The Sun. — London, England, 1834-12-03 00:00:00

events, or the manifest signs of the times, can be lost upon them. And it is in a full confidence that such cannot be the case that we continue to exhort the country to wait patiently till the new Administration has been formed, and its views developed, ere any attempts is made to impede the one, or to con demn before-hand the other. There is a remark in Sir William Home's letter to the electors of Maryle bone, which, though it is stated to have been "received with laughter and hisses," by some of the persons who composed the recent meeting of the rate-payers of that extensive and opulent parish, will, we have no doubt, make a very different impression upon the calm good sense of the country:—" I cannot bring myself to think (says Sir W. Horne), that the great Constitutional cause of Reform, after what we have already achieved, is in danger of any attempt which may be meditated by any set of Ministers against it ; and the past con duct of his Majesty seems to me to be a sure guarantee to his subjects that no such scheme would for a mo ment meet with his countenance or support, but that he would instantly, upon its being discovered, concur with his people in defeating it." This is the language of reason and common sense, and though it may not fall in with the views of a few noisy demagogues and their followers, either in Marylebone or else where, we have good reason to know that it speaks the sentiments of by far the larger portion of the com munity of all classes. If enough is not already known to establish the fact, we feel persuaded that whenever the time shall come that the whole particulars shall be developed, it will be found that the King's present position, as well as that of the Duke of Wellington, has been unavoidable and inevitable. That Lord Melbourne's Administration, constituted as it was, on the demise of Earl Spencer, mig ht have lingered on past another quarter• day, greatly to the satisfaction of some of its members, is just possible ; but how the King could with honour suffer it, or such a man as Lord Melbourne submit to it, we cannot in any way imagine. The absence of Sir Robert Peel and the uncertainty of his return are, it must be admitted, un toward circumstances ; at the same time, however, they furnish the best refutation of the alleged concert and pre-arrangement which is said to have existed upon the occasion. That must be a very singular species of pre-arrangement, indeed, which does every thing possible to involve itself in difficulty, delay, and di lemma.—Morning Herald. " Appearances (says The Sun) would seem to justify the rumour that has gained ground during the last few days, intimating that a new election is on the point of taking place. We find the agents and un derstrappers of the Tory Government busily occupied in those preparations, which have always been con sidered symptomatic of a dissolution. This is per haps the surest sign that can be given of the feeling that predominates at head quarters. Another reason that weighs strongly with us, and leads us to believe that a dissolution is at hand, is that the John Bull and other hirelings, have been instructed to say that no such step is in contemplation, and that it would be the best policy to postpone an appeal to the coun try, until the new Ministers have tried the temper of the old Parliament. This is, in all probability, one of those fraudulent practices to which the enemies of the people never scruple to resort, when they wish to throw them off their guard, in order to gain an ad vantage over them." Under these circumstances, in dication unquestionably of an approaching dissolution, we are not aware that we can do better, or more amply fulfil our duty to the country, than quote the following article from an Edinburgh paper. It is pithy and to the point—it is sagacious and determined, and will as suredly not meet with less attention because it comes from the North. "We conjure" says it, " the liberal electors all over the kingdom to be on the alert. Let nothing in the way of preparation be neglected, so that when the time for action arrives, all may be ready to fight the good fight. Much good advice and timely warning have already been given by some of our contem poraries, which, we trust, will not be thrown away. To the people generally, electors and non-electors, we would say—Proceed in giving vent to your indignation --- 1 alarm. Let your voices be raised calmly, but loudly ----ermerimnarely ; imucklnnetia 8 -e, if necessary, be sent to the Throne against the einploymant of those who have hitherto professed opinions in direct opposition to those of the mass of the community. Sir Robert Peel is eminently wary, and if he finds a storm of opposition ready to greet his arrival, he will, in all probability, decline to take a part in the Ministry ; and without Sir Robert Peel, the Tories can do nothing. In that case, even the Duke, the mighty Duke, who never sees any diffi culties in his path, must once more retire to Apsley House to amuse himself in barricading his windows. But if, in spite of the universally expressed opinion of the country, the Tories should proceed in their mad attempt to conduct the Government, why, then, to the electors must we look to settle the dispute. Let the electors return men who, like the Scottish Parliament in Queen Anne's reign, will insist on dis cussing overtures of liberty' before they will listen to overtures of subsidy.' Keep back the subsidy until certain other matters are put on a footing satis factory to the country, and either the necessary reforms will be speedily yielded, or the Tories one and all quickly free Downing-street of their presence. Even the Duke would find the want of a subsidy a serious matter. The Duke, we are told, can do every thing ; but there are two things without which he can, not withstanding, do nothing—namely, the assistance of Sir Robert Peel and the trifling matter of a subsidy. Let the watch-words at the ensuing election therefore be liberty or subsidy.' "—Morning Advertiser. Our readers will see by the report of yesterday's meeting in Covent-garden what the state of revolu tionism and radicalism actually is in Westminster. The scant attendance, the very dirty appearance of the mob, the flatness and dullness of the proceedings, all mark the public feeling too strongly to allow the weakest man alive to be deceived into a notion that the principles of the anarchists are at all in the ascendant. It is not only because the Westminster meeting yes terday in itself was a decided failure—not only a failure but a recoil—that we refer to it. We know enough of a Covent-garden mob and a Guildhall Com mon Council to know that their movements are no more indicative of the feelings of the country, than a speech of Mr. Hume's is a proof of common sense or common intelligence ; but why we delight in having to refer to this most contemptible effort of the school of rotten-cabbageism is because we have had it under our own eyes ; aye, and under our own nose, too. The people of London read in the Radical county papers of Liberal meetings, and revolutionary assemblies, and congregations of thick-stick patriots to the amount of eighty and ninety thousand at a time, who conveniently assemble in some meadow containing two square acres, and they read of enthusiasm and banners, and raw-heads and bloody-bones, and