The Sun. — London, England, 1831-09-23 00:00:00

sling, and that it would not require a vast deal of rhetoric to persuade men, already impatient under suffering., to have recourse to measures of a very efficacious nature. They see that the time for trifling is past—that no class of men can now be suffered to indulge in caprices, from which such serious consequences may result ; and hence, with heart and soul, all classes, rich and poor now pull together. The meeting this day of the merchants, bankers, and traders of the metropolis—men to whom peace and order are of the first importance, and who know well what would he the consequence of the slightest diminution of confidence—will show the Peers, in a way not to be mis understood, that the wealth as well as industry of the nation is bent on Reform. Earl Grey, from his announc ing a wish to consult the convenience of the House in fixing on a distant day for the second reading, if there were no discussion on the first, would seem to have been aware that no attempt would be made to throw out the Bill in the outset. After the second reading, we presume that the Bill will proceed without delay.—Morn. Chronicle. The argument of Sir R. Peel, that because Mr. Ri cardo and Sir H. Parnell thought, heavy as the taxation of the country was, it might still outgrow it, we ought therefore to take no security against the possibility of future additions to it, was curious enough. " That there was much taxation," said the Right Honourable Baronet, " could not he denied; but he had the authority of the ablest political economists—lie had the authority of Mr. Ricardo and Sir Henry Parnell for declaring that the people of this country were taxed less in proportion to their means than the people of any country in the world. 4Tbe Right Honourable Baronet here read an extract from Sir Henry Parnell's work, entitled Financial Re form, in which the author speaks of the energy w hi c h existed in this country, and treated the difficulties under which it was labouring as temporary in their character.] How, with such opinions, the Right Honourable Baronet (Sir Henry Parnell) could call upon him (Sir Robert Peel) to consent to alter the Constitution of the country, he was at a loss to conceive." Sir Robert Peel has not been just towards Sir Henry Parnell, because, though Sir Henry admits the energy and powers of the country, he also dwells on the enormous waste of the public income, on the abuse of superannuations, and other modes of quartering the children and dependents of the higher classes on the country. All these abuses flowed necessarily from the corrupt state of the representation. No Minister, as is well known, durst hint at economy till a falling off in the produce of the taxes gave rise to discontent ; and then a Finance Com mittee was merely intended as a blind to the public. And when latterly in the House, Ministers were a little press ing on economy, Mr. 'ferries plumply told Members that they were always disposed to go farther in the way of etonomy than the House would allow them. The country is no doubt possessed of great energy ; but the borough mongers are possessed of still greater rapacity. The country might outgrow its present taxation, but the borouglimon gers would take care to take equal strides with the ration. The nun in the fable, however quickly lie walked, found that his shadow kept pace with him ; and the borough mongers would keep pace with us, however quirkly we might run. It is good to belong to an industrious arid energetic nation ; but it is not good that the funds of that indostry and energy should serve to maintain not mere!) , the industrious and energetic themselves, and the indivi stluals necessary for - the public service, hut also a number of n o ble and genteel paupers, who might as well he employed in adding to tlie resources of the nation as in diminishing the weans of enjoyment of others.-Ilforning Chronicle The efforts which the Ministerial Journals of Paris are now m aking to purify, in the eyes of the nation, the Cabinet of Louis Philippe from the disgrace which its polity towards Poland has brought upon it, cannot he sue_ cessitel snail justice, truth, and honour perish altogether from the' earth, and public virtue ceases to receive even a hypocritical homage among mankind. To all the elabo rent sophistry which those journals have recourse to in vindication of the weak and treacherous conduct of the Trench Ministry, diirine a struggle which did not 'wren affect the existence of Poland, hut involved the interest, of France and the rights and hopes of civilized Europe ras opposed to the increasing power of that giant barbarism Which threatens at some day to overwhelm them, there is one short, decisive, and resistless answer. It is the reek ing sacrifice of Warsaw—enveloped in flame and carnage— with the bitted of her slaughtered inhabitants—filling to the brim the last trenches of freedom, and crying up to Heaven for vengeance ! Shall the blood of Poland cry to Heaven in vain ? That question is at the disposal of an Almighty Power, who will remember justice, and wh. saith " Vengeance is mine." But the earthly Powers that might have averted the calamity that inflicts upon Europe the crime of the third desolation of Poland, woule now endeavour to escape from the reproach of that atro cious massacre which they permitted, and to leave a., Russia the undivided infamy of that guilty triumph at which they connived. As to the Governments of Prussia and Aus tria,the infamous partiality of their conduct during their con flict between Poland and Russiawas to be expected of them. Prussia especially violated the principal of neutrality in every thing but actually taking up arms against the Poles. British property was seized in its transit through that State to Warsaw—British and French passports treated with contempt, and British and French subjects illegally detained upon their journeys ; but no remonstrance worthy of England and France escaped the lips of either th. British or French Minister for Foreign Affairs, in vindi cation of the insulted national honour, which it was their duty to protect. In diplomatic tact and flame, Sebaatiani. though infinitely superior to Lord Palmeraton, rivalled hilt in a truckling subserviency to the arrogant injustice of the Prussian Government. Cautious at first in its vexatious proceedings, the Court of Berlin, emboldened by the feeble ness or connivance of French and English policy, soon threw off all disguise. and assisted the hostile operations o. Russia without moderation or decency—furniatiing het armies with supplies, and with all the materiel of war, with as much z al as she intercepted every thine of the sort, or suspected to be intended for that purpose, on in way to Poland. We gave some time ago an account of the seizure of the property of a British merchant in in passage through Prussia, and the sort of redress which he obtained at the hands of Lord Palmerston- But we never supposed this third-rate pupil of the school o Castlereagh had the capacity, intelligence, or principle, which would qualify him to fill with credit to himaelf, or advantage to the country, the important office for which the evil genius of a Whig Administration selected him ; we are therefore not surprised that the honour, the cha racter, and the interests of the country, have suffered in the most important of our foreign relations. When we first charged Prussia and Austria with a