereford against the Poor-law Bill. Lord BERNARD presented a petition from Cork, against the present system of National Education in Ireland. Mr. LEFROY presented a petition to the same effect from a place in Ireland. Mr. ROEBUCK wesented a petition from a person, named Williams, praying that the system of canvassing at elections should be abolished ; also a petition from a person named Barnes, of Brighton. The petitioner stated that great bribery bad taken place, at the election for Brighton, and that the Marquis of Bristol was one of the parties so offending. The petitioner prayed that the ballot might become law. ELECTION PETITIONS-WARNSTAPLE ; DUBLIN. The SPEAKER acquainted the House that he had received notice from the agents and parties to the peti tion complaining of an undue election and return for the borough of Barnstaple, that they did not intend to pro ceed with that petition. He had also received notice from the agents of the petition complaining of the rettirn! for the county and city of Dublin, that the petition would not be proceeded with. POOR-LAWS. Lord WORSLEY presented petitions from places in Yorkshire, praying for alterations and amendments in the Poor-law Bill. NOTICES OF MOTION.—DISTRESS IN PAISLEY. Dr. BOWRING said he had been requested by his Hon. Friend, the Member for Greenock, to give notice that on Monday the 7th of June, he should move for a copy of all correspondence that had taken place beta eon the Magistrates and Ministers of .Renfrewsl ire end the Rome Department, on the subject of the distress at Paisley ; also for copies of any representation that had been made of that dis tress, and of any orders or instructions that had been given by the Home Secretary upon them ; also for an account of the money that had been placed at the disposal of the local Commissioners, or for any reports made by medical men, referring to the distress in that district. He also gave notice, that the Member for Greenock intended on the 21st of June to call the at tention of the House to the distress prevailing among the lower classes generally. COASTING TRADE. Sir C. NAPIER gave notice that he should move for a return of the number of vessels engaged in the coast ing trade. Mr. HODGSON HINDE gave notice that, on Thurs day next, he should move for a Select Committee to in quire into the subject of Post-office communication. GRAND JURIES (IRELAND). Mr. O'CONNELL said thatjte found there had been a Report in print upon the subject of Grand Juries in Ireland, suggesting several legislative measures for the improvement of their proceedings. He wished to a,k the Noble Lord, the Secretary fbr Ireland, whether it was the intention of her Majesty's Government to act upon the Report, by bringing in a Bill, during the present Session,. Lord ELIOT said that the Government had as yet come to no determination upon the subject. - - BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE. -: Sir R. PEEL rose and said that he had given 'notice some time since that he should on that day move the third reading of the Income-tax Bill ; and the general impression of Hon. Members was that on that day the notice of the House would be called to that important subject. It was of very great importance' that if the House was prepared to give its assent to the measure, the Government should • have time for snaking those preliminary arrangements, which would be absolutely necessary for carrying the law into operation. He hoped, therefore, that no question, even of privilege, would be brought forward that evening - to prevent the consideration of the Income-tax, and that he should he allowed, at the usual time of proceeding with the public business, to move the third roasting of the Bill. Mr. MACKIN . NON, having . already given notice of his intention to ,move for the issuing of a new writ for Southampton, felt himself placed in an awkward sin/n -th:in. After the appeal of the Right*Hon. Baronet he would, however, postpone his motion to Wednesday nem. Sir ROBERT PEEL trusted that no other 11,,e, Member would interpose to prevent hisproceeding with the third reading of the Property-tax Bill. Mr. T. DUNCOMBE said the Poor-law Act Cotiti nuar.ee Bill stood for discussion to-morrow. lie wished to know whether that Bill would be proceudeu With, or whether the Right Her.. Baronet would claim. precedence for the tariff. Sir R. PEEL said that he promised to-morrow to give precedence to - Ills Noble Friend (Lord Ashley), who had been disappointed on a previous occasion. lie did not suppose that the discussion on the Nob!i2 Lord's Bill would be a very lengthened one. When that was over he must claim precedence for the tariff. Immediately after the tariff should be disposed of he would take the Poonlaw Amendment Act. Mr. ROEBUCK hoped he might be permitted ;o have precedence for his Bill, which was among the Orders of the Day. Ile was suffering from indispOsition, and he therefore trusted the Right Hon. Baronet would n4,t refuse him precedence. Sir ROBERT PEEL would not object to give the lion. and Learned Alaisber precedence, as he grounded his appeal on the plea' of personal indisposition, ' if it were understocd that no discussion was to take place on the sukect—unless- that were the understanding, he could not give way. Mr; ()TON NEEL had a notice on the 'paper relative to one of, the clauses of. the Bill, Sir ROBERT I N GLIS was,opposed to the Bill. Sic J. EAbTlicipq said that he perceived the Hon. Memher for South Shrepshire had a notice of motion on the paper respecting this stkeet, and he wished to kbow when he woul,l bring it forward ? Mr. FLEMING spoke in so low a tone of voice that we could not learn the nature of his reply. BRlBERY.—pgrrrioN OF MR. WRENN. Mr. T. DUNCONIBE then presented a petition from John Wrenn, praying that a further inquiry may be in stituted into the bribery that took place at Southamp ton. The Hon. Member then moved that the petition be printed ivith the Votes. The SPEAKER said that the petition could not be printed with the Votes. unless notice were given, and the petition referred to the general Committee on Petitions. Mr. W. 0. STANLEY said he thought the petition ought to be in the hands of lion. Members. He had read. I the petition, and it stated that if indemnity were granted to witnesses, .he could disclose the most extensive acts of bribery, not only at the last election, bu: also at forme r elections. .Mr. 'MACKINNON. observed, in answer to what had fallen from the Hon. Member who had just sat dim n, that this petition was from the very man who had so inediehaved himself before the Committee, and he appeul , ,d to the good sense of the House whether the - a petition from nN Standing Ord ers o f the Muse lhould he violated, for rho purpose of r ec ei v i ng en I-uial, w • hereby hi s n evidence before the Corn mittee Was, not to be belie ved. After a few words from Mr. REDINGTON, ( great imp or t ance t o a d- Sir R. PEEL thought it o f here generally to the established rules of the House. With respect to the character of the individual referred to, they should hQ able to judge of it when they saw the bearing upon th e quest i on of bribery pe tition printed. It was stated that th e pet i tion contained elections, and he (Si r R. P eel) di d , a u rt t h e e rh s il o a u l t l h e a g m at p ii t u o t n s , therefore certainly think that it was a case in %hich the operation of the rule ought to be suspended, Mr. O'CONNELL—And that misconduct alleged t o be committed by the petitioner consisted of protecting himself against answering. He now came forward and said that if they would indemnify him he would make disclosures. It was manifest by the p et i. tioner's evidence that he was capable of making such disclosures, as he had been one of the most active persons during the elections. There wa s no doubt that he had a full knowledge of everything that had oe. eurred. Mr. T. DUNCOMBE had presented the petition merely for the purpose of saving the time of the House, rHE SUN, LONDON, TUESDAY!' MORNING, MAY 31, 1842. causes of complaint with regard to the mode of electing the Members of this. House shall be first redressed." Mr. O'CONNELL Seconded the motion. Sir ROBERT PEEL hoped the lion. Gentle man would not charge him (Sir Robert I eel) with treating him with disrespect if he de clined entering into the discussion which his motion and his speech seemed calculated to provoke. —, (Hear, hear.) The 'Hon. Gentleman had brought forward a motion of a somewhat similar character a few nights since ; that motion had been fully discussed, and on that occasion he (Sir R. Peel) had stated the reasons which had induced him to come to a conclusion diametrically opposed to the conclusion which hail been come to by the Honourable Gentieman. The present proposal' of the Ron. Gentleman went even unt further until his former proposal had gone. The Hon. Gentleman now contended that the 'House of Commons was absolutely disqualified t om performing any of its constitutional functions.