The Sun. — London, England, 1834-08-26 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. There is not perhaps a Journal in the British domi nions which has not at times been supposed, by some class of persons, to be honest and sincere, with the single exception of the Times. We believe that jour nal may fairly claim the distinction of having never been once supposed, even by those whose cause it was advocating, and powerfully advocating, to be actuated by any regard for truth and honesty. We say power fully advocating, because though the Times is often coarse and vulgar, both in sentiment and language, we will not be so unjust as to deny to our contemporary the praise of thundering occasionally to some purpose. Its mercenary character and its energy are quite dis tinct. Its advocacy may be insincere, and yet effec tive. A hired assassin may deal as heavy a blow as if his arm were raised in a good cause. The Times knows that it is necessary for its interest that it should be thought capable of doing mischief—and provided it do the job effectually, it is never scru pulous as to the means. The object of the Times has been for some time to break up the present Ministry. Knowing that Lord Brougham is an important and in fluential Member of the Cabinet—that he is a man who occupies a large space in the public eye, its blows are now more particularly directed against his Lord ship. / Availing itself of scraps of information derived from its late connection with the Government, it pre pares, day after day, a dish of scandal for the public at the expense of his Lordship, in which, though all may not be falsehood, yet a false colouring is given to the whole. Hi s L or d s hi p may not be wi thout his faults (who is without faults ?) but where is the man who has laboured more for the public good than he has done ? Has he not done more than any other public man for the reformation of our laws ? Was it not to him that the nation chiefly owes the impulse which the public mind has received towards education ? Did he not labour assiduously with Wilberforce for the abolition of the Slave Trade ? Has he not contributed largely towards the exposure of the abuses of the Church ? In short, what reform in Church and State has not been advanced by Henry Brougham ? Is he yet suspected of entertaining any wish which has not the improvement of the country for its object ? The Times says that for 15 years it be lieved Lord Brougham to be " actuated by honourable and elevated motives--guided by fixed and enlightened principle"—and all at once it sees him possessed of every vice and meanness that can deform a character. The base lie carries with it its own refutation. To whom is so glaring an incongruity addressed ? They must be idiots and drivellers indeed, who can believe that any other than base motives dictate the accusa tion. Disappointed ambition, or mortification of some sort, has led to the disgusting exhibition of a jour nalist endeavouring to destroy to-day the public man who was yesterday his idol. We are not blind to the faults of Lord Brougham--we have never been his flatterer—we have unsparingly pointed out his in consistencies, and are not unaware of the source of most of them ; but we should despise ourselves if we saw a base attempt to assassinate morally a great public man, and not contribute what in us lies to defeat it. Why, we ask, has Lord Brougham so con stantly been an object of hatred to all who live on corruption ? Why has he been singled out as the special object of the vituperation of the John Bull and other slanderous papers devoted to the enemies of good government ? Why is he so hated by all High Churchmen and Ultra Tories ? Because they did not fail to see that he was actuated by a restless ambition to introduce improvements into the institutions of the country, and to destroy abuses. They were not de ceived into the belief that Lord Brougham ever was or could become their ally. They were not taken by the attempts occasionally made by Lord Brougham to stand well with them. If Lord Brougham has any weak ness, it is that he thinks himself more cunning than he really is. He does not, however, deceive his opponents by what sometimes alienates from him his friends. But why dwell alone on the weaknesses of a man, who has done more than any public man of his time for the public good ? 'We are sure that a generous people like the English will resent this base and unmanly attiltnpt to 'run down a great public character. Who would be ambitious of serving the public, if his ser vices are to obtain the reward of his being held up by the press as the basest and most unworthy of mankind? The Tory Journals are, of course, all overjoyed at the exertions of the Times. The Morning Post of yes terday is pleased to assume that Lord Brougham is as tricking and slippery as Times, and hints that it may be doubted whether the conflict be any more than a sham fight. The character of the Times, drawn by our contemporary the Post, may be admitted as true, because the Times has always acted from selfish motives ; but Lord Brougham, we may be sure, is not hated by the Tories because he is an enemy of the people.—Morning Chronicle. The respect and good wishes which accompany Lord Grey into retirement will not be at all diminished by the sentiments contained in his late speech at New castle—a speech, by the bye, as remarkable for what it omits as what it contains ; for though the Noble Earl's relinquishment of office was the sole immediate cause and motive of the honours he was then replying to, not a word does he utter which can be construed to throw the smallest light upon the circumstances which led to his retirement. The country in general, however, we are convinced, stand in no need of being enlightened upon the subject. They are satisfied that the late Premier was the victim of a base intrigue ; an inference to which Lord Grey's silence may be said to give an unqualified assent. Not the least remarkable feature in Lord Grey's address to his surrounding friends and admirers is the candour with which he alludes to the defects which have become but too apparent in the reformed House of Commons. Lord Grey possesses none of that irrational fondness whieh can see no faults or failings in its own offspring ; for though reform has bee n hi s f avour i te child—the hope of his youth, and the fruition of his age, and as sfich might excuse a little of a parent's blindness, Lord Grey, while he boasts with feelings of becoming pride of the boon which he has bestowed upon the country, sees and points out with equal truth and force the unlooked-for obstacles which retard its complete siccess. One, and, perhaps, the most striking of the results alluded to, consists in the description of persons which both the new and the old constituency have, un fortunately, in too many instances, sent to Parlia ment ; in some instances amounting to the very worst selection that human ingenuity could have palmed upon them. We are prepared for the tone of triumph with which this avowal will be received by the enemies o f all reform. But the disappointed outcasts of SChedule A must be moderate in their exultations. While we admit, with regret, that the first reformed 'louse of Commons has not fully answered public ex pectation, the evil is only a temporary one, and will, we have no doubt, be remedied whenever the elective franchise comes again into general operation. At all