violation of the principle of neutrality with regard to Poland, we re collect that the Courier denied the charge, by opposing to public facts its own inference—namely, that it was the interest of those States to aesist rather to oppose the esta blishment of Polish independence, and therefore it was not possible they could show any partiality for Russia. It was in vain for us to say there was no reasoning against facts, and to argue that although those States feared Rus elan ambition ever so much, they dreaded freedom, in every shape, still more; but we must do the Courier the justice to say that when the evil became very flagrant, that journal warmly denounced the conduct of the Prussian ainoverament, though it still endeavoured to screen that official weakness at borne which encouraged its insolent in. justice. But if the despotic genius of the States of Prus sia and Austria, along with the criminal consciousness of being themselves sharers in the plunder of oppressed and defrauded Poland, naturally made the Governments of those c ountries anxious for the success of the Russian arms, neither of those causes existed to induce the Eng lish Cabinet to sympathise with the council of the autocrat; but, on the contrary, as free States, they bad An interest in seeing that the freedom of Poland was secured as it had been guaranteed to her by the Treaty of Vienna, to which England and France were subscribing parties. Was it an inflexible attachment to the principle of non- interference which prevented our Whig Ministry front re monstrating, in a manner worthy the character of tile British nation, on behalf of the holy cause of Poland, of justice, and humanity ? Alas ! their volumiineas pro tocols and multiplied conferences on the affiirs of Belgium and Holland take away from them such a subterfuge. But the Holy Alliance were the associates of England and France iu the " settlement" of the affairs of Belgium, and the Holy Alliance were opposed to any Intervention by England and France on behalf of Poland ; and it must be admitted that the great despots of the Continent have hitherto found the Administration of revolutionized France tend the Whig Ministry of Great Britain abundantly sub. eervient. The French Government is attempted to be delsended by the Messager des Chambred, on the ground that as France could give no assistance to Poland in the years 171;: 1 -5, it was not to be expected that it could afford Any at the present time. But the two cases are not parallel. Frai:Ce had then not only to sustain a ter r ible war along the Whole line of her frontiers against the armies of the Contineotal despots, but to oppose, in addition, the mighty power and Yast resources of England -- that England , without whose fleet an d w h ose ' treasures the whole united strength oth des pots would ha ve sunk f o r e o v l • s e , r d b i e ff n e e r a e t . n h t t i t e i e e s rior genius of Fr ance. ease now, L o bat e ` n energetic re when England is the friend Instead of the enemy of France ! We are quite confident monstrance from both those Powers, of Poland; nor en from Eng land alone, would have averted the fate tnity of tng l ")d? With the certainty of provoking she hos , while the Continent is in the precarious state that it is, would Russia have dared to commence the carnage which has not been consummated in the trenches and streets of Wars for the se , ffilds have yet to demand the Wood of patriots which the sword of war has spared. But the English and French Cabinets are directly charged by the Polish Government with treacherously abusing their con fidence for their own selfish interests. They speak of pro mises from the French and English Minister, which have been shamefully falsified. How will Lord Grey answer this ? But we know that if he cannot answer it satis'ac torily, the epitaph of Polish freedom will record the dis honour of his Administration.—Morning Herald. The Reform Bill has at length made its appearance in the 110119 P of Lords, and has, as our readers will see by the report, been read a first time. And when do Ministers intend to move the second reading will he asked with eager curiosity by all, with ardent impatience by a few. To morrow ? No, not to-morrow. Next day ? No, not next day. Then on Monday? No, not on Monday. How early then in the next week ? Alas, not next week at all. The Bill, for delaying which the friends of the British Constitution in the House of Commons have been stig matized and calumniated and reviled by Ministers and th;; friends of Ministers, is to be permitted by these same Ministers to lie for eleven days unheeded on the table of the House of Lords. This is, no doubt, respon sive to the feelings of the country, which has shewn pretty conclusively that its ardour and impatience for the consummation of the revolution have of late considerably abated. The people are in no hurry for the completion of the Bill, and the present Minister makes it a point of ho nour and conscience, unless when he has got a cousin to provide for at the national expense, to be always with the people. This extraordinary and unexpected postpone ment of the great measure will of course excite much speculation, and some will so read the riddle as to deduce from it the conclusion that the Minister is not ready for an early division in the Upper House of Parliament. When Parliament, after sitting all the summer, is still sitting, now that we have got to the latter end of Sep tember, and in the case too of a Bill already, as we have been told, more than abundantly discussed, the loss of eleven days, it may naturally enough be supposed, is not sought by a Minister who believes himself to be strong.— In the Commons the Ministers wanted no delay, they would have abridged even useful and necessary discussion to arrive with speed at the end of their task, and the rea son was. that in this House they could confidently reckon upon the result of every division. How different are their tactics now that they have no longer pledged Members and meek delegates to deal with ! They have become all at once languid, irresolute, and tardy, as much so, indeed, as if they were convinced that the first division will be fatal to their Bill and to their power. We can discover only two motives for this unexpected and unnatural post ponement. The first is the hope that in the interval be tween this time and next Monday se'nnight a change may be wrought in the opinions of some of the Noble oppo nents of the Bill. The second is the hope that some of the antirevolutionary Lords may be terrified into acqui• eacence in the measure by the petitions which arc now pre paling with so much art and industry. In either case the revolutionists are doomed, we imagine, to a bitter disap. peintment. The Lords, who have been firm until now, are not likely to adopt the Bill when even the rabble are de serting it; and the petitions, however numerous, can hardly be represented as speaking the sense of the country, in the face of Alderman Wood's admission, that the whole assemblage which, after every effort, could be collected to eether in favour of the measure in Guildhall, and on a Nloniley too, fell short of a thousand persons ; and when , he Hon. Baronet the Member for Westminster will ad mit also that he could not obtain an audience in Covent arden to listen to its praise one thousandth part so nu merous as the mobs who used to hang with rapture upon he eloquent harangues by which, in the early part