The Sun. — London, England, 1820-07-11 00:00:00

thg ity of alidy, Anat I" etrthe of this ig old be itylor r etort ores of '3,0001i was; y e ar 1 their highly d, atici I t thus TitiS taie, if arruedr ,blic. - nu ab.• he coo e cdold d to be ecord et bari.,,ed oil the f. 1 1 ' - cd Le.g kiottSc • t o Cup" • ,j, 3 Lv3l it Inaittc. o iu Bold tswil 4 t woul4 the ill?' lieu he ,) (10 -0. alo, "" beharg o ted 01" s one olsat bbat itii y be i - w - tr e st core of ►l'o fur the `tie UL' of Mr° ins pre' it • i; bis ,fated ime %‘ 34 leprice3 be di)stie urtiett 4 the 13;0 C ~ryu i w • , of wo e ou 14° but Only trlCrenaTl.S 2,......;ingan had contributed . ' ' '''• :' - ', "ous artists, who had 1 . long resided in this cuuntrY, and,. s . .... to enrich' c lans if• by, theirindustry and' kilt P h t a l d r i rt 4 l e was of a mord peculiar n s a s tu n r n e, ai r t 1 :1 11 reference to the painful 'di-cu i :touse Was involved ; oil whichi,_, subject he bad e ll c N t vhich the kept hitherto a - profOand_i 'hence, :to the Judicial -duties whiol.be called ' e; from a'regard he might course ; must be 114- Upon to perform. - 4e) - °I . - ,110..r.iieeti, -and dar n to allude. to the‘case oil ..---4 . ti.iie clause went to prevent . its beino - , supposed !that any party could have an undue inquenCe over' legal. rdceedings: .The e ,witudsses .in the ,cAlaiise went td exempt from the operation of the "" - b 6 , Aat all witnesses-for or. against the' a ll , i ,a ll ni . o st f Pains and Penalties that had been brought n w•le %lee n i n another - House of parliament. In to have the 4441 a -case, "ministers ought Nwer to send the xvitnesses ‘ °veil their - own witnesses; ill . that event, they , out n o ° f t the Country, of .dictating -3.,:lightibe thought to have the. i e 136 k w l e l r fear , would be tne evidence they might give. - witnesses, as tortoved from the Aninds of the 1 ,etherwise an undue bias might. opet4e.*°n their nltilds. By the instructions, he inten , d h e e d; n to ea i n n t ov th e '6t744.1ti 'be :given - to the -CoininiW . keaway all grounds of calumny e f:rom the legal ilec)tee di"s• The lion. Gentleman i, b -, / ' .l °vin; - his first clause, thata'siiinmary char es 6311161-itiviliitil -mgshould. be given Jo, the Alien of the , g . _ arlailst hum, by the Lords of t're aud that he ruight:haVe - the power of s Privy Council, II 4n(l4lxain;nitig witnesses-on oat: summoning 11 le tplestion having been -put,, he wou:ti .. to dscAsnEß,AG..ii rosela_i_ said, -lion. not lorelund to, follow the - -!i . matter -t::elaart 'through all the i ncidental o .d a e i n tt t l ai L-rned i. • observa apply "" v' t;„ llici l he had introduced) but i'''S at once...to the clauses d to be added t :a e rr d Gentleman had . which the .proposed It v. . eery Iron. ,as a and the ' Bill now before the House. "sY • rourse 'for !gun, and T' `1.1_;41-lii•-10 that all the .argem. efts were on their ....'earited Gcntlerneu_ to Id not now* Side ' 'bilt notwithstanding he W°ll the merits, enter at length into the argtimett-°r previous as ' s",`•=h had already been urged in the stag"'` of"the rriasurro, and it theretrirecou„it not i,i- goal, cebnsidered "as any derogation for. anya t ill_ I L' ti.. t° avoid inflicting upon the House e 1 9 ' 54 ' f them. The - two first r s‘, ard j r e /tot new; they ha 4, been broughtclaUseS proposed or. ecasions, , e > or more than once, on xria, 'th e flouse 'hail then expret r enable til",, theni. The first was a clause e m d er th ° eir sense ci i ;, `r lf inneil to enter into a regular short to have k „ . _ --r r, t4exatnine witnesses, andjudicialt° in- in that if there li,:''"Plete trial. Now 'he mist feelB;ll at a l!, it fir 411,Y grounds for an - alliiitfLelQe4tlY be actednco d n b co - k ~r circurnstalaces A O lien fr u p in4 o `o t im e atio n n i , that d if 17.‘, ted to the party-, I:st Prepared to grant the ed arimeasutirlee House ee were onlY to do, Bette 4 .Sr it h 3,4 been accustom ifis objection was it would be r not to hay.) it at all. into general N el .