The Sun. — London, England, 1842-02-01 00:00:00

MORNING SUN V ICTUALLERS. LORD ASHBURTON. . (FRom A CORRESPONDENT.) : 1: .v, .... - --......A.0nTrE ili!l4ll4° -:'._ Zaer:A9:. 1,- • ,:, ~,,, •A: ' I sr ' TELE NEW UNLICENSED The fate of, this country has been to be ruled by a confederacy of monopolists, equally opposed to the Sove reign, the people, the Constitution, and the religion of the country. Of what have they been the monopolists ? Of every thing.—(Cheers.) They have been monopolists of religious liberty.—(Cheers.) They have been mono polists of personal freedom. They have trafficked in slaves and the souls of men. They have been monopo lists of political power, to the disfranchisement of thou sands in every part of the country. What have been their party conflicts but struggles for the monopoly of place, and pension s , an d- patronage, an d pe lf, an d pay?--(Great cheering.) In what light are we called to regard them this day ? As monopolists of the people's bread ; as a tricked combination of victuallers—( Laughter)—conspir ing to raise the - price of bread, a class of offenders which till lately was held by the common law of England to be criminals punishable with fine and imprisonment.— (near, and cheers.) Were they punished according to their deserts they would now take their place along with the inmates of the dungeon, and those who were at the treadmill.—(Great laughter.) What was our present Parliament ? A Parliament of provision merchants.— (Hear, hear.) Let them be honest and put up , their appropriate sign. Let them announce over their j shop doors, " Messrs. Buckingham, Graham, Richmond, Peel, and Co., sole provision- merchants to the people of Great Britain and Ireland.—(Loud laughter.) -For bread, beef, pork, mutton, butter, and beans, inquire within.—(ll , airs of laughter.) N.B. No competition allowed. No connection with the shop over the water." _(Continned laughter.) The Corn-law was designed to make food scarce, in order that it may be made dear. Nothinc else. And why dear ? That landlords may pocket the price. Who gave the landowners the power to do so ? They took the power themselves.—(Hear.) By what means did they persuade the people to accept it at their hands ? By presenting it at the point of the bayonet.—(Hear.) How have they perpetuated it ? By the same means.—(Hear, hear.) It is a law to put a whole people on short allowance. A whole people tijik I say ? No ; those who make the famine spare the selves.— (Hear.) Were it a heaven-sent famine, all iandd be afflicted. When God punished the Egyptians with sore plagues, they entered the palace of Pharaoh awl his magicians ; but our modern Pharaohs and their sliding-scale enchanters torment not themselves ; they torment the people.—(Cheers.) Can any act be con- , eeived more wicked than the curtailment of the supply of bread to an industrious people ? Can there be a more frightful despotism ? On board a man-of-war, when provisions are scarce, the man who is the despot of the ship, and might shoot a refractory sailor dead at his feet, dare not take a crumb of biscuit, or a drop of water, more than the cabin-boy. He dare not help himself.--(Hear.) How is it with us ? Do the gentry ashore share and share alike with those who work the ship, and go aloft, and reef, and steer ? lie wished they did.—(Hear.) Parliament would soon be summoned, in good earnest, for the despatch of sundry divers and important busi ness"—(Laughter)-4nd the Corn-laws would be totally repealed in both Houses of the Legislature.—Mr. Thomp son's Speech at Edinburgh. The appointment of Lord Ashburton, and the con stant reference made to it in the daily papers, would twetn to indicate a great reliance on the success of the mission, and most certainly betokens a wish to magnify its importance. How far the ends attainable by a tah;nted man may be accomplished by Lord Ashburton, is, :of- course, in the future, and it is difficult to calculate upon the probable result ; but there is one question which, in the mouths of many, has not yet had the . ad vantage of publication, and is far from easy of solution. Has Lord Ashburfon received his appointment for pri vate interest, or those of his country ? Does his connec • iion 'with the house of Baring and Co. not render it more than possible that he will not neglect to super intend the trading affairs of that house ? And do not the immense cotton dealings of the Barings almost exclude the hope that any time can be found by the Noble Lord to transact public business in America? Assuredly in this easeyersonal is the most profitable to attend to. Let the pubbe, then, know why we have determined hastily on sending a Special Minister to America ; and although, from the vast American speculations in cotton, &c., of the house of Baring and Co., it is almost a delusion to imagine any event of public benefit can occur, yet there is consolation in the consequent paucity of blunders that may be anticipated from the Plenipotentiary. EAST INDIA SHIPPING. Arrivals—Simarang, Robertson, from Madras, in the Downs, 'ailed Oct. 6, Cape Dec. 9 ; Hindostan, Red man, from Ma4ras, in the Downs, sailed Oct. 6, Cape Dec. 2, St. Helend j?ec. 17 ; Tapley, Oc t . from Bengal, off Torbay, sii9ed July . 3, Cape, Nov. 24 ;' Hotspur, Wilson, from Benga!, 111 the Downs, sailed' Sep*, 1, St. Helena, Dec. 10. Arrivals in Table Bay, Cape of Good Hope—The So vereign, Archer, Dec. 3, from Mossell Bay ; • Margaret; Canney, from Calcutta ; L Aleide, 4th, from Bourbon , Harlequin, Harrison, from Singapore ; Bordeaux Mutes* 7th, from Bordeaux. Arrivals in Simon's Bay—Her Majesty's ship Lilly, Allen, N0v.30, from Mauritius. Departures from Table Bay—Levant, llolmes, Nov. 30, to Pernambuco and Boston ; Royal Albert, Tessier, 3d; To' London ;Mary_ Heartly, Webb, 4th, to Demerara; Sovereign, 7th, to li..l)isna. Departure from Simons Bay—Her Majesty's ship Fantoine, Butterfield, Dec. 1, to West Coast of Africa. Arrivals at St. Helena—Nanine, Tartone, Dee. 14, from Java to Havre • Beulah, James, from China to Londim ; Ceres, Pecker, 15, from Bourbon, and sailed to Nantes, since totally , a reeked (24th Jan.), at the entrance -on the Loire ; one man lost. l)cparture from Mauritius—Mermaid, Sedgwick, Nov. 2, to London. Arrivals in Table Bay—Lloyds and James, Dee. 7, from London ; Cambridge, tith, from Liverpool. De partures—Maid of Mona, 7th, tC , Algoa Bay ; Reflectoi• and Harlequin, 9th, to London. The General Steam Navigation Co.npany's ves sel the Ocean, J. Fife, from Rotterdam, arrived St the Custom-house on Sunday, with the Dutch mail. The following were the persons invited by Sir Robert Peel, to meet the King of Prussia, at his residence in Whitehall : Henry Hallam,. Esq., . Samuel Rogers, Esq., Professor Airey, the Astronomer Royal, Rev. Dr. Buckland, Sir John Herschel, E. Land seer, Esq., Sir Martin Shee, Sir Richard Westmacett, Sir Robert Smirke, Charles Barry, Esq., (Architect of the Houses of Parliament), Right Hen. J. W. Croker, Win. H. Hamilton, Esq., Sir Robert Inglis, Bart., Sir Robert Wilson, Sir Howard Douglas, Sir George Cock burn, Right lion. W. E. Gladstone, Lord Stanley, "Sit James Graham, Right lion. H. Goulburn, Sir Edward Xnatehbull, Sir henry Ilardinge: It is understood that the King expressed a wish to meet some of the most dis tinguished men in the several departments of art and science. Mr. Colnaghi, of Pall-mall East, was in attend ance at Sir Robert Peel's house, with several of the best examples of the art of engraving of the English school, which were inspected by the King of Prussia with the greatest interest. OttTON.—ln the parish of Orton there lived two tradesmen, who were brothers—each happened to be born in the same month of the year—to die at the :same age, each having attained his 81st year—the one_ was married. seven years before the other, and died seven years before the other. Not less remarkable is the coincidence in their respective families—to each was born six children—three sons and t'iree daughters—who were all living after the death of their fathers—Kendal Mercury. The laws of England have been the subject of eulogy to many sagacious and learned men. I Lind them often dilatory, often uncertain, often contradictory, often cruel, often ruinous.: Whenever they find a man down they keep him so, and the. more pertinaciously, the more earnestly he appeals tOithem. Like tilers, in mending one' hole they always snake another. There is no country in which they move with such volocity where life- is at stake, or where property is 'to be defended so slowly. Can it be wondered that, upon a bench under so rotten an effigy of justice, sat a Saggs, a .;efferies, a Finch, and a Page !—Law has become in England not only the most expensive, but the most rapacious and dishonest of trades.—Lander. s PIRACY IN THE CIIAI;NEL.—The following strange story is copied from the Morniny Ilerettl:—" A most daring and unaccountable act of piracy was com mitted during Tuesday evening in Falmouth harbour. by the crew of the brigantine Brisk, of Bristol, having got the vessel under weigh and sailed (luring the absence of the master, Capt: John Sims, who went on shore in the af ternoon in a boat belonging to another ship lying close by, With two or three other captains ; and on going off, about ten o'clock with the same party, found his vessel was seen to have gone out of the harbour by the mate of the adjacent vessel one hour before. Captain Sims proceeded imme diately to every part of the harbour to leeward, and onl; gave up the search on the following night ; but no fur ther intelligence or clue could be obtained to throw light on the mysterious proceedings of his people. The Brisk is laden with a most valuable cargo, which is . insured to nearly 20,0001. The ship's papers and the Captain's clothes and money, are all exposed to the crew's grasp ; but their , object cannot be divined. They Were engaged merely for the run to Bristol, which at times induces the 'Captain to conceive that they got the vessel under sail, and started to accomplish tht voyage` with or (rather) without him ; but he is in such a state of mind that he is not able to remember any thing from their conduct to deduce one single idea as to the course they will pursue. The wind, subsequent to "ilint, and all the fol!owing (lay was most violent at they cannot, therefore, have got out of tle Channel ; but either have put into a French port, or have been driven up Cbannel, probably keeping her ot . the English toast. Captain Sims expresses his deter mination to prosecute them for piracy whenever ant. wheresoever they may he feund. The crew consisted 0 /he mate, three men, and two boys, which is light for a vessel pf 190 tons. , WHo WOUND UP THE CLOCK?