The Sun. — London, England, 1834-09-08 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. Mr. O'Connell has commenced a series of epistles to Lord Duncannon, on the sins of the Whigs towards Ireland since their accession to office ; the first of which we shall insert to-morrow. He has noted down, he says, no less than twenty-one separate charges, which fall within the categories included in the chapter of Irish history which he is writing. Three of the charges are disposed of in' the first epi stle, and the remaining , eighteen charges are reserve d f or future flights of elo quence.- The charges in this first letter turn out to be, the makin - g Lord Plunkett Chancellor, Mr. Joy Chief Baron, Mr.- Doherty Chief Justice of the Com mon Pleas, and Mr. Blackburne Attorney-General. As to Lord Plunkett, there never, he says, lived a public man in Ireland so devoid of popularity. " There was something about him which made it impossible to place confidence in him—a Presbyterian in his days of poverty, a Protestant as lie grew into wealth." His object has been, he contends, to heap offices, livings, and emoluments upon his sons. Mr. Joy was an Orange Tory. Mr. Doherty had no great repu tation for legal knowledge, and he would have accepted an assistant barristership. With respect to Mr. Blackburne, of all the members of the Irish bar, he was the very worst choice that could have been made by the Whigs. In making out his catalogue of faults and follies of the Whigs, Mr. O'Connell has, he says, two objects in view --Ist, to vindicate the po pular party from the charge of having, without any just provocation, evinced hostility to the Whigs; and, next, to reconcile, if possible, the popular party with the present Minister. " To effect a reconciliation (lie says) it is absolutely necessary to point out which party has been hitherto in the wrong ; and if the po pular party had been so, I should be the first to advise them to retrace their steps, and to atone °for their er rors." Though we are as sensible as Mr. O'Connell can be, that the Orangemen are not to be coaxed into any thing like attachment to the present Government, we cannot see the advantage, if his object be concilia tion, of recapitulating all the sins of commission and omission of the Whig Ministry since November, 1830. We are not among the admirers of Lord Plunkett, and we always thought that Mr. Doherty's promo tion to the Bench was a questionable measure, though Mr. O'Connell has himself admitted that he is one of the best of the Irish Judges. But Mr. O'Connell, in his anxiety to convict the Whig Ministry of injustice to the Catholics, is himself grossly unjust towards the individuals be. has arraigned in this epistle. Mr. O'Connell hai unquestionably much influence with his countrymen ; but of course his influence must always depend in a great measure on the use he makes of it. Were he -to be thought a lukewarm advocate of their claims, he would be supplanted by others. Some allowance ought, therefore, to be made for the difficul ties inseparable from Mr. O'Connell's position. In deed, in this letter, he does not hesitate to say— " I am ready to aid in the perfect reconciliation of the . people with the Ministry ; but I have neither the power nor the inclination to do so unless you will conter on that people, not sweet and soft words, but substantial and distinct acts of friendship and protection." Ministers have a straightforward course to pursue. They ought not to submit to any improper' dictation from Mr. O'Connell, merely because he is possessed of great influence ; but neither ought they, on the other hand, to avoid doing what is right, merely because Mr. O'Connell has told them of it, from the puerile weakness of not wishing to be thought under the guidance of Mr. O'Connell. We fear that there is but too much truth in Mr. O'Conpell's charge, that nearly all the influential offices in the management of affairs are committed to the decided enemies of civil and religious liberty—to men equally hostile to the government which employs and pays them, anti to the people over wham they are placed. We have, indeed, heard that this character applies to almost every man in office in Dublin. It may be impossible to remedy this evil at once, but a commencement should, at all events, be made. Mr. O'Connell endeavours, at some length, to show that the Orangemen are without legitimate cause of com plaint. The Standard says, " Briefly we will tell Mr. O'Connell of what the Protestants (for Protest ants substitute Orangemen) have to complain—not cer tainly of any law or statute, but of the privation of the protection of all those laws to which they have ever yielded prompt obedience and zealous support. As an apostle of anarchy, Mr. O'Connell may think the privation of the protection of the law no grie vance ; but, nevertheless, the danger of being mur dered, the certainty of being robbed, through the ma gistrates neglect, are grievances, and serious grievances too, to men whose morals forbid them ptotectine e , them selves by the menace of retaliatory murder, or to make good their losses from robbery by making free with.. the property of others."—Why, the magistracy is chiefly .in the hands of Protestants, and if the Orangemen - have to complain of the privation of the protection of law, they have themselves chiefly to blame. The -complaint amounts to a confession that under 'the ascendancy the Irish have been alienated from their laws. The laws have been made by the Orange ascendancy, and administered by them. The people hid no attachment to the laws, and little Confidence in the administration of them ; and hence a habit has been formed of combining to elude the law. This is the necessary and in evitable result of conducting Government not for the benefit of the people, but of an ascendancy. The people must feel that they have an interest in the execution of the laws, or the laws will not be executed. The system of governing through an as cendancy was continued till it fairly broke down under the Duke of Wellington. His Grace acknowledged that he would not have emancipated the Catholics could he have-avoided it ; but the measure was essen tial to the safety of the empire. Emancipation was but the means to an end, and that end is the placing his Majesty's Catholic subjects on the same footing in every respect with the Protestants. So long as the Orangemen cherish the idea that they may preserve their old ascendancy, so long will Ireland be agitated. Party having long run so high in Ireland, it is impos sible that its effects should not continue to be felt under even the wisest and most moderate Government. It will, for some time, be no easy matter, therefore, to satisfy either the Orangemen or the Catholics. Jus tice and impartiality must, however, in time produce their fruits. Morning Chronicle. If, as a quaint old writer says, " it is pleasant music to hear disarmed malice threaten when it cannot strike," the vocal performances at the grand Conservative din ner in Lancashire must have sounded most agreeably to the public ear. The whole thing was in the rail way fashion—the Tory company came by the rail-way, they went by the rail-way, and they talked in the rail way, and at a fiery speed. For men who professedly desire to hold things together, these