The Sun. — London, England, 1831-08-18 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. A respectable contemporary of our's inserted yes terday morning a letter from a correspondent, sign ing himself " A.," who thought proper to make that journal (and we blame neither the o titer of the etter nor the editor of the Morning Chronicle) the medium of an attack upon the Tinter for ; :mpolicy or inconsistency, because of its vehement and tarty opposition to that clause of the Reform Bill whieh enacts a division of the counties. We shell dismiss with a passing smile, the childish attempt of this corresponaent of the Morning Chronicle to lay at Mr. Croker's door our alleged " declaration of war " against the Ministry. Mr. Croker spoke in civil terms of the Times last week, and therefore we an nounced, above a month ago, our disapprobation of the clause ire question ! 1 . We beg to repeat and to remind our readers of the fact, that very early with= in the first seven days of July, we expressed our selves hostile to the county-division clause, though without dwelling at any length upon the subject, lest we might help to distract public attention from the raore urgent purpose of endeavouring to get rid of schedules A and B, then and long afterwards made the instruments of great embarrassment and alarm, from the manoeuvres of the Tory opposition, and of our Right Honourable seducer, Mr. Croker himself, among them. if the display of our determined, and reiterated, and most ear nest hostility to the aforesaid elsuae, has been postponed to a more recent period, will not any can , did man allow that we specified a sufficient reason for postponing it ? If the reason which we have adduced be not sufficient,—namely, our conviction of the necessity of first disposing of the rotten bo roughs in schedules A and B, before we engaged in any second struggle, contested as were those sche• doles inch by inch, to the utter disgust of the whole nation,—the Morning Chronicle and its correspoes dent will at least admit that our error has been uni orm an dconaistent. From the leading article of the TiFnes dated July 26 (more than three weeks ago) we ask permission to quote the following passage:— " Numberless propositions have been made to us, with regard to those portions of the Reform Bill which may be termed the re-constructing clauses; and they will, doubtless, be well worth considering at the proper time : but, first of all, we must wit ness the administration of a complete quietus to sche dules A and B. Let not the country think of any secondary objects until after the complete demolition of the enemy's force: the important question cf county divisions, qualifications, and so forth, will then claim, and obtain, their hearing." Now here, we presume to say,is a clear indication of our policy, whether wise or unwise, and a pretty fair demonstra tion of the consistency with which we hav e a ct e d. Our cry has always • been—one thing at a time; first destroy the rotten boroughs, next save the counties themselves from dissolution. The corre spondent of the Morning Chronicle seems to wish that he could successfully insinuate a doubt of our being still cordial in our support of the Bill. Why, how puerile and unworthy is such gabble We oppose the division of counties, because that di vision, as we conceive, would be fatal pro taut°, to Reform. He who sets up a new line of county landmarks —who blunts and confounds the old eq.), it du corps of the county,—who perplexes every man in the county upon the question whether a requisi tion for the county meeting comprehends himself or not,—he who sinks the man of Kent into the East or West Kentish man, the man of Lincolnshire into one of North or South Lincoln, of Devonshire into him of North or South Devon,—he it is who goes to work directly for the enfeebling of one great ele ment of the national spirit of Englishmen, by grind ing down the masses of which our nation is corn posed,—those manses, whose sense of their respec tive interests, and *hose habits and powers of co operation for common objects, have imparted to England v, hatever she exhibit sof the genius of poli tical energy and manhood. So, by depriving one portion of the independent elective body in each county of its reliance on, and confidence in, the aid of all the rest, the Bill of Reform is not supported, but effectually undermined and endangered. It is then, as life-and-death friends of Reform, that for the sake of the Bill itself we resist these odious anomalies, which ought to be regarded as ulcers in its constitution, and as nourishing the seeds of its ultimate dissolution or degeneracy. Indeed, our whole opposition to the division of counties is founded or, the principles of the Consti tution. " Stare super antiques vies," is the phrase which Lord Bacon introduces, and recommends as the maxim to be observed in all political changes; neither is there any thing in the rest of the Bill that militates against this principle. Deserted boroughs are deprived of the elective franchise — populous towns receive it; what is there in this to create terror or even excite suspicion ? It is of the nature and essence of representation. But a new territorial division of the land savours ab'olutely of a revolutionary measure ; it is a copy (and though a feeble and imperfect one at first, may be rendered more complete and extensive in time) of the division of France into departments ; indeed, the words already tingle in our ears. Derbyshire, the depart men, of the Peak, and the department of the Der went; Leicestershire, the department of the Soar, and the department of the Welland. For our own parts we cannot away with this; and we trust there is still respect enough in the breasts of our counqymen for their old Constitution, to have the same feeling upon the subject with ourselves. If it be said that in the course of these discussions we have used vehement and angry language, why we can declare unaffectedly, in the first place, that offence to individuals, and above all to Ministers, has never been thought of by any person engaged in the active management of this Journal ; and secondly, that when the passions of three great countries are roused, and when it is indispen-able to direct them to one ex cellent and paramount end, we must pitch our voice to the level of the tempest. We cannot whisper down the conclamations of 20,000,01)0 of freemen. As for certain minor charges in the Morning Chro nicle letter, our conduct in treating the Dutch and Belgic case is open to general observation. We thought at first, and whilst trusting (not with per fect prudence we acknowledge) to ex•parte state ments, that the King of Ileand had behaved with duplicity, and we said so. When better informed, we withdrew the charge, and strove to redeem our error. If the candour we exercised had been more successfully imitated, it appears to us that elle cause of truth might have suffered little wrong : but we shall stare this point more fully in another article. Then for Mr. S atiley : is it honest for any writer to assert that our frank notice of something ehich might, and which we doubt not, will he corrected in the demeanour of that young statesman, was " declaration of war against the Mcnistry ?" Mr. Stanley is not a man to partake the soreness of his anonymous partisan, who is, we suspect, some bumble underling. He has discrimination enough to distinguish between an artful sycophant and a resolute and incorrupt adviser. It is our wish to sec Mr. Stanley in a position where the spirit and fo r ce of his character may be felt ro full advantage; and it were a pity that the want or neglect of some minor accomplishments should mar him.