—On Tuestia% morning St. Peter's clock was sot goin g . Why it may h e reasonably asked. If the Churchwardens were right why not have the courage stopped, the proper time, It I ordering it to be s . ti l q; to persist in the act t a,t have bee n give an explanation of am defend their co nd uct they were not right—if the Rate- payers the three . months seriously inconvenienced during th© by a contemptible desire o n part of some individuals to show their spleen and spite , do the parish officers who gave in to a paltry feeling think they a r e . now: , to esk . ap , s and make it up, because, 4. * unwhipped—" shake hat i `forsooth, when the town has b ee n disturbed and t h e w Pure h scandalised by their sillyflconduct, they choose to 4 4tiDunlop, Esq., who had be en Sheriff of "lifirti°6l` going ?—Brighton " , ;•et for 25 years, died at his house in Edits -I.N last, after an illness of about ten LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Jan. 31. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. THE EARL OF STANFORD. The LORD CHANCELLOR, gave j udgment this morning in this case, which was argued a short tune since upon motion to take a petition of re-hearing, which had been presented off the files of the Court. His Lordship, after shortly adverting to the circumstances of the case, w hi c h w e have already. given, stated his opinion to be that the parties were entitled to present a petition of re-hearing, and dismissed the motion. WOODCOCK V. RENNECK. The LORD CHANCELLOR also gave judgment in this case, which was an appeal for the judgment of the pre sent Master of the Rolls. The question in the case arose under the will of a person named Linton. His Lordship ordered the judgment of the C - ottrt below to be affirmed. BLUNDELL V. GLADSTONE. Our readers will recollect that a short time since this case was argued before his Lordship, with reference to the will of a gentleman named Blundell, who had amassed a large fortune, and resided in the neigh bourhood of Liverpool. His Lordship intimated on Saturday that he should this day state the course he intended to p ursue w i t h respect to it, and accordingly this morning, on taking his seat, his Lordship stated that he considere the matter of such importance as, to render it necessary to have the subject arg ued again by one counsel on each side before two of the Common Law Judges and himself upon the point that was raised at the bar as to the admissibility of certain parole evidence. Mr. Justice Matteson and Mr. Justice Me.ule had kindly consented to attend the Court on 'any day that might be convenient. Thus the matter refits at present, as no day is fixtt for the hearing. This being the last day of ililary Term, the Court proceeded with appeal motions, but no case of interest came before his Lordship in the course of the morning. VICE-CHANCELLORS' COURT, Jan. 31. (Before Vice-Chancellor WIGRA M. ) THE EAST INDIA COMPANY V. THE COOPERS' COMPANY His HONOUR pronounced judgment in this case. He had already expressed his opinion that the provision by the plaintiffs of the ground in question, explained as it was by the lease, and the expenditure of money 25 years af ter its commencement, could not, on this record, be deemed acts of part performance sufficient to take the case out of the operation of the Statute of Frauds ; and that if the plaintiffs could not sustain their case upon one or other of those grounds, he was prohibited by set tled rules of law from enforcing the agreement alleged in the bill. That opinion disposed of the whole case, so far as it depended upon any supposed original contract en titling the plaintiffs to a license to alien. But if the Coopers' Company, with notice of the lease to Trinder, had stood by and allowed the plaintiffs to expend their money in building upon the premises, that might give the plaintiffs an equity to an injunction preventing the Coopers' Com pany from availing themselves of the forfeiture ; but further than that he could not go, unless the expendi ture could be considered as an act of part performance. An injunction for such a purpose, however, was not the object of the bill. The bill sought in effect to have it declared that the plaintiffs ought now to be in the same position as they would have been in if the Coopers' Com pany, after the execution of the case of the 30th of Oc tober, 1770, had granted a license to alien to Mr. Trin der, which, according to the decision in Dumper's case, would have for ever discharged the proviso in the lease against alienation. Being of opinion, therefore, that he could not, in that suit, make any such decree, he ab stained from expressing any opinion whether the alleged agreement, as set out in the bill, admitted of that con struction or not. The only question which he had then to consider was, whether, when the bill was framed for the specific purposes he had mentioned, he ought to give relief founded upon an equity , which was not set up in the bill. That the Counsel for the Coopers' Company bad insisted he ought not to do, and, in strictness he thought he ought not to do it in the parti cular case before him ; for, independent of the frame and scope of the bill to which his attention had been directed during the arguments for the Coopers' Com pany, the expenditure by the plaintiffs was immaterial, so far as the equity of the plaintiffs' case depended upon their right to the specific performance of an agreement; whereas, upon the equity to which he thought they might be entitled, that expenditure as a matter of fact, and under the circumstances in which it took place, was of the very essence of the case, and a decree founded upon it might be a surprise upon the defendants, and work injustice. He thought, therefore, that justice would be best consulted by his dismissing the bill ; but, being of opinion that the plaintiffs might have an equity not set up by the bill, he thought the order of dismissal should be accompanied by a declaration that it should be without prejudice to any other bill which the plain tiffs might be advised to file. DUKE V. APPLEBY. His Magogß gave judgment in this case. It was a bill filed by a mortgagee to foreclose a mortgage, the mort gager having become insolvent, and his interest in the equity of redemption being vested in the provisional as signee. It was admitted that a decree of foreclosure must be made, and the only question was, whether the provisional assignee was to have his costs paid by the mortgagee, and the mortgagee was to be allowed to add them to his debt. His Honour refused to allow the costs. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, Jan. 31. EX PARTE THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. Mr. TALBOT applied for a writ of certiorari to bring up into this Court the inquisition taken by the Mayor of Reading, at Reading, on the body of Richard Woolley, who hail died at Reading orate inJuries he had received inconsequence of the dreadful accident which occurred at the Sonning Cutting on 25th December last. The Coroner had levied a deodand on the carriage and en gines, which the Learned Counsel contended he had no right to do, inasmuch as the accident had not occurre d within the boundary of his jurisdiction. •He might have a right to hold the inquisition, but he had exceeded hi s jurisdiction in levying a deodand. Application had been made to Mr. Justice Williams on the subject on Satur day, and the Learned-Judge had directed the application to be made to the full Court. The COURT at first granted a rule nisi, but after some time, the Judges having consulted together, Lord DENmAN said the Court is of opinion that the writ bad better go at once to bring up the inquisition. The LEARNED COUNSEL then said he had made an apOcation, in a case of a similar nature, to Mr. Justice Willi am s, on Saturday, who had granted a rule nisi. Perhaps, in that case, the Court would order the writ to go at once also. Lord DENMAN—You had better apply to Mr. Justice Williams on the subject. CRIMINAL INFORMATION AGAINST THE SUNDAY TIMES THE QUEEN V. CHAPMAN AND OTHERS. On the first day of this term, the Attorney-General had obtained a rule calling upon the defendants, the printers and proprietors of tho Sunday Times newspaper, to show cause why a criminal information should not to filed against them for the publication of a libel reflecting on the character of Mr. Grove, one of the magistrates 01 the Greenwich Police Court. . The SOLICITOR-GENERAL this' morning showed cause against the rule, and said that the proceeding arose out of certain proceedings which had been taken before Mr. Grove, in his magisterial capacity, who had, in the mouth of October, issued a warrant for ejecting Mrs. Grahain from certain premises occupied by her, for Which, however, no arrears of rent were due. On the 3d November, the Police-officer applied to Mr. Grove on the subject of the execution of the warrant, and stating that Mrs. Graham was near her confinement, and requesting to know whether under those circum stance the warrant was to be executed. Mr. Grove having had medical evidence tendered as to the dange rous state of Mrs. Graham, directed the warrant to be xecnted. Mr. and Mrs. Graham were removed, and week after Mrs. Graham was confined of a dead child. It was in relation to these circum stances that the article in question, which imputed to Mr. Grove, that he had acted with haste, and inhumanity, that the article in question had been writ ten. Now, in showing cause against the rule, he would first of all call the attention of the Court to the Act of Parliament under which Mr. Grove had taken upon himself to act. He contended he had no authority whatever to act. The tenantry ought to have been determined, and the warrant ought to have been issued by the Justices in Petty Sessions assembled. Now Mr. Grove was sitting alone, and