The Sun. — London, England, 1815-06-09 00:00:00

' -soldahle in tide way of objectinn , . could he no ),Iger held out as a bugbear. - There was, no e:nnuninication whatever 6tvreen the IrishClitrch and - the See of - Monte in the least touching the protstant religion,' or the reotestant establish /malts i;i that country. All that now took place eras thelavestittire -of the Irish Catholic Bishops 1-..ith t h e c onsecrated. Pall. He- did not ` - see .thy ls - hy the Catholic Hierarchy 2hould be interfered diev _wanted no stipend, or arty thing else from the• British Govetnment. lle then expatiated ou the policy of eoadliatirig, by every fair and constitutional means, every clays and descriptiOn +:t his Mojesty's subjects i and after enforcing these topics with some fdrther argument and alas- - aration„ 'concluded by moving - , '' Thar this 'loose take into its consideration, in a Corn zhittet of the whole House, the pre cut state of his Majesty's 7tor.tait sithjects'of Great Britain and eland with 'reference to the l a ws fry which they still continue ,to 1:e de inked-of the real ben,fits of the ISritish-Constitution:: . The Earl of B UCKINGIIAS I SH ME was decidedly of opinion, that upon the Act of - 1793: a stand should lie made, because by it was given every thing that those Catholics could consistently enjoy tinder a Protestirut Government, and every thing essential to their rational freedom, their happiness, and their 'neosperity. With respect to the oath on. •which the Noble Earl .bad so strongly remarked, Lx entertained a contrary opinion, and begged leave to say, that the oath, though not the - same es originnliy - proposed, was not substantially dif ferent front what waS•approved by the Irish gene rally, and it was even framed in consequence of a declaration made by the Irish Catholics them selves ; and he begged leave farther to say, that what the Catholics then asked for was short of what they actually obtained by that Act. But it was the Oath of Supremacy the great bond of .the union, between Church 'and State, Nvilich they would have to take, in, order fully to 'Vice them on the same tooting with their Pen aestatit fellow-subjects—and until they took that, they were incapable of so participating: .as rein supremacy was an immutable principle with the Catholics. On this topic he would refer the :Noble Lord to a hirh authority, which he re, spected, and which, he believed, the Noble Lord himself respected still more. He was equally dis tinguished for his great 'abilities, and - for the part lie took with respect to the Catholic cause. He meant the Noble Lord's own Father. • He stated on the Bill of 1793, that the great bulwark of the Constitution was a Protestant Parliament, Lords and ' Commons, and Judges--but that with these it would be no infringement of the Constitution to give the .Catholics the joymeot of the elective franchise. his own opt trop was, that in a final settlement with the Catholics (the practicability of which 'he doubt, ed), every thing may be given them but the Par liament, the State, and the Church ; and he con- • ceived it might be done without their suffering any thing in their political or even in their civil capa cities. But from the Noble Lords view 'of the subject, and in the absence of necessary s , curities; he could not think the going into a Committee 'Was a fit measure for their Lordships to adopt. lie quoted the Resolutions of the Catholic Pre lates on the accession of the late Bill on the sub ject, in support of what he advanced, and he therefore thouqht that until the Catholic Prelates !Should change their opinions,•all such securities as had been proposell twist be illusory. Refer ring to what. the Noble Lord had said on the to pic of the Union, he justified the conduct of the Government on that occasion ; averred that no provkion had been made as to the removal of the Catholic disqualifications : hilt simply an as surancr given that their claims should hoftilly and .caodidly discussed in an Imperial Parliament, which. it Was amply on record had been :most fully and ably, as well as repeatedly done, con ten:iing that the Act of 1793 contained a good aild favourable settlement for the - Catholics, and that the Union was a most- advantageous measure for Ireland. The Noble Earl -con eholed by expressing his dissent from the motion: Lord DE DUNSTANYILLE spoke shortly against. the motion. - • . . Lord GEENVILLE approved of what .fell from Lis Noble Friend as to his proposition having