The Sun. — London, England, 1834-12-23 00:00:00

there were none. It was the first time in which Mr. O'Connell found himself in much the same situation in Dublin as Mr. Sheil once was at Pennenden heath—the unheard orator of an " unspoken speech." But then he can do as Mr. Sheil did on that occa sion—publish it as if spoken, with all the cheers that would have accompanied it had it been but heard. That the meeting was disturbed, and that its object was defeated, there can be no doubt. But what was its object ? It' was to make it appear that the inhabi tants of Dublin had met together and resolved to coerce the King in the exercise of his lawful pre rogative, as to the free choice of his own public servants. It was not the measures of the new Ministry which the people of Dublin were called upon to condemn, for those measures have not vet come before the public. They were called upon by the Roman Catholic agitators to pass a sentence of Papal excommunication —upon whom ? Upon Sir Robert Peel and the Duke of Wellington—the authors of Roman Catholic emancipation—the Statesmen who dared to oppose public opinion in England, to open the the gates of legislative and political power to the very men who now with signal ingratitude and folly conspire to exclude them f rom th e counc il s o f the Sovereign. Let the Protestants of England learn what sacrifices Popish agitators are capa bl of making from this one remarkable instance. Let them learn how little it costs their feelings or their consciences, to cancel all recollection of inestimable obligations, and sacrifice their benefactors. The liberality of Wellington and Peel cherished the snake that now attempts to sting them to death. Nor did the agitators forget, in the frenzy of faction to whom they are indebted for all the privileges which a Protestant Constitution can bestow on the most loyal Protestant subjects ; strange to say, the only, or almost the only reported words of Mr. Sheil—a King's Counsel, too—are the following taunts to the Orangemen :—" Remember, Orangemen, I con gratulate you—the Duke of Wellington carried eman cipation—the Catholic emancipator I I wish you joy." Thus, at the very moment that the spirit of Roman Catholic faction was busied in endeavouring to effect the political extermination of the Duke of Wel lington and Sir Robert Peel, at that very moment one cf the leaders of that faction cast in the teeth of his opponents the " astounding fact" that Wellington was the great benefactor of the Rom an C a th o li cs ! Did not Mr. Sheil perceive that such a taunt recoiled with tenfold force upon himself and his intolerant and priest-ridden party ? " Remember, Orangemen," he says, " that we, the Roman Catholics of Ireland, owe our political existence to Wellington, and, there fore, we will do every thing in our power to vilify his name, to slander his character, to belie his intentions, and to ensure, if possible, his political destruction." It is quite certain that if it had not been for the liberality—what the great mass of the Protestants of England thought the too great liberality, of the pre sent Premier and the Duke of Wellington, the Roman Catholics of Ireland never, at least in the present generation, could have obtained the measure of political freedom and power which they now enjoy. The Whigs, whose recall they demand, to enable them to supplant all regular government in Ireland, to extir• pate the Protestant religion, and dismember the em pire by the repeal of the Union--the Whigs, we say, never ventured to think of, much less to propose, such a measure as unqualified emancipation. They threw the question even of qualified emancipation overboard wh(n Mt Canning was in office, and the Whigs crov d la:hind him on the Treasury Bench. The Duke of Wellington was a Tory, yet he had the ex reme liberality, and no less courage, to propose, and the persevering firmness, with the aid of Sir Robert Peel, to carry a measure of unqualified emancipation. The Whigs were astonished, and applauded it as an act of transcendant wisdom—the Roman Catholics vowed eternal gratitude—they promised statues and monuments to perpetuate the recollection of his bene ficence. If they did raise any monument of sufficiently solid materials to endure for a single lustrum, it has outlasted their "eternal" gratitude.—Morning Herald. We understand that the letter of Sir Robert Peel to his constituents has produced a most favourable im pression in the diplomatic and influential circles in Paris. Letters have been received in town from par ties of weight in the French capital, who were consi dered unfavourably disposed towards our present Mi nistry, expressive of the highest admiration and satis faction at the address, which has excited such a power ful effect on the minds of Englishmen. Our Paris correspondent, in the postscript of his letter, dated Saturday, which reached us by express, and was in serted in our impression of yesterday, mentioned the gratifying fact of the great monied interest of France being perfectly content with the manifesto of the Pre mier. The immediate rise in the French Funds must convince all dispassionate persons that in France no fears will be entertained of the pacific policy of our Government. Such an assurance would of course be needless for our readers, but we hope that our Whig and Radical contemporaries, who have been so anxious to impress upon the public the danger arising from a Conservative Administration for the preservation of tranquillity in Europe, will be sufficiently candid to state the truth ; if not from an abstract love of the principle, at least from the ambition of being consi dered veritable organs of opinion in every clime, how ever those opinions may differ from their wishes.— Morning Post. Once more, for the last time, because it is the latest moment at which such exhortations can be made avail able, we most earnestly recommend and urge all the gentlemen who have signed the requisition for the great city meeting this day, and all who agree with them in sentiment, and all whom they can by discussion or example influence, to attend in person and main tain their opinions by their . presence, their voices, and their votes. Their enemies are on the alert and busy. They are beating up for bottle-holders in every direction to pre-occupy in crowd s the place of assembly, to confound the proceedings of the requisitionists, and defeat the object for which the meeting has been called. It is true that the advertisement has been issued by, and on the part of, and is addressed to, those who are " desirous of expressing their as surance of loyalty and attachment to their Sovereign on the occasion of the late exercise of his prerogative," or, in other words, who approve the late exercise of the Royalprerogative, in opposition to those who have avowed that they regard it as a grievance, and would expel from office the Ministers whom it has called into activity. It might therefore in strictness be made a question, whether they who condemn the entire pur pose far which, and for which only a certain class of persons, concurring in its expediency, have declared that they will meet together, are entitled t o a d m i ss i on amongst the l a tt er , when their presence could tend to nothing but the proof of a fact already known and loudly blazoned—namely, that there are bodies who differ from the