gentlemen have a strangely explosive style of conversation. Except in the writings of Messrs. Hetherington and Cleave, we know no match for the talk of the professors of order and quietism. A spru ng mine, a fired born-shell, a lighted petard, h as as good a title to the character of conservative. With similar aptness the engine which is said to discharge a stream of bullets as a fire-en gine _ discharges water, is styled a p ac ifi cator . A t t h e Lan cashire meeting the Chairman, Lord Wilton, set out by say i n g " We must endeavour to discriminate a spirit of loyalty and attachment to the laws and con stitution. We must endeavour to show the people the delusion attempted to be practised on them ; we them of the kindly f ee li ng th a t mus t convince exists towards them on our part, and instead of being, aq represented, wanton oppressors, we are their best friends—the friends of national enjoyment and liberty." In conformity with this advice Mr. Roby, the very next speaker, " discriminated the spirit of loyalty and attachment to the laws" by . raving of trai tors " wallowing in their filthy profanities in the sty of St. Stephen's !" Further, to show the people that the Conservatives are their best friends, he stated that the object of their meeting was to strengthen for a great struggle which is approaching, "to review their troops ere the battle," &c., to prepare " to combat a Whig-Radical mo ns t er , begotten by French malice on English credulity ;" by all which rodomontade is meant an attempt to beat down the influence of the people and to re-establish an oligarchy. Such is Mr. Roby 's method of showing the people that the Tories are their best friends. His bark, however, is worse than his bite, poor gentleman, for he, and such as he, may rail long. indeed before they rail the seal from off the bend of the reformed constitution. He and his friends may sooner batter down St: Paul's with pea shooters. Seeing this great enterprise before him, he says, " Each man can do something, and what soever he findeth to do let him do with all his might." Mr. Roby has spoken most rigorously up to his precept. Each man can talk nonsense, and finding that he can talk nonsense, Mr. Roby has talked non sensense with all his might. The same orator, with an amusing attempt at the sublime, said, " Having no hopes from a Government such as this--deserted, betrayed by the very men wlo should have been our protectors, we are to sit like Roman senators, with our garments decently folded, awaiting until the hordes of barbarians and plunderers shall see fit to extermi nate us. No !" No, indeed. They did not sit in the slightest degree, like Roman senators, with their garments decently folded ; but like a set of scolding, old women, with their garments disordered by a ram pant action, making a most indecent exposure. Ro man senators, forsooth I The Sabbath of the witches in the Faust is a simile incomparably apter. But they ride their broomsticks harmlessly, though not as they say, with garments decently folded like Roman senators, and their grotesque extravagance, though not without vice in intention, are without mischief in ef fect. Lord Skelmersdale, who followed Mr. Roby, launched into praise of the House of Lords and all its doings and undoings. In apology for its passing the Reform Bill, he said that it was done not from fear, but to oblige the King, who had pledged himself that the bill should pass. In what a statesmanlike point of view does this explanation place the conduct of the Lords. It is pretended that the Reform Bill is fraught with the destruction of the monarchy, and Lord Skel mersdale tells his Tory friends with exquisite simpli city, that the Lords passed the measure alleged to be pregnant with ruin to the monarchy, purely to oblige the Monarch, or to enable him to redeem his pledge to self-destruction, for to that, in substance, it comes, by the Tory showing I One of two things is clear— either that the Reform Bill is not so bad as.the Tory Lords describe it, or that the Tory Lords are not so wise and bold as they describe themselves. But, ac cording to Lord Skehuersdale, it was not only oblige his Majesty that the Lords passed the bill. He adds, " They consented to it also rather than see 100 of all sorts of persons forced into the House whose qua lification would be to vote as instructed." This is like the statement of the coxcomb in the French farce, that a lady died through love of him and dropsy on the chest. it requires no ghost to tell us that the dropsy had most to do with the effect. With the same mixture of causes, fortune-hunters declare that they marry partly for affection, and in some degree for 30,0001. Though the fear of the creation of peers comes in as an ac etiam, after the disposition to oblige the King, we cannot help think ing that it was the main cause. Mr. Hulton also favoured the Conservative company with a speech. We suppose that this is the Mr. Hulton who rejoices in describing himself as Mr. Hulton, of Hulton, lest he should be called Mr. Hulton, of Peterloo. If so, he is the Mr. Hulton who was one of the Magistrates implicated in the bloody business of the 16th of August, 1819. Such a man was peculiarly fitted to carry into effect the design of Lord Wilton—namely, to convince the people of the kindly feelings that exist towards them on the part of the members of the meeting, and the Tories generally. The lovingkind ness of Mr. Hulton had been experienced most prac tically, and certainly it was not of the sort that spareth the rod. With a language appropriate to his charac ter, this gentleman said, that since the passing of the Reform Bill, Conservative principles had spread with " a stable, stern, and unrelenting fixedness of pur pose." If his principles have been waxing more stern and unrelenting, Heaven have mercy on mobs where lie directs sabres. After reading the rant and rodo montade—the idiot's tale of sound and fury, signifying nothing--of the Lancashire Tory meeting, the thing that most strikes us is the prudence of the Duke of Wellington in holding himself aloof from it. His ab sence is the conspicuous circumstance, and it does ho nour to his discretion. Indeed, there was not a Tory of any mark or likelihood at the meeting, and the noise made was but the crackling of the burning sticks of the party. The shrewd and sensible Tories know that this is no time for parading their opinions, and that they have but one chance, which is to un-Tory them selves as quietly as possible. They see that it is a rout, and will not make a stand merely as a mark to be shot at, but slip off their uniforms, and covet a tem porary retirement, in which the people may pass an Act of amnesty, if fresh provocations are avoided.