The Sun. — London, England, 1834-09-05 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. " The Lord Chancellor's conduct during the dis cussion and the passing of the Bankrupts' 1111, ought to have silenced his calumniators for ever. He al lowed the Judges of Assize to nominate all the Coun try Commissioners of Bankrupts—those Commissioners no - bad prize to an intriguing, minister, being no less than 600 in number—with salaries from 2001. to 600/. per annum each ; and he referred the choice of the ‘fficial assignees to a Court of the principal merchants in the City of London ; thus entirely divesting him self of the patronage which had afforded such a fertile theme of obloquy. It is the fate of ever . zi real Re former to encounter imputations on the purity of his motives; but experience ought to have taught a man like Lord Brougham to disregard them ; es pecially as no one is better qualified to strip from Jac tzon and selfishness the hypocritical mask under which they would disguise their object and their origin. The whole gravamen of the charge against Lord Brougham is, that he is relieving the poor of England from the miseries of costly law and often unattainable justice." Perhaps our readers will scarcely believe, in perusing the above observations, that they are the genuine sen timents and sober advice of the obscure private gentle man in Printing-house-square, the " redacteur en chef" of the " leading journal " of Europe, on the Bth of July, 1833. " Shew me thy faith by thy works "—illustrate thy principles by thy practice, is a scriptural axiom, and we fearlessly ask whether or not the facts here recorded can be disproved —or on what foundation the Times now supposes that Lord Brougham is not still actuated by honourable and elevated motives ? Till some thing more than insinuations of being a betrayer, a slanderer, &c., be adduced—we ask whether " expe rience" ought not to teach Lord Brougham, as he is directed, to disregard the imputations of his " affec tionate" friend, who for fifteen years has striven to maintain and extend his Lordship's influence through out all classes of society ? What is, we repeat, the " gravamen" of the insinuations, for they are only in sinuations, against the Chancellor, by his quondam pitron, and which caused the " diabolical" article of the 16th August ? Truly, a supposition, upon the assurance of a correspondent, that Lord Brougham had, through the columns of the Caledonian Mer leury, paid a tribute of unconscious veneration for the conductors of the Times journal, accusing them Of wanting to be no less than Prime Mi nisters of Britain. But the Caledonian Me • cury has altogether denied the imputation, though the Times has not had the candour or generosity to acknowledge this ; and while it fills its columns with extracts. from the Albion, Standard, Parson Gleig's Gazette, and even Cobbett,—papers certainly very much in accordance with the sentiments of the Times—altogether omits those of the leading liberal journals, whose manly defence of the Chancellor would at any other period have obtained ready access to its columns. But, to use the redacteur 's own words, when, on another occasion, speaking—on the 18th June, 1833—0 f Lord Brougham's triumph over Lord Lyndhurst—" How delightful to see this triumph of reason over party" T. We shall content ourselves with one more extract from the Times, which we would advise the conductors of that journal to " read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest." January 2, 1833, upon a report that on the failure of the Tories to break the peace of the continent, they meant to break up the Reform Government,byfabricating divisions between its most distinguished Members !—" The organs of daily and weekly slander have been circulating the nonsen sical hopes of their patrons. We venture to predict that the leaders of the ousted faction will take smart money,'—[in despite of the adulation of the Tory press. The Times, it is pretty well known, is already paying the smart' in the diminished circulation of the paper. We will not venture to state the deprecia tion ; but the stamp duty will, we confidently assert, prove it] —and enlist under the banners of Lord Grey, before Lord Brougham will swerve one jot from the principles he has professed since his entry into public life, or from the pledges of judicial and other practi cal reforms on which he has more recently staked hiv future appreciation with the country. How must so lynx-eyed and clear-headed a man as the Lord Chan cellor smile at the adulation of the infatuated Tories." —Morning Chronicle. The loquacity of last Session, which nothing could check until the Usher of the Black Rod, like a good genius, struck his magical wand at the door, and com manded the novelty of silence within its porches—the loquacity of last Session has left a deep impression on the public mind, and the question now uppermost in almost every man's mouth is—" How can the evil of eternal clack be prevented in future ?" We are not for extreme, or, what some persons would call, bold measures in this case. 'We do not, for instance, see What advantage would be gained by imposing restric tions on the free agency of our Representatives, which would be the consequence of submitting all motions to a previous scruti n y b y any C omm i ttee, however chosen. The plan might save us many an absurd and mis chievous motion it is true, but then it might intercept some useful ones, and in time might degenerate into an instrument of despotism, for the suppression of wholesome and necessary reforms. The remedy would, therefore, be worse than the disease. In fact, it smacks too-:much of the old tyranny of licensing the Press to find mai advocates in a country where any preliminary tampering with men's opinions and conduct is viewed with a becoming jealousy. Besides, it is not merely motions we want to get rid of, but talk, and the talk of which we complain does not necessarily presuppose a motion, or a subject, or even an idea of any kind ; it is a stream that will continue to run, if it be not checked by some interposition of man, or of Provi- Bence, whether it run to any purpose or not. How often have we known a long discussion to end in the discovery that there was no question before the House? Indeed, the circumstance of having a specified ques tion before them would seem to be an impediment to some of our Parliamentary orators, who are never so much inclined to talk as when they have nothing to say. For these reasons we think it would be vain to expect that the mere act of limiting the number of mo tions—and that is often all the practical result contem- plated in the plan of a licensing Committee—•would have the effect of limiting the number of speeches. The want of matter is no limitation, but the contrary. Can we suppose that the want or the restriction of mo tions would be attended with better success ? There is one consideration, however, which would seem to point . . .._ out a method of getting over some part of the difficulty. It is obvious that the unprepared manner in which Ministers contrive—at least they have so contrived of late years—to meet Parliament at the commencement of every Session has afforded opportunity and encou ragement to