The Sun. — London, England, 1820-12-06 00:00:00

' '*(")"'ittior , • s.• • • —.A... ; - .4. ••;: a: . i, . 1 . . . . .. . .! :.: .. . , -........*, . • - 4 ..• „ . . . _ , _ - ma. , tv,x- -- .• : , ~ ‹., . ..-k ;., i . , ~ -- , • , ---, - - , -. 4_, , , , •; • „.i• ~ , f ' k "..'% f . .." . ' ~ rl i . . kil --;_:-. .• •,. 2,-.,:= _„ . , • . . , r. ,• , .. - // t 1 ' . - ' 7. -- r i r. ': N 'X''''' . • - . tlk,.. ' = 7 ...,...,..„ ..,, . • x, ~.. .....N. ~.,,.. , ~.., •.. ...... y_.•,,,-;,„• . td„.y . -.7.- 4 , ..„. ... . .. , ~,,,,„, &-' - .4 .- ____'-er----;, - ........Z%--;-' - .......„ 7,,,_. - / i ,...z,,,,...„---....07-0,,,.....-- , , / 1. 7 W113 ER 8823.] liT 11_, D NE SP A OFFICE OF ORDNANCE, July 31, 18 : 2 e. ,•',, " 'PUBLIC are hereby informed • that Thirty-sev en PLATES of the ORDNANCE SURVEY -41 GRE AT -BRITAIN ; carried on under the Superintendence -441. the late Major General WILLIAM MIJDOE„LL.D. F.R. ' 4" A .S., are b ow and'tCat'l PRESSIONS from th em are on Sale at the ORDNANCE MAP' OFFICE„ iw the, of LONDON, and .also at.WILLIA FADEN'S, s.e 7 I,r aPhee to his Majesty, arid Agent to"the 'Board_ of Ordr • fiance; at CI-lABING-CROSS• - TSa'Se x hese PLXPES • c O n t a in the Gounties' of Kent,' Essex, s ""ts, Dor'Set, Devon; 'and CoenWati, and ptopors o — i n s Of S o M erset, Surrey, Peinbroke; Cardigan, Carmarthen , 7 cantlebordrigr, wilts, erks,. Middlesex, Hertford, and P„ ia . Pa rt IX; ..eontainti -nea'rly* the wliMe- of Pembrokeshire; ` h irortio ns ' of * theadjacentConr?tey, ". POtions' o f *th e a dj acent C ou n t e y„ \Va.4 published on the at tgost,. I 81a, a.rul ,as the Wo ;Is .is.sti LI. in. progress,, rs.:t (.., "*Lin4 to - the Ofir,inal Design of giving - a curopletit Map or Britain, siiion a, Scale of. one 'inch to a Mile. the ,;I'lization of the future parts will follow .as fast as the na -I.* °f such a Work -. Wilfactruit, increasing the an " ••.4 Expense. Cent le meri . wishing procure a Map of the Country stir. ;;A"din at g their psen habitations, may, by application to Mr, wiII(ER, the Ordnance Map Office (where an Index Map r be s heivii)-seleet any sheets tbey please, for that purpOset All Letters I.ft , flus subject, addressed-to-Mr. Baker, unilei ;e re, to the SeeretOz rot the*Boaed. of Ordnance, Pall Mall; tll be attc,tided - to. - Ey Order of the Board, whO pay itENDY ' MOINTY are Plc c lestietttully infornied. by - ..101-4NiCNEti and ttcr --t OILLY, that in addition to. the articles contained in List.last published, they have added the (callow-. i!tlj " '0 thc:eS Farifify use, SOIfN'JONEti • W e . I cif e selltng on more reasonable Terms titan any ether • .-,tbouie in England --- LA W INT ELLIG ENCE. COURT' 01 7 " CH AN . CP:II,Yi DEC. 5. This being, the -first seal-- after Michael Mas Term, the'Lorw,CHAN-chtLon came into Court at an early hour. • - . . 'SER"GISSON' V: SERCISSON. Air- HART atldresised his Lordship at consider 7 able length, stating various objections to - the ver -diet . stiVen in this -cas'e, which was sent by his Lordship to be tried in the Court of King's Bench, to'astertain the legltirnacy of one of the parties. " The Learned Counsel wished the case to be roviewed by his Lordship, and the verdict set aside.—The . LORD 'CHANCELLOR considered it was au unusual' application, but he would- see the Chief Justice.to-rnorrow., when every'thin3 should be done calculated to promote the ends of justice.. The Court was excessively crowded, parti‘u= larly with ladies. _ COURT OF KING'S BENCH, DEC. 5 LIBEL.-CLEART il. COBBE.TT. '• This 'was an action *brought by the plaintiff "against Cobbett; for. the ,publication of several - papers alleged tiO be • libels and 'slanders .in " Cobbett's Weekly Registers'' of the Bt.ll of, November, the sth' of December, the of I)ecetriber; and:" thec,2sthof December, 1819. Mr: CHITTY opened the pleadings. Mr: `Bitoudx..4l - then addressed the. TurY.