The Sun. — London, England, 1831-08-12 00:00:00

EtoND BUN OFFICE, Sez , en o'clocA. THE LONDON GAZETTE OF THIS EVENING, St. James's P.Jart. Aug. 10. 'the King wag this day pleasedt , " conferthe houctur OcKbi,ht.. hood upon hieut-Gen. John F'mith, tr.'Sva!_ . Knight Grand Cross of Uri Rovil litino - vOrCat! k.' , Aelphic Guard. The King rya.:this day pleased tO lne honour Of Knight. hood upon John Rennie, Esq., of ”.-Intehall-pluce. DECLARATIONS OF INSOLVEIiqs "IA:ILIA A M DUTTON, Basin ghall-strect, r. h stealers, iJEORiGE PEUDNEY, Deptford, ra4YeFill'usher, BANK s. 11 EN v ILSON, RidiVOlouse-lane, Marylebone, thnher merciaant, to surrendet . AnUst 16, at one, Sept. 2, and' .3, at two, at the Court of CottlMbsioners. Williams, APlrd - -Plkee, Bed. ford-square. LUKE BUTTRESS, London-tercaM iladkriey-Yoad, builder, August If, at twelve, '26, asst Serk. a t t One, ' , it the Court of Comia'ssioners. Comyn, Belvidere-plate, SonthWark-britige.road. JOHN JAMES, Meeling-housetourt., Old Jewry, merchant, August lit, at tot, '3O, and Sept. , at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. Abbott and hthey, Symond's-Inn, Chancery erre. JOSEPH WILSON ; Liverpool, draper, August :30, 31, and Sew. 21, at nine, at the Albion Ilotel, Manchester. Law and' Codes, Manchester; Adlingtou, Gregory ; and Yaulkner, Bed ford-row. TITUS DEWHURST, Livo - rool, ironmonger, August 30, and Sept. 21, at two, at the Clarendon-rooms, Liverpool. Leigh, (4eorce-street, 7.-",alision-brazse ; Leather, Li';erpool. EDWARD COWLING, Poultry, haberdasher, August 19, .26 s and Sept. 23, at twelve, at the Court of k'ommissioners. WU and Lawrence, Bueklereburn, Yneapsule. JAMES BUCKLER, Covcn'tV, builder, August '29, 30, and Sepr...2l‘, at twelve, at the King's Head Inn, Co, entry. Byrne, Cook‘v.rourt, Lincoln's-inn, London ; Carter and Hewes, iarctmtry. WILLIAM lIEBBT.EWHITE, Manchester, erituni,sion agent, August 21, 10, and Sept. 23, at three, at the office of Messrs. Htmghton and Broadhurst, Liverpool, knngton, Gre gory, and Faulkner, Bedford-mw, London ; Houghton and Broadhurst, Liverpool. JAMES porn-, Liverpool, coal-merchant, August 29, 30, and Sept. 23, at two, at the office of Messrs. Houghton and Broadhurst, Liverpool. Adlington, Gregory, and Faulkner, Bedford-row, London; Houghton and Broadliust ; Thriple.place, London. _ _ _ _ ........ WALTER PAI.7+IER, Pencoyd, Hatford, c'othier, August ‘..?9, 30, and Sept. at eleven, at the Green Dragon Hotel, I Icrerord. Smith and Son, Bed Lion-square, London ; Hall and Humtry,, Rose. WWII, IA N TEiIFiI,BY, Ibstock, Leicester, farmer, August :34, '2i, and Sept. '23, at eleven, at the Oueen's Head Inn, Ashbv de-la-Zoueh, Leicester. Austen and Hobson, Itaymond-buila ngs, Gray's Inn, London; Green, Ashby-de-la-Zouch. SUPPLEMENT to tlic CMZETTE. CORONATION OF THEIR MAJESTIES. Earl Marshal's Office, Whitehall, August 12, 1831. His Majesty having been pleased to dispense at the ensuing Coronation with the usual Procession from Westminster Hall to the Abbey, whereby certain lemons who heretofore forllitsd part of the Ceremonial would be precluded from attemrbog the so lemnity, notice is hereby given, that tickets, tit trauferable, but for the personal admission only of them individuals who, from the official apoointments respectively held and enjoyed by them, would have been admitted into the Abbey, had the Pro— cession taken place, will be issued by the Earl-Marshal to those who tsar signify their wish to be present at the approaching volemnity. All such persons are, therefore, required to sigltifv their desire to the Earl-Marshal, at his office, on or babre the 3th day of this instant August, atter which net application can be at tended to. GEO. NAYLER, Garter. DI PERIM, PA II 1,1A31 ENT THIS EVENIMi. HO USE OF COMMONS. The !!_ 4 I'EAKER took the Chair shortly after Three o'clock. Mr. HEYWOOD presented a petition from the Cham ber of Commerce in Manchester, praying that permission • be granted to refine foreign sugars in England ; also a petition from Ashton-under-Line against the hours of labour in factories; a petition from Manchester against the liability of Landlords' Bill ; and a petition from the Members of the 7teelisnies' Institute at Bolton in Lancashire, against the -kites on knowledge Lord MORPETII presented three petitions, from Leeds, H ilifax, and Dewsbury, numerously and respectably eiened, praying that some system of perm inent and legal p °vision may be made for the relief of the poor of Ireland. Mr. SADLER supported the prayer of the petitions :and urged on the House the immediate necessity of resort ing to some measure by establishing poor laws in Ireland. Colonel DAVIES was of opinion that the adoption of the poor laws in Ireland would net have the effect of pre venting the inflect of Irish labourers into this country. It was the high price of lalmur in this conntly that tempted the poor hither. Mr. HUNT supported the prayer of the petitions. He uttributed all the distress of the labouring poor of Ireland to the high rate of taxation. Colonel SIBTHORPE thought that great exertions were beim-• made to keep up the distinction between the English and Irish labourers. He raw in the newspapers that in the county he had the honour of belonging to—(Linco'n shire) there was. an account of a brutal attack that had been made en the Irish labourers, three of whom had been most disgustingly assaulted ; now he had the Lincoln paper in his hand, and he was happy to say that there wa• not any par t of the statement founded in truth. After a few words from Mr. SADLER and Cod thy petitions were laid on the table, and ordered to b printed. SETTLEMENT OF THE POOR. Lord NIORPETH presented a petition from the church wardens. overseers, and inhabitants of Leeds, on the Hir ing by Service Bill lie wished to know whether the lion. Member (Mr. Weybind) intended to urge on his Bill upon the subject pending the present Session. Mr. WEYLAND said he intended by this Bill to pro mot. the interests of the agriculturists without interfering with the manufacturing interests If he found he had no chance of carrying the Bill in a few weeks he would with draw it, and afterwards introduce another measure. After a few words front Mr. ESTCOURT, the petition was laid on the table and ordered to he printed. ROMAN CATHOLIC MARRIAGES. Lord MOIIPETII next presented a petition from the churchwardens and overseers of the poor at Leeds, praying that marriages between Roman Catholics celebrated in this country, tnight he legalised.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. JONES presented two petitions in favour of the annual grant to the Kildare-street Society. . IMPROVEMENTS IN THE HOUSE. Colonel TRENCH brought forward the subject of en larging, ventilating, and otherwise improving the interim' of the House of Commons. He said the extreme heat and want of air when the House was fully attended by Members was generally admitted to arise from the bad construction of the House. Under these circumstances be had turned his attention to the memo of well airing and enlarging . the interior of the House without its being attended with any great expense. He consulted an archi tect, and found it could he done for about 3,0001, The Hon. Member gave a general outline of his plan which had been approved of 1)7 the Committee as a means not only of af fording better accommodation, hut of enabling Member., in every part of the House to hear more distinctly than at pm sent. Tie Hon. Member concluded by moving that two other Members be added to the Committee. Lord NIORPETH said that it wax expedient to refrain 1,-o m discussing this subject until the Committee nilde ti eir re?ort. To a question front an Mos. MimsEa, Colonel TRENCH said his plan would give incr . ca..