all the paraphernalia of Republicanism, as if the cause were triumphant. Test everything by facts ; judge from what you see rather than from what you hear ; read about Glasgow ; read about Manchester ; read about Bi r mingham—thousands and tens of thousands of brave citizens, with club-sticks, and tenpenny nails driven into their heads ; read about the yells and the groans ; but, having read, pray look at West minster—the most important city, not only in Eng land, but, taking its, wealth and extent together, in the world. See what happens there, or rather here ; for here we luckily are to see it ; and what do you find ? Why, of a vast population, which, from the diversity of interests by which it is actuated, is, perhaps, more deeply and seriously involved in the general welfare of the State than any other, you find two or three hundred of its lowest members, attracted more by curiosity than anything else, assembled to listen to the speeches of certain broken-down practi tioners in that line ; the majority of which mob, small as it is, end the holiday (which being Monday, they most properly keep) by giving three cheers for the Duke of Wellington. We say again " seeing is be- I lieving," and, therefore, th e moral we deduce from I ,pened yesterday is merely this--that people deluded by reports from distant parts of Nib the belief of the existence of a feeling :nowledge and personal experience Is not to be found in Chose places t( . 41.4,it yekr:t4 _ *4914,4ieg i': `.. -' l, • '"-----.•,--;.\ 74,,,, ', 143 0 ;iv 7 w THE SUN, LONDON - , WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1834. where they are able to witness the manifestation oi public opinion.—Morning Post. Public meetings are held from day to day, of which the object is to condemn the forthcoming Administra tion, with regard to which nothing can be known, whatever may be conjectured, beyond the fact that Sir R. Peel is announced by his friends as its predestined Chief. A meeting was convened at Rochester on Mon day, whereat Mr. Bernal, M.P. for that city, attended, as did also Messrs. Hodges and Rider, members for East Kent, all of whom took part in the proceedings. The resolutions adopted were expressive of regret, dis gust, and indignation at the change which has taken place, and of a determination to oppose, by all consti tutional means, the continuance of the apprehended Ministers in office. An address to his Majesty was likewise voted, conformable to the spirit of the resolutions, but in terms certainly more peremp tory than deferential towards the Throne. The Westminster meeting held in Covent-garden yester day was what may be termed a complete failure as to magnitude, and, with very few exceptions, not less so in point of respectability. As to the Marylebone meeting, reported in yesterday's Times, the most pro minent parties were Colonel Evans and Mr. Hume, having for backers Sir F. Knowles, the gentleman who figured on another and recent occasion in the city, and Mr. Wakley, whom we need not trouble ourselves to describe. Mr. Joseph Hume, being at once an economist and a tactician, makes the most of all the materials within his reach. Like his vast prototype Napoleon, he redeems by übiquity the loss of time and the lack of numbers, and shows at once his knowledge of arithmetic and his taste for it, by an endless multi plication of his own person, coining a long speech, moreover from the dross of all political currency. In illustration, however, of the spirit by which some of the personages who honoured the Covent-garden meeting with their presence must have been actuated, we would refer our readers to one resolution whereunto a unanimous assent appears to have been given—viz. that which pledges the parties to a great extension of the suffrage, and the substitution of the ballot for open voting. Now, let us ask how a considerable num ber of those supporters of the late Administration who have shown such furious haste to exchange the fraternal hug with the extreme Radicals, would have voted. in Parliament—nay, how they did vote—when the question of the ballot was submitted to the House of Commons ; and if they would not there vote, and did not vote, for the affirmative of Mr. Grote's motion, or for triennial Parliaments, or for universal suffrage, with what face can they, as honest men, give their assent to such proceedings as those at the meeting in Westminster, at which there was yesterday carried unanimously," for so says the report, a resolution embodying every one of the principles which but a few short months before they negatived as re presentatives of the people ? This is barefaced faction—this is downright political dishonesty ; it is a mixture of trickery and desperation, with which many, we fear, are chargeable, but which the people of England, in their calmer moments, are utterly incapable of supporting. It is that species of dis creditable manoeuvre, that show of false colours, as sumed for purposes of public deception, which must render the alliance of such persons valueless to any government which respects itself, and their services unworthy the acceptance of a wise constituency. It is not by such meetings, or by such means, that any administration can be sensibly injured. As for the meeting of the Finsbury people at White Conduit house, we see nothing remarkable in it, except that Mr. Duncombe had the skill to command the muscles of his countenance, and gravely talk of impeachinL , the Duke of Wellington : while Mr. Hume, with characteristic eloquence, expressed his determination not to give ,‘ a farthing" to the Duke or his Master. These threats are not very alarming. They were pro bably intended merely to amuse the worthy auditors, who must have been sadly fatigued with the general dullness of the proceedings. The assembly were peace able, and went quietly away, some (as an eye witness as sures us) apparently half r.sleep, and the rest manifesting symptoms of considerable lassitude Indeed, it requires no common quantity of energetic wakefulness to resist the soporific distills l ions from_t,- for Middlesex. The Lay Corporation Address was presented yesterday to the King, and was answered by his Majesty in one or two brief sentences, declaratory of his willingness, past and future, to correct abuses, and to improve the condition of his people, as also of his hope that those Ministers to whom he had given his confidence, would act so as to obtain that of the country. An expectation had prevailed, though un fairly, in some quarters, that the Royal answer would be so couched, that inferences might be drawn from it as to the specific policy of the ensuing Cabinet. That would have been no less contrary to precedent, than to reason. It is enough that the spirit of the reply was most favourable to the hope of a conciliatory Admini stration, and of one which would study to deserve the national confidence—a confidence which, it must be obvious to those who counselled such an answer, no Minister can henceforth win who is not determined on carrying out the system of reform.—Times. ROLLS' COURT, DEC. 2. NEDBY V. HAZELDINE AND ANOTHER.