The Sun. — London, England, 1815-03-18 00:00:00

1 ; : ... i' raw)) ty. •No •ti).:) . P. ilrxt lionse !ex - et •s\iptiorteri it Gil any "other principle. It was certainly, be would repeat, a sacred obligation on the noose to attend with the utmost respect to the Petitions•of ail his Majesty's subjects, but then they conid not 'carry that attention to the re presentations of any branch of hi , :qajesty's sub;-, it. , cts 'to ;in extent, as to interfere with that which :le t s due to the lather. There went onte interests of a peCaiiar not twe'which could not be attended to ;a the first instance. Upon that principle it that no Petitions were received against Tax RN, except nadir certain limitations. He be iteVed that his Noble Friend came forward on the trotives of his own judgment. So he sincerely believed, did every man in the House. The sim ple question was, , whether according to the rules ui the House, they could, hear Counsel on such a petition as that from the City of London, against the Bill; and conformably to the practice of the House, and the principle of its rules ? Rules, which were founded in the essence and the safety of the Constitution of England. They must, on such occasions as the present, hold out the same rule to one that they did to "all. It was also wor thy-of consideratioo, that the Petitions for the 1, ill were nearly as 'omicrons as those against it, though certainly not so numerously signed. Un der such circumstances, a single Petition comes, desiring to he heard by Counsel against a general measure affecting- ail his Majesty's subjects. But in such a case, with all due respect to the City t)t LoMlon, he would ask, how could they hear Counsel and evidence en that, and refuse to hear upon the Petition from . the City of lit istol, the town and pent of Liverpool, the great ma pufactnring towns of Manchester and Birming ham, as well as • many others ? This was not a general measure affecting, in particular, the interests of individuals, but affecting all his Majesty's subjects. Neither were their Lord ships to proceed upon the views of the Petition ers, but upon - their own views of, and judgment upon the subjects. With respect to precedents, be did not think there would be found-a single in stance to authorise what was now called for, but, it would he for their Lordships to decide, whe ther in thishe, who may in one sense call himself their servant, was right or not. According to the role and practice of Parliament, he devilled it utterly impossible that they could comply with the prayer of a petition so proceeding, and under, such circemstances. In their rule of equal justice ail& equal attention; they could no more pay at tention to tile most distinguished Corporation than to the humblest individual. Upon these princi ples their Lordships decision in this case should proceed, and they should adhere'to the dictates of that lex et consuetudo Parliamenii, of which they bad so long experienced the benefits, and which formed one of the hest supports of the Law and Coastitution olthis country. Lord GREY spoke in favour of the motion, and observed, that the Corporation of the City of Lon don were interested in the Measure in a threefold capacity ; us consumers, as interested in the ma nufactures end commerce of the country, and as being the Corporition of the Metropolis. As to the first and last points, it was unnecessary to dwell on them ; and on the second; it was almost equz.lly tinnecess7iry.. The Corporation of the City of London, it tv..11 known were almost all commercial men. But if She Manufacturers of this country were not able to contend with the Manufactures of surrounding Nations in the fo reign market, there was an end to this country's commerce ; aud it the present Corn Bill passed, this would be the case. This the Pe:itioners had* hilly stated in their Petition. They were there fore, according to the strict roles of the House, entitled to be heard. The only question that could be on this point was, whether the question. was of sufficieut importance. But could any one pretend to deny this ? Who could doubt that what materially concerned the first necessary was of the utmost importance The doors of the louse °light not lobe shut to Petitions. But of iv :it use was Petition, if it ‘vai not attended to ? Of the right of Petition he would sae what the Poet said of Mercy—" It blessed) him that gives, and hint that takes."