-ed accommodation to strangers. Mr. HUNT agreed in the propo , ed plan. The two Members being added to the Committee, the subject was dropped for the present. Lord KILLEEN presentel a petition from certain Ho man Catholics against the Parlia , neutary grant to the Kd dare-street Society. Captain GORDON would take th it opportunity to set himself right with the House in reference to one of the most atrocious breaches of privilege and libels upon any Honourable Member he had ever heard of. It was not his intention to follow up his notice of the sub. ject by any specific motion; but he could not avoid a re ference to the subject in consistency with the duties he owed to himself, to the House, and to the puhlie. In a public print of the lowest and most scurrilous description (we do not mention its name, but it should attract unde served public notice), there was a reference to what he had said upon the subject of blasphemous and seditious and infamous publications on a former occasion in that Rouse. And after commenting upon it the writer concluded by asserting that he (Captain Gordon) who had com plained of the blasphemous publications, " the foster parent of those contribut,r to those lmblications a go-hetween the Tories, &e., a n d then rave two letters which were gross forger i e s, p ur p o rting to be addressed by bin; (Captain Gordon) to the editor of that low sod worthless penny publication. It had also designated Mr. Hunt (and I e would call the attention of that Hon. Member to the language) by several v er y opprobtmus epithets. Il e wou ld take a snore effecto sl me thod of justifying himself from those libel ous charges than by any motion on the subject. 11Ir. HUNT trould assure the Hon Member for Dundalk and the Honse, that I.e was quite regardless of what tile Press said about him—amt nineteen-twentieths of the people of the country were of the same. opinion—it WAS a proutulgayr of falsehoods. Whoever bad attended to the progress of the Reform Bill could not but be aware of that ; he had, therefore, become quite regardless of its 11-I,er• 1111111, It his Majesty's Minister', however, had ! et,o Fresent, he would have taken that opportunity of telling them bow nitwit blame aley 'kill incurred in having fallen 'older the dispteas'Are of the editor of the Times. Mr. R‘Jrt-IVEN deprecated any allusion to such prints is that to which the Hon. Member for Dundalk had called the attention of the House. It did not at all accomplish the object of Him. Members, while the attention of the public was thereby mile!? to 'Arat was alike disereditabre and injurimee, Ltd KILLEEN Also nuiVed for a return of the names of all stipendiary Magistrates in irela'nal, with the dates of their appointMent, the k-i.i . ines of the counties in which they 'erve, Sr';:if‘':i4,t the amount of their salaries and their other eantaauments, and the sources from which there payments were made. The Noble Lord also moved for t. ttf.irii of the amount of all superannuatiors to the consta • ul ry police in Irelane', Sir G. CLNIN 11-ought up the Bill for amouling the tornfOr'e?ftarls in Scotland. Mr. DICKSON said two clauses had been introduced in Committee, the principle and operation of which would be extremely injurious in respect to steam.carriiges ; and, therefore, he would object to its reception. Sir G CLERK said the clauses bad been introduced at the suggestion of Mr. 13crney, the inventor of steam carriages, arid the to'l It was quite equitable.— There was, indecd ) a Committee sitting of enquiry 'Tr the subject of steam carriages ; but they, how ever, had gone to such an extent with their in vestigations, that it might not he improper to wait f..r the result to which they might come. 11e would move that the Bill be reprinted for the ittformation of the House as to the newly inserted r.Ums, and that it should he re committed en .sriday next. Mr. DICKSON explained, and after some further obser eaaions Sir George Cleak's motion was agreed to. Sir G. CLERK, as Chairman of the Committee that had been appointed to try the pttition against the return of Mr. Stewart fir the ledburgh district of Royal Burghs, stated that; the Committee found that there had been gross disturbance in the burgh of Lauder, from which one .if the town councillors preferred a charge ;against one of the individuals connected with this outrage. The LORD ADVOCATE said indictments bad been preferred against four or rive individuals concerned in this 'ransaction ; their trials had been appointed for the 2d or 3d of this mouth, but iu consequence of the unavoidable absence of some persons they had been abdicated in order that Mr. Stewart's election might be secured. Sir G. CLERK intended to have brought it before the Rouse, but he had heard it was the intention of the Lord Advocate to institute a prosecution. He wished now to inquire of the Lord Advocate if the indictments had been postponed. The trials would be proceeded with, with all passible dispatch. Sir G. CLERK said, that under those circumstances, should refrain from pressing the subject upon the atten aion t,f the Ilouse. Sir R. MUSGRAVE presented teveral petitions relating to education in Ireland. Mr. SINCLAIR pre'ented a petition from the General S'yncifl of Sutherland, for the abolition of ahtvery in the West Indies. Mr. GILLON presented a peiition from the inhabitants of the royal burgh of Linlithgo.e, praying the House to pass the Reform Bill with as much despatch as tie forms of the House would permit. The SPEAKER, upon looking over the petition, asked • if the Hon. Member cool(' accvunt for the erasures in it? Mr. GILLON felt it his duty to add that there had bsen certain lines in the petition which he conceived to be of too strong a nature, and not being cognisant of the forms of the House, he had consulted another Hon. Members who inform him that it was not unparliamentary to strike out the lines.—(Loud laughter.) The SPEAKER slid the Hon. Member would, under those circumstance, perceive that it was not the petition of the parties. If it had been couched in proper language, it was the duly of the Hon. Member to pr sent it ; but it was not competent to him to alter the language, or erase any part of it. Mr. GILLON said as it could not now be called the petition of the parties he would withdraw it.—(Hear, hear.) At the same time he begged to state that from iris daily communication from various parts of Scot land, he kneW that very numerous petitions would be s e nt upon this subject. He stated this in order to remove the impression arising from the assertion that there was a lukewarmness in Scotland upon the Reform question.— That assertion only corresponded with the other assertion, that Ministers had adopted unconstitutional measures.— (Cries of " Hear, hear," and " Order.") They were wholly frivolous ; for he could state that the strongest feeling prevailed in the country upon this question. The SPEAKER interrupted the Hon. Member, oh serving that there was no question before the House. The petition was then withdrawn. Sir W. W. WYNNE presented a petition from the High sheriff and Grand Jury of the sonny of Denbigh, Against the use of molasses in distilleries, which the peti tioners said would be highly detrimental to the agricultu ral interests. _ . Orflured to lie on the table, awl to be referred to the Committee. Mr. CALVERT presented a petition from the msltstrrs of Ware to the same effect. CORN LAWS, Mr. HUNT bad three petitions to present for the re peal of the corn laws, but he scarcely knew whether he should present them, or not, until he bad ascertained whe the Noble Lord opposite would, or would not, object to their being received.