although, under the Police Act, one magistrate was enabled to do any acts previously requiring the presence of two, yet it was expressly provided that no magistrate should, under that Act, be competent to do acts 'required to be done at Petty or Special Sessions. He therefore conceived it, at all events, extremely doubtful whether Mr. Grove had any authority to act at all under that statute. Ile, however, had thcught proper to do so, and had issued his warrant on the 6th October, which warrant he had not set out in his affidavit, and therefore it was impossible to know whether it was in accordance with the statute or not. Application had been made to Mr. Grove in behalf of Mr. Graham, and the state of Mrs. Graham was represented to Mr. Grove by a medical man. Mr. Grove had ordered his warrant to be executed nevertheless, and it would be for the Court to say, under the circumstances, whether Mr. Grove was in a posi tion to apply to the Court for a criminal information ? The article was a comment upon a report which had appeared in one of the daily journals, of what had passed before Mr. Grove on . the occasion in question, and the truth of which report was verified by af fidavit. Mr. Macdonald, the surgeon, had ra prsented to Mr. Grove that the consequences if the removal of Mrs. Graham would be the death of !ither herself or her child. She was confined a week After, and the child died. A letter from her husband stating this fact had appeared in the Morning Advertiser, not in the Sunday Tunes, and it was the comment on that; account of which Mr. Grove complained. That irticle had accused Mr. Grove first of having offered an mwarrantable insult to the people of Ireland, which Mr. ,;rove had not attempted to deny; in fact, he admitted .hat he had made use of unwarrantable language, and herefore the only portion of the article which lie was !ailed upon to defend was that which accused Mr. Grove inhumanity, in regard to directing the removal of Mrs. ;raham. The truth of the report which had appeared n the papers of what had , passed before Mr. Grove, when Mr. Macdonald, the surgeon, had distinctly stated to Mr. Grove that he should not consider it safe to remove Mrs. Graham in her then state, and when Mr. Grove had denominated such an opinion a trumpery excuse, and had directed the order to be executed, was not at tempted to be denied. That statement had appeared in the Morning Advertiser, and what the Sunday Times had charged him with was with inhumanity to Mrs. Graham, And with insulting conduct to Mr. Macdonald, and Mr. Macdonald had pledged himself to the accuracy of that report, and Mr. Graham had in the Morning Advertiser of the lath of November inserted a letter, stating that Mr. Slacdonald's predictions as to the consequences of Mrs. Graham's removal had been fatally realised in the death of her child ; that letter had been ctu_oted in th e Sunday Ti mes as having apper-ed in the Morning Ad• cellist'', and yet Mr. Grove bad chosen to proceed THE SUN, LOI*I - Doisr, w TuEBDAIt, rEBRITARY 1, 1842. against the Sunday . Tatra. Mr. Macdonald had made in affidavit for defendant, in which he attributed the death of the child to natural causes, but had not commu nicated that opinion to Mr. Graham previous to his writing his letter to the Morning Advertiser. The Se cretary of State seeing these paragraphs in the Morn;ng Advertiser, wrote a letter to Mr. Grove, calling his at tention to those articles, and asking for explanation. Sir James Graham made no allusion to the Sunday Times in his letter,, and Mr. Grove, rather unfairly, in his affi lavit stated that after the publication in the Sunday Times he had received a letter from Sir James Graham. Now, 'Sir James Graham's letter alluded to the Morning Advertiser only, and in his answer to Sit James, he stated that he intended to move for a caiminal information , against that paper (not mentioning what) on the first day of term , and the answer to that expressly mentioning the Mo rning Advertiser, again stated that the explanation was satisfactory. Mr. Grove did not move for a criminal information against the Advertiser, as he. had pledged himself to do to the Secre tary of State, because in the affidavits it was sworn that the facts there related were true, but he does against the Sunday Times, because it had commented upon the ac count. That was not the way to vindicate his character. The charge was in the. Morning Advertiser, and in his letter to the Secretary of State he had pledged himself ‘,o take proceedings against that paper. He does no mcli thing; but moves against the Sunday Times, to which no allusion whatever had been made in Sir James Graham's letter. Mr. Grove, in his affidavit, made n ) reference - to the publications in the. Morning Ad vertiser, 'but confined himself to the Sunday Times. Ile answer he gave to the charge was, that on Bth October he had told Graham he would have three weeks to look out for a lodging, who stated that he could not look out for a lodging, and should not attempt to do so. 'lr. Graham distinctly denied that he had stated any thing of the sort. He had said distinctly that the state of his wife was such as would prevent her removal. Mr. Grove swore that Mr. Macdonald, on being asked if there would .be any danger in the removal of Mrs. Graham, distinctly said, certainly not if' she had any place to go to. Now Mr. Macdonald in the course of his evidence had certainly made use of an expression of that nature, but it conveyed a very incorrect idea of what Mr. Macdonald had stated,. and on Mr. Glove's own showing his reply to Mr. Macdonald, " There are plenty of hotels to which she can be removed," was cer tainly harsh and inhuman. These were persons occu pying lodgings at 4s. a week. Was it not Mr. Grove's duty when told by a medical man that Mrs. Graham was near her confinement, and that it would be dange rous to remove her if she had no place to go, to examine minutely into the case before abruptly turning round to the officer and saying " this is a trumpery excuse, there is plenty of time before four o'clock; see that the warrant is executed directly." Mr. Grove had denied making use of these expressions to the officer, but they had been taken down at the time, and the correctness of those notes had been verified by affidavit. Mr. Grove had said that he had been inter rupted in an important case by the application for time on the part of Mr. Graham, but that was no excuse for acting with inhumanity. The law allowed 30 days for the execution of the warrant, and the application had been made on the 28th day, so that there was sufficient time for inquiry. Mr. Finch, the Magistrate's clerk, in his affidavit in support of the rule, admitted that he had suggested to Graham the propriety of bringing the surgeon to give evidence as to Mrs. Graham's state; and that seeing Mr. Macdonald th ere , h e interrupte the Magistrate in the investigation of the case then on, and drew his attention to the object for which the parties were in attendance; and it appeared from the evidence ofone of thepolicemen that Mr. Fin c h h a d t o ld M r . G ra h am if h e could procure medical. evidence to satisfy the Magistrate his wife's removal would be att e nd e d with danger, the execution of the warrant would be delayed. Mr. rove had thought proper, in support of this application, to do that which he had no right to do, to file two affidavits accusing Mr. Graham of brutal and improper conduct towards his wife. Now, the facts alleged to have occurred in those affidavits were distinctly denied by Mrs. Graham herself, and by those persons who were alleged to have been present at the time those transactions were stated to have occurred. In reply to that rule there was the affidavit of Mr. Parrett, who had reported the case for the Morning Advertiser, verifying the report which had. appeared in that paper, and which had been copied into 'the Sunday Times, and the deponent distinctly swore that Mr. Grove had made use of the words—" Officer, it is not gone fouro'clock y e t, go a n d see t h e warrant executed now," which Mr. Grove denied having used. There was also an affidavit-from the Editor of the Kentish Mercury, who was present at the time, and who distinctly swore that Mr. Grove had made use of the expressions at tributed to him, and that the report was a correct one. The affidavit of Mr. Macdonald, the surgeon, set forth that he had distinctly told Mr. Grove that Mrs. Graham was in a dangerous and precarious state of health, and that haiing no place to go to, -it would be unsafe to re move her. On which Mr. Grove, in a most offensive and insulting manner, said, " That won't do for me, Sir. ft is all flummery, and an excuse to keep possession of the premises." Now, he would put it to the. Court whe— ther - Mr. Macdonald, a respectable medical man, was not as worthy of belief as Mr. Grove ; and if that affi davit was true, there was no doubt that Mr. Grove had. acted with inhumanity, and that he had no right to come to the Court for a criminal information. Again, Mr. 'Macdonald swore that he had told Mr. Grove he con sidered that he (Mr. Grove) had acted towards him in a very insulting manner, thus distinctly contradicting Mr. Grove ; and in this contradiction he was corroborated by several witnesses. Mr. Macdonald also stated that -the account of the proceedings reported in the Morning Advertiser, and copied into the Sunday Times, was, correct. Now, if that statement was a !orrect report of what had occurred, Mr. Grove had no reason to complain of the comments which had appeared in the "Sunday Times. The letter of the Se cretary of State called his attention to statements in the Morning Advertiser, and those statements Mr. Grove had left untouched. It was a most curious fact, which ap peared from the affidavit of Mr. Graham, that all the eent due to the landlord had been paid ; so that ?the offer of the landlord to give up the arrears alluded to in Mr. Grove's affidavit was merely an offer to give up the rent due for the current week. Such being the state of ' facts, he submitted that Mr. Grove was not entitled to the relief he sought, and 'he trusted that this rule would be discharged. Mr. JARVIS followed on the same side. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, in support of the rule, argued, that, if Mr. Grove - was not es titled to the relief he sought, he was utterly unfitted to hold the situation he filled ; and if every hasty expression made use of by those engaged in the administration of justice were to , )e made the subject of comments, such as those of which Mr. Grove complained, he should like to know how persons engaged in the performance of such deli cate, arduous, and often unpopular duties, as frequently devolved upon them, were to act ? If a garbled state ment of an occurrence in one newspaper was made the subject of calumnious comment in another, was the person attacked to be compelled to pass by the ca l umn y until he had come into that Court to dispute the accu racy of the reporter of the garbled statement ? Was Mr. Chapman to assume that the press could never err ; that ,because there appeared no contradiction to any statement that he might read in any other newspaper, that therefore he was to make that a foundation for calumnious attack ? Could it be contended that the liberty ,of the press went so far as that ? Mr. Grove had directed proceedings to be taken against the Sunday Times before he had received any communication froth the Secretary of State. A notice to quit had been given to Graham in September, and, therefore, Mr. Grove's authority to act was unquestioned ' • in fact, he had no choice. It was big duty to act as he had done, and he could be compelled to act by mandamus, if here. fused. Eight-and-twenty days before, Mr. Grahaniwae told he must obey the law, and he said he should not look for another lodging ; but would make his wife's state An excuse for remaining. That was sworn to, by three .vitnesses. Mr. Graham, in his affidavit, never mei - tioned a single place to which he had applied for lodgings in the interval, nor did his brother, who had ultimately given him an asylum, make any affidavit. How was it he had not sought Dui asylum before ? and why was Mr. Grove • to be made the victim of these vituperations, when he had merely performed his duty to the best of his ability? Was it to be tolerated that these comments should be made ? Was it not natural that Mr. Grove should make inquiry into the conduct of Mr. Graham, to his wife, during the three weeks which he had to seek for lodgings ? He was perfectly justified in doing so, to show that Mr. Graham had made this complaint out sf revenge on Mr. Grove, in which he was abetted by certain newspapers, which dressed out a Sunday feast of ,lander for their customers. He had not, in moving for this rule, read any part of the affidavits charging Mr. Graham with ill-using his wife, bccause he had never iti andtrovethecauses? or he had denied distinctly that he had performed that had behaved improperly to the surgeon, o o s f ee evidence he might well imagine there was some sort equivoca tion lurking, as, having been called on to depose toa fact, he had, instead, offered an opinion. It was Mr. Graham's duty to have found a place ; he had neglected to do so, and Mr. Grove had no discretion left to hi m ; h e was bound to - act, for there was no evidence to show that Airs. Graham could not be moved. There was nothing to show that Mr. Grove had seen the paragraph in the Morning Ackertiser. There could be no doubt but that the article in the Sunday Times was of a highly libel ous character, and that it was intended to apply to Mr. Grove ; and that could not be-got rid of by raising an issue as to the accuracy of a report in t he M o rn ing Ad vertiser. He denied that that report was a fa i r report. ['he question was one of the .highest importance to Mr. Grove, and if the rule were refused, whether justly or unjustly, he must be removed; as one whose efficiency was so impaired that it was impoisible he could do his duty. Mr. THESIGER folloWed on the: same side, and con tended that Mr. Grove had no power whatever to stop the execution of the warrant, even if Mr. Graham's ex- cuses had been true, which they were not. Mr. JusticeWummAN—i-Did any OW oppose Graham's application to have the execution of the warrant suse pended ? Mr. JAuvis---No, my Lord. Mr. THESIGER contendesiihat Mr. Grove had no dis cretion, the landlord hating applied for its execution the day before. Lord DENMAN — Whendid the medical man first make his appearance ? Mr. THESIGER—At half past three that day. Mr. JAavxs—At the sitting of the Court. Mr. Grove did not make his appearance until half-past titre% Mre T HES IGEA then proceeded with hi s argument, an d submitted that the rule must be made absolute. Lord DENMAN said that it was important that Magis trates should have every protection they were entitled to, but that they should have no more ; and that, there fore, the Court would go further into the facts contained in ie affidavits before judgment was given. BAIL COURT, Jan. 31. HENN° V. SMITH. This was an action brought by the plaintiff, who had been a sailor on board the Surprise, a vessel trading to the South Sea, to obtain damages from the defendant for flogging him in the island of Java. The same plain tiff had also brought an action against a person named Bennett, the owner of . the vessel. Both causes were Bet down to be tried at Croydon ; and the plaintiff having been nonsuited in the action against Bennett, that against Smith was withdrawn for that time. A rule for the costs in the latter action was also obtained. Mr. JAMES now showed cause against the rule. It appeared the consent to withdraw the action against Smith was obtained in consideration of the permission granted by the plaintiff to defendant to examine wit nesses in the action, who were about to proceed to Java, whither a commission should be sent, if such per mission was not granted. Under these circumstances, it could not be expected that the costs would be given. It was not intended that the action should be held in ,ter rbrem over the plaintiff, and they would undertake to go to trial as soon as possible. Mr. llAursE appeared for the defendant, but no oppo sition was given.—Rule discharged. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Jan. 31. WELD V. WARD, AND S -11 00LBRIDGE v. WARD. This was an issue from this Court, under the Tithe Commutation Act, to fix the modus of tithe of a parish in Kent, of which the defendant is the rector and the plain tiffs represent the parishion ers ,. who resist the rector's claims. The issue was tried at Maidstone, and the ver dict was in favour of the defendant. Mr. Sergeant Channell since obtained a rule nisi for a new trial, against which Mr. Sergeant Botnpas showed cause. Their Lordships this day gave read over the notes of the trial, judgment. Having The Lon]) CHIEF JUSTICE said that the Court was of opinion that the case ought to undergo another consi deration, and be sentslown again.—The rule fora nevi trial was therefore made absolute. CRIMINAL COURT. The Sessions at the Old Bailey commenced yesterday morning, before the Lord Mayor, the Recorder, Alder men, and Sheriffs. The Grand Jury having been sworn, The RECORDER delivered his charge, and said the calendar which was lying before him contained the names of 244 prisoners, and he apprehended the number would be much augmented during the course of their labours. This would impose upon them a task of some length; and he doubted not the Jury would perform it cheerfully, knowing that the result of their inquiries were extremely important. In general the cases comprehended in the calendar did not present any matters of difficulty in point of law, and Ile did not anticipate there would be difficulty in the discharge of their duties. There were a few cases, however, more serious in their nature than the rest, and attended with some peculiarities of circumstances, and in consequence of those peculiarities it would perhaps be necessary for him to make a few re marks. 'There was one case, or rather four charges, against one individual for uttering forged orders, or warrants, for the payment of money. The charge of forgery had been defined as a false making of instru ments, which purported to be on the face of them good and valid, with a view to fraud. Now, these in question were instruments which were not good and valid on the face of them, in consequence of the absence of a stamp, by which stamp it was necessary to give validity to such instruments. But it had been de cided, and on the soundest principles, that where the forged instrument was unstamped, in cases where the law re quired a stamp, no defence could be made upon that ground. Therefore if the case was made out to their satisfaction it would be no answer to say the instrument was unstamped. He thought it best not to advert to the details of this case, because they would appear fully be fore them, and the observations he had already made with respect to the case would be more fully understood when the facts were developed to them. There was a serious charge of stabbing and cutting with intent to do some grievous bodily harm, and where severe injury had been inflicted. He alluded to this case, although the facts were simple, because the party making the attack was represented to have been in a state of intoxication, and he (the Recorder) was bound to say that intoxication was no answer to the charge. Although the party was represented as intoxicated they would have to consider whether the facts when presented to them did not show a previous intention to do mischief and harm. There was a charge of an assault with intent to ravish, and it was a case which appeared to have been very much investigated by the Magistrates. It appeared that the same witness had undergone examinations from time to time, in order thoroughly to elicit the whole truth. The whole of these examinations would be laid before them. The statements would be necessarily ex parte, and they would have to con sider whether these statements were to be credited, and if they made up their minds as to that subject they would then have to consider whether the facts constituted an as sault, and whether that assault was against the will of the party or not. If, upon consideration, they thought this was the case, it would be their duty to find a true bill, and to put the case in the course of further inquiry. He should not have trespassed upon their attention with these