The Sun. — London, England, 1827-11-22 00:00:00

-TIS DAY•) kts of Sherry , d 1 621; itere to lions. Eirki. am e vessel,;lo, inv. F our 0 0 e 31 08 galloro. Brothers, }3 103., Per ) po d , !sse, 10 1 . Ar otro gallonp. the Agne s, ritbdrovn• ler the Relial; 10/. per 56 100 le, Roper' Id 1110unr3i"'Pf, , entered 16 • id' the P e r pe r iog. ; t he 11 ‘: , ;ne, pe r I EI4 red June.,atilt f ditto, r 9, entered r t he iye /WO , P e yr Os. to 9.19. It; f 182 0 p en ce lerdsrp, ditto, c lu n ti o F f old red d oze e d d .1u ties f ,`' 5 of to p "'r e p ot , ' , e Cape, fo' ;'o7,,rnerce , 4 s, duty pi",;#l, t, per tilefroo It. los. Per the Fe Afer(°l1 r 1 15 s . w per the °; 111 :: 1824; 9" e OW' P er th 110 0 " er 117 0 o di) o f Wee' alloo• c h a se , ' per the )er galloo. is in , f Gua til" s. ,d, to G s : 10 „_4 ot (1` 00 of n serou s 11). Sl% lb. 3 s . 6d. P P` i ,iog et ;y paid, ditto , li d 20 d_c)' owing r ocks , id ,ondon D. produced 99 ld Id. to ditto ; I'6l ne t, Keaton, P.A to en co ntle oo 7,Bitt eir con trY,cr t i l e execution 'n ord er , r since the t i„ o• been r at i the and 4Y°nre iefo re , minutes spo potti s V 7 o ;ded t‘' fter sitt i4 table . y ier• L ate ittb 3 P ll ob le to r e ' e Dr' ietal, by 0 led 11 c i ) yet staggere_ those not bear tu „ ° 11 mid oc• oppearao 0,1 gen teell if to eY ° ' ° led in le wa' , ,„ t o the table 00 tied he , "e i e i had a 9 ;:, mov ed whilst I,e at oue period • ittle as powbl e, :ounced them, convicted of .he On entering the Rev. G e° te hie )aching the er aloud. 66 1 after be n;c0 0- seat, 1 01 " 0 0ffag e. g the IA: o t t ltio° 11 the e% ';jer. „ yea in or t he on t `;: e mpe aran r . roo r oe' te ' crowd , ov p „ e diate ,., 'Y p the 6 ' an t 11' 4 After a djuste d s l i 3 ;lY 4ei tt e ad. „ 0 ahapPY th e [nediately, bet 1 • far e far at No g g ' 1 0 ' d e red for ° e ye ( !d, that S9rtbe itlemao o eli f ruing bills ° s ot , .eretarY O i ` tha, .Inderstoo w ot l n the gr°`' to 0 equentlf o p t charade' ed. ) its o redsPeivd al a i ; vas r ec SeP g New' Ate h . e rZ inv - let r 0 sho re ! a , fro e an . .0, tal‘ ifr lisi l g , bills of e " • f e L s one o 4 et 1 1 e , on this fliv t is a n lo ids ar e oel f t 0 sisters %oil ti d relM t4 ' tl of lie they' i2e et the 1 : % L e o ( mediate'Y ers as: it , Ly from toL D Orthsvi th voi it s Vie from Iv!! , 'd era tioi , v et, I L , fe mulct poilie c!cl t be o eP iol t Wall in -6 t 11.10rietic if with P ro cot it to left thioolo, w ith the ,0 rco f m t . ..fte4,4oc• Shortly ,7 0 „, , v ed Vil le that ar conne' t ,ielti l o luct, frot n o ? ot i0 00 , the cro, s or e ot e ly sotigl:`,, eo pe' aunts of ro' f t he P 4 e ra tion 0 , vot a' be Eule, w ili t s o°r ice: r Led 0 - 4r ' if° 3 f Messrs. kAW INTEL LIGENCE. -(THIS 'DAY.) COURT OF CHANCERY. PEMBERTON V. OAKB.S. The COURT heard, during th e morning, the argu ments concl u d ed in this part heard appeal, and then allowed it, but with out costs. Hi s L or d s hi p was satisfied that MrS. Harding, widow of the principal partner o f the Tainworth Bank, at the decease of the a be came a partner in that concern; that he accounts, as far a,k regarded a'security that had been g e „ were made continuous accounts, so that the accounts of the old partnership, and those of the new, were unbroken ; and in this way of viewing it, the b a l ance due at the decease of Mr. Harding, amounting to payments 14,000/ , was discharged by the lttton of that 'had been made after the intro beenhe new partner. The case bad . in this Court for twenty years, and his' p 1, • Lought, if he were to send it to law ne 'w he would be doing gross injustice. It came before the Court now upon exceptions to the Mas te!'s report, upon an appeal from the order of the. Vlc-Chancellor, by which lie had directed to go to ]stye and re upon a ,p et i t i on to confirm the Master ' s port. His LORDSHIP allowed the appeal, overruled the exceptions, and confirmed the Master's report. COURT OF KING'S BENCH. (Sittings in Banco. ) .ThE EINQ V. TAYLOR. The expectation that Mr. Taylor would be brought Alp for judgment morning. Soon after th crowded the Court again this Bench, M r : Lordships took their seats on the seat u stia T i a Y 4 r made his appearance, taking his , under• the box appropriated to the The counsel, and after some motions of course, the c our - enapEn rose ‘ and moved the judgment of )vfx. 1311 °n Rob ert T ay l or . ; °ll G l lAat said, that he thought it his duty _ t k _ He Court, that he was instructed not •n inove for a new trial in the case of the King V. Aayio r. Lord TENTERDEN-011, you are not. Let the Fad' Rand over until Mr. Justice Holroyd comes into Court, at all events. CRIMINAL LNFORMATION. rk tit -.AG V. THE PUBLISHER AND THE. PROPRIETOR OF THE .‘ s t i N. wh This was an application f or a rule to show cause y a criminal information should not be filed against the defendants libel in the " SUN" of the'alst of October, of and , for publishing an alleged concerning the learned gentleman who made the hp plieation. Mr. FRENCII said, I, feel that I ought to apolo gise to your Lordships for so far deviating from the apolo gise rctice . as to undertake to make this motion 111101, and to appear as my own Counsel; but I n ay : not many learned friends in this Court, and r an er .i" s among the few I may find some very learned e " Ingeniou • have been driven to take to enemies. I to 'd c :; r r i s v e by the most atrocious libels, nee' , tlev er calculated me of e ven the means of subsist : have appeared, and never wou ld e e Pear f e -or such a purpose, but that I have eal n COPelled to do it by the 'most malignant en of this sort. The libel of which e° of was published in the SUN News thUser. of plain 31st of October last, and commences going there is a silly gentleman, named Frenc h , lat e r, ;7 14 town, whose eccentrities of mind have Lora -a'en a very deplorable turn." The libel, my cha r runs in this strain of insult and irony, to nne • L and fur with being infor n ,„ 4 : ls hes, I think, ample matter for a criminal the - ( 7 l ' A ". When this calumny was sent forth I t: tion w , -t X , niy whole family was struck with affl . - Of 4 1 4 ; i ti",e sight. Such; my Lords, is a specimen aft er "uels with which I have been assailed, and nie:ti,-at,tire deliberation, I felt that I had no other t 1 1 4 ,11 1" °' s ubstantiating the solidity of my intellect 1 41.71 4161 1 g this course. tis tiee BAILEY—What a ffi davit have *you ? a e ° P r , ten ch— have an a ffi davit of my own, and Paragll3l°loll 4 e. B u t, m y L or d s , the libel contains_ a e - 12 "en more injurious to character than the with I ha ve b e f ore read to you. It charges d • vehin in public g a inst Palg about an in s-ti tnti ad that is de:!erit and resp ec tab l e in the in- Nernni ns of Inv country ; a charge which I most 1 1 3: a,nd p'ositively deny, as a' gross and inju- Nlr. c e° °( l . 