The Sun. — London, England, 1824-11-23 00:00:00

?' ' •• - - N. . . - 31 4.. ... . .. . ( .' l ,, :7 • ': ' '' ' '.-. ' ' ' ,A 4,7.4 4, ..,......„ ::-., .. ~,,.: . , .:-.,.. .-.; 7. ' . I .• 7. , OZ: t.(17'1(14;11-(1' ".J,• - : ';,' .-.• •.! , • . --- 1 0 v.''. . .S' - ..' 7 -' - '...k. 1.. ,;--- , ,:ke. :, ,,, , , )‘ ‘ : .: , . 0 i,,, ~.,free 4111 t 4 .. ‘,,, . . S U .I‘k% • , . - A- -7 -' -6--- ____.o 4,-,, , , i'N ~,,--"eiA's, ,, , . per -s a on, ,1 s od s od i od ,od ,od ‘&„ tam NUMBER 10,046. TUESDAY . EVENING, NOVEMBER 23,, 1824. Pittc.E StIVENPENC.E. PICTUdLLING-OFFICE, Nov. 9, 1944. THE COMMISSIONERS for VICTUAL LING EsTr o NAVY, efO. do hereby iiVe Notice, that on Tuesday, the 80th Instant, they will bs ready to receive Tenders in writing (sealed up), and treat forthe supply (on separate Contracti) of all such Quantities q4l•:.k PROVISIONS, including RUM, as may demanded Jro the we of Hu Majesty's Ships and Vessels at the places "dte•mentioned, front Me Ist January to the- 31st Deana: 4r, IRV), inclusive, vie.: Wye, leillank • K‘sietuon and - Dublin L ondonderry and Longtiewill7 L eitht Leith Roads, and the Frith of Edinburgh Aar) Li!orpooi. I le Conditions of the Contracts maoe seen at this Office, Sr oppistiog to the Secretary of the Postaiaster:General tll46l in, qnd to the Collector of the Cessions: at each' of , othet places. 4411 Tender must specify the Prii.e in IPords at length, ss dôt delivered before One o' Clock ins the day appointed ; and new be accompanied by a Letter signed by two responsible Pe ""ne engaging to become bound with the Party tendering 6/ I ele penal sum of 5001. for the due performance of each of 14 Contracts. The 'Person who makes She Tender, or souse Person on his I I V, must attend to ;metier when called for. VERY FAST TRAVELLING, • To BIRMINGHAM and LIVERPOOL, DAY - and NIGHT, by FOUR. INSIDE COACHES, which KEEP GOOD TIME, from the, SA ItACEN'S HEAD INN, SKINNER-sTREET,• every Morning, to titeGeurge jun. Suivlerland, at reduced Fares. information should not be exhibited against them, for a libel on the Marquis of Hastings. Before he stated the paragraph itself, or the denial given to its insinuations, he thought it right to. de tail the circumstances which had occasioned ' a delay in the application; for the libel appeared so long ago, that he should decline applying to the Court, unless he could "show reason to except the case from the general rule. As soon as the article was published, the friends of Lord Hastings, who was absent from this country, took measures in order to move this Court for the protection of his character: They were, however, ad vised, that the affidavit' of the Noble Marquis himself would be, necessary to the success of the motion, and they immedi ately wrote to him to procure it. In reply he sent an affidavit, ample in substance, but sworn before an officer whom the Court could not recognize as having competent authority to take it. When, therefore, the a ffi davit arrived, the friends of Lord Hastings found that they could not use it, and were obliged- to send to his Lordship to rectify the error. Lord Hastings then swore his affidavit before the Chief justice at Malta, 'who filled an office which the Court had recognized as giving authority to administer such an oath. • The LORD CHIEF JutiTicE asked if the Learned Counsel hail an affidavit of some person here that the signature was genuine, and that the party filled the office of Chief Justice. Mr. SCARVETT replied that he had, and proceeded to state that the affidavit of Lord Hastings did not arrive till after the end of Trinity term. Mr. Justice BarLEY inquired the date of the publication complained of. Mr. SCAIMETT said the paragraph appeared in the Sunday Vines of the 26th of January, in the present year. It was headed, " Intended Impeachment of an Illustrious Personage" --.and proceeded to state, that " extraordinary discoveries had beea made at the India House;" and to insinuate that, in con sequence of a deficiency Co the extent of 300,01101., the Court of Directors intended to impeach an illustrious person, with an allusion to the apparent determination to withhold the usual pension from the late Governor-General in India. The Mar quis of Hastings, in his a ffi davit, stated th a t he believed the. paragraph was intended to apply to him ; that lie had been Governor-General .of India from October, 1013, to January, 11123; that, during that time, there was no deficit in any ac count whatever under his controul ; that- he hail never partici pated nor sought to participate in any fund to which as Gover nor-General lie was not fully entitled ; but that, on the con. trary, he had refused to take advantages, which he understood rested only on custom, and not on positive law. The Noble Marquis further deposed, that there was never, to his know ledge, any intention of preferring an impeachment against him on the ground of a deficiency or on any other cause ; that no accusation or complaint of such a nature ever was made against him ; and that he believed the proceedings at the India House relative to the grant of a pension rested on other and Afferent grounds. Thus the Marquis of Hastings had given a full denial of all the allegations in this libellous paragraph, and all the inferences which could be drawn from it by the reader. The Loan CitzEr JUSTICE.