The Sun. — London, England, 1834-02-12 00:00:00

,: - • . .N., .HluF, oF sT ,, cns TH ; C ttAY Al' ONg A' ' "nSt( -..-- : Ape, ' " ................. --- , New 5 per Cent. „, a Cent. lied. ........... 89% a:, India Stock O'CLOCK. -- 'airog 29 pm• ,r Cent. Cons. ............ 995 4 % i I:fit to Bonds 10174 Cent. .................. South :7:ea Stock 'll, ~„...Red.. .. ~.. ............. 9774 8 (Old An:wide. , — ~,g;;;),,% Per Cent. ......... 97 kt, New Ditto ••• •• 4., e ; •,,ent Ann. 172 h. _3 per Cent. Ann. 1751 ~ . ..4 7— , ,t ::R..-_, --- k i .' ss t. 1826 ..... 103% •, 2 ' 14 :' Ex. Bills, X 1,00 050 0 1 ' - j slt -0 4 Ann. to .X. 103% Ditto....' ''',' • O t t 1 /5 „,) 1 ,8 111.- ......... 17U 5-16 Ditto: Small . •. • —, , 559 .. 'Ditto Commercial lan c 44: 89 4_ 4 7 7 1 : 0 ;m m., ..:.. nm ' . Jan • ". MO .... 'l7 • Ditto Ativettiseil A - - 5 , 1880.. ........... :Bank for Account ' 4)1115 , 1*(1 . "".... ..... tons. fn: A A c c c c o o t u tt n it t 2a ~,. 5. 11;7(.1 .... .. ........ --- 1 P EsOl ---- "'''' , '''--.-----_______ . __ ..... __________ , ku ar , FOREIGN FUNDS THIS DAY AT ONE 0 CLoCK 21ii, 1 ~„.Ito '„an„,,I3011,18 .......... 98t; Peruvian Bonds 1 a t.,." ' O . nds... ................... 07t,, 7 11,„,? Account ............... (-76 Portuguese Bonds 98 Ditto Account f 6 AJKltan Bonds ............ 734 3 Ditto Account 11,741t0 Account .........• 73 14 i I)itto New Bonds f6 3 4,...7 1 7 7 , Butt s , A / r e , Bonus ............ Ditto Account ...... ...,,, _ _ .40,.._ Account ........... ...2.4t4 I Prussian Bonds _ 2 0 1 . ( , ),': Cii'izr Bond s ... ........... g6N 7 Ditto Bonds, IS.'" ,•!0 Account ......... •27 I Russian Ponds, 114.22 '-..bii`tian Bonds ... ....... 02 1 Ditto Account 10M,', h., Account..., ............. —1 Ditto 111 ~..: 9„,, Ditir,to onds, 1824 :Spanish Bonds, P., I _R-2_l 30 tiT ACC'qult ......... 254 a il I Ditto Acc. . . 3?;, 6 ; ' • C BO ll i . ........... Ditto Bonds, ''''-3 t,, ett e k — Accrunt. ............... —' Ditto Account b. 2 Bonds, liii ... ................ 9.9 --- Exchange L — . r --c 1h I 5 ............... . . French Rentes, sp. c — lf —c_ c . 11 Te! Acc0unt........ ........ _ ; ....,„—•.l per cent ..... f _ e. t l;'., 4ittr 13° nds, 5 per cent. 29 ! •. - - ' Exchange -- 5O 50 blot, Account ............... Dutch, 24 p. c ...51M, 'A Ditt o ' 1 Per cent... 401 39} 40 , Ditto Account 96 , , fi N A 0,4,...,. ccount 41 318,e, 401 Ditto, 5p c. 96% ~utim ........ - Ditto Account . „ ......... ....... 89 Pki c i:, -------. ' OF SHARES THIS DAT AT ONR O • CLOCY . ' 1 44 % • k r Paid. Per Share. 9;4 11 :git,, m nt n- Company £7 t....,..ih,06, izisin.inittn,...o. kiss. at si. pm ) XWO 10 b •axiii, g uornpan £lso 142% 15 - "At.iii ao Miningf Company £s 62 , '. 3 'lit% N ""P• Min. Co. (its, at 51. pro.) £ 2B 23' r ....bitt e , s ttlonal Mi i.r. li rar g 9..h 1 :1 Del Rev 8 q _rrt m 1 _ -. mining Company Uoltt 7.h:lining comnanv 3)4 33 £5O 8 4 0 Rnsh hi , ?init4 Co. 'las at 54 pm.) 51% , hftlerm 14 1 " N Company # 411.-ia• n i m ' i T ii i? Association l2 £lO Otall Mining Co. ii;" del m o BCo itm Mein Mining Co....(unreg.) , bittoristin. Co. (iss at 21. om.) 40 411idne. fire Selip I ZoteetW ;IV_ l ir nstirance Comp lO :141,4tralia,;(:. ance Comp. 28% ftler eM bilon li kti al a tkinn Y ''''' is ilico. °4 lPr . Navigation Co. ...... ... 13 °vlncial Bank of England 15 414,,,,,,.. ..................... 2 ----------„,,a11k ot . i ....... 25 51 5014 11 14W4 11N XI 6 0 51 16 15!<, 131( Albit e Con. - rd a - ..EX OF EXCHA itto 1 11.. Rot,: at ...... C.t. 12 5 AntVarn!" 6 ... l2 3 bar° .............. U 12 5 ......... . . . 12 5 ............ 13 111 J l, 3 111 11: l o ...... " sight 25 45 zurdieau_ ............ 2U25 75 71 4 . ............ 25 80 p P e a t t e l i. kr,;;Z n •z ii . : Dl e , B bur a i, ame, Ex. SI 51 efrVble, 3 Us. 10 0 . Mad . I " .2 M. 957 htl.. .... ..... 958 ...................... :3 1 4 4111,p11b::a .... .................... 374 ...................... . 364 4 .................. 36 ......... ................. :36 .I;GE YESTERDAY. Leghorn 48 34 'Genoa. .5 65 Milan 3l Venice 47 Vaples . 4 0 24 Pal et mo per oz. 123 Lisbon 51% Oporto 5.1 Rio Janeiro '37 Bahia 3l Buenos Ayres Dublin, 21 days' sight Cork l% BULLION, PER OZ. s. d. Portugal Gold, coin 0 0 0 Foreign Gold, in bars n 17 1) New Doubloons 0 0 0 , few Dollars Silverhars, standard.— 0 0 0 a l A TEIt AT LONDON /MIDGE TO- MORROW minutes ntter 4.1 Evernrie... 3 minute. , after 5, M iss EDGEWORTH'S NEW WORK. tit 0. the 22d inst., in 3 vols. post Svo., E L E N. D . L By MARIA EDGEWORTH. - " c u." Bentley, New Burlington-street. • (Suecesito r to Hy Co!burn.) t lr i: ti Orders should b e tranmtenritted immediatoly to the to lec_lr lle e Boobts throughout the United Kingdom, early delivery of this Work. la f NO rICE. po l e : day:, when the arrangements for that par te., ar e accompli s h e d, Th e Sun will be conside : f4IY enlarged, and printed with a new and bestir b a :/Pe, east expressly for this Paper by the ce Alex. Wil so n and Sons, of Glasgow. Z' . ' • • ; ..,., -.). - 'oil.il <%4+ ,I, ,4.74i---.4- - -.a , ~ ,,,z i,,, , - i t.--; ...,., V i 'Elp g t , LONDON, " `AI) AY EVENING, FEBRUARY 12, 1834, 'll • Every one, at l east a ll who di d not part i c i pate Prince I..zoPoLD's hospitalities,—and in a Populous city lik e been this, t h e num b er must h ave very great,--believed that he was living in the most frugal manner, and if not hoarding, at least setting apart a considerabl e portion of his a nnuity for the purchase of an estate in his na tive principality, or making a provision for 11!3 relatives. Looking at the way in which the i; ti nee lived, the annuity he received, with a °U Se in t own, a house and park in the country, 114tintilettlption from all taxes, no rationa l b • in g • -Uutett that in the course of time he would be 7 e of th e r i c h es t subjects in the kingdom. ' we tity th ousan d— at the most twenty thousand Year 's - Englishmen thought would cover all expenses ' an d t h ere wou ld consequent ly b e left at the end of 16 years, on the 6th of Nov. 44% the ann i versary of the Princess CHAR 12res death, a surplus of 400,0001. Wha',. Liierefore, was o ur astonishment, and what must be t 'e astoni s h ment of every one, on perusing the letter of Baron de A LTHORP last evening, STOCKMAR, in whichread by Lord t he he states, that p ose sPrince,sing o pquitti ng E ng l a nd (instead outr nearl y half a m illi o n sterling) had e th acted debt s to the amount of 83,0001! In e eatl,,e of truth how can this be ? How can ie Baron account for such a balance against re 4 maste r? Lord ALTHORP