-INJUNCTION. A gentleman behind the bar applied for a special injunc tion to restrain the defondants from collecting and getting in the personal estate of a lady named Nedby. The Learned Counsel read affidavits stating that the testator (a lady of the name of Nedby) died some time since at Herne Bay, of cholera ; when on her death-bed, the de fendants, who are builders at Herne Bay, were mentioned to her as proper persons to be appointed as her executors ; and though they were both perfect strangers to her, she immediately consented to their appointment, and they have acted in that capacity since her death. On several occa sions it has been discovered, however, that they have been receiving money on different securities, belonging to the estate of the testator, and applying it to their own private use. The affidavits went on to state other reasons that made the present application necessary. The MASTER of the ROLLS granted the injunction rs prayed. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, DEC. 2. PRADHOMME V. FRASER. In this case, which was not concluded yesterday when we went to press, the Jury, after consulting together for about twenty minutes, returned a verdict for the plaintiff— Damages, Fifty Pounds; but said that the innuendos as to the general statement were not proved, but that those re lating to the anecdote were proved, and that the anecdote referred to , the plaintiff. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, DEc. 2. IN THE RE LONDON BRIDGE ACT.-JUDGMENT. Mr. Baron ALDEasoN, in giving judgment in this case this morning, stated that this was a bill filed for the pur pose of ascertaining whether the trustees, appointed by the New London Bridge Act, were entitled to all reasonable expenses incurred in the valuation of premises, and if they were, out of what fund they were to be paid. He had se riously considered the case, and carefully examined every authority that had been quoted at the bar, and he was quite of opinion that the trustees were entitled to all rea sonable expenses, and to be paid out of the Compensation Fund. Mr. Arundell's " Narrative of his Travels and Dis coveries in Asia Minor," is a most able and entertaining work, to which, says the Dublin University Magazine, we are anxious to pay particular attention, not only because of the merit with which it is executed, or the interest attached to the scenes and countries it describes, but also because the esti mable and talented writer belongs to a class of individuals a ho are engaged in the most noble work that can employ the powers of man—that of bearing the blessings of the Gospel to the dark places of the earth. Mr. Arundell was for many years Chaplain at Smyrna, and, therefore, enjoyed opportu nities possessed by few of prosecuting his inquiries. He made excursions into the interior of this interesting region, and has collected a mass of curious and valuable information. He vi sited the Seven Churches of the Apocalypse, as well as many other places equally connected with sacred and profane his tory. In fact, this is a book which will be appreciated not only by the biblical student, and by the reader who look s f or amusement, but by the devout C hr i st ian, who can, by the author's valuable assistance, trace the travels of St. Paul, and examine the sites where the first great Christian churches were erected. LIVERPOOL COTTON-MARKET, Du,. !d out for some advance upon To-day's demand for Cotton opened with much bustle , but as holders .7.n0 day it caused th e t rue to hold back, and jn consequence sales' the prices of Satur day last quoted, gculators only reach 4,000 bales, at i t nag The have operated merely to the e p x;;nt . of 400 ;v .- " bales. business comp rises only 150 B raz il s ; re mainder America...,, at lid. to 10 d. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HO USE. An elderly gentleman came to the,Justice-room to com plain of a robbery which had been committed upon him in the streets on the preceding day. He had, he said, a good deal of experience of the streets of London, and was up to the manoeuvres which the thieves were daily practising, so that he was rather surprised to find that he was to be num bered amongst the victims. As he was passing down Lud gate-bill he saw a man with what was called a "life-pre server" round his neck, which, upon being filled with air, looked like a large horse-collar, and attracted the eyes of the crowds of passers-by. The man who carried this pre server varied the amusement by letting out the wind at a more violent rate than that at which he blew it in, and the noise produced thereby set the mob in a roar of laughter, and made all genteel people get quickly out of the way, and in the confusion produced by this eccentric performance pockets innumerable were picked. The principal perfor mer was of course the person who exhibited the " bladder cravat," but the thieves, who went on with the by-play, formed the most profitable part of the company, and al though the complainant was aware that that which was said to preserve life was used to pick pockets, he fell some how or other into the crowd, was hustled from one to the other, and robbed of his pocket-book as well as of his poc ket-handkerchief. The LORD MAYOR said it was rathar extraordinary that a gentleman who knew the thieves so well should expose himself to them in a crowd, which was the element of the fraternity. The applicant said he knew that he deserved to lose for the rashness of his conduct, but he thought it to be his duty to endeavour to secure those who had no experience from the danger of such a system. His Lordship directed that the police should watch the movements of the bladder-bearer when he exhibited in the streets. Hannah Sheen,Miaael Sheen, and Elizabeth Regan were brought before the Lord Mayor, charged with having robbed the house of Mr. Dawson, linen-draper, of Bishops gate-street, the master of the first prisoner. The case ex cited much interest. A constable stated that at half-past seven o'clock on the evening of Sunday, the 23d of November, he obser►ed the prisoner Michael Sheen standing near the door of Mr. Dawson's house, and suspected that the young man had a design upon the house. In a short time Michael Sheen walked into the house, the door of which was opened by Harriet Sheen, who proved to be the sister of Michael. Witness kept the door in sight, and in about a quarter of an hour saw Michael come out with a large bundle. Witness said, " What have you got there ?" To which Alichael replied, " Only some things to wash." Witness, convinced that all was wrong, took him into custody, and found upon examination of the bundle that it con tained two blankets and two counterpanes. Michael was then lodged in the Compter, and Mr. Dawson was in formed of the circumstance upon his return from Church. Hannah Sheen was then apprehended, and five pounds in money and two duplicates were found upon her person In her box, in the room in which she slept, were found se veral articles, the property of Mr. Dawson. Michael Sheen having stated that he was taking the bedclothes to the wash at his mother's house, another officer was directed to find out that house and search it. The officer soon found Ellen Regan, the mother of the Sheens, in bed, under which were concealed two boxes containing property of Mr. Dawson's. Mr. Dawson stated that Hannah Sheen had been in his service between three and four months. Hannah Sheen declared that Mr. Dawson was quite mistaken in supposing that the goods were his. She had told him, when about to become his servant that she should be obliged to encumber the house with a quantity of bed clothes and other property, as she