The Sun. — London, England, 1820-10-19 00:00:00

l'er Cent. • t k ..„ l ik s. ‘ ~,k ,s ) P.. ,,,,,„ ..,,. ...1 .." • I *- V .. . i , c) ...., -.. 0 xtt . _ , .• , -•-• ‘4,:i -i v i ... : ,,- ; ':: - . _ 41 A1C 4 ?,A, , '''' --<.• .. I ._.. ~ • ~, , . r• ~ , '- 4-t----t , ,-.- ~ - , im .. !• ',- , „ A "r 4 - .--.: 4 k . 14 / WI Tr* _Af j i . ..., ".•:• . 2 '.. F. •. `.?,. ll ' Afr k5414 14, f d 7'l ...\ ' -A,.... • .1, 4 -" . 05 'llll2O3Ra i,,,--,.., , , i iik - r-e-44e-e -e- ev . ::. o z . , t-4-,--i.:_?-- ) _ _ ..4.- ' , . . , d in rQ idC~pC bO' r W b 0, /7 / • - k . •• 411.1m33 ra 8/04. e j in THURSDAY, OCTOBER 19, 1820. Eisba r i Pr esi icB u [PiticE SEVUNrEeg. . _ r lc 7 v , -,/LLzyG-.o F F,rag, Oct. 17, 1820. JOE COMMISSIONERS for Notice!VlCTUAL ivo MAJES7'Y'S • NA) 7 Y do hereby give 1- eaa , that on Friday, the 27M I nstant , they will be ti,,V 8 to „ ctiue Tenders in writi ng ( sea led up) and treat for - * Play of whateljer BAVIN'S may be demanded for the ser spa' ee n f ir i lia Majesty' s B a k e h ouse at Deptford, during the , 7 , Le , welue .31intles f rom that day. , Conditions of the Contract ?way be seem at the Secre- QP A, Y.° qgce, - •'0 re • 4,1 44/1 g ar d . wi 11 be had to any Tender in Which the Price ' 1 " b e inserted i n words at length, or that shdil. , Ir ri '..:(e,deliaered to th e BO ar d before One o'Clock ois the said. Qy tt ie t4e.27.th !ottani, nor unless .the Person who makes Iti,„,„_ 4ier, or same Person on his behalf, atiernif to answer c o ted 4 .„ t e a t I• • . • tender must also be accompanied by a Le:ter, signed two t4e p at et l' b uible Persons, engaging to become found f+ itli ek e : 771 le "derihg, in the Penal Sum of L. 500, for the ~....e,rforniGlhef of the Contrad. • _-,..________ . Prt II ICr YsiLLING-OFFICE, Ort. 10, WO. 41' ,CO3 /MISSIONERS , for , YICTUA I,— tic, „ LIN G Mb 31-I.IES7•Y'S - NAVY do keeeby Kt - ye No ree:. ''" 'a Friday. the 20th instant,ihey will be ready to 7•A, 'e rea ders in 26;•iank (sealed np), and treat _for Ona le t " : " See k' of Kiln dried HOUS,EHOLD FLOUR (to 7 7 - 1: -." re the usual warranty of Twelve Mouths 0 One 4 e4 o c a u na Quarters of new ENGLISH YEAS; Three Hun- New c - t"e" of ATew Pale and One Hundred Quarters of iCe visi " : 4 l7, dr ied AMBER MALT; and Fifty Bags of Nero t n Tles l i eS ; the Mat and Hops to he ansive , :awe' r ';','lette,l:,,T e d r oroter of not less than one Quart each) to . b.i t ' 4 ' --"' - the 7 ' lers- and the whole to bedeltvered tu o c'l‘ ( "'e nt j :„i y il ' '' Pictt e t 7 allin; Stores at Deptford, in the space 7`,i, , . tg 9.3 0 C , 7 ,. (litionS. of the Contracts maybe seen at Me Secre- N o z`ce. ' ll ail; e A'ard will he katt to anti Tender in which the Price 44 4 °1 6 e jaserte l • t Words at leaVh, or that shall n!t be 11 4, 0 . 7,N the lb 1 ; befare One o'clock on the said Fri , dp, 'ler `ri istant; hoar d utiles ' sgthe Person who makes the Len "; ac o o r p t " H e Person en his behalf; attends, to awing:. .., 5... _ 'tt lin% kk BY W. MOUNTAIN and Co. i l l A,cEN'S HEAD INN. SNOW-HILL, LoNnom P r .14- ' folio:wing POST-COACHES, ' MAIL ', COS . b "Rox,,`„t • Cli ES, .&e. set our from the above Inn : '''st e " I 'ON . , Chatham, Rochester, anti Gravesend New . ''le, 1°,.,4eb, every Afternoon at Half-past Four. Fare, in- PA: i . outsid e Ga. ' s ull 1; ()I - I TH, Penryn Truro, Bodrnin, Liskearil, Ply ,,ty 1 - s'els, Plymouth, ' 'l'inness, Newton Bushell, Exeter, vp()s ' 4 , k cl bao ti), Dorchester, Dattniontli, and Salisbury, ne‘. Axminster, id ' I I 'very inorni r,, ,, at. Seven ;t hi ough Houdin), Axinins .s , lynrt, I llatulfinli - Basingstoke, and ,Bagshot, arrives at skj,„' u th the next evening at half-past Eight. 11 : 4s. o 'lliA mi r roN 1 puingtott, Winchester, Andover, and : tl i t,.. ll: N T'e New FOUL' inside Coach at half-past Serene, cloek . '"lf -,, -"tiring arrie at the Dolphin Ism, SouthaniptoW , , bi t et. ' " as t Five -' O ,- ,l„ e e k s .