The Sun. — London, England, 1827-12-08 00:00:00

,p 1 e m ent St. Peter" 1 ance, coati' vann. WO, On 111 !noon the 1! he Austri NureinbA MA we UEL i fal Spin in 0 is Image s paid hi s lie 15 it) P S COU 1101. 0 1 , • Ml' Iligence usly reir IEN NA, 0,; 7 ,# to Marie" ' paying Lis ''° I: ' l6 /' aculous inwir t of pilgriV His Royal t Id will be 10.0 II leave us, to 5, indicative a Corps of ./ ere report of 7 1 iority can .V. Ol , ices of all mover, sev er d lo harvest ij! b — u — teTt -0 ss I, ou . ce le election , re 0 n-to-u , ay - t ° 1,14 l' 7° ' ! ;bd i rived here oi ldr Ige from Ae g te. .It wo', ely met an o bt l 0 who has a dig sin, of the Ail/ ikewise arrivv Oct. 24, r r had arriyeai , from Ta b way by 1 „ 6 , • saved by w e t+ , an d lied, the Btfßely Electrec; 0 iii rt, will fix ~ rly inhab•Kulbly e that city P; t is ice, it' .0 It is liot set Cj he Electora.l p a d Ow' ert or he It „i9 l rpre s se d h" of Leipgie are 11:Altu'' Et of the Pr iner Y lussian army P lid the gvea te; c ol aluabie prod ° if e , fair, are rece e Foreign Y es decline. 11' The rate tb for one mol' o l mon ths. )11 bel N, the N e ' to the Pee"?' DAY)• crs o'C"fd i e the state 01:0 few traileact'° ended w ith "Pj e ,, roper to ° ll '' e t tl' .,l ISj thre Ch_a.reihiC deer, „pOl l " 'lll or to oPerate eXpr .re o VFW s hich the 11 1 kis circurnsta l :‘ s intelligence ' fi ll , capital. Cf to -lent decline ) they have hes the latter he it/ 1 Lin at 70 ► s ll a doing in til ; e said to 1 . 18 ef and the 6 Par, l ipanikai, 16i ti t nearly wit" owl nn a dvsl g e cline to 201 1 and Rea l de for the Ace° India Bon'' Ayreoi, 49 b ° 9 ; )anish, (Ai 6 35 7; Dir j ;i; iuguese, 1 1 Braili 3° ' v ef • 14 15 PO win, 1 lalpuxabna' IS T ONE d the price r o f c sequence e , ing four 1 1 5 !mulles. I,ett , o the Mem 9'CL 0 0 0 m for the t`er od 8314 r at il ...,-- ~~ 0 , cr.0 0 are liven for th the tam ac two °r e v Ports• mo st perer4 ['his mooi l r Vestry to„ et (hi!3 r electe" to for be gout , for easy shoes; $O4 iew flatot i oo lie for deb" teillyericer• SRII"PING INTELIACIENcE—(THIS DAY. FROM LLOYD'S. DEAL, DEC.' 7.—Wind N.W.---Arrived . from London the Surrey, Kemp, for Maraboo; Duke, for Afr ica; Christina; Louisa, for Alicant ; a nd Co ventlY, Purd er , f or St. Helena. PORTSMOUTH, Dac.7.—Wind N.W. to W.S.W. v,d the Governor Harcourt, Fuller,. from London to Madras and Bengal. A boat has just arriv e d from Peghatn. The cargo is landing, i n a ',ranged state, but it is thought the vessel will go to Pieces. I)EC. 6.—Wind N.N.W IinnetLIVERP , Barclay, for Jamaica. OOL, DEC. 6.—The John, Marsh, bound to New Orleans, parted from her anchors this morn ing, and got on , shore on Pluckington Bank, but has Ice been got off. Wind N.N.W . bl ow i ng a strong galr% ..—Sailed the RAMSGATE, DEC. 7.---The Era, Williams, from I . o ndo n to Cork, put back here to-day, with loss of niai n-boom, anchor s ,. an d ca bl es , sails and bulwark da rnaged, having ' b een run f ou l' of by a schooner tinder Dungeness. trAumAurs, DEc. 6.—A brig of about 120 tons, with a yellow flag and jack at the mast-head, coming into the harbour, has just grounded on the Levan Sands. Assistance has been sent. The • l F"tuno, Davies, from Liverpool to,Bangor, stranded in Priest Island, has become a wreck. Part of the cargo saved. The Mary Ann, Spooner, from Newcastle - to te a l ti ls . , was abandonc4 on Wednesday, off Flarnbro' The Caspian Doward, from London to New rYe, was totally lost on Hasbro' Sand, on Thurs. Grewsaved. LAw I NTELLIGENCE,(THIS DAY.) Co/ Inv COURT OF CHANCERY. 11fi. 4-' " n E ll FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMERSET. cou nt . v 4l liar., on the part of the Magistrates of the ag • ," Somerset, was instructed to mention this case r :. 111 ' time county being much in want of a Coroner in ' lt. Laing' s place. tot t i l e . ;K_ Nsintur appeared for Mr. Laing, to express that sh ew •L'a a sense of the kindness that had been to ato L; •.'rn, and only to add that he had now nearly to tlp l ed an arrangement that would enable him to return co ua „ e i d ischarge of his duty, whi c h was a l mos t sure to be th e er s by the ti me th a t h a d b een or i g i na ll y as k e d, name l y , 0 ; 'ln day ex of nt term, should th e C our t b e pleased to 1, 7. that indulgence. 1 14(1 14 Lour:mar wished to know what the Magistrates ss, to this. L a g 0f bAnler, obserted, that they left it entirely in the the Court. 41 St • loansurr said as th a t w as so, considering the long " tai„ "la gentlem had rerved the office, that he had tw ined all frolall along an an irreproachable character, and that as this • eH IY an accidental misfortune that had removed him to t he discharge of his duties, the Court thought it right cry the indulgence asked for. 114 THE MATTER OF THE REV. sin. HOLMES. HORNE stated that in this ease, in which the Com truebio4 • f of Lunacy had been quashed, the parties who:ipr: t 'r it had issued another, and given notice to hand"'Hol to stewards not to part with the hinds in theiihait s,, t he hank to the same effect. Under these Il e yl it was necessary to have some dene t , e th: f a r t in t s l a te _ nityshiu, en tlenlan might not be starved into a at :his Lord t 4 ad for that purpose, he (Mr. • Thi&bt%4l,"wer en tle etition for Tueeda ll y? brought under consideration.— ra d that the u n t r e at . ter // 7.IORRIS V. DAVIS. Yet r eceiv ° ,4 4,, ,_ t th e L n e " ttl6 Copy of the Judge's n4tes in _ applied to know whether his Lordshi p had aH 1. had ot. He wished to know on what It " "a I . n f 1- a new trial was to he made. /4ijP b l e e 'lle ti v ° e n d n the grounds that the verdict wa s 8.4i11a evidence arid ag a rost G'S BENCH , i Nisi Prius.) (St es COURT ti O n V atKiN • manor v. CHAISIBR,E • tr , Nit Wa s en action on a promissory note for SOL, alleg s e,.a 1 - ",°o e b n p ed bv the defendant when resident !t ine : : 1 11 14 ale Cambridge. The plaintiff was a wilic, ge, in con -IQtlat, and it was stated that the note was p a ss ed .14 ,,,eratio n for money lent in the year 1814. 4-I'l,e Rev. Mr. Fisher was called to prove the hand-writ -14 th e d e f en d ant, who was an under gra d u at e of St. 7,A College. from in Cps e not rrable under examined... - It is the ex l oc i, or l aw of the plac e grad s %ridge that debts are . et r s tea, exeept for necesearies. -.eitiened ' was not given for necessan ta.: " tuove HAM submitted, that the action ac cordcouldeinpotbe co i d• as the note . t h to the law of Cambridge. tir.t ENTERDEN said, din to Mr. Brougham's London T the rule only appliedtomi a n r o g r u s : recut sniAll'--Aecni. g let,„,,' al? Lord, this rule would become d (A laugh') if 'be new University is establishe more &lam in that N r' t em/GI/ AIL M y friend has I ti I I , a are. of the deftirtua named Keswick stated, that d he called on the b ll° e i: 111 i n September last to de s za d n p ayment ~ I know I owe , 1 , 4 -'4 O 'location. The defendant . aiT , ly u i . reoeev and I am sorry he did not ; i ' ll lam • "' - Chambre said, Bless we, -5 th at ' l sg at the note, Mr. differently now." Lard tll Y writing_] write very earlier. " , . , • t e d out an alteration . wh ich . ap- Eek,ei ---I TF:anstr pout bee, alter the face of the note, which in ohuinstinoPgltnowanpiriaod been WI • if the Jury Ic F . ~ to' l. ed. There was no evidence ber v d the note had . -- alt s ,„ . o therefore , . ~,„.. i n his possession, it I ' s I nriiii' u t i \II the plaintiff, Tbe Jur y • •the defendant. or win.. ' r eturn e d a verdict for lea, EsQ' This w LEE V. I le " id . Mr. TALTOURD open '4 th e i 4 4u action for an abseil - P cadi ; Th e en egs. in Oxfordshire. 