of his eareer, he laboured to depreciate the bread and the beet consumed by the prisoners in the Middlesex House of Cor rection. We loiik forward, we confess, to Monday se'n light with renewed and invigorated confidence, from the mere circumstance that Earl Grey his preferred the second Monday to the first. —Morning Post. The speech of Sir R. Peel on Wednesday night was un doubtedly one of the most powerful, conclusive, and states inan.like ever delivered in the House of onsmons. The mints to which he mainly addressed himself were these : What are the evils complained of under the present system ? Can those evils be traced to our ancient Constitution? Will ' the Reform Bill remedy those evils ? In these three queries evidently lies the whole subject, and unless they can be ' satisfactorily answered by the clamourers for Reform, no ' case for Reform is made out. The Reformers having no ruth on their side, studiously avoid these questions. Sir R. Peel took a close and fearless view of them, and proved by ,iinute demonstration and by stubborn facts that the House of Commons as at present constituted has shewn ;tself available for every good purpose, and that the Re form Bill, so far front removing any evils that may exist, would effect incalculable mischief, and tend to general revolution. We hope that the imperfection in our report, necessarily arising from the lateness of the hour at which ,he speech was delivered, will soon be remedied by its publication in full ; but in the mean time we may safely 'efer to our Paper of yesterday to bear us out in the de scription we have given of Sir R. Peel's admirable reason ne, and his method of treating this solitary yet never ceasing argument of the Reformers—." The people demand his Bill ; they most and will have it, and there's an end of the matter."—Morning Post. The Thunderer—a noble vessel of two decks—was yesterday launched at Woolwich, and glided into the wa et with an ease and liking to it, which we hope is an omen to her of many glorious days in her country's cause ; and yesterdly, also, another Thunderer—a two-ffeeker—fo ,he King and Commons have only as yet agreed upon her equipment—was launched into the House of Lords, manned by a body of Commoners, whose integrity and zeal were manifested in a very unu.sual manner, but of whose ultimate success in the glorious cause which they have undertaken, we entertain not the slightest doubt. The launch of the Thunderer at Woolwich, was signalised by every circumstance calculated to render the event memorable. The King, the Queen, and the whole of the Court, were present; and it affords us pleasure to observe that, if the people had reason to be proud of their Majesties, their Majesties had also no less cause to be proud of their subjects. The crowd of well-dressed people was immense; and during the whole of their passage to and from Woolwich they were received with the most deafening chests, by tens of thousands of loyal subjects. With regard to the Thunderer launched into the House of Lords, we may also say that it took the water kindly—was welcomed by a first inspection, or ap• proval—and accompanied by a cortege, not of the royal patrons, but of about 250 Nobles and Commoners, who, instead of following the antiquated mode of merely nam ing the vessel confided to their Lordships' care, expressed 'heir anxious and heartfelt emotions on the subject by a round of gallant cheering. She is a trim, as well as a strong-built, vessel, and independent. -f he: accidental alliance with her Woolwich namesake, promises to bid defiance to every gale, rock, and quicksand, which may oppose her passage, through the Lords. Grey is an old, as well as a bold and experienced, pilot ; and there is no one who will serve the guns with more energy and decisive aim than Brougham. Before quitting this subject it is but fair to record the high esti mation in which we hold the services rendered by Lord Althorp and Lord John Russell, in their management of the Reform Bill. Few speeches have been made in the House of Commons of more sterling merit in every re ,p,o., than those of Lord John Russell on the introduc tion of the Bill ; while, notwithstanding some expres sion of impatience by us some time ago, at the slow progress of the Bill we are frank to own that language would ftil us were we to attempt to ex press our admiration of the steady and unflinching perseverance of Lord Aithorp in carrying the Bill through the House. No leader of the Commons ever hid a more factious opposition to encounter than that with which the Noble Lord had to contend ; but his good sense, as well as his good nature, proved triumphant, and we question greatly whether, under all circumstances, the Bill could have been entrusted to alder hands. He has now, most creditably to himself, and most satisfactorily to the country, discharged himself of the all-important task confided to him; and we have only to express our earnest wish that it may be as successfully managed in the Lords as it bas been in the Commons. It is no exaggeration to observe that on this point depends the peace of the country.— ' Morning Advertiser. The lateness of the hour at which Mr. Stanley de livered his speech in the House of Commons on Tuesday, will account fur the apparent injustice which we did him in our Paper of yesterday by omitting to name his effort with those of Mr. Macaulay and Mr. Croke'', as dis tinguished above the other speeches in the debate of Tues day night. Mr. Stanley not only distinguished himself on the occasion to which we allude by an eloquence worthy of his high character—he dispersed the whole fabric of ingenuity and assertion by which, with consider• able talent, we allow the Ex-Secretary contrived to raise a laugh for the benefit of the boroughtuo.gers. Let any im• partial man read the speech of Mr. Croker ; let him then turn to the a bl e commentary of . speech, and, if he do not recogn i se in Stanley tanleyon that manly Yignlic of the latt e r a the straightforward complete and triumphant answer to the subtlety of the former, we shall not envy him the clearness of his intellectual vision. Mr. Croker's speech was ingenious—it was humorous—in some in stances it amounted even to wit, and wit in the House of Commons is certainly not a drug in the market. But its ingenuity was displayed by blinking the real question, by shunning the general principle, and giving point and interest to immaterial and trifling circumstances which had nothing to do with the substantial merits of the case.