The Sun. — London, England, 1834-11-01 00:00:00

admission of the former services of Lord Brougham. Can Lord Durham really believe that Lord Brougham has any other object in view than himself, namely, the good of their common country ? Lord Brougham has devoted his whole life, now within fifteen years of the extent which the Psalmist assigns to the days of man, to the great cause of improve ment. What motive could be sufficiently powerful to induce Lord Brougham to renounce all that entitles him to his well-earned reputation ? He is not an avaricious man—we have never once heard him ac cused of selfishness, in the vulgar sense of the word. He is only covetous of praise—the weakness of noble minds. Were he to rank himself among the enemies of reform and improvement, an universal expression of detestation would greet him. Does Lord Durham think that Lord Brougham is not himself aware of this ? It is impossible that Lord Brougham can be a traitor to the cause of the people. Allowing that Lord Brougham, like other people, has his failings— nay, that he may have erred in the views he has taken of certain measures—that he may have, in the irrita tion of the moment, said occasionally what might have been as well unsaid—we see nothing in all this to warrant the public in forfeiting their confidence in him as a statesman. We see, on the other hand, great dangers to the cause of reform itself from the continuance of strife between the two noble Lords. We do not justify the article in the Edin burgh Review : we sincerely think that the insinua tions against Lord Durham would have been better omitted. But let the matter rest. No man conceives that Lord Durham was not anxious to obtain an effective reform ; and we are sure that his Lordship, if he reflects seriously on the subject, must be aware that Lord Brougham must be equally anxious with himself to obtain the reform of all recognised abuses. The subject of dispute between them at the Edinburgh dinner, if carefully analyzed, was, after all, more verbal than real. Let it be shown that there has been any unwillingness in Lord Brougham to con cur in the remedying of any great recognised abuse, and we will then believe that the.difference between the noble Lords is serious. We confess we are utterly at a loss to understand the delight which some of our liberal contemporaries (we speak not of the Times— its motives are understood) take in decrying Lord Brougham. Were he a traitor to the people—were he become so desperate as to use the power he has ac quired in hostility to the people—we could understand the rancour with which some of them seek to destroy his reputation. These pretended friends of liberal measures are by no means serving their cause. We maintain that this disposition to overlook the great and brilliant services of Henry Brougham, and to fasten on his weaknesses, has a tendency to impair, in public men, the wish to benefit a people so easily turned about by every wind—and ready one moment to stab the reputation of him who, the moment before, was an idol.—Morning Chronicle. The Edinburgh and Glasgow Reform Dinners have not connected the pleasures of the social board with the promotion of unity and good feeling among re formers. Instead of the Goddess of Concord, crowned with her olive wreath; the ghaStly Alecto herself seems to have presided over those pugnacious " gather ings," where the sparkling wine inspires such bitter ness of feeling as might emanate' from an infusion of political wormwood—where the banquet-hall is con verted into the gladiatorial arena, and the toast and the song are the prelude to the struggles of ambitious conflict, and the wordy war of oratorical extermination. At the Edinburgh dinner the banners of the Brougham and Durham warfare were first openly unfurled. From the moment when that Cabinet intrigue was consum mated which compelled the resignation of Earl Grey, until that festival, so unlucky to the Whigs, there was no doubt a suppressed ill feeling on both sides which did not find a tongue before. It was then seen that the accusations made against Lord Brougham by Earl Grey's friends and partisans, if they had not the open support, had, at least, the secret approbation of Lord Grey and his family. Were it otherwise, most assuredly the late Premier would have taken that op portunity to have disabused the public mind of the im putations publicly and repeatedly cast upon the Lord Chancellor. He did not do so. On the contrary, his conduct is described as being marked with that cold and repulsive civility, which indicates a great change from the feelings of intimate and cherished friendship, and which was an ungratful return for the florid and apparently fervent eulogium with which the Lord Chancellor smoothed the path of his departure from public life, if he believed that his regret was un affected and his sentiments of veneration sincere. For our own part, we cannot help thinking, and we ex pressed that opinion before, that Lord Grey would have acted a part more consistent with high-minded principle and manliness of character, had he openly stated his reasons for changing his opinion of Lord Brougham. We say the same of Lord Durham, who certainly has not, in this matter, acted with the candour or the courage for which he wishes the public to give him eredit. He has shown himself " Willing to wound, but vet afraid to strike." At the Edinburgh dinner, his attack on Lord Brougham was not, avowedly, connected with any sense of.resentment for a Cabinet intrigue or a fa mily quarrel. He attacked only the " clipping and compromising principles" which the Lord Chan cellor had acknowledged. We cannot help suspecting however that an attack made under such circumstances was rather inspired by a feeling of private spleen, than by any enthusiastic anxiety for the public good. At the Glas gow dinner, indeed, he has in a more direct and explicit manner assailed the Lord Chancellor, but not with re gard to the circumstances which led to the secession of Lord Grey. It is said, indeed, that when he de scribed Lord Melbourne as incapable of treachery and intrigue, he meant to imply that another person was capable of both ; but this appears to us another in stance of the want of candour and courage which we have before described. It is insinuating away a man's reputation without daring to make any open and manly accusation against his character. We are not the apo logists, much less the flatterers of Lord Brougham. We have freely enough, but we hope with decency, also censured those parts of his public conduct which we thought prejudicial to the public interests, and in consistent with the principles which he had 'been in the habit of professing, or for which the public had long given him credit. We have spoken of the part which he acted in reference to the Malthusian Poor Law Bill in terms of unequivocal con demnation. We have censured, in the language which such an undignified course of proceeding deserved, his hunting popularity by making a cir cuit of itinerant oratory through the kingdom, while wearing the robes of the exalted station of Lord Chancellor. Nor less did we reprobate the "do little" and " do less" principle of Government which he has recently avowed. Still we cannot forget that the public cause stands infinitely more indebted to his former services than it ever was to those of Lord Dur ham, or, perhaps, ever can be. It is very possible that