The Sun. — London, England, 1820-09-07 00:00:00

li•Tv ti*Al.n6t mikb.me•to zniuttit—alyielf,vor any or the 'patties I terrtuntht r ! . t or; , soore. Did 41a: iett i give you any advice, at tirneort r to the evi ittr.re ycor.wi;it , so gire ill this came ?—Never. • va Mare t i offer you any woney pecting your evidence ? • Did the Attarney-Oeneral to the•Qiieett ?--Never. Mr. BROUGH/01.-1I am infinitely indebted to your Lord ships tortllewing.nch questiotN to he out. I could not,put them myself, however nrich. I might wish to do so. Sari Gahl(;...2.When aid you take the name of Milani, at Faris ? - --Fotir or fire days before I 4ct•ont for England. Wien was that?—ln the.mott - th of .Ittiy, last year. Tell us why yclo to.de that name, at that time, in Paris? — As I Isnewl was Loosen in" London by my own name, I endea voured to en,utt- rtti..stafctv by cover:aim; it. Had arty tutooii hal:ye:tett atttatt. that, time ? WWI tii!ti the It itnefSel, I:1 thii cisitse . r tts a gicat risk if their names were known. . • . Had you heen Joh! t hey,had.a: t ttally ran fur ri.k ? —Nn. YOt have stated, in . 3 toyiner ansror, e, that yon dianzed your liante to Milani,ln eon‘ecinenee of a toundt which had hap pened, a•nd that ypti ‘houle. he in danger ; what did you:mean by that statement? A !)EER.—'flie witness diki not mai , .e use of those - exact words. The Nlint►tes we; e refe•rrca to, and it was found, that in sahstance t he.f miler answer was the sane, although there w.. 14 a verloal Gill tc e. Whitt."l wal at Par . ... a Sentienyttt came to me with Krtittg. the' tvutier, Arid t•,1(1 me it woald lie necelotary I should change ws tiamt ; that .1 should h in danger iti,Lomloti, if w,tlt by my eu-ti rilmel I bad 'old film that my own name witc nnttn in Lm , l9n. • flirt he nut tell ymt.iotur ttimult hail. hnpenrd with 'respect t', illy vo,tl;eit's ?..--Ve•.• • On what riecAii o n ,4jd h e t e ll yrvi. a ttinaillt had take-n place? - -•- Ile told- 'Me about the witnesses, and others. i'ua hate ment . i.4io'd others. Vi'hat do you mean by other rrsons?--I o.4•iwt to say, that some disorders had happenesi to others on the !Arne account, or from similar causes. What ($0 you mean by the same account, or sititilat causes? I hare i.epeated what the Gentleman. t old me. t'hd you understand the toning had happened about the witnesses who- came to give evidence about the Queen ?---1 belies-tot it was.. )i.r know any witnesses had come ester to give evi t!imet, about the' Queen ?-1 was not at that time certain of it ; I imagined it.. VVag it in conseruenie,uf lxiter sent fur that you came.?— Yes. Where slid you lodge wl4ets yore 6rst came to England ?4 , .. In Leicester-square, at tiablontere's. „ . - time long.did you-remain there ?—About a fortnight. Where did - ynti.fiee after Nrundel;street. Eln coneepteoce of the disturbance below the.bar, we did net distinctly hear the last answer; %se presume however that the name of the street is not very important, and art kilning* certain it is that above-mentioned.] How 1 ,1 11:: did you retain the name of Milani?--Until the aThir of Dover happened. 'Then you had me Cloinged it before ?--Not before. Lord DAR LINGTON—,Why - were you discharged front the service of her. goyal Highness ?—ln conseqtrenee of a differ it:nee I' had with the confectioner. Whii•disell'arged yon ?=Count Schavini came. to me, anit told me _lie had orders to dismiss me. You have said, that since you have lived in England, you resided with Mr. Godfrey.' In what capacity did you reside .with him seas ill in tondon, and was advised fns the pur p,se of establishing my health, to live with Mr. gudfrey. Yon have spoken ,eta ball or halls given at Barons. were these halls girt n before her Royal Highness went to Turin ? 'Saute were given before. - - • . . Do you rtcoilect the Kin: and Queen of Sardinia bei,ng al , the Hotel of the'University?—..tio. Martinis of HUNTLY.—‘‘ hen you were discharged by .Cuunt Schavini, did hr give you the certificate signed by her Itu 'a l Hig.hite , s ? .• Mr. 4 BROUGHAM.