The Sun. — London, England, 1842-04-21 00:00:00

VbErbf EVitton SUN-OFFICE, Seven o'Cioclt. ELECTION COMMITTEES. (THIS DAY.) (Continued from our Afternoon Edition.) WAKEFIELD. The scrutiny having been gone into, the Committee pro ceeded to strike off a sufficient number of votes from the poll of Mr. Holdsworth, to place Mr. Lascelles in a majority, and then came to the following resolutions : " That at the last election for the borough of Wakefield, Joseph Holdsworth, Esq., was not duly elected, and ought not to have been returned. " That the Hon. W. Sebright Lascelles was duly elated, and ought to have been returned. , " That neither the petition, nor the opposition to the peti tion, was frivolous or vexatious." IPSWICH. The Committee proceeded to-day with their investigation. The room uas so crammed with persons from the borough, every one of whom seemed to have an intense personal interest in each and all of the details, that it was with the utmost diffi culty the reporters for the press could make their way in and out. Some arrangement ought to be made by the Committee to keep a passage open. The examinations are infinitely more important to the people of Ipswich, particularly since the re port of the Sudbury Committee, than the discussions on the tariff and the Income-tax, but they would not. concern the general reader. QUEEN'S BENCH-(THIS DAY.) BREWS V. JORDAN, Mr. PLATT moved for a rule to show cause why the ver di c t had in this case, should not he set aside. The case was tried in London before Lord Denman, and a verdict of Jul. was entered for the plaintiff. The plaintiff and defendant were both travelling in the same carriage from Blackwall, and on their arriving at London Mr. Brees gave the defendant into the custody of a policeman for smoking in the carriage, which is contrary to the bye-laws of the Railroad Company. Mr. Jordan was taken to the police station at the l%Jinories, and denied the charge, and on demanding the name of the person who gave him in charge. Mr. Brees, who accompanied him to the station, refused to give his name. Mr. Drees then said that he would not press the charge and was leaving the station-house. when Mr. Jordan desired the police-constable not to all ow th e p l a i nt iff to go t ill h e gave hi s name, which he still refused to do, though he was asked sixty or seventy titres. He was then taken into custody by the police, for which he brougl,t his action against Mr. Jordan and the police, and the Jury brought in a verdict of 151. against the parties, Mr. Platt now contended that the verdict was not properly given..—Role nisi granted. THE I NISH BAR. MEETING OF THE IRISH LAW STUDENTS IN LONDON. A meeting of the Irish law students at present in London, was held in the Crown and Anchor Tavern on Tuesday evening last, for the purpose of taking into consideration the provisions of " a Bill to amend the Laws regulating the admission of Barristers in Ireland," introduced into Parliament by Sir Valentine Blake. The Chair was taken at eight o'clock by Mr. F. L. Smith. The CHAIRMAN having explained the objects of the meeting, Mr. M. J. MARTYN, who was requested to act as Se cretary, said that the Committee of Irish Law Students in London, of which he was a member, totally disap proved of the measure introduced by Sir Valentine Blake. They had determined to oppose it in every stage ; and, with that view, a petition was prepared for presentation to the House of Commons, pointing out the monstrous anomalies and absurdities of the Bill ; and at the same time praying a modification of the pre sent system. The Committee had deputed him (Mr. Martyn) and the Chairman to wait on Sir Valentine Blake, to remonstrate with him, and to ascertain from what source he had received instructions to bring in such a measure, but they were unable to obtain any clue to the originators of the matter, Sir Valentine Blake having only stated that he had received instructions from a " number of law students." It was obvious that the present system was absurd in the extreme. No doubt advantages might be derived from students coming over to London, but there should be no compul sion—it should be optional; and if theywere to be obliged to keep terms in London, they should be obliged to avail themselves of those advantages which it was said they could have there. Nothing could be more absurd—no thing more unreasonable—than the provision of the Bill now under consideration of the House of Commons, that eight years were necessary to enable men to ac complish in Ireland what might be done in England in three years. The statutes by which the present system was regulated were passed at a period when the practice of the Irish Courts did not afford students the means of qualifying themselves for their profession, and at a time, too, when other motives beside made it appear po litic to compel Irish students to resort to English Inns of Court; but the necessity for these laws had long ceased to exist—the Irish Courts now affording every means for a complete tlegal education, the Irish bar being as eminent for learning and ability, and the Irish Judges being, according to the admission of all parties, as distinguished for their decisions as their brethren in England.—(Hear, hear.) In addition to all that, the continuance of the present system stamped the Irish bar with an unjust mark of inferiority, which their legal acquirements and character in no degree warranted; and it exacted from the Irish students nearly double the amount of fees and stamp duties payable by those whose intention it was to be called to the English bar ; for that there was no advantage conferred upon the Irish student, except forsooth the privilege of going into a pleader or conveyancer's chambers, for which he was again victimised. That profession, like all others, re quired a certain amount of protection ; it was not sought to annihilate that protection ; it was not desired to increase the facilities, nor was it requisite to increase the restrictions, in order to meet the views of those who were in favour of an abolition of the present system, but the object was to rediodel the existing system, and sub stitute in its stead one less remarkable for antiquated absurdity, and one which would be calculated to confer advantages upon the body at large. The CHAIRMAN regretted that time did not permit the London Committee to await the reply to communica tions despatched to the law students in Ireland, whose co-operation it was desirable to have, in order the more effectually to oppose the present bill. It was unnecessary for him to expose the absurdities of the present system, as every law student was sensible of them. the Bill now under consideration - of the House, while it pretended to remove the abuses of which they complained, had only the effect of perpetuating, if not aggravating, them under another form. The Chairman then entered into the de tails of the bill itself, and in a very able and eloquent manner elucidated its injustice, contradictions, and absurdities. Mr. MARTYN then brought forward the petition which, protesting against Sir V. Blake's Bill, prayed that the Legislature should repeal the Acts of 33d Hen. VIII. and 11th Elizabeth, and that it should be enacted in their stead that all fit persons should be hereafter permitted to practice as barristers in Ireland, who had graduated at one of the Universities of Great Britain or Ireland, and who had entered as Irish students any of the Inns of Court of Great Britain or Ireland, and served therein twelve terms, who, not having graduated as, any Univer sity, should have, in lieu thereof, paid as an equivalent such additional amount of fees and served such additional number of terms as to the Legislature might seem fit; and further that the right of all students, now in any stage of their course of preparation fur the Irish bar, should not be affected by any alteration of the present system. Mr. WHITE expressed his entire concurrence in the observations which had been made, and his approbation of the petition, which was calculated to convey the opinions and meet the views of the Irish law students in general; he had therefore much pleasure in moving that it be adopted, and entrusted for presentation to the Right Hon. Frederick Shaw, and that the Right Hon. the Lord Mayor of Dublin, the Solicitor-General for Ireland, and other Irish Members, should be requested to support its prayer. Mr. DEARING having seconded the resolution, Mr. DUGGAN moved as an amendment, that Sir V, .Blake should be remonstrated with, and the objection nble nature of his Bill pointed out to him by a deputation appointed for that purpose, before any petition should 'be adopted or presented to Parliament upon the subject «)t* it. Mr. MARTYN stated, that ho should be most anxious to -act with the utmost courtesy towards Sir Valentine •Blake, but the course suggested by the proposer of the amendment, was totally unnecessary, as Sir Valentine Blake had been apprised immediately after the first reading of this Bill of the evils which existed in the pre sent system, and of the remedies calculated to remove them. The Hon. Baronet had then an opportunity to act 'von those suggestions, but he did not seem to regard th e m; it appeared he was solely influenced by the repre sentations of some nameless individual or some few un :known persons, who had the audacity to impose upon - him by representing the opinions of the body of the law students at large, manifestly without any authority whatever.—The amendment was withdrawn. A discussion then arose as to the Member who should be requested to present the petition, but it was ultimately 'greed upon that Mr. Sergeant Murphy (Member fur Cork) should be requested to present it, and that a de putation from that meeting should be appointed to wait upon Mr. O'Connell, Mr. Shaw, and other Irish Mem bers, for the purpose of securing their opposition to the Bill. Mr. DILLox having been called to the Chair, Mr. O'Dwyca said he was convinced that that meet ;niiand the I r i s h law students in general, felt deeply ebted to Mr. Smyth for his indefatigable zeal to pro mote their interests. lle had therefore great pleasure i n proposing a vote of thanks to him. The proposition was u n animously ad o p ted, and the meeting then ad [The second reading of the Bill above alluded to was moved by Sir Valentine Blake last night in the H o u se of Commons, and negatived without a division.] DECISION IN THE CASE OF THE FRENCH POST-OFFICE AGAINST VIVIER, ONE OF THE COURIERS OF THE LONDON MORNING PAPERS• /3011L01NE, APRIL 19.