says none of the ~e are °ll eY has b een spent out of the country, an d in ; equally certain not a half has been spent it. There is evidently some chicanery in the ' lne ss, and the advisers of the King of the or ti ;, ° , lA lls hav e not consu l te d e i t h er hi s h onour wh."'s digni ty b y recommending the course tv a r „ p h e has adopted. Had he chosen to his °" to Brussels without saying a word about p e 2, lln uitY, the country could not, strictly fig g, have found fault. An unreformed y ea uBe r °F C ommons granted him 50,000/. a sonr,;°r l ife, and he had a right to it unless i nz t-htiew arrangement was made on his accept hittlie Thron e ; but his advisers would not let of a f i li e Ze the country quietly—nothing . short reii„ wing declaration of his determination to i qui s h all personal interest i n t h e annuity agr u e d serv e t h em. He accordingly came to an ap ec en/ell t with t h e Government, as fi xe d an d si gn . " e 48 if i t h ad been confirmed by a bon d b oy :" and sealed. Not a penny of the money, the sPvellsibillys arid _ 08 Yet been paid into the Exchequer, never would have been paid, had not f th e R ub J e ct been brought under the notice o h q :uB. last sess i on. No doubt the persons such In he is surrounded are averse to see they a . lar ge sum as 30,0001. a year, in which eh e Might participate, go into the British Ex oniquer. rris - "at) of course, they would say, is the ): ur o n i n r the bucket when compared with littl e ast revenue of England ; and it would be short o f PUr folly to part with it merely for the for P er ° ) se (4 f ulfilling an injudicious and uncalled to erjaltnent. The business, from beginning the l et t e r as something suspicious about it ; and th e „„. rof the Baron does not at all clear u . p -iyeterv. It only confirms us in the belief that the Prince is deceived by those around him, and not fully aware of the jeopardy in which such proceedings put his character. The state ment of the accounts will bear us out in the remark. His debts are put down at 83,00111., the expense of keeping up the establishments in this country is reckoned at 20,000/. a year, far too much ; and taking the period the Prince has been out of the country at two years, instead of a large surplus on the sth of April, there wiN he a deficiency of 23,000/. Is this meant as a loophole for getting out of the engagement in April ? The surprise of the public certainly would not be greater at such a consummation, than it must be on finding that the debts of the Prince amounted in 1831 to 83,C00/. Well might Mr. RoBINSON say that he was not satis fied with the explanation ; no one in the House, indeed, appeared to be satisfied, at least no one volunteered, as on the former occasion, a word of praise. There was a little of satire in the Hon. Member's motion (a quality for which we did not before give him credit) for a return of all the moneys paid into the Exchequer, &c. &c., when he knew that the return when he got it would contain only one little significant word —nil. The original grant was extravagant, but quite in keeping with the policy of the high Tory Government to be merciless to the tax payers, and prodigally lavish in the expenditure of the public money—granting pensions and places, not as rewards for services, but as bribes to prop . . up their political power. The present Govern ment have felt the consequence by the opposi- tion which most of their plans have met with from the highest to the lowest officer in every public department. In the House of Commons last night, Lord ALTHORP, in reply to a question put to him by an Hon. Member on a former evening, stated that it was the intention of Government shortly to introduce a measure for the establishment of Local Courts of Justice. This announcement was received with loud cheers—a convincing proof that, wherever else the measure may be in disfavour, with the representatives of the people it is rightly appreciated. We are sur prised that it was not originally brought forward in the Lower House. It is essentially a House of Commons question, addressing itself, not to the titled and wealthy, but to the poor and oppressed classes of society. It is poverty's best friend—if poverty can be said to have a friend in a country where Mammon is the uni versal idol—the sacred teg,is which is to protect it from the assaults of the raJacious and the unprincipled. What then had their Lordships to do with such a question ? What possible interest could they have, as at present consti tuted, in attentively considering its deserts ? How could they be expected to think favourably of cheap justice, when one of their most pro minent Members derives a princely income from i!s most flagrant abuse ? It is clear, from their supercilious mode of discussing it last session, from the utter i 'scorn with which they treated its details—front the feverish and splenetic impatience with which they flung it from them as " a thing ac cursed"—that the House of Lords either did not, or would not, comprehend the nature of the measure. Either their ignorance or their obstinacy, or possibly both, bewildered them. Faction too, no doubt, had a good deal to do with the question. It was tainted with Whigism—therefore it must be corrupt. It was suggested by the LORD CHANCELLOR— therefore it must be superficial. It smelt of Reform, therefore it must be unsavory in aristo cratic nostrils. Thus, for the space of one whole year, owing to their Lordships' combined ignorance, obstinacy, and factiousness, have the people been deprived of one of the greates t blessings that can be conferred on society— safe, cheap, and expeditious justice We have little idea that the House of Lords will throw out the measure this next time. They will try hard to do so, of course : ELDON will weep, and LYNDHURST will sneer ; WYNFORD will prose, and ELLENBOROUGH will have recourse to sophistry; nevertheless the Bill will pass, even though, in addition to this oppo sition, four and twenty Bishops uplift their crosiers against it. The truth is, every day that passes works a silent but perceptible effect on the popular influence of the House of Lords, diminishing the sphere of its authority, and widen ing the lines of demarcation between it and the people. What their Lordships may attempt with impunity one session, they must not so much as dream of the next. Last Near, for instance, they rejected the Local Courts Bill with contempt ; this year, however sulkily, they will pass it—backed, as it no doubt will be, by the deliberate sanction of a vast majority of the representatives