The Sun. — London, England, 1834-03-21 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. There are some ugly symptoms beginning to show themselves, and we grieve to say, in both houses of parliament, with regard to the con victed boroughs. As the bills for enlarging the constituency of Hertford and Warwick, for the total disfranchisement of Stafford, and for that of a portion of the Liverpool electors, have advanced in their progress through the House of Commons, the advocates of corruption ap pear to have recovered from their stupor, to have resumed their ancient system of party tac tics, and to have got up a show of opposition to all the above measures for defending the future purity of election in the towns alluded to, as a mask to the more serious resistance meditated in the lords, that the majority of the latter assem bly may not be chargeable with any thing quite so odious to the people of England as the defeat of bills protective of the rights both of constituents and representatives ; on behalf of which the House of Commons had been unanimous. There is reason to suspect the recent opposition to these bills, as we have already said, to be but a preliminary manoeuvre or precursor of the more successful and more fatal hosti lity of the Upper House of Parliament to an unfettered discharge of its duties by the elective power of the nation. It is obvious at first sight, that the branches of the consti tuency which have thus disgraced themselves, and frustrated, to a certain point, the great ob ject of a representative system, are those left either totally or partially unreformed by the bill of 1832, and that the measures for their entire disfranchisement, or for their purification by an admixture of a better class of voters, are no more than necessary supplements to the law of re form, and beneficial applications of that prin ciple, the enforcement of which Lord Grey professed to be his most cogent motive for ac cepting the office of Prime Minister. We do not permit ourselves to doubt for a moment the continued zeal and solicitude of that noble Earl for the fulfilment of every promise compre hended under his original pledge, that Parliament should be thoroughly reformed, and corrupt in fluence effectually rooted out. It is, therefore, notwithstanding any sinister appearances, our full persuasion that Lord Grey will afford his honest and uncompromising aid to the passing of the disfranchisement bills through the House of Lords ; and will not, by weak or ambiguous concessions to the views of Tory jobbers, bring into question his own fidelity to that public cause of which he has claimed to be the patron. The fact is, however, that the cause of reform needs no longer the pa'ronage of Lord Grey; and that if, through careless inconsistency or timid vacillation, his Lordship should present himself to the people of England as indifferent, or worse, to the fate of those bills, by which corrupt constituencies are to he purified or pu nished, the desertion can be but a tran sient inconvenience di the reform interest, while to his Lordship's political character and power it will be inevitable death. Lord Grey has no firm support in this country but the peo ple, and the people only, so long as he faithfully serves them. He may, in his perplexities, turn for protection to the Court—the Court ! But be it so ; and what can that avail him ? What ground has the Court itself to stand upon but the affections or esteem of the nation ? Lord Grey may appeal to his own magnificent "order," and in the unfortunate recurrence to a former pledge that he would " stand by them," he may expect that " his order" will stand by him, should his hour of Ministerial agony ar rive. Alas for the noble and venerable earl if such should be his expectation ! Lord Grey ought to be aware that he has already offended, wounded, exasperated the House of Lords past all hope or chance of forgiveness. His Lordship ought to feel—for he has been made to feel this truth more than once. Yet there is a phrase attributed to the noble lord—an old, a hack neyed phrase, and more than any that could be employed, unpalatable to the people of England, such as that " it is his duty to avoid bringing the two houses into collision." We have heard that jargon before ; it was made an instrument for embarrassing and retarding the general Reform Bill in its passage through parliament, and now it is resorted to as an im pediment to the separate bills for completing the work of reform. If the houses should be brought into collision, whose fault is it ? The Home of Commons approve the Disfranchise ment Bills, and Lord Grey and his colleagues allege their own approbation of them. The House of Lords, it is assumed, will try to throw them out. Then, let us ask, who is it that ought to avoid " a collision"—the party opposed to the wishes of the country, or that which boasts of coinciding with them ? Must he who is in the right give way, anti yield the wrong-doer a triumph ? In that case, there is no act of sub servient cowardice that might not be reconciled to the conscience of a weak-minded man. In that case self defence, or the protection of innocence, or the performance of any the most solemn act of justice, might be abandoned, and the offence excused, by the fear of risk or vexation. The language, if—which we cannot believe—it have really been used by Lord Grey, is utterly un worthy of him. It is unworthy of the King's minister to flinch from his duty, lest the dis charge of it should bring him into trouble ; for that, after all, is the meaning of the anxiety to shun a collision of the houses. If the Tory lords feel no such terror, why should the liberal minister Lord Grey, with the whole British nation to support trim ? The way to deter the .Tory peers from a collision, is for Lord Grey to show them that he is not afraid of it. The way to succeed in a just cause, is to set its opponents at defiance. Nothing great, nothing noble, nothing worthy of immortal honour, was ever yet accomplished by sacrificing a prin ciple, in order to conciliate a public enemy.— Times. CACHNIERE SHAWI.S.—The great mart for the wool, of which the shawls are made, is at Kilghet, which is said to be a dependency of Ladak, and situated twen'y days' journey from the northern boundaries of Cashmere. There sre two kinds of it; that which can be rea.tily dyed is white, the other sort is an ashy colour, wh:ch being with thffieully changed, pr at least improved by art, is generally woven of its natural- hue. About two pounds of either are obtained from a single goat once a year. After the down his been carefully separated from the hairs, it is repeatedly washed with rice starch. This process is reckoned important ; and it is to the quality of the water of their valley that the Cactlimerians attrittute inimitable fineness of the fabrics pro f Kilghet the best taw wool is sold for pound. By the preparation and wash loses one-hall; and the remainder being weight of the thread is considered " Shawls are made of various forms, bid' are wrought separately, with the been to the differint markets. Those I to be of the softest and most. delicate ,nil coutarrpanes are lA:it:ate,' of the of th, w001."