The Sun. — London, England, 1820-07-01 00:00:00

PARMA AI ENT, HOUSE OF LORDS, FRIDAY, JUNE 30. The Royal Assent notified by Commission ter the Lamit (12,000,000 i.) Bill, the Funded Debt Charge Bill, arid others. The Commissioners were the Lord Chancellor, the Al,ngitess of Winchester, and the Earl o► 110.fteshnEv. The Special Conste.hle.' Appointment Bill, the Quatier Sessions Appeal Bi 1, and others were brought up from the (louse of Commons by Lord John Fitzroy, and other Members, and read a first time. A Petition from Ship-otrner3, fitc. of Leith era' estwed by the hill - of RoSSLYN against any al teration iti the - Dillies on Tnnbtr.—Onlered to be referred to the Commitiee on Trk.de. The Court of Exchtquer bill tvas read a thir(l time ai,(l pass-d. The 29,000,000% Exchegiter Bills Bill, the Tithes Comlieusetion (Irelaud) Bill, the Barba does Free Putt Bill, awl the Greenland Fishery Bill, lased through Committees, hail viere reported without aineudineut . .—Atlioutued till Alumfby. HOUSE OF COMMONS. The Devlity Usher of the Black Hod appear ed at the liar, and summoned the House ,t.o the ilottße of Pcets, to hear the Itoyil Assent given by Commissim) to seveial Private lulls. COL( tiEserEit ELEcTIoN. • Mr. FREF,MANTLE brought up the Report of the Col chester Election Committee ; it stated that D. W Harvey, Esq. not possessing the requisite qualifications under the Statute of Queen Anne, was disqua:ified from sitting as a Represent;:tive of that Borough. A New Writ was then moved fur Colchester, in the room of the said D. W. Har vey, Esq. On the motion of Mr. WELLS, the Bili• for preventing frauds on the delivery of Coals, was read a third time, and passed. Mr. H. SUMNER moved fur an Account of certain Monies belonging to the Brides House Ustates.—Ordereti. Lord A. HAMILTON moved that an Innohle Address be presented to his Majesty, praying that there be laid before the House an Account of the 'mintier of Itoyal Burghs (Seot land), which had lost the power to Elect. their Council, since 169 i, specifying those Burghs to which such power had heen restored, and the period of its restoration, and also sheaving whether it was by Royal Warrant or otherwise.—Or dered. Lord NIOUNTCHARLES waved that there be laid before the [-loose a Copy of the Treasury Order to the Excise Board, by which Irish Spirits had been detained iu store, or preveiit ra front consumption in this country; a Copy of the opinion of the Irish Attorney-General on the exclusion of Irish Spi rits from this country; also a Copy of the information upon which a warrant had been granted to search the house of Mr. Wybrants, (Derry) for contraband spirits.—Ordered. The Labourers' Wages Bill was read a third time, and wissed. , _ _ Mr. BEAUMONT presented a Petition from certain per sons in Northumberland, praying Parliamentary Reform.— Laid on the T,►h!e. Mr FL SUMNER presented a Petition from certain Trus tees of Roads in Kent and Surrey against the Nietropolitan Roads' Bill. The Hon. Menilier hoped that this Bill would be read a second time, printed, and allowed to stand over to next Session. Mr: D. - GILBERT entered at considerable length into the reasons which induced the Committee-on Public Highways to propose this measure, The. prosperity and wealth of the country, es well as public convenience, were materially fa tourell• b) the improvement in our highways. ft was now 100 years since turnpikes were established, and the regulation was adopted on the equitable ground of making those coutti-' but e te. the maintenance of the roads who used thorn There was a sum of near three millionscollected annually- for this purpose, and therefore it became it:qui:Co e I hat great toasts should lie instituted, who would employ skilful engineers to keep the roads in the necessary repair. The Committee, in re commending the doing -away with small trusts, meant to cast no imputation whatever on the Commisioners. The Hon. Member, in concluiion, said that he bad no objection to let the Bill stand over to next Session. Sir M. W. RIDLEY wished to know, whether the Com mittee into to propose any reuse dy of the grievance which was felt in the renewal of turnpike trusts, even for a limited period. The expence of such a proceeding amounted at pre sent. to 11-11. in that House, and wlit n the Bill gut into an of fice belonging to another place, the applicants were obliged to make the clauses of a certain length—he would leave it to the House to judge for what purpose—(Hear 1)-11 no meastire of the kind was proposed by the Committee, he should introduce a mition on the subject early in the next. Session." After a few words from Sir W. BURRELL, and Mr. F. LEWIS, the Petition was read and