The Sun. — London, England, 1842-02-03 00:00:00

MONEY MARKET end CITY NEWS FROM THE MORNING PAPERS OF THIS DAY. TIMES.—The premium On gold at Paris is 7 per mile, which, at the English Mint price of 3/. 17s. 100, per ounce for standard gold, gives an exc h ange o f 25 . 32 . and the exchange at Paris on London at short being 25. 47k., it follows that gold is 0.62 per cent. dearer in London than in Paris. By advices from Hamburg!' the price of gold is 4291 per mark, which, at the English Mint price of 3/. 17s. 1 Oid. per ounce for standard gold, gives an exchange of 13.7 i, and the exchange at Hamburgh on London at short being 13.91, it follows that gold is 0.87 per cent. dearer in London than in Hamburgh. The course of exchange at New York on London is 109 per cent., and the par of exchange between Eng land and America being 109 23-40 per cent., it follows that the exchange is 0.57 per cent. against England. But the quoted exchange at New York being for bills at 60 days' sight, the interest must be deducted from the above difference. CHRONICLE.—When the report was first spread abroad, that the Duke of Buckingham had ceased to be a member of the Cabinet, the funds were unfavourably influenced ; but now, when an interval of nearly three weeks has brought *hut the event, the national secu rities have shown no sympathy for the patriotism of his Grace. It has, however, given rise to a variety of new sliding scales, and produced a perfect " bobber?' among the City friends of Sir Robert. They affect, to be sure. to look upon the split as a matter of no consequence ; alluding to it with assumed indifference, and assert ing that the Duke of Buccleuch will answer just as well. But this is all outward pretence. They fear the effect which the announcement will produce in the country, and look with conscious alarm to the imme diate meeting of Parliament. One notion they have got hold of, which the more knowing ones of their ranks touch upon with a species of cunning leer through the tail of their eyes, is, that it is all an arranged affair—a mere mock resignation to cheat the country. The trick is to be, that Sir Robert Peel will introduce what they call " liberal measures," and pass them through the House of Commons, in order that they may be smothered in the House of Lords by means of amendments to be there moved, and already agreed upon with the Premier, by his Grace the Duke of Buckingham, and other Noble Lords. The estimate which the City monopolists have formed of the morality of their Parliamentary leaders, must, indeed, be of a very low nature, when they could suppose them base enough to lend themselves to such practices. The City is full of reports, however, on the subject to-day, and some of them go so far as to say, that the new sliding scale will have a maximum- duty of 10s. per quarter only, instead of 15s. as formerly stated, and the minimum to be ss. per quarter. The retirement of the Duke of Buckingham has alle viated the fears which were entertained, for some days past, that Ministers would propose a tax on funded property, and led to a better impression regarding the ,state of the country. It is supposed that the Govern ment have really seen the necessity of recommending some useful change in the Corn and Provision lawi, and of lowering the tariff on articles of general consumption. POST.—Accommodatio n was obtained on more easy terms to-day, namely, at three per cent. on the security of the home stocks. This favourable change in the state of the money market, coupled with the purchase of some small accounts by the chancery broker, produced a rally of about per cent. in prices, and the effect extended to both markets, the foreign as well as the home. No anntitmcein'ent has yet been made respecting the payment of the trifle of Spanish interest on the accrued • dividends. Senor Romp is certainly very circum spcOn, his 'movements, 'but he has possibly reasons for delay with which the public generally are little acquainted. We hear that the French syndicate resists the three per cent. scheme, and if such be really the fact, another interval of at least six months will be consumed in negotiation and arrangements ; but there can be no doubt the syndicate would be right in discounte mancing a measure the effect of which must be to bring down the value of the Active Bonds to a figure most con vet:lent to the Spaniards in the purchase of the national properties, for this is assumed to be one of the leading secrets.' of the Gamboa contrivance. LAW INTELLIGENCE. c 0 (Le T OF QUEEN'S BENCH, Feb. 2. THE QUEEN V. THE EASTERN COUNTIES RAILWAY COMPA. NY. UDGMENT-MANDA X US. Mr. Justice COLERIDGE gave the judgment of the Court in this case, in which the Commissioners of the Pavement of the parish of Christchurch had applied for a mandamus against the Company, ordering them to comply with the provisions of the local Act regulating the p h •vement of the parish of Christchurch. It appeared that th,l Railway Company proposed to erect an arch across a street in Christchurch, for the purpose of carry ing the 11 a ilway over it, and that in doing so they pro posed to tv,i'e up the pavement of the street and to relay it. The C. w,mmssioners denied that the Company had 'Y right toy a; ter the pavement at all ; and the Company replied that the v proposed to make their arch sixteen feet high, a tld &it the descent to be made in the pave ment in conse quem„ e of the relaying would not exceed One foot i n twenty, ;v hi c h was i n accordance with the provisions of tLe Uailw,„'Y Act. The Court was of opi nion the altertio ik an , posed to be made by th e Rail way Cantpa,ny was not p - f a nature as to come within the meanin g if •i • • - pronbni.m ,9t the Pavement Act—that the return to ,the rnandaz was good—and therefore judgment must given fornus leferldants The Court they proceeded the • ceeded t o hear arguments and cases in the new trhil Paper, but not , ofpublic tug any interest occurred up to th e t i • me of min going to Dress. 2 COURT OF E XCHE QUER , 1, THE QUEEN v. Tuotices. This was an information . filed by tbe Atter ne , N , Oeneral against William Thomas. The first comae" ' 16 0 th nnshipping 383 gallons of foreign brandy, .Imitheizt the payment of dutf; the second count charged brat with having received the brandy; and the third count chae i iod with haring harboured and concealed the same. The Arroarrzy-GENERAL, in opening the case, sta' ted , ti n it the offence with which the defendant was charged h: b eft committed in the town of Newport, in South Wales, on the 11th March, - 1841. On the north side of the British Channel there is a riper called the Uske, which runs up to / qewport, luad there is a small stream called the Ebbw, that falls into the Vtke near its junction with the British Channel. A , ; a short glistaems from Newport, at a place called ogwenlly, th " ' it ch Eataled fur the p r orpose of guardi pg 640- COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Feb. 2. WRIGHT V. KING. This was an action for false imprisonment. The de fendant is proprietor of a boarding-school, and the plaintiff, being for a short time in his service as cook, was given by him into the custody of a police-officer, and taken before a Magistrate upon a charge of felony. The charge was founded upon the fact of 10Ib. weight of suet having been found in her cupboard. Before the Magistrate the plaintiff declined to prosecute, and the plaintiff, who received an excellent character from her former master, brought this action for the alleged in jury. The Jury, after a brief deliberation, returned a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, 10h COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, Feb. 2. IN RE WM. HITCHCOCK. The further investigation of this matter was resumed ,his day. The cross-examination of Mr. Gladstone was continued by Mr. Mardon. You have stated in your examination of 26th January that your last transaction with the bankrupt was the 12th July, 1841; state what that transaction was ?—Be fore I answer that question I should like to explain that I made a mistake in a date relative to interest. I stated 1838, and it should have been 1839. Mr. MARDON repeated his question.—lt was a small parcel of goods amounting to 1/. ls. 4d. sold by me to the bankrupt. When did you sell any goods to the bankrupt prior to that date ?—On the 30th June or Ist July. Can you state the amount ?—I believe upwards of 1001. Then did you sell any goods between the Ist July and the 12th of the month beyond the sums mentioned ?—I think not. Were you in the habit, prior to the Ist July, of supply ing goods to the bankrupt weekly or oftener ?—Yes. When did you credit the bankrupt in your books with the 8632 Bs. 9d., Heeles' bill ?—On the 18th May. Did you make the entry on that day?—Without doubt, as it appears in the book. •My question is not as it appears in your book, but when the entry' was Made ?—On the 18th May. Did you credit his cash account on that day with the amount, 'or was it carried to his cash account ?—lt'was carried to his cash account. You have spoken in your examination of an interview with the bankrupt on the 2d of July; did the bankrupt then inform you that he should stop unless you afforded him assistance and unlimited credit ?—No., Do you recollect what statement he made to you on that occasion ?—I do. Will you state what then took place ?—He stated that . we did not give him sufficient supp or t ; th at we di d ' no t answer his referenc es in a way tcrdo him credit, and having a large account with us it was an injury to him. You:have stated that you sent to the bankrupt on the Ist-July a letter stating that his buyer had been very hequently with you, which was contrary to the under standing; referring to the loss of the sth May, which had been acknowledged by the bankrupt in his letter of the 28:h May. Do you mean by that answer that there was any understanding between you and the bankrupt in May that he should instruct his buyers not to call upon you so frequently ?—No ; I wish to observe we then advised- him to buy with great caution, which he pro mised to- do, and these purchases made in June ' we thought were too large to be consistent with that pro mise, especially as the trade of the season was so ad vanced. Seeing - that this bill was drawn in February, 1841, in cluding interest, at the rate of 7 per cent, upon 7,0001., is that such a bill as one pf your clerks would obtain with out the directions of yours&ifor Mr. Cooke ?