The Sun. — London, England, 1820-04-17 00:00:00

INI bLLIGLNL E. COURT OF KINWS BENCH, APrut, 15. CENOTAPH TO TIIE LATE PRINCESS CHARLOTTE. LIFit.L.--NUTTALL V. CLEMPNT. - - - ' l ' Hs %VAS lin Re' 3011 ag4inst the Proprietor of the t•onday hnd Mouthy Observer Newspapers. for pOtlishing totee alleged libels the former, of 1 ,1. d e o fice riiii,g tt i e comincr as a I\lttn ber of the vionti tee for erecting a Cenotaph or Al‘otottletit to - he Nle9iory of her la , e Royal Hie — „es., t he i ttc .,, s c hal i wte g f w a l es a „ u i s,, xe Cohnt - lt, sith•cription, imputing frand b (I dishonesty to him in the disposition of the tilf)tele•-collected. in hk character of a Cutllllllltt Illy 1~. SCArsLETT.Sta:ed the case. The plaintiff i ,n IlityNteiett of eonehlerable emittettee, and a getolt men of legit end n ein T ea , liehle cheracter ; lie e ptito ipel litte.itiett to the Westminster leti!tuaiy, and a Director of the Funds of that he festilotion. Elr cumpleined ot tt !the oe h ie d eo ester, e c t i i e e it e lf t i mes a nd un e (ler y circernst aoces tvonie he most galling to ;lie spirit oi a Geittlenten. The subject of ' the ,mac ort•,eoeil with that neltapny eied ref tie einsl history when the country lost a 'oust i's Princess. After the unhappy esent to sse sir alluded, it was tile universal of a lot.sl peblie t het soweething in the shape of e tercieeal inneotte,ett shottld be erected, in or der to hand doe n to, posterity the feeling which so .rest ti ext ited in the mind id the tomtit y. ;Or. Yletthese Wyatt, a toting gentleman of dis tinguis!,ed erlettrity in the fine arts, cud the eldest sort of a gtivltßleu )(log entieent, proposed 3 plait erectieg a cnotitimtett suitable to the occasion. The plan he suggested was immediately received by the public with universal approbation. The t veet accumulation of the fund proposed naturally grs t eti the pteptiety of adopting some mode be which it should he duly administered for the inteeded purpose. lie therefore proposed that certain res p ec t a ble indisiduals should torn . ) them— selves into a committee for the purpose of receiv ing subscrip tions, aed placing the amount in the bands 01 e. banker, in older that it might he ap plied to its ohicet. Among the peiso, p s w ho c „„,, t,,e we r e; for •the purpose Of menagieg the pecu niary part of the plain, was Sir Henry Torrene, gentienl3 , i of the highest honour and diameter, whose class coenection and intimacy with the peke of York rendered him shove ail suspicion. The honourable persttes alluded to having ap poieted a backer of do:meter, the sithscrintioes vtere placed its his fiends; so that no possible sus• piciott could etise as to the due ac mittistration of the fend. Under these eireemstatices, %lore successive app' axed in the Obserz:er—a nest a . l'at'er (4 the m ost extensive circulation iit Len dote Two of them %%etc in the form of letters adeTv,see so the E.litOr, and signed " lnacstiga tor ;" tied the third was a paragraph of tee Etii• tor himself, coutainiug comments of a Irte , .! telt- • tkl , ey with the letters, imputing to the pleintiff and ceher Gentlemen of the Committee a fraudu lent itiiS3proptiation of the money subscribed for the Mentiment. Here the Learned Counsel re ferred to the libels, and commented uton them in itteguage of strong animadversion. [-le admitted that, after an action had been brought against the defendant, he b'ad publi,beci in his paper an apolegetieal statement, professing that be had rublisited the libels under a mistake, anti in igno rance of rite real circumstances of the case, and of the characters of the persons libelled. The reeerned Counsel stated, that he was in a condition to prove that the libellous insinuations published by site defendint were without the slightest fonn datioe. Before ally witnesses were called to sup pert the plaintiff's case, Mr. Areoetenus interposed on behalf of the de fendant, amid proposed to save the time of the