...../11001/0)/le)y Martin's ifish Cavities. BANKRUPTCY COURT, MARCH 20. (Before Mr. Commissioner FANE.) ALEXANDER AND CO.'S BANKRUPTCY. A meeting of the creditors of this extensive East India agency and banking firm was held to-day for the further proof of debts. . _ Mr. Mauroti appeared to enter claims on behalf of the executors named in the will of the late Colonel Rabou for 70,000 sicca rupees. The facts are shortly these :—The executors of Colonel Rabou sent out, in February, 1831, a power of attorney to Messrs. Alexander and Co., of Calcutta, containing instructions that it was advisable the firm should take out letters of administration in the Ecclesiastical Court of Calcutta. This was done by Mr. Alexander, and the difficulty was that of allowing the bankrupt to prove against his own estate for the p.operty he became executor to in India. Mr. Commissioner FAKE was of opinion that the right of proof vested in the executors, and he directed that a proof for the full amount should be entered upon the pro ceedings. A proof under other circumstances for 29,179 sicca rupees was then tendered on behalf of the executors to the will of the late Mr. Millock. In this instance no ad ministration had been taken out in Calcutta. The COMMISSIONE& could not admit the proof until the authority of the Ecclesiastical Court was shown to authorize it. Mr. HUGHES did not see the necessity of taking out probate here when the property was in another country, and beyond the control of the Diocese of Canto-bury. The COMMISSIONER said the applicant must take out a probate for a debt due by a firm represented by a partner in this country. After some further discussion relative to the liability of executors, situated as those above were, to the probate and legacy dutiei, the Commissioner said as the question was one of considerable importance he should take time to consider it. Ps oafs mere entered on the proceedings to the amount of 138,151 sicca rupees, and claims to the amount of 67.722 sicca rupees. The further proceedings were then adjourned. ecu liar and in d a . At 1 bb k e ice a p 10; ,it lc , • * ;•!"-,:•%, • • upek s ~h . e,,• • p wi tS ral t Il tr:Z9> w h e Brii ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. WESTERN CIRCUIT—DoacHEsTER,MARcaI7. (Before Mr. Baron WILLIAms.) ADMINISTERING UNLAWFUL OATHS. James Lovelace, George Lovelace, Thomas Stanfield, John Stanfield, James Hammet, and James Brine, were indicted for administering and causing to be administered, and aiding and assisting, and being present at, and con ser.ting to administer, a certain unlawful oath and engage ment, purporting to bind the person taking the same not to inform or give evidence against any associate or other person charged with any unlawful combination, or any illegal act done or to be done, and not to discover any illegal oath which might be taken. Mr. GAMBIER. stated that the charge against the pri soners was, that on a certain day in December they, all together, or one of them, administered an unlawful oath to a person of the name of Legg, for the purpose of bind ing the party to whom it was administered not to disclose any illegal combination which had been formed, an.l not to inform or give evidence against any person associated with them, and not to reveal any unlawful oath which might be taken. The learned counsel then proceeded to state the facts of the case to the jury, and called the following wit- nesses : John Lock—l live at H elf Puddle. I went to Toll Puddle a fortnight before Christmas. I know the pri soner James Brine. I saw him that evening at John Woolley's. He c Bled me out, and I went with him. He took me to Thomas Stanfield's, and asked me if I would go in with him. I refused, and went away. I saw hitn in about a fortnight afterwards in a barn. He asked me if I would go to Toll Puddle with him. I agreed to do se. James Hammet was then with him. Edward Legg, Richard Nary, Henry Courtney, and Ellas Rigs were with us. They joined us as we were going along. One of them asked if there would not be something to pay, and one said there would be is. to pay on entering, and id. a-week after. We all went to Thomas Stanfield's house into a room up stairs. John Stanfield came to the door of the room. I saw James Lovelace and George Lovelace go along the passage. One of them asked if we were ready. We said, " Yes." One of them said, "Then bind your eyes,' and we took out our handkerchief.; and bound over our eyes. They then led us into another room on the same fluor. Some one then read a paper, but I don't know what the meaning of is was. After that we were asked to kneel down, which we did. Then there was some more reading ; I don't know what it was about. It seemed to be out of some part of the Bible. Then we got up and took off the bandages from our eyes. We were told to du it. I saw something in the col ner of the room like a picture of death or a skeleton. James Lovelace Vim said, " Remember thy end." Then our eyes were blinded again, and we knelt down again. I had then seen James Lovelace and John Stanfield in the room. Same one read again, but I don't know what it was, and then we were told to kiss the book, when our eyes were unblinded, and I saw the book, which looked like a little Bible. I then saw all the prisoners there. James Lovelace had on a white dress; it was not a smock frock. They told us the rules, that we should have to pay Is. then, and Id. a week after wards, to support the men when they were standing out from their work. They said we were as brothers ; that when we were to stop for wages we should not have to tell our masters ourselves, but that the masters would have a note or letter sent them. I had not money then, but I paid Is. to George Lovelace afterwarde. Cross examined by Mr. BuiT—l have known John Stanfield, llamrnet, and Brine, three or four years. They are labouring men, and have always borne good cha racters. By Mr. DERSISHIRE—Edward Legg was one of the parry. I can't say that he was not the man who read. By the JUDGE—The dress Lovelace hid on was more like a surplice than a sninckfrock. Edward Legg—l saw Brine and Hammet one evening about Christmas in the street. I was in my hou►e, and they called me and said they wanted we. I went,out, and James Brine asked me if I would go with them to Toll Puddle. I asked what fur—whether they were going to swear me to anything, as I heard there was some swear ing going on, but 1 did nut know what it was. He said no ; they wanted to see how many they could get together. I asked if there were any more going. Brine said yes. I asked who, and be told me the names—Lock, Courtney, and Peary. 