The Sun. — London, England, 1834-06-07 00:00:00

-j/ y e rg's"‘ ' iitt -- ,t', ._. _ ..... ~,„„,,,, _ ft „ . . 2„. . ._ ..•0. -.4 • . A I Atn . Jo ~..- .ii, IP ' I - I , 4 )- At , - , ,----1; .'4144 1 11 ) i,- * i. ' l l kit • tr ifff 5, o , 4til t , d,,#;4 1) It. t ~e Se** 1 . 114 1*111 ...'11... . bit Ik . "1 1 1. H E SECOND EDITION of the NAU TICAL ALMANAC, for 1834, will be ready for delive ry Mott lay. n:lurray, Albemarle-street. This day wrpiblit , ie rust Bro., Its., A ?NEW EDITION OF ÜBBLES FROM THE BRUNNENS. John Murray, Albemarle-street. TO INTENDED PURCHASERS. ESTIMATES made for intended Purchasers of Annuities, Lifehold, Leasehold, Reversionary, or other Property, to know what sum to give to produce a certai n rate per cent. Legacy Duties made out and set tled —T. Cooper, Accountant, No. 1, Harleston-place , Albany -road, near 0 d Kent-road. Letters per post to be ROYAL HOTEL,GEORGE'S-SQUAR E, GLASGOW. WILLIAM MENZI ES respectfully an nounces to the Nobility, Gentry, and the Public s ner allY, that he has opened that exte nsive and splendid t ablishtnent on the North Side of George's-square, and corner of North Hanover-street, Glasgow, known by the Il k'ne of the Royal Hotel. This establishment is peculiarly commodious ; the fur 4,3hing of the best possible description ; the suites of f t %ins for rivate families elegant, convenient, and com fttable ; and the situation one of the most airy and retired 44 the c ity ; the Royal Hotel, being , in all respects, equal ~, any establishment in the west of Scotland. A large room is appropriated exclusively to commercial gentlemen ; and extensive Stabling and a Coach-house are 441 nediately contiguous to the Hotel. Prom his long experience in the line, and his deter t4ination to omit nothing which can promote the comfort convenience of his visiters, W. M. hopes to merit a Shar e of public patronage. Cold, and Shower Baths. STEAM. rRE ST. GEORGE STEAM PACKET COMPANY'S VESSELS SAIL regularly as ti nder :- 1 , ,,Pr0m LONDON for PLYMOUTH, CORK, and LI -1,„.,..Q.P00L, calling at PORTSMOUTH, every SA TURDAY MORNING, at Nine o'clock, retuning from Cor k on Saturdays, and Plymouth on Mondays. From LONDON or EXETER, calling off Deal, Ryde , ... Cowes (weather pp -milting), every WEDNESDAY "`ORNISG, at Nine o'clock, returning on Saturdays. From HULL for GOTTENBURG, with his Majesty's ktil, every WEDNESDAY, returning on Tueesdays. Pr om fIULL for HAMBURG, every ten days. Pr om LIVERPOOL for CORK every TUESDAY a nd SATURDAY, returning Tuesdays anti Fridays. „Prom LIVERPOOL for DUNDALK and NEWRY " , ree times a fortnight. Fr om LIVERPO for BANGOR ever TUES "AY, THURSDA Y, and SATURDAY, y returning i ‘loodays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. t Pra m CORK for DUBLIN every WEDNESDAY, re aTing Saturdays. Fr om CORK for WATERFORD and DUBLIN every r F RIDAY, return:ni Tuesdays. Fro m DUBL IN for NEWRY an d GLASGOW ever y FR IDAY returning Tuesdays. F rom c ,„ u BRISTOL for DUBLIN, WATERFORD, and 1 1K, every TUESDAY a n d SATURDAY, returning T uesday s and Fridays. , Inf orma ti on o btai ne d at t h e C ompany ' s O ffi ce, 137 , !'eadenhall-street, London. INVALID WHEEL CHAIRS and CHIL DREN'S CARRIAGES, for SALE or HIRE, the latter from 10s. each, the greatest assortment, of studied ee, neatnes, and drability, in their construction, is at GRAINI s Furniture Warehouse, 29, City-road, ne ar Finsbury -square. Also, an extens i ve c olection of Garden Seats, and 41ower Stands. B. A second-hand Pony Phaeton for Sale. I ` I nrERAL SUCCEDANEUM FOR FILLING DE CA - YED TEETH, without Heat or Pressure, and IN CORRODIBLE ARTIFICIAL TEETH, FIXED ATHOUT WIRES OR OTHER LIGATURES. ONSIEUR MALLAN and SONS, Sur geon-Deutists, No. 32 GREAT RUSSELL "I REET, BLOOMSBURY, , grateful for the high and ~Itensive patronage which has so eminently distinguished Mtheir professional exertions since their arrival in the British etropolis, respectfully announce to their Friends and the bli e in general, that they still continue to restore DE ‘i,,AYED TEETH, with th e i r ce l e b ra t e d MINERAL') p CCEDANEUNI, so universally recommended by the Toth of London and Pali,- The operation of Filling 'eeth i s performed in a few seconds, without the slightest !` l , o n, heat, or pressure. They also FASTEN LOOSE WH OLE in a manner singularly.e ffi cacious, and SUPPLY the"ROLE or PARTIAL SETS of TEETH formed of a bove INCORRODIBLE MINERAL, or of Natural %Nuances, without WIRE or other LIGATURES— Porantecd to answer every purpeae for Articulating and Asticstinz Th e - s esero Faculty are respectfully iavited-to witness the sup- . N 1 result of the Mineral Succedaneum. 44 /3 One of the above firm may be consulted at 46, Chester reet, Liverpool ; and 36, Mosely-street, Man , Charges as in Paris. ROYAL EXTRACT OF FLOWERS.- 1 ,, The extraordinary circulation of the above article, aT d 43 very general adoption by . the first ranks of Fashion, t he Toilette and in the Drawing-room, have stimulated Proprietors in an endeavour to render it, in delicacy . of tit and fragrance, equal, if not superior, to any descrip "4 of Perfume for the Handkerchief. It is distilled from combination of flowers, selected for their excelling !:eetness and aromatic properties, when those Flowers are ti their fullest vigour. Manufactured and sold by Rigge, Brockbank, and ;17,ge, Perfumers to the Royal Family, 35, New Bond "Peet, in Bottles of 155., Bs. ss. and 3s. 6d. the he PERSIAN BOUQUET is also recommended to notic e of the nobility and gentry,as a pleasing, very r''' 4 "erful, and durable Perfume. PROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZETTE. ST. JAMES'S-PALACE, JUNE 5, 1834. The King was this day pl ease d to con f er t h e h onour o f ~ .tiighthood upon Colon e l H enry King, Companion of the rat Honourable Military O r d er o f t h e B at h , Mili tary ,Vnight Commander of the Royal Hanoverian Guelphic ier, and Lieutenant-Governor of the island of Heligo qud. CROWN-OFFICE, JUNE 5. IRRNIBIULS RETURNED TO SERVE IN THIS PRESENT TA RLIAMENT. .k r rir OF EDINBURGH. — Sir John Campbell, Knt., his prtiesty's Attorney- General, in the room of the Right Hon. es t a iltis Jeffrey, who has accepted the office of a Lord of ` 13.4 and Commissioner of the High Court of Justiciary Scotland.ix " si ns, RlcT OF BURGHS OF LEITH, PORTOBELLO, AND ray ' hi s ul uaon.