The Sun. — London, England, 1815-05-12 00:00:00

INI PERI AL PA RLI A MENU. HOUSE dc LORDS, vt, MAY n. On eve question that the Prt4. - ,Er Tax Bill be read n third time, • • 'rice Duke of Nonvotx expressed his appro. liation of the Ist inciple of_the Bill, though he objected to some of the details. He admitted its Stecessity under the existing circumstances of the country, and particularly approved of the _Clause ;providing that the Act might be alteeed during the present Session. He hoped that hetore the next Session, if not during the present, Ministers would consider of some modification for the relief of the agricultural interest, upon Whom it pressed with peculiar severity. He was willing to arm Ministers in the present crisis, in order that they 'might put themselves in a posture to demand a safe and honourable peace. The Earl' of DARNLEY agreed in what bad fallen from the Noble Duke, particularly with re -gard to modifications in favour of the tenantry of the country. He approved of the measure as malting a heavier claim npon the proprietors of laud than upon other classes. The Marquis of Douotdis luiped at least to have - seen several modifying clauses introduced into the Bill, which he completely disapproved, which 'vent by Act of Parliament, to appropriate the property of the whole country. To-day Ministers might demand JO per cent. and to-morrow 99 per cent. It was peculiarly severe upon the tenantry, more especially in cases where rc-valuations were made upon leases every seven years.. Wig! regard to war, he m a intain e d that the House had been deceived by the Address which was obtained on •the 7th April, and telt inclined to-resisetothe last, hostilities directed against thirty millions of people, Avho would be compelled to fight for their exis tence. The Proclamation of Louis XVIII, was, in his view, mos; impolitic, partientaily in the assertion that the Allies would altOw to France no other King but him. He would not diVide the House,. hut he took this opportunity qfp Eo t es ti ng against the third reading of the The Earl of DARNLF.Y explained. lie did not mean his assent to this Bill to imply, that he was ready to arm Ministers in rushing into an aggres sive war with France. . The Earl of LIVERPOOL observed, that a con clrrence in the Property Tax Bill-oouldnotso be construed, since it was only to artil Ministers in ease of necessity. - He apprehended that the greater part of the nation would now support the pleasure, which was only objected to by the peo ple as an Act to exist during peace, it was only to be continued for one year, though it might he renewed with the consent of Parliament, which roultrnot be pledged, as it had been erroneously supposed to be by the last Bill- The Property Tax was in his opinion excellent, since whether it perfectly attained the object or not, it aimed at, all the great masses of property. The Marquis of LANSDOWN was decidedly of t;iat the House was pledged that the Tax si . iould expire on the - sth of April, after the con clusion of peace, and it was fit that such a pledge should be • gi-en and understoOd. It would re m, hi, at the eir! of the year, for the House to de cide whether this,•Tax should be continued or re pealed, and that decision would be governed by circonstiinces. Admitting that it was necessary that the revenue should be raised, which he did riot now mean to dispute, the Property Tax ap peared to him the best mode of procuring it. • The earl of LIVERPOOL explained. Earl STANHOPE proposed two Amendments, that• the - Schedules B- anal D should- be omitted, the.fist applying to the agricultural . ) itnd the last to the mercantile , intartst.--They were 'negatived. The Property Tax Bill was thenrread a third time and passed. The LORD CHANCELLOR, in allusion to the Pe titions presented against the Corn Bill, said that he should examine them to see if they were re gular ; and the 'Marquis of DOUGLAS observed, - that he believed there was nothing ill , tt►e,z , disre ---spectful in thought or expression. . - To a question from the Duke of 'Norfolk,. the Earl of Liverpool replied, that he einild - give no information regarding a Message froth the Throne. He sh-ould move that the House should adjourn to-morrow,' until the Thursday following. -Several Messages were received fron► the Com mons, after which the Houseadjokirned. HOUSE OP COMMONS. Mr. DROGDEN hariug brought up the Re' ell of the Coro- Inlttee of Ways and Means, respecting the funding of Exche quci• Mr. TIERNEY complained, that, misled by a let ter front the Chancellor of the -EXchequer, an uouuting that he would take SO per cent. many persons in the city had purchased Exchequer Bills. 