— Times. Lord Duncannon's visit to Ireland ought to be an object of considerable jealousy, if not of suspicion. Scarcely warm in his office, and, of course, uninformed of its duties, he sets off for Ireland, leaving the busi ness of the most important department in the State (which under existing circumstances it undoubtedly is) to the chapter of accidents, or to such care as those who have other. offices and duties to attend to can bestow upon it. That his Lordship may have very legitimate claims upon his presence in Ireland (if private claims can be allowed to supersede public duties) we do not deny. But, unfortunately, there is an awkwardness as to time about his movements, which, we repeat, renders them an object of jealousy, if not of suspicion. On this point we cannot ex press our own meaning better than in the words of one of our Correspondents in Ireland, who says— " In the present Administration Lord Duncannon is the adopted child of the Agitator, and is the in dividual who would, in all probability, be selected to make overtures for a junction between himself and the Government. To-day I have been informed, and I have reason to place reliance upon my authority, that an interview is appointed to take place between Mr. O'Connell and Lord Duncannon on the subject of the new appointments." This, if true, is indeed a fearful state of things, and holds forth a premium on agitation, not to say on spoliation and rebellion, never before heard or dreamt of. That the most flaming pa triotism has its price history, if we need go back to it, leaves no doubt ; and it has been frequently alle g ed as a fault both in the Duke of Wellington and Earl Grey's Government, that the price of the individual in question was not-long since found out and paid. There are those who think that it would have been money well laid out, both for the peace of England and of Ireland. But both sellers and purchasers, on these as well as on other occasions, may outstand their mar ket ; and there is now no boon or price which the Go vernment can hold out to Mr. O'Connell, which will not overwhelm them with disgrace, and which will not hold out, to all who choose to follow in his steps, at once a premium and an absolution to practices totally at variance with the safety and well being of so ciety. We would fain pause, then, before we credit the assertion made by Mr. O'Connell, that the Govern ment is in alliance with him in his avowed hostility to the Protestant Establishment ; we would fain pause before we fall into our correspondent's rumour—that Lord Duncannon, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, is in negotiation with Mr. O'Connell on the subject of the latter's elevation to office. It may be so ; but we trust, for the honour of British States men, hitherto never so tarnished, that it is not. Of Lord Duncannon, the alleged mediator on this occa sion, we would, assuming that there is any truth in the rumour, speak more in sorrow than in anger. Of Lord Duncannon's character as a landlord, and in all the relations of private life, too much, we believe can not be said in the way of praise ;- but as a person to whom it is fit -that the destinies of England or of Ire land should be confided, we look in vain for any proofs. Beyond the office of whipper-in and teller on a divi sion, his Lordship's political talent is unknown. While he has, however, a fame and reputation of one sort to make, he has a great deal on the other hand, to lose ; and if our counsel could reach his ear in the perilous crisis to which he is said to be approaching, that counsel would be to remember the recent fate of Mr. Littleton, and to shun, as he would the basilisk's touch, a touch which can only poison or destroy.-... Morning Herald. Mr. O'Connell's promised letter to Lord Duncan non on the grievances of the Irish Catholics his at length been published. It is a "grandis et verbosa epiitola," as truculent in spirit and perfidious in de- THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1834. sign as ever was sent .by Tiberius from his retreat at Capreea. Withal it is a clumsy and nerveless docu ment. In his last letter he avowed himself a Minis terialist, and amused his subjects with fairy visions of the great blessings that were in store for them under the Whig dynasty. Now he proposes to prove cate gorically the " faults, follies and crimes," of the Whig Government towards Ireland. There is no contradic tion or inconsistency in all this, as might appear to many. The secret coalition between him and the Go vernment, not entered into formally and . ratified on both sides, but dexteriously managed by intermediate agents, is still maintained, and likely to be maintained. He dwells on the past offences of the Government for two good reasons. His first is that they may not alarm his votaries by his professed confidence in the future measures of the Whigs, a confidence so much at variance with his former declarations and denun ciations against them. He th ere f ore abuses the Whigs of the past day lest the "people " should think of his former backing on the affair of " the wings," and say of him again, " Dan is a slippery thing." That would not do, for it would endanger the rent, which is the great end and aim of agitation. In the second place he opens a retreat for the Go vernment from those courses of policy which they formerly pursued in Ireland by holding forth their past actions to public ium, and warning them against a similar career inluture. He thus can say, " You see I attacked them when they deserved it, but if I expect better things from them in future, now that they must see their error, I must support them. They promised me that they would do Ireland justice ; if they attempt to retract I will force them to do jus tice." His purpose is then answered,. for the general cry will be, " Dan is honest after all—only for him we would get nothing—he deserves more than ever. So the rent will be multiplied. " Well, then," the Government will say, " we must conciliate the Irish people, i. e. the levellers ; We must withhold further support to the Protestant party, else we cannot govern the counrry." Thus they too carry their point ; O'Connell lends them his tail in the House of Commons; their majorities are swelled, and their places are secured. O'Connell, in his letter, says that the Protestants (in his phrase the Orangemen) have no substantial cause of complaint. The only grievances they will suffer are the loss of their influence, and the abolition of tithes—trifling grievances in his estimation to the Protestant interest in Ireland. But the Catholics, he says, have twenty-one solid causes of complaint. How ever he, for the present, only enumerates four; the rest he reserves for twenty or thirty other letters. The first was the appointment of Lord Plunkett to the Chancellorship. " Lord Grey'," says Dan, " did not deserve his station unless he was aware that there never lived a public man in Ireland so devoid of popularity as Lord Plunket. He had obtained rather than earned the hatred of all parties. There was something about him which made it impossible to place confidence in him. A Presbyterian in his days of .poverty, a Protestant as he grew in wealth, the advocate, and yet deemed the deadly foe, of the Catholics, his whole mind seemed con centrated in self. His cold repulsive manner, the sardonic sneer which ever played about his lips, marked him as a man without a friend—friendships he had none. The most efficient advocate the British empire ever produced, he had no reputa tion as a lawyer, and gave any thing but satisfaction as a Judge." The second grievance was the elevation of the late Attorney-General Joy to the office of Chief Baron. Mr. Joy's only crime was that he stood at the head of the Orange Bar. The third was making his deter mined, able, and successful Parliamentary