Court, by admitting all that had been stated by Eris Learned Friend to be perfectly true. Sincerely lamenting the publicatious, and admitting that they contained matter not founded in truth, he was ies , ructed by Mr. Clement to make the most ample apology- to the plaintiff, and also.to the other fietelemen named, whose characters he .was convinced deset et•l the highest eulogiums passed by his Leaned Friend ; and as an additional proof of hie sincerity, he of feted to give the plaintiff a verdict of 501. the defendant paying the costs of the cause as between attorney and client, Mr. SCARLETT, after conferring with the plain tiff's solicitor; accepted the terms proposed, and repeated, that, as it was not Dr. Nuttal's object to recover pecuniary satisfaction, the damages of fered would be appropriated, it not to some cha rit able use, certainly towerdi the completion of that naiional design to which the libels related. Mr. Justice IioLtIOYD, in addressing the Jury, said he thought the plaintiff was entilled to the wannest commentlaiion, for the forbearance he bad shown in accepting the terms proposed by the defendant. The Jury, under his Lordship's direction, found a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages Fifty Pounds. SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS, Scd: A2ril 10, John Calderwood, merchant and grocer, Irvine— Creditors meet in Holm' Inn there, eoth April and sth May, at one. -- 1 t , Charles Household, •cooper, Glasgow—Creditors meet in the Lyceum Rooms there, 21st 'April and sth May, at one. PXAMINITIONS, 14EETINGS, &e. John Stevenson, and Co. dyers at Govan Croft, Glasgow, to be examined hi the Sheriff Clerks Office there, 2.1t11 April and Bth sky, at I 1. Bole, wright and builder, Glasgow, to he .exa . in:-leU in the Sheriff' Clerk's . Oflice there, 27th April and 16th • Nay, at 11.- Robert. kl•trnall, merchant and shipowner, Irvine, to he exacnined in the Sheriff Clerk's Office, Ayr, 22d April and 611+ May, it la. Creditor s 4 - Woodmas and Lookup, tanners, Dumfries, meet itCNilltolson's Coff,?elionse there, sd May, at 12. Creffie*4 of Thomas Harkness, of ilaSlim ore, wood and 'wool atcretiaist, Cowal, Argyllshire, meet in the New Inn, .rtta A!irii, at 12.. ~,fire,litoes Ja.wes Don'' ; :laS,• merchant, Stirling, meet in in ii there, 1 - it May, at 12. ."'Qrt&t.,:rs of Aoth.e.A.s4satrtic.s,ri, merchant, Terriff, meet in Trustee's Office ; Aberdeen, 2d May, at 12. i i i Credtiees of •yonn Nl..nitwits, some time ',Hitler, Glasgow, meet by the TrOstce's (Mice .62re, i7th April. Cre.l.i<irs •akt Arclti,iloAlif NVEwen, tocriAtoot, Glasgow, meet i.,i the Office of Alexander Ure, writer there, 2d May, lc'. 2. . . . States nf she. affairs of Andrew Chriitie, late merchant Leith, lie with the trwstec—Nu itividend. 3iz . i4gc• of 41.13 m, sua r . fur a d:scLarig,:. ctiEsito ASSIZE, ArBIL 14. CHARGE OF CONSPIRACY TO POISON CATTLE, &e. THE. KING 7'HE REV. .1 511 L) A KING AND BRYAN KIN(i, EsQ. Mr. V. tt.LIAMs opened the proceedings. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, in opening the case to the Jury, seated the Defendants to be charged in the fiat count of tie it t elictment, with placing arsreie in certain pieces, with intent to poisou divers of his Majeaty's liege subjects 5 in the se cond count, en intent •0 t wister) cattle, the pro petty ot the Kirres subjects ; the third charged an ietret to poison swine and cattle ; the tourth charged an intent to poison cattle and swine, the property of Henry and the fifth charg. ed the laying of a deadly poison, called ersenic, in certain closeK, to the evil example of. others. The founds[ ion of the complaint which jie laid ;Against the defendants waa of a very extraordinat y nature. This would be seeee . from a letter which would be pr o duced, in whiCh the purpose of Mr. Joshua King waselouhle hinted at. It appeared that the Rev. Joabea King was in the habit of coining down in the autumn to the Hundred