of the people. On the motion of Lord ELLENBOROUGII, a Select Committee was appointed in the House of Lords last night, to " consider the means of facilitating the exchange, division, and enclo sure of lands lying in common fields, meadows and pastures, and to report their opinion there-, upon to the House." After one or two ques tions of little or no public importance had been asked and answered, the Huuse adjourned till Thursday. Mr. HUME last night moved for a Committee to inquire into the expenses charged by return ing officers at the last election, with a view to fix a uniform rate of charge, and also to consi der by whom the charges should be paid. The Hon. Member's motion was agreed to, and very properly, for there is nothing that more impera tively demands the attention of a reformed House of Commons than the present extrava gant system of electioneering expenditure. Sir SAMUEL WHALLEY threw out a hint that the whole costs of election should be borne by the nation at large. On the motion of Mr. WARD, another Committee was ap poi►nted to inquire into the best mode of ob taining correct and authentic lists of the divisions of the House, with instructions to report thereon without delay. In the course of the evening Bills were brought in by Sir T. FREMANTLE “nd Mr. O'CONNELL for the disfranchisement of the boroughs of Stafford and Carrickfergus. .f39IG L.; They were afterwards read a first, and ordered to be read a second, time on the sth of March. Mr. BROCKLEHURST last night gave notice that he should move, on the 25th of March, for a Select Committee to inquire into the constitution of the South Sea Company, with a view to pay off, or to transfer, the Funds of the said Company to the Consolidated Fond, and to provide for the payment of the dividends thereon by the Bank of England. The French papers of Mondav have come to hand, but they are de , titute of interest or im• portance. The Spanish Ministry were busy endeavouring to extricate the nation from its financial embarrassments, for which and other purposes the Cortes were to be convoked. It is said that the Emperor of RUSSIA affects to be very easy on the score of politics, and devotes himself to gaiety and feasiingtt he good people of St. Petersburgh, thirty thousand of whom were invited to a grand ball ! FRENCH FUNDS.—Putts, I'm 10. Five per Cents., 105 f. 90e. Three per Cents., 75f. Mc. 75c. National Loan, 105 E SOc. Bank Actions, 1,72 if Rente de riaples, 911. 40c. Roman Five per Cents., 92. Rente d'Espagne, Five per Cents., 25 1 4. Rente d'Espagne, Three per Cents., 38K, Royal Spanish Loan, 73. Rente Perpet. d'Espagne, Five per Cents., 60 %. Belgian Loan, 1831, Five per Cent, 98. EXCHANGE ON LONDON. c. One month, pa i: er, 25f. 30e. • money, 25f. 27 Three months, paper, 25f. 15c. ; money, 20f. —Ours Authentique. Brussels papers of the 10th instant have been received. One of them states that the Govern- ment will shortly present to the Chambers a project of law for the purpose of declaring neu tral the territory of some entrepots in our mari time cities, in order that foreigners may there import and export by their ships all kinds o' merchandise, without being. subject to any for mality, duty, or superintendence, this liberty to continue till they have sold their goods either for consumption, transit, or re•exportation. These papers contain no other news. BELGIAN FUNDS..—BRUSSELS, FEB 8. Actual Debt, 2 per Cent. Rothschild's Loan, 5 per Cent 95 Loan of the City, 1832, 4 per Cent ••• 92 14, —Brussels Papers to Feb. 10. The following extracts, from German papers received this morning, require no comment : VIENNA, FEB. I.—The German Congress will probably last several months, continuing, at the same time, to be sedulously occupied. 'I here was another full sitting yesterday, under the presidency of Prince Metternich, which lasted from half-past eleven to half-past two. Now that the Eastern affairs are set tled, attention is devoted to those of Spain, which alone affect our funds, our exchange following the impulse of that of Paris. By the change of ministry in Spain the aspect of affairs is changed, and the announced recognition of the actual Govern ment by the Northern Powers is again deferred. This will doubt less be carried into effect as soon as it is deemed the new admi. nistration possesses sufficient power and confidence to put an end to the civil war,without at the same time renouncing the moderate system, founded on monarchical principles, hitherto observed. Reform continues to advance in Servia. A journal in the Servian language appears also in Kragujewatz ; it comprises politics and literature, and is under the special direction of M. Davidowich. The first number gives an account of the visit of Prince Milosch to Belgrade. The Hessian Minister of State, Meyssenberg, has arrived here. AUSTRIAN FUNDS. Jan. 31. Feb. I. Five per Cents 95 17-32 95 7-10 Four per Cents. SS 1-16 55 5 6 Bank Shares (ex div.) ...... 1218,6 122236 Allgemeine Zeitung, Feb. 6. So long since as the Btil of March, 1831, we stated in The Sun, that some strong repre sentations had been made to the Government by a Mr. BOYD, relative to the vast abuse of patronage, and gross misappropriation of the funds of the turnpike roads, under the existing irresponsible domination ; and, from Lord MELBOURNE'S communication to that gentle. man, we were led to assume that the reign of misgovernment in this wide field for peculation and corruption would, ere long, be subjected to some wholesome revision. The facts elicited by a Committee of the House of Lords last year, coupled with evi dences of delinquencies furnished even by the participators themselves, left no doubt of the p.opriety of substituting some more efficient and responsible control ; his Majesty's Ministers have therefore determined, as will be seen by the announcement of Lord HOWICK in the House of Commons, to bring in a Bill to " consolidate the trusts, and place the turnpike roads under a general plan of regulaion." To the indefatigable exertion of Mr. BoYD —his practical acquaintance with the deformities of the systetn—the perspicuity with which he has laid them naked, and the unwearied atten tion the Duke of RICHMOND has bestowed upon the subject, we believe the public will be indebted for the advantages that will doubtless result from the proposed reformation of the Turnpike Laws. COURT OF CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY, EX PARTE COTWELL. Mr. ANDERDON appeared as Counsel for the petitioner, Ann Rogers Cotwell, spinster. The object was to have a Commis sion of Review. It was