no connection, with the Resolutions alluded to ; and with him, he distinctly disclaimed every sort of • influence derivable from a principle of external dictation. Nothing therefore, should induce him • to vote for the Resolutions as they now stood ; • but if he voted for the question, it should only be because he believed that the subject deserved the maturest deliberation. There never was a las++ framed with more liberality than that of 1793 ; but without wishing to depreciate that law, lie must say, that circumstances had since materially altered its relations. The consideration of the te corities was of the utmost consequence, and when ever it Might. come on, he-should meet it with a mind perfectly unprejudiced. It WRS•not a point for consideration, this day; bat he should be glad to -find that the time for it was near at band.-- More than this it was not necessary for him to . say ; but he - intreated their Lordships to lay out of their minds all prejudice that might influence them 'front that which had been improperly done L6rdship, alluded to the late Resolutions - of the Catholics), and only to consider whether the great body of the Catholic inhabitants of the empire could be rendered more free, more happy, And more contented with the Constitution, whose they _might thus more fully enjoy. '1 ha Earl of LIVERPOOL. felt it not - necessary to emir into any discussion of the subject at this tine ; conceiving that another opportunity would be far more appropriate. But he would ask whe ther any benefit could arise from acceding to the ;notion of the Noble Lord, of entering imme diately into the Consideration of the question ?.--- Ile did not think it possible that the House could go into. its &nsideration with any satisfaction at time. This was not, in -his opinion, a ques tion of enriniry. We knew all.the advantages and. disadvantages of the system ; •anti ticiiersoit could Say that the Hoose -was- vot fitly apprised of it in• all its- bearings.- .would sizund :a considerable alarm M the 'country- if now consiclei . ed and he Awls not inclined to:create au evil without know ing what would be. the remedy foi• it. It the enquiry should not end in way that the Noble Lord wished, it would create „disappointment ; std he would say, _that h'e conceit t:ci the proper course ptoceeeling would be, to see the lure and extent of the evil that - was wished to be removed, and also the nature and extent of the remedy. The measure involved one of the great est constitutional qnesti-diis -- that could possibly be agitated. The Noble Lord 'admitted that the .House ought to protect Protestantism ; and he would therefore ask, whether it wasnot , essential inquirewhettler or not we should- have a Pro testant-Parliament The opinion -ht: had long since forated on this subject had undergone. ito alteration ; and he would ask, - whether, in a Go= vernment where the Crown acts upon the tespon sibility of Ministers, it was possible . for the Cro . wee to maintain that Uoyerionentlture without the Whole of the, establishments Lein" continued as they now existed % Res,pectingthe introduction of securities, all he shoujd ',say was, that upon the best view he had taken of the subject, he could never believe that a6r Committee could execute their purpose. 'From ate very nature of the else, and the state of the Catholic Church, there never could Lee such securities adopted as would be satis factory to either party. It was not the question, whether the House should new-model the Catholic opinion, but' whether the boon demauded by the Catholics could be acceded to ; alt.l he was firmly coovineed, that make it its grateful as possible, it would be rejected, and fail in its object.. On the whole, therefore, he could see no advante what ever in.going into the Cotninttee which,trie Noble Lord had 'pi °posed Lord i\IEL - y E said- he should give his vote against going into the Committee: He was one of those who on a former day had voted for a Committee on•the Petition, beeause,he thought something satisfactory might result from it ; but 'he had been disappointed. Yet he was not with out sotne•sanguine hope that the time would come when both Hottse of - Parliament as well as the 'Catholics might meetio opinion ; but the present was not the time for inquiry. The Duke of SUSSEX said he would vote for the Committee. Lord MULGRAVE would also vote for the q►►estion. The Earl of Hanitowßv thought it impossible for things to reinain on the present footing, and if l►e could