—(Hear, bear, and laughter.) One of the petitions stated, that the petitioners were of opinion that it was high time to repeal an Act that disgraced the statute book—an Act called by those who suffered by it, " the Starvation Act"—politely called the Calm Bill—aßill passed at the point of the bayonet, ;n 1815, and which enabled the laudower to extort extravagant rents front the farmer. This, the Hoa. Member, thought was strong language, but not tyrannical. His own opinion was, that the Act; was moat unjust and inhuman. There was no doubt of its having been passed at the point of the bay onet, for when passed London was filled with military, and those who voted in its favour were escorted by soldiers to the Mouse. The petition was signed by three or four thousand of his constituent , , and he felt himself bound to present it. Sir R. INGLIS considered that the Hon. Member was doing his utmost to degrade the institutions of the country. No other inference could be drawn from his conduct in pre senting a petition like the present. He had introduced peti. tions into the House containing much more disgraceful dinguage than any Hon. Member who had ever sat in it, and he would ask the Noble Lord opposite, whether per mitting a petition now to be brought forward, stating that a certain Act hail been passed at the point of the bayonet, would be consulting the dignity of the House. Mr. CREEPS was of opinion, that presenting such a petition was highly objectionable. lie agreed with the Hon. Member for Oxlord, that it was time to notice petitions like that present, and to in:irk them with disapprobation. Had the Hon. Member been in the House when the Corn Bill was passed, - he would have known that it received every possible attention at every stage, a❑d that it was discussed almost as much as the Reortn Bill. Sir M. W. ItIDLEY thought the petition improperly and absurdly worded, but still not so disrespectfully as that the House ought to reject it. His object in rising was to call attention to the delay and inconvenience which must necessarily attend the presenting of such petitions, and :!elates taking place at this particular period. Lord ALTHORP did not object to the petition, but did not agree with the Honourable Member for Preston, that he had read the strongest part of the petition. The Noble Lot d read certain passages which complained of the inhumanity of the House, conjured it not to refuse to take their complaint into consideration, and avowing that the British lion was roused, and that the productive classes neither could nor would submit quietly longer to be treated as they had been. He would leave it to the House to say whether the petition ought to be received or not. Mr. HUNT said be should eettainly persist in present ing the petition ; he regretted that his colleague was not in the House to second it. If it fell to the ground in con sequence of there being no one to second it, it would not he his fault. An noir. MEMBER. (whose name:we could not learn,) felt it his duty to rise to second the motion, to bring up the petition. Mr. I'iIABERLY objected to the terms of the petition. lie did not mean to say the petitioners ought not to be beard if they had any cause of complaint, but then it was imperative that in approaching it they should use re spectful language. lie consi , lered the disrespect shewn to the House by the presenting of such petitions as tl is as resting not so much in the petitioners as in the lion. Members who took upon themselves to present such petitions ne cessarily knowing what language they coned The gallery was then cleared, when there appeared, That the petition be brought up— Ayes 6 On our re-admission to the t g i : e ill i q o y u s s s e •e ; t h o i t s ind, Noes Mr. CROKER addressing object he said was to ask certain explanations of the general course pursued by Ministers of late in that House. He could not postpone the motion he was about to make, under the eir eumsteati,tes of the case, to which be would refer, in justice , o the character of Alinisters of this country, or indeed the general representation of Europe. His object was such as involved no risk to the public interests, nor any objects ofgeneral policy. He would recall to the recollection of the House the circumstances that had lately occurred in a cer tain discussion in that Howe on the Mclgic onestion. The Howe avelld moth rt on tlo. bth bf August a question had lken r.at; :dative to the time when the letter was Coietn , :inlcated to his Noble Friend by the Dutch Ambassa dor. This country was much surprised by an announcement, that the Kiwi: of the Netherlands had entered the new kingdom of Belgium with an armed force, and an Hon. Batt. at the House on that day enluired of the Chancellor the Exchequer, t' - :hether it were true that the Dutch !coorS had thus hostilely entered the Belgian territory Now the Noble Lord stated in reply to the question whic!. had been put, that Government had received inform:ition from their Minister at The Hague, Sir C. Bagot, that or ders for the breaking of the armistice wire given, and he id no doubt it had been broken. Fairness, justice, the natural claims of humanity and courtesy of nation, secured to imply that Holland ought not to have taken so decided a step without announcing it to Ministers He had taken the liberty of asking it the Dutch authori ties had given notice to Goverowent. The Noble Lord had given him an answer, which was like all the answers he ever heard from him, full of propriety, prudence, and caution, that the reply to his question would lead into furthe rdetall than he felt himself prepared to go into. Awl if the matter had ended there, he should have been the last to compkin. LEFT SPEAKING.) HOUSE OF LORDS. The LORD CAANCELLOR did not take his seat on the Niroolsack till a Quarter past Five. - The Earl of ELDON presented a petition from Les keard, against the Church-building Bill. Mr. BERNAL and other Members of the House of Com mons, brought up the Disembodied Militia Bill, together with two private Bills. Lord TEYNHAM moved for the number of Magistrates dismissed from time Commission of the Peace in Ireland within the last four years. After a few words from Lotd PLUNKETT the mntiun was agreed to. DUBLIN COMMITTEE. The Marquis of LONDONDERRY, in consequence of the evidence before the House of Commons not being in a fit state to lay before the House, withdrew his motion upon this sulij•ct, of which he had given notice for to day. The Marquis of SALISBURY wished to know from the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether he was prepared in consequence of the information he had received to acquit the High Sheriff of Essex of any blame in the case of a convict of the name of S•erne who having received a reprieve was not informed of it for several days. Viscount MELBOURNE felt surprised at the question of the Noble Marquis, but if the statements he had re ceived were correct, he had no hesitation of acquitting him of all Warne. The House then Nytnt into Committee (Earl Shafte,e huly in the chair), when the Ecclesiastical Living's Bill was committed pro forma. FRAUDULENT CREDITORS' DILL. Lord WYNDFORD, in movin; the third reading - of the Fraudulent Creditor's Bill, repeated the observatiens which lie made on the subject on t'se second reading hie said that after an experience of forty years, he must say, that our laws between debtor and creditor were ex ceedingly defective. As they stood at present, after aereditor had got judgment, the debtor might go int) prison, and defy his creditor for any indefinite pe riod, and at the same time be in possession of three times the amount of his debts, as our laws gave no power over property such as money in the funds. or debts due by third parties to the debtor. For this he saw no remedy but bankruptcy to he declared against the parties as provided by his Bill. Another class of debtors against whom the present laws affhrded no remedy, were those who went abroad. To remedy that, he proposed that after 3 months' notice in the Gazette, and the practices not appearing th e y might be declared bankrupt and their property dis. tributed under those laws for the benefit of the creditors generally. (LEFT SITTING ) IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF COMMONS, Auausr 11. ( Continued from our Second Edition