The Sun. — London, England, 1834-11-27 00:00:00

seizes upon office to do all that he condemned. And this most immoral conduct—this glaring lack of prin ciple—is not merely to be pardoned, but to be a ground for our reposing more confidence in him than if he were an honest man—more confi dence in him than in a Ministry sincerely attached to the policy he detests, but espouses from ne cessity I But how is the Duke to effect his reforms ? He must effect them either through Reformers or anti-Reformers. Tha Times holds out, as the pe culiar advantage of his advent to power, the convic tion which will be forced on the fanatical and unrea soning Tories, that further resistance is useless. In this case, the Reformers are to have the benefit of the Tories, to make reform doubly sure. But assuming the readiness of the Duke of Wellington to fly in the face of all his principles, and to confess that it is all one to him, whether "lie acts on his principles or against them, what reason have we for presuming on the acquiescence of the Tories ? They were taught to yield to the concession of the Catholic claims, be cause they would thereby convert an enemy into a friend ; that the Church of Ireland—meaning by Church the abuses of it—would thereby be strengthened. They were told that they would give away , nothing material, and gain in re turn most important advantages. But the Tories and High Churchmen, with whom abuses in the State and in the Church are everythina—r-the very breath they live on—without which they die, are not such dolts as to support a policy which is to deprive them of all that is dear to them. The Reform must be always to them worse than the pestilence. The Reform then must still be effected by the instrumentality of members sent into the House of Commons by genuine Reformers. What drivellers then must Reformers be, having the power in their hands of allowing only honest and sincere Re formers to remain at the helm, were they to repose their confidence in unprincipled men, the consequence of which might be, that these men, on any favourable opportunity occurring, would seek to take advantage of it to destroy the Charter of their liberties 1 The Crown is in possession of great powers ; and if bad men arc suffered to wield those powers, who knows how soon, through foreign alliances and acts abroad, the nation may be precipitated into dangers and difficulties, which may aid the designs of wicked statesmen at home ? No, let us risk nothing when nothing need be risked. Who, because a tiger may not strike his fangs in him, would choose to trust himself in a cage with such an animal ? By Reformers alone can the Duke do any good to the nation ; but as Reformers can obtain the good without the Duke, they would be madmen to risk the good on the chance of his doing it at the expense of his conscience. But the Times can command three fourths of the people of England to follow it, and the Times says it would trust him. The business is done. Out upon the impudent braggart ? Who ever trusted the Times? The Times has often had the tact to fol low the people of England. There is no surer way of having counsel received, than when a person counsels what is already determined on. The Times appears influential when it goes with the people. Whenever it has set itself against the people it has been nothing. It could not obtain votes for Mr. Babbage, at Fins bury, at either of the two last elections. Indeed it has hardly ever supported a metropolitan candidate who has not failed. But let us hear the insolent braggart : " Then how must we act by the Duke of Wellington Show him that he must reform, or write and vote him .out of office ; for all of which we are well prepared : to the whole of which, in the face of England, we sternly bind ourselves, and those, comprising three fourths of the people, who do us the honour to be guided by us. The Duke says he will reform ; and we believe him. If he break his word—on which we do not speculate—away goes all our support from under him." Mighty well I So the people of Eng land must act in defiance of the most common rules of prudence, and trust a hollow man who sets his prin ciples at defiance, to gratify the Times, on the security of the Times withdrawing its support from him. 0, no ; the people of England will prefer to have a guarantee in their own hands—they will trust neither the Duke nor the Times. The low Billingsgate of that journal, so often applied indiscriminately to the best and the worst of men, would be a small compen sation to them for the mischief which the Duke would soon do, if left in the possession of power. One word The Times offers this excuse for its flagrant inconsistncies--" That we have praised public men is true ;:atid afterwards, for good public cause, accused them. h that inconsistency ?" But it is impossible that the same journal which terms a statesman wise one day, and the next a blind dolt—who tells us one day that he was all his life famous for being profoundly ignorant, and the next that he is an able and experi enced Minister, can have given their evidence sincerely in both cases. When we hear a witness swear at the Old Bailey that lie saw a man steal, and then swear that he aid not see any such thing, we set him down as a cand;flate for the pillory—and though he may have perjured himself for the mere pleasure of com mitting perjury, and it cannot be proved that lie took money, all sensible persons will come to the same con clusion on this point nevertheless. But, quoth the Times, " the Duke says he will reform—and we will believe him." To whom has he said this ? Under what circumstances, and for what purpose ? The Duke may by some ambiguous or equivocal declara tions have furnished our contemporary with an excuse for his apostacy, when seeking the benefit of his advo cacy—but the people of England will require some better evidence of this change of his Grace's views than mere hearsay evidence, to which the convenient belief of Printing-house-yard is attached. We doubt not, however, that the people of England, who have not the same rsasons for confiding in the Duke, will resist and punish in a way to be felt (for our contem porary can be made to feel), the unqualified arrogance of this insolent braggart, who thus impudently lays claim to be the guide of three-fourths of the popula tion.