requisitionists, and who condemn the late exercise .of the Royal power. If however we had the ordering of such matters, we should say to the constitu tionalists, " Don't stand upon punctilio, or even upon your undoubted right to exclude from a meeting, the design of which is to give expression to a definite sentiment, those who would do their utmost to obstruct that expression, but face them, and let the country se e what descriptions of persons range themselves on either side of this interesting question, and who and what are the respective chiefs." Nothing, we state frankly, would be to us less surprising than that the anti- Royalists who threaten to intrude upon this day's meeting should mean to employ the weapons of cla mour, violence, and very possibly even personal out rage, rather than permit an assembly of which wealth, intelligence, and character constitute the bases, to have even the shadow of freedom for the declaration of sen timents which would find an echo in every corner of the realm. But honest English gentlemen ought not to shrink from violence in the discharge of either a private or public duty. They have the laws to protect them. They may become each of them, as the necessity arises, peace officers, and with their own right hands protect themselves from aggression. If noise, and uproar, and fury, and insult, be had recourse to as a means to embroil the proceedings, and to make it appear that they have no ostensible result of the na ture contemplated by those who signed the requisition, then, as a last expedient, having tried every other, the requisitionists may still command the press as their medium for publishing the resolutions which a facti ous tumult will have prevented then!' frera earrying viva voce, and may vindicate their own characters and the cause which they support, by publishing their names and commercial or other denominations. This, as upon the whole the most manly and effective course, is what we would seriously press upon'the attention of the committee. It will at once dispel the accusations of " hole-and-corner" meetings, a species of accusa tion which we admit would, in the present instance, be an absurd one, because, from the spirit of the adver tisement, no matter what a man's politics may be, if not a " merchant, banker, or shipowner," he ought not properly to claim admission to the meeting. Nevertheless, as we have said before, face the enemy—let him have all conceivable advantages of mob-numbers, mob-wisdom, mob taste, and mob-virtue, and see what he can make of them. The exposure at least will do good ; but wherever the assembly is to be held, and under what soever circumstances, let every man who has signed the requisition attend, and enforce its object by his presence. There is to be another meeting also, at a later hour, and constructed differently from that to which we have adverted, though at no great distance from the same spot. The Lord Mayor, it is known, has invited to dinner a company, amongst whom arc likely to appear the greater portion of His Majesty's Ministers. We have no doubt that the official heads of the Government will take this occasion to re-state and confirm the declarations contained in Sir Robert Peel's address, as to the principles of their policy, foreign and domestic. No small interest is therefore in many quarters attached to this political festivity. But there is a topic to which our notice has been reluctantly drawn by what occurred at some recent dinners. These performances being chiefly under the guidance of a class of fanatics called " ultra-Tories," as foolish in their way, and indirectly as mischievous, as the Destructives themselves, no wonder that every sort of absurdity should be per petrated by them. We will mention one. A preju dice had gained gro un d i n some quar t ers , t o t h e effect that Queen Adelaide has habitually dabbled in politics, and that to her may be traced certain anti-popular tendencies which have been imputed to the Court circle of our gracious Sovereign. Now we confess that at one time we had been induced to believe what we are now convinced was a paltry slander. It became our duty on one occasion to exonerate her Majesty from an odious charge of that nature—to which quite innocently on our part our columns had given circula .tion. Yet is it not suspected—and why ? Because, forsooth, these ultra-Tory blockheads will not let her Majesty's reputation be at peace, because they degrade her into their factious idol, and toast her name, apart from her Royal husband's, with boisterous and frantic vociferations, thus proclaiming to the world that the Queen is guilty of sympathising with them in their odious and stupid animosity towards the rights of the people—that her Majesty, in short, is herself an ul tra-Tory, an enemy to reform, and an abettor of misgo vernment. There never was a more cruel piece of madness than this, nor one of which its victim had more grievous reason to complain—and Queen Ade laide is indebted for it to her professed friends, the Holy Alliance pupils of Great Britain. So another most offensive exhibition in the form of a toast was played off at the Buckinghamshire dinner, where the Duke of Wellington was described as the " conqueror of France." 'We are heartily sorry the gallant and manly-minded Duke was not there present, for he would assuredly have rebuked such senseless and even criminal adulation. The Duke of Wellington never conquered France ; his powerful understand ing would have repudiated with ridicule the possi bility of such an enterprise, had it been proposed to him, no matter by whom. Had he even possessed the means of conquering France, his knowledge and morality as a Statesman would have induced him ro reject with disdain the infliction of such a calamity upon Europe as the annihilation of one of her noblest political communities. Such stuff would be unworthy of notice, but for its capacity to wound the feelings of a brave and great people, who ought to be respected, were it for nothing else but the hard and manly con tests which they have maintained against us, and for the friendship which we have now the happiness of reciprocating with them. The letter of complaint and remonstrance from a gallant Frenchman in yesterday's Times, respecting the above insult offered to his country, ought to shame the firebrand orators who seek thus wantonly to embroil two allied nations. To return, however, to the Lord Mayor's dinner, we • trust that the toasts may be prescribed and arranged by somebody in his sober senses, and that nothing may be said or insinuated, even in the shape of un called-for acclamation, which under the name of com pliment to an individual may subject that individual to the reproach of millions of men.—Times. CITY WARD ELECTIONS. Sunday being St. Thomas's Day, the Wardmotes com menced yesterday, according to annual custom, in the dif ferent city precincts for the election of Common Council men and other Ward officers for the year ensuing. The following Wards returned their old members, no alteration having taken place from death, resignation, or opposition, viz. :—Walbrook, Aldgate, Broad -street, Queen hithe, Vintry, Candlewick, Cornhill, Dowgate, Bridge, Bil lingsgate, Lime, Langbourne, Cripplegate Within, Coleman street,Bishopsgate, andyarringdon Without. In the following Wards a small change took place, through death and resignations ; but without a contest : Tower Wards.