The Sun. — London, England, 1824-12-16 00:00:00

( av ii- 1 7: Yit":, - . ",: 1 ;•.- . S. Ili:VI ) li i ) ,•)' t l ",, a, 1„,;;.- 7 --,e- i eNi,i' " 7 : •.. ,•,. ..« ...4.• ' IA ',7..., CI ' \:l4w. • --br 1,/,:i. A*, -4; • -- 41 1' , r,"•''''' ' ♦• .t. : .. i I. ; . ,: , , ~..,:, ~,, . . , ~, - ~.,t , .. - 1 , , z ;',''' ~,i i .. f ..... ,:..) ~.- ! :.. .- -.1 , ; t'.-; ; c,,, -., ;sr -1.,, . / 4! ..- ..' ....c., ....i ,i3..4,, i , .i . , , , . • . 1 J.. ..._„ . : ( t i 7. l 4 —, '' . 1 ' 4 : , ii ;# si ift 1 1'; .“I 'k , i,i . ',', '„„ ' '', i i -- ',.. t.l'e " i''. F. i , <...,,,,14 . f,* l . ; ; 1 M t ~, t - , , '' .AI 1 , 4 A ;- • . ' v • m ~t,; ....;.., _ . 4 ""'" a , zn--- , • . -•• 11 -, ,0 , -: r . $ ti" 1 ' • e,/,_ ( 4,„, • ~ . •' 1 ' * *'" ' / ''''' 4e f 'ticp. 4111,, ,; ,-. *t i: e . ,;:t u i: ' ', i! . ,::: . . : - ( r ~,/,.J., ,- i, ,`. , ii.ll 4.4 .....- ,i - . I.'i 111z.e,g(tret. . , E ~ j /~ f ~~ Num - it ER 10,006. THURSDAY EVENING, •D CEMBER* 16, 1824. " 1 f • 1!1 . 1 " : ' PRICE SElTElqpltlter.,: VP ItY FAsT :114,1yELLING, ToBIRMINGIIAM rind LIVERPOOL, DAY and NIGHT, by FO TIC INSIDE COACHES. which KEEP GOOD TIME, from the SARACEN'S HEAD, INN, SKINNER STREET, SNOW-HILL. LONDON. Tfollowipg LEGIIT. POST-COACHES, AL. and MAILS; & c. set 'out from f or above. Inn BIRMINGHAM " Tally. Ho !" fast Day Coach, in thir teen hours, Morning at alquarter before Seven, through Red burn, Mtirket Street, Dunstable, Briekhill, Penny Stratford, Stoney Strntford.Towcester,,Weedon, Daventry, ttunchureh, Coventry, and Stone Bridge, to the Castle Hotel and St. li eorge s Tavern, Iligh• street, Birmingham, to Sniffnall, Bridgenorth, Shelton, Shrewsbury, Oswestry, Santwich, Tarporley, Bangor, Chester, and folyhead.— briven th roug h w i t h t wc , Coachmen only. In consequence the decided preference given to the Tally Ho Coach, the Proprietors are determined no expence shall be spared to render it the first conveyance on the Birmingham Road. BIRMINGLIAM "Royal Express," New light fast Night Coach, in 15 hours only, sets out every afternoon, early. 1 4‘ Four inside on lyt "passes though Warwick, Learning , t?n, South:on, Weedon, Daventry, Stoney Stratford, and , I tmec.der, to the Saracen's Head, ' Bull-street, Mooin g . nam, early the next Morning. illtosurroN, Chatham, Rochester, Gravesend, Stroud, Sittingbourne, Rainham, a nti Ospringe, every Nloroing. BA lINS'PAPLE, Solo Ismislton, Creditor', Tiverton. Nort h. lawton, Oakhanipi on, Torrington. Chumleigh, Iltracomb. and Biddeford, New light fast Coach, every Morning, at 7. BATH and Cheap Post-Coaches, through ( . 711 / 1 1,- t i tll _ l l"T, Caine, Marlborough, Ho rigerford, Newbury, and I : . " l4 iLg* every Afternoon at one; arrive ;At the Greyhound .;9, Bath, the Lond on Tavern, Thomas-street, avern, Thomas-seet, and Swan, I%tent, early the next :Morning. At reduced Fares. ROS'I'ON New Royal Patent :Mail to Louth, through . Ve• 'ston Cambridge, Huntingdon, Stilton, Peterborough, Spalding, Spilsliy, Alford, and G, i tisby, Evening, "` r : 1 : If past 7, Sunday, at a Quarter before. 7. • A MBRIDGE New Royal Patent Mail, through tVare, 1 2 antingfiard; Rockland, and Royston, Evening, at half past 1, Yi, i ndaY, at a (quarter before 7. " Express," to Penrith, and Whitehaven, "eew Light Four-inside Poit Coach, with a Gnat II all passes through Appleby, !trough, Bowes, Greta ,;"l,ge Richmond, Catterick, Boroughbridge, Ferrybridae, .4:m.ll,c:titer, Newark, Hawn v, Grantham, Stamford, Gree ‘::' Biggleswade, and llalilock. - Sets out in the li t ,. •and perfht !lie journey :with the greaten taci at reioced Fares. Passeng-ertrietained on the Itoad )).)• !se u ltt sinett oi plltittre, have the liethi advantage isf their being secured t he next Cuach.—The . only direct poach toCarlisl e • 'Li . ght Coaches to Newport; Whitecluirch, Tar- . r - neY, Naniptwich, Mot liwich, and Nliddlewich, every morn ing and afternoon. ' • I() VEN'I'ItY " Tall II " I' It fast- Da C o nc hs, • Tally o,y eve i) slet!riming at a quarter before 7, through Walborn, Dom:table, uncY Stratford, w st .r Weedon,Daventry, and Dun -1,1401.0 err ' • • .„, Ell New light Day Coaches,- in fourteen hours ,Y, through. Bagsbot, !Backwater, , Basingstoke, Overton, I,,nitchureli, Andover, Salisbury, Woods eats, Cashimire, and "!nidford, at a quarter past 5 and 7 in the morning. • e•XF4F,IL" Sovereign, •• New light fast Coach every morn ngat 7 O'Clak, through Hondo!). Axminster, Charnimit s!'"liort, Dorchester, IllandfOrd, Woodeates Salishory, iu ckliriilge, Sutton, Basingstoke, filaCliwoicr. and Itagdwi• *LASGOW, Longtown,Gretnit-green ,•Annan, Dumfries, r owohill, Thornhill, Sanmiliar-Kiln, Cann-trick, Kingswell, mid all Parts of Scotland, a light. Four inside Post Coach daily. ~!!AItit()WCIATE and Ripon new Light Post Coaches, every %Nen ...it mm tiartet, Fivt}t in the, Pdgrain y I Fol{o Cinicl4 ) 11111-Mgt) tt until r" s "1 . "olil e s s l orm . d Ware. ' HOLY 1 - 1 FAO New light fast Day Coach, throng!' lliiilge li, Witleal, Shrewsbury, every morning. mLY H KAI) New tight fast Night coach, !trough Uridge- Walsall, Shrewsbury, and satimp; every aft ern • jHULL" Express," a New Light Post coach, to Lincoln, ou t th ea re, Howden, and Doncaster, every Morning. to the t 142 Eeys, M ar ket-place, Hull and also the " Rocking. i, "liid" in the Affernoms at Two. NENI)Ar. Light fast. Post Coaches to Lancaster, Preston, Bolton, choriey, Otmskirk, and Garstang, .'ery moinin. , and afternoon. Stimurbridge, and Dudley, through ::iliningliarn, and West Broir.w iell, li g ht Coaches every morn afternoan. LEEDS Rockingham," light Post Coach, sets out " .e rY Afternoon •at Two; and passes through Bahlock, Big. V e swade, Eaton, Btichden, Stilton, Wansford, Stamford, Lretliam, Grantham, Newark, 'Vox fond; Markham Moor, tfotd Dawtt'y,Doncaster, and Ferrybridge, :Arrives at the men LiOn liin,...Leeds, ne xt Afternoon at Three, in time ' I ! the Brad Shipton, and Huddersfield Coach es. through with Four Coachmen only.