The Sun. — London, England, 1820-10-07 00:00:00

there . . L ~iult' - ~ I thio6 ;) Fie on ?-4 prte, 304, ut ecen k us tri!'" ..lf ; at NI a nteC e I s to bi'.• in9~~`~ , e el " n „ Ls tto, 3 that '66 asgiO rt rr : sent f`i ' c ircoo r• t of "'I o ,tl et: v" le I"i' t , stl)' W rt.ol' 20 ,c 5 -tier, 'tl its d th er l pu t I lioh t '‘‘•. COI ). abirUt i% ,roe ' ;;~ t e cotic'e, i t it ;°# siteC 64l ,. p ixTiv r r• , utl 14'‘. 1(1' 0 ' 55 . j, oftv : ;co, etr Airqu ;s r d e r , yr)? n aatiti ° 1. i/ [t~~. o , e e lee' V Fi„ 00~111 017 Q sb,`(e it t; e • ,o al • i• s`c leva" bi gi r e' 'le- he of 1" ct 11 ', r 1:7 5 Cb 3 ,be I le, I t st :id J°., :::,(':,:'; oach io; ~kv e rs " • !• 05 >,110051., t i,e 1 1 . ) ?: 511° If • i d Llte lV ' , to ~,t?' Wen of 11J , 0 „ r „re of. TO , ' I, Wh at . la ? . Ya • , W: " t h 4ll )"`"v - t ;bts o.sera or with a ballet. you remember li.,W th Que en was there ?—1 re it w*.il• I t' I'l I l e , I was tame at the tittle, and hat to • ai tfvet,„ e,nll4•lt• He r Mitj e sty must have remained there till 00 „or half-past twelv e , f),, e ,....,t1tt remember how -the Q:teen •went hack from the: th e • her ow n carriage in slate, at tended by myself and who. were 44541,e1y so employed. n ot ? e„ , :as g•trde n hear . or attached to tier house—was It uo l u l '}lnhe re IMtI W Of alterations, SUCh aS planting aryl trans. tt,, e ' d ts trees, or Other iniprovenients ?—The g arden was lut e b.. -HP, arid the•trees .a g ainst I ht wall, which had be- 1, , ,,,,,c t e i : .. 5prea,1 over the jiatlts; and in confintion. yar n ~ hut-nose had there been workmen employed in the 11,„ Sas, workmen the trees, and cleaning u t up Yt t 'T s ' b aW the m yourself did. - to jupiittetilenilier alt eitteitafnment g iven by her Majesty lee r .. 11' the Kinz-1!,,.e...edin,41y well. xtat „tto present at it ? —I Wai in waiting. what was the nature of that etitertni o ment, if you ,„o,•,.,Thre. wits a lar g e company.- It eta: expected that tansgiatrwold lie Seen on the'opeoin g of - a ceitaitt 1. .. 1 .,n 1 t1ig . a lon g time the door it : wiled, arid two the i)l.ld4esS of Cast eleicala and the Countess of 10,:•e'", with the Oahe appe,sied. , The Princes,' troPw,trodueed a the; ivy or lauel, with which the the host o f the filin g , am' the tiour theft dosed. It Inv(I about as'illuch tint- I have been taltn g of it, and "ger " as I)„ „, • • 1.1„, 1 ,• remember the dress of the Priii6i'ss "on Ibis (Kea' PN., ; ,;:". - ' do, ner;t•etl, well. It was laic the 411'1:Si of ilie.Ca tsai iSluseinn, •ir'iliat '4, t it l. y, l•itid of Venetian t:ress. of fact, was the dress of her Itoyal Highness of thetL yoit 'hare mentioned ?—.-ks nearly as a dress of viiold he made. Ladie s you !lace nienti•med dressed .in the . - -Svalethin g of the •a-ite lined; hut th e door was TjA sti sbort a time,. that they passed away almost Ithe • bld , . 14111 "i"5, that I. cannot speak with aecoracy. fiat attend the Pritteess wh en she witr t troni .‘a.pLes or t ; 1 quitted leer then. • w^s the eau .,,, a t h at ?—r n .c att .4e I was tired of tra ts.l.4,•' 11',tr j• o l.artieu a wi „ t ,„, Ru a e ,,Uld out ke e p up to her " sm., iv th e re ason had the _ g out frequently while ~ • ); see her Majestv, after that time ?—Yes ; several tier le s '•111 You first see her Nlajesty after she q uitted . .7.3•• • • sift tht win her return from the tour to Palestine I methei i i""ss., l l.!' d .-and - accompanied her to Rome, and then went i!;,iestv on that occasion apply to you to do so?— it, wei w titto g as a roatterof course. 1 do not lenient did von ren t irin svaitiog,?—As l'o ug as she re thi,l i 1 r'' '' Y,,l,"'rsifi ts of distinction visit her Itityi.kl Hi g hness at W4.„ L ' • *---I'..g ; severd. . I pi esent v il them myself. `"1 i n the foll;wing year in'attendance o t her M- I-1„, ‘.).'" attendance .. .on h e r Rosa! Hi g hoess when 'lei 10, Frescati, aud Villa i3rantli, in the same A .4.4 ("to' h i: did you remain in attendance at that time ? 