--(Hear, hear.) If it was not at liberty to propose an income-tax ; it could surely hardly be at liberty to refuse the taritf.—(liear, hear, and cheers.) It was disqualified ,from performing any constitutional functions, and an immediate close ought to be put to the business of the session. But there was one question, which even those Who %%ere most anxious i'or Parliamentary Reform ought to • ask themselves before voting for the present motion. If the }louse were thus disqualified from the performance of all its consti tutional function , , had it the power to reform itself? lie thought, considering all the circumstances, that there were good grounds for opposing the motion of the lion. Gentleman, and those grounds had been fully stated the other evening Be hoped he should be excu s ed . From entering into the discussion on the pre'. sent occasion, as it appeared to him that the motion rather related to larliawentary Reforrn than to the Income tax. The lion. Member professed a great regard for the Working classes, and he (Sir R. Peel) would remind the Hon. Gentleman that the financial measures of the Govern ment, more especially this one of an income-tax, were cal culated to atfbrd those classes great relief, by transferring the burden of taxation front them to the upper orders of society. lie trusted the lion.' Member would not•con :Sider that he (Sir Robert Peel) was treating him (Mr. Sharman Crawford' with any disrespect if he declined entering anew into the discussion of the question of Parliamentary Reform.—(Loud cheering.) • Mr. O'CONNELL admitted that the best mode of discussing the question brought forward ''''''' Honourable Friend, would be as a distinct n4O - ; but if the Government did not do justice to lion. Members, if they refused extension of the suffrage, Hon. Members might find themselves bound to offer more obstructions to the Government * than they had hitherto done. Mr. HUME had no hesitation in agreeing with Hon. Members that the House did not represent Ihe people of the country, or the Members who sat there their opinions ; but he thought they were placed in this dif ficulty, that they were not able to get a direct negative or affirmative to the question. lie could nc.t agree with the Income-tax, and was desirous of giving a direct negative to that, as he believed that other measures might be proposed. Every hour brought new proof that the measures proposed were only palliative. The people wanted employment and food, which they might have, if they could get employment. The House by the laws it had passed, and which were now to be continued, had placed a whole community under the ban of starvation, till there was .ti revival of trade, which never could take place till they could have a free exchange with other countries. The House had no feeling with the people, and all its acts were in support of monopoly. He should support the motion of his Hon. Friend, and he would oppose the third reading of the Bill in every way he po.sibly could. Lord J. MANNERS opposed the amendment. He believed it originated with the Society for the Extension of Parliamentary Reform. Lord J.'RUSSELL said that the resolution would in. capacitate the House from entering into any legislation whatever. He should certainly vote against the amend— ment. Strangers were then ordered to withdraw, and the House divided, when the numbers were— For the motion Against it 156 Majority THE ATTEMPT ON HER MAJESTY'S LIM Mr. BARING here rose to bring forward the motion of which he had given notice, when of the successive annual additions to the body of the clergy, ought to be not only sound in doctrine, but free from suspicion. A statute was accordingly r.zssed unfavourable to the Rev. Gentleman's appoinkineii:. His case was a difficult one; he could not retract Opinions which in truth he never held, and the same inexperience which led him into equivocal expres sions in the passages of his sermons objected to, pro bably disabled him from explaining ,them ; if even a remnant of human pride would permit him to explain, in answer to a charge which. he knew to be un just, and which he believed to be hasty. Under these circumstances Dr. Hampden assumed the ply , - fessor's chair, with the manly resolution, as it appears of setting himself right with the University and the country rather by his conduct than by explanation or apology. For six years lie has occupied that chair to the entire satisfaction, as we have heard, of the Uni versity, and to the great advantage of the young men whom it was his duty to instruct. The Heads of the University have, therefore, resolved to do themselves and Dr. Hampden the justice of repealing the statute of 1836, passed while he allowed himself to be misunderstood. One would think so plain an act of justice . would be received with satisfaction by a ll generous men. A party has, - however, arisen to obstruct thegeneral har mony, and that.party is the party of Doctor Pusey and. Mr. Newman. There can be no doubt what will be the result of an attempt to prove Doctor Hampden an unfit' lecturer, without being able to adduce even one doubtful sentence from his six years' lectures. But it is not against Doctor Hampden, it is against the Church and the Protestant religion that the pre sent movement is directed. I COURIER.—If ever a public man had reason to exclaim " save me from my friends," it is the ex- Member for Bridport, and present pretender •to purism, after the disgraceful disclosures made on Fri day night, and all of which he brought upon himself. Truly he must have been in the hand's of very injudi dons friends, else he would, at all hazards, have avoided publishing to the world his own shame, and pro claiming to the nation at large the hollowness of his pretensions to political purity. It is in vain that Sir T. Wilde exerts all his powers of special pleading in behalf of his friend, Mr. Warburton—in vain that he endeavours, by means of his forensic skill, to gloss over the transactions in which that ex-Honourable Member (for we beg to assure Mr. Warburton that he now stands in the position of a man who has for feited more than his seat) was engaged, and of which he appeared to be the prime mover; in vain that that able, though not we believe very scrupulous, debater, twists and tortures evidence with the view of white washing the immaculate and bribery-hating Mr. War burton, as sufficient has already appeared to fix on him not only the knowledge of, but a participation in, most discreditable proceedings. Without presum ing in any way to prejudge the merits of the dispute, as affecting the respective parties thereto, or in any way to anticipate the course the inquiry may take, enough in our opinion was stated to show that, from beginning to end of the negotiation which ended in this open rupture, Mr. Warburton's conduct was marked by disingenuousness, hypocrisy, and intrigue. ELECTION COMMITTEE. LYME REGIS. CLOSE OF THE INQUIRY. The Committee met yesterday at twelve o'clock, accord ing to the adjournment of Saturday. Shortly after the opening of the business the Counsel for the sitting Member stated that Mr. Penney declined continuing the contest. The decision of the CoMmittee on the last votes that were inquired into has led to this resolution. The protracted inquiry on this petition, which has lasted twenty days, caused great dissatitfaction he witnesses, who found their detention in London e\- remely inconvenient. LAW INTELLIGENCE. ROLLS' COURT, May 30. