The Sun. — London, England, 1834-07-14 00:00:00

P T T E ?•n+ IC Jr: ,'• :i~~,i►_i::i...'_` caiLie. of Liberal Let ha.: ttinenplied by the good sense and consistent principle of the King. We havc,the gratification of communicating to the country, that since the following article was composed, his Ma jesty has given full and exclusive discretion to Lord Melbourne to form an Administration. The Noble Viscount visited the King yesterday at Windsor, and returned to town last night. It is understood that he immediately communicated with Lord Althorp. We forbear to give circulation to many prevalent rumours, or to anticipate the selection of public men whom Lord Melbourne may elect to associate in a Reform Ministry. From his reported honourable conduct throughout his communications with his Majesty and several public men, we have no fear of his constructing a weak and ricketty Ministry. The experience of the past will not be thrown away. All that the Reformers require is a progressive but sure approach to good government, and the certainty of that great national object by the Royal choice of Ministers in whom they may confide. There is no truth whatever in the re ports of communications between the Tories and the King, except the transmission of a correspondence by command of his Majesty, which the Tories have made no secret of in their clubs, dealing out at the same time copious abuse of his Majesty. The Tories have never been asked to take office, whatever their desires ; and shrewd physiognomists, in the last two days, have noticed the palpable chagrin depicted in their faces. We have now only to express our hope that Lord Altherp will consent to support Lord Melbourne. The declaration in course of signature among the Members of the House of Commons, representing their confidence in Lord Althorp, has already received a very extensive signature. The majority of the Irish and Movement section of the House—generally in the minorities against his Lordship—have also honourably signed it, recognising in the Ex-Chancellor of the Ex chequer the fitting Minister to lead the Commons, uniting in his political character the general confidence of the House. The document is as follows : " My Loan—Convinced that at the present crisis the peace and prosperity of the empire would be promoted by your Lord ship holding a distinguished place in his Majesty's Councils, we beg to express our deep regret at your retirement. " If his Majesty should be graciously pleased to desire a continuation of your services, we beg to assure you that we shall be prepared to afford to your Lordship our best support in carrying into effect the reforms and improvements so anx iously desired by the country, in accordance with that liberal and enlightened policy which secured to the people the great and salutary measure of Parliamentary Reform. " We believe that we shall fulfil our duty to our consti tuents, and best promote the interests of the realm, by thus evincing our confidence, that your Lordship, and those with whom you may ally yourself, will act upon constitutional and liberal principles in the administration of public affairs. We have, &c. &c. " Lord Viscount Althorp." Particular care was taken in the paper to avoid in tending the semblance of any dictation to the King, and the object of it was simply personal to Lord Althorp, and to prove that his resumption of office would be acceptable to all parties—Tories excepted— at the present crisis. Perhaps there never was a mem ber of the House of Commons, on many personal and political grounds, who united so many sections and interests in his favour. No possible imputation could be entertained against Lord Althorp, in respect to his secession from the Ministry of Lord Grey. An ap peal to the late Premier himself would soon set this in sinuation to rest, and Lord Grey has too high an esti mate of the honour of Lord Althorp to allow it to subsist for one moment. The proceedings in the House of Commons this evening will be looked for ward to with great interest.—Morning Chronicle. Nothing has, we believe, been yet determined about the Ministry. Reports, however, abound, which we should be sorry to undertake to reconcile. It is stated in many quarters that, on the resignation of Earl Grey, his Majesty's anxious wish was to see an administra tion formed out of the elite of all parties, and that to ascertain the practicability of such an attempt was the commission with which Lord Melbourne was intrusted. His Lordship's answer is said to have represented the attempt as hopeless. All idea of a coalition is, there fore, supposed to be relinquished. Our city article speaks of an application to Sir Robert Peel as a ru mour to which some degree of credit was attached in the city. But the mention of Lord Althorp as Pre mier has been revived again, and revived in a more cir cumstantial form than before, as the following requisi tion will demonstrate, This requisition is said to have originated with Mr. Hume, who has taken upon him self the part hitherto performed by Lord Ebrington. Some of our contemporaries will have it that another requisition, to the same effect, has been forwarded by another party ; so that, if these statements be correct, Lord Althorp is in a fair way of returning to power. We may add that Lord Melbourne and Mr. Spring Rice visited the Marquis of Lansdowne on Saturday, at his house in Berkeley-square, and that Lord Mel bourne had an interview with the King yesterday. It would be easy for us to add to the length of this article by noticing other reports which have been circulated with equal confidence, if not plausibility, but having al ready said enough for the state of our information, we are satisfied to proceed no farther until we shall have heard more.—Morning Herald. We regret that it is not yet in our power to relieve the anxious suspense in which the country has now been held for nearly a week upon the subject of the formation of a Ministry. We need not tell our readers, that on Saturday and yesterday a thousand conflicting rumours were in circulation, more of less connected with this engrossing subject. A crisis like the present is never barren of rumours. Many of those of the last two days were manifestly no more than the mere emanations of babbling surmise ; many of them the expressive indications of the hopes and the wishes of parties or individuals ; sonic of them perhaps the artful manceuvres by which politicians sought to promote ,the success of intrigues of their own, or to circumvent the intrigues of others. Having no authentic information as to what is going on, or none, at least, which we feel at liberty to lay before the world, we willingly spare our readers the repeti tion of reports and surmises which we could only re peat for the purpose of contradicting. It is probable that this day will not pass before something definitive will have- been concluded. It is almost certain that it will not pass without wild) having been explained. We believe, notwithstanding the contradiction of the Globe, that we were quite correct' in stating, as we did on Saturday, that " the attempt of Lord Mel bourne to make up an Administration out of the wreck of the Grey Cabinet" was " understood to have been signally unsuccessful." We.may venture also to express our belief that the project of a coalition Minis try, if it was ever seriously entertained in any quarter, is now finally abandoned.