The Sun. — London, England, 1820-11-13 00:00:00

FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SPANISH PAPERS. MADRID, OCT. 27.-(THE CORTES.) The following are the particulars of the pro posals made by the Committees of Finance and of Commerce relative to the prohibition of Fo reign Produce and Manufactures, in consequence of the bases 25 and 29 of the General Tariff : a Art. 1. T r prohibition to import provisions of any kind, whether liquids or dry, which is established by the ancient Tariffs, and by Decrees of the Cortes, shall be retained in the general Tariff, and shall be extended, and apply to all such as our own dosninions produce in sufficient quantity for con sumption, without any exception but that which is mentioned in the 4th Article. " Art. 2. In the same manner shall be retained and ex tended in the general 'f ariff the prohibition to import foreign articles or manufactures, of which we have national mann frctories, and the principal raw materials which enter into the composition of which are produced in our country, with out any exception whatever. " Att. 3. In the preceding regulations cattle of all kinds are included, with the exception in the fallowing article:— " Art. 4. In order to reconcile the general interest of th, whole nation with that of each province in particular, thl Provincial Deputations, who may apprehend serious detri went to their respective provinces, from the executions o Articles 1 and 3, may petition for the necessary modifications and no the information of the Government, the Cortes slna determine what is proper. " Art. 5. The produce of the East Indies shall he the sub. jeet of special Decrees of the. Cortes, and till they are pub lished the Royal Ordoonances hitherto in force shall he re tained." Mr. FREIRE spoke at some length on the de trimental influence of this plan upon America.-- It was supported by Mr. Oliver, and Members of the Committee.. Count de TORRENO thought that the adoption of these regulations, instead of producing a great benefit, would do much mischief, especially considering the state of imperfection of our manufactures, which would not improve, un less they- had some competition to strive vt ith, and the monopoly would be highly injurious to many provinces, which would be forced to purchase at a high price articles which they might have - on much easier terms from abroad ; he voted for sending the Report back to the Committee. Mr. MARTENY DE LA Rosa dwelt 9n the noto rious injustice of prohibitory laws. Mr. CUERTA thought that experience was not unfavourable to seasonable and well-considered prohibitions, and that the example of France and England should have more weight than the theories of their writers, whose spirit and object may be unknown to us. He allowed that the prohibitory system had sometimes been carried too far, but maintained the necessity of adopting it, as the wisest nations have done. The MINISTER of the INTERIOR judged it to be highly proper that the Committee should take wore time to procure the data necessary for the foundation of the general regulations which it i as proposed to establish. In the sitting of the 26th,. it was resolved, in conformity with a proposal of the Government, to build 20 ships of war for the protection of Commerce, viz.—Two frigates of 50 guns each, six corvettes of 30 guns, six brigantines of 22 guns, and six sloops of 14 guns ; 13 millions of reals were assigned for this object exclusively. In the sitting of the 27th several articles of the projet of law on the force and organization of the standing army were read and discussed. tly the sth Article the three Swiss Regiments are to be abolished. The nation will make good all the injury which, according to existing engage ments, this measure will cause. The individuals of those regiments who desire to remain in the service of Spain, shall be incorporated with the national troops with their present rank, but must take out letters of naturalization, The regiment of Custa is also abolished. FLANDERS MAIL• FaAKKroitT, Nov. 2.