--l - lave you affidavits to bring home the publication to the parties against whom you move. Mr. ScARLICT.T.—I have, my Lord. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE—Then take a rule to show cause. injury. Mr. Newman alleged that lie-had givengeneral orders that all articles left by c u stom e r s s ho u ld b e carried to the bar that the waiter, in disobedience of this command, had locked up Lord Egremont's cane in a closet, and that the servant provob- ,- ed him by insolent language. The promecutor,• on the other - hand, alleged that the cane was placed in an open pantry, and that he retaliated in words only when suffering from the de , fondant's violence. The prosecutor represented the injury as serious and lasting, while the surgeon, who had not ap— peared in answer to the attorney at the trial, considered it as of • a trifling nature. The topics which these affidavits presented on each side were, urged by Mr. KELLY for the prosecution, and the COMMON SEILIEANT for the defendant. TOTTENHAM and EdManton Coa . ches daily, at Eleven, Half-past Two, Five, and Eight o'clock. WAK.EFIF;LD Four inside Post-Coaches, every Morning and Afternoon, at reduced Fares. WARWICK and Leamington Day and Night Coaches, through Daventry, Weedou, Toweester, a ndStotrey Stratford. o WELLS, Bridgewater, T aunton , Frilmu'll, and ,PI) , mouth. Coaches, and to all Parts of th e West of England. WEYMOUTH " Magnet" Coach, through BagshOt, Black water, Basingstoke, Overton, Whitchurth, Andover, Wood yeati, Cashmore, Salisbury, Blanilford, and Dorchester; at a Quarter past Five o'Clockin the Mousing. Driven through Wit 1.1 Two Coachmen' only. WEYMOUTH PACKETS to Guernsey, Jersey, Cher. boor};, St. Maine's, &c. every Wednesday and Saturday af ternorm, at Two, from Weymouth. WOLVERHAMPTON only Day Coach to Dudley, West Bromwich, and Meriden, through Coventry—Morning, at a quarter before 7, and every afternoon. YORii " Express," to Scarborough, Whitby, Shields, Sun derland, Newcastle, and 'Edinburgh, a New light Font inside Post Coach, with a Guard.. throughout ; sets out every Morning by way of Newark, It _tford, Doncaster, Fey rybridge; Tadcaster, Darlingt o n, Noithallerton, Durham, Mut petit, and Berwick, and arrives- at York next Morn. ing, '.t reduced Fares. Wren through with Four Coach. men only. .Passengers finding themselves fatigued on the journey, may rest what time they please, and then proceed without any additional Fare. At Reduced Fares to Ramsgate, Margate, and C'unter bury. S. A. MOUNTAIN and Co. respectfully acquaint their Friends and t lie Public, that they will n A be accountable lot any Parcels, Passenger's Luggaa... Wiitings.Plate, &cr. of mars than Five Pounds Value, if lost, stolen, or damaged, unless entered as such, and ta u t intnrartee Paid accord ingly, at the Satacen's Head Inn, Skinner-street, SNOW-HILL, LONDON. T HE following LIGHT. POST-COACHES, and MAILS, &c: set out from the above loll: BIRMINGHAM "Tally Hut" fast Day Coach, in thir teen hours, Morning at a quarter before Seven - , through .Red burn, Market Street, Dunstable, Brick hill, Fenny Stratford, Stoney Stratford, Towcester, %Veedon, Darentry, Dmichurch, Coventry, and Stone Bridge, to the Castle Hotel and St. tieorge's Tavern, High-stteet, Birmingham, to Shiffhall, Wellington, Bridgenorth, Shelton, Shrewsbury, Qswestry, Nantwoch, Tarporley, Bangor, Chester, and Holybeatl. Driven through with two Coachmen only. In consequence. of the decided preference given to the Tally Ho Coach, tl►r Proprietors are determined i►o expence shall be spared to render it the first conveyance on the Birmingham Road. The Conn., after admonishing the defendant to put mofil constraint on his passions, sentenced him to pay n fine of Of. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Nov. 22. Sittings in Banco. gELUUHNE v. UPJOHN'. BIRMINGHAM " Royal RxpreSs," New light .fast Night Coach, in 15 hours only, sets out' every afternoon, carry. ing Four Inside only; passes through Warwick, Learning ton, Southall', Weedon, Daventry, Stoney Stratford, and Tom:ester, to the Saracen's Head, Bull-street, Rivaling bans, early the next Morning. BROMPTON, Chatham, Rochester, Gravesend,. Stioud, Sittingbourne, Rainham, :and Ospringe, every Morning. This watt an action to recover 71. 10s., the value of 15 far.' turkies, the property of the plaintiff. The case was tried en Thiirsday last at the . Sittings in London, and on that occasion the plaintiff was nonsuited, on the ground that the declantion was for goods sold andtelivered, but the proof went only tor goods to be sold on Commission. Mr.'Sergeant VotlOrIAN now moved for a rule to shew cause why that noasnit should not be set aside,and a new trial gra 'fled. Tie Learned Sergeant was about to state the grounds of his motion, when The Lone CHIEF JUSTICE observed, that bell re the casts was tried, application was made to him on behalf of the plain. tiff, for leave to amend his declaration. lle was disposed to do: so, when it was intimated on. the part of the defendant, that the plaintiff amended his - declaration he (the defendant) would file a demurrer. On this his Lordship gave leave to plaintiff toomend, with the understanding that he was to withdraw his record, and that the' defendant was afterwards to rest on his .demurrer, and not enter a new plea. The parties, how ever, after this, consulted