—Tlsis is a most delightfal Con :", to the Isle of Wight, Havre de Grace, Jersey, ti at , tIA T ), St. Maloes, Cherhurgli, 4 5 .:c-, •-• ', • ~.. - - t e, lli a ,! I ,,autl BRIS'IOL Flying Post-Coaches, through : Chip . - iP--' ? %l H .s. ',` - '"llse, and Marlborough, every Afternoon ; Amite - < t ''' ' n .. --a Ys, the Greyhound Inn, Bath, and the London -,,, Ti,„„ ) , ~,,f, and the Swann, Bristol, next Morn ' l ilhor' t ches to Wells Bridgewater, Taunton, Exeter, and I• ii th, si. ,o, ki,.),IPIRE, a New LIVERPOOL Light Coach, only one ~ e s , 't the Road carrying Four liisitles . ,and Four Out -4,t1t0l -43., Northamptons Welt""' l'ttl its out every ' Day, through ‘Dunstable., Wohnrn ,Lutterworth, . Hinckley,... d vVk--.4i'144:1", Lichfield, Stone, Rugely, Newcastle, knutseoi , Stii,,, , ton and Preston. . .. . tt ';)" F r ;.‘ S : II IJILY, Wellington, and Shitfnal, Post-Coach, "IT ''''''lns; at Five o'clock.—Guarded., 1. 1 44 ; ; I °U . TH I; .1 ester, Blandford,halisbury, Andn , r ‘ er, ,• : % ,13- '''‘'st I- ' i or w c. i i. st Coach, every Afternoon. Ihe lii dilriutr Packets''•• o • ' 3 -►• • Cherburg, St. Ma "i, 8,„ ' to Guernsey, et•sty, a4.,' • ',..), m n ew li ,, ' htenach, called The Rockinghatn, sets i i i i i ut 11:` 1 Roe s ' I nI ng, at Eight o'Clocls ; carries Four Insides 0 31 ) h a Guard througut. Passes' /4 t i i t l: u ! , l ' , itt'tif:o kraelbl Gorden \ Y ' e e W is a : r l, l_ ~ w , t i l t:e tfot il ~ Do ncas te r , L aud Ferry • i Leeds, next morning. N . 0t . ,-• 411,':t4riding c mon Expedition. of this Coach, !t is V Y st ,d t° be the " agteeable and complete public Cots , Gl,,, i ' "a the Nardi ula' Sioad being unequalled by any other.. kirg w .' i stiON V,longtown,' , Grettia-greeit, Annan, Diotri . e i s l , 44 al l i d,lll, Thor;thill, Sampiliar-Kiln, Canniock, Kingswi. ,- yo„,,l'irts of Scotland, a Post Coach (daily). _ . _ ew.. tkatie", Sc arborough, W hit by, Shields, .aunder . land, c ls ar . I,fito4.l‘and E.ditilaiirgii New Four Inside Coa.ch, wi a lief u ' "td, y.'" ,l uti sets out ' es - cry Morning by way of Newark, .. m i. rt „ th, • til ' e „ a tet ! Darlington, Northallerton, Durham, ~,. o e 1 '''' tl .-' "etwick. Passengers fing themselves fati!., t u t "'te l .: , . I "ltitey, may rest s'Yhat time they please, and t lea NI ,7,' on without any -additional Fare. . . ._ • _ i , throsiIk'ILBOROUGH and Swindon, new fonr ; inside . Coacl , l't%,,,„Kh Aldbourn, Reading Lainhourn, Pluton, Lyclington, titity',Y, Wootton Basset, ilLishury, Hungerford, and New littli,",,.etY Nloriling. d L t ), ;•", EN Oß'PH'&Walsal Post Coach, eves y evening. , e", . . 1: ,,,, , Spalding, Pete, horough„ Stilton, and Hunting, - ' i sl l'- ' 4 ` Mail C a h every Es':ening. to Spilsby, Louth, (.!11 Ha nd Hull o . c ' C A " 'h i aA LE, Penrith,. and Wbiteharen, Four Inside Post, u - -)spi,i -". a Guard all the way, passes through Brong e , VS nil )!', Greta-buid e, Richmond, Cattericli, Borouglibi idi,e, r,„"7,1.,'3', Aherlordg, Doucaster, and Grantham. Sets out tacillt ''''''llin, and performs the journey with great teleas-IT• Pass:l:goers detained on the Road by business or t ared i t s have the peculiar advantage of their Seats being. ae ith tc.E N t i , e next Coach. ChorL`k., Lancaster. Preston, Kirby-LOts,sdale, Bolton, Iso n l -1, 01 niskirk, and Garstang Post Coaches, every After- Liv Eun 11 ` 1 L'l 7 ):,9°L Warrington,. Knotsfond, , Stone, Stafford,. . 4 th '"eld, ' Coach , The Defiance, every Evening ~..,..- , Post ed Ik e ' 4l ' , Oteif s Held Inn Dale-street, 4iverpoot,—G6tard k.o.l,ll.l, .., 0 . , , kic_ ..., 0 . , ,„Qtn i •',' l 'l EU) Post -Coach every Mortiitg,"• ~. . _ , o•ttliw.,...l;Elt, Newport', Wl:itehurch, Tari‘orley, ‘ lsiantwich, Nu N N i i ti Alidillewich Post-Coach, eaery Evening. li"rti'';,l),l.itl.AN'O, Stockton, - and Yarn:. Coach, every NI 1.,"\ - ;'" `"• the Gem' •'t o Sunderland. -, .. (~,, .., , George • i , i '(l ii• ; 11 •VS i Eat, Winslow, Coogleton, Newcastie,Walsal, N-1-IF°l,Yetikiiiitiot Post-''macii, - very Afternckn. Guarded . .. ll Atia rz ?' 