—The Right Hon. John Archibald Mur - M ajesty's Advocate for Scotland. The Lord WHITEHALL, MAY 29. Chancellor has appointed William Henry Ce, of Birmingham, in the county of Warwick, Gent., c as be a Master Extraordinary in the High Court of —4ance ry . T he Lord Chancellor has also appointed John Clement 1 71 d Kynnersley, of Utt oxeter, i n the county of Stafford, Aerit., to be a Master Extraordinary in the High Court of \4l ltri eery. The Lord Chancellor has also appointed James Brown 'oet e , younger, of Lymington, i n t h e county of Warwick, Attit., to be a Master Extraorlinary in the High Court of 'oancery. WAR-OFFICE, JUNE 6. h e 4 th Regiment of Light Dragoons—Cornet J. Vernon to Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Blake, who retires ; H. ~7** George Priaulz, Gent., to be Cornet , by purchase, 'co Vernon, June 6. C ornet, Light Dragoons—G. G. Swinton , Gent., to be by Purchase ' v.ce R ,se, who retires , June 6 . Light ti ro , nz_Li it. G. W. Key , from the 1 6th Light - --..g" -- oo'n ° : to be Lieutenant , v.ce Jones, who exchanges, J un . 6. ' , .18th L:ght Dr agoon Light Dragoons, to s--- Lieut.l . M. Jones, from the 15th changes, June 6. be Lieutenant, vice Key, who ex -sth Foot—Major Lord C•Wellesley, from half-pay Un ettaehed, to be Major, v ' h es re 16th Foot—Ensig n T . n .-e. 6 . Crawford to be Lieutenant, with out purchase, vice Archer, deceased, Jan. 14; Gentleman . 'idet Morris F. Ximenes, 1(... from the Royal {nary Col "Se to be Ensign, vice Crawford, June 11 11 34 th Foot—Captain J. Wakefield tbeie.F. tehase, vice Crotty, deceased ; Li to Major, without tk Ptain, vice Wakefield, May 27 ; Ensign ijitz?..eesrlailed fromto be i i .Le 45th Foot, to be Lieutenant vice FitzG ald ' ' Frase r Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, er ; 2 Lneas wh o . , vice Stretch, 4n,etires, June 6. por - jill'oot—Ensigoo H. T. Bowen to be Lieutenant, by to hir, c, vice Child, who retires ; J. P. Maxwell, Gent., - ,5 E nsign, by purchase, vice Bowen, June 6. I,iltathryFocoot--lieGentleman Cadet R. .Bates, from the novel 1 4eslie - ge, to be Ensign, without purchase, vice 65th' Koonzoted in the 39th Foot, June 6. out purchase, Lieut. A. W. Casson to be Captain, with- W. Butler t o . ' r, Butler, appointed Paymaster ; Capt. 6 -th Foot --_A s . aYmaster, vice Bates, deceased , June 6. hom the Staff, to I: e tant-Sur geon C . H. C arneg y. M.D., exchanges, June 6. Ass-s tant-Surgeon, vice Burton, who 70th Foot—Lieut. A. teched, to be Lieutenant, Gerard, from half-pay Unat ruert, appointed to the 78t ry,ing the differenLe, vice La 78th Toot—Lieut. J. R. Lamers°°t June 6. to be Lieutenant, vice R. M , Bea , from the 70th Foot, P 4 ZYttattached, re :eiving the dilft 'r who retires upon half "utb Foot—Ensign E. T. E to enu.e, June 6. Y u to be :Lieutenant, by (No. 13,024.1 purchase, vice Romilly, promoted ; E. J. Thackwell, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Eyton, June 6. UNATTACHED. Lieut. F. Romilly, from the 90th Foot, to be Captain of Infantry, by purchase, June 6. HOSPITAL STAFF.—Assistant-Surgeon E. W. Bur ton, from the 69th Foot, to be Assistant-Surgeon to the Forces, vice Carnegy, who exchanges, June 6. MEMORANDA.—Second Captain C. D. Maitland, half pay Royal Artillery, has been allowed to retire from the service, by the sale of an unattached commiss'on, June 6. The exchange between Lieut. Butler of the 62d Foot, and Lieut. Irvine, half-pay 3d Foot, as stated in the Gazette of the 21st February last, has not taken place. The Christian names of Ensign Milne, of the 2d Foot, are Constantine Hamlyn, and not James George Duncan, as stated in the Gazette of the 23d ultimo. MrmoßANnum.—T l e tlalf-pay of the under-mentioned officers has been cancelled from the 6th instant, inclusive, upon their receiving a commuted allowance for their com missions : Brevet Lieut.-Colonel G. A. Didrich von During, Cap tain half-pay Ist Line Battalion King's German Legion ; Lieut. Hon E. S. Jerningham, half-pay Unattached ; Capt. W. Lyons, half-pay 6th Garrison Battalion ; Capt. Lieut. B. Vincent, half-pay Royal African Corps; Ensign G. P. Kerby, half-pay Incorporated Militia Battalion of Upper Canada ; Capt. Vincent Odiardi, half-pay Royal Corsican Rangers : The under-mentioned officers have also been allowed to retire from the Serviet, receiving commuted allowances, June, 6 : Quastermaster W. Collins, of the 85th Foot ; Quarter master T. Berry, of the 99th Foot. DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY. JOHN NORMAN, grocer, Dorking, Surrey. BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. WILLIAM TILSLEY and "WYTHEN JONES, bankers, Newtown, Montgomeryshire. BANKRUPTS WILLIAM KEY, linen-draper, Isleworth, Middlesex, to surrender June 19, at half-past twelve, and July 18, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Jones, Size-lane, Bucklersbury ; Graham, official assignee, Copthall-build ing JAMES NEWMAN, jun., corn-factor, Mark-lane, June 17, at one, and July 18, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Groom, Abchurch-lane, official assignee ; Atkins, Mildred's-court, Poultry. SAMUEL PRUJEANE WRIGHT, painting-brush manufacturer, Christopher-street, Hatton-garden, June 16, at one, and July 18, at eleven, at the Court of Bank ruptcy. Bolton, Austin-friars; Waithman, Basinghall street, official assignee. JOHN WATSON, music-dealer, Calthorp-street, Gray's Inn-road, June 13, at twelve, and July 18, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Green, King's Arms-yard,. Coleman-street, official assignee ; Hudson, King-street, Cheapside. FRANCIS METFORD, mealman, Bath, June 14, at eleven, and July 18, at one, at the Christopher Inn, Bath. Cook, Bath. THOMAS BARKER, tanner, Sutton Saint Edmunds, Lincoln, June 17 and July 18, at eleven, at the Peacock Inn, Boston. Bonner, Spalding; Williams, Verulam buildings, Gray's Inn, London. CHARLES P RIT CHA RD upholsterer, Bath, June 23, and July 18, at eleven, at the White Hart Inn, Bath. Frowd, Essex-street, Strand, London; Cruttwell and Sons, Bath. RICHARD GORE, merchant, Liverpool, June 18 ind July 18, at eleven, at the Clarendon rooms, Liver pool. flampson, Manchester ; Holden, Liverpool; Ad lington, Gregory, and Faulkner, Bedford-row, London. WILLIAM ALEXANDER OMANN and JAMES COLQUHOUN KEMP, merchants, Liverpool, June 18 and July 18, at one, at the Clarendon-rooms, Liverpool. Alawd.ley, Doran's-lane, Lord-street, Liverpool ; Adling ton, Gregory, and Faulkner, Bedford-row, London. JOSEPH LAWLESS, commission-agent, Manchester, June 17, at one, and July 18, at ten, at the Commis sioner's-rooms, Manchester. Makinson, Manchester ; Adlington, .gregory, and Faulkner, Bedford-row, London. BARON DAVIES, clothes-dealer, Manchester, June 20, at ten, and July 