The Sun. — London, England, 1825-07-23 00:00:00

fi/! \4 4 r „.,r„,„.... .--, ; ::. -, . ,e, 0\ : r---- • 1 riz _........, / r t. , ...: • ......: ... ~.•;.- i t : ,::.::; ~•...4 4 ~..6 1. , ,Fr. , .. 7 ' ' ...... ......< . ... 4 -......- Numurn 10,254. SUBSCItIPTION for the VAUDOIS, or WALDENSES. ' -At a MEETING of some of the principal SUBSCRIBERS co the FUND, which is now raising in. England, for the GE NERAL RELIEF o f t h e DISTRESSED VAUDOIb (P rotestant Subj ects o f hi s Majesty the Rini; of Sardinia, whos e ' P r esent state o f extreme poverty creates a new and power fu l s claim upon the b enevo l ence of their fellow Protestants) and e de pecially for th e purpose of enabling them to proceed, withou t lay, to the Erection and Foundation of an Hospital, in aid of which they have received the permission of their Sovereign to solicit f ore i g n . Contributions h eld at' the h ouse o f th e Right lion. Sir George li.' Rose, M.P., May 26, 1825. The Right lion. and Right Reverend the LORD BISHOP of L9NDON in the Chair ; It was unanimously Resolved —That the following persons be requested to form a Committee, for the management of the said fund, and for taking into consideration the best means of applyin g it, in aid of the Establishment of an Ho4pital, in the commune of La Tour, in the valley of L uzerne an d prov i nce of Pigner o l, Piedmon t; and for such other purposes as may he thought expedient by the Committee, consistently with the objects e x p ressed in the Royal Letters Patent stentl of his late Ma jesty Ring George 111., bearing date 1.76t3, viz. : " To en able the Vaudois to maintain their - Ministers, Churches, Schools, and poor tolerabl e , which they are nut able to support in any manner." The Earl of Clarendon G. Harrison, Esq. The Earl of St. Germains Archdeacon Wrangham The Lard Bishop of London The Rev. Dr. Richards The Lord BishopollVinchester The Rev. Dr. Phillpotts The Right Hon. Sir G. 11. The Rev. D r . B urrow Rose, M.P. siev. Dr. Schw Sir T. D. Adana, Bart. M.P. T abe he Rev. Dr. Sumner Sir Thos. Baring, Bart. M.P. The Rev. Anthony Hamilton Lir Robert Inglis, Bart. M.P. The . Rev. Joseph Wigrain Jasper Atkinson, Esq. The Rev. Bewick Bridge Chas. F. Barnwell, Esq. The Rev. Thomas Sims Saml. Bosanquet, Esq. The Rev. I. S. Pons Wm. Cotton, Esq. The Rev. W Hamilt on , E sq. in. S. Gilly With the power of adding to May require. • 'that George Harrison, Esq., Samuel Bonanquet, Esq., the R ev. Anthony Hamilton, who h ave hithert o acted as Trausnt i tees to the Vaudois Food, be requested to continue their ser vices in that capacity. That the Rev. Bewick 13ritige be requested to undertake the office of Treasurer to the Fitod. That the Rev. W. S. Gilly he requested to act as Honorary Secretary to the Committee ; and that the itev: J. S. Pons be requerted to .assist him in conducting the Foreign Corre spondence. That the following Bankers he requested to receive Sub scriptions viz.:— Alessrs. Glyn, Mills, Hallifax, and Co. 1.. Lombar Messrs. Bosanquet, Pitt, Anderdon, Franks 4ge Co. i street.d- Messr s . Masterman Peters, Mildred, and Co. Nich o l as l ane. Messrs. Hoare and ' Co. Fle e t- street. ' Messrs. lierries, Farquhar, and Co. St. Jametrcet. Communications are to be addressed to the Rev. W. S. Gilly, No. 2, Tavistock-place, Russell -square. LIST (TF SUBSCRIBERS. X. s. I ' - ilia 'Majesty, the King 105 0 Arelilip. of Canterbury 2.5 0 Archbishop of York 10 0 Duelishop o f D ublin 10 0 ess of Buccleugh 10 0 Earl of Clarendon - 10 0 Countess of Clarendon 5 0 Earl of Liverpool - 20 0 Eorl of lit. Germain% 10 0 Earl of Rocksavage - 3 0 Countess of Home Dow. C ountess Poulett 1 05 0 Bish o p o f London - 2 0 0 B ishop of lc inchester 1 0 0 'Bish op o f Durham - 52 10 -.Bish o p o f Salisbury . 10 Bishop of Oxford - 5 5 ' Bishop of Ely - 10 0 Bishop of Llandaff - 10 0 Bishop of Litchfield and Coventry - 5 5 Bishop of Bangor - 10 El Bishop of Carlisle - 10 0 Bishop of Hereford - 10 0 Lord reignmouth - Lord B exle - 20 0 3 0 y . Lady Effingham binson Chancellor o f t he E xchequer . 20 0 .11t. HMI Sir W. Grant 10 10 Right lion. Sir (i. 11. Rose, ma). _ .. n P ight Hon, Rd. Ryder, . M.. . 10 0 Bt. Hon. IV. Sturges • Ro nnie - „ 1011 . Mr. Justice Park 5 0 vLady Park - - 2 0 ason The Dean Justice Gaselee 5 0 bean of Winchester 10 0 Dean of Rochester 5 0 4.,‘,. Puiedniontese Noble 1 0 k.O ntess of San Martin HI Motto - Al aril. Charles of Sla-ri Marsan t M arqui s of Prie. Chevalier dal Pozzo 4eld arld, Sir T. Dyke, 1141 ' 111 • P• - 0 0 0 Anderdon T I Bs o 0 1 I 4tlt°t„,"lll4* • 4 - . a --• 20 - 0 - Ditto - - - r, -.. 5 1 0 0 Atkinson, W.-T Auberton, Mrs T . —sq. 2 0 Atherton Alias.- - 1° I) 10 0 Arnedrox, r - Anderson Hey H enry -It'sq. 05 -014(lerson, Air; R. quot aie l e 'n . 5; ()u ;e 3, ,,,. • 1 ((9) filackVui;" t euss - 10 0 lleavan, Bev ' P.: - 50 0 "I'ller, 11%.5. Franci; 20 0 0 -11511 i, Ite ilurt°n, ti:an. A. - 2 0 liurt obi mrs. cis, Esq. 10 0 Burton ' . igiissss 111: - 56 00 ~,BBurke t t , G. ~, - - 1 1 okee, A i i ss 'a s{ l. - 1 0 ti u kne 0 , Thornas Fs a . 1 i ....arowan, c.. . , -, -i. i Beaumont L Esq.l 1 .11erkah.ire,' L+ ip-- 10 0 Con 'f 0 rom by J . A IciTil2eo., EN ' . for . the . QPlta.l 75/. St ., for ration 69/ If ed Baylt4tal • 74.5)1.• sa. 6d. ey, A hd - ,Rl3rltietts Ales. eac on - 2 2 enso n, R e c . e. - 4 0 onrke E. .Esq 1 o xt_a_nqui et: s'ain E 2l: B , l - . I t 1, 1 .