events, if what we have received by means of the leform Bill is no t as yet a ll t h at we looked for, about what the country got rid of there can be "no mistake." Schedule A was at any rate an unmixed and unequivocal good. As far as that goes, any change must have been for the better. Variou s reasons may be assigned for the first reformed House not answering in every respect public expecta tion—among these the most prominent are, the no velty of the thing itself, the state of excitement in which the country, but especially the new constituencies, was placed, and the confidence felt that the Miuisters who had conferred such a boon upon the country would be prepared to carry out their measure in its true spirit. But that a permanent good may not have been pro ductive of the immediate good which was to be ex pected from it—that the Members of the first re formed Parliament should not be in all respects such as the country wished to see, are no grounds for despair or apprehension. Grown wise by what they are - witnessin g , the electors throughout the kingdom will, we have no doubt, exercise their franchise for the future with more caution. Empty, vapouring, all promising inanity will not only have found its OWD weight, but will act as a beacon to warn electors against any attempt at renewed imposture. Nor un der these impression s do we at all despair of E a rl Grey living to' seg : th e great measure of his public life conferring upon the country that full !need of l /(l/ } i I•i~ }*~~: ~'„ benefit which it was his object that it should accom plish.—Morning Herald. The Ministerial or O'Connell party in Ireland are attempting to get up two distinct movements in coun • teraction of the late proceedings of the Protestants and Conservatives of that country. One of these move ments is under the immediate inspection and control of the great agitator himself. It is the Catholic move ment, by means of which the established system of re sistance to the law is to be rendered, if possible, more perfect and universal than it has yet been ; by means of which active is to be substituted for passive resis tance, wherever local circumstances appear to render the former the more eligible of the two for the pur poses of the conspirators. The secondary and subor dinate movement is intended to promote the object of the same party in a different way, that is, by effecting a division of the Protestant Clergy and detaching a portion of that suffering body from the Protestant cause. The clergyman who is to be honoured by the subaltern commission of leading the apostate churchmen in their diversion in favour of the O'Connell faction, and who is to act in all things of course in obedient subordination to the great chief, is the Dean of Cloyne, who, wise in his generation, thinks it more politie to desert than to uphold the rights of a persecuted Church. The mission which this dignitary of the Protestant Church of Ireland has undertaken is equally honourable and hopeful. Its success, we are per suaded, will be fully commensurate with its merits. That the Roman Catholic faction in Ireland, with so excellent a tactician as Mr. O'Connell at their head, having fully succeeded in overawing and subjugating the British Government, should find among the Pro testant clergy of Ireland, a few individuals ready to accept the rich reward which it is now in their power to present to apostates who will desert the cause of the Church and the law—is precisely what might have been expected. The Dean of Cloyne, and the few clergymen who may join in the declaration which he is about to bring forward, will no doubt share among them the highest preferments that become va cant in the Protestant Church, so long as there is a Protestant Church in Ireland ; and when the Pro testant Church shall no longer exist in that country, the same men will be equally entitled and equally ready to receive such honours and emoluments in the Irish Church as the Vatican will then have to bestow. The course they are about to pursue is the safer, if it be not the more honourable, course. They will acquire by it a strong claim to the powerful patronage of Mr. O'Connell, to the powerful patronage of the Bri tish Administration, to the powerful patronage of the See of Rome. In the present posture and aspect of affairs, these are no slight temptations to apostasy. Yet, notwithstanding the force of these temptations, we are persuaded that the Dean of Cloyne will not find many followers among the Protestant Clergy of Ireland. The Protestant Clergy of Ireland have proved by their conduct that they are an honourable and conscientious body of men, willing rather to suffer persecution in their own persons and families than to betray the rights and principles of the church to which they belong—rights and principles with the support of which they rightly believe that the dearest interests of the community are inseparably connected. A large proportion of this excellent and venerable body have for two years past been deprived of their whole income by lawless violence or unprincipled chicane, carried on under the direct sanction and patronage of the British Government. In these trying_ circum stances they have had the virtue to resist a bribe offered to them by Ministers, for the purpose of inducing them to sacrifice the rights and permanent interests of the Church ; for the. Irish Tithe Bill presented in truth a bribe to the actual incumbents of Ireland, which, by favouring that measure, they might probably have secured. Nor did this measure offer them a bribe of inconsiderable value. It would have given them, at least for a time, in lieu of those rights of property which a lawless faction and a lawless Govern ment had rendered unproductive, a definite and accessible income. But it required on their part the surrender of rights in which individually they had no more than a life interest, and which it was their duty to defend, as the honest trustees of their successors and of the whole Protestant commu nity. It is to the immortal honour of the Irish clergy, that when thus strongly tempted they never hesitated for a moment between their interest and their duty. From them the measure of Church robbery, by which they were to be personally benefitted, never received any sanction, although it is probable that a petition in its favour, signed by any con siderable proportion of the Irish Clergy would have prevented its rejection by the House of Lords. They preferred to suffer in their own persons and families rather than give up the just inheritance of the Church to the enemies of the Church. They feel how deeply the interests of so ciety are concerned in the maintenance of the authority of the law, and they determined not to yield to a mea sure, in favour of which the single argument was, that the law could not be enforced. They are faithful Ministers of the altar, and loyal subjects of the Crown, and they refused to participate in a system of policy which makes ecclesiastical property its spoil, and civil authority its sport. Threatened with star vation, they have braved the threat. Suffering the extremity of distress, they have resolved still to endure, rather than promote a . measure revolting to their sense of honour, their ideas of probity, and their principles of religion. Such are the men among whom the Dean of Cloyne, we are told, is about to hoist the banner of apostacy, and to seek recruits to the cause of illegal and sacrilegious plunder. This new ally of Mr. O'Connell will, we foresee, prove anything rather than an efficient or successful coadjutor.