of yesterday.) Mr. STANLEY did not consider that any mea sure connected with hie Majesty's Government was involved in the printing of the petition, but. he ob jected to it on the ground of its stating that tie whole body of the yeomanry of Ireland were . waiting loran op portunity or pretext of murder to convey their regent merit against the Catholics of Ireland. lie considered that an expression to which the House ought not to give publicity. If however he found the general feeling of the House was in favour of printing the petition, after hav ing stated what be had done, he should not object to it, and would not press the House to a division. Mr. GRATTAN was in favour of the printing of the petition, and regretted that there were objections made to it by the Right Honourable Secretary fur Ireland. H e considered the calling out of this corps a most injudicious course, and one that had never been adopted by any Mi nistry in former times. It was, inhis opinion, an experiment fraught with danger, and one that ought never to have been tried. If the Right Hon. Secretary for Ireltnd Wished to stop the discussion of the question relative to the repeal of the Union, he must do it by constitutional means, or he should not have his support. [During this speech Riunmohun Roy was introduced be low the bar ; hi: appearance excited great curiosity.] Sir ROBERT INGLIS opposed the printing of the petition, considering the language of it actionable in a court of law. Mr.LAMBERT denied that there was any riot at New townbarry, and observed that if the prayer of the petition was not complied with, the mo,t lamentable results would fallow. fir did not mean to bring any charge against the Irish Government, but he did not think proper enquiry had been made as to the character and rank of the inili• viduals into whose hands arms had been put ; otherwise, he was sure that no arms would ever have been put into the hands of this regiment of yeomanry. Mr. BODKIN considered that if it were the wish of the Irish Government to ensure the peace of Ireland, the best way to begin it, would be to disarm this yeomanry corps. The Hon. Secretary for Ireland had said that this was one of the most loyal corps on earth, and he knew not on what foundation such a statement could have been made. Their loyalty had not been proved—their indiscretion had been demonstrated. Mr. STANLEY denied that he had ever used such an expression. He had said he would not allow any yeo manry corp., or any Orangemen, or any set of individuals, to lay claim to exclusive loyalty. Ile did recollect, on one occasion, in speaking of this corps, be hid said he (lid not think their loyalty was to be disputed, whatever be might think of their discretion. That was the utmost extent to which he had ever gone in their favour. Colonel PERCEVAL regretted the lOss of life that had taken place at Newtownbarry as much as any iudividual, but be certainly thought that thin yeomanry corps bad been unjustifiably aspersed. The Grand Jury had found bills of indictments for manslaughter against some of them, but - yet the individuals who called them selves aggrieved had not thought fit to prosecute for the minor offence. Here then was much serious ground of complaint against the yeomanry. In the province to which he was attached there were only three regiments, while in the provinces from which some of the gentlemen opposite came, and who had exclaimed so much against these men, there were not less than fif teen regiments of the line. Mr. BLAKENEY said the yeomanry of Carlow were composed of as bad a description of persons as any that could be found, and that was the corps that so gloriously distinguished itself at Newtownbarry. One of them, when a prisoner, was brought before him, in his character of a Magistrate; that person was dressed in a ragged frieze coat, and did not appear to be more than Hi years of age. He would like to know who made such a youth as that one of the corps of yeomanry? The lion. Member was proceeding to describe other corps, but was interrupted by cries of " Oh !" and murmurs. He, however, persisted amidst much noise, to state that of one corps of sixty men, many of them whom he named were sheep-stealers, pick-pockets, and persona guilty of other crimes.—(Loud cries of " Order 1") Sir R. INGLIS rose to order. He said if the proceed ings of that House were confined within its own wails he would not object to the statement of the Hon. Member; but as there were means by which those pro ceedings became known to the public, he submitted whe ther the lion. Member ought to attach crime 'to persons who were not present, and could not defend themselves? Mr. BLAKENEY proceeded to state that the people of Ireland had been in a state of rebellion, and that had it not been for the exertions of the Roman Catholic clergy that country would net he in a state of war. Lord KILLEEN maid that he belonged to a county where there were but few yeomanry, and those he always found extremely well conducted. He put it to the House whether this question had not now been proti acted long enough.—(Cries of " Hear, he )r, heir.") Ile wished now to put a question to the Right Ilon. Gentleman (Mr. Stanley). About three weeks ago he heard the Right lion. Gentleman say, that the delivery of arms to the yo manry was then suspended. Since that period he had seen from the neWsp 'pets, that arms bad been distributed in sonic particularly in Wexford, and he found also from the Dublin Gazette that on the 2d of August yeo manry bail been appointed. lie wisliel to whether this was true, and also whether it was the intention of Government to increase the yeomanry force? Mr. STANLEY said it was the intention ofGavernment to suspend, for the present, the issuing of arms, and all that bad been issued since, the orders were given had not been issued by the Government, bet by the Commanders of the different corps to the men, having been previously issued by the Government to the Commander. With regard to the other put of the question, he could state that it was sot the in'ention of Government at present to increase the yromaary force. It was true that within 3 shot t time vacancies had occurred in some yeomanry corps which hail been filled up. Mr. WY SE would only refer to the presence and effi • cieney of the regular mili - ary at Waterford and Clare elections, where it was proved that they had done more to preserve peace i , y kind words than the y eornanry by their bayonets. Let Ministers hearken to the adviee of their red friends, not from this or that s.,ction of the county, but throughout Ireland, and then they should nut need to tremble for its faithful allegiance to England, but England and Ireland, firmly united, would be one in reality as well as in name—a blessing which was, how ever, only to be obtained by equal justice being impartially distributed.—(Cheers.) Mr. LEFROY protested against the waste of time, ob serving the question was not touching the existence of the yeomanry, but about the printing of a petition. Mr. WALKER inveighed against the yeomanry as a fuce undisciplined and dangerous.