The Sun. — London, England, 1856-04-26 00:00:00

TS- Royal 61 day Lll, on n was ,layed parish )y all •place presi 'Mere s, E. tes of nance k. B. E. F. .terly. ,tee-- q.D., r was nisei:, ounce ,ee for have s now sting. N. se- ident, ower, T 22d Z. 4s. their Aged y TO* 'ld in wards ire in with es of make etura littee. count tutors views lig re- et, to E 3 sup aation placr, utter rty or severe much ,en so .eport their lough. enter , as to it the lsider lames and ya 1 don use !k;" MONEY MA RKET AND COMMERCIAL INTELLIGENCD. . CITY, Two O'CLOCK. The Liverpool Cotton Market yesterday closed quietly, but with a steady appearance. The sales amounted to 10,000 bales, of which 2,000 were for export and on speculation. The Railway Share Market was quiet, and prices were a shade lower. The Bank of England return for the week ending the, 19th inst. is of an unfavourable character, although the payment of the dividends, and the demand for money to meet the final instalments of the Loan, have no doubt. principally produced some of the unsatisfactory changes exhibited. The decline in the bullion is accounted for by the shipments to Turkey on account of the Loan, but as these are likely to diminish, and the arrivals of gold from Australia continue large, an early alteration for the better is reasonably anticipated. Active Circulation Increase Bullion . 9,875,732 Decrease 3,167.890 11,145 2,958,753 484 - 383 11,907,623 407,078 796,057 12,903 13,117,833 Rest . Increase Public Deposits Decrea,se Other Deposits Decrease. Seven-Day and other Bills Decrease Government Securities Increase Other Securities ... Decrease ... Notes unemployed Decrease ... 199,396 15,929,363 865,165 3,668,600 226,440 Several rumours are in circulation with regard to the manner in which the Chancellor of the Ex chequer will obtain the pecuniary supplies neces sary for discharging the outstanding liabilities con nected with the war. It is confidently reported in some quarters that a loan of 10,000,0001. and a funding of Exchequer-bills to the extent of 5,000,0001. will be determined upon ; but after the remarks made to the Chancellor, when the last loan was taken, with reference to a suspicion that the particulars had been given to a few favoured individuals some days previously to the official announcement, i t is considered improbable that the pre cise intentions of the Government upon the present occasion have been allowed to trans pire. Many incline to the belief that the sum required will not reach 15,000,0001., that a small Consols loan will be taken, and that an issue of Terminable Annuities, will be included in the OPerations. All statements at present, however, are Purely conjectural ; but the determination of the Government will, no doubt, speedily be made known, and set at rest the anxiety which is now felt upon the subject by those interested in the progress of monetary affairs. The official return of the exports of bullion from the Port of London for the week ending Thursday l ast is as follows : azs„ Silver Coin II Hamburg 2, Bare Gold Coin 3/ f, Belgium 65 The Continental Bourses have exhibited some degree of fluctuation in the quotations of national securities during the week, with a general tendency to decline, which shows that the rise in stocks con sequent on the announcement of peace has been ° ver-estimated. On the Vienna Bourse the 5 per Cent. Metallics have fallen 4 to 854, ; shares of tilt New Bank of Credit 21 to 342, and Austrian Rail- W ays to 2611. At Berlin the 34 per Cents. are 86 4) and-the 4 per Cents. 96k. At Frankfort the 5 Per Cents. are 83, and the 44 Stock 7,6. At Madrid the 3 per Cents. are 40-70, and the New beferred 24-75. On the Paris Bourse the 3 per Rentes left off yesterday at a decline of 15c. fo r the account, and the 44 Stock improved 5 cen- A. telegraphic message from Liverpool announces the arrival at that port of the Royal Mail packet teemach from Australia, with advices from Mel bourne to the 31st January. These mention that a motion was brought forward in the Legislative Assembly proposing the reduction of the export c lutY on gold, but it was negatived by a large ma jority. The state of trade in the colonies generally is reported as very satisfactory. The price of gold ruled steadily at 31. 15s. ; and no alteration in the rates of exchange had taken place. This vessel brings 72,0001. value of gold on freight, besides a quantity in the hands of the passengers, who number 180. The unfavourable nature of the Bank of Eng land return, the particulars of which are given abo ve, and the rumours that a loan will soon be an nounced, have had a depressing influence upon Z b° Funds, a f ur th e r de c line of nea r ly p er cen t. "'jug occurred. Consols • have been 92j 92k, 4 , 14 9 21 921 for money. For account they ha ve been 92 921, and since 921 921. The ! lel l 3 per Cents. are 911 to 92, and the Re duced 91k g. 'ast India Stock is quoted 22 6. T he March Exchequer Bills are par to 3s. prem., a nd the June ditto 4s. to 2s. discount. In the • Foreign Market there has been in creased animation but sales have preponde rated, and prices are consequently weaker. Turkish 6 per Cents. have been 9G to 9 4, and. the 4 per Cents. 1011 Spanish 3 per (.., ' e llts. were 441, Do. Certificates 5, and French 41 Per Cents. 93, with the exchange at 25f. 40e. Sardinian Bonds have been 941. to 95, Russian 5 Per Cents. 1058, and Mexican 21/ ;, being flat. The following are the nominal prices of Foreign Sto cks :—Grenada Deferred Bonds, —; Mexican, 22 1 ; Peruvian, 77 78 ; ditto 3 per Cents., ; Portuguese 4 per Cents., 48 50 ; Russian Per Cents., 104 6 ; ditto 41 per Cents., 94 5 S panish 3 per Cents., 44 ; ditto Deferred, 231 z ; ditto Certificates, 4'l 51. ; ditto Passive, 6 71. Most of the English Railway Shares are consider ab ly lower in price, and the market has closed witi a dep resse d appearance. E ast A ng li an declined , 4 Edinburgh, Perth, and Dundee 1/. lOs "neat Western, 10s. Lancashire and Yorkshire 1/. \l' orth-Western 15s. Midland 1/. 55., and the rest I n proportion. The Foreign and Colonial lines ' l ave tended downwards. Great Western of Canada are ss. lower. Mining Shares have been dull. Bank Shares have mostly ruled firm, and the Miscellaneous Undertakings were about the same as previously. BRITISH IrITNDS' THIS DAY AT @N IL U' CLOCK. I" Prom the Ofeial List.) itronrA , done. I nor Cent. Redyced Annuitles..... ......... VA i h s ,Per Cent. Consols An nu iti es 92i 6 1 ' 4 e V. 7 $ per Cent. Annuities hdia Stock Cause's for Account Exchequer Bills, lid. March. June £lOOO. 3 p par I 2 4 d 2500 3 p par I %all. .. , y p Ditto Bonds, 185 S, 3i per Cent 9B ?RICE OF FOREIGN FUNDS AT ONE O'CLOI E. Brazilian Bonds, 5 per Cent. — Ditto New 5 per Cent., 1829 and 1839 9B 46 xican 3 per Cent — Ditto Account Russian Bonds, 1822, £ St., 5 per Cent 1054 thrdinian Bons, 5 per Cent. Ditto Account B Panisi BoNicis, 3 per Cent Ditto Account ,..1 Spanish Committee Cert. of Coup. nit fun 5 I nti , tt t Ronde 6 per cent — Ditto Account Ditto Guaranteed, 4 per Cent. Ditto Account lO4 i i nvntendn on the above .ayablo to Lund° , Preach Reatcs, 41 per Cent. 93f Ex 25f 40c TWO O'CLOCK. 921 i 9351 Consols, money Ditto Account MINING INTELLIGENCE.—AIining shares still show a ' l l"Pward tendency, and, in conseque nce , purchaser, ' , old aloof, waiting for the reaction which must, it is i loPposed take place sooner or later. Perh a p s one ca u s e of dividend mines sharing the general depression may be found in the fact, that the promised increase in the ratf Of Profits, upon which shares r se con,idernbly, has not Yet been realised,—Miqm Journal of this clay. The Victoria llfle Corps will muster for target prac- L l ce, every Wednesday afternoon during the summer months, at their shooting-ground at Kilburn. Durin g th e War this ground was i n daily lice by the recruits of th OEf.usebold Brigade of Gu Lo Bs or LIFE BY FIRE -- On ThUrPdav , I, 4 !!'h, Peel -street, and John Co; I , V; liurne.l to ;.t).‘!il Uf tiler Clothes taking fira during the absence of their parents, Who had locked them is in the room. SHARE MARKETS. (THIS DAY.) RAILW tYS. RAILWAYS. Closing Prices yesterday a iA.nabg. Nottng. Bost snd Eastn. Junct... ,! fast &I'allymen.i. 'firming. Wolvorb ".tour Valley tirk e & set ,re Junct „ JO. Cheth. & Birk. £5O and £25 o , n , Do., iyth & Tyne origh) , , £25 (load. at qristel and Exeter.. :11.1edonian ;arm. and Cardigan :nester & Holyhea , fork and Bando-. ork, Black, & Psi; Do. A Do. B rie7 Junction. .•• )I.blin&BelfastJune )un. P. & Joe , East Avgilati ...... Eastern Counties.. ' Tuion, A Sti IDs., B, Stout__ Do., Now East Kent .ast Lancashire Cdinhurgh& (Mango 7,:dinh. and Peebles Prth 4e Dun& Forth & Clyde Jun Farness Do. Extension........ Glasgow & G. West , Great N. of Scotlnd Great NortheTta Do., A. Steck -- Do., B. Stook Sth. &West.(lre : , Ireat Western Do. Stour Val. Rs° Gus. Stk i:rish South-Eastern Lancaster & Do., Thirds Do. New Thirds tAncash.andYorksi , Do., Wst. Riding Ur. Liv.Crsby.&Sonthi.t London & Blackwell Lond.Bright&S.Cst. Load. and N. Westr. Do. Fifths D0.101.5h..M&8...( Do. Eighths London andS. Westn Do., £5O IDo., £4O Lndndrry& Coleraine Lndndrrr.& Ennisk , Ilanch.Shof.k Linel 7)0. Alan. & Lin. Uzi Metropolitan 41.idland ... Birmng. & Derh • tfidld. G. West. (Ire, - )o. Half Shares Newcastle & Owlish Nwpt.Aberg. &Hri , ti'ewry & EnniskiU Newry Ws.rrenpoin and Rostrevor....