The Sun. — London, England, 1820-09-04 00:00:00

the r cans o.i se ra the! ißeio,ist 'ert s Wer6 ,Wer h4 OW th° P S' Lt t (3°l had Ps Ott lo t )-i0 ' ma, $ otll9‘ e9t 01! )Oth i g etheft trausly :don : 4 erstO a grea t h inter ( d by ° A as, all" t in tti ;hair. ad 0 0 for Of :er g a11u4167 e of 011 she 10 5 ?.ss to to his right i m suite; Cfr sai ul t. ,note great )1n t 1 ine T D she., 3 aIiVAL fl kiTol f ! it Ater, ws e:cri°v rson —I 104 c. er , mu . 1' cl ° . s bu t t 5 jet whe°' slid a l f _1 red,; t I d°ll referre, ter wit" hat 141 at f° ll i Loncl ° i my au- the ct/ ir read' t o to go • nfte rs 3,5 e 1: 11 ° 4 31) r e ? ---1 I'd gf 0 f ess, ' iclati° n. l Areo, sag tb° k to b , a! il i g e ci rt 01) , o i ; int° ' itb f 3er 1.10V9w pure" "ming over to England. At the same time I received information to set off, I was told I could be placed out as a governess, if I had let ts rs of recommendation. At the same time, be ing afraid h er R oya l Hi g h ness wou ld di sm i ss my sister, I wrote to my sister, and dared not write freely for fear it would be seen. I said to my 818te r) what was read was only to let her know, if the was dismiss e d th er e, I w o uld find means °',, Placing her here, and pay her journey. If I i'rote again to her she feared the Princess would read th e letter, and I wished to convince her ° Yal Highness I would say nothing against v er , even in England. In several private con ersations, although many questions were put to I avoided saying what took place at the ° , u se. These are my i reasons for writing that e t - ter to my sister. ,Mr. Wismams—Ask her if she has given a f ull explanation ?—I have said so to my sister to PEI the journey. The reference to the banker 1 5 to say, that I wish to take the money now with guardian, and place it here. They told me ittne interest wou ld b e d ou bl e . If 1 h a d s ome o f here for.myself, or my sister, I could make use of it. Ask her if she has any more last words—any farther explanation ?—No further. ti Don't l e t h er b e i n a h urry ; l e t h er ta k e h er nle ; now, any further explanation to give ? (Afte r a pause)—l wished by that to convince t he Princess, though I shall have questions put 41 ) me, money would not tempt me. Now have you any other explanation ?—I 4 4), to say - also that I felt a great degree of at tachment to h e r Royal Highness, for her great ""odness to me while in her house. A ny more ?—I can't remember entirely all. l aW the letter last night ; I saw two letters ; " I Y saw the date of that from Colombier. Illath ! no observation on the other. d on !'en you went from this place last night (I -v i : 2 ; ask you the names, but) who accompanied lady, one of my friends. xa '° you mean to represent that nobody else vr tl i,, You, since you were examined here last have seen the people of the house and the friend who accompanied me; I don't know e name. t e I s. you delay near this place, where we are, r e f °r e You went home last night ?—I went di etly h ome. )11 irectly ; did you not stay somewhere or flier before you went to the place you reside 1 ,,•:" . ", In going out hence I went directly home, l 'uout waiting— Th e LORD; CnANcELLon.--That's not an an ; put it before she began to go. Wu.LlAsis.--I am not asking her whether e she went straight borne, hut I am asking her if did not stay -somewhere before she began to "Ine I remained a minute in a room above er e. minute—how long ?—I don't recollect ex 4ctly. ' ° you mean to represent you did not stop fair an hour in- the zoom above stairs ?—I will a tsw ear that I may not have remained there if an hour. , : / . 34 You swear you did not renlain an hour ? 4 . , t swear as to , the time I remained there. kid at did you mean to say just now, when you h u e You did not remain there more than a meant I did not remain there long. 1 1 ,1 11 ` r w, in order to have some notion of that, 1 104 You swear you did not remain there two can't swear as to what time. yo u You mean to represent that nobody saw but the person who accompanied you home ? ki s e t.L W the lady who accompanied me home, b k, " , e gentle me n who came to fetch me. thi she nse,an to represent she has not been ti th e i ng of this letter since she was examined in te it ly 4 .. flacon of yesterday ?—I have not passed i lie. " lll e in-speaking of it ; I have been reflect- D 0 re You mean to say that you have not been tetn ig toe on it all the time ?—On my arrival at wh at 'retired to my bed. IP eat does she mean by the capital of Europe ` 4 t letter ?