—No, it would be by direction. Do you mean by your direction or that of Mr. Cook? —Yes. I want to know is it probable that you or Mr. Cooke knew that that bill was obtained, and with interest at the rate aforesaid? --Yes. Can you explain why, if there was no arrangement in June, 1840, nor afterwards, that you took the bankrupt's acceptance in.. February for interest on the 7,000/. at the rate of 7i 'per cent. ?—.I cannot explain w hy, b ut i t must have been agreed either then or before. It is right to ob serve that this is the only instance on which 71 per sera. was takep, and that the average of all our transactiens from the commencement of 1839 up to June. 1840, do not exceed 64 per cent., and the Bank rate of int erect during part of that time was 6 per cent. Was no t the bankrupt discounting with Mr. Glaister in 1839?-4 do not know. You' thiLve stated in your examination of the 26th of January last, that as the bankrupt had shown by his stock ta'king of January that he had a balance in his favour cif between 3,0001. and 4,0004, this, with the amount you meant to write off would enable him, with prudence, to carry on th e b us i ness well. Now look at that sto c k taking, and state whether or not it appears that the, debts are taken on the credit side at 2,7001. ; premises, fixtures, &c., 6,000/. -, alterations, 1,0001. ; house at Torrington, 4001., whether or not it does so appeuz,•, making a total of 10,1001. ?---It does. Now do you really believe that by writing him off 2,500/. he could, with prudence, be able to manage his trade well, seeing that those assets were unavailable for the purpose of paying his engagements ?—Certainly, be carise we also told him that we would continue to lend hi in the 7,000/. Had you not previously agreed to lend that sum for seven years or a longer period ?—Certainly not. Are the premises and fixtures mentioned in the Ex hibit A, the same premises that you offered to sell for 1,5001. ?—Part of the premises we offered to sell for 1,5001., but the bankrupt told us on the 13th of July that the portion we held was of little or no value without his brother's, an.d to which the fixtures and plated glass of all the other 3 are added. We held two leases out of the three, but without plate glas s an d fi x t ures. 1 - 10:d not the alterations and the additions of plate ? . sglass alluded! to bees4nade since January, 1841 ti ieve the alteration commenced some months previous to that time, rend was completed about that time. Are you no t aware that your firm sold to the bankrupt a large parcel of goods for the opening of the premises in March, 11;41 ?—Upon the strength of this account (A) I have now got before me, and the confidence his brother had Li his affairs, having given us a promissory note for 7,0001, after satisfying himself upon the affairs of the bratkmpt. You have stated that you would receive back a par cel of linens from the bankrupt, to be re-finished ,on the 17th of July. . Are these linens entered in your book ? —They are. Will you produce the book ?—They are, to his credit. Under what date ?-14th of September, amounting to 6471. Os. 3d. By whom was that entry made ?—The clerk who kept the books. It is right to explain why they do not appear till the 14th of September. The linen had been packed and sent to Ireland for the purpose of being re finished, v.nd was afterwards sold there at a reduction, and after the sale, when we ascertained that reduction, the goods, were credited. Is it ttie habit of your hOuse to sell goods first and enter ti,ein afterwards ?—lt is not the habit of our house, 'except in such cases as these, because we cannot aseerte.in the reduction. When were those goods sold, and to whom ?—They were . sold from about the middle of August up to about the d ate they are entered. Cita you mention any one person by name ?—Holman. and Ha.rris of Cranbrook. but I cannot call others to mind. Have you any entries in your books of such sale ? Certainly. They are all entered in the books. Refer to your books and point out the dates.—lt can not be done without great inconvenience. M.T.HUMFREY said he did not think it important. If it were worth it Messrs. Cook and Gladstone should pro duce th, P.m but it would b e a great trouble as 'there were no less I ;hal eight journals. Was that the only reason that you had for the under standing between you and the bankrupt ?—Yes. Do you consider that the 'season was far advanced in May in the retail West-end trade ?—My answer refers to the Ist July. Why, when you wrote this letter, May 5, 1841, did you caution him against keeping too much stock ?—Because we had heard he had been buying goods freely in the market. Did your caution against buying too much stock apply to yourselves, your own firm ?—lt did generally. Mr. HUMFREY—What do you mean by generally ? With respect to ourselves and others. Mr. Kim:Kw—Did you caution him not to buy of other houses on the sth of May?—Our caution was a ge neral one, meaning that he should do business orA as small a stock as possible. What amount of goods did the bankrupt, purchase of your house after March 16, up to and inclusive of 12th July, 1841 ?—lt appears to me, looking at the book, to be 2,0801., without returns, which amount to 1801, leaving the actual amount 1,9001. What amount of cash and bills did the bankrupt pay to your firm during the same period ?—The 4th April Mit; the 18th May to Heeles' cheque 863/ ; on the 20th 750/. ; on 29th 1,0001. ; on Ist June 525/ lis. 6d. ; those are all. Do you find nothing on June 4th ?--That bill was not paid ; those I have mentioned were. The different bills falling due up to 4th July for goods were all paid, but by means of our own advances. From what time up to July —From March. Can you point out what bills were paid by the bankrupt without advances of yours ?—I don't think I can tell without going through the books. I can tell the whole advances of the year to the bankrupt. I can explain the payment of each bill by going through the books. Before you part with that book will you look if you did not receive a bill orrApril 4th, 1841, for 2261.3 s--No. Neither to his goods account nor his cash account ? I seem to have no such bill here, but this book will not show, it does not go far enough back. Referring to a letter of the sth May, 1841, you say the bankrupt is warned from expecting any more assist anue from you, beyond, for a time, the 7,0001. and Mr. Cooke's 3,0001. From what time did you mean the assist ance of the 7,0001., which refers to the joint promissory note of the bankrupt and Mr. Geo. Hitchcock, to continue. —The 70 0 1. was lent to be paid at the rate of 1,0002 annually. NW ~iw~/ ... all who with ourselves remember the long and T venue. The officers at this station thought, from circum- Then do you mean it was for a term of seven years?— The loan of 7,000/. was for the term of one year ; faithful career of the Noble Duke, his ta -6,olovobLe When e w s a e s c second slid so oz on ient , lents, zeal, and energy—and beyond these, ; Mstanarccheslawsti,lietihi at th s e o y m o e b s s m er t ; g d lio d;r !. in tt g em th p ; w da o y ol o d f p t v h ob e ab l l l th tai c c i e f In sundry sums in his unspotted character—all devoted to the ?Place in the evening. Their suspicions being thus excited, they they . .N.fay, 1840. 4 ' ' • Was there . not a . joint note of the bankrupt and George = best interests of the people, and, through this p roceeded vessel lying near, from which a party who had horses and carts' devotion, so eminently contributing to purify and ' in readiness, Hitchcock of the officers, the brandy was seized, and in the had been removing brandy. The party fled at given for that amount, payable twelve months restore the Conservative party—all who remem - after date, and dated the d e f en d an t, William Thomas, bad been seen in the Ist June in that year ?—Yes. her these claims of the Duke upon public confi- the approach meantime the neighbourhood under the circumstances which sh ou ld b e When the bill became due in 1841 was it presented for dente would view with dismay his Grace's payment ?—Yes ; I suppose so. secession from a Ministry which we believe to Edmund Frost was, then called and examined by Mr. Do you know of your own knowledg e who presented detailed in evidence. Jervis--Witness is a tide-waiter at Newport. On the evening that note for payment ?I do not. g be the best that Parliament can afford, were the secession founded upon any differ- of the 11th of March last, he made arrangements with Mr d Britton to roceed to the mouth of the Ebb w. He did , * _p s o up y p o o u se b s e o li . eve that it wa s presented for payment ? ence in principle. For ourselves we will onarriving li there he heard the sound of voice w s • froma vessel so at an a not disguise the truth, that in a difference short distance. He then returned to the watch-house, crossing My question is whether you believe it was or not ?,-- of principle between the Duke of Buck- t the Ebbw by the bridge over the turnpike-road. When he My belief is that it was presented, and another bill was ingham and Chandos, and any other statesman crossed the bridge, be perceived William Thomas, ttid e ß e li e b tb er e t s Th of o i ns l ; ti i l t was then after twelve o'clock at night. obtained. To whom ?—I suppose both to the bankrupt and his or number of statesmen, we should scarcely heel- and were covered . with mud ; %Vil- brother. fate to take our part with his Grace—so high is Th Liam Thomas perceived the witness at the time. Proceeding By whom ?—I can't tell. farther on he met a sailor. On arriving n the vessel he What reason have you for supposing it was presented our estimate of his sense and patriotism. On the other side, the enem i es o r t h e Conservative found a quantity of vessels filled with brandy, which had been for payment, seeing that you cannot tell by whom it was cause rejoice at the e vent, as proof of divi- seized by other o ffi cers, and two carts and five horses placed presented ?—Because another bill was obtained. By whom was that other bill obtained ?