The Sun. — London, England, 1834-10-28 00:00:00

be apparent to all that every improvement which is beneficial to the public, must inflict injury on some few' individuals. Acknowledging, however, the im portance of railway communication, it cannot be too often pressed on the attention of the Legislature how reat care should be exercised by them, while grant ing Bills for their establishment by private companies, that the public interests be in no way sacrificed to the personal and selfish views of the speculators, and that In establishing these lines of roads the smallest possi ble inconvenience to individuals, and the least possible sacrifice of the rights of private property, should be allowed; and it appears to us to be desirable, particu larly when we recollect of what materials, and in what manner, too, many of our Parliamentary Committees Are composed, that a general Act, containing some definite and well-digested provisions with respect to railways, should be passed as early as possible in the next session. The almost absolute necessity for Durham of the support of the "people of Ireland " (of himself, Daniel O'Connell, to wit), and next assures the said people of Ireland of the support they' are to receive from Lord Durham this will, we think, be admitted, when the numerous notices for new roads of this descriptions are con sidered. Some provisions should be made, in order to protect the metropolis and its suburbs from being too much cut up by such roads ; and if it should be provided, as we think it ought to be, that there should not be more than four or five, or, at the most, six railways entering London, and that no increase should be allowed on that number till twenty miles distant from London, it will be necessary that certain general rules should be made to regulate the transit of the carriages of other Companies on the roads not be longing to them ; for we should not deem it advisable that subsequently-established Companies should be quite left to depend on the tender mercies, or liberal feelings of those whose line of road they may be com elled to join. The foregoing remarks are chiefly called forth by the meeting of the proprietors and shareowners in the London and Southampton railway on Friday last. Whatever may have been our opinion during the contest which was carried on last Session by this Company and that of the Western Railway to Bris tol—however much more desirable it might then have appeared to us that the railway should have been made on the proposed line of road to Reading, instead of Basingstoke, we can now have no hesitation in saying that, as the Southampton Company have succeeded in convincing Parliament (and, we must assume, properly, particularly after the inveterate opposition which they experienced) that the road by the way of Basingstoke was practicable, no other line to Bristol or to any place south of it, out of the metropolis, should be granted. By thus compelling the Bristol Company to join at Basingstoke there will be 46 miles ready made for them, and the expense of this distance, and the destruction to private property over nearly the same distance, will be saved ; and by Basingstoke to Bristol, the line, we understand, will be as short as by any other line which has been projected, or, at any rate, not more than four or five miles longer. The claim of the Bristol Company to secure to itself a distinct and complete line of road the whole way appears to us untenable. The accident of another Company having secured the first 46 miles of this road, is one to which we think they must submit ; for we would ask, if Bristol can claim their separate road the whole way, may not every other large city or town do the same ? Is it not also a claim quite con trary to the practice of the country with respect to turnpike roads, which stand on precisely the same foot ing ? Hitherto trusts have been contented to take portions of roads. Is not the road from London to York broken into numerous distinct trusts, and joined by as many more, totally distinct in their interests, in the course of its progress ? And such it appears to us must be the case with respect to railroads. In making the above observations we would merely add, that as to the respective merits of either of these Com panies we know nothing ; as to their being likely to pay the proprietors we know as little ; but as we per ceive, by advertisements in the papers, that the Bristol Company intend to apply again, in the next Session, for a distinct line, we consider it our duty to call the attention of Members of the Legislature and of the country in general, to this subject, which is daily be coming one of the greatest importance.—Morning Herald. We should have thought after what has occurred that when Lord Grey's friend and Baronet, Sir John Key, with a very laudable degree of fortitude deter mined upon retaining his Aldermanic gown, to the glory and honour of the city of London, because he could not legally be deprived of it, he also might 'have made up his mind to avoid the commission of any acts in his Magisterial capacity likely to attract public notice. The less Sir John Key is heard of the better for himself and for those great personages in whose affection and esteem he once rejoiced. That Mr. Haydon, the painter, felt this when he painted that splendid thousand pounds' worth of portraits, of decanters, hock-glasses, and dessert-plates, which about this period no doubt, graces one of the darkest cellars of Howick, is most certain ; for al though Sir John Key is the hero of that beautiful work of art, his name was most carefully omitted in the illustrative catalogue, which did almost as much credit to Mr. Haydon's pen as the work it professed to describe does to his pencil. We suspect the omis sion of the Right Honourable Baronet's name in this work was made at the suggestion of his greatest friend. No matter ; we merely mention the fact in order to show that even those most interested in his welfare are anxious that the name of Sir John Key should be as little and as seldom obtruded upon public notice as possible. It appears, however, that this person, less cautious and considerate himself than those are who pity the unfortunate position in which the virtuous reformer has placed himself, has chosen to decide that the infidel Carlile has a right to congregate crowds round his sedition and blasphemy ware house, by hanging out of one of his windows the effigies of a Bishop in his robes, labelled " spi ritual broker," and out of another window the figure of a layman, labelled " temporal broker," the front drawing-room windows of his house being left open, and the room empty, as if the furniture of the apart ment had been seized for church rates, which is not the case. This inflammatory and disgraceful exhibition, which creates vast crowds, and produces a great public nuisance, Sir John Key, Baronet has declared from the judgment-seat of the city to be perfectly justifiable. He has refused redress to the neighbours, who are in consequence obliged to keep their shops shut ; while the passengers, at least those who can pass, are sub jected to the inconveniences of a mob, and the search c ' surveillance of