The Sun. — London, England, 1856-07-24 00:00:00

thir lEtittion SUN OFF 1 1 7 E. Seven, o'clock. TATTERSALL'S.—(This Evening.) GOODWOOD STAKES. 5 to 1 agst Z,ta (offered) 10 to 1 agst Goldhill (offers to take) 10 to 1 agst Bandalore (taken) 15 to 1 agst Jolly Marine (taken) 28 to 1 agst Vandal (taken) GOODWOOD CUP. 7to 2 agst Fisherman (taken) 7to 1 agst Yellow Jack (offered) 10 to 1 agst Muscovite (taken) 12 to 1 agst Vandermulin (taken) 14 to 1 agst Rogerthorpe (offered) STEWARDS' CUP. 7to 1 agst Flacrow (offered) 20 to 1 agst Queen Mab filly (taken) A.P.IIIVALS AT GOODWOOD.—FazzoIAto, Paletot, Van• dal, Grteculus Esuriene, Vindex, Victoria, Beatrice, Imperieuse, and Bannockburn. The following are struck out of their engagements at Gor,dwood :—Mishap, out of all engagements, entered by Mr. Stanley ; ;farces and Dulcamara, out of Nursery stakes; Merlin, Futbeck, and Lord Alfred, out of Ches. terfield Cap ; Merlin an 3 Lord Alfred, out of Stewards' Cup ; all Lord Derby's horses, except Paletot, Fazzo leotto, and Crown Pigeon. IPSWICH RACES.—(This Day.) TWO-YEAR OLD SWEEPSTAKES. Cu tty Queen Mairimifer f Two ran. SUFFOLK HANDICAP. Tag o' War Redemption Two ran. BOROUGEI MEMBER'S PLATE. Tug o' War Vestige Four ran. HANDICAP OF THREE SOPS. Unexpected 'Vestige Five ran. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF LORDS—(This Evening.) The LORD CHANCELLOR took his seat on the wool sack at five o'clock. Lord MONTEA.GLE presented a petition from cer tain learned societies, complaining, of the existing translation of the Bible, and praying for the appointment of a committee to revue the same. THE AFFRAY AT NENAGH. The Marquis of CLA.NRICARDE called the atten tion of the Secretary at War to the late affray at Nenagh between the militia and the regular troops, and asked what were the intentions of the Government with respect to that matter; He begged to offer a tribute of praise to the commanding officer, Sir J. Chatterton, for his prompt measnres on the occasion. Lord PANMURE said that the parties really guilty of the mutiny would be dealt with with firmness. The men of the militia who bad been guilty of the outrage on this occasion would be handed over to the civil tribunals. From information he hal received the ringleaders had been identified, and would be brought to justice. , Lord ELLENFOROUGH bore his testimony to the merits of the Irish militia. From returns he had re ceived he found the desertions from the English militia were 23 per cent., the Scotch 20 per cent., and the Irish only five per cent. The English gave recruits to the army at the rate of 7.1 per cent., the Scotch at 14i, and the Irish at 21. The latter was therefore the most valuable to the service of the country. THE LEGION OF HONOUR. Lord CALTHORPE called the attention of their lordships to the distribution of the Legion of Honour, and asked why it had not been conferred upon four gal lant officers who formed a portion of the staff of the lat 4 Lord 'Raglan, not withstanding the wish of the Emperor Napoleon, after the battle of Inkerman, to confer such a distinction upon the officers engaged. After a few observations from the Duke of CLEVE• LAND and Lnrd COLCHESTER, Lord PANINTURE said the Commander-in-Chief had forwarded to officers commanding in the Crimea instructions to send over the names of those officers entitled to the distinction. The names were transmitted by the Minister of Foreign Af fairs to Paris. lie believed that General Simp.on and Sir W. Codrington had made the selection of those names without any favour or affection. The Government were not responsihle for the selection. He had referred to the Foreign-office to see whether any correspondence existed on the subject, but he could not discover any. There was no slur whatever intended by the alleged omissions on the memory of Lord Raglan. (Hear. hear) There was not an officer on the staff of Lord Raglan who lead not received one step in iv , - motion if not two. Col. Somerset had received the dis tinction of Commandership of the Bath in addition to a Lieutenant-Colonelcy before he left this country, and he was too yountx to receive the next step, becau , e by such promotion being made a Dumber of serdor officers would have to be passed over. The Earl of ELLENBOROUGH said he believed the claim of Colonel Somerset was urged co. the score of his father's services. Now, it was his opinion that distinction should never be conferred for vicarious services, otherwise there was a deception, and a soldier would be ashamed to wear it. The rule h s had laid down when he was in India, he believed, wa.s the cor rect one, and it ',vas that a soldier should nevNer receive a military medal unless for services under fin!. [LEFT SITTING.] HOUSE OF COMMONS.--(This Day.) The SPEAKER took the chair shortly after 11 o'clock. PRIVATE BUSINESS. The Lards' amendments to the Scottish Central Rail way Bill were considered and agreed to. and also those of the Perth Burgh and Harbour (No. 2) Bill., NEW MEMBER. Captain STURT took the oaths and his seat for the borough of D ,rchetlter. THE BISHOPS OF LONDON AND DURHAM RETIREMENT BILL. On the motion that thithouse go) into committee on this hill. Mr. HADFIELDhnoved that it be comm j tted that day three months. The popnlation of this cou:ntry was 27.000,000. nut of which 9,000,000 only belonii ed to the Established Church, and yet they were asked "to grant a retiring pension of 6,0001. a-year to the Bishoii of Lon don, and of 4,500/. per annum to the Bishop oil, Durham a year. The 6th and 7th Viet. stipulates thri t the sa lary for' the diocese of London shall be 10.i:100/. per annum, yet the bishop actually received 22,000?., whilst out of the 10,000 working clergymen throw flout the country many of their salaries did not average 1001. per annum. (Hear, hear.) The hon. gentleman then re ferred to the oareer of the Bishop of London, at id stated that he had received from the Church for four years during the time he was Bishop of Chester, 12, 0.:10/ , and for then yea,rsbe had been Bishop of London, 6116,0001., making together 623,000/., be'ides possessing- the pa tronage of 97 livings, valued at 70,000i'. The Bishop of Durham had received 320,0001., hen he should ha ve rece i ved b et 160,0001., and he rt !so pos sessed the patronage of 47 livings. These r ev. pre lates had enjoyed an income greater than art v digni taries of any other church, and far above ti 'at paid to the Ministers of the Crown. Together th ese rev. ' gentlemen hail received from the Church 97"3,0001., and it was disgraceful for them to come to this house and stipulate that they should receive a retiring; allow ance for relinquishing offices they were nn m ble effi ciently to discharge the duties of. He coil demned bishops having seats in the Upper House, nd said they bad always shown themselves the obstructors of regress. Mr. NEWDEGATE said that the best answer that could be given to the strictures of Mr. Hadfield! on the Bishop of London and the necessity of their ranting him a pension, was the fact before the hou m.e, that hie liberality to his poorer brethren bad 1 tft him almost destitute. He supported the motion for going i into committee, and asked the noble lord f it was his intention to introduce next session a general m m measure n this subject, and defining the terms on which ibishops honld resign ? The Marquis of BLANFOIID was of opinion that, a general measure should be introduced, for nothim I would obring greater scandal on the Church and do he cr more mischief than introducing spec's.' measures wh 3 n any prelate wished to resign. He supported the second reading of this bill, because he thought the want of the diocese required efficient supervision, which cot ild not be obtained without a measure of this kind. :if this owe were made a precedent,he thought itwould h : i.ve the effect of connecting the Church too closely with the State, and give it a political character it ought not to possess. Mr. MOWBRAY hoped the Government would pledge themselves to bring in .a general measurii next session, but riot of the character of the measure ra leered t o the previous cl,my by the right hon. baronet the. mem ber for Carlisle. He hoped this measure would be taken as a precedent for the resignation of bishops as UC4ne had taken place since the reformation, but not with t .egard to its details. He objected to the present state of :things and was at a lose to understand how any Churi :h rear , could consider that a " tolerably satisfactory sti ate of things," where one bishop had to assist another ion ac count of his age and infirmities. A more danger t.ue ar gument could not be used by the friends of the Cluurch. He urged on the noble rd in considering this isiabject that he would not confine any general measure be ;might la t"duce, to provide for the retirement of bishops, but f•'r the extera-ion of the episcopate by the division o diPceseq. Sir J FITZGERALD opposed the bill on tccour , t of its exclusive enaracter. A geoeral measure should be introduce , ' ext-rpling it to al the clergy. Mr. HILDYARD should obj- , ct to any general ales cur.