The Sun. — London, England, 1834-11-14 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. hardly repeat that these are mere conjectures. — Morning Chronicle. We congratulate the public on an important discc very made by a Morning Contemporary—" that it is The Ministerial chaos of France has terminated in a very strange sort of creation—it has produced a Ca binet of most incongruous materials—putting one in mind of Burke's illustration of a Ministry, in his own time, of different colours and violent contrasts—the fantastic combinations of a tesselated pavement, with here a bit of black stone, there a bit of white. Of a truth Louis Philip has proved himself a whimsical artist in the construction of this piece of political mosaic work. That it displays a fanciful genius in the contriver every body must admit. But the ingenuity of the work is much more striking than its apparent solidity. One thing France has gained by this Minis terial revolution. The Doctrinaire power which had so long overlayed whatever there is of public virtue, political talent, and patriotic principle in France is broken in pieces, like the statue of brass and clay. This Doctrinaire power had, during the whole of its arbitrary, dishonest, and contemptible career, the admiration and support of all the servile portion of our Whig press. The eternal trickiness, the serpentine policy, the anti- Constitutional tendencies, and even the hatred of impossible we can have a worse Chancellor of the Ex chequer than the Noble Lord who has lately succeeded to a seat in the Upper House." The Noble Lord took office in October, 1830, with an estimated surplus of revenue of 397,0001., but an actual deficiency to nearly that amount. In the March following, how ever, he took off— The duty on Coals £330,000 Candles 485,000 Printed Calicoes . :n 183° Hemp lOO,OOO Sundries in the Customs 125,000 En 1833 Tiles Sea Policies Advertisements Assessed Taxes 244,000 Raw Cotton Soap En 1834 Fruits, Oils, &c 300,000 House Tax 1,200,000 Amount of Taxes and Duties Repealed £4,689,000 The total revenue in 1831 was 46,424,440 Deduct the Taxes repealed as above This would leave, if the produce of the different taxes were in 1833 the same as in 1831 But the actual revenue 1833 was... 43,170,600 Which is nearly equal to the amount before the above taxes were repealed ; and the revenue of 1834 will fall little, if anything, shor t of that of 1833. We must also take into account that the expenditure, when Lord Althorp took office, notwithstanding great reductions made by the Duke of Wellington, amounted to £47,142,943 in the year ending Jan. 5, 1831 and 44,758,242 ... free opinion evinced by the Doctrinaires in the un ceasing persecution of the Press to which Louis Philip mainly owed his throne, did not deprive those wretched Statesmen of the sympathy and approbation of certain of our Whig Journals. for ourselves, we expressed the same opinion of them from the time their system was first developed that we do at present. Their two principal expedients of Government were the alarming the rich and timid classes of society by police-emeutes, and the extinguishing the source of intelligence which threw an inconvenient light upon their actions by in cessant prosecutions of the Press. In place of the Doctrinaires, France has got the ill-assorted composi tion of a Ministry which we have described as a whole, but which it is not very easy to describe exactly in its component parts. There is a fragment of the splendid empire of Napoleon in the Duc de Bassano, but not a splendid fragment. That is combined with a piece of the juste milieu system to which M. Teste, the new Minister of Commerce belongs, and who will not realise the anticipations of our political economists as to " free trade.' Then we have in the Minister for Foreign Affairs, M. Bresson, a representative of the intriguing and many-coloured policy of Talleyrand—in the Minister of War, General Bernard, and in Charles Dupin, the Minister of Marine, representatives of the Orleans system, which is not, though it affects to be, the system of honest patriotism or the charter. Nor is a shade of the republican wanting in this curiously cOnstructed'Cabinet, for we have it in M. Passy, the Finance Minister, though a very delicate shade, and this is commingled with the changeable hues of M. Persil's policy, who in one respect may be said to be unchangeable, and that is in his attachmnnt to power above everything else. The continuance of this minion of Doctrinaire tyranny in the Government must consi derably abate the exultation which the Press would otherwise have felt at the overthrow of the Ministry that had so long laboured for its utter destruction. The continuance of this man in power seems like a seal of condemnation on the whole Ministry. It causes us to have some doubts, which we hope may be dispelled, of the correctness of the report which gives the new Ministry the credit of intending to commence their career by the long-expected Act of Amnesty for poli tical offences. The prisons of France are now more crowded than they were at any time since the restora tion of the Bourbons, by the victims of Bourbon sus picion and tyranny. The Citizen-despot, with his cotton umbrella, has attempted to establish a dominion in France worthy of the iron sceptre of the Czar. This is the man whom Lord Durham, the present idol of the Radicals of England, embraces as a friend, or did embrace very recently. But Lord Durham, like the recreant King of the Barricades, has also prosecuted the Press. For our own part, we care nothing for the patriotic professions of public men, when we have an opportunity of judging of them by their actions, and by that test shall we judge the new French Ministry. —Morning Herald. The speech of King Leopold, last Tuesday, on opening the Belgian Chambers was quite silent as to the state of the negotiations for the settlement of the dispute with Holland. If it be compared with the address of the King of the Netherlands the other day to the States General, the Belgians will have little reason to rejoice. The announcement by his Dutch Majesty of the reductions to be made must be annoying to his late subjects, when they find that their war budget of 1830 is to meet with no diminution, but is only to be adjusted upon a more equitable footing. The allusions to the commercial state of the country are very scanty and very unsatisfactory ; congratulation there was no room for. In the way of promise, the railroad, which had just been begun in time, is the only thing that presents itself, and this was made the most of. But if King Leopold, on meeting his assembled people in the fourth year of their regeneration, had nothing to congratulate them upon, and little to promise in respect to their wealth or their commercial relations, he had a very satisfactory account to give them of the order that was established and maintained in their newly-created army, and the measures that are about to be adopted for putting that army upon a still more extensive and expensive footing. Moreover, a line of fortifications was to be immediately set about on their northern frontiers, in order the more effectually to cut them off from their ancient allies the Dutch, and render more improbable than ever an amicable adjustment of their international differences, from the continuance of which King Leopold's subjects have already suffered so deeply. But all this is not the only declaration of war which the King's Speech contained. Not only is an enormous army to be organized, and vast and ex pensive fortifications established for protecting his little kingdom from aggression from without, the enemy that is within his gates is also to be confronted with a new projet de loi. We are at a loss to understand what his Majesty can have been driving at in this part of his Address. The Belgians should be but too happy to encourage the countenance and ' sojourn of strangers from our own and other countries (their superiors both in political rank and social ad vantages), and not harrass them by legal importunities of the kind which were to be announced. The other topics of Leopold's Address are not more satisfactory than the statement of the finances is likely to prove to the braves Beiges.