4 " th e ' o u t ttice BAyLEY—Your affidavit denies 'that p b ,"er charge. M r . -',Nelt—Yes, my Lord. Partie s , 11The e BAYLEY—And it also states that the '"HIP ro -- Dinst whom you apply are the Publisher M r. 11,'etot of the Newspaper. 1 - 0 4 ,1 Pc ,1 1—It does, my Lord. kr. p.,, N TERDEN—Take a rule, to show cause. to PeR----I have now , my 'Lord, to move for grout e another criminal nformation on the same' L td Tp. N .,, t-')115 --•PanEx—You cannot make two mo t° t° 'do tneees 'ion. It is not the practice for'Coun ' det • Min to d o should be very sorry, my Lord, eri mt , ati that was irregular, but there i s . a becili t °J , to - haul 'how that I am ; afflicted with im them h i ant therefore anxious to convince this moti on rssess strength of mind. Can I make Lord TEN TER row, toyou to mai, turn. Any ) ". —Certainly: It will be open e motion when .t comes to your. of the AT.roli,l'" tic il c via . snAcLL : . e Court O,‘ZGENERAT., moved the judgment usher of the J oh Shackell, the proprietor and for la libel on •--. th r l s i l na Sunday newspaper Lord TENTEnnuN IL ttial, which took s at Guildhall, pee the last At Sitting having read the no . tes . of . the • An affidavit was 211'which he swore tha d to oft'er .. - vile did not intend ... i any injury to the dna t ene t upon seeing t put in (21 1 behalf of the defendant,. th e air . pater he was not aware D -rneter of the prosecutor, 1 . 11 ",:'' It alluded to air. Hartsorn , n nor that it was ON to insinu t i • • f u l to his a e any thing disgrace character. n 4 4 COMMON S —E RORAN , then addressed the v out. in mitigation la ' 1 the - ' e commenced regr,t which the defendant always felt and ma- Mies m t ed at having done an u nintentional injury to L4r Rartshorn •; and call e d on their Lordships to weigh the difference between th e moral crime of an In jury by negligence, and an injury inflicted for the greAlneation of malice. , 0 Trnil! ATTORNEY GENERAL said, that Mr. Harts- A felt he had Performed his duty, and left. the sentence entirely to the Court.He believed that he had, vindicated his ell the foul • sl •by ,_ aracter from the aspen so, cast on it the defendant, and having done bo, ll . e, (the Attorney. General) was not instructed to urge any thing in aggravation. He could not , avoid saying, however, that the man who scattered :Poison negligently, and injured he character of others in a roost wanton manner, lied a bad defence in a Court of. Justice, Lord TENTERDEN said, he had never seen any Person conduct himself prosecution than more prop er l y i n suc h a Mr. Hartshorn. The ATTORNEY -GENERAL said, that his Lord -ship's feeling was acquiesced in by every person who had Pas heard M r . H artshorn give his evidence. He sed through t h e ordeal of this prosecution, and came out with a character untainted. It was his duty F also to add, th a t t h e conduct of iris Learned F r ; end ri (the Common Sergeant) on the trial and aubsequendY certainly was not an aggravati on o f the defendan ' t's guilt, but as to his punishment, that Was Cour t a . matter entirely for the consid erat i on of the The p o katiox S ERGEAN T said, that th e d e f endant indemnitywas ready indemnity, to go to any expence in the way o f After a fe w minutes' consultation, Mr. Justice BAILEY p roceeded to deliver the judgment of . the 1 • Court. H e sa i d, that no one could read the'll 1)e against Mr. H artshorn, without feeling howbitter,l y 1 It mu s t h ave wounded the feelings of that gentle- man. He was indirectly charged with a crime which would have excludedliim from society, and there was no man who would not have felt how dreadful it was that such an imputation should rest on a man for a moment. The defendant had put in an affi davit, stating the absence of malice, and that the paragraphs in question were inserted by inadvert ence.' But was inadvertence an excuse for such a horrible imputation. It might be morally some ex tenuation, but it was none legally. No man would be satisfied with such an excuse in his own case. The affidavit also set forth the manner in which the, business of this paper was managed, and the system called for the reprobation of the Court. It appear ed that the defendant received a manuscript copy of the libel, and that the manuscript was destroyed. Now such a system was calculated on every occa sion to screen the malicious libeller, and to make the party who was inadvertently guilty of inserting the malice liable to the penalties. If the proprietor of this paper should ever again be brought into a Court of Law, charged with the publication of a libel, he hoped it would appear that the system of destroying the manuscripts would not be persevered in. The Court was disposed to take into considera tion all the mitigating circumstances pointed out in the conduct of the defendant subsequent to the pub lication of the libel. His conduct, and the course pursued by his Counsel under his instruction, cer tainly offered nothing like an aggravation of the offence. The Court considered _that the brunt of the offence was negligence and inadvertence, and distinguished that from the graver offence of delibe rate malignity ; but he repeated; that to send so dreadful an imputation through the world, against the character of an innocent man, was an offence of great magnitude. In the opinion of the Court, the prosecutor had acted most - properly in bringing this prosecution, and he (Justice Bailey) hoped the gentleman and his friends would find solace and satisfaction during the remainder of their• lives, in the testimony of , approval given by the Learned Lord (Tenterden) who tried the case. Mr. Hartshorn's character was fully vindicated, and it now only remained to declare the judgment of the Court, which was, that the defendant, Edward Shackel, should pay a fine of SOO/. to the King, and remain in the custody of the Marshal of the Mar shalsea until that fine was paid. Lord TENTERDEN intimated in the course of the day that the Court would take new trials to-morrow and Saturday, instead of going into the special paper. The motion for the judgment of the Court on Mr. Taylor still stands over. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (Sittings in Banco.) The COURT, with the exception of the Lord Chief Justice, disposed of several special pleas of no general interest, and adjourned at half-past twelve. — Mr. Justice Gazelee then proceeded to sit at Nisi Prins at Guildhall. ' COURT OF EXCHEQUER. The Barons engaged on special pleas, none of which were of any public interest. THE MARKETS.