't It.. "s• Rat her untie than less. Ras ,• .^ttime do v „,, ~,,,,•t ro w e whether her Royal • I'v v' 'k ' I t - of distinctimi 4.1'4-11t i: , :.l:l;(4 . ;[...ll 'i t ' lt i. lllle in .1.1tt41441i411Ce t,,,4111 ‘ll,e, , r 'the three months ?—'l he I'llaCtsS wa s t,., to tri vet gave me permission to to Naples, on ac cl« • t ,- •- • th e Count 1 114, 're Mose. persons ?—Amongst lien y as . - ' l ll l , ia r - 1 1 :,;: . sliti was announced with a liinster of th.t., House l'irit,.'.vlll-it year was ft • t , —lt was just after her /loyal 'High -1')(2 fro m he'r A ltin.r vos had 411 idea of g oin g 4 alti tj t , - .,,'"''• lav e e • t v "vas invited with ht . '' , and ts. l - they, t ., ~ • •).". 'f' ••• in I t i n t th e whole party Prin. to. S.ixe ong, , e '• • Princess of Lichtenstein was also to liav ik " , 11 1 • - • Y"u v:Ver hii;rt in attendance on her Majesty since lately ?—Yes, tor a few eays, whun she passed • 'untie as Qi - teert, the last linie. s vitiplovrd at that time to apply fo r a passport ? r th a bee n du n e befote by :soothe p e , '4lts,,f;"n sae it I saw the older for post. hoists, sign ed r 7) the. Secret - 1r • of State. t bOle ,'"'n see hull it ;—Nti, but I saw it made out., and Tt, i i - , t `'''"l it is, he , ; : 'nature front several %\ll4l Sal, it. t,Ll'4".•port 1 helierr, cue, were tibli.red to give np at tile ' • to it I' ist toaster. Ti e 4 ,vai dye It WaS to .4e g uilt klit ia. • ‘'T.TOII.NLY-GLNEIIAL objected to.theex a -I'st tl°ll ( '-' 1 the witness on this subject. :in -the ".,", on a point of law, lie objected to ` v - °lll --C"' a 'Witness to a document which, if it n 1 0 44 `)`-' evidence at 411 must be given in ; and, t rQr 11t- 'xt place ; . ould not see how an order t t) . .tr,,, sl horses : 4 4. 4 1) at Itome could be material Present procedings• j r ,1 Elt: N MAN contended that the objection .of tilt l a dled Friend was merely- technical, and k '4 l . u ' l ' w as also compl e tely contrary to the strict- 11 '4 e ' s of the t e Courts o(Justic.e. They had a \ '‘tti ° o ffer secondary evidence of the order, Aare ' l l this instance was to operate as a, pass t4 it " s si uce it was placed .beyond their pow'er by -I)4 l)a r ag _, e of a foreign country. lie was fully Pr 11 to 0z e „,. 1 . spew - that it was material to then` l bp gSs httt it might be expedient notto-'do vans ' e 'ent, if with that. courtesy W filch was Y sh e Tba tt ,•,. -` . v ll - to a Counsel, when he asserted A4 E.I - -la hty of a docurnent they should not „. A 7 ‘elY require . the explanation he could t ,, cl their Lordships silence he ,considerc , 'coiv '",,,Wlslied hint to shew that it was material, 4 rt ' th - 'would state then, that in this pass 'tat -e ‘ - ttleert was treat:' by the Secretary, of (q - ot t th Isalvi) not as Queen of *England, but 4 : 11 ''arid thice.s‘s Caroline of Brunswitzk or ef • did not know which, so that the 1 ) ‘kl is • •, t)f 1.1 61 ' state , without waiting I'M- the result inn • quiry--without waiting • for an Act of 4 ; 4l nent d to degrade her, had proceeded to .1)„t matt 4 e I , by .his -own lre (Nr. ''°old also undertake to say, t h at °lids ,'"Veri e a t;' t- `° ll e through the itillnence of the ILI -"nister th ere a t that time ; and h e . itdual tinc„-te,t h ahle further to shew, that that . as r eceived his instructions -from those 'a f who had been-most forward in brintr.