the mere babblers for the exercise of their vocation. If Ministers came prepared with well- digested plans, if they came pre - pared to commence the business of the Session at once, not the mere tech- nieal routine business, but those important measures which the circumstances of the country call for, it is impossible to suppose that impertinence or folly would be permitted to interfere with the substantial demands of legislation. A recurrence to the Parliamentary history of the last Session would prove that much of the talk arose out of the delay of expected measures, and that even some of the idle motions for the assertion of abstract propositions which could lead to no result had the same origin. The cure for so much of the evil as can be traced to this cause would be, as we have already intimated, to begin in time, and not to postpone important motions until the House and the country are wearied with listening to speeches that mean nothing but mere sound, and lead to nothing but an unseasonable and unwholesome sleep in the side galleries. But something should also be done by the constituent bodies themselves. Members have at pre sent an idea that their constituents expect them nolens volens to hold forth in Parliament. It would be well to disabuse them of this idea—to let them know that the vote is, after all, the great test of their opinions, about which their constituents and the public at large are most anxious ; and it would be well if this were followed up by making the Representative accountable for any interruption to the public business which mere vanity or mere loquacity might induce him to commit. This may, perhaps, be too much to expect in the present state of informatio n ; but we are coming fast to that state of things in which a silent Member will not only be a rare but an envi a bl e acqu i s i t i on . Let us hope, however, that something may be expected from the forbearance of Members themselves. They should surely have some consideration for a public whom they have so bespeechified that the very name of debate is enough to set them yawning. Speech is, said to be a gift. It may be so to those who exercise it, but not to those upon whom it has been ex ercised in the unmerciful manner which the remem brance of the last session has impressed upon a wea ried, exhausted, perplexed, and absolutely stupified population.—itiorning Herald. Mr. Marshall, the agent to the Emigration Com mittee, feeling his occupation endangered by the me lancholy statements which we have recently published on the subject of female emigration to Australia, has put forth a pamphlet, which pretends to refute, but which in reality confirms and substantiates, them. The pamphlet consists of Mr. Marshall's letter to our selves, dated the 7th of August, on which we ventured to make a few comments on the 14th and 28th of the same month—of a letter of Mr. Henty, an ex-banker, respecting Van Diemen's Land, to which our informa tion does not extend, and our remarks did not apply— of two articles of news which appeared in the Times of the 2d of May, and in the Morning Herald of the 11 th of July, relating to the equipments of the Strathfieldsay and the David Scott, and which, if not written under the infpection of Mr. Marshall, were beyond all doubt written upon information furnished by that gentleman—and a few remarks of Mr. Marshall himself, now published for the first time, upon a leading article of ours on the 28th ult. After calling that article a virulent misrepresentation, to which he trusts that his first letter has given a satis factory reply, will it be believed that he meets the charge preferred against the superintendent of the Bus sorah Merchant by two of the female emigrants, not with a direct denial, but with the stale trick so often employed to palliate and screen oppression,—we mean a high-sounding eulogy upon the general kindhearted ness and respectability of the alleged oppressor ? Will it be believed that, after expressing great indignation at our assertion that " that superintendent remains in the colony a sort of barker to the Emigration Com mittee," he is, in the very next sentence, so uncon scious of the import of his own words, as to write that " beyond receiving his reports not the slightest con nexion exists" between him and that committee ? Will it be believed that Mr. Marshall can be guilty of the folly of accusing us of " assailing the Emigration Committee by assertion where facts fail," when he himself admits that the committee " have had occa sion to regret their selection of the person who accompanied the females by the Layton, and to be much dissatisfied with the manner in which he performed the duties to which the, appointed him ?" And yet of this person s miscon duct not a syllable would have been whispered to the world by Mr. Marshall and his committee, had we been backward in stating the complaints which reached us ; on the contrary, in his first letter Mr. Marshall availed himself of the testimony of this man —whom he now gives up—to contradict the state ments which we had received from a gentleman of re spectability and character. It is tedious, and nothing but the necessity of vindicating the truth would compel us, to repeat the assertion that the supply of water and provisions was as scanty on board the Lay ton as it is alleged in the letters we published to have been on board the Bussorah Merchant. Even on Mr. Marshall's own showing, the female emigrants on their voyage had only 176 ounces of solid food allowed them per week—a quantity which is con siderably less than that allowed to the female convicts at Hobart -town, who, according to the information obtained by Mr. Chadwick from the Colonial-office as a check upon the dietary of our workhouses, have 220 ounces of solid food furnished them in the same time. Mr. Marshall is not content with defending the conduct of himself and his committee with regard to the female emigrants sent out by the Bussorah Mer chant and the Layton—he also volunteers the defence of those who chartered the Princess Royal and the Red Rover. He tells us that the Emigration Com mittee " have received information that the young women who went out by those two vessels, much as their selection has been complained of, were generally successful in the Colonies." This may be true or not —we believe it to be untrue ; but how does Mr. Mar shall reconcile it with the following passage in his first letter ?