—I don't know. sion in the Conservative ranks, and feeling by e a r n ° 3s adjoining .ex a m in e h d e d b g y e . Mr. Mee—Witness did not speak to the all the value of the Duke's connection with any Witness ba d Thomases he n n ot he be m e et them. It was moonlight a t th e id time. Have you not heard from one of your clerks that he Government, exult in his retirement from the called upon to pay cost n s toin a any troublew woman, b u t presented the note to the bankrupt for payment ?—I nave no recollection of it. Cabinet of Sir Robert Peel, as a symptom of its young o Was any part of the 7,000/. paid off in June, 1841, approaching fall. There is, however, no reason fault.but he was not in for fear upon the one side, or for exultation on the Ri c h ar d True was next examined—Witness is a tide-waiter. when you o bt a i ne d, as you say, another note 2—No , other. The difference between the Duke of Buck- H a e re m h et las th t e at preeddi ng witness on the evening of the 11th of because the bankrupt was then applying to us for the about seven o'clock. When they arrived near renewal of other bills. ingham and Chandos and his late colleagues is not the shore they heard voices from a vessel . lying . adjacent. Wit- Did you see the second note ?—Yes. a difference of principle, not even a difference of ness rcet the brothers Thomas, while he was in the company Then did it not occur to you to inquire why the sum principle in thelowest detail in which principle can of Frost. of 1,0001. was not paid off, as agreed to be done annually? be possibly involved ; least of all is there such a dif- John Smith Phillips stated that in March last, he vas —I knew the reason. The bankrupt . had then applid Terence as can divide the Noble Duke from the Comptroller of the Customs at Newport. At about eleven for therenewalofother bills . owes with which he has hitherto acted, and which o'clock in the night of the 11th of March last, he went to the Did you grant any, and what, -. renewals at the time mouth of the Ebbw, accompanied by other officers. There Owes so much to bins. The retirement ofthe Duke when the second note was given , as have stated 2 p w ar as ti a es ve w s h se o l lLi a n a g a i e r d i th it e fireivler, Theltt o a n ifi li ce is rs aigr e o n ac s h a i i n a g ed it the unpaid. ou is his own act, an act resolved upon by him in IA No ;it appears the moneys ar s . till y opposition to the earnest and an anxious re- 120 kegs of brandy, all of which except two had been broug ht lig t What moneys do you allude to as still unpaid, being monstrance of his brother Ministers ; and it i s ashor e ; an d a l so upon f i ve horses and two carts. the subject of r enewa l i n J une 1841 ?—The bill falling simply a sacrifice to personal honour—to a feeling John Britton stated that he was a landing waiter at New- due the 4th June, of 1,0001. ; one 4th July, 9991. It is Eon. Witness accompanied Mr. Phillips in the seizure of the right to observe the bankrupt obtained the moneys from that a public man ought not merely to maintain brandy, as stated by the preceding witness. Later in the night us at these times to pay the bills becoming due. his professed opinions firmly, as long as con- Wavhere any other bill than that for 1,000/. renewed witness boarded the vessel. Three of the crew were then en scientiously he can, but also obviate the sus- board. He seized the vessel and brought her into port. in June 1841 ?—There does not seem to be any renewal picion of abandoning them upon any unworthy The condemnation of the vessel, of the brandy, rid the horses of bills, for we lent him money to take up the bills. consideration. This is a determination which and carts, were then proved. Was it not agreed between you, the bankrupt and must command the admiration and gratitude of tb James D o a_vis stated that in the themonth of *arch last he wu t pet Mr. G. Hitchcock, that the note of 1 9 ,000/. should riot be r e v e e r gi f ste th v e in sc t h b oe e n p e r r e c o te in d g.h ß nu os a e vy .. His all, how much soever its effect in the particular on e H . n w a r s e a w l : th - , negotiated?-=I have no recollection of it ; but we do not ease may be regretted. How much of disgrace Master of the vessel. Witness remembered a person in New- negotiate such large sums. would have been spared to public men, and how port of the name of Rickards, who made an appointment Did you keep it in your cash-book from June 1840 to much of evil would the country have escaped, if with him at an inn in Newport en the 18th of January. June 1841 ?—Yes. all public men had always acted in the spirit of t H h e e totltiTho Ri ckards sad Lt William Thoma.s o at e the i nn . Rickert When did you give it to your clerks, or any other person for presentation ?—Doubtless when it became due. this determination ? We may easily suppose master of the m nooner a w t i tt ess Ci w u as tom t -ho .maWitonesselomaned Will you swear that you did give it to any person to that Whig-Radicals cannot understand the con- the vessel bouts ne or ten days after. The brothers Thomas prese nt for payment to the bankrupt or Mr. George duct of the Duke of Buckingham and Chandos. agreed to pay him 51. a month. He told him he was to go to Hi tc hcock 2—.1 ,do not recollect that I gave it to any COURIER.—Last night's Gazette affords the France and bring brandy home with him. Witness, after person, but have no doubt it was presented in the usual first proof, and we hail it as an auspicious corn- - having had the vessel repaired at Plymouth, set sail mencement, of the Colonial Secretary's labours for France, having with him John Ellery, Robert wa y: Did you not write a letter on or about the Ist of June Piers., and John Wilcox. When he had arrived near to the . bankrupt, stating that that bill p in the promotion of colonial prosperity and of would not be re the French coas he rec e ived his register from Ellery. colonial immigration. Although the re a- They bought in France , at the po r t o f R em o; near Ch er . rente d for payment, and that another would be present ratory steps announced in the Order in Council beurg, a cargo of brandy, amounting in all to 135 kegs. El- ed for renewal ?—I think not, but I have no recollection for facilitating, and therefore encouraging, lery was the purchaser. They made for Newport with the of it. brandy, accordin g io the directions witness had received from Will you swear that you wrote him no letter on June the immigration of free Indian labourers into the Mauritius may be considered as Robert Thomas. When they got near the mouth of the the Ist, in which another bill was inclosed for his Eb bw signa- River, between eight and nine o'clock, on the evening ture?—l do not remember. the main trunk of ' the great scheme for of the 11th of March, the y went ashore, where t h ey found five Will you, swear that you did not do so 2-1 will not carrying out colonial emigration on a large scale, or six persons wa i t i ng for them. Among them was presumed for some ti me past to b e i n the con- Thomas Rickards, who went on board with witness. swear that I did not d o so, b ut I have no recollection. If teznplation of Lord Stanl e y, if no t a l rea d y su ffi - Wi tness b elieved that two more of; the party were it were so, it wou ld h ave b een a very natural course. ciently perfected i n it s d eta il s to b e la i d b e f ore the br o th ers R o b erts , b ut h e could not say positively. Did you, or y our c l er k b y your direction, present such Parliament, y e t as one o f t h e o ff s h oots of such Ellery had b een l an d e d on t h e prece di ng morn i ng for the pur- a note to the bankrupt for his signature 2—l am not se of giving notice of their arrival. Witness never paid any aware of it. larger scheme it may be accepted as initiatory pos e of giving notic of their arrival. Witness never paid any aware of it. larger scheme it may be accepted as initiatory thing for the schooner, and no price had ever been agreed on Have you seen the sec ond note referred to?—Yes. Of whom did you obtain that ?—I have seen it in our evidence that the whole question of emigration between himself and the Thomases. will at length be embraced, grappled with The witness was cross-examined by Mr. Hill, but no new bill-box. fact was thereby elicited. energetically, and, we doubt not, all its From whom did you obtain that note?—lt was doubt- John Smith P hillips t was recalled , v and deposed to the sign- less obtained from Mr. Geo. Hitchcock. lam not aware manifold difficulties and complications mas- • of th e registe r ;; gi se v iz e e n d t w o as D 2 a 2 i s s . . Bd W . a itnes s stated that the tered by the manly mind now fortunately v m al g ue of the b r an dy ga llon, and the whole that I obtained it. presiding over the Colonial department. cargo was worth more than 400/.Have you any doubt upon it—was it obtained by your The example of what is now done for Mauritius A letter was then put in from the defendant to the Board of knowledge ?—I have no doubt upon it, by my knowledge. we take to be of good omen for the cause of im-• Customs, praying that the horses seized on might be restored What do you mean by my knowledge?—l have stated migration in the West Indian colonies. We flatter to him, as they wer e hi s property, and had been employed in from the commencement that I do not know distinctly the_service in question without his permission. how it was obtained, or words to that effect. ourselves that this is but the first of a series of This was the case for the Crown. Have you the first or original bill for 7,0001.?