The Sun. — London, England, 1856-07-25 00:00:00

Sporting Intelligence. TATTERSALL'S, THURSDAY. Ipswich Races, and the sale at Duddlng•hill. Farm,, drew off a large majority of the members. The room was, therefore, thinly attended, and the following trans actions came under our notice GoODWOOD STASES. sto 1 agst Zeta (offered) 10 to 1 agst Goldhill (wanted) 10 to 1 agst Bandalore (taken and offered) 15 to 1 agst Jolly Marine (taken) 12 to 1 agst Lady Tatton (taken 14 to 1) '2O to 1 aget Vandal (takes) GOODWOOD CUP. 3to 1 agst Fisherman (7 to 2 taken freely) 7 to' 1 agat Yellow Jack (offered) 10 to 1 aget Muscovite (taken freely) 12 to 1 agst Vandermnlin (1,000 to 100 t. once) STEWARDS' CUP—(GooDWooD). 7to 1 agst Flacrow (taken and offered) 20 to 1 agat Queen Mab mare (taken to 501.) IPSWICH RACES—THMISDAY. The Two-yr-old Sweepstakes of 5 sove each, with 25 added ; colts, Bst 71b ; fillies, Bst 41b. The winner to be sold for 100 Bove ; allowances, if entered, to be sold for less, k.c. Winners extra. Half a mile. 5 subs. Mr. Armstrong's Cutty Quean, by Malcolm, 301.), 78t 41b... Mr. T. Stevenson's filly, by lago, out of Marnmifer, (301.), Est 111 b (Fordham) 2 Betting-5 to 4on Cutty Quean, who won easily by three quarters of a length. The winner was bought in for 51 guineas. The Suffolk Handicap of 10 s ous each, ft, with 50 added. Certain winners extra. The second to save his stake. Two miles. 14 subg. Mr. Bentley's Tug o'War , 3 yrs, 7st Slb (in. 61b. ex.) (Fordham) 1 Mr. Gnlliver's Redemption, 4 yrs, Set 31b (Prior) 2 Rating—The betting opened at 6t04 on Tug o'War, and closed at 7 to 4 on Redemption, A good race in ; won cleverl y by a length. Handicap of 3 sous each, with 20 aided. Half a mile. Mr. Steven's The Unexpected, by Pompey, 3 yrs, 7st 51b(Prior) 1 Mr. Edeney's Rudston, 5 yrs, Set 21b (Fordham) 2 Mr. W. Robinson's Golden Plover, 6 yrs, Bit 71b (Quinton) 3 The following also ran :--Persia, and Slanderer. Betting-6 to 4 agst Slanderer, sto 2 agst pected, 3 to 1 agst. Persia, 4 to 1 agst Golden Plover. Won easily by a length ; half a length between the second and third ; bad fourth. The favourite took no prominent part in the race. The Borough Members' Handicap Plate of 50 sots. Winners extra. One mile. Mr. Bentley's Tug o' War, 3 yrs, 7st (in. slb extra) (Fordham) 1 Mr. Land's Vestige, 5 yrs, Est Blb (J. Land) 2 Mr. Hobson's Tester, 3 yrs, 6st 31b (Musgrove) 3 Lieut. Partridge's Aldershot, 4 yrs, Est 61b ...(Prior) 4 Betting— 5 to 4 agst Tug o' War, 7 to 2 agst Vestige. Won by two lengths ; four lengths between the second and third. Mr. Merry's accession to the office of Clerk of the Course is likely to be attended with good results. Under his management, the character of the meeting has been decidedly improved. The company was very numerou- , , and amongst other distinguished visitors, it comprised his Grace the Duke of Wellington, the Earl of Strad broke. Sir Fitzroy Kelly, M.P., Sir E. S. Gooch, M.P., the Hon. B. Bourke , C ol. Berkele y , A. Arcadeckne, Esq., the High Sheriff of the county ; the High Sheriff of Chesbir., Captain Scheiber, Captain Douglas Lane, Captain Towuley, &c. BRIGHTON IV Acceptances fur the Brigh declared Tuesday, Jul: Age et lb Winkfield Speed the Plough 6 8 8 Pole Star Imogene 4 7 7' Quince The Earl Heir of Linne Vandal Romeo Ilumunffin 4 6 12 Sly Fellow Stanhope Ethel bald Newington g by Surplice— Clem . ;S, AUG. 6 AND 7. .on Stakes. Forfeits to be r 29. The Old Course. Age st lb Pantomime Morris Dancer Lthelliqt 3 6 3 Omer Pasha NT id hope Surgeon• General 5 6 2 Merlin Buckingham 3 5 12 g, by Faugh-a•B il lagh—Emuloui 3 5 11 c. by Red Hai t— _ _ _ Evasion Grey Pyrrhus Termagant 3 5 5 .4 6 7 SALE AT THE DUDDING-HILL FARM—The entire stud of horses, brood mares, hunters, hacks, harness horses, carriages, &c., the property of Messrs. Hall, were yes terday sold by auction on the premises, at Willesden. The sale attracted a large concours.l of horse-dealers and others, and on the whole good prices N ere realised. Twenty-one half.brel yearlings brought 3121. 55., and five thorough-bred yearlings 1611 14s. Thirteen half bred two-y,ar-olds were disposed of fur 3951. 6s. ; and two thorough bred two-year-olds were knocked down for 951. lls. Twelve half-bred barren mares realised 2761. 35., and for twenty-four half-bred mares and foals 1,0501. Bs. were obtained. Ten thorough-bred mares were sold for 5901. 12s. 6d. The stud horses brought 9661. 94.; 2001. being given for Harkaway ; 3671. 103. for The Libel ; 1411. 15s. for Pitsford ; 13s. for Chabron ; 1101. ss. for Cleveland Sh , rtlegs ; 881. for The Wonder (a trotter) ; and 15/. for The Lion, a Yorkshire cart horse. Tile 13 hunters, harness horses, &c., were disposed of for 8971. 15s. Inclusive of horses, clrriages, harness, &c., 5,681/. 2s. were realised by the sale. The Messrs. Tattersall were the auctioneers. HORSES STRUCK OUT OF THEIR GOODWOOD ENGAGEMENTS. July 18, at 4 p.m., MiAaap, out of all the engagements in which she is entered by Mr. Stanley. „ 21, at 12.20 a.m., lareca and Dulcamara, out of the Nursery Stakes. „ 21, at 12.20 a.m., Merlin, out of the Stewards' ard Chesterfield Cups. „ 21, at 4.40 p.m., Fulbeck, out of the Chesterfield Cup. „ 21, at 4.30 p.m., Lord Alfred, out of the Stewards' and Chesterfield Cups. „ 22, at 9 a.m., Lord Derby's horses, except Paletot, Fazzoletto, and Crown Pigeon, in Lord Derby's name. GooDWOOD STAKES AND CUP.—Youatt Wm. Gray's advice on the whole meeting will be issued this day and tc-ulorrow. It is a wel known fact that I named 15 winners at this meeting last year. Perhaps there no meeting in the year that I bestow so much study on as " Princ-ly Goodwood." Last year Quince and Heroine (first and second) were my selection for the Stakes, and Barocino for the Cup. lam equally certain, of success again, although in opposition to the betting. Terms : Goodwood, ss. ; including the Ebor, 7e. 6d. ; to the Yurk, 10i. Address 15, Charing-cross. CRICKET. GfIAND FETE AT ENVILLE HALL. The last fete for the sea.on at En ville Hall, the princely residence of the Earl of Stamford and Warrington, com menced yesterday, and will be continued to-day and to morrow. liis lordship deserves the utmost credit for the grand scale on which these fetes, desigaed principally for the amusement of the residents in the locality, have hitherto been got up. Attractive as they were on for mer occasions, the preparations for the present fete sur pass anything that has yet been witnessed. Darby has bean employed in the grounds for the last three weeks preparing the illuminations and fire works, which extend seven miles. A beautiful bridge has been erected ' over the lake, to give additional effect to the pyrotechnic display. The band, sent expressly from London by Mr. Mitchell, and under the direction of Herr Theodore Hermann, has been considerably strengthened. Mr. Nimmo is at his post as master of the ceremonies, and under his able management everything must go off satisfactorily. Lord Ward, with 900 of the Worcestershire Yeomanry Ca valry, is expected to-day, to witness the fete and fire works. The following is the result of the first day's play at cricket between the United Eleven of All England and the Earl of Stamford's Twenty-two : THE ELEVEN. First Innings. Martingell c Earle, b Drake 8 Grundy c Ridding, b Drake Dean st Ridding, b Drake Lockyer Caffyn Lillywhite . . .... 13 .9 ,, Wright ... Wisden Adams B e ll Sherman b 5, 1 b 1, w 3 9 c Tinley, b Brampton 4 c W.Fiennes, b Brampton 3 4 The names of the noblemen and gentlemen composing "The Twenty-two" are — Lord Stamford Lord Strathmore Hon. R. Grimston E. Treder o ft, Esq. Col. Mundy A, Payne, Esq. R. B. Earle, Esq. Hon. G. W, Hiller W. Ridding, Esq. E. T. Drak e , Esq - . Hon. W. Fi ennes We shall report the mate Hon. C. Fiennes W. Walker, Esq. B. Richard•, Esq. T. Addenbrooke, Esq. G. Homfray, Esq. Tinley Brampton Hall Armitatead, Egg, Lawson Hancox till the finteh. AQUATICS. GREAT EIGHT-OARED CUTTER RACE. One of the finest races on record took place yesterday between the gentlemen o f the Leander Club and tae Westminster Scholars. It was from fir s t t o l ast a most beautiful and finish ed specimen of rowing on both sides diversified with alt ernate leads, and ultim a t ely won by , less than half a length. The race was from Westminster to Putney, and th e following were the crews The Leander.—Mr. Davis, stroke ; Mr. Pyor, Mr. Smith, Mr. Layton, Mr. Bovill, Mr. Willoughby, Mr. Wnod, Mr. Co!quhoun, bow; Parish, coxswain. The Westminster.