The Sun. — London, England, 1834-07-18 00:00:00

ALS.' nowever, oven reformed as it is, there are still men, as the :abject Lord Althorn and his wretched colleagues discovered to th e i r cost, who have the spirit and ability to rebuke and Cthey the shifts - E • a Ise as deserve, mean o tergiversation t'd the base artifices of d u pli c it y . Th e sense o f , country will—upon this occasion,—be entirely. ll those, wh o cons ti tute t h e minority of the °u se of Commons. The people of England ex-. Pent same appearance of integrity, some show of manly and : i trai gixtforward chara c t er , i n t h ose w h o asp i re to govern - The Manifest and total want of those Qualities in ( re man wh o h o ld t h e h e l m of the State must ' be ' felt as a ang an injury, and an insult by the community at large ; and accordi ng l y t h e community at large will rejoice when, Pesrusing th e d e b ate of last night, they behold the un-. Prinefi)led leader of the. Ministerial party in the House of, eftitions, and his equally unprincipled followers, writhing, tl nder• the lash of their . able and honourable opponents... 13 ' 4 it is to the discussion of the late Ministerial intrigues and t ergiversations in the House of Lords that we most cacarlr4estly invit e th e attent i on o f the British public. We of c al "pun our rea d ers to j o i n us i n adm i ration and applause the manly and eloquent indignation of Lord Wicklow, of th e grave and sedate reprehension of Lord Wharncliff e , °` tll6, amumentative and statesmanlike animadversions of Ice ' of Wellin g t on , u p on th e recent di sp l ay b y Mi rs of perfidy towards each other, o f indifference to repu ation and consistency, o f reckless disregard to the saf e ty end welfare of the State, which are unmatched by any pre Ceding example in the annals of political treachery and th a rne- Is it possible to imagine. nything more disgraceful an that an Administration should suddenly determine to f tc .. , "Don the opinion of a minority of its Members, the ma- . ' 1311 ,, t 3r , bearing the relative proportion of two to one, having a L iew days before declared with much solemnity and . cm- Pris, that the consequences of so acting would be unjust, s urd., and mischievous in the highest degree ? Yes, there deeper degree of disgrace, than even this. The mea , stz re upon which this differe nce in the Cabinet took place!as a measure intended tc) suppress disturbance and out l'age,in I re l and, and to keep in check the public enemies, °Y Whose efforts disturhaneennd outrage have chiefly been Prom ° t g eu. And the ar:ditional circumstances of disgrace are, that the minority of the Cabinet, by whom the ma _ j,? r itY hare, in def.ance of their own solemnly-declared con viceir tio ns consent/A to be overruled, have avowedly formed con heals tat s ae ystem Peculiar opinions, and constructed their sepa• e of p olicy s, in collusion and concert wit! great the eiaief and leader, of those public enemies which urneavire in discussion was professedly intended to r ain ; sec on dl y , th a t thi s co ll us i on an d concer t between .4; .e, PO:di e e nem i es an d t h e m i nor i ty o f t h e C a bi net h ave it.been cop - carried on by the latter in secret t reac h er y to their ss , .eagues, and that their triumph sanctions and ratifies a - i. Bte rig of treachery among the .Members of the King's `-'onlicil which is wholly incompatible with the vigour, effi - :iaeY, r ds: eputation, and stability of any Government ; and, thet 'the surrender of principle in this particular eai.se theses'iml and must necessarily produce, a total transfer all boriygovernment to the public neini eS Wh h avenh es tablished the predominance of. o. US es . S • b " ; ', lr Party in the Cabinet. This is the disgraceful and per rimis character of the transaction, and that it is so proofs - ft''e alr ea d y appeared. The personal, friend and political '` ) ilfede ra t e o f .Mr. O'Connell, without a single quail c % at ion for th e o ffi ce ot h er t h an t h at h e i s t h e per nell n at /nem]. and political confederate of Mr. O'Con , has 'oecome Secretary of State for the Home De ..trt„.ll).,erlt, the official head of that department of Governme n t to which the preservation of peace and • th er in Irel an d i s espec i a ll y entruste d ; an d , i n return f or • 18 Splendid piece of patronage, Mr. O'Connell, the great jagosiotrade, t pr r Fif Ireland, the c hi e f promoter of all the tumult, and outrage which the Coercion Bill was intended i n suppress, Makes a parade of his -unbounded confidence i s 4 t ,_ 11 .e Administr a ti on o f w hi c h, b y hi s proper d e l ega t e , h e "'us Permitted to form substantially a part. The subject mast alueli too grave •fortnirth, or a burst of universal laughter reN'erberate from one extremity of the country to the thother, when the de c l a r a ti on o f L or d M e lb ourne i s he ar d th ' - tt he will convoke Parliament at any season of the year if t . Coerci on Bil l, as it is to pass with the entire approba- LI" of Laird D uncannon an d M r. O'C onne ll , s h ou ld f a il to ifep Ireitand in a state of peace. Lord Melbourne may s' s.tmor 'tnything we know, a well-meaning man, and indeed l4Achy be a proof of good intentien, he must be.al weus that praise in a higher degree 'than any other being e-.sistence•- If there was any sincerity in what Lord li,!, ll3 ourne said, never certainly was there a man who so 'sto understood his own actual position.—Morning Post, ,The actual completion of the (query, new ?) ministry, !hick was announced last night in the House of Commons, does not is by suggest either surprise or observation, or interest i t • - "Y deep or eager kind, seeing that the composition of journals for what had been expected and predicted in the to the,c s r. two . days past. The only announced accession Cabinet is Lord Duncannon, a good man of business, as we have already stated—and a nobleman of great worth 7 and honour ; but as lie had belonged to the government before, though not as a member of the Cabinet, it cannot be said that his Lordship adds any positive strength to the Reneral mass o f t h e adm i n istration.' Sir John Hobliouse, -...'attu succeeds Lord Duncannon, is a scholar and a gentle , I P, ,an, a man - o f elegant taste, of various talent, and of . CTal panics ;as such, the Right Hon. Baronet must i ue considered an acqu i s i t i on to- every society of which he ' 7 _,PADatn e s a part.. We do not kn ow th a t h e h as y e t no - N . gone any very arduous 'ordeal as a statesman, but 13 short administration of the War Office, in which Mr. Edward Ellice succeeded him, appears to have gained 11101 t the goo dwill o f th ose w ith w h om h e h a d i n t ercourse . ' t cannot be denied that whatever metal the Ministry ' 1 1 1 .3 , be composed of, it was somewhat loudly and roughly ti ru ng upon by certain- Noble Lords in the course of yester-) ev,eiliog. An intimati o n h av i ng -b gen given by Lord i el bOurne, that the I r i s h C oerc i on Bill, as i n t ro d uce d b y he present Cabinet, was not to contain the clauses against 4 edit: I °ol , meetings destruction broke upen the Noble Vis - 13 11 _ 14 and his colleagues from the. Opposition side of the , s • " s e, as if th e contents of the cave of iEolus being con ' 'Yled to. the keeping -of " Narcissus," the self-:charmer ha?, iti r g a tten- his t rus t, and lei loose a whole hurricane V'p on v e he a d s of the devoted' Ministers. The Noble -Lord, f _"wever, was met by a counterblast which was e noug h to tfilghten dEolus hi mse lf, muc h more to bl ow away Nar tBT s . 