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. THE MERCHANT 'VENTURERS' SOCIETY OF BRISTOL. for if lie had not presented it now, he should have done scum Wednesday next, when a considerable • diScussion would no doubt . have ensued. They would find in that petition,. that so far from Wrenn not having spoken the truth, the. charge was that he had spoken tco much of the truth, and that he was now in conse quence placarded all over Southampton as having betrayed his party ; and the public were now cautioned against dealing with that individual, in consequence of what he had stated. The petitioner further stated that he had not stated one-tenth of the transactions which be knew to have oc curred at the elections, and that he had a book in which the several sums of money expended in bribery were set down. If they resisted the printing of this pe tition, and would not receive the information which teas now offered them through that petition, he (Mr. DO wanted to know what the public would think of the transac tion? Hewould repeat what he had said before, that if that petition was printed, he did not believe an lion. Member would be found on either side of the House who would get up and ask the House to issue a writ for the borough of Southampton. Mr. FILMING said that Mr, Wrenn had not only told all that be knew, out a great deal more.—(A laugh.) If the House wished to know the character of Mr. Wrenn, he would read to them a letter. The Hon. MeMber was then proceeding to read a letter, when, Mr. T. DUNCOMBE rose to order—lf that letter was to be read, the petition ought to be read fir St. Mr. FLEMING said the letter merely related to the charam er of John Wrenn. It was addressed to himself, and stated that in an interview with John Wrenn, some time since, the writer remarked that he did not consider that an individual, named in the case as about to be heard before the Insolvent Court, would pass his examination if he spoke the truth ; upon which Wrenn answered that he should not speak the truth on such an occasion, and as to un oath, he did not value an oath, he would swear thick and • thin to get himself through the Court in similar circumstances, or words to that effect. The letter (said the Hon. Member) was signed by Robert Donkin, a respectable tailor in Southampton. Mr. WARD contended that when a witness came be fore the House tendering intOrmation, an Hon. Member had no right to read statements to blacken his character. He believed the Hon. Member would have quite enough to do to defend his own conduct.----s(Cries of " Order.") Mr: BARING said as the lion. Member for Finsbury had statedlhat Wrenn Was a respectable tradesman, he (Mr. Baritig) felt that he had a perfect right to state that a greater vagabond did not exist.—(Hear.) Mr. FLEMING said, he had received another letter on the same subject, in which the writer stated that the evidence given by John Wrenn before the Southampton Committee, respecting a voter named Whitntarsh, was wholly untrue. Sir J. EASTHOPE thought it was very clear that the evidence of this John Wrenn, whose character was so strongly impugned by the Hon. Gentleman opposite, and who was represented as one of the greatest vagabonds in the country, was a very great Conservative of Southatnp ton' and had not been considered so great a vagabond, for he had been taken into the Conservative corps ; he had much confidence reposed in him, and had been a great agent on that side of the question; whatever odium, therefore, attached to his character, there was no doubt the Hon. Gentlemen would be glad to get rid of it. Mr. WARD said it appeared that Wrenn was in the possession of a memorandum book, not produced before the Committee, which co stained an account of sums of money with which certain electors had been bribed, and containing also the signature of the returning officer, authorising the bribing of a certain elector, which elector was bribed. accordingly. It was quite obvious that this petition must be printed, •and come before the House, before it could purstte.the -proceedings with respect to bribery. Those proceedings would become an absolute farce, if, when a man was knocking at their door, and offering to produce. such evidence, they should re fuse to hear him . : • • • Sir R. PEEL 'was; understood to say that there were grounds fof — phlititing the petition. He said that he thought there were particular circumstances in the case, under 'Alai it would not be expedient to apply the strict rule in reference to printing petitions. Mr. W. STANLEY and Mr. MAcairestort then attempted to address the House, but were unable to obtain a hear ing, amidst the loud cries of " Spoke " and " Order." The motion that the petition be printed was then put and agreed to, Mr. MACKINNON having stated that he should withdraw his opposition. WITNESSES INDEMNITY BILL. On the motion of Mr. ROEBUCK, the House resolved itself into a Committee on the Witnesses' Indemnity Bill, 1 1 Mr. WARD in the Chair. The Bill then- went through Committee ; certain ver bal amendments were agreed to; the Report was brought up; and the Bill, as amended, was ordered to be printed. PROPERTY-TAX BILL. Mr. HUME, since he had given notice of a motion on the subject of the third reading of this Bill, had been in formed that he would be precluded by a sessional order from bringing that motion forward. He would therefore postpone it to some future opportunity. COMMON LAW COURTS (IRELAND). On the motion that the Order of the Day for the third reading of the Preperty-tax Bill be read, Dr. LEFROY said that there was a Bill on the table of the House regulating the Common Law Courts of Ireland, of the contents of which Bill the Judges of those Courts knew nothing. He wished to know whether the Bill had received the sanction of tho Attorney- G eneral for Ireland ? The CHANCELLOR .f the EXCHEQUER said the Bill had been drawn up in accordance with the Report of a Commission appointed to investigate the subj , ct ; that a copy of it had been transmitted to the Judges in Ireland ; and that the Bill would not be proceeded with until the decision of the Judges should be known. INDIA. Mr. B. D'ISRAELI wished to know from the Right Hon. Baronet at the head of the Government whether her Majesty's Government had advanced any sums of money to the East India Company, or whether they had sanctioned the East India Company in raising any? Sir R. PEEL said that the question or the Hon. Member was rather a complicated one. If the lion. Member gave him notice he would be able to give an answer, and-with greater accuracy. Mr. DISRAELI said he thought it was unnecessary to give notice Sir R. PEEL said it was important that answer,. should be given with great accuracy, especially in their relations with the East India Company. There was great misconstruction of answers, and ho thought it would be better if Hon. Members would have the kind-- ness to give even a short notice of their intention to as k questions.—(Hear, hear.) PROPERTY-TAX. The Order of the Day for the third reading of the Property-tax Bill having been read, • Mr. SHARMAN CIiAWFORD rose to propose the motion of which he had given notice. He thought it was necessary for the House to consider whether they were in a condition to embrace a mode of taxation heretofoi e unprecedented, except in the case of an European war. He felt he would not be doing his duty as a representa tive, pledged to protect the rights of the people, and thut he would not be worthy of the position he held, if he did n.;l on this occasion oppose such a principle of taxation as was now proposed. It was hardly necessary that he should prove that the principle of taxation and repre sentation should be identical. It could not bt denied that they oft co•exist. That principle was asserted in the reign of Charles the First, and again in the reign of William the Third. That principle was also recognised in the rule that money Bills should not originate in the House of Lords but in that House •in which • the people was taxed by their own representatives. He now asked the House to coesider whether the people were really repro stinted. It was said that they were virtually represented, because property was - represented, but he (Mr. Crawford) denied that there was a virtual repre sensat ion of a great portion of the property of the country. The line upon which the suffrage was formed, was based upon the possession of an interest in land. All other property was left unrepresented to a very great extent. Any person who had not an interest of let in a house could not vote, so that all the property under that sum was left unrepresented. But if they coe sidered the state of the' suffrage with regard to the people at large, in its relation to population, then there was no ground o r pretence for saying that there was- a Mir representation. The proportion of electors to non-electors in England and Wales tuts' I to 18 ; in Scotland I to 30 ; and in Ireland 77'; or in the United Kingdom 1 to • 