The Sun. — London, England, 1834-12-15 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. " Between office and me a wide guff exists," was tivi: voluntary but advised declaration of Sir Robert Teel on the 7th of February, 1833, in the discussion on the Addre,s:s, The Right Honourable Baronet, it now appears, is precipitated into this wide gulf by his most ultra Tory associates ; and all his exertions to save himself from the frightful and yawning abyss, have proved unavailing— " Sepulchres themselves most crumbling fall In Time's abyss, the common grave of all." The declaration by Sir Robert Peel, that office and himself were " wide as the poles asunder," was in fact a mature and sensible conclusion after the reform of the representation. Throughout all the debates on the Reform Bills, in 1831 and 1832, no Member of Par liament more clearly discerned or more boldly stated the consequences of the passing of those great legislative measures of constitutional regeneration. Lord John Russell and his colleagues prudently abstained from drawing the whole curtain aside ; and the Re formers, not in office, kept their opinions very much to themselves. But Sir Robert Peel on every opportunity, and by the most marked em phasis of speech, acknowledged the downfal of Toryism consequent on Parliamentary Reform ; and further predicted the impossibility of any Administra tion conducting the affairs of Government ; meaning thereby, that neither Tories nor Tory principles could again maintain an ascendancy in the Councils of the King, and that the Royal prerogative of the choice of Ministers would be henceforth controlled in its exer cise by a Reformed House of Conammons. In his first oration against the English Reform Bill, on the 3d of March, 1831, the Right Hon. Baronet broadly argued that the Ministerial scheme substituted a new con'Aitution in lieu of the old one ; or, according to our version, restored to the people their ancient rights of representation in the Commons House of Parliament, by the abolition of the rotten and nomination boroughs, and the enfranchisement of the populous unrepre sented towns. We will not dispute about words. A revolution was effected in 1832 ; and the Royal Prerogative was redeemed from the thrald;,, n of the Boroughmongers and the Tory party, - - "Who for a century and a half had made the Crown and the Representative Council of the ration a base in strument of the Tory Aristocracy. Sir Robert Peel, wily in his appeals to the i zatousies of the Sovereign, and to the terrors of the Aristocracy, in the discussion of the second EngiiSh Reform Bill, 22d of March, 1832, ingenuously stated, " that by the very act of making all- places necessarily places of popular elec tion, you have effectually put an end to the exercise of this prerogative of the Crown, and, so far, worked a revolution in the state." Indeed the Right Honourable Baronet foresaw and predicted his present extraordinary perplexity. He discerned the future labyrinth of Toryism, the inextricable windings of which he well knew that he could not thread. Theseus killed the Mino taur, and escaped by the clue of Ariadne from the laby rinth of Crete ;• but the Tamworth Baronet will find it impossible by the finest .spun cotton, to grope his way through the mazes of his present position, and to destroy the power of the Reform Bills. In the same speech he described his present political puzzle : " Should the King ever feel it necessary to exercise an unpopular prerogative, I own that when this mea sure (Reform) comes into operation, I see almost in surmountable difculties in the way of that prerogative beiajexercised. Should the Kin g;lesire to remove a popular Administration ,how will it be possible for him to do so? No doubt h e i s a bl e to effect it now : but what a fatal delusion would it be to take that as the paramount rule in this country The con sistent Baronet, viewing himself in the mirror of this day's looking-glass, then continued to expose the possible degradation of the Tories, if the Crown should displsce a popular Government who he admitted would have no alternative of re taining office, but by the scandalous sacrifice of their political principles in the adoption of the policy of the ex-Ministers. With prophetic spirit Sir Robert Peel predicted that the Tories, if they took office, would be " compelled to court popular favour by making sounding speeches about the liberty of the press, and gaining the favour q f the popul ace by th e most despicable p ros tit u ti on qf their minds and ac quirements r • Sir Robert Peel, and the members of his embryo Cabinet, must be either real Reformers or anti-Reformers. Mock reform will not serve even a temporary purpose. Tory principles will not live a week.with the present, or the meditated new Parlia ment. Swift acutely describes the distressing situation of the subtle Baronet— " A strong dilemma in a desp'rate case ! To act with infamy, or quit the place." Now what is our unparalleled political position, and who is Sir Robert Peel, the chosen leader of the Court, the nominee of the Great Captain of the Tory Peers? The King has dismissed a popular, an un tried Ministry —one from w hi c h t h e country h ope d and expe c t e d much. The journals of the Tory suc cessors of this Ministry have raised the cuckoo note of " Measures, not Men." Our contemporary the Spectator, acutely observas, that the meaning of this -convenient phrase is " Men, not measures." If the Court and the Tories upset the Cabinet of Lord Mel bourne, not because they objected to its pledged po licy of Reform, but from personal hatred of the men, they are factious, and prefer public discord to prin ciple; if they accomplished its downfall to defeat the ends of Parliamentary Reform, where is their wisdom or possibility of party success ? 'What re-action has taken place in any part of the United Kingdom.? Is Irish Church Reform less boldly required by Ireland ? Are the English people more enamoured of Church sinecures, non-resi dences, the exorbitant wealth of the dignitaries— or the poverty of the working Clergy ? Are the middle classes greater idolators of self-elected and Tory Corporations ? Are the Protestant Dissenters better satisfied with Church -rates, with forcible con formity to the Establishment in respect to civil rights, with exclusion from the advantages of English Uni versities, chiefly founded by their Catholic ancestors for common benefit ? After a general election, will the Reformers be less clamorous against the existing defects of the Representative System? Even idiots must see that, .as Tories, the embryo Ministers will rush to immediate suicide ; that, as Reformers, they will be eternally disgraced—broken up as a party, and gibbeted for the gaze of future historians. But they cannot be Reformers ; they know not how to perpe trate their iniquity, if so minded. Sir Robert Peel is an orator, not a Statesman. He has disqualified himself as a Liberal Minister. The Tory party has decked him out as the victim of their last sacrifice. They are practising the " fatal delusion" on the Sovereign so well described by the new Premier in 1832. The Mansion-house, we hear, is to be the altar where the victim will be offered up, and the temple of " sounding speeches." The Lord Mayor" (whose character stands recorded by the Tories — in a 'Treasury Minute of February, 1814) is to provide an occasion for the Tory Pharisees and hypocrites, in the Egyptian-hall. There, we presume, the new Mini sters will seek the " favour of the populace by the most despicable prostitution." The people will not, however, be deluded by Sir Robert Peel. We cannot think that he will -dare to attempt deceiving them. The Baronet never was a Reformer ; he cannot act the farce ; he knows not how to play his part, or wear the mask. To plunge into the wide " gulf between himself and office," is one feat ; to escape destruction by the leap, is another act, considerably more difficult. We shall see whether the new Curtius will save his country at the cost of his own existence. The chasm will soon close over the modern Roman.