—The petition was or dered to be laid upon the table. Sir RICHARD MUSGRAVE then moved that the pe tition he printed. Mr. STANLEY had before stated the grounds on which he haul funned his opini , n with respect to this petiticn. lie should certainly object to the printing of it, but he did not think it of safficient importance to divide the House upon the question. Mr. CRESSET PELHAM said, that the petition re ferred to a subject which was under consideration in ano ther quarter. After a few words from Sir G. WARKENnmit, Mr. O'CONNELL hoped that the House would not be divided upon the subject of this petition. If the Hon. Member knew the p: cent state of Ireland he would not object the printing of the stat,ments in this petition. If it teas not printed, it would turn the Irish from hope into despair, and instead of three or four petitions, the table would be covered with thousands. It was his anxious desire that the people of Ireland should look to that House alone for redress. The matter was of no trivial importance. Sir GEORGE MURRAY should certainly oppose the printing of this petition. Fnim the lung experience he had had of the yeomanry, he dal not believe that they de served such imputations as he found contained in a part of this petition. That petition declared that there existed in the minds of the yeomanry towards the fright Catholics, "sentiments of bitter and inveterate hostility, which were always ready to manifest thermelves, and which Feiz up a petty tumult as a pretext for murder." He repeatet his objections to such language. Lord ALTHORP said, that the words in which the subject of the petition was conveyed to the House, as well as the nature of the petition itself, placed the Government in a difficult position. It was perhaps, true that the print ing of the petition would be likely to produce irritating feelings among sonic classes of people in Ireland, and it certainly ought to he the wish of every 11Ieml•er of that House to do what he could to soothe the feelings of the different parfes there.—(Hear, hear.) If they were to print the petition, they should be the means of giving publication to the sentence which they had just beau! read ; and if they were to refuse to print the petition, they should be irritating the feelings of the people already enough excited by the affair at Newtownbarry. Seeing the difficulty by which they were met on either hand, he should certainly wish to avoid taking a distinct course either way. He should, therefore, suggest to the Hon. Gentleman the propriety of withdrawing his motion.— (Hear, hear, liesr.)—lf he were obliged to give his vote on the question of printing this petition or no., he should take what he considered at hest but as a balance of evils. Atter the petition had been presentees—after it bad been received by the House and ordered to lie on the table, he must say that he frit very unwilling to say that it should not be printed ; but still he thought he should be right in saying, that there would be a less chance of creating irri tation in saying that it should not than in swing that it should be printed ; and if, therefore, the question was put to the vote, he should certainly oppose the printing. But he must repeat, that he should regret the necessity of giving a vote on the subject. Lord DUNCANNON should certainly vote in favour of the motion. Mr. HUNT was also in favour of printing a petition which contained so serious a cause of complaint as this. Mr. SHELL said the question was, whether the House would irritate a class of yeomanry, or offend the people o f Ireland ? Who were the authorities on one side and on the other ? First, there was the lion. Baronet, the Mem ber for Waterford, a m in of high character, and a gentle man whose opinion was of importance. Opposed to him was the Right Hon. Secretary Ix Ireland, a gentleman of first-rate Parliamentary reputation, but who could not possibly be equal to the Hon. Baronet in his knowledge of the feelings of the Irish people. Then came the Member far Dundalk—he gave utterance to that Hon. Member's name—he thought it would not be necessary to add a comment.—(A laugh.) Then came the lion. Members for Donegal and Enniskillen ; and lastly, there was the Noble Lorl the Member for the county of Kilkenny—a gentleman who, if not actually a part of the Government, was s o linked with them as to be considered a portion of the Government. What did I e say? Why, that the petition ought to be printed—that the Government should, in fact, learn how to steer the vessel of the State in a different course, and raise their eye to a better and more fixed star than they had hitherto taken as their guide. Under these circumstances, where was the choice of authority? Was it not greater in favour of printing the petition than against it ? lie asked the question of the Government, and he put it as a single Irish Member— who had coincided with them in thinking that this peti tion ought not to be printed ? The gentlemen on the other side of the House. He warned the Government not to be induced to accept their alliance, What, would the Government select them in preference to their friends? Ile warned them not to do urged them to reply to their new " Your praise is censure, and your censure praise." Their new supporters would embrace them, but to hug them to death. lie called on them in the name of Ireland, and of the Irish people, not to be afraid of offending the yeomanry, for they were enrolled together in bands that were •in no danger of separating. Let them not fear to offend the yeomanry, but with respect to the Irish people—he bad done . , he would only repeat that there were eight millions of agitated and strongly exasperated men. On these men the greatest blessing had been lately conferred, and he called on the Government not to mar the effects of that Phasing by their conduct at this moment. Mr. BRISCOE thought, that before the House could c ome to a proper vote on this subject, the petition ought to be read. They had heard what would be the consequence of refusing to print the petition, and he thought they had heard enough to induce them to pause before they deter mined on rejecting the motion. Captain GORDON must be allowed to tell the lion. Member opposite that no inan in that House should with impunity make assertions that reflected, or appeared to reflect, upon him. No man there should with impunity titter a sneer which seemed to impeach his conduct, or c l as s him with those whose opinions were unworthy of c onfidence. The Hon. Member, he repeated, should not with impunity express a charge against him by inuendo. li e would nut suffer such language to pass without the rebuke it deserved as unparliamentary, as that which in a society of gentlemen ought not to be used. The SPEAKER called the lion. Member's attention to the concluding part of the sentence he had just uttered. The Han. Member h id alluded to something, which he .aid was an insinuation or inuendo employed by another lion. Member, by stopping short in his speech ; and the Mernb:r had, in alluding to that inuendo, filled up the blank in a manner which would have been unparlia. mentary, and would have deserved the character he had bestowed upon it had he been infallible in his judgment. Captain GORDON had understood the purpose of the Hon. Member to be what he had deacribed it. The Hon. Member had said that it was sufficient to mention the name of the Member for Dundalk, and he construed that observation with the other part of the sentence, to mean something which he had DO hesitation in saving was not usual in the phraseology o f gen tl e men. Sir R. PEEL regretted the importance, the undue im portance, which had been given to the printing of this pe tition.