the pickpockets. If Sir John Key had kept himself in the more suitable shades of retire ment, he would have gone down to posterity as the friend of Lord Grey. His new attempt at mob-popu larity has made his state somewhat " less gracious," and he will be celebrated henceforth as the patron of Mr. Richard Carlile. As Dryden has it : " Moon, step behind some cloud; some tempest rise, And blow out all the stars that light the skies, To shroud his shame." [Morning Post.] The Irish impostor, finding he could make nothing of Lord Duncannon, has quitted the premises of the noble Viscount, and now knocks at Lord Durham's door. Like all mendicants, he begins to every one with the same story. A dose of flattery is first admi nistered, next comes the petition for alms, but on the gentleman refusing to give anything "to street beg gars, the visit ends with outrageous abuse, and the fellow scuds away to some other fishing-ground. So was it with the present Secretary for the Home Department—so is it with the ex-Lord Privy Seal. O'Connell commenced with beslavering Lord Dun cannon, and finished by calling him names. He moves off to Lord Durham, who, he is aware, can do nothing for him ; and if he could, we hope would un derstand better his own and the public interest. But what matters that ? Should the noble Earl disdain to hear him, he has only to cry loud enough, and there are plenty who will ; so when his attempt in that quar ter miscarries, and every thing else fails, Lord Durham will do for a peg to hang a curse upon, as well as if he were Prime Minister. We shall not clog our columns with the voluminous rubbish of the agitator's address to Lord Durham. But the first paragraph—the air of taw - adulation which breathes through it—the -s of its string of interrogato he Premiership with which it lot overpower the nerves of the tast afford him some amusement. tat especial paragraph, and one Id adventurer first assures Lord EFFECTS OY THE LATE GALES. " My Lord,—Do you understand the value and the im portance of the position in which you are placed ? Do you appreciate the station you hold in public estimation ? Are you aware that all those who desire and are determined' o ob tain the abolition of all public abuses, the alleviation of all public burdens, the redress of all real and substantial griev ances, the perfect freedom of conscience from pecuniary as well as legal fetters, the bringing home to every man's door cheap and expeditious justice—in fine, the amelioration of all public institutions ?—all those who desire to see this great empire become the example as well as the arbiter of the world—all, in short, who prefer to self-interest or to party the liberty and prosperity of the British and Irish people, look to you as the honest, uncompromising, and fearless statesman, who is the most fit, if not the only per son fit, to hold the first place in rank and in power in the councils of your Sovereign, in order to ensure the strength and safety of his throne and the happiness of the people. "As to Ireland, my Lord—l can answer to you for Ireland. She has but few benefactors, and you are of them. We remember with heartfelt, gratitude that when some of the Irish Peers betrayed, and the rest openly as sailed us, you stood atone in your opposition to the vilo Coercion Bill, even at the time when the Cabinet, of which your father-in-law was at the head, appeared unanimous in its support. This is not only an earnest, but a proof that you would, if you were in power, govern Ireland on pre cisely the same constitutional principles upon which you would govern Great Britain. " My Lord, the popular party in Ireland requires from you no more. They will not, and they ought not to be satisfied with less from any man." These compliments past, he proceeds to business, and a sad mess he makes of it. How to get himself out of the scrape of bringing about this approximation between an English nobleman and the " people of Ire land" without making a Repealer of the Noble Lord, or agreeing that the " people of Ireland" shall give up repeal altogether, is greatly perplexing to the learned match-maker : so he flounders through this question as fast as he can, and mounts the old grievance of Whig oppression towards Ireland. The chief source from which he draws his illustrations of this grievance is the Reform Bill, and its less popular structure in Ireland than here, a topic which he minces into an hundred subdivisions. Now if any impartial judge were to come from a distant quarter of the earth untainted by party fury, and. able to pierce at once through that cloud of mystification and false hood by which all political facts and characters in Ireland are distorted out of their natural shape, we should like to hear the opinion of such a person, as to which side—viz., that of democracy or the reverse —the Irish Reform Bill was upon. The abolition of the forty-shilling freeholds in that country, a freehold to which the unfortunate peasantry were indebted for three-fourths of their demoralization and ruin, formed part of the Bill for Catholic emancipation. It had nothing to do with the Reform Bill, and yet O'Con nell charges the non-restoration of that barbarous evil as a crime in the framers of the Bill for reforming Par liament 1 Is not the interest of the agitation party strong enough already ? Have not the mob poisoners a sufficient number of victims ? He complains that there is in Ireland a smaller proportion of electors as compared with the whole body of the people than in this country. The reason is because in Ireland there is, relatively to England, a much smaller town popula tion ; and, moreover, that in England a far greater portion of the inhabitants are fitted for the exercise of a political, or any other trust, than in Ireland, as well by property as by personal qualifications. But the grand offence of all is, that Scotland, by the Reform Bill, has obtained an increase of eight Members of Parliament, and Wales of four ; whereas Ireland has only had five more than she returned prior to the Re form Bill. But what miserable sophistry is this ? At whose expense did Scotland obtain her eight Members, and Wales her four—ay, and Ireland her five ? Why, at the expense of England. O'Connell is for ever assuming and insisting on the natural and indefeasible distinctness of Ireland from Great Britain. He argues for ever as if common laws and an incorporating union were nothing—that the " united kingdom" was all a fiction—the united church a fiction. He never fails to speak of Great Britain as one integral whole, or of England as one integral whole, and of Ireland as another, having separate rights and contrasted interests ; but he chooses to blind himself, or hopes to blind his readers, to the ridicule which this standing anti-British theory throws upon his argument against the Irish Reform Bill. If Ireland (as a whole) has gained only five members by that bill, how many has Great Britain (as a whole) obtained by it ? None. Not one. Great Britain has lost the five members whom . Ireland has gained. Once more, if the acquisition of five new members be an " insult," as O'Connell declares it is, to Ireland, how deep and mortifying must be the degradation which England suffers ; for instead of deriving an increase of her re presentatives from the Reform Bill, England has actually lost 17 of her former complement I the House of Commons, as a body, being just as numerous as before ; and England being the only loser. It is easy to declaim and make a noise, and move the bad passions of men, by misrepresentations, however im pudent and senseless ; but it is the worst of the human species who employ such means for purposes ex clusively selfish.