1,40 W ," said - Lord Melb o u rne , '° tell that Noble - ari 4 p r i , as I told him ' on a f ormer occas i on , th at w i t h hi m I *d i not enter into a contest of insult and contumely. I could might call, as hard names as that Noble Earl. I might atilinte to hi m b as e , an d fact i ous, and personal mot i ves. I 4 4 4 , 11 impute - to him that he was actuated by two pas ., strongest that human nature can be actuated by 440,rtifi.ed. vanity and . disappointed ambition." With re , this Coercion 131,14 let us endeavour to state the rtsl-04._.facts of the case. The decision of the matter ought la n d 3t . as4 uredlifo . ive - at on fads ,exhibiting the state of Ire the , and it would appear that, on the facts contained in ap e m . als of Parliamentary .documents lately printed re 'l: Irel an d—l st , L or d W e ll es l ey d emanded the re= hi t 1 ° f the Coercion Bill, 111i11214 the _courtmartial clauses; di ts e xcellency holding the pr c edi a l disturbances to- be in -43,j' " 1 :7 connected with the inflammat o ry meetings', of °l m'Al and- his gang.. 2d, After some bandying about tiihiscr.et correspond ences an d ver b a l communications, i att Fa had many o f them too much ' of the character of attachea.to them, th e C a bi ne t a d op t e d th e fi rs t e i n P n r e,ssion s of Lord • Wellesley, and carried the Coen it, e l in, such as th a t N o bl e -M arqu i s h a d -recommen d e d p re ' r nngh the - House - of Lords: It is. true that, on re ,,,,cBentationS being made' to Lord Wellesley - of the state ties here in England,' and of embarrassments ' fo re 4.nlight thence arise 'to the Ministry from the en lzohTit.l2_ent of the- L o td-Li eu t enant ' s f u ll d eman d , t h at t o a znan thought fit to wave the part o bj ec t e d t o , an d I,7olM 3 ress his willi ngness to carry on t h e G overnment as si te ' r as he could without it : but, not to dwell upon details, - Pr o b 4 wai, that th e bill Unaltered received 'the final ap- Ivi t h"on of th e same ,Ministers, who now come forward co ati ' a ilother bill, far•dilter en t from that - which they so re it I , 4_, t a PProved ; and omitti ng , t oo , those very portions of ea ten -the Lord Chancello r h a d d ec l are d to b e no l es s call e d i n tlal han the others,_Which we re di rec t e d aga i ns t w h a t :bo nr4; p t r h e e ed j inarig so properly denounced by Lord Mel ish, •, ” on disturbance. We like; however, the V 5 .,? 1 ,411 to be liberal, and think that a good deal is to tors fo a r the ge n er o u s con fid en e e th us reposed b y Minis toatilin Parliament, and great credit due to Lord Mel . 4 lool d i t °r his . m an l y reso l u ti o n to sum mon P ar li ament, object t be necessary, a a day's notice, and for no oth er i t Ina t ha n the passing a stronger Coercion Bill, although if 40tYrue dreaded that from a mere appetite for confusion, th at better, th e ag i tators may t a k e care to i m p ose and it s t e 're • and irksome a l ternat i ve on the Government, the most inconvenient season.—Times. 1 --- . . . and said to r ll . 9P itoßlA.—The following is a simple, said r an efficacions remedy for the bite of ama dog, cat, aa l d 1 - ; 'e- The wound must be instantly washed with salt ~,,iterater, take inwardly a table-spoonful of salt in glass fr esh and aPPIy a poultice of wet salt to the wound a ; Make a ti it , e .appliegion of the same every two hours, three or four s. rely. rel at "-LUNG NEW.—An agricultural friend has 411'7- S i , th t° at 1 7 vv t e h: f _f h o i l s lo e w e i w n s g :—He had observed, for some • il4 the m orn i nm gave' but very small quantities of Wings, at night they gave the usual quantity, b at a i t n tho• Illorning,it was not unfrequent for them to withhold they ogether. Ile could not account for it, but was satisfied toui t i rn "t } lave been milked, yet with all' his precaution he 4 few clilOt discover the offender. Yet the evil continued, until' sized h a ys since;when it was cliscovered that a couple of good-, ' D i aY . c 'gs were stat i oned, one on each side of the cows, Ti le co g s the p art of the calf" with much self-complacency. t o ge t h"er ws and ho gs h ad been kept at night in the barn-yard ti 4te , and it appeared that the grunters had so far ingra imtd Luemselves into the good graces of the cows as thus to be ged with the first milking. —Auburn Journal (America); PAPER. No. I. . A.' RETURN of the Number of P oun d s W e i g h t o f PAPER ma d e i n each Collection of EXCISE,. during each of the last Three Years ; distinguishing the Qualities, whether of the First or Second , Class, with the Amount of Duty thereon. Year 1831. , Year 1832. . Year 1833, e - ,d ClaS Ist Class. 2d Class. - Amount of • Ist Clasi. * • 2d' Class. Amount of ~,.. , "COLLECTIONS., tat - Class. '', - :441 mount of Duty. Duty. . ...........1............ ...... , .10...,..,...... .............. Doty. ENGLAND. lbs. lbs. -- Z., .s. d: lbs. 9 ) ,. . .f. 'a. d. lbs. • lbs.- 3 Barnstaple 105,713 ,L 8 ,9 81 1,110 (1 101 149,090 37,950 ' 2 , 1 00 ' l6 3 138,590 , 52,874 2,061 16 9 3 Bath ' , Bedford. ' ' 591,22 T ' 136,739 8,257 9 l 771,897 142 236 '10,575 3 9 631,446 114,567 8,646 12 41 91 , 1 8 8 27,241 . 1,309 19 4 98,742 19,715 1,345 9 101 , 9 3, 28 ) 17,791 1,277 6lf ' Bristol 97,054 . 6,620 1,254 11 0 206,052 12,908 2,6.56 6 6 371,723 2,315 4,662 94i ; Cambridge 690,875 - 6,6 4 5 8,677 941 788,791 8,120 9 910 12 9 783, 4 6 1 , 4,630 9,884 14 0 Canterbury., 801,542 648 458 13,809 12 9 948,104 423,412 14,497 12 6 985,201 403.910 14,839 9 0 Chester 435,311 • 59,967 5 , 816 II ji 461 ,3 38 , 63,439 6,163 3 3 514,5.59 - 53,814 6,768 6 3 -. Cornwall 13 5 , 513 331,114 3,782 2 6 194,448 3,313 11 6 c Coventry 63,603 27,1161 1,026 14 101 100,6.29 43,807 1,531 13 11 132 , 304 39,7 M 1,902 2 6 ' Cumberland 183,201 179,/11 3,418 411 167,862 212, 1 .93 32,198 2,851 5 6 250,626 29,591 3,31715 44 220,341 26,825 2,921 18 41 r Derby 666,800 96,536 8,939 4 6 654,571 109,294. 8,865 5 3 704,690 143,683 9,699 3lf ' Dorset. '94,059 101,277 4808 14 41 31,083 - 82,907 931 14 If 33,CM 80,621 924 9101• • Durham' 993,314 ' 591,751 16,171 9 101 994 234 644,882 16,508 9 9 - 1 , 062 . 7119 714 . 507 17 , 7 4 9 10 74 , , ;. Essex 26,610 2,951 351 1 9 22,547 3,331 302 16 0 20,527 2,381 271 941 , Exeter • 2,064,296 840,162 31, 0 '51 11 9 1,7;t1,609 806„,...675 26,711 . 16 71 1,803,980 1,066,231 .4,213 14 3 Gloucester ....... ! Grantham 102,773 31,022 1478, 11 6 '78,047 31,942 ' 1,182 14 6 58,104 26,612 893 7 6 Halifax . .391,813 , 8',763 5,402 871 1,70;913 597,688 25009 16 9 2,597,93:1 719,630 36;41 18 6 ' Hants 1,299,511 27,193 16,413 17 71 1 412 ' 452' 97,165 , 18 , 387, 18 71 ' 1,424,7281 301,233 16,741 18 9 Hereford 845,770 1,043,915 17,598 15 71 815,441 1,152,081 17,806 041 858,303 1,038;258 17,217 18 0 Hertford - 111,381 1,392 6 0 137,94 - 1,743 16 0 124,943 1,561 15 9 Hull 21,069 33,296, 329 3 0 16,39, 22,092 . - 312 18 3 . 16,786 • 21,644 363 17 0 . ' Isle of Wight 15 6 ,705 39,5 (3 9 2,n07 19 101 159,813 35.449 2,219 6 101 1 64 , 637 3 1,320 2,257 11 9 Lancaster 1714429 123.126 3,015 10 6 995,3*i 137,399 13,301 1 104 1,656,964 17.5,491 21,808 17 41 Leeds 24 6 6 2 :8 20 14 1 93:467812 166 ltif 1,405,...08 771,747 22,407 541 1,3: , 9,263 809,605 22,550 16 41 1, 4 6 0 ,332 8 32,8 6 3 23,460 341 Lichfield 216,112 , 210,959 4,01917 1(4 2'71,309 204,974 4,712 9 0 . 307 , 177 301 ,8 0 1 5,725 19 41 . Lincoln . 263,044 127,i ('8 4,i'89 14 6 227,759 121,816 3,608 14.. 3 199,334 95,331 3,087 14 101 Liverpool 1,483 16 3 273,887 Lynn 564566 19'2,102 8,232 14 :3 2,482,943 1,551,981 40,735 8 41 - 3,199,506 (j3 18 9:7 7 2 231,205 9,442 711 6 3 4 ,0 1 9 Manchester 1,837,100 51,475 14 0 3,447,396 1,946,652 55,259 0 6 Marlborough 250 , 036 15,734 3,231 641 60,612 .2,818 - 775 3 3 Collection discontinued. Newcastle 916,322 2,164,888 26,009 11 6 1,254,377 2,012,486 28,257 15 0 1,362,8`30 1 1 2,358,342 31,775 0 3 Northampton .. . 'Northumberland....., 193,2)0 2,415 26 . 39,691 496 2 9 , Collection discontinued. Northwich 711,140 277,477 • 10,624 11 71 274,570 192,719 4,636 12 41 363,400 251,459 6,114 244 Norwich : 174,823. J 171,57'2 3,257 12 3 178,072 159,9381 3,236 15 3_l 253,073 121,364 3,929 8 9 Oxford 848,046 44,093 10,876 313 874,422 • 28',197 . 11,106 12 7-1 874,137 14,079 11,014 14 11 Plymouth 180,610 95,104 2,852 13 0 350,661 143,415 5,279 12 101 618 , 912 15 5, 19 6 8 ,706 7 6 Reading 1;966,758 . 3' , 7,213 .26,50 06 . 2,287,..65 607 , 79 5 32, 389 15 7 2,656,193 51°,615 36,393 12 7 4 Rochester 4,729,365 . 772,3:11 63,944 3 0 4,855,001 .851,701 66,010 12.10 4 4,514,100 816,858 61,906 11- 3 Salisbury 381,850 41,990 5,035 11 3 - 321;44 36,142 4,238 18 9" 326,505 33,229 4,288'19 101 Salop 6 3,902 r 0,768 WI 1 6 65,344 *22,715 9.59 14 4-1 57 ,737 21,589 856 12 9 Sheffield 475,961 521,941 9,230 7 101 50,679 429,419 9,717 7ii 521,229 465,681 9,425 17 4 Somerset , 345,155 1,718 4,325 7 3 74017 118 900 19 0 Collection discontinued. Stafford 221,950 :0,903 3(192 17 101 243,852 18,244. 3,162 3 6 225,701 14,4.11 2,911 12 0 Stourbridge 14,602 10,599 248 15 44 17,366 17,501 326 SI 14 12 628 , 28,318 331 16 9 Suffolk. 165,913 253,260 3,656 15 9 136,420 - 212,064 3,030 13 0 133,250 ,196,562 2,894 2 9 Surrey Bl 866 1,023 6 6 110,723 1,381 0 9 147,222 1,840 5 6 / Sussex 4 05,043 19,283 5,191 11 4 1 535,435 - 17.788 6,804 2 3 516,830 19,098 6,579 14 9 Uxbridge 6,371,492 '777 711626 014 6,785,599 84,819 19 9 6,50 0 ,E071 Wales, East 45,157 41,661 621 16 104 55,320 90.067 1,254 8 . 41 53,122 36,430 893 16 9 Middle - - - _ _ _ - -...._ North.... ........ 46,723 2,699 3 11 West 58,802 55,618 1,161 12 9 95,343 . 68,712 1,624 4, 9 .97.154 18,021 1,709 II 1, Wellington - ' 360,374- 162,214 5,518 10 3 152,758 135,508 2,756 8 0 77,216 123,117 1,731 13 71 Whitby 112,240 + 110,855 1,783 6 101 238,502 57,0 1 23 3,837:13 41 . 