—Morning Post. The public are naturally anxious respecting the Ministerial arrangements which have become neces sary in consequence of the death of the late Earl Spencer, and the removal of the present Earl to the Upper House. All sorts of reports are in circula tion ; but we think we can assure our readers that no thing has yet been settled ; and indeed nothing can be settled till the return of his Lordship from North amptonshire. All, therefore, for the present, can be but conjecture. If fitness determine the changes, Lord John Russell will most probably lead in the House of Commons--retaining his present office of Paymaster of the Forces. The extensive Parlia mentary experience of Lord John, the attachment of the people of England to the family of Rus sell, his knowledge and acquirements, seem to point him out for the situation. An additional recommendation to a Reform Parliament, is the association of Lord John's name with the great measure to which it owes its existence, in consequence of the share which he had in framing the Bill and carrying it through the House. Neither is it new that a Paymaster of the Forces should lead in the House ; for Mr. Fox, afterwards Lord Holland, led the Commons while Paymaster of the Forces. We have alluded to the expectation that Mr. Spring Rice should have the Chancellorship of the Exchequer, for which his ability and industry peculiarly qualify him. It is not supposed t h at he will be thought of for leading the House ; and as there is no necessary connection between the two duties discharged by Lord Althorp, the choice will, probably, fall on Lord John Russell for one of them. Mr. Edward Ellice, who is a great favourite with the House, might have been thought of, but, unfortunately, the state of his health compels him to withdra w from office f9,-NA:T It is understood, we believe, that EarI 8 1 ) , laced at the bead of the Admi lty of' r c e, displaces Lord Auckland ; nd as we - believe th, is no foundation for the report ich has assioned- n is to him, it is supposed he be the sacs f Mr. Spring Rice. We need • 4 /, . ; NI 7 ` £2,384,701 saving per annum. It certainly does appear to us, that if we cannot have a worse Chancellor .of the Excheqiier than the Minister who has repealed nearly five millions of taxes and reduced the expenditure 2,384,7011., our next Chancellors of the Exchequer must do wonders. And yet we think it would puzzle our contemporary to point out how another five millions of taxes may be re pealed in an equal period, without diminishing the re venue ; and how the expenditure may be reduced fur ther two and a-half millions, without impairing the efficiency of the service. It must be borne in mind that the reduction amounts to one-sixth of the sum over which any control can be exercised. In giving the Chancellor of Exchequer credit for the above re duction, we do not wish to be unjust to the other Ministers, being aware that all of them have contribu ted, in their respective departments, to effect the sa vings of which the two and a-half millions are corn posed.—Morning Chronicle. We resume, as we were lately induced to promise, the subject of the Parliamentary Paper lately printed by order of the House of Commons, giving the report and evidence before the Committee on the subject of the " Civil and Military Expenditure in,the Colonies We concur heartily in the recommendation of reducing that expenditure to the utmost, which the Committee, very creditably to themselves, annex to the report; the subject matter of which, indeed, very opportunely and wholesomely, obtrudes the whole important question of retrenchment on our consideration. The more we examine the details, the more we are satisfied with the necessity of a searching and unsparing application of the pruning knife to the profuse and unwarrantable expenditure to which along period of profligate jobbing and mismanagement has perniciously accustomed the nation. We say we cannot too often remind public men of what they are too frequently apt to forget amidst the clamour of interested dissension, that the nation demands retrenchment and relief from fiscal burdens. The memory, indeed, of public men, seems to be of an extraordinary fugacious description on this most special point of the nation's welfare :—they will prate and quarrel about any other question; but theques tion—the almost solely vital question of retrenchment— they seem, with miraculous unity of sentiment, to avoid adverting to—" Oh no I we never mention it." If pub lic men forget,'however the memory of the nation is more tenacious in this most essential particular, viz., that the pledge on which the Grey Ministry came into power, on the total wreckof the iron-bound and Conservative struc -1 ture of the Wellington Administration, was retrenchment and Reform—that is to say—retrenchment, as a matter of equally vital necessity as Reform ; as a matter of equal consequence in public estimation as Reform, and not to be postponed to any question of Reform, general or particular, or in any respect whatever, It may be replied, and with great truth, that many re trenchments have been made, many taxes abolished, modified, or shifted to advantage ; but that is no rea son why more should not be effected in the same way —why further retrenchments should not be made—why more duties should not be reduced—more taxes taken off. Look at the Stamp tax on newspapers—on paper —on glass, and on many other products of British in dustry, and the extent of improvement and employ ment of which they are susceptible, and then assert that there is no further room for salutary reduction and beneficial relief ? If timely attention be not paid to the public will in this respect, the nation will grow at last tired of Legislative promises and delays, and in the same manner as they rose as one man in calling upon Lord Grey to carry the Reform utea.sure, so will they combine in one united call upon some future Neckar to cut the gordian knot. l - .We often hear, political men and public writers making a great mystery of the evident want of sympathy occasionally exhibited by the great body of the people towards the persons, and the interests of the individuals composing sections of the legislative and administrative portion of society. Our readers will probably imagine that we refer to the above marked characteristic of public feeling ex hibited during the late conflagration