The Sun. — London, England, 1834-05-01 00:00:00

POLICE INTELMGENCE. MA RLBOR OUG MSTREET. Dennis O'Bryan, a tailor, was charged before Mr. CHAMBERS with stealing the sum of 13s. from a person of the name of James, under the following circumstances : James, who is also a tailor, deposed that on Satur day night he went to a meeting of the trade, held at the Coach and Horses in Carnaby-street ; while there be happened to produce a brass box, containing 13s, ; shortly after he found it was stolen, and in the pri soner's possession. The complainant, in reply to Mr. Chambers, said they both belonged to the trades' `union, and he had struck on Saturday night for an increase of wages. He was to be allowed 105. per week firing the time he was out of work. The prisoner in his defence said—When James en teresl the house he said he had no money. Finding he had, and suspecting he wanted to impose on the society, the box and money was taken away for the purpose of bringing the case before the committee to enable them to fine James for asserting a falsehood. Mr. CHAMBERS asked the prisoner several questions about the union, but he refused to answer them. The worthy magistrate was about discharging the prisoner, when he was informed that James had been threatened if he offered to give evidence. Mr. CHAMBERS--11 that case I send the prisoner to the Ohl Bailey, for we will see which is the strong est, the law or tile unions.—Committed. WORSHIP STREET. Tuesday morning a young woman of considerable personal attractions and of prepossessing manners, was brought before the sitting Magistrate, Mr. BROUGHTON, charged with having only an hour before attempted to throw herself into the Regent's-canal, near the North road, lloxton. Police. constable N 200, about 11 o'clock that morning, was informed that a young lady was seen sitting in a coal-shed, apparently in a distracted state 4 of mind, and being close to the water-side, suspicions arose that she contemplated self-destruction. Witness immediately repaired to the spot, and finding that she had left it, he pursued her and fortunately overtook her just as she was in the act of taking off her bonnet by the side of the canal, with intent, as it appeared, to throw herself in, but this was prevented by witness seizing her. In answer to questions put to her by wit ness, she said she was killing her husband, and that her intention was to have destroyed herself. Mr. BROUGHTON very feelingly addressed the pri soner, and asked her what her name was and where she lived ? The prisoner, after some hesitation, gave her name and address. Mr. BROUGHTON—What could have induced you to attempt such an act ? Prisoner—l am unhappy. I ana not always right in my mind. Police constable—She told me, that had I not fol lowed her, she would have destroyed herself. Prisoner (in an under tone)—l did say so, and in tended to have done it. Mr. BnouotrroN—ls your husband a good husband ? Prisoner—Excellent. He is too good ! Are you comfortable at home?—Yes. Then why attempt to make away with yourself ? have you done any thing wrong ? (In tears)—No ; the fact is, I am of a miserable disposition myself. Will you go home now?—Yes, if I am allowed to go by myself. Mr. BROUGHTON could not accede to her request, but if she chose to send for her husband, or go home with the officer, she was at liberty to do so. As to her going home alone was quite out of the question. Prisoner—Then I will go with the officer. The prisoner, who appeared to be labouring under extreme mental misery, here left the office with the constable. UNION-HALL Yesterday Robson Rogers, Thomas Oxley, and Mat thew Reed, three men belonging to the journeymen hatters' union, were brought before Mr. TRAILL, charged with committing a violent assault on Charles Tum mins, a hat-trimmer, in the employment of Mr. Moore, the extensive wholesale hatter of Castle-lane, South wark ; and the defendants were also charged with in timidating other workmen on the premises, and endea vouring to incite them to strike, and belong to the unions.—Mr. Nobler attended to prosecute. William Kinder, an apprentice to Mr. Moore, stated that on the preceding afternoon the three defendants came to his master's premises, and Rogers, addressing witness, said that if he was a young man like him, he would hang himself rather than be a knobstick and work on Mr. Moore's premises. Oxley, the other defendant, repeatedly called witness a knobstick ; and, finding that he was not disposed to enter into any dispute with the parties, he ( Oxley) challenged him to fight, and tried every means in his power to excite his temper for not joining the union. John Quick, foreman in Mr. Moore's employ, stated that his attention was called on hearing a noise out side the warehouse, and upon proceeding to ascertain the cause, he saw the three defendants, who, on ob serving him, exclaimed, " You are all a set of knobsticks for working here." They used other lan guage, of a tendency to induce the other workmen to st.tike and join the union. Oxley was extremely voci ferous on the occasion, and frequently said, in a loud tone, that rather than work knobsticking there he would suffer death. He also used other language of a threatening nature, challenging out to fight any of the men who dared to stand before him. In answer to Mr. TRAILL, the witness said, that the meaning of the word " knobstick" applied to all jour neymen hatters who did not belong to the union. Edward Windley, a journeyman hat-clipper, stated, that he saw Tummins, one of Mr. Moore's men, knocked down by the defendants, and he received such serious injury that it was found necessary to convey him to the hospital. Henry Power, dresser to Mr. Key, at Guy's Hospi tal, stated, that when Tummins was brought to the Hospital, on examination it was discovered that the small bone of his leg was broken near the ancle. The witness considered him in an unfit state to be brought to the office to appear against the defendants ; and al though no danger was to be apprehended from the in jury, yet it was likely that he would be confined a month at least. The defendants denied that they went to the pre mises for the purpose of intimidating any of Mr. Moore's men. Mr. TRT ALL— If you did not go there for that purpose, why use the word " knobstick," and other terms of a threatening nature, to the workmen on the premises? Rogers said that the foreman misconstrued the meaning of the word " knobstick," for instead of the term being applicable to those not belonging to the union, it was a term of reproach to those who did not serve their full time to the trade. Mr. Moore's foreman contradicted the assertion, and said that he had given the proper explanation of the term, as it was known to all in the trade. Mr. TRAILL (to the defendants)—What have you to say in answer to the charge of assault on the man Tum mins, now lying in the hospital, incapacitated to work, owing to your violence ? Rogers said that that person offered to fight him, in the first instance, and, in fact, foreman and all came out of the warehouse stripped, as if they were going to pitch into them. Mr. Hobler explained, that upon hearing the noise and confusion created by the defendants outside the warehouse, some of the men went to see the cause, and he admitted that they might be divested of some portion of their clothes, but everybody knew that jour neymen hatters worked without coat or waistcoat, al though the defendants sought to induce a belief that the men had stripped for the purpose of engaging with them. Such was not the case Mr. Hobler declared ; and in remarking upon the conduct of the defendants on the occasion, he explained the serious consequences that might have ensued, Mr. Moore having upwards of 200 men at work in his manufactory. He also inti mated that Mr. Moore had determined to proceed against the defendants to the utmost extremity of the law, for the cruel attack they had made upon one of his workmen out of revenge, no doubt, for not enter ing into the Society to which they belonged., The Magistrate sentenced Rogers and Oxley to six weeks' confinement at hard labour in Guildford House of Correction, and Reed to one month at Brix ton, for the first offence, and adjudged them to find bail to answer the charge of assault at the sessions. FECUNDITY. —The ewe belonging to Mr. John Thurlby, in Helpringham Fen; which, as was last year noticed, had yeaned 50 lambs in 20 years, has this season had another lamb, making 51 in 21 years ; her age is 23 years.