-11 the House were not de termined to shut the door on Petitions', there was no reason why they should not attend to the pr tyer of this Petition. Ile concluded by supportin ;the motion Lord LIVZRPOOL said, that the question was nilt, whet her the Petition of the City of London car of any other place, should be received ; but whether the prayer of it should be granted ? Uu the general principle Of legiAation, every indivi thnd had as good it 'right as any corporation to have•the prayer of his Petitio n at t e nd e d to. Pant when their 'Lordships had laid down a generai rule, they could not consistently depart from it in a particular instance. Tlwir Lordships had on their table two reports orthe Commons, anti one of the Lords on it. Had not the-city of London an opportunity of stating any information they had On the subject during those three Sessions? The House had Petitions last Sessions as.well as this ; and the Committee came . to a resolution, that the Petitioners Rid not support any of their alle;- .gations ; and that they were prepared to receive sang information Gn the subject. The City of London, therefore, had as well as every other place Jut opportunity-of giving every information it wished to communicate to the Committee ; and it it neglected doing •,.() fOr so long a time, Why should it tune apply for a particular occasion (41 the tpie,tiola of wliat was the price of the quarters loaf, comparatively with the price of Wheat, thery had the Intl evidence, evidence of the City of London itself. lie was sure that the City -of Loudon scould;;ive no new information of k.ny importicnce on the subject; and he should therefore oppose -the motion. Lord Jo a is: said, that the cott»try was, in teati ld ren d er it unwise to Stich circtintsta;icei ass t) into the subject. There tras an impossibility on the part of all men to go G;rl under the present eireannstitoce. '1 he shopkeeper, the farmer, the manufacturer, fill found au equal stog»ation. I' he • petitioner l h a d last year had : 41:1 e-ttin;t” of Statingauk information , they porasessed, and they tlid not avail thernsetvei of it, 'f.itt - ; w they come -forward, when tire opportunity it."s did not think they had any fair clru.n to ask for an opportunity, which they had so .I ong neglected. 4,r4c Noble Lord who Lad brought forward the mot'iort; said itral tliie whoie Sytteni 4,f piol - C . Ct;Ol - Cs was founded on error. But what else had brought this country to such a state of prosperity? Great Britain Was'not meant by nature for that great ness to which she had attained. It was het Con stitution and her Wise regulations had carried her to such a pitch of elevation. Ile then went into a general detail of the nill and the history of the Corn Laws ; and concluded by givin; the mea sure his wannest approbation. Lord GREY explained. Lord HARDWICK corrected a mistatemcnt of what he had stated respecting the evidence of one of the witnesses. Lord SELKIRK said, that without the measure he thought it impossible to continue the cultiva tion of a great quantity of the poorer lands. What the quantity would be it was unnecessary to men tion, hut• a large quantity it would certainly be. It would probably cause a defalcation of a fourth or fifth part of the produce of the country, and no importation could make up for this difference. The largest importation ever known did not make • more than four or five weeks consumption for the kingdom ; and if there was a fourth or fifth part of the produce of the country was (deficient, what Would be the consequence ? This would not be fully the case this ye,r but next year he was sure it would happen. In two year, hence, then, what would be - the price ? Lord STANHOPE ruse to order. The Loan CHANC E LLOR said, that if the Noble Lord had tviihed to keep the