—Times. Three officers of the American Militia, re cently convicted f desertion, were sentenced to have their faces blackened a'l over, and five rations of beef and meal hung &tient their necks, their coats turned the wrong aid out with the label "desertion" on their backs ; the p ct .. with wooden winds. and their ton ers t be furnished s words pointe:l at their backs, and thus to be dr umme d round the lines of the camp three times bareheaded, and then dismissed. LUKE DILLON will be sent off to Botany Bay next week, i ap, slitg W HITE , convicted of forgery. An account w as received on Tuesday of an at tempt tii.assassinat..l , tlle R USS IA. The state ment conveyed in a letter Tr.o)Cronstallt, dated th e 2d inst. s iwhkh mentioned that gC, as currently reported there tb*t the &armor of;Stu st sa had been shot at b y one ofhis`owta gtztrds a lsnd thi(the shot not having taken a kar tlitlat.tifflits tiiforE, tins wounded the Emperor. 7 1,10 0 .rod OZ SECOND EDITION. SUN Oi I FIOE, Seven o'clock. IMPERIAL PARLIAMEIVI THIS EVtNING. 71 1 OUSE : OF COMMONS. The Si'EAKER took his seat shortly after Throe o'clock. Mr. SADLER presented a petition fro' - ..n the inhabitar.ts Of a parish in the city of Dublin. signed, among others, by '.he Lord Mayor, pritying the House to take into its ma ll deration the state of Ireland, with a view of establishing . a system of poor laws, and describing the di3ttess and • mivety that pet varied the country,—Ordered to he printed. Mr. BAILLIE presentell ta petition from the merchants, bankers, &:c. Rtistol and its vicinity, against the Bill , now te•fo'e the House, for allowing the refining of fottign sugar, which the Hon. Metnber said tTo'uld be an ndirect means of encouraging the 'fo'.-e'iab trade. Mr. BURGE supported the . tsrayer of the petition, and said that inttepen'dent the relief which the resistance to the proposed Bill t'ould afford to the West India colonies, the cause of humanity would also he benefitted ) for the 8,11 was not only an indirect encouragement to 'the cultivation of foreign sugar, but to the cultivation of it in the foreign colonies by means of slaves. An five. MamisEat (whose name tte. could not learn) condemned the proposed Bill, 33 actuated by a most heart ' less policy. Mr. ROBINS6N moved an Address to his Majesty, pray ing Ott there he laid before the House a rettria of all orncers and appointments in the British dominions, the duties of which are rrforrned by deputy; stating the names, principslv, And deputies, the nature of the offices, the dates of the appointments, amount of salaries paid by are public, and of the sums actually received, as Jar as could be ascertained.—Ordered. Sir R. FERGUSSON presented a petition from the norchants of Lonslowderi-y, against the proposed duties on wine ; and also a petition from the distillers of London• deny, against the drawback of the duty. Lord HOWICK presented two petitions from the farmers of Northumberland and Ber Wick against the use of molasses in disttlierice ; also, a petition from ship. owners of the pat of Newcastle, resident in North Shields, agAitist the duty on marine insurances, and com plaining of the hardships imposed on them by what were termed the Reciprocity Acts. The Hon. Member also presented a petition from the planters of the island of Mauritius for a reduction of the duty on sugars.—They were read, and ordered to be printed. . . . Lord HOWICK adverted to a notice of motion given last night by an Honourable. and Learned Member oppo site (Mr. Burge) ftnt an address to his Majesty fur the production of certain documents, relstive to the emancipa tion of slaves in the Crown colonies, and entered into a statement to show that it would be excedingly inconvenient to produce a certain despatch from a Governor of one of the West India 'Arm lie hoped that under these circum stances the Hon. and Learned 3lember would have no objection so to word his motion for the address as not to comprehend that document. Mr. BURGE had no objection to the proposition of the Noble Lord, if the document in question were one of a confidential nature; if not, the duty lie owed to the colonies and to this House compelled him to put the House in full possession of all the information now in possession of his Majesty's Governmen'. Lord HOWICK could not say it was a confidential despatch, because it was not so marked ; but he was con fident that the Governor who wrote it never contemplated its being laid on the table of this linos... . . 31r. i3IJRGE felt sati,fied with the N,ble Lord's state ment, and agreed to model his motion as proposed. The motion for the Address wa. then altered and agreed to. Lnrd MAITLAND presented a petition from the Ma gistrat,s and town council of Dunbar, aglinst the use of mollaßses in distilleries. Mr. LEFROY presented a petition from the corpora tion of bashers and surgeons in Dublin, against that part of the Reform Bill which affected their privileges. Alpo a petition from the Roman Catholic Clergy of Galway, in favour of the Galway franchise. Mr. HUNT presented a petition from the Kensington and II Immersmith branch of the National Union ; the petitioners stated that Kensington and Hammer smith contained a population of twenty thousand per-one, and they thought themselves entitled to have a representative in Parliament. They prayed that all per sons who paid rates and taxes should be al'owed to vote, and that they might have the protection of the ballot.— Ordered to be printed. Ti e lioN. ME3niga. next presented a petition from John Gilbert, at present confined in the gaol of the Isle of Man, where he bad been incarcerated for eight years, upon a debt of 13/. The petitioner prayed for the extension of the Insolvent Debtors Act to the Isle of Man. Mr. HDNT also presented a petition from Samuel Fletcher, who complained of having, ever since the year I Sl5, been defrauded of a sum of 1591. due to him on account of dt awhacks, and praying an inquiry into his case. Ordered to lie on thy table. Mr. LITTLETON presented a petition from ► farmer (4 . Staffordshire, named Wakefield, praying that the In surance Duty on Agricultural Produce might be reduced two-thirds. The Hon. Member supported the prayer of the petition, and stated that if the duty had been lowered last year, nearly all farmers would have insured their property, and many of the fires which had occurred would not have taken place, for what man who wished to he revenged upon the farmers would set fire to his property if it was known that the loss, instead of falling on the farmer, fell es