470,647 123,579 6,655 911 Wigan 2,624,372 894,714 :18,395 12 3 601,279 169,315 -8,611 14 11 Collection discontinued. Worcester -York. • , - , 120,593 43,102 1,776 16 0 101,136 27,329 1,435 7 6 97,315 26,276 1,380 13 74 • ----- ------. - Total Country Col: - lections "' " 37,880,312 '13,268,757 556,433 12 74 39,677,011 13,246,0151 578,750 484 41, 724 ,9774 14,187,1;77 610,235 18 114 • London, within. the . . • ,- - limits of the Chief Odic- .. ... 748;942 37,457 9,5`9517 71 815,140 211,218 11,509 7 3 4,010,501 , 10,593 12,697 10 14 -----___ _..,-...---- -----. --_---- - - Total England 38,629,251 13,3 ( 6,214 a 36,0.9 10 3 40,492,151 13,457,2331 590,259 11 1.1; 42,733,4211 14,198,390 622,933 9Of SCOTLAND. - Aberdeen * 783,179 292,528 11,640 10 9 66c,733, . .251,743, .42,332 11 .11 944,953 243,517 13,333 1 7 10 1 Ayr ' ' 205,917 197,515 3,8:8 12 44. '257,615 '268,963, ' 4,901 411 232,996 263,731 4,560 15 9 Argyle, North - - - - 1 ---- South - - _ . - , - . - - - -, "_ - Caithness - - -- - • - . -- Dumfries ........ - 1 •• , 1 . 1 22,660 11,701 356 ' 7 7 4 Edinburgh ........« - - - - - - - - Elgin ~ , -. Fife • 315,295 4,846 4,316 9 6 403,225 3,501 5,062 3 101 426,155 . 1,502 5,33 6 6 6 Glasgow .... . ..... -..., 938,76.3 .. 244,6 2 1:3,203 11 0 278,775 215,467 12,331 7. 11 831,607 253,419 11,978 19 11 Haddington ......... Inverness ,• • ,- - ---.- - - .Linlithgow • 161,649. 111,8494 2,719 13 51 196,146 109,927 * 83.138 17 41 ' 281;692 173,260,1 4,641 3Of Montrose - - • -- - - - -- - - Perth 117,843 . 4,674 1,502 5 0 97,878 , 3,211 1,243 10 - 101 99,535 2 , 214 1,253 5 0 Stirling 385,421 190,243 6,006 16 .41 304,553' - 228,520 5,235 3 3 . 284,093 '186,906 1:714 19 0 . --=-*-- - ~..----.. Total-_- Scotland ~. 6,775,(32 . 1,579,4764 94,559 12 61 7,203,035 1,603,745 10:4061 6 104 ..7,317,789 ,1,770,2251 102,536 5 54 IREf..AND. . ' • ,Armagh Athlone --. - - --- Clonmel .......,, .. „-. - . - - - - - - - - Co l er aineCoer 164,100 121,637 2,811 974 190,417 '77,126 2,86212 6 .* 238,903 94,062 3,574 3 6 154,657 44,568 . 2, 01 15 3 202,723 49,436 2,843 0 3 163,751 51077 2,612 811 Drogheda 12,151 151 18 6 15,624 195 6 0 13,374 167 3 6 -Dublin .. .. ... ~,,, - 114 17 0 10,047 - 102 126 5 3 Dundalk - ...-- ... .. • - . -- Foxford - _ - - - - - - Galway :9,130 361 2 6 81,882 398 10 8 '105,553 1,319 8 9 Kilkenny , _ , _ - - - - - - • - •• ....• - - Limerick 24,629 ' 13,614 . 392 19 0 15,269 9,131 24916 0 16 ,784 14,157 298 571 Lisburn 14,991 14,468 277 18 9 27,805 21,592 482 10 3 71,767 38,023 1,140 7lf Londonderry - 16,424 175 15 0 Ma llow ugh :59,389' 54,875 - 1,085 671 * 51,253 5(1,289 992 10 74 39,622 33,314 703 9 9 ro - - - . - - Naa s - 13,377 12 6 1,090,110 827712 14,143 6 6 Sligo ' - - - -', - -- - Wexford W Tralee - - - Waterford - 2 151,918 2,252 0 3 , -- --- ---- -.- ------ Total Ireland - - - 69,642 19.212 11 6 1,709,222 470,081 1 24,303 5 470,81 1 24,303 5` 7, 1 ,';1 1,883,599 1,883,599 • 508,490 26,785 8 9 No. 11. • A RETURN of the Quantity of PAPER EXPORTED f rom G rea t B r it a in and Ireland, in each of the last Three Years, with the Amount of DRAWBACK thereon. , Year 1821 Quantity Exported, Ist Class. I 2d ClaSs. Year 1832, Amount of Quantity Exported. Amount of Drawback.' • ht Clais. 2d Class. Drawback. lbs. lbs. X. s. d. lbs. lbs. X. 6. (1. Great Britain 2 2 142, 928 153,430 27,745 10 9 2,329.797 167,977 30,172 6 4 Ireland 41,215 4,337 579 15 10 29,2 - 35 2, 6 89 38'2 4 10 Total ...... I 2,187,143 Excise Office, London, June 30, I 157,767 28;'25 6 7 1.&31, ' IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. ROUSE OF LORDS, July 17. Year 183:1 II Quantity Exported. lst Clam I 2d Class. lbs. lbs. 2,877,V7 48,050' 7,741 238.036 First General 38,05516 - 3 Accountant. Amount of :Drawback. X. L d. 37,406 15 9 649 0 6 ,1 2,359,02 I 44!:W 6 0,5.54 11 2 ( 2,925 ; 47 G. A. COTTRELL, Noble. Lord would state.whether the Government would give any encouragement to that Bill or not.—(Loud laughter.) COERCION BILL._(IRELAND.) The LORD CHANCELLOR then moved that the House do now adjourn, when—. Lord.ELLENBOROUGH said that last night they had been given to expect that the Noble Viscount would be in his place that night, and be prepared to state the course that Go vernment intended to pursue relative to the Coercion Bill, Viscount MELBO IJRNE said it was not the intention of Government to propose to that House the' third reading of that Bill ; the Governinent did not intend to proceed further. With it there. In making' that Statement, however, it was his duty to state, that it was the inten tion of Government to introduce a ' Bill into the other House which would renew certain parts of that Bill.—(This statement was received by the House with' intense silence.) The Earl of WICKLOW then rose and said—M F L or ds, since I have had a seat in this Howse, I never have heard an announcement from a Minister of the Crown with greater astonishment than the one just made;--(Trerneridotta cheering from the Oppositi on .) , I s i t possible—is it credible - --is it to be supposed, tit a minister who but a fortnight, nay, not ten days ago—( C ont i nued cheer ing)--was then at the head of the Gov ernment, came down to this House, and stated, in the most en erget i c and deter mined manner; the absolute necessity for th e preservation of The Ireland;that isiobleL tohrd w is Bi h l l o s i h ta o n u d ld , p at s s t s h . e ( h C o a h tt ee e m from the Opi)osilion;) Onternment,wa s the n Secretary for the Home Deo.rtrnent—(Cheers)—whose duty it was' to impress on his Majesty's Government the necessity for this measure. • The Noble and Learned T.,Ota a the woolsack_.._( Loud cheering from OW opposition side) — my. Lords, the Noble and -Learned Lord may smile—it will be well for the Noble arid Learned Lord if his character is regarded in the eyes of the country at any future time in such a manner , as will give him' reason 'to - smile At hit eon duet on this occasion. —:( Immense cheers fhrn the Opposition.) MY Lords, such a degree of inconsistency, such a degree of tergiyers a ti on' of total abandonment of principle--(Cheers)-- of a n y man at the head of his country, I think has never been witnessed, in either: House of Parliament.--( Heel') heat. ) Noble Lords might rest satisfied, although it might suit their convenience to . retain their places—( Hear, hear)._ and to - throw.overboard, not only their principles., but the well being and peace of the country ; although, my Lords, I say this may suit their convenience, yet I say this country, and more particularly Ireland, will look with a degren or Itiarm to the situation in which we are plaeeth My Lords, if his Majesty's Government had stated during the early pro gress of this measure that they did not believe that a measure of this kind was necessary, I should not even then have been contented to have trusted the maintenance of btAce to the same individuals ; but when we find t 6 whole Ca binet declaring their unanimity of opinion that the Bill was absolutely necessary-4 Hear)—l say it is a degree of baseness, and a degree of desertion of principle, that has not been witnessed- in this country since the Revolution, and which, - I must confess; will create the greatest alarm and astonishment throughout the empire. It is only a few nights ago that the Noble- Earl then at the head of the Government stated, or at least insinuated, that he had been grossly and basely. betrayed by some Honourable Member of the Administration. Well then, I say, it is due to the yre sent Administration- , -composed as it is now of the same indi viduals—l say, my Lords, it is due to their honour and in tegrity, that the individual to whom that Noble Earl alluded should be held up to universal scorn.—( Cheers.) He knew that In an early part of the Session, with ; regard to a portion of the Irish constituency, when it was stated that an individual had. acted like a traitor.—( Hear, hear.) We all know what course was pursued on that occasion.--r Hear, hear.) every man insisted .on the Minister of the Crown de claring to whom that allusion was made ; and the same course ought to be followed with regard to the prestiii, Government.--(Hear.) A statement has been made by the Noble Earl who was late at the head of the Administration that he has been betrayed-Lthat an individual had clandes tinely, and without his knowledge, communicated and corresponded with others with respect to the Government of Ireland, and in consequence of that the Noble Earl was obliged to abandon his post---(Loud cheering.)