—. Morning Chronicle. • We rejoice to state that our anticipations have been fully realized. The very names of Chandos, Murray, Knatchbull, Baring, Goulburn, and Herries, afford a triumphant reply to the cavils and affected doubts of 'our ex-Ministerial contemporaries, and hold out to the country prospects which we began to apprehend the folly, imbecility, and profligacy of the " Omnibus Medley" had for ever concealed from our sight. Where is now the lingering hope that the Administration could not be formed ? Where the " flattering unetion" that men would not be found prepared to rescue the of epiricism and misrule ? ;ed and selfish triumph with , licalism received the announce !y had refused to give his empire from the effects NVh44, l ftla t •iltictigEress e w*TiTrjhe - otßipro r4adi , ts.t. 1 ,7, v it• . . A f/ itt*GaJla official support to the Ministry of Sir Robert Peel ? We regretted, and still regret s Lord Stanley's re fusal, for the talents and acquirements of the Noble Lord we have always appreciated fully. We do not accuse Lord Stanley of Improper motives, or of being under the influence of personal considerations ; but we are certain nevertheless that had the Duke of Wellington or Sir Robert Peel been placed in a similar position, neither would have refused to lend their powerful aid, nor have shrunk from the du ties which the possession of superior talents, or of a very great stake in the country imposes as an honour able burden on the intellect and wealth of the land. It is quite impossible, however, that Lord Stanley can with hold his support from a Mi n i s t ry con d ucte d on t h e principl es which will, we have no doubt, influence the new Cabinet, nor can any personal considerations be expected to interfere, unless it be to render that sup port more animated and zealous, when we consider that the prompt and cordial communication made by Sir Robert Peel, and the liberal terms (if report speak truly) offered to the Noble Lord, testify the high con sideration entertained for his abilities, and the generous value set upon his services. Had Lord Stanley ac ceded to those terms the country must have been, we suppose, deprived of the assistance of some of those Gentlemen whose accession to office we have this day the gratification of announcing. To such men indeed possession of place and dignity can only be desirable as enabling them to advance those principles they have ably and consistently advocated, and to promote the honour and welfare of the country, in the prosperity of which they are so deeply interested. Can Mr. Baring desire to change the comfort and splendid ease which his exertions and talents have so justly earned for tin turmoil and responsibility of public life, at no time an easy duty, but at this moment fraught with labour and to'.l ? Or is it to be imagined that Lord Chandos and Sir Edward Knatchbuli, country Gentlemen in the best and most extended. sense of that truly British ex pression, could. "eutrenaer the enjoyments and privileges which th.:., love and respect of a grateful tenantry and th; combined power and will of doing good afford in abundance for the difficulties and harrassing cares of official life, were they not impelled by a stern and imperious sense of their public duty ? What a splendid contrast do these men exhibit to the miserable faction from whose galling misrule we are just liberated. Place a Peel against an Althorp, a Wellington against a Palmerston, a Knatchbull in the scale with a Little ton, a Chandos in the balance with an Abercomby, a Lyndhurst with a Brougham, a Murray with a Hob house, and a Baring with a Thomson, and—but we will not insult our readers by adventuring a further comparison than the juxta-position of their names. If the combination of virtue, talent, honesty, intellect, and wealth, can save a nation, Britain may be, even now, by the blessing of God, preserved, yet be re stored to her pristine posterity, behold her trade re vive, her commerce increase, her agriculture flourish, her flag which has for a thousand years "braved the battle and the breeze," wave in peaceful triumph under the auspices of a Christian patriot King, under the conduct of an able, united, and constitutional Admi - nisi ration.—Morning Post. With every resp ec t ourse l ves towards departed Royalty, we cannot but think that the mode now adopted of performing the last obsequies towards its r2mains is both absurd in itself, and heedlessly cruel towards those who, either from duty or kind fecEng, are called upon or induced to take part in those cere monies. Why upon earth a Royal corse should be consigned to its last home at midnight, instead of in broad day, and why persons officiating on such occa sions should be compelled to remain, at such unsea sonable hours, on a cold pavement around the damp and dreary vault of the Royal charnel-house, we cannot, in the most remote degree, conceive. 'We need not say how much the danger and inconvenience on such oc casions are enhanced, when the season happens to be that of winter, and when the mourners or attendants ar.:! persons either of advanced age or delicate health. We are, unfortunately, not without examples of death having ensued from an adherence to a practice equally at variance with reason and good taste. We trust that no such consequences will he the result of the last sad exhibition of the kind which we have had to record, though we cannot help thinking that a warning might have been taken from the past to have prevented the necessity of adverting to tile subkct. We might as well see " t ouc hi ng f or t h e evil ' revived, as these midnight solemnitie s p ers i s t e d i n , w hi c h , as f ar as any r_asonable object or motive goes, have no better foun dation.