5 ''n 't. 'd nt at Whitney, 4. 55 , -4340 N SERGEANT stated the case. The p la . in- The efo., torney, I'm c of l arge fortune, the op e n s plain °f Nit rs.',laliit was a gentleman t o h is ,1-' porn.ar, for many years master s 4 aleat in-law of i 4 ncl, wh i , Y. and the son- . r e T id preserver gain e Li aPPeared to be a GM., ...ID' .13 1- f l t i l r i a e lt ce er re S m t o r?C o ti - "e could not help adding, that the squabbles . laws 'ad ill bl °al l engendered by the game were obliged tc ointry e ... • ta - were ho great, that those who t. em_ :N., reside in town, bad reason to congratulat h s Ina heir freed I yances. The plain in the ' , a 1,.... t 4 edontoeT , freedom from sue i anno lay, and a s well 417 he of great respectability , a a l irY 13at • - • ' as an y titnrsutheegkaiinngedom. Inmastsr of ceremonies or 4 0 out with two dogs, who started a , are in a t t . urn .n i g p so ld beloogiog, to plai t'ff himself, lint the hare no niu 1,•,1iti11...,L.. te e d ve w r it a la _fettn ii-lenattorictsioirns W. , o . f % Strictland's park . the Game Laws, 1 friends who were ~,i ti ,OKs pursued, and Mr. L ee ;all. two which h. ' l '4l used eve), exertion to get off the dogs, , C y did ' e t time . 1 h Veiling of the same day 11r. _ in a short n the e i"L, Uottrel Dormer, the defendant, called at Mr. Lee 's ):*) and he had not yet come hom e . M r . Dorm e r_ a ,n.' hiedProce in search of him on horseback with ,„_ lL 'r,h ill hand a nd having met Mr. Lee he inflicted ;me-wo heavy blows on' h is arm with the stick, and after , remalrks, threw IVIr• Lee his card and rode off, Lin er th ese circumstances, *Mr Lee thought 11411aelf bnand to hringMr.Dornier, 11--- ` - ''''' t— e tt metro p olitan jury' who would not he so likely to sympathise With great game Prmerver .„,„ ~„.. as a, jury of Oxfordshire 'Squi a Ai r . Dormer - of those nominated to fill the oft • o f High Sheriff, for the county of Oxford, during the ensu ing ye a r, so that Mr. t tt e had eanle reason for l l ' g g his case !routhie Court, where he conlidentlynexu-lenaed that the Jury ' give such damag es as into would not P only punish the de lenient, but serve ae an throughout the • country. example to wealthy young Evidence was add Squires for the plaintiff—Damages SOL ueed o the assault, and a verdict taken COURT OP COMMON PLEAS. aertinae V. sunzr. ,pout,This rase, whish merely involved some matters o f ac occupied the C ourt for more than three hours. The %Jury found their BREACH verdict .r. t r the d e f en d an • OF PROMISE OF MARRIAGE. M r. -r• vuriturs V. CSAITCINLY• , 5 ()MUNSON opened the Pleadings. The declara tfD the plaitltiff, Lion se t foith a promise of marriage mad e hy the defendant and the breach of the promise. The de endant ,i, ,Nsded that he had made no Promise . promise. "".• "'"geallt TADDY stated the vase. The plaintiff !Susan Phdilip,) was the daughter of a tradesman, residing In the Cam0,,,,, u.. oti , , r a Kennington , and the defendant eras a timber-mechant, residing in Camden Town. The Parties be,-arne first ,foliainted at the how, e o f a M rs . ‘Voods, in tho Octobe'r' Preceding the events which have nfortunately i emlered the present action necessary. The' .earned Sergeant then entered into a detail of the various ireurnstances subsequently di,eineed i n • the evidence, and 'reins . , in aggravation of clanlages, the topics usually ud vanced in actions of this description. Ile then called the following witnesses :.--- Mrs. Woods.—l am the wife of John Weods. Miss Phillips was on a visit with me last October. The de fendant was in the habit of coming to my house, and there met the plaintiff. During his visits I sate that in his man ners towards• her he exhibited that degree of gallantry which young men generally do to ladies. I saw nothing more than this in his deportment. I, however, told him that Miss,Phillips had no fortune. lie replied that he did not want a fortune. Mr. Sergeant WILDE declined cross-examining this witness. Mrs. Phillips, the Mother of the plaintiff, was then called —I remember my dabghter having returned from a visit to Mrs. Woods. On the Tuesday We after her return Mr. Crutchly called eh her ; he did not re main long. That Was his first visit to my house. I then ilved at Kentngton. I have since re moved to Kennington. He continued to visit at my house for six months. For the first three months, or nearly four, he came every day to us. I told him that nay daugh ter had no money; he answered that his work was done, and that he did not want money. He dined with us on every Sunday, with the exception of two only, for the six Months. He always called nie " mother," Mr. Phillips " father," and one of my daughters "sister." He treated the plaintiff as his intended wife, sometimes calling her "Mrs. W. C." (his own name is William,) and et other times Susan. On the 20th of February, our hous€ was broken open, and a part of the plaintiff 's clothes which had been made for the wedding, were stolen. Among other things her " under clothes," were taken away. He upon that occasion asked whether these wedding-clothes could be replaced in ten days. We did purchase the clothes and they were brought home by the defendant in his chaise from the linen-draper's. lie often talked of marriage ; upon one occasion there was some talk about the wedding cake. I asked who was t o provide it—h e laugh ed and said—. Surely not I." - I then promised to get it. I romember that when a servant of mine was about to leave us, Mr. Crntchly said that she would do for him, upon which I observed, oh, no, she is not cook enough for you; he often talked of marriage to the plain tiff; at one time my daughter said that she wished to be married at Kensington church, upon which the defendant expressed a desire that their marriage should take place at Hellingdon, because his father and mother had been married there; he always was desirous that his mar riage should take place in July. 1 remember his proposing to meet my daughter at Notting-hill, but she was prevented by indisposition from going there. The last time he was at my house, ho took leave of my daughter in the most affectionate manner, and on going said to her, " good night, God bless you ; in a few weeks I shall take you home with me." He never came near us since. lam confident that he on several occasions spoke of his marriage with my daughter, as an event that certainly would take place. Cross-examined by Mr. Sergeant WILLS.