1 went with Brine, and Hamtnet, and we shortly overtook Lock, Courtney, and P.ary. We went to Thomas Stanfield's, to a room up stairs. The witness gave similar testimony to the last witness, as to the blinding the eyes, and the reading during the time they were blinded. Something war read concerning something of etriking for wages during the time we were kneeling down. We were to strike for wages when others did. They said they meant to strike, and we were to do the same if we liked ; and that our masters would have some note or notice about it. Something was said about Is We repeated words after some one before we kissed the book. It was something about our souls. By the JUDGE-Do you know the word " eternity ?" Witness—Why, I believe that was the word, or some thing near upon wishing our souls might be plunged into that, or something of that sort; that we were to keep it secret, and not to reveal anything that was dune or said there, nor for what purpose we were on, I believe, hut I don't understand much about what they were say ing; we kissed the book directly after we hail repeated the words. 1 think it was James Lovelace who read, but lam not certain of it. When out eyes were unialinded I saw all the prisoners in the room; James Lovelace had on something like a minister's surplice; I saw in a corner a figure something like Death, or something of that sort. They said " We are brothers," and something about society. Cross-examined by Mr. BUTT.—I know Ilammet and Thomas Stanfield; they are respectable hardworking men, as are all the prisoners; never heard a word against any of them. Mrs. Frances Wetham—l am the wife of a painter in the town. In October, last year, James Love'ace and another person came to our shop ; he said he wanted something painted from a design heilad brought; he had two papers with Lim, on one was the representation of a skull, and on the other a skeleton arm extended with a scitlte; be said it was to be painted on canvass, a com plete skeleton on a dark ground, six feet high ; over the head " Remember thine end." I asked them whit it was for, whether a flag or a sign ; he to'd me it was a secret for a society, and he would tell me no more ; it I wanted further information, I was to send to him, " J. Lovelace, Toll Puddle." Cross examined by Mr. DERBISIIIRE have seen a figure of Old Time with a niche in his hand. The de sign was something like that. Charles Clear, apprentice to Wethatn—J. Lovelace came and asked me if the painting was dune. John James Wetham—ln October last I received from my wise the two designs. I did not execute the order. I afterwards saw J. Lovelace. He cane to me and asked if I had done the painting, and said he did not know what to make of it. I told him I could not make it out. Ile said he wanted Death painted six feet high for a society f their owa. I told him I could not have any thing t o do with it. He said it was a secret affair. Cross examined by ➢lr. Burr—l am not a Freemason. I have never beard of a society in London called the Death's Head Society. Cross examined by Mr. DERBISHIRE-There was nothing mutinous or seditious, that I recollect, in the design. John Cox—l am a turnkey of the gaol. George Love lace came to the gaol on the 25th of February. I found in his pockets two papers, a letter, and a small key. These are the papers, and also this printed piper. He asked me if I could not let him have the key. I said "no ;" but I would take care of it until he went out. He then said, "I wish you to take particular care of it." He said this paper was the cause of their being there. R. W. Andrews—Cox gave me a key and two papers. I then thought it my duty to carry them to the committing magistrate, Mr. Woollaston. This is the key. I saw it given to John Turner. Cox recalled—This is the letter. John Turner, bailiff to AL.. Frampton, the magistrate— I received a key from him, and on the 26th of February I went to the house of George Lovelace, and saw his wife. I applied that key to a box on the table. In the box we found two books. I carried them to Mr. Framp. ton. James Bryant was with me. These are the same books. Cross.examined by Mr. DERBISHIRE did not put any mark on them. I only know them by the writing and dirt on them. _ _ The books were then traced through the hands of dif ft rent parties. The following letter was then put in and read : "here Heath, Feb. 1, 1834. " Brother,—We meet this evening for the purpose of form. ing our committee. There was 16 present, of whom 10 was chosen—namely, a president, vice-president, secretary, trea surer, warden, conductor, three outside guardians, and one in. side guardian. All seemed united in heart, and expressed his approval of the meeting. Father and Hallet wished very much to join us, but wish it not to be known. I advised them to come Tuesday evening at six o'clock, and I would send for you to come at that time, if possible, and enter them, that they may be gone before the company come. I received a note this morning which gave me great encouragement, and I am led to acknowledge the force of union." (Signed by the secretary.) Tie following rules were then put in and read : " GENERAL LAWS. " 1. That this society be called the Friendly Society of Agri_ cultural Labourers. " 2. That there be appointed a general or grand committee of management, not less than seven, and to that body shall be con. fided the affairs of the whole order, and nothing shall be legal or binding which does not proceed from them, or receive their sanction. One of the committee to be appointed corresponding secretary ; one half of the committee to be elected every three months. " 3. That the grand lodge shall be held at Toll Puddle. " 4. That there shall be a lodge appointed in every parish, and a local committee, in order to insure regularity in the pay ment of allowances to families who may be standing out, and to prevent any kind of disappointment, to act under the general committee. " 5. That at their grand lodge all remittances shall be made of all making money and contributions, after deducting the necessary expenses of each lodge. And a return of the names of the members from all lodges in the different parishes once a-quarter, on the first lodge.night in January, April, July, and October, and in case of emergency the managing committee shall have the power to require the remittance to be made monthly, weekly, or as they think proper or necessary. " 6. That the contributions be fixed at Id. per week, but, in case of any emergency, the committee shall have the power to raise them to any amount they may think necessary to meet the emergency of the case. " 7. That the contributions be paid up and the books cleared armee a.month, and any member neglecting to do so shall be subject to a fine of 3d. " 6. That if any member neglects to pay up his contribution, and so incur the tine according to the last law, and shall fur ther neglect to clear off the book on his following lodge night, then before the lodge closes the secretary shall inquire whether such person or member be in the lodge, and if not, whether any person present will pay for him, and if none answers for him, the secretary shall give notice of the same to the committee, that they may take such steps as they may think proper. " 9. That no member shall be required to pay contributions during the time he may be sick or out of employ. " 10. That every person on his initiation into this order shall pay Is. as entrance-money. " 11. That in all lodges there shall be a president, vice pre. sident, secretary, treasurer, conductor, warden, outside