House strictly to order, he should have interposed our i►ours ago. Lord SELKIRK continued to insist rin the defal cation in the pr►►duce; that wteuld arise froth the want of 'some such protection as the Bill pro nosed to the former. Lord DArm.mY_supported the motion. . Lord ERSKINE opposed it On grounds similar to those urged by the Lord Chancellor. Lord GREsymtz : brietly replied ; U , hen the House divided, and the numbers were— Not conteots 59 Cutitcots Alajority against Lord Grenville's motion —lB CORN 13ILL. The House then %vent into a Committee on the Coro Bill, when Lord GREY said, no evidence what ercr had been adduced to slim that M. %vas pccessary price for the protection of the fanner. 1 F they were . to take the evideuce as it then stood, it rested upon the supposition of charges continuing the same.— He thought that 703, or 725. would be sufficient ; and proposed to substitute that price. Lord LAUDERDALE asked, in what situation the agriculturists stood.. Their distresses required the most prompt consideration ; and if the present measure had been adopted!last year, the labourers would enjoy the same wages they had formerly • received, and tvould not be involved in inkfort ol , e ; There s'as no person who had given evidence be fore their Lordships, with the exception of Mr. Banks, who did not consider the price of 80s. as necessary for the protection of the farmer. Lord GREY observed, th a t all the witnesqes had given their opinion with reference to the then existing state of circumstances; but it ought to be %hewn by the advocates of tl►e measure, that it was necessary at the present moment to h 80s. as an excluding price. He thought that a lower price would be a sufficient protection t 6 the farmer. Lord IhnowlcKE had not heard any thing to induce him to alter his frier opinions; he did not consider it necessary that the price shoidd be fixed at 80e. and would give his vote for 70s. or ;2s. The question was then put, whether the words SOs. should be' omitted, and 70s. or 725. substi tuted in their place. The House decided tor. the original.words,.,without a division. Lord GRENVILLE tLien proposed a clause, that whenever for six successive weeks the price of the quarteru loaf should be above I:2A. it should be lawful for the next six weeks to import Corn for home consumption, or to take it out Of the warehouses for Qe same purpose:" tle said that 12d. should be the price at which Corn should be imported in the port of London ; and he confined it to London, because in that port alone facilities exist e d for ascertaining the average price. Lord Iliaßolvity thought it extremely wrong to suffer the whole country to be regulated by the price of the London market ; and contended, that it was upon the price in the maritinte dis trierS that the average should be regulated. Front the pryers before the House, it was Marne to say, that when the price of Corn was 80s. the quarters loaf would be sixteen pence; for, during 14 years, when the price of Corn was 88s. SCI. th e price of bread was fonreen 7 pence halfpenny. Lord GIITWILLE was no advocate for airy ar tificial system of regulating the price of corn, and titular:lined that the standard of corn alone vi . as tto _cyiterion, for the price of bread. All he desired, was, that if by accident the consumer should stif fer by the errors of the supporters of the Bill, the operation of the law should cease : he only wish ed that that might be adopted which would pre vent the law from doing that which they them -selves desired it might not. Lord HAREOWBY explained. Lord LAUDERDALE opposed the clause. The Marquis of BUCKINGHAM adopted, it wish ing to bring the principles of the supporters of the Bill to a test. Lord 'DARNLEY said a few words in support of the anise. Lord GRENVILLE briefly replied, stating, that he did not prop:ise by this clause to alter any part of the provisions of the Bill, and submitting, that it ought to'be adopted. Lord DARNLEY explained. Loi d STANHOPE said, that the Noble Lord (Grenville) had caught the noble Scotchinan (Lauderdale) coMpletely in. a trap: : The noble Scotchman had declared, " we won't have your clause', because it is improper to have any thing to do with flour :" but the clause did not say. a word about flour ; whence it was evid en t, t h at they did not know the diflerencehetwe cn flour and bread, and only tried to throw dust in their Lord. ships!