The Sun. — London, England, 1831-08-27 00:00:00

zonal . ) , alluded to by the Hon. Member for Dundalk, who said that he (Mr, O'Connell) had never expressed his com misseration of the victims of atrocities that were perpetrated in the South of Ireland. There could be no assertion more nnfounded.—(Hear.) The Hon. Member had never heard him mention those atrocities without expressing the utmost grief and abhorrence.—(Hear, hear.) As to what had been said by a Noble Lord, with respect to the body of gentlemen who waited on the Prime Minister, and of whom he (Mr. O'Connell) ha I the honour to be one, lie attached but little importance to it. Indeed, there could not be found anywhere a more ignorant body than the Irish aristocracy; but, above all things, they were espe cially ignorant of all that concerned Ireland. Even when they resided there, they saw nothing of the people, and learned nothing of their want or i nterests ; deriving all their information from parasites and flatterers. Looking to the constitution of an hereditary Legislature, it was not wonderful that half-maniacs should be found in it. The lion. Member fur Dundalk would not admit that any of the Orangemen were exotics in Ireland. But he would ask the Hon. Gentleman himself, was he not one? and how did be contrive to win the sweet voices of the Orangemen of Dundalk, when he wooed them in a dialect which they could scarcely understand.—(Laughter.) How did it happen that from being nothing in Scotland, he became a Legislator for Ireland.—(Laughter.) Huge and sweeping assertions had been made by the Hon. Member for Dun dalk, and the House would judge how far assertions coining from such a quarter were entitled to credit, when he re minded them of what took place between him and that lion. Member respecting a letter of the Rev. Mr. Murphy, of the county of Clare. The Hon. Member for Dundalk, on the occasion to which he alluded, produced what pur ported to be a letter from that Rev. Gentleman. He (Mr. O'Connell) detected in it a Scoticism, and also perceived that it was not in the hand-writing of Mr. Murphy. The Hon. Member for Dundalk, however, read it as the letter of Mr. Murphy, but when more particularly questioned on the point, said that it was only a copy, but that he would produce the original, and undertook to do so, it being in his possession. An Hon. Friend of his (Mr. O'Connell), now on the other side of the House, asked for permission to inspect the original, and then received for answer, that he (the Member for Dundalk) had not the letter in his pos session, but that a friend of his then bad it, and that it should be produced on an early day. Months had passed away since then, and no letter was forthcoming. Was he not justified then in saying that no such letter was in ex isteece, and that the document read to them was only a fabrication ? He believed that the Hon. Member for Dun dalk could cot produce the supposed letter. He defied him to do so. The Hon. and Learned Gentleman then went on to notice what had fallen from the Right Hon. Member fur Warwick, describing part of it as a threat held out to deter his Majesty's Government from disbanding the yeo manry, seeming to tell them that they dared not do so, and suggesting that the Orangemen of the North might arm themselves at an expence of twenty-five shillings each, and thus, in effect, advising them to do so, affirming that the O: angemen could arid would arm themselves. It fortu nately happened, that there never was a Government in this country better able than o as the present to treat such a threat with utter contempt, and entire defiance. Let thesis only disarm the yeomanry, and he would undertake to say that the unarmed peasantry would support the Go nerntrent, and preserve the peace of the country. He thought that the present circumstances of Ireland justified his calling upon the Government to disarm the yeomanry. He thought that the blood which bad been shed at New tnwnbarry, at Monaghan, and at Castle-pollard, entitled him to mske that demand. Why not send over English Militia ? He was sure the expence would gladly be borne by Irelaud alone ; they had no desire to shake off good order, but they would nut endure the continued existence of a partisan force. What sort of force must that be, which, with arms in its hands, entered into village squabbles, every family dispute, and, worst of all, every modification of religious animosity? He did not call for any open cen sure to be pronounced upon the hotly, neither did he de mand that it should be immediately altered, but that by de grees an end should be put to the force which had for so long a period been disturbing, deranging, affrighting—he would not say murdering', but at least bloodletting—lreland. Captain GORDON said, that he pledged himself to the authenticity of the letter, on the authority of the individual who communicated to him the copy of the letter. He had since written to that individual, but he had recently come to England, and so soon as the letter could reach him here through Ireland, no doubt the original would be forwarded to London. There could be no doubt of its existence ; it had beets in the hands of several Members of the last Parliament. It had been published in the Ennis Paper, a .lotrmal published in the very county where Jr.l Murphy resided, and its authenticity never once questioned. Mr. WYSE, in reply to what had fallen from the Right Hon. Member for Harwich respecting the meeting of hlembers of that House, which lately bad a conference with one of his Majesty's Ministers, observed, that that Right Hon. Gentleman was himself a member of a similar body which waited upon Lord Liverpool, and it therefore ill became him to designate the late assemblage as a cabal. As to the threats of the Right Hon. Gentleman, he hoped that no Government would be so pusillanimous as to sub mit to the dictation of Prw'orian guards. Mr. PETRE wished that the authenticity of the letter were settled one way or the other. Though himself a conscientious Catholic, lie should deprecate such lan guage as that letter contained, come whence it might. Mr. M. O'CONNELL said the letter bore date at a time when Mr. Murphy was confined to bed by illness. The petition was then brought up and laid on the table. On the question that the orth r of the day be then read fur the House resolving itself into a Committee on the Reform in Parliament (England) Bill, Mr. SIBTHORPE rose to put a question to the Hon. Gentleman opposite, the Under Secretary for the Home Department. He wished to know whether it was true that the owners of the J?othsay Castle had the sanction of the Crown for calling that vessel a Government packet, and b 0 leading the public astray as to the character and safety of the vessel ? Mr. GEORGE LAMB said, that the matter should undergo the fullest investigation. It was a common prac tice for vessels to be called Government packets, without any other claim to that title than what might arise from being occasionally contracted with for the removal of troops. Mast of the people about the sea ports knew how those