—Mr. Freeman, stroke ; Mr Berens, Mr. Green, Mr. Catt, Mr, Brooms, Mr. Ing ham, Mr. Williams, Mr. Waters, bow ; E. Morland, coxswain. The start took place shortly before 4 o'clock, the Leander having the Middlesex statiqn. They both went off at a very fine pace, and extremely even, in which position they continued, oar and oar, with alternate trifles of lead to Vauxhall-bridge, which both passed under at the same moment. Immediately after this the Westminsters began to draw a slight lead to Nine Elms, and so close and magnificent was the contest, that at the new bridge, crossing opposite where the far-famed Red House once stood, the nose of the Leander boat overlapped the Westminsters' stern about three yards. Both crews still rowed beautifully, and with great regularity, and on approaching Chelsea College the Leander began gradually, stroke by stroke, and almost inch by inch, to advance the head of their boat to the stem of the Westminster, and at Cadogan pier they were nearly as level as at the moment of start ing, and continued so through Battersea-bridge ; but shortly afterwards the Westminsters were unfortunately put out of their course by "a billey-boy," in going round which they lost some way, considered to be about a couple of lengths, and then the Leander went ahead ; but their opponents again began to overhaul them, and off the distillery at Wandsworth were gradually overlapping them. The spirit and beauty of the race was never abated, and the Leander went first through Putney bridge, with the Westminsters' nose up to their number four oar. Both crews afterwards sat down together t' a beauti ful dinner at Mrs. Heath's, the Star and Garter Tavern. Naval and Military Intelligence. Detachments of the Ist Royal Regiment and the 17th left Portsmouth yesterday evening for Aldershot. The 90th landed from her Majesty's ship Queen yesterday morning and proceeded to Aldershot, whither the head quarters of the 42d Highlanders and aye companies of the 19th Regiment proceeded in the afternoon. Alder shot camp being now full, the 97th Regiment has to be provided for at Portsmouth. The 34th Regiment moved from Aldershot to Glasgow ; the 93d from the same camp to Dover ; the 6th Dragoons ditto to Shorncliffe, and IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. the 18th to Dublin. Her Majesty's ship Cressy, 81, Captain C. L. War ren, arrived at Spithead yesterday from the Baltic. Her Majesty's ship Pembroke, 60, Captain Seymour, arrived at Spithead yesterday afternoon from the West lent practices in the management of a society for the relief of the industrious poor, and having declined to attend the service of the house, though required to do so, he was declared guilty of contempt of the house, and was expelled, That case ran on all fours with this case of James Sadleir. He is charged with conspiracy ; HOUSE OF LORDS—(YESTERDAY.) HOSPITALS (DUBLIN) BILL. This bill passed through committee. BURIAL GROUNDS (IRELAND) BILL. Tnis bill passed through committee. LUNATIC ASYLUMS SUPERANNUATION (IRELAND) BILL. This bill passed through committee. JOINT STOCKS BANK BILL. This bill passed through committee. The following bills were read a third time and passed: —lncome and Land Taxes, Stamp Duties, Racehorse Duty, Coast Guard Service, Corrupt Practices Preven tion, General Board of Health Continuance, Militia Pay, Cursitor Baron of the Exchequer, Lunatic Asylums Act Amendment, Deeds (Scotland), Judicial Procedure, &c. (Scotland) Bills. The Marriage, &c., Registration Acts Amended Bill was also read a third time, some amendments being in troduced relative to the mode of entering the marriage. The Commons' amendments to the Mercantile Law Amendment Bill were agreed to. PAROCHIAL SCHOOLS (SCOTLAND) BILL. On the order for considering the Commons' amend ments to this bill, The Duke of ARGYLL said, knowing the majority which the noble duke opposite had on this bill, he should not trouble their lordships to divide. He regretted that this bill, which was a compromise between the two par ties in Scotland, was not agreed to by the noble duke. He conceived that they must fall back in Scotland upon what was called the denominational system. In Eng land there could be no doubt that that system, under the aids granted by the Committee of Privy Council, had, on the whole, operated in favour of the Estab lished Church. In Scotland he did not believe that it would operate in the same manner. There was a feeling of jealousy and dislike on the part of the Free Church against tne great landowners of Scotland, which was aroused in 1842, and which he was sorry to say had not yet diminished. They had in Scotland a great rival body conducting most successfully a system of education. The Duke of BUCCLEUCH urged that the compro mise was one which went to get rid of the great principle on which the Scotch parochial schools were founded, and he contended that there ought to be a religious test for the schoolmasters. This was the first step of an attack against the Church itself; for what was good reason for abolishing tests in the schools would be a good reason for abolishing them in the Church. He also urged that the school system of Scotland was essentially a national one, f ,r the children of all denominations were freely ad mitted into the schools without reference to their profes sion of faith, and that with the consent of their parents. He regretted that it was impossible to do otherwise than move that the first amendment of the Commons be agreed to, but that the second be disagreed to. After some remarks from Lord PANMIIRE and the Earl of HADDINGTON, The first amendment was agreedto, and the second was negatived. fi ri Their lordships then adjourned. . _ be is required to attend the house: and he does not ap pear. On the 20th of June the Master of the Rolls gave him to understand what was hanging over his head ; the grand jury of Tipperary found a - trtie bill against him ; the Government issued a warrant for his apprehension; he could not be found ; and what is the inevitable con- sequence? Why, that he tied the country to evade jus• tice. The only other case which 1 will cite, though there are many of them, is that of Mr. Benjamin Walsh, who was tried and convicted of fraud in 1812 ; and in Indies, Her Majesty's ship Tribune, 31, Captain 11. Edgell, was inspected yesterday morning at Portsmouth by Vice-Admiral Sir George Seymour, prior to going on foreign service. The Admiralty yacht Black Eagle, Master Comman. der Petley, is turning her state fittings into the Osborne Her Majesty's ship Fairy embarked their Royal High nesses the Crown Prince and Princesses of Prussia yes terday morning at Osborne, and took them to Ports mouth dockyard, over which establishment they were conducted by Vice-Admiral Sir George Seymour, Rear- Admiral Martin, and Captain the Hon. J. R. Drum mond, C.B. After the inspection of the establishment ' their Royal Highnesses were entertained at luncheon by the Commander-in-Chief at the Admiralty-house. Mr. Wethered's method of superheating steam, which was applied and tested for experimental purposes on board he Admiralty yacht Black Eagle last winter in Woolwich basin, has been ordered by the Lords of the Admiralty to be continued on board the steam troopship Dee, which vessel has been fitted so as to carry out the intended course of experiments more fully. The success of the system will, it is said, create considerable economy in the consumption of fuel, and will thereby reduce the expense attending the use of steam machinery to from 30 to 40 per cent. The sailing transport Marshal Bennet, Capt. Harris, is discharging in the Victoria Docks a cargo of tenser• viceable 24-pounders and other guns, and 10-inch mor tars, from Balaklava. Yesterday morning a draught of convalescent invalids, to the number of 130 non-commissioned officers and men, belonging to nearly every regiment in the service, left St. Mary's Casemate Barracks, Chatham, and pro jeeded to their homes at the expense of the Govern ment. Nearly the whole of the men had been invalided home from the Crimea. The conclusion of the war and the consequent dis charge of so many transport steamers lately in the ser vice of the Government have caused the Southampton d )cks to be almost choked with steam-ships waiting destinations and employment. During the war the Royal Mail Company's fleet provided six vessels—viz , the Orinoco, Severn, Great Western, Medway, Thames, and Trent ; of these the four former have returned and are discharged from their duties, while the latter will shortly be disengaged. In addition, this company , have lying at Southampton the Atrato, the Tay, Tyne, and Prince, all of which are em ployed in the West Indies, Pacific, and South American mail service. Of the Peninsular and Oriental Company there are in dock the Colombo,' Pera, Manilla, Alham bra, Aden, Rajah, Candia, Sultan, and Ava, screw, aid the Ripon, and Tagus, paddles, the principal of which have been actively engaged throughout the war in the conveyance of the British army to the East. The General Screw Company also exhibit a fine fleet of stea mers, comprising the Indiana, Hyda.spes, Golden Fleece, Jason, Queen of the South, Harbinger, Earl of Auck land, and Sir Robert Peel, most of which have mate rielly contributed to the requirements of the transport service. Besides these steamers there are several be longing to the South-Western Company which ply be tween Havre and Southampton and to the Channel Islands. This fleet, which is the largest ever congre gated in Southampton Ducke, shoes a total of nearly 54,000 tons burden and 12,000-horse power. The future destiny of the vessels is now under consideration. The Royal Mail Company intend to sell several of their older ships, which in the meantime are to be moored in the Southampton Water, while the Peninsular Company will draught off a portion of their suitable screws to as sist in performing the mail service to India. Had the Government decided upon adjudicating to this company the conveyance of the made to Australia, they could immediately have placed efficient vessels upon the route. The General Screw Company's vessels for the present are to remai❑ at Southampton, and their future use will, no donbt, depend upon the arrangements which may be made with the French Clipper Company. The Brilliant, 20 guns, sailing frigate, Capt. James A. Paynter, at Sheerness, is ordered to proceed to Halifax, for duty on the North American and West India sta tions. APPOINTMENTS —Lieut. Wm. Howorth, to the Prin cess Royal ; Lieut. L. Geneste, to the Brunswick; Lieut. R. W. Browne, to the Colossus ; Lieut. St. George C. D'Arcy Irvine, to the Brunswick ; F. Ramebottom, E. A. F. Baxter, W. C. J. Blount, and F. Hartshorne, naval cadets, to the Princess Royal ; W. B. McHardy, naval cadet, to the Colossus ; E. Day, naval cadet, to the James Watt ; Edward Youel, master, to the St. Jean d'Acre ; Andrew W. Miller, master's assistant, to he Amethyst. HOUSE OF COMMONS.