had saved a great deal, and she was surprised at being charged with having stolen what was her own property. The LORD MAYOR said that the case was, he was happy to say, a very unusual one. It was but seldom that a whole family were to be found in a conspiracy to plunder a house. The scene disclosed was truly horrible, and he should com mit the mother and two children to take their trial at the Central Criminal Court. GUILDHALL. Yesterday a young man in a smockfrock, who gave the name of John Jones, was brought before Mr. Alderman Bnows, charged with stealing a pheasant, value .51., from an aviary at Mr. Alderman Atkins's seat at Halstead, in Kent. Mr. Alderman Atkins stated that he saw the bird safe on Saturday last, and on Sunday morning he learned that in the course of the previous night two of his aviaries had been broken open and some extraordinary bantams, and the beautiful white pheasant now produced, which had been niplp (4 . presented to his daughter, had been stolen. He lost no _the r ever quarter they might attempt to dispose of their booty, and on Monday afternoon the prisoner was apprehended upon offering to sell the pheasant to Mr. Rosier, a poul terer, in Leadenhall W. Evans, in the service of Mr.. Rosier, stated that the prisoner and another man came up to him and asked if he would buy the pheasant, which the prisoner drew from under his frock. Finding it corresponded with the description of the one stolen from Mr. Alderman Atkins, he amused the men while notice was sent to the Alderman's house, a gen tleman from which came immediately to the market and identified the bird. The two men found an opportunity to start off, and after a sharp chace the prisoner was secured near London Bridge, but his companion escaped. The prisoner's defence was that he knew nothing of the robbery, but was merely carrying the bird for the other man, who was a stranger to him. Mr. Alderman BROWN committed him for trial. HATTON-GARDEN. Yesterday James Lake, a sweep, was summoned before Mr. BENNETT, charged with having in the exercise of his calling called out " Sweep, soot, Oh," in the public street, contrary to the statute. Staples, being sworn, was asked by Mr. BENNETT what he was ? Staples—l am employed by the Society of Master Chimney Sweeps to prosecute these cases. He stated that he heard the defendant call out " Sweep " in Ossulton-street, Somers Town. Mr. BENNETT (to the prisonor)—What have you to say', Prisoner—Vy; I can't say as how I didn't cry. Mr. BENNETT expressed great reluctance to fine him, bui still he had acted contrary to law. He must be awere that he done so. Prisoner—l assures your Vorship I (lid not know the statty. Mr. LAING suggested that it would be better to fine him, and commit him to prison if he did not pay the fine. There were two convictions already unpaid. Mr. BENNETT fined him 2s. 6d. and costs, and as under the circumstances he was disposed to be lenient, he would give him one week to pay the money in. Prisoner—Thank your Vorship ; but I've got no money. Mr. LAING—I can only tell you that if you do not pay the expenses will gradually increase upon you ; and if ever you are brought here again under similar circumstances, and I am the Magistrate, I shall convict you in the highest penalty. I suppose that you are one of those stubborn fellows who know the law and wilfully abuse it. Hall—l have been where the prisoner lives, and every thing in the place would not fetch 3s. if sold, your Worship. The prisoner was then committed in default of payment. John Stocks, another of the sooty tribe, was charged with a similar offence. Clerk—Do you plead guilty or not guilty ? Prisoner— Why, guilty, to be sure. Staples—l have repeatedly cautioned him, but he per. sists in doing it. Prisonerl must do it. I have no other means of get ting my living, and I have got no money. He was fined 2s. 6d. and costs, and told that if he did not pay he would be committed to prison for a week. Prisoner—lt's a werry hard case, and I must go to prison. Clerk—Recollect you will be kept to hard labour. Prisoner—Vell, I can't help it, I'll be kept there. Others were fined in a similar penalty, and told that dis tress warrants would be issued if they did not pay. WORSHIP-STREET. Yesterday a lad about seventeen, named James Parker, a very desperate and expert young thief, was placed at the bar for reexamination before Mr:TWYFORD, charged with the following audacious robbery _:7-- George Kent, a police constable No. 82 of the N divi sion, stated that Thursday evening last he wa s on d uty i n the Hackney-road, and saw the prisoner, whom he knew to be a reputed thief, go and throw up the shop window of Mr. Turner, a glasscutter, No. 14, Goldsmith's-row, and take something out and run away. Witness pursued him and raised a cry of " Stop thief ;" and after a long chase the prisoner was stopped by a foot passenger, but he made a very desperate resistance, and assaulted that person in a very violent manner. The constable produced a glass decanter and sugar basin which the prisoner had in his posi session when stopped, and he believed them to have been taken from Mr. Turner's window. Mr. C. Turner, the prosecutor, identified the property as his, and the prisoner must be a very expert thief, or he could not have effected the robbery in so short a time. Both the articles were worth at least a sovereign. The prisoner said—" Now, your YPrsh?p, you k nows werry yell, that I've been placed in this ere havikward giti. vation before, and it's no use to deny it either ; but, how somedever, yer Honner's Vership, niver mind that, for it hasn't anything, to do with the matter at stake. It is a werry serious Charge, afid is pow preyp ruinous to my karac ter ; and, the r efore, 1 mun defend pe#9lf ag veil Al' I kap ; and if I 4/n 4 ,cqiiitted i that 'ere_pplicerxmn may depend on fit i n i tig y 1 14 0 0 0 : VA this is liCFrevelant l.t it 1.11... f ~. too to the case, and so here goes into it at once. I mean to say that I was running along, being in a hurry, ven I was stopped by a gemman, and taken into kustody, and that 'ere is all I've gotten to say, End I thank yer Vership for yer patience in lisening to me for so long a time." The depositions were taken and read over against the prisoner, and Mr. TWYFORD then fully committed him to Newgate for trial. THAMES- OFFICE. Yesterday, Robert Bristow, fore-cabin steward of the. Royal William Edinburgh steam-ship, and William Richard son, a labourer, were charged with an offence against the Excise Laws, under the 6th of Geo. IV., c. 118, for having in their possession four gallons and a half of whisky with out a permit. Mr. BRODERIP—There is no doubt but the case is clearly made out. The penalty is 1001., but the Magistrates have the power of mitigation to one quarter of that amount. You are, therefore, sentenced to pay a fine of 251. to the King ; or, in default of payment, to three months' impri sonment, the minimum of punishment under the Act. Mr. Mayhew, who attended to prosecute, said he did not intend to press the charge against the prisoner Richardson, who, he considered, was merely the instrument in the hands of the other prisoner. Mr. BRODERIP said that he exercised a very humane and sound discretion, but he cautioned Richardson to be very careful for the future, to ascertain what the loads were which he was employed to carry. Richardson was then discharged. LAMBETH-STREET. Yesterday