things stood, but it was to be regretted that persons not conversant with affairs of that nature might sometimes be misled. It was a subject that ought and would be at tended to. REFORM. The House then resolved itself into a Committee to con sider further the Reform in Parliament (England) Bill. The consideration of the 21st clause was renewed, and some verbal amendments proposed and agreed to. On that part of the clause which limited the e'ective franchise to persons actually themselves paying rates for the tenements out of which they voted, Mr. WASON complained that the Bill would have the effect of doing away with one of the best local Acts there was; namely, one applying to Liverpool, by which land lords were compelled to pay the rates. Lord ALTHORP admitted the difficulty, but observed that they were under a necessity of drawing a distinction between these who paid rates and those who did not, and the difficulty in this case could not have been avoided without incurring a greater. Mr. C. CALVERT and Mr. WiLxs both observed, that DO injustice would arise from persons not:paying rates being excluded ; for any one entitled to pay, and wishing to possess the franchise, might pay the rate in his own pro per person and prevent the landlord's doing so, The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, in order to prevent any misapprehension as to the construction of the clause, moved to insert the words " owners and tenants," so that no person occupying a tenement should have the right of voting unless he were a prayer of raters. Some discussion upon this amendment took place; in the course of which both Mr. Alderman WOOD and Mr. Alderman VENABLES objected to it, on the ground, that though the Livery of London did not object to the fran chise in the city being extended, yet the giving votes to every person who occupied a counting-house or floor in the city, certainly appeared so be extending the principle of the Bill much further than had as yet been at all hinted at. Sir C. Wetherell, Sir E. Sugden, and several other lion. Gentlemen also dissented to the amendment, on the ground that it was neither more nor less than giving lodgers votes, provided they took their lodgings in a par. ticular way ; when if it was really intended to give lodgers votes, it would be much fairer to introduce a clause for that express purpose at once. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, in answer to the ob jections, contended that the difference between being dis tinct occupants of a floor or chambers and mere lodgers in a house was very different ; the class of persons who oc espied the former were all persons who moved in a res pectable sphere ; while the latter varied from almost the very highest classes to the very lowest. Another distinc tion was, that the occupiers of the former either paid rates themselves, or a charge in their rent for that purpose was made by the landlord; so that the question of registration might, in this case, be easily managed ; while in the case of mere lodgers, they wou ld be utterly at lossa to know how to register them. With respect to the number of voters being considerably increased in London by this weans, he did not see how the Livery could . complain of the that, at they generally approved of the prineipk vt kye4i tf+n Pill ; and the main feature of that principle was the ex tensiqn of the suffrage, wherever it could be so done with a prospect of obtaining a respectable constituency. A very long and desultory conversation ensued, in which Lord Althorp, Mr. Alderman Wood, Mr. Hunt, Sir Ed ward Sugden, Sir Charles Wetherell, and Lord John Rus sell were the principal speakers, as to the legal meaning of this clause, and as to its effect on the city of London ; in the course of which Sir R. PEEL made the following observation :—Now that the Committee had agreed to a uniform qualification, I.e wondered that it had not occurred to the Noble Lord to introduce some simple and uniform test of that qualifi cation, such as that of the Jury Laws. If the qualifica tion for a common juror were adopted as the qualification of a voter, he was sure that would prevent much litiga tion, which undoubtedly would take place under this Bill if it ever became a law. The assessment to the poor-rates, such as was adopted in the Jury Law, would be at once a simple and uniform test. He would not say assessment to the house-duty, ly , cause that might imply the permanency of that tax ; but he would suggest, as they had adopted a uniform qualification, to decide that by the principle of un assessment to the poor-rates. At the same time, he roust say, that he was not an advocate for one uniform right of voting, and he said God forbid that it ever should become the law of the land as it was now proposed to be introduced. The discussion on the legal meaning of this clause was then again continued, till at length Mr. Serjeant WILDE, at the sound of a legal argu ment, requested to know what was the question before the Committee? If he understood rightly, it was the last proviso of the clause; and in discussing that, lion. Gen tlemen had discussed the whole of the clause. The CHAIRMAN read the question, and stated that it was whether certain words should be inserted in clause 21. Sir R. PEEL then said, that when the Committee was about to frame a new Constitution for the country, he must object to being tied down to the exact letter of the line of the clause under discussion. He was afraid that this clause had not been considered in relation to the existing laws ; and he must beg to inform the Learned Serjeant that he had probably overlooked one law to which he begged to call attention. By the 59th of Geo. 111., it was provided, though he was afraid that he must not read the preamble, as it cast reflections on the class now to return Mem bers to Parliament. The Ris,ht Hon. Baronet, however, read the preamble, which stated, " that whereas there were, p trticularly in large towns, houses let out to tenants and lodgers, who frequently changed their abodes and did not pay the poor rates, and that the owners of the houses obtained a large rent on account of the tenants so escaping the payment of rates, and therefore it was enacted that the owners of these houses should be liable to pay the rates for such houses." This was a general Act, and the law of the land, and under it authority was given to seize the goods and chattels of the occupiers of such apartments or tenements as were liable to the rates, and to distrain upon them for the rates due while they so occupied these tene ments ; and it provided, also, that if the occupier paid the rates, or bad his property distrained, he might deduct what he paid out of the rent for which he was liable. That was the general law of the land. The owners of the houses were liable to the rates, and in case the occupiers paid, they might deduct what they paid from the rent. He (lid not bring forward such a statement for any purpose of delay; but it was proper, in reference to the clause under discussion, to refer to this Act of Parliament. If the te