'e consequence had been that they had risen in livite from a premium of 4s. to one of 12s. or 15s. la a few hours, however, another message had come down froth the Right lion. Gentleman to the City, to state that Exchequer Bills were not %ranted. They then fell back to their original price, and their purchasers incurred a heavy loss. The CHANCELROR of the EXCHEQUER explained, that the alteration which had taken place in his mode' cif proceeding, was in consequence of a de patation sent by the Gentlemen in the City to Downing -street. Those who had purchased Ex dicquerliills must not have been aware of the de- ' potation, and their loss must have been occasioned by want of concert among themselves. Mr. TIERNEY considered alai the'yekresentation ina d e by the deputation to the Chandellor of the Exellever VijAi an expart e and interested'state nient, and ought not to be attended to. Lord CASTEILEAGII gave notice that he should' move to-morrow that the House Adjourn to next Thursday. OP The qiiesti , n that the Alien Bill he read a third time, 7,ord SI'ANE - 101T-inade se , eral remarks upon the propriety tot* introtluaing parenthesis into Acts of Parliament, and pro terhal amendment, which was re:,.ected on th e ques - Curl put. 't• The Marquis of DOUGLAS 'presented Petitions from va rious parts of Scotland against tke last,tlause in the Corn sill. They were laid upon the Table. • • PROPERTY TAX., • CATHOLICS OF IRELAND. Sir H. PARNELL, on preEenting the Petition of the Catholics of Ireland, stated, that he had been infor►ned by the person, %rho hall placed the Pe ti:ioo in-his hands, tl►it the Catholics of. Ireland v,ere atixiptis the►t their case should lie submitted, to the discussion of the House. He should in Consequence grve . notice, that be should move this day fortnight that the House resolve itself - into a Committee, to take into consideration the laws of this country as they affected the Roman Catholic part . of his Majesty's subjects. He should this day week also propose some Resolutions, putting the House in possession of the whole extent of their claims, which he hoped would in courtesy. be allowed to be printed. Mr. TlERNEY.wished to know whether the•Pe. tition was from the whole Catholic body, in& it only from one part, from what part it came. Sir H. PARNELL explained, that the Petition was signed by certain Roman Catholics-on behalf of themselves and the Catholics of Ireland; As far as it was' possible to litio.w the expression of their sentiments under the restraints to which they were subjected, IA ith regard to meeting to gether, the Petition no doubt correctly and une quivocally disp'aved the general sense of the Ca tholic Body of Ireland with respect to the nature and extent of their claims. It was desirable that the House should be in possession of the exact nature and extent of what the ?lonian Catholics re quired from it. He would therefore submA his prol' positions in the shape of Resolutions, which would speak the accurate opinion of that Body on the subject of their claims,, so that should the Fipuse accede to those Resolutions, they would at the same time accede to the wishes of the Catholics of Ireland. J, C. HirptsLEy, after expressing his dis position to come to a conciliatory arrangement, reserved to himself the right of ',opposing the prayer of the Petition, as far as it went to claim unqualified emancipation. • Mr. BANKES gave notice,' that in consequence of the importance of the subject, he should; • morrow, move that the House be called over on the day the Honourable Baronet's motion, to re quire into the state of the laws respecting Romp , Catholics should come on. Sir H. PARNELL renewed his notice that 'this day fortnight he should make a motion on the present. state or the laws affecting the Voinan Catholics of Ireland, and that on this!da3- he would move certain Resolutions, showing qte nature and extent of their, claims. The Petition was then read, and ordered to lie on the table. • The Chancery Clerks Bill was read a third time and paSs : Vil. Mr. LOCKHART-moved for leave to bring in a Bill to re gulate the right of Freemen and Burgesses, to vote in elec tions for Members of Parliament,. for a time to be limited at ter their being registered. After some conversation between Mr. Tierney, Mr. We there!!, Sir M. W. !lidley, Mr. Lockhart,' Mr: Calcraft; Mr. W. ‘Vynne, and Sir John Newport; leave was given, the MU was brought in, read a first time, and ordered for a second reading this day fortnight. Mr. BENNETT that an Address be presented to, the Prince Iteg-t, that he would order an Account of the money expended on the New Building .in Windsor Park, with an estimate of the sum wanted to complete the same, to' be laid before the House.