44. Only 1 out of every 9 families possessed the franchise. The rejection -by. the House of the motion made some time ago by the Hon. Member fur Finsbury (Mr. T. buncombe) proved what the state of the House was— that it by no means fairly represented the country. There were itot forty places in the empire empowered to send Representatives to Parliament which were not subject to the imputation of bribery. Such was the condition of the representation of the country. The people complained greatly of the wars in which this country was at present engaged—wars as unjust as they were impolitic. One of these wars had for its object the annihilation of the rights of a State which was friendly until it was provoked ; and the people"complained that this tax was imposed upon them in a great measure to pay the expenses of a war which was so unjust in its character. In ccrro bororation of these opinions, he would read some papers on the subject ; the first was an extract from the paper signed by all the Birmingham Delegates, with the • exception of two. They were of opinion that had the people been properly represented in that House, these wars would not have taken place. If they referred to former - periods of history, they would find that there was nothing more dangerous than for any body to attempt to tax the people without their having a just and fair representation. The proceedings of the reigns of Charles I. and James H. originated in an at tempt to tax the people without the consent of Parliament. Now that they were about to pass a new tax—a tax, which, in its effects, would press upon all classes, he . thought the people were justly entitled to call upon the House to amend the evils of the representative system. He wished it to be understood that in bringing forward his motion he was actuated by no party motives. He called upon them to affirm the principle that representation should be co - extensive .with taxation. • He .thought that such a principle was founded on justice, and he trusted that the House would not refuse to it their sanction. The Hon. Member concluded by moving—" That as by the existing laws a large proportion of the people of this realm are excluded from voting for Members of Parliament ; and as it also appears, by the Reports of different Election Committees, that cor rupt practices have been used to an extraordinary extent in procuring the return of Members to this present House of Commons; and as, from both these causes, this House cannot be considered a fair representation of the people ; it is, therefore, unfit that any system of increased taxation should be imposed by Parliament until all just Sir ROBERT I'EEL said, Sir, whatever may be the_ inconvenience to the public business which may arise from the adjournment, I feel it would be inconsistent with my duty if I should remain here ; that would not be consistent with the position which I hold. It would be most satisfactory if I could remain here ; but still there are considerations—(The Right Honourable Gentleman was here interrupted by loud cries of Hear, hear, and Adjourn.) 1 would wish to state the circumstances to the House, but, at the s&me time, my own information is so imperfect, that I cannot make any statement without great mistrust of its accuracy. (Hear. hear.) Since I came into the House I have received information that an attempt has been math: on her Majesty's life, and I have reason to believe—thanks to the - usual interference of Providence—that her Ma jesty has escaped.—(Loud cheers.) I have reason to believe that the assassin is. in custody, and the earliest opportunity will be taken to subject him to examination, and under the circumstances the House will deem my attendance requisite.z-L(Hear, hear.) " Mr. CHARLES WOOD—Is her Majesty safe ? Sir It. PEEL—Entirely safe, and the assassin has been apprehended; and under these circumstances, I leave it to the House to determine.—(L(tut cries of " Adjourn, adjourn.") I am under an engagement to my Noble Friend the Member for Dorset that he should bring forward his motion to morrow. Then if the House thinks it desirable that this question should be discussed, I propose that we should take the discussion immediately after my Noble Friend's motion is disposed of. I do not think that while the House is in such a state of excite ment they could follow up the discussion of tins question, and not only from respect to her .Ma 7 jesty, but from the excited state of their feelings, that a public question like this could be satisfactorily dis cussed, and I therefore beg leave to move that the House do now adjourn until to-morrow. The Right Hon. Baronet appeared throughout to speak under strong excitement. • Lord JOHN RUSSELL rose to second the mo tion.—(Cheers.) The natural state of excitement. into which the House must have bsen thrown by the intelligence they had just received, coupled as it was with the information that their Sovereign was safe—(Cheers)would render it quite impossible that the House should attend to the business under it 3 consideration. He considered, therefore, that the Right Hon.-Baronet had taken the best course in moving the adjournment of the debate. It was his duty to see that the assassin should be placed in safe custody. Under these circumstances he repeated that he entirely concurred in the course which the Right Hon. Gentie man had pursued.—(Hear, hear.) The debate was then adjourned, and the adjournment of the House was next zbreed to, at a few minutes be fore Seven o'Clock. SPIRIT of the PUBLIC JOURNALS. FROM THE EVENING PAPER 9 OF .YEST:.:RDAY. GLOBE.—A very . instructive commentary on the conduct of those (Tories to a man) who voted against the inquiry into the conduct of the,Tory party at the last election for Ipswich is furnished by the fact, th a t Messrs. Herries and Kelly are not the candidates in the Tory interest at the approaching cont es t. Will any friend of theirs inform the public the reason of this ? The Chancellor of the Exchequer on Thursday night told the House that Mr. Ilerries had nothing to do with the.petition against Messrs. Wason and Rennie. Will he extend that information, and take the earliest opportunity of stating how. it is that neither Mr. :Her ries nor: Mr. Kelly are now the candidates on the Tory interest? A story half told engenders strange, misgivings; and as Mr. Goulburn has thought it . ne cessary to volunteer a portion of the interesting tale, we would suggest that he should be asked in the House to favour the public with the conclusion. In truth, the Cory 'party in Ipswich have a strange fatality with 'their candidates. Since the year 1831, only eleven years since, they have had-no less than twelve different candidates. , . Impossible I , say our country readers ; and, indeed, it appears, so incredible, that we feel obliged to remove all doubts by giving the, names, in the order in which they appeared :-Mackinnon, Fitzroy, Goulburn, Kelly, Dundas, Brooke, Hohnes, Gibson, Cochrane, Ilerries, Lord Desart, Glad stone—a good array, and unmatched, we yen tu_re to think, in any borough in the kingdom. V; hat is the reason of this ? Is it that the Tories in that borough have felt dissatisfied with their candi dates ? or' have the candidates declined a second plucking ? The public have been informed by one gentlem an — a gallant officer, Sir T. Cochrane—why he declined standing upon a second occasion ; and if all the others would be equally communicative, some valuable discoveries would, doubtless, be elicited. W e hope that the present will be a fair stand-up fight ; but we cannot congratulate the Tories on the nominate a o f one o f t h e i r present victims. To cz Gladstone, son and partner of the Gladstone, as a candidate for the representation of a town near the abode of the venerable Clarkson, and in which the Alexanders and the Ransomes reside—men who have always stood in the fOremOst rank against the horrors and atrocities of slavery--Idoes seem, to say the least of 't, a very bold step, A4ich looks more like a nomina tion of the Carlton Club, than the free choice of even the Tory part of the Ipswich constituency. Be this, however, as it may, the Liberals are in good heart, and, with fair play, ought to win the election ; as, in addition to their majority of fifty-seven at the last election, th ey h ave an .inerease at the registration which has since taken place, of above forty. STANDARD.