observations but that the case was one of a pecu liar character. Although the facts would be fully inves tigated before the Petty Jury, still it was the duty of the Grand Jury, if they disbelieved the statement brought before them, to throw their shield of protection over the prisoner, and not put the accused party in jeopardy by a trial. There was a charge of a serious character against the husband of administering, or attempting to adminis ter, poison to Isis wife. This case would require their most serious consideration. On the one hand, they would have to consider whether there was reason to be lieve that the party charged was the party supplied with the deleterious drug, or whether the charge was instituted falsely from malicious motives. He should say in his judgment of the facts presented, that it would be well to submit the case to further investigation. lie did not think it was necessary to trouble them with any further remarks ; he would, however, venture to remind them that it was necessary that a majority of their body should concur in any presentment they might make, and that that majority should not be less than twelve of their number. With these remarks he would at once remit them to their duties, assuring them that the Court as then constituted or when the Judges came down, would cheerfully afford them any information they might re quire respecting the severalseases to come before them. The Grand Jury then retired to their room. Archibald Leslie, aged 25, was indicted for unlawfully obtaining from Michael Henry hart, a quantity of clothes, and also some money, by means of false pre tences. Mr. Payne conducted the prosecution, and Mr. Ballan tine appeared for the defendant. From the evidence adduced it appeared that the pro secutor is a slop-seller, and carries on his business in Rat cliffe Highway. On the 20th December the defendant, with whom he had had some slight acquaintance pre viously, went to his shop, accompanied by. a man whose name he represented to be William Bowch, and who, he said r iutd a claim upon the mixed Commission, appointed by the British and Portuguese Governments to investi gate the claims of British subjects upon the Portuguese Government, and that the Commissioners had awarded him a sum of 651. 14s. 4d., and had given him a docu ment to that effect, winch he wished to dispose of, and asked Mr. Hart to purchase it. The prisoner at the time said lie knew Bowch, and that he had served with him abroad, and knew it to be all right. Some further conversation having taken place, the prosecutor was asked to give 401. for the award, and at length he agreed to give 301., 121. of which amount was to be taken in clothes, and the remuinder in money, but he refused to give any money unless they obtained a certificate from Bowch's commanding officer, and the next day a paper was produced by the defendant and Bowch pur porting to be the certificate of Robert Williams, "late Captain, Portuguese Service," to the effect that Bowch had served with him in Portugal, and that he was entitled to the amount mentioned in the award. The prosecutor, at the suggestion of a friend, required the certificate of a housekeeper to prove the 'identity of Bowch, and also that it should receive the sanction of a Magistrate before whom a declaration to-that effect should be mad e . Ac- cordingly, shortly afterwards, the defendant came with Bowch, and observing to the prosecutor that " he had done it nicely for him," produced a paper, certifying the man who accompanied him to be the person specified in the award, and the paper also purported to be signed by Mr. Maltby, the Magistrate. Upon this the prose cutor allowed the defendant and his companion to select clothes to the amount of nearly 121., and he handed them cash, making in all 201., but refused to give any more until proper notice of the sale of the claim had been given to the Commissioners who were investigating the claims. The next day, accordingly , the def endant w ith Bowch accomp an i e d a friend of the prosecutor's to the Commission-office, where it was ascertained that no such award in the name of Bowch had ever been made, but while the inquiry was going on, the defendant and his com panion left the place, and nothing was seen of the latter, but the defendant was taken into custody a day or two after wards. Witnesses attached to the Commission were called to prove that there was no claim made by any person of the name of Bowch upon the Portuguese Govern ment, but it appeared that a man of the name of Peter Click had made a claim, and the Commissioners had granted an award in his favour for the sum of 151. 14s. 4d., and the defendant, or a person of the same name, acted as his agent, and the award paper was placed in his hands, and it seemed that the sum had been altered from 151. 14s. 4(1. to 651. 14s. 4d., and the name of Peter Click had been erased by s ome chemical process, and that of William Bowch substituted for it. Mr. BA LL ANTINE too k several technical objections to the indictm en t, b ut t h ey w ere overruled by the Court. The Lear ne d C oun sel then addressed the Jury, and intimat e d t h at th e evidence did not support the charge imputed to the prisoner , a nd he subm itted that the evidence showed that he had b een the dupe of the other party, and that he had no intention to defraud the prosecutor. Witnesses were called, who gave the prisoner a good character for, honesty ; and one of them, in answer to a question from the Court, said that the prisoner verdict of Guilty. Judgment had served with th e army i n Portugal, and that a m an named Bowel; was i n t h e sa me regiment. The Raeonneri su mmed up, and the Jury returned a was respited. NEW COURT* The Petty Jury were sworn in in this Court about 12 o'clock, and soon afterwards adjourned. It was intimated t ) them by the Court that their labours wou.d be very light. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. John Goff, a young man, was placed at the bar, on the charge of robbing his employer, Mr. James Segress, the landlord of the Grapes public-house in Old Compton street. The prosecutor stated that the prisoner had been been in his service for a considerable time, and the utmost confidence was placed in his integrity. Latterly, however, circumstances transpired whieh induced witness to believe that some of the persons employed in his business were in the practice of robbing him daily. On Saturday night, on the house closing, he counted the number of cigars that remained in a box in the bar, and on Sunday morning missed 22 of them. The prisoner at the instant was about leaving the premises when wit ness stopped him and insisted on his being searched, and the 22 missing cigars were found in hie pockets, and also a quantity of loose tobacco. The cigars cost about 2d. each. The prisoner admitted his guilt, and begged, for the sake of his aged mother, that Mr. Segress would not pro - secutehim.—Mr. Segress intimated that he was inclined to be merciful. Mr. MALTBY said that robberies by servants were on the increase, and he should therefore commit the prisoner. WORSHIP-STREET. George Rose; a carman, was brought before Mr. Broughton, upon a charge. of having maltreated two horses. George Wilcock, an officer employed by the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, stated, that he was in the City-road, at eleven o'clock on that morning, when he saw the prisoner driving a van with two horses, which were *in so diseased and debilitated a state that they could scarcely crawl along. Both of the poor ani mals were literally living skeletons, and one of them had an open abscess on its back as large as a crown piece, and two bleeding wounds on each of its shbulders, caused apparently by the friction of the collar, which was press ing on them at the time. The prisoner admitted that one of the horses belonged to him, and said that he had borrowed the other. Hanley, the chief usher, said that the poor hacks were then at the outer door of the Court, and they attracted general notice, in consequence of their wretched scare crow appearance. The only place to which they ought to be driven was the knacker's yard. The officer, Wilcock, said that if the prisoner would Consent immediately to dispose of the horses, he would undertake, on the part of the Society, to pay him 10s. more for them than he would be able to get any where else. Mr. BROUGHTON said that it was a most liberal offer, and although he must order the prisoner to pay a fine of Ws., he should allow the payment to stand over for a fortnight, to give him an opportunity of acceding to the officer's proposal, and in, the event of his doing so the penalty would probably be remitted. CROYDON PETTY SESSIONS. At the meeting of Magistrates at the Town Hall, Croydon, on Saturday, Robert Jobson, an engine driver on the Croydon Railway, attended to answer a charge of having, with a hammer, inflicted such severe injury upon another driver belonging to the Company, that his life has been for some time despaired of. Mr. Russell attended on behalf of the defendant. The complainant, who still appeared to be suffering very much from the injury, and who gave his evidence with great difficulty, said that on the 10th inst., in consequence of learning that Jobson had removed his engine from the shed in which he had placed it, he spoke to him on the subject. Jobson told him he ha.l no business to put it there, and he replied that if he moved it again he would shake him ; to which Jobson answered that if he did he would get " sucked in." Jobson then went on to his engine, and called him a " useless old thing ;" and on his repeat ing the words, witness went up to him and collared him, and Jobson immediately struck him on the head with a hammer, and before he could recover himself he repeated the blow twice. He said, " Don't kill me with this hammer," and Jobson replied,. " - thee, I will," and was about to strike him again if the hammer had not been taken from him. After this they had a struggle together, and fell to the floor, and while they were upon the ground Jobson attempted to bite him on the cheek. When he got up he found that he was very bloody, and he went to a doctor, and had been under his care ever since the occurrence. When the complainant had concluded