necessary the respondent should be served with the order to hear the petition. He was an officer in the navy and out of the jurisdiction,but not abroad on public service. His agents would not inform the petitioner where he might be found, nor consent to receive on his behalf notice of any service of proceedings. The intention of the petitioner was to have the marriage entirely annulled, and as she felt this to be exceedingly important to her interests and happiness in life, the Learned Counsel hoped his Lordship would give her that satisfaction which she humbly sued for from the judicature of her country. The proposition now was, that service of the petition, and of the order to hear the petition in three months from this time upon the respondent's agents, proctors, and last place of residence in this country, should be considered good service. The LORD CHANCELLOR hoped the petitioner was aware of the many objections there were in the way of obtaining a Commission of Review ; however, under the circumstances, he had no objection to give this liberty of service, and to let the hearing of the petition stand peremptorily fixed for that day, although it might depend upon what transpired in the interim, whether it should be heard or not. BIRKETT V. HIBBERT, ♦ WARD. Africa. Mr. PEPYS appeared on behalf of the gentleman who had married the Ward, and the case came before the Court upon an objection to the Master's Report. In the first instance the complaint camebefore his Lordship, that Mr. Reed had married the Ward without the consent of the Court; both he and his father were committed; the father was discharged without costs, and he himself was subsequently liberated upon undertaking to execute such settlement as the Court should approve of. It was referred to the Master to approve of a settlement ; and the question now was, upon the Master's report, whether the settlement the Master had approved of ought or ought not to be confirmed. It was such a settlement as had never either been adopted by the Court before, or approved of by any Master whatever. Proposals on both sides had been car. ried, in which in themselves differed but very little, both concurring that in the event of there being no children of the marriage, the wife should have the power of appointment, which of course would give her the opportunity, should she be so minded of making some provision for her hus band. The Master had approved of a settlement, by which, in the event of their being no children, her interest in her pro_ perty both real and personal, was to be cut down to a life estate, and that after her decease, the whole should go over to strangers. The young lady was the only legitimate child of her father. Her mother was dead, but she had several brothers and sisters. Her next of kin were entire strangers to her ; they lived in Yorkshire, and were quite un known to her. The master's proposal was, that after her decease, in the event of no issue, the whole of her pro perty should go over to her heirs or next of kin. This could not fail to strike his Lordship as a most extraordinary proposition. It was neither more nor less than taking away from a ward her own independent property, which no human being had a right to interfere with. In cer. tain cases the Court had taken every care that the property should remain under a ward's own control ; but it had never before been attempted to remove her property entirely from her. This young lady's property consisted of 7001. a year. The husband was entirely without property, and his only offence was having married the ward without his Lordship's consent. There was no aggravation, nor any improper conduct in the case beyond the contempt. In the case of Millett r. Rouse, in 7th Vesey, jun. p. 19, an individual married a ward of the age of 14 by license, having previously taken the usual oath ; he was indicted for perjury, convicted and suffered the punishment of pillory and iry orisonment, but still, even in that case, the Court, upon a petition, gave the wife, at her decease, if she thought praper, the power of appointing in his favour. In " Bathurst against Murray," F. Vesey, page 74, in "Pearce against Crookfield," in the sth of Vesey, and in many other cases, there had been c. spiracles and other highly aggravated cir cumstances, yet in none of them had the power of the ulti mate disposal of the ward's property been taken from her, therefore the Learned Counsel submitted the Court would have to direct some modification of the master's present proposal. Mr. COLLINS was on the same side. Even in many of the most aggravated cases, an allowance to the husband had been permitted out of the wife's fortune. Mr. RICHARDS was Counsel in support of the report, and on behalf of the father of the young lady, and had to submit that the Master had not come to an erroneous conclusion in adopt ing such a course as would effectually prevent the husband and his family from being benefitted by the young lady's property. Whatever the nature of the settlement might be it was entirely discretionary with the Court, and this was a case in which the settlement ought to be of the strictest nature. Mr. Reed, sen., had induced the plaintiff to remove his daughter from an establishment in the neighbourhood ofßelgrave-sguare, and to place her in his (Mr. Reed's) house, where he and his son concocted the marriage, keeping the lady's father in entire ignorance of the circumstance. The Loan CHANCELLOR was not aware of any very aggra. vated circumstances in this case. Although the settlement was always discretionary with the Court, yet it appeared no autho rity had carried the settlement to the extent now proposed. Mr. RICHARDS said that the object was to secure the property to the lady's own use, and afterwards to her own right heirs. If the Court should feel a hesitation in confirming the report, the lady's father would not object to its being so far altered as to give the lady an unlimited power of appointment in any way except in favour of the husband, or of his immediate family. The Loan CHANCELLOR considered the proposal went beyond any thing of the sort that had ever been submitted to the Court; he would see Master Farrow nn the subject, who had made the report, and then state his own opinion upon it. SHIPPING INTELLIGF,NCE-(THIS DAY.) FROM LLOYD'S. DEAL, FEB. 11.—Wind W. by S.. moderate.—Remain the William, for St. Vincents ; the American brig Othello, and a few others. PORTSMOUTH, FEB. 11.—Wind N. W. to W.—Sailed the Ernaad, Gillett, for Madras and Bengal ; and the Upton Castle, Duggan, for the Cope and Bombay. PLYMOUTH, FEB. 10.