The Sun. — London, England, 1815-06-07 00:00:00

1M PE MAL P A-AIENT. IIOUSE•OF LORDS, 'rbtsnAlsr, JOVE t. SI: .3 . . Grab.ain brought u 4) the Stamp Duties Bill, thetale- Ai / l o nian Asylum, the White :Herring .. Fishery 13 ill, &c. from . the Whieb wereyt;ade. first time. The Northern Light HMIs& Rill `-and the Exchequer fills Funding- Bill were.read a third time and passed. The third reading . orthe Pillory. Bill was postponed from Thurs.i to 'Thursday se'snsights LORD DARNLEY'S MOTION. The !Inrquis of LANSDOWN stated on the part of his No'ole vait)Se inOtit'brt stood for that night, that he was • ion touch ioditi.osed to attend in his place, and thatbe re- - gretted that thir,Lordships bad thus fruitlessly been sum . ltlunell on 0., favasion.' The African Trade Bill, the East India Goods Itegulatiost 13'01, the Ketch Judges Salary fill, and the Ulacltruannan Jail Bill, were read a second time, and ordered to he committed: PETITIONS_AGAINS3 THE CORN BILL. Earl sTANIIOVE pi esested Petition from Stilling, pray for the repeal of - tht Gent Bill. ,-- Lord B.KIII , .SDAI.E, ;Itivertincrto the language in which the POition was couched; (fir' etded thzrtit was insalting to their Lordship, and moved that it should be rejected: After some dbfertssi;:in between the two Noble Lords, a dirt= Slots took place— , • For the receptiiity of the Petition toutoits S- Proxies • 5 10 Against it Contents 9 —l- 1 1 oxies ....11 20 Majority to 'the Petition was c on sequently rejected. The Marquis of IYOUGLAS presented Petitiopt on the same 'object from the Borough of ltutberglen, from the Corpora tion of Masons in the said Borough, from the Borough , of - Johnstone, from the East. District of the Barony of Glasgow, and from Strathblain, in the Comity of Stirling. Those from the Corporation of Masons of Itutherglen, and from the Bo rough ulJuhnstone were received. The rejection of the others • was moved liy Viscount Melville, in conseqnenee of the terms in which they were expressed , and after a long and desul6 tory conversation, in which the Marquis of DOuglas, Viscount • Melville, the Marquis of lAnstiown,lEarl stanhope, the Earl , of Lauderdale, Lor.l Rotbes, and the-Eari of Carnarvon par ticipated, they were rejected accordingly.—Adjourned. TIOUSE OF CONIMONS. - - . Mr. Frankland Leith .bronzht r.p the Report of the mom mittre on the Assize of Pread.--ordered to lie on-the Ta- Isle.—bord Nelson's Estate hill was read a third time and gassed.—The Naval Timber Bill was read a third time and passed. SALARIES OF CONSTABLES IN IRELAND. `Mr. lier.;E rose, pursuant to his notice, to. Move for -leave to, bring in a Bill to enable the Graud %ivies in Ireland to allow larger Salaries to the ConStahles. The sum which the Grand. Juries was at present empowered to grant, was only 81. a year, a sum too small to procure the services of men who were fit for the situation, which was one of great importance in the preservation of the peace of that country. There were two otherob jects which he wished to include in this Bill, one was to enable Grand Juries, with the consent of th►e Lord Lieutenant, to grant a superanuation to old Constables, who had, for a certain number of years, faithfully and diligently performed their duty ; and the uther• was to empower the Grand Juries to present for the necessary sums for re moving convicts, from the goals in Ireland. After a few words from Sir C. MONK and Mr. CALCRAFT, the motion was agreed to. Mr.PF.ELE then moved,that the Art of 4I George Sd:he read, Which being done, the House resolved itself into a Committee on the said Act. • M ASTER OF THE, ROLLS IN IRELAND. . Mr. PEELE proceeded to state to the Committee time ground upon which he meant to propose an .increase of the salary of the Master of the Rolls in Ireland, and of the sum to be allowed to him on his retirement. He proposed to add 8001. a year to the salary, which being now 35001. would make 43001. a'-year, and to add 6001. a, , year to the sum allowed. to the Master 'of the, Rolls on his re tirement, which being. : now 27001. would make it 33001. a-year. In the. last Session of Parliament a Bill passed that House to increase the Pension to the Master of the 'Lolls,-on his retirement, 6001 a-year, which, was the sum now proposed 5 • but no increase