18,. at two, at the Commissioners' Rooms, Manchester. Seddon, Manchester ; Johnson and Wetherall, Temple, London. THOMAS TURKINGTON and THOMAS WIN LAW, tin-plate workers, Leeds, June 18 and July 18, at twelve, at the Commercial-buildings; Leeds. Battye, Fisher, and Sudlow, Chancery-lane, London; Hargreaves, Leeds. DIVIDENDS. E. T. Waters, merchant, Old South Sea-house, June 23, lt eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy—W. Reid and W. Stephens, merchants, Great George-street, Tower-hill, June 23, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Parker, ,:ork-cutter, lioundsditch, June 30, at half-past one, at the Court of Bankruptcy— G. Lamport, salesman, Newgate market, June 30, at half-past twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Cooper and J. Reader, woolstaplers, Stroud, June 27, at half-past twelve, at the Court of Rankruptcy —G. Betts, upholsterer, Charles-street, Grosvenor-square, June 27, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Jameson, victualler, Duke-street, Man chester-square, June 27, at two, at the Court of Bank ruptcy Jesse Parker, victualler, Webber-row, St. George's, Southwark, June '27, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Jacob and W. Jacob, merchants, Newgate street, June 27, at. twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy— G. Haynes, victualler, Trinity-street, Southwark, June 30, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy—W. Barnard, underwriter, Lloyd's Coffee-house, City, June 30, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. CERTIFICATES.—JUNE 27. T. Butt, bootmaker, Hedge-row, Islington—W. Nay lor, glass-manufacturer, Mortimer-street, Cavendish square—W. Barber, grocer, Gray's Inn-lane and Hack ney—J. Johnson, glass and lead-merchant, Norwich—P. Fryer, cotton spinners and manufacturers, Barton-upon- Irwell, Eccles, Lancashire—W. Boys, wine-merchant, Eastbourne, Sussex—S. Shepherd, wine-merchant, Up per Bryanston-street, Portman-square—J. Edgecumbe, cooper, Walcot, Somersetshire—H. T. Rogers, printer, Halifax, Yorkshire—W. Thompson, provision -dealer, Bir mingham. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. J. Brooks and Elizabeth Rose, surgeon-dentists, Liver pool—S. H. Wichello and G. Hanson, parchment-manu facturers, Thame, Oxfordshire—S. Tanner and E. Red dick, dressmakers, Cheapside—W. W a lli s an d S. W r i g ht, ironmongers, Oxford-street—W. P. Williams and J. P. Williams, linendrapers-, Stonehouse, Devonshire—T. Read and J. Read, wine-merchants, Bath and Cheltenham— W. Hewett and C. J. Edmonds, surgeons and apotheca ries, East Ilsley, Berkshire—Sarah Slatter and Lucy Slat ter, mercers, Winchcomb, Gloucestershire—R. Moore and H. Moore, breeches-makers, Epsom and Leatherhead, Surrey—J. Creffield and R. Coventry, coachmakers and farriers, Slough, Buckinghamshire—C. Shargool and H. Shargool, music -sellers, Birmingham—W. Wilberforce and H. Cleeve, cow-keepers, Edgware-road. SCOTCH SEQUESTRATION. J. Philp and Son, distillers, Dolls, Clackmannan, to meet June 13 and 27, at twelve, within the Tontine Inn, Alloa. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, MAY 6. CHARLESWORTII V. REDGARD. This was an action to recover a penalty of 1001. from the defend an t f or h av i ng acte d as a comm i ss i oner f or paving and lighting in a matter wherein he was interested. The action was tried before Chief Justice Tindal at the Lincoln Assizes, when a verdict was found for the de fendant. Mr• BALGUY , on a day in last term, obtained a rule to show cause why that verdict should not be set aside and a new trial had. The notes of the learned judge were read over, from which it appeared th a t i n J u l y last an order was madeC by the then commissioners respecting a footpath which passed the defendant's premises ; he was elected a commissioner in August, and in October he attended a meeting, at which he moved that the order of July should be discharged; he was then told by the plaintiff who was also a commissioner, that he would enforce the statute if he acted in contravention of it. He, however, pressed his motion, and a ballot was had upon it, when, there havin g been thirty-two commissioners present, twenty were found to have voted for the motion, eleven against e i r t e , s a p n e d ak o in n g e ball was found to have fallen between the two boxes. The thate was, whether considered the tnotr the ques tionjnr Y found nosv to be L eontended that side, o v r e was an r a s e e ti r n g g ea N n v w ithin h A i n D t A h ik e i smaena and Mr. o f t A h o a c s h it ee c n ou e ld qu n a n ti t y be ha so hl c e o h n a si d de h re e against hi s own i n t er est. Mr. B ALGUY , f or th e plaintiff, submitted that the de fendant had actually voted for it, and it was proved that the w h o l e o f the thirty-two balls were t h ro wn into the box, and although the one was a lost vote, still it was clear that the intention of the party was to have voted. Besides, he had opened the case by stating he would prove that it was another commissioner, and not the defendant, who put his ball into the wrong box ; he put that commissioner into the box, but the learned judge ruled that he could not be examined. HILL and Mr. FOLLETT were heard on the same side. The CouRT would consult with the Lord Chief Justice before givaig judbment. LONDON, SATURDAY EVENING, JUNE 7, 1834. CONSISTORY COURT, JUNE 6. (Before Dr. LUSHINGTON.) JUDGMENT—TANN AND CLITHEROE V. OWEN. Dr. LUSIIINGTON gave judgnent in this case, the ar guments on which were fully heard last court-day. The learned Judge stated that the cause was one for the sub traction of church-rates, promoted by the churchwardens of the parish of St. Matthew,, Bethnal-green, against Mr. Owen, a parishioner. The rate was opposed on three grounds—first, that the vestrymen had no power to im pose a church-rate; secondly, that i f they had, they had unduly exercised the right; and thirdly, that the rate had been made for an illegal purpose—for paying the rector's salary. He now had to consider if the objects for which the church rate were levied had not vitiated it. If he should declare it illegal, he was aware great difficulties would be occa sioned in the parish. He should take the law as he found it—no judge ought to strain or deviate from the established law or usage—such a course produced uncertainty for cer tainty. The law gave the vestry no power to apply a church-rate for the purposes intended ;it was his duty to protect the inhabitants in a case like this, and he was bound to declare the rate illegal. Considering the parish had gone on in this way since 1797, he should give no costs. The parish would have to go to Parliament, and his present decision would ultimately be advantao-eow. The RECIsTEAE—Does the ,Court pronounce the rate null and void ? The KING'S ADVOCATE said the Court pronounced that-the churchwardens had failed in their proof to establish the rate. Dr. LosnixoToN said, that was the formal mode, he gave his judgment. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF COMMONS, June 6. The SPEAKER resumed the Chair at twenty-five minutes past five. MESSAGE FROM THE LORDS. A message from the Lords announced that their lordships had agreed to the Navy Pay Bill, the Bill relative to Friendly Societies, and several other hills. Their lordships also ,requested that that house would be pleased to allow William Tooke, Esq., to attend a select committee of their lordships, ap pointed to inquire into and regulate the practice of sweeping chimneys. On the motion of Mr. BYNG, the Staines' Bridge Bill was read a third time and passed. Mr. EW ART presented a petition from the mer chants of Liverpool against the Court of Passage Bill. Petitions against the Poor Laws' Amendment Bill were presented by Mr. William Brougham from St. George's, Southwark ; by Mr. Shaw Lefevre, from Basingstoke ; by Mr. Strutt, from Derby; by Mr. Hawkins, from Newport, Isle of \\Tight ; by Mr. . Charles Tyrrell, from Hackney ; by Lord Ebrington, from Withering-ton ; and by Mr. Gisboine, from the neighbourhood of Dprby. On the motion of Mr. HEATHCOTE, returns were ordered of the amount of exports and imports of flour, meal, &c., in the islands of Guernsey, Jersey, and Man. Mr. P. THOMSON, in answer to a question from Mr. A. BARING, said, that cases of imputed fraud respecting the importation of corn from the islands of Guernsey and Jersey had been inquired into, and he had received from the custom-house officers of those islands their opinions stating that they had no grounds for supposing that frauds of that description had been committed. He would further inquire into the subject. Mr. FINCH gave notice that he would move an amendment to the motion of the hon. and learned member for Tipperary on Tuesday next, respecting the Irish church. Lord ALT H ORP, in answer to a question from Mr. GOULBURN, said, that if the house had no objection, he would propose that the house should sit on committee on the poor laws at the morning sittings on Monday and Friday next week. COURT CIRCULAR. The Duchess of Kent and the Prince and Princess Ho henlohe Langenbourg visited the Duchess of Gloucester and the Princess Augusta yesterday. The Princess Augusta, attended by Lady Louisa Corn wallis, Miss Wynyard, Sir Benjamin Stephenson, and Col. Wynyard, honoured the ball given at Willis's rooms, on Tuesday night, in aid of the funds of the Adult Orphan Institution, with her presence. Viscount Melville, Sir James Graham, the Lord Advo cate of Scotland, the Attorney-General, the Right Hon. J. Abercrombie, and Mr. Ewing, had an interview yester day with Viscount Althorp, at his residence in Downing street, respecting Leith Harbour. Prince Talleyrand had an audience yesterday with Vis count Palmerston at the Foreign Office. Despatches were received yesterday at the Colonial Office from Lord Aylmer, the Governor of the Canadas. A deputation, including Lords Normantown and Ache son, had an interview yesterday with Viscount Althorp and Mr. Littleton. Mr. O'Hanlon, Counsel to the Irish Secretary's Office, attended the meeting. Mr. Spring Rice left town on Thursday afternoon to at tend his election at Cambridge. COMMERCIAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH FRANCE " ROYAL ORDONNANCE. " Louis Phillippe, &c. " We have decreed and do decree as follows :—The articles hereafter mentioned shall be admitted into the kingdom, upon the conditions, and subject to the duties attached to each. " 1. Cotton ,hreaA, unbleached (No. 143 of the me trical system, and upwards), imported via Havre, Calais, and Dunkirk, in packets of 10, 5, or 2 1 ,ilbs. English at least—plain, 7fr., on reels, Bfr. per kilogramme. On pay ment of duty these cotton threads shall receive a mark, without which they shall still be seizable in the interior. " The above regulation shall commence from the lst of September, 1834. " 2. Cachmire shawls, not of European manufacture, when presented at any of the bureaux for prohibited goods, 20 per cent. on their value; provided no declaration of value under 500 fr. be made. " 3. Cotton lace, whether made by hand or by ma chinery (the same as thread lace), five per cent. "4. Tissues of unmixed silk (without distinction of origin) the same as manufactured silk, 16fr. per kil. "5. New clothing, articles of confectionary, and other effects for the ,personal use of travellers, if declared to he so before inspection, and admitted by the Custom-house not to be intended for subjects of commerce, 30 per cent. " 6. Iron cables for the navy, the same duty as on iron bars of the smallest dimensions. " 7. Gold watches, 6 per cent. ; silver watches, 10 per cent. ; movements of every description, not in cases, 10 per cent. " importations will only be permitted through the medium of the bureaux for prohibited goods. Watches thus introduced shall be forwarded, after security given for payment of duty, and under the seal of the Customs, to one of the proof establishments of Paris, Lyons, Besan con, Montbeliard, or Lons le Saulnier, to be tried and stamped ; and shall then be privileged as guaranteed. " 8. Copper wire gilt, wove in silk, 950 fr. ; and sil vered, 600 fr. per 100 kil. "9. Scented calf-skins (called Russi' leather) fit for bookbinding, and dressed with willow or birch bark (not to include shoe-sole leather) sfr. each. " 10. Chromates of lead, 75fr. ; of potassium, 150 fr., per 100 kil. " 11. Praiss, or tobacco liquor, lfr. per 100 kil. " 12. Concrete, or pulverised extract of bark, imported from Peru in French ships, lfr. per kil. " 13. Foreign rum, arrack, and ratifia (the same duty as cherry brandy), 100 f. per hectolitre. " PROHIBITIONS REMOVED FROM EXPORTS. " The following articles may be exported on payment of the duties affixed to each : " 1. Raw silk, floss, 3fr. ; milled, 2fr. per 100 kil. ; silks dyed and dressed for tapistry, if in balls not exceed ing one-half a kilogramme in weight, or in small skeins or bobbins, not more than 3 decagrammes, lfr. per 100 kil. ; sewing silk, each skein or bobbin not to exceed 3 dec. 10 cents per 100 kil. ; all othersi6fr. Flock silk, combed for under clothing, lfr. ; in mass or carded 2fr. ; spun, or ferret (at any of the bureaux) 5 cents per 100 kil. " 2. Skins or hair fitted for hat-making or trimming ; undressed rabbit and hare-skins, 75 cents per kil. ; badger or beaver-skins, 5 cents ; dressed rabbit-skins, 2f. ; hare, badger, and beaver, 50 cents. 