—Morning Herald. If we could have properly obeyed the impulse of our personal feelings with respect to the correspondence which has taken place between Sir R. Peel and Dr. Lushington, we should very gladly have availed our selves of our discretionary power to exclude it from our columns. The subject is an unpleasant one, hav ing relation to a personal difference, and that differ ence moreover arising out of expressions such as have seldom been employed by public men, either in illus tration of reasoning, however important, or of the po litical conduct of an adversary, however imbittered may be their strife. The language, indeed, which it now seems to be admitted that Dr. Lushington had recourse to, was such that we actually struck it out of our ac count of what occurred at the Tower Hamlets meet ing, from a real suspicion that the report was erro neous, and that the insertion of the passage complained of by Sir R. Peel might have been looked upon by the learned Doctor as an offence —nay, an outrage against his own reputation. Dr. Lushington seems to have forgotten two facts, of some moment on an occasion like that alluded to, and of which . the re collection might have enabled him to enhance, instead of impairing, the effect of his words,—viz., Ist, that he is a Judge ; 2d, that in the case we speak of, he was inevitably a biassed party. But, turning from Dr. Lushington's rhetorical figures to his argu ment, we must make free and declare our opinion, that from the frequency with which the latter has been misapplied, within the last three or four weeks,. and the equal number of refutations it has met with, the learned Doctor might more profitably have betaken himself to some more novel course of remark. The Doctor explains his object to. have been to support the position (read supposition) that it was probable the new " Administration, having always opposed re form, ought not to be trusted with carrying into effect the measures expected to result therefrom." Now this inaptitude to change their views cf political questions is rather oddly asserted of men, whose change of opi nion. as to the expediency of adopting one vast and memorable measure did in truth effect the most essential, and, in ON judgment of the majority of lib era l liolitlcians throughout Eng land, the ver; most beneficial improvement in our constitn...,oh, which, next to the Reform Bill, has ever yet been completed since the revolution of 1688 ; and to what cause did the Duke of Wellington and Sir Robert Peel themselves ascribe their final acqui escence in Catholic Emancipation ? We pray all men who are capable of calm reflection, and not the mere hirelings of exasperated party, to consider this point well. We affirm, therefore, that the ground on which those two Statesmen justified their adoption of a mea sure which they had before rejected, was precisely that which goes most powerfully to fortify the conviction we have all along expressed about their future policy. They said, that although they still retained their old opinions, they found the public sentiment too strong for theirs, and deferred to it for 'the sake of peace ! Then let us ask, can these be the persons whom we arc daily reviled and stigmatized for representing as likely to yield to the pressure of opinion, and to ac complish, on the demand of the people, those sup plementary reforms which the state of the country calls for ? If it be said that it i s b etter to have men for Ministers, who, in their sweeping eagerness after improvement in the abstract, will first hallo on the nation to try experiments, and then outstrip it in the race, and hurry forward one change after another, without digesting or maturing any, by pointing to their achievments in the gross, that they may be able to exclaim 4‘ See how much ground we have galloped over —see 'what a mass of alterations we have made," —if, we say, there be Reformers that esteem such Mi nisters of more value than men who are satisfied to wait upon their countrymen, and to follow the lead poi'ated out by the collective intelligence of the na tic,h, we are not of • their s c h oo l. Wh a t e ver may be 4h" case ix ordinary periods, to us it seems all but NUN, LONDON, MONDAV I DMEMIIER 15, Isl 4 ihrenzy to deny that great practical changes in the in ititutions of a country can seldom if ever be justified, if not preceded by a peremptory national call. But let it be thoroughly understood as our persuasion, that if this call be irresistible, under a free constitu tion like that now possessed by England, so are there specific questions on which it has already made itself ruclilrle amoirst us, and which in principle nay be l oo k e d upon as long since carried. Such t,re the two paramount questions--Ist, of Church -eform in Ireland and here, involving a purification of ell abuses in discipline, and a commutation of one fund for another, to provide a subsistence for ttie Church ; 2fl, of corporate re f orm , compre h en di ng, a 4 moval of all those grievances which grow out of the !orrupt and oppressive alienation of corporate funds and corporate powers from the hands to which they had been originally entrusted, and from the ends to which they had been destined. These two classes of reforms are as fully passed in principle by the country as the Reform Bill was passed in its details and technicalities by the Legislature two years ago. No Government can resist these two momentous -eforms, or either of them—no Government can dare •0 postpone their introduction to Parliament. The purification of church discipline, we say once more. the commutation of tithe, the better distribution o! :hurch revenues, and the redress of corporation griev ances, are as much carried in principle as if they were the law of the land, and wo be to him who ventures to impede their execution. What, then, is the next subject of inquiry for the people ? Undoubtedly "by whom the above great measures are to be carried." And a question follows, whom have tee at our orders to com plee them ? By the successive dispersions of the first Cabinet of Lord Grey, the secession of the Stanleys, next of Lord Grey himself, and subsequently the forced exit of Lord Spencer, even without the last step resorted to by his Majesty, the Liberal party, that portion of it at least which has usually been desig nated as " Whig," had become sensibly weakened and disorganised. We never insinuated that even in that condition of comparative inefficiency the late Ca binet might not have contrived to go on a little longer. All we contended for was, that his Majesty thought they could not, and under that impression he did an act which was for the time irretrievable. The country, therefore, will perceive at once the difference between the respective qualifications of the two sets of Minis ers, whether defects or capabilities. The Melbourne Cabinet had been engaged in reform measures, and was pledged to them ; but, pledged or otherwise, it could not for its life have relinquished them, for it was in a groove from which the nation would not suffer it to escape ; but we may make bold, without offence or unkind feeling, to add, that as body it was by no means eminent for the or business talents of its mem bers. Its spirit might be willing, but its skill was w ea k. Now the Conservatives who have succeeded the last Whig Cabinet have succeeded also to the obligations and moral necessities imposed upon them by the wall of the people. They are forced into the very same groove, and must proceed in the same direction as their predecessors, or as a Government, cease to exist. There is no use in saying that if the Conservatives could have chosen for themselves, they would have preferred a rotten-borough system to the present. They cannot. The new system is that of whi c h they have