Mary Brooks, a middle-aged female, was brought up for final examination before Messrs. HARDWICK and WALKER, on a charge of stealing several Bibles and other devotional books from St. Andrew's Scotch Church, in Philpot-street, Stepney. The father and mother of the prisoner, who have always borne a most reputable character, were present, and ex pressed their surprise at the prisoner being guilty of such an act, as she could have no inducement to do so, and they could only account for her conduct, by the fact of her la bouring under imbecility of mind. Several respectable persons, who had known the prisoner for many years, gave her an excellent character, ar d corro borated the statement of her parents, as to her imbecility of mind. The Magistrates on hearing this discharged the prisoner, after a severe admonition ; and a promise on the part of her parents to watch her closely for the future, and prevent a recurrence of such acts. INCENDIARY FIRES AT ROTHERHITHE. The inquiry into the circumstances attending the late in cendiary fires at Rotherhithe, and the several attempts made last week to fire buildings and warehouses in that parish, has been actively proceeded with during the last tw e days, by Mr. Symons, the chief clerk, and Evans, the prin cipal surveyor of Thames Police. Several persons, includ ing those whose premises were destroyed and fired, have been examined, preparatory to another investigation at the Thames Police-office, and some additional evidence, it is said, has been collected against William Palmer, the new policeman, No. 108 R, who was taken into custody on Sa turday morning, and, contrary to established practice, un derwent a secret examination before Mr. Ballantine in a private room, from which reporters and the public were ex cluded. The charge on which Palmer has been committed to Horsemonger-lane Gaol for re-examination on a future day, is " on suspicion of having been concerned in feloni ously and maliciously setting fire to divers houses and build ings m the parish of St. Mary, Rotherhithe." Since Thurs day morning, when a vile attempt was made by some atro cious incendiary to destroy the premises of Messrs. Smith and Pittman, the barge-builders, by firing combustibles in a loft, no other alarm of fire has been given in the parish, but the nightly Association of the inhabitant householders and others, and the extra body of police, still perambulate the parish, to guard against nocturnal incendiarism. The in habitants are greatly dissatisfied that the examination of the policeman was not conducted, as usual, in the public office, in which case they would have been enabled to learn whether there was any further occasion to perambulate the streets for the protection of their pi•operty, and have also ascertained whether the mystery in which the numerous in cendiary fires in Rotherhithe have been enveloped had been cleared up. UNION-HALL. Yesterday James Stagg, a n extra foreman belonging to the London Associated Fire Office, was brought before Mr. MURRAY, charged on suspicion with having set fire to the premises of Messrs. Pittman and Smith, the large builders of Rotherhithe. The investigation excited considerable interest in consequence of the numerous fires which have recently taken place in the neighbourhood, and the office was thronged with parties anxious to hear the result. M6ssrs. Secjacr. tun_. and 'L Mordan the church -wardens of Rotherhithe, to whom much praise is due for their exer tions since the spirit of incendiarism has displayed itself in the parish, were also present during the proceedings. James Evans, principal surveyor of the Thames Police, stated that he was on duty at Rotherhithe on the morning of the 27th of November. About ten o'clock that morning in passing along, his attention was direction toward a part of the wooden pailings belonging to the premises of Messrs. Speck and Redman, opposite those of Messrs. Pittman and Smith. He saw the figures "2k" written in chalk on the part of the pailings mentioned, and the figures wore sur rounded by chalk lines. Some hours had elapsed before be beard of the fire at Messrs. Pitmann's, and he went there, and on the first loft on the premises, in the north east corner, he observed several articles of a, combustible nature, namely, part of a tar barrel, a piece of tarpaulin, several pieces of deal board, also several tree nails and some shavings, all of which appeared to have been on fire. The witness produced the half-consumed remains of the different articles found on the premises. Burridge, the officer, produced some tarpaulin which he found at the prisoner's house, but on comparing it with the piece found on Messrs. Pittman's premises it did not cor respond, the canvas being of a finer texture. Evans, in addition, stated that he knew the prisoner by sight, but did not recollect seeing him on the night of the fire. The prisoner belonged to the fire brigade station e d at Rotherhith e . Th e witness added that he was accom panied, on the night in question, by some of the Thames police-officers. A plan of Messrs. Pitman's premises was shown to Evans, and he said that it was accurate. Thomas Walker, a Thames police-officer, stated that he was doing duty under Mr. Evans on the morning in ques tion, at Rotherhithe. He (Walker) was in company with Dallman. another police surveyor ; heard of the fire at Pittman's about twenty minutes to two o'clock, and has tened down to the ways by the water side, to see that no person escaped in that direction. There was no trace of any person having done so, and he returned again to Dall mann, who was waiting for him in front of Mr. Stokes's premises, and gave him his report to that effect. In reply to Mr. MURRAY the witness said that he knew the prisoner, and that he saw him on two or three occa sions during the night mentioned. Saw him afterwards on the premises after the fire was extinguished. There were others with him at the time, and he was exhibiting part of a tar-barrel which had been on fire, and said that he had smothered the flame by putting the tails of his coat over it. R. Dallman,police-surveyor, confirmed the last witness's testimony ; and in addition said that he passed Mr. Pitt - - - - man's premises previously to the fire breaking out, and a policeman on duty near the spot called out " All's well," and he (witness) went forward. He heard of the fire at about three o'clock, and when he went there he sent round Walker to examine and see that no person escaped by the water side ; and he came back and reported that no one had, saying that marks would have been visible in the mud, the tide being considerably down at the time. The witness, in reply to Mr. Murray, said that he knew nothing more tending to throw any light as to the origin of the fire. He did not recollect seeing the prisoner on the night of the fire. Burridge, the officer, stated that he went, accompanied by Smithers, to apprehend the prisoner, which they effected on the preceding evening, near the Spread Eagle, at Bother hithe. The prisoner, on being taken into custody, said— " This is a rum start," adding, " That he supposed his ap prehension arose from what had taken place at the work house on his examination there, and that there were so many persons putting questions to him that he became con fused, and knew not what he did say on that occasion." He further said, " That the story he had