The Sun. — London, England, 1856-01-14 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY EVENING, JANUARY 14, 1856. symptoms described by me in the book which I have written upon poisons as attending the taking of anti mony relate to the taking of a vital dose. Mr. Smith—Am I to understand that there may be the administration of poison in some form or other with out atiy ofie of those symptoms ? JOr. Taylor—Sir, what I have described in my book relates to the administration of antimony in acute doses. This is no such case. This is a case of the administration of antimony in small doses. The antimony was given in this case in small doses—medicinal doses probably—but certainly small doses. Had it been administered in large di.ses, my belief is that it would have produced the symp toms which are described in that book. I have compared my observations here with what I have written in my book, and with the appearance of the body as described by those who made the post mortem examination, and my opinion is not affected. By a Juror—Antimony would not have been a proper medicine to administer in the state of weakness in which she was said to have been found. Cress examination continued—There was not sufficient arsenic in the system to account for death. Dr. Rees and myself examined some antimony, and, as is mostly the case in commercial antimony, we found arsenic there. In the deceased it did not exist in the heart. If anti mony should be taken during life, and the system be comes saturated by it, it would require 14 or 15 days to get rid of it. After 14 or 15 days, supposing a weak lady, for instance, had strength to live so long, I should net in life find traces of antimony taken before that period. Bat if antimony should exist in the system at the time of death we could discover it for any length of time after that event. The effects of poison upon the system do not depend upon the quantity taken into the stomach, but upon the quantity absorbed into the SyS tern. It is not 5 or 50 grains in the stomach that are de cisive, but the quantity which impregnates the blood ; so that a man may swallow 5 grains, and it may produce severer effects upon him than 50 upon another. That which we find in the stomach is only the sediment or dregs of what bas killed. From the medical evidence given as to the state of the deceased during the last eight days preceding her death, and from the discovery of antimony in the stomach, bowels, rectum, and all parts of her body, it is my opinion she died from the effects of tartar emetic, and no other cause, after antimony. George Owen Rees deposed—l am, Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, and Fellow of the Royal Society. and Professor of Materia Medics in Guy's Hospital. I assisted Dr. Taylor in making the analysis described by him, and also the state of the organs. I have heard the evidence given by him, and I fully concur in it. lam of the same opinion as to the cause of death. By Mr. Deane—From the evidence I have heard here I have no Ota3oll to alter my opinion given in the report read by Dr. Taylor. From the history of the illness of the deceased, given by those who attended her in her ill ness, and from the examination of the organs after death, and from the fact that antimony was discovered, as de scribed in our conjoint report, I am decidedly of opinion that deceased died from the effects of antimony adminis tered in small doses, repeated at intervals. Mr. Deane (to the Coroner)— Do you intend to com• plete the case of Anne Palmer before going on with that of Walter Palmer ? The Coroner—Oh yes ; I shall take a verdict from the jury upon the cause of the death of Anne Palmer before taking the evidence in the second case. Mr. Smith also desired that this course should be taken. Dr. Taylor, however, requested that his evidence in the second case might be taken before the hour at which it would be necessary for him to leave Rugeley to catch the express at Stafford, as both be and Dr. Rees were absent from London at great sacrifice to themselves. The Coroner consented to comply with his request. Mr. Smith (to Dr. Rees)—Have you found poison in the system of Walter Palmer ? Dr. Rees—We have not. Dr. Knight re-examined—My opinion . as to the cause of the death of Anne Palmer has been considerably mo dified and altered since I have heard the opinions of Drs. Taylor and Rees, and I am inclined to think that I must have been mistaken in the opinien which I gave yester day, under the circumstances stated to me on my visit to the deceased Mrs. Palmer ; and I tend to the belief that the opinion given by those gentlemen to-day de s et-flied the true cause of death. By the foreman—l di3 not perceive any symptoms of fever ; they were those of great exhaustion. By Mr. Smith—To the best of my belief the skin was heated and the tongue was moist. I agree with the opinion as to the different effects of antimony upon the 'system, when administered iu large or small doses. Dur ing my examination of the deceased, when I visited her in her illness, I did not suspect poison. Having heard the descriptions of Drs. Taylor and Rees as to the symp toms of poisoning from antimony, I still say that I did not on that visit perceive symptoms of poisoning so de scribed by them as resulting from the taking of antimony. Yet, having heard those opinions, I now believe that at that time the deceased was suffering from the effect of antimony. Mr. Palmer did not tell me what medicine, it any, he had prescribed before Dr. Bamford was called in ; at least I don't recollect that he did. After hearing the statements of Drs. Taylor and Rees, and the de,crip tion given yesterday by Dr. Monckton of the condition of the body after death, there is nothing inconsistent with Mrs. Palmer's having died from vomiting, from na tural causes, yet I don't believe that she did. The vomit ing might have been produced by a bilious attack, and exhaustion produced by that been followed by death. From the appearance of the viscera, as given by Dr. Monckton, my opinion is that vomiting was not the cause of death. I found Mrs. Palmer in so exhausted a state that I could not get from her a statement as to her feelings. I believe that it is impossible t r form an ac- I aerate opinion as to the nature of a disease, unless the patient suffering is able to describe his feelings. Sup pose a man was suffering from an acute disease of the brain, and he was rambling in his mind, and unable to give a description of his symptoms, I could not form a I correct. opinion of the existence of the organic disease, if army, under which he was labouring. By Mr. Deane—There was not fever in the deceased when I saw her, and tartar emetic was certainly not a proper medicine to administer to her. Here the Court adjourned—it being 1 o'clock—for half an hour. Upon the return of the Court after the adjournment the brat witness called was Benjamin Miller (he was examined by Mr. Deane) — Upon being sworn he said—l am a surgeon, living at Barton-under-Needwood. I knew the deceased Anne Palmer. I was formerly in practice at Rugeley. I ex amined Mrs. Palmer for the purposes of life assurance in January or February, 1854. I examined her four or tire times. These examinations were two for the Scottish Equitable-office, and two or three for other offices. The first two referred to one ass Nance. The Rock, the Atlas, and the Liverpool Life Assurance Associations were the other societies for which I examined Mrs. Palmer. lam not certain whether I examined her for the Norwich Union-office. I believe those examinations wsra shortly before her confinement. I found her to be of perfectly sound constitution. I considered hers to be a proper life for assurance. Ido not remember pre cisely when she was confined. I saw her afterwards. She was down stairs. I do not know whether she had been out. I saw her for the Scottish Equitable-offisar shortly alter her confinement. I saw her in consequence of a communication I received from the office. I was requested by Mr. W. Palmer to give a certificate of Mrs. Pa; arer'm health after her confinement, and after I had received the communication from the Scottish Equit able-office. Mr. Palmer gave me as a reason that I had seen her so recently on the part of other offices that he aid not think it requisite, and that she would be alarmed. He did not suggest any reason for alarm. Mr. Deane—Did she express any alarm at your wish ing to examine her again ? The witness did not reply to this question. Mr. Smith—Was what she said said in the presence of Mr. Palmer ? Witness—No. Mr. Smith—Then I object to the question. The an swer would not be evidence. . - By Mr. Smith—All women pregnant are considered, medically, to be in a state of disease. There is always danger attending confinements. I believe there are not many assurance offices which refuse to insure what are called diseased or appear to be diseased lives, as in this case. I was the medical referee of the society. [Mr. Smith read one of the certificates, in which the witness had made no entry, although he said he thought that he had, of the pregnancy of the deceased.] By Mr. Smith—The policy was accepted. I consider that. a person who would lose property on the death of his wife would not exercise more than reasonable caution by insuring her life before her confinement. I meant by a sound life that there was no organic disease. Mrs. Palmer had no organic disease. I was employed by the office to make the examination of Mrs. Palmer. The examinations were confined to the entire of January and a portion of February. Ido not kdow when Mrs. Pal mer was expected to be confined. Ido not know how many proposals were made. The examinations were made concurrently —some before and some after Mrs. Palmer's confinement. By Mr. Deane—l cannot say whether I examined Mrs. Palmer on the part of the Rock office before or after her confinement. Mr. Deane, in reply to Mr. Smith, said that Mrs. Palmer was confined on the 24th of January, 1854. By Mr. Smith—There were two examinations for the Scottish Equitable —one before and one after her con finement. The diary which the accused kept in January in that year was put in, from which was read : " Jan. 25.