—Times. In another part of this day's paper will be found a letter from the editor of the Edinburgh Review, Mr. Macvey Napier, in reply to that of Lord Durham, which we published a few days ago, in answer to an article which appeared in that publication. The answer of the Editor is in every respect worthy of him. He does not, of course, reveal the name of the writer the article complained of by Lord Durham, and for the special reasons that not being addressed upon the sub ject, he was not called upon to do so , a nd because if special confidence was placed in him, it was his bounden duty, as a man of honour, not to divulge it. Lord Dur ham may now, if he think fit, challenge the editor of the Edinburgh Review, and prove at the mouth of the pistol whether the statements in that publication be or be not correct ; but assuredly he has no right to complain that he has not received an answer from the quarter from which it ought to have come. Lord Durham has, in fact, gone somewhat too far, as well as too short of what became him upon the occasion, and we regret the circumstance, because we admire his principles, and have admired his consistency ; but magis amica veri tas,—it is not denied that he proposed, as Chairman of the Sub-Committee, the 201. franchise instead of the 101., which was ultimately carried, and that, too, after many years, as one might reasonably imagine, of serious and careful consideration of what an efficient Reform Act ought to be. We find no fault with his Lordship on this subject, for it required a very care ful inquiry to discover to what extent the 201. fran chise would liberalize the constituency of the coun try ; but we must say, with the Editor of the Edin burgh Review, that it is too bad of his Lord ship to complain of other people having been guilty of divulging Cabinet secrets, while he only was the first divulger of them i If the Editor of the Edin burgh Review prove anything, he proves unquestion ably that Lord Durham gave nearly all the information in point of fact, of which he has so loudly complained, and that the breach of confidence of which he com plains is quite as chargeable to him as to the par y (Lord Brougham) whom he accuses of having broketi Cabinet bulk. Mr. Napier's letter will, however, call for further explanation on the part of Lord Durham, and we wait patiently for it. In the meantime we have every reason to believe that more than one base in triguer has been at work to destroy the confidence and co-operation which we have every reason to believe would, but for the intrigue, half Tory, half Whig, have existed between Lord Durham and Lord Brougham.-- Morning Advertiser. DECLARATION OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF BORDEAUX• E A RTHQUAKE.—Angostura, June 10th.—The town of San Marino has just been visited by an awful cala mity. On the 30th of May last a volcano broke out among the mountains of the Caraccas, its irruption being preceded by an earthquake which has destroyed one half of the town, and so damaged the other, as to render it uninhabitable. No fewer than forty-five shocks were felt, but the first one or two being comparatively slight, the towns-people were thus warned of what was preparing, and had time to make their escape to the forests which cover the heights around the town, before the more violent and destructive concussions took place. O w i ng to the warni ng th us providentially received by the inhabit ants, the loss of life has not been so great as it would otherwise have been. The miseries and privations endured in the neighbouring forests by the houseless fugitives from the town are said to have been dreadful. THE SUN, LONDON, TUESDAY, OCTORER 28, 1834 Very disastrous aavices were received , at Lloyd's yesterday, respecting the damage sustained by the shipping, in consequence of the recent boisterous weather, and we regret to say that a fearful record of loss of life and property was received at that establish ment. The Ann Gales, Clapham, from London to St. Petersburg, was wrecked near the Texel; the crew and passengers saved. The Tasmania, Mannell, from St. Petersburg to London, was stranded near Calend soog, and the master drowned ; the cargo was saved. The Success, of Shields, bound to London, was abandoned near the North Foreland, being in a sink ing state. The Dahlia, Taylor, from Rio Janiero to Hamburg, was on sl:c :c near Egmond, on the 21st inst.; crew saved. The Marco Bozzaris, Adrian, from Batavia, was on shore on the Trendual, on the 21st inst., but expected to be got off. The Standard, Leiste, bound to Stockholm, was on shore at the Texel ; crew saved. The James, Lind say, bound to St. Petersburg, was wrecked at Born. holm. Tie Union, Gallaway, from Newcastle, bound to Harlingen, put into Ramsgate with cargo shifted ; loss of bulwarks, &c. The Goodwill, Langland, from Sunderland to Dordrecht, vitas stranded at Gandvoorst, eh' the 18th inst. ; crew sawed. The Rolla, B wan, from Baltimore to Amsterdam, was stranded at Wyk on-Zee, on the 18th ; crew saved. The Anna Catha rine, Koster, from St. Übes to Stockholm, was lost at the Helder on the 20th, stz.nd only one of the crew saved. The Mary Ann, Ward, from Gainsborough to London was run down on Saturday evening in Seareach, by the Eliza Jane, bound to the Cape of Good Hope. The Charlotte, Kinedson, from Wyburg, bound to Cette, has put into Harwich, -very leaky, much strained, with loss of windlass, &c., and must discharge. The Hope, Isabel, from Cork, hags arrived at Fowey, with loss of foremast, &c., and must discharge part of her cargo. The Adelaide, Wilson, for Newport , has put into Flushing, leaky, bound to Lynn. The Carel Wilhelm, Mackenwood, from Griefswold, has put into Helvoet, leaky, bound to Lisbon. The Betsey, Hunter, from Lynn to Leith, was totally wrecked near Alfoord, on the 25th inst., and only one of the crew saved. The Henrietta, Hoonstiff, from Caen to Tonsberg, was stranded at Bergen (North Holland), on the 17th instant. The Molly, Lassen, from Caen to Arundahl, was stranded. at Vlieland, 17th inst. ; crew saved. The Dolkfosten, Salvedon, from Havre to Grimstadt, was stranded at Terschelling, 19th inst.; crew saved. The Thomas, Lindeguard, from Medem black, was carried into Harlingen, with loss of masts, bound to England. The Solon, Hillary, from Laguna, put into Cuxhaven, in a damaged state, after being on shore, bound to St. Petersburg. The Industry, Mil som, from Caen to Tonsberg, was lost at Petten on the 18th inst. ; crew saved. The Einighiden, Bish olm, from Amsterdam to St. Übes, was stranded the 18th inst., at Petten, and it was feared would be to tally lost; the crew drowned. The Susanna, Ipsen, from Bordeaux