The Sun. — London, England, 1825-07-23 00:00:00

TH E LONDON JOUlt NA DAILY Extractg from the Morning,. PaperssJuly [BRIM," PRF-SS.i The Catholic Association, it seems, gain no ground among the well-informed persons in Ire land, not withstanding the philanthropy of their avowed purpose—that of producing peace and concord among all classes. Their proceedings do certainly not promise to realize this vision of pacific empire. Mr. O'Connell and his friends have t. 'lked out a pretty broad line of conduct for their public labours ; but to begin with evading a statute enacted for preserving the tran quillity of Ireland, is to afford rather an omi nous prelude to subvert, to the utmost of their means, the authority of a Legislature, and rather en equivocal sample of their sincerity in preach ing up obedience to the laws. The Catholic chief tains put forth, as one of the prominent features of their plan, that of numbering their population, that its gross amount ►nay be the more correctly compared with that of the Protestants. It is ex pected, no doubt, that on counting these le gions, the latter will bow their haughty crest, and that the British Parliament will be induced to accede to those claims, which upon a calculation of prudence it may be deemed unsafe any longer to withhold. But, in truth, vre should expect no such result from this display. Catholic con cession was never discussed as u question of num bers ; it has always been made to rest on consi derations of a very different nature. That causes —great and just causes—of complaint exist in Ireland, cannot be denied, and their removal must ever be an object of anxious desire to the most enlightened minds. The true bearings of the question of Catholic Emancipation have never been placed, as it appears to us, in their true and proper light by either of the leading parties, whether of its advocates or its enemies. The friends of the Catholic cause insist on the in justice of excluding any class of subjects from any offices of trust and profit in the State on the ground of their religion : while their op ponents, on the other hand, contend that the re ligion of the State, being established by law, must be upheld and protected by the law, which, for this purpose, is justified in excluding from the higher offices of Government all persons of a dif ferent religious creed, inasmuch as their weight and influence, when invested with power, may be employed to purposes hostile to the interests of that Church which the Government has pledged itself to the nation to maintain. Taking these opposite grounds of opinion, both parties may argue plausibly and without end ; while the ninny, who would gladly make up their minds conscientiously on one side or the other, could they come to any satisfactory conclusion, are left at the mercy of the last argument, on whichever side It be : those who undertake, for the time, to think for them, interweaving quite enough of truth into their reasoning to prevent their think ing for themselves.—That every man should be permitted to worship God in his own way, and according to that form which he conscientiously believes to be acceptable to him, is a truth which we should be sorry to hear controvert ed. It is a truth which every honest and enlightened Statesman must admit ; it is a truth to which the Clergy of our Established Church most readily subscribe. - But, this being granted, does it not follow that no class of per sons in the State ought to be subjected to any civil disabilities on account of their religion ? Assuredly it does. On what ground, then, it is asked, is it that the religion of the Roman Ca tholics is made to disqualify its members from holding those offices to which the law has declar ed them inadmissible ?—Here it is that we pause. It is in reply to this home question, arising out of a chain of reasoning perfectly logical, that it becomes necessary to take those important dis trtictions a hich can alone enable us to reply to it as we ought—that is, fairly, intelligibly, and without shrinking from any one consequence which the premises involve. We say, then, that it is not the religion of the Roman Ca- tholics that either gave rise to their exclusion from high official power, or that still cc-dinues in force the remaining disabilities of w hich they so urgently complain. It is the political doctrines engrafted on that religion, and which have, from the very origin of the Popish councils in which they Were framed, be( o made subservient to the worst excesses of spiritual tyranny—it is these, and the bulls, sentences, confessions, absolutions, interdicts, and dispensations which follow in their train, that inspired that dread of the re-admission of the Catholics to