11l ELO and Itotlie; " halli Post-Coacta, call `d thelt"k , 11 11t\i i ,`,YrY )ooriting. - . . i;fte rr . . AMA NI Post ' Gooch, Guarded, sets vita , every 'as ~- I' :", i , and -reaches liiro . lizio ,next day at Noon s .— k.4 44%: ) ,Y WariviC\ 1 Leamington', and Dayentry, tn the . a litiLdead, Rua, street Birmingham. C ''' , vl L ' N orthea‘;,, How ' deli, Thorn, and Doncaster, Post I \llt r i,'' "Cr Y Merl ir i s ' • t half-past Six, to the troaii KL.lbi boekt•-tilate, Hul i l. a half-past Pe‘,,tsbEß;Deal,Margkte, Sandwich, Ramsgate,Canl , erbi L ivy s , leir ri . 'l l , ato, Chatliam,- fkoehester;and Stroud, Post-Coc. lc , 111,...„5s Noon aud N•zJit . *r .. till"• 3 'ol,trt Ix I- 1i 't.i A an d Cheshunt Coach, C•y I , . --, ....are, o- n.ioesoon, ~Ilyi„„`'ining. c l;ilf.., i -'•.NIiAN-1 and Edmonton Coaches (daily), at,Eleven, Iv Past Two Fi ve and Eilst o'Clock- I'4l :Lid It/e-NiAIN ' .a - nd Co. , respectfully acquaint their 4 11 y , ' an d Public, that they will not lie accountable fo 14144 141 L 'els ' P asseßgel's Luggage, Writings 4 Plate, &c. for , l ' i s a. iv , e s Pzu i :itls Value, if lost, stolen, or damaged, St . l, l' l l % s t 4- 4, ' and the litstirance paid for accordligly , Ittl icest's kitad inn,.uoW-hill, London. - we re r Law CPS / a .could Aube' TeSe fit r". ho fait, • 113t Ce be blitrii tt j i t al)le . S" CV" ~ttc.v?:~~i lent d Le 10 D , ste.l _ ~n fi Itoev f his for auE,410.. at nli jAyilig:otte,! lavell-5 ti3c, Er'' vbeil out post tt 1 '.;• 9 0 4 cu t he bil l "( 0 3.7 , at t' h i ❑• •itit . " r ceL.tio “1,0),,,,i • , f n I%e Ir cr : i il ! " 'lice g''W v;,st - Ill 'is lit' !, - 10 ft', O il it!' H) :o lOW 1 7e id *C‘ : 4 s/ 3 tr , 0 , r for 1 0 ` .ti e I,lly 1 2, „ Ici►r r 11 ' 1 , ' : : 0; 1 '.. ) disro .. ,l l " h e t was, . 0 c" of z" ) ' Jo. wrotc . • (I d ' 'lt It . 1 ' 'el ~c 4 .g I r Et -gulf s ' 00 e st fe r;' , ‘ , o woi ffly 39 0 :0 0 , !°' . t • re fitter .cipe uiac it i ocil i i ;, tc e i nib" :eil c b ; 1 1 •at e ,( 1.0 ,0 i" • v c'or leo It Icl ar o io o t f 11 OU lj ; , to i Ol . r iette' al ,6 ,00 0 ,,,1it° 0 1 0 0, that -P ,o: 11 1 ,1 oct 'oh 3 ' pet' ,Just * fbei t 'r o ,o c s u O u7l :! , sl' d o ot t C I ( I ircu t 4lO ll i v/ t ot . o il' e ooceit, hav e 01) 11 , ; 'Totr i l ) ,t e ( tl rili n g' 5 ° terl j 11 °' O f iei nan le' 40 1p4 f' l OW ; 5 11ei l ? , glitiO°ll [1 lie cor-- e3 0 % ive t , 5 ,here b y .1' I , q l ,rof 41 1/ a t ' 0)" FOR THE SUN. REMARKS ON HElt MAJESTY'S DEFENCE. OCT. 14, 1820: ,The extravagant • and audacious assertions • of the advocates for the QuEEN,.and the gross ..mis representations and statements of the licentious and intlarmnatory Press, that the Bill •of Pains and Penalties is slain ' destroyed, demoliShed- , - that air the Evidence brought forward: in sup port of the Charges is corrupt, wicked, and in famous the nefarious fact of filenames and cha racters'Of the Witnesses, and all concerned .for, the presecution . , being . held up to the indignation: and violence of the . deluded multitude render it absolutely necessary toexamine the Eiidence that has had this extraordinary . effect. However well disposed. the Witnesses subpcened the partof the QbErr, Might 'be to speak in favour of her MA./Est - V . . the generality of them had been but a very short time in her MAJESTY'S society on the' Continent, and that soon after BERGAMI'S firstad. mission into ker familn • beforeall reserve. in. re- , 'sped - to him was laid aside,. and her MAJESTY as Yet continued to live An respectable society. They could only say they s•ate nothing impro per between her MAJESTY and BERGA1111 ) and surely that it is not wonderful in the short time they were in. the QUEEN'S company. • Mr. ST. LEGER, the first Witness, Only accompanied her Royal Highness to - Brunswick, and