—. It is due to the honour of the Government, that the indi vidual who has so acted should be pointed out. I have risen my Lords with more than usual surprise, and have expressed myself with more than usual warmth,—( Hear,)—but when it has. been declared by those to Whose guidance the welfare of the country is entrusted; that 'they mean to abandon that measure which, a few days ago, they said was absolutely necessary there was every excuse for speaking with more than usual warmth, as there was no chance, or hope, or confidence, could be placed in them.--( Cheers from the Opposition.) Lord WHARNCLIFFE could but' express his surprise at the situation in which the House had been placed by his Ma hesty's present Ministers. N ot on l y the Noble Earl lato at the' ead of his' Majesty's Government, but the Noble Lord on the Woolsack Thad stated that it would be unjust to pass tho Bill in question without the insertion of those several clauses which had been so often adverted to. Notwithstanding this, the • Noble Viscouat had now come down to the House, and stated that it was the opinion of his Majesty's Government that the passing of the Bill was unne cessary.—(Loud cheers.) He (Lord W.-) was as unwilling as any man could be that the House should force upon M:nis ters any measure of this description-4 Hear, hear, hear)—. ..but he thought that- Ministers were not only bound to tell The LORD CHANtELLOR took his seat on the Woolsack at half-past four o'clock. ESTABLISHED CHURCH. Petitions in support of the Established 'Church were present ed by Lord DYNEVOR from GlamOrgan, by Lord ROLLE from several places in Devon, by Lord Wictmow and the Bishop of EXETER, from Stonehouse, De on. POOR LAWS AMENDMENT BILL. •.. . Lord HOWARD of UFINGHAM presented a petition from- Scotland, against toe Poet. Law Amendment. . • BANKIttPT (SCOTLAND) BILL. • 'The'LORD CHANCELLOR presented- a petition from the Dean of / .4'aculty of Edinburgh, praying that the above Bill might b.'e postponed till next session. LONDON AND WESTMINSTER BANK BILL. .___ • The 2ail of WICKLOW presented petitions from certain sharokiolders, praying 'that the above Bill might be - passed iato I,ivr. LIVERPOOL PASSAGE BILL. , Lord WHARNCL PPE _presented a petition from Liver pool, praying their Lordships to pass the Liverpool Passag e Bill into a law. The Noble Lord then moved that the Bill be read a second time: The LORD CHANCELLOR said he objected to the Bill because it would be partial in its operation, and also because it went generally for too great an extension of jurisdiction. How ever, he would not object to the second reading, as probably the Objectionable clauses might be removed hereafter. The Bill was then read a second time. COUNTY CORONERS' BILL. The'Duke of RICHMOND 'presented a petition from the Medical practitioners of Lincoln, praying that a claUse might be introdueed into the County Coroners' Bill to enable the Coroner to remunerate Medical practitioners for their attend anep at Inquests as witnesses. - POOR LAW AMENDMENT BILL. The LORD CHANCELLOR gave notice that he would on Monday next bring Amendment Bill, the Poor L a w Bill, by moving that it be read a second time. . Viscount MIILBOURNe entered the House at a quarter past five o'clock. _.RELIGIOUS,ASSEMBLIES BILL. Lord., S,LIFFIELD,_ in.moviug the second reading of the Religions Assemblies Bill, observed that bo did so for the purpose of going into Committee, when he should in troduce a clause applicable to the Colonies. The Noble Lord called on the Right Reverend Prelates to maintain the doctrines of their own Church. , The Bishop of E XE TER, in consequence of being called on by the Noble Baron, felt himself bound to make a few observations upon the Bill. It• was in, direct opposi tion to one of the most important doctrines of the Church of England.—( Hear, hear, hear.) The Noble Baron had confined himself to topics not in the Bill, and had told their Lordships if they would only allow it to be read a second time, ,he, would introduce a clause which would make it applicable to the colonies. The Bill, as it at present stood, was applicable to thil state of religious worship in Great Britain and Ireland. If, therefore, their Lordships consented to read the Bill a second time, because the Noble Lord had promised to introduce a clause that would make it applicable to the colonies, they would be con senting to its second reading, without an atom of argument adduced in its favour. His principal objection to the Bill was, that it would make it lawful for any number of persons to meet for the worship of God in any private dwell_ ing house, without being certified, and it would enable any person to teach or preach at such place without taking any oath or declaration, or without taking out any licence for that purpose. He felt convinced that the parties introducing the Bill had no object in view but to protect 'the doctrines of the Church of England ; bat, taking the Bill as a whole, he had such objec tions to it that he should move the second reading that day six months. . The Earl of WICKLOW was surprised at the motion of the Right Rev: Prelate. He trusted he would withdraw it in order that the objectionable part might be withdrawn. The Bishop of DEithY was against the measure. The LORD. CHANCELLOR' did not feel himself at liberty to give his concurrence to the Hear. hear.) lie objected to the powers it gore for persons to meet with out • leave from the Bisliops.--( Hear, hear, hear.) It was not giving the Vicar of the parish fair play, for it allowed other persons to set up a rival shop with his own goods ; as by tho Bill as it then stood, the liturgy entire might be used without eontroul. He trusted the House would not pass the present measure, but' he also trusted that the next session would not pass over without some measure being perfected for the relief of churchmen on that point. Lord SUFFIELD replied, and the question having been put, the Bill was thrown out. - - THE DISSENTERS. Lord ROLLE said, that seeing the Noble Lard now at the head of the Government in his place, he begged to ask of him whether he meant to introduce into that House any measure to allow Dissenters to graduate at the universities of England? Viscount MELBOURNE said, that cert a i n l y it was not the intention of Government fo introduce such a measure ; but he understood there was a Bill in the other House •for such a purpose, which would most likely soon reach that House. Lord ROLLE said that perhap'as that was the case, the THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY, JULY 18, 1834, the House the reasons why they had abandoned the Bill, but also all the circumstances that had taken plaeo to induce them to adopt that course. If the Bill was dropped in that House, and was brought up from, the other, he would not suffer it to pass one single stage without giving it his do cided and determined opposition.—( Hear, hear ) The LORD CHANCELLOR then rose. As he had been alluded to personally, in no very measured language-- language which he could , assure -the Noble Lord who had used it, he received with perfect calmness and indifference-- (Loud cheers. )--he felt himself called upon to say a few words to the House. He , would first take notice of the asser tion of a fact upon which a conclusion had been raised which astonished him more than any assertion of a fact he had ever heard.—( Hear, hear.) In that astonishment he was sure he should be borne out by every Noble Lord who heard him, and by the colleagues of his Noble Friend late at the head of the Administration.--( Hear, hear.) He (the Lord Chancellor) was compelled by necessity, from the situation he occupied, to hear all that passed in that House, and he would take upon himself to say that the words that had been attributed to his Noble Friend late at the head of the Administration, were never uttered by him, nor even the colour of words having such a meaning. It had been stated that he said he had been betrayed by some person on this side the water. He would ask any Noble Lord who was present if his Noble Friend used anything approaching to the word " betrayed." ( Cries of " Not the word, but the meaning.") Was it nothing, then, that a person in office, whether high or low should be called a traitor.—( Great cheer ing.) It was admitted, that his Noble and Learned Friend had not used the word betrayed," and that being so, he (the Lord Chancellor) desired to know the words that were used by his Noble Friend upon which such an assertion could be founded. He (the Lord Chancellor) would repeat - again, that his Noble Friend had never used such a word, or anything amounting to it.—( Hear. ) His Noble Friend had expressed his surprise that a communi cation had been made by a gentleman in office to one out of it, but he had never said anything which had the colour or or even the tincture that he had been betrayed.