—Upon se veral occasions before his last visit, my daughter appeared to be in very low spirits. The defendant wroto letters her. They had some little differences about Mr. Cr • - his 2 0 h o usekeeper. IY'aV mater, P t w fo h r o tl i i l e ad p f l o a r i plaintiff—Damages s x 0 OLD BAILEY.-(THIS DAY.) OLD COURT. ‘ Willi am . Quin, aged . 17, was indicted for stealing a ;mepiece and other articles, value 84, from the dwelling.. ,ouse of the Rev. G. Greis, of Vincent-square—Verdict . Not Guilty." Ann F. Clifton wee indicted for stealing from a letter, on the 4th of October, a 51. Bank of England note; the property of William Holmes, in her capacity of servant to the General Post-office. Mr. Sergeant BOSANQUET, Mr. GURNEY, and Mr. BOLLAND, appeared for the prosecution, and Mr. Anomms for the defence. The prisoner applied to the Court to postpone her trial, as she had not received notice that the trial would come on this morning, till ten o'clock last night, and her witnesses both to fact and character had not yet arrived. She also wished to wait till her Counsel (Mr. Adolphus) had arrived. The Court asked if she would make affidavit of her not having received notice, and was answered in the affirmative. Mr. Anoi.rnus then entered the Court, and stated that he had received no brief, and there must have been some mistake. The prisoner said that Mr. Harmer's clerk had told her that Mr. Adolphus was her Counsel.—(While Mr. Adolphus was speaking, the brief was put into his hand.)—He complained deeply of such neglect, and the consequences of it to the prisoner. The Court, however, gave him time to read his brief, which he availed himself of, and ,afterwards consulted with the prisoner. A COUNSEL (whose name we could not learn) made ap.: plication for the discharge of an order for estreating the re cognizances of Charles Lindon, the witness who did not attend against Owen Daintry on his first trial.—The ap plication was rejected by the Court. ' Ann Frances Clifton, was then indicted, and pleaded " guilty " to the larceny, in stealing the note, but pleaded not guilty to a second indictitent for secreting and stealing the letter, which charge would affect her life by the Post office Act. Mr. GURNEY then stated to the Jury, that the prisoner had pleaded guilty of the minor offence, and that the Post office would not offer any evidence on the capital charge. The Jury then returned their verdict accordingly. The prisoner was neatly dressed in a green cloth dress, and appeared perfectly self-possessed, when consulting with her Counsel, at the deck. Nathaniel Peppiott was indicted for Laving disposed of a forged note, for 51., knowing the same to be forged, with intent to defraud the Governor and Company of the Bank of England. Mr. Sergeant BosawguEr and Mr. BOLLAND attended for the prosecution, and Mr. Anotxnus for the defence. Elizabeth Falkener knew the prisoner by sight, and by having formerly lodged in her house, No. 19, Royal Hos pital-row, Chelsea. Is a green-grocer. Prisoner, on the 10th of October, came to her shop, with another person whom she did not know, to sell her some potatoes. Asked her to give him change for a 51. note, which he gave her. She gave him five sovereigns in change. He in dorsed it " Nathaniel Peppiott, Croydon." Nothing more Passed on that night. Put the note into the pocket-book, Dubois, to p a y t o M r . tin m :n e e s d to h er on the 19th, James kept i t t h ere t i l l the 14th, when she gave it to Mr. by ß A ul i co n e D k. ubo T is h , e a n s o a te ba w d as on r e. e- Witness left the note in Dubois's possession till witness could find the lierson of whom she had received it. Saw the prisoner again on Saturday the 20th ; he came to her house. Had told her son that if he should see the in Covent-garden-market, not to ti prisoner a 3 note, but to tell him that sh e wanteds trease% hi nz about the By Mr. Anomalies—Was always on friendly terms with th e prisoner. 'Was not sure that he wrote the word n Croydon" when he wrote his name on the note, hut knew that it had net been written while it was in her pos session. Ne wrote it of his own accord. The person with the prisoner was an elderly man. Did not hear the latter say that he was going to set him up in business as hie agent, nor did she see prisoner give the sovereigns to the other man directly he had received them. Prisoner had collected debts for her, and she always found him strictly honest. Thomas F a lk ener , son o f the last witness, was told of the note by his mother ; had known Peppiot for four years. Prisoner came to him in Covent-garden, on the 20th, and asked him how he did. Witness told prisoner that his mother wanted to see him, about the potatoes. Prisoner said that he would be down during the day. By Mr. Anomics—When in Covent-garden, he did not make any suspicious inquiry, such as " Does she not want to see me for any thing else?" Did not know that he always dealt in potatoes in Covent-garden-market. James Dubois received the note and returned it, 33 stated by prosecutrix. Mrs. Falkener at first hesitated, and said it was not her note. Witness asked her how she knew that it was the note, and she answered that she knew it by the address being written in Tale ink. H a d himself marked it with his initials on receiving it from Mrs. Falkener. Went again on the 20th to Mrs. F.'s house with the constable, Weeks; saw the prisoner there at about or 8 o'clock at night. Witness asked him if he knew that the note which he paid to Mrs. Falkener was a forged one. He replied, is it ? Witness asked from whom he received it ? He replied, "of Mr. Sully, in payment of hay which I sold to him." 'Witness asked who Mr. Sully was, and prisoner said that he was a gentleman living at Pi nt _ lico, who kept a horse and a gig or two, and he had no doubt would give him the money for it. Prisoner had a and told them that if they would get into the gig he would drive them to Mr. Sully's house. He drove to No. 12, Trellick terrace, Vauxhall-road, and said, " Here's where Mr. Sully lives, I'll go out and get you the money." Weeks, however, would not let him, bet sent witness to make in. quiriee. A female came to the door and said, " that no Mr. Sully lived there." Prisoner heard what passed. Disco vered afterwards that the female was the prisoner's mo ther ; she said she knew nothing of a Mr. Sully. The pri soner then rushed into the hclnse and said, " yea, Yes tell Mr. What d'ye call-him, to come here !" He also said " Here's a forged note come home ; for God's sake give me five sovereigns." At that moment there was a scream itr the house ffol4 two or three Woruett and childTe l3 l ind . one of them called oht Eire thd trlaps at the door, by God." Wituesl was fearful of a rescue, and prevailed on the constable to take the prisoner away. Wit ness saw two men in the house, one of whom ftAlowed them out.. By Mr. A nor.rHus—Had known the prisoner all his life. He generally lived with his father and mother. Hi s father was a cow-keeper, and 11.;...d . been