--Morning Post. After an examination of the tissue of error and false reasoning which - the Chancellor wove with such un lucky ingenuity out of the partial evidence of the Poor Law Commissioners, we feel most forcibly the truth of one remark in his speech ;itis as follows Igno rance has no bounds. Unhappily, science has its limits, and they are not hard to reach ; but ignorance is endless, unconfined,inexhaustible. Ever new in in vention, though all its productions are wretched and worthless—always surprising you, though mingling pity and contempt with wonderment ; and never is it more daring in its inroads upon our credulity—never is it more strange in the antic feats it performs— never more curious in the fantastic tricks it plays, than when its gambols are performed in the persons of men dressed in a little brief authority, or who would fain be so attired, and who really are decked habi tually in presumption that almost passes belief." We have never seen a remark so strongly supported by example as in the speech before us. The speaker has hit himself off with singular truth. Perhaps the portrait may be a little strengthened in likeness by substituting quackery for ignorance, though persons acquainted with the furniture of Lord Brougham's mind know that it is like the specimens of an uphol• sterer's show room—some piece of every set, .but no• thing in completeness and arrangement—a lumber o fineries, odds and ends, at once more and less than ne. cessazy to the fitting of any one mansion of the un derstanding. What a heap of confusion and contra diction, over-strained propositions, and conclusions against all experience, is this speech ! At the outset, we are told of evils entailed upon the country by bad laws worse executed, the lawgiver having been out stripped in his pernicious course by the administra tors ; and yet within half-a-dozen pages comes this naive self - contradictio n ;—‘, My Lords, it has been usual to blame the magistrates of the country for the maladministration of these laws. lam not one of those who ever have been able to perceive the justice of this charge. * * 4 The wor s t th at can be said of those respectable persons to whom the country is so greatly in ' debted, and of whose services I should speak more at large if I had not the honour of addressing an assembly al ,most wholly composed of magistrates, is, that in bringing forth by the administration of the Poor Laws, the grievous mischiefs inherent originally in the system, they were not before the age they lived in ; that they were not wi ser t h an a ll who had gone before them, and all who lived around them, and, indeed, all who for one or two generations have come after them. This is the only charge that can 'be justly made against them." Perhaps so ; but in a preceding page the Chancellor had asserted that the magistrates were ‘ e b r eefbefor oret e h age they lived in ;`' or, at lea s t, th at t h ey 1, 4, the Legislature, for he distinctly says that THE SUN, LONDON, TUESDAY, AUGUST 26, 1834 the administrators of the laws have outstripped the lawgiver in his pernicious course (page 4.) This is the charge which the fir s t l aw au th or ity prefers against them, though afterwards he denies its justice. Instead of representing them as merely sharing in the errors of their time, he alleges that they have aggravated the mischief of bad legislation by worse execution, and outrun the law maker in the race of ruin to the coun try I So much for his justice to the magistracy, or the truth of his excuse for them. It is obvious that there must be falsehood on the one side or the other. As to the principle of relief, the benevolent keeper of the King s conscience says, " I do not object to compulsory provision in such cases as I have men tioned, so it be subject to proper regulation, in order to prevent the abuses it is much exposed to." What an indulgent admission ; it makes the speaker a match for that gentle person described by the poet : " Narcissa's temper's tolerably mild, • To make a wash she'd hardly stew a child." He proceeds to argue that the charity is the least safe which affords a constant fund known by the com munity to exist for charitable purposes, contending that " the poor immediately calculate upon it, and be come less provident, forsaking every habit of frugality, taking no care to provide against the ordinary calami ties of life, or the inevitable infirmities of old age ; that they no longer strive for the means of maintaining their children, but heedlessly, recklessly count upon that fund, out of which, whether in sickness or in health, in youth or in age, in impotence or in vigour, they know that they may claim the means of support ; and, setting the pains of labour against those of a scanty sustenance, they prefer idleness and a bare subsistence to plenty earned by toil." This is the true charlatanry, the precise parallel of which will be found in every quack advertisement, in which the utmost possible horrors of the disease are set forth as certain to afflict every patient affected, unless he takes the recommended pill. Lord Brougham, in his quackery, or his ignorance of the human heart, supposes that the conduct of men is determined by one motive; restraining considerations, such as the pride of independence, he leaves entirely out of the account, and talks as if the parish dole was a temptation irre sistible in all conceivable cases. We wonder that, in his observations on dispensaries, he did not contend that the certainty of having medicine gratis, in the event of sickness, must tempt people to make them selves ill ; or that he did not qualify his approval of. hospitals for accidents; by the argument that it encou raged men to carelessness, and that labourers were dis posed to fall from ladders and house-tops, knowing that their broken bones would be set at the expense of the charitable and humane. Seeing the Chancellor's reasoning, that the certainty of any provision has an irresistible tendency to carelessness and idleness, it is amazing to us that he suffers himself to be liable to the pernicious influences of a retiring pension of some thousands a-year. According to his arguments, he should be indifferent to his business, reckless of his duties, inclined to nothing but the folding of hands, and preferring idleness and a bare sufficiency to plenty earned by toil. What a pension is to him, the aid of a parish, or the bounty of an almhouse, is to the poor labourer : but this we know full well, that so long as Lord Brougham is permitted to do work, and to make work, and to meddle with the work of others, he will not touch a stiver of the provision for his days of ease and retirement. In the Bill for the regulation of pen sions, brought in by Ministers last session, and passed by an obsequious House of Commons almost without comment, we find no trace of the principle so elabo rately insisted on by the Chancellor—that to yield a support to idleness is utterly to destroy industry, and to blight all the motives to honest exertion. These men find in their own breasts considerations of pride and honour more than counterbalancing inducements to an endowed repose, which they secure to them selves, without fear of temptation, at the rate of 2,0001. a year after two years' service ; but they can not