but for the energetic efforts of Lord Brougham in the House of Commons, when he was the life of his party, the moderate talents of Lord Durham could never have achieved any great celebrity. Again, Lord Brougham, though his conduct has often been severely animadverted on by the Press, never attempted to bridle its freedom by availing himself of the advantage which the indefensible law of libel gives to a prosecu tor. Not so Lord Durham : he has practically tried that which Lord Brougham has only theoretically ap proved—the silencing the freedom of the Press by rri minal information. We were disposed to believe that he was sorry for such acts of illiberality and intole rance, so unworthy the generous character and con scious integrity of the true patriot, but we observe that at the Glasgow dinner he betrays no symptoms of peni tence on this head. He says he has never deviated from the principles which he now professes. If he can look back upon the whole of his political life with ap probation, of course he must approve of his abortive criminal information in the King's Bench, and his other proceedings against the Press. Want of space prevents us from going further at present into the pro ceedings of the Glasgow dinner and the speeches of Lord Durham, but we will return to the subject. — Morning Herald. whole affair passed off, as we think, in a manner, if not positively creditable to the parties,' at least com paratively creditable—creditable, that is, by compari son with the Whig Dinner at Edinburgh. The Radical hosts of Glasgow did not devour all the viands before the entrance of their guest, and if arty indecency were committed, it was indecency in some deference to the rules of subordination and decorum ; the artizans and weavers who had paid half a guinea for their din ner and their fun had command enough over themselves to seem to be sober, until the noble Earl whom they entertained gave them the signal that such restraint was no longer necessary. So far we must applaud the Glasgow Dinner. Our report of this Festival is taken from the Times, for by an accident which we scarcely regret, the express of that Journal outstripped our own, and we think it right and fair, since our contem porary enters into the spirit of the thing more fully than we could be expected to do, that his accounts should have the preference to our own more tardy communication from the scene of action. We thus guard ourselves from the imputation of any failure of justice to Lord Durham, of whose numerous speeches we have not omitted a single word. His Lord ship spoke often and long, and we must at the outset do him the justice to say (whatever may be our opi nion of the purpose to which he spoke), that most of what he said was to the purpose. We do not stop to describe the processions and the flags: Georgeous processions there were, however, and flags sufficiently various and gay. But the one flag with which the name of Lord Durham is inseparably allied was want ing. These Glasgow bodies are discreet. They did not wish to revive either revolutionary or judicial re collections, and, therefore, the tri-colour was absent. The few reflecting people who were present remarked this, and their thoughts reverted, accordingly, to the barricades de Paris, and the King's Bench at West minster. Lord Durham certainly hit the Lord Chan cellor very hard, and the Noble and Learned Lord will scarcely thank us for the fulness or the fidelity of our report. But Lord Brougham is not a man to re main long in Lord Durham's debt ; and we promise the Noble and Learned Lord that whenever lie re plies, we shall give the very best report of his speech that we can procure. It is difficult to guess in what shape this reply may meet us. We may have it in a Penny Magazine. We may have it in an Evening Paper. We may have it—for the Noble and Learned Lord is not fastidious—in some evening speech to a Mechanics' Institute. We may, for what we know— for the Noble and Learned Lord is eccentric enough even for this—in the middle of a Chancery judgment. But, come in what shape it may, Lord Brougham's reply to Lord Durham shall not be neglected. Lord Brougham may fairly be said to divide with Lord Durham the honours of the Glasgow Festival. Who would have cared about what was going to be done or said at Glasgow had it not been for the expectation that, as Lord ) - 3iougham had taken every opportunity within his reach of saying what he thinks of Lord Durham, Lord Durham would avail himself of this very favourable opportunity to say what he thinks of Lord Brougham ? We declare we do not know at this moment which of the two has the better title to be considered as the hero of the day. The certainty that Lord Durham would speak truth of one who had already spoken truth of him was an attraction not to be resisted, especially as truth is so rarely spoken in this world, and most rarely of all by Whi g and Radical Lords, learned or unlearned. Lord Durham, it must be acknowledged, did not disappoint his audience. They had their full half guinea's-worth of jest, sarcasm, and well-merited reproach. Lord Durham and Lord Brougham know each other thoroughly. They have been intimate as sociates in opposition to the Government ; they have been confederates in coups d'etat ; they have been co conspirators in revolutionary movements ; they have been colleagues in Administration. That they hate and despise each other is a fact which can no longer be disputed. But it is more than an indisputable fact. It is a natural result of the relative positions in which they have stood. Conflicting interests, personal enmity, account for their now speaking truth of each other, but do not create the truth which they severally speak. It must already have appeared how extremely impartial we are between Lord Durham and Lord Brougham. We are quite unable, we sincerely declare, to assign to either a preference over the other, whether in temper, in manners, or in principles. If, as Lord Durham truly says, the Lord Chancellor ridicules the majority of the House of Lords at one time, and flatters it at another, does not Lord Durham himself at one time declaim in favour of the liberty of the Press, and at another time perse cute the Press ? Lord Durham does not think Reform has gone far enough. Lord Brougham is of opinion that it has. The difference is easily explained. Lord Durham is not Lord Chancellor. He has no place from things as they are of 15,0001. a year. He has no retiring pension of 5,000/. a year to look forward to. He owes nothing to Reform as it now stands. The Reformed Parliament has added no thousand a year to his future income, after political life shall have become wearisome, or political power shall have departed. Hence it is that while Lord Brougham thinks Reform has gone far enough, Lord Durham thinks it should go a great deal farther ; that while the former believes it is quite time for him to becorhe as good a Conser vative as a Revolutionary Minister can ever be, the latter is still a thorough-going Radical, a Radical notwithstanding the title of Nobility of which he is so proud, and the princely revenue which has placed him in the position, for which nature has qualified him so well, of a local tyrant. There are various descriptions of Radicals—Radicals from prin ciple—Radicals from poverty—Radicals from ambi tion—Radicals from bile. Lord Durham seems to present a combination of the two latter elements