—Lieutemtnt-General Count Nugent, who commanded the Neapolitan army, and was obliged to leave Naples when the revolution took place, has applied, as it is confi dently stated, to the Aulic Council of War at Vienna, where he now is, requesting to have a command given him in the army of Italy. I f we may give credit to letters from Trieste of a recent date, the situation of Ali Pacha is not so desperate as the Austrian Journals have stated. They say thpt the Pacha, who is sot up in the citadel of Janina, makes the most vigorous re sistance to the Ottoman troops, and that he may hold out a long time. To the reiterated sum mons of the Turkish General he has replied, that he will rather bury himself under the ruins of his , fortress than ever surrender. It even appears that he has made some sallies, which have occa sioned the Turks some loss. VI EV t, Ocr. 27.—The conferences between the Ministers of the great Powers, who are now assembled at Troppau, have already commenced. lt is Count Capo d'lstria, and not Count Nes selrode, who is commissioned by the Emperor Alexander to conduct the negociation in the name of Russ;a with the other powers. The two Em perors visit each other frequently. It is observed that the Prussian Ministers, Prince Hardenberg and Count BernstortT, are highly esteemed by the Russian Emperor, who has likewise given the most friendly reception to the Crown Prince of Prussia. BERLIN, OCT. 28.—The King has been for some time indisposed with a severe rheumatic at tack : it is thought he will not go to Troppau, and that it is for this reason he has sent the Crown-Prince, his son. FRANKFORT, Nov. 4.—The Berlin papers of 0ct.31, make no mention of the departure of the King- of Prussia for Troppau. It is affirmed, that the agents of the Police have gone from Vienna to Troppau, to observe all strangers who are not attached to the Minis ters, and other persons, whose functions render their presence necessary in that t(..vn. The bureau of Prince Metternich is attended almost in the same manner as at the Congress at Aix-la-Chapelle. Count Mercy and Mr. de Gents are charged, as they then were, to keep the protocol of the conferences. FOR THE SUN. The confusion of the Author in this, and other parts of his Answer, arises from not making a just distinction in Works, with respect to their motives—upon which all their goodness depends in the sense of our Articles. tinder our Dispensation, if Faith in Christ is not the pre dominant motive, whatever may be our moral activity, all that we do " is in the nature of sin, and consequently not good in our acceptation"—which is the very language of the 13th Ar ticle, subjoined. like the 12th, to correct any error that might arise from the preceding, and perfectly agrees with the senti ment of the Bishop, that we must be justified before we have produced Good Works. He never means to assert that we were not bound before Justification to do those Works, which, by the Law of Nature only may be called good, but which, if totally corrupt, we should not be able to du; we were even then bound to do such "works of righteousness as we could in our partially corrupt state, before the goodness of our Saviour had appear ed to Us " —but then, they were such as not having been done on the right principle, partake not of that goodness, and are not positively good in his sight. By the Answer to the Yd Question we might imagine that all men, once justified, performed their duty—but how much more consonant to general experience is the truth contained in the ad? All the confusion, however, seems to arise here from con founding, as before, justitication with everlasting salvation.