3. Thread de mulquinerie, 40f. per 100 kil. " 4. Of dog's hair, 25 cents. "5. Shreds and cuttins of undyed skins, 25 cents. " 6. Alkalies, 50 cents. " 7. Groizil, or broken glass, If. "8. Filings, the same as the raw metal of which they are made. " TONNAGE DUTIES. " The tonnage duty at present fixed at 37fr. 75 cents, by the law of 1826 ; and at lf. 50 cents by the decree oi June, 1832, upon French ships coming from Great Britain, or any of its European dominions, is reduced to lf., exclu sive of the decime. " The laws hitherto in force upon these subjects shall so continue, unless where expressly altered by the present decree, which shall be submitted to the Chambers within the first month of their next session. " Our ministers are charged, &c. " LOUIS PHILIPPE." " By the King—The Minister of Commerce, —Moniteur. " T. DUCHATEL." SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. NEIC TON RACES, June 5 . The Borough Gold Cup of 100 sovs., added to a Sweep stakes of 10 sovs. each. Two miles. 12 subs. Mr. E. Peel's ch. f. Frenzy, 4 yrs 1 Sir R. W. Bulkeley's Pickpocket, 6 yrs 2 Mr. Bower's b. m. Lady Stafford, 5 yrs 3 The St. Leger Stakes of 25 sovs. each, and 25 added, mile and three quarters, 14 subs., was won by Sir J. Ge rard's Billinger, beating Mr. E. Peel's Bardolph and Mr. Mostyn's Birdlime A Sweepstakes of 25 sovs. each, and 20 added. Mile and _ half. 4 subs. Mr. Turner's Miss Golborne 1 Mr. M os ty n ' s Vi ttor i a Mr. Peirse's Benevolence 3 The Haydock Colliery Purse of 50 sovs. added to a Sweep stakes of 5 sovs. each. Mile and quarter. 8 subs. Sir J. Gerard's Intruder, 3 yrs 1 Mr. Beardsv‘-orth's b. f. by Longwaist, 3 yrs 2 Sir T. Stanley's b. c. Young Tarragon A Plate of 70/. was won in t wo two-mile heats by Mr. Nanney's Ratcatcher, beating Mr. Houldsworth's Titus and Mr. Turner's br c. by Lottery, who fell. LIVERPOOL COTTON-IVIARKET, JUNE 4. —The demand continues active, and the sales amount to-day to 6,000 bales and at steady prices. Specu lators purchase freely, and have taken to-day 300 American and 300 Surats. For export 800 Ame ricans. The particulars are -300 Pernams, llid. to to 120. ; 150 Bahias, 104 cl. to 100. ; 200 Maran hams, 1 lid. to 12d. ; 30 Sawgiiined, 10d. ; 1,400 New Orleans, 71d. to lid. ; 2,000 Boweds, 70. to gid. • , 1,500 Alabamas, 7 4 d. to 9d . ; 400 Surats, 6d. , I to did. per lb. • UNIVERSITIES ADMISSION BILL. Mr. C. BULLER, seeing the hon. member for Lanchashire in his place, wished to ask if he proposed proceeding with the Universities Admission Bill on Monday next ? Mr. WOOD would be guided entirely by the conve nience of the house. If it was desirable that the bill should pass during the present session, he thought the best course would be to read it a second time without discussion, leaving that for . a future stage. • In reply to a question from Mr. RUTH VEN, Mr. LITTLETON stated that no report from the commissioners of inquiry into municipal corporations had been then presented, nor could he say when it would be. POOR LAWS' AMENDMENT BILL. On the order of the day being read for the further consideration of this bill in committee, Mr. COBBETT rose and said that before the Speaker left the chair he wished to suggest to the noble lord whether he rniant not be induced to insti tute some inquiry into tie cause of the increase of pauperism throughout th- , country. In his opinion it was the duty of the house, before they proceeded to pass such a measure as that upon which they were about to go into committee, to inquire into what were the causes which made such a bill at all necessary. It was more especially the r'uty of the house to do this as the committee themselves said that if they found that the poor rates were increased or even stationary it would not be desirable to make any alterations at all. The poor law committee had said that Kothing was to be done if the poor rates were progressive, and it was clear that those rates had increased during the last year on an average throughout the kingdom of four per cent. According to the rules laid down in the directions to be given to the commissioners, the house ought not to proceed any further with this bill without ascertaining the cause of the increase of pau perism. This was the way in which men proceeded in other cases to ascertain the causes of an evil before they attempted to apply the remedy, and the only reason why they did not pursue the same course in the present in thesentca fasewee. T was, thathe es htheehe always ouse proceeded daredno a looktto sif the case the poor had committed some crime, as if the magistrates had been guilty of some fault, or as if the law were in fault ; but the fact was the house, and the house alone, was in fault ( Hear, hear) ; and the house therefore was afraid to look the case manfully in the face. The condition of the poor had been getting worse for years. Fifty years ago, in the parish of Breade, in Sussex, there was only one cottage in all the parish that did not belong to the labourers themselves, and now there were but two cottages in the parish that were owned by the labouring poor. The case was the same throughout all the kingdom of England and Wales. Forty years ago, he knew that in one parish there was not one labourer that did not brew his own beer, and now there was not in the same parish one labourer that did. Such was the deterio rated condition of the poor. The agricultural com mittee had reported to the house, that a want of em ployment was one of the great causes of the immense increase of poor rates, and the same committee had reported that the land was not as productive as it might be, for want of sufficient labour being bestowed upon it. He wanted the house to explain how this could be—how land could be badly cultivated for want of labour, whilst the country was full of labourers wanting employment. How could this be ? Why, it was a proof that the country was badly governed. The next time that it was moved that the Speaker should leave the chair upon this bill, he should make a motion that, before the house proceeded further with this bill, a select committee should be appointed to inquire into the causes of the great increase of the amount of the poor rates in England and Wales. On the question that the Speaker