of Radicalism. He took the promise of an Earldom from Mr. Canning ; he sought the fulfilment of that pro mise from the Duke of Wellington ; he did not dis dain to reap the empty honours of a mock mission to St. Petersburgh. At these periods his Radicalism must have been under the control of his ambition. But now that Earldoms and missions are out of the ques tion, bile has resumed its ascendancy, and the Radi calism of the Noble Earl seems as much a part of him as his complexion. We are convinced from the example of his Lordship, that bile is the source of the best and truest Radicalism, after all. He is now all for p triennial Parliaments, but nothing is more cer tain than that, if he should remain out of office for another year, and neglect in the meanwhile to take proper physic, he will by the end of that time be a staunch advocate for annual Parliaments. At present he stands out for the household suffrage ; but he must be Prime Minister within the twelve months, or immense doses of calomel will certainly be required to keep him from adopting the doctrine of Hunt, Cobbett, and Carlisle, that universal suffrage is the only cure for the disorders of our political consti tution. He advocates the vote by ballot now, which, for a Lord, none of whose tenants or dependants dare say that their soul is their own, is pretty well ; but by-and-by, if place or pill do not interpose their re medial operation, we shall have him contending that a voter who tells his brother, father, or wife how he means to exercise his franchise shall be put in the stocks. This Peer of the Realm now tells the people that the upper classes are determined to deprive them of their rights. If his ambition be not gratified, or his bile subdued forthwith, who does not perceive that we shall find him presently a very Cade in a coronet ? here is yet another proof of the Radicalism of Lord Durham, and it is one to which we reluctantly allude. After the mob-dinner at Glasgow, and at a period of the evening when some of the party at least had taken their wine or their punch very freely, as was proved by the necessity which immediately arose of turning one of them out of the room, Lord Durham directed the attention of the company—of such a company, at such a time— to his daughter, who was in the gallery, and forced her to rise from her seat, and become the object of the ge neral and vulgar gaze. We hope the practice is not likely to become prevalent—it has never yet prevailed in England—of fathers parading their daughters at po litical dinners. Retiring modesty and sensitive reserve arc the qualities which have hitherto been deemed most worthy of cultivation in females of the upper classes of society in this country. But our coronetted Cade is, it seems, of a different opinion. No pledge is too dear for him to offer to the revolutionary cause in which he has embarked. In the progress of the move- Lord Durham has had his gala at Glasgow. The Radicals at Glasgow have enjoyed the honour and satisfaction of entertaining Lord Durham. And the THE SUN, LONDON, SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1834, anent it is difficult to foresee what pageant may be got up, or what accessories may be required. But Lord Durham is resolved that on his part at least nothing shall be wanting ; that it shall be no fault of his, if when the proper time arrives, he cannot supply a fit representative of the Goddess of Reason out of his own house.—Morning Post. The public had in yesterday's Times the fruits of our exertions to obtain early information of the pro ceedings at the Glasgow dinner, and are therefore now in full possession of the remarkable speech delivered on that occasion by Lord Durham. The speech was in itself a good one, without reference to the questions of personal difference which it embraced, though from them of course it borrowed its most lively interest. It was a good speech, because it was a clear and forcible exposition of popular principles to which he pledged himself by a member of the aristocracy. It was a speech of considerable triumph also to Lord Durham, and to those who had anxiously anticipated his successful treatment of certain charges brought against him by one who it was suspected would be unable to sustain them, because it completely settled the whole matter of the speeches at Edinburgh and Salisbury, as well as that of the article in the Edinburgh Review, and, combined with a satisfactory vindication of Lord Durham, a humiliating overthrow of all that a well known personage had said or insinuated against him. Withthe personal quarrels of public men, it is true, that the country need not concern itself, but where controversies carried on between such individuals are of a mixed nature, involving on one side considerations of personal honour, truth, and trustworthiness, and on the other an inquiry into the opinions really held by men either in high station, or candidates for it, upon points of great importance to the well-being of the State, which those persons may be more or less enabled to influence, it then becomes a subject well worthy of na tional interest and observation, to ascertain by proof the merits of the parties, and the degree to which each of them ought to be relied upon or distrusted. We feel it to be no more than justice to Lord Durham to state, that the impression made upon us by his speech is favourable to his political honesty. He met the accusation of his Noble° and Learned assailant with signal boldness and • directness. He declared that the averment of his having wished to pro pose a less popular plan of reform than had been granted by the Government was an utter falsehood ; and if he did not go into details upon that question, lie assigned the motive for his abstinence by producing a letter from Lord Grey, enjoining him in a manner to refrain from the disclosure of what had passed in the Cabinet, but bearing witness to the consistency of Lord Durham throughout. The Noble Earl rebuts the charge of having betrayed the secrets of the Cabinet in his speech at Gateshead, by explaining that what he there alleged as to the particular share which Lord Grey had delegated to him in the preparation of the Reform Bill, was a fact known to hundreds of persons in London, who had, either on their own behalf or as representing public bodies, communicated with him on many of the questions under delibern' ion. He disowns the charge of being a " Dcs:.ructive," and recommends the removal of what is corrupt in our institutions, as the best and only means of preserving what is valuable in them ; at the same time it must be understood from his own lips what are the lengths which Lord Durham has made up his mind to as a progressive Reformer : for his avowal of them, although evidence of his own frank ' ness, is by no means equally conclusive of their wis dom. He would purify the church here, and in Ire land—on that all Reformers, and indeed all rational friends of both churches, arc agreed. He would purify the corporations every where, and restore them to their primitive uses, by making them correct and valid re presentations of local interests, as Parliament itself is presumed to be of the general interests of the nation. He would repeal the Septennial Act ; and so are the majority of reflecting men, we believe, disposed to assign a shorter duration to Parliaments. He would make the occupant of every house, no matter how small