— His Learned- Friend, he said,. had pu.t :them in possession of the nature" of the action. The plain tiff, complained :that Williath Cobbett, in order to bring' him into contempt and hatred; had pub. llshed the hadbrOught before - - . them a man who, abeve ail 'other's, was able, as a writer, to attack and injure " - private diameters. He could only say hi's' talents were _increased by zeal; and a scritpulousiiesSin pursuing the. object Sitigidd out: The'plaintilf, *Whoa' Mr. Cobbett had'pnrsued With 'go much* ardour, was . a Gen. tieman' from: the' sister kingdom, a person of good fami.lj and " respectable' situation Since hiS to in. 2 : England he *had. .been 'qualify ing himself to becOme a practitioner Of: the "law: lie had also 'taken part . in the .. politics of' Major Cart Wright, who; during a long and - laborioug life", 'had alWays . been' firm and perse - Vering'in • consistency. Mr. Cleary being an" EleCtdr of . Weslminster, he applied at the last Geneial EleCtiOn to exercise' his franchise and support the interest of , one of the Candidates. Another Candidate was Mr. Mint; and it having pleased* that person to attack M. Cleary, the latter_ took the license Of reading a letter deli-. vered to - hith .frorna person Who received it . from . the -defendant: Thatt - letter - Mr. Cobbett had . thought . proper to"describe to be a forgery. The letter was written by the defendant in the year 1868,. and reflected on . Air.*Hunt, who certainly had*a:right tO'Complain of the contents ; :but why Mr:* Cobbett should complaint he knew not. Mr. Cleary did" not; say one Word" `'against Cob heft: - The'llefendant - liact'SVOken harshly of Hunt, and'stibsequently had 'praised him. This did 'not -excite Much surprise in those' who knew Mr: Cobbett All Who - had the - pleasure of see ing the exercise of . his - talents,' - and of reading -not -for 'years wild 'months,' hut for weeks -and days-i- must :be4ware , of . the sudden changes itrthe political-character of that gentle man: It = was. not therefore. extraordinary that he : should -be changeable with respect to Mr. Hunt, Here JustlCE,olserved,. that Mr. Brougham vi oakd b'e more in prder if he ei4otined his observations to the libels. ' I 11. H. CREW, Sec. - . ~ •s: cf., S • • x J"v Root 3 4 per lb. , • ,r„ ocolate, PW3 4:` 0 per ib. 4..t t .. ... s , • _ ,•,, N)r• Hans Sloane s ( ' 64 coat-611), of tbe fitieSt finality - 10 °c .a. Ntbs' i • e,,,,, / 1)t. 2 10 d er lb. ree of dint c'oalit . A 2 -1),r,. - Y • '3''' per lb. • ~rt -iornilv flowers ... • f2' .Bper lb. • ra . : 4 ' ll of Ta i t at , ' 0 per lb. '.• ......7 "A:e of A/rci, ov i es „, •• l'' 2. per btit.. zittst India Rice titer ior Wine§is Pickles , Sz:c. . 0 8 pirlb. ' • ' • ./ ja, • d eY ... ,", " ' li glitsg ... • ... • • • ll 0 per lb, (•, 3 r • .. . .pi ck , .P , 1.1211C11 ' . / I 0 per hot. , ii,,,,,‘l of roost sorts 'S ae ' ~. a l lot." '• • Agfirt h •• • • • • .-•— . Vi,:;2" 1,1 Pearl Barley for Straps._ - 0.. 4 per lb. 1 ./itt ( ;' - ;;,Tiirragolt 1 0 per hot, , s . , ~ i nstill t d 1.,,, ze jj .1$ 0 8 - per lb. 4 Y(.fr,, JY.l: , :eats7 Too:roes ..',....,,.. 4 ,( . i each, • . ,• !Nt , c . ' - "nP NI ,4tletl 91(1 tifd torf. per Jul ~..,.."' N :llr - ir," " 4 l,s • ?s. 6(1. Moulds I oa. Wilx . 445. per zett., r , - t " r i ,trl ii . di,i,ei,i..‘ will eili4et've, • tbat the ''abOre (14,•. ,! , .re ...(• it ........1411e4.1.1r 'Sit t -urit ion „ ipc ing - i - trt ie eft. sa b n i . : irti c,f Atati what iiiv Wholesale HOU9CS charge for t he . • `v . . ‘lll ' k nit r iSi libertyto calfat MADEIRA, %Va l r4ritrd to Sail in all Itecember. Sir I P.' I-A ' USIIINGTON" tki-EXANI)EIt - SCOrls, ' ' ' • ' • • • ' Conn»ntler, lying in the City Canal. But. 4 • tto:tii-6tcr tons: was built . and fitt e d up f or th e E Is t I n dia Trade ; bas very tor •AectirztniUthitioas for , Passengers; add carries a . .11t tev ; r efight or POctt4tt,'lt'pply - 10`G'.. 14'; N.‘A GIIIBO; 4t, St. Yii.se d ; ixe ; or to cUitiAN-G DOME.oeorge7 °fliliard-street. M r., Baot,lottam . ,. then observel, that the 'letter containing ihe fi rst' ptiblished ou,the 4 21 . 