was matte to the salary. So that in fact the sum granted upon the retirement would bare been nearly equal to the full salary. This ar rangement , upon consideration, appeared to him so improper that he withdreo that Bill; but the flouse . then fatly sanctioned the measure of increasing the retirement to the Master of the Rolls to the amount now proposed. The present salary of the Master of the Rolls in Ireland was fixed in 1801 since that time the salaries of the Puisne Judges • in irelaod had been increased, and put upon a footing with those .of England. The.office of Master of the Rolls was next in point of dignity to the Chief Justice of the King's Bench; it was superior in rank to the Chief Justice of the Com mon Pleas and the Chief Baron of the Exchequer. In determining the amount of the increase of sa . Jury there were two principles upon which lie might proceed, either to put the Master of the Rolls in Ireland upon a footing with the, Master of the Rolls in England, making allowance for the lncritire Tax, which was paid by the latter, or he might increase the salary to make it bear the sarue proportion to the salaries of. the Irish Puisne Judges that it, did .before their sala ries were raised. But whichever principle •be alopted, the result would be the same, viz. that the_anginentation would be 8001. The pro position which he was now making had the ap probation both of the late and present Chancet i.:rs of Ireland, though he was aware that -he could not urg e that circumstance as a reason' to utduce the ommittee. Before he concluded, he thought himself bound in justice to state, that the • preSent Master of the Rolls in Ireland had uni forndy discharged the duties of his office in a man, tier %ila!' gave, the highest satisfaction to the suitors iu -his court, arid to the bar. He then m oved the Resolution. Mr. ABgRCRONIBIE apprehended that by this. regulation th e silary of the Mater of the Ruth in Ireland would be w d e greater than that of the same Officer for Englund; the latter being, he believed, only 400 p 1. a year, with a house. 'lnc business also dune by each of these Officers bore- no co mparison, as much more labour Was performed by -the :'‘laiter in England. He- therefore thought the subject re quired much cunsideratiutt,.:as the increase appeared in the light of a rellininary to the removal -of the O ff icer in • question, PEELE, ia. explanation ,. denied t h e last inference which the flon. Gentleman had drawn. He added that the 2.1.43ter of the Rolls in Iretand was su-I , .frcted, to the Income 'fax, from nßich that ()nicer in England was exempt. Mr. HORNER decidedly pro,tzsted 'against the measure, on all the. grounds urged by Mr. Abercrombie. Ile thought when the Irish Judges came year after year for an increase of tht suhjkiet required [Wire attention, in such times as th , '''ittnt‘4 the IL>tise app:.areddivosed to g; re to it.—lt was ri tiAd. precedent. • Perhiras ) ass; ! 1 t , r year the Lord Chancel la.lreland might lie h ' ronglit3%,rwa - rd as an object for an •• Ca - se , dhay, by the \ln' ter of the Rolls. Mc. MILLE aid Mr.IIORNE.K explAilL $ iedwith souse &Kau Mr. Wrii'fl3a2,,l said a few words.in defence of the re marks of Mr. corner ; denyieg thit he tetld mean to threw any perSonalimputation Cu the individuals sn question• Mr. LOCKHAWI' tholglit this measure might lead to a burthen on tile country. by inducing Masters of the Rolls to fetire, Tbe last person who held this situation had not rea tired from 01 health. But be had a still more serious objera iiyl to it, - as such gtauts, .so sepeatedly• and easily wads ) te:ltled to render the great Law-officers more 'dependant on the Crown than they otherwise would be. Forthese reasons he felt a considerable repugnance to - such frequent applica tions: he was uot, however, inclined to oppose the preseelt grant. Mr, ABERCROMBIE said the House ought to he in pos session cif some documents to show the necessity of this in- crease.. . The-q Yestion was then pet and carried, and the Report was ordered to he received tu-morrow. Mr. JOHNSON presented certain Accounts relative to Fines in Ireland. WOOL TRADE. Mr. WESTI.RN, after rations observations, moved for a Committee to topsider of the Acts imposing Duties on Dtitish WOollsold bv auction. .