nant made the deduction of the rates from a ten-pound rent, he would be disqualified for a voter. If be made the deduction of his rates be would not occupy a ten pound house. He would suppose a case where a house was rented at thirteen pounds, and the rates amounted to four pounds ; then if the tenant paid the rates, and deducted them from the landlord, his rent would only be nine pounds, and he would not be entitled to a vote. No no tice was taken of that in the Bill, and it was a manifest contradiction to the law. Some arrangement might be made between these conflicting enactments ; the discre pancy admitted, he believed, of a remedy, and he called at tention to it with a view 'to make the Bill as perfect as he could. He was sure that those who drew the Bill never could have adverted to the 59th of George 111. Mr. Serjeant NVILDE said that, as far as he had an opportunity of considering this case, the tenant in joint oceup:ncy would be entitled to recover nom the land lord, if he paid the rates beforehand for the purpose of voting. It frequently happened, however, that there were a number of small houses of different sizes, of which the landlord paid the rates of all in one sum, by composition. Now the only difficulty be felt was as to the ascertaining of the proportion of rates in such cases, so that the tenant might be able to recover his vote, for he was inclined to believe that in all cases the tenant could deduct the amount from the landlord, or recover it at law. After some conversation between Sir R. PEEL, Mr. Seijeant WILDS, and Mr. C. FERGUSSON, Sir E. SUGDEN said, the true statement of the case was really this :--The clause, as it at present stood, allowed the tenant to vote on paying his rates ; but at the same time (and the Noble Lord (Althorp) admitted it) the tenant, when he bad so paid, was not entitled to re• cover his vote from the landlord, or empowered to deduct it. He really thought that, after differences of opi nion expressed by all the gentlemen connected with the law, respecting the true bearing and effect of the clause, the Noble Lord should not press it, without having pre viously attempted to make it somewhat more intelligible. Mr. WILKS observed that the clause was undoubtedly not very clear ; but he thought it better it should pass, 'han the tenant be deprived of the chance of a vote. Sir C. WETHERELL said, that if the clause was per mitted to stand, they would be compelled to pass an Act to d. Clare that it was not intelligible. The Ministers were, however, deceiving the people with hopes that would not l i be realised. They proclaimed to the people of Manchester and Birmingham that they were giving them a great boon in the ten-pound qualification, but it would be found, whe❑ the Act came into operation, that it was so worded, few or none of that class of persons could take advantage of it. Under the clause, as it now stood, the tenant might gain a vote by paying his rates, but then lie could not recover from his landlord, so that be was driven to the necessity of losing his vote or his money.—(Hear, and a laugh.) The Government expressed a great respect for the rights of the operatives, and he (Sir C. Wetherell) admitted that they were a highly intelligent, respectable, and trust-worthy class of the community. But how did the Government treat that class, with all their popularity-hunting profes sions of regard to their interests ? Why they deceived and deluded tbeni with the prospect of advantages which they were not to enjoy. He (Sir C. Wetherell), although he did not profess so much, would deal more fairly with them. He would not say to them, " You ate to have a vote," and afterwards leave them to pay h pound in the shape of rates, which it appeared they had no power to recover. The opinion which a Learned Serjeant and eminent pleader gave on the stibj'et was, that the tenants might pay their rates, and he was inclined to believe (a style of language very common with the Learned Serjeant's profession, when they gave an opinion)—he was inclined to believe they alight afterwards recover by an action at law.—(Hear, and a laugh.) If the Government would but print this opinion at the end of clause 21, and send it down for dis tribution in Manchester, and Birmingham, and the manu facturing districts, he apprehended that the Ministerial ex citement in favour of the great popular• measure would not be quite so sparkling and animating as they had been led to believe.—(Hear, and a laugh.) After a few words from Mr. PRAM), on the contradic tory nature of the proposition, The clause, which was an addition to the original one, and gave a vote to all persons in joint occupation, provided that each person in that joint occupation paid a sum of ten pounds yearly, was read and agreed to. Mr. MACKINNON then moved, " That no person who receives rent from lodgers in any house, shall be qualified to vote for such house if the yearly rent be under twenty pounds." Lord ALTHORP opposed this amendment, and obe served, that if the objection was worth anything, it was equally applicable to houses of fifty pounds a year, if the landlords had lodgers. Mr. STUART WORTLEY said, that the best way of meeting the difficulty would be to enact that no person .hould possess a vote unless he paid a rent of ten pounds over and above the sum received from his lodgers. After a few word♦ from Lord ALTIIORP and Mr. HUNT, Mr. MACKINNON said, as the sense of the Committee was against him, he would ask leave to withdraw the clause.—Clause withdrawn accordingly. Mr. MACKINNON then moved, " That in all cities or boroughs which contain from 300 to 500 houses of 10/. rent, the qualification to vote may remain as stated in the section ; but in those which have from 500 to 1000 houses of 10/. rent, the qualification to vote shall be 15/. yearly rent; and in those which have 1,000 houses and upwards, the qualification to vote shall be 20/. rent." Lord ALTHORP said, that the subject had been fully discussed last night ; and as he had stated, not once or twice, but at least twenty times, the grounds on which he supported the clause in its present form, he would not again trespass upon the patience of the Committee. Mr. Twavon and Colonel Sitrrnoar a supported the amendment. The Hon. Member for Lincoln retnonstrated against the noise and inattention in the House, which, nOtWitbOttuding all the efforts of the Chairman (of the severity of whose task he was fully aware), prevented the sentiments of Hon. Members from being beard.' . Sir C. WETHERELL repeated his former arguments against the clause. The amendment was negatived without a division. • Mr. H. lIUGHES then rose to move his amendment, which, he said, in consequence of what had fallen from the Hon. and Learned Member for Stafford, he should vary from his notice. His object was to protect the poorer classes of tenantry, who, having for several years paid their rents regularly to their landlords, might nevertheless receive notices to quit on the eve of an election, for the purpose of depriving them of their franchises. His motion now was to add to the clause