—Boston Herald. The spirit of insubordination, which has long been prevalent in the greater part of this ill-fated barony (Ennishowen), continues to increase. Scarce a night now passes without leaving some tale of terror to be told. Threatening notices against the payment circulated ; and letters if " John Right " (the are quite common.— 3U 1 100.1.!(1 Of renti s bTalrftliitix!V Ar t — idely c demanding money for use of Captain Rock of fife:lo \ ds), Londonderry Sentinet\':::,‘ 1.-.1 y6l ta . ) 1 ,,,.. . ,_ , •:-. J .l. ~ i ' - ,-...: ... :14: t: : ::; A.'S' ......, ,---,,. - i - zv v y ,111,...... CHURCH RATES. LIST OFVT MAJORITY Of 237 (Teller included) who voted for Lord Althorpe's Motion, " That from and after a time to be fixed, the Payment of Church Rates shall cease and determine ; and that in lieu thereof his Majesty be empowered to grant out of the proceeds of the Lind Tax a sum not exceeding 250,0001., to be, applied to the Repairs of Parish Churches and Pa rochial Chapels." ENGLAND. Althorp, Visc.—South Nor thamptonshire Anson, Sir G.—Lichfield Ashley, Lord—Dorsetshire Astley, Sir J. D.—North Wilt shire Astley, SirJacob—Westlslorfolk Bankes, W. J.--.Dorsetshire Barham, J.—Kendal Baring, A.—North Essex Baring, F. T.—Portsmouth Baring, H. B.—Marlborough Barnett, C. J.—Maidstone Beaumont, T. \V.—South Nor thumberland Bell, M.—S. Northumberland Benett, J.—South Wiltshire Bentinck, Id. G.—King'sLynn Bethel], 12.—East Yorkshire Blackstone, W. S.—Wallingford Blunt, Sir Charles—Lewes W.—Bolton.le.Moors Brodie, W. B.—New Sarum Bruce, Lord E.—Marlborough Brudesell, Lord—North Nor thamptonshire Bulteel, J. C.—South Devon Burrell, Sir C.—Shoreham lurton, Henry—Beverley Byng, Sir John—Poole Calcraft, J. H.—Wareham Campbell, Sir H. P.—Berwick 7.arter, J. B.—Portsmouth Cartwright, W. R.—South Nor thamptonshire Cavendish, H. F. C.—Derby Chandos, Marquis of—Bucks Chapman, A.—Whitby Chaytor, Sir W.—Sunderland Chaytor, W. R. C.—Durham Chetwynd, Capt. W.—Stafford Childers, J. W —Cambridgesh. Clive, Edward B.—Hereford Clive, Viscount—Ludl , w Clive, R. H_—S. Shropshire Cooper, Hon. A.H.—Dorchester Crawford, W.—London Crawley, S.—Bedford Curteis, E. B.—Rye Curteis, H. B.—East Sussex Darlington, Earl of—South Shropshire - Duffield, T.—Abingdon Dugdale, W. S.—North War wickshire Duncombe, Hon. W.—North Yorkshire Durham, P. C. H.—Devizes Eastnor, Viscount—Reigate Ebrington, Visc.—North Devon Egerton, W. T —N. Cheshire Ellice, Edward—Coventry Edwards, J.—Montgomery Estcourt, 'l'. G. B.—Oxford Un. Etwall, 11.—Andover Fazakerley, J. N.—Peterboro' Ferguson, Sir R.—Nottingham Fielden, W. J.—Blackburn Finch, G.—Stamford Fitzroy, Lord J.—Thetford Fleetwood. P. H.—Preston Foley, J. H. H.—Droitwich Foley, E T.—Herefordshire Forester, G. C. W.—Wenloek Forster, C. S.—Walsall Fort, J.—Clitheroe Fox, Sackville L—Helleston Fox, Lieut.-CoL—Tavistock Fremantle, Sir T.—Buckingham Gaskell, J. M.—Wenlock Gladstone, W. E.—Newark Gordon, R.—Cricklade Goulburn, H.—Cambridge Uni- Mosley, Sir o.—North Stafford. shire Neale, Sir H. B.—Lymington Nicholl, J —Cardiff Norreys, Lord—Oxfordshire North, F.—Hastings Paget, F.—Beaumaris Palmer, C. F.—Reading Palmer, R.--Bcrksnire Patten, J. W.—Ninth Lancash. Pechell, Sir S. J. B.—Windsor Peel, hir R.—Tamworth Pendarves, E. W. W.—West Cornwall Pepys, C. C.—Malton Peter, W.—Bodmin Phillipps, C. M.—North Leices. terehire Phillpotts, J.—Gloucester Pigot, R.—Bridgenorth Pollock, F.—Huntingdon Price, R.—New Radnor Ramsden, J. C.—Mallow Reid, Sir J. R.—Dover Rick ford, W.—Aylesbury Rider, T.—West Kent Ridley, Sir M. W.—Newcastle Rolfe, R. M.—Penrhyn Koss, C.—Northampton Russell, Lord John —South De- vonsliire Russell, C.—Reading Ryle, John—Macclesfield Sanderson, R.—Colchester Sandon, Lord—Liverpool Sanford, E. A.—,West Somer. setshiie Scarlett, Sir J.—Norwich Scott, J.W.—North Hampshire Scott, Sir E. D.—Lichfield Scrope, Ponlette—Stroud Sheppard, T.—Frome Simeon, Sir R.—lsle of Wight Skipwith, Sir G.—Warwicksh. Slaney, IL A.—Shrewsbury Smith, J.—Buckinghamshire Smith, R. V.—Northampton Somerset, Lord G. C.—Mon- tnouth;hire Spankie, Mr. Serg.—Finsbury Spencer, Capt F.—Midhurst Stanley, Hon. E. G. S.—North \ Lancashire Stanley, E.—Webt Cumberland Stanley, E. J.—Nor t h Cheshire Strickland, G.—W Yorkshire Tayleure, Wm.—Bridgewater Taylor, Right Hon. M. A.— Sudbury Thomson, Hon. C. P.—Man- chester Throckmorton, IL G.—Becks Tower, C. T.—Harwich Troubridge, Sir E.T.—Sandwich Tyrrell, Sir J. T.—North Essex Verney, Sir H.—Buckingham Vernon, Hon. G. J. V.—South Derbyshire Vivian, Sir H.—Tiuro Vyvyan, Sir It. R.—Bristol Wall, C. B.—Guildford Walsh, Sir J. B.—Sudbury Ward, H. G.—St. Albans Warrc, A. J.—Hastings Waterpark, Lord—South Der byshire Watkins, J. L. V.—Brecon Watson, R.—Canterbury Wedgewood, J.—Stoke Weyland, R.—Oxfordshire Whitbread, W. H.—Bedtord Wilbraham,G.—South Cheshire Williams, T. P.—Marlow Willoughby, Sir H. P.—New. versity Graham, Sir J. B. —Cumberland Greene, T.—Lancashire Grey, C.—Chipping-Wycombe Grey, Sir George—Devonport Grimston, Visc.—H ertfordsh i re Gronow, Capt.—Staffbrd ! Guise Sir B. W.—East Glouces castle - - Wood, G. W.—Lancashire Wood, Colonel T.—Brecknock. . . shire Wrottesley, Sir J.—South Star. fordshiri . Wynn, Right Hon. C. W. W.— Montgomeryshire tershire Holcomb, J.—Dover Halford, Henry—South Leices.l tershire Handley, Wm. F.—Newark. upon-Trent Hanmer, Sir J.—Shrewsbury Hanmer, H.—Aylesbury Hardinge, Right Hon. Sir H.— Launceston Hardy, John—Bradford Hawes, B.—Lambeth Hawkes, T.— Dudley Heathcoat, J.—Tiverton Henniker, Lord—East Suffolk Herbert, Hon. S.—south Wilts Hodges, T. L.—West tient Hope, H. T.—Gloucester Horne, Sir W.-- Marylebone Houldsworth, T.—North Not- SCOTLAND. Adam, C.—Clackmannansliire Agnew, Sir A.—Wigtonshire Rannerman, A.—Aberdeen Bruce, C. L. C.—lnverness,&c. Callender, J. H.—Argyleshire Elliot, Hon. C pt.—Roxburgh- shire Ferguson, G.—Banffshire Grant, ('.—lnverness-shire Hay, A. L,—Elgin, &c. Hay, Sir J.—Peebles-shire Jeffrey, Right Hon. F.—Edin. burgh Johnston, A.—St. Andrews Locn, James—Wick, &c. Mackenzie, J. A. S. -Hess-shire Murray, J. A.—Leith, &c. Rae, Sir W.—Bute Sinclair, G.—Caithness-shire Stewart, E.—Wigton, &c. Stewart, Sir M. S.—Renfrew shire Werayss, J.—Fifeshire tmgharnshire Howick, Vi , c.—North North. umberland Hughes, Hughes—Oxford Irton, S.—West Cumberland Inglis, Sir It. H.—Oxford Uni versity Jermyn, Earl—Bury, Suffolk Jerningham ' H. V.—Pontefract Johnstone, Sir J. V.—Scarbo- rough Joßifle, Colonel—Petersfield Keppel, Hon. G.—East Norfolk Kerrison, Sir K—Eye King, E. B.— Warwick Labouchere, Henry—Taunton Langston, J. H —Oxford Lefevre, C. S.—North Hants Lemon, Sir C.—West Cornwall Lennox, LordG.—West Sussex Lewis, T. F.—Radnorshire Lincoln, Earl of—South Notts Littleton, E. J.—South Staf fordshire Lopez, Sir R. F.—Westbury Lowther, Viscoun t—Westmore. land Lumley, Viscount—North Not. tinghamshire Lushington, Dr.—Tower Haml. Lyall, G.—London Lygon, Hon. Col. H. B.—West' Wor estershire Moberly, W. L—Chatham Manners, Lord R.—North Lei . . cestershire Marjoribanks, S.—Hy the Marsland, Thomas—Stockport Methuen, P.—North Wilts Milton, Viscount—North Nor thamptonshire Morpetli, Lord—W. Yorkshfre Miles, W.—East Somersrt •41 • The MINORITY appears LIST OF MEM. ENGLAND. Adams, E. H.—Carmarthensh. Andover, Visc.—Malmesbury Anson, Hon. G.—Gt.Yarmouth Apsley, Lord—Cirencester At herley, A.—Southampton Attwood, M.—Whitehaven Attwood,T.—Birmingham Baillie, J. E.—Bristol Baring, F.—Thetford Baring, W. B.—Winchester Beauclerk, Aubrey Wm.—East Surrey Berkeley, G. C. F.