(THIS DAY.) HAY MARKETS.—(A ST. JA. • ' .f. s. X. s. X. s. X. s. Lowland Mead. Hay 3 10 to 4 5 Clover Hay 4 4t06 0 Upland Ditto 4 0 5 0 Oat Straw 1 6 110 Rye-grass Hay 4 0 5 0 Wheat Ditto llO 112 New Meadow Hay 3 10 . 4 10 A fur average supply, and a sluggish trade, at Tuesday's prices. t per Load of 36 Trusses.) MESS. S. -C. A. Clot/. Hay generally 4 10 to 5 15 Do. extra fine 0 0 6 0 Oat Straw 1 8 110 Wheat Ditto llO 113 and prices as last quoted. SMITHFIELD, s. L. s. Lowland Mead. Hay 3 3to 4 0 Upland Ditto 4 0 5 0 Rye-grass Hay 4 0 5 0 New Meadow Hay 315 4 Supply good, trade dull, DUBLIN, TUESDAY, Nov. 20. COURT OF KING'S BENCH. THE ICING AT THE PROSECUTION OF HENRY GRATTAN, ESQ. M. P. v. T. N. EDGEWORTH, AND 1. GURNEY, ESQR,S. The Solicitor-General (Donzaxv) renewed his applica tion in this case for a conditional order for a criminal in formation against the defendants. The application had been made to the Court on a former (lay, but their Lord ships then required that the article which appeared in the Freeman's Journal, and which was alleged by Major Edgeworth as the cause of provocation, should be set forth in Mr. Grattan's affidavit. The SOLICITOR-GZWIRAL now moved upon an amended affidavit, in which the article in question was set forth. He said that Mr. Grattan still swore that he bad no connection with, nor was he at all privy to the publication of this arti, de, further than his being the registered proprietor of the newspaper in which it appeared, and though he felt himself bound to set it out in his affidavit, lie protested against being made accountable for it. He (Mr. Doherty) would read the article for their Lordships, and they would then be able to judge whether it in any manner afforded an excuse for the conduct of the defendants. He here read the arti cle, which was headed " Public Appointments—the Paving Board." . Judge JIBS having looked over the article, said it merely referred in general terms to the Officers of the Paving Board Establishment. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL added, that its censure ap plied solely to those Officers whom a Report ,of the Com missioners, published by direction of tlic Itimse of Com mons, had convicted of improper practices. The name of Major Edgewoith was not even mentioned in it. Mr. Justice JEBB said, one of the sentences might be supposed to allude to all the officers of the establishment ; but, from an antecedent paragraph, it appeared applicable to those officers only who ' had been found guilty of mal practices. There was, therefore, no objection, on the part of the Court, to grant the conditional order. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL - Your Lordships will not apply that accusation to Major Edgeworth, though he may himself, if he thinks proper. COURT—Take a conditional rule. DRURY LANE THEATRE. Mr. Kenny's long-promised comedy, entitled " Forget and Forgive," was last night produced for the first time at this theatre. The plot is compli cated, and in some parts unintelligible, turning chiefly on the emba rr a s sments of Charles Sidney (Mr. )and his sister Lo u i sa (M rs . W. West), have both married contrary to the wishes N a v l h la o ck of their guardian, Sir Gregory Ogle (Mr.W.Beimett.) After the usual surprises and adv en tures—few of which possess any striking claims to novelty—a happy. denouement is brought about to all parties, chiefly through the instrumentality of Rumbold (Mr. Lis ton) who is the • life and soul of the piece ; making his appearanc e in almost every scene, to the asto nishment of all who meet with him so unexpectedly. This . nondescript, who was originally a groom, but had afterwards a large fortune left him, has some ' how er other become' acquainted with Sir Gregory Ogle; andlayingdetected him in an attempt to seduce Georgians, his niece, though unknown to be such at the time (Miss E. Tree), compels him, on a threat of exposure, to be reconciled to Louisa and Charles Sidney. This, with some hesitation, is granted, and both parties mutually forget and for give each other. The best scene in this rather prosy comedy, is the one where Liston in disguise, watches the " amorous conduct of Sir Gregory ;" it was received with great applause. All of the performers went through what little they had to do, with abi lity; and the piece was given out for repetition, with the moderate approbation of a full house. At pre sent, however, it is sadly too long, and needs very •severe curtailment. The female body fomid near London Bridge, yesterday, has been proved not to be that of the wretched woman who threw herself from Waterloo Bridge on Friday morning• DARING ROBBERy.--This morning, about ten o'clock, a country man , w h o was standing opposite St. Dunstan's Church to see the men strike the hour, had his pocket picked of sixty pounds, in country and Bank of England notes. There is no doubt that more than one person was concerned in the robbery, as he says that two men were particularly obliging in pointing out when the figures would strike7-but so dexterous were the thieves, that he bad no idea of his loss, until after purchasing some articles at a shop in the Strand, he put his hand in his pocket to pay for them, when he found his money was gone. FASHIONABLE AND MISELLANEOUS. WINDSOR, Nov. 21.—Yest&day the Bishop of LLANDAFF arrived at the Royal Lodge on a visit to 108 MAJESTY. Sir ANDREW BARNARD arrived also at the Royal Lodge to take his monthly duty in waiting on the Knin.—The KING enjoys excellent health, and never fails taking his daily exercise in his pony phaeton when the weather permits. A Cabinet Council was held at four o'clock yesterday afternoon at the Foreign Office, Downing-street, which was attended by the LORD CHANCELLOR, Marquis .Of LANSDOWNE, Viscount GODERICH, Earl Of CARLISLE, Earl DITIHEY, Viscount PALMERSTON, Lord BEXLEY, Mr. HUSKISSON, the CHANCELLOR of ,the Excimurn, Mr. CHARLES GRANT, Mr. WYNN, Mr. STURGES BOURNE, and Mr. TIERNEY. The Ministe►s continued sitting for two lionrs Previous .to the assembling of the Cabinet Ministers, the Duke of IVELLINGToN had a long interview with Viscount GODERICH and Mr. HuaKissoN, at the Colonial Office ; his Grace's Military Secretary, Lord FITZROY SOMERSET, transacted business at the Foreign and Colonial Offices. His Grace the Duke of DEVONSHIRE• and suite, accompanied by the Viscountess EusToN, and Mr. CHARLES GRANVILLE, hono4red the Adelphi Theatre last night with their presence, and appeared highly grati fied with the performance. The Earl FITZWILLIAM, Hon. F. Pox- SONEY, and H. PFARCE, Esq. arrived on Monday night in Liverpool, and took up. their residence at the King's Arms 'Hotel, where they intended remaining a few days before they proceeded to Dublin, Yesterday a Court of Directors was held at the East India-house, when the following Captains were sworn into the command of their respective ships, viz.