—it is so long since I wrote that Z 5 that I cannot recal what I meant. aid ell, having heard that letter read in French k t in English, don't you know what you mean ti e ' ) capital of Europe ?—lt is impossible for at such a distance of time, to recollect what va ll -e "t by all th e w ords. It is so long since, I 11)10t recollect. ° You mean t o say that after having heard , Lotletter read'in French and English, you do ti ke kl °W what it mean t ?—After such a length of The cannot recollect. ta D i fn ,n You do not k n ow what you meant by the lo t i p 7; of Europe ?—I do not recollect, it is so io sin ce. 4 trib li g a in ask, what place did you mean to de to . 1 e by the ca pit a l o f E uro p e ?—I cannot recal Ivi 3 ' mind what I meant, but that expression I 411 eso rnetimes in a- double sense, I sometimes Pe tt, 'olombier and Lausanne the Capital of Ea mr.,-- a jok e . "Of , "at ! call Colinnbier the capital of Europe ? tri' An es) s ometimes in joke, when writing to my h ow d You then meant Colombia ?—I don't know is it t „ -- say in your letter you wanted money -4o41: ` 11 ,,e or not ?—I might not have money at 41 ,y unt I could have got some by writing to I§r lli an• ieet, - ,Y° l l- want money or not ?—I do not recol it f r l • had money at home, but I could have got 11 011: 4 . r nY guardian. Perhaps I had money at , 13 0 Oy _ You mean t o say t h at you were su pp or ted 4, l ,: i rr f a th er and mother after you were in the Dttrei: of the Princess ?—I paid my board to my 4 4 for my maintenance. t ith e ; Y r °u were no t ass i s t e d i n mone y a ll th e 14 0 4 .--- 1 do not re co ll ect t h a t any one l en t me y!. Nor gave me any . ynt have a sister named Mariette ?—Yes. ti.,"11 w ere alway s muc h attac h e d to h er ?—Y es . the I You wanted her t o go i n t o the service of , S S ? ""-- es ; because she had, often spoke to me to get into a situation, and she wished to travel. What age was your. sister then ?—Nineteen years. What line of life is your step-father in at Co, lombier ?—A farmer. Does he farm his own estate ?—He has a small domain which he cultivates himself. Is he in tolerable circumstances ?—IIe works on the farm, and also my mother. He maintains himself by his daily labour ? Yes. He lives iu a small cottage ?—Yes, a small house. He ha . a family living with him ?—My mother and two daughters. Re-examined by the SOLICITOR-GENERAL. Q. Has your father any property of his own ? —A. Yes, the land he cultivates ; by that he Maintains himself. Have you any property ?—Yes. To what amount, nearly ?—Something about 50 louis an nually. Is your sister Mariette in the service of the Princess ?—Yes. Has she any property of her own ?—Nothing but What she receives from the Princess; she is my half sister. You said yesterday you were dismissed from the Princess's service for saying something that was not true, explain the cause of your dismissal ?—I was dismissed because the Prin cess had been told that M. Sachi bad given it out that had said that M. Sachi was in love with the Princess, and a letter was taken out of the post-office, at the bottom of which I had written " The Princess (aime) loved Sachi as in former times." I explained the word (rime was not meant by me to be loved, but, " liked M. Sachi in the same manner as other persons in the house." . • After this letter I was dismissed, because I said the Princess loved M. Sachi. Where was this letter written ?—At Pesaro. While you were writing this letter, did any one come into the room ?—Yes; Bergawi. Did he see you write it?—Yes. Did you take the letter any where ?—Yes, to Pesaro. Was any body appointed to go with you?--Yes, Hieronymus and my sister. After Bergami came into your room, was any body else ap pointed to go with you ?—Bergami came again into my room with his cousin Bergaini, who was going to Pesaro. Did Berga uti's cousin go with you I—Yes, he accompanied me as far as Pesaro. Did you put the letter in the Post-office yourself ?—Yes. With your own hands ?—Yes. - Did you see that letter after in anybody's hands ?—Yes, next morning I saw it in the Princess's hands. Did you write another letter ?—Yes. Was that letter also intercepted? This question was objected to. Did you ever see that letter in any other person's hands ? 'saw it, but it.was a long time afterwards. _ When you wrote the second letter, did you communicate the contents to anybody ?—No. Loan CHANCELLOR.