„ ,r a ,J eat to turning thl Vlitical tribunal- for the country. The se ll°4l n to the Constitution of the , p P ar b t7- , :-A tribunal un .,..acr°;lti g" the IlOnontable and Learnet! . Ge . nti o e-_ ti, 3 claims to Oxempt front the o . per_a ti ti , o l i a i nd f - "e 841 all those foreigners who were . F. , "tort o Isl 4, WIIS a9SIIMing i.ding bete before the War were legitimate ( I:, that no fOr l i n egn:rs 0 7 : sects of jf..2l:)asy bat' I.lot heretOlON. dam t h e y (5 ... become so coaaectioa ; might certairilf ro , n t l ho ti t i l e , hi n z.. with otl;:rrs t o l' i their countrythe intipsht but recent! have Odle I° l. jecti Qns to the two first clauses, those ob 1 j se, over. If h n e_ w h . e al . , t ,"'s were infinitely stronger to the third . ~r he could „ , 't,Ltier than or a tone°tnhe:i"a Government of , greater libel e r:t.', tha n to have • insinuated that the powers , f , ~,,. it Lots bitll. were likely t o be used C a oun - for the pur 1103e .. OE obstructing public" atpnrable and. Learned Gentleman must - T . he kn ir o o w: -.,..` 1at no Government would s;r r• for obstructina the . exercise purposes of justice,.ma, • '4 . from that belle, ill the minds - of 11.stteh h) his ten- IlltY'S-Aiinisters, he (Lord Castle'reag sta to th ti oi\. --e Tz'on. and Learned-0 ' i -- '' Y'S legal advisers, every'ficilitY iv tt l , . procu entlem h e a n, her r. y tvitnesses frorn abroad) , 1411v4hr f r , Any conduct of 41 - 0 ....-overnment to . grant. which it Was in the _, e $OO. not only Pointed at by the Clause -A *llld but 7eserve the co ndemnation of the eduntrn_ _ would ui,,.„.t. . ~- •• that House. A . l tii, yr• • impeacament from . ‘:- Ilan, nd'. Learned• Gent ,',/`'S zi . j,,, ; 1 ' he would • daysi ral• -4 within these fo , v . ~ Gentleman- had cast his i n , the foundcorl.l:_c, aniPle grounds of reprehension r ? t of- sorne indivicliials who (4:ino foreigners who had landed at D ) over, un hadassaulted 1 , 14„. ta . Ming they were Coming - there e)12.;11 ~,Y. now unfOrtunately pending. If- ace . ' as witnesses in the tite-141'0. an3' individuals-- who could so; disgrace c' l lll - ;; ve , s hY-conduct so contrary to every therePi Il'aS ~,"Pitality and justice, he thought Of pio n —an hut must reprobate.it,: and he trusted ti e —us e of ennmiens ,I)4Tl'to tii, .vg_lver iatrused Idea that Government would use_ any would. not give any san n pit vises of o zrocting j us t, to them for the "ce • and if this clause was adopted,. ~c ll3 . he tt, .„L' necessary infei'ence "iiicii Wouistle.'i:d4ra.livvans. the oli. Sc he ute Lord thet--of -the Nr ok , • ARLErr thought .the argument--of ~,,ad, for it most simply - to this, that the powers • ested roost extraordinary ui h n e en had ever It".tevvr hich the :Ministers were now to be divested in -1.11,,e, 80 odious and tyrannical, that it was . . " to them • ~ . tli.,_ , to trthigtne they Woul d his exercise ever Hon• Co. The clause,. as-vproposed by - .nt e-avned Friend of prev.. i ll , was fo r the purpose and ti, calmgmny. 116 (Mr. Scarlett) did not think b,Oble Lord would misuse the powers 4'til, but Lie - might be 'suspected- of misusing ofth it e , 4t 9; he did not think,. therefore, that• the publican. thetarge would be (mite so well satisfied;_ .; had 41 circumstance to which the. .NOble Lbrd h , tl c ~.., . t,, s • _ ..... s _ to hi 4 eu proper: terms ei reprenen. tot!, .`• — A,t_ . Se 4 Nnd,. a complete illustration of his .l -"I' )il rlett's) tv. , argument as to the NLI,-," ;111:3ject.. ..A.s. to...the other clauses, the itlf,""le Lord said the House had ...before heard PohliC sentiment 04 krgutnents upon. them ; but there was this ilirer''nee,- that the Bill Was now about to ex- I t i l ' and the Noble Lord had stated no reasons Itt evet for itg renewal. Was there, he would yo Aeration:or:circumstances - in two 3-bars? Were we still exposed to .the danger of revolu tion from foreigners ? During the war he had imdere.ood the Act was paSsed to prevent the machinations - of foreigners attacking their iittsti ttitions ; • but now did sfielt clingers exist ? All Goverrithents were now legitimate, all' dangers, 'therefore, from • 'abroad had ceased, and he thought that each time the Act 'was proposed •. to. be renewed it was necessary to have a state mentof the .causes . that rendered it necessary; .but the Noble Lord's argument was, make it as odious "tyrannical as you can, as it is only for two years ; and in this be agreed • with the Noble Lord, though not for exactly the same 'reason. What he (Mr.' SCailett) was afraid of was this, that; after repeated discus sions in :that tiodse;when the public were tired of hearing arguments urged withont 'producing any -effect,' that the NOble Lord would come down and propoSe to•make the - measure perma nent. And,' indeed, 'such Was hiS opinion of the • Noble 'Lord's talents and elOqUenee, that he 'had little 'doubt if 'he were now 'to propose it, he would carry it ;• so that he 'esteerried the present . Measure a proof-of the Noble Lord'sinederation. 