the value, an elector—a Measure on which Lord Durham will find throughout the country a great diversity of opinion. He would adopt the ballot, which we have invariably, though without intempe ranee, opposed, as a measure of more than doubtful policy, one of which the necessity is not apparent, and in the aggregate effects of which we cannot help fearing that the deep-seated evil would be found to overbalance any apparent and superficial good. However, this is not the time to argue questions of general expediency either by the side of Lord Durham or against him. Our business is with the light which his speech reflects upon the conduct of a no longer professing friend, but who now comes forward in the natural character of Lord Durham's prosecutor. The noble Earl accepts, though with a becoming acknowledgment of the Chan cellor's enormous facility and success as a debater—he accepts the challenge to confront that learned person in the House of lords, and in the face of an adverse majority of Tory Peers, whom Lord Durham thinks not unlikely to meet half way the calculating overtures of the noble and learned personage—with all these ad vantages, says Lord Durham, " I fear him not ;" and then, in allusion to the other persons composing the present Ministry, whom Lord Durham speaks of as having been many of them his intimate associates in office, and many of them still his private and intimate friends, his Lordship adds, what all the world will concur in, that " Lord Melbourne, the Prhne Minister, is an honest straightforward Statesman, incapable of intrigue and treachery,"— an expression which seemed to the whole of the vast assembly of auditors to carry a sting in it ; why, we shall not inquire. With regard to the ques tion between Lord Durham and his accuser, it is im possible for any candid man to read that speech with out feeling that it settles the dispute. It is the lan guage of one who knows that he has been injured,_ who has nothing to conceal,—who fears no investiga tion, and never dreams of the necessity for evasion. Some of the dapper friends of a certain learned person age indeed, with a forgetfulness as marvellous as if they had been bitten by their principal, pretend that Lord Durham needlessly volunteered his own defence, and to half-deplore, half-despise these personal miseres. There was no misere, then, or personality, or provo cation, in the snarling calumnies of the Edinburgh and Salisbury meetings, or in the more subtle, venomous, and elaborate falsehoods of the Review. What a pity that they should not one and all go unanswered ! Times. The extreme length of the proceedings at the Glasgow dinner, in honour of Lord Durham, coupled with other matters, of which it is essential that we shOuld furnish some brief account, compel us to omit those observations on the subject to which it is calcu lated to give rise. It would be unjust, however, on the one hand, to the people of Glasgow, not to state that they acquitted themselves with great credit of the honourable task which they had undertaken, and, on the other, to Lord Durham, not to state that while due honour was done to him, he also did credit to his past consistency and exertions by the liberal principles of which he still professes himself the advocate. " Vote by Ballot," "Triennial Parliaments," and " Household Suffrage," are, as he deems, essential to a full, fair, free, and independent representation of the opinions and interests of the people ; and on all these points we need not inform our readers that we have long been cordially agreed with him in opinion. In his condem nation also of the course pursued by the Government, of employing those to carry their views and wishes into effect whose principles are opposed to theirs and those of their supporters throughout the country, we most cordially join. It is base and impolitic in the highest degree—base because ungrateful, and impolitic because their best measures and best intentions have scarcely a chance of being fairly dealt with, or fairly carried into effect. We trust, however, if Lord Mel bourne deserve the high eulogium bestowed upon him by Lord Durham, that this system of policy will be altered for the better, and that we shall have neither Tory foreign Ambassadors to represent British inte rests at foreign Courts, nor Tory Lord Lieutenants of Counties to give the tone to our domestic politics. Upon another point we shall not for the present touch —we allude to the now irreconcileable quarrel be tween Lords Durham and Brougham—farther than to say that, in conjunction with many of our contempo raries, we deeply lament it. What will add also to the regret of the public is, that the quarrel appears, on due investigation, to have no substantial existence, ex cept in the imagination of the two Noble Lords, and the supposed insults which each has received from the other.—Morning Advertiser. THE ARMY (From the Limerick Chronicle of Wednesday.) Yesterday the first division of the depot companies of the 69th regiment, from Tralee, marched into this garrison, under command of Major Monins, and proceeded this morning for Clare Castle; to occupy the quarters of the 37th depot com panies. The detachment included the companies of Captains Stuart and Easson. Monday next, the remaining two com panies of the 69th, Captains Hooper and Coke, arrived here from Tralee, for the same destination, on being replaced by the 37th, this day, under Major Kell. Captain Easson's com pany, 69th, with Ensign Hemphill, are to replace Captain Costley's company, 37th, to Kilrush. The conduct of the 69th depot, while stationed at Tralee, was such as to merit and obtain the respect of every class of the inhabitants ; and, to the honour of the officers, strict discipline was maintained without any appearance of rigour, Captain Easson's company, 69th regiment, left, by , the Clarence steamer this morning, for Kilrush, to replace Captain Costley's company, 37th, ordered to Tralee. Staff Assistant Surgeon Byrne is ordered to take medical charge of the depot companies 36th regiment in this garrison in place of Surgeon Reilly, ordered to join the service com panies in the West Indies forthwith. The party of the 7th Dragoon Guards detached from this garrison to Newcastle, arc to remain at that out station for the winter, if any disturbances arise from the recovery of tithes. The 91st are detached from Birr at Shannon Harbour, Ba nagher, and Frankford. The 60th Rifles have detached a company from Nenagh to Roscrea. The grand division of the 82d regiment, from Belfast, ar rived in Dublin this day, under command of Lieut.-Colonel Hogarth. The 27th (Enniskilleners) are now concentrated under Lieut.-Colonel Hare, K. H. , at Beggar's Bush, George's street barracks, and Pigeon House, Dublin. The garrison of the metropolis is at present composed of the 3d Dragoon Guards, 15th Hussars, Grenadier Guards, 27th, 46th, 81st, and 82d regiments. The grand division of the Royal Regiment from Dublin, under Lieut.-Colonel Wetherall, K. H , marched into Athlone last Wednesday, where the head-quarters are fixed. The 14th regiment , from Athlone, have ar r ived at Mullin gar. Captain Hazlewood's company is to be stationed at Tul lamore, and Captain Watson's at Killucan ; the company at Castletown-Delvin having been countermanded for the present, in consequence of the appearance of the cholera. Detachments of the Royals have been sent to Roscommon, Shannon-bridge, Ballinasloe, Clogher, and Ferbane. The Atka troop-ship is arrived at Cork from Dublin, to embark reinforcements for the troopsin the West Indies. The depot companies of the 78th Highlanders, from Dundee, have taken up the quarters of the late depot companies of the 71st at Perth. The 71st are now concentrating the service and depot companies in Scotland. Lieut.