dotal a few months. It was a female voice that cried out in the house. -The pri soner's mother caught hold of her son, and tri e d to pu ll bith inside. Witness said she ivas attempting a rektie, and she then let go, and Went iritd theparlour. it' was a man of colour who came out. Did not attempt to secure any of the wamen or men in the house, nor to get any neighbour ing constable to de it. Had been upon cautious terms with the prisoner and his fan3il7•. Weeks, the constable, toilful:tied the statement of the last witness, as to the apprehent3iOn: Several witnesses Were called to prove that the prisonei had been seen at Trelliek-place, ith if sleeping theie, drn' that there Was rid person naincd Peppiott at Croydon. He called several witnesses to character. The word on the note, supposed to be " Croydon," was written with pale WI, and much blotted; so as to be almost illegible. _ The Learned Judge gummed u;), and the Jury retired and returned a verdict of Not Guilty: NEW COURT. (Before the COAIMON SERGEANT!) Catherine Poland stood indicted fur stealing a piece of cotton cloth, value 2s. 10d., the property of Fetlieridge and Co. of High-street, Whitechapel, linen-drap ers . The prosecutor stated, that on the 36th of October last he received -information from his shopman, which caused him to go up to the prisoner, who was standing not far from the counter, and said to her, " I cannot let von go, for you have something about you which you have not, paid for." The prisoner answered, "I mu i o . capahlenf such a thing." Witness however insisted upon h er being searched, and called his housekeeper for the pur pose. The prisoner however seemed to be disinclined to ho searched, and witness then threatened to send for an officer. Upon this the prisoner said, "Do not send for an officer, I will give you what you want." She accord ingly produced the piece of cotton from under her gown, He then gave her into custody. Cross-examined by Mr. Atr.vv.—Witness does not know that the prisoner was bailed by Mr. Justice Bailey. She might have been. - A few days before she had bought goods to the amount of 131. from him. John Couch is a shtpmau in the service of the prosecutor. He remembers the prisoner comi n g into his master's shop on the day in question, and r h pS i th s ue.c s suspicion.. enaigolnoa.7 piece h e e o n f standingt's' h o t e toi saftto the whichei counter, n s t l o the paid idc s h l 4 i l o e' p x ? i h t de ' r shawl was pinned up high, but afterwards ,he pinned it lower down. Soon after she bad done this, she drew his attention to another part of the counter, by asking him the price of a piece of goods that was lying on it. While he was answering her, he perceived that the parcel of goods before her shrunk, and it seemed' as if something was drawn away' from under it. In consequence of this, he spoke to his master, who, when the prisoner was going away, came up to her, and said that she had more about her than she ought to have, or words to that effect. The prisoner replied that she was incapable of such an act, and that her name was Poland or I - !olock, he could not re member which. The prosecutor, however, threatened to send for an officer. The prisoner begged he would not, and said I will make you any recompense you like. Cross-examined.—Witn e ss does not remember that she told where she lived. Does not remember that she said the very gown she had on she bought at that shop. The piece of cotton she bought and that which' she pulled from Under her gown are of the same colour, and very like in appear ance, but does not think they could be mistaken one for another. That which she bought was of a much finer texture than the other. The officer who took her into custody was then called, but his evidence was not material. The prosecutor, on being recalled, said that he believed the prisoner said at the time that she lived at No. 15, Alie-strut, Goodman's-fields. For the defence a great number of witnesses were called, who stated that the prisoner's husband was a respectable engraver, that she was the mother of seven children, and that she had always borne a most irreproachable character. One of the witnesses, who bad known her:thirty years, said that he considered it impossible that she could have com mitted the act imputed to her. The COMMON SERGEANT, in summing up, said that certainly a great deal might be said of the weight of a good character in - doubtful cases, and the prisoner had received a most respectable character, but it was still geilkg too fac to say, as one of the witnesses had done, that it .was possible for her to have done it. He was afraid experience chewed that such things bud been done by persons bearing irreproachable characters, and moving in a respectable sphere of life. It appeared that the prisoner had laid out a considerable sum of money at the shop a few days befoTe , and that she was not in a situation of life in which it was likely for her to have the temptation of want before her to induce her to commit the act. Indeed, from all they saw of her, it appeared highly improbable that slut should have committed the act, and the Jury would therefore be well convinced that the evidence brought the fact clearly home, before they could find her guilty. After having heard the evidence read through, the Jury can suited together for a few minutes, and then found the pri soner Guilty," but recommended her to mery, in consi deration of her large family, and previous good character, The prisoner ie 46 years of age, was most respectably attired, and appeared greatly agitated during the trial. We were informed at the conclusion of the trial that the prisoner's name was Polock, but the indictment had it Poland. THE MARKETS.-(THIS DAY.) COVENT-GAR EN MARKET. There was a good supply al the trade was dull. Carrots it this morning's market, but were lower than on this day things little, if any, alteration. extravagantly high prices were is doing. _ _ se'nnight ; in prices of other In Red Cabbages, fa which asked, little, if any thing, w 4 • . s. d. s.d. Potatoes (per cwt.) 3 0 to 6 0 Cabbages (12 heads) 1 0 2 0 liorseßadah (bundle) 1 0 3 6 Celery 0 6 1 3 Brocoli Carrots (12 bunches) 4 0 6 0 Turnips 2 0 3 6 Onions Coleworts or Greens Leeks 0 8 1 0 Sweet Oranges (100) 4 0 6 0' Lemons 7 0 14 0 English Walnuts 1 0 1 9 s. d. s. d. Spinage (half-sieve) 0 6 tol 0 Small Onions 1 3 2(1 Apples, Common 1 6 3 0 Ditto, Choice 0 0 6 0 Pears 1 6 7 0 Span. Chesnuts (peck) 3 0 6 0 French ditto 2 6 5 0 French Walnuts 2 6 4 0 Spanish Hazleroits 3 0 4 6 Walnuts unshelled 5 0 9 0 Grapes (per lb.) Filberts (121b5.) 7 0 12 0 HAY MARKETS.—.(A ST. J A .f. s. s Lowland Mean. Hay 3 10 to 4 5 Upland Ditto 4 0 S 0 Rye_grass Hay 4 0 5 0 New Meadow Hay 310 410 , A limited supply, and a steady trade; prices as on Thursday, t per Load of 36 Trussoo. ) MESS. s. s. Clover Hay......,., 4 oto 5 15 Oat Straw .... . 1 6 110 Whea; Ditto llO 113 SMITHFIELD. a. S. s. Lowland Mead. Hay 3 Oto 3 15 Cloy. Hayrienerally 4 5t05 10 tiPttial Ditto 3154 15 Do. extra fine...... 005 15 R ye-gr as . Hay 315 415 Oat 5traw............ 1 6 1 8 New Meadow Hay 310 4 0 Wheat Ditto . .... 