—Mr. Rushton resigned, and Mr. Mait land was elected. Farringdon Within.—Mr. Ashurst resigned, Mr. Wil liams deceased, and Mr. Holt and Mr. Faulkner were elected. Castle Baynard.—Mr. Slade, having served 47 years, re signed, and Mr. Verinder was elected. Cheap Ward.—Mr. Stevens resigned, and Mr. Under- Sheriff Hardwick was elected. I am the friend of free discussion, but I cannot allow you to propose a candidate if you are not eligible to vote, which, as a non-freeman, you are not. Mr. WILSON proposed Mr. Parr". Mr. SAUL, in proposing Mr. Alcock, said, that their re presentatives were hitherto elected without any declaration of their political principles, but the gentleman he had the honour to propose declared his principles through the me dium of a handbill, which stated that he was a sincere Reformer, a friend to triennial Parliaments, universal suffrage, and vote by ballet—(Cheers.) Sir PETER LAURIE then put the names of the respective candidates to the vote. Mr. AIATTHEWS was the first. He declared himsel be a Reformer. Mr. MORTRAM was the second. He declared that, ever since reason dawned upon him, he was a Reformer, and a friend to every principle which embraced liberality. Mr. GODSON was the third. He had, he said, the honour of soliciting the suffrages of the constituency as an independent man. Though averse to the vote by ballot, he-was a friend to the limited duration of Parliaments. He opposed the ballot upon principle ; for he considered that the vote given in secrecy wanted the independence and in tegrity of that which was publicly recorded.—( Hear, hear.) The public vote had been latterly adopted in the Court of Common Council, and the efficacy of it would be felt that day ; for every man who sought their suffrages would be called upon to account for each vote, whereas, by the ballot, there would be an exception from scrutiny.—(Applause.) He certainly thought that too much time had been spent by the Common Council in political discussions.—(Loud cries of " No, no," and groans.) The time of the Com mon Council would be better employed in improving the trade of the city, and locally bettering the condition of the people.—(Great disapprobation.) Every vote he had given was given with the approbation of his conscience. A voice from the crowd—The address to the King, what do you say to that ?—(Loud cries of " Ay, ay ; let's hear of that.") Mr. GODSON said he proved himself a friend to reform by attending to the wants of his poorer fellow citizens— (Loud cries of " The address, the address! ") He certainly had voted against that measure ; and the reason was, he saw no necessity tor it. He was told that a crisis had ar rived. He thought that a crisis was a bad time for propos ing such an address.—(Cries of " Oh, oh.") It was further said that these were times of great difficulty. He saw no difficulties, and he believed the public were of the same opinion ; for out of 66 parishes in the city, not one assem bled to complain. There was not the slightest regret at the dismissal of his Majesty's Ministers.—(Great groaning and uproar.) There wore 26 wards in the city, and only 1 met on the occasion. He regretted that he differed from his colleagues in the vote he had given, but if be should be again elected, he should again act in obedience to the dic tates of his conscience. --(Cheers.) Mr. STACEY (one of the old members) next addressed the meeting. His friend (Mr. Godson) had votedl against the address to the King, because, as he said, there was no excitement abroad ; but he (Mr. Stacey) would contend that excitement did exist ; for though the free-voters (lid not meet, the Common Council did, and manfully per formed their duty.--(Loud cheers.) Mr. GODSON—Out of 266 members of the Committee, only 109 met, and the address was only carried by a majo rity of 49, and no more than 60 went up with it. Mr. STACEY said that that was to be accounted for by the shortness of the notice. He received notice only an hour before the moment of starting.—(Loud cries of " A trick, a trick.") An ELECTOR—Whose duty is it to serve the notices ? Mr. WALTON—It is the duty of the Sheriffs. They first wait on his Majesty, to know when he will receive the ad dress, and afterwards serve the notices. A GENTLEMAN, on the part of the Sheriffs, said that those gentlemen had no idea that his Majesty would receive the address until after the funeral of the Duke of Glouces ter, and were therefore limited in time. When the votes were taken, there appeared for Mat thews, 40 ; Mortram, 45 ; Godson, 37 ; Stacey, 46 ; Rolls, 33 ; Summers, 31 ; Walton, 30 ; Lorkin, 40 ; Parry, 23 ; Alcock, 30. A poll was then demanded in behalf of Mr. Parry. Bassishaw.—Mr. Baker resigned, and Mr. Ebenezer Davis was elected. PORTSOKEN 11 Those marked with a John Howard John Parker 1 Nathaniel Negus 1 The Lord Mayor presid, ARD—Returns Five. are fresh Candidates. Abraham Saul .. *George M'Kenzie William P. Tyers 41 for Alderman Johnson. BREAD-STREET II Deputy J. Mathie... ..... 23 Davison 22 Cracklow Lawrence 22 Holmes 22 Williams Bridge Mr. de Greve and Mr. 'ARD—Returns Twelve Kipling *Larmer Thomson *Harrild *Maughan ... Cope Shuttleworth resigned BILLINGSGA Duke 34 *Old 39 Barnes Redpath 35 Curling (Deputy) Child 34 'E —Returns Ten. Blenham Megarey Hossack Francis Tyler. CRIPPLEGA TE WI *Baylis Jones 5l 'HO UT—Returns Eight. Atkin 4B *Maskel 52 Dixon Alder 3O *Horne 9 Robins Han '"' Sweeting 62 ALDERSGATE-ST Lorkin Matthews Walton Rolls Mottram .. REET—Returns Eight Godson Summers Stacy * Parry *Alcock Q UEENHITA Acocks ..... Howell ................. 11 .............. Curtis Hooper ................... 11 .. 11 ..................... 10 'E—Returns Six. *Kimard *Sykes Goss CORDIVA/NEj Wood (Deputy) Croucher S'--Returns Eight Williams Culverwell Phillips *Lott Lamb Heath Hall The polling will finally :lose to-morrow even: ALDERSGATE WARD. Politics formed a leading feature in the proceedings of this Ward, of which Sir Peter Laurie is the Alderman. It returns eight Common Councillors, and there were two new candidates Mr. Godson, one of the old members, having raised a host of enemies by voting against the ad dress of his Majesty upon the dismissal of the Melbourne Administration. Mr. Noaais asked the Alderman whether he had per mission to propose a candidate. It was but fair to state that he (Mr. Norris) was not a freeman. Sir PETER—I wish to have every gentleman's opinion. THE SUN, LONDON, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 23, 1834. BISHOPSGATE TVARD. At the wardmoto held for the election of Common Council and other ward officers, Alderman COPELAND presided. Mr. SPINGALL, before the election, wished to ask of each of the Common Council two questions—first, whether they had voted for the address to the King upon the abrupt dismissal of his Minieters ; and, secondly, whether they had voted for declaring his Majesty's answer that which they well knew it was not, namely, a gracious answer.—( Cheers.) In the course of his speech, Mr. Spingall was called to order by the Alderman for introducing the name of the King in a disrespectful manner ; the Alderman was sup ported by the meeting. Mr. Deputy WESTON would answer the question without delay—he had voted for the address, and he gloried in doing so. These were times in which it was a man's duty to speak out, and he should do so.