-7 his case, which excited so much interest on Wednesday last, and attracted such a crowd of spec tators, on account of the great orator who pleaded the defence, has just been decided against the Courier. It appears this cause has, at the same time, excited the most unprecedented severity in the conduct and judgment of the French authori ties, as regards the carr yi ng o f l e tt ers , &c., for, independent of ;he condemnation of the Courier, to pay a fine of 150 f. (about 61.) the same penalty has been inflicted upon an English lady who arrived by the mail packet on the 3d inst. Two letters having been found in her pocket-bock. Capt. Wing field, of the Emerald, London steamer, was also fined the same sum for brini n g a letter di rec t e d t o a s hi p- b ro k er , w h o is the agent in Boulo g ne to the Commercial Steam-packet Company. It i, highly important this severity sh Lc ma. known to the public, to prevent such serious con,tquenees tu lire nulbe runs English who are now beginning to come to Boulogne, Br.c. I have now only to add the judgment, as pronounced this day, by M. Dessaux, the President, and of which the following is the translation. _ . againt the alteration proposed by the new tariff with respect to the importation of live stock. INCOME TAX. Mr. P. SCROPE presented a petition from Stroud, against the Income-tax. Mr. BYNG presented a similar petition from 'lam mersmith. Mr. EWART presented a similar petition from Annan. Sir R. IL INGLIS presented a petition from the Church Society of Shepton Mallett, praying for in creased church accommodation. Mr. SCOTT presented a petition against the Income tax. I will endeavour to send also the French copy. Considering that it results from instructions that Vivier transported from Paris to Boulogne, and remitted to Mr. Barry, of the Marine Hotel, a dispatch of the weight of 355 grammes, and addressed to Mr. Marsh, Dover. Considering that the Article 1 of the decision of the Consuls, of the •27th Prairial, in the year 9, forbids every person who is not in the service of the Post-office, to interfere or meddle with the transport of letters, journals, pamphlets, &c., of the weight of one kilogramme (about 21b. ), or less. Considering that this disposition is general and absolute, and makes no dis tinction between those who act contrary to the prohibition which it establishes. Mr. BOWES presented a petition from Durham, against the proposed alteration in the duty on the im portation of live stock. Lord G. SOMERSET brought up the Report of the Committee of Selection. LICHFIELD ELECTION. The following Members were . appointed to try the merits of the petition complaining of the undue return for the borough of Lichfield, viz., Mr. Dundas, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Bellew, Mr. Mars) all, the Hon. F. Scott, Mr. Fitzroy, and Mr. E. Divett, Chairman. SOUTHAMPTON ELECTION. The following Members were appointed to try the merits of a petition complaining of an undue return for the borough of Southampton, viz., Mr. R. Curties, Mr. Godson, Mr. W. 0. Stanley, Mr. Bucke, Mr. Hutt, Mr. Wiltshire, and Mr. Redington. MEDICAL CHARITIES BILL. An HoNe MEMBER wished to ask the Noble Lord, the Socretary for Ireland, whether, in the Medical Charities' Bill, which he was about to introduce, he intended to in sert a clause to provide for the government and support of county infirmaries. Lord ELIOT said he had no such intention at pre sent ; but if, in the discussion, he found the majority of Irish Members in favour of such a clause, he would be disposed to accede to their wish. IPSWICH ELECTION—CASE OF LUCAS. Mr. RIGBY WASON wished to drew the attention of the House to the petitions of Obadiah Barwich Lucas, who had been committed to Newgate for prevari cation, before the Ipswich Election Committee. It was stated in the petition that the wife of the prisoner was ill, and that the prisoner him self had been in a very distressed state since 1837. He moved that it be referred to the Ipswich Election Committee, and he hoped the House would assent to the proposition. If the Committee now wished to examine this man they could not do so without applying to the Speaker for his warrant. Now it was most desirable that this man should be examined before Com mittee, as he had stated he could and would give them most important information. He hoped the House would assent to his • motion, and he would therefore move that the petition of Obadiah Bar wick Lucas be referred to the Select Committee appointed to consider the merits of the petition complaining of an undue election for Ipswich. Mr. PAKINGTON, as Chairman of the Ipawich Elec tion Committee, felt called upon to state his reasons for opposing the motion of the Hon. Gentleman opposite, but before he did he wished to allude to a circumstance to which, had he not been called upon to address the House on the subject of this petition, he should not have thought it worth his while to have alluded, he meant a letter signed by the Hon. Member for Ipswich, which had appeared in tqe Morning Chronicle, and he only alluded to it to express his surprise that the Hon. Member, after speaking to him (Mr. Pakington) in the library of the House, to induce him to enter into a brief conversation, should without consulting him (Mr. Packington) on the subject, publish a report of that con versation in the morning papers.—(Cheers.) He (Mr. Packington) would not allude to that subject further than to say that he denied the accuracy of that report. The petitioner applied to be discharged on two grounds, one of which was the bad health of his wife. He had thought it his duty to consult the Committee on those two points, and he had to state it as t h e i r unan i mous opinion, that they could not think of again examining him. With regard to the two questions, or any other claim he might have to be discharged from Newgate, he spoke the opinion of the majority of the Committee, when he stated that that opinion remained entirely un changed. The Committee had beenplaced in very pain ful and difficult circumstances, the petitioners having to substantiate their case by evidence taken from among the political partizans of the opposite party, many of whom were of the lower classes of society ; the consequence was, that there was a great deal of prevarication and unwilling giving of evidence, in some cases apparent perjury. The Committee had been forced in several instances to caution the witnesses severely how they gave their evie dence, and that if they persevered its such conduct, the Committee would be compelled to resort to the powers with which It was invested. After repeated cau tions, this witness was guilty of repeated prevarica tions, and the case was all the worse from the respectability of the party. The indignation TA* the Com mittee had been very great on finding a person filling the situation of innkeeper, charged with corrupting others. He had been guilty, in four several ine stances, of self-contradictio n , con fi rme d by the testi mony of other witnesses, and as far as it was possible -to judge of the motives of another, his intention millet have been nothing but deliberate falsehood. The teetition prayed for his release on distinct and separate g'rounds, and al leged the dangerous state of his 7:ife. Retaining its own opinion, the Committee eke,' not interfere with the judgment, discretion, and compassion of the House. With respect to the jurt„iction of the House of Com mons with regard to controverted elections, he for one would be slo7; Ito part with that privilege. He was watchin; with great anxi e ty th e resu l t o f t h e experi -1 1 me"..;,. Ile was aware that some Hon. Members had very . recently expressed an opinion that it would be a failure. With great submission, in his humble opinion, he thought that was a premature judgment. It appeared to him that a Committee of the House of Commons was called upon, in trying election petitions, to look with peculiar jealousy on the nature of the evidence brought be fore them. Great part of that evidence was given by persons who were strong partisans. The witnesses were liable to great temptations, not knowing the Courts of Justice ; and in cases of prevarication he thought that the powers given by law to the Committee should always be en&rced. It was on these grounds that the Commit tee had acted as they had done. . Mr. RIGBY WASON said, that after what had been stated by the Hon. Member, he should best consult the feelings of the House by merely moving that the petition do lie upon the table. The Hon. Member also presented two petitions on the same subject; one of which was from the sisters of Lucas. The original motion was then withdrawn, and the petitions were ordered to lie on the table. On the motion of Lord STANLEY, the Order of the Day for the House going into Committee on the Aus tralian and New Zealand Bill was read, for the purpose of its being postponed until Thursday next. Dr. BOWRING presented a petition from the parish of St. Pancras against the Income-tax. In answer to a question from Captain MANGLES, Lord STANLEY said, that what he ha stated the other night with regard to the colony of New Zealand , was, that he could not speak with the same confidence in reference to that colony, as he could in reference to many others. He believed, however, that there was a consider able demand for labour. PARLIAMENTARY! REPRESENTATION. Mr. S. CRAWFORD then rose tO propose the follow ing resolution :—.