with their Counsel, and agreed to go to trial on the declaration and pleas as they stood. The plain tiff was nonsuited. Under these ciretunstances, he (the herd Chief Justice) did not see how the Court could assist the parties, as the matters now stood. If they had any appetite for further legal proceedings, let. them commence agani with fresh pleas. BARNSTAPLE, Soutlunolton, Crediton, Tiverton, North lawton, Oakitampton, Torrington, Chumleigh,• lifraeolub, - aud Biddeford, Nc..v light fast Coach, every morning, at 7. BATH and BRISTOL Cheap rust-Coaches, through Chip pen haul, Caine, Marlborough, H ungerford, tieWbury, and Heading, evety Afternoon at one; arrive at the Greyhound Inn,. Bath, the London Tavern, Thonias-Street,' and Swan, Bristol, early the next Morning. At reclined Fares. M. WALLER CLIFTON. CONTILICY' for BLACK SILK 114.VDKERCHIEFS. No ro- (Vice, Nov. 92, 1321. THE PRINCIPAL, OFFICERS and COM AIISSIONERS of HIS m.vEsrrs N.,11 1 7 do hereby giro 'otire.. That on Thursday, the 9:4 of December next. at One o'Clork, they will be ready to treat witk such Permit.. as moy be willing to Contract for supplying Hit Majesty's . 1)of k Yard at neptford with Mr. Sergeant VAUGHAN :odd his client had a greater appe. tite for the turkey.—Motion refused. 111.dCK Sit K I . IINDK.EUCIIIEFS. Specimen tut' Me Handkerchief's, and a Form of the Tender may lie •W ern at this Office. No Tender will be re. (Tired after One *Thick, on the clay of Treaty, nor any no ticed, unless the party, or an "igen! for attends. ARCHES COURT, Nov. '22. MOGG v. )100G. Every Tender twat be aret;niptOied iy , a Letter' ad i/ressert to the Nam/ Board, and signed by a responsibto Person, engaging to become bound with the Person ten. tiering, in the Sum of 4004 fur the, due perfornsonce of the Contract. Dr. Arm t.n said, this was a suit promoted by LouisaMogt; against her husband for a divorce, by reason of adultery arnt cruelty. A libel had been put in on behalf of Mrs. Mogg, to the admission of which hehad to object. . . Dr. JENNEn, on behalf of Mrs. Mogg, said that the cae was of a very peculiar nature, and he could only find one si• milar to it; that was a case brought from York to the Court of Delegates, and had even gone farther than this had done. Sir Jour NICHOL thought Mrs. Mogg was certainly en., titled to the relief she prayed: He therefore declared the libel admissible. LAM INTELIAGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Nov. 22. TUE PRESBYTERY V. REV. 'ALEX. MATCHER. PICTU4LLING-..OFFICE, Nov. 9. ins!. E COM3IISSIONERS for VICTUAL . LING Ili: 411,1JESTY'S N . 44 1 ,7, tte.do hereby give 1 14 e, that on Wed ne sday, the lel December next, they will " r eedy to receive Tenders:in writing (sealed :up), and treat fir t ripply, on separate Contracts, of what FRESH 'EP may be required for the sue of Has Majesty's Ships ; 41 Possel s a t t h e p l aces un d er - m entioned, from the Ist of 'ery to the Ma of December, 1825, inclusive, viz..:.-"• Co tk and Kins. I Chatha m e Quip ' ettown fl own , Vtilninut to tlfil way itud Clifden flreenock KiNgstuwu and Dublin . did 4 40 fir the use of the Officers and Men attached to the t ,' 2al, 811 , 41h, 51/i, and t;th Divisions (tithe Coast Block '''t fur the Prevention if .cmuggling, in the Counties of 4 eid and SIISSTX, on separate Contracts for rack Division. 114 Cvnditions of else Contracts may be seen at this Office . or 6 V applying at the Post-Office at Dublin; to Mr. Reeks, 3b . Miller, Mr. Stokes, or Mr. Dunsterville, dgents for e4t P ictualling at Portsmouth, Plymouth, Chatham, and ° rh, reepectively ; to Mr. Elwin, Victualling Wharf, Do b"; 411 r. T rounse ll, D ea l Y ar d ; Mr. C. Bartlett, at Brix -44'11; to Captain 4 1 1'Culloch, at Deal; and to the Purtirs V . the respective Dioi.sions of the Coast Plochade ; or to the ( fillettors of His Majesty's Customs at each aif the other Pi 4 Leith, Leith Roads, and the Frith of Edinburgh Liverpool Londonderry and Loughswilly Milford Haven Portsmonth Plymouth Sheerness And Torbay. Each Tender must specify the price in words at length, lie delivered before 074 o'clock on the day appointed 'd must be accompanied byes Letter,-signed by two responsi- Lle P.rions, engaging to become bound with the Party ten. e rwit, 14, the Penal Sums of 2,0001. for the due perform -41" *V the Portsmouth and Plymouth Contracts, of 1,0001. . 4 ? Chatham and Sheernes4 and of 5001 for each of the w ar Contracts. 4 nir Person who stakes the Tender, or Jenne Person on 4 61140 1, ,must attend to answer when called for. M. WAILER CLIFTON. • OFFICE OF ORDNANCE, Nov. 5, 1824. inE. PRINCIPAL OFFICERS of MS MAJESTY's ORDNANCE do hereby give Notice, that 4)1 "all• will be received at their O ffi ce in Pall Mall on Or 1 10 ° re MONDAY, the 29th November instant , fr o nt such -1"1 " 1 as may be willing to PURCHASE about One Hun l'lf'd and Twenty Tons of UNSERVICEABLE IRON ORD. 11 1. AN CE, together with a quantity of UNSERVICEABLE llJ r °f various natures , now in Store at His Majesty's , 10 " „. Nharf at Chatham, from which station the Ordnance shd Shot are to be removed by.l he Purchasers. ir4rt hee partiCulars may be had upon application at the Se. e rKaryll , i O ffi ce, in Pall Mall, bet Ween the hours of Ten an d -ou r I also at theiGun %Vitae( at Chatham, where the 'flatlet and Shot may be viewed ; and the Proposals must : s ealed up and indorsed, , c PrOposals . for the Purchase of rdrU tttee and Sh o t a t Chath am ;" but no Proposal will be admi tted after Twelve O' Clock on Monday,, the 29th Instant, ne it her will any Tender be notice.), unless the Party making °r an Agent on his behalf, shall attend. By Order of the Board, WM. GRIFFIN, Secretary. MORE THIRTY THOUSANDS ! TO THE PUBLIC. WREN I made the last Lottery Scheme, „ Introduced Thirty Thousand Pound Prizes, (as I ,;uy do when Contractor ;) and 1 gave as a reason for so th t .