—Agreed.to. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER postponed the consideration, of the Report of the Committee of Ways and Means, respecting Stamps, to to-morrow ke'tinight, after some oltservations. from Mr. Tierney and Mr. Lockhart, the latter of whom suvested the propriety of laying additional Stamps on Bankers' Loral Notes, and 'aneretoing their facili ties of transporting- their paper from the coaatry to Commit. The t HANCELLOtt of the. EXCH,EQUER gave make, that to-morrow se'nnight he should call the attention of the I louse to a motion tending to establish a regular Packet to the East Indies. • The Irish Malt Duty Bill went through a Committee after some conversation between sir .iohn Newport, Mr. Vesey Fitzgerald, and Mr. Wm. Smith. The Report was ordered to lie received to-morrow. • On the motion of Serjeant ONSLOW, a Committee cOn sisting of Sir J. Newport, Mr. Win. ‘Vyime, and Scrjeant Onslow, was appoioted to inspect the Lords' Journals, and ascertain the proc ee di ngs o f t h e i r L ordships on the 13111 ' for better securing the Liberty of the Subject; The Irish Assessed Taxes Bill went thrQugh a Committee. Report ti:-morrow. The Report of the Committee on the Militia Amendment Bill was taken into - further consideration, and the Bill order ed to be read a third time to-morrow. The East India Judges' Pension Bill went. through a Com mittees Report to-marrows The Report of the Committee on Weights and Measures was received and agreed to, and a Bill ordered accordingly. The Report of the Committee on the Irish Jail Contract Bill was received, and the Bill ordered to be read a third time this day se'nnight. The Reports of the Committee on East India Silk-Handker chiefs, and Additional Duties on Excise, were severally re ceived and agreed to, and a Bill ordered orcurdingly. - A Message front the Peers informed the House that their Lordships had agreed, without any amendment, to the-Pro perty Duty, and Exchequer Funding Bills Bills.--Adjourned. PROTEST. Reasons for the negative' vote of Louts FLo- IcliN PAUL D KoRGQI(LaY, on the Act intitled "Act additional to- the Constitutions of the Em pire," -dated April 22, 1815 1 thiis it due to my fellow-citizens, and I certainly owe it to myself,. to state the reasons which have induced me to vote against the acceptance of the Act, intitulcd " Act additiobal to the Constitutions of the Empires." These reasons are. that the 67th Article of this Act violates the liberty of French citizens, inasmuch as it pretends to prohibit their exercising the right of proposing the re-esta blishment of the Bourbon Dynasty on the throne. lam coin.: pelted to protest against this Articlei because lam convinced that the re-establishment of that Dynasty on the throne is the only means of restoring happiness to the French. The experience we have bad of the practical happiness enjoyed by France during the Restoration, can leave no doubt with any man in regard to this; and the unanimity of the national wish in favour of Louis the regretted, is amply confirmed by the care which the Authors of the Article I reprobate have taken to interdict the manifestation of . this unanimous wish. The designed confusion which they have int ro d uced into this Article, by mixing up with it various unpopular phautorns, which have. no relation tolhe re-establishment of the Bour bon Dynasty, forms an additional proof of the geueral wisk of the nation ; it is only for want of real objects that phantoins. are evoked ; and the finest eulogy that can be given to'the. , acts of a Government is when its enemies are reduced to ac knowledge that the only means of rendering it • unpopular is . to ascribe to it intentions. I must also protest against the 6th art, of the decree of the same date, importing that " the act additional to the consti tutions shall lie sent to the armies for acceptance." It is con trary to the principles admitted among all civilised nations, to submit constitutional acts to the acceptance of armies.