his statement, he appeared so exhausted that Mr. Russell said he would not take upon himself the responsibility of exciting him further by cross-examination, and lie should, therefore, not ask him a single question, and by - the direction of the Magistrate the complainant was immediately removed from the Court. Mr. W. Sutherland, the surgeon, deposed that he was called in to attend the complainant, whom he found in a state of collapse, and upon examination he discovered a wound in his head, and there was also a slight mark on the face, which might have been occasioned by a bite. The wound in itself was not dangerous, but the blows had occasioned concussion of the brain ; and for ten days the complainant was in a dangerous state, and he was still under I treatment for concussion of the brain. In answer to questions from the Bench, the surgeon said that the complainant was going on well at present, btit ho would not take upon himself to declare that he was out of danger, because it frequently happened, in cases of concussion, that the patient would appear to be going on well, and a sudden change, attended with a fatal result, might ultimately take place. Mr. RUSIzELL then addressed the Bench, and complained of the proceedings that had been taken to hurry on the present Inquiry before the unfortunate complainant was at all in a fit state to give evidence, and to bear the ex citement consequent upon a public investigation. He then went on to say that he would not attempt to deny that Jobson had most unjustifiably used a most dange rous weapon, but said lie should show the Bench that he only did so after he had been most grossly provoked and insulted by the complainant. Witnesses were then called, who proved that Archer had threatened on the previous night that he would have a quarrel with Jobson, and that he had put his fist in his face, and-col lared him before he struck him with the hammer. It was. also proved, that after the occurrence Archer said it was a rum job ; and that he admitted he was in the wrong, and asked Jobson to shake hands with him. The Ma gistrates, ultimately, after a brief consultation, said, that from what the surgeon had; stated, they did not feel themselveS justified in disposing of the case summarily, and they ordered him to enter into his own recognizances in 1001., and two sureties in 50/. each, to attend at the Sessions to answer any charge that might be preferred against him. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE, TATTERSALL'S—YESTERDAY. The attendance was swollen by the arrival of a few gentlemen from the country, and a fair proportion of business was transacted in the course of rather a long nfternoon. The Derby prices varied, in a few instances, from those reported last week ; for instance, Attila, after an outlay of nearly 1501., at 7 to 1, receded half a point, the offer to lay the increased odds proceeding from a quarter in which he had previously been backed to win a large stake on very favourable terms; Chatham was under " suspicion," and fell to 14 to 1, taken to a pony ; 221 to 1 to 301., and 12 to in fifties, were laid against Auckland, the subsequent offers averaging about ,22 to 1. The Joanna colt was backed at an improved quotation • but 1,000 to 15, taken t en or a d ozen ti mes , about William le Gros, had not the effect of improving his position in the betting. Lasso had rather a strong party at 50 to 1, and several scores and ponies were laid out on other outsiders, at prices averaging pretty nearly the same as last week. A few unimportant bets were laid ou the Oaks and Chester Cup. THE DERBY. 25 to 1 agst Mr. Gregory's two—taken 15 to 2 agst Col. Anson's Attila 14 to 1 agst Col. Peel's Chatham—taken 22 to 1 agst Lord Westminster's Auckland 37ir to 1 agst Lord Chesterfield's Joanna colt—taken 48 to 1 agst Lord Chesterfield's Dirce colt 50 to 1 agst Mr. Ramshay's Moss-Trooper—taken 50 to 1 agst Mr. Scott's Artful Dodger—taken 50 to 1 agst Mr. Gregory's Defier—taken 50 to 1 agst Mr. Pettit's Espartero—taken 50 to 1 agst Mr. Glenwood's Lasso—taken 1000 to 15 agst Mr. I. Day's Curator —taken. 1000 to 15 agst Mr.G. Clark's William le Gros —t freely THE OAKS. 9 to 1 agst Mr. Etwall's Passion —taken 18 and 21 to 1 in ponies, laid agst Mr. Scott's Syren THE CHESTER CUP. 10 to 1 agst Mr. Kirby's Lanercost—taken 15 to 1 agst Mr. Greville's Rory O'More—taken 18 to 1 agst Lord Chesterfield's Marshal Soult—taken INCENDIARY FIRE AT BORROVVASH.— We very much regret to state that a fire, the work of an in cendiary, br o ke o u t on th e p rem i ses o f Mr. William Meakin, of Borr owas h, D er by s hi re , on t h e evening of Thursday last, at the early hour of eight o'clock. It appears that at th a t h our M r . M ea ki n was in his stack yard, when he percei v ed a fi re i n th e b arn , and which, from the ascendancy it had gained, defied all efforts to extinguish it, notwithstanding the active exertions of the neighbourhood. The barn is within a few yards of the turnpike-road, and it was evident that whoever had been guilty of the diabolical act came from thence, as the footmarks were dittinctly visible in the snow from the highway to the building. The barn contained a quantity of wheat, barley, and a variety of farming im plements.worth probably 80/., all of which were entirely consumed, and, we regret to say, were uninsured. —Don caster Gazette. DEAFNESS.—Sound Magnifiers, and Invisible Operative Voice Conductors, to enable persons at an advanced age, and of old standing extreme deafness, to Join in general conversation, and to catch the sound of a distant low speaker at a publie assembly; they are the size of a very small gold seven shilling piece, and when In the cavity of the ears, they are not in the least perceptible nor more uncomfortable than having a small piece of fine wool in its place ; they are composed of a metal to collect sound, peculiar to the Messrs. S. and B. Solomons themselves ; and although they are so extremely smal. yet they enable those afflicted with extreme deafness, and those who are only slightly dull of hearing to hear in every respect equal to those of most acute hearing. Messrs. S. and 13. Solomons, 39, Albemarle.street, Piccadilly, opposite the York Hotel, and 76, King William-street, City. Newly-Invented Spectacles, immediately they are placed before imperfect vision, either by day or candlelight, that mist and dullness whjch appears before the eyes is at once removed, every object beer ming clear and distinct, so that the most aged defective sye.sight be. comes bright and brilliant, and is brought to its youthful, natural and original state. Those valuable inventions have gained the patronage of the Royal Family, and the unqua:ified approbation of above 400 of the principal members of the medical profession, and numerous individuals of high distinction, who have been greatly benefited by their use. To be had only at 39, Albemarle-street, Piccadilly, opposite the York Hotel, and 7fi, King William-strefe City.—No connexion with persons o f the same name. ----- SHEFFIELD.—W e have great pleasure in an nouncing, on authority, that an official communication has been received from Lord Wharneliffe, President of the Council, stating that the Privy Council have decided to advise her Majesty to grant a Charter of Incorporation to the berOugh of Shed 14—Sheileld Independent. THE SHAMROCK STEAMER. BRISTOL; 'SUNDAY. , ---I am happy to inform you that this vessel arrived here by this morning's tide, and has suffered very little damage; though it win be seen by Captain Hyde's statement that she rode out the whole of the tremendous hurricane from Thesday night to Thursday morning., Captain Hyde speaks in the highest terms of the Shamrock as a sea boat. She is one of the best steamers out of the port ; during the whole of the time 'she had not three inches of water in the hold, though the hatches: were open. The only damage done to the engines is the loosening of one of the cranks, which occurred when the vessel was about forty miles ;corn Dublin. The following is the statement:— "We left Dublin at eleven o'clock'on Tuesday morn ing; at eleven o'clock at night we sighted the Bishop's light, and the wind veered to S.S.W., and blew a heavy gale with thi c k ra i n . A t eight o'clock on Wednesday morning the wind shifted to W. and W. by N., and blew a perfect hurricane until one o'clock on Thursday morn ing, when it moderated. Finding she could not make head against the gale, I got up the storm-trysails, and, with head to northward, drifted the whole of that time. At four o'clock on Thursday morning, finding by my soundingS of about twenty-five to thirty-fi ve fathoms, and judging by the drift, I supposed I was near Aberyst with. As soon as daylight appeared I found myself about ten miles to the southward of Aberystwith, and at nine o'clock that morning I made into that port. Having made such temporary repairs as were necessary, and taken in coals and stores, she was ready to sail again on Friday evening, but on account of the dangerous na ture of the port for large-sized vessels, it was deemed prudent not to attempt to sail till Saturday morning. During the gale we lost 400 pigs, but none of our crew. The man at the helm, in consequence of the heavy sea striking her quarter, was dashed from the wheel, but fortunately seized hold of her sail, and saved himself. The spokes of the steering wheel were broken to pieces, but the vessel did not lose a shred of canvass, nor sustain any material injury." COURT OF SESSION.--On Wednesday only _ nine Judges were pres en t i n Court, a circumstance which, we believe, has,not occured on a regular sederunt day in the memory of any individual now connected with the legal profession. The four Judges absent from indispdsition were Lords Meadowbank, Moncreiff, Jef frey, and Cuninghame. Lord Moncreiff- is, however, expected to be out again to-day. Lord Jeffrey, who has not been in Court since July, is now in England for the benefit of his health, which all sincerely hope may be re-established, so as to enable him to perform his duties dui ing the'summer session. Lords Meadowbank and Cuninghame have been confined for some time,-but both will-ere long resume their seats.—Caledonian Mer cury. SACRED HARMONIC SOCIETY, EXETER HALL.