—No. measures by which the interests of those colo- Mr. HILL then proceeded to address the Jury for the defence. wb leY n h t a b t e h o a t s be b r ec n o ,e m s e o o b f t a it n e ? d — . I suppose it was given up flies, and those of the magnificent colonies of The evidence against his client might be reduced to two heads : Great Britain at large, are to be relieved from first, there was the evidence of those witnesses, who stated that Have you the second note now in Court? Mr. HUMFREY—I believe not, but you can have it in their present state of depression, and again re- the defendant bad been seen by them in the neighbourhood in isth shalloul d like be sentto s f e o e n i t - . whi l c d h n thwt goods had been seized ; but such a circumstance stored, reinvigorated and flourishing, to the rank action.coi ot l i b n e a r n e y w w a s ay n i e i x ro t v t e he th e a v t i l d l e e n w en a n s i implicated4; i i a t t h w e trans;witn ess five minutes. Mr. MARDO they once held among the first elements of na- Mr. HUMFRE N IT— I tional greatness and wealth, when the "ships, however, could not say that the defendant was present on the colonies, and comm erce " o f G reat B r i ta i n were night in question ; a n d as to t h e account w hi ch he gave of the Mr. MAROON continued —What rate of interest in previous arrangement between himself and the Thomases, the J 7, u o n o4 e 1.?1-84I0,amwnasot a n gr w : r e e d o t f o an b y e . gi ven upon the loan of the boast of the land and the ehvy of the great Jury would receive with considerable distrust the evidence of agreement being made :et the time, but about if per cent. was afterwards given. Napoleon. a man who was himself within the fangs of the law—who aes Rasnt . afterwards. r a a f tn t e e o r o w rf a a i tnredt interest rfeis was that had wade his disclosures with the whole weight of the , Custom-house pressing on him, with the Attorney-General upon the top of it. Putting the evidence on the highest There h o lv W e n r t he h h n t t d e i r d es t t h s e p n ec o i t fi e ed. purport to carry ? ground, it amounted to no more than a case of general suspi cion against the defendant; but positive proof to criminate him Was the sum of 525/.. 12s. 6d. accepted for by the bank- Thewas entirely wanting. ATTORNEY-GENERAL replied, and Lord ABINCER rupt on the 29th day of February, 1841, at four months? It is very unlik e l y : t h ere i s no such day. The bill was charged the Ju r y a t some l engt h . • The Jury, after a few moments' deliberation, returned a ver- received by us on F e b ruary 22d, and due June Ist. diet for the C rown . Was that sum paid "when the bill became due?—Yes. An agreement was then come to between Counsel that the But I here wish to observe that that payment, as well as other brother should not be proceeded against, on the under- f o o n r or two others i n th e month of May we held security one or that the joi n t p ro p er t y s h ou ld b e held liable for the - payment of the 600/. f o r w hi c h t h e ver di ct had been obtained. " Then do you mean that the 5251: 12s. 6d. falling due June Ist, 1841, was not solely for interest for that loan of 7,obOt?—lt was for interest. Did any, and what arrangement, take place between you and the bankrupt as to the rate of interest of 74 per cent, to be paid on the 7,0001., and if so, when?-1 am not aware of any arrangement, but 7f per cent. waspaid. Seeing that the note was drawn on the Ist of June, 1840, for twelve months, can ydu explain why it was that in February 1841, you charged him 7 per cent.. and for which he gave you his acceptance ?-1 cannot ex plain it, but I l enow 7 * per cent. was paid. Did you give directions to Mr. Parkinson in February 1841, to obtain 1 per cent, upon the 7,0001.2—1 have no remembrance of it. Do you know the hand-writing of this, Exhibit V ? Yes, it is Mr. Parkinson's. ,4..: Read it—One year's interest on 7,000/, at 74 per cent., 525/. ; stamp, 12s. 6d. Having seen that memorandum, are you now certain that you have no recollection of giving any directions to Mr. Parkinson to obtain the bankrupt's acceptance for the amount ?—I have no recollection of giving Mr. Par kinson any directions, but itis quite possible I might. Do you superintend that department of your house which relates to the cash and bill department?—Not ex clusively. Do you at all interfere in the matt er , so as to g i ve you knowledge of what bills are drawn on your customers ?—I do interfere, but many hills are drawn without my know ledge. After a short conversation between Messrs. MARDON and HUMFREY the subject was dropped. Can you explain why those goods which you received for the purpose of being refinished were not sent away for that purpose . ?—I can ; certain expenses would have bee'i incurred for freight, and I told a salesman that if we could get certain prices for the goods th e y m i g ht s ell them, if not we would send them to be refinished: When did you give your salesman those directions ? I think, about the middle of August. Would the expenses of freight and refinishing amount to 1501., or thereabouts ?—No ; many of them were de preciated in value. Have you stated at any time that you gave the bank rupt credit for these goods on the 16th of July ?.—No. The invoice was dated the 16th of July,• and from the invoice the goods passed into the book. The time they passed into the book was the 14th of September. The note for 7,000/ was here produced. You have now before you the promissory-note refer ring to it, in whose handwriting is that note ?—Mine. Having that note before you, and having stated that it is in your own handwriting, have you any recollection to whom you gave direction to obtain the signatures of the 'parties thereto 2—l have not: Thereis an exhibit marked A., dated N0v.24,1841, does that paper contain your. account with the bankrupt up to the date of the fiat, and does it contain on the credit side of that account these words—" July 16th, 6-17/. 03. 3d. ?"—lt does. It carries the date of the re turn. invoice, but the credit was not given in our books till the 14th of September, because we did not know the amount of the redaction till that period. Does the word return refer to the linens 2—Yes. How could you give credit in that statement before you as from the invoice for 647/. only, when the invoice itself shows the total amount of goods to be 8081. 15s. 3d. ? —Because it was necessary to make a reduction in order to sell the goods. How could you, seeing the goods were sold in Sep tember, give credit in that account, filed in these pro ceedings, for 6471. Os. 3d. ?—I could not ascertain it till September. Why did you date it July ?—lt was taken by our clerk from the invoice, which was dated July 16. Did your clerk ascertain the credit of 6471. Os. 3d. from the invoice, which amounts to 8081. 15s. 3d. ?—He did. Can you say whether the statementA was furnished by your firm to the official assignee ?—The statement was furnished to the assignee. And when ?—I cannot answer. Can you state of your own knowledge, or from infor mation received from any other person, whether that statement was not delivered before the middle of Sep tember ?—The fiat was opened the 16th of September, so it could not be. Refer to your book, and state whether, under the date ' of the 4th April, there appears any payment, and what, made by the bankrupt to you P—A bill. for 2261 3s. fell due on that day, and also one for 102/. ss. 6d. • Will you . efer to May 4 ; does any entry appear ? Yes, 2031.175. 6d. Is there any other following May ? —ln May, 481.95. ; June 4, 591. 18s. 6d., and a 100/. Bs. Were the whole of these payments made to you, without your assistance ?—I thihk not ; the bankrupt received from us 1,0001. on May 4, and 1,000/. from us on June 3. Were not those receipts by the bankrupt from you May 3 and June 3, had for other purposes, and not for the pay ment of the bills above mentioned?—l see there are bills becoming due, one for 1,000/, on May 4, • and one of 2,0004, June 4, which may account for those sums which I 'have mentioned. • Were not those other bills paid by the bankrupt without your assistance ?—lt appears so. Did not the bankrupt purchase from you between March 16 and July 12, amounting to the sum of 1,9084, or thereabouts ; and did he not pay the sum of 4,378& 13s. 30. during the same period 2—Yes, I suppose so ; but the money was found by ourselves. Did you supply any sum of money towards the sums of, on April 4, 5001.; May 18, 8631. ; May 29, 1,0001 ; and June 1, 5251. 12s. 6d.?--I think not ;we held other securities to cover these accouhts. Have you received from the bankrupt those several sums a d o fysoouol. securityB63 f l u ,O r O t t e , saunmd 0f 52 5 1 / ;0 1 0 2 0 s 1 . , 6 0 d u . t.)e92 ?=Yes.Hth of May ?.:—Security for that amount is disputed. Had yon security for the sum of 1,000/. ;—Mr. George Hitchcock. admitted we had, but that is disputed. • Do you consider that you had security for that 'sum from Mr. George Hitchcock ?—We do not. You have stated that you held security for that 1,0001; state from whom you held that security, and the nature thereof?—No, I said it was disputed. What do you mean, then, by ymir statement, that you held security for all these sums ?—I am not aware that I said I held security for all these sums. I endeavoured to explain it at the time. Did you hold security for the 525/. 12s. 6d. 7—Yes, I Conceive we did, for it was the interest of the joint pro m issory note of George Hitchcock and the bankrupt. Then did you consider George Hitchcock liable to you fox that sum of 5251 12s. 6d. ?—We did, as he was a party to the promissory note. Do you hold any guaranase of George Hitchcock for that sum of 1,000/. ?—We do, which he disputes. When did you receive the letter marked A A ?—ln August, 1841. Was that letter, when you received it, in an envelope ? —Yes. Have you the envelope ?—We have not, we never pre serve envelopes. Was not that letter written by the bankrupt at your request, and dated back to July 16, to accord with the invoice of the linens ?—Certainly not. I requested a note to be written authorising us to make a reduction. Did yon not tell the bankrupt to put that letter in an envelope, in order that the date might not differ from the post-mark ?- —Certainly not. No such thought ever entered my head. When did you first perceive that that letter bore the date of the 16th July, 1841 P—l cannot tell. Have you any r ecollection ?—None whatever. When did you receive the letter, Exhibit R ?—I think in August. Did yon, when you so received it, observe the date of that letter as the 15th May ?—I did. Was that also in an envelope ?—lt was. Have you preserved that envelope ?—I said I did not preserve envelopes. Did you, in the month of A ugust, as k t h e b ankrupt to take back that letter ?