The Sun. — London, England, 1856-05-21 00:00:00

14 01 4 r.) 0 1 4- WED N E 8 I" . A. Y it V 1 1 3 N I 1 4 7 `• Gi MAY 61 Iti . . T_ .... N eointvy )villtheu. . ~.., . .. T. her favour. H o did no t rest on hi s own op i n i on on this his noble and learned friend that the question was one , friends by mean s o f t h e i r pol i t i cal opponents. That cer- thee quettion. Their l aw o ffi cers, he o b served, profes• Sporting Intelligence. i i I i'd pAaI A I, PARLIAII 11 11 A . point. Lord Th ur l ow s t a t e d th a t th e i r l or d s hi ps passed for a select committee. , tainly was not the treat, pleasant position in which a sing a desire to cleanse what was called "an Augean -................... divorce bills in a variety of cases-that they were go- Lord REDESDALE said that the common law of Whig Minister could be placed. Then there were other stable," had endeavoured to earn a little popularity by BATH AND SOMERSET COUNTY RACES. LIVERPOOL-MAY 20. ate verned in their judgment by the circumstances of e ac h E ng l an d recoo t ised no divorce a vinculo, and that this . i . considerations which made it still more unpleasant to throwing bills upon the table, arid perrniting them to . be ! TCESDAY. HOUSE OF LORDS-(TESTERDAY). particular case-that he did not know how it could Le diveree was always effected by a special law. No de- ' them. He found from an analysis before him that, al- bustled rind jostled without any rati o na. hope f "- passi ng i The Lansdowne Stakes (fiarelicap) of 5 SOVS each, with There a „ . . ~ . .. 3. 1- .1 . 1 Ce./ . . Icrate demand for consumption, at about r rut ys e }lour otherwi se , beceu.:e with respect te divorce oases there mand had been made for a divorce a vincsdo by the though the majority of hon. members in that hou‘,e op- ~ them.. . With respect to the motion, he objected to the 40 added; certain winners extra. One mile. Seven- b se'unight. ea ,. The LORD CHANcEI,Lor, took his seat on the woolsack (- eine id per bushel decline from this day was no rule to limit discussion or to contract the limit people of this country, and he could not conceive, there- posed to the ballot was considerable, yet that the num- principle of the bill, and hoped he was not to infer that teen subs, also moved off steadily, good American and Spanish r . at five o'clock. NEW PEER, an d discretion of their lordships. It might be said that fore, the need of the bill. It had been laid down by the i ber of the electors by whom they were returned was ,he Government were prepared to adopt so left-handed Jr. Adkine's Curious, 3 yrs, 6:t Sib (Fordham) 1 hie; about 61 per barrel and sack. Indian corn a good :le, Wl9 R fair atterelence to-day. Wheat was ia. ll3 Q: . e cli as a Baron of the U n it e d Ki ng d om, a t ier. - The Eert of KEN :TARE teek the oa th s an d hi s sea t the case to which Lord Th ur l ow referred was a cue of highest authorities th a t th e h app i ness of the married 1 ridiculeuely s m a ll in compar i son with the rest. Added a manner ef initiating, ecclesiastic a l reforms. ale. T. H ug h es ' s R omeo, 6 yrs, Set 3 , 1) .. tD. Hu g b es ) 2 mend at about Friday'a prices. Otte, oatmeal, barley , incest, but Lord Thu r l ow s t ate d that he meant his ela state was promoted by th e i mmo bili ty of the marriage to this, that tl.e maj it:toy of the non-electer s in the coup Lord PALMERS TON thou g ht th a t w h a t h a d b een M. Bartiard's Si t o cco , 3 yr. 64 Sill (Swift) 3 peas supported lete rates. Egyptian beaus rath th er e vats. Lord MONTEAGLE p reseute d several petitions pray. eervatious to extend to Lord Audley's case, which was law, and. he agreed with that d oc t r i ne . H e o bj ected to I try were d e cid e dly i n i ts f avour, and centinuaile ex- said by the Selicitcr-General ac c ou n t e d f or th e failure off The following also ran :-V aii E yc k , N ew B r i ghton, Linseed and rape cakes in fair demand at fully lug for an impro vemen t in the p aroc hi a l school ,system not a divorce case. But if th ey passe d this bill, and the bill as because it did not go fare *neigh, and because pressed'thetnselves unwillin g t o accept any measure for the meatures referred to, it being the earnest wi s h o Moonshine, a n d H e l ene , lions. of Scotland. said that divorce could on l y b e grantee under particular its operation was to be haute Ito only a few cases. Once the extension of th e su ff rage w i thout the ballot. No ra- the Government, ha observed, to deal with this question, Betting-2 t o 1 ags t C ur i ous, 3 to 1 agst V an Eyck, -- IPSWICH-MAY 20. THIRD READINGS. circumstances, t'ueir lordships could not go int ) the principle of divorce a hincalo was adulated, it would tonal man could arrive at any other conclusion, thhn and tO push forward the measures as far as the other 7to 1 agst Romeo. Won by a length ; ten lengths be vheet, Our market is but moderately supplied with t f tell that if it were put to the countrygenerally, the mato- business would As to the motion, he was pre- On the motion of Lord REDESDALE the following other circumstances, and would have no discre- te u d i er i n i andet i h i o l : every o u cca ; ion, a d it b tz l i t o Continental . . _ . ._ . permit. . . ~ . tween the second and third. les of white e _ which meets a slow sale ; the tinest samp t aridity rity in its favour would,be enormous. They had in that pare] to vote for the introduction of the hill, restrving Tbe Biennial Stakes of 10 sovs each, with 50 added, for buy. B eaus tion. . Undoubtedly there . was an appeal to their co t es. . fonseq en e wou , bills were severally read a third time and patsed :- full rates, bet other sorts are rather easteraso before' lordships, but their lordships would be governed by of the marriage tie would become degraded, and a most house about 244 gentlemen who had recorded their to the Government the discretion of judging of the mea- 3-yr-clds ; colts, Set 10ib ; fides and geldings, Bst Weinman's Estate, East Somerset Railway, and Lou somewha sot e h a er. eas remain ao • the law of the court below In the report to which serious injury would be done to the Literals of the count votes in favour of this principle ; they had at their back sure when it was seen, without pledging hireself to any- 71b ; certain allowances ; the second to save his stake. • • don, Tilbury, and Southend Railway (Increase of Cape PER, QUARTER.I r 3 3A to 400 his noble and learned friend had referred, there was a try. The privilege of divorce was originally a job, as the flower of the electoral body, and they had the feeling thing farther. One mile and a half. 41 subs. tad). Wheat red (01d)... 62s to 68t 1 Barley, grinding ... clause to the effect that there was nothing to prevent the regarded the higher classes; aud now the bill Son .; Lt to of the people with them. To such a body, then, he would After some remarks by Mr, Its ....ALINS, Mr. E. Parr's St )rk, Bst 1011) (Wells) 1 42 314 et. Ditto (new) 42s ' THE MARITIME LAWS. woman, if the bill passed, from applying for a particul ar extend the result of that jobbery to all classes for the say nothing was impossible. How few years had elapsed Lord J. RUSSELL impressed upon the house the Mr. Waller's King C do, Set 7lb (Fiatman ; 2 Ditto, white 7os to 746 Peas , The Earl of ' ELLENBOROUG3-EI said his attention Act of Parliament to dissolve the marriage. They were sake of consistettcy, though its extension was not de- since the attempt which was made to abolieb the corn very great cfitlieulty of passing bills of this nature, Mr. Jt M. Stenley's Port.) Rico, Bst 101b...(Ashreall) 3 bad been called to the subject of our maritime laws, asked to pass a bill which would enable the husband to mantled. Great authorities had been quoted in favour laws was termed by the First Minister of the'Crown-a and the necessity of some alteration of the mode of , Furioso and colt by The Libel or Don Juan, out of Barley, malting ... 40s to 44 Flour, per sack . which had been referred to in the declaration made at d the wer e leavi ng of the bill; eut nothing had been said of the highest au- Whig Minister-madness, Flo tv long ago was itsince they transacting public business in the Legislature. He did Baliene, also ran. 7 "6. prosecute a divorce on easy terms, an . y . AVERAGES FOR THE WEEK ENDING MAY 1. • 1 • 8 a the rece tc f hld t Paris It appeared to him n on erence e a . the law mst as it was with all its hardship on the wife thority of aI. The Ut , noSt that could be got in the Bible followed into the lobby C. P. Villiere and a, select body of not object to the introdectie n of the bill, though it did Betting.-2 to 1 agst Porto Rico, 3to 1 each against Wheat that the language used on that occasion left the clues separeted from her husband, with probably no means, was separation for adultery; an d b e (L ee( ' R e d et d a i e ) gen tl emen , whom sensible Whigs and sagacious Tories not appear to him, he said, to afford a very complete Stork and Furies°. Won cleverly by three quarters of Oats - a 0 4 tittle in a very vague and unsatisfactory state. It was and, therefore, no possibility of redress. It had been said could never come to the conclusion that it sanctified regarded as a select body of lunatics, and even the cotin- remedy. a length. Peas . - -8 ea . highly desirable that the true meaning and intention of that adultery on the part of the woman was more to be divorce a vincula. He was, however, of opinion that try gentlemen as they counted them at the lobby-door Mr. WATSON and Mr. WIGRAM having made some , 230 „ 43s 2d • Toe Biennial Stakes of 10 sovs each, with 50 added, for Barley tho expression used should be clearly understood. With , becaus e it might be the means of introducing greater faciiiiiss than now existed should be given for looked as if they %%ere much afraid they would bite remarks upon the general subject of the reform of the t Beats - ...e s ea condemned, . t . . vvo-olds;-olds ; colts, Set 10Ib ; fillies and geldings, 84 PI a view of effecting that object, it was his intention to lay •• d - t which a ffo r ded ' them! (L uohter ) All that had passed away, and what ecclesiastical juris ' diction, and Mr. J. PHILLIMORE a .........._ spurious issue into the family. Theauthorayof Dr. John- obtaining a divorce a mensa e (hero, pri- 711); cerain allowances ; the second to save his stake. upon the table some resolutions upon the subject he in son had been referred to as a great moralist on thi s quest vilege and protection to the woman. Re thought the had they in its Place ? Why, like a dissolving view, there brief reply, leave was given te brine in the bill. T.Y.C., half a mile. 37 subs. HULL-MAY 20, t toaleir tended to propose. Re thought it desirable that the purport Con ' but unfortunately the comm y ission i r s h a d only cited bill ought to be rel e r re ,l t o a se l ect committee, appeared that celeb ra t e d race between two celebrated PUBLIC HEALTH BILL, Mr. E. Peres Latehourn, 8-it 10lb . (Wells) 1 Our f armers brought a sm a ll su p p ly o f w hes of these resolutions be clearly understood before his noble ti 11 tfth 2 -tr . e laid dOw •th s . The Earl of ABERDEEN said the only objection he statesmen, Sir R. Peel and L .rd J. Russell, to see who (A. Day) 2 which met a dull sele at 14 to 2s below last TuesdaY ' ttte , a . tirua par o e to in nio e Fonver. a eto introduce a • . Mr. COWPER, in moving for leav Dalt ot 13eautort's The Vigil, Btt 71b friend (Lord Colchester) brought forward his metion on felt •select . that • might lead 'should le first iat the death of the corn laws. Now he 0 a committee was lt in prac- en des • the report from Metk-lane disappoints the tlir st . rent . , tion alluded to. He would supply the omission, and bill to amend the Public Health Act, stated that the Lard J. Scott's Cantrip, Bst 71b (Flatinee) 3 •. • • the subject, which etood on the paper for Thurtday next. would tell their lordehips what Dr. Johneen had said i n tied to the longer contieuance of the present unreason- atked any hon. gentleman in that 'mu te we e th er he be- Foreign wheat unaltered in value, but rather slot e hie nea-ure was rendered necessary in order to correct the The tollowio also ran •-The Avenger Delos and DIVORCE AND MATRIMONIAL CAUSES BILL, order that they noight judge h ow f at t h ey wou ld su e abl e and unj us t system, a nd retard the remedy which lieved that that race would have been run if the people, I defects and ambiguiti e shf the said law. For want of fill bPI g h First, • f I - ' .' ley dull and lower. Oats and beans without chang • The LORD CHANCELLOR moved the second read- fer the Great moralist to be their guide and master should be appliee to it. He believed the Scotch law in hinted and spurred, had not mounted on their shoulders the necessary theo objects i ts of that law could not y e y yrr iu t e: l e L out o t 4 rne. 1 t Vigil, 10 seed firm -a good demand for cakes. Bones dull. , 0. '. ing of this bill, and shortly stated the marriage law as it on a subject of• this deseriPtion. Dr. Johnson said thaa titat retpect was f oun d e d on wisdoin and justice. Re and urged them on ? All he could say was that he hoped , powers ub With a view to the im rove- t B i ttin t g.