- eyes. The clause was then rejected without a division, and the Bill was ordered to be read a third ti in on Monday next.—Adjourned. "` ,• • ~-•, ' ~,' sti: , t .... . , . . iiliii'l . . - re. illAt wii.h ili . - 'kprz tri , for ci'ecitr,o the -',• 0,4 and annual char:tes, stlcli ai , Vete 1111 W pai)re t i ,l'o f ;i: L, A retitiop I'va; I,. , ,,kfitei(i Irroin Titistort atz - ainst anv Altera- o""tr.e b" 4l dclui: Paid Lltire itimiey Sint e th e ' 3- 1 hr° it rit"tion Lail lnini..i.til all cunt fiann the rlNtlin„ tti3n 1 14 : , 7 0, thin in the Corn Laws. The Nlalta,'Pralie iiol was reail a thirel ilic,ii/c4 bet w'ecil t Fe per:od of the last riewCtiini4;i 2 " z ''' ' time, auk] passed. • • ( 't e st the .11;•.trictinl .ket ►,pasett. • ~,,raec ommirrEE OF stl gs's. - "t , ,..01 i . „i- lie 1 ,, , ,- -..- 0 _,. - f- ',..',, \v L' ' : , The liiniSit bavtaiL; restilvetl itelf into ii CeMaiittee cif • .-..' ' ' ' a • " 4 ' "" 4 "' ens u " cel " c- 1. " • • 'en''' . 4C)44"1- I" f)tying Hic revi 011 paqiitg- the Ptiidly,.. l " ( t et lip ~ • -2.),0061. litr payin.• Ilia 4:iveus,i of - OM EstAt.disato‘ th . c Noval Naval A.44at a . Mr. AttnuiliS'oT .prOposed a 'firittiy of Itesolii ,c' at tions, among whi'cli were : Air. ViliTilltEAD aln;eried tliAt this inslitution v:a , ~,,• A t iirSt . titil eta Ary, and then taken up by CioVerninent• '',. i ' os, 19;7771. for defraying the IntereFA. of Debentorts giren id , the a -, •itc., hh found ;lOW, a year for the Auditor lieu of F.xcliegiter Bills. 5a,1861. for paying. oft and discharging certain I)L.l.leatu r s . "'"r. , " I.I LIS ~1 11;' to '25,0001. Whose busizies nii`-4 1 !L . fe a t t•,,r , forined at a less charge. This situation scoucd tota" oics e grantvd for the same purpok. the individii,d, whom, however, he did not lowi''.;, : ai ; 80,0001 to defray the probable :inionnt of Bills drawn, ot wine also SC) guineas to d nian for cutting the children':: 1 ,1 4 to be drawn, for the E4ences of New South Walti for tbe perhaps this person had neVer had a pair of seissArs 1 ,, k ,,,l last year. hand. There were several other minor points. lic "'i l• oiiis 1,9051. for Repairs done to the Fleet Prison fur the laSf. to le:111i tVliether the public received the full bettelit (.4 year. eat ? • • ~' ate l i 1071. for Works and Repairs at the Marshalsea Prison. Mr. AkuvrriiivoT stated, that the person who a " . , 4,4931. ditto King's Bench. 2,1101. ditto Roll ' s-house Chapel. . the Acconnts acted as a Clergynnin also. charr . 4•lr. WIJITBREAII observed that there was also a : . 0 6,5001. ditto flouses of Parliament, and Speaker's Hodie. lain with A salary of i'so/. In what respect Ail(' the Li`i ljes •. 60,0001. flit Building a Peuitentiary-house at Millbank. tlic . Clergyman dilrer from those et the Chapkin ? I , t the On the proposition fur a grant of 20,0001. for making and • 'lle CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER .lia ° l lt ..l l t t s .l'6° -.1.- i a r i t e di n s t i . :l l l:;; ; l to w i l i i: d held i the situation had becu g" ati). in' ' ''.4 repairing Roads in the Highlands of Scothuid, The SPEAKER stated that he had been one of the Commissioners for the expenditure of this sir .1. N I', Wl'U ' itl t .s le tat l e ' t s l tit t u li t a i t ° l:e. Au . "itor was also the I b u i i, money. Besides the roads which had been made, I cumheet of one or two - livings in Ireland; and likr... l iL b l i, j r• ..., he made up the ..