to Altona, was stranded at Scheven ingen, on the 18th instant. The Fortuna, Ze phen, from Bordeaux_ to St. Petersburg, was lost at Wyk-on-Zee, on the 19th instant ; crew saved. The Guardian, Flatten, from Sunderland to Rotterdam, was stranded near Catwyk, on the 18th inst. The Surinamesche Vriend, Lange, from Suri nam to Amsterdam, was totally lost near Catwyk, on the 18th inst. The Shamrock, Crossman, from Hull to Berwick, was on shore on Grimsby Flats, on the 25th instant, with loss of anchors and cables. The Providence of Ipswich, the Bess of Colchester, and the Hawk of Sunderland, were on shore on the Spurn on the 25th inst., with loss of anchors and cables. The Four Woodmen, Potts, from Newcastle to Dor drecht, was totally lost on the Banjar, on the 18th ; crew saved. The XL. Lowther, from Sunderland to Schiedam, was wrecked near West Cassel. The Marie Sophie, from Cette to Copenhagen ; the Maltas, Fors ter, from Sunderland to Shoreham ; the Gustav, Ans trom, from St. Übes to Stockholm ; and the Albertus, Schultz, for St. Übes, were totally wrecked near Calais. The Resolution, Hayhow, from Shields to Wells, was driven on shore near Waterford, on Friday. The Goningen, Welwart, Luiges, from Liver pool to Harlingen, was on shore near Petten, on the 21st inst. ; and the Humility, Adamson, from Lon don, has put into Ramsgate with the cargo damaged, and part thrown overboard, bound to Selby. Extract of a letter, dated Harwich, Oct. 26 : " Late last evening the Scotia, steamer, Captain Bouch, arrived from Rotterdam, for Hull, short of coals, having been obliged to resort to the vessel's yards, bulkheads, and part of the cargo (bark) for fuel. This morning the William the Fourth, Knocker, left for Hull. Wind N.N.E., fresh breeze. The Ann and Jane, with the Scotia, remain." The Netherlands' Steam Company's packet the Batavier, which left Rotterdam for London on Tues day, was compelled, by the severity of the gales, after having approached, as it was reported, within 10 miles of the North Foreland, to put back to Helvoetsluytz, and got in on Thursday. Some accident having oc curred to some part of the machinery of the Batavier, she was under the necessity of returning to Rotterdam, but unfortunately took the ground in the river, and had not succeeded in getting off at the date of the last advices. A letter received yesterday morning at the office of the General Steam Navigation Company for their agent at Calais, states that a Swedish schooner and an English collier were on shore on the French coast. Both vessels were totally lost, but the crews were saved, with the exception of three Swedes, who were unfor tunately drowned. 0 DECLARATION OF THE COMMERCIAL BODY OF BORDEAUX, DATED OCT. 20, 1834. The following is a summary of this important do cument : " The undersigned merchants composing the free Committee of the Commerce of Bordeaux, think it their duty to lay before their fellow-citizens the fol lowing declaration, which is a summary of their prin ciples, their projects, and their hopes : " A project of law upon customs, based upon the most absolute doctrines of the protective system, was presented to the legislative Chambers last session. This law, which affected to lay down the principle even of restrictive abuses, as the eternal foundation of the system of economy, proclaimed thereby, would have obtained, in the elective Chamber, a majority which was already designated by the choice of the members of the committee, and its report. Nevertheless, this law fell to the ground before its own absolutism—it died before coming to maturity, having been stricken by a kind of instinctive and national disapprobation, which had been awakened by the commercial remonstrances of which the petitioners of the Gironde had given the signal. Not only so, but the pow er f u l men who had suggested the principal provisions of this project of law, although still in posseesion of all their means of action, and Government influence, had not the courage to make use of it to dictate the ter ms o f a secon d pro ject drawn up in the same spirit as that of the first. Thus the Minister of Commerce remained in a state of hesitation, without any avowed system ; and he mani fested the intention of consulting the country, in order that he might afterwards decide, from the facts he might ascertain by this investigation, as to what sys tem it would be advisable henceforth to adopt as to commercial legislation. " This inquiry is in itself nothing but an eminently barren proceeding, if the immediate effect thereof alone be taken into consideration. But,as a symptom of dis organization and of debility in the restrictive system, which hitherto had triumphed constantly and immea surably, it may afford some hope to the friends of social progress and commercial freedom. " We think it right to point public attention to this double character of the investigation now set on foot by M. Duchatel, before the superior Council of Commerce. " This inquiry is, of itself, vain and barren. Its only effect will be to accumulate exceptional and hos tile facts presented with a view to conflicting interests, and which, as they arise from a system of privilege, will claim a continuation of that privilege, as an inte gral part of those interests that have been created thereby. Such an inquest will not throw light upon facts—it will render them obscure. " The interests that have proceeded from commer cial liberty are expiring ; the restrictive system stifles patronizing adulation vvl melodramatic abruptness erAiiirtie bribe of ti :r!••• f: , ~ t 4thet y do m tt "oill el s . t lea:: if' s lo.li - 4eXa rye a tha k ',. ,trr . `,:Ate;tit rnei 4i . ;,•, '` ,;,'''' C -E ' -----r-4-'.C.c, t7y, ty .. -Ii; , 4.;N them ; they have nothing to bring forward but souve nirs and regrets. The privileged interests, on the contrary, are in their full force and glory ; they are in possession of the ground ; they have access to the ear of power, and the - support of the Government capi talists. Such a struggle is too unequal : they have fortune on their side, and we have merely justice Their voices must, therefore, necessarily prevail in the investigation. " The IVlinister will, in the midst of this interested clamour, find himself without a compass to steer by ; he will not be able to grant protection without destroy ing liberty, and he cannot re-establish commercial liberty without striking at the root of protection ; and thus floating between the principle of prohibition and that of admission, he will fall into the most enervating position that any former legislator ever had the impru dence to plunge himself into. " In fact, prohibition and liberty, protection and competition, are irreconcilable. These facts, no matter by what investigation they may be established, will never serve to lead to the discovery of a reconciliation — that is impossible. It is to the demonstration of this very impossibility that will destroy the notions of those by whom the inquiry has been set on foot ; and this is the result upon which we rest our hopes for the future welfare of the country. For when the public shall be well convinced, by the result of this inquiry, that the commercial