there left her. He neither saw nor heard any thing of Bergami, who was not then in her Royal Highness's service. Lord Guieneoan's Evidence was favourable in some re spects, as to what he did not see, when he was with : her Royal Highness. But from this Evidence we can collect sufficient to substantiate much of the preamble of the Bill. We find, that on his Lordship's first visit to her Royal. Highness, he had seen Ilergami in the capacity' of a courier, had been wait ed upon at table by him in the dregs and livery of a menial servant. ' On his last 'visit he found this lacquey, asps fellow `Aqiest, and actually seated at table next to her Royal High ness. It also appears from his Lordship's evidence, that be fore this time all the English bad deserted her ; no person of respectability was seen at her Villa, In short, so changed, so degraded was the society of the Palace, that there was now djfcrence small, . " Betwixt the Parlour and the Servants' . Fur her Royal Highness was not content .with placing her Courier at the same table with a Nobleman of the highest distinction, but must add the additional insult of other-Mem: hers of ' that Courier's family being also present. Nor must we forget theike-a , tete on the lake of Como, established• by his Lordship's evidence. • Lady Cu iimorre LINDSAY, during the short time she saw, Abe Princess, also gave the same negative testimony iu her favour. Indeed the Evidence. of all the Witnesses in this case is of the same negative nature.. Their statement a what themselves saw or did not see, can be no contradiction or refutation of whit others had witnessed. But .On the crosS examination of these respectable Witnesses it appeared, that 'Lady Charlotte observed, that the reports of her Royal High ness's-conduct were of sech-a 'degrading nature; that it ope rated upon her mind in making her wish not to continue in her service. • And it appeared that she received a letter - from Lord Guildford, requesting her to quit that service. In the Evidence of Lord 9LEY4EavLE and Lord -LLANDAFF, Oleic is nothing material. There is very little material alierin the Evidence of Mr. 'Kenna. CRAVeist.•He attended his Royal Highness but a short time, and quitted her at Naples.,-- Bergami had been only lately engaged at. Milan as a tempo rary servant in her Royal Highness's family; yet it seems that so young a man as Mr. Craven already thought it ne cessary to give the somewhat premature, though fatherly and kind cannon to his aged Queen, not to be seen scathing alone in the garden with Bergami, suggesting that spies were em ployed. This seems rather early for such suspicion, as Her gami had been so short a time in her service, and not many months had elapsed since her Itoyal Highness bad left Eng land. Mr. Craven says, he hired him just before they left Milan, otethe recommendation of the Marquess Ghisiliat He endeavours to prove the gentility of this quondam Corpo , ral in the French Army, by representing that the person who recommended bins expressed a wish that he should be pro tooted in,The Princess I service, but it appears the only object of the application was , that be who had been engaged as a temporary servant to go to Naples should be continued in the family. Sir WILLIAM GELL, who observed "the most marked alien lion" of BEFIGAMI towards his Royal Mistress, has an extra ordinary recollection of the precise time she retired from the opera. and the dress she wore i at the Masquerade at Naples, nearly six years ago, and the elyinges it underwent, in direct contradiction to the evidence of the Princess's wailing wo man. and of her, footman of courier. The rest of Sir Wil liam's evidence is all of a 'motive quality, and . does not in any degree rebut or refute th t charges brought its support of the Bill. The evidence of CAttruNal:ox, Sir William Gell's set-Sant ; although evidently well prepared by her Majesty's legal ad visers, and at Brandenhurgh