The Sun. — London, England, 1831-11-26 00:00:00

--, ‘4 ‘7 °L L97-z.1,-(Z-e,) ,?) •fh. ~. • • . , .Ali SEARLE ON CHOLERA. This day was pulAislied. price 2s. bd. I , ltl OLEitik, its NATURE, , CAUSE, TREATMENT, and•PREVENTION, clearly and I3ely explained. BY CHARLES SEARLE, - Esq. 7 Hon. E ast India Company's Madras Establishment, l ately in charge of the Principal Cholera Hospital Second Edition, Revised and Enlarged. rimed fo r S. Hi , 111 e Fleet-street, and Webb nd, Borough. . dp h ALTER SCOTT'S TALES of a GRAND -6CI, First, Second, and Third Series. New Editions : SCI . And HISTORY of FRANCE. lOs. 6d. DALGAIRNS' COOKERY, New Edi- ON HEALTH AND LONGEVITY. At e ) ON CHEMISTRY. }' Published i n 121 no. Third Edition, enlarged, Ith)price 9s. boards, " ' H E , METHODS of IMPROVING tt' tl' ALTH and PROLONGING LIFE, by re to' e Diet an d R eg imen : embracing all the most tll Principles of Health and Longevity, and exhibit kPettlarkable power of roper Food, Wine, Air, Ex -1 (t, in the Cure of obstinate Chronic Diseases, as ad c i pd in Promoting Health and Long Life. To which an account of the Art and excellent Effects of ti t ,: c 'or Health, Rules for reducing Corpulence, and the Bilious and Nervous, &c. Illustrated by By T. J. GRAHAM, M.D. &c. 44x1 are disposed to think it the most useful and 'by L;: ark of th e ki n d we h ave me t with. It contains I de 4/5 novel to us, and is altogether an adtnirable ( Ti t Sept. 1827. lett, e t endency of this volume to advance the important Which it proposes is unquestionable, and we 1 4. }n r er e e t o s na tin m g e . nd it. It is intelligent, practical, and "—New Literary Gazette, Sept. 1827. in en of all habits will derive information from h, • ated to i ncrease the i r com f ort an d exten d th eir 'lB 4 2 B ! rm lY our conviction."--Edinburgh Observer, 1 ° thi s !A ce Edition is atta c hed an Appendix, containing a tal t :; n b e ? i f the Cholera, with the best Remedies, as dise ase, Y " ?} 7sioians of the greatest experience in that 4'don P u isoed by Simkin and Marshall, Stationers'- sol d by all B oo k sellers. i "I may be had, lately published, by the same )r, Second Edition, in 1 large vol. Svo. price 16s. Awith Engravings, e meats - , EMICL CATCHISM ; in which te of hem Chemistr A y, with all the recent Discov er i es , ar h e dear ly and fully explained, and its applications to the aof Nature, to Agriculture, Manufactures, and described. Illustrated by Notes, numerous En- Select Chemical Experiments, and a Vocabulary '' lt eett and recommend it. Every subject of interest, , w ith this delightful science is treated of in the y-nanser.". -L ondon Weekly Rev i ew. F e b. 21, 18/9. ' N " et Y th ing is here written up to the latest date, s o t cannot fail, we think, of being found eminently The more important facts are exhibited with re • clearness, and the author has completely sue 14;,UPPIYing the defects of Mr. Parkes's book."— ngazine, Ist March, 1829. .• e necessity of a clear, progressive view of che f( h obvious and the want of such a treatise has long eitily students. Dr. Graham lass well supplied the 4 a book is systematic and comprehensive, per ‘. in it s p l an, and extensive i n i ts compass . Unlik e 44 „ ai a) it does not confound and complicate the a n N, of the science, but ascends from the first "d simpl e e l emen ts to the compound and illus. ) r . 44, /les of the study. It is very superior to Ist March, 1829. 1 1 4 1 1 1 , SI 'S IMPROVED ELIXIR PAREGORIC. PAREGORIC ELIXIR is umver -4111 lali„ "steerneu an excellent Medicine for Colds and t its h Yet at th e same t i me it h as it s i nconvea i enc i e s, b ein 'ine d with oth er reme di e s. In some constitutions - I" costiveness, hinders expectoration, and fre iter allaying Cough leaves a troublesome Hoarse- Dixon's ap tion which bas been used 0 1 1 ?.rActic e of many rear y a e . ars ' with most decided suc hen gates these inconveniences, and prevents any un 4edy f ati. cmi thereby rendering it a safe and unparalleled ‘ ! „ t e Cou g h s and Colds. In Spasmodic Affections f ee and Gums this Medicine has the most decided %I ( j 4 i e ffect. CI, II /iottl es at 2s. 9d. and 4s. 6d., by Messrs. But t4rCheapside, corner of St. Paul's, and the "altle Dealers in Patent Medicines. ui xo Of whom may he had, ig A N 'S ANTIBILIOUS PILLS, which do not a le rcury i n any s h a p e , a n d have met with more l P'"al than any other Medicine. In Boxes, at 6,1 ., I Is., and 225. OSs, New and Improved Editions. S WORKS. (Twentieth Edition ss. each. 1, THE EGIS OF LIFE. , " Homin e m pagina nostra sapit." lion_l(‘)ur Page relates to men.".—MARTIAL. frp rri Medical Commentary on the indiscretions aris like ffec 1114 min Frailty, in which the nature, symptoms, t:4lets of Self-abuse, Intemperance, and Liber -04 sc.> al are fully developed ; with Practical Observe at. Debility, and Mental Irritation, with some ate II Observations on Vegetable and Animal Life ; ' 18 a series of Cases illustrative of the preceding fly Q,..,' l Plaini ng them in a familiar manner. ' B B and C o ., Consulting Surgeons, London. "kuib "Natures beatis. s s i u "e dedit, s i qu i s cog noverit 2. r 'ee Heaven to all the fund of bliss supplies, The 5 , f c, 11 41 application marks the wi . se." rf , PHILIST, a Familiar Treatise on Disorders ' 41 41 ' 4l Lues Venerea, Gonorrhea, Stricture, Seminal es % it a variety of remarks occurring in a .ice, eachaection explained by cases. A, a Non-Medical Analysis of some ital. to Females, as Leucorrhcea, Nervous .hick are offered some important adino :uliar debilities attending their circutn lies, and formation. The subject of Illy dwelt upon. Interesting and impor t the subject. ius ? Heu ! quove color decens ?" HOR. Lib. 4, Od. 12. Love ? Ali ! where the charming bloom?" be bad of Sherwood and Co., Pater ; 86, Trongate, Glasgow ; 9, Calton ; Wrightson, Birmingham ; Duffield, Reid, Bristol; Weller, Cheltenham; Wood, Huntingdon; Hatt, Cambridge; ; Bacon and Co., Norwich ; Deck, 1, Leeds ; Gore and Son, Liverpool ; iheffield ; Sowler, Manchester ; Shatter, and Dowding, Salisbury ; Oxley, Wind- Booksellers. Price ss. each. and Co. are to be consulted, as usual, house ; and Patients in the remotest `try, can be treated successfully on de che case, and enclosing a remittance for seine which can be forwarded to any par difficulty can occur, as the medicines lacked and carefully protected from ob- M. R. e. Surgeons, No. 11, Bouverie- Leaden. ,nger o r o te I LII IRARY OF MODERN FICTION. the p: ttis :t yo be ., p ee ri m re be :n ve y i 6 lt s b : e pe p r ub v l o i l s u h m ed e , , inFiftyneatly b o N u r( n )l d u , m es )lanatl ~ f-1 MODERN NOVELISTS; f i the, S ELECTION of the BEST RECENT WORKS s peCt z tri _ , from the Pens of the most Eminent Authors ; iy tOt or af „, c h will be found Works of Mr. Ward, (the co iA 1 , 4 e i l remaine), Mr. Lister, (the Author of Granby), 4 1 ,1: e ° re Hook, Mr. Horace Smith, Mr. Grattan, I for ;„, t :. -ar the Bcc liti & p e refigion of this cheap and unique Col- )e t.tkrin'' the to 250 copies, thot.e who are desirous of talc; I A, to .. h set, are requested to transmit their orders forth- cal 11:11it.,eir respective Booksellers. be 011 4 1 .7 for Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley, New t ,..