—Annie and baby going on well.] " Jan. 26.--Up with baby all night. " Jan. 27.—At home all day ; baby worse. Mr. Bamford called to see baby, and sent mixture. Baby died at 10 p.m." By Mr. Smith—l was requested by the Rock-office and by Mr. Palmer to examine Mrs. Palmer. Sometimes 3lr. Palmer applied to me before I heard from the office. Tile proposal to the Rock Assurance Society was then handed in, the handwriting on which was admitted by Mr. Smith to be that of the accused. All the proposals were afterwards given to the coroner, and read by him. The following are the particulars of those documents : The Scottish Equitable-office accepted, on the 2d of February, 1854, a proposal upon the deceased's life for 5 , 0 001., made by her husband. The New Equitable 3,0001., accepted on the Bth of December, 1853, on the proposal of th e accuse d upon t h e lif e of h i s d ecease d wife. A proposal to the Scottish Amicable for 3,0001., made by the same upon the life of the same, declined on January 3, 1854. The amount named in the case was, by mistake, 3001. only, and it was declined till after the confinement of Mrs. Palmer. It was afterwards al cepted, and again rejected by this office upon the dis c/very of the mistake. Two other proposals were made and accepted, dated January the 17th and 19th in the above year. Mr. Smith— I was desirous that hose acceptances stioubl be read, in order that it might be seen that they were made before the confinement of the deceased. By Mr. Smith—l never heard of a reported case or knew a case of slow poison from antimony. Previously to this I never heard of one in any part of the world. By the Coroner—Having heard all the evidence, and receiving the request of the jury that I would state my opinion, I say that I should think that death was occa sioned by small doses of antimony. By Mr. Smith—T mean by a " small dose," a medi cinal one. The dose of medicine, however, which would be good to one might kill another. Thomas Lomax, examined by Mr. Deane—l am a sur geon, living at Stafford. Early in the year 1854 I exa mined Mrs. Palmer on account of the Medical General Legal Life-office, the New Equitable Life-office, and the Kent Mutual. There was a fourth, but lam not quite distinct upon that. That (a report handed to him) was one of my reports. The Coroner—Do you wish that to be evidence ? Mr. 'Deane—Shortly ; the date of it. Examination continued—The date is the 12th January, 1354. It is the proposal to the New Equitable for the sum of 3001. I reported favourably of the life. After wards I had a correspondence with the office upon the subject. Mr. Deane —Will you state shortly the result of that correspondence ? The Coroner—Oh, you must produce it. Witness, after a pause, on examining his papers, said that he had not the letters with him. They were afterwards found by Mr. Deane, when Mr. Smith objected to them as evidence. Mr. Deane—Then I will make it evidence for you. Witness—This proposal is one made by Mr. Palmer. There was a mistake in the matter of the proposal in this paper of 3001. for 3,0001. [Several proposal papers were banded in to the coro ner. who read them to the jury. One was dated the 12th of January, 1854, for 3001., to the New Equitable ; another was dated January 25, 1854, for 5,0001., in the same office, the latter being a correction of the previous proposal. At the bottom of this last proposal the ac cused stated that this proposal was made to secure a similar sum on some doubtful property in Stafford.] Witness continued—ln each case in which I examined Mrs. Palmer I considered that Mrs. Palmer wasa healthy subject. By Mr. Smith—ln one proposal it is stated that the deceased, on the occasion of the death, of the third child, had hail a prolonged labour, when the infant died, from the umbilical cord being twice round the neck. Such an entry would tend to check the ready acceptance of the proposal by the assurance society. By Mr. Deane—Such au accident as that described would be dangerous to the child, but not, I think, to the mother. Henry M. Wakley—l am at present the managing director of the New Equitable Life-office. I received this proposal from Mr. Lomax. (It was the first that was put in for 3001.) That proposal was accepted. It was re ceived on the 13th of January, 1854, and it would be accepted on the 19th of January in the same year. After that proposal was accepted, and before the issuing of a policy, I received a second proposal, in consequence of a letter from Mr. Lo max , stat i ng there h a d b een a mis take. That second proposal was received on the 26th, and accepted on the same day, that being a board day. It was, however, in a few days afterwards declined. Mr. Deane—l h ave no thi ng f urther to ask t hi s witness. By Mr. Smith —Not in all cases the statement of a prolonged labour would induce an office either to refuse to grant a policy, or charge an increased premium. Still we might charge an extra premium. We might pursue this latter course i t , t h e case o f a repetit i on o f suchill ness. In the case of a protracted labour, and in one in which a proposal is made immediately before another confinement we should not have accepted the proposal until after the confinement. If there was a second long labour, it would make us hesitate before we accepted. Mr. Deane—Having accepted, and afterwards rejected that proposal, will you say whether it was ultimately re jected because of a prolonged confinement ? Mr. Smith—T object to the question. Tile Coroner--If he makes a statement he may give the reason of it. Mr. Smith still objected. Mr. Deane--I sba !be perfectly satisfied if the coroner will make a note of th at question. The Coroner—Th e jury wish to have the question answered. Witness—Tt was not rejected because of a prolonged labour. The Coroner—The jury also wish to know why it was rejected ?. Mr. Smith—Oh, Mr. Coroner, you ought to exercise your authority, and prevent such questions. The Foreman —Why was it refused ? Witness—Because of information which we received from the manager of another assurance office to whom a proposal had been made. John Goddard—l ant actuary to the Rock Assurance Society. I produce a proposal by Wm. Palmer, surgeon, of Pugeley, upon the life of his wife, Anne Palmer, for 5,0001. for six years ; dated Jan. 26, 1854, on the life of Anne Palmer, aged 27, signed by Win. and Anne Pal mer, and witnessed by Ann Bradshaw. Palmer, in this proposal, stated that he had an interest in the life of his wife to the amount to which he desired the office to se cure to him. Before granting that proposal the directors wished to know the interest Palmer had in the life of his wife ; the amount he was going to insure in other offices; the amount and object of the loan, which it was stated by Mr. Strawbridge (the agent of our office) Mr. Pal mer was about to borrow on the assurance. Mr. Smith objected to anything being said by the wit ness which he had learnt from Mr. Strawbridge. By the Coro!' er—Theproposal was ultimately declined. Ey Mr. Smith—Almost all I havestated I have learnt from Mr. Strawbridge. Witness—There are two other cases that I might men tion. Coroner—Have they reference to your office ? Witness—No. Coroner—l suppose that the assurance offices have an objection to state the reason why they refuse lives ? Mr. Deane—They have not the slightest objection in this ewe. Coroner—Because some offices have rejected my life. Thomas M. Strawbridge, examined by Mr. Deane, at the request of the Coroner—l am the manager of the Rugeley Provincial Bank, and the agent of the Scottish Equitable-office. I produce one proposal. It was signed William and Anne Palmer. The proposal was accepted for 5,0001., and the money was received in March, 1855. The proposal was made on the 13th of January, 1854. In addition to the above proposal I received one for the Rock-office, from which I received a letter ; in conse quence of which letter I communicated with Mr. Pal mer, and then wrote to the Rock-office the letter which I produce. I applied to him for certain particulars, which he refused to give me, and then I wrote that let ter, making the statements which are in that letter. The Coroner expressed some objection to receiving the letter as evidence, when Mr. Deane said—lf you don't think that that letter ouht to be put in I will not press it. The Coroner--I don't think it is necessary. Alfred Bishop Butterfield deposed—l am clerk to the Sun Life Assurance Society, London. This is a proposal made to the office by William Palmer, surgeon, of Rug, ley, dated the 11th of Feb., 1864, to insure the life of his wife for 5,0001. The certificate of health is signed by Anne Palmer, and the decl ara ti on was s i gne d by Wil liam Palmer upon the granting of the policy. The po licy is 12,738. The receipt is dated the fith of February, 1855, signed " William Palmer." Money paid to Wm. Pratt, solicitor, 5, Queen-street, Mayfair, London, in pursnance of a written order. - John iillward Campbell Koch deposed---I am secre taly to the Scottish Amicable Life Assurance Society. A proposal was made to our office on the life of Anne Palmer by William Palmer, her husband, and it was dated the 3d of Jan., 1554. it was for the SUM of 3,0001., out was declined. Mr. Bergen, superintendent of police, examined yes terday, was recalled—l saw Dr. Monckton take a bottle similar to this from William Palmer's surgery.. Mr. Smith—Oh, I'll admit all that. I will admit that Dr. Monckton took that and a hundred other bottles if you like, all containing poison, from Mr. Palmer's surgery. 