—It may be 'rernembererl that, six years ago, when Dr. Hampden was appointed Jo the Chair of Regius Professor of Divinity in the Univer sity of Oxford, the appointment was received with considerab'e alarm, from a doubt of the soundness of the Rev. Gentleman's theological opinions, founded upon som eg e uit e v q c u a i l ro t e i a le / passages in his published ser theology, has seen hou mops; passages were, and no more; and whoever • has had occasion to read much easy it is for an inclin e tious writer, or even a writer not practised in the technical style of theology, to fall into equivo cal forms of expression. The alarm conse quent upon Dr. Hampden's appointment extended to the Heads of the University, who, without im peaching the Rev. Gentleman's opinions, felt that he, who held the high andresponsible office of instructor The arguments in this part-heard cause, which en med the Court the entire of Saturday, were re sumed today. It came on upon an ex officio informa tion against the Masters, Wardens, and Commonalty of the Society of Merchant Venturers of Bristol, and James Helliean, their treasurer. The information, after setting forth the in corporation of the Society, stated that in November, 1703, Edward Colston, of London, merchant, had by deed con veyed upon trust to Sir J. Duddlestone and nineteen other trustees, the great house in St. Augustine's Back, Bristol, the manor of Bere, in Somersetshire, and various other lands, to be appropriated to the boarding and education of 50 poor boys in the above-mentioned house. The yearly rents of these lands amounted to 7201., which covered all the expenses of the establishment, and left a balance yearly of 19/. Colston afterwards added 50 more boys to the school, and to provide for the additional expense conveyed to trustees certain fee farm rents to the amount of 555/. 16s. a year. The information prayed that the charity might be es tablished, that it might be ascertained of what the property consisted, whether the Society was indebted in any and what sum to the charity, and for an account. Mr. PEMBERTON replied to-day, and at the conclusion of his observations the Court rose.—Judgment deferred. VIOE-CHANCELLORS' COURT, May 30. (Before Vice-Chancellor Wzaa..am.) BOND V. GRAHAM. His HONOUR delivered judgment in this case. The question for the Court to decide was a que s ti o n o f accoun t. The tes tator, Clements Brown, was in India, as were his three ex ecutors. at the time of his death. One of the executors had declined to prove. All,that . v; as prayed by the will as amended was, that one of the executors, named Graham, might account for what he had received, and it was insisted that this might be done without having before the Court a personal represen tative of the testator. Graham, on the other hand, insisted that he had accounted in India, that he still remained liabl e to the parties beneficially interested in the estate, and that in order that a proper account might be rendered it was necessary that the estate should be duly represented. His Honour said the only question was, phether the residue of the estate administered had assumed the new character of a trust fund, unconnected with the estate of the testator. From the answer of the de fendant it appeared that he had always acted as executor, and had dealt with the property as part of the estate of the tes tator. However much, therefore, he might lament the delay, the only decree he could make was, that the case should stand over in order that a repri.sentative in this country might be duly constituted. COURT OF Q UEENS BENCH, May 30. IN THE MATTER OF ALDERMAN THOMAS WOOD. In this case, which arose out of the disputes existing among the Shareholders of the Talacre Coal Company, Mr. Roebuck had obtained a rule in lest Michaelmas term, calling upon Alderman Thos. Wood, who was one of the Directors of, and, in conjunction with his partner, Mr. Ellis, Solicitor to this Company, to answer certain allegations made in the affidavits of the applicants, and also to show cause why he should not (b.-- liver up to the applicants certain papers belonging to the Com pany in his possession. The Solicitor-General and Mr. Butt had shown cause against the rule last term, and Mr. Kelly, Mr. Jervis, and Mr. Roebuck had been heard in support of it. On that occa sion the Attorney-General had attended to watch the proceed ings on behalf of Mr. Alderman T. Wood's co-trustees in the Company' The Con :at this morning gave judgment in the case, dis charging the rule without costs. JUDGMENT.-THE QUEEN V. HART.-BRIBERY AT CAM- The defendant in this case, Robert Hart, had been con. vie.ted at the last Cambridge Assizes of having, on the 27th of June, 1841, bribed one William Topping Large, by giving to him a sum of 101. to vote for Lord Cosmo Russell and Richard Fo,ter, jun., Esq., who were at that time candidates for the representation of the borough of Cambridge in Parliament. He this morning appeared upon the floor of the Court to receive judgment. The affidavit of the defendant himself, in mitigation of pu nishment, was then put in and read. %Ir. 13. ANDREWES, in mitigation, urged that, although it was impossible to attempt to justify the conduct of the defen dant, yet it was much to be regretted that those who had em ployed the man were not standing there to receive the judg ment of the Court instead of the wretched instrument. The defendant had already suffered some punishment; he had been arrested in Cambridge on a Sunday, and had been kept in soli tary confinement on the felons' side of the gaol for 24 days upon the authority of a warrant, which Mr. Justice Patteson had sub sequently decided to be illegal. It appeared, moreover, that the defendant was a stay-maker, a business requiring his per sonal superintendence, and that he had a wife and three chit dren depending upon him for support. On these grounds he tt usted the Court would take a merciful view of his case. Mr. KELLY then addressed the Court in aggravation of punishment. He agreed with his Learned Friend, Mr. Andrewes, that justice could not be done until the real criminals, those who employed persons in the situation of the defendant to commit the crime of bribery, should be brought to the bar of that Court. But who was to blame if the real offenders escaped from jus tice? It was persons who, like the defendant, became the willing instruments of those who engaged them in the commis sion of this crime, and whe refused to give up the names of their employers. It was the defendant and the defendant alone who could bring those who had been really guilty to justice. The defendant stood in a peculiar situation. He was not a man residing in the place of election, and ardently at tached to a political party, who might yield to the unwonted excitement of the moment, and give a bribe and repent of the offence which he had committed, immediatelyafter its commission. He was a total stranger to the town of Cambridge. He was unconnected with either of the candidates. He came over from Norwich under a false name, for the purpose of carrying on a regular system of corruption in the town of Cambridge. There was nothing in the circumstances of the case to palliate the offence of which the defendant had been con victed. He did not ask the Coutt to disregard the fact of the defendant's family being dependent upon his exertions for their support, but he would just remind the Court that in all proba bility those whom the defendant concealed and_ protected were able to do what was necessary for his family. Unless some ex emplary and ,evcre punishment were inflicted open those who lent themselves to be the instruments of this crime, it would be a vain attempt by legislative enactment, or by any other means, to pet down the offence in this country. Their Lordships having consulted together, Mr. Justice Parrissox delivered the judgment of the Court as follows —Robert hart, you are brought here to receive the judgment of the Court upon an indictment charging you with having at the last election for Members to serve in Parliament, for the borough of Cambridge, bribed a voter named Large, by giving him a sum of 10/., to vote for certain candidates in whose election you took an interest. This indictment having been found was removed by you into this Court, and you were tried and found guilty. It appears that you have already suffered some imprisonment, for twenty-four days I think, before you were admitted to bail, and you also state that you have been put to some expense ; the chief part of this, however, has been incurred by the