- based upos the principles of this bill. The mos . pressing spiritual destitution was the inadequate pros , ' sion for the working clergy, and he objected to the funds a pplicable to them being diminished under any circum stances. Of all functionaries bishops were looked at with less c )niideration than any other, and as in reference to their religious animosities and prejudices showed themselves it was necessary the utmost caution should be used in dealine with them. Lord PALMERSTON said that as to the intention of the Government with reference to a general measure, he could not then give a direct answer. Had there been a general measure introduced there must have been clauses makin; exceptional provisions for these two particular sees. If the Government should bring in a general measure next session, it would be on their re sponsibility, and nothing that had been said in the course of this debate would be considered as a pledge to support or oppose such a measure. It must be con sidered entirely on its own merits. A bishop ought not to be allowed to retire at his discretion, nor at the wish of the Government of the day. A bishop willing to re sign should show physical infirmities and incompetency to discharge his duties, and when such existed, and the bishop refused to resign, he ought to be compelled. He considered special legislation in these cases objec tional,le. After some remarks from Mr. HENLEY, Mr KINNAIRD said that the Bishop of London had administered his revenue with liberality. He had built a church at his own expense, with a rectory house, and had endowed it. Mr. PELLA.TT supported the original motion. Mr. HADFIELD withdrew his motion. The house then went into committee. On clausel, providing for the retirement of the Bishops of London and Durham, Mr. GLADSTONE, in moving an amendment ou the clause, denied that be and those who thought with him on the measure had raised technical objections to the bill, but bad founded them on true principles, recognised throughout Christendom. One objection he had to the bill was, that it was a bill for sanctioning an individual bargain, which would not be necessary in a general mea sure, To raise the question, he moved that the words of the clause, " by the said Charles James, Lord Bishop of London" should be struck out, and the words "by any bishop of the province" inserted. Sir G. GREY said the alteration proposed would so affect the other portions of the bill that the adoption of the words would virtually negative the bill, because it would give it a general character. Sir J. GRAHAM asked if the letter dated 21st June was the first communication received from the Bishop of Durham, with reference to the amount of retiring allowance, and whether that letter was not the ultima tum that passed between the Government and the bishop. He understcod there were repeated communications be tween them, and that a larger sum was asked by the bishop. Lord PALMERSTON said he first heard of the Bishop of Durham's wish to resign in the autun n. After that he was informed the right rev, prelate did not wish to resign, and the matter dropped. After that he had a verbal communication from the bishop, and the first intimation in writing relative to the allowance was contained in the letter referred to. Sir J. SHELLEY said that with reference to the Bishop of London he was enabled to state that the only proposition ever made by him was contained in the pub lished correspondence. _ _ _ Mr. E. DENISON objected to the introduction of the. words. It would be impossible to make this a general measure, and if they admitted the words, difficulties would occur at every stage. Mr. HENLEY did not consider these words would have the effect of making the measure a general one, or would compel alteration in the other clauses of the bill. Mr. GLADSTONE said that was so. What he wanted to do was to make the Law of Resignation gene ral. This bill did not propose to authorise resignation but to allow it, and the alteration he proposed would remove any doubts that might hereafter arise in regard to filling up a bishoprick under this bill. Mr. NA PIER having addressed a few remarks to the committee, The SOLICITOR-GENERAL addressed the com mittee at some length, in the course of which he contended that the charge of simony did not apply to the arrangement under consideration, and it was to be regretted it should have been introduced into the debate. Any person con versant with the law and ecclesiastical history must be aware that what was now proposed was in strict con formity with the law of the Church, and with the muni cipal and conventional law on the subject of simony. The hon. and learned gentleman cited the resignation of the Bishop of Durham in the 13th century, and that ref Archbishop Grindell in the latter period of Queen Elizabeth's reign. In these casesstipulations were made by the bishops for resigning their sees. Mr. GLADSTONE said the cases quoted by the learned Attorney-General did not touch the cases now under consideration in the slightest degree, and he had conveyed to the house an unfair impression of the cha racter of these cases. Tee point at issue was not that it was improper to assign a maintenance to a bishop on his resigning his bishopric, for that had been admitted by the hon. member fur Finsbury, who was not over favour able to bishops—(laughter)—but the question was whether the house could have, or ought to have, or there ever had been an individual bargain—(hear)—for a re signation in which there was an engagement to receive a pension made a condition of the resignation. (Hear, hear.) That was the whole point at issue, and the learned Attorney General ought to have known it. In the case of the Bishop of Durham, in the 13th century, there was no bargain for a resignation, and so far as Arch bishop Grindell was concerned he had an intimation of rather a significant character from the Queen to resign, which was more full of meaning than anything proceed. ing from that house ; and it was after he had resigned unconditionally that he asked for a residence with some land at Croydon. The right hon. gentleman contended at some length that the sargain between the Bishops of London and Durham and the Government partook of I shoofly. Ttfe SOLICITOR-GENERAL, in reply, and amidst much laughter, said that the right hon. gentleman the member for Oxford University had shifted his ground with the dexterity of a special pleader, and had shown how dangerous a thing was a little memory (Laughter.) The learned gentleman reiterated that the cases he had quoted were in point. In the case of the Bishop of Durham, he stipulated, on resigning, that he should have his palace at Stockton, 35e..; and as regarded Archbishop Griradell, be stipulated for three things, two of which were the dwelling at Croy don and to the freedom of dilapidation. Mr. GLADSTONE contended the learned Attorney- General was in error. The grounds, &c., at Croydon, asked for by Archbishop Grindell, were not, he (Mr. Gladstone) contended, conditions of his resignation. In the case of the Bishop of Durham, the enjoyment of the palace at Stockton was not a stipulation for resignation. Mri.NAPIER contended that there could not be by law a resignation with a condition annexed to it, and charged the Solicitor-General with attempting to mislead the house on a simple point oT law. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said that the Bishop of London had made no conditions contrary to the law of Henry VIII. The clause was then agreed to without a division. Oa clause 2, granting to the Bishop of London the use of the palace at Fulham, Mr. ROEBUCK moved its omission, but the clause was ultimately agreed to without a division. On clause 3, granting the two pensions, Mr. T. DUNCOMBE moved the omission of the words fixing the amount cf pension as a condition of their resigning. Colonel NORTH complained of the manner in which Mr. Hadfield had multiplied the income of the Bishop of London to increase prejudice against him, and said that the Bishop of London had not put it into his pocket, but had distributed it in charity. Mr. HADFIELD replied with some warmth, and said the charities of the right rev, prelate ought not to be vaunted before the public, seeing that be bad been charitable at the expense of the 10,000 clergymen of the country- Mr. G LADSTONE interposed, and the further dis cussion on the point was put an end to. After some remarks from Mr. HEA.DLAM, Mr. CARDWELL suggested two divisions should take place ou the amendment, because he thought the Bishop of Durham should only receive one-third of his recognised salary of 8,0001 per annum. The committee divided, when the numbers were— For the clause lO5 Against it Majority —7s Mr. ROEBUCK then moved that the sum of 6,000/. should be l reduced to 3,5001,, one third of his recognised 000/. a-y ear . The committee again, divided, when the numbers were : For the amendment Against it Majority against the amendment The other orders on the paper were disposed of, and it being four o'clock, by the forms of the house its sit ting was supended. The house resumed at 6 o'clock, and was [LEFT SITTING PRESENTATION OF COLOURS.—New colours were pre sented to the 25th Regiment, or King's Own Bordererp, yesterday, at the Salford Barracks, by Lieut.. General Sir Harry Smith. The Mania for establishing Credit Mobiliers in Ger many shows no signs of subsiding. To those of Vienna, Frankfort, Darmstadt, Leipsic, Dessau, and others, of which the shares are at premiums ranging from 10 to 90 per cent., there are now two additions which have just been introduced at Berlin. The first consists of several second-rate merchant, and bankers. The other, which is designated the Society of Commer c i a l C red i t, c ou n ts among its administrators some of the first mer cmitile names in Berlin. The capital is fixed at 15,000,000 thalers (or 2,250,0001.), of which the directors t a k e 7,500,000 thalers at par , while the remainder are to be sold at a premium, which is to be carried to the credit of the com p an y. Upon a subscription being opened for a portion o f the amount at 1 0 premium applications were sent in to the extent of 140,000,000 thalers. The eagerness to obtain shares is attributable to the fact of the company having at its bead commercial men who have always been known to be successful. The'managers reserve to themselves 5 per cent. out of the profit s, and the d irectors are to have 5 per cent, before any distribu tion whatever is made to the shareholders. The shares are of 200 thalers each, and are already in great demand at 17 per cent, premium. t r ~ r ~. ~ ~ 1 1" E SUN; 1.14] I'AaLIA V AN FA itY HOME OF CONIMONS.