—This question asgumes it to have been admitted in evidence, that such a certificate, signed by her :Royal Highness, was gisiv,n. Lord LIVERPOOL—NI yLords, it must he understood by the rounseli that although they can go no further in their exa 'irtinations or cross-examinations than their respective situa • 'tions will admit, that the Lords may put questions which the Counsel cannot, inasmuch as tlo.y combine in , their persons all the sii,tations as Jodges or Ctitinel. The LORD CIANCELLOP,-The question cannot be put .ur:til the s'gnaturo is proved. . . . , Lord GROSVENOII—Did you, receive A certificate at. the 'time you were discharged ?—No ; on the following day he gave it to me. • • What rank did you first -hold when you were in the Army t f Italy ?—,:‘ cornmon . soldier. , Were von -raised to the rank of :Lieutenant fur your good conduct ?-:—Yes. - I,Vere. :. yzt ;acquainted , with any Officers ,who subsequently obtained counnioions in the Swiss army?--I tin not remember. Lord - FALmouTtr:—With respect tothe balls at the Itarona,• wl,ieh the witness has spoken of, I wish to know how tong her. - )t. , •yal Highness , generally remained at them when the was. :present ?..—lte came to sometimes with her own company, and . sometimes out of her own room, and usttal)y stopped three ur four minutes. The tsiitiess has stated the manner in which some women at these balls were taken out according to the will and plea ,sure of the men, dies he remember any women so taken out • 'under the observation •of her Royal Highness, on any one of those occasiorts when she was present ?-11e has never made • the ohserv'ation. . j• Did the witi‘ess • consider himself entitled to milt with the cosopalq.bo These occasions?—Ali had the same,liberty. Thente did'cimsider himself entitled to mix with the corn ?-4 d.id.• Was the Witness, or any of the other servants, allowed to" ,- irivite their friends to these balls far as I am concerned no: as. far - as the others were concerned I do not believe. Thenl anitonnderstand that the Princess, or some person 'directed : l,l he'', invited the company ?—Cettainly. ‘Vith regard to your leaviog her Royal,Higliness's sqpice I -wish to ask whether at that time you had, any recent tittarrel 'with Bergami?..--1 do not recollect. Lord LauncanaLe.—Do you understand the French lan rage ?-:L-Yes. • Was that speech which ber.,Royal • Iligknes.s made to coil the Court with Bergami delivered in French or Italian?— 'Her Royal Highness always spoke to me in Fre.och. .Can ton state, in French, the precise terms she made use _9H-11er. Itoyg Highness said to me:---a` Je %WV( faire nn 46 - eadeank quelipies-iines ile ces demoiselle gni vienent 1 is dance—comment peat-on les liabiiter ces vierges? Crater. " 'volts, Mr. S;lcelti, qu'elles soot 'telles? •Je teratid,yis !‘ quant43. anti je crois•bien que ce,sont des hon Otes fines, ie n'ai deo e dire k leur Charge.' Elle reprit,—je• sass one 4 4 eons avez .conche avec deux oil trois d' elles, et ausst je combien de fois yams avec ett commerce avec elles. Sun " Allesse Royale aura par!6 beaucoup mieux que•moi, mail el-oind.reffet.” • I wish to ktiOw if, after having made•this Speech in the Court, the Princess was ever, seen at these balls, when these • Wronen were t here ?—I do not kn ,, w. Did y see a ny Of those virgins at the ball after tha t pet 719 a do.not lihow situ p tr,ticul:tr tit; sus. Was "Ole stone sort of comptoy present afterwards ? Pretty. crotch the.. carte. What sort of•Cirriage was that io which the curtains were ..—vas - it one in .which persons must sit, or might. they lie There were three or four carriages, and her Itoyil Highness _went sometimes, in true and sometimes in anothe'r ; brit I do loot knoW whether theymight sit or lie in there. I wits to know in Which of ,those carriages it VMS thatlirr w is travelling when that occurred' which he - bat related do not ter:Acct. . • Were there more carriages - which opened with curtains tluin one ?—There acre two, I believe. Iri either of these, was it possible for a person to lie full length, or was it not possible to lie;st. all believe it w io i t he. Were they sitting or lying at the time when that scene took place•v,•hich you have described? -They appeared to me to be Was :any one elselmt Bergami and the Princess in the car riage iot he loom m morning ?