and inside guardian. " 12. That the officers of all lodges be elected at the end of every quarter, and take their respective offices on the nett lodge.night after the election. " 13. The general or grand committee of management shall be elected from 5 of the local committee—viz., 3 at the place of the grand lodge, the president, vice-president, and secretary, and I from each of the 4 parishes nearest to the grand lodge. " 14. That all lodges be opened once a fortnight for the transaction of business. " 15. That there shall be one pass-word into all the lodges after this order, to be changed once a quarter, and to proceed from the grand lodge. " 16. That no obscenity shall be tolerated in either songs or toasts, and that no political or religious subjects be introduced during lodge hours. " 17. That these rules be read in all lodges every lodge night, at such time as the president shall think fit. " 18. That if any lodge be guilty of any irregularity or transgression of the general laws, or any declination of duty, the grand 19dge shall have the power to dissolve the same, or to inflict such penalty as shall appear to it sufficient to satisfy the justice. " 19. That no place shall turn out for an advance of wages without the consent of this grand lodge. "20. That if any master attempts to reduce the wages of his workmen, if they are members of this order they shall in. stantly communicate the same to the corresponding secretary, in older that they may receive the support of the grand lodge ; and in the meantime they shall use their utmost endeavours to finish the work they may have in hand, if any, and shall assist each other, so that they may all leave the place together, and with as much promptitude as possible. " 21. That if any member of this society renders himself obnoxious to his employer solely on account of his taking an active part in the affairs of this order, and is guilty of no viola tion or insult to his master, and shall be discharged from his employment solely in consequence thereof, either before or after the turn-out—then the whole body of men at that place shall instantly leave that place, and no member of this society shall be allowed to take work at that place until such member be reinstated in his situation. " 22. That if any member of this order shall divulge any of the secrets or violate the obligations of the same, his name and a description of his person and crime shall immediately be core. municated to all lodges throughout the county, and if any such person gets work at any place where a lodge is established, or where men belonging to this order are working, they shall de cline to work with such an individual, shall instantly leave the place, and shall receive the support of the grand lodge, as if they were turned out against the reduction of wages. " 211. That the object of this society can never be promoted by any act or acts of violence, but, on the contrary, all such proceedings must tend to injure the cause and destroy the society itself. This order, therefore, will not countenance any violation of the laws. "24. That any by-laws which any lodge may make for its i own internal government, sh a ll no t s et as ide, or in any way in_ validate, these general laws of this order. " BY-LAWS. " L That this lodge shall be opened from the `'lst of March to the 21st of September, at half.past 8 o'clock, and from the 21st of September to the 21st of March, 7 o'clock, all officers to attend, find a substitute, or be fined 3d. " '2. That previous to the opening of the lodge the warden shall go round and ascertain if any improper " 3. That the outside and inside guardian shall adm it no member without the pass-word, nor any member who may be intoxicated. perso n be present. • 4. That as soon as a member enters the lodge he must give the inward sign, and attend the secretary, if he intends to Pay that night. " 5. That if any member disobey the president after being twice called to order, he shall be rejected from the lodg e that night. " 6. That no member be allowed to smoke, go in or out of the lodge, during the making a member. " 7. That no member be allowed to eat, read, sleep, swear, bet wagers, or use any obscene language during lodge hours. " 8. That if any member divulge thc name of any brother who votes for or against any candidate for any office in the lodge, he shall be fined the sum of (id. "9. That the word 'brother' shall be used only during lodge hours. 4, 10 . That committee to consist of five persons, to be chosen at the end of every quarter, which, together with the secretary, president, and treasurer of the lodge, shall inspect the books and add up the accounts, and make a report of the state of the funds on the following lodge night. " 11. That a box of three keys shall be kept, wherein shall be deposited the cash, books, regalia, &c., of the lodge. The keys to be kept by the president, vice-president, and warden. " 1 That when any member has to make any observations at the lodge he shall be upstanding, and address first the presi dent, and then brethren all, and no other brother shall be al lowed to speak until he has finished his observations." An account-I,ook was then put in, containing the names of the prisoners as having paid their sub+criptions. This closed the case for the prosecution. Mr. BUTT contended, on behalf of the prisoners John Stanfield, James Hatnmet, and James Brine, whom he det nded, that the facts adduced on the part of the prose cution were not sufficient to warrant his Lordship's send ing the ease to the jury.. Mr. Damns:mai, on behalf of George and James Love lace and Thomas Stanfield, submitted that there was not sufficient evidence-to send the case to the jury. To saris y the act of Parliament it was necessary that two things should be proved before this indictment could be sustained. First, it must be proved dirt the pri-oners at the bar had entered into an illegal association ; and se condly, that in pursuance of the object' of such aseocia tion they bad administered, taken, or assisted at, or con sented to, the administering of an oath binding the party, taking it to conceal the unlawful acts of the association. There was no evidence on his Lordship's notes to sustain the affirmative of these two propositions, or of either of them. Mr. Baron WILLIAMS then summed up the case to the jury, who in about 20 minutes returned a verdict of Guilty, and stated that the prisoners, at the time of ad ministering the oath in question, were themselves mem hers of a society, and had themselves taken an oath not to disclose anything connected with that society at the time they administered the oath. The sentence is not yet pronounced. Minot 19. (CROWN COURT.— Before Mr. Baron Ward.