„ ... z .........1 . 1tr.eet. ;Itild° 4 1110„ , , be l? ; LI OF WAVERLEY'S NEW WORK. ; " ti ist i t., In a very few days, Four VOlumes, [so I ‘,'UNT It 1. ROBERT of PARIS. A Ro- mance. le am ° i b . '„,CASTLE DANGEROUS. A Tale. Ireadi . 6 lALES OF MY LANDLORD, Series the 1 i t Fourth and Last. o • uiretlflilttedl3, lory the AUTHOR of WAVERLEY. i b;ecti 4 V A , Robert CAdell, Edinburgh; and Whittaker j lt ) London. nsME 1 tit s who have lately published, Board/ ,r All • 11 1 8 1" 6 ' d . By the Author of " Marriage." suffe r N: B ir . ' 1 ti.— W ALTI7P Crwrrs TALES of a GRAND- 0 ' 144 . ; In ay be had, lately published, by the same EiyltAo eird ' Second Edition, in 1 large vol. Svo. price 16s. pert ', With Engravings, .. , ts CHEMICAL CATECHISM ;in which the ' t° '''ts la of Chemistry, with all the recent Discoveries, are 5 t 41 Y and fully explained, and its applications to the i ' e r ' 6 , 444 of Nature, to Agriculture, Manufactures, and :3. ` v'-'4, describ e d Illustrated by Notes, numerous En- :3l) lbg't S 1e • i "s E •and Vocabularyl 3,5 , e r ,.., elect Chemical _xperiments, a gg k z ,,, , . ,i .and recommend .V e t "t"al '" ly " 1 1 thin delightful science is treated of in the 44) • on „. • 4 to e ,. •,7- •-London Weekly Review. Feb. 21, 1629. -s - l'it, t r. Y t ulq is here written up to the latest date, a. id 41 ,1 k cannot fail, we think, of being found erninentl) :35 • T 14 lesi A he more important facts are exhibited with re. j fti iitgleci - e clearness and the author has completely sue- t 41 • ' ' fsi'' "4 POP/1g the defects of Mr. Parkes's book."— :: t ti: o ) ,C 4l t. i ` Ma gazine,ll' e Ist March, 1629. '.. t° :;* l- ‘ 4 9 is necessity of a clear, progressive view of clie. 14. r o oks fait obvious, and the want of such a treatise has lon{ ;:: toe i tH t. PY students. Dr. Graham has well supplied thi is. to'„ertlio N l is book is systematic and comprehensive, per i 2 3:4 pet d ' i li l N t. et k 4 a t a r its plan, and extensive in its compass. Unlik, 2: 1 : j.V '° l lll Y l ") it does not confound and complicate th , : t :ati b i P a rts of the science but ascend from the firs >v.''' . ctt 11 " and • ' s ound and illus 3 d.toi ii 4 're L i. simple elements to the comp 'lte' t .. a4 ches of the study. It is very superior t 6 l i t je t . --- Atlas, Ist March, 1629. , kov 1 ' 4 TI- 1 /3''S IMPROVED ELIXIR PAREGORIC. 4.. T: i t :''' i PAREGORIC ELIXIR is utaiver il 9 5 tkh, -44 Y esteemed an excellent Medicine for Colds an i 6 O ) E kes ja Yet at the same time it has its inconveaienciet 45 4 :t i . ti l :!is o 4l o e ., c l with other remedies. In some constitution e 4 tlY mt.: costiveness, hinders expectoration, and li fee O 0 . i;' r allaying a Cough leaves a troublesome oars( 0 0 44 0 iti ti llg k ',,, r ' . Dixon's preparation, .which has been use 0 ,41 . 14 1 ,'."sctice of many years with most decided sue o iii .te ty 44.,aten these inconveniences, and prevents any ur ( ft ;o r t r4 t t i dy i o a r ti°l )) thereby rendering it a safe and unparallele o tt 'e F A Cough s and Colds. In Spasmodic Affectior 0 0 It t k qt eiaj t e e ffe ar 'd Gums this Medicine has the most decide , y. 0, el tr ,rd in et. 114' Ch Boyles at 2s. 9d. and 4s. 6d., by Messrs. Bu ' )49 •1 1 /' 4 t t e , lli ltse Cheap side, corner of S. Paul's, and ti ........., 'Notable Dealers in Patent Medicines. t it' u blx, Of whom may be had, ' 2.)... 1 °11 °1 ; 6 4 t kis — i'S ANTIBILIOUS PILLS, which do n t k et t i a e rcury in any shape, and have met with mo 51 . P e r nval than any other Medicine. In Boxes, 0 ; °l g - --- ' -1, 6 ...L ... _ 1 " 1", and 225. .. 3 l i .V.()s, New and Improved Editions. '' t° ' 13' S WORKS. (Twentieth Edition bs. each. P r cry r .' 1. THE JEGIS OF LIFE. Of, 4, " liorninena pagina nostra sapit." :ort i P e; ;A N Our Page relates to man."—Ma wrisr.. 6 r ini e ri t 6 lft 64- Medical Commentary on the indiscretions ar I N r 4 H uman Frailty, in which the nature, sympton 5 11 . 0 e vi . tl l l :41 %3 1 ' 1)41 ' f t , ' effects of Self-abuse, Intemperance, and Lib, tbs 11 1, " I ts, ' & • ii i op t 04 s c.) are fully developed ; with Practical ()biers ` he e l odts . t leeti n "nal Debility, and Mental Irritation, with soi ' t " i v i , b' : _st f Obstrvat'ons on Vegetable and Animal Lif .d in s ta dde 4 P i lti T e . te t , l ;;,, i4 ,.. a „s.eries l . of Cases illustrative of the precedi r • oIV 0 1 - • ease dedit Frig' r 1 0 d ace fru Heave, e v 8 0,4 i Th, S Y P gal api f ro HIL wo vv et , 4l a t , a LUeB V nil tb i;lP l . eltt "'', Witt dot , ' ott.. 14 41, re practi a t eo d Aiy t Tlleident; be P re ;Oat:''as g e• in l o and 0•00.et:r44, the pe cu l Prodility ” I nPathies h a.. 1 ' eapeci a ll ) ea o 1 it ci iliustrat e tit of /j in g o. fu git Venu i s cre „ lo rf° Z fl iea Loy, Leg ion' o br it ;er. eow ve may I a r's e et, Londo n th "'nhureh ° del; / 1 // ."‘ra and 1/P ; itrt v , rlght ou • Tiet.. k4,3 batu -1 1, 1 'E'leter ; fol l'i!!t 1 ,4 Tißobeoo, od . , widcot and Brodi e an in ,( "f all 13 00 F,.l) ,lt f r, t rY tl a ". G° SS , 0 13rY , at their C dr (if the Cunt] - in uteiy an tl ter e f th eie4tWorl d d. led No e ft tv atign. tu ' el Y Pal ind Cc ' se, if t) Pletuoreet.,. !mod 'd to for ; UnleSg from hick t ecaUto whic h . are )n, if stir* e ll. It)-' uid , (irk. ri pop} at d° tO, No. 12,233. LONDON, SATURDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 26, 1831. This day was published, price is. 6d. CONSISTORY COURT. mdon establishment, I have necessarily required you to me to this hotel, at which I have lived since your con et forced me to breakup my establishment in Gros- OBSERVATIONS on CHOLERA, the MODE of TREATMENT, and the means of PREVENTION. NEELD V. NEELD. (Concluded from The Sun of yesterday.) 