—I said Ldid.not remember, it is niit . .present I) my Can you tell if the Contest of Oldi teas in the carriage? Ga i t ) I did not remember whithei she was present " nut• • if s h e _wits present, is it not certain that the Princess and. r erg an t i,Ae . eve sittirg neat each Othur ?—I saw them sitting . beside each othyr.—(Lood cries of withdraw.) Earl GREY observed that. their Lordships only prOlonZed, instetlth•of abridging the proceedings, 14 these clamorous 'hi , tee rulpt‘ons. Lord lIALCARRAS.—Was the Princess on the right or left .or Berg:tali when . you opened the curtains?—On the right band.. , Was . the opening on the right or left of your own person ? On the right. When you opened the cnrtains did you ask for orders?- - Is;,,,hectl4e ky were atbeep. yon awake thew Py Lord CALTHORPE.—D.id you • ask to see the Princess after Schavini had discharged you ?-4. asked to see the Prin- . I<'i cen aitcrl recelrecl the certiacate-the ereniiig bevru I Nrctil Did' you, see tier after you received that Certificate'.'--I do not rememhei.- Did you Ste her after you untler‘toOd you were to quit her service ?--I (lid. What paaaed: on that ocrasionq--....1 ler Royal 1-iighliecs told me that she gave me my disetiarge.iti “reit'r to give au example to the other servants that ther'e should not Ge quarrels in the house. . s. Did her Royal Highness state.what the canse of the quarrel . was?--She tuld me, tire:arise I had this quarrel with the' confectioner, she did not like that such quarrels should hap- . penin the house. Did, she state any other . reasort . fZir . discharging you ?—She did not. Did von. make any,_grirly..)—l said I did not think that a • tault sufficient for my. discharge. Did s h e 91,1 i, aUy ;il;oki , ;ti. to your former conduct?--Her Royal Highness always siroWert her satisfaction °limy couduct. , Did she promise you any . certificate of your good conduct ? No. I did not speak about the certificate. The AT wished to be allowed to pnt, thropgh the Court. the -tollownirg question:--Is that paper, (sliming the certitioltiy) itt thelond-uritiog of Scharini ? As-far as I know, it is. !Lee yon tern him writr ?—Several times. Do yon ben. ve that be his hand-writing,--4 think it is, for certain: I nut sure. of it. • Mr. BROtAiIIANI was ahout to address the Hottse, hut was prevented tiv re prated cries of " withdraw." The 14)RD CIIANCELLOR.7--Order in the House - Mr. BROL - GHAM liespolse their Lordships' patience. Whilst he asked permission to put a question to the witness, through the Court. Did not the witness, in answer to thequestion put by the Interpreter,, as to whether he had replied Cox or elle., among u tirr• e words say, inais 'c'etait relifet ? The LORD -CHANCELLOR directed. the short-hand writer to read his notes to that question and .answer. It had hero written in the minutes," Son A nesse Rcyale aura park miens que mai, mais Cfteit a vet diet." - Mr. 1111.01 . 6L1AN1.,--Let ,hint be asked,, whether be means to say that he used the first, but not the last of these %voids, viz. c'stait atet effet.?--r-What he aleant to say Was mass ca est le fait—but this is the fact. The witness here withdrew. The LQUI) CHANCELLOR stated to the House.that in consequence of x comintinication which had been made to hint, it became his duty to state to their Lordships, that there 'was one of the witnesses for her Majesty then abroad in such a state of- health 'as rendered it'impoSsible for biro to proceed to this country. Under these circumstances, be suggested the expediency or sending abroad Something like a -Commission, . provided the consent of Cunusel vu both si.les were given. Thrs was a mode of proceeding continually practked with respect to witnesses in Ireland, and in India. Ile situuld not ask fOr an answer front Counsel that evening, hut he would take. the liberty of, trent ,ottiog it to morrow morning,. In 'the Ilie4ll time he had teat it to be his duty to make the pioposition. Robert Ilure crumbled by the SOLICITOIt- GENERAL. • Q: What is your occupation I am one of. the cashiers in • the house, of Messrs. Coutts and Co. Bankers. Ho long:have you held that sittiation ?—Upwards of thirteen years. Did her• Royal Highness the Princess of Wales ever keep cash with Messrs. CouttS and Co..?