- Mr. FRANKLAND LEWIS seconded the moti(.o, and ar4 gned that whatever was practicable should be - dime for the farmers. The Corn Bill had dot cured the constantly in creasing calamities which affected the agricultural interest. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER admitted that A revision of this'matter was desirable, but the ptesent pro position might be dangerous. It might be advisable to try an experitu,•nt on a small scale,-such as t aking I instead of 5 per cent: He agreed in 'the propriety of encouraging the growth of our owli wool: Mr. I). GIDDY supported the motion. Sir H . PARNELL appioved of the objett fOle motion, 'but recommended the Ail tOrawing it far the pr,sent. Mr, J. P. GRANT and Mr. H. SUM NER Supported the motion. • , . Lord LASCELLES hoped that the • present proceedings, even if the motion Were withdrawn, would serve as a notice to wool-staplers and others that a metiAti - e. would he intro duced next session. Mr. ROSE rectomnended the withdrawing of the Motion. Mr. WESTERN was unwilling - to withdraw the motion, but had no objection to modify it: The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that he should not nbject if the Bill were limited only to the reduc tion of the duty for the present.. - • This proposition was assented to, and the House resolved itself into the Committee. The Report being be-ling - lit up, leave was given to bring in a Bill to reduce the duty upon,_ Wool, the growth of the. United Kingdom. - - BEGGARS IN LONDON: Mr. ROSE gave notice, that on Thursday he would move fer a Committee tin the state of Nlemlicity in the Nletropolis. His object Was only to Ening in the 13ilIYor eonsidcratiun.• NEW TAXES.—SINKING FUND. Mrt TIERNEY enquired whether ir was in the contempla tion et the Right Hon. Gentleman to propose any new mea sures of finance, in the. place st those taxes which had been abandoned. The Stamp Duties had not yet been brought be fore Parliament, but _he under tood that there were altera tions, and that. their original amount was calculated at 800,0001. The Wine Tax was withdrawn, and be understood that the Tobaceo and new Customs and Excise Duties were estimated_ at 1,600,0001. Had the Right Hon. Gentleman no farther ways and means of meeting the ditticuities of the pre sent crisis ? The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER; in a low tone of voice, observed, that the Right Hon. Gentleman had ac curately stated the original estimated produce of the New Taxes which bad not been abandoned. The Stamp Duties, however, had been newly modified, and were now estimated at 1,000,0001. For whatever deficiency might arise in the Ways and Means already before Parliament, it was the in tention of his Majesty's Government to propose resorting to the stock now in the hands s-i the public Counnisioners. Mr. GRENFELL gave notice of a motion on the subject of the public balances deposited in the -Bank of England. DEBTS OF THE PRINCE REGENT. -Mr. BENNET asked, whether the Noble Lord had any ob jection now to state the amount of the Debts of the Prince Regent Lord CASTLEREAGH said, that up to the 20th of May there remained 339,0001. undischarged against . his Royal Highness. Mr. TIE.RNEY asked whether it would not be infinitely moie - to the credit of the country for the House to take the whole subject into its own hands, instead of obliging the Prince Regent• to resort, Session after Session, to Parlia ment ? It would be a great deal more fair and manly to give the creditors some security, and to relieve his Royal High ue.iis from embarrassment. After a few words from Mr. HoKurd, Mr. H. Addington obtainaleare to bring in a Bill to amend the Laws relating to Transportation. . Mr.TIERNhY asked, When the Treaty with Holland would be laid on the table ? Lord CASTLEREAGH said--Tomorrow. COTTON APPRENTICE BILL. - - Sir R.. PEELE, on rising to wove for leave to bring in a Bill to amend the Act relative to the Apprentices of Cotton Manufacturers, observed that his prin cipal object was to benefit the health of the children. it had been the. custom to take children at a very early period of life, before they were able to attend many bouts to any sort of business without injury to their health. He would propose to restrict the a4.e of children