suppose more than one- motive, and that of the most grovelling kind, in the labouring classes. This is a large error, spread over the whole view of the Poor Law question,, which indeed has been discussed throughout upon partial evidence and ex treme principles. The Chancellor, as every one knows, out Heroded Herod in contending for even more than the present monstrous powers and immuni ties of the Central Board ; but in his speech be charges the French economists with the very error upon which he himself has so preposterously and pertinaciously in sisted in the instance of the new authority. He ob serves—" Every one who knows anything of the French economists, knows full well that they flourished under an absolute despotism,—tl tat they were the great friends and the firm supporters of an absolute monarchy--that they abhorred liberty and abhorred republicanism,—and that one of their errors, in my opinion the most fatal they could commit, was holding the doctrine that what they call despotisme legal, in other words an absolute monarchy, was the best form of government ; accompanying their doctrine, however, with thi s reservat i on —, if you have a good King at the h ea d o f i t ;' as if the sole use of all restraints upon p ower was not , founded on the risk of having bad rulers=-as if the absence of control did not, while man is man, ensure a succession of bad monarchs." Does this principle only apply to Kings ? Are Poor Law Commissioners more than mortal, and. excepted from its scope ? Irresponsibility—power to injure without liability to an action for damages through which the wronged party might have compen sation—this, " while man is man," will ensure reckless and tyrannical authorities, as far as human folly and improvidence can ensure any evil—Tinzes. ATTEMPT AT SWINDLING, ATTENDED WITH FATAL CONSEQENCES. On Monday last, about twelve o'clock, a person habited like a country dealer in cattle, with slouched hat, &c., went to the house of Widow Smith, the sign of the Cock, in Grafton -street, Soho, and complaining of illness, drank several bottles of ginger -bee r . H e t o ld M rs. S m ith that he attended Smithfield mark e t regu l ar l y every Monday morning for the purp ose o f se lli ng catt l e . H e h a d (he said) attended that mo rn i ng , an d h av i ng so ld hi s cattle profitably, was in the possession of a large sum of money, but having been suddenly seized with illness, he had re solved to stop in town, and asked if he could be accommo dated with a room. Having been answered in the affirma tive, he went out, and, as Mrs. Smith supposed, for the purpose of procuring medicine. On his return he had an other bottle of ginger-beer , and was shewn up stairs to a room by Mrs. Smith's sister. He now became considera ably worse, vomited violently, and on getting into bed, placed his small-clothes with scrupulous care under his pil low. Mrs. Smith and her sister - did all for him that hu manity and kindness could suggest, and he frequently thanked them, and at the same time congratulated himself at his happy fate (particularly as he had more than 1501. about him) in falling into the hands of such worthy people. His sickness continued ; and he told Mrs. Smith' s s i s t er , if Mrs. Smith would let him have ten sovereigns, as he had nothing less than a 40/. note amongst his own money, he would send for a doctor, as he could then give him his fee at once. His lady-attendant, however, told him it would be quite time enough to think of that when the medical gentleman came. Mr. Thomas, of Leicester-place, and Mr. Diamond, of King-street, Soho, were accordingly sent for, both of whom were of opinion that it was a case of cholera, and treated it as such with the most unremitting attention. The patient continued alternately better and worse during Monday nighttand Tuesday morning ; and having given Mrs. Smith's sister particular instructions re specting his family—particularly a brother, residing near Oatlands, whom he wished to be sent for—and the disposi tion of his property, in the event of his death, he requested his box to be locked, a piece of paper to be sealed over the key-hole, and the key to be placed on the box,-within his view. This done, he expressed a wish to receive the bene fits resulting from religious consolation : and a clergyman having been sent for, he joined in the most enthusiastic devo tion up to the time of his death, which did not take place until Tuesday night. On the arrival of his brother, who, though poor, is represented to be a most honest and indus trious man (and in respect to him and his family, we for bearcaer to mention his name) , the start lin g trut h broke forth, that the deceased had long been a most aband oned profli iguattoe—effseteotpipiiisn g swi at ndlninog artifice, however and,ever horrible, to use to the em phatic phatic words of his brother , " One who ou g ht to hav e been lothes contained , which he so car efully guarded under the all the small..? hanged years ago !" On exa mination, it turned o ut that wearing apparel, were two duplicates of trivial articles of d in the neighbourhood of St. Mar tin's-lane. n s-lane. The sPupap:7nosietil" is,„„rthtahtehpeuhrpaodsetaokfengeattinqguaind, ti ' tity of some deleterious drugiu. an opportunity re - empathy of Mrs. and exciting the commiseration ann Smith to such a pitch as to induce her to pit 40:entoetn re d uced. tnizzL, soveraigas, and then seeking with them. By taking two large a dose, howe ver , Y°F es°a-112- n being prepared with an antidote, he failed in getting the sovereigns, and forfeited his own life to his wicked designs. The poor brother gave Mrs. Smith two sovereigns (all he possessed) for her trouble and humanity, and the body of the delinquent was interred at the expense of the parish. BANKRUPTCY COURT.—Auo. 25. (Before Mr. Commissioner FANE.) GEORGE SUTTON'S BANKRUPTCY. In this case the bankrupt was a builder, in New -street, Borough-road, and to-day a meeting of his creditors took place, in order to examine him respecting his accounts. Mr. Webb wished to make an application to the Court relating to this bankruptcy, and which was of some con sequence. He appeared on behalf of Mr. Brooks, with whom the bankrupt had made contracts for erecting houses at Herne Bay, and he wished to know if the assignees would give up or complete the contract. Some advances had been made to the bankrupt in part of the completion of the sum of contract, and great injury would arise to the property if some decision was not come to by the assignees. The bankrupt thought the contract being completed would be of advantage to the estate. The Commissioner said it was for the assignees to decide whether they would proceed with the contract. Mr. Webb was of opinion that, under the 76th section of the Bankruptcy Act, Mr. Brooks could compel the as signees to complete the contract under an order from the Court of Review. The Commissioner referred to the Act, and said that the clause related to the completion of land purchases, &c., and not buildings. He considered that as it was necessary to have the houses completed before winter began, that Mr. Brooks, as the owner of the land, should give some compensation to the assignees to give up the contract, otherwise they might hold him at arm's length, and in the interim the weather would destroy the houses. The solicitor said that the assignees were willing to con sider any proposition made