—West Glou cestershire Berkeley, C. F —Cheltenham Biddulph, R. M.—Denbighshire Blackburne, J.—Huddersfield Blake, Sir F.—Berwick Blandtord, Marquis of—Wood. stock Boss, J. G.—r orthallerton Brougham, W. --Southwark Bulkeley, Sir 11.W.—Anglesea Buller, James W.—Exeter Buller, Edward—North Staf fordshire Buller, Charles—Liskeard Bulwer, H. L.—Coventry I Burdett, Sir F.—Westminster Buxton, T. F.—Weymouth Byng, Geo.—Middlesex Bouverie, D. P.—Salisbury Calley, T.—Cricklade .!alvert, N.—Hertfordshire Cavendish, C. C.—East Sussex Cavendish, Lord—North Der byshire Chaplin, T.--Stamford Clayton, Colonel—Marlow Cobbett, William—Oldham Cockerell,Sir C.—Evesham Codrington, Sir E.—Devonport Collier, J.—Plymouth Cookes, T. H.—East Worces tershire Cotes, J.—North Shropshire Cripps Joseph—Cirencester Crompton, J. S.—Ripon Crompton, S.—Thirnk Dare, R. W. H.—South Essex Davenport, John—Stoke-upon. Trent Dawson, A. E.—South Leices tershire Denison, W. J.—West Surrey Denison, J. E.—South Notting. hamahire Dick, Quintin—Maldon Dillwyn, L W.—Glamorgansh. Donkin, Sir R. S.—Berwick Duncannon,Visc.—Nottingham Dundas, Capt.—Greenwich Dundas, Sir R. L.—Richmond Dundas, J. C.—Richmond Dundas, Hon. T.—York Dykes, F. L. B.—Cockermoutb Evans, Wm.—Leicester Fancourt, Major—Barnstaple Fellowes, H. A. \V.—Andover Fitzroy, Lord C—Bury St. Ed. Folkes, Sir W.—Norfolk Fordwich, Lord—Canterbury Glynne, Sir S. R.--Flint Grant, lit. Hon. R.—Finsbury Grosvenor, Earl—Cheshire Grosvenor, Lord R.—Chester Halse, James—St. Ives Handley, Henry—Lincolnshire Harcourt, G. G.—Oxfordshire Harland, W. C.—Durham Heathcote, Sir G.—Rutlandsh. Heathcote, G. J.—Lincomshire Heneage, G. F.—Lincoln Heron, Sir R.—Peterborough Berries, J. C.—Harwich Hill, Sir R.—North Shropshire Hornby, E. G.--Warrington IRELAND. Bateson, Sir R.—Londonderry Belfast, Earl of—Antrim Co. Browne, D.—Mayo Carew, R. S.—Wexford County Castlereagh, Visc.—Down Christmas, W.—Waterford Cole, Lord—Fermanagh Conolly, E. M.—Donegal Coote, Sir C.—Queen's Co. Corry, Hon. H. L —Tyrone Co. Daly, James—Galway Co. Dobbin, L.—Armagh Forbes, Viscount—Longford Hayes, Sir E.—Donegal Hill, Lord M. —N ewry Howard, IL—Wicklow Co. Lefroy, Dr.—Dublin University Macnamara, W.—Clare Co. Macnamara, F.—Eunis Martin, J.—Sligo Max well,H.—Cavan Mullins, F. W.—Kerry O'Callaghan, C.—Tipperary O'Reilly, W.—Dundalk Perceval, Colonel—Co. Sligo Perrin, Louis—Monaghan Stawell, Colonel—Kinsale Talbot, J.—Athlone Tennant, J E.—Belfast White, S.—Leitrim Co. TELLER. Wood, C.—Halifax PAIRED OFF IN FAVOUR. Rice, Right Hon. T. S.—Cam. bridge Tancred, H. W.—Banbury xl in The Sun of the f.).2d inst. 9ERS ABSENT. Hoskins, K.—Herefordshire Hothain, Lord—Leominster Howard, P. H.—Carlisle Howard, F. G.—Morpelh liumphery, John—Southwark Ingilby, Sir W. A.—Parts of Lindsey, Lincolnshire Johnstone, Sir F.—Weymouth Kerry, Earl of—Caine Knatchbull, Sir E.—East Kent Lamont, Norman—Wells Langton, Wm. Gore—East So.. mersetshire Lee, J. L—Wells Leonard, T. B.—Malden Leonard, S.r T.—South Essex Lennox, Lord W.—King's Lynn Lennox, Lord A.—Chichester Lester, B. Lester—Poole Lowther, Vise.—Westmoreland Madocks, J.—Denbigh Mandeville, Visc.—Hunting. donshire Mangles, J.—Guildford Marryatt, J.--Sandwich . Marshall, J.—Leeds Maxfield, Captain—Grimsby Mildmay, P. St. John—Win chester Miller, Wm. H.—Newcastle under-Lyme Mills, J.—Rochester Molyneux, Lord—S. Lancashire Moreton, Hon. H.—Gloucester Moreton, 11. G. F.—East Glou cestershire Morrison, J.—lpswich Mostyn, Hon. E.—Fliutshirc Neeld, J.—Chippen ham Newark, Visc.—East Retford Noel, Sir G. N.—Rutland Oasulston, Lord—N. Northum. berland Owen, H.—Pembroke Owen, Sir J. B.—Pembrokesh. Paget, Sir C.—Carnarvon Palmer, General—Bath Palmerstone, Viscount—South Hampshire Parker, Sir H.—West Suflblk Parker, J.—Shetlield Peel, Col. J.—Huntingdon Pelham, Hon. C. E. W.—Lin colnshire, parts of Lindsey Penleaze, C.—Southampton Penruddockc, J. H.—Wilton Petre, Hon. E. R.—York Phillips ' Sir IL—Haverfordwest Philips, Sir G.—South Warwick- shiie Plumptre, J. P.—East Kent IPo . usonby, Hon. W. F. S.— Dorset - Shire Poulter, J. S.—Shaftesbury Powell, Colonel—Cardiganshire Poyntz, W. S.--Ashburton Price, Sir R.—Herefordshire Pryse, P.—Cardigan Ramsbottom, J.—Windsor Robarts, A. W.—Maidstone Roebuck, J. A.—Bath It ooper, J. B. —Hun tingdonsl ire Rotch, B.—Knaresborough Rumbold, C. Ed.—Yarmouth . Russell, Lord—Tavistock Sebright, Sir J. S.—Hertfordsh Seymour, Lord E—Totness Shawe, R. N.—East Suffolk Smith, J. A.—Chichester Smith, T. A.—Carnarvonshire Spry, S. T.—Bodmin Stanley, Henry—Preston Stewart, John—Lymington Stewart, P. M —Lancaster Stormont, Viscount—Norwich Stuart, Lord D. C.--Arundel Stuart, W.—Bedfordshire Surrey, Earl of—West Sussex Talbot, C. R. M.—Glamorgan S ire TalNt, H. F.—Chippenham Talmash, Hon. A.—Grantham Tapps, G. W.—Christchurch Thicknesse, It.—Wigan Thompson, P. B.—East York shire Townley, R. G.—Cambridgesh. Townshend, Ld. C.—Tamworth Tracy, C. H.—Tewkesbury Trevor, Hon. G. R.—Caermar. thenshire Tullamore, Lord—Penryn Tynte, C. K. K.—Bridgwater Tyrell, C.—West Suffblk _ . Vaughan, Sir R.— Merion ethsh Villiers, Viscount—Honiton Walker, 11.—Bury, Lancashire Welby, G. E.—Grantham Whitmore, T. C.—Bridgenorth Williams, R.—Thrcheiter Williams, W. A.—Monmouth- shire Wilmot, Sir E. E.—North War- wickshire Windham, W. IL—E. Norfolk Winnington, H. J —W. Wor. cestershire Wynn, Sir W. NV —Denbigh. shire SCOTLAND. Abercromby, Right Hon. J.— Edinburgh Arbuthnot, General—Kincar. dineshire Balfour, J.—Haddingtonshire Colquhoun, J. C.—Dumbanon .. shire Dalrymple, Sir J. H.—Edin burghshire Ferguson, R.—Dysart, &c. Fleming, Admiral—Stirlingsh. Gordon, Ca r t. W.—Aberdeen. shire' Grant, F. W.—Elginshire and Nairnshire Hallyburton, D G.—Forfarsh. dope, Hon. Sir A.—Linlith, gowshire IJohnstone, J. J. H Dumfries- shire Macleod, R.--Sutherlandshire Maxwell, John—l anprkshire Oswald, James—Glasgow Parnell, Sir H.—Dundee Pringle, R.—Selkirkshire Ross, H.—Montrose, &c. Sandford, Sir D. K. —Paisley Steuart, R.—Haddington, &c. Trail, G.—Orkney, &c. ' IRELAND. Acheson,Lord—Co. of Arm gh Arehdall, Gen. M. —Fermanagh Barn, G. S.—Cork Co. Bernard, Hon. W. S.—Bandon Browne, J.—Mayo Callaghan, D.—Cork City Chichester, Lord A.—Belfast Clements, Visc.—Leitrim Co. Cole, Hon. Arthur—Enniskillen Cooper, E. J.—Sligo Co. Copeland, Ald.—Coleraine Ferguson, Sir R—Londonderry Fitzgibbon, R.—Limerick Co. Gladstone, T.—Portarlington Grattan, J.—Co. of Wicklow Grattan, Henry—Meath Hill, Lord Arthur—Down Co. Jephson, D. o.—Mallow Jones, T. —Londonderry Co Keane, Sir R.—Waterford Co. Knox, Col.—Dungannon Lalor, Patrick—Queen's Co. Lambert, H.—Wexford Co. Lynch, A. H.—Galway Martin, T.—Galway Co. Maxwell, J. W.—Downpatrick Meynell, Capt. H.—Lisburne O'Connell, Daniel—Dublin O'Connell, Maurice—Tralee O'Connor, Don—Roscom. Co. O'Grady, S.—Limerick Co. O'Neill, Hn. Gen.—Antrim Co. Oxmantown, Lord—King's Co. Shaw, F.—Dublin University Stewart, Sir H.—Tyrone Verner, Colonel—Armagh Co. Young, J.—Cavan JEWISH CIVIL DISABILITIES BILL. LIST OF THJ Of 55 (Tellers included) wh , Grant's Motion for the R abilities. E MAJORITY to voted in favour of Mr. R. temoval of Jewish Civil Dis- Stewart, P. M.—Lancashire I l'epnyson ! Right Hon. C.— - - Lambeth Tooke, W.—Truro Warburton,. H.--:Bridp9rt 'Wason, Rigby—lpswich Wend, G. W.—S. Lancashire Young, G. F.—Tynemouth SCOTLAND. Dunlop, J.—Kilmarnock, &c. Jeffery, Rt. Hon.F.—Edinburgh Macleod, R.,—Sutherlandshire Murray, J. A.—Leith Stewart, Sir M. S.—Renfrewsh. Wallace, Robert—Greenock IRELAND. Blake, M. J.—Galway Co. Evans, G.—Dublin Co. L.ilor, Patrick—Queen's Co. Mullins, F. W.—Kerry Co. O'Connell, Maurice—Tra lee 0 Connell, Morgan—Meath Ruthven, E. S.—Dublin Ruthven, Edward—Kildare Talbot, J. H.—New Ross Vigors, N. C.—Carlow TELLERS. Grant, Right Hon. R.—Finsbury Wood, C.—Halifax ENGLAND. Aghonby, A.—Cockermouth Attwood, Thos.—Birmingham Baring, F.—Thetford Buckingham, J. S.—Sheffield Buller, J. W.—Exeter Brother ton, Joseph—Safford Bish, T. omas—Leominster Cayley, Sir G.—Scarborough Cayley, E. S.—N. Yorkshire Chichester, J. P. B.