—Handel's Oratorio of Solomon is announced for performance by this Society on Wednesday next. It is one of his best productions, and comprising as it does several of his matchless double chorusses, affords an ad mirable opportunity for 'the display of the unrivalled choral band of the Society. His Royal Highness the Duke of Sussex and the Duchess of Inverness entertained a distinguished circle to dinner on Sunday evening at Kensington Palace, including the leading members - of corps diplomatique. ABSENCE OF MIND.—A girl once blew her lover out of doors, and then kissed the candle.—Boston Post. • The answer to inquiries at Marlborough House is, " Her Majesty continues daily to im prove in health and spirits. The calls of the nobility and gentry have been very nume rous s i nce h er Maje Sty's return to town. PROTECTION OF THE DOCKYARDS FROM ,FIRE.—OFFICIAL INQUIRY BY THE LORDS OF THE AD MIRALTY.—In consequence of the destructive fire in Devonport Dockyard, a strict inquiry has been made into the means for preventing fire at the other dockyards in the kingdom. Mr. Braidwood, of the London Fire Establishment, has been engaged in the investigation, which has proved that the means of prevention are `generally very deficient. The inquiry has been devoted to the establishments at Woolwich, Chatham, Sheerness, and Portsmouth, but those at Plymouth and Pembroke have not yet been visited. The first inquiry uas addresied to Woolwich, subsequent to the fire which occurred there, and we understand that, although nearly twenty engines were in the dockyard, they were very clumsy and inefficient for the purpose. Mr. Braidwood's next visit was to Sheerness, where the place was found badly protected, as the only supply of water that could be obtained was from the docks and quay. The engines were in good condition, but from- this circumstance could not be made available on an emer gency for the protection of the dockyard as well as the town of Sheerness, and it was suggested by Mr. Braid wood that waterworks should be raised on an eminence in the neighbourhood in order to combat any fire which might take place. .The next place visited was Chatham, which it is well known is one of the most valuable and venerable dockyards. Here there_ was an extraordi nary want of protection, for although there was a steam-. -engine which it was said would extinguish any fire, it was ascertained that this could not be the case : the en gine was proved to possess no more power than an ordi nary engine, and, being at a remote part of the dock yard,- would be of little use. It was also - suggested that water should be obtained from an eminence, and several places on the line were pointed out as suitable to the, purpose. At Portsmouth the means o f protect i on were found to be very superior, and immediate assistance was near at hand both from the garrison and ships in the harbour. Two large iron floating fire engines, of the same power and magnitude as that of the fire brigade at Southwark-bridge have just been completed for some of the Hull dockyards, and - are now to be seen on the south side olßlackfriars-bridge. ,PATENT IRON-MASON.—A machine under -this name, for which a patent has just been taken out, is about to be erected in one of Mr. Neilson's quarries, at %%roodside, Glasgow. The stones go into the machine rough as they come from the quarrymen's pick, and come out polished ashlar on - the surface, and cut parallel and square on the sides, fully prepared for the builder, and this at an expense of not more than a fourth of work done by hand. The present machine is calculated to do the work of 250 men, reckoning only six h ours ' wor k out of every ten. The machine, with the expenses of experimenting and patents, has cost 1,0001., although new machines of the same size can now be made for one third of that sum, and smaller ones proportionally cheapen—Practical Mechanic and Engineers' Magazine. The rejoicings on account of , the christenin g of the Prince of Wales have been general—we may say universal—throughout . the country. In our own neigh bourhood, independently of- Kendal, where the event was celebrated well and- worthily by the public meeting Abe have recorded, celebrations have taken lace in Lan caster, where upwards of one hundred sheep • were slaughtered-and-distributed among the poor ; in Kirkby Lonsdale, Ulverston, Middleton, Penrith, Sedberg, Settle, Burton, and many other places, which we cannot even find room to enumerate.—Kendal Mercury. LONGEVITY.—On Saturday the remains of Mrs. Mary Painter, who had reached the advanced age of 94 years, were interred in Limehouse Churchyard. The funeral of this ancient dame caused a large assem blage of persons. The chief mourner on the occasion was Mr. Benjamin Blaby, usher of the Thames Police court. The sister of the deceased, Elizabeth died lizabetah few w mp w k e i e n k s who was upwards of 90 years of age, s ago, at Brackley, in Northamptonshire. The two sisters retained the full possession of their faculties until within a short period of their deaths, and were natives of War wickshire. Several other members of the same family have lived to the age of 80, 90, and 100 years ; and an ancestor of Blaby's reached the 'age of 105. SUICIDE OF JACOB SIMMS, ESQ., ONE OF THE MAGISTRATES OF ESSEX.Late on Thursday even • ing the inhabitants of Leytonstone, Essex, were fear fully alarmed by the announced suicide of Mr. J. Simms, who terminated his existence by cutting his throat. From what has transpired on the subject it appears that the deceased gentleman attended business as usual in the City on that day, at his counting-house, George yard, Lombard-street, and after attending 'Change to meet his connexions as a shipowner, ordered his chaise and drove home with his groom. He reached his resi dence about half-past five, to join, as was supposed, his dinner-table, and before seeing any of 'his relatives went to his dressing-room to prepare for that purpose. His footman, who attended him, saw nothing marked or al tered in his manner, and after having fulfilled the re quirements of his master, left him at the washhand-stand. It was not long, however, before he heard a heavy fall, and proceeding to his master's room, from whence th e soun d emanated,' discovered, to his great horror the unfortu nate gentleman lying on the floor bleeding profusely from a wound in his neck. lie could not at first dis cover the extent of injury his master had inflicted upon himself, as he did not wait to remove his cravat ; but hav ing aroused the household, proceeded with all haste to the nearest surgeon to procure medical assistance. This was speedily procured, but unfortunately it was without avail, for on their arrival Mr. Simms had just expired; This sad calamity has not only spread a - gloom over the neigh bourhood in which it occurred,- but also . in the City, where Mr. Simms was known as'a merchant of high cha racter and integrity, and as a Director of several public companies. A circumstance that is supposed to have preyed on his mind, was the elopement of his only daughter with one of his nephews, now said to be in India. A reconciliation had,' however, been long since effected through the intercession of the friends of the family. Mr. Simms was a fine, hearty, robust-looking man, and about 53 years of age. SHAWLS FOR THE QUEEN.—Monday last, an order was received by the Provost to send up some spe cimens of Paisley shawls, from which the Queen might make a selection, with a view to give encouragement to Paisley manufactures. We need scarcely saythat all pronip. titude was exercised to comply with her Majesty's wishes. A committee of selection was speedily formed, and a great variety ofshawlswere submitted to their inspection. There were about thirty shawls sent, varying in price from fifty to two hundred and fifty shilling's. The va l ue of the whole amounted to 1571. ss. 6d. They were 'Decked in cartoon boxes by Mr. .Kirkland, and sent off by mail the same evening, addres se d t o h er Majesty, at Windsor Castle. The goods sent were of a most beau . tiful description, and the style from each house being wholly differ , nt, a great variety was afforded for taste and choice. FLOGGING IN THE NAVY.—We have been in- formed on good authority that since the Vindictive left this port on Sunday week three seamen have received four dozen lashes each ; thus the flogging system still c nitinues to the disgrace of Old England.—Hampshire dependent. Letters from Vienna state that Count Colloredo, the Austrian Ambassador at the Court of Munich, is destined to replace at Londo❑ Prince Paul Esterhazy ; and this intelligence is confirmed by the Augsburg Gazette. MORNING UN - - THE MARKETS. — (Y EST E R DA Y ' ) CORN' EXCHANGE. o Last week's arrivals of Wheat were small,.but goo d Barley and Oats, and there was very little Corn fresh 11P 0 English Wheat sold very slowly at former tell s i l ot . ign rather more was clone. Barley very "u• k previous rates. Beans and Peas unvaried. Oats sla c is at former prices. Flour dull of sale, and ship P 2 ' rce rather tower. • 4 RRIVALS OF GRAIN IN LONDON DURING LASTO E ' ES. English . Wheat. Barley. Oa Ls. •OW ~ Irish ....... 4.553qr5. 10,173 qrs. 5,951 qrs. I 6,739153 c Foreign ......... 11.73.3 13,718 2 7 - 89, brig —.....— , Paresis ox BO Wheat,Red (old) White (old) Red 041) Ms. 551. Fine s , is. 635. Superfine 665. 675. - White (1841) 51s. 58s. Fine 60s. 6-21. --Superfine 'Os. 735. --Foreign free 565. 765. Ryt 3Bs. 40$. Barley 265. ags. - Grinding 3lls. - Malting 335. 365. Malt ... 565. 60$. --- Fine New 625. 645. Pease, Grey, New `los. 31s. - Maple New . Sl.. 335. - White .345. 365. Bolters 362. 38s. LA RD OP lIFIT, Beans, Small (new).......• (olfl 9•11•111... Tick (hew ...... - (old) .......... - Harrow inew). .... • old) ...... 381. Bran k 7 •111 Oats, k eed . ................. New" . - Poland" ............. • New ......... Potatoe .... .......... New ...... TEA MARKET, _ ; t The Market was fi r m, b u t th e d eman d was lim v -e e the trade waitin g f o r th e p u bli c sa l es . C o mmon x re Trade Congou Is. 103 d., cash. TALLOW MARKET. fir tli The operations in P. Y. Candle were f a ir and at, rates. 48s. 3d. for P. Y. Candle on the spot, and.4Bs. for delivery in the two next months. • od, the dlb the .e topes*, ult.