'He would- not trespass Orr 'the tithe of 'the House, by• entering on the generalquestion,btit - this'intich he would state, that, in his opinion, no man, 'of whatever rant or professidn lie `might be, at , all consulted the 'good of his 'country by looking , back to the ages of the Tudors, in Order to Un derstand the British Constitution. .He"-was con tent to look. no farther back than that period when the-Constitution was settled on its present basis, he meant from the Revolution. downwards, and he could not applaud anyone who should revert . to the age of the 7th or Bth Henry ;, and he .was satisfied that there was no authority, at least lie hadnever read any, to shew.that the Crown ever possessed, in time of peace, the prerogative of disposing of the persons of foreigners the same asin'time of war. Mr. WELLESLEY POLE was astonished to hear the Hon. and I..arned Gentleman (Mr. Scarlett) say, that the 'abominable conduct of the rabble who had attacked the foreigners who had landed at Dover was an exemplification of the state of public feeling ; for his part he must say, that he trusted the rabble always would be against the Administration, 'for in critical times it was much like a pro - of that. Ministers were in the right. Vet that 'senseless act Of the mob was considered by the Hon. and Learned Gentleman as his main ,argurrient. He considered that if the House agreed to the proposition of the Learned Gentle man (Sir James Mackintosh) that they thereby held out the Administration as being biaskql upon a most unfortunate, most critical., and most deli cate inquiry, and therefore not fit to be trusted with the accustomed powers. He sat with great patience---(a latigh)---and heard the Most ex traordinary languacr ' e, sufficient to rouse. a man of the greatest apathy, alluding .(he said) to what had passed a few nights ago, when he ]heard his friends on that bench stigmatised as weak, Wretched, disjointed, and ineapable of con ducting the diTairs Of the country.---Here Mr. Scarlett gave sonic signal of diSsent.] - -:—Did the Honourable and Learned Gentleman mean to say, he had not charged them with being weak ? Mr. Sclar,irr.---" I did not mean to disaVow that. I certainly did say, on a former night, that the Administration was weak, vacillating, and disjointed. I hope that even in the warmth of debate I am incapable of reflecting unhandsomely on any individual, but I certainly. must claim the right of expressing in the strongest terms my sense of the conduct of the Administration of the Country." The SPEAKER trusted that Gentlemewwould be . convinced of the inconveniency of referring to particular expressions. PoEi said, he was always ready to bow to the suggestions of the Chair, but he hoped he was in order to say that' it was just as competent for him to defend the Administration wiegi strength and boldness, as it was for the Hon. and Learned' Gentleman to attack in that way. lie would not refer to former nights, for now the Hon. and I.46arned Gentleman had been pretty bold in' his charges; they were still vacillating, weak, and diSjointed . ;, but he had not heard that they wanted either the confidence: of the House or the; Public. He would put a case hypotheti cally :---Supposeone of the . great leaders had de clared that the question was nothing less than whether the Adininistration should be in or out, and' suppose on that question they were heater three 'to one, he had hoped that something might arise to 'enable him to' touch .those Gentlemen, to shewlhe:. public that' - with all. their talents and abilities they had always foiled their'', and he trusted in God they 'always . woul.illt—(A laugh.) He begged pardon for .the digression he' had made, and was extremely sorry that he had agi tated- the Learned Gentleman at all (A laugh), whoSe explanation he was very glad to have got. Mr. SCARLETT begged to say that he . had not introduced the cirCumstance of the violence com mitted at Dover, and that lie was as incapable of mistaking the cry or the rabble for public opi nion, as the votes of the House of Commons for dkta of infallibility. _ . Mr. W. pni. explained. Amick6titY said, if the Gentlemen who sat on that side the . 