—Barnstaple Dillwyn, L. W.—tilamorgansh. Gordon, Robert —Cricklade Gisborne, T.—North Derbysh. Howard, P. H.—Carlisle Heathcote, J.—Tiverton Hume, J.—Middlesex Langdale, Hon. C.—Beverley Lyall, G.—London Marryatt, Joseph—Sandwich Molyneux, Lord—South Lanca. . . shire Parker, John—Sheffield Parrott, J.—Tot n ess Pease, Joseph—South Durham Pelham,'Hon. C.—Lincolnshire Peter, W.—Bodmin Philips, Mark—Manchester Ponsonby, Hon. W.—Dorset shire Rolfe R M —Penrhyn Stanley, E. J.—Nortli Cheshirei HIS MAJESTY'S LEVEE. Their Majesties arrived at the Palace at St. James's about half-past one o'clock yesterday afternoon from Windsor Castle. Soon after his arrival the King held a Court and Levee. A Petition from the . Dissenting Ministers of the three denominations in favour of the grant of a Charter to the London University was presented to his Majesty in the Royal Closet. The Petition w•as referred to a .Com mittee of the Lords of his Majesty's Most Honourable Privy Council. M. Tricoupi, the Grecian Minister, had an audience of the King to deliver a letter from his Sovereign. His Ex cellency was introduced by Viscount Palmerston, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, and conducted by Sir Robert Chester, the Master of the Ceremonies. In the circle the following presentations to his Majesty took place, viz: Count de Limburg Stirum, from the Netherlands, by the Chevalier W. G. Dedel, the Netherlands Minister. The Chevalier de Jabat, Secretary of Legation, and the Chevaliers Sandoval and Burgos, Attaches to the Spanish Legation, by the Marquis de Miraflores, Count de Florida Blanca, the Spanish Minister. At the Entrée Levee the Earl of .Mu'grave kissed hands on his return from the Government of Jamaica; his Lord ship was presented by Mr. Secretary Stanley. And Sir W. Betham, Ulster King of Arms, kissed hands on his re turn from Ireland. The King held a privy council, which was attended by the Lord President, the Lord Privy Seal, the First Lord of the Treasury • the Secretaries of State for the Home, Fo reign, and Colonial Departments ; the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Earl of Carlisle, the First Lord of the Admiralty, the Postmaster-General, the Paymaster of the Forces, and the four great Officers of State. The Hon. W. Bathurst was the Clerk of the Council in Waiting. His Majesty gave audiences to the Marquis of. Winches ter, Earl Grey, Viscount Melbourne, the Duke of Rich mond, the Earl of Ripon, the Marquis of Lansdowne, Mr. Secretary Stanley, the Duke of Devonshire, Lord J. Rus sell, Viscount Althorp, the Marquis of Clanricarde, Vis count Palmerston, and Lord Hill. Lord A. Fitzclarence and Sir J. Whatley were the Lord and Groom in Waiting. At the Entree Levee there were present — The Russian, Austrian, and French Ambassadors ; the Sardinian, Neapolitan, Prussian, Swedish, Wirtemberg, Belgic, Netherlands, Danish, Bavarian, Portuguese, Bra zilian, Grecian, Spanish, and Saxon Ministers ; the Ha noverian Charge d'Affaires, the Bishop of Winchester, the Lord Chamberlain, the Lord Steward, the Groom of the Stole, the Master of the Horse, the Captain of the Honour able Corps of Gentlemen at Arms ; Lord Hill, Gold Stick in Waiting ; the Right Hon. T. S. Rice, Joint Secretary to the Treasury ; the Treasurer of the Household, the Master of the Ceremonies, the Marquis of Thomond ; Co lonel Wynyard, Colonel Gibbs, and Colonel Arnold (Royal Engineers), Aides-de-Camp to the King ; Major-General Macdonell, Principal Equerry to the Queen ; the Master of the Robes, the Clerk Marshal, the Captain of the Yeomen Guard ; olonel Bowater, Equerry ' • Colonel Richardson (Royal Horse Guards), Silver Stick in Waiting ; Master Graves, Page of Honour. Amongst the general company were— DLI IC Es— Gordon , Roxborough, Norfolk, Beaufort, Leinster. MaaQutsEs—Camden, Queensberry, Chandos, Wor cester. EARts--Mulgrave, Tankerville, Brownlow, Wilton, Galloway, Leitrim, Lisburne. ViscouxTs—St. Vincent, Ingestre, Strangford. Loans—Boston, Templemore, Lovaine, Eastnor, Redes dale, Plunket. Archbishop of Armagh. 131m-fors—Chester, Lincoln, Bangor, Meath. Right Hon. W. Sturges Bourne. HosoußAßLEs—Montague Bertie, Rev. C. Cust, Rev. Neville Grenville, William Cust, Augustus Moreton. Sias—Duncan Campbell, John Woolmore, Charles Douglas, John Wrottesley, F. Ommanney. REv. MEssas—David Markham, B. Mardon, P. W. Pegus, Richard Keats. MEssas.—Basil Montagu, Harcourt, Watts Russell, Wilkie, R. A., Sackville Lane Fox, H. Fleetwood, M.P., Tisdall, Gordon, F. Winn Knight, Urquhart, Farquhar son, Inns, Ross, Holyoake Goodricke, Vincent, Carew, M.P., Henry Pierrepont, Guest, M.P. GENERALS—Hon. Sir A. Hope, Millar, Balfour, Sir A. Wallace, Bligh, Lord Harris, Sir James Bathurst, Earl of Cavan, Sir T. Molyneux, Sir William Anson, Hall, Lord E. Somerset, Sir Wm. K. Grant. CAPTAINS (R.N. )—Waldegrave, M'Kerlie, Ferguson, David Scott, Sir John Hill, Meynell, W. Keats, Charles Weller (Trinity House). COLONELS—Somerset, Sir Charles Thornton, Tynte, M.P., O'Reilly, Sir G. Whitmore, Clitheroe, Paterson, J. E. Jones, Sir A. Dalrymple, Loftus, Gooch, Jones, Knollys. COMMANDERS (R.N. )—Howard, IL Griffith, De Ros. MAJORS—Dundas, K. Tynte, M.P. LIEUTENANT (R.N.)—Thomas Leigh. CAPTAINS—HOD. C. Phipps, Hill. LIEUTENANTS—Pitt, D. Browne, Mitchell, Josiah Wil kinson, Hon. It.Lambart, Oliver, Aill. Cornet Tomkinson. ENsioris—J. Wm. Crowdy, A. Nowell Sherson. The following were presented to his Majesty : The Hon. Montague Bertie, on his promotion and ex change into the Grenadier Guards, by Earl Brownlow. Sir Duncan Campbell, on being created a baronet, by the Duke of Argyll. Captain C. Weller, of the Trinity House, by Sir J. Wool more. Mr. Harcourt, High Sheriff of Bucks, by the Marquis of Chandos. Mr. F. W. Knight, on going abroad, by his father, Mr. J. Knight. Duke of Roxburgh, by the Lord Chamberlain. Lieut. Josiah Wilkinson, 44th regiment Madras Army, by the Bishop of Lincoln. Commander Howard, by the Earl of Carlisle. Mr. F. Innes, by the Duke of Gordon. Earl of Galloway, on succeeding to the title and on his marriage, by Sir James Graham. Earl of Leitrim, on being made a Knight of St. Patrick, by Earl Grey. Earl of Lisburne, by Colonel Horace Seymour. Mr. Holyoake Goodricke, High Sheriff for the county of Warwick, by the Marquis of Queensberry. Lieutenant T. Leigh, R.N., by the Right Hon. Lord Suffield. Viscount Ingestre, R.N., by Sir J. Graham. The Hon. and Rev. Neville Grenville, on being appointed a Chaplain in Ordinary to his Majesty, by the - Duke of Devonshire. Mr. Urquhart (of Craigston Castle), upon going abroad, by the Duke of Gordon. Mr. Vincent, by Sr W. Fremantle. Rev. Richard Keats, A. 8., on his presentation by his Ma jesty to the Living of Northfleet, by Lord Auckland. Major-General Millar on his promotion to a battalion of Artillery. Mr. Guest, M.P., on his marriage, by the Earl of Abingdon. Lieut.-Colonel Knollys, by Sir H. Taylor. Captain M'Kerlie, R.N. on his appointment to his Ma jesty's ship President, by Sir James Graham. Captain David Scott, R.N., by the Duke of Gordon. Lieut.-Colonel Paterson, on his return from Jamaica, by the Master-General of the Ordnance. Lieut.-Colonel Loftus, on promotion by Sir J. Woodford. Major Dundas, Royal Artillery, on his appointment as As sistant Inspector of Artillery. Commander R. Griffith by Sir T. Hardy. Captain and Lieut. the Hon. C. Phipps, Scots Fusileer Guards, on his return from Jamaica, by the Earl of Mulgrave. Lieut. Mitchell, on his appointment, by the Duke of Beaufort. Lieut. D. Browne, on going to join his regiment, by Ge neral Grey. Ensign J. W. Crowdy, on his appointment, by Mr. R. Gordon, M. P. Lieut. Hill, by his father, Sir John Hill. Ensign A. N. Sherson, on his appointment, by General Lord Hill. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS, April 30. The Earl of DEL AWARE presented a petition from certain inhabitants and under-graduates of Cambridge, against the admission of dissenters to degrees in the univer sity. They also complained of the practice, that was allowed by the church, of dissenters burying their dead in the church yards. The noble earl stated that in his opinion the granting of the prayer of the dissenters would be entirely subversive of the religion of the country as practised at the universities. . The Bishop of WINCHESTER presented several peti tions against the new Beer Act. The Bishop of LONDON presented several petitions for the better observance of the Sabbath. REPEAL OF THE UNION. Mr. SPRING RICE and others brought up a report from the Commons, desiring a conference with their lord ships, " upon a matter connected with the stability of the country, the peace of the empire, and the welfare of all classes of his Majesty's subjects." The question was then put, and the messengers called in and acquainted that their lordships had agreed to the conference. . . Lord TEYNHAM was about presenting several peti tions praying for a repeal of the union, when he was inter rupted by the Usher of the Black Rod, who appeared at the bar and informed their lordships that the Commons were ready for the conference. The following managers were then appointed on the the part of the Lords to confer with the managers on the part of the Commons in the painted chamber :--The Mar quis of Lansdowne, the Archbishop of Cashel, the Duke of Wellington, the Earl of Winchilsea, Lord Charlemont, Earl Grey, and the Marquis of Conyngham. Their lord ships thentproceeded to the conference, and on their return the Marquis of Lansdowne stated that the managers had had the conference nd had received a communication of an address which had been agreed to by the Commons, to which they desired the concurrence of this house. The address was as follows : " We, your Majesty's most dutiful and loyal subjects, the Commons, in Parliament assembled, feel it our duty humbly to approach your Majesty's throne, to record in the most solemn manner our fixed determination to main tain unimpaired and undisturbed the legislative union be tween Great Britain and Ireland, which we consider to be essential to the strength and stability of the empire, to the continuance of the connection between the two countries, and to the peace and security and happiness of all classes of your Majesty's subjects. " We feel this our determination to be as much justified by our views of the general interests of the state, as by our conviction that to no other portion of your Majesty's subjects is the maintenance of the legislative union more important than to the inhabitants of Ireland themselves. We humbly represent to your Majesty, that the im perial parliament have taken the affairs of Ireland into their most serious consideration, and that various salutary laws have been enacted since the union, for the advance ment of the interests of Ireland, and of the empire at large. " In expressing to your Majesty our resolution to main tain the legislative union inviolate, we humbly beg leave to assure your Majesty, that we shall persevere in apply ing our best attention to the removal of all just causes of complaint, and to the promotion of all well-considered measures of improvement." Lord TEYNHAM then presented the petition in which he had been previously interrupted. The Archbishop of YORK presented several petitions for the better observance of the Sabbath. The Duke of NEWCASTLE stated that on a former occasion he had mentioned a music meeting which was about to be held inWestminsterAbbey. He begged then to give notice that on Friday next he would bring forward a motion on the subject, with a view to prevent what he be lieved would be a desecration of that sacred building. Lord WHARNCLIFFE then presented some petitions against the Beer Bill. Earl GREY then rose and said—My Lords, in rising to propose communicated ropose that you t us o h u o s u , l i d n t t a o k y e ou th r e im a m ddr ed e i s a s te , whiehhasjust been consideration, I feel it due to make a few observations in justification of that course. My lords, it has not been unusual in cases of great and urgent importance to adopt that course; and what case, my lords, could be of greater or of more urgent importance than one which involved the repeal of the union with Ireland—in other words involving a question, not merely of the prosperity and power, but of the peace and wellbeing of the kingdom. (Cheers. ) Great, however, as is the question, and urgent as are the motives which urge me to ask for such a speedy decision upon the subject, still I would certainly not have pressed for it without affording time for a further consider ation of the matter, if I did not think, that upon this question, which has already been for so long a time before the country—the evils of which have been perceived by almost all classes, which has occupied the House of Commons five days in de bating it, when everything was brought forward in its support, but which has been passed by a majority such as, perhaps, VMS never seen before—had I not felt confident that upon such a question your lordships would be una nimous in opinion, I repeat, that I would not have pressed it forward without giving time for mature con sideration. (Cheers.) I have stated that this is a question which, in my opinion, involves the peace, and safety, and inte grity of the British empire. If your lordships look at what has happened of late years—if you consider the principles on which the question has been agitated, the views which the friends of it have put forth, and the results which they had stated they intended to produce by it—who can believe, looking at these things, but that the same evil spirits which have created it will continue to in crease in power, and succeed in establishing a power which will be most detrimental to the best interests of the empire--not so much, perhaps, of this part of the empire as of that which is more imme diately concerned in the question—lreland itself—by pro ducing such a mass of confusion and ruin as will annihilate the country itself? (Loud and continued cheering. ) My lords, I feel strongly upon this question, and many as are the points and the proofs which I could bring forward in support of the motion, yet the question being one unfor tunately so familiar to your lordships—one on which no new light can be thrown, I shall not deem it neces sary to occupy any large space of your lordships' time. For c an it be said to be necessary to prove by details that, con nected as these two great branches of the empire are by the legislative union, a dissolution of that union—not only between the government but also between the people— that that separation must of necessity produce the separa tion of all those ties by which the two countries were bound together, and would produce such a state of things as after a deluge of blood, would not only end to the great injury of the two countries, but more especially of that part of the United Kingdom, Ireland ? (Hear.) My lords, I think it only necessary to make these general observations upon a questioncon e ur ren o c n o wh o i I fch your t h i n lordships. I m o rd sh i ay ps . anticipateH eaHear, the h unanimous ear. )The term forcible ina t i argu ments; u to - men a dd r ess which has been sent up from the other house ts s . ta i ttes first the stateswhol e the question o necessityin thfe our most o d s e t su pport the legislative union between the two countries ; it staYes what I have already endeavoured to state to your lordships, the necessity of preserving that connexion for the security of both countries, and it also states the benefits which Ireland has received from that union. It is not ne cessary for me to state, that the people of Ireland have been told that nothing but misery has been produced by that union, and that they have derived no advantage from it ; while the very contrary, in fact, has been produced. Let your lordships examine the details of this question, so far as relates to the commerce and manufactures of Ire land, in spite of the agitation which has prevailed in that country, and