now become parts. It has clothed them with its own nature. It has prescribed to them the conditions under which only they can live. The strongest galley slave will do the most work at the oar, though a feebler one might have less repugnance, and if the former Ministers were (though many of them, we fear, but nominally) volunteers in the cause of re form, it is not too much to set off against that advan tage that the Conservative party, albeit impressed into the service, contain more able seamen amone , them. It will be expected that we should say something of the new Cabinet. We have nothing to say. Indeed, notwithstanding the confidence with which several Evening Papers published lists of the Ministers, we believe that at the time of their publication nothing was settled. It is possible that some of the names mentioned may be the real names, but surely Mr. Fleury Baring is not to be a Cabinet Minister. Mr. A. Baring may be the person meant. He is respect able for talent, wealth, and moral character ; but if we look at him in his Parliamentary position, we see a man speaking one way and voting another. Can a mind so peculiar be of much use in a Cabinet—can its judgment and firmness be relied upon ? There are other names which have occasioned much surprise ; but we can wait till we see the official announcement of our nation, he could not help exclaiming, What folly I what absurdity I The man who believed them was an idiot-=the • man who avowed his belief in them was a traitor. How did men act in private life ? Did they confide in convicted swindlers ? If they wanted a wife, did they take a prostitute kiln the §tietts ?" These are strong expressions; they arc homely, but they are honest, and the parallel is to the purpose. They are literally these :—you bid us confide the liberties of Englishmen to those who have been the constant and avowed enemies of liberty in every nation which has made the slightest movement for the obtainment of freedom. It is true that Sir Robert has never offered to take the sword in the cause of tyranny and mental enslavement. Sir Robert has not done this, whatever he may be, he is not for an appeal to the sword ; but he lids in all eases been consenting to those who have drawn the sword— he has been the avowed friend and partisan of those ~ vho have, on all occasions, been ready to crush freedom in the bud, in what part soever it appeared. There is not, therefore, the smallest hope of one liberal measure for the people of England from him, even if he were at the head of an Administration ; and, though he has heen nominated as First Lord of the Treasury, the Duke of Wellington is, in truth, the Premier. Sir Robert must he considered as the nominee of the Duke, not as the choice of the King. The Administration must, therefore, he regarded as a military Administration—a rule of the sword and the manacles; and any feint movement which an Administration may make apparently in favour of liberty, m any form or for any pretended object, can be no thing else than a pretence for lulling the vigilance of the people, in order that the chain may be doubled in weight, and riveted tegfold in some oilier way. Now is the time for the people—let them speak out, con stitutionally of course, but boldly, firmly, and man fully. They must not listen to the voice of delusion. Bad men never did, and they never will, either origi nate or support good measures. This is impossible— contrary to their nature ; he who believes it is, in the language of Dr. Lushington, "an idiot;" and he who attempts to make others believe it is, in deed, " a traitor," and a traitor of the worst kind, as one who attempts to persuade others that that is true which he himself knows full well to be false. The people of England arc not, however, to be abused in this manner ; and though we lay no claim to the gift of prophecy, we hesitate not to say, that the Duke and his subalterns will have the hardest task in which they ever were engaged, in patching up an Administration. We, therefore, think that the move ment will in the end be of '' yeoman service " to the cause of reform ; and that if the people must shew that they are in the field and do their duty to them selves, their children, and all generations to come, like men, and freemen, they will soon have the satis faction of seeing the attempt of the illiherals, fade away into the nothing of perfect inanition—a con summation devoutly to be wished by every honest friend to England and to man. —Morning Advertiser. COURT OF CHANCERY, DEC. 13. SOARES V. GOWER. In this case the plaintiff laid claim to certain bonds, the produce of a loan raised for the service of the Aliguelite Go vernment in Portugal, and which are now in the hands of the defendant, the plaintiff having the counterparts. An injunction was obtained from the Vice-Chancellor, restrain ing the defendant from negotiating or otherwise disposing of these bonds, and the matter was subsequently argued seve ral times at great length before Lord Brougham, who ulti mately intimated an opinion that the injunction must be continued, and a receiver appointed, unless the ,defendant found security for the monies which might come into his hands as the produce of the bills. Although this was his Lordship's opinion he pronounced no definite order to that effect, but observed, nevertheless, once or twice, when the matter was mentioned to him, just before he gave up the Great Seal, that he thought he had disposed of the point at issue. The LORD CHANCELLOR declined to interfere. He knew nothing of the case ; but as far as he saw from what was before him, Lord Brougham had intimated an opinion on the point at issue, and afterwards informed the parties that if they furnished him with a note of what had taken place at different times, he would pronounce a final judg ment. There was some confusion in the matter which his Lordship could mot attempt to unravel ; but if the parties pleased, they could apply to Lord Brougham himself on the subject. new rulers.—Times. A few days ago we called the attention of our readers to the absurdity of the promulgated report that the return of the Tories to office would change them to reformers, and that the mere fact of their having power would make them become the advocates of those measures of which, out of power, they were systematic and uncompromising opposers. This is a new view of the virtue of mere office, and one which any man must see is contrary to the whole tenour of past experience. It has always been the natural ten dency of office to corrupt those by whom it is held, or in other words, to become corrupt itself, and to infect the holders with a portion of the corruption. This is the very principle which renders reform by the people necessary ; and we have ever found, in the whole course of politics, in what country sower we make our observation, that there has never been any reform in any government, in which reform has not emanated from the people, and from the peo ple only. There is no need for citing particular in stances of this, b ecause t h ere i s not one instance of opposition to it ; and it may, therefore, be laid down as an axiom, that the people are the source of and the men in eice are