The Sun. — London, England, 1831-06-28 00:00:00

tei fere at once, he should feel it his bounden duty to bring the subject before the House. Lotd IIOWICK said, that the petition from Newfound land had attracted the most attentive consideration of hi-, Alajesty's Government. It was the full persuasion of the Government that that country had made of late such progress in civilization, that the inhabitants of it ought to have a more direct controul over its own internal affairs than they had heretofore had. At the same time there seemed to be a great difficulty in the way of grant ing to it a separate legislation, because there was no town, save St. John's, which was of any particular size, in the country. The other towns were small and widely separated from each other, so that the legislation would have to I e granted to St John's, if granted at all. Go vernment hoped that other means would be found of giving to the inhabitants of 'Newfoundland a power of interfer ence in their nwn affairs. With respect to affording pro. t action to the English fishery on the French shores, that was a point disputed by the French ; for the treaty of 1823, and the subsequent result of an application to the French Government on the question, left it extremely doubtful; what would be the ultimate decision it was im possible for the Noble Lord to say. As to the third ques tion there was no intention whatever on the part of Go vernment to bring forward any Act of Parliament for the present. Mr. ROBINSON then gave notice that on Tuesday, the 25th of July, he should move an address to the Crown on the state of Newfoundland. IMPORTATION OF GLOVES. Mr. ROBINSON moved for a return of the number of dozens pairs of gloves that had bum imported into this c ountry since April, 1830, to April, 1831, and the amount of the duty paid thereon. REFORM MEASURE. Mr. C. DOUGLAS presented a petition from certain land-owners in the county of Forfar, in Scotland, against certain parts of the proposed measure of Reform, parti cularly complaining of the ten pound elective franchise. Mr. MAULE undertook to declare to the House that this was not to be considered as the petition of the land owners in general of the county of Forfar. By far the greater majority of the inhabitants and land owners there were decidedly in favour of the measure. As for himself be felt extremely grateful to his Majesty's Government for bringing forward the Reform measure again, and so soon after the meeting of Parliament, and it should have his most cordial support.---(Cheers.) Captain ROSS had not the slightest difficulty in as suring the House, that 99 out of every 100 of the inhabi tants of the eounty of Forfar were decidedly in favour of the present measure of Reform. Mr. C. DOUGLAS, in moving that the petition be printed, said that he had not presented it as the petition of the landowners of the county, but only as the petition of the under-mentioned respectable inhabitants. RIOTS IN SCOTLAND. Mr. DUND AS wished to ask the Lord Advocate of Scotland whether any measures bad been taken to bring those who had assembled and committed riots at the late elections in Scotland to punishment? The LORD ADVOCATE said he had not the least objection, in answer, to say that one individual at Lanark, and certain individuals at various other parts, were under prosecution at this moment for the part they had taken in those riots. At Ayr, a very formidab'e riot had taken place, but hitherto no rioter, he regretted to say, had been identified, though every investigation had taken place. Mr. KENNEDY said, that with reference to the dispo sition of the people of Scotland, nothing could be more sound— l ie meant the disposition of the intelligent and re spectable class of persons throughout that country. No doubt, as in all countries, there might be a few evil-disposed persons who might be ready to create and to join in a riot ; but the disposition of the people there generally was of the most sound description, and nothing could be more libellous or false than to state, as had been alleged in another place, that they only desired to have a leader to destroy the established institutions of the country. He himself knew much of their disposition, and whenever occasion presented be should be ready to give in proof to that House what he did know on the IBkii , ject. Sir WM. RAE complained that he had been misre presented in what he had stated respecting the Scotch a few nights ago. He had upon that occasion been re presented to have said, that a body of Scotchmen could never meet and separate themselves again, without bloodshed.—(Laughter.) Such an expression had never escaped his lips. What he had said, and was ready to re peat, was, that though it was exceedingly difficult to rouse a body of Scotchmen, yet that when they were excited it was by no means easy to allay that excitement. He be lieved that the Learned Lord Advocate opposite could have no difficulty in bearing out the truth of this state ment, recollecting that he himself, when he was the unpopular candidate at Forfar, was obliged to send thirty miles for troops to put down the rioters. An HoN. 111zataart, whose name we could not obtain, defended the conduct of the Scotch. Mr. CHARLES ADAM spoke on the same aide. Sir GEORGE CLERK considered that wherever good order had been maintained at the late elections, it had been owing to the proper conduct of the Sheriffs.— He considered that Scotland, previous to the introduction of the Reform measure, was one of the most peaceable pints of his INlijesty's dominions, but that since the bringing forward of that measure, all the troops in Scotland had not been able to maintain order and peace ; and he was persuaded that the excitement, and consequences of that excitement, was by no means yet at an end on the other side of the Tweed. Mr. FERGUSON would make one observation respect• in those riots that had existed in Scotland, and which had existed to a considerable extent, not, certainly, to the eiedit of those concerned in them. His decided opinion was that if inquiries were nioat scrupulously made, not ore of those persons to whom the elective franchise was to be extended would be found among those who were concerned in such tamults from the one end of Scot land to the other.—(Loud cheers.) There could not be a more loyal, a more moral, a more peaceable population than that of Scotland.