-- Among all free nations, among all nations who feel their dig nity, the armies are bodies destined not to vote on constitu tions, but to obey the national The moinent a nation suffers its armies to vile, it 'subjects itself to the worst of slavery.. This slavery sufficiently discovers itself in the sth art. of a id decree of the same date. This article dues nut. say that, according as the general summing, up of the votes shall be favourable or nut to the act additional to the constitutions, that act shall nr shall not be promulgated; but it says that the resalt of the general summing up of the votes stwall be proclalnied; and that the eat additional to the constitutions shall be promulgated. This strange certainty of success seems to me to speak a language sufficiently clear to be un derstood by - every one.. Does it not say ill effecte--" vote, great nation ; but while voting, conform toeTtiiemii,isiji‘ii:cstuio7'n given you; vote, not as freemen, hot a s jects ; vote, but forget not, that the vvishes. of the /why being known beforehand, the nation must ben ° t bay: °nets." As for me, I have not yet learned to take bayonets, for the rule of my conscience. L. F. P. DE KORGORLAV Paris, Apria 28, 1815. re t a h s .e o p us res it e i n the h gaper tyro pe r I this day gave a vote in the negative at the office of Pre fecture of the Police, and a.sasnifinoefdi;..l47 first sentences which follow, is merely the derelopenients SONS OF THE CLERGY. Vesttraay the Anniversary of the. Sons of the Clergy was held at St. Paul's Cathedral. The fineness of the day occasioned the - Cathedral to be exceedingly crowded with fashionable company. His Royal Highness the Duke of YORK, his Grace the Duke of DEVONSHIRE, the Right Hon. Lord Viscuuut PALMERSTON, attended as Stewards.— The LORD MA'YoR and Sheriffs of London appear , ed in state, attended by Sir IVATKIN LEWES, Sir JOHN EAMER, Alderman AINSLEY, tke The Ser mon was preached by the Rev.G. MATHEW, M.A. and Chaplain to the Right Hon. the Earl of BRIS TOL, who took his text front the First Epistle of ThesSalonians, chap'. v yerse 13. " Anil to esteem them very highly in love for their works' sako.., and be at peace amongst yourselves." From the Cathedral the principal Officers went in procession to Merchant Tailors' Hall, where a a sumpt u o us enterta i n n ient wa s provided, at which were, besides the company above mentioned : Archbishop of Canterbury; Bishops of 12huster, Worcester, Bangor, Salisbury, Exeter, St. David's, lie, etord, Ely, Peterborough ; Lords Rolle and Bolton; Sir G. Beck worth, Sir William Curtis, Sir Charles Fl o w e r, Si r Cl au di us JSlouter ; G. Byng, M.P.; W. Mellish, M.l'. COLLECTION. At the Rehearsal Sermon Rall L. 91 9 0 815. 19 fi 499 11 8 Total L. 918 0 LAW INTELLIGENCE. , COURT OF CHANCERY, MAY 11. MISNOMER. IN THE MATTER OF ALEXANDER LAIDLOW,, ALIAS ALEN. LAIDLAW, A BANKRUPT This very curious and interesting case came'on this day, upon an adjourned motion from the last term, and excited much wit and humour at the bar betwetm Sir Samuel Rot»illy, supported by Mr Mmktagu e for the tootion, and Mr. Leach, sa! , n agiiust it. mot;ot, yv as for an order to supersede the firs' Commissions sued out against the iu the last month, within a few days of c', :: ou the ground of prisnomer in the first in Nvhir:ll the sirname was made Laid . :.,stead S,f th?"true sirname Laidlaw,. which ;. , : , potters of the motiou contended, on the i.oritv Of mauy L.flidavits, was the real addition of the bank: opt, who liYed and traded long at Bull, in Yorkshire. 1 . ._ On the other side it was argued, that this was a - race ro.n . bv two Solicitors, who had each striven to have the whole profits of the Commission, the latter having - taken out without leave of this Court, in•the-self confidence that the name in the first Commission was wrong, while on the other side there were many affidavits produced, o spew that in Scotland, and the cantignotis parts of the North of England, the letter A was pronounced or sounded as 0, which constituted the difference. The LORD CHANCELLOR observed, that it would be difficult to find a Yorkshire Jury to give a ver :, diet upon such evidence of Scotch pronunciation in England, as, according to the old observation, the Scotch who came.Suuth of the Tweed seldom or never • recrossed it to Scotland, adding, that the observation of one of the'inlverse Solicitors, that he should have all the costs of the Corrimission or none, ant Ccesar ant would here fail, since, in the event of setting aside the first Commission, •no costs would be given. Mr. Leach contending, that such a practice should be discouraged by the Great Seal, as that of the Solicitor suing out the second Commission, without which the first would be valid, as the bankrupt passed by, and was ad : dressed.by, the sit-imam of Laidlot.v, in Ittters and bills of exchange, which he passed or negociated, as by the name Laidlaw. Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY, for the second commis sion, and against the first, denied that the evi dence of receiving - letters or bills of exchange, and replying to the letters in an incorrect name, or passing acceptances as they came, proved the assumption of sushi a name by the person addres sed, any more than the many letters addressed to and answered by himself, under the barbarous name of Rumley, changed his name to one which he deemed more ageeeable or dignified; contending that the party himself can alone originate the sumption or alteration of a name, which was not here proved, and of course the bankrupt would not be criminally liable under the name in the first commission on any prosecution, any more th an Mr. Law (Lord Ellenhorough) here quoted, could be responsible for a Mr. Low, who practises in this Court. His Lordship desired . t o rea d t h e affidavits, to see if he could decide this question without the ex p ellee of an issue at law to ascertain the reality of the name in question.--Judgment was post- . COURT OF KING'S BENCH, MAI- I. SEDUCTION.-BACON V. BROOKS. This was an action brought by a flow -stre e t Officer against a Carp en t er , for the seduction of the plaintiff's daughter. It appe a r e d- t h at t h e parties had long known each other intimately, as neighbours, at Kensington, and that the (Wen - dant hail .undertakenthe burial o f the plaintiff's wife. Upon her death the plaintiff's daughter Was obliged to quit a residence in Lord Holland's Lodge, Kensington, which she anti her mother bad et6oved in resp ec t o f t h e latter's serv;ces, a n d to go. to live with her father at the Goat In n , Kensington, her father having lived there before; and .being separated from his wife on account of disagreement. .No strong case of seduction was proved ; but as.thelgirl , bad been pregnant in con sequence of her acquaintance with the defendant, Lord- ELLEtitionouou ruled the plaintiff entitled •to a - Verdict for the loss, during her confinement in the parish workhouse, of the ,small services his . daughter hag been accustomed to perform for hi m ; and Jilso .. .for the cost of certain trifling ne cessaries incidental tb such confinement, which the. plaintiff had iirovided for her. The Jury gave ,tlONApAaTit's Most valinible etteets still re main packed up ; and this eireunittance has pro cured him the nickname of Prince de LAMBELLS, (renzbalM, the packed up.) Certain Cure for a Ring- Worm—Dissolve a small bit of blue vit r i o l ( sulphate of corkie)' Ti C n -vvil) glass of wat er ; wash .the 01)47 solution twice a d ay for two or three days, -and cure will ensue. • %% arm with this OLD BAILEY. . _ Yesterday the trials were Jestitnte o f P ublic E. LYebb was inflicted r . butiglatieu'ljY break; flkin" g* ink; and eritering the ling- lOUS n igtet illen(les Dacosta, Esq. and stealing therein.Ses linen, and 'apparel. The prosecutor rest r4scotc-street i Goodman's-fields , an d thei d On the night and saster.was formerly his servant. t i llel2i.h.of April ; the house ‘vas broke °P e "' A • f t e .l , e , ploperty as laid in the indictment swi en i 00 k. trhile servant was awoke by the ringitig,,,o, 5 116 kitchen bell, at four o'clock in the trorninbe: an d went down stairs with another maid-seria'-' stolt et a person Irdin without desired - to see the ffi a to of the house, b u t th e servan t s at that iiine to be ser , no notice of it, and they retired aka'" Snow 'after the bell was pulled .a g ain, the alitY i " re loor rants then understood that something i x: a a t ra ..4 i e n e is o s, to a r n c t e l t t i, he a y m f l o t u h l e vt ptit!oapteitltlye sktioticehne.uotrcfe[ri! prisoners was detected- by Forrester, an,, ° A. in making off with the booty,- , -;-Guilty , Richard Patch was found guilty of einu e ; - oe the sum of SO/. on the Bth of February and of property of Stevenson, Remingtons, au" Lombard-street, Bankers. , DREADFUL. ACCIDENT AT NE\VCAO.--- era y FURTHER tuen [ lyi and P AR TICULARS.] o R y T sI were Onl • their escape. In a very short time, th e rot closed up the lower month of the shaft; apt aint in the o i t • teeisrseibi shaft, f o i t n , g t ' , light it rose to the hei,ghtb of 24 fathoms, row woul ter e ve n er t ey higherr e ta x i e n i e pt thatentertained o which were said to be above the level of tb e '‘ a•communication with them by the old wail , Considerable difficidties, however, presented he. A as d and clioa.li:j o su lefPl selves. The support n'lu ob o ft) ; ts e v water, s ic)ivtets" f . I " bse) el " ((i(litrte:°'P:gi.3aietil make lt red ths wo olcl i a ung with it some trees which had been Pl' i t o . round the spot. An old shaft, in front ot - . 