a proviso, " That notice to quit, given between the period of the dissolution of one Parliament and the electio❑ of a Member or Members to serve in the succeeding Parliament, for any city, town, or borough, to a weekly tenant, or a tenant liable to quit at a week's notice, shall not have the effect of depriving such tenant of his right of voting." He had thus altered his motion, because he had understood from the Hon. and Learned Gentleman, that to take from the landlord the right of giving notice to his tenant would be an improper interference between the landlord and tenant. _ _ Lord ALTHORP objected to the proposition, the effect of which would be to give persons a right of voting after they had lost possession of the tenement in virtue of which they were to vote. He admitted that there might be some inconvenience as the matter stood ; but, upon the whole, he thought that the inconveniences that would attend the adoption of the Hon. Gentleman's suggestion would greatly preponderate. Mr. H. HUGHES did not see any difficulty which by an alteration of the terms of the oath, or by other means, might not be obviated. Mr. CAMPBELL thought that on such points they must trust to the public opinion for the prevention of oppression. The amendment was negatived without a division. Mr. HUNT then rose to propose his amendment, and said he would trouble the Committee very shortly. His motion was, " That all persons who shall be excluded from voting for Members of Parliament shall be exempt from the payment of taxes and rates, and from serving in the militia, and be protected from being compelled to serve in the navy under the Impressment Law." He made this motion on die principle that taxation and representation should go hand in hand. Such a principle was in general conformity to the principles of our Constitution. If in a Court of Justice a person were tried for a crime, and he should plead ignorance of the law, he would be answered that he was bound to know it; it being presumed that he was instrumental in making the law, by his represents t:ve. Being quite aware of the :nanner i❑ which his mo tion would be received, he would nut press his motion to a division. Lord ALTHORP opposed the motion. The Hon. Mem ber for Preston did not push his motion far enough. It would go to exempt any naan who had not a rote for a Member of Parliament from obeying the law. The amendment was negatived without a division On the motion of Mr. PRAM), the following proviso was added to the clause ;—" That no person shall, by rea son of anything herein contained, acquire a vote in the election for any city or borough, who shall, within twelve calendar months next previous to the last day of November in the present year, or next previous to the last day of August in any succeeding year, have been in the receipt of parochial relief." Os the motion, " That the clause so amended stand part of the Bill," Mr. FANE (amidst great noise and confusion) argued that the clause was incompatible with our form of govern ment ; he doubted if the house had a right to establish such a system, and if it were established, he doubted their power to carry it into effect. Mr. S. WORTLEY protested against the great change which this clime was calculated to introduce into the re presentative system. The present clause embodied a more important change in the Constitution than perhaps any other in the Bill. It appeared to him very extraordinary, that those who had undertaken to provide a new represen tative system, should go one step beyond what was actu ally necessary to effect that object. When a considerable part of the representation had been abolished, and the elective franchise had been transferred elsewhere, it un doubtedly became necessary to provide some rule for the franchise. But to change the whole borough constituency, to take away all existing rights, and to substitute others in the manner in which they had been exhibited, was, in his opinion, most unjustifiable. He had never witnessed so striking an exhibition of rashness and recklessness. The most astonishing part of the affair was, that what had been done, had been done in the absence of all informa tion. What were the documents before the House? A few meagre returns of the last session respecting ten-pound qualifications, and some anonymous communications, were all on which Parliament had been called upon to pass this portentous measure.. The first description of papers de cidedly were placed on false foundations. For the sake of argument, he would admit that the last papers might be of high authority. But Government, at all events, was in this dilemma—either that tiey had pro ceeded upon information which they did not lay before the House, and thus insulted it in proposing the clause, or else they proceeded upon the information they had laid before the House, and which was not sufficient to justify Ministers, and much less the House, in coining to any conclusion upon the subject. The great object of this part of the Bill was to prevent corruption; but he contended that the 101. voters would be more liable to be bribed than the constituency as it existed at present. He would not detain the Committee by any idle declamation. —(Hear, from the Ministerial Bench.) Notwithsta dng the cheer of the Noble Lord, he would not, and he de clared he had not indulged in idle declamation. He had stated his opinion upon the clause generally, and he had not had an opportunity before. They had been engaged for a long time on the clause, it was true, but it was simply in correcting the language; and most necessary was this, for before it was amended it was not intelligible to the majority of the House, and he believed not to the Noble Lords themselves. Lord ALTHORP was of opinion that riots would not be more frequent by increasing the constituency, as it was generally the case that riots were occasioned by per sons who had not the elective franchise. He protested against the declaration that a change in the constituency of the country was not necessary; he maintained that it was necessary, and that it would have been useless and unwise to introduce any change less extensive than that they had proposed, because no less change would have given satisfaction to the people, though it wisuld be liable to all the objections with respect to prescription and so forth, which had beea urged by the Hon. Gentlemen op posite. The amount of the constituency prevented corruption. The bribery of 12 or 13,000 had never been known to exist to such an extent as to have any effect on an election. That was the case with respect to the larger towns. With respect to the smaller, the present Bill, it was admitted, had the effect of creating a higher constituency than before ; and in both respects, therefore, the Government had endeavoured to set up as good a barrier against corruption, .in both cases, as human nature would allow. The influence which this Bill would give to masters in manufacturing districts had been alluded to. He admitted it; but that influence was of a kind to which he did not more object than to the