ordered to be printed. MESSAGE FROM THE KING. Lord CASTLEREAGH appeared at the Bar of the House, and stated that he had to deliver a Message from his Ma jesty. Miring accbmingly handed it up to the Speaker, it was read front the Chair, and appeared to he as fol lows : " Tire King acquaints the House of Commons, that part of the provision made by the •Horse of Commons for the main tenance of the different junior branches of the Royal Family Lad ceased, in consequence of the death of his late Ma jesty; the King therefore recommends to his Faithful Com mons to take this subject into their cOnsideration, trusting they will make tire same provision by way of Annuities for his Royal Brothers to au amount equal to %bat they have be fore enjoyed." • Li ) rd CASTLEREAGH then moved, that the House should resolve itself into a Committee of the whole House, on Monday next, to take int o consideration his MAjesty's most gracious Mes sage; which having been agreed to, the Message was ordered to be refe►red to it. IRISH COURT OF CHANCERY ;ILL. Mr. C. GIANT moved the order of the day for the House going into a Committee on this This having been done, Sir J. NEWPURT rose to propose a clause, which he wished to go as an ihstraction to the Committee.. The object of this clause was •to incapacitate Irish Masters in Chancery front hold ing seats in that House. To show the House the necessity of such a clause, be need only bring to his support the Report of the Commissioners ap pohitzd to inquire into the subject. In this oße p rt would be f oun d t h e ev id ence o f one —indivi dual, a Master in the Irish Court of Chancery, who declared it as his opinion that the duties of a hiernber of Parliament were. altogether incompa tible with the ditties of an Irish Master- of Chan cery. Another Gentleman, who filled the same situation, upon being asked what proportion of time the duties attached to the office of Master of Chancery might demand, replied, A i m in, eouse (pence of the 'great increase which had taken place in the bustness of _the . Court'orlate years, the situation required that ten moitiliein the year should be devoted to.them at the least; and 'tbat the office .would afford more or less business for every day in the year. It was a c ,r,Fmarkable fe - ct, and a circumstance which Imioted out more strongly than • any thing else,could do the neces sity of this clause, 7that•ilit;lnXidnal who was, at the . present time, standing for a seat in this House, was the very individual who bad thus ex-, pre.ased himself before :tile Commissioners of In quiry !—(Hear !)—The Hon. Baronet conclodtd by moving, that it be an Instruction to the said Committeee, that a Clause he enacted to provide against any Master in Chancery in Ireland being elected as Member of Parliament whilst he held that office. The question having been put, . . Lord CASTLECREAGH wished to know if he had rightly understood from the lion. Baronet that he intended this measure to operate prospectively The contrary of that would be the only gronnd on which he could be induced to oppose it ; whet wise he Cllly concurred with the Hon. Gentleman. Such an event/as he seemed to have in view cer tainly must be a'. infraction on the duties of one situation or another ; for it was quite iMpo.sible, however different the case might be in England, that an - individual in the situation he had de ,cribed conld he an effective Member of that Muse, and an effective Officer of the Court at the same time. lie perfectly avec(' in the principle of the clause, hut not in the case of its operating as an er post facto law. lie trusted the clause would be so wended as not to affect those who might alteady have acted upon the existing state of things. Sit J. .NEWP,,IIT coulei see no ground for con fining this meisnre to a proTective operation.- -if there should be any Member in that House whom it would affect, he did not see how any one could feel any regret at it. How, indeed, could a Master in Chaticety, who had sworn to rio his dutyin that station, ake upon hirri , elf 8 new si tuation which might Occupy six months annually of kis time, whilst the duties of his first office re quired that he should devote ten nrooths to their due performince ? He must either !rave them In be dime by others in his absence, or oeglec-t them altogether ; and 'lc slid not think such a character deserved much consideration from the House.— (Hear !)—The okject of his motion was, to have a person in the situation of holding these two offices at the same tints, to take his option of re taining or giving up either of them. Mr. SHAW, in allusion to the contest at present going on for the election of a Member in Dublin, observed, that it would be productive of the greatest inconvenience to the parries, r'.