of IVorrall, to sisit his brother Bryan, and his father and another brother, who were in that neighbour hood. Mr. King was fond of field sports, and having no lands of his own, he had . intruded on the grounds of Sir 'lliomaa Stanley. That Mee. Baronet, anxious to preserve his game, complained of this re e eetcdly in a gentlemanly manner (those who knew him knew that be would complaiu in no other wny), but without t Get, and at length he was obliged to tiling an action against the Rev. J. King, under the game laws, and obtained a ver dict. This seemed to have rankled its the breast of that Gentleman ever since, and it a ppeared that he had taken up an idea that he might come down there, and spread poison under the pretence of doing it to destroy luxe's, or vermin, as they were called in this country, and thus destroy the pro perty of another at his pleasure. Sit Thomas had smile intimation of a design to injure his game, and was on the lookout ; but a circumstance beppened which tavoined him tuore then any wetchfultiess on his part could be expected to do. Mr. George King had - come down int , that part of the country before his brother, and happened that a little girl, the danAhter oh a cottager of the mime of Davis, found a scrap of paper, which up peared to be pert of a letter to Mr. G. King, and weich her parents thought right to einamonieete to Sir Thomas Stenlev. Part of one malt of the sheet of paper which had beets found was lost, but the mind and object of the Rev. Gentleman was sefficiehtly explained-by what had been saved. The letter, which he read, appeared to have been writ tee to Mr. G. King, and referred to certain legal proceedings in which Sir'''. Stauley was concerned. It 'vent on to point nut in what way all the foxes of the Hon. 11a1 t. inight be destroyed, by means ot poison, in the course of one fortnight—expreseed a determieation, on ine part of the writer, to annoy tee tyrant, and teach him that, proud as he was, with all his despotiqn, he was as mete dependent, for his pleasures ou the forbearance ot o: hers, as they were ou his. The letter also contained some hints on the way in which hares and other game might be disposed of, and suggested, that each fox des! roved should be sent to Sir T. Stanley, with Mr King's compliments on a label affixed to its neck ; and recommended, that the skittle course should be pursued, if a few dead p artr idges should be found on his grouoids. It would be proved, that a man, who would be brought before the Jury, was hired by Mr. King to earry into effect the designs avowed in these letters. Mr. King came down on a Saturday, the 11th o f September; and, on •he following day, S un d a y, he directed theltlon ratan s nto proceed to a a ndtake favourite s optrnee serve of Sir l traps for catching hares and vermin. On the following Sunday he sent for this man again, and gave him garbage and entrails, (which were poisoned,) to put in the way of Sir Thomas Stan ley's game. Mr. Bryan King, who Was charged as conspiring with his brother Joshua, went w i t h the man, and there was no doubt of their having spread the poison on the ground. Now, it the combination of these two Gentlemen went merely to kill foxes, he shoold show his ignorance by considering it an iudictable offence. lie admitted that to kill foxes was tile primary object, but the close being open to the farm of a person of the name of Hancock, and some other animals being likely to be destroyed hy the poison, it was to be considered, that lie (Mr. King) intchded that which was the probable consequence of what he did. Supposing a bare had been poisoned—that hare might have been eaten by the family, and, they would have been poisoned by it ; and this being the probable consequence of what had been attempted, it was to be considered that the Rev. Gentleman contemplated the poisoning of his Ma jesty's subjects, though his main object was to destroy foxes. It would be for the Jury to con