1 - louie were desirous th a t the world . should form an opinion of th e a biliti es , judgment, and temper of the present Adminis tration from the speech of the liOn. Gentleman . (Mr-. W. Pole), they could hardly desire to place it on a better footing. The proposition of his Hon. and Learned- Friend (Sir J. Mackintosh) deserved a better reception than it had met with from the House and the Noble Lord. He thought there was no person in that House or in the coun try who possessed true English feeling; but would concur in the censure passed on the transaction whichtook place at Dover, and would' hope that all traces of that business could be obliterated. fie thought it a pity that some better. accommo dation should not be provided for those-foreign ers, than suffering them to roam about the streets .of London at midnight, ignorant where to direct their steps. Mr. MARTIN Thought it Wag wrong to, wish to chancre the soleinn pledge Which the Noble Lord (Castlereagh) had given, and which did him so much honour, (that promise that he would afford every facility for the produ'cing her Igajesty's witnesses), for the inoperative dause now pro posed. Sir J. MACKINTOSII congratulated the non. pentleman (Mr. W. Pole) on the generous matiOn, and at the sanie time that undisturbed serenity of mind and strict regard to the rules of Parliamentary order with which he had animad verted on the observation of liis Honourable and Learned Friend (Mr. Scarlet°.;lle asked whe ther an Administration which adopted accusation at one moment, and disclaimed it at the next--- who threatened an individual with prosecution one day, and the next day laid the majestysof Parliament at her feet, by . iinploring that indivi dual *to forego her just rights, whether that w,as not a vacillating Administration ? The Noble Lord had not given any reply to that part of his argument Which regarded foreign witnesses, where he had acknowledged that he did not ap prehend the exercise of the power to banish them from this country ; but the trite point to attend to was the necessity, of removing from the _minds of those witnesses that that power would be exerted, and be, would. appeal to the. House if that argument was prima facie so absurd as to _ . justify its being pas;ed . over in contemptuous si lence. It was either contempt or incapacity to answer, for in fact no answer had been given. Ile could not see what the proceedings. at Dover had to do with the present question ; for those outrages the law was sufficient as it stood, and neded not the aid of that House to put the ma chinery in motion.; but had it not been so, it was strange that call should be made. by those who in the fast Session refused all inquiry into charges of the most important nature, on the ground that they were cognizable in the ordinary Courts of Justice. Looking through our history, it:would always be found that' every prerogative of the Crown was guarded, and controuled by law, and now, that it Was proposed to invest. the Crown with'a new prerogative, he called upon them, in conformity with the wisdom of our Constitution, .for a security against it.. The only way for Mi nisters to spew that they have no intention of abusing the power which they required, was. to submit to that curb which would render it impos sible for theui to abuse-it. . . Some conversation now ensued between Sir J. MAckiNTOsn and Mr. CANNING ; the latter Gen tleman insisting that the former had been out of order in extending his observations, as he was only entitled to explain, and not to reply at length. The SriAKtn said, that he had been somewhat to blanie in not reminding the lion. and Learned Gentleman that his observations had extended beyond the limits of an explanation, to which in strictness be was limited. It was then uuderstOod that the three clauses of Sir J. Mackintosh should be disposed of in the first instance. Mr. CANNING said, that it appeared to him that all the arguments had been exhausted long ago, and that as much discussion on this measure had taken place as was necessary on the renewal of an existing statute. It being considered as settled in the secon d reading, that the Executive Government were to have .the powers granted by that Bill, the Hon. and Learned Gentleman interposes a clause to prevent abuse, which if those to whom it was confided were capable of so abusing, they ought to be' driven With scorn and detestation from their offices, as unfit to perform the lowest func tions of them. 