-2 th on re atn d our N e, or t? agst V i in a canter by two 8 I Virheat, English, red 64 to 68Peas, grey and black h , th existed at a very remote pined "! ' down t o t h e present between a man and his wife the husband's infidelity did not deny that the case of a 3 oung duke b eing en - th e peop l e, ass i sted by some able groom-and there was te e p l tr of the r eanita y condition of towns' his bill as to lengths; o a au? , 0 t:r between til length e second and thi r d. Ditto white 7O t o 725 ; Linseed, Black Sea... I time, a 3 well as the practice of the Establisheil Church was nothing-th a t a wise woma n did not tro u bl e hers el f trapped was perfectlY possible ; but how many itinocent one in - Richard Cobden --would neo ua t th e should ers of. fi th ff t 1 lea sin of eventents and The Sotnersetshire Stakes of 25 sovs each, 15 ft, and 5 Dantzic and Konigs- Ditto Petersburgh ... and the Church of R .me in respect to divorce. The with the infidelity of her husband -that the differencs young women were entrapped by young dukes? He his noble friend on this occasion, and if they did, with the power removal tbo r f such eeec refuse an c nd filth a P ; might be ' acc law upon the subject wai in a very unsatisfactory state, between the adultery of the hutband and th a t of th e wif e thought that a Pro..dSe followed hy cohabitation ought all due respect to hi- noble fri en d, th a t th e y woo fd not i tdtf _ t ot l d a, empower u - only if declared, &c., with 100 added; the second to berg 7O to 72 Ditto Rigaand Arch- .....h t .. receive 50 sovs, and the third to ea te his stakes ; cer- Pomeranianandflamt 1 angel and it ought to be remedied. A commission sat a few was, that the adultery of the wife might impose a bastard to "° ll4l tute ffiarriage• As he (toe Earl of Ab e rd een ) f orge t th e 'ld age, "Spare the rod and you will spoil ia e .e rer. establish i w oi so d . the authorities o a sys t em . rains and tam n wieners extra. Two miles wed a distance. 7e - burgh 28 to 4.4 . years ago, at which the Lord Chief Justice was at the iseue on the husband -that the man, no clCiubt, was cri• believed wernen were infinitely more virtuous than men, the child." (Laughter ) Such was the scarcity of argn eewers, to be carried out at a certain dietance from the sub. 60 of whom pay 5 goys each Daniell, Holstein, and 1 Memel far 0 ,1 head, and it was on the recommendation of that corn- mina( in the sight of God, but that he did not do his wife he believed that for one young man entrapped by vici o us m ea t, an I so threadbare had the subject been worn, that houses also outfalle and reservoirs into which the refuse t• " Mill's •- • • Sir J. B. Cerva, 3, yis, 64 (Salter) 1 Friesland 57 to COI rnittee that the present bill was founded. In an . y material injary if he did nut limit her with open women there were 100 innocent young women entrapped there wits no puny whipster of an editor publishing an . Russian and Odessa 58 to 60iLins. c Hull 1 Os to 9/ 0 2 3 eh ~ ' e could . be ' harried. It would also provide for the se we e % b . Mr. Moseley's Alonz ~ aged, Btt 711) 21 to 271 Ditto fine for. 7/ 10s 8' 1 0 , $ , , Oat E 1' s, ng ish the present bill he proposed that instead Of adultery, and that she ought not greatly to resent his by designing young men, obscure paper in an Irieh bog, a Scotch moor, a Welsh eleg applied to the purposes of manure etk, . • r Mr. Star ey s Topsy, o yrs, 6st 51b (Enockt ‘-' Ditto Danish those various and costly proceedings which were conduct. ' That was the great moralist's doctrine. (Hear.) The LORD CHANCELLOR, under the circum- mountain, or an English plai n , who was not on this ques h e sew rt e tiatble The bill would also extend the The folio wing also . ran :- Poodle, Napoleon 111., Ditto Friesland necessary under the present law that a competent An observation on this passage by another moralitt de- stances, weuld no , . object to a aeleet committee. It was tio n perfectly able to master the subject. Ile would nove w e z r 0 P f raiei i • ne . one for the erection of üblic works • Mishap, and Intimidation. Ditto Russian 25 to 26 Rape cakes - s od to IN _ 4 • court should at once be constituted, which would have served attention. It was to the effect that the manner a mistake to suppose that the wife had n o remedy by the proceed to grapple with the various areuments which he . P d for the repayment Y of the same,which was to extend . le . ats to - Bettiog.-7 to 4 agst Cerva, 7to 2 agst Poodle, 4to Barley, making 3B to 10 1 Tares, English...-. tt _ to le full jurisdictiou to ince - tire into the matrimonial case-, in which the earlier pars of Joh"thm was Passed had bill: She would b eve E h e same remedy for obtaining a bad seen recorded. It was not his fault that people an over 50 yeara. The bill was not intended to apply te 1 a •st Aloazo 10 to 1 hest any other ••ffered) Wou by Ditto grinding 34 to 36 Ditto foreign brought before it, and if the charge of infidelity was given to his demeanour, and even to his moral character, divorce a media et thoro as now, and the husband, in- brought forward arguments which had been killed a corporate towns but only to those towns where there 4. ' • ' - ' " • - Beaus three lengths; bad third. Vato 14 Guano OO/ Os Si tol- - 0 0j I proved to grant a divorce. He proposed that seine peemliarities appalling to the civilised beings wile stead of coming to the House of Lords, wcuid have to &zee times over. No doubt they would be told that it h ' • was no representative government. The hon. gentle- The Selling Stakes of 5 sovs each, with 25 added, for Ditto foreign this oourt should supersede the necessity 1 °- were the companioes of his old age. Such was t h e go to the emu% • wee cowardly, that it was un-English to vote for mein man concluded b tnoving for leave to bring in the bill to 38 1 Flou • 1 3 58 ' Peas, white and yel. 35 , 1, per br . ...... • three-yr-olds an i upwards ; optional soiling allowances. actions for c r i nt . con ., w hi c h he always con- observation of Mr. Macaulay on the passage to which Lord LYNDITURST-Ho ( w unjust th a t i s . h ers of Parliament by way or ballot, and he saw a right • Hear ' hear) Y - siderecl of a very revolting nature. He did nut propose he had referred. It had been said that if the The LORD CHANCELLOR would, however, expect hon. gentleman on the opposite side who used to be • . Leave was then given tO bring in the bill. &c. ; once round, four suhe. wire won by Mr. 0 iver's DUBLIN, MAY 20. to abolish such actions if the parties desired to have re- right of bringing actions of divorce for adultery that his noble and learned friend would be pi epared t o very fond of that argument. (Sir J. Graham bowed to _. IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT BILL. hhrielbald, 4 er e 7.it lilt , Prior, beating Stextuo Tower, and Jeu d'Esprit. forll ier A small supply, little doing, and prices steady at course to them; but they shoul I not be a neceesary pre- were extended the courts would be choked with tate those cases to which 11 , 4 withed the reneery to he the hon. gentleman.) He would .ay it appeared to him lly t" euotatious, except for Indian corn, which was fu . luminary proceeding to the obtaining of a divorce. He them but he knew the characte r of the t applied to the committee, though he (toe Lord Cliancel- a mockery of cenimon sense, (L eie,feer.) It wet plain Mr. A. PELLATT obtained leave to bring a bill to Tile Members' Rate (1 - lattdicep) of 50/. ; winners extra. qr. lower. 3 9.0 t further proposed that the Lord Chancellor, the Lord of e th al is ; country too well to suppose thatanything but lute expeoted no great good from that committee, that the army and navy, the nobility and cornmonaay amend the law of imprisonment for debt, Once round, about a nale and a half. White wheat, 3s Od to 425; red ditto, 35u oa to 00 , Chief Justice of the Queen's Bench, and another ju.lge, extreme ases would inducethem to Tue bill was then read a second time and ordered t o of this couritry, voted entirety that way in their clubs ; DISSENTERS' MARRIAGES BILL. Mr. Smith's Freckle, 4 yrs, 5 a 121 h ..... .(Elnarrelen) 1 barley, 11e Od to 19s Od ; °ate, lls Od to 14s Ori ; 'noel should preside in the court, and that tioere should be an actions. (Hear.) It bad been sa,id by a recent wrifer, h f _re re.erreil to a select committee. and the logical consequeece was, that if' ,t w a 4 " W "dlY The house went into committeepro forma on this Mr. T. Peres Wantage, 4 yrs, 64 10Ib ..... (Carrel) 2 -s Od to --8 0,1 per brl; oatmeal, 1430 d to 15t 01 ; e t s o. l This to the House of Lords, as in all other cases. that a man, theugh neglectful of marriage vows, mielit SMOKE NUISANCE ABATEMENT. aud un-Euglish, the . , were a pack of c i wards. (Renewed bill, Mr. Mellish's Sand boy, 4 v re, 64t 515 (J. Land) 3 dour. rils Od to 213 Od per cwt ; futile acorn, 29s 01 ies" court is not to try cases at the instance of the be a kind husband and father ; but if they added to time The Srucke Nuisance Abatement (iletropoiis Act) laughter.) Let them answer for that. It was said The other orders of the day having been posed&t of The following also ran it-0 hi Rowley and Champagne. per 480 lb.. wife, and the law would, therefore, rem sin precisely in Amendment Bill was committed, and ordered to be re- that electors held the franchise in trust for the the house ad . - 1- ' Won by a leegth and a halt; bad third ; the other -- woman natural love for her husband and children, the j aimed at a quarter past eight o'clock, the same state as it was at, present. It had been sug ported non electors, and that the trust must be exercised openly. two beaten off. CORK-11eY 20. e eJt ° obvious interest she would have to remain in her home 1 gested that the bill should be extended to Ireland. To PROCEDURE BEFORE JUSTICES (SCOTLAND). But that argurneet hod been dealt with and dettroyed by -- - --- White wheat, 395; red, -s to --s Od ; barley, L s and to avoid exposure, they might be sure that few wo! ----- Heat a course he should not object, provided. it was the Tac Proce• u-e before Justices (Seut,and) Bill went Mr. Grote and Sir W Molesworth. Even admitting the PARLIAMENTARY DIVISION. 13ETTI'NG ON THE COURSE. -s Od; oats, 13s to 15s. Od. men would be disposed to avail themselves of the remedy opinion of a majority of the house, through c mumittee. • franchise to he a trust, what was the definition of it dis- —..,0,...------ ..... of the divorce. He was satisfied that the more their THE DERBY. - - - Lord LYNDETURST had thought it his duty to con- lordships r fleeted upon the matter the more they would BANKER,S COMPOSITION. I charge ?If the elector voted for the man dills choice HOUSE OF CONIMONS.-MAY 20. 11 to 4 agst Wentworth SRA BORN& ;VA ILS. .. sider with muc h attent i on the bill of his noble and find that married women, except in extreme ease, wood The Bank e r s ' Composition Bill also w en t th roug h uni n fl uence d by Rordid 'naive s sure l y he discharged his THE BALLOT. a 11 to 2 agst Fazz ii e tt o (t a k en ) ii eatnities mat teee mails ar e sent i Torn the General p 0 toø learned friend, but notwithstandin,g the respect he enter- not avail themsel, e, of this remedy. There ought to be couttuittee. trust. But open vie ng by no means shovved ehethe r Motion made and question put, " That leave be given to 12 to 1 agst Artillery (taker]) , the netnt-end Mby the tnorritne-efespa tamed for him he must eay that he thought the measure no distinction between the adultery of the husband arid The house then adjourned at a quarter before eight this were so or no t. Th e vote was open and the motive bring in a Bill to protect the Electors of Great Britain 14 to 1 agst Fly-by N ig h t wbr i l ought not in its p resen t s h ape to pass into a law. So that of the wife. He would read a passage from the o'clock. wan secret; and open voting, so far from promoting the end Ireland, by totting the Votes by way of Ballot :"- 15 to 1 agst Ceroner (taken freely) Day wren) sta , l t•• pl F rom was' du. The House divided; Aye 3 111, Noes 151. 0017.NTRIZa. In General Po it- For AN ' far from rendering the situation of the wife better, it commission on which so much reliance had been placer], -________________ due diecharge of tr•utt, led rather to its breach. Tee pre -16 to 1 eget Vandertnulin (offered) Office Londol.* I . 6S / • Diepatehe . would render it much worse than it was at present. to prove that all the great authorities were net against his HOUSE OF C OMMONS.--(YESTERDAY.) veiling rule of bribery was that the money should not be Aeair, H. AYES -111. Freestun, Colonel Moffat, G. 16 to 1 agst Prince (offered) ...a..........1 1 - ........................... ....... !................ ..''-- 21 ' Considering, therefore, the bill, the interesting na..111•0 of view of the question. In the report of the case ef the paid before the vote was given. Take away the krtow- Adair, R. Gibson, M. Muntz, G. 50 to 1 west Barbarina colt (taken) tinerlea(Dy I srit.pack i', Every Friday . s.• Liverpool • its subject, and the extentive application it would have, Duke of Norfolk, Bishop Cozens, in his judgment, slid The SPEAKER took the chair at 5 minutes to 4 o'clock. ledge of the vote and you upset the system of bribery, A lcock, T. Glyn, G. Murrough, J. P. 1000 to 15 agst Astrologus (taken freely) kmerico. t by United Ste he thought, notwithstanding the inquiries that had "the bond of marriage is a conjugal union made between NE 1V MEMBER, for the briber could have no confidence in the bribed. Athertaa, W. Goderich, Viscount Norreys, Sir D. 1000 to 10 agst Pretty Boy (taken) packet) .......... 