—(Hear.) It was the opposition to Reform that had caused the exeitement—(lfear)—and he believed that the riots which had existed in that part of the country, bad been occasioned by the oppositionists to the Reform Bill. He was far from justifying such riots, but be would not let it be said in that House that his Majesty's Government or those friendly to their grand measure were either the remote causes of their ex istence, or at all accessary to them in any shape. An HoN. Maataza bore testimony to the outrages coma witted by the populace against the unpopular candidates. The LORD ADVOCATE bad issued a proclamation, in consequence of a communication lie had bad from the Sheriff of Haddington, declaring that the proceedings of the Magistrates had his sanction, and that he would have the guilty brought to condign punishment. He bad been anxious that all legal measures should be taken to keep the peace. A MEMBER, whose name could not be learnt from the messengers of the House, bore testimony to the violence that had accompanied many of the recent elections in Scotland, but denied that from the popular vehemence any inference could be drawn that the people were favourable to Reform. He called upon Ministers to look at the whole of the provincial Press in Scotland, and learn from thence whether the people of that country were in favour of the 11111. Mr. DIXON gave the most unqualified contradiction to whit had been said by the Hon. Baronet on the floor (Sir George Clerk). Ile had seen a procession ;n Glasgow of 40,000 persons in favour of Reform, and not a single in stance of tumult had occurred, and women and children had met it in the streets without stay apprehension or in convenience. If the whole city of Glasgow were polled mat, he was convinced that out of its 200,000 inhabitants 199,000 would he in favour of his Majesty's Ministers. Mr. CAMPBELL said, that although a few persons might have acted infamously in Lanark, yet the accounts of what had taken place there were grossly and shame fully exaggerated. He had seen 200 troops charge through a mob o f people, and the m i l i tary h a d b een ca ll e d in most unnecessarily, fur out of the 300 special con stables, not one had been maltreated, or had lost a single staff. 31r. FERGUSSON eipl • n After a few words from- r. ed l3 ouCLi s , the petition was ordered to be printed. COMMITTEE OF SUPPLY. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the Order of the Day that the House do resolve itself into a Committee of Supply. The Marquis of CHANDOS addressed the Treasury bench across the t a ble of the House on the the sub j ecte o tl'ur y prosecutions against Mr. O'Connell, but in so low a tone as to he but indistinctly heard for same time. We under stood the Noble Marquis to say, that when he had put a question to his Mijesty's Ministers respecting their inten tions on the subject of the prosecutions against the lion. Member for Kerry, he had felt himself perfectly satisfied with the answer which he had received from the Irish Secretary ; but the course which Ministers had rustled since the dissolution of Parliament had by no means ac corded with what the Right lion. Secretary had said in reply to his question. He now rose to know whether his Majesty's Ministers would have:any objection to lay vn tlble of the House the correspondence which bad taken place between them and their legal advisers on the question. Mr. STANLEY had already stated fully and clearly the grounds upon which the Hon. Member for Kerry had not been brought up for judgment. If he were disposed to enter into a quibble with the Noble Marquis, he should say that the law had been allowed to take its course. If, on any future occasion, the Noble Marquis should think proper to bring forward a motion on the subject, he should be prepared to meet it. ,Mr. O'CONNELL said, that if such a motion were made, he would he the first man in that House to second it., The proceedings had taken place upon a statute which no Minister would dare to apply to England,—a statute which gave to one man the arbitrary power of deciding what were public meetings and what were not. This had very truly been called an Algerine Act. The statute had expired, and the malignity of certain persons had been dis appointed in not seeing brought up for judgment the man whom they knew not to have committed any offence. Mr. LEFROY slid, that if the prosecution of the Hon. Member had not bee❑ carried on, no man could say what would have taken place in Ireland, such had been the nature of the offence. Mr. O'CONNELL complained that the Hon. and Learned Member had made use of an expression which no lawyer ought to use. He denied that he had committed any offence, except under the particular statute, and he de fied the lion. Member to volunteer any prosecution of the sort under any other law. Sir CHARLES WETHERELL said, that the Hon. Member for Kerry had declared that no lawyer would pro nonnce his conduct a legal offence, or volunteer a prosecu- ion. Now he (Sir C. Wetherell) was a Limier, and would— Mr. O'CONNELL—I said, " independent of that one statute." Sir CHARLES WETHERELL—Oh, that then is a drawback on the whole proposition ; it lowered the pro position 100 per cent. Had not the Noble Lord at the head of the Government declared that he would take care that the law was carried into effect, and had not the Noble Lord at the head of the Exchequer said, that sooner than the prosecution should be stopped, he would incur even a civil war ?—(Cries of " Oh, oh," and " No no," from all parts of the House.) Well, then, the Noble Chancellor of the Exchequer had said, that he would brave a civil war sooner than consent to a repeal of the Union,—was not that the Noble Lord's declaration ? Well, and was not the repeal of the Union one of the prominent topics of the public speeches of the Hon. Member for Kerry? lie got up to say that he applauded the Noble Lord for his decla ration. They had, to be sure, an aristocracy yet in being, to which the Noble Head of the Government, and the Noble Chancellor of the Exchequer, and some few others of his colleagues belonged ; but he did not know, and would not take it upon him to'say, how long, under the presentsystem of revolution in which those noble personages more or less assisted—how long that aristocracy would be permitted to exist.—(" Hear," from the Opposition.) Why (he would again ask) did the Government abandon prosecutions to which they were in policy, honour, and consistency pledged ? It was no excuse to say that the stat u`e under which they bad proceeded as far as they did had expired, for, if necessary to their purpose, why nut get it renewed, were it only for one year? The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER felt it right to say one word in explanation of what had falle❑ from the Hon. and Learned Gentleman. It was true that he had made use of strong language in the last Session with reference to the state of Ireland—that he had stated that he was satisfied in his own mind that the repeal of the Union with that country, then much agitated, would lead to the dismemberment of the empire; and that there fote, sooner than that dismemberment should take place, he should prefer the hazard of a civil war.—(Hear.) That was what he did say, and would repeat.—(Hear, hear.) But he had never said—as the Hon. and Leaned Gentle man would insinuate—that lie would prefer civil war to foregoing the prosecutions then pending, or any prosecu tions whatever--(Hear)—for he never, for one moment, could harbour such a monstrous proposition.—(Cheers.) Arr. PERRIN (as we understood) contended that, as the statute to which the Hon. and Learned Gentleman referred had originated with his own party, and not with the present Government or its supporters, Ministers were not called upon to propose its renewal.—(llear.) Sir E. SUGDEN was one of those who had voted for the Act, because convinced of its expediency, without re ference to any other measure, and was prepared to vindi • cate the grounds on which he had given his vote. Its odium, if there was any, was fairly imputable to the House at large. The discussion here dropped. Captain BOLDERO was anxious to obtain some infor mation from the Right Hon. the First Lord of the Ad- roiralty on a matter, us it appeared to him, of great public importance. He bad just come up to town from Ports mouth, where be bad seen a very large fleet—(A laugh)-- and he was anxious to know from the proper quarter for what that fleet was thus collected.