of the Houses of Parliament. Certainly it was a singular subject for contemplation to observe that, while a minute handful of public men were dissolved in sentimental sorrow on the occasion, and making a clamour as if chaos or docrmsday itself were come, the people—we say emphatically not the mob, but the people—were looking on Ole affair with consummate contempt, or apathetic indi.fference. Why was this ? The answer con veys a salutary admonition. Because they want practical relief from their burdens—because promises of relief have been made to them again and again which have not been kept—because flattering tales have been told to their ears which have not been held good to their hearts. They share this sentiment of sagacious indif ference with IC sop's ass, who, when urged by one master to fly frorm another master—whom the first re presented as an enemy—refused to budge a single step, observing, that it signified little whether it was Jack or Martin (i. e. Whig or Tory) who laid on the intolerable burden, and applied the stimulating lash. The people might think, and indeed might think them selves warranted to say, " we have no part in David ;" and it will be a wholesome warning for the two Houses in future, to march a little more rapidly and consistently with the public will, in point of fiscal and other re forms, or the time may come when the concluding part of that scriptural sentence may be pronounced as the popular watchword, " To your tents, 0 Israel."— Morning Advertiser. A ROBBER SHOT.—On the night of Wednesday week, Mr. Hurley, a farmer residing at Stork-green, near Moopham, Essex, was aroused from his sleep about 11 o'clock by an unusal noise about his premises, which he could not ac count for otherwise than by conceiving that depredators were present. Although at the advanced age of 60 years, and no one near him but his wife, Mr. Hurley did not suffer his fears to unman him; but, arming himself with a gun, be went in quest of the cause of the alarm. Finding his hen roost open, and thinking it had been robbed, he approached the door, and thrust the muzzle of the g un th roug h t h e aperture ; upon th e moment of doing so it was seized hold of by some person within, and Mr. Hurley being pulled forward, a scuffle ensued for the possession of the weapon, during which Mr. Hurley received two desperate blows on his head f rom a bl u d geon : the butt-end of the gun being in the grasp of M r . H ur l e y, by sheer accident went aff. A t this moment it was wrenc h e d from his hands ; it being quite dark, he immediately retreated to his house. He there armed himself with a sword and pistol, and went to protect his property, desiring his wife to cl ose an d fasten the door after him. Ag ain advancing to the hen-roost, he was astonished to see two men dragging a third aw a y, whose clothes were on fire, and w h o was groaning in apparent agony. Mr. Hurley then, and not till then, was aware that the discharge of the gun had wounded one of the depredators, and he deemed it wise not to interrupt the design of his com panions of conveying him away. W hen assistance arrived, the wounded man was found in a turnip-field, deserted by his companions. He was recognised as a man named Davey, one of the most noted poachers in Kent. He lies in a hopeless state.—Maidstone Gazette. THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 1834 mons was intended for that day, and that Mr. Denison had mistaken the day, supposing it to be Wednesday instead of Tuesday. The original summons was altered in that respect. The constabl required that the deponent should immediately appear before Mr. Denison. He complained of being suddenly called upon to answer so serious a charge, and said he would appear the next day before the Magistrate. The constable went away, and in the after noon returned with a summons for him to appear next day before the Rev. Mr. Blanchard, at Middleton in the Wold, a place fourteen miles distant from the deponent's house, and more than eleven miles distant from the place where Mr. Denison was accustomed to perform his magisterial duties. The summons stated that Walker Fentiman had charged James Cockburn with having pointed his gun at the said Walker Fentiman, and had fired off the gun, whereas the said James Cockburn had sworn that he did not point the gun at the said Walker Fentiman and fire it off in the manner alleged. The summons in the first in stance required Mr. Fentiman to appear before Mr. Deni son at Pocklington, but it was afterwards altered to Mr. Blanchard's, at Middleton, in the manner already stated. It could not fail to be obzerved here that the Magistrates ought not to have issued such a summons, for that perjury was no breach of the peace, and consequently was not an offence that called for their interference, and certainly did not call for it in such a hurried manner as to justify the haste which had occasioned the Magistrate to forget, in the first instance, the day of the week and month, and after wards to alter the hour required for Mr. Fentiman's appear ance, and the place at which he was to appear, so as to make the distance many times greater than it was before. There could be no doubt that this conduct on the part of the Magistrates was an instance of hardship, irregularity, and oppression, from which every one would, unless the circumstances were fully explained, infer that the Magis trates were not actuated by the best motives in the world. The deponent swore to his belief that what was done was for the purpose of occasioning him trouble and expense. The Learned Counsel then went at length into the remain ing facts, which have little or no interest, except to the par ties concerned, after which, Mr. Justice WILLIAMS said there were facts in this case of which the Court could by no means approve. Among the rest was the change of the place at which the deponent was to appear before the Magistrates ; but he agreed with the rest of the Court that there should be something dis tinctly to bring the case within the rule alluded to.—Rule refused. COURT OF CHANCERY, Nov. 12. IN THE MATTER OF LONG, AN INFANT. In this case Mrs. Sandys, the mother of the infant, prayed that an order of the Vice-Chancellor, appointing Dr. Cooper, of Evesham, in Worcestershire, the guardian of the infant, may not be confirmed, but that, on the contrary, it may be discharged altogether; and that Mr. Thomas Gasby, of Tavistock-straet, Bedford-square, may be ap pointed such guardian. There was a counter petition on the part of Dr. Cooper, praying, among other things, that Mrs. Sundys may be prohibited all access to her daughter, the infant. _ The infant is the sole child of Mrs. Sandys, who had a fortune of 18,0001. when she married Mr. Long in 1820. This fortune was settled in such a manner that no provision was made for the wife in the event of her surviving her husband, and on the death of Mr. Long, in 1821, the Court, upon the petition of Mrs. Long, varied the set- - . tlement in such amanner as to give Mrs. Long a power of settling 5,0001. on her daughter, who is now about thirteen years of age. In 1824, Mrs. Long married her present husband, Mr. Sandys, and a few years after, in consequence of some misunderstanding between her and Mr. Long, the father of her first husband, Dr. Cooper was appointed guardian