adulated to ten years ur upwards, and to extend the benefit uf the Act to children already apprenticed, as well as to those not yet bound. He should also propose, that their daily time at lab Our shout , ' not exceed twelve hours and a halt in each day, inc!udia the .time for refreshment and education, which would reduce the actual time of their labour to ten hours and . a half. No injury vviitil;la;lseto the masters from this regulation, as the business was not a labour of 'hardship, hut a labou r ' o f du ration, and-the length of time the children were employed in most manufaCtories seriously injured their health. He had a remarkable proof of the advantage of such a 'regulation in his own establishment, where the average mortality did not ex ceed one in a hundred, which was considerably less than the diminution of human life by any other employment. He should also propose that the persons who teach the children should be properly paid by order of the :11agistrates, and that inspectors be appointed by them, to be also remunerated. — As the Bill was of immense importance, he wished it to be read a first time and printed, in order to be perfected next Session, and he wished it -to be understood that' the Bill would provide against its being legal for any young persons, to be apprenticed after this notice. The Hon. Baronet then made his motion. Mr. W. Smith highly approved the Bill, hut wished it had been introduced earlier, so as to be enacted this Se ss i on .. Mr. HORNER thought all such Bills as this w ere no bet ter than palliatives. The root of tliC evil was the removal of parish children to distant manyiactories. This was an outrage to humanity which the law should not permit.— Such was the extent of abuse and atrocity to which this treatment of. parish children was carried, that in the, case of , a cotton-manufactufer, who some time since be came a bankrupt, whole gangs of children were advertised and disposed of among his effects. In another case before the King's Bench, some children of this description were found in a state of famine, and saved from starving by the humanity of some persons whose notice was attracted to them. It appeared before a Committee up stairs, that a bargain wits made between a London parish and a Lancashire manutac-. turer for the removal of these unhappy children, one condi tion of which was, that with every tei sound children, he should take one idea. He was ready to admit that-the abuse was accidental, but the possibility of its existeace should be prevented by Parliament. Mr. PHILLIPS stated, that in consequence of recent alte . rations, the dumber of apprentices under ten years old was greatly reduced, .and that he found on inquiry the state of health in the manufactories to be as good as in anv other suit of employment. • , Mr. H. SUMNER suggested a short Bill in chi present Session, with a view to obtain full iuforMation before the next Session. • After a few words from Sir R. Peek, and Mr. Rose s leave was given. Sir It. PEELE subsequently brought in the had it read a first time, and ordered to be printed and read a second time on that day se'nnight. Mr. HORNER presented two Petitions from the Debtors confined in the King's Bench and Marsholsea Prisoms,,against the pending Insolvent Debtor's pill, which was ordered to lie un the table. Mr. GORDON asked, whether the Post Office Bill was to be brought on that night, and at what trout.? • .! The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, he wish ed hest to dispose of the other orders, but that if they. took. up the time till ten o'clock, it was his intention to postpone the Post Office Bill. EAST • INDIA SHIPPING BILL. . . The Order of the Day for a CouTnltee on the, India Shipping VAL hav , ing been read,' Alderman ATKINS rose td-oppose . the.Speaker's leaving . the Chair. 1-le conceived, that the etTect of this nig, would. 