„o_aannquet, Mr. Serjeant 5 iion'a_ quet, C. Es. - 10 10 tr,,,nquet, Mrs. e e . o 2 Boordtt' C. li. Esq. 1 1 -, n. 13rownlo w, Iln"' - - , -werbaek - 20 0 .tra(4l,,, , A R ev. T. F,. 5 0 I lrid ge -w ,, , "lug. Esq. 5 0 Ilr, ' ` tev. l ' i ' , .sco, Mrs -- 5 ° -ris eoe 10 i f - ... 1 , iwa,' rut. Esq. ~ 010 )3 uckl e ' Ar• W. 10s. od . lEtu "Ts. dcle It• ' - I U i l t cid " I " 1) • - 44 d, Rev. 1 ,- 0 6 e rt en; it e , •., r. . 1 1 11,t470w„ It o ,: •Vii,'' - 1 1 ItAelori ' --''r. - 5 4 1 Alm ' .- ? c their number, as circumstances 6 5 2 0 - 1 0 - 1 0 1 0 Butterworth, J. Esq. X. 3. M. P. 5 0 Campbell, Rev. A.M. 1 1 Chambers, Robert, Esq. 1 0 Cambridge, Mrs. - 1 0 Chapman, David, Esq. 1 1 Chapman, Miss - 1 0 Charrington, R. Esq. 5 0 Clarke, bliss - 1 elution, J. E sq . - 1 1 Cook worthy, Uri. - 2 0 Cotton, Mrs. Wanstead 20 0 Cotton, Joseph, Esq. 20 0 Cotton, William, Esq. 10 0 Courtenay, Rev. J. 1 0 Currey, H. Esq. - 2 0 Cunningham, Rev. F. 5 0 Cage, Mrs. _ I Cage, Miss S. - Casenov e 1 0 ,J. Esq. - 0 Casenove, H. Esq. 5 . 1 1 Chute, Mrs. - . 3 0 Cordes, C. A. Esq. 1 0 Clementsolliss . - 10 0 Croydon, Mr. - 1 0 Colle c ti on at the Swiss Church, Soho, by Rey. Messrs. Sterky, and Berger Minis ters - 34/. 14s. Collection at Providence Chapel, Gray's Inn lane. 127/. Bs. ; Do. at Salem Chapel, Lei cester, 311. 3s. 6d. ; Do. at Chapel Grantham, 31/. after Sermons, by Rev. J. Charnberlayne. 'To tal ' - 1801. I Is. 6d. D—, bliss - - 5 Danvers, Charles, Esq. 5 ,0 Danvers, M rs . - 2 2 Danvers, C. jun. Esq. 1 1 Danvers, Henry, Esq. 1 1 Daubuz, Mrs. M. - 10 0 Daubuz, Mrs. A. - 10 0 Dare, Hall, R. W. Esq. 1 0 Dodd, Rev. P. S. 3 0 Doxat, Alexis; Esq. 10 0 Ditto, Friends by 42 12 Du Boulay, bliss - 1 1 Du Boulay, Thos. Esq. 1 0 Day, Rev. J. - - 1 0 Dampier, Mrs. . 2 2 Duncombe, Esq. - 10 0 Etonian, An Etonian 5 0 Friend, A - - 1 1 Finch, G. Esq. -21 0 Finch, Miss - - 1 1 Frewens, Miss - 1 0 Fortescue, Hon. Mat. 10 0 Fortescue, Hon. Mrs. 10 0 Francis, C. F. Esq. 1 Frampton, T. Esq. 5 0 Freeling, T. Clay ton,Esq.l 1 Friend, A . 1 1 Gale, Mrs. . - I I Gale, —, Esq. - 1 0 Gale bliss 1 0 Gaskin, Rev. Dr. . 1 I Giberne, Mrs. . 1 1 Giberne, Miss - 010 Giberne, Miss M. - 010 Gilbert, Richard, Esq. 2 0 Gully, Rev. William 5 0 Rev. W. Stephen 5 0 Glover, Rev. W. L ow d er 1 1 Glyn, Messrs. and CO. 5 Godfrey, .1. Gordon Mrs. - -5 0 Goulding, Chris., Esq. 1 1 Goulding, Mrs. Chris. 1 1 Guillelrand, Rev. Mr. 5 5 Gilpin, Mr. - - 5 0 Halford, Hon. Lady 1 1 Haldimand, G. Esq. 5 0 Haldimand, W. Esq. 5 0 Hall, it. W. Esq. - 1 0 Hamilton, W. It. E sq . 10 0 Hamilton, Rev. A. 5 0 Harrison, M r s. - 0 Heath H abig', S Wm. Alers 5' 0 , on, and Co. 5 Berries, Farquhar & C 0.20 0 0 H. Dl rs . and bliss 2 2 Hargreave; O. Esq. 1 1 Harinan„Jeremiah,Esq. 10 0 Harman, Mrs. -5 0 liarrison4 George, Esq. 10 10 Harrison, T. H. Eiri. 0 Harvey, Alra. -2 0 Harvey, - 0 ~_arveY 2 ; Miss I. - 2' 0: waY, M. E. - • I 1 s. Hathaway, Wm. Esq. 1 0 Hesker, Teush, Esq. 2 0 Renshaw, Rev. R. - 1 0 Heron, Mrs. and Miss 2 2 Herries, I. C. Esq. M.P. 10 0 Hoare, Henry, Esq. 21 0 Hoare, Ch. Esq. - 10 0 Hoare, H. Merirk, Esq. 10 0 Hoare, Mri. H. M. 5 0 Hodgson, Th. Esq. 5 0 Hodgkinson, Miss 1 0 Howard, Miss •-• 2 0 Ingleby, John, Esq. 5 5 Jones, Archdeacon 5 0 Inglis, Mrs. Thomas 1 1 Keene, B. Esq. - 5 0 Keene, Rev. C. - 1 1 Keene, Mrs. C. - 1 1 Keene, Miss - 5 0 Ketniie, Miss - - 1 1 --,nick, Mrs Kenria, Mrs. - 1 1 Kilner, Mrs. and Miss 3 3 Lamb, Rev. J. - 1 1 Ladies, Three - 8 0 Lady A - - 1 1 Lane, Rev. C. 10s. 6d. Laprimaudaye, Rev. C. 5 5 Lawson, C. Esq. - 1 1 Leader, W. Esq. M.P. 1 1 Lee, Professor - 1 _1 j i e e m wt ° o l3 n ß liev. E. Es 0 10 .1 - 1 1 Lind, F. Esq. - 2 2 Lind, Mrs. 1 1 Litt, W. P. Esq. 1 1 Lonsdale, Rev. J. • . 1 1 Le Bas, Rev. C. B. 1 0 L. A. - - 10 0 - - - - Lupton, Thos, Esq. 1 1 Mc. Nevan, C. Esq. 1 1 Mascall, Mrs. 1 0 Alascall, Miss - 010 Moore, Rev. Dr. - 2- 0 Mackworth, Sir D. Bt. 2 0 Mandel, Rev. William 1 0 Mapletoft, Rt. Esq. 10$. 643. Maud, T. Esq. - 1 1 Middleton, B. Esq. 3 0 Mildred, Daniel, Esq. 5• 0 Mildred, D. jun. Esq. 1 1 Mercer, Rev. T. Warren 1 1 Mercer, llrs. - 1 1 Morris, C. jun. Esq. 5 0 Moysey, Archdeacon 1 0 Nesstield, Rev. W. 2 2 Newcome, Rev. Thos. 2 2 Nares, 'Archdeacon 5 5 'heave, Rev. H. S. 2 0 Neyle, G. N. Esq. 5 0 Norris, Rev. A. H. 10 0 .Okes, Rev. Dr. - 1 Pace, Rev. 'Virm. - 1 1 Parker, Rev. Wm. - 1 1 Paris, the Misses - 6 0 Pearse, B. Esq. - 5 0 WILLIAM STE: SATURDAY EVENING, JULY 23, 1825 Vii .11/4LLING-et JC.6, J u ly 21, I Bis. f r .. . COMMISSIONERS for VICTUAL LING His MAJESTY'S NAVY, i-e. do hereby give Notice, that on Friday, the 29th ,Instant, they will be ready to receive Tenders in writing (sealed up), and treat for" Thirty - Tons of OATMEAL One Hundred - Na r S I C . O E V R. AI)O SUGAR. • Ten - .. Twenty - - CHEESg AV/ y - , COCOA Thirty - .: VIRGINIA LEAP' TOJIACCO To be delivered into his Illaj,sty's' rid al/ling Store, at Deptford, one-stqf by the Ist September, and the remainder by the lat Octo ber n cal, _ _ Samples of the Otthnefl, of not less than two quarts each, and of the Sugar and Cocoa, of not less than three pounds weight each, will he required to he prodneed with the Ten ders tOr the supply of those articles respectively. The Conditions o/ the Contracts mail he seen at this Wire. Each Tender must specific the Price in words at lengths, and he delivered before One o' Clock -on the day appointed; and the Person who maker the Tender, or some Person on his behalf, must attend to answer when called for M. ff:II,I,F,R CIIFTON. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, JULY. IN RE FRANK, A LUNATIC. The LORD CHANCELLOR heard an application inthis matter in his private room. NOTIONS. • His Lounsu IP stated, that as next Tuesday was "seal-clay, he wished it to he understood that he should hear no motion of which notice had not been previously given ; ,and, with re ferrence to the extension of the seal; he should not allow, unless under particular circumstances, a motion to be . brought in of which notice had not been given - before the seal-day BowEy V. STRATHMORE. His LORDSHIP made some observations ispon this case, but without giving judgment, which he deferred till to-morrow, when it was his intention to go at length through the evidence in this important case. His Lordship remarked that the Master of the Rolls had dismissed the petition (though without costs) for want of jurisdiction ; but it might appear that the Court, under all circumstances, had a civil jurisdiction, by virtue of whiCh the money obtained from the hands of the Court by the process stated in the bill might be diricted to be replaced in stutu. quo. The case, therefore, stands for judgment to-morrow. ALLEN V. GLYNNE. Mr. HEALD was heard on behalf of the defendant, Thomas Gwynne, who possessed the estate through his father John Gwynne. Mr. Heald re-capitulated the facts, which showed that no fraud was imputable to the devisee under the will of David Allen. The object of the testator was not so much to benefit John Gwynn,-, as to disapppoint his own family, of whom he had so much reason to complain ; he therefore gave the estate in succession to GwYnne's brothers, in case the de visee should die before him. The plaintiff never had any equity in the case, and had no remedy at law. Mr. Heald mentioned an instance of an Attorney becoming the devisee of the client, in spite of refusal on his part ' • but when the testator di e d, th e magnanimous Attorney called together the relatives of the de ceased, and divided the estate amongst them to the last farthing. Such was the feeling of the gentlemen of the county where the lawyer resided (the East Riding of Yorkshire, not a great way from Beverley), that they gave him so much employm e nt, that he speedily.realsed a larger fortune than he had given away. This was noble conduct ; but others were r. ;t to be charged with fraud if they did not choose to imitatOlt. Mr. BicKERSTET followed on the same side. • , Mr. HART replied. The LORD CHANCELLOR observed, that this was a very important case. The trial of the action of ejectment had been: of no use, and it did not appear that an issue could now be pro perly sent to a Jury. His Lordship proceeded to remark, that there was some appearance of advantage taken of the 'elder len; but the transaction was so old, that it was unsafe for the Court to meddle with it, after the lapse of half a century. The smallest circumstance might make out the fraud, and .a very small circumstance might turn ti.i scale 'the other way. His Lordship thought that when the deed of compromise - was exe cuted, David Allen and Gwynne were intent upon the will.— The Court could not say that an-attorney could, not-take a de. vise or bequest of his client's estate, or provide that if he .died the gift should go to his brothers, whom the testator did not know. He thought that Gwynne had acted indiscreetly in let ting his clerk copy the will front his own draught, and locking up the original in hii closet, without giving his client a copy. His Lordship,considered that the Court had jurisdiction to say that if the will had been vitiated by the finding of a Jury, the fine would not avail ; but the true question was, whether the fine could be connected with the alleged fraud. The fine need not have been levied on account of the lady Air. Gwynne was about to marry, had the will been good. It was necessary for the Court to go carefully through the pleadings, and consider of all the circumstances found there: The case was not only important, but not very easy to.decide. His Lordship then ad dressed a serious admonition to the solicitors of the Court, ob serving, that nothing was more delicate than fur an attorney or a barrister to appear as the abSolute devisee or legatee in a client's will. He hoped they would lay this seriously up in their remembrance. DEVAYNES V. NOBLE. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL, suggested that as this appeal would occupy much time, and as only two days for appeals re mained, it would be better that it should stand over till after the long vacation ; which his Lordship agreed to. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Jur.l.