then put your hands on your hearts, and sa y conscientiously , whether the situation of Ireland has not been materially advanced and improved by the union. My lords, I lament those impediments that are thrown in the way of its commerce, and I look with horror at that extending misery, and likewise at that in creasing danger to the government of the country which must be the consequence of a continuance of that excitement, which we are called upon by every motive of conscience and duty, by the first principle of self preservation, by a regard for the interests o f Ireland, and by a so l emn d uty t o suppor t the imperial Crown o f t hi s realm, we are calle d upon to use our utmost efforts to put down. My lords, that spirit o f insubordination and violence which has been for some time so wickedly, for I cannot use any other term—that has been so wickedly e xc it e d (Cheers) must be put down ; there can be no compromise (Cheers); it must be put down by a strong arm, or else the Government and the prosperity of both countries will be entirely destroyed. I trust, therefore, my lords, that your lordships will concur in the address, which meets the pledge you have already given to the crown, of your determination to support it, and resisting that spirit which has already worked so many evils, and which will produce more if not effectually prevented. My lords, acting in the spirit of that determination, I will pledge his 'Majesty's government to use the power vested in them, fearlessly and resolutely to support the interests of both countries, and more especially the interests of that deluded people, whom the endeavours that are made to ex cite, if they should prove successful, will inevitably ruin. (Cries of " Hear, hear.") My lords, I do not know that it is worth while for me to enter at present into a charge that has been made against me, as if I were doing something most unjust in supporting strenuously as I now do, considering it to be a vital question, the conti nuance and maintenance of the legislative Union of the two countries, having been one of those who, at the time that legislative union was proposed, had given it their opposition. (Rear, hear, hear.) My lords, I did so, and I did so, I trust, conscientiously. I did so at a time when I was acting almost alone in the House of Commons, for it was during the time that Mr. Fox did not attend there. The feeling that I had on the subject was strong, and the opposition I gave to the measure was such as my feeble powers would permit ; but does it follow as a consequence that after the existence of that union for more than a quarter of a century? (Hear, hear, hear), after it has so closely and strongly linked the two countries together_ after it has become part of the system of the government, the undoing and destruction of which must be attended with most calamitous consequences—is it, I say, incumbent on me, as a matter of consistency, in such an altered state of things, to allow of that being undone, the undoing of which would prove the destruction of the country? ( Cheers. ) My lords, it is a received axiom in law upon many occa sions, Fieri timiat, sed factum valet ; and I might shelter myself under that principle, and say that I would resist the repeal, but looking back at the cir cumstances of the times, and recollecting the feeling by which the parties were actuated who proposed the union, and looking also at what has passed since, and above all seeing the manner in which the union has operated to the advantage of Ireland, I must say that I think I was mistaken in the course I then took. ( Hear, hear.) I do not think, • my lords, that it is any departure from consistency to maintain an opinion at the present moment upon such a subject different from that which I entertained some time since. ( Hear, hear.) What ever imputations it may . bring upon me when I see reason to change the opinions which I formerly en tertained upon any great subject, I shall not fail to avow it. My lords, I have vindicated my conduct upon this subject in other instances, and I shall be prepared to vindicate it in the present whenever the imputation shall be made against me. (Hear, hear.) Under the present circumstances, . my lords, I feel myself bound to support the determination so ably and properly expressed in the ad dress sent up to this house from the House of Commons in which I trust your lordships will concur nemine dissente. (Hear, hear.) The legislature, my lords, has already passed many laws with a view to the advantage and improvement of Ireland, and the address states that it will continue to persevere in those remedial mea sures, the object of which will be to remove all causes of complaint. ( Hear, hear.) My lords, I dwell upon this more particularly in consequence of what fell from a noble baron on the cross bench. I was glad to hear him say that he was not one who would support a repeal of the legislative union. He, however, threw out insinuations, if not posi tive assertions, that hitherto the Irish people had been ne glected and ill-used. My lords, I deny that statement, in toto. ( Cheers.) I say, my lords, that much has been' done, and that much remains to be done for the good of Ireland, and that parliament is engaged in a course of measures for that purpose. No man, my lords, is more sincerely desirous than I am to persevere in that good work for the support of peace and goodwill in Ireland, on which all the interests of that country depend, and which, if put an end to, will be attended with absolute ruin to that unhappy country. ( Cheers.) My lords, having thus generally stated my view of this subject, and the object of the address, I do not feel that, upon an occasion when I anticipate no opposition, it would be becoming in me to trespass further on your lordships' time. ( Hear, hear, hear.) I shall conclude by moving, with all * the sincerity and warmth the occasion calls for, an address which I think does not go too far in asking his Majesty to maintain inviolate the union between this country and Ireland. (Cries of " Hear, hear.") My lords, such a course will have the beneficial effect of convincing the deluded people of Ireland that the course they have been engaged in, for some time past, will be attended with nothing but ruin to themselves, and that by altering that course they will give the best hope and promise of their future obedience to the laws, by which they will advance the interests of their country. ( Hear. ) I derive considerable confidence as to the manner in which this address will be estimated by the whole country. I feel this ' confidence from the votes of last night which appear in the papers now on the table before your lordships, by which this address appears to have been car ried in the other house by a majority unparalleled in the annals of parliamentary history. (Great cheer inc.) I also feel this confidence when I look to the other side of the question, and find that only 38 of the Irish members, or, I believe, tellers included, only 39 voted for the question of repeal, but 59 Irish members, voted against, consequently, of the Irish members themselves, notwith standing all the arts used during the last election, there is a considerable majority in favour of this address. (Cheers.) In Ireland, it is not true that the general feeling is in favour of repeal. And whatever feeling has been produced in its favour is the result of the most mischievous proceedings. Indeed the wealth and intelligence, and the great majority of numbers, will support the union ; and, feeling confident of the success of this measure, and that your lordships will support the authority of the laws, while, at the same time, as far as human means can, you will correct any real cause of complaint, I conclude by moving that this house do agree to the said address. The LORD CHANCELLOR—My lords, I am sure it must be unnecessary for me, in rising to second the mo tion of my noble friend, to detain your lordships but a few moments in expressing my cordial