antagonist, Mr. Doherty, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas; a man, he says, of moderate talents (he himself, how ever, found them formidable enough in the House of Commons), trivial success at the Bar, who would be flattered at being called a sixth-rate Barrister. He too was an enemy of the Whigs. But the master grievance of all was the appointment of the present Attorney-General, Mr. Blackburne, who, he says, began his career in 1806, by a speech of virulent op position to the Address of Congratulation from the Irish Bar to Lord Duncannon s relation, Chan cellor Ponsonby, and the celebrated Curran, on their elevation, and who has since continued an active member of the Kildare-place Association and the Bible and Tract Societies ; in a word, a bitter Anti-Catholic. Well may O'Connell feel mortified at Blackburne's continuance in his present office, for he has been in stern reality " a rock of offence and a stumbling-block" in his way. He is the only func tionary that ever patiently watched him, and traced him through his sinuosities, until he grappled with him at last, and laid him prostrate. His celebrated prose cution of Mr. O'Connell—the perseverance, tact, and resolution that he evinced on that occasion—will not be soon forgotten ? As a lawyer Mr. O'Connell was long thought by his friends invulnerable ; but Black burne hit their legal Achilles in the heel at last. It is said that O'Connell often forgets the friend who gives him a lift, but he was never accused of forgiving the enemy who " floored" him. " Hic fons nzalorum. This is the spring from which flows his complaint of the appointment of the Tory Blackburne to office as one of the crimes of the Whigs and the calamities of Ireland.—Morning Post. OLD BAILEY.-.-SEPT. 6. OLD COURT. In the cases of Thomas Goodwin, a letter-carried, aged 32, Benjamin Swabey, alias M'Sweeney, a clerk, and John Ward, a boot-closer, who were capitally indicted for steal ing a General-Post letter, containing three 5001. bank notes, and seven bills for 4,5001., the property of Messrs. Walker an d C o ., b an k ers, R ot h erham, and whose t r ial was not conclud e d on S a t ur d ay w h en our R eporter left, the Jury returned a verdict of Guilty against all three, but strongly recommending Ward to mercy. Joseph Ady was called on his recognizances to a nswer a charge of misdemeanour, but did not appear. Mr. BODKIN said that if the usual fee had been sent him he would have made his appearance.—(Laughter.) Henry Machin, a very respectable-looking man, was in dicted for embezzling a check for the payment of 8/. 15s. 6d. the property of Miss Harriet Dawson, his mistress. Ver diet—Guilty. WITNESSES TO CHARACTER.—One of the Jury stated that, in a trial which took place on Friday evening, one of the witnesses, who gave the prisoner a character, gave a name and address which he (the Juryman) at the time suspected to be false. He had since taken the trouble to make in quiry, and found that his suspicious were correct. . The RECORDER thanked the juryman for his information, and said that, whenever such a case was proved, the party offending would have a long residence in Newgate. THE LATE ROBBERY AT THE BAZAAR, AND THE FOR FEITURE OF RECOGNIZANCES.—It may be recollected that several months ago, a young lady, the member of a family of highly-respectable character, was detected in stealing some trifling articles from the Bazaar in Soho-square, when she was given into custody, arid conveyed before a Magis trate, who, in consequence of her station in life, suffered her to go at large upon recognizances being entered into in the sum of 801. to appear at the July Old Bailey Sessions, but she did riot come to take her trial. The Court then granted a warrant for the apprehension of the young lady, and estreated her recognizances. Mr. BODKIN now made an application to the Court that the recognizances of the witnesses might be discharged, as no blame rested with them ; and further, that they might be allowed their expenses. The Learned Gentleman moved upon the affidavit of the officer who was entrusted with the warrant, who swore that he had made diligent search and inquiry respecting the prisoner, but was unable to appre hend her, and that lie had heard and believed, that she had absconded from her home, and had emigrated to some country beyond the seas, and taken up her residence in order to evade justice. The Court granted the application. NEW COURT. Joseph Robinson was indicted for stealing a shilling and a handkerchief, the property of Peter Dunkley. The prosecutor, a harness• maker, deposed that he came from Leicester, and was at Uxbridge, looking for employment in August last ; witness had previously exchanged handerchiefs with prisoner's brother, and when going to his lodgings, he was stopped by the prisoner and three others : the prisoner said the handkerchief on witness's neck was his fathe r ' s , and that he should have it ; witness was th en knocked down and kicked, and the handkerchief which witness had taken off his neck and put in his pocket , was t aken fr om him, and also a shilling, which was in the same pocket. shilling The Learneddropped S E ac af from ir hisasked the pocket? Witness —.I t nw —I saw it in his hand. e s—... Might n o t th e Sergeant ARABIN--It is very extraordinary, then, that you did not state that important fact before the Magistrates. The Jury, under the direction of the Learned Sergeant, acquitted the prisoner. Julia Hayes, a young Irish girl, was indicted for stealing two silver spoons, the property of her master, Daniel Dunning. The prosecutor stated that the prisoner was a servant in his employment. On the 9th of July he missed two spoons. The police-officer stated that tho prisoner confessed she pawned them in Walnut -street, Clerkenwell. The spoons were found there, and the prosecutor identified them as his property. The prisoner received a very good character from two or three milkmen with whom she had lived, and who would take her into their employment again. The Jury returned a verdict of Guilty, with a recommenda tion to mercy. The Learned Sergeant said, in consequence of the good character she had received, and the Jury believing that it was her first offence, he would only sentence her to three weeks' imprisonment. An Irishwoman in the crowd exclaimed, "the Lord spare your Lordship long life." Mar; _Hennessy, and her daughter, Sarah Swash, were in dicted for stealing a watch, the property of Ellen Sullivan. The prosecut , ix deposed that she was a servant out of place. On the 24th July she had been drinkin g in a public-house in Whitechapel-road with the prisoners. They accompanied her home, and witness pulled out her watch and laid it on the chimney-piece. Mary Hennessy said that was right. She never saw it afterwards, and the prisoners denied all knowledge of it. The policeman who apprehended the prisoners said they told him they would pay for the watch if the prosecutrix would go no further with the matter.