- 22. DUNBAR AND OTHERS V. BALDER° AND OTHERS. This case came before his Honour upon exceptions to the Master's report, and involved a question upon the construction of a will under the following circumstances. The testator, Mr. Grey, a gentleman who had realized a fortune in the East - Indies, bequeathed the Sum of 20,0001. to the plaintiff's, as trustees, to be applied to the erection of an Hospital at Elgin, in Scotland. Ile also bequeathed the interest of 6,0001. to his sister, Mrs. Williamson, for her life ; and 4001. "to each of her children who might be living and unprovided for by mar riage at the time of her death ;" the residue to be applied to the support of the intended institution. After the will was proved the 6,0001. were paid into Court by the trustees, and Mrs. Williamson continued to receive the interest during her life. Upon her death, a petition was presented to the Court to declare who were entitled to the legacies of 400/. under the will of Mr.. Grey. It was referred to the Master, and he reported that Mrs. Williamson had left several daughters and one son living, of whorls he considered the son, and one of the daughters who was a widow, to he excluded by the terms of the will from any claim under it; the others, being unmarried daughters", were clearly entitled to 400/. each. To this report the son and widow excepted ; and contended by their Counsel (Messrs. Horn and Wyatt) that under the words " children unprovided for by marriage," they also were entitled to similar legacies ; for the son had not been married at all, and the widow's hush band being dead at the time of Mrs. Williamson's death, she, too, was then unmarried. Besides, she must be considered as unprovided for, having only a trifling income of DOI. a-year. Messrs. SHGDEN and RO3ll r. LI", on behalf of the trustees, argued that the testator -had no intention of bequeathing lega cies to any sister's children, except her daughters,who were un married at the time of her death ; fo r i n anot h er part o f h is will, after complaining of his sister's foolish marriage, which had obliged him to support her family for 20 years, and re. main ten years longer than he intended in India, he said, " I have left small legacies to my sister's children, in order that they may not, in their turn, bedome the prey of unprincipled men." It was clear, therefore, from these words that he did not mean to include his sister's sons, as t h ey could not become ' 6 the prey of unprincipled men," And with respect to the widow being unmarried at the tune . of h er mot h er ' s d eat h, i t was decided in several cases .reported Vev e y, t h at t h e wor d " unmarried" meant " never having been m arr i e d." The VicE-CHANceN.Lon. over-ruled the exception with re spect to the son, whom he considered the teietator did nut con template as a legatee; but his Honour tion allo we d th e exce respecting the widow ; for, although he agreed with the deci sions in those cases which had been cited, yet i n t h e present case the widow was in that situanon(alth oug h not, per h aps, ttt siou isters), to s ), become which by in an equal degree with her lees experienced n erieri seemed to have in view—namely,:i marriage the prey% o f an u nprincipled man ; and she could not be said, from the trifling income lie poeessed, to 'be pro; vided s. Phillpotts, Rev. Dr. - 5 0 . Pons, Rev. I. S. - 3 3 Powell, Rev. W. 1 0 Pratt, Rev. J. - 1 1 Prevost, A. S. Esq. 5 0 Prince, Rev. I. - 1 1 Proctor, Rev. Dr. - 1 1 Powell, Rev. H. - 2 2 Pusey, Hon. P. - • 30 0 Richards, Rev. Dr. - 3 0 Rivington, Messrs. - 2 0 Rundall, Mrs. M. A. 1 0 Rushout, Hon. Anne 5 0 Russell, J. Somerset, Esq.l 0 Russell, Mrs. - 1 0 Richardson, Rev. Dr. 2 2. Shepherd, Miss M. A. 'lO 0 Sansom, Miss - 2 2 Saunders, John, Esq. 5 0 Saunders, J. Esq. jun. 1 1 Saunders, Miss - - 010 Scott, Rev. Mr. - 1 1 Scott, Sirs. - - 1 1 Sims, Rev. Thomas 10- 0 Smith, Mrs. - 'lO 0 Shepherd, Rev. Dr. 2 0 Sleech, Mrs. - 2 2 Turner, Rev. Richard 2 0 Telford, G. Esq. 1 0 Trigge, Lady - 5 U Tomlini, Sir T. E. Knt. 1 0 Townsend,, Rev. Geo. .1 1 Thrale, Miss - - 2 0 Turton, Rev. Professor. 1 1 Turner, Frewen, Esq. 5 0 Turner, Mrs. Richard 10 10 Vachell, S. Esq. - 5 0 Vansittart, Miss - 10 0 Valpy, Rev. Dr. - 2 0 Vardon, Miss - 1 1 Vardon, W. Esq. 2 2 Vincent,, Col. - 3 0 Waller, Sir W. Bart. 2 0 Watson, Joshua, Esq. 10 10 Welstead, Ch. Esq. 1 0 Whennel, —, Esq. 1 U White, J. B. Esq. 1 1 Wigram, Sir R. Bart. 10 0 Wigram, Miss - 2 0 Wigram, Rev. Joseph 2 0 Wilkinson, Rev. J. B. 1 1 Williams, Mrs. - 2 0 Willis, A. Esq.. - 2 2 Wilson, Rev. William 10 0 Wilson, Rev. Daniel 5 0 Wilson, Rev. W. C. and Friends - r 50 0 Second Subscription from Friends, by for Schools - 20 0 Wilson, J. Esq. - 1 1 Whitfield, Rev. W. B. 1 1 Vlrilson, T. B. Esq. 10 Wrangham, Archdesson 1 1 GILLY, lion. Sec. DISH'S LUCK, AS USUAL ! ON FRIDAY, the 15th Inst. the Drawing of the State Lottery took place at Cooper's Hall, when BISH'S Offices were, as usual, very successful, as he Sold and Shared 3,613 (Class B) £21,000 9;776 (Class B) £21,000 • 8,687 (Class A) £2,000 4,837 (Class B) £1,050 71# latter Ticket was also.cntitled to 16 Pipes of Wine ; and it is in the recollection of the Public that BISII added to the late Scheme, as a free gift from himself as Contractor, Four Grand Prizes of Wine ; this Ticket was one of them, and BISH will allow the Holders of the Wine Prizes to select the very best 'Tine they can_pick out from th e St oc k o f an y Wi ne Merchant in the United Kingdom, and he will pay for it, and send it, Carriage free, to wherever the fortunate Holders re. side; or if they prefer Money instead of Wine, BISH will pay.in Money for the Prizes.whatever the very best Wine would coat. Exclusive of the above, BIM . also sold on 15th Instant, Four