—Luggage "ffli ilckaps only 4d per In.—Notwithstanding the uncommon of this Coach it is alloivid to be the most agr ee de and dete • Public Conveyance on time •Nortlt Road, , COnli • unequalled by ally other. • bIVERPOOL_anti. Staffordshire Potterie s N ew li g ht- fast • tY Conch, every morning at a quarter before 7. ~LlVEttpooL. Cimipire," New • light • fast Four In s i de in 27 hours only, (hut.one,Night on the.ltoad),.sete • 4 ' l "` 11 / 4 4 at One; • and arriees at Liverpool next afternoon,s I "iigli Woburn, Lathbory, Northamp ton, Welford, Lot 1, Hillehley,Atheritonei Litchfield,Stune, Newcastle, ;iitstora, warriggton, and Pi ascot, , • , • I,,OVERPOOL" Royal Express, " New light Four Inside tt Coach, in 27 h o urs only, through IVarrisigtoni Pres. Coughs - ion, Lawton, Novcasile,..ltugely,.. Knotsford, • 1: 411 e, Stall'ord, and Litch fi eld, (only One Night on ice i n g adi, every Afternoon poolr at, the sail Heat D'lte.' a ree s t , Li, ei , next Afternoon. 'llse ans i t '.•l to 'iraceilbrs who. lionitiir this Coach with their pre: - ' r ktlet are far superior to any ollirr on this Road, especially !'.Cetuniercial Interests, a , it performs the journ e y in less 11 41 ' than anY Oilier Cone , ' ; and, notwithstanding its cheap 1 414 and eiiipeditien,'the Proprietors pledge themselves that 1 4fety and accommodation it is equalled by few, and shall , % ,"rseil by none. c t'A 'CHESTER quid Altringham New light very fast Day j I ►,eve'tuorning to the Muscly Arms and Swan Inn. I . SI INCIiESTER to Winslow, Coogleton , Newcastle , WM. 't 'Wolverharanton, and Enutsford, - light Four Inside wchcs ki bth. iI , BOROUGH and Swindon, four . inside Day Coach, ar "utit► Maidenhead, Reading;;Newbory,Hmingerford , Y, :int! Aldbourit Driven through with One Coachman M . T . 7 , 5 1111 u The nearest convey:lnce to•Lantboort),:Piatun, F Vtrti and Pewscy. . . tr tn ," CASTLE 1.:•1 1 t . .4 . yNE and UNDER LNE Coaches P4 ll ""ing and afternoon. Only. One t i t Nigh n the road. mp o . MOUTH t , Sovereign," New light fast Coach, to Fal. )i t ' l l y t t ll o. ,.T f rurn, Pearyn, Ashburton, 'l'otness, and I,milmott, every morning at 7.• C 4 i te laistiATE " Royal Telegraph," New superior fast safe Pe. ' 1 10 Margate, Dover, Deal, Rioadstairs, Canterbuty, ir i ze .rshatti,.attit Sandwich—every Morning at tialf.past 7. letal se quence of the decided preference given to the Te 41it "le Coach, the Propriet o r s are determined no Ott shall he spared to rendes if the first tainveyance acid It • • ot . t h m F IELD " EsUress," and also " The llocliingliami" tmeT t - tto Rotherham, New Four inside Post Couches; 'every sICE and afternoon. • tqatlit.r•WSßUltY, Wellington, and Shilfital, Light Post. NOti. i ' every morning and afternoon._Gullriled. !'il los I :HAMPTON " Union,'" to Lymington, Lyndhurst , :Isk ti u t ;tier, Basingstoke, Hartford Bridge, Black water, and w 'm New Four ! w i c k comas, every morning, and ar. t h st - 1 : 1 :the Coach -and Horses and •Vine Intl, South:imp ire• This' is a most delightful Conveyance to of Bri lit J • se Gnernsev, St. Maloes, Havre he ce, g , y. t Odch "erhourgii, Hoe I toptie ors of the . abi . ive hi t ° Pe for sa colitilitiallCC of that signiori which i;ecl t •Mrto been experienced since the commencement of 'ORI~SHIRR parry.RiEs, a new light very fast ri l i ht ' e4l.very afternuon, lo tomcod, Stoke, Shelton, But slem, °My c44clt Lawton, Han ly and Holmes Chapel. 'lbis is time • hid i r r,ct to t he Potteries. ahl POli g h t t i R-- P os t (; ouches every niorningamoid after -4lNib trough Baldock. Bi gs i e swade, St. Neat:, Bucktlen, 4eNr.):. SWUM, 'and Wandsfurcl. 4 " 41 tX.4140 ) sl.4.ielstors, and Yoram Light Post Coach every Morning, to the George hut, souvionittlid; at reduced Farri. TOTTENHAM and Edmonton Coaches daily, at Eleven, Half-past Two, Fire, and Eight o'clork. WAKEFIELD Four inside Post-Coaches, every Morning and Afternoon, at reduced Fares. AVARWICK and Leamington Day aad Night Coaches, through Darentry, Verdun, Towcestcr, and Money rat ford. WELLS, Bridgewater, Taunton, Falmont and Ply. mouth Coaches, and to all Parts of he West isf England. WEYMOUTH " litgnet" Ciiach, through Bagshist, Black water, Basingstoke, Overton, Whiteloirch, Andover, %%rood, ytats, Cashmore, Salisbury, Illandford, and Dorchester, at a Qinirter past Fis'e o'Cloek In the Morning. Driven throu4h with Two Coachmen WEYMOUTH - PACKETS to Goternse),. Jersey, Cher bourg, St. Maine's, &c. every Wednesday and Saturday 4if tcrimon, at Two, from Weymouth. '• WOLVEREANIP ['ON only Day Coach . . to Dudley, West Bromwich, and Meriden, through Coventry —Morning, at a quarter before 7, and every afternoon. • • YORK I , Express," to Searlairough, Whitby, Shields, Sun derland, Newcastle, and Ktlinhorgh, at New light F.lir inside Post Coach, with a Guard throughout t sets nut every Nlorniug by way of Newark, Itetford. Doncaster, Fer. ryliridge, Tadeaster, Darlingtrin, Northallerton, Durham, N - loi ?et and Berwick, and arrives at York next Morn. ing. at reduced dares. Driven through with Four Coach. Mell only. Passengers finding, themselves fatigued on the journey, may rest what time they please, and then proceed witliont any additional Fare. At Reduced Fos es to Itamfig au, Margate, and Cant er- Int r y. S. A. MOUNTAIN and Co. respectfully acquaint their. Friends and the l'Ultile, 041 they will ow; he accountable fur any Parcels. Passenger's Luggage, Writings, Plate. ikc. of, nowt , than Five Pounds Value, if lost, stolen, or damaged, 'inlets entered as such, and the Insurance paid accord.' i nal'', at the Saracen's Head Inn, Skinner-street. Snow-hill, Loa/Jur.. PII'7'V.II,LINGT-OFFICE. Nor. Hp 1,424. THE COMM ISS TO NE RS fur V IGT-Grd L 1, !NG His 3/.4.1 EST Y'S cYr. : d" hre' 6l - g irr Notice, that on,•Taexday,-.llw-ebth January-nest, they will be ready to receive Tenders in writing (resist/ up), and treat for the _following' goantitit4 muric and QUEBEC sTAvEs:, . • r pc CROWN DA wzic Onindy. . t I Ingsbead EM EL Pipe Hngsbrad 90 20 sTErrIN I Parcel A Long Heading . 