„__Ri that those Prizes are generally sold at my Offices, and Nestl x, lt .has proved the correctness of my anticipation, for I tilis tei eh l. 1 5,756 the 30,0001. Prize, drawn 3d inst. in Seven .dep t j and I am happy to find the present Contractor . has thap e r ntY plan, as he has introduced Two 30 , 000!. Prizes ; lige n n .a I look forw ar d to next mont h a ddi ng to t h e a l rea dy . Ifi rm e c' List of 30,000/. Capitals sold by me, for I sold the yGr drawn—the Last ever drawn—Three in one Lottery allow o urteen other 30,000/. Prizes. I do not hesitate ac tel7filhis that the present Scheme is an improvement upon c00:47 , m addition to the Two 30,000!. Prizes, there are chant:- 0 ,000/., an d var i ous other Cap i ta l s , an d my arrange kt not having any Blanks is continued ; but the principal t riflirt. n the New Scheme is, that some persons must, for the the ot t lusk of 4/. 195., get the Two 20,000/. Prizes, and all atia ...et Capitals may be gained by an equally trifling Risk ; with rfor less than 10s., 1,2501. must be obtained. Schemes, kay e, Particulars of this advantageous mode of adventure, 44 011;1 44 ' Fads, at my Offices, where Tickets and Shares 4, c o -- ,!••••^1 have the honour to be your devoted Servant, • rain, &9 Charing-cross. BISII, Stockbroker. se,_ feel ao confident in the stability of the`English Funds, rano!? assured that the Prices of all British Securities must be tifo t r r a_blY higher, that I hereby undertake to pay the Holders Lit Tri - ,7,!,.°f the Stock Prizes in the present Lottery, if bought 'nay' `mices, 100/. Money An each 100/. 3 per Cents., should . mes are drawn. _ not be above that Price in the Stock Market when the 41. The Lottery draws the 16th of Next Month. BOSTON New Royal Patent Mail to, Louth, through . Royston, Cambridge, Huntingdon, Stilton, Peterborough, Deeping, Spalding, Spilsby, Alford, and Gii•usby, Eveni n g, at Half past 7, Sunday, -at a Quarter before 7. CAMBRIDGE New Royal Patent , Mail, through Ware, Buntingford, Buckland, and Royston, .Evening, at Half past 7, Sunday, at a Quarter before 7. • CARLISLE " Express," to Penrith, and Whitehaven, a New Light Four-inside Post Coach, with a Guaitl all the way, passes through Appleby, Brough, Bowes, Greta. bridge Richmond, Catterick, Buroughbridge,. FerrylisidAe, Doncaster, Newark, Bawtt y, Grantham, Stamford, Gree. tkaM, Stilton, Biggleswade, and Unblock. Sets out in the Morning, and performs the journey with the greatest faci lity ; at reduced Fares. • Passengers detained on the Road by business or pleasure, have the peculiar , advontitge 'of their Seats being secured in the next Coacher-Tier only direct 'Coach tnCarlisle. CH ESTEIt Light CoacheS to Newport, Whiteelkurch, Tar porley, Nampt wick, Nort belch, and Middlewich, every morn ing and afternoon. • . • COVENTRY "Tally Ho," light fast Day Coach, every morning at a quarter before 7, through ltedhorn, Dunstable, Stoney Stratford, Towcestcr, Weedon, Daventry, and Dun church. . • . DORCHESTER New light Day CoaChei, iii fourteen hOuis only, through Bagshot, Blackwater, Basingsteke. Ove.o o fir Whitchurch, Andover, Salisbury, Wood) eats, ,Cashinore, and Bland ford, at a quarter past :5 and 7in the morning'. • EXETER " Sovereign " New light fast Coach every miirn.. ing at 7 0%14)04 01;0110; Honiton, Axminster, Charmouth, it,idpr'rt, Dorchester, Blandford, ‘Viiiolvates Inn, S4liShlirY l Stockbridge, Sutton, Basiugstuke, [Backwater, and Bags hot. GLASGOW, Longtown,Ciiretna-green, Annan, Dumfries, Itrowubill, Thornhill, Sauquhar-Kiln, Qiummek, and all Parts of Scotland, a light Four insida Post Coach daily. HARROWGATE and Ripon new Light Post Coaches, evert -Afternoon at Two, and a quarter.before Eight , in the Morning. HERTFORD Coach, through Waltham Cross, Cheshiunt, Htddestlon. and Ware. HOLYHEAD New light fast Day Coach, through Blidge north tValsal, Shrewsbury, and Salop, every morn i ng . HAY EAD New light fast Night Coach, through Bridge north Walsall, Shrewsuory, and Salop, every erols011• HULL Express," a New Light Post Coach, to Lincoln, Northeave, Howden, and Doncaster, every Morning, to the Cross Keys, Market-place, Hull and also the " Rocking ham" in the Afternoon at Two. KENDAL Light fast Post Coaches to Laucaster, Kirby-Lonsdale, Bolton, Calorley, Onoskirk, and Garstang, every morning and afternoon., Preston, KIDDERMINS TER, Stoarbridge, and Dudley, through Birmingham, and West Bromwich, light Coaches every morn ing and afternoon. LEEDS " Rockingham," light Post, Coach, sets out every Afternoon at Two; and passes through Baldoek, Big r gleswatle, Eaton, lincittlen, Stilton, Watisforo, Stamford, Greet ham, Grantham, Newark, "'oxford, Markham Moor, Retfoid, Ilawtry, Doncaster, and Ferrybridge, arrives at the Golden Lion Inn, Leeds, next Afternoon at Three, in time or the Bradford, Halifax, Skipton, and Huddersfield Coaches. Driven through with Four Coachmen ouly.