leave the chair, Mr. CL AY rose, and, as far as he could be heard in the gallery, we understood him to ask the noble lord ( Althorp) whether it was not his intention to admit of appeals against the decisions of the poor law commissioners being moved by writ of certiorari into the King's Bench. Lord ALT HO RP was understood to answer in the n egative. Sir J. SC ARLETT conceived that the noble lord, by such a resolution, was about to establish an abso lute tyranny on the part of the commissioners. These officers would not be responsible for any of their con duct under the bill ; no action could be brought against them ; there would be no tribunal to try the case or to correct anything they might do. He for one did not think that the people of England were a t the present time at all disposed to submit to such a power, either in the poor law commis sioners or in that house itself. If the com missioners were to be obliged to make their orders legal, who was to judge of their legality, unless it were some of the superior law courts ? This would be the only remedy. An action must be brought, in order to ascertain whether the orders of the commis- 'goners were legal; but by the bill the commissioners, it seemed, were to be relieved from all responsibility. The noble lord was about to establish an absolute ir responsible power, which no court of law could con trol. The question was, did it become the House of Commons to intrust such a power with any man or body ofmen whatsoever. Unless the writ of certio rari was allow e d t o ex i s t as at common l aw , th e fi r st part of the a men d ment w hi c h h e un d ers t oo d t h e no bl e lord was to move to the bill wou ld pass f or not hi ng at all. The noble lord was really about to establish a perfect tyranny, unless he admitted of the control of the Court of King's Bench, or of some control be sides that of submitting the orders of the commissioners to the Secretary of State. Lord AL THO RP said that it made no great difference whether the legality of the orders to be issued by th e C omm i ss i oners were to b e esta bli s h e d previously to their being carried into effect, or whether they . were to b e correc t e d subsequ en tly by a writ of certiorari. There were numerous Acts of Parliament establishing separate jurisdictions, and by which the writ of certiorari was taken away. The present he (Pnicr 70.) allowed was an anomalous case, and required cons - deration. Mr. CLAY--As the noble lord had said that tic point of doing away with the certiorari required further consideration, it would be premature in the house to pursue the subject further at the preser.t moment. He trusted, however, that the noble lord would give the house timely notice of what he might determine upon. Mr. GROTE conceived that the orJers of Cpm missioners were not to be suspeetted whenever any body chose to call their legality into qlw;tirm. - Sir R. PEEL trusted that the noble lord vuttld pause and reflect well before he adopted the principle that a legal tribunal was to investigate the regulations of the commissioners before they were to be put into execution. He imagined that the regulations would combine matters of law and matters of policy. There was a wide distinction between applying to a court of law by the writ of certiorari and applying to the Court of King's Bench for its sanction of a whole code of regulations. Mr. HA WES reminded the house that one great object of the bill was to reduce the expense of liti gation. Sir T. FREMANTLE thought that it was not sufficient to give the power to the commissioners of making laws without they had the right of applying them. The SPEAKER then left the chair. On the 21st clause being put, Sir H. WILL OUG HBY objected to the clause, as he conceived that the powers it conveyed, when added to those conferred by the 19th and 20th clause, would enable the commissioners to alter the estates of every man in England. The hon. baronet said that he should move that, in line twenty-six, after the word " same," the following words be inserted, " without the consent of the majority of the owners of property and ratepayers in vestry assembled has been previously signified." This, of course, would only operate in case there was a necessity for a workhouse. The ob jection of the clause, as it stood, was that a set of gen- tlemen in London should be able to order the erection of workhouses. He doubted the policy or necessity of establishing workhouses throughout the country. Lord A L THO RP understood the objection of the hon. gentleman to the clause was that it gave the commissioners the power of taxing parishes to any extent. The ground for the assumption was, that the commissioners had the power of building workhouses in any parishes they pleased. The commissioners had no such power they merely were enabled to direct the forming unions of parishes, and they had merely the power of recommending the erection of work houses ; the parish, however, could refuse. The amount of expenditure that the commissioners could order was comparatively small. The hon. baronet seemed to think that parishes with small rates would okect to contribute towards building workhouses. He ( Lord Althorp) did not anticipate that that would be the case ; he thought that it was more likely that parishes paying large rates would object to pay their proportion to funds for building work houses. If the commissioners were to have the power of building workhouses, the objection of the hon. baronet would be of some weight ; but although this was recommended in the report of the Poor Law Commissioners, his Majesty's government would not consent to give them such power. After a few words from Sir H. WILLOUGHBY, Sir T. FREMANTLE said that it appeared to him that there was some ground for the objection of the hon. baronet, but not to the extent that he sup posed. As the bill stood, the commissioners would have the power of calling upon parishei to give up workhouses adequate to thir wants, and to contribute to-the building of a general workhouse. 