—" With the Princess Royal and Red Rover the Emigration Committee have had nothing to do ; they were sent out from two to three years ago, and it teas in consequence of the complaints sent home of the description of persons who proceeded by those two vessels, and the indiscriminate manner an which fe male emigration had been previously conducted, that the Colonial Department, during the time Lord Goderich presided over it, arranged to vest the se lection of ,fit and proper women in a committee, tvith a view of ,preventing the great abuses previously complained gf.' Now we cannot allow Mr. Mar shall to blow hot and cold in the same breath, and therefore we ask him by which of these averments does he mean to stand—by that proceeding from the Go vernment, or by that proceeding from the Emigration Committee ? If lie adopts the former, which is Per haps necessary to bolster up the existence of the Emi gration Committee, then lie must reject the testimony of his volunteer associate, Mr. Henty, of which be re cently has become so proud ; but if he adopts the la ter, and thinks the testimony of Mr. Henty, the ex banker of Worthing, better than all the other testimony received by the Government from the southern colonies, then he cuts away the necessity for any expensive en couragement of female emigration under the auspices of the Colonial Department, for he shows that it can be as successfully prosecuted by private speculation as it can by all the multifarious arrangements of a com mittee and agent in London. In either case, we wish him joy of the dilemma in which he has involved his friends. Mr. Henty or the committee, or more probably both, must be damaged not a little by Mr. Marshall's unfortunate forgetfulness of what he has already written. But Mr. Marshall not only forgets what he writes, but he also forgets what 11:2 reads while he is writing. " The Times," lie says, " refers to a work by the Rev. Mr. Carmichael, and states that I quote it as a work of authority. I have never seen it." It is very strange, then, that Mr. Marshall should quote in his letter an extract of more than a dozen lines from the 38th page of that work, which is now open before us. But Mr, Marshall goes on—" The work to which I referred was the New South IVales Calender and Directory, published at Sydney some time after [mark the date) the two ships sent out last year had arrived." Softly and fairly Mr. Marshall : this was not all that you said ; your words were these,—" I would refer you to the New South Wales Calendar and Directory for this year, a work now in extensive circula tion, and of considerable authority. It is there stated in an article called" —what ? " Hints to Emi grants?" Impossible ! No, not quite impossible, for there it stands in black and white, " Hints to Emi grants." But Mr. Marshall has not yet done flounder ing from bad to worse. "Ifl do not mistake,—l am not sure this moment on the point, but I am strongly persuaded of it,—Mr. Carmichael's work existed be fore either of the ships sent last year had arrived out, and has reference to emigration as previously conducted. If I am right in - this impression, the extract from th e same work, with which the editor of the Times closes his article of the 28th ult., and relies so much upon that he gives it in order that it may more effectually contribute to his object in italics, was also published before the Emigration Committee sent out a single ship--_b fore, infict, they had any ex istence at alt. It is perfectly obvious, therefore, that all which Mr. Carmichael wrote, and which the Times seizes upon with such avidity to bend to its purpose, had reference to the abuses in conducting emigration before the emigration committee was originated, and for the correction of tvhich abuses they were expressly constituted." N ow we request of our readers to peruse this paragraph at least twice over—to consider the ob scure cunning with which it decries the authority of Mr. Carmichael's book as applying to existing circum stances,—to reflect upon the aitful malignity with which it charges us with falsifying dates, and garbling quota ions to serve our own purposes,—and, above all, the deli beratc and crafty suppression of the quotation which we made, and which we again produce, to destroy this hateful tissue of what not even charity itself can denominate unintentional falsehood. The words of Mr. Car- michael, who is the author of the " Hints to Emi grants," in the New South Wales Calendar of this year, are these :—" It is much to be regretted that accounts regarding the state of things in this colony had reached England of such a character as to autho rise"--whom? "the Emigration Committee at Home to publish statements calculated very seriously to mis lead a large class ofthe industrious population of Great Britain." But we need not reprint the rest of the extract. 'We have given enough to prove what Mr. Marshall can do when he sits down with malice pre pense. to misrepresent and pervert written documents. "If I do not mistake !" Mr. Marshall made no mistake here. He knows he did not. He had the extract before his eyes. The Emigration Committee at home was expressly named in it ; and yet, to de ceive his readers, he omits the extract altogether, and unblushingly declares that the book was published " before the Emigration Committ ee h a d any ex i s t ence at all." We cannot help asking, " What next ?" Times. Since the above article was written, we have re ceived another letter from Mr. Marshall, in which he —the writer of the paragraph on which we have just commented—calls upon us to have some regard to that truth which we have just shown how highly he venerates. We published his letter on Tuesday, from which it will be seen that he denies Mr. Wal kinshaw's statement that the expense to the Colonial Department of sending out the female emigrants by the David Scott amounted to 6,0001. Now we are not surprised at Mr. Walkinshaw falling into this error, if it be one, for we find it stated in the article from the Morning Herald of the 11th of July, which Mr. Marshall has republished in his pamphlet, and which he lauds in the highest terms as the result qf close observation and personal inquiry on board, that " the David Scott, which is capable of carrying 1,000 tons, is the largest ship yet sent out with emigrants. The expense of this outfit to Government will exceed 6,0001." Now, if this statement be untrue, why did Mr. Marshall republish it in his pamphlet without contradiction ? Was it that he was afraid that by cast ing doubt upon one part of that elaborate eulogy upon his instructions—which by a strange coincidence of language in the writers of the Times and Herald are described in both as "forming an excellent institute upon which a code of regulations may be based"—he should also be throwing doubt upon the whole ? The statement, however, was not given upon our authority, but on that of a letter addressed to us by Mr. Wal kinshaw. Mr. Marshall says, that in stating that the David Scott is a second rate ship we " doubtless mean" to insinuate something as to her unfitness for the service upon which she has gone. Had we thought her unfit for such service, we would have stated so in direct terms ; but we had no idea of the kind, for we had seen her seaworthiness fully admitted in Mr. Wal kinshaw's pamphlet ; and as a proof that we have no wish to state anything but truth respecting Mr. Mar shall, we readily give him the benefit of Mr. Walkin shaw's testimony. But the fact is, that a reference to Lloyd's Register Book will show that the David Scott is in the second class of ships, and 20 years old. What, then, has Mr. Marshall to complain of?--Times. BANKRUPTCY COURT.