sider, whether, though his principal object was to annoy his neighbour by destroying loxes, he ought not to he answerable tor the mischief which was likely to result from what .had been done. Mr. J. King, examined by Mr. Serjeani Ccoss. —Was brother to the two teetendants. The letter, which had been found, he believed to be in the hand-writing of his brother. Ile con cluded that it had come to hint by the post. Cross-examined by Mr. Joses—lt was a private letter. Ile meant to give publicity to its con tents. It was written, so far DS he could recol lect, in consequence - of. a communication that he had made to his brother, on the subject of the plan adopted by a neighbour who had been very much.annoyed by Sir Thomas Stanley in the same way that his brother had been, who had hung the foxes destroyed on a tree by which the hounds of Sir Thomas passed, and had threatened to destroy his'game. The letter related to nothing but foxes and gaine. He had a strong belief that the letter produced had been taken out of his house at Tran more. He had taken it there intending to stake its contents public. Believed that he himself had never torn it up. . Re-examined by Mr. Sety.qlnt Caoss.—lle meant to tell at2y body about the howe, th4ti• Was his iffietawn to,vois( , o .he g „me. - Did 'tell several persons in it.. lie took I:itle inteie,t in it, considering it a very trivia) my ter. lle 10151 a Cubitt, of Liverpool p,op;e in Cheshire, but did not recollect their names, nor where he told them. Ile told them in the sum mer. Dared to say that he had read the letter. Should not have thought it a trifling thing to poison all the game, it it bad been really intend ed, but that it never was. He understood that his brother intended to show that letter to Sir Thomas Stanley. in order to spew that be (the Rev. Joshua Icing) was in earnest in the busi ness. His brother, he conceived, meant the con tents of the letter to be communicated to Sir T. Sosoley, but not the letter itself, which he be lieved had been stolen from his house at Tran more. He believed lie had suggested this plan to his brother, intending it meralv as a threat. The letter merely adored a proposal of the witness's. The neighbour had been annoyed, like his bro ther, by actions commenced against bins by Sir Thomas, hut nut for poaching, tie believed. His brother had not been proiecuted for poaching, hut for a trespass in pursuit of game. Believed his ' brother did tiro intend to poison the game, even when he wrote the letter. Never heard from ei ther of his brothers, that they had spread poison, or ordered poison to be sweat!. He had heard from others that they had done so, but could nut recollect that he had heard it front them in the presence of his brothers. Iticharo S:auilen, examine,: by Nit-. WILLIAMS. Was one of :!iir T. Stan! , y's tenants. Was watching on the 12th SepteMber, in a cover be longing to Sir Thotrzs. He saw Mr, Bryan King and a shocm4cer of the :tame of Johnson come there. They threw something ?root a bag ito the midst of t;te in open places—in a good many II WaS a: a good distahco. On seeing witness they ran away. He cause up with them, and :old Johnson that he was the man L►P had been, lookioe for'a long time. LT , said 'his in presence of Mr. B. King, v.r , o said that witness had no right to take the hag, if he took Johnson, He (witness) then took Johnson and the bag, which was found to caostain some entrails of fowls, two young hares (dead), two cakes that seemed mixed tip with cheese, and three steel traps. He delivered some of die things to Davis, the groom, who gave them and others to Isaac Oakes, the druggist. Cross-examined by Mr. Law.