told about seeing a man go aft in a boat from the premises was related by Jen kins to him." The prisoner, in reply to the Magistrates, said that he had no questions to ask Burridge, his statement being per fectly correct. Evans was recalled, and, in reply to Mr. Murray, he said that a sewer ran into the Thames, at the rear of Pittman's premises. The tide was half ebb at the time, so that no person could go from thence to a boat on the river, with out 'Ming' footmarks in the mud, There were no signs of footmarks. Smithers, the officer, confirmed Burridge's evidence with respect to the words he used when taken into custody. The officer also produced a pocket-book taken from the prisoner, the papers and memorandums in which Mr. Murray exa mined minutely. M r . Wm. Hartnee stated that he was patrollingliother bithil- en die - night in question with some other ientlemen, w hom he named, and recollected having seen the figures 21 written on a piece of the palings opposite Mr. Pittman's prem i se s (the fire broke out about half-past two o'clock). While w:tness was standing near the end of 1 ! ) W t , 111 ..1 4 -0ii, be q.r.4 th 9 *PP ran to thV'e'fithuice of , Wle§srs. Pittin4th; premises, and from thence to the water side, ppm whepce he could distinguish the reflection of the fire in the middle loft. He ran up a ladder leading to the trap door, followed by Mr. Crestall, and succeeded in forcing it, open with a small crow-bar and a capstan-bar. On enter ing the loft they saw the place on fire at the further end. They proceeded to extinguish the flames, assisted in their exertions by Mr. Ransom, and afterwards discovered that a tar-barrel, or tarpaulin, some pieces of wood, and other in flammable materials, had been the articles on fire. The whole of the materials were placed in such a manner as to leave no doubt it was the work of an incendiary. In reply to the Magistrate, the witness said that be saw the prisoner with others on the night in question previously to the fire, and he recollected him saying, that he thought the Fire Company ought to allow their foremen to patrol the streets without their uniform, and in plain clothes. Did not recollect seeing any firemen in the loft until after the fire was extinguished. Mr. Crestall confirmed the evidence of the last witness n all its material points, and, in answer to the Magistrate, he said that he saw the prisoner a little before two o'clock on the morning in question with Jenkins, going towards the Surrey canal. He afterwards saw the prisoner in the loft after the fire was extinguished. Mr. William Ransom's evidence was not material, only as corroborative of some portion of the foregoing. Edward Riley, a policeman of the R division, stated that he had known the prisoner about fifteen months ; that upon one occasion, while he was on duty at Rotherhithe, he overheard the prisoner say to another man that he was - sorry there were not more fires than there were in Rotherhithe. Mr. MunnAY . —To whom did he address those words ? Policeman—To a man named Jones. It was on the Ro therhithe-wall, and I was passing them at the time. Mr. MURRAY—Did you mention it to any person ? Po liceman—l told it to No. 58 about three months since. Mr. MURRAY-Why did you not mention it to your in spector? The policeman, in reply, said that he did not mention it to any of his superior officers at the time, as he treated the expressions lightly, there being no fires at the time about Rotherhithe. He, however, told inspector Raw ley three days ago of the circumstance. Inspector Rawley, who was absent when the policeman made the above statement, was sent for, and in reply to Mr. MURRAY, he confirmed Riley's account as to the words he heard the prisoner utter. Policeman 58, of the same division, stated that he recol lected Riley having told him, about three months ago, of the words attributed to the prisoner. In reply to the Magistrate, it was stated that the mate rials found in the loft appeared to have been burning about ten minutes before the fire was discovered. Mr. Taylor, the second clerk of this office, gave evidence as to his having heard the prisoner, when applying for a fire summons, say that he saw a man in a boat push off from Mr. Pittman's premises, and pull down the river. The prisoner's deposition, taken at the workhouse on Thursday last, was read, in which he stated that it was a man named Jenkins who told him that he had seen a man push off in a boat from Messrs. Pittman's premises on the morning of the fire. Jenkins was called, and he denied that he had ever made any such statement to the accused. A witness named Matthews stated that he was present in the company of the last witness on the morning of the fires, and heard a policeman make the remark with regard to the boat attributed to the prisoner. Riley was recalled, And in answer to a question he said that he had been two years and a half in the public force. The prisoner said that he was one of the first who assisted in extinguishing the fire, and that in his hurry to get there he fell over several pieces of wood which were lying in his way. He denied ever having used the words attributed to him by the policeman, and said that it was all false, and that he was quite innocent of the offence with which he was charged. Mr. MURRAY said that it was necessary for the ends of public justice to remand the prisoner, and this step would also be best for him, and give a farther opportunity of pro ducing such testimony as would have the effect of clearing his character from the charge. The prisoner was accordingly remanded for a week. LONDON SESSIONS.-TUESDAY, DEC. 2. Yesterday the Sessions were continued at Guildhall, before the Recorder and a Bench of Aldermen. There were several paltry cases of assault. The following was the only case worth noticing : William Hines, a sturdy beggar, aged about twenty-two, was indicted for having violently assaulted one of the ser vants of the Mendicity Society. The prosecutor's statement was to the following effect : He had been directed to clear the street of those worst of nuisances, the able idle begging population. The defendant was particularly distinguished amongst that troublesome fraternity, and was in the habit of adding the argument of threats to solicitations. One day when Hines was begging, as ;ard'asTie m Chancery-lane, the defendant went up to him and asked him to go to Red Lion-square (the Mendicity Society) for relief. The defendant rejected the invitation with great contempt. " Why won't you go ?" said the prosecutor. " Because they want me to work for my wittles" said the defendant, " and I'm blowed if I stand that nonsense." The prosecutor's object in asking the beggar to go to Red Lion-square was, that if he were really destitute, he might receive relief at that place. Finding that the defendant was an incorrigible ruffian, he told him that he must go to the compter, and exhibited his staff of office. The defendant, however, disregarded the authority of the prosecutor, and most violently attacked him, but the fellow was soon apprehended, and dragged, powerful as he was, to prison. A very solemn looking witness then stepped forward and said, " Please your vorships, I was a walking along when I sees this here beggarman rise up his leg and kick this here gentleman, and this gentleman said nowt a word but What's that ere for, young man ? ' With that, this here