—Wind S.S.W., fresh breezes. FALMOUTH, FEB. 10.—Wind S.W., strong breezes and squally.—Put back the Permei, Harris, for the Mauritius. DOVER, FEB 11.—Arrived off port the Shepherd, Lewesay, from the Mauritius, sailed on the 11th November; Othello, Scott, from New York ; and the Harriet, Moyse, from Limerick. COWES, FEB. 11.—Arrived the Dolphin, Aden, from Lis. bon, leaky. . . BRISTOL, FEB. 11.—Arrived the Englishman, Aysh, from LIVERPOOL, FEB. Io.—Arrived the Lotus, Watts, from Natchez; Thetis, Stewart, from Yarmouth, N.S. ; Barrington, Tate, from Odessa; Calista, Pallot, from Trieste; Lusitania, Cook, from Oporto; and Iris, Bernard, from Bordeaux. Off port the Calcutta, Grundy, from Bombay. NEWRY, FEB. 10.—Arrived the Abby, Tipper, from Sa vannah, nearly full of water, bound to Dartmouth. THE MARKETS.-(THIS DAY.) CORN EXCHANGE. The arrivals of all kinds of grain this week are moderate, and of Flour fair. The trade for every article remains much the same as reported on Monday, and the business transacted is limited. In Flour no variation. ARRIVALS. Wheat. Barley. Oats. English Irish I 340 410 1,0:20 Foreign l,llO Flour. "6 580sacke PARLIAMENTARY PAPERS. MONEYS IN THE EXCHEQUER. EXCHEQUER BILLS, AND EAST INDIA HALF- PAY. AN ACCOUNT. ohowing the AMOUNT of MONEYS in the EXCHEQUER, and remaining to be rec-i•rd on the 10. h February, 1834, to complete the Aids granted by Parliament for the Service of the Year 1833 -34. _ _ _ To be Raised. 577,800 0 0 Exchequer Bil's remaining to he issued towards the Ways and Means, 18X1-4 To be brought from the Consolidated Fund, per Act 3 William IV., c. 18. Ditto ditto ditto 3 and 4 William IV., c. 96 6,000,000 0 0 East India Company, per Act 3 Will. IV., c. 1 in the Exchequer 6,3331/ Money paid by Thomas Rippon, on account of the commissioners for the Issue of Ex. chequer Bills for Public Works, per Act 3 William IV., c. 1, in the Exchequer 21,0001. Total to be Raised 6,688.140 11 Total in the Exchequer 27,331 0 0 Total 6,715,471 11 al 11. AN ACCOUNT of ALL EXCHEQUER RILLS or authorized to be issued, on the Supplies 1834, Unprovided for. 27,752.6501. 111. AN ACCOUNT of ALL EXCHEQUER BILLS issued between sth Jantriry, 1833. and sth Janu.iry, 1834, under the Acts 5 Geo. IV.. c. 103, 1 and 2 Will. IV., e. 24, and 2 and 3 Will. IV., c. 125, Unprnyii.d for. The Amount of Exchequer Bills issued for Building additional Churches, in the Year ended sth January 1034 Ditto ditto For Carrying on Public Works and Fisheries, in the Year ended sth January, 1834 384,100 Ditto ditto For giving Relief to Persons who have sustained Losses in the West Indies, in the Year ended sth January, 1834 Total £632,050 T. SPRING RICE. Whitehall, Treasury Chambers, Feb. 10, 1834. THE FUNDS.-(THIS DAY.) CITY, TWELVE O'CLOCK. The only arrival this morning is Singapore papers to the 4th of October, received at the North and South American Coffee house. (From the Singapore Paper of the 3d of October.) We are happy to observe that the Buges prows are ar riving daily in numbers, and the season promises well; the imports by the native vessels during the week show that a large quantity of tortoiseshell and other valuable articles of eastern produce brought by them have come to our markets. The tortoiseshell is rather inferior to that of last season. In Java it seems the natives are apparently quiet, but in reality discontented. Letters from Batavia state, that it is the intention of the Government to make Batavia, and two mi'es round it, an intrenchment, which will cost the Government 15 or 16,000,000 of guilders, and ten years' labour. Accounts from China state that business has been greatly in. terrupted by the flood from the Canton river. The delivery of Opium in July is stated to be at 1,220 chests. By the French mail this morning, accounts from Madrid state, that Navarre and Biscay are tar from being tranquil. St. Sebastian, Tolosa, Vittoria, and even Laguna, with Pampc. luna, are surrounded by insurgents. THE FUNDS. Although the Express has arrived from Paris, we are still des. titute of any information in respect to the acknowledgment of the Cortes Bonds by the Spanish Government, and the infor mation from Madrid is of little importance, or indeed from any part of the Continent. The Funds continue much in the same state as they left off' yesterday. Consols, 89 M % for the Ac count ; Spanish, 30 to 14 ; Portuguese, 67 M The French Funds come 75f. 75c. Spanish from Paris, 25 IA owing to the rise in London. _ _ HALF-PAST ONE. Consols continue at the same price as in the early part of the day, 89 14 % for the Account, with little doing. The foreign prices are much the same as yesterday : Spanish, 30 % ; Portuguese, 66 %67 ; Mexican, 40, which is lower owing to unfavourable reports from that quarter. THREE 0' CL 0 CK. Consols for the Account, 89; CLOSING PRICES. Bank Stock 216 3 per Cent. Red B9 3 pet Cent. Cons 31 per Cent. 34 per Ccnt. Red 98 New 3i per Cent......... 97 4 percent 1031 Long. Ann. to expire Jai, 1880; l7 5-16 Oct 1859•• l7 3-16 Jar.. 1860 l7 —FOUR O'CLOCK India Stock 249 Ditto Bonds 213 pm South Sea Stock Ditto Old Anti Ditto New Ann. - Ex. Bills, 10 , 4../ 47 pm. Ditto F. O/ 47 inn, Ditto Small 47 pm Bank S. for - Consols for Opg B.9t India St. for Opg. FUNDS. Portuguese, 5 per cent 671 Ditto, Beg. Bonds Prussian, 5 per cent. Russian Bonds, 5 per cent losi 1)i t to, Metallic ...... Spanish, 5 per cent 3Ui Ditto, 182:3 27 French 5 per Cent.... li 6r. 25c Exchange 2sf 4Uc French :3 per Cent —t. —c. Dutch, 1i per cent. soi Ditto, 5 per cent .. 961 IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT THIS DAY, WEDNESDAY, FEB. 12. HOUSE OF COMMONS. The SPEAKER took the Ch shortly after twelve o'clock. Lord SANDON brought 11) the R,part of the COIT mittee on 'h.. Liv, , rpA G •s Mr. WARBURTON lowed to e rl. the p irticultr atten :ion of tl.e Noble Lord (Althorp) to a petition which he had been requested to present from a gentleman, well known in the literary world, named Hatchatd. That gentleman had been beneficially interested in c •rtain funded -,troperty, which stood in the name of one trustee only. th e late Mr. Henry Fauntleroy. Upon application or the payment of the dividends upon that stock after he death of Mr. Fauntleroy, and, upon a request made to the Bank that a new trustee might be appointed, chat establishment, in answer to that request, stated that he prop -rty in which Mr. Hatchard was interested, and f which Fauntleroy was the sole trustee, in consequence , f the conviction of F,suntl , roy, had become an escheat to the crown. As soon as this answer