by' Mr. Brooks. Mr. Webb stated that Mr. Brooks had not so high an opinion of the contract, and wished the completion of it. It would remain to be seen if the Court of Review would not give an order for the contract to be completed ; if not a bill might be filed in Chancery to ascertain the right of the party. The subject was then dropped, and the proving of the debts proceeded with. The amount of the whole claims against the estate is about 2,100/. The assets amount to very little, the bankrupt stating that his losses have been above 3,000/. The final examination of the bankrupt was then passed ; and further proceedings were adjourned. CORONERS' INQUESTS. Saturday afternoon an inquisition was taken at Giltspur street Compter, before Mr. Payne, touching the death of Francis Daniell Quadry, Esq., aged 54, who died under the following distressing circumstances in the above establish ment :—lt appeared from the evidence that the deceased, who possessed • considerable property, had been making a tour on the Continent for the benefit of his health. He returned to England about a week ago, and on his arrival in town took up his residence at the Bull and Mouth Inn. He reached there on Saturday night, the 16th instant, where, from appearing to labour under mental derange ment, Mr. Sanderson, the respectable proprietor, procured the assistance of the city police officer, No. 50, who took him to the Compter. He there appeared seriously ill, and was attended by Mr. M'Murdock, but died on Friday morning, about five o'clock, from decay of nature brought on by diseased lungs. The deceased was brother to the Rev. John Quadry, a resident Minister at Cork. Mr. Teague, the governor, had the care of the deceased's pro perty. who found 401. besides fifteen sovereigns, in his box. Verdict—" Natural death." An inquest was held last evening before Mr. Baker, the coroner, at the London Hospital, on the body of William Groves, aged 52, who died in that institution early on Sa turday morning last. It appeared that the deceased on Thursday last went into the timber-yard of Messrs. Bell and Riley at Mile-end, where some men were engaged in unloading a waggon of planks. The deceased, who had been drinking, ascended the pile out of bravado to show his dexterity at such work, having formerly been employed on the same premises. He removed about half a dozen planks very properly, but at length, in endeavouring to seize the end of one, he missed his hold, and fell backwards upon the shafts, and from thence to the ground. He was immediately taken to this hospital, but the injury he re ceived by the fall was so serious that he was pronounced incurable, and in fact was then in a dying state although he lingered so many hours aft erwar d s . Verdict " Acci dentaldeath." On Wednesday last a party went from Bognor to Good wood, Sussex, nn a pleasure excursion. Three females in cautiously got into a four-wheel chaise to drive to Moles comb, when the horse ran away with the vehicle, and one of the ladies, named Hunt, the widow of a • missionary, was killed by jumping out. The following evidence was given before J. L. Ellis, Esq., Coroner, at the Duke of Rich mond's Arms, Waterbeach : James Puttock, grocer, at Bognor, stated that the de ceased was his sister. He hired a horse and a four-wheel chaise to go to Goodwood on a party of pleasure ; he was accompanied by his wife, his sister, and the deceased. The horse was a spirited one ; he had some difficulty in keep ing him in ; wanted to keep in company with another chaise, in which were Mr. Briant and his mother ; would kick if whipped. He applied to Mr. Rusbridger, the Duke's steward, for leave to go to Cornice Seat, but a party being previously there, we took some refreshment under the trees, the horse standing by, near Stoney Dill. While smoking their cigars, walked in Stoney Dill for a few mi nutes, and on coming out found that the ladies had taken the chaise to drive to Moldhomb. He was angry that they had gone, fearing some accident, but Mr. Bryant said the horse would go quiet enough as they had no whip. In a short time heard the noise of a carriage, and saw the horse had run away. Made all the haste he could towards Waterbeach-gate, but the horse took the other road. On coming up he found the deceased supported by some per sons who had come to the spot. Mr. Briant, draper, corroborated the evidence of the forme r witness, and stated that he saw the horse running away at full speed, and hastened to their assistance. His mother being in one chaise, he put her out and drove after them. lie came up to the deceased, but finding her taken care of, went after the horse and chaise. He found the front part of it before he came to the Lodge-gate, but the horse was gone through. It was stopped by two men at Woodcote. He strapped the broken chaise to his own, and brought it back to where he had left Mrs. Hunt and Mrs. Puttock. Mrs. Hunt was insensible, and his Grace the Duke of Richmond insisted on sending into Chichester for medical advice. He thought the deceased was only in a fit, and would soon come to. In answer to some ques tions from the Coroner, the witness stated that he took some blame to himself, for Mr. Puttock, who was in Stony Dill when the ladies went away, said he was sure that some accident would happen, and it was always the case when the women would have their own way. He brought the deceased in his chaise to the public-house. This was about four o'clock. W. Grey, Esq., surgeon, of Chichester, stated that a ser vant came from the Duke of Richmond's about a quarter to five o'clock, who stated that he came for him to go to Waterbeach to a lady who had met with an accident in Goodwood Park. He found the deceased on the bed, in sensible, and she died about ten o'clock. On a post mortem examination of the head, he found a fracture of the bone of the skull, and many of the smaller vessels of the brain lace rated, with about four ounces of coagulated blood, either of which was sufficient to have caused death, and he had no doubt the injuries were occasioned by the fall. Medical assistance could have been of no avail. Charles Irish, a carpenter, in the employment of his Grace the Duke of Richmond, stated that he saw the horse running at the utmost speed past the house with two ladies. He did not then see the third, but made a short cut to wards the gate near Mr. Rusbridger's, in the hope of stop ping the horse, but before he got there he heard a scream and the gate rattle, and when he caught sight of them again the horse was going at full speed up tbe hill. He saw the de ceased jump out and fall, and she never moved after. He met one lady who had been thrown out, but who was not hurt. The other lady rode about twenty yards and then jumped out, and did not appear to be hurt He untied the bonnet of the deceased, and Mrs. Rusbridger brought out some hartshorn, &c., but deceased could not take anything. Wh en I came to her I placed her on the bank ; she looked up, but never opened her eyes again. William Parker another servant of his Orace the Duke of Richmond fully corroborated the evidence of the last witness, and stated that he saw the horse run against the gate which it forced open, and that the deceased jumped out as the vehicle was going up the hill, but missing her foot she fell, and never moved after. After some excellent remarks from the Coroner, the Jury returned a verdict of " accidental death," with a deodand of 101. on the horse. The Duke of Richmond was present, and evinced the greatest anxiety : in short, his Grace's attention to the suf ferer and her friends was ,beyond praise. He ordered the lad whom he sent for medical assistance to gallop all the way. A very strange sensation has taken place at Kensington, Notting-hill, and their vicinities, within the last few days, arising out of the following circumstances : It appears that Mrs. Robi nson , th e propr i e t r ess of a se minary for young ladies, at Notting-hill, took under her pro ection a young . female, named Ellen Lawrence, whose pa .