- 4 1 t , ° "ward -ce these proceedings, - in getting evt tltitac,l,4l in corrupting .those witnesses . who, ."' t ) he now say st oo d perjured ta tie their I t.ild_ :!tl: t Jle, therefore, and, the Paper' was not 'ontnaterial,. that, 41.etieele ci ccurnstances of the. case, secondary W ° 1 1 1 , , - 4 gl i 't to be received. • . ltr ad rntsci •Alts f . , - )Ilo‘vod on. the. same ti . tne. I ltat of a document war- one thing, a l l lily anOtEtr. TiCIQ - • irrS(Miglif. rat relish ri gr°1111(1 for obiection. The . second - might (.441 e . oe bv thu Court in the 'They , that the : : document was lOthred in a , t ..1 til t" t where their Lordships' - co 'process 1, 1 Ir/inland 41 production. I. A .trro . obj e ,„: /I NEY-Gr;;TIAL complained .. that otis were Mad e ot i.p o i t itS dflaw, his • 'ita- i "ends opposite took the Opportunity . ;appeals cliche th e y oug ht not to do. (." ng•a ' 'te . Ltll g°d in invectiyes . against int-titAduals ut , c (1410 ottoecte.l ' not .with the qUeStlOll, and that s ot,; r . ' 3 ibly affect the objeciions started. ,` l / 4 11 , that no rule was - more clearly 41.7 f, (4 than the rule that secontlar9' evi ' not be admitted u n til th e a b sence oh , • evidence had been Previously-explain ed. In the present Case the befit evidence Was' clearly the document itself, and that alone - could be received in evidence, or,,at all events, no . verbal evidence of its contents could be received until it had •been proved that due di ligence had been used to procure the original document. 7 These Observations. he humb?y sub mitted as to the inadmissibility of this species of evidence, for there was a stronger objection, which would go t 6 the admissibility of the ci camera itself,.even if it ,were now at their Lord ships' Bar. That objection would be as to the relevancy of the document as applied to the question now unnier trial. The question now under trial was simply as to the conduct of her 'Ma jesty in the year 1815 ; and. how could an order for post-horses or a passport, even if either, or both of those documents were before the House,. how could they have any possible bearing Upon the present question ? A..few words should be offered respecting an observation which had been thrown out, that this was a technical objection. He should, in answer to this 'Observation,- only remark, that his present duty had.4feen cast.upon him by that House. In the performance of that duty it became him to offer legal evidence on the one side, and to see that nothing, but legal evi dence was received from the other. That duty he should perform to the best of his ability, and he was not to lie ,deterred by 'reproach or -invec tive from the discharge of it. .. 'The Long CHANCELLOR said,, that if the in strument • existed, thy could bring no evidence as to its contents, unless it could be proved that I it bad been. lost, or applied for and could not be obtained. • He proposed" to - put the following question to the Judges :--Whether, in the Courts below, evidence could be given as to the contents of a passport left in a foreign country, without .some proof that application had been made for it without effect ? With respect to the expres sion _about the witnesses,, he thought it due from the House to afford every' possible protection to those who gave evidence at their Bar ; and he did not think the expression " perjured witness" could be applied to any person until the whole proceedings in the case had been closed., The Marqui of LANSDOWN said, the passport had been left with the postmaster, "as his autho rity for granting• post-horses ; and he had no other motive for keeping the passport, than to . gisie satisfaction to the Court as to the propriety of his conduct in granting post-horses ; and it was not to be expected that the document should be now in existence. The Earl of LAUDERDALE said, that according to regular usage, the passport must be in exist ence, as care was taken by proper persons on the Continent to preserve all the passports which were issued. He wished proof 'as' 'to whether there had been really a passport.' The. Marquis of LANSDOWN and Lord ELLEN noltooGn said a few words. Lord ERSKINE said it was not a question about the passport, but wi'ether this Cardinal Gonsalvi had treated the 'Queen with proper respect : as to the, passport itself, it could be hardly consi dered as a paper which might be produced if it had been applied for, as it was very doubtful, indeed, whether it was really in existence. The LORD CIiANCELLOR exp/ained. The Earl of LivERPOOr..