was received, Mr. Hatchard, the party beneficially interested, applied t counsel on the subject, and although there was a difference ot opinion, the tnaj•trity were satisfied Ott the property teas escheated. Mr. Hatchard was then advised to allow an inqu , st to he held to ascertain whether the property had be come escheated or not ; and if that inquest s ould find that it had been escheated, that he should accept it hack from the Crown by way grant. An inquest was held .n some little hole or corner of the St:et , ffs' Court. a nd the property was declared to be escheated. On the parties coming to inquire into the manner in which a grant was to beobtained of the property back again from the Crown. upon examining the Stamp Duties Art it was discoveree. that although it) the grant err real property a duty only was payable of about 1/ 155., yet chattel property was liable to an ad valorem duty of five per cent., and in the present case that duty plane would amount to no less a sum than between 2001. anti 3(101. All this had taken place as long ago as the year 1824. On a represen.a tion of the hardship of the case having been made to the Treasury they a.trnitted its hardship, and promised to rectify the mistake in the Stamp Act, putting chattel property cri ttte same footing as real. During all that time the pe titioner had been waiting for the promised correction. o the Stamp Act, but they had never yet taken place. The tenth year bad now arrived, and in case the tenth year expired without the dividends on the Stock being de tnanded, it woul t be transferred as a mutter of c.,urse, to the Commissioners for the reduction of the tional Debt. This was one case in which Henry Fauntleroy was sole trustee of the property. There w;a an application for a new trustee in the place of Henry Ftuntleroy. The Bank of E, land, he it recol lected, had not stopped the p yinent of the dividem's which were paid up to the present time ; but in answer to this application for a new trustee, he would 'cad to the House what the solicitor to the Bank stated. He signified the refusal of the Bank to allow the appoint. went bt a new trustee, inasmuch as Henry Fauntleroy's interest in the stock was forflred to the Crown. Now the Bank, by continuing to pay the dividends, had admitted that the property was not forfeited, but when applic4tion was made for the insertion of the came of a new trustee, the answer was, that the property was forfeited. He be lieved that, though in the fist case, when Henry Fan:, tleroy was the sole tru- tee, the 14w was curie, tly laid down, hut he thought that the interpretation of the law in the second case, where there were other trustees, was incor rect. In common cases, where one of several trustees had the property vested in the survivors, why the rule shout•, he different, he (Mr. Warburton) could nut con ceive.—( Hear.) The question, then, was, what w a s to be done in cases of this kind ? Fortunately for the indi- vidual in the present case, he was in a state of affluence. Before an inquest could he held for ascertaining whether the property had escheated to the Crown he was obliged to pay 1001. to meet the expenses of the inquest. If the stock duty amounted to lOW., the whole amount would bt paid in the way of expenses to recover the stock. Was it not fit that the House and the courier) should know the situation in which innocent per. sons would be placed, if their trustees were found No de se, or a felon. The title to the real alto chattel property of the kingdom fir the last sixty years, to which petiod the rights of the Crown extended, won he thus escheated. Suppose a tiustee of real propert should commit suicide, it would he a most hard thing i the rightful owners were thus to be de; rivet of 'heir pro wily. The event of the claims to which this would give rise was of great importance, and it appeared tti him that the proper course would be that a Bill should be brough in, not as a simple remedy given to those who should solicit a remittance of the Small Stamp Act, but a Bill declaring that in costs of a trustee—a fair trustee—becoming a felon, or undergoing a civil death, the property should not be. ime au escheat to the (.rown, but should vest in trustees acting beneficially for the parties interested. It was not in the power of an individual without the consent of the Crown to introduce such a system ; but if the Noble Lord as cured him that on the production of such a Bill the fin ma o jection to it would nut be insisted upon, from the en couragement he had received, he wool' undertake to introduce such a Bill. A Noble Lord, formerly a Judg , had promised to superintend such a Bill in the House to Lords He (Mr. Warburton) hoped that the Noble Lon , would give hors the assurance, that if such a Bill wens submitted to the Lords of the Treasury, the pro form. objection to it would be waved, and that he would b allowed to introduce it. He believed that he had gone over all the heads contained in the p•tition; he would only state that this was not a single case, that there were a great outoher of individuals with small property who were in the same situa ;oil, who were w iting the resu tof this petition, but whose properties were so small that they could not go to the expenses of a Bill. As then this was no a solitary case, but affected a great number of inilivi. duals, be hoped the Noble Lord would throw no impedi ments in the way of such a Bill. Lord ALTHORP said he had not the least hesitation in saying, that the statements which had ben mad showed a case of very extreme hardship. With reap, et to the individual. it was well known to the Hon. Member th a t he (Lord Althorp) had the honour and the pleasur of his acquaintance. The case had not come under hi noire befiire, otherwise he should have felt it his due, to take immediate steps tor an inquiry into it, sad to have redressed the grievance at the earliest ma ment.