-keeounts of the Non-resident ClergY, lit ~ . self being absent from his own duty. • , • - in , there were 13 bridges also, some of them of iron and of 150 loot span. The sum that was 110 W Nlr. ARBUTHNOT replied, that he bad lost his livi; o r, li•eland ill con,..equence of diSeliarging his duty 14 A ° ` stet was something short of what was for anti that he now had nothing but the 300!. per USllitilll iIL, inert y granted for the military roads alone. The ed ro that situation. grant in future would piobably -be only towards ' Arter.soioe further convers a ti on , those roads, the advantiige of which was so clearly Sir J. Newport, Mr IV liithr , 2,id, :• , 11 - -. Croker' -and i t iw o r took p;irt., the Estimate was wicitdrawn, to ,i t: AgailP,' .i l :;, ) , t e. perceived, that three fourth,' of the expense was ted .1.1 t .r OR- Recess, upon the understanding that, th" ''' u w. defrayed by assessment. , ' intet•val, iiiquiries should lie made into ci • :rtaitt poin t ' nected with •the Instituti,M. . Al r. WY NNE thought, that if such large sums of Th- irchitit a , t ,tt _ ., t s iu d u ,, t , . ,, % . ‘as . ' v i glish snap ' ~, ' .: . , ,public money was to Ire given to keep tip the roads chi - in the Highlands of Scotland, Parliament should The House th:2a resumed, and thi.nß‘evh:c•ht ::-lirdbeuretd'n:tie2f:' idso consider whether something ought not to be be received v on limd") .2 • Vol ' - • • given to k cep (ill anti repair the roads in the toted (Awards repairing the--" NEW ORLEANS'.. mountainous parts 'of ' Wales, which lay itt the Mr. WIIITBREAI) postponed, at tic requestof.s,,arrir.;y;jari N ii . c e r t, ( the latter , Gentienian s Motion respecting the • ' line of direct einiUnitnicatiou, hetivecti London and ' tricaas tillotter the recess. of th e Dublin'. ..:_ Mr H. MAItTIN united for a comparative statement 130 Sir JOHN NEWPORT thought, that the road to "P e " ces of the Staff i n E ng l an d, I ordered. • ' Ireland should be as much attended to by the . Pa- The Excise Bill went throwrh ', t ie C 't• , ii qr. lianient of the linseed K i 1 —.llgcolit, as the roads In the Committee un the Pauper ' Lti 4 n m at l i t C:2lsvitun Bil l ' + `lo WIIITBREAD moved a clause by which lunatics alit.C; ) at ic through the Highlands of Setitland. As to the 'admitted paying a third more than the expence of `eta re", roads in Ireland, th e y were well k e pt ti p b y paupers, surety being given by tivo persons, Who Wel' Idt county assessmellts.. •niave (liens on three day's notice, when required so. tt ) d° ,: a l • the relict of the pauper lunatics, who were the Prima* Mr. W. SMITH thought that every ease ought "r ' jests Aftert,f t e l t i . e ns i i p: t t .r i t a ut l i o a . .. e d - to , to stand on its own legs. Ile had no objection .b wi e thi c: i i i n n v e e n r i s j a u t m it: i n ts t . he elatzie sca : s agi: sit as was the report l . 1 col M l r. CltOliEß moved for an account of moue)" i s' t r c e til e . p to ro N p •o c t r iti c g as t e l . ie m s ts un i t ni t t i ( r i c e )p:: i s i c t .:l, h. rt e u s c i l a a ll f i t i ef ‘ s v e a e rd i s „ , ) ( i i f; ) a . tv ( i ) n r t de to re( t l lie Act, to persons for discove ii jectii'm to a similar vote for roads in Alrales,where -: io - ii.;;tt l id 'u e rs td ia'` it ss'as evident that the roads would-not be _so- be- I the Pour Iloese Bile eras ordered tole re ad it suie" oil l .! . ( 1 .1(.., ' , Var.. , seri' neficial to the Districts immediately adjoining, as . d Pa s read.a• third time, an that they could be fairly called upon, to pay the The i o e tin. l .r a. 4 L de r r i: S 4d w e et. j e li d ll ii;)Tett of. AttjOutrat,i. whole expence of them. ...._ ~_.._ Upon a resolution for a vote 0150,0001. towards . . - ' BS. the Coledonian Canal, , .. 13aussELs AND FRANKFORT l'A-P The spE A R NIt ohserred, that he was also a slav Commissioner in this c ase . T he ' original esti m ate BRUSSELS, ATARCIf 11.—A corps r -r of " 5 .0 e. of the expenc e w a s 500,000/ ., an d the whole of troops is assembling at St. Yid', in the 1 0 ,e it e ,i the actual expellee would not: exceed 700,0001. of Luxemlutrgh. Th e troops upon the M O ' 10 • lichen the great increase o f price i n l a b our itiii / in- the neighbourhood of Treves, are - also i " no t ' materials was taken i nto consideratiOn, this ex- (ion. 