—Morning Post. Lord Melbourne again paid a visit to his Majesty yesterday at Windsor ; but what the object of that visit could be, except to report to his IVlajesty the total failure of his original mission—namely, that of form ing a mixed or coalition Cabinet, consisting of the principal persons on the opposition side of the House of Lords, in alliance with those of the dilapidated Cabinet. We are aware that it is not believed in well-informed quarters that any negociation of any kind has ever existed between the King's confidential adviser, Lord Melbourne, and the chiefs of the Tory party ; but we are, nevertheless, almost in a situation to prove that such a negociation has been attempted —that letters, answers, and replies have passed be tween the Duke of Wellington and Lord Melbourne on the one hand, and between the Lord Chancellor and Lord Rosslyn on the other. What the purport of ,these communications was, we have, of course, no means of informing our readers ; but at such a crisis, to what could they have related but the re modelling of the Cabinet ? Is there any sane person who would believe that they were of a purely com plimentary character, and had no reference to the political events of the day ? But there is another fact, and it is one of immense importance at this moment— and that is, thut no liberal Member of either House of Parliament has hitherto had any communication will:, Lord Melbourne. We take upon ourselves to state this to be the fact ; and we regret to be under the ne cessity of stating it, because although Lord Melbourne has the character of being a liberal statesman, and would not, we feel confident, form a part either of a coalition or of a Tory Government, we are of opinion that his Lordship has placed himself in a false posi- t- 7 .37-, 1r; ur2o:!-:.7.7,7.ing sut:ll a mission, Wt:er :h? mar, who stands by his Sovereign in doubtful Attd cult times ; but we know of no principle of morality, Or of political obedience, which can render it a duty on the part of a subject, to expose his character to the hazard of misconstruction, much less to the charge of unfaithfulness to the principles which he has always professed. Even as a negotiator on behalf of the King, Lord Melbourne ought not to have been seen in it— if he really, as we have but too much reason to believe, has had any thing to do with it. With regard to Mr. Stanley, we are bound in justice to that gentleman to state, that no application has been made to him, and that for the present, at least, he is inclined to court that retirement from public life, which, after his very ex traordinary and most unbecoming attack upon his late colleagues, we counselled him, in a very friendly manner to cultivate. Indeed, we believe we may state, that so sensible is he in every respect of the necessity of such retirement, and of the foolish part which he has played since he quitted office, that he will not again make his appearance this Session in the House of Commons. On the other hand, we are assured by the friends of Lord Melbourne that he has not failed in forming a Government, as we stated on Saturday, and that he will not fail. Please God that he may not ; but what sort of government are we to expect from one who is said to had dealings with the enemies of the people ? However, we take it for granted that all will still go well, and that if Lord Melbourne has, out of a false sense of duty to his Sovereign, erred in attempting, in obedience to his commands, to form a coalition Cabinet, he will not fail in forming a liberal Cabinet— no other, he may rest assured, will stand the test either of the present, or of any other, House of Commons that may succeed it. Corporation, ecclesiastical and legal reform, must be inscribed on the banners of the Go vernment that succeeds that of Lord Grey, and to a greater extent than would have been demanded from his. On this point there is no mistake, and can be no mistake. The declaration now in course of signature by the liberal Members of the House of Commons, including both Radicals and Whigs, sets that matter at rest.—(See the Chronicle article.) —The above ad dress—to their honour be it mentioned—proceeded rather from what may be termed the Whig-Radical side of the House, than from that which has hitherto been most prompt to support the late leader of the House of Commons—namely, from Mr. flume and Mr. Tennyson. The latter was, we are informed, the first to sign it, as well as the successful negotiator in amalgamating both Whigs and Radicals in one com mon bond. The task could not be an easy one—it could not be a pleasant one—but Mr. Tennyson no doubt felt that it was better that the liberal sides of the House should each abate some portion of their diffe rences, than risk the infliction of a Tory Government, by standing doggedly out for their own particular theories. Their decision is, in every respect, creditable to them; and though the names of flume and O'Con nell figure with a bad grace in the matter, after their recent conduct, yet shall we hail them as repentant sinners, and forgive the past for the sake of the future. That future is full of hope—so full of hope that we care not who will, or who will not, be appointed Pre mier, or who may form his staff. The King may ap point, but it is the House of :Commons which has— thanks to Lord Grey—the veto upon the selection.— Morning Advertiser. 'from the delays, however natural and necessary they may be, which have arisen and may still continue in the construction of a new Ministry, it is unavoid able that all sorts of surmises should be indulged both as to the cause and probable result of them. Saturday and yesterday were rich in the circulation of rumours that Lord Melbourne had failed, and left the cards to be shuffled by Lord Brougham—that Lord Brougham had also been scared from the attempt, and that a great personage had then summoned Sir It. Peel to his assistance,—and finally, that on the Right Hon. Baronet declaring a Tory Government to be at this moment impracticable, his Majesty had, though with much repugnance, thrown himself on the late Chan cellor of the Exchequer, with permission for his Lord ship to undertake the formation of a liberal Cabinet. We shall not trouble our readers by exposing the worthlessness of all these tales, but shall be content to make a remark or two on those subjects of general notoriety or apprehension which are beyond the pale of frivolous and idle gossip. The main anxiety which seems to disturb men's minds is, lest the Conservatives should force themselves upon the nation through the door which recent circum stances have opened for them. This anxiety has assumed the character of fear and alarm, on account of the temper which has been exhibited, and the language very lately employed by the chiefs of the Opposition. Our opinion of the Duke of Wellington's speech has been already given, in so far as concerned his Grace's personal demeanour towards Lord Grey, which, to say the least of it, was neither generous nor becoming ; but as it affected the public character of Lord Grey's Ministry, we are bound, by an impartial sense of jus tice, to repel in the most positive