1e to transfer ship-bitiliting P front the Kivet"rharnes to India. In such cage, what were to become of the great establishments on the Thames, aod of the thousands of ship wrights and arthatiS employed there I much the greater proportion of the large ships, formerly built in the River Thames, were intended to be employed in the commerce of India bin if the Company, besides their monopoly of the trade to China, were permitted to carry on all that trade in India-built ships, he conceived the business of ship-building in the Thames, and the immense establishments existing for that purpose, would - be completely annihilated. Since the Company bad begun to build ships in India, the number built in the Thames .did not exceed two in a year ) . whereas it formerly amounted to seven. Inde pendent of ,the other advantages of the trade of ship-building centering in this country, it should be recollected that in very critical times, when the Navies of France, Spain, and Holland were coalesced against this country, no less than four teen large ludiamen, many of Which were brought into the line, were transferred to the service , of Government. This could never , hive taken place if the docks for building those ships bad then ' been in India, instead of England. Incase of a long peace following the present war, how .tvcre the numbers of men now employed at the dock ; yards to find work, if the commercial mat ine should not be able to find employment for those ho were no longer iiccessary to our military ? Mr. WALLACE conceived that the obtect of this 8 . 11 had been very generally misunderstood. It was rather extraordinary that the ship-builders, in their petition against it, still stated the ill con sequences which would result front ships being entitled to all the advantages of a British register, when they had, by their depu ties, several conferences with Ministers upon the subject, and could not avoid knowing, that one of the objects of this Bill was to prevent the sale of Such ships, or their being admitted in the - ge neral competition of trade. So tar front giving India-built ships the full. tolvantage of a British register, this was a restraining Bill, which did not permit them to be employed in any other trade but that of India, and from India to this country. it had been said, that this would be a breach of the spirit of the Navigation Act : that Act, however, had been originally intended for the encouragement of our commerce and_our sea- Well,. much more than to encourage the trade of althOugh this trade flourished, as was naturally to be expected, in the general pros perity of our commerce. The Navigation Act was, however, never at any time so construed as, under the words British-built - ships, to exclude the ships which were built in our Colonies. In deed, the very words of it mentioned the territo ries in possession of his Majesty. It was perfectly. well known, that when. America was in the situa tion of a Colony, American-built ships were not considered as . excluded by the Navigation Act from the advantages given to British ships. He • would now ask,' upon what Principle of justice were the Americans, and every nation in amity with us, to have the advantages in this trade, which were to be-denied to British India ? With respect to what had been said - 'as to the state of destitution of the yards, he was convinced that it was not occasioned by the East India ship ping, but by the want of that employment which Government had afforded them during the war, and also by their own improvidence, in driving away every species of shipping except the most expensive. It was from that improvidence, there fore, that they now resisted the Bill, and sought an indemnity at the expence of the East India Company. The number of shipwrights was stat ed at about 4,000, but as they were chiefly em ployed in repairs, nearly tour-fifths of their trade would remain, if they had neither the Gtivern ment; nor the East India Company ; and there fore, it could not be said that their. ruin would be effected by the introduction of the Bill. The East India Company had at ptesent 30 ships, which must shortly be replaced in some way or other, and no doubt could be entertained that a great proportion of them would be built in this coun try. From many circumstances, indeed, they could be built much cheaper here than in India.