the insurance company ? After a few ohservations from Messrs. Whitmore, Ben nett, Robinson, 'Western, and Hunt, the petition was laid on the table. Sir JOHN SEBRIGHT presented a petition from the land owners of Bishop Horford, against the use of mollasses in the distilation of spirits. Mr. BYNG presented a petition from St. James's, Westminster, auainst the Vestry Bill. Mr. O'CONNELL presented petitions from various parts of Ireland, against the grant to the Kildare-street School, and the Sub-letting Act; and also fur the intro duction of poor laws into Ireland. Mr. WESTERN presented a petition from the land owners of Colchester againrt the use of molasses in the distillation of spirits; also a similar petition from Saffron Walden. Mr. HUME moved for a copy of the Report of the Commissioners of Legal Enquiry on the Claims of Lescene and Escoffery in 1826 and 1827. He did so for the pur pose of enabling the House, before it sanctioned the pay ment of 16,0001. the sum awarded to those two indivi duals for injuries they had received, in consequence of being removed from the island of Jamaica by the Governor, to asnertain whether these parsons had been unfairly de It with. If that were so, he (Mr. Hume) did dot see why the people of England should be called upon to pay so large an amount, because the Governor of this colony had dealt harshly with these persons. He felt quite sure the House would never vote so large a sum of money for such a purpose ; at least it would take care, before it did so, to see that Government had taken all the mea sures to get the money from the party who ought to pay it if it was due, namely, the Governor of the colony, the Duke of Manchester. Mr. HUNT seconded the motion. _ Lord 110 WICK objected to the production of the papers, on the ground, that if they were produced more would be required, the production of which would be attended with a heavy expence, and would kid to no practical result. The Government of this country were pltdged, and there fore the money ought to be paid. There was not a case strong enough to warrant the House to call for papers, as they would, by so doing, entail on the country an expence of between 5 0001. and 6,0001. Mr. HUME said his object was, that h tying the pa pers laid upon the table of that House, they should be re• ferred to a Committee up stairs. The expense of copying them would not exceed fifty pounds. Lord HOWICK said, that unless with a view to being printed, there could he no practical end accomplished by the production of these papers. Mr BURGE contended that if this case was to be made the subject of discussion in that House, it could only he discus•rd, in fairness to all concerned, up , in the produc tion of all the papers and documents on the subject. Dr. LUSHINGTON begged to state the case with re gard to these individuals. It appeared that in Octobei, 1823, being then resident in the island, they were ar rested by order of tie Government. Upon which they sw-fd out a writ of Habeas Corpus, claiming to be considered British subjects. The Supreme Court de cided that they were entitled to be so considered, and they r tb ep e o ir rte d i e l f r i, :be a i n r d co t n ti d e u y et w , e u re fit p h o o t ut oo cal were lib e r a t e d. A S ecret C omm i ttee a f terwar d s sa t an d b li o n a g rd on a thahemip anti carried to St. Domingo, wi hoot having an opportunity of moving a second time for a Habeas Corpus. Thee inquiry, at were afterward s t h e subject of at the request of the late Mr. Canning, bytii Government at home, and the result was that the ;oluals were entitled to redress. Now he (Dr. L.) wot — xid state why he opposed the Huvourable Member's motion. It appeared that the whole subject had undergone the most complete and ample investigation, and a decision had 'wen arrived at. This House could not institute a proper ex amination by the production of tht report on evidence, but it would he absohaely necessary that all the docuthents ,hould also be produced. And the House could not then come to any decision in a less period than sit or seven weeks. He therefore hoped tbP motion would not be per severed in. _ 111 r. 1-1031 E said his object was not to deprive these indi viduals of compensation, but on the principle that he op posed any grant without having the most accurate infor mation on the subject. It r.ppared to hint that the House could hot possibly agree to so novel grant, s giving 16,000/. away without the meet; nary documents. At the same time, if it were under stood to he against the wish of the lleuse, he would not press his motion. 13U'l - . when the grant came before him, he shotAd take the sense of the House upon it. It ought to be shown that means had been us, d to OA tin compensation from the colony by which the individuals were injured, and that those means had failed, before they were called upon to make the grant in question. The lion. Member then withdrew his motion. FOREIGN TRADE. Mr. ROBINSON rose to make the motion of which he had given notice, for an Address to his Majesty for copies of correspondence with the Consul General at Paris relative to the duties on British vessels in the ports of France subsequent to the Convention of the 26th of Ja nuary, 1830. The subject was certainly highly important to the commercial interests of this country. By the reciprocity Treaty, as it was of the 26th Jan. 1526, made with France, it was stated, that from and after the sth of April of that year the ships, goods, wares, and merchandize, should be admitted into the ports of both nations at the same rates of duty. There cer tainly could be nothing fairer, nor more equitable than that treaty. But he wished to call the atten tion of the Heuse to the marked difference in the conduct of France as co , epared with that of other Powers with whom similar treaties had been contracted. and he would show that the French Government, in the spirit, if not letter, violated it from its commenceinetit. One articl e in the Treaty stated, that with a view to dimi nish the burdens on the navigation of the two countries his Moat Christian Majesty would reduce the duties in Fiance i n prop ortion to the reduction of these duties in the ports an d places of the Unit, d Kingdom. This was clearly a reference to a probable reduction of dutie s on b o th sides, but no reference was made to any probable increase of duty. It appeared when the treaty was promulgated in France on the Sth Feb., 1826, a fortnight after it was concluded in London, that it was accompanied by an Ordinance of the French Government, to which this Government was not a party, for raising the duty on French tonnage, and also on the tonnage of vessels belonging to Brtt nin. The effect was, that the vessels of England were subjected in the ports of France, to a rate of duty infinitely greater than the ditty pav ,ble in the British port , on French ship s. The French 'Government were remonstrated with upon the subj e ct, but the only answer was—that they bad adhered to the letter of the treaty. This lie (Mr. Robinson) did not deny, but lie would show, that in spirit it j had been violated