--( _ "Ar ESTERDAY.) FRANCE AND SPAIN. Mr. MURROUGH asked whether the Governmen , was prepared to adopt any, and what, means, for the prevention of the armed interference of France in the internal affairs of Spain? Viscount PALM ERSTO.N—I apprehend that there is nothing at present in regard to the affairs of Spain that could in any way lead to any interference on the part of the French Emperor in those affairs. With re gard to the general question, I may state that the Em peror of the French is a man of great justice, and will, no doubt, feel in any case that any foreign interference in the affairs of the Spanish nation would be unjust. He is also a man of great sagacity ; and the lessons of the past show that those of France who have been led to interference in the affairs of Spain have always, sooner or later, found that their interference was more or less destructive to themselves. (Hear, hear.) There can be no reason for apprehending that any intention exists on the part of the French Government to inter fere in the affairs of Spain. (Hear, hear.) THE MISSION TO BELGIUM. Mr. W. WILLIAMS said he had seen a statement of the Earl of Westmoreland being sent on a mission to Bel gium, to congratulate the King of the Belgians, he sup posed. He wished to ask at whose expense that mission had been undertaken ! Lord PALMERSTON—I am afraid my hon. friend will have to contribute his share to it. (Laughter.) MR. JAME 3 SADLEIR. On the motion for proceeding to the orders of the day, Mr. ROEBUCK rose and said—l believe, according to the rules of this house, that I have precedence in this motion I am about to make for the expulsion of a member of this house. I am about to ask the house to exercise a power inherent in the house, of the greatest possible im portance both to its honour and to its efficiency and power in the country. I am not going to ask the house to exer cise this power on any light ground, or upon an occasion on which any one might turn round upon me and say that I am about to establish a precedent which is dan gerous to this house. I am about to ask it to pass judg ment, not by way of punishment to the member whom I suppose to be guilty, but to free itself from the com panionship of a man who has disgraced himself In the ,yes of his country. I do not ask the house upon this oc casion to consider itself a court of judicature, for that it cannot be. It cannot administer an oath ; and all I ask of it is to satisfy its own conscience that what I say is correct. And if they will take the statement as statements of a member of this house are always taken, as conclusive as to the facts of which he is himself cognisant, I think upon this occasion I shall ask them successfully to accede to the motion with which I shall conclude. The motion I have to make is— " That Mr. James Sadleir, the member for Tipperary, he expelled this house." The grounds on which I make this motion are as follows : I do not say that the member for Tipperary is guilty of the charges brought against him. With that I have nothing to do. But alt I have to say is, that charges have been brought against him derogatory to his honour, destructive of his power and capacity as a member of this house, sum as, if fixed upon him, and not rebutted by him, are a disgrace to this house so long as he remains a member thereof. I say these charges have been brought asainst him ; into their truth I will not inquire. But what I do charge him with is that he, knowing that these charges were brought against him, fled from jus tics, evaded the accusation, and did not attempt the defence. The charge then that I make is, not that be is guilty of the crime, but that having fled from it, he has confessed himself guilty ; and all that I have to make out to this house is that he has fled from the accusation, and when I make out that the accusation is made and that he has flsd, I lay sufficient ground for this house to expel him. The first part of the accusation is that he has been charged with crime. I hold in my band some papers which have just been laid on the table of this house. The first is a bill of indictment found at the Clonmel assizes by the grand jury of that county, or rather a certified abstract of the bill of indictment ; and it says that "upon search made amongst the records of the county, we find that at a general assize and gaol delivery held in Clon mel in and for the South Riding of the county Tipperary, o n the 18th day of July, in the 20th year of her Ma jesty's reign, a true bill of indictment has been found against James Sadleir, charging, in the first count"— sild so it goes en with eight counts, charging him with fraud. That is upon the 18th of July. Upon the 19th of Juno the Master of the Rolls in Ireland, irs delivering a judgment, used these words—" It is now necessary to go to the succeeding -tage of this transaction, and which I believe is unparalleled in the annals of fraud." So that he was quite aware, so early as the 19th of June, that he was charged with fraud. On last Friday I, in this house, gave notice that I should make a motion calling on the hon. member—l ought not to call him the hon. member —the member for Tipperary ; I gave notice that I would make a motion on Monday last that the member for Tipperary should attend in his place on this day, in order that he might appear in this house when I made a motion for the expulsion of that member. So that he had notice, first by a judgment delivered by the Master of the Rolls as far back as the 19th of June, that he was charged with fraud. On the 18th July an indictment is found against him by the grand jury of Clonnnel. Some time before that warrants were issued by the Govern. ment for his apprehension ; and we have sent down from this house a messenger who bas gone to Publin and to Tipperary in order to find him. He is not there. We have been unable to find him. Therefore I conclude that he has fled from justice ; and having fled from justice, with that charge over his head, I say that he is unworthy to sit as a member of this house. It may be said that I am about to make a dangerous precedent in this case. A dangerous precedent ! It may be said to me—" Suppose that you had gone to America, and that some member had got up in his place and said, I shall, on Thursday Next, make a motion that Mr. Roebuck do appear in his place, when I shall make a motion for his expulsion from the house." I answer that argument in this way. If there had been a charge made against me by the Master of the Rolls —if there had been an indictment found against me—if there had been a warrant issued against ine—it the house had sent its messenger to find me, and I was not in my place— if I did not appear personally — what objection could there be to such a motion as this ? But it may be said, " Why ha sten this ! Where is the danger if we wait till next session !" Wait till next ses sion ! Have we not waited long enough already ? It is as if a man should lie down by a dead body, and at tempt to repose himself in the noisomeness thereof. I say that this house, allowing a 'member who is thus charged to abscond from justice, and allowing him the name of a member of this house, does itself dishonour; and, in order to avoid that dishonour, I woul d cut off th i s peccant member. It is not as if, by the expulsion of this member, we rendered him incapable of being re-elected. The case of John Wilkes has established that an ex pulsion from this house does not render a man incapable of being re-elected. Supposing his expulsion to be passed to night, he can go down, if be pleases, into Tip• perary to-m, rrow and propose himself for re-election. But will he do so ! I appeal to this house—l appeal to every gentleman here, if he is not sure in his heart that the man has evaded justice, and that we are now about to do justice upon him, and justice to ourselves, by ex pelling him ? I do not fear this precedent. It may be said that there is no conviction. There is none ; but by my proposition I do not require a conviction. I say that this fleeing from justice is of itself sufficientfor this house to satisfy its conscience that the m an is guilty. Nobody pretended to say that he would not have a fair trial. Therefore I say that he is guilty, and has con fessed hims e lf gu ilty by his flight. I will now cite a few precedents fur the proceeding I propose. The first case is one which took plaoe in 1752, in the reign of George 11. A person named George Robin son having been charged in Parliament with fraudu- THE DEATH OF ADMIRAL GLYNlC—Admiral Henry Richard Glynn died on Sunday last at his residence at Bideford, Devon, at the age of 87 years. The admiral was the son of Sergeant Glynn, formerly M.P. for Mid dlesex. He entered the navy as fist class volunteer in 1780 on board the Bellona, 74, Capt. Richard Ous whom he accompanied to the West Indies. From 1783 until he obtained his first commission in 1790 he served afl uit on the different stations at Portsmouth, Jamaica, and Halifax. He joined in Feb., 1794, the Royal George, 100, bearing the flag of Admiral Lord Bridport, under whom he took part in the "glorious" let of June, and also in the action of the 23d of June, 1795. In October the following year he was appointed to the Scourge, 16, and white in the command captured Le Furet, French privateer of 10 guns, and 50 men. In April, 1798, he was made a post captain, and subse quently had the command of several ships, the last the Vanguard, 74, which he commanded on service in the Baltic from Jan., 1809, until Dec., 1811. His commis sions were dated as follow :—Lieutenant, Oct. 28, 1790 ; commander, June 29, 1795 ; captain, April 10, 1797 ; rear-admiral, July 19, 1821 ; vice -admiral, Jan. 10, 1837 ; and admiral, Nov. 9, 1846. The deceased had received the silver war medal and