'lle reasons of th e s e movem ents- are „ cess would not appear by any means extraOrdi- well known: t roite i ; tun y. It was supposed by per sons we ll capa bl e ' '' Numerous couriers continue to pass t ' i `4l . of judging, , that. when this can a l ryas completed, this city with the accou n t of what has pa ss4 '` there would be to much trade on it, the l '''‘"we• finny le ,of ; ce Gertintit Sea ti; the Irish Cliaittiel, as that a Very n' It is said that .111arsInd Massena, . I '''" „ r te. , F:sliiigert, has leccived a letter from 13( 1 "''1,.,/ 4 low charge per tiiunage would pay the interest of . no rt,- . the snot expended. It would save merely in the couched in these terms- I .` Cato t , the •`.,ta .;tu• rate of insurance Bs. or HY,. in the slimmer, and .41.usterlitz to be pla n ted on th e ram p ar ts 01119. 111 : e- :,,,r , perhaps two or three pounds ill the ..vinter. He .1 ant n'an'Ciling to Palis• lt , liall reeoltil' clic. ' - - ' . ~ , ,"ar Ititei.v' that there sv ere 111 HO y valuable eirgoes lying. s e r v iees.' • ''.. 7 " Ibls-. 1 at Chester and I,iverpool, which it , aviT conceived ":Ulm IC 11, .4 LiCtt 4 T 1 F . os ol . a •---- ut Ant); . . • ro c) too (biliCt 1001 to SCtid 411 round (lie island iii is ex peocd here on :he I 2tll, and the EmP c wirter. the 15th. I 'it ...sir r M, ActitCnoMßY- said, that if thi.s.was entirely ' 6 DUSSELDORy, MARCII 1.1.--It seen . s - t j ' hrV il new question,;be,sh o uld7 o pp ose it.' . IVh en t h e S. Smith will be. char,,ed tel reduce the 13. 1' 0 . ` 1 ",; oi States. He buds no difficulty in tile exe c " ( ~c ,ak canal was first suggested, . it was erroneously sup -111,i:o(plylaanc,cetc(ii:(1-.11.,ich the principal,Poweis 11 ' 1 ' posed that it vvolild he the means of preventing • emigration from Scotland.--The ltesolution was then agreed to.. . 'fi l e following Ite.';ohtt ions were then ag reed to ' , -without opposition : -- 1,2001. As . st.q.oratinuation money for Clerks of the public accounts. iiOtSI:, i)i 'CijAfAlt3N . s, MAitcli 17. „, c nr , On :Wednesday Fast:a sitp-Talar esperh-wo., highly illustrative of the powei: of the .3 5 made in Plymouth Yard. The Bo r.ire 3 ' guns was , • le►lre ' t. ” - s , )ati c( up On `t l ie s li p ". Vincent was lately launched, hv mach"T'L,. tb° plied by the riggers of that vzo:d. .I,"lll,l:oe progress of this operation, which poic cr i ; ,d (=ceded, the foreman of the riirgers - v ece i : o vse r severe blow on his neck by the bend of,' Tio Coiling round his neck, and . was o bliged taken, severely - cut and bruised, to Eils I “ )l % . tin" Mrs. WATSON, the female who was "" ' s ole nately shot, with others, upon the late `' i c i c o a a toll' before Mr. ROBINSON'S house, in. Old 13 "*" street, died yesterday in St. George's 1" 1 " 1 1 1 ) . 06 1 - An Inquest is summoned to sit upon 1. this day. v 011"" On Monday evening, the body of " e i ;(,to 3- man who unfortunately lost, his life 13 0 " 1 ` r street, was buried in the most private tholoperli St. Ann's, Soho, hi s afilicted father v er Y 0 13c 4 taking every precauti on t o k ee p the time. a" 0, ' ve il of his interment unknown to all ex ce P t , furb" few friends, to avoid the collection Of ""Y, er wl' ° lent or riotous spi r it s , w hi c h would ot d probably attend slid) an occasion. A shoemaker's wife, of Upwell, tb e , c stt 3 ' Ely, left her husband and two childron 13 ' } w an' et day with a journeym a n ca rpenter, a "W l.i "" taking with her 1301. awl a sufficieneYe d ar tcl hempen cloth for 16 s hi r t s , but ‘‘l.re Pu rst`t B" v taken at Elden Gap, between Thetford hair ton Mills. The man, upon finding hhore sued, forsook the lady and fled ;Lc-fos s i l : o oki t 't but Mr. ‘Vhistler pursued and succeede" I w i t h him, when h 6 was seated upon a hor se o atb e , hands tied behind, and the iady upot o fro b li e horse, and were thus escorted to the I ) 3 1, of t whence they fled, after expending ab" tit propevty.---,(Cambridge Chronicle-) it;,0301. For the expense of pFintit;reports, aid tit her japers for the ti , e,of the !louse. . For, reprinting Jonrnalc, &e 2,5001. Printing . Votes of thellonse during the present ses- Sion. .34241. To a- deficiene. of the grant-for 'Hinting papers for the use of tho• Lords. 