-SEPT. 4. (Before Commissioner WILLIAMS.) THOMAS DEAN ALDERSON'S BANKRUPTCY. In this case the bankrupt was a mQrchant carrying on an extensive business in pewter and lead, and the fiat was issued against him some time ago. To-day was appointed for the creditors to meet in order to prove their claims, and to make a declaration of the first dividend on the estate. The Court was applied to enter a claim for 1,0001., part of a legacy left to Mr. George Douglas Alderson, by his father, Sir George Alderson. Mr. Thrupp, the assignees' solicitor, opposed the claim being made, and wished to know the consideration given for the bond upon which the proof was now sought to be made. The Solicitor, on the part of the claimant, said that the legacy was left by Sir George Alderson to Mr. George Alderson of 2,000/., and the bankrupt was appointed one of the executors. One half of this sum had been paid, and a bond had been given for the other half, and the claim was made on this bond. There were assets to provide for the claim, it being admitted by the bankrupt that he had re ceived sufficient out of the estate to pay the 2,000/., there being, besides the personal estate, a freehold estate. The claim was then entered. Mr. Thrupp before the next meeting should require ac counts from the bankrupt respecting certain property it was alleged he held in his possession. The bankrupt's solicitor replied that his client had not possession of any property belonging to the estate ; if he bad, an action might be brought against him for it. The Commissioner said the only action he could agree to would be to have a diligent investigation in that Court. A day was then named for the private investigation into matters important to the estate. The amount of proofs is about 15,2001., and the claims about 6,300/. A dividend of four shillings in the pound was declared, it being stated by the assignee, Mr. Clark, that 1,7001. had been set aside to meet the expenses of law proceedings which might be entered into. Further proceedings were then adjourned. THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 1834 POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION -HOUSE. Alexander Ripion, a hair-dresser, was charged under the following circumstances : J. Maunders, a meagre -looking object, who acknowledged that he " yarned" a livelihood by gagging in public-houses, stated that he went the night before into a house of call for tailors in Bishopsgate, and sat down to enjoy his pipe. The defendant began to annoy the gentleman present very much by telling lies about the many men, and ladies too, of high rank whom he had taken by the nose, and he (com plainant) endeavoured quietly to prevent any further of fence, an attempt which was resented by a blow on the top of the nose. The defendant said that the complainant had thought proper to play off one of his professional tricks upon one who knew nothing about him, while he (defendant) was telling the company that he had just been out of compliment to the family to shave a deceased friend ; that complainant then said he heard a dog growl and bark under his chair ; and as at the same time something touched his leg, he jumped up to avoid a bite, but he could see no dog, and his distress seemed to cause a great deal of amusement in the room. About a quarter of an hour afterwards he heard, he could have taken his oath, two cats fighting under the same chair, and up he started a second time, but the company burst out a laughing, and to his surprise he could not see any animal whatever. At last a friend of his whispered to him that the complainant made all the noise with his belly. Of this he (defendant) was soon convinced, for upon hearing a pig grunt under his chair he turned the grunt suddenly into a roar, accompanied with a great variety of oaths and curses, by giving the complainant a dab in the face. The complainant said that it was customary to try skill upon somebody who was a stranger, and althongh he had made experiments upon hundreds he never caused anything but good humour before. In this instance the defendant was such a bore with his long stories about the nobility he had shaved, that the company tipped the wink to bark or grunt him out of them. Defendant—l never shaved a nobleman in my life, and I never said so. Complainant—You said you shaved a Duchess the night before the last drawing-room.—(Laughter.) Defendant—Never, my Lord. I said I shaved a Duke's bitch. She was an old poodle, a long time in the family, and I shaved her hind quarters ; but, by the virtue of my oath, I never shaved a Duchess yet.---(Great laughter.) The LORD MAYOR said the complainant ought, before he had played off a practical joke, to have ascertained the temper of his customers. If a man imitated dogs and pigs so well he must expect sometimes to be treated as men often treated such intruder s . —(A laugh.) Defendant—This man is w e l known, please your Lord ship. He was had before a Magistrate of Rumford Market for playing off the kitten-rig. Complainant—lt wasn't me. It was a man that pre tended to be me. I never was there in my life. Defendant—You was. I'll tell you how it was, my Lord. He brought up a kitten, and he drawed her teeth eut to prevent her mewing, and so gets he three quart pots and lie claps 'em on the table, and says he, " I'll go a shilling nobody tells me which pot the kitten's under." Well, the people listens for to hear the little cat, but she was too well up to it to say a word. At last a mew came from one of the pots. " I'll bet upon this pot," says a countryman, and he put down a crown upon the pot. " Done," says the rigger, and he whips up the pot, and sure enough there was not cat there—(Laughter.) There was an Irishman pre sent, that swore the cat was spirited away, for he saw her tail sticking out of the pot that was just lifted ; but they all examined the vessel, and the devil a cat's hair was to be seen in it. The LORD MAYOR thought that the complainant was wasting his time at the Mansion-House, when he ought to be at Bartholomew Fair, where he might doubtless be much more profitably employed, and where he might show off his talents,in opposition to the menagerie, without running th fD hazard of getting a broken nose. MARLBORO UGH- S TREE T. At twelve o'clock, yesterday, Mr. Thomas Duncombe, the Hon. Member for Finsbury, accompanied by the Mar quis of Worcester, entered the office, and were accommo dated with seats at the table of the magistrates. It was soon ascertained that the Hon. Member's attendance was occasioned by a warrant being obtained against him by J. Fraser, Esq., of 215, Regent-street, for challenging the complainant to fight a duel. At one o'clock Mr. DYER arrived, on which the parties were ushered into the private room ; Mr. Duncombe and his friends, the Marquis of Worcester and Thomas Crosby, Esq., being accommodated with seats. On the clerk coming in, Mr. DYER said to the Hon. Member, " Mr. Duncombe, I suppose you are aware what you are here for ?" Mr. Duncombe (removing his eye from the newspaper)—Oh yes, Sir. Mr. DYER-It will be my duty, on Mr. Fraser swearing to the facts contained in his information, to hold you to bail to prevent a breach of the peace. The information of Mr. Fraser was then read. Mr. DYER-Mr. Duncombe, from your situation in life, I must call on you to enter into bail, yourself in the sum of 500/., and two securities in 2.50/. each, to keep the peace towards Mr. Fraser: are you contented? Mr. Dun combe—Yes. Mr. DYER—Then it will not be necessary to hear the provocation which gave rise to this proceeding. The Marquis of Worcester and Thomas Crosby, Esq. then entered into the required security for the appearance of Mr. Duncombe at the next Middlesex Sessions, to answer any complaint which might be preferred against him. On Mr. Duncombe entering into his own recognizance, the clerk asked him if he was content ? Mr. Duncombe— Yes. The Hon. Member then paid ss. for the recognizances and the parties left the office. The following is a copy of Mr. Duneombe's letter to Mr. Fraser : " 13, Arlington -street, Sept. 3, 1834. " Sir,—Having this moment read a most false and atrocious attack upon both my public as well as my private character in your Magazine for the present month, I call upon you either to give a contradiction to it, as full, as explicit, and as public as the calumnies which you have been the means of disseminating, or else that satisfaction which one gentleman has a right to demand from another, who has so unwarrantably and falsely maligned him. _ _ " My friend, Lord Allen, will deliver this into your hands, and receive your reply..