House, was fully exposed on cross-questioning ; he clearly contradicted himself. or, as the Queen's Advocates call it, has perjured . himself 4;11 several • points: especially, he declared, that he had nerved onboard no other ship of war but the Voictiers. in his:re-examina-• tion on a subsequentday, however, he amended this account, and acknowledged that he had served on board three or four ships, and that he had been pressed. There is something very mysterious in his account of being rated as a Midship man, as he passed from the Poictiera--it' is very certain be never was a Midshipman, nor acted as such in any ship. But the great burthen of his evidence is a conversation that pass ed between him and Majocci, concerantig the Baron Ompteda, all recollection of which Majocci denies. Here is oath against oath—and it remains to he proveil, whether Majocci's oaths is not - fully as much to berlepended upon as Carrington's.. As to .foxy Wnrrcomae, servant to Mr. Craven, his evi dence does not materially contradict the evidence with respect to the apartments, to which he , was examined, but exposes himself by his promptness to, say that he used to be invited into Mademoiselle Dumont's apartments,, and to be locked up there. If he could prove her conduct to lie as bad as that of her betters, it could not invalidat i e her evidence in respect to facts so fully corroborated by other evidence. Smarm; who had been many years in the household of her Royal Highness, enjoys a .pension of 4001. during her plea sure, though now no longer in her service. He speaks prin cipally of her Majesty's gracious deportment to her servants. St hat he says respecting the Dresses and the Masquerade is not very essential. He admits that lie.bad no opportunity of observing her conduct towards litrganii except during the short time he was at Naples. He 'admits also that there was a passage or communication between her Royal Highness's bed room and B t . r4 .„, nt 's, and thus sepports the evidence of Majecci and Dumont, who both spelte of the .proximity of ✓ooms and facility of communication, which was first adopted ▪ Naples i o this ear ly lingo of the intercourse, artd con staidly and uniformly existed ever aft, rwards. But this old and respectable servant was stain sent off, and never sires' tier Royal Highness again till he cart led net an account of the death of the King some years afterwards. Doctor 1 - 101•LANu wentahn7 no t d with u irt2 i, l! ti e i r Royal Hi6ness in 1814 as her physician, but i long in her service after Bergami's introduction, who aIJ ays waited at table as servant or cuurier while be was with , her Royal Highness anti never dined at table.—bocter Pollan(' never s:,,e her Royal Highness except when sent fer, and sae. , nothing im proper io her conduct towards Bergfoui. Mr. ABEL: visited her Royal Highness at different times when Bergami dined at table, lit of course saw no :indecency of conduct pasti between those iscii Colonel I. nut t.l,x stated that he knew Berger Non-commissioned Officer in the Preach Army under the Viceroy of Italy, and That lie had conducted himself with propriety, and was private courier to General Pino. CAnt.o Foam - I had been 'Cabinet Courier to the Viceroy of Italy. tie was afterwards engaged as cuatiet to th e p i incess as a of Wales. He accompanied her from Rum` to Sinigaglia on horseback as courier, and says Saccbi went forward in a car riage before, denying that Satehi rode as courier on that Jour ney. He says that the'Conoless of Oldi, Bergami, and the Child Victurine, travelled this journey iu the carriage with her Royal Highness`Until the Countess of Oldi was taken ill at Loretto, and went into the second carriage, aniMadame 1)11mont took her seat in the carriage of her Royal Highness. On the journey from Milan to Rollie he said Saccbi was ", chef tisat could notcantintte :fa ride on horseback* a" went in a carriage. On crossquestiouing,theevidence