1 ' The next article pleaded, that in consequence, as well of Mr. Neeld's total desertion of his wife, as of tenor-square, and where I shall continue to reside during my Parliamentary stay in London." " I take this opportuoity to declare, and to impress upon you, that I shall require from you that duty and (1 1 3'eclience in all things which a wife owes to her husband, tied which I am determined to enforce. By T. J. PETTIGREW, F.R S., F.A.S., F.L.S. Surgeon to the Charing-Cross Hospital, &c. Printed for S. Highley, 32, Fleet-street, and Webb street, Alaze-pond, Borough. his general treatment of her, reports got abroad to the prejudice of her character; and that in a psragraph in a periodical publication called the Satirist, such a re port was published, and in four pages of the libel this paragraph was set fortiL It was a most extra ordinary circumstance, in a suit of this kind, that such a thing should be set forth in a libel, and that the husband was to be criminated because it was al ARTIFICIAL TEETH FIXED ON THE PARISIAN PRINCIPLE, AND FILLING DECAYED TEETH WITH MINERAL SUCCEDANEUM. " Your calumnies against me hr,ve imposed upon me the necessity of withdrawing from that style of living which otherwise I should have adopted. You must be contented, therefore, to submit to that quiet and retired situation of 'l;fe to which you have subjected us; and I distinctly ap ize you, that if you persist in the extravagant and vexatious expenditure of money, which (in order to annoy me) you have lately pursued, I shall insert advertisements in all the daily and weekly prir.ts, cautioning tradesmen against trusting you on my credit. " That you should have adopted the proceedings which have given rise to the communication is much more dero gatory to you than annoying to me. You well know the .yise and slanderous aspersions you have propagated against me. If those statements had . been true, it would have )apen disgraceful in you to have sought further cohabitation me ; to have done that would have been to aTow openly that the temptation of a large income would induce vi ,, . to disregard every principle of delicacy and womanly honour, and to live with a man you ought to despise. The only other alternative for you is, that your statements are (as you well knew them to be) absolutely false; and that you would acknowledge their falsehood, and return to coha bitation with your slandered husband. That alternative i ES SRS .J. and M ALLAN, SUR v GEON-DENTISTS, 9,HALF MOON•STREET, PICCADILLY, grateful for the high and EXTENSIVE PATRONAGE which has so eminently distinguished their professional exertions since their arrival in the British Me tropolis, beg have to announce to their Friends and the Public in general, that they still .CONTINUE to RE STORE DECAYED TEETH,withtheirCELEBRATED MINERAL SUCCEDANEUM, so universally recom mended by the Faculty of London and Paris. The Ope ration is PERFORMED IN A FEW SECONDS, with out the SLIGHTEST PAIN, HEAT, or Pressure, and allays the most EXCRUCIATING PAIN, and lasting for many years ; they also FASTEN LOOSE TEETH, WHETHER ARISING from AGE, NEGLECT, or DISEASE in the GUMS. - INCORRODIBLE MI NERAL and NATURAL TEETH, from one to a. COM PLETE Set, which are INCAPABLE of DISCO LOURATION or CORROSION, and fixed without the incumbrance of Wires or any other LIGAI URES, and answer every PURPOSE of ARTICULATION and MASTICATION. Charges as in Paris. leged he took no step to prosecute the offender. He (the King's Advocate) repeated, that these facts were taken as true, merely for the, purpose of dip cus!•ing the admissibility of this libel. It went on to plead, that Mr. Neeld, though aware of the pa ragraph, took no notice thereof. He was not quite certain that this was not the wisest way of trettink it, and whet - . applied to by Lord Shaftesbury, on the propriety of vindicating the honour of his wife; 43r, prosecuting the libeller, he refused to take any stets' _ or to interfere; that Lord Shaftesbury thereupon took measures to prosecute the party, and this hay- ing come to the knowledge of kr. William Ashley, the second brother of Lady Caroline Neeld, (and here he called the attention of the Court to a most improper passage in the libel, which must hare All Operations performed on the Teeth. N.B. One of the above firm may be consulted for a short period at No. 58, Bold-street, Liverpool. crept in through the inadvertency of his Learned Friends), that gentleman being indignant thereat, in• sisted on Mr. Neeld's taking up the prosecution in stead of Lord Shaftesbury, on pain of a certain al ternative, which ➢'lr. Neeld not choosing to en counter, he consented to prosecute the libeller. It was not stated what the alternative was; but the Court must agree that this was a most improper cir cumstance to creep into a libel, and would feel in you have adopted. Your own record at Doctors'-commons establishes the falsehood of your accusations against me ; your own process is conclusive evidence against you. " But do not imagine that these disgraceful proceedings deceive me. That they were founded on any conjugal affection, or arose out of any actual desire for cohabitation, lam not so foolish as to belie% e. That they were insti- THE CHOLERA MORBUS. tuted with ulterior views I well know. But be assured that Persons interested in the coal trade are busily employing themselves in keeping up the alarm about the cholera. In the Coal Exchange to-day these gentlemen, we understand, did their best to keep up the game, but, notwithstanding all their efforts, coals are rather lower. By the way, the official doctors at Sunderland appear to be determined to make the best of their appointments. They are evidently (no doubt quite unintentionally) excellent abettors of the speculators in coals and drugs. It is not indeed surpris ing that they should look upon the disease with some ne gree of favour, or, at any rate, with very different views from those of the public at large. To the doctors the cholera may be considered as a regular God-send. They not only make money by it, but, what is to many of them of quite as mach consequence, a vast deal of fame. Who would ever have heard of Dr. Daun, of Dr. Gibson, of Dr. Russell, and of many other doctors, if the cholera had not brought them into notice? We would wish, how ever, that these gentlemen, for their own fame's sake, would, in their communications to the public, pay a I will take good care to disappoint those views. I will not be impelled by such acts as these to gratify the mercenary motives in which they have originated, and you shall not have any success of that kind to console you for the de gradation of character which must be the result of your spontaneous return to cohabitation with a husband whose character you have so foully aspersed. " What my future conduct towards you may be, will depend entirely on the propriety of yours towards me. " Re-peruse this letter, and then ask yourself what cause you had for the exulting exclamation you uttered upon entering my room in the morning Now I have triumphed, I knew I should bring you back to me.' " Yours, 4t J . This letter, the