-_.I am, Sir, your obedient servant, 6 THOMAS S. DUNCOIIIIE. " To J. Fraser, Esq." The following is Lord Allen's account of his interview with Mr. Fraser ; " Mr. Duncombe having asked me to be the be a r er o f a l e tt er to Mr. Fraser, and to receive an answer to it, I had this day an interview with him at his house in Regent-street, and de livered it to him. Having read it, he declared that he could give no answer to it ; but, upon my pressing him for one, he said that the letter contained .a challenge, that he by no means approved of hostile meetings, and that he should, immediately apply to a Magistrate for a warrant against Mr. Duncombe and bin(; him over to keep the peace. He acknowledged that he was the proprietor of Fraser's Magazine, which contained an article traducing Mr. Duncombe's character, and that ho would have declined giving the name of the author had he been applied to for it. Mount-street, Sept. 3, 1834. " ALLEN." QUEEN-SQUARE. NOVEL METHOD OF TAKING POSSESSION.—Mr. J. Featherston, of the Southwark Bridge-road, was charged with malicously damaging an iron railing on the premises of Mr. Davis, situated at the corner of Blackfriars-road and Boundary-row. There was a very small piece of ground attached to Mr. Davis's premises, which was enclosed by an iron railing, and the defendant in broad day was seen in the act of breaking it down. Several rails were broken before he was given into the custody of the police. The Magistrates asked the defendant what he had to say to the charge of breaking down the iron fence ? The defendant considered that by right the piece of ground belonged to him. Some years ago the whole pro perty belonged to his brother, who owed him a sum of mon ey, which he never received, and he claimed the piece of ground in lieu of the debt owing to him. The Magistrates asked what was the amount of damage done, and were informed about 20s. The. Magistrates considered it to be a most extraordinary proceeding, and ordered him to pay 20s. for the damage, and a further sum of 20s. for the wilful damage. TEN SHILLINGS' WORTH OF LAW.—DOWNES v. SEY MOUR.—Mrs. Dowries, a respectable married female, charged Mrs. Seymour, another respectable married female, on a warrant, with violently assaulting her under the following circumstances : Both parties are neighbours, and live at Lodge's place, Chelsea. It appeared from the evidence of Mrs. Downes that a few days ago some quarrel arose between her and her friend Mrs. Seymour, when the latter abused her in a most violent manner, and called her some dreadful names which no respectable female, like herself, could bear to hear. Here Mrs. Downes mentioned the elegant language used by the defendant, but, notwithstanding, she was interrupted by the Magistrates, she was determined that they should hear every word, which would have disgraced even Bil lingsgate. MG. GREGORIE said it was certainly very elegant ; there was not the slightest occasion to repeat it, and begged of her to come to the point. Mrs. Downes continued, and said that notwithstanding she bore the abuse with the greatest patience, Mrs. Sey mour was not content, but took up a bucket of soap-suds and soused her all over, upon which she took up a little dirt and threw it at her, which was the cause of all the row that followed. Mrs. Seymour, who appeared very anxious to get a word in, commenced her defence by assuring the Bench that she was a respectable married female as well as Mrs Downes, and could bring hundreds to speak to her character as well as Mrs. Downes, who gave the first provocation by throw ing a quantity of filthy stinking mud all over her, spoiling her dress, and also a large piece of butter which was on a plate close by ; and a quantity of other " wittels" were also damaged. Then it was that she soused her with the soap suds. As to Mrs. Downe's language to her it was hor rible ; she called her a -, Mr. GILEGOUIE—There that will do ; we do not want to hear it • we have had enough of respectable language. N otwithstanding this interdiction Mrs. Seymour would not be denied, and out with it all, and which was the worst language used by the two respectable married females it would be hard to decide. Mr. GREGORIE—Very elegant language for respectable married females, truly. A host of witnesses were called on both sides, from whose evidence it.would be very difficult to decide which was the worst, or which was in possession of the most elegant Bil lingsgate tongue. The Magistrates at length said that they could hardly say which was most to blame. The plaintiff, however, had paid ss. for the warrant ; they would therefore fine the defendant ss. to the King ; exactly 10s. worth of law between them. Both parties left the office much dissatisfied. Henry Charles Adell, a young man, was brought before Mr. WHITE by a police constable of the B division, charged with sleeping in an empty cask covered over with straw in William-street, Knightsbridge, and having no home to go to. The defendant, in the account lie gave of himself, said that he came from Taunton, in Somersetshire. He had an uncle who was Colonel of Dragoons, and he had come up to town to see him in order to get into the army, but on his arrival he found that he was abroad, and that had rendered him quite destitute. He was committed for fourteen days to the House o Correction. MARYLE B ONE. B, ? isc A o u e Tto a s yo T u o ng T rn A a V n ER g N-K ER ente ElP y s.—liest dressed, but Rob t da of at meagre • aspect, who stated himself to have been in the law, was placed at the bar before the sitting Magistrate, Mr. Hos- KINS, charged as follows : The prisoner, on the previous afternoon, entered the Fitzroy hotel and tavern, kept by Mr. Hudson, Charlotte street, Fitzroy-square, and ordered dinner, which, consist ing of some choice viands, was immediately served up to him. Having made a sumptuous repast he sat sipping his grog till the evening was far advanced, when he asked the waiter if he could be accommodated with a bed, to which the latter answered in the negative, adding that their beds were all full ; the prisoner then with the utmost noncha lance declared his inability to pay for what he had had, upon which a policeman was obtained, and the prisoner conveyed vi et anni.9 to the station-house, on the road to which place Ise swore "he would not starve while there was an English or French hotel in London." The prisoner, in reply, did not mean to cheat Mr. Hud son ; quite different ; had he slept there he should have tshenetinfoornayofsrtiiinlNidquu ini odrdred i him t a l t i ee e t m i o e rn d i e n b g t ,. who would have given him Mr. ne to be detained till he pro cured the money. THAMES POLICE. JEALOUSY AND ATTEMPTED MURDER OF A WIFE ET HER HUSBAND.