The treaty was evidently with the view of dimini-hing the duties; what excuse, therefore, could the French Government have for raising the duty on tonnage on British ships ? Looking at the state of commerce in this country, it was impossible to increase the rate of tonnage, and, consequently, French ships only could have the advantage of the low rate of duty. Now one article of the Treaty was, that French goods imported into this country should pay the same duty as if imported in British b , tt , ms ; he begged the Noble Lord opposite to look at thedifference between the commerce of the two kingdoms. The French enjoyed all the benefit of the treaty, while they excluded England from it. The Howe would probably believe him when he stated that British vessels of 110 tons burthen, entering a French port, p tid tonnage duties to the amount of 20/., besides several other charges and dues, which would certainly amount to a considerable sum, while French vessels did not pay more than one-tenth of that amount. lf, however, such was the case, and he pledged himself to the fact, he would ask the House whether there was any reciprocity in a treaty of that kind. If the treaty was ever so unwise, parties were bound by it, but l.e considered the French Go vernment by their Ordinance, had annulled the treaty itself, and that view was likewise taken of it by men more conversant on the subject than himself. He consi dered such a state of things could not go on fur five years longer without some remonstrance on the part of this country to France. He was well aware that at all times it was exceedingly impolitic, and would be greatly so at the present moment, for him to make use of language against France of an irritating nature. He begged to be understood as doing no such thing, but hoe thought, if remonstrance were made in as amicable spirit, it would be received by the Government of France with a sincere desire to look into the whole transaction, with a view to give this country redress, and he protested against this country's going on year after year satisfying itself with stating the facts to the French Government, and being continually put off by evasive and delusive arguments, no man could doubt, who wou'd give himself the trouble of looking into the matter, that this county was not enjoying that benefit by this treaty which Mr. Canning and Mr. Huskisson intended it should have. If he was assured by his Majesty's Government that they had looked into the matter with a sincere desire to do justice to the commerce and shipping of this country, he certainly should net be disposed to press his motion. Previous to entering into the reciprocity treaty, French vessels returning to the ports of France never paid any tonnage duty, and he was credibly informed they did not now. If they came from any of the ports of Great Britain, then large tonnage was paid when they came from it.—(Hear.) He was not actuated by any jealousy against the French Government in making his present statements, but he considered the House ought to take care to protect its own interests.—(Hear.) The French Government had never acceded one point to us wi hout an equivalent, and be wished be could say as much of his own country. He felt ti e more anxious to ascertain the sentiments of Government on this question, when he found the Noble Lord pursuing the same course of which was called liberality, but which be begged to designate folly. He saw no objection that could by pos sibility be urged to his motion, but he would repeat that if the Noble Lord stated his Majesty's Government had the subject under their consideration, he should not press hi s motion. Lord PALAJERSTON said, nothing could be fairer than the motion of the lion. Member, and the manner in which lie had put it. He had stated that if information were given him that th-. matter was under tie discussion of Ministers, and if an explanation would now be inconve nient, he would not, lest it should embarrass Government, press his motion. Now he would beg leave to state that the matter engaged the notice of Government, that a cor respondencebetween England and France had been instituted in refercnce to it, and was still going on ; that, there fore, in his opinion, it was inconvenient, and might be preju dicial to the satisftetory determination of that correspondence if they were now c.,lled on to produce it. lie, therefore, without entering into the case, would beg him to withdraw his motion. He wound not stand up. to argue that the French had correctly understood and acted up bond fide to the stipulations of the convention, but it was from no disincli nation to give full info.mation, nor from inattention on the part of Government to the interests concerned in this question, that he would recommend the withdrawal of the motion. Mr. ROBINSON withdrew his motion accordingly, and stated that it would be extremely wrong in Go vernment to make any further concession to the French pending this correspondence. Mr. HUNT said that he would take that oppor tunity of putting to the Vice-President a question in reference to three large seizures of French silk manu factures which had been made in the city. He understood, however, that it was generally the case that some compromise took place ; but the parties in this in stance were quite competent to meet the full fines, and he wished to know what proceedings have been instituted against them. Mr. P. THONIPSON would assure the Hon. Member, that the penalty to the utmost of the law, would in this be imposed. The Marquis of CHANDOS would take that opportu nity of asking whether it was the intention of his Ma jesty's Government to disarm the Irish yeomanry? Lord ALTHORP said that measures for regulating the Irish yeomanry were under the consideration of Govern ment, and if they were considered fit to be brought before the House they would shortly be proposed; but pending the consideration of these. it would be impossible to give a direct answer to the question put by the Noble arquis. Mr. SADLER, on the suggestion of Mr. O'Connell, postponed his motion on the Irish peasantry, till Monday, 29th inst. Lori ALTH0111), :engaged that ors that day he should give him precedence of all Government bne;ne•s Mr. COURTENAY a. ,, ked when the Wine Duties should be brought before the House ? Lord ALTHORP stated that he should bring that sub ject forward on Monday nest. (.LEFT SPEAKING.) HOUSE OF LORDS. In the absence of the Loan CIIAT7CELLOR, Lord TENTERDEN took his seat on the WoolsaiA at a Quarter hefoie Pive o'clock. Mr: GRVENE and others from the Commons brought up :he Candle Duties Repeal 131111 and two private Bills. Mr. Crayford, from the Treasury, brought up the the returns ordered of the amount of British goads shipped to France within the last three years. Mr. J, hnson, from the office of the Chief Secretary for Ireland, brought up the papers connected with the late pro secution of Mr. O'Connell and others, as ordered. Earl GROSVENOR presented a petition from an indiVidual, which stated that he had been to India and back since the Reform Bill was introduced, and that he was much surprised