—Luggage and Packages only id per lb.—Notwithatanding the uncommon. Expedition of this Coach, it is allowed to be the most agi ye able and complete Public Conveyance on the North Road, being unequalled by any,Other. LIVERPOOL and Staffordshire Potteries New light fast Day Coach, every morning at a quarter before T. LIVERPOOL " Umpire," New light fast Four Inside Coach, in 97 hi/ors only, Out 'one Night on the Road), sets out Daily at One ; and arrives at Liverpool next afternoon, thtough Woburn, Latlihury, Northampton, ‘Velford, Lot terworth, Hinekley,At herstone, Litchtield,Stone, Newcastle, Kotiword, Warrington, and Ptescut. • LIVERPOOL " Royal Express," New light Four Inside c li t t :t s , t C do )a n c g h l i l o t t l t 7 L a anht(viotuililiist only, through g 7 l ;t;; V i grl ; N . , g g K:n n u ' o t i s i P fo r t e t k c Slone, Stafford, Road), every Afternoon ; arrives at the Saracen's Heat Inn, Dale-street, Liverpool, next Afternoon. Th e a de all „ tages to Travellers who honour this Coach with their pre. ierenee are far snperior.tu any other on this Road, especially , to Commercial Interests, at it performs the joorney 11, Ires time than any other Coach ; notwithstanding its cheap ness and expedition, the Proprietors ',ledge themselves that for safety and accommodation it is equalled by few, and shall be surpassed by none: MANCH ES TER and Altringbam New •light very fast nal to the Moiety Arms and SW 4 Swa n Coach, every morning MANCHESTER to Winslow, coogleton, Newcastle, Wal sall, Wolverhampton, and Knotsford, light Four Inside Coaches. m A nBoRoUGH and .Swindon, fnor-inside Day Coach. through Maidenhead, Reading, Newlinry, 1 ougerford, Rains bury, and Aldhourn. Driven through with One Coachman only. The nearest convey'ance to Lambouru, Porton, Woot ton Basset, and Pewsey. NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE nod ANDER LINE Coaches every morning and afternoon. Only One Night on the road. PIAMOUTH. " Sovereign," New light fast Coach, to Fal mouth, Intro, Bodmin, Pettryn, Ashburton, Totness, and Newton Abbidt, every morning at 7. RAMSGATE " Royal Telegraph," New superior fast safe Coach, to Margate, Dover, Deal, Broadstairs, Canterbury, Feversham, and Sandwich —every Morning. at half-past 7. 7 - In consequence of the decided preference given to the Te legraph safe Coach, . the Proprietors are determined HO expence shall be spared to render it the drat conveyance on the Kent Road. SHEFFIELD " Express," and also " The Rockingkam," through Rotherham, New Four inside Post Coaches, every morning and afternoon. SHREWSBURY, Wellington, and Shilfnal, Light Post. Coaches, every morning and afternoon.---Gu/riled. SOUTHAMPTON " Union," to Lymington, Lyndhurst, Winchester, Basingstoke Hart ford Bridge, Black water, and Bagshot, New Four Insi de Coach, every morning, and ar rives at the Coach and Horses and Vine Inn, South:unit. ton, by Five. This is a most delightful Conveyance to the Isle of Wight, Jersey, Guernsey, St. Maloes, Havre de Grace, CherbOnigh, &c.—The. Proprietors of the above Coach hope to receive a continuance of that support which has hitherto been experienced sincettlie oommeticerarot of the " Union." a new light very fast S TAFFORDSHIRE porrEtuF,S, S Coach, every afternoon, Lanend. Stoke, helton, Hoiden), Tunstall, Lawton, Rattly and Holmes Chapel. This is the . only Coach direct to the Potteries. STAMFORD light Post Coaches every morning and after noon, through Baldock. Biggleswarle, St. Newts, Buckden. Alconhury, Stilton, and Wandsford. SUNDERLAND, Stockton, and Tartu Light Post Coat)) - case, was resumed. The adjourned hearing of this long, and now very heavy Mr: OttNo, for the defendant, and Mr. HEAT" for the cengregation, exhorred the Court at considerable length not to grant the injunction, because there was no contract on the part of Mr. Fletcher to obey the Synod which could be found in the deed ; and becatise, if there had been, it was admitted on the , other side that the Synod could have no authority over the de pendedanti by funds of majority l, of the congregation ; the application of which expressly conse quence, as there was no question of property, so there could be none in the case which would admit of the Court's jurisdiction being exercised. The Sommon-GtrzEnar, was partly heard in reply, and contended for the exercise of the jurisdiction upon the contract implied by the deed, by the usage, and by common apprehen sion, under which Mr. Fletcher had bound himself, when tak ing on him the administration of the chapel, implicitly to obey the Synod. He argued that the new nature of the fact which had been assumed as a reason why the Court should not inter fere, was no reason at all. There was as much reason in re straining a man from preaching in a particular pulpit against' his own contract, as there was in restraining thellarnmerstnith bell from ringing, because th e c h ur chwardens had contractetl with Lady Arabella Howard not to ring it to the distraction of thatgentlewoman's tender nerves, at 3 o'clock on every morn ing. On another occasion the Court had ordered Mr. George Colman not to write plays for Covent.gsrtlen, because he had contracted to write for the Haymarket. O n another occasion the Court had restrained a man from selling lemonade