—(Great laughter.) lie really saw nothing laughable in the matter, and was sur prised that a question of great public interest, not only in a financial point of view, but as it bore upon the internal and external relations of the country, should he attempted to be got rid of in this way, with such unbecoming levity. It was the largest fleet that had been collected at Ports mouth for the last 16 years, and evidently could only have been collected at great expense to the country. He wished to know what was its obj.ct ? Sir J. GRAHAM, in answering the Hon. Member begged to say, first, that the fleet to which he alluded was not assembled for the purpose of hostile aggression upon any foreign power ; and, secondly, wss not assembled for the mere purpose of experiments in naval science. The fact was, that the necessary ev,lutioas in naval warfare re quired a considerable deal of preliminary practice, and all that was intended by the assembling of the {bet at S h ithead was to take advantage of the summer months in practiming those evolutions.—(Hear.) In answer to a question of an Hon. Member, Lord HOWICK stated, that it was not the intention of Ministers to propose in the present session any compulsory regulations with respect to the manumission of slaves in the Colonies. ORDNANCE ESTIMATES. The House having gone into a Committee of Supply, Mr. TENNYSON brought forward the Ordnance Esti mates. The Hon. Member said, that as he expected no opposition to the grants, they being in fact merely the complement of the year, which had not Leen provided for, owing to the late dissolution of Parliament, he would not enter into any statement ❑ow of their details, but he was ready at the same time to afford any information that might b e required. After a few words from Mr. HumE, the several Esti mates were put seriatim, and agreed to without any oppo sition. Mr. HUME wished to know, before the Chairman left the chair, from the Hon. Gentleman, whether the regu lation which he had himself stated last Session with re spect to the filling up of vacancies in the Ordnance-office had been adhered to; he meant, whether half-pay officers had been called ❑pon to till such vacancies as might have occut red in that department, to which they were com petent ? Mr. TENNYSON was happy to state, in answer to his Hon. Friend, that the present Master-General of the Ordnance had since his accession to office rigidly adlieted to that regulation—(Hear, hear)—and that further im provements, by which a considerable saving would accrue to the public, were in contemplation. Sir H. HARDINGE was apprehensive lest it should be inferred, from the tone of the statement just made, out of doors that the late Board of Ordnance presented an un favourable contrast to its present successor, so far as eco nomy and an efficient discharge of duty was concerned. He, therefore, begged the Hon. Gentleman to state whe ther any, and what, difference with respect to the ap pointment of half-pay officers to va'•ant situations in the Ordnance existed between tke present and the late Board of Ordnance ? Mr. TENNYSON and Colonel MABERLY both stated that they were willing to bear their testimony to the effi ciency and economy of the management of the late Board of Ordnance.—( Hear.) Sir H. HARDINGE felt thankful for such a candid admission. Alter a few words from Messrs. Hurt and [luau, the grant was agreed to. NAVY ESTIMATES. _ _ . Sir .1. GRAHAM then moved the Navy Estimates. The Committee would observe, that those estimates were precisely identical with those presented to the former [louse of Commons. The Committee would likewise see that the balance-sheet had been brought forward from the Ist of J a n uary to th e I s t o f April. He then moved— " That a force of 32,000 men, including 10,000 for the Royal Marine Service, be voted for the Service of the year 1831." Sir G. CLERK did not wish to urge any objection to the present vote, but he could not help observing that the amount of the force was nominally the same, whereas there was, in point of fact, a great practical incretse. The force that heretofore protected the revenue along the coasts of Kent and Sussex hod been transferred from the Navy Ditimates to the Customs' Department. Since February, it must be known to the House, that the expence of maia ben transferred a e tthwstherelwr b t e h en e B err o , ar o d vd o l etatiinstionnig s. it 11,fo,aresesahiiinith savitag of 70,000/. a year. Fie really believed that upon a trial of the experiment it would turn out that the change as far from being a saving, would be a loss to the country. The Board of Customs were saddled with au expense of from 140,0001. to 1130,000/. without any corresponding benefit. He then proceeded to notice the discharge of the coast blockade, and pressed upon the attention of the Committee the injudiciousness of that step at a moment when we had such a squadron afloat as that now at Spit_ head, and at a time when there was such a want of sea men. Recurring to the change made in the Preventive Service, he would repeat that he thought it would be productive of serious mischief, and that before the winter passed over. Sir JAMES GRA HAM said that the subject just re ferred to divided itself into two parts—the fiscal question, namely, whether the present or the former coast guard was likely to prove more efficient ; and the naval ques tion. As to the fiscal matter, the question was, whether the trade was now better protected under the Board of Customs than it had been by the former coast guard. New lie had the authority (if the Chairman of the Board of Customs for saying th•tt the duty was as efficiently per formed as ever ; and that a saving of at least seventy thou sand pounds could be demonstrated. It had bee❑ said, that in giving up the old preventive service the country had lost a valuable force. That was altogether a mistake, for a large proportion of them were lendstnen, and could not be transferred to the service of the navy : for out of two thousand four hundred, not above eight hundred were found eligible. There had been altogether a reduction of one thousand men, and there would speedily be a further reduction of a first-rate ship of war ; and the _Britannia, a 7-4-gun ship, which, with the one thousand inen he hail already mentioned, would operate a reduction to the full extent of the coast guard. Mr. LEADER complained that there were no Govern ment dock-yards in Ireland—that there was merely a mi litary possession of Ireland—a possession that cost this country since the Union 93,000,000/. The vote was then agreed to. On the question that a sum of 49,299/. 