of Carlo Forti became very confused, and in parts conttadictory, but on the whole it directly contradicts the evidence of Sacchi as to !isling ors horse Lack• as courier. ' It remains to be proved which of their evidence is to bedcpenJed oa. He also gives a full accountof the family of Bergami, si‘hich had exclusively• and wholly occupied her Royal Highness's Household. Lieutenant FLYNw's-eVidence was announced as one that would he highly favourable to her ttoyal Highness,. that would overset all the malevdlent evidence. against tier. .otr his ex ' tuninntion in 'chief he asserted every thing most favourable and ruundly ; hut, after a long cross- questimling, his fallacy upon many points became So self-evident that he fainted, and his evidencewas 'rejected by both aides, and even by his own Cou n s e l. Much. also was expected from Lieutenant HowNaat, the son of an ofd Pag-e:to her Royal Highness, to whom the Urine nafirowed .`eery thing, and toi -die examination its chief he gifevesn intrepid evidence in her favour; but on a long cross ouestianiug, Ins evidence proved, iu many respects, as un favourable to his.ratrtiness as that of Lieutenant One has actually admitted with may be virtually and directly inferred !rhos the testimony of the other, that her Royal High ness arid Bergami slept regularly every night, by themselves; in the same Tent, in darkness, during the long voyage front Jaffa to Syraceise, and as Lieutenaot Holston:1 was tire only person in any degree respectable that. wa.: left in her Majes ty's Household, we regret to and our idea of the criminality of her Majesty is So far from being diMinished or removed by his testimony, that-the strongest possible presumittive evi dence of an uninterrupted adulterous intercourse having cab sisted•for inure than two.months on hoard the pulacca, is strengthened and confirmed. indeed' we waysay established, by it. There seems, to be a'great lack of witnesses when 1s r.Gam4- yiLLaSsfaitee was brotight forward' to say thathe had seen a certain dance in the East Indies, which is by no means prov ed to be the same as that with which Mabowet amused her Royal Highness. Of one thing we are, certain, that if cor rectly represented in the House of Lords by Theodore, the grossly indecent • and lascivious motions of the brittal Malannet could-afford amusement but to the most depraved minds, and were such as no virtuouslemale could have con templated but with horror and disgust. - • The Fxamination .of SAx'riNo Guuotaut, the factor, and Gant:oust, the mason,- as to Maui and k.ve and the leaves, is not material. The attempt is to provethat the per sons employed could not see Arians and Fi e in the Grotto when they were at work ou the Cornices 'in the Octagon room, at the Villa d'Este; but it appeared on the former exa mination that they descended from their scaffold when they heard voices in or near the Giotto. The rest of their evidence ' did not refer to the Charges against her Majesty. We have thus taken a view of the evidence of all the persons who have hitherto been brought forward iu defence of her MAJESTY to overset the charges against her and can ;my fair, candid, and honest man, say, that, instead'of destroying and demolishing all the evidence brought against . her, it has not absolutely confirmedsand establish ed the material parts of. it. We are aware that till all the defence was. heard it was de sirable to- mid condemnation, - but the . spirit. of condemnation whiclr has • prevailed so en tirely on the, other side, forces us to snake -ob servations which otherwise might have been. avoided. We way ask whether the evidence has justified her conduct in any one respect? It seems 130 W, that there is no matter of real conse quence to controvert, unless it should be thought necessary still farther to attack the testimony of DuAtoNT, MA3occi, and SACCIII. One Courier swears, in direct opposition to the evidence of another