The Sun. — London, England, 1834-06-07 00:00:00

what was called church property. They would seem to loot upon the shurch as though it were a corporation, and 'enjoying the rights of a corporation—the privilege of holding separate rights in property, as was the case with a corporation corporate or with a corporation sole—such rights being cognizable at law. The church, however, was no such thing. The church was merely the con gregation of the faithful ; it meent not a body of estetgy men. To talk of revenues arising, whether from tithes or oblations or any other such source of emolument, rs church property, meaning the property of a corporation, was a mode of expression most fruitful of mischievous error. If indeed persees were to talk of the clergy, here they had bodies of men, and men enjoying the rights and privileges of corporations—deans and chap ters of corporations corporate, and bi4hops and par sons of corporations sole. This he could understand as a lawyer, and this wa s t h e f act. B ut only see how great was the incon istency, how gross was the illusion of those per sons who declared it to be sacrilege to meddle with what they wesee pleased to call church property, for the purposes of one mode of appropriation, and yet express their ready ;assent to another. It was with them sacrilege to apply any surplus that might exist to charitable and pious uses, but it was no sacrilege to alter the amount distributed to the several persons, members of the church establishment. In other words, to distribute it equally among all the members of the church would be no sacrilege ; while to grant the smallest part of the revenues for any other pur pose, albeit a purpose recognised by the church, would be sacrilege of the deepest dye. Why, one was as complete an invasion of all the rights of property as the other was. There was the noble earl ( Grey), the noble duke (Wel lington), and himself. According to these doctrines, if any one were to deprive them .of all their respective properties, it would be admitted to.be robbers • " but," said these in genicus persons, "if w e t a k e a ll this property and divide it equally among you, it is no robbery at all," although the income of the noble duke may be much greater than that of the noble earl, and that of the noble earl very much greater than mine, ( Hear, hear, and laughter.) He, however, considered that it would be also robbery, dif fir.ng from the other only in degree, and he had no doubt that the noble duke and the noble earl would concur with him in that opinion. (Hear, hear, and laughter.) Ay, said some noble lords, but this inquiry c' have only one result. The very small proportion s a Pro testants throughout Ireland, and the large on'imint of the revenues received for their spiritual ins truc tion, must be known, and it will follow that all es,en will see that there is a surplus W ell, then, at t`eie worst, let it be applied to the purrees of education and charities belonging to the est ablieeed church. If it were so, as they apprehended, he had sio knowledge of the fact. Let them have an inquiry, wad let them await its result. The inquiry was intended to tie fax and impartial, in order to afford an opportunity to the Irish church to tell its story, as well as to those who doubted the use of that establishment as at present consti tuted to till their tale. There were so many opposite ac counts--one man maintaining there would be a great sur plus, another a moderate surplus, while a third declared there would be atone at all—that some inquiry was abso lutely necessary. But supposing there was a surplus--he was only arguing the matter hypothetically-S-if there was a surplus, as had bcen most justly and fitly said, it should first of all, if not exclusively, be applied to the purposes of religious and moral education on the principles of the established church. The source from which the fund came naturally indicated the objects to which it should be applied. (Hear, hear.) He was as great an advo cate as any one for equal instruction to all on the same level, without respect of condition or creed ; but when a fund originally belonged to the established church was t o be directed to the purposes of education, it was hat f a i r that it should first of all, if not exclusively, be app ro p r i ate d to that object within the bou n d s o f the Protestant church itself. As to the Catholic church having one single frac tion of a farthing of the fund, no noble lord who sat on that side of toe house, no not even the noble earl himself who had spoken so warmly on the subject ( Winchilsea), would more strenuously o'.kesse such a proposition than he (the Lord Chancellor , would, if such a proposition could for a moment be 'eanceived. (Hear, hear.) A reference had been made to certain great authorities—among others to Dr. F'S:ley—on the question of church establishments. That celebrated divine and ethical philosopher had main tained the doctrine, and argued it with his usual force and homely vigour of understanding, in which, if ever equalled, be certainly had never been surpassed, that an established church was necessary as contradistinguished from the voluntary system ' • but he added thi s qua lifi cat i on—t h e established church ought to be the religion of the great majority of the people. Indeed, he went so far as to say, spe,culatively no doubt, and following his principle to rather an excess, that when the religion changed the established church ought to change too, forgetting ten thousand cir euinsta .ces which should modify the proposition, and to which he had not adverted. He (Archdeacon Paley) was not the only authority upon that point ; Bishop Warbur ton held the same opinion. But he (the Lord Chancellor) disclaimed the doctrine ; at all events that was not the mo ment to moot it ' - but this he w ou ld sa y, th a t no greater curse could befall the people of Ireland, no greater danger could arise to the liberties of Ireland and England, than any thing which would tend to install the Catholic as the established religion of that country. (Hear, hear.) Liberty would not be safe, and, in his opinion as a Protestant, reli gion in such a case would be no better off than liberty. (Hear, hear.) He hoped he had now said enough to re lieve hangelf and his right hon. colleagues, all of whom agreed co the proposition, among whom there existed n o t tie slightest shadow of a:difference of opinion on the point (H ar, hear), relieve them, he said, f rom an y susp i c i on, V suspicion could still lurk after the declarations made by his noble friends on the opposite benches, that any notion of an attempt towards establishing the Catholic church