on his return to find it still before the House of Commons. He prayed that their Lordships would pass it without delay as soon as it came before them. The Noble Earl also presented three peti tions, praying for the abolition of negro slavery. The BISHOP OF LONDON presented a petition from the parish of St. Mary's, Paddington, against a clause in the New Beer Bill. _ _ Earl - GREY moved the third reading of the disembo died Milit.a Bill—which was read accordingly and passed. . _ On the motion of Lord TENTERDEN, the Arbitra tion Bill and the Twerpleader Bill were read a second time, and ordered to be commit , ed to-morrow. Viscount STRANGFORD said, he did not wish to in. convenience the Noble Earl opposite (Grey) but he felt it would be a great convenience to him, as well as to many of their Lordship, if the Noble Earl would now give an an swer to a question which he (Lord Strangfot d) put to him on a former occasion. Ile would now repeat it, and begged to ask if the Noble E4l had yet received his Ala jesty's commands respecting the conducting of the ceremony of the coronation, and whether it was yet settled in what manner the homage of the Peers was to he pad to his sy. Another question he wished to have answered was whether the Peereses were to be deprived of their right to a procession on the occasi,.n, he hoped not, and that before it was decide d upon the case would re ceive that attention and consideration to which he con sidered it entitled. The Noble Earl (Grey) on a former occasion had found fault with his expression of un seemly curtailments in speaking of this ceremony, but be must say, that in his opinion the measures of the Government deserved the appellation, for the country would not be put to much expence, and what it had to bear would be made up in the increased activity it would cause in the manufacturing towns. He thought the economy paltry on these grounds,— that it would only save the pockets of the rich, and that the Peers miph: like it, but the manu facturers cmild not. Earl GREY said he bad not yet received his Majesty's commands on the subj,ct, and must decline answering farther. He would, however, merely st its to their Lord ships, that the ceremony of paying homage to his Majesty would he couducted in tl:e same manlier as on the occa sion of the coronation of Geroge the Third. The Marquis of LONDONDERRY was very glad to have such an as•urance from the Noble Earl, and he hoped that he would take into hi- consideration what had been stated by his Noble Friend behind him (Lord Strangfurd), with respect to the pro cession of peerages. Lord KENYON postponed his motion for the appoint ment of a Committee on the Agricultural Labourers' Bill until Monday. On the motion of Lord NlEr.eourtNE, the House went into a Committee on the Beer Act Amendments' Bill. The Duke of WELLINGTON asked, whether the Not•le Lord had introduced a clause to limit the hours of selling beer in the houses, under this Act. Lord MELBOURNE replied, he thought there was a great difficulty in having their houses closed sooner than they were at pre-ent. In the country he did not see so much objection to the hours being shorter. and a clause might be introduced that they might be closed earlier than tho-e in towns ; but the hours mention ed by the Noble Duke, say four o'clock for instance, were much too early, in his (Lord M.'s) opinion, for where were poor men then to get their beer for supper, except they went to public houses, which would render these new houses, and of course this Act, totally useless. (LEFT SITTING.) POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HO USE. A young man named Hammond was brought before the LORD MaYoe., charged with having assisted a swind ler named Elverston, who has a counting-house at No. 21, Lawrence Pountney-lane, in defrauding tradesmen in the city. It appeared, and some mirth waa occasioned by the cir cumstance, that the Lord Mayor was himself amonest those who were defrauded. Hammond was stated to have received the goods which were ordered by Elverston, and to have told the tradespeople who expected to get the va lue upon delivery, that his master had just stepped o t to the London Docks about a pipe of wine, and would pay upon his return. When Hammond found that he had got into a hobble, he offered to disclose all he knew, and it was agreed to take his evidence, and to apprehend El verston, respecting whom innumerable inquiries had been made at Lawrence Pountney-lane. Elverston had ordered two plated tea-pots at the shop of Mr. Jones, the silver smith, of Cheapside. The articles had been left at Elver- Aton's counting-haute by the porter, who was told that payment would be sent in an hour, but no money was sent, and when the messenger was ordered to call again, the counting-house was found locked up, and not a creature was to be seen except a number of tradesmen, who were waiting for the amount of their bills. Elverston was afterwards apprehended by Roe, the officer, and charged with having stolen the tea-pots, but he said that he had no idea of any thing of the kind, and was ready to produce the articles, which it was his inten tion to pay for if they happened to be such as would suit him. The tea-pots were forthcoming, and Roe brought them, along with Elverston, to the Justice-room, where they were claimed by Mr. Jones. Hammond said that he had been engaged by the pri soner at a guinea a-week, to take in messages and goods ; that many tradespeople had called at the counting-house, and that all he had ever received from Elverston was one half-crown for his services. 1 1 The Loan MAYOR —Was any money found upon El verston ? Roe—Yes, my Lord ; I found upon searching him two farthings. The Loan MAYOR—Prisoner, you have not found this swindling as productive as you expected. What are you?-- Overston said, that he was a merchant, and never meant any thing but what was honour dale ; the strongest proof of which was, that the tea-pots were given up by him at once, and had never been pawned or offered for sale. He really meant to do every thing in a regular mercantile sort of way. The Loan MAYOR—Oh, you did, did you ? I think I had the pleasure of being favoured with your custom once?—(A laugh.) Elveraton-1 don't recollect, my Lord. I don't think you and I did business together. The Loan MAYoR—We certainly did, although not with my wish or knowledge. Don't you recollect calling at my warehouse in Ai church-lane, about a quantity of pap-r which you was going to ship ? Elverston—Ab ciao ch-lane ? No, Ido not think I did, my Lord. I believe I did not. Let tee see; no, I believe you will find that I did not. The Loan MAYOR—Oh, yes; you called, and said vou had a large shipment of stationery to make, and you re quested, in my absence, that samples should be sent to L a wrence-Pountney-lane. The samples were sent, but we never heard more about you till this affitir brought you before me. Elverston—l am really not aware of it, my Lord ; nor can I charge my memory with such a transaction. The LORD MAYOR-.