legitimate influence of landlords with their tenants. Colonel LINDSEY could not conceive how the Go vernment wou!d always be able to know when leases were bona fide, nor what check they could have on land lords cresting voters by fictitious leases. With respect to large constituencies never being corrupted, had not those of Liverpool and Dublin been corrupted to the extent of determining an election in a particular way ? Mr. C. WYNN entered his protest against the clause. lie observed that the Noble Lord ought rather to have endeavoured to direct his attention to produce a measure that would ensure a good constituency and representation. than one which should merely have the effect of being agreeable to the people. He denied that a large consti tuency was necessarily an independent constituency; for was it not notorious that men congregated together in large bodies were swayed by a particular cry—witness the no Popery cry and the cheap bread cry in our times. As to the assertion, that no election was ever determined in a large constituency by the effect of bribery and corruption, he referred the Noble Lord to the election for Westmins ter, in 1784, when, though there were 9 or 10,000 persons polled, the parties being pretty equal, the greatest degree of corruption prevailed. Lord LOUGHBOROUGH said that he should oppose the clause. The people would look to this Bill as a step ping-stone to a measure even more destructive to the Con stitution. As an independent Member of that House he owed it to his constituents, the electors of Great Grim stead, to oppose the clause especially, as iniquitous, revo lutionary, and republican.—(Cheers.) The question having been put, the clans,: was agreed to without a division. The other orders of the day were then disposed of, and the House adjourned at Hall-past One o'clock. The Scots Greys have received orders to march on the ht of September to London, where they will remain until after the Coronation, anti then, we be lieve, return to Brighton,--Brighton Gazette, POLICE INTELLIGENCE. UNION-HALL. On Thursday James Gully and Henry Settree, two men of gentlemanlike appearance, were brought before Mr. MURRAY on an alleged charge of fraudu lently obtaining the sum of 5/. from Richard Knowl son, under the pretence of employing him as a clerk at a salary of 1201. per annum. Richard Knowlson came up from the city of York about a fortnight ago, in order to seek employment in town, and brought away 1201. with him. On Thursday, the ISth instant, he saw an advertisement, the following of which is a copy, in the Morning Advertiser :—" Wanted, a person to fill a permanent and easy situation at a wharf, south side of the river, at two guineas per week. His integrity must be guaranteed by two sureties to the amount of 4001., or by a deposit of 2001. in money, or a transfer of stock of that value, for which he shall receive secu rity and full legal interest. Personal application only, at No. 5, Duke-street, Westminster, between eleven and four o'clock." On perusal of the above, complainant went to Duke -street, and from thence was directed to proceed to the Old Barge-house wharf, Upper Ground -street, Blackfriars, where he was informed he would see the principal. On his arrival at the wharf he saw both the defendants, and having told them the nature of his business, Gully questioned him relative to his former e mployment, and being told that he (complainant) had been in the wine and spirit trade at York, Gully immedi ately said, " You are just the kind of smart young fellow we want : my business is of great extent, and in order that you may qualify yourself for my col lecting clerk, I shall take you round the country to my customers." He spoke of having one of the most extensive collieries in the kingdom, and that he had just taken a lease of the Old Barge-house wharf, to commence business in the coal-trade. He then re verted to the business upon which complainant had called, and asked whether he was then enabled to enter into security for the faithful discharge of the du ties of the situation. The complainant, in answer, said, that he being a stranger in town, could not obtain the sureties for 4001., but that he was willing to advance 1201. as security for the performance of the duties, if he received a guarantee for the return of that sum when he required it, on leaving the situation. This was agreed to, and Gully asked him to pay down the money, saying that they had better close the business at once, as there were so many young men after the situation. The com plainant said, that he had not the 1201. then in his possession, and he was again urged to leave a de posit ; and filially, in that interview, gave Gully Si., saying, that he should be there in the evening with the remainder, to make up the 1201. The deposit was paid in the presence of Settree, whom Gully described as being his acting man ; and a kind of written agreement was given to the complainant on a sheet of common writing paper, stipulating that he should have interest after the rate of Si. per centum per annum for his money as long as it re mained in Gully's hands, and that the latter was to refund the same immediately after the employment ceased. This agreement both the defendants were extremely anxious the complainant should sign, but he refused doing so, and then went away. In the course of the evening, the complainant having heard a report disadvantageous to the parties, employed Mr. Games, a solicitor, to accompany him to the wharf, and when they got there both Gully and Settree refused to give up the 51., saying that the complainant might go before a Magistrate if he pleased and be --, for that he should not see the colour of his money again. The Magistrate asked Gully what he had to say in answer to the charge, and he immediately produced a parchment, and requested Mr. Murray to peruse its contents, saying that he would then perceive that he was a man of respectability and opulence. It was, he said, a lease of property belonging to him at Bream, in the forest of Dean, in the county of Glou cester, upon which estate he had a large colliery, which he was about to work. The Magistrate read some portion of the lease, and finding that the great estate and colliery there upon had been panted to James Gully for a con sideration of 201., he (the Magistrate) closed the parchment again, and, handing it back, said, that he had read quite enough to show him what kind of an estate the leaseholder was in possession of. " I want to know," added Mr. MURRAY, " what you have to say in answer to this charge ?" Gully then said, that being in want of a clerk, he advertised for one, and the complainant having applied for the situation, he was willing to treat with him upon his giving security to the amount of 1201. He admitted that he received a deposit of 51., and that he had refused to restore it back without the com plainant gave him the securities agreed upon in the first instance. Mr. MURRAY—What business do you carry on at this wharf, for it does not appear you are in want of a clerk ? Gully—At present lam doing