Courier, that the other did not ride as Courier with her Royal Highness on a partiCular. occasion. And Sir W. GELL'S servant swears that,ll.4..roccx held a particular conversation with him on the subject of Baron ODIPTEDA, which MAJOOM positively - denied.. But supposing all these witnesses quite out of - the question, is the Adulterous intercourse' disproved ? Is it not ad mitted---is it not proved on the cross-examination of Lieutenants VLYNN and HowNAm, as well as by the Captain and Mate of the polacca ? But if that -is-not sufficient to satisfy and convince the most incredulous, we have still . unrefuted the clear, sensible, simple, and irresistible evidence of BARBARA KRANTZ, or KRESS, a witness cer tainly very_ unwilling to' appear at their Lord ships' Bar, which - seemed' to satisfy' every ose that had heard it. She swore that bringing wa ter to RERG AUX'S' bed-room, 1.352R0AM1 was in bed, the Princess -sitting on the -bed, and his arm round her neck ; and that, on her coming in, the Princess jumped up. Nor is it necessary to 4411 about the number of days the . waiter, PIETItO Cucisi, states her Royal Highness to have pass ed at Trieste. It cannot be expected that a waiter should, after the lapSe of several years, have any-exact recollection of the number of days that every passenger has resided at the hotel, but he speaks decisively to the fact that he.sawßEtto.tolt come out of the Princess's room . at eight o'clock in the morning in his dressing gown and drawers, and that BEItGAMI'S bed had not been occupied during the night. Is not the preamble of the Bill completely proved ? Does it not appear , from the evidence for the defence that the household of the QUEEX consisted entirely of the family of BEttcrAmt, all from low situations„ and that her .house. vas filled with them, his mother, his sis ters, his brothers, his cousins, and his. child, and that the .wife of PERGAMI (the most proper to take care of the child) was the only person ex cluded ? And that every English person, except Lieutenant HowsAm, had long been dismissed, or laud deserted her MAJESTY, and that all re spectable society had dune the same. There is'no -cireumstance in this extraordinary business more disgusting than the imp u d e k at tempt to represent in language the most intla.m matory every 'thing that has been brought for ward ; all the proceedings within the House, and all the investigation that led to it as a wicked .onspiracy, and the fruits of the most groSs and .scandalous subornations of perjury, which the assentors no more believe themselves .than• they can do in the • innocence of the QUEE N . If any thing further was wanting to render this most nefarious misrepresentation of the advo. cates and abettors„of the QUEEN more odious and detestable in the eyes of all the well. disposed part of the community, it would lib supplied by the treasonable and seditioto Anr savers to the. Addresses of the stupid / silly, deluded •multittitle.- And we may add last, not least, the unparalleled attempt to put an end to the Inquiry in its present stage so peremptorily demanded and fOtr-ed on by her MAJEsTY / an Inquiry - which every individual in the Nation; was most anxious to avert, ex• cept her MAJESTY'S Advisers and Abettors.- It is impossible to drop the business where it now is. It would disgrace the character 'of the Na tion—it would disgrace the Legislature—it would debase the most respectable Court of Judicature, which, if any demerit attaches to it, has already yielded'too much on the present odious 'occasion. France'was lost by weak and timid concession - and Want of firmness, and through 'the same alotta• can the United Kin dom be Tinned. * * LONDON. JOURNALS. [154 I L EXTRACTS.} FROM THE MORNING PAPERS.. [Morning Post] Tiix govsN.