— Now by the former is meant admission to the Christian Cove nant—which absolves us from our past sins, but Hot from all past, present, and to couw; henceforth we ghat' by indeed finally Justified as Heirs of Salvation, if we perform the conditions of that Covenant te which we ere admitted; and du those works which are our " bounden duty"—and which " neces sarily spring out of a true and lively faith," and which will be rewarded, as our Lord so often promises by himself and his Apostles, more especially by St. Paul, who is said to be so great an advocate for Faith alone, and who is quoted in the 15th Question as " declaring that God will render to every man according to his Deeds." The very same works, if possible, before Justification, not being performed on a Christian principle, will not meet with the same reward, but there is a divine Energy beginning with our first Justification, which we receive at Baptism—that not only releases us from the Sentence of Condemnation, but enables us both to will and do after God's good pleasure ; and will, at last, if we persevere unto the end, lead to our dual Justification. The more J reflect upon this part of our subject, I em the more convinced that the chief reason -of this difference be tween our Author and the Bishop, is the want of distinction between the last and the first Justification—which he will al ways confound with everlasting Salvation ! and it is to avoid the fatal inference, that may he drawn from this confusion that the Bishop has taken, in the first instance, so much pains to separate them, and basing vindicated before his opinion of their separation, I need spend but little more la bour to make any particular remarks upon many other parts of this Chapter, which are founded solely upon the erroneous hypothesis, so frequently confuted, that they are one and the same. The first justification is meant, when we art said to be jus. titled by faith only; because it is only by this right disposition and assent to the Covenant, that wecan at first be tried whether we are fit to be a party to it. When OUCC admitted, we shall so participate in its Divine influence, as continually to bring forth more and wore those " fruits of a true and lively faith," which never could have conic to maturity without that enli vening first principle of all righteousness, which alone can preserve us, as it first made us, faithful to the Covenant, and in.which fidelity, if we persevere unto the end, we shall also be finally justified. There is indeed one example, and a most singular and ex traordinary example, quoted by one of the ancient Father., of the first and last justification being one and the same, and that is, of the malefactor upon the cross, who was justified by faith only, or by that right disposition, which Ha that could look into the heart was alone able to discern ; and at the same time to know, that if be had lived, he would have been worthy, through the merits of his blood, pouring out for him at that moment, of the Paradise which he so ex pressly promised. "If he had lived," says this Fattier, and not regarded faith and its works, he should have lost his sal vation agaiu." What can prove wore incontestibly than this the Scriptural accuracy of the Bishop's 4th, sth, 6th, and 7th Questions, all bearing upon this point ? A man may be endued with faith that shall justify, or admit him to the Christian Covenant, and yet, if he carry not that principle into his life and practice, but suffer it, like the young man in the Gospel, to be choked by the riches or other temptations that are scattered in his way, to prove him, though at first he may not be far from the kingdom of Heaven, yet, falling short of the Commandments of his God, he shall at last fall short also of his glory. A man may hav e faith sufficient to carry him to a certain point, and no furth er ; there may he at one moment good dispositions, even 'amounting to holy resolutions, which yet may be checked in their course by the passion, that so easily besets us, and leading the life, we shall meet with the death, of unbelievers. The faith by which we were once justified, was only a general, historical belief in the truth of Chris tianity, residing only in the memory and understanding, not in the heart, and not the " true and lively faith,"-which is known as a " tree by its fruit," and being barren, shall be cut dowa for the fire, as fit for nothing else, and not like that tree, which brings forth here its fruit in due season, and shall hereafter flourish with everlasting wisdom, in the paradise of God. A. JR. HOLY ORDERS. (No. V.) In my Reply to the Pamphlet upon Episcopal