° o. :re . the Metropolis is 1 Loaf. Good Bread may be had st &I. Walls End Hilda l9 U Walls End Northumberland 19 • 9 Walls End Perkins , 18 0 W. E. BraddylPsHettou 2./ U Walls End East Hetton 6 Walls End Hetton 23 0, .etoria Hartlepool Walls End Adelaide •• .... ' . Wall End Seymour Teo." 0 a Wal s Et, d 7 ecs ..... . ...... 18 Walls End West 'Tees... o “' 11 Holywall Trader ............ COUNTRY CORN AIARKETS. Wheat. Barley. Oats. Beans. j. to Ler rl Su e arter. Ato );, 3 Ato s. .1 i to a. 5. 46 ", Hexham 4d 72 36 38 •i 3 28 Morpeth 52 64 IR 36 22 1.0 40 4 2 "'" 1 Penrith . — 64 33 22 4 6 Sheffield — 65 31 21 .... 47 Winchester 54 68 27 30 20 26 40 42 45 , 1, Per Bushel. s.d. s.d. s.d. s. d. s . d . s.d. s.d. s.d u Carmarthen 7 0 (, 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 2 0 5 6 0 f lowbridge 7 6 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 3 ‘; Swansea 7tl 8 4 3 8 44 22 28 56 60: Per 8011. la Barnardcastl 14 0190 89 90 40 74 96 1 „- -„ I Durham 1, 6166 7 6 90 5 0 6000 -1 0 CI v 0 l o v Richmond l2O 18 610011 0 60 7 4100 1301 '' 0 lvi Stockton jl5 0 19 9 0 90 6 0 70 9 0 11 8; `' NEWCASTLE CORN EXCHANGE ed. Wh ll e " i Wheat, Northumberland........... ...... 541. 645......• 5 i 6 I Norfolk and Suff o lk 635. Vs...—. I NEWCASTLE CORN EXCHANGE- Red. White . i .... . . 545. 64a....... 535. 6 1_ 6 ifolk and Suffolk 63 5 . IL and Scotch.. • &)s. z: reign ........ 21.4755....... 66 ' lk and Suffolk .......... 3.3) Wheat, N - N oi Ber - For Rye, Norio; . I 4 Foreign 32s :kas. ...... - -4 ' .. .. 4 . Barley, Matting, Norfolk and Suffolk 3ls. 345 ....... .." 4 ' „ 1 Grinding and Feeding `6.. 28s. -"'' '-'___.' e ...._• Malt, Nor olk and Suffolk sls. 545....... --'• ... i . g Beans, • mall 38s. 4 '5....... --4' .., --,, Pease, White Gray 325. 345....... —'• --,,, Oats, Northumberland, Potatoe ... Feed....... -- Foreign 2Us. 221 ...... . ---• 1 Flour (per rack) 47s. 50s. ...... --s• _-s HULL CORN MARKET. Wheat, White (per Quarter) Red Foreign Barley, Malting GriEdir 60i. 621 !" fro. 5-s. '' 600. 64 , 601. 30s 3 s. ugs 294, lfls. 01' 225,, 18s 2 0 !• 32s 3' L 41 , P4s, 3L 3 Vm• eas 528. `. 6 .' —. 44 0 .4 : s 3 11 . • tiriEding Oats, British Foreign (in bond) Beans.-- Pease, Grey . .... Btue and White Linseed. Flour per sack Rapeseed (per H) quarters) SCOTCH MARKETS. os ti---(:$1, ..., Wheat. Barley. Oats. I Beans. 0 .--.—. ... ______. —___ ---__—........---•! 5 ,3 to ~‘ 'Aberdeen 60 to 70 28 to 30 15 to 20 . to— ,3 9- Berwick 3O 45 15 22 14 17 30 ~,36, • i 3 , Coldstream . 40 55 22 24 17 19 28 . ..„iii ; ~... y 3 Cupar (Fife' 46 65 26 31 18 22 22 IT ' g Dunbar,; . . 0 64 23 23 1$ 24 57 t_°, ...- / Elgin 7O 72 30 31 22 25 30 0 ,,' • ...... , Inverness Kelso Kirkaldy Perth..., , 60 67 30 40 25 33 41 4* u ntil'• blir Tho size of the measure v ar i es th ovg out the 14 ADDINGTON CORN MARKET. reitl e, d Wheat. Barley. O a t s . • Beal I os ,d First 67s Od 42. Od 26s Cid 38, Od Seco n d s6s 08 16. T d 23. 6d 52 s ad I ....4 Thirsll Od 14. Od I 22. 04 30. 0 4 Avvrage 2l. 17a 5,1 7.1201. , ,t , • GLASGOW conk 5 1/ ZIKET„ j, ',el Wheat, par 2401 b. s . d. s.d. Oats, per 2f4lb. *. i 0,01' 9 0 British, old 330 t 035 6 1. , .b 1 -- newo —e British ll 6 d I ) 0 Canada. free —o 0 Beans. I.er !2f 0 1 b 2 , 2 011 -, Irish Barley, par 3201 b. • Scottish ~., 6 10, English .................. 25 027 6 Pease i Scottish Scottish..., .. ........ :.. 2136 26 0 Oatmell,perl!Olh ; 0 Irish ... ................. 23 0 24 0 Flour per 2801 h. n , DALKEITH CORN MARKET. • oe o o j Wheat Baney. Oats. Team I 50' oi Fir5t......... 66. Ou 334 Od 25. 8.1 25; Od 651 ej Second Mk Od itis Od 22s 4d 3.3. Od sl• Third 1 • „ .1 ,4 POST -OFFICE OST-OFFICE ROBBERIES.—BRIsTO— , 0 0 4 29.—1 n con sequence o f t h e numerous robberies o f° 00 letters which have lately taken place in this e ..„,qs< Rath, representations were made to the Post'', dot" General, Loid Lowther, who immediately se n A ' c e Mr. John Ramsay, one of her Majesty's Post'°lool spectors, to make inquiries into the matter. 'Mr- 0 11 1131 { upon his arrival immediately put himself into e01r.. 0 0 . ,° cation with inspector Attwood, of the Clifton divi' t Jai police, and commenced an immediate and diligelocir, quiry. As Mr. R amsay i s gone to make alYos communication to Lord Lowther, the full ti" par t • the investigation have not as yet transpired ;. 11 , 11 ,4 known that two of the clerks—one of them I , 6 `;ct ° ,, responsible situation—have been suspended. - 111 "„, 1- 0,,, Attwood, by direction of Mr. Ramsay, made s i r; 11 0 ,," search of the suspected persons' houses. He ati s istl an official report, and take the opinion of the lavyn o rn of the Crown as to the further proceedings to be hip: TAILING TAKING PHYSIC.--" Please, sir, I don't bog Mr. Dosem takes his physic reg'lar," said a doct °r ,itil i ° to his employer. " Why so ?"" Cause he'll „. well so precious fast."—Ameriean Paper PLATE.—A. B. SAVORY and SO 4"." -I'-'''------ NS . . n ,' i t, Pth 'it il; tacturing Silversmiths, No. 14, Cornhill, London (Or: i Sis t / D i Rink of England).—The.best wrought Fiddle-Patte r ' a re a Spoons and Forks, at 7s. 2d. per ounce. The followi7thter weights recommended , but the articles may be had I° t l• heavier at the same price per ounce : X °; 0 oz. ad• 1 i g 4 12 Fiddle Pattern Silver Table Spoons 30 at 7 2." 7 ,; 0 12 ditto Dessert ditto 20 at 7 9." 1 0 P' 4 4 12 ditto ' Table Forks 30 at 7 2 ••• 1 ,", 8 12 ditto Dessert ditto 20 at 7 2 "' 3 4 0 2 ditto Gravy Spoons 10 at 79"'5 A ii 1 ditto Soup Ladle... 10 at 7 2 ••• 3 i n " 0 4 ditto Sauce ditto... 10 at 7 8 " 1 " 0 4 ditto 1 0 Salt Spoons(gilt strong) ,), . ; 1 ditto Fish Slice ... 3 1° 15 12 ditto Tea Spoons... 10 at . 7 8 ','' 0 - 1 14 1 ditto Pair Sugar Tongs (strong/ t oten' or N.B. A price current, stamped as a newspaper, ill ub t he P o r drawings, and containing every information relative !. ° 4 , at iooi„ • chase of silve r or Sh e ffi e ld p l ate, may be had on aPP''swer t o will be sent into the country, free of postage, in an paid letter. BIR7'HS. e s, sr , ' Al On the 24th ult., a t th e C ottage, Sandbaeh I Ch Francis J. F or d, o f a son. pile On the 27th u lt., at Maindee Monmouthshire, the tll Charles Proth ero , E sq., o f a daughter. Mi dd l e On the 26th ult., at H eston H all, Heston, 1 " „ lady of John R a y er H ogart h , E sq., of a daughter' Barri"- tot On the 28th ult., a t B ec k ett, the Viscoun t e ss tl, . e , of a son. . a w., On the 29th'ult., a t Cleveland-row, St. Jamee g.. Y lady of F ranc ii Hi r d, E sq., o f a daughter. in' DIED. $: t t Li.;* ' On the 26th ult., the Rev. Symons De Bret t , , of , risetor of heroughton, Lincolnshire Henry- aed 40. On 26th ult., Frances Barl o w Mr. Whitehead, Chatham-house, Ramsate, hel tau' • ' On the 26th ult., at K - h b g k eyns arn- an p age d 2k anit the, Rev. David Hopkins. liarYi reliet ivt On the 27th ult., at Avery's Cowfold, Sussex, ,—,.,-- i o eege of the Rev. H. Plimley, M. A., Chancellor of the . 1 ' • . Chichester, and Vicar of St. Lonard's, Shoreditch; ha w,s 4. On the 28th nit in T • john W l "' ~ Torrington-square, aged 86. heth 11417 On the 28th ult., at Stratford, Essex. Mrs. Elizs — tati stoO e g ner, widow of the late Mr. John Hemet', of Ley - Essex, aged 86. , joil.J . On the 28th ult., at Clapham-rise, Airs. Jane Ai r "' ' A widow of the late Captain Richard Jones, R.N. Samu el I*w. On the 28th ult., at Park-place, Islington , vr ip, second daughter, ner, Esq., of the Bank of England, aged 60. 'tof " On the 30th ult., in the Kent-road, Sophia, relic Ham Graves, E q ., late of Iron m o n g e r lane , *rd 86 ' of yo, l'i ta London : Printed and Published by MURDO ati iodSi • No. 112. Strand, at Th e Sue Office, No, lat the County of Illiddlosex, Tuesday, Februgq 1 1 ► )10' 58 ,431 ' 42' 461 51 ' tai 3•2 6 . 3 "' -.5 165. 21 : 211 ,254 r. 243.0 . 26' ' 2". Scotch ..... • 09 ,, Irish 15L Flour Town (per 6=10.... 9 , 515 -- Seconds. ... . ... ..... North Country.... D 6 ' Bran '76 SMITHFIELD. The supply of cattle was good; of Sheep, Calves, ans Pigs, moderate ; the trade was brisk, and all qu aliti t e s s met with a good sale at the present prices :--ua t Z,4, 2,680; Sheep, 20,600 ; Pigs, 220 ; C a l v es, 72. P', 4 - a, 3s. Gd. to 4s. Bd. ; Mutton, 4s. to 55.; Veal, ss. to 6s. Bb Pork, 4s. to ss. 6d. ' OIL MARKET. The market was firm, but the demand was lonseej. stocks are small, and lik e ly so t o con tinue. Li Oil 335. 6d. per cwt., and Pale Rape 525. per cwt. PRICE OF BREAD. if 4 d i • th- ........................ c--1;110, PRICES OF SEEDS. - Per Cwt. Kew English Red C10ver...76s 95s 1 St. Font ' Old I.itt,. Ditto - s -s -s Rye Gra55....... ...... ..."-.' .....s ''. .--s 5-- New Foreign Ditto.- -5 70s 92s Pace) , Grass i s' , Old Di t to Liao ' - s -s -s Linseed, for feeding , --a , 6 - Old Whit e Clover 56s 60s 705 Ditto, for sowing ...e.e.r 4 v., 9 . . 4 '. ti Ditto -s s-s Ditto, for crushing ....- -5 sag 0 `" New Tre oil ... ..-s 20s 40r Hem ..--s .11° p ..... .. ....... ........• • g(1 Old Ditto Fr, folium -s -.s -s English Carraway -s 50s 51s White Mustard ....'lds to is Foreign Ditto - s 46s 50rBrown Ditto 125 uu ' 7 , ' Coriander .... -s -s -slTares ......... 5l Cd s° 0 • Per Bushel , to 14 , t f il d PRICE OF TALLOW, SOAP, &c. per £l ll2lb Id 0 Town Tallow - £2 12 6 Melting Stuff.... ...... .. i 0 Yellow Russia • 210 0 Ditto Rough .... .... old 0 White.• so U 0 Graves ................. -••• 0 5 Soap Ditto OO 0 Good D regs . .... .............. PRICE OF RAW FAT, per stone of Sibs. .. 0. jib Price of Tallow (as stated by the T a ll ow Melters) .............. PitloE OF OIL. ' 1 o Rape Oil. brown, per ton. ...... ......... .......... ...lb o . Ditto, refined . 52 o Linseed Oil Se 13 7 . 10 Linced Oil Cake at th e Mill (p er 1000) I ° ' Rape take, per ton 4•••••••• COAL MARKET. d , Ships arrived since last market .d a y, At s. e Sell, Robson & Co. H art l e y 19 0 W alls E n d.Lambton ...•."'• l 0 ~ Carr's Hartley lO 6 W a i ts End Pemberton ....... ;1 s „ Holywell Main l9 :3 Walls End Russell's Heto" 0 'I anfleld Moor • 1 0 Walls End Stewart's: ......... '2 5 West Hartley ...• .. 2O 6 WallrEnd Car a dec ............ 0, West Wylans l6 A Walls End Kelloe .......*".. 0 1 0 I W ylam Walls End Hedlcy 2O ( Victi , Hartle, i 1 t"''''' ' : . .... . f