other Capitals ; and in the Eight preceding Months he sold Three Prizes of £30,000, Nos. 1,804, 2,478, and 15,756; Four Prizes of £20,000, Nos. 699, 7,034, 15,301, and 15,556 ; besides Prizes of £lO,OOO, £2,000, &c. &c. ; and there is scarce . a Town in the United Kingdom that has not partaken of BISH'S unparalleled success. BISH regrets that Lotteries draw very near their final close ; but he is happy in having before that event takes place, to lay before them a grand Scheme, which contains Four novel rich Prizes of £25,000 each, and various other Capitals, with all the other rich points that BISH'S late Scheme pos sessed. ALL to be drawn in ONE.DAY, 31st of NEXT 111ONTH, (AUGUST). Tickets and Shares are Selling at BISII'S Offices, 4, Corn hill, and 9, Charing-Cross ; and by his Agents in the Country. Schemes, Gratis. This Day was published, price Is. A REFUTATION of the MIS-STATE. A :ITEM'S, contained in an Anonymous Pamphlet, dona tively circulated by the LONDON DOCK COMPANY, en titled " Cautionary Observations to those who contemplate an Investment of Property in New Docks," accompanied by some Useful Information to the Proprietors of the London Docks; and proving, conclusively, that the St. Katharine Dock Com many will possess the means of dividing 161. 2s. 6d. per cent. upon investment. _ London ; Printed for J. M. Richardson, 23, Cornhill. To prevent the Sco r chi ng R ays o f t h e S un Affecting the Skin is by the Use of this Infallible Specific, ROWLAND'S KALYDOR, which immediately allays the smarting irritability of the Skin, pioduces a delightful and pleasing coolness truly comfortable ; removes Freckles, Pimples, Spots, and all Cutaneous Erup tions. It imparts a luxuriant and matchless beauty to the complexion ; affords soothing relief to Ladies nursing their off spring. To Gentlemen after shaving, it allays the irritation and smarting pain, and renders the skin smooth and pleasant. That ROWLAND'S KALYDOR elicits these felicitous re sults one trial will suffice to prove, and satisfactorily establish its reputation. Sold in Bottles, at 3s. 6d. ' 75., 10s. 6d., and 21s.•per Bottle, by the sole P ro p r i etors, A. Rowland and Son N 0.20, Hatton (garden; and by a p po i ntment, by most Perfumers and Medi cine Venders. Ask for Rowland's Kalydor. As there are Imitations, see the Signature " A. ROVVLAND and SON." /NERVOUS COMPLAINTS, and DEBILITY. T HE late celebrated Dr.FOTHERGILL, in the course of his extensive practice, encountered re peatedly such oistressing cases of Nervous Complaints, that he was 'minced tf- direct his principal attention to the disco vering an effect nal remedy, the invaluable Medicine here of fered to the Public attention, under the 'title of " Dr. ro thrreill's Net von , Drops," was the result of his efforts. To those who are afflicted with Nervous disorders, and their va rious distressing affections, as Oppression of Spirits, Head Aches, Loss of Appetite, Indigestion, Spasms, Tremo r s, Fainting Fits, and Debility or Relaxation of the System, it is confidently recommended to have reconrse to the above m e di c i,,e, by which they ate assured of obtaining immediate relief, and -by a due perseverance in it. aereebly to the di tedious given. the complete re.cstablishment of their health. Sold in Bottles, at 4 s. 6 d.; 1 Iz. and /is by Butler, Che mist, 4, Cheapside, St. Paul's ; Savory and Co. 1:36, New Bond-street, London ; and by the Principal Medicine Venders throughout the United Kingdom. of u .b„,„ io n) he had, Dr. FOTHEBOILL'S TONIC FE MA LE 11 LLS, 'JAM] particul ,rot,lr in diseas es t o wt,icit Females, more especially t habit,. In 13.,x , ,5, tit Is. 44. ai,J Cs. Pd., ~: c, ~~. '~ ~-,. ASSIZE 'INTELLIGENCE. LINCOLN, WEnamsnAY, JULY 20. Before Mr. Justice HOLIWYD. Jobt Royte, aged 30, was found guilty of robbing on the highway, - J. Bellamy; and taking threel /. country bank-notes and 'silver to the amount of IL.—Sentence Of death recorded. THURSDAY, JULY 21. Trroz. Wright, aged 32, was capitally indicted for the wilful murder of his wife, at Great•Grimsby, in this County. Rolsert Hill, a journeyman in-the service of the prisoner, who is a hair-dresser, was sent by him on the 2d of 31ay to dress a gentleman's hair at the White Hart. Witness went, - btit - found nobody there. On his return he remonstrated with the-pri soner for having played him such a trick. Soon afterwards the prisoner took up a comb and a pair of scissors, and said he was gning.to cut a gentleman's hair. He was at this time fresh-, neither drunk nor sober. His wife begged him not to go out. She. was standing between him and the door. He stretched. Out his hind as if to put her aside ; but without any great vio. knee.. She struck the prisoner on -the urm with a hammer.— After receiving the push,.