power and place, and which bolted the doors of preferment against them with such decided force. Every religion, in its essence, must combine a'regard for man with its love of the Eternal Being whom it worships—it is not, therefore, against the religion of the Roman Ca tholics that those laws are still retained from which they seek to be emancipated : it is against those - bigotted and sanguinary principles which have governed the Roman Church from its com mencement, and which will govern it to the end —it is these, and the dread array of spies, inqui sitors, and confessors, which are identified with its hierarchy, that Protestants fear to encounter, and which they would faiu keep at , arm's length. The religion of the Catholic, viewed in the ab stract, has in it the essence . of Christianity— it has within it, consequently, the whole of those. moral precepts which Christianity en joins; it is not, therefore, against the re ligion of Ireland—identified in all that is essen tial with their own—that the Protestants of England stand upon their guard. No; it is to the complete dominion over the conscience which the intriguing pastors of that communion exer cise, and the studious care with:Which they k ee p down the tower classes in that. state of servile ig norance, which makes them at all times the fit tOOls, as well as the ready instruments of their priesthood, to whatever service ,they may be called; it is to this, and to the danger arising • out of it, that they look with alarm, and against which ..they seek security in those remaining laws which they refuse to surrender to the Ca tholic claims. Doctor Troy-, in his celebrated Pastoral Letter of 170, says that the religious .. • concerns of Ireland are regulated by a College of Cardinals at Rome. In our opinion, however, the reign of spiritual and temporal usurpation, as far as the Holy Pontiff is concerned, is pretty well at an end, but is the hatred of heretics ex tinguished? Is the spirit of proselytism less ac tive ? Is the belief in miracles less implicit ; or is the machinery of Popish superstition played off with less success on the ignorant peasantry of Ireland at this day, than it has been for ages past ? Have not the Jesuits, under the present Pontiff, Leo XII., gained an ascendancy in the Roman States, and in all the Catholic States of the Continent—France among the foremost, — that threatens to throw Europe back half a cen tury in the progress of civilization ? Let not those among the Catholic leaders, who wish to lay hold of popular disquietude to speed forward the cause they advocate—let them not urge that it is to their religion, as Catholics, that our laws are hostile. It is not the truth. The leading doctrines of that religion make a part equally of the Protestant and Catholic faith. They are to he found in that Gospel which they both equally revere. The attack made upon the Catholic power at the Reformation was not against the exterior form of worship, or against the tenets of religious belief which accompanied that wor ship. It was against the insolent dominion of the Romish Church—the overwhelming tyranny of its priesthood—the imperious despotism which they exercised over the freedom of opinion—the extortionate purposes to which they applied all the mystic symbols of the faith—the system of fraud, artifice, oppression, and intermeddling by which they got the direction of the conduct and conscience of the people, and possessed them selves of every avenue to wealth and authority in the State—all this it was, combined with the mer ciless bigotry of the Popish Clergy, and the im pious pretensions of the Papal power, that made England rise to rescue herself from a dominion which trampled her in the dust. We have been induced to go into this subject at some length, from our anxiety to remove a misconcep tion which is fruitful of mischief and of false reasoning. But having said thus much, we would ask Mr. O'Connell, and the leading members of the Catholic aristocracy, with whom he acts, whether, in this view of the sub ject, those who are hostile to the grant of any power to the Irish Catholics beyond what they at present possess, are likely to be conciliated by any arguments drawn from their superior num bers—frOm their facility of levying contributions —from the concentration of their strength by as sociations—and from the imposing attitude which they would fain assume before the British Par- liament ? If they are kept out of power from a dread of the use they might make of it, is it worse hi the Catholics to make a parade of the muster-roll of their population, of their financial resources, and of all the well-concerted means which they have of becoming the ruling power in Ireland ? We