—Morning Chronicle. The country is tired of speculating, and anxious to come to facts. In the meantime the Duke of Wel lington does not appear to be employing the interval which must elapse before Sir Robert Peel's return, either so much to his own or the latter's advantage as he might do. Were we to judge, for instance, from appearances alone, especially from the character of the very few and marked persons who are reported as being associated with the Duke in his " provisional " undertaking, we might infer that his object and inten tion is, if possible, to form exclusively a high Tory anti-reform Government ; while, on the other hand, giving him credit for only common sagacity, we should be entitled to assume that such an intention must be as improbable as its fulfilment would be found to be impossible. But then why give his opponents this advantage—an advantage of which they are evi dently availing themselves every. where ? It is true that the Standard, which may be looked upon as an organ of the high Tories, if not of the Duke of Wel lington himself, begins to see the danger and impolicy of this line of reserve. "We agree," says our Evening contemporary, "with the Times, that it is impossible for any Minister to remain three months in the Govern ment, except as a Reform Minister. We will go fur ther, and say that every future Minister must be bound, not merely by the letter of the Reform Bill, but by its equity and spirit, as that spirit was illustrated in the speeches of those who propounded the measure and supported it." Except that we do not exactly see why the speeches of individuals should be referred to as a text-book upon the occasion, this declaration, coming from the quarter it does, is highly satisfactory, and only wants the stamp of complete authority to render it entirely so. But hitherto this demi-official avowal (even if we are authorised to deem it such) is more than counteracted by the very names of those by whom the Duke has been as yet surrounded, and by the lan guage held at several meetings in various parts of the country, where hatred of reform, and of the Reform Act in particular, is openly and unequivocally avowed- It may be said that, on the one hand, it is unfair to judge of any public man by the indiscretion of his ad vocates, and on the other, that the Duke of Welling ton has as yet had no authentic official channel through which he could communicate to the country the prin pies of his Government ; and that, in addition to this, the political creed of the new Administration must, like the Administration itself, be in abeyance till after Sir Robert Peel's return. This may be very true, but more. THE SUN, LONDON, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 1834. 1 the question, can there lie anyth'ng mare palpably re voltmg to common sense or to obvious policy, than an a ttempt to bolster up the interest of the new Ministry by an open acknowledgment like this, that it is a sub ject which will not bear discussion ? Does Mr. Winchester really suppose that he serves the Duke of Wellington by gagging the respectable inhabitants of London, and preventing any declaration of senti ment on the part of a great municipal body, with regard to the political character of the Noble Duke, and the prospects of the country under him ? Why, there is nothing so favourable to popular dissatisfaction as a refusal to let the people freely and unreservedly exa mine whether they are dissatisfied with or without jus tifiable inducements---there is no such provocation to clamour as a prohibition to speak. To us, who have reflected on these matters, and who have surveyed the condition of the kingdom quite as diligently and anxiously, and withal as disinterestedly, as any alder man among them, there seems nothing half so desi rable as that every man in the empire who can under stand the simplest political reasoning, should have every possible light afforded him for judging like a rational creature of the causes which have led to the existing state of inconvenience and embarrassment, and for estimating on something better than factious or se ditious grounds the chance of its removal by the com pletion of the Government looked for at the Duke of Wellington's hands. Truth and justice, fact and prin ciple, must be gainers by being submitted to the test of public investigation, and the more frequent the ap plication of that test, until the controversy shall be finally composed, the better. The Lord Mayor, or any other functionary who restrains the free expression of their opinions by respectable citizens, especially in their aggregate form of constituted bodies, only ensures the prolongation of gross ignorance, and of the murmurs which so naturally spring from it. If the Duke of Wellington's (or Sir R. Peel's) Government will not stand, what it ought to be capable of standing, the con flict of public feeling and opinion which its announce ment has raised, how, in the name of wonder, will it bear that appeal to the whole constituency of the em pire, which current rumours allege to be meditated by a dissolution of Parliament ?. Sure we are that the good sense of the Duke of Wellington must be affronted by this vulgar quackery appertaining only to the by-gone boroughmoncr ° er times, and that his Grace can have no objection to throw himself fearlessly on the people. So it appears that O'Connell has found in the pros pect of a general election, a new field for the deve lopinent of his peculiar tactics. He once again pre tends to fling the repeal question overboard, and to be satisfied with Reform Candidates on this occasion, for the sake of " uniting all shades of Reformers," and defeating the common enemy. Were there no ulterior object in this proposal, that is to say, were O'Connell an honest man, it might, by other honest men, be freely received and acted on. But what is the case ? If the Agitator has spoken truth in declarations a thousand times repeated, the creation of a separate Parliament, not the free election of a United Parliament, is the sole panacea for Ireland. The United Parliament, as being the instrument for this end, must therefore be so con structed and so adapted, as best to facilitate the avowed and final purpose of this arch conspirator. He will, therefore, strive to bend the united efforts of the Irish representation to the overthrow, right or wrong, of the new Government, without ascertaining its prin ciples, without waiting for its measures—and why ? from the hope of restoring to office those who have already listened to him: with a simplicity more than prudent—who have already buoyed him up into an insolence menacing to every constituted power—who have treated him as if he were an independent state, uncanopied by the British throne. The strongest Government for the United Kingdom is that which O'Connell most heartily dreads and deprecates. The weakest, most credulous, and vacillating statesmen, are those whom lie will labour to set up instead of them. His notion of popular representatives for Ireland therefore is, that they should be no better than tools of a miserable and wicked faction—a fac tion of which he is himself at once the hand, the head, the trunk, and moving spirit. This band of implements he will bring to bear, not against abuses, not against grievances, not in favour of good govern ment, or of that which is so esteemed amongst our selves, but it will be employed as a battering ram_ for a single purpose—namely, for the exclusion of certain persons from office—those persons of whose firmness, decision, and sagacity, it behoves the disturbers of the peace of Ireland, and the intriguers against British connexion, to stand in most reverence and salutary terror. The momentary waver of the repeal question, therefore, by O'Connell, is nothing better than a knavish and hollow trick, for the sake of resuming the project at a more convenient hour—and of turning the representatives elected on professions of reform, to the future furtherance of that iniquity of which he now affects to hold out the indefinite postponement. We would advise the patriotic and constitutional friends of Ireland to be wary of any pledges which may be tendered to them at the suggestion of that smooth and unprincipled hypocrite, lest such promises may be converted to uses for which those who make them are at present ill prepared. In the meantime, we recommend the Duke of Wellington—or whoever may be Minister—to keep a watchful eye and a tight hand over him to whom Ireland is indebted for the moral retrogression of the last 15 years.