- Let any man take the trouble of going through the heads of Mr. Croker's speech, and, if he find any one of them to embrace the principle of the measure, he will have made a discovery which others have attempted in vain. But listen to the admission of the Right lion. Gentleman himself—" He intended to have gone into more general topics, and to have urged more general ' reasons for opposing the Bill, but he feared to trespass loneer on the attention of the House, and must, therefore, draw to a conclusion." What simplicity, what candour, we have here ! And so it was only the want of time, anti the casual intrusion of unimportant topics, that prevented him from saying any thing upon the real question. We think too hiehly of Mr. Croker's talents to accept his apology in this instance. No, he knew too well where the pith and marrow of the question ley not to have ap plied him-elf to it fairly, if he could have done so with any effect; but, like the deserted Manager, he omitted the part of Harald, mule the Gravedigger his hero, and turned a philosophic drama into a farce. The speech was a very pleasant one to listen to, and it was quite delightful to see the tools of the boroughmongers shaking their sides with laughter as the joke proceeded ; bat what will the public say now that it is before them in print ? What can they say, but that a dextrous skirmisher, in doing all that he could do for his party conveniently, forgot his subject, and talked about every thing else? For our own parts we are of opinion that this speech, fairly considered, will do more injury to the cause of corruption, which it was intended to serve, than any that has been yet delivered from either side of the House. If it is only by a running fight of this kind, by a display of evasive pleasantry, that the great measure for which the heart of this great nation is beating ready to burst—if it is only by such means it can be opposed, even by men whose talents are of a high order—then, indeed, we may rest secure in the justice of our cause, and even join in the laugh, which must amuse, and cannot harm us.—Morning Herald. Poland has been sacrificed by the Governments of the only two great free States of Europe, as a propitiatory offering to the Holy Alliance. It is not worth while to divide the shame of this foul transaction, which covers Europe with infamy in the nineteenth century, and to apportion to France and En gland their respective shares of the disgrace with which history will brand the criminal weakness of their policy ; it is sufficient to know that the interests of France and England combined with the inte rests of civilization and humanity to make it the duty, as it ought to have been the desire, of the Governments of both nations to avert the calamity which proclaims the triumph of barbarism in the fall of Warsaw. What a triumph !--a triumph where all the glory is with the van quished, if, indeed, Poland be vanquished by this blow. Six mouths ago the immense hordes of the barbarian were at the gates of Warsaw, anticipating that the very appear :thee of their formidable array would have caused the dis persion of all the elements of Polish resistance. The courage of the Polish warriors soon disabused them of that error. The conqueror of Turkey, at the head of his ve teran legions, fled before the despised enemy, whom he came not so much to subdue as to chastise. The laurels of fam., which, till then, looked splendid in the eyes'of Europe, were torn from his brow, and he perished inglo trri:7usslye,ffitofrttsertolosrienpglaucepsuypa(r)dustohfe 60,t mu l a ne p u eo ii p i l t e h t e ha d t isa in s : tolerable yoke which they had dashed to the ground under the inspiration of suffering virtue, and with the strength of a holy despair. What Russian soldiership could not achieve, Russian intrigue, and the treachery of the infa mous abettors of Russia in some other States, has accom plished. Almost ever since the death of Diebitsch an ob scurity has tested on the movements, or rather the inaction, of the Polish Generals; aorie a mystery has covered _the affairs of Warsaw, up to the capture of the city, which time only can enable us to penetrate. That treachery has seen extensively at work we do not now for the first time affirm. It is some time since we ventured to condemn the Fabian tactics of the late General-in-Chief, as appearing to us to be exactly the opposite mode of conducting the war to what, in the rel itive circumstances of the contending parties, a sound judgment would have dictated. After those successful enterprises which had raised the confidence of the Polish soldier to a high pitch, and correspondingly dispirited the barbaa ian troops, he became comparatively inactive—permitted the desponding army of Diebitsch to be re-organised atter the loss of its Chief, without making any attempt to take advantage of its enfeebled condition— allowed the vast reinforcements of Russia to pour into Poland and concentrate, when they should have bean cut up in detail—and gave time to the Russian troops to re ' cover front their consternation, while the confidence of the Polish soldier proportionably declined. Perhaps the Polish Generalissimo and the Government of Warsaw were acting upon the advice which some Journals told us, some time aeo, they had received from the English and French Go vernments, not to risk a battle, as negociations were going on which would save Poland. If the Poles did receive that advice, and acted upon it, how treacherous it must h eve been, and how fa ally they have been deceived, the carnage and fall of Warsaw now make manifest to all the world.—Morning Herald. The Anti-Reformers claim for the system of corruption all the good which it cannot prevent. Thus because England, in spite of the prodigality of a Government carried on with a view to the profit of those who possess Parliamentary interest, has made great progress in arts tad industry, we are to infer that boroughmongering, and the heavy taxation to which it has subjected tl5, are the causes of all our improvements. When Admiral Col lingwiiod writes home, over and over Hg lin, that lie could obtain no promotion for skilful and brave officers, while he was overwhelmed with tintubers of palls, with no other merit than Parliamentary interest, and who not only burdened the country without serving it, hut, by hiein g promoted over meritorious officers, left them hopeless and broken-hearted, we are to infer that to Parliamentary in. terest we are indebted for the excellence of which it did not deprive our navy. As far as the system of corrup tion has extended influence, that influence has been most mischievous. The good that we possess, we owe to other causes, which have to a certain extent counteracted it. The speech of Mr. Croker on Tuesday night has been much extolled. We are not aware, however, that amidst all his appeals to the Aristocracy, and his criticism of the details ' of the Reform Bill, he advanced one single argument to show that we could only hope to enjoy the blessings of • good Government by investing a certain number of dividuals with the power of taxing the rest of the coin- munity, through the purchase of a comparatively stu ill portion of that community lay the produce of the taxes. • The Reform Bill has its defects; but it will not he ' reckoned among its defects that it gives less power to the ' payers of taxes over those who dispose of them, than they have hitherto enjoyed. Mr. Calker (skilfully, no doubt) avoided every thing like grappling with the principle on • which alone a fair representation can he opposed or de fended. A Government such as that which the Reform Bill is about to destroy, cannot long exist with an intel ligent people. We defy boroughtnongers to carry on the Government against the conviction of the people by means of corruption. The increasing resistance to such a Government must soon prove too great for its machinery. Every one knows that before the Reform Bill was intro duced, the boroughmongering system was falling to pieces irons the inadequacy of the means of corruption to meet the continually increasing resistance. The disgust of the people for the machinery was fed by the perusal of most the writers ho have become favourite i o f the peple. The inimitable w Fielding, for instan ce , n answer o to a Nobleman who asks whether any Minister could support himself on pure principles, and be able