the source of all cor ruption. This-Axiom must never be lost sight of, as it is the only one upon which we can proceed in fram ing a prospective judgment of the conduct of public men. We may rest assured that, be the men who they may, and their professions what they may, they never will, when in office, act completely up to those pro fessions which they make when appealing to the pub lic for its support in the attainment of office. This holds, in part at least, in the case of the most liberal minded of official men. They become, to a certain extent, attached to office, for the sake of office ; and therefore the public must, even in their case, discount a little of the expectation which is formed of them. The Whigs and their Reform Bill prove the only great exception on record. But if such be the case with those who are sent into office from the people, and by the people, how much more must it be the case with those who are not of the people—who have been trained and nurtured in opposition to every popular feeling—who have been literally bred, and, during their Whole lives, in opposition to every thing iberal. A Conservative, in the common acceptation of the term, is a conservator of what ? Why of all. ! offices, and all abuses of office. Those who wish, for their own selfish ends, to sacrifice the country at the footstool of the Tory Minister, affect to persuade us that the Duke and Sir Robert, and those whom they may be pleased to enlist as their assistants, will carry on measures of reform. The allegation is not true—it is false in fact and unfounded in philosophy—an at tempt at deception through which even a child can see. What is its foundation ? Whn, simply this, that the men who were formerly in office who were opposed to all reforms, and who, in the time of the Reform Ministry, though beaten by numbers, were not convinced by argument, or one jot altered in sen timent or disposition, will now, that they are again in power, support those very measures which it has bee❑ the whole business of their lives to oppose. They who say so must have some sinister mot►ve for so say ing—must be bought, or c*ed for sale, to the party in whose favour they attempt to abuse the public ear. That " men do not gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles," is an aphorism of high authority, and not the less true that it is old ; and any one who reflects for a moment will see how perfectly it applies to the case in hand. The words of Dr. Lushington, a staunch and hearty Reformer, and by no means a violent one, as delivered at the Tower Hamlets meeting on Th irs (lay last, and received with very marked applause, are so applicable to the present case, and so well worthy of being borne in mind, that we cannot refrain from quoting them When he heard people say, for God's sake trust the Duke I for heaven's sake listen to Sir Robert Peel I and remember Catholic Ernanei-‘ VICE-CHANCERY COURT, DEC. 13. PARKER V. LLOYD. Mr. COOPER had to make a very novel motion in this cause under two re cen t A c t s o f P ar li amen t, the 2d Wil liam IV., c. 33, and the 4th and sth William IV., c. 82. The first Act authorised service of process in all suits con cerning lands situate in England or Wales, or in Ireland, to be made upon any defendants resident in any part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, or the Isle of Man ; and the second Act extended the provisions of the forme r Act to any suit concerning incumbrances upon land, or concerning money vested in the public funds or public shares in public companies ; and to any defendant resident out of the United Kingdom. This very important altera tion was scarcely known to the profession, as the Act was only passed last August. Under the former Act his Honour held in M'Master v. Lomax that service might be made upon a defendant in Scotland. The late Lord Chan cellor, however, refused to extend the benefit of the Act to such a case. The present suit relates to a considerable sum of trust money in the funds ; and in anticipation of it the two defendants have removed out of the jurisdiction. One of them, Macintosh, is resident in Edinburgh ; and the other, Lloyd, is a man who has taken a lead in th e fashionable circles at Naples. The object of the motion was to obtain an order for service of subpwna on these defendants. His HONOUR having examined the Act, said it directed service abroad, but did not supply the Court with officers to execute its commands. But if the person making the service were to return to this country and make the affi davit here, he did not see why that would not do. Mr. COOPER was anxious to make this motion to-day, as he understood a King's messenger was going to Naples this evening, and that he would produce the proper affida vits required by the Act in the course of the day. Perhaps the messenger would under the service. The VICE-CHANCELLOR—YOU may take the order for service. During this motion Sir EDWARD SUGDEN observed that some most serious Acts were passed in August last, of which the profession had not the slightest intimation, and, amongt others, an Act enabling English trustees to commit a breach of trust by lending money on mortgages in Ireland. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, DEC. 13, REECE V. TAYLOR AND ANOTHER. This was an action for an assault and false imprisonment. The plaintiff, Mr. George Reece, was the son of the late Dr. Reece, who established the Egyptian Hall. The de fendant Taylor was a brother-in-law of the plaintiff, and executor of the late Dr. Reeoc's will, and the other de fendant was Mr. Wyburn, the Barrister, who had an in terest in the deceased's estate, which was insolvent, as trustee of some infant creditors. The plaintiff and a brother of his had been retained by the executors at a salary of 30/. per annum each, with their board and lodging, to manage the chemist and druggist business, left by their father at the Egyptian Hall ; but in consequence of some dissatisfaction of the defendant Taylor with tho plaintiff's accounts he was dismissed, but after some time he returned to the shop and insisted upon retaining possession of it as his. In June last the two defendants went to the shop to turn out the plaintiff, and after some squabbling and scuffling, in the course of which the defendant Taylor used very violent language, the plaintiff was given into the cus tody of a policeman, on a charge of assaulting Taylor, and taken to the police office at Marlborough -street. Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 50/. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DEC. 13. WOOD V. LANE AND CLAYTON. This was an action of trespass and false imprisonment. The plaintiff was a flannel-draper in Castle -street, Holborn. Clayton was a person in the same business, and Lane was an attorney's clerk. Wood and Clayton had had dealings together, and Wood became indebted to Clayton. On one occasion, when Wood was in the shop of a person named Saunders, in Holborn, Clayton came in and demanded the money that Wood owed him. Wood was not prepared at that moment to pay the debt, and requested Clayton to call at his house ; on which Clayton said, " Oh ! very well ; then I shall arrest you—l have an officer outside." Lane was then introduced, and affected to take him into custody. Lane represented himself as Selby, the sheriff's officer, and Clayton and Lane went away with the plaintiff in the direction of Chancery-lane. When they arrived at the plaintiff's house the plaintiff said be would send to Mr. Harmer, his attorney, when he discovered that there had been no arrest, for that Mr. Selby knew nothing of the matter. The Jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff— Damages, 10/. The Cur JUSTICE said that this ought to be a warning to the defendants. Had there been reglitatitie ; Mid bad death ensued, it would have been murder. COURT OF EXCHEQUER.