% us.) James Loveless and the five other prisoners who were on Monday found guilty of administering unlawful oaths were brought up this day to receive sentence, when Mr. Baron WILLIAMS, addressing them, said that, hav ing considered the objections made by their Counsel to the indictment, he came to the conclusion that they were not well founded. It was stated by some of them during the trial that they meant no harm to any person; but as it was difficult to dive into motives, people must be judged by their acts ; and the safety of the public required that a penal example should be made in this case. Whatever might be the motives of men when their conduct was withdrawn from public notice, their motives were likely to become worse. Having duly considered the nature of the offence, he felt bound, for the public safety, to pass the severest sentence which the law allowed, which was, that each of them be transported for seven years. NORFOLK CIRCUIT ---Bthir Sr. EarefuNDs, MARCH 19. (Before the LORD CHIEF JUSTICE.) John Norman, an aged and wretched looking labourer, was capitally indicted fur feloniously setting fire to the wheat stack of John Taylor, a farmer in this county. When apprehendrd he nei , her denied nor admitted the charge, but sullenly observed, " A man might as well be banged or shot as starved to death." After an impartial summing up by the learned CHIEF JUSTICE, the jury retired for about half an hour, and re turned into court with a verdict of Not Guilty. NORTIIERN CIRCUIT.....LANCASTER, 1114licir 18. (Before Mr. Justice TAUNTON.) William Taylor, aged 26, a man of colour, was in dicted fur the wilful murder of Mary Ann Benson, at Liverpool, on the 25th of December last. The occurrence took place in a house of ill fame in Huvvard's-court, Atherton-street, Liverpool. The deceased was a prostitute, and the two principal witnesses called for the prosecution were of the saute character. i%iary Tierney, the first witness, said—l live in Howard's -court, Atherton-street, Liverpool. In Decem ber last Mary Ann Benson, the deceased, and Ann Cole man, also livid there. On the morning of Christmas day, about two or three o'clock, the prisoner came to the house. I was in the kitchen by myself. lie drew a chair and sat down by the fire. He then laid hold of me and pulled me on his knee. I told Lim to leave loose. About five minutes after the deceased, Mary Ann Benson, came in, and after some conversation, she asked the prisoner to go up stair,. He said be had no money. She then asked for a candle, took the hat off the prisoner's head, and went to the bottom of the stairs. The prisoner insisted on having his hat. Ann Coleman went to open the door The "prisoner got his hat, but did not seem willing to go out. The deceased got hold of him by the collar of the coat, and said " You d rty fellow, walk out of this house." He then walked to the door very quietly, and wood on the bottom step. The deceased stood on the top one. The prisoner carve out with very bad language, and in about a minute after, I perceived him lift his right hand, and I saki to the deceased—" Mary Ann, come in." Just at that moment she fell on her back into thekitchen. I saw the prisoner lilt his right band, but did not see him strike. lle then ran down the entry. I cannot say whether be was sober sir not. The deceased was sober. Cross-examined by Mr. HENDERSON-There are three houses in Howard's-court. I kept the house this happened in, but I left it immediately after the deceased was interred. The other two houses were of the same description, and sailors came to them at all hours. An officer of the dock police proved having taken the prisoner into custody, and at the time he had two knives on him, which were produced. The Jury found the prisoner Guilty of Manslaughter. The Learned JUDgE then addressed the prisoner at some length, and said that he considered the off,nee de servt d the severest punishment he could inflict ; and the sentence of the Cuurt was that the prisoner should be transported for life. William Kelsey was indicted for the wilful murder of Sarah Davies, at Manchester, on the 17th December last, by setting her on fire. Jane Butterworth examined—l live at 10, Gregson street, Manchester. On the 17th December I was out for some coals about half-past six o'clock in the evening, and on my return I found the deceas. d, Sarah Davies, standing against my cellar rails, and the prisoner was with her; the deceased s.id, " How do you do?" but I didn't recollect her. She then asked permission to go down with the prisoner into the cellar, which, to my sorrow, I allowed them to do. The deceased proposed to pri soner to get some drink. The prisoner gave me a shilling, and 1 went and bought some gin. I also got sixpennyworth of tea and sugar for them. The iteceased was petfectly sober, but the prisoner was in liquor. They had gin and tea a second time, and after that the deceased became violently sick, and, while she was in the act of vomiting, the prisoner thrust the lighted end of the candle down her throat. I spoke to hint about doing such a thing in my house, when he laughed and said it was a _lake. I turned to the cupb.•ard, dnd the prisoner again did the same thing with the candle, when I swore if he didn't behave himself I would put him ou; of doors. The prisoner said be meant no harm; when I told he meant no good I was sure, and took the candle from him, and placed it in the fire-place. I left the prisoner and the deceased sitting on each side of the table, before the file. I was only gone three or four minutes, and on returning I found my cellar on fire. The pri-oner was on the top of the s•eps, and he said to me, " Mistress, your place is oa fire." I said, " Then you've set it on fire." He made no reply. I led him down the steps, and he said, " It's a rare bl.aa! Fire, fire! there'll be some bonny tinder !" I saw the deceased " flattering" in the bed. Her clothes were on fire, and she was moaning. I threw the beer I had over her. I also threw a pitcher of water over the flames. While I was doing this, I saw the prisoner going away, and I flew atter him, and took hold of him, and cried out, " Fire ! murder !" A watchman named Gee came up. They then carried they deceased out, and as she passed the pri soner the deceased said, " Stick to him; it's him that's done it." I said to him, " Oh, you villain, look at your actions." He made no reply, and I gave him in charge to the watchman. The prisoner, in his defence, said he had no recollection of anything that happened. The Jury found the prisoner Guilty of Min•laughter. His LORDSHIP addressed the prisoner, and said that taking all the circumstances into consideration, and the imprisonment he had u!ready suffered, the sentence was that he should be further imprisoned fur three months. .Richard _Lancaster was indicted under Lord Ellenbo rough's Act, with having unlawfully and maliciously as sault, d and wounded John Yates, at Whittle-le-Woods, with intent t' murder him, or do him some grievous bodily harm, on the 9th of November last. The Jury found the prisoner Guilty upon the third count of the indictment, of intending to do the prosecutor come grievous bodi y harm. Mr. Justice TAUNTON sentenced the prisoner to be transported for life. OXFORD CIR Ctl I T—SHREwsBuAr, Illaßcir 19. (Before Mr. Justice PATTESON.) A LOVING LIBEL.