removal of the indictment into this .Couft, which was your own choice. The offence of bribery is an of • fence which this Court will visit severely in ever) case which may be brought before it, more particularly where the bribery has taken place for the purpose of influencing the elections of Members of Parliament. It is of the utmost importance to the interests of the community, and of every member of it, that the elections of Members of Parliament should be kept free and pure, and that all persons entrusted with the valuable franchise and privilege of voting for Members of Parliament, should be suffered to exercise that franchise and privilege without any un due influence whatever, more especially without being influ eneed by any consideration ofa pecuniary nature. It appearsfrom It appeared that, on the afternoon of Sunday se'nnight, the prosecutrix was informed by one of her neighbours that the prisoner had thrown a log of wood at one of her children, and was then pursuing' it up the court, and threatening to murder it. Upon receiving this information, the prosecutrix ran,.ut and asked the prisoner what he meant by such violent conduct.? Upon which the latter, who had a knife in his hand, immedi ately raised his arm, and exclaiming, " You - I'll cut your head from your body," he made a stab at her face, andin flicted ase \ ere wound, extending from the, eye to the side of her month. She fell to the ground, and was afterwards con veyed to the shop of Mr. Burton, a surgeon in the neighbour hood, who dressed the wound, and ordered her removal to tit. Bartholomew's Hospital. The prisoner was given into trki custody of Police Constable Mansfield of the N division, who took the knife from him, which was covered with blood. Mr. Burton said that the wound was about four inches in length, and a quarter of an inch deep. The prosecutrix was now out of danger. In his defence, the prisoner said that the children had been in the habit of incessillly annoying him; he was in the act of repelling an aggression of the sort, when he was attacked by the prosecutrix, who was accidentally cut in the struggle that ensued. One of the officers said that the prisoner was convicted last year of a similar offence, for which he suffered six months' &m -prisonment. The prisoner uas committed for trial. Baron Rehausen, the Swedish Charge d'Affaires, occupied a seat on the Bench the greater part of the day. UN/ON- HAL L. IstrunENT ROBBERY —John Morgan, a well-dressed young man, was committed on a charge of stealing a watch, the pro perty of Air. Reid, a watchmaker on Newington-causeway. AGG RAVATED A SSA ULT. —John Cockrell, a man of respect able appearance, was charged with throwing a red hot poker at his wife, setting fire to her clothes, and injuring one of her legs. The complainant stated, that on Friday evening, a; she was sitting at the fire, the defendant, to whom she brought a for tune of 2,0001. on their marriage, drew the hot poker out of the fire, and threw it at her. It struck her on the leg,, and set fire to her clothes. She added, that she had been subjected to ill treatment from the defendant ever since their marriage. The defendant said that the poker dropped out of the fire by accident and did the injury. He' was adjudged to enter into his recognizance of 100/. to keep the peace. certain papers, - and froth the money found in your possession, that you went to Cambridge prepared to bribe any person wim would take a bribe at your Lands. It - has been observed by ouc of the Learned Counsel than a person may ho induced by the ' feelings of excitement durug the ele.ion to ofFer a bribe. I merely.. mention this, because I would not haee it for one mo ment supposed that the Court would eons:der such eireurn stances as any palliation of the uffence ; but such is not your case: you set off from k.orwieb for the deliberate - pm-pose:of lending your aid. in the corruption of the constituency of Cam bridge. Taking all the circumstances of the casie into consi deration, and considering the imprisonment you have already undergone, the sentence. of the Court is that you be imprisoned in her Majesty's gaol of Norwich for twelve calendar months, and that in the meantime I,ou be committed to the custody of the Marshal.—TheJefendant was then removed in custody. POLICE IN TELLIGENCE. Bo Tv- *CTRL ET. A simple-looking young fellow, very tolerably dressed, WAS brought up in custody of police constable A 63, chat-grit with being found in the neighbourhood of 11 hitehall under sus , ,,i,,k,us circumstance. The policeman briefly stated the facts to be - that the prisoner had been seen lately for some days lurking about the premises of Sir Robert Peel, and as he appeared to have no busluisi there, and could give no satisfactory account of himself, witness took him into custody. In answer to ques - tions from Mr. Had, the prisoner stated that he was in great destitution, and could not succeed in ob taining employment ; as a dernier resort, he determined on making application to Sir Robert Peel, to see if he could pro vide him with a situation, and with that intent he had been waiting about the Right Hun. Gentleman's residence. Inspector Pearce stated that when the young man was taken to the station-house, he appeared very reckless, and said he did not care what he did; rather than be as he was at present he should wish to be transported. Mr. HALL gave the prisoner a very severe reprimand for his foolish conduct. It was not at all likely that Sir Robert Peel would speak to him, or provide him with a sitmtion unless he were properly introduced to him ; and if such con duct as this were to be allowed, Sir Robert Peel would be con stantly molested by impudent persons, either fools or knaves. For what he had done he was now liabh, to be transported, and he could assure him that he would not find prison food or prison discipline so agreeable as he seemed to think. The prisoner, who appeared to have had enough of prison discipline horn what he experienced in the cells of the Police Court last night, expressed his contrition for his foolish conduct, and promised, if he were discharged, now to go home to his friends and riot offend again On this understanding Mr. HALL consented to discharge him. MA t.l Mr. Henry Whiting, a respectable tradesman, was charged with plucking off a sprig of red-coloured blossom May, as he was proceeding along the North Walk of Kensington-gardens on Sun day evening. He was walking with a lady at the time, and snatched off a very small portion of the blossom to stv.,m.t to her admiration, upon which he was immediately pounced upon by the constable No. 8 of the Gardens, who took him into cus tody, an idst a large assemblage of persons, and walked hint, with a crowd at his heels, to the Station-house, in Vines street, Regent-street, where he was consigned to " durance vile," until he could procure bail. • The defendant said he bad not the slightest intention of doing wrong, or of committing injury of any kind. Seeing the blos som of beauWul colours, he did thoughtlessly pluck off a twig to show to the lady (his wife) he was walking with. Mr. HAanwicx said ;f every person who visited the gardens did the same very little of the shrubberies would be left. No doubt it was heedlessly done, and he should therefore fine the defendant only 75., instead of the full penalty, 40s. The fine was immediately paid. CLERKEN WELL. The Rector of St. Peter's Church, Saffron-hill, attended at the office yesterday, and stated that it was, a constant Frae• tice with some persons residing in the neighbourhood of • the church, to get on the tops of their houses during the hours of divine service and commence firing blunderbusses and pistols at pigeons; others threw stones, by which the windows had been repeatedly hr.:ken. The noise was so great, that he could hardly make himself intelligible to his congregation. On Sun• day the Bishop of London had been visiting him, and his Lord ship felt very much annoyed by it. Mr. GREENWOOD said he could do nothing but hold the parties to bail. He thought it would be useless for him to summon them, as he could hardy make out a case against them • but; complainant had better apply t o th e C omm i ssioners of Police. WORSHIP-STREET 1 John Lovett, a bone collector, 72 years, of age, was finally examined upon a charge of having assaulted and wourulea Sarah Harris, a married woman, living in Baker's-renis, Hackney. road. CROYDON POLICE, Mr. Serle, the relieving officer of Mitcham, accompanied