-1 remember that when I was told of the immense shipping order, I said a shark was at work, and I was confirmed in my opinion upon sending to your c ounting-house, for it was besieged by tradespeople. Is there any laody else here who has been de ding with Mr. Elverston ?—A young man named Barrett, the shopman of Mr. Simpson, the linen-draper, stated, that Elverston had on Saturday ordered a piece of linen which was to be paid for on delivery. The linen was by mistake left by the messenger at the counting-house, and the messenger told to call again; but neither linen nor money had been seen since by the shopkeeper. Roe, the officer, said he had found the duplicate of a piece of linen upon Elveraton's person. The Loan MAYOR—Is there any body else here with a charge against Mr. Elverston ?—Elveraton looked round him, and said, " No, my Lord, these are the only things that can be breathed against me, and these I am able to answer. It was never my intention to do anything wrong." Roe said he believed if the case were postponed to Sa turday, a good many customers would wear. The (wont- ing-house was taken s a means of blinding the trades. people. The Loan MAYOK then ordered that the prisoner should be remanded till Saturday, and expressed a hope that the victms would not fail to attend. GUILDHALL Elizabeth Risher, a middle-aged woman, was put to the bar on Tuesday, charged by her husband with being dis orderly. The husband said he had to complain of her getietal Misconduct ; she was in the habit of getting drunk every day, and the had not been sober sines Sunday morn ing. (In Monday night, or rather early on Tuesday' Inton ing, she clawed him, and he was oblig. d to give her into custody. Sir CL A UDIUS BUNTER (aside) —Clawing—that is chimney-sweepers' work. The husband explained—His wife hit him in tie face. Sir CIA UDIUS—What is your condition in life? Hus band—l am employed at an upholsterer's. Sir CLAUDIUS—Cannot you keep your wife quiet? Husband—No, Sir, she behaves extremely iii. Site comes home drunk at all hours. Sir CLA untus—l doubt whether I can assist you. What have you to say to this, Mrs. Biker ?—The tribe replied she had not been ou'sidc the door. Sir CLAUDIUS—He does not charge y , u with being outside the door, but being drunk inside the door. Wife— Nobody knows the life I have. Sir CLAUDIUS—No, nor the life he has. poor fellow. Wife— He turns me out, and I am aliged to put my clothes on in the street. Husband—Why she drinks so, she never li irdly takes her clothes off. . Sir CLAUDIUS (mournfully)—Vour story is truly pitiable. What can I do? (pausing). Was she seen in the street? husband—No, Sir. _ _ Sir CLAIDIUS—Mind ye. If she was only drunk at home I cannot interfere. Many per.on4 do that, and the 314gistrates have no power to interfere with them. If she had been drunk in the streets that might have been a breach of the King's peace, and I might have sent her to Bridewell. . . . The wife denied the fact that she was drunk. She had not tasted a drop. The officer said she was decidedly drunk when he ap. prehended her. Sir CLAUDIUS—Then not having taken a drop she was drunk.—(A laugh.) Well, Mrs. Bisker, I shall discharge you this this time without stopping to inquire wheV‘er you had taken drops or not; but if ever you ate drunk again from taking drops, or any thing else, and you should be brought here, I will send you to Brid, wed, remember that —With this admonition the pti.oner was discharged. B 0 W- S T REE T. A young fellow named William Hunt was yesterday charged before Sir R. BIRNIE with having assaulted and robbed a tradesman named Robert Wagstaff. lie was fully committed to t ke his trial for the robbery at the next Ses sion,, Old Bailey. UNION-HALL. Yesterday Mr. Barr, a gentleman of fortune, resident a► Wackhesth, was summoned by the parish officers o' New.. ingtoit, to Ita , e an order of affiliation in tde upon him fur the maintenance of an illegitimate child. _ Jane Levi stated that Mr. Barr wa- the father of the child she then carried in her arms, and that it WWI now three years and a half old. The Magistrate (Mr. CHAMBERS) inquired the reason she had not sworn the child before, and in reply she said that the defendant assisted her in a pecuniary way until the last eighteen months, since which he had not con tributed to the support of his own ntr.pring-- An attorney, on the part of the defendant, said that his client admitted having been acquainted with Mr.. Levi about the time she stated. At the period of their ac quaintance she was not tnarried, but a Mr. Levi, who was in the habit of continually visiting her about the same period, married her, when she was some months enceinte of the child produced in Court that day. The attorney contended that Levi, the husband, was the father of the child, and not Mr. Barr, the defendant, who would pro duce documents to show that a conspirac✓ was formed against him by Jane Mellership (the present Mrs. Levi) and her husband, for the purpose of extorting motley from hint. _ The defendant here handed the Magistrate a bundle of papers, and directed his attention to one which pm ported to he a lett r from Mrs. Levi, addressed to him, stating that the writer cv.is extremely sorry for having sent so many previous communications ; that .he was sati•fi: the child was not his, and promising faithfully never to trouble him more upon the subject. Mrs. Levi declared that she was not the writer of the letter alluded to ; and for th© best of reasons, she was no scholar, and could neither rrad nor write; therefore, she disclaimed all knowledge of the epistle. The defendant said that he was convinced the letter was the joint production of Levi and his wife : he was the writer to her dictation. Levi, however, WAR not present, and the question as to whether he was the writer could not he then ascertained. _ Mrs. Levi, on being asked whether she wax acquainted with h. .r present husband at the time she had stated the intrigue was going on between her and the defendant, re plied in the affirmative; but on being pressed to answer whether Levi and she wire in the habit of sleeping with each other at that particular period, she 3 tid that it was so long ago she could not now answer the question, but at all events she knew Mr. Barr was the father of her child. Mr. CFIANIBEHS-How is it possible for you to say that Mr. Barr is the father of your child, when you now ad mit that you forget whether Levi was or was not in the habit of having intercourse with you at the very same time ? Mrs. Levi, in reply, said that if a female was in the habit of encouraging visits of different men, she could always fix up n th” right fath,r. This answer caused a great deal of laughter. She added, that if the investiga tion wss postponed, she would be enabled to bring forw:trd satisfactory proof that the defendant, and he only, was the father of the child. In reply as to whether she and Levi were now living together after all that had happened, she said that they were, and that he made a very good husband. She, how ever, did not like to ride a free horse to death, and thought it ton bad that he should be at the expense of maintaining another man', bastard, ang that was the sole reason she had come