21,0001.. For defraying expenses of printing- Acts of Pat la meat FOr stationary for the two Houses of Parliament. 4,2001. For the - incidental expenses relating to the two Houses. 2,6701. for French -Refugee Clergy, under the Edict of Nantes.. Sir G. MATIICOTE took the opportunity of this vote to enter his protest against this country ta l c _ jag any part in the contest _which might arise in France, either tor King Louis the 18th ur the Emperor Napoleon. 4,3551. fur the French Protestant Refugee Laity (under the Edict of Natites).. - Mr. ARBUTHNOT stated. that the pensions under this head would expire with the persons now oo the list. 7231. for Protestant Dissenters in Ireland. 1,6031. for ditto in England. 1.3,0001. for Americ4nl,oralists. , 3;61. to the Poor of St. M ar tin' s i n th e Fi e ld s. 3,0001. for the Vaccine Establishment. 'A tote of 7,9551. for 'the charges of the superintendanee of Aliens, was proposed, but withdrawn at. the stu:gestion of Mr. ‘VIIITBREA D, to lie again proposed, accompanied - with a statement of the items: 12,41001. was voted for,rewards paid for conviction Of felons. OVIr. Lout:luta expressed his opinion that the system of rewards on convictions was impoliti c . On a,vute of 77,48t1. hein,q proposed for the expence of thee. erovkayine'llt bt convicts iu the hulks; Mr. BENNET stated that great abuses existed in the Hulks; he wished fo• kn ow whether his Majcstv's Govern ment, who seemed lake-warns on the subject, biotin coo templation any system by which the Hulks Would in pact or altogether be superseded? Mr. ARBI;THNOT said that a coca had that evening been voted towards the erection of a Penitentiary House. Mr. HOLFORD said that the erection of the Penitentiary House would not supersede the necessity of the Bulks, less some other steps was taken. All manner of aliuses eN 7 isted in tlieu ships—coining, stealing, and all other crimes were committed. After a few words ffiirtr nr. C. LoNG, Mr. GOULBOURN said the sahject would conil hefore:the . House, as the Act expired in the present Session. The stint was voted". Upon the estimate of- 14,0001. for the eXpe,tc.es of Bow street,-W. BENNET itiquire.d whetter any• steps had been taken to organize a sufficient civil fuiec to secure the peace of the "met roPolls, and :animadverted • the continuance of •piilitary which still patruled the streets, though not the slightest distill - fiances now. existed? The CHANCELLOR of the. EXCHEQUER and Mr. LOCKHART defended the conduct of Government; and „t - t e e,is i trw wa.kciLs' from:Mr. B. Bathurit and Mr. Tierney, the Resolution was !.irried. Thee foll Owing suns were alsh voted :- 5090kt0 defray the expenees of, prosecuting' for coining. Lori! ArtCHHIALD HAMILTON •-rernarltild Upon the magnitude of the sum, when there was • notoriously no coin in th,e..tunlm thittcould I.lv illegally coined; aud.Mr.LIORN.L.It Ships al rr , , j to ".. 6:3; Newcasti (. : t:4 : AL -.1--S‘liill4("sFill;:i.d.:lll.A.R.c.l4fll:..o • . ce a t:) , • Oa t" ,Suntletilthti I I ........ 4• l s. to 2 Ciiidevs .... 545• • iit i A p I, f o e:::! , rt a y4 a y g e T r s in a Tb °rri Ly - - ' , 1_,1 . 1. clia,ructet , VAS ')n1y,5.4 inches ippeig.ht, N ' ' ' ore - • 31' S I C ° b . . i Npi . 9pirtionately la e, upon which he 1 .. th he l e ng t ', ' 1 , cocked hat. Ahotita fortni...:lit before his th-it.et io 0 1 ; 0 . . ii Mr - an undertaker, and liespokc - a: cotli ti Sis , e .,pre s' - ' : . i ll :i' resident t lie 7r i ti ;lY)out3, N r ° o f t l r i 3 n i g ' 1 1 771 1 ' 1 1 :; r1 :1 1; c i ' : , ' , 15, LI . I: which, Ivt.cti brought home, hi . ; got into, on . , i. ; ade f 7 t atl' self perfectly Satis fi ed with the. e xe c ution f I r ' fac rly '''' ificome,was handsome, wil4:1), it is said, tw it' . by mendicity. ' ~,,,......."....e...- AVCr. (11 . OP -, ....... • No. ~ , i 0) LONDON Li:Driiited 1) LJullit.'o,7l,;"l;,-Vilis, 1 : ~,tti'; l'"ildirigs; anti p111,1) 3 :1ed 1); WI A. ". , ( { " l^ :„': c -kc;',, - 5 0 41 ' at the StIN-OFFLek: t No. i ii, Stranit ; % .; t l. ,..;:aftla r ' ZIVIIU, Ortirns, Lettcrslpost-raid), 5,(7. 111°' 1 li