1)r. Morickton—l received this bottle from the bands of Mr. Bergen, in Mr. Palmer's house, on, I think, the 17th of Dec., the day on which Palmer was removed from egeley. I believe that it contains tartarised antimony. I received no other bottles besides that one. There were many other bottles. The surgery was complete with bottles that one would expect to find infsuch a room. I have satisfied myself, by tasting it, that the contents of that bottle contain tartarised antimony, which is more generally known to the public under the name of tartar emetic. By Mr. Smith—The bottles were generally such as one would find in a surgery, except that they-were not so full as is commonly the case. Mr. Doane--I have no other witness to call with re ference to the death of Anne Palmer. Mr. Smith—l wish to ask Dr. Taylor whether this is not the first case en record of a case of slow poison by antimony ? The Croroner—ls there any more evidence in the case of Anne Pa!lner ? lle r :t i o t Smith—Mr, Coroner, I should like to say a few words. 'rho Coroner reminded Mr. Smith that Drs. Taylor and Rees were waiting to go to London. Mr. Smith—Oh, then, certainly I should much prefer that. Mr. Deane—But there are other witnesses that shoulal be heard. The Coroner—What witnesses, Dr. TAylor, do you wish to have called? Dr. Taylor—Why, I should like to hear the evidence of those persons who were present with Walter Palmer shortly before his death. Mr. Smith—Then that case I think we had better go to the jury at one 6as to the cause of the death of Anne Palmer. This course was then determined upon, when, After considerable discussion as to the right of Mr, Smith to address the jury, which ended in that body de clining to hear that gentleman, The Coroner, in order to put his notes together to read them to the jury, adjourned the Court fur a quarter of an hour. Upon the reassembling of the Court, The Coroner said that he should not read that portion of the evidence which did not immediately relate to the question into which the jury had to inquire. Their object was the inquiry into the death of the deceased Anne Palmer. In coming to that conclusion, he must remark that any statements which had been made in the public prints respecting this matter should not be allowed to influence their minds. Such state ments might, with men of less intelligence than the jury he was now addressing, have had some weight, but he did not think that they would have weight with them. He must also remark that, although there were other roses pending, they had to consider only this one, antil should dismiss from their minds any knowledge that they might have re Tectif:g others. They had sworn t o come to a conclusion in accordance with the evidence in this case, and this only. The principal points they would have to consider were, first, the cause of death ; secondly, if the cause of death was poison ; thirdly, they must consider by whom that poison was administered, if at all administered—whether it was taken accidentally, or whether it was given deliberately. And then, having sa tisfied themselves•upon this point, it would be for theta t.) say under what circhmstances it was so administered. The Coroner then read through those parts of the evi dence which be thought important, briefly remarking upon portions of it. At the conclusion of his remarks, at. about 10 minutes past 6 o'clock, the jury retired to consider their verdict. Upon the rtturn of the jury, after au absence of 20 milauteg, The Coroner said—Gentlemen, have you considered your verdict? The Foreman.—Yes. The Coroner.—What is your verdict The Foreman then, amid breathless silence of a crowded and excited court, said— We find that Anne Palmer died from the effects of tartarised antimony, and that that was designedly administered by her husband, William Palmer. The announcement of the verdict was followed by de cided manifestations of satisfaction from a large nurubsr of persons in the hall. The Coroner, after a pause.—What do you mean by its being "designedly" administered ? The Foreman._\Ve mean that it was designedly ad ministered for the purpose of destroying life. The Coroner—That, gentlemen, is a verdict of wilful murder ? The Foreman—That is our verdict. The Coroner—Then, in that case the evidence must be written upon parchment. That shall be done, and the evidence in that form laid before you on Monday morning, to which time I adjourn this Court, to inquire into the cause of the death of Walter Palmer. The court was then cleared. During the progress of the case, and after Dr. Taylor bad completed his evidence, Mr. Smith, addressing the coroner, remarked that he understood that Dr. Taylor's report of the analyses upon the remains of the deceased, which had been submitted to bile, appeared in the Times of that morning. He should like to know by whom it bad been communicated to the Times? I want to know, said Mr. Smith, by whose consent it was published'? Dr. Taylor—Not by mine, certainly. Mr. Smith—lf reports of this description are to get abroad before they are properly giver4in evidence, there is an end of all justice and all inquiry. Such a proceeding is very likely to prejudice the case against Mr. William Palmer. Dr. Taylor.—The publication of it was very impro per. One of the reporters asked me whether I had ob jection to his t eking a copy before I delivered it, because the hour was getting late ; and he would have to leave train for London without being able to transcribe it in time for publication in the paper which he represented on the following morning, if I refused to permit a copy to be taken before I delvered it. I replied that I could permit a copy to be taken on no condition except the one that it should not be published before I had given it in evidence. Upon a pronotise to that effect being given to me, I granted the request of the reporter. Mr. Smith wished the coroner to require from the correspondent of the Times how he became possessed of the report. The Coroner.—l cannot call the reporter of the Times as a witness. Call on the next witness. The reporter adds that, whatever promise might have been required from the gentlemen to whom Dr. Taylor referred, and given by them, the two gentlemen engaged in the inquiry by whose courtesy he was enabled to ob tain A copy of the learned Professor's report imposed no such conditions upon him ; and that be consequently made no promise respecting it. He further states that, until he heard the statement of Dr. Taylor to that effect ,n Satur !ay, he did net know that the reporters alluded to had obtained the report under any conditions. The legal gentlemen who have been retained to con duct the case for the prosecution of Palmer are the At torney-General, Mr. Whiteley, Q.O , and Mr. Huddle ston. The counsel for the defence have not yet been ►elected. The solicitors who have hitherto bad the management of the case on behalf of the accused have three names before them, from which they w►ll make a selection. Those named are Sir Frederic Thesiger, Ser. jeant Wilkins, and Mr. Elwin James, of the Home Circuit. From the commencement of the inquiry on Friday morning to its close on Saturday night, the proceedings were watched by Captain Hatton, the chief of the Staf fordshire police. STAFFORD, SUNDAY NIGHT. It is said that evidence has been obtained of William Palmer having purchased prussic acid at Wolverhamp ton, on the day before his brother, Walter Palmer, died. There have been further disclosures mile respecting the death of Bladen, formerly collector for Messrs. Char riuvton, the brewers, of Mile End. THE PROJECTED ROAD ACROSS ST. JAMES'S- PARK. It will be in the recollection of the readers of this journal that in the autumn of last year it became known to the public that a project was in contemplation by the Government for carrying a public road across the mid dle of St. James's-park, from the B:rdcage-walk on the south side to Pall-mall on the north, and that a consi derable amount of popular indignation followed the an nouncement of the proposition. From that time little or nothing has been heard of the matter, no steps have actually been taken for carrying the scheme into execu tion, and it was supposed that Sir Benjamin Hall, the Minister of Public Works, who has hitherto had all the credit of the proposal, had accepted the significant hint of the public disapprobation, and consigned it to the limbo of abortive and abandoned projects. But it will be seen, from what transpired at an interview on Wed nesday last between the hon. baronet, and a deputation of gentlemen who waited upon him on the subject, that he sought to divest himself of the conception and responsibility of the scheme in question, with which the inhabitants of the metropolis had begun to connect hie tenure of office, and that it cannot be said to be relin quished. The precise 'node in which the project is to be car ried out has never been divulged by theauthorities charged with its contrivance. But there are good grounds for be lieving that it is to be a public carriage road, commenc ing in Birdcage-walk, at the present entrance to the park from Queen-square, and carried over the ornamental walks and water of the enclosure by a viaduct resting on a series of arches to a landing place in the Mall on the opposite side, and so opening up a direct communication between Westminster and Pall-Mall, which it will enter between Marlborough House and St. James's Palace. The deputation to which reference has been made, con sisting of several gentlemen of great respectability, re siding in the immediate vicinity of the park—namely, Mr. Keating, M.P., Q C. ; Mr. Benjamin Hawes, of the department of the Secretary for War : Mr. Whately, Q.C. ; Mr. Tomlinson, barrister ; Mr. Lavie, an emi