nothing there, and have ju,t taken a lease of the premises. I have an order to supply the Commissioners of Woods and Forests with 600 tons of coals this week, which is to be followed up with 200 tons more per week. You see, therefore, that I shall require clerks. At this stage of the investigation Mr. MURRAY said that the defendant Settree was as deeply impli cated in the charge as Gully, and as the former at tended up to the moment merely as a spectator in the office, the Magistrate directed that he should be placed by the aide of the other defendant in the slip. Settree then entered into a long statement, which had little or no reference to the charge, in the course of which he talked about Gully's large estate in the forest of Dean, and of the extensive order that he had just received for coals from a Government office. On being asked by the Magistrate in what ca pacity he served Gully, whether in that of partner or clerk, he replied that he was merely a friend, and only attended until arrangements were made for carrying on the business with spirit. He added, that he had nothing whatever to do with the trans action in question, and only knew that Mr. Gully was too honourable a man to act unfairly with any one. Mr. MURRAY—Your statement may be true, but I very much doubt it. I want to know the reason the young man's money was withheld from him when he applied for it, on ascertaining there was no pro- bability of his obtaining employment. Settree said that the W. was kept to make him fulfil the engagement he had promised to enter into. He (Settree), however, had nothing to do with it. Mr. Games said that Gully stated at the wharf that he and Settree shared the money with each other, and he (witness) had n o d ou b t th e y were both actingin concert to defraud his client. Mr. MURRAY then put t h e f o ll ow i ng quest i ons to fo p r r i o n f e e r s l s y io a n o s r o t li r c a i d to e r, do bu y t ou a f m ollo n s o v w ? S S e e t t t t r r e e e e N ‘ V v a h s :-4 t out of practice. _ . Mr. MURRAY--Where do you li ve ? Settree— In Prospect-place, West -squa re . Mr. MURRAY—Have you any concern in this wharf that has been taken? Settree--None, what ever; I only attend there until arrangements are made for tilling the wharf with coals. Skillern, the officer, said that when he went to the Old Barge-house wharf to apprehend Gully, the other defendant, Settree, was there, who on learning the nature of his business, said, " For G o d's sake don't tak e hi m i nto c ustody yet; he i s at this moment in tre at y w i t h a gentleman, who is about becoming a partner,.and will advance 3 , 0 001. if you don't blow the gaff." Skillern said that he mus t do his duty, and accordingly proceeded into an old house on the wharf, in an apartment of which, meanly furnished, he found Gully in earnest conver sation with two other persons, all seated round a table, with a great quantity of parchment and papers before them. The officer added, that there was no description of property on the wharf, and that when lie took Gully into custody, the other two persons stared at each other with astonishment, and hastily withdrew. Mr. MURRAY said that the case was one of con siderable suspicion, not only as regarded one, but both the defendants. If he discharged them now, they would leave the office not only with a serious imputation against theth, l but also ra heavy stain upon their characters. Under these - circumstances, for the sake of the defendants, as well as for the sake of ))üblic justice, he should remand the defendants on the charge. Previously to the defendants being locked up, they were searched, and in Gully's possession 17 pawnbrokers' duplicates were found, and not a shil ling in money. Settree, the other defendant, re sisted the officer, and attempted to swallow some thing, which was found to be a counterfeit shilling. It is suspected that the defendants hired the pre mises for the purpose of obtaining money and goods on credit, and duping others in the manner the com plainant had been. COURT CIRCULAR. The Prussian Minister had a long conference with Earl GREY yesterday at the Treasury. His Excellency also visited Viscount PALMERSTON at the Foreign-office. The Spanish and Neapolitan Ministers had interviews with Viscount PALMERSTON yesterday, at the office of the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs. The Russian Ambassador received despatches yesterday from his Government. His Excellency forwarded a cow munic ition in the afternoon to Viscount PALMERSTON, Viscount ALTHORF, Lord Jour; RUSSELL, and the Earl of MULGRAVE, visited Earl GREY yesterday at the Treasury. FROM THE GAZETTE OF LAST NIGHT. St. James's Palace, Aug. M, IP3I. The King has been pleased to appoint the Marquis of Queens. berry one of the Lords of his Majesty's Bedchamber, in the room of the Marquis of Hastings, resigned. Foreign Office, Aug. 25. The King has been graciously pleased to appoint the Hon. Richard Bingham (sometimes attached to his Majesty's Legation at Madrid) to be Secretary to his Majesty's Legation at the Court of Munich. Crown-Office, August :16. MEMBER RITURNID TO SERVE IN THIS PRESENT PARLIAMENT. TowN or NEW Ross.—William Wigram of the city of London, Esq. in the room of Charles Tottenham, Esq., who has accepted the Chiltern Hundreds. War Office, Aug. 26. MEMORANDUM.—The half-pay of the under-mentioned Officers has been cancelled from the `26th inst. inclusive, upon their receiving a commuted allowance for their commissions, viz. Lieut. S. H. Lawson, half-pay 2d Dragoons ; Lieut. N. D'Arcy, half-pay 97th Foot; Lieut. J. J. Corry, half.pay 57th Foot; Ensign W. Beatty, half-pay Unattached; Hospital-Assistant T. W. Cahill, half pay Hospital Staff; Troop Quartermaster S. St. Clair, half-pay 13th Light Dragoons; Assistant-Surgeon J. Macleod, half i:ay Ist Foot; Lieut. W. H. Hill, half_pay Unat tached ; Capt. J. M'Donell, half_pay Incorporated Militia of Upper Canada ; Cornet D. Campbell, half-pay 12th Light Dra goons; Lieut. Hon. H. Lascelles, half-pay lit Foot Guards. Commission by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Cardigan. T. J. Wemyss, Esq. Esq. to be Deputy Lieutenant. DECLARATIONS OF INSOLVENCY. ROBERT BOAST, Hunslet, Leeds, innkeeper. JOHN NICOLL, Dunster, Somersetshire, spirit-merebant. BANKRUPTCIES ENLARGED. WILLIAM LEWIS, fleading, — ie;ii-hre , ;7l, from Sept. 2 to Sept. 9, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. MOSES KENT, Andover, Hants, draper, from Sept. 2 to Sept. 9, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. BANKRUPTS. ROBERT HOWELL PERKS, Monckton Combe, Somer setshire, brewer, to surrender Sept. 2,9, and Oct. 7, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Hutchison and Imeson, Crown court, Threadneedle-street. GEORGE DAWSON and JAMES KERR, Manchester, nankeen-manufacturers, Sept. 9, 10, and Oct. 7, at nine, at the York Hotel, Manchester. Johnson and Weatherall, Temple; Higson, Bagshaw, and Higson, Manchester. THOMAS HARRISON, Prince's-place, Commercial-road, woollen-draper, Sept. 2, 13, at three, and Oct. 7, at one, at the Court