had even for a single moment entered their imaginations. f Hear.) He would go further : he did not think the en lightened and liberal Catholics themselves were at all fa vourable to their religion being established as a political church. They would object to it as strongly on religious principles as any could be found to object to it on political grounds. He had been sorry to hear during the debate something like an attempt to sound a religions alarm— a religious outcry in the country, as if that were the time to make such an unholy, impolitic, pernicious, and, only on the lips of fanatics themselves, honest appeal to the religious prejudices and party zeal of the people. He re ferred to a noble earl ( Whinchilsea, as we understood), who declared that by agitation they had lost much, and therefore they might hope by agitation to get something back. The right rev. prelate, too (the Bishop of Exeter) seemel disposed to join in the new firm of politico-eccle siastical agitation. But he (the Lord Chancellor) had no great apprehension as to the result. In the first place, to agitats well had required in other instances a Very different capital from that which this new pious firm had established. Honesty might have a great deal to do, he had no doubt it had, in the signal success which had attended agitation in Ireland (A laugh); but if honesty, however great, had been the only capital applied, sure he was its "tents" would have been much less considerable. (Much laughter and cheer ing.) He was therefore comfo ted by the hope that if they p msisted in carrying their threat into active execution, their f Laure, owing to the good sense of the people of England a id Ireland, would be as signal and complete as it deserved (Hear, hear), and a defeat more signal. and more complete than it deserved he was not possessed of any language strong en )ugh to describe. ( Hear, hear.) They were about to lay the commission on the table, and then it should be car ried into effect honestly, fairly, impartially, without flinch ing as without violence, neither leaving undone nor over done, men of moderate though firm, of honest yet con ciliatory temper and habits, having b een se l ec t e d for the task ; and when that task should be performed, when their report was produced, it would remain for Government to propound, and for Parliament to determine, the course which should be pursued. No one felt more deeply than he ( the Lord Chancellor) did the loss of honest, honour able, most able, and useful colleagues, and no one could ever hail with more heartfelt satisfaction the passing away of that sload which had temporarily obscured, but without breaking, the relations that had cemented and held toge ther the members of his Majesty's Administration. ( Hear, hear.) The noble and learned lord then referred to the date of the commission, and accounted for its not having yeeeived the Privy Seal on Monday, from the fact that the noble earl ( Ripon) had not till yesterday left the service of the Crown. With that exception, however, it had been completed on Monday, when it was first announced in the other house of Parliament. But a right re verend prelate had recommended the Sovereign in such an emergency to refuse signing the commission, and, rejecting the all but unanimous oninion of the House of Commons, to turn them back on their constituents. He ( the Lord Chancellor) was surprised that any friend of the Irish church could wish its revenues exposed to the peril of a religious outcry raised by a minister against the representatives of the people, and by advising his Sovereign to refuse acceding to the all but unanimous prayer of Parliament. If he had been a friend to all the abuses of the Irish church, as he was a friend to its usefulness and perpeunty, and the. efore an enemy to those abuses, and a determined friend to their extirpation—if he was as friendly to sll such as he was hostile, he would say God forbid he should ever live to behold, or the establishment should ever see the day when so reckless, so desperate a course as a right rev. prelate recommended should be adopt ed by a minister of the crown. (Hear. ) After a few words from the Duke of CUMBERLAND and the Duke of RICHMOND, in explanation across the table, and which we could not hear, owing to the tone in which they spo .e, and the noise occasioned by the withdrawal of pee s and strangers from the house, the motion was put I and carried nernine contradicente. Adjourned at a few minutes before twelve o'clock. PLENIPOTENTIARY. — An accurate portrait of Plenipo . entiary, the winner of the Derby and Epsom, will be given in Bell's Life in London and Sporting Cironicle of Sunday, June 8. An edition of Bell's Lite in London, price sevenpence, is pub dished at tLe office, 169, Strand, early every Saturday ftergoon .n time for post, by which it may be had 100 miles from 4ond n on the Sunday. For the ,I.brary, a tie of Ben's Life in London (only 52 sheets . annually) foetus an excellent index for reference a 3 to te:: , 011 waling events. C , c '';) - 4:: 4 .. -', 7 %.. Y: ' 113/ , /(----,-.1) ) ,-;ik --, ' •-• ,f) r :,.-:si.lt. • . - : 1 - . k i , it 9 ~._-. '-'- - LONDON, SATURDAY EVENING, JUNE 7, 1834. After the furious outcry raised against Mi nisters for issuing the Irish Church Property Commission, and the talent and zeal of those opposed to it in the Lords, we certainly ex pected a very different sort of discussion from that which took place last night. There never perhaps was any question of such importance brought forward in either house, against which there was less ability displayed, and less weighty arguments adduced, than on this occasion. Speeches there were plenty, and pro phecies, and imprecations, and denuncia tions in abundance, and loud and vehe ment protestations of reverence for the church and forebodings of the evils awaiting her, but there was little reasoning, and still lest sound argument on the great principle on which the commission is issued. This argues well for the cause ; for though declamation and party zeal may raise a prejudice against any measure, that prejudice cannot last long in an intelligent age, unless founded on something like reason and justice. The Course pursued by the high church party, bespeaks the badness of their cause. Instead of meeting the arguments of the other party by facts or lo gical inductions, they meet than with mere assumptions, and with groundless assertions, the only object of which is to raise one party against another, and revive religious animosity; not for the sake of religion, but for the tem poralities of the church, the golden prebends, the rich bishoprics—in short, the mammon of