and deliberate concur rence in the proposition. (Hear, hear.) The eloquent and impressive speech which you have just heard might be sufficient to recommend, even if its merits failed to re commend it, the proposition now submitted to you. But I anticipate with my noble friend so entire a unanimity in concurring with the address of the other house, that I am confident that even less than I shall now urge to your lordships would be thrown away on an occasion like this. It is true, as my noble friend has stated, that this is not an unprecedented course for the lords spiritual and temporal to pursue. On the last occasion, when your lordships went up to the throne with a similar address from both houses, it was to testify your loyalty and regard, when an attack was made on the life of the existing Alonarch ; and you are called on to preserve the same course, in order to testify your con currence with your fellow-subjects in the other house in re sisting proceedings which directly tend, in my conscience I believe, to endanger the existence, not of the monarch, not of the peers, not of the commons only, or altogether, but to put in jeopardy the very existence of the empire itself. (Cheers.) My lords, I cannot view the proceeding that has taken place in the other house, without heartily rejoicing in the result of that elaborate debate. I feel with my noble friend, that if anything can reclaim the de luded portion of our Irish fellow-subjects from the errors into which they have been so industriously misled—if anything can open their eyes to see the folly of persevering in that course, and making themselves other men's tools, that they may be those men's dupes ( Hear), for those men's sordid gains, and for their own inevitable un doing—if anything ,can show them—and they are teachable and reclaimable, and to be weaned from those errors, and from those false guides—if any thing can so teach and can so reclaim them, it must be the lesson which was read to them by the united representa tives, in a free Parliament, of the people of the United Kingdom—when they find a minority of their own represen tatives, as my noble friend has said, and when they find, that of all the various shades of character, and temper, and prin ciple, and talent, which may naturally be supposed to dis tinguish the five hundred and sixty odd members of Eng land, Wales, and Scotland, even in despite of accident it self, the chapter of chance gave them no possibility of hav ing those pernicious 'doctrines supported by one single Eng lish Member. Yes, there was one, the exception proving the rule—and of all the members of this island of Great Britain in parliament assembled, but one solitary exception was found to the prevailing sense —may I call it the good and the sound sense--of the representatives of the people of Great Britain. It could not be believed that the whole nation was wrong. It could not be believed that that could be fatal to Ireland which was so beneficial to England ; and accordingly, among all the various shades of character in the House of Commons, but one solitary hand was raised in favour of the measure. He hoped and trusted that this memorable lesson would not be thrown away upon Ireland. (Hear, hear.) It was a painful and lamentable thing to think that'll-eland—a country endowed by nature as if in its most bountiful mood—a country enjoying every natural, almost every moral, and so many political advantages— formed, as it were, for the enjoyment of every degree of national prosperity, and advancing as it was in prosperity even in despite of those men—of those unnatural children of the soil—who, by their arts, obstructed the benefits of nature, and were at war with the bounty of Providence itself. But in despite of these unnatural attempts to depress Ireland, a manifest, a sensible, even a rapid pro gress was making in every species of improvement. ( Hear, hear.) Was it not lamentable that the country was not allowed to run that race for which nature had made her capable ? ( Hear, hear.) And, great God ! why was it so ? It was not that there existed grievances ; it was not that the people complained; it was not that blots existed in the laws—with the exception of one or two insignificant ones, which he hoped, with the assistance of their lord ships, would speedily be razed and obliterated from their books—it was not for any of these causes, but it was be cause there existed certain individuals, who were gifted by that same nature with great talents—who had improved those talents by assiduity and perseverance—who were pos sessed of large acquirements, and gifted with the capacity of raising themselves to wealth by honesty and to power by inno cent ambition—it was all because those misguided men—as much mistaking their happiness as their honour, and at war with their own interests, as well as with the interests of their fellow subjects, preferred to honest industry, and its credit able and honourable gains, a life of agitation ( Cheers), a life of agitation; supported by a species of per4onal as well as political mendicancy (Loud cheers) --a state which, even to the unfortunate victims of such practices, if their natural and honourable feelings were not ierverted, must be attended with unbearable shame. (Hear, hear.) There had been geniuses of other times reduced to o vert! and beggary. One had recorded his own disgrace in his en ii immortal verses. He was the second of modern poets, per haps the third poet of all ages. When reduced to poverty, not by his own idleness or extravagance, but by the politi cal contests of his country, and by persecution, over which he had no control, he begged his bread during a season. Bet, far from glerying in his beggary, he has recorded that the sense of shame ender whith he received the alms of his , fellow-countrymen was such, that the mere sensatien made every fibre in his system quiver with s ha me . He trusted that few were gifted with such geniuses that they could long suffer the shame, or brook the indignity of living by such means as these, or who, in order to perpetuate such unmanly support, could continue to plunge their country in distress and ruin. He hoped and trusted that this lesson Which the people of Ireland received vi` from parliament mild not be thrown away. He looked upon this as a new era. He looked forvt'ard from it to a renewal of peace, harmony, amity, and good recline , between the sister countries ; and he was certain that when the people of Ireland found that the people of Eng land did not join them, or rather did not join their leaders (Hear)—when they found that the rational and thinking portion of the people would not join them, they would take another direction, and would emancipate themselves from the fetters in which they have been retained by force, fraud, and violence, and would join both houses of Parlia ment in binding more tightly, instead of endeavouring to sever, those bonds by which the two countries were united for their mutual benefit, and in receiving and profiting by the benefits which the perpetuity of those bonds alone was calculated to give. He (the Lord Chancellor) had the most sanguine expectation that their lordships would now, instead of relaxing, increase their endeavours to remove the grievances of the Irish people, and, above all, that they would hold out their hand to assist a party hitherto too little considered—namely, the middle party—a, party of which his noble friend the Lord Chancellor of Ireland . had repeatedly spoken in that house with his usual eloquence and force—a party equally removed from extreme violence on the one hand, as from extreme violence on the other, and a party which had been always equally loyal and pa triotic. (Hear.) He heartily concurred in the address, and he hoped that their lordships would unanimously join him in that concurrence. Much had already been done for Ireland since the period of the legislative union, but much remained still to be done ; many evils had to be re moved, and the sooner they were