'Mr. GROtE thought that the clause did not bear the construction put upon it by the hon. baronet. It did not appear to him, however, that in cases of unions of parishes there was sufficient provision made for in suring that the proportionate expenses of building the workhouse should be fairly assessed. After a few words from Lord Althorp, Mr. Godson, Sir H. Willoughby, and Mr. Handley, Mr. T. ATT WOOD said that he should support the proposition of the hon. baronet, because it tended to render the bill absurd, although it was sufficiently absurd already. He objected to the bill in every pos sible form, and . thought it wrong in its object, wrong in its details, and wrong in its - principle;. The tale lord had nine large volumes on the subject of the Poor Laws which no human being had ever read through, or indeed through any one of them. The noble lord said that his bill was founded on the evidence contained in those volumes. This assertion re minded him of the story of a negro who had been set by his master to count the pebbles on the shore, ald who in a short time returned to his master and said that there were twenty-one thousand millions. His master charged him with telling a falsehood, but the ne4-ro replied, " Go, master, and count them, and you will find lam correct." ( A laugh.) So it was with the noble lord, who said that his bill was founded on the facts contained in the evidence annexed to the report, and told members to go and read it. But he (Mr. Attwood) could tell the noble lord that there was not a young man in that house who could get through those volumes. The whole bill was founded on arbitrary power, and would, if carried, rob the poorer classes in the most shameful manner, indeed as much as was done by the act by which a return was ordered to cash payments. Why did the noble lord attempt to force such a bill down the throats of the people ? For his ( Mr. &ttwood's) part he had never heard of any grievances growing out of the poor laws. The amount - of the po - or rates - paid at present was not greater than it was forty years ago, if they took into consideration the increase of population. At pre sent the poor rates of Birmingham amounted to nearly 40,0001. But the bill of 1819 robbed the people of Birmingham of 4,000,000/. a year. The noble lord could not expect to live much longer. He ( Mr. A.) therefore wished the noble lord had, for the sake of his reputation, ended his political career before be brought forward this absurd bill. Lord A LTHOR P was not surprised that the hon. gentleman objected to every part of the bill, when he said he had never heard of any defects in the poor laws. Sir H. WILLOUGHBY said there were not less than two hundred and twenty parishes in which from one-fifth to one-twentieth of 6 a e population were said in the report of the commissioners to be out of ern- ploymeni during part of the year. Now he wished to know whether they could establish a workhouse sys tem in parishes of this kind. He could mention the parish of Puheer (as we understood), in which there were 100 out of work in summer and 120 in winter. The same might be said of the parish of Battle. Now were all those men who could not procure work to be forced into workhouses? There were some parishes in which the single men would be quite sufficient to do all the work of the parish. The consequence in such parishes must be to send all the men with families into the workhouse, or else compel them to accept of very reduced wages. If the system in the workhouse was too stringent, men would feel reluctance to enter it, and the effect would be to minimize wages in such a parish. It was well known that persons who once entered a workhouse seldom left it. They were check mated for ever after. He was surprised to hear his hon. friend ( Mr. Whitmore) say that this was a con stitutional measure, and consistent with the poor laws of this country. The fact was, the word workhouse did not once occur in the 43d of Elizabeth. He would be quite satisfied if it could be shown to him that by a system of workhouses work could be procured for the redundant population. Mr. PEASE objected to the clause, as it seemed to him to give the commissioners the power of crushing as many as four or even five parishes, and changing the guardians. Mr. TOWER said he was surprised to hear the member for Birmingham say that there were no com plaints of the poor laws. This might be true of manufacturing districts, for they did not press so heavily upon the manufacturing as upon the agricul tural interests, the former paying in the proportion of only one to twenty-two or twenty-five. He would op pose the amendment because it tended to smother the Commissioners with too great a variety of work, and thus to impair their efficacy. Mr. WHITMORE was convinced that the bill would be productive of the greatest benefit. This was nea time to go into a discussion of the principle. He was surprised to hear his hon. friend object to workhouses. Sir H. WILLOUGHBY explained. What he objected to was the general establishment of work houses. Mr. WHITMORE was convinced that workhouses were essential to the full operation of the bill. The amendment of his hon. friend would have the effect of enabling any parish to refuse its quota of expense. This would derange the whole plan. Mr. R. PAL MER said the bill, as altered, seemed to him not to give p ,;:ver to the commissioners of or dering workhouses to be i, .2ilt without the consent of a rajah, of the landowners. It might render the amendment unnecessary if this pc ,;:t was clearly ex plained. Lord ALTHORP said the bill gave 0 power to the commissioners to order the building of wory.:.houses• They might recommend the buildin r, but it cosh net be done without the consecit of the p risk. Sir H. WILLOUGHBY (across the table)—Not even if united ? Lord ALTHORP—No, not even if united. The commissioners had power only to recommend the building. He wished it to be distinctly understood that neither this clause nor any other in the bi I pre cluded the giving of relief out of the workhouse, though the recommendation of the commissioners eer ialnly tended that way. No one of any experience or practial knowledge could think or attempting to esta blish by law a general system of workhouses. This bill gave the Dower of building them to such parishes as thought fit to do so, and no more. The power of giving relief out of the workhouse was not teten away by the bill. It only took from magistrates the power of ordering relief. Mr. BENETT said the clause, as now worded, seemed to him to give the Commissbners or guardians power of directing workhouses to be Wilt v ithout the consent of the parish. He entirely disapproved of a general system of workhouses. Those who once entered them came out greatly deteriorated is; habits and character. A general system of this kind would perpetuate pauperism throughout the country. No parish ought to be forced to enter into a tender agains4 the wish of the ratepayers. In parishes with which he was acquainted many of the very best labourers could not get work. Were these poor men to be im prisoned in a workhouse for no fault of theirs ? Were they to be punished because they were poor ? He must complain also that this bill took away from the Magistrates the guardianship over the poor of their neighbourhood which they before exercised so benefi cially. Lord ALTHORP said Magistrates would still re tam their influence, for the bill empowered them to exercise the function of guardians. There was no occasion for the change suggested by his hon. friend (Mr. Benett). It was not intended that the guar dian", should have the power of ordering workhouses to be built. 