by Mr. Tipple, the medical officer of, that district, attended before Messrs. Read, Wilson, and Lucas, the presiding Ml gistrates, to apply for an order for the admission of one William Phelp, a lunatic. into the County Lunatic Asylum. This individual is the person whose singular delusion has al ready been made public. It will he remembered that, on a for mer occasion, it appeared that he fancied himself to be the post master of Mitcham, and that some lunatic person was at large in that neighbourhood, whom he wished to be placed under restraint. He accompanied the parties who made the application on the former occasion, and sup orted that application with great earnestness, frequently observing that it was the duty of the Magistrates to protect the poor man, and place him in some establishment where he might net be likely to injure himself or others. The Court upon that occa sion said they would not grant such an order, except upon the application of the parish officers, and the matter accordingly stood over until this sitting. Mr. Serle said that his application now was, on behalf of the parish officers of Mitcham, that the Magistrates should grant. an order for the removal of William Phelp, a pauper lunatic, to the County Lunatic Asylum. The poor man here interrupted the proceedings by saying, " You recollect me, gentlemen. I was here about this business before. The man really must be taken care of." Mr. Read asked him if he had sold any of his Three-and-a- Half per Cents., and he replied that he was pushing them off as fast as he could, and he added that he had only got about eleven millions left. He said, however, that he was about to marry a very rich heiress, and that would make him all right again. . . . . Mr. Read inquired whether the lunatic was actually charge able to the parish of slitcham ? Mr. Serle said that he teas. the relatiens had applied to the Board of Guardians for relief, and, by the order of the Board, he had given them half a crown, CO that he was in point of law, at the present t:me chargeabe to that parish. The Board were satisfied with ;lie representations of his friends, and considered him a.; a pauper, and this application was made with their authority, and the medical officer was present, tc , testify as to the insanity of the lunatic. Mr. LUCAS said that there wa., unfortunately, no (I , :ubt of that fact, but he questioned whether the Magistrates would be justified in considering him as a pauper lunatic. He thought they ought to have some evidence as to the state of his cir cumstances. Mr. Potter, a brother-in-law to the lucatic, was then ex amined, and he stated that before his relative was attacked with this di,tresing malady, he was in good an eurnstances, and carried on the business of a tailor, but since hie illness the buil riess had been much reduced, and it was entirely carried on by a foreman. In answer to a question from the Bench. he stated that he considered the lunatic's business at the present time was quite solvent. Mr. LUCAS expressed his opinion that under such circum stances the Magistrates would not be justified in ordering the admission of the party as a pauper lunatic, for if they did, they would at the same time have to make an order upon the over seers of Mitcham for the cost of his maintenance. Mr. Serle intimated that the Board of Guardians were satin. fled with the explanation given to them, and they treated the case as that of a pauper. The BENCH said this might be, but it was the duty of the Magistrates to see that the law was properly carried out. They felt convinced that it did not apply to the presf nt case, and they must, the-efore, refuse the application. They, at the same time, advised the friends of the lunatic to apply to some of the private establishments, and said they would no doubt find no difficulty in getting him admitted to one of them. Mr. Bunn will take a benefit at Covent-garden to-night. We have the greatest pleasure in • saying that the performances chosen for the occasion have the utmost at traction, and are not likely to be equalled during the reason at any theatre. Mr. Bunn hes been chiefly instrumental in afford ing the public the rich tree: they now enjoy in the presence of a German opera, and Mr. Bonn's long and valued services in ca tering for the public are so well appreciated that he has a right to expect an overflow. Be e th oven ' s fid e li o will commence the evening's entertainment, including the entire strertgih f the company, after which La Fille de Dominique will be per formed, expressly fuK the appearance cf the celebrated actress, Mademoiselle Dejaxet ; and during the et,ening, the charming , Guy Stephan will introduce (by Mr. Lumley's permission) • her celebrated Spanish dance, and M. Desplaces and Mdlle. Fleury will execute &grand pas di deux. About five months ago. an elderly- lady, rained Landoire, met with a severe accident in alighting from one of the omnibuses, called Parisiennett. The conductor baying pulled the string for the driver' to go on. before Mme. Lan doire was fully off the step, she fell to the ground and broke her leg. The conducteur laid hold of her and raised her tip, hut as the omnibus was still going on he lest his hold, and the lady falling a second time brow both arms. Although at length able to leave her bed, after long suffering, Mme. Lan doire, being a cripple for life, brought an action for damages against the omnibus company, before the Civil Tribunal, and . obtained a verdict of 6,000 f. Dissatisfied with this verdict' she appealed to the Cour Royale, and the cause having been heard on Thntsday, a decision was pronounced, raising the damages tp 10,000 f. PORT OF GLOUCESTER.—The trade of our port has relapsed into a most inanimate state. Very few hands can find euipkyrnent,'and a good deal of distress is the result. The warehouses are groaning with foreign corn in hood, very little of which has been, or is likely to be, liberated at the rese ll ; ; rate of duty.— Gloucester Journal. LLOY'D'S Sty k ppiNG. NV. ~ • . t ('-`"e • • It° i .c uas tin 6 1 , P a rt 'lt ek i etS:idCa it Cabe;. Antiecia ; I :`,. ii r e c7u b r 6 u7 g Q ll' ll:b l e a a d ; 4 ' 4u:-; Z`tt. Joao - Wind Nind ,liar 2 Krieft, nie. A; rd S di:;.y Co w Es. !'t ;t. George, Loation for Zealand. OFF DA 113.110:;TH, MAY 27.—. I sabella s_s ri a Pi.vziotrria, May 'N.V., light, . ;:9 : W.S.W Pla.nter, Kirk, Alaurititt.;,,,,)l Emma, Demerara. Duke of Wellington, Honduras, Hunt. ; Chrvst al, Hive, Nlairiot CPl un ' (11, Mary, Smyrna ; C a l e d en i a , - B ran d er, N ew Orleart , ; ington,. Wilkin s on, ; Cambridge, Barstont New ite, Ca!edoiria ( s t eamer ), Boston. And. off, Seve rn, Constantine, Mobile; Echo and R oscoe , New I ' llk Washington, Mata nzas ; U n i te d S tates, Boston ' : a , I folindland ; Alonte Video ; alint, Benif ra ",rici ; nohia, China; Jane Walker, St. I)liti's, Quebee. Thf., Eliza and Susan, tor ii.shove on Tabasco Bar fui the 14th ult., and ei'P eci riDi 4 sn ci.t. a wreck. Th e A rnaativ itl• Kean. from was taken into Nassau the latter end of last month. STANOGATE CREEK, MAY 29.—Artal. Fairy Qullice. l FAL:I4OE2Ii, .MAY 29.—Wind Garin, Leghorn, sailcd I*. Sld E ques trian, C hu' SOUTHAMPTON, 3:AY 28.—S1d. Royal Tar steamer' raliar. CiP e OFF TORBAY, MXY .—Cigar, Amsterdam f°' Verde and River Plate ; Kronprinsen, Messina. VESSELS SPOKEN WlTH.—Ulvertlonr, Liverpotwo'icd; ham, 25111 inst. lat. 51, lot). 7, by the Angerons , arr i a t. Falmouth'. Fleece, Malaga to Falmouth, 14th its t of . ,, , lon.' 12, by the Mayen, z, arrived at ditto. Ruby, S c oltri London, 21st inst. lat ' . 41, lon. 15 ; Sh ann on, for 26th inst. off Scilly, by the Julia, arrived ado. La/Y. 0 1. 1, ; ' enottk. for London, 25th i ns t. l a t. 48, l on . 9, bYll' beth, arrived at do. Rosalie, bound to Brazils, w e lat. 8, N. lon. 22; Sophia Dorothea, from 29th ult., Inn. 20, lat. 38, by t h e G reen h ow , r Lowther barque, of Newcastl e , an d G eorge c f Stoc' , - „aos Newcastle, out 21 days, 27th u lt.. ; Strathmore, Legh °— , don, 111th inst. off Gibraltar ; Waterloo, bound to tbesl„ inst., 59 miles W. of Scilly, by the Osprey, arrived azif liar Mary Haiket, London t o th e C ape , 17 t h i nst ., Ist. 3',2%21iir1 British Queen, of Whit e h aven , f or th e W est Indio.: fr lat. 47, lon. 14, by the Anne, arrived at Falmoutz' fr y steamer, for West Indms, 10th inst., lat. 39, lon. 1 , 4 „ ; Isl hopper, Smyrna to Ply mou th, 6th i nst ., l at . 