Learned Advocate contended, con tained no unkind caution. It was then alleged that Mr. Neeld drew up a statement respecting this suit, and caused copies to he made of it, which, though not published, were circulated amongst his friends; but this was not to annoy her; it was to vindicate his own character, which he was justified in doing. The 22d article pleaded, that the day after the re turn to cohabitation, as Lady Caroline was sitting with Lord Ashley, her brother, Mr. Neeld came into the room, and without any observation or pro vocation given, in a violent tone of voice ordered his Lordship to leave the room; that he rung the bell for the waiter so violently, that the bell broke, and ordered the waiter to turn Lord Ashley out ; and called upon the waiter to bear witness that Lady Caroline had called him a villain and rascal ; the first of which epithets her Ladyship admitted she did use in a moment of irritation. All this, if true, might be harshness, but was no foundation for a suit for cruelty. The 23d article pleaded that the apartments at Coulson's hotel were " compara tivel( dirt and ill-furnislicd, tit 4 agree-ciljt al scan gu UCLLCA , - c u pied. The 24th article pleaded that Mr. Neeld, in terms of great harshness and asperity, refused his wife the use of a britschka she had hired, and suffered her to go out in an old green chariot, the footman and coachman wearing blue trousers and boots. The 25th charged Mr. Neeld with refusing her a guinea to pay her physician's fee, which fee remained unpaid. This might be cruelty to the physician, but not to the wife. The 26th, pleaded that hlr.Neeld told her he was going into Hampshire, and that if she accompanied him, she must travel five in a carriage with a pair of horses, and wait upon herself, as he could not incur more ex pence, by reason of her extravagance in burning wax lights. The 28th, amongst other things, pleaded that Lady Caroline seldom went out, and then only to visit her family; and that on one occasion Mr. Xeeld returned home at ten o'clock, and finding her out, flew into a passion, and said that it did not follow that she was gone to her father's or her sister's, though she said so, " and much more to the same effect." Another circumstance was per fectly ludicrous. On the 9th of August, Mr. Neeld went out to dinner, first ordering his wife's, direct ing what she should eat. At dinner, Lady Caro line inquired if there was any soup, or tart, or pud ding, and was told by the waiter that Mr. Neeld had ordered that she was to have that dinner and no other. He (the King's Advocate) should like to know what the bill of fare consisted of that the Court might be able to judge whether it was Mr. Neeld's in tention that his wife should be starved. After dinner, she required the footman to attend her to her sister's; he refused, alleging he had orders to that effect from Mr. Neeld. She went out, however, and Mr. Neeld went after her, and driving in his cab to her sister's, Lady Harriet Corry, ordeled his wife to come out, and although a close carriage of her father's was coming for her, obliged her to get into the cab, rudely forcing her into the seat, and slapping down the wooden apron, to her personal injury as well as alarm. He drove at a furious rate, and by a circui tous route, although it rained in torrents, with thunder and lightning, and on her Ladyship saying, that if he did not drive straight home, she would cry out, he exclaimed, " Be quiet, or I'll be - if I don't drive you into the city !" This might be an improper threat, but there was no cruelty, for it was not pleaded that there was any marks ott her person, or that her clothes were wetted,. The next a rticle pleaded that Mr. Neeld threatened to lock her up, ading, " Such a wretch as you must stay at home ;" that he called for the keys, and, in the presence of the waiter, locked his wife up in her sitting-room while he went out. The 34th article pleaded that Mr. Neeld returned in two hours, which was the term of her confinement; that Lady Caroline then fastened herself in her bed-room, which Mr. Neeld endeavoured ineffectually to break open, calling on her to come out and make tea for him, " and more to the same effect." Lady Caroline came out, and de clared she would go to her father's, but Mr. Neeld took hold of her and dragged her into the sitting room, telling her she might go next day. The 35th article stated, that at eleven o'clock ott the same evening, Lady Harriet Corry, her Ladyship's sister, came to Coulson's Hotel, and saw Lady Caro line ; that on her departure, Lady Caroline was seeing her t o t h e d oor , when Mr. Neeld took hold of her with violence to draw her back, and left marks on her arms, which were seen by several per sons ; that he ordered two pillows to be put on her bed, as lie said lie intended to sleep there ; that her bed-room door was bolted by Lady Caroline, who lay down in her clothes, and was disturbed till two o'clock by Mr. Neeld's attempts or pretended at tempts to force the door ; that in the morning she left the hotel, and never returned; and on that morn ing the citation in this suit was served on Mr. Neeld. Here were certainly a number of petty circum stances calculated to annoy and distress Lady Caro line Neeld, who might have entertained, on her mar riage, the intention of participaitng, to the full ex tent, in the luxuries which the fortune of Mr. Neeld dignant that its records should be made the vehicle of a reflection on the character of two individuals— Mr. William Ashley, Mr. Neeld, and even of Lady Caroline Neeld herself. The 12th article pleaded that Lady Caroline came to London to negative the truth of the libel, and went to Mr. Neeld in Grosve nor-square. He (the King's Advocate) should be glad to know whether the bills in the window had been taken down, which had been the cause of so much offence to her Ladyship. In a letter which he sent to her, he objected to her remaining there; but as he offered her no other residence except a hotel, Lady Caroline persisted in residing there. That word " persisted," ha thought showed something. But here again, where was Mr. Neeld's letter ? Having ordered the carriage, she waa informed that _ _ . . le more attention to consistency , and common sense. Mr. Neeld," in anticipation of such an order," had locked-up the coach-house, and refused to let her have the use of a carriage. This, if true, might be harsh, but it was no act of cruelty; and the fact alone could be pleaded, not that it was "in antici pation." In consequence of this, (it went en) Lord Shaftesbury wrote repeatedly to Mr. Neeld, who returned no answer. Was this cruelty ? Mr. Neeld thought himself a better judge of the pro priety of his