terms the accusation that the Government of the Noble Earl had been of a harsh, much less a sanguinary, character in its admi nistration of the criminal law towards capital offenders. It must be recollected that the practice of incendiary fires had grown up during the. Duke of Wellington's administration, and had reached a maturity of danger, with which, by Sir R. Peel's own confession, the Cabinet of that period found it impossible to cope. Nor, indeed, from a party which has been used to re gard physical force as the only effectual means of put ting clown the criminal movements of the multitude, was it quite reasonable, or at least guite natural, to expect an appeal to more composed and temperate remedies. However, Lord Grey came soon after into office, and the law was tried as a protection against the evil, which had been left uncontrolled by the vigorous policy of the Tories. Special com missions, which were praised as excellent measures by the Duke himself, were issued, and numerous con victions were obtained. But it is notorious that a lenient and merciful spirit was displayed by the Admi nistration in the treatment of the convicts found guilty of the offences then prosecuted, and we might refer for proof to the dissatisfaction expressed repeatedly by more than one of the learned Judges whose sentences of death had been set aside by his Majesty's advisers, and milder punishments inflicted. Even the detestable Irish Coercion Bill has been administered mildly by Lord Grey's Government, and a tolerant system of arbitration has been exhibited between hostile parties. So much for the candour of the Duke of Wellington towards a rival Statesman, at the moment also of his retreat from power, when some show of sympathy for advanced age, struggling unsuccessfully with deep emotion, might have been assumed, as an homage to good taste, without any impeachment of his Grace's dignity or manhood. But in the Duke of Wellington's speech on that occasion there were passages which carried with them a deeper and more extensive interest than any which could be derived from simple want of sensibility towards persons, or injustice towards political parties. The vehement censures of the noble Duke upon the policy of the Grey Cabinet in respect to foreign Governments and nations, were not mere passing sounds. They indicated a soreness at what Lord Grey had effected in the west and south of Europe since he had come into office, which can be no otherwise looked upon by the people of England or by their allies of France. Belgium, Por tugal, and Spain, than as sources of real danger to the peace of Europe, should the Tories come into power. The Duke of Wellington makes no secret of lamenting the establishment of the Belgic Government on its present footing—or the solidity of our league with France—or the success of Lord Grey's liberal Policy towards Spain and Portugal —or, in' short, the general assistance which has been given, though cer tainly not with too bounteous a hand, to the cause of freedom everywhere, and the consequent advancement of national right and principle, as con tradistinguished from despotic power. This avowal 1 , of the Noble Duke has filled even his Tory friends with alarm for the tranquillity of Europe. The people of England must be on their guard. If the Duke of Wellington disapprove the changes which have been made since he was Minister, in the state of Europe— if he would prefer the establishment of Miguel at Lisbon to that of Donna Maria—if he would prefer, as he is known to do, the dominion of Don Carlos, who has just left this country to make war upon his THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY, JULY 14, 1834) own, 1:c'fr)::: of Que:.n IF, :-..hclia it Madrid—if the Duke would like to the troops of Holland reoccu pying Antwerp and the south and wes shores of the Scheldt—if, finally, he would rejoice. at any pretext for breaking the friendly alliance with France, and throw ing this country into the arms of the three military Go vernments, let us ask the sober people of England, would their independence and commerce—would their financial system—would the internal tranquillity of the United Kingdom, and specifically that of Ireland— would the peace of Europe be in safe keeping if in trusted to the Duke of Wellington, thinking and feel ino. (as his Grace avows his thought s a nd sentiments to be) with such utter abhorrence of the policy which has been pursued by Great Britain for the last four years, and of the general state of Europe, with which that policy has been, and must be, inseparably con nected. There is nothing to us more obvious than that, whether embraced by a Conservative Minister as an instrument for the restoration of Tory sway in Eng land, or forced upon him by the general movement among Foreign Powers, a war throughout Europe would be the unavoidable, and, indeed, the speedy re sult of a Wellington and Peel Administration. The King, we are sure, must discern this consequence as clearly and readily as any of his subjects, and has an interest deeper than that of any one of his subjects in making it the rule of his own Royal decision.—Tinzes. We find in the Albion of Saturday the following paragraph : " We have just heard a report, to which we attach credit, that Lord Melbourne, on the part of his Majesty, has been in communication with the Duke of Wellington, Sir It. Peel, and Mr. Stanley. A letter from Lord Melbourne was de spatched to Mr. Stanley yesterday afternoon, at Tunbridge Wells. We have not heard whether he has returned to town." The above statement we acknowledge to be strictly true, but unfortunately for our sanguine contemporary, the purpose and object of the " communication" was to demonstrate beyond all room for cavil the impossi bility of any thing like a " coalition" Cabinet, not to assist in framing one. We may go further, and state that it is pretty well understood that Mr. Stan ley is fully aware of the impossibility, and we do not see how either the Duke of Wellington or Sir Robert Peel can at once sacrifice opinions most stre nuously and emphatically expressed, for the sake of coalescing with men who - are on their part con scientiously resolved not to make any concession at all. The King, therefore, will have to decide (it is probable that his Majesty has already decided) be tween an entirely Liberal and an entirely Tory Cabinet. If we may venture a conjecture, we should say that under the circumstances the King will give, or has given, full powers to Lord Melbourne to form a Liberal Cabinet. In the meantime intrigue and bustle are at work. Mr. Joseph Hume and his patrols are out in all directions to get signatures to the following requisition to Lord Althorp.—[This letter is given in the Chronicle article above.]