'The lion. and Learned Gentle- man Macintosh) who moved. the proposi tiOn; Professed to have no doubt or suspicion of the Government, but the' 'Other Hon. and Learned Gentleman (Mr. Scarled) did find on the cha racter of the Government the necessity of the enactment. He would ask that Honourable and Learned: Gentleman if he thought the House could pass it without suggesting a suspicion on the_ Ministers ? It was right and proper that all the ordinary . abuses of power ( ought to be carefully guarded against, but there . were some abuses so enormous, that the Legislator of old,: who, would not enact a law' against parricide, had not more reason than . the House have to refuse this enactment. But, suppose the clause adopted, what defence would the Mi nister's have against such a mt§conStruction as this, which.would certainly take place? It would be said," The Ministers are so prone to the abuse of power, that 'without that Oause had passed they would undoubtedly have sent all the Queen's witnesses.out of the country."--,(Hear, hear !)--- He preferred,, therefore, incurring the suspicion no*, only Putting in his claim to the lion. and Learned Gentleman's testimony next year, when the caution, would be found to have been untie. cessary. He had hoped that when the time ar rived that the question w hick had been so ge nerally the topic should have come to some thing like a judicial form, that when no longer the: direct subject of debate, that it would have been .abstained from, and not have been fomented by anticipating,- by snatches and pieces of debate, keeping alive by such means those feelings which were peculiarly dis qualifying to the House for the task which awaited it. He therefore would not advert to the subject further than to observe, that in adopt ing the Resolution to her Majesty, in catching at the last hope which it held out, he took his share of the blame of vacillation. That Resolu tion did, he thought, embody the sense of the House, and in words . too which, though . perhaps not critically expressed, yet when the sentim e nts were what he could not but approve of, they would have been blameable not to have taken that chance for attaining the object which, for so many months, had been the anxious wish of the Administration, and the adoption of that Resolution was,a striking proof of their since rity.---(Ilear!)---If they had sinned at all, it was by excess of endeavour to avoid the inquiry, and,ex . cess had been tenfold theif wouldresiilt to had thatb eeti more fortunate ! So far from it being a reproach to the Administration that they were driven to that Resolution, it would be a consolation to him which he would not forego fqr, any earthly advantage, that ,that last hope had been tried.---(Hear, hear !), The SPEAKER then put the question on the two first clauses,'m hich were negatived without a di vision. On the third clause being about to be put, . Sir i. 111AcKINTosif rose and ,stated, that hiS ob. iection was-not to the words of the Resolutioni'birt he objected to it ou constitutional grounds. if -the House offered an address to a subject, however high in rank, still that. personage had no responsible ad visers; and it followed. therefore, that the House of Commons might be treated with the greatest in-' dignity by. an individual. If they addressed the Crow'n, the King in usthave advisers and, as againSt them :the House had a - remedy. There was not another instance,. lie believed, of the House Commons .presenting an Address of advice: It was , not, therefore, to the words Of the Resolu tion that he objected ;- he disdained minute Cri ticism, but it was to the principle • that his ob jection went. The Hon. and Learned Gentle man_ proceeded to answer other objections which had been urged, which he did with his accus tomed ability. • • Mr. CANNING thought that, sanguine -as --the Hon. and Learned Gentleman (Mr. Scarlett) was of*the instability of the Administration," and the short duration ,of it, he must •allow they had some reason to believe the clause proposed ,by the Hon. and Learned Gentleman (Sir James Mack intosh) had something personal in it. RecUrring to the subject of the-Resolution presented to her Majesty, he said it was framed in the same spirit which had all along actuated the - Ministers, and they were glad to seize one more chance afforded by the concurrence of those respectable persons who agreed in the same opinion. Mr. SCAItLETT assured the Right-Hon. Gentle man he was not sanguine about the- dissolution of the-Ministry, no man could be less So, for he thought they never would dissolve -till-the Go vernment was dissolved by them.---(H-ear!)