—Yesterday Timothy M'Carthy, a middle aged man, a coalwh i pper, who has been in custody for three weeks, was brought befor e M r. B roder i p, for f i na l exami nation, charged with attempti ng to murder h i s w if e, Ell en M'Carthy, by beating her on the head with a poker, by which she received such very serious injuries that her life was for some time despaired of. The woman, who is far advanced in pregnancy', was brought from the hospital to give her evid ence . Sh e ap peared in a ve r y wea k s t a t e , and was accommodated with a chair. On the book being tendered to her to be sworn, she said she could not take the oath in the state she was in. Mr. BRODERIP knew what was passing in the poor woman's mind, and he assured her that her prejudice was ill-founded, and that she could not offend her Maker by taking the oath. All that she was required to do was to call the Almighty to witness that she spoke the truth, and to kiss the book. The woman would speak the truth ; but she would not take the oath until after her confinement. If she did there would be no comfort for her in this world again. Mr. BRoDERIP pointed out at great length the absurdity of the notion which the prosecutrix, in common with many of her countrywomen, entertained that it was offensive in the eyes of Heaven to take an oath while they were enciente. He could assure her that ladies of the first consequence never objected to take the oath when similarly circum stanced, and he could not take her testimony unless she was sworn. The woman, after some further objections, took the oath and was sworn. Mr. 13110DERIP—Now you may be assured that neither you nor your babe will be any the worse in consequence of having taken the oath ; but you would have done very wrong, and offended your God and your country, had you not done so. It appeared from the statement of the poor woman, who was beaten in such a savage manner that she is likely to feel the effects of it for life, that she lived at No. 3, King street, Wapping, and was the mother of several children. On the Thursday night preceding the 13th of August her husband came home and ill-used her, and she went for protection into an adjoining room, in which a man named John Murphy and his wife lodged. They were in bed, and she sat by their bedside until her husband's passion had cooled and he had retired to rest. On the Wednesday following her husband came home to dinner at his usual hour, as full of drink as he possibly could be. The dinner, consisting of beefstakes and vegetables, was ready on the table, and he sat down, and just as he began eating looked at her very spitefully, and said to her eldest child, " I don't mean to work for your mother any more ; but I will do what I can for her children." Witness said, " God bless you, Tim, sit down and make a good dinner," and, at his request, sent for a pint of beer. He kept talk ing and jawing her, and said that John Murphy had told Jem Carney and others that he had given her a good supper in his bedroom after she had re ceived one from her husband on the preceding Thursday night, and he could do as he pleased with her. After her husband had finished his dinner he proceeded towards the fireplace, and stood with his back towards the grate. His countenance was frightful. She sat down on a chair near him, and asked him what was the matter. He gave her no answer, but shortly after she saw him lay hold of the poker very suddenly, and, suspecting his intention, she got up and made for the door, but before she could reach it he struck her a most dreadful blow on the top of the head, and the blood spirted all over the room. She screamed aloud for help, when he beat her in a most savage manner with the poker, and gave her another blow with it on the head. Just at that moment one Mary Collins came into the bedroom, and said, " Don't kill your wife," and dragged her away, and she fainted from loss of blood. She had ever since been in the Hospital. She was certain that her hus band struck her twice on the head with the poker. Mary Collins lodged at No. 3, King-street, and confirmed the statement of Mrs. M'Carthy. Mrs. Elizabeth Coy stated that Mary Collins brought Ellen M'Carthy into her room. Her head was then hang ing down on one side. She appeared to be deprived of life, and the blood was streaming from her head and shoulders : the top of her head was all " a mummy," and there was a depression about the size of the palm of her hand, and several cuts besides. Mr. BRODERIP said it had never been his lot to hear of a more savage and murderous attack than this, and he felt it his duty to commit the prisoner for trial for the capital offence of wounding his wife with intent to murder her. He had observed with regret that the prisoner, instead of show ing any contrition, had been casting the most malignant glances towards his wife while under examination. The prisoner was then sent to Newgate for trial at the next Sessions. HATTON-GARDEN. Yesterday Daniel Harding, a lad about sixteen years of age, was brought before Mr. Sergeant Sellon, charged by Mr. James Black, artist, of No. 28, Rodney -street Penton vile, with having stolen two valuable oil-colour paintings. Ho was fully committed for trial. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. NORTHERN CIRCUIT.—LiNcAsniz, SEPT. 2. (Before Mr. Baron GURNEY. ) TATHAM U. WRIGHT (EIGHTH AND NINTH DAYS). This day thirty-seven witnesses were examined. As the case was foaming to a conclusion, the interest hourly in creased : from an early hour in the morning the equipages of the neighbouring gentry began to arrive in town ; and long before Mr. Baron Gurney took his seat on the bench, the court was crowded by an assemblage of very elegantly dressed females, many of them carrying baskets containing sandwiches, fruit, and wine, so as to enable them to sit out the day. We shall only give a brief outline of the facts stated by the material witnesses. George Singleton, innkeeper at Cartmel, stated that he once attended on Mr. Marsden and Mr. Wright, at dinner, at Mr. Hesketh's, when Mr. Marsden happening to let his knife and fork fall, Mr. Wright called him a blundering old fool. John Tully stated that Mr. Marsden asked him if there was the same sun in Liverpool as there was at Heysham. Nicholas Home stated that he once asked Mr. Marsden what o'clock it was ; Mr. Marsden pulled out his watch, but could not tell the hour ; he also deposed to Wright calling Marsden a d—old fool. John Hale, carpenter and sawyer, was sharpening his saw at Hornby Castle, when Mr. Marsden came in and asked him what tune he was playing on his saw." On tel ling him the use of it he went away crying " Oh, oh ! " Upon all occasions, Mr. Marsden was greatly alarmed at dogs ; and whenever Wright met him he abused