to baffle an oppo sition, unless he should oblige his friends by conferring places, often contrary to his own inclinations and his own opinion, observes that— " Whenever merit is liable to be su p erseded by favour and partiality, and men arc entrusted with offices without any regard to capacity or integrity, the allitirs of the State s ill always be hi a deplorable situation. There is another mischief which attends this kind of injustice—and that is, that it bath a manifest ten dency to destroy all virtue and all ability among the people, by taking away all that encouragement and incentive which should promote cumulation, and raise men to aim at excelling in any art, science, or profession. I will only add one argument more, and that is founded on the most narrow and selfish system of poli tics; and that is, that such a system is sure to create universal discontent and grmnbling at home ; for nothing can bring men to rest satisfied, when they see others preferred to them, but an opinion that they deserve that elevation. With what heart burnings, then, must any nation see themselves obli ged to con tribute to the support of a set of men, of whose incapacity to serve them they are well apprised, and who do their country a double disservice—by being themselves employed in posts to which they are unequal, and by keeping others out of those em ployments for which they are qualified." Mr. Ctoker, a man from 'the people, lends his throat to the Oligarchy. Ile is an ingenious man ; but will his speech in behalf of those by whom he has been pampered rally one disinterested man round the standard of Oli garchy? It is easy to persuade those who are in the possession of usurped power to retain it, but not so easy to persuade those who suffer from the usurpation to forego their rights. No sophistry can extinguish in men the de sire of living under a fair and equal Government. No sophistry can persuade them to pass sentence of incapacity on t h enm deeseeeto renounce for ever the right of controul- ing those who manage public affairs. The sophist may torture his ingenuity to perplex their understandings ; but the man who asserts the moral dignity of his fellows will at once reach their hearts. Let a military Croker at tempt to persuade the army, that interest and not merit should regulate promotion ; and let a Colonel Napier after wards address them in his glowing language, and we know what the result would be :—" Napoleon's troops fought in bright fields, where every helmet caught some beams of glory, but the British soldier conquered under the cold shade of Aristocracy ; no. honours awaited his daring, no despatch gave his name to the applauses of his country men ; his life of danger and hardship was uncheered by hope, his de ith unnoticed. Did his heart sink therefore? Did he not endure with surpassing fortitude the sorest of ills, sustain the most terrible assaults in battle unmoved, and with incredible energy overthrow every opponent? at all times proving, that while no physical military qualifica tion was wanting, the fount of honour was also full and fresh within him !" It would only be necessary in critical times to hold such language, to cut from under any aris tocracy which should persist in opposing the will of the nation the props on which they most confidently relied.- - Verb= sapienti. We were not a li•tle astonished that Mr. Croker, who advocates so strenuously the making the Peers the proprietors of the Commons, as the only secu rity for the existence of the former, should have made the allusion to the amalgation of the Peers, Commons, and Clergy of France at the revolution.—" He (Mr. Macau ley) must have known (said Mr. Croker) that France, in her ancient Constitution, possessed three estates, and when they met, the House of Peers went to their Chamber, and the House of Commons, as they might be called, retired to their's ; but the promoters of the revolution felt that to hive the Peers in the full possession of independent power would have the effect of defeating the project of the Revolution ; and the first attempt at Paris, as it would be the second in London, would be to intimidate the House of Peers into a servile compliance with the wishes of the other branches of the Legislature. The first project pro posed there was the union of the two branches of the Le gislature, in order to destroy the power of one of them. In the cise of England, it might be thought that the three hundred independent Peers, exercising a separate and sub stantive authority, might vet controul and successfully resist the ill-digested innovation of the Commons; but let the 658 get the 300 amongst them, and they would soon make short work with their less numerous opponents." This was an unfortunate instance. What is it that the people of England wish? That the Peers and the Com mons should he separate and distinct. What is it that the Anti Reformers wish ? that the Peers, not content with their own separate existence, should name a majority of the Commons ; that both Houses should in fact be Lords. The Anti.Refermers say, that if the Lords do not name a majority of the Commons, there can be no security for the separate existence of the Lords. The French Revolutionists said, we have a few of the Peers and many of the Clergy favourable to the views of ti e Tiers-Etas, and by bringing all into one Assembly we shall have a majority of votes. They wished the same ascendancy to the Commons which our Anti-Reformers wish to the Boroughmougering Peers. The Reformers, on the con trary, wish that Lords and Commons should confine them selves within their respective limits ; and the question is not now, shall the Peers preserve their own independence, but should they be allowed to retain the Commons in state of dependence? Resistance to the claims of the people to a fair representation, is transgressing their fair constitutional limits. It is but a poor argument to say, that justice should be withheld from the people, because, when they once obtain what is just, they may seek more than what is just. This point was well met by Mr. Stanley, who told Mr. Croker, " that the security for the stability of the Throne, and of the established institutions of the country, was the same as the security for the passing of the Bill ; it was the deep-rooted, heavy, and per severing force of public opinion." Certainly, without public opinion there can be no security ; and the argument of the Anti-Reformers implies a belief on their part, that the establishments of the country are not deserving of the support of public opinion. , Men do not subvert that of which they approves—Morning Chronicle. No less than 112,000,000 pounds of butter are annually consumed in London, chiefly made within 40 miles round the city. From the three counties of Cork, Cambridge, and Suffolk there are annually sent to the ca pital 210,000 firkins, amounting to 11,7601b5. It has been remarked by many great men, and among others by Mr. Fox, that the people of Great. Britain are unduly, and even weakly, attached to the aristocracy ; and it is a remarkable fact, that during the perpetually re curring discontents of the last forty years, the popular in dignation has 'seen always levelled against the House of Commons, and has never been pointed against the utility or existence of the Peerage.