—The object of this address is to prevail upon the Noble ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer to retain his office—but that he cannot do, for it is no longer at his own disposal ; or to re sume his office—but that step does not, we imagine, depend upon himself. The King must first recal the Noble Viscount, an act of favour to which we doubt whether William IV. will be much induced by the mandate, for such it will and ought to be regarded, of Mr. Hume and his round-robin brethren to force a Minister on the Crown. Respecting Lord Althorp, we shall merely say that he is a gentleman of amiable disposition, of honourable intentions, of easy temper, and popular acceptation with Members of the House of Commons. An able statesman he does not affect to be, and is not. As a leader of the House of Coin- mons, and Minister of the Crown, we affirm frankly that he .has been guilty of extraordinary indecisions and blunders, and has entailed serious mischiefs on the Cabinet of which he formed rather a prominent than an efficient member. He it was who by his own unlooked for and most unfortune caprice (for by what other name can we call it ?) prevented the revisal of the abominable Pension List. Is it for such a service as that that the Humes and the Whittle Harveys are to pull him back to the Treasury bench ? Is it for such a service that the country is to be canvassed in his favour ? Lord Althorp's financial ignorance and vacil lations had become a by-word of angry ridicule among all men who understood that most important branch of the national interests. His Lordship's languid and unresisting habit of procedure in the House of Com mons, which allowed the crude absurdities of every babbler, bent on currying favour with his constituents at the expense of the public business, to supersede the most urgent and important measures, and to waste the time of Parliament on idle words, may be fairly con sidered the true and chief cause of the late season of the year at which we are now arrived, without any one act of the least value to the country to show for it— no, not even a Coercion Bill I To merits like these it must be added, that Lord Althorp's communication to Mr. Littleton, who was not in the Cabinet, of a Cabinet secret which ought not to have passed his lips, and his permission to make the sub stance of the same secret known to Mr. O'Connell, the sworn enemy of the Government, was the im mediate. cause of all that followed—his own resig nation, that of Lord Grey, the break-up of the Government, the extreme difficulty of forming another, and the cruel interruption and stoppage at this late period of every branch of the national business ; so that how the session is to close b e f ore Mi c h ae l ma s or Christmas, he is a wise man that can inform us. This, we state broadly, and in perfect goodwill towards Lord Althorp, is the real catalogue of his merits as a Mi nister in the House of oommons ; and who they are that wish him back again it is very strange to think. As for the difficulty, or " impossibility I" for we have heard of such folly, about getting another leader, pray what would happen if Lord Althorp should, in the course of nature, be forced into the House of Lords ? Would not all England produce " another leader ?" We beg to be understood as meaning no shadow of offence by any of the foregoing observations. They have been wrung from us. We see the Government and Parliament a prey to weaknesses the most incre7 dible ; and, admitting that Lord Althorp is what all men report him, as upright, and estimable, and worthy a nobleman as ever did honour to the respectable name of Spencer, we cannot see the country sacrificed to personal and puerile predilections. A Cabinet may be formed with Lord Althorp as one of it, but it may also be very well formed without him. The country does not want Lord Althorp, though the House of Com mons, for reasons which of course we must not express, may still be anxious to be under the protection of so enlightened and infallible a leader.—Tint s. CONSERVATIVE LIBERALITY.—We understand that a certain unsuccessful candidate for the representation of a burgh not fifty miles from Edinburgh, has been " Deserted in his utmost need, By those his former bounty fed," . . _ and left to pay the whole of his electioneering expenses, which may probably amount to more than 3,000/.1 This is really " too bad," considering that the honourable gentleman alluded to came forward solely to support the Conservative interest, and from no desire to flatter his own pride, or advance his own interests, by receiving the addition of M. P. to his cognomen. The boldness and alacrity which the gentleman referred to displayed in the Tory cause, certainly deserved better acknow ledgment from the rank, wealth, and intelligence," of a great city ; but there is no accounting for some instances of human peccability ; and here stands the champion of the Con servative interest alone and unrewarded for his gallant services, " sighing to the south winds" for ver y gr i e f o f T o ry ingrati tude.—,Scotsman. HISTORY OF THE COMMONERS OF ENGLAND. —The 7th Part of this interesting work by Mr. Burke, form ing a Companion to the Peerage and Baronetage, is now pub lished. It comprises among other eminent families those of Lane Fox of Bramham Park, Stonor of Stonor, Whitmores of Apley and Dudmaston, Spencer of Bramley Grange, Myttons of Halston, Garth and Penylan, Gough of Perry Hall, Wither of Manydown and Tangier Park, Tregonwell of Anderson, Guthrie of Guthrie, Anguish of Somerleyton Hall, Streat field of Chiddingstone, Dyott of Freeford Hall, Bramston of Skreens, Cartwrights of Aynho and Norwell, Spearman of Thornley, Parker of Whiteway, Barry of Lemlara, Elwes of Great Billing, Isted of Ecton, Thornton of Brockall, Huntley of Boxwell, Repington of Amington, Wingfields of Tieken cote and of Onslow, Bruce of Kennet. Tate of Delapre and Burleigh Park, Owens of Tedsmore, Betws, Woodhouse and Condover, Lloyd of Gloster, Winter of Ayer, Coulson of Bien kinsopp Castle, Blundel of Crosby, Hunter of Hunterston, Pennefather of New Park, Scott of Betton and Peniarth Ucha, Walronds of Bradfield and Dulforp, Cookson of Whitehill, Moore of Moorefield, Fortescues of Fallapit and Buckland Filleigh, O'Connell of Derrynane Abbey, Greame of Sewerby House, Swetenham of Somerford Booths, Harvey of Rolls Parks, Kelso of Dankeith, Patrick of Treaine, Cunninghtune of Caddell and Thornton, Ettrick of High Barnes, &c. &c. 1 - 10 - usE or Loßus„TuLy -4161:*. The Lord Chancellor, ford Wharnoliffe, and Lord Cloncurry sat this morning to hear appeals. • THE MARQUIS OF DONEGAL V. SALT AND OTHERS. The arguments in this appeal, which have occupied se veral days, were concluded this morning. Judgment postponed until the opinion of the Judges could be obtained on several legal points. LORD MAYOR'S COURT, JULY 12. (Before the RECORDER.) CHAMBERS V. LONGMAN AND CO. Mr. GURNEY stated this case, which was one of attach ment. Mr. Jerdan, editor of the Literary Gazette, is in debted to a plaintiff, who is a tailor, in the sum of 315/., and understanding that the Defendants, the well-known publishers, had moneys of Mr. Jerdan's in their hands, they having the payment of his salary as editor of the Literary Gazette, and also the payment of his share of the profits as part proprietor of that publication, he brought this action against them. The Defendants resisted the action on the ground that they had no moneys in their hands belonging to Mr. Jerdan. W. A. Scripps was then examined—ls publisher of the Literary Gazette; was so in December last ; his son re ceived the moneys on account of the Literary Gazette. Has seen some of the partners of the house of Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Co., of late ; the proceeds for the sale and advertisements of the Literary Gazette are paid over to Longman and Co. weekly. Has had no conversa tion with the partners in Longman and Co.'s house on the subject of money which they had in their hand belonging to Mr. Jerdan. John Angus examined—ls clerk in the house of Long man and Co. Knows Mr. Scripps, the publisher of the Literary Gazette. He is in the habit of handing money over to Longman and Co. weekly on account of the Lite rary Gazette. Does not know what sum Mr. Jerdan re ceives as editor of the Literary Gazette. Had always heard that Mr. Jerdan was part proprietor of that publica tion, but never heard any thing on the subject from either of the partners of the firm of Longman and Co. Never understood from them that they had any money in their hands belonging to Mr. Jerdan. The Jury accordingly returned a verdict for the De fendants. SHERIFF'S COURT, RED LION -SQUARE, JULY 12, HOEDER V. ASHTON.