would entreat them to reflect upon the course they are pursuing. Neither our space nor our leisure will permit us to pursue the sub ject further at present, but occasion enough will be presented to us of recurring to it. [NEW TIMES.] It is gratifying to observe that the foreign po licy of England, under the direction of Mr. Canning, extorts applause even from those wri ters who are unable to appreciate the princi ples in which it originates. We some time since remarked, that the Constitutionnel was wrong in supposing that Mr. Canning had taken Mr. Charles Fox as his model: the French Journalist says, 64 the Nem Times has misunderstood us, and we shall therefore enter into an explanation of our meaning." Now this explanation is nothing more than a long and la boured mis-statement of Mr. Pitt's principles, founded on the false idea " that the object which he proposed to himself throughout the whole of his life was the abasement of France." it is somewhat singular, that the opposite parties in France should fall into the very same error. The real object of Mr. Pitt was to inaintain the British Constitution, and to raise his country, not on the ruins of any other nation, but by means of advancing general civilization and hap piness. During the first ten years of his power, his imaginary hatred of France was w holly im perceptible. In 1786, he negociated a com mercial treaty with that country. In 1789 the French Revolution began. Mr. Pitt was so far from seeking the destruction of France, that Ile maintained the strictest neutrality between the adverse parties, for nearly two years after the greater part of Europe had taken part in the war. That he secretly encouraged the Revolu tionists, and even promoted the destruction of the Bourbons, has been said, but it is as un founded a calumny as ever was uttered. When he was forced into the war by the inhuman mur der of Louis XVL, he pursued it, indeed, with inflexible firmness, but he was always ready to treat for Peace on the most liberal con ditions, and did in fact offer terms which many eminent Statesmen thought far too favour able to the enemy. There is no reason to believe, that if Mr. Pitt were now living, and at the head of affairs, his policy would be in any material point different from that of Mr. Canning; whether Mr. Fox would, if living, adopt a different system, we do not think it ne cessary to consider. Possible it is, that in the present state of the world, those two great men, were they living, might be found marching side by side in the path of an enlightened foreign policy ; but at all events it is certain, that the course pursued by Mr. Canning, in relation to the rising States of South America, is strictly in consonance with the principles of Mr. Pitt. [THE TIMES.] The New York Papers present us with a re port of proceedings in the State Legislature of Georgia, which, so far, as words go, bear a me nacing aspect to the tranquillity, if not to the permanency, of the Federal Constitution. But in a. free country, be - it observed, strong language is more frequent than any other kind of violene,, and very often cures* the ill-temper which it e presses. The t:overnor of Gporgia - had scut a tn.-..si•age to the noti , e of 4-1 op ro. •fl lativt;s, chart. ing with impropriety the interference exercised' by r the General Government of the United States in the internal concerns of Georgia, and announc ing, that as the Georgians " had exhausted argu e ment, they ought to stand by their arms." This message being referred to a Committee, a Re port and Resolution were founded on it, couched in the most menacing and even warlike terms towards the General Government. The details of these documents are inserted in another co lumn. With respect to the reasoning contained in them, we can collect nothing, but that the po licy of the Central Government is at variance with what the Georgians consider their rights and interests, and that if the difference should proceed in its present course, it must lead to a defection of the Southern States (for all of which, including Virginia and South Carolina, the Georgian Committee professes to speak) from the other members of the Republic. The subject of dis cord is—what we are well used to at home—the opposition between the interests of those who, deal in slaves, and the sentiments of those who wish the whole system of slavery annihilat ed. But there are circumstances which render this a question of the gravest character in rela tion to the intercourse of the United States with' Foreign Powers. One or two of the Southern States have resolved, that every roan of colour who enters their harbours in a foreign ship shall be imprisoned until the ship is again ready for