1-1 of November, 1818, in a-ill - timber Ae4;ister; written in'America, but seat over And published in. this country. Speaking of the letter read by Alr. Cleary, the defendant said On substance), •-• , -"l'cielare. • YOU hive'pittili'shed a forgery. I declare it to, be a forgery. I accuse Alreleary before the people of A tne ric.aond before the people . of . Xnglang, of having forged this Tettei.; Or What ,is the lame thing , reeeiving it from a man whirl 'knew had:fOrged . himelof fraudulent purpeScs many times." Eiere Mr. J3roughain again adverted to what tie called the perseveritig severity..of Mr..Cobbett, who never sight;` fora ihofnent,' Of the Object within his grasp. Having' • accomplished his' object,' tie never let go his gripe, but, fasTened on and.,l.acer - .ted, his victim—, Again and again he had repeated the charge of forging against' the' plaintiff. Mr. Tirofighaui then adverted to a passage in the Regi,ter, stating, " Oat, wheu Alt Cleary rode orithe white charger, he should have had a pillion fur his Ihrgirig f - fe'ibeti* iittrudticed certain verses, in which the plaintifrwas ' libelled', and ;obit:reed; that it was vain to take upthe . time of the Jury with the, statement, of all the'llbels, but beMiglit say what he had uttered was not the Worsupart irt - t:lie libel. • There - WAs'atiot her passage.',The'de fendant, speaking the attributed to th e charge of forgery for the.b . ase,st of motives—for lucre, of gain, - receive Money - frorn Sii'Francis Btirdett, a wealthy employer. Having read all the Ir,w,ages, be asked what the Jury moth' have felt had they been the, vietiins.,of such libels ? 'T h ey Would observe, that - Where a r u n chose to lavistrinderinite - cluirges; he' 'could' trot he obliged to prove them. N'agne, c harges admitte d of no itpitaie:ai.,?4, ho t . there was 'a clear 'charge in this case of forging.a letter.— If- the lettetWas - not'the - 'Of' Mr, ('.,,#,ett, he b,,d th s oppm inn:4y of putting a ; justification on t ret:bril. 'What had he done ?• 1 -Onlj so that nte,',Jury of (fie - frilly - the issne pleaded, which WAS' immure t han-sayinrietrat , Mn: Cleary' said was riot tree. Ile knew not what the tine of Cobbett'siletence 'Might be'; hut if they' heard one topic I:ittertyht the Pri'SS)heheseeletted I liektilry to hear him, - foittie'sake of Mr. Cleary; lint riuhian,wohld tie insane ehougir.to say,the _Press, in the, utmost limit of liberty, could, allow him to attack pri-. vale character. All political subjects might be open tti'Vieir inerctiVes. 'They' might'use butfelorter . y, or sareatm. They might vary it from moult!. to morols, day to gay, and With tlie"rapldit that hi ht succeeds' darkness; hist they must .b'e thigh-titre 'limit. 'Fbey rtlutf norolie ehllitnny with iiti,Ptthit IrM c. tllbbett perstuttle the Jury that be Might to be ye'rmiliticit to ;Mark 1i irate chtratters, ihen they give ak'sittall'il'ainaii,es a; they' couldgive ; tttit if it tic; oared to them that the defendant bag given a claim to Mr. Cleary,. they wool, award that commendation Oue.tu his ' t n. • j i eitcv of • • . , called;l\roilheed hhhhle•cif lets"; lie knew the tfefendaires hand=terltin Ile received a lette't front hint, dated the' I ill) • 'Examined by 51r,,colimErr,—Never wit's" tftlfettgattei elt!rit —he was his agent. It was not a private letter. I,:lirst vie-t6i.t it to 'Witness herd a Ahiuher of let te •ab Mit ;$OO, whlc it he - rkeived fiotu the defendant. 'Moly P ÜBLICATIONS. . ---....---- . T r ' This. Day'. setts , potilisbetl,iitr Ftslo.. price £IS. . P r i , h l t CitlikCll and ihe CLERGY ; 'ex11..7 Art% i6 rig th e oitli4;nions of SOciety..LifefattirV; dm/ the ''.1.1. t ' ilis u ti-_, l !,'. e : E criesiastical Orders, and the advantages of an , c 1 eriestliod. • Prii . ,.,GRORCiE:EDMUND- SHUTTLEWO-Ttfl 'lll.4, 4. ,".• 'for 1 , . C. and J. Rivington, 62.„ St. Paul s Church. - ---- . .__ . `" l s> l ll'aitiltiOtplace, Mll-Mall. --- b ~, =r 1,- ‘ots.Day was - pnblished, VriCe ss'. in boat - e 't on fine Paper, the Fourth. Edition, with Addi.- . .• , riiiiii. of '• UAL' . of INSTRUCTION and DE- A .I lAN .1,.4it./,;(1,-;1,:c.?:,;,,;,.. 7 6, , i the 'SA , .., Cli ; -‘ . N: i i.E . N . T of the LORD'S SUP- T ' • *.. ., 1 , tee Sermons on the Su lied. I .l ' u etinnntinion ServiCe . ,. With Noles. , ...let.ds of Self Examination. .. , -!, l z.tiri and Practical Instructions 'for Young Persons. • -- ii. '"elect Texts of Scripture for Meditation ; and ‘ .'ritvers suitakte'to the occasiorr. -•• . • , . 41Or„. Preacher tin: Rev .. 1 10H 1-IEWf,ETT,i.D. Ing Preacher at-I . lm nundling. Hospital; . ii.utthßector of 7 .I, ',.. Hilgery, in Norfolk. r s ard ri , * t . et! for.F. C'. - an.t3.