Innovation, I observed that the former Article was addressed to the Romanist', who believed to inherent righteousness, went about to establish their own righteousness, and so a fund for their church of human merit; and in orr that thenwho believed in the other extreme might not receive the least sanction ; if his 19th Article was framed to soften any expres sion that might appear to disparage good Works, as a means of saltation--of which it is probable that some men had taken advaatoge, to shelter their own vices—as if they could he justified by Faith alone, without any regard to human con duct—and for this purpose, this Article is subjoined to the former, which was published ten years before—to set aside all the pretensions to salvation of such h 3 pocrites as profess to believe in Christ, and yet belie their profession by their life and practice. This Article therefore maintains that though Good Works cannot put away our sins, and endure the severity of God's judgment, yet, are they pleasing and acceptable to him, and though they can boast no merit to put away sin, nor -perfec tion to endure the severity of his judgment.—they are never theless acceptable in his sight, and indeed from the sequel of this Article they spring out necessarily of a true and lively Faith, which by them may be as evidently known as a tree discerned by the fruit"—though therefore they must not be considered as meritorious or sufficient of themselves—yet,they are necessary and absolutely indispensable to salvation. In the Answer to the first of the Bishop's Questions upon this Article, so harmonious with its spirit, a glaring absurdity meets us in the onset : by this Answer, we arc bound to do Good Winks before Justificatii , though then, according to the same Author, me were totally corrupt and by conse quence totally incapable of doing them—therefore by his argument, we are positively bound by God to do what is ab solutely impossible. Crown-Office, Nor. 1 1, 1820. Member returned to serve in this present Parliament. 61st Ditto—Assistant-Surgeon Charles Whyte, from half. pay of the late York Chasseurs, to be Assistant-Surgeou, vice Joseph Magrath, who exchanges. 92(.1 Ditto—Captain Stephen Noel, from half-pay York Chasseurs, to be Captain, vice Mitchell, appointed to the Oath Foot. lath Royal Veteran Battalion—Lieutenant Charles Lenn, from the 4tst Foot, to he Lieutenant, vice Thomas Robert Parker, who returns to his former situation on the Retired List. HOSPITAL STAPP.--Assistant-Surgeon William Lloyd, from half-pay, to be Assistant-Surgeon to the Forces, vicelohn Davy, 1'51.1)., who exchanges. Messouissoirm.--Deputy Assistant-Commissary-General A. Brawler, having failed satisfactoray to explain various charges of misconduct 'adduced against him, has been dismis sed the service. Commissions in the Regiment of Sussex Militia, signed bvtbc Lord Lieutenant of the County Of Suisex. Captain John Paine to he Major, vice Sheen , resined Lientenatit-Colonel Geo. NVyndhaus to be Captain, vice Paine promoted. BANKRUPT(:IE• SUPERSEDED. W. Willinson and .1. R. Bell. of Old Broad-fitreet, ship and L.urance- bi °Leis. BANKRUPTS'. A. Smith, Lime-street-square, merchant, Nov. 18, 25, and Dec. 23, at eleven, at Guildhall. Solicitors, Messrs. Reardon and Co. Corbet-court, Gracechurch-street. J. larbt ie, Bucklershury, warehouseman, Nov. 18, 25, and Dec. 23, at kleven, at Guildhall. Solicitors, Messrs. Crowder and Co. Frederick's-place, Old Jewry. T. Town, Yalding, Kent, miller, Nov. 18. 25, and Dec. 23, at eleven, at Guild hall. Solicitors, Messrs. Brace and Co. Su; rey-street, Strand. J. Cook, Oakley Mills, Suffolk, miller, Nov. IR. 25 and Dec. 23, at eleven, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. West, Ked Lion-street, I .s.'apping. J. Orme, Wigan, Lancaster, money scrivener, Dec. 1,2, and 23, at eleven, et the George Inn, Liverpool. Solicitors, Messrs. Lowe and Co. Southampton-buildings, Chancery. lane, London ; and Mr. Gunnery, Lower Castle-street, Li verpool. T. 'Marsden, Pimlico, horse dealer, Nov. 14. 