of Commissioners. Van Sandau, Old Jewry. ANNE DAWSON, Park-street, Grosvenor-square, lodging house-keeper, August 30, at twelve, Sept. 6 and Oct. 7, at one, at the Court of Commissioners. Teague, Lawrence-Pountney hill, Cannon-street. GEORGE DEUDNEY, Deptford, seed-crusher, Sept. 2, 13, and Oct. 7, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. Druce and Sons, Billiter.square. GEORGE TRIM WHITFIELD and JOHN SARG ANT, Whitchurch, Salop, silk-throwsters, Sept. It, at three, 15, and Oct. 7, at twelve, at the Red Lion Inn, `Vhitchurch. Blackstone and Bunce, King's-Bench.walk, Temple; Harpur, Whitchurch. JOHN CHARLES JAMES, Bathford, Somersetshire, stone merchant, Sept. 7,8, and Oct. 7, at eleven, at the Castle Inn, Bath. Makinson and Sanders, Elm-court, Temple; Hellings, Bath. JOHN WHITTBREAD, Everton, Lancashire, livery-stable. keeper, Sept. 5,6, and Oct. 7, at twelve, at the Clarendon rooms, Liverpool. Birkett, Liverpool; Blackstock and Bunce, King's- Bench-walk, Temple. DIVIDENDS. H. Wylie, Bank Chambers, City, merchant, Sept. 6, at two, at the Court of Commissioners—W. Pinnell, lip-Lambourn, Chip ping-Lambourn, Berkshire, farmer, Sept. 16, at eleven, at the Red Lion Inn, Chipping-Lambourn—W. Copeland, Liverpool, linen-draper, Sept. 19, at one, at Mr. Toulmin's office, Liverpool —E. Welidon, Cambridge, butcher, Sept. 16, at one, at the Black Bull Inn, Cambridge—W. Sainter, Kingston-upon-Hull, worsted manufacturer, Sept. 20, at twelve, at the Downe Arms Inn, Snaith, Yorkshire—A. Guy, Chippenham, Wiltshire, money scrivener, Sept. 19, at eleven, at the White Lion Inn, Bath—lt. Ravald, Manchester, ironmonger, October 3, at ten, at the York Hotel, Manchester—W. Jotham, Bradford, Wiltshire, clothier, Sept. 17, at one, at the White Lion Inn, Bath—J. Sainter, Scaith, Yorkshire, worsted-manufacturer, Sept. 90, at eleven, at the Downe Arms Inn, Snaith, Yorkshire. CERTIFICATES, SEPT. 16. T. C. Gogney, Longlands, Footscray, Kent, builder—W. C. Bromby, Kingston-upon-Hull, wharfinger—J. Fry, Liverpool, merchant—G. Johnson, York, merchant—H. Cook, Preston, Lancashire, coach-proprietor—R. Hoskin, Manchester, silk mercer—R. Taylor, Bristol, builder—J. Taylor, London-road, cheesemonger—S. Pattisall, 'Change-alley, Cornhill, banker—E. W. Bishop, George-street, Southampton-street, Pentonville, sur veyor—T. and It. F. Martin, London-wall, wool-brokers—W. Clark, Ilford, Essex, victualler—H. Bugg, jun. and G. Bugg, Spalding, Lincolnshire, bankers—T. Griffin, Belvedere_wharf, Belvedere-road, Lambeth, timber-merchant—W. Newton, Phil. pot-street, Commercial-road, Mile-end Old Town, builder. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. J., J. N., and W. H. Hawker, Plymouth, commission-mer chants, so far as regards W. H. Hawker—J. B. Heywood and J. W. Black, Greville-street, Hatton-Garden, grocers—J. Graham and J. Cathrick, Barnard-castle, Durham, linen-drapers—J. and W. Oakley, and W. Stott, Manchester, painters—M. Judson, J. Judson, J. Sugden, It. Sugden, M. A. Wilkinson, H. Wilkin son, and J. Sunderland, Castle-mill, Keighley, Yorkshire, wor sted-spinners, so far as regards J. Sunderland—R. and T. Rey nolds, Chancery-lane, dealers—W. and C. Cossum, Maidenhead, Berkshire, linen-drapers—E. and R. Peak, Goswell-street, St. Luke, carvers—L. Steinberg and A. Hay, Buckley-street, White chapel, skin-dressers—J. Hoy and' '. Hoy, jun., Epping, Essex, auctioneers—J. W. H. Hayne and J. G. H. Hawkins, Clifton. street, Finsbury-market, glassmen. MARKET INTELLIGENCE. LONDON MARKETS. (From the London New Price Current of yesterday.) SUGAR.-The demand for West India Sugars has been very steady this week, and rather more extensive than usual, the prices are without alteration. Sales 2,8 a) hhds. and trs. In the Refined Market there has been little change in the prices, but there is an improvement in the demand. In the shipping quail. ties this day there have been several parcels sold of the low qua lities, and good, entitled to the long bounty, at prices a shade lower; in the grocery descriptions there is less doing, and pur chases could be made at lower rates ; the Market closed very heavily this evening, Molasses 225. 6d. EAST INDIA SUGARS.-The public sale of Mauritius early in the week, 4,045 bags, sold at the Market prices. Bengal Sugars of the late East India House sale resold in some instances at a profit of tid. to Is. per cwt. This day's public sale 3273 bags, an ord. parcel of Mauritius, went off at lower prices, free brown 425. 6d. a 435. fat FOREIGN SUGARS.-There are considerable sales 'of white Havannah Sugar by private contract at Market prices ; lc 0 chests white Pernams sold at lower prices. This day public sales 213 boxes Havannah, the white all taken in, the yellow sold 21s. Gd. a 935. fad; 289 chests '2lO brls. Rios and Pernams, all taken in. WEST INDIA MOLASSES.-The: prices still nominal, on account of the stock here continuing under seizure for contain ing too great a proportion of sugar. COFFEE.-The public sales of Coffee this week have been limited as to quantity; the Jamaica descriptions have gone off with much spirit at rather higher prices. The East India sold Is. a ls. lid. higher than any previous prices. By private contract a parcel of inferior St. Domingo has been sold at 455. which is lower ; sonic coloury Brazil :realised full Market prices, 465. ; good ord. Sumatra 38s. 6d. ' which is full Market rate. This day's public sales 1351 bags Samarang sold at previous prices, 375. ext. and 385.; 276 bags Batavia 41s. Gd. and 42a. full prices ; 435 bags Mocha rather higher, 745. and 755. ; 80 bags Mysore, sound taken in 545. 6cl , chiefly damaged, which sold 435. a 475. ; 108 bales old Cheribon taken in at 445. 6€l. ; the 40;casks British Plan tation sold at full prices. The Coffee Market is firm. RUM, BRANDY, and HOLLANDS.-The purchases of Runs are chiefly confined to parcels of Leewards, 5 and 6 over, at ls. Gd., and proofs and under Is. sd. Some sales of Brandy are reported at rather lower rates, the best marks at 4s. sd. Geneva is unvaried. This evening large sales of Runs made for shipping, chiefly proofs and a lade over Is. 5%d. More sales of Brandy. Several purchases of pale Geneva at 2s. fxl. HEMP, FLAX, and TALLOW.-The Tallow market con tinues declining, the holders and speculators are anxious sellers, the price on the spot is 38s. 9d., and for arrivals :395. a 395. RI. Hemp is dull, and again lower. Flax is little varied. This evening the market is more Gum, 395. money, 3t3s. 3d. for for ward delivery. IRISH PROVISIONS.-Since our last of Tuesday no altera' tion in the price of Foreign Butter can be noted, but for Irish a trifling advance has been obtained ; however, the cheesemongers purchase very cautiously, looking for prices being lower, as the stock increases. For fine fresh singed Waterford Bacon there is a fair sale, but stale of every description sells slowly. Hams and Bladder Lard as last quoted, and very little doing in Beef or Pork. RICK-Bengal Rice is a shade lower, good white sold 14s. and 148. 6d. ; Carolina in more request. This day's public sale 500 bags Bengal Rice 14s. a 156. 