‘• Whereas various petitions have been presented to this House, stating, to the effect, that, under the present system of election laws, the people are not duly represented ; and that they are thus deprived of the acknowledged right of freemen to have a voice in the making of the laws by which they are governed, and in imposing the taxes which they are required to pay. and therefore praying, that the right of 1 otino• may be extended to the adult male population of the realm, subject to no limitations or restrictions but such as may be necessary for the safe and correct practical exer cise of the right itself ; that votes should be taken by ballot ; that election districts should be equa lised to accord with the number of electors ; that no qualification should be demanded from Mem bers but that of being duly elected by a majority of votes ; that Representatives should be paid for their services at the public expense ; and that elections should be annual :—And whereas, complaint having been made, as above stated, that, under the present limi tation of the franchise and laws of election, there is not a full and free representation of the people; it is therefore the duty of this House to take into immediate consideration the amendment of these laws, with a view of giving to every portion of the community a full, fair, and free representa tion in the Commons' House of Parliament; and this House will, on an early day, resolve itself into a Committee of the whole House, for the purpose of considering the same." The Hon. Member, who was heard very • indistinctly in the gallery, commenced by referring to a number of petiticns, including a petition from Bradford and Gates head, which had recently been presented to the blouse, praying for an extension of the suffrage. There was also a petition signed by the chairman of a meeting of delegates which was held at Birmingham. It was signed by eighty-seven delegates from fifty-one towns, who were appoired jointly by the middle classes to represent their views with respect to the representation. How stood the representation of the country, could it be said it was fair ? Was it not the case that 133 Members of that House, belonging to th e C ount i es o f E ngland, Scotland, and Wales, were returned by means of the influence which the Aristocracy possessed' through the Chandos clause? They were the representatives not of the people, but of an Aristocratical oligarchy. Thus, in consequence of the division of the counties, and of the influence of the oligarchy, the abolition of the nomination boroughs had not produced the sffect which had been anticipated in giving effect to the popular voice, and every method of bribery had been had recourse to in order to defeat the effects of the Reform Bill, and the people justly complained that their voice was not heard in that House. If the voice of the people had been heard in that House, the expensive wars in China and Hindostan would not have been undertaken; and those measures which had driven the Canadians to revolt would not have been adopted. It was impossible to enforce economy with state of things. The shortening of Parliaments had not been effected, and the very reasonable proposition for extending to Ireland equal political rights with Englaed had been rejected. The Corn-law had been kept up, and a most oppressive Poor law enacted. To what was all this owing ? Un doubtedly to class legislation. He would do the Right Honourable Baronet at the head of the Govern ! ment the justice to say, that he (Mr. Sharman Crawford) believed that he would have advanced further to heeefit the people if he could, but he was re strained by the aristocracy. The first thing he pro posed as a remedy for those evils was an exten sion of the sufffrege to all males above twenty. one years of age, and unstained by crime. The prin ciple on which this proposition was founded 'had been most. eloquently and po'werfully enforced by the Noble -1 , (4*( 1 , the Member for L0i,•,1".), on introdhchig- the -Re form Dill. The Noble Lord on that occasion said that Considering that it is of little consequence that Vivier be a Courier de Commerce, that he was bearer only of one dispatch, and that the fact proved against him may be an isolated fact, er the result of practice or a custom to transport letters and journals coming from India, and destined for. England, and may have hitherto been practised by courriers de commerce in the presence of and knowledge of the administration of the Post Office, and under no opposion on their part, is totally indiffe rent, since it arises only from a blameable tolerance contrary to law. Considerin g th et i n t h e pretence o f a c l ear and precise legislation, w hi c h a d m i ts o f no except i on whatever, it cannot be admitted that either the administ ation of the Post-office, or the Minister of Finances himself, has any right whatever to grant authority or permission to what the law has not admitted or forbids. The Tribunal declares Vevier guilty of having interfered in the transmission of letters and parcels, and the President, after having read the articles one and five of the decree of the Con suls of 27 praireal year nine as therein specified, condemns Vevier to pay a fine of 150 francs and all expenses; and at the same time makes him liable for six months (per contrainte de corps) for the payment of the fine. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT (THIS EVENING.) HOUSE OF LORDS. The LORD CHANCELLOR took his seat on the Wool• sack at Five o'Clock. MUTINY BILL. The Mutiny Bill, and the Marine Mutiny Bill, were read a third time, and passed. MAItRIAGE LAWS. Lord BROUGHAM presented a petition from a place in the county Tyrone, against the Marriage-laws. COEN-LAWS. The Duke of BUCKINGHAM presented petitions from the farmers of East Sussex, from the Isle of Ely, Tetford, and Aylesbury, against the proposed Corn-laws. The Earl of YARBOIUJUGH presented a petition from Lincolnshire against the proposed alteration in the Corn-laws. no man of common Senn could pretend that the House of Commons represented the people of England, and he (Mr. S. C.) said the same of the present House of Commons. These were the general principles which the peti titioners desired—and he also desired—to maintain, But he did not deny that limitations requisitie limitations. to protect the exercise a the right itself. Unions should be excluded, to gether with lunatics, paupers, and felons. His object and the object of the petitioner, was to vest the franchise in the industrious classes of the country, and he would support all such regulations which were necessary to effect that object.. He thought lodgers should be admitted to the franshise asweli as householders. He thought also that there should be a particular law with respect to registration in Ireland. It was necessary that he should now refer to some of those objections which he was aware might be made to the proposition, he laid before the House, He maintained that most of these objections were applicable to the sufferings at present exist ing. The first of the objections to which he had alluded, was 'the want of education. He would ask were the majority of voters now existing educated ? Was not a great number of the county 101. voters inferior in education to the industrious classes, which was the amount of knowledge held to be necessary for a voter to acquire before he was qualified ? Was it necessary that he should be competent to understand all the quesions brought before Parliament ? If they demanded such a qualification a great proportion of those who now held the franchise would be excluded. It was not necessary that the voters should understand all the questions bi ought be fore the House of Commons. He considered it sufficie , that they could judge of th e c h aracter an d cop'' of the represeritatfies who required their votes. The next objection was the greater corruption that would prevail. Was there not much corruption at pre sent prevailing' from the highest to the lowest ? The third objection was, that if they admitted a larger class to the franchise, it would endanger the rights of property. He contended that the working classes, from their endeavour to obtain property, were interested in protecting it as much as those who possessed it. LEFT SPEAKING. THE Itol fi .IVIPTON M U RDER. RE-EXAMINATION OF GOOD AT I3OW-STREET THIS DAY. Mary Ann Clarke (in continuation from our Afternoon Edition) said—lt is the same silk, but it has been re-made. I last saw Mrs. Good on Sunday morning, the 3d • April, about ten o'clock. She was then to the back-yard. I have never seen her since. I have'seen her dressing, and I think I saw a mole just above the cielar-bone. I produce a piece of silk which is the same as that of which the bonnet is made. The handkerchief which was produced by Inspector Busain, anti was stained with blood, I have seen her wear upon her Leek, or one similar to it. The flannel also produced by Inspector Husain. 1 believe to be Mrs. Good's. I know it by its peculiar make—the wide band and the narrowness of the top. This key (one of the bunch produced by the Inspector) I knew, it is the key of the street door, and the worsted guard, with which the keys are tied, I also know; Mrs. Good used to wear it round her neck every days Elizabeth Christie exarnitte&-t tint the wife of Mr. Christie. We lived in the same htittse as Mrs. Good, and occupied the first fluor. I knew Mrs. Good. She had a little boy named Dan. Good living with her; I knew him ; he called Mrs. Good mother. The prisoner at the bar I also know; hp used to Visit Mrs. Good ; the little boy called him lxtli r. I last kw Mts. Good on Sunday, the. Id bf .April. I saw her at twelve o'clock. It ?met hbr own door. she came there to s p ea k t o me. She didspeak to me. I (lid not see her go out. 1 did twit see the boy that day. I saw the prisoner on the 6th of April, at half-past ten in the evening. He was unlocking Mrs. Good's room; a little boy was bolding a light to hitt. I spoke to him. I called ever the atlas " Who is there ?" He answered " MN" I eitid " Who is me ?" He said " Good; we're at bail this evening." I then saw that it was the pri totter. I asked him if that was his little boy with hitt', tte hit back was to me ; he answered "My little boy is in the coun try with h's mother." When 1 saw Mrs. Good last time I had some conversation with her; she did rut tell the where she was going. These articles (bonnet, gowns, handkerchief, and shawl) I know to be those belonging to Jane Good. I speak positively to them ; I altered the trimming on the bonnet about nine months before. This key I know; it is the key of the street-door ; the guard, too. I knows she always wore it round her neck. Sarah Young examined—l am a widow. I live at No. SO, East-street, 11Ianehrstet-square; that is only k teiv steps from South -street: I ant is heir neighbour of Mrs. Brown's. I knew Mrs: Geotl ; she lived.at brown's, the green-grocer's. She had a little boy with her. I often saw her. I saw her last, kteut half-past twelve, on Sunday, 3d April. I have never seen her since. She came to me then, and asked me to take the little boy, and give him a night's hedging. I refused, and she begged of me for God's sake to take him. She said, she dared pot take him wfth her. She was to re:urn on Monday morn ing. I did take him. He slept at my house till Monday morn ing, eight o'clock, and then he went to school. Mr. Lavender Leyton examined—l live at Putney. lam a confectioner. I know the prisoner at the her perfectly well. I met him on Sunday, April 3, on the road leading to the Sus pensionsbridge, Hammersmith, about half-way between the Suspension -bridge and the Red Lion. He was in company with a female. It was about a quarter before four in the after noon: He asked me how I was. He introduced me to the female that was with him, and said, " My sister, Mr. Leyton." She had on a dark dress and shawl, I did not notice her dress particularly. They were going towards Barnes, and I was going towards Hammersmith. John Brown examined—l keep the Coach and Horses at Barnes. I know the prisoner