economy of the country cannot be carried on upon the double principle of privileged protection and jive admission, they will be forced to make a final choice between those two principles ; for a legislation without principles, or, what is worse, having at the same time two principles in action which are destroy ing each other, would be the height of shame, and the most severe of all scourges. " The question once placed in this light, a fruitful career would be opened to us ; for until the eternal rules of human nature shall be changed, the restrictive principle cannot be adopted by a civilized Government for its beacon and its compass. " We therefore shall remain perfect strangers to the present investigation before the Council of Commerce ; but we will profit by the inquest against itself, in order to discover in the pretensions of the monopolists and defenders of privileges, arguments in favour of com mercial liberty ; and when the Chambers shall be assembled, we will address ourselves to public opinion by every constitutional means, to prove by what gra dations liberty may be introduced, without confusion, nto the commercial legislation of the country." (Here follow the signatures.) SURREY SESSIONS, OCT. 27. EXTRAORDINARY CASE. The following case excited great interest in consequence of the serious nature of the charge against four persons of respectability, and the Court was crowded during the whole of the day. Mr. James Islett Halding, a pianoforte maker, and Mr. Charles Wadsworth, a solicitor's clerk, were indicted for stealing in the dwelling house of Mr. W. Haines Jones, a vast quantity of property, consisting of pianofortes, organs, a harp, and various articles of household furniture ; and Mr. Charles Smith, coppersmith, and Mr. Martin Wind cape, a man of independence, were indicted for receiving a portion of the property knowing it to have been stolen. Mr. Chambers conducted the case for the prosecution, and Mr. Adolphus, Mr. Clarkson, Mr. Jemmett and Mr. Maclean, that for the defence. . The prosecutor had sometimes passed by the name of William Haines, but William Haines Jones was his real name. The prisoner Halding lived with him, as did his housekeeper, Ann Kent, and her daughter Amelia. On the evening of the 10th of September by previous arrange ment they were all to go to Vauxhall Gardens. The pro secutor and the two females left his house in Stanhope place, Southwark Bridge-road, to go to his workshop at Vauxhall, where they were to wait for Halding, who had previously gone elsewhere, and taken the key of the house with him. They waited at Vauxhall until very late at night, and finding he did not come to them they returned home, and not been able to get admittance the door was forced open, and all the property named in the indictment, to the value of nearly 1001. gone. A great part of the goods were afterwards traced to, and found at, a house be longing to the prisoner Windcape, in Essex, and in which Smith also lodged. On the road to that house he and the officers met the prisoner Smith in a gig, and on telling him the nature of their business lie instantly conducted them to the house in question, and pointed out the property which he said Windcape had purchased from Halding for 181., showing at the time a receipt for the same. The whole of the property found was then brought away by the officers. In the prosecutor's cross-examination it appeared that he had lived in various places in the name of Haines, and that he had been in difficulties and arrested, and thrown into Whitecross-street prison. Mrs. Kent had frequently been called Mrs. Haines, and her daughter Miss Haines, but he had never contradicted it. He was also examined concerning a person named Peter Wilson, and denied that he had given that person his acceptance, but said he had offered his gua rantee, which was not accepted. He admitted also that at two or three places which he had left he had not paid his rent. He had been arrested by Wilson, but got out of prison by supersedeas. In all the prisoner's transactions, however, he admitted that he had not gone by the name of Jones. A paper being produced as an authority for Hald ing to dispose of some property for his (Halding's) use, he denied that the signature was his, When he removed from Vauxhall he carried away two cart loads of property to his new lodgings in the house of Piper, a policeman, who was previously concerned in the apprehension of the prisoners. He had found out that Halding had taken the house in Stanhope-place in his own name. He (the prosecutor) always slept at Vauxhall. John Baddington, the driver of the van, took the goods in question from the house in Stanhope-place to that of Mrs. Weatherby, in Duke-street, Stamford-street. He identified Halding as being one of the persons assisting in their removal, but did not see either Smith or Windcape. Mrs. Weatherby, of Duke-street, stated that on the morning of the 10th of September, Wadsworth and a lady partially agreed to take lodgings of her, and said that the goods would be late that evening coming in owing to their being brought from the country. At ten o'clock at night the men came with the goods. Halding with other persons also came with them and assisted in unloading the vehicle. To her surprise at three o'clock the following day they were carried away again in a van without previous notice. Several other witnesses were examined, from whose tes timony it appeared that from Mrs. Weatherby's house the goods were conveyed by another van to Mr. Windcape's house in Essex, and there Mr. Smith assisted in unloading them ; that when the policeman and the prosecutor met Mr. Smith, he took them to the house, pointed out the goods, and showed Halding's receipt to prove that Wind cape had purchased the property for 181. The prisoner Halding declined saying any thing in his defence. The other two prisoners (Smith and Windcape), put in written defence, declaring their entire innocence of the ac cusation made against them, and that they were together at the Half Moon, in Leadenhall-market, when Halding came in and offered the goods in question for sale for 20/. ; that Windcape went with Halding to look at the goods, and ultimately agreed to purchase them for 181. ; that he then sent them to his house in Essex, and received a re ceipt for the money. Joshua Hudson, landlord of the Half Moon, Leaden hall-market, and Barnard Levi, a watchmaker, were pre sent in the house when Halding offered the furniture to Windcape for sale. Two appraisers were called, who, by the desire of the Magistrates at the public office, had valued the property seized by the officers at Mr. Windcape's house. They considered 18/. a fair price for it. A vast number of witnesses of highly respectable appear ance, who had known Smith and Windcape for various pe riods up to twenty-five years were called, and they spoke in the highest possible manner of the character of these two persons. The Jury found a verdict of Guilty against Halding and Wadsworth, and acquitted Smith and Windcape. The sentence was deferred. Mr. Abbott, the Under-Sheriff, applied for the goods to be delivered up to him as the Sheriff's representative. Mr. Windcape claimed them as his property, having paid for them. The CHAIRMAN, on being apprised that they were still in the possession of the police-officers, declined to make any order upon the subject. SINGULAR ACCIDENT.