nent solicitor, and Mr. Tustin, had an interview, by ap pointment, on the subject of the proposed road, with Sir 13. Hall, on Wednesday last, at his official residence in Whitehall-place. Tne deputation would have been more numerous, but several gentlemen who had expressed a wish to take part in it were unavoidably out of town. Mr. KEATING, M.P., addressing Sir Benjamin Hall, said that the gentlemen accompanying him and himself, all of whom resided in the immediate neighbourhood of the park, had waited upon him with the view of ascer taming what the intentions of the Government were with reference to the road in question. They and many others of the inhabitants felt considerable uneasiness in respect of the proposed alteration, which they thought wits calculated materially to impair the enjoyment of the park by the general public, without affording them any countervailing advantage. Sir B. HALL said he would avail himself of that oppor tunity to state, while explaining bow the matter in ques tion stood, that much apprehension had prevailed in the public mind as to his position in respect to it. The publics had an erroneous idoa that he was the author of the pro posed plan, and that he could do what he liked in the parks. But that was not so. He was not a member of the Cabinet ; he could only act in accordance with the instructions he received from the Secretary of State for the Rome Department ; and wit . : but an executive officer to direct any public works coming within the scope of his department to he carried into execution which might be determined upon by the Government, with the sanc tion of Parliament. All he had done in the matter in question was this. Some short time since he, as Chief Commissioner of Works, had'reoeived instructions from the Secretary of State for the Home Department to pre pare a plan for making a road across the park upon certain data. That plan had been prepared, and it would be his duty to submit to the consideration of the Secretary of State, before the meeting of Parliament, when it would be laid on the table of the House of Commons. Nothing whatever had yet been done in the matter except preparing the plan; certainly nothing towards tee execution of the work. Mr. B. HAWES said he apprehended the cost of the proposed work would have to be included in the public estimates, and asked if it had been so included, as, with• out knowing the real state of the case, they (the depu tation) might be referred forward to a time when it might be too late for the public to make any available objection to the project ? Sir It HALL wan understood to say that the cost was not yet included in the estimates, that the plan had only been prepared, an d th a t h e h a d no power to do anything further in the matter. Mr. linwEs eaid he apprehended then they might consider that the subject was as yet only sub judice. Sir B. HALL said that was so ; and Mr. Keating, or any other member of Parliament, might ask for infor mation on the subject at the proper time in his place in the House of Commons. Mr. WIIATELEY suggested that it would be desirable that the deputation should go at once to Sir George Grey, the Home Secretary, and state their objections to the proposal before it proceeded further. He, for himself, had .not merely an objection to the road as a public grienance to the neighbourhood, but a personal dislike to it an depriving himself and others of the pleasure and advantmge they enjoyed from the enclosure as it at pre sent existed. It would not only affect the view from his house, which looked out upon the park, but by going . past Queen square would be an annoyance to the inha bitants in that quarter. A general conversation ensued, in which Mr. TOMLIN sioN, Mr. LIME, and other members of the deputation took part, and in which it was pressed upon Sir Ben jet fin Hall that the projected alteration would be preju dicial to the ccmfort of families in the vicinity, who were aemestomed to walk in the enclosure and to send their children there for health and recreation, while it would materially interfere with the enjoyments of a large body of tile classes who were im the }!abit of cmntinual!y re,:ortmg to the park for similar purpoe , .'ov a- I contended that there was no pressing necessity for the change. _ _ Sir B. HALL said all he could state was, that he could decide on nothing. There were three parks, St. James's, Hyde-park, and the Green-park, which were the property of her Majesty, and under the authority of the rangers, and in which he could not build a lodge, or make or divert a fo , ,tpatb, without authoritative instrivti , ,os. It was utherwiie iii the case of the Victoria, Battersea, and the Regent's Parks, which he might call the people's parks. Mr. KEATING said they might conclude, then, that the matter, as suggested by Mr. Hawes, was as yet sub judice. Me had come prepared to explain the grounds on which he thought the project in question was objec tionable, but he felt it was unnecessary after what bad been said by Sir B. Hall. Sir B. HALL said all he could say again was that he was pot at liberty to exercise any judgment in the mat ter, that he had prepared the plan which he had been instructed to prepare, and which he would send to the Secretary of State. The deputation might go, if they pleased, to Sir George Grey and state their objections to him, or, as he had already said, Mr. Keating alight ask for information on the subject in his place in Parlia ment. But, in the meantime, they might rely that no thing would be done in the execution of the work with out the matter being brought under the consideration o the House of Commons. At the request of Mr. Heating, Sir Benjamin under took to mention the circumstance to Sir George Grey of the deputation having waited upon him (Sir B. Hall) to express their objections to the proposed alteration, and the interview terminated. PRICEN OF SHARES IN BANKS, ASSURANCE, AND OTHER COM- PANIES' STOCK. From the Official List. PUBLISTIF.D . EVERY TUESDAY AND FRIDAY EVENING. LONDON, FRIDAY, JAN. 11, 1856. GAS-LIGHT AND COKE COMPANIES. . - t ii. . 11ADDINGTON CORN MARKET—JAL 11. WHEAT. BARLEY OATS. BEAN-. First 9ls Od 433 6d 33s 6d 52s O 7,i SQ. " Second 77s 7d 39s 3d 30s Od 45. 101 Third 663 Od I 31s Od 21s Od 143. O&i Total quantity of wheat in market, 735 qrs., 6'19 old PP barley if 7,9 qrs., 721 , oats ~ 611. qrs., 593 Wald fl PP beans 61 qrs., 56 sold AVERAGES PER IMPEitiAL QUARTER. _ Wheat, 31. 17 7 6-1 the Barley, —ll. 19 3 8-12 tbs Oats, ... 11. 10 0 9-12ths 1 Beans, .....21. 5 10 6.l2tbs DALKEITH GRAIN MARKET—JAN. 10. Qrs. Best. Current. Infei 14, . 314 Wheat 83s Od 1379 Oats 3os 8,1 oos Od 965 Barley 42s 6d oos Od 50 Peas & beans 52s Od OOs Od THE IiDGELEY POISONING CASES. 1 Deane for the assurance companies ; Mr. Smith for the defence, assisted, in the examination of Dr. Taylor, by Dr. Bemberton, physician, of Birmingham. Mr. Ke• VERDICT OF WILFUL MURDER. nealy, of the Oxford Circuit, was present to•day, as yes- RiTGELEY, JAN'. 12. terday also. , After the departure of the express to London from Alfred Swaine Taylor deposed—l am a Fellow of the Stafford last night, Mr. Thurlby, Palmer's assistant, and Royal College of Physicians, Fellow of the Royal Society, Dr. Monckton were examined. Before, however, trap- and Professor of Chemistry at Guy's Hospital. On scribing their evidence, it would be well that the state- i Monday, the 24th of last month, I received six jars from relent of Dr. Knight should be given at that length which the last witness. Three of them were labelled " Ann its importance merits. Palmer, No. 1,2, and 3" outside. They were well se- Dr. Edward Knight, examined, said—l am a physician cured and sealed, and the seal was unbroken. I locked residing at Stafford. I knew the deceased, Anne Palmer, them up until the 26th, keeping the key in my possession, from her infancy. I was called to see her professionaliy and then, in conjunction with Dr. Rees, I proceeded to on the 25th of Sept., 1854. When I arrived I found Mr. examine them. We first examined the stomach in jar No. Palmer waiting for me, when he told me I had been sent I . The coats were firm and very well preserved, consider for at Mrs. Palmer's particular request. After hearing ins that 15,months had elapsed since death. On the sto the description of her disease from Mr. Palmer I went mach at its greater end, and on the outside, there was a upstairs and saw his wife. I endeavoured to examine the yellowish coloured streak which, when examined with a case, as well as I could, from Mrs. Palmer's own deserin- magnifying glass presented the appearance of mineral tion. I found her so much exhaust e d th a t I cou ld not matter. IF was such an appearance as I have never from her understand the nature of the disease. I think seen in 25 years' experience, except when mineral Mr. Palmer then, in her presence, described her complaint. i poison was in the stomach. We opened the stomach. Ile said that she bad had distressinr , vomiting, griping, We found neither liquid nor solid contents, but a thin and purging, and that she had caught cholera at Liver- pasty looking substance of a brownish colour spread pool, where at that time it was a prevailing disease. over the lining membrane. The whole quantity of this She did not vomit in my presence ; but the retching was substance spread over the membrane of the stomach distressing. I inquired for the evacuated matters, and amounted to about half a teaspoonful. The lining mein was told they had been thrown away. As far as I could brane presented slight patches of redness. Its surface form a judgment on the case, I thought it a severe form was examined b a magniing glass. It, was quite free of English or summer cholera. I then returned with Mr. f rom ulceration, jserforation, or any organic disease. The Palmer to a room below