two clasps, and also the medal awarded to the officers who served i❑ Lord Howe's fleet from the let June. The late admiral served the office of Mayor of Plymouth i❑ 1838. Lieut. H. R. Glynn, R.N,, is son of the deceased admiral. TII iUN I.ON DON, FRIDAY EVENING, JULY 2r, :655 that case, although the conviction had been quashed on technical grounds, Mr. Walsh was expelled the house. Sir F. Burdett, who at that time was at the head of the liberal party, voted for the expulsion. Mr. Wynne, a high authority on such subject-, said the house " ought to take an important trust out of the hands of a person who was unworthy to hold it." Mr. Perceval took the same view. So that in this case, after an acquittal had taken place, the member was expelled because the house was convinced that, though he was not legally, he was mo rally guilty of the fraud. We are not here as a court of justice, but we are bound to protect the dignity and honour of the house. These kiting my opinions, and feel ing that the honour and dignity of the house are compro• mired as long as James Sadleir remains a member of it, I beg leave to move that he be expelled. Mr. NAPIER seconded the motion, and said that the question involving important considerations, the house ought to see its way clearly before they came to any decision. This was a case in which the honour and dignity of the house and the rights of the constituency of Tipperary were concerned. A notion prevailed that the house had no materials, technically speaking, to act upon. But it was confounding the jurisdiction o a court of law with the jurisdiction of the House o Commons to suppose that the same kind of evidence was required in both. The House of Commons could not examine [upon oath, they did not require the technicalities which were indispensable in a court of law ; it was enough for the House of Commons to have before it what would satisfy its conscience, especially with regard to matterisaffectiog the members of the house. It was enough for the house to know that it had facts before it on which it could fairly and reasonably act. The ease was one in which they must be guided by pre cedent. In 1807 a committee of the House of Commons bad examined all the precedents of expulsion, they col lected all the cases and arranged them in chronological order. Some of these cases established the fact that it was enough for the house to be convinced of the moral turpitude of the offender, even though he had not been legally convicted of crime; and there were one or two re markable cases where the house expelled an unworthy member, and afterwards addressed the Crown that the parties might be prosecuted by the Attorney-General. The first case of expulsion referred to by the committee oc curred in 1558, and there were other cases in 1620 and 1710. In the case of Atkinson, who had been indicted for perjury, the Attorney-General moved that he be expel led the house after he absconded from justice. Sir S. Romilly said he would vote for the expulsion of Lord Cochrane on the facts of the case, although he believed he had been improperly convicted. In the case of Walsh, the house expelled that person after he had been con victed of felony, though the judges subsequently decided that it was not a felony of which he had been found guilty. He admitted that the minority against the expul sion in that case, though only 18 in number, was respect able authority, including, as it did, the names of Sir R. ltotnilly, Lord Brougham, and the father of the present Speaker. He admitted they ought not, on the grounds of mere suspicion, to be carried away and vote the ex pulsion of a member. But this was a peculiar and special case. The facts were notorious. The Master of the Rolls declared that a gigantic fraud bad been committed ; the Attorney-General was of opinion that the party was guilty of conspiracy ; he embodied that opinion in an indictment ; the grand jury found a true bill ; a warrant had been issued for the apprehension of the party ; he had not answered the summons of the house ; the constituency of Tipperary were substantially without a member ; and, it, under these circumstances, they shrunk from the duty imposed on diem, they would be holding out a miserable example of their own timidity, and avowing that a roan might be charged with a crime of the greatest turpitude, might fly from justice, and not respond to the order of the house, and yet be entitled to be called the " honourable" mem ber for Tipperary. The SPEAKER asked whether the hon. and learned member for Sheffield wished to have the documents read by the clerk at the table ? Mr. ROEBUCK said he did not think it would be necessary. Mr. WORTLEY appealed to the house whether it would not be better in a case of so much importance, whether it would not be the wiser coerse, to take more time for the consideration of these documents and the precedents which had been referred to ? (Hear, hear.) Ele believed he was norrect iu saying that none of the precedents quoted were identical with the present case. (Hear, hear.) Here was the case of a member charged, no doubt, with the greatest possible fraud— fraud for which there was no mitigation or excuse. That charge of fraud now resolved itself into one of conspiracy, and a prosecution was hanging over the head of the party on that charge. It appeared that he left the coun try before the warrant was out against him, and for aught they could tell he might yet appear. He knew cases where persons had kept out of the way that they might not spend three or four months in prison before trial, and who surrendered on the day of trial. The house would be put in a curious and painful position if, after a resolution of expulsion, the party came back for trial, and substantiated his innocence. He therefore thought the present proceeding was premature, and, at all events, that a decision would be premature, unless they had the documents before them. He therefore begged leave to move that the documents referring to the case be printed, and that the debate be adjourned. Mr. J. D. FITZGERALD wished, before proceeding further with the debate, to show the house the exact evidence which they had before them. He protested against the principle that the house should act on state ments merely because they were said to he notorious. They had evidence of the fact that on the 4th of the pre sent month of July, informations had been sworn against .James Sadleir, not on a charge of felony, but on a charge of misdemeanour, which charged him with conspiring with his brother, John Sadleir, to cheat the public b 7 a false representation as to the rate of the Tipperary Bank, and representing that it was solvent in order to induce others to become shareholders. They had also this evi dence, that on the same 4th of July a warrant had been issued for the apprehension of Jas. Sadleir—that on the 18th of July, being the first day of the assizes, the grand jury found a true bill of indictment, and that upon that bill being found by the grand jury, a bench warrant was issued for his apprehension on Saturday last. That was all they had before them in the shape of evidence. There had been many charges and accusations which might or might not be true ; but of evidence there was nothing be yond what he had stated. He would next point out the course which the legal proceedings would take. Mr. Jas. Sadleir not being amenable to justice, not being arrested under the warrant, and not having appeared to answer the charge against him in the ordinary course of things, proceedings of outlawry would be taken. The law did not consider even a judgment of outlawry tantamount to an admission of crime; but if that step was arrived at the house would have something on which it might act, and if it thought fit expel Mr. Sadleir. He would now allude to another matter :—On Monday last the house made an order that James Sadleir should attend in his place on that day. They had not yet before them what took place in pursuance of that order ; but he (Nit-. Fitz gerald) had seen the messenger of the house, who in formed him that he proceeded to Ireland with all expedi tion, and on Tuesday served the order at Sadleir's residence in the county of Tipperary, and then next served it in Dub lin at a house where he was stated to have resided, and on the solicitors who had acted for him in the proceedings connected with the Tipperary Bank. He (Mr. Fitzge• raid) made this preliminary statement to enable the house to form its judgment. He was not about to say that it was his intention to resist the motion, nor that such was the intention of the Government. Let them see if the motion would be justified by the precedents which had been cited. The first of these precedents was that established by Robinson's case. Now, in that case there had been a select committee to inquire into the charge, and the member had been expelled, not for fraud, but for contempt of the house in not having obeyed en order that he should attend in his place. Then there was the case of Walsh in the year 181?. It appeared that Walsh had been found guilty of fraud by a jury, al though the judges afterwards decided that the fraud was not a felony. The house had however resolved that Walsh should be expelled on the ground that he had been guilty of the fraud, and that was undoubtedly a very proper decision, for it was the duty of the house not to allow any man to continue a member who had been convicted of a fraudulent transaction. In the case of Mr. Hunt a commission was appointed, who ma le a report, in which he was charged with having mis appropriated 83,000/. He had absented himself as in the present case, and on the 4th of April a member of the house brought the subject forward ; but on representa tion from the