—To whom was that .secund letter ad dressed ?—lt was not to Mr. Sachi, but to another name. What name ?—I do not recollect Whether it was Pauchio or some other name. Now yoti have told us that you did not communicate the contents of that letter to any body.; did her Royal Highness ever say any thing to you about it ?—lt was after the second letter that I was dismissed. I ask, did her Royal Highness mention to you any of the contents of the second letter ?—I do not recollect she men tioned any thing about the second letter. Did you ever say the Princess was in love with Stiehl ? —No. . • t• Was the charge then that was made against you true or false ?—lt was not true. ' Was her Royal Highness to your knowledge ever in love with Mr. Sachi? Mr. IVILLIAM s objected to the question. ,The SoLICITOR•GENERAL said, he wished to give the witness an opportunity of words which had fallen from her on the pre ceding day. Yesterday the witness had said it was not true that the Princess was ever in love with Mr. Sochi, and he now wished to spew that she had never stated the fact. Was the Princess, to your knowledge, in love with Sachi ? Mr. WILLIAMS objected to the question. At the time that the letter was produced by the Princess to you, was any one else present ?—Yes, several other persons. Where was M. Bergami ?—ln the same room with• her Royal Hi g h ness . .To what place was the first letter addressed ?—Te Milan. How tar is it from Pesaro to Milan ?—You may travel in two or three days, I think, by post. I am speaking of the letter which you yourself put into the post office. Is that it ?—Yes. A letter has been produced, dated from Rimini, was it writ ten there ?—Yes. How long after you left the Princess's house?—The same day. Have you written other letters to your sister?—Yes. Few or many ?—Neither many nor few. I mean some. Say about how many ?—Five, six, or seven. While your sister was in the Princess's service ?—Yes. Did your sister correspond witn you and your mother?— We never had any news from my sister. What do you mean ?—My sister never answered my letters. Did you or your mother ever receive any answer to your sister's letters from any body else ?—We received letters from some other person in the name of my sister. Do you know the handwriting of the Princess of Wales ? Y es. Do you know if any of the letters you received were in the hand-writing of the Princess of Wales. Mr. WILLIAMS objected to that question. Is this ()tie of the letters ?—Yes. • Do you believe it to be the hand-writing of the Princess of Wales ?—The band-writinz resembles very much that of her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales. 1 do not ask you to swear that it is in the hand-writing of the Princess of Wales, but whether you believe it to be in her hand-writing ?-1 believe it is her hand-writing. Did you or your mother ever receive a letter in the hand writing of your sister ?—My mother received one while I was at Milan in my sister's hand-writing. You have said Bergami was present when the letter you Put into the post-office was produced by her Royal Highness, what did he say?—Bergami said, it was true that I had said, that the Princess was in love with . M Sachi ? I made a pro= posal to write to Mr. Sachi to know the truth, and Mr. Ber gami opposed it. What else did lie do ?—M. Bergami accused me of having passed a night in the corridor with M. Sachi. What did you say to that?-1 answered, that my sister was , present, and could say that I had slept with her. Was your sister present ?—She was. Had you slept with her ?—I had. Was the charge made against you by Bergami true I—lt was' not true. Was any thing more done on it ?—No. Was it true you did sleep with M. Sochi ?—No; with my sister. You have said two months ago you took an oath to a depo sition.?—Yes. Who applied to you to•do so?—Mr. Powell applied to me to swear to my deposition. At the time you took that oath, did be explain for what pttrpose you were to be sworn do not understand the purport of that question. - - Mr. BROUGHAM objected to this. He thought the Solicitor- General ought not to be allowed to call on witness to repeat a conversation between her and Mr. Powell. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL did not wish to do that. He only desired the witness to state for what purpose the oath had been taken. Mr. BROUGHAM did not object to this, but to her being called upon to repeat the purport of the conversation which bad passed between them. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL , repeated this had not been called for. The question was then repeated, and the re-examination proceeded—l do not recollect what Mr. Powell said to me. As nearly as you can recollect and try to recollect with accuracy; bow lung was it ago ?—About two months, or something more, Was it after the Queen had arrived in England ?—Yes. About bow long after ?—1 'do not recollect nearly what time it was when the Queen arrived. But though you .do not know exactly when the Queen ar rived, perhaps you know bow long was it after the Queen's arrival, that you took the oath to the deposition 1-1 believe it was not long after the Queen's arrival. Had you ever heard of a Committee of the House of Lords ? —Yes. Was it after you had heard speak of that?—l think it was after. Before you took the oath was the deposition read over, or did you read it ?—I read it myself. Now, to go back for a moment to Naples! you mentioned that you saw flergami in a satin corridor there in his shirt, when you went out by the door ?—Yes. After you went out, did you observe any thing done at the door ?—I observed they shut it. Was the door shut or locked ?—ft was shut on the inside. Was it locked or not ?—When the door was shut I heard them give a turn to the key. • " • The Interpreter for the Defence rendered the answer, " the key was turned on the inside." The words were then taken down in French, " 071 ferMee, 4-e." How long was it after the arrival of the Princess that you began. to make the beds ?—Two months. Who made the beds up to that time ?—Annette Bryson. How long did you continue to make them ?—All the time I remained at Naples. How long did you remain there?—Three months. There you made the beds; how long ?—Three months. You have said Hieronymus's room door opened into the corridore; was that the small interior corridors, or another Another. Was it a private corridore, or passage ?—lt was a corridore which one passed to go to her Royal Highness's room, and by which Hieronymus, William (Austin), and myself, went to our rooms. You have told us that on your first arrival here you went by the name of Columbier. Why did you go by that name ? —ln order to he mare private and peaceable. Have you seen Hieronymus since the arrival of the Queen ? Yes. On the stair-case where we lived. Where was this ?-lt was when we lived in Dean-street. When did he call on yon?--He called twice the same morning. How long ago was that as nearly as you can recollect ? Seven weeks nearly. Are these the only times he called on you ?—No. You have heea asked about the Count Schavina.—When servants left her Royal Highness was it his business to give them characters? Mr. BROUGHAM objected to the question. What situation did Count Schavina hold ?—He was master of the ceremonies at the last part of his time. . . Mr. WILLIAMS said, that he never had cross-examined upon what situation the Count held ; he only asked who the Count was mentioned in the letter, and the Solicitor- General had no tight to re-examine in the course he adopted. A short conversation ensued, and the re-examination went on as follows : _ . . When servants left her Royal Highness was it the duty of any person to give them characters ?—Yes. Who was that person ?—Several times, I believe, it was Count Schavina. Was there a person in her Royal Highness's service whose duty it was to give characters to the servants of the Princess when they left 2 —Y es. Who was that person ?—Sometimes Count Schavina gave characters. Lord LIMERICK.—On your examination in chief you were asked, whether you could describe the situation in which you found the large bed at Naples, after the second night atter your arrival there, and you said you could not describe it; but on your cross-examination by the Learned Counsel on the succeeding day, as to the situation of the bed, you said you could describe it, 1 wish to ask what was the situation of the larger bed on the Morning after the second night after your arrival at Naples.—l said I could not describe it because I should have to make use of words that were not decent. I wish to ask and to press the question distinctly on the wit ness. What was the situation of that bed I—The bed cover was extremely pressed down in the middle, and there were things on.the bed which I bad never seen before. • The witness in answer to other questions went on to del scribe what she bad alluded to, - which for obvious reasons we omit, omit, except that she said there were large stains. - By Lord De DUNSTANVILLE.