-Colonel Badcock, of the 15th Hussars, has left Dub lin on leave of absence, and the command of the regiment has devolved upon Major Sir Walter Scott, Bart. Lieut.-Colonel Cater, of the Royal Horse Artillery, has left Island-bridge for England, on leave of absence. Three companies of the 35th (or Royal Sussex) Regiment, left this garrison for Templemore on the 23d instant, and three companies followed on Friday for the same destination. Both of these divisions were commanded by Field Officers. Four companies with the head-quarters of the 25th, under the com mand of Lieut.-Colonel Goldie, marched hence on Saturday for Templemore.—Dublin Paper. BANKRUPTCY COURT—Ocr. 31. MARSH, STRACEY, GRAHAM, FAUNTLEROY AND COMPANY'S BANKRUPTCY. A meeting of the creditors of this banking firm was an nounced to be held to-day, for the purpose of proving one of the debts claimed by the Court of Directors of the Bank of England against the general estate of the bankrupts, for forgeries committed by the late Mr. Fauntleroy upon the Bank of England. In consequence, however, of some pro ceedings on the part of the Bank of England, relative to the claim fixed for discussion to-day, namely, that. for stock sold out of the name of Sir Edward H. Stracey, by a forged power of attorney, no parties appeared to support the claim from the Bank of England to-day. The total claim of the Bank of England upon the general estate of the bankrupts, for forgeries committed by Fauntleroy, amounts to 230,000/. Dividends have already been declared upon the general estate amounting to Bs. 4d. in the pound, and the amount which is locked up to meet the claim of the Bank of England, is not less than 10,0001., which is invested in ex chequer bills, and lodged in the hands of Messrs. Coutts and Company. Should the claims on the general estate for the forgeries committed upon the Bank of England by Fauntleroy be established, the amount of dividend which will become payable to the creditors will be small. The debts proved against the general estate exceed 100,0001. The last dividend declared, of fivepence in the pound, has, by order of the Court of Review, been retained to meet the claim of the Bank of England. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, OCT. 31. Mr. John Bryant Lane, the historical and portrait painter, applied from the King's Bench on his petition to be discharged. He was opposed by Mr. Stiles, a cre ditor, for picture frames, and was supported by Mr. WOOD ROFFE. The petitioner was examined by the opposing creditor. He considered himself, two years ago, when he contracted this debt, perfectly solvent. He had previously studied his art in Italy. He had been kindly assisted by Lord De Dunstanville, and had inserted his Lordship and his bro ther in his schedule as creditors, though he never expected to be called upon for the debts. He had had two valuable pictures, one representing the " Parting of Lord William Russell from his family," and the other " The Vision of Joseph ;" the former had cost him 5001., and the latter was worth 700/. He had, among other pictures, given up for the benefit of his creditors " The Parting of Lord William Russell." It had been sold by the brokers of the Court for 30/. The other picture would be given up for the cre ditors on paying 601. to the proprietors of the Pantechnicon for its exhibition in their rooms. The same picture was exhibited in the King's Mews. Mr. Lane said a friend of Mr. Steirs came to him in prison and required some ar rangement, which he refused. _ . The opposing creditor expressed himself satisfied with the evidence of Mr. Lane ; he answered the questions in a straightforward manner. He was about to be discharged, when it was discovered that'an advertisement had not been inserted in a Brighton paper. Mr. Commissioner BOWEN expressed his regret at the omission, which would delay his discharge for some time. He ordered the case to be adjourned for the insertion of the advertisement. Mr. John Mitten, a lieutenant in the navy on half-pay, was opposed by Mr. WOODROFFE, on the part of Mr. Lewis Price Maddon, ancL was supported by Mr. COOKE. The insolvent's half-pay amounted to 821. 10s. a year, independent of which his wife had 801. a year, which on her death would revert to him. She had suffered much from ill-health. He had been in active service from 1799 until the termination of the late war, and had received two wounds in his head. The ground of opposition was to ob tain a portion of the pay for the creditors. Mr. Commissioner BOWEN ordered 401. a year to be set aside, and discharged the insolvent. The Court adjourned till Monday. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. Q UEEN- SQ UARE, THE CHIMNEY-SWEEPERS' ACT.—Yesterday consider able sensation was excited amongst the chimney-sweepers in Westminster in consequence- of informations laid against twq of the fraternity, under a clause in the late Act of Parliament lately come into operation, which subjects them to a penalty of any sum not exceeding 101., or less than 40s. The informations were laid by Millard, and the first case was against R. Michell, of Bull's Head-court, Great Peter street. He was charged with having employed a boy under fourteen years of age as a chimney sweep, he not being an apprentice, contrary to the Act of Parliament. The defendant, after the information was read over to him, was asked whether he was " Guilty, or not guilty ?" The defendant stared wildly on being questioned, as if he did not understand what was meant, but on its being re peated, he said, " Not guilty, my Lords." John Staples, on Monday, the 27th instant, saw the de fendant with a little boy carrying tools as a chimney sweep. They went into a house in Greycoat-street, Tothill-fields. He watched them for some time, and saw them come out again, and the defendant brought out a bag full of soot, which he carried across his shoulders. He watched them home, and ascertained that the boy's name was John Wilson, and to all appearance he did not look to be above ten years of age. Mr. WHITE—Have you any further evidence ? Wit ness—No, Sir. Mr. WHITE—Then the case is very incomplete, you have no proof that the boy was under fourteen years of age. Witness—He did not appear to be ten. Mr. WHITE—Very likely ; but we cannot inflict a heavy penalty on a man merely on a boy's appearance. The defendant was not called upon for his defence, and the case was dismissed. Robert Marshal, of Great Peter-street, master chimne' sweep, appeared to answer a similar complaint. Old Bob, as he is termed, prides himself on having a great knowledge of the law, and on being asked whether he was guilty or not guilty, made no reply. Clerk—Are you guilty or not guilty ? Bob—l begs werry respectively to take a werry peculiar jection to this here hinformashion. Mr. WHITE—What is it ? Bob—Vhy, in this here paper they calls me " Robert." Now, though people calls me " Bob," that's not my name. Mr. WHITE—Then what is your name? Bob—Vhy, my name is Thomas Marshall, therefore this hinformashion is regularly flummuxed. Mr. WHITE told him that he certainly might avail him self of the objection if he thought proper, but another in formation would be laid against him in his right name. He might take his choice. Bob—ls that ere the new Hact ? Vell, then, I pleads " Not guilty." Staples, on the 27th inst., saw the defendant come out of his house with a little boy carrying tools as a chimney sweeper, and shortly afterwards he saw them return home, the defendant loaded with a bag of soot. Bob—Veil, and vhat of that ? Mr. WHITE—What age was the boy?