—DEc. Is. GIDDEON V. DAWNES. hi tills ..!ase the action was brought to recover compen sation in damages for loss stistaipod by breach of con tract by the defendant. The plaintiff is a merchant, car rying on business at St. Helena, and the defendant the owner of a ship called the Meta, traling between London and that place. Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 201., costs 40s. LORD MAYOR'S COURT, DEC. 13. THE CITY OP LONDON AND (loon This was a claim for compensation under the Act of Parliament for forming the new street from Princes-street to Moorgate: The claimant was Mr. Good, a plumber, in Coleman -street, who sought compensation for his work shops in Great Bell-alley, and two small houses adjoining, which he held under lease for a term of thirty-six years, at 61/. 10s. per annum. A part he had underlet at rents amounting to 70/. ; another part was occupied by his clerk, and the residue was used in his own business. The original claim was as follows :—For lease, 8,103/. 10s. ; loss of trade, three years' profit on 1,400/, 4,2001. ; loss on stock, rent of temporary premises, &c., 1,2001, ; plant and fix tures, 7611.; total, 14,2641. 10s. ; but upon the trial the claimant's Counsel reduced the amount to 9,851/. The Jury returned a verdict--For the lease, 4,0201. ; fixtures, 4001. ; all other damage, 2,835/. ; total 7,255/. ANGLE V. THE CORPORATION OF LONDON. The plaintiff, who is a stable•keeper in Coleman-street, having been required to give up his premises for the pur pose of the new street now forming from London-bridge to Moorgate, claimed 2,217/. as compensation for his lease hold interest and the loss of his business. The corpora tion offered 1,000/. and the value of his fixtures, which was rejected, and a jury was therefore impannelled to assess the amount which the claimant was entitled to receive. Mr. Sergeant Andrew conducted Mr. Angle's case, and Mr. Follett appeared as the leader for the corporation ; when, after hearing several witnesses on each side, the Jury gave a verdict for 993/., including the fixtures, which had been estimated as of 43/. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MARLBORO UGH-STREET. At the evening sitting at this office two foreigners, foreigners, named Bernhardt Kehn and Rehstock Lemann, were brought before Mr. DYER, jun., from Vine-street station house, charged with robberies to a considerable amount. The prisoners were respectably dressed, and appeared to be between forty and fifty years of age. Kehn, who was the shorter of the two, wore spectacles. The prisoners, who appeared not to be able to speak a word of English, were spoken to by a Gentleman present in French, at the reqaest of the Magistrate, and informed of the nature of the charges against them. In answer to questions Kehn stated that he resided at the house of the head-waiter at Sabloniere's Hotel, No. 18, Leicester-square. Ballard and Mace, two of the officers of .this office, were ordered by Mr. Dyer to search their lodgings immediately, and they were remanded until Monday, when there is no doubt other charges will be brought against them. MAR YLEB ONE. A girl only twelve years old, named Illargart 2lforand, was charged with having robbed Mr. J. Shepherd, the jeweller, of No. 34, Mornington-place, Hampstead-road, of two gold watches, a gentleman's dressing case with silver fittings, three costly rings set with diamonds and emeralds, a pair of pearl bracelets, and other valuable articles. The juvenile offender was remanded. At the evening sitting John Molloy, John Powell, Win. Monk*, Samuel Hawley, John Smith, and Sarah Molloy were charged with having in their possession an immense quantity of counterfeit coin. The prisoners, who said they were " as innocent as suck ng children," were remanded for the attendance of Mr, Powell, Solicitor to the Mint. Daniel Dunn, alias Iliztrven, and Thomas Williams were this morning placed at the bar, charged with having a quantity of housebreaking implements in their possession. Sergeant Andrew Valance, No. 11 C, stated that he was on duty in Maddox-street during last night, and be tween three and four this morning he observed the two de fondants in company with another man. He looked at them attentively, and recognised Dunn as a man whom he had frequently seen in the company of reputed thieves. He wached them for a few minutes, but when they observed that they were objects of suspicion they separated. Valance followed, and meeting another constable, took them into custody. On searching the prisoners, a dark lantern, a bundle of skeleton keys, a crow-bar, a file, and in fact a most corn plete set of implements for housebreaking were found upon them. Dunn said he knew nothing of the " tools"--they were not found on him. Valance said he knew him as a reputed thief. Williams admitted having had the implements, but said epicked them up. _ Mr. DYER passed a deserved encomium on the Sergeant and committed the prisoners for three months each to the House of Correction. UNION BALL. James Todd, a man advanced in years, was charged with intermarrying with Jane Jones, his first wife being still alive. The second wife stated that she was married to the prisoner the 27th November, 1825, he having described him elf as a widower. In a few months, however, she was called upon by a woman who claimed the prisoner as her husband. Witness made no objection to resign her claim, but the prisoner refused to accede to the first wife's propo sition, and he remained with witness until the last five years. A short time ago the first wife died, and the pri soner, imagining that he had then a legal claim on witness as his second wife, went to her home and said he had come to take up his quarters there. She, however, repulsed him ; and it was in consequence of his threatening to sell off all her things that she had instituted this proceeding against him. The registers of the marriages were produced, anti the prisoner was remanded. THAMES POLICE. William Paine, a chandler's shopkeeper and corndealer, in Upper Ground-street, Blackfriars, and James Davis, a labourer, were on Saturday charged with stealing a large quantity of wood, lead, and other materials from a building formerly occupied by Mr. Knight, as a whiting manufac turer, in Upper Ground -street. Mr. Knight's premises it appeared had been unoccupied for four years, and at the be ginning of last week a great many men, women, and children commenced the work of demolition, which proceeded with great activity to the astonishment of the neighbourhood, waggons, carts, trucks, and