—(Cheers.) The dis missal by his Majesty of his late Ministers, and calling to his Councils the Tory faction, was enough to fill with alarm the mind of every man who loved his country, and desired to see her institutions preserved and improved.— (Hear.) To suppose that the advantages the country had a right to expect from the Reform Bill would be given to the nation by the present Ministers, was absolute madness. Sir WILLIAM RAWLINS and several other Members of the Ward assured their constituents that they had voted in favour of the address. Mr. Deputy PEACOCK said, he had not only voted for it, but had been up with it ; and, as was the case upon former occasions, he had been treated most uncivilly by his Ma jesty for so doing.—( Hear.) He went up with the address upon the occasion of the Manchester Massacre, when the King told them to go home and mind their business, for they knew nothing about the matter.--(A laugh.) The Common Council were fairly runiped when they took to the Throne an address respecting the Queen ; but they cared not for that, for what they were doing was in the cause of an injured woman, and they did what every man who loved a woman ought to do—they stood by her in the hour of adversity.—(Hear, hear.) The people beheld in the late proceedings of the Court party, a desire to return to the old corrupt system, and the people ought not to relax in their opposition to Tory domination till they succeeded in driving the bishops from the House of Lords—in dis solving the union of Church and State—(Hear, hear) — and in giving the death-blow to priestcraft and kingcraft too.—(Cheers and murmurs.) Mr. STEVENS said it was unnecessary for him to say that he had supported the address, as well as the omission of the word " gracious" from the motion recording the an swer, for he had seconded both. He fully concurred in all that had fallen from the last speaker—subject, however, to a little explanation as to the meaning of the word " king craft ;" for although he disliked and would oppose as staunchly as his colleague could do, the abuses which usual ly surrounded the Court of a kingly Government, he did not hesitate to declare that he believed a well-regulated Monarchy was the form of Government best adapted to the wants and wishes of the English people.—(Cheers.) He made no doubt but that his colleague used the term in this sense.—(Hear.) Mr. Under-Sheriff PEARSON then stepped forward, and said that as he was then called upon by his constituents to declare how he had acted in relation to the recent changes in the Administration, he should candidly answer how he voted, and boldly declare his reasons why he had done so. —(Hear.) _Having the honour to fill an official situation which would impose certain ministerial duties upon him at the approaching election, he had thought it his duty not to take any part in the meetings which he was delighted to find were being held in every part of this vast metropolis, to en able the people to speak their sentiments upon the extra ordinary events which had recently taken place ; but upon the day of their annual election the constituent body had a right to call for the opinions of their representative s on passing events, and he would freely deliver his.—(Cheers.) He had not voted for the address, because he was necessarily ab sent from the Court, being in attendance on the Judges at the Old Bailey.—(Hear, hear.) Had he been there he would have voted for it ; he justified and defended every part of it. He understood that the objectors to the ad dress did not found their objections so much upon its phra seology as they did upon the principle which it involved. They objected to it because, as they said, it interfered with one of the prerogatives of the Crown. It pray e d hi s Ma jesty not to appoint a certain class of men, holding opinions detrimental to the welfare of the nation, to preside over his councils ; and the opponents of the measure say that the Common Council should allow his Majesty to exercise his prerogative, and appoint his Ministers first, and then peti tion him not to appoint them afterwards.--(Cheers and laughter.) Would these praters about constitutional law Predicate the same nonsense respecting any of the other prerogatives of the Crown?—(Hear.) It was equally the prerogative of the King to make war and peace ; and, ac cording to this doctrine, the numerous petitions of the Com mon Council, from 1800 to 1814, praying his Majesty to make peace, and to stay the ravages of a war carried on to put down the rising liberties of Europe, were all infringe ments of the King's prerogative, and ought not to have been presented till peace was actually proclaimed.— (Cheers.) If, in the exercise of the Royal prerogative, we ascertained that his Majesty was about to plunge this na tion in such another sanguinary war, ought we to de lay our addresses and petitions till the sword was drawn from the scabbard, and his Majesty's gracious declaration of his Royal hostility should be dyed in human blood ?—(Hear.) The prerogative of mercy was the King's most cherished privilege—it was described to be the bright est jewel in the Monarch's crown ; yet because it was the King's prerogative, must the people wait till it was actually exercised before they made it the subject of address or pe tition ?—( Hear.) What would the friends of the poor creatures in the condemned cells of Newgate think of any one who would advise them that as mercy is the preroga tive of the Crown, it would be an indecent interference for them to petition, and recommend them to wait until their friends were either pardoned or hanged, and tell them that when they were executed would be the proper time for a remonstrance or address, as the Royal decision might hap pen to meet their expectations ?—(Cheers.) The right of address, petition, and remonstrance was as valuable in its exercise to the King as to the people—(Hear)—for the Corporation of London upon all important occasions to em body the opinions of the people, and to address them re spectfully, but firmly, to the Royal ear, was to give to Royalty a privilege which in no other country could be its lot—(Hear)—the privilege of bearing the truth—(Cheers.) Read from the page of history the fate of those kings who have been fawned upon and flattered Until by the very same individuals they have been forsaken and betrayed. Could we but hear the bitter lamentations of fallen kings for not having in the day of their greatness and power been told the truth, we should know how to estimate the privileges which gives to the King of England this inestimable advantage over all the other monarchs of the earth—(Cheers.) The meet ing had been reminded by Mr. Stevens to attend the Tory meeting at the London Tavern the next day ; he (Mr. Pearson) had no doubt but that the recommendation would be attended to.—( Hear.) At any rate, as the meeting was in the Ward of Bishopsgate, there was one body of men chosen that day who were bound, by their oath of office, to attend ; he meant the inquest—(Hear)—for as they were sworn to examine all weights and measures—and the mea sures of his Majesty's Ministers were to be discussed at the meeting—they ought to be strictly examined—(Cheers and laughter)—they must be asked what measure of re form they intended for the Church ?