and other refreshments to the frequ enters of Vnuiltall, because of his contract not to do so. There was nothing which .could be devised or thought of which might not become incident in suits of this kind, quite consistently with the most undisputed branch of equity jurisdiction. The law of patents teemed with these cases, which would be all got rid of by the ridicule and affected surprise of his learned friends that a court of equity should be troubled with such strange matters. The LORD CHANCELLOR, by repeated interference in the course of the pleadings, signified ins doubts—first, whether, supposing the matter of accusation against Mr. Fletcher being Node out " malverse of conversation." according to the rules and constitution of the Scotch Synod (and of those rules and constitutions his Lordship had not the slightest evidence before him); and, secondly, it a breach of promise of marriage did amount to that offence, and was censurable by susnenSion or otherwise, whether the Court would lend its jurisdiction to en force such a trust ? Another doubt which pressed his Lordship's inind was of a more direct nature. He was clearly of opinion that the proper application of the chapel funds was in . the discre tion of the majority of the congregation. If he enjoined Mr. Fletcher from preaching, the congregation might withhold their supplies to any other Minister appointed by the Synod. To comply with the petition, he must direct Mr. Fletcher not to enter the pulpit ; and the very next day there would be end of the congregation and of all the receipts and profiti, which; if the injunction were properly granted, ought to be received for the new Minister of the Synod. Was there ever an instance of the Court executing a trust where the decree might be instantly rendered null and void by the will of one of the parties, and no redress to be had afterwards ?—Further hearing this day. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Nov. 22. DoLny AND ANOTHER V. LOWNDES. Mr. AGAR, during the pause occasioned by the Vice-Chan cellor's rising to quit the Court, said that the bill in this cause was now amended in the manner suggested to him by the Court on Saturday, and that he would therefore now take the injunc tion he bad then prayed, to restrain the defendant from publish ing the comedy of A Woman. never Vext ; or, the Widow If Cornhill. Mr. Lowndes addressed his Honour and said, that he had received no notice of the application which had been made to He had therefore ** the motion, and as the n Court unab tol b e u t through instruct ( t. the n p suebl to o c j o o p u r r o n : l e his Honour was of opinion that it ought now to go on, he must crave the indulgence of being heard to argue his own case in ,person. Then V IC E . CitaxcEtto explained to Lowndes, that motions prayinglor the injunction of the C ourt were a l ways, by the long-continued practice in Chancery, m a d e ex - parte , an d g i rantedt wasthen on the for a Lil l e d a v d i e t i s e o n f d a t n h t parties who app li e d for them. s to move th at t h e i n j unctions should be dissolved, and upon this latte r motion the merits of the case were argued. When that time should arrive in Air. Lowndes's case, he might be heard in person if he th oug h t f it ; but at present the injunction must be granted. 111 r. Lowndes then .withdrew, and the business of the Court, which had been suspended during this conversation, proceeded. COURT OF KING'S . BENCH, NOY. 22. TUE KING v. TUE MAYOR AND STEWARD OF WEST LOO. The ATTORN E Y-0 1: NERAL moved fora rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding the Mayor and Steward of the borough and manor of West Loo, in Cornwall, to bold a court-feet for the purpose of swearing cer tain residents as freemen. On former occaain ns , a power of swearing in strangers as freemen had been asserted, but it had been overthrown in a Committee of the H ou „ o f C om mons and there were now persons entitled to vote as residents, who had not beta sworn.—The Coulyr granted a rule to show Cause. TUE ZINO, ON TIIE PROSECUTION OP Tilt nAncittis or Mr. SC,l4lllll.4F.Bll:lll4muofivetyl. rude 'r on t lES he proprietor and printer of the S un day Time: to low cause why a criminal THE KING, ON THE PROSECUTION OF TILE REV. WM. CECIL, V. CHARLES MADRYLL ESQ. Mr. ROBINSON moved for the judgment of the Court on the defendant, who was convicted of a misdemeanour at the last Cambridge assizes. The second count of the indictment, uron which alone the defendant was found guilty, charged him with havin, on the 25th of December, 18'23, at the parish of Papworth Lverard, in the county of Cambridge, in the church and church-yard of the parish, unlawfully, willfully, and con temptuously interrupted, hindered, and obstructed the Rev. Wm. Cecil, the clergyman, in reading the order for the burial of the dead,-and interring a corpse; and with having, in the said church, by threats and menaces, prevented and hindered the burial of the corpse according to the rites and ceremonies of the Church of England. The other count alleged the lay ing of violent hands upon two men in the church-yard; but these were negatived by the Jury. Mr. Justice LITT LEDALE read the report disclosing the evi. denee which was published at the time of the trial. • Mr. SCARLETT rose. It was the anxious desire of the de. fendant to place