„ Norfolk gorthn.Counties Tin North British Ilevem Rai!. & Dock Stock A Stock ....... , B Stock . .... Do., B Guarantee N. Eastern-13orwi Do. do. Extension Dodo. G.N.E. huoL Do. Leeds Do. York North London N.&S.Wstrn.,Ham - stead, and City JL North Staffordshir• North Western._ T. & S. Westru.Junt Nuneaton, Hinckle , Ind Leicester :Ix., Wore.. & Wolv •e.rts:., - .louth Scottish Control.. Scottish Midland -thropshire Err south Devon lontb Eastern Mouth Wales q. Yrksh. & Riv. Dee • Do qtpinos, 'Wok & Wol Stockton & Darli zktvn Jt Ilartlep Taff Vt.7e Do. Pref., No. 1 rhfunes Hay. D.& B. ITlverstone & Lanos Vale of Neath Waterfd. & Kilkenn , Waterford&Limeri c 3 West West Cornwall. Wost End of London and Crystal Palace Do. A Do, B West London Wimbledn & Croydon' 26 .- 27 8i --- 9 17} - V 15} - 1f; 12i 13. 88 - flO 59 i - EO 14 - . - 16} t 7 9j: 10h 3t 38 21 - 26 76 - 78 60 - 62 27 - 28 ••• 88 - 92 7 - 8 93 - 94 78 - 79 124 - 126 102 - 104 61i 62 70 - 75 6 - 7 p 5i - 6A 871 - 881 7k 7* 102 -- 101 1001 100* * d Ad A p $ 4 94 95 I Gro """ ••• `iB - 28* - 731 -74 i 13 - 45 ••• ... •y ""'` 14 - 13 51 - 56 31 - 37 331 ," 341 761 - 774 6 th 3i 3 d; 56 —76 87 --- 91 5 27 - 28 104 106 75 77 46 8 15 16 71 72 72 74 4 2 —cl 36 - 37 ••• ''" is a 161 - 5 . 6 - 6 - - 7 . 8 - 24 5 - sjp Autwerp&Rott •rdam Do. 5 p. c. Oblgs. con. in Sh. at par till '64 Ardennes Belgian Basta. June Besiers to Grai saessa Bombay, Baroda, an Central India,l32rit Do. Demerara 8i - 8i par 2 61 Q, 21 2 3 41 - 2 Hutch Rhenish Eastern et Frame Do. New 11 - 10 pl 41 -41 i lEast Indian, g. 5 p. 23i - 24 231 - 2 Do. V:steilsioll.. D 0.41 p.c.Bnds.,'s7 no. do. do., '59, dr Gee' ong 'z Melbourne guar. 5 per c nt. . Do., Lou. allot., do. Gd. Tk of CanadaA Do. - 171 17i Do. Cert. of Donee.. con. into Stk. tiU" Do. Comp. 6p. c., do Gt. Cehtral of Fran, U. Indian Peninen Great Luxembour Constituted Share Do. Ohli tion , •... Do. re-is. .orftd. Sh. Wnotern or ( a 75 77 86: 1 1 874 9 - 221 -22 i 6 - 7 3/1 - 25 - 26 3 -34 pl Do. New_ I Do. Bfl s. payables 7 with option till '55.. Do. do., '62, p. '56.. Do. do., '76, p. '60.. 1 D. do., '73, without option 1 I Tarnilton Pic Toront 11 Do. n per cent. 7 Lake Collat. & Baal 11 Lierre and Turnhout Li Lucca , 7Pist. sp. c.p Lyons and Oc.n.vh , 4 Lyons & V.dit.rrN , 11 NiadraF, gua • 4 p.c 0 Do. New 0., sp. c 0 Do. 44 p. c. Exten 11 Maria Antonia ll Do. do. New ..„.. 99 - 100 124 - 129 124 - 129 log 1( , 9 25 26,1 d 123 128 12ip - I 19i - ; - INamnr & Liege. ( int0re5t).......... Do. (ox interest)... Northern of France. D 0.201. Ellis. 7 7i 5 - 64 42 - 421 124 1 Do. M. 3 g. c Ras (fmy.R. dx Ams.Shs. Norweginn'Prtink_Pro Paris and Lyons Ditto Bonds Paris and Orleans__ Rome and Frascati Royal Danish Rcys.lSwedish Do. Obligations .... Sambre and Meuse._ Do. 5. p. cent. Pref. Scinde, guar. 5 p. c 8 - 9 561 - 56 ••• - . 5,4 - 56 20 7- E 12 - -12 i; 0.), 10 I 21 - 20 Do Southern of Frame St. Andrew's no Quebec (A) West Flandero Do sis per c. Prof W. & N. W. of Franc , West. of Switzerland Wiesbaden Zealand ... -- Pm ... .- - 4i - 5 ... a.. 35i ...- 36,1 JOINT-STOOK BANKS. 0 .11 A ustram, 92 -- 94 94 '25 5 Bank of Egypt - lh si 100 50 Bank of London 65 64 40 5.11 Col. Bk.&Ln. C. ,„. 50 all flritiila N. American 661 25 5 Chartd. Bank of Asir, I' p 20 4 Child. Bnk. of India, Australia, & China 100 50 City 63 -- 65 1.09 25 Colonial •.. 100 20 Commercial of Lond 20 Erg.Seot•StSus.Cht. 151 —16 i 20 all Lend. Chart. Bk. oi Australia• 27d 26 5 'Ditto New ........... ; 50 20 I. don and Conn ..• 100 50 Lna.&E.Bukg. p. par 2p SO 16 London Joint S net,. 100 10 London and Paris 4 -- 3 d WI , 20 l•t•nd.,et , A.'oetinmste 464 ux, N'e.tional Pro.of Eng 20 10 Do. New • • 50 22' N'atione of Ireland. ••• 20 all New South Wales.... 41 -- 43 25 all Oriental Bank )f `orporatirn . 42 43 20 5 Ottoman Bank IIP 5 I to 5' • oval Bri isl 25 N.) :,stralia „. -- 2r! nf . 3 ,..nptrt 7O 72 70 ' l. 7 ns- ...••••••••••.1• 74 50 10 Tnioll of _enuon • : 27i P 3 Western Bk of Lon 4 ; 3 Business done this day 20 5 20 18 ZO Z 5 1 35 100 g o 4 16& 16 9t 871 7 i 1021 2 100 99i 72:1 33 2i 111 11 23 7 14/ 70i li TO/ 411 1 23} 23 6 i i 25 / a4l 8i i 11 - 11i 12A 71 THE SUN, lONDON,_SATURDAY EVENING, APRIL 26, 1856. SPORTING NOTES. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT, A PRELUDE. Ti Le week just broughitoa close has been fraught wi tt, many changes. New favourites for different races, have, been introduced into the betting, while ohl ones ha vie been knocked out of the market. Fazzoletto has ta'lte n the place of Fly-by-Night in the list of quotations for• the Two Thousand. He has been tried with Hobby H of •se, Bracken, and others ; and although somewhat ba al :ward in his preparation, yet "he did all that was Al of him" so easily that hopes are still entertained at , the Two Thousand, at least, will be carried to Mal te.n, Yellow Jack "oscillates," mos: perplexingly be tvrel in 7 to 4, and 3 to 1. He has been hotly " peppered" duri rig the past week, and the hostility of his opponents is a ttributed to the unsatisfactory nature of the trial which it is asserted he had with Omer Pacha. Bird -in-Hand is quiet. If the ground be soft he may be seen to advantage. Despite, however, the , powerful opposition which is arrayed against Yel low Jack, I must confess that lam in expectation of seeit'g" Bilidus John all right-again." TI se defeat of Ellington by Fisherman created a seri'. Bathe n, and has cleared the way for the advance of cer 7 taire animals from the outside division in the Derby bet-. tin g. Cannobie has recently been located at C tweton,. wh.er a he bad und.;rgone a course of physic. He is, how ever,„ new all right again, and is doing good work. Wen tworth has been backed during the week with con sitl,erable spirit and determination, He, is entered for the N sw market Stakes next week, bat it is doubtful whether eurinsity will he gratified by his fialfilfing his engage man 5. HOUSE OF LORDS-(YESTERDAY). The LORD CHANCELLOR took his seat on the woolsack at the usual hour. Petitions a4ainst the Marriages 811 were presented by Lord REDESDALE and the Marquis of BIIEADALI3ANE. The Duke of. CLEVELAND presented a petition in favour of the bill. Lord BROUGHAM presented a petitien from Hali fax, complaining of the grievances under which women labour by the existing state of the marriage, law. Lord OVERSTONE presented a petition from the metropolis, signed by upw ar d s o f 300 c l erg y men o f t h e Church of England, in favour of the legaliseation of the marriage with a deceased wife's sister, and also several _other petitions, most numerously signed, with a similar prayer. Toe Bishop - of OXFORD presented a petition from Hampshire against marriage with a deceased wife's sis ter. Some of the petitioners were of the labouring class, and they stated the measure was uncalled for. The .Barl of ALBEIIA.RLE presented petitions of ri totally opposite character--ono was signed by upwards of 17,000 persons, and the others were also numerrufdy signed : --in favour of the legalisation of marriage with a deceased wife's sister. TRANSPORTATION. The Earl of STANHOPE said be had received a state meet from the Government which induced him to,post. pone the appointment of a select committee on the subject of secondary punishment, of which be Lai given Dotter% The Marquis of LANSDOWNE could. assure the noble earl and their lordships generally that her Ma jesty's Government had this subject under their consi deration, and that it was their intention to institute such an inquiry as be thought would ba considered satisfactory to all parties, with a view to the placing the law with• respect to secondary punish ments upon a more effectual footing than it appeared at present. The noble marquis concluded by moving for a return in reference to the number of convicts who had been committed to prison within a certain period, the sentence passed upon them, and the number that had been granted tickets of leave. Earl GREY said that if there was to be any inquiry at all before legislation was attempted, it ought to be gone into with-the least possible delay. They were now very near Whitsuntide, and if-it was intended to consi der the subject this session, no further delay ought to be allowed to take place. Lord DUNGANNON said he trusted that the pre sent session would nut be allowed to pass away without something being done on this subject. It had been ima gined that a person who had bad a ticket-of-leave granted hi:n had a certificate of good character, but, on the contrary, it appeared rather to be a stigma than anything else. The subject then dropped. THE NAVAL REVIEW. Tb e prospect of a busy and important meeting next week is most cheering. I shalt despatch my advices from Heat 1 -quarters for publication on Monday, when I wilt cot an iunicate to the reader any little bit of information. I tyla:y be enabled to pick up. As the R. M. Plate will be ae aided before my notes are placed before the reader on that day, I will express my pre3ent fancy for Kali pygp and Omer Paella. A FRESM MAN, PROORESS OF THE COTTON MANUFACTURES (FROM OUR OWN CORRESPONDENT.) Tho magnitude of the cotton manufacture is apparent from the fact, that tLe real value of last year's importa tions of raw cotton amounted