unrighteousness. Because Ministers wish to reform the church, it is asserted their object is to destroy it, and when they wish to apply the surplus funds of an overgrown establish ment to useful purposes they are charged with a design to appropriate the funds of another establishment,—a Church which is strongly fixed in the affection of the people, and for the maintenance of which the revenues are not more than sufficient. Any person who considers the two questions impartially must admit that there is no similarity between them. The object of go vernment is to reform and not destroy the church, and those who charge them with insidious designs or with intentions they dare not avow, can do so only to serve political, and not religious pur poses. Earl GREY spoke out plainly on this subject, and completely dispelled the doubt which the withdrawal of the 147th clause of the Irish Tithe 'Bill last year had raised in the public mind. He disclaimed any intention to sanction the principle of spoliation ; he wished merely to effect a new appropriation of the reve nues of an establishment so enormously dispro portioned to its wants,and with great emphasis and truth added, "I trust that your lordships will not be led away by general declamation about the destruction of the church, but that you will consider seriously and calmly whether it is pos sible that the church of Ireland can be main tained in the state in which it stands at the pre sent moment, and whether it is not only the part of true wisdom, but the bounden duty of Parliament, acting on sound, statesmanlike views and principles, to adopt measures which will prove salutary to , the church itself." The LORD CHANCELLOR denied all intention on the part of the Government of appropriating any of the surplus funds for the payment of the Catholic clergy, chiefly on the ground that they never would sanction any measure which would make the Catholic religion the esta blished religion of Ireland. These two points, in our humble opinion, are totally d fferent. If it follows that the simple circumstance of pay ing the clergy of any religion makes that the established religion, then Presbyterianism is the State religion of the, north cf Ireland as much as Protestailti*SM. We have all along contended for such an appropr:ation of the sur plus, not for the purpose of encouraging Ca tholicism, but because we are convinced it would have a contrary effect; and, above all, because it is the only rational plan for peace to Ireland. Even the tottl , e of RlCri- MOND, with all his high regard for the Pro- testant Church, with great good sense, declared that he was one of those who tho'tkeit that the Catholic ministers ought to be paid by the State ; and to this " complexion" it must come At tast. In the House of Commons, last night, the committee on the Poor Laws' Amendment proceeded as far as the 82a clause, when the chairman reported progress. We hope th a t, by the assistance of the two days' morning sit tings, it will pass the House next week. We are happy to learn, that the LORD CHANCELLOR, in his examination before the Committee of the House of Commons on the Law of Libel, on Wednesday and Thursday, expressed himself decidedly favourable to the repeal of the stamps on newspa pers. His Lordship was of opinion, that the pains and penalties attached to this law were of no service in preserving the purity of the press, and that the best mode of counteracting the effect of . the blasphemous, obscene, and otherwise detestable publications, which we have seen in times of excitem en t was, to have recourse to the ordinary principle in all such cases of taking away the impediments from the fair dealer, and thus removin g the advantage which the law now gives to dis honest competition. The fair dealer is now liable to a stamp of fourpence, which the unfair dealer escapes, and the latter not only highly seasons the food he prepares for the perverted taste of the people, but he has the ad ditional advantage of underselling the former by about 300 per cent. His Lordship well ob served that by removing the stamps you apply the common principle of destroying the smuggler by lowering the duties. He pointed out with his usual eloquence that the effectual cure of the evils so loudly complained of was to provide more wholesome food for the reading portion of the people ; and where this had been done it had been attended with the most complete suc cess. If the two means were adopted to gether, of increasing the number and variety of innocent and useful publications, that is, taking off the tax which prevents competition and providing more good cheap papers for the bulk of the community, his Lordship had no doubt that the public would no longer have any reason to fear even the worst kinds of libel. Papers might be sold so cheap, as to be brought within the reach of the lowest classes of society. His Lordship continued to say, « It is no more than just that the people should be informed on all public affair% in which they take an interest ; they are not less nearly concerned in them than their richer neighbours, and a sound system of government requires the people to read and inform them selves upon political subjects, else they are the prey of every impostor and every agitator that practices his trade in the country. If they do not read,—if they do not learn, if they do not digest; by discussion and reflec tion, What they have read and learnt ; if they do not thus qualify themselves to form opinions for themselves, other men will form opinions for them, not according to truth and to the interests of the people, but according to their individual and selfish interests, Which may, and most proba bly will, be contrary to those of the community." The repeal of the duty, and the consequent lar, D e reduction of the price of newspapers would, he had no doubt, be itrimediately followed by the greatest possible improvement in the tone and temper of the political information of the people, and he was satisfied, from very long and anxious consideration; that the danger is riot Of the people learning too much, but knowing too little. These are the views of a true statesman. Mr. YOUNG is wrong in his premises in so fat as they relate to shipping. In 1820, the tonnag . e of British ships that cleared outwards was 1,549,598 ; in 1825 it was 1,711,16 9 ; in 1830 it was 2,102,147 ; in 1833 it was 2,244,274. The increase of tonnage of foreigii shipping that cleared outwards has no doubt also increased. In 1820 it was 433,328 ; in 1825 it was 851,354; in 1830 it was 758,368 ; in 1833 it was 758,601. But is it really a ground of complaint that our neighbours have prospered as well as