---SOLDIERS' DEBTS. The defendant in this case is a corporal in the Ist Regi ment of Life Guards, and the plaintiff the landlord of the Rose and Crown public-house immediately opposite to the Knightsbridge Barracks. The Court was crowded with Life Guardsmen, and appeared more like a Military Court Martial than a Court of Common Law. Mr. DERBISHIRE, for the plaintiff, stated that his client came into Court reluctantly —by actual compulsion. The action was originally brought for the small sum of 3/.65. lid., two pounds of which had been lent on the 30th of Decem ber, 1832. The remainder constituted the corporal's score, run up in 1831 and 1832, when his regiment occupied the barrack in the neighbourhood. There was something rather singular in the transaction ; for the plaintiff, finding that by a clause in the Mutiny Act soldiers were protected from arrest in execution for all debts , under 30/., and that there was no prospect for him, did not relish the idea of paying costs, and would have stayed the action altogether, had not the defendant forced him, by a Judge's order, to give a pe remptory undertaking to go to trial. The scores of publi cans were, it was well known, kept with a chalk or a slate pencil ; but the corporal's own acknowledgment, and some circumstantial matters, would supply the apparent defect. Three witnesses proved that the defendant frequented the plaintiff's house, and that he sometimes paid for what was delivered to him, and sometimes " stuck it" against the wall. They also stated that he admitted that he owed money to the plaintiff, and that he would pay it when he could. This was the only proof given of the debt. Mr. HARNETT (attorney for the defendant) described the conduct of the plaintiff as most vexatious towards his client. In fact, the corporal owed nothing for his score, and was on guard at the Horse Guards the whole of the day named as that on which he was said to have borrowed the money ; so that the loan was all a farce. Verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount of his demand. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. WESTERN CIRCUITT—WiNcnEsrEa, JULY 12. The Judges will not dine on this occasion at Strathfield saye, as had been hitherto customary, on the day previous to the Commission. Mr. Justice PATTESON opened the Commission on Thursday, and went to the Cathedral on Friday ; but Lord DENMAN did not arrive here until one o'clock on Friday, and, what is also very unusual, he went to Court without having previously attended divine service, a circumstance which astonished some of the natives. The calendar is not heavy. It contains only thirty-two names, of which there are three for arson, one for a rape, and the remainder for ordinary offences. The cause list is unusually long ; there are twenty-one causes entered for trial, of which five are to be tried by Special Juries. Mr. Justice PATTESON presides in the Crown Court, and Lord DEN:ILAN in the Civil Court. (Before Lord DENMAN and a Common Jury.) SEDUCTION--JOSEPH V. CAVENDEN. The Plaintiff is an old clothes-dealer ; the Defendant a tobacconist, carrying on business in Portsmouth. This was an action for the seduction of the Plaintiff's daughter. Sarah Joseph, a very pretty and interesting-looking girl, nineteen years of age, was the daughter of the Plaintiff. In October last, as she was passing by, the Defendant, who is a widower with three children, called her in to take a mes sage to her father. When she went to his parlour he asked her what she thought of settling herself in the world ? She said that she could not think of abandoning her religion, as she was of the Jewish persuasion. " Nonsense," said he, " I'll make you happy." He put his hand on her mouth. She fainted, and did not recover for half an hour, when she found herself much flurried. " thank you," said she, " now that you have first ruined me, to perform your pro mise and marry me." " I'll do it before a month," said he. He requested her not to tell her father. She saw him again about a week or ten days afterwards, but not since. She is now in the family way. Her father found it out in May last, and sent her to Mrs. Child's to lodge, to whom he pays 235. a week for her board and lodging. As she performed the domestic duties, her father was obliged to hire a servant in her stead. Cross-examined by — Mr. Sergeant BOMPAS.—Never spoke to the defendant before this took place, though he used to have dealings with her father. Never saw her brother or father since she left on the 3d of May. Never saw her father's attorney until this morning. He did not call to examine her. The question being repeated to her by the Court she recollected that the attorney called on her on Wednesday in this town. Mr. Sergeant BOMPAS, for the defendant, observed that no man could be safe, if they pronounced a verdict for the plaintiff on such evidence as that of his daughter, who contradicted herself. He would call several witnesses to show that she had long since abandoned the paths of virtue. Several witnesses having given evidence to that effect, Lord DENMAN told the jury that if they believed her to be so profligate as to require no solicitations to seduce her, their verdict should be for the defendant ; but if they thought that she had merely erred in a few instances, and that her mind had not been entirely debauched before her knowledge of the defendant, their verdict should be for the plaintiff. Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 40s. HOME CIRCUIT.—HERTFORD, JULY 11. CIVIL SIDE.