—The h,!rea were two little ones, that had been cut coo of the mo ther's belly. The cover was.a goys cover. Smoo.b pointers would hunt in it.. Lust sight of the men when in the cover from the height of the Boss. They were tolerably tall men. Took Johnson in to Sir Thomas, who was dining with a party of ft iends. Ile was then examined. He might ei ther go or stop. Fie preferred staying all night. Ile was ex.smined twice that night, and once in the n , rnii}g. Witness had met Mi. King. Was (Fite sure that he hail never said to any one that tie would hang or transport the parson. Sir Tho mas Stanley was not Lord of the Manor, and did not own or hold a foot of land within two miles of the cover. . _ Mary Davis, examined by the ATTORNRY-GE NFRAL.—Mr. G. King's house, at Tranmore, was about twrlve yards Irons her father's. Mr• King's family, she thought, came to Tranmore in May.— She saw the servant throw some rubbish in the lane ; she thought she might find some play thing, but found nothing but part of a letter and the half of a knife. The letter produced, she thought, was the) same that she had found, but her mother knew, for she could read. _ . MlHim Johnson, examined by Mr. Serjeant Cnoss—He knew the defendants, He was found in a cover one Sunday. He was scot by Mr. Jo shua King, anti was accompanied by Mr. B. King. Might have seen Mr. Joshua King about a fort night before. Mr. Joshua King went to his house, and said be wanted hint to catch foxes. He did nothing but set traps to catch them the first time. On the next Sunday he was provided. with a bag, and front Mr. King's scullery those things Were furnished, which were after wards found in it. He went with Mr. B. King to the cover, where he was found by the keeper, Standen. He saw the two defendants together in the scullery, and it was there settled that he was to go to tie cover. Edward Davies, examined by Mr. WILLIAMS— Received a bag from Standen, which he delivered to Isaac Oakes. Isaac Oakes, examined by Mr. WILLIAMS-Was assistant to a druggist. He examined a substance somewhat resembling cheese that was in the bag, and on anllyzing it, discovered the presence of arsenic, sufficient probably to dcstroy many ani mals or men. . _ _ Henry Hancock, examined by the ATTORNEY GE MERAL—Had found in the cover sortie cakes of white stuff, and some entrails of fowle, scattered in different parts of the cover. His pigs used to go ipto this cover. He thought that pigs would h a ve eaten suzli Mill as had been left there. Cattle could go into that cover. In consequence of the discovery, he was a little alarmed fot fear the cat tle and pigs should be poisoned, and ,in conse quence prevrnted them from going into the stub ble, from which they might get into the cover. Cross-examined by Mr. JoNas—Never turned pigs orcattle into the cover ; never knew any use made of that cover but for the encouragement of the hreed of foxes. Re-examined by the ATTORNEY -GRNERAL—Bad often seen pigs and cattle pass through the cover of the adjoining field. Mr. JON as rose to address the Jury in behalf of the two defendants under considerable embar rassment, from the manner in which it had been attempted to attract public curiosity to their case - , but not from any apprehension as to the result of the trial, depending, as that did, ott the evidence which had been given. These Gentlemen were not only hitherto men of irreproachable character, but Gentlemen whose characters stood eruinently high, and they had given a proof_of conscious in lioCerlCe by the course they had `pUrstsed this day. The Attorney-General, finding that but three or tour Special Jurors were present, was willing to put off !Tie trial, and had not prayed a tales; but he (Mr. Jones) had called it on, that the defend ; ants might nut . ba%e this charge kept hatip,ing over them, a at they might -at once fairly , nret the tux-hurving-party, with whom it ori ginated. Mr. Joshua King was Rector of the rop6lon, p ! itiAl of St. Matthew, Bethnal green, near - Lowdlin. At (PA: period of the year he atl Mott in the of vt ititjg his lather in the hundred of Worrall, on whose freehold Aft - . King bad thought be might be allowed to sport on an odd day or two, with a gun in his hand. This was, however, opposed, not by the law of the land, but by those who wished to get into their bands the comrtiand of all the game in the Hundred of Worrall. The last count, he contended, imputed no act at all, and could not be maintained. But the great question which the Jury bad to try was, whether the defendants had seriously intended to poison men or cattle. 