at the bar. I saw him on Sun day, April 3, about four o'clock, at any house. He had a female with him. I had some conversation with him—that is, he asked me how I was ? I said, " How do you do, coachman ?" And be introduced me to the woman, and said, " This is my sister; and be added that she was a Welchwoman. I said that many gentletren liked to get Welch girls for dairy maids. He said she had brought him some tea and sugar, arid some cream, and I said it was very kind of her. She took the cream out of her basket, in a pint bottle. They had two glasses of gin and water, which they drank. There was nothing at all particular about them, except that 'ne put the drink to her, and she ap peared to refuse to take it. They were in the house about twenty minutes. I cannot swear to any part of the, dress. Fanny Hesler examined—l am a Married woman, My hus band's name is William Hester. I live at Priest-bridge. That is about half a mile nearer to Putney than the Coach and Horses at Barnes. I know the prisoner at the bar. I saw him on Sunday, the 3d of April. He brought a female to drink tea with me. Be arrived at my home about half-past four. He said she was his sister-in-law. She wore a dark cotton gown and shawl with a black ground and coloured flowers. Her bonnet was purp'e coloured. They stayed tea with me. She took her bonnet off during tea, and she had on a white cap, trimmed with straw-coloured ribbon ; she had black boots on her feet, laced at the side. He said the reason he brought her there was, that the gardener was not agreeable. I mentioned Susan Butcher to Good, and said that I had heard seme very disrespectful things relative to her sleeping in the stable. ihe female appeared to be very much hurt, and said she was quite a stranger to her. Good said he was in haste, he must 'go home to wait at table, for his sister was going to return to London. when they were leaving I asked the female to bring the little boy to see me some day ; she said she would. The prisoner heard all this. They left my house together at half•past five. They took the road towards Putney. I think this is the bon net the female wore on that occasion, and the dress is like the one she then wore. I have never seen her since. On the Tuesday following, about half-past nine or ten o'clock in the morning, 1 saw the prisoner, who came to my house, and brought the little boy with him. He said it was his little boy, Daniel Good. He asked 11119 if I cnuld let him remain with me for a short time. I said he might, but that I was going to London. He then said he would take him back, as he would sleep with him that night. They then left. I went to London and returned about half-past eight in the evening. I then found the little boy at my house where he slept all night. The next day about twelve o'clock he left my house and said he was going to his father's, Police Constable Robert Payling, V 248—1 was on duty on Sunday :id April, on the Richmond-road. I know a place called Priest-bridge. It is about half-a-mile from Putney Park-lane. I know the prisoner. I saw, him on Sunday on the Richmond-road at half-past sizlin the evening, about a quarter of a mile from Priest-bridge ; there was a female in his company. They were going towards Putney Park-lane. The woman wore a blue bonnet and a dark-coloured gown. I could hear the woman discoursing very loudly, appare n tly i n an angry tone. By Mr. HALL—It did not occur to me at the time that they were having any words with each other. George Royal examined—l keep the King's Head, at Rae hampton. I know the prisoner at the bar. I saw him on Sunday, the 3d of April, about seven o'clock in the evening. He had a female with him. She was dressed in a light bonnet. I could not see the colour as it was dusk. He called for a glass of gin and water, of which they partook. I observed nothing particular about the drinking, more than that the female drank reluctantly. I mean by that, that h e preised her to drink oftener than she seeme d to wish to take it. They left the House together a little alter 8 o'clock. I do not know which road they went. Lydia Susannah Butcher. (When this witness was called the prisoner sat down in the box and leaned his head upon his hands on the front of the bars) lam the daughter of W. Butcher, is a shipwright at 13, Charlotte-row, Woolwich I am a single woman living with my father. I have known the prisoner for some time. I have been intimate with him. He has several times visited me at my father's house, Woolwich. I have been at Putney Park-lane three times, when he sent for me. I went once to him to the stables ; I remained there all night and returned home the next day. That was about a fortnight before Wednesday, the 6th of April. I saw him on Wednesday, the 6th, at my father's house ; he came there in a small pony-chaise.—(The prisoner here resumed his stand ing po s ture, but still kept his face covered with his hands.) He had a little boy with him who called him father. It was be tween three and four in the afternoon. He stayed till five. He I brought me five or six articles in the chaise and those boots, bonnet, handkerchief, gloves, &e., were the articles he brought me. (These were the things which had been identified as the property of Jane hues.) lie said he had brbught them as a present to me if I would accept them. He said they had been his wife's. ( The prisoner here raised his hand from his face, and looked affectionately at the witness, the effect of which was a shower of tears from her.) He had promised to bring me some things about a month or six weeks before; and all he said when he gave me the things was, that the bonnet would fit me, and that he had more things for me. He did not say when he should bring them. He also had some little squares of silk, shot colour, made like shawls, but these he did not leave. He had tea with us. When he went away, I went with him, and my sister, a little girl, also went half way to Greenwich. She then got out. I went on as far as New Cross. He told the little boy then that he was to call me mother, because his aunt was gone into the country. At New Cross we all got out, and went to a public- house, when we remained a short time. He and the. little boy then went home in the chaise, and I returned home also. The next day a poll, eman named Parry called on me, and I delivered to him the bonnet and other things. Prisoner said, in the courso of the chive ' something about a mang l e , an d I w a s t o go to see i t either on Saturday or Sunday. I was to meet him at Putney and we were to go together. Mr. Hate—Do you recollect any place in London where he said you were to see the mangle? Witness—He told me, Out 1 forget. If the place were mentioned to me 1 think I should recollect it. Mr. HALL—Was it North-street or South-street? Witness —I think it was South -street. Mr. HALL—Do you recollect the name of the square? Witness—lt was Manchester-square. Mr. Haee—Did he say to whom it belonged, or why you were to have it ? Witness-IN°. He said his sister was gone into the country, that was aii. Mr. II s t T, .00 the prisonerl—Do you trim to ask Ditcher any gnostic Prisontr—Yintr Worship, I have got a good deal to say yet, but nut ties time. Police-sergeant James Parry, BR, examined—l went to the house of the last witness on Thursday, 7th. I received from her all the things now lying before me (gown, bonnet, &c. before referred to). Prisoner—Your Worship, I have one word to speak to you : will you ask Susan But c h e r where the sh aw l i s ? were, Susan Butcher was th e n re-called, and of The Prisoner said—Susan, I've one question to put to you : you've brought all these things, why not as welt bring the shawl? I gave it to y ou , a s well as the other things, and you might as well have given it up. Witness—l have nothing of yours, Sir, I have given all up. Prisoner—You had a shawl, a large shawl ? Witness—No, I have not. Mr. HALL—Did the prisoner give you a shawl at the time when he gave you the other things? Witness—No, he did nut. Prisoner—She put it on her, s our Worship—l've got a great deal to say, but not now. She might as well have brought the shawl as the other things. Robert Goulding, police sergeant V. 31—I searched the kitchen in South-street, in company with Inspector Busain, on 9th April, and found there articles which I now produce. ( They are small pieces of printed cotton, of the same pattern and material as the di ess before alluded to; and some strips of blue silk, which were of the same colour as the bonnet. ) Mr. HALL—Do you wish to ask this witness any questions? Prisoner—No, your Worship; I know nothing at all about him. I've nothing to do with him. Daniel Good, jun., was then called, and the prisoner here sat down and wept bitterly he appeared to feel deeply. lam 10 years of age, and hare been to Sunday School and learnt to read my letters and say my catechism. By Mr. HALL—If 1 were to take an oath, and were to tell you a lie, I should go to hell. My father was coachman to Mr. Till within the last tertnight I used to live with my mother in South -street, Manchester-square. My father used to come and see us sometimes. That is my father (look ing to the prisoner). I last saw ray mother on Sunday before last. She was in South-street then. I Went to church on the morning of that day. I did nit see my mother after I came from Church. I did not expect to find her at home when 1 got from Church. After Church I went to 99, East-street, in consequence of some conversation I had had with my mix her- I slept there fhat night, and the next morning I went to school. I saw any father that day. My father went to South-street, and I was sent for from school. My father told me my motherwas gone to service, that I need not expect to see her for 6 months. He:staved at South-street about a quarter of an hour, and then he molt me to Blandford.street, and then to George -street. He took me to a carriage, and we rode a little was. He then asked a man to put me into an omnibus, which he did. The omnibas took me to Roehamp ton. My father did not tell me that the omnibus would take me to Boehm - Lipton. I wont to Mr. Rakes', a publican, and he took me to Mr. Shiell's, where I got about nine o'clock, and slept all night. On Tuesday I went to Priest bridge, to see Mrs. Hesther, with my f a th er . I stopped at Putney th a t d a y, an d slept at Mrs. Hester's. On Wednesday morning I went'to Putney Park-lane, and saw my father there; my father and I then went to Woolwich in a ponyschaise. Father took a small bandbox with him in the chaise ; there was a blue bonnet in it ; I knew the bonnet; it was my mother's ; I had seen my mother wear it ; I do not recollect how long she had had it, but it was a long time. My father also had with hint a small basket, with some tea-cakes in it. We then went to my cousin ; toy cousin is Susan Butcher; my father told me that she was my cousin. We stayed there about a quarter df an hour. My father took the things out of the chaise into the kitchen. 