1 , ••••• -- • Liverpool tenerica (by U. State, taken place, that the whole matter ought to be re- a man and his wife that each of them will live to- Mr. Huories, QC., took the oaths and his seat for Bribery, however, was the least part of the evil. Intimi. 'leilt J• Gower, F. North, F. 1000 to 5 agst The British Lion (offered) packet) ..........tt " .••• - south/wee , . Greene, John O'Brien, J. ferred to a select committee. He was confirmed in this gether according to God's holy ordinance, noth withstand- • Longford, in the room of Mr. R. M. Fox, deceased, dation was the monster evil, and open voting was its Baxter, W. ' Grenfell. Charles O'Connell, D. . -- anatralia (via South opinion from what he bad heard stated by a minister of ing poveriy, or infirmity, or such other things as may life and its support. He would now call the attention - 7 . ll,thell, 41r R. Hadfield. George Oliyera, B. DERBY AND OAKS.-YOUATT CVM. GRAY, after a close ampton) ..........bi, ••• ••• •.• • • SouthamPio' etto (via etargetliest "sl the Crown, a gentletnan of great learnine and cemmand- happen during their lives. But tbe promise does net ex- • BILLS READ A THIRD TIME. of the house to the state of the ballot in America. It had Biddulph, Col. R. M. Hall, Sir Benjamin Otway, A. seerch, has direcovered the right " Pea " for the Derby. eitto (teate ot Does; O W ing talents. A few months after tbe bill of 1854 was tend to tolerating adultery, which, according to God's Elgin and Lossiemouth Herbour Leprovement ; been said . hat it wat not used for secrecy, but merely for njt Zi a ., Mulkey, T. Ilastie, Alex. Pcchell, Fir G. Pell At, A. The most expe renced sporting men have been puzzled Hops) ..........- 1 •.• Oa° withdrawn, the learned individual to whom he referred ordina,nce, dissolves the marriage. By adultery the very Kuareaborougla and Green Ifernmerton Road; and convenience. This was 3 mistake. The ballot arose in Blake, kJ. Hastie, Ar , ha, Phillimore, J. G. by the tricks played on the Derby. Two of the most N et 'l3O o• me onth .1 z fr ,, i . c a a ri tZe a s . t C0a5t).... i.. .. 4, g, .2 . 4, il, s in o 0, ~, , 17 , 17T " .. b .•:: i Keareeberoagh and Pately Bridge R iad. stated, in a place pretty well known, his opinion on the e.senee of the contract is directly violated, but the cote that country, like the game laws, from necessity. As Bouverie, Hon. E. P. Headlam, T. Pilkington, J. talented "play - men '' on the turf have been employed to _ tiexandria ........ ~ 3 1 ,4 th & '2oth et a a..•lSoulhantptoaf subject, and his mincere' and earneet hope that when tract ceasing the bond or obligation depending upon it The following bills were consi,iered and ordered to be p mulation increased intimidation arose, and took its Brocklehurst, J. Heywood, J. Ricardo, O. work the or aclle., and have succeeded. Well, I have dis• Bahamas„a: 47th of the ram la -' !Southampitz i another bill was brought in, due care and attention (that he the nuptial tiee) ceases also. It i 3 aeainst all read a third time on a future day :-Colne Valley and stand beside the voting urns. In those states in which Itlrrnt=,!;: D. N o o r lt a d n , E i . ,7. Rice, E. Roebuck, .T. covered the mi tv e ; nothing but accident can prevent Inv rig t ir ••••••• •• ••ee , Daily . - • IDover ....•• 1 ) 4 7 1 6, would he paid to the woman and to the cruelty and reason that all matrimonial duties should he for ever Halstead Reit way ; Cerk Bridees, Waterworks, &c ; the ballot was enferced the evil had been suppressed. Butler, C. S. If nahes, W. Scobeil. Dept. v,,9th of the montaa-•lSatithamptoi. 4147 i 6 hardship to vslich she wet exposed. Supporta] by such taken away, yet the bond or obligation to those duties F feetwood, Preston, arid West Riding Junction Rail- Mr. Pierce, of Mtstachusetts, had written him a letter Byng, G. H. C. Hutt, W. Seymour, W. D. patrons wine' gee a heavy stake by taking the double. itura--::3,):sih ,soulinmi:tor NO :,,, k an opinion, he ventured to suggest that the whole matter should continue." But he had another authority of a way ; o . xford, Wor.fester, and Wolverhampton Railway (al antwer to inquiri of his) fully eetablishing this. _ Climbers, M. Ingliarn, R. Smith, J. B. event. , Terms, Zis. ;to Goodwood, 1/. ls. Subtcribers nepeur Good Hope ...1S I Various port taro' Cape of Good .N I Ingrain, H. Sorn-ryille. Sir W. are part i cu l arly requested to enclose a goo d supp l y o f ought to be referred to a select corrunittee. There were higher character to refer to-a work called the "Refor- Hope . (Extension of Tim e , & e ) ; Sto c kt on an d M i dd leseroug i (Ile hon. gentleman proceeded to read the letter.) He Chapi n , W. Johnstone, J. Stanley, W. directed envelopes. Add ress, 15 , C har i ng cross. Cape do Verda ......N, 9th of the m c ot lg out h ame tov many quettions of great importance connected with the !natio Legum Eccle-iasticarum." which had been much Ne . w Road and Bridge ; Yarmouth arid Pladdiscoe bad another letter te the same effect, from the ex•secre. coffin, w. Keating, If. si rickland, 'sir G. Ceylon (see India) I 4 1 bill, arid with the reiatione of husband and wife. Tee relied upen bythe cornmissionin the reign ot E ward IV , Rel way; Beurnernouth Improvement and Pi er ; S hrews. tary of tate f. r Massachussetts. Inc ensequence of th ose , iallie i r, R. P. Kershaw, J. Strutt, Hon. E. • !. 'ln "fl.---7_7mr.r.,2 Cey10n.............. ,: Mon ~ Wed., , Channel Isles .... .....N &I/ rit .18cethampton TO China .. • bury and Hereferd Rallova,y. Y_. F. Ki ng , L. Sullivan, Mich ae l matters of whi c h th e f ema l e had a right to compl a i n composed•.fhigh ecclesiasticsand rnernbersof both hoes ee . , things toll law ha 1 enforce 1 the ballet in that state. e; j . u ° r s r g ie e , ltaikes Kinnaird, A. Tancrcd, H. From the London Gazette of Last Night. „, i 2.1 &17h of nu, nt ,ifaeuthamPl°- 3fay,2 were-fir -t, as respected property ; secondly, as re- th e object of which commission being the reformation of TEIE BANDS IN THE PAR KS. ig - Tuis was a pi c t ure i f true E• li •h intimidatio n . The • t Davie, Sir H. R. F. Langston, .1. H. Thornely, T. l . speeted perso na l protection ; thirdly, as r es p ec t e d actions the eccl es i as ti ca l l aws. It was the principle of the eccle- Mr. C ROSS LE IT, presented a petitio u from a p'ace tyranny of the laudocracy in this c iuntry was rivalled in De Verc 't E * Langton, ri. G. Tite, W. .........._„„.„„____.. Constantinople ....,...1,13,18,18,23,t28 0 f . , !Dover .... - 4th& 20th of na 7 .. Southampto , _ As ilf Of (Tim con. -; and fourtlity, a,s regarded actions for di- eiastical law, as laid down in articles by the COLCIMIA. neer Halifax, Yorkshire, praying that the military bandit America by the tyranny of the mercantile classes. The a - lett w D D i u l l i t w eli n i • Viscount Lee.w' • Villiers, C. Vivian, 12. 11 LORD CHAIIfi 3 ERLAIN'S OFFICE, APRIL 29. t font. of E oenstantinopte I urope M sir N Twice daily .. - - - Dover ...• • • Tillc" - . Voree. it would not require many observations to ex- sionere-that the adultery of the huebantl should be put 'night play in the parks ef tne metropolie on Suodays. Ameticans, however, had done their best to remedy the Duncan, George tu 'Cann, .T. Walmsley, Sir J. Notice is hereby given that her Majesty will bold a EgYPt (sea India) ~! & , Twice daily.,,,' . . * I D over,,.. Ticle adAlV plain those four points. With respect to property, he upon the same footing as the adultery of the wife, arid PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTA.TION. evil, and had put their shoulders to the wheel to get out Esmonile, J. Macalahoo, P. Warner, E. Drawing-Room att. James's Palace on Thursday the . I.anc i e t . "• t• •• M - it, 4 ,7.17.20 t , 2 . 7 : I "li , '.lSouitianpto ., Was not attempting to interfere with property between that adultery in either case ditsolved the marriage. Sir J. WAL MS LE IT postponed the motion of which of the moral mire. This country preferred to "stick , -• 7• .,`, F : r rt t ' 7 - 31a,gan, W. Watson, W. Wickham, IT. 29th May next, at tw o o'clock, to celebrate her Mejesty's Greece (s r ee • lnt • li;) • •• • I man and wife when living together in harmonious cote Ought there to be then such a dissimilarity betwee n the he had given notice for to-night relative to Parlia- in the mud" and wallow in c irruption. Instead e': .cergus'on, Colonel . ..t r : l a r n t tr i l n e . s, J. R. D. Wilkinson, w, Birth-day. dreytown ..........entnd &17th of Tr or ISouthampton nection, but when separated in censequence of the nits- law in one part of the country and in the other. In the rnentary repretentetion and the extension of the fran- of any effective measure there had been that most Ferguson, J. Martin, I'. Wilcox, B. •'N. B. The Knights td• the several orders are to appear in Hamhurgh ..........NiTuesdaY & Fri tat' Loudon ... .. . conduct of the husband by a eentenc e of the ecclesiasti- recent committee witnesses were examined with respect chise till this day month. ridieulous bill, the Corrupt Practices Prevention Bill, Fitzgerald, J. Massey, W. TELLERS. their Collars at the .Errawing-Room on th e eeth o f m ay ri a y anba h „ „ ~ ..,, It Onel of the mo )ti tioutnarsetes June i Holland ............WD 411 7.• •• •• • • • •• • Dover .••••••IDel o a cal court. At present the law was that the womall's to Coe marriage law of Scotland. Was there more licen• OFFICERS' HORSES -CRIMEA which had done all it was intended to do-viz., nothing. tF,oci.rs,tk..C.Th.arles Mail, B. T. Berkeley, Hon. H. F. next. Evans, Sir De Lacy FORE TC tN-OFFICE, MAY 13. Honduras ..........Ml l7l ' ' Lndi a (vlaSouthampt. (the mot th. Soutliamptor I 6 t is!! o 0 )m ,4th a 20th of m on. pfymouth •• )4 X 3 property belonged to the husband. If a legacy were left. tiousness in Scotland where equality in diverce existed Sir J. PAKINGTON asked Under Secretary• The hon. memeer read a speech of Mr. Tae, at Bath, in NOES-151. 25th of me itli Dover ...... the fo:- The Queen has b. wen pleased to approve of Mr. Manley India (via Marseillesiti o9th& to e woman so separated from her husband, or if she sue- than in England where the righl was corifined to the hus- W 1 ' • • which he said that he knew of several cases in which Agnew, Sir A. Gladstone, Capt. J. Newilegate, C. 'an Is'es see India • • ) 17 17 &270 f a orillaover...• ••,-1 4/ G a v r w letner it was the intention of her Majesty s Hopkins as Consulo 3-ttneral in the United Kingdom for f u irOl'and .. ( m& to 'Twice dailY ••.• • • E iol3 head . 11'1%10- ceeded to personal property, it belonged to her husband. hand. There was a greater power in Scotland to dis suoport• rs cf hit hal the "screw put on th en ." where. Annesley, Earl of Gooeh, Sir E. • Newport, ViscOunt the King of the Haw . sdian Islands. •• .• .• _ 16 The husband could seize it, and he generally did seize. it. solve marriagee, and why give greater facilities in one c r e im e e r a nin t e o ut ca on t I I:: r e e t a u t r ti t of the British army trete the upon Mr. Whately, the Tory candidate, said he had Aabn e ttin \ z r tt, Gen. H. Graham, Sir J. Nisbet, R. Li5b0n........., „ „miT• 9, 17, & 27 o'ir„F•outhamptorjalsl- , Grey, Rt. Hon. - Sir G. Oakes, J. ST. JAM HS'S PALACE, MAY 14. maura ............ mi 3th or the mc atl'l Southampton He hal known cases in which the wife had never enjoyed part of the kingdom than the other? The then Lord Ail. ) number of char gers belonging P tt, officers reghlettiin kn..wn of several of his eupperters who had been treated ne a fifie; H. Grosyenor, Earl Ossulston, Lord The Queen has bee, i pleased, on the nomination of the tie:tetra .... .. .. ..... N ,231 of month .• • . i'alverpool ... property so left to her. I; wa s a gross iuequality, coo- vocate and the Lord Juetice of Scotland proved that the horses are not brought hi whether t,h;e or, if Ao in tiee same way at B .stun. There existed a regular Baines, Rt. Hon. M. Gurney, J. H. Palmer, Roundell Right Hon, Lord E )ley, to appoint Charles Alexander watts (see India) I f 43 0 no vo , y intend te Palmerston, VLscount sequent upon the present law of divorce, and ought to wife had equal power in respect to divorce with the but- - make up to all officers the amount of allowance to whichbribery, band of men who were organised for the purpose of i. righ t s e i n r e . ; ;ls °te t e., Howe' Milford, Sir Henry Patten, col. Lockhart Rebertson, E Isq , one of her Majesty's Hon. Corps There • ere was the little town of Wells also. (Hear, eerte ,h, a t, " of Gentleman-at -Arms, vice Grange, retiree!. Mauritius (sae India) IT of the mot, tr 1 he Re. t. r;ght. Again, if a wife succeed e d te re a l property band. The witnesses were of opinion that no evil would thoy would have been entitled if their borses ha,d beau Hall, General John Peel, Gen. Mauritius ........ .N by deviee or inheritance, the husbane, notwithstanding follow from giving wives power of divorcing huebands on lost in her Majesty's servic e ?" . and laughter.) That tewn had been the Gcene of a strik- Beckett, W. Hamilton, Lord Claud Percy, J. COMMISSIONS SIM , TED BY LORDS-LIEUTENANT. ataxic° ............ea 2 ne td • the ht"to t• shortehateeten ga y 1; log cop est. "When Wieg met Whig then came the Bennet, Capt. P. Hamilton, .1. A. Phubinore, R.J. Royal Wiltshire Ye anaanry Ca alry.