1 1 they had been charged with intending to destroy Sir Thomas Stanley's game, he should have bad to put in a diff,:rent answer ; but at present the Jury had only to consider whether they, acting 0 0 their oeti.s, could decide that the detendants in' tended to poison men •or cattle. What motive could they have for doing so, and what probabi . lity was there that men or cattle would be ittior' led by what they were charged with doing ? It WO not to be supposed that Sir T. Stanley or that Mr. Hancock, it they went to the cover, wouhl eat the substances described to have been plo.ced there, and therefore the idea that it was the in teution of the defendants to destroy the K.1:10 subjects could not be sobetly entertained. Tug Learned G.lntlernan was proceeding, when— Mr. Justice IJAE3HALL remarked, that noire ot the evidence which had been given went to prove the first ;our counts of the indiconeol ; and on the fifth it toss useless to procz•ed, merely charged thAt which might be an innoc , !itt or even a 14•tulable act. The ClithF JusTica said, be shobld ellar , !e g Jury to this efL.ct, and therefore be tHisi: - .. ttlieless to proceed, The ATTORNEY-GRNERAL admitted Ow the in ii ictment ought to have ch,o.gcti the c?i , tel!:44otg with conspiring, to poison Sir T.'Sroi garoe• Mr. SerieAlit CROSS was of opinion tiler. thi dictinent was not so funned as to reach the intent educed in Mt. Joshua letter. Mr. Jo denied that any diabolical intent lied been proved. So often as this charge was mark , he 'would repel it. `The Jury then, under the direction of the Chief Justice, returned a verdict of Not Guilty. From the LONDON GAZETTE of April 15. BANKRUPT ENLARGP.D. Joseph Lyne, Finsbury-3quare, merchant, from April 1 to May 9, at eleven, at BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED. Andrew Pollard, Poole, grocer. .. , :;!ton, Devon, banker. t'S. W. Chapman, Gravesend, Kt:ill, te surrender April 22, '29, and May 27, at Gnildhall• Attorney, Mr. Adams, Gray's-inn-square, LG.:eon. G. Hadley, Greenwich, Keilt, draper, April May 27, at eleven, at Guildhall, London , Attory, Fisher, Furnivars-inti. Holborn. S. Brewer, New Brentford, Middlesex, grocer, April J 25, and May 27, at eleven, at Guildhall, London. AttorniCt Mr. Read, Mark-lane, London. J. Varley, Great Titeliii,lti-street, Oxford-street, print' seller, April 18, 29, and May 27, at twelve, at (4uildliall . Attornies, Messrs. Grimaldi and Stables, Copthall-oosser Throgmorton-street. R. Claridge, Oddington, Gloucester, farmer, April 22. at seven, 29, and May 27, at eleven, at the Royal Hotel, Chel' tenhana. Attornies, Mr. Tarn, Stow-on-the-Wold, Gloucer tersbire and Messrs. Mason and Housman, New Bridge" street, Loudon. E. Stephens, Aintree, Lancaster, sail-tnaker, Mai' 6, 34' ' and 27, at one, at the York Hotel, Liverpool. At tortriess Mr. Sherratt, Prescott ; and Messrs. Adlington and Grego* , Bedford-row,. London. M. Moukhouse, Bed weity, Monmouthshire, apothecarY . April '7, and May 27, at twelve, at the Commercro Rooms, BrLtni. Attornies, Messrs. lizard and Blower, Lit , ' ; and Messrs. Leman, Bristol. W. Wood, Wimpole-street, St. Mary-le-bone, wax 3 4 , tallow-chandler, April 25, May 2, 27, at ten, at Gnildba he Attornies, Messrs. Allen, Gylby, and Allett, Carlisie•sttrc i f Soho. E. Gore, Nettiebed, Oxford, innkeeper, April 22, 99, 313 May 27, at twelve, at Guildhall. Attornies, Mr. Hamilta24 Berwick-weer, Noho ; and Mr : Smith, Reading. DIVIDENDS. 