-- In some parts there was a difficulty in procuring wood, and a sufficient number of shipwrights could not be found ; and it was not to be supposed that -a trade, which an Englishman was seven years in learning, could be acquired by an Indian i n o ne year. It had been urged, that no advan tages would accrue to this country from building ships in India ; - but the very reverse, was the truth, as one third of .the materials must be - sent . from England. In India, they had never been able to make iron applicable to the purposes of ship building : they had no copper at all ; 'and in regard to cauvas,.Mr. Horner had said that he would not suffer a ship to come. round the Cape without English sails. In 1801, Lord Wellesley bad expressed an. opinion, that we should derive very considerable advantages from India built shypiog, and it was perfectly clear, that if we would avail ourselves of those advantages, we a-sise),gic.rozionl:.‘telit,te(nlyb in notnor oakbe wished this t h c a o t u there should make this country the universal emporium practical security owf4tsraadieu; e i v t i v le h r i t i c c e h , v‘ t . l a t s at - r n ec ot li o si n t e t e but fourth t t p a 4 d r % e v e: for the Navy atone. Besides, the price of oak was four times as much - as it was 20 years ago, • notwithstanding the facility Mr. ' M considered that India was ex empt from all the restrictions to whiCh the other Colonies of England were subjected. She bought wherever she found it cheapest, and sold where ' ever she could do it with most advantage. The natives of India were unable to support the ;hard ships of our northern climates, and therefore - could_.be of no use to our navy. He thought that those wh o were not subjected to colonial restric tions, should not be entitled to colonial privi ~-leges• He contended that the price of oak had hardly doubled in 60 years. Ha smaller quantity .1. .appeared . th roug h out t h e cou ntry than in former times, the demand had also become less. Our ancestors used oak in building their houses, and lor.many other objects, in which a different kind of wood was now employed. The quantity, though I diminished, was therefore still sufficient for • ship building. Was tree, as had Inca said, that eren should the measure - be carried, In 1 3 di, bad n 6 ° Can t of availing herself ()fit what7would be the.ti.eb:t and should the passing the 11;11 ?: B' 1 . 1 t Ind ia • B u t t i e thong ) the means, b_ e e adopted, a-capital of twenty-two millions "a to !? taken away from England and:Aransferre _. ourlndia. seamen were Here, we must either bring-,,0r ships si. to our seamen, or send oar seamen tc'elici., :iia,td °t f ld dentsups. Would not this be increasing tb e ti do . which might happen to either, a nd leil'r! le a Bering the existence of our navy ? Mr ' ""lon's . tiv e Hasti ngs stlie in India by a thread, which the breath- of P Li , Opinion might destroy. We had tang ht the o t t l ict us, that we held our posses 3 bo ' at igta , them how. to build navies.. He thong we r 0 ,... not - to place. those means at the disposal„,l% Sole sessions so distant and so precarious. 'SY i n to tile sentiments he should vote against going at.- b Committee. , o f ottr Mi. F ri ‘vitr , and were now to itiStl . -ED- DOUGLAS ritliCUlect the ioea ~ one teaching other countries the art o f shirt„l',(l '''' which was no mystery, and defended the L'l'•be, . Sir CHAs• MoNcit hoped, atter all the postrtio, Co e : L c r l e u a t s l co:11 reasons i i t i l l ents that had taken place, and the eiden;eeniea .‘ d b e en produced, that the a uthors ot thi s . t. ..... sure would have been induced to wili“.ll.`°tliolo gt the then entered at length into a" examitia,;,. a tid which oi)i,o l s e i t i l ig hi t it t l ie to c t c l i i i c i t ti tt e. it ituprop,... I , bad ( t i t r i 4 e l GliteNutquieNr:e supportedopposite rile v i e n d e Is' A tti e e . ' re i y lS t i r l i t e i di r t , recourse hail been occasionally had ( 0 t he ' b e y chant-yards in the river Thames, but not that b t e , ought to be always employed. it wou ld ~,i monstrous proposition to maintain that the..-..., of E ng land should depend ofd few arblill 1" in the River. 0 5 Mr. MARRY Aar opposed the measur-e; he n ot willing that timber should he_imported, bat ~..3 shil3s-41te material, but o.ot the mantitactto article. The House then divided, . . 1 For going into the_ Committee •..... • • • • • • • 5 Against it ...................... .