Speak er that the notice had been too short he withdrew the notion' and it came again before the house on the 23d M a y, 1810. By that time Mr. Hunt bad fled, notwithstanding that the order of the house to appear had been served upon him. In his reply he ad mitted the charges to a certain extent, but denied that the offence was so great as alleged. The question came formally before the house on that occasion, and the member was expelled. That was the only precedent be could find, on which, without any inquiry, either in the house or in a court of law, a resolution to expel a member had been passed, and then it must be re collected that it was upon his own admission of guilt. There were many other cases, but be would , not take up the time of the hOuse by referring to them. He had gone through the records in the Irish Parlia ment for the last century, and in no case had he found that the members charged with misconduct had been ex pelled without previous inquiry. lie hoped, therefore, that the advice given by Mr. Grenville in Wilkes's case would be followed. Tne conduct of Mr. James Sadleir was not impugned before the 4th of July. At all events, that was the earliest period with respect to which the house could take cognisance of his conduct ; and if it were advisable to institute any inquiry, in his opinion it would be better to postpone it until after he bad been called upon to appear to answer a criminal charge—then, if he did not appear, he would be outlawed. In conclu sion, the right bun. and learned gentleman hoped that no attempt would be made to give a political turn to the case, observing that his only object was to advance 440 purity and dignity of that house, which could not eO3 1, secured unless it had a due regard to justice. Mr. S. FITZGERALD agreed that this was . a matter with which the holm could not act with too KauolicAutio but did not think that the learned Attorney-General had stated to the house what the real facts of the case were. Mr. Jame , : Sedleir's connection with the Tipperary Joint Stock Bank had been the subject of inquiry in the highest court in Ireland, and the judge of that court had found that a letter had been written by the late Mr. Sadleir to his brother, pointir.g out by what means one of the most unparalleled frauds could be carried out. They had it before them that that letter had been found in the possession of Mr. James Sadleir, and also that the directions contained in the letter had been fully carried out by him. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL for IRELAND — Oh, no 1 Mr. S. FITZGERALD—At all events they bad the fact that, in obedience to the directions contained in tbat letter, Mr. James Sadleir put his name to a fraudu lent statement in respect to the position of the bank, and also that a fraud of so gigantic a nature had been perpetrated that the whole of the English shareholders, who in consequence of that fraudulent statement had invested money in the bank, were released from their liabilities. Those were the facts which had been laid on the table of the house in the documents which were pro duced ; and he must say he was strongly of opinion that they ought to take some steps to secure the honour and reputation of the house. It must be recollected that it would be impossible that any trial could take place be fore the Lent assizes, and therefore until the month of March next Mr. James Sadleir tvould occupy the honour. able position of a member of Parliament. He wished to know whether any proceedings of outlawry could be taken before that time? Although it was very true that until a trial and conviction had taken place the house could not be put into formal possession of the facts of this case, yet he thought that no reasonable man could doubt—after what had been stated by a most upright judge, who had fully investigated the facts of the case— that a great fraud had been committed by Mr. Sadleir. His hon. friend opposite (Mr. Wortley) had moved as an amendment to the motion made by the hon. and learned gentleman the member for Sheffield that the papers should be printed. The effect of that would be to get rid of the motion altogether. The papers were very short, and hon. members had been placed in full possession of the facts of the case, therefore he thought there was no excuse for not coming to a decision upon the main question. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL was most anxious to echo the advice given by his right hon. and learned friend the Attorney-General for Ireland, that they ought to proceed with the utmost deliberation in this case. He believed that his hon. and learned friend the member for Sheffield was animated with no other desire than to up. hold the dignity and the honour of that house. But it must be remembered that they were now exercising a judicial function; they must take care, therefore, that they did not act with precipitancy. The house must thoroughly understand that if they adopted the motion of his learned friend they would establish a prece dent ; for there certainly had never yet been a case in which the house had expelled an individual member, since law and justice had prevailed, except upon previous conviction or inquiry, where the accused had an oppor tunity of vindicating himself. As far as he (the Attor ney General) understood, Mr. Sadleir was not a party to the proceedings before the Master of the Rolls, neither had be had any opportunity of explaining or refuting the charges which had been brought against him. He (the Attorney General) did not pretend to assert that a conviction was necessary to justify a proceeding of this nature ; but, in his opinion, there ought to be some pre liminary inquiry by the house into the facts of the case. It must be remembered that the judgment of the Master of the Rolls had been appealed from, and even if it bad not, that judgment was not formally before the house. He could not understand why it was necessary that they should act hastily in this matter. It was quite clear that within a fe A , days Parliament would be prorogued. The house therefore could not be offended by the pre sence of Mr. Sadleir, neither could his constituents re ceive any injury, because in the interval between the prorogation and the meeting of Parliament they would have no need of his services. In the meantime Mr. Sadleir would be required to surrender and take Isis trial. Upon that trial he would be either convicted or acquitted. If he did not surrender the proceeding of outlawry would take place, and it had been laid down by the highest Parliamentary authorities that outlawry upon a criminal proceeding would be sufficient to dis qualify any man from sitting in Parliament. By a post ponement, therefore, they would avoid the charge of pre cipitancy, and they would avoid creating a precedent which might hereafter be converted into a political in strument. Taking all the circumstances, therefore, of the case into consideration, he thought that the better course of proceeding would be to postpone this motion until the commencement of the next session. Lord PALMERSTON thought that the circum stances of the present case had been so fully discussed that the motion for printing the papers was unnecessary, there being nothing in them of which the house had not full cognisance already, and if carried the motion would only involve further discussion. They were called upon to protect the honour, parity, and dignity of the House of Commons. No doubt, that was one of their most im portant duties ; but it must not be f)rgotten that one of the greatest elements of purity was a strict adherence to the principles of justice ; and, above all things, that they should avoid ereating a precedent which might hereafter operate injuriously. However clear in the opinion of members the guilt of Mr. Sadleir might be, they ought not to proceed to expel him until either a conviction had taken place or an examination, 'through a committee or otherwise, had been made. (Hear.) Sir H. WILLOUGHBY considered that the notice which bad been given of the present motion was too short. On that single ground, therefore, he hoped the hon. and learned gentleman would not press his motion. Mr. HENLEY agreed with the noble lord opposite that justice should be their first consideration, and even supposing the case of Mr. Sadleir to be worse than they imagined it, yet considering that the notice of this 'no tion was given on Monday, it would not be fair play to proceed upon Thursday to expel a member who might reasonably be supposed to be absent from other muses. He was not the man to condemn a person unheard. Mr. WORTLEY said he had no objection to with draw his amendment if the hon. and leaned gentleman below hiss would withdraw his motion. (After a pause.) The hon. and learned member for Sheffield makes no sign. (A. laugh.) Under those circumstances he could only withdraw his amendment on the understanding that the noble lord would move the previous question. Mr. ROEBUCK—Sir, I suppose there will be no fur ther discussion on this matter. It strikes me from the statement of the right hon. and learnel gentleman the Attorney-General for Ireland that soffie political consi derations are mixed up with this question. (Cries of No, no.) I understood him so, and I think it a most unhappy thing that we cannot touch anything in regard to Ireland unless political feelings are imported into the discussion. I have done the best I could to support the honour and dignity of the house, and if I find the majority against me, of course I cannot help it. You talk about the dan ger of precedent. No man has pointed out what that danger is. What is this case? A man commits a crime dishonourable in itself. He is found by the Master of the Rolls guilty of a