wheelbarrows being brought in to requisition to remove the property. Mr. Lee, a limeburner adjoining, considered it necessary to make some inquiries, when he ascertained that Mr. Knight was in the King's Bench Prison, and that sheriffs' officers had been put in possession of the premises by the ground landlord. The solicitor of Mr. Tanner, the ground landlord, said the premises, which were extensive, had become dilapi dated, and notice of ejectment had been served on Mr. Knight, and sheriff's officers put in possession. A portion of the materials produced were fixtures belonging to Knight, or rather to his creditors ; the remainder was the property of the ground landlord. The demolition had been exten sively acted on, and damage to the amount of 8001. had been done. Pain, in defence, said he saw the gates open, and the people carrying away the property, and he merely followed the example of others, he believing it was not a crime. A sheriff's officer named Belton had given him permission to take away the property, and the new police, who were pre sent, did not attempt to prevent the people from carrying away what they pleased. Davis said he was a boat-builder, and all he obtained was a few pieces of wood. The nephew of Mr. Knight informed the Magistrate that his father sent him to the building. He told his uncle, Mr. Knight, who said that the people might do as they pleased. The case was ordered to stand over for further inquiry, as was the attendance of Belton, the sheriff's officer, the defendants entering into their own recognizances to appear next Saturday. In looking over the calendar of candidates in order to ascertain the points on which we can be useful, we find the following names which we earnestly recommend to the sup port of our brother Reformers :—For Poole, Byng and Tulk ; for Shaftesbury, Poniter ; for Lyme, Pinney ; for Bridport, Warburton and Rowilly ; for Weymouth, Buxton and Burdon ; for Frome, Shephard, if he can be pledged ; for Wells, Col bourne and Lee; for Bridgewater, Tynte and Tayleur ; for Taunton, Labouchere and Bainbridge ; for Tiverton, Heath cote and Kennedy—we hope the third candidate will be in duced to quit the field ; for West Somerset, Sanford and Tynte ; and for the Eastern Division, the venerable Langton. To the constituents who returned these gentlemen to Parlia ment we earnestly and confidently appeal. We shall not fear to refer to the votes they have given, for they have been honest and straightforward, and, in every instance, in favour of the rights and liLerties of the people. Our readers will observe that the lace trade in Chard is in a deplorable state, and we much regret to add, that the silk mills in this town, as well as in Bruton, Taunton, &c., are getting very short of work. Another fortnight's excitement, and we shall tremble to send forth the condition of our Western manufactories. Is this, we ask, a time for the country to be trifled with ?—Shcrborne Journal. beans to 18 24 20 :'2 21 26 30 31 20 30 23 26 20 21 45 1$ 2'2 25 nit the c-u Wheat. Barley . 495. Otl. 39s ed. . 46 0 3'i 0 ... 0 t 3 0 Average price of Wheat c - PRICES OF PROVISIONS, A per lb. Os. 4‘l. to 0.4. 6 i I resh Buller, Alittton 0 4 0 7 Salt Ditto.— Veal 0 0 0 9 Ditto, per cR t.» fib 0 0 4 0 ti Egga, per 0 0 per qr. 0 0 0 0 DatStraw(ltii 8 0 :8 0 Wheat Ditto...—. 7 6 Quartero -- 0 IS 0 Barley I l'fitatoea, 174111 -- 0 4 0 (1 Havoteritt.---- 0 8 First Second : . 21 3s. Id. EDINBURGH ME A I There was a middling imply of a rale, were ra her heavy. l'er Sack of Imp First Oatineal Second ditto I 9 0 Rarleymeal I 4 0 ... I 4 0 P‘d Barley—No. I , i rWI. ffg GLASGOW CORN Our Grain market has Wheat, per 2-101 b. s. ti. Lit British, old new ..... l9 0 2.2 0 Canada, free 2i 0 28 0 101111 Barley. per :32011) 0 t C geottisli M 0 21 1 0 Irish 11,Istone S . Austel!... rothnin Li , keard I.anner.ss on Camolford P.ma.lnce -I)tc. 10. , y, atid the stiles were ()at R. pe a .:. I flew' % 23s 6d 2, - .. 8. od . ! 295. N.. 20 0 26 0 , 26 0 13 6 24 oig4 0 C. ib 8 10 Ile. R ri 10 L MAKEr.—llec 2 nd th e /anneal R at this day's niar&e, - a Per Stone of 14Ib Imp. a First Oatmeal. • XII I 4 Second ditto (I 1 - Barleymeal c I ' Peasemeal . 1 1t" 12., —M. Its —4th, 104 --11,!_t_t,....-- MARKET.—Dec. 10. been steady this week. ,„ •.1 Vats, per IltS4lb. c I. i ; o Irish-- ........ .. ..... l5 6 to I B r iti s h IRO il i " Beans, pet 2rotb. 0 English -0 ..... Seettisli ! so P.ase, Scottish l6O ~ 0 4 iatmell, rer I.lolb Flour, per 213011 , 34 0 • CORNWALL MARKETS . .ulated at 24 gallons to the bushel.) Wheat. s d. to s. d. 0 17 9 0 18 0 0 20 0 0 19 0 0 19 6 0 19 6 17 0 19 0 17 6 19 0 d. toe d. e. d• `,) 0 11 0 0 i) 0 0 11 0 0 i ) —I 0 n n II 01— 0 fo —on 0 7 0 0 10- 0 11 01 7 0 7 6 0 11 6L 0 Barley. I OaJ~, MINING INTELLIGENCE. Tone. CWt• Si r Quantity of Cc.pper Or sold - 0 3,3 '" 0 Quantity of fine Copper llO 3 Average Produce Stk A i Amount of Sale, 2208 li.ios. &1--Average Sta n dard, 11(1. 316 '"' • MEETING OF CREDITORS AT THE COU BASINGHALL-STREET, TO-MORROW. (From the London Gazette.) G. Ward, hairdresser. Southampton T Cater, cl .th-f clot., Cate ton_street It. Clarke and J. Burgess, cnal.'altors, Coal Exclu.nge Taynton, law-stationer, coin's Inn B. T. Scar. jun , surgeon, Bishop's Sto: Von!, Hertfordshire .1. S•aig and J. Pou'san, marble masons, City-basin W. Poole and V. Thomson, victualler, Blackfriars-road ji OP if 2 f 9 if I 10 1 POPULATION OF THE KINGDOM OF POLANDI'; 1833.—(From a Petersbu rg h P a p er )—M a l e s, 2,002, 35 1 g. females, 2,035,543 ; total, 4,C37,925. Warsaw has a pol ) „, ij o b, Lion of, males, 63,212 ; f e males, 6 6,49 3 ; total, 1 29 ' 1 „ 1 1 , This is an increase of 4,837 since 1832. The female P°' of lation exceeds the male everywhere except in the provinces Plozk and Augustine. THE NEW PRUSSIAN CUSTOMHOUSE SYSTEM"."-' We copy from a German paper the following statistics relai tivo to the German Customhouse Union : The territory ° this union, comprehending the Grand Duchy of Baden, principality of Nassau, and the free city of Frankfort on —0( Main (that is to say, as it will be eomposed on the I s t ( January, 1835), extends in the direction from the North - PI - l e to West, from Memel (37 deg. long.) to Aix-la-Char o d (231 deg. long.) ; and from North to South, from Strals t ! h (54 deg. lat.) to the frontiers of Austria, below M tlii .: b c o (24 deg, lat.), and contains a superfices of nearly a , spare miles (German). The following, in round numb erg ' o ," tl e amount of the population of the countries which cotlir.,4 the Union :—Prussia, 13,200,000 inhabitants; 13avari o y, 4 A 00,00 0; Wurtemberg, 2,000,000 ; the kingdom of SO' by 1,:300,000 ; the Saxon Duchies, 600,000: the Grand Du e , of Baden, 1,100,000 ; the Prin c ip a lity o f Nassau, 3 50 ;e the Duchy of Hesse Cassel, 600,000 ; the Duchy of rt_ i , Darmstadt, 700,000 ; the Free City of Frankfort on the 3 34 00, 60,000 ; the other small States 590,000 :—Total, 24, 5°0 ' ° t he The following German States have not yet acceded to 00; union :—Austria, 10,000,000 inh a bit a nt s; Hanover, 1, 500 L 0 e t the Duchy of Brunswick, 250,000 ; the Duchy of Oldenu t f i 7, 230,000 ; the Grand Duchy of Mecklenburg, 500,00 0 L o o Duchies of Holstein and L a u n b urg , 400,000 ; the three 1 1 " .. Towns, 250,000.