—As -to the relevancy of the evidence,,he would ask how-could it bear upon: the present case, unless it could be applied to the Government of this country ? The Marquis of LANsbowN-eonceived that it might ,be vary,material for her Majesty's Counsel - to chew that a conspiracy. had existed abroad against her Majesty; to induce this Government (without its being privy to the: conspiracy) to brimy forward the present charges. The Counsel at the Ear believing that he could - prove such a conspiracy to have existed, the House would be guilty of a gross act of injustice if they did not suffer the eN.amination to. proceed. It appeared to be the object of the 'Learned Counsel to con nect the conduct of the Pope's Secretary tow;ards the Queen, with an application made to him on the subject by the Hanoverian Minister. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that unless ap, plication could be proved to have been made for the passport, the contents of it could not be ad mitted as evidence. The question was then abandoned, and the examination► was resumed. Examination continued. Q: When you low the Quern at'Rome, en the second oc- CaSilPfl, you also see liergn4 D i ?—A. !! , :t.veral times. AS Well in her presence, as When sle IV not there several nines '--Yes, I wish to ask whether or not in the demeanour of the Queen to-Bergami. or Bergami to the Queen, you saw airy thing in decorous or improper least. In what. manner did Bergaini conduct himself towards the Queen, on the occasions when you saw them together ? With the most marked attention, generally speaking, , he did every thio;: that he sitiZtit to do without the appearance of any thine :i.ingnlar or particular. Was the Countess oldi in attendance on the Queen at Rome the last time?-1 believe not the last tune, Die-nu see her after ?—Twice. What length of time was the Countess in attendance on the Queen ?—She was three months at the Villa Btandi. 1-i:ld you an oppottonity of judging of the manners of the Countess of Oldi ?—Yei; 1 had repeated opportunities, I ge nerally sat neat her at table., I :isle you whether the . Countess of Oldi is a person of IoW and eu t Lfa e manners ?—terrainly not. • What' is the appearance and demeanour of the Countess ? A vet y respectable good-looking modest Lady. On any occa s ion when Brigand waited, and the Queen was no , present, what was his demeanour toward) you ? I should say, on all occasions, lather more respectful than was necessary. You hare been some time in Italy ? went alit oad. I want to know whether , according to the habits of that eoiintev, ii is it usual CirCUMat 3ll ce fist Men servants tl) g!, into the.brrl roimrs. while Ladies are in bed ?—1 b e li eve it is trot uncommon : I think it is ;Astral. , you known•yourwlf, of your own knowledge, ofßer gala dining :it the Queen's tah!e ?—Certainly Once sir More than once?—l cannot remembet More than once at this montent, I mean at her I bare seers 'him at other t:11)1(.4. You have been in the hahit of Seeing; Moorish dance's in the Eastern Countries?—Not only in Use East, but Spain. Will yam describe generally that dance ?—I cannot dance. -Ever since the Que6n The LORD CHANCELL.OII.—Sir W. Gen, has the goat. TI r. itiAN:s. 7 -Con you give a de , eription verbal) of the manner in which these dances are condnc:ed ?—I believe every body in Lovelon has seen the Spanish .Th , /ero at Hit , Theatre; it is very much like that. At the first. Jail of t h e exhibition, several performers run up together.; ‘mnetimes in an nt11050;14 manner. The something is dune in almost all parts of the South of Europe. beery body sees it without Quilting a remark. I believ e it is cmotoon in China. •Whilst }'oh welA at Naples in attendance upon the Q-uten„ were On'te inhity %'"iittir,l?