—We regret to state that, by a most extraordinary oc currence , C a pt a i n C u nningham has been deprived of four fine hunters, which were standing in his stable at Wellesbourn. It appears that a brewing copper is erected so that the flue runs up close to the wall of the stable : last week this had been used in brewing for two successive days, and on Thursday evening it was discovered that the heat of the flue had ignited a piece of wood in the stable wall, and turned the smoke with a smouldering fire (which did not break into a blaze at all) into the stable. The stall of the best horse was next to this part, and the poor animal had its ears burnt c ompletely off; the oth er th ree h o rses were suffocated without being burnt in the slightest degree. The whole of them died. We are assured that the four horses were valued at LOON. ; while the iny to the stable does not amount to mo re than a bout 211 .— Warwick Advertiser. ILFORD (ESSEX) PETTY SESSIONS.—Oc'r. 25. IMPORTANT DECISION UNDER THE POOR LAW AMENDMENT BILL. About the middle of last month an application was made to R. W. Hall Dare, Esq. M. P., the Chairman, and a full bench of Magistrates, sitting in Petty Sessions at the Angel Inn, Ilford, by Mr. Griffin, the vestry clerk, and the officers of the parish of Barking, for an order to pass a pau per, named Wheeler, who had become chargeable to that pa rish, to the parish of Layton, in the same county, as it was contended that he legally belonged to the latter parish. The pauper Wheeler, it appeared, had been bound by the officers of the parish of Layton to a fisherman then residing at Bark ing, named Gardener. During the term of his apprentice ship the master of Wheeler became embarrassed, so that he was compelled to sell off his smacks, and become himself a servant to another owner. Wheeler, in consequence was thrown on the parish of Barking ; but the term of his ap prenticeship not having expired at the time of the passing of the Poor Law Amendment Bill, the officers of Bark ing grounded their application for an order for his removal to the parish of Layton on the 67th section of the Bill, which states—" And be it further enacted, that from and after the passing of this Act no settlement shall be acquired by being apprenticed in the sea service, or to a house holder carrying on the trade of the sea as a fisherman or otherwise ; nor by any person now being such an appren tice in respect to such apprenticeship." And it was urged that by the wording of this clause the pauper had not gained a settlement in the parish of Barking, and that, therefore, he should be passed to Layton, to which parish he legally belonged. The Bench at the time would have at once granted the order, but the opinion expressed by Mr. Sterry, their clerk, induced them to alter their's, and they refused to grant the order, but at the same time recommended,at the question was one of considerable importance to the parish, that a case might be laid before some high legal authority, and his opinion obtained on it. The recommendation of the Bench in this particular was complied with, and at the close of the ordinary business before the Bench on Saturdaylast, the subject was inciden tally alluded to, and Mr. Sterry informed the Magistrates that the parish officers had obtained the opinion of the At torney-General, and that it was quite is unison with that expressed by him (Mr. Sterry) when the case came before the Bench, and stating that the Magistrates had acted per fectly right in refusing the order. The Chairman, in refusing to sign the order for the re moval of the pauper (Wheeler), acted more in respect to the strong opinion expressed by Mr. Sterry than in com pliance with his own judgment. He then and still thought, notwithstanding his respect for the opinion of the Attorney- General, that the order of removal should have been granted. The Rev. Mr. FANSHAW, one of the Magistrates, thought that the order of removal ought to have been signed. The following is a copy of the opinion given on the point by the Attorney-General : " After duly attending to all the arguments urged by the parish officers of Barking, I entirely concur with the view taken of this question by the Magistrates at. Ilford. We must see whether the Legislature has used language to show an in tention to take away a settlement actually acquired. Now the 67th section of the Poor Law Amendment Act appears to me to be merely prospective. The pauper has not gained a settlemen , in Barking since the passing of the Act ; but he had one be fore, and to that he is still entitled. ' " Temple, Oct. 17, 1834." " J. CAMPBELL." POLICE INTELLIGENCE. BO W-STREET. Catherine Hillier, a respectable looking middle-aged woman, was yesterday placed at the bar, charged with forging an order for the payment of 4631. 165., with intent to defraud Messrs. Drummond and Co. The particulars of this case have already been before the public on the first examination. It had been adjourned for the purpose of taking the deposition of Lord Stradbroke, wh6 was ont of town at the time of her apprehension. The prisoner had been in his Lordship's service, and in drawing the cheque, it purported to bear the signature of Lord Stradbroke. - . His Lordship had given no authority to any person to affix his signature, nor was it his Lordship's handwriting. The prisoner was fully committed for trial. MARLBORO UGH-STREET. NAPOLEON'S TAlLOR.—Yesterday an elderly man of the name of Jackson, was brought before Mr. CHAMBERS, charged with being found in the street in a state of intoxi cation. _ _ A police constable proved finding the defendant drunk, and incapable of taking care of himself. Mr. CHAMBERS—What are you ? Defendant—l have been in the army. Mr. CHAMBERS—Are you not a tailor ? Defendant—l am ; but I spent the greater part of my life in the army, and was out in India in the 66th Regiment of Foot for several years. On my being discharged the vessel in which I returned to Europe touched at St. Helena, and, being in troduced to, the Emperor Napoleon, I was engaged as his tailor, and worked for the Emperor up to the period of his death. I then came to London, and foolishly spent the money which I saved while at St. Helena. For some time past I have been out of employment, and the cause of my taking a little too much was in consequence of meeting with a friend on Saturday. Mr. CHAMBERS—I never let drunken tailors off without paying the fine. Defendant—l hope, Sir, you will read this paper before you inflict the fine (at the same time handing a document over to Mr. Chambers). Mr. CHAMBERS—It states that you are a most excellent tailor and can obtain plenty of work ; besides you have a pension. Defendant-4 have no pension now, and there is no work to be obtained. Finding the Magistrate was determined to inflict the fine, the body tailor of the ex-Emperor paid the fine and left the office. James Dear, a rather respectable looking man, was charged with begging in Regent-street A constable deposed to