•lticington, an.t 3..lticington, 6.2; St:"Patirs ., Clitit-ch 'll ........._ 24,"" 3, Waterloo-Place, Pall MET,II ; Longman and Co : 'Ater-row ; and tratt haed arrilSon, PiCciditty. THE AdAVY. th: lo lidaY (the• 27th - inst.) the first 'thrtston' of 1 1.11 35 , 111 Reginavnt proceeded down the- river in I): ° L e the steam boats, .and embarked in our liar f 10r Ba oc s. he.rernaind I etniinrk Ton sarn e .i s t an d, as &c oon, as the tr:dmspOrts'for e a/1 , 1. .7) 11 1g them shall have.-arrived.—(Co;* Chr ) 0 . 4 Avi i ; two :troops- of the. ]4th Light Ditgoons, 11,-e'en h atefor:some . th-ne past been Statioxn‘d . 4114 ba rracks at Brighton, we expect, will to-day Ivatrejh th rough this - town on their route tolhe-east. C.--7(..Leztes Jou.rhat) sk„ a , s -t Mond a y Li eutenant- G enera l,T orreM th e 'ted on the - Downs, .near . the Horse' 13arraCkg, tti 85th regiment of infantry, and.two. troops of Ar u b a t h Light Dragoons,. and expresAed . his:•ap fiatilioli. of their. high - State. of discipline . in very aring terins.---( Brighton paper.) • I i s :" "is morning (Saturday; 2d 'inst.) the first' di silcioil ° f 7th Regiment of Foot (Royal Fu tl,,:'rs) from Ireland, passed through this city on rOtite- to Edinbtirgh.- , ---(6 1 / a sgo TO • Cottrier.) • c21,,11 n on-commissioned - ollicer And, -.Ptiv4tes • s q s . t NOrth - British - Ftisileers, haire . auto remitted .a day's pay in - aid of the "criptiOn'for the NationarAlonurnOttAif Scot.- A . 4 4d. (C a tedon ian Mercur.y.) , DEC EMBER 6, 1820. were all.; in Rlr. Coh,l,..ett's hand-writing. were rinhlle and-private 'otters. Ita,d, a long arbitration proceeding With !lie defendant respecting accounts in 1818. He did not s:IY• on that cceasion, he.wiltihlegpsise the defendant's letters, defesidant consented to pass his accounts. Ti' a.ss'ertion was an lUvention the•part of the. defendant, tie received the letter which Mr, Cleary read in , 1308. In 1818 witi irss l o w a , ;lA, .Place,- Charing Cross, cue of Sir Fr..riris Bur•lcit's coremittee,-irt•conseqsonee of •sfrtne praise which Mr. 1., obbett .11:asi bestowed on Mt. Wan in his ter. , He 'considered it. necesSarl to shore that Commit t*: ,what, sort of. a person tb-e defendant was.. There were twenty or thirty .persons its ,the .room _ when he gave, the letter. He was present upon it stand. opposite the Hus tings when the letter was read by- Mr. Ciesuy, hut be only beard part 07 it. Hes never ,e,arried•tisc defendant's lwi vate letters to ,Nlr. Liroolis its •tbe Strand. Sir It. Phillips was iu the room when, he gave the letter to the Committee. Abelvtier was put-between two glasses. that all-persons might Ire•coi4kinced it was. not •a , forgery, Cleary was' not,preseat when tie delit'ereel the letter fu the Committee. He did not recoHiet wlietlit'r Mr`. Cnbbett, the yonter, exe presaki a desire to. him to see else later: He latard the Da fenelanCs son wisheit to:see it, and he gave directions. to pre. vent : the son.frour surslchi,ug, isaway.. Hr did not sbew the Pelenslant's letters to the late Mr. Whithread. He had shewn the letters to Mr. Brougham. Ile never eartied' the Defendant'fr—ps'ivate letters ; tor : the.-Attorney and Solicitor. • General. Mr. Hurst said Bis!sops Walden was nut tlie,posti !nark 'on the letter, and he exhibited the letter With that amrk. He ben red the repOrt of the letter which. appeared • in.the Papers after Mr. Cleary read it on ha•tings,.to he 'the best report of the origimil document that the Gentlemen cmsnected with the Press could collect i. their notes. He did nit take a book, containing the letter, to Brooks, but it was takers to the Cuurt,of King's Bench. It was ins the hands of Mr. Gurney and Mr. Scarlett.. - • Mr. Paul said he was acquainted with the Wand...writing 'of Cobbett. The letter in question was the Laud-wliting of,Mr. Cohhett.. ._• . _ fir. Place deposed, he was present on the Hustings at the clection'of 1818. The witness looLedat the letter, and stated that •it was the :same that was ..put into the- bands of "Nlr: Cleary. 