—(Hear)—what mea sure of relief they intended to give to the Dissenters ? (Hear)—what measures of redress for unhappy Ireland ; and what measures of substantial renovation and improve ment in all our social institution ?—(Cheers.) It was said that we were to look now to measures, and not to men ; but he begged to acquaint the Inquest, that they had the power to punish, as well as the right to examine ; and if, at the morning meeting, they should find the measures false or defective, the authors of them would be at the Mansion house in the evening, dining with the Lerd Mayor, and then they might be found to be rendered amenable to justice for their offences.—(Cheers and liughter.) Mr. Pearson then entered into a long and elaborate exposition of his propositions for Corporation Reform ; and the other mem bers of the Common Council having, with the exception of Mr. Day, expressed their concurrence in the principles of the address, they were severally elected without opposition. Thanks were unanimously voted to the Alderman ; after which the Wardmote adjourned. BREAD-STREET WARD. The following is a list of the candidates put in nomina tion yesterday in this Ward. The names marked thus are those of new candidates ,—Messrs. M'Lawrence, Wil liams, Thompson, Kipling, Deputy Mathie, Bridge, Cracklow, Holmes, Davison, Lainson,* Maughan,# Har rild,* and Cope. Mr. Shuttleworth and Dr. Degrave retired from the office. A show of hands was taken, which Alderman Ansley declared in favour of the first twelve candidates on the above list. Mr. DIMES then demanded a poll on behalf of Mr. Cope, CRIPPLEGA TE WITHOUT. A WTardmote was held yesterday in St. Giles's church, Fore-street, for the purpose of electing Common Council men, constables, &c., for the outer part of the Ward of Cripplegate, for the year ensuing. The chair was taken by Mr. Alderman WOOD, M.P. Of the old members of the Court, Mr. Hulse and Mr. Ebenezer Taylor retire ; and the following are the new candidates :—Mr. Sweeting, linen-draper, of Fore-street ; Mr. Horne, a gentleman liv . ing retired in Barbican ; Mr. Baylis, carrier of Whitecross-street ; and Mr. Maskell, attorney, of Fore -street. The question being put to a show of hands, there ap pearkd for Mr. Baylis, 150 ; Mr. Jones, 120 ; Mr. Robin son, 120 ; Mr. Haines, 117 ; Mr. Sweeting, 114 ; Mr. Atkinson, 104 ; Mr. Maskell, 92 ; Mr. Dixon, 90 ; Mr. Alderman, 72 ; and Mr. Horne, 24. The Alderman declared the first eight returned by the show of hands. A poll was immediately demanded on behalf of Mr. Al derman, and by Mr. Horne ; and the Court was adjourned to the Workhouse for the same to take place. TVARD OF FARRINGDON WITHOUT. The wardmote for the election of Common Councilmen and other officers for the above Ward, for the ensuing year, was held yesterday in the New Court, Old Bailey. Mr. Alderman HARMER presided on the occasion, when the following gentlemen were unanimously re-elected as the representatives in the Court of Common Council for the in habitants of this Ward. For the north side, Mr. Deputy Blackett, Mr. W. A. Beckwith, Mr. Vincent Figgins, Mr. Alexander Galloway, Mr. Joshua Thomas Bedford, Mr. Underwood Price, Mr. Richard Taylor, and Mr. G. F. Harms. For the South side, Mr. Deputy Tickner, Mr. Robert Obbard, Mr. Henry Burn, Mr. James Ramshaw, Mr. Charles A. Savage, Mr. Joseph Charles, Mr. Henry Marriott, and Mr. Henry Butterworth. Mr. Duputy BLAcKET briefly returned thanks on be half of his colleagues and himself, for this renewal of the confidence it had been their and his happiness heretofore to enjoy. Mr. RICHARD TAYLOR returned thanks. He could not avoid reminding the Wardmote that the Court of Common Council had been exposed to great obloquy and abuse, for the exertions which they felt it their duty to make at the present important and momentous crisis. The Court of Common Council had been described, by a certain portion of the press, as the representatives of all that was dis graceful and immoral in the city of London. He was per fectly indifferent to scurrility and abuse from persons who now stood in the lowest state of political degradation that could be imagined in a free and intelligent country—per sons who, without taking time to be convinced of their error s by rational means, had all of a sudden wheeled round, and declared themselves supporters of views and principles which, but a few weeks before, they had held in the utmost detestation and contempt.--(Hear.) Despite the frowns of such individuals, he would ever be found ready fear lessly to assert the principles to which he had ever been at tached ; and he must say, that he considered the recent change in the Ministry to be a serious national calamity. It was a calamity only to be remedied by the manifestation of the public spirit of the country. It was a delusion to suppose that those reforms of abuses which the people an ticipated as the effects of the Reform Bill, would ever be obtained through the instrumentality of the Administration formed by the Duke of Wellington.. —an Administration composed of individuals who had ever been the foremost opponents of every reform. He should think those delu sions which he knew had prevailed were completely re moved by Sir Robert Peel's address to the electors of Tamworth. That address manifestly showed that the pre sent Addministration - w as formed to put a stop to the move ment party, as it was called ; or, in other words, to the progress of gradual, well-considered, moderate reforms. The declaration of Sir Robert Peel, that he would resist to the utmost the admission of Dissenters into the Universi ties, might be taken as a clue to the spirit upon which the present Administration was based ; and this declaration was made in the face of the opinion expressed last session by at least four-fifths of the present House of Commons—an as sembly which he heard was about to be in a short time un ceremoniously dismissed, and without any sufficient reason being assigned.—(Hear, hear.) It was said the King could do no wrong ; but he would put a case. Suppose his Majesty, in the exercise of his prerogative, had ap pointed to the Archbishopric of Canterbury his namesake, the Rev. R. Taylor.—(Loud laughter.) He could not, however, take so monstrous a case. Suppose that the King, exercising his prerogative, bad appointed the pre sent Right Honourable the Lord Mayor to be Lord High Chancellor of England.—(Renewed laughter.) The Tories would say that the Sovereign had a right to make such appointments ; but he would ask whether the spirit of the country would not revolt from them, or whe ther they could be properly made in the absence of an adviser, answerable and responsible to Parliament for the advice which might have led to them ? In the present case, the advisers were Wellington and Lyndhurst ; both of whom, he contended, were answerable to the represen tatives of the people for the advice they mischievously gave to their Monarch—(Hear, hear, hear.) Mr. Taylor con cluded by repeating his belief that no redress of grievances, no removal of abuses from the institutions of the country, in fine, that none of the results of the Reform Bill, could be expected from the individuals now composing the go vernment of the realm—(Loud cheers.) Mr. GALLOWAY returned thanks. He had been, in the worst of times, a Reformer, and he was so now in these the best of times, for such he considered them, as he did not feel the slightest dismay at seeing the Duke of Wel lington arrive again at power. He placed entire confidence in the understanding and spirit of the people at large-.. (Hear, hear.) Relying on the firmness, discretion, and proper conduct of the people, he held it impossible that any Ministry could exist that did not fully carry out the principles of the Reform Bill, and accord to the people a full, fair, and cheap government. He was sure that the recent chan g e would a d vance the cause of the people. In the House of Commons the battle of the people would be again fought, and there their triumph would be fully esta blished—(Hear, hear.) The Inquest Jurors were then sworn in for the several parishes of the Ward. 