-she sat down, and witness perceived that she was bleeding... He said to the prisoner, " What have you donal• • Yon -havellied your wife." Hereplied4 " I hope I have not hurtlier•" and then begged witness to go for doctor. The blow appeared have been given at the lower part a the• .woman's belly. The scissors- were such as are commonly used. by hairdressers. Ann Mason was looking through the window of the prisoner's house, and saw the push given by the prisoner. to his wife, which she described to the same effect as the last witness. Wit ness helped to place the deceased in a chair. The prisoner ex pressed great sorrow for having hurt his rife. He appeared to be intoxicated. This happened on a Monday, and' the deceased died on the following Friday. . E. Lanidon, a surgeon, found the deceased wounded in the lower extremity of the abdomen. There was little blood then about the wound, but it appeared thut a profuse hemorrhage had taken place, which had been suddenly stopped. On open ing the body, the - wound was found to be about half an inch deep, and.a quarter of an inch.in width. The death of the wo man was occasioned by internal hemorrhage. Two witnesses swore that the prisoner was a . man of weak intellects, and was frequently teased by the boys of the town. He was neither cruel nor violent, but when in liquor was per fectly insane. The JUDGE left it to the jury to decide whether there was ani r r e ile t n ry ce fo of u nall i e afo o re t tu a l t h y t against the prisoner. An indictment for manslaughter, which had been preferred against the prisoner, was withdrawn. James Ingram was capitally indicted for a violent assault on the person of Anne Clarke. _ _ The prosecutrix, the wife of a labouring man, gave her evi dence, when the Court intimated that unless the case could be carried much further, the Jury could not convict. The Counsel for . the prosecution said they had no other ma rial evidence. Upon which the Jury found the prisoner Not -A mob of infamous women, who were waiting outside the Court brutally ill-treated the prosecutrix as she quitted it, and before she was rescued from their hands, her clozaes were near ly torn off. 13/Are Mr. Justice PARK. Joseph Walker was indicted for stealing ten sheep, the pro perty of Thomas Slater, a farmer in this county ; and John Ashton and William Andrews, for receiving the same, know ing them to have been stolen.—They were found Guilty. Mr. Justice Patty ordered sentence of Death to be recorded against Walker, intimating to him at the same time, that al though his life would be spared, he would be sent out of the country for his life. He then sentenced the other two prisoners to transportation for 14 years. CIVIL SIDE, WALKER v. BAINBRIDGE Mr. Serjeant VAUGUAN stated this to be an action to recover compensation by the plaintiff for defamatory words spoken of him by the defendant. The plaintiff was a respectable farmer, and a tenant of the Earl of Brownlow. In May, 1324, he attended, as was usual with him, at the fair of Kirton, and purchased there three, calves, which bad been in his possession without the least attempt at concealment from that time to the present. The defendant, who is also a farmer of considerable substance, having lost a calf, charged the plaintiff with having stolen it, and fixing upon one of the beasts bought at Kirton fair, claimed it to be his. This charge the defendant made in the presence of the plaintiff 's servants. The plaintiff did all in his power to convince the • defendant of his innocence. He permitted him to inspect his beasts, and he advertised in the county paper for the person of whom he had bought them. The defendant, however, still persisted in his charge, and a pplied to a Magistrate, who,, upon hearing the plaintifri'statement, dismissed the case. He then issued a summons from the Court of Requests for the supposed value of the calf which he pretended to have lost; and, as a last aggravation of Ids misconduct, he pleaded a justification to the action now about to be tried, in which he repeated the offensive charge he had made against the plaintiff. There were, in this case, none of the excuses which were commonly made for intemperance of language ; because, even if the defendant had once been influenced by ill temper or irritation, he had had time enough to have cooled himself, and he would not, as he had now done, .up to the very moment of trial, persisted in re peating the imputation, which was not less injurious than it was untrue. Witnesses were then called, who proved that the defen dant said to the plaintiff, " Your are a rogue; you never bought it (the calf); you stole it, and you'll be taken up for it before to-morrow night.". • Several other witnesses proved they had been present when the plaintiff purchased the beast at Kirton Fair. Mr. CLARKE, for the defence, submitted to a verdict, but recommended the Jury .to give small damages for the offence which the defendant was charged to have committed, and which had arisen from no against the plaintiff, but proceeded from his irritation at having lost a valuable beast. The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, damages 201. CHELMSFORD, JULY 21. ( Before Mr. Baron GRAHAM and Special Juries.) NELSON AND ANOTHER V. GRIFFIN. This was an action for words of slander spoken by the de-. fendant of the plaintiff's, in their trade and "business of coach_ proprietors, imputing to them insolvency.