-Major Thomas Naples . i, ilthl s th 2 sthofm..m.)Do ver ....,, the separation, occupied it durin g life. Much worse account of adultery. The eviden ce o f th e Scotch law, “a Mr. F. FEEL said that no despatches ha I been re- Hamilton. J. Portal, M. v , _ „. & r ly v t , h t of motli• Sot .tb amptoi tee o _wer. (Laitghter.) The hon. member reait ex- " Rawdon Ward to be Li, ettenant-Colonel, vice Phipps, re- I s'ew qr"natls •• •• • • 3 ' l th an that, if the wife trie.d to eke out a scanty sub- different to our own, showed that no evil could be antiei- ceived iron) General Codringto n explaini ng why h e Bernard, Vlst. illindeoek, FL Pritchard, J. tlew Zealand ...• ......1 5 It Vaei p o , tracts from iwo dells , pa . pers, detailing the proceediegs Bignold, Sir S. signed ;• Supernumerary Major tho Eerl of Shelburne to Tsth I n e t i tl e t t t e n s e ffr' 01..1 °US - 11 'n—rtjtji sistence for herself and children by instruction, the pat e( ' f rom all ow i ng w i ves th e p ewee o f divorci on the issued the eyebolt referred to. A telegraphic cotnrnuni- Ilarc,urt, Col. Pugh. D oal !itates huraband. could .-eiza her gains and give them to his ground of adultery of their husbands. Lord Eldon, in cation had been forwarded to the Crimea, teatime i hat of each p trey at the elettien referred to. Great complaints Blackburn, P. !Jardine, lion. C. Repto a, G. be Major, vice Ware, pr emoted ; Lieutenant Thos. Fraser t gtt e , tipe • -d " ' '?:;l?thlttlitithoetion „l eouthamet t 11 th e aress . surely som e provision ought to he Moffatt's case, expressed himself on the Point in decided officers' cuarters were to be broush t w en ' free r,• • had ben male of the, proceedings at the Roceester elec. i . I ; t r iii i i , i l r , t l r e or , ce lt Mareu j is of Hardy, G . . Robertson, P. Grove to be Captain, v ice Wyndham. resigned; Cornet ta e l - e - :.'-.-,,;•,...,;•,.. -h . it l et eg. etth Of rno'..isouthami,tor et o cast, Ituts,•ll, Lord J. made, in legisleting on the law of divorce, to si t terms. The application for divorce was by Mar. Moffat aml also those horses belongin '' fi . t on, the hon. member elected for that place declaring 1 Bt, o3'o-1. tore, J. i ii ia t t v w te s r , , s l i v r . E. Edward Peach War. Mil es to be Lieutenant, vice Grove, Poet Natai .... ~.. 1 . t . ' .t 't.t private ship... i Various port , t t n eerli . gto of cers of the Turkish Russell. F. C. promoted. thittheetho•rno i , • such a qiiestien right. With the exception of aon the ground of cruelty and adultery. Leal Eldon ai- Coritiosent. that what he had teen practised there had decided him nerrell, Sir C. Beard. J. Rust, James , a,can __ „ , , eitaiesthorm or .; Dover .... seanty allowance io the shape of alim on y, the per- mated the doctrine of the right of tee wife to sue for SARDINIA. to vete for the ballot. The coostituenc . y of Le iminster I eurrowes, Robert Iteathcoate, Sir W. Scott, F. Northunaberland It de: stry Militia-George Dodd, Gent., '- Y •••• "• •• '23 vonezueli** ... • • . ........ m I t .7th (dwelt': etouthampr o e i & IGO Shirley, H. to be Lieut enan t . sonal preperty of the wife 'oelonged to the husband, divorce, and supported the secend reading of the bill on • hal also p e titi one d i n f avour of secret voting. But there, t. ," ' lv b e b r e i l d l ish " I. nl ti r e l e le . Y d' j i. van Dieme n ' s Li. n d Cie , 1 Smith, R. Royal Carmartht le Regiment o f Militia-Lieutenant . 4.ustral la ).. - r ' and be might assig u or bequeath it, and leave he r ari d th e su bj ect. Hie noble and learaed friend had alto ed Viscount GOD ERICH aske,d the Pint Lord of the hal also been an elec , too for Me/burst-a Waste which ca3ley, E: S: . Horafall, T. Smith, W. Devid Ed want .Tone ito be Captain, vice Lewes, resigned ; we , ' rorii.• ~ ' - ~ cl,•saa 17th r o m an ,.. e ieenthiuneter.l her children destitute. Tnere was no reciprocity or bis opinion reepecting the practice of that house, and he Treatury whether he would lay on toe table of the was a mere appurtenance to the Cowdery family. H e nhelsea, Viscount Bothell', Lord Sirnillett, A. Ensign John Thirla 'all to be Lieutenant, vice Thomas, -....... d e equality i n suc h a case. It hatl been sai I that marriage would refer to h is no bl e and learned friend, who wou'd house copies of two notes, dated the. 27th of March admitted that the pattern had recently exerci , eil g iod Christy, S amue l Howard, C. Contagion, bir C. W. Jolliffe, Sir W. Stafford, A. Stlrling, 'V. resigned ; E ns i gn G ewis Evens to be Lieutenant, vice vtlionany or these •taice tall ort a Sunday, the naafis wal !, a il , 6 settlenaent 3 Would prevent such things being done, but explain bit own vievv and reaton of change on the subject. nd the 16th o f A pr il last, presente I by the. Sari iniat i taste i n the nominati on of !nowhere for thi s b oroug h , Colea, H Jolli-lin es ,, It, Stracey, Sir H. -Tees, promoted; Ca arlae Lleyd, Gent., lob e E ns i gn, v i ce s iatche. on th e f o l lowiny day, with the exception of the) m ; 0 ffe eon), and the waits, both of which will be despite they well knew that settlements were confined to per With respect to the parties who had signe I tae commis- Piempotentieries, at the Conferences at Paris, to the f ir th e e patron bad replaced a most popular member Ceiviie, C. R. Jones, Admiral Stewart, Sir M. Thirlwall. promoted! ; Jotan Swan, Gent., to be Eusign, o . :tha i m m t day, Enelreh anti French Minieters. Conolly, T. Kell - , Sir 1' Stuart, Captain vice Evans, promote id. a John Hughes, Esq., to be Surgeon, P sons in a certain rank of life, and that nine-tenths of the -don there was one person who had on a previous occa (Mr. Walpole) by another lion. arid teamed gentleman Lord PALM . E RSTON said there was no objectio 0 cj iao w t p e :.r sir v c. H. King, J, Sutton J. vice Lawrence, reth •ed - e-tet____..........•-• marriages took place without any settlement. Another sion expressed himself strongly on to subject. He hoped wel known to literary ea no (Mr. Warren.). (Hear.) He Labouchere,Ttt.Hon.H Thesiger, Sir. F. BANKI tU -PTCY ANNULLED. LOCAL SHARE MARKETS. point was, that a woman separated from her husband by he bad now ehown that the weight of authority. was net to do so. The second note had not yet been answered (Mr. Berkeley) ' , Yes net at war with • ither of those hen. Davies, D. Langton. W. to. Tyr€ll, Sir j. A.s soon at it ware it should also be laid Liu the table a wl learned geutlein en , May 15. John Dm he I, Shrewsbury, printer and book sentence of th e ecc l es i att i cal court, in consequence if iu favou r o f t h e bill , b ut against it, and he hoped, there- of the h ouse . hut with the system of open D avies' j ' TA'n O.X. Lord A. F. Vance, John seller. bis misconduct, his adultery, or cruelty, wa s aleno s t it, fore, their lordships would refer the bill to a select C , bill , voting which th e y up h eld. The present hon. arid learned Da s e r d a e e s ti, W p illiate i L es i e , C. P. V ane , Lord FL LIVERPOOL, MAY 20. CELESTINA SOMERS. Lewis, Sir Q.C. V erner , si r W. Kt NK RUPTS. e tlf the conditio n o f an ou tl aw. Sh e could enter into no mittee, and he would cenclude by making his motion in member, when addressing the electors, had hail the Ora:, J. Liddell, 11. G. Walcott, Admiral. Henry Stuart and E tiata ard Kennett, tailors, Burlington- STOCK EXORaNur.-The market opened very buo 9 1 `tall contract, not ev en into a lease f or her residence. She the terms he had a l rea d y g i ven. Mr. WARREN asked the Secretary for the Home hardihood to tell them that their votes were unfettered, Duncombe, Hon. A. Lindsay, CO. J. Walsh, Sir J. gardens to surrendeto day, and a l arge basiness was transacted at her havin g a c i v il reme d y. That wee not a state ol ythi 0 I r oll was liable to i n j ur y b y v i o l ence and intuit in -ev er9 Lord BROUGHAM seconded the motion. An ng Depart men t w h et h er the advisers of the Cr own , i n r e . adiE Dungarvan. Vi ng that, being th e i r representative, lie fat " a proud Dundas, G Lowther. C a pt. Walter, J. scount Lushington, .i. M. IV wren, S. , l 'Juno 3, at t wo , and J u l y 1 , a t twelve, at th e C ourt o r a lark!' op tey. Lee, official a s si g - Prices, a n d in many cases a m ar k e d advance on yests way, and her character mi g ht b e t ra d uce d withoet commending a cemmutation of the sentence of death tuan, and their br ither." (A 1 1 . uotations. I Aug..) Why, to hear Dunne,Colonel Macartney, G. Welby, Sir CI. nee, Altlermanbury ;I, ',ichards, Warwick -street, Regent- q Lonr on and North - Western, 102 i i t h: t eh more convincin g , l um i nous, or more worthy of his reale I. • i ' lately pa sse d 0 i Caleatina Soinere at the Central Critni- ouch words aey one w ou ld th in k the bon. and lear ne d Eg er t on , Si r P . Mackimoii, W. Whitbread, S. s t ree t. -L.en e tsliire and Yorkshire, 91 9 01-Ditto, 16. Ft , ' thinge to be continued. When a husband brought an and learned friend he had never before heard or could nal Court for the murder of her child, hal ootained the member had been reedit) , " his own '‘Teri Th .usand a Egerton, W. Matins, Richard Iv hitmore. H. Cliarlet Erswell, buil, lore Saffron 'Walden, ES3OX, June i d.-North Eastern, Berwick, 201-Ditto. Leeds es O l t action against a tupposed - paramour he asked for have imagined. The bill in questien arose from a report report and taken the opini o n of the judge by whom she Year," and bad treated the c • onstituency to a ctapter or • mutton ~ arl of Emlyn, Viscount Miners, Lord G. Wilson, J. Masternito,.i. Wrightion, W. 3at halftpast two, and I duly 1, at on ~ at the Court of stock, 16 . 8 .9.-Sonth Eastern, 213 8 1-Midlands, damages as a solatiurn for his injured honour. It was from a respectable conunissiou ; but as he differed from had been tried ; and, if so, whetner there wa s a n y " Oly Ga om•.n." getuttiiter ) Ele( Ur. 8,0-keley) hail no Farnha'ut, E. M I tinsel', Col.T. Wyndham, Gen. Bankruptcy. Lee, of fie ial assignee, Aldermanbury ; -Sheffields, 2 9 —East Lancashire, 19j. altogether an affsir of money. But to the wife it was some of the conclusions of the report he was of Opinionobjection to laying them before the house ?'' desire to exclude the aristocracy from the House et - Corn- Ferguson, sir J. Miles, W. Wyndham, tv. hlerby, Whitehall-place ; Collin, Saffron Walden. --------. Filmer, Sir E. Michell, William Wynns, W. Robert Johnson, furni turd beoker, York. June 3 end 24 1111 affair of life and death. She lied no refuge. Nobody Sir G. GREY said the Secretary of State was exclu- mow. WLetter there were the ballot or not, hr should MANCHESTER, MAY 20. tho question ouoht to b d • • e ealt with in a lareer sense Forester Col. Monck, Vis. Wynne, John at eleven, at the Leeds - .J District Court. Hope, official as- e , ,„, 0 would countenance her ; and no society would admit e and sively auswerable for recommending a conunutatien tf 1 , a way,' like to see such ow e , a i Villiere Stanley, Walpols, GalwaY, • Viscouut Moncreiff, J. Yorke, i.l. oTOCE EXCHANGE.-This market has been doll/se a l• er basis There was onl signee, Leeds; Walker, York; Boud and Barwick, Leeds. t • . her. Was that a state of things which ought to be al- on a wid . y on e of tw o w a y s op en th e sentenc e in this insto.nce. He did not feel himself Duncan, and others Le could name, in the li use ; hut he Gaskell, J. IMowbray, J. It. TELLERS. air business to-•lay, but prices closed weaker tor t - ' Charles Bradshaw, lice seed victualler, Menchester, June I lowed to continue? In any action of that sort, although to deal with the question-either to deal with it in a justified an laying the opinion of the learned judge wh o Would take away the power of nomination from a Darb Gilpin, col. li. muigra , e, Earl of Peacocke. G. nws : - Manchoata.• oaereete __ , - . _ , tee ta • 3h Oisdstone, W. Naas, Lord Vyse, Col. R. 2 and 21, at twelve. at elm District Court Meneheore. she had everything at stake, she was not all Owed to ap- larger sense, or' to adopt the views of his noble friend tried the case on the table of the hott•e. It was a con- a Claretadon, at, Eemont, or a C onp.irdo an. He ap ... pear. That alto was a subject which deserved to be con- opposite, to give no i ernedy by divorce at all. The lidential communication to the Home Secretary, and he peated f or Stint' Ori: tn th. A .-1....,-,_, . • .-..- sidered. They all knew that a bill pissed through thai practice of refusing remedy to one party as a ma , tn. ..c alone was rpe.