2s. 7d. be granted for the contingent expenses of the Navy-office, Mr. HUME inquired if there were any intention of consolidating the Navy-office with the Navy Pay-office? Lord ALT HORP said it was in contemplation, and no pains would be spared to forward its accomplishment. On the question that a sum of 810,0001. be granted fur timber and other materials for the use of the Navy, Mr. HUME observed, that the present vote was an immense sum to be voted for such a purpose, at a time when they were stopping the building of ships. As he was upon his legs, he wished to know if there was any truth in the statement that the squadron at Spithead was to be detained fourteen days on account of a Court martial ? Sir JAMES GRAHAM said that the squadron were not detaiced on that account. Mr. C. PELHAM said, that the diminution of oak timber in this country was every day becoming greater and greater, and he thought there ought to be a bounty or encouraging the growth of what was so important to the defence of the country. Colonel SIBTHORPE observed, that if some measures were not resorted to, the timber of the country would fall to the ground. Mr. HUME should rather see the timber growing, than in the stores of the Navy. It had of late been frequently made matter of complaint that men could not be found to enter into the Naval service. He would tell them the reason. Seamen, though now almost starving in the dif ferent ports of the Empire, were averse from entering into the service, from a knowledge of the arbitrary power possessed by the Copt tins in the Navy. Sir JAMES GRAHAM said the Board of Admiralty hail it under consideration to place the power exercised by Captains under stricter controul, and to take every pre caution to avoid the necessity of impressment ; but he feared that. from time to time, circumstances could not fail to arise which would render a recourse to that mode of obtaining men altogether unavoidable. He had to observe, in reference to the boatmen engaged in the Preventive Service, that the patronage had been transferred from the Treasury to the Board of Admiralty; but an arrangement was made upon the subject which he had no doubt would prove satisfactory. Sir GEORGE CLERK heard with great satisfaction the Right Hon. Baronet opposite declare that it was im possible for the business of the Navy to be carried on without impressment. Mr. HUME observed upon the folly of taking on and discharging men in the Navy. He hoped that the present vote of 20,000 was for the year, and that they would not be discharged immediately on being trained. Sir JAMES GRAHAM informed the Hon. Member that there was no such intention on the part of his Ma farty's Government. CROKER next addressed the Committee, but so frequently dropped his voice towards the close of sentences, that the purport of his observations could not be fully col lected. Ile was understood to make some complaint re specting the regulation by which Warrant Officers as such were prevented from paying their reapects to the Sovereign. Sir J. GRAHAM said, that with respect to what had fallen from the Right Hon. Gentleman with respect to the order for the exclusion of full pay officers from Court, it appeared to him that the Right lion. Gentleman had an swered himself; for it did not appear that Ire (Mr. Croker) doubted the clear and undeniable right of the Admiralty to make that order. If the Right Hon. Gentleman thought proper to impug❑ the justice of that order, he (Sir J. Gra ham) would be prepared to justify the necessity of some such sort of restraint. Mr. CROKER thought that the order had originated from some mistake or etror ; and he was therefore much surprised to hear the lUght Hon. Baronet say that he was prepared to defend its propriety.—(Hear, hear.) Accord ing to that order, those officers who were on full pay were prevented from attending at Court, while those on half-pay had no such restriction imposed upon them, though some of these persons might have been put upon hall-pay for misconduct. Anything, so absurd or preposterous as this arrangement he had never heard of.—(Hear, hear.) Sir JAMES GRAHAM said, that if this order had arisen from error (and he by no means admitted that that was the case), it was at all events only an error in point of form ; for the Right lion. Gentleman had not yet im pugned the substance of the order. If the Right Hon. Gent] , man wished to raise the question of its propriety, he (Sir J. Graham) would be quite prepared to meet him on it. Mr. CROKER said, that if that was the only expla nation he could obtain, lie should be disposed to make a distinct motion on the subject. He was prepared to deny altogether the power of the Admiralty to make any such order. Sir J. GRAHAM, in that case, should reserve him self for the distinct motion of the Right Heu. Gentle man.—(A laugh. )‘ Mr. CROKER said that that reservation would not serve the Right Hon. Gentleman.—(Hear, bear.) Did the Right Hon. Baronet now renew his statement that it was a question of doubt whether the Admiralty had the authority which it had exercised ? The CHAIRMAN (amid general laughter) put the vote, which was carried without any further observation from Sir James Graham. On the vote of 24,0401. for the expence of packets, &c. Mr. CHOKER asked some questio❑ relative to the tonnage lately advertised for by the Government ; but we were not able to catch the exact purport of the R:ght lion. Gentleman's observations. Sir J. GRAHAM stated, i❑ reply, that they had been required in aid of the quarantine service. Sir G. CLERK asked whether Government intended to allow, as was the report, goods to be unshipped at the Isle of Sheppey, which of itself was not a very healthy place? Sir J. GRAHAM felt that it would be indiscreet in him to give any pledge on the part of the Government. At present there was no fixed intention ; but the whole question was under the consideration of the Government and a Board of Health : and every endeavour would be made to meet every reasonable demand. Vote agreed to. On the vote of 88,5001. for the expence of conveying convicts to New South Wales, Mr. HUME wished to know whether any arrange ments had been made for lessening this expence ? Ile also wanted to know whether anything was about to be done for lessening the expence of the squadron off the coast of Africa, which was there for the prevention of the slave trade? He thought that a Committee ought to be appointed to inquire into the state of that trade. Colonel SIBTIIORPE thought the expence for the con veyance of convicts unwarrantable. Mr. CHOKER remarked, that the very efficiency of rur squadron was one of the causes of more cruelty being practised towards the negro, because it was the means of patting the slave-dealer more on Iris guard. Unless Eng and could persuade all the Maritime Powers to allow the ,:iglit of mutual search on the coast of Africa, the best thing we could do would be to leave off interfering alto gether. qtr J. GRAHAM agreed that the expence of the African squadron was enormous, and that so far from suc ceeding in depressing the amount of the traffic in slaves, that traffic was rapidly increasing. This country was un ble to effect a treaty with the Maritime Powers for the ;Oa of m,,tual starch on that coast ; and as long as that was the case, all attempts at putting down the trade must prove ineffective. A good deal of that trade had of late been carried on under the flag of France. Negosiations were now pending with that country, in consequence, and he trusted that no difficulties would be thrown in the way of a mutual right of search.--(Hear, hear.) After a few words from Mr. CaEssirr PELthum, Mr. EVA xs, and Mr. KEITH DOUGLAS, the vote was agreed to. On the vote of 63,3631. for the Victualling Yards, &c., Mr. CROKER asked whether it was true that cholera had displayed itself in the west of Ireland? Sir J. GRAHAM had not beard of any thing of the sort. Great distress had prevailed there, and the conse quence had been that fever had made its appearance.