of the daughter. Mrs. Long, in about two months after this appointment, which was in July last, went to Shipton-on-Stour, where her daughter is at school, for the purpose of seeing her, but was much sur prised to learn from 11Iiss Snow, the mistress of the esta blishment, that Dr. Cooper had prohibited all intercourse between the mother and her daughter. Mrs. Sandys im mediately applied to her friends, and at her and their in tercession an opportunity was afforded her to see her daughter. This interview took place, however, in the pre sence of Dr. Cooper, who, in his affidavit stated that Mrs. Sandys attempted to carry her daughter away from the school, an attempt he was obliged to resist ; while Mrs. Sandys on her part alleges that the doctor unnecessarily assaulted and even bruised her. The fact seemed to be that Mrs. Sandys.did intend to remove the child, and that the doctor, having intimation of her intention, gave orders that the mistress of the school should take precautions to prevent it. Mrs. Sandys now alleged, as one of the grounds of complaint against the Doctor, that, although he was al lowed 1001. a year for her daughter's education and main tenance, he placed her at a school where the terms for board and tuition were only 221. a year, with a few shillings For extras. Sir C. WETHERELL argued at some length that although nothing could be imputed to Dr. Cooper which derogated from his character as a medical man and a gentleman, still that as there was no imputation on the character of the mother, it was not fitting that he should continue the guar dian of the child after the unhappy misunderstanding that had taken place. The daughter, too, wns exceedingly anxious that another guardian should be appointed. The LORD CHANCELLOR (without calling on the Counsel for Dr. Cooper to reply) said that the 'objection of the in fant to her guardian was rather in his favour. There could be no doubt that she would prefer a guardian who spoiled her by indulgence, or neglected to discharge the duties im posed on him. In his Lordship's opinion no case had been made out to justify the removal of Dr. Cooper from the situation of guardian to the infant. Still, however, he saw no reason for complying with that part of the petition of Dr. Cooper which required that the mother should not have access to the infant. Some discussion took place with respect to costs, and it was at length agreed that the costs of the petition of the mother and guardian should stand against each other, and that the infant should pay her own costs. JUDGMENT.-GIBLET V. HODSON. This was an appeal from a decree of the Vice-Chancellor argued on Tuesday. In 1828 the butchers of London formed a Society for the purpose of giving pensions and otherwise providing for decayed members of the trade. In the following year they extended their views to the erection of almshouses, and Mr. Knight, one of the subscribers, gave them a piece of land at Farnham Royal for that purpose. The society took possession of the land, but the conveyance was not executed when in 1830 a Mr. Greaves bequeathed to the members a sum of 5,0001., to assist them inbuilding alms houses. The land was conveyed to the Society the month after the testator's death ; but the next of kin being ad vised that the bequest came within the statutes of Mort main, brought the question before the Vice-Chancellor, who pronounced the gift on that ground to be void. His Lordship now said that he found no express provision in the Statute of George 11. against bequests of money to be laid out in building or land. There was a doubt whether the omission had been accidental or intentional ; but the construction of the Courts had been against it, on the ground that it was impolitic to take such sums from com merce, to place them in the hands of Corporations. His LORDSHIP himself inclined to the some opinion. Looking to the circumstances of the present case, and ap plying to it the principle of former decisions—namely, that the proof of showing whether the buildings were to be erected on land already possessed by the Society, or to be afterwards purchased, lay on the party claiming the money —be thought it clear that the testator had in no manner pointed out the land to be used, but, on the contrary, had left it to the Society either to build on Mr. Knight's land, or purchase other land with a portion of the money. The Society had not even obtained a legal right to Mr. Knight's land. The Society were, however, fully justified in mak ing the matter a subject of appeal, and for th at reason, as wel as that the heir-at-law had obtained a sum of money which the testator never intended for him, be thought the costs of the whole proceedings in this Court and the Court below should come out of the fund. The deposit also to be returned. His Lordship rose at a quarter to five. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov. 13. BROWN V. SHEVILL. This was an action to recover the carcase of a bullock which the plaintiff claimed as his property, and which had been seized by the defendant under a distress for rent due to him from a man named Woodham, in whose premises it was found. The cause was tried in the early part of this year, at Guildhall, when the question raised for the consi deration of the Jury was, whether the carcase was really the property of the plaintiff, or belonged to Woodham, and was claimed by the plaintiff for the purpose of preventing it being liable to the defendant's distraint for rent. The Jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, finding that, in fact, the carcase was his property. On this finding a question of law was raised, whether a carcase in a butcher's - shop, though belonging to a third person, was not to be consi dered to be distrained for rent due from the butcher? On a former day a rule had been obtained calling on the plain tiff to show canse why the verdict he bad obtained should not be set aside and a nonsuit entered, on the ground that the carcase was to be considered as the property of the per son in whose shop it was found ; and was, consequently, liable to be distrained for rent due from that person. Mr. F. Pommeic now showed cause against the rule, and contended that the verdict ought not to be disturbed. Mr. DAWSON supported the rule. Lord DENMAN could not distinguish this case from those where cloth was sent to a tailor's, or materials to a weaver; and was, therefore, of opinion, that the carcase here was protested, and that the rule must be discharged. Rule discharged. BAWLER V. BROWN. This was an action for work and labour. The plaintiff was an attorney, the defendant had been his client, • The plaintiff had omitted to take out his annual certifi cate until within two days of the end of the legal year men tioned in the Stamp Acts, so that the business performed by him for the defendant had been performed while the plaintiff was without a certificate. The case was tried at Guildhall, before Lord Denman, when a verdict was given for the plaintiff, subject to a motion founded on the above objections to the plaintiff's right to recover. Mr. CARRINGTON having obtained a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a nonsuit en tered, Mr. PETERSDORFF now showed cause. This case was one of considerable importance as regarded the compulsion on attorneys to take out a fresh certificate at the moment their previous one expired, and it raised the general ques tion, whether a certificate taken out towards the end of the year had or had not a retrospective effect. In a case re cently decided in the Court of Exchequer, it was deter mined that a party was not liable for an action to recover the penalties under the Act on this subject, if he had taken out a certificate before the expiration of the year. Mr. CARRINGTON supported the rule.