341 QUEBEC Pipe .!/I the Quebec Staves, and one-half of the others, (o le de livered at Deptford, and the other half, in equal 'unities, at Portsmo,tth am! Plymouth ; the Quvbce Stares to he a/I de livered by the 30th Septemher, and the others, ope• half by the 80th September, and the other 4alf by the 0 131 L i e . "" bet, ols .;,,, 1413.• r 114 Atigi 7'he Conditions of the Contract rnati.he seen at D Ore: Each Tender .mitst specify Me Price in word* nt length, anti he delivered ~before One e'Cloch on the (lag appointe : and thc•Person rrlra ntahrt" the Tender, or some Persrm on his heAng u ntsist rivrioNEßY OFFICE, LONDON, - DeC. 7,152 i. TUE COMP'rROLLER. of the srA= TIONERY OFFICE is ready to receive TEN oFits for ditrc , "it ticsciiPtions of PA4O I MENT and VELLUNI required for the Public Service. The quantities ju be contracted fur, and the periodi of , their delivery, will be specified 10 the Particulars of Contract, which can be procured, and Samples of the Art Meg •rievri-d; at the Stationery °dirt:, from Monday, thi VOll. of Decem ber, to Saturday, the 29th of January next, between the hours of Ten and Three. ,11....1 f, The Tenders to he addressed to the Comptroller of his flu jesty's Stationery Office, 'James-street, Buckingham Gate, and to be delivered byTwelveo'Clock in the day, on Monday, , she 31st of January, 1815, marked on the corner " Tender for Parchnient and VellOm," after which day and hour no 'render clot be received. . ENGLISH GENTLIM AN. ON SUNDAY, the tOth iastattl, a NPW Journal, under Ow Style and 'ritle of the " ENGL.'S t OF,NTI,KMAN," will be first published, by lE,DWIto, DIXON I'OtICIIEF., at N 0.7, iirykes-street, Covent-gar .lell.—To be had of. every News•vender, price Sereopeoce, TO BM SOLD BY AUCTION. By Mr SOTHEBY. at his Huisse. No. t, WELLINGTON• STREET, STRAND,on FRID. AY, December 17. ISM and Four following Days (gutitlay excepted). at Tiv.lve 01100 , E AIICIIITECT URAL IA BR A ItY I . THOMAS AYFERR, Etat . retiring from Dosines, to which is added, the SMALL. LIBRARY of im CLERGY MAN, deceased, including .Folio.—Speed's Britain, with maps, '2 vol .; Stukeley's fltonehenge and Abitry. 9 vol. in 11 Dogilale's History of : Brandt's History of the Reformation, 4 vtd. ; Ar chitectural and Monumental Drawings; Dopiti%; Ecclesiasti cal Writers, 16 vol. .(Itoitto.—Brittutt's Architecluenl Antilinit'es of England. conipkte in Numbers; Holy Bible, by Doyley and Mato 16 , P a rts, latge paper ; Holy Bi b l e, b y Ilewlet, 3 vol ; Con prirre's Universatllingraphy, &e. &c. Octavo.—Roscoe,s Life of Lorenzo de Medici, 4 vol.; Mi chaelis' on the Testiuttent, by Marsh, 6 vol. ; poddeidg,', Ex. positor. $Ol. Ste. Together with a t oad Collectilfen of Class 'cc To be viewed, and eatalogsses (price Is, 6d.) had at the Place of 641 c. A NV I N 'r ENC E. COURT OF CHANIJARV, DEc. iii. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. AT Tim RELA TION OF THE CORPORAIiION OF LIVERPOOL. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL Malted for un injunction to re strain the defendant from enekta in g about three acres of marsh land, which are washed b y the flux and reflux of the tide on the banks of the river Mer se y , and thereby tending to prevent the .waters from scouring the bed of the river. Mr. HORNE and Mr. ROUPELL followed on the same side. Mr. SHADIVELL Mr. SPENCE opposed the motion. The holm CHANCELLOR, at the conclusion of the argu ment, gave a luminous outline of the general doctrine. The King held the right of highways and of flyers as a sort of high ways on the waters for the benefit of the whole community.' There could be no right set up against his title, which was to hirn for all his subjects; nor would ever so great is number of pO r presillrer whether legally or illegally a dvanced, or project ed, upon the banks of a stream, for any body of precedent or doctrine against that paramount title. What might be stiffer.: ed, or what not, within the limits of this right, was another question. According to the judgment of the Attorney-Ge neral and Johnson , " which Was a ease of encroachment on the Ranelagh side of the banks of the Thames, the nuisonep was found, although . pourprertures of a character manifestly encroaching prevailed on both hanks trot above that point as far as the Isle of Dogs. There was is case now pending which would be argued with a view to new trial, in the Court of King's Bench next Term, where the question of an exec = tion on the hanks of the Tyne to facilitate the loading of, coals at Newcastle. The defence was, -that the build. ing was one of public utility, and that there was free, and uninterrupted, and ample room left for the navigation of vessels going up or down. Judge Bayley •had given his no tion of the general doctrine in , a -manner which corresponded with 'the high respect which was paid to his opinions (no• one felt higher respect for them tha n i t i mse miheliord ChanC.ellor.) His opinion was; that the qu es ti on o f nn i s anee where the King's right attached merely for the public benefit Coal only be de. termined by. the convenience or. damage of the public. • And certainly . * notion' had got into his (the teriteletticellor'o head ' upon tuat•case of" Attorney General v. Johnson,"•• that there could not be any safe ground for procetxlings nsture in these cases without first suing out a writ of qupd thimmint in the first instance, in which the King, -as the' repre sentative of the. whole people, was made prosecutor,' Por •as to the right of individuals to prosecute itt such tuir Merely because their . purses were !Ong enoug,h to harrass tors, that could riew6te allowed, considering fiOW encroachments of that kind were tolerated witho ut ca lli ng upon the parties to show their legal rights. This injunction .ought to go on con dition that the Attorney-General would undertake to •submit a case to the decision of the common law trlit'anals, with a view to determining the legal right by the verdieref a' urwind. that, toq,.t9.* (*.p.a.% owly Las poseiqle. 41 it were—to:Oohs on at tie dent Chester assizes, the parties woult: onv v the.betiefit of the argument •antillecision upon the Newcastle case in the next term, to facilitate their cudeavours. A case might easily be framed, admitting the erections, with power to exclude the contrary evidence, leaving..d.te nuisance as the only question for the jury. • ' The. , S( - ) T. ICI T on-GEsi r7l .' A t. said that Aerie * &old consult upon the most proper case for the jury. . • . • SuanwEL t. said, that there was a company projected . for erecting, way which was to cover nearly one whole bank of the Thames, LOAD CHANCELLOR said, whether the picot was ad .quad damuum or ad (pod Lmnia, he did not knpiv. It could not be entered upon without an Act of Parliament, which made the MSC quite different: ~~ *NO* ,Pwro ti VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Prc.ls. ill BE .111CIIABPSON, A BANKRUPT. This was a case which had been frequently before the Court, and the present petition rehted solely to the question of costs, on which subject the Counsel were to-day heard at some The Vicr-Cat A mcEr.r.o tt, in giving judgment, said that 'the case had cone before the Court on the petition of Mr. jtawlin son, an assignee under a commission of bankruptcy that had issued against James Itiehardaon. But the commission having. been subSequently superseded,: on the ground . that it. had ' leer ' fraudulently concocted between the bankrOpt nd . Alt% Buckley, the solicitor under the commission, the. bankrupt anti his s o le. char haying on that occasion offered no defence, the Court wa g hound to look at the case made in fivotir of the supersedeatt ; 4: proved, and consequently decreed the cost's against certifn par ties, one of whom was the solicitor,,.Alr. littekley.. Air. Raw. linson, after having in his petition:set out these litrEs, e g t oie ue4 ,, to say, that the Solicitor had, notaitfoitatiling; - coretneneed an action against him, as assignee!, for the 4 c this under the missien, an th at the Messenger, to the Commas"; ion had al sti brought .another action for his cost's. The petitioNr.alleged, that as the Solicitor was a party to the fititiel unotfivhlelithe Court ordered the ComMissind to be aupertetleal; lie Was DO lit'A dition tai gron n d any det nand, in a m atter that bad procaxletk from his own Wrong.: and therefiire that' he(Rawlinson,) Op wtiqqt ; the office of assignee had been'threeit, ,in• total ignbratiee eny collusion, might - to be discharged front all liability. • The isaute' argument Moils liebtwith regard to the demand made by son, the m essenger ,' When the last petition was debated, the Court, Inasmuch as by formally ordering. Hackle): to pay the cost, h'ael decided that he was a party to the fraud, it would not now permit'him , tor a is G , a claim arising. out of that fraud; and_ at once ordered tilt!. proceedings to he staid. He then had no doubt as to the legal Aorisdiction of the Coon on that point.— Gibson, however, .‘ tclioncartitt4 2 4 , : 1 4`ti tom iniu and Mr. Rettlinspft,br,.. 4l !;e- !Attor,..ifie4on" woeld be brought to fre•ftieilefenoei t i n da he just Wit , goad in law as iii eriti4;talld'ttt 'vivo rOCa''ei gar ni o ntion of witheNses heing a better Mode' of . trothAmn the a ffidaviiK of partie s , the Court Would leave the 'ittletßon to be tried, and reserve. the matter of costs till. after its termination. Buckley still persisting ttrhis iirtinn, he must take it a, p ro ved to the satisfac tion of the.Jtalge,a r od.l.ur, that GibSOllWlO a party to•the Now tame the'question o . f costs, whi c h. ,h e h a d reserved on firmer ticbtiShinl no t in aceount'of 'any doubt • that he had with regartltd the jurisdiction of the Court,' but hecanse he did not wish to give any decision until the 'outer had received its fullest runt most impartial consideration. It was now quite clear that the tlourt bad bitt one why'Of proceeding with regard •to Buckley, although, riineothe trial; and the last hearing of the petition, it appeared that ailielavits had been filed, under, the hope of inducing the Court' !.o alter the ; decision it had felt It its duty tricometo. - flowever . anxious the Court might be that every case should he thoroughly investigated, yet it was also necessary foe the general ends of justice, that it should he bound by certain rules.. It was for this reason