—Capt a i n Josh Alwrcrombie Robinson, for Bombay and China; and Captain J. 0. M'TAccaRT,. Sir David Scott, for Bengal and China. CHELTENHAM AMATEUR THEATRICALS.' —Colonel BERKELEY has lately 'appeared at the Chelien hiim Theatre a Wellborn (in a New Way to Pay Old Debts) to his brother, Captain AUGUSTUS BERKELEY'S Sir Giles Overreach. The house was crowded, and the performances tolerable. • Amongst our recent arrivals is Capt. FRANK YIN, the celebrated traveller, wbo has recently returned to this country from the overland expedition to the North Pole.—Brighton Gazette. . . . FASHIONABLE ARRIVALS.—The Hon. Keppel Craven, in Pall-mall ; Mrs. and Miss F. Vernon, in Park-street, from Rams g ate ; Captain William Longley, in Burlington-street, from Paris ; Mr. and Mrs: Bennett, in Charles-street, Berkeley-square, from the Isle of Wight ; Lady Caroline Waldegrave, in Curzon-street, Mayrfair ; Lady Drummond Smith, in Piccadilly; Dr. Yeats, M.D. at his house, Queen-street, May-sir, from . Tunbridge. Wells; F. A. Barnard, Esq., at St. James's Palace, from Surrey ; Captain and Mrs. Duffield, in Baker-street, from the Continent; Edward Knight, Esq. and lady, at Warne's Hotel, conduit-street; Herbert, Esq., at Fen ton's Hotel, St. James's-street, from Brighton ; J. Brown low, Esq. at ditto, from Suffolk ; the Dean of Chester, at Miller'S Hotel, Jermyrr-street, from Oxford ; Mr. Mrs. and Miss Polhill, at the St. George's . Hotel, Albemarle street, from Kent ; G. Heneage, Esq., at; the Burlington Hotel, Old Burlington and Cork-streets, from Lincoln shire; Mr. and Mrs. Wyndham, at ditto, from Wilts ; the Rev. L. De Burgh, at Mivart's Hotel, Lower Brook street, from Drayton ; J. Holding, Esq., at ditto, from Kent. . . DDPARrtnum.—Captam Henry Scott, for Chatham ; Mrs. and Miss Meredith, for Bath ; Mr. M. Drummond, for Tile House, near Denham, in Bucking hamshire ; Captain and IVlrs. Grey, for Chatham ; Mr. D. Vincent for Lilly Hill, Berkshire ; Mr. Walte r Long, for Presham House, near Aylesbury; Mr.and Mrs. Littleton, from their house in Grosvenor-place, to their seat, Teddes ley, Staffordshire ; Lady Julia Howard, from her house in Park-street, for her seat in Herta ; Captain Gilpin, from Warne's Hotel; Captain Harvey, R.N. front the British Hotel, Jermyn-street, for. Portsmouth; J. Boswell, Esq. from ditto, for Bedford ; Mr. and Mrs. Thotitas Clifton, from the St. George's Hotel, for Brighton ; Mr. and Mrs, Leigh and Miss Moseley, from the Burlington Hotel; fbr Cheshunt : Mrs. Livesay, from ditto, , for Kent ;' Miss Bell, from ditto, for Kent; John Poulett, Esq., from Mivart's Hotel, for the North ; Capt. Locke, from ditto. CHANGES: Lord Ashley, from Aberystwith, for Renton Castle ; Major, White, from Lymington, to Bath ; Viscount Milton, at his seat, Mortimer House, Northamptonshire, from a tour. ARRIVALS AT BATll.—Lordf.etmox, fan. Mrs. J. Curzon, Lid} , . Willonatitiy,' Lady M`Leod, Lady Bolton and family, Sir Charles Forbes, Sir T. C. Bowey and family ; Colonels Dyke, Wylde ; Captains Wallace, Scott, Morris, Duce, Wylde, Digby, Roberts, Dalzell, Maude, Barrett ; Lieutenants Clay, ThibbS ; Dr. Wood- ! forde ; Rev. 'Messrs. Harding, Rogers, Bradney, Stafford, Smith ; 111r.and Mrs. Parks, Sloman, Crucknell, Broomley, Myers, Tindal, Watts, Bishop, Goddard, Huntley, Sim mons, Eloire, l lilt ; Messrs. Kelly, Hare, Baillie, Elton, Grote, Marks, Wilmot, Wilton, Baines, Catherell, Bird, Watts, Locke, Townley, Bowen, May, Deering, Free man, Spier, Harming, Jarman, Ponsonby, Thurston, Templar, Unthank, Denison, Viner, Green, Scott, Mil liker, Starling, Warren, Horne, Haworth ; Mistresses Robinson, Clarke, Strode, Fonrke; }Leyland, Wright, Ross, Huddlestane, Barnard, Clay, Adams, Torriano and family, Pollock, Sumner, Hutcheson ; Misses Drake, Lee, BU chanan, Woodforde, Bennett, Estwarte; Fooke, Green, Lane, Strange, Pollock, Unthank,Dannett, Robinson, &c. ARRIVALS AT CIIELTENIEAM.—LOrd A. Chichester, Lord F. Chichester, Le Baron de Massone, Sir Edward and Lady Bankes, Colonel Hicks, Lieutenant Colonel Macdougall, Major Gore, Major W. Mills, Rev. J. Mainwaring, Rev. J. H. Bradney, Rev. Mr. and Mrs. Johnson,. Captain Beaty, Captain Blake, Captain Van, Captain Sandwith, Captain Spencer Vassall, Captain and Mrs. Stevenson, Captain and Mrs. Watson, Mr. and Mrs. Mullins, Mr. and Mrs. Wilson and family, Mr. and Mrs. Hesketh,. Mr.. and Mrs. H. B. Maxwell, Mr. and Mrs.. Price; Messrs. A. F. Berkeley, Bankes, Boyd, M.P. and family, Wade, Coen, 11. Murray, T. Murray, Beacken, Sheepshanks, J. Brodie, Reid, H. Puckle, T. F. Ireland, F. Pike, T. Grime, E. Shewell, A. C. King, liolford, ' Clemens, C. Holland, W. Wemyss, Carey, two Hartleys, LindOw, Fadler, Norton, De Visme, Riscon, Stenson, T. flibbert, W. Browne, Paul, Holmes, Hill, Weston, Walters ; Mistresses Hony, Greenway, Chetham Strode, Plampin, Watson; T. Hibbert, Hicks, Cowper, Moore, Atkins, Richards, J. Willis; Misses -North, Hughes, Pike, Vassall, Thompson, &c. &c. ANECDOTE. OF TIIE LORD HLGII AD MIRAL.—In the early period of the siege of Gibraltar, when the . Duke of CLARENCE (then Prince:F.l4lam HENRY) was there, and had made his first naval essay in its relief, the Spanish Admiral, Don JUAN DE ',ANGARA, on visiting Admiral DIGIBY, was introduced to his ROV.AL HIGHNESS. During the conli,renee between the Admirals the Prince retired, and wlien it was intimated that Don Jtrax wished to return, his ROYAL IlmiiNF.ss appeared in the uniform of a midshipman, and respectfully informed the Admiral that the boat was ready.. The Spaniard was astonished to see the son of his Britannic MAJESTY acting in the .capacity of an inferior officer, and emphatically ob served to Admiral DICEY, " Well dues Great Britain merit the Empire of the seas, when humble stations in her navy are filled by princes of the blood." Mr. PEEL'S PIIILANTIIROPY.—At a public dinner lately given at Lewes, Sir .JOHN SHELLEY, in al luding to Mr. PEEL, took occasion to observe that " the reason of Mr. PEEL, taking up his residence at Maresfield, was the desire of dcing good' to that neighbourhood and the borough of Lewes."