stairs, and recommended to 'email intestines were next examined. They were empty; him that she should take two minims of prussic acid for but covered on the inside in parts with a thin brownish the purpose of allaying the retching, which was then the coloured substance. The large intestines were then exit most distressing symptom. He told me that it should be mined. There was faecal matter in the ccuin, one portion administered immediately. I then walked into the town, of the large intestines. The inner surface of the re c tu m , called on Mr. Bamford and another friend, and design- or l ower bowel, was covered with a deep red orange edly remained two hours in the town, for the purpose coloured substance. On removing this and examining of ascertaining the effect of the prescription. In two the inner surface of the lower bowels, there was no tip hours time I called again, and saw her with Mr. Pal- pearance of ulceration or disease. The intestines mer, and she appeared then to be somewhat relieved. I were comparatively thin and well preserved, like the then took leave, with an assurance from Mr. Palmer stomach. One of the kidneys, which was enclosed in that if she did not continue to improve he would inemc- this jar was cut and minutely examined, and found diately send for me again. I returned to Stafford that to be perfectly healthy. We then examined the jar evening by train, and never heard any more of her case marked No. 3, containing the liver, the heart, the un til I was told on the Saturday following that she had lung, and the spleen. They had undergone some changes died on the Friday. from putrefaction, bat were in a healthy condition. By Mr. Deane—l had known Mrs. Palmer from her Th e gall bladder was especially examined. It contained infancy, and was one of her guardians. She was the about the usual quantity of bile found in the dead. That daughter of Lieet.-Colonel Brookes. Mr. Dawson was bile was thickened, from the result of long interment, to her acting guardian, and I only acted nominally. I bad the consistency of a brown paste. The heart was minutely on one or two occasions' atttended her before her mar- examined, and the cavities were healthy. All the valves riage, but am not aware that she had any disease. In were free from putrefaction, pure, and healthy. The lungs 1854—but I cannot tell what month, it was in the sum- and spleen were softened, as the result of putrefaction, mer time--I examined her to a sc er t a i n if h er life was in- but perfectly free from disease, as far as we could tell. surable, and I could not discover any disease. When We then proceeded to make an analysis of the different called in to see Mrs. Palmer professionally, she was not p ar t s . The first that we took for examination was the in a fit state to converse with me. After she had taken brown pasty matter found on the surface of the stomach. the two minims of prussic acid her voice was improved, In these contents, amounting to about half a teaspoonful, but she could not hold a conversation with me. She did we found rather a large portion of preparation of anti not herself express a wish to see me again, but her hus- mony. (The Doctor here displayed it.) We also found band promised, in her presence, tosend forme. I can't re- a minute proportion of arsenic. But arsenic was not collect whether I wrote a prescription or not, but I return- found deposited in any of the viscera. And, as an occa mended saline effervescing draughts. lam sure I did not sional impurity in ordinary tartar emetic, we consider suggest any preparation of antimony in the medicines I that arsenic in this case was owing to the tartar emetic prescribed. I never thought of it. I should not, under being impure, and not on account of its having been any circumstances, have prescribed tartar emetic, or any separately administered. We then searched fur other preparation of antimony—that could not have been pro- poisons but found none. The second analysis was directed per. When I came to the opinion that she died of sum- to the coats of the stomach, and they yielded antimony. mer cholera, I formed that opinion from statements Thirdly, the large and small intestines were examined, made by Mr. Palmer, as she was unable to describe her and found to contain antimony in all parts. Fourthly, Symptoms._ „.... . the orange red found i n th e rec t um was remove d an d _ ... . _ • , . . By Mr. Smith—Mr. Palmer appeared to evince a very proper feeling for his wife. Some I)ortion of Mrs. Palmer's symptoms favoured the statement made by Mr. Palmer. She was in an extreme state of exhaustion, and I should ant have been surprised at hearing of her death the next morning. I have never seen any one poisoned with antimony. I have seen large doses of antimony given, and I have observed extreme depression arising from it. I have administered large doses my self, and have witnessed alarming symptoms. I believe antimony will also produce purging. Mr. Smith having read an abstract from Dr. Taylor's philosophical work, which describes the effects produced by poisoning from antimony, Dr. Knight stated, in reply to a question from Mr. Smith, that Mrs. Bradshaw, the nurse, did not describe the symptoms which would be produced from poisoning by antimony; but her evidence went to negative the supposition that antimony was ad ministered. In reply to Mr. Deane, Dr. Knight observed—l should attach very little importance to Mrs. Bradshaw's evidence, medically considered. In reply to the Coroner, Dr. Knight stated that from the assertions of Mr. Palmer and Mr. Bamford, and what he saw, he had given a certificate as to the cause of her death to her husband. The certificate was produced by Mr. Deane, who had obtained it from the Sun Insurance-office. Mr. Benjamin Thurlby, assistant to Mr. W. Palmer, the accused, was next examined. Witness deposed that he saw Mrs. Palmer on the day before she died, and re mained with her about five minutes. She was then very feeble and exhausted, and it was with difficulty he could get her to answer any question. She said she felt as if she was sinking through the bed. Those were the only words witness heard her speak. Suggested that she should take arrowroot and brandy, and the nurse said she gave it her. Made up a prescription of Dr. Knight's a few days before she died. Saw the prescription on calling on Thursday or Wednesday, lying in the window in the kitchen, and Mr. Palmer asked witness to make it up. It was about Bor 9 o'clock in the evening. Was reading the prescription when Mr. Palmer came in. Did not recollect that Mr. Palmer gave any explanation as to why it was not made up before. Witness made it up. It was an alkaline mixture and powders to be taken in a state of effervescence. After making it uo, took it down to Mr. Palmer's. Thought it was on Tuesday night. It did not contain tartar emetic, or any pre paration of antimony.. By a Juryman—Mrs. Bradshaw was in the roern when I saw Mrs. Palmer. I believe it was her I told to get the arrowroot and brandy. By Mr. Smith—Mr. Palmer was a very kind man, and very kind to Mrs. Palmer. I was with him four or five years. I always considered him a very kind hus band. By the Coroner—l think that all the medicine except this was mixed up by Mr. Palmer or Mr. Bamford. I did not mix up any other. I have seen Mr. Palmer often mix up drugs himself. By Mr. Smith—l saw Mr. Palmer immediately after his wife's death, and he appeared to fret very much. Mr. Deane then proposed to put in Mr. Palmer's diary for 1854, and to read from the 18th of September to the Bth of October. From this we give a few extracts : "Sept. 19.—Went to Sandell. Saw Joseph. Jerry dined at the yard. Eliza returned hcnie." (Opposite this and some similar entries there was an asterisk.) "Sept. Qo.—Went to Lichfield. Jerry, Anne, and Sarah returned from Liverpool." " Sept. 21.—Anne ill in bed," &c. This entry was repeated for the three following days ; and on the 24th it is added—" Mr. 'Bamford called." " Sept. 25.—Bainford and Mr. Knight called. - Henry fetched Mrs. Bradshaw. Neither called to see Anne." On the 26th of September the entry is—" Anne very 11. Beinford called." "Sept. 28. Eliza very poorly in bed. caned." " Se'pt. 29, Friday— about 20 minutes past 1." Then follow a series of entries, consisting chiefly of the statement " At home." "Out. 3—Buried poor Anne." " Oat. B—At church, sacrament." David Henry Monckton,. M.D., residing at Itugeley, deposed—l made a post moment examination of the body of the deceased on Saturday, the 22d of Dec. last. There was externally no evidence of any injury, so far as the state of preservation of the body allowed me to form an opinion. There was a sufficient quantity of fat deposited in different parts of the body to prove that the deceased had not suffered long from any lingering illness. De composition had proceeded to some extent both exter nally and internally, and had so disorganised the brain as te make it impossible to decide as to its condition at the time of death. The rest of the body was in a state of preservation sufficient to allow me to speak positively as to the condition of the several parts. Some of these parts or organs were enclosed, unopened, in jars, and therefore unexamined by me. With regard to all the rest, the most careful examination failed to detect any alteration in the structure sufficient, in my opinion, to account for death. Although there was hut little blood in the body generally, there was in the chest a consider able quantity of bloody fluid which, in my opinion, Was the result of decomposition. The heart was quite empty and collapsed. The deceased was not consumptive or pregnant. The alimentary canal was especially examined, and showed nothing unhealthy. There was no errosion, corrosion, ulceration, perforation, or obstruction. It was, moreover, by no means