----All the Neapolitan Nuliilay there; and all the English Cau you tell whether the English Nobility Of which yoti have hero speaking' were persons who .had heed presented at. Cone! ?—Presented to the Prnicess. Every one of them was . in the habit of dining with - her Royal Highness and attending her parties, • State the name of :,lay one -of the visitors ?---The Marquess of Sligo, Lord and Lady Oxrord, Lord and Lady Holland, Lord and Lady Linn tail, Lady E. Forbes, and many Othets- , - every body was there. Were you there at the time Lord Exmouth was ?—I du not know any thing of Lord Eimoutti. When you was at Rome, did you 'know whet her Bergatni was received in the familiesdf the Roman Nobility e—That I don't know ; I don't believe that he ever walked out. Gro - ss-exqtn bred by Mr. PAu E. Q. Uow long were you at Itoine in attendance upon her Highness after the long voyage ?—ii. Tee whole tithe She was there. 11.,w ririuy days ?—I 'think a few days. . • After the expiration Of those few days, you quitted Naples? —Yes. You continued with her Royal highness 'when s h e first cater to Naples, and firmed a ~ art of her suite.-1 We re you wills her when she arrived ?.--1 was. What time of the day was it; In the evening—late in the evening ?—No, about sun-set. Yu g 5 say there was a garden behind ber house ?--There WAS. Did you ever see the Princess walktng in that garden ?-- Yes. Did you ever see the Princess walk in the garden at Villa d'E.te ?—I did one morning. Was Liergami there at the time ?-1-Ie was. IVere they walking on the terrace ?—They were. flow near was Bergami to the Princess ?—As near as I am to you (Sir W. Gehl was ahoot four yar4ls . from Mr. Parke.) Was he waihimt at the same time ?—Yes: Haw long did yua see them walking t4igether ?—Hall a minute.. %Where was you ?—At aoother wine of the house. Did . sou see Amy body else ?—Notnty but a workman. Was you in waititie in tie house of the Queen?—! was. Was yoo there the -whote.time-?—Yes. Did you see.lieigami often at thartioie ; where was he ? llr attendiog her Royal Highness, and waiting un company. 1/id you see her Rvyal Highness in a Turkish dress ?-4 r es. When you saw her did.; you see others dressed?—There were a gieat many, Was she by herself at the time you saw her in the Turkish dress, or with a troop of Turks ?-1 cannot recollect whether she was alone. . . Did you attend her Royal Highness up stairs when she came for her dress ?—I was with her up stairs in the course . of t he evening,. Did you accompany her down when she was in character ? —1 have come down stairs with her in character. Did you recollect what character she was in at that time? —I really do not. Lord EII.KINE—Did you ever observe any impropriety in the conduct of her Royal Highness and Bergami towards each other ?—No, never, • You are a man of the world, Sir William Gell : you have lived adeal in it, and I wish to ask you Ibis question posing it had been true that there was a criminal connexion between the. Princess of Wales and Bergatni, and -Bergmui had acquired dominion over I . he mind and body of that illustrious Person, do you think it possible that you should not have. no ticed it ?' The Sot.icirml l GENEßALOjectefl to the question. Lord ERSKINE said, it occurred to I,lw that it was a ques tion which might he put in a Court of Law, but if there was any objection he would not press it. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said, a sense,of ditty com pelled him to object to the question; he was only desirous of doing his duty. Lord ERSKINE.—As the Solicitor-General seems to wish that the question should not he put, I will give him all the benefit he can derive from his Objection, and withdraw it. Lord ELLENBOROUGH.