—Not guilty. The Learned Sergeant said they had had a very lucky escape, and cautioned them as to their future conduct. George Titewood was indicted for feloniously stealing 46 pair of boots, value 201., and 150 pair of shoes, value 30/., the property of his master, James Loyd, and James Titewood was indicted for receiving part of the property, knowing it to be stolen. The prosecutor deposed that the prisoner George was a shopman in his employment ; he keeps shoe warehouses at Nos. 25 and 30 Coventry-street ; the prisoner had been IS months in his employment, and suspecting that he was robbing him he set a man to watch him. Smyth, foreman to Mr. Lloyd, saw the prisoner George take a pair of shoes out of the shop and put them into his pocket; on the 28th of June he saw him take another pair and put them in his pocket ; he took them from him, and prisoner begged witness would not tell Mr. Lloyd. Policeman C, 179, searched the prisoner's lodgings, Wal nut Tree-walk, Lambeth-road, and found a pair of Blucher boots, a pair of shoes, and a pawnbroker's duplicate of another pair; he went round to 28 different pawnbroker's shops and found about 46 pair of boots, and 150 pair of shoes. William B. Pyett, shopman to Mr. Brydges, pawnbroker, Coles -street, Westminster-road, saw the prisoners frequently in his master's shop. They pledged boots and shoes four or five times, but he cannot point out any particular pair pawned by either one or the other prisoner. The four pair of shoes and the pair of boots produced were pawned by either one brother or the other, and they were identified by Mr. Lloyd. Edward Wood, another pawnbroker, produced five pair of boots, pledged with him, but he does not know by whom. William Roberts, shopman to Mr. Archbold, pawnbroker, 20, Bridge-road, Lambeth, produced the duplicates of twenty pair of shoes pledged by James Fleetwood. The shoes were given up at Marlborough -street to Mr. Lloyd. The shopman to Mr. Vaughan, pawnbroker, 39, Strand, deposed that the prisoner James pledged four or five pair of boots with him. He at last became suspicious, and when the prisoner brought a pair of boots, witness said he suspected they were not his own. Prisoner said he was a shoemaker, and would fetch his card. He went off and left the boots with witness, but never came back. Two other pawnbrokers produced boots and shoes, but could not say by whom they wore pledged. James Oliver, apprentice to Mr. Lloyd, proved that a pair of boots produced by Mr. Brydges' shopman, as pledged by one of the prisoners, were marked by him. The prosecutor was again re-examined as to his identity of the shoes and boots, and a great deal of confusion took place from the large quantity of boots and shoes produced. Mr. Serjeant ARABIN said it was very unfortunate that the prosecutor did not employ counsel to conduct what was evidently a very intricate case. Benjamin Bowen, attorney's clerk, Hudson, a shoemaker, John Garth, of Red Lion-square, and John Bradley, parish officer, gave the prisoner a very good character. The Learned SERJEANT in summing up, said be was sure the Jury would regret equally with himself that the prosecutor had not procured legal assistance, by which the case would have been much simplified, and much of the public time saved. The Jury after deliberating for a few minutes returned a verdict of Guilty against both the prisoners. Susannah Titewood, wife to James, who appeared at the bar with an infant in her arms, was then indicted for receiving three pair of shoes, the property of Mr. Lloyd, knowing them to be stolen. In her defence the prisoner said she had got the shoes from her husband. _...Not guilty. The Learned Serjeant said he had never seen such whole sale plunder of a master, and the prisoners should take the con sequences. The property, which amounted to more than 200 pair of boots and shoes, was then ordered to be given up to Mr. Lloyd. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HOUSE. Saturday a flying piemen complained to the LORD MAYOR that one of the police officers seized his " round-about," on which he used to support the tin machinery with which he kept his pies hot, lie (the pieman) had been all his life engaged in disposing of mutton pies at Bartholomew Fair, and there had never been any attempt made before to offer him an insult. The LORD MAYOR, who seemed to be perfectly awake to the games of St. Bartholomew, asked whether the round about was applied to any other uses—whether it was not, in fact, rather a machine for trying people's luck upon ? The pieman replied that it was quite an innocent sort of business, and his customers profited by it, for they often ob tained a penny pie for a halfpenny when the hand to the right place. The policeman said that it was as regular a gambling con cern as Crockford's, and the customers had no chance, for the pieman had a bit of a spring under the handle of it, and Just as the handle would be going to stop upon the prize he'd give it a sort of a twist, and away went the halfpenny into his pocket. Sometimes he'd allow a person to win to make it appear that he was honest ; but then it was only once out of a dozen times. The P *Cman --- cleniedThe truth of the accusation. He didn't care i himself about trying the game. In fact, he'd rather sell his pies at full price than run the hazard of half, but Bartholomew Fair would be nothing without it. The LORD MAYOR hoped that the meat in the pies was unexceptionable, for he had heard some disagreeable stories about the general contents ; indeed they were often com posed of animals of the most domestic habits.—(A laugh.) ...... . _ , The pieman declared that he dealt with the very highest butchers, and he was willing to do what very few piemen could d o . He would cat any pie in his basket himself.— (Laughter.) The officer could not believe any thing of the kind. He thought that the pies were all a blind, and that the round about turned inside out the pockets of many an adventurous countryman. An elderly gentleman, who was in his early days in the butchering line, had known the flying piemen to go about the lanes and alleys at fair-time in search of what formed afterwards the principal ingredient in their pies. He never knew a butcher who sold meat to one of them, and he therefore believed that they must be in the habit of killing their own mutton upon the tiles. For his own part, al though he had been a butcher for thirty years, he could not tell the difference between a cat and a dog when cooked, and therefore he could give no opinion as to the merits of the Bartholomew pies. ---(Laughter.) The officer had heard of many complaints of the loss of fat dogs. It appeared that those who stole them did not care about the breed or kind of animal they sacrificed, so that they were plump, there being a strong feeling in favour of the fat in those delicacies. Mr. Hobler remembered several years ago, that a soldier had been placed at the bar of the Mansion-house, for at tempting to stab a pieman. It appeared that the soldier had purchased a pie, and had eaten about half of it, when he found that there was not a morsel of fat in it. He ran after the pieman, and expostulated with him. " Oh," said th e pieman, who was a very facetious person, how can I help that ; the poor animal was yowling and barking at my door last night from mere starvation, and it would have cost me ss. to put him in condition, so I hung him on the spot ?" --(Great laughter.) The pieman, however, nearly lost his life by the joke. The LORD MAYOR, under the circumstances, thought he should order the roundabout to be burned, as he did