•id to the ci'izens there, who hail already gone to a great expence and trouble in carrying on the conrest.— The introduction of this clause, he apprehended, would be the means of creating a new contest. Mr. ABERCRnMBY said, the question for the House to decide upon was, whether they would afford all the suitors in the Court of Chancery in Ireland that chance of obtaining attention to their snits, which no one had ventured to deny they had a right to ask. Mr Ellis, one of the candi dates for the City of Dublin at the present 1110.. went, had himself declared that the duties of his office required that he should devote ten months of each year. How then could any one have the face ro start op, and ask for any consideration for hiui ? The Hun. Gentleman said, that he asked it in behalf of the citizens of Dublin, but he (Nlr. Abercroniby) pleaded in behalf of all the inhabi tants of Ireland, who were to be deprived of their just rights, in older to indulge the personal autbi- - lion ot xn individual. Sir M. W. RIDLEY spoke in favour of the clause. Mr. CANNING said, his Noble Friend (Lord Castlereagh) did not mean to object to the pro position that a Master of the Irish Court of Chan cery should' not sit in that [louse. lie ap,,te bended, that all he meant by wishing the mea sure to act in a prospective manner only, was that in the event of a case arising, in which an individual, - holding the situation of Master in Chancery shoold be elected after the passing of this Bill, he might be allowed to have the choice of giving up which ever of two situations he might think fit - . In the case of the Dublin Elec tion, it would, be seen that by excluding all Mas ters of Chancery from the capability of being elected, the effect would he to reader the election • null and void. Itut if the clause made it optionsl, the election would hold good till the decision of the Member should be given. _ Sir JOHN NEWPORT said, the objvct of the clause he should propose in the Committee would be to the effect '' that it he enacted that no per son appointed to the office of Master of Chan. cery in Ireland should b e a ll o wed to hold a seat, or give a vote in that House, so long as' he held that office." Alr. CANNING though►, then, they were all agreed on this subject. . _ Sir G. HILL said it was the first time such a thing had ever been proposed to that House, as to pass a resolution which should have the effect Of concluding an election then pending, for this was the light in which he viewed the Hon. Ba ronet's proposition, and he had meant to ask him wlrether he had not better extend Ins pro posal to the effect that Mr. Ellis should give up the contest for the City of Dublin in favour. of Mr. Grattan ? With all hi 3 humble might and power he protested against this Resolution, go ing, es it did, to disqualify a Gentleman from sit ting in that House, after lie had gone so far into an animated and difficult contest. He maintain-, eti, tl►at to pass such a Ilsolution with this elec tion pending, would be an outrage upon the Con stitution, and upon eve; y principle of fairness and candour. Sir J. MACKINTOSH said, he did not rise to make many observations on this subject. He should not inquire how it might be consistent with the Constitution, with fairness and candour, or even with common sense, that a man should occupy two situations, which he himself declared to be incompatible with each other.—(Hear, hear !)—The Hon. Baronet (Sir G. Hill) com plained that no notice was given to his Learned Friend that he would not be allow( d to hold these two situations. In admitting the tru.h of this ;assertion, he must, however, remind the Hon. Baronet, that that Learned Gentleman had not omitted to give them notice that it is impossible for him to hold these two situations.—(Cheers.) — The Lion. Baronet said, there was some novelty in thiS case. It was true the case did possess this extraordinary novelty, that they were told front the mouth of the Learned Gentleman himself, that he ought not, under the commonest principle of right or propriety to do that which he was now doing, and whicis be found advocates in that House to pioad iu insti6cat:on of. Ile conl , l nnt contemplate for one monie%.t, that the House would endure such a state of things. So shame less a principle, if it even deserved the nine of principle, had never before been propounded to that House, to call upon them to sanction that a man should neglect the most sacred duties he owed to his felloq , countrymen and to mankind. In conclusion, he must say, that such a proposi tion was the most absurd and monstrous that was