-JuLy 23. WM, THURSDAY EVENINO, JULY 24, 315110P3 OF LONDON AND DURIIA3I RETIRE- ill ENT BILL. Order read for resuming adjourned debate on Question, " That the Bill be now read a second time :"—Question again proposed :—Debate resumed :—Atneadment pro posed, to leave out the word " now," and at the end of the Question to add the words " upon this day three months :"—Question put, " That the word ' now' stand part of the Question :'—The House divided ; Ayes 151, Noes 72• ATES-151. Agnew, Sir A. Gower, F. Osborne, R. Antrobus, E. Greene, Thomas Paget, Lord A. Baines, Rt. Hon. M. Gregson, Samuel Palmerston, Viscount Baldock, E. 11. Grenfell. Charles Patten, Col. 13all, J. Grey, Rt. Hon. Sir G. Peel, Sir R. Ld. R. Peel, F. A. Baring, Sir F. Groevesor, Grey', Bass, M. Beckett, W. Gurney, J. 11. Pinney, Col. Bark eley, F. Gwyn, /Towel • Ponsonby, A. Bethell, Sir R. Hall, Sir Benjamin Portman, W. Black, Adam Hankey, T. Price, W. Blandford, Marquis or Hardy, G. Pugh, D. B .nham-Carter, l J. Hastie, Archd. Ramsden, Sir J. Bouverie, Hon. E. P. Hayes, Sir E. Reed, J. Bowyer. G. Headiam, T. Ricardo, S. Brocklehurst, J. Herbert, P. Rich, 11. Brockman, E. D. Heywood, J. Rid'ey, George Bruce, Lord E. Horsman, E. Robertson, P. Buckley, Gen. Howard. C. Bolt, P. Butler, C. S. llutt, W. Russell, F. W. Cardwell, E. Ingham, R. Sandon, Viscount Castlerosse, Via. Ingram, H. Sawle, C. Carley, E. S. Ilion, S. Seymour, 11. Challis, T. Jones, D. Seymour, W. D. Chaplin, W. Kinnaird, A. Shelley, Sir J. Chelsea, Viscount Kirk, W. Smith, H. Cholmondeley, Lord Labouchere;Rt.Hon.H Smith, R. Cockburn, Sir A. J. E. Langton, Fl. (1. Spooner, R. Cocks, T. S. Lemon, Sir C. Stanley, Lord Coffin, W. Lewis, Sir .G. C. Stuart, Captain Carry, 11. T. L. Lindsay, Col. J. Thomason, G. Cowper, W. Littleton, E. Thornely, T. Craufurd, E. H. J. Lockhart, A. E. Tynte, Col. C. Cubitt, W Lowe, R. Villiers, C. Dashwood, Sir G. M'Gregor, John Walcott, Admiral. Davie, Sir H. R. F. Magan, W. WEL:pole, S. Denison, J. E. Matins, Richard Watkins, Col. De Vere, S. E. Marjoribanks, D. Wigram, Loftus T. Ms-ea. E. Martin, J. Wilkinson, W. Drumlanrig, Vie. Martin, P. Willcox, B. Duncan, Viscount Massey, W. Williams, W. Dune's'', George Milnes, R. Williams, S r W. Dundm. F. Moffat, G. Wilson, J. Esmonde, J. Monett. Via. Wood, Sir C. Farnham, E. Moncreiff, J. Wrightson, W. Feilden, M. Mostyn, E. Wynn, S r W. Ferguson, Colonel NI owatt, F. Wyvill, M. Ferguson. J. Mowbray, J. R. Forster, John Mullings, J. R. Fort/ scue, C. S. Neeld, John Freestun, Colonel Nisbet, R Glyn, G. Norreys, Sir D. TELLERS. Ilayter, W. Mu'grave Earl of, ARCHDEACOv DRNISoIV'S CASE. BATH, WEDNZSDAY. Ye,terday the Court ruled that the citaticn which !lad been ()Ejected to by Dr. Phiaimore was goo I ; that the artic;es being informal should be amended ; and on the question a+ t ) filing the report in due time and in the proper place, Dr. Lusbington said it was a question which would take him time to consider, and he, therefore, deferred it till this day. Dr. Phillimore then said that if his objections were overruled by the Court he should appeal for an adjourn. ment of the case before its merits were gone into, so that he might appeal to the superior court°, which were not now sitting, to see if they would confirm or nega tive the decision of his Grace. Dr. Phillimore told the Court that the articles bad been re-lornied, and that he had no fault to find with the amendment. Dr. Luehington then proceeded to deliver his opinion of the question which was brought before him yesterday, and which we have alluded to above. The learned doctor observed :—The objection to be disposed of arose in the following manner—lt was alleged on the part of the archdeacon, that in these proceedings the directions by the statute had not been complied with, and it was argued that the consequence of non-compliance was that his grace must dismiss the defendant. On the other side it was averred that the prosecutor had done all in his power, and that be ought not to be made responsible for the portions of the statute which it was not in his power to prevent. He could not accede to the argument on the part of the defendant, that to the extent to which it had been embodied it might be legitimately received. He thought it the statute had been so framed that it was all but impossible to carry its provisions into effect, or from whatever cause directions contained in it had not been obeyed, if these directions were essential to the administration of justice, or if the defen dant had been deprived by the non.obs-rvance thereof of any means of defence, he was entitled to avail himself of such error, and not to be subj-cted to this prosecution. The solution of the question appeared to depend on the nature, quality, and effects t.f the directions said to be vielaterl, and how far such direc tions have been neglected, or in what respect they affect the essential parts of the case. It could not be success fully contended, in proceedings wherein the statute it self gave so much latitude as to the course to he pursued, that every unimeortaret direction should, even iu a cri urinal case, vitiate the whole, and entitle the defendant to be dissatisfied. Let them first consider the conse quences. Such a principle, if adopted, would apply not only to a case like this, but to those of a more serious nature, both to the C-iurcti and defendant, and would equally throw a shield of protection over charges of blasphemy, and evils of the grossest not tare. The fear of such cense 4 u-races ought not, to deter him from following the due cnurse of law, if that course be clear; butnenecould deny that tiny would deserve most serious consideration. He did not forget that the accused was liable to the bene fit of all reasonable doubt, but he did not accede to the arguments advanced on either side as to the mode by which he was to arrive at such conclusion. He he lteved that for the last 30 years the judges of the lowl— and beyond all doubt the legislature—had di-couraged technical obj-ctions ; and - though the ecclesiastical law had not undergone s miler legis!ative change be appre headed that the disposition which bad animated courts of justice ought not to be wholly discarded by him as legal assessor for his grace under a new course of pro- ceeding established by parliament. At he same time he disclaimed the reasoning that had been offered on the part of the prosecution, as any excuse for the omission of any essential conditions. The learned gentleman then proceeded to show what course the statute pre scribed, and remarked that he was of opinion that the transmitting of the report was simply ministerial, and it was wholly incompetent for the commissioners when they had pronounced an opinion to alter the report in any respect whatever that was not conformable to the opinion declared. The report was to be filed in the re gistry of the diocese, and no time was fixed when the re port should be filed. It was not for him to justify the whole of the statute, but he could not fix a period when the legislature had fixed none. The report was filed, if he were right, originally in the registry of London, and an office copy was filed with it in August, 1355, in the dio- cese of Bath and Wells ; but the , office copy and the original depositions were not transmitted to Wells until the beginning of June, after the aiticlea now attempte3 to be acted upon were filed, and the question now asked wai, whether the Court should pronounce that filing of the articles before the original depositions were filed was or was not a fatal error ; and if they were called upon to dismiss the defendant ? It was quite clear, he thought, that the defendant had suffered no real injury from any irregularity, and he was not prepared to say that an office copy was not equivalent to the original depositions themselves. He concluded that the archbishop had no other choice bet to proceed, and that the objection could not be sustained. Toe application of Dr. Phillimore to be allowed to ap , pe tl to a superior court, was now by implication re fused; and the Rev. W. James, of Wells, was called, and examined on the part of the prosecution. Tne rev. gentleman simply spoke to having received certain pamphlets from Archdeacon Denison, being copies of sermons preached by him. The Rev. C. E Ditchard offered similar evilence. Mr. Everitt, mayor of Wells, was also examined upon the fact of having heard and read some of the defendant's sermons, in one of which he found the following : "The bread and wino, retaining their very natural sub stance, become in some ineffable way the body and blood of Christ, through the consecrating power of the priest." This passage struck him more forcibly than any other part of the sermon. He heard this preached by the rev. defendant on the 7th of August, 1853. Cross-examint-d by Mr. Philiimore—l do not recollect the c intext. It calked a great sensation among those who sat near rne. I sent a copy of the sermon to Arch deacon Law, who came to me, and asked if I would swear to having heard these words preached by the de fiaetant, and atter some hesitation, I said I would do so. Mr. T. Syrrell was next examined, and sub-equenfly Bishop Carr—His lordship recollected sitting on the counros.ion at Clevedon, and reporting upon the case of the defendant to his Gr.ce the Archbishop of Caeferbury. Cross-examined—l refused to receiva a plea on behalf of the rev. defendant, and we came to the