to nearly twenty-one millions sterling. So rapid has been the increase of this great branch of our manufactures that the raw cotton imported into the United Kingdom has almost doubled in quantity daring the last fifteen years. Within that period the cotton manufacture has been careering onward at a pace which has outstripped' the most sanguine ex pectations. Manchester, the principal seat of the cotton trade, has rapidly advance), from the enterprise and succeess which have accompanied it, in arts, science, and all kinds of useful learning, until it has taken high rank among the most distinguished cities of the world ; and,_at the present time, its numerous suburban villages and towns continue to stretch out towards the central seat of trade and opulence, so that it will not be extra vagant to expect that Manchester and the surrounding manufacturing towns will, at no far distant day, become one mighty ci.,;y of manufactures and commerce. The total quantities of raw cotton imported into the United Kingdom, from the United States, the Brazil; the Mediterranean, the British possessions in the East Indies, and British Guiana, and other countries, amounted in 1841 to 487,992,355 lbs. ; whilst in 1855 the imports reached the large quantity of 891,752,002 lbs. To show the relative quantities of cotton wool contributed for the use of our spindles, and the support of tens of thousands of our industrious population in the manufacturing districts, we subjoin a statement of imports for the past year : From the United States, 681,629,424 lbs. ; from the Brazils, 24, 577, 9621b5.; the Mediterranean, 32, 904, 1531b5; British possessions in the East Indies, 145,179,216 lbs.; British West Indies and British Guiana, 468,452 lbs. ; from other countries, 6,992,805 lbs. Earl GRANVILLE said that since yesterday he had made nquiries into the causes of the mistakes of Wednesday, and he had now to state to their lordships what were the instruc tions given by the Admiralty for the safe conveyance of the two Houses of Parliament to and from the naval review. Some time ago arrangements were male with the South- Western Railway to Carry their lordships down to Southamp ton, and at the beginning of this week Capt. Milne had had an interview with the traffic manager to ascertain from him whether it was perfectly certain that the company could un dertake under the pressure to which it was likely they would be subjected to convey their lordships without chance of a failure. The answer he received was, that the company had made such arrangements that it was absolutely certain that both the peers and the members of the other house would arrive at Southampton at a quarter past 9 o'clock. The Ad miralty sent a communication to the municipal authorities of Southampton, requesting them to take every precaution to keep a clear passage from the railway station to the place of embarkation, and they also wrote to the packet agent —a per son of great experience —desiring him to do everything in his power to facilitate the embarkation of the two houses. Or: ders were also given to appropriate the Harbinger and the Pasha of Egypt yacht as tenders to convey the two house's on board their respective vessels, and the packet agent was directed to hire two additional tenders. He wrote back to say that it was perfectly impossible for him to hire any ves sels, and two other steamers were then sent round for the service. With regard to the selection of the Transit she was thought to be a very fine vessel, and having a largo maiadeck she afforded accommodation for a large number of persons to breakfast together, with the additional advantage of being under cover in case of rough weather coming on. Inquiries had been made beforehand as to the state of her 'en g i nes , ' an d the answer was - that theywere in good order, with the excep tion of a slight defect in the air pumps, the only effect Of which would be, to reduce her speed from 11 to 10 knots an hour. The officer Selected to command - . was - a gentleman of con. siclerable experience, and their lordships had all been wit nesses of his great cJurtesy. (Hear, bear.) His instructions were to-be ready to receive the company at-9 o'clock, and - having taken them on board he was-to steam down the two lines, to wait for her Majesty, and on her arrival to take up her station as near the Reyal yacht as possible. In case of any unforeseen delay he was to keep' outside for fear of coming into collision with any of the gun-boats, What better in structions, even judging after the event, could have been given them there, be could' not see. The Admiralty had since made inquiries as to the state of tbe Transit's engines; and it was found that the only cause of their failure was that -the'steam had got low in consequence of the fires having been let down. They had ordered a. .strict and searching inquiry to be made as to who was to blame for this omission, and whoever he was he would be punished. The whole thing arose from the unfortunate breakdown on the South-Western Railway —an event not so very extraordinary after all, con sidering that the company had undertaken to carry so large a number of persons beyond their usual traffic. The accumu lation of trains on the line was so great that between 700 and 800 persons arrived at the point of embarkation at Southamp ton at the very moment when the two houses were expected.. At the first the packet agent declined to ship them because he wished to keep the tenders ..for the use of the houses, but he was perfectlY unable h to resist the entreaties and remon strances of 700 to 800 gentlemen and ladies, all crowding and squeezing together iu the dust and heat. He thought it better to use the tenders to - get them out of the-way, and that was the reason why they were not forthcoming when - their lordships arrived. With regard to the personal charge made against him, he was afraid he should not be able to make so satisfactory an answer. He had reflected deeply on tho subject since, and he could not think of any excuse for the pusillanimity which he had displayed. (Laughter.) He could not accept the compliment which the noble earl oppo site had paid him for acuteness and sagacity, for he had so completely lost his presence of mind that he had only carried off with him one neutral 'peer and four noble lords of her Majesty's Opposition. (Laughter.) The Marquis of CLANRICARDE wished to know who was to answer for what was done and what was left undone by the railway company. He was afraid that Parliament at pre sent had no power to punish the offenders, but ho hoped that no lon g time would elapse before a bill wou ld b o b roug ht i n, giving Parliament and-the country supreme power over these railway companies. Lord RAVENSWORTH was willing to accept the noble earl's apology with respect to the arrangements, or rather the disarrangements of the early part of the day; but the noble earl had given no explanation of the main grievance —namely, the seven hours occupied by the Transit in her passage from the place where she had taken up her position back to South- . ampton. Earl GRANVILLE said ho imagined that his statement that the-fire had gone out was a sufficient explanation of the absence of motive power. (A laugh.) _ The Earl of GALLOWAY complained that the railway company had not taken the most ordinary precautions for the accommodation of their lordships. The subject then dropped. Our exports of cotton manufactured goods have in creased, as the prosperity of the manufacturing districts show in an equally gratifying degree, In 1841 the de clared value of cotton manufactures of all kinds exported from the United Kingdom was 16,252,510/. ; of cotton yarns, 7,266,068/. In 1555 the declared value of cctton manufactures of all kinds was 27,531,2781., showing an increase in value of about 11,000,0001. The return as to cotton yarns shows a slight decrease as compared with that of 1351. The above figures indicate the vast amount of ma chinery at work in the cotton districts of Laaoashire and Cheshire, and the great importance to the empire of our cotton manufactures. NEl,VS.—(This Day.) COVENT GARDEN. We had a steady trade to-day, and prices generally were well supported. MONT.—Pine apples, English, Eis to 12s per lb.; colonial do., Os to Os each ; hot-house grapes, 15s to - 25s Od per lb ; foreign ditto ' Oct to Os ; melons, 2s Od to 3a 6d each ; peaches, 2s Od to 68 ' nectarines, is 6d to 4s per dozen ; apples, 2s 03 to 3s Oct per half sieve ; pears, 3s Oct to 6s per dozen ; plums, Os to Os per sieve ; green ga ges , O s per punnet; apricots, is Gd to 5s Od per doz.; common plums, Os Od to Os Od per sieve; cherries, ed to Od per. pound ; lemons, 6d to 1s 6d per doz ; oranges, 6s to 12s par 100 ; fil berts, 9s to Os per doz. lbs ; cobnuts, 15s to Os ; almond s , Os to Os per lb. ; walnuts, 01 to. 0,1 per 100; figs, Os 9d to is 6d per doz. ; strawberries, 9d to is 6<l per oz. ; goose berries, Os Od to Os Od per half sieve ; currants, Os Od to Os Od per half sieve; rasphirries, Od to Od per pottle. VEGETABLEb.