fraud of the most atrocious description, and I ask, therefore, if such a man ought not to be ex pelled from the House of Commons ? To talk about dan ger, and to affect a squeamishness of this sort, appears to me to be most inconsistent with the maintenance of the honour and dignity of the house. Sir, we stand dis honoured by the association with a peccint member. I have done what I could to free you from that associa tion, and the blame must therefore rest with those who have prevented me. Lord PALMERSTON said that he was actuated en tirely by the consideration of what was due to the hon our and dignity of the house, which at all events ought to be influenced by the principles of justice. Mr. MALINS said that under all the circumstances of the case he should support the amendment, but only upon the distinct understanding that the motion would be brought for ward at the earliest possible period next session. Mr. NE WDEGATE said he had not the slightest doubt in his own mind of the moral turpitude of Mr. Sadleir, and, therefore, if the question went to a division he should vote with the hon. and learned member for Shef field; but he recommended him not to divide the house, because if he were in a minority it was quite clear that the member for Tipperary would escape altogether. The amendment was then withdrawn, and the previous question having been put, was carried without a division. Mr. ROEBUCK—Sir, may I be allowed to ask whe ther, if in the interval of time between now and the next session of Parliament Mr. Sadleir applies for the Chiltern Hundreds the application would be refused ? Lord PALMERS MN—Most undoubtedly. BISHOPS OF LONDON AND DURHAM RE TIREMENT BILL. The house then went into committee upon this bill. On clause 3, which provided that the sum of 4,500/. a-year be granted to the Bishop of Durham during the term of his natural life, Mr. ROEBUCK moved that the sum be reduced to 3,000/., observing that by law the income of that right rev. prelate was 8,000/. a-year, but that an arrangement had been made by which he paid a certain sum of money to another person to perform the duties of the office, which considerably reduced his income. He therefore thought that one-third of his income was a reasonable pension. The difference in the income of a bishop living in the country and, in town differed, because it was supposed the latter had more duty to perform. That might be a reasonable proposition applied to an acting , bishop, but could have no reference at all to a retiring bishop. Bishops belonged to a class who professed to consider poverty a virtue. He considered that 3,000/. a-year was a sufficient income for this successor of the apostles, and entertaining that opinion he should certainly divide the committee upon the question. Lord PALMERSTON said the bishops had received more than 8,0001. alear. The bill went upon the principle of a retiring allowance proportioned to the amount of the income of the bishops and the sum to be surrendered to the common fund. Giving the successor the 8,000/., and the retiring allowance of 4.500/. to the present bishop, there would be a gain to the common fund. Lord R. CECIL said it seemed to be implied that if the bishop did not get 4,500/., he would retain the whole 16,000/. But he hoped the bishop bad not so elephantine a hide—(hear, hear)—and would not s tick so closely to the revenue f his bishopric wnile unable to perform its duties. (Hear, hear.) he fact was", that 8,000/ a-year was the sum fixed by law, and the bishop bad na tnaged by an ingenious contriv ince to get 160 00 , and now claimed a retiring allowance on that ba sis. ,/ (Hear, hear„) Sir G. GREY defended the bishop, and declared that it was net by any "ingenious contrivance," but by a legal arrangement, which he (Sir G. Grey) achnitted to have been a bad` one. (Hear, hear.) Being then indawfisl possession of the larger income he was entitled to a re tiring allowance proportionate to it. lAiving in his die use he (Sir G. Grey) could say that the bishop devoted ! Tient to the proclamation of the 19th day of January a considerable p otitis, of his income to charity purposes. i 1852: of any correspoedenc e that hes taker pl a ce bee Mr. CARDWELL said it was certainly the intention , tween Meer Ali i‘lorad and t he authorities in India, re of the Legislature that the sum of 8,0001. should be the 1 lative to his intended visit t 0 England : of the deposi limit of the bishop's revenue, and the retiring allowance , twins er other information on. the claims of All Moral, ought to he calculated on that basis. (Hear.) recorded by Captain Pope ore the occasion of his visit to Mr. SPOONER said he had voted 6,0001. for the Khyrpoor, in August, 1843, as stated by Captain Pope Bishop of London, as that was the third part of his re- in his letter to F. Thomason, Esq., secretary to the go venue, He was prepared to vote the allowance of the vernment of India, dated Sole kur, October 24, 1843, and Bishop of Durham on the same principle. It appeared published in page 63 of parlia wentary Papers, No. 73, of that the revenue of the Bishop of Durham was 16,0001.1 session 1852 : of all correspoi science between the magis a-year. The question was not what Parliament had in- I trate of Sukkur and the never arnent of Scrods between tended, but what Parliament had enacted. the years 1843 and 1845, or 1 uring the same period be- Mr. MOWBRAY confirmed this argument, and tea- tween the government of Sci nde and that of India, re ' tified in favour of the bishop as to his munificence, espe- specting the withholding fres a Meer Ali Morad of the cially in the establishment of the " Maltby Fund," and penguunahs of Meerpoor, M ,ahtela, and Meherkee, and giving 2,0001. a-year to the church purposes of his dio- of any correspondence betwet al the same parties relative eerie. to their restitution to him in 11845: of the proclamation Mr. DUNCAN spoke in favour of the bishop, stating of Mr. Commissioner Free' -e, dated the 19th day o that he augmented the incomes of the poorer clergy in January, 1852, confiscating tl fie territories of the Anuses his diocese. Ali Morad : and return of t' le several pengunnahs and The committee divided— districts confiscated by this, proclamation, and of the For the larger sum Against it . l9 each of those districts, in each, of the years since the date Majority Mr. MOWBRAY desired to call the attention of the The house then adjourned.. ecc'esiastical commissioners to the question of the aug- , mentation of smaller incomes. There were many cases in ..hick per eier,4v were receiving additions to their in- Couatry I darkets. come from the Bishop of Durham. Now, neither the sue • ---es ces-or nor the present bishop with their smaller incomes DERBY SMITHFI ELD.—JULY 22. would be able to keep up these paymsnts :and as the There was a better supply cef fat beasts to-day, but the common fund would be benefited by the arra n g ement in demand was flat. Sheep and lambs more plentiful, and progress, be eugge , ted that these poor er cler gy should I some few lots of each left unsoid. . Calves a good supply. have their claims considered by the commissioners, and The number of fat pigs was about the average, and in re have a "post charge" upon the fund. Sir G. GREY said the bishop had ma de these grants . quest. The following were the quotations :—Beef, bid to 7d; to the 'poerer c!e' vs, with the lull knowledge that they mutton, 7d to 7.(1 ; lamb, 72d to 8d ; veal, 6,1 te —4 per could only last during his life ; but if the commissioners lb. ; pigs, lOs6d to lle Od per mules ; rough fat, 5s oito Os had the legal power, no doubt they would consider their per 141 b.; hides, 3.0 to 4d per lb ; calif-skins, 3;d to 51 I cases. , per lb. Mr. GLADSTONE said the bill had been assented to -- in a great degree on the understanding that a certain EDINBURGH GRAIN.--JULY 23. sum should go to the common fund. But now it appeared A fair supply of grain to-day. Sales; dull for all sorts, I that a large portion of this sum was to be deducted for and prices a little easier, with the exception of oats. the benefit of clergymen who had enjoyed the private Wheat, on the top, 5s Od down, and on the average 5d charity of the bishop. If so, the measure had been passed down. Barley, Os 6d down on the top, and 7d down on on false pretences or false representations. the average. Oats on the top is 4d up--on the average. , Sir G. GREY repeated that the c marnissioners must Os 4 d up. Beans on the top is 6(.1 down--on the average, - deal with the case according to the view of their legal 3d down. 1 AVERAGES PER IMPERIAL QUARTER. powers. t Mr. HEADLA.M said he regretted that no ecclesias. Wheat .£4 0 2 5-12ths. e tical commissioner was present to make any definite pro- Do. new r mise as to the claims of those poor clergy who had been Barley Oats referred to. e Beans Mr. RIDLEY said a very small portion of the enor mous mous funds at the disposal of the commissioners was ale. BOSTON—JULY 23. a plied to the augmentation of small dioceses. it Mr. FOSTER supported those equitable claims upon Influenced by the favourable state of the weather and the splendid appearance of the crops,the wheat trade w aled e t the common fund. Sir G. GREY remarked that the report of the corn- exceedingly inactive, and the few sales effected, which a were merely for present use, must be noted fully 2s per qr. missioners, which was about to be produced, entered lower than last week. Oats and beans the turn cheaper e• fully into this subject. Nothing doing in other grain. in Mr. CARDWELL, as one of the commissioners, Prices :—Wheat, red, 65s Od to 78s Od; white, 78s Od to r, hoped that nothing that had p assed in the p resent discus 80s Od extra, 83s Od. Barley, —s Od to —s Od. Oats, us sion would be understood a s committin g them, and that 22 s to 29 5. Beans , 44 s Od to 48; Od. Peas, to —s Od. r- the house would reserve their opinion upon it until they per qr. ire had read the report. ty The clause was agreed to. NEWARK—JULY 23. er On clause 5, We had a good supply of grain of all descriptions. ng Mr. ROEBUCK moved an a mendment, the effect of Wheat a heavy sale at late prices. Other corn as before. Ie which was to make the new bishops subject to future Wheat, white 84s to 88s, red 78s to 81s; barley, malting a arrangements of Parliament. —s to -s, grinding 38s to 425; oats, 12st. 34s to 375, list, ais Lord PALMERSTON sa id his ri g ht hon. friend (Sir 30s to 325; beans, 48s to 50s ; malt 64s to 72s ; peas, —a re- G. Grey) was going to give notice of a similar amend- to —s; tares, —s to —s per qr. se. went upon the third reading, and it would be better to ter reserve any alteration until then. LOCAL SHARE MARKETS, ad The amendment was withdrawn. se. Lord R. CECIL observed upon the words "any ____—..