'Air. Brown complained of the nuisance of some of the Sunday-paper publishing-office s , and of the continuation of the nuisance occasioned by Car lile's exhibition of figures in Fleet-street. Mr. RoßEars then proposed a vote of thanks to Mr. Alderman Harmer for his impartiality as a Magistrate, his urbanity as a fellow-citizen, for the humanity and philanthropy with which he had filled the important office of sheriff, and far his conduct in the chair that day. Mr. NPLAUGHLAN moved, in addition to the vote, the approbation of the Wardmote of the conduct of Mr. Al derman Harmer, as being the only Alderman who had ven tured to accompany the city address, which had been lately laid before the King, on the subject of the recent change in the Ministry. Mr. R. TAYLOR seconded the motion, which was unani mously carried. Mr. Alderman HARMER returned thanks. On the motion of Mr. WILLIAMS, seconded by Mr. BECK, a vote of thanks was passed to the Common Coun cil of the Ward for the manly and independent manner in which they had, during the last year, discharged the duties of their oiEce. The ordinary oaths were then administered to the Com mon Council elect ; but when they were required 'to sub scribe the declaration provided by the statute 9th Geo. IV. in lieu of the old form of sacramental test, Mr. R. TAYLOR protested against the form of declara tion, and begged in subscribing to it to append the following words :—" Not meaning, thereby, in any way, to deny or question the undoubted right of Parliament to effect neces sary alterations and reforms in the Church establishment ; nor to surrender his right as an elector, to endeavour to obtain such reforms through 'Parliament." The Wardmote was then dissolved. PORTSOKEN WARD. The Wardmote of this Ward was holden yesterday in Aldgate Church at two o'clock. The Lord Mayor at tended. He briefly addressed the Wardmote, and ex pressed a hope that, as the object for which they were assembled was not one of a political character, they would abstain from all political feeling, and conduct their pro ceedings with regularity and decorum.—(Applause.) If he (the Lord Mayor) was to judge from the countenances of all around him he felt satisfied they would accede to his request.—(Cheers.) Mr. SCALES here rose, and was received, as he had been on entering the church, with loud and long con tinued cheering. He alluded at some length the legal proceedings between the inhabitants and Mr. Johnson, and said, that notwithstanding the verdict of a jury on Saturday in favour of the latter, the inhabitants would ultimately obtain their rights. To do so, however, would cost them upwards of 1,0001., by carrying the proceedings to a higher tribunal, where justice must prevail ; and though he had already spent thousands in their cause, he would willingly pay the expenses incurred in the present instance, or ten times the sum, and was well able to afford it.— (Cheers.) After some further observations, Mr. Scales concluded by impressing on the inhabitants the paramount necessity of sending to the Court of Common Council five independent gentlemen, who would truly represent their— the electors'—interests. Mr. FORD differed with the Lord Mayor, when he said that politics had nothing to do with their proceedings there on that day. He maintained that many political questions, of great political character, come for discussion before the Court of Crmmon Council ; and it was desirable to them to send to that Court such members as would fairly represent their feelings and principles.—( Hear.) For his own part, he never would give his vote or support to any person whose political opinions were not in unison with his own.— (Hear.) The time was fast approaching when not only the Court of Common Council, but the Court of Alder men, would be called upon to give an opinion on a great measure of reform ; and therefore it was important that they should send only those who would fairly represent their sentiments on it, as well as other subjects. Messrs. Death, Ford, Combs, Christie, Bonningfield, Scales, jun., proposed, with appropriate speeches, Mr. Hoard, Mr. Negus, Mr. Saul, Mr. Parker, Mr. Tyars, and Mr. WlCenzie, as fit and proper persons to represent the Ward in the Court of Common Council. The LORD MAYOR put the question to the show of hands, and declared the election to have fallen on Messrs. Parker, Negus, Saul, Hoard, and Tyars. A poll was de manded on the part of Mr. M'Kenzie, when the Lord Mayor decided on taking one vote for each candidate on that night, and adjourning the proceedings until the next day, when each of th e canidates would have to go to the poll. The names of Messrs. W. W. Scales, jun., and Mr. Christie, were afterwards added to the number. Each of the candidates respectively addressed the elec tors ; after which other officers of the Ward were elected, and the Wardmote, at a late hour, was adjourned until this day. LA NGB 0 URNE WARD. SIR JOHN KEY'S EXPLANATION OF HIS RE TIREMENT FROM PARLIAMENT. The ten old members were unanimously re-elected. After the other business was gone through, a vote of cen sure was moved by Mr. Gibson, and seconded by Mr. Harwood, on the Lord Mayor, for having refused to call a Common Hall, to give the citizens of London the opportu nity of expressing their sentiments on the dismissal of the Ministry, and unanimously passed. A vote of thanks was then passed to Mr. Marchant, for his great attention, as Commissioner of the Sewers, to the local interest of the Ward. A vote of thanks was then passed on the old Com mon Council. A vote of thanks was then moved by Mr. Gibson, and seconded by Mr. Stubbing, to Sir J. Key, for his conduct as Alderman of the Ward, and for the manner in which be had discharged all his duties, which was unani mously carried. Sir J. KEY returned thanks, and entered into a long explanation of the circumstances attending his resignation as Member for the City of London. He said—lt was from no dereliction of duty—from no disappointment given to the expectations of my constituents ; but I fell a victim to one of the most disgraceful and vindictive conspiracies that had ever been formed against any individual, con cocted by a few rival tradesmen, jealous of the popularity I enjoyed for the effectual services I had rendered to the obtaining the passing of the Reform Bill ; and, like the Ephesians of old, exasperated that through my means the exorbitant gains which they had for years obtained from the public had for ever been put an end to. Some sixty years since an Act of Parliament was passed, that if any Member of Parliament, either directly or indirectly, sup plied