—Yes. • Have you been in the habit of paying her drafts ?—Yes, from time to time. Do you know her hand writing I—Yes, [The .certificate of Sacchi's character was here handed to the witness:l . ' Tell us wnether rot believe that signature to be the hand writing of the Queen ?—I believe it to he her hand-writing, when Princess of Wales. Mr. BROUGH A M.—Do you know the hand-writing of his Majesty the King I—Yes. SOLICITOR-GENERAL.—Have, you ever seen the King write I—Never. Flow do you know the hand -writing of the King 1-1 have. seen a Commission, which.l. was told he signed. Hare you any other knowledge than what you derived front the paper shown to you, and which you was told was a Com mission signed bv the King ?—No. • Mr. B1t01.:G11AM. —Did the King, when Prince Regeut, not keep money at your house I—Yes. Were rot cashier at that time I—Yes. Then did you pay his erafte ?-lle was not accustomed to draw birriself. Mr. BROUGI-lAM.—Ile cannot prove the King's hand writing. I admit. Mr. BROUGHAM 11 , M took op a heap of letters, and said to the Solicitor. Geovral—" Perhaps von kill adroit these let ters to he in the hand-writing of the king." )LICITOR-GENERAL.—I know nothing of them. I can admit nothing. - The certificate given to Saccbi on his quitting her Rays flighnesS's service was - then allowed to be read". It was, %lie translated, as follows "Pesaro, Nov. 5, 1817. " Her Royal Highness the Princess of ‘'alt.4 certifies to whrinsovec it may concern, that Mr. Givisceppi Sacchi, native , of Como, has hero in, the. service of her Royal Highness one year; up to the date hereof, fist as a Courier, and after wards Equerry; in all Which be was a most excellent person, and discharged his duty with assiduity, zeal, and fidelity. He was discharged as a mere ineastire of economy, that prefer ence b, ing given to the elder servants of her ROyal Highness, which their loPger services deserved. (Signed), • " CARCILINA PRINCIPESSA DE GALLES." The A ftNEY-I,Ar , ERAL rose to propose put ting in as evidence the certificate given to Ma jocci. Ile knew . that it, was not in the hand writing of her,Royal Highness, but it was writ ten by Schiavini, and it bore her Royal lligh ness's seal. It stood in evidence that Schiavini was the person who generally discharged set., vants, the he 'would submit that this proof of his authority gave him a character under which the certificate written by him was admis sible in evidence as an act of her Royal After hearing Mr. B,P.OUCITIAM and Mr. AT.. TO T INEy-O.ENERII., the LORD CIONCELLOII de clared his opinion that Sufficient evidence bad not been shown to authenticate document in question, and the Attorney-Peneral was then in formed by his Lordship, that he could not be permitted to offer it in evidence. , ArrortNEN-GLNERAL.—I have an application to make, of considerable importanee, and I wish shortly to state the object of my application. — Several, witnesses (three) Who reside at Lugano, _had set out.for England, and had arrived as far • • as 'Beagvais, when information reached them ,that certain: witnenes who had come to this country against the 6ieen„had been illtreated: :these. three. witnesses wereafraid,to come to England, and they went before,a MagiStrate, and deposed .that the rcason they did not .procee'd to England was, ,because they ys:ereafraid of their personal safety. The witnesses then returned to.Lugano. Upon information of this circumstance arriving in England, a person was dispatched to induce the witnesses to come over. to England, to appear at the Bar of the House of Lords to, give eVidence ; and it wasAhdught the, messenger might overtake the - witnesses,. but they had arrived at Lugano. A. letter had, however, -been received, stating that the witnesses had altered their minds,• and would proceed immediately to England; and I have every reason to believe that _they are at this moment. considerably advanced "On their journey to this country. Of the importance of their'evi deuce it : would not become hint to speak ; hut, if , the information he had received was correct, their testimony, ; he ,begged to assure their Lordships, was of the highest, importance to the case .under investigation. His object was to obtain an adjournment for a feW•dayS, when the witnesses, he had no 4oubt,. would be arrived in England to, give, evidence at their Lordship' Bar. _lie s ubmitted, therefore, - to their Lordships' consi- aeration, whether a. revitstlor a snort i'kgstßoty...