21, and Dec 23, at twelve, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Lloyd, King-street' St. James's-square. J. Norman, Lucas-street, Commercial-road, master mariner, Nov. 18, 25, and 1/ec. 23, at eleven, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Wright, Fenchurch-street. J. F. liolderneese, Bucklersbury, merchant, Nov. 21. 25, and Dec. 23, at twelve, at Guildhall. Solicitors, Messrs. Young and Co. St. Mildred's-court, Poultry. W. Keates, of Bishopsgate-street Within, hosier, Nov. 14, es, and Dec. 23, at ten, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Brook ing, Lombard-street. M. Haile, Cheltenham, hotel keeper, Nov. 28, at seven, 29, and Dec. 23, at Svn, at the Plough Hotel, Cheltenham. Solicitors, Mess's. Vizard and Co. Lincoln's Inn-fields; and Messrs. Pruen and Co. Cheltenham. W. Bright, Newland, Gloucestershire, dealer in corn, Nov. 24, at six, 25, and Dec. 23, at eleven, at the Lower George Inn, Gloucester. Solicitors, Mr. Meredith, Lincoln's lots New-square; and Mr. James, Colford, Gloucestershire. J. Houlistun, of Thayer-street, Manchester-square, tailor, Nor. 14, 21, and Dec. 23. at tan. at Guildhall. Solicitors, Messrs. Dawsun and Co. Sarille-plaee, New liorlington-street. A. Brander. Budge row, upholsterer, Nor. 14, 25, and Dec. 23, at ten, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Luckett, Wilson street, Finsbury-square. J. Cannon, Liverpool. merchant, Nev. IS, 45, and Dee. 29, at eleven, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Young, Charlotte-row, Mansion-house. J. Fry, Dorset-street, Salisbury-square, tailor, Nor. 21, 15, and Dec. 23. at twelve, at Guildhall. Solicitors, Alaybew and Co. Chancery-lane. W. Abbott, Windliaiu-place merchant. Nov. IS, 25, an d Dec. 23, at el e v en , a t Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Stephen, Broad street building.. IL Benham, High-street, Borough, ironmonger, Nov. 21, 25, and Dec. 23, at twelve, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Sut cliffe, Earl-street, Illackfriars. P. Chambers, Stamford, Lincolnshire. shoemaker, Nov. 22, 23, and Dec. 23, at eleven, at the Crown Inn, Stamford. So licitors, Messrs. Rowland and Co. Lincoln's inn -Gelds; and Mr. Redifcr, Stamford. W. Hill, Doric/no-green. within Windle, Lancashire, beer brewer, Dec. 1,2, and 23, at one, at the York Hotel, Liver paul. Solicitors, Mr. Mason, Nave 13ridge-street ; and Mr. Leather, Liverpool. W. Myrtle, Brighthelnestone, hatter, Nov. 20, 21, and Dec. 22, at twelve, at the Old Ship Inn, Brightlielinstone Solicitor, Mr. Fairlifull, Little Witichester.street. Al, Lovenbury, Bradford, Wiltshire. victualler, Nov. 40, 21, and Dec. 23, at eleven, at the White Lion Inn, Bath.- Solicitors, Messrs. King and Co. Gray's lnu-square; and Mr, Bush, first:Hurd. C. icarne, Old Broad-street, merchant, Nov. 14, Dec. 2, et one, and 413, at ten.rit Guildhall. Solicitors, Messrs. Crow der and Co., Frederick's-place. Old Jewry. H. Wood, Ropemaker-street, CrippleKete, coseheoniab, Nov. 18, 28, and Dec. 23, at tan, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Hutchison, Crown-coon, Threadneedle-street. DIVIDENDS. Dec. 2, A. Young, St. Switbin's-lane, merchant—Nov. H E. Blytb, Dyers'-buildings, Eloll.urn. dealer--Dee. 2, B Tupling, Strand, jeweller—Dec. 2, J. Harkness, Addle street. Wood-street, merchant—Dec. 9, J. Bayliss and T, Thompson, Piccadilly, ironmongets—Dec. 20, W. Shalerass, Joseph-street, St. Pancras, baker—Dec. 12, J. Fish and J. Nusslan, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, soap-makers—Dec. 6, S. Cave, Cheltenham, jeweller—Nov. 18, C. Mackenzie, Caro liue-btreet, Bedford-square, merchant—Nov. 19, L. Lyons, Lower Shadwell. brewer—Nov. 18, T. Dowley and J. Dowley, Willow-street, Bankside, coal-merchants—Nor. 18, It. Hodgson, Fleet-street. oilman—Dec. 9, G. Ilardisty anti J. Cowing, Bedford-court, Saint Paul, Covent-gar den, woollen-drapers—Deo. 16, T. Ellerby, Pool, Dorset shire, linen-draper—Nov. 18, R. Wilson, Bow Church-yard, merchant—Nov. 18, W. May, Spital-square, silk-manufac turer—Nov. 25, 'l'. Chapman, Lit tlebary Mills, Essez, meal -111110--I)NC. 4, W. Toll, St. Germans, Cornwall, miller—Dec. 5, S. Worrall and A. Pope, Bristol, bankers—Dec. 5, J. Ful larton, Manchester, saddler—Dec. 2, D. Johnston, Brown street, Hanover square, smith—Dre. 2, J. Yearn, Plymouth Dock, saddler—Dec. 12, J. Ball, Poole, shocwaker—Dec. 7, J. Elliott, Farnham, common-brewer—Dec. 4, T. Adams, South Shields, ship-ownsr—Dec. 13, J. Wood, Thorne', Yorkshire, and J. Wood; Wake fi eld, dyers—D ec . 