the whole of his conduct before the Court, and show that he was incapable of acting in the manner imputed to him ; for this purpose he had many affidavits; but as he (Mr. Searlett) intended to move in arrest of judgment, it would not • be correct to put in these affidavits at present. The Loan Cum? JusTict: said, the motion should have been made before the report was read. ' Alr. SCARLET T expressed his regret that he hail not sub pitted his motion earlier, and then proceeded to state the grounds on which it rested. The defendant had been con victed' on the second count only, which stated no assault, and did not allege that the clergyman was acting in the exe cution of his duty. It then merely asserted that the defendant, by menaces and threats, prevented the burial of a corpse in the church or churchyard, which a clergyman would have interred according to the rites and ceremonies of the Church of Eng land. Now, if it was possible that all which an indictment alleged to be done might be innocently done, there was no ; charge of crime, and consequently no judgment could be given. There were many cases in which a man might lawfully, by me naces and threats, prevent a clergyman from burying a corpse. Suppose, for example, a number of Jews were carrying the I body of one of their nation to be interred at the synagogue, ac. cording to their law, and an over zealous clergyman should in sist on conveying it to the church, and performing Christian burial over it, would the Jews be criminal for threatening the zealot and his sexton with legal consequences in case of their persisting ; or would it be a crime if they so obstructed the intended performance of the funeral ? Suppose, again, the ex ecutors of a deceased person had determined on burying the testator at a certain time and place, and a clergyman should insist on burying him at another time and in another church. yard, would they be criminal in explaining to him the illega lity of his design, and in preventing its execution by menaces ? Other circumstances might easily be imagined under which it would be right and lawful to prevent, by mere threats, the in. terment of a corpse which a clergyman officiously proposed to bury. If, therefore, all the allegations in the count upon which the verdict proceeded were consistent with an entire Absence of moral and legal guilt, the judgment ought to be arrested. The COURT, after a short consultation, granted a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be arrested. TIIE KING V. WATSON AND BLISS. This was an indictment preferred by William Man against the defendants, tradesmen of fiethnel.Green, for an assault. The case was tried before the Lord Chief Justice at the last Middlesex Sittings, when the defendants were found guilty. It appeared to be the practice for th e f r i en d s o f M r . rutton, the vestry-clerk of Bethnel-green, to celebrate his rks. n T a he la se rg p e e n rso ut n n s be w r , o ,re f a p d e i rso nit n tea s by by a t n ic e k x e h ts i : ejection by a dinner at the Commerci a l I nn , H ac k ney, an d afterwards bitk)n ofii fireworks. w o each of which gave a right of entrance to two, and which were issued by the stewards. At the last anniversary, Mr. Man, who was of the adverse f a ction, w en t w i t h a friend to see the fire -works, but was thrust nut by the defendants, and posited in the face by Mr. Watson. Mr. Man's friend was soppily(' with a ticket, but it did not appear that the defendants saw it till the assault was over. Mr. SCAILLETT now moved for the judgment of the Court; but offered to forbear, if the parties would go before the Master with a view to payment of costs. Mr. TIROUGnAM, for the defendant Watson, was ready to express his client's contrition; but thought it unreasonable that he should be required to pay the costs of an indictment which should have been prefered at sessions. Affidavits were then put in on the ?arta the defendants, al leging t h a t If they had known or believed the prosecutor had a ticket, they would not have attempted to remove him. Mr. Buouotiast then addressed the Court for Watson, Mi. Pit 11.1.114 for Miss, and Mr. SCAIII.ETT for the prosecution. M r . J us tice Bayt,Ev, after expressing his regret that a cele bration tending tokeep alive animosities in Bethnal-green should continue, passed the sentence of the Court, that Watson should pay a tine of 301., and Bliss a fine of 101. TEE RING, ON THE VROSECUTION OF JOSEPII CROW, V. THOMAS NEWMAN. Mr. K ELL Y , moved for the judgment of the Court on this defendant, the landlord of the Green Man at Barnet, who was convicted at the last Middlesex sittings, of an assault on the prosecutor, a waiter in his service. It appeared at the trial that the prosecutor had placed a cane left at the inn by Lord Egremont in a closet, and that his master complaining of the waiter for not tonging it to the bar, struck him on the side, and used considerable violence. Affidavits, in some respects contradictory, were now produced its to the provocation, the assault itself, and the nature of the GILES V. GILES. This was a suit for divorce by reason of adultery, promoted by Sarah Giles against her husband, J. P. Giles, Esq. of Wal. cot, in Somerset. The libel contained 19 articles, to which a number of witnesses bad been examined, pleading the marriage of the parties on the 13th January, 1 8021, the subsequent cola:- bition ' and the birth of flour children, one of whom was dead.