—I did not. I said to the bank rupt we ought to have had a l etter respecting the non payment of this bill, without being mixed up with other matter. When did you first observe that it was dated back ? I think, on the receipt of it. Had you received any other letter from the bankrupt in which he had mixed up the subject of that letter of the 15th of May with other matters ?—We reeeitrecla letter on the Ist of May, in which other matterS 'Were mixed up, and to which i referred. Was the subject of that letter of the 15th of May men tioned in the letter of the Ist of May ?—Not precisely. When was the letter, Exhibit S, date sth of August, 1841, 'ivritten by yen ?—The sth o f A ugus t When did you reosive the letter, Exhibit T P-1 have no doubt we received it on the 19th of August, or the morning following. Did the bankrupt see you in your library with Mr. Buzzacott on the 20th of August, 1841 ?—Yes. Did he then enter into any arrangement with you for the liquidation of your debt ?—Yes he gave us a gua rantee on that occasion, which, at first, we refused to take thinking it might be con s id ere d a pre f erence. Did not Mr. Parrinton call upon you in September, and inform you that the bankrupt had requested him to come in and take an account of his affairs ?—I think not. I think we sent to Mr. Parrinton for that purpose ourselves. Did not Mr. Parrinton show you a letter written by the bankrupt, requesting him to see you on the state of his affairs ?—I have no recollection. Mr. SOLE, solicitor to the assignees, Brown and Llewellyn.—When and how was the 7,0001. advanced ? In May 1840, May Ist, 700/ ; 2d, 6501.; 4th, 3,0001.; 14th, 800/.; 25th, 4001 moneysl want on to those kn daysow whether ?-We youi id. actually advanced the Now, were those advances made for goods had front you ?—No. Do you mean to say they were made in hard cash ? Yes. They formed no portion of the previous account, we agreed to advance the whole 7,000/ on condition that his brother should first satisfy himself of the safety of his affairs. We agreed to assist him if he would do, away with the small wholesale trade which was dan gerous and unprofitable. The COMMISSIONEIL—What did the bankrupt owe you at that time ?—I cannot tell the amount. .. Did you receive any large payment soon after this advance 2—No. Was there any agreement to pay the previous ac count out of this loan ?—No. Ly Mr. SOLE.—How do you know that George Hitch cock looked into his brother's affairs 2—Because we first requested him to do so, before he became security. :1 -- Did he tell you that he had looked into his brother's affairs ?—He told us he had satisfied himself, and, there fore, he should become security. had2d questionyloo ke is, did Go dinto oh, his sbro e til i e -ge H r,saff it a e i h r e s. ot tell es you ,orn that he no ?—He did irbe In di In May, you first ay, lB4l,see George about the end Hitchcockofthe on month. o e sub ject of the security ?—About the middle of May. Will you state as near as you can what you said to him, and what he said to you ?—I can give you the ti substance.ine.l l told George cannot the at p this c e distance u f tb o e f bankrupt that he (the bankrupt) had received different sums of money from us lately for his trade, and that we would take his security for the amount of 7,000/., which the bank ru pt sa id h e req uired, on conditio n th a t h e should first look into his brother's Affairs, and satisfy himself that he was doing well; also that he should con tinue from time to time to do so, to give satisfaction, on these condition, that the bankrupt should discontinue his small wholesale trade, as I have mentioned before. Did you tell G. Hitchcock, when he was proposed as security, that a portion of the sum had been already advanced ?—We You say you advanced the bankrupt 3,0001. on the 4th May ; now on that day there was a bill due ; I want to know whether you advanced that amount without any reference to any previous transaction, and whether 2,0001. of that sum was not paid to that bill 2—lt does not ap pear in our books. 11OFFE, for having fraudulently, and by misrepresents- whether there was any body present who could seak to tion, obtained a quan tity o f goo d s from Mr. J. Carren. ! the goodness of his character ? p It appeared that the opposing creditor was a wholesale ! The prisoner said he believed there were several per boot and shoemaker, and the insolvent purchased a large sons in the room who knew it to be unexceptionable, quantity of lhots and shoe:: from him, fel- which Lill of , and exchange was given. Almost immedi a t e l y afterwards peorance stepped fans ard, am: declared t h at the prisoner the insolvent mad e over th e w h ole of his property, and hw e had been school-fellos, but could g i ve no ac amongst which was that he purchased from Mr. Carren, I count of the subsequent proceedings and character of the to his daughter, in lieu of an alleged loan from her, and accused. then called upon him (Mr. C.) and got a further quantity The LORD MAYOR (to the prisoner)—This won't do. of goods, for which it was stipulated that re a dy money was I have every reason to think that you are one of the to be paid, but the moment after the bargain was closed swell mob, who seem to direct their particular attention Mr. Carren, being called by another customer, the insol- to th e pl un d er of women . I find that more robberies vent - walked away with th e goo d s, an d now in his defence have been of late committed upon females than used to said that he was under the impression that he bought be the case formerly, and I shall do all I can to bring them on credit. thieves who practise in that way to exemplary justice. Mr. Commissioner BoWEN; after commenting strongly Let me know where you live, and by what means you on the conduct of the insolvent, ordered him to be re- support yourself ? The prisoner —I'd much rather that manded for eight months. your Lordship would decide about me at once, without IN RE DAVID ROTTERICII. requiring to know anything more. I decline saying any This insolvent was opposed on the ;round of having more. vexatiously defended an action whereby his detaining cre- The LORD MAYOR—Very well. You are committed ditor was unnecessarily put to additional expense, and to take your trial. The COURT ordered him to be remanded for three The prisoner, who had been lately in Bridewell, was months. then committed for trial. lie belongs to a very respect able family, and has been for some time discarded by them. IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE DUDLEY. The insolvent was opposed by Mr. Cooke, on behalf of Messrs. Souter and Paistow, solicitors, of Greenwich. The grounds of opposition were that the insolvent, who was a very eminent engineer, had been formerly in the employment of Messrs. Grissell and Peto, with whom he had some disagreement, the result of which was a lawsuit, in which the opposing creditors acted as the in solvent's attorneys. Ile was arrested by a person named Hart, and the Learned Counsel contended that they had been intimately acquainted before, and that the arrest was termed a friendly one. Mr. Commissioner BowEN considered there was no ground for that supposition, and ordered the insolvent to be discharged forthwith. CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT. .OLD COURT. RAPE.—John Luterich, a painter and grainer, was in dicted fur a rape on Jane h.eep, a married woman. It appeared from the evidence of the prosecutrix, a rather good-looking young woman, that the prisoner and his wife, and the prosecutrix and her husband, resided to gether in a court in Hanway-street, Oxford -street. That on the 26th of January she met the prisoner on the stairs, by the door of the front room on the first floor. He showed her some artificial flowers, which he had in his han,l, and upon her saying she thought them pretty, he said he would buy her soma, He then seizerl her by the waist, drew her into the room, threw her upon the floor, and effected his purpose, the prosecutrix vainly calling for assiaance, there being at that time no other person in the house. The greater portion of the prose cutrix's evidence was unfit for publication. Mr. CLARKSON, who appeared as Counsel for the pri soner, cross-examined the prosecutrix at considerab:e length, but failed to shake her testimony in any particular. The husband of the prosecutrix stated that he ob tained a warrant against the prisoner, who was the • landlord of the house in which he and his wife resided. Mr. CLARKSON addressed the Jury at some length on behalf of the prisoner, and called several witnesses who give the prisoner an excellent character fur propriety and decency. Mr. Baron ALDERSON summed up, and The Jury, after a short consultation, acquitted the prisoner. Joseph Payne, 38, was convicted of burglariously stealing various articles, the property of William Thomas Webb. Look at this pap er 2—This refers to an ad vance, and not to a bill. On referring to the books, there w as a bill due on the 4th May. What I want t o k now i s , w h e ther that money was ad vanced to take u p th at bill ?