wife's using a carriage than her father. In consequence of this refusal Lady Caroline suffered great inconvenience from confinement to the house. This confinement was from the 19th to the middle of the 20th of May, or only part of one day. On the 24th Lady Caroline received a letter from Mr. Neeld, stating that he required her to quit the house in Grosvenor-square (this letter was not produced), and that she should return to Brittleton ; that Lady ?:Korcsscd, her readit , eFs. to ryn TherN. it he. wpm acco:npany ner ; out that she could not return alone, " her character having suffered by his open and ostentatious desertion of her :" ;this was a new expression, which probably had a peculiar meaning. The article went on to allege, that he threatened that if she did not leave the house by a certain day, he would send an upholsterer and unfurnish the house; and lie did so, even to Lady Caroline's bed; which was taken down ; but was put up again, the uphol sterer's man judging it was a mistake, whereas he was told of it at the time, and replied, "he knew what lie was about ; he acted according to orders." Orders from whom ?—From Mr. Neeld or the up. holsterer ? Was this cruelty ? Then it was said he had directed the porter not to wait in the hall, or dering the upholsterer's man to wait in his stead. This was too ludicrous to dwell upon. the next article pleaded that Mr.Neeld had forbidden the post. master at Chippenham to let her Ladyship have post-horses. This might or might not be harshness, but it was not cruelty ; it might aggravate cruelty, if cruelty was proved ; but such petty annoyances , could not found a case of cruelty. In this case Mr. Neeld was perfectly justifiable. He had left his wife a carriage, and if she wished to have four post horses, merely to annoy him, he had a right to pre vent it. Now, after all this series of "injuries, i n _ sults, and indignities"—for he doubted if the word cruelty appeared at all—what was the result ? Shp takes out u citation in this Court for a restitution of conjugal rights, not to pray a separation. A libel was given in ; he is advised to give an affirmative issue, and the parties return to cohabitation loge_ ther, she showing no disinclination from fear of life or health. This cohabitation, it is alleged, was only so far as sleeping under the same roof; for, so far from treating his wife with conjugal affection, Mr. Neeld treated her, from the 14th of July to the 11th of August, with great harshness and cruelty, so far as to compel her to separate herself from him, and to commence this suit. The 16th article pleaded, that on Mr. Neeld's giving in the affirmative issue, he, on the 14th of July, wrote a letter to his wife, Who was at the Pulteney Hotel, stat i ng that lie had consented to renew their cohabita tion, and directing her to come to him without delay to Coulson's Hotel, writing at the same time to the keeper of Pulteney's Hotel, de=icing him to let her have apartments there no longer. This letter was produced, and there ap peared nothing objectionable in the letter : it stated, that for reasons he should hereafter communicate, he had determined to affirm her suit in Doctors' Com mons, and to return to cohabitation : concluding "my dinner hour is seven o'clock." The 18th ar ticle pleaded, that Lady Careline proceeded to Coulson's Hotel, accompanied by Lord Ashley, and found Mr. Neeld there: Lord Ashley withdrew, and left them together. It is stated, that on Lady Caroline's asking for the chamber-maid, to show her room, Mr. Neeld showed her one, and in a surly tone said, " That is the room you are to inhabit ;" adding that he did not intend to sleep with her. This might be a ground for coming to the Court to pray that Mr. Neeld might not be dismissed from the suit for restitution of conjugal rights, but it was no act of cruelty. The next morning it was pleaded, he desired her to send her maid to him, and gave her a letter, improperly reflecting upon her (Lady Caroline Neeld). The letter had been produced — it was as follows : De. DAM), for instance, on the 14th of this month, intimated, in the most direct terms, that he had seen no unequivocal case of the cholera at Sunderland. But mark : in a letter to the Guardians of Birmingham, dated only one day later—namely, on the 15th, he states that if " a similarity of symptoms during life, and of ap pearances after death, be sufficient to establish the identity of the two diseases, that which has recently appeared in Sunderland is unquestionably the Indian or spasmodic cholera." Take these two statements as specimen of the Doctor's consistency. In another part of the letter alluded to, Dr. Dann recites a fact, which, in our humble opinion, goes far to prove that the Sunderland disease is not the Asiatic cholera ; or, at least if it is, that it is so far mo dified as to scarcely deserve the name. He says, and the information is important, " The number of cases is sur prisingly few in a place where, from the filth, poverty, and density of the pauper population, in many parts of the town, it might have beet!...-4;si.:Led (co;ssideriug the rapi dity with -,t;.1. spread in & ecr y tow , . , •to , Cootinent of LG the soh ase Et as 'well as Asia, aLt.:r it had appeared in it) that there sl-anild nave been, by this time, as many hundreds of the inhabitants of Sunderland attacked as there have been individuals." So much for Dr. Daun's consistency. We have now a word or two to say to Dr. Daun's colleague, Dr. Gibson. We observed, in the beginning of this article, that the cholera may he considered as a regular God-send to the electors, That Dr. Gibson looks upon it in this light is evident from the following extract from a letter of his, published in the Courier. " Had the report," says the Doctor, " only included a column for malignant cholera. I am persuaded we should have hail blank returns sent in by many ; it was therefore necessary to spread a net large enough to catch all thefish." So, then, Dr. Gibson looks upon the cases of cholera as a fisherman looks upon fish— that is, as a sort of prizes. But mark the delicate slang employed—the jocular way in which the horrid sufferings of the unfortunate wretches is treated : the language puts us in mind of that employed by the body-snatchers ; like theirs, it is only calculated to excite disgust. Dr. Gibson may, for aught we know, be a very humane man, and he probably is ; but we can tell him that if, in writing upon medical subjects, he cannot find more appropriate terms, he ought to imitate the physicians of old—wear a large , wig, carry a cane mounted with gold, shake his head, and express himself only in monosyllables. Let him do this, and he may be considered a wise man : he will certainly not expose himself by his language. While upon the subject we may be allowed to remark that certain of our cantemporaries appear to us to have as sisted not a little in keeping up an unnecessary alarm in the country. In our humble opinion, it is the duty of the Press to endeavour to allay alarm, rather than to excite it. At the same time they ought, instead of praising the ; exertions of the Parish Board of Health, to excite them to do their duty—which we have good reason to know they ; do not do. With the exception of the City Board of Health, these bodies in the metropolis appear to us to be generally inefficient. A fact ha. come to our knowledge which, if well founded, proves, almost beyond a doubt, that the disease of Sunderland is not of foreign origin, but indigenous.