him. John Hetherington stated that he was fixing water-closets at Hornby Castle, when Mr. Marsden came in to try them. This witness told a most ludicrous act of the unfortunate gentleman, which we forbear to mention. Thomas Proctor deposed to Mr. Marsden's great appre hension of dogs, pigs, cows, calves, turkey-cocks, ganders, and all species of animals. He also stated upon an occa sion of riding the boundaries, the annual custom of Lords of the Manor, Mr. Wright rode round with the tenants un accompanied by Mr. Marsden ; on their return home, he sent for Mr. Marsden, as usual, to sign the rolls, and upon his refusal, he went out to fetch him, and he heard Mr. Wright using severity towards Mr. Marsden, who was cry ing like a boy of ten years of age. Margaret Pattison, aged 80, was acquainted with Mr. Marsden. This witness deposed to many acts, but par ticularly to his ignorance of calculation ; so much that he could not count the change for half-a-sovereign ; and her description of his fear of pigs, dogs, &c., was truly laughable. Mary Hewitson, aged 85, deposed to seeing Mr. Mars den throwing his hat at some peacocks, and practising an imitation of them for several hours ; and further, to his un bounded affection for check aprons. Robert Hudson stated, that Mr. Marsden asked him if his cropped mare, of which he was particularly fond, could not breed cropped fowls. Matthew Jenkinson saw Mr. Marsden out hunting, when he galloped most valiantly up a hill, but on seeing a check apron on the hedge, he stopped short, and would not go further. Richard Metcalfe, Esq., a gentleman of the county of York, stated that when he was a boy, and Mr. Marsden then thirty-five years of age, he played at cards with him and his brother, and all Mr. Marsden could distinguish were the colours of the cards. Mrs. Green Bradley, of Slyne Castle (a lady of the first distinction in the county), about five or six years previous to the death of Mr. Marsden, paid a visit at Hornby Castle to see the Miss Wrights ; upon that occasion the entire family went into the hot-houses. Upon Mrs. Bradley admiring some of the exotics, Mr. Marsden, who was with her, and a little in advance of the party, said, " Take anything you like." Upon Mrs. B. communicating to Mr. Wright, Mr. Marsden's kind offer, Mr. Wright addressed him, and said, " It is a pretty thing that you should give that which is not your own ; you know that they are none of yours ;" and then, addressing Mrs. Bradley said, " I rent those glasses ;" Mr. Marsden slunk away quite dejected ; Mrs. Bradley then said to Miss Wright, " I fear I have offended the old gentleman ;" she replied, " No, he is not offended— not he—don't mind him ;" when they returned to the house, the party went to the top of the house, where there were two organs—one a barrel and the other a finger one ; Mr. Marsden approached the barrel organ, but in vain essayed to set a tune ; it was set for him ; he then, in the most irregular time, began to play ; his performance was at hostility with every species of harmony (a laugh) ; he played in the greatest imperfection ; time and tone were at perfect variance. Cross-examined—He dined once at Slyne Castle ; he called on a morning visit ; she could not say whether he had a servant when he dined at Slyne Castle ; there was a family party, there was no fixed dinner party ; but on all, and every occasion, witness thought him an idiot. Re-examined by Sir JAMES SCARLETT : Allow me to ask you whether, from all you have seen of Mr. Marsden, you are able to form an opinion as to his competency to transact any of the ordinary business of life ? Mrs. Bradley : Certainly not. Allow me ,to say, that during a period. of seven or eight, I should say ten years, I have dined frequently at Hornby Hall, and it I do not, take a lib er t y ( cur t sey i ng most grace f u ll y t o the Learne d Judge) I would state the reasons upon which I found j "/ opinion. Mr. Baron GURNEY: Mrs. Bradley, certainly not. You have (riven y our ev id ence i n t h e b es t mnn nor : you are! therefore' at liberty to state any fact that brings to you-'' conviction that you should pronounce such an opinion. a Mrs. B ra dl ey : U pon t h e occas i on a ll u d e d t o -1 I" I , my first vi s it t o Hornby Castle, when Mr. Marsden an d were in th e hothouse together—while preceding the (tor t part of the pa r ty, i n or d er to re li eve t h e ennu i of a f escort, I attempt e d a conversat i on a b out many s ubjects re' r lative to whi c h M r . M ars d en seemed co y. I then, no t ° 0 information, a s k e d hi m " h a d h e ever been in London', d He replied, in the tone of a diseased mind, that he had , and he saw the King and Queen ; and he repeated it .several times over. There was not the slightest intellect or row_`; about him ; in the course of human collision, he would t be able to discover the distinctive class to which her - . longed. (This lady's evidence seemed to have crestea deep impression.) (10, The Rev. Robert Gib son , t h e rector o f Bolton-le-Salof l most reluctantly cor ro b ora t e d numerous w i tnesse s ; aflu, the reverend g en tl eman it i s j ust i ce to say, t h a t be it more anxious to c oncea l th e errors o f h uman ity, than w; gaily to expose th em . It was w i t h pa i n h e corr oborate° the previous witnesses' testimony. Several witnesses of the first character and respeeta" ilitl came forward ; amongst whom were East India Direct ors, bankers, and m erc h an t s : t h e l ast w i tness was t h e ce lebrate d e; Doctor Lingard, w h o s t a t e d t h at f rom the year 1 811 „ 1816 he knew Mr. M ars d en ; h e li ve d i n t h e n eighbou r ' _f hood of H orn by C as tl e , an d h a d frequent opportu nities u . seeing him ; he di ne d a t H orn b y C ast l e severa l time there were some occ as i ona l l arge part i es, b ut genera llY s ill 0 ones ; he also had Mr. Marsden to dinner at his o ei r. house, and sometimes met him at the houses of the ne 4 i , homing gentlemen ; f rom hi s k now l e d ge o f hi m he eae l ' a dered him a man of weak intellect ; weak in purpose, la totally incapable of doing what the humblest capacity °el le accomplish ; from a k now l e d ge o f hi s i ncapac i ty , and the utter prostration of his mind, he discontinued his visits; . 