foresee any benefiCial consequences from being into Committee, he should certainly vote for it. The late-period of the Session, how ever, was a material objection with-him agai►ist it and, if be were a Catholic, he-would rather that the question should be taken up at any other pe riod than the present. Lord BORINGDON said a few words expressive of• Lis belief that the question might be - brought to decision in the next Session.. • The Earl of DONOUGHMORE then proposed, with a View to meet the wishes of the House'to alter his motion, and instead of the wtirds " im mediately proceed," tlc.!. to substitute, " in the next Session of Parliament." The Earl of WESTMORLAND declined pledging himself to any opinion for the future-by the vote for the question. • —Lord REDESDALE felt that circumstances might alter - extremely between the present time and that now proposed for taking the subject into consi deration. He conhl not think that any thing sk , tisfactory could be offered On this subject ; and whenever it might be brought forward, the House ought to consider the interest of the Protestant as well as the Catholic people. The Earl 01 - ABERDEEN said, the present was not an auspicious moment for entering upon an examination of this subject ; but a wore faro_ period might occur: Ile• was willing to as sent to the motion; because it did not hind their Lordships to the principle of concession, but merely to the expedienty of, futtire enquiry. • The motion as last proposed was then put, and a division tonic place, 'When the numbers tvere • Cantents ' Proxies Not Contents..... Proxies '•• Majority against the Motioa =-26 iliellouse afterwards. adjourned till To+thorrow. HOUSE 'OF COMMONS. The Irish 'Prosecution Bill was reaiL a. third time and passed. • Mr. ABERCROMBY.mored for an account of the number of causes heard and determined each' year by: the Master of the Rolls in Ireland, from the 'lst 'January 1806,AG the Ist January 1814. Ordered. . • , The Report of the Irish Ship Letter Bill was brought lip, and taken into consideration., To be 'read a third tune on Nltinday next. , The Report of the Irish-Excise Licence Bill. was brought T up, and taken into consideration. obe read a third tine on Monday nest : • • . • s The 'lrish Paper-hanging Bill, was :read -a third time and passed. . . .., . . . sir JOHN-NEWPOUT moved for a detailed account of the Law Charges of the second Solicitiir- of Ex6ise ia Ireland, during the last five years.- Ordered: ' . MENDICITY IN TI-Ili AIETROPOLIS. Mr. Rost rose to call the attention of the House to the state of the Mendieity in this Metropolis, Great pains bad been taken to ascertain its amount, and the labours of Mr. Martin on that subject, had furnished most of the information which_ t was his intention to produce. Front the researches and statement of that .6entlerban, it appeared, that 15,288 persons obtained their living by beg-ging in this metropolis. Of these.6ooo were •adults, and 9,288 children. Some mechanics who gained 40s. a-week sent their wives and children to beg in the streets. Upon the whole, they obtained great, sums of money. He *should think it a very low rate to calculate their gains .at 3s. a clay. They made much more, but supposing they only got 3s. a day, the sum obtained by the adults amounted• w 328,5001. a-year. The in convenience which they occasioned to the public Was notorious. Having no regular means of sub sistence, if they'faiied at any• time' to procure their usual gains, they substituted other ways still more depraved. But even if they could contrive to subsist, it was clear that their children, con demned to the same occupation, were brought up • in habits of vice and immorality. They never sent them to the free schools for instruction, for they employed them as their instruments —and their ..absence would diminish their,receiptS. lie then commended the establishment of free schools, which had proved highly beneficial. In some instances :children taught at those schools had even reformed their parents. He then des cr ib e d the method adopted on Mr. M a rtin's pl an , to reli eve t h e poor . Benevolent, persons were supplied by him with tickets, which. they gave to beggars instead - of money. , The Mendicants then carried those tick ets to ,Mr. Martin, who took 'the trouble of eu gutting into their real situation, and then applied what sort of relief be thought proper. There were other establishinentS for .the assistance of the poor. 7 'lire Stranger's Friend . in