— A book, we understand, was published by a Sunderland physician about thirty-five years ago, in which he de scribes a disease as common in that place, the symptoms of which correspond with those of the malady now preva lent there. We have further been informed that a gentle man resident near London, a natire of Sunderland, states that he recollects that, thirty years ago, it was invariably the practice of his family to leave that place about this time of the year, on account of the sickly state of the town.— Mor ing Herald. We are happy to hear that Lord PALMERs- TON, after having taken the opinion of the Law Officers of the Crown on the subject of the claims preferred by several British subjects for compensation for injuries and outrages inflicted by Don AlicuEn, has instructed our Consul-General at Lisbon to demand reparation, and to state that it will be insisted on. We understand that, in the event of refusal on the part of the Usurper, active means will be immediately resorted too to enforce the award of the Law Officers. The LORD CHANCELLOR will leave Ber keley-square this day, for the Regency Hotel at Brighton, where Lady BROlTilliAli and her daughters are at present sojourning. Since the return of his Lordship from the North he 11:-.5 made short visits to his family at Brighton every Saturday, returning on Monday to resume his duties in the Court of Chancery. TURKS IN THE FRENCH ARMY. - --About two hundred Turks in Oran, where the French expedi tion army is at present, have requested leave to enter the Christian service ; a difficulty, however, has arisen, as they insist on being allowed to wear the Eastern costume. A gentleman walking through the streets on a very cold day, who could not boast of his stature, passed a very tall man, upon which he observed, " I wonder what the temperature is up there." It is said that eight of the vestry of the Rev. EDWARD laviNG have left his church, and sent in their protest against the humbug of new tongues. This vestry c , nsisted of ten members, who are either elders or deacons. There are now only two members remaining. We learn from the German papers, that a weekly newspaper has been published in Constantinople, in the Turkish language. Officers of State are appointed to manage it; and it is to be translated into some of the European languages. " Coulson's Hotel, Thursday Night. " Counsel have advised me, upon deliberate considera tion, that nothing short of an act of adultery on your part, or acts of personal violence, or some other acts which they have intimated to me, would enable me legally to refuse your claim of cohabitation, they had all your acts of misconduct towards me laid before them, and they have advised me that, however unworthy your conduct might have been, you had net legally forfeited the claims of a wife. Under these circumstances, I consented to take you back. " In obedience, therefore, to the Doctors' Commons de cree, I have consented to take you back; but as I have not any habitable house in London, and as it is doubtful, under the circumstances in which your behaviour towards me has placed me, whether I shall ever hereafter keep auy ~. ' • :‘ ' .2, -- ------•-..;_. .." - NT J I: ... , . : ....),,,,„.-,-,,,..., -_,N, --- ,' ‘, 4...:.• . ~).. . , ( r - ~*; . , fife --'. ~..,- - -....t.,;(..i ....- ~ i 7-: - ' ' , .4 r iv,,,A . —// - • N,' ,. ~ 4 ., -../.,,... I . 1 : : :• ' - i' v_4.,. ~,„,„' ' r. s:l) '''':-.. , , ' ,. 1 ---- ", - ; . : : -: . : : -- „ s \ ' '.4 : , Z . ,. I **-. 1 ... . t( ... ' - ' - ' - ___._, ----- -,,,,,:,,,, L- '---.. At : ,- -:: : ,'i:: .• . 4 , ..5..\-•.:.,, ',1,. k N ., .k„it 4.,,, , • ..., 14 , f....- ' , ::.1:4 m ) I , ' ):4 ''..„' >- t. 1 , - — m4 -i '- 074 -IL :,•i=---= ' 04., •x : ,, A \,:-.,, , 0 07 .2, -i... , " ,-- - c ' .e , 7•3 v. - 0 ., ~.,,,. ..,,, ~. - , ailipi t m , ~/_, ~ - )it,.i, , , il _ : • ----.---A:..::.y._,, ..4.,.. , ,k. , ----<,l_,--A• - PRICE 7D. promised her the enjoyment of. The marriage turned out unfortunate—by whose fault it was not easy to ascertain. There might be fault on both sides ; Mr. Neeld, for some reason, might have con ducted himself with some degree of harshness to- wards his wife ; but, except the act of locking her up and the bruises, it is alleged she received, there was no personal violence on which a sentence of separation could be sustained. But the 37th article was a novel one ; after all the specific acts were charged, they were summed up in a general plea—that, as well in the above instances, as in every other in- stance, during their cohabitation, the said Joseph Neeld had used every means in his power to vex and harass his said wife; that he grossly abused her; that he frequently treated her with sullen si lence and " pretended' contempt ; that he abused her family, and said they were a set disgraceful to be connected with, and declared that he would bring her down " lower, lower, lower, still." He (the King's Advocate) was satisfied that he had said enough to show, that if every circumstance pleaded in the libel were proved or admitted to the fullest extent, there was no ground for the Court to hold that the prayer of Lady Caroline Neeld ought to be granted on the plea of:cruelty, ud that in respect both to form and substance t)-* libel ought to be rejected. Dr. PHILLIMORE followed on the same side. Dr. DopsoN began by justifying the reintrodue- tion of the facts which formed the ground of the suit for restitution, which, though condoned, if followed by other acts of cruelty, were revived thereby. Lady Caroline Neeld was therefore en titled to set forth all the acts of harshness and se- verity which had begun from the moment of her marriage. It was necessary that she should repel the presumption which might arise from the cessa tion of the suit, and to show the peculiar circum stances attending it. It was tot because this noble lady expected to be treated with kindness