— Scotsman. Married, in St. Michael's church, Trenton, New Jersey, as Thursday, the 18th instant, by the Rev. Dr. BEASLEY, Prince LUCIEN MURAT, second eon of .10Acunt NIURAT, the late ex-King of Naples, to CARO LINE GEORGIANA, youngest daughter of the late Major THOMAS FRASER, of South Carolina.—New York Pa per, Aug. 24. EXTREME ECONOMY.—At a meeting of the Commissioners of Police in Edinburgh, Mr. CusttNlE moved that half the public Limps he extinguished during mootvight. After a long discussion the motion was rejected. SELECT VESTRY OF ST. JANIES . S.—A cor respondent informs us that a most unnecessary exp.nditure of the parish funds is now being made, in taking up a large surface of excellent pavement in Piccadilly, extend ing from the end of Sackville-street to Darby -court, and relaying with new stone, which our correspondent asserts himself and several of his neighbours believe to be inferior to what has been removed. SINGULAR BEQUEST.—AI the weekly Board of the Middlesex Hospital, held on Tuesday last, an ex tract from the will of THOMAS ATWELL, of Mitcham street, Marylebone, bricklayer, was read, whereby he be queathed his body to the Haspital for Oisseetion, and de sired that after the process had been completed, the re mains should be deposited in the garden of the Hospital ; and further bequeathed two houses in aid of the funds of the Hospital. At the request of the friends of the de ceased, the Board conseuted to give up their claim to the body. TAxATIONILLUSTRATED.—The magnitude and severity of our taxation may he illustrated by a few comparative facts. The gin and whiskey (British spirits) which exhilirate John Bull, yield a sum to the Govern ment equal to the revenue of the Spanish monarchy; the tax levied on the beer, which slakes his thirst, exceeds the revenue of Bavaria—he pays as much on the tea which re freshes his wife, as Fgaticts the First draws from six mil lions of Neapolitans—as much neatly on the sugar which sweetens it, as twelve millions of Americans pay on all objects whatever—as much on the stinking tobacco which gratifies his depraved appetite, as four millions of Italians pay to CLIA IMES FELIX—as much on the soap that washes his hands, as suffices to support the Pope, with all his soldiers, cardinals, priests, and their mistresses—as much for the privilege of having daylight in his house as would fill the coffers of the King of 1-I.a.NovEß—and finally, the taxes levied on his thirst alone, as it variously inclines to brandy, rum, whiskey, beer, or wine, exceeds the money paid by fifty millions of Russians for the blessings of pater nal despotism !—Scotsman. Messrs. COLBURN and BENTLEY have just published the following interesting Travels Major the Hon. George Keppel's Journey to Constantinople Across the Balcan," 2 vols. Svo. with Maps and Plates. " Interesting information, entertaining anecdote, and clear description, vary every page."—Literary Gazette. 2. 4:L a nder's Wanderings in Africa," 2 vols. post Svo. with Portrait and other Plates. " This work is replete with information respecting the strange habits of the interior African Tribes."—Morning Post. 3. " Sir Arthur Brooke's Travels in Spain and Morocco," 2 vols. Svo. with Plate , "An animated description of parts of Africa and Sp a i n , the present stat e of whi c h was littl e known:— , S P /r a t i o n :tan/. 4. " Hughes's Travels in Greece and Al bania," 2 vols. Svo. with great a dditi ons , and 33 Plates, price - "A hook of stand ar d re f ere nce in classical studies, which no reader of Homer, Hesiod, and Pindar, or of the Greek dramatists or historians, will he without." —Globe. 5. " Captain Alexander's Travels through Russia, the Crimea, &c." 2 vols. Svo. with 20 Plates. " Information could not be presented in a p leasanter form than in this young officer's travels." — Sp ectut or. "Mrs. Colonel Ellwood's Travels O verland to I ndia." 2 vols. Svo. with Plates. " She delig hts us al l in her de. s criptions."—Monthly Review. 7 . " Burckhardt's Tra vels among the Bedouins a nd Wabab y s," 2 vols. Svo. pr i c e 28s. " This work has done much towards eluci dating the real condition of the Arahians."—Ediriburgh Review. - head, that and the l ln t : T O ib t o l : el e i . er n boa t evi e num b er of deaths was a little over 200. firnotmhisocuityr during g ua th ry e last week was e ds r e a ea g et e hns weekly number through the year is There was one week last year, and also in A a: t helB6 )332:y9""tte:t there is no prevailing disease among us, same, we believe, is true of all our eities.....New Yorh ,for4rnol, Aug. 24. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF COMMONS, SEPTEMBER 2i. The House met at Half-past Three o'clock, but in consequence of the ballot upon the petition against the return for the city of Dublin, the gallery was not opened until nearly Half-past Four o'clock. The Committee, after being sworn, proceeded to their room. The House was unusually full of Memberi. THE CASE OF MR. AND MRS. DEACLE. Colonel EVANS presented petitions from Manchester, Warwick, Winchester, and a place in the county of Suffolk, praying the House to institute an investigation into the case of Mr. and Mrs. Deanle. MESSAGE FROM THE LORDS. The Deputy Usher of the Black Rod appeared at the Bit-, and summoned the House to the Bar of the House of Lords, to hear the Royal Assent given by Commission to various Bills. The Speaker, accompanied by a number of 111-tubers, accordingly left the House, and on their re turn the former read a list of Bills (for which see our Lords' report) to which the Royal Assent had been given. Mr. LITTLETON presented two petitions —one from almost ail the clergy of the Archdeaconry of Stafford, and the other from the Clergy, chief constables, and inhatii_ tants of 13urslem, in the county of SiafforiL They stated that very bad effects were produced from the operation of the New Beer Bill, and prayed an investigation, with the view of causing an alteration to be made in the law. The Hon. Member stated that he wds not one who believed that the new Bill had been productive of the mischiefs that had been stated, but he thotuAt that petitions coming from such a quarter as the Clergy, who had the best opportunity of forming opinions upon the subject, deserved the consi deration of the House. After a few words from Sir Jacob Astley, Sir R. Vy vyan. Mr. O'Connell, Mr. Littleton, Mr. Warburton, Mr. Hunt, and other Members, the petitions were ordered to he printed. Mr. HUNT presented a petition from Huddersfieh►, signed by nearly 4,000 persons, praying the House to take steps to prevent prosecution . for expressing religious or po political opinions, and complaining of the imprisonment of the Reverend Robert Taylor, Mr. Richard Carhie, and Mr. Carpenter. It also complained of the proses clitions being at the instance of a self elected society, railed " The Society for the Suppression of Vice,"—a so ciety which usurped the privilege of the Attorney-General, and which, in his (Mr. Hunt's) opinion, was a public nui sance. The petitio❑ prayed for the abolition of the laws upon which the prosecutions against the persons now in custody for expressing their 'opinions were founded, and also fur a Bill of Indemnity, by which those persons might be liberated. [During the speech of the Hom Member, Lord John Russell entered the House, and taking up the Reform Bill, which had been lying on the table, left the House to carry it to th, House of Lords. We should suppose, that not less than 400 Members were in the House, but upon see ing the Noble Lord walk out with the Bill, a general rush took place, and