ourselves ; and has Mr. YOUNG, as a mercantile man, yet to learn, that the more our neighbours prosper; the nlore they will be enabled to purchase of us ? and is not this manifest from the increase of our foreign trade, with respect to which Mr. YOUNG also is in error? In 1820, the amount of British and Irish produce and manufactures exported was, in official value, 37,820, 9 931. In 1825 it was 46,453,0221. In 1833 it was 69,989,3391. About these things there can be no dispute. They appear from the finance accounts, and they evince beyond .the possi bility of question the continuing increase of the shipping, and of the foreign trade of the United Kingdom. But in one respect Mr. YOUNG is right. The shipping interest, at least in the port of London, is distressed ; but distress also prevails, and continues to increase, in almost every branch of home industry, and particularly in agri cultural industry. We have again and again pressed upon our readers the consideration how it happens that our foreign trade prospers while our home industry languishes. Mr. YOUNG is right in another respect. All our duties of customs are excessive. This is manifest from the great fall that has taken place in general prices, which may be esti mated from the great diminution in the de clared value of our exports. These in 1810 wire in declared value 47,000,9261., the official value of whieli was 83,299,408/. In 1820 the declared value was 35,569,0771., and the official value was 37,820,2931., but in 1833 the declared value was only 39,667,3471. ) while the official "value was 69,989,339/, About these things iltere can be as little dispute. They all appear in the . . finance accounts. Now, even if our dUties of ithports were Moderate in 1810 ? they must be excessive now, because the tiChangeable value Of the articles Upon which they are charged has fallen at least one half, and our duties of cus toms, if we do not mean that they should ope rate as a bar to importation, should be dimi nished. But to make them operate us a bar to importation, is tb impose a restraint upon home industry, because, for every foreign article imported, some article of home industry must be exported. Thus, though we do not agree with Mr. Y - Ou that our shipping or mit foreign trade have diminished, yet we agree with him that they are in danger of being injured if our duties of customs shall not be revised, and the duty that is to be levied be made to correspond to the exchangeable value of the article imported. We_ also agree with him, that though the ex c2ssiveness of our import duties have not pre vented the increase of our foreign trade, yet our foreign trade would have increased much more if it had not been for that excessiveness. The Paris Papers of Thursday contain no further news than that there had been some partial rioting at Toulouse, which had been put down by the authorities. Marshal BOOR.. MONT was said to be on his return to France. FRENCH . FUNDS Juss 5 Five ner 105 f. 9oc. 8 c 90c. Four and a Half per Cents., Mt 15c. For er Cents., 94f. —c. Three per Cent,. 7.if 45c 50c. 10c. Bank Actions, 1 , R20f. 1.515 f. Rente de Naples, 95f. 95f sc. 95f. Boman Five per Cents., 9 :A, Rente •'i , ,pagne, Five per Cents , 33 1 4 112. Rente d'Espagne, Three per Cents., 4.)%55 7 %. Roy !MI luau, 54% 1 4. Rente Pprnet. Eina, tie rive per Cents:, 7411%54 Belgian Loan, 1831, Five per Cent, 99 1 4. Hay tian Loan, 2 , 6 f. EXFDANGE ON LONDON. One month. paper, 25f 3/ 1 / 42 c.; money, —f. —c. "Ihr se months, pa I. 2104. c. ; money, —f. —fours duthentique. Frankfort Papers say there is a report preva lent that the King of the FRENCH, in conse quence of the unsettled state of Europe, has expressed a wish to summon a general congress, and to that end has made overtures to several of the Continental Sovereigns. The absurdity of this rumour is so apparent, considering the nature of Louis PHILIP'S connection with England. that it requires no refutation. The Allgemeine Zeitung mentions that a Proclamation has been issued by Lord Nu- GENT, dissolving the Parliament of the lonian Islands, and indulges in a long tirade of abuse against the government of his Lordship, which it asserts has had the effect of throwing the lonian Islands into confusion. VIENNA, MAy 27.—Five per Cent. Metalliques, 99 9-16 ; Four per Cent., 91 3-16 ; Bank Shares, 1,236. —Allyemeine Zeituny, June 1. The following is a copy of a letter received this morning, June 1, by the Secretary at Lloyd's t— " Foreign-office, June 6. " Sir—f am directed by Viscount Palmerston to at: quaint you, for the information of the committee for ma nging the affairs of Lloyd's, that intelligence has been re ceived at this department, that the Regency acting in Por tugal, in the name and on the behalf of Her Most Faithful M tjesty Donna Maria 11., his resolved to establish imme (Lately an effective blockade of the Island of Madeira and Porto Santo: " I am yours, icc. , &c., " G. SHEE. " To the Secretary of Lloyd's." By the New York Papers; which have been re6eived to the 14th ult., it appears that the Senate has at length come to a decision to re ject the PRESIDENT'S protest, and has passed a resolution to the effect that he had no right to issue such a document : (From the New York Commercial Advertiser, May 9. ) GREAT DIVIDEND.-The Phoenix Bank of ts7is day declared a dividend of 25 per cent., to be paid on the 12th of Jdtle out of i 6 §urphis capital and 3 per cent. on the last six months' profits, in all 23.4 per cerit. The itnit tution has given notice that on the 22d inst. books will be opened for subscription to 40,000 shares, at2s dollars each, additional stock, subject to an assessment of 25, 50, or 100 dollars, and agreeably to the act increasing the capital a million and a half. SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC joUiNALS. The reported speech of his Majesty to the Bishops on the Birthday is so eagerly quoted by the Conservative party, that it becomes necessary to make one or two re ma ks,Opon it. That speech, as given in a contemporary : journal, eiipiesies the Khig'a personal determination to preserve the integrity and interests of the church (being the church of Ireland, as well as of England) inviolate ; and discloses his Majesty's doubts whether, in any respect, even in that of minor points of discipline, the establishment calls for any species of correction. The speech was uttered at a time when the temporal Government of the realm was in the Orions of man, of its responsible .ministers actually under the process of dissolution, and when it had become of infinite importance to ascertain on what principles and in what spirit the King's Cabinet was to be