— Government had done every thing in its power to check its progress ; and he was happy to say that the distress itself was abating. The vote was then agreed to. On the vote of 86,4571. for the new works in the Me dical and Victualling Departments, Mr. HUME asked, whether it was still the rule of Government to apply sums specifically voted to the Go vernment service of the Navy? Sir J. GRAHAM said that Government would en deavour strictly to adhere to the objects for which the sums were voted ; and in the event of being obliged to break this rule, the earliest opportunity would be taken to apprise Parliament of the fact.—(Hear, hear.) _ . Vote agreed to. On the vole of )57,5761. fur Pensions to Medical Men, &c. Mr. HUME was aware that the rule of promotion in the navy now, was one for every three vacancies, but he thought this even was on too large a scale—and that, in fact, no single promotion ought to take place in the pre sent state of the country, except under the most extraor dinary circumstances. Sir J. GRAHAM regretted that the rule of promotion of one in three had not been resorted to earlier, and then there would not now be cause of complaint.—( Hear. ) After a few words from Mr. CROKER and Mr. HUME, Vote agreed to. £175,000, for the provisions of troops of foreign sh tions, was voted without remark or opposition. ARMY ESTIMATES. Sir H. PARNELL then brought forward the Army Estimates. As they were the same, with one exception, as the House had passed the last Session, he should not make any statement concerning them. With respect to that exception, the vote for the Volunteer and Yeomanry Corps which was then postponed, he should be ready to give any explanation required. After a few words from Sir H. HARDINGE, express ing, as was understood, a determination to offer no oppo sition to the votes, the number of 88,496 men were voted for the service of the year. Several items were agreed to without remark. On the vote for the Military Asylum, Captain BOLDERO wished for further time to con sider the estimates. Lord ALTHORP observed that the present estimates were all discussed last Session, and in pas‘ing them the House would only follow the precedent of 1807. After a few words from Mr. TRANT and Colonel EVANS, the vote was agreed to. IRISH YEOMANRY. On the motion for 189,503/. 19s. for defraying the charge of the Yeomanry and Volunteer Corps fur Great Britain and Ireland, _ Mr. O'CONNELL observed that the present Govern ment had involved itself in an error in reviving the Yeo manry Corps in Ireland. The Yeomanry was kept on foot for party purposes. Thus, in the small county of Ferma nagh, with only a population of 130,000, there were 2,000 yeomanry; while in all Munster, with a population of 1,900,000, there was only about an equal number, or 2,000. He had, on a former occasion, objected to the continuance of this force, and had received, not a pledge indeed, but an understanding from the Government, that it should be gradually discontinued. if the Administra tion had not been changed, that understanding would, he believed, have been adhered to ; but the new Government thought that it would be a good force, he supposed, to put down a popular cause ; that it would strengthen the Go vernment. He would rather see the King's troops in creased, which in Ireland had always done their duty, and nothing but their duty. It appeared from returns which he had laid on the table, that four times more men fell by the police than by the executioner. Thus four times more men were shot to punish riots, than to punish all other crimes. The land was red with blood spilled by the police. Let them look to the case of Castle Pollard; there ten men were slaughtered, because, as the police said, they were assailed by stones on going to their barracks, but it was stated by the nephew of the Earl of Fingal, Mr. Dease, that the police were animated by party feeling. To this police the yeomanry were only a supplementary force. He suppcised that one reason for keeping up the yeomanry was, that it was con sidered that this force was opposed to the repeal of the Union; but that was not necessary. The consequencte Was now evident. That at Newtownbarry their want of discipline had caused the shedding of blood, there could be no doubt. He had seen the letter of a magistrate who had sat on the investigation, which placed it beyond a doubt, that among this body there was a readiness to shed blood, and a want of discipline. The yeomanry ought not, therefore, on any account to be encouraged ; and if the Government wanted to keep up bad feeling., it could not fall on a better method tlasu to keep up this force. Thre:i. out of four of the districts of Ireland were unanimous against it. He called on the Irish Members to remember that they were bound to their constituency to stand by him in resisting this vote.—(llea.r.) There was not one Member who had a liberal constituency who was not pledged to resist it. The people recollected that force, as connected with the civil war which had been superinduced to extinguish the Irish Legislature. If the Government wanted to increase the force—friend as he was of economy he would readily assent to any increase the Government alight think necessary of the King's troops. He could not tell the House with what disgust and abhorrence exciting to resistance the yeomanry corps were held in by the people of Ireland. The privates of the yeomanry were not men of property, as w4l supposed, and even the officers were not one in a hundred men of independent circumstances.— . . chancea other e s e POk p e ai u ts o not of s t u h e e h North o f ' officers lad fe nol° the but thre in butof o pfy disturbance; they had an interest against tranquillity.-- (No, no.) Gentlemen cried no He spoke only o f Con naught,lfilunaer, and Leinster. The yeomanry of the North were o ffi cered by gentlemen. In his own county the Captain of one corps was an insolvent, and had been lately whitewashed ; and what chance had such a man except of being whitewashed again, unless there were dis turbances ? He would move to reduce the vote by the sum of 19.2911. the suns allowed for the yeomanry of Ireland. The Hon. and Learned Gentleman concluded by moving that instead of 189,8031., 170,512/. be substituted. Mr. STANLEY could not approve of the judgment and taste of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman in calling upon the Irish Members to support him, reminding them of their constituency and free election., t.) induce them to support him in his proposition to diminish this grant. The Hon. and Learned Gentleman might have spared this appeal to the Irish Gentlemen, and his imputations on the yeomanry particularly, when he stated that he knew no thing of that part of Ireland to which five-sixths of the yeomanry belonged. He did not deny the yeomanry might be tinctured by party feelings. In Munster he believed they had exhibited such feelings, but he did nut think the Hon. and Learned Member had exercised much discretion in referring to the subject. He concurred entirely in the encomiums the Hon. and Learned Gentleman had passed o n the King's troops, who, under circumstances of great difficulty and embarrassment, more particularly in per forming the important duties which devolved on them in consequence of the d:sturbed state of the counties of Clare, Galway, and Roscommon, had exhibited qualities which would reflect honour on any soldi er y, an d h a d d one th e i r duty in a manner which deserved the warmest thanks and t h e gratitude of all the lovers of peace and good order.