-PATNIORE V. NICHOLSON. Mr. CLAnicsoN opened the pleadings. The plaintiff, George Peter Patmore, claimed the balance of a year's sa lary, which the defendant had contracted to pay him as edi tor of the County Press newspaper. The defendant denied the contract, and pleaded a set-off to more than the plain tiff's claim. Mr. THEsstoEa stated the facts of the plaintiff's case. Th e plaintiff, a gentleman of great literary talent, had long been the editor of the Court Journal, a publication of con siderable note in London. The defendant was a most re spectable solicitor at Hertford. In 1831, Mr. Nicholson having heard of the merits and abilities of Mr. Patmore, he became anxious to effect an engagement with him to edit a paper professing Tory politics, to be circulated through the county. And, accordingly, on the sth of July, Mr. Patmore entered upon his duties as editor of the County Press ; it being un d erstoo d t h at, as he was the editor of a Londonjournal, his attendance at Hertford would not be required more than one, or at most two days in the week. The salary then agreed upon was 2251. a year, the 251. be ing allowed for travelling expenses, and he was to have apartments provided for him in the town. On these terms the paper was published. It met with extreme success ; so much so that every one considered he was not sufficiently remunerated for his services, and an increase of payment wa s proposed to him in his character of editor. Mr. Patmore engaged a gentleman named Evans as sub-editor, whose duty it was constantly to attend at Hertford, to superintend the getting out of the paper. A meeting took place be tween the plaintiff and the defendant in the presence of Evans, to agree upon the terms on which the new ar rangement was to be conducted. The sum of money offered Patmore, out of which he was to pay a sub-editor, and other expenses not connected with the printing and stationery, was not then accepted, as the plaintiff did not consider the remuneration sufficient for his services. It was 11.30 proposed that the day c. , fpublieatim should I;ft from Tuesday, the day on which the Count,d ' changed was orizinally published, to Saturday, the same ` ) .av as the rival publication appeared. This took place or . , t h e ' ij t i, o f July, 1833. On the 15th of September tb 4 letter to the defendant, which was pr-,, plaintiff wrote a Evans (the letter was read). `tented to him by Mr. T - to edit the pap er , pay sub-editor 1 , b.nd me e t o th er inciden iDiaintiff asked 6001 . tats. The defendant expressed :iimself willi ng t o agree to the terms p ro p ose d , and Mr : Evans w as engage d b y M r. Patmore at 100/. a year 'salary. Ho wever, in March, 1833, plaintiff su dd en l y ' received notice of discharge from Mr. Nicholson. It w",is admitted that the salary was re gularly paid up to - !anuary, and the plaintiff claimed the balance of his salary to the end of the year, which was about 250/, the sum which he now hoped to have the ver dict of the Jury for. Mr. Evans knew Mr. Patmore. Knew him in July, 1832. Was then editor of the Court Journal. In July, 1832, witness was engaged as sub-editor, at 100/. per an num, horsekeep, &c., salary to be paid by Mr. Patmore. After he was engaged he saw Mr. Nicholson and Mr. Pat more together. There was a great deal of conversation. No proposition was made by Mr. Nicholson. Mr. Nichol son wished Mr. Patmore to come down two days a week. On Tuesdays were the latest days he could come on ac , count of his engagements, or at the higher rate of salary. No engagement was come to. Witness had several com munications with Mr. Nicholson. He delivered the letter of September 15, 1832, to Mr. Nicholson. (The letter was then read.) On the following 'week Mr. Patmore came to Hertford. Witness had been previously engaged. Saw Mr. Nicholson, but he said nothing on the subject of the letter. Mr. Nicholson might have mentioned the en gagement with Mr. Patmore, but not in any precise terms. He said, I think, " Now I have acceded to his terms." I received money from Mr. Nicholson for Mr. Patmore. Once a bill of 1001., more than once 50/. He judged it to be for the salary. He had received 501.-100/. I think a cheque for 100/. After 15th September, Mr. Patmore came down on an average twice in three weeks. Witness went to London every week, as sub-editor, to consult with Mr. Patmore. In his judgment Mr. Patmore conducted the paper properly. The paper was changed from Tuesday to Saturday for publication. In March, 1833, he found his place was occupied by Mr. Bayley. At my request Mr. Nicholson offered me a situation on the County Press. The application was by letter for the sub-editorship. By Mr. Sergeant ANDREWS--Mr. Nicholson answered his letter. He had reported for the Atlas. He never had the management of a paper. The engagement he had was with Mr. Patmore. At first when he was engaged, Mr. Patmore came down regularly, not so after ; and his con duct became the subject of complaint by Mr. Nicholson frequently. They had an interview, and there were many complaints made. The market columns were sent from London. He (witness) collected local information. A Mr. Gardener was employed before he came down. He had no particular instructions where to go. Mr. Staughton complained that he did not, get the copy in time. Over-set matter was sometimes a waste. He never knew five columns over-set. It frequently happened that matter was over-set. The London markets were sent by a Mr. Gar dener in time. He had not heard Mr. Patmore and Mr. Nicholson. After September Mr. Patmore never said, " I will go, and take Mr. Evans with me." Mr. Patmore said his time was more valuable in London. He recol lected something about distress, even in tears ; it was in consequence of something that passed between him and Mr. Nicholson. It might very likely be in consequence of his having to go if Patmore went. Re-examined by Mr. THESSIGER—Nothing from Hat field was ever purposely put aside. He had been once at Hatfield House to report a dinner. Mr. Sergeant ANDREWS for the defendant, observed it was certainly a most extraordinary mode of proving the plaintiff's case, to rest it simply upon the evidence of Mr. Evans, whose testimony merely went to prove that the, de fendant had said, " Now that I have acceded to Patmore's terms, &c." From such evidence was it to be inferred that there was a contract, and that the plaintiff was to receive a salary of 600/. a year ? He must say it was impossible. The letter of the plaintiff dated September 15, 1832, proved that, instead of an increase, a reduction in the expenditure of the Paper was contemplated. Another letter of the plaintiff would prove that in July, 1832, the plaintiff wished to know if his services were likely to be per manently employed on the paper, and proposing, on the re ceipt of an extra 100/. per annum, to make arrangements in London for obtaining advertisements, which could not be got to the paper by any other means. In that letter the plain tiff observed that the newspapers and magazines cost about 651. per annum, and requested to be allowed that sum, or even less, say 50/., for procuring them from his own re sources. How would that fact correspond with a contras for 6001. a year ? Evidence, with letters of the plaintiff, were then put in. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, Damages 10 POLICE INTELLIGENCE. BOW-STREET. John Richards, a stout-made young fellow, was placed at the bar handcuffed, and with his legs tied together with strong ropes, charged with begging in the streets, and also with assaulting two of the new police. He was committed for one month to the House of Cor rection. UNSTAMPED PUBLICATIONS.