1 8 110 Supply good, trade very del , and pie ce as fa.; quoted. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. HUNTING APPOINTMENTS TOK THE ENSUING WEEK. His Majesty's Stag-hounds will meet on Monday, at Laleham,' near Staines ; Friday, at Fullmer Conimon—at half-past 10. The Brighton Harriers, on Monday, Rear Pateham • Wednesday, near the Race Course ; Friday, near the Dyke—gnarlier before 11. The Lewes Brookside Harriers, on Monday, at New market Hill ; Wednesday, at Ashcombe (the alternate Wednesday at the Kennel, Ilford) ; Friday, at Telescombe Ty ,....b a lf.past 10. The Worcestershire Fox-hounds, en Monday, at era combo ; Thursday, at Cliffey Wood ; Saturday, at Grafton The Warwickshire Fox-hounds, on Monday, at Grove past 10. Mr. Dansey's Wands, on Monday, at England's Gate ; Wednesday, Hearwithy; Friday, ht Canon Froome-10. :jai:l:ll—la:if-past 10. The Cottesmove Hounds, on Monday, at Uffington Wood ; Tuesday, at Cole's Lodge ; Thursday, at Castle Bythany; Friday, at Burley—quarter before 11. Lord Yarborough's Hounds , on Monday, at Laceby Cottagers' Platt; Wednesday, at Immingh am ; Friday, a t Girsby . House ; Saturday, at Cabourn--1 1. SIXTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE SHEFFIELD Suausizanz Cum.—On Wednesday the Members of this Club held their Anniversary Dinner, at the Tontine Inn, Sheffield; in the course of which Mr.Bunata, Manager of the Theatre in that town, in returning thanks for the honoer of his health being drank, incidentally remarked, that he feared Mr. KEAN'S indisposition would be fatal. Among other toasts given with enthusiasm were, " Sir WALTER, SCOT T ," and the Reverend Mr. CRoLr, and the living dram at i c aut h ors o f th e pr esen t d ay ." The meeting was well att en d e d, an d k e pt up to a l a t e hour. TIIE MURDER AT BLACKHEATH. VESTRY MEETING AT GREENLVICH--(bAST NIGHT.) (ExcLusiv . E.) Last eveaing at seven o'clock, pursuant to notice, a meeting of the parishioners of Greenwich took place in the, VeStryi to make quarterly rates, and to transact other parochial business, at the conclusiohOf which a most important discussion took place, rela riVe to some chards that had heel' made against the. Governors and DireCtori of the poor of the parish concerning their conduct, in their parochial capacity, towards the unhappy woman, Mary Ann Dale, who stands charged with the wilful mulder of her illegiti inate child o❑ Plablcheath. Mr. WILLIAM RICHIE was called to the Chair: Mr. W. QRIFFITII, of Deptford-bridge, rose and said, that the business for which the Vestry had been called having been disposed of, he begged to call the attention of the Meeting to a subject he con sideked one of th►e utmost 61361:lance to tte paiish i and required their particular attention. He only regretted that the task of bringing it before :their notice had not fallen into better bands, but he trusted that the Chairman would conceive his conduct consistent, and that of a gentleman. Mr: Griffith begged leave to read the copy of a letter he had sent to the authorities then present, intimating that he should, on this occasion, attend and bring forward the im portant Subject. (Read, read.) Mr. G. then read the following letter, which was sent to the Officers and Governors of the Parish on Wednesday morning last : GENTLEMEN—As there is a Vestry called for next Fri day evening, I think it is a . duty I owe to you to inform you of my intention (if I am not prevented from attending) t o put certain questions relative to your discontinuing the payment for the maintenance of the child that was found drowned. It is a subject of the highest importance to the parish that the, same should be investigated, in older, if possible, to allay that feeling of dissatisfaction which is so very prevalent in consequence of what transpired on the in ques t. I hope this notification will not be construed in the least personal, or in any other view, than thatof wish ing to afford you an opportunity of giving a public expla nation of the real facts of the case. I am, Gentlemen, yours, &c. W. GRIFFITH. Mr. GRIFFITH. then continued, and observed, that his object in writing the above letter was to prepare the Governors to meet the question, and thereby enable them to answer it fully. He would frankly acknowledge that those gentlemen who fill the office of Governors and Overseers of the poor, had an important and difficult task to perform, and he felt satisfied that the gentlemen in the present legislation had 'acquired great discrimination in mat ters connected with their official duties; but he would assert that, in his opinion, that discrimination had not been used in the case of the unfortunate woman Mary Ann Dale. It was well known, that whenever a female was found to be pregnant of an illegitimate child, it is the duty of the officers of the parish to cause her to affiliate that child to its reputed father, and by law the parish could commit her to the House of Correction—(No, no, from several voices.) He understood it . was the law; but this he knew of his own knowledge, that if a woman swears a child to a man, and in the event of his not being able to indemnify the parish froth its burthen, the parish can commit him to prison till he finds the required sureties. In the present instance the woman had never been called upon to swear the-child, but she declared to the parish officers who lie actually was; a negociation takes plan between him and the parish, and he pays a - certain sum of money to the officers to assist in its maintenance. The poor wo man, after she was delivered of the unfortunate de ceased, was allowed, for the first two years of its life, two shillings per week, at the expiration of which time its grandmother took him under liercare, and for the last two years and three quarters the weekly allowance was reduced .to eighteen pence, „which she was clearly-entitled th—and if what the, unhappy woman asserted upon the Inquest was true, he had no hesitation whatever in as serting that she had been treated with the greatest injustice. He did not entirely grOund his opinion upon what he had read in the newspapers, which have for some time teemed with reflections upon the parish; but lie had taken great pains in -eliciting facts which were uncontrovertible, and he would now lay them before the Meeting. j,„" On Tuesday week, the 13th of November, antecedent to Friday the 23d, on the evening of which the child was drowned, Elizabeth Dale left her place. On the next day (Wednesday) she took the child to the workhouse to be admitted, which was refused. On the next evening (Thursday) the grandmother, hearing that her daughter was lodging at Mrs. Allen's, in Thames-street, and she having arrears due to her of 28s. from her daughter, went with another woman, named M'Cann, taking the child with her, and left it there. Mrs. M'Cann stated to Mrs. Allen that the grandmother could not afford to keep it, nor could she, and as its mother, Elizabeth