—( Cheers. ) But it had been said there was a traitor in the Cabinet, and that statement was meant to have reference to this Right Hon. Fried the Secretary for Ireland ; with respect to that he had only to say, it was perfectly well known that the person holding that office was not a member of the Cabinet.—( Cheers. ) A NOBLE LORD from the Opposition here said the Chan cellor ofthe Exchequer was meant. -- -- The Lord CHANCELLOR said this was the first time he had ever heard that Noble Viscount charged with the offence ---(A laugh)—indeed he could not conceive what had put such an absurd idea into the head of the Noble Lord who had put forth the suggestion : it was absurd, however, to make any further observation. He trusted he had satisfied the House that nothing about" betraying" or " traitor " had been said by the Noble Earl lately at the 'head of affairs, and that the only expression made by him, was dissatisfaction at such a communication having been made by a person in office to a person not in office.—( Hear, hear.) With reference to the Bill itself, or any circumstances attending it, he should be ready ,to meet any objections or observations the Noble Earl might have to make, 7.t any time during the progress of the Bill. Ho would only, on the present occasion, put it to the Noble Earl whether he considered that the Government would be best consulting their duty, and the best interests of all parties, by attempting to force these three clauses upon the House of Commons, when they knew that that House would as soon consent to the repeal of the Catholic Relief Bill, or the Reform Bill itself, as to pass these clauses ?—( Loud cheers from the Ministerial benches ?) Had they attempted this, they might well have been charged with a tiesire to promote a collision between the two houses--( Hear, hear)---and would have been responsible for the due effects of such a collision ; and, for himself, he could solemnly declare that had he, to the slightest extent, promoted such a fatal line of conduct, he should never have been able to justify himself to his Sovereign, to their Lordships, or to any other tribunal--(Cheers)—but, as the case stood, he trusted that he should be able to justify his conduct to all parties.--( Cheers.) The Earl of WICKLOW repeated that his impression still was, notwithstanding the denial of the Noble and Learned Lord, that the Noble Earl (Grey) had stated that there had been some communications between Members of the Ministry and the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.--( Hear.) He had not the power of sarcasm of the Noble and Learned Lord, neither had he the power of saying anything to-day and then changing his whole tone to-morrow; for be himself bad heard him say, that those three slauties were the only ones worth caring for, and that the Bill would be nothing without them, yet what was now his language? The LORD CHANCELLOR said that the Noble Earl bad a very happy way of misrepresenting all that he had heard ; he would no t t a k e upon h im to say it was wilful misrepresentation, for he believed that the Noble Earl did believe all he had stated, but that did not make it the more true.--( Laughter.) Take one instance of his correctness —that report he had given of what had fallen from hi m (the Lord Chancellor). He had never said those three clauses were the best part of the Bill, for all that he bad said would lead any unprejudiced person to suppose that • (as he was in reality) adverse to those clauses, but had given in to them by compulsion. The House would, - from that sample of the Noble Lord's accuracy, judge of his correctness in other parts. He most strenuously denied that the Noble Earl (Grey) had ever once.even insinuated, that one of the Cabinet had written to the Lord Lieutenant against the Bill. That it was one connected with the Government was true, but not one of the Government. The Duke of WELLINGTON • also expressed his utter astonishment at the extraordinary declaration just shade, and his indignation at the position into which the House had, of consequence, been thrown. But a very short period had elapsed since the 'Noble • Earl 'lately at the head of affairs, when introducing this measure, stated his firm conviction that these clauses were sO tieeet§ary, that without them the bill Would be worse than useless--would be as unjust as impolitic; and the Noble and Learned Lord on the woolsack had warmly concurred in these expressions.. , ( Hear, heir.) That Noble and Letriled Lord would require a great deal more ingenuity than even he possessed and exercised-in the House, to persuade them that when he held up these clauses as proper and indis pensable, he did not think he 'should carry them in the House of Commons; btit fiuiv , because he found that Muse would not agree to them, he turned round and asserted that he had never approved of those clauses.—( Hear.). • He himself, the Noble Duke) was averse to any attempt, on the part of their Lordstipf, to thrust upon the MitilStry dity measure which they ad grounds for disapproving ; -but, at . the same time, he consider e d i t b ut proper, in return, that their Lordships should understand what those grounds were ___.(Hear, hear, hear I) A fortnight or so ago, the insertion of thesl clauses, was,Veheinetily dthnandetp now they,were to bi abandoned. Y e t Wh y ? The Lord lieutenant ot Ireland had sent over a vast deal of information on the subject, whence it appeared that outrage and crime in Ireland had beea di trec-fifths of the Whole ambnot; py the 410tation of 1116 Year—( Hear, hear)—and in four baronies which had been proclaimed, the amount of centage had been reduced almost to nothing. Every person who had been employed by Government in car r yi ng it into effect had declared that it had been Most beefiat stilt only there; hitt Government la /retail, the Magistr a t es , and the people themselves were most anxious to ,have it renewed—( Hear, hear, hear), but were generally of. opinion •that the omission of these clauses would destroy its effect. The renewal of-the Bill had accord ingly been propeacil by the late Noble Premier and the. Noble a n d Learnbd LBrd; 8t tip n - these elfauses As Indispensable; a Bill was agreed to, and went through two stages ; yet now came the Noble Viscount and intimated, not only that they should drop these clauses, but that they should Withdraw the introduction of the Bill froth that House, because, said; they; ' BtlBrt#ll6 et 610 iifftlid flee ~Houle of Calinai won't . agree to it"--(Hear, hear,. hear !) What I was the House of Lerch then to be reduced to such a state of degradation as this ,?—(Loud cheers from the Opposition.) Were they to be played with in this manner ? 'to be treated as but a sort of,board of to#ittration ?.,=.l( Renewed deers from the Opplitißti.) The important information got together with so mach care by the Lord Lieutenant went for whine— his opinion went for nothing, though stronger words could not have been made use of than those in which, on the 15th of April! he expressed his ?pinion in feitotii Of the renewal of this measure unimptittd. Ana in kigA expression of opinion th e N o bl e Vi ce - Foy was' supported byln well-disposed people in Ireland, who had derived the advantages which this measure gave, in restor ing security to life and property. Yet such a Bill its.thig te=as to be impaired in this manner, because,. the. able ViSeduitt said, there was reas , lo thirik the Rouge Would object to the *uses in question ! Why should' they suppose that ,House would reject the measure ? it was precisely the same which they had sent up to the House of Lords last year.—(Hear, hear.) It was said that the Noble Earl lately at the head of affairs had been thiarepreSented. (the D u k e of Wellington) would be the la s t man tb stiffs- represent or assent to the misrepresentation of any .Noblb Lord's observations ; but, certainly,. if, he reinenthered &AY thing, he did cl ear ly remem b er that Notre Earl statin to the House that a M em b er o f the Qtbinei---( Hear, hear s—had, without his privity, .nitren to the Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland, and I.te saised the Noble function ar y t o express t dette that these three clauses should be omitted ; that the Noble Viceroy had accordingly sent over to say that he could do without them, and that he (the Noble Earl) had at once and very properly, written over t o the Vi ceroy , desiring him to look at tlth qiles tion solely en Irish grounds, and quite abstractedly from Eng , lish politics--( Hear, hear)—and the Noble Earl had 000dluctO by expressing his determination to carry the Hill, and Insist upon the insertion of these clauses as a sine qua non.