—John Bulger and George Walls, were brought up in custody of Poulson, one of the Stamp Office employees, charged with selling the People's Hue and Cry, and the Weekly Police Gazette. Poulson, accompanied by Scattergood, met Bulger in Russel -court, Drury-lane. They purchased a Police Ga zette of him, and they afterwards met Wall in Middle row, St. Giles's, of whom the purchased the Hue and Cry paper. These were both unstamped newspapers. Wall, when taken into custody, threw himself down upon the pavement, roaring out " Rescue !" The mob began to en courage him, and b u t f or t h e ass i stance of one of the F. di vision, he would have escaped. Bulger asserted that it was his first offence ; but Wall, on the other hand, was recog nised as an old offender. _ _ Mr. MlNsffuLL said that some punishment must be in flicted on Bulger, whom he committed for fourteen days to the House of Correction. With regard to Wall, recog nised as an old offender, he must be committed for two months. Such publications must be put a stop to ;it was the determination of Government to stop them, and in fu ture he should in such cases inflict the utmost penalty of the law. MARYLEBONE. A pretty-looking girl, about seventeen years of age, named Charlotte Brooks, was charged with having robbed her father of a gold watch of considerable value, together with a splendid gold neckehain and other costly articles of jewellery, &c., to a large amount, under the following cir cumstances :—The prosecutor, Mr. Edward Brooks, an extensive livery-stable keeper, residing in Seymour-mews, Upper Berkeley-street, deposed that his daughter (the prisoner), who from her infancy had lived under his roof, suddenly absconded from her home on Friday, after break fasting with the family as usual, and that shortly after her departure he discovered that a box and drawer in an upper apartment, in which were placed a massive gold neck chain, a gold watch, a valuable cameo shawl, several hand some gold seals, rings, brooches, &c., had been deprived of their contents. He immediately gave information of the robbery at the Police-office, and accompanied by Collard, one of the officers of the establishment, proceeded in search of her, and found her walking down the Strand; she was taken into custody and conveyed to the station-house. Joseph Collard, after he apprehended the prisoner on Friday afternoon, as before stated, ascertained with some difficulty that she rented apartments, which she had only a few days before taken, at No. 6, Queen -street, Seven Dials, where he afterwards found in one of her boxes a gold buckle, several pieces of silk, and a gold watch, together with other articles of jewellery, &c. ; also a variety of du plicates for other property recently pledged ; the gold chain, to which four small gold seals, a key, and a ring were at tached, was found in her pockets at the station-house, and the cameo shawl was taken from her neck. Mr. Howse, No. 9, High-street, Bloomsbury ; Mr. Sow erby, Long Acre ; Mr. Walmsley, No. 100, Drury-lane, and other pawnbrokers, produced a quantity of valuable pro perty pledged at various times by the prisoner, all of which was identified by her father. • She said nothing in her defence, and was fully committed to Newgate for trial. . . NELSON AND WELLINGTON.—A commiss ion is about to be given, by the Junior United Service Club, for two portraits, one of Nelson the other of Wellington, we believe ; and as individuals are canvassing the subscribing members for the job, we would suggest, as the best means of having them well done, that they should be left to open competition—the choice to be determined by the vote of the officers themselves. It is evident that the materials for such portraits are equally accessible to all parties, as in the case of the Duke, the helmeted marshal of forty, rather than the trencher capped chancellor of sixty, will be the character selected, while in that of Nelson, the course is obvious, as nature cannot here be referred to. We fear patronage will prevail. —Magazine of Fine Arts. On Friday se'nnight, in consequence of a quarrel arising from jealousy, two men named Robert Cooke and Richard Price fought at Linley, near Bishop's Castle. They met by agreement, and fought sixty rounds with the utmost fury, occupying one hour and a half, when the consequence was the death of Robert Cooke. Richard Price, the anta gonist, lies in a dangerous state ; and it is lamentable to add, that one of the seconds in the fight is a brother of the deceased, and that the father was also present with two other sons The Coroner's Jury brought in a verdict of " Manslaughter" against Richard Price, William Thomas, and William Cooke_ the first as the principal, and the two latter as aiding and assisting. " DUTCH PAPER HELVOETSLI:I73, JULY morning W wets i f floured with a visit, of his Royal Highness Prince Fre ue. rick, who having come through the canal in•.the stearn:.boat, proceeded up the.riv - er to receive her Maie"l the Queen of E ng l an d, w i t h her suite, in the Dutch terre tory. The st eam -b oat reac h ed i n sight of the harbour Royal George yacht, which was towed up the river by an English steam-b oa t, an d hi s R oyal Highness Prince Fre,°,,r, rick, in wh ose s u it e was t h e D u k e of Saxe Weimar ana"'' son, went on board. The guns on the ramparts fired 08 ' lutes at intervals. The flotilla of five gun-boats and two brigs, stationed 1 the harbour, als o fi re d a t intervals, and the crews man°, the yards. A n E ng li s h b r i g, w hi c h was towed by an E`'`'t lish steam-boat, returned the salute. The steam -bo a which to we d th e y ac h t f an aground at the entrance of t , canal, in conseque nce o f w hi c h, t h e yac h t itself also stu c k fast, and her Majesty and suite were obliged to go on boa r the .Dutch steam-boat,, and so proceed to Rottercial During the night, at high water, the two vessels got all° ° „; and are now at anchor in the road. This morning , t° ,l Dutch steam-boat came back for her Majesty's suite a° baggage ; and the English brig has sailed, as we hear , bring in the Castor English frigate, of 48 guns, which 15 in sight. TilE HAGUE, JULY 9.—Baron Verstolk Van Sol e° having returned yesterday e v e n i ng f rom t h e L oo, where be had an audience of his Majesty, has resumed his funet o as Minister for Foreign Affairs. The Queen of England, after her arrival at RotteT(l accompanied by his Royal Highness Prince Frederick , a s we have already stated, came in the strictest incognito this town, and alighted at the residence of the Duke of Saxe-Weimar. The day before yesterday, in the aft er ; noon, her Maj es t y re t urne d to R otterdam, whence she wa to go by the steam-boat to Nitneguen. NIMEGUEN, JULY B.—Yesterday afternoon their RO Highnesses the Prince of Orance and his eldest son arrive; here to r ece i ve h er M a j esty the Queen of England, o'll4 was expected. A n es t a f ette , h owever, having b r ought word that her Majesty would not arrive till to -day' their Royal Highnesses immediately went to the L ° ?; whence they returned to this pl ace a t t h ree o ' c l oc k ti ,, g afternoon. At seven h er M ajesty t h e Queen of Eng i a ll arrived, acc om p an i e d b y h er b rother, the Duke of S°e Meiningen, an d a very numerous suite. She came, fr°'„, 7. Rotterdam, an d a li g ht e d at t h e Pl aats Royal, where be Majesty was rece i ve d b y hi s R oya l Highness the Pr i nce o f Orange, and stopped nearly an hour. Her Majesty t e r proceeded t o Cl eves, w h ere she w i ll pass the night. ti le r Majesty was saluted by 33 guns on passing the Waal. c 5 Their Royal Hi g h nesses t h e P r i nce of Orange and son set out for the L oo , am id st the accl amations Of t' numerous spectators, and w ill return t h rough the &ere 15 to-morrow night, on their way to the army. Next Sunday, in the afternoon, her Majesty the Que: eo of Bavaria, Who is going t o s p en d some t i me at Scheveo; gen for the benefit of sea b a thi ng , w ill pass through °LI city, on board the Louis steam-boat, which is gone to Lea' pold's Haven to take her Majesty on board. THE HAGUE, JULY 11.