— ( Hear, hear.) He could not approve of that want of de lie,ey—he had almost said of the want of feeling of ho nesty--in the lion. and Learned Gentleman, which made him bring before the House, and expose to the passions of the Home —not to their jud gment —t wo un f or t unate affairs wh ich the Police and the Yeomanry had had with the multitude. In one case there were 21 persons await ing a verdict that might assign them to death. In the other, the Coroner's Inquest was yet sitting on the bo di es , and lie had no official information that a verdict had . yet been given. —(Mr. O'Connell said cofnosridtetrieati)o,enomtoantrlyie.se They could e w o h ul e d n a no v t ot y e e l t va f s or p u r l o : it wa s impossible.) If no verdict had been found, that . mad e . it peculiarly inexpedient and unjust to diawedment on these cases. With regard to the police, he " bel i eve ,' that they had behaved with the greatest temper, and be was sure that it was i mpossible to do without son e c i v il force like the police. He did not w;sh to revive un pleasant recollections, but he was sure that the state of Ireland was such, that the Government had no chance but to rely on the loyalty, the tried loyalty of the yeomanry of Ire land. The Right Hon. Gentleman concluded by declaring that be should resist the amendment of the Hon. anti Learned Gentleman. Mr. O'CONNELL would withd raw hi s amen d ment , if the Government would give him a n u n d erstan di ng that there should be no increase of the yeomanry. As this was only the usual vote, he would not press his amendment. Lord A LTHORP declined to give any such under standing. Sir W. STRICKLAND at any future period would gladly vote for the reduction of the yeomanry ; but at this ' mo ment, he hoped the Hun. Member woull not persevere in his motion. Mr. O'CONNELL expressed his assent to this ree.nm tnendation ; but he wished to know if any increase of the yeomanry in Ireland was in contemplation ; or if any other vote than the present would he proposed for Ireland ? Mr. STANLEY had no hesitation in saying, that there was not any intention to increase the number of yeomanry of Ireland. Colonel PERCIVAL defended the conduct of the yeo manry of Ireland, who were, in his opinion, entitled to the praise of having preserved the peace of the kingdom. Colonel EVANS, although he did not approve of the Yeomanry as a military, yet (lid not think that Ireland was in a condition to have them altogether and suddenly sup pressed. He was of opinion, however, that it would be much more economic•d to employ the regular army in pre ►erving the peace of that country, and to diminish the yeomanry corps as speedily and as extensively as they could, without giving offence. Mr. CONNOLLY defended the conduct of the yeo manry and police. ta. Mr. LEFROY, jun. reminded -the House that there were only two cases within a very long period in which there could be founded the slightest charge against the conduct of the yeomanry. These were the affairs of Castlepollard and Newtownbarry ; and he must say, he agreed with the Right Hon. Secretary for Ireland in thinking that it was very bad taste on the part of the Hon. Member for Kerry (Mr. O'Connell) to allude to them as he had done on the present occasion, when the acts at tributed to the police and yeomanry were not authenticated by evidence before any regular tribunal.—(Hear, hear.) A MEMBER, who spoke from beneath the gallery, said, there were, he understood, 23,000 yeomanry in the north of Ireland, and 2,000 in Munster. Now he should be glad to know where they were to find regular troops to supply their place if the yeomanry were disbanded ? Mr. HUME Paid, they had hitherto been on the subject of the Irish yeomanry : he now wished to draw their at tention to the English. What need was there in this country for a large yeomanry force to be kept up at a great expense? How much better would it not be to have a Burgher Guard?—(Shouts of laughter.) He repeated it —(Laughtet)--a Burgher Guard that would serve with out pay, instead of yeomanry corps which cost the country 170,0001. for their pay and expenses.—(Cries of " No, no.") He said yes, yes.—(A laugh.) There it was on the estimates, and let any one who understood figures look at it and say no if they could.—(Hear, hear.) He would not embarrass the Government by opposing the vote, but be hoped that it would be the last required for the same purpose. The Marquis of CHANDOS could not allow the vote to pass without protesting against the language used by the Hon. 'Member respecting the yeomanry of England. They were the most useful as well as the most constitutional force the country could employ. He had the honour to command a troop of yeomanry in bis county. Mr. HUME could only say, i❑ reply to the Noble Mar quis, that when he last moved fur a return of the sum ex pended on yeomanry corps, he found the Noble Marquis and his troop had a part of it. Mr. HUNT differed from the Noble Marquis as to the efficiency of the yeomanly. On a recent occasion, in Wales, it was well known that one-half of a troop which came put down a riot was disarmed by the mob, and that the other half ran away.—(A laugh, and hear.) He said this without meaning any personal offence.—(A laugh.) He knew none of the officers; but there was no doubt the corps had been of no service there, and he be lieved they would, from other reasons, be of no service elsewhere. He stated nothing but what he could prove. He knew something of yeomanry corps of old. He had been present when whole troops had ran away.—(A laugh.) This was during the war, and he repeated, he thought they were the worst kind of force that could be employed to preserve the peace of the country. Lord ALTHORP had no connection with any volun teer or yeomanry corps, but he had seen a good dell of them in the course of his life, and he must say, he believed the description given of them by the Member for Preston, to be incorrect. Mr. R. GORDON said, it would be a curious thing to look into the debates on every estimate for the last fifty years, and to observe how much opinions had changed. At that time patriots as good as the Member for Middle sex, or the Member for Preston, thought the only Con stitutional force was a yeomanry or militia, and now it would appear they were all for die employment of a stand ing army. Mr. HUNT read a paragraph from a Sunday Paper, in _ . which the writer stated that he had seen a gentleman from the neighbourhood of Sittinghourne, in Kent, who assured him that the farmers were under great apprehen sion of the renewal of the burnings of last year—(Cries of no, no.) With respect to the yeomanry, he was really at a loss to understand on what ground they were so admir able a force as some Lion. Gentlemen seemed to consider them.—(Coughing.) He bad been sent to the House by the people, and he had a right to be heard—(Loud and continued coughing.) It would better become any Hon. Member to try to answer him than to endeavour to put him down in that manner. Mr. TREVOR was persuaded that the yeomanry would be by far the most efficient force that could be resorted to in a time of danger ; and expressed the indignation with which he had heard them depreciated by the Hon. Mem bers for Preston and Middlesex. Mr. Alderman THOMPSON said, that although he certainly was unable to bear testimony to the good conduct of the Glamorganshire yeomanry, their officers had shown the greatest zeal and courage. He was certainly of opinion that it would be better to spend the money which it was proposed to vote fur the yeomanry on a regular force. Mr. G. LAMB should have great confidence in the English yeomanry, if any necessity were to arise for their exertions. An HoN. MEMBER, whose name we were unable to learn, eulogised the character and conduct of the yeomanry in Scotland, especially in 1820. Mr. S. RICE defended the conduct of the Ministry by whom the disembodying of the yeomanry had been carried into effect. Sir M. W. RIDLEY reprobated the unjustifiable lan guage used by some Hon. Members with reference to the yeomanry of England. It was a force admirably calcu lated to repress the tumults excited by the bad advice of those who had too touch the ear of the people.