--( Hear, hear.) Yet was such a measure as this to be summarily with drawn, because, forsooth, it was imagined that a Majority of the Commons would not agree to it. If 'such a prireinle as this were to be instituted, he trenibled - ti?r the consequences. —(Cheers from the .Opposition.) He did not mean to say that he intendod to throw any difficulties in: the way of Mini sters in their progress with their Bill : they might bring for ward what measure they liked, and he would content himself with throwing upon them the whole of the responsibility, and lie warned them that great would that responsibility be.— ( Cheers.) • The Earl of LIMERICK protested against being gu id e d by what might be supp ose d t o b e th e opinion entertained on any bill in the other House. " Good God I (exclaimed his Lordship) are we come to this ? Arc we, in future, to be a mere house of registration for the other House ?—( Cheers from the Opposition.) We have been taunted and threatened with degradation, and this would be degradation indeed! At any rate, if this House is to be degraded, let us not seal its de gradation ourselves."—(Cheeis from the Opposition.) Lord MELBOURNE commenced in so low a tone, that for some time we could with difficulty catch the tenor of his observations. He said that he was very, sorry to find the ex treme difficulty of his position so enhanced by , the!ehement A 1 clamour raised against the very first legislative step he attempted; and he the more regretted it, as he had been most anxious to remove any grounds of complaint which might have beep raised against this Bill. A Noble Earl ( Wicklow) had attacked the Ministry in language, the unmeasured terms of which he (Lord Melbourne) should be very sorry to reciprocate. He had on former occasions told the Noble Earl that he should be very cautious how he took his standard of language from that adopted by the Noble Earl. Were he inclined to talk to the Noble. Earl in his. own language, he might tell him that he excused his intemperance, because he saw that he was under the influence of those two strongest of passions —mortified vanity, and disappointed ambition,—( Cheers from the Minis terial benches)—but he would content himself with assuring the Noble Earl that he did excuse his intemperance, without entering into the reasons for so passing it over. Having said thus much, however, he could not but say that it appeared to him that the course now adopted towards a new, and indeed unformed Ministry, was mast unusual ; and, to say the least of it, ungenerous. The more open and patriotic way would have been, to propose a vote for the removal of a Ministry described as so unworthy. With reference to the measure it self, he did not mean to say but that when it was first intro duced for a renewal, it had met with his concurrence as it stood ; and he had undoubtedly said he thought it prudent and expedient in that form.—( Loud cheers from the Oppo sition.) He did not wish to deny this ; but the circumstances were now altered ; for when it came out, no matter how, that the Lord Lieutenant was of opinion he could maintain tranquillity in Ireland without these clauses, he would put it to the House whether it would be proper or justifiable to force such clauses upon an unwilling agent, who thus expressed hia readiness and ability to keep peace and tranquillity without the aid of any such extraordinary powers.—( Hear, hear, hear.) This expression of opinion, too, en the part of such high au thority, had of course had its effect on the public mind, on the minds of many members of the Legislature, and of certain members of the recent administration ; and he had thought it right to bring in a bill which should be in conformity with the opinion of the majority. It would hardly be contended that the opinion of that majority should be held as nothing.— ( Cheers.) This was the whole of the case ; and he now called upon them, in the name of their Sovereign and of the country, for their support, countenance, and co-operation. No one felt more strongly than hi mse lf the responsibility of Mi= nisters for their measures; and he could assure the House, that if the omission of these clauses should have the effect of producing the threatened evils, and of nullifying the beneficial intent of the bill, if matters came again to a head, if the Lord Lieutenant should find, contrary to ex pectation, that he could not govern Ireland without the powers given in these clauses, then, and in that case, the House and country might rest assured, that if this Administration remained in office, they would advise their Sovereign to call a Parlia ment together—if none should be sitting—and throw them selves upon that Parliament for the additional powers neces• sary to meet the exigencies and difficulties of the case.— ( Cheers. ) Lord WHARNCLIFFE intimated, as we understood, his intjtion, on the second reading of the Bill being proposed, to call for the production of all the correspondence on the subject. The Duke of BUCKINGHAM was so extremely ener getic, as to be at times unintelligible. He said that the pro ceedings of Ministers were most reprehensible, for they acted one way, although the House had their own words for acting another. With regard to the words which were alleged to have been used the other evening by the Noble Earl late at the head of his Majesty's Government, he (the Duke of Buck ingham) certainly understood the Noble Earl to say that he had been deceived by a member of the Cabinet.—( Cries of " No, no," from the Ministerial side of the House.) The Noble Earl certainly said that confidence had been be trayed, by holding communications with the agitator of Ireland, on a subject which was then under the consideration of Government. That communication had been made by the Right Hon. Secretary for Ireland, with the concurrence of the Chancellor of the Exchequer ; and though that Noble Lord had, in consequence of the apprehended impossibility of carrying the bill in question through the other House, after the occurrences which had taken place, resigned his office, he had resumed the same office in the short space of eight days, because he was now supported by the same men who then threatened to oppose him. The Noble and Learned Lord on tie woolsack seemed very desirous of correcting the speeches of other Noble Lords. He (the Duke of Buckingham) would say, let the Noble and Learned Lord recollect his own speeches on this subject, and correct himself. The Hon. and Learned Member for Dublin might now be said to be the Go vernor of Ireland. The Noble and Learned Lord on the wool sack, and his colleagues, might think that they had buried the Noble Earl late at their head, in his political sepulcre ' and that he would no more disturb them ; b u t they would find themselves mistaken. The spirit of the Noble Earl would burst its cerement, and haunt them in their festivities, and dis- turb the " potations pottle deep " of the Noble and Learned Lord. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE and the LORD CHANCELLOR here rose at the same time, but the former gave way. The LORD CHANCELLOR—Stop a minute. As to the concluding observations of the Noble Duke, all I shall say is, that I do not frequent the same cabaret or alehouse, as he does; at all events, I do not recollect having met the Noble Marquis at his potations. I have not a slang dictionary at hand --- The Marquis of BUTE—I rise to order. The Noble and Learned Lord is completely out of order. Several other NOBLE LORDS, amidst great confusion, also called out, " Order, order." The Duke of BUCKINGHAM—I wish the Noble and Learned Lord to proceed. The LORD CHANCELLOR remained for some time on his legs, as if anxious to proceed. Several Noble Lords still cried out " Order, order ;" and the greatest confusion prevailed on the Opposition side of the House. The LORD CHANCELLOR then resumed his seat. The Marquis of BUTE—I rise to order, not only from re spect to the House, but from respect to both the Noble Lords themselves, as it is likely that in the heat of the moment they may give utterance to language which they would afterwards regret. lam sure they will both see that it is with the most friendly feelings towards them that I wish to put an end to this altercation. The LORD CHANCELLOR—The Noble Marquis would certainly hate been more deserving of my thanks if he had allowed me to sit down, which was just about to do at the time, without interfering at all. With regard to the con cluding observation of the Noble Duke— ' The Marquis of LONDONDERRY—I rise to order. - The LORD CHANCELLOR—This, my Lords, is cer tainly not the way to keep order. , • The Marquis of LONDONDERRY—I maintain, my Lords, that the Noble and Learned Lord is out of order. • (The greatest confusion now prevailed in . the House.) The LORD CHANCELLOR—My Lords, this is unfair. Noble Lords on this side of the House (pointing to the oppo sition benches) listen with the greatest attention to-the attack, and yet they refuse to hear one word in defence. Lord LONDONDERRY—Speak in explanation: The LORD CHANCELLOR (with much emphasis); I tell the Noble Lord :that lam speaking in explanation. If the Noble Duke meant, as I am .persuaded ho did moan, the language he made. use of,' only . as. a joke I urn perfectly willing to take it as such : but if he meant it to be understood as a fact, thereby intending the thing as a personal imputation,. then, say, that nothing could, be more incorrect—nothing dould be further from the truth. The Duke of BUCKINGHAM-1 meant the observation merely as a joke. I was only making use of the language of ghdltiptMte, in his tragedy of Hamlet. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE then rose ; but his first few observations were inaudible in the gallery. He did not rise for the purpose of answering the various misstatements which had been made by the-Noble Duke (Wellington) in'the spedeii Which he lied Made ; but would reserve himself to reply to the still Imager speech which the Noble Duke had promised their Lordships when the measure, with the alterations which had been proposed, should be regularly before the House. As, however, he had heard what had been said by his Noble Friend, Into at the head of his Majesty's Government, in the speech to which soil frequent reference had that evening been mat i o r and as he had been 'a witness to the unfounded allega tion' which had been made against his Noble Friend—an alle gation that the Noble Earl had . on that occasion said he had been betrayed by a Member of the C; t ::7_ , t--he C . ould not re main silent; but must meet that allegation by a aeL. 4 ." 4 c°ll - The Noble Earl had never made use of the language Imputed to him. He. had never used the words " been ,betrayed ; ', at ;, nor aia he say he had been de 13V, tl thinthai the eibinet. In the speech of his Noble. Friend on the occasion q4109t194-4 A . pOefh never to be forgotten—certainly, at least, never to De !f."l3,'Citten by him (the -Marquis of Lansdowne), for, but for that speech, he should not have continued to hold the situation cL which he then AlleAn that ,§peedh, ue repeeted. no such terms Were made use of; for,. if the Noble Earl had said that bekit I.3efriiod hi a Meniber of the Cabinet, lie (the Marquis of Lansdowne) would never h 5.% eatic.;ented i 6 fenittin in office with a person guilty of such conduct ; and nothing but the most perfect satisfaction, not only that such language had not been made use of b; the Noble Ea r l, b u t th a t it cou ld not, With truth, have td6ii app'lie" dan Member of the Ca.. binet, would even now induce him (the Marquis of Lanstiottne) to continue to sit in that Cabinet. He would now, with their Lordships' perm,isgion, Say a feel words, and they .ivould be very iew, in reference to the alterations which it was pia: posed to make in the bill which had given rise to this discus su:l4. Though be had been silent when the measure was in tio Gee ' by Noble Friend late at the head of his Majesty's Government, into their Lordships' House, and though be bad said nothing DA tht nilleCt since, he &ily coneniteu With his r to: rilend and colleagues, that that measure was necessary, indispensably necessary, for the maintenance of peace and tranquillity in Ireland. Though he had been hitherto silent on the subject, he would not, he repeated ; den" that he attached as much importance to the measure as his noble .Friend, or any of his colleague§ Heir, heart) But though thus satisfied at the time of the iiedeiiity tit the measure, he mast now, in the altered cfrettitstantea tlf the case, consider what would be the best course for the Government and the Legislature to pursue. An indiscretion had been committed by. the Betita tary for Ireland, by the communication he had made to a Mem hpr of the other House of Parliament ; and in consequence of the disclosures which had thus been made, his Noble Friend the Chancellor of the Eichequer found it would be difficult to get the Bill, as it then stood, through the other House. Let him (the Marquis of Lansdowne) as!'z their Lordships whether, und er ex i st i ng circumstances, it w9ul4 'Le sufficient if the Bill w ere got thro ug h t h e C ommons b y a bare majority ? He would put it to the Noble Lords, whether, when they re fleeted on the whole extent of the indiscretion which had been cominitted,• and the dislike to such measures to which it must necessarily.give rise in the other House—and he must say Memberi. 41 , , that he rather reverenced the feeling than c , ntilemned would put it to Noble Lords, whether, in these' circumstances, it would not be better to eocleavour to carry ovr the Govern ment of Ireland without the extraordinary powetrit which the Bill was intended to confer upon .t? But when he said that he reverenced the feeling which woOd give rise to an oppo. sition to the Bill as it at present stood in the °the 'r House of Parliament, let him not be misunderstood. He wished Noble Lords to understand, that if the expectation enter tained by the other House, that more limited powers would suffice for the exigencies of the case, should' turn . oat 'to be unfounded ; and the Lord Lieutenant ,of Ireland should find it impracticable, with the existing br,ws, to main tain peace and tranquillity in that country, eithea• in eo n t o _ quence of the revival of associations, or from 0t,...er causes, then, he would let his Majesty be advised to call narliament together, at whatever time the necessity should arise, And ask for enlarged powers, to maintain order and tranquillity in Ire land. He would sanction such advice to his Majesty, in the full confidence that the same reformed Parliament which was now sc. jealous for the liberties and privileges of the people, would at once, on being called together, and the necessity being evi dent, grant the additional powers which his Majesty would ask of them. They would do this with the utmost confidence in his Government, and in the determination that the peace of Ireland should be preserved. And he was sure that. not only would the Reformed Parliament, in such an exigency, grant his Majesty those ample additional powers which were neces sary to put down disturbances in Ireland, bat they would also grant the powers necessary to put down th e causes of those disturbances. It was, he repeated, in this comMence, and, with this determination taken, that he gave his consent to the with. drawal of the clauses in question. If it should be found, next year, that those clauses were rendered necessary by anything that then existed, or had previously occurred, then these clauses could be restored. He (the Marquis of Lansdowne) wished to see the causes of agitation in Ireland done away, as well as the effects.—( Ironical cheers from the Opposition Pet"rs.) Ho would only say, in conclusion, that it was, the duty of Govern ment to remove the causes of evils, as well as. %he evils themselves. The Marquis of SALISBURY made one or two observa tions which were altogether inaudible in the gallery. The Marquis of LONDONDERRY said that the Noble Marquis who- had just addressed their Lordships was guilty of great inconsistency in regard to this measure. Ho had completely changed his opinions on it. in the space of ten days. - The- Noble Earl, late at the head of - his Majesty's Government, had fallen- a sacrifice to the base intrigues of some of-his colleagues •in _reference to this measure.. Lord Althorp, whose resignation led to that of the Noble Earl, was the first to suggest that a communication should be made to 11r. O'Connell of the intention of Ministers with regard to the revival of this Bill. That Lord had since accepted office. His. conduct, therefore, was altogether inexplicable, and he would never be able to justify himself to the country. The Noble Earl, In.:. at the head of his Majesty's Government, had been completely town overboard by his friend that evening. He (the Marquis of Londonderry) regretted that the Noble Earl was not present to witness their Lordships' proceedings. The people of this country would have no confidence in the new Administration. They would say it was a miserable patched up piece of work. The LORD CIIANCELLC. I II then moved that the House do adjourn. Lord ELLENBOROUGH wished,. before the adjourn