__lt might have s o b een ap- - plied, but our bill-book is not here, but it can be had in the morning. It being now past four o'clock, they further examina rion was postponed till to-morrow. This was one of those cases of robbery unhappily too frequent, and which nothing but caution on the part of the public can effectually prevent. The prosecutor and his wife left their home, on the evening of the 10th of January, and when they returned they found the house had been entered, and a quantity of property stolen. The prisoner was, happily, stopped by the policeman on duty, and a part of the stolen property was found upon his person. Baron ALDERSON, in passing judgment, observed, that really some protection must be given to that class of persons of the community who, from their circumstances, were compelled to leave their property during their tem porary absence, without the protection of servants. The Court was bound to protect th e p u bli c from the proceed ings of such persons as the prisoners, and the sentence, therefore, was, that he be transported for the term of ten years. (Before Mr. Justice CRESSWELL.) William Metcalf, 23, and Alfred Hastings, 27, were indicted for burglary, and stealing various articles the property of Thomas Uheveley. Mr. PAYNE conducted the prosecution, and from his statement and the evidence that was adduced, it appeared that on the sth of January the prosecutor, who resides in Jubilee-place, Stepney, went to bed, and in the dead of the night he was awoke by hearing a noise in the lower part of the premises, and on getting up he found that a door had been forced open, and the lower part of the house completely ransacked. An alarm was given, and the police, who were readily in attendance, made a search, and the prisoners were discovered secreted in an adjoining stable, and part of the stolen property was found upon them. The Jury found both prisoners Guilty. Mr. Justice CRESSWELL, after commenting upon the facts of the case, sentenced the prisoners to be transported for ten years. Charles Brook, aged 19, was indicted for breaking into the counting-house of Messrs. Kitson and Co., soap boilers, White-street, Southwark, and stealing money to . the amount of 351. Mr. PRENDERGAST conducted the prosecution. It ap peared that the prisoner had been in the employ of the prosecutors, and on the 19th of January he had an opportunity of seeing Mr. Kitson place some gold, silver, and notes, to the amount mentioned in the indictment, in his cash-box, and the next day it was found that the counting-house had been broken open, the cash-box forced, and the money stolen. It was proved that, im mediately after the robbery, the prisoner set about " enjoying himself." He took up with a lady, went about to various places of amusement, and was at length taken into custody by the police while in a state of intoxication, and charged with being "drunk and disorderly." The inquiry that subsequently took place led to the committal of the prisoner upon the present charge, and the offence was clearly brought home to him. The Jury found the prisoner Guilty. Mr. Justice CRESSWELL ordered the prisoner to be kept to hard labour for twelve months. The prisoner said he should be glad to be sent out of the country. Mr. Justice CRESWELL told the prisoner that it was very probable, from the course of life he pursued, that he would eventually be sent out of the country, but at present he would be imprisoned in it. (Before the RECORDER.) A man, named John Baker, was charged with having tried to break the windows of a bullion shop in the neighbourhood of Cornhill. The fellow was seen to give three punches with his elbow against the glass, which happened to be particularly strong, and resisted the at tempts successfully. After being takers into custody, he said he was very poor, and wanted to get a handful of the Spanish gold coin, which looked so tempting inside. The prisoner was sentenced to hard labour in Bride well for two months. MARLBORO UGH-STREET. An elderly man, who gave his name Thomas Slee, but whose real name is supposed to be Beville, was charged with stealing a Hamburgh sausage from the shop of Mr. 13adcock, grocer, 14, Marylebone.street, Regent. street. Charles Clarke, porter to Mr. Badcoek, said the prisoner came into the shop under the pretence of purchasing a small quantity of tea, and took a German sausage from the counter, which he put in his pocket. The prisoner was about to leave the shop hastily, when he was stopped, and the sausage found on him. Mr. MALTBY asked the prisoner if he had anything to allege in defence? Prisoner—May it please your wors hi p , t h ere are three points in thi s case I wish to argue. First, I contend the shop keeper had no right to spread sausages on his counter, because, being placed in such a prominent situation, they formed a bait to entrap the unwary and hungry. Secondly, I did not take the sausage out of the shop, therefore a case of felony cannot be be proved against me, as it is necessary, in order to sustain such a charge, that the goods should be removed from the premises. Thirdly, by the porter stopping me so soon as he did, I had no time allowed me to repent. Had I been left alone my con science might have smote me ; and I might have returned back and made restitution of the article stolen in a moment of temptation. Mr. MALTBY replied to the three points, and held that none of them in the remotest degree obliterated the charge ; and as it was advisable to learn something more about the prisoner, remanded him till Monday next. The constable said he had been informed the prisoner had at one time possessed nearly the whole of the Alpha cottages, Re gent's-park, but had lost them through indiscretion. UNION-HALL. On Tuesday Mary Corsfield, a tall docent-looking female, with an infant in her arms, was charged with throwing herself into the Surrey Canal on the preceding night. Policeman Whitlamb, 89 M , stated' that while he was on duty near the Canal-bridge, in the Kent-road, on the previous evening, about seven o'clock, he was informed that some per sons had thrown themselves into the canal. He immediately repaired to the spot, and seeing a person struggling in the water immediately under the bridge he ran to the house where the drags are kept,• but owing to the difficulty experienced in procuring them he ran back without them, and perceiving that the person had sunk, and must inevitably be drowned if an attempt was not instantly made to prevent it, he pulled off his great coat and jumped into the water at a place where it was of great depth, and succeeded in rescuing the defendant, whom he brought oat of the canal in a state of insensibility. She was conveyed thence to a house contiguous to the spot, where the visual remedies for producing resuscitation being resorted to, she was in a short period of time sufficiently recovered to be enabled to be sent home. In answer to Mr. T rail I, as to the cause which induced her to commit such an act, her reply was, that she had been for sometime past living under the protection of a man who latterly treated her with great cruelty, and kept her and her infant starving., while he was out drinking. Mr. TRAILL said that he must have security that she would not repeat the attempt, upon which her mother stepped for ward, and said that some difficulty would be encountered in getting bail, and that if the Magistrate would permit her to be discharged, she would not make such an attempt again. Although the defendant now carried an infant in her arms, vet it was necessary to state, that she placed it on the banks of the canal previously to throwing herself into the water. Mr. MAUL said he should commit the defendant in de fault of possessing the requisite sureties ; and that her impri sonment would, at all events, give her an opportunity o f breaking off all connection with a man whom she admitted had driven her to the dreadful alternative of attempting to comm self-destruction.—The defendant was then committed. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, Jan. g. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN PLOWMAN. The insolvent's discharge was opposed by Mr. Woos• John 1)olin, 40, was convicted upon two indictments of obtaining a quantity of lead from Messrs. Warner and Co., by means of forged orders, purporting to be signed by a person named Bidwell, in whose employ he had for merly been. The RECORDER sentenced the prisoner to be trans ported for seven years. The prisoner begged for mercy. He said he had a wife and six children, and was in great distress when he committed the offence. GREENWICH POLICE. Tuesday Mrs. Mary Hewitt, wife of a master waterman, residing in Greenwich, appeared to a warrant, obtained against her by her husband. The defendant appeared with her head bound with a handkerchief, spotted with blood, and was ac commodated with a seat in front of the bar. Mr. J. Hewitt, the complainant, said the conduct of his wife' was so outrageous that he could no longer endure it. She had repeatedly threatened to destroy him, by throwing vitriol over him ; and several times had flourished razors (one in each hand) over his head, vowing she would take his life. Their matrimonial differences had been often brought under the notice of the County Magistrates, and at their suggestion, a deed of separation was drawn up, and he was relieved of her company, on allowing her Bs. per week. On Sunday morning he was awoke whilst in bed, by a noise of glass breaking, and on getting up he found the defendant had broken six panes of his bed-room window. He got up and found she had obtained access into the house, where she vowed she would remain, threatening if he touched her to bury a razor in his heart. It was stated by Harris, the officer, who served the war rant, that on taking her into custody, she went into a fit, and afterwards, on the road to the station, she fell down and cut her forehead. Whilst in the cell she attempted to commit suicide by cutting her throat in two places, with a penknife, and ultimately she went off in a strong tit that lasted two hours, and required six men to hold her. A more violent woman he had never seen in his life. Mr. May, solicitor, who appeared for the husband, advised him again to separate from her, and the complain an t o ff ere d her Bs. a week, togeth er with a room of furniture, fur that purpose. Mr. May had just inquired of her if that would suffice, and the defendant ( who evidently had a desperate struggle to re strain her feelings), had just replied " if I don't have better health, it won't," when she fell, as if struck with a shot, from her seat to the floor. The officers of the Court immediately raised her, and con veyed her in an inanimate state to the outer office, hen nearly half an hour elapsed before she returned to consciousness. The Magistrate ultimately allowed a private arrangement. THE CONVICT DEHAHUNT. Since we last adverted to the situation of the unfortunate man, Delahunt—no change has taken place in his condition. He has not been visited by any of his family, and his demea nour is quite calm and composed. His general health is good, he eats and sleeps well, his attention to his religious d u ti es i s unremitting ; but his laudable disposition to prepare hi mse lf f or the presence of his Creator is unaccompanied by any indica tions of terror, as the time of his execution approaches : on the contrary he evinces the utmost resignation to his fate. His present place of confinement is a fine dryroom in the hospital, where he is