forward now to take that burthen off his shoulders. Agreeably to the wish of the parties, the further hearing was postponed until Friday. Their Royal Highnesses the Duchess of KENT and Princess VICTORIA honoured Newport (Isle of Wight) with a visit on Tuesday, and received an address from the Corporation, to which the Duchess made the f o ll ow i ng re ply Mr. Mayor and Gentlemen,—l b eg leave to thank you, fur the Princess and mre:f, for the loyal sentiments you express to us, as Members of the Roy .1 Family. I also seize this occasion to state, that we are most grateful for the affectionate reception we have received from all classes of his MAißs•rv's subjects, on our visiting the He of Wight. I may observe, in reply to the conclusion of your address, that the confidence the country has reposed in me is most dear to my heart—to continue to merit it is the object of my life ; and the only return I can make is to do my best to bring up my daughter so as to fit her, in every respect, for the station she may fill in this great, free, and enlightened country." And, on re ceiving another address from the inhabitants of the town, her Royal Highness said—" Gentlemen,—As it is ex.- tremely gratifying to the Princess and myself to receive the kind assurances you convey to us, on the part of the inha bitants of the town of Newport, of their attachment and satisfaction at our coming to the Isle of Wight, and as you have just heard the sentiments I have expressed to the Mayor and Corporation, with regard to my individual feelings, in relation to the country and my daughter, I will not further detain you than to say, our hearts are peculiarly alive to the reception the inhabitants of the town of Newport have given us to-day, and that the loyalty and 'vat m feelings you display towards us, as Members of his MAJESTY'S family, are most acceptable to us." Their Royal Highnesses went to West Cowes on Friday, and paid a visit to the Duke and Duchess of NORTHUMBERLAND. The paucity of coroueted equipages in the Parks on Sunday indicated the close of the " fashionable" winter. Amongst the few equestrians of rank we re cognised the venerable Earl of WrsTstortzLANn. The fashionable company assembled in Kensington-gardens in cluded few of the leading Nobility, except Lord and Lady MustsTßa, and Lord AUGUSTUS FITECIARENCIC. A NATURAL LIFE 'Cite. — S ome years ago, a small farmer who did husbandry on the borders of the Grampian., and who, like Tarn O'Shanter, got too often gracious with change-house landladies, met with a slight misfortune one " fearsome night,' by falling from his horse and breaking his neck. Ile left a widow with a large family, who were in consequence of the father's death reduced to great distress. The widow called on the landlord of the farm, a great proprietor, not twenty miles from Montrose, and stated that she had no means of sup porting herself and faini!y, unless he would grant a short lease of her late husband's farm. The landlord an swered that all his farms were life-rents, and that his estate was entailed, therefore he could nut grant her re quest. " But my husband was killed," said the afflicted widow. " Oh, let me see," replied the laird, " Well, let your oldest son have his father's life-rent of the farm !" Scotsman. THE MARKETS. COAL MAR reaumont.....--.- 265. Oct. Rensham Main --- '24 0 Dean's 25 6 liebbnrn Dia n iiol y Kenton West. 27 3 Killingworth N 9 Pe,aw ;Kl.—Aug. 17. Walls End Newmarch,. 97 6 •, 9 , Ditto Perkins and ; Walk End Riddell - 29 6 Ditto IValkel - Larribton Primrose --- 3 0 ; Primrose Main _ -72 4 ; Walls tud Hetton 31 Walls Ent I anthton_.- 31 4 Walls End Lyons --- 0 6 Walk End Stewart's 31 vv E. Russell's Hetton 31 ; W E. Cle 4 .Mland Hetton 2' Walk End Tees--; . 11 1 Cowen 0 0 Walls End ~,,, 25 , " Loctigelly Splint------'2 5 New Flockton, and 9, '• I S s i o l i k t s h t 00 E , ol Tanlield Moor 2 7 'lees Walls End small 29 Callerton small _.--- : 7 Russell's Hetton small 11 1 Walls End small --- Stobart small sold. 67!si —l3 nsolT Pontop 2: - ) 6 ratitiel4 27 6 25 fi 2 , 3 3 2) fi W llington VVylam—. Wall , End Bell & C 0... 2t-I a Ditto Bewicke and Co. 2) :3 Walls EA 26 9 D Ito Burraton 26 9 Wall -1•:n. I Caller rn-- 24 0 ‘Valls End ,r 'll.ll . 1•. 26 0 Ditto I larl , e and Co.._ '2.5 6 Wall- End Gosiorth 211 0 Walls End 1-1-aton—...— lift 0 Walls End Hilda -- 27 6 Walls End I lotsttir— 27 0 Ditto Monkseaton....— 24 0 Ditto Northumberland 27 0 Ditto 2.7, 6 st- iv, at it rket. 113—Shi OWN IRY CUR N 'IS DU RING TH %%NV/4' Per Quarter. Abingtlon--- rt ntlover--- Birmingham ttridiort Cirencester -- Faringtion.-- .. Guildford uilev _ Y Hereford Ifighwonli Maidenhead M0wn0uth........... Reading Salisbury---- Southampton -- Stroud rewkedlAnry -- U xbridge SA:a tltage-- Warminster ---- Vintisor Worcester—. Wheat. Pat , h ats. A. to S. A. to s. S. to S. 112 S I 31 4:) t 22 30 73 84) , 37 41 72 122 40 21 :32 $6 74 j 32 89 26 3 / 57 (181 38 44 24 21 54 86 !06 40 26 35 48 74 123 32126 35 54 83 130 35 20 30 gl 92 44 45 -- 62 80 132 42 28 34 65 86 32 46 20 33 65 90 31 47 ! 2 t 32 5.1 (36 132 3f; 29 32 54 78 37 40 28 32 64 781 34 38 :22 32 65 741 40 42 1 30 38 48 78 i M 38 24 34 58 80 30 43 21 30 48 67 128 28 '25 3t) 59 1 21 22 (:4 68 !24 36 24 28 ' WO. e. 11 _ e - ~..... 0 4 0 54 - : - CHELTENHAM Per Bushel e. d. to s. d. Wheat Barley 4 0 3 6 Mutton Oats Beans Pease 3 0 7 0 La,nb A lIKET.—Aug. 16. Pe: lb. d. t° 6 5 5 6 6 5 5 6 0 Hay 3/. Ws. to Iv. Iss. pet ton. LEWES MA R K ET.— Aug. Iti, o White Wheat (per quarter—.£3 8 0 to £3 1! 0 to--„..... Red iii' , . Barley..-- ---- I 5 0 I 1 7 u , Oats, New , 1 3 0 1 7 :j . Beans., 1 14 0 1 ltLl Oil Cake, N0w...............—.............., 12 0 n p er rhoue HULL MARKET.—Aug. 16. fiel Wheat, Old —s 6C s. tZs. New -..5. :5-1 4 ~. Foreign —s. 545. 56:... ln bond... —s. - 4 f Oats, Poland --s. '....k45. '2Bs. Old —s. - .4 ' $ Small or Feed.... —s. `l4s. 21's Foreign —s 225. 24s ..„, ....s. 0 , Barley, Norf. & Sul ... —s 40s. 4'2.5. Line. & %Vold —s. :AU 0 Foreign —s. S'-'' glt Bears 'Ws. ;fi t ,. 4 0 s. Forei&r —s. i 3 . 1. Pi:an., 'Mi lle.... --s. 465. 463. (liey Tar,s —s —B. —s Foreign ...... ... —s. 3 ( ''' 0 Rapeseed, in bond n0ne.......... Free, per last --/._V.:,/ KETS —Aug. .12. Ori Wheat (bushel) —86.6 d. Barley —.-4 6 4 Oats --2 11 ; Beans ---.5 6 Better (1h) 8 1 114 e, (!S ---0 0 0 P.4atoes k) „O DUMFBIES MARKE3S.—Aug 10. EXETER 4A R Beef (score)---f 66. 9,6 d. Mutton (11.9.)--0 5 0 5i Veal and arnb--0 5 0 G Pork —0 4 0 6 Gee-e (eao h) 0 6 0 Duck, (coup c)—`l 0 3 6 1 6 6 s.d. 5.14. Wheat, Imp. Bush 7 4to 7 1 Barley 1 9 40 : Oats 2 9 3 4 Flour, 141 b. Oatmeal Potatoes, cut. e. d. Butter, I6oz 0 0 1 Eggs, dozen 0 0 'Beef, per lb. 1 )1 utton ! O Veal 0 I uartern Loaf 0 1 A correspondent informs us that the h at Waltham Abbey, in which Cardinal WoLsEr Nva' is now converted into a new hi er shop, distinguish the si.n of " The Baker and Ba•ket."—Herts Par' FEMALE SUICIDE.—On Tuesday MOO' about two o'clock, the body of a young woman, ( 16 ; attired, was discovered by J OHN ADAMS. pboet' lying in the mud adjoining the causeway at Wapping` St irs. 