rebuilt. His Majesty asserts in that declaratory speech that he was not answerable for its language to any earthly tri bunal.. Now. coupling this opinion of a British Sovereign with the occasion on Which he delivered it, with the events of the day, and with the consequence§ of *hid' it might be productive, there is no denying that, if genuine, which we at first doubt ;ft, but which, unfortunately, we have since found too much reason to believe, that step adopted by his Maje Sty Ought td be regarded as one of grave irn , portance. A King of England can do no political act for which some min:ster oullit not to be held responsible. I Was the speech in question a political act? Where no man living doubts the rectitude and good intentions of the King, there is no use in speaking hotly or impetuously on such a matter; or at worst, in treating the thing o therwise than as a precedent which might, if overlooked, lead possibly to future evil. The discourse was delivered to a great ecclesiastical body, recognised as such by the na tion—the prelates of the united church of England and Ireland, assembled in the royal presence on a public occa sion--and the Sovereign who spoke it, announced that it expressed the feelings and resolutions of his inmost mind, upon a question of the very highest practical importance to the country. Considering it, therefore, in the most mode rate and sober light, we cannot hold such a declaration to be any other than official—than an act deliberately per formed by the " head of the established church," not merely indicative of his wishes, but morally binding upon his future conduct, in his character both executive and legislative. The political importance of such a proceeding none can for a moment question, who has observed the use already made of it by that party which arrogates to itself the protectorship of the church, and by M 7. Stanley, who hung upon it his assump tion that the King by whom it was adopted would never sanction the acknowledged policy of his own sworn Minis ters. Under these circumstances, is it too much to ask, whether some one of those Ministers—he, for instance, who is the ostensible head of the Government—ought not to avow or disavow that speech ?---whether he ought not to put the country on its guard, and prepare the people of England for what is before them, by stating in the face of Parliament, that the King's declaration to the Bishops has his (Lord Grey's) entire sanction, and that it fully coincides with the views and policy of the existing a dministration, or tranquillize the public uneasiness by pronouncing it to be an extra official and private ebul lition of his Majesty, neither pledging him in his legislative capacity, nor cognizable by any constituted power ? It would be too much if the political nature of the declaration were admitted, in the same breath in which all responsibility for such an act, in every quarter, was denied ; for we should then be neither more nor less than living under an uncontrolled pattet, Oristitlt countable to Parliament, or people: it appears to us, that if ministers do not And it hedotiiiit t 6 itotiee. the klllii4ect themselves, Wne iiidetiendent tit feipeeta.hie triemher of either hoiise Of Parliament itight Bret propriety-put d:gti 'soon With regard 'to and d'ras . v forth a reßly 4 'tVhii;h be.iatiaed: never be forgot, that th e . sou nd and ,alt'itait doctrine, that the King can do nu.Vn'ong, founded do the principle that his Ma ieity, Acting solely by the medium of known constitutional advisers, is not responsible for their advice, nor for the acts done in pursuance of that advice.— Times. It is evident from what passed in the House of Lords, last night, and from the tone and temper of the house, as well as from the sentiments expressed, that the Ainisters will have a hard struggle for existence. There was a de gree of passion, as well as of personal asper.ty, in the dis cussions of last night, which seldoni ruffles the decorum of theit )drcilhip!i' Proceedings, and Which shows how strongly this glinrch question is likely to be contested in that branch Of the legislature, where Ministers are confessedly the weakest. The motion, which was a mere matter of form, afforded no opportunity for a trial of strength. It was a motion that could not be refused. But if there be any force in words, the day, cannot be far distant when a motion hot merely of form but of substance will put the fate of the question and of the ministry at issue together. There can be no doubt as to the course which ministers mean to pursue with regard to the church of Ireland. But there is some doubt as to the course which the two Houses of Parliament will pursue on the same question. Whether the Commons will sanction such an interference with pro perty, and if they do, whether the Lords will again incur the risk of another collision, we do not pretend, in the present unsettled state of parties, to foresee. But it is plain enough that matters are hastening to a crisis which will cal for the best exercise of the best understand ngs in the country to moull and fashion into good.—Morning Herald. COURT OF CHANCERY.-(THIS )AY.) SHIRLEY V. LORD FERRERS. Sir W. HORNE stated that he - was instructed to draw his Lordship's attention to this case, with a view of ob taining judgment. The Loan CHANCELLOR said he had intended to give judgment in it to-day, but having been detained in another place until half-past twelve o'clock, instead of getting home at eight as he had anticipated, he had been obliged to de lay judgment till next week. SMITH V. DR. TARTET. Mr. KOE applied on behalf of the defendant in this case, that two affidavits might be mentioned in the order, so that the defendant might have the costs of these affida vits. His Lordship had made an order on the petition giving the defendant the costs, and the registrar in draw ing it up had omitted to introduce these two affidavits.