ever offered to any public assembly. Lord CAsTLERRAGH declared that he had no in tention - of wishing to affect the pemding election. It would be open to the Committee to lake care either that the measure should or should not aflect it. After a few words from Mr. Ca'croft, Mr. VS 7 vnn, and Sit George Hill j the Motion was agreed to, and the House resolved itself into a Commit tee, in ivhiel, the Bill was gone through, the blanks filled up, and a number of slight altera tions made. On btioging forward the clau►sc on which the oeb.ite had taken place, Colonel Barry and Mr. DAly opposed it ; and Doctors Phillip►ore and Lusuington supported it, on tl►e grounds plevi.. ously stated. ,fir. Not.Atst said, that in his opinion, Whitt - ertr were the met its of the principle, the bring ing forward the prlvo.ition at present, and with reference to piesent circumstances, was disgrace. ful to Parliament. Suppose the claim: , allec!ed a Nlember who had already taken his seat—what would be thought of any measure to disqualify him ? Yet this was a similar case, and seemed directed against an individual though brought forward opportunely as a general principle rn l ght, however, have ( f iends who would do Lis Chancery duly for hint while necesAittily ab sent; and it not, had not the Court of. Chancery its own remedy against hint it he neglected his duty ? As an ex post facto measure, and perso n:ll in its opplicat on. he could not but thilik the present one of the hat sliest and most unjust ever offered to the Ilouse. Mr. R. MARTIN was in favour of the clause. It one Master in Chancery was eligible to be elected, why' might not all ihr others be chosen, and then for Lett tnt,tttl,s the bII.•,IIIESS of the hist., Chancery ;Vonid stand still. Mr. IVILLIAms spoke on the same side. Colonel BARRY observed, that the incongruity bet ween the two offices was not found out I dst year, when the Bill went through the Commons to the Lords. Air. Bllis had bought his place for 10,0001. when it was saleable, which by law it was no lon ger. lie could not have contemplated that hold ing it would shut him out limn Parliament, and yet this would he the effect of legislating upon vested rights in his person. Sir JOHN NE%IPORT and Mr. MARTIN eX pla Med. Mr. NOLAN noticed, that in all other disquali fication Bills their operation did not date till . the Parliament atter they were agreed to. SIR JAMES MACK4NTOSH supp,;rted the clause, as remedying an evil, now for the first time pre sented. Mr. itVROTT6SLRY said that sifting in ParHA tnent was n'ot an office, but a trust, and that tinst was between Mr. Ellis and his constituents. The principle of this night's algtiment was carried too tar. It might be applied to Officers in the Army mid Navy, and great iticouvenience be intro- Mr. BARING said, tie difference was that Mr. Ellis's Office was - pernranent and regniredeonstagt attendance, while Officers in the Army arid Navy, though 4 bsent for a period, might letutu ro their Parliamentary duties entirely. Sir JOSEPH Yoatut observed that Officers of the Army and Navy bad no suitors whose inte rests depended on their attendance. Lord PALM RSTON stated, that the general principle of exclusion from Parliament .was di rected against Officers under the influence of the Crown, with whiCh the present case had uothing to do. But it was proposed 'on the ground of other duties which Mr. Ellis had to perform.— Where was this to stop ? The same rule may be made to apply to Officers of the Army or ,Navy serving abroad. "%Vas the [louse then ready to admit a principle which would imply ioquiry into the public or private duties by which any of its Members might be prevented from attending ? This would be a dangerous precedent. Mr. M. FITZGERALD was to the clause. Lord CASTLEREAGH tbutlght the measure should Hot be re'rospective, but admitted the principle as fit to be supported by an Address, which it would be difficult for any Minister to advise the Crown to reject looking. to Mr. Ellis's own. evidence. Mr. ABERCROMBY detailed the important func tions of a Master in-Chancery, and thought them iuconsisten[ with a seat in Pat liament. Mr. FOSTER stated, that during the time !le had sat in Parliaine►it, be recollected that it bad been discussed whether persons of a religious profession Would I►old seats in tl►at House. It had been de , termined that they should not ; but with the ex press proviso that that decision should not affect those who had seats at the time, nor dining the whole existence of that Parliament. Mr. Macporraw stated, tlral tl►e case of Horne Tooke, alluded to by the . Right Hun. Gentleman, was very different from the present-, as Mr. Horne Tooke injured nobody by sitting in Patliament till its close, whilst any Master in Chancery, who should neglect the functions of office for a seat, might occasion much inconvenience and injury. 