—Times. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Nov. 26. upon this writ. The question was, whether the demurrer was filed in sufficient time, according to the practice of the Court, to prevent the attachment issuing for want of an answer. Mr. KINDEUSLEY, for the defendant, contended that the time for the filing of the demurrer, so as to render it effec tive, extended till the hour at which the Court usually sat, namely, ten o'clock, and that this was the practice always acted upon. Mr. SIMPKINSON, for the plaintiff, contended that the attachment was perfectly regular. The defendant had fallen in the pit which he had dug for others. He had de layed filing his demurrer in order that the plaintiff might be prevented from obtaining an injunction this Term, by rendering it impossible for the demurrer to be set down for hearing. He now found, however, that he had delayed too long. Lord LYNDHURST consulted with the clerks in Court, who were of opinion that the attachment could be issued the moment the clerk's office was opened, and his Lordship said that there could be no disputing that the plaintiff was justified in issuing the attachment, which was in every re spect a good attachment. The motion must, therefore, be refused with costs. Mr. KINDERSLEY then moved for leave to give notice of motion for to-morrow, for the purpose of having the de fendant's demurrer received and set down for hearing, upon purging his contempt by paying the costs of the injunction an this application.—Leave granted. Several motions and petitions of no public interest were disposed of, and the Court rose at four o'clock. CONSISTORY COURT, Nov. 26. TREVENYAN AND TREVENYAN. In this case an allegation alleging adultery against Mrs Trevenyan was admitted by the Court. PRESLYN AND PRESLYN. This was a suit for divorce promoted by Charles Pres lyn, Assistant-Surgeon of the 63d regiment of foot, against Anne his wife, on the grounds of adultery. The parties were married in England in 182.8. In 1833 Mrs. Preslyn eloped from Dublin, where her husband's regiment was quartered, with a Mr. Carnegie, and on being traced to London they were found residing at Hatchett's Hotel, co habiting as man and wife. This was the ground stated for the institution, of the suit. Dr. BURNABY, on the part of the wife, had no opposi tion to make to the application. The Court admitted the allegation, setting forth the adultery. COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, Nov. 26. SIR G. DUCKETT AND CO.'S BANKRUPTCY. A meeting of the creditors of the banking firm of Sir G. Duckett, Morland, Sir F. Bernard and Co., was held to-day, for the proof of debts, and the declaration of a fur ther dividend. Debts were proved, during the day, to the amount o: 5,400/. The total amount of debts proved against the joint estate at previous meetings is 153,3481. in 377 proofs, which, with the debts entered to-day, make a total of proofs against the estate at present entered upon the proceedings of 158,740/. The dividends already declared amount to Gs. 11 d. in the pound, which have taken 10,345/. to liquidate. The divi dend which it was resolved to announce to-day will not ex ceed sd. or 6d. in the pound. Further dividends will be de clared. The proceedings were then adjourned. METROPOLITAN CENTRAL COURT. OLD COURT. John Ellis, a respectable-looking young man, late confi dential clerk to Messrs. Cubitt and Co., the extensive builders, stood indicted for stealing on the 11th of October the sum of 6001., the property of his employers. Several witnesses on the part of the prisoner, stated it to be their opinion that since the death of his child he had not always been in his proper senses. Mr. CLARKSON informed the Court that in addition to those persons he had twenty witnesses to charaeter. The RECORDER observed that after what the prosecutor had said it would be needless to call them. He then pro ceeded to sum up the evidence very minutely to the Jury, and entered at some length into the law on the subject of insanity, that in all cases where the individual was capable of judging right from wrong_ he, for any offence which he might commit, was amenable to the laws of the country. The Jury, after a short consultation, found the prisoner guilty, but strongly recommended him to mercy on the ground that he was at the time labouring under a derangement of mind, in which recommendation the pro secutor joined. In the course of the afternoon, on the Grand Jury coming into court with some bills, Mr. Orme, one of the county magistrates for Middlesex, informed the Court that they had been waitinc , for upwards of half an hour for per sons to come and prefer bills, and, as there appeared t o be no person ready to attend, he trusted the Grand Jury would be discharged. Lord DENMAN—Is there any person in custody against Which bills have not been presented ? Mr. CLARK—A great number, my Lord. Lord DENMAN-.Gentlemen, we cannot expect the en tire of the proceedings to be quite perfect as yet ; but it is very possible that, after this sessions, you will not be kept waiting. Mr: ORME—Perhaps, my Lord, you will permit us to adjourn until to-morrow. . . . Mr. Justice PARKE—I understand that, in the course of a quarter of an hour, the Mint will bring ten cases before you, and therefore you will have plenty to do. Lord DENMAN—We all have a public duty to perform, and if the Grand Jury were adjourned over until to-mor row, it would be very difficult to get all the persons toge ther who are in attendance as witnesses. You can adjourn, if you wish, for an hour. Mr. ORME—We wish to adjourn until to-morrow, for several of the Grand Jurors are Magistrates, and have other duties to perform. Mr. HEDGER, the foreman—My Lord, I have no wish for an adjournment. Nor I, my Lord, exclaimed another of the Grand Jurors. Lord DENMAN—Although you have no business before you at this moment, I have no doubt you will have sufficient in a short time. The Grand Jury then retired, and in the course of the afternoon several times re-entered the Court with true bills. In the course of the day Mr. Sturgeon, the barrister, applied to the Court to order some place of accommodation for Mr. Cooke, a student at law. Mr. Justice PARK—The Court has no power to order any accommodation for the law students. Mr. Sturgeon—My Lord, have you not the power to or der some place for the students ? Mr. Justice PARK—We have not. I know where the place used to be, but that is now removed. Here the conversation dropped. A true bill for felony was found against Reuben Martin the pugilist. still it is no answer to the advantage which a tota 1 silence gives to his Grace's opponents—a silence which, as far as prudence will permit, cannot too soon be broken. It has been suggested that this object might be effected through the King's answer to one or more of the Addresses which are in the course of presentation, in reference to the present important crisis. But to these etiquette, we believe, precludes any answer being given, except to the very few which his Majesty is bound to receive upon the throne. Mere etiquette has no great claim to our respect at any time. At all events, it should not stand in the way of an ob ject of so much importance as that of enlightening the people as to the future policy of the Government, and that especially on an occasion when the absence of that information is taken advantage of by its opponents in the way we are witnessing.