particular was admirably constituted. Its • members went kabout town to inform themselves respecting the state of various paupers, whom modesty 'prevent ed from beggiirg publicly, and applied relief in cases where it was really wanted. In the Refuge for the Destitute, persons were received tvhose circumstances entitled them to_assistance and consideration. The Irish Benevolent Society was .established chiefly to relieve the poor Irish, and -send them back to their country,- and had been itttended with considerable effect. Notwith standing all these institutions many evils remained to be removed. He meant to propose that a Committee be appointed to consider the state of mendicity in this Metropolis and its immediate neightiourhood. The first thing tire Committee shoMild do, would be to ascertain the facts to vidiich he had allotted, and the next to, consider what means could be adopted to remedy those evils. Where so many great num had failed, it would be extremely presumptuous in hint to make any proposal on the subject. But, be thought, that it Would' not be impossible to provide for the 7001) paupers (out of the 15,288) whO had pa rochial establishments in the metropolis. It would then be necessary to consider what was to be done wit h those from Scotland and Ireland. Time former were few in number, and he would suggest that they should he sent back to their country, which would provide For theta -and disperse them through their different parishes. The Irish would create more dif ficulty as they were mote numerous, and in-Ireland time was no paor's rates. It might be advisable to establish an asylum here. The sailors, who were the utost importunate begga,rs in the streets, should be made to live upon their pensions. He concluded by moving, . "That a Committee be appointed to consider the state of Mendicity iu this Metropolis and its immediate Neighboui , . hood." Mr. ItsrasitasLEY spoke in terms of praise of an institution for the relief of the poor in Dublin. Sir M.l.lmt.EY said, that four out of five persons never took the tickets to the Mendicity Mr. PEELE rose to say a few .words, in 'conse quence of the-recommendation of the Hon. Gen tleman to athipt in this country an institution si milar to that of-the House of Industry in Dublin. Nobody could be more convinced than he was of the very excellent manner in which it was con ducted, or of the necesity of having such an in stitution in Dublin, but still there ‘vere many reasons why he should not wish to see a similar establishment in London. It was true that every person who applied was admitted into the House of Industry' and in Ireland, Where there was no 'poor laws, such a regulation was necessary to prevent cases of extfeme distress ; but if it was supposed that that establishment prevented men dicitv, it was only necessary to look at the streets Of Dublin to be convinced of the contrary, for he believed there was no 'place where it existed to a greater extent than in Dublin. The institution in fact encouraged beggars, because, they knew that iu the last extremity thuy had a place of re fuge, and that they could not ,starve. It was really- astonishing what a degree of misery they would bear before they would avail themselves of that establishment, it was eve: sometimes neces sary to use torceio get them into it: He begged to guard himself against being misunderstood.— He thought ; for the reason he had before given, that such an 'institution was necessary in Dublin, and Ire - was - quite satisfied that-it was admirably conducted, but in his opinion no 'possible advan tage would be derived from a similar establish ment in this country. Sir JOHN NvArroaT deprecated the attempt to introduce the charitable asylums of _lreland into this country; they were necessary in Ireland, but not here. Mr, LOCKHART hoped that in regulating : the 'metropolis they would' not lose sight of the coun -ivy.. By driving beggars from London, they might afterwards' be let loose on the country. Mr. Rose said, it wasdesirable that-the respec tjve. parishes should take care of their own poor. N o b o dy was more averse than thiniself to remove any person while he could maintain himself; and he had first introduced a law to that effect. • Mr..LOCKIiiIiT explained. After some further observations from Sir John Sebright, Mr . . Alderman Atkins, Sir Chas. Monck, and - the Chancellor of the Exchetr,e •;the motion was agreed to, and a Committee nathed.. Mr, PEELE brought in a Bill to augment the Salary