4, J. Rid tug, Blackburn, Lancaster, cotton-manufacturer. CERTIFICATES--Dec. 4. T. Bond, Armitage, Staffordelaire, waltster—J. Jackson, Liverpool, sail-maker —J. T. Koster, of Liverpool. merchant —H. Emmett, Liverpool, colour-maker—T. S. Sandilands, Twyitig, Gloucestershire, scrivener—H. ltatcliff, bortiton, Lancaster, farmer —C. Jeremy, Acre-lane, Clapham, lineu draper—J. R. Browne, New road, Pancras, statuary—W. Foster, Strand, silversmith—S. Cvatup,Vine street, Millbank street, corn-dealer—J. Jones, Leominster, linen-draper. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. William Handy and George Bentley, — Worcester, auc tioneers—William Bracey Kent and John Gawdery, Great Marlbutough-street, brush manufacturers—Wl:flaw Bulwer and George Nicol,Cleveland-row,St,Jumes's, printers—David Palmer and Thomas Lawson, Old Change, warehou , en►en— John Wareing, William Wareing, jun. and James Warring, Waterhead-Mill, Lancashire, cotton spinners —Edward Pletts and James Rand, New Larubton, Durham, owners of the salt ►works--Jamues Rawlings, Isaac Rawlings, Samuel Gregory, and Rachael Rawlings, Frotne-Selwood, Somerset, card makers—Charier Fait clung!' and George Het►ry Mercy, Jon. Liverpool—Edmond T. Waters and T. Nlethold Waters, Lon don and Oporto, wine merchants—William Oborne and George Read, New Sarum, carpenters—Claud Neilson and James Ure, Glasgow—Claud Neilson, James ()re, and Andrew Johnston, Glasgow, and Kingston, Jamaica— Claud Neilson, James lire, and William Ure, Gl:►sgow, and St. Thomas—Samuel Gregory and James Wer Major, Frunze Soluersetshire, iwoul staplers—Mark Slowtuan and From the LONDON GAZETTE of Nov. 11. For the County of Warwick.—Francis Lawler, of Middleton Hall, in the said county, Esq. in the room of Sir Charles Mor daunt, Bart., who has accepted the Chiltern Hundreds. - Mar-Office, Now. 10, 1870- 22d Regiment of Light Dragoons—Joseph Vernon, Gent. to be Cornet, by*purchaset vice Klett]lf, promoted. 25th Regiment of Foot—Lieutenant William Dunne. from half-pay 2d Garrison Battalion, to be Lieutenant, vice Daniel Blackwell, who exchanges. 40th Ditto—Lieutenant John Crabb. from half-pay 58th Foot, to be Lieutenant, vice John Foulkes, who exchanges, receiving the difference. 4 I st Ditto—Ensign George Johnson to be with out purchase, vice Lent!, appointed to the 10th Royal Vete ran Battalion ; John George Bedingneld, Geut. tube Ensign, vice Johnson. 49th Ditto—Captain John Mitchell, from the 92d Foot, to be Captain, vice Dixie Ellis, who retires upon half-pay York Chasseurs. William Armstrong, Commercial-roa4, wholesale drilgg',o Charles Ross and Robert Ware, New Broad-street, merc p li —James Gill and Willi am St o d art , Ski pton rockinen, --J , as or Wilson Tayl or an d J ames -S tep h en, W at li ng - s t re et, "d f t housemen—William Williams and Frederick Kling e° ,l,o High Beech. Ess e x, sc h oo l mas t ers —Th ome i s Nunn, jlirb.' hi o Ann his wife, J o h n L u k e , Ch ar l es W a l ton A y l es , an d itt r i Henry Weston, Wappint, shipwrights; fa far a' r e S:iod Thonsas Nunn and Mary Ann his wife=,-.lolln John Blunt, Throgmortnn-street, reercbants—Williou I vey and Peter *an', Llterpool, • NEXT WEDNESDAY ) " VERY BEGINS,—TW - „ Of TEN IN THE FIRST TN MINUTES, FOU R ` 4'10,000, AND ONLY csoo TICKETS. TS. ge i At many applicati o ns have been CORRESPONDE NT made to us for THE crt d to last Friday, which contained th e Quv.srtores propose o . Candidates for HOLY ORDVRS, by the Bishop of Frr efl o or ROUGH, and as we have been strenuously exhorted bl oe . Ecclesiastical Patrons to spread as widely as possible ' to e trines so well calculated to illu s t ra t e an d su pp o rt the 1 . 0 , Cbristiau Faith, we shall republish them in our Paper 0 , morrow.