—(Hear.) To his knowledge, the whole country was highly indebted to the yeomanry of the North of England for their recent efforts in maintaining public tranquillity. Major PETRE spoke highly of the conduct of the yeomanry of Yorkshire. After a few words from Mr. HUNT, the amendment was withdrawn, and the original resolution agreed to. Resolutions for granting 135,0001. for the pay of General Officers, not being Colonels of Regiments, and 95,3991. for the pay of retired and unattached Officers, were also agreed to. On the resolution for granting 697,800/. for half-pay and military allowances for retired Officers, Sir 11. HARDINGE expressed his hope that before the Appropriation Act was brought forward, the ease of the half-pay Officers would be taken into consideration with a view to some amelioration of their condition. The Corn. tnittee of 1828 bad recommended the employment of the half-pay Officers in civil occupations. He trusted this re commendation would be attended to. He knew many crippled ßaroi by Baronet would bring 01,:peficdertshteeoRmiguhcthlion.militaryfwurard some duty but quite competent to the dischar ge o f a c ivil offi c e. Ile plan having this object in view ; if not, he would do so himself. Mr. HUME thought that military men, after long ser vice, became very incompetent for civil situations. He wished to know what was the rule with respect to pro motions in the army, and how the vacancies were filled up, whether from the half-pay or not ? Sir H. PARNELL said there was no fixed rule on the subject.—Vote agreed to. A sum of 91,300/. was voted for half-pay to Officers of Standing Foreign Corps, and for allowances to their widows and children. A sum of 27,1741. was agreed to fur allowances to reduced Local Militia Adjutants and Serjeant-Majors of Yeomanry. 147,778 were voted for pensions to the Widows of Officers, for 1831. ..120,6141. were voted for allowances for compensation in the list of Royal Bounties. On the motion for a grant of 1,335,986/. for Chelsea and Kilmainhum Hospitals, Sir 11. lIARDINGE wished to call the attention of the •te to a - matter of some Right lion. lion. Baronet opposite auce. He understood that a great number of officers had made a commutation of their half - pay to b ec om e colonial settlers, and that under this arrangement they had received three or four years" ia ff-pay ; but this money had not been paid to them under ci rcumstances that would ensure their going out. If that Were the c as e , the whole of the ob j ect of the arrangemen t would be defeated, and these men would have come upon their parishes for support. lie understood that '7 or 800 men iu Ireland were in the lame situation. The case with respect to them was still stronger than with respect to the half-pay officers of England ; for the latt• r could have their parishes to resort to, but the former would be without that support. He thought that some caution ought to be used on this matter, and that, for the protec tion of these soldiers, the Right Hon. Secret try ought to refuse to allow them to make the commutation, unless they actually went abroad, as settlers, nor to make it after they were 45 years of age. If the new regulations were well acted upon, he was quite sure that the Peniion List might be reduced 200,0001. within the space of 10 years. The Right Hon. Baronet ought to stand between the soldier and the public for the protection of both. Sir. H. PARNELL said that no commutation had been yet agreed to but what he found commenced and in pro gress when he took office. New regulations were in pre paration, and he assured the Gallant Officer that he was quite willing to act in the character which the Gallant Officer had recommended him to assume. After a few words from Colonel SIBMORPE the vote was agreed to.-35,3601. were voted for Superannuation Allowances. O❑ the motion that tLe CliAlamAx should report these resolutions to the House, Mr. GORDON would take that or partunity of ob serving upon some complication of accounts in the office of Vice-Treasurer of Ireland. It had not taken place during the time that Mr. M. Fitzgerald was in office; but he understood that this confusion did exist, and that it extended for some time back. He wished to know if this report was true ; if any loss had occurred, and what steps had been taken to recover it ? Lord ALTHORP said that the accounts of the former Vice-Treasurer hal not been made up till lately. They had recently been presented, and were now under the con sideration of the Auditors. Mr. GORDON observed, that it was then true that ti e accounts had been unsettled for years. Mr. RICE admitted that to be the fact ; but said it was not the fault of the late Board of Treasury, who had often pressed for the accounts. Mr. HUME wished to know what was the arronit of money unaccounted for? Mr. RICE could not tell till the accounts hal be. n audited. Mr. GORDON blamed the delay of the late Government. Mr. HUME said the blame was still the more when it • was considered that this same person had been recently ap pointed to the government of a colony. That appoint ment particularly ought to be inquired into. Sir J. NVROTTESLEY thought the late Chancellor of the Exchequer ought-to give some explanation upon the subject. He wished also to know who had recommended this officer to his appointment abroad ? Mr. GOULBURN said it was difficult to give any explanation when he was not in the possession of official documents. Mr. O'CONNELL observed that this case was a had one. The officer in question had had a salary of 2,000/. a year, and it seemed that for five years he had been permitted to receive 10,000/. a year of the public money without accounting for it. The House resumed, and the report was ordered to be brought up to-morrow, and the Committee was ordered to sit again on Wednesday. The Bill for the New Street from Waterloo-bridge was read a second time. Mr. STANLEY gave notice that on Friday next he would move for leave to bring in a Bill to regulate the Importation of Arms into Ireland, and the Possession of Arms in Ireland. He also gave notice that on Monday he would bring in a Bill to amend the Representation of Ireland. Lord ALTHORP moved for leave to bring in a Bill to prohibit the Growth of Tobacco in Ireland. The Noble Lord also moved for leave to bring in a Bill to reduce the Salary of his 'Majesty's Master of the Mint. Papers relating to the cholera morbus were laid upon the table. The House adjourned at a Quarter-past One. DESCRIPTION of the CHOLERA in RUSSIA. (From the London Medical Gazette for June2s.) We have procured Sir W. Crichton's account of the disease, which is as follows : " General uneasiness ; violent headache and giddiness ; great languor ; oppression at the chest ; pa'n at the pit of the stomach and sides; a very weak puke and frequent vomiting, first of undigested food, and then of a watery fluid mixed with phlegm ; frequent purging ; severe pains ; cessation, or very scanty secretion, of urine ; excessive thirst ; cramps in the legs, beginning at the toes, and by degrees reaching the body ; voice feeble and hoarse; eyes dull, and sunk in the be al; the features changed ants like those of a corpse ; coldness, contraction, and bluish tinge of extremities; coldness over the who's body, the lips and tongue becoming blue; cold and clammy perspiration. The vomiting and purging soon exhaust the patient ; .the spasms become greater, attacking the most vital parts ; the pulse ceases ; the beating of the heart becomes scarcely sensible ; and the patient, after suffering the most horrid martyrdom, dies quietly, having a few moments' ease just before his end. The duration of this malady is generally from twenty-four to twenty-eight hours; but sometimes its course is still more rapid." SECOND EDITION. SUN OFFICE, Seven o'clock. rHE LONDON GAZET TE OF THIS EVENING. War Mae, June 1831. 