1 went into the kitchen to have tea, and I saw the things there, they were left there. When we left there, Susan Butcher and my cousin, who is a little girl about 13 years of age, went with us; the little girl did not go a great way with us, Susan went as far as the railway. My father told me that I was to call Susan Butcher my another. We stopped at the railway. My father and Susan Butcher got out and went into a public-house, where they re mained about ten minutes. I stopped with the pony. Susan Butcher then went home, and my father remained with me. We weut through 'Wandsworth on the road home, and made a stop at Mr. Colliogborne's, the tailor. My father bought a Pair of breethee there, and put them in the chaise. He then got into the chaise again, and we drove to Putney-park-lane. We got there about nir.e o'clock. I then went into the stable-yard. and was going up to the house, when a policeman came and said he wanted Mr. Good, the coachman. I then went iota the stable, and the policeman searched the stable. Father ran out and locked us in. I did not see my father any more that night. I have not seen him since till now. Prisoner—Your Worship, will you allow me to question him ? Mr. HALL—Yes. Prisoner , —Oh, any dear boy, don't cry ! The little fellow here began to cry most piteously, read the prisoner also seemed very much affected. Mr. HALL (to the prisoner)—You'll have an cpportunity by and by. Prisoner—Thank you Sir. Mr. Maule—This, Sir, closes the second part of the evi dence, up to twelve o'clock of the 6th. I shall now enter upon the third part, and trace him up to the time that he was taken into custody. The Court then adjourned for a few minutes to take re freshment ii and, on re-assembling, Mr. Mettle ibtithatetl that he thought they should not be able to proeeed with the eases of Anti Gond And gamble to-day, as it would be late before this would be concludea. Richard Salmon examined—l live as a potman at the tied ford Arms, South-street, Manchester-sqeare. I know the prisoner. He came to our house in a cab, No. 700, a few minutes before 12 on Wednesday night, April 6. My mistress was up. He asked her for a serew-driver ; he said he wanted it to get into his apartments, as he had left his keys behind him. My mistress lent him ore, and I went with him to 18, South. street; he knocked at the door, and Mr. Brown opened it 1 he let us in, and we went down to the kitchen deer, anal it Good's repot I drew the staple, and he got in there. left him, and went back wi.h. the strew-driver. George Jakes examined—l live at No. 9, Ranelagh-mews, Pimlico. I drive a hackney cab, No. 700. I knew the pri sonee. A little after eleven on Wednesday, the 6th of April, he tock my cab at Grosvenor-street, Pimlico, and I drove him to South street, Manchester square. I drift him to op posite No. 18, and we had seine dispute about the fare, he offered me ls, instead of Is. 4d.; he however came up, a penny at a time, and gave me half a pint of beer. He then borrowed a screw-driver of the landlady, and went into his house ; when he came out Fe paid me the other 2d., and wanted me to take him on further, but I would not. Mr. HALL—Have you any qu es ti o n t o as k thi s witness? HOUSE OF COMMONS. April 20. Prisoner—No sir—l've no questions ; the man was civil. THE EXCHEQUER BILLS BILL. John Brown examined—l live at No. 18 South street, Mane Sir GEORGE CLERK read the amendments of the chesterasquare. I' am the husband of Mr. Brown, who has Lords on this Bill, which were agreed to. ' been examined here to-day. lam a greengrocer, and let my On the Order of the Day being read for proceeding house out in lodgings. Mrs. Good lodged in the front kitchen with this Bill, of my house. I saw her last on Saturday, April 2. On Wed- Mr. C. BULLER complained that the Government nesday, April 6, the prisoner came to my house, about twelve o'clock at night. He knocked at th e s h o p d oor . I go t up , an d proceeded with their own measures on a Wednes said, " Who's there ? He replied, " It's me, Good," and he day, which it was generally understcod should be left to asked leave to pass through the shop into his apartments. I Hon. Members for their Bills and motions. Ile wished would not allow that, but I let him in at the private door. He to know whether the Australia and New Zealand Bill appeared flouried, and asked if I had a candle alight. would be proceeded with to-night ? I said, " No, nor I don't want one neither; you got latch keys Mr. WAKLEY said he thought that Government to let yourselves in, without disturbing me." 1 then went to measures should not be taken on a Wednesday night. bed, and he came in. About half-past five next morning, I The Noble Lord had moved the Orders of the Day, for heard a cab drive from the door. Prisoner—Mr. B rown , I' ve p a id y our ren t u p t o th e 4th the purpose, as he presumed, of bringing on the Licensed April, have I not? Witness—Yes. Lunatic Asylums Bill. He thought it was not fair to Prisoner—Well, I ehall obtain leave from his Worship, per- enter into emelt a ., que s tion o before a House like that. Ile the haps, to have the things so ld f o r my child. You s h a ll h ave hoped, in case LIN went into Committee, that the your rent. bringing up of the nolort would be postponed till Tues- Witness—l shall give them up to the police. day fortnight. Prisoner—Yes; you shall be paid. I know you are a very Lord G. SOMERSET intitnated that he had no oh good man. j ect i on to postpone t h e b r i ng;ilF up of the Report till the Stephen Purdeyan, 16 D--On the mornin g o f th e 7 t h April, tune specified by the Hon. (lentl,:man, but he thought it about a quarter past five, I saw a cab standing at Mr. Brown's advisable to go into Committee on the Pill• door, 18, South-street, Manchester- square . I saw i t t h ere about fi ve m i nu t es , b u t did n o t see any one g o a wa y i n it. I Mr. PAKINGTON said that he thotteer.,:! the House got in conversation with the cabman, an d w hil st I was ta lki ng i ought to go into Committee on the Bill, but the: t some . to him I s aw th e prisoner come cu t o f t h e d oor and call the observations might be necessary before they did so. BARRISTERS (IRELAND) BILL. eabman. I then crossed to the opposite side, and 1 observed a large trunk passed out to the cabman Sir V. BLAKE moved the second reading of this by the prisoner. I took the number, and then went Bill. He stated that the only object which lie wished to away. I went to No. 4, the next day, Flower and accomplish was, that Irish law students should not be Dean-street, Spitalfields. That house is let out in lodgings. I compelled, as at present, to reside at one of the Inns of went there in search of Good. I saw a person who w the name of M rs . Good there, and I f oun d some t hi ngs t h ere went, by Court in London, as a preliminary qualification to •be called to the Irish leer. He stated that the Bill, as now which I produce (a quantity of towels, a gown, two small work-boxes, Sec.) printed, was introduced by him at the special instance and request of persons who represented that they were a Mr. HALL—Do you wish to ask this person an y ques ti on ? Prisoner—l never gave her the things, Sir. She pinned deputation from the Irish law students ;it was their • a 'em. I didn't know that she h a d so many t hi ngs. S he Bill,andke) told th e he (Sir Valentine Bl de pinned 'em for herself, unbeknownst to m e . • putetion tnat the • Bill contained objectionable Daniel Good, jun., was recalled, and recognished the two matter in his opinion, but that,froinhisrersipetced, andtfo for the boxes produced by the la s t w it ness , as hi s mot h er ' s. H e sa i d stu d ents, h e wou ld b r ing it in and have it printed, I've seen them every day. I saw them on Saturday, April 2. permitted by the House to go into Committee upon it, William 111.Evoy sworn—l res id e at No. 2, Laundry-yard, the objectionable parts might be omitted, and that part Westminster, l am a pav e ) , 1 was at wor k in the poultry only retained which would repeal tho existing law as to on Thursday morning, April 7. There wore two others with the residence of Irish students in London: He was, me at work. Igo to work a t s i x o'clock. I saw the p r i soner however eorr • to perceive that all the established legal thete about three min u t es past s i x i n t h e morning. He , was on foot and had no thi ng w i t h h i m. He asked autnoeitie; in ' the liottse were opposed to the r e p ea l us to do somethi ng in some .language whi c h we 3 of the old Act of 3 Henry VIII., which, wh en did not understand. He then asked my comrade, in enacted, was useful, just, statesmanlike, and necessary.. English, to write a dire c ti on . H e sa id h e cou l d not do that B ut w h en i t was recollected that there was then n o Um neither. He then asked me if I would do it. I said I had no versity in Dublin—that tilt superior Courts of Law and objection. We then went to the Three Tuns in Coleman- Equity in Ireland existed meet,' in name ; that there stieet. We bad a quartern of gin. and he called for a sheet of was no law library—no King's fulls ; that, in fact, the paper and pen and ink. I then wrote according to what he administration of justice was conducted under the told me. I asked him what name I should put to the bottom s—no Sheriffs— of. ancient law ' that there were no Assiz.2 it , 2e no doubt -t it, and he said "Daniel Good." He said it w as t o go t o Mr. no counties then in existence ; there ccouldShiell's (which letter was p i odued). Wh en I h ad wr i tten but that under such circumstances was prunes.. and it. I inclosed a duplicate in it, and folded it up. wise to introduce the system, whereby students for tn..' The letter, as far as it could be read, was to this effect : . . . • Irish bar were instructed in the practical knowledge of "My dear Sir,—.l hope you will take care of my little boy. Irish bar . . the administration of the laws of England. This House I took tea on Sunday evening at Cox's Fields, Deptford. I kept company wi•h Susan B u t c h er s i nce Ch r i stmas last; s h e would not den the existence of th e c h anges w hi c h is the cause of all m y m i s f or t unes . I am not a s i ngle man, are t h e result of y tizne. We have it on the authority of Mr. but I buried my wife seven years ago. You will find a mat- Hume, that when he wrote (now approaching to a century tress and two blankets in the straw in the stable, which Susan