—(Hear, hear.) At to the question put to blot by the Honourable Member, he could only say that hi would give his advice, and he had little doubt it wool be acted upon, that no formal obj-ction should be tak• to the introduction of such a Bill as that spoken of. He was quite aware that there were many cases of a simila nature, in some of which the hardship was no doubt tiler , severe than at present. Mr. WARBURTON said the ease had been met by the Noefe Lord in the s p irit that he expected from the pre en Government. He bat. forgot to sac that in s eakinur to th Steicaor_General that Hon, and Learned Gentleman hal given him autiotrity to say, that, as an individual, lie thought such a Bill ought to tie brought in, in order t meet all similar cases, both past, present, and future. Mr. SHAWE presented a petition from Lowest off numerously signed by Protestant Dissenters, praying that a national registry of births and deaths should he esta blialied, that they might be allowed to eel, brate marriage according to their own forms; that they might he relieved from church rates, and other charges for the celebration of worship in the Established Church ; and that the Uni versities of Oxford and Cambridge might be thrown open to them. Toe Hon. Gentleman supported all the prayer• of the petition, a xcept so far as regarded die two Univer sities. The Dissenters of Suffolk had lately presented • petition to Earl Giey, and the statements they then m tde had been most grossly misrepresented through the medium of the public press. He bad been requested to correc that mistake, which he then did, by denying in their nam that they were at all inimical to the close connexion tha now exis•ed between Church and State. Mr. SHEPPERD presented a petition from Fantle to the same effect. Mr. BLAMIRE presented a petition from the: parish of Caldbeck, in the county of Cumberland, complaining of the vast number of actions that had been brought for th recovery of tithes daring the list year; complaining of the vast expense incurred in defending such actions, an prayinat the interference of tie House. He understood the case was now under the consideration of the Government, and that in a very short time they would state their in tentions. He trusted they would give satisfaction t• the country, and if not abate the evil, at ail event , lessen the expense of the trials. If that answer was not satisfactory to him, lie should be again under the necessi , y of troubling the House with the measure which he had introduced last year. Sit R. PEEL presented a petition from a person named Holman, who had for many years acted in the charade , of assignee, praying that the House would not atiolish im prisonment for debt without very mature consideration. Also one from the minister, churchwardens, an i inha bitants of the parish of St. Paul's, Southampton, in which they stated th e ir fi rm atta chment to the church and its sure which would w e aken its efficiency. He cordialfy liturgy, and praying the Howe not to sanction any n e - a . supported the prayer of the petition, but he could not join in any of the fears expressed therein. The Church of FOREIG Austrian, 5 per cent 99 Belgian, 5 per cent 971 Brazilian Bonds Buenos Ayres, 6 per cent 251 chilian. 6 per cent........., 27 Columbian, 6 per cent.- 22 Ditto, 1824 25 Danish 741 Greek, 5 per cent 231 Mexican 5 per Cents, 1825 31 Ditto 6 per Cent., 1825 391 Peruvian 6 per Cent. 2l HOUSE OF COMMONS, THIS EVENING. Nothing of any importance took place up to the time of our going to Press. England was so motet! in the hearts of tie penpte, that if ,ny attempt at spoliatiml wa , rzt .4e the e woultl he . l el l 3 miriif,s,it;itn ~f p,1;1:0 ai would at o: , ce cause it to be withdrawn. i inhatritanrs l o i af f i l t i S iw b , i i c u oh g f I he I t ev ; f r o i r l w tr,. a c r ili t , l nu, a zahi ne p s, e n) t e i , :f a d. n unr f o r dt o u err t; e i e .t requests, in name, that the law concerning the r..gistration Of baths awl matriages rmiy he ;dieted. he !Treed in. T near! ‘174 , , to obtain the sanction of law 'or the cele. hration of marriages by Dissenting :Ministers ; in This the l inn, non, er did not agree. The next point he Gk--:vise is dirt it ado,tintt, and h•-• need say nothing to show the ooreasonablerie.s of it, more than by m•ntusing the fol. ] , swing request with which it was connected. It asked for permission to nury in parochial cemeteries. And in the last p the petitioners prayei fir an exemption rotn church rates. There were many ohjections to such a demand, but he (Mr. Huee.i) considered it really unr , asonabie that ;wo such demands .hou'd he ,s nothing could demonstrate more fully the atisur , , airy of one, than that it should be immediately siice..eded cry the ocher —(Hear, bear.) When the petition. rs waited on him, be stated his total dissent from three parts .if their petition. In fact they, in his mind, had little to complain of; as far as concerned the bolding m chip c. es, they were just situated in the same way as the tnewbers of other Christian communiti , s. Protes•anis built churches and were n16.-,ted to pay rates—and Lk iv se senters built their chore` es and wire liable to the same rate, , , so that there was a similarity between them as re.: ; larded all to the support of their respective churches. The Hon. A.lotober alluded to a book called the " Parliamentary Comp.nion," a v• ry useful one cer tainly—in which he (Mr. Hughes) was described as pos. s-ssing some share of Church patronage. He begged to state that such was not the case. _ Mr. HARVEY begged to say, that he considered thC Dissenting, Ministers as pious and as fit to teach the thY.- trioes of Christianity , s any others. Mr. HUGHES explained- He did not impugn their fitness to teach the precepts of Chri*tianity, hut he ob ict,4l to their coming into the possession of an income from burial grounds. - Mr. GUEST did not know that any inttome would arise from such a permis , ion as the petition Rouelit for. Mr. 110DGES presented two diff.rent peti , ions from separate parishes in Kent, praying for a comremtation of tithes. 'The Hnn. Alemher alum presented t.ever.,l petitions from various parishes in K-nt. AIY) a ;.eilti,,tl from Horsemunda, for a reasonable a'teration in rho . Church E*-a'di•hment. Lird SANDON preen►ed three petition• from differ , nt Di , senting !Hobe , . in the town of Liverpool, praying fur the bet er ohm«•rvance r,f the gibbith. Mr. WILSON PATTEN brought up a Bill to ei ar g e and amend the powers of the St. Helen's Runcorn G,:p Railway Bill. Mr. HODGES presented a petition from certain pro prierors of land in Ker.t and Sus.ex, contigiious to rhr: river Melway, complainin4 of the abuses of a coin i,any established by Act of Parliament in the reign of Charles the Se-end, with reeard ro the navigation of that river, charging that Company with havinz exceeded their powers in some respects, and having in regard to other matters not c , implied with the Act of Parliament, and it prayed tor an inquiry.