Dale, was there, she must take the child. At this time, a Mrs. Hewson was present, who resides at No. 2, Davenport place, Thames-street, assisting Mrs. Allen in her washing, and who is the woman who first identified the child as being that of Eliz. Dale, and though confined by the constable in the first instance, was by some mistake not examined at the inquest. She states, that as the mother appeared to be unwilling to take the child, she said, Poor little fellow, if nobody will keep him I will ;' and after some other con versation the child was shout to go, the mother said (pushing the dear little fellow) go along then,' and he was then taken away by Mrs. Hewson 'a little boy and girl. During the evening, Elizabeth Dale said to Mrs. Allen and Hewson she was married, and that she did not want her husband to know that she had got a child. On therFriday morning, Nov. 16, Mrs. Hewson went to Mrs. Allen's, and proposed to its mother to take the child, to provide for it in board, lodging, and washing, at four shillings a week; or if she would find hint in food, she would lodge him for a shilling a week. The mother said she could not afford to pay it, and the child must go to the poor-house. The poor boy remained with Mrs. Hewson till the Wednesday morn% ing following, when she sent the child back to its mother at llrs. Allen's, owing to the tide coming into her house, and not being able to keep him ; at the same time knowing the mother was going to, leave that evening, without any person knowing where she was going. During the time the hey was at Mrs. Hewson's, his mo ther supplied him with food. In the evening of this day Elisabeth Dale Ica Mr. Allen's house, without taking the poor child her; but she cams for him on the Thurs day evening, and proceeded, it appears, to one Johnson, or .Th ei nneon, a sailor, in Leek's-court, opposite the Church, ' and wan t e d to leave the child with them. The family said, ' though they had often fed the dear child when it was almost starving at its grandmother's, still they bad it net in their power to do so any longer—besidec, they had no bedding.' The brutal mother replied, ' Then let hint lay ' on the door, or any wh ere e l se .' They said, ' No, dear child, that he shall not; if we have no convenience for him to sleep, he shall not lay on the floor.' The mother then took the child away. In all instances when any of the parties persuaded her to take the child to the officers, she said it was of no use, they had taken off the allow ance, and would not take hint into the workhouse." These facts, said Mr. GRIFFITHS, I have elicited. He then adverted, in strong terms, to the neglect pur sued by the parish officers, in not explaining, at the moment, the assertion made by the unhappy woman upon the Coroner's Inquest that the pay ments bad been withheld from her, and that they had refused to take the child i n t o the house,—if they had, it would have prevented th e i r exposure, and the disgrace that must inevitably f a ll upon them unless the matter is fully answered. fhe fact of the payment of her weekly allowance having been withheld from her by the parish officers of Green wich has been echoed far and near, and the country cried with it. A person, a friend of his, living at j Greenwich, met a gentleman in London, and he im mediately said, " I say, why, what have your of fivers been at, th e y h a ve got th emse l ves into sad dis grace ?" There was evidently great culpabil i ty ' some I where, and it was th e ir duty to explain and do away with the imputation tinder whi c h t h ey now l a id , an d he considered he was deserving the thanks of the Vestry, in instituting the inquiry, as it gave them I an opportunity of doing so. As a father, and a pa rishioner, he should have had no peace in his _mind I had he not brought it 4 forward. It would not rest here, unless it was fully expinined, " The sUbject will be brought before i<fie Grand Jury at Maidstone, and you will hear what they *in say to yon." Mr. ORIFPITH they read a paragraph from two Sunday papers which tended to show that the parigi had acted very unjustly in withholding the payment of the weekly allowance &dm' the woman. A voice eiclainied—" That is lttgi like the news papM.l? Al Cientleman WWI. laid the statement against the parish itidst certainly requiret; pn answer.— (Certaiply, certainly ; ficati all parts.) Mr% GRIFFITH, in continuation; repeated, that he thought the parish officers ought to be protrcl in his having brought the subject tapoit the carpet." lie had been told that the woman applied ell Wednes day, the 21st November, at the Committee-room, 10 have the child admitted into the house, stating, that,she was now married and that her husband did not kti6w she had ,a child, and it was for the peace and comfort of lioth that she wished it to be taken in, Tim CHAIRMAN.—Pray, Il t Griffithi were you present present at the Committee-room, and heard all this Mr. GRIFFITH admitted he was not, he was told it for troth. That on the application being made, she was told to pioduce her certificate of marriage, and then her child woithlbli titkett into the poor house.. The poor woman then r'en't away, and knowing she had told a gross falsehood, we afraid to apply again —but next morning she applied to Mr. Bassett, the Assistant-overseer, for her weekly stipend, *hen he told her he had received order., not to pay her till she firtiduced her certificate. She then hawked the child about front dire to the other, but could get no one to take it. See what tI ditua. tion she Was in--money she bad none—she was driven to extremity; she dared not see the gentle men again, having told them she was married and was not. If it is proved that the ls. 6d. was with held from her, I Mean to allege that it was an act of great initatite towards the woman, and an act which I should regret much should it ever be established in this or any other parish. In addition to the charges he had made, he thought it highly impro per that the officers of the parish who had refused to allow for, and take the child into the poor-house, should sit as Jurors on the body, and return averdict against the mother. Mr. Griffith concluded his speech, by hoping that the parish authorities would give that explanation that would destroy the ob loquy that had been cast upon them.—(Applause.) Mr. FIELD said, that at the time the woman made the assertion that her money had been stopped, it would have been inquired into, had not a gentleman present (one of the officers) said that the money had been paid to her up to that time. Mr. KAIMELL now rose, and silence having been obtained, he addressed the meeting as follows : " Mr. Chairman, having been present at the meet ing when the application was made by the unhappy woman Dale, 1 am perhaps as well acquainted with the real facts of the case as any one present. I will, with your leave, give the gentleman an answer,and one Which I hope will satisfy his mind, as well as that of all our fellow-parishioners and the p i tiblic at large, that no undue or improper severity was exer cised towards the unfortunate woman in question, taking all the circumstances of the case into fair consideration. As, far as my recollection goes, and I believe I am tolerably correct , upon it, the application, and the observations made upon it by the Committee, occurred in this manner:-- Elizabeth Dale entered the room with the chi ld, and said, " Gentlemen, I am come, and want to put the child into the house." Answer was made, "My good woman you are receiving Is. 6d. a week the child, therefore we cannot - think of taking it into the house; you are a strong healthy woman, and able to support it; •we shall continue the ls. 6d., and you must do your part towards keeping it."