ago) thepopulation of Ireland alone was greater than the Butcher and me slept in since Christmas last." population of the three kingdoms at the time of the death 11 he Prisoner appeared exceedingly anxious that this letter of Elizabeth. Was it too much to affirm that it was now ! should be read ; but no one could make out more of it, than three times as great as the population of the whole United the portion we }save given, which was read by the last witness who wrote it. Kingdom when the 33d lien. VIII. was enacted ? This ' Anthony Tye examined--I am a hair-dresser, at Bromley law was impolitic, and unsuited to the present time. in Kent, on Sunday . , 10th April, a little after eleven o'clock, Was it just or fair that men who had struggled the prisoner came to my house to be shaved. He had a bed to obtain degrees in Trinity College, and who and a large bundle with him. I partly shaved him, but had not the pecuniary means of entering their ore of us became agitated, and I did not finish him. The first names on one or other of the Inns of Court in London, thing that attracted my attention was, that when he came in, and of a residence there for near two years—was it con instead of sitting down where my chair is always placed in the sistent with a true patriotic feeling to exclude nine out light near the door, he turned the chair round, and sat with his of every ten men thus situated, many of them distin buck to the light. There was a proclamation for Good's ape guished, and some having obtained academical leinours? prehension exhibited at the police. station opposite my house. be thus excluded from all participation in the lottery Being impressed with the idea that the prisoner was like Good, I ofo made some observations to a young man named Addis, who was professional advancement was indeed an injustice and a in the shop, about the murder at Roehanipten. I did not o b- cruelty which he (Sir V. B.) hoped to be instrumental in serve that the conversation affected the prisoner. He gave abolishing ; if not now permitted, he would persevere me a penny for shaving him; he said that he had been travel- in some other form, and thus achieve what he considered hog about for a good many days, and he hoped that would be to be for his country one of its most undoubted and va suffici, nt. He said that he was going into the country to luck luable privileges. Raving brought this measure for for a job. I said it era, very strange that a bricklayer's ward under the circumstances before stated, and at the labourer should go to look for a job on a Sunday special request, as he (Sir V. Blake) thought, of the "and to tall you the truth," I said, "I don't think you've been Irish students it was not without the utmost amazement a bricklayer's labonrer at all for the last three months." said, "Well, to tell you the truth, I've n o t b een a b r i c klayneer he saw himself placarded as an unworthy Irish Membersaid, by a meeting of the students in Dublin, held on the 16th long, but I've been in a capacity which m a d e it necessary f or me to shave every day, an d I don't feel comfo r t a bl e w i t h out i t. " inst. It was plain that a great misunderstanding o f Prisoner—What was my dress? Witness—A Fair of low the circumstances under which he was prevailed upon shoes and white cotton stockine,s ; a pair of fustian overalls, a to introduce the present Bill did exist at that meeti ng, black waistcoat. and that no one at it was aware that persons here, acting Prisoner--Yes, that's quite right. in the name and on behalf of the Irish students, were, in William Addis examined — l am a market-gardener, living point of the fact, the authors of the Bill, and so far mis t Plaistow, in the parish of Bromley. I was in the shop of led him (Sir V.) as to induce him to undertake the the last witness on Sunday, the 10th o f Ap r il. I h a d a conver- duty at the special instance and request of the sation about. the murder. As soon as it began the prisoner whole body of the Irish students. It was satisfac turned his chair from the light, and trembled very much. tory however, that even in the disciaimer put Mr. Maule (to the 1 1 1agistratel-1 wig now bring you to the l , oqii at that meeting, the re w as contained a full and end of this long inquiry, Si r . ample recog nition of the pri nc i p l e f or which alone he Thomas Rose examin e d —I li ve at T on b eidge, and am a e " ml , , bricklayer's labourer. I was wor ki ng f or Mr. i-arrett at the lion of wo uld Perseveringly contend namely the aholi he prohibition to admit p ersons d u l y e d ucate d to railway station on the 11 t h A pr il l ast. I saw the prisoner u o there on the 15th; he had been to dinner, and I thought I thehish bar, unless they were in pecuniary circumstances knew him ; and on the 16th I saw him again, and was certain which would enable them to pay 301. or 4C/. for an ad that I had seen him before at Putney Park-lane about 16, mission, and to reside in London. months ago. Ile was coachman then to Mr. Sbiell; I was Mr. Sergeant JACKSON opposed the second reading then so uneasy that I could not go to work ; I knew there was a o f the Bill, and moved that it should be read a second proclamation out for him, and I cemmunleated all I knew to trine that day six months. Ile believed that the Bill was Police Constable Lidlow. I afterwards saw him in custody at slot called for, and that the students of the Irish Bar the An at Tonbridge. The prisoner at the bar is the man. were satisfied that they received great benefit from being Stephen Lidlow policeman No 4 nn S.•:11 , 1! For. „ of • i,„ 1 1 • Rail , (,•miget..o keep mniwerterms in • ay, eltaluined—ln f;ons, • • • •.• last witness, 1, comp t i n y with' m i. H ue Mr. Ol G'CONeNELL said that the Irish student who was hire d, by the present law, to come to London suit of the prisoner on Saturday, the 10th. I round Lim at work on the border of the Railroad. He was sElticited by Mr. Httra phry, and nothing but some halfpence found upon lab': leiter: wards searched him and found a watch upon him, and a purse containing three sovereigns, and a half-sovereign and three half-crowns concealed in. his stocking,. On the left. shoulder under his shirt there was a jackonvt apron. I cannot say whether there were any marks upon it. He wore trousers and a jacket which appeared to be made of fustian, and a black waistcoat.—(They were produced.) On the collar of the jacket there is an appearance of blood. There are also marks of blood upon the trousers. This is a spoon which the pri soner produced himself. Prisoner—l bought those clothes on Thursday morning be tween the borough and Tooley-street, at a Jew's shop. I never wore them at my master's. George Hoare, examined—l am the chief-warden of the House of Correction, Clerkenwcll. These clothes I trink from the prisoner when he wa3 given into my charge. Tlit.re are marks of blood upon all of them. MauLE—l propose to close my case here, and to submit to you that there is sufficient evidence to send Lim to trial. Mr. HALL (to the prisoner)—There is no obligation on you to tell me anything, unle,s you wish it. If you wish to hold your tongue till the time of your trial arrives, you can do so., Whatever you say now, will be taken down and used against you. After what I have said, it rests with yourself to say whe ther you will make any statement or not. Prisoner—The clothes I wore at my master's have been taken from me. Those clothes I bought at Tooley-atrect. Mr. HALL—Then if I understand you, the clothes now pro duced, you never wore in your master's service? Prisoner—Exactly. My fidger bled, and that it was that marked those clothes with blood. , 111 r. 'Maule—Perhaps 1 bad better go on and call another witness. ilaria Ardy examined—l am the wife of John Ardy, a basket-maker, of Tunbridge. On 'Monday, the 11th of April, the prisoner came to my house at seven o'clock and took lodgings. He asked if I had any lodgings. I said I had half a bed. I asked him his name. He said it was " James," and added that he was a bricklayer's labourer at present, but he had been a hawker of hare-skins and rabbit. skins. I told him my rules were that I would not take any lodger unless he produced some property; lie said he could do so. and he then went away and retired with the bundles ; on,t he said he should want when he went to bed, and the (iler I was to take great care of, and not give up toany one. He slept at my house then till the day he was apprehended. I then gave the bundles up to 111 r. Humphrey the inspector. Prisoner was very fiagetty and restless all the time that he lived with me. When any one came to the door he wanted to know v.ho it was, and what was_their bosines, and I was very much offended at it. Prislmer—Have you brought my wages, Bs. bd. Witness— No, I have not, but I can. Prisoner—But why not you give it in? I worked for that money, and I ought to have it. Mr. Humphrey, a special constable on the South Eastern Railway was next examined. The bundle before me is one I had from Mrs. Audry, it contains a black coat, a child's handkerchief, a dark pocket-handkerchiela plosh uvaistcoe, a pair of drab small-clothes, a small glass, a pair cf drab gaiters. The witness then paid 9s. 6d. over to the inspector, which was given to the prisoner at his request. Mr. Mauls—Well, that's my case, sir. Mr. Hann—Those clothes will be prodnced on your trial if that is what you wish. Prisoner—l wish, Sir, you would make the man who took the money from me give it to the Governor at Coldbath-firlds for my chilld, because before I am tried I wish to give them over. Mr. HALL—I can give no order of that sort. "Prisoner—Might I request, Sir, that Sou would let me go back now to the same prison that I have just come from (Cold bath-fields. ) Mr. HALL—I cannot do that, if Sou are committed, you must go to Newgatc. Mr. MA ULE then said that as it was a quarter past six, and the depositions would have to be read if they went on, he should submit that the I , risoner be remanded till to-morrow - evening.. Mr. HALL said he should rather finish to-night. D . r. BURNELY, the Clerk, then commenced reading the de positions, and had not finished when we went to press. TATTERSALL'S-THIS EVENING. Six O'CLOCK. THE DERBY. 8 to 1 agst Attila 11 to 2 agst Frederica 14 to 1 agst Joanna—taken 30 to 1 agst Elvas • 40 to 1 agst Lord of Holderneni 40 to 1 agst Moss 'Trooper 33 to 1 agst Meteor 50 to 1 agst Timoleon 20 to 1 agst De Gorham 30 to 1 agst Ballinkeele. A deputation consisting of Mr. Bell, M.P., Mr. Liddell, M.P., Mr. Hodson Hinde, M.P., accompanied by Mr. R. W. Brindley (Chairman of the Coal Committee), Mr. N. Wood, M. J. Johnson, and Mr. AllhuFen, had an in erview this morning with the Chancellor of the Exchequer in Down ing -street, on the subject of the proposed alterations in the coal duties. SOUTHAMPTON ELECTION, April 20.