—Witness said that he appeared very young and under fourteen years of age. Mr. WHITE—That evidence won't do. The Legislature, by the Act of Parliament, has laid the onus on the person suing for the penalty to prove the age of the boy. The informer said that the defendant had received notice to produce the boy, but he was not in attendance. Mr. WHITE had no objection to adjourn the case until next week, when the boy might be produced, which was agreed to. UNION-HALL. Several journeymen chimney sweepers were brought be fore Mr. MunnAv, charged with hawking in the streets con trary to the late Act of Parliament. Millard, the informer, and his witnesses, proved that the defendants were calling out " Sweep" as they went along the streets, and as if no Act had passed prohibiting the trade from the announcement as formerly. The defendants all pleaded guilty to the offence, and had tried the experiment whether they could obtain a living for themselves and families by complying with the rules, but finding it impossible, they were compelled to hawk in the streets as usual. They added, that if they did not announce their trade by calling out " Sweep," those who required their services had no opportunity of obtaining their assist ance when the chimneys smoked, and they stood in most need of them. Several persons belonging to a Committee of Master Chimney-sweepers said that the defendant had been warned not to persevere in hawking in the streets,Jut they disre garded the advice. The Magistrate said that the law must not be broken, and as it appeared that the defendants were aware they were committing a breach of it by calling out in the streets, he should inflict a fine to make them remember it. The defendants, one and all, said that they would go to gaol sooner than pay the fines. They were, therefore, com mitted for short periods to the tread-mill. Crowds of sweeps stopped up the streets in front of the office, determined on attacking Millard and his witnesses, both of whom were obliged to get away by stealth, other wise they would have been roughly handled. We are at length enabled positively to announce that for the ensuing Season the King's Theatre will be under the same direction as the Italian Opera at Paris; and M. Ra bert, the principal manager ofthat establishment is hourly ex pected here to conclude the necessary arrangements. MONTHLY MILITARY OBITUARY. GENERAL—Sir H. Warde, G. C. 8., Col. 31 F., Alresford, Hampshire, Oct. 1. MAJoa—Gillespie, late of R. Mar., July 25. CAPTAINS—Hunt, h. p. 83 F., France, Sept. 17 ; Barrs, h. p. Unatt., Dinan, France, Oct. 2; M. Burton, R. Mar., July 24. LIEUTENANTS—Hinde, 4 Dr., Bombay, April 19 ; Hut chinson, R. Air. Corps, on passage from Si erra L eone , Sept. 5 ; G. Stewart, h. p. 1 F., Aug. 10; Winckelman, h. p. Wagg. Tr., Sept. 27; Keily, h. p. 60 F., London, Sept. 24; M`Daniell, h. p. 67 F., Sept. 25 ; Parnall, h. p. 83 F., Sept. 10; Miles, h. p. Rif. Br., Swindon, Wilts, Sept. 6 ; Atcherley, h. p. 1 Prov. Bn. Mil., May 27 ; Leo pold, late 7 Line Ger. L., July 11; J. Evans, late Art. Drivers, Oct. 19. SECOND LIEUTENANTS, CORNETS, AND ENSIGNS—PidCOCk h. p. 21 Dr., Aug. I ; Cliffe, b. p. 93 F., July 25; Perry, late 6 R. Vet. Bn., Sept. 15 ; H. Lyte, h. p. R. Mar., Oct. ; Quarry, h. p. R. Mar., Aug. 22 ; Harris, h. p. R. Mar„ June ; Stone, h. p. R. Mar., July 25 ; Sam. Campbell, h. .R. Mar., Aug. 15. ADJUTANT Davidson, late 4 R. Vet. Bn., Calais, Sept. 29. QUARTER-MASTERS—BinIey, 1 F., Dublin, Oct. 2 ; How croft, h. p. 2 Life Gds., Sept. 12; Newstead, h. p. Norf. Fen. Cay. Aug CHAPLAINS—Cane, h. p. 128 F., Oct. ; Fisher, h. p. 131 F., Sept. 23. MEDICAL DEPARTMENT—Dep. Insp. Gen. of Hosp. Sir J. D. A. Gilpin, Bath, Sept. 30; Staff As. Surg. Geddes, Canada, Aug. 5. COMMISSARIAT DEPARTMENT—Dep. Com. Gen. J. J. Moore, Preston, July 3. SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. VESSELS ENTERED INWARDS AT THE CUSTOM-HOUSE, OCT. 31. The Harlequin, Corbin, from Calais ; Fortuna, Bernitt, Harlingen Hussen ; Navarino, Paynter, Gijon ; Nonpareil, Allen, Smyrna ; Flaimtom, M'Donald, Riga ; Haabit, Guyse, Kioge ; Anne Maria, Israel, Prastoe; Gustave, Schievallian, Dantzic ; Active, Snell, Malaga ; Vonebuck, Dixon, St. Pe tersburg ; Petit St. Orient, Mulin, Gravelines ; La Confi anan, Dien, Berlin ; Union, Hayd, Berlin ; La Bellone, Lavalle, Berlin ; Victorins, Voss, Memel; Don Juan, Yates, Denia ; Straton, Rae, Denia; John Cullen, Huper, St. Pe tersburg. ENTERED OUTWARDS FOR LOADING, OCT. 31. The Cuba, Wyllie, for St. Lucia; Maddison, Wood, New Orleans; Brocklebank, Stranack, Ostend ; Belfast, Middleton, Calais ; William Jolliffe, Downie, Hambro.' CLEARED OUTWARDS WITH CARGO, OCT. 31. The Earl of Liverpool, Lomax, for Rotterdam : City of Hambro', Wittingham, Hambro'; Charles Brooks, Bell, St. Vincent's; Brocklebank, Strannack, Ostend 7 • Union, Head, Havre; Lord, Goderich, Daul en y, G rena d a; Neptunus, Pie ters, Antwerp ; Ann, Sickling, Hambro' ; Weichel, Lang, Stettin • Adda, Simpson, J ama i ca; Ed en , F ran kli n , Deme rara; Commerce, Durig, Brussels ; Vrow Fremengina,Bream, Amsterdam; Ocean, Falconer, Genoa. CLEARED OUTWARDS IN BALLAST, OCT. 30. Lugertha, Eliason, for Norway; Trine, Wass, Elsinore ; Governor M 4 K . ean, Freebody, S t . J o h n ' s , N.B. ARRIVALS AND DEPARTURES AT THE SCOTCH WHARFS. The late stormy weather, which has been attended with con siderable loss of property, and not a few lives at sea, has pre-' vented the arrival of several smacks at the respective wharfs. HOARE'S WHARF, OCT. 29.—Arrived the Rose, Bruce, from Stettin, with a cargo of staves and linseed ; experienced a dreadful passage. Whilst off Borcorn, on the 25th instant, she took on board the master and crew of the brig Charlotte, from Jacobstadt, to Leghorn, consisting of twelve persons, that ves3el having been dismasted, and unmanageable.—The Manly, Captain Benzie, from Limekilns, with a cargo of coals. Re ports having seen a number of dismasted vessels on the east coast.—Oct. 29. No departures or advices. DOWNE'S WHARF, OCT. 28.—Arrived none.—Sailed, at 10 A.M., the Inverness and London Shipping Company's smack Hero, Captain John M'lntosh, for Inverness, with a general cargo of merchandise. Oct. 22.—Arrived, 10 A.M. , the Mon trose and London Shipping Company's smack Osnaburg, Cap tain William Keith, from Montrose, with a full average cargo of canvass, provisions, &c. Sailed at 10 P.M., the Peterhead and London New Shipping Company's smack London, Cap tain Robert Martin, for Peterhead, with a general cargo of merchandise. At nine A.M., the Dundee, Perth, and London Shipping Company's powerful steam-ship Dundee, John Wishart, commander, for Dundee, with a considerable number of passengers, and an extensive valuable cargo of merchan dise. No advices. ABERDEEN STEAM-PACKET WHARF, OCT. 28.