—LONE V. LEWIS. fora 31 Mr. libel.Seea rgnt T n a The plaintiffALFo nx had a ( l i c d t a rr l i i e a d t t o h n i s wad fort an h irty a y c e tio ar r s i the business of a mercer at Whitchurch. fle had brought up a (tinily of three children with credit and respectability, and had lived much in the bosom of his own family; but in the course of the last year he bad received considerable annoyance from young men in the same trade as himself. The defendant was the son of an opulent firmer, and was the shopman'at the shop of Messrs. Mode and Roscoe, which was nearly opposite, and it would be shown that a stone was thrown at the drawing-room window of the plaintiff, by a young man named Atchetly, from the bed room window of the defendant, and that on the next day the eldest daughter of the plaintiff received a letter from the defendant purporting to he a tender of affection. As the young lady had never exchanged a word with the de fendant slie returned the letter in a blank cover, through the medium of the post; and after this the same young lady received another letter, which, though it professed to be also a tender of affection, was really intended to be an in sult to the father. This letter was the subject of the pre sent action. Miss Mary Anne L a very beautiful gill, of about 19, was called ; she said—l am the daughter of the plain tiff, who ii a mercer. I received a letter from the defen dant. I had never spoken to him in my life, nor have I ever exchanged a look with him in my life. I received another letter from him before this one,which I sent back. I encased it in half a sheet of paper and returned it by post. The night before I received the first letter some thing occurred. Mr. C. PHILLIPS objected to this evidence, and The Learned JUDGE held that it was not admissible. Examination resumed—l remember an expression in the first letter, that if I would allow the defendant to write another letter, he would tell- me something I was not aware of. I read the second letter—my sister Emma was with me, and I read it to her ; but I mentioned it to my father before I opened it, by reason of the expressions in the former one; and I showed it to my fither, who took possession of it. My father has lived at Wtiitchurch as long as I can remember. Cross-examined by Mr. C. PHILLIPS—I have been in the habit of going to church, but I do not know that the defendant is. I may have seen him before this time. He has passed by the door. He had lived in Whitchurch two or three months before be sent this letter. I have seen him, hut not to exchange looks with him. Seeing hint go past, my father once said, " That is Mr. Moile's young man," and I have looktd at him. When he passed by I did not use to turn nsy head another way. I do not know whether or not he is a nice young man. The letter was read. It was to the following effect :-- " Whitchurch, Oct. 16, 1833. _ _ " Dearest Mary Anne,—l take the liberty of writing to you. When I came to the letter, which I supposed came from you, and found those lines returned which I sent, I as_ sure you that it was not at all congenial to my feelings. May I be allowed to ask why you rejected them ? Was it because you never saw me, or was it because you did not think me your equal ? If so, I think myself quite as respectable as you are ; and, as to my friends, I think them by far more respectable than yours. I would not, for my life, wish to hurt your feel ings, but I will tell you that there has not one day gone over my head, since I have been in Whitchurch, but what I have heard some one running your father down, and I have myself heard several travellers say that there is not a commercial room within 50 miles of this place, but that he is called any thing but an honest man or a tradesman. However, dearest Mary Anne, these things belonging to your parents, you can not help—those imperfections would all of them be over looked by me if you would but write and say that you have some little regard for me. How hard it was to me when I opened your letter, and found not even one word of reconcilia tion, and what I had sent previously returned. I thought that I should almost have sunk into the earth, I was so much affected. All my affections I have placed on you, and I can not take them away. Ido not think it any disgrace to me to stand behind a draper's counter. Ponder these words in your heart, and meditate upon them. Any time when I want a few thousand pounds it is ready for me. I now beg of you to write back, and if you reject these words, state the reason why you do so. I ask you, in the name of Him who knows the secrets of your and my heart, to give me your heart. If you will, I am sure that if we ask of him for his goodness, he will give it unto us, and crown us with his blessings; and after we have done and suffered his will here on earth, may be taken into his heavenly mansion, where we shall never marry, or be given in marriage.—l remain, yours affectionately, "THOMAS LEWIS." Mr. C. PHILLIPS, for the defendant, said that this foolish young man, who was only 20 years of age, never intended to cast any imputation on the plaintiff; but it did seem that the defendant was exceedingly useful to his em ployers, Messrs. Moile and Roscoe, the plaintiff being also in the same trade ; and it was, no doubt, the object of.the plaintiff to get rid of the useful shopman of the rival tradesman. V. relict for the plaintiff—Damages, 10/. POLICE INTELLIGENCE, MARLBOROUGH-STREET. FORGERY.-Oa Wednesday evening a person of the name of Prescott was brought before Mr. DYER, charged with having committed a forgery. It appeared from the evidence of Bollard, the officer, that on the 3d of January a warrant was granted to ap prehend the prisoner on a charge of fraud, but from that period until Wednesday afternoon he heard ❑othing of the prisoner. About three o'clock on the above named day Ballad was passing along Tichborne-street, when he met the prisoner. He then stated that he had a warrant for his apprehension, which had been granted on the applica tion of a ;:entletnan of the name of Wainwright. The prisoner offered to pay the money, but this was declined. The prisoner, it appears, wrote over to a Captain Camp bell, who was stationed in Ireland, requeging, in the name of Wainwright, the loan of 501. Just before the arrival of the lever Captain Ca!,:ptiell was thrown from his horse, and the injuries which he received caused his death. Captain Gordon, belonging to the same regiment, opened the letter, and thinking it written by Captain Wainwright, sent over orders to Messrs. Cox and Green wood to so 1 out 50/. worth of stock and to pay it over to Captain Wainwright. The prisoner called at Cox and Greenwood's, and received a check, signing a receipt in the name of Charles Wainwright. The difference in the Christian name, that of Captain Wainwright being Henry Maxwell, led to the discovery of the forgery. Tue prisoner, by the direction of Mr. DYER, was then searched, when 2801. in bank notes were found in his posse.sion. The prisoner, in reply to some questions, had no means of living, and was obliged to do as he had done. He had only left Dover on the Wednesday.—Remanded. HATTON_GARDEN. NOSE TWlSTlNG.