7he presumption was natural that if the guardians assented the ratepayers had also assented. After a few words from Mr. Lennard, Lord Althorp, Mr. Brotherton, and Mr. Halcomb, Sir H. WILLOUGHBY again repeated his ob jection to the clause. The object of his amendment was to have every parish free to build a workhouse or not, as they might determine. Mr. GROTE said the object of this clause was to determine, in the event of a union of parishes, the proportion which each was to contribute to the erectiou of a workhouse, if one was to be built, and the pro portion in which each parish was to be assessed for the support of it. After a few words from Mr. BENETT and Major HANDLEY, Mr. HODGES considered the bill as one which was only to provide relief for the able-bodied poor. Instead, therefore, of taking the rates of parishes for three years, it would be better that there should be au analysis for each year in each parish, in or ler to see the amount of relief afforded to able-bodied poor in each parish of the union. The able-bodied poor might receive but a small amount of the rates, whereas much might be expended in litigation. It would.be neces sary to distinguish yearly the several amounts. He thought it consequently desirous that words should be introduced into the clause to make the commissioners see how much was the expenditure on the able-bodied poor, and that expense only was to be assessed on the union. Lord AL THORP said that relief was not to be afforded to the able-bodied poor alone. All the poor were to be relieved. Therefore it was absolutely ne cessary that the whole amount of the rates should be taken, and their amount should r.ot be d.vided. Since workhouses, and the expenses att( ndant 01 them, were not confined to the able-bodied poor, the only mode of ascertaining the precise amount of the grant required would be to see the whole of the expense the parishes incurred. Mr. P. SCRO PE hoped that the suggestion of the hon. gentleman opposite (Mr. Hodges) would be attended to by the noble lord. He begged to call the attention of the house to one point, namely, that by the operation of this clause considerable pressure would fall upon the smaller parishes, since some of them did not require a workhouse, as they were in the habit of relieving their own poor at the houses of the poor in a moderate and humane manner. It would be extremely hard on the smaller parishes if they were compelled to have workhouses, and it would be also injurious to the poor of those parishes. [The hon. gentleman here referred to Mr. Stewart's (one of the commissioners) report to show that uniting work houses and incorporating parishes had not worked well.] The plan had been tried in several hundreds of the county of Suffolk; in fact it had been tried in at least one-third of the whole of that county. What was the success of the plan ? Those who were in favour of it said that when the plan was matured it would turn out to be a panacea for all the evils of pauperism. Several acts were accordingly applied for and obtained, and the plan had been for some time in operation, but the expectations of those who so strenuously recommended it had not been realized. The workhouses in a little time had become little better than prisons, and were found utterly useless for the purposes they were intended for. (The hon. gentleman then read a letter from Mr. Beecher, who was considered the patron of workhouses, and that gen tleman stated it to be his opinion that the system of workhouses, as recommended by the commissioners, would be productive of more harm than good.) He would not join, however, the hon. baronet by support ing his amendment, since he was entirely opposed to the union of parishes. The house then divided— For the amendment 12 Against it 113 Majority _ _ - —lOl After a few words - from Mr. Halcomb, Mr. Pease, Lord Althorp, Mr. Brotherton, and Mr. Strick,aud, the clause as amended was agreed to. The 22d, 23d, and 24th clauses, with a few verbal amendments, were then agreed to. On clause 25 being read, Sir E. EN ATC HBULL said that he thought it would be extremely unjust to unite, as this clause was meant to no, well-regulated parishes with parishes that were not well-regulated. It would be entailing an expense on the former that they ought not to be subjected to. Lord ALT H 0 RP said that each parish would be rated only according to the necessity of the case, and therefore the parish that was well regulated would have to pay less than those that were not well regu lated. Mr. HAWES said that there must be always some partial injustice done whenever a great measure of general utility was to be established, and although he should be sorry to see injustice done in any case. yet he should prefer that to the reje tioa of a great prin. ciple like this. The clause was then agreed to with some ve:tal amendments. On the 26th clause being proposed, Lord ALTHORP moved the introduction of words making - requisite the concurrence of all instead of three-fourths of the guardions in an union of parishes previously to the introduction of new regulations. The clause, having been alte re d to t h at effect, and after undergoing several verbal amendments, was agreed to. The 27th clause, with some amendments, was than passed. The 25th clause, relating to the power of guardians to assess parishes, was then put from the Chair, and I a ~e d, with several amendments. Clau es 29 and 30 were, after some verbal amend ments, agreed to. Clause 31 was amended and agreed to, after a long d lto low geth to or ne .in of o . in w conversation, in which several members took part ; buti ho in consequence it onse w q a u s en n c a e rr o ie f d t o h n e noiseitwas a in the gallery. Clause 32 was then read. Mr. BAINE S moved that that pa - t of the clause be struck out which directed that tie minister of the parish should be an ex officio guard an of the poor. Several HoN. MEMBERS expressed their concur-