goods either to Government, or to any person, with a knowledge that it was intended for Government, he should not only be obliged to vacate his seat in Parliament, but also be subject to a fine of 500/. for every day he sat there. Gentlemen, of the existence of such an Act of Parliament I was perfectly ignorant. At the period at which it passed it might have been a necessary Act, when a corrupt Tory Go vernment were in the habit of giving in private extensive or ders to their favourites at the most exorbitant prices, without any competition whatever, thus rewarding their subserviency by enabling them to realize, at the expense of the public, immense fortunes by their unjust and exorbitant charges ; but the case is very different now. Every Government contract—l refer particularly to that for stationary—is done by open competition. Before any contract is entered into, it is advertised in all the papers three weeks before, inviting every tradesman or merchant throughout the king dom dealing in the article required, to tender for it, and the person who will undertake the contract at the lowest price, always obtains it. The public, therofore, are materially served, when individuals possessing capital will undertake these contracts at low prices, as a very considerable saving is thereby effected. The Hon. Baronet then entered into various details, the object of which was, he said, to show that he had been the means of saving to the public, in the contract for stationary alone, nearly 40,000/. per annum ; and he declared that it was for this cause, and this cause alone, that he had fallen a victim to the shameful conspi racy which had been formed against him ; and concluded by thanking the Wardmote for the patience with which they had listened to him. This address was received most favourably, and the Ward adjourned. [FROM A CORRESPONDENT.] The Times some days since stated as an evidence of the change of public opinion, that in the Ward of Bishopsgate, which was described as being heretofore the rallying post of the Reformers, there would on St. Thomas's-day be 14 Conservatives started to turn out the Radical Representa tives. In another column will be found a statement of the proceedings at the wardmote. We are informed that some half-dozen persons, in their private characters honour.. able and influential individuals, as if stimulated by the en couragement of our contemporary, showed their f aces at the wardmote, where no sooner did their noses appear in the meeting than instead of being elected common council men, they were chosen inquestme!a and constables ; a n d th e prophecy of the Times as to their elevation to office has been realized in their appointment to the dignified station of nightly Dogberries and daily pot peepers. Mr. Tennant, author of " Anster Fair," and other works, has been appointed Professor of Oriental Languages in St. Andrews, in room of the late Dr. Scott.—lnverness Courier. THE KING OF THE CHIMNEYS.---At Runcorn the chimney to a soap manufactory has been erected, which is 72 feet higher than the famed M onumen t w hi c h, th oug h l a t e l y gilt, may now go and hide its diminished head. Trade in this country has a fit emblem here. Depend upon it the factory will overtop the proudest Corinthian column and the highest church steeple.—Literary Gazette. St. Petersburgh journals to the 6th announce, with out comment, under the date of Nov. 6, from Tauris, the news of the death of the King of Persia, Felk Ali Schab, who, as our readers are already aware, died on the 20th of October, at Ispahan. Exchange on London, THE SPANISH LOANS. (Concluded from The Sun of yesterday.) Mr. J. YOUNG wished to know if the writer, in speaking' of arrears of interest, meant to include all arrears ? Mr. WEEDING—The letter says nothing of arrears °I interest : it only says that in 1838 the passive,stock become active. This is entirely without prejudice to the period when the passive stock shall become active.—( Hea r ' ) Mr. COHEN wished to know if the writer of the letter meant to say that 12 per cent. in each year was to be pai d by the Spanish Government from the period that the passi ve interest became active ? The CHAIRMAN, after a momentary communication Whit Mr. Zulueta, informed the meeting that one-twelfth of the passive interest would be paid each year until the whole 0 5 redeemed.—( Hear, hear.) The following resolution was proposed at the 13st meeting : " That it is the opinion of this meeting that the termina tion of the present state of uncertainty, in which the Corte; Bondholders are placed, is a matter of paramount necessity, and that any further delay would be highly detrimental to tbeif interests. " That although this meeting do not recognise in the term s accorded to them by a recent Act of the Spanish Legislatur e ' that full and equal justic e t o w hi c h th e y cons id er t h e mselves entitled ; yet, considering that the validity of their claims 11135 been acknowledged, and being desirous of relieving the G ( '' vernment from any embarrassment in its financial operations, which the protraction of this affair might occasion ; this meek. ing deem it expedient to accede to the terms proposed, as ei plained in the law of the 16th of November last, in the confi dent belief that the urgent representations with which their consent will be accompanied, may induce the Spanish Minister to agree to sueh an amelioration of that part of the arrange' merits respecting the arrears of dividends, as the Bondholde rs upon every principle of equity and national faith are entitled to require." The following was the amendment moved by Mr. young " That the Act of the Spanish Government and Legislatu rt. for the payment of the for e ign d e bt, m ore p ar ti eu l ar ly in plac ing the arrears of interest in a passive form with re2ard to a certain part of that debt, was not a measure of equal justice ; and that until equal justice was done to the Cortes Bondhold ers, the Committee of the Stock Exchange be requested t°, continue their prohibiti on with res p ec t t o th e nego ciation a' new Spanish Securities in the English market." A very long discussion then ensued, in the course c f which Mr. Ricardo read the following letter : " 72, Gracechurch-street, Dec. 22, 1834. " Gentlemen—We have received by express from Madrid; of the 13th inst., the decree of her Majesty the Queen Reg° of Spain, for carrying into effect the conversion of the foreign debt according to the new law. The bonds to be issued bear interest from the Ist of November ult., and the first divi dend will be paid on the Ist of May next. " We hasten to give you this notice, in your Capcity a t s i agents for Mr. Ardouin. We shall b e h a ppy to give . r every assistance in our power, to favour the view of the Cv° - vernment, whose confidence and approbation we hope to s ecure! no less than that of the bondholders the m selv es , w hose inter est is so strongly recommends to our protection. We remain, Gentlemen, your obedient servants, " E. PAREJA, "P.J. de ZULUETA, „ " President of the Commission. " To Messrs. J. and S. Ricardo. Mr. YOUNG, in conclusion, stated that in proposing th n e amendmen the had been anxious only to advance the cono ° interest, and finding that the feeling of the meeting w as , against the amendment, he should withdraw it.