empty. The stomach con tained but little, but the intestines were. moderately well filled with the material ordinarily found in the several parts, and the lower bowel had a considerable quantity of excrement in it, not hard and solid, but soft and semi fluid, and enntained the natural amount of bile ad mixed. From the; I conclude that she did not suffer in her last illness from an excessive or prolonged diarrhoea, nor could she have died f rom an o b s t ruc ti on in t h e b owels. I placed in one jar the stomach and the duodenum, in another parts of the large intestine and of the small in testine one kidney, and o ne o f the ovaries, which was forwarded from its not having exactly the usual appear ance, althoggh there was nothing that, in my opinion, could account for death. The third jar contained the lung. the heart, and the ri g ht liver, the spleen,The wit ness then described the mode in which the jars were secured. Another parcel contained parts of the lining of the Abell and of the dress of the body, which had been saturated with the discharges from the Corpse. They were placed in the hands of Police-Inspector C r i sp, on he evening of Saturday, December 22. Mr. Smith asked what the jars were made of? Witness—They were glazed earthenware jars. There was nothing in the appearance of the body which proved that Mrs. calmer might not have died of exhaustion as stated by the other medical men. My opinion is that the appearances were not consistent with her havingdied of English cholera, because English cholera going to the extent of causing death by exhaustion would have much more freely evacuated the alimentary canal. She might have died from extreme vornitines, producing exhaustion and causing death, but it would not be English cholera. the post modem, appearances are consistent with that. It being now nearly 7 o'clock, the inquiry was ad journed until 10 o'clock this morning, when it was un derstood that the evidence of Dr. Taylor, Dr. Rees, and parties connected with the assurance offices would be ken. o n the assemblipg of the Court this morning, much greater public interest appeared to he felt in the pro ceedings than was the case at the opening of the ad journed inquest yesterday. As was the case yesterday, Mr. Gardner appeared to etch the proceedings on behalf of the Crown ; Mr. separately examined ; antimony was found in this sub stance in larger proportions than in the stomach or any other parts.of the system. "This," said the Doctor, "is the antimony extracted." The orange red colour of this material was found to be owing to a portion of antimony which had become converted to sulphuret, as the result of pittrefaction in a dead body. The coats of the rectum were separately examined and also yielded antimony. The chyle was separately examined and also yielded an timony in large proportions, nearly as large as that found in the rectum. The liver, the spleen, the kidney, the substance of the heart, and the substance of the lungs, all yielded antimony. Here is antimony from all these (produced specimens). The blood drained from the jars in which these viecera were contained was also analysed, and this yielded antimony. A portion of the lining of the shell and a part of the shroud were separately exa mined, but they yielded no trace of antimony or any mineral substance. All the tests and vessels used in this investigation were themselves tested and found to be per fectly pure. In this investigation 15 different analyses were made of the body, occupying us from the 2.6 th to the 31st of Dec., and the conclusions at which we ar rived from the results of our investigations were these : First, that all parts of the body of the deceased examined by us contained antimony. In the stomach and intestines the antimony was partly in a soluble form, while in the liver, heart, spleen, kidney, and lungs, it had been the result of absorption during life. Secondly, the largest quantity of antimony was found in the rectum and its contents ; next, in the stomach and its contents ; then, in the bile taken from the gall bladder; and the small est quantity was found in the lungs. Thirdly, the presence of antimony in the contents of the rectum, or lower bowel, proves that the discharges from the bowels of the, deceased contained antimony up to the time of her death; that she was passing antimony by purging when she died. We carnet.) that conclusion, of course, before we heard the evidence of yesterday. And the presence of this mineral is sufficient to account for the vomiting, or diarrhoea, or both, from which the de ceased was stated to have suffered. The fourth conclu , elusion was this—from the presence of antimony in the stomach of the deceased we infer that a preparation of antimony must have been given to the deceased a few hours before her decease. Fifthly, from the discovery of antimony in the stomach and intestines, especially in the rectum or lower bowel, we infer that the antimonial copper, if not taken by the deceased as the result of a series of accidents—not one accident, bnt a series—was improperly administered to her, either by iotioraece or design. Sixthly, that, in our o pi n i on , the antimony foun by us in the body of the deceased has not been the result of ono large dose, but of several doses taken at in tervals some days before her death, and to within a few hours of her death. Seventhly, that the antiinonial pre paration taken by deceased was what is commonly called tartar emetic (this white, powder), and this may or may not have acted as a poison, according to circumstances. ft may or may not have been the cause of deceased's death. In the event of the existence of any natural cause the illness of the deceased, it may have accelerated her death by producing great depression and exhaustion of the powers of life. Eighthly, in the examination cf the stomach, bowels, and other organs of the deceased we could not detect any changes as the result of natural disease. There was nothing to account for death in the shape of disease. On the other hand, there was nothiuo in these appearances inconsistent with the death of the deceased from frequent doses of tartar emetic. That is all, sir. By ?'lr. Deane—From the evidence that I have heard, I have no reason to alter the conclusions that I have drawn in any one respect. I heard Mr. Bamford'oevi dence with regard to the admixture of the medicine, and I say that had tartar emetic been substituted by that gentletnan for tartarate of potash, other and more serious symptoms would have shown themselves in the deceased than those which I have heard described in evidence. I must add one thing to that. It is my belief that she had had tartar emetic, and was suffering from its effects be fore Mr. Bamford saw her—that is to say, assuming that he saw her on the Sunday. Tartar emetic may be taken in small doses ; in ordinary articles of food it may be taken without being perceptible to the taste. By Mr. Smith—The smallest quantity of a dose of antimony taken at once is 10 grains to produce death'. You have it there. [Mr. Smith had in his hand Dr. Taylor's work upon poisons.] Assuming that antimony had been - given in a liquid state, the symptoms after taking antimony would have followed in proportion to the dose. Tie "James's Powder" there are entail doses of antimony ; and in such a case as severe cold it would or would not, according to circumstances, do good ; but have never known it in a medicinal dose produce vomiting and sickness. Ido not agree with Dr. James when he says that its administration in such doses may produce such effects. I never knew of a death from antimony of such a description as this ; and yet the death of this lady is quite conformable with her death from poison, and at the same time death from any other cause. Mr. Smith—lf small quantities of antimony should be given in frequent doses, would there be constipation and vomiting ? Dr. Taylor—Certainly not. Constipation may have arisen from some natural cause. It is not a natural symptom from the taking of doses in small quantities. My opinion is that constipation was an accidental cir cumstance in the illness of the dechased not connected with the cause of death. I have known 500 cases of death from poison, very few of which exhibited the same aspects. Every case will be attended with its own symp toms, depending upon the circumstances under which the poison is taken and the state of the body at the time. There is a very frequent state of the stomach which pro duces vomiting—that is, ulceration ; but there was no ulceration in this case. And when I saw antimony throughout the whole system and no ulceration, I came to no other conclusion than that she died from antimony. We can detect from a five-hundredth or a thousandth part of a grain of tartar emetic when it is present. In the stomach there was found from three-quarters of a grain to a grain of tartar emetic, and in the rectum pro bably a grain. There was antimony throughout the whole body. In the whole of the tissues there could not have been less than a grain and a-half or two grains. From the results of our experiments upon two ounces of the liver I was satisfied that the deceased was satu rated with antimony. I have frequently found anti mony in the dead ; but I never found so much in absorp tion. The liver absorbs the poison very quickly. It would contain a larger quantity from its being a large organ and full of blood. Mr. Smith—lf antimony had been administered three weeks ors month before the death of the deceased, would the same results have been seen ? Dr. Taylor—l think not ; but I should form my opi nion from the appearances of the body. Supposing the antimony to have been given in one small dose and then have stopped, I think I should not have found so much if a period of three weeks had elapsed. Supposing it to have been a fortnight or three weeks before her death, the appearances would not have been preserved, because the tendency of the human system is, that immediately the poison ceases to be given it passes away from the frame. Supposing there was fever, I should not recom mend the use of antimony. Mr. Smith—Provided it were taken in conjunction with fever,' I suppose it would not have been long in being removed. Dr. Taylor--I think it would have been longer, be cause of the rapid circulation. It is not necessary to a case of poison that cramp should follow, because that symptom depends upon the effects of poison upon the different parts of the system. There might be cramp, but it would not necessarily follow. The whole of the Bamford —My poor dear Anne expired . Dividend ; Amount Name of Company. per 1 of Paid. Price. Annum. i Share. . - £ s. d. £ a. d. British •• •• •• .. •• .... - - - ' - Ditto Irovinclal.... 