‘,..,,,;ia- Louse on this suhiect 411 ere"- ~,te Le e te lA . ea T . T m ! her favour. H o did nu t rest on hi s own op i n i on on this RIAL PAIILIAag.L.O AT. point. Lord Thurlow stated that their lordships passed divorce bills in a variety of cases—that they were go . verned in their judgm en t by th e c i rcumstances of each particular case—that he did not know hove it could be otherwise, beceu.e with respect to divorce oases there was no rule to limit discussion or to contract the limit and discretion of their lordshipe. It might be said that the case to which Lord Thurlow referred was a case of incest, but Lord Thurlow stated that he meant his oh eervatious to extend to Lord Audley's caee, which was not a divorce case. But if they passed this bill, and said that divorce could only be granted under particular circumstances, their lordships could not go int ) other circumstances, and would have no discre tion. Undoubtedly there was an appeal to their lordships, but their lordships would be governed by the law of the court below. In the report to which his noble and learned friend had referred, there was a clause to the effect that there was nothing to prevent the I woman, if the bill passed, from applying for a particular Act of Parliament to dissolve the marriage. They were asked to pass a bill which would enable the husband to prosecute a divorce on easy terms, and they were leaving the law just as it was with all its hardships on the wife separated from her husband, with probably no means, and, therefore, no possibility of redress. It had been said that adultery on the part of the woman was more to be condemned, because it might be the means ofintroducing spurious issue into the family. Theauthority of Dr. John son had been referred to as a great moralist en this ques tion, but unfortunately the commissioners had only cited a small part of the doctrine laid down in the conversa tion alluded to. He would supply the omission, and would tell their lordehips what Dr. Johnson had said in order that they might judge how far they would gol fer the great moralist to be their guide and master on a subject of. this description. Dr. Johnson said that between a man and his wife the husband's infidelity was nothing—that a wise woman did not trouble herself with the infidelity of her husband —that the difference between the adultery of the husband and that of the wife was, that the adultery of the wife might impose a bastard issue on the husband —that the man, no doubt, was cri• mina( in the sight of G. , 0(.1, but that he did not do his wife any material injary if he did nut insult her with open adultery, and that she ought not greatly to resent his conduct. That was the great moralist's doctrine. (Hear.) An observation on this passage by another moralist de served attention. It was to the effect that the manner in which the earlier pars of Johnson was passed had given to his demeanour, and even to his moral character, some peculiarities appalling to the civilised beings who were the companions of his old age. Such was the observation of Mr. Macaulay on the passage to which he had referred. It had been said that if the right of bringing actions of divorce for adultery were extended, the courts would be choked with them ; but he knew the character of the women of this country too well to suppose that anything but extreme cases would induce them to resort to such actions. (Hear.) It bad been said by a recent wri!er g that a man, though neglectful of marriage vows, might be a kind husband and father ; but if they added to the woman natural love for her husband and children, the obvious interest she would have to remain in her home, and to avoid exposure, they might be sure that few wo men would be disposed to avail themselves of the remedy of the divorce. He was satisfied that the more their lordships r fleeted upon the matter the more they would find that married women, except in extreme case, wou'd not avail themselte, of this remedy. There ought to be no distinction between the adultery of the husband arid that of the wife. He would read a passage from the commission on which so much reliance had been placed, to prove that all the great authorities were net against his view of the question. In the report of the case ref the Duke of Norfolk, Bishop Cozsns, in his judgment, said " the bond of marriage is a conjugal union made between a man and his wife that each of them will live to gether according to God's holy ordinance, noth withstand mg poverty, or infirmity, or such other things as may happen during their lives. But the promise does not ex tend to tolerating adultery, which, according to God's ordinance, dissolves the marriage. By adultery the very essence of the contract is directly violated, but the con tract ceasing the bond or obligation depending upon it (that is, the nuptial ties) ceases also. It is against all reason that all matrimonial duties should he for ever taken away, yet the bond or obligation to those duties should continue." But he had another authority of a higher character to refer to—a work called the " Refer 'natio Legum Eccle-iasticarum," which hail been much relied upon by the cornmissionin the reign ot E ward IV., composed ~f high ecclesiastics and members of both hotisz.s, the object of which commission being the reformation of the ecclesiastical laws. It was the principle of the eccle siastical law, as laid down in articles by the commis. sioners—that the adultery of the husband should be put upon the same footing as the adultery of the wife, and that adultery in either case dissolved the marriage. Ought there to be then such a dissimilarity between the law in one part of the country and in the other. In the recent committee witnesses were examined with respect to the marriage law of Scotland. Was there more licen• tiousness in Scotland where equality in diverce existed than in England where the righ't was confined to the hue hand. There was a greater power in Scotland to dis solve marriages, and why give greater facilities in one part of the kingdom than the other ? The then Lord Ad vocate and the Lord Justice of Scotland proved that the wife had equal power in respect to divorce with the bus band. The witnesses were of opinion that no evil would follow from giving wives power of divorcing husbands on account of adultery. The evidence of the Scotch law, so different to our own, showed that no evil could be anti,ii pated from allowing wives the power of divorce on the ground of adultery of their husbands. Lord Eldon, in Moffatt's case, expressed himself on the point in decided o te n rm th s e . g roThen ground p o u f l l o c r a n t e i lt n y f a o r d d a i v ri o n r i c t e e 1 s v v a . s L by w i i N i l E rs i . ,,, A , l n o a ff i i . t mitted the doctrine of the right of the wife to sue for divorce, and supported the second reading of the bill on the subject. His noble and learned friend had alte ed bis opinion respecting the practice of that house, and he would refer to his noble and learned friend, who would explain his own view and reason of change on the subject. With respect to the parties who had signed the commis sion there was one person who had on a previous occa sion expressed himself strongly on tee subject. He hoped he bad now shown that the weight of authority was net in favour of the bill, but against it, and he hoped, there fore, their lordship-, would refer the bill to a select corn mittee, and he would conclude by making his motion in the terms he had already given. Lord BROUGHAM seconded the motion. Anything more convincing, luminous, or more worthy of his noble and learned friend he had never before heard or could have imagined. The bill in question arose from a report from a respectable commissiou ; but as he differed from some of the conclusions of the report he was of opinion the question ought to be dealt with in a larger sense and on a wider basis. There was only one of two ways open to deal with the question—either to deal with it in a larger sense, or' to adopt the views of his noble friend opposite, to give no remedy by divorce at all. The practice of refusing remedy to one party as a matter of curse, and granting it to another as a matter of eeur s o, appeared to Hi m eo contrary to comeren sense, law, and humenitr, that he thought his noble and learned friend was justified in taking the stand he hail taken on the preeeet question. One case he recollected—that where a man heel been convicted, and had married ansther woman during the lif time of his wife, the wife was allowed a divorce. Another case of the grosses', cruelty and grievous and loathsome misconduct on the part of the husband he remembered, and that the remedy of a isuit for divorce was nearly refu-ed to the wife ; but it was considered so cruel not to relax the law that net last the suit was granted. Unhappily some facts came out j r-eative to the conduct of the wife, although the loath ' some conduct of the husband was proved beyond all doubt ; and this was mole the ground of refusing the prayer fir a divorce. He had al ways been of op melon that tne practice ought to he abided by, and that, ex cept in extreme ca4es, the suit of a wife tor divorce ought not tie be permitted. In Scotland it was asserted by the evidence sf the Lord Advocate that there were many more divorces by husbands than by wives. This was not correct. The number in four years ending 1840 was 20 in each year. In 1841 only 10 divorces were granted. 'rids tact was material to shosi, because it proved how groundles s was the fear that if the law of England as to divorce wa s placed on the game footing as the law o f Scotland the number of divorces would he endless. The return he referred to was not a return ter Edinburgh alone, but fur the whole of Scotland. Ha found that the proportion of divorcee, as far as regarded husband and wife, was nearly equal ; for every nine by wives, there appeared ten applications by husbands. These circumstances offered the strongest reasons for going before a committee, in order that all the facts might be frilly inq mired into. There was another great defect in the measure, by confining as it did the rem, dy to the hu diand in cases of desertion. Now he considered that desertion was even worse than cruelty, and that the wife ought to have her remedy jest the same as it was proposed to give the husband. There. was a society established to ascertain the wrongs of women, and he was over ehelmed with the evidence which bad been elicited. One case he mould mention—a husband had deserted his wife, and gone to live in a distant c a lony. The wife could not go into any court to ask to be divorced. It might be said she could come to that house for relief ; but unless she could bring 600/., and get a bill passed through that house, she would not have the ehadow of a shade of chance of getting a divorce. This husband might return a beggar from Australia, awl if his wife had accumulated property by her industry, he had a right to come and sweep the whale of it away. He would not go further into the gross cruelties and inhu tnanities which the present state of the law afforded im punity to. The system in this country was more bar barous and inconsistent than in any other country, and Ahenhaocpteirolnstoetpsc,would be taken to reform it effectually. compro mised by the defendant's family had been fo broughtror O /., in and the absence, of course of the wife , place in the Consistor _ Further proceedings which took 9 Court, however, showed that not only was no act of adultery committed,cnn could he committed. i i t was n physically impossibl e that it the meanwhile the poor woman had to be under the im putation of crime for 18 rnonthß. That, no doubt, was an extreme case ; but the general of that crier:. eon, actions were brought in the absence of the woman, and that she suffered from the verdict without the defending herself, was not an ext reme one. power of He (Lo r d Brough am ) wou ld suppose th e case of' an Enlish duke of 14 years of age entrapped into a Scotch marriage by a prostitute of '24. That marriage would carry all his estates and honours by the Scotch and also by the Eng. dish law ; and the unhappy young man would have no possible means of putting an end to it. It was a state of the' law which did no credit to the country. He (Lord Brouge ae o considered that the bill left th e wi f e worse than it f ound her under the present law, because the court could not extend the rule as the House of Lord - 4 did ; and therefore, on these grounds, he agreed with friends by means of their political opponents. That cer tainly was not the most pleasant positron in which a Whig Minister could be placed. Then there were other considerations which made it still more unpleasant to them. He found from an analysis before him that, al though the majority of hon. members in that house op posed to the ballot was considerable, yet that the num ber of the electors by whom they were returned was ridiculously small in comparison with the rest. Added to this, that tee maj eity of the non-electers in the coins try were decidedly in its favour, and centinuail:t ex pressed' themselves unwilling to accept any measure for the extension of the suffrage without the ballot. No ra tional man could arrive at any other conclusion, than that if it were put to the country generally, the majo rity in its favour would,be enormous. They had in that house about 244 gentlemen who had recorded their votes in favour of this principle ; they had at their back the flower of the electoral body, and they had the feeling of the people with them. To such a body, then, he would say nothing was impossible. How few years had elapsed since the attempt which was made to abolish the corn laws was termed by the First Minister of the'Crown—a Whig Minister—madness. Ho w long ago was itsince they followed into the lobby C. P. Villiers and a select body of gentlemen, whom sensible Whigs and sagacious Tories regarded as a select body of lunatics, and even the coun try gentlemen