- nNent of the proceedings was unreasonable on his 'part. If the witnesses set out on the 29th or last month (which he was informed . they "did),: they would be in England in a Week at most he, therefore, pressed an adjournment for that short period. Mr. Bitounn.vm said,that the request made by the' Attorney-General fiur delay, in the middle-of : a trial, was not only unprecedented and not ana: logous with the practice of the Courts below, but at variance with every principle of justice. The Counsel for the prosecution had aMple time to prepare their case, and when, he applied for a few days delay before the procebdingi com menced, on the ground of the ill state' of health of himself and Mr. Denman, not a Lord could he found to. ask for it. Yet, now, - Mr. Attorney- General, upon no legal or equitable t' arounds„ without affidavit of the facts to support.ltis state-. ment, but simply upon his viva vuV,i• narrative, would have a delay toenable him to patch up his. case with the evidence of these natives of Lu gano. The only • excuse he could assign was, that the agent appointed to . bring them over had allowed them to escape . fromhis keeping. Even assuming all the facts to be admitted, he yet re sisted the application. It was not, admissible ac cording. to the practice - of their LOrchltips' Bar. Before the case was opened, although I said„ " Do not begin until you are ready,". the Coun sel for theProseCution scouted the idea of delay; yet.now they Wonldoiolate the practice of every Court to obtain it only for a few clay.. He re peated it was to endeavour to patch up a case which,.ln any ordinary affair, would entitle the defendant to an. acquital, that this delay Was now sought. He trusted their Lordships would not - increase the difficulties which had been, heap ed upon him by yielding to such an application. lie did not say that this delay would be abused by the Learned Counsel; or even by the myste rious somebody who promoted •the prosecution but he protested against it as inconsistent, not only with the praetice.ot the-Courts below, but inconsistent with the ends., and principles of justice. Mr. DENmAN, before he, made any'observation, begged . to be infornied the day on which thee witnesses took fright, and turned round to go tome. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL.—The 27th of July last. Mr. BENALIN.—It appeared then that on the 27th of July these Luganians heard of something affecting their personal safety, and straightway . returned home. What was the cause of their re turning ? Suppose a witness coming over to Eng land on any trial in the Courts ,below were to hear of the Alien Bill, and was afraid to come, would any Court put off the trial? No .Court iti England, he was persuaded, would give way to any such miserable excuse. It would be scouted in every ordinary Court of Justice. After the examination of these witnesses, were their Lord ships to be called upon again to put off the trial upon some other plausible excuse ? When were they to hope to, be relieved from the pelting of dirt and filth upon her Majesty ? It would never cease if their application for delay were to be granted. They had had load enough upon them to bear without additional injustice ; and,he for one would never consent to his Illustrious Client remaining a, whole week longer the victim of ca lumny the most base. Ile protested against an adjournment to enable new witnesses to come, and enlist themselves; but hoped that tb4itne was now arrived, beyond the reach of all post pOnement, when her -Majesty would be granted perthission to answer all the vile calumnies so basely heaped upon her. The ATTORNEY-G I;NERAL said, whenever he had occasion to address iheir Lordships on these proceedings, he had reason to complain that ad vantages were taken by the. Counsel opposite. He never addressed the House, but he was an- swered by declamatory addresses ; insinuations were made against