11. 20 0 0 20 0 0 23 Brighton ..........., 6/. 20 0 0 20 0 0 15 City of London .. •• .. 4L Os. 100 0 0 150 5 u - Continental (4th Cap.) . - 10 0 0 20 0 0 - Equitable.. .• •• .. ••••• 21. 10s. 150 0 0 all 33% Groat Central ....... 8/ per cent. 10 0 0 all 11% Imperial ...• ........ 101.& bonus. : 50 0 0 all - Independent ......... 51. 40 0 0 • lt - L0nd0n•............. - ;50 0 0 Of i - Do., Pail. Preference 61. per cont. ;25 0 0 „ , - Pbceriix ............. 41. per cent.) 60 0 0 52 0 0 ! - Ratcliff .. - . ....... 51. ; 100 0 0 16 0 0 " 16 United General ...... 21. 10s. 150 0 0 all I 19% Westminster Chartered 4k per cent.l 50 0 0 '7/ I - Ditto, New ........ - '5O 0 0 10 o 0 10 WATER-WORKS. Dividend Amount Name of Company. I per of Paid. Price. Annum. Share. X a. d. 4 s. d. East London - Grand Junction .. 4'. per cnt. 50 0 0 all - Kent ...... .......... " 4'. per cut. 100 0 0 -78 M Lambeth ...... • ..... ; - 100 0 0 - - New River Company .. , 21. 10s. - - - - Southwark &Vauxhall 51. per cnt. 100 0 0 - 89 West Middlesex - 51. per cent. 61 0 0 - 89 BRIDGES. Dividend 1 Amount Name of Company. per of raid. Price. Annum. Share. £ s. d. £ s. d. fltingerford - .. • • • . • • - - - 12 Southwitri: ..... ..... - 'llO 0 0 - - Ditto New of 7% p.c. 1/. per cent. ILO 0 0 - - Ws terloo - ;100 0 0 - - Ditto Old Ann. of Si. IL 14s. Bd. 160 0 0 - - Ditto Nw ditto of 71. 1/. 105. 4d. ,I 40 0 0 - - I Vauxhall .......... • • 965. 70 10 3 - 2114 DOCKS. Dividend Amount Name of Company. per of Paid. Price. Annum. Share. - - ' - £ s. d. £ s. d. Commercial .......... 51. pr cent. Stock. I Stock. - East and West India.. 61. pr cent. Stock. - - East Coantry.. 2os. per sh. - - - London .... ... •• - i 101 Ditto Bonds 4l. per cent. - - - lt. Katnarine ...... •• 4 per cent. Stock. - -. ' outhampton - Victoria .......... - I 51. per cent. 20 0 0 1 10 0 0 ; Ini JOINT-STOCK BANKS. . Dividend Amount Name of Company. per of Paid. Price. Annum. ! Share. - --- - 4 s, d. X s. 4. Australasia........... 201. per cent. 40 0 0 all SO British North American 61. per cent. 50 0 0 PP 65 Commercial of London. i 10/.per cent. 100 0 0 20 0 - Colonial ............ • • 5/. per cent. 100 0 0 25 0 - lonian. • • •• • • • 61. per cent. 25 0 0 25 0 - Lond. Char. Bk. of Aus. - 20 0 0 all 1556 London and County .. i 10". per cent. 50 0 3 20 0 - Londn and Westminatr 1141. percent. 100 0 0 20 0 - London Joint-Stock ... 12/. per cent. 50 0 0 10 0 - Provincial of Ireland.. 181. per cent. 100 0 0 25 0 - Ditto, New........ 1 8/,per cent. 10 0 0 all - Nationr.l of Ireland.... { 6!, per cent. 50 0 0 22 10 - Nat. Provincial of Eng. ; Br. per cent. 100 0 0 35 0 - Ditto, New ........ 181. per cent. 20 0 0 10 0 - Oriental Bank Corpora. 8 1 . p. ct.&bs. 25 0 0 all 2 , 8 South Australia .. .• .. 114/ p.ct.&bs. 25 0 0 o - Union of Australia.- • '3Ol. per cent. 25 0 0 7314 Ditto .............. 301. per cent. - 2JO 0 - Union of London ..... W. per cent. 50 0 0 10 0 0 - Union of Madrid ..... ' - 40 0 0 all - -- - ---- -- - CANALS. Names of 'p, Dividend Names Of ~ Dividend Companies. A Price p er per Companies . '' , Price. .L,l Anntun. to Annum.; cn -----, IXI 1 X ' A shtn 3:01dh l 93 71. p. ct.l 145 Macclesfield. 100 21. 10s. 51 Barnsley ...• 160 - , - Neath .. •• • • 100 161. - Brkiikasibrg' 150 41. - Oxford.. •• • • 100 - - Birmingham 1 401 41. 90 Peak Forest. 78 51. Os. 76 Coventry.... 100, 257. - Regent's •. •. 30 11 145 Derby . •... 100 61. 15s. I 84 Rochdale.... 85 11. 10s. 76 Ellsmre&Clisl G 92% p. ct. - Somrset Coal 140. - - OrandJunctn 100 3i. pr. et. 36 Do. Lk Fdst 12 - - Do., 6 pr.Ct. l 10 61. pr. ct. 1114 Stftrd &Wore 14 0 281. 420 Grand Surrey! 1001 4/. - Shrewsbm7.. 125 - Grand Union 100' 1/. Os. - Stonrbrid::G.. j 451 12/. 290 Kennt & Avn l 39, 6s. Od. 6% Severn and 1 21. 28 Lancaster .. 1 100' - --Wye Rail. .5 26 Leeds &Livrp 100 1 25/. 470 Warwick & 21. 1 100 25 Leicester .... :1001 5/. 4954 Birming. i Leiestr &Nth 831 - - Warwick & 1 I 21. 10 Lougliborogh 1121 701. 550 Napton... j 100 Monmouth sh 100 - - Worcstr &i 781 21. 21 Mntgiuktrysh 100 - - Birming. Mel tn Mwbry 1001 - - Wilts & Brits - 1 10s. Od. 4% INSURANCE COMPANIES. Dividend Amount Name of Company, per of Paid. Price. Annum. Share. £ a. d. X a. d. Albion .•.- • • .. 3/. 103. 500 0 0 50 0 0 83 .1111ance Brit. and For. 7/. 14s 6d.bs 100 0 0 11 0 0 16 Ditto Marine ... .... 31. p.c. & bs. 100 0 0 25 0 0 42 inc:ior .............. 6 per cent. 5 0 1 0 0 - Artlas Irgus Life ......... - 41. per cent. 100 0 0 25 0 0 - etritish Commercial .. 71.103. 50 0 0 5(1 0 634 Clerici.ged.& Geu.Life spr ct. & be. j 100 0 0 110 0 0 21% :-"ounty .... .. •.•. - • . 4/. 100 0 0 10 0 0 1.20 C rown ~,. ~ _ ...... 17s. Od 50 0 0 50 1 it % Eagle .. ___ Equity and Law...... 4% per cent. 100 0 0 5 0 6 6% Europenn Life l/. 20 0 0 , an 18% General.- - ...... _ 6/. 5 0 0 I ~ 54, Globe ........ 5, per cent. Stock. 106 renardlan ............ 5 , per cent 100 0 0 47 5 0 50% Imperial Fire......... 12/. per cent 500 0 0 50 0 0 340 Tinned:ll Life Indemnity Marine.... 1. 33 & 3/ . 1 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 77 Law Fire .......• -• • 23. & 2s. bs lon 0 0 210 0 Law L1ee............. _ 100 0 i 0 0 0 59 Legal and General Life - 50 0 0 2 0 9 b 3 ,1 London London Ship.... ..... - Marine ..... _,,- _ , 18s.per share 100 0 0 28 0 0 40 Ned. Invlid & Gen. Life 4% r per ct. 50 a 0 2 0 0 3 % Minerva Monarch ...... - - 5 0 0 1 0 0 - National Loan Fund 5l. per cent. 20 0 0 210 0 - Palladium Life,- 5l. per cent. 50 0 0 210 0 3 i 5 Pelican .......... •• •• - - 45% - Phoenix - - 180 - •••• Profeseonal Life."... M. per cent. 5 0 010 0 - Provident Life........ 1/. bs. & be. 100 0 0 10 0 4 3856 Rock Life .. .. .. 7s. 5 3 0 010 0 8 Royal Exchange ...... 10/. per cent. stock. all 230 Sun Fire 6l 108. - 9 1 .-- - •••• Ditto Life • • • • 1/ 143. - , 55 United Xingdom •. • • 4/. p. ct. & bs. 20 0 0 4 ' 0 0 - Universal Life ..... •• • 51. per teat. 100 0 0 10 0 0 Victoria Life ........5i. per cent. - 412 6 5% MISCELLANEOUS. Dividend Amount Name of Company. per of I Paid. Price. Annum. Share. ---- - X e. d. X a. s. Assam Tea ••..•• • • •• U. 50 0 0 20 0 0 - Auction Mart •••. • • • • 2 1 4 per cent. 50 0 0 Australian Aerlculturl 11.1 s. 100 0 0 17 10 0 26 1 4 Australian Trust •• .. 8/. pee cent. - 25 0 0 - Australian Royal Mall 5/. 10 0 0 all - Anglo-Mexican Mint.. 11 10s. 10 0 0 all - British American Land Its. - 40 0 0 - Canada ......... •• .. 61. percent. 100 0 0 82 10 0 Pa% Do. 5 per cent Bonds 51. per cent. - - - . 6 per cent. • • 61. per cent - Ditto, - 1C5% City Nuvigatlon Bonds - ._ _.- Electric Telegraph .. 6 per cent. 25 0 0 24 0 0 - Tlitto •. - - - - Equitable Reverelonry 71 pr. cent. 100 0 0 100 0 0 - Ditto New ...... . - 50 0 0 1 17 10 0 Gen. Revers. & Invest. sp.c. & bs, 100 0 0 100 0 0 Gen .' 1 team Navigation 10 p. ct. 15 0 0 14 0 0 27 Hudson's 8ay........ - Stock. - 1 Hungerford .....,... 2/. 53. 100 0 0 1 00 0 0 - - London Institution ... - - i .... - London Reversionary 51 per cent. 15 0 0 all Russell Institution.... - - 1 2 10 0 - • Price's PatentCand. C o 101. p er c ent. 20 0 0 1 7 10 - • Reversionary Int. Soc. 041. pr cent. 100 0 0 'lOO 0 Royal Mail Steam.... 41. p. share. 100 0 0 60 0 0 77 I South A ustraliein Land 61. per cent. 25 00 I all 34% / Trust and Loan Comp. Upper Canada -••- 120 00) 5 0 0 - 1 LIST OF SCOTTISH COMPANIES' PRICES. Dividend I Anl o ,.. n t Name of Company. per of Paid. Price. Annum. Share. £ a. d. X s. d. Bank of Scotland ..•• 72. per cent. 100 0 0 100 0 0 1821 0 British Linen Company 81. per cent 100 0 0 100 0 0 21 9 / 1 0 Caledonian Bank .. ••• 81. per cent. 10 0 0 210 0 3 1 18s City of .41asgow Bank 51. per cent. 10 0 0 CO ' 0 ' l llos Clydesdale Bank .... 5 3 1 . p cent 20 0 0 10 3 0 2 14s C mmercial Bank .. 71. per cent. 500 0 0 100 0 0 21 9 / 1 1 Eastern Bank.. •• .... ---• Per cent. 25 0 0 10 0 0 11 o s Edinb. & Glasgow.... 334 i. p cent . 5 0 0 5 0 0 4/. 19s Exchange Bnk of Scot.. ..... National Bank ...... 536 per cent. 100 0 0 10 0 0 171/0s North of Scotland Rank 5/.percent 20 0 0 210 0 1 1 .164 Royal Bank of e coll. .. 5/. per cent. 100 0 0 100 0 0 132110 Union Bank of Scot. ... 8/. per cent. 100 0 0 5 0 0 0 92/ Os Western Bank •....... 71. per cent. 50 0 0 00 0 0 73/15s klilance Fire and Ll'e.. 8% /pr cent. 100 0 0 11 0 0 le/15, British Guarantee ... 41. per cent. 10 0 0 2 0 0 1/. 8s Caledonian Fire Iwo , . . 10/.per cent. 100 0 0 , 10 0 0 25/ Os City of . ;itISgONV LilE , 6/. per cent. 0 0 2 0 0 it. 81 Co on!al Li 1 s ......... 51. per cent. 00 0 0 1 0 05/ 5s Edinburgh Life Insur. 61.1er cont. 1 00 0 0 15 0 0 26/10s Eng. & Scot, La's Life 5/, ‘ ler cent. 50 0 0 3 5 0 41. 88 , Lne Assoc. o Reat.and 6/.percent. 10 0 0 110 06/ 10a Nations, Fire and Life 61. per cent. 10 0 0 1 0 0 2/. 1 s North British Insur... 71. per cent. 200 0 0 20 0 0 33/ Os Scottish Union Insrnc. 7341. pr cent. 20 0 0 1 0 0 ~ 10s , Standard Life ........ 