- have been in good. circumstances, but latterly much last, the young woman was seized with symptoms of cholera, and notwithstanding the aid of medical advice, died on Friday. Mr. Robinson became alarmed at the infection spreading in his establishment, and among the members of his own family, and immediately took the precaution of adopting measures for the removal of the body, in furtherance of which object the corpse was removed at a late hour on Friday night, by an undertaker, named Symonds, residing at Kensington ; a few hours afterwards, however, two of Mr. Robinson's daughters were taken ill, and the same medical gentleman, Mr. Hora, of Notting-hill, who had attended the deceased, was called in to the young ladies. Mr. Symonds, the undertaker, removed the body of the deceased to his own premises in Church court, Kensington, and very imprudently kept it above ground until Sunday, although Mr. Hora, the surgeon, who attended her, pronounced that her case was one of decided cholera. On Sunday the corpse was removed in a shell to Kensington churchyard. The name of the deceased was not on the coffin, nor bad any clothes been taken from her person. Macklin, the beadle of Kensington parish, being apprised of the circumstance of the deceased's death, and her mysterious removal from the house of Mr. Robinson, interfered in the burial of the body, and apprised Mr. Len don, the curate, of the nature of the case, and who was at the time officiating at some funerals in the churchyard. That gentleman caused information to be given to Mr. Bar low, a magistrate of Kensington, who immediately attended on the spot, and ordered the removal of the body to the bone-house. At the same time the parochial authorities interfered, and gave information to Mr. Stirling, the coroner, and yesterday afternoon an inquest, which lasted some hours, was held at the Crown, High-street, Kensington, on the body of the deceased, Ellen Lawrence, whose age was stated to be 18. The Jury, which was very respectable, suggested whether it was essential to the inquiry that the body of the deceased should be viewed, particularly as she had been dead some days. The Coroner said certainly ; it was the most important part of their duty. This being performed, the evidence was taken, and was as follows : • Mr. George Smith Robinson, of Notting-hill, examined.— Mrs. Robinson has an establishment for young ladies. The deceased was my servant, although treated as one of the family on account of the respectability of her friends. On Friday morning last, the deceased was taken ill, and I sent for Mr. Hora, a surgeon of Notting-hill, who pronounced her to be labouring under a decided case of cholera. I _ _ afterwards sent for Mrs. Lawrence, mother of the deceased, who resided at Hammersmith. The deceased died between 7 and 8 o'clock in the evening. I wished t o remove the body from the house as soon as possible, as I have a large family of children. I applied to Mr. Hora, who recom mended me to Mr. Coulston, an undertaker, to whom I went ; but was informed by that person that he could not provide a coffin that night. I then applied to Mr. Symonds, parish undertaker, who brought a coffin to my house about 12 o'clock at night, accompanied by six men as his assis tants, and the body was removed from the house. By the Jury.—l cannot account for the deceased's name being given as Mary Wheedon. I did not tell Mr. Symonds, the undertaker, that her name was Mary Wheedon. My only motive for removing the body so soon was to prevent infection. The undertaker did not produce any certificate from a clergyman for the burial of the body. After the death of the deceased, two of my daughters were taken dan gerously ill of the same complaint the deceased died of, and are at present under the attendance of Mr. Hora. Mrs. Charlotte Lawrence, mother of the deceased, sworn.—On Friday last Mr. Robinson sent for me at Ham mersmith, my daughter, who resided at his house, having been taken ill suddenly. I immediately went and attended upon my child until her death, which took place about 8 o'clock the same evening. According to the directions of Mr. Horn, the surgeon, I applied hot blankets to her body, as also hot bottles to her feet. Every attention was paid the deceased. By the Jury—The clothes of the deceased were not re moved off her person. There was much alarm in Mr. Robinson's family respecting the death of the deceased. Mr. Robinson wished her to be removed from the house, but Mr. Hora, the surgeon, objected to that as a dangerous expedient.. Mr. James Hora, surgeon, of Nottin g -bill, sa id—l at tended the deceased on Friday last ; her case was one of decided cholera ; I had no hope of her surviving from the beginning. She died about 8 o'clock on Friday evening. By the Jury—Mr. Robinson suggested the necessity of removing the deceased from the house when I was first called in, but I objected to such, on account of the danger that would attend such a removal. Mary Slade, a matron of Kensington workhouse, said that she had examined the body of the deceased, and there were no marks of violence on it. Mr. Symonds, the undertaker, said that he had acted under the directions of Mr. Robinson, and had no intention of privately burying the body. The CORONER observed, that the whole case arose from the wish of Mr. Robinson in removing the body of the deceased out of his own house for the prevention of infec tion, and to save his family from illness. The Jury, under all the circumstances, returned a verdict, " That the deceased died by the visitation of God." The inquest was not over until half-past 10 o'clock. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS, AUG. 25. (Concluded from our Paper of yesterday.) After the Learned Gentleman, Mr. ADOLPHUS, had stated the nature of the indictment, the following witnesses were examined : William Hingston, auctioneer and appraiser, carrying on business in Pratt-street, Camden -town, deposed that the defendant rented a house of him in College-street, West. The neighbourhood complained of the conduct of the de fendant, and of the unwholesome vapours which were emitted from the house. Hingston had six houses in that street, and he had lost tenants and lodgers on account of the nuisance. The defendant through the night made noises as if he was beating the wall with a heavy metal in strument ; the sounds were at times like a pestle and mor tar, and at others like a gong. Witness had received more than one notice, one from Mr. Starling, an attorney's clerk. Witness had brought an action of ejectment against the de fendant, but it failed in consequence of informality. Mr. PAYNE cross-examined the witness, to show that the defendant had offered to leave the premises and make good any dilapidation. The prosecutor stated, that when impri soned on a former occasion, the defendant had sent