his conduct, and topics were brought forward which could only fairly be pro duced in a future stage of the proceedings. He was now charged with being actuated ,by a desire to patch up his case. The. reason why he did not apply on the 17th day of August for. delay was; that he expected the witnesses in town. The application he now made was, not to pro duce new witnesses, but witnesses who had al ways been identified with the case. As he be lieved they Were within a few days journey of E ngland,'he would not have discharged his duty if he had not asked for that trilling delay which he - now required at their Lordships' hands. Leaving the subject entirely to the consideration of their Lordships, he would only state that it would be no injustice to the Queen, as she would have. an opportunity of hearing 04 , 4 r evidence before she was asked, for her defence: The LORD CHANCELLOR thought, it a case of the greatest importance, attain the present in stance upon merely an assumed case, it ‘vo , ild be hiely dangerous and unjust to grant an adjourn ment. if even proved, he'.would not state that the adjonrnment. would be a: fair course. The AtterneyGeneral should say if what these .Lu- gaman witnesses were to depose had been stated in the •Attorney-Gein , ral's opening speech, in order to pro ve that tiiey were not new wit- nesSeS. Lord LIVERPOOL said, that the special grounds upon wilich the Attorney-General had applied for delay, should be proved at the bar.- It was important for the"Couusel - for the Queen to say, whether they would finiAi their ,cross-examina tion now, or in future; because, before the sum ming up of the Attorney•-GenerLl, he would be competent toscall the Luganian witnesses without any special application. If the Queen's Counsel said_that they would finiAi the cross-examination 14t one'then the Counsel for the Crowq must proceed at ion,ce and close the.case. Lord EIItiKINE said, th 6 delay required was monstrously repugnantto,every principle of jus tice, and that it wasmerely an attempt to make a new cage, at least it was to add to it, and who ever heard that under any circumstances, After a cause was,ouce begun, such a delay was granted: His Lordship adverted to Bellinghatn!s_cltse, which an application :to postpone • the trial bath .been refused, although it-had•,been shown-to.tho ) :Court that several witnesses were on their jo,or 'ney.frorn Liverpool , to prove the insanity of the . prisoner. EVen an earthquake ,should not duce him.to yield to such,an• ,unfair interruption , of justice.—(Cries:of " Adjourn, adjourn.) • Lord GREY said, that the House ought. not to adjourn withont coming .to some conclusion : upon the question which would be for discuS sion in the morning. He wished the Lord Chancellor - to put the question to the Attorney' General—" Are you now ready to prove at the Bar of the Muse those facts which can only . entitle you to be heard, in such an application?" The ATTO E Y-GENER..I I; replied, that he thought he was prepared with documents suffi' . cient to skew that he Was entitled to the favor' he asked. _ Earl Gn - EY'Said, that it was a monstrous. proe Osition;contrary - to the rules of practice in the Courts of Law, and was unequalled, except by the Attorney-General making it when he WO only able to say, " I believe I shall be able to show sufficient grounds for the application." The Lonn CANCEtLOIL then put two queFid . tions. to the Counsel—one to the Attorney-Geue ral, and the other to Mr. Brougham. The first to the Attorney4eneral was, " •on what evidence or documents do you make this application ?." The. ATTORNEY and SOLICITOR-C EIIERAL Tv , plied, that they had a letter, to which was an• nexed an affidavit, which le,p, - er, &C. had arrived from Lugano, and which stated the ret.sons the witnesses had beeti detained in Italy. Bali Counsel strongly contended that such evi - (iencl . irtiuld, in a Court below, be quite , sufficient to put oil' a trial. If it was said that affidavits could not be produced in that Hotise as evidence, the! replied in answer to that that a person could be produced at the Bar of the House, ,who would siv - ear to his belief of the facts, and that was lilt that was required in the