not doubt of the general use to which it was a ppli e d. It par took, in his opinion, of the character of the " thimble rig" and " prick in the loop," and those other games by which the inexperienced were imposed upon. MARLBORO UGH-STREET. Jeremiah Kelland, an elderly khight of the needle and s hears, brought Patrick Langhan, a genuine Dublin jackeen, with his chin buried in huge grass-green stock, before Messrs. CHAMBERS and DYER, for having jointly, with his mother, Norah Langhan, committed assault and battery on him on Thursday last. Th e complainant began—Plate your honour, Paddy Langhan's dog—that's the defindant's I mane, ran bang at the leg of me, and whin I riz my fut to kick the ugly baste, out bounces Paddy Langhan, my lodger, wid the poker ready to devour me. Mr. DYER—Which was to devour you, your lodger or the dog ? Complainant—lt was Paddy Langhan, be vartue of me oath. Mistress Norah, plase yer Wertchip, hearing the shindy, came to the dure wid something wet in a quart pot, and smothered m e i nt i re l y, and that ' s t h e bl esse d t r ut. Mr. CHAMBERS—Wen, Mrs. Norah, what have you to say to the charge ?—" Thin, if I get liberty to spake," said Mrs. Norah, " Mishter Kelland was bating the life out of me boy, whin I wint to save him, and as I was just stifling the bugs in one room wid a little hot warter,_l wint out wid the pot in the hand of me, an d t rue a littl e dhrop of durty warther went over Misther Kelland. Mr. CHAMBERS—How did you contrive to stifle the bugs ? Mrs. Norah—Why I tuk a pail full of hot war ther, and wid the pot chucked it over the walls and the flure, by which manes the bast es were s tifl e d. The MAGISTRATES, finding the assault was of a very trivial character, and that the parties were lodgers in the same house, recommended them to retire and try to adjust the matter amicably, especially as they both came from the same country. " No, be the oath of me," said Mrs. Norah, " we're not countrymen at all at all—for Mishter Kelland comes from durty Connaught, and I coma from beautiful Munsther." As the matter could not be settled in a friendly way, the MAGISTRATES consented to discharge the warrant upon the defendants undertaking to quit their lodgings in a week, and to pay the costs. Ja - nzes Collins, an elderly man, in the garb of a sailor, was brought before Mr. CHAMBERS, charged with having collected various sums of money from different ladies and gentlemen under fraudulent pretences. The prisoner was taken into custody in consequence of information given at this office that some person was going about town collecting contributions for distressed seamen, by making unsanctioned use of the name of the Rev. Mr. Ellarby, the very respect able Minister of Percy -street Chapel, Charlotte-street, Fitzroy-square. The prisoner was committed for the full period of three months. WORSHIP-STREET On Saturday Mr. Hancock, proprietor of the " Antop sey" steam-carriage, attended before the presiding Magis trates, Messrs. BROUGHTON and TWYFORD, to answer the complaint of a tradesman named Samuel Mayne Powell, residing in Globe-road, Bethnal-green. The complainant, on Friday week last, was proceeding along the City-road with a caravan and a pair of horses. The caravan contained several persons who were going on an excursion of pleasure to Hampton-Court. Com plainant had passed the steam-carriage station in the City-road ; and just as he had got on the canal bridge he heard Mr. Knight, a gentleman in the van, call out to him to make way, as the steam-carriage was coming up. Complainant was on the near side, within two feet of the curb, and he drew up as much closer as possible. An omnibus was on the off side, and another was coming up, but it stopped to afford an op portunity for the steam-carriage to pass ; there was plenty of room for two omnibusses to pass on the offside of Com plainant's van. Mr. Hancock, the Defendant, who was steering, run behind him for some little distance, and on passing caught the side of the van, and injured the harness, and the forewheel of the steam carriage went over the horse's foot. On the carriage running against the van the concussion was tremendous, and had it caught the wheel of the van it must have overturned it. There was a laugh in the carriage ; and some person in it said, " Go on, it's only a vanload of rubbish." Complainant said that Dlr. Han cock must have steered wrong, either from accident or in tention, for even had he kept straight on, the wheel could not have passed over the horse. Complainant repeated that there was ample room for the defendant to have passed, as four carriages might pass abreast. The Magistrates could not hesitate in coming to a con clusion that the Plaintiff had been injured. On referring, however, to the Stage-coach Act, it was discovered that steam-carriages were especially exempt from the operation of the Act. Mr. Broughton asked Mr. Hancock if he was aware of that exception ?—Mr. Hancock said that when that Act was before the Committee, there was a clause in it specially appertaining to steam-carriages, but by the representations of Mr. Ray, a cabriolet proprietor, it had been struck out. On referring to the Hackney-coach Act the penalty of negligence attached only to drivers of carriages, which the Magistrates could not consider applied to the present case. Mr. BROUGHTON was extremely sorry that Mr. Hancock had ever let the case come before a public tribunal. The complainant had called on Mr. Hancock, and asked him to make some compensation, but he rudely told him to leave his place. MT. BROUGHTON said it was extraordinary that the steam carriage was expressly exempted, or he would have given the complainant .5/. damages and costs, but as it was he had no jurisdiction, although he certainly considered there was a degree of carelessness, and as the acts were framed there was no provision for damages, and the public were without protection ; the only remedy was by action. Mr. Hancock had such frequent claims made upon him that he could not answer all. Mr. BROUGHTON directed Graves, one of the officers of the establishment, to conduct the parties into the magis trates' private room, so that they might have another op portunity to effect an amicable arrangement, which they ultimately succeeded in doing, and then withdrew. Q UEEN- SQUARE. Thomas Baker was brought up in custody and placed at the bar before Messrs. GREGORIE and BURRELL, charged with assaulting James Bedford, a workman in the employ of Mr. Thomas Cubitt, under the following circumstances : A solicitor, on behalf of the complainant, stated that although the case was only one of a common assault, yet it was of considerable importance on account of the intimi dating and threatening language of the members of the Trades' Unions towards the men in Mr. Thomas Cubitt's employ ; it had arrived at such a pitch that the men were in danger of their lives. The complainant had been in Mr. Cubitt's employ about thirteen Years. On Friday afternoon he was at work in a brickfield near the Belgrave-road, Pimlico ; the prisoner and a number of other men came into the field and abused him, calling him all manner of names for signing the mas ters' document ; a boy there attempted to strike com plainant, and he seized him by the collar to prevent him, when the