for him to make such an arrangement, but he laughed at witness. William John Starling, an attorney's clerk, residing next door to the defendant, stated the nature of the nuisance committed by the defendant. He lived alone, and in the day time was generally quiet, but at night he was always at work, or making a loud noise, as if beating metal ; he also swore dreadfully, sometimes at his dog and sometimes at himself. On the night of the 4th of May the wife of wit ness was confined ; that was about 10 o'clock, and the defendant, when his wife groaned from the pain, imitated her, and so continued and made noises until .5 o'clock the next morning. The effluvia and stench were excessively offensive. The defendant occasionally came home in a cab with a quantity of metal, and refused to pay the driver. Mobs would often be collected in consequence. Witness had remonstrated with him, and once or twice he had de sisted from continuing the nuisance, but subsequently he had repeated it with increased violence. Mr. Stamford, a commissioner under the Local Paving Act, deposed that he resided in College-street, on the oppo site side from the defendant, four houses off. Witness had been repeatedly awakened by the noises made by the defendant at midnight. Mr. Hudson, residing at No. 40 in the same street, con firmed the preceding evidence, and added that he saw the defendant at times " without any back part." Two policemen (54 and 180), of the division S, stated that the defendant was an annoyance to the neighbourhood, and that they had been repeatedly applied to repress the disturbance. They expostulated with the defendant, but their remonstrances were useless. On Sunday night, the 4th of May, when Mrs. Starling was confined, the language of the defendant was most dreadful, and he mocked the groans of the lady. Several other neighbours deposed to the same facts. Mr. PAYNE addressed the jury for the defence, urging that the defendant had only fairly continued and carried on a noisy trade. As to the charge that he had mocked the groans of a lady in labour, he hoped for the sake of human nature that it was not the fact, and he did think the witnesses were utterly mistaken on that point. The de fendant had carried on business in the neighbourhood for. 14 years. The plain fact was, the prosecution had been got up, not for the public good, but for the purpose of ejecting the defendant from the house. That proceeding was sought to be attained by a criminal charge, instead of by a civil action. The CHAIRMAN here suggested to Mr. Payne that it would be well if the defendant to avoid punishment would give up the house and cease the nuisance. Mr. PAYNE said he had advised that course, but it was rejected. 4 The CHAIRMAN summed up, stating the law of the case, and the jury pronounced a verdict of Guilty. The CHAIRMAN said he was sorry the prisoner had been so ill advised as to persist in the course he had taken, for an offence which by the manner in which it was persisted in was clearly illegal. Mr. ADOLPHUS said that the prisoner had been tried at a former session on a similar charge, and sentenced to im prisonment. He had then said he would as soon give up his life as the house. He was incorrigible. The CHAIRMAN again advised the prisoner to give up the house, and not to subject himself to the heavy punish ment which would await his obstinacy. Prisoner—l will not surrender or go out until ejected ,by legal means, Perhaps, however, you will allow judgment to be respited to the next session, and in the meantime I can abate the nuisance. CHAIRMA N.—Certaisly not ; you have had a very fair offer. The sentence the Court is, that you be impri' soned twelve months in the House of Correction, and the you pay a fine of 251. to the King ; and further, that at tl!e expiration of th e t erm you enter into sureties , yourself lo 201. and two sureties in 10/. each, for your future go od be " haviour, and th a t y ou rema i n i n con finement until such fin ° be paid and bail entered into, IN THE MATTER OF ABRAHAM BELASCO. Mr. PRENDERGAST applied that the recognizance Tnr: be respited to the next sess i ons . He had an affidavit Mai notice had been served on the parish. I a d- Mr. ADOLPIIUS, for the prosecution, said that lie mitted notice had been served, but it would not be coo - sented to ; still, however, he would not oppose the aPP cation. The Court respited the recognizances to the next sessio!: Mr. ADOLPHUS said the defendant must come into our' - _ MURDER OF A SUPPOSED WITCH• In March last, Annette Rumillier, a young virom all '4 years of age, living at Vergnoz, in the Isere, was at tack with a nervous complaint, which she attributed to a b e ge woman, named Modion, nearly 80 years old, who passe cil : the village for a witch. Her family and the neigh uL° "‘ , o were convinced that it was she who had cast a spell 01 7 ?„ the young girl. The relations of Annette took her to to; house of Modion several times, but never found her home, she being usually out seeking alms from door._'d door. In a neighbouring hamlet lived Brochet, a repal a e i. sorcerer, and to him the family had recourse for the V. ing of Annette. Brochet listened to their tale, and g h °l tie up stairs, uttered, after a loud noise, these Prq -e OO words :—"'Tis an old woman who has cast a spell IT it your daughter. It will be difficult to get rid of it. If were a man, there would be less difficulty, for then it Dug an be made to pass to a cat or a d og ; b u t a s it is a girls i t c o only be given to another girl: , The n ex t day the sorce ci r a went to Rumillier's. He muttered some prayers, diPP e little ivory saint into the wa t er , and directed the fan% to light a large fire the next day, to give to the water, in which the soles of old shoes had been boiled , ° i d to place a chair near the fire, adding, that whoever slibt first sit down on the chair was the person that had l ' e ; witched the girl, and that the only means of c uring b e was to heat that person well, and even give her a beaten These directions were executed the next morning, an" - 0 so happened that the widow Modion came in, and sat dow by the fire. Rumillier and his son, obeying the ins tr l tions of Brochet, seized her and heated her g irl sonl a well, an finding the patient grew no better, the son kicked her 4 : 1 1 03 of the house, and beat her severely with a stick. a , poor woman was afterwards found at the bottom of 3 t he vine, called the Grande Combe, 25 or 30 feet deep ' was taken up, covered with blood, and carried to a n ei g bouring stable. The next day, her children went to er vey her home, but she expired before she reached it. milliet, his son, and the sorcerer Brochet, were in Co sequence arraigned, a few days ago, before the Cn, r , of Assizes at Grenoble, on the c h arg e of rau r ' e k e ing the widow M o di on . S evera l w it n esses W e d to the violence of the b e ati ng g i ven t o the clee eas en by Rumillier, junior ; and one deposed to having s e o f her thrown down the Grande Combe by two men, on e a whom was the same p r i soner . Oth er witnesses declarer that they heard the deceased s t a t e th a t th e au thor of t he sufferings was the so n , R um illi er . I n th e co urse of , t he evidence it appeared that th e w h o l e v ill age r egarded death of this poor creature as a bl ess i ng o f Providence, ans that the Mayor of Vergnoz so fully believed she Wa h . witch, that he refused to make mi nu t es o f h er v i o lent dca t io Against Rumillier senior no cha rge was es t a blished. I he son, in his recital of the affair, evidently showed that,. I l acted under the influence of brotherly affection, and i n 1 %. persuasion of his sister being bewitch e d by the dec e l e hie Brochet betrayed also deep c o n v i c ti on o f th e efficacy the curative means, and pretended that he only prescribed hatto and prayers. The counsel fo r th e p r i soners arg ued murder had not been proved, an d ca ll e d u p on the Cou rt . 