--Plea, the general issue. The plaintiffs (Mrs. Nelson, a widow, and her son) are ex tensively engaged in the business of stage-coach owners, and the defendant is landlord of the Ipswich Arms Inn, at Ingate_ stone, in this county, and is also a coach proprietor. In the month of October last, 111 r. Benson, a farmer, of West Hanningfield, arrived at the defendant's house in his way to London, and inquired of the defendant how he could get to London. The defendant replied, that he might as well go by his coach. I►lr. Benson said, " No, I have always used Mrs. Nelson's coach, and I shall do so, till I find reason to do other.. wise." The defendant then said, " I wonder you like to go by those who don't pay 20s. in the pound ; the Nelsons have failed, and paid only 10s. in the pound." Mr. Benson ex pressed his disbelief of the fact, upon which the defendant re peated the assertion, adding, " I know it to be true, Mr I was told it by a commercial man of great respectability ; who uses my house, and he was a sufferer by them, and received only 10s. in the pound for his debt." It appeared, upon the cross examination of Mr. Benson, that he had heard a report of the plaintiff's insolvency, several months before the period in question, at different places, but he said he never believed what he had heard. The plaintiffs are largely concerned as coach_ proprietors, having extensive connexions in this and other counties, and had in their business at least 500 horses. Mrs. Nelson is . proprietor of the Bull-inn, in Aldgate, in which her son has no interest. It further appeared, that at• the time when the words were spoken the plaintiffs were starting new coaches, and were in apparently good credit and in prosperous circumstances. In the defence it was urged, that the defendant was not ha fluenced by malicious motives, and that no damage had been proved or suggested as accruing to the plaintiff from the words alleged ; and that, had the defendant given up his author at the time they were spoken, he would, in point of law, have had a complete answer to the action. It was obvious that the object of this action was to advertise the plaintiffs' concern as coach Proprietors, and not to seek a compensation in damages flit. any supposed injury to their credit. No witnesses were called for the defendant. Mr. Baron GRAHAM summed up the ease, and told the Jury that the plaintiffs were entitled to a' verdict, the words being clearly actionable ; and although there was no proof of 'positive damage, yet lie said it was natural to suppose that a report of o se:inns a nature was ca_lcula!ed, to afil , ct tile credit of persons PRICE SEVENPr,Ner:. in the plaintiffs' business, and therefore the Jury would' take the case into their serious consideration, tfad give such damages as the Merits seemed to justify. The Jury found their verdict for the plaintiffs—DanigA 3(l. t4ONV,N, fiIDE: • -- • .Tantes Mallet was indicted for stealing, at Stanford Rivers, on the 25th of March, a horse, the property of Edward Rayner. It appeared in evidence, that -in the night of the 25th of March. the prosecutor, a farmernf Ongar, had his stable: and cart-lodge broken open - and robbed of a h orse , a cart, an d f our sets of harness. .Qn'tfie 27th, Hall,' the officer of trnion Hall Police Office apprehended. the prisoner at some stables in tint borough of Southwark ; and on searching his person found a key which opened the stable in which was the horse in ques tion. The prisoner then directed the officer to another stable in the same neighbourhood, in which were found three other stolen horses, and a regular. ss.t of house breaking . implements. One of the witnesses, 'examined for the prosecution, proved that he was coming to aindon.eariy -on • the morning of the 26th Alareh, and was overtaken by the prisoner and another mail, riding in a tart. The prisoner offered to give him tr lift,,but he declined. He swore positiielY to the prisoner's identity. . - The prisoner declared his innocence; hut called no witnesses. The Jury, under the Learned Judge's directions, irnme diately.found- the prisoner Guilty. . • The Loup CurEr JusTicE then proceeded to pass the awful sentence of death upon this, and two other prisoners, named 'Walter Nunn and James ploy, who had been-ton- Vicied of a similar offence during the assizes. His Lordship told the unhappy culprits, that the crime of horse-ste:ding had now become so common i n every part of the kingdom, that it became absolutely necessary, for .the .protection of such pin perty, that the dreadful sentence Of the law should take its course. That lenity which bed induced the Crown to spare the Eves of persons convicted of this offence, when irwa+ not so frequent, had, lie feared, produced the enoamous in corfecaiszevtk'ililliscliitwwa:si s fi .t o o w so m stop the fountain n b ta e i he admonished these wretched convicts to prepare theniselves odneopflored. mercy, The and only thereforei moue for their transit into an o the r wor ld. I n one o f f their cases he believed there were circumstances which would justify him in recommending the culprit as an object of Royal mercy • but he earnestly entreated each to make the best use of the short time left him on this.side of the grave, in fitting • himself to appear in the presence of his Maker. In conclusion, he prononticed sentence in the usual form. The prisoners were all deeply of and were with diffi culty removed from the dock. The business on the Crown Side ended at one o'clock this day. EXTRAORDINAItY INVEsTIGATION. RESUMED INQUEST ON THE CHILD SENT BY vie SOUTHAMPTON COACH. Last night, at 8 o'clock, this investigntion -was resumed for the fourth time, by -Mr. H G GS, the C oroner , an d the usual number of Jurymen, at the house of Mr. Sambrook, the Regent-arms, in Regent-street, Vauxhall-road. It