that he could • not now look at the affidavit*, more especially as no applica tion had' been made to explain any part of the case, ant the Court would not now permit it to be altered, when the only 'gnes'ion remaining for decision was that of costs. . lie was of opinion that Buckley, the solicitor, must pay :the costs. Ilc also assumed that' Gibson might . have been at party to the fraud ; anti many doubts had been expressed as to the juris diction of the Court with rcgard to this Mw,enge.r ; but he thought that the (heat Seal had plater to deal with all parties .who were the instruments'Of the Court in cases of bankruptcy, •nt.l lie therefore did not consider that any rational &milt eauld be maimained as to that point. lle, however.. slieuld, not tie. cree the costs against him, as the action had been commenced by him when Rawlinion filed his petition. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, DEc. 15. GA MRI.ING-11plItiES. [Further P3ltihlißll4.l TIFF XING V. This was an indictment against the defendant, for keeping the establishment which has been recently the subject: of much public obse r v Odom A full *pee:llA jury aneseered to their multi:is, and were sworn. The A TT 0 UK EY.-OEN nit:t 1, rose,. on the , part of the de fendant, and. lookingyound, inquired if Isitypf his learned friends Were instructed for the prosy cution. flticeiving nu. ulk. iswa, 116 skid. 1 believe no one appears to prosecute, and there fore the•defemlant is entitled . td an rtequittal. • The Loop (in .lust'tci. dip addressed the Jury.— "' tientlemen, this is an indictment charging the iletenthmt wick a misdemeanour.. Tel one appears to , prove that lie is guilty, and therefore all you .can do is to K m* hi m ' , The Jur., accordingly .returiivd a ; verdict of Not (ii‘qty. Oil M F. v. (.119CK I , RI)„ • Th i ‘ 4 Actioit against the tlefendant in the last prosecu tion founded rm the statute of It Ann, c.. 14112, which gives to the loser of uny s,em exceeiling Itt, at ono sitting, a power of ro meering it hack within three tlis ; and whieh.enables any person atter the expinition.,of 'that time, trithOut action on the part of the loser, to suc.tbr the *urn Wit, and treble . . its amount, from the winner, 0ne, 4 11 .1 11%,.5. 1 his .0 wn , usa, and the,ettotr to that : of the poor of' the pa s where the (genes; shall he coin inittcd. The plaintitr in thivcase sued on the latter Clause, for cour.times the value of the eliontlY Itlst bYleeeiral personi to the defendant, on,k)elkalftif the itifiltn , g Apc.t!lielmor of thepariali 'lif G cOrge i , - 1 - frindVe r.squ:ire. Tell Vecial'i urn* were:sworn: " " - • • . , No tifler being tintyed for the plaintiff, the .4 1 TTO nwr writ .0. rove, anti prayed it lairs for the de fen,o a lintuo junws were sectirtlingly sworn. The Arv'olttietv,.ltr t:>rstetrl tit an amt a short pat ,R „ mti m which exci tOsonic,stirilisu.„ill it,was- known that Ur. and 111 r. .. ilistteson were ufstructea for the Th e • LORI) Clll StysTryi.: —Tit) appears foi the phon.. The ATTORNEI*-(;.E.Nr4tAL--It doesnot nt i i t;s l ; e t instructed. . 1;t1 1 1 Tr e . rr l'uteson wen; that Itll y4 O P . r . t 1 herd if:111:31: Pli 11 i The Lonn,Citir.V si-ns . ric . E directed that thosegentielnesi slionld he sent for, as they bad Vecii itistrucio tel p • ' The A .oTottNrY•th"• 447oi. H Pc44l lis,' my Lord; che.T. haVe been instructed it disalear.—(A la ug h . ) . 'I..- • • 111 r. Pll 1 i.1.11.$ Mri 1 1411Ekto,N now came inter Cantle and Were infurima "that tt tier's hall beet) pr a t,,d, an d the Jury sworn. 111 r. Pit mr.ips.-111y Lora, t.WaS quite unconscious' that the' cause was ailed on. Ali Learned Friend and myticl,l'Ye r e .cobsulting with our client in the Bail -court on the propriesY withdrawing the ceord in consequence of the absence of Pin' cipal witness i and I had recommended that this cause should ' be taken. I hope the Attorney-General will allow.us to with draw it now ; if not we shall be driven to indict him. The ATionNEY-GENEitax.,:—l hope I mu not liable to be personally indicted--(A: laugh.): ' Mr. l'inwvs—Olt •no ! I mean your,client.. I hope we may still withdraw the record. : The AT To RNEY-GENERAIJ—T hope von may be nonsuited. Mr. Put r.Lies—lf your, Lordship wishes en affidavit of the facts, it can be made directly. The Loan CittEr J usTicE,LI have' no ituthority allow the record to be withdrawn without consent, after the Jury are sworn. If you should be nonsuited, oil think you hove grounds for !getting the nonsuit aside, you must move the Court. I do .not mean to • intimate that you have any such grounds, or that the Court will assist you ; I only say 1 cannot assist you here. Mr. Pit ti.t.trs and Mr. PATT!,solgr called their client and spoke • , After which Mr. PATI*SOS said, Lord,.we are very unfortunate; our abience,frOm the Court was quite accidental; and haul been hero; We 'certainly shOiild not blive n11(40 the Jury to be sworn,” , •• • - The Loan crITEr JTIOTIcE—T an sorry for it, Sir; but I. cannot assist you, unless the Attorney-General will consent., All I could do would be to discharge the Jury ; and I have never done so in such a case ; nor do I think there are grounds to justify me in adopting such a course in thix. A .juror may be withdrawn, and the record afterwards withdrawn by consent. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL—My Lord, I do not consider myself' authorized to consent to any thing. in this case. It ion penal action. - The LORD CIIIEF Jos-mg—l cannot desire you to do so; I have no power to interfere,'exdept by discharging the Jury, and I do not think I ought to do that under any circumstances presented to my notice. • Mr. RAl:Ts:sox then.proceeded to open the pleadings. The declaration stated, that one Lane Fox, Esq. in February, 1104, lost 6,000/..t0 the defendant ; that he did not sue for the sam e within three months; - and that thereupon an action accrued to the plaiutiff to recover. for himself and the poor of the parish of St. George, Hanover-square, the said sum and three times its amount; in the whole '.10,000/. There were other statements of losses by other persons of the same nature ; and four counts on eacletransaction., The entire sum sought to he recovered was about 1110,000/. Mr. PHIL Ors saidit 'would he am unpardonable waste of the time of the Court if he should mate a case which he did not. know „that he should be able to prove. A number of. wit nesses hail Veen' subpeenaed on behalf of the plaintiff; and it was a ditty they owed to the Court, as well as to the party, to appear in aid of public justiee. If they should not appear, Mr. 1 hole would hive his remedy against them ; if any of them slieultl appear, they would prove the case more fully than lie could State it. 41r. PATTESON then called the Right lion. Horatio Earl of ierford, and the officer began to call hint aloud. The lions) CHIEF JUSTICE—Before names are called out in this way, you should band in your subpainas. Mr. I'ATTI:m.)I4,4)Iy Lord, we cannot tell that the witnesses will, not appear. ;11r;.Orme,.the plaintiff, an elderly man of respectable ap pearanere, then handed in. a Rubp t ena. The Noble Earl was, then called three times,And did not ap 3Protr;re Auj•re"reElclilvlalin•di Hughes Bstatiillixtinuagsi,esbutucillidilinri;t Edwa r d aivL.r `lllr...Thomas.Cliappell wits called, anA l imfdttr," that' he' was locally prise, of the Court ; the ftwiveirttltititiiet,tri his client, said m eo ‘ ul i d y wpeak to ma. terial have sai V tta,ly called the parish not think :vet V4114 , l men suopirnas s t ;l tat uo t: ar t .t e , p l e t t li 4r : w l rt :s ' t i a. ;' ,: s :a i t ; ti e l i f i nr t le e e:r f. tp ow l c r et o ei ll i l l s i i t: s t e li l s g t o i s pw a n " ; ll l . : ie ' Wli t th wi n . wohto " Mr. Pult.ws.,--No, in,, Lordd 'flit' Loan CIIIEE usTlCE.—Theal Call the plaintiff. The plaintiff was accordingly ntinsuited: you!' Lordship certify Special Jury ; the suns 11 : 1 0 e i t ;;; tb e he i llell i:We ls I s n o te: , ' - le ::; 4 l cy l t ; a :s is is l irs : l • 4 -ite t .. E l t l o t W r o s br t . t e r i g t s tA i c i r t li r .e. t d . - 0 - I :c e y :no t ial if t y i . ng merely t o the re- The ATTOIt X t: ENE RAL.—Net after your Lordship has heard the names of the expected Witnesses ? The Loup Cut .IuSTICE.-1 think not, Mr. Attorney. Here the matter dropped. Lord Sefton and Air. (Ireville ast on the Bench, and the Marquis of Hertford, at a subseqUent period, entered the Court, and • after speaking, to the Lord Chief Justice, sat some time on the Bench; but no allusion was made to them in the course of the day. . . CHIN CON. , GRAHAM. V. WRIGLEY. Mr. SCAIILETTTsaid the plaintiff hail married in 1016 the lady who was the cause of the present action, and he being at that time in possession of a small pension, not more than 1101. per annum, which was not sufficient to procure for' himself and his wife more than the necessfirin of life, went to India for the purpose of getting employment as a portrait painter. Having been unsuccessful in his professional pursuitsm India, the plain tiff and his wife ' who had accompanied him to India, returned ti, England in September 1020. In December Itl2o, the plain. tifr having occasion to visit friends in Scotland, front whom he had considerable expectations, proposed to divide lAN pension with her during his absence.• Tins arrangement having been entered into, the plaintiffwent to Scotland, And his friend Mr. Laing regularly paid to Mrs. Graham 15s. per week until lag June, when lie learned that Mrs. (inthani was living with the defendant as his wife. Having proved those filets he should be entitled to their verdict. lie did not mean to Kay that this was a case which called for heavy damages, because he could not ' l l i fi r :II f inoyevidence to chew that the defendant had any know ledge of the existence of . the plaintiff , or that there was any hospitality on the part of the defendant. lie would admit that in ihe case of the plaintiff end his wife, the proverb, evert)! coes in at the door love flies mit of the dow" was verified, m and that they did not agree as well as, be fore they went to India; but notwithstanding this, the defen dant was not justified in having had criminal intercourse with the plaintiff's wife. The doctrine that a person separated from his wife could not maintain an action of this kind, which as for a long time sanctioned by this Court , was now ex. ta oiled ; and therefore if the act . of , adultery should he proved, he datylof the Jury would he to award to the plaintiff such damages as would in their opinion compensate him for the in. inry which he had sustained. David Laing--I know theplaintiff and his wife. I was pre: sent At their marriage at St. Martin's Church The plaintiff was a portrait-painter.