prisoner or beggarman, or votever you please to call him, does no more but he pitches into this here gentleman as be longs tq the Begging Society, and kept a striking of him in a unproper manner." The RECORDER—What degree of force did the defend ant use ? Witness—l can't say exactly as the degrees was any way in particular, but I should'nt like for to give or take 'em. They could'nt do good to nobody. The RECORDER—WeII, prisoner, what have you to say to this? Defendant—Vy, my Lord, it was the first time I ever begged, and I never meant for to do it again, for it is a poor thing to live by, let people say what they will; so I jist stood in the street when this man came up, and he wanted to lug me up to Red Lion-square. " No thank you, Sir," says I, for they'll work a man for six or eight hours as hard as a horse, and then they'll give him a pennoth of bread and a cup of what they call soup, but what I calls bone water ;" so when I hesitated about it oat he pulls his staff, and he makes a wipe of it at me, but I vould'nt have it, and you vould'nt blame me for that ; so I catches his harm and down we comes together, and this sober body comes up ; so here I'm sarved out between 'ern. The RECORDER, in addressing the Jury, said that any body might apprehend a prisoner begging in the streets. The Jury found the defendant Guilty. The RECORDER—Prisoner, the Court i s o f o pi n i on t h at you are one of those violent ruffians who go about under pretence of begging, and that you ought to be restrained. The sentence of the Court upon you is that you be impri soned for three months. Defendant (leaving the Court)—Here's a pretty go ; sent to quod because I don't like the soup-shop in Red Lion Square. CRUEL CASE OF SEDUCTION. A case of gross seduction came before the borough Ma gistrates at Grantham in the early part of last week, which involved a creditable young woman in great difficulties and peril. It appeared by her statement that a man named Maitland had induced her to marry him, and in order to make it appear to her that he was of good family connexions, he produced a sheet of paper with a seal in the margin as large as a crown piece, purporting to be an extract from a will which enabled him to provide for a wife ; and to make this document appear genuine, he forged the name of a so licitor of eminence at Grantham, to certify its being a true extract, and that he was the son of a clergyman. The of fender brought the young woman down on foot from Lon don, and on the road disposed of all her clothes except what she had on. He proceeded with her to a village about a mile from Grantham, and left her there, whilst he went on, as he alleged, to his father, the clergyman, to inform him of the marriage. He stated that he resided at a place within five miles of Lincoln ; and he desired her to wait for three days, and if he did not then return to her, she was to follow him. The poor girl went in search of him and his father, but could find neither, though, to her ex treme distress, she discovered he had a wife living not far from Lincoln, whom he married in June, 1827, and had then two children by her. The p oor g i r l made the best of her way back to Grantham, and called on the solicitor whose name was forged to the pretended extract, and who kindly entertained her case but the marriage having taken place in Surrey on the 16th of August last, the Magistrates of Grantham could not take her complaint with proper ef fect ; they, however, stated that they would render every assistance in getting the man brought to % Voice after she had laid her complaint i p right quarter. The young wonlau wbiln 411 e 041110 back had not 'a sixpence in her pocket nor a place to go to, and was 140 miles from her home. The Alderman (John Brooks, Esq.), the rest the justices, and the town-clerk, entered ipte for getting her home, and sgpt op@ ofthU sergeautp-is , _ rnace roypil to tieveral ptuions, who subserib.3 • also, so that in a few ours she had sufficient'o take her comfortably by the coach to her friends. sinco gho has returned home, she has sent a lett er to _i tbt Wil-vicrk ; couched n very feeling and grateful terms, thanking all her friends at Gra!itha: for the relief she received as a stranger upon so trying occasion. —Stanford Mercury. THE EAST INDIA COMPANY'S MARITIgt SERVICE. of Yesterday a mee ti ng of the commanders and office rs i d the East India Company's late maritime service, was at the Jerusalem Coffee-house, for the purpose of laying ue ; fore the officers th e report of the committee appointed I. watch over the int eres t s o f tLe service, and to obta in higher rate of comp ensat i on t h an t h at propose d by ,: Court of Directors of the East India Company. CaP tal f Hinde took the Chair, an d b a yi ng opene d t h e b u siness ° the day the report of the committee was read.' The report referred to the exertions that had been mane by the committee to obt a i n a compensation for the maritime e officers for losses whi c h th e service had sustained by t, cessation of the East Indi a Company's trade. It 8 11 ° 1 e 0 to the many interviews th e comm itt ee h a d h a d with ` .l Board of Control to obtain the object in view. After gol f through the whole of th e proceedings before the Court u; Proprietors of East I n di a St oc k, t he comm i t t ee return,e 4 _ thanks to those who h a d f orwar d e d th e i r cause , and to 0° press, which the report states, " with a kindness that na" not be appreciated by the service, had afforded it their n a p: deviating support by co ns t an tly g i v i ng op i n i ons emine,2 t favourable to their inter es t s ." Th e repor t reg retted On the subscriptions to sustain the unavoidable ex pences curred for promoting the i n t eres t s o f th e serv i c e had b ee much below what the committee had a right to expect' The report was unanimously adopted, and the followl7, resolution was proposed :—" That this meeting acit n° ,,'' ledge with pride and gratitude th e serv i ces of the o : er mittee in establishing the important fact of every ( 46 ' , being actually the servant of th e H on . E as t India CI pany, whether afloat or ashore, from th e d a t e o f his al 3 r 3i ; ment ;—for having strenuously urged, and judiciously e t forced, the amendment of the 7th section of the Indian -A c ,; whereby the claims of all pers on s are t o b e cons idered ' ll °_, or heretofore employed by or under the said comParlY L i for their zeal and ability in seconding the character ;i s merits of the service, and its just claim to reward• meeting have, however, to deplore, and to express tbeir re gret and disappointment, that the committee should b submitted a proposition to exclude the old members of y 5, service, whose laurels the junior officers were proud tr ) ,„i e play for the common good, thus abandoning the prio'L r upon which the committee was formed, and sacrificing fr or brother officers who had not been able to obtain recente.,, ployment, thereby entailing additional injury, and a fforg!" just grounds for withholding unqualified praise." After some discussion this resol u ti on was ne gatived , 811 . 1 c 1 a vote of thanks was passed t o C a pt a i n Hi n de, CO* Probyn, and the committee, for thei r exer ti o ns on be y of the service. 