—Morning Herald. It would be idle to tell our readers, after the fashion of some of our contemporaries, that no Ministry has yet been formed—that almost all the great offices of state are in the hands of one man—and that nothing will be done until Sir R. Peel has returned, which, we have been informed, will take place on Sunday week. The present Government, if Government it may be called, is allowed, even by its most strenuous advocates, to be merely provisional; and provisional, in every sense of the word, it will, we doubt not, prove. If we have not wholly mistaken our man, Sir R. Peel will see enough in the present state of the country to com mand, not only his usual caution in the acceptance of office, but to deter him from having any thing to do with it. Long odds have been already offered, but not accepted, even by those who possess the greatest confidence in the versatile talents •of the Right Honourable Baronet ; and we doubt not that, when our Sunday contemporaries have pour ed their broadside of honest and independent fire into the fragile timbers to which he might have been inclined to trust the last chances of Toryism, he will see good reason to allow the bark to drift at the will of wind and wave, knowing that nothing can bring it into port except one of those extraordinary visitations which do some times occur, but which, at the present mo ment, there is not the slightest reason to apprehend. The ground on which the Tories took office, and hoped to retain it, has, as we stated yesterday, been cut from under their feet—there is no division among reformers—there is no disunion—there is no opening by their differences of opinion upon matters of reform for Tory intrigue to work additional misrule and additional mischief—to stop the wheel of reform—or paralyse the progressive march of public opinion upon all necessary public reforms. No, not the slightest — from one end of the kingdom to the other, whether it be in Scotland or in Ireland—in the manufacturing or in the agricultural districts—there is but one voice, in which all other voices are hushed—but one sentiment, to which all others are subordinate. That voice calls for the suppression of all the differences of opinion upon points of reform, whatever may be their excellence in theory, or their importance in a political point of view—and that sentiment is union. The Tories see and feel that sueli is the case, and they are, as well as an exalted personage, greatly disappointed, if not mortified, and outrageous against what they term an invasion of the prerogative of the Crown. Now we most sincerely respect the prerogative of the Crown, as a just and proper right bestowed upon it by the people for their benefit—but we do equally re spect the original power from which it sprung, as well as the right of the people—the mil lions against the one—to express their opinion upon its exercise. The Tories deny that the pre rogative has been exercised, because no Ministry has been formed ; but is it not apparent to all that Lord Melbourne, not having resigned, or having signified a wish to resign, either on his own part, or on that of his colleagues, the body and life of the intended fUture Ministry is fully shadowed forth in the appointment of the most staunch and determined anti-Reformer of the age to fill nearly all the offices of Government, until a person of similar principles, and equally entitled to public confidence, has returned to his native land, and been welcomed with the warm reception which awaits him ? We throw out this hint for the benefit of a Magistrate whose intellects, we understand, have been so clouded by Tory mist, as to prevent him from seeing that those who confer a right are not unlikely to retain some rights for themselves, as well as to exercise them ; and who, if we are rightly informed, will, on the first mention of prerogative, or dismissal of his Majesty's Ministers, take up his mace—(not his bed) —and walk away. A certain popular assembly is, however, pre pared, we hope, to act upon the defensive, and to make known its opinions, whether the mace be present or absent.—Morn ing Advertiser. Bristol has taken a noble step in the cause of pa triotism. The promised meeting of its Association for the Support of the Established Church—that is, for the maintenance of the Protestant religion in these realms—was held yesterday, and the resolutions adopted afford a just specimen of the sentiments which are strongly felt in every quarter of the country, and require only such an example to bring them into full and vigorous action. 'Without an inconvenient delay of our publication it is impossible for us to present to-day a detailed report of the proceedings ; but we cannot for a single day omit to mention that so gene rally was the desire felt by the respectable inhabitants of Bristol and its vicinity to attend the meeting, that hundreds of applications for tickets were left unsatisfied. Adopting the usual mode of calcula tion, it was supposed that the building in which the meeting was appointed to be held would contain about 1,500 persons ; but so immense and urgent were the solicitations for admission that a fresh ar rangement was devised, and with the exercise of much ingenuity accommodation was contrived for 2,000. These facts speak volumes. But the resolutions which were passed are still more decisive. They ap pear in another column ; and we hope every one who reads them—and that will be a great majority of the people of the United Kingdom—will contrast the ardent, generous, and devoted zeal and loyalty which they embody with the low discontent, anti-religious rancour, and base self-I:literested trickery, which pervade the attempts of the enemies of religion to overthrow the Established . Church. They contain no one sentiment that is not based upon truth, wisdom, and virtue ; nor one but what is expressed with that manly and fervid eloquence, which the high importance and pressing nature of the subject demands. But again we refer our readers to the resolutions them selves. They will speak better their own lofty merits than any language we can hope to employ. Considered in itself this meeting is of great importance, but its value is doubled when we regard it as an example to the rest of the country. It conveys a powerful ex pression of the spirit of the great mass of the intellect and respectability of the second city in the kingdom ; and presents it in such a way as must produce in every grade of society, from the Prince to the peasant, wherever loyalty and religion have existence, the high est gratification and the warmest sympathy.