---Ordered to lie fit th, to le. At twenty minutes past one o'clock, the Seitaxea left the Chair. FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZETTE. OFFICE OF THE LORD CHAMBERLAIN TO THE QUEEN, Queen's House, St. James's, Feb. 10, 1834. _ Notice is hereby given, that the Drawing-Room of the '2 4th instant, being a Birthday Drawing-Room, no presentations can take place on that day. . It is earnestly requested, that all Ladies attending the Queen's Drawing-Rooms, do appear in dresses of British manufacture. QUEEN'S.HOUSE, ST. JAMES'S-PALACE, FEB. 6. This day the Chevalier de Lima, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary from her Most Faithful Majesty the Queen of Portugal and the Algarves, had his audience of leave of her Majesty ; and Monsieur de Moraes Sarmento, his suc cessor in the same character, had his first audi, nee of her Ma jesty : To which they were respectively introduced by the Earl of Denbigh. her Majesty's Lord Chamberlain, and conducted by Sir Robert Chester, Knt., Master of the Ceremonies. Commission by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Surrey. Surrey Regiment of Yeomanry Cavalry. Edward Kerrich, Gent., to be Cornet, vice Barclay, promoted, dated Jan. 30. WHITEHALL, JAN. 3. The Lord Chancellor has appointed Charles Walter Wyatt, of St. Asaph, in the county of Flint, Gent., to be a Master Ea. traordinary in the High Court of Chancery. DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY. JOH;1 ROMANIS, hosier, Gracechurch.street, London. BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. JOHN TAYLOR, grocer, Bradford. BANKRUPTS. JAMES FARMER, sugar-refiner, Osborn.street, White. chapel, to surrender Feb. 25, at one, and March 25, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Templer and Shearman, Great lower-street; Graham, official assignee, Copthall-buildings. WILLIAM HENRY BULLOCK, tailor, Rupert-street, Feb. 19 and March 25, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Clayton and Eaton, Lancaster-place, Strand; Cannan, official assignee, Lothbury. GEORGE BAYLEY, ship breaker, Rotherhithe, Surrey, Feb. 21, at twelve, and March 25, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Kitchener, official assignee, Lothbury; Lacy and Bridges, King's Arms-yard, Coleman-street. WILLIAM FRY, chymist, Bristol, Feb. 18 and March 25, it eleven, at the Commercial-rooms, Bristol. Cook, New Inn, London ; Gillard. Bridge.parade, Bristol. JOHN BILLINTON, jun., scriviner, Wakefield, Yorkshire, Feb. 19, at the Court House, Wakefield, and March 25, at the Court House, Leeds, at eleven. Flower, Bread-street, London ; Robinson, Wakefield. JA MES BUTTER WORTH, cotton-spinner, Rochdale, Feb. 25 and March 25, at ten, at the Commissioners' Rooms, Blanchester. Woods, Rochdale; Grundy, Bury ; Norris, Allen, and Anthony, Great Ormond-street, London. JOHN BROADBERRY, coal-dealer, North Collingham, Nottinghamshire, Feb. 211 and March 25, at ten, at the Clinton Arms Inn, Newark.upon-Trent. Lee, Newark-upon-Trent ; Milne, Parry, Milne, and Morris, Mitre-court, Temple, London. JAMES LAING, ship-builder, Stockton-upon-Tees, Dur ham, March 4 and 25, at eleven, at the Bridge Inn, Bishop Weannouth. Abbs, Newcastle-upon-Tyne ; Wilson, Sunder. ; Miller, Furnival's Inn, London. GERARD COWELL and JOHN ACTON, jun., cotton. spinners, Manchester, March 4 and 25, at eleven, at the Com nissioners' Rooms, Manchester. Adlington, Gregory, and Faulkner, Bedford-row, London ; Leigh, Wigan. JAMES TENCH, scriviner, Wribbenhall, Kidderminster, Worcestershire, Feb. 19 and March 25, at two, at the Talbot Inn, Stourbridge. Stevens, Wood, Wilkinson, and Satchell, Cheapside, London; Flint, Stafford. GEORGE THOMPSON, jun., coach-builder, Huddersfield, Feb. 18 and March 25, at ten, at the George Inn, Hudders field. Wavell, Halifax; Adlington, Gregory, and Faulkner, Bedford.row, London. DIVIDENDS. M. Richard and W. Roberts, merchants, Angel-court, March 6, at two, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Page, linen iraper, Thame, Oxfordshire, March 6, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Collier, hosier, Poultry, March 5, at eleven, it the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Cecil, leather-seller, Upper shames-street, March 4, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy —J. E. C. Bentley, curiosity-dea'er, Wigmore-sti eet, Caven dish-square, March 6, at half-past twelve, at the Court of Bank ruptcy—lt. Topharn, linen-draper, Dockhead, Bermondsey, March 5, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. T. 'Wal ker, watchmaker, Oxford-street, March 5, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy—G. Duckworth, printer, Fleet-street, March 5, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Lowe, victualler, Leamington Priors, Warwickshire, March 6, at eleven, at the Crown Hotel, Leamington Priors—W. Roberts, cloth.mariu. idcturer, Churwell, Yorkshire, March 5, at eeven, at the Court House, Leeds—C. Pope, copper-manufacturer, out.parish of St. Philip and Jacob, Gloucestershire, March 31, at one, at the Commercial-rooms, Bristol—W. Booth, boot factor, Liverpool, March 5, at two, at the Clarendon-rooms, Liverpool—C. Pal. !reyman, calico-printer, Manchester, March 7, at eleven, at the Commissioners'-rooms, Manchester—J. and W. Thompson, merchants, Rawden, Yorkshire, March 6, at one, at the Claret]. dcn-rooml, Liverpool. CERTIFICATES, MARCH 4.. G Graves, innkeeper, Skinburness, Cumberland—W. Moss, carpenter, Monk Sherborne, Southampton—S. Bottomlev, woolstapler, Huddersfield, Yorkshire—F. Balkwill, corn-factor, Plymouth—J. C. S. Stead, corn.tactor, Mark-lane. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. W. and J. Thomason, fustian-manufacturers, Manchester— R. and W. Crabtree, millers, Burnley, Lancashire—D. Green and H. Stretton, trimmers, Leicester —R. J. Marsh and S. T. elk, coal merchants, Middle-wharf, Great Scotland-yard—R. Whitley, P. Brames, and T. Milne, nurserymen, Fulham— Brissenden and T. Hodges, upholsterers, lonbridge-wells— G. and T. Hankinson, grocers, Macclesfield—J. S. Swans. borough and R. Freeman, builders, Wisbech—G. Turner, T. Mitchell, and S. Stowell, worsted-spinners, Horton, Yorkshire —W. Humphreys and W. Mowle, tailors, Dover—C. W. Crowdy and T. M. Hammond, surgeons, Brixton—J. F. Moen and L. Ellis, porter-dealers, Chester—E. and H. Brown, c:othes-brokers, Bradford, Yorkshire—B. Carte. and S. Cheet. nam, lace-manufacturers, Nottingham—J. Trotter and B. 'thtellings, general-shopkeepers, Cinderford, Gloucestershire — W. and W. R. Croggon, auctioneers, Angel-court, Throgmor. nni-street—J. J. Southern and Co., cotton-spinners, Ashton. under-Lyne, Lancashire—F. and H. Newto n, gold.miths, Norwich—R. P. and T. Gee, vinegar-makers, Bristol—R. Gil ng and Co., paper-manufacturers, Cheddar, Somersetshire. l" hi JP 60 4 : fro