0 , give to that part of the cou n t r y th e bl essings o f edueat:°o and not the severity of a sent ence . Th e J ur y brough t f o r verdict of Not Guilty in favou r of R um illi er senior, 43 " c o Guilty of wounds and br u i s e s on ly aga i ns t the other tsta prisoners, upon which Rumilli er j un i or was sentence d two years', and Brochet - to 13 months' imprisonm ent ' French Paper. that to SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. VESSELS ENTERED INWARDS AT TIE CUSTOM-ROUSE, Sir Edward Banks, Norwood, Rotterdam, Cust° ll " - iior' Bie ; Hope, Moryson, St. Petersburg, Church Hole C oe; man ; Neptune, Longuh ar t, Ch er b our g, B rewe r's-quaY- - Rio; Jonge Joanna, Rieke, Antwerp, Cherry-gardens—D e w Do- Sea Flower, Holt, Guernsey, ditto—Cooper; Ranger W , arne r ' naldson, Rio Janeiro, London Dock ; Sovereign, r „ii e n- Guernsey, Regent's Canal—Cooper ; C ec ili a , Bay, "-Attar borg, Litnehouse—Di c k ; M ar i a , H aw k6 s, Aalborg, —do ditto • Alexander, Mu rra y, M a d e i ra an d J ama i ca, West In 1 . Dock—Dawn ; Lyra, H en d erson , Ch arente , di tto —See:o: Henry Davidson, Willi ams , J ama i ca , ditt o —G e dd e s ; „7, 3 e, Cowie, Archan ge l, R egen t' s C ana l—M‘Ghi e ; Schube, Memel, West India Dock—Sack ; Mary Ann, Cape of Good Hop e , St. K a th ar i ne ' s D oc k—H o lster ; ri v it. Mayer, Aarkhus, Limehouse—Drolenvaux ; Prosperity,rclo keshly, Archangel, B rown ' s Q ua y—Vertue ; Ganges , 6 , 1 ern' Pictou, Blackwall—Seldon ; Good Intent, Domville, sev, Regent's Canal—Brown ; Mary Ann, Tredger, dot r; Alderman's Quay—M anue l ; Flower, Carter, ditto , ' be ; King George, M'Farlin, dtto, Regent's Canal—pr o p; Calypso, Wilkinson, J ama i ca , L on d on Dock—Wil lui Vis• Mediterranean, Allegre, Nantes, City Canal—Cooper; go- Inglis, Laybourne, Smyrna, London Dock—Hodgson„; o , garet Richardson, Thomas, T r i n id a d, St. K a th ar ine's v i/ c i , Cook; Branken Moor, Cearby, M aur iti us , W es t India Dot. Wilkinson Wilkinson ; George the Thi r d, W a t er h ouse , J am aica, ("fr o st Geddes ; Lord Wellington, Wylam, St. Andrew's, e bec Country Dock—Jackson ; George Palmer, Wakes, l o th and Montreal, Commercial Dock—Brown; Japan, Maya lk i e cio , Seas, East London D oc k—C annon ; H otspur , Stor, 'j o s, London Dock—Wilki nson ; R ose ll e , Davidson, Bareceooo4 Fresh Wharf—B arr y ; P eru , G ra h am , C ey l on , C a pe °' re reo , Hope, and St. Helena, London Docks--Gooch ; Zilis. Thompson, Antigua and B er bi ce , W est I n di a D oc k9-- - m ENTERED OUTWARDS FOR LOADING, AUG. 2 5 ' #O, Ann White, Gader, 160 tons; Lord Strangford , 1 1 1 001 Hamburg, 164 ; C a t er , Whit na ll, D un ki r k , 34 ; Strataig; Sanford, Trinidad, 332 ; Columbine, Corbin, Hamburg . ' Escape, Pope, Dunkirk and Bologna, 58. CLEARED OUTWARDS WITH CARGOES, Aua. 2 5 . A O- Wesleys, Tindale, Petersburg; Ramona, Stranaap werp ; Johanna, Walter, Grufswold ; Ludd, Jackson; wiry werp ; Nelly, Best, ditt o ; A nn , D ry b oroug h, O po rto ; Yor k; Jackman, Memel ; Samuel Robertson, Griswold, New„ fo rrik Maria, M'Lachlen, St. S e b ast i an; L aw O g ilby, Gulucz ; Cato, Whitnall, Dunkirk. CLEARED OUTWARDS IN BALLAST, Au.. 25 ' _Jell' Useful, Ederson, P e t ers b urg , 227 t ons ; S we y Ge1n . , 24; Hansen, Denmark, 48 ; Cecrops, Finlayson, Quebec , o s l' Acomb, Lanchester, Cronstadt, 172; Oxenburg, Rus e )firr tic, 109 ; Dido, Ostman, ditto, 70 ; Ocean, Norwiek, hero, michi. 278 ; Friends, Man n i ng , H ar li ngen, 130 ; N°r-t 55; Charrow, ditto, 115 ; Vrow Dernika, Bonkurn, Vier Gebroders, Folckham, ditto, 59. " 111 ILLUSTRATIONS OF H UMBUG ,— Dinni , . country inn, where you ge t " anyt hi ng you p l ease to e'ellt most of the plate on mo s t t a bl es, h op i ng " a ll friends *r e cso regretting that you " canno t h ave t h e p l easure, " every e l 0 9 ' of "I am shocked," th e greater num b er o f f a i nts , se' kgee and inextinguishable fit s o f l aug ht er, an d g i v i ng champ or for economy's sake, are a ll—h um b ug. Y ours trulY' fad very truly, yours most truly, yours sincerely, you r ; veil sincerely, yours most sincerely, yours faithfully, r u t eft faithfully, yours most f a ithf u ll y, your o b e di ent serva,%toref obliged and obedient serv an t, are a ll — h um b ug. " $ 11 " ,, in nine cases out of ten, " my dear Sir," almost alwaY'' otr satisfaction which a gentleman has a right to expect,',', B :l l o:, resting swindler, and a r oman ti c b at hi ng- b ox, are a" then ' bug. " Sweet little dear, the image of its f a ther or Ol d er infant prodigies in general, "excessively sultry, but e u t t 7 ably cool in the sh a d e ," " most positively the last ;e piece of painful interest," and " the modern Roscius, —humbug. —D üblin University Magazine. BIRTIES. o hter . On the 23d inst., at Scarborough, Lady Blackett, of a (lau , r -fht er. , On the 21 s t i nst . , at T angmere, Mrs. R. Tredcroft, o f a (1 clu o On the 23d i ns t., i n R usse ll. square, t h e w if e o f Hassa n Dodgson, Esq., of a son. MARRIED. of P' f fi l 4 : On the 11th inst., at P u t ne y, S wyn f en Jervis, EsViritoe:f",l;,f ston, Staffordshire, to An n ie, d aug ht er o f th e l a t e H. On the 23d inst., at Holywell, Henry Champion Par tr isq.,, i t of the Inner Temple, e ld es t son o f H enry P ar tridge , elos i i, Hookham Hall, county of N or f o lk, t o Eth e ld re d Frar;11' 0 1yo l daughter of Lieutenant-General Birch Reynardson, of eidg Lincolnshire. Nichols fillavr On the 24th inst., at St. Mary' s , N ew i ng t on , Nic. -- to i.'" o• Lash, Esq., of his Majesty's st eam f r i ga t e S a /aniander , of St . A beth, second daughter of Caleb M. Littlejohn, Esq. , /luny drew's, Jamaica , „ of -", t he On the 19th inst., at Cheltenham, James Horne, ." 4, 7,ter 04 berland-street, Portman-square, to Louisa, eldest daug' late Charles Whalley, Esq., of Calcutta. . il es , . o n Ta r ,7o, On the 25th inst., at 810u DIE D nt's Court, near Hen le y D 5 lO B oin his 34th year, th e Ri g ht H on . Ch ar l es Viscount the R eldest son of the Earl of Cork and Orrery. c i t ti.e or On the 21st inst., at Herring Court, Richmon d, t. Clarinda Anna Margaret Plunkett, the infant daughter of t : e asogoc Hon. Lord Louth. 'deo— `) iln the 23d inst., at Red Hill, Surrey, Mary Ann e ' e m . c e ter of the late Anthony Cardon, Esc . th-' s "' - WeY Ol " On the 24th inst., William Say, E s q., of t Kept, Portland-place. On the 16th inst., James Taggart, Esq., rhis chl s in h s 86th year. the '-'- On the 25th inst., Mr. Robert Joseph Hixon, of aged 68. of Chiolhur. , 6 1.033;d012 Printed and Published by IVIVItDO at Tlia Sun OfELei, No. 112, Strand. T= "PI Is i n a me de n i Son Pere, 'ltarr larg, fr o , th e ttan, T ha s a well ; to er, ST.I of p ; h eret nr c. Pi eiou s the RiT en jn SatUrd v"OSI' 1. 'Pc:tf.l4l At c o for the tth e Th e r r eceive , . A T4O4 t ' i but e t) , soco C44 art . :