of the Master of the Rolls in Ireland,which was read a first time, mnd ordered to be read a second tune on Tuesday next. BATHING IN. THE THAMES. Mr. BARCLAY presented two Petitions; one from a con= siderable number of persons who resided near the Thames, and another from the watermen who plied on the River,--(a lau , 4ll)—against the repral of the clause in the Thames Po lice Act, which went to prevent bathing in the River. Mr. E. A; TAYLOR had, in the ?one space of twenty seven years, seen no instance of the indecency complained-of; and in the course of a year, though his house commanded an extensive view of the River, had scarcely seen six persons bathing. After some further remarks on the part of Mr. Wynne, Mr. Harvey, Mr. Calvert, and the Chancellor of the E xc h equer, the House went into a S;ottimittee on the ThameS Bathi ng Bill. Mr. HARVEY, in the Committee, moved a clause to gis e Magistrates.apower to affix a notice to prevent persons from bathing in such places where a nuisance had been proved to exist, and to impose penalties when the notice was dis obeyed. For the Clause • • 2B Against it Majority against the Clause —QS The Report was then received, and the Bill ordered. to be re ad a third time to-marrow and engrossed. TAX ON NEWSPAPERS, The Report of the Committee of Ways and Means having been brought up, and the .Resolu tions read,' Sir J. NEWPORT Ohieetell tO the 'proposed ad dition of a halfpenny to stamps on Newspapers; at this time, when it was so .necessary, the public should have abandant inforrnhtion on the state of pp;lic affairs. H e ' t h erefore spore d , as an.amend went to the Resolution for raising the price of Newspaper Stamps to four-pence, that it should remain as it before stood, at the rate of three pence balipenny• The CIiANCELLoR of the J XCHEOTTRIt said a I'm . to be ill' ttwords, words, but in so low aldine of voice as_ audible in the gallery. On this Amendment the House divid ed '. 16 For the Amendment ............ • ....... . 63 Against it ..... ..' .. .. ................... :. ... •• • • '-' ' ....Si . Majority against the Amendtneut. •• • • ' so d 3 The Resolutions Were then agreed to, Bill ordered to be brought in. EAST INDIA SHIPPING BILL: der idera" on, : tin ti The Report of the-Bill being taken into farther $6(3 conS Mr. WALLACE moved a clause, tha t no ship 7 - • i tons burthen should haV`e. a right of registry. 1 and moveda clause, whir Is was, a i t ti s s ° u n b le sta le n ' e le, Mr. MARVATT argued • - length acrain st •"- "0 the .service of the East India CoMpany, not hula 1 ; } r uisli United Kingdom,' should have the privileges of 3 ~,,, t i l l built ship, though such clause should not affect 1 10 Y s e ; `,,ut:• bad been re , tistered.• or chartered previously to its el:tal i- S - o ,e Mr. GRA ' NT, sett. opposed the Cl.inse; wlic.,",' a t r ani° observations on the part of Mr. Marryatt, , "'"F d d . the House tliv de / Atkins, Mr. Moore, and Mr. Forbes, •• • Foy Mr. Marryatt's Clause ...... a I ' Against . 39 t thout ;:I r. WALLACE'S Clause w - d -u ‘si ' id. as then agree division. - ' b e—, With respect to the number of. British.scamea.to . ,•• "‘ that no s . t , l i t I lic Toyed on maid India ships. uld b 6 employed for every one hundred toils of burden, be part l , i k , f l t l er ai s i i a t c i e e ,. c N t i i i n . v F m a •s l a r t e i et on t, o t n tie tl ( e hancei n Sir C. Pt)LE moved, that instead of five, Lascars. Vlcios , of r Ao s, ef rin ti a i n p A i., .• ' , ' . 1 I thel,..xchople . “po illr" - . Forbes, fir H. Montgomery, and Mr. Giddy. the I. "i 00 sition of Sir G. Pole %vas carried 'without a divii i "' 3'l' Bill ordered to be read a third time to-inorrow• Mr, II.•GILiDY obtai ‘ ned leave to bring in Tolls; and to allow of extra weights on Turniiihe-roao tain cases. - • . QUEEN ANNE'S BOUNTY% •ee ge" r. ARBUTHNOT tooVed an Address *to the Pi rs A vat for an account of the steps taketi bv the Gov e " tiA this Bounty, with respect to the aria dal disAi')ution of India, dated February to, filo sum of 100,0001. far the relief of Poor,Clergymen• salted . Mr. FAWCETT waved for a copy of a Memorial ig7 vir , w to the Lords of the Treasary from the merchants tra o e t ter , , on the subject to India. 0 0a5e The other Orders were then disposed of, seven sho sides • Adjourned. . - ____.........—...--aandnitlhl t().3l)a lorry't 6 ' LAW INTELLIGLNCE: • ._ _. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE s. .. . CRIMINAL INFORMATION. b" Mr. Cunwoon shelved Cause 'against tileng no obt a in e d by Mr. ATTORNEY GENERAL. cani C. A. Wright to slew Cause why a Critniall .11'' formation should not he filed a,ainst hirn, f'fi l :l , libel on Colonel Berleley, in ar'Newspaper calie( The Pcstscript.—After hearing the Le,ritetlGotil:l.: el', and a few observations from the ATT04,..; GENERAL, the Court ordered the liule to be rurto9 absolute. THE KING V. FRANCIS AUSSELT;,. I ro Oft This defendant, a mariner of R 'as' "L. it yi: t %s . ~,,„ seizing up tor jungment by default;to arilsfi.nlou 1)' and assaulting and obstructing excise riotously assembling - With upW ofso' -01i3°it; o flicer s e . affidavits in support of the prosecution, tha t o f defendant threw a large stone, whi eh hit 10''e•-ie the officers on the head. This the dcleu"nrilice smuggled goods, lt appeared from tli): flied by affidavit, and 'Stated that he had lost t ' ,,ir t sentenced him to :three months' sous 111 the service of his countrY• Ti 3c t 0 Horsham gaol. -I 1 • r amte' The A • • • 0 a TORNEI- ENERAL then rept .- i • i di , proceeding which the defendant's Ct./00'Y f • " 1 ciously refrained from availing himscit ' '. or that the minister, chtirefiwardens,• and 1",ot -*L habitants of a parish had given .the defer' pot certificate that they (lid not believe the Oen guilty. : • • LIBEL. ~ . ca ds !, Mr. SCARLETT moved for a s a l e rutel.o-": L, imprisoualeu Why a criminal 'information should not li c t .: l , :. e is against Mr. Wignell, a :Banker_ in Norwich' ',jut, libel contained in certain letters_ written bYten. against the assignees of a bankrupt in ti"“ ' , all ties formed ,a sufficient ground for gran ting ' The CounT did not_ think the 'letters 11.1 i g e joi e, considering that the question ti . _ still . oug ht to DI; mitred tO-a Grand htry. ' = • NUISANCE. R A V1.1 215°14. THE KING V. COX, MATSO',,,f,-AND --1,..,c0wiC•1 - These defendants, Proprietors of L II : - .. , ke ep. Stages, standing convicted of a niiisance:_.".lj,.stoo ing their carriages - standing next the c i i ,i ' ver e - . or , at Charing-Cross, were brought -tip, an'. , t betn , tiered by the Court to enter into surette% 501. each; for their future selves in 500/. each, and two sur eticii I ...... ,_______:_________,----_ _So ter; GUILDHALL.---ExTENsivE 11.013BEItl• „ v eil. ti IIIICICI day. Mary Clarke was brought op, an- biog. Pi a final examination, charged with rob .re.et, c Flcet's't .. 'petal Ellison, furrier, of Gough-squsre" ' utrs , " a quantity of down feathers, fur, In : to s cve i r e silks, and other articles, amotinoug emitted . 0- 0•00 a conduct.. hundred pounds. She was fully cotlo" trial.. o 'cloc k ', at fo ur et sta c ' e . ' .. On Wednesday morning, poor Woman, of the .name of Marg .° ',stre et, .vate :cc residing at No. 8, New-street, e l ' a P e • in t" Westminster, whose husband is a pri oil of f Wa"ficct Beth Ist regiment of Foot _Guards, now ,elis.cred ° under the Duke of Wellingi oti; per,. for th - 5 A short time 'afterwards sh e I ' l The Pr:At ; two male . children, who remain iitil.ol);,nt. , 0,Q., third boy, who• soon expire . 4 then;, ~c man continued ill" during the whole v I oclo 5" , in tt and yesterday morning, about l, She i ' -- brought forth a fourth child, d cat ' be arc' fair way of recovery, and . the t° Est to a • ppeat <thee, in perfect lfealtb• . On Wednesday last, at nalbata, F irs ' A WWI H• , Q , caery 13zu craft' °f a daughter. Yesterday, at St. IVlargaret's, t iro. MARRO:P. • p Oiga ster , "' ,;aonoti • 'r Majesties vr o!e . o.xti, Vrelit I T, es r rvatorY,. 4; to Esq. Astroamer t the,ir and Professor of Sconictry in the )'° %; 1313 ',-T - C. W..eldest dawThter of G. W. Jordan,_..sq. rbadocs s . M A few day since, r.:Samnel at i (Massachus -t•s t fifth (13°'trey Knight. a Cer .C..ialiarslicisiouslci for B a. „ a PIEV. . - On the 2,1 of December, t Colombo" in the Ifian, lon, Um Right H.Qn. Lady Louisa Rodney. ' ~. . no o , n l t s i l l i e .i 2 ,l :t i h ult. in Hoye.-street, :Idol ° -13rtwe' •sci. Wfiter ort-huiltli s i t,: s a 1 Edinburgh • ~,,, of Beauf On •o''' • .. - , - Ilart 1%il• • astitßi.i.rnoodmii pltio.inn,:.::::ehve,svliilliscli,cid,‘7l-,liro Lately tI . scat, 4 Esq. ..., a _},s _cat, lattenden Parli-, rycrks, frawu, aa . - Ilitrintcd by J. 13. cAttsTAirts! ;"• 7' :to", L(l))NuiDidO::'g:s:: and rathiisli' dny W. A. SCIIIPI'S, of a i(":.:tvies:: at the Sy,N-OFeieg, N.• I 1.'2, Strand ; Where ~,f - p ock aunts, OCl7S,tLett4.;rs (postqa.id); ,Vc. inns: Idet•"t'7 ...