---lie had- avoided giving any -opinion- on the merits of the question which - had been introduced-in that debate, and -would only says that as far as his poor abilities went he would see that no injustice was done. He certainly had a strong feeling of compassion, and above all,a-feeling that the" safe of the country ,should not be endangered. Mr. DExmiN said, he had not been in the House at the commencement of the debate, but he thought it a great argument against the Mien Bill that such a case should be quoted ; but he had principally risen to protest against the lan guage of the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Can ning,) who had spoke as if the - failure of now Resolution had led to the proceedings adopted. These proceedings were, he believed, adopted, because that House had no taste to enter into discussion with the Crown, in a case where in their consciences they believed ,the Crown was in the wrong. He. thought it a gross dereliction of duty in the House to pause as they did. lie would not inquire what would- have been the result if a Committee had been ap pointed to inquire into the Green Bag charges— those dpcuments without authority---but he was satisfied no. twenty-one Gentlemen would have volunteered for the work.---(Hear!) The ATTORNEY-GENERAL deprecated the 'as sinning that the evidence in the green bag was of no authority ; and as her Majesty was presumed to be innocent till trial had, so the charges should. not be stigmatized .as - false till facts would jus tify it. _ _ Mr. 7.. G RANT supported the clause. Sir J. IVlAclimasit explained. - After which the question was loudly called for, and the gallery was about to .be cleared for a division, but the clause was ultimately negatived without a division. The House then resolved itself into a. corn mittee, the Bill went through that ,stage, and the Report was ordered to -be received to-morrow. After a few words from Sir J. NEWPOII3 S the third reading of the Bill was postponed. BARRACK AGREEMENT, Upon. the bringing up of the Report upon the Barrack Agreement, Ur. CALCKAFT neither objected to the Cavalry h!iving Barracks, nor to their being. situated in the'Rvzent's-nark; hut it was to the terms of the contract that he called the at tention of the House. • The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER stated, that the bargain must of course depen4 upon -the apprObai ion . of Parliament: The Contractors were aware, that, it disapproved by the House, it would he set aside. To him however, it appeared that the measure was' peculiarly Akible. The ani:ual cost of lodging-money and - harraeli-expenses for the :egiment in question dui ing the latter part of the war had been 6,0001. That amount had been recfnced since the peace, and averaged now at from 4,4001. to• 5,5001. a-year: Sir JOHN NEWPORT disapproved-of the annuity scheme ; it was a principle for those who could nut raise money to pay fur what they wanted Mr. W. ‘VILLIANIS thought that the 2d Regiment of Lift Guards might be perfectly well accommodated in those bar- racks at Croydon now occupied by the waggon train. Mr. ELLICE saw no n4cessity for the barrack proposed, and deprecated the system of raising fortifications through the country for the purpose of overawing the people. He disapprort oft he bargain, merely as a bargain. ' Lord PALMERSTON• was surprised to - hear any objet tion to a proposition which, by a Mere continuance of the current expellee, would leave to the country, at the expira tion of thirty-one years, possession of a emnplete and ade quate barrack ; the less the soldiers were broui;ht into coo. tact with the Inhabitants the better. Lord ALTrIOUP protested vehemently against the doctrine laid down by the . Noble Lord opposite. Such had mit beeni the doctrine acted upon by our aneestors Ihe very exist. , ence of hafraclis had been objected to upon the same piinei; ple o❑ which that Noble 'Cord now recommended them—that they tended to separate the citizen from the soldier. sir. Nl. SMITH objected to the extenbion of the barrack system. . . After a few words from Sir W.De•Crespiviey, Mr. Thomat Wilson. 'and Mr. Mob& rly,the House dividetl. • For bringing up•the Repent, 2N I Azainst it, 14. • 7. re-admitte.l, we found Mi. CAI CRAF objecting that no advertisement had been published to secure a competition. UNION MIMS BILL. On the question that the Union Ditties' Bill be read a third time, Sir H. I'AIINELL gave notice that he would renew his motion on this subject -in the in xt session. Mr. LITTLETON, after a few remarks, noved the oinisiiou Of the word 4 ! pottery" from the BM. A division took place, alter the Chancellor of the Ex c h e _ qu,r, Sir J. Newport, amid Mr. W. Parnell had each given their opinion. -For the omission, 43 I Against.it, 34. The. Bill was read a third tiMe, and lIHRSed. The other Orders of the Day were then gone hi; rook; ), the House adjourned at Halt-past Twelve,