—. ley canons to the contrary notwithstanding" what " canons" LIVERPOOL, JULY 24. sat related to contracts by hi-hops upon resignation 7 STOCK EXCHANGE.—The market exhibits signs of ime ed. Lord PALMERSTON said the meaning was that the provement to-day, and prices are a shade better than. ,re- bill should override any ecclesiastical law. (Laughter ) yesterday. re- Lord R. CECIL did not desire to be informed that the this was the meaning of the clause, but what was the MANCHESTER, JULY 21. uld ecclesiastical law in question. No doubt the noble lord STOOK EXCHANGE.—This market was inactive to-day. qr. was profoundly ignorant of ecclesiastical law—(a laugh) and prises were rather easier at the close. his —but surely one of his law advisers ought to be able to --- or inform the house. BIRMINGHAM, JULY 24. ing Mr. GLADSTONE objected to the words, as merely , STOCK EXCHANGE.—The market has been doing a very iwn unmeaning and unnecessary. firm business to-day. There was a fair demand for all wry The SOLICITOR, GENERAL sa id the meaning was railway shares, and prices were steadily maintained. dis- that the act should take effect, notwithstanding any ca- --- ost. none to the contrary. (Laughter.) LEEDS, JULY 24. pre• Lord R. CECIL said he should move that the words STOCK EXCHANGE. —6lidlands, 84—Manchester, Shot• lent should be struck out as surplusage. field, and Lincoln, 346: in- Lord PALMERSTON hoped this motion would not 'the be pressed. The words were words of form, and he arse would consider this matter on the third reading. He SBA B ORNE MA I LB. the thought the words unnecessary. ••• The amendment was withdrawn, and the clauses (N signifies that the mails are sent from the (lexeral Postrofilo urn- agreed to. $y the night—and Mby the morning-4espatch.) ssed Upon the preamble, ---------ra ary, Sir W. HE ITLICOTE said it was objected to by his 'my omen made. npi From was, wl , ovt: oornaßizg„ in (lateral l'Ogt for due "k not right hon. friend (Nis. Henley), who would m ove an Office, London.* Dispatch.,. En. .1 d. ould amendment on the third reading, if it was not o b j ected __ --ea. -- - ipon to by the Government. A.meries(nyiirit.pac).ci ev e ry Friday .... Liverpool ... Weekly ouse Sir G. GREY assented to this. &merles. (by United 8:3. ; im- Mr. GLADSTONE suggested that notice should be Packet) ...........ts E v ery inesday .. Southampton Week l y . 4. , nerica (by U. State: se of given of ally Rauh impor ant amendment. packet) .• •••• • • • • •'7 •........ Liverpool .. i , ....... ce to The SOLICITOR GENERAL said the import of this A,qgtralia (via Liver they amendment would be to add certain words as to the air- pool) ............w 4th and 19th .... Liverpool ..!T-ICe MO! Ditto (v:a &families) .t.. - after render by the bishops of their sees. Ditto (via Cape of goad .:=.1.(.... nof Mr. ROEBUCK said that the preamble was not a H o p e ) ............N ..... •• •• • • ... UtliCertnan tight true preamble, stating, as it did, facts which had never Africa ( West C0aat.)..r;,. ,1 of th. month . Plymouth .. 6th of me. i had occurred. kiexandria......... , h llillii & 26th or n o . Dover ...... 2d a 19th tiex andria ..........24 I to. & 2titi, of m 0.,. ionthampo , 4it 21 olm )e or Tee preamble was then agreed to, and, eah arn es ... .. .. .. .. ei 17th of the mono iouthampt , r 'l6th On the question that the bill be reported, ielgium ......... ~h ' Daily ......... Dover ..... Jii,,y otice Mr. GLADSTONE said he should oppose any a mend. arazil ..............?yl l 9t i h , of , theth - month.. .. , i ;4l m il t tb hi a ni m p p , l , l: July ul I li & i too ment for striking out the words "duly and canonically." hon. The bill then passed through committee, and was or- e ' c l ` , a u a p e p :e ° ol• A G Yr ee e :Vic7;o " . ....s i Uncertain 'r n .. Various port, unoortafr of Good Hope ..1. , dered for third reading to-morrow (this day.) entro do Verde ......h ' n•h ~ , fr, . ~,,,,t iouthemptki 16th of m 0 ^ ' i. (see India) 10th and 26th.... le & 29th osite METROPOLIS LOCAL MANAGEMENT ACT `1'5: c ey 3 ' , 1L'...............i 4th and 20th .... 4 & stub even AMENDMENT (No. 2) BILL. Channel Isles-- , ..N ~,,,.,,,, , ,,,sce r t.. Southampton ru.Th. , at. month Southern 1 and 16 h and 10th they On the motion for the consideration of the Lords' ' N 1 4 ' r ‘l*l" bn f Pts 4 and '49 China ..•,, . mu- amendments to this bill, eenstantineele --a lOth and 26th.... Doves -. •• : 2 and ' 9 ty to Mr. WILLIAMS pressed for the postponement of this a sse t :m e:eve .... .. sight order, on the ground that an hon• friend of his had a 1 Cont. of EuLopwe..M o b rwico daily ..... Dover ...... twice day uses. petition against the bill, and was not ab le to be present fElilato(s.e.e......)Al & N Thvier• daily .. ... Dover .... Twi" d44./ to lay it before the house. 3ibraltar ..........34 ,4,7,17, 20,27 sfrr . Southimp•O 6 . 7, "'"' with- Sir B. HALL declined to accede to the suggestion. Greece (see India) I i l i r a e m yt b o u w rg n i, ....... .. .......D; i 2 D r a id ii ti: 17th o f moil. l4 : ot :c il a ntro . D i al an )y d 16 sman Mr. BUTLER then moved the postponement of the Buse.) order, on the ground that the Lords' amendments had : lavannah ...::::...7,' !2nd of the moot, koottian; " "7 2(1 of me es no only just come down to the house, and sufficient time 301:land ............M Dai1y........ could had not been afforded to consider them. tiondaras .......... Ai 17ta of the month Southampton 16 t h Dover ...., . Dai l, ' india(viaSouthampt.)M ith Sr. 20th or mon. Plymouth ~ 4 a nd 21 m that Sir B. HALL explained the nature of the Lords' India (via Marseilles) M 10th&26thof mod, Dover lb a 29:m amen dments, which had reference to the appointment of tonics lees (see India) • ... ••• , Dover....' .11 - -! a fur- parochial officers. Tue amendments declared that these Ireland ........M & N rwicessilly: Holyhead ... i the officers should be elected by select vestries under the 1A5bati..............0 2d i,o .. Madeira ............31 itri of to, moon Southampton 6, 16 ro re i the bill. tradeira ............11 231 of month aonsi- Mr. PELLATT complained that the Lords' amend- Waite (see India) if No, ments would destroy the whole vitality of the bill. t a 1 u ta n ..............N 4, 10, 20, and 26 Dover ... - a.,.. 4, 21.15, 2 9 sappy Parishes now in the enjoyment of open vestries would wau r reles us (see incite) •••• •.....N 20;h of the montr i s 29 eland not like the measure, and he should move the omission Made° ............13 Ind of the month Southern t'n ist esion. of the Lords' amendments so far as they went to ex- ts Daily ...., • D0ver...... P r and pings the first clause. Sow Granada ...... A 2d 3c 17thof moo' Southampto. .Itily 16 New Zealand.» ' D rV i se a month weekly pinst Mr. WILLIAMS said that the various parishes Papal mates .." .. .....1; 3 dan- looked with great jealousy upon the infringements of Peninsula .....',..„„e 3 ' -••- • • - t ) u v i e i f a w,;::, t that their rights, as they would be affected by these amend- Peru ..............r it & 27th of mon. couthampt , i Ist & 16th crime ments. From time immemorial the parishioners had 3i 02 3 5rata1..........e es private ship Various por . , of the elected their own officers, and he objected to delegate Tuscany ....„,:,. . ..... .. ..1 ,4 i , F r) ; -17 ,, ?i e y y . . S Saturday., r . d a . y . .. ti o n e e r r ........ week , Y, v veLe D zn ie e m is , ... ,; . L . :o .4: 2d& 17th offnonth 40UthaMp 1 f7 A 16m S ption, the right to select vestries. be ex- Sir W. CLAY thought the Lords' amendments left Australia) . .., . l ele .. .„ ith of mon. .. it dan- much that was valuable in the bill. The y also would welt seetsv :. 7'` -. s s e ethamerei 11 and 16 tars to prevent litigation. After the passing of this bill, a of the Church rate could be made in open vestry, which he re- when any of these dates fall on a Sunday, the mails wil be de• d dis- garded as a great point in its favour. spatched on the foll ow i ng d ay . w ith th e exce pti on of the malt.' - a er. I After a few words from Mr. WILKINSON, !outhrimpton), and the M a lta. both o f which will be despatched t he preceding day. secia- Mr. MU RRO UGH hoped the right hon. baronet whe e who had charge of the bill would have the moral courage to move that the L rds' a mendments be not agreed to. PARISHES OF ST. ANDREW ET THE WARDROBE AND ed en• The first clause . was the most, valuable portion of the ST. ANN, BLACKFRIARS.—The inhabitants of these 1 hon- bill, united parishes presented the Rev. Michael Biggs with ought The motion was withdrawn. a purse of 501. on Monday last, on his resignation of On the Lords' amendments to the first clause being the Sunday afternoon lectureship, which he had held tances read, for nine years. only Mr. BUTLER moved that they be disagreed to. THE ROYAL AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY.—A well exe woul,l The house divided— cute(' and appropriate medal has been struck to com• l next For the Lords' amendments Against it 8 tural Society. It is, we believe, the first medal ever doubt Majority —4s issued upon such an occasion, and is, from the taste adleir, The Evidence on :Foreign Suits Bill, and the Sheepoke., displayed in its execution, well calculated to form a me• ion he Contagious Diseases Prevention Bill, passed through morial of it. The obverse is from a design by Harrison r Shef- committee. . Weir, and is executed by Messrs. Pinckes, medalists to house, COURTS OF COMMON LAW (IRELAND) BILL. the Crystal Palace, and the prominent object is a fine 1r that The Lords' amendments to this bill were agreed to. specimen of one of the many beautiful bulls exhibited at r. NUISANCES' REMOVAL, &C. (SCOTLAND), Chelmsford, Iu the distance are horses and sheep, and evious (No. 2) BILL. the plough is also introduced. The reverse of the medal vision. The Lords'amendments to this bill were also agreed to. represents the County-hall, Chelmsford. We notice the r whe- HAY AND STRAW TRADE BILL. medal, not only because it is creditable as a work of le next The Lords' amendments to this bill were likewise art, but also to give an opportunity to those interested hiltern agreed to, a clause having been proposed by Mr. WIL- in agriculture to preserve a souvenir of this very success. ful exhibition. LIAMS for the prevention of fraud amongst dealers, but withdrawn on the representation of Mr. MASSEY ___ _ ___ ___________ __ ____ . RE. that it would impose very onerous duties on the police, BIRTHS. and be practically inoperative. OF A SON. bill. FORMATION, &c., OF PARISHES BILL. On the motion for considering the Lords' amendments On t he 24th inst., at St . George's - terrace, Kensington, 1,500/. the wife of Howard Jackson, Esq. ng the to this hill, The Marquis of BLANDFORD mov ed that the amend- On the 23d inst., at 2, Merc er ' s pl ace , C ommerc i a l- roa d merits should be agreed to. He confesse d he ver y much east, Mrs. Henry sidle iced to y Dale—twins. t right. regretted that the clause which permitted the application OF A DAUGHTER. , eme „ t ,of voluntary offerings towards the endowment of the On the 22d inst., atWimbledon-park, the Ladynermione money c l erg y had been rejected from the bill. He felt ver y G raham . which strongly on the s ub j ec t o f _ that clause ; nevertheless he On the 24th inst., at Croydon, the lady o f A. C. Camp sought f . elt it . i g ht endanger the passing of the bill if he were bell, Esq. nsion. toinsist upon its re-insertion. He should , therefore , con - M A R'R I B D. On the 22d inst., at Milf or d, in the t en t himself with expressing his complete adhesion to Surrey, the Rev. C. W the principle of the clause , a nd he ho p ed that on a futur e :-t p , reed b e a occasion th e sub j ect would be taken up. Belgrave, rector of North Kil wor th , L e i ces t ers hi re , to Mr. GLADSTO NE was ver y g lad to hear the obse r - On the 22d inst, at Upp e r B roo k-street Chapel, Man , '7 , eti . Annie, daughter of the lat e Vi ce -Ad m i ra l D acres. sp, but of his noble friend. He confes sed he felt they cheater, R. Trimble., Esq., of Liverpool, to Jane, the only insider ons were placed in a very u nfortunate p osition . The clause daughter of Mr. Alderman Heywood, of Manches , ter. ar was had been inserte d in the bill with the unanimous a pp ro. On the 23 d inst ,at St. John's,Clapham, n's Charles Craw as, and val of a select co mmittee, and it had p assed thro ugh the s h a y , Es q. , son oißichard Crawshay, Esq., of Ottershaw ide the h ouse w ithout a division. Isloweves, it went up to the park, Surrey, to Eliza M a ria Jane, daughter of the late B- House of Lords at the end of the session, and it was re. Cubitt, Esq., and niece to Sir William Cubitt, ClaphaM• , ce i ve d jected by a majority of two peers in a hou se o f on ly 40 common, Surrey. mem bers. Although the majority againstlthe clause wa s inciple DIED. larger, he quite agreed with his noble friend, :of the no On the 23d inst., at 30, Lower Belgrave-street, Pimlico, ndered thatlas it was wi thin three d ays of the end of the ses• John Polwarth Bien,inst., it would endanger the passing of the bill if Esq., aged 72. ,0001., On the 23d at T a yles-hill, Ewell, Surrey, Frederic , resent th e y were to insist on its re-ins e rti on . At th e same M illett, Esq., age d 57. d , time, having regard to the unequivocal expression of On the 22.1 inst., at Brighton, Frederick 'Winslow that if o pinion in that house in favour of the principle o f th e Young, Esq., of 37, Mortimer street, Cavendish-square, 6in the e arise, he trusted that at a future time attention would aged 75. n ot 80 be again attracted to the subject. On the 23d inst. , et Bishop's Well , Chiselhurst, Ken t . t stick The amendments were then put and agreed to. Frances, widow of the late Gilbert Buchanan, LL.D., of able to THE SMOKE NUISANCE ABATEMENT (ME- Woodman-sterna, Surrey,_ aged 94. s, that TROPOLIS) ACT (1853) AMENDMENT BILL. On the 23d inst., at James Cross, Eso of Ripon, late of Blackburn, aged 60. =', hi-hop The Lords' amendments in this bill were agreed to. On the 22d inst., at Forest-hill, Sydenham, Philip Law ,oool, . MEER ALI MORAD. ton, Esq., aged 84. b as i s . On the motion of Mr. I. BUTT the following returns On the 19th inst., at Tunbridge- we ll s' J. B. Moen' , were ordered :—" Copies of any despatches addressed to Esq ., of U pp er Christen, Middlesex, aged 60. Id that the Governer-General of India, in reoly to the despeeeh .--------, .....................e5s t b y a of Lord Dalhou,ie, dated the 27th day of February, 1851, -- ---- ------ tied to on the subject of the confiscation of the territories of the LONDON: Printed and Published by MURDO YOUNG 'lawful Ameer Alt Morad :• of all correspondence that Passed of No. 112, Strand, Ft inter, at The Ban Office, ei -. ' 15;4 , o a re- between his Highness Meer Ali Morad and the autho - Strand, in the Pi ()eject of the Savoy, in the mull 0 i I l ia di°• rities of India 911 the subject of that ooduloatioa eubse• ktiddleierki Friday s July 2'6 1,806 _I a . . ._ PARISHES OF ST. ANDREW EY THE WABDRODI AND ST. ANN, BLACKFRIARS.—The inhabitants of these united parishes presented the Rev. Michael Biggs with a purse of 50/. on Monday last, on his resignation of the Sunday afternoon lectureship, which he had held for nine years. THE ROYAL AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY.—A well exe cute(' and appropriate medal has been struck to com• memorate the visit to Chelmsford of the Royal Agricul tural Society. It is, we believe, the first medal ever issued upon such an occasion, and is, from the taste displayed in its execution, well calculated to form a me morial of it. The obverse is from a design by Harrison Weir, and is executed by Messrs. Pinekes, medalists to the Crystal Palace, and the prominent object is a fine specimen of one of the many beautiful bulls exhibited at Chelmsford, ILI the distance are horses and sheep, and the plough is also introduced. The reverse of the medal represents the County-hall, Chelmsford. We notice the medal, not only because it is creditable as a work of art, but also to give an opportunity to those interested in agriculture to preserve a souvenir of this very success. ful exhibition. LONDON: Printed and Published by MURDO YOUNG of No. 112, Strand, Ft inter, at The Sun Office, ' ls: ‘ strand, in the Pi eoinct of the Savoy, in the WWII 0 Friday, July 25,1866. LLOYD'S SHIPPING.—(This Day.) LONDON, July 25.—Wind this day at noon, S.W.; moderate breeze and fine. _ _ . POWi851(17;;, S.W— Arrived—H.M.S. Cressy, from Cronstadt ; H.M.S. Ajax, westward. PLYMOUTH, July 24.—Wind N.W.—Arrived—H.M.S.'s Belleisle and London, from Portsmouth. Sailed—Can• dace, for Africa; Pembroke, CARDIFF, July 24.—Wind. N. —Arrived.—Architect, from Prince Edward's Island. LONDONDERRY, July 23.—Wind S —Arrived.—Maria, from Philadelphia. COWES, July 21.—Wind S.W.—Arrived—North Sea, from Padang, for Rotterdam ; Comet, Porto Rico, and sailed for Bremen. CHRISTIANSAND, Jnly 19.—The Mathilde, from Riga to Gainsborough, has put into Arendal, with stern da maged to six feet below the water lino, having been in contact with a vessel off the Scaw on the night of the 16th July ; she must discharge part of cargo to repair. SWANSEA, July 24.—Wind W.—Sailed—Henry Ware, fur Panama. (PEI; ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH.) SOUTHAMPTON, Friday Morning. Arrived—Hansa, steamer, from Bremen ; Deborah, Newcastle ; Mariam, Sunderland. Sailed—La Poule, for Cherbourg ; Brigand, Swansea. T F E r L i, i l t a G y E , A lo %i a . G AN :AV E :S I LT, (BY SUBMARINE m. Wind S. W. ; tide throe hours' ebb ; cloudy. Arrived, 24th—Corsair, from Guernsey ; Thomas Ar buthnot, Coringa ; Oscar, Biorneborg ; Carl and Emma, New York. Arrived July 25 —Harrnonie, from Wenner; Augusta, Biorneborg ; Frow Gesta, Terra Nova; Irene, Aarhuua; Emma Eden, Mauritius ; Charlotte, Cronatadt. Sailed, July 25.--Albion, steamer, for Boulogne. DELL, Friday, 9.59 a.m. Wind N.W. ; light. Passed, July 24.—C. Topper, and Normal, from Quebec; Clive, Madras ; John S. Harris, flavannah ; Evangelist, Buenos Ayres; Gipsy Queen, schooner, Demerara—all for ""u; Paris and London, Ls., from London for Paris; Hero, from London, for Geelong. Passed Dungeness, July 21.—America , fr om A k y ab, for Bremen. Si'lled*—Essex,JohnWilliam Regulator, Juan Fernan• de z, Coringa, Animeran, Rose Standish, Albion, with nearly all the outward bound. :cam' }~ . _ iir/ . '., ,:. f ' )1 ',4 , K ir!.±.l/4 VU' 1 , ,~ ~. • • ~~~