removed from observation, but, from whence escape would be impossible. One of the turnkeys of the prison and two men are in constant attendance on him during the day, and those two men sleep with him in the room at night, and, on being addressed by them, he cheerfully joins in their conversation. When he was first removed to the apartment which he now occupies, it was merely intended as a substitute for the day-room, and the practice was to remove him to his sell at night; but this was found to be an inconvenient mode of disposing of him, as there was not sufficient accommodation in the cell for his attendants, and he now o ccup i es b ot h day and night this comfortable and spacious room in the hospital. The prisoner is treated with the greatest humanity and kind ness by Mr. Allison, the Governor of the prison, and the fol lowing anecdote will serve to illustrate the extent to which his attention to the wishes of the wretched man has been carried. On the occasion of his mother's visit ; the prisoner expressed a wish for some cake-bread, and with a natural feeling to mi nister to his wants, she at once complied with his wishes. The former deemed it inconsistent with the strict surveillance which he felt it his duty to exercise over the prisoner, and was reluctantly obliged to forbid the introduction of this cake into the prison ; but he caused a cake of the same description to be prepared and given to the prisoner, of which he partook most heartily, and observed that he never ate anything that he liked better in his life. His general dietary consists of bread and coffee for breakfast—bread, meat, and broth for dinner, and an extra pound of bread and tea for supper. The Rev. Mr. Campbell is most constant in his attendance on him, and has, we were informed, expressed himself highly satisfied with the manner in which he conducts himself. He attended Divine service yesterday between eight and nine o'clock, and his de portment during the ceremony was marked by the attent i o n and decorum which he has i n vari a bly d is pl a y e d since his awful doom was pronounced. For some time after his conviction h e was very unwilling to encounter th e observation of his fellcw prisoners, but that feeling has now altogether vanished, and he no longer shrinks from meeting them. Having expressed a wish to see the prisoner, we were intro duced to him in his apartment. When we entereti he was sitting at a table, with his bead resting on his hand. He was reading a religious book, and was so absorbed in its contents that he did not appear to notice our presence. MURDER OF THE ITALIAN. The Governor in an interview with the prisoner on Satur day, referred to the last statement made by him, and which was published in the Register of Monday last, and questioned him as to the correctness of that statement, and particularly the part of it that had reference to the murder of the Italian. He reminded him of the solemn manner in which his father had urged him not to leave this world without making a full disclosure of his offences, and suggested, that as the public anxiety respecting the murder was most intense, he ought to attend to the advice of his parent, and, if he knew anything of the transaction, at once avow it, and thus for ever dispel all doubt and suspicions on the subject. The prisoner having made no reply to this exhortation, the Governor then begged he would turn the matter over in his mind, and he said he would. This would lead to the inference that the prisoner has something to disclose in relation to that diabolical deed ; if not so, why evince any hesitation of manner, but at once declare, as lie hail previously done, that he knew nothing of the matter? -D7aViii -itot of Monday, The RECORDER told him he did not deserve commise ration. In whatever state of distress he was, it could not justify the acts he lead committed. On the 7th of January he had, by means of a forged order, obtained property to the amount of 171., and on the 9th, two days only having elapsed, he presented another forged order, and obtained more property. The Court could • not, therefore, pass a more lenient sentence ; and he would only observe that the sentence was the lowest period of transportation that could be inflicted, when it was very doubtful whether the punishment ought not to have been the highest fixed by the law. The RECORDER, after the prisoner had left the bar, observed that the Legislature had thought fit to make a distinction in the punishment in the case of parties convicted of uttering forged orders for the delivery of goods, but he could not see what difference there was be tween obtaining goods and money to the same amount. Both offences were, in his opinion, equally injurious to the public, and mischievous in their consequences. The son of the last prisoner, who pleaded in the name of Thomas Lake, was then indicted fbr an offence of the same description. The case was clearly proved, and the Jury returned a verdict of Guilty. There being good reason to believe that the prisoner had, in some measure, been seduced to commit the offence by his father, the Court inflicted the lowest sentence lin accordance with the Act of Parliament, viz., two years' imprisonment and hard labour. NEW COURT. John Duncan , a, youth aged 13 years, one of the ser vants of the 1-,,0na.1a Parcel Delivery Company, was convicted of stealing a parcel containing fourteen alma nacks, and oth e r articles, ,+•l3e property of Michael Jereden and others. The parcel i n ' question it appeared had been direct - al by the prosecutor to a gentleman at Putney, and for the purpose of its reaching its very Company, where destina tion it was sent to the P a r c el Deli . it was obtained by th e p r i son er. There were seve ra l other similar charges against the prisoCer. The Learned Judge directed him to be tried on one charge, for steal- ing a parcel containing money, on which he was con , victed on clear evidence. gr. Justice WILLILis sentenced the prisoner to six months' imprisonment and hard labour, the first and last week to be spent in solitary confinement. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION -HOUSE A well-dressed young man, who si,`lted that his name was James tewart, was brought befor o the Lord Mayor, charged with having robbed a lady- of the name of Rock of a sovereign and some silver. Mrs. Rock stated that as she was walking front the Borough of Southwark over London-bridge, the pt - sonar, who was accompanied by another man, put his hand to her person, and with amazing quickness, capa ble of being exercised only by a clever practitioner, emp tied her pocket of all her money. Although the act was so likely to create alarm in a female, Mrs. Rock made a dart at the prisoner, collared him, and held him until a policeman appeared, into whose hands she placed the thief, who was astonished at the energy of his victim. The LORD AYOR—Are you convinced that he was the man who robbed you? Mrs: Rock—There is not the slightest ' doubt of it. I saw his hand upon my pocket, and I never stirred my eyes from his person until I gave him into custody. ` The prisoner said that the lady was quite in error, for he was quietly proceeding over the bridge when she seized him, to his great surprise, held, him fast, and ac cused him of having robbed her. 12,e never thought of such a thing as a robbery. The policeman stated that he fotr ad nineteen shillings and sixpence in the prisoner's pocko t but no gold. The prisoner having persisted it .1 declaring that the lady cm: Pitted a mistake, Ilia Lordship asked him Tim N Ew PyBLICATIONS.--We are re quested to :tate that the following interesting by Mr. Colburn new works are just published , of Great Marlbo rough-street, and may now be had of all B oo k se ll ers :- 1. The first volume of Madame d'Arblay's Diary and Letters, price 10s. 6d. bound, with Port ra it an d F ac - Similes. 2 . Madame de Sevigne and her Contempora ries, 2 vole. small 8v0.,•215. 3, H unter ' s Narrative of the late Expedition to Syria, under the command of Ad miral Stopford, 2 vols. small 8vo„ with Portraits and other Illustrations, 21s. 4. The Court and Times of Frederick the Great, edited by Thomas Campbell, Esq., 2 vols. Bvo. 28s. 5. Captain "one's Five Years in India, 2 vols. small Bvo., with numerous Illustrations, 255. 6. Lieutenant-Colonel Maxwell's Run through the United States, 2 vols. small Bvo., with Portraits, 21s. 7. The Hon. Mrs. Damer's Diary of her Travels in the Holy Land, 2 vols. small Bvo., 255. And, 8. Miss Lan don's Life and Literary Remains, 2 vnls. slag B vo , , 218, MORNING SUN THE SUN, LON DON, IT II URSDA Y, FEBRUARY 3, 1842. MORNING SUN STATE OF TRADE. (From the Manchester Guardian.) , prove • MANCHESTER.—There was net the slightest im mePf, in 1;i , ; dei•- cry lov,-est , .o4 o ' s known, kith a tendency to further decline. sc 'te, articles. The country trade is also, we regret 14) d exceedingly inactive ; and loud complaints are heard by all sides of th e sma ll amount o f . business DOW doing the parties engaged in it. was yery IIITDDERSF IELD MARKET, FEB, I.—There,te little change in the state of the market; at P.) 7 11 7,1 1 it was no worse—perhaps even a little better,' f 01 .7.„d e . there is ample room. In fact, so indefinite and in f scribable is the state of trade, that the diifieuN ne o . honestly reporting the markets is any thing but (Isl- la cure. 'Trade is bad, destructively bad ; and it is v er y to expect a p ermanent i ni p rovemen t until l a absurd and suicid a l fi sca l system i s rev Olutiouir A f o r abolished altogether. There is a demand, certo o o l a large amount of g oo d s ; but the prices aret:et that. were it not for temporary existence, it were d oe to cease manufacturing. It is pitiable to icu u , te f t beir the fall of many hone s t tradesmen, in despite of ill persevering effort s to weat h er the trying long ROCHDALE FLANNEL MA RKET , M OND AY, JAS. ~,,, - i fie i We have had today a very d u ll mar k e t ; the b us r; done has b e en ver y li m i te d ; and pr i ces, as 'usuu. te - r; tremely low. W oo l h as b een very li tt l e i nqu ired a' prices stationary. LLOYD'S SHIPPING. LONDON, FEB. 2.—Wind this day at noon Weitt ri iiciVe" DEAL, FEB. 2.