—Yesterday evening his Mai 4 arrived here from the Loo. DUTCH FUNDS—AataTERDAM, JULY 11. Actual Debt, 2% per Cent. Annort Syndic, 4% rer cen t Ditto, ditto, 3,4 per cent. Loan of 1830, 5 per cent lO '% to 101 Ditto, 1831 and 1E32, 5 per Cent 9734 to 97% Exchange on London l2 15 Ditto, two months l2 10 0734 —Dutch Papers, July 12. BRUSSELS AND GERMAN PAPERS. BRUSSELS, JULY 10.—Th e Ki ng and Queen t t he Belgians left Paris on the 7th, at eleven in the moreuv°, They were to arrive a t R ouen on the Bth, and to-day at t b o f Chateau of Eu ; there they will meet the Royal FamilY 3 France. They are expected on the 12th at TournaY , ' at Brussels on Sunday next. Nearly two hundred witnesses have been summoned the part of the prosecution in the affair of the riots i ; Brussels. Th e w it nesses summoned on the part o f t accused are equal in number. • Almost all the Officers of the. Staff at Brussels . are 6 0 5 moned as witnesses ; even many of the Commissaries Police are summ o n e d, so th at on l y three will remain h e re to do duty. n 1 Troops contin ue t o p rocee d f rom Antwerp to the e—e 4 at Brussebact ; a grea t part o f the field-artillery is expec t there. The Chamber discussed yesterday some of the artic le : of the Commercial Law, but will suspend the discussiait to-day in order to take up that of the Corn T r ade• we may judge by the endless debates on the law relatl; to the duties on li nens , we may presume that that on t he corn trade will al so g i ve occas i on to long debates, and ta ke up several sittings. e regret this interruption, because we consider the commercial law as much more important. We could bal e s wished that the Chamber had followed the advice of Minister of the Interior to proceed with the commerciall law, especially as it seems to us that some members tbili of leaving Bruss e l s as soon as the law on the corn trade anoth er is voted, which wou ld d e l ay t h e commercial law to WO' session. hAt BRUSSELS, JULY 1 1 .—W c l earn from Tournay, te-4, :be King and Queen will cer t a i n l y arr i ve there on PP ,urday, M.. Jobert, one of the persons ordered to quit the kil' dom, and who was lately arrested at Ghent, and convel o by the gensd' armes t o O sten d , was embarked on the n igh of the Bth on board the steam-boat for London. A traveller who arrived at Brussels from Holland l eg ; terday affirms that when the Queen of England arrived ~1 Rotterdam, th e popu l ace co l lected and received her Wl' hootings and cries of " Down with the English." The Chamb er commence d yesterday the debate on t - corn law, which was b roug h t forward by M. Eloy, .h 4 opposed in a powerful speech by M. Meens, w h o prove t that prohibit or y l aws never h ave any other effect than t bs of making the commune pay for the advantage of the P r a li ducer. We cannot follow the Honourable.Member 11l its developements, but we wish they may have made su s an impression on the Chamber as to induce it to re ject,. law which would gi ve a p r i v il ege to the producer to ti` prejudice of the consumer ; t h at i s to say, would bur den the generality in favour of the minority. BRUSSELS, JULY 1 l.—Actual Debt, 2i per Cent., 5/ t, Rothschild' s L oan , 5 per C ent., 97i. Loan of the C'"' 1832, 4 per Cent., 971.—Brussels Papers, July 12. MUNICH, JULY 3.—His Majesty set out yesterday 0 147 " . inc , ' for Bruckm an . The Session of the Assembly of the States was close! . to-day by the Prince o f W a ll enste i n. A medal has bee' struck in commemoration of the Assembly. BERLIN, JUNE 30.—A1l our Ministeri a l departmen; have been very bu s ily engage d f or some days past. foreign department seems to be unnecessarily occulo o with the result s o f th e C ongress at Vienna, and with t' French and E ng li s h , re l at i ve to Spain and the affairs of Svil s , zerland. bb e CASSEL, JULY 6.—The Paroles d'un Croyant of A La Mennais is now prohibited in Hesse.—Frakfort Pap erd July 8. VIENNA, Jv l, v 2.—Five per Cent. Metalliques, 9911F 0b per Cents., 901 ; B an k Shares, 1,260.—A//genteine 2eitii"7" July 7. ~4 PROCESSION OF THE CHOLERA ORPHANS' ; if On Sunday se' nn i g h t t h e c hil dren whose parents unbaPP:bo fell victims to th e c h o l era, walked in procession through principal streets of our city, followed by a number of cars, bo which were th e nurses w h o are employed in taking care of t 0 children. We regret much that the funds appropriates' such a benevolent object as the maintaining, clothingl 11 4 educating those helpless orphans, who would otherwise Po been thrown on the world, are so scanty, that it was thcogo necessary to parade them thus, in order to induce the cid!' of Dublin to contribute to their support,—DublinDespat_c2.le, BIRTHS. hurr On the 11th inst , Mrs. Woolfrey Middleditch, of Barns park, Islington, of a daughter. of On the 11th inst., at Stamford -hill, Mrs. Ames Winsta.nleit a daughter. On th 3 Bth inst., at Rich mon d -h ouse , T w i c k en h am, the lA' °I Robert Parry Niset, Esq., of a daughter. of , On the 12th inst., in Doughty -street, Mrs. J. H. Benboir, son still-bo rn . 1 On the 11th inst., Mrs. Whittem, Little Q ueen -street, Line° lo Inn-field s , o f a son, who survived but a few hours. MARRIAGES. On the 12th inst.. by a special license, at Syon, the seat.° o l Grace the D u k e o f N o rthumbe r l an d , Viscount Holmesciale, surviving son of Earl Amherst, to Miss Gertrude Percy, f° l daughter of the Lord Bishop of Carlisle and niece to the ko rr i Beverley. The ceremony was p er f ormed by the Lord B ie of Carlisle, and the bride given aw ay b y his Grace the Duke o f thumberland. o tiO On the 3d inst., at the Chateau d l'lsle de Noe (Gers), ' a t k g R. H. Manners, R.N., to Louisa Jane, eldest daughter ° Comte de Noe, Pair de France. On the 12th inst., Mr. T. D. Taylor, of Holborn, to Miss 504 of Camden-town. DEATHS. AIeP On the 12th inst., in Great George-street, Westminster , of' Copland, Esq., of Gunnersbury Park, in this county, in his 611 / 0 0 On the llth inst., at Bush Hill, Mary Anne, the wife o gi Currie, Esq. On the 12th inst., Annie, daughter of Charles Murray, - E64 ' ' Dorset -square. On the 12th inst., Charlotte, youngest daughter of J. A. Iv i°' ing, Esq., Cl a ph am - common, age d 15. g oi* On the 11th i ns t., a t C ant l ey, N orfolk, in her 29th years wife of William Alexander Gilbert, Esq. Ea' Di* On the 12th inst., at Kensington, in her 20th year, I.o ocfi s second daughter of Mr. Th omas Palmer, of the Rolls Chap On the Bth of February, a t Ki r k ee, East Indies, Lieut. ~q,, Ellis, of the 4th Light D ragoons, third son of R. Ellis, P. Torrington-square. London : Printed and Published by AIURDO YOv' at The Sun Office, No. 112, Strand. NO DAy 1 , CI SEL ck n i ant; C the txhil .u, E 13, Ox{ to aTino ord ered their u n " brussels russels ,'gant i t 3d. C Silky Ni ftshc on , i t e o 4 ° , led Oven t 2,51. about t o Pubtusly lON A