--Rule discharged. THE KING V. TWO JUSTICES OF THE EAST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE. Mr. PoLLocK moved for a rule to show cause why a cri minal information should not be filed against these defend ants for misconduct in their offices. The Learned Gentleman spoke in an unusually low tone of voice, so as to render it very difficult to hear what he said. As far as we could collect, the circumstances under which he made the appli cation were these :—A Mr. Walker Fentiman (the depo nent) had laid an information against a clergyman of high rank and his sons, whose names it was not necessary to mention ; that proceedings were had upon that information, and they were convicted ; and, in consequence of that, os he believed, the injustice of which he now complained had been practised towards him. On the morning of Tuesday, the 7th of October, the constable of Pocklington came to him and summoned him to appear before Mr. Denison, a Justice of the Peace for the riding, and answer a charge of perjury. The summons called on Mr. Fentiman to appear before the Justices on Wednesday, the 7th of October, Mr. Fentiman observed that there was a mistake as to the day in the summons, and that must mean Wednesday, the Bth of October. The constable accordingly returned with it to the Justice, and then came baek and said that the sum- THE KING V. BIGGS. Mr. PLATT recalled the attention of the Court to this case, and said that the defendant was now in Court, and he prayed their Lordships to proceed with the case, as the young gentleman had been so long in confinement. The depositions taken before the Rev. F. Curtis were then read. They stated that, as Owen and another man were passing the waggon of the defendant's father, Owen said to the waggoner, who was riding on the shafts, " You are a pretty fellow to be riding on the shafts in that man ner ; I've a good mind to fetch you off!" The waggoner answered, " That's more than you can do." On which Owen stopped, and picked up a pebble-stone, when Master Biggs fired his pistol towards Owen. Both the deponents swore to hearing the charge from the pistol strike the hedge within two feet of them ; but one of them said he did not think it was the intention of Master Biggs to injure them ; that they were five poles from the waggon when the defend ant fired the pistol. Owen admitted that he bad spoken of the affair at a public-house on the evening of the same day, and had there laughed at it. The defendant himself de clared before the Magistrates that he fired the pistol in the air only to frighten the men. The COURT, after short consultation, ordered that the defendant should be discharged on four persons entering into recognizances of 501. each fur his appearance at the next Maidstone Assizes. The sureties were at once given, and the defendant, a Lad of about fourteen, was discharged. _ FENTUM V. LORD FALMOUTH. This was an action for injury sustained by the erection of a dam, and the cutting of a canal, tried before Mr. Jus tice Alderson, in which a verdict had been entered for the plaintiff, with 251. damages, with leave to enter a nonsuit. Mr. JUSTICE, on behalf of the plaintiff, now applied for leave to amend the pleadings. The declaration had set forth that the plaintiff was in possession of a certain water grist mill, but it did not contain the words " close or closes thereunto appertaining." The Learned Counsel proceeded to cite several authorities in support of his application, which he admitted was rather a novel one. The COURT observed that it had no power to amend the pleadings in the present instance. When the alteration did not materially affect the circumstances of the case the Court might interfere, but such was not the case in the ap plication now made. The Learned Counsel might, how ever, if he thought fit, take a rule to show cause why a verdict should not be entered for the plaintiff on the first plea, without damages. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Nov. 13. FALSE IMPRISONMENT-SMITH V. OWEN. Mr. GUNNING, for the plaintiff, stated that this action was brought to recover compensation in damages for an assault and false imprisonment, to whigh the defendant had pleaded a justification, and would, therefore, according to the rules of the Court, be entitled to call witnesses in sup port of that justification before the examination of witnesses on the part of the plaintiff. Mr. BUTT then called several witnesses on the part of the defendant, from whose evidence it appeared that the defendant kept the Weavers' Arms public-house, in Crown street, Finsbury, and that on the evening of the 21st of July the plaintiff went there in a state of intoxication, and, on defendant's refusing to serve him, conducted himself in a very riotous manner, until defendant at length sent for a policeman, by whom the plaintiff was taken to the station house, and on the following morning brought before Mr. Broughton, the Magistrate, and discharged, the defendant not appearing to make good his charge against him. Mr. GUNNING, for the plaintiff, submitted that the de fendant bad failed in proving his justification. Verdict for the defendant. ADMIRALTY COURT, Nov. 13. The second session of this Court was held yesterday, Sir JOHN NicuoLL presiding. But two cases appeared on the list. THE NEPTUNE. The proceedings against this vessel have been in pro gress for a considerable time. This morning application was made to the Court by the King's Advocate to decree wages due to the second mate, who was discharged from the ship at the Cape of Good Hope, the vessel being on her voyage to India with troops, &c. The COURT, after hearing the affidavit read, directed the proceeds to be attached in order to pay the claim of the seaman, amounting on the balance to 251. Sir JOHN NICHOLL presumed the parties directly inte rested in the residue of the proceeds were aware of the ap plication, as the seaman had made his claim later than others. The REGISTRAR said the parties were aware of the appli. cation. There were two other seamen coming home from India who would also have to make claims. The wages were directed to be paid. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, Nov. 13. Mr. Henry Whiting, formerly a clerk in the Bank of England, was opposed by Mr. Cooke on the part of a gen. tleman named Pocock, and was supported by Mr. Wood. roffe. • The insolvent was before the Court on a former occa sion, when his case stood adjourned for him to consider whether he would consent to give up to his creditors a por tion of his retired allowance from the Bank of England, or have his petition dismissed. The Learned Commissioner BowEN informed him that it never could have been the intention of the Legislature to relieve him, unless he gave his creditors an equivalent. 