as they counted them at the lobby-door looked as if they nere much afraid they would bite them ? (Laughter.) All that had passed away, and what had tt ey in its place ? Wit% , like a dissolving view, there appeared that celebrated race between two celebrated statesmen, Sir R. Peel and L ;rd J. Russell, to see who should be first in at the death of the corn laws. Now he asked any hon. gentleman in that house whether be be lieved that that race would have been run if the people, booted and spurred, had not mounted on their shoulders and urged them on ? All he could say was that he hoped the people, assisted by some able groom—and there was one in-Richard Cobden ---would mount the shoulders of his noble friend on this occasion, and if they did, with all due respect to hi- noble friend, that they would not forget the old age, " Spare the rod and you will spoil the child." (Laughter) Such was the scarcity of argu ment, an I so threadbare bad the subject been worn, that there was no puny whipster of an editor publishing an obscure paper in an Irish hog, a Scotch moor, a Welsh mountain, or an English plain, who was not on this ques tion perfectly able to master the subject. Ile would now proceed to grapple with the various arguments which he had seen recorded. It was not his fault that people brought forward arguments which had been killed a thzen times over. No doubt they would be told that it was es warily, that it was un-Engli,h to vote for mem bers of Parliament by way or ballot, and he saw a right him, gentleman on the opposite side who used to be very fond of that argument. (Sir J. Greham bowed to the hon. gentleman.) He would , ay it appesred to him a mockery of c minion sense. (L niyh'er.) It was plain that the army and navy, the nobility and commonal,y of this country, voted entirely that way in their clubs ; and the logical consequeece was, that if , t was cowardly and un-Euelish, the' were a pack of c i'eards. (Renewed laughter.) Let them answer tor that. It was said that electors held the franchise in tru-t for the non-electors, and that the trust must be exercised openly. But that argumeet had been dealt with and destroyed by Mr. Grote and Sir W Mole , worth. Even admitting the franchise to be a trust, what was the definition of it- dis -1 charge ? If the elector voted for the man of his choice uninfluenced by sordid inetives surely he discharged his trust. But open vet ng by no mans showed whetie r this were so or not. The vote was open and the motive wan secret ; and open voting, so far from promoting the due discharge of trust, led rather to its breach. Tee pre vailing rule of bribery was that the money should not be paid before the vote was given. Take away the know. ledge of the vote and you upset the system of bribery, for the briber could have no confidence in the bribed. Bribery, however, was the least part of the evil. Intimi dation was the monster evil, and open voting was its life and its support. He would now call the attention of the house to the state of the ballot in Amsrita. It had been said . hat it was not used for secrecy, but merely for convenience. This was a mistake. The ballot arose in that country, like the game laws, from necessity. As o p ovulation increased intimidation arose, and teak its stand beside the voting urns. In those states in which the ballot was enforced the evil had been suppressed. Mr. Pierce, of Missachusette, bad written him a letter (le answer to inquiri .8 of his) fully establishing this. (l'he hon. gentleman proceeded to read the letter.) He had another letter to the same effect, from the ex-secre tary of state r Ma=sachussetts. In consequence of those ;Aeries 04 law ha 1 enforce f the ballot in that state. Tois was a picture of true Riglish intimidation. The tyranny of the laudocracy in this c tuntry was rivalled in America by the tyranny of the mercantile classes. The Americans, however, had done their best to remedy the evil, arid bad put their shoulders to the wheel to get out of the moral mire. This country preffrred to "stick in the mud " and wallow in corruption. Instead of any effective measure there had been that most ridieulous bill, the Corrupt Practices Prevention Bill, which had done all it was intended to do—viz., nothing. The hon. member read a speech of Mr. 'nth, at Bath, in which he said that he knew of several cases in which support- re of his h r l the "screw put on them ;" where upon Mr. Whately, the Tory candidate, said he had kn iwn of several of his Fuppirters who had been treated in the same way at B .stun. There existed a regular bend of inert who were organised for the purpose of bribery. There was the little town of Wells also. (Hear, and laughter.) That town had been the scene of a strik ing con est. " When Wh.g met Whig then came the tn.?, of were" (Laughter.) The hon. member read es ' tracts from two (hill/ papers, detailing the proceedir.gs of each p irry at the election referred to. Great complaints had be-n ma le of the, proceedings at the Rochester elec t on, the hon. reember elected for that place declaring that what he had seen practised there had decided him to vote for the ballot. The coostituency of Leominster had also petitioned in favour of secret votiog. But there hal also been an elec , ion for Midburst—a place which was a mere appurtenance to the Cowdery family. He admitted that the patron had recently exercised g iod taste in the nomination of members for this borough, her that patron had replaced a most popular member (Mr. Walpole) by another hon, and learned gentleman wee known to literary r a n e (Mr. Warree). (Hear.) He (Mr. Berkeley) was net at war with ither of those hen. And learned gentlemen, but with the system of open voting which they upheld. The present hon. and learned member, when addressing the electors, had hail the hardihood to tell them that their votes were unfettered, adding that, being their representative, be fe;t "a proud man, and their br ither." (A laugh.) Why, to hear such words ally one would think the hon. and learned member had bean reading hie own "Ten Thousand a Year," and had treated the constituency to a ceapter "Oly Ga Jim (L•tueeter ) fle (Ur. 8,-rho-ley) had no desire to exclude the aristocracy from the House of Coin mom,. Whisfeler there were the ballot or not, he should always like to see such ne, a Villiers, Stanley, Walpole, Duncan, and others be could name, in the II use ; hut he would take away the power of nomination, from a Darby, a Clarendon, an Eemont, or a C onperdo eon He ap pealed for support to tee Administrative Ref o-mere, who would have but little chance of success whist the British House of Commons was returned by the 11-Use of Peers. Sir DE LACY EVANS , seconded the motion; and there were immediate calls for a division. The SPEAKER having put the qu -siion, Mr. PEACOCKS, amidst marks of impatience, re minded the bon. member for Bristol, that whilst dealing copiously in general allegations against the present elec toral system, he had failed to adduce any individual in stances in support of his viesse. Net asi gle case of in timidetion had been adduced. The hon. member was bound to show that the ballot would protect the honest and conscientious voter. He (Mr. Peacock) was prepared to prove that it would not. On the contrary, the only man whom the sy-tem of secret voting would serve was the liar, the hypocrite, and the knave. So far from secret voting being a boon to the farmer or the tradesman, be believed that, harassed by the spy and the informer, men would sigh for a return to open voti-g a-id en appeal to the poll-book, It was impossible to lo )k to th • fi silty of the ballot without a f-elinz of alarm. The hon. mem ber said that under a system of secret voting there would be ro corruption. What, however, had b n proved in the case of Shoreham in 1781—a borough honk and sold by a club called the Ch enian Club, and conducted on Evangelical principles? Wild had subsseineetly been proved in the case of Sudbury and St. Alban's? The hon. member ( r Peso 'eke) preceded to point out the r!e• moralising efr cre f secret v ting in Ameriev, and par ticularly in Now York, and went on to contend that the change prop sad ire our electoral system ley tee intro duction of the ballot would lead, not only to an organised system of err option, but an organ'• ed system of fraud. (Hear, hear.) The working of the system on the large scale of a general election might be garb red from the action of the billet in a certain horticultural society in the north, where, instead of 29 votes being found in the ballot-box (the proper number), there were 49. (Hear, hear.) Had we had any reason to resort to secret voting, founded upon what had occurred abroad t There was a general feeling in France that the election of Louis Napoleon was not a fair election. No plan could be ;devised more likely to bring representative; govern ment into contempt and odium than the ballot. (Hear, hear.) If secret voting were extended to constituencies and not to the members of the House of Commons, a 101. oligarchy would beerected, who would be enabled to fashion legislation ace-wiling to their own par icular in terests, and shift burdens from their own shoulders to the shoulders of oth ers. (H ear , h ear. ) This inetion was not opposed in an anti-liberal spirit. (Hear, hear ) It was really opposed on the interest of the unen-frau chised. (Hear, hear.) It was opposed, also, because its opponents were unwilling to base our national represen tation on a system of universal lying and organised hypecrisy. (Hear, hear.) The calls for a division were repeated, and Mr. BERKELEY having said a few words in reply, The house then divided Ayes 111 Nees 151 Majority against the introduction of the bill 40 THE ECCLESIASTICAL COURTS, Mr. J. PHILLIMORE moved for leave to brine in a bill to take away from all archbishops, bishops, and ecclesiastical person s in England and Wales all /sewe r of appointing Judges and Chancellors, and vesting such powers in the Lord Chancellor. The motion was seconded by Mr. HADFIELD. The SOLICITOR -GENERAL did not oppose the motion, and did not believe it was the wish of the house that any opposition should be offered to the introduction of a measure to remedy a crying evil, which, he said, would have been removed if the bill brought into the House of Lords had not met with an opposition which had proved fatal. He made some observations upon the difficulties encountered in the house, including unprofit able talk, in passing the measures for the reform of ecclesiastical jurisdiction. - * Mr. GLADSTONE, with reference to these observa tions, accused successive Administrations of not setting their shoulders seriously to the wheel in grappling with THE MARITIME LAWS. The Earl of ELLENBOROUG3-Ef said his attention bad been called to the subject of our maritime laws, which had been referred to in the declaration made at the recent conference held at Paris. It appeared to him that the language used on that occasion left the ques tion in a very vague and unsatisfactory state. It was highly desirable that the true meaning and intention of the expression used should be clearly understood. With a view of effecting that object, it was his intention to lay upon the table some resolutions upon the subject he in tended to propose, Re thought it desirable that the purport of these resolutions be clearly understood before his noble friend (Lord Colchester) brought forward his motion on the subject, which stood on the paper for Thursday next. DIVORCE AND MATRIMONIAL CAUSES BILL. The LORD CHANCELLOR moved the second read ing of this bill, and shortly stated the marriage law as it existed at a very remote pined down to the present time, as well as the practice of the E4tablished Church and the Church of R .me in respect to divorce. The law upon the subject was in a very unsatisfactory state, and it ought to be remedied. A commission sat a few years ago, at which the Lord Chief Justice was at the head, and it was on the recommendation of that com mittee that the present bill was founded. In the present bill he proposed that instead of those various and costly proceeding.; which were necessary under the present law that a competent court should at once be constituted, which would have full jurisdiction to incolire into the matrimonial cases brought before it, and if the charge of infidelity was proved to grant a divorce. He proposed that this oourt should supersede the necessity of actions for crint, con., which he always con sidered of a very revolting nature. He did not propose to abolish such actions if the parties desired to have re course to them ; but they sboul I not be a necessary pre liminary proceeding to the obtaining of a divorce. He further proposed that the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Chief Justice of the Queen's Bench, and another judge, should preside in the court, and that there should be an appeal to the House of Lords, as in all other cases. This court is not to try cases at the instance of the wife, and the law would, therefore, remain precisely in the same state as it was at, present. It had been sug gested that the bill should be extended to Ireland. To such a course he should not object, provided it was the opinion of a majority of the house. Lord LYNDETURST had thought it his duty to con sider with