sailing. The King of England has thousands, perhaps, of black subjects and mulattoes, helping to navigate his commercial marine ; are they to be treated as criminals and thrown into gaol, if, in reliance on the faith of treaties, the 'vessels on board of which they serve should enter the port of Charleston, for instance ? Would England endure this ? Would the Govern ment of Washington uphold it, or go to war to enforce such cruelty and injustice ? Assuredly neither of these things would happen. Ilow, then, can the United States remain incorporated, if contradictions so radical between the whole and its parts should continue ? It is foolish to speculate on slight, or perhaps transient oc currences, as if they were fixed in the na ture of things; but undoubtedly it does ap pear, that a wise and liberal policy on many questions is that which suits the Northern States of America, yet is altogether unconge nial to the spirit and character of their slave-owning neighbours in the South. Con trarieties thus obvious and important would call for a vigorous concentration of power in the Federal Government of the Union to re concile them—that the more partial and narrow should yield to that interest which was more ex tensive and enlightened. Whether such a conso lidating force exists in the Republic as at pre sented constituted, is an inquiry of all others the most interesting and the most difficult to decide. [THE PUBLIC LEDGER.] The House of Representatives of Georgia have just come to a resolution, which shows of what frail materials thb - United States Go vernment is composed. How any body of enlightened men could have adopted such a sys tem of Government is astonishing ; but if any of them are still alive, they must now see their error; and instead of the duration, upon which they calculated, they have the certain prospect before them of its speedy extinction. Such is the plain interpretation, in Our opinion, of this important Resolution. In fact, it contains a challenge to the Northern States to separate from those in the South ; and to understand the course which is likely to be adopted in consequence, it should be known that the New England States have, more than once, entertained the design, which has been now agitated, we believe, for the first time, in the South. During the last war,, they entered into a sort of compact to this effect; and had hostilities continued, it would have been acted upon in all probability. Therefore the challenge has not been given to n lukewarm party ; and, if it have , no other consequence, it will increase the ill blood already subsisting between the Northern and Southern sections of the Union, and which has boiled over in this intemperate resolution. — The marked and studied contempt in which the . New Englanders are spoken of in this import ant document, will not be overlooked by the latter ; and these will soon return the compliment, with a cordiality which will place the Legisla ture of Georgia, and those of the Northern States, upon a perfectly equal footing in this respect. — The fiery spirits of the South will recriminate, of course ; and, in spite of the moderate men of the Union, a separation will ensue in good earnest and without further formality. One of our con. temporaries speaks lightly of this affair, because he thinks superficially, and feels slightly upon the subject himself. But "the people of whom he is speaking, and whose character he so little com prehends, will take up the matter with an acri mony of feeling, which every day will increase, and which can only be compared to the bitterness that the hig s hisi sptiit of faction, or the most un compromising political hostility, usually en genders. [MOANING POST.I Certain advices..have been received that two camps are shortly to be formed on the frontiers of France towards Spain ; but whether as Corps of Observation instead of the Army of occupa tion, or to aid it in case of need, is not at present known. Whatever the real object may be, it is an undoubted fact that orders have been received at Bayonne, for the_ immediate preparation of a camp at the do'main of Marac (about a mile from' the gates of the city), for the reception of 15 battalions of infantry, each to consist of 609 ef fective men, making in all 9,000 men. Two re giments of cavalry are also named, which will be cantoned for the sake of forage at the village of Ustartitz, about three leagues from Bayonne, and at -St. Jean de Luz. The like arrange ments are taking place on the side of Perpig nan. The arrangement of the park of Marac for a camp has actually commenced, and is conti ' ;flied with activity. A suitable train of artillery will be attached, so as to form a complete diviL. Son, at present called the 'division of . reserve. The 6111 Freorh regiment of the In., at. present ifl!.! rri!