—Greens, is Gd to 3s Oct per doz. bunches; cabbages, is to is 6d per dozen; Savoy ditto, is to 20 Od per do. ; brocoli, is to Is 6d per bundle ; potatoes, 60s to 95s per ton ' • vegetable marrow, Od to Os per doz. ; peas, Os to Os Od per bushel ; French beans, 2s Od to 3s Od per 100 ; turnips, 3d to 6cl per bunch ; carrots, 6d to 81 per bunch ; cucumbers, ls Od to 2s 6d each ;: garlic, 8d to Os 8(1 per pcund ;.spinach, 2s Gd to 3s Od per sieve ; old onions, 2s 6d to 4s per bushel ; new ditto, 3d to 4d per bunch ; leeks, 2d to 3d per bunch ' • shallots, 6d to 8d ; horse-raddish, 2s Od to 4 s p e r bundle ; parsley, 3d to 5d per bunch ; celery, Os 9d to is 6d per bunch ; endive, 2s Od to 4s Od per doz. ; beet, is Od to 2s per doz. ; parsnips, Os Gd to is Od per dozen ; small salad, 2d to 3d per punnet ; mushrooms, is Od to 2s Od perpottle ; artichokes, 6d to 8d each ; cabbage lettuces, 6d to is 03 per doz. ; sorrel, Od to Os per half sieve ; radishes, 6d to is Od per dozen hands ; tomatoes, 3s to 4s per half sieve; chillies, is to is Gd per 100; Brussels sprouts, 2s Od to 3s Od per half sieve ; capsicums, is to 2s per 100 ; walnuts pickling, Od to Os per 100 ; cauliflowers, is to 4s Od per doz. ' • rhubarb, 4d t o 8d per bundle ; asparagus, 5s to 12s perloo ; sea k a il, i s t o 2s 6d per punnet. the particular chapter - in Leviticus, generally relied on by thci opponents of the bill, did not relate to marriage, but to up. lawful intercourse. Let any unprejudiced man who had never heard of the dispute. upon this question refer to his Bible for information: Would he not tell their lordships that the only passage upon the subject was the 18th of Leviticus, where a man was desired not to take 'a wife, to her sister to vex her in her lifetime ? Attempts had been made to show that the words used in the authorised :version did not truly express the words of the original ; but almost all the most eminent biblical authorities assured us . that the translation of this: passage iu the authorised version of the Bible was most accu rate and correct, and that the Chaldee, the Samaritan, and: all the ancient versions gave the same sense as the, authorised version. There was nothing in the Bible to show that a man' was not at liberty to do the same act at other times and in`- other places. There was a Divine ingtruction —" Ye shall' not add to the Word that I command you." It appeared to him a perfectly unsound argument .to say that, if marriteze with a brother's widow were prohibited, marriage with-a-de leea-sedwife"s sister ought not to be allowed, or .that it ought; to overthrow tho permission- contained in the 18th of Leviti cus: Jeremy Taylor, -in his Ductor Dubitantiurn, said : " But if any.serupulons person shall inquire further, and suspect that some degrees or persons are forbidden to. marry that are not here expressed, but included by a parity of rea son, as .11 happensiu another _instance, for it is not forbidden to marry our mother's brother's wife ; but -because here it is made unlawful to marry our father's brother's wife it is to be concluded also for the o.her, there being the same degree and the seine reason. "I answer to this by, parts. 1. It is very likely that it is se iutemled that in eqUal cases there is au equal prohibition; but it cannot certainly be concluded and relied upon that it is so. 1. .Ilecause upon this account cases of. fear and scruple might very much leo multiplied to no purpo e, for I remember • that Fagius reckons out of the books of the Rabbies 2) per sons forbidden to marry, which yet are not reckoned in Lee vitiehs. 2. Because of the rule of the law, 0. Mattis, 43 D. de procur quod lege prohibitoria non vetitum est perznis sum intelligitur.'. In negative precepts that which is not r. bidden is presumed to be allowed. And to add more out of fear is either to he wiser than the lawgiver, or to suspect Win to be_ apt to quarrel by unknown -measures and secret. rules of interpretation. 3. Because I find that among wise nations the saraeLdegree does viotalwiey's admit the same prohibition." Then it was said that there was a degree of consanguinity. between a man and his wife's sister. On this subject Bishop Milner said . - - • • "It is at this day a great question among all men whether brothers and sisters' children or cousins german may lawfully marry ? which question supposes not only that the Levitical degrees are still thought obligatory, but even all those other degrees which by a parity of reason can be reduced to - those measures," On the words " near of kin "Jeremy Taylor said : " Our English is not sufficiently expreSsive of the full sense of it. The Latin is something nearer to the Hebrew. Vir non "aecedat ad propinquitatem carnis sum.' God never forbade to marry - our kindred, but he forbade to marry the nearness of our flesh. Remineius gives a rtile for this as near as can be drawn from the words and the thing, Pre pinquitas carnis,' saith he, qu.e me Sine iatervalloattingit.' That-is, She that is next to me, none intervening between the stock and me.' That is, the propinquity. or nearness of my flesh ; above - me is my mother, below is 'my daughter, on the side is my sister—that is all. " In negative precepts that which is not forbidden is pre sumed to be allowed. . • - Unless God had intended these a perfect enumeration of all the persons forbidden to contract marriages mutually, it cannot be imagined why He should be pleased to repeat some degrees - twice, which are equally forbidden in the'several in stances ; for if the parity of .cognation were to be the mea sure, then those degrees which are twice repeated might with out such repetition have been better reduced to the rule under which they were sufficiently prohibited. - " The same degree does not always admit the same prohi bition ; to marry my father's sister was forbidden, but it was not forbidden to marry my brother's daughter." A right rev. prelate who had made a speech on this subject which had been published in a pamphlet, had fallen into an unintentional error in a quotation from Jeremy Taylor, which he had•no doubt be would correct in any future edition. We could have no better definition of the words " nearness of kin," ou which the opponents of ttlis measure relied, than that -given by God himself, which gave no sanction to the existing prohibition. The words "in her lifetime," in Levi ticus, clearly spoke for themselves, for the injunction to a man not to a certain thing at a particular time and place must be taken to imply a liberty to do it at a different time and place. -No argument drawn from analogy could Over, come that plain and unmistakeable inference. -Nobody pre tended that our Lord or any of his Apostles had expressed any disapproval of these' marriages ; and the absence of any condemnation of them on the part of St. Paul was especially significant, inasmuch as that inspired writer treated very copiously of the subject of marriage. The case of the elicit connexion betweesu Herod and Herodias, which elicited the remarkable reproof of John the Baptist, was sometimes referred to in arguing this clues:. tion ; but, when impartially examined, it would be found to furnish no ground for adherence to the present restriction. Josephus on this subject said—" After whose death" (that of Salome) " Herodias took upon her to confound the laws of our country, and divorced herself from her husband while he was alive, and was married to Herod (Antipas), her husband's brother by the father's side. He Was Tetrarch of Galileo." To this a note is appended by ..Whistonoriz.--e" Nor - Was it, as I agree with Grotius and others of the learned, Herod the Tetrarch, but this Herod-Philip, whose - wife Herod the Te trarch had married, and that in her husband's lifetime, and -when her first 'husband had issue by her, for which adulter ous and incestuous marriage John the Baptist justly reproved Herod the Tetrarch," Origeu, in his Comreeutary on St.. Matthew, chapter- xiv., verso 4, also says f--" Philip was, indeed, the Tetrarch of . Iturma. and. of the - region of Tra chonitis. Soma think, therefore, that after Philip had died, and had • left a daughter, Herod married Herodias, the wife of ills brother,. his law permitting- marriage when children did not Survive. Since, however, it is not by any Means clear to us that Philip had died, we think that Herod's transgression of the law was yet greater, that he seduced the wife of his brother while living." In the Ann,cils of Baro - nius, vol. 1, page .80,_ it is stated-,--" We must not omit to say that that passage of the Evangelists concerning Herod, that he married his.brother's wife, was perverted-by the Mon tauists, who, in order to found the heresy concerning mono• gamy, that it was not lawful for a widow to marry again, and that they might be able to prove this from the Gospel, added, as they incorrectly read, that Herod married the wife of his deceased brother, as Tertullian (ad Marc. 1, 4,,chap.'34), who held the same o pi n i on w ith them, read. But he wrote these things, when he was writing against Marcie; who treated the Gospel with contempt ; when, however, he wrote against the Catholics, whom he calls Psychichi, in his book De Monogamia, he abstains from any false citation of that kind." A note appended alleged Tertullian to have become a Montanist. Noldius De Vita -et Gestis geroclum says " This woman, Herodias (the daughter not of Aretas, King of the Arabians, as Jerome pretends, in Matthew 14, but of Aristobulus) . ,Herod the Tetrarch having seen at the house. of - his brother-Herod, when he turned aside to visit him