much attention the bill of his noble and learned friend, but notwithstanding the respect he enter tained for him he must say that he thought the measure ought not in its present shape to pass into a law. So far from rendering the situation of the wife better, it would render it much worse than it was at present. Considering, therefore, the bill, the interesting moire of its subject, and the exteneive application it would have, ho thought, notwithstanding the inquiries that had taken place, that the whole matter ought to be re ferred to a select committee. He was confirmed in this opinion from what he had heard stated by a minister of the Crown, a gentleman of great learning and command. ing talents. A few months after the bill of 1854 was withdrawn, the learned individual to whom he referred stated, in a place pretty well known, his opinion on the subject, and his sincere and earnest hope that when another bill was brought in, due care and attention would be paid to the woman and to the cruelty arid hardship to which she was exposed. Supported by such an opinion, he ventured to suggest that the whole matter ought to be referred to a select committee. There were many questions of great importance connected with the bill, arid with the relations of husband and wife. The matters of which the female had a right to complain were—fir-t, as respected property ; secondly, as re spected personal protection ; thirdly, as respected actions of erine con. ; and fourthly, as regarded actions for di vorce. It would not require many observations to ex plain those four points. With respect to property, he was not attempting to interfere with property between man anti wife when living together in harmonious con nection, bat when separated in consequence of the mis conduct of the husband by a sentence of the ecclesiasti cal court. At present the law was that the woman's property belonged to the husband. If a legacy were left to a woman so separated from her husband, or if she suc ceeded to personal property, it belonged to her husband. The husband could seize it, and he generally did seize it. He ha - I known cases in which the wife bad never enjoyed property so left to her. I.; was a gross inequality, con sequent upon the present law of divorce, and ought to be eta. r;ght. Again, if a wife succeeded to real property by devise or inheritance, the husband, notwithstanding the separation, occupied it during life. Much worse than that, if the wife tried to eke out a scanty sub sistence for herself and children by instruction, the husband. could seize her gains and give them to his mistress. Surely some provi , ion ought to be made, in legislating on the law of divorce, to sit such a question right. With time exception of a scanty allowance io the shape of alimony, the per sonal preperty of the wife belonged to the husband, and be might assign or bequeath it, and leave her and her children destitute. There was no reciprocity or equality in such a case. I. hail been sal I that marriage settlements would prevent such things being done, but they well knew that settlements were confined to per sons in a certain rank of life, and that nine-tenths of the marriages took place without any settlement. Another !! point was, that a woman separated from her husband by sentence of the ecclesiastical court, in consequence of his misconduct, his adultery, or cruelty, was almost in the condition of an outlaw. She could enter into no contract, not even into a lease for her residence. She was liable to injury by violence and insult in -every way, and her character might be traduced without her having a civil remedy. That was not a state of things to be continued. When a husband brought an action against a supposed paramour he asked for damages as a solatimn for his injured honour. It was altogether an affeir of money. But to the wife it was an affair of life and death. She bad no refuge. Nobody would countenance her ; and no society would admit her. Was that a state of things which ought to be al lowed to continue? In any action of that sort, although she had everything at stake, she was not all Owed to ap pear. That also was a subject which deserved to be con sidered. They all knew that a bill passed through that house on this subject 40 years ago by a large majority, and that, though supported in the other house by Mr. Pat, Mr. Wyndham, and Mr. Wilberforce, and other eminent men, it was there lost. With respect to the law of divorce, their lordships knew that it was administered solely by the ecclesiastical courts. As had been stated by hid noble and learned friendgdivorcen were of twin kinde —a men et atop°, and divorces a vinculo matrimonii. No divorce a z - inculo was granted by the ecclesiastical courts except for grounds that existed before marriaec ; but divorces a mensa were granted for cruelty and adul tery. Since shortly after the Reformation marriage was not dissolubl e by an lation y proceeding s s h ort of lege , and marriages could now oniy be dissolved by acts passed in individual cases. This practice had been .productive of greet inconvenience. Every body had exclaimed against it—the expense was enor mous, 700/, or 8001. in ordinary cases, in some instances more ; and, consequently, it was only certain privileged classes that could obtain a divorce. Several attempts to effect a change in the law had been made, but without success. His noble and learned friend on the woolsack now proposed a new tribunal for divorce cases. Such a tribunal should be accessible not merely to the upper classes, but to persons of moderate means. But, accord ing to the bill before them, there would have to be an investigation into each case bef ire two jud t e e , to examine and decide. To that he did not (eject ; but though the object was to have a cheap tribunal the bill provided that after decision by the tribunal either of the parties might appeal to the Home of Loris for its rival decision. Their lordships [Meta either confirm the decision or direct the court below to examine new witnesses or former witnesses, on a new fact, and might direct issues to be tried. His noble and learned friend had establi s h ed all this complicated machinery for a tribunal which was intended for persons of moderate mans. Re doubted whether it would not occasion inure expense than the la w as it now steod did. But the prin ciple of the bill was that a married woman was to have no remedy in a cu e of adultery, however atr oc i ous might be the co n d uct of her husband in connection with it. The conduct on his part might be so infannms that it might be a horror for the wife to be connected with such a man, yet the only ground on which the wife was to have a claim to a divorce was in case of incest on the part of the husband. It was said that adult er y on the rit o the part of the wif e m i g ht b r i ng spurious issue gt family, b u t did i t f o ll ow that circumstancesmih such a s t o ren d er i t necessary that the merria;e should be dissolved for other causes ? If a woman was m arr i ed to a man notorious for atrocious cruelties and Tor his infamous conduct —to a man living in open adultery., was she not, under such circumstances, to be relieved from her married obligations ? His noble and learned friend bad looked to the ease of the husband, and had regarded him ,merely ae somewhat profligate ; but what was the situation of the woman ? Her hopes were blighted ; she was driven from her home, perhaps sepa rated from her children, doomed to live almost alone in seclusion, with no one on whom to fix her affections ; exposed to the arts and designs of a b ase and profligate man, scarcely able by any care or caution to avoid the tooth of calumny or slander, and living on the brink of desolatinn. Such was the stite of the woman. Re bad d escrihed the state of the wrong-doer, and he would ask their lorlships whether the law ought to be allowed to continue in its present state ! The noble and learned lord said that the wife was to have no relief except in cases of incest ; burhe might take another case, and suppose a husband living in open adultery, and cone znitting some infamous crime which brought upon him a sentence of transportation. Was the woman to be tied to such a monster ? (lima bear.) He might sup pose cases in which attempts had been made on the life of the Woman, and other cases equally strong. The bill, as be had said, wou ld place the woman in a worse situation than she was in at present, for at present she might apjoettl to-that house and state all the circum stances of her . case—the infamous conduct of her bus band, and their lordships-had-the diecretion to decide in CELESTINA SONIERS. Mr. WARREN asked the Secretary for the Home Department whether the adviser:► of the Crown, in re commending a, commutation of the sentence of death lately pAised o, Celeitina Sooiers at the C-_ , ntral Crimi nal Court for the murder of her child, had ootained the report and taken the opinion of the judge by whom she had been tried ; and, if so, whetner there was any objection to laying them before the house r Sir G. GREY said the Secretary of State was exclu sively aoswerahle for recommending a commutation of the sentence in this instance, fie did not feel himself justified'in laying the opinion of the learned judge who tried the case on the table of the boo :e. It was a con fidential communication to the Home Secretary, and he alone was responsible for the commutation of the sen tence. TANK RUPTS. Henry Stuart and E erd Kennett, tailors, Burlington gardens, to surrender • Juno 3, at two, and July 1, at twelve, at the Court o E Bankruptcy. Lee, official assig nee, Aldernianbury ; I, 'dchLards, Warwick -street, Regent street. Charles Erewell, buil, toy, Saffron Walden, Essex, June 3 at half•past two, and ! duly 1, at on , at the Court of Bankruptcy. Lee, of Ue i. 31 assignee, Aldermanbury ; Marhy, Whitehall-place ; Collin, Saffron Walden. Robert Johnson, furni turd 13.-oker, York. June 3 and 24 at eleven, at the Leeds i District Court. Hope, official as signee, Leeds; Walker, York; Bond and Barwick, Leeds. Charles Bradshaw, lice aced victlialler, M - inchester, June 2 and 21, at twelve, at the District Court Manchester. Pott, official assignee, AI trtabester; Cobbett and Wheeler, Manchester. John D ivies, printer, ;hrewsbury,' June 5 and 26 at half-past eleven, at the Bfr mingham District Court. Bit• tloston, official assignee, Biz rningham ' • H. T. and G. W ace, Shrewsb ur y ; M otteram anc I Kuight, B. irmingliam. George Binns, cloth ma . aufacturer, Ilartshead Moor, Yorkshire, JUDO 5 and July 4, at eleven,, at the Leeds Dis trict Court. Young, offici d assignee, Leeds ; Jackson, Checkheaton ; Cariss and C adworth, Le eds. Benjamin Hawthorn, abs e mercer, Li sle-street, Leices ter•square, May 28, and Jo ly ?, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Graham, alit ial assignee; _Laurence, S m ith , and Fawdon, B rea d- s t ree , City. John Howard Blacks n3ll, and George :Bennet, iron masters, Sineth wick. btu: Tordshire, June 2ai id 23, at half past ten, at the Birming' ram District Court. Bittleston, official assignee, Birming lam ; Bourne, Wail iwright, and Bourne, Dudley; T. S. J acmes, Birmingham. Angel Emmanuel Giu Aid. merchant, St. Mary-axe, City, June 3, at half-p9f it twelve, and July 1, at one, at the Court of Bankruptc: f. Lee, official assignee, Alder manhury ; Lint:later an .d Havkwood, ta• Hobert Samuel Lund ie, wood engraver, Loi , g-acre, May 31, at half-past ( doyen., and June 25, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Nicholson, official assign se, Basing hall-street ; Whit e and Cole, Martins-lane, CU) :. DECLA .:RATION OF DIVIDENDS. W. Bromley, G ray's-inn-square, scrivener—th ird div', of 1 1-16 d. in the po uud, Thursday, May 22, and three sub sequent Thursday; 1, at the office of Mr. Graham, Coleman• street. MANCHESTER, MAT 20. BTOCIC EXCEIANGE.—This market bas been dolor- I' fair business today, b a t p r i ces closed weaker as 0,, lows : M anchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire, 291 _..' I . Midland Rail wa y C onsole, 773 i—South Easters Doyen, 21 9-16 f —Manchester and Birmingham C. Q__„l' i p.—North Western, 63—Cheshire Junctions, 17j i F Leeds, 91 901 1. PAIRS. SECRET TREATY. In reply to a from the Marquis of GRANBY, Lord PALMERSTON Raid no other treaty but that laid on the table bad been concluded by the allied Powers. FOB AGAINST. Sir Charles Napier ......... with M r . Th ornhill Admiral Berkeley .......... „ Colonel Harcourt Mr. 0. Ricardo ............... „ Mr. Evelyn Denison Mr. Bass ..................... „ Mr. G. Cavendish Mr. S. Ricardo ............... „ Mr. P. Bonne-t-t Sir E. Perry .................. „ Sir H. Maddox Mr. Jackson ..... ............. „ Sir John Pakington Lord Uxbridge „ Colonel Smyth Ur. T. A. Bellew „ Mr. G. E. Heneage Sir J. Shelle Mr. . Milligan ~ Lord Je rm y n Mr. gr egson „ Mr. Baring Mr. R. Sheridan Mr. Lock . ~Mr. Ker S e y wer Mr. Crsbbett Mr. M ar j or i b anks „ Mr. G. He a th co t e Mr. Sch o l e fi e ld ~Mr. Napi er Sir J. D u k e Mr. &lied° . „ Mr. H. B ar i ng Sir Geor ge D as h wood „ Colonel Maxwell Colonel Clifford Mr. T. K enne d y Mr. F. B. Beamish ,, Colonel B o ld ero Mr. T. S DuncombeMr. Fuller Mr. Poll ar d Urquhart....,. „ „ Mr. Corry Colonel Ty n t e Mr. J. A. Smith „ Mr. Spo oner Mr. Mill s S.r W. Clay „ Sir W. Gallwey Mr. Deasy „ Mr. F tzgerald The A ttoruey-General „ Mr. Walpole Mr. Bell John Johnstone. Mr. Kni g ht an d Mr. Graves Sawle were accidentally shat out of the Division on the Ballot last night. BIRMINGHAM, MAT 20. iTACH EXCHANGE. —There has been a brisk bußiv ed Gtor-eday,Wheustterpnrise,esn B ir m i ngham•ere a s shade p a de re flatter f.. lo th t. an 3 37 d e . s_te o rd r it' Westerns, 61.