—PmlLo PATatAI to Tlia QUEEN, also TU.nOrr PRICE OF STOCKS HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORIW ,4 6; Morning, 20 minutes atter I Evening, 52 Infiniti-9 Pift,r_o, THE SUN. SOLER OUIS DICERS' FALSUM AUDEAr• Q It is confidently rumoured that the A N ovo .s l , given in the name of T HE Q UEEN t o several °f the Addresses to HER MAJESTY, are to be th e subject of legal notice. As THE QUEEN herself, from her ignorance of our language, cannot be Or posed to have seen through the designs of her wick' ed Advisers, we presume that it is intended to brio° the Authors, if possible, to justice.—Many o f them e ANSWERS were, indeed, of the most treasonabl e ' nature and tendency ; but as the evil spirits allna' ed to cared neither for the guilt or innocence 0r THE QUEEN, and made her the mere instrurevil t of their rebellious machinations, we hope that they will be discovered, and that the punish.' ment of the Law will be visited on them only. We reeeived yesterday the Paris Papers or Thursday last. Those of Friday, which were due this morning, have not arrived. The KING, on Wednesday, held a Council or Ministers. The accounts from Berlin state, that the King of PRUSSIA, in consequence of being much indis" posed with the rheumatism, has declined going to Troppau. It is singular that the same corn plaint should have attacked the E►nperor of AUSTRIA, on his arrival at Troppau, so as to confine him to his apartment, and prevent his proceeding to meet the Emperor of RUSSIA, on the progress of the latter to that town \ The Vienna Intelligencer, however, of the 29th tilt states, that the Austrian Monarch had recovered. It is added, that the Ministers composing the Congress had all assembled, but that the confe rences were expected to be finished at Troppalll and that they will not, as recently reported, be resumed at Vienna. It is still said that the Em peror of Russia intends to proceed to,Berlin. The advice. from Naples of the 21th ult. state the arrival there of two vessels from Palermo, after the receipt of intelligence there of the Con vention having been annulled by the Parliament, and that the city was perfectly tranquil. It may be added, that the Palermitans could scarcely be otherwise than tranquil, as in consequence of the convention they were all disarmed, and their arms, ammunitions, 84e. had been conveyed to Naples. They certainly have to complain in this instance of a gross breach of faith ; for whether they were styled rebels, or by whatever other appellation, General Florestan Pepe having negociated with them upon equal terms, and concluded with them a convention, under the shelter of the stipulations of which they delivered up their arms, they are, at all events, entitled either to have the conven tion fulfilled, or to he placed in the same situation in which they were at the time it was agreed upon. Under the circumstances in which they are placed, the Palermitans may probably be compelled to be quiet, but their attachment to the new order of things cannot be very warm or sincere. I. F rom Trieste, the 25th ult., it is stated, that • Ar.i. PACHA still held out in the citadel in which lie had taken refuge. An Augsburg article has a report that it was in contemplation to submit a proposition to die Ger manic Diet for establishing at Leipsic a General Censorship of the Press for all Germany. It was theught, hove", - ;; that the Governments in the South of Germany would refuse to accede to it. FIFE PER CENTS. Wednesday 77 f. sc. DEFERRED STOCK Of the 2td March, 1817 lO9 f. 40 c. ttd Sept., 1890 94 1. 60 g. EXCHANGE ON LONDON. One Month Three 'Mouths Saturday, at two o'clock, a Cabinet Council was held at the Foreign Office, in Downing street, which sat till about half-past three. THIII DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK. s per Cent. Red. Ol fig Bank Lone: Ann. 11 11 ' 46 r. I-per Cent. Cons. GAITS; 6944 India Bonds II per Cent. 77i Ex. Bilis. 2d. 3s. 4s. ts• S 4 'Aif. I per ('eats gqi, per Ct. Navy Ann. ..104iii I Cons. for Account.. 6 8 D ' s LONDON, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 13, Iv2o. Co BILE