-0) at PatnplOoa, are un,ler orders to in:11'0) toM,Crid to roioforce that garrison ; thry will be replaced by a regiment immediately ex pected at Bayonne. Vittoria, Burgos, Santan der, and Corunna, daily present some disturb- ances, and the loss of lives frequently is the consequence. [MORNING HERALD.] The singular colloquy which took place a few days since between the Lord Chancellor and one of the Learned Counsel practising in his Court, whatever it ❑►ay prove in other respects, at least shows the former to possess as thorough a share of good temper and self-possession as falls to the share of any one man in ten thousand. By some, the occasion we allude to may be thought to furnish an instance of the manly indepen dence of the Bar. Be it so. We would not for a moment insinuate or imagine that any thing which the Chancellor ever said or did in a memorable cause between the Gentleman in question and the Regent's or some other Canal Company, could in any way influence the feelings or conduct of the latter ; but we may be permit ted to doubt the propriety and good taste, if not the policy and justice, of choosing the Court of Chancery itself, with the Judge seated on the Bench, as the proper place for reading him a lecture, and that in terms so unmeasured as these are reported to have been. It is the fashion with some people to attribute all the faults of the Court of Chancery to the Judge. The public at large—at least the unpro fessional part of it—migh be excusable for so doing. A client, tired out with the delays, the intricacy, and ex pence of a protracted suit, might be ex cused for saying to the Chancellor, " My Lord, you are the cause of all this; for, at least you do not cure it." But those who know how much both the Bar, and its immediate employers, have to do with the matter, and how largely they both profit by the system, will be inclined to doubt how far any one of these branches of the profession is entitled to heap the whole odium and obloquy upon the J udge. We repeat, that we believe the Chan-, cellor to be no further answerable for the defects and errors of the Court,than by suffering them Coex ist. Ile seems to imagine that nothing but a total reform will do ; and that because no scheme has yet been hit upon, which will at once remedy every defect, therefore nothing can be done. On the contrary, we cenceive that reform, to be avail ing, should be gradual. That the one is more like repairing, the other like pulling down the stately edifice. Est quodamprodire tenus, ii non datur ultra. Why does not the Lord Chan cellor, for instance, rid himself of the affairs of bankruptcy and lunacy ? Why does he not do something- to stop the eternal talking of Counsel, and the useless repetition of facts and arguments. Why are not useless offices abolished, which are only a source of pa tronage and expence ? Why are not desultory pleadings shortened ; and the proceedings in the Masters' offices simplified and quicken ed ? All, or some of these, perhaps, are to pics which have engaged the attention of the Commissioners who were so long► ago appoint ed to investigate the subject. And we cannot help thinking that if these Commissioners have taken up and reported upon these and other points one by one, and thus set about their re form by degrees, such a method would have been more satisfactory—at least to the present genera tion, than postponing the whole for one sweeping reform, which the greater part of the adult popu lation, including the Commissioners themselves, may never live to witness or partake of. [MORNING CIIRONICLL] The Rev. E. R. Butcher has addressed a Letter to a Contemporary from Brixton Grove, Surrey, in which he says— • " I claim no merit for having been an unwilling prosecutor, but as a contrary inference is attempted to be raised, allow me to say, that the Worthy Magistrate who committed the prisoner thought it right to bind me over to prosecute, observing, that it was a duty which I owed to the public. My legal adviser in London expressed the same opinion, and gives me authority to use his name whenever it shall become necessary. It was well known with what strictness the Grand Jury investigated the whole business before they found ' a true bill.'