The Sun. — London, England, 1820-09-08 00:00:00

had . o the) jour - C the t in' . , . , •:. ~: s ~ , '-',„ 7 , .1 , - - 1 -- 1.,0 ',„ --------. _ ___ ----- • 43) 4 '. 4 .ca----- -- . - I - 7 3- 2-: - 4. •- ` 7 --', ~..„., ~..,„, _.,,,0. 1...4 , - -- - - . ----- - -- , A ' ` - a - - '.,•,,.., ).1. _s ',. ....... .41 0 "4. ~ _ • : 4\ 4 t 4 t l' • " • M f t not usioa, scuS- . Lora neY 4 Lt the only It he suffi, prO" [I the )t bJ wai ►le to qtlo' e.n C.Up• T. re! s aw ~ritieci s wtly i3OOl ,~ e :1c~' , i 1 t t° cot“d , they Ild be would .as• LS tyre rw your' 3 at x se cir- )~S-t :X' C;oC ' platect s upper, incite; ods, rtEsc4 telv At ISlrtt t, Jilt be' tell sh°,. tiler 0 1 a nd in tchallf c, 1,1 Ii thei r !din4sl .11a:1 ire w 3 ecei: ve in' rhorn° s itil the o f oat' Fran Ci4 DT 130 as -- f ind Co' cari' ) T (.10" able br l o st 10, lc, E0, 01 , t 1 . 6 IlYs' nc e. , ; f c , ;ICt ,29, ‘t • • 1)1 .1' NUMBER 8749.1 i)4 OFFICE OF ORDNANCE, dug - . 25, 1820. THE PRINCIPAL OFFICERS (d His 31 4JESTY'S ORDNANCE do hereby give I.V otree that Proposals will be received at their ()fee in Pall-Mall, or -efore Friday, the 15th day of September next, front 1.,-4ch P ersons as may be willing to undertake the Supply of °RAGE for the Ordnance Horses stationed at Woolwich, 1 1 7 4 ""xs North Britain, and Northern Distzlict, to be de ;ere"' at the Expence of Mo Contractor, for a period of `Months from the Ist of October next. ' ri te wzi tt Oats to be good, sweet, dry, and clean, withz!tt any (9' . Foxy or Mnwbyrnt Oats, and most not weigh less a nd Pounds per Winchester Bushel; the Hart 'to be see et St r , 4 r.V, and delivered in Trusses. of 561 ks. weight.; the z1,11; w l a be good, clean, and dry - heat or Rye Straw, and 2 7 ere d Tr ri ses of 36tbs. weight. Prices to be for the respective Quantities of each ' 1 `le which marl he delivered, to be at the following rates, l'or the Oats at per 1001133. Avoirdupois Weight, h r the Hay at per hundred and twelve pounds, 4 4 r th e St rat a at - per hundred and twelve pounds. St a rd it is expeetrd that Contractor -shall receive the 0, 15 ‘e Dung-, which, during the period y' his Contract, nrry V 55 qtatc, makinir an allowance for the same after the ratr jo • per H orse p er Week. tortizer particulars may he known upon application to triPlicers conum. :n il/ 7 , 4 r the Royal „dallier!, in each Dis *rm' and also a t th e Secretary's' (Vice in Pall-Mall, • CI any day heiween the hours eV' Ten and Four whe e the . Propowds must be delivered, sealed up and " Proposals for Forage ;" but no Proposals can ht Nc, oit t qniter the sa id I 5/A 'September, at Twelve o'Clock at k#l,, I .f the VI ( jay ; neither any Trader be. noticed c tica:i . (4l l'actliskairing it, dr:fa:lgen/ in his behalf, shall Bo Order of the Board, R. H. GREIF, Secretary. iNr ir St s " 'AWLS, &e. AND CURIOUS ARTICLES FROM PEKIN AND CANTON. '4E arriving from IDEA, and having • 'ure suAivt,s than they wish to retain, are res , pect- Thenvinfi,rnied they may exchange them for the finest speci- I 'll; ) !Miti•li Caaemere and other Shawls, the newest fa• IfisCqle Articles tor Morning and Erening Dress ; choice lell6 Lin enS, :1111,1 French Cambrics of the Cambray and t Ira hOnics; Foreign • and Brhish 'fable Linens, 11.us -I,4oii` ''ther Sheetings, &c. ; India Mitslins, with those for .rnms' Crarats Long Cloths, Imperial Cloth . , White 1 :s 1- ) ' a nd Anjeng:ies, the Various kinds of BritisliMits `4,;,;,''''gaut Wrought Dresses and Drapirries, new pencilled l ilt 117 feinted (amhries and Bettillas, peculiar to ; tiew and economical Drawing and Dining Room h~s, Mererns Dimities, &c. by applyim: at 1‘14 4 1)'; lOLEsA ' LE and RETAIL EAST-INDIA and .tll)‘,,:•'C . ;N aad BRITISH WAREHOUSE, No. lii, CHEAP -1 • • • An ( l • erciapts haring Commissions front abroad, respe c t fitity inforovrd they can select the first de• of Family Linens, &c. at fixed "prices; and those talito iii . the entire piece, or deiuy, at the who.!esale 41,,, priet ors Of business supplied. A : 1 11 oNTIF:E6 by her MAJESTY, their "ql•;it iti ,, hoesses . the Duchess of York, and Duke 'of imperial Majesty the EMperor of • Rus s i a, by antlplritv, and by most of the Nobility and ' rdir.pe. ' LAN's MACASSAR OIL, the w Original and Oe: an:toted to afford the greatest nouris h went to the kin . , 33 ,,,Miir—pre-anits its being injured by change of ch '4o .&c.—removes the scurf, harshness (", Prevents ttia • hair falling off or turning grey, olees Ittidi growth on bald places, make s the hair Prod. ; gl o s iv , pr e serves tfic coil in damp weather, 4 • 3 (1 and evebrows—Price 611.--:s.—lOs. 6d. • / 1 , , ,,,,„ 4"5 i t '11•1ca pee bottle. 