--N.B. If this be really the case, why did not Mr. PEEL take up his residence in Ireland? That cOuntry stands much more in need of his philanthropy th a n the "Borough of Lewes.' On Wednesday night, the 15th instant, Mr. eh y or L t od ti g m e, e ß p a re tt v e i r o se us a l , y (w )7 h s o u s s e pee ga t i ii d i e g i: l f i r a o d m be t e h n e niG•oobuisbneeEdo'fobtfuhtSeuadrorsgs and other suspicious circumstances, that some improper p ersons were in his g rounds, p roceeded to a the kitchen-garden, at some distance, ,adi''ining f or the purpose of being s a tisfied, when, meadow from his no use, hearing some voices,- lie called to know who they were, and receiving no answer, he immediately fired a musket loaded with slugs in the direction where he supposed the parties were, when some one cried out, as he supposed wounded, and an apparent bustle took place to escape. The night was very dark, and Mr. Guns, who was alone, not know ing how many he might have to encounter if he followed them, thought it • most prudent to return home. On examining the spot the next morning, a quantity of blood , was found, and traced to some considerable. distance ; and although every endeavour has been used to find out the person shot, he has not as yet been i d tno e rse establishot a n n se d ti th e a p n o tti licz: jo re tio o o n itoheth parish alert, d t discovered. We un to h iv e t o i s t e e is o tintended to establish an aasoistion in the parish to prosecute felons, consequ ence of the robberies committed in that neigh btiuxhood. PRIVY COUNCIL, 'WHITEHALL, Nor. 20. COMPULSORY MANUMISSION OF SLAVES. The Lords of the Council: present were Lord Bexley, the Hon. J. Abercromby, Sir Hugh Eliot;' Sir James Mackintosh (who attended the Council for the first time since he was sworn in), and Mr. Wilmot Horton. Mr. GreVille attended as Clerk of the Council. The Council was occupied with the petition of the principal planters of Demerara and Berbice, agaiast the orders of the local Governments there for the compulsory manumission of slaves—orders which were founded on the instructions sent out by . Lord Bathurst in 1826. Messrs. Adam and . Hibbert called witnesses in su pport of the petition, and the Com Mon Sergeant and Sergeant Bosanquet attended to cross-examine on behalf of the Protector of Slaves in these Colonies —an officer appointed to look after their manumission under the new orders. Mr. Hindman, the proprietor of an estate in De- merara, was examined on Monday; his evidence went principally to show the almost imposSibility, under the existing circumstances of the colony, to carry the Order of Council into execution, particularly on the Sugar estates. Mr. Macrea was examined this day, and gave testimony to a similar effect. This witness was very ably examined by Mr. Wilmot Horton, in answer to whose questions lie stated, that during the last . twe nty years civilization had increased rapidly among the Slaves, which had made them more valuable to their masters; but his opinion was, that their ma numission would not tend to increase this spirit of civilization. Mr. W. HORTON—You have stated that it would be detrimental to the planters that Slaves should be allowed to purchase the freedom of their children—, What detriment would it prove ?—lt would deterio rate the value in a great degree. .Mr. HoaToN—How long do you think it will,be before such a state of things will arise, from the pro gress of natural circumstances in these colonies, as would render it advantageous to the masters to ma numit their Slaves ?—I do not think such circum stances could arise for a very considerable time; for several centuries. Mr. Alexander M‘Donald was ,the next witness examined. His testimony went principally to show, that the mode of appraising the value of thnslaves previous to manumission, would not enable the Protector to arrive at a sound conclusion, as he was of opinion the slave would endeavotti to depreciate his value; that he might be manumitted for a less sum: It was his opinion, that from the great com petition in the, Brazils and Cuba, in, producing sugar, the only means the colonial planter had of meeting them was by making use of improved ma chinery ; and that if any diminution in the number of slaves should take place on the estates, they could not be profitably employed. He knew, in the ab sence of, a proper division of labour, from conversa tions with the proprietors of estates in the West Indies, with, whom, as Secretary to their Commit tee, now formed in London to watch over their in terests, he was in constant communication, that a considerable depreciation of the value of that species of property had. taken place in the market within the last few years; and declared his opinion, that that depreciation had arisen from the general proceed ings of the Legislature, with regard to West India property, and that among them the principal was the recent orders of Lord Bathurst. Lord BEXLEY.—What , would you recommend to the Legislature as a means of getting free labour in these colonies, in place of that of the slaves who would ,be manumitted ?—I would recommend the enactment of a vagrant „Lord BEXLEY.—Of what kind ?—To appropriate the land to the free. slaves, and compel them to pay rent for it instead -of allowing them, as at present, to occupy it gratuitously; to compel them to labour, by not allowing them to subsist upon wild animals. Mr. HORT O N-1f you are of opinion that such a measure as you recommend would be productive of advantage, by accelerating the period when free labour would be forthcoming, do you not think that is a circumstance within the power of the Legisla ture to accomplish ?—Yes ; and I am of opinion the proprietors themselves : would be the .first to take advantage of it, by employing free labourers. Mr. 1 - 10amoN—If the Legislature have determined by their resoltitions, passed unanimously, to put an end to slavery, and that these clauses for compulsory manumission be found inadequate to accomplish that object, what alternative do you see between the continuance of slavery and the purchase at once by the nation of the property of the Demerara proprie tors ?—I have stated that a fair opportunity of ob taining free labour has never yet been made by the Legislature, and that until it is, no opinion can be made as to the alternative of its nature. Mr. HORT6N.—Can you state the earliest period at which the mode you have recommended would produce the' effects you contemplate ?—lf all the land were appropriated, and the free slaves prevent ed from holding any of it without paying rent, I con ceive the time would be comparatively short at which it would arrive, but I cannot state what precise pe riod would be required. • Mr. HORTON.