51. per cent. 60 0 0 7 0 0 0/ Os I United oep. Aesneguiee 61. per cent. 10 9 0 1 I 0 ABERDEEN-JAN. 11. Potato oats 26s Od to 27s Gd }4olbs per bushel Common oats 24s Od to 25s Od Bere 35s Od to 36s Od i 531133 Barley 35s Od to 3 s Od j 'Wheat, red (spring)64s Od to 668 Od 1 621bR „ white 70s Od to 77s Od Oatmeal 20s 9d to 21s 6,1 per boll. Flour 60s Od to 61s Od per sack. PROVISION MARKET. Beef, per lb 6(1 to 9d Butter, p lb. Os 10(1 to s 111 Mutton, per lb 6d to 8d I Eggs, p doz. OslOd to 1s 61 Veal, per lb. 6d to 8d Hens, p pair Os Od to 3s 6d Pork, per 5t...5s 9d to 6s Od Chickens,do.ls Od to 2i. 6d Salmon, per lb ......Os to Os Ducks, do., 2s 6d to Os 03 Grouse, per brace ..... Os to Os Ducklings,do Os Od Od Tallow, p stone, ss9d to 6s Od I Turkeys, each3s ( d to 4e 03 Potatoes, pr peck, 6(1 to i d f Geese, do., Os Od to On Od Butter for exportation (present cure) per cwt.BCs Od to 84s Eggs, wholesale price, per dozen . Bd to 9 RETAIL PRICES. • Flour —s Od to 3s 2d I Barley flour, 141b.0s t o 2 5 2.1 Oatmeal,l4lb Os Od to 2s 2d „ dust, Os toOs 10d Beremeal .... Os Od to 2s Od „ per lb 2d to 2id. Peasemeal... Os Od to 2s 10d Side, Bd 4-lb. 10af...10d. 2-Ib. 10af...5d. Cheese, per imperial stone, Os to 4s. Gd. DUBLIN-JAN. 11. A very poor supply of all kinds of grain to-day. The market generally was rather firmer than of late, and we note wheat fid and oats 3d dearer than on Tuesday. Bar ley moved off slowly at about that day's currencies. Scarcely a transaction took place in Indian corn, and our quotations are nominal. White wheat, 42s Od to 45s Od ; red ditto, 38s to 43, 6 i ; barley, 14s Od to 22s 6d. ; oats, 14s Od to 16s 3d ; rapeseed, 40s Od to 44s Od per brl ; oatmeal, 153 6d to 17s 6d ; baknd flour, 25s Od to 293 Od per owt; Imtiaueorn, 43s 61 to 459 Od per 480 lbs. S'EABORIVB MAILS. ;N signlftes that the mails arc sent mow the General Poet office y the night—and M by the morning-4espatch.) COVNTELt4 Fro:.. •;•• Por • W • i 7.?; Laverroo , Jan. 14 Jan. 8 Day IV hill Pfl in General t'i)w , Ofilce, Lonclew,. Etvor! , kmerica(byitrit.paytA 1%4 \ctorlev.tby Unitzd S•s. l oackot) arnerich (by LT Atht.,,sl packet) ti ~ .,i3tralia (via Soutt, ampton) .... M. into (viu Marseilles) I )itto (via Cape of Goo.). Hopo) ............N &fries (West Coast)..Nl l 3j or the month . A.;exandria..........Nli?, 9, 24, & 3fi ott,.. 31ex.andria..........1W 4th & 20th of mop:. Bahamas of tbo rion''• tele= . N 'ally • •• • • 3razil .......... . • M,9211 of the m , nth luenoa Ayres ........m'9tla o. th, uGotit, Oapeuf (.400bt iiil~tia -.Tv er.pc of Good Hope .ti '.;ale de Verde r 9th o• ir, tto ,,tt, Ceylon (see India) Ceylon .. N _ _ _ f z i e3 .35 Wed., &Fri 5412,33k.17th r,f mont, Chins . . Once a month.... Constantinople i 3,13, ro Oenstantinople „ & 20th of num, (.3 ont. of Europe M & N 7.4ot:daily , Egypt (see India) France ........ Id & NTlvice , daily Gibraltar „ „ 5,114, 7,17, 20, 27 In, Gzeeco (see India) 4reytown 2rid & 17th at rnOri. Him - burgh Tuesday 86 Friday Havannah of the month Holland ......! Honduras ......... 111117t,i :the mon:h.! 4th 20th of inoli. ! (viaSonthanipt.)ll4 Endia (via Marseilles)l4,9th&2 l ith of month lonian Wes (see India)l7, 17, & 27 of mot, Ireland & N ITwiec daily hl7 9 17 & 27 of In. l ri•• .• •• •• •• •• •• P Madeira .......... 9th of - the mouth Vatieira gaits (see India) !23(1 of month Malts ............ Mauritius (see India) Mauritius •• •••••• . • N MIMIC° •• • •Ir Now Granada New Zealand ...• .• •• •• li Papal mates Peninsula ..........m Peru .• •• •• •••• • • Ni Port Natal ..........N Sicily so •• •• •• •• •• Tuscany .• •• •• •• •.1"• 'Venezuela:...... Van Diemen's Lim d (so , Australia) ....... Wet 8, 18. & 28 of mun. 114th of the mcniti.l 21pi of the month.: sthlsth2sthofmon. 21 & 17thof month !Bv private aYia : 5 0115th2hthormen.1 Ithl7th27thofmon.l 2cl & 27th of mon. fly private ship...; s thlath2isthoftnon,! I hthl s th2hthnfrnon. l ;SWSal7th OtttlOnth & 17th o mont' Southamptan 1 & 16 mpg When any of these dates fall on a Sunday. the malls wlll ••• de. !patched on the following day, with the exception of the In WS onthampton), and the Malta. both of which will be despatch. A t t ,e preceding day. SHARE MARKETS. LIVERPOOL, JAN. 12. STOCK EXCHANGE. —The tone of the market has been slack to-day, and prices a slight decline upon yesterday. Lancashire and Yorkshire, 7 6—Caledonian, 271—Mid lands, 621 3 London and North Western, 931 South Eastern, 1 6.18.9. —North British, 78. MANCHESTER, JAN. 12. STOOK EXCHANGE.--The market to-day has been doing a quiet business, but prices unchanged. Eastern Counties, 8 3 - 16—Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincoln, 23--South Eastern and Dover, 16 15-16—Lancashire and Yorkshire, 76 Birmingham Guaranteed Stock, 68 Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincoln, 6/. Pref., 7 16 p. BIRMINGHAM, JAN. 12. STOCK EXCHANGE. - The market was rather inactive today, and prices about stationary. Great Westerns, 52* —Great Western Birmingham Guaranteed Stock, &it to 67 London and North Westerns, 9:IP —Birmingham and Stour Valleys, B—South Staffords, 2.18.9. d.. LEEDS, JAN. 12. STOCK EXCHANGE.—A very inactive business to-day. Leeds, 751—Midlands. 83—Barnsley Canal. 78 —Lead New Gas, 27—Ditto (101. pd.), 13t. DUBLIN, JAN. 12. STOCK EXCEIANGE.—Three per Cent. Consols, Ditto for Account, Feb. 7, 86 #—New Three pe) Cent. Stock, 863 6. I—Ditto,1 — Ditto, for Account, 7th Feb., 86# i'— Great Southern and Western, 51$—Killarney Junction (for account), i—Dublin and Belfast Junction (451, pd.), 404—Ditto (for account), 45 —National Bank, 311 x d.— Royal Bank, 2N—Hibernian Bank. 3 3—Mining Company of Ireland, 134 Irish South Eastern (for account), 5j Dublin and Drogheda, 5 8—Dublin and Wicklow, st. [ADVERT ISEMENT.]—HoIIoway's Pills a certain Re medy fnr Liver and Stomach Complaints.—The daughter Of Mr. Thomas Todd, of Houghton-le-Spring, was for a long time afflicted with a disordered state of the liver, bowel complaints, indigestion, and sickness after par taking of any food however simple. She had recourse to a variety of remedies, but, urfortunately, without being benefited ; at last, like thousands of others, she commenced taking Holloway's pills, and, by persevering with this admirable remedy for four weeks ' she was per fectly cured, an d now en j oys t h o b est of health. Sold, by all medicine vendors throughout the world, at Pro fessor Holloway's establishments, 244, Strand, London, and 80, Maiden-lane, New York ; by A. blampa, Con stantinople ; A. Guidicy, Smyrna ; and E. Muir, Malta. BIRTHS. OP A 80N. On the 12th inst., at 17, Cadogan-place, the wife of Mr. Thomas Broadwood. On the 13th inst., at 14, Queen Anne-street, Cavendish• square, the wife of Alex. Halley, M.D., F.G.S. 03' ♦ DATIGHTIR. On the 12th inst., at 67, Glocester-place, Portmaa• square, the wife of Major Robert Guthrie MacGregor. On the 12th inst., at 16, Belinda -terrace, Canonbury square, Mrs. Benjamin Bradley.. MARRIED. On the 29th ult., at Lamberton, in Scotland, and on the 12th inst., at the parish church of St. Gregory by St . P au l, London, Mr. Alfred Waterhouse, of St. Paul's churchyard, to Ann Mary, only child of Mr. R. E. Branston, of Den• mark-hill. On the 12th inst., by special licence, at St.reorge'a, Hanover-square, William, second son of Mr. Joseph Hol brook, of Charlton, Somerset, to Louisa, only child o f th e late Mr. Paul Pouting, of Cambridge-street, London. DIED. On the 11th inst., at 18, Paddington green, Captain T. Allen, aged 72. On the 12 h inst., at the Grove,Watford, the Hon. Mrs. G. V]lliers, aged Sl. On the 11th inst., Mr. George Schofield, of 276, Regent street, age 45. On the 10th inst., at 33, N o tti ng h am - p l ace , M a j or Stones, late of the 13t h Light Dragoons. On the 11th inst., at Newton Hall, co. Northumberland, Captain S. E. Widdrington. On the 11th inst., at Buckhurst, near Wokinghan 2 , Berke, Wm. Heelas, Esq., aged 80. On the Bth inst., Eldred Harrison, Esq., solicitor, of Kendal, aged 34. On the inst., at Rinellan Lodge, Ross-shire, Sir Alex. Mackenzie, Bart., of Corel. On the 9th inst., Mrs. Caroline Crane, wife of Mr. T. F. Crane, of 6, Castle street, St. Mary axe, aged 59. LONDON Printed and Published by MURDO you , of No. "iLnin,t, en I) rt, at The Sun Oqice, N. , 112, Strand, in th, Ofrectr , ::, a 6 tltAs Savoy, in the county of Middlesex, Monday, January 14, LtSf.'6. isauthvv, • Jan. 26 7...comtota,p, Dover !Uurertai Jan. 6 Plynoto Dover Sottr.hivmt.. South,: rn :.)over .• ;411 Dl* .`47B,riotts Por, iSouth Jan, 16 Jan. I Uncnrtsl !auuttiArni, louttitunp, Jan. 15 ,Trt.Th.‘g 11Nover . athara to 71 Dov i:r an. 20 IDovo! ISouthatupto, Twtcodall ITwlcod. , !SatithriUlptufl Loudon ..... jeouthamptor , 16. Dover ....... Dal+ Southampton 16thotmo Plymouth .. Jan. 20 Dover ...... j Dover ....Y. 1101.7 head Southampton 'Jan. 15 j Southaniptot Liverpool •ith a Yo un , webbed , leno ; toloo t o , Wagg, r The .T 1 Miss Sta for Yout Miss Bu aniggle, Flirt, Mr. Pacl Sums Lessons ?ham Ca mad 11. Fish a a:hooka: 'Youn g t a Q-Arn 'MACK; - Robb and eh Doublesi 14411 ; CI and Nos, _kootowel ' je t , leant J 1 11 11.., cl"— a Afloi n k ey eruito 11i Ori b 4 a e l*lho t u „ . P 1 The of ir on stri tiee' S tO 1711 00tli_ l ittenges II great Xll o f s Je k l ous 111%king % kle T,.y, notl bre The Rop eg 4°1114 11 1, 44Pid: klaatine *brand "tight, :Dover 'Jan. 20 ' BoUthaniPtOr , Zan. 1 'Dover i v So a u ri t o lt u a s ni p p o t r o t p (Dover Southampton Sent h ampton i Various ports'lUno.rtoo ;Dover .... Dover 8011thato ptonil & 16 mo Mt cf EI IJ. next, princtp • The i Cattlnc Prie( guinea lerY. IC appilca Accorrir Door Cori( AMA' 3. Old In The B‹ The fate bi extra) boxes ls. MOB: TEI After Indu Elk ; Phlel Para MQet nieal rime. Mum Shak Whic tenzi and REY Jack! Little tri Portywi lfutupti r ,„hOl Milt a n d slistingu *any L occasion Toddlek Messrs. " They; "The An( Jusl