'His mach was upon it.. He did not-hear it read. .: Cross-exancined by Mr. COBHETT—fIe said he received the 'letter_ (Com .Wright,.. and gave it .to .Cleary. gave Mr. Cleary directions to read the whole letter. He hod seen in Puliiical Acgi,rler some Comments on the reading:of. the letter Thedetendant said,it.was a forgery. He wished the whole letter to- be:pronittlgatcd. Acting as In honest man, wishing.to present Mr..Cohbett .to the world in . hii true colours,. be desired Mr.,Cleary.to read the whole lettet.• It was read upon the Hustings for. the purpose a getting Mr. Cobbett excluded from the Rump Committee. He was ex= cluded, and no communication held with hitn after by the Committee. . - Mr. ‘k illiatn Adams was one of the Committee in the Elec tion of ISIS.. Hcreinionbered a letter was read on the hust ings by Mr. Cleary. He had. no ttubtlt. was the letter. pro duced. 'Fie did nollimilw Mr. Cobbett's hand-writing. Cross-exatnimed by Mr. Couarrr.—,He was one of the , itnmp Committee.. 'He was one who advised the' letter to be rcid, Mr. Hula baring attacked. ti - re.clttacter of Sir F. BM - - dot. lie .did Not know whether the vliole of the letter was :read. He did not know the name'of the person to who'll the letter, was written, was ,merotionefl. .Hte did . not recollect. Whether he saw the publication of the letter next day. Here Mr. Cobbctt said, -So, Sir, after you bad disapproved of my style, and. public letters, you took the liberty of first reading my private, letters, aud,then exposing them. to -the world) — Tile witness said, he did not cote der the letter read by Mr. Cleary a,private letter, The Committee, in his opinion, were not restrained frOm making ans• Use of it. Thejetter was then, read, was in substance:— Dear. send Ire the Gosport Mail a parcel of copy—, go to the Committee. Let us stiffer no little slights to inter fere with our .public. duty. I will be in town on Satureay night, and if I tindall good men and true, we shall. make such strait' as has not for Bo we time been made. All the Gentfethen I meet speak in Sir F. Burdett's praise. So de terinined for :calling for.o purgative of that .Housr, that I would present.a l'etitiorrmyself. There is one •Flunt, a raistol man, beware of him. .14 rides about the 'country with a, w—. Hare nothing to do with him," /lc. Mr. Adams then said, ht dill. nut suppose that a part of the letter was intended to be ,published to the world:, With re spect to Hunt; he did not think Mr. Cohhett had any_ objec tion to have it promulgated. Ile did nut know whether the Romp Committee ordered the whole. of the letterfu be read. The letter,was first brou4 - lit to thcConfatittee in 1808. did not see that it Was necessary to use it before 1816. Then, in consequence of the attacks on Sir F. Bartlett, he thnught it proper the letter should be read—,Had never seen any other lettefi, written by . the defendant. He advised the read ing of the letter, so far as it related to Ilnnt. Had never seen Ihe.‘Oinle of the letter at Brooks's in 1818, before it was taken to the Hustings. 1-1 e did not tell Cleary to suppress the name of the person to whom time letter was sent. . William Jackson was acquainted with Cobbett in 1817. — That was thetime he went to Ammica.. He received from Mr. Cobbett before l.c went front this country the manuscript of his Farewell Address. He received a letter from him at the.same time, , dated 26th March, 1817. The letter being produced, the defendant examined it, and wished the whole to. be read. 'The letter was then read. It stated that the ptiblication of his. Register was tree front offence against the law.: It. would produce a muttialprofit. It ,warne4l Jinn to avoid get-: ting into prison; if he did, little busioes• would he done. The witness, in consequence of that letter; published the Farewell Address, :and, continued publishing . . The; - first he pol,lislied was Np.. 14, of- Vol. 32, on the, 12tli of July, .1807. He continued p'ublishingtill.lhnitary 1919, and accounted fur the profits to Mr. Cobhett and his for his use, Here Ir.:l3flottnft,pd :pointed out theseveraipublittations made by the NyitrlCSl, .which were .read.. ,The.first was : the New York letter, bearihg dale the 6th of, I)eceinhei, 1818; it declared the letter,read by Cleary to be a - forgery. Secoitdly, the attack oft Cleary, which accused him of forging the letter; to obtain reward from Sir F. Burdett. 