prisoner came up, struck him a violent blow on the face, and knocked him down ; when he got up the pri soner struck him several other blows, and witness went away and got a police constable, who took him into custody. J. Walsh, another workman in Mr. Cubitt's employ, cor roborated the above evidence. The prisoner, in reply, admitted that he struck the com plainant, but he struck him first. A witness for the defence could not say who struck first. The Magistrates, having consulted together, said that they would mitigate the fine to 31., and if this was not paid, he would be committed for two months to the House of Correction. The prisoner was then locked up. One of Mr. Cubitt's men here applied to the Magistrates for protection against the men belonging to the Trades' Union. They were afraid to go about their work from the threats held out to them. Only on Friday he was abused, and pelted with brickbats because he was at work. Mr. GREGOIUE told him if he would point out any of the leaders he should have a warrant against them instantly ; such a state of things ought to be immediately put a stop to. HATTON-GARDEN. Just after Mr. Sergeant SELLON had taken his seat on the bench, Mr. Inspector Titterton, of E division, entered the office, and gave information of the following supposed murder, which was committed on Friday night last. On Friday night last a boy in the service of Mr. Boon, solicitor, of No. 35, Keppel-street, Russell-square, had occasion to go into the garden, when he discovered some thing lying on the gravel-walk, and on approaching the spot he found it to be the body of a child covered Fith blood. He immediately returned to the house and informed his master of the circumstance, and he instantly called in a police constable, Stannard, 56 E division, who wrapped the body of the infant up and carried it to the station-house in George-street, St. Giles's, where, on examining the body, it was found to be literally dashed to pieces. Inspector Lin coln, who was on duty, ordered the constable to take the body of the child to the workhouse, and, feeling satisfied that murder had been committed, he also directed Stannard and Sergeant Payne to proceed to the spot, and use the utmost exertions to discover the perpetrator: Inspector Titterton immediately proceeded to make inquiry, and on ascertaining that the body of the child was found in the garden belonging to Mr. Boon's house, he called at that gentleman's house, when the family were all in bed, the time being near 1 o'clock in the morning. He informed Mr. Boon the nature of his visit, on which he was imme diately admitted to the house, and the two servants were called out of bed, but there was no appearance in them indica tive of their being the murderers. He then proceeded to the garden, where he found a quantity of blood, and on examining the ground and garden-wall with a light he plainly traced the marks of human blood from the spot on which the deceased child was found to the house of Mrs. Stukey, a widow lady, residing at No. 36, Keppel-street, and he in stantly suspected that the murderers of the child must be in the house, and he repaired thither with haste and knocked at the door, which was opened, and he inquired for Mrs. Stukey, who had been entertaining her brother and a party of ladies and gentlemen on that evening. The appearance of the Inspector at that hour of the morning created the utmost alarm and confusion, and he mentioned as deli cately as possible to Mrs. Stukey and her brother the na ture of the mission upon which he entered. Mrs. Stukey and the whole of the party were struck with amazement, said that it was impossible that any person in her house could have committed the crime. Mr. Titterton, however, begged to see her two female servants, who were at the time in bed, and they were called up. One of them came down, and the Inspector felt satisfied that she was not the delinquent. Shortly afterwards another of the servants, named Harriet Chalice, was called down ; her counte nance was ghastly, she trembled, and her general demea nour bespoke guilt. She affected to be in a great passion, and quite indignant at being disturbed by a " set of common policemen," and said she would answer none of their ques tions. Whilst thus engaged Mr. Titterton perceived that her hands and apparel were covered with blood, and he told her to compose herself, and then requested Mrs. Stukey, her brother, and the ladies, to step into the parlour, when he communicated to them what he had seen, and she was in stantly brought before them and examined, when her hands were found stained, but on being questioned she replied that the appearances were naturally caused. Dr. Dixon, —....--. • of Russell-square, was procured, and on examining the. ge" vant he gav e it as hi s d ec id e d o pinion that she - bad. ei delivered of a c hild a s h or t ti me b e f or e. She maintain a the utmost calmness during the whole of the time, AF,,„ after the e xam i na ti on s h e ran up stairs in the mo st ag ' u manner possible, an d wen t t o bed. Mr. Titterton then quitted the ho use , l eav i ng h er un d er th e c ustody of one of his constables during th e morn i ng . I n the course of the morning she evinced the greatest remorse and conaPutle tion, was dreadfully restless, and her eyes sunk into her her head, when she begged t o h ave an interview with mistress. Stannerd immediat e ly intimated her wish, wbbene the desired interview took place, and she confessed that, $l .l had delivered herself of the child, and in order to avoid de had she came from her bedroom on the fourth.storPT proceeded to the third-floor apartment, and threw,the fent from the window over the wall into Mr. Boon's ga rda l After her confession she became exceedingly ill; an d . stia .. into complete exhaustion, and she i s now lying at the hatl'" of her mistress without the least hope of recovery.. 0 Mr. Sergeant SELLON inquired whether the child if t it born alive ? Inspector Titterton said it was, and tha was quite warm when it was at the station-house. i ll the Mr. Sergeant SELLON—How long has she been service ? Inspector Titterton—Six months. f or . Mr. Sergeant SELLON—Then she is unable to No e ward ? Inspector Titterton—She is, your Worship. 0 , Mr. Sergeant SELLON said that she ought to be kePt 1 . 1 der the care of an officer; and ordered that info rm ,„s ta should be instantly forwarded to Mr. Stirling, the Cod ner, in order that an inquest might be held upon th e b° 1; Nichols, the beadle, accordingly forwarded inte lli g en tl y to the Coroner, and an inquest will be held on th e b° this This circumstance has excited a most extraordinal laa : sation throughout the neighbourhood, and the utmost riosity has been manifested by crowds of persons ich°, oo sembled on the spot during the whole of the day ea' mother of the child is about twenty years of age, an d tered the service with a good recommendation from a 0 1- try situation. MARYLEBONE. Mr. Conge, the French confectioner of Regent was was charged with keeping a large ferocious dog, which seriously injured a little girl about five years old. t, Mr. Dinneford, a surgeon, of No. 172, New Bond-stre on Wednesday last was walking up Regent-street wi th 14 .. r; James Anderson, when lie saw the defendant's dog rush ( 1 6 of his shop and attack a group of children. The bru he r fastened upon one of the children, and, having throWnrisi down, was proceeding to worry her, but he succeed %; driving the dog away by repeated blows of his unihr e e he then directed a police constable to summon the delta ant. Mr. Dinneford said that a few weeks back he been called upon to cauterize the leg of Lord Wudefeep who, while riding on horseback in Hyde Park, ba d f ve tis attacked by a dog of a similar description ; a friend tac k had also been thrown from his horse by the sudden e" - t y of a dog. Mr. D. then went on to state that the an and fright caused by a bite from a dog, though not ra.,th.l was sufficient at present to produce the most fatal e°' -- quences. '!'he Magistrate gave orders to the policeman to delt 4 the dog. t° Policeman (hesitating)—l don't know how to do it. W Mr. hit° Dinneford—Bring him to me and I'll soon 0 °- with a dose of prussic acid. The policeman gladly availed himself of the offer. 