not less than SOO followed his Lordship to the bar of the House of Lords. In less than a minute the House (in which there had just previously been such a buzz as could only be equalled by that which usually prevails on the Royal Exchange shortly before the close of business), became so quiet that a pin might almost be heard to drop.] • After the petition presented by Mr. HuNr had been disposed of, Colonel EVANS rose, in pursuance of notice, to move for a Select Committee to inquire into the case of Mr. and Mrs. Deacle. The Hon. Member wished to avoid a discussion upon the subject at the present time, and he therefore at once made the motion. Mr. WILKS seconded the motion. Mr. F. BARING said he would he happy in every pos sible way to afford every facility t o th e Committee. . _ Lord ALTHORP had no doubt of the readiness of the Hon. Member to have this care gone into, but the whole of the particulars having been already gone into before a judicial tribunal, he felt it his (Inv to say that an investigation by this House would be attended with in convenience to the pul.lic business, and therefore he should oppose the motion.—( Hear, hear.) Mr. HUME thought there must be some mistake in this matter, for the Hon. Member for Thetford had expressed his desire for the Committee on a former night. He (Mr. Hume) thought that the matter should be enquired into, more particularly as there was an implied understanding the other night that this motion would not be opposed. Lord ALTHORP recommended the withdrawing of the motion, with d view of remodelling it or of adjourning the debate. The motion was ultimately withdrawn. WHITE-BOY ACTS. Mr. STANLEY moved for leave to bring in a Bill to amend the 15th end 16th of George 111., commonly called the White-Boy Acts. The Right Hon. Gentleman explained that his object was to change the punishment of death, which was generally applied to off aces under the White-Boy Acts, to the punishment of transportation. He did not do it so much out of humanity, as from a con viction that it would render the Act more efficacious. There were certain offences also punished by death if committed by night, which were only misdemeanours if committed by day, and he wished to apply the punishment of transportation to both. The Right Hon. Gentleman also gave notice that it was not his intention, considering the present state of the session, to bring forward the Bill for consolidating the laws relative to the importation and possession of arms in Ireland, of which he bad previously given notice. He meant to move, however, to revive for the year, the Act as to keeping arms which had just ex pired, and next year to bring forward the Bill to consoli date all these laws. Mr. O'Connell, Mr. North, Sir J. Newport, and Mr. H. Grattan, severally expressed their concurrence in the measure proposed. Alter t; few words from Mr. SHAW, leave was given to bring in the Bill. Mr. STANLEY postponed until Thursday next his motion for leave to bring in a Bill to amend the GraLd Jury Laws of Ireland. SUGAR REFINING ACT. Mr. BURGE requested the Noble Lord to postpone the bringing up the report on this Act until Wednesday next, as the attendance of Members was at that moment much too small to allow the motion on this important subject of which he (Mr. Burge) had given notice, to receive ade- quate consideration. He hoped, however, that, alter what had already taken place, the Noble Lord would not persist in pressing the Bill. Lord ALTHORP had already declared the subject was under inquiry, and that the Bill was to be in force for lily one year. 'I he Government did not intend to abandon it. The report was then postponed till Wednesday next. IRISH REFORM BILL. In answer to a question from Mr. NORTH, it was stated by Mr. STANLEY, that the Government did not intend to move the second reading of the Reform Bill until Tues day next. - Mr. O'CONNELL, in consequence of this announce ment, subsequ.ntly postponed the call of the House from Friday till next Tuesday. The Inclosure Acts' Tithes' Bill was re-committed, and several amendments being agreed to, it was ordered to be read a third time on Monday. PORTUGAL. Mr. COURTENAY having complained of delay in the production of papers ropecting Portugal, which he had moved for three weeks aeo, Lord PALAIERSTON said that they would be liid on the table of the house the moment they were finished ; but it required some time to make copies of a number of doeuments, and to select those which were required out of a mass of public papers. STAMP DUTIES. Mr. O'CONNELL moved for a return of all the pro secutions for a violation of the laws respecting the stamps of newsp 'pers.— Ordered. Mr. HUME presented a petition from Eleanor the wife of Edward Windt's, complaining that her husband had been persuaded by a pi-rson, who proved to be a policeman in disguise, to sell him a copy of Berth°ld's Political Letter ; and that for this offence he hid been sentenced to three months' imprisonment in the House of Correction by the Magistrates of Marlborough-street.--The petition was ordered to be printed. Mr. HUNIE then moved for a copy of the order of commitment.—Nlotion agreed to. Lord POLLINGTON moved that Lord Mexborough should be allowed leave of absence for one month, on the ground of urgent private business. Mr. O'CONNELL opposed the motion, as he did not think business a sufficient apology for absence at such a moment.—Motion withdrawn. An HON. MEMBER then moved that Mr. Davies Gilbert have leave of absence on the most urgent private business. right to Say, M r . D. Gil . —and s t a t e d t h at t h e Another HoN. MEMBER said he did not see how th ey ber A t i h r. ad ° c ' could grant this when they refused the leave of absence to Lord Mexborough. business was of the most pressing nature, which demanded his immediate attention. ComoeNNtoEhLinaLlh(oAugliatuigth Mr, ROBINSON remarked on the inconsistency of the o~~" Member for Kerry (Mr. O'Connell) opposing the MI!? The question was put, and, being opposed, Lion, and agreeing to the othe r on p r ecisely the earner 0 s tranger° ordered to withdraw. The motion was then withdrawn, and leave of O cc to Mr. Gilbert consequently refused. ..l o ck , The House adjourned at a Quarter-past Eight o P 9g , HOUSE OF LORDS, SEPTEgaI I The Royal Assent was given by Commission to O c t o; lowing Bills :—Commissioners of Accounts (Ireland)reov Public 'Works (Great Britain) Bill; Canadian gem" Bill ; Hackney-coaches Bill ; Land-Tax Doabl e cool ments Bill; Turnpike Tolls Regulation Bill ; Clare itcol Presentments 13111; Saint Alb in's and South M ulls 01/ Bill ; Crewe's Estate Bill ; Kinnaird's Divorce,ool/1 Flathmann's Naturalization Bill.—The Conlo ° ' ,(0§ were the Loan CHANCELLOR, the Duke of RI O and the Earl of SHAFTESBURY. 1 0 In expectation of the bringing up of the Refo rm lot the Hons., was crowded both above and below t be more than it has been this S,Ssion. tY A few minutes after Five o'clock, a Message fro 10, Commons was announced, when the LORD CHAl 4c , sl ' , ls put the question " that the Messengers be called ', a ' ,11! a clear voice, while not a whisper was to be heard House. Lord JOHN RUSSELL, accompanied by all the Pr fi mo tt Members of the H o u se of Commons, who in nutribo'gr than filled the space below the bar, brought up t b ,, f s form Bill, and desired the concurrence of their Lor a '" —(When these words were uttered, several ;Vent"'" the Commons cried " Hear, hear.") The LORD CHANCELLOR then announce: l t"` e il amidst the most p ro f oun d s il e nc e .