0 0, The committee were authoriz e d t o w a t c h th e proceei 16 in Parliament during the passi ng o f th e ac t l ega lizing' t e l lt , scale of compensation which has been agreed to by th e neral Court of Proprietors of India Stock. The meeting then adjourned. SPURIOUS TEA. The following appears in a note in the number of '," e ; Quarterly Review just p u bli s h e d :—" Th e ev il conseqeen:iv which we had predicted (says the writer) have e l i . re- t he begun to show them se l ves . Th e most respectable °`, re bong merchants have re ti re d f rom b us i ness, and the r es3 ble either unable or unwilling to advance a shilling to e° iv, the poor cultivators of tea to prepare the usual s u , n r,;; though 40,000 tons of shipping were expected at Col: a y but we shall, notwithstanding, have some tea, and it well that our readers should know what sort of tea i t 0 . he. Our information is from an eye-witness of o r tio tionable authority, recently arrived in England from .fl e e On the opposite side of the river too, and at a short &t il ed from Canton, i s a manu f actory f or converting tht:no worst kind of coarse bl ac k t ea i nto green —i t i s well t" - t eci in Canton by the name of wo-ping, and was always reJ e il to by the agents of the East India Company. The P lan ::01 1 stir it about on iron plates moderately heated, mixing'," II with a composition of turmeric, indigo, and white l ev y which process it ac q ui res th a t bl ue o f plums, and that e r r i e ' e p appearance, which are supp ose d t o i n di ca t e th e fine g. Ite teas. Our informant says that there can be no ou st d :ot respecting the white lead, as the Chinese supirio ten a lle called it by its common nam e , y uen lun. At th e ;by time it is right to state that pulverized gypsum (kn °%. f• '' tbe the name of shetk ao ) i s un d erstoo d b y t h e gent l e men ° we late factory to be employed to subdue a too intense re i colour given by th e i n di go . Th ere were a l rea dy Prey when this vi s it t oo k p l ace 50 , 000 c h ests o f this P r i T og - est article, just enough f or th ree cargoes of the very ',.; e tor 4 ships of the East I n di a Company. The crafty PTO:, n ot told our friend and th e o th er v i s i ters t h at t hi s tel l w— o ball , for the Engli s h, b u t th e A mer i can market • hot, w r e e c ulars no doubt, have our f u ll s h are o f it. Nay, - 80% 0 P ai3 babl e lately published i n th e newspapers render it highly P r h ° that the importation of the well-doctored wo-Pi n g ready commenced." MARKET INTELLIGENCE. COUNTRY CORN MARKETS. yea _,,,, __---;. W heat. Barley. Oats. lie" 3 ' ...'" ..- i -...-.. .., l'er 2 giarter. 8. to S. S. to S. R. to a. 1 M. to 8. , ...... .... Roston.... ........«. 38 43 :54 32 18 P 4 ,33 4. ~ ....- / Gainsborough — 41 al - - . ' , Grantham .. -- -- Grimsby ~ , ..... ... Horn Lincoln 3l 42 IWS 36 20 t'.B 36 4 , 0‘ -- ... Si IA) 0 18 32 ` ... ..0 Stamford 33 :19 528 34 20 in 41 :-- York 46 56 i 24 30 15 20 23 ~- ol'>' l3 Non 4o tv , '" 5 :() I 1 II a 104 17 0 1 4 " 01. Per ~ , 01 154. ed. to , 0.1 11%. tels . e d. 5.1 pd. t° IRISH MARKETS. DUBLIN ➢IARKET NOTE for the WEEK 1 .F 7 0n1 0 c;1 1." 0 111 U 11 9 11 0 13 0 110 (1 15 0 5 0 17 0 10 0 15 1,118 Wheat, per harm] '2O stone 187 Bere l6 stone 784 Barley 3,4 6 Oats 12.; 8-t Flour, per cwt 1,051 Oatmeal H stone Sold to Bakers only. 9,805 Cwt. Flour Average price of Wheat and 1 Receipts of Flour, 14,387 5 Firsts Sales of Do. 12 :ISS ) Sec . ends t. ' Tntrds I 11 0 !lour 35, from from from PRICE OF BREAD. Quartern Loaf 7d. 1 Half Quartern ...... 3td, CLONMELL MA '', t o 0 aj s ' — a Hides (raw) .......... P. , 9 Bacon Pigs ...•..••. $ 0 - Heads .................. 17 - 0 Bag. g Flour, Thirds ....... :20 0 13 Fourths...... 12 ;mei. 10 Barley ...... 11 6 $ Coals ...................... U 0 5 0 .tone. I 'Fallow (rough) ...... 4 Potatoes ...... ...... 0 -. 0 'ound. 0 51 4 ' IMutton ................ Veal... ................. 4 K ETS Nov. 28. Cwt cd. s. .1. New Butter 72 0 to 73 0 Oatmeal 0 11 6 ‘Cendered Lard 0 31 0 Pcr Flour, Second 0 2S 0 Household, I) 26 0 ; Per ] Rapeseed 20 0 Here 0 11 0 l'er Wheat OII 1 2 Cats 0 0 1) 10 Per I 09 1 0 0 4f 0 6 Fresh Butter—, Beef 5" 11 B l e A ef it (p K e E , i r b S : ......... s. 4P" 0 CS. 6 Mutton ............. 0 I) , 6 Pork ...................... I ,' 0 Veal .. ... .......... 1 1 n ' 6 fresh But ter .. v Salt Ditto ..... .... 0 5 0 Potatoes (per ° 3 KILKENNY Wheat (perbarrel) 19s lid. to 20s. Od. Barley Oats Flour iper bag) Butter (percwt.) 72 0 25 0 Bacon Pigs 22 0 25 0 Coals 1 0 1 1 SCOTCH MARKETS. . 03. HADDINGFON CORN MARKET.-- I ' 4o/ " " Wheat. "Lirley. oats. 1 pease. First .... 49, Od . 32s fi d 22, 3,4 27s OA Second 4ls Od 25s Od t.'o, o 26s n to. Third :gs 0.1 23s Od 18. Ott I —SA 7., There were 428 qrs. of Wh ea t i n mat k et , 422 wh i vo. ' 6 Unsold --O Grey • 21. ls. 6d, 13e 3 }:i ,1 4 0,1 „o ' l4' A v orage 8 12thsi —Nov. 21 Pelt cerise. 34 0 . 1 24- Od • 23 1; , CO MEETINGS OF CREDITORS AT TIL 6 rIVV. BASINGHALL-STREET, TO-MORR" !; 0A LKEIT; Wheat. sls cm 40s 0I 3ls al CORN MARKET. First Second ley. oars. Od 23s 81 c Od 21s 8d 0(1 , :7s 4d 'I bird (From the London Gazette) S. Solnmonson, bill-broker, Union-court, Broad-street M. Caldwell, merchant, Austin-friars ....................... .... Of BIRTH. rcl•T' vo, On the Ist inst., in Regent-square, the wife of E dw3 Esq., of a daughter. O .' MARRIED. On the 2d inst., at Croydon Church, John S. Greg° ll ,,', ~ , ,o , of Bedford-square, to Lucy, daughter of Thomas 13acon,gr(c104-iii.. On the 2d inst., at St. John's, Holloway, Henry F. f 1). 11 : " 1 Esq., of Ironmonger-lane and Kennington, only 50n,,0, picl.l'' chardson, Esq., of Walworth, t o Harriet, daughter of_i__ Esq., of Horusey-lane, Highgate. Vic e ' DIED. if , of of ifie On the 30th ult., at Ipswich, Eliza Herbe rt, w ~,rt, Admiral Page, and only child of Governor John W ry' liii ii , East India Company's Service. f ,q., On the Ist inst., at Southend, Kent, John Fo rster, 418 83d year. A On the Ist i ns t., at Kentish-town, in his 72d year,B,olirbor‘fil,ee.,,l,lti. Underwood, mny years resident of Great Turnstile, rha s. n.;,4. On th . : l4th ult., at St. Mary's, Scilly Islands, 3lr• `" 5 a goAv ^ ':.y son of the late M. Budd, Esq., of Petersfieldt . a l ,. f t en"' On the 30th ult., Harriet, wife of William Englon, '"67, hill, Camberwell. ea tig On the 25th inst., at Brompton , Joh n Drake, Es l" .---VtlArdo London : Printed and Published by MURDO - at The Sitm 02144 Kik 112, Strom& 1 1 E 1 ` r d to 'f t o' ,„ /t 1 11 W o , k ,k 1 , i,, di s , -11 } o A/r. 4, , Nt t o tr, N ot s e,, l ' h m tir I y tn k o p•, „ 1 %/ii C, 1 '.44t. S' • hc %110.,•i44(' tlti_e tL rlit i s - kr: n t:k„,e9ll t. 1) .' ,1 1•1, 7 1 t 4l '4 l , t 1 1 111 1 4 Pli dis eat , %tile e t `.• s. Rr ,l D e a r s At N 4 11 th. • it tir , te r a ys, 41"' vc T, c. . li t +ki t At 11. `4! o ff , , tti or ` 4 ! f t}i; e r kl • 'tle T tit itt li~ 4 :ed tZ I ,07: 01 !!te' t ql? Y v ; e a '4O) 4„ r r„Ssi,. 4 . Li g tree 1 4 4%17' tt, t ill hks Quartern Loaf 7d. I Half Quartern ...... 33413..........,.., ' 0( 1. CORK MA RKETS.—Nov. 29. 13. _ oa. 0,, 0 Wheat (per 205t.)...155. Od. tot23i. Od.l Oats (per 14st.) .i.... ...,• 0 Jo Barley (per 16st.) ... 8 0 1.3 0 I Flour (per cwt ).... _ ,J Oatmeal (per cwt.) I Is. Od. to Ws. tfaL A _ Beef, sd. to (id. • Mutton, sd. to 6d. ; Veal, 6d. t , ' T T, I'ork, 2d. to 441. ; Fresh Butter, 10d. to 12d. per "- PRICE OF Burma. To the Merchants. First Quality ° :5 6.1 Second 1 bird Fourth Fifth Sixth