--Lond o n an d N orth Western, 101. 1 lub m Birmingham Canal, new, 221. CORPORATION REFORM BILL. In reply 0) Alf. BALL, Sir G. GREY - -aid he did not think this bill could be .akeu into consideration before Monday next. THE LATE FA. PA L ACCIDENT AT WOOLWICEI. In reply t o Mr. M. CHAMBERS, Mr. F. PEEL said he was unable to say whether the accident at Woolwich arose from the men being engaged in manufacturing percussion caps or the fire works for the ensuinir peace celebration. THE BALLOT. Mr. H id. BERKELEY sa that, pursuant to the no tice he h a d g i ven, he rose to renew Ina entreaties to the house to penal him to pass such a measure as might extr.cf,te the elector., of Great Britain and Ireland from the sad state of humiliation and degradation into) which, ali he thought, they were at present plunged t',rough 'he instrumentality of ~ pen voting. It was, inde e d, an un pleasant task to undertake, becan,e while acknowledging the indolence he ead ever receive.' fr en the house, and especially from h in. gectlemen opposed to him in polities, he at the same tune knew the questi.m was so abliorraot to many members that he should not be sur prised if, applying to him the words of the poet, they should may that he was about— " To cleave The general ear W 'h Sysiphian a s was the ith tas orrent k he had peec uudertaken, if he could only roll the stone to the summit of the hill, or even only halt way, he felt a conviction that it would be sustained by the labours of those who succeeded him, and that the people weuld, through the spread of education, the more general diffusion of knowledge, and a proper apprecia tion of the value of the franchise, be enabled to claim that as a right which lie was nom humbly craving for them as a boon. Before he proceeded to grapple more closely with the question he might, perhaps, be permitted to point out to the house the precise position iii which it stood. When last be had the honour of addressing them on this subject he instanced a vast number of members in that house, and ofdi.thigai-bed persons out of it, who at one period or other had advocated this question. The great inajerity of these might still retain their convictions. Some, it was true, had changed their opinions ; but it was remarkable that many of those who had changed their opinions had likewise changed their politica ; and the few who had not changed their politics bad changed their con stituencies, and instead of representing large free bo roughs, in which something like public opinion existed, they now represented counties, where the ballot was deemed a litresy against the landlords, or those rotten boroughs, which wer e a ll owe d t o bl ur the f a i r face of the Reform ll to please a Whig nobility, ;:n i from a partici pation in which they were unable to exclude the Tories, such b9rouvhs being, therefore, as much their own as ,their houses in Belgravia or Grosvenor-park, Ile confessed that he could not view this as a party question, and 1`,f39 unable so to argue it. It had, however, been made a party question by the Tory gentlemen in tbis country. Me had nothing to do with that ; he should treat it as an o Den question above board. Tree, it had been made an o , Oen question by Whig Ministers. Was he grateful fir ti tat ? He confessed that he was not, because he knew that a Whig Ministry dare not make it a close question. 1 If they did, the majority of their supporters being in its favour, they would lose their places. This was a very un- Plea sant question for a Whig Ministry to cope with, for many reasons. In the first place, when they attempted to reply to the arguments in favour of the ballot they li,okad to the opposite benchesior cheers, and when they went into the lobby they went in a 8 elept body opposed to the: h. friends, and joined themselves on to the tail of the Tories, thereby securing a victory over their own LEEDS, MAT 2n. STOCK EXCHANGE. —The sales this morning were the following rates :—Midlands, 771 774—Dovers, 21i North Ea.tern, Leeds, 161—Lancashire and Yorksilir 914 91—North Western, 6—Norfolk, 55. DUBLIN —MAT 19. STOOK EXORANGE.—Three per Cent. Console, vza Ditto for Account, 9th June, 93 j—Ditto, for now A. olnnt, 9th of Juno, 0 New 3 per Cent. Stock, 92i —Ditto, for Account, 9th of June, 934—Great Southe r " and Western, 5 2—Mining Company of Ireland, 14 , 1 1 Grand Canal Co., 3R :3—Dublin and Belfast Junction, n —Killarney Junction, 9,;—Bank St oc k, 224- ,—Mid l 3 o l Great Western an d RI . Canal, 50i 51—Waterford 04 Limerick, for acc oun t , 224 —Dublin and Kingstown, I°`" D. Davis, New itgton-causeway, glass rst div. of ls. 2d. i n t h e pound, Thursday, May 22mere Lant—fi , :and three subsequent Thur idays, at th e o ffi ce of Mr. Grab a in, Cole man-street. G. Lea, Eccles ton Coal Wharf, Upper Belgr ~ve.place, Pimlico, and Nu ehetbd-lane coal merchant--see, )n d di v. of 21d. in th e poun 1, Thursday, May 22, and tt ,ree suh:e quentreet. Thursdays,. at the office of Mr. Grahaix , Coleman st METROPOLITAN BOARD OF WORKS —A meeting Wee held, in the Council Chamber, Guildhall, to.daYF .it twelve o'clock-1. To receive memorial from the vestry of the parish of Rotberhithe, Surrey, objecting sewageto certain in portions tercep Io n,. of c th , e engineer'ssouth of th s e T che h m a e me tZ a t a l' a e i praying that the same may be modified ; 2. To read letter from Mr. J. J. Morewood, relative to the Great London Drainage scheme ; 3. To consider further the report of the eneineer of the hoard on the sewage inter' ception and main drainage of the districts south of the Thames. I THE FERMOT PEERAGH.-Eight of the l earne d j u d ges pronounced an opinion on Monday in the House of Lords, 1 that the Act of Union with Ireland did not warrant the Government on the extinction of three neerares in the creation of a barony of F,romy in favour of Mr. David Roche ; and several of the judges, including the Chief Baron, intimated that it was an attempted innovation orr the recognised practice of half a century. The accusa tion against Lord Palmerston of having advi-ed her Majesty to make an unauthorised exercise of ber pre r , •gative may now he taken as suffi_iiently established ; and it may also be taken as established that M. Roche is not a peer, for, although there has been a'i extinction of an Irish peerage since the issue i.f the patent, that will not make a creation good which it appears was bad at iti iaception. If Mr. Riche's political serviee.s are to be rewarded with a peerage there must be a new creation. W. Oaler, Earl- street, Finsbury, cab provie tor and car rier —first div. of 51. in the p , ,uud, any Wed n ssday, at the office of Mr. Whi Basinghall-street. T. Vasty and E H. Owen, Strand, publ 13hers, book sellers, and stati mers—first &v. of 1!s. 6d. i 11 the pound, Thursday, May 22, and three subsequent, Cluirsdays, at the office of Mr. Stansfeld, Basinghall-strr,et. C. Goode, Grt , at Yarmouth. baker anYl cob fectioner— first div. of 34e .. in the pound, Thursday.,, M.: k y 22, an d three subse qu e r • t Th ursdays, at the of ce of Nr . Stansfeld, Basinghall-st re et. E. and S. 'Benson, Mansfiel.l-street, 1 ?Cl rtland-placo. hotel and bY girding-house keepers—first div of 3s. in the pound, Thu rs.tay, May and three sub serpent Thurs days, at the., office of Mr. Stansfeld, Ba4ing . hall , treet. G. Parsoas, Birmingham, b rassfounder and gas fitting manufact'arelr— first div. of 2s. 2d. in t he pound, any Thursday-, at the office of Mr. Christie, Bi aningharn. SCOTCH SEQUESTKATIO3 George Doivden Chornar, merchant arra flower dealer, Glasgow, at the Waverly Tavern, Georg 8 - aciu are. Alexander Melville, commission agi ; I A , and drysalter Wright: I, and founders, Canal Basin ' Giasgos.,-, at the Globe Hotel, George', . s q I are. Adam Malcolm and John Turnbu e nAneers, mill- Horr,c© Fenwick, underwriter, D , , lee.. Thomas Easton, innkeeper, Deny 4 _ , ‘4; 1 : "VC rllngBLllre• , e 4 )4rA 14, Glasgow. [ADTRILTISEMENT.] - Among the numerous extraordinary cures without medicine effected by Du Barry's delici.,us health-restoring Revalenta Arabica Food of Indigestion (Dyspepsia), Flatulency, Constipation, Nervous, Bilious, and Liver Complaints, Cough, Asthma, Consumption, and Debility, the following are not the least remarkable : Cure No. 47,121. —Miss Elizabeth Jacobs, of Nazing Vicarage, Waltharncross, Herts : a cure of extreme nervousness, indigestion, gatherings, low spirits, and nervous fancies. Cure No. 48,314.—Mi5s Elizabeth Yeoman, Gateacre, near Liverpool : a cure of ten years' dyspepsia and all the horrors of nervous irritability. 12, Patrick street, Cork, 4th mo., 4th, 1819.—Respected Friend,--I have given your ..krabica Food to a girl of fifteen, who during the last seven years has not been a day without vomiting fifteen or sixteen times, and sometimes oftener. The fourth day after she commenced your food vomiting ceased altogether, and sho has not thrown up since ; her health is improving wonderfully. WILLIAM MARTIN', M.D.— Supported by testimonials from the celebrated Professors of Chemistry Dr. Andrew Ure ; Dr. Shorland ; Dr. Harvey ; Dr. Campbell ; Dr. Gattiker ; Dr. Warzer; Dr. Ingram ; Lord Stuart de Decies; the Dowager Countess of Castle- Stuart ; Countess of Uffingtou ; Major-Gen. Thomas King ; and many other respectable persons, whose health has been restored by it, after all other means of cure had failed. In canisters, 51bs. ' Ils.; 121b5., 22 5.; super re fi ne d , llb., fie. ; 2 1 bs., us. ; 51bs., 225. ; 101bs., 335. The 101bs. and 121bs, carriage free, on receipt of post-office ord9r. Barry du Bairy an d C o., - 77, Regentstreet, - Loudon; - Fortnum, Nttson and Co., Purveyors to iier Majesty, Piccadilly ; also at 60, Gracechurch-street ; 333 and 451, Strand; 1, Cheapside; 68, Ccruhill ; 49, Bishopsgate-street ; 55, Char ing-cross; 64, Upper Baker-street; 63 and 150, OxfPrd. street. PRICE OF GOLD. —The ( nfo lot" itio '_gold at Paris is about 5 per iniile premium (a' cording to the last tariff), which, at the English Mint 'price of f :1. 17s. 101 d. p er oz. for standard gold, gives an exchang eof 25.29{ ; a-d, the exchange at Paris on Londo n at F port being 25.40, it follows that gold is about 0.41 per cent dearer in 1.4. n• don than in Paris. By advices from I fambnrg the price of gold is 426 k per mark, which, at the English Mint price of 3/. 17s. 101 d. per oz. for star), lard gold, gives an exchange of 13.5 i ; and, the exchang eat Hamburg on London at short being 13.6 i, it folio vs that gold is 047 per cent. dearer in London than i ft Hamburg. The course of exchange at New Ycrk on London fir bills at 00 days' sight is 110 per cent., and, the par_ of exchange between England and America beii , g. - 109 0 3-40 per cent., it follows that the exchange is none 'kin 0 42 per cent. in favour of England ; and, after tr king allowance for charges of transport and difference cent rate leaves , a small profit c :of interest, the pre a the importation o t gold fro m th e U n i ted States. BIRTHS. 01 ♦ SON. On the 18th inst., at Glynn, Cornwall, Lady Vivian. On the 19th i ns t., a t Cl apham-park, Surrey, the wife of John Charles Andreae, Esq. OF A DAUGHTER. On the 19th inst., at Chesham-place, the lion. Mrs. It Cavendish. On the 19ih inst., at Cottesmore Rectory Rutland, the Hon. Mrs. Andrew Stu ar t. , MARRIED. On the Bth inst., at Godalming, John Fraser, Esq., of Furnival's•inn, and Walworth, to Jane, youngest daugiv ter of the late Win. Franci s Pirnm, Esq., of Marlyns, neat' Guildford. Win.On, t e be ha r l l 4 e t s h , i s n e s e t o . n , d a s t o N n a o p f l , m a . t s t ta h n e ro ß r i d i , ti F, s o g t f t i b o s ni city, to Rosa &lin eldest daughter of the late Mr. S5ll - Melga, of Rome. DIED. On the lfltb inst., at Chesham-street, Belgrave-equart. William Ev ans , E sq .. o f T wynersh, Chertsey, late Sher . of London and Middlesex. Oa the 18th inst., at Ilfracombe, Devon, Sir Jam es Meek, Kt., C.B. On the I , th inst., at 18, Portman square, Emilylsabel:* third (laughter of Spencer Perceval, Esq. On the 17th inst., at Newtown, Limdvada co. London' derry, Lesley Alexander, Esq., late of the 11th Hussar% On the 14th inst., a t St o k e, near Rochester, Ken t, the Rev. James Warson, vicar, aged 64. On the sth inst., before Sebastopol, Edward Dicks% Ricard, Ensig n i n th e 18th R .yal Irish R eg t., a nd eldes t son of Captain E. Rican], late of the 75th and 73d Begts" aged 17. , LONDON: Printed and Published by MURDO YOUNO of No. 112, Strand, Printer, at The &tn Office, No. 112 r Strand, in the Precinct of the Savoy, in the yountY of Middlesex, Wednesday, May 2]. 1b,6. ouit.lic a ccord] The are b o y, kro Prern roll( t Pros 'Ondoi at 8 Stall! a rTi IL L. only) and n 2 , 4 ,a by Shirai Pric e t t. -~_ tt j t , O ^„ List. -akk ,_ _ Sp RJ 0 1 et! 5 %000' „ Ifte, 41:1,11 . _______ Th e . head 1:,1 131a, th an 0 Che, Su ll' 1111, vrithoi (Pa .....„. T 8 I be h