—Can you at all give an opinion as , to the probable time that would be required to have sufficiency of free labour ?—From the course of mo:.' dent religious instruction now in progress, by which it is to be hoped that a very great change will take place in the negro character, it is very probable that, before long, he may be made an industrious man, willing to labour for his suPport. Mr. HoRToN—If a maximum of price were to be struck, at which the slave should be freed, would that have the effect of making him industrious ? That would remove some of the principal objections to the compulsory manumission ; but lam not at present prepared to state what its general operation would be. Lord BEXLEY—Can you tell how much the value 'of West India property has been depreciated by the order of compulsory manumission ?-1 - cannot put a per tentage on the deterioration, but will state facts within my own. knowledge. In 1821 and 1822 a property there was sold for 80,0001.; the same pro. petty was recently put up for sale, and there was no bonefide bidding for it higher than 30,0001. Sir J. MACKINTOSH—What reasons have you for stating that one of the principal causes of the depre ciations yc,a have described, is the existence of the compulsory clauses for manumission ? I have heard persons say, who have West India property, that this law makes their title an interest of. a temporary nature, and no person would wish to embark his capital in a falling concern. `Witnesses were .then called to prove the deprecia tion of property, in consequence of the recent orders of the Councils of Demerara and Berbice. • (The Council adjourned till this day , wheuit was understood. that Major Moody, one of the Commis sioners sent o u t recently to Africa, will be exaMineda NOVEMBER 21. This morning the Lords of the Council re-as sembled.at the Council-office at. 11 o'clock, agreeably to the adjournment the preceding, day. The same Lords of the Council were present as at the former meetings. Lord Bexley officiated as Lord Poii (lent, the DUke of Portland being abroad. Mr. ADAM stated, he had only one more witness to pro duce in oppositiorr to the ordinance foUnded upon the Order in .Council issued in the year 1824, for the regulation of the slave's of the islands of Deme rara and Berbi ye. Mr. Serjeant Bosanquet and the Common Ser jeant were asked if they were prepared with evidence to rebut that of the witnesses who had been examined to prove that the enforcement of the ordinance was impracticable, and could not be carried into execution. The Learned Gentlemen replied that they were not prepared with any witnesses, but merely attended to cross-examine the witnesses. It was proposed that Mr. Adam should sum up, and Serjeant Bosanquet and the Common Serjeant should be heard in reply, if they thought p ro per. Upon this proposition, Counsel and strangers were ordered to withdraw s and were re-admitted in the space of a quarter of an hour, and were then in formed that their Lordships had agreed to the pro posed arrangement. Mr. WlLittor. HORTON declared that he had made every posSible exertion to procure witnesses in sup port of the Order in Council, but had not been able to procure one : if any gentleman could procure any, the books and papers of the Colonial-office should be open to them. Mr. ADAM then called Major Moody, whose exa mination occupied between two and three hours ; the substance of the evidence of the Major,'who had been a resident in Demerara and Berbice for a con siderable time, was, that 'the enforcement of the or dinance founded on the Order in Council would en danger the property of the planters ; that it was im possible to put a value on the Slaves. If a law was passed,' although inoperative, if the Slaves undei. stood it, he dreaded the consequences. If twenty Slaves were taken out of two hundred who were employed on an estate, the cultivation could not be carried on: Soon after two o'clock in the afternoon their Lord ships adjourned. PORTSMOUTH CANAL. Many years ago the late Mr. Rennie projected a canal from London to Portsmouth. In the autumn of 1824, a proposal for a ship canal between the same points was laid before five or six gentlemen by Mr. Elmes, who stated that the idea of a ship canal had originated with his father some years be fore. , Mr. Elmes produced at the same time a print-. ed prospectus, containing a rough estimate, and a detail of the supposed advantages. The gentlemen in question thought it prima facie worthy of atten tion and inquiry, and devoted a considerable por tion of • time and money to procure every species of public return and private inforniation which could throw light upon the subject and assist them in coining to an estimate of the probable revenue of the work if carried into execution. Feeling that so magnificent a national work ought not to be brought forward upon any insecure foundation, they deter mined to abstain from advertising, or calling in any way on the public for money, until something satisfactory and incontrovertible should be esta blished on this head. When they had been thus employed for several weeks, a placard appeared in various parts of the city, announcing that Mr. Nicholas Wilcox Cundy would, in a few days, submit to the public a prospectus for a grand ship canal from , London to Arundel Bay. It may not be immaterial to remark, that this placard was printed by the same person who had printed the prospectuses for Mr. Elmes, and whom Mr. Elmes had in the mean time, for some reason, quitted for another printer; and it should be observed, that the book which Mr. Cundy has put forth contains three distinct papers, which he calls reports, the second and third of which have the date of a specific month, while to the first are simply affixed the word and figures " London, 1824." The gentlemen who had entertained Mr. Elnses's proposition had now no course left but to advertise at once and take posses sion of the ground. The consequence was, that they received numerous applications for shares, which were duly registered ; but adhering to their original determination of not idly possessing them selves of other people's money, they altogether re fused receiving deposits which were in many in stances pressed upon them. After several meetings all of them strictly private (except for the unexpec ted appearance of Mr. Cundy at one of them, where nothing was done), a committee of six noblemen and gentlemen undertook the provisional manage ment; and as by this time several different lines had been suggested by several different projectors, it was agreed to insert an advertisement in the papers, stating that no conclusion could