1115 ' t_T I ,•LAND'i .EsSENCE of Tai RE.—By merely we t, " • • n the Proprietors warrant Pr Otice • • PuP " •it or Grey pirnt a i mmediately a perfect change tielln'sl,ers, Eve-brows, &c. to a beautiful glossy and ( i n,t Brown or Black, imitating the exact na . luia 4 41 111 r, W ai'lling• makes this Dye more dur..ble. Ladies or may Clve their Flair with ease and secrecy. Price , eld • . - -a nd f,;(1. er oini,V l olesal e , reta i l, an d for e x portat i on, thtLs . ole i ° ," , A. ROWLAND an d SON, corne r o f Kui a l te ' first turnip, on the right, in Hatton-gstrden . , 7 41 London ; and, by appointment, by all Perfume r s it,','titte Venders throughout Europe, and SON respectfully eantio . n . the s P t u ir b , l , ic ! • it,kti thw:e who are travelling Fraree, against p !us to .. t)o., • N'4e L composed of dcleteriou . s . ingred i ie r nts ß it a r n io d 9s s R o . rat prevent the . imposition, ask for ov. -‘v ‘ ani rs Dy e, and obServe that each genuine bottle 4 41 - 1 . on • r e d •„k '' A, ROWLAND o N „ the outside labe l , in - without that stgnatore arc counterfeits. L ONDON JOURNALS. [D,4 11, EX T IMC TS at Fft n , '' THE MORNING PAPERS. Qst , , [Morning Chronicle.] tas,, 'Nay the Attorney-General closed the Th e , f°r the Prosecution against her Majesty. tfe Dr "Pected discussiOn.on his application of Are in consequence of th '"llg day did not take place, The 110„ t h a t aPPlicatiOn having been withdrawn. 4s e „, tllll l there apprized by the Learned Gentle stch he had that morning received dis ttle 't s r°4l ' Italy . , from which it appeared that t il i , Ltn "ses could not arrive in town within the . Loid he had stated. The question which their 111 w - h s ic r have first to determine, is the manner to tld 1 the defence for her. Majesty, shall be l 'llv tlet ed• Mr. Brougham demanded to be al- i l s w " , t° °Pen his case, and to have an option to ea 4 111 . 4 4'nes ses either now or at a future period ; as I lky, 1 . see occasion. When the Lords meet this 04 :Lil e 0 , ‘-'clunsel for her Majesty are to be called to . i, s 'aut to state the course they wish the House ~ -11, : ,,,,. -04 si , ~, when the subject' is to be taken into tllat "eration.—Th, Earl of Liverpool observed , Nd' i r her Majesty's Counsel demanded to pro „II', elniediaieiv with their defence., without call `4'oe,l' anY adjournment in the midst of the evi tltt::''''''' if they demanded an adjournment before 4s . i ill g on th e defence the House could in either Nr ' 11 4 " 11 0 diffi cu l ty i n acceding to their request. :4i,11: ofetandee.Brs iii will not fail to remark the impor krt °"s(!rvations on the subject of the Divorce l to which a question of the Ear %,tat.t7)(it'sdale ove rise. The' Earl of Liverpool 11 (ii i , ,' if there was a strong feeling in that )It t i' ti '' °l' in tho Country, from religious or other I ve tic): l4ti ulis, against the Divorce, he had no ob , 4s l tO abandon that part of the measure; and ' 4 )l. tir ed the House that personal relief did ~.: "tier • hit° the wishes 7 1 / 4 1. 41, vt , d ") sorne daysago, of his Majesty. We that a majority of the , FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1820. Bishops had determined against the Divorce, and that Ministers were satisfied they could not carry it ; the result has proved that our informa tion was correct. Warning Herald.] The proceedings on the Bill of Pains and Pe ualties made a rapid . stride: yester4ay. The abandoned his application bf the preceding day,• for a few days' delay, in order to give time for the arrival of some witnesses who had been frightened away from the shores of England by the tumult at Doter, upon the first arrival of foreign witnesses. The Learned Gen tleman stated, that letters froin Milan had in duced him" to withdraw his application. Theo dore Majocci was then called in, cross-examined by Mr: Brougham, re-examined by the Attor ney-General, and dismissed from the Bar. Some• observations were then made by • several Peers upon the alleged threat of Col. Brown, at Milan, of having the Alie❑ Bill . enforced against young llarietti in London. The topic was intro duced by Lord Lansdowne; for the purpose of obtaining a distinct explanation. Lord Liver pool stated that up to his seeing .the letter of the elder Marietti, he was ignorant of the fact that such a person was iu London ; that there was not the remotest contemplation of applying the Alien Act to him, that upon the first intiMation of this Matter Colonel Brown had been written to, and that his answer should be communicated. The Noble Marquis and Lord Holland expressed themselves perfectly satisfies with the