—(He,r ) He regretted, too, the anode in which the Hon. Member for Louth hail thought fit to address the House. When he recollected the speech which that lion Member had made last Session on the question of Reform, and the dcsite he then expressed (and no doubt very sin e rely), that all distinctions founded upon religious diffe rences should be for ever abolished, it was with pain that he (Sir R. Peel) heard the Hon. Member arroga'e to one l•-etirular class in Ireland the name of the Irish nation. to the rkelusion of that other, and that important, though loss numerous caws, the Protestants of Ireland. Ile had before opposed the printing of a petition which coat re flections upon his Catholic fellow-subjects, and on the same ground he should now concur with those who de termined to refuse the printing of this petition, which east indiscriminate and groundless reflections on a large_ body of e Irish people. Did the Noble Lord (the Member for Meath), who had three yeomanry carps in his county, of whose conduct he had spoken in the highest to ms of praise—did he desire to give currency to such charges a. were contained in this petition? It was hardly possible to believe that he cou•d entertain such a wi.h. On these grounds, therefore, and on the ground that legal pro ceedings were either still pending, or were now likely to he commenced, with respect to the matter which was the subject of this petition, he should oppose tae motion for printing it. Mr. SHEIL, in explanation, said that the 11:glot lion. Baronet, with much courtesy, had al!uded to a speech of his, expressive of his wish for the abolition of all diffe rences founded upon religious distinctions, and load ac ens 'd him of having, in the present instance, departed from the precept he then laid down. The Right Hon. Baronet was mistaken in making this charge ; for he (Mr. Shell) well knew the diffo'renee between the people of the Noah of Ireland and a particular class of Irish yeomanry, and ha was most anxious to make a distinction between thews. Now that be was upon his legs, he wished to say something in the, way of explanation to another Hun. Member. He had never intended to say anything that could give offence to the Honourable Membo r for Dun dalk, and he was most anxious to remove the impres sion of offence from the mind of that Hon. Member. The pause in the middle of the sentence of which the lion. Member complained, was mole for the purpose of preserving himself from saying that which might, perhaps, have been offensive.—(A laugh.) He wound now state what that was. —(A laugh.) It was this—that in lois judg ment, a gentleman is-ho, since he had been in Parliament, had evinced feelings so strong on this subject, showing no unsoundness of heart, but a pronene-s to a particular class of opinions, had, by so dicing, taken away from his opi nions the value of authority upon Irish questions. lie mu-t now observe, that it was aon itt,r of astonishment to him that a gentleman who was so strenuous in Christian orthodoxy should permit such a slight matter so to have ruffled his temper. If, however, he had inflicted a wound oro the How. Member's feelings Le was anxious to say that he had done so unintentionally, and he regretted it. Lord KILLEEN said that he thought the matter of this petition would be as much puhl . shed by the discussio❑ that had taken place as it would be if the House were too print it. Captain GORDON said the explanation of the lion. Gentleman opposite was entirely satisf,crory to him. Di'- fering, as they did, upon political subjects, and esp,cially upon Irish questions, he entertained a high opinion of the lion. Gentleman's talents ; and he w•as happy to find that the remarks had proc,•eded from a difference of opinion only, and was not occasioned by a feeling of a more deeply seared nature. Mr. GRATTAN said that the Howe might print the petition, without being supposed to be bound by the state ments contained in it. He should support the motion. Mr. D. W. HARVEY wished to kuow, before he gave his vote on this subject, whether proceedings relative to this affair were still pending; or whether it was. still in tended to bring this matter to a legal inquiry ? As he was answered upon that question, he should give his vote for or against the printing of the petition. He waited in the most confident hope, having the fullest reliance on the resent Government, that they intended to institute, if they had not already instituted proceedings which would satisfy the justice of the country.—(Much cheering.) He trusted, however, that justice would never b.: so strippel of her sacred elements, as to he placed under the slavery of popular opinion.—(Cheers.) He had no doubt that Mi nisters were most anxious to communicate British blessings to all p irts of the British Empire, but they could not remedy in Ireland by a single Statute, the misgovern. ment of centuries. Mr. STANLEY only rose aga'n to answer a question directly put to him. The bills which had betn sent up to the Grand Jury had all been ignored, and the parties who had sent them up declined afterwards to present any ill s for manslaughter. Th e hills which the Crown bad or dered to be prepares! for manslaughter had also been ignored, with one exception, and when that came on for trial, nine of the witnesses were in attendance. Five or six other persons had been hell to bail until the next As siz when it teas a`•so the intention of the Ctown to pro ceed against the policeman. The relations of the de ceased persons had it in their power to present bills for murder before a different Grand Jury, but they had nut availed themselves of the opportunity. Upon this subject, without a violation of private confidence, he might read a passage from a letter he had received twit days since front the Lord Lieutenant o! Teel mil, which stated 01.3 his Ex celtency " had directed a letter to be written to the Jus tices of the county of Wexford, to condemn the late pro ceeding as far as related to the calling out of the yeomanry, and to account for the expre'sion of no opinion and the adoption of no measures on the ground that the matter was still the subject of legal investigation."—( Hear, hear.) On these grounds he bored that the House wou'd not think it necessary that the petition should he printed. Mr. O'CONNELL referred to the proceedings instituted by Mr. Foscolo, the solicitor to the parties, and to the ad vice he had given ; and added that he believed the police m•an to be a Roman Catholic. At present no legal in vestigation was pi nding, and any man who was guilty might go where he pleased. He trusted that !he lion. Baronet would press the question to a division, to show the people of Ireland that they had at least a few friends in the House of Commons. The ATTORNEY-GENERAT, was confident not only that the people of Leland had a few friends in th.• of Commons, but that ell its Members were the friends of Ireland.—(Cheers from all sides.) Under a strong feeling and a firm conviction of duty he put it to the House whether it was possible to do any thing more likely to keep alive animosity in Ireland than to represent it a, de pending on the printing of a petition like the present.— (Hear, hear.) Ministers were anxious that the petition should not be printed, because the promulgation of such language was of itself a premium upon agitation. They could have no wish but to preserve a compose I course, and to do their utmost to allay existing animosities ; and they were bound to say that they would not be parties to an act of injustice—that they would not lend themselves to the circulation of a mo , t cruel reflection upon a loge body of men, charged with feelings that could in no way be fairly imputed to them. Those who voted for the peti tion would afford some soiidence that they accorded in the sentiments it expressed. . . Mr. HUMS denied the. it was fair to infer that tilos., who voted for printing the petition accorded in its senti ments. The fact was, that seventeen fellow.subjecte had been massacri d—had been murdered.—(lliac, heir.) He repeated, th it they hid been muniered, Rot only without law, but contrary to all law—no Riot Act having been read, and no order by a superior officer given. In Ireland an unavailing appeal had been made for justice ; the un fortun ite people now called upon Parliament to do them r ight, and was it fit that a British House of Commons should reject such a claim, because it teas accompanied by a few unmeasured expressions?