—The Tories of Southampton have been on the look-out for a candidate to stand with Mr. Mildmay, in the full expectation that Mr. Martin will be unseated, and be disqualified through bribery from standing again. Unable to take in a stranger, the Tories hale resolved upon dragging poor old Mr. Dottin forward as the only man whoie wealth and easy dispcsiticn are suitable for be ing victimised. Nothing Lut absolute necessity wield prompt the 'links to the cruelty cf hurrying to the grave through the toil of election contests a gentleman whose age and infirmities have brought him to the last stage of decrepitude. Mr. Dottin is in London, and would gladly be excused from the embrace of his old victimisers, who will only hug him to pick his pocket. The General Steam Navigation Company's vessel the Giraffe, from Rotterdam, arrived off the Castom-house at nine o'cicck A. m. , this day, with the Dutch mail. • IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. IRISH SPIRIT'S BILL. The Duke of WELLINGTON gave notice that he would postpone his intended motion fur the third reading of this Bill from to-clay until to-morrow evening. QUARTER SESSIONS BILL. The Marquis of NORMANBY presented a petition from the Mayor and Corporation of Kingston-upon-Hull, praying the House not to pass the Bill now before the House, for amending the criminal jurisdiction of the Quarter Sessions Court. INC OM E-TAX. The Earl of ZETLAND presented a petition from Northallerton against the Income-tax. Lord WESTERN presented a petition, agreed to at a public meeting in Essex, convened by the High Sheriff against the Government Corn-law measure. The meet ing had entirely originated with the farmers ;' and they prayed the House not to pass, without amendment, a Bill which would prove so prejudicial to their interests. Lord FAVERSHAM presented a petition trom the Farmers of Boroughbridge against the Corn-law Bill. CORN BILL. The Earl of RIPON moved the Order of the Day that the House resolve itself into a Committee on the Corn Bill. The Earl of STANHOPE said before their Lordships went into Committee on the Bill, he wished to address a few words to their Lordships. He must contend that the House ought not to be deterred from making alte• rations in this Bill, although it might be considered in the light of a money Bill. No such consideration ought to prevent their Lordships from doing their duty. He would ask whether it would not be fair and reason able to afford to the House of Commons, par ticularly those Members who were opposed to the Bill, another opportunity of discussing it. With respect to the Bill relative to the tariff, he begged to give notice that it was his intention when the Bill came into their Lordships House, to move its rejection. The House then went lilt° Committee on the Corn Bill, the Earl of SHAFTESBURY in the Chair. The preamble of the Bill was postponed, and the clauses up to No. 12 were agreed to. On Clause 12 being proposed, Earl STANHOPE observed that, it would empower the Lord Mayor and Aldermen of the City of London to nominate a corn inspector for that city. Now he would move that this clause be struck out. Ho objected to Lon. don being admitted as an average town at all. It would exercise an injurious influence on the price of coin gene rally. In 1840 its price was on the average ss. 9did., rather higher than that of the provinces. The Earl of RIPON said that there were other towns besides London in which the averages varied from the general average of the country; and if the principl e o f the Noble E a r were adopted, those towns should also be omitted. The only object in including large towns such as London was, to enable them to get as fair a general average as possible ; and if those large towns were omitted, the equilibrium of the system would be destroyed. • Earl STANHOPE said that he objected to London, because in the London averages the charges of carriage . and commission were necessarily included ; and that - wi s not the case in other market towns. .The clause was then agreed to. Clauses 13, 14, and 15, were agreed to without any amendment. On clause 17 being put, Lord BEAUMONT said it was his intention to move amendment to the ;clause, his object being to get the prices from the grower and not from the factor. lie did that on the principle that frauds were at present com mitted, and there was nothing on the dart of the Govern ment system that showed their principle would re move those frauds. He should:therefore move the omission of this clause, and when they came to the 25th clause, he beg ged to give notice that he would move an amendment to that The reason why he proposed that amendment was, that it would destroy the frauds that all parties were agreed had been committed under the present system. It would take away all inducement from the seller of corn to make a false return. He would have no reason to give out that the average was contrary to what it was in fact. After a few observations the Committee di vided : For the clause . Against it. 80 Majority (LEFT SITTING.) -68 HOUSE OF COMMONS. The SPEAKER took the Chair at the usual hour. NEW MEMBER. Lord NEWPORT took the oaths lurid his seat as Mem. ber for South Salop, in the room of the Earl of Darling• ton, now Duke of Cleveland. WAKEFIELD ELECTION COMMITTEE. Mr. HOME DRUMMOND reported that the Com mittee appointed to try the Wakefield Election Petition had resolved that Joseph Holdsworth, Esq., had not been duly returned to serve in the present Parliament for the borough of Wakefield, and that the Hon. W. S. Lascelles had been duly elected, and ought to have been returned for the said borough. The Clerk of the Crown was ordered to attend to morrow to amend the return. On the motion of Mr. MUNTZ the Birmingham and Derby Junction Railway Bill was read a third time and passed. Colonel VERNER presented a petition against the present system of national education in Ireland. Lord CHARLES MANNERS presented a petition from a place in Leicestershire against the new tariff, par • ticularly that part which proposed to reduce the duty on live and dead stock. The petitioners also prayed the House to adopt such alterations in the new tariff as would give due protection to the agriculturist. Sir E. FILMER presented a petition from the Guar dians of Wandsworth, with respect to the rating of te nements. Also a petition from Maidstone, against the new tariff ; and also a petition from Birmingham, against the Act with respect to boroughs. Mr. WARD presented petitions from Bishops Stort ford and Royton, against the Inco me -t ax ; a l so a peti tion from the ordwainers of Sheffield, against the proposed tax on leather, considering the present depreised state of the trade exercised by the peti tioners. The Honourable Member also presented a petition from an individual of the name of George Smith, who in 1839 was an elector at Cambridge, who had been imprisoned on account of bribery. It appeared from the statements of the Honourable Member, that in 1839 Mr. Manners Sutton and Mr. Milner Gibson were two of the candidates for the representation of Cambridge. Upon that return a petition was presented to the House of Commons, praying that the election might be declared void, on account of bribery. An Election Committee was appointed to try the merits of the election, at which it was proved, that although the petitioner himself did not receive the money, his wife had received nine sovereigns from a person of the name of Long for the petitioner's vote. Those nine sovereigns were at the present moment in the possession of a person name Bayne, and the object. of the present petition was, that the Hou se wou ld or d er that money to be paid by Mr. Bayne, either to the fund for the relief of the distress at Paisley, or to some other charitable purpose.—(Laughter.) The Hon. Member was at a loss what course to pursue with respect to the petition ; but as he intended, on some future occasion, to take the sense of the House upon it, he would move that it should be printed, giving, at the same time, notice of his intention to bring it under the consideration of the House on some future occasion. Lord R. GROSVENOR presented a petition from Chester, praying that the same rule which was adopted with respect to public-houses in London, on Saturdays and Sundays, might be adopted in Chester. BEWDLEY ELECTION. _ ------- The SPEAKER informed the House that the parties who had petitioned against the return for the borough of Bewdley, did not intend to proceed with'their petition. RUTLAND ELECTION. The SPEAKER also informed the House that the parties who had petitioned against the return for Rut land, had informed him that it was not their intention to proceed with their petition. THE TARIFF. Mr. CUMMING BRUCE presented petitions from plaes in Elgin, aga i nst that part cc t1_;; Itc.tv tariff th importation of•tive stock.. • . • lir. G. 13ANKS presented a petition from Dorset, THE SUN, LONDON, THURSDAY EVENING, APRIL 21, 1842. to study, was exposed to the temptations of the metropo lis, at a time of life, when, of all others, it was most dint geloOs to them. The generality of the students merely came to England to save the terms, and not for the pur poses of study. Ile hoped the House and the. Learrxti Solicitor-General for Ireland would not oppose the intro duction of a measure which would dispense with the compulsory attendance 3f Irish students at the Inns of Court in London. Mr. HURD opposed the second reading of the 1301. The amendment, was then put and carried, without s division. DRAINAGE (IRELAND) COMMITTEE. Mr. SMITH O'BRIEN moved that Mr. J. O'Brien be added to the Committee on the Drainage (Ireland) Bill.