— Ordered. wa ß s o a W b E ou ß t V t ..l , m lo a ß ke ßl: n . Mr. RUSS ELL application in this case respecting a part of the decree which had been made in the cause, stating that his Lordship had, on a former oc casion, expressed a strong opinion against the correctness of the decree, when The Loan CHANCELLOR interrupted him by stating that he had had experience enough in this case to teach him not to say a word upon it without looking into the whole of the papers and hearing what the opposite side might have to say. The learned counsel would therefore have to postpone his application. IN RE FRANK, A LUNATIC. Sir W. Ho aNE stated that this was the petition of a professional gentleman named Leigh, and the question for the court to decide was, whether, under the peculiar circumstances of the case, that gentleman was entitled to interest upon his bill of Costs. He did not pretend to argue, as a general proposition of law, that a solicitor's bill of costs would carry interest, but the present case had originated in the year 1825. As to the large out lays which had been made by the petitioner there could be no question. The amount of the bill was between 2,000/. and 3,000/., and notwithstanding all the scrutiny that had taken place in the Masters' Office upon taxa tion, there had not been more than 2001. take'i off. The fund paid into court had been a productive fund, for it had created dividends, and Mr. Leigh had been appointed by the court to watch and protect the property and person of the lunatic. The court, therefore, having appointed him to watch the proceedings and to lay the foundation of a commission under which alone the court was to administer the whole funds of the lunatic for the benefit of every body concerned, ought to feel no difficulty in granting the prayer of the petition. Mr. SPENCE followed on the same side. The LORD CHANCELLOR stated that he felt some dif ficulty in allowing the petitioner to receive interest, be cause he at present thought that the observations which had been made in support of the petition might apply to almost every case of lunacy lie would inquire into it, and if the result of those inquiries changed his mind, he would hear what Mr. Wakefield, who was on the other side,_ had to say in opposition to it. His Lordship then proceeded to hear further arguments in the part-heard appeal of " Wain v. Rice." VICE-CHANCERY COURT—(THIS DAY). His HONOUR the Vice• Chancellor having disposed of all the causes in which Sir Edward Sugden was not en gaged, rose at a quarter before eleven o'clock. No case ilossessbi the loan ptiblic interest, COURT OF KING'S BENCH-(THIS DAYS) THE ICING L•. THE OUSE BANK COMMISSIONERS. In this ease a rule had been obtained by Mr. Sergeant ME nEwETti E It, calling ilion the defendants to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue ; commanding them to proceed forthwith to put the banks of the river Ouse into a state of proper security and repaii. It ap- Oared that in the year 1831, an Act of Parliament had been obtained, Sr the purpose of deepening and straighten ing the channel of the Ouse; In consequence of the al teration thus made in the channel of the river, the tide rose and fell with much more rapidity, and the banks tier► considerably damaged. One of the proprietors holding land brought an action against the eau brink commissioners, end damages were awarded him ; the consequence was that ail arrangement was entered into, and an Act of Par liament obtained in I:Wen - Ater,. 1832, by which a certain sum was to be vested in the Ouse Bank Commissioners, for the purpose of repairing any damage done, or that might hereafter be done, to the land of the proprietors oil the banks of the river. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL now appeared to show cause against the rule: The terms of the act were that the Commissioners should "front time to time" make such re pairs as may be required, whereas the mandamus required m trt t Thh h e hgee e eyubi ireae t ei o dripkes do so t6n:ddt ehkde ' e r'eteftoewr gentlemantt would i ne w t lt d i tb t r h heabe . ne ' nsk ' us rinne T o f inehe orffruepe rpetual ootd fhocommissionersrel affidavits ffivartetdup araoleir .n w i to had been filed, showing that ter} extensive repairs hradseeerawpenuband i pa e iirl e ocss n hn:t made by the commissioners, and that others were in pro gress. Under these circumstances, he contended that the rule should be discharged. Sir JAMES SCA R LETT and Mr. KELLY followed on the same side. Alf. Sergeant MEREwETHEE and Mr. AnonEws were iietrtt in support of the rule. The Cum , ' JusTic E said that it appeared to the Court, after an attentive conSideilltiod of the arguments and affidavits, that the prima facie case of ne g lect on the p art of the C omm issioners remained unanswered, with the omission of the word " forthwith," which did not appear essential to the rule. Rule absolute. THE FUNDS•--(THIS DAY.) CITY, TWELVE O'CLOCK. Montreal and Halifax papers have been received to the 9th and 16th May, and Bahama to the 15th April, but their contents possess no particular interest. THE FUNDS. Consols, which left off yesterday at 92 3 / for the ac count, remain steady at the above quotation at present, owing to the French Funds coming lower from Paris 79f. 10c. Spanish and Portuguese Stocks, the former coming I per Cent. h l ier, from Paris, 32 3 / 4 , may be quoted at p resen t 43% , the latter 76% 3 4. We hare no fresh arri va l s f rom Portugal as yet, or any political news worth communicating. HALF-PAST ONE. With the exception of a trifling fluctuation, the funds have continued steady during the morning. Consols, which were in the early part of the day_ at 92% for the Account, have since receded to 9 2 % 3 4,; may be quoted at present at their former price, 92: 1 / 4 As , with little doing. thea and d is :is 433 7 a n . hs . h Stock Portuguese ha is n done osnee good 0 d 44 as lA i n ; p re vious i i t is part of the day, when it was 76% 3 / 4 : at present 76% N. THREE O'CLOCK. andlinios t s e ta o t m ed e that Don nDgolnand3.liguNeel freshwill p a r r o ri c v e a e l d s. to Leghorn, Consols for the Account, 921 CAMBRIDGE ELECTION.—The nomination', will take place on Tuesday next ; the polling will commence on the following day ; and on Friday the return will be formally announced. The contest is ex pected to be an exceedingly sharp one. We most sincerely regret to learn, that Mr. John Galt, to whom the public, in common with ourc,-.. selves, stand indebted for so many pleasant hfuvrasra_` amusement, is now lying in the last stag this lysis. It is his intention to set out for Sco I evening. pleasant ind SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE (THIS DSV) tyltr,st 1,t)V1)..) Jozit N.E., thnderate.—Arrived the Vestal, Robertgon, frond Oporto; Ruth, Hore, and Anna. Bengal MerehHrit; fromrikqi6 l ?, frotti Powell, front Jamaica f, Darkly, Mann; from Grenada; Mhdres, and sailed for the river. Sail.:d the outward-bottn(l. Cowls, JUNE 6.—Arrived the Henry Thompson, Par. son, from Boston. PORTSMOUTH, JUNE 6.—Wind E.N.E. to S.S.W.— Arrived off port the Elizabeth, Antolry, from :Sydney 4 Maria Cecilia, from the River Gambia • and Philadelphia , Morgan, from London, which sailed for New the Hope transport, Walters, for Plymouth. l PLYMOUTH, JUNE s.—Wind NV. to N.