11Iay 9, R. Potts, Holborn-hill, haberdasher—May Whining, Bristol, plumber—May 9, E. Cotlinson, Crooli O3. lane, oil merchant—May 9, T. Atherton, Liverpool, tanner-'' May 24, E. Bailey, Preshure, Wiltshire, parchment. in alid —May 8, T. Diehen, Litchfield. cotton and worsied spitintr -- " May 9, T. White, Liverpool, merchant—May 9, G. Biogieff Piccadilly, milliner—May 10, A. Abbott, Liverpool, upl3- 01 : t sterer—May 13, C. Shoobridge, Kensington, draper-I\lW D/ J. Cooper, Carlton, Lincolnshire, horse dealer—May 9. Ball, Watling-street, straw hat manufacturer—May Keay, Mark-lane, wine merchant—May 6, J. Dowley, 1 47 i," low-street, Banhside, corn add coal merchant—Ala.: 13, Street, and W. Ntreet, Bucklersoury, stationers—May Thompson, Bishopsgate-street Within, merchant—May S, Parke and P. F. Parke,,Manchester, cotton spitint re—May ll' H. Holden, Ripponden, Yorkshire, grocer--M ay 6, A.GralcaOf Haslingden, Lancashire, draper—May u, S. Lapage, 1.0.0 44 " 14 dealer—April 22, J. S. Rains, Wapping Wall, inerchant--' May B,' W.' Coppin, North Shields, ship owner—May 2, Coppin, North Shields, master mariner. CERTIFICATES—MAY B. W. Norris, Romser, timber merchant—W. Chapman, I ge shopsgate-street Without, haberdasher—R. Cole, priair street, haberdasher—J. Bradley, Jewin-street, silk manufacturer—G. Pulleyn, York, linen draper-- Mountjoy, Harwell Nursery, Middlesex, seedenian—P.l 3o ,,," °7 Cheltenham, grocer—T. Robinson, Cambridge, butcher... 4". Edwards, Newport, Monmoutshire, corn-dealer—J. Kite Carlisle, tallow-chandler—J. Stevens, Cherrybinton, Car t bridgeshire, gardener—W. Lowndes, J. Robinson, anal Neild, Marichester, cotton merchants—L. Teatiter s N0t.11.14 - ham, dealer. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. B. Martindale and It. H. Salmon, Gray's-inn-square, l i t tornics—S. Baker, E. Barnes, and M. Morehead, Pen l / 11 ,1; court, Old Broad-street—J. Seagrim, stn. J.Seagrim,jun.",,; Thring, and H. Seagrini, Wilton, carpet manufaetfic' e d (so far as relates to the said W. Thring)—.l. Pitt, T. P o es , ef W. Fripp, 'E. Brice, and E. New, Bristol, bankers (so P . as concerns the said E. New)—G. Watson and J. \Vatting-street, warehousemen—J. Bruce and F. 13• 11 °_,A ley, Cross-lane, Long-acre, engravers—E. Frederic M. Walker, Lower Brook-street, Grosvenor-gin - ark t 1211 '. 0 ners—J. Brown and J. Hardman, Birmingham, Brituot d metal manufacturers—E. Twiss, T. Sutton, and M. suc t . Old Cavendish-street, corset and dress makers—T. J. Bateman, and T.. Foyson, Norwich, woolstapler i tp S. Codner, W. Cockier, J. Drew, and R. - Also', 3 Teignmouth, Devonshire, merchants—B. Smith, and ,1 Smith, jun. Camberwell, silversmiths---W. Gunn f, J. Gun, Spicer-street, Brickdaue, colour manufacturers Gray and J. Gray, jun. Birmingham, wine and spirit 400, chant s —W. Godfree and W. I'. Musgrave, Nobi e-street, housemen—W. Price and J. Price, Stroud, Gloucesters +o o; iron founders—S. Tayler, E. Tayler, J. Wavell, and it•_„j Moorey, Newport, Isle of Wight, stiveyors—W. Noake T. Noah e, %Volverhampton„ brass founders. BIRTH. Vif " On Monday last, the Lady of Mr. Foote, Sorgeon, ware, of a daughter. MARRIED. r$ • At Rome, the Hon. WiMani Dawson, to Ntience, ) 1013° Ititt dangrner of Lieut.• General .S.:4tt, and grand daughter " late Sit Edward Blackett, DIED. t fie On Friday last, Henry Sitnhey, Esq. of Globe-stair s / the' !tithe, aged 70. vei r ' On Friday, at her house in Oxford-street, in her 74 .1 .` the Dowager Lady Burgoyne. LONDON: Printed Ity J. B. CA:ZSTAITIS, t 'No. i 9, 0, Ormond-street, Queen-stilt-arc; and pu!)lislied ttY s olo SCHIPPS, of N. , South 111olton-strect, at 1 .10 ,.,10 1, Office, Nn. 112, Strand ; sehmt Advettisernents, Lettet 1,, &t. s:.ust-pftitn mutt be adijrcssed. ~.,~~ .., %f •,r, • • t' ' ' ~ . . i Oqj - 3 1 ,f lit .":VE eir (h ot ti tiiet tug 1 341 1 h ;Vtri.ij dlst s 04 tA!Oril l•poi 'tat-,t I.un4 .1(1 IT .:: i . tl th Vtru (rein •..t.'5t4 , 111 - f,s)r • tl sifit n t raw 4"ur at Bits s Uu~i; s~;~ ~nj f Cl~ur +._.. , s: .Za„ l 1 1 44 Pclit; ats)ll . rl yin • • ' 'lli Nixtt ;Leath! -the t %Art t 05U *ver;: IVa 40e's _ _ ''.~3s