—Agreed-to. The House then adjourned at a Quarter after T'welve o'Cloek. THE NEW CORN BILL AND TARI FF. ESSEX COUNTY MEETING. On Tuesday, pursuant to a requisition to the Hies Sheriff of Essen, signed by Lords leayleigh and Wester and a number of oth w freeholders and farmers of thc, county, a meeting took place at the Shire Hull, Chelnise ford, for the purpose of considering that steps should be taken by - the county in refereece to the alterations in the Corn-laws and the Tariff of Lpties proposed by bee Majesty's Ministers. The meeting was aifirst fixed to take place in one of the Assize Courts, but it was soon 'found that this did not afford sufficient space, and the meeting •ae" cordingly adjourned to the open air. Before the ad; journlncnt took place, a letter was read from Lot'‘'' IVestern, apologising for his absence, on the ground that the fatigues of attending the debates in the House of Lardy rendered it impossible fin-him to be at Chelmsfold- Lord Raylegh also excused himself on the same group and conducted his •letter in the following terms :—" signed the requisition because I felt that the proposed iteration of the law was calculated to effect a g reat change in the condition of the farmers, and that they ought to have an opportunity of being heard." J. F. Fortescue, Esq., the. High Sheriff; accompeniee l by Mr. Bramston, Sir J. Tyrrel, Messrs. C, G. a nd• 14niiill, Mr. Palmer, and Major Beresford, the Membitag having opened the meeting, Mr JOHN BAWTREY regretted that the Noble Lords* and other distinguished persons who had signed the Tee quisition, to convene this meeting were nut presegg; but he would not shrink from expressing his opinime• Their property, even there very existence was e nder" gered. The Members for the county of Essex had 11 (4 done their duty to . their constituents who sent them WI Parliament, and he would ask the meeting whether as the representatives of an agricultural county, it was an ti their duty at all risks to stand forward in support e 4 i egricte titre. Was not their watchword at the last dee' Lion " Protection to agriculture ?" Were not their banners emblazoned with the "Farmer's friends," an d had their conduct in Parliament, he would ask, been accordance with their open avowals and implied pleeiges' —(Cheers, and cries of " No, no.") He would ask a n Honourable Gentleman in particular, whether ha% jag declared his opinion that the income proposed by ble` ,. Majesty's Ministers would be ruinous to agriculture ; h' d thought he was doing his duty to his constituents 101 01 ' he did not offer any opposition to that measure in his ple a in Parliament. Sir Rebert bad thrown them over.—(Criel of "No.") He believed that he had deceived and betraye d the farmers.—(Cheers.) Mr. Bawtrey concluded by pro posing a petition to the House of Lords, praying that' the proposed Corn-law and Tariff might be rejected, ' materially modified • and at the same time expressing a l l' . opinion that if passed in their present shape, they level" be ruinous to the interests of the agriculturists of th e country. Mr. Honns seconded the motion. Mr. TUFNELL moved an amendment to the effect, Oa - the meeting, viewing with regret the condition in whie! i l the country had been left by the late Government, a° hoping that the proposed alteration of the Corn-1eA1 .5 , would have the effect of alleviating some of the distress"' which was by some attributed to those laws, O n : -e sented to the proposed alteration in the Corn-laws, bt" at the same time, directed the attention of the Legt:-n; Lure, to the proposed new tariff, and prayed that sue' steps would be taken with regard to it as would blue proper protection and encouragement to agriculture. After the Members had endeavoured to vindicate': themselves, and sonic other gentlemen had addressed' the meeting, the High Sheriff put the motion and th e. amendment. The motion for a petition was carried bY a large majority. The necessary arrangements for its,. presentation to the House of Lords, a nd a ..vote 0 ' thanks having been passed to the High Sheriff, t he meeting separated LLOYD'S SHIPPING. VESSELS SPOKEN WlTlL—Meanwell, Newcastle tc` Odessa, and Racehorse, Liverpool to Caustantin°P l ,`;' 17th alt., lat. 36, lon. 3 Ir. by Condor of Bremen; 12 : 1 , , inst., lat. 50, lou. 8, by the Salacia, arrived at Falmou,' Countess Dunmore, Batavia to Amsterdam, Feb. 19w ' Adair'', Cape, to London ; 27th, lat. 1 N., Seyinoll . : Calcut:it to London, 2nd ult., lat. 2, lon. 22, by th " Thomas I.;!vtli, arrived at ditto. Mary, Mauritius to Cork, 19thlob., lat. 5 S., lon. 16 W., Euphrates,--Ceylo9l to London, 26th, Mt. 1 S., lon. 21 W. ; Forfarshirer China to London, 28th ; John Toinpkinson, ditto to. ditto, Ist March, r.; t. 1 N., lon. 23 by the Helen, arrived at Liverpool. ,Mary Kensington, Liverpool t° New York, 28th ult., lat. 40, lon. 43, by the Palestine, arrived at Kinsale. EAST INDIA SHIPPING. Arrivals—Thomas Blytb, Bay, from Mauritius, °ll Falmouth, sailed Jan. 'l6. • Arrivals at Mauritius—Susannah Collings, Whi t : Jan. 6, from Algoa Bay ; Mazagran, Bolbere, fN Havre; Meteor, al`Kinlay, from the Clyde; Oscar, Bordeaux ; Packet Stirling, 7th, from the Cape ; Ce' r brian, Garrick, from Calcutta ; Jane' Cumming, Lind e ' l , Bth, from Sydney ; Sunspareil, from Madaernsc'f o .: Charles, Heddle, 9th, from Madagascar ; • Queen' Vi c ! di ria, 9th, from Marseilles ; Tiger, 9th, Manchester a ir Peru, 10th, from Madagascar ; Charles, from OiL vi ii 6 ;; Venus, from Angonley ; Dream, 11th, from Bourb ° ll ,. Aigle, from Port de Cette ; Trois Fereres and Bonito aids, 12th, from Bourbon; Isabella Blyth, •14th, J r London ; Colombo. M'Kellar, 13th, f:om Aden. , 5 Departures from Mauritius—Comet, Denviere, for Madagascar ' • Gem, Robbe, for Leith ; for Liverpool ; Saucy Jack, Bth, for Ms.tdagascar ; Savereign, 11th, for Rangoon ; Eumpe, Thon 3 P inly . cleared 10th, for Pondicherry. Loading for Loto, Feliza, Mar gar et Connall, M a ry A nn , Mary for Druid, Auriga, Adino. For .Newcastle—.Elizo- Leith—Tigress. Fur Glasgow—. Mary Campbell Greenock—Merlin. 21 Arrival at Pert Philip—Timbo, Bentley, O ct ' from Launceston. • THE MARKETS COAL MARKET. Ships arrived since last marnet.day, 15. s. $ d. 1" '0 Aoair'r Bell, Bobson k Co. Hartley 17 ti Walls End Killitorsvorth ••• : !I 0 Buddle's West Bartley lB 1 W E. Braddyll'HUttoti ..: 0/ , Chester Main Holywell Main l(i 0 Walls End litewat t's .... ... '2 , 9 New Tan 6 cid M00r...... l4 0 Walls End Hartlepool , ....... it $ Old Tanfield l3 II Walls End Deng') Hall.se'.., 'Y 1 1 „ 6 Ord's liedhetigh l4 * Walls Ei.d Boweurn ......... 0 ._ Tanfield Moor ..... West Hartley West Wylam Wylam .. ........... Li :1 WillsW E l : l, ld d C G 0 0 u rd n 0 d n 0n ... .......... ,.. ... i 16 , C Walls End Clcnncll l7 t Wal.a E. d Tees . .. ....... ..." 0 Walls End .loslorth IRISII MARKETS. DUBLIN MARKET NOTE for the Week P Ol l ll5 ending A Av erail tr 9 9 0 i 4 4 1 3 u From To 1,112 Wheat,per barrel 2t. stone..." 1:0 0 40 0 ;3•7 Bore ....... ........ .. 16 stole l4 0 14 ', liB7 Barley l6 stone."... 14 e 22 0 423 hats ...... 5 0 Flour, per cwt 8 stone.... 0 0 13 435 Oatine4l 8 stone. l2 0 14 6 1 1 Sold to Bakers only. 20 20,855 Cwt. F o lour .. 8 U 24 a d, ( .1 Average price a Wheat and Flour 53. 4d ~ pe r sac 14s ,tx , Receipts of Flour, 9.21' Fi n t m••••.•••••• •11.° 1" '''' ( ,-,, a to I od Sales of Do. 23,4L ' il 1 Sec° " 2 • frau ' )ss. u'. '''' 14' Thirds .......... from 6s. - PX ICE or Ultra n. Aj hd. Quartcrr. boat ...... ...;'d. j halt Quartern ....."" 041 11' . • CORK MARKETS,—ApriI 16. 0 1„, A' c. g Wheat (per 20.:•122s 0.1. to4:11. Od.itjats (per 14st. ... 6 ,t• i i Barley (per 1654)11 0 13 0 IFlor r (per cwt ~.... ' Oatmeal (perewt.)... ...2.. 00 to 135.. to 51 kW, 6d. to W.... Mutton, 51. tritiit.....Veal, 4 i" i . I D. kork, 40. to 50.—Fresh Butter , 11d. to 12d P e r o i PRICY OF BUTTEII. 1 .,, the C,..5i To the Merchants. '''" . ...• ~"- f l irett;2:- 01111 •"' 7 3,, .... ~ ...... -'' .- e••••••.." ....... t Second ..... .. 71 • ..,...,............ .. . 5 59 ' ." . .. 4 11111,1 • . ~. ~ Fourth ....a.m. •46 ••••••''-'• .• ....... 10 Filth .... .. Sixth ~„„.......................:._ .......: n il E. ... 1.7.4...H: ~..., . .A , ....„; „ ...r ..i.i . ,. .. ..... CLONMELL Mt. d. L 4 1" Po 4.,."'t• 4., „c - • 0 R. d. s. d. .---- 0 .... 46 0 Now Butter .98 oto 1.9 0 riideft:awl....'" . .4. l i 0atmea1...... 0 14 6 8ae,..7 , Eg.'...."'7„,.i , 0 0 Rendereo lard 0 32 t, riezds..,.... "• '- j U ... Per ag. _,,,,...*; t i Fleur,Second ... 0 40 :,.. I flour, Matte ••—_, P 15 , ( , 1 —Household V 38 0 I ---leourinb. — . Per Barrel. .16 o o 0 I Barlay .......... ..... , .. 13 0 C. ............"".. 20. 0 aspesecd BM ........... toot* ••• •• eta. " o Os. 0 0 • •4 0 7 O 0 1 o 1 0 0 4.1 O 6 L , 0 t, KILKENNY MARKETS. Wl.est,p4rbarrel)iS.od.to od. Beef :7 , er il'• •••••' Barl2y 12 0 19 U klutt.6 , ••••••••••• fiats. 14 () t 5 0 Pori. ...•..••...•••• I.lour (per bag) 25 0 :39 0 Butter(perewt.) 0 0 98 ocrass' Butter —.- Bacon rigs 45 (I 46 0 Salt. Dial" ..... 11 • Coals 1 1 2 "t." .7E — TS. HAMBUR;ti MAK ( .1 0 Me ; 44 'it ellenburg Mag,kieburgh. . to , 11a ....... n to , 144 v't't to 1.. i. oats, ...•••••••• l o tr. .1 , ” ----.. Icilburg . j2O to j.,4 ......... . 03 to 1:36 Upland ........ qjb ,0.270 (pease,Meeklenborg •. 25 ti to 2e B Beans ................... 3 ,. 31 t o .?5.5 Muc k Wheat ........... ••• , 65 to 4;94 Rape: ccd, Hanover T 65 t . lU M a lt ..................... _ oil to Wares ........................ r 0 6 14 "ON. ,1!4 GitAIN. Wheat, Marks 405 to 498 Dark'' , --- Magdeburg: vai to 468; Anhalt, I , lllllk 4:35 to 516 1 red X.'s to 466 Bruns% ick -05 to 4:,63 -- Mecklenburg 31.8 to •;961- ---- Poll IT 450 to 5251--- - -- Holstein Rye, Mecklenburg t• 34 to = .l 3i :4!i to u7t) and nigsburg -- Pomeranian -- Anhift .243 to .•476 Carolina and Tennessee 714 to I 1 Georgia, mat 9d 6'4 3d and 4th 414 0 COFI 13 to 13% 4 i A %anal ra ......... . 244 5 % Bahia c1.16A (W,itl Ilarannah, Wilily...—. 3 to 3% Brown :2% '2li l'io, White iirnw'u. M a nilla. MOW' ---- *'‘,-1;;.•:,:111.r.rn . ............... • Madra5.................... 5 . •5A ;'?" ik S u rat 4._ ...................... ,r 4 ' Domingo ..... .......... a ,EE. 4il'. Domingo . ...... 4 ........... :rt 1, ti (I:tyrii... ............... Vi z : P or to rtm0................. fig ,; H ava nna:: ..... .. .......... :6* u- .11 8, 3 .thr,count.) B a n ta , White ............... `2lU"git Brown ............... Pernam b uco , White ...1% Brown ...IN ,4 2% to --------."—--------=—_—__ ___ BlBi i k S. On the 191 h inst., at Dinder, Somerset, Mrs. Edwin Loie lh of a daughter. On the 18th inst., at :Milton -terrace, New-road, Rochester, the lady of A. .1. L. Peebles, E5q.,596 Ilegiment,of a daughter. On the 18th inst., at Croxteth, the Countess of Sefton. of a son. • . ______—.....z.....--....-........—--....,,t............-.,, Londcw. Printed and Pub:it:heti by MURDO No, I t',.3tra.o.tl. at Th.:: SZth. °elite, No. 112, Strarc) the County of Aliddlesex, Thursday, April 21, 1842. 1 111 HALL . eeee t estify Wo pre rk inn 59, N.B. Wer t SCR /13 ' P'et ful Rill t a k, tvp Th, ...________ 8 A 1 Mou e ;ft the 'LIRE] Inters . a ny Above 6 Ab ove 9 "'tent Id( h ranted ritent dei hole p tliarnel 'tent del h 1 hole thld (ha 11. 11er of N. B. s 11, V. and ti A T - kild 42 4t ion of h ost , beau of Sil E kith iti e4 l•c ti al TAE Spo bDer doz. de. Kniv k' a illt Laid Lai tj Witt G*cdiar . O, than eb h e V cb'geicuorma 10 enJ,O4lll. L,)n, hest Ina ma in tilt .4 "n I fitted Vh!lesal age In I, ,!arne dz C 1 PAT] l b OX i e e S i of tha lit, of are it i l ,Lgafe ii — y a r Lt:!:'1•1 1 AT