will be recollected, that on the last evening on which the inquiry was held, it was resolved that a second . suounOns sbOuld be forwarded to Mr. Lyford, the surgeon and acccuchenc,-r"quir ing his attendance in London to explain, if possible, the mystery the affair was• attended with; and, yesterday that Gentleman arrived, and was in attendance before the Jury. As the particulars of this extraordinary transaction haVe been before published, we will now only. give the following addi tional testimony touching the subject in question :—• Mr. Henry Lyford was then called in, and said, that he did not receive the first summons till two days after it was rettirii able, which was the reason he did not attend the last inquiry. He then stated, that about 2 or 3 months ago a Mrs. Sturgess, living in the churchyard at. Winchester, engaged him to attend her daughter Jane (who was pregnant) in - her confinement.— He, according to his engagement, attended her on Monday, /he 4th instant, and she was safely delivered of a child,—it was a large healthy infant, but .he.eonld not now state on oath the sex of it, although he noticed a t it th e t i me . Wh en the chid was born, he gave it to old Mr s . St urgess , an d s h e gave -i t to a girl named Sopp, who is about 19. The child was in excel lent health, and cried very much ; and on his giving the in fant to its grandmother, she said, - " I was in hope s it wo u ld have been born dead." About two hours after be was .called to Miss Sturgess, who, he was given to understand, was very ill; •he attended directly, and found nothing ailed her, and on going out of the room the old lady followed him, and. sa id the child was dead. A t his request he saw it, and on his ex pressing his surprise, she said it died soon after its birth; wit ness did not think the child had been washed. [The child sent in a basket had not been washed.) Ile suspects it was a' pal& child, but cannot say positively,. The Coroner here infOrined the Jury, that since the last in vestigaticn Mr. White; the Magistrate, had laid the affair be fore the Secretary of State, mho had written to Wincheater, de siring an immediate investigatiim there 'into the affair ' and in consequence he had received a packet from M r : N ew bold, the Magistrate, enclosing ' the depositions of several person a exa mined before him, which he would read, and they wo u ld th en act upon them as they thought proper. - The depositions sere then read : they went to prove that in several conversations the deponents had had with the mother of . Miss Sturgess, she de scribed her infant as a fine boy. The father of:the child, whose name is Hubert Brown, was also told that jane'S child was a boy. The CORONER remarked, that after all, they could not trace the child sent to London to the-wom a n Sturgess. Although the presumption might he strong against her, yet be cnnsidered that if they returned a verdict of murder against Jane Stur ges', she would never be convicted. Mr. Holt, the surgeon, said, that he was with Mr. White, the Magistrate, when he waited upon the Secretary of Statr, who expressed his opinion that he feared that they would never be able to trace out any thing here, whatever might be done at Winchester. The COROWER.said, that no proof could be obtained of any female child.having been illegally obtained. as a substitute for the one sent to London. This the Jury would weighlii their minds before thc.y found a verdict against the young lady:' uamt.—There arc two circumstances that act very strimgly against Jane Sturgess—which are, that she partly owned -the apron that the child was wrapped in ; and again, Mr. Lyford declares the child that he delivered her of was very large,' and the one owned by Jane Sturgess, and which had been eihn mated,was a small one. • Mr. Lyford said he saw the child that had been disinterred, and did not consider it to be very small; but whether it was..a4 large as the one he deliveredkthe woman of, he could not take upon himself to say. The CORONEIt said, that whatever the verdict of the. might be, the business would not be dropped,- as the Magi.- trztcy at Winchester had received orders from the Secretary of State to prosecute every inquiry possible. The Jury then del:berated, and after some consultation, •re. turned the fcllowing verdict Wilful Murder against some person or persons unknown."-- TULIP:TREE.-There is now growing on Der went Isle, Keswick, the property of Generol PEACH, a very large tulip-tree, on one brawl, of which are upwards of sixty tulips, of a beautiful rich yellow colour. The tulip-tree is very rarely known to bloom in this country. Muinnooms.—Mushrooms form such a dainty dish, that we may well be surprised that rio more attention is paid to them in our island.::, Zn Russia every child, every peasant, every indivi dual, is familiar with the.ectible and the poisonous species, because they 'are taught to collect them in their earliest days. They are-eitherldried, pickled, or salted, and are cooked in differer„it ways—stelved i roasted, and mixed with . sauc,e,:i. The quantity and vatiety •of Mushroomsi . aibict are offered early in the ' morning in ..414.'gre'lt market of Moscow, called.-600t0914tiady asto nish the stranger. - Jot only : , bitsitetsjull, cart loads are remarked, and they are often 146- cured at a very low price.