—(cheer s./ After a few words from Mr. Goldsn - iid and Mr. Ricari°: the original motion was carried unanimously, amidst the loudest acclamations, which lasted for several minutes. 40 A resolution, thanking the Duke of Wellington for a , prompt application made in behalf of the Cortes bop holders, was then adopted nem. dis. Thanks we voted to Mr. Weeding and the Commit tee ., of Spanish Bondholders for their extraordinary exertions (/ ' behalf of the bondholders generally. The motion was C ttr ried amid loud cheers. Mr. WEEDING briefly returned thanks, and the meet illf adjourned. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, 1hm.22. FURVIVAL V. STINGER. t he This was an action brought by the plaintiff agains t b. late Sheriff of Surrey to reco v er d a m ages f or a lleged ha tl be ness of treatment in causing him to b e r em ove d from t debtors' side of Horsemonger-lane gaol to an apartmen,t:,, the felons side, and otherwise vexatiously o pp r essing P i o The cause has been tried twice before, and the facts been before the public several times in other shapes. the The Court was occupied the whole of today wit h neti trial, but on account of the number of witnesses to be C it was obliged to be adjourned till to-morrow. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Dzc. 22.4 RICHMOND V. MARSHALL AND ANOTHER. , yo In this case, which was not concluded yesterday we went to press, the plaintiff consented to a noneuit. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, DE C ' 22' Peter William Campbell Ilaro,y, a landing waiter at the Custom House, was opposed by Mr. Nicholls, on the P 5 of two creditors named Jackson and Holt ; he was Or ported by Mr. Nicholls, on the part of two creditors named Jackson and Holt ; he was supported by Mr. COO The object of the opposition was not the prolongation 1, the discharge, but to obtain an apportionment of the ins ° vent's salary towards the liquidation of his debts. It ' 1 peared that he derived a salary of 2001 . a year. He : 1 i ' ,1 5 ,„, offered his creditors 601. a year instead of going to P rls lis which was refused ; he now offered 301. a year out of s alary. The COURT ordered 401. a year to be set aside for t li° creditors. The insolvent was discharged. Oa ADVERTISEMENT.—To the dyspeptic patient, all persons suffering from indigestion, we can c onfident l Ypifig, commend a bottle of Norton's truly valuable Camomil e o d which we are quite certain will not fail to afford prompt effectual relief. So great, indeed, has been the suce o o f tending the use of these pills, that they have become °t be the most deservedly popular medicines, and it is muc hto ga lamented that a spurious imitation has been prepared bY! o ur torious quack, called Cockles, against which we fee l 1 , 40 " duty to caution the public. We have been assured by fe7 ear ty who had really been martyrs to indigestion for several ) st o and were compelled, from the weak state of their cli g e of organs, to abstain from every delicacy, that, by th e u f e c se tli Norton's Camomile Pills, they had in a few weeks Pe r icy recovered, which is the most convincing proof of their e'm as a tonic and strengthening medicine, BIRTS. On the 22d of April, at Canna o re East Indies, the ladY °or. Sinclair, daughter of Dr. Duncan, of Brussels, of a son. oe/ On the 21st inst., at Canonbury-square, Mrs. Robert C. " of a still-born male child. . - gl On the 19th inst., at Chesterton, the lady of S. Mariodin, .. of 40301 On the 18th inst., at Edinburgh, the lady of John Cuml, gu Esq., of ensol, of a son and heir. 1, 94 ' At Darrynane Abbey, the lady of Maurice O'Co nnell, M.P., of a daughter. EA' of At Castleview, county Cork, the lady of Barry Gregg , a sun. if r a n At Balrothery Glebe, the lady of the Rev. Courten a l A.M., of a daughter. 11 ' 14' At Doon, King's County, the lady of L. Dickinson, Esq . ' of a daughter. ifeee t. At Clontibret Glebe, county Monaghan, the lady of the able the Archdeacon of Clogher, of a daughter. ---- MARRIED. r it•O' On the 16th inst., at Guernsey, by the Rev. R. Poteng, 'clistili the Rev. Havilland Durand, A. M., Rector of St. illarysuesq., °` to Maria Caroline, youngest daughter of Peter iilaiogYY Clifton, in that Island. aeof On the 20th inst., at St. George's, Hanovcr-sq ll3 ,„ re h'mtag ' Cary Elwes, Esq., to Arabella, eldest daughter of "."- Heneage, Esq., and niece to Lord Yarborough. I, Esc.' On the 7th inst., at Chidoeck, Dorset, 'John Mit,hel.k R.N., of Peckham-park, to Miss P. B. Case, of Gliidoeo• wood' On the 20th inst., at St. George's, Bloomsbury, Th°rl'as late S' house, Esq., to Harriet Elizabeth, youngest daughter of the of B. Windsor, Esq. s(l. ' On the 18th inst., at Chesham, Bucks, Joseph Pa ler ' -c". Pernambuco, Brazil, to Miss Sophia Nash, of the former Pl4drie On the 20th inst., at Brompton, W. C. Aylon, Esq.' ,°efChaties Inn-square, to Lucy, the youngest daughter of the a‘ ‘, to Allen, Esq., of Market Harborough, Leicestershire . sq. , In St. eter's Church, Thomas Grace Geogheggniv'tboioel Frances Anne, elde s t daughter of John Purser, Esq. , °f ' .l , Castle. In Innisteogue Church, George Wynne, Esq., Royal flf(oiljreeri".e; to Anne, eldest daughter of Lieut.-Colonel and Lad,' Osborne. _____---------- ________ lED. e Fi' t On the 22d inst., at Esher, D Surrey, in her 2 6 th year, Arm i Holroyd, youngest daughter of John Holroyd, Esq. tote oi Ri o o n ja t n h e e ir l o s , t ag h e in d st 3 . 6 ,.at Hamburgh, Mr. John Schwieg er ' . t, l' ilf- On the 20th inst., Arthur Beetham, Esq., of Broad-stree. _,,,,05, geon, third son of William Beetham, Esq., of Stoke Newlaa," Middlesex. rn f Tl l ° ll° lk-r On the 21st inst., at Grove-place , Walthastow, . rnett, formerly of the Minories, in his 71st year. bter e l Ba On the lath inst., at Brighton, Charlotte, seco nd clang hr Charles Jones, Esq., of Stamford-hill, aged 19. . in On the 19th inst., at Miss Hawkes's , Clapham-common , kr itt, 85th year, Mrs. Alice Frankpitt, widow o f the late John Fran Esq., of Exeter. late 0 . C. On the 21st inst., Elizabeth Sophia , relict of the Director of tPhleowEdasent,lnEdisqa.,CoofmDpeavnoyn.shi re -place, and for 27 years a Ch a r les On the 19th inst., in Stone -buildings, Lincoln's Inn', Charles Holford Bosanquet, Esq. Barris ter - a t-Law, eldest son °' Bosanquet, Esq., of Rock, Northumberland, aged 36- , the late On the 10th inst., in his 22 d yea r, George, fourth son of William Mortlock, Esq. , of Meldreth, Cambridgeshire. relict of the On the 21st inst., at the Cass ino, Dulwich, .Anne, late Thomas Bainbridge, Esq., of Croydon Lodge, Surr ireeY, o :,,. et- On the 17th inst., at M ildrum House, Aberdeonshll quhart, of Mildrum. ..........!el ted and Published by RIURD O YO 1 .14 London: Pat The Sum Office, No. 112, Strand. sth., net ) , Ulan a. , LIRE 6th. ARCH s con tft p county 7thi th e l ea thi s Ai Bth. Mo v thank, i mpart -.......____ Set 1;la each 44 1011 i Depart jeStv' s (in (hit 0 to il to • ne w to ti verif the A' Ward; Decer n th e sa , Es q . , for the It Th a b, e (;, late I ability Th a Worsh tentio t!tenti, Tha and -EN Refor n Aroz cla The People tent posed Refort leclar. inte n d as a tln a co-afc 3(1._ that it the gr( eorisiti ( oi l A g., 4th. settati Thr HALF As Affid,r y de ire: sil Unc aVV thei; Ist. If t notice tnarke Genet If t hot ice Iler, a In z atate and a ll GE N o to the -....___ 0] Nept. t,p, 'erof Rb er 1 1111 v ‘ )1. ja