ment of the House, to put one question to the Noble Viscount opposite. Both the Noble Viscount and the NoiAe and Learned Lord on the woolsack had spoken in no very me,:qmred terms of the conduct of the Secretary for Ireland in reference to the communications to Mr. O'Connell. What he therefore wished to ask the Noble Viscount was, whether Mr. Littleton was still in office. Lord MELBOURNE had great pleasure in being able to answer the question of, the Noble Baron in the affirmative. The Noble Baron was incorrect in saying that he had spoken of the. Secretary for Ireland in harsh terms. What he was blamed for was the extent of the information he communicated to Mr. O'Connell, and not for the mere circumstance of mak ing the communication. Mr. O'Connell was a member of the other branch of the legislature, and therefore was entitled to some knowledge of the intentions of Government with reference to the bill in question ;_and what, h e re p ea t e d, h e bl ame d hi m for, was the extent, and not the fact, of the communication. Lord ELLENBORO UGH said that, in that respect, the Noble Viscount differed from the Noble Earl late at the head of his Majesty's Government. The Noble Earl said that no communication whatever ought to have been made to Mr. O'Connell. He (Lord Ellenborough) thought that Mr. Lit tleton had been extremely ill used in this affair. For several days he had lain under the imputation that he had made that communication of himself, and unknown to any member of his Majesty's Government, whereas it now appears it was with the concurrence, and at the special request, of the Chancellor of the Exchequer that he made it.—( Hear, hear," from the Opposition Peers.) The whole blame rested on that Noble Lord ( Althorp). The heaviest charge which could be brought against Mr. Littleton was, that he did not inform the Noble Earl then at the head of the Government of having made that communication. But though he had not mentioned the circum stance to the Noble Earl, he had mentioned it to the Chan cellor of the Exchequer, and he would naturally expect that he would have told the circumstance to the Noble Earl. The LORD CHANCELLOR. denied having spoken in harsh terms of Mr. Littleton, in the same way as that . gentle man had done of himself. • He had admitted that he committed an indiscretion in commttnicating at :4•11 with Mr. O'Connell, which was exactly the purport of what lie (the Lord Chancel , lor) had said. He did not think,that his 'Noble Friend, lately at the head of the Government, said anything of the mere fact of Mr. Littleton having communicated with Mr. O'Connell : what he complained of was, the extent of the communication which he made to him. His (the Lord Chancellor's) opinion was, that Government ought to communicate, through their leader in the Houie of Commons,- with Members of that House as to their intentions with respect to particular measures; and such he knew was not only the opinion but the practice under former Governments. When he was in the other House, Mr. Canning, Lord Castlereagh, and Mr. Percival, were in the habit of so communicating with him, though he was in politi cal hostility with all of these men, and with something ap proaching to personal hostility with one of them. He recol lected that he and Mr. Percival had a communication together respecting some important Government measure , the very day before the lamented death of Mr. Perci va l. I n fact, ,it would be impossible to carry on Government without such communi cations with Members of the other House of Parliament. The Marquis of LONDONDERRY wished to ask the Noble and Learned Lord on the woolsack whether his Majesty' s . speech at the opening of the session did not represent Mr. O'Connell as the cause of the agitation in Ireland? The LORD CHANCELLOR did not recollect that his Majesty's speech represented Mr. O'Connell as the author or cause of the agitation in lieland ; but this he recollected per fectly well, that his Majesty's 'speech said no such thing._ ( Loud laughter.) The LORD CHANCELLOR then again moved the adjournment of the House, on which The Duke of BUCKINGHAM said that part of the words of the Noble Earl, late at the head of the Government, to which reference had so often beep made that evening, was, that a Member of the GoVernment had placed confidence in a. person in whom no confidence ought to be placed. A NOBLE LORD, whose name we could not learn, said.that the Noble Earl had, on the occasion in question, said that the communication to Mr. O'Connell was made without his knevvledge ; and that if he had known it, he ,would have pre ventecLit. He would support the bill in its present shape. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE explained: In speaking of Mr. Littleton, he had merely made use of that gentleman's own expressions. Lord ELLENBOROUGH said that was often very un just and ungenerous, as a person 'vas frequently led to speak of himself in more severe and condemnatory terms than the occasion warranted. The LORD CHANCELLOR then moved the adjourn ment of the House a third time, which was agreed to at a quarter to eight. After the House was formally adjourned, the Marquis of LONDONDERRY rose and spoke for a short time, but the noise occasioned by the Noble Lords leaving the House ren dered it impossible to catch anything of what he said in the gallery. HOUSE OF COMMONS, July 17. The SPEAKER resumed the Chair at 20 minutes past ,five 'clock, when there was an extremely full attendance of MEggAgE•FROM THE 'LORDS. A message from the Lorea was brought up, stating that their Lordships had agreed to the . ellimneysweepers' Regula tion Bill and some private Bills. THE ADMINISTRATION. Lord ALTIIORP, upon being called upon by the SPEAKER, rose, and was received with lloud cheers. The Noble Lord . said, I ..wii: take the opporttinity of _ moving for a, new w rit f or th e purpose of stating to the Hotist; that my Noble Friend (Lord Melbot: rrie) has been commissioned , by his Majesty to lay before bin: the plan of' an Administration, that he has completed his arlZug eme nts, and has reconstructed an Administration. The aa,',. itions that have been made to the Administration are, that Lord Dunci:.qu'r has accepted the office of Secretary for the Home Department, and Sir John Hobhouse has accepted the Woods and Forests in the place of Lord Duncannon.—(Cheers.) Therefore, as far as addition goes, the alteration is not considerable, but un doubtedly the alteration is great, very, great indeed, in the loss of the services of my Noble Friend .Lord Grey.—(Loud cheers.) ' And it is impossible foi• me to disguise the fact that the Cabinet, now that Lord Grey has c eased to preside eve: ne theceovrewdr. ahnowcl whole eo u p i e v,d r : i t o hh d av : me f y, c e iou4iwt , Its councils, has not so great a claim as it previously had to the Noble Friend upon both public confidence of the House. It is equally i m possible for me to express my regret at the loss of my i a t li i d lenl personal i:e: . 1,., g, have_ ro e un d , my poli ticalNOble "-;end's views and' opinions ; from the earliest pew , rn a Member of this House, w have- `Y, fotinly acted toix. , --: !- • -en with the .-;: , 2: ‘*^‘''''," - \`"'' :ae.ct:dpanudirni During dffitid it it ad h net 0 , -- • nog •T-7 . 4t , i)t,_ Rta)s, %-, • i 1 the faniatioit ot the -.•-":„ zFmea . /..5 , ' e" • :pttO 43 in hint n , ~, .4A . • ~,' itt0g,..... , often stated that nothing egtiitt ~, . ~,, ,e -Is -_,,,gite 0., ,W 0 apt,, , 5 c ,..,: i office, but the bopemOgna.,• ~, , 4 '" *bleb iseasluges ~', ,j -, , z of great publi i .l3%,ta , .;`,, s iit At ' .4.) :eyjk&lnt,. o se4 ~ o , 1 .4.10 under the admitnitta 'in,o.ticA t i x 14j e - o icyf Ot i piiks, , .`7 ,- P , m acy, from my political conlieeten Nlitetiii \- IP : s ''' ~eczkc il i4 3, . 1155 incr cage ( " lll § Rtniabl? (lispositiod‘luka p tei .. 4 92 'z''; every one connected Ail Mitt the y stronOsls?affefbt i kke\ -\ I know no one /rho possesses • l' l4lf in a 113.. degreeAlwqta-, 0 \,. . .40,' l't * . I 'i - - - '• n effe t: ' les nece§tiry to produce such a _,_,t - , ai my,, .., I feel the highest admiration tat -....,, :ie , 01 tv szifra:* ~, esteem for lus s traigL4'W 7 P ( 4 2' :l4l,eftllY tt t t . , 4 ,C j . 4 4 —(Loud, m kQe zingW iii r.. k ie.A, tVd5: '',.; , :.1. eit, o l:-...: '_ and nz _ a ef oliga ~. io , 6 4 0 4 ,,At4pr z y, ..,, . 3 ? ~,, , 1 ,, , ,, con* ki - cr t lievq .ft , ....,s , .-: 4- `. T''' (1 7 e r'S'• S' <A) i';,.- , 4• q. 6--. ?!..p,z „ ..-.4 , ,, l!, 4 b , ; ( 1. ? e',,.°. ' ,If - " -4*1.. ,..1t-'4 , rr g eg , c . ;-,,, , . -4' - "" , -. 4'? Loll 4 .--R-',..z At -- , 47g.R., ,, , PA,..tv- z ; .2 4' c''l , 7 440 d ul bur