—Morning Post. - - - Mr. Littleton has by this time quitted Ireland, never to return—a circumstance which no human being can possibly regret ; no, not even the Right Hon. Gentleman himself. No man can continue to like an office, his incapacity for which every day and every hour must p roc l a i m , no t only to others but to himself. The state of Ireland tells a dreadful story of misrule and mismanagement, and we hear that the state of Mr. Littleton's office affords an equally striking exhibition of idleness, incompetency, and inattention. A more difficult or important situation, in times like the pre sent, does not exist than the Irish Secretaryship. Who ever accepts it will have an arduous task to perform. He must be clear in head, brave in heart, and firm in principle ; and yet, all this being requisite, we think there is as little difficulty in pointing out who is the fittest man to fill it in the new Government as there was in deciding who . was the worst qualifi e d f or it i n the old one.—Morning Post. The Lord Mayor has been p lea s e d to reject the prayer ,^f the . • • requisition presented to him by a depu ,!immo n a Common Hall, for con tation of citizens to be adopted in sidering th e measures which , 7 v a fair the present sit ua ti on of the country. ~A_ and reasonable cause has been ruined by indiscreet supporters, ,and as we have not time to mince our phraseology, we must be excused for saying that his Lordship's act is that of a shortsighted simpleton. Without affecting to argue the constitutional right of MURRAY V. BARLEE. The plaintiffs were the solicitors of Mrs. Barlee in cer tain legal proceedings, and they filed the present bill for payment of their bill of costs out of her separate property. A decree was made in their favour, and the bill of costs was directed to be taxed. Upon the taxation more than one-sixth was taken off. Sir EDWARD SUGDEN now moved that the costs of the taxation should be paid out of Mrs. Barlee's estate. His HONOUR made the order, subject to any observa tions Mr. Girdleston, who was for the defendants, might have to make to-morrow. COLNAGHI V. DARTON. Mr. KEENE moved for a special injunction to restrain the defendant from selling a paint of " Lord Eldon, taken from life upon stone," upon an affidavit alleging that it was pirated from a print, the copyright of the plaintiff, after the celebrated picture of his Lordship by Sir Thomas Lawrence. The prints were handed up to his Honour. The case excited a good deal of amusement in the Court, several of the Bar desiring to see their old master, who was certainly not improved in his new appearance. • His HONOUR, after comparing the prints, said, " You won't know him ;" and seemed not at all satisfied that the piracy was made out. Mr. KEENE observed the dress was in every respect imi tated, even to the watch-key ; and the eyebrows could not be mistaken. It was plain the main design had been copied, however ill, though with some colourable variations. The VICE-CHANCELLOR—Does Mr. Colnaghi swear that the public would be deceived by the defendant's print ? Mr. KEENE—He does. The VICE-CHANCELLOR—He is a better judge than I am. How foolish purchasers are. As the affidavit is po sitive you may take the injunction. Mr. KEENE then made a similar application respecting a piracy just published by the defendant of the celebrated print of Sir Robert Peel, the property of the plaintiff. It was said many thousand copies of the spurious print were lately circulated through the country. It was, if possible, a worse likeness than the former, and scarcely to be recog nised but for the inscription underneath, " Sir Robert Peel, Bart., taken from life on stone." His HONOUR, in granting this injunction also observed it appeared to him the defendant had an ulterior object beyond profit in publishing these prints. It might have been done with a view to prevent an intended new Administration. — ( Laughter.) Sir EDWARD SUGDEN agreed with his Honour, for no one would have such Ministers. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Nov. 26. PRACTICE. --TAYLOR V. SREPHERD. This was a motion to have a writ o f attac h men t issued against the defendant set aside, the order of injunction founded upon it discharged with costs, and the defendant s demurrer received and set down for hearing. Thu case , th e circumstances of which it is unnecessary t o s t a te, involved ' a particular point of practice of some interest. A bill was filed by the plaintiff against the defendant on the 10th of November, and on the 1 3 th the defend an t p u t i n a n appear ance. On the 21st of November , at + A AT rniniges after -1- ;n the morning, the d efendant tiled 4 demurrer ..-, the same morning, the nio . ' 1- + l '.4 nlaiutiff nine o'cioe.. to the plaintiff's bill ; but, ment the Clerk's office opened at nine 0 . ei0c.,, had issued a writ of attachment against the defendant for want of an answer, and obtained an order of injunction NEW COURT. Thomas Douglas, aged 15 ; Joseph Douglas, aged 18 ; John Wicks, aged 17 ; James Stoneheiver, aged 19 ; Smith, aged 17 ; George Price, aged 17 ; Joseph Cle ments, 43 ; and Elizabeth Clements, his wife, were indicted, the six first prisoners for breaking into a summer house, and stealing several articles, the property of Benjamin Edward Denham, Esq., and the two latter with feloniously receiving the articles, ►ell knowing them to have been stolen. The COMMON SERGE ANT, in summing up, said there was no evidence against Thomas Douglas, nor against the man Clements, whose wife appeared to manage all the affairs. The Jury, after five minutes' deliberation, returned a verdict of Guilty against all the others. Mr. BODKIN said there were four other indictments for similar offences against the prisoners, but it was on the same evidence, and did not affect the male prisoner Cle ments, or the lad who had been acquitted. The COMMON SERGEANT observed that it was a lamen table case, and one greatly reflecting on the female Cle ments. She whose age and experience in the world ought to have placed her beyond ordinary temptation, had been guilty of the vilest and most abominable practices. Her's was a nursery of vice. She had been detected in harbour ing lads of that tender age, and initiating them in the art of thieving, and having sent them out to commit depreda tions, bad received the plunder, and had gained a subsist ence on their infamy. As regarded Wicks, he had been be fore convicted of felony, and had received a slight punish ment, that having been his first offence. He considered he should not be doing his duty to the public if he did not treat the conviction of Mrs. Clements with the utmost se verity. The Learned SERGEANT then ordered the Clerk of the Arraigns to call them up for judgment. Elizabeth Clements and John Wicks were then sentenced to fourteen years' transportation each, and the other pri soners who had been convicted to seven years. On Thursday last, a man in the employment of Messrs. Heslop, .Milward, and Co., of Lowca Foundry, White haven, saw a strange object afloat on the sea, off the embou chure of Lowca Beck, which attracted his attention. He waded up to it, and found it to be an enormous turtle, appa rently dead, He mnuut f e, upon it fgr the pippggp gf ppnyf3ying it to land, when the monster showed vitality enough tq put its fins in motion, and the adventurous navigator found himself sailing out to sea like another Arlon. In this extraordinary predicament, he dismounted "in all reasonable haste," CiPsl dry land, It turned out to be a turtle of the edible species, w hi i c t k ii i reached tile:noee and weighing no Itua than PO WeiOt g orter, This is coast loallr9oes:t live eo e, wt where etiortebaih:e:Fcgr ashore, and i f n ay in r du t a h l e o r du a g? s e s od i n s t o a itt n c e safe,anonct the tirsL of Cumberland.