4th Regiment of Light Dragoons—R. Knox, Gent. to be Cor net, by purchase, vice 31' Donogh, appointed to the 10th Light Dragoons, dated June 1831. 10th Light Dragoons—Cornet Hon. Peray Moreton, to be Lou t ,nant, by purchse, vice Sunman, whe retires; Cornet M. M.Donogh, from the 4th Light dragoons, to be Cornet and Ridingmaster, vice Moreton, June 9th Regiment of Foot—Captain W. S. Dalton, from the half pay, to be Captain, vice P. R. M. Browne, who exchanges re ceiving the difference, June 28. 98th Foot—Lieut. F. B. Russell, from the 99th Foot, to he Leutenant, vice Griffith, who exchanges, June 2S. _ . 38th Fool—Lieut. and WartermasterC..lVilles, from the 50th Foot, to be Lieutenant, Vice Ware, appointed Paymaster of the 49th Foot, June 28. 46th Foot—Capt. It. Ellis, from the half-pay, to be Captain, vice W. Campbell, who exchanges, receiving the dit*rence, June 28. 47th Foot—Captain P. Dundas to be Major, by purchase, vice Jeukin, who retires; Lieut C. Thursby to be Captatn, by pur chase, vi:te Dundas; Ensign R. Allan to be Lieutenant, by pur chase, vice Thursby • H. Tollemache , Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Allan, 18. 49th Foot—Lieut. H. Ware, from the tlSth Foot, to be Pay. master, vice Brook, deceased, June 28. 50th Foot—Lieut. 'l'. Freer, from half-pay 63d Foot, to be Quartermaster, vice Willes, appointed to the:3Bth Foot, June a 3. 69th Foot—Lieut. W. C. Caldwell, from half-pay OOth Fout, to be Lieutenant, vice A. H. Hull, who exchanges, June t-ki. 99th Foot—Lieut. J. Griffith, from the 23th Foot, to be Lieu. tenant, vice Russell, who exchanges, June '2B. BREVE'!'. Captain A. Irvine, of the Bengal Engineers, to be Major in the East Indies only, for distinguished services in the field, June DECLARATIONS OF INSOLVENCY. FRANCISWYArr,CIifton, Gloucester, livery stable-keeper. JOHN GOODE, Wilderness-row, St. John-street, Clerken. well, engineer. DAVID SHARP, Mahlon, Essex, cattle-dealer. JOHN HUDSON, Norton, Leicester, grocer. BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED. . JOHN WILSON and STEPHEN L'ILLEY MAN, Gold. smith -street, silkman, from July I to August 19, at twelve at the Court of Commissioners. BANKRUPTS. THOMAS METCALFE MOSES, Stockton-upon-Tees, Durham, to surrender July 8, Aug. 2, and 9, at eleven, at the King's Arms, Durham. Taylor, Clement's Inn; Marshall, Durham. DANIEL BEAUMONT PAYNE, HENRY HOPE, and GEORGE HULBERT HOPE, Wells, Somersetshire, bankers, July 9, 12, at nine, and August 9, at two, at the Swan Hotel, Wells. Dyne, Lincoln's-inn-fields, London ; Brookes, Wells. JOHN PALMER, Constitution-hill, Birmingham, scriviner, July 7. 8, at twelve, and Aug. 9, a t th r ee, at the Union Inn, Birmingham. Home, Frampt on , anp L o f tus , New Inn, Loud on; Parker, Birmingham. HA RR' ET 'l'A PPER , Ti tc hfl e ld, i nn k ee p e r, July 8, a t t we l ve, , 9, at ten, and Augu s t 9, at t h ree , a t th e Bugle Inn. Hohne, Frampton, and Loftus, N ew I nn , London ; Paddon, Far c h am; Southampton. JOHN LOW OVERTON Leamington-Priors, Warwick s hire, builder, July 11, a t seven , a t the office of Mr. S. Haynes, Leam ington-Priors, 12, and August 9, at twelve, at the Swan Hotel, Warwick. Sharpe and :Field, Old Jewry, London; Mr. S. W. Haynes, Warwick. WILLIAM PAVIISON, Wetherby, York, spirit-merchant, July 8,9, at four, and August 9, at eleven, at the Angel Inn, Wetherby. B.atye, Fisher, and Sudlow, Chancery-lane; Baillic, Tadcaster. JOSEPII PHILLIPS, Brook-street, Holborn, t o b accon i s t , July 1, at twelve, 8, at eleven, and Augu s t 9 , at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners. Norton, Jelly in -street, Cripplegate. and Smith, Cooper JOHN LUKE, Mark-lane, wine -merchant, July 1, 12, at ten, and August 9, at nine, at the Court of Commissioners. Cruck o,„ilk, Ring's Arms-yard, Coleman -street. WILLIAM WILLSHER arid GEORGE WILLSHER, nine, at the Court of Commissioners. Young, Mark-lane. Oxtbrd-street, bakers, July 8 and 15, ,s_h an at ten, g a h n a r i l i. s A t r u e g e u t st 9, at JEREMIAH BROWN, Sheerness/ Kent, barge-wiper, July 8 and 15, arid August 9, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. ANN SAY WELL, QueenLorough, Kent, linen-draper, July 8, IS, at one, and August 9, at eleven, at the Court of Commis. sioners. Aubrey, Hatton -garden, London ; Edmeades, Sheerness. EDWARD W ILL IA 31 BISHOP, G eorge-street, South ampton-street, Pentonville, surveyor, July 5,8, and August 9, at eleven, at the Court of Commisiones. Sylvester and Co., Smith, Weir, Furnival's Inn, Holborn. WILLI AM MOORE and JOAN M'CREIGHT, Liverpool, corn-merchants, July 25, 26, and August 9, at one, at the Cla rendon Rooms, Liverpool. Blackstock and Mince, King's Bench. walk, 'I emple, London • Bardswell, Liverpool. WILLIAM TASKI!It, Oldham, Lancashire, innkeeper, July 21), 21, and August 9, at one, at the York Hotel, Manche,. ter. Shuttleworth, Rochdale ; Smith ' Chancery-lane. THOMAS WEST and AAItON BRAIN, jun. Conhams Clioue.lstershir twelve, at Dee anu Loftus, N, WILLIAM aud August 9, ley, Liverpool- IM PE' The House Were read by purned till F took his seat The 141arqt the Poor Lag The Marq from the tow ductiou of Po Would favour they would thought that Way of Riving The Marc!' Thursday nex Parliamentar Lord SKI against the tr Ti Dul that the pet It was the ( 1 reply con n lilt () the dis to by the N for the Seer The Earl the violence been exagg( for the pur electing rep been detea freeholders. to any law or against cour.e adop Lord Dt Proper pro( these proce Lord BI Berated acc The peti The Lor /louse, to i an Hon. A: 'tated in ti James J tFe Hon. Prepared tc ttturned, a corrected. The SP identity of the Lord A in attendan Mr. Ald incorpor The kei hal commi On the 1 ton Pier 13 Mr: H( aintain a Ranover-st read.a first On the to bring in nd Geo. I: tious recov trier. On the 4, 1 d Basfor Mr. Sr, vazious pla load Bill. Lord M of the Ma Petitions i Lill. On bradford 1 toad Bill, HL g classes ter n Distil titioners e th e .g Cas restriction ttelied it strong lar Were br( Act in qt keep the p Th e Hon. he ili.,grael Statute-b< arid exeit 11 ow that Lostile to repealed. of the Pr ir confine the othe f or publis Item or a iva la i ita o i . r i tion of th coini ng fr Ihe wishei session a sons whi Alember Guardian 'Poke in his Alaj t l t hat porn ternity of read tiles( Rous e ye ( Erc,,s lib,