-- She then said, "I am married now, and my husband will not let me keep the child, and therefore I must put him into the house." An observation was then made that she then appeared far advanced in preg nancy, to which she replied, that she was pregnant by a young man named. Ankinson, who had since married he_,r three months ago, and that she lodged at No. 6, Roan-street, and that she expected to be confined in December. It was then repeated that the child could not be taken into the house; that if she was married, as 'the stated, the husband had better attend, in order to some arrangement being made with him, or, at all events, that when she ap plied to Mr. Bassett, on the following Monday, for the Is. 6d., as usual, she, should then pro duce her certificate of her marriage, that the Committee might be perfectly satisfied that she really was married. I have it from Mr. Bassett (who is here to answer if called upon), that she did apply on the Monday as usual; that on his asking her, ‘ Where is the certificate ?" her answer was, " I have not brought it, and I don't know what right or what business the Committee .have with it." Mr. Bassett then, as I presume he was in duty bound to do, says, " then I cannot pay you the ls. 6d. till you have been before the Committee again on Wednesday." On Wednesday she did not attend, and on Saturday the child was found drowned. I therefore contend that there was no stoppage of the money, and I have my private notes taken at the time to prove no such thing was in tended or thought of. That: the payment - was suspended from the Monday to the Wednesday we will not attempt to deny; but we think every rea sonable man .will go with us in saying, that Mr. Bassett acted perfectly right in doing as he did. Thus far, Sir, 1 have spoken to the more immediate facts ; but I feel justify the to public.j ourselves and r a w e n f c d r a o i a n u r r e f r c o o m n L a w a d c d t upon by the constable, stating that he should put the of i e n ial g llte i lle fe e w yllep :: , o li rds more. When called names of the parish officers on the list for the Jury, I told him I thought it would be injudicious so to do, it being a parish case, but that I should feel it my duty to attend the inquest, in case the Coroner should require an answer to any questions—and I did attend. An observation fell from one of the gentlemen of the Jury, which I thought would lead to some questions being asked of the parish officers ; and I then said to that gentleman (Mr. Morris), who sat immediately before me, -" We are I gt h avelitttiousancircyquumessttaionici.:: as the public papers have stated that the parish of ficers did not attempt to explain before th e C oroner prepared thought toit right give t a o n mention an s wer why they had refused the wom an t h e par i s h allow ance: I conceive, Si r , (but I may b e i n error ) , t h ey had no right t o i nter f ere , un l ess ca ll e d upon b y the e Coroner ; and having stated this much to one of the jury, !that gentleman was certainly quite competent to acquaint the Coroner with our presence, had he required any evidence from us. I tun sorry, Sir, to take up so much of your time, but I must make an au observation or two more. Gentlemen will bear in mind that we have in our official capacity of officers and governors, to legislate for a two-fold interest— the parish and the pauper—equally bound to support the interest of one as the other. Such at least, Sir, jtu u rsm n t hbeep certainaetntpt entirely r e e i il r yl - 1 arc the principles on which I am desirous of acting; ify ust but if the refusal of relief (putting it in the strongest loc i fisgienalliiletsi)st useless for cro t sc h i e ievi go and sit there, if they are destroying a child, there is an end, in my opinion, not to use their discretion in certain cases which come before them. In the case now before us, there was certainly a temporary suspension of the weekly allowance—but for what purpose ? Why, to compel ft base woman, :An was suspected, (and it appears justly so) of being about to burden the parish with another illegitimate child, it was to compel her by the most likely means, to bring that document which (had her tale been true) she could easily have done that very day, to convince the committee that she was married, and if married, the husband could then sh have been called up, and probably some terms made lt i p l e a e l l t r ne i n ans yl legislation, nsnen:llfstottreoe with him, which would have been more advan tageous to the parish than taking the child i nto th e house. And I will further ask you, is the bold and hardened harlot to come before you with the same claim that the forlorn widow, the worn-out labourer, the helpless orphan is entitled to ? is the wanton stiumpett who, year after year, presents you with an additional burthen, the result of her illicit intercourse—is this shaMeless character, I may, to come before you witla the Orrie Clain] that those, the legitimate claiments on the pool hews, . are ent i tled to ? N o; if t h ey were not sometimes r epu l sed, they would gladly avail themselves of your p e ; asylum ul to deposit there their hapless offspring, an d for what ? that freed frefir the incumbrance, th ey m i g h t return to the path of Virtue 'and gain' an honest livelihood? No. lam sorry id see, from the short experience I have had in parochial Affairs, it is too often, to re turn to the same unhallowed course, again to revel in foul prostitution, and again, as the natural results of such practices, to come before yow, and sa y I want to swear another child to its father. He trusted that he had explained the matter to the sa tisfaction of the parishioners and to the public at large."—(lmmense applause followed Mr. ksd well's ,speech.) As soon as silence could be obtained, M. BENNETT rose.