—Wi n d A . M . W . N . W ., F. 01 4 Arrd. South Stockton. New Zealand. Arrd. from tr and sld. Bengal Merchant, Madras ,• Broxbourneberi m iuratt bay ; Mary, Barbadoes ; Beatrice, Trinidad; Prial b o oed , Bermuda ; Torould, New York. Sld. the outwaril except Anne Eliza, for China. fsbl i ' ro LIVERPOOL,. FEB. I.—Wi n d N.W._Arrd. Joel China; Virginia, North Carolina, New Orleans. !," : psige" Ray, Monte Vid eo . Th e G reenock, from NewpoP' Port Lynas this afternoon in tow of a steamer. ,t,iflel tilh OFF DOVER, JAN. 31.—A rr d. L a d y Seaton, nieiors' with loss of t o p mas t, sa il s , b u l war k s, &c. Feb. l• May, Mauritius. aft 1 1,11. PORTSMOUTH, FEB. 1. —Wi n d N.N.W. to N. -- A ,a` - Pel t ' jesty's ship Rapid will nail for Sierra Leone on Thttiv." 7 after post. COWES, FEB. I—Arrd. Antinio Pereira, Havannell' , ater' ~d SOUTHAMPTON, FEB. I.—Sld. L a d y Mary 'v.,- es Gibraltar. FALMOUTH, J AN . 31.—Wi n d S .W. to N. W,, sto breezes —And. Florence, London for Madeira GUERNSEY, JAN. 30.—S1d. Charlotte, Havannah• GLOUCESTER, FEB. I.—Arrd. Reindeer, Odessa. Jule NEWPORT, FEB. I.—Sld. T rewart h a, G ib ra ltar; ~, Constantinople. A n A mer i can -b u i lt boat, 21 'vet 10ng•176-01 green inside, b o tt om b oar d s red, outside bottom whips> black topsides, was pi c k e d up on t h e 20th ult., off the SWANSEA, JAN. 31.—Arrd. Michael Williams !. Ct bi , DUBLIN, JAN. 31.—The L eonora , h ence to lAntlil's. ashore at Kingstown on the 26th inst., is leaky, and charge. ) 0 Coax, J - Wag" JAN. 30.--The Colonist, bound to Trim" put back, with stanchions sprung, and other damage- b i t iplir SHIELDS, .lAN. 31.—The Argus, of Newcastle, 11. fr ashore near Tyn emou th, was got o ff this afternoon. 00 0; HULL, ' He, FEB. I.—Ar r d. F a i r fi e d, S t. J o h n ' s, New 13 r d o 1 ", VESSELS SPOKEN W ITH .—Th e B rown Lon , d Mauritius, out 18 day s , f rom t h e Downs, lat. e. 4, Anne, Miller, bound to Sydney, New South Nov. 28, lat. 36, S. ; Harmony, Clyde to Calcultr thel94h. Verona, Newcastle to Calcutta, Oct. 31, lat. . 37 ',00 the Juno, arrived at Algoa Bay. Enterprise, 111 40 0 " to Berbice, D ec . 31, l a t. 32 , l on. . 55 ; Ar i eh , rick (schooner), and Messenger, bound. to New 110 24th ult., 40 miles S.W. o f C ape Cl ear, by ttlif arrived in the Clyd e . U n i corn, B oston to Mice 17, lat. 3, N., l on . 22 , W : Q u a tres, Freres Malt : St. Domingo, 28th, lat. 26, lon. 32 ; Warriniaut,, I 'l> verpool to Dem erara , 21 st ult., lat. 48, lon. 1 0,', Amphitrite, arrived in the River. f,) THE MARKETS.—(YESTERD'" 'l O CORN EXCHANGE. AA," The arrivals of Wheat since Monday have been'aul, good of Barley and O a t s . Th ere was scarcely say t b 4511 I in the Wheat trade. B ar l ey d u ll . Oats sol d very " former prices. Flour unaltered. COLONIAL MARKET. A Or p i Prices were sustai ne d f or most ki n d s of produce, alim, of goods refrained fr o m p ress i ng a l arge quant i ty f o r Aji the market was dull generally. The imports were frifr• TEA MARKET. • Prices of Fr ee T r ad e T ea were susta i ne d , an d a, fall sr , , existed at the public sales. The lowest rate of Conlt t sif you was ls. 10d. ; Company's, ls. 104 d, r A sh. 1 7, a veries keep large. TALLOW MARKET.. The operations in Russian were fair, and at full rats" o r 3d. on the spot, and 48s. 6d. for delivery in the two 119 , , A last three m on th s o f the year. The sto c k is large. - FRUIT MARKET. A fair business done at firm rates ; the best Vsilentis l r 365. per cwt. Stocks are light of all scats. COAL MARKET. Ships arrived since last market.day, 110. ; ' 1 Bell, Robson k Co. Hartley 19 0 Walls End Larnbton •••• , C ar ' s Hartley Holyweil Main l9 3 Walls End Russell's - He t ' '1 anfleld Moor 2l 0 Walls End Stewart's! . • ... West Hartley ...... West Wylam Wylam l7 0 Tennant' s Hartlepool.•••"' Walls End Hedlcy 20 3 Vi ctor i a Hartlepool • .•••• • ' . 1 9 Walls End Hilda. Walls End Northumberland 19 9 Walls End Seymour I s ees . i' d Walls End Perkins IS 0 Wal s End lee. ••••••'''e W. E. Brachlyll'sHettou 6 Walls End West Tees.... Watts Ems East lietton 26 6 Ph:4lW' Trader ..... • t ; Wall* End Hetton 28 0 • IRISH MA OLIN MARKET NOTE for RKETS. the Week • di ~ 4' 9 Wheat, per barrel `zi. stone... From e' '2O. 21 0 33 u 44 311 Bere 353 Barley ... l6 1n0ue.... 14 0 1,7 0. 517 Oats l4 stone.... 9 3 13 I Flour, per cwt 8at0ne...... 0 0 432 Oatmeal. S stone..... 11 6 14 0 ' :111 , Sold to Bakers only. 10,601 Cwt. Flour.-- ..... .... 10 0 24 0 s ok k. . .01 Average price .if Wheat and lour 55 •, Od PV t o fig ... ...from • .Fs. to to Secottub jl. Receipts of Flour, 10 966) mg. Sal" of Do. 11'6°1 I Trim& it is3s. Od• cm PRICE Or RIVIA Ds 1 4 4 I Quartern Loat ..... •X, 2 6. i Ha'a Staartern ...... 4 ~. i- COK MARKErIS.—an Wheat (prr 205t.)17 E Od a to3ss. o(l.ltiats per 145 29. t. . 64. 1 . a '', , ' toJr V 0 if arley (per 16 34 )11 6 1 8 0 ;Floor (per cwt ~... 7 - Oatmeal (per cwt.) .m...3, Od to 143 Od 0 Reef, 6d. to BlLL—Mutton sd. ti, Bd.—Veal, 4#l l t•l'v . Pork, 4d. to s(l.—Fresh ' Butte!, lid. to 12d per 4 PRICE OF BUTTER.coe°- To the Merchants. T o the 90. First Quality...." ........ S9s ...........................11 S:cond SI • ~...." 01 ....11••••••••.11•••• Third . 71 ....-..............(.•.*•* ` .. .8, 1 Fourth ...... ............. ...... ..... 60 ............,„...,... (.. o '. 4s Fifth Sixth ............. 50 ........,..,... w ...., ...... 0 ... 20 ...... .. ." ......... ... CLONMBLL M I. lt IC ETB....Jan• :31 b 1, 'Per Cwt. i d. t , 0 0 New Butter 9 s 6 . d Oto 9 . 9 . d o Haler (raw)........ • ••-• i u , ', 4° • Oatmeal 0 14 6 liaconPLgs.... .44 :: • i Rendereo Lard — 0 b 2 J tfead5............. .. .......... .0 Per BEL. d ~ Fleur, Second C4O I k tour, I Ii• rcia..... -''' il. f Household...— t` 38 01-- Fourims. IS - 0 Per Barrel, o 3apeseed ......... .....20 0— 0 I 13arlRy ......... ....... .16 .. Dere ' 13 0 (. - b‘e.Q ........- ' IV # ,OPO KILKENNY iu.A ItkETS. ~, , V . 9 Wheat s perbarrel)2Bs. Od.to 33/.0(1. Beet ',ler 1C...... Os. IN' .0 Barley 12 0 19 0 Alutten ............ 0 6 ' l a Lats. 14 0 15 U Pork ............... 0 ! ,1,7 1 Flour (per bag) 25 0 DiP 0 Vea' -............ 4 0 y, it , „" Butter(percwt.).,, 0 0 98 0 Cresh Butter ... o g v 0 ' Bacon Pigs 45 0 46 0 Vail Ditto ~....... 0.„ " Coals 1 0 1 2 Potatoes ,per st.i 0 v HAMBURI MARKETS , jeo MARKETS. , ~10 j r, AIN, „. les t o g ie I Barley, Meeklentv•srP' Ilts!",41 ; I -- Magdebttrgil••• jeo •lii 1------- Holstel'a ....... ... j 1 to i ti oderirruck ..... et. 141 Oats, Elder -- Idetk%enburg •'...p., to .li ---- 13 .,°Ii.tein ........ oft ~7,, --,„ - ula%and .......... . . f y I Beana . ease. kleeklenburg ••• ofi g, p Yd . 9terfO Buck 'Wheat ........... •••• (~K. t . , 4 6 Rapeseed, Hanover •!' Oa l e' Malt of 00 ON Tares ... ••." t oo Mar , ni)am ....".. : b 3/ Madras ........... .....•. " A i Steals .'.• b ' Domingo •.. •., .. '' " , 10 0 EE. ,IL if .. ' 1 Dcmingo .., ..... . 'I N I Ls Guayra. . 0 '... .. e ' Porto :Rico ..... ~.r"7s Ilarannah ..... ...... ....... A ./ Al Is P.% e l lscmunt.) .... 210 , ' Daum, 'White .• ..... AV' r Brown .... t .... ... ..isk r , Petnambuco, Wl ' ate Br4r•vn .. ,IS 'n, 2% to 2% r y _____ Wheat, Marks 396 to 510 --- Magdeburg 372 to 516, Anhalt, white . .f..32 to 516 1 red 372 to 510 ----- Brunswick 3:+6 to 51. -- Mecklenburg 363 to 510 - Polish .144 to 5.6 ..-- Holstein Rye, Mecklenburg -- Marks 264 to 3U. , - Elbing and Ko nigsburg 224 to 286 -- Pomeranian Anhait Carolina and Tennes see 7% to 9% con] 1 3eorgia. lst suit 7% 2d 6% 6%i 11 and 4th COF l 13 to 13% Batavia 4% 5% Sumatra —( Rio :A 5% Bahia 3% 5% SUGAR.— (Witl Havannah, White 3 to 2% Brown 2% 2% Rio, - White 2% 4 Brown Manilla. Brom L i. li-,,• - . ..: .# 04 , _....t.,,,4-_, ? ..._ c 1 - 1 . ~ . ; SILVER TEA SERVICYES.—A. - a; SA ,71,4 don',an d S o u p o p s o , sManufacturin gßanko r SE rilv e ,; : i sa n m di t , h s , u Nb mo .it I t t e en pi T e l l ik - e followmg SILVER TEA azid COFFEE SERVICE' 4 opposite t h Cottage Pattern is plain, standing on shell feet, tl ',4 € di coffee-pots with a flower ornament on the lids. T, : or Pattern is richly embcKsed with flowers and scro 11S. ' or, '' of either is new and elegant : , 1 , COTTAGE PATTERN. £ LI - KING E !AT )011 • .p .. 1 0 -.0 -1 n Strong Silver Tea-p0t..... 12 OiStrong Silver Teapot loft l' a Ditto Sugar Basin l 6 16 Ditto Sugat% - Ditto Milk Ewer. 410 Ditto Cream , 0 0 , >07, Ditto Coffee-pot. 15 0 Ditto Coffee-, f r **".it " o ssi Complete £3B 6 Corn'plete ,o; riO r Aiel A variety of upwards of fifty Tea arid Coffee P - ,; e ryi b leo be seen in the Show-rooms, where may be selected ,e , poly of Silver requisite for the sideboard or plate -chest. , 0....4, ~,,J!' of prices, illustrated with sketches of tLe various : irt.4 o o,. d tg and forwarded postage free to any ran of the 1 42:, - 3 ,:Orr:, B. SAVORY and SONS, No. 9, Cornhill, Lo I) si l the Bank of England. . BIRTHS. di s. lad!' - ' r On the 13th ult„ at Moneyglass, Antrim, WI i ,0. 1 tenant-Colonel Arthur Kennedy, of a (laugh or. airs. '. 41 7 On the 29th ult., at John-street, Bedford .rovr, ' ( toe of a son. On the 31 s t u lt., a t Berkele-a the lady or °.4 . nOy Al ' Smirker, Esq., of a s on . yquare„, gr g' On the I s t i ns t., i n Upper Bcglford-p lace , . Of.' Rasch, of a son . F, ,e,' On the Ist inst., a t Westbourn,!-pbace, —at°n-s ear ...----- Samuel Rose, of a d aug h ter. , II On the 15th ult., a t t i .i ARR e or 1 • 1 0 ner /Altar e resioen c ei. Minister at Frankfoe,,, the Rey. Charles T. Are , ildb t A iss Magdalena Mays, Ap- , bit of Heidelberg. only daughter of the late J. 1 Aself On the Ist : .nst. at the Church of the Ho!Y r_i n t , 9 „fial!:: the Rev. Martin john Lloyd, ALA. Dornestec Grace the D u k e of Richmond and Rector of. DeP,a 4 . 4 , crofts, Fulh am, tuo to Mary Ann, relict of the late K en rick Collets z' g P, • lk 'On the 19th u l t., Eliza - Efer the wit . * "" A " leh' •'0044 Esq., of Upper Thames-st reet : sil k' 14 "; On the 2ti t h u l t., at Ludiow Mrs. M wh ary .-° John Tknnas, Esq., of Gi'tth er id e aged 73. On the 30th ulf., Phill is, the wife of Johl‘ 7. 7.° Cottage, Nine Elms, age I 56. 0 iln V n4e; London : Printed and Published by halti.. , ,- - 0 , 1 4 Igtri,„"- t N b o e . C l o l u 2 n , ty S t o rn i t id a , t ie , s T a h: 031 cet} 4'° ..,..::"'"'A 0 44. Minds% 74101."7,7'•