seeing the prisoner ask several persons for relief, on which he took him into custody. Mr. CHAMBERS—Cannot you find any other way of liv ing, than by going about begging ? Defendant—l have no other way of keeping myself and family. Mr. CHAMBERS—Where do you belong to ? Defend ant—My place of settlement is Manchester. Upon the death of my father I succeeded to some property, and went to live at Liverpool, where I kept a public-house. Some time back I was exchequered for 3001., and tlie whole of my property was carried away. Since then I have been to Manchester, but not being able to do anything there I came to London ; but no success has attended me, and at present I have no alternative but to beg. Mr. CHAMBERS—If you are so destitute as you repre sent, why not apply to the parish ? Defendant—l have ; but since the new Poor Law Amendment Bill has come into operation, the parish in which I and my family are liv ing have refused to grant me the least assistance. Mr. CHAMBERS—If I discharge you, will you promise not to be found begging again ? This the defendant pro mised, and he was accordingly discharged. CHRISTENING AN IRISHMAN. —Three Irish labourers and two females were charged with being drunk, and cre ating a disturbance in the streets. On the charge being proved, the defendants said they were not very much in liquor. Mr. CHAMBERS—You ought to be ashamed of your selves to get drunk on a Sunday. One of the females here observed that she trusted they would be excused, as it occurred from their being to the christening of a fellow-countryman. Mr. CHAMBERS—Christening an Irishman! What cus tom is that ? Female—lt is a thing which is always done on an Irishman coming to this country. Mr. CHAMBERS—HOW is it done? Female—On the arrival of any person all his friends carry him a gallon or half a gallon of beer, or some whiskey, which we drink to wards his success. Mr. CHAMBERS—And you will call that christening an Irishman ? Female—Yes. Mr. CHAMBERS—Were all drunk ? Constable—They would all have gone away, but for Macarty, who was very violent. Mr. CHAMBERS—He must pay five shillings, and I will discharge the other four. Macarty, not being able to pay the fine, was detained. QttnUoEwEotiFTRIOREU. DREADFUL S DRIVING.----Yes terday Sands End, Fulham, was brought aßEAGDerourgLe ACCIDENT of QUEEN F s a . up in custody, and placed at the bar before Mr. GREGORIE, charged with being drunk, and furiously driving a horse and cab, whereby a young girl, named Ellen Hayes, about 12 years of age, was knocked down in the road, and so seriously injured that great fears are entertained for her life. The prisoner said nothing in his defence, and was re manded until the fate of the child is known. Christovher Johnson, a private in the Coldstream regi ment of I oot Guards, was brought up for final examination before Mr. BURRELL, charged with having in his possession a quantity of implements for coining, and also several piecas of counterfeit coin. _ Police constable Goose, of the B division, No. 55, on last Thursday week, the 16th instant, went with Inspector Banister and police constable Clifton, to No. 1, Pound place, Rochester-row, Tothill-fields. The front door was opened ; they went up stairs to the two-pair front room and rapped at the door, which was opened by the prisoner, who was in his shirt sleeves. There was a little girl and a boy in the room, and the prisoner's wife was in bed. They im mediately commenced a search, and underneath the fire place he found a plaster of Paris mould for making a shil- ling and a sixpence. There was at the time-a very Alt fire in the grate. He then searched the prisoner's trun a ' l and found a quantity of plaster of Paris an d a file. 1,11,. drawer he found an iron spoon with white metal i n it. hie, prisoner, on being questioned, said that the room was and that a man had brought the articles found, a nd asL e him to keep them for him. Mr. Inspector Banister confirmed the above statement to Goose finding the things produced in the prisoner's rowom. The prisoner was fully committed for trial , and the it . nesses were bound over to prosecute. LAMBETH-STREET. Yesterday a man whose appearance betokened want all e wretchedness applied to Mr. WALKER for his interferesc to compel the officers of the parish in which he r sided to give him some trifling relief. The applicant owing to illness was unable to work 0 earn anything for his support, and after parting with ev r ,_ l , little thing he had, he applied to the Overseers of the veto' but they refused to do anything for him. , ° Mr. WALKER—What parish is it? Appiicant--Th r parish of Whitechapel, your Worship ; and I hope P u 'Worship will do something for me, as I am actually stars and have had nothing to eat since yesterday but an apple. Mr. WALKER—There is no use in you r coining h e re ; l we can do nothing whatever for you. We h ave no Po" to compel the parish officers to relieve you. The applicant then left the Justice-room. outer office he said his name was James Fitzpatrick ; 0 he was an Irishman, and having served for many that if the navy, enjoyed a pension of 241. per annum, so argent thai the parish officers relieved his present apparently ~, necessities, they would have abundant Opportunity of rep t , ing themselves on the Ist of January next, when the _ 0 , year's pension would be due and paid. The overscer,Vl_ ever, refused to have any thing whatever to do with 12, 1 : . to the At , and thence it was that he was obliged to apply and in th th a e t gistrates. THAMES POLICE. „ wo e; Yesterday the sitting Magistrate, Mr. Colo% t cupied for several hours in the investigation of a hro:r, cutting and maiming preferred against an Irish coalwPl„Ptlon, named Murphy, who was brought up for re-00" n„;nwt, charged with making a most determined and savage to murder John Hallisey, by stabbing him in the 0411 a knife on the 18th instant. Rai Mr. COMBE fully committed him for trial on the cap charge of cutting and maiming. LONDON MARKETS. PRICE OF BREAD. 41 1 %,,T0; The highest price of Bread in the Metropolis is RI. for ce , halfv en There are others who sell from a half-penny to three . that rate. PRICE OF SEEDS.-0c! 27. Per Cwt. New English Red Clovers2s. COs 655 St. Foin ................... „v., : 41 :,;‘, ON Ditto Ditto —s. —B, —s Rye Grass. .............. • .•.. 41 , New Foreign Ditto -iss. 6i , s. (5s Pacey Grass ............... :-...1, 5,5.7,5 Old Ditto Ditto —s. 3Ss. His Linseed, fir feeding • ..„,. 's' 0. New White Cloier sos. Os. 60s Ditto, for sowing—. ...... 0 445 ,o, Old Ditto Ditto —s 503 fOs Ditto, for el inhing. ..... .... 4 , 5 4 , 4 43, New Trefoil 2ns 225. 26s Canary . ..................... _. 5E4 OADitto —s. 165..V25. Hemp .................... . ....... -5.0 Rib Grass —s —s —s Per Bushel. 0a 4 0 nt English Carraway —s 635. 6t3s. White Mustard...... m, , & Per Quarter....._ ..... 4 ;.•" 4 4 . • Foreign Ditto....— —s sfis. fiOs Brown Ditto .........160. : - ",d, L' , ' Coriander —s ISs 2fts. Winter Tares ....... , z . : ,/ "7 Rapeseed, English fine (per Last) 201. :).3 , • • ..... ForeiC PRICES OF HOPS —Oct. 27 , to VI of K.nt rockets (p , r cwt.) - n , to 0- Choice Kent Bagdis.tto 6.i Os. 0 ~ 06 . 8 ,to 5.. 