— initettaven EAST INDIA HOUSE. (Concluded from The Sun of yesterday.) Mr. WEEDING moved a resolution to the effect that the Court, adverting to the third resolution of the Court of Proprietors of August last, in which it was recommend that the commanders and officers of. the Company's ships, whose charters were unexpired, were entitled to compensation. The Court considered that the following scale of compensa tions would be equivalent to the loss they would sustain, namely :—Commander, 3,0001. for each voyage not com pleted ; chief mates, 5001. ; second mate, 400/. ; surgeons, 4001. ; third mates, 2001. ; pursers, 2001. ; fourth mates, 100/. ; assistant surgeons, 100/. ; fifth and sixth mate, 501. ; midshipmen, 301. ; boatswains, gunners, and carpenters, 25/. for each voyage incompleted. Mr. MACKENZIE seconded. the amendment Sir C. FORBES thought the Resolution of the Court of Directors ought to have been separated. As the amend ment now stood the effect would be, if carried, to annul the resolution of the Court of Directors, approving of the scale for the Company's maritime officers. The CHAIRMAN said that if the amendment of the Hon. Proprietor were adopted it would certainly have the effect of superseding the motion he had proposed. Mr. WEEDING should press his motion, relating as it did to the officers of ships whose contracts were unexpired. Mr. LINDLEY, a Director, said the effect of the motion would be to place commanders of such ships in a better si tuation than the commanders of the Company's own ships, as the latter had 5,000/. for five voyages, while the former would have 9,000/. for three voycges incompleted. Sir CHARLES FORBES could not support Mr. Weeding's amendment, although he thought that a large amount of compensation ought to be granted to the Commanders of ships whose contracts were unexpired. He could not agree that the Company's commanders should have only 5,0001. for five voyages, while the commanders of vessels for con tracts which had not expired would have 9,0001. He thought also that some better provision should be made for the senior officers, many of whom, after having been ten years in the service, were only to receive .50/. He thought this would be a complete blight to their hopes. Mr. WEEDING altered his amendment, with the view of the Court's adopting the Resolution proposed by the Chair man, but adding an opinion of the Court of Proprietors that the compensation he had brought forward should be granted. After a good deal of discussion upon a point of order, in which Mr. Laurie, Sir Charles Forbes, and other Pro prietors joined, as to whether the amendment or the original motion should be first put, the original motion was sub mitted for confirmation by the Chairman, and carried by a very large majority, only three hands being held up against it. The amendment of Mr. Weeding was therefore lost. Mr. SWEET complained that by the course adopted he had been deprived of the opportunity of moving the amend ment he had intended to propose, granting compensation to the commanders and officers of the contract vessels on the standard of the modified plan of the Board of Control. The Court then adjourned ; being specially appointed, and no other business being before it. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. Q UEEN- S Q U ARE. Yesterday William Jenkins, in the employ of Messrs. Armstrong the builders, in the Vauxhall-road, was charged on a warrant before Messrs. BURRELL and HEATHCOTE, with violently assaulting John Pitt, a workman in the em ploy of Messrs. Herbert, the proprietors of some extensive saw-mills in the Vauxhall-road. The shops of both masters are nearly opposite each other in the Vauxhall-road, anti the men in Messrs. Armstrong's employ belong to the Trades' Union, and those in Messrs. Herbert's are anti-Unionists. This circumstance has occa sioned numerous quarrels amongst the men belonging to the different establishments, and scarcely a day passes but a fight of some description or another takes place. The complainant, who had his arm in a sling, stated that he was not a member of the Union. On Monday last, about half-past twelve o'clock, he was going quietly to his work at Messrs. Herbert's, when some person came be hind him, and struck him a violent blow, his arm instantly dropped, and his shoulder • was dislocated. He turned round, and the defendant was the nearest person to him. He never spoke a word to one, nor did he give the slightest provocation. _ _ _ John Franklin, another workman, stated that he was go ing to work at the same time, when the defendant and a number of the Union came up. He distinctly saw the de fendant strike Pitt on the shoulder, when his arm dropped. The defendant then turned round, and, addressing one of the men, exclaimed, " It is your turn next." A number of other witnesses were called, who swore po sitively that the defendant struck the blow that dislocated the complainant's shoulder. The defendant denied the charge, and was about to enter into a detail of the different affrays which had taken place between the men of the different establishments on the previous week, but he was stopped by the Magistrates, who desired him to confine himself to what had occurred on Monday. The defendant called several witnesses, but they could only swear that they saw no blows struck. Mr. BURRELL, having consulted with his colleague, said that they were quite satisfied that the complainant had committed the assault, and fined him 40s. and costs, or to be imprisoned twenty days.—The fine was paid. The next case was against William Horne, an anti- Unionist, in Messrs. Herbert's employ, for assaulting John Hutchinson of the opposite party, in Messrs. Armstrong's employ. It appeared from the statement of the complainant that about three minutes past twelve o'clock on Monday after noon last, a short time previous to the last assault, he was coming out of Messrs. Armstrong's yard with other men to go to dinner, when the d e f en dant, who appeared to be in toxicated, and others, came up. The defendant threw up his cap, exclaiming " Where is Hutchinson ? I'll fight Hutchinson." The defendant then aimed a blow at his face, but it struck him on the side of his head. It was not a very hard blow. The defendant denied the charge, and called witnesses, but they could not disprove the charge. Mr. BURRELL said that they would fine any of the men who committed an assault. The present case was not of so aggravated a nature as the last, and the defendant must pay a penalty of 10s. and costs. The fine was paid. MARLBORO UGH-STREET. Samuel White and Benjamin Franklin, a couple of job bing chimney-sweeps, were summoned before Mr. DYER and Mr: SANDERS, for having hawked their vocation in the public streets, contrary to a recent enactment. The defendants entered the office with rueful looks, and after the charge was stated to them, they both pleaded " Guilty," in a tone of dismal despondency. The first de fendant, a blear-eyed old man, twisted his soot-begrimed visage with an expression of comical tribulation, and nudg ing his fellow-sufferer, urged him to give plenty of " cheek," and to speak out like a man. Mr. DYER-Why do you force us, Franklin, to put the penalty of the law on you ; you must know that you are doing wrong ? Franklin—Can't live without eating and drinking, and that's all about