- M rs. Graham's maiden name was Caro. line Keaisslini,. She was a tbreigner, but I (1(10 know of what ia n g n e_ ati t v i e le . y They lived at niy house for some time a t e t: lt r iel : r i l e t i tr) it l i lle l l i ttr O rs . After the w ir en r t e t t ) u u r t n tQ th j e n y di l a nd i g h ed lB i i n n' V ' f Tlliusra d 're : street in the Strand until Dee. 1020. Alr. Graham then wenetirScodand, and Airs. G. remained in London. Mr. O. desired me to pay Alm 0, 15,1. per week, and I paid her that sum regularly up to June last. At that time she was living at No. 5, Albany-road, Walworth. I first knew the defendant in the latter en d of 1 022, when , Mr. G. told me that he was her Mugger. . I called her Mrs. Graham in his presence, Not hav ing remarked the number of the house when I first called, .1 Vie n eighbourhood on nit second visit for Mrs. G., intquirebionseribed'lW a foreigner, and I was then informed that s ''',. l° . ln . ~ Loy, named Wrigley, lived at No.'ll, Albany-mad. a "'Rik' WIPP! , v e nt to No. 5, I found ,that Airs . °minim and Mrs. wftle it4Ore o. A' • one and the same prawn. ,e, to .examined by - Mr. MESSMER—I did .not knnW where A i rs „o ; lived before her marriage. ,1 first knew Mrs. G., in ~,,n. . iequence Orher coming to my }house to sit for her portrait. .Wherrlllr, andtlifrs. G. Separated in IMO, he told me that he bail received at letter tVom India, tuntaining very unpleasant re- T orts.relidive to his wifto!s coquet in Intlift. He desired mu to go fehis clothes and he then told me that, lie did not intend to live with her any longer Idikontirmed her weekly allowance in June last.. ~Ldou'r know that Mrs. U. Orti saw Mr. G. since lie left London for Scotland. James hedger—l lodged at No. 5, Albany-road, Somerset- Place, \%'alworth, in April, 18'23. ' The landlord and his wife iw;ed hy,the runup of Al r. and Mrs. Graham. The defendant wes'the landlord. Ihere were•but two bed-rooms in the house. I occupied one, and the defendant and Airs. G. occupied the other room t thqaPPeliced to me to bo man and wire. I have seen Mr. Laing at the h0w.... Mrs. U. told me that the de fentlant'Wati her second husband. Crowesamined-1 understand that Mr. Wrigley had a pen, lion from Government. By the Cou we—The defendant the did not keep a servant. defendant's house in the Henry Lyons--I lodged at Albany-road. ' He passed by the name of Graham: "On ono qeession when I was out late at night the defendant let me in, and then retired to the room in winch Mrs. -Graham slept. The defendant told rue that he had been in the Navy for 20 years. crass.examinad—Th e defendant never told me that he war a .purser, and had 3s. a day half-pay. He thought he was a Captain, • • Mr. itiCAßLETi—To . shve' trouble, I admit that the defend. ant is n, purser on half pay. Thennatt Saunders swore that- he lived at the defendant's house; and that he and Apra. Graham passed as man and wife. Mr. Tuussrot itistannitted that the plaintiticould mat main• min this action (which was founded upon the toes of hie wife's society), because he had abandoned his wife for 4 years, and had declared tit the tithe df separation that he had determined never agaiu to,liVe with ' , • y - Ilis . LOUDsinp was ofminion*, that the, separation between the plaftitiff and Iti4 wife was. 'licit so complete aaeparation us would barthis action. .Mr.,Tlx!ssiOElt thert addressed this Jury *lite defendant-. Tbe-iandour with which the Learned Coonsel - for the, pisiniir had tidniitted that this was not a case which Called fin heavy datnages,'renderedkit unnecessary for him to Make Many ob. servations, .werp it not for the opinion which had been pronoun., ced his Lordship; he should. have thought that, the verdict ought to pass for the defendant. The province of the Jury was not to punish the defendant for any breach of morality, but tO award to the pla!ntiff a compensation for the loss of society of his wife., Ile should leave this case in the hands of the Jury, upon whom he called to bear in mind that the defendant was a hall.pay purser upon a very small pittance.; dint there was no eVidence,to shew that he knew that the lady with whom he co habited'wei the wife of the plaintiff; and that the plaintiff had in Weembet 11120 expressed his determination never more to live with his wife, anti had then.promised to her a miserably . weekly pittance, which was discontinued in June last. • Ilia 'ldonnsitti. summed up,, and the Jury immediately found a verdict fortlie plaintiff—Damages One Shilling. LI npr,. of at : T lnh jct si s: tee a ns t i Tcb : t e c tnet t t e f t Iroh these, b. defendant eel Harrisl l it ) 11 Mr. ! !Jerk, i.1:641 would flank, issue: a , it : 1 a:yr t attorney, ipasseda MARIUS versus JAN'. n nd ch d r. e at Hereford, against Mr:Jay, one of the partnet; in the ba Alr. SCA ittETT stated the case ot' the plaintiff: There had ben silence. thatn e. he u ho t an r i d t r eifrmuotimmotimel one o f malice taken that heenn iil h ) c o :I:d o :7 1e ! produced much ani mo sity ; and if the letter charged as libel. blackest causes. These imputations were convey i t t i i n ier a s dishonestly, ite the receiver of the rents of a gentleman named from Mr. le t te r under them Mr. Harris &had not be silent. 'They were wholly groundless; for the , rents had always been paid ; and the action which had been so stigmatised had tcucceeded. 