removed the better ; and he trusted that the effect of that removal, and the result of last night's division in the other house would be to perpe tuate the union of the two parts of the kingdom. (Cheers. ) The Duke of WELLINGTON, concurring fully as he did in the present address, would merely trouble their lordships with a single remark upon one point. He agreed, as was stated in the address to the King, that the union with Ireland was of the greatest possible benefit and utility to the people of both countries, but more especially to the people of Ireland itself. (Hear.) He also concurred in approving of their lordships and the other house joining in an address to his Majesty on a subject of such importance. The Marquis of LONDONDERRY said though he frequently differed from the noble earl opposite in his opi nions, he should be ashamed of himself if he did not say that, in his opinion, some of his measures, and especially those intended for the benefit of Ireland, were of the greatest utility to that country, and would carry down the noble lord's name to posterity as a great statesman. Il e cordially concurred in the address. The Marquis of WESTMEATH could not let the op-, portunity pass without expressing his deep thanks an." heartfelt concurrence in the address, and the high gratin-. cation he felt in the manner in which it was introduce d by the noble earl. Commons, Gll address E desiring GREY w thena s t a h m et 10 conferencev e dt agreed h at t a o b th er e n me t s h s e ag p e ai b n e ted se c n h t a t rt o i on the subject matter of the address agreed to last nigh t. The Usher of the Black Rod having announced that night Commons were ready for the conference, the Marq uis °„ Lansdowne and some other Lords were appointed man a g e ; - of the conference, and they left the house for that purpo se. On their return they communicated to the house. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE stated that they h net au the Commons in the Painted Chamber and had conlingni cated their lordships' concurrence in the address, by filling Tern up the blank with the words "Lords Spiritual an poral." Earl GREY then moved that Lords with white staves be appointed to wait upon his Majesty, to know when it would he his Majesty's pleasure to receive the a ddress of both Houses of Parliament. URY Shortly afterwards, the Earl of SHAFTE SB announced that his Majesty would receive the address to morrow (this day,) at half-past one o'clock. The house then adjourned till twelve o'cloc k this day. —......- HOUSE OF COMMONS -- , The SPEAK EIt took t h e chair at a quar ter after five o'clock. CONFERENCE WITH THE LORDS. Upon the motion of Mr. SPRING RICE, a conference was agreed to with the Lords, and a c ommittee was ap pointed to manage it, consisting of Mr. S. Rice, Sir R. PPeel, Mr. Goulburn, Sir J. Wrottes lev, Sir D. Sandford, April 30 . Sir H. Pa r nell, Lord Ebrington, the Lord Advocate, and several other members. the Upon atrt ehsoe resolutions ur t htlieoornrdessthouifrpntsho hisfa d t h l o i p e rs c em o m ui sp m eod i n t t o t t e h e te , aksttbe Mr. i in. e S tco . t c ß oofn l t C s hi ti E ee r s at repealtaitocd n th of the union. MESSAGE FROM THE LORDS. A message from the lords was brouht up, stating th at their lordships had agreed to the Nova Scotia Land Com pany Bill, the Exchequer Offices Bill, the Calder Navi gation Bill, and other private bills. o rder' The SPEAKER said that Wednesday precedence' an o d servance Bill, and as there were a number n day, the order of the day must have ptooad. relating to the subject in the hands of hon. in must be called on in the sequence in which th e Y s Ob- The first order for that evening was the Lord's fDaY•tions hers, he wished to ascertain whether it was the pleasure ° Hear, house that those petitions' should be presented. ( be hear, hear.) If honourable members would content to • •without o present their petitions . ; 1 ., "Puri ducing 'debate upon them (Hear, hear), wh' e- ini be unnecessary as the order of the day would be read were mediately after the petitions were presented —if this n the pleasure of the house he would call over the names in the order in which they stood in his (the Speaker's) paper. LORD'S DAY OBSERVANCE BILL. . tions Sir ANDREW AGNEW presented several ~ Peabbath. from many places for the better observance of the S _, . Similar petitions were presented by Mr. Mostyz Z . Tooke, Lord Mandeville, Mr. Green, Lord Wate r n, 3lr. Estcourt, Col. Conolly, Mr. Ramsden, LorcllkLil, Ma ddox, Lord Clive, Mr. Throgmorton, Mr. Hodges , !::, 31N, atkins, Sir R. Norreys, Mr. Wilson Potter, Mr. Cavendish'Llo Simeon, Sir E. Knatchbull, Lord i 0 Mr. Callender, Mr. Shawe, Mr. Baines, Sir H. W i l t J. Oswald, from and Mr. Baring ; against the bill by I‘ . • in favour of the Glasgow, signed by 16,700 individua s _._ Sir Parnell, bill by Mr. Johnstone, Mr. Lister, ,_. ___ Henry) three Mr. Shaw Lefevre, Mr. Chapman , e mbersi the l Mr. U Wynn . s Johnstone, Mr. Christmas, Mr. Tynte, Mr. Blamire, Mr. H. Johns and several more petitions to the same effect. for pre s e and .ti . three r s e e e , e ral against petitionsb 1 1 with y t hII whichl r order of Sir A. AGNEW rose, and moved that the o the day for the second reading of the Bill for the Better Observance of the Sabbath be now read. Mr. WILBRAHAM begged to take that opportunity. of for Th th e e or b d e e t r te o r f o th b e se d rv ay an f e o e r o t f h t e he sec s o a n b d ba r t e h ad l i t n_ a g s trusted in favour of Sir Andrew Agnew's bill in a rli cal t e Hum he e, had bße ern d -' form. His vote would be given in accordance spirit of those petitions. • of the i i the r ea( on which "ng the Mr. MOSLEY rose and said no subject , elc ee .Pt ti ed oc h reform question and the slave trade, had ever e: ia i ns yeti wunhfiaichrl tions. The present bill was essentially deep and general interest, and called forth s e e sa l c ue as that attacked b ac e k e e n d la b s o t t i l 'ea in r t a h n r d ow o -n ut ou of t t . hdeoob i ri t isi. : l 4 o o t n eh . : t e a f inr( l th ad been most bers, in looking over the margin of "penalty," and, without taking the tr °llble tbe a b ill the contents, immediately concluded that it in occasion t° He wished to confine himself on the present di,c the principle of the bill, and not to enter into anyntlydis sion of the clauses. They would be more cower', e in corn cussed at a future stage of the proceedings , nanife Led to be, mittee. In a Christian country, such as this pro e matter ot of pains and penalties. That was an ineorrectTenclasion. the due observance of the Sabbath must appear a , , t i ei vr primary importance. (Cheers, Hear, hear, and OW )„ . . ta 0 e aware it had been said by some hon. member', t ! in sur i i 3 e laws already in existence were amply sufficien.s,rate, 1 the due observance of the Sabbath. As a snag' i,orta,in.a (Mr. Mosley) had found too much reason tt: , F, 11 ,! sac red quite oftdfferent opinion. The law for preservin, 7,'-'_,.s }lire inoperative. the Sabbath, as that law at present s tood' " as . turned up his eyes at this. He inoperative. The hon. member for Mon E 5 coe hl vv., i ore dr"; to ask the hon. member whether there svasec'of the we, ek „," kenness on that day than on any other daY bill of t h e not- Let hon. members look at the object of the « every class !icli baronet ; it was to secure that fceedona t o The bill d' t the country which they did not now possess. t. ,' It d id "` ' t not at all trench on the liberty of any subjec 1,1 be the I.as He Would tiou prohibit any innocent recreation. t recrea man to support it if it did. Was it an innocent distant dist a le to get drunk on the Sabbath Day ? To go a gre , 1 ,, ) l c, on journeys of pleasure ? (Cries of ~ Oh,. 0 11, „ °n 0h : oh • would ask those hon. members who cried .t not for the what was the Lord's Day made for ? (Mr. Mosleq in' Was it fr°,l worship of God Almighty ? They had Pe t they Iteie t h at journeymen bakers and coachmen, praying