6,1., ordinary to good white full prices. OILS.-There has been little variation in Oils this week, the Purchases reported by private contract are inconsiderable. The public sales this day are higher than anticipated, pale Southern 291. 10s. TOBACCO.-There are no purchases to any extent. This evening 150 hhds. 'Virginia '2Nal. a 3d. INDIGO.-The Indigo market continues in a nominal state. COTTON.-The Cotton market is Finn. The purchases this week consist of 50 Bengals, ordinary 4d., fair 4%d. ; 720 Surats, ordinary 4d., good ‘l . d. ; 120 Pernams,. fair 7 l z id. a 7 1 4 d.; 290 Boweds, middling 5%d. good 634 d. This day's public sales went prices oft' at previous prices ; '1,019 bales Madras 534 d. to 5%d. chiefly sold at 5%d. at 5%d ; 181 bales Carriacou taken in ; of 59 bales Perus ar 'i l a ic. n u, s itrt : ie 'tt : SA LTPETRE.-The private sales are Fast India Company's ;said Saltpetre at 435., and for good roughs 395. Gd. Public sales this day '2,471 bags Madras Saltpetre, good quality sold at 38.5., yeafrcryat re fraction ordinary, refractionasko e ld n a i i 3 a 2 t s 2r . r refraction 2,soe ntb..3g4111. Saltpetre e s nt . tri e a 3 i f i v i rs l 0. 3 r . 2 1 s , C . h pe e are very low, but we cannot yet state the effect that these sales will have on the market prices for good quality. FRUIT.-In Currants there has been some extensive business done privately this week, Cephalonia and Zante from 665. to fits. Wednesday 132 butts and 61 careteels were brought to public sale, part damaged ; the Patras being of a mixed quality, sound sold trom 675. a 70e. damaged 655. a 665.; a great part of the Cephalonia were taken in at 67i., There are further.arrivals. PRICE OF SU The average price of Brown or 3 from the Returns made in the week per cwt., exclusive of the duties of cus on the importation thereof into Grea PRICES OF HOPS. Kent Pockets Sussex Ditto Yosex Ditto ••••••• Farnham Ditto, Fine U Seconds 0 Kent nags ‘.24 Sussex Ditto Essex Ditto.. Duty laid at 151 PRICE OF I Rape Oil, brown .....L...... --- 87. 05.., ' Linseed Oil - Linseed Oil Cake at the Mill, per t Rape Cake, per ton PRICES OF Per lb. d. to d. Butts i 0 to 561 b.... 15 21 Ditt0—......60 to 661 b.... 15 23 Dressing Hides--... 14 15j Fine Coach Hides i 7 181 Crop Hides, 35 to 40Ib. 12j 131 Ditto to 451 b. 141 16 Ditto RAW HID Per Stone. s. d. tds.d. Hest Heifers & StQers2 8 3 0 Ord Middlings 2 4 2 6 Mai SHEEP SKI Long Wool ......... OA. 0(1. to O. OLL I Shc Lamb 5—........- Is. ti WHITECHAPEL HAY M Hay 50s. Od. to "735. 01 I ( 10 , 24a. 0 PRICE OF POTATO New Potatoes PRICE OF TALLOW Town Tallow ...--.. 435. Od. Yellow Russia 40s Od White 41s. 3d. Soap Ditto 395. Od. Melted Stuff 345. O. Ditto Rough 29.5. Od. PRICE OF RAW FAT, Price of Tallow (as stated by the Tall PRICE OF The price of Store Candles, in t Candles, per doz. is. Od. to Bs. Od. COAL MAR Bentham Main ..---... Dean's Primrose.--ws Garesfield Hebburn Main Holywell__ Killingworth Ord's Iterihugh Panto!, Wintlsor Shipcote South Holywells 23 6 Townley 25 6 Willington 29 0 Wylam En.i Callerton Ditto Bell,Robson,&Co. 27 0 Ditto Bewicke and Co. 25 6 Walls End Carr and Co. '26 3 Walls End Greenwell 27 6 Walls End Gosforth —3O 3 Walls End Heaton 3O 9 Walls End Hilda ps at market, 534--Shi 245. Od. 25 0 9 28 3 26 6 27 3 24 6 25 0 24 6 COUNTRY CORN MARKETS I Wheat. Per Quarter. Ashburn Basingstoke 72 82 60 76 48 70 58 72 56 64 64 '7O 68 72 66 70 60 70 57 67 62 '7O 40 64 52 71 Bath Bridgewater Bristol. Chesterfield Derby Devizes Doncaster Dorchester Exeter Gloucester. flungerford Leicester.- Newbury R OM sey Shaftesbury Shepton Mallet Sherborne . Yeovil . —. Per Bushel. Shrewsbury 56 60 60 66 60 66 60 64 58 72 64 68 s. d. s. d. 89 98 Barli The Court Journal of a of singular interest, under the 1 Wedding," the subject of which h of our most eminent female writ graving, familiar to all persons o The Bridesmaid. The paper it wholly imaginative, but embodies particulars relative to the fair orig of art. AGNES DE MERANIE.- was ever subjected to greater tria of PHILIP' At:Gums. Her mis have commenced on her marriage by the PorE. Notwithstanding which was unbounded, and the fi band rendered even the thoughts of yet, when the unhappy condition personal safety—and the injunct Duke of Israta—demanded such to make the sacrifice, though at pinesa. The p tges of romance sel picture of all that is good and gre ter, as that which is given of tbi Mr. JAMES'S sew Novel of Phili, NIYSTERIOUS DEATHS.- has been for some days past in a and anxiety respecting the fate of mysteriously disappeared on Thuri Roy, a cabinet-maker and one o band, and EuzAmint MEADLEY, he had long paid his addresses, a at a dance, returned to her houu proving of their daughter's intima him affected by liquor, requested He dill so ; but persuaded the you him to the door. There they I were seen to quit the spot sudden) and she dissuading him from tn This was the last time they were severing search for some days but in the River Ure, at a considerable where they are supposed to have his death was his own voluntary having frequently declared, when destroy himself. Respecting In vague surmise ; a cloud of mystt no human eye can penetrate. 2 been held, but the result has Intelligencer. We are indebted to a g fur the particulars of a shockini Sunday of last week, in Naples, B. TORREY, a merchant of Napl tion, on Sunday, tile 17th of Ju his own son, ten years old, with by the legs and dashed his head house with such violence as to b beat the poor child's head literal! jack. The dead body was disc( noun. The murderer is iu gaol a was addicted to intemperance. of bad treatment, was driven In since. He was a merchant, and, in this city with whom he dealt this unutterable anguish comes I of drinking.—Albany Evening . The cholera morbus has pity of Berlin and Vienna. N latter and shut up their establish" BIRTHS On the 24th inst. at the \ icarai wife of the Rev. W. Borradaile, of a On the 25th inst. at Stratton Stra the Rev. W. A. Keppel, of a son. On the 22d. inst. at Northfleet, lie head, Esq., of a daughter. MARRIEI On the 20th inst. at St. Paul's, Del W. Daniel, of Great 'Power-etreet, t Tokely, Esq. of Erith Cottage, Old On the 25th inst. at Kensington, inington ' Hants, to Frances, daugh Esq., of Stockwell. On the .4th inst. at Pleasley, Charl F.sq., of Oakland, Worcestershire, h. of H. Hollins, Esq. of Pleasley, On the 25th inst. at Marylebone, of C. H. Tracy, Esq., of Toddington, Elizabeth Alicia, youngest daughter of Penrhyn Castle, North Wales. DIED. On the 2.5 th inst. at the Rectory, I nee, second son of the late R. Ware, n the 24th inst. at Hockley, Esse On the 21th inst. at Battersea-rise of 'l'. Whitehurst, Esq , of Nine Eli On the .24th inst. at Margate, aged On the list inst. at BouMgne-stir. by a carriage, Frederick Aide, eldest grandson of the late Admiral Sir G. On the t.k/th inst. at P.iris, at the Grenelle St. Honore, M. J. P. Bench Piccadilly, aged 37. PRIMED AND PUBLIMIED BY ~iL bUN_OFFIcE, 112, STHA Tar Spat Cal Dit Dit Sul: , SC Yell Mot Wh Gra Go,- cer the re . I M Old Ray Silks Sous Gres Igo so