be formed until a preliminary survey had been made by competent en gineers, for which purpose the kr essrs. Rennie had been selected : that consequently subscriptions (not deposits) of 1/. each would be received to effect this object; and that each person sub scribing such sum of 11. should be entitled (not compelled) to take 'tip• ten shares 'ins the con cern, if, in consequence of the inquiry so instituted any company should thereafter be formed. So much time, however, had been consumed in the previous investigations, that all relish for speculations of any sort was gone by, and only about 2201, was sub scribed, of which 1001. was given by one of the committee, Mr. Wilson, then Member for the city of London. Still the survey was very liberally completed by Messrs. Rennie, with the able assist ance of Mr. Giles ; and we are now enabled to lay before our readers the report which those gentle men haie made to the committee, the names of which committee, being Lord Palmerston, Sir Geo. Cockburn, Sir J. Brenton, Mr. Manning, Mr. Wil son, and Mr. Twiss, have been copied Ly Mr. Candy into his book, as if that committee had been acting in adoption of any designs of his ! Our readers will perceive by Messrs. Rennie's report, that whereas Mr. Cundy, in his book, asserts roundly that Messrs. Rennie and Mr. Giles confirm him in every yarti cular, and state that his line, by Dorking, is the preferable one, they distinctly condemn it, on the score of the natural difficulties, and of the enormously extra expence with which it would be attended. Mr. Cundy's book is so complete an answer to itself, that to any mind capable of the most moderate reflection .no other need be given ; but we know not with what `face to recommend our readers to expend 10s. upon it, unless, indeed, any one contemplated subscribing for shares,•and then the purchase would be a cheap one. As to the original supporters of the measure, it only remains to say, that perceiving the time gone by for such matters, and feeling that it was impos sible to raise the immense sum of money required, 'even on the cheapest plan, without , extensive aid from Government which it was not disposed to af ford, their abandoned all notion of it for the present, took every farthing of the expence incurred upon ,themselves, and left the 2204, which had remained untouched, to the inadequate remuneration of the survey. They altogether disclaim any participation in the extraordinary statementr, which Mr. Cundy has from time to time ;o.ut forth, and in the adver tisement for deposits which is at present going the round of the papers. At the same time, they wish it to be tmderstood that they are sensibly alive to the immense importance - of the project; that they believe in its practicability ; that the result of their, calculations justified an expectation of about 5 per cent.* in time of peace, with a material increase in time of war, upon a capital of six millioms and a half, being the smallest amount for which the Messrs. Rennie estimate that the work could be executed; 4nd that at any mo men t more f avoura bl e tq its execution, they are. in a condition to aid it with the produce of their labours. London, October 12, 1827. In consequence of the resolutions passed, at a meeting held at Mr. Freshfield's in the spring of 1825, for the purpose of considering the practica bility of forming a grand canal between London and Portsmouth, capable of receiving the largest class of vessels, we were requested to make Et survey of the whole of the intervening country in order to ascCr tain the practicability of the undertaking, and to in vestigate the merits of the different lines proposed for the same by Messrs. Cundy, Elutes * and Morris ; and, lastly, whether any other line could be found which, under all the circumstances of the case, should be more eligible than any of those proposed, and which would be most likely to meet the object in - view. We accordingly employed Mr. Francis Giles to take the necessary levels and survey, and it is but due to him to esy, that he has discharged the arduous trust imposed on him with great judgment; and we have subsequently explored the country in person, and now beg leave to lay before you, for the information of the various parties concerned, the re sult of our observations. A goad communicati on b y inland nav i gat i on be tween London and P ortsmouth h a s long been an Mr. Cundy says the revenue will be 700,0001. pet annum, and the cost will not exceed four millions, thus producing 17/ per vent, per annum! object of imalortonee, and, as far hack as the year 1800, the lag" Mr. Rennie turned his attention to the subject; so that, in addition to the present in vestigation, the whole line of country has been well examined,' so as to - enable us - to - deScribe with tolerable precision the best line for the proposed canal, together with the comparative merits of all the other lines. There are five lines through .which a canal be tween London and Portsmouth may be made; first, commencing with the river Darer; which enters the Thames below Dartford, and continuing up the valley, and crossing the summit near Westerham, Smallfield-place, and Limpsfield, and continues from thence by Horsham, Slinfold, to Pallinghain Quay, where it enters the vale of the river 'Arun, and con tinues from thence by Arundel to Portsmouth, either inland or through Langston and Chichester har bours. The highest point of this summit is about 500 feet above the level of high water of spring tides, and the total distance from the Thames to Portsmouth harbour, besides the river navigation, is above 100 miles. This line, with the exception a the great height of the summit, is favourable, but the extra length, and enormous expence of cutting through the summit, render it unadvisable within any wioderatemeans. • _ _ The second line departs from the river Thames, near Greenwich, and pursues the vale of the Ravens bourne, from thence by Croydon to Dlerstham Gap, by Smitham Bottom, where it crosses the summit, which is about 430 feet above the level of the tide, and continues from thence by Stha Horsham, and Slinfold, to Pallingham 'Quay, where it enters the vale of the river Arun, and continues from thence to POrtsmouth harbour by the same route as the other. The' total distance from Dept ford to Portsmouth is about 100 miles. This line is very favourable, for, after passing through the sum mit, to cut through which, however, would be a very expensive operation, a 1041 of 50 miles might be obtained 'witho u t a lock, very little, if any, valu able property would be interfered with, except im mediately near GreenwiCh