38, c „ - a 'e, the John, arrived in the Downs. Af r i can u s , from v ta Y' l the entrance of the Ga m bi a , Ap r il 25 ; S amue l, Cadiz )f,, founoland, 13th inst., l a t. lon. 31; Albeiti z 'l6 Banca, 14th, l a t. 42, l on . 26 ; Willi am Pi tt , 3tkw,', l s' lon. 20 ; Caroline, London for Jamaica, 26th, Ist- Isabella Ellen, arrived off Dartmouth. THE MARKETS.-4 ESTEEOI‘ CORN EXCHANGE. . If Last week's arrival of all grains were moderte.f.i both English . and Foreign, brought former prices , ; P 7O l , more freely than of late. Beans and Peas unaltetet t 1 good quality rather dearer, o th er descriptions unvarl'" met a inoderate demand at last quotations. ill ,• AII.iiIVAI.:OI , GrIAIN IN LONDON DURINII t•,A # i Wheat.. 1-•-ti.c , . ~4 L • # EngliSil : 4,1 , 52ir5. 2,13-.1;. i 5,',5 •s : ti t Irish .... i --I 11,84. J • t hit' Foreign .., t 6,t)87 I 1 'lOB3 , riticFS ()NI ROA Ha) OF ‘TIP #' Wheat,Red (0;c1) s. —s. Beans, Sinalijiow,:••• ,- F• ----White (old).„„ ••-s- -S. .••••-••••'"'••••'•••••"• (old) .....••• it •—•-:-- ileil',1841)••• 504. 545. Tiek.view .. ..... ,0, , ------- Fine &la. mi. --..-------- (old) • ..... ''' 0 „ , .,:i SLipertine 6.2a. 64 s. —. Harrow (1101' 1 '7, wnite (iFiai) 5.F. slh. . ,Gici)... ' ?, ------ vine • 60s 63:: Brank . , I, .-- Siiiierfine 6435. Ws. pats, Feed ................. "' . 4"' .... , ---Foreignf tee 5".:!,. ';'*2 . Ityt 380. 40s. -- Poland.. ..... ••••"* ., 1 7 , Sarloy . - New! . ..... ." if -- Grinding ' 'is .28s, Potatoe ......... •••" . 1; Malting ~..... Ai, 32S ..."-........---..... Vew •• •••:,:ki Malt siii. 60s. -- Scoten . ..... ......" I:1! -- Fine New tits. ti4a Irish 145 , '''F, , Fuse, Grey, New ' , Or. :3•25. Flom Town k per •-ac 1,1 " . .,'",' Maple New 'll, ti 4, -- See(.nos ............ 'ir'' -...—.:-. White 34 _2 3 ,,. : -- N.rth CountrY , ti , . —.. Boilers oni .11,... Bran ......................... '' SMITHFIELD. - wt 3o The supply was about an ave rage one , b u t trade P and prices generally lower, from `.,:d. to 4d, per stor0; 1 0 2,774 ; Sheep i;rid Lambs, 27,100 ; Pigs, 417; E 3i. Beef, :Is. to 4s. 2d. ; Mutton, 3s. to 4s. 2d. i Veal, ss. ; Pork, '.2s. Bd. to 4s. 6d. ; Lamb, ss. to 6s. .____ NLON, TEA :%lARKET. if ° T The demand for Fr. Trade Tea was v e ry lisaitr t iP the publie sales scarcely any was so ld . P r i ces coniii l " sqrts. Several arrivals of Tea are near at hand. TALLOW AARKET. There were few purchasers. bur holder wore fi. ... — itit 01. for small parcel ., of first quality on th e spot, an d 4' o, delivery in the last three months of the year. PROVISION MARKET. v e Butter sold slowly ; fine Dutch at %is. to 93s' t. Bacon dull, and prices d ec lining-475. to 50s, per C HOP MA RKE T. Prices firm, and a fair business done. The axe the plantations are favourable. FRUIT MARKET. A fair business done, and at firm rates. COAL .11A ttlika'. Ships arrived since last market.da.r, . d. eel!, Robson & Co. Hartley 1(i ( W. E. Braddyll'sHW t4 s Buddlo's %%est Hartley 1; C Walls End Ha+well...•'' Holywcll Trader Old tantieht lord's audheogh l4 F Walls End Morrison 1 01 South Pontrp anflcld MoOr . . 6f Walls End /Rama t Tayle,'S Hartley West Wylarn Wylatn . Wails E d e and I- 1•4 0: Walls End Adel/Ade • Walls End Hotspur walls End Knlingworth Wallp End Belmont 19 0 COUNTRY COR ,N MARKETS: Wheat. Uarley. oat.. ' Bea ns. I. •-• • Per Qua: ter. Abingdon—. Andover__ Banbury lizavngstoke Cirencester Coventry Daventry Dci by kiowden 8. to B. 64 61 St 3 4.4 7 53 io a. to s. 24 :i6 .0 80 2 fti `25 :'5 24 29 '22 A 2..; Ss S. to S. S. tt) y. se 31 33 4f i to t 4, -- 1 8 9.2 36 4 34 4A 4S 4 1 3•i 33 1' !O St 0 t , 6 61 bS 71 16 idt 43 26 Hungerford Matt• n MaiLienhead Nottingham Wastage , Warwick ..„ Wit cheater York 46 '7u f'2 80 52 7a 56 68 (IS 78 29 37 26 3 32 35 t , 9 :I) 41 t 0 f2B 25 31 19 24 flo 32 6 30 - 36 .4 4 ..7 3ti 41) 7f; - C 2 Per Bustle; s, d. 8. d, 7 0 . a 6 s.d. 8. d.I 8. d. s. d. ' s.e i 36 46130 40 00 o' ;OS CORN t+.k 111 Ji ET. 1 0 ' 161 k. 601 b. • 111' 0' . 60:6. , , [o' Wheat, Nor • LEE. 791 k Anti stai Norf, - York, Grin, . . s..und Linc , rnl 411d,Saii :shire L ding thlk . •1" oi ineninsh Irk _ , , A 8 ' l e Beans -.11,.... , • Oats, Potatue -51eahog, loc. 9d. to 01.• Eng..l,4, • • :9;4' . ,.•,.. 6 i Shening . DEVIZEs CORI.. MARKLt . Fl Pia Sack. *. 4. S. .1.1 ter Quartet . . s , : i r, I , '' /1 r'irst Wheat... ...... .:3 0 to Lzt: OiOats... .... ........4, : v 0 Sccotol rtitr4l d,rley 2l 0 59 0 Mead Weir lail oo J- 4 1. q -M CIITE:NH A 'N.t !WARM k;l6. i f fer ilusliel. s. d. to B.d; Pet 111. • 1 ‘.l.h,at .... 7 f... 90 I Tlee• .„......„,, ...... ..."'' " i dit1ey......... Beam 5 0 '5 4 I Pork . •." ...*' ' . ..... .... ..... . t"ease H 0, ay 41.5i. t 9 41. 10s. Od. 1;t:r I.o' CA INT'ER 1311 RI MA.R.K ET. VI. Wheit, white-- CU to ;a% ....... 01ti—........ - '', . to, red.....--.... 6:13. to tiu. —01 d—.......... - ~''' to, Rarboy, Malting 303. to 34s —.Gr a ding .. , '" to ' Oats ---- :21s. to V.t.s. . «... 014...-- e - - . to, Reani--....-- 32s to Vs. .—... 01d......... ii - :to Pease -----.. 40s. to —s. Grey.....—... ,--' HULL. CORN MARKET. el" White (per Quarter) 6o'. 0 . -°' ,its' Red , -,65., tr' el* Wheat, :.,.... %- Foreign Maltit:g Va. '6 4 'o OriEding Uir .1 10 ".„ Of ir Oats, British - Of Foreign (in bond) 783 0 4( • Beans.-- .., _ ~.. &rley, 0- . Pease, Grey Blue and White ..... 3t;,, 3' 0 , , Linseed....... ...... 4'o • }lour per sack Bapese,d (per 1 , , , quarters) i - tADDINGSON COIN I' , I,ARKET. frel Wheat. barley. 1 Oak ISC. , b 1 •'' e i First II. Od f3s , d 1 27s 04 401 Ott ~- i J Secondj - 25 , , 54 Stis Od , i Third... 56s 04 28, 00 I 22s ltd ,?Ms 00 Av raga ("41,ASUOW CORN 7'4i Ft litT ~ 0 ',1 . 1 0 ;; .1 Wl•eat, per Atliir, 8. 4. ad. j Oats, ovr ,t;t4l.• I . • English , • ..•.". I . I', Scottisn 1,..1 ..1 2 5 F) Br" / II S.,dis. fo :r 1 ; 6;1 '0 ' 1 Irish ... Foreign ...... English I, tottish .O. U. 2.16 i Oatmeal, r!...r 1.!`.. , 0' , 41 t Irish , DA I.K M F.T TH CORN MARE.. .14 %% heat. Marie.. 1 OAts. I I'clse. f Sit , ' irst ( Os o.i 31s 61 ; 27, 4ii :i7, 0.1 1 !:.,' Set•end tr.s Ost .8. lid I 24s 84 ! , 4. 04 IV , hird , 464 oif 21s 00 18s 84 30s o.' EDINBURG/1 MEAL NI.ARRET. . / Per Sack of Sbi, lbs. I Per Ston, of 1.111).. 111 First Oatmeal £l 16 . 0 • First Oatmeal.— j-. 0 'l° Second Ditto ~,.......• o, I i 0 Barleyli.e.:ll Peasemeal_ .„... .. ••• Pot Barley from 3t's. to les. For sack. CORNWALL MaRKETt.,. (Calevalated at :3 gallons to the hoshe!•;:4 Barley. if d. t« s. a. a. a /I 0 :1 8 0 /# 0 3 /0 0 35 I /,# 4 4 ' 0 3tl 0 /# 03 I e o,o l‘ 34 0 / o' • r Whu e. ii. to r. d. 1 e. U • 7 5 '.7 8 0 e 8 8 -- 7 6 7 5 • - 7 2 8 4 Truro.... t lelamrie St. Austell Bothnin ••. ...... 0 • 0 la:Y.:Word R fl Penzance BIRTHR, On the Ilth inst., the lady of Ricliarg Knight 'Esq.': Vale, of a daughter. „.,1 r.' On the 2cl ii.st., at St. Andrew' s , Fif e , the li"1 L' si t ' Fairlie, Esq., of a daughter. A UPF er On the 2;111 inst., Airs. H enr y M ayor , o f pilY o , Isling- , ,n,,,t a son, still.b.trn. t be oo u , On the 6th inst., at Sh er l ey H ouse , Cror"' fe.' ft ) Martin T. Smith, Esq., of a so n , •.\ hi) snrviced on'ilYlol ° On the 26th inst., at Felpham, near Bognor, IV -, I , (1. Rev. G. C. Lusfortl, ot a sou. • 0 r -, uti On the l:fith inst., at Broadstairs, ,he la,ly of .at Peale, It. N„ of a daughter. MARRIED. Dra m a Oct thestMd inst., at the Lutheran Chureh, 1 t 1 "! 3 :01 15 ' 0", W. Sale, Eel.. of Manchester, S o li c i tor , t o : 4 0 j, draughter of the late W. Cobden,- - Esq., of I%lidt.( o° (in the 26th ow.. at 6t. .Mark's Church, Kel' n ' a il i r ,;er ° of ilerne-hni, turret', to C a the r ine, ch' u ''' J,,hrs Barton, of Lambeth. t f i tr'4 1) 11La 13 °' r on the 7th inst., M. Ann Outhwaite, o f Vpli" o af - Smith&ld, aged ez. it Il e On the 17th inst., at Park, Ilenfrew,,hiro, "" il iP „„t w •- ..,,, on, Eslp, .nsrehant, thasgew. • siT• s" ~ On the 2tith init., in South Atiley-street , r`,", b , ; $ O l E.q., formerly a C apta i n i n the'ith. Dragoon Go.v s, 10; 00,0 On the 26th ins L., at Cowbrid g e, South Wa ke Beath Malkin, Esq., LL.D„ aged 72. Joh" ,/ On the 2tith inst.., in Upp er Barley-street,_o, /- - 0 ( Pa; ker. Esq. of (ire - Lm-park Cork. --•""VN .'S ," 0 -"-rr- 1 7•'"".......—" , ...-----"-: __,........ - toridc.n ; Printed zrid Pubtish , ,t; ty Al CRDO tro t ~,.. ~, , ;.112, stra.i. Lt, 7 - , , ,, ,r , ,.,Otflee, N O -2_ 00 0. Lbe CounLy of l'iraddiesex, Tuesday, I':a7 ' 1 ' *ft,44 *QO Q., 1 1.4 1 C,, ' -_ -a 4. 1 a • : 11 • ti fy 4 ti ~ f ~ \ 1 4, A