—(Cheers.) He could not concur in the sweeping charge against the whole body of the yeomanry of Ireland, but it was not just or wise on this account to refuse to pint the petition, when that re fusal would lead to the most unfavourable inferences in Ireland. Justice, and justice only, could allay the angty feelings of the people of Ireland. Mr. CRAMPTON agreed that the printing of the pe tition might prejudice the administration of that justice for which the lion. Member for Middlesex contended. Al though the parties might not choose to go further, Govern ment was bound to sift the matter to the bottom, and to inquire into the conduct of the yeomanry charged with these discreditable acts. The House then divided— For the printing of the petition Against it `23ti Majority —l62 CORN LAWS. Oo our re•admieeion we found Mr. AUNT on his legs, postponing until a future day his motion on tie Corn Laws. We could not catch the date he named, but he hoped by that time the Reform Bill would be c.it•rie.l. BELGIUM. Lord PALMERSTONrequested the Hon. Baronet (Sir R. Vyvyan) to postpone until a future day his mo ti on respecting Belzium. Minister s had received accounts to day, that orders had been sent front the Hagu e f ur t h e return of the Dutch tr oo p s to their own frontiers._ (Hear.) Negociations had, ttiereinre, been resumed. Ile merely submitted whether public convenience, under the circumstances, did not require that discussion should he deferred, independent of . any advantage the lion. Baron e t might think would be gamed by his motion Sir 11. VYVYAN—Before he answered the quest'on the Noble Lord, he begged to ask, whether if tlv! Dutch troops retired, the French troops would retire also Lord PALMERSTON—It would l)e evident, from what lie had said on a former occasion, that such were ihe assurances of the French Government. Sir 11. VYVYAN added, that such poatponemattsWe r t e , at all times disagreeable, and he had alr e ady deferred P more than ones.. After the discussion in an ether p l l led after the information thtt negoelatione were rene' r in consequence of the order of the King of the is-eihett lands that his troops should withdraw within the Da ci frontiers, he felt that it might be inconvenient to deb ° the sultjta,t, and tin refore was ready to defer his motion' The position, also, of the French troops, and the lor that they would be ordered try their Government to I' o l front Belgium, was another reason for such a course; ea within a week news might be obtained whether t°' Ministers at Paris had adhered to their promisee , would only consent to pa.tpone his motion to this d', l week, when he expected that the .Noble Lord would br possession of satisfactory intelligence upon this point. Lord STORMONT remarked, that on a formrr he had given way upon this subject to his Hon. Frie s , (S.r R. Vyvyan) ; but that as his Hon. Friend had and •hotteht fit to defer his motion for a week, he ( 1 ,., Stormont) gave notice that he weerld to-morrow raove I° ' some papers relative to Belgium. Mr. CHOKER said, that but for the notice of the lit Baron, t, he should hinesell, ere now, have ripened the 0 ' j ct on one point which seeme 1 tin him of such urgent cessity, that it ought perhaps to he discussed this of night. Lest any accident should arise to-morrow tin I° . vent the Noble Lord from moving for tire papers he 1 noires!, he (Mr. Croker) gave notice that he would at events to-morrow, bring before the House a part of ti" sue ject of a nature so urgent, that he deferred it IT h luetzusce even for twenty-four hours. In the meanwin'''; be b ggel to ask tine Noble Lard opposite, at what 0; ire becime acquainted with the letter of the 2,1 Augur from tine Minister of Foreign Affairs of Holland. Lord PALMERSTON—That letter a .'dressed to tbe Ministers of tire Five Powers was put into ow hands () Wednesday at. about twelve o'clock, by the Minister, tPb had arrived sal the night preceding . . 1 read it at the Or' ference on Thursdity, the earliest period at which we ice f enabled to meet. Mr. CHOKER—The Noble Lord certainly ought 1 ! know his own business best ; but I apprehend that hel refit ring to tire letter of the Ist August, and not to tlo of the 2d August, to which my question applies. Lord PALMERSTON—I shall be the better able 14 anstt er if the Rig:rt Hon. Gentleman will inform me vt r b s, the letter is about. Mr. CHOKER—I find the letter in the ordinary chap' t nets of information, and it is a circular, written by h Mini-ter for Foreign Affairs of Holland to the Atnba gsr dors of the Powers, referring to the dispatch of the c l3 l h,fore, of which the Noble Lord has already spoken]. read it in a well-known Journal of this city—the Time' which, in its leading article, makes an observation vP,'"l. , it. I was obliged to enter into that e xpl a n a tion iu or rid to point the attention of the Noble Lord to the lette r the 2d of August, and not of the let of August. y Lord PALMERSTON—That letter was read to 11;1., Noble Friend at the head of the Cover mnunt and neb e in a very Hurried manner, by one o f th e Mi n isters of ► i t $. Netherlard-, on a subs e qu e nt d a y ; h u t wh e th e r o n or Monr. Satu CH OrdaKEßy, 1 amadded not , nowthat -,,li tenwas a ared to sa matter of gy. rej l , t j g importance, and he begged that the Noble Lord woub t ', o able to state to-morrow whether it had been read to en Fi inlay or us Saturday. tt i S-r R. VYVYAN said, that he had n e ver total' d take the question mat of the hands of the Noble Lord; his real reason for postponing it was, that under the tered circumstances discussion might be inexpedient s ue inconvenient. He begg e d hi s N o bl e F r i en d (L o rd S e t , !unlit) only to wait until Thursday next, and if satil l e tory news did not arrive by that day, he would O il, ' bring on the subject or relinquish it no his Noble Frien.eo, Lord STORMONT said, that in his opinion the B ° l sl did not admit of delay, and he should therefore Efri's forward to-morrow. The Marquis of CHANDOS asked, whether Mioi' tell i had tidings of the entrance of the French troops into 5 1° 0 , Lord PALMERSTON replied, that there was reason believe that they had reached that place. RIOT AT BOLTON. Mr. HUNT asked whether Ministers had received l, particulars of some disturbances at Bolton, during W c the soldiers were celled in, although, for the sake of P 6l they were afterwards removed. o tr Mr. G. LAMB answered, that information on the ject had reached the Horne-office; but that, in constqu e : g i of the absence of the Magistrates at the Assizes, it was ample as that which would be transmitted hereafter. An 110 N. MEMBER, whose name we did not ascerts',;4l was desirous to ask the Noble Secretary for Foreign AO, I whether it was true that the French were actually in °l' litary occupation of the town and citadel of Mons ? Lord PALMERSTON was sure that the House 1 see the inconvenience et that system of interrogation. was ready to answer questions put to him, when theY ti Lited to anything upon which it was necessary to in fij the House of the policy of the Government ; but su rel ,, the lion. Gentleman expected that Members of the verument, attending to their duties as Members of tP: House, should he made to answer the purposes of a n e • paper for foreign intelligence, the House would not dep t such an expectation to be rcali,ed.—(Hear.) • ar ° The saute Hoy. MEMBER who had put the pestle gretted to observe that there was a di.position on th e of his MLjesty's Ministers to bide any part of their fore' poi icy. —( Hear.) Sir JOHN WROTTESLEY objected to the itnlll tion which the Hon. Gentleman opposite meant t° npan his Majesty's Ministers. Lord PALMERSTON had alre tdy given an gn i respecting the occurrences to which the lion. Ale n opposite just now again irater rogated him ; but as he see hp not to have been understood, he would repeat ti! 3 Ji Majesty's Government h•td Paten informed of the arriP' the Fr, nch troops at Mons. Lord ELLIOT wished to ask the Noble Lord an° tv i;l question.