and tenderness by her husband, that she desired to be restored to his society, but for the pi eservation of her character, which was dearer to her than life, and which had been grossly and slanderously assailed. She had been charged with giving birth to a child six weeks after her marriage; that she had declared her husband was not the father of the child, but an officer in the Guards. And what was the conduct of Mr. Neeld, whose duty it was to put an end to the slander ? He openly and ostentatiously deserts his wife, obliging her to Lye in a manner in which the wife of a wealthy man ought not to live, thereby countenancing the calumny. The King's Advocate had treated the facts in the libel as ludicrous, yet lie deprecated their going forth to the world ; but the strong manner in which he depre cated this, was an argument against their being ludi crous, frivolous, and trifling. With respect to the law of cruelty, no strict definition had been given ; it had been said what cruelty was not, but no affir mative definition had been given. He admitted that to constitute legal scevitia, there must be reasonable apprehension of something affecting life, limb, or health, and he submitted that the facts stated in the libel came up to that definition. The Learned Ad vocate then went through the articles one by one, re plying to the objections made by the two Learned Counsel who preceded him. With respect to the separate beds, pleaded in the fourth article, it was said that it ought to be pleaded that the separation was by desire of Mr. Neeld. So it was. It was alleged that it was no fault of the wife's : whose {49. 1 ,t .Ylkk is Om:I.-But acsirrai JO JIM There was a fallacy in the whole argument on the other side. They assumed that because each fact in the libel was not an act of cruelty, it could not be put in plea. But they might be pleaded in aggravation of other acts. In respect to the Sth article, the King's Advocate had said that the secret was out—that the object of the lady was money, and nothing else. But he had not read the words, " as by so doing she should compromise her own character, which had been so severely attacked." Had she consented to such a proposal of such an allowance from a gentleman who was the rich le gatee of the late Mr. Rundell, there would have been an end to her fair fame, and she owed it to her friends, her family, and herself, not to accept thor e terms. Her character was dearer to her than all the worth of Mexico and Peru. But the object of Mr. Neeld was to get rid of his wife as cheaply as he could, as might be inferred from all the circum stances of the case. The Learned Counsel then contended that the circumstances attending the breaking up of the establishment in Grosvenor square, were insults and indignities offered to the wife, with a view of vexing and annoying her, in furtherance of his object to oblige her to accept an inferior allowance. Dr. LUSHINGTON inquired how he was to take as evidence the contents of letters not annexed to the libel; and declared he should find some difficulty in giving his opinion of the libel as it now stood. „ . Dr. DODSON and Dr. ADDAMS said, that as only isolated passages of the letters were referred to, they thought it unnecessary to exhibit them, but they should be annexed. Dr. DODSON continued.—He insisted that Mr, Neeld's conduct with respect to the carriages and horses, was for the purpose of annoying his wife. With respect to his behaviour when the paragraph in the Satirist appeared, what individual with the feelings of a man would suffer such a degrading in sult on his wife ? This was a cruelty indeed, for it inflicted a deeper wound than a mere bodily injury. Instead of refuting the charge and punishing the libeller, Mr. Neeld had acted as if he believed the charge was true ; and it was not till the application of Mr. William Ashley, that he condescended, on pain of a certain alternative, to take up the prosecution. It was said that it was a shocking thing to bring such a circumstance before the Court ; but if the con duct of one party was so atrocious, it was necessary to do it for the relief of the innocent party. Persons without courage themselves were addicted to cruelty, and especially cruelty to women; and when Mr. William Ashley applied to Mr. Neeld in a way to bring the matter home to himself, he consented to prosecute. The Learned Advocate here pointed out in the remaining articles, the proofs of Mr. Neeld's systematic annoyance of his wife, with a view, as alleged, of compelling her to a separation on his own pecuniary terms. It had been said that Mr. Neeld's ordering Lord Ashley to be turned out of the hotel was what he had a right to do. But if such right was exercised in an improper manner, it became marital tyranny. No offence or provocation whatever had been offered by Lord Ashley, yet he orders a waiter to turn him out of the house. The objection to incurring expense on account of Lady Caroline's extravagance in burning wax candles, al most induced a suspicion that insanity was mixed up with the case. If all these facts did not bring the case withing the legal definition of cruelty, he did not know what could. If there was only one act of cruelty, or no act at all, but a reasonable appre hension of violence, that was sufficient to found the sentence of the Court. Here they were coupled with a great variety of circumstances of aggrava tion, ane if the statements in the libel were borne ;nut by evidence, Lady Caroline Neeld was entitled to the sentence of the Court. Pr. LUSHINGTON directed, that before next court day the letters referred to should be exhibited. COMICAL ANNOUNCEMENT.—.III the Wor cester Paper of last week we find the following comical announcement A rascAl in our next." THE PEERAGE. (From the Spectagor.) " Honours the cheap defence of nation,." EDMUND BURK E. The following tables spew the offices that have accumulated in the hands of the various members of the Upper House and their relations. They are not framed to support a theory, but to exhibit a fact. The Peers fill, almost to the exclusion of the rest of the community, all those places which require of their occupants exertion of body or mind—sinecures, and places approaching to sinecure, under Government-- the Army plentifully—the Navy rather more sparingly—the Church universally. The grand interest of the Peers is to multiply appointments at home and abroad, and to pay them high ; to keep up a large military force ; to foster an ex pensive Church. By these things they live. Wherever attention and labour are requisite wherever influence is shut out—there Lords arc not found. 