-- Arrived, 8 p.m., the Queen of Scotland steamtlhip, Commander Pear son, from Aberdeen, with passengers and a general cargo. LEITH AND GLASGOW WHARF, * OCT. 27. Arrived, at six p.m., the Royal William steam-ship, William Chaplin, com mander, from Leith, with passengers, and a valuable cargo of merchandise. Oct. 28.—N0 arrivals or departures, and no advices. Oct. 29.—Arrived, at 11 a.m., the London, Leith, and Glasgow Shipping Company's smack Eagle, George Todd, master, from Leith, with a good cargo, principally consisting of thirty puncheons of whiskey, and a great quantity of Edin burgh ales, &c. Oct. 29.—Sailed none, and no arrivals. LEITH AND BERWICK WHARF, Oct. 28. Arrived, at 10 a.m., the London and Leith Old Shipping Company's smack Sir William Wallace, John Tulloch, master, from Leith, with a general cargo, principally whiskey and Edinburgh and Leith ales. This vessel had a very quick passage, having sailed from Leith only on Saturday evening last. At 6 p.m., the London and Berwick Shipping Company's smack King William, Cap tain William Dalgleish, from Berwick, with a general cargo, principally provisions. Oct. 29.—Arrived none. Sailed, at 11 p.m., the London and Berwick Shipping Company's smack, Stately, Captain Andrew Farmer, for Berwick, with a general cargo of groceries, &c. Oct. 29.—N0 advices. The late gales, which appear to have been general along the coasts, have prevented the arrival of several vessels. The crowded state of our columns prevented us giving the arrivals and departures on Tuesday and Wednesday. The following are the arrivals and departures yesterday : DOWNES WHARF, OCT. 30.—N0 arrivals or departures. Ad vicc.—The Dundee, Perth, and London Shipping Company's steam-ship Perth, owing to the violence of the late destructive gales, did not arrive at Dundee until the evening of Sunday the 26th instant. The practical knowledge of Captain James Kidd, her experienced sailing-master, and her own qualities as a sea-going steam-ship, nearly, if not altogether, approach ing those of the powerful and splendid steam-ship Dundee, Commander John Wishart, are a sufficient guarantee that no thing but the violence of the late storm, which now appears to have been general, occasioned the procrastination in her ar rival at her destination, viz., the very much increased of late years and still rapidly increasing flourishing port of Dundee. Mr. Clirehugh, the steward, continues to give great satisfac tion to passengers generally. MILLER'S WHARF, OCT. 30.—N0 arrivals. Sailed at 1, P. M., the London and Edinburgh Shipping Company's Smack Trusty, Captain Rehren, for Leith • and the Aberdeen a nd London Shipping Company's smack Bon Accord, • Captain Robert Duncan, for Aberdeen, both with general cargoes of m o ii Aberdeene r c Company'sh Tuesday, n d i o z e n . s Sunday,in a A ek d v i Regent, 7.lL o ._ n E g liT f i r i Onl AN N D N. W aS in OriMY, R , r ' thwihnisethants,ailed from L ' f 11°36' the 28th instant, the wind then blemno v• a rriva ls ' Advice.—The Aberdeen and LoncloaonSdhoiplifr.:r G E L . ASGOW WHAM', OCT. 30.-00, i9sgoi( ?„:: i . lec . at noon, the London, Leith, O CT. and in Shipping Company's smack Venus, Captain Benjeoin..,es.., for Leith, with a general cargo of merchandize. Ad"' None. '• g• LEITH AND on No a rr " al BERWICK WHARF, OCT. .-.--- COP Sailed, at noon, the London and Leith Old Shippol, r jor pany's smack Earl of Wemyss, Alexander Brown, M ge Leith, with en extensive general cargo. AdviSoe• -------- FRENCH COMMERCE. e Of n ier ----- PARIS, OCT. 28.—The general view of the co e rn o, ja the rcance with its Colonies, and with Foreion P" . f cust os ' year 1833, has just been published by the 8` in a very rents thick octavo volume. This publication is iv t, ; w hcii en strutting, but will be particularly so at this must questions questions are under discussion in which its statenlentlais: 163 often referred t o . We extract a few summary stat3e.'. GENERAL CO3IMERCE OF FRA N cr "A' Value; of Imports in 8676 ships, of which 3567 wore 6 . 95 ,9 5,' , French Value of Exports by 8255 ships, of which 3675 were _ 66, 3164 French .................. ................ i01, 636 '4 6 1 Import Duties ........................................... .'d Export Duties ......................... ............................... The value of the goods in n the 31st of 4 7 9. 35 , .. ........................ ,01,1 01 nt Dec., ..................... 4 , t 0, 3 9 '' i - x licocd 44 , n1 0 Taken out of the Entre_pots .............................. 060, Remaining on the 31st Dee., 1833 ..................... " TRANSIT T RADE. 60, 3' 6 0 ,3 83 ....... A 7,031 T0ta1.......... -------------- ............................... /1,0 107 ,8 ' Of which 44,197,872, by land. 4 ,916 Value of goods exported, on which a bounty as 99f , •• 0 1 paid, is... ................................................... Bounties paid' ............ g. 50,0, In 1832 the bounties paid amounted to ...................0 1 This difference arises from the difference in the ban' 1 810 tics paid on Refined Sugar, which in 1832 Was .- 123 1 , 5 f1ie And in 1833 ................. ......... .................isnotine. Raw Production Manufactures The value of Corn exported and imported, ' above, as far as can be ascertained. The Corn imported ............ 5 06 ' 85° 1,, 9 9, u,' 1 31 361 1.0%, exported .................................••••. The value of Goods seized on importation , —Messager de Chambres, Oct. 29. LONDON MARKETS. V C , le PRICE OF BREAD: fo r t!4IPibY The highest, price of Bread in the Metrope!l: thr eehl2 „,.. .7 'fhere are others who sell from a half-pennl that rate, jute 4.44, PRIC OF SUGA.R. The Average Price of Brown or Muscovad. Sug a o l Ocetw:ClP o , the Returns made in the week ending the 26th daY outi o of v iol 28s. 6d. per hundred Wei g ht, exclusive of t he , n to 61. cat paid or payable thereon on the Irntrirtation therem ----------- r 6 r PRICE OF SEEDS. -0e ou arter••, •,'' i fs Per Cwt. per ~.. .- ' s. ..... ......„ k 0. New English Red Clovers2s. COs 65s St. Foin .............. ~ 4 11 „;; New Foreign Ditto Di 4 Ditto Ditto Old Ditto Ditto —s. 38s. 595. Linseed, wr '" ......... , 4 0 —s. — 6B, s . —s pßacyeeyGrGarass:s.; .. c..:...e.,:i.in...g......:: j a ..4.5: 4...,, ,,, ,5: New White Clover Ms. tVis. 66s Ditto, for sown , F _ ...... 5 .0 , OH Ditto Ditto —6 504 . Os Ditto, for crwhin ....... ~S. ~;,, 44 , ..... ....0 )- New Trefoil 2..1s 23s 265. Canary ••.• ............. ~ea• 0 d Ditto —s. l6s. cgs Heinp .......... e .. ; ~..0 J. 2,4,4 Rib Grass 5 : 0 3. --s —4 —s Boglish Carraway —s 6,35. 66s White Mustard ...... . l os ll Foreign Ditto Coriander :s s . M ls s , . 2 ( S i I )s )8 Br ow Winter n Rapeseed, English fine (per.Lasti :',Ol. 33 1 . • ... Ditto Tart, 5.... i.. :).:...re.., g7r.: va...... ~ : 0 tr. UPS. —O :31 o ,to ", pi. P 5 , 0+• I V ' 0. 5 to es , 6,10 E. j o,. to g: 50. 5' Ot. , i fr, to 1. 4, 0 , 01. OE. 4 * 5 .. to 5 , 10. I a t 17140'0, PRICES OF lj K-nt Pockets (par cwt.) Choice ditto Kent Bags.... Sussex Pockets Superfine ditto Duty rated pit. % ei 61 , i n s,, toot r , 6 ', Ice, l' ~, 4.). • (4 0 d ~. .1..: , __ltaPe a t I Id , PRICES OF LEATHF• it rer lb .0. , ' gl Per lb dto d I . (4 1,1 ), .•••"si4 0 Crop Hidesi 30 to 4011) each II 13 Horse Hitle ,, spa ni , ( ol). l 7 0 ---- -It/ 50 ... l2 16 -- ------- a,)ioO•••'" . #2 1 .21 --CO 60 l4 17 Calf Skins,,.. 5 , '•••" •• i 1•4.. , 6 Bull Hides 11l 11 • ---"'" 5 0 „. • ... I- j 3 Butts, Vitriol - -- 0 1 0 ... ..." 16 0 ----- English - lar ge , ' ... .