Courts below. The question put to Mr. Brougham was the following :—" If the Attorney-General Nvill now state that-his case is closed, will you -waive your right of cross-Otarnination of , the witnesses at II future period ?" iVir. flaoucli.ot replied, that under these cir cumstances, if One, of the witnesses was called back, and asked two or three questions, he shoujj have nQ objection to waive hiS right a amhiation. • '*" The House then adjourned till Ten o'Cioc i ; this day. A scientific Gentleman has-recently completed a lamp, which casts no shadow, whilst its lie‘t can be with ease increased on the lover or upper, part of the apartment at pleasure. A bean stalk which is seven feet five inche 6 high, and upon which are seve.nty-six pods, 15 ' now growing in afield belonging to Mr.We.EN,og of Brenley, in Kent.. A melancholy circumstance occurred lately I t Brussels :—A man was taken ill in the night• and his wife rose to procure assistance, but be' fore she returned he had expired.. When :OIL; perceived that, she exclaimed, " Oh, Mother 0 ' God ! grant that I May not survive him l" and 111 .an hour after she was 'herself a corpse. .A fire broke out a few nights ago at Hitch:l9lT in Suffolk,- on - the premises of Mr.PE . Anc; which three barns were destroyed, with their contents, the cow-house, and other with a:great quantity of wheat, oats and 'faY; no doubt is entertained but that the fire s'; 3s caused by some wicked incendiary. The Sheriff-Substitute of Ayrshire has rece ive ] a communication 'from the Secretary of State, in timating '" the King's command, that'the evco; 'lion of the sentence.of Death, passed on ThorrW 111‘Kay, ,now in Air jail, be respited, until IV farther signification of his Majesty's pleaSare." Not less than fifty houses, exclusive of w it ; houses, ACS were destroyed by fire in the nig h of Friday se"nnight,, at Cashel, in Ireland. We are authorized to state, that Sir Franc ° , Colombine Daniel, M.D. has accepted tie sYI pointment of Treasurer to the Medical Boar' established by Messrs. COOPER. and Co. at OW' lotte House', Surrey.—Messrs. COOPER and 6.°; have frequently inserted Letters from 0.6° 1 ;1 individuals who have beets 'radically not only of Ruptures, but of other d 3",; gerous diseases, too often deemed incurable , Professional men, whose practice iS confined The late Duke of Bedford unfortunately lost 11 . 1 : life in a few hours, by a strangulated •Mr. Mills, of the Kent-road, alFo lost his lice ~v a few hours ; Mr. Shearman, of P i le End, wa 4 afflicted for many years, and mans', many eth e r , whose names will never appear NVithOUt their ec quest. Mr. J ohuson, of the Borongh, who had b r , 17 months under the care of s , 2veral e minent su se goons, with a most•dam;erous disease, and wh°,it life was given over, as appeared 1 :y his afada r before Mr. Alderman - Wood, then Lord MaY°r: and whose case has beeii seenb v rn9r. than WO su tb , geOns, was in a few weeks restored to Perfect hefi l d f Such are the proceedings at the Medical 13°a . g , charlotte: House, Charlotte-strec.t, Blackfriliret, road ; and Woodztock House, Bond-st'' e o under the immediate direction of MessrS2C o° 'lo and Co""., who are consulted daily from eigl i l t l e , the morning until eight in the evening. ---- 1 1 0 ,0 chanics have advice gratis every evening I r o jl six to eight, and on Sunday mornings aI twelve o'clock. ~~ 0 1 MARRIED. . Es 4 Olt Tuesday, nt St. Cle - ntent Dativ4, M o rri 4, liatavi3, Elizt., second daltglittr of the Lite & wine' II) Esq., of Cambet well.. "• MD. ' vt' At Demerara, nn the nth Jun E e, io the =2,7t1) rear of hi CO. of an alarminc epidenOc fever prey: tent at that pla ce ' James Grant, of the briOlory of Aberbeen. - . i t - .. -- - - - (1 0 1 % LONDON: Print ed,by J. 13. C.AttsLA 'LIN, of Nu. 2 ;,' SC. : " t i Ormond-street . Queen-spt.tre: and Publi shed ict° i' k' SCRIPPS, 'of No. 7. Soot b Molton-street, at • , oi al i Otlicit, No. 114. Strand ; where Adrettisemently Letters, &c. (p.,qt-mti.l) twist . b r add , esscd. ;#' l ; N 'V tA, t I , " or 'UM p , '3IIAI Sus - cs t () .11 , ero„% C lo c; •0011 r lel l , ettc --____ I% 1)1,1 ft,113, itt Iprh t11) 1 ! ;1 ' • t 4 ;:c i a rt: v;.f t. "s