—Arriv Day,. Betsey Hall, Croker, from Lima; and William od Meltraisb, from Gibraltar: Off port a Mitch ship, No. 3; I and his Majesty's ship Nautilus, from Falmouth. Sailed his Majesty's ship Castor, for Portsmouth. • ee FALMOUTH, JUNE s.—Wind W. to N., strong breezes and squally.—Arrived the Maria, Kemp, from Si 1r York. Sailed Leone ; and Louisa, Port, from New Orleans. S ail the C43lumbia Steam-packet, for the Mediterianein: STANGATE CREEK; 6.—Arrived the Challenger' Alexander, and Providentta, Nichols, from Smyrna' Gib- BRISTOL JUNE 6.—Arrived the A z o res packet, son, from Lisbon, and the Hernby, Allen, from Jamai ca i ,•, LIVERPOOL, JUNE s.—Arrived the M ar ia, G°"„; ; ' from M on t e Vid eo ; L y di a, Gibb , and Retrench, bell, from Jamaica ; St. George, Thompson, from IV k York ; Apollo, Thompson ; Famenend, Glendden • 11 „,„" k . . ingham, Ki nna i r d ; George, Grogier, and HazarAi l ,,'"" n son, from the H avanna h . O ff port, the Celia, Da W r' ..- • from New Orleans. I GREENOCK, JUNE 4.—Arrived the Glenaffer. Don °P' from Trinidad, and the Horace, Foss, from New Orleans' CoRK, JUNE 4.—Arrived the Thomas Hanford, f r° ,„ nl St. John's, New B runsw i c k , an d t h e F ox, C o oke, Teneriffe. The Councturen Zeplin, from Huligurhaven to sza Petersburg, is on ;bore near Warnemmide. Crew In part of the cargo saved. The Effort, Collie, bound to Riga, put into Carlscrons leaky, having struck a sunken rock. . OAV uNF. ()CLOCK. PRICES OF STOCKS Tit, /lank S'ork ?IR 3 per Cent. }led ' 91Vi 3 per Cent. Cone. " shl.t Ib per cent. - D itto Reif 98 3 4 7 , % New 3t4 per Cent shut 3 per Cent. Ann I -16._ - 1 per Cen , . Is•Yi A.sent., - Ditto Di.senteo.„ Bank Long Ann. to ex pirg Jan. 5, 15A0...17 1 A3.ij !_1(; Det.lo, I gsn • • 1 I_l6 Jan. 5, ..... shut Jr . t. 5, Ns( ) Aprils. Jan. 5, 'B7O v`e'w 5 Iv- Cent. — India StocA Ditto Bonds 30: Rpm. South Sea Stock .... )1d Annuities . ......... New Ditto . • -• "."......:- 1 per Cent AO 175 r " — Ex 131 its, t r,r , 'r 5: 5 , 2 pm. I)itfO.:. `• 00 '-', 1 52 pm • Ditto Small Ditto C-mmercial... ...... pm. Ditto Advertised Rank for Account — India for Ace tint ... Cons. for Account 92%% PRICES OP FOREIGN FUNDS THIS DAT AT ONE O'CL(ick .I.istrtain Bonds .. ...... MO N • Peruvian moods •s• .. "1 E? 'I lqian Bond: ucb Ditto AccOunt • v......210( i Ditto Account 3 +8 1 ,4 Portuguese Brinds Br:alliaii ;A nn & 75 , 4 , Ditto Account 74 5 4 5 , itto Aernunt nenos Ayres it0ud5......-.324 2 Ditto Acronnt...76q% 1 6 1 4, I)itto Account 32 Prussian Bonds 10 3 14 :3 hilian Bonds .... .. ...... ...29k; : . Ditto Bonds, IS9I to 3 Ditto Aerount 3l Russian Hoods, 1822 , 11% ..:..: t.... olumbi.m Bonds Ditto Account.. 24 I)itto 111. -. v • tossi Ditto Bonds, N 24 )5i ,Spanish Bonds, -• -.43104 +4 Dtto Ace-utit gs“ , ,, Ilitt,• Ace 4354 4 314 t, amish Bel ds ..,.. . Ditto Acc4 um.. 75 Ditto Account - - -- ;36 i, L-eek Hands...—. — French liente , , hp. c. —t — 4 .. Ditto POTWS, .8:2% 33! Exchange.... --1 --e. Ditto Accottn't — ,--- 3 percent...... S 1•• _r•,q, 'Limn Ronda, N per cent 3434 ,-- Exchange 25f 411 Ditto Amount — Dutch, 2i p. c. 5!2 3 i 74 ni to, 1 per cent 45 Ditto Accottro.. .. . 54% 'ntt.• Account •15434 5 Ditto, 5p c •,.. " 7 14% ',Tr ‘• oli•an .. ... .... 91% Ditto ACCOnn/ (aMi% PRICES OF SHAKES THIS OAT At ONE O'CLOCK. P,,ii... I.i , s , • , r Alton Mining Company . £9 12M - 12 fag! , Ile, .111. ~ •NS , ai..pin. .E10(1 9 colanos %Timm: ennimAri, EISO 127(4 :razoltan \lining CninttattY • irazthatt ntp. II tit. C.. ,m.. at "ti. p.n.. .C2i , 08 32:;6 )iti , Mtittktibas l'ocaes 2O 20 1 4 flirt. :sit. . 1 / I ',.r. Dpi liev L 7 ata rf.ratioa Mining Company ..w.*;,,,, lion Nlitimi. i .iintintiv "funii:un N1i....,, Co. (iss. at 5/.. on.) 5`..t14 JO, v.tiglish Nn...int Company ....... . .. . . . ,neral llivrifit , Asimela.linn - 'itherniati Niining Co. 1: 10 1,3 c woo ?dining Co. real dei Ni.ote k lillilMl. , ...(unriag-) - U oriat te.., %Fin , . (is , at 21. ,an. -at :Into New Set iii.. liiiinee Fire I ni , nraticeConip. ...... 0 rotent.ir l insurance romp lostraltan Co. -.nada ronivinv IS iicrai Stean. Navigation CO lational Provincial Bank or England 17i tin Doce • 'nom , /tank .25 11li ft 9(1 COURSE OF EX, If NGE YESTERDAY. kmsterdam C.r 12 51 1..4h0rn ... . 434 11 tto, at sight 'n 3i Genoa • , 5 75 Rotterdam 2 U 12 4 Milan 31 katwerp 12 5 ' Venice 47 Ii imbtirg M. 11.13 121 gapes litona l3 12i, Palm mo .....heroz. 122 Paris, 3 days' sight 1.5 So 1 Asian .... '. , 2 3itto .) U 25 SO , deer'., 2;4 siordeaux 2\ 85 7... c, lanetro itertin Frank fort on Maine, Ex. '..i 1 .59 i 9,,eno s A vym, — ..tershurgli, ruble.:, os 10 4 I imisin, ii days' sight l;4 Vienna, efreetr;e fi, 2 M. 1,, pi ('ork --s te —...•10............. 10 1 auLLioN, PER 07. 14 1, 64 .C. s. d. , 371.4 Portugal Gold, coin... 0 0 0 _36 Foreign Gold, in bars 317 1) 10 New Gouli.oons '3 18 6 30 , , :ew 1) liars 47 L.Silverhars,stantlau I 'J 0 0 Tadrt f ',.01 it [intros . sarceitlna ;:braitar.... HIGH WATIZR AT I.nNIDON BotlnaF. Tn Morning 49 minutes after 2 Evening 10 minutes after 3 POLICE INTELLIGENCE. HALL Mr. Vincent, the father UNlON- of Miss Vincent, the etr e "' is attended at this office for the pu r pose of soliciting the Ma' gistrate's advice under the following circumstances :--- daugereY hter Mr. Vincent stated, that some time ago h entered into an engagement to perform at the Se Theatre, lie being responsible to Mr. Osbaldiston for the due performance of the contract. In the course of some time afterwards he (Mr. Vincent) had reason to suspect that a more close intimacy subsisted between his daughter and Mr. Osbaldiston than was proper, and he had a com munication with him upon the subject. On that occasion Mr. Osbaldiston observed that the rumours then in circu lation respecti ng hi mse lf and Miss Vince nt were withoutM the slighte s t f oun d a ti o n ; and this assurance satisfied r. Vincent's mind that there was no truth in the calumnious and did reports. At l eng th Mi s s Vincent's name appeared in th e she bills a tobs absented t a ed yahperrisneclifpfarlo from characterhom e, di in a ndev not makeece, and her ar the day pr ev i ous ly to that on which she was to have appea red pearance at the theatre. The applicant wrote to Nr . Osbaldiston, as he was of opinion that he was awar e of her elopement, and received a reply f'' °3l that gentleman, admitting that he knew where she wa'' and pledging himself that she was t perfectly sa fe, and tha t she had sustained no injury at his hands, ' a lthough repor had ascribed very different conduct to him. Mr. Vincent wrote another letter to Mr. Osbaldiston, requesting to be informed where his daughter was, and received an answier to it from the staev-manager, who mentioned th at be eras requested by Mr. ' Osbaldiston to state that any letters ad' that he must decline giving any information dressed to Miss Vincent should be forwarded to her, lace of her abode. Since the communication alluded t had taken place, Miss Vincent returned home, and played on e night at the Surrey Theatre, but had abandoned it sine, taking the whole of her wardrobe with her; and although frequent applications had been made to 3lr. Osbaldiston: who was aware of the place of her retreat, be r efuse: Se to give any information on the subject. Mr. Vincent d scribed the state of anxiety of mind under which he aa4 his wife laboured since the elopement of his daughter. _ Mr. Mt/ GRAY regretted that he could nut render the applicant any assistance. as to theopl THE MARKETS-(THIS DAY) COVENT-GAM/EN MARKET. t o the There was a gre t supply at th s morning's market. 