1 went abroad in 1817, and did not return for years after 1 0 death ; the charge of his being a Jesuit was utterly fa se ,„; the letters which he heard read could not have been val t ,',,, r 7 by Mr. Marsden ; there was a glaring inconsistency in t 'f n composition ; the first letter particularly alluded to, 1805, 1805, was well written, with the exception of one gr'd matical error ; the two subsequent ones were inelegant al/ full of grammatical errors. , s Mr. Mr. Lonsdale, th e p or t ra it- pa i nter, too k M r. Afarteeed picture at H e y s h am , an d d ur i ng h i s s i ttings he ealli°,:ni, such a vacan c y o f m i n d t h at i t was w i th the utmost is culty he could arouse an exc i tement so as to develops " e. character, w ith ou t w hi c h i t was qu i te impossible to r e - true picture. The wills o f M rs . C oo k son, Mi ss Tatham, and Vt.t Bleasdale were th en put i n an d rea d ; and it appeare d tba Mr. Wright was left legacies to the amount of 210 01 ' The case closed at half-past one o'clock. Mr. POLLOCK rose to address the Jury in reply t t he Learned Gentle man rose ev id ent l y under feelings °'„r greatest excitement. The Learned Gentleman, ;‘, commenting on th e ev id ence , l e f t i t to the Jury to' whether the testimony of Baron Bolland and Colonel Lushington, and the several other highly respectable gene tlemen and clergymen, could be put in contrast witb t centennary o f w it nesses exam i ned on the other Si d e i " The repent an t accomp li ce ," D r. L i ngard, gave un d o nb,t. e ~, evidence of " th e wea k ness o f purpose, " and the infailit'i of human opinion, when that erudite personage endeavuu l l , 6 to classify soc i e ty b y hi s own scale of intellect : but "- forgot his theory while he banqueted at Hornby Castle' Mr. Baron GURNEY sums up the evidence to-in A; and it is hop e d th e ver di ct w ill b e announced by to-nlurr" evening. OLD BAILEY SESSIONS, AUGUST 4. Francis Burton, a genteel-looking young man, wa s ra . dicted for embezzling the sums of 781. and 51. Bd., the P. perty of Margaret Canham, his mistress. In this case, which was not concluded yesterday vib l e9 our reporter left, th e J ury returne d a verdict of Not Gui l ty Roe, age d 30, a pretty-looking woman, wing I 0 dicted for f e l on i ous l y marrying James Brown, her f o rme r husband. Francis Roe, being still alive. James Sla r k, p ar i s h cler of Croydon, stated that prisoner was married in the name of Mary Doggett it , Francis Roe, on the 2d of November, 1819. Th e w ness put in a copy of the register, which was read. Aeti Prisoner--I don't think th e w i tness h as any knowle"' of my person. James B rown , a sergeant of the 2d Regiment of th: Coldstream G uar d s , was marr i ed to the prisoner on t h 26th of Dece m b er , 1825 , at B r i ghton, and produce d a ce r , tificate to that effect. The witness courted the prison; ten weeks ; she represented herself to be a widow, an d j believed sh e was suc h w h en he married her. He lite with he r u p t o S eptem b er, 1833, when he parted with she bet at the r ecommen d at i on of his commanding officer , e j having rep ea t e dl y ro bb e d him, and otherwise misbeha ved herself. Si nce th at h e h ad discovered she was a mar' woman. , Edward Perry knew the prisoner's first husband ;he will a soldier in the Royal Waggon Train, and a servsnt t o Lieutenant Smith. Wit ness was his comrade, and reel; lected his b e i ng marr i e d to the prisoner ; they l i ve d t t gether in the barracks three or four years, until Roe We l, abroad. Wit ness saw R oe a li ve and well in Ord's orif i L e ground, Camb erwe ll, on t h e sth of August last, lieved he was at present at the naval school there. The pris oner , i n h er d e f ence, was left by Roe n ith r child to support, and hearing nothing of him for four 1 13 10 she made Inquiries after him, and was informed 621 ld was dead. Sh e t o ld B rown everyth i ng, and he said he 10, 0 marry her if s h e h a d 20 h us b an d s ; they lived happ ily gether, until his misconduct, instead of hers, induced h er separate. The COURT recalled Brown, and asked him if:the Pd ri ; soner express e d an y d ou b t o f h er fi rst husband ' s deat h. P replied in the negative. Prison er —Did I not te l l you I was awkwardly s i tua " tech not knowing whether Roe was dead or alive ? a d. Witness—She told me R oe went a b road and d i e d abr— n Prisoner—lt is false, so help m e ►H e warq t o marry another woman, and that is the secret of the vi u° matter. ' The Jury found the prisoner Guilty, but recoula 3o3- her to mercy. SOMNAMBULISM. The following tale appears in a late number of the fi g il of gemeine Z e it ung . Af ter stat i ng that the bathing Flaceihst Germany are a ll unusua ll y crow d ed, i t goes on to PI t hat at Nidda, near Salzhausen, there came a gentleman in o t, service of Hesse Darmstadt, who suffered from the Pe e r He was a ccom p an i e d b y hi s d aug h ter, who laboured ` lll to a weakness of the nerves, and in whom a tendency p g somnambulism had been previously remarked. O n e efel s h s soon after el even o ' c l oc k, as t h e f ather was lying in b_el„„lers heard his d aug ht er , w h o s l ept i n a neighbouring chw" Of groaning anx i ous l y , an d cry i ng, " Father, father !" immediat e ly wen t in t o h er room, and found to his nst °l3. r ment and terror th a t th e b e d was empty. ribs ceived He then ribs ceived that th e w i n d ow was open ; and who can des jd er t 0 his horror when he saw his child hanging by the . har t • c h ' the window sill, an d h er b ody out of the window, ber; was high abov e th e eart h ? He immediately seized Yed but, gracious Heaven! terror and sickness had deer' ID. him of all power : all his exertions were in vain, Ai mig plete powerlessness fell upon him, and with a h re 7 i ecl , heart he beheld his beloved daughter fall to the gr l3- 00 1. The noise of the fall, and of the calling, brought a ',near ber of people together, who expected nothing l e ss, on P o t ing of what had occurred, than to find the young !! ° ,i shattered to pieces. But no ! Except a f e w e,0rn..,, - : e ss she was unhurt, though since the fall her nervous w hi er -- si has increased, which it is hoped care and her youn ul sbe enable her to conquer. That she left her bed—t fl i a " o --"' climbed outside of the window—that she had fallen u o- wito was all unknown to her. All that she remembere d, at that sh e d reamed that she was attacked by robbers, fr° whom she concealed herself. B THS. On the 25th u l t., at Baden, the Viscountess Dillon, 6 I°lll still-born. the ltdl On the ht i ns t., i n Montagu-place, Bryanston-square',"gbta f• of Ed war d B urn , E sq., of Templeton House, Surrey, of a ""pq., ° On the 2d inst., in Dublin, the lady of S. W. Blacks'' , Colamber, county of Longford, of a son. MARRIAES. Cot o °l l On the 4th inst., a t St. George's, Hanover-squa!e' ei Wortham, of the Royal Engineers, to Elizabeth 31 11 P ~,,,. daughter of the late Robert Williams Pickwoad, Esq., 111*..9 Chief Justice of the Island of St. Christopher's. 1 ,4 " On the 4th inst., at St. Mary's, Hornsey, Richard ll t h' els"' of Crookham House, Berk s hi re , t o Sarah, only daughter ° John Sancton, Esq., of Hornsey, Middlesex. EATHS. . r 81. 1 On the 3d inst., in Orch ar d-street, Portman-square , 113 .0 he , 0 0 1 " year, Maria Caroli ne , e ld est d aughter of the late Lieut. . Wynyard, Colonel of the 20th Regiment. t St .keih On the 2d inst., at Blackheath, Eliza, Esq., of Fludyer-street, Whitehall. econsbirg4 On the 24th ult., Charles Chichester, Esq., Hall, D_ A, Nor Anne, wife of the Rev. Thomas Hulton, Rector of Gayo''''" it folk, aged 29. - . JoseP wife of Robot. On the 2d inst., in Wilson-street, Finsbury-square) Mr' of Walter, in his 61st y ear . reaslilu On the Ist inst., Th omas Ebenezar, elder sou of Dr. tel." Uxbridge, having survived his younger brother about threeet,birt On the Ist inst., at Foxdown g , Wellington , &su mo. r' s°- Harriet, wife of Joh n W a l ter Lewis, Esq., late of th e India Company's Civil Service, Madras Establishroent --------- London : Printed an d P u bli s h ed by MURD O YOUk O , at The S un Offi ce , N o . 112, Stra" I ; pi o , i e i Pi et P . It,