'Die clause having been agreed to, Colonel. BARRY proposed to add another clause, preventing any . person Who should have been elected previous to the passing of / this Act, front being affected by its operation. Atter a few words from Mt. V. Fitzgerald and Sir J. Mackintosh, the amendment was put and negatived without a division. ' • CRIMINAL LAWS. On the motion of Sir J. Mackintosh, the House went into► Committees on the Pf vately Stealing in Shops, and the Capital Felonies Bills.—Re ports on Monday. 'fl►e Muse then resolved into a Committee on the Capital Felonies Comm►►tation Bill, when Sir J. MACKINTOSH stared, that on more mature consideration, it was his intention to with►lraw certain clauses out of that Bill, The two first %tete those *Lich related to Nigel n, ti tiecoveri e , / and In Marriage Registers, Marriage Licences Certificates. This he should do on the principles that offences connected with those (totte rs ' amounting to personation and forgery, ought to . come into one general Act, and that he inten ded to propose such an Act next Session. The other clause which he wished to omit related to Coo' victs returning from transportation in eases is Mitch the Revenue had been defrauded, as be did not see why any difference should be made be tween such convicts and others. Those were the only dirt e clauses which he was desirous of witt", drawing ; on the rest h e should take the sense of the House. Several clauses were then agreed to. 01) that for removing capital punishment id, cases where cattle had been Maliciously matMeu and wounded, Air. CliEttvl - Nto expressed his apprehension lest . the removal of capital punishment for such offence should lead to their being more frequently cow mitted. lie therefore suggested the propriety of leaving it to be inflicted at the discretion of tha Judge. After a desultory convetsalion between the At.. torney General, Mr Lp)ckitart, Mr. Hatbord, Martin of Galway, SirJ. Yorke, Mr. Scarlett, and Sir J. Mackintosh, the clause was agreed to. The House resumed, and the Report was re ceived, and ordered to be taken into further Cow sidetation ott Monday, and the Bill, as ameisdai to be printed. LINEN BOUNTIES ACTS. The Repot t of the Committee un the Linen' Bounties Act was brought-tip by Mr.MABERLEY. The Resoltitions untie: writ a diNuussiu:4, in which Mr. Maberley, Mr. Robinson, ''`" G. 11i1i, Mr. Home, Mr. Forster, Sir R. Ferguson, Nlr. 141. 0 " hisson, aril Mr. Ricardo, partuipated, which tef minat , d ttte first resolution being i!!. , ,feed to. The SUCIaI(I and tbo . " re-olutions were negatiird, and a Bill ordered to 1) 4 brought in on the l';rst. BALLOTS. Lord CASTLEREAGH gave notice, that on Monday fin would submit a motion to the Ilouse respecting the 1121/1 foi Election Committees. It was Isis intention to propose 0 4 e the Ballots which were appointed f o r n e at w ee k should taken in the order in which they stood, hut that those w h ie i were fixed fur a more diAilut period slo.uld be pt.e,tprscri tt a future session. MARRIAGE AMENDMENT ACT. Dr. PHILLIMORE hrouglit'up the Report of the 1 421' riage Act Amendment Bill. Dr. LUSHINGTON opposed the Bill, and concluded 14 moving. ' that the Bill be re-committed. Mr. WARREN secondvd the motion. After a few observations from Dr. Dodson, Mr. PA° ef Gilltert, and Dr. Phillimore, the House divided 0 0 ' ll°' Amendment, For re-committing the Bill 23 Aadirist it . k i The proposal for re-committing the Bill being negatictli" l a majority of 21. the. Report was !recited, and the Bill urde' d ed to he read a third time on Monday. On the motion of the CHANCELLOR of the CHEQUER, the House on its rising agreed to atljnurr4 to Monday. SUPPLY. The House then went into a Committee of Supply,i9 b i • Lord Palmerston moe d the SUM 309,1•:::191. be grauteu to - 4 Majesty to defray the charges o f disemb o died Militia ill f " : " f . latid.---The Resolution was agreed to.' The sum of 10,2E/61. was also voted to defray the charges disembodied Militia in Ireland. Also, 30,0001. for defraying the charges of Yeomans . ) , IP Ireland. On the motion of the CHANCELLOR of the EXCII f " QUER, the sum of 26,0001. was granted to his Majesty charges in the Office of the Ordnance for ISO. CALEDONIAN CANAL. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved 60,0001. he granted to tiefrzty the evence of the Caletluto4ll" Canal. • Sir J. YORKE considered the som insufficient to cottlP itg the undertaking, which he described tobea Scotch job. La.rd BINNING had no doubt Ilu! intended -Canal iot" turn out ben e ficial t o th e t ra d e o f t h e con 111 Cy. The WOK , ' was equal to I eXpectiee. Thu Canal was made at t he stance of most of the commercial towns in Scotland. land, and England. It would he capable of holding triP te • of 32 guns. Lord ALTHORP objected t o th e G ran t, as an cstraraefji,: waste. of - flaunty. SiCH. 'PARNELL doubted whether the sum pr oP° 54 would' he sufficient. 1 Sir J. YORKE said it would ta!:e at least . 4 6 . 001. more. consequence of a defect in the work it wat in Cellte[ll43l - cht thrown rocks under water. 10" Mr. HUM E expressed an opinion that the tolls t-° collected would never defray the r%pense of the Canal. • The Resolution was then agreed to. IRISH ESTIMATES. Mr. CHAS. GRANT moved rie - sum o f glol be . , . • 0 gunned to his Majesty.tbr the Protestant Ch ar t er Scha o ; 4 Ireland. Mr. HUME said it was most desirable Ihe motel P 2 O . posed should be applied in a p ro p er wa y. No p i e ferri should be shewn in -those schools to children on account religion. _A Mr. GOULBURN sr,' I, the money was to be ripplk%,.,. Id purposes of general education, without the least effect view to malie proselytes. • f Sir. H. PARNELL having r ece iv e d c o mm un i c ations J o k the Clergy on the subject of these schools, was desirous 0 1 , ,0 feting obseivations, whi c h th e House might not be at hour prepared to hear ; he therefore expressed a hope' the Resolution might he postponed. Sir. GRANT•suggested that the Hon. Baronet might alp advert to the subject when the Report was received. The Resolution was then agreed to. Anions: the.other items of expenditure were— L. 1.2000 for Stationery. • 4,000 for Lying-Inn HospitAl. 5,500 for the Education of the Poor, On the first of these sums Mr, C. GRANT stated, th,.. 3 of examination was now c a rrying ott, which wou ld vio u ' tend to decrease the amount under this head. re The House resumed; and the Report was ordered to "- ceived on Monday. NEW STREET BILL Ou the motion for going itito-a Committee on this Bi Mr. Hifi:HOUSE stated that he had t petition to Pr e : 3 ot respecting this Dill, praying for the introducti o n of a cCri t ld clause, hut uwint to the thin state of the House, he - d ig . 1 prefer presenting it at any other stage of the Bill, if that c u be done conformably with the rules of the House. The SIPE:IKE!: said that the petition might be pres e iwg with the tame effect at any' of the subsequent stages 4 Bill. 01/ The House went into the Committee, and the Rtpo rt ordered to be reck:ived un Monday next. THE CORONATION. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER. gave n° d id that on Nlonday next, in a Committee of Supply, be " ' e w° submit the estimates of, and prop.se a vote for the esP of the approaching Coronation. THE PRESS. tte r% 9 Mr. HUME said, that as he understood the new — o ° o -,0 Bill contained some clauses which' went to fetter the Pr v he would more that those be printed. After a few stIO Nom the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the raotio" agreed to. fla • for the Mr. LUSH INGToN got leave to bring in a fill fol dirt of the Clonial Acconnts. 0114 e'other Or o ders of the Day were then disposed 0 the House adjourned considerably after Two o'Clock. cob" ..kboor !en 0',..10ck on 'flalrsd +v night the ",01 ning in the Metropolis suss Mort than has been .1,13 1 ; 0 0' fur a number of years,l accompanied by loud clap s °ft Ho rse . der. Its effects were felt at tO miles distance, and the , 0 1, ; in several of the mails were lintel' frighten - ed. It co ti riogi‘ tw accompanied by cisiorial showers of rain, till fo ur °G yesterday morning. ; Cii ol LONDON: Printed by .1. B, CARSTAIRS, of No. 2 ." W. Ormond-street, Queen-square; and published fns Ss SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South Nloitoo-street, at r Ott Mice, No. 112, Strand ; where Acirettiserneni s o Let;sre, (Sc. (post- r aid) must be addressed. xt, ; - • - • • - . _ rfur ill u 4, '~~ ith .iiit PC) 4411;:rirao '.44Nissic RON I ) his pe~isiiig" tanc, * Wer of ill the the lt PPear p,„ 1144 Crrtij ;!i(1 , ii‘stloili it ata th e eat tf "Cl th e ,ui ra z ,` ) ge av4ii 1.1 1(1‘e h M rOri 11 Th, s 41 11 . / , u4y. b 1 l bose gir Y, wi t e .1% 1 1:: d Ay. 4101)1:1.414e t utit , 4 tt.rfi l ., : ii rl t s 4 : l: 2 IL" ""vis e 1, 4 : l ' lt tt i ll il 4 liy e 7iLti l , R ..*4." 4 atf‘ t tat i tt ' l t k th t I ‘ , ) . tiu:vl of - Ntii i. tely t tr, Ng t I l id 4 e "cl t 4 K ti,: s . ! I r 4 til4 fu *, ~ lifrl l l ; kirk e i r t s , Isi t fsl S vrarl , .z Tv • p J o , h t ,„ M, :tu l ; s, N .Nl: r t rlt Y ' 4 (. ""ta ' • Ri•,, t _Faso a tt ,! , t(l l) 1)i 4 .) o'' ll l-1 31 .1 1, 1 • rim 144 Y e,