'the Courts fill the House, but there is little reciprocity of kindness : Law Lords make the most of law sinecures, but the Bar, among its sons, has few Honourable or Right Honourable. The Artillery, where seniority is the mule of promotion, has hardly any ; the Ma rines, where a similar rule obtains, not one Noble member. The Exchange knows nothing of the Peerage—not because Lords despise small gains, but because merchants' gains must be worked for. The good thins of the Constituticm • are mostly in the han d s of Tories', but the - Whigs are not wholly without their share. Their merit in supporting Reform is the greater, that they are called on to make substantial sacrifices for its sake. In the distribution of offices, tli' Irish seem to affect the Church ; the Scotch the Nally and Army ; the English take indifferently to any department of the State that promises good en tertainment. The Roman Catholic Peers are the only body that stand clear from all conta minating influences ; and, as a proof of the value of such political abstinence, they arc, with a soli tary exception, friendly to Reform. It cannot be too strongly borne in mind, that thin part of the anatomy must be received as an illustrative specimen only. The various family ramifications—the collateral branches, especially • on the female side—and the numerous con nexions by marriage—would require the work of years to develope, and would occupy a volume. This holds especially in regard to the in fluenceP, whether direct or indirect, whether pe cuniary or honorary. The only authorities with any pretensions to accuracy are the Parliamen tary, Returns. These, however, merely relate to offices held immediately from Government. They are sometimes (of necessity) incorrect and defective ; they arc, in a national point of view, shamefully incomplete. The vast patronage of the East India Company, the enormous re venues of the Church,. the innumerable snug geries in Corporations, the valuable appoint ments in the gift of the Magistrates (who are nominated by the Lords Lieutenant of Coun ties), and the very many jobs the Magistracy can create, or the lucrative businesses it can ap point to, are all unknown, or known only by conjecture or report. To this enumeration should be added the patronage connected with Colonial appointments, and the various jobs ia a small way which enable every Government official of any standing to provide for or to serve a friend or dependant. It may be said that these offices must be held encc of many, and the rate of remuneration in all, are open questions, as is the aptitude of those who fill them under the present system. Waiving this, however, the justice of an impartial distri bution is undeniable. Why should four hundred individuals, with their connexions and depen dants, enjoy a monopoly of the good things for which the twenty millions are called upon to pay? The following summary, drawn from our list, imperfect as it must be from omission, gives us an idea of the number of military, naval, and clerical appointments held by Peers or their con nexions. The individual instances will be found in the tables. It should be added, that the numbers must be received cum grano, as in • le e t C its Church, that the ap parent individuals may hold several appointments, n p l a a r l e ) ;it ca to se ta s ; isespeciallypossiblyin the much under the real , The reader will not fail to observe how the of numbers 4 67 o ffidei me ‘ rs, we 1 1 1 t the e vl only s nol 51 subalterns. u me nts Out 44 General Officers of various 29 Majors. ranks. 51 Captains. l 5 Colonels. '2B Lieutenants. 45 Lieutenant-Colonels. 11 Ensigns and Cornets. 32 Admirals of various rankNsA.:llls.; Lieutenants. 111 Captains. CHURCH, 3 Archbishops. 10 Bishops. I k 9 Connexions of Peers hold ing Church Prefennent. CONDEMNATION OF CIILOPIEKI.--Tile St. Petersburgli Papers state that his Imperial MaJrsry confirmed on the 14th (26th) September the sentence of the Court•martial, by which General CHLonEKI is con demned, as a traitor, to the loss of his rank and nobility, and to banishment to Siberia, and to be employed there in the public works. Cape of Good Hope and Mauritius Papers, the former to the I I th of September, and the latter to the 24th of July, hare been received to-day. The Cornwallis had arrived at Table Bay from Swan River, after leaving her cargo there. She did not bring any news from that settlement. The Mauritius Gazette of the 11th contains a notice of the death of Dr. LYALL, late British Resident at Madagascar. He fell a victim to the fever peculiar to that island. Dr. LYALL, already known to his country men by the account of his travels in Russia, was about to complete for the press a nail afire of his observations while resident at Tananarivo, when death put a atop to his earthly and literary career. We understand that the advances of the British Government, inviting the consideration of the ex tension of commercial relations with England, have been met in the most friendly spirit by the Ministers here. It must not be forgotten that the British Parliament took the first step towards a more liberal policy, by adopting a measure of which Mr. P. THOMSON (who is here for the purpose of effecting such changes as are compatible with the great interests of both countries) was the author— namely, the reducing the duties on French wines from 7s. 6d. to ss. 6d. a gallon. It is earnestly to be de sired that an alliance, founded on the basis of mutual pros perity, may grow out of these negotiations.--Paris Paper. SOURCES OF THE THAMES.—After a long ascent, you come to some solitary grassy hills; on the top of these, under the shade of two or three alders, is a little group of plashy spring., which trickle away, form ing, as far as the eye can follow them, an insignificant brook. Such is the infant modesty of the proud Thames; I felt a tide of poetry come over my mind, as I thought how but a few hours ago, and a few miles hmee, I had seen these same waters covered with a thousand vessels; but this glorious stream, in its short course, bears on its b oso m more 'hips, more treasures, and more human beings than any of its colossal brethren ; how the capital of the world lies on its banks, and, by her omnipotent commerce, may be almost said to rule the four qu trtets of the globe. With reverential admiration I looked down on the gushing drops, and compared them one while to NAPO LEON, who, obscurely born in Ajaccto, in a few years made all the thrones of the earth tremble ; then with the avalanche which, loosened from its bed tinder the foot of a sparrow, in five minutes buries a village ; then with RoTnscHlLn, whose father sold ribbons, and without Iwhose assistance no power in Europe seems now able t o carry oa war..—Tour of a German Prince.