—YOU have said Hieronymus called at yotit residence in Dean-street I—Yes. Why did he come?—l4.• not know exactly, because he spoke to my sister. The Earl of LivEiiPoet. f 77,-Xop have said that the Princess's dress, when she was at,W:7heatre San Carlos., was mon strous—what did you meariT-74t was a large ,dress of common red stuff. • What shape was it in ?—lt had no shape at all. . During the ball at,the Barona, did you make any observa tion about the females ?—No. Earl GREY—When the Princess told you to take your bed out of her room, where did you spend the night?--I w:cat with my bed into the room where my sitter was. Did you go to bed ?—Yes, I. lay on my bed. Were you dressed or undressed ?—I was part dressed. When did you leave the inn, at what time?—About six hours after. You say, in the letter you wrote at Colombier, that the Princess had spies . about her, was that true ?—I only know the Princess said to we that she had spies and enemies about her. Mr. DENMAN read that part of the letter in which the wit ness stated that tlie Princess was surrounded lay spies. Earl GREY—Is not the assertion you made in the letter that the Princess's enemies acted with bitterness, and that she was surrounded by spies, founded upon some fact you know of, or do you mean it was merely written in consequence of what the Princess said ?—lt was only written in consequence of what the Princess said. What ! call Colombier the capital of Europe I—Yes, some times in joke, when wilting to my friends. And you then meant Colombier ?—I don't know now. You say in your letter you wanted money, is it true or not ? —I -.night not have money at home, but I could have got some by writing to my guardian. • Did you want money or not 1-1 do not recollect I had money at home ; but I could have got it from my guardian. Perhaps I had money at home. Do you mean to say that you Were supported by your father and mother after you were in the service of the Princess ?—I paid my hoard to my parents for my maintenance. Then you mean by the double entendre that you added what was false to what was true ?—I did not do that in order to say something which was false; but I did that because I wished her.to understand what I could not clearly explain to her, because I could not write openly and fully to her. What did you mean to wish your sister to understand by what you wrote ?—I wished her to understand, if she left the Ps incess's service, that there was a situation for her. What did you menu by saying to your sister that you could have a princely fortune 1-13ecause I wished my sister to un derstand I would pay her expences to England. And was it necessary to say the Princess was surrounded by spies, to snake her understand ?—Yes, I did it to make her understand that I would pay her expenses. I haVe always said I would pay her carriage if she left the Princess's service. Had you no other reason, but to make your sister under stand that you would pay her expenses I—And to inform her I could take her to England, and get a situation for her if she left the Princess.. _ You was afraid of your letter, being intercepted; that was the re ason y o u wrote mysteriously?—Yes. In a letter you were afraid of being intercepted, you would of course not put any thing injurious to the eln.racter 9f any One ?—I should not. • a read in p e thisrs; the House Gentleman why did you wish the names in t he letter not to be r it it mightmtgli t go to get into the his wife's e ars . You wi s h e d y o ur sister to remain in the Princess's service ? e :ema r ried,l was afraid ra and id —Yes. After what you saw at the Barone, which you have de scribed ?—x e s. Marquis BUC6INGHAM.—Did you receive a letter promising you a fortune if you came to England I—l received a letter from Sicily, statingif I cattle to England I should be placed advantageously. Then, in fact, no suck offer was made ?—Not exactly as stated in the letter; it alluded to the situation of governess. At.Chamitz, you say, the Princess had a silk robe on iu the day ; did she wear it at night?-1 cannot say. When the Princess went down to the bath on board the vessel, did you observe after any wet linen lying about ?—No, I did not; but the Princess had bathed, and advised me to bathe, as it would do me a great deal of good. Where did the'Princess take the bath I—l believe it was t a ken in the dining-cabin. L o rd'DEßßY—You say you wrote the letters to-your sister mysteriously, being afraid the letter would be int e r ce pt e d?