and Deptford. This is the line chosen by Mr. Elmes for an open canal without locks, which is proposed to be effected by cutting down to the level of the tideway, and to ad mit all the rivers and streams from the country through which it is intended to pass. This scheme would be almost impracticable on account of the enormous expence, and 'when executed would not answer the purpose, as it would be either dry - in summer, or flooded in winter, and consequently unfit for navigation ; and, if it is to be executed at all, should be made with locks and reservoirs. The third line departs from the Thames, Deptford, near the entrance of the Grand Surrey Canal, and continues from thence by Kennington, Streatham, Merton, Leatherhead, Dorking, Holmwood-common, Ockley, Pallingham-quay, and Arundel ; from thence, by the same route as the others, to Ports mouth-harbour; the distance by this line would be. about 83 miles from London to Portsmouth, and the height of the summit near Dorking, is 382 feet above the tideway. The expence of reducing the summit to about 120 feet above the tide level, as 'proposed by Mr. Cundy, in order to reduce the lockage and. ensure a constant supply of water, would be, like the other summits, a most serious operation. This might be redUced by keeping a level of 80 feet higher, but even then,' the cutting of this would . still be very great : or by keeping more to 'the lower range of the country, to the east of Holmwood-common ; but then the length would be increased about three miles, and, after all, the cutting would still be a very considerable operation. This Is the line which has been chosen by Mr. Cundy. The fourth !hie projected by Mr. Morris between Dorking and Ockley, by the way of Wotton and Abinger, instead of Holrnwood-common, is only a diversion from Mr. Cundy's, which is higher above the tideway, and consequently more objectionable.. In consequence of the objections to the various lines above stated, we continued our researches, irs order to find out another line which might be more eligible; and in this we hope we have been success ful, namely,— The fifth line, whiekeemmences at the Thames near Deptford, and continues from thence by Ken nington, Malden, Chessington, Eps om - common , to Guildford, from thence to the summit of the coun try, between the Wey and Arun rivers, near Alford,• which' is only 174 feet above the tideway, or 208 below that. of Dorking. From thence to Lox Wood Palliugham-quay, where it- follows the vale of the river Arun, and continues from thence, by Arun del, to Portsmouth, in the same line as the others. The total length of this line would be a b ou t 86 miles, an 4 the country, upon the whole, very favonr 7 Able. By assuming a level of 120 feet aboVe the tide, the summit might be passed with tolerable fa cility, as the difficulties before encountering it would be comparatively trifling ; and by this line a-level of 26'milei, without a lock, at only 120 feet above the tide, would be obtained; whereas, by the Dorking line, a level of only seven miles would be obtained, with a length of 200 feet above the tide, and that at an enormous extra expellee. Upon the whole, therefore, considering all these circumstances, ~ the line by Guildford appears preferable to any of the others. The above are leading features of the scheme : but if ever it should be carried into effect, various collateral branches might be made to it to connect. different places together, with docks, entrance basins, and harbours, which at present it would be prema ture to enter upon. With regard to obtaining the proper supply of water to feed the lockage, by assuming a summit sufficiently, and compensating the mill-owners of the different streams which would be intercepted, and ma int iti ng properheadjoinsihaed high h reservoi drains, country, ra we have and y feed ers, in ryi d i t e t r i s, e doubt but that it would be obtained. With regard to the sum that would be necessary to carry such a gigantic -undertaking into effect, so as to accommodate the largest vessels, wo feel consi derable difficulty in giving a decided opinion, for it embraces such a variety of subjects, besides the making of the canal ; such as the value of the land (which for eight or ten miles out of London, for the most part, must be taken as building ground), Houses, compensations to trill-owners, and variety of other points to have obtained, which correctly would have occasioned a much greater expenditure than we feel ourselves warrante d to enter upon. We have entered, ho wever , i n t o t h e l ead i ng points, and are satisfied' that if the line by Guildford should be adopted, a sum not less than 6,000,000/. to 6,500,000/. would be required. If, however, the line by Dorking should be adopted, a much larger sum would be necessary. Before any thing, how ever, is decided with regard to a subject of .such importance, the whole should be more thoroughly investigated. (Signed) GEORGE and JOHN RENNIE. —,. --- .-----„ RUNNING IvIATcH.—An excellent running match took place at seven o'clock yesterday morning iu N t . James's Park, CHARLES LgliNox (the gentleman who runs a match of 200 yards next Saturday , against . GEORGE WEsr) unde r t a ki ng , for a bet of ten sovereigns, to run round the railing in six minutes. He started very fast, ,thaemmaongnor, :aid about 50 yards before coming in, ' opposite the Bird cage-walk, in jumping over a bill of dirt he fell ; he was on his legs again immediately, but ultimately lost . the match by 42 seconds, Betting was 5t04 in his favour ; sovereigns, and sceptre and but for his fall lie would certainly have won the match. The gold and silver coins found some time ago, when taking down one of the old houses, the property ti;em C the no w corpo alld o part ret o of be t s h o e ld si i t n e o l o f til o b r y p a n u s Christi ction, d n C r li n l College s Cam bridge,next week. 'They were found in two earthen pots,*the one full )f silver, the other of gold coins, and had evidently been in currency; the first pot contained shillings, sixpenco, and minor coins, even to silver halfpennies ; the other contain ed gold, whole, half, quarter pieces of King JAitics ; the whole consists of more tbs 500 pieces. it is supposed to have been co ncea l e d o, o _ lll the time of ()mum CRoMwELL . m an , . shout:, y claimants ar o ,, e . the C - &lege, and the Crnwn ; upon investigation the right be i n t h e Crown, who gave it up .to tb _proved to e College . : and u ra p t o io n n th of e discoveryantbridgeo! ti e s L tr o e r a d s treasure, !'or this favour 1221 . were a c t ua l] y paid for fees ! ! !—Suf folk Herald.