---Notwithstanding , the opinion expressed by. the Judges, that the questions pro posed to be put respecting the conduct -of Vimi carti and. Riganti could not be allowed, unless, the agency of those individuals had been pre viously proved,. the Attorney-General, from .a desire to allow all possible latitude to the -ac cused, yesterday gave up the point in dispute, on an understanding that he. should be at !iberty to brio; new witnesses to rebut any evidence which might now be produced. The Earl of Liver pool also - . expressed hiinself desirous that the fullest inquiry should take place into the acts of Vimicarti and Rigauti, and the Rouse having admitted their agency as established, ordered the examination of - Point:lli to proceed: [The Times.] The first business of yesterday was to receive the opinions of the Judges on the question sub •mitted to -them the day before; tliese were to a certain degree indecisive, the case being new. The evidence vas therefore admitted, by which . it was proved that the 'witness was bribed by Virnicarti td. steal letters from his master's office relating to the Queen. The witnesswas ill-paid, and had a tender conscience ; the first of these circumstances might perhaps produve the se cond ; and, to dive deeper into the matter, the pay might be bad because the information relat ing .to an innocent woman was, of necessity, un important. The witness seemed. to allow that he had been a knave, but thought Brown a greater; however that may be, Brown, at least, waslwtter paid. Far be it from us to say that a man may not be really and sincerely affected by thecon sciousness of his deviation from an honourable course ; the witness of whom we are speaking, Pomarti, may 'be a proof of it. We should hail with, acclaim a similar change of .heart and man ners in Brown. [New Times.] The QUEEN'S COUNSEL are endettiouring for the present to run away from the strong points in the case against them, in order to raise a clamour on the stale' grounds of .subornation and conspi racy ; but they will be fdrced , to' come hack bye and bye to the polacca scene, and the va rious other instances of approximation between the Queen and her Courier. It strikes us that there can be no satisfactory proof of her Majesty's innocence, but by calling Bergami as a Witness. If he is not a par ticeps criminis, why should he not appear ? Are they af`rald that he will fame aumy under the" sul _ phureous - ly hot" work of a cross 7 examination ? They are pledged to cm:tradict Barbara Kress. They are pledged to produce Marlette iDentont to contradict her sister.. We think it right to re ' mind the .Learned Counsel of a few of these par ticulars, lest they ihould conclude their defence with a Won mi r4cord.o. plc.rning Chronicle.] Our R.eaders vri ill, see from our Report of the Proceedings of 'yegterday in the noise of Lords, that the great object for Which her ,Majesty!A Counsel contended,, has been gained,. and that , the House haVe s,greed 'to receive evidence with respect to the toilduct of:Vithicarti andßagauti. It had been ast;urned, that according to the ptactice o+! the Codas below such evidence was inadmissible blit it would rather . :a? pear front the answer of the• Judges to the question pro posed by Lord Erskine, that the practice of the ',Courts by no means warranted. this Assumption. But whatever might lie the praCtice of the Courts .11 ordinary cases, bet Ween private indivi;luals, the exklusion of the evidence in question .would, here have been unjust in the extrme. This is an anomalous and extraordinary case in every reSpect, The prosecuting party bursts upon ns in•every possible shape, and. an active agency has appeared, which can be leg all y connected with no party the , House of Lords can a cknowle g e. The King of Hanover, for instance, can be no party in this business ; but who can,suppose the king of Hanover to be insensible, to 'any thing that concerns the King of. England ? We have a ccordingly seen the .agents of the King of Hanover busily e mployed in compelling witnesses to come to this country. coz:ce~ has 1 a nd t