'He had been thirty years a clerk in the Bank, and hav ing met with an accident he retired on an allowance of 230/. a year, which he had enjoyed for some time. His principal creditor was Mr. Pocock, whose debt arose on an annuity, for which the insolvent had become security for his son-in-law Mr. Taylor, who some time ago became a bankrupt. It was complained that his salary had been re presented to Mr. Pocock as being 8001. a year ; the annuity was greatly in arrear. The insolvent, it was now stated, had come to terms ; he had agreed, by rule of Court, to pay his assignee, Mr. Pocock, 40/. a year out of the annual sum received from the Bank. _ The insolvent entered into the rule, and was discharged THE STORM IN LIMERICK.—LOSS OF LIVES.— Thursday night and Friday morning it blew a furious gale of wind from the north. The shipping at the quays have not suffered damage, but several private houses have been stript of their slates, and many windows damaged. A sail-boat, corn-laden, is swamped near Cooper's Turret, below the Pool, and two more are sunk near Beagh Castle. A brig has also capsized in the creek of Kilrush. There were at least a dozen persons on board the small sloop and sail-boat sunk near Beagh Castle, and the exertions of the Rev. William Waller, Mr. Low, of Bushy-island, and Mr. Ross, of Castleview, were highly praiseworthy, when the forlorn state of the crew and passengers was observed from shore. All on board were saved but two, who perished from fatigue and exhaustion. The survivors were taken ashore in a boat which the Rev. Mr. Waller had launched in a very boisterous sea, and the crew of a brig in the river saved those on board the second sail-boat when she sunk. They were all treated with the greatest kindness and humanity by the families we have mentioned.— Dublin Morning Register. POLICE INTELLIGENCE MANSION-HO USE. Yesterday a man named John Carter, who had been mas ter of a Newcastle vessel, was brought before the LORD MAYOR, charged with having forged the name of Captain Pescod, of the ship Hunter, a Newcastle trader, to two or ders for goods. Mr. Barrow, of No. 91, Lower Thames-street, oil and colourman, stated that Captain Pescod had been in the habit of dealing with the house for many years. On Sa turday last the prisoner called at the shop, and, stating that be was carpenter to the Hunter, presented an order, signed "J. PescOd," for a quantity of white lead and another ar ticle. The prisoner said that his name was William Thomp son, and witness having no suspicion whatever of a trick at once supplied. him. On Tuesday the prisoner again ap peared with an order of a similar kind, and obtained ano ther supply ; a third time the prisoner came with his cus tom, but some fears being entertained that all was not right a little inquiry was made, and the prisoner was found to be a regular trickster. Captain Pescod said that the orders were not his, nor issued by his direction. He had known the prisoner for merly in the trade. The LORD MAYOR—Prisoner, what have you to say for yourself ?—Prisoner—Not a word. The LORD MAYOR—I shall commit you for trial for this offence. Prisoner—l can't help it if you do.—Com mitted. Stephen Davey and Mary Murphy, and Peg Murphy, her daughter, were charged with having beaten a decent fellow who works at Billingsgate. The quarrel was produced by that eternal promoter of feuds—gin. Mr. Davey and Mrs. Murphy were in part nership in the fish line, and the former was now and then in the habit of taking more fish for his money than it fairly purchased. In this practice he was aided by a knack he had of making two flounders occupy the place of one, so that by the time he concluded a morning's purchase in the market, his profits were considerable. He however on this occasion took too much gin, and laughed so much in dab bing the flats together, that the robbery became too pal pable, and he was obliged to make immediate restitution. The complainant happened to .be on the spot when the trick was detected, and because he laughed at the matter, Mr. Davey took up a cod which lay on a form, and knocked the man over head and heels with it. The poor man's eyes were both blacken'ed, and his nose bled profusely, and it was no very great qualifier of his pain, that he was told he was the first man that was ever knocked down with a lick of cod's head. The LORD MAYOR asked what part Mrs. Murphy took in the business ? The complainant stated that Mrs. Murphy he really be lieved wanted to make a fish of him in earnest, for when he was down she told Davey to souse him in the dock. The police then interfered, and Peg Murphy, who is a powerful young women, used her fists in such a manner that more assistance was required. Davey, upon being handcuffed, wanted to try the temper of the metal upon the head of the officers, and failing in that, endeavoured to smash them upon a post. In fact, a more desperate set-out had not been seen for a long time. Davey said that it was the gin that acted, and not he, for he knew nothing till he was fast asleep in the station house. Mrs. Murphy merely tried to protect her partner, and Peg Murphy said it wasn't the way in her country for a daughter to see her mother kilt without avenging her death. The LORD MAYOR ordered Davey and Mrs. Murphy to find bail, but discharged Peg upon the ground that what she had done she did in defence of her parent. Peg—Please your Lordship, I wish you'd let me take her away from these spalpeens. The LORD MAYOR—If you don't depart quietly I shall mend you to keep your mother and her friend company. MAR YLEB ONE. Yesterday, Joseph Fisher, butler in the service of Major William Wallace Ogle, of No. 13, Bryanstone-square, was placed at the bar, charged with the following daring and violent assault on his master : Major Ogle (who appeared with a green shade over his eyes, both of which, as well as his nose, were terribly bruised and blackened) deposed that the- prisoner had for some time past been in his service as butler, and had always conducted himself with propriety till the precedinc , day, when complainant observed while he was waiting at. dinner that he was very tipsy. He immediately ordered him to leave the room, when he assumed an attitude of defence, and resolutely refused to do so. He then took him by the arm and led him out ; but had scarcely let go of him be fore he up with his fist and struck him (complainant) a tre mendous blow in the face, which was in consequence (as might be seen) very much disfigured. He did not wish to press the charge, as the prisoner would lose his situation ; but he thought that some slight punishment ought to be in flicted on him as a caution to him to behave with more respect to his masters in future. The prisoner, who was very sorry for his misconduct, was fined 31., which having been paid, he was discharged. Emma Floyd and Ann Prideaux, two piling women, fashionably attired, were placed at the bar for re-examina tion on a charge of stealing a very handsome embroidered child's frock belonging to Mr. Blake, linen-draper and general salesman, No. 88 and 89, Edgeware-road. It appeared from the evidence of Mr. and Mrs. Blake that for several months past the prisoners had been in the habit of coming to their shop, always to g ether, sometimes twice a day, and after looking over articles of various de scriptions, purchasing something to the amount of one shilling, or