on his way to. Rome, made lois wife, contrary to the laws, having taken her away from - her lawful husband, who was yet alive, though , Augustine iu vain...denies this," In the Chronicon Paschaleit is stated :—" And Josephus relates that it was on account of-Herodias, the wife of Philip, Herod's brother, that St. John wus beheaded. For Herod had put away his yet sur viving wife, to whom he had been lawfully mar r i e d, s h e b e i ng -the daughter. of Aretas, King l et' the Arabians, and had; more over, separated Herodias from her husband while ho was yet living, having also on her account put John : to death." Set den " De Jitre Naturali" argued that, if we' understood Jose phus aright, we should find the case did_ not come under Leviticus xviii., 16, but was simply a case of adultery : " Atquai ita sane ad legem illam de fratria leviro ducendares attinere nequibat, sed ad illam qua aliens uxor cuique inter dicitur." The noble lord contended that the testimony of 'these authorities, fairly construed, ought to satisfy their lord ships, and even the right rev. prelate to whom he had before alluded, that the case of Herod and Herodias was wholly irre levant to the" discussion. Under the Mosaic law it was enjoined that, when a man died without issue his brother should marry the widow. Marriage with a deceased wife's sister was an ana logouS-alliance, and might be sanctioned by a parity of reason ing. If the marriage with a deceased wife's sister were immo ral, that with a deceased brother's wife could scarcely be ex empted from censure ; yet the latter conduct had the express authority of Scripture. It was not to be imagined that the Almighty would have given his approval to a practice which could under any possible combination of circumstances operate to the injury of morals. Some right rev. prelates had asserted that the clergy were prohibited from celebrating such mar riages as the present bill was intended to legalise ; but it w..s worthy of observation that there was no instance on record of a clergyman - being punished for (loin so. The clergy of some of the most populous parishes in a petition presented 4c) their lordships' house, stated that this prohibition was productive of unhappiness; and in some cases of immorality, and they therefore prayed for its removal. The act of the noble and learned lord not now present (Lord Lyndhurst) load placed their lordships in a dilemma. A number of those marriages had been contracted, although the ecclesiastical law declared them' incestutins, and the noble and learned lord's bill, which waspassed without a dissentient voice, declared them legal. [The Bishop of Exeter—" No, no!"] The right rev,, pre late dissented from this, because he had sonde crotchet th a t the ecclesiastical courts had still , the power of punishing these persons. He had no hesitation in saying, on the autho rity of ,Sir W. Follett, that had the ecclesiastical courts meddled with them the courts of law would have interposed; and even had the courts of law remained quiet; Parliament would have stopped in to prevent any such exercise of- eccle siastical Owen Much had been said lately with regard to the law, of Scotland on this point. A remarkable - judgment had lately been pronounced by one of the Lords of Session with regard to this subject. The Lord - Ordinaryhad said : " Marriage,' says St., Paul, is honourable in all,' and against every restriction by mere human authority on the liberty of marriage the Protestant authority stands recorded. Accordingly, the Scottish law of restraint ou marriage is avowedly founded on the Divine prohibitions. Thedoctrine of the reformed ohurches is, that marriage shall be as free as the law of God has left it ; and the Divine law as coutaiued in the 18th" chapter of Leviticus is imported into the Scottish statute of 1567, chap. 14, and is referred -to iu the next statute of 1567, chap. 15. All connexions expressly prohibited by the Divine law in this 18th chapter of Leviticus are declare, by the statute law of Scotland (1567, chap. 14) to be incestuous and punishable with deat.h. To find the express , prohibition against marriage with the sister of a deceased wife, it . ne cessary only to examine. the Scriptures, but more particu larly to 'construe the 18th chapter of Leviticus, and 'if there is no -express prohibition there the connexion is net incestuous, 'There loss been no such series of decisi ons, no such solemn deliverance, practice and no such settled judicial as to amount to an authoritative construction of the statute, and relieve . the Court from the necessity of construing it by the canon of the 18th chapter of Leviticus. Then, the de claration in the " Confession of Faith," and the Parliamen tary ratification of that confession, though binding on the Presbyterian Church, and though, . per h aps, binding on the state of a Presbyterian country to civil effects, is not binding - as a l e gislative construction of the prohibition of the Divine law to the effect of creating a capital crime. The question, What says the statute?' throws us back on the other ques tion, What is expressly, : prohibited' in the 18th chapter of Leviticus ? Nothing less than an express prohibition can be sufficient.' If there is no empress prohibition, it is not within the statute. On this point the Lord Ordinary would wil lingly defer to the authority of the' Confession of Faith,' but in this Protestant country, which refuses to be ecclesiastical authority the right to create or declare a crime, it is impos sible to escape from the responsibility of forming and inde pendent opinion. With great diffidence, therefore, and with unfeigned respect for the many learned and excellent persons who have arrived at au opposite conclusion, the Lord Ordi nary ventures to express his opinion that there is in the Di vine law, and more especially in the 18th chapter of Leviti cus, no such express prohibition' of this marriage as to make it incestuous under the statute." These marriages were permitted in every country of Europe; even in Russia, in some cases. In France, which was a Ro man Catholic country—not recognising, however, the Council of Trent—and where marriage was a civil contract, permis sion to celebrate them was granted as a matter of course by the Minister of Justice. He would now refer to a country more •resembling England in language and laws—The United States of America:. There it was not only.the opinion of the heads of thglaw, anlohg whOln were Chattcelliir Kent and Mr. Jus tice ROM but also of the bishops of the episcopal Church, LINES , T FIXED AtENTALB. FiatLWArli .11c: (u e . IT:ik f is o ngt r .oh d te ta. arnr6 pc Met Ithloy Clydesiali, Sud. and Hal. E. Lin. H. Sh. Ulas. Barr. & Nails. Direct Do. Now Distr.& Dn Fr Hrtlpl. Dk. & Railway __ Hull & Selby Do. 1 Shares. Do. Shares. Lon. & Groom? Do. Preforeir!e Lon., Til., & S. Lowestoft gr. 4 per cent. Do. 6 per ct. ?ranch. Bxtn and Matlovl Middlesbro' & Redcar all al i 10f.) hikild.Bra Newmarket Bury E. G. spc N. Est.s p.c. Do. 6 rer et. Do. Fixecls p c Prest. & R y: Do. nri. A Roystn.& Hit. Shot', Roth-an Gooleg.s p.c. Shrews. &Her S. Staffordsh. Wear Valley gr per cent Do all all all t;Q Wilts&Gomrst Leasin„ Compan. London & N. We,t. L. &N. W. Caledon E. Un. & E. C (4t.Nrt,n E. Count Caldonistn Wesu Yk. New. & Berm', Y. &NM Do no Is. Easter I Poto & Ca Norfolk Do L.& N. & Hidl(l. Stekton & Darlingt. En. Conn, E. Count. Do.. L. &N.W. • •• ..... Glt Nortim' Laneasliti Yorkth. t. Brassey Vi. - Meican itockt. St Dar!ingt ")o ltWestn. Closing Plies yesterdt: . 95 - 97 94 - 11 - 13 133 - 135 4i la :166 in - 131 .10 - 115 28 - 92 - 94 i - OP 56 - 58 45 -- 47 133 - 1 3 5 3 -23 1 - ••• - ••• 32 - i. 3 PREFE Aberdeen.. De. N 0.2, 7 p Do. Debentures Myth and Tyne 10 per c. pref. (issd. at 50Z Brie. & Ex. 4 P- 0. St. Do. 4 p. c. Shares Caledonian £lO Ches.&llo.Qu.si pc Do. do. Pref. No. 2. Do. do. Pref. No. 2 Cork f4llo.ndonsp.c Dun-Prth .4.Aber.J. E. Anglian Cls. ASh Do. do. Cis. B 6 p. c. Do. do Cls. C 7p. c. Eas.Co.Ex,spcNo. ; Do. No. 2 . Do. New 6 p. o. St East Un., G. 6 p. c. Do. 51., 10 per cent Do. 161. Del;entr.Sl , . Do. do. 4 per cent.. East Lanca9h.6 p.cts ql.k.W. York. J. sth & ta. 5 p.c. sh, Prth.&Dun.4p.c Furness &5.W.0.5 p.c. treat Northn. 5 p. c )o. 5 p. c. Redeem . at 10 p. C. prom. 10.4}p.e Do. 5 p.c. Scrip, Red. tt 5 p. c. pm... ;t. N. of Scot. lat Pre at. S. , 4W. (Ireland: Do. 4per o. Pref. S It. W.(B. t LI. Exspc )o. con. red. 46 p.c. to. con. red. 4 p. c 16. irrecl. 4p. C. Do. 5 p. c. red. pref Do. do. do. Do. Birm. Pref. Do. Ones ter S p. c. P.S Do. do. 5 p. c. do.. Do. Birm. Qua. Stk Do. Ches. Qua. Sh Do. do. do Do. do. do Lan. &York. F. £2 Do. 6p. o. Stock . f,on.& Brigh. 0.5p.t Do. Pref., 5 p. c. Si Do. New Gaar.6 p. Do. do. 5 per cent Gm. &N. W., Cov. 6 sTnueaton 5 p. et. on.& 5.W.7 per ct .ondy. tr, Color. ISh I,ondy.&Enp S )o. £8 arypt .& Carl. 4 p h). 4 per cent 100 vild.Consol.6 /On I Po. Con.llr.l-iir.6pc 100 Do. 4i p. c. Pref. ali Do. Pref. 43 per cen all Po. 5/. Prof. 4 p. c. 100 Ditto L. & 11. Pref. Si / New., Aber., &c., 5 p. c. red. 5 Pm. - Pm- Norfolk Debenture Do. Pref. 5 p. a. St of i ll.). 5 p. c. Eat D. Ei per et . pref. 'Do. Way. Val. 5 p. c. North British N. E. Berw, 4 p.c P. Do. do. do Do Lomb 6 p.c Do. do. Quarters Do.Yorkll.