'flintily, the libel stating remarks on Cleary, Mounted on a white charger. The libel 111 Verse, Sc. , - - • • Mr. CotsuErr.then.cross.-examined ;% r. had eat down With him in a room in Landon.. He dill. not now whether Lord -Cochrane was present . . He did rrotitnow he first saw bit», inn believed it was in the .King's,BenGh....-4 The witness went to hihiat 11?tley,lvitii a message I - 5,0110,0rd C o eh'rarie. Ile ilid Oct tell him on that occasion that lie had advised Lord Cochrane to escape from prison, - he told him the contrary. , The CIIIEFJ;;STICE oberveo that this was irrelc,vant,.. COBBETT continued .ha erosS:tlXdlliipatiow.—Thewit ness _did not recollect that - Lord Ctichcane.said-,"•Jackstaht• 1, haze reFti t rimien'ded you to ("ulthettas a faithfitt,map o l' Llncl Cochrane said; he liaA no doubt he (Nr..lacktony would act like ail hunt:storm). Th e lett e rs for publication in the'Rogitt," hy.lurst. , The witness I'4l a•ciiss;retionaiy poweiruas to what he might publish,, ,l le Tec.eired letter ~-stating ,that the whole resvonsibility'restc'd with kin-Ist:lf. had not the letter with him. In eolisequetite of his resporiiihility hell4'.: ceiveil letters front t he„Pefendani. . fie tiati,!the ig•tght„of,ri: article„.but,htsd nu ..r.,ig . ta to. i risert, t , ! Jig : made alteratiuni in some of the-writings. lie lift out feir= tile.'" in the coini4ragie farce: Ile ance.lielc4a..einis.oltatidil" Major,' Car-tivrght, when ;tat - shirts r. t iocitt4 Upon one of the It,was an attack . si r, F, s , ic s s. , Vurilett';' Most' of it wils I.ititilisfied. lie did 'not arty alteration in any particular, Register,,,l l lllrsS it rtas,tO.tuffro sortie Ohce.lte,ipscrted a wh01e.,11 % ,„t m .., Fie diale not rtceive, frak :America. The ••,,i c ; ( - 0 the bt;nd-writ;ng of ii r. Colitiettror his 50th He eou3 d cot swear that tie letter fsoto the New 7 0 ,- 4 , - 4 ;lec4l4e,CHtlows , iii the defendant's It i,yas pr.int e. th, j.k1 ,,4, 444 „ c fruit) the tlefefitiant,. 'l l e no , sWot'e that.4bad not rik. least tlnobt. it -come from the .d e lciulatit.:4trAtti'cl . ,se e n a pamphlet wriltelt to,Mititir„Cvt wright it was nit into his hinds.—bitl you write ~ray „part o f th a t -?—'111-e'i,iiiines.s'olijeCted to ansWt rhattities.titin. . . Tbe".l"tYtinC . s t aid 'be could not be compelled to answer any lustion which ii.i set affect t, itself„ Th.e ; lieu said, be wrote not:, i fi4• bellous on r. • lie admitted - be: bad', .lut.itaillt to (-trivet and restrain the pltl4lic t ilitin, by a lf:per letittant. The letter was not destroyed: He remeMliered Iteing at,- Brt.inlfw's',,in the `:rand, With Virri . .gitt,,:fiitifie recollect there was a bitittiptt it,,P--Mik4ls in. It was about the time Of' the White Horse klection• He [PnIcE did not ch e w anY , :of Registers.ttfereshrPnlilfstik.thent. Will,you swear that you any instinctiinis horn la t e to publish any one of these • libels'? They eathe to ine "for kilt lication; sometimes in the CobbettYaiiii-soaki , times iii the wri.tiii.g of his song 1 He ;tot ,recollecti-treeiv— ing, any instructions from the Defendkukt far the publication of the printed copy • sent, 'as fait , of Neil , York -Evolikp,. Past. He bad asserted tiniefic ritlilishediti*Wark for the Defendant's betiet, himself being• a participator in the tievetit. The aceounti relating to. printing and puti:ish ing were kept hy , ltiniseif,- 'He nothing of' •Cleiry's - ile-, sign to get tlie Defendant. 4rresttld on the Saturdai.,night. He never heard ..Cieaty say he wished tO have the pefen.claut en - Saturday night. ' • ~11.0-examinetiby Mr. ISitounna:it--clie Klliirse said be (the defendant) hail tisver complained or objected to-the iissm'tion of the articles. The . defetitlatit tben, through the medium of the Judge, ,asked if. 110 hiia 4: rce •objt.cted to. - any alteration made by the witness..?