eighteen-pence. Having lately missed property from the shop to a considerable amount, they suspected the prisoners to be the thieves, and accordingly determined to keep a sharp watch on their actions. On the afternoon of Thursday last the prisoners as usual entered the shop, and requested to look at some stockings, which Mrs. Blake reached down from a shelf behind, and while turning round again saw the prisoner Floyd in the act of concealing the frock above-mentioned beneath her shawl, but which, on being perceived, she adroitly passed to her companion. Mrs. B. then told them she Iliad long suspected they were thieves, and had now detected them in the fact, upon which the prisoners begged to be forgiven, and offered to pay any sum required. A police-constable was, however, sent for, who conveyed them to the station-house. Police sergeant Elliott of the A division took the pri soners into custody, and on searching their lodgings, No. 7, Shouldham-street, Lisson-grove, he found a small leather bag containing 276 duplicates, a handsome tortoiseshell ' comb and several fancy articles now produced. There were no fresh charges aganst the prisoners, who seemed to have made Mr. Blake their victim, nearly all the duplicates above mentioned relating to property belonging to him. The pawnbrokers present, some of whom came a long distance, here produced upwards of 100 different pledges, consisting of remnants of silk, muslin, silk handkerchiefs, women's shoes, stays, &c. ; and in most cases, one or other of the prisoner's were recognised as the pawner in the assumed names of Watts, Wilkins, and Coulson. Mr. Blake identified the whole of the articles produced as his property. The prisoners, who by the advice of their solicitor, Mr. Flower (of the firm of Alderman Harmer and Co., Hat ton-Garden), declined saying anything, were further re manded till Saturday, in consequence of the non-attendance several other pawnbrokers, against whom summonses were ordered to be issued. _ THE CHIMNEY SWEEPERS' ACT.—Yesterday this office was crowded to excess by members of the " sooty tribe," in consequence of some of the trade having been summoned for crying " sweep" in the streets, contrary to the recent Act of Parliament. Charles Cox, an old sweep, was the first one called on. Daniel Boswell, one of the United Society of Master Chimney Sweepers, heard the defendant call " sweep" in Warren-street, Fitzroy-square, on the 16th ult. Defendant.—Yer Worship, I don't deny the fact. If its true I am wery sorry for the circumstance. Here he handed in a summons which had been served on his son, and wished both cases to be decided together. The evi dence was precisely the same. Mr. SHUTT (to the son) —Are you guilty or not guilty? —Young Sooty (hesitating)--Neither von nor fother. Old Cox (to his son) —Charley, vy don't you chirp up and tell his Vorship wot he axes you ? Young Sooty.— Vell, then, I worn't crying s'veep at all. The witness Boswell did not wish to press for a convic tion, as the elder Cox had since become a member of the Society, and conformed to its rules. Mr. SHUTT.—Then on the costs being paid the sum monses are dismissed. Old Cox.—Good for ever bless yer Vorship, yer vife, and family. It is in contemplation to effect a junction between the Danube and the Rhine by means of a canal. The distance i s 23i German, or about 90 English miles. USEFUL HINT To MISSIONARTES.—A former Pastor of the parish of Logie, distinguished for simplicity of manners, when assistant to the celebrated Doctor Henry, hap pened to meet the Doctor on the Castle Hill of Edinburgh, during the French war, when the following dialogue took place :—" What ha'e ye been doing in the Castle, Mess John ?" " I've been about my master's work, Doctor—Con verting the puir deluded bodies, the French prisoners." " A most orthodox employment—of course ye understand their language ?" " Na, ne'er o' word of French can I speak." Astonishing 1 how did you get on ?" "To tell you the truth, Doctor, it was no easy matter—for the first time, when I tried to be serious with them, they jeer'd and made a fule o' me 1 but I fell on a better plan the day; I ordered in a great bowl o' punch, and we a' sat round it, and drank to one ani ther—they leugh and I leugh I—and ye ken, Doctor, the Lord works Ws an mirk." _ ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATIOr4. Jn Sunday night, a little after nine o'clock, the re?, a pistol was heard near St. Thomas's Cburch,ja `4 crr e ° Frederick-street. There was at the same time Watch," and Emery, the watchman, hastened to tb tortirtbt He was told that a man had been just shot, an d tb`. r ol assassin bad fled, but whither no one could tell. li e , 51) ,,rcb; his Af rattle, and having got assistance, Made dilige nt - be VI After some time, a man answering the description be received, was discovered croucbin the in a ee llar A I.vay, in Park-lane, and on being ' seized, be r l ie ; 14, cii ietlY• Don't murder me, don't kill me, and I'll go had whaler's hat on at the time, and was ,dressed in 3 , 11 0 jacket, greatly too large for him. S.tatiP captain of the watch, coming up at the time, white waterproof hat, and asked him if it wa ci s ue bs t i oni: 0 1 1 nied that it was, and refused to answer a n y subsequently, however, admitted that the bat wa s hi c' r e? on being removed to M'Lean's public-house, Lowe4r r e rick-street,d tb he was recognised as the ma n who bad ' pis attol the saor. The history of the dreadful transaction is this . risA Friday afternoon a young man, calling himself 14°40 put up at M'Lean's house. He described himself a" at of I u . st arrived from Dublin, but gave no further ae c , trr his business or object in coming. He had with Oa "bafs yelling bag, filled with books ;rid linen, and 00, 6 ,, e g ue, label was engraved " Fawcett." His manners an4l"-ario seemed at variance with his apparel, and it was re' o dort , that o there was something odd or strange in 01i ftlr" On Saturday he went to bed at three o'clock in t n ' tio d3l. noon, and remained there until half-past twelve ° ll , l ' r ,g rs ' then came down stairs, and dinner being,_nearly r e- i ' M‘Lean asked him if he would dine. He answere° Co'v negative, adding that he was not hungry. pressed, however, ho took a bowl of soup, and a' b e , 4 p r y it, he said, " I will now take dinner : that: soup me an appetite." Ro#, After dinner he drank a single glass of punch, ,1001' went out. Soon after six o'clock he returned, sati;Ott the kitchen, and appeared to be somewhat tipsY . two hours after some sailors who boarded ineeov,„i came in, and this was the first time they han.,le'` The conversation was about supper, and the sail ° '''lK that they would have potatoes and herrings. lt rs ' o'V r assented, and gave her servant-maid sixpence to ° A b er some herrings, The girl, whose name 0 Ellen , t°, o f s master's son by the hand, and, accompanied bY be ailors, named George Smith, went out to exeeur c lisr",; tress's orders. When they had got near to °l e nt o the distance of about three perches, Smith fel t I t 'illVA °. tread on the heel of his shoe. His shoe came P r ' n d and, saying " Avast heaving there," he turned r°ll,.j;t7,t saw the stranger, Morrison, behind him. a I)oll.. e pir ; again," said Smith ; " I will," was Morrison's ri.