•••• ~i 1 3 - r °reign ... _ 0 i1. , " .... ..••• 9 g i Foreign Hides lO IS i ----•-• , .. . ..... • ......... 0 Dressing Hides .. .... - --- Sil ' ay...d .... 12 1 16 ! Basils ...................... ::,... Be t Saddlers Hides ...... , Horse Hides, English • If rounded 21 to 4d per lb .... ,0ct.. 3() ' ^ WitITECHAPEL HAY MAR K 6 9 ''' Hay.. 75s Id . to 100 s td i Clover - ....... Plilt.;E OF uIL Rape Oil, brown, per ton, 43:7;::: Lin,eed Oil Cale at the Mill, (leoo - Straw gs vd to 3 H!.....---1F,10 1 .t -..."-111 01 , PRICES OF POTATOES AT Sr t'l :',, 4l 3l. t ' s. gi ' t ° Kidneys (York) from vessel +l. Os. `i; 31. e s * ditto Scotch Reds ditto .. .21. 'Os • t e t l(P• d o Common Reds :IL O''' to 21 .2/. l o6 'ditto haws ~ ............. '2 • L' S ' t t o a t'' eitt ° Middling .... ..... - ii. les. , g. Os. Chats ..- -I/ 55 - t° ''. r PRICE OF RAW FAT, rr stone f : Price of Tallow (as stated by the Tallow Aleßas' 0 .. ..r. "e• ld PRICE OF TALLOW, SOAP. ..... ........ Town Tallow 46s. 6d. Yellow Soap " . ...... ( 0 . , `" Yellow Russia ‘ , 3s. Od. Mottled .• ........ White.., Od. Curd.. Soap Ditto —s. Od. Graves... ••• ..... Melting Stull' ....... ..... 31s. Od. Good Dregs .... I).tto Rough tiOs. Od. PRICE OF 'he price of good Store Candles i Cand' 7s thl • 1: -11 0 to: is . f'..5 CANDI' L the Retail ch, des. per dozen Sixpenc per doz, fe-rior, 0,1.--1; discniint for ..Ef.—oct. Walls End gecone l ',.. , 0 t ri ,pe and TY!'re,,tb.„. ..... Wails End P Walls End e ••• 9 t,inbtons P,!ro. 4 Walls End lett°. a. 9 Walls End Lainbr,'"ge,W.„ :.1 Walls End Wars 5 ••••":....• NV &is End Stew Walls End Ade l ; parb,5,70,,,:,..; eta End Sonliooy ... „ Walls End St. ri3 i 9 6 Walls End,Vite,t:oon ,3" Howard's C0.,,10P 0 6 Stone 1211 r sh fro , ' iF 5 Stone Coal Dr ........ • ... 15 ................ pany .... ,„.. .. 0 ,0 Walls End I.A. Walls End Ile"' _ COAL MAR Per Ton. s. d Adair's 19 3 East Percy l9 0 Holywell Ord's Redhugh l7 6 18 0 Pontop Windsor lB 3 I) , tto, Stanhope and Tyne __ _ Company IR 3 Picton 2!l2pcote l5 9 Tali field 20 0 West Hartley Wylam_ _ __ 3 Wills End Bell, Robson & Co. 2. - .2 0 \ Valls End Bewicke and Co.„ '22. 6 Walls End Brown's 2t 6 Watts End Clark and Co. 2O ( Walls End Gosforth Walls End Heaton UR.1511,1,11 .3 01 Walls End Ile" - Walls Eud Newmarch 22 3 14. f s l ‘ COUNTRY CORNShips —.------- ...,, 0 TI. re? - / ile 4 o a t, ..........., 0 • rer Quarter. i Wheat. I Barley. ,___,.- arri;dAitsinKce:it.stsmpartikeitt-:, u . : AS . ' .., e,.. ----- 1 .--- 0 : 3s 42 146 .1 6 Ashburn —............ 47 58 1 2J : 31 , !,.1 .3 , ...5,, 9„ Ai -; Blsingsteke ......... 6tt 55 25 3 . 5 • 0 - ", u 4 ' ',I - ,,q ' -, liath --........... 38 53 28 3,3 o '7, 25 d i 'I 1"" - Bridgewater .....«.. 48 56 22 26 '. 20 31 4',, - t-- Bristol 48 5 , i 28 3 2 I irl 4 4 ' ''' Chesterfield —...... 44 55 28 33 1 1 ~ 2 5 41 IC , Derby *....... 41 44 31 3 . 5 1 ,-; 28 411 43 '''' 15 Doncaster .„........ 45 50 27 41 1, 26 -- 40 0) r D0rche5ter............ 45 31 , 0 .2 , 44 06 ~,,/ Exeter.,........—............. 42 46 28 34 2 ,1 o f 3 ~3 ', 4 0 .... ;,," G10uce5ter,.,,....,... 38 52 25 34 2 " 98 d '' ''' 1 06 ' Hungerford —..... 31 50 22 3C' 21 , 4 --- al , / 34 143 , i "... ...., 5c..vbury............ 23 52 24 35 17 93 56 _, 14 I ' ~, 11em5ey.................. 52 58 26 ;ID " 17 -- i ''''; . ' - Shaftesbury —......— 54 25 --„: 2 3 3_,. 4_,' .., Shrptou Mallet.. 44) 50 3 , 1 36 n cu, t 26 D'' OV A , i f , Sherhorne......— 46 52 26 32 ''' 19 r . :4 :3 ,. i l 1 s ii 0 o - ' , r - d. 0•%, - * ‘' Yarmouth .—....... 40 45 '25 3 1 ' i d. C' - 0, 0 - V eovil ......—......, 40 52 28 20 :“°., it „ d. 1 0 ° c l. Per Bushel. s. d. s.d. s. 4. s. d. 8 ; `'.,. 70: 0 I, 0 Shrewsbury -........- 6 0 7 0 4 4 5 6 " t 31. d• 5' 3 0 ET .. ._oc • s . to 0 ~ DEVIZES CORN MARK , No rter• .66 Jr 1,0 , l'er Sack. s. cl. s. d. Per x ......... ~,, i „ 7 0 0 0 4; , 0 Best Wheat SecJnd 2 2 51 0 0 to 22 27 6 0 B o a a r t i s e . Y . : ... 7.: * * , .... ; ........... .... 06 11 1 'thirds ls 0 38 0 Beans W: 00 4)••••• 1 1133 Sacks of Wheat sold/ 8 Flour (p- _ 4O . ..,,. 61 4a. ( 21 Bread (er s oct• :S" A tO 'I) arsicrir. nf ... I'. . _ At. 4.2 , Wheat, Do. BIRMINGHAM Ginding ---------r(r---)e:13d ,1b .A..1.t..K...b....... 5: . 0 : t 0 0 , 1 6 , ,: 4 0 4 : 1. Barley, imperial i ............................................. g 9 ,:: la quarter ..................... . .......... : 3 _ I ,', Oats, anb ..... - ............................. ' 6 P o - .................................. 0. Old Beans, u(scilb ................... 14 6 c ,.; 6 New ditto .......................... .. ,_ 0 ~. 0 •_ f .. • .................... ' • •• 1 " New White Boiling Pease, .3 imp. bush. .......... IS o Ditto Grey ditto ~—....--,.::•• . j • 0. / ____ --_--- , s , Oc -•oe A ° MANCHESTER QUARTER SESSI437I.ch we f y ,fir e brief summary in yesterday's paper, Stating INDICTMENT FOR LIBEL.—This case, of that'"'l the ju iifi t i lj e f WaTllaisreEy TP.HoEI,TtoISb. locked up when our report left Manchester, ~ ~,, ga1i,,,,,,0 Jury acquitting Mr. Prentice, the Editor 0t370,,,AV Tinges, after being confined for nine 1 , ire Advertiser. termiate ches!.d ths' gi ll , state AO 4 i t Thetis has been raised, and carried up to r. J' ta inea 41, damage st's. rie'v° nearly e --- re W pa e ired a . re lt is P, r s • c t so great as was at first defiesaPPrehen• .. bou 4 00, , in the after part of the vessel. The enginn.r nn`',. t hat ~ls not sustained any material injury- We ude s 7, ca ta• ol , l ; t 6 ' inquiry has been instituted as to the cause o . was not chats,,„ >G' dto aird,s r, 0 0,,, and that there is every reason to believe that, It r / ~ cidental.—Liverpool Albion. _________--------- --------------:':'t-zsdi" BIR TR'S. _ la p of r i , On the 30th ult., in Tavistock-place, the , a llte'q , f a d a ty co Comyn, Esq., of a son. On the 28th ult., at Paris, Lady Scott Pou.g a ti e ° r Cobh'''' • On the 2.5 th ult., at Paris, the lady of Ale x O f° / 1 and he 0 t he ham, Esq., of Shinfield, Berks, of as° h Smith ers, On the 30th daughter the wile of Mr. Josep wall-road, of a . el' . B 'l" MA R R IID . f rcishire, t..e , e iloe , t ot On the 30th ult., at Mapledurharo, Ox.:, s..e son ot 00 g1 , Seymour, Rector of Kinwartoo, arw. X . 1 " 4 , tO franCeOY 0 0 Rear-Admiral Sir Michael Seymour, Bart , I: e 11 . ,° el Sutton, Essex. n of the late Charles Smith, Esq., of i‘lesham,l3."'' or" On the 28th ult. the Rev. Arthur B. . ff third (la to Monerle e, Corpus Christi Cole e, Oxford, . n ~,,_, N'B' Colonel Patterser of oquhie, i rife, / _.--- --, c 9 Dih.D. . _ e i a mare, 0 oto On the 26th ult., Mr. NicholasoJa,ro6e9.l, •'-' ter g4 1 , street, Union-street, Bishopgafe, a c e ° tet Leices f th e On the 29th ult., in Upper Castle -s re ~a u ,_, 4 , v • d youngest O gRi. A Frances, wife of Mr. R. M. Pite, an i-roa'''' Anthony Starkey, Esq., of Ilackne. c .„, e ,,, I;.en cbie, On the 30th ult., at his father's hens , i‘ la I ldt t , William Stroud, of Great Tower-street.___za_ f „,_ Tiro 0 _ _ to On the 29th ult., at Belmont, 13ath2,elltinDsoT, '5,1., fP I olio , son, eldest daughter of the late James ti teu " v iet bury-square. -NW , ' of Millbauk z/ On the bury-squares ult., Mr. John Higgs, ster, aged 70. ...-z---i.si 116' ------- --- vi - iii) 0 - ° ' - ------- ---- London : Printed and Publishe y _ ~..laid. at The Sea Office, No. ir ,w • ' H 33 Sacks of Wheat soki} of 8 at the average of 19 0 N4LI