--The answer v.:as • , the ilefelidant'i printer, stated, that the manuscript ot the libels remainedin liii•possession a C ‘,11:1 - lible4ifuei - • It , w`lsl`,,ni given up ti.) Mr. AVirt, (;olthett, Cross 7 extnitted by Me. Cottam—He said he knew Mr. Cobbett's writitig; had seen I; im write an 'order to Tioper":ind -Fry,•stationeysi• tor:papf.,r. • He believed the aniunieripi was • in the-wf•itingl6'h.Cobbott. - Mr. Co a B n'rr then addressed the ;fury: hlr.l3rough a nthad described hint to he a 'cruel, hard, bloody-taiiittleit nian. It was tint -wonder fal to tg -Barrister like NI r:l3fiig ham thus to.prefer thafg.es. He told the Jury that.he••(Mr.,Cabitett) was -tti he dreaded - f,jr Set - opt:lot - IS invective. He was de scribettio he'a snail- Wanting --feelitig, shOrt - Ibe - Worst of -Wieners. - •:Ile• hadAteett writ-er, aftflitever 'before had. tO defend an action for libel, mail this action contineked by einistarators. lie never had but oite . action in Arneficait hat waslor something lie Wrote' againsi . a•-•iuti,tteon, who proved aloss in - his practice t Wenty-five tlionstad dol lars. He. paid it, hut he rescued the-Public from this doctor's abominable lancet. 'ln twenty-eight yeatilie' had iib've'eliad ;fttore_thon two actions. -Thet - e were frs - i• csettivtUctors - ot•ttutlic works could say as much. Not • even y'be,Evangelica f f% oinecolidnettn s. The Attorney-General had in osecuted him,but he sustained no harm. He went into prison sclund;Corne Out - sound,. and his-seven yours recogliization had' expired. If be •turned his eyes to The Times, The.Chrenti o r e, a - Ild Ediu burgh Review, he should find several libels had been milked. - In some instances t he-libeller had crept out oldattge"'"rqihtsse amiliationswhich Gentlemen of the North -.knew so - Well,haw to make, while stupid fellows, like lion-self and- others,. iii London, xan :their beads' into gaol.: Mr: Brougham bid de signated this as a slanderous attack on a !nit-ate person. •Mr. Cleary was.no privateiters , ,m. - Major Cartwi who had bras'. in Court alI the daY, appeared to the witnesses' - hox', -he could' have proved what Mr.' Cleary' Was, • it boil' been. said Mr. Cleary was connected with - Major. by ;then was not the Major called to prove who he was? Mr. Qicat was described to be a deserving youOg man, overflowing with • love of Reform. The Plaintiff was in • fact tra'pyival,,e-per _son. He came over from his 'native country in I ni - 4,- - and was ntaile Under Ss ; etary to the Hampden Club.. Davis .-was.the SeeretarY. Had Ilse' Major' been - pm' in the to)tfte' - ivt;'itlfi -have proVed how far the plaintiff seas the A pdst/e'of ReforM.. When lie stood forward to rsupport -of the.. Major-at,the Eleettou, be found 'the Major wouldmot do, and then he was for liaiingt h e Minor, Sir F.Burdelt. quarr'elled H u nt. '.Afterwards fte went - to the Romp Cohnnitt CC", whe'-re gut.t he letter from Wright, and_then made an attack -upon - hinc((;oh- : • hest), who had ion Wog to do with the Elyetion;a.mi was in_ America. •-Thie-fitet and last part of the letter WAS ic ft out.' fie also iuppresseci twit date of the letter, if he,liad* nOt ttd - d - e so, every boa) , would have known it was written ten veurstl:eteirc Mr. Cleary produced it. Heleft out the name of ttie itei-ion to whom. itwas addressed. --No tmint cetuld hesitatertoAayli Mors a shameful transaction. He (('obbett) notlitiowingvvhen..: he ttt-- tcr so produced could have been written, - declared .:it• I . orgtry; He,saill so stiTh It wits it forgery' in Law mt nut- p.arr. , of .t......41.w.:44mint.......111.ey want eel Cu rtrerrr i K, on Haut. lie stated in his letter that Hoot was liviog, with a Lady, and they used -his letter • for the worst 'of -1111'.Vri vale slander: IYould any but the Rump • Committee - cern- _ bine .for such a _purpose . Although Learned Gentlemdts passed over the breach of confidence, he - defied the-Lealtied G eh it et riprn.,- with- Ail his . classification, to the crime of the Rump Committee trout that eommittetiqq taio persons whom the people.of Dover wanted to throw ata th•e sem. 4ite - Lvartied iitlenran had held op - Baron Cnitp;:etia, Vimicarti, and other., as , being base •wretciftiS,'lrit:wl.ett i, ad they done more than tlte.parties arrayed asainst, ?•• ";'he Learned Gentleman might hays - the benefit of 'bis +.-but I will also hare the- beneSt;"-sitid ty;y . When -Mr.-Brougham: told him ' , Mr-Cleary was a student at law-he was alarmed-It appeared he had been.gulty Of crushing - a lawyer in the eg,.;.• Could there h e fence. laugh.)