& S. Pur North Staffordshire. Ox, Wo. kW.IE / 3 pe Do R. Pref. 101. Sb. Scot. Cent. ,New Pr , South Devon Do. fixed,4li per cowl S. Eastern (Readinp Ann.) of Xi Os. 6d. Do. 4i per cent Do. Fixed 44 p c eh S; Wales Qua. 4 p, c DI. do. 4?; p. c S.Yorksh.4p.c.Guar Stock. & Dar. , 5 p. c Do. do. • do Stock. & Barth g. 5 p. c. till July 1, 'sfs IWaterrd.& Kilk. 6 p ,ENCE SHARES. e.: 1 14-5 84 - 120 119 90 Q 4 = ie 96 - 98 15 - 17 51 - 61 ••• 197 - 112 97 - 102 i f - 12t - 69 - 71 13'6 .113 107 - 109 100 - 102 • 9i - 10; 6 6A 95 97 s 9 91 90 92 98 • 100 9A - 10 16 -17 i 10 - 101 73 75 19 - 94 - 10, 1 4 14i - 154 136 • 138 ••• ..... 4,. 135 - 140 •" - H. ••• - ..• 1-, ~. - ~. 1- 1 5_ - 137 95 97 87.._- 89 ... 103 -105 _O3 -95 5i 1 z . id 98 . 100 I~ - lg 23k - 23 98 - 100 9i -- 10 ... ..... fr ii 2 iipl 2i - 2i ' MINES. 1 all 1 y};ue. .cris ...,. ...... ... ... ... 1 4i4 .;.nirlo Austria. Gold ... ... 10ft 41 Anglo Californian ... 4 $ 7.10 7 ' \ ustrolian l4 1/ 1 1 all kustral iau Cordiller- ... .. 1 all kve Maria 1 all llailen (G , l•Dueby of ... ... (CO all Bltenar. Iron & Coa ... ... 20 ' 14 iiritisb Iron 3 5 '35 264 Bra.zilianlmp.(issue , ' at 1:;5 pm.) 30 all Do. Comes fir Cuisb 3 -- 3i 20 15 Do. St. Johr Del Re , 24 26 1 ; Clarendon Cons. Min Co. of Jamaica k IP 40 all Cobre Copper ...... 5 1 Colonial Gold — ... St. all Copper MM. of EN, 32 36 , 25 all Do. Pref. 74 p. eon 25 27 26 ... if . :opiapo. l6 18 17 2 1 ,!ortun.2. 20 i all . - ilenc..al l4 16 1. all 4.NuggetVedniteg. 1 4 41 all ,- 41. eat Pole-00th . _ 1 14 5 all Gt Wheal Vor Unite , i 1 • 4il 1 all Liberty ' 4 • i 3 all Linares 74 8 71 x d 5 11 Lusitanian i -- 1 7 1 all Aarignita ........ 1 all New Granada i 1 all Nonyeau Monde__ b i 20 all oontgi.Sll.& Le. Min 114 124 5 1 Port Philip 1 all znartz Roc l -. i $ 50 all Ithymney Iron 2l 23 15 I all Do. New 6 -- 8 30 1.3 4antiago de Cuba. 3 34 ... 6e. Sort. Cons. Min. Co. 24 3 1 all 4ontb Australian..., i 4 1 all Do. Scrip. - i 1 1 Do. 10 per cent Prel ... ... ... 44 Pam. S. &L. Min. Co. 24 21 10 I 9 fin Croft . • 4 -- 44 281 all 'Tnited Mexican 3l 41 1 all faller 4 1. all Vest Mariposa 4 1 12s. Vortbing Mining of Australia ... N . 1 all Tuba •.• --- al. MISCELLANEOUS. 25 19 Australian 4grinlt. 31 33 IC all Ans.;raln. Royal Mail ... ... 10 all Berlin Water Works 6 7 50 40 Brit. American Land 5 St. leo C.Do.6p.e•Trix&7a-lY ... ... 140 111 t —...... 1 14 11 100 32 Canada. 1114 St. 100 Do. 6 p.c. Feb & Aug 1094 1104 St. 100 Do.6p.e. Mar & Sept 1091 1104 5 eel (lrystal Palace 3 34 3 5 all Do. Preference 54 sii 54 4 all Crystal Pal. of France ... ... 1 4 Duston Iron Ore.., ' ... ... 20 13 Eastern Steam ... .. . 5 all En.&Aus Cop Sm Co 11 2 if St. 100 6'lectrio Telegraph 95 97 1 all Electric Teleg. of Ir „.. ••• 5 all Gen. Iron Sc Collier ... ••• 15 14 Gen. Steam Navigat. ... _ ... 18 all General Screw Steam ... 4 all Lond. Gen. Omnibus 34 -- 31 34 20 10 Magdalena St. Navin •. .. 10 all qed.iteran. Elec. Tel. 8 10 10 9 Aexican&S,A.merien. 54 64 1 all Nat. Pat. Steam Fuel ... _ ... 10 5 •erl' , rel .h ', • s Land , 14 2 .:• - ‘- - 10 • ail Co. Do. 5 2 Do. 8p c P iss at 1 d 4 Bp 24 100 80 New li. &N. S. Land 13 22 1 an 1. P. Australasian._ 30 15 S'r tl a (.iti:atropeStaam _ .. 1 all f)riep •, , 1 Om -' 1 2s. Do. "New Shares' ' 1 ip PM an Pool Per. 1.d.&, Mine. 21 31 60 all Peninsular & Oriental ... ... 661 50 10 Do. New . ........ -..— ••• 1.00 60 Royal Mail Steam ... 70 75 1 all Scot. Austral. Invest. li 11 1 Ditto New i $ 0 25 all -;:0-at'a Austral:La:l , l, 39 , e; Sub --•_,,, . 1 1 4 1 ',(= 1 4.: . :•••;:.,'.,:-, .. ~ 1 5 .-. I 1 1' )`l . 1444 : . it:4., C. 4 an 100 28 \Tar illoutev's laao i 5 16 1.“ V,Go.6l).c,Jigi&Jilly ~, -- 061 •• /1,4, this tay. NEWGATE AND LE ADENHALL. Turkeys, 4s Gd to 8s G 1; Goslings, 5s 6d to 7s 61 each ; Ducks, 380c1 to 4s Od ; wild do., Os Od to 03 to 03 ; rab bits, is to is 6d each ; Pigeons, 6d to 8d each ; large Surrey Fowls, Os Od to Os Od ; middling, 2s io 3s Od ; Chickens, 2s 6d to 3s 6d ; Capons, 3s 6d to 5s Od ; Hares, 2s 63 to 3s 6d ; Grouse, Os Od to Os to Od each ; Pheasants, Os Od to Os Od ; Partridges, Os 01 to Os to Od'; Guinea Fowls, 2s 9d to 3s 6d ; Roasting pigs, Os Od to N Od each. Ostend fresh butter, 12s Od to 13s Od, and English 12s Od to 16s Gd per dozen lbs. English eggs, 9s to 10303 ; French do., 5s Od to 7s Od per 120. NEWPORT. Beef, from 3s 2d to 4s 4l ; mutton, 3s &I to 4s Gd ; lamb, 5s 4d to 6,3 43 ; veal, 3s 104 to 43 10d; pork, 3s 44 to 4s 8d per 81bs., by the carcase. WiIITECHAPEL. Beef from 3s 4d to 4s 4d ; mutton, 3s 4d to 4s Gd ; lamb, 5s 6d to 6s 2d ; veal, 3s 8d to Is 10d ; pork, 3s 2d to 4s 8d per Blbs. BILLINGSGATE. Turbots, 2s 6,1 to 15s ; Brills, is 01 to 7s each ; Salmon, 2s Od to 3s 6d per lb ; Cod Fish, 2s Od to 5s each Soles, 3d to is 6d per pair; E els, E d to ts per lb; Lobsters,;oB 61 to 3s 01; Crabs, -id to 28 6d ; Whitings, 33 Od to 12s per doz. ; C om mon Oysters, 16s to 20s ; Natives, 48s to 50s per bsh. ; Mackerel, 36s to 40s per 100 ; Smelts ' s Old to 3s 61 per doz.; Skate, 6d to Od per lb; Shrimps, 186 d to 2s 61 per gallon ; Bloaters 5s Od to 8s 01 per 100 ; Fresh Herrings, 14s Od to Os per 100; Scotch do., 01; Sprats Os Od to Os Od per bushel ; Poreys, 2s to 15s each ; Haddocks , 4s to 12s per doz. ; Pike 61 ; Sturgeon, 01 per lb ; Prawns, 38 0,1 to is; Mullets. 6cl to 2s 6d each ; Plaice, fid to is each ; Halibut, 6LI per lb ; Flounders, ls 6d to Os Od per doz. ; salt fish, 2d to 8d per lb. BREAD. The prices of wheaten bread in the metropolis are frona, 91 1 d to lOd; c 4 household ditto, lid to 9d per 4 lb loaf. HIDES AND SKINS. Market hides, 561bt0 6411); 3id to Od ; 611 b to 721 b, 3,d to 4d ; 721 b to 801 b, 4d to 4id ; 801 b to 881 b, lld to 4iel ; 881 b to 961 b, 4!,(1 to 4id ; 961 b to 1041 b, Od to Od ; 1041 b to 1121 b —d to —d ; upwards, —d to —d ; Horse hides, 6s Od to Os Od ; calf skins, light, 2s 01 to 3s Od; ditto, full, 6s 6d to Os Od; Polled Sheep, Os Od to 01 Od ; Rents, 8s Od to 9s Od ; Half brads, 8 s Od to 9s 01 ; Downs, 6s 01 to 8s Od; Shearlings, lld to is Od; Lamb', 2a td to 3s 4d. HAY MARKETS. ' SMITHFIELD.—Meadow hay, 3115 s to 5/ 17s • clover do., 4/ 15s to 6/ 12s ; and straw, 1 / 79 to 1/ 11s per load. A fair average supply, and a moderate demand. CIIMBERLAND.—Meadow hay, 31 18s to 6/ Os; clover do., 4/ 16s to 64 10s ; and straw, 11 70 to 1/ 12s par load. Both hay and straw sold steadily, at full quotations. WHITECHATEL. Meadow hay, 31 10s to 5/ 16s ; clover do., 4/ 18s to 6/ 12s ; and straw, 1 / 6 s to 11 119 per load. Trade steady, at our quotations. Among the experiments which are to be carried out at the engineering works attached to the head-quarters of tlie Royal Sappers and Miners at BrOnlptOß Barracks, Chatham, the formauion of ovens for baking bread and cooking the food of the troops in the open air will occupy the attention of the directors of this corps. Arrangements are being made among the soldiers occupying the huts at Prin ce Ed ward's Bastion for the erection of ovens for baking while the troops are on field service. EXTRAORDINARY DEATH.—At an inquest held on Thursday before Mr. Bedford, on the body of a drayman named Scurry, in the employ of Messrs. Barclay and Perkins, it was stated that the unfortunate man expired from the injuries he received whilst riding on the dray in a state of intoxication. The head of the unfortunate man got between the barrels and the dray, and death was occasioned by the continual jolting of the vehicle,. THE GREAT SEA SERPENT AGAIN. —Captain Guy, of the Imogen, just arrived off Shoreham, from Algo a Bay, describes as follows the great Aea serpent as seen by him and crew, on Sunday, March 30, in lat. 29 11 N., l ong . 34 26 W. :—To-day (March 30), at 11 a.m., the weather being beautifully \ calm and clear, the man at the helm called my attention to something malting down from the S.E. towards the ship on the starboard quarter. I took the glass, and looked in that direction, and immediately saw that it was a large sea serpent ; and when about 400 yards off the ship he altered his course, passing a A - ay to the north. R appeared in sight full 35 minutes, and, had the same appearance that I have be fore seen represented in drawings, but without the hairy mane ; in fact, looked like a very large conger eel, It was full 40 feet long above water, and from tb.s wake he left I should ',fay - 60 feet would not be an exaggeration." , , St. St. 25 100 a.ll 100 100 100 100 100 1.00 LOO 101 1.00 6't 10. 