„' which both faced each other. Smith requested Pin,o" back. Morrison refused, and desired Smith " adding, that if he did not he would sho ot h'i', 0r i to se' words to that effect. At this Smith attempted him by the collar, but he drew, or rather j ump was 1) , 5 pulled out of his pocket, what the girl thought w $ d She rushed between them, caught Smith by the ,31;eft at the instant, the other fired. He then ran' 1)1 pistol away, and was caught, as already O at" 0(1 watchman. Or r ) Smith, when shot, did not fall, but was veldlls was removed to M'Lean's. Surgeons Taylor ari, o ia were soon in attendance. Mr. Taylor, on fira k t actf4 man, discovered a circular wound just above t' e t ,ll parently inflicted by a pistol-ball. The w ifrli A'ik probed, no trace of the ball could be discoverea.., time afterwards the patient complained of a patii; r side, a little below the last rib. Mr. Taylo r rej f ,a 4 cut down upon a small tumour which he extracted the ball from the depth of an inch and of the surface. of On Monday the person calling himself Tj,l l.l •osf l y placed at the bar before his Worship the '''''3 l ,o o " l rf . PETER BOURNE, Esq. He looked pale, hage r so 9s Of t. jected. He wore the coarse sailor's jacke d his baird appeared to have been recently shaved off, and :f o il Y: 0 )0 cut quite close. He seemed to be about Went/ t i o p," l ,o of age; and he leaned, as if ashamed of his sit, na ,; o 4 l the d front of the bar. Shanahan stated the e irc ; 0 l b. - etailed above, and exhibited the pistol, gold watch, the paean-ticket of another, a thr ggtr , Ae . s a e'll e iPTe .' and its contents. The pistol is a double-barreLfl, rO,:sV barrel was charged with powder and ball, the °`", e sr 4 charged. There was a cap on, and in the Pris () % r opl ie ;; were found three similar caps. The dagger Vil-rsevot Turkish ; the blade was what is called tvav eu to tine, T and the point to the extent of one inch ' f o s r l gfr The watch was out of repair, and the ticket wa s . e t'os lar watch, pledged at Fannin's, Marlborough-stri, lin, d on the sth instant, for 2/. 25. 4d. On th e , r t ,it istinctly written " Fawcett." The books ' ce i, e olie f and German, and were all nature to cre,a t e e o il aa thr° they were used for the purpose of acquiring' P r'r M'Lean's servant girl was also examin e " ; ' t the medium of the French. s tate d, soner, A tin ( but soner, on being asked what was his name, b eg. t't 40 0 0' being pressed, said " Morrison." t ents MAGISTRATE—Are the bag and its e°n ( 1/ Prisoner—The are ISTRATE—Is your name Fawcett? Man 9 Pri fe'Per o d tatingly)—No, my name Mison. MAGISTRATE—Where is did you come from :? (0 0 (hesitatingly)—From eand. MAGISTRATE—Wha Ir t l part of Ireland? Pri6°rle Ot a long delay)—Dublin. P r ' s MAGISTRATE—What are your friends n year l , o o, They are much more respectable than I now a t' til i " Mr. Taylor was then examined, and stated that'eoli,d the wounded man, he hoped, would recover, be i i il4 l take upon himself, by any means, to renounce at' danger. The prisoner was consequently rerilailae terday. r oo f / At about six o'clock yesterday morning,- t , l l,:tlt i o, was not expected to survive mar, minutes, lA"' 01 9 - 0 . of the day he rallied, and at a late i hour in the e e bor ecnotnesridtaeirneeddbnyf his Al to be better, and 6' han d , HERRING FISHING.—A very smart 0-100,/, ing has sprung up in Lochfine, b •g to tit... 4 s or, Mier the fishermen have been ' ut prevented owing in a r from prosecuting it. The fish are of a superier citi o the curers are in hope of doing something rtbtaes their lee-way. A considerable number of barrels:4o br it been cured, and are finding their way into the Il i. ' t he FOX -HUNTING.—Lord Elcho has a cu o take' fro us Fo H for the season. He some time in the lower part of aeuturlis2l-e'ercitsrv°l,l4 plenty of game in the breeding Berwicks hire.coverts,and the e h ij itety hounds promises fair for a grand additin to this "ins peifs).V His Lordship is at present brushing UP the country, and in the end of the present week li e be d 0 1 "'cir ing in earnest with the fine sporting comitY,„,%es c os Capital sport may confidently be anticipated• . n t °, l l3 t rf e ts . in all parts of the countr. The hounds ar e 1- I;slit s ` he be tion ; the stud of horses belonging to the esta b- of the fresh as kittens, and the urbanity of them a ster in siv Ai upon all occasions, and his gentlemanly and se r t ' s lOpt i y haviour in the field make him deservedly a oil From the number of first-rate sportsmen , w" - li cit .° TY taken lodgings for themselves and stabling for di „ ili a l of t" gude e town of Dunse may this season be call.,e ib , v brsid. f ssedly was in days of old, " The Melton i'l ° beeti 5 , 4 4 North." In short, the demand tabling 11,a51,. that there is likely to be a deficiency.urs Lord P,; e li verr, d ed new ones ; others are doing the same, Lorded ' - e cl ri are getting- their old uninhabited houses con f fortable lodgings for that useful animal the horse belL„, blishments cannot fail to be of great benefit t tle, t ft 4 expe cte o o lye ij, the community. Among those who are lowing celebrated sportsmen :—Sir David Da t i rci ' 'k 0 1 :1 ton, Sir David Kinloch, Mr. Fletcher, . I% '' r . t *%! ca rt Buchan, Mr. M'Dougall Grant, &c &c. .1 1 e rpo 9 Mr. Campbell of Saddell means to ;aka up t eed Greenlaw, in order that he may be able to V a li, Duke of Buccleuch and Lord Elcho.---KeleeP.- BIR THS. thr oe „i On the 10th inst., the lady a eie Rel. P low daughter. On the 12th inst., at Haverstock-hill, HamPs t i l e o J. Parry, Esq., of a son. On the.29th ult., at Middleton Recto r y , OS of to o P the Rev. R. Pretyman, Precentor of Lincoln, ((looser> On the 12th inst., Mrs. John Ba rcla y , daughter. ----------"----- osei MARRIED. ... DIP ! e t °I oTfa o tHh n aiem t k li : e 13th inst., at St. Michael's, Highg awi ding b `_ ,A , toeadf Highgate. James Sussex, to Mary, secona,, iitet,o On the 11th inst., at Brighton, Jaxnes 1-Ic9e i r l e o 9 ' i of Do'ctors'-commons, eldest son, of John 13c),yfo ,to I youngest daughter of the late Captain Bright. , i tfec:dr On the 11th inst., Mr. J. Cary, of St. Jarnes,74ol). lotte, eldest daughter of Thos. Goldney, Esq. , °' f 1 _,,tlif D IE D vtolo' A On the Bth inst., Harriet, the wife . of Thomas ,f 0 I , ' Lindon-grove, Kensington. On the 10th inst., at Walsin ham, the Rev. ./ 4°- fr' aged 57. g ' 0, v l/ Re s t 0000 On the 12th inst., the infant son of Geo. Re. a t t he ~ On the 9th inst., in Cavendish -square, Barrie 410 1 i it , ter of Frederic Reae, Esq. .. AO , . 1 0 On the 4th inst., at Norwood, Mrs. Mary, ut i . if,4 fr late James Burton, Esq., of Bethnal-green , in ''' t, oe" On the 7th of September, at Retreat Settlement' , Jamaica, Miss Eliza Allardice. o' l 'ol l ~, geld, .0 On the Bth inst., at Harwich, Susan IA .1 1 n aro ss) late Rev. William Whinfield , B.D ~ late vicar of R r e• t Crao for'l court-cum-Harwich, Essex, aged 65. On the 11th inst., Mr. Joseph Cable,. el - ,ic:, Ray-street, Clerkenwell, ironfounder, aged Si. ja b er nf On the 6th inst., at Glandour, near Cardioan, aver Charlotte, wife of Mr. Charles Curtis, and I‘ I‘ Isaac Hensley, Esq., of Clapton, Middlesex• it f all) .------,................—...------... nO London : Printed and Published by AIV., I ii. 14 The 1 5 '.iii Office, No. 112, Sts."--