—He -was accused 'of dtring` hint divers wrongs• Ott ! it was said, persons will--not- now speak.lo lizas s But what did the plaintiff do to hint ? Why, lie called -him a Miscreant in his pamphlet. When he came from America he cent a challenge, and because he did not choose to go out t;e . sent : -, lti.nt , the two priniplitets - :.' He took no tintietrielf •tbe challenge., And on the .2811, of Dec: be sent!hint..anOttote.7.. Mr. eobbett was several tirnes interrupted liy,tits c'-ntss , .b at-tee, and desired nut 'to-in -pike- any , statenterits •whith•lie did not mean to support by evidermet—t,Vtar.a.-Vettyloni.f w hi c h h e c o ntended. that- tite plaintiff was the us;... greiSor, ,and not, entitled to, our . farthing dantages,.he.coo eluded wit bout calling:Any with esse t s...e • ~,. • , • , After a most impartial and, able -change.from the CHI v.F uswlcE,.the &try retired, .from_ the box one hour and..avha.if. theirsetnru they pronounced a verdict -fur the _plaisktiff -DKmages 408.. , . - . • - . • COURT' OF EXCHFQUE,II,PEc. S. i'HE KING V. Stn. J. ILILL,II.T.. and sIR J. El NI sz.F.it row LL B BT. w !. The . ll7tottsxr-GrNrciAl. stated-the ca 4 for the:PiCw.ll: Fie said this ..vas informatiba brotlEttat tic re"covi'r • the-'pe nalty of three bonds, amounting. to 100,t)t}';„ . eoct, entered into by the defendants; Uortilitidned for the taitlsfiil pert:firm a-nee of duties, by 'Mr. Eyton, Iteceiver.General of 'l4 , xes, for Shropsbire, closing the 'years , . 1813, 1814; 'and 'lGl5. fie'statc4 that 'Mr. - Eyton . .(fied in IKe year 1816,, ' aCwilich. time, he 'Was - in debt to - • the - Crown in a saiii , of ..bout 10(1,0001. on at cunt 'of thettiree yea's for whirls 'the tlefeb 'chats had given th e . binids in' eric•tioi, a his defence which 'wottid tleatifered, ke. Atto'rney-Octir:;o he understood was that INlr..l:`,.yton, who had hero General for many years before' 1811, was in a! era-,, :o - t he Crown in alarge su'a), at the • time the pro , ;ttit Prtetitliants gave the po nds on Which they are ribtv surd; acid lb it ailriri~ the years I rit3, 14, and 15,1iir paid into the. Exebilpri - the. amount of tiixes be receiv.edbut, said the Attorney-General, a great part of his payments, during ,those ygais, , we'ro:ufa4e in 4itigfiictiour of fortio.r ttaLioces,.whieti The iiriii.el,ot%ems wilt prime, and then the 'M , ot , questiiin I the .N 1 iel .be, whether Mr. Eyton had filftiffi. , it tfte tiqulitions. of ti.Z. bz>ar,l. Sin jeanfs PALI MILFril D rfilE - the deft: o,liinG the Co'iwt, that t i ne questinivw;ls riot vs lsethe atiy.ot t'..6 eon ditions of the hood haiiircvn at all,,itif: gist!. the Court would not sar - , that if there b, ii tieen a failo4,llo.tne NatO;itlfor ,a tirthing; tlritt tlierfore the p:llielties tuna writ; 'forfeited: - "' • ^, • It was admitted by the ATTonsEli-(J2NErth, fhAt Mr:T,:ytots had received taxes in the ve.ata st , t3, and 18, to the aniiulit. 6163 .q3 40a1. paid 'into . the . Exche7 burr, inj %count of the same year5,...511,w . . , 01.; 144aving . Itefi eireilqi of 1 7,4551. 1C5.:14d.; out a'wlticli the flttiroity,Ciitut rat.se.itt t fro - re. wizr , Ml* bee - ihtl:efed , iso t he emits .01 a tbvnt 01 : , is: . !! c:i! . Serjeaht PELL stikitoitted that it shrub! be teff to thf , Jury firm whether the ir,inicy that had 'fien by f ig _t)it yearl tt 13, 14,,istui 13, WAS SAIIIC Ile had rtiNCiied: • ' ---• ctitEb;.l.l 4 .turiN paid, it vvi cei , lei , ce.ihal.oc(J`4l.)Pibe everived for those. .11:1d urea ,sehirch wv.k proof t ho• he' had I,t4oliii`tion . I.l.e4tr`ti).Vite3e , :wr - Pe:ljahle freriltbe. v iserle , ,fit& 0131'or , tx.ilt• t V i;: o;w;rlvinnicl, havt. ittinppot!iltility tin a n:ot ion rot a 6 - eat' ial, and h., lasirt sin cerely wished them success, as he had the , ),:ea, 4 l,irt. trrb'ernie 4c 4 t tk4' the pefr.tul 4n land lip cwt.. ey honourable La) as anyin,Vntgind, ktn.t.aLipreletit.,lii's Lord- 7 strip *rtill• he, co nitt - not see arl occasion fu trOblile the :41, e.t in w i m me t ti a roy, ; (6 1 , 11 1,9 a Verdict for I& Crotilr,"the full penalty of the bonds 0,00,0001. ; • • I . ' i•C b re 4. ino rO , l tie. FA , r`" • , • roO' l all, oe" ( ' fOP rOce Glr J ~ " o t Gre %.4 7 . A . . su o i•ileral