—T0ta1, 13,150,000. B IR TH S. At Larchhill, Moffat, on the Gth inst., the lady of Captain Cbarle° Hope, R.N., of a daughter. o f I , At Girvan, on the Bth instant, Mrs. Robert Ballantin e, daughter. On the 9th inst ,at Camden-place, Cork, the lady of 1 4°1111 Howe, Esq., of a son. Rob ert On the 4th inst., at Abbe Mahon House, the lady ° f thing' Deane Haye, Esq., of a son, who survived his birth but a sh ort of tho On the 2d inst., at Belmount, County Kerry, the 124 1 Rcv. o f a daughter. ob° • At Ancrum Manse, on the sth inst., the lady of the Rev' 1 Paton, of a son. Itenii On the 12th inst., at Dur an % Enfield, the lady of Captain " Connop, of a daughter. MARRIED. Aff' At Glasgow, on the 9th in s t., by th e R e v. Dr. Mitebell, ter o f David. Nish, Golspie, Sutherlandshire, to Williamina, &ug h the Rev. James Methven, Glasgow. gent' On the 4th inst., at Mary Church, Sherborne, by the Rer• f ter. Coleridge, S. S. S t riven, Esq., to C aro li ne , d a ughter of the R:chard Hume, Lancaster, rector of Warnford, Hants. hos* At Crowcombe, Thomas C. Buxton, Esq., of Wescombe - car efft Somerset, to Mary Ann, second daughter of George }l * Esq., of Crowcombe-court, in the same county. 00, At Prestbury, on the 4th inst., by the R e v. R. L. I° ri ge srl e6 Chaplain of Saint Philip's Church, Liverpool, William v a go' Townsend, M.A., of Queen's College, Barrister at Law, a c 5 l: ss(l4 corder of Macclesfield, to Fanny, daughter of Richard W ar : toe of Westbrook, and niece o f th e l a t e Ri g ht H o n. Sir Ch r ' Robinson. jobo On the 9th inst., at St. Peter's, Cork, by the Rev . tb Smyth, Rector of Tullegh Glebe, Robert Smyth, Esq., 1° c 1 , 3 0 ,14 late Richard Smyth, of E as t on H ouse , E sq ., Count,' ° Charlotte Anne, youngest daughter of Samuel Bleazby• the Mardyke. iter• At Royal Terrace, Edi n b urg h, on th e 9th i ns t., by the °f Chalmers, the R ev . J ames L ew i s , one o f th e ministers to Marion, second daughter of James Wyld, Esq., Gilstorl.looo, At Edinburgh, on the 10th i ns t., b y th e R ev . James rt° t he O te of Coldingham, R. B. Baird, E sq ., to H e l e n, daughter of S S taff-urgeon John Brown. indiestpir On the lt3th of March last, at Meerutt, in the Eas t-- the Rev. J. C. Proby, A.M., John Rose Holden Rose, , , tenant in the 11th Light Dragoons, and youngest sou o ._ ti ghte Rose, Esq. of Lansdown-place, Bath, to Emily Hall, eldest c ep ert , i' of Major J. N. Jackson, C. 8., and Deputy Quartermast er ' C. On the 11th inst., at Kensington Church, by the 11 ,7 a geole res h % don, Frederick, youngest son of John Mitchell, Esq. o' soi t Surrey, to Madelina Forbes, youngest daughter of IN• Esq., of Deerbolts Hall, Suffolk. DID. On the sth inst., aged 82, Mr. E Henry Edward House, ale combe, formerly Chamberlain of Bath. 0010 On the 9th inst., after a lingering illness, Mr. Thig n : 49. irony years landlord of the White Ball Inn, Tiverton, aft el , f.4' On the 3d inst., in the 83d year of his aof the JonatharL i sir P . of Accrington House, Lancashire, uncle the Right I " °° ' Peel, Bart. OotO e ' On the sth inst., after a few days' illness, at Killineuregorsp county of Westmeath, in his 52d year, Major General J. F. f oo led C. 8., only son of the late Hon. General James Murray' ' Governor of Quebec and Minorca. 00 .1 At 28, Bryanston-street, London, on the sth inst•' Pringle, Esq., author of " Sketches in South Africa," 46c* ° Wil l On the 13th inst., at his house in Fenchurch-st reet, ear Thwaytes, Esq., in his 88th year. On the 11th inst., at her residence in Exeter , in the 810 ieq. , of her ago, Mrs. Drewe, r e li c t o f the late John Rose Drevre , , of the Grange, in the county of Devon. after tee tie On the 14th inst., at his house at Kennington, th ~afie. illness, William Holmer, Esq., in his 78th year. On the 14th inst., of scarlet fever, Charles, eldest son oiforeight Robert Cockerel', Esq., of Eaton-square, aged five rail Otild err months. l'ala vol f the On the lltk inst., in the 37th year of his age, -- 1 on Esq., of Glanwilliam, 'Merionethshire, third surviviPg • late Sir Charles Oakley, Bart. O' 'lb'plib Pci ' On the Bth inst., Maria, seventh daughter of Chas. _ T. On the 13th inst., Mrs. Niblock, the wife of the Bev* lock, of Clay Hill Park, Walthamstow, Essex, aged 59" UP lth London : Printed and Published by MU DO at The Sun Office, No. 112, Strand. MARKET INTELLIGENCE. COUNTRY CORN MARKETS DURING LAST WE 4. hest Barley. i Oats. Bean,. Pease ........----• .......... - ---- p er g naps : .. r. S. to a. s. to 8. s. to s. s. Cat lisle. ../ _ .4 25 19 40 —* 5 1-I.•x [1ain...v....v..... :34 ~...- 9 7 :12 22 23 34 ‘l.,meth .. . 02 40 ?t 99 10 23 32 36 31 penrith —.._. —4; 27 , 21 38 i -. 9 Sli nicht ... ~ 45 34 ..... 23 40 Winchester ........... 35 47 30 34 10 9,2 42 44 —. d. Per 119shel. s. d. s.d ....1 rot s. d. s. 6. s. n. 11 . 4 611 0 0 C trinartheti.......... 5 6 60 3 6 4 0 1 4 2 2 0 0 8. II to S. ‘; I 0 0 0 0 C •übridge 60 01' s 0 o.r 2.i 0 0 5 0 6( ORG 0 0 0 Newcastle (Stafl.) 8n 89 40 56 3 0 34 50 A „ A (IQ Nirthallerton —. 7 0 9 3 3 6 4613 :3 4 6 5 6 6( „" N 0 0 Stytte....... . 00 30 40 4 £11,3 0 :34 60 67 „";; 00 Swansea —........... 66 69 36 3, - .9 24 2R 00 06 , s u n " 00 WArwittk .—............ S 0 9 0 3 0 461 2 0 3 3 5 6 6 0 u v l'er Poll. n 0 0 ,1 , Barnardeastle —..... 1 12 0 140 80 86. 5 0 60 86 100 .' A (10 Durham --.....1 9 0 12 0 7 0 8 0 4 9 5 1., 7 3 9 0 1 2 ;", 0 f aki n , ~,,, d __,,,, llO In 6 146 90150 64 86 90 u" (it , 4e0c1e0n—............. In o 19. 0 8 8 SI ni 441 40 80 8C 0 0 _....-- WAKEFIELD CORN MARKET.—Dec. 12 Wheat, Bed, Norfolk and Sittll,ll, — a. 445. to 4.5. One AIL ---- lAP. and Cam. —a. 425. to 475. fine b 0• Yorkshire —.. 4.5. to 4es. fine BS. VPI.• l ... —B. 475. to s?e. fine 5 6 % Foreign, lted White —a. 40s. to 508 .me 56'' WAKEFIELD CORN MARKET.-Dec. 12 Wheat, tied, Norfolk and Slitll,lk -8. 445. to Vs. fine Ma* Lir. and Cam. -8. 425. to 475. fine 50 1 . - Yorkshire -.. 4.5. to 4es. fine 19 4 . - ViA..... ~.. - Foreign, hed White -s. 4ns. to 50s one 56 '' Barley, Norfolk and Sunni ..... 275. to 30s. fine 3 28. - Lincolnshire - Yorkshire Wold - Foreign Bean., Old -s. to -s. fine - -4 378 to 395. fine 43° ' -- New ... 355. to 38s. fine 421 Oats, Potato l9s, to 228. fine 24 --- Poland -s. 17x. to 19s. fine t'lL - Friesland and Small . -s. l6s to 18s. fine 201. -- dealing shelling Nlalt Rapesveil 23, ( 1. 15 53.0 . 14 0. . 1 . 1 1 . 7 71 4 . 20%. perp p er lc:: sco RKETS Wheat. • Aberdeen Berwick Coldstreinn Cie i nr (Fife' Dunttee Elgin Inverness Kelp , kaldy ..... Pe . th 41) to 51 `..'6 29 55 42 45 56 50 6( 40 511 40 4 43 C. t of the me 21 to 2; 18 21 IS 19 26 31 30 33 24 26 25 26 18 CO 23 29 ~I 26 ,asum Y4ri 19 to 22 15 18 13 N 18 22 20 25 16 '2O 16 19 is 17 16 21 , 20 22 ies through, . . . .- .. . -- , - _ 19 - 41 43 fry it," The riz. We had a large ra' her heavy. DTNBURG m supply of 11 CORN • all kinds d A b...! ET Grain tu. 74 1 2 10 n 9 n 7 0 0 10 'CH M itatley, ep illii P PIE tv,— ir the , er th r n ),, e k ly o'cl( , t Will 3 le ti ons 4 1 :tred fr c nt 610'!14ent ° th ptl ot 1 e /la h itl,:r l°tti°; : n - t t Sa r « . a<