31 . oe hale With the nest articles was brisk, but otherwise r.UII, at following pi ices : . d. s. d. ad. a.d - ( i g P..tat es (cwt.) 36to 5 Spinach :half sieve) 0 6 t`': • Ca :).1,f,, White I , ) Iti 3 . . a,b.ige Lett - tt . 4 A 2 es . - - 0 C a '2 0 3 tirevn Pease 9 ""6 Rhubarb ((i 1 0 Broad Beans: l'o 1 a It.o•01l 0 6 "r 0 Cion , ••berries Fndwc I 0 . 0 Apples 4 0 Iv rl rye adish(huod,e) 3 0 50, Onions 2 0 3 Cf 'I ery ..f!: Carrots 12h,oches)... 4 0 8 Sweet Oranges 5 0 f" a' 1' rn p C ~s , , 0-t. or (*r , eos... 1 6 2ii )Vahluts Y •ung Onions ... 1 0 2 0 Asparagus 1 3 ' 6 'ramp Raddishes 0 9 1 6 Raddishes Cl-2 hairds) on go •..k i 0 6 1 . span. Chesnut& dreck) 4 6 5 6 , P , r. nrap-... (por W 0 8 2 I wrench ditto ......... ... :1 0 t . i , E dish, Forced. 26 5 0 French Walnuts ....... -t 0 ,! r , Pt• Apples (Ih.) - o .0,5 , , aVenuts ...1 q(2 ',.; C eyrie- ..... . Stm I<ail ',punnet) Fren.-11 Be its .... Coarse hears Lowland Small S a llad (b . t . a . ce .... , i l: 2 6 0 .. (.1 4 )) t ;_l s re , s al o i w . n e , , t .e t r i. e i r ec ec s s, ( i( p p i. s . - ). r 4. 4. s .i c e. are` i...., 1. j, l . ‘0, ,„ , i 60 - pi to d ....t.. t*. .5...: Cu•stIIESLAN I) . dew , eadfiw ••,..0 .................. .•. .................. 4 0 4 ,5 U4ful Old 4150 .......• ..- ......... .... i." 7. . ". .:: 415 5 0 ii y e_grass , a) ...... • , 5 5 0 Fi , i Uplan , Nleaiinw and Unser flay ................... ~t w -t . „2 1 4 £1 Bto £1 10 1 Wheat ta ... i t CC U OI 4 Peaches 1 : 8 i t :e l Ir t b eeaHh ) awe l d i(ral'()7 l l > yn i t ni r .m o es4 . lt4w . )y .... t ti..a .... :n 1 "I 'll . 01. . "8" ... 1 . 11 .. " ..... 1-. . di: .. ‘1r .. °- . " 7 7. 1.'- . 11 . 1 !. y. ... L .. i. 4...D..:4".....y."..............:7...... - -0 1 . : 1 ) 0 ) 4 4" 1 ! fn A i .C 3 15 Meadow gat ............... .ER 5 to ..cO3lOO 4 15 t .ne ...pland Meadow am! ttye.grass ..... •••• 4, 0 1 14 Clover Hay (extra fine). ..P5 0 .G ene rally .... ~., sat Straw ....C1 10 t , .l 121 Wheat straw.... f f-4 C N o e a w rs l t i lead ow ow Ha H y a . ... .......................................................... ...... ~D...................... .i 3 g 1 g , 9, 0 • 4 4 3 CY q 4 itv Useful Old Ditto ............... . ..... ......•••"'''' 4 10 i 1 5 Fine Upland Meadow .... ttye .. ..... .... Hay ......... . 0 ! 13 Clever Hay ...... . ........................................... ; 10 Oat Straw .£ 18to X I 101 Wheat StraW••• PRICE OF SUGA R. ted Jane, The Average Price of Brown or Muscovado Sugar, yo f from tIP:3-I,he Returns s Os. aid. per Hundred Weig made in Übe week ending the' r vt . of the uties of Customs paid or payable thereonhtli 't},e thereof :nto great Britain e-1 ----------7:-E --Alne 6. F . d. C /AL MARK—I. I . , ron Bensham Main ---- 16 dii Walls End K e i r li k it t ' t g is.. t •••••• i l a ; 1 vorth .‘. Per Toi. Eat ~rey —.----. 14 6 Walls l' ,ll ‘. Ei 'I. wen Or 'a 1t,..m~1, 1 Pontnn Wind50r. ......... 16 6 Walls End .4 101.4 ~......, 1 ; .r.- Ilartlev.----.—. 16 11 al. ' 11 wwaall ,; E r ii ; : f li tt ii . , , v ,w ic n k , itC ., :. 1 7 3 0 3 W a lLs End Ad,e,..1 W Its En •1 , s.r and C... 1 1 11 1: N%We'avl:kEsE:a:lnieet.lt!°:....''''''''''.7'.. 11 j 14 6 'O9 Wa Is End 1-1.1tt0n—.......... 17 9 Walls End E1giii........""' Walls End Hilda —...—.. 16 9 Ships arrived since t..........ide........ los : last market-dav, 15. DEVIZES CORN MARKET —June o' g• Per Sam s. d s. d. Per Quarer. °• .4 oto !: 3 i 0 Best Wheat 26 oto 1/ 0 Barley. ............ , 0 0 al 0 Second 23 0 0 rats ......... .••• 1 7 0 0 'birds 2O P 21 Beans (per r sack/ . 0 sy ‘ 0 LIB Sacks of Wheat.oldl, o • lour Per R " • ti,. v..rngn •vf Wheaßtl,lt62%l--------------11bNG...H.....t..M....t..t.:.1.t.N.....1!1..A. .n..K..EL J un e 5.,4d. a s , ../1 tO,. 0 Do. Grinding, 4 'lb. ........................... 1; i 3 g Oats, 391 b ........................................ ..? , . / 7 0 Barley,. , mperial quarter .................... .30_ 2 J - 3 , 6 OA Beans, tilqi lb .......................... .: f a , is 0 New dttt , ) ....... . ............................ 22 0 22 6 New White Boil og ........ in: ... .......... 18 6 20 0 Ditto Grey ditto ... BIRTH . . t of a son. Claramont-house, Cheslitu2 at Willesden, Middlesex, ----- MARRIED. 13rook-green, Hammersmith On the sth inst., On the sth inst., the lady of Charles Johnston, Esq. , 49( Esq.. formerly o f f W'llesden lodg ' hter of tho Letitia Sergeant, o i -e, only daug late John Sergeant, Esq., of Doctors'-common s. i Sharpe, On The 4th i nst., at St. Pancras, Mr. Lancel ot Ta lor, to Mary Ann, eldest daughter of the late John ) Esq. , of Ross, timber-merchant. re p Ma, On the 29th March, at Rio Janeiro, Augu sta. ' J o r "ag e uis n to eldest daughter of John Henry Freese, EA" Antonio Pinheiro, Esq. goodlane, On the 26th ult., at St. Margaret Pat‘oteri'lo Rosalin, Robert Glenn, Esq., of Christ's 1-I °V i ' — ' daughter of S. Wesley Es , rh rch, Lambeth, the On the sth inst., at , St. 4 John's ' - ' -u ' 5 ill, Norwich, Rev. Thomas Cooper Colh, f Clement o , geory Lewis, Esq.. to Hannah, eldest daughter f ' awes 0 Edgard of Wellington -terrace, Lambeth. AA , Fields, On the sth inst., at St. Giles's-hl-u' in-the . Great Tribe, Esq., of Lincoln's Inn-fields, an late Ch flee hter of the street, to Isabella, youngest dautedford-squars:______/-• Stable, Esq., of Bedford- street, D lED. r t .l, • her titith year, Rebecca flar,:. ° e ( t, On the 3d inst., . I "Esq of Southampton' se iniam Forrest, ~ wife of W Camberwell.. • e a }r'• ad inst., in German-place, Brighton, ag On the , , Richard N ever., formerly of Islington. Mr' Mfr.On the 4th inst., at the house of her daughter, are, Plummer, in Bernard street, Russell-square , 313 „fi g tO• the widow of the late Thomas Thompson, E , (1., '-g` t'ro.mitaraiialtnount; Russ ell- On London: Printed and Published by MURDO YD 111 at the San Offiee, No. 119, Streak