'The letter, dated January ar. ink; to put (town the s set, to whom it was e:t geti fu l f ro w i r ll 2 ie e e ' l i e rn i :l n s a s P i:t w ( d " o i :n l h l . a b nt t p li b e l e t r g:a o t t i t : by static(; art affair relative to So me no i t l e c ii rs o o f tu t i l rr le o h:l m ik i:o s i e n nt oi :y , were taken, on which one of the partners wrote, " We want no furling proof that Mr. Harris is a great blackguard." It to then intimated that future to Mr. Weston had forbithieet-lim,ft. It thensr teidrr wivillghttrayLtc to hold it candle to the devil . " — d that Mr. Harris had, out of malice, picked up 'one of the blackest causes ever beard of, by . one Crouse against rslr. ,Tuherville, which that gentletnan intended to defend ; and concluded with a hope, " that God Almighty would soon rid the earth of such a diabolical wretch." On the cross-examination of 31r. (Jarrett, that witness stated that he ceased to he a member of the firm in April, 1t122, and Wa,beea at variance with his late partnere. They bad` . ,at Yam ••• Stl to ruvikr..l4lll., UUI WU teas know whether he was in arrear nt the time the letter was Written. At that time he had as bad an opinion of Mr. Harris as he could entertain; and he never produced the letter till after he left the firm. It was produced before the Comndssioners on the bankruptcy of a person named Waukee, in July, 1823, not on account of its contents, but on account of a memorandum endorsed on it, totally foreign to the present cause. Mr. Harris was present; the letter was taken away by some one ; but th e for rtnpeesrsj perjury 1 andn Harr is tsad imtet carried ca l 1 i a , r n r iS in b t a w d ee i n nd l ic i t e ed m irr re specting large•transactions in which they had been engaged ; the letter was demanded of Mr. Harris, but he never returned it. It was proved that Mr. Harris was receiver of Mr. Weiton's rents, anti that in the action against Turberville referred to in the letter, that gentleman gave a co/merit, and judgment was finally entered up for 3811. damages, and costs. The AvronarEv-OENEttar. addressed the Jury for the defendant. If Air. Harris really sought by this action' to vin dicate his character, surely he would have brought it to trial in the city where he was known, where the defendant also was known, and where the injury„ if arty, must operate. if suet had been his object, he worthd have contented himself with a single action ; yet the very next cause in the list was an action by-Air. Harris against Mr. Hadenham, Alr. Jay's partner, be cause he happened to direct the letter which he culled a libel. W as it not clear that the vindication of character was not his objeci ; but that he, being an attorney, only made use of this letter to put costs into his pocket, which he knew must follow the farthing he would obtain? Could he ask for mare ? • The letter was written from one partner to another on the business of the firm—for Turberville was their debtor, and Weston their customer—in all the cenfidence which such a relation de manded. Fifteen months after, it was produced for a collateral purpose ; seen and caught at by Air. Harris as a ground of action ; and now by him, and him only, published -to the World. Could there be any doubt that he purloined this letter, though Mr. Garrett did not see him take it ? And would the Jury now give him more than a farthing for the injury done to his character, by a letter written to a person who thought as ill of him before as he could—a letter accidentally produced, which he himself had taken, and now had the audacity to make the ground of an action for damages ? , - Mr. it:AItLETT submitted, that an the Attorney.Oeneral had stated a fact which was not in evidence, relative to the next cause in the paper, he had a right to reply. The LORD CHIEF J.tlirrlCE thought the allusion scarcely justified a reply, its it was very usual for Counsel tOrefer . to aootherr .cause depending between the same parties. M r. SCAR LET T said he would wave his right at presenti btit if .the Attorney-Gentle' stated a fact again, he should certainly re. ply upon his speech. ' The A rTnht NI EYMENERM, said, he was quite ready to oh. serve this strictness. if. his friend would do the same;' bur he as regularal his friend. re' l d ‘ l i y ie ti r d i, l i g t i n kt C li t c o w :rJt ri s ike T:e f re l i t :pressed his opinion, that the letter, though written from one partner to another, was not a privileged 'communication ; and that therefore the action would lie. The Jury Wonld recollect that it painted between partners both at variance with Mr. Harris; that the person to whom it wits addressed entertained as bad an opinion of Mr. Harris be. fore as after it; that it was not intended fur publication,. i v n 4 that it had , been taken, by Mr. Harris or some one who placed it in his hands. The law said the action would lie they would say what damages the plaintiff ought to recover. The Jury consulted for some minutes, and then returned verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 201., HARRIS L. BODENIIAM• In this action, connected with the lust, and referred to by the AttorneyAlener;il, a juror was withdrawn by consent. , • • Mr. SCAR t.ETT begged to state, as it had been imputed to Mr.'. Harris that he stole the letter, that the person who took it was now in Court. 'f he it vronwEr.(ll:l4Eltal., AS we understood said b e did n ot now to impute •thcft in an offensive sense to Alf. Barris.' The LORD C.RIEF JUSTICE stopped the discussion as trre. gular, and the Matter dropped. [For the remainder of the LAW Pkocerimtos of yesterday, See the retqth I'4tte.l On Friday, as a poor Rid • man, upwards o f 8( mil t old, who travels about the country as a chair -mender, or broomilasher, was walking alone in the dark towards Dover. near the edge of the cliff' at the back of the Castle, by Kole means he fellfrtim the top of the cliff down upon the be4eliv_a . perpendicular height of 60 or 60 feet ; ,he was, picked up and.. conveyed to a !edging by some of the coast blockade, and although it would seem scarcely credible that he should cape being dashed to pieces, none of his bones were broken, and he is still alive, though suffering much from his bruises.—( Kea. flab Gazdtc.)