—A witness is said to have sworn that, at the time when I said my wife was too ill to attend at the Magistrate's, she was, in fact, well enough to be, and actually was. at the house of the witness, about three quarters of a mile from her own dwelling. My answer is, that I can decidedly prove that my wife did not leave her house on that day, or the previous day, or during the two subsequent days. That Mrs. Butcher was too ill to attend the Court at Horsham, her uncle and my father will readily esta blish. They prohibited me from taking her there on account of her particular situation and extremely delicate and precarious state or health, unless the prisoner should be advised co require her attendance under a subpoena. My legal adviser before alluded to gave it as his opinion, that my wife's attendance was wholly unnecessary on my part, as both the removal and the identity of the articles were admitted, and could be sworn to by myself and other witnesses ; observing at the same time, that if the prisoner meant to set up in her defence, that the articles enumerated in the indictment, which were nearly twenty in number, and of considerable value, were given to her by my wife, her Counsel would of course direct Mrs. Butcher to be subpcenaed, in which case she must attend, or chew, by a me dical man, a sufficient cause for her absence." As it is probable this case will be brought before a Court of Justice, we will not enlarge upon the statement of the Rev. Mr. Butcher. He seems a fortunate man, for he has acted in such a man ner as to entitle him not only to the approbation of his own conscience, but also to the approbation of the Grand Jury, " who investigated the whole business before they found a true bill, with what strictness is well known," as well as to the appro bation of the Committing Magistrate. How singu lar, that the Petit Jury and some of the Magis trates on the Bench should have so far misun derstood the motives of the advice of his Coun sel, not to produce Mrs. Butcher, as to say the case was one of the most disgraceful that ever stained a Court of Justice. With every respect for Grand Juries, especially Salford Grand Ju ries, acting on the advice of the Rev. Mr. Hay, not to trouble themselves with evidence, and getting through the bills at a steam-engine rate, and believing, as we do, that the liberty of the subject cannot h e b e tt er secure d than by such a bulwark, we of course, cannot but be of opinion that the committing Magistrate does well in placing the same reliance on it. The three months' imprisonment before the Grand Jury enters on its duty is a mere nothing. There are some people, however, who think it would he amiss if Committing Magiitrates were to leave the Grand Juries a little less to do, by taking the trouble to sift a case before band, to save itthorenc e fron► unnecessary suffiering and po sihle colitt:mioation, AN ATTEMPT TO BURY A MAN ALIVE, Wednesday evening, Britain's private burial ground, Church-row, NVldtechap e l, was ma d e the scene of great uproar and confusion, which s pread through the whole neighbourhood, arising froal the following cause : It appeared that on Tuesday week a woman named Luca, was taken to the London Ho s pit a l, w h ere s h e was prov id e d every medical assistance ; yet her disease baffled the skiltof he r attendants, and she died in a day or two afterwards, and there being marks of violence about her face, the parochial authorities deemed it necessary to institute an inquiry into the real causes of her death, and on Saturday evening a Coroner's Jury se` upon the body, and after hearing the evidence of several wi t : nesses, the surgeon who had attended her in the lioapitt" clearly shewed that her dissolution was not attributable to the injuries on the face, but entirely owing to a fever which wa s very prevalent a t thi s season o f t h e year . Th e Jury accorditigi t, .„ 7 decided, that she had died from na t ura l causes , an d n ot fr° l " any violence inflicted by the husband. The result of the inquiry slid not at all satisfy the though neighbours and friends of the deceased, who persisted in staging that she h a d b een ' massacre d b y h er h us b an d , aga i nst wii°._ l 4 they vowed vengeance. All the dissentients were Irish sT, Roman C a tholi cs , wh ose o pi n i ons were muc h strengt h en ed Pi the fact, that he would not allow the body to be interred g tc ,'; cording to the Catholic rites, or even permit her to be " wakeSt as is customary among the Irish. This was the cause of di' . satisfaction among them, and the greatest confusion that a tti be pictured pr ev ailed f or th e l as t t wo or t h ree d ays, a nd °o Wednesday evening the burial of the wife took place. At the hour appointed for the funeral, all the friends of tit ° deceased assembled together, with vast numbers of their cod try-people, from all parts of London, not merely out of resr. ir to the departed, but fo r th e o s t ens ibl e purpose of wreaking t„ d vengeance on the head of the unfo r t una t e an d unoffelitt' widower. As the funeral procession moved on, the multitude inereas o e 4 