—L o rd Grey no t present, the Bill was laid on the table. Tue Waterloo Bridge-street Bill was read a third 6° : and passed. 'o4' Lord Teuterden's Limitation of Prescription 13 11- through Committee. , •id The Bishop of BRISTOL said, if tile Bill pas 0 " 1 :01 present loran the Clergy would be surprised. Teo i r he would move as an amendment, to secure th:roo• pointtnent ,if a new incumbent previously to the con tw ' tion of bonuses of 60 years stanfling. • 00 After a few words from Lord ELnoN and the 13V4 of Lolinots . , which were indistinctly heard at the b lf ' the amendments were agreed to.—Reported to-roorro*l' ItEFORAI BILL. 0 Earl GREY then rose. Every eye was fi%e ec o. him, and the most intense anxiety seemed to P i t ' b if urinate throughout the whole House. His Lau` bo stated that although he had not been present A f t the Bill was brought up from the Commons, entitled an 0 0 to amend the representation of the people in the a ft erO n House of Parliament, he wo u ld n o w move that, as 5 tn ,,l t y of form, it 15 wo uld should be read a first time. He "n, lu „ if that motion was acceded to without a tlivime"; would then be for their Lordships to aPr ip oit day for h av i ng i t read a second time. In an doing, t Lordships, he trusted, while they consulted their owi! ,,ht ,if venience, would appo i nt an ear l y d ay — t hi s d a y se'enirit it were convenient ; I.e should say, probably Mond# p ion night.—(Herr, hear, and general marks of appre tn ' e se from both sides of th e House.) He would therefore root Monday se'nnight for the second reading, presuming that would suit the entire convenience of the House' 011 The LORD CHANCELLOR—" I move that thi:cor, be read a first time. Those that are of this opinion eat , o t , tent '—those of the contrary opinion say, ' Non-ee n- v e. The Contents h ave it."—Th e Bill was then read a fir st t!t v Earl GREY then rose and said—ln moving that 1 13 0 printed, I will express my firm hope that, if th i6 ,,e , passes the second reading on Monday se'rtnight, no n tte f lions will b e o ff ere d b y N o bl e L or d s go i ng i nto GOO with the least delay possible. t Lord SEAFORD presented two petitions againg" Warrington Railway Bill. BELGIUM. A,s 6 5 ' The Marqui s o f LONDONDERRY, w h o was •ce guished by a large bouquet of geranium, gave n fit that it was his intention, on Monday next, to P li ";Ir ther questions to th e N o bl e E ar l at t h e h ea d o f log Jesty's Gover nmen t re l at i ve to t h e present state of affairs in Belgium. Ott The Bills on the table were then forwarded a stage , which the Lord Chancellor resumed the hearing of aPPP- THE MARKETS. COUNTRY CORN MARKETS DURING THE W Per Quarter. Abingdon Andover Birmingham- ISritiport Cireiicester Faringdon, Guildford ; 4 enley. Hereford High worth -- -... llaidenhead Monmouth---. Heading Southampton Stroud..~ Tewkesbury ......... Uxbridge —...--.... Wantage.w.,—.... Warminster ........... Wind50r.........—..... Worcester] Wheat. s. to s. 31 43 37 41 22 40 32 39 38 44 36 40 28 32 30 35 44 48 32 42 32 46 31 47 32 34 37 40 31 38 40 42 32 38 30 43 23 28 36 8. to s. E. 0. 30 .... - - 2-I 39. - 5 1 - 26 30 -- 4 6 24 9.9 F 9.6 38 -- '26 35 4 1 ; 9.0 30 •••• 4u 28 :4 20 33 -- - 4 4 21 32 -4 4 - 29 32 -- 28 a 2.. 22 32 30 38 24 34 41 21 30 -- . 25 39 -- '2l 2 24 2S 1 """ ' ' ' • ....- LEWES MAIt K LT.—Sept. 20. ° White Wheat (per quarter)—......£3 6 oto £3 10 0 Red ditto Barley...—. l5 0 117 0 Oats, New --..... 1 1 0 1 4 ° 0 Pea5e—......... ..—......... 1 14 0 1 1... ,,,, d Oil Cake, New......................—..... 12 0 0 per theu3312,./ HULL 111 A RKET—Sept. 20. ,g bt" Wheat, Old —s N , Nis. 64 , 5. Now •••.-•••-• Forei gn —a. 50s. 54c ln bond._ —s. --s• f ps , Oats, Poland — s . 24 5 . 28 s . Old ~......S. ~, Small or Feed.... —s. 245. 2los __,. --s. 2 - Foreign —s. 205. 21s —c. ....s. 4 , 1 , ' Barley, Norf. & Sut ... —s 40s. 425. Line. & Vold —s. 36 - 944 , Foreign , — S . or2s: 0. Beans 3Ss. 40s. 425. Foreign a ITS , ...• • , 4 Pease, White... —a. 465. 48s. Grey ....../. r4p. Tares —s -.-•,. —s. Foreign —s. '3 o '• "4, Rapeseed, in kond none. Free, per last —l. =______j'i-'' LEEDS CORN M A RKET.—Sept. 20. Wheat, Norfolk and Suffiilk, fiOlb. sls. tof f ' , ' - York. and Lincoln. (lOib. Barley, Norfolk and Suffolk -- Yorkshire and Lincolnshire Grinding Beans Oats, Potatoe —dealing, 1'0r..P.2c1. to Shelling Rapeseed, English, 164 to 2•11 LIVERPOOL CORN EXCHANGE.—Sept. O• q , 0 WHEAT, English, White, p e r 70th. Red 8 Scotch, Welch, and Manx 7 6 1 Irish, White 7 0 It Red Foreign 8 4 9 3 OATS, English, Welsh, and Scotch, ver 4511, 3 4 Irish 1 "---". 3 IItl. C N , , '2 9 0 Matting, per Imp. quarter 36 0 4( , ) , 0 Scotch and Irish, per 6011,• 3lO 4 0 Feeding 3 10 0 6 BEANS, English, per Imperi a l quar t er 42 0 4 ~ 0 Irish, &c. Foreign PEAsz, English, per Imperial qua rt e r Foreign l5 0 49 0 FLOUR, English, per 280 lb. Irish OATMEAL, English and Irish, per 2101bs 26 0 27 0 ~ 0 INDIAN CORN, per 4401 b. 32 0 •'" :43 0 31 0 lye, per Imperial quarter MALT, per Imperial quarter IMPORT OF GRAIN for the Week ending Sept. 19. o wl , Wheat.' Oats. I Barley Flour. ( l at Lif , ~F . ; , ,5 .2 i t! ,t r 3 s. o , iir o s. IFore ss ig , n, BrliLllnsh 46 & 4 c. s Scks.lLi a „ 031.3, CHELTENHAM Per Buz.hel s. d. to s. d, Wheat Barley oats 4O 43 Beans Pease 5 0 7 0 A RKET.—Sept. lb. a. d. to 6 Bccf 5 C Mutton , ti Veal Pork Lawb . Hay On the 19th inst. at ( 13 1 1 d OI :s R O T i t :- i r ig o 3S I :i d 521 Ken 1341 °I W. W. Taylor, Esq., of a son. a W S On the 19tH in s t . at G o ldi ng t on , B e dford, the lady of —• grave, Esq., of a SOll. MARRIED. 1 1 ,..r . ' On the 20th i ns t . a t St. George', Hanover-square j te stop, Esq., b arr i s t er , t o M ary J ane , only daughter of the 1 3 W On B the . oys, 20th Esq. inst. at Ha Post Catain R. N. 3t Hack ne cky, Charles, eldest ssn 0f thee[ C. 11. Hanc. ek, Esq., of Clapton, to Harriett, second dal l e of Francis de Berckem, Esq., of Springfield, ClsptonlL doo't On the 19th inst. at St. George's, Hanover-square, Bru t ri ,igh' Esq., of B roxmore-par k, Wilt s hi re , t o Sophi a , youngest ter of J. Twine, Esq. of Ramsbury. , „ r ick. On the 17th inst. at Stoke Newington, Eglintoun Freo`ote second son of T. Ross, Esq., of the General Post-office , tc :„,,;,. line Jane, eldest surviving daughter of the late Rev. T. On the 14th inst. at Llanbadern, Aberystwyth, the o ,ij og Lewellin, D.C. L. Principal of St. David's College, and ESO t bir‘l Chaplain of the Lord Bishop of St. David's, to Caro line, daughter of G. Smith, Esq. of Plumptre-house, Nottingh am ' of Foelallt, Cardiganshire. In July last, in the island of Barbacloes, Hampden C1 , Z.j, 41 " Esq., to Philippa, the eldest daughter of ld „,, leyne, Bart. DIED. On the 18th inst. at Crediton, Devonshire, aged : 4 " , ,,i c ee Mana Dunbar Rudall, daughter of 0. Rudall, Esq. an" Sir W. R. Dunbar, Bart. of Mochrum. On the 19th inst. of apoplexy, whilst en a visit to ",•ik, law, General Sir John Buchan, K..C.f3. Colonel Mark the Portland-place, and Kirby, in the Isle of Man, Colone' } 'ear; Madras Army, late Governor of St. Helena, and rna'Y resident in the Mysore. - - -------, A T TOO PRINTED AND PUBLISDni BY NURDO YOUNLis SUN OFFICE, 112, STsoin, LoNDO, ~~ Alt. tti Ni" 0] m; .ro rn 1 1)nti r , g ; , furmel i descent i: t J ust p 111 O n tile a ;rte4 thgesti Adiir P r i, I IY th Ti (Irl t, Lo,