— Fromther commencement of the year 1821, Mr. Giles carried on an adulterous intercourse with divers women, particularly with. two petisonti l one of whom was a prostitute, and the other, Sally Wheeler, his female domestic, until Mrs. G. quitted her hus band's house, in January, 1022. On various occasions he took improper familiarities with S. Wheeler ; upon Mrs. G. remon strating with him he would reply that she (Sally Wheeler) was snore than a wife to hint. He would, after dinner, make Sally Wheeler sit down and partake of some wine and fruit, from, which familiarities she ashumed a consequence in the house unbecoming that of a servant, and painful to Mrs. G. ; the lat: der, on one occasion requested her to, quit the house which she refused, saying, she was servant to Mr. Giles and not to Mrs.. Giles ; and, on requesting Mr. Giles to part with Sally Wheeler, he refused, and told her she might leave the house, and take Fanny (one of the children),. but he would not pan from his- Sally, (meaning Sally Wheeler,) at the same time, in the pre sence of Mrs. G., he put his arms round Sally Wheeler's waist. Mr. Giles then left Bath with Sally Wheeler, and they were traced to various places, where they cohabited together as man and wife. Sir Jour; Nrcuor. said, enough had certainly been proved to grant the prayer of Mrs. Giles. The divorce was therefore decreed. MAYOR'S COURT, Nov. 2!. TilE COLOMBIAN GOVEIINMENT.-4101PION V. JOSE DI: SAN MARTIN AND OTHERS. Mr. BOLLAND, in moving that common bail be filed in dis c solution of the attachment in this case, stated, that it was Am. Action brought by Mr. Hodson against the defendants, lately err now styling themselves the Government of Peru. It would be recollected, that seine time ago an affidavit had been put into Court from Air. llodson, statinq, that the above-named defend ants had incurred a debt with him to the amount of 3 1 0901., for the payment of which he considered them responsible as the Government of Peru. The Learned Counsel here proposed to read the affidavit, when Mr. BARNARD, who was for the other side, said, that he was ready to argue in the event of the production of any particular affidavit in denial of the debt, but he considered that the timer affidavit had already been disposed of by being withdrawn. Mr. Bow.axn said, his object was to put clown the non sense that was dinned into the cars of the public, upon the subject of the responsibility of the Government of Peru tot debt to an individual. lie was perfectly aware that the thing was got up to tell upon the Stock Exchange. The use he intended to make of the affidavit was, to show that the money Mr. Hod• - son lately claimed from Messrs. Jose d'Ariva Aguerro, Jose de Torres Tagle, and Jose de San Martin, as the Government of 'Peru, and winch was attached in the hands of Illessrs. Baring, Messrs., Kinder, and Messrs. Fry anti Chapman, was now claimed from Jose San Martin and the others, as individuals, and not as a Government. The amount sought was tbr menu factored goods. Mr. BARNARD objected to the use of the affidavit, upon the ground that the Court had already ruled that it was insufficient for authorizing an attachment of the property. Mr. 80w...am contended that he was at liberty to make use of what the plaintiff had sworn against him. The itzconoun certainly thought Mr. Rolland might use what had been sworn to by Mr. Hodson on the former occasion. Mr. Dot:Latin then read the affidavit of the 'daintier, hi which he swore to the debt, as due from the Government of Peru. tie then submitted to the Court that no such Govern ment could be recognized, the highest authority having stated to that effect; that the defendants could not be sued as it go. vernment ; and, finally, that the affidavit, or rather that which pretended to be an affidavit, was, in fact,'no affidavit at all. '['he ittconnEn asked whether the affidavit had not been regularly sworn ? Mr. BoLLANn replied, that it had been sworn merely before one of the clerks in the Mayor's Court, and of course was not an instrument upon which, if it contained a false statement, an indictment for purjury could be founded. The ItEcoanta.—Who is this clerk ?—to what attorney of the Court is he clerk ?—for 1 shall take care that practices of this kind shall not be tolerated. His Lordship was here informed that it had been a practice of the Mayor's Court Office for many years to permit the clerks to swear persons. Business was greatly facilitated by sucit means. C RECORDER desired that he should never again heat of this mode of swearing affidavits- 'flit:did, he should certainly adopt summary means of preventing the p ract i ce. One of the attornies said it had been the practice ever since he belonged to the office, and that was 26 years. The ItEconntat said, he hoped his observation on the sub ject would be taken as a sufficient notice, and that there would be no repetition of the practice. His Lonnati IP then granted the motion to Mr. Dollar* by which the attachment becomes wholly null and void. did this uport the ground of the insufficiency of the affidavit; stat ing, at the same time, that if a proper affidavit had been tiled, he should have given his opinion - of the Iwo other objections, but that was now quite unneceisary.