09 The magistrates, Messrs. Hosnws and SHUT T ; ° of occupied for several hours in investigating the condoler Morrison the gaoler, and Webster, an officer, wh° 6e , mot ligence was alleged to have been one c ause of the ad, g— je. an elderly female named Walker. The deceased , r A t s fault of finding bail for an assault, was taken handca ue ;ol prison, where she was seized with cholera, of which s he the following day. Mr. Jordan said that he and the husband of th e ,,, re s ceased attended with bail, at twenty minutes before P' for o'clock, and told Morrison, who was in the outer 0 6ce 0ut e what purpose they had come. He made no reply. b ut h a ve time after said, " You're too late, the Magistrates her gone," to which he added, " the locking up will d° ifice good." Mr. Jordan said the magistrates were in the ° when he first spoke to the officers. nisi Webster said that he referred the parties to at which time the Magistrates were on the point er 1 ` - the Morrison denied the brutal expression imputed to Do and said that when the bail told him they were regal' went into the office, but the magistrates had gone. te r The Magistrates said there had certainly been 0 0 I s ar tional negligence, although there had been great car e , ness, which they hoped would not occur again. , t o Mr. Jordan said the deceased's friends would app l y Member of Parliament on the subject. TOWN-HALL. In the course of the day a sweep entered the office' An d complained that the police had threatened to get hiln 40s. if he cried " sweep" in the streets. Ac t On the applicant being told that it was against the of Parliament, he said—" Vell, vat am Itodo ? ° le o my missus at home with three young children a-O e foct and I can't yarn nothing for them ; but I'll floor the is fp of Parliament. I'll take the apprentices and kids with and call out Lord have mercy on us,' and then the ge ° folks will ah about me, and give us their jobs. 0 1/ 0 The sweep was informed that prayer -brawling ly"" illegal. 00 ; Sweep—Then I'll say, " Laws have mercy o n there's no religion in that. wit h H 'shed - ' ,naPaPY $6 __e then brushet., into the street, and, in eml. his apprentices, acted according to his declaration., 00 afterwards informed the officers that the scheme 1 10 1 4 0 0 ceeded, and that he had three chimneys to sweep on day morning. ooe" The followingorder has been issued by the ComlniPli tb• of Police :—" The person in charge of the prisoner s : O ut station-house is n o t, a t an y ti me , t o v i s it them wi t ' n second person being pr esen t ; an d, a ft er th e y have th e Ile sited, the keys are to be re t urne d i n t o th e h an ds of • Spector, and, when wanted afterwards, to be asked lb' WESTMINSTER SESSIONS, SErl.. ji Mr. C. Wilson, a law student, residing in the no licr j was indicted for assaulting Adam Booth, a tlle" ~ 10" officer, in the execution of his duty. The proseeu t 4 been discharged from the force for the part vo l- s slie enacted in this very transaction, and he now had the COre ranee, aided by two or three Irishmen of the same al` to attempt to make out a serious charge of assault oP Mr. Wilkins, who, it seemed, had interfered to ju t 13 to some of the practices of the prosecutor. The Jury acquitted Mr. Wilkins, and the Chair ri llfs i signated the prosecution as a conspiracy, and said h p tb s not surprised that Booth had been dischargod in% sl O police forth ; he only wondered th a t o th ers were n° dismissed. HAMBURG, SEPT. 2.—Th e D u t c h si..P :be line, with the young P r i nce on b oar d, sa il e d f rom COP on the 28th. BIRTHS. J inst., I A, Pt' V" On the 2d at Ballincollig, the lady of T. W. .-- en ii. 4th Royal Irish Dragoon Guards, of a son. Oh V. On the 4th inst., at Wi n d sor , th e l a d y o f C o l one l Bli' r° of stream Guards, of a son. Mgerit On the sth inst., in Devonshire-place, Mrs. William a son. _,1,, oICAr On the sth inst., at Croorn's Hill, Greenwich, the lam. , c e Isacke, of a son. f G r :le. On the 4th inst., the lady o f Th omas Wilkinson, Ella , CO place, Hackney, of a d aug ht er . O n t h e same day w s. di Platt Stennett, the inf an t son o f t h e a b ove, aged 15 riOntopt On the sth inst., i n Eaton-place, Mrs. George Carr ~or daughter. 11°P' On the 29th ult., the lady of the Rev. William Cram er of a son and h e i r . -.... MARRIAGES. 14 4 O ft On the 4th inst., at St. Mary Magdalen, Canterbury' 1 1 1 49 Hodges, Esq., late Captain 7th Dragoon Guards, t ° daughter of the late Joseph Rodgers, Esq., of Tottenhols: /111: 0 4 On the 28th u lt., a t C amp hill, Gl asgow , the ' l t ft sr o Henry White Lichfield, to Christina, daughter of the o' Thomson, Esq., of Camphill. va ol oti On the 3d inst., at Eltham, Li eu t. E. F. Grant, .„i', - 'er,' Artillery, to Ma r y, s ec on d d aug ht er o f th e l a t e J ose ph " 1 " - of Southend, Eltham. rrizo'no On the 4th inst., at St. Marylebone Church, E. Jo Esq., Captain in his Majesty's 13th Light InfantrY,:pow second daughter of Henry Wylie, Esq., Somerset-st et ' cis square. On the Ist inst., George Glass, of Salisbury, to Su esztesll ,o* ment, of the same place. - i een'Tl;eskt° On the 30th ult., at St. Ge orge -th e -M a rtyr, or teg Francisco Vizeu Pinheiro, E sq ., o f Th oma r, nt a pur s , Frances, fifth daughter of Joh n Sh earman , Esq., a " jsr Bloomsbury. On the sth inst., at St. Matthew's, Bethnal-gre,°?, VQ Pinkney, of Ipswich, to Maria, widow of the late Niri" is ton Cavendish, of Calcutta. , nit tit DEATHS. ' l6- 0 01.1" On the 29th tilt., at the Chateau de Bardelle, neroost L er, L'Amaury, France, the Hon. Anna de Mallet, wif e f o htee General the Baron de Mallet, and eldest surviving us r late Robert Viscou n t M o l eswort h. Hen ry O On the 2d inst., at Great Gaddesden Hooe, Herts, Esq. O agedn the 27th ult., at the Rectory, Terrington , infant daughter of the Rev. Charles Hall. On the 28th ult., at Tunbridge Wells, Honors gr i btoYs co i l sOs wife of the Rev. E. Poring Henslowe, Chaplain °f Lllant giment of Artillery, an d e ld est ( l aug h ter o f the late 101 Vassal]. o On the Ist inst., Ann, wife of Charles Vitre , gate-street, Winchester. Jima, On the 30th of July, at Coblentz, in Germany' Lieut.-Colonel the Hon. Henry Edward Butler. 0 a, „ y 1 London : Printed a n d P u bli s h e d by 1111.JRDv d. at ne Sun Office, No. 112, Steal/