'The body was scarcely cold, and Anams , diately conveyed it to the station-house, where 14 , the Inspector, and GARDE and FURLONG. Serjean o. division, used every means in their power to restore !nation, and they were ally assisted by Mr. 131 ,1501 surgeon; hut all their efrinis proved fruitless, t he spark had fled. The body, in the course of the mot" was recognised as that of ANN C,tIRN, a young w0,01;,` considerable attractions, age , ' 20 years, a setvant emp , oy of 11r. Small, ship-chandler, of 126, W s / High-strcet. It appeared that on Monday afterno c4 obt tined leave of absence of her mistr.ss fur the renl of the day, and on proceeding to the West-end C , town, discovered that a young mm, who had been P his addresses to her, had married another vvorn‘P' gone to Scotland. This circumstance is supposed preyed on her mind, and caused her to commit s" struction. THE DISAPPOINTED LovER.—A man, in the ntighbourhood of Uxbridee, who 01 i moored of a young woman, and who nceived,' dresses, had banoa of mar r ia ge publi.h e d a few ago in church, without the knowledge of his and she was so much offended that she declined intercourse with him. This affected him so in wandering near a pond he fell in, and after for some time he was taken out by a man near at the time, sadly drenched, and conveyed restoratives were used, and he soon recovered. the young woman was informed of the circum' being convinced that it proceeded from disar she relaxed in her resolution, and soon after, as wife, they made their hymeneal vows at the al unchsritable gossipers in the neighbourhood c•ircuilated a wicked report, that the bridegroom the man half-a-crown to throw him into the rope fa,tened round his body, who pulled him purpose of exciting the tendre feelings of his The Birmingham Journal, And. letter in the Chronicle, asserting that 40,000 arms were to be furnish ed to Russia by the manufacturers, observes :—" Our metropolitan rary will give us credit, we hope, for paying attention to the subject which its corresponden t properly introduced into its columns. The fact last few months we have made inces.ant inquiries truth of the statement set forth in the above have bee❑ unable, from the Recresy maintao. Birmingham manufacturers, to come at the real the matter. The reason given fur this silence conveni , nee occasioned to the trade by publicity not, however, the least hesitation in stating tha n foreign contract for arms (we believe a Russian is now in course of execution." So far the of the Morning Chronicle is correct. H iv), thus much, we cannot, on the other hand, gun-manu'acturers for supplying the Russians at the present crisis, anymore than we can Yorkshire clothiers for supplying them with clo• the one and the other are, to u•e the Orate of y'ers, " goods sold and delivered" in the way of Poland has nut been able to avail itself of " v." plies drawn from this. country," it is not because nufacturers would not willingly supply them, b' such is its insular situation that arms cannot bc l in safety. The Russian ports are open to receive nufactur. s without molestation ; unfortun ,, te l P has no p rts, and all arms sent from this cone pass through territories, pledged to observe a trality. We cannot see how our Government , by the Chronicle's correspondent, could possibly , circumstances, inlerfere. We only wish the situation of unfortun ite Poised wrre different. BIRTHS. On the 15th inst. at Weymouth, the lady of C Dragoon Guards, of a 6,m. On the lt,th inst. in Charles-street, Berkeley of C. I). Halford, Esq., of a son. of On the 16th inst. the wife of W. Cortield, FM May-fair, of a son. On the 14th in6t. at Chertsey, the lady of F. J• jams of a daughter. MARRIED. To On the 13th inst. Wm. Arming, Esq.. of Ch 2 r otl Hungerfotd, %Vilt,, to Ann, daughter of the late of On London. the Pith inst. at Chiswick, the Rev. J. no 01 to Miss Maria Hansard, of Turnham.green, claug"' Major Hansard. 1 011. J On the Pith inst. at St. Andrew's, Holborn, • Esq., of Southampton, to Ellen, second daughte r( , ) e. son, Esq. of Southatnitton.build ' iiqs, Chancery-a l ' DIED. On the Ifth inst. at Stamford.hill, Sir Daniel Ito a Colonel of the Ist Royal Regiment of Tower baottice, and a Police Magistrate of Lambeth.street Police" chapel, tr ore than 8•2 years, aged 79. On the 13th m inst. at Belchester, near Coldstreant' Clair, infant sun of G. Dickson, Esq. On the 17th Md. at Alfred-place, Bedf. nl-square' IVV. the wife of Mr. F. head, aged 33. On the 14th inst. at Elan-grove, Rocharni— holes, aged 69. 0 C I ° At Sc On the 13th inst. at Southampton, Lieutenant late of the ail,t Regiment of Foot, aged 53. On the 12th inst. Miss Melville, of Torrington- R e y At Orton.on.tho-Hill, Leicester, aged tkla t more, Vicar of that parish PRINTED AND PURLISIIUD NY Al URA° °, 1 4 • SUN °PP M:, 111, Si KA t), LO NOTII co 0, Chat tteB o l, ed 1 4 : n ' tlailler derived t ,:tilsoi_ustly c. Op eni_ rt to th e tiOn hng of the and 911 ijest th e a llecti outti the arrangein€ _.Y. aehnowle goratitude the d tiz? them in a Ighity of '' ref rai ,, aIL ti on t " irotn ex v„ ti " 48 devol l th arl n 4f , h i' ruolie fip his d Ist tea their httg e'"iVe d 11[1. "f the I • on tx Pt h cor 4 d., ti: v rti "r's and Dle:,, "t ributt Prn v ; i lre of the the 6„ e ' l by tl -rPoratior t RoTHE NI" from i D na Y viev U pon 'ight i n P l Y 4 lent nn IS lin) d escent i s 4611: W alb rA I"ES U/ tia (if I,ooi LI; I N ER, Cot - ToUrgl i , at URDAY " " FSD ali . • Al, °g off Scar rAkEs (IN C C hief Cabin... Goods and -nt Circus, and Dow Be rat! every fur thi t hiderwood, Circus, thin's lane; su, vor ()their I\lBl El l'i li tEl ,e°n D e 3L O 11 1 : Prn - r Palt ron a, r 'sPe hu, 4 Elj gen era 10, rtEr r VNIt,, - tqhOf r pain ly , ur l ,l o h V k 'T[l 4t ' or'" 111 31. ig Pr 61' pAA , tt ej t 4, Iv () 1 Ati., -0 a 14 uut .4 1t. t :1 4 1; p N 4l tea "it Y ar tl l , l , strretPNrll tie o f on Ai — itr e et g a , Leo „t y few voods and P tt his s" er t i; Feet and D Inclined 9 ow so no b, k til l ng• Berth! ifter gra ev er y forth, near .be underwood, t g.ent Cir cus,home/ )vered. etreet to s . lane; rumstfoli , appo i n te , . 4 0 r, as c, 'he a lto , looi hot ! ? HE ;room 119 ,, 4 , 4 4 t i t° Partic i he pond I `tol e . 5 * genet.; fo. Locks ti se I i out , . resp et is .weetl;: w ith l'itlere se aces T he guars ,ts,i V4ltlable s 0,000 d P o . he Biag i / th 4 t tctin j, int „.i lIMn Co n If 1 pondept I ..ueli u a r.° l gi e fact 0, 0, the_ rprivate rte 4 to: es wh uirief q erN Mer n y t e ai e nea l' as as to th, tr o , g on, Will ie real 'lOO et the Ar on ene ° Ve y ! 'jetty. in g that O' ust,lao ": 0 1: 11,N Cli ,utror t , JA AI iu- t° l tit] th e m Lio , Gs it , r/0 . D i it 444 tit 'U LTU an cel o f Y r , of SE, c lothet eck,„`-113T H ” Pri •at oftoi dti oe en 4e nt i, aia ( ZV,tt their 01: t e r, lat )ecau 9 e .„ USES OMEN but ,4/ t i 7tr e , , TE N . ] t be tr aP oij r receive y , , n ,,telY , 4) , e 4l ,„ _ o f PT, qt , . 1 . 0 ( eo ve a ' u tis ens , n t, 3 ,6 ,0 01 he ; full, r op ts "fr th e ils esl ,he geogstreet. T ot. Nt h eAvvik,l-. TEE ,_Oll / .,`"'" TEE c: a ptAin ivi r '`ODu) c e woe' 0 t other