1 100 100 1.00 100 100 100 t.o.c; i pm 13 P I Pll2i Pm Pm 103 7i :MARRIAGE LAW AMENDMENT BILL. The Earl of St. GERMANS -rose to move the second read ing of this bill, and said that although their lordships had in 1851 refused to affirm the principle of one of a similar nature, he thought he was justified, after the lapse of 'five yearS, in asking them to reconsider that principle. In 1842 the other house had refused to allow a noble friend of his to bring in a bill on this subject, but since that time they had allowe I such bills to be introduced. The Archbishop of Dublin had truly observed that every restriction was an evil, and that the bur den of proving its necessity must fall on its advocates. He might therefore fairly call upon the opponents of this measure to show that the legalisation of marriage with a deceased wife's sister would be inconsistent with the wellbeing of the country but as the question had frequently been discussed he might assume that nothing new could be said upon it, and he would answer 'by anticipation some of the arguments kaiust the measure. Several ably men held that the mar riage law of the Jews was not binding upon. Christians. That was the opinion of Bishop Taylor, who said— " For though Christendom was then at the time of the divorce of Queen Catherine by Henry var., much divided, yet before there was almost a general -consent upon this propo. sition, that the Levitical degrees de not by any law of God bind Christians to their observation. I know of but one schoolman (Paludanus) who dissents. By all which it appears what was the state of these marriages under the law of Moses; and yet all the scruple at which weak persons start or-stum ble is derived from that sanction in Leviticus which, in de spite of all reason and all precedents, and all observations whatsoever, they will needs suppose to be a natural and moral law, so making 11 Commandments, for certain it is that the Ton Commandments were to the Jews the sum of their moral law, in which, since some things that were ceremonial were inserted, it is net likely that anything that was moral should be omitted. In the 10 words of Moses there was nothing less than their whole moral law though something more there was." Chief Justice Vaughan took the same view " The Levitical - prohibitions are no general law, but parti cular to the Israelites. As they were delivered to the Jews only by Moses, they bind other nations no more than other laws of the Jews do, as the laws of succession, and inheriting land or goods. They then must be made obligative, if at all, to the generality of Christians by the New Testament; but by what medium Scan that be proved? Were it not for the sta tutes, it would be hard to make out , by persons of what learn ing soever that wo are obliged by the Levitical degrees, for we are not bound by the Judaical law, and how comes th's part to be distinguished from the rest ? I mean those of the Levitical degrees, which are of the Judaical positive law only." A more modern authority, Archbishop Whately, in speaking of the opinion of another eminent prelate also said : "I am certain that he (Bishop Copleston) in common with the very persons who have appealed to what they call ' the Divine law' in this matter, never considered the cere monial or the civil regulations of the Levitical coda as bind ing on us. No one considers himself bound by that to ab stain from the forbidden meats, or from selling land in per petuity, or to require any one to marry his brother's widow. Nay, even what are called moral duties no Christian Legis lature has felt bound in all cases to enforce by its own laws ; disobedience to parents, for instance, and gluttony and drunkenness no one would deny to be moral offences, and yet no'Legislature denounces against them the penalty of death. The whole, therefore, of the appeal to the Mosaic law is ma nifestly irrelevant, even on the showing o f the very persons who have got up this topic of declamation for the purpose apparently of diverting attention from the real points at issue The civil and the ceremonial ordinances of that law can thus far, and only thus far, be taken as a guide, namely, that any which isynot. merely permitted, brit distinctly enjoined in the law, cannot be at variance With the immutable princi ples •of morality." - • - Many learned men, Sir William Jones and Others, held that that these marriages were neither inconsistent with Scripture nor with the well‘bein,g of society, and that they were lawful marriages, and the bast which under some peculiar cirenm stanees, could be contracted. The Americana were not an irreligious or an immoral people ; and would their lordships pretend to set vain apprehensions against their practical. ex perience ? On what ground, therefore, would „the .douse, be Justified in refusing to agree to the present.bill?. .11c might be told-that there was something peculiar in the position of sister-in-law;a but would not the same observation apply -4,6 any. other'fenaale friend of the husband'? And, was it not calumnious to the character of the .parties to say that d ni ing the 'life Ora mati's wife; feelings might ;grow .up, if the marnages :he coow-advocated were lawful, between the latsband .and sister-in-law which did not grow up between hiMandany other` female friend , Some of the most able wriWrs had beld -,thatlhese marriages were desirable, and that no onuiVotild 'make so kind a mother-in-law as the sister of. the deqe4ed. wife, But he did not . rest Lis support of the .bill ea- that , ground,-but he maintained that these marria.gcf ought,liqt r to :be - prohibited un!ess there were some paraincaka4eliglim objection to th m, or unless some overwhelming, soC:iat evil could. be shown as likely to flow from them. .The‘petitioners iirfavotir of - the bill had petitioned Parliament in the Most respectful terms, bad invited discussion on. the trihj ct,.end had_exeited a considerable feeling in their fayear ticiougheut the thinking and moderate classes. lie bad already alluded to:the fact, -glowing the growing sentiment infavour.of these luarliages, that the bill on the subject 1711W'rejt6,1 in ;the 'Houses of C,ammons in 1842, and sent Up - tea - heir lor.Kipa,in 1849. It was said by some that it was .not worth while "to legislate for so small a nuMber of persons, bict he assured their derclahipi that the number was not so small ; but tri the exist ;Mg state of the kw many persona were reluctant to in Ake _known that they had contracted these num:a:4es .; and seye - rad. of these marriages likewise were contracted . by liers,ona s in humble - eireumstatees, and were not, therefore - ,:easily aseer dainal le. Nevertheless, it was known that a N - ff.5t,44 , 44) of . thewmarriages Lad taken place, and the - number wag increas .irrg, and, cons quently, by refusing to sanction them the vslature w;is laying up a large stock of futurereiwv,and li tigation. Though there might be some dotibt te-the-lega lity:of these marriages con t rac t e d by p e iS an a going atread for:the "purpose, he was told that in the c a se of a bone frcte abroad, Sir F Kelly and other lawyerahad held that there could be - no doubt as to the legality of . the mar riages. He would next call the attention of their lordships • to the observations of Sir W. Blackstone with regard to the necessity of obeying the law : - `i"lt3s-bald; it is true, and very justly, by tire principal of our ethical writers that human laws are binding on men's consciences;- but if that were the only or - ,most foreible obligation, the good only would regard the laws, and the bad would set them at defiance. And, true as this principle is, it mast still be understood with some restriction. It holds, I apprehend, as to rights, and that when the law has deter mined the field to belong to Tertius it is matter of con science no "lenger to withhold or to invade it. So, also, in regard to . natural duties, and such offences as are mater in se. Here we-are bound in conscience, because we are bound by superior laws, before those human laws were in being, to perform the one and abstain from the other. But in relation to those laws which enjoin only positive duties and forbid only such things as are not matt in se, but viola proltibita, merely annexing a penalty to non-compliance, here, I appre hend;:ainseienee is no further concerned than by directing a submission to the penalty in case of our breach of those laws, for otherwise. the multitude of penal laws in a State would not only be looked on as an impolitic, but would also be h very wicked thing, if every such law were a snare for the consci ence of the subject. But iu these cases the alternative is of fered to every man, either abstain from this or submit to such a penalty,' and his conscience will be clear whichever side of the alternative he thinks proper to embrace. Thus, by the statutes for preserving game a penalty is denounced against every unqualified person that kills a hare. Now, this prohibitory law does not make the transgression a moral of fence; the ouly obligation in conscience is t o sub m it t o the penalty if levied." - He bad noW fnlfilled a task which he bad undertaken much against his will, -Ho 'had no personal interest in the ques tion ;. he bad no friend who was interested in it ; and when his right hon. friend the Recorder of London, a few years ago; asked him to take charge of the bill which passed through the other house, he had declined. But since that time, hay. ing given greater consideration Ito the subject, he had seen the necessity of a revision of the present law, and had con sented to take charge of this measure. The noble earl con. eluded by moving -that the bill be read a second time. The Bishop of OXFORD would endeavour to prevail upon the house to vote by a large majority that the bill of his noble friend should not get a second reading :then ; but that it should be read a second time that day six months. Feeling as he did that they were bound to maintain those great eafo. guards to demeStic purity which had been handed to them by those who liadgone before them, and which they in turn ought to transmit to those who should come after them— (hear, and cheers)—in his opinion, a preliminary objection to the bill