—(Cries of " hear, hear, and order.") V izi :l?? true, that sultsequently ncommunication with Ili country on the subject of th e as s i s t an c e which Beig l e ol was to receive from France, the King of the Belgians e to retract his application for aid at the Court o f and to request that the French troops might not nO r‘ t e and that the King of tbe Frcnch replied that the la4S l i quest came too late, and that the troops must protec' (Loud cries of ‘- order soil hear.") • 0 1 Lord PALNIERSTON com pl a i ne d th a t his 111 1 l e •,( -Ministers acre called upon not only to give accurateeo,! forma•ion front day to day as to what their own 0 ,1 0 ,61 ment was tiring, but as to what other Governtnents doing.—(Hear.) f f 1 , Mr. CHOKER had thought that h e should deal head r with the Noble Lord, had h e ( w ith ou t g i v i ng the r ie Lord notice of his intention) availA himself of the P h il 1 of a Member of that Hous e , t o b r i ng an y su bject''s b e mi g ht thi n k t o b e o f pu bli c i mportance before the.o sideration of Parliament. Al t h oug h th e caseupon " f he was desirous of intormation was extremely urgent?, he would not bring it on without previous notice. After a short c:anyersation across the table, Lord k,'"ll was understood to sly that he should not then pr' s9 • 1 Noble Lord for an answer. UNDER-SHERIFF OF HEitTFORDSHIq • _.4 Mr. T. DUNCOMBE moved for the prod , depositions and other documents, relating to of the Under-Sheriff of Hertfordshire, in neglectii timely inform aion of a reprieve which had mitte . d to him for a convict named Stern, und , of death in Hereford gaol. He consideyl th, which required the attention of the Hour. H the conduct of the Under-Sheriff, and hope,/ officers would be taught that they must not trl feelings of 10(91 in the situation of Stern.—(ll , Sir H. HARDINGE seconded the motion, views very contrary to those of the Hon. Membe IT.). He was convinced that the papers tuovt i., the correspondence of the Sheriff with the pattment, and the depositions of the Under• gaoler—would clear up any doubts as to the t the conduct of the Under-Sheriti.--(Hear. ) stahees of the case *ere the-e :—Stern had bee. upon whit appeared to be v, ry conclusive evid, in consequence of representations which were Under-Sheriff, be instituted an inquiry, by Wh, stances favourable to the convict were brougl and having bud depositions taken, he forwar , his own expense, by his confidential clerk, to Gaselee, who was then at Chehnsford, whefe were being held. Having laid the deposition Mr. Nicholson's clerk obtained a respite•; he iminedia - cly hastened hack. But, instead once to the house of his master (V e Under ',topped at the gaol upon his Way, front feelini nity, in order to make known to the unfortun what had occurred in his favour. The gaoler son, was ht the time confined to bed by illuesgt not be seen, but the clerk requested the under -g quaint Mr. Wilson, as soon as possible, ?bat had been obtained. In calling at the gaol 07 home, to give that information, the clerk h' taken what would appear to be the best meant relieving the anxiety of the unfortunate o" ) could net leave the rerpite for the inspection of, H.! was o‘oliged to tike it to the Under-SW° and not to the gaol r, it w.ts Det'r. , 4: 4 ary a.; his a staying the execution. Now, in all that: th, i n o tt t t h ie. e .rikuzlni, e ,,,i p,i flla ci ,,,,,,_ s ile i h t dt ' . i l. o ii , ( t ) Hu i )', ttet cd hum ei ej as m h ros before the u ft c o: o v f hu manity, t _ ti c rl.r great It ai rl,l,ln.expelice it wo r in g of w . e. Wont at t h tur t ,k e , . e gi ing, tt } having i to ster ie . latter the de pos7( Fie t i h at St ern ( i ::, , ; I::„ Fniu g• If t] . rais e d by stated that th e ofti. tin, i a,,,, i n respite w correct a g i r• b Ltnes s of th eb ecole th e , ( nt pet so th e ` i tti r kr -.Sherii t! Ind of the ' t Scer lap er ,.,amet‘t a filutitv,itt o c4l:t.t o l fohi l fit l' to ' r: r tn 4 o r riitatrtr i .4 A heic l' gv ad t de l l ' e s t x,:tnt M' l :' : 4 . yff, : , n_ r f - Irt n ' t ° t - t, e oal l ol uC i rtt 't t ' io n iei a a oi li ni( j e: ° suilt i b , Y e l iAg n ,i n 4 ( ' E l: ), s ,,: i .i alei ( e. i , ' h i r '3 t.sc f a t i r ‘f . ' ta ° i n i t t:i t3 e niN ' i l itit t a ll e t tc l l l l l l ( l ei; a el * Ile (M 4 4 Pl ' i n ~i- Flo t ell ' t gainat the I 44 atenintounicat a pt t ention to t ~.rp.art of the o tort Iltil cip l , Tier wi hav e itne r ' . 'spite (11 s ent to the btcp l' „ . ) He (31; s tAl " Itu le• But , lia ' ,l not oppo , e 1 44, t ead, it ar ,\t,ttliitti ll iii4liiri;v.itiv A cik,ttelei, n i. 7 4 .4tt i ti:ll: 4l tile t ,teloo i rur‘ t' i. ) elisi‘ii n n Nenti.sl t urie l .,l3: ; “ri : :hs,Ea. t l,o,,d t it.ii, 11 ) t been by t.' tih t t , made I] 1) 444 that th e Uri, t iff h,, rl t3' of the a kl t , - .' great infl 064:"--(Flear.) ',iyJt t v ery large I AI, ‘ l 'itli som e c tett! ' I 'lleth " 1,4t{: : 1,1 r1; t 4 4. ti 'l : 4 il. 444 ltt l i ::' ,111110 r P e l‘ vt 4 lt rr i: ariv t i s, tl 4 e : ei i) , l 4 t, f1 1 , , ° ,1 ::- ` f,h t i . o :P t ri el F 4 e)it a tt e e,e s , l e t . S a n r ti a i : ffi u n t ifg t ( ea :l i c: .a a rdia r n hd'ul io t aid ' ir • eon la i l v i e r'i t sr d if i a t - r s : ii " C la ") prefer t , t lti e of ,l a tin' ty I . I t, he can 1 ' th '''le3 ) distan .. ,„4 „. '1 Were upo 'I th e 41 (-1 therefor, 1, at •, I , of th e , act. Rev. 'li ' v 'ew of th, , r I d. „. , 1, 11 11i, n. t I tARDI ie tv'eoulaefter his H 34 . ~t, g i ve no of r(111!1 t l ilt II I k °41..:111 1 '.111)4 ' 14 v, t( 1 i lliu' i t tj'ill4a r hri e, tetit'k i t 4.°.th l .:l n. u4's r ) i dius '‘ H ikfa s ''re"iet.:44;sal-lin .a r•'e l liii., o ll ; fachc:f il i m : :et Ul ; Yi ; :1: : hlt J A B e e:L) i ll nib:le o ' .7'olNiß ß ai f ;: n 4 t eYjCvb i til PCDo- rider-Sheriff irKrn° t : ji s e l li o i l ' having i ' : i q l.,ttt l i ' izti l 0.. t .4 h lithe motionir teLi,if fro td 1 the conduct Af t Ir n• toi al itTy, the ti 44 C "el EVANS to te notice, r t that tile House 1 1; ' ip ,P'Y to a fines i k t i 4 lr e il, —° , l4l, x oar . t 5 that coun 4, 1 . 1 11 e 1 114,4 Committer of ht Q "Mmittet fL iIAIIINIAt 'tit ‘verith, , ' ` Itt ! ,i i clause, it t t 'e4 . a Schedul e ! 1 , 4 ') th; and that e k 'kt e e, ectione 1 'lr D t ° l lnty. a l it)ti '°l - 1 1 , 11URI . '' , l:l, l' '' was ver3 ~t l4 l„t ' s tt e (Lord ,", \ `fi r „,,` i n Which tie' o 4 l , l " I Pon the I 1 0 w t 'itee have kh• hat t I,h Manner de ?the procei 4 t tcl J ht '4 iri 011 N RU IN,44'nt of ikkiti 6 , t 'llt a' • u ii e ,ebi tt nic hi ce r • rea e h, g (loo : o (l) l, ‘ l v c: r t, :e tib, .., t ri o, ,: ', 4, : li k r I : 1 4 1 ', t 4 t i : i t ta '''": 1 t Y , 0 1 I .0 44 : , , i v ti on il a r Is ( i' I .. r '•' n' . I i 4 s i 1 u°, into i n t n n t ) ds f od na e t t r ‘ a h l' se e er t )13A,•-.- , ~:._, pan of . oductio9„o t x, Poiruli e 0 j it, 4,4 4 )z e d bo he c , " ~,t 1 , net, With tin li e eensoktiNl, therefore, iyi I.:i l ef:aer t b. l vv ;: i t t: : :: ; 4l: l, ll4l;t i tittli t :: : : :: tithenr,teonbrodytn,d.:t: ber Pr P 1 1 , 1 , 4. the po, red fell ll l.' tt ver„ t . e 1-100doe,14:11:;,%taid lon, o f r-She l° c ' pro prie t i o ,t, I,l' 4 t 'r E. Su, : i f): c ce i i re • i7c. , t , t , 4 k 4ti t) . l4 B : : E er L y, l e knee ;,td, Pk, 4 aid , r .' , tanoe 0 iiri °ViZtili ,if the Ott t 0 t, t ,0 1,t . 0 , C dell tbe',o 4 ti ) , l 1 4 ' two i 31r. J 1 ), ;, tll klc: lt Y. n 4. of the e the s i LC, tll t , ) t shoal 0 b e for e t , 1 1.,",,til , " I ?i ,, ions 1 . with sr i s° t :l l ) ( trlb ers . l ' of g". i :l I" ;St )4 hti N ° ll 6ery • Shern":/,;( kt.Ntt e s, t Of 0 V 'tl tr "e I n ,gpi 0- . ° 4O!, '4\ tt,, for (n. " the 0 at , i ll vili, rya'lqiil th e re 1, M r. c oi l L tti l °l3 l(i ' v s lte, a gre r , and to ~,( ' h ‘ta,,,tiv,„" cut of ga' ler e 1, 1 4 1, It t l i ", its -- to that t the r 4' i • b Il i t i ' L ' i 'itig a 0 , 1) i g o iiNk u ttl, ,ts l , "e Nobit o d ccr O ,IP N!kk i jx).,?/' and ,of 'l le ) 11 , t it.,' t Ilt ) i",, I 'll we c ;o nvi ct ; d' fl g i 'Ni',ll e r ,* ~, f th e ' ' ,lo'`li l' 'Y f s'-"EN T to " lAt i ' H il t r I. l'rti, it T, i i ( 1,1 t he 1,.. . a deli ~ t , t l ' ° ' ' ' 'O f ''t ' l er g any he etrls r tz , si -1 of the :he