---He would ask, were the officers warranted in asking who was the father of the child, and whether_ they were warranted in asking for the certificate, which was very easy for her to produce. He considered they had a right. He could but confess his opinion, that it was a pity that this question should be brought forward now when the unhappy woman was about to be tried: He would wish it to be distinctly understood, that the money never was stopped from her. The days of payment for illegitimate children are Mondays, and when she applied, the was told to call on Wed nesday, when she would have had it, had she but have called, but she nevet did. He could say a deal more, but he thought it highly improper when the woman was almost upon her trial for her life. He considered the parish officers had acted properly on the occasion. He thanked Mr. Griffith most heartily. for having brought the subject forward, as it had given the officers an opportunity of clearing their characters. Mr. GRIFFITH replied, observing that he felt great gratifteation in his mind in hearing that .Mr. Bennett and his colleagues had not ordered the money t o h e stopped, and he did not hesitate now to declare, after the explanation that had taken place, that had be been in the same situation, he should have acted similarly ; but he really thought Mr. Bamett ought not to have suspended the payment from Monday to Wednesday, without orders from the Committee ; besides, Mr. Moze declared on the inquest the money was paid up to that period. Mr. MozE denied having said so. He said it had not ben stopped. . . Mr. Gittiirrit, in continuation, said, he hailed with pleasure the explanation that had been given, and he hoped it would be promulgated, through the means of the Press, all over the kingdom. The CHAIRMAN moved a vote of thanks to. Mr. Griffith, for his conduct in causing the inquiry, which was seconded by Mr. BENNETT, and was folloWed . by applause. Many of the gentlemen spoke in the highest terms of the humane conduct of Mr. Bassett, the assistant overseer. At about half-past nine the meeting separated, highly gratified at its issue. WINDSOR, DEC. 7:—His MAJESTY left the Royal Lodge this afternoon at two o'clock, accompanied by the LORD STEWARD, in his pony phaeton, for a drive in the Great Park. Nis MAJESTY took an airing yesterday for upwards of two boars, and visited Virginia lirattr and Sandpit Gate. To-morrow the Kists is expected to in spect the improvements at the Castle. His MAJESTY will arrive. at St. James's. Palace on Thursday next, in order to hold a Council, and receive the Recorder's Report. The Duke and Duchess of CLARENCE came to town yesterday morning from their seat in Bushy Park. His Royal Highness was busily engaged throughout tke whole of the day transacting official business at the Ad miralty. The Duchess of CLARENCE, accompanied by the Princess EMILIE of CAROLATH and Prince HOORNLOHE LAUGENBOURG, visited the Princess FitODORI3, at the apartments of her Royal mother, the Duchess of Karts, in the King's Palace at Kensington, for the purpose of con gratulating the Princess on the return of her Natal Day. The Royal Party afterwards partook of a Ddeune. the evening the Duchess of KENT gave u Grand Dinner in honour of the Day to several Members of the Royal Family, and a select party of persons of distinction, who were in vited on the occasion. Prince LEOPOLD came to town yesterday from his seat at Claremont. The Princess AUGUSTA took an airing yes terday in her carriage and four, end paid a visit to the Princess Sarnia, at her apartments in the King's Palace at Kensington. The Duke of CLARENCE dined with the Princess Auousra on Thursday, at her residence at the King's Palace, St. Jantes'e. Prince LinvEN had a Dinner Party on Thurs day, at Ashhnrnham House, Dover-street. Among whom were—The Marquis and Marehionosa PALAIELLA, Count and Countess MUNSTER, Count Omura, Mr. DE BEL LEHI', Mr. FALCE, and Mr. ROTH. The Countess of ESSEX had a Card Party yes terday evening, at her house in Hill-street, Berkeley-square. Lord MOUNTCHARLES is appointed to attend Don Minim., in his passage to, and during his residence at, this Court. His Royal Highness the LORD HIGH AD MIRAL ban appointed Lieutenants to his Majesty's steam reasele. The following Officers have received their com missions for the undermentioned vesaela—Lieutenant T. BULLOCK, Ik) the Echo; Lieut. G. J. HAY, to the Meteor ; GEORGE EVANS, to the Lightning. FASHIONABLE ARRIVALS.—The Marquis of Bath, at his residence in Grosversor-aqvisre, from a long tour ; Viscount Duegarvon, in Hertford-street, Irons Ox ford; Lord Wharneliffe and Mr. Stuart Wortley, ix Cur ton-street, May-fair, from Yorkshirs; Lord and Lady Grenville, at their house in Charles-street, Berkeley-square, from their seat, Dropmore, MIA, ; Honourable Thomas n i vs iPs t limlG :! uor , ri t r i n.ras t i o. se irv :vA t a i i;i3 An d igue allmbdegArliufsPlAn;l'rsatar.tha:tsiilana.lsjosCldnili.idaisSg3pl1 Cap tai n Construe t c aicoa i s p P tru n iouiss;r ps At , j o °CP a r f ais l u i ntan : ; n n - r Ci dk a :sc H e ri r a nnil l ' l eß e l i li v s i n' rl a l e t iC e mil f n f rPa,ol:lroGddlinray.l'kl-it'sfie Charles -street, t h im te:a i 'r t. o :l:ffli i Pr n o rT milmß : c : Ile r c .i t ß.: * Di iksortpferfmr:lltoaettea:rpttal;: amolibieterthaßllia;fr,Hßo.nzion.raiiiiilepalai..mel Stuart Wor n ] s fa r i l r .. ;R:faßjasorhAleitgkho,t, ini p A i l c b c 7 in le-street, fr t .Y:' in May- Colonel Cavendish, at Burling ton House, from Ce Canterbury; e rhur Paris; y f ß ro o ru tue lh e p i i c o r n a i d a ili n yl.r from en Paris ti d t s . ...;. Mrs. and Miss Whitmarsh, , fromr.atr c ee p t r , n w fr n f i z Sussex; Prince Esterhasy, fiasco the Cottage of the K i ng , at Chandos H ouse; Si r Andrew Barnar d, i n St. James's-- street, from Wi n d sor; M r. and Mrs. Ri c ketts, in Harley street, from P ar i s; the Honourab l e T. Fiennes, at the Royal Hotel, St. James's-street, from Yorkshire ; Wick ham Martin , E . at ditto, from Hants ; J. A mes, E sq . E s ditto, fro m his seat in Bedfordshire ; Cap t . F itzelarentv , at ditto, fronts th e Mediterranean ; Frederick Williams, sq. at Fenton's H o t e l , St. J a mes ' s -street, from Brighton. DEPARTURES.--The Duke of Devonshire, Major Henry Murray, for Portsmouth ; Major and Mrs. for Cowdray H a ll, in . Sussex, the meat of Mr. Poyntz ; Fraser, for Bath ; Alajor and Mrs. Bristow, for Bath ; Captain Drake, for Pertains Barracks; Lord and Lady King and Miss King, from their house in Dover-street, for their seat, Ockham, Surrey ; Lord Yarborough, from the Isle of Wight, fur his seat in Lincolnshire; Sir Roge r them to clear the and Lady Greeley, for Lulworth Castle ; Captain l3rymer, from the Royal Hotel, for his seat in Leieeetershire ; :tr. and Mrs. Shand, from ditto, for Paris; J. Molloy, E.,. tebaysedothberys tuhregiringi Mportanity, they e from ditto, on a tour ; Capt. Caldx 4 ell, from ditto, on a tot t r. BUN MOT.—At the close of the Concert, et , w , e v r h e e f n o , llo a w s v a l Wakefield, on Friday evening last, two persons entered for the purpose of removing the seats preparatory to the ball ; i t . l o ' o cy m el hired, 4 , the forums," at the sa wn , ti me lirtin themll- Ilp and carrying them, away. A gentl eman, whi!st w a if his carriage, turned to a friend and asked him, " F theseinf; r porters were like newly elected members o f 7 l y parliament?" This strange question he hail himself to R answer, " Because th e y took their oaths and. seats together .".— Leeds Jo teiliyencer.