it. _ _ . . Mr. DYER—The fine for the offence is 405., and you give us no encouragement to be lenient. Franklin—lt's wery much agin my principles to give your vorship any encou ragement ; and I'll pound it, if you only lets me off this here vonce, you'll never catch me singing out agin. Mr. DYER—You misunderstood me, I suppose, when you answered as you did just now. Well; Smith, what have you to say ? Smith—l nose wery well vot I've to say, it's this here. That I stopped at home, according to law, until I vos a starving, and arter I'd sowld every universal harticle of property, down to the hidentical bed under my vife, whose the mother of fourteen blessed babbies, and then I vos hobligated to go into the streets and yarn summut at my trade. Mr. DYER—But why don't you try to get into some other employment, if you cannot support yourself at one trade, without breaking the law. Smith—Vy, I vont pitch no gammon, but this here's the pint ; I'm a wery old man, and it's more 'an fifty years since I vos a prentice, and all that ere time I never had no prowocation to larn nothink else, but the chimbly line. Vy I a young man can't get work now, so vere's the chance of an old 'un like me get ting a job ? Mr. DYER—lt ' s no pleasure to me, I assure you, to put the Act in force, but I must do so where an offence has been proved. Smith—Veil I duster say as your case is werry right, but I must get a mouthful of " grub" somehow. Mr. DYER put the moderate fine of one shilling and costs on both defendants. Ah ! said Smith, as he left the office, this here hact vos the work of the " Vigs," and now the Duke of Vellington as put the " Kibosh" on 'em, vich they never would have got, if they hadn't passed it ; that's vot's floor'd em. INCENDIARISM. Tha FMCS IN ROTIIERHITIIE.—TIIREATENING LETTERS.— On Tuesday morning Mr. Grice, the anchorsmith of Rother lithe, a portion of whose premises were consumed by the de structive fire in Church-alley, adjoining the river, was set on fire by some vile miscreant on Monday morning, but happily extinguished before any damage, except the burning of a wooden partition, was effected, received a letter, of which the following is IL copy, by the twopenny post, by which it would appear that further mischief is meditated by the wre tnes who have boll megns of ch. - va;uable property destroying so mu in the parish " To Mr, Grim, Anchorsmith, Rotherhithe. " Sir,—With all the con 3 iht.i may be taken, there will be some warm WOrik lo your parish. You will not be alarmed ; we will not hurt you ; it was only done to make work ; sure some of the large buildings must be raised before long." The letter bore the Cornhill post mark, and dated eight „.-- e o'clock, November 26, 1834. The words in italics Tcerio derlined in the letter. Mr. Grice is in a state of gre at ! b 4: lest another attempt should be made to fire his prope r T t heir the, precautionary measures adopted by the parishioner' a`t meeting on Tuesday night will, we hope, tend to preve t n . o o attempts being made, and restore confidence to the pariau! h oe 'The voluntary asso c i a ti on f o r the protection of the P aris iii a Lumerous body, and perambulate the streets durial thi An extra body of police are also on duty, an strictest watch is kept up. (From the Kentish Gazette.) .664 We have not room to report the proceedings at the- - „cs to form an Association for Protection against Incend . r e ;pis Saturday last, at the Fountain Hotel, in this city. .7 11 ;,,jsc i a highly numerous and respectable attendance. uP l fi dt9 1,0001. has already been subscribed for the formation ° e sa lr visional fund under the power of the Committee. ociv scriptions will be called for by a per tentage, as the m e a d , tion requires means to prosecute its plans.' An inl ens dition is expected to the fund. t ' We deeply regret to state that two fires undo The work of incendiaries occurred on Saturday night lagt' so f. first we notice was discovered about twelve o'clock 03 ciiffe , day night on the premises of Mr. Richard Knight,. 8 1 i i ieb the adjoining parish to Hoo. Very happily the vilnut t ; was rather strong, was blowing in a favourable d irec As it the loss of property would have been much gr eater' d 10 ,1 was, the destruction was great, including a barn I T c containing the produce of four acres of wheat and 1 0 0 e barley, a thrashing machine, and various farming i m P " o ath The Kent fire engine was despatched from Rochesteroc,lo first alarm, and rendered very efficient aid. The p r l e t s ub insured in the Kent Fire Office. We understand i a nz e cion attaches to some persons, and every exertion is to secure the offender. Sto l id s Another fire was discovered about three o'clock ' 2ll sbo = morning on the farm occupied by Mr. John Amos, Ashe pail with, near Feversham. A wheat stack containing, t,, duce of ten acres was consumed, and the destru on . ° T eg till' have been more extensive if the wind had not Fro kept the flames from communicating with the builaing s ;, tb THREATENING LETTERS.—We much regret W st e a l e, several threatening letters have lately been r eceife, ce spectable farmers in this vicinity breathing venge,%boX il alleged injuries. It is beyond doubt that these u,, 1 ' ye!, messengers of terror do not proceed from the labowl, santrv, but from some worthless wretches who live or extortion, and who thus vent their rage when tbe lf / t dent demands are resisted. Two of these letters• l : o 4 have seen, are both evidently written by the same p. - „•0 , A , appear to be directed by another, the writing , in ! . io lr being a miserable scrawl, whilst that on the outside iS well-formed hand. (From the Boston Herald.) A at l 7l , We regret to inform our readers that a secon act of incendiarism has taken place on the farm of ' I A Liam Gilbert, at Thoresthorpe, near Alford. On the ; 0 5 . : 1 4 we noticed the destruction of an uninhabited cot, tB h g e - scr l ' d ` same farm, and the narrow escape of the stacks- parr:v or wretches not having succeeded in their diabelie 3. 6 ;ol 4 at the time, completed it on Friday evening last h Y ese sg stacks. Soon after seven o'clock on that evening f,,11 seen issuing frora two stacks near each others °IL - e N ' caught a third, but although immediate alarm and assistance rendered, and the engines were On spot from Alford, so rapidly did the fire spread P a ds P, half an hour the greater part of the yard pres ent c e ti od i 's terrific blaze. The following stacks were o n " stab Thrteeof a haystack, wheat, one and bean, half of a one clo seed dittover, one oat, ,11e d ,bstre par • Al` t b 4 saved were two wheat, one bean, one bah — n did 4 mainder of the above hay and seeds. Notwitbstagm it is gratifying to know that Mr. Gilbert cannot sa,,,r fe in a pecuniary way, being insured in the Count, liiii.eo,e( to the full value of his crops. All the buildings a tlu , he escaped injury. The first dark evening after, — Nir.; / i attempt seems to have been taken advantage 0 'ad' bert's servants had been about the yard from t o re tli e h olt one had only entered the house a few minutes ; is was discovered by a neighbour's servant. Th,e r o ll 9 : r r doubt of its being done by some miscreant wel l with the premises and the movements of the &mill' , , sent he escapes detection ; we trust, however, taa ibl long be the case. We would earnestly re comalle n , mess of Saleby to form a night patrol for the preg ell 'lo s About twelve o'clock last Monday night som e fire to a stack of wheat at the farmyard of Mr. Hea r itilic of High-street, Spalding, which, with one of beat" i'be:,4l duce together of 22 acres), was wholly consumed. . o ne of water near the place rendering engines useless brought, nor was there any effort made to stop th c T ., g o 4 ,e je r this was also thought useless, the stack had h e ; of ce tually ignited. The stacks were burning the wli c4- 311..v t t day. The property was insured to the full value• rard is one of the overseers of the poor this year , tbr week before the burning his ccrn he had received a ing letter, to which he paid no attention. MARKET INTELLIGENCE• COAL MARI Per Ton. s. d. A,lair's Benshana Main lB 6 :ET.