-1/id you et'er observe in the manners of the Princess of Wales.ang Bergami any thing to induce you to think there was an adulterous intercourse be tween them I—l nerti did. ' iVas there any thing in the manners of Dergami which made it disagreeable to you as a Gentleman to share with him the chilies of service?—On the contrary; lie was remit, hably modest and unassuming; be was very respectful, and paid great attentitht to me : indeed, he would condescend to light toe doWn stairs with candtto: when I left, would have suf fered hint; hut I told hint in his sitnation l could not suffer it. Did you find On the part of Bergami the conduct of a gen ?—Perfectly so to me. Did he take more thmi his fair share of. the duty ?—He did Did . you observe any thing in the conduct of Bergansi more than in a u;nal,attemiant ?—Nothing, but that he was more attentire•. Lord DARNLEY—Do you. know, Sir W. Gell, having travelled so 111 Clt as you bare Of Naples and Rome, whether the orders for post•horses ar the pest-office at Rome are pre .served ?—I think not, for when they ate done with they are of no service. _ Is not an order for pmt-horses an equivalent for a pass port ?—Yes, it is. Can you take upon .yourself to. say if an order of the post office , to uld he forthcoming ?—l.,cannot take upon myself to say; but I think not frow.what 1 know of the ROmati Govern.. went. • I wish to know the nature of the order for post horses given to her Nlajesty ? A PEER—It is an qnestion. Lott! DARNLEY—I think it my ditty to put the qnestion. The Earl.of LIVERPOOL—Was !+,ir William Ciell aware whether Berg,aini was or was not a married man ?—I believe he is a married man, hut I do not know it.' The LOltD .CHANCELLOR.—Does Sir William Gell mean to sayit hat was his belief whets Bergami was with bins ?—Yes. Lord LIVERPOOL—You have seen the child, Victorine, Did you nut know she was called Berganit's child?—She was called the daughter of Brrgami, but I, don't know that she wag his daughter. . PEER ---On the return of the ,Princess from the , Opera at Naples, to her own house in . the course of the night, do you know whether she returned t'd her own chamber, or where she went ?—Her Royal Highness returned to,her own cham ber; - I waC3.at the door ; and Vbelieve her Royal Highness went to tied. Lord BATHURST.---Non say von 'saw the Princess and - Bergatni walking , together on the terrace at Naples ; was that soon after her arrival at Naples ?—I really cannot say to a week.; I am not. positit;e. Lord INNISKILLING.—What was the time of night when the. Queen returned front the Opera, and you left her at the . chatuher-door *one o'clock in the morning. You have described the Queen-as being dressed in a lobe resembiing the dress of a•Grecian ;, I wish to know whether the robe could be put over any dress she had on that night ? It. was put over a dress her Royal Highness had u4derueath, and the robe was open. It came up to neck; it'was very short, and had no' train. . By Lord LAUDERDALE. Did rou attend tier 11. flat Iliziinesfk the Princess of .Wales at the Villa Brandi and to 11111)1.01i ?,—Nes. In what year was that ?—ln 1877. Can you,state i:),,phat months uf.the year 1917 ?—Yes, I can. In .tune, July, and August. Do you remember whether Louis I3ergami was at the littia Brandi ?.:—Cerrainly he was there some part of the time. Do you rememberif tiny other persons of BerOmi's• family were at the Villa Brandi or Bopinelli ?—The Countess of. Oldi, the sister of Bergami,'was there. Was there any other person of that family there ?—Realty I cannot at this motrient recollect. t Faustina there ?—I newer. Was there ati.he! sister mtmeit saw her. Never to. know her either as Faustina or the sister of ' Berganti. . . . . DA Louis Beraatni ever (line at the same table with the Princess at, the Mike Brandi ?- - Ycs, soMetisoes at the same . table: Did you ever see the mother of Pergami ?—Never, that I know of. you ever recollect seeing any other relation Bergami. besides LouiS liergailii, and nit. C:ouotess of dldi ?