and when it reached the burial- groun d, no t l ess t h a n f r o eight or ten thousand persons were present, and such was ;o , uproar, that the Rev. Mr. Nicholl, th e c l ergyman , was 'of terrupted repeatedly, while reading the service, by severalo the Irish calling out that the deceased did not belong t° rat flock. After the corpse was lowered into the grave, the gelt e dif shout was to " serve out the husband." At this signs; husband, who was the chief mourner, was seized upon, and " os t solutely forced to th e e d ge o f th e grave , t h ey us i ng the Pi o , dreadful asseverations, th a t h e s h ou ld b e b ur i e d a li ve With the wife, whilst others were prepared with shovels to fill uP grave. The poor fellow struggled with all his might , , a o f called for assistance, and f or t una t e ly a t thi s momen t a h°lo officers from Lambeth-street Office rushed forward to save of from the dreadful sentence that awaited him, in which t u to succeeded with the utmost difficulty, but not till his gortreirl were reduced to rags ; and had it no t b een f or t hi s timetY.ots terference, they certainly would have carried their purpose t_,,4 execution. The affrighted man was placed in a coach, accompanied by the officers for safety to his house. On the 22d ult. the village of Chateau-G ail ' lard, in the Commune of Belles, was totally. 01 , 11 sumed by fire. Besides the l oss o f propertli which reduces several individuals to a state great indigence, a young girl aged, about perished in the flames. The sad accident ;5 1 1 , to have been occasioned by the i m p r udence ° i woman who was heating an oven.—(Fre n " Paper.) A recent letter from Frankfort says, " A tett' days ago a serious robbery was committed h e ;: i Forcible entry was made in the middle or a t,i c night into the country-house of a m e rchant. I iron chest was broken open, and the cask7 o ' ' taken away. It contained money in the amount of about 18,000 florins (1,60 0 1 . t e a ling), the greater part of which had ill " f o r deposited with the merchant, as a securitl State paper." rie A robbery of rather a novel s or t, a nd to a 'L ir amount, was recently committed on the Su'd non. A vessel from Prince Edward's P i lo bound to Bristol, was met off the Heads o lt ict the last fevi days by a pilot boat, which -too Al on board some of the passengers who "r,i or to land. One gentleman, a Mr. Hugh l o re donald, was plundered by the boat's crew' be itl landing, of a large sum in notes and specie' il' having stated his loss to the Magistrates af:oor rush, they investigated the complaint aaciftiP' s mitred three of the men and a boy 0 th e gaol for the robbery, after examiol"4 s boat, in which they discovered four sol e ' and two guineas, part of the booty. COAL MARKET, JULY 22. •e. di Ships at Market. Ships sold r af C O?* 64i Newcastle . . 53} -30 s u`> 4, , 36 Sunderland - -25 f . 29s 0L , 1>,../ . - . COURSE ()F EXCHANGE, July t?. , ii• Itostetilant Ditto, at. Sight le 19 Rotterdam Antwerp l2 3 .4. 141 Hanthitrgh qt; 10 .1:1 9 R AMIN. 36 1 I * 4 (IPI Paris,3 Day's sight 50 e 6 i l ; Ditto flourdeaitx, ditto Berlin 7 jti le Frank fort on t lie I%laitt Pet et shurgh . , 94 , t ; Viennl ,c, , 1 „ Trieste ....• 9 61 ,, iref'• oit 1 1 Madrid . , ~ , . 37 pre . 04 Cadiz Bilboa S6I , '. Barcelona ;eville Gibraltar Leghorn Genoa . . 15 -Venice, Ital. Ur 27_ 1 Malta Ite P cr Palermo Lisbon Oporto Bio.latteiro , , 49 , Bahia •, 54 Ilnblin .... 91 Cork 4i pet Cent.. ' , 4 . ''' BULLION. n Or r . Portucal 601,1,in Cnin L.O ..., ~g .: , 3 17 lu7 Foreign Gold, in Bars 0 New Doubloons New Dollars 0 0 0 0 0 _......., Silver Sitandortl in liars. BIRTHS. ofr On the 20th inst., at Clapham-common, the lady Shebbeare, Esq, . of a daughter. On the 19th inst., at Edwinsford, Carmarthen.- Mary Hamlyn Williams, of a daughter. MARRIED. On Thursday, at Edmonton Church, the Re/ . v Jr Sp, Vyvyan, second son of the late Sir Vyell VyvYl , 1 1 Trelowarren, in the county of Cornwall, to Al c tielerii daughter of J. V. Taylor, Esq., of Southgate. 31140011.,/, On the 21st inst., at St. Helen's Church, Mr. Tri 0 07 Glover, of Bishopsgate-street, to Miss Auguo 3 the same place. DIED. 5eP , r- e On the 21st inst., Henry Harrison, Esq., of Russell-square, aged 44. On the 11th ult., in a glandular consuraptioo.Xel caela Lauriana, eldest daughter of Lieutenant - 9 3 ,10 0 On the 21st inst., John smith, Esq., of Not u t e et; . New-road, St. Marylebone, and late of John -0— in street, in the,6,sth year, of his age. On tho 12th Inst., at her house, Brown-94 - 4" Mrs. Sarah Cleghorn, in, the 97th year of her perfect possepsiOn. OCliek 7 40 0.1, Printed and Pub l 4l4lo COS OA lin OP 11/E'Vel-e;VP Orrycz, N 0.112, Stiand, D• 141'