—Nov. 25. 116 Per Ton , PI Walls End No. . • 1 11 1 / 4 %:a a l i l h s t End rnd N}..a•rlcr•tetin, ................................ We'. End Per / " T Y.; ...... ... •• Walls End RA.JeI ..... ... .• Walls End V , a' ••• .. ••• Lunt)! on's Prisnoo.. ......... Wal , s End ...... Wails En.i %atop - . .... Ditto (resh i p r fimj . tie Wes En,l It 9 .. Walls End 5tew, 3 '0,...... ... •• Walls End Walls End Alio`, ...... Wa Is End Gotonjurso . Wal . s End South ........... Walk End Tees . Cownen ..................... Hartley ......... Merthyr ......... .• ^ Stlkstone VVilson . ;f a u Th.a.pe's Gawbe" G 'lll5 Brvhop's Main liebburn Main. 2l 9 Ho!ywell 621 G ord s Itedhugh lB 6 Picton lB 3 Sheriff Hill, unscreened 17 6 Shlpeate l7 0 South Hartley l9 0 Tanfield West Hartley Wittington 22 Wylam Walls End Pell :aid Brown 20 u %Valls End Bell, Robson &Co 22 0 Willa End C,rr and C• 2 i 0 Wa'ls End ( lark and Co 2O 4 WALi End Goforth W lls End Heaton x2 6 Wails End Hilda fel 0 Wills End Hotspur .. Walls End Killingworth • 1 9 Ships arrived since awaits cam Anungwortn • a u i •9 ..................../ VF' Ships arrived since last market-day. - , f , 11 Tll 5 ', ' COUNTRY CORN MARKETS DURING - I V, 13eAo 1.0; VVlarat. 1 Barley. 1 Oats. .........„„....,, 0 t i to it ' 1 / Per Quarter. 6. to s. B. t 9 B. ' s. to 5. ..,,'" .." ~ ' Abingdon.,---- 54 60 30 34 22 30 „,," .... / / And0ver.........-..... 48 55 '45 31 23 -- `" 4 9 / / Birmingham...-. 56 58 30 40 IS 22 """ 5 4 / Br.dport ~.................. 56 74 32 36 26 3O "'" 37 / / Cirencester ......... 38 50 24 37 23 27 -4 ,, / / Faringd0n.........-. 51 66 36 40 26 34 -- 41 / ' Guildford .. 48 74 23 32 26 35 ""' 4' / / Henley-.-.....-- 54 83 35 31 20 30 '''" 44 / / Hereford «..... 59 62 28 32 26 32 "" 5 , / / Highworth .....- 62 80 32 42 29 34 -- 4 1 '; 1 j „ 1 / Maidenhead ..-- 56 68 34 44 22 30 - / / M0nm0uth.......-... 62 64 30 32 30 32 -''' 45 / > !limning ---...... 40 66 22 36 14 26 ~,A - 41 7 ' / • Salisbury —....... 41 5l 28 33 23 '''' 4. - / ,' Southhmpton --. 54 58 33 4U 28 32 '''' 55 /f, Stroud -....-.--. 64 78 37 38 2 4 32 - I'; / / T ,wkesbury ......... 43 -. 34 - 30 38 -4 ,, / Uxbridge --......... 48 74 26 34 20 20 -'. 4'2 ............../ '34 ,t , / W adage—. 58 80 27 32 'l7 T 3 :,4 ~- / Warminster ......... 46 54 27 31 23 241 - "", , / WAidsor—.....-.... 59 - 21 22 ,-* il , .Vorcester..--- 48 52 32 36 24 ' 26 -.... Pc/ J . OM 0 LEWES MARKET.-Nov. a 6. dy. : Per Quar er. s. d. to s. d. Per Quarter. , 2 0 .. Wheat, White ... 42 0 5 , 1 0 Oats .................. ,F i -- Red 42 0 44 6 Pease .............. r ... . per j . , Barley 'lO 0 31 6 Oil cake... l • 2 /. ' . et.' 1, CHELTENHAM MARKETS" D a Wheat Per Bushel s. d. to e. d i 1 " M. ...°'-.... ' , l 5 0 66 I Beef. ............. .•••: ...". 2 3 6 0 3 3 3 9 1 Mutton veal . ... .. .... ........; Barley,....'' Oas 46 50 j Pork ... ..... 5 U 7 0 I LAW) ....... 31. Iss V 4/. 10 , ‘)(1 , .-...... ~ „. 40 i HULL MAIIKEL—Nov• := 5 a. - ~..1 Wheat, Old 40. 42, 46, ......New ...' ...s a ji 64 ------ Foreign —s. —s. —a. __JD bald , : 16 , .. 0: r. Oats, Poland . —s. 37.. 21s. ......01d ...... .............,* -- Small or Feed —.. 17s. 221. ............... ..••• . ~..s. Of -- Foreign...... ' d ...s. p r s• —a —s . i .............. . , Barley, Norf. & Sot 26. 20a. 3.?.. Line. & ‘‘''' ....i., , e k - Foreign .......................................... ••••" .. ... 4 yji• ~.4. Beans Sta. 7 , 6 .:+B, Foreign ...... . . ...J. ~., 00 Pease, White... . 'fares _:. _36 ; . _42: F O o r r e e y i i ...... : ..... : .............. 4” Ra,.eseed. in bond none . ..... .... Free per "1 C t q u° MEETINGS OF CREDITORS AT roe' P o BASINGHALL-STREET, TO-M' .... ...,:5:,'•" (From the London Gazette) S. D. Evans, upholsterer, High Holborn.. ................. . ... ..., ~,,, W. J. fluffy, printer, Budge-row ........................... ••:,.......2. W. Fuller, jun , carpenter, Beckenham, Kent ............ ....,...„„; W. Green, silk.warehouseinen, Cheapside ........ ... ... , . , f, e l/i F. P. Jervis, upholsterer, frathbone.place ..... . ................... 1 Jw. W. Porter, s s u ta rg ti e o o n n e , r, G G ow re e a r t ..s W trsee in f c . h . e .. s . , .e .. r . ...s . ............ t . .. . 13] . ................................. 1 J. P.,ulson and Co , stone.nlMnants Banksitle ........ ...... ~.. F. Frankland, carpet.waWnousernan' Oxford.street."::o,o, t T. Ward, hatter, Llv , c - 1 * ........ P°° .......................... ( 9 oyo e) On. the 23d inst at Eurs ß ha i m ß H l o ll us S e, Cunynghame, E sq ., , of of a daughter. Ili elP. LI, . NorfAr the JO 011 the 24th inst., at Worthing, the Duly - Ir 9 ' i Cumberland, Esq., of a daughter. e v olt, a t On the 26th inst., in Stanhope-place , 001 _ ... .. h0 f, v Af / lock, of a daughte r . of Phil3w- • fr . On the 25th inst., at Sunbury, the lady elle• d a son. le Of th O ' On the 22d inst., at Sparsholt, Maria, W' oi ley , / Barrington, of a son. ;'ll. 13 t On the 24th inst., the lady of Ashburtibarn 0 1 14 a daughter. lad!' , th e On the 20th inst., at Trevithick, Cornwa ll B. Boddington, Esq., of a daughter. Abb°tat " fir, MAR I? IE D. Th 0035 „, 'ID On the 26th inst., at St. Ann's, Soh o, Solicitor, of Dorchester, to Jane, eldest daugh ter °f 31j 0 1 /Nassau-street, Soho-square. IP? A DIED. ian , the 0, At Orleans, in France, Victoria Georgiji sop- of daughters of the late John Briske, Esq., by # 0 i niece to Lord Castlemaine. ele vent h it' On the 23d inst., at Edinburgh, Robert, , er , ° ‘ .4' Maclean, Esq., of Ardgour, Argyleshire. A nn Oro , 41 In Cumming-street, Pentouville, Mary ! or, a ge° o o," , Joseph Blower, of Lincoln's Inn-fields, 501i . ,;., 10.0 J On the 23d inst., Alice, the wife of Mr. w' 3 JO ' d 3 .:!? ham Rye, aged 49. a see° ' J On the 24th inst., at 1 31 ',Acheath, Georg W U-, .ir t o., the late Josoph Kiit u p, Esq., of Bloornsburkr._tee,yoyi On the ''': . i i w t., at Park-terrace, is. 1.1 4 ... /4 adr• . "'" .461PenZle , ; . :tOP4OY! --• ts.enzie, widow of Captain James oi Jo- Kenni'Tbor e' .. On the 22d inst., at Dobson's-terracet te of 130 vi i crl , , year, Hester, the wife of J. Dean, Esq... . 18 _ alio s ', o o o ~,, On the 23d inst., at the house of Walla , ' ea t o, ' A , . street, Hackney, Benjamin Smith, Esq., ag 0 1 13v' Stock Exchange. cec hran , On the 22d inst., aged 3i, Mr. Andre! Bucklersbury, and formerly of St. Petersbl___l.,. 015 pr ° London : Printed and Published by I , 'l stro pil. at The Sun Office, No. 112 { ' ca; e Co NTR H, to ~TE, hereb, 4,t at I kc, r , NiNt4i I I ■ t), l ()1 ( 140