6, ' . o n 0. Sussex Pockets Superfine ditto O Duty rated at 170,0.0 _.,, , PRICE OF OIL Rape Oil, brown, per ton,—Refined—Lins tan, Lin.eed Oil Cake at the Mill, ;WOO , 12/, 12s --Rape Cake , F . . eed Oil OF PRICES OF LEATHER d Sod 0 Per lb d to d , Per lb IS, 9 6 Crop Hides, 30 to 401 b each 11 13 ' Horse Hides, German ".... 2. 5 3 -- -to 50 12 M ---- Spanish, .. ;. IS g 4 50 6U - ( 0 ' 1 ,1 7 ~ t) Bull Hides Butts, Vitriol - -- 50 ei ..... ...."'sji jo - English . - --- 70 10 0 . .........• 1 J 3 ..... , - 7 - Foreign Foreign Hides 11 15 Kips ................................ I ,' A Dressing Hides loi 13 -- small .......... ''' .. 1 4 1 3 Shaved ~ 6 , , 1 5 Be,t Saddlers Hides .. -- ...... / Horse Hides, English • If rounded 2d to 4d per lb more WkIITECHAPEL HAY_ MARKET.,-;(2c.t.a iy 75s id. to 100 s tid i Clover .. ..... ~... Straw 288 • d to 3'2s. it i E 1. 1) mt. PRICES OE POTATOES AT SPIT.ALf.--- rt - Kidneys (York) from vessel vi. Os. to 31. ;L s ' alto Scotch Reds ditto . 0 / 10s. to 3 1 . ''„''• d itto Common Reds '2l. Os. to 21. 1 03 • d itto Shaws 2 lie. to v. 10i. Ito Middling . l/. 10s. to 01• ditto __.:21:1 Chats 11 ss. to 111. • ..i. PRICE OF RAW F Price of Tallow (aa stated by the T 4 PRICE OF TALLOW Town Tallow 46s. 6d. Yellow Russia White —s. Od. Soap Ditto s. Od Melting Stuff ........ 31s Od Ditto Rough 2os. Od PRICE OF The price of good Store Candles it Candles, per dozen, 7s Od ; ir. Sixpence per dozen COAL MAR Per Ton s. d Adair's l9 0 Benaham Main l7 0 Bishop's Main l6 6 East Percy lB 3 Felling Main l7 6 Holywell l9 3 Ord 's Redhugh l7 0 Pew, lB 0 Pontop Windsor . , lB 3 Ditto, Stanhope and ** Tyne Company Thipcote l5 6 Tanfield West Hartley Lambton's Primrose Dixon's Butterkuowl. l9 Cowpen Hartley IS 0 ... ,B 0 ..... Walls End Bell, Robson & Co. 1:1 0 Walls End Bewicke and Co.— 11 li Ships arrived since 'AT, per stone of tlb• allow &Idlers) ............. SOAP, &e per ll l ''' . Yellow Soap .... ...... .... ,s ~,•... Mottled ................ Curd .............................. ea Gray es .................... 56. Good Dregs .............. .. CANDLES. M f °ll°ll' I the Retail Shwas el fa. deg ferior, discount for 0 .E I.—Oct. al) 6 0 l'er Tort Wells End Carr an d ' 0 ~" 'l ,l 0 Walls End Gosfortn .. gl 0 Walls End Heaton ••• ......... 51 • Walls End Hilda ....... y l 0 Walls End Hotsp ur . j s o a• e. g Walls End KilV , s Walls End Northulnlingww" run". 51 0 5 Walls End Rid d e ll's, l e ty- , Walls End Brad d Y ll' Walls End Baton ...... .... 0 Walls End Lambton,j'ettor:' g Walls End Russ el's 11 • Walla End Stewart 0 ,• ..... Walls End Aucitlanu*:.".....o .. Wags End Gordon ....... • Walls End Tees ................. I• 0 Walls End qi Walls End /lenders ... Heaton Trader ..• ' ast market -day, 104 00 ----•••••• MEETING OF CREDITORS AT TiIEopNST. BASINGHALL-STREET, TO-MORI' A. s ; it 1J (From the London Gazette.) ILPrice, grocer, Greenwich ................. ................... By the accounts from Basle, to the 19311 3 i 1 11.di. i ' find that the vintage had terminated well, and &it ' e on '''or• productive than usual. Notwithstanding this, .. i bl e •abl u e s th e t were on the advance, in consequence of e'dest"- chases having been made on speculation, from en, l be 0 3 ,5 t e r vt approaching adhesion of the Duchy of Bade n W I've° Prussian customs, would open an advan ta g e les in ; et• Little was doing in silk, and the orders for Ame r- aa O r 01 less than usual, as was also the case for the Geo e " SOO t he SUDDEN RISE OF THE TWEED.---"Tr1150/tick morning last, about eight o'clock, the Twee' f a ° l•o , grE r J i? rapidity of a mountain torrent, causing m uch 3 , 1 , dankering the lives of many individuals. Bu t e Foo . o ,bil 9t tressing accident we have heard of, happened at thi , , e i s o, Sprouston, where Charles Redpath, c arter , s ing t le o L pi'L crossing in charge of two of his own horse `' ' ll in t' e 113 was overtaken by the current before he could fr ° c bicr t site bank ; the carts were almost immediately 11. wheels, and with the horses carried down the rrn,tn f p r d the poor animals quickly perished, w hilst fl e( < al o ° J with great difficulty reached the bank• e q ect e bee; i n a most I • ll 7 e ti 1 . 0 511 1 t o' horses was about 35/. ; and thus, extraordinary manner, ' has an honest and indoLir'° hig3sei the 9 deprived of the means by which he stre rw- hout family : A person who rode across the river a.. ti tr,4°' 113" time, in charge of a led horse, got back with the olin ate 4 er i; culty, though not more than the lapse of f • the ri% taken place. The cause of this sudden sivell ° not yet known here. v A o b e ao b n e t e y A I', P'7, e MARBLED. On the 27th inst., at Waltham Abbey, Lewis Ale, s i te 6n r ."o e f . o f> Tl - Iwood Hall, near Halifax, to Jane, fourth dattirberio Vd d,,r ti , Moody, Esq., of Saugh Heads, near Longtown, C !"_„. to Lieut.-Colonel Moody, Co m m anding Royal Engin' haend23dniejDuekl°' John enesto.f, Captainot Beltonnally7e, N.B. to Dorothea, eldest daughter of the late John'llckwe' sosel On the 25th inst., at St. George's, Han2r!risbis; pier- Raynes, Esq., of Norfolk-street, Strand, to Sa only child of the late W. Duchatz, Esq. R.N., of Belton. sec O on n d th s e on 23 o d f --------------- et , On the 15th DIE 1) . R bet S PI 13" itunhistet;:laaitent PsLaryorriads: cit.hnhearitlesons.peNC'neilelria,mal_idocooio 001, Grace the Duke of Marlborough . aged 21, fourth son of Sir Thomas G Sta re nl ec e e ; St_r_ jo, ft.INI On the 15th inst ., at Exmouth, Captain Timothy (Ai in his 41st year. ea 14. 4 81 , On the 25th inst., at Stony Stratford, Miss Ilariseron,_ate _.er. On the 27th inst., in Acreplace, Mr. Robert Bak Aligo:co On the 26th inst., at West Wickham, Kent, Mr. r' --- f " ff rington, aged 76. . 0 _go o On the 26th in in her 67th year, Elizabeth, fil r ho. Exeter, of Chester -place, Kennington. f 1 04" On the 20th inst., at Hackney, I%lr. Pitt Mall, late o market, aged 76. Ei *rel bert isCiasha6relyes Stanlieel,,i3sri. On the 224 inst., at Boulogne-sur-Mer, aged 19, . 81 second son of Henry Goldsmid, of the same place. wri a,• vr l On the 15th inst., at Como, Italy, in her 25th year, of John F. Clark, M.D., Physician to the Forces. - • London : Printeri and Publishedy-1111J 11D0i at Tke Sing Office, No. 11.2, Strals°' Anxi i THE '9NGb c tve t , o+ . o'o, o ,i t ;IN Slit 41% c c S not yet known here. Or B II? THS. _A gig' On the 27th inst., in Star-street, Edgeware-re.—' ut et. , Shoberl, of a daughter. Lately, at Beckett, the Viscounte ss Barringg"pici ton, 44.51114 clan°l. , On the 26th inst., at Brettenham Park, t h e lady'" fiettr] son, of a daughter. the 11°. On the 25th inst., at Purley Hall, the lady of Wilder, of a son ftoo tt-streett On the 26th in * st , the wife of Mr. John Mitchell, ea Lion' of a daughter, still- • born On the 26th inst , Mrs Richard Edward Ardeno ° f 11 .1 , 1 0° square, of a daughte • r. • lady of I li° On the 26th inst ,in Tavistock-square, the 14104 Platt, of a son. • A roght On the the 22d inst., at Blackwater Town, Cog" 11. Ale the lady of Arthur Donnelly Es of a daughter. K• C l' On file 27th inst., at Cam ' berqw•ell, the lady of . Esq., of a son. 9l_,4'' __. „ l:ao