— Yes. Had you acquainted your sister with the way.to understand this mysterious writing without 'any other person being ac quainted with it?-1 do not recollect ; hut the morning I set out I agreed we should put marks to our letters, that nobody should understand but ourselves. She told me she would put some marks at the bottom of the letter ) but I do not under stand what the marks were. Lord LIVERPOOI..—Do you recollect the Princess bathing more than once ?—Yes. On one occasion was the bath in the cabin ?—I know 1 bathed in the cabin, but I do net know whether,her Royal Highnesi did or not. Lord ELLENBOROOOIL—WIIO did you ,suspect would read your letters?—Bergami or the Princess. Did you suppose either Bergami or the Princess would be acquainted with the Swiii names mentioned in the letter ? "thought the Princess knew one of them. (Witness men tioned the name.) Why did you think the letters written to your sister would be intercepted ?—Because a letter my sister had put into the Pust-uffice at Pesaro to my mother, had been taken out and altered. You stated you saw the Princess come out of a room at Ca tania, where Bergami slept, was your sister in the room with you ?—1 believe she was, . How long had you been in the bed-room with your sister —I hal 4reft there all nigbradd awake abritit two hours. You say at General Pin,o7s you saw Bergami pass through the room „while you were in , e 4 a n d go into the Princess's room, bow long was it ‘liefoii- you: went to ileep;'aTter she passed through your room ?-4piarter or half an hour.. When yon saw Bergaiui come out: of his room in his shirt, at Naples, and go towar4 !he Pt ineess"s room; how fat dis tant from you w a s li e ?—About ten or eleven paces. Could Bergrimi hare eutered the Princess's room other wise iban by the door by which you escaped 1-41 e had no need to pass by that door; he might go directly to the room of the Princess, On board the polacca, when you passed from yOur cabin to that of the Princess, (during the voyage from Jaffa) ad. you ever see Bergami's bed made in the dining cabin?-1 have seen a bed in the cabin, but I cannot say whose, as other per soni slept there. Have you ever seen Bergami sleep there ?—Not after the return from Jaffa. The 11.14tquess of LANsnowN.—Can you point out to the House any marks in the letter which you agreed upon with your sister ? Here the SommTon-GENERAL stated that the .witness begged permission to retire for a few minutes. She was allowed to withdraw, and after au absence of half an hour returned to the Bar. The Marquess of Laysnow): then repeated his question. Did the witness ever receive a letter troin her sister, con taining marks which. they had agreed should he communi cated, for the better explanation of each other's correspon dence ?—I have only received one letter from my sister, and. I do not recollect whether there were any such marks in it. If the witness did not receive from her sister any marks agreed on between them, why did witness conceive her sister would'he able to comprehend the double meaning in the let ter, without some such marks as those they had agreed on!-- These marbi bad never been agreed on, as far as I can recol lect; my sister said she should write to me, and put a mark at the foot of her letter; I betieve she understood me, but I do not recollect why she did.so; it is so long ago I cannot recollect. • The witness has said she received a letter inviting her to go to England, where she might have the opportunity of being placed in a situation as governess ?—Yes. Was the letter anonymous or signed ?—The letter was trot signed. In what language was it ?—lt was in French. By whom was the letter delivered to you have already said it was delivered to me, but 1 do not recollect by whom. Can you say whether it was conveyed by the post or a mes scnger ?—I do not rocollect by whom it was conveyed. Can she say from whence it was dated 1-1 do not recollect. In point of fact, does the -witness know, qr bad she reason to know, by whom the letter was addressed to her?—At this moment I cannol recollect whether 1 bad an idea at that ma tialannntfrroemcolvlleict.l on it came. I never thought of it after, and I ot Dbe return any answer ?—I do not recollect making any answer.ser. Can the witness state any thing else in the letter besides an incitation to her to go to England as Governess ?