—I have seen tio tither. . • ... _ . By Lord. ROsEliEttllY. Q. 'I wobld ask sir W. Gell; whether tht short dress Whlcii , her. Royal Highness w o re rip at the neck, ...milder that ~f o? Grecian female, was ttre same in which sic hail aPpent ed in t h e first ett!,ifacter ?—I liti+ove it was. . I was only, in_ the pas,a,re w a iting for her p.uyal Hitt:mess. The second dress ,I c e truce must 4Thve Lien' put over the short , ri t ,, s , h i cit I hav e ile, , ev,hed. Then y'ots are centain that the first dress ste..wore, -was that over winch the Grecian dress was put .?—it co , ,m be no othrt• • When 101 l have seen .Bergami dine , at the table 1) of ~Trir_ cess, what part of the table did he sit ?—On th e l e f t h a nd o f her Majesty. . . . . Did he sit , next to her Maj:sty ?—Sometiti es next to her, RCA sometimes distant. And whvre, si r winih n i G i lt, did von sit'; 'tin the oriposite s id e ?-IVhen there was no cotalpaon, on the right hand of the Quceui. . When. there was no& company present; did 13elianti con tinue to occupy the place next th *leen ?7 ,-- 4os!'aS it hap pened ; sometimes yes, and sometimes no, according to the rank of the visitors. Lord NI AN (pink Sic .Witham Cell has stated that Louis Berizaini h is dined at the table of the pyincess whets Sir GeII was lirei;ent ?—(Cries of " No,'no !)—I beg par- Awl if I am wrong,—.{hear,. hear !)---bot I so understood the witness. I-low otter; has that occurrtd ?—Several I wish to ask what situation Louis Bergami held in the ser vice of the Princess at that time ?—I-le was her ituytaitigh ness's equerry. . . Where did Louis Ileri , ami sit when he was so dining at the table of tit , : Princess ?— Generally at the other cad of the table. C ENCI By the SOLICITOR 7 tAL through the LORD , o t frog' d-,(1 the e , ?--• he „ ta r I. 4, )_—SOM 6 ' d pule' rd but ,h ¢ ~► lOU a ' a , oce rr i t°lll i ntice be r°°l9 ,ni site( CHANCELLOR. When her Royal Highness appealed in thr,'Turhish dress at the. Bail, did she wear trowsers ?—,She.did wear trowsel s ; and I wish to explain'to your Lordships what lilt's' are. They are such as are commonly worn in the East. 't hey are yery much like a petticoat.. They are a sort of petticoat sewed be= tween the legs at the hottomot -the,shirts. Lord BILOWNLOW. Q. I Wish to know whether the Leafier on which Bergami and the Queen were seen, could be seen by the persons•ot the surrounding inntses, as well as front the house itself ?.t-A. it could be seen 'froth erery house in the neighbourhood. l•woulrfask Whether or not, at the ball at Naples, on those occasions when the Princess went to, change her dress, she had any attendants to assist her say the• tenth, I believe site had a great Walther of attendants. The dourS were often. open, and they continued going in and out. Do yiin ktiow whether Bergarni attended her Royal high ness ?—f do slot 'know. Lord FALMOLITH.—ir William Gen has stated that he saw Berganti and the Princess -walking to;;rtbe► on the ter race, adjacent to the residence at Naples; were they waihing arm in at ? Mr. BROUGHAM.—My Lords, it is not in the minutes that the witness said he saw them together; he &shoed) , Statett, that they were ;it a certain distance from each other, and pointed the distance out to their Lordships. (The distance was about .four vards.) Lord FALMOUTH,L-If I misunderstand the evidence, I of course withdraw the fluestiu9. Lord LALTDERDALE.—WIttn at Ropioef with 'her Royal Highness, have you any recollection of Bergami being ill at any time ?=No; t have not. You were not arthipinelli all the time that the Princess of Wales remained there ?