•• • • 93 0 'Majority ...... • • . to The House , - havina then fesolved itself in „Jo. z., Committee, ,the different Clauses went thrair.;,,t and several new ones were .proposed and afir e to. The Report was received, read, 0 11 d °° for,farther consideration on Thursday. The Chapel Exemption fill was third r eading to-morrow. —The other Orders %.,(;e0 then disposed of; and the House Adjool.lled at O'CLO • LC. ----- -,_ WO' MINORITY, ON THE EAST INDIA SHIPPING „, Os [FROM A CORIIFSPON:PENd The Ntanes of --, the Mindrit ' t%oted bast xigla -- 4 y who East Italia Shippigg Ma: Mr. Marryatt Mr. Ege.rton Mr. Astell , . Lord Neicou Mr. Sumner . _me. West.,,rn Mr. Round Mr. R. Wigrain. Mr. MsYielik General Doreton im e . c. Ellison . Mr. iNlitf.or_ Mr. D. - Alt nport Mr. Crickett Mr. P. 63 . ev.i s. wa its. ordered farl: Mr. Houblon Sr. G. Alien Mr. Glenfell Mr. Calcraft Me. Lyster Sir M. W. Ridley Sir C..Monck, } Tellers. Mr, Alderman Atkins The following Members paired off:-- - Sir M. B. Foulks w ith Mr. Porcber, • Mr. Cawthorn.. with Mr. R. Abercrorribtp 'Dnnas cl'is"4l Sir. R.Gordan .. with Sir Sir T. Pechell.. with General Finch. heldijllStototr. .i\;:".e"--tis--teo-rDT--------IGasyoz..,C,oitit'ott-tiTeer's9.l,4okqeao'ft ‘iiiis%,e.::: before . di_miler:ll,sat'int ial.ltiCes lalltenolts°lesealtlei ne°rlSlionittiltljleits•- b‘tl;3(ejiyectso,tlSY'lsgoarsi°nl:':rlittl:;:iii:e: hol(l>ddorefatclfilial bullock. running yifini.ltliil.lllll:litillg, in consequence of ittlrd SlUtatftii‘eitilisi)l.car:ttett°l)-,ilt :t. thi`l'e(!ca( dc twoe ce a soe (iii n lc) eusd of el ae int d ai :rm ; 0 ..yl,:trel s7si'lactic: ,foarbtohye,laabstoisti:ll3llo:e:ss:::ool: Charing on INionclay eveol 7reer, accif(ilierniottiosicyciti.rr occurred pi ntutilliseinneenith_nstf : so closely pushed by tile anima A(I, 'hen the spikes entered ir ity, his body, he _w,as taken to St. Martin's workhouse. red iu °cello:1' rif, to go over the railings at ',il accidents has North, by the firing or blasing -of k.' thec vbelo cin'tnging to Messrs. Ncstiot an. Co. 10 i 000,..., ~_ll y of Newbattle, in the county ot 1)1"0,1 just. I' is dreadful calatnity took phice oil the "._5.: 40 oftenof. upwards of .70. persons lost their lilieo to ittili_elie.:eain.iiLigtoitaneitititasipeicevla,itior.i endeavoured le: Houghton-le-Spring unfortunate vittims were to be t'ttoidal "llt"-le-Spring 1 .or interment o butso at last, and about 30 more were to be oc Oft this3teeet and Fainshaw. The erraioct r_, disastrous' event bad not been asc tberc il novne.ll the last accounts came awaY, buctfo it ilif. doubt it was occasioned by means of i'liollY Fur same time no i er on could be Otillt ocer' enough . ..) 'r to descend into tile pit, in order oou tail) the state of thing b I v and to {lean ighr 5e o y WV "1 Of to save . any of the unfortunate persons ~bson, I still remain-alive. •At length Thoinas il'", olteere` the village of -Houghton-le-Spring, colt 05° hise se", ices for this perilous andertalciago tiot II xetten himself in the cause of holowait-Y were 501 actually got up six of the sufferers, ho. uitiopt° alive, but with vtry small hopes of tb,r recur , - ol cry. Aff' ,clock' aria .. On Friday night last, about ten o'c _.,.t .0 singlerOOE was returning to Brping title sto? himbeet on the Leabridgeoad by thrCe . cite), /le but pushing his horse, which was veri srif isfot, overthrew the luau who had placed'hinisibt tit pot' the animal, and by that zudatts escaßedi, at•Dill!' until another Of the villains-fired a pist?Lie of IJ° the ball of which perforated the left Y1`._,1.„. without great coat, hilll further it ju j , • . yo 06; . MA RRIFP. . I.,tr, iv Lately, at Bolton-le-Moors, Lancashire, Wil 1:_, ipit Fsc • ' of Chadivi.cli 5/ ' ' I. of Bolton 001 to ikdiss Singleton, blesdale. PIE 1). .. 00111°05PC: n ..,n sat arday, the 3d inst. of ii-deciille, at bre' ‘OO,iOP near Kilhnro, in the tAth year of legit,e, 1%1 .3. ' ' .or. Wife of Dr. Mai:kin:ion, of John-str Adelpin. 0 0 On the inorniii,„.• of the 6th instant, at ;veslialui,6,' aq., eestershire, Mrs: Nlaurice Lady of Capt. Matt lle'. whoge amiable virtues and 'intelligent Wind ha , Hided and distress hushin' to devloie her Ivo. p4' On the -260 tiltedarah, wife of ltobert Varniete • Burgh-hall, Norfolk. l ~~' Tv • N'ell", LONDON : Printed liv J. 13. (;=\-V-`''' and rnblcslied by W. A. at the i le, Stiand ; 40,,.ree aape Vin' Pent,, Orders, Lettcrs (pust-raid), Zcc. aiust f;