—I not recollect whether there was any thing else. ' 7 ' Has the witness the letter in her possession now ? —I hare it not here, and I do not believe I have it at Colombier. bUrnt all My letters. F '!::Tlie Earl of LsunettetALe.—Was the invitaton in the ano -fli•itious letter an inducement for you to come to England as Governess ?—I had thought of it before. Did you ever get the place of Governess since you came to England ?—No. Was the letter directed to you or your mother ?—I cannot positively say; but I think it was directed to my mother. Hoiv many letters did your mother receive from your sister before you left Pesaro ?—I cannot say how many she received., After the voyage up the Levant, did Bergami sleep in the eating room and the Princess in a room adjoining?—Yes. You have said on'two occasions where both the Prince's and Bergami were in bed, you saw them speaking together; what did they say ?-1 cannot recollect what they said, but they were speaking together. Lord FALMOUTH—With respect to the doable enteudre is one of the letters, I wish to ask, whether the witness was sin cere in her phrases of the Princess, at the time she wrote the letter, and whether the whole was double entendre, or only passages in it ?—There were only some passages double enters. dre,because when I wrote the letter I was extremely attached to her Royal Highness, and willing to speak to her extreme goodness and kindness. The Earl of LAUDBRDALL—Was she sincere in those parts of the letter which speak in praise of the Princess ?—Speak ingof the Princess as she was good and patient, I was sin cere. Is there any phrase of this letter in which the witness was not sincere ?-1 do not recollect whether all was sincere, bds the greater paat was. Earl DARNLEY.—When did her, attachment for the Prin• cess cease ?—This attachment ceased when I heard several things said of me in the house of her Royal Highness. Was it in consequence of the cessation of that attachment the witness is here to-day to give her evidence ?—No. What was her motive—what her inducement to come here? —I was asked to come to declare the truth. By whom ?—By Mr. Sachi, on the part of the Commis sioners. _ _ Lord MoasToN asked whether the water in the bath, on board the polacca was fresh or salt ?—The witness answered, I do not know whether it was fresh or salt. After a few other questions, the witness was ordered to withdraw, and their Lordships ad. journed at four o'clock to Monday. From the LONDON GAZETTE of Sep t . .; [This Gazette notifies the return of the Honourable Johts Jocelyn, in the room of the Hon. R. Viscount Jocelyn, itow Earl of Rodeo, as M.P. for the County of Louth.) BANKRUPTS. T. Evans, Birmingham, builder, Sept. 14, 15, and Oot. 14, at eleven, at the Wolseley Arms Inn, Wulseley, StaffOrdt, shire. J. P. Drummond, London-street, merchant, Sept. 5, 12 : , and Oct. 14, at twelve, at Guildhall. W. Cruickshank, Of London-street, merchant, Sept. 5, 12, and Oct. 14, at twelve, at Guildhall. • ' W. C. Wilson, London-street, merchant, Sept. 5, 12, and Oct. 14 at twelve, at Guildhall. [Dividends,' Ste. To-roorrow.l To the PRINTER of the SHREWSBURY CHRONICI.B, Sln,—The opening of the Ports for Foreign Oats, is a circumstance which, I trust, will open the eyes of my brother Farmers in the Maritime Counties in Wales - viz. Merioneth, Carnarvon, Cardigan, Flint, Denbigh, and Anglesey ; and that they will see that bona fide returns be made_ of whatever Corn is sold. If a trick can b;ik played in Oats, why not in Wheat ? The loss which Ireland will sustain by the recent mat nceuvre, is very great. Bat Farmers may thank themselves. If they will not look to their own interests, they must continue to become the dupe* of speculators, who raise fortunes in a fe r w months. I do not believe, for instance, that even in the markets of Shrewsbury or Chester, the Farmers ever care about making a return of the prices they sell at ; but they leave it to be done by millers, or by any person interested. , - Let Farmers inquire more, and examine more, for. themselves.----Your's, Aug. 27. A WELSH FAAMER. 6. aa In the Gazette of Saturday a reward is offered of 100 guineas for the discovery ofperson the , who attacked Dr. WAKE'. 1-, of Argyle-street, and set fire to his house, with a promise of a free pardon to any accompli ces makin g such dis -oai ng m i an of the n the covert'. The late Vice - Ad miral FENDE A who died a o in the 73d year of his age, had ,been Royal Navy, and w a s th e l as t re m crew who circumnavigated the Globe with Captain WALL4cx„ ... - t'