11c :di•• Flail, has not, ho‘vever,,presented a like .musing f t I;ri ernigrkuients: merit.; and .consequently every exertibu ls-1-baJ tic open a communication by that way'. f r ileY o 01 1 p t u oa n c e eb o e; v a and we .sinr of ti i: ii e )r a et c ivi h ee ed the sea 11 ° 0 r fat i S . Saturday, which was five fathoms from th e rke ly successful, if latiou of inflammable air, with which t to workings appear to be filled. Ever Wic i , e , t h o tso cident; three large engines (one of drov'' power) have been constantly employed ink; the water from the pit, at the rate 6 1 ro ing 1200 gallons gel minute, yet on frilNY frl ft 'bior i n r t e e d fi friy rt , s an 37ee i llj o i l i a ° it was found to have attained the height °‘ ho sit• one fathoms up the shaft. In the eveni n g' f e et, ever, the water had decreased. atriatitre s owe and we understand has continued to decregsetsiot that time ; so th a t no do u bt is now ente! wits of the Colliery b e i ng a t s ome future per4se,,,telA set to work. We now come to state thevieircri of the calamity. Mr. Miller (the under thirty'who has left a w id ow. and eight w childr e , f '' ) ..se vga two .Workmen, forty,to boys, an d 11 “ r 7idow s ' horses, have p er i s h e d ; an d twentV -five `b e in oBll with about eighty children, are left t o ,, others' the sudden de a th o f their husbands an widool We need • not recommend the ease of th e co i e ucil and orphan to the commiseration and ben ieir of a-gener ous p u bli c ; a su bscription for t"ticalets lief has alre a dy been set on foot by Get",o whose influence and characters can tot der it successful. CURE> p3p e_ri accidentally We gave a summary account, in a former , 1 . - by nf a sil'rprising cure performed last sum rlic 09 Dr. Balfour, of Edinburgh, upon .a . 11 ' 3 " oil an . i n ch loc i, understand he has lately a halt in length, of one of his fingers, an d ` v SiVe cut off entirely a piece, the Doctor replaced with complete success• ~..00 Ar. Henry W. Bailey, surgeon, Thetforthiroars , stating, that while perusing Drl d l, WO in the -1 , - -1 hot, account of the case alluded to, Medical and Surgical Journal, for Octobe r ore il he was called to a similar accident that °c c ; Ir. at Auxton, a village two miles distant• I;i n e, bonier employed in su pplying a chaff - i nac r en' wrought. by a horse, got his middle fig e s 0 4 could, l a received a letter iil,or, tangled among the knives, by which :i't was ttrely cut off at the joint nearest the o i nt• ' i f ` lie to ut it in the power of Nature to e ir e ct .lev re : re-union of the parts, Mr. 13 1 1 - o p9 o placed them, and desired the man to c a die him in about a week, fully expecting to fi n do 10 part that had been cut off mortifies• f 1:,., 1104 Bailey's astonishment, however, adbes-'°l-t the etankdeonfprlialceefi;ngpeurl,saatinotilltivleascc,l)ilsottiitrictlY felt !O w ' o f the ; Joe tated part tvaa•healthy. In five weeks fr7 on 0 5 e o ff c , curring of the accident, complete re- the sl oe reed, and the power of tbc fit - 40 i s „ t I , it.l now as if no such mischance had befill oa , 0 ^ Thus the practice, introduced by D r ' 13 ' 1 ve V ela attempting the re-union of parts that 1 i aolit totally separated from the animal syste o, Is , cro to kin d ' s4 to prove of the greatest benefit to man t h a n it even to be of no farther advantage prevent deformity.--(Scotch paper) James aan Y i uni hope-streeteenttreh j,rer at May.fair, Lady Harriet LeFeo n k yirs.p uri of _ On Sunday last, at his' house in Hans-Pla"' d :64o, ; :ed : 2a b lEtal o gsy t q l h : two 'l3clioßcriTaSt. her houseGi nwGerr: of class 0 one .taeotr;:dsonntb.u:gh, the Hou• the 13di On Thursday, the 11th inst. A • MARRIED. of the ~~on• om )a ' ' • °Non. ny s serrlce, to Miss Charlotte 12 .. ! . 112f d• Miner , J5Ol. Trinity On::n or t t l i a .a y k lry Charles Beruers, E sq a t ,, o f Ws ag' e t Th ° On Monday last •-• Cirerard-6tre .of Holro •r+ I: • at Ins house, t off) )„, ~s(i. In the 7stli year of-flis age. , so for (;ollege, Cann,' id e. ari::::::delal,PiVolrerstone Park, 01;5 pepper Conant, I. cro vere 1.71% , 1 . 1)(,)N : lakit :tut by J. CA:E.STAtits f4,0• 0 y orixt,'" e : aT'lciinvi‘; and ptibliilied 1;s: W. A. SREPPS2c t lic fie, strand ; ‘fi'cisrc adds vents, Orders, Letters (post-paid), &c. tnust I