—No, I was nut. . • It was now four o'clock, and the House adjourned. PROCEEDINGS OF THIS DAY. . . This morning the LORD CHANCELLOR entered the House twenty minutes before ten, after which prayers .were read by the Bishop of Bras Tor., when the usual call was proceeded with. Excuses were made for his Royal Higli ness the Duke of York, who still continues ill, and also for Earl Fitzwilliarn and "Lord Pon sonby. The _Learned Judges, at ten mintites, past ten, entered the House. .The Marquis of LANsaowN rose, sand—ob served, that, understanding that the Correspond ence between M. Marrietti and his son was trans lated, in pursuance of the order of the Ji °use, he should move, before their Lordships proceeded to business, that the Interpreter be called in. The Interpreter was immediately called to the Bar, when the translations of the letters were delivered in. The. LORD CHANCELLOR, addressing the Lti terpreter.—ls the translation now delivered in to their Lordships a faithful one ? Interpreter.—My Lord ; to the best of .my knowledge it is. WITNESSES FOR HER MAJESTY. At 20 minutes past ten the Counsel Were. cal.t. ed in. The Earl of LivEupooL then suggested, if Lady Charlotte Lindsay were in ',..tendance, it might perhaps save her trouble if their Lordihips should consent that she be now called in. Mr. BRoUGHAM.—My Lords, Lady Charlotte Lindsay.is not i❑ attendance. WILLI A 31 C INGTON was .thCa ca lled, in and sz - L7orn, as a witnessfor tik Queen. Examined by 31r.1)esmet.N.—LI. In what situation of lire arc you ?—A.• I ant Sir W. Gell's valet. How long have you lived in that situation ?—Nine yeas. What were you before that ?—lt was the first place I Gad.. What were you before you hao that place was in the Navy. •'• •• • • • In what capacity were you ?—At; a Nlidshipnran. Did you attend Sir ,W_Gell in. the tatter end of ISl4?—Yes. • Did yon. lire. in the house of the Princess Do you remember , Bergan►i's corning to the. Princess% sec.- , —I do. • vice'? In what situation was be ?—A Courier. ' Did hia coining into the service of the Princess excite arty, iealousy at the time among ; her servants, or after that•?—j. know of none. Do you remember the first night you artived.at Navies ? • Po you recollect where Bergami slept that night,?—Yer . ; he slept. in . a small room over. the Stewarci:s,- that is, Sicak4's. DUI Bercami sleep iu•t.he sarns room or, second uighL —No. Why .was the room changed ?—Because it was. so low tbot be c•oultl out- stand up fight in it. ,Flow far was Bergattn's ruiprn removed frow that of tee Princess ?—About 60,feet. Was there any room or rooms bitween the Princess's and Bergami's ?--Theie were three roonts,.and also a passage. Who .occupied the three rooais?—William Austin the first, Mr.siirlierostysnus in the second, and Dr. Holland-in the third. Did these rooms intervene between the Princess's and Pier ?—Yes. Did auy passage open on the thtee rooms ?—lt did.. .1... Do yon remember t!eing at a masked ball given by the Pri.47 cess <<t 'Naples ?--Yes; Do yon remember the dresses of the servants on that occa , sion I—l 111,1 not sce t hem. Did you wait upon that' occasion ?-1 Jid. Did you travel with the Princess On her journey to Naplv4?, i -. .Do you remember William Austin there ?—I (to. Do you teutember where Austin usually .slept before ynar arriralatNaples?—fte slept by himself when their was teem for bun,• and when there was not, he slept to the: Princess's roam. . . Do you realenibena person of the name of M4oeci?- 7 —l do•. Do you tonnetobt r biic mentioning the name of Lixtun tetla to you,?- 7 1 ito. • • Wbat act . lurar Majocci say of Baron Onlßteda. The A'T'TORNEY GENERAL here objected to this ques tion; ne :feniarlictl, that no question had ever been pat to Majocci with regard to the Baron Onptvda, and nothii4," that passed in conversation; as bettit'en the witness and Ma-"' joeci, could be received in contradiction 'of bit evidence. TheSOLICUOR-GF.NERAL spdke shortly on the satneside;‘ he con s ceivd that his Learned Friends I , rl the opposite si t i c o ught to point out wbat part oE.Majocvi's evidence it was pro-