—Yesterday John Appleton, bailiff to Mr. Layton of Holloway Grove, was charged with having assaulted William Acorn. The prosecutor, who has a very long nose, said that on Tuesday last he caught the defend ant throwing stones at some fowls belonging to Captain Evans, which had got into a meadow belonging to Mr. Layton. Witness s►id to him, "By what authority do you do so ?" on which the defendant seized hold of his nose, gave it a pull and a twist, and coolly said, " That's my authority." The twinge was so violent, that his olfac tory nerves had been out of order ever since.-1 he defence was, that Capt. Evans's fowls dirtied the grass so that the cattle would not touch it. When the defendant was driving them away, the complainant and other persons threw bricks at him. The complainant then asked him by what autho rity he chased the fowls, upon which he made bold to pull his nose.—The defendant was ordered to put in his own recogniztnces to answer the charge at the sessions. MARY LEB ONE. OMNIBUS RAClNG.—Yesterday William Harris and Richard Fell, the former driver of the Emperor, and the latter driver of the Favourite, both Paddington Omni buses, appeared to answer to summonses obtained against them by Mr. Wiliam Simpson, Surgeon, of Hammer smith. Complainant, on the afternoon of Tuesday was pro ceeding on horseback down Oxford-street, towards the city, when on arriving nearly opposite the Pantheon he saw the Emperor omnibus coming full gallop up the street, and before he bad time to get out of the way his horse was knocked down by the pole of the coach, and he himself was thrown off, his head coining in contict with the curb stone with such violence as to deprive him of his senses. Mr. STRUTT—Was there any other omnibus near ? Complainant—Yes ; the Favourite. They appeared to me to be racing against each other. A gentleman named Polber, who witnessed the accident, deposed that both omnibuses were racing. Harris, who said that what bad happened was quite by accident, was ordered to give the complainant M. as coin-. pensation for the injuries he had received, and to pay a fine of 40s. to the King; and Fell, who denied that his horses were galloping, was fined 40s. for furiously driving. QUEEN- S QU ARE. A New DANDO Term—Yesterday William Sigley: of Holywell-street, Horseferry-road, Westminster, wa brought befor. Mr. BURRELL on the following nov, charge : business) unesl Frederick ; o: i e he l ak o d e s k tbr i ee n ee nt the Ta arrested morn. t( e(h)n landlordb t a b d e go previous on fe tout uet ute B o d r n a i y t a ' s n: ing, the prisoner went into the house of Mr. William Far, ll fields, and told Mrs. Far, the landlady, that her husband and taken to the Marshalsea Prison, and that he wished her to come to him immediately. He then went away, and returned in about an hour, when he expressed his great surprise that sh e h a d not gone to see h er h us b an d, as it was of the greatest consequence that Mr. F.r should see her as soon as possible. Mrs. Far was greatly agitated at the intelligence; she did not know how to act as she had only two children, the eldest not more than 13 years of age, that she could leave in the bar to mind the busi ness; she, however, at last resolved to go. The prisoner went away, but in a short time returned after Mrs. Far had gone and told the children that he must take an inventory of everything in the house as an execution was put in, and he must take possession of everything. He then began writing, at the same time demanding something to drink, which the children served him with. He gulped down glass after glass, until the eldest child (who began to be frightened at his manner from the quantiy of liquor he drank) called in Mr. Burgess, a neighbour, who demanded to see the warrant of distress. The prisoner pulled out a printed piper, which he said was the warrant, but re fused to let him read it. He still continued in possession of the house, and got so intoxicated at free cost, that when Mr. Far returned home lie found him so drunk that he could not stand. His surprise may be easily imagine when he was informed of the matchless iMpudence of the prisoner in inventing such a lie. Mrs. Far soon after le turned, having made every inquiry, not only at the up 600 f lV h..mou l urte a i‘tur r ier s cie(l h .y:o a .ucpg i ßl s odo e u: a Prison, egaoiun t no The prisoner, charge, hut admitted chit he had drank the liquor. hi , (IR uac e Et r ; ro, i r n datfr r tee e ( p r ;: c., , ianui d t e ti n oo i n e pi d nagy the t:i g fie r a, e ep t ro te if. r m p ; 6 l :i o n f ir l: s he W / t .tunkenness, which being unablelo p a y locked up, hbutidiinapetvs.nof n umber hr houfeblaocnt THE MARKETS• a COI I N , ''' GENERAL AVERAGE PRICE OF 13.• For the'Week ended March 14, 1834, made :p i n' T 0 1,11 . h _ e: En Fle g t ralli -; of the Inspectors in the different Cities and Towns in ~,• Stt• . and Wales, pet I mperial Quarter. 31s. 1 Wheat--.. 475. &L Oats ..........-. 17e. 1 Id.l 8ean5.....-••• .., 1 „. Bd. 4 , Barley —.....273. Od `Rye 313. 3d.1Pea5e.......... , „ J o. r : s Pagco" tit i 4 I UPERIAL AGGREGATE AVERAGES OF THE SIX WEEK Wheat..„-...... 483. " 5d.1 Oats .««.- 183. Id./ 8ean5......• 2., Rl. B i ar1ey.........- 275. Od.l Itya 323. ld. lPease.....*-•' . . DUTIES ON FOREIGN CORN- v s . gal. Wheat,-........ 38s. Bd.l Oats ..•»•.•• 19s. `9d. cans ~.. 9j, 1. Barley -..-...215. 4d.1 Rye 2.15. 3d.1Pea5e,....., i.. ING COUN T „ 13 1 t a K r I el Wheat. a Bto s. s• to 18 Per Quarter. Ito s. 5.•20 -" tei Blandford !s. 5 3 25 00 30 ti' Blandford 40 58 36 15 ‘'• 40 - 16 .- Cambridge 4 7 25 On 22 ,A Chard 48 — 22 24 1 6 Huntingdon g 34 23 28 14 Fi 2 26 ys Long Sutton...—. 56 64 22 17 ` 40 "( Louth 48 54 32 18 22 3, 28 on •32 50 60 22 2,5 16 ~ , x , Newark -----•-•••••• 57 60 24 40 16 7 Nottingham ' 33 is 24 2 • - .... 47 52 26 21 •3 Peterborough ....... 39 48 25 29 13 23 Plymouth 50 64 30 34 20 A l 43 -- - 14 ` 22 LEEDS CORN MA Sleafonl 65 70 36 38 22 2 8 41 99 Uopinghain 42 47 0 8 32 22 26 L 6 56 Wisbech--........ 48 62 20 Oats. Wheat, N9rfolk and Suffblk, 601 b. • 40,, to York. and Lincoln. 6olb. _ di 405. v. —March 18. 4Rs. 5. toj 30 go 511 , ig 32 4 9 40 94 si 32 a o 37 :32 9 5 23 4 5 41 36 00 30 LEEDS COEN A Wheat, Norfolk and Sunlk, ---- York. and Lincoln. Barley, Norfolk and Suftbllc . - Yorkshire and Lincoli Grinding •iiiii - jr -1 18. , 1 40s. tO 0 1 .•_ ,... 35i. to 0. 13 .,...! 28s to 4 u'' Ishire • 31a. 0 2s to 9 3° ' lb. 18s. to 0_,,01. Eng. 9d. to 10)4ii.1'", 0 0. `.2•2.5. to 25a. Per Wt isbi Foreign, —l. to —l. Per Beans — 631 Oats, Potatoe —bleating, For. 12d. to 13d. Shelling Rapeseed, English, 254 to 27, LI VERPOOL CORN EXCHANGE.—March 18 . ‘2 ..0 1 . WHEAT, English, White, per 701 b. - 4 ---- Red --. Scotch, Welch, and Manx Irish, White 6 6 6 ---- Red 5 4 8 0 Foreign OATS, English, Welsh, and Scotch, per 451 b 2 2 Irish English, Irish, 8 Foreign 0 0 , 0 BARLEY, English, Malting, per Imp. quarter "a,... 2 l' 9 5 ' I Scotch and Irish, per 601bs. . Feeding 3 41 o BEANS, English, per Imperial quarter 34 1 34 0 28 0 38 —.PEASE,36 0 0. 46 Foreign 42 0 42 .., c ;)er Imperial quarter ._ 0 - Foreign Fiona, English, per 2801 b. - - 6 Irish ............. .. . . .. 3 . 4. (0) 44 a OATMEAL, English and Irish , .... p.e.1::?"101bs ........ : 4 1' 0 ; . INDIAN CORN, per 4401 b. BYE, per Imperial quarter .......................... 4 6 0 '2 MALT, per Imperial quarter ...... March . _so. IMPORT OF GRAIN for the Week ending loal." Wheat.! Oats. I Barley Flour. kg . LOad: Qrs. Qrs. Qrs. Foreign, Brls.llrish,Ba2c--- 3,C.' 6,1i - 3 13,030 , 550 1,099 I 8,8: 1 .' --- rat el e a bi In this day's market, which exhibited a nwde tten 0 SOUTHALL MARKET.—March 19 ' IWO supply throughout, and was rather numerou aYfaand gat°, buyers, but, with the exception of the prirnest Be! . ~,e w as ye . ' , ?, having met with some little degree of briskness , Tril e o f ,i, to 3 2 4 ._.O d ß u e l e l f ,._at the following follo O w s i . l o ig t. p t r o ic 4 es s. i od ier . 5 t t v 0n e e m 0 „............* 18 11) . , T . ` 6 ,1. to ss•i - Mutton -........ 4 0 5 0 1 1'0rk.......-^' - ' stone lower ttAl's, The foregoing quotations are Veal 2d. ,pe.r. o . an d pork,' A on this day se'nnight; prices of Beet . ._ ll L e T a ; Pigs, 64 ' small portion of the supply tionary. Beasts, 181 ; Sheep, 2 208; ' '- lot the market uosold. ,Maw . small portion supply left inar''.-..• I, t 9 J. RUMFORD MARKET.--matc- --• c d. s; 0 s. cos .4 0 ' ', Beef 3 0 4 0 Veal .................. 3 4 4 Mutton 3lO 410 Pork •.. ............... 12 to le 4 • Suckling Calves, I4s. to 30s. ; Quarter old Store Pigs, - 4 . , Mitch Cows, with their small Calf, 91. 10s. to IV. Supply moderate, and trade dull. HAILSHAM MARK E 1' --March, 19., i . O 6 0(1. Beef-................., 3s 6d. to 3s. 10d. I Vea1........•••• • 4•'' B'4 0 . Mutton-,.....,....: 5. 0 5 6 I Pork .....-•-•-•,-- otShueig•liYserather limited; tirade with prime ',lea" dull. 3 meat brisk, p°l 04' ARUNDEL MARKET —MOO 1,.....• .4 8 d. to 5 4 5. 0 8eef.,.............. 3s. 2d. to 4s. Od. Vea1...........-...." . Mutton ...,........ 4 2 50 • P0rk..........,........ Sd. 3 •• Lamb ..,M ~,...M 6s Od. to 6 . , I Supply moderate, and trade dull 1 CHICHESTER 51ARKET.-March 19. 65. 04 t,' 8eef.,................. 3s Od s. d. to 0 Mutton 4 • 0 . to 48. Oct I Vea1,..... ; 6 4 . 5 0 I Pork ................:, 0: ~-,:: ---- Lamb 55 10d. to 6s. bo. o clt ' ~ mi Supplyof fat Beasts moderately g od of fat small st ted ; trade rather dull. In lean suck little doing. -----.11.—.-....• YORKSHIRE lilitirlall' (From the Halifax EsP"e irl l' HALIFAX.—The demand for both go°" flat atthis and wool w as 3 market last Saturday, and little or no alteration to°' ratM f place in prices. As regards wool, however, there was , more done in good war hogs • but the sales of ate,we though more numerous than they were on the preeediag:d were very limited in extent, as few buyers would porch more than they were wanting immediately n i n th a t HUDDERSFIELD.—There was no Material alteratio ~ of (10E60,10 i state of this market last Tuesday, the superfine . broad cloths and fancy goods being most in demand. ._ t o B RA DFORD.—The stuff trade still continues flat . 1: 1 0 ,0 e , , the whole, any more business done than there WaS . Thursday preceding. the a n •ce 'i , VO S LEEDS.—In both the cloth halls on Tuesday last p - o of business was very limited, in consequence of the high A • of the raw material. au% aP i i i ROCHDALE.—This market, on Monday, we r eWaolrereci- i j . there were scarcely any buyers, although good s ' remarkably low prices. f ____._.._....---- ....- at A Roman Catholic Chapel is ereeiting (l' ' by WO upper end of the Rtgent's Park, near St. j°-- '' '' road, at the sole cost of two ladies. i 0 Crl * PP s? 1 A poo. Englishman of the na me , 1 ditd at Fermoy on Saturday, aged 105 y ear • , abOt l. At Antwerp, a few days ago, a Pi cebought hY/ a foot high, and a foot and a half w ide, was nor glazier of that town for 10 sous. O n the followint e p t, ket day lie sold it for seven francs a nd a half, a" a t Fsm ill ter purchaser having ascertained that it was a flulY s , 200 by Raphael, re-sold it to an am ateur at Doge, for f francs.— Galignani's Mess. NS ° M. GUIZOT AND 111$ VARIATIO . deli, 1. that, after the srec h e __ ls . OPINION.—The Temps says, vet ed by M. Guizat iti the Chamber of I eputies in . %' _,. nation of his change of opinions relative political mysticism uuey., and in which he • 1 11' terminate la to Assotatt.or• fantastical paraphrase of the r:flection of r ß :S e d 5 " L'homme s'agite et Dieu le niene," a raem be _,, the elder Dupin if he• recolected from what w i o i r i : to i r e Bossuet the quotation was made. From the " n pia. des variations des Protestans," replied 51. -- d . f the Colonel St. Clair's ‘, Recollections ° h / a .i, West Indies" are full of individual a dventur o e f i re b e l; f o:t o i ll i f , serious and a comic nature, and his manner i!s t just what one should expect of a soldier": er s t ir g p age i d et i l, n and manly. Tb: gallant writer, w hen 'I L ; r o r 1: en . his military duties, or in hunting the j a g o :,,:ioi• .i. snaring the alligator, looks about him with s' five eye on the state of society in the toses,., and his reader accordingly some p iquant sketches or *--, so w c ladies, not forgetting the creole and otherwis • dotes of these are not a little attractive. BIRTHS. A., 01 i 4 On the l9th inst., at the Priory, Oxford, of a . t g i, " , "? EdWard Gilbert, Esq of Magdalen Hall, Utley, Oxon, thdeal:_",.,,k On the 2d inst , at ' Rome a son and heir. . ' I the Right Hon. Lady Clin t ° ~, MA RIIIED • e, . °1 : On the 20th inst., at St. Mary's Church, Marylebo°l dautr Gadsden, Esq., of Furnival's Inn, 0 Martha, yourige' ter of the late John Field, Esq., of Oxford. street. d j ofor ds On the 17th inst., at Kento, Devonshir, Well° o ,fielli . only son of Mr. R. J. Allen, of Leman-street, G° cgiel : rdsq , to Lucy Welch, eldest daughter of William C fi ' • o's i lk the former place. Georg.. I It , By his Grace the Archbishop of York, at St• f the i tev• S)- nover-square, 1)r. Holland, to Saba, daughter e• 10 0 : ney Smith. , ton, •I' On the 20th inst., at St. Paul' s Church, 0" )lar y, Wid" ~ o. 0' S. Harvey, Esq., of Great St. Helen's, to L. S • ansoni, Esq., his Majesty's CollectorL;rtd the Island of Ceylon Cambria; Isle of IY e r uecc eld On the 19th inst., at Haddenham, shire, Mr. Henry Johnson,ville, t ° I of Penton Piaoint de Gallo, daughter of the late Robert Pate, Esq. .• age d .! DIED. l , „, dish-square', • CI On the 15th inst., in Holles.street, ' 3 " t : i t in Fig ° ' 13 months, George F ranc is Cosby, 00 o. Cal) 3 P IS the Royal Regiment of Horse Guards. of O s idOW On the 17th inst., in Hans-place, 111arY, W det , Mr. John Mills, of Park-lane. 13°9 On the 28th of ult., at Rome, Thomas Esq., late of the Middle Tem le and of ins, in Ita'ii,spelPg On the, 20th ' p ' S"reY' • I3oone Ta_tta.a_l.l .. f, inst., at Chobliam-place, fl ij j ' wife of Samuel Thornton, Esq., aged 75 ' it,,, ( 14 5, or f . On the 19th inst., in Upper Nt n street, aS e 114 , or o - . 4 the beth, widow of the late Licut. Michael Smith, y 86 t army. the t,, On the 15th inst., at Walworth, in his 7,ith Yo r ' W. Willey. a g O, 1; 4 4 i, PRINTLD AND PUBLISHED BY 'MU lino You - 1,: i , SUN OFFICE, 112, 5i51a.,39..! 4 .i.l' • . ' . : i l ' = , f .. i 5~ `'.