of his-noble friend was, that it either went too far or did,. not go far enough, and that, if passed, its ,effeet woU'idThe to pnli the law iu opposition to itself. In the Act of Uniformity the Legislature took up the Rubric of the Established Chnrch, and Ecclesiastical statutes .were still held by tho courts. In the original _attempt to deal matter now before the Louse,_ it, was pro posed to make - the elergy of the Established Church do what the ecclesiastical law rendered it impossible for them to do, 'namely., perform such marriages when applied to ; just as they - would any nianiage which was cow permitted by law. However, it had been found idipcissible to maintain such a proposition as that ee the face of Parliament, beeanse on the one hand the — eleivenian - Would haVe been subjected to .penalties if_ he performed. .such a marriage ; and on the -other, he -would be subjected to penalties if - tae refused. (Heat, leati:) --- theil followed the unstatestuan-like proposi tion of his noble friend to leave it optional with the clergy - man whether he - would' perform the marriage. - The absurdity of such - legisletion - as' that had bees exposed to their lord ships. (Hear, hear.) By the .bill now before ehe house his noble friend - proposed to leave the clergy of the Established Church of England and the clergy - of the Established Church - of. Scotland under the ecelesieglical law to which they were new subject. Now; the ecclesiastical law-dieclered that those unions which the noble earl sought to,legaliso were contrary to the law of.. God —it declared that they were .not marriages at all ; it - declared that they were Incestuous concubinage. (Hear, hear.) He was not at present saying whether that was a right, or a wrong view ; but he was .recording that which was the present view of the Established Church of EnglAd. lie believed it was tho view of the Established , ChurCh of Scotland also ; but beyond all doubt the Established Church of England declared that those particular unions were contrary to the law of God—(bear, hear)—and the service of the Church of England declared that any. union which was - contrary to the law of God was no union whateVer." His noble friend would not dispute that in the ecclesiastical courts of this country there would be no difference of opinion on that matter ; nor would the noble earl maintain that the children of such a marriage would be legitimate. (Hear, hear.) Yet what did his noble friend propose to do 1 He - Would have re course to a new statute; declaring these marriages lawful, but he would leave those statutes which enforced the ecclesiastical law unrepealed, and, consequently, leave the clergy unehel tered from the consequences of all the ecclesiasticaljews— canons, rubric . , and service—which declared those marriages to be contrary to the law of God and to be incestuous concu binage. (Hear.) How was the Church to treat the clergy who would perform thee:, marriages? Was it to treat them as living in unity with the Church I Was it to administer to them the different rites of the Church? Again, in a suit for the 'restoration of conjugal rights, would the ecclesiastical court recoenise such a marriage ? (Hear.) Tee clergyman celebrating one of these marriages would, under a law which his noble friend propOsed to leave uurepealed, be subject to tire severest censures of the Church ; but if this bill .passed a clergyman'Cotad hiniself go before a civil magistrate `and Contract such a marriage without being liable to any penalty whatever. (Hear.) Were their lordships prepared to put the clergy in such a false position ? Such a bill at best would put 'the clergy under one legislative regulatiOn and the laity under another. (Hear) On this ground alone be ,would ask their lordships to throw cut the bill by a large majority. (Cheers.) - As regarded the Scriptural question, he 'thought his noble friend had been rather inconsistent; for he . first urged that the Levitical law was not binding os Chris tians at all, and : then proceeded to show that those mar riages were not forbidden by the Levitical law; (Hear.) H e (the Bishop of Oxford) was qitituready to admit, so far, the Levitical law was a municipal or ceremonial law -it was bind- . ing only on the people'for whom it was made—the Jews; but that was the only sense in which he could admit that. he Levitieril law - - was not binding on us as Christians. Wheree' ever it was capable of proof that the law spoken by, Golf to the Jews was not a municipal or ceremonial' law; but an exposition of God's will for man, there that- exposition of His will for man was just as binding ou us as it was on the Jewish people. Now, he ;Would direct:the attention of the house to words in - the 18th chapter of Leviticirse—the chapter so often referred to—which were everds of awful caution to the children of -Israel, and who to crimes . which had been committed by those had inhabited the land in which they (the Israelites) then were before they had been 'put in possession of it. The words were, " All these abominations have the men of the laud done who were before you, and the land is defiled." Now, the caution given in the chapter to which ho referred had no application till it was connected withilie-peOPle:who had bees in the land before the Jews; while if the caution Were merely municipei, it could have no application to those former inhabitants. Those acts, when done by a people not having nay revealed law, were said to defile tite-land, and he believed they wouldhetoue t b o .. .ing one of the great rules- w hich - God had laid. -loon for his creatures, and not as a mere munic i p al law fo r th e gnidance of the Jews, if they now saaCtio ned the chan g e -wi th respect- marriage proposed by his noble friend. Tile - authority of Sir w: Jones had keen:referred toebut that greatOrientaseholar .had only referred to that enionwhich in the- sight of God was incestuous cencubinage -not to-hely marriage. But he (the Bishop of Oxfordewould appeal to thneonsisteutjudgment of the Church of Christ in all its purest ages. His noble friend had saidthatethey-ought not to use the principle of analogy. But unless they adopted that principle they could not say that a father should not marry his own daughter. The chapter in Leviticus contained no prohibition against au uncle marrying his own niece in blood.,_The prohibitions were all taken from the side of the man. There was-a prohibition against the son marrying his mother, and conversely a mother was prohibited from Marrying her son. The nephew might not marry his aunt, and conversely the aunt ought net to marry her nephew.' It, .was the same with respect to the particular relationshipinciuded in_ he noble earl's measure. So far as the letter of the NeW Testament went, there were two pas. sages which-bornen the subject. There was—first, that - re." hating to Herod's marrying hiebrother's wife. Sheliadleft her husband in his life-terne, but there was no proof to:shoerthat he was living when she married his brother. The other in 'stance was that mentioned in the first of the Corinthians, where a man was ordered' by the apostle to be cast out be- • cause he had married his father's wife. That was a case of affinity, not of consanguinity. It might be that the father was alive at the time, but where was the proof ? He, on the other hand, found that there was a strong probability that the father was not' aliee at the time. It would seem that the Christians at that early period were puffed up by having, as they conceived, the liberty of breaking through the Mosaic law, and the apostle said that they must not glory in an im munity which was their shame. He believed that the correct conclusion to be drawn from those two passages in the NeW Testament was, that these marriages were equally forbidden between parties connected by affinity as well as by consau guinity. It was distasteful to him to argue the question on particular texts of Scripture, as if they furniehecl the Chris- _ tian mates sole rule of conduct. He believed that the instructed eye, loOking at God's dealings with his ancient people, would see that the Jews had been raised from a horde of slaves to the dignity of freemen by subjecting them to certain restrictions. • If those restrictions could be traced up to the spirit of God's law, they ought to be regarded as choice and signal blessings. He said that God had restrained his ancient people from prac tices which they had been accustomed to witness in Egypt and amongst the heathen people around them. Those re strictions had been -the means of raising them to a higher state Of civilisation; and he said that the Church of Christ in all ages had truly interpreted the will of God in this respect. Looking at the mysterious attractions which existed between , the two sexes, the law of God, from the very beginning of oar rue; had added restraints upen ehe licence Of union- The,,. change now' proposed - wOuld amount to the removal of a - Most — blessed systems, which had given happiness and purity to ,antes trea t eco- :e, we r ex- T up lours oyal, y Dr. batis- was D, in Dund )able vani -ould lines Veb- he eieg roud rest He en- yor, late ige 6ph ies of ifit 100 all all all all 100 '42s. 214 15 Ail 100 100 tj all all 16 110 all all all all all FOR: :GN. sffi 5 931 i 102 61 i li i 91 f 76 7 11i /