conclusion that we would not hear counsel or the party in person on the question of doctrine. Dr. Peillitnore now addressed the Court at great length on two objections. Toe first was that the archdeacon had not been tried by impartial. judeee ; secondly, that the common right of the meane4 individual had been refused to the accused. The learned advocate voted several high authorities with a view of proving that the commission gas not properly constituted, and that in consequence his grace must dismiss the archdeacon, whom he considered to be a cruelty ill used and persecuted, but good man, whose triumph over his accusers was morally otrain. Dr. Bayford having combatted the various legal argu ments adduced by Dr. Phillimore, The Court decided that the objection raised did not vitiate the report, so as to prevent the case being fully heard. Dr. Phillirnore subsequently applied for the case to be adjourned, in order that he might appeal to a superior Court, when Dr. Lushington said he thought the defendant was entitled to make an application, and also to hilve it over ruled. It was open for him to apply to the Lord Chan cellor or the Master of the Rolls. A question was then raised on behalf of the defendant as to the insufficiency of the evidence respecting the printing and publishing tho three sermons, when it was decided that as regards two of them the objection was not good, but respecting the third it was held that the evidence was insufficient. The Court was then adjourned till to•morrow. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. HOME CIRCUIT.—MAIDSTONE, Jelly 23. kCrown Side.—Before Mr. Justice Erle.) • Robert Osborne, 19, was indicted fur stealing; two post letters c mtaining money, the property of the Postmaster- Gen Mr. Wordsworth and Mr. Woollett conducted the prosecution ; the prisoner was defended by Mr. Campbell. It appeared that the prisoner was in the service of a person who keeps the post-office at Bexley-heal), but wasti not employed in any way in cooneetion with the duties of that office ; but, of course, he had opportuni ties of going to the letter box, and it would seem that he contrived to abstract letters therefrom. In conse quence of numerous complaints of the loss of letters, two "test letters,"as they are called—oneof which con tained three halfisovereigns, and the other a half-sove reign and two sixpences, the whole of which coins were marked so as to render them cspahle of being identiEed y were posted at the General Post office for delivery in the Bexley•heath district. At the time whee, in the ordinary course, t , iey would have arrived at their destination Mr. Sculthorpe, one of the principal clerks in the Post-nffioe, accompanied by Peake, the offic , r of the establishment, proceeded to Bexley, and upon exa mining the box it was found that the letters ha i been abq•acted. Mr. Sctethorpe at once suspected, from the inquiries he made, that the prisoner was the disho• nest person, and he asked him to produce what money he had in ;is pocket. The prisoner did so, and among it WAS nne oft e marked sixpenceQ, which Mr. Sc d thorpe immediately idol] iGed, and he thee direr ly ac cused the prisoner of stealing the two letters, and he ad :pitted he had done so, and said that he had bought,a watch with the three balf-sovereigns he had taken out of the letter. The jury found the priaorer guilty, and he wag sen tore. Fto be imprisoned and. kept to hard labour for 12 months. Attriuste Windier, 23, one of the German Legion, was indicted for feloniously cutting and wounding Henry Deena, one of his °miracles, with intent to do him grievous bodily harm It appeared that on the 10th of May last the prisoner, the prosecutor, and another foreign so'dier were at a public-house called the Alma Tavern, at Foihestone, when some altercation took place between them, aria the prosecutor laid hold of the prisoner and pushed Lim away from him, The prisoner upon this retreated two or three paces, drew a knife from his socket, and rushed at the prosecutor and stabbed bim on the shoulder, and then ran out of the house. The prosecutor was not at first aware that he bad been wounOe 1, but shortly af terwards Le found that be was bleeding, and upon fxa• mining his clothes be found that they had been com pletely stabbed through. The actual injury infi cited upon his person appeared, however, to 'be of a very trifling character. The prisoner was found guilty of :unlawfully wound in;, and sentenced to six Meeks' hara labour. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS.—TuesIay, July 22. (Bef9re Mr. Creaqv.) . . James ray/or, 42, was finod guilts of having stolen a c a', vaitLf; 205.. toe pruperty of George ?,louts It was proved that he had been previ,usly c-nvicted, and that he had been fr• qiiently in prison, whyre he was re , , , arded as a bights skilled workman at his trade, that of a carpenter. In 1842 he was sentenced to 12 months, and his last term was nine months in 1855. Mr. Creasy said be appeared to be a regular thief, and sentenced him to four years' penal servitude. Edward Etans, 31, labourer, was indicted for having stolen a clarionet, the property of John M`Carthy, from his person. The prosecutor was an itinerant musician, and his evidence was that on the 25th of June he was on his way back to London from a fair he had been to, when he called at a public-house at Ealing to get some beer, and to earn a few pence by playing his clarionet. There were a number of persons assembled there, among them the prisoner, and some disturbance took place about a pot of beer. Prosecutor arid a companion, a man named Bod gers, went out, followed by the prisoner and two others, who asked him to play them a tune. He did so, and they told him that by going up a certain lane they would save a mile and a half in the journey to London. When they got up the lane they found there was no thorough fare, and on turning round they saw the prisoner fellow ing them. The prisoner went up to M`Carthy and said as he had bad so much to say about the pot of beer he might take that, at the same time giving him a blow on the right eye. He was knocked down, and the prisoner then snatched thw clarionet from his hand and ran away. After searching for a policeman for some time he at length fount one, and they then began to search for the prisoner, who, with his companions, was ultimately discovered on the top of a hayrick, pretend. ing to be asleep. Every effort was made to find the clarionet, but without success. The prisoner said it was only a fair fight, and he knew nothing of the clari , met. Bodgers, in reply to the jury, said that M‘Carthy was quite sober at the time, and that be saw the clarionet in his left hand at the moment the prisoner struck him. The jury fotind the prisoner Guilty, and a document was produced showing that the prisoner hail been *en tenced to three months' imprisonment at Reading for stealing lead from the Great Western Rail ay Mr. Creasy sentenced him to four months' hard labour, and hoped this would be a caution to him, as no such leniency c .uld be shown him again. Joseph Simpson, who wa. convicted last week of as saulting Henry Loinack Eluonds, with intent to rob him by the "garotte" method, was brought up fot judgment. Mr. Creasy said it was a most fortunate circumstance for the prisoner that the robbery, which clearly was the object of the assault, was not effected, because if ii bad been he would have been sentenced to a long term of transportation or penal servitude. The offence he was found guilty of was an asault only, but it was ono of a most serious character—a case of garotting, and all such cases must be visited by severity of punishment. He then sentenced Lim t•o 18 months' hard labour. William Thompson, 27, was found Guilty of stealing a pint pewter pot and a knife, the property of Martin Gahekiss, a publican, and for assaulting Henry Clark and Joseph Norton, two constables, who took him in charge. Mr. Creasy sentenced Min to eight months' hard labour.—Adjourned. NOES-72. Annesley, Earl of Graham, Lord M. Murrough, J. P. Beresford, Itt. lie. W. Growm. Edward Na der, J. Berkeley, Hon. H. F. Hadfield. George Newdegate, C. Brady, J. Hale, Robert Noel, G. Bramley-Wore, J. ' Hall,' i ieneral John North, Col. J. itramston, T. W Hamilton, G. A. Palmer, Robert Bruce, H. A. Ila,nilton, J, Pechell, Sir G. Burrell, Sir C. Henley, J Peel, Gen. 'Aititon, Lord R. Herbert, Sir T. Pilkington, J. Codrineton, Sir C. W. ilildyard, R. C. Powle• t, Lord W. Coles, 11. Hume, W. ltepton. G. Cono!ly, T. Joiliffe, Sir W. Roebuck, J. A. Ballteidi, Earl Kennedy, T. Scholefleld, W. Beedes, William Kershaw, J. Stafford, A. Disraeli, B. King, L. Stracey, Sir H. Buncombe, Thomas Knightley, R. Taylor, Colonel Buncombe. ilon.W E. Leslie, C. C. Tite, W. Elm ey, Viscount Lowther,•Col. H.-C. Tomline, G. Fitz Gerald, Sir John Lowther, Capt. Vance, John Fitzgerald, W. R. S. Lushington, C. M. Vernon, V. Fox, W. J. Fuller, A. E. 3Mrseculix,reszret,.James Willoughby, Yorke, F. Sir IL Gaskell, J. Morgan, 0. T ELLEII3. Gladstone, W. Morris, D. Cecil, Lord Gra:v. am, Sir J. Mundy, W. Heathcoate, Sir W. PAIRS. For. Mr. Shafto Lord Haddo Lord Haynham Colonel French Sir W. Somerville Sir E. Gooch Against. Colonel Knox Mr. Whitmore Mr. Seymer Mr. Holford Lord Bective Mr. J. Greene METROPOLITAN BOARD OF WORKS. A special adjourned meeting of the Metropolitan Board of Works was held yesterday in the Council-chamber, Guildhall. Mr. J. Thwaites in the chair. iTHE MAIN SOUTHERN DRAINAGE AND OUTFALL. Mr. BRISTOW, pursuant to notice, on the further consi deration of the report from the engineer on the outfall of main drainage on the south side of the Thames, and the letter of the First Commissioner of her Majesty's Works, asked the clerk of the board whether the proposed outfall in Erith marshes, inasmuch as the sewage would flow into the Thames in or near the metropolis, was not open to the same objetions as those stated in the First Commission er's...letter of the 2d day of July, 1856, or some of them? Mr. WOOLRYCII said that niider the 39th section of the Metropolis Local Management Act, he considered that the amended outfall in the Erith marshes was not affected by that section ; but the next question was, would the sewage flow into the Thames in or near the metropolis? That was a question of fact ; and mwit . depend on an examin tion.of all the circumstances. Now, as to. the words, `! in or near the 'metropolis," he conceived that it would be im possible to give any fixed definition to the word •`near." To say that a'person lived near Manchester migh mean that he lived three or four miles off, while to say a person lived near Manchester-square, might mean only a few yards from it ; but as the act required that the sewage should not be discharged within or near the metropolis. he did not con aider, looking at the spirit of the act of Parliament. that it would be sufficient to discharge it but a short distance from it, and that they should carry the whole of it to such a distance and to such a point that it should never again return within the metropolitan are 4;::; A letter was read from Capt. Burstal, !stating that the engineer had made a mistake as to the tide at which the sewage was to be discharged, and also that he was under the impression when he made his former report that the sewage was to be discharged invariably two hours before high water. The engineer admitted there was a mistake, but that was in his favour; and as to the discharge two hours be fore high water, that was only to take place under extra ordinary circumstances. The fel!owing notice on the paper was then considered : " Farther to consider report from the engineer on the outfalis of the main drainage and intercepting sewers below the boundary of the metropolitan area, the letter trom the First Commi.sioeer of her Majesty's Works, &c , ou the scheme of intercepting drainage south of the Thames, and the report of Captain Bursted with reference to the tidal stream in that river ; and toconsider the f dlowingmotion, pr• posed by Major Lyon and seconded by Mr. Dixon : " 'That the outfall in Erith marshes, as proposed by the engineer in his report of the 7th of July, be adopted, and that the discharge take place only at or after high water!' Mr. DOULTON believed that if they went to Government with a plan for the discharge of the sewage of the metro pelts at the point now proposed, it would be sent back to them in the same way as the preceding one; and as they were called upon to provid•e - an outfall that should be un• objectionable, he thought they should at once apply them • selves to its consideration. He concluded by moving, as an amendment, "That the engineer be directed to prepare a plan, with sections and estimates, for extending the main sewer to Lang Reach, and that the sewage be discharged there only at or after high water." Mr. flows seconded the amendment, and believed that it would be true economy to do the work properly in the first instance. Mr. DENNIS supported the amendment, and contended that they ought to carry tho sewage to a distant point from the metropolis, even though it might be at a cost of 10,000,000/. .Mr. WARE justified the course that had been pursued by the majority in sending the foreuer plan to Sir B. Hall, as h.) believed that the discharge in Plurnstead marshes would have prevented the sewage coming back to the metropolis ; but as they were now driven to incur a great additional expense, he should support the amendment. Mr. DIXON ridiculed the idea of going to such a distance down the river; for he had taken quantities of water from the foulest sewers discharging into the Thames, and he found that it did not contain cue-hundredth part of sewage matter ; and if that wore to run down for fivo hours he believed that it would then be so mixed with many thou sand parts of water that it woul.l be altogether free from sewage matter. Therefore, he was opposed to putting the ratepayers to such a large additional expense. Mr. SAVAGE believed they would never make a good job of the matter until they went below Gravesend; but at present he should support the amendment. Mr. HALL said there was a, complete disunion amongst the gentleman who opposed the scheme of the engineer; for while one wanted to send the sewage into the Thames in Long Reach, another thou,glit it should go to Sea Reach, and another would go to the sea shore ' • but there were those who thought that it should not go to either of those places, but the sewage should be deodorised where it was, instead of such an enormous expense being incurred in car rying it to such a distance from the metropolis. Those gentlemen wbo were not agreed upon apy plan of their own were landed together for the purpose of defeating the very reasonable plan of their engineer. Mr. WRIGHT had no fear that the present scheme would be rejected, although the First Commissioner had the power to do so, even without assigning any reason for doing so. He might of his own accord return any plan sent to him— he might even if they went to Long Reach or Sea Reach return their plans, and tell them that if they went there they would be spending too much of the ratepayers' money. He hoped the board would be careful how they passed the amendment now before them. The CHAIRMAN said there was a disposition on the part of Sir Benjamin Hall to receive a plan from this board that should carry out the work in a way that should be within the terms of the act of Parliament. Mr. LESLIE believed that the best course for them io adopt would be to make a clean slate end begin again. It had been urged that if they went further down the river they would incur great additional expense, but he was of opinion that if they did so they would save money, for then the a ork would be properly done. If he bad been allowed to bring forward his scheme he would have got them out of their difficulty, and in tead of forming a a cesspool at Barking Criek of 30 acres in extent, he would set Mi. B- , zalgette, their engineer, free, arni allow him to bring forward something that was practicable and reason able. Mr. 11. L. TAYLOR opposed the amendment. Mr. WILKINSON was of opinion that they ought to apply to Government tor this work to bo executed at the national expense. As a step to a practical movement in this matter he should support the amendment. Mr. 11AwKEs objected to the work being done in the " stamping" way now proposed. After some observations from Mr. IYlffanger, Mr. Bid good, and Mr. Deputy Ifirrisou, Mr. SEELEY said he was surprised at the spending ideas of some gentlemen on this matter, who were usually on the side of economy ; and he could not agreetospend a quarter of a million of money for this work more than was neces sary. The excess of the sum beyond what was required would furnish parks for the metropolis, and secure Hamp stead Heath for the benefit of the public. He was satisfied that the discharge at Erith marshes would be quite suffi cient, and he was not content to spend one farthing for going beyond it. The Chairman then put the question, when there ap peared— For the amendment l4 Against it The Chairman then gave hie casting vote in favour of the amendment. , Mr. WRIGHT then moved as another amendment, "That the engineer be instructed to report on the desirability of carrying the entire sewage of the metropolis, by means of one large tunnel, to Sea Reach." Au adjournment was move 1 , which was put and agreed to, and the board adjourned at five o'clock. POLICE INTELLIQENCE.-July 23. MANSION-HOUSE.—Joseph, Dann, waiter at the Antigallican public-hou , e, Billingsgate-market, was fur ther examined before Mr. Alderman Wire, charged with the manslaughter of Richard Branscombe. Mr. 11 ,- )bler at the last examination attended on behalf of the pri.ioner. Mr. T. Crosby, surgeon, of 13, Fenchurch-street, do. posed that be made a post ruortem examination of 'de ceased, but ;the body was so decomposed that it was impossible for him to tell whether the bead was bruised or not. The skull was not fractured. He attributed the death of the deceased to a shock of the system occa sioned by a fal ,r blow. Ho could not tell by the post mortem examination whether deceased was drunk at the time of his deat h. Mr. F. Bawl ?r, the brother of the landlord, who was examined at the last hearing of the case, Mr. W. S. Dame, a license d victualler, Mr. F. Cumming, de ceased's landlord, and Hezekiah Ingle, a waiter, were next examined, th , )ir evidence being mainly in confirma tion of that given ou the previous examination. Mr. Hob!er for trio prisoner submitted that the death resulted entirely from accident. With regard to the in quest having been ht ‘lil on the body so soon after death, the fact was that another inquest was being he'd close at hand at the time. The man was pronounced to be dead, and the coroner to ,k the opportunity of swearing the jury to inquire i:xto the circumstances connected with the death of Rich and Branscombe. The jury had returned a verdict of " Accidental death." Alderman Wire—Pr.obably, if there had not been so much haste in holdint; the inquest, the inquiry here might have been render tut unnecessary. I think that my brother alderman (fti.l Berman Humphery) not only discharged his duty to t b e public by ordering a post mortem examination of Id te deceased to be made, but that it would have been a. disgrace to the magistrates of the City if they had not in stituted further inquiry. As this i , a case affecting the I ife of a man, I do not think I should discharge my duty . if I did not send it to a higher tribunal. The prisoner wag than committee for trial, but arl mitred to bail ; himself is t 1001., and two sureties in 501. each. GUILDHALL. Catke rine Tkompson, a married 'woman ab nit 30 years of a ge, of very respectable appear ance, was placed at the ha r on the charge of attempting to commit suicid by trs•i og to throw herself over the parapet of Blackfriars-brio Ige. J nies Br one, a count r y lad, stated that be was on Blackfriars-bridge about o'clock that. morning when h, prisoner asked him it 'he thought there was sik feet of water there; to which Ihe ri-plied that he did not think there was. She then said there was enough for her, and immediately jumped up os the seat and put her foot on the parapet in order to lilt ip over, but was stopped by witoesQ, who called for assistance and gave her into custody. Po ice-constable 350 0 ,rroborated a portion of this witness's testimony, and Is lded that she gave various ac counts of herself both last night and this morning at the sta•inn-hun-e. Sir R. W. Carden—Ha ye you no friends ? Prisoner—Yes, I have a husband and friends in Loa don, but I will not send tt them. Sir R. W. Carden—Yot t are liable to 6 months' impri sonment for attempting your life, and unless you can bring some one here who s till give some account of you you must g o to prison. Prisoner--You ma.ydo ' with me what you please, but I will not give the names c f any of my friends, nor will I say anything more about .a..yself. Sir R. VT. Carden then nnauded her for a jveek, with in-tructiong to have herbro tight up sooner if slae gave the name of any ';f her friends. He also ordered 2s. 6d. to be given to Bmine for his l ,ss of time. BO W-STREET.—John iladdairt, of Tyler. street, Re gont•street, grocer, appear ed to answer a En IMMOII4 at the instance of the Excise Commissioners, charging him with having in his poi 'session a quantity - of adulte rated pepper. It was provod tl iat 40 per cent. of one parcel of pepper was rice, and 10 per cent. hardwood. Anotl ier parcel contained 10 per c ent. of hardwood. Mr. Henry ho pe d the public would be made as :quaint' , d with the facts of th e case, as he believed it wa ,, :not gene rally known that w 'od was used for adultieratiug' pepper. Mr. Dweily o h erred that hardwood was uged L-o a considerable extent > lot only in the adulteration of pepper but of snuff. Mr. ❑'welly said the officers had inspect AA the stocic of the who lesale house, who supplied the o lo fendant, and fou❑ d th at it was genuine. Mr. Henry fine I the defendant in the mitigated permit y of 50/. John, Daley, wh q) had evaded apprehension since th• 28th ult., was chl ► rged with having bee e concerned in stealing a ring fr o in Mr. Stocker, who was knocked down and ki:led High-street, St. Giles'a, on the morn ing of the day state !d. - - - It appeared that the prisoner was ono of those who were present when Ar.r. Stocker was knocl).ed down, and assisted in carrying h'im home. The prisoner then went away to drink with hio: companions. Denn is Leary (who was en SatrArday co to mitted for three months to steal , g a key fr 0 .31 the de cease d) and a young w oman named Margar e t Kealah, were of the party. One of the men was s',nt from the publi.c-liouse to sell a ring, and on his rete:l), according t o t h. t evidence of the wo man, Kealah, he gave the money (3.) he had obtained for it to Daley. Daley said, wit h n " You got mot .e than that ! you shall have none of the drink." Then an protested that he had recei, mire, and Daley :allowed him to have his share. Tne 31, was spent in drink amongst them, Inspector Chec kley Maid the prisoner was an exceed ingly bad charact :er. He was in the habit , of " ing" prostitutes, 1 won whose infamy he livod. He had been several tone lin custody, once for a violent assault upon one of those unhappy creatures with whom he ' as then living. alah was a fruit girl, a nd the p slice knew nothing to her disadvantage. She had lived bi Ch era-lane troth her childhood. The prisoner sai l tb,at the inspector way mistake. in stating that he wa a follower. In answer no Mr. Henry, he said he would p lea I guilty, but that hti d.td not steal the ring himself. Mr Henry cm= 7i tted him for three mouths, with hard lab.,nr. The police are atilt in search of the man Dnody, by whom the ring was sold, and also for another of the party, who is survot el to he the actual thief. WESTMIY, SI 3 with having R _henry Bently , the di fiver of a 1 patent safety ca 0, appeared to a summons char ging him unl av brougham of Li n. d A ;fu lly, by careless driving, run. into the V. Tempest, and damal red it to the amount of - n p wa r a , of 51. Mr. Sleigh Mr. . nns Bi a•VY dea , i, ain support of the char g e, and de fel Ide a -- ' lto cabman. a ' Mr. Slei g h . ; i • • •J that • the com plaint was b opepaig his case, sail r. migl it f or w ard by his lordship 1 )urely on public grounc is, and if the defenda nt were disposed to plead gu il ty t a ' he might undertake to say that there .: a the charge him. wn- - 1 to desire to press for a penal ty Mr.against 13' ~„ d in - e clined to adopt this courAe, aad the evi dence was , goy to at considerable l en g th. The Earl of Bectiv 3 , M r' in Wm. Kennedy, and Mr. Inellar were called in s up port of the information. Two witnesses were cal ' le d f P the defence. Mr.. Arno Id said that the question for his cousidcra- Tir 11 1A56. tion was whither the defen.iant had committed an of fer.c. for which he yva,.? Fable, net , vhettic,r he had l)ee, , , guilty of cad eie-seeze; generals:, forth- e se geences of which he might Oe amenable iry action at I Lie certainly agreed with Mr artn4 that teat wa•4 iota case which it, w.is necessary shouA have beer breuglit turward on public ground,:, there being no soch iniehe e tiaviour to enti it the matter to be treated in that way, or enable any pereson to tak: merit up 'n Maisel for pro secuting on behalf of the public. There was no other carriage, it seemed, in Halkin.street when defendant nat first observed, and therefore nothing to induce him t ) fear collision when in the middle of the road, while the brougham turning into the street at a tolerably rapid pace there was hardly time afforded to prevent the car riages timing into collision. Although a man ought to be on his own side he could not say that defendant had been guilty of that sort of carelessness which would jus tify him in imposing a penalty upon him, although he or the owner of the cab might probably be civilly respons ible for the amount of datuazes. The summons was accordingly dismissed. MARYLEBONE. —M ary Anne Lynch, and Emma Burcher, paupers in Marylebone Workhouse, were charged with riotous and disorderly behaviour in that establish• ment. The prisoners, on being asked what they had to say, replied that the master came to them, and when ho ordered them to go to bed he had a whip under his arm. Burcher said she was going, when be seized hold of her, and called. f,,r the two porters, and then gave Green some money to buy some canes.' He brought some back, and Green and Brown, who had one each, commenced beat ing the whole of the girls that were there, and the reason why they (prisoners) were locked up was because they had no marks of violence on them, and there were three others who were so dreadfully cut about that the officer. , were afraid to bring them before the magistrate. Bur chell added that she was obliged to wash the face of OM, Of the girls, who was in much pain from the injury which she had received. Mr. Ryan said he wai compelled in self•defence to order the porters to use the cane. Mr. Broughton sent for the three girls, who, on being examined, were found to have weals and htuises upon their backs, shoulders, and other parts of their bodes. Mr. Broughton, after a careful investigation of the facts brought forward on each side, said he looked upon the case as one of considerable importance, inasmuch as ne;thrr the master of a workhouse nor any p , rson acting on his authority was justified by law in i, flicring per sonal chastisement on adults. He should ailj , urn the case for a week, and in the meantime the board of guar dians and directors would of course have all the facts of the case placed before them at their next t.ittieg. The prisoners we , e taken back to the workhouse, ae were also the girls who deposed to the caning inflicted upon them. LAMBETH.—Mrs. Alice Mills. the wife of an omni bus drivrr, was charged with having in her pos , ession a silver-gilt dessert spo , n, bearing the arms of GeorgH or Wtiliam IV., cf which she could not give a satisfactory account. The spon wag supposed to he a part of the property stolen on Saturday, the 15th March last, in front of the Masons' Arms public-house, Porche , ter-street, Paddin ton. A box containing plate, belonging to the Royal nursery, was taken from a van while the latter was on its way from Buckingham Palace to Windsor Caste, and Inspector Wilcher, of the d. tectives, was in consequence in attendance to hear the evidence. Police-constable Thomas Norman, 195 L, said be was called into the shop of Mr. Kitchards, pawnbroker, Westminster road, and the prisoner was pointed out as having just offered in pledge the dessert spoon produced. The shopman, observing the royal arms on the spoon, sent for him (witness). He questioned the woman, who said that her husband was an omnibus driver, and that about three weeks before his conductor found the spoon in the omnibus, and made her a present of it. This statement, together with her admission that she came from her resi dence in Camden-town to Westminster-road to pledg) it, did not satisfy him, and he took her to the station house. In reply to the charge the prisoner said the facts were those stated by the °facer, and said her husband was in attendance to corroborate them. Mr. Elliott declined to examine the husband, but de sired that the conductor spoken of might be sent for. Francis Drake said he was conductor of one of the yellow omnibuses plying between Hubigerford-market and Camden-town, of which the pri , oner's husband was the driver. About a fortnight ago, while going along the Tottenham-court-read he stopped at the end of Goodge street to put down a pa.sen , er, and while doing so he heard something drop from the omnibus, and picked up thespoon in question. He carried it to the end of his journey, and a , ked all the passengers as they got out whether it belonged to them, but none of them owned it. He then carried it to the house of the prisoner and her husband, with both of whom he dined on that day, and told Mrs. Mills, the prisoner, to place it on the shelf, and that any one claiming it might have it. He did not make the prisoner or her husband a present of the spoon. Mr. Witcher requested a remand, to give time for fur ther inquiry. Mr. Elliott complied with this request, and remanded the prisoner on hail to Saturday next. Charles and Henry Taylor, uncle and nephew, who had been remanded from Monday last on a charge of shooting two fowls, the property of Mr. Adams, a gen• tlewan residing on Peckham•ryo, surrendered to their trial in discharge of their recognisances. The magismrate was rather disposed to treat the charge as one of intended felony, but uhim del , / convicted the defendants in a per,a,lry of ion-• ^ HEALTH OF L9VDilv DUBING THE WEEK. ( From the Report of the Registrar-General. ) In the week that that ended on Saterday the death of 1,018 persons, viz , 551 males and 467 females, were registered in London. The average rininber in the ten corresponding weeks of the years 1846 55 was 1,932 end if this is raised in pr .portion ti' the increase population it becomes 1,135. The deaths of last week are therefore less by 117 than the rate of mortality which ruli-d in coirespen ling weeks would have pru duced.. The mortality of zymotic diseases in the aggreeate is bel , w the average. Six children and 2 adults died ef small-pox; diarrhoea exhibits a tendency to in c ease, and was fatal t, 56 ceililren ant 6 adults. Ut the 6:2 deaths from this disease 10 occurred en the south side of the river, the remainder on the north side. rehree children die 1 of cholera, viz., a boy, evil 6 months, at the Kensington workhouse, "cholera infa.utuni ;" a boy, aged 18 months, at 12, George's place, West, Berniondsev, " Eriglish cholera (2 days) ;" and a girl, aged 4 months, at 9, Burdett-street, Wa' worth, " infantile cholera (3 days)." The deaths from typhus and .common fever were 45, or rather fewer than in previous weeks. There were 16 deaths from typhus in the East districts, 7 in the Central districts, 11 in the North districts, 6 in the West districts, and only 5 in those districts on the Surrey side of the Thames. From phthisis 138 persons died, from dropsy and diseases of the heart 53, from apoplexy and paralysis 34, from deli rium tremens 4, and from intemperance 2. Five nonagenarians died, 3 females and 2 males. The 2 oldest persons recorded in the week's returns were a gentleman at Brixton, aged 97 years, and the widow of a gentleman at Ilaggerstone, aged also 97 years. wring the week the births of 798 boys and 765 girls, in all 1,563 children, were registered in London. In the ten corresponding weeks of the years 1846 55 the ave rage number. was 1,349. At the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, the mean height of the barometer in the week was 29 840 in. The mean temperature of the air was 60 . 1 deg., which is 1.9 deg. below the average of the same week in 38 years (as de termined by Mr. Glaieher.) The highest temperature in the week was 77'6 deg. on Tuesday ; and the iowest was 48 0 deg. on Tnoriday, when the range of temperature was 23.5 deg. Toe moan dew-point temperature was 541 deg., and the difference between this and the mean air temperature was 5 . 4 deg. The-mean temperature of the water of the Thames was 63.4 deg. ; its temperature ranged from 62 2 deg. to 64'7 deg. The direction of the wind was mouth-west. The rain measured by the gauge was 0'33 in., which fell nearly all on Tuesday. MORTALITY IN THE METROPOLIS NUMBER OR DEATHS FROM ALL CAUSES REGISTERED IN THE WEEK ENDING SATURDAY, JULY 19 Zymotic Diseases Diseases of Uncertain Seat Tubercular Diseases Diseases of the Brain, Nerves and Senses Diseases of the Heart and Blood-vessels 43 Diseases of the Lungs and other Organs of Respiration . .... Diseases of the Stomach, Liver, and other Organs '7O IShl. - of 18 ` , 5 Weekt West Districts North Districts 490,396 Central Districts 393,256 East Districts 485,522 South. Districts Totals Males 551 F3males BIRTHS IN THE WEEK. Males..... Females.. 798 765 Total .. ..1,563 of Digestion Diseases of the Kidneys, &c. Childbirth, Diseases of the Uterus, &e. Diseases of the Joints, Bones, and Muscles 9 Di se ases of the Skin, &c. Malformations 2 Premature Birth and Debility 25 Atrophy Old Age ;Sudden 1 Violence, Privation, Cold, and Intemperance 45 C a uses not specified 5 DEATHS FROM ♦LL CAUSES Copulation Deatns In corra- Deakm Enumerated. spending week In to , tADTERTISEMENT.] —Holloway's Ointment and Pills, 'undoubted remedies for swellings and btiffness or the Limbs.—Mr. J. P. King, chemist, of West Cowes, writes to Professor Holloway, that Robert Hunt, of East Cowes, fell from a scaffold three years ago, causing enormous swellings, which produced such a stiffness of the limbs as to i ncapac i tate hi m f rom walking. He tried all medical men, and was in the Newport Hospital for three years, but turned out incurable. After c onstantly using your Oi nt m en t and Pills fur four month s he is now perfectly cared.—Sold by all medicine venlors throughout the world ; at Professor Holloway's Esta blishments, 244, St ra nd, London ; and 80, Maiden lane, New York ; by A. Stamp, Constantinople ; A. Guidioy, Smyrna ; and El Muir, Malta. 4141, - • ' A T^ ' M,4 - xa'l446ti EDLNE:I . 3I),I-11 .g..I.IU'ET—Tut,Y There were in the market to- ley 14 racks o•itineal, 0- 11 weighing 2SO lbs imperial, whieh sold at 51s. bd. EDINBULLGH UAY AN - I) STIJAW JULY. 2 Supplies of all kinds these last six days large. Oat straw, from 12s 01 to 13a 6d per kemple of ;6 stones tron; wheat do., 103 0 , 1 to 1.3 s (hi; barley do.. 1 )v 01, to 6,1. Hay from is to 15,1. DALKEITFI ME ~ , L MARKET—JULY 21 There were in the market to-day 21 bags of oatmeal and bags barleymeal. Soles ready. Oatmeal, per sack of 2SOlbs First. Second. I Thiril• imperial Earle sal per ditto -s 0,1 —s Od : '-''' V A 1 Peasemeal, per ditto Flour, per ditto —s Od —s Od •"'3 al Pot-barley, per ditto DUBLIN, JULY 21. White wheat, 41s 0(1 to 46s Od ; red ditto, Ss to 44s 6 1, barley, --8 01 to —s 0,1 ; oats, 14s 6d to 16s 61 ; rapese , d; —s Od to -S Od per brl ; oatmeal, 16s 01 tol7s Od ; bak• flour, 23s Od to 26s Od per cwt; ladiameorn;29s 01 to 6 a per 480 lbs. BRISTOL SUGAR-JuLY 23. The market is quiet, and only fow refining sugars ha ve been soli to-day. Buyers seemed isinclined to operate, and merchants are by no means desirous of pressing sale' , and m have brouht frward their saples but sparinglY; There s © more d g oing o in ruin, and prices 'nave advanced la to 2d per gallon. COAL. AA lt 11E' Priem of Coal per ton at 1 a. d. r. JULY 23. the close of the market. Wallaeud, &a. Bate's West Hartley Buddle W. Bartley Byass'sWest Hartley 16 f 16 ( 16 hi ,‘ u . fee 20 S! 14 3 i3ell's Primrose bleb Main lB 9 I', traddyll l9 lelmont : l3 6 ,atubtou 1 # i7ramwellgate tusseti's Helton 19 u 4outli Helton 19 , 9 ietwi, Han u 18 i 4 .:venwootl 16 0 ;osfortii l7 Harvey Wylam 14 6 18 I sold &ward's West Bartley Netherton 16 Tanfield Moor ll C Canfield Moor Flutes 14 (I Walker Primrose C West Pelton l5 C. Grey's West Hartley l6 Pip] 51/11 l7 C New Tanfield l5 ‘! Hastings' Hartley l6 C tlettou .West Hartley _l6 Ships at market... elsA efne ‘B 11,11 signites that the =lv% are .onl from the General Post oftie y the sight—and Si by the morinug--:espatch.) .. . 1., 4.3 , wrea ma 1i....i , Froin e• LC W • COfiNTltlt4. n Genera. l'ipo Por due . -- 1 • .. O% London.* 1 - iiispActi . EE. _ .....1 1 ° . % M valorca(byllrit.pact ht• 4 - , sery irt4da* T.. l Liverpool . Weems americ,.. (by United S',, -',\ ~v, . ~ . i-'ackel.) •• • • ...... n , EVeiY 4 1 tieiday Southam..t, Weal/ Vnerlca (by U. Stitt, !t I - _ racket) ...... • .. ..,.. idverpos , •• ' t7stralia (via Liver- ,i O pool, .......... ..-. 4th and 19th -... Liverpool ...Twice M ht),, (v ..a .darseilles) 0 : ...., ,:. I.)0 i , di •• iitto (via Cape of (sow . , . fineertio n ....... ...• ~, • ••• war ifrica ( Wezt Coatrt)..l , ' ll of th" •nontl- . "Plymouth •• ilith ce .._ ~ exandria ..........1 , . 10th '.l 20th of , o Dover •......I#d •LL 19 _ 1 ' 1 .0 1.1exandria..........31 u.., ,La 'A.,. of mo ,Southampic , 4 'c s 1 w Llaharaas ............M 17th of the month South:Josh r 16th %Igiura ............N Daily.. Dover .... • d.. y ~ 3ra:sil .. ........ ....IV oth of the month.; Amthatnif to) July ILL Buenos Ayre5........M 'ti.), ~,, , i, in-,nt Southametm. July 16 . . Cape of Good Hope ...N Uncertain (Jaye of Good Hope ...Ti I f niLll Coo do Vends ....- ..1 0, - , ~, -. .... , ,,iil. - 4outhamp(or 16th L'L ... 1 10th and 2Gth . „ kt 99th Coyltm (sre InR4) . 4 & 96E a t, C0y10n..............1 , ,4th and 20th Channel Isles ~.......L: e.,,,,...f 7,,,&-„,k . ,1 lO a tharep , ..a , turf Chi1i.................. re I?? k- 17th ,r ; • noe t?,i Southarup o! 1 and 1b,., 4 and iv China .... Jrlth and 10th .... e id l 9 Constantinople ......: •: loth aid 26th.... Hover -- •• • • - 31 , d 24 '...lanstantinop:e .... Atli ct AA.. ot. -mil. 3d lllll3o aPtc , 1 31. day Cont. 01 Europe Pi a i N (wire cla4ly „.., .. Dover ...... ' , erica Egypt (see India) i ~.„-icodsl l/ ,'ranee ........ 2)4 he NITIvIce daily - ... . Dover ...... •- ~ .... c oy. libraltar .. -- - .., TA .1, 7, 17, 90, 27 •f m. ;oath ant, ,o' 6, • L ', , lrecce (ace India) 1 and 1 6 :4 , ..eytow-r, ..........0 , 1 ,,, ‘4 17t1) of MOIL 4 anti '.1311i. ,,,1 i - iamlnirgh - ........N ,Dailv • , lAVallnatl .......... ki 1 ill of tjl, lum it! iouthitinp , , 101-land. .. ~...... ~ 11 tinily mover.. vallY :londuras .......... le 117 t ) of the moon 4outhampt., '6th il 21 0 ,tiliit (v,.A.loot:lampt.iTri 111 1, 1 1 , 10th of MO, elymootti - ' 4 1- i y . 0 india (via Marseilles) M ;10 .hBc26th of ino , ' Dover ...... 15 46 - ionian Is:cs (see India) I I .... .... . Dover.... • Lrcland ...... •.lii 1. 6 .7.. , :l i'wltte 0,.P.y •'.,15hmi.....,..... „...f. , I2d it ~ o .. )t Z a,kir.s ............ , 1 ~,t or to, ~,,o iouthaptoi IC). L 6 t°A •48..leira. ~........ -NI 03-1 of moth m Liverpool ... Ault), (see India) , q , 10 9 Zalta ... . . .. ,- Nll, 10, 20, and 26 Dover .....«. •• -,'' ' L•fauritlus (see India) 1 ,i,tarttlus ..........:.‘ !20 .n of th-, mood , 15 ,9 tiel.lco .......... ...s M a ' ~f t 1.".. moot' ~ 4oathampt r ' t q'aples . ... ...... - .11 -, I Daily •••••• •• • • • • Dover ..... qTx Granada ..• . ..7‘. ; ' 7 , . I7th of mono ioutharnplo, fulY 18 lew Zeilani...•.. •• ..;Tel ;e a month . , Parlous poi.) Papal ).,,tates ...... -I\ Daily - • •• •• .• ! Dover -.... 1 week'' , Peninsula ...........lo - .. , ,olithurimi: , l6 0 Peru ...............Y , d A., 27th of m0 , .. 1- mithairt . I let ~•• - Port .Natal .• • • - ~...N Is or , vlto qhfo.... icily - ............ N s Fve-y Saturday.. Dover .... ~ Week', Tuscany ............, D.i1y......., .... ,7,sorvieortis..plor7 ienezuele ....„ - - -re td & .ith of ,no , the +out/Limp' ‘'i i , 160 Van Diemen's Lend (se , kustralia) ....... , , all of moo. .. . Wee' f n. 11,, , ' I ' IMonthlY - ' ''"*".'"i'L' 11 and 16, i , 16 02 II i m onthlY 11 16 - ~*^Ma, • [ADVERTISEMENT.] Among the numerous extraordin ary cures without medicine effected by Du Barry's deliel health-restoring Revalenta Arabica Food of Indigestiena (Dysdepsia), Flatulency, Constipation, Nervous, Bilious, AD Liver Complaints, Cough, asthma, Consumption, and Dehilq: the following are not the least remarkable : Cure No. 47,1 t, —Miss Elizabeth Jacobs, of Nazing Vicarage, Walthatner° ° ' lierts : a cure of extreme nervousness, indigestion gatherio4; low spirits, and nervous fancies. Cure No. 48,3 14 . -3 D Elizabeth Yeoman, Gateacre. near Liverpool : a cure of tee years' dyspepsia and all the horror s of n e rvous irritabilitl; 1 - 2, Patrick street, Cork, -4th mo., 4th, 18 9.—lte s P ecte‘i Friend,--I have given your Arabi ca Food to a girl of fifteen ; who duping, the last seven years ha- not been a day wi t h ,,; 11 0 vomiting fifteen or sixteen times, and sometimes oftener• d fourth day after she co mmence d your f oo d vom iting e ess i e t b altogether, and she ha s no t th rown up s i nce ; her hen . ..," is improving *wonderfully. WILLIAM MARTIN, M .D. of Supported by testimoni a l s f rom th e ce l e b ra t e d Professor s , Chemistry Dr. Andrew IJre ; Dr. Shorla,nd •; Dr. 139 ' 1./e ;',, l Dr. eatu,•bell ; Dr Gittiker ; Dr. Vv - urzer ; Dr. log`',"i o . ' Lord Stuart do De c i es ; th e D owager C oun t e ss of CO" ii i e stuart ; Major-Gen. Th omas Ki ng, an d man y o ther respects „ persons, whose health has been re s t ore d by it, a ft er all otb e ' means cf cure had failed. S u it a bly p ac k e d for all clituf s with full instructions. In canisters, " 51bs. , lie. ; 121bs super•refined, I lb., 6s. ; 21bs., lls. ; 51bs , 225. ; 101138., fhe 101bs. and 121bs. carr.age free, on receipt. of pod.offin. order, Barry du B arr y an d Co., 77, Regent-street, L00d°0,,,, Fortnum, Mason ' and Co., Purveyors to her Majesty , n e . 4, filly ; also at 60, Graceeliurch-street ; 33J and 451, Stran:iir; OleaPside ! Ccrnhill ; 42, Bishopsgate-street ; 55, C ora , ing-cross ; 54, Upper Baker-street; 63 and 157, ij n ` -- street. & rots, Asysivrissmsur.l &our AND HEARING —, SPECT,.- POWERFUL TELESCOPES, OPERA, RACE, AND PERSPFIho' GLASSES. — Messrs . S. and P. Solomous, opticians, 39, k ‘to i. marle-street, Observe—opposite the York rl u „"d By her Majesty's Royal Letters Patent for valuable 0.9.0-4 extraordinary improvements in the most powerful r e f. brilliant Telescopes, Camp, Racecourse, Opera, an u , spective Glasses, to know the distances of objects v' s iv y ° through them—of great importance to the army , n' and others. These telescopes possess such extra o rdin powers that some three and a-half inches, with an oxtra piece, will show distinctly Jupiter's moons, Saturns r i t ie and the double stars ; with the same telescope C 3ll seen a person's countenance three miles and a half disc; si t and an object from 16 to 20 miles. They are of larger an sizes, with increasing powers accordingly ; while their vt`i i r e mg from 4 to 6 in c hes e nable us to discover more thao ;id ibove, and the G eorg i an , w ith hi s 6 satellites, &S. ---rneP : o ollo Exhibition, 1851.—Valuable, newly-invented, VOL.Y ~ powerful waistcoat-pocket glass,the size of a walnut, b " o at a person can be se e n an d k nown 1 miles distant ; r se s, every purpose on the ra ce - course , and at the oper a " country scenery, and ships ar e clearly seen at Bto 10 to 0 They are invaluable for shooting, deer-stalking, Yach ti „% g e 'rs, sportsmen, gentlemen, gamekeepers, and tourists 'lOl race-course, camp, and perspective glasses, with Won' ° power. Newly-constructed Spectacl e Lenses of the ~ c r 4 est transparent power The valuable advantage dcri is from this invention is, that vision becoming impairsalß preserved and strengthened, and very aged Peen nu9 o n. enabled to employ their sight at the most miuute ocm, patiou- - can see with these lenses of a much less reagil„ei ing power—and they do not require the frequent eben o , to the dangerous effects of further powerful assistn'e"%. Deafness—New Discovery.—The Organic Vibrator, 333 , f o r traordiaary powerful, small, newly-invented instrunsen% r deafness ' entirely different from all others, to surptua 1 % 0 , thing of the kind that bas been, or probably ever 1 0 _0 , produe id. Being of the same colour as the skin, is not Yoh ceptible ; it enables deaf persons to hear distinctly at anti at public assemblies ; the unpleasant sensation of 901808 in the cars is entirely removed ; and it affords all its' assistance that possibly could be desired,-311, All eLaa r street. Piccadilly. Observe— opposite the Yolk IlotoL BIRTHS. OF A SON. grth On the 22d inst., at 5, Carlton-villas, Maida-va • F. E. Mawe. On tha loth inst., at Ashwell-Th or pe Hall, Isi° rf°ll° Lady Tyrwhitt. A. On the23dinst., at OF 9, I ein D stor AUGHTER -terrace, Cleveland.o4" ator the wife of Robert A. Mitchell, Esq. On the 23d inst., at Suanty Priory, near Ilarro.., wife of Samuel T. Faker, Esq. MARRIED. On the 22d inst., at Hampstead, Frank P. Fellowt o r o of Wolverh am pt on , t o L ou i sa M ar y, e ld e st daug o ' Rowland Hill, Esq., Secretary to the Post-office. Re On the 231 in s t., a t St Peter's, Mile-end, HWY lot ° Esq., of 131 , ickhesth to Sophia, third daughter of the Edward Thornhill, Esq., of Upper Clapion. .1.0 1 On the 2'd inst., at St John's, South Hackney, il°ool/ Appleton, Esq., of Maitl , no-place, Cl.pton, to Jane'oelds (I::tightr of William James Grant, Esq., of Lond °l3. Hackney. DIED. On the 2'd inst., at Elmer Lodge, Beckenha m E lward Richards Adams. Esi., aged 79. No d On the 21st inst., at Milbrook, Childe Okefo rd, ford, George Peach, Esq. , aged 78. ; tb e On the 20th inst., at Haften Hones, Arayleeb;r-iltcru Hon. Maria Corinna. wife of Capt C. Monteith oGort; 02,1 Highlaude:s, and third (laughter of Viscouuteorsio and, on the same day, in London, the Hon. JUlla G' Vereker, youngest daughter of Viscount GOrt. V, late At BiAop's Waltham, Heats, George Captain Royal Horse Artillery, aged 36. 1 V II. On the 20th inst., at Blcomtield.-road, , Baxter, Eig., aged 79. tog On the I,th inst., a t E v i ng t on , nea r Cheltenhavo, - Brook Faulkner. , lat o On the 17th inst., a t Ch e lt en h am , Colonel CalanY Rcyal Marine Artillery. - .7 ---- ----- ,__,_,..______-_. -------- ' fir /0, v/0 - 0 ai:.TEOI:4: Printed and Published by Mt CDO • - l'ot of No. 112, Strand, P - inter, at The SMA Coco, ~ i n' '' y of arr.no, in the P= eel let of t 1,,, Savoy. to We 641..-) 711 idate'et , Thursday, July 24, ISS 6. At f ti' I '4 856 :- Charles Edna, d Eski , John Al George i William Charles Jonatha The and aft , The have nc hibits a 30th J 1 making The 1 (lend at year, Al 11/.. pei Then /led to for the In co the 101 l Esq:, J, Killian 11111, El offer ti Cityley, duly qu the vac Capital Capital Guar= Beau Valance Balance and d ettarg Cash in India Linn dii Divides Divide tint; 1866 ouna c ebato to pn BAlance makii 0 Balance talauce The 1 Resol be a,ppr tors." The C r 3 tors Comps 4t, p after T Resol Jackson office, Direct° Resol k be elect Ail recto itesol ti it 4,:mirtbe 4 4 'lthirs c 'Reso 1 r th : IVAtesol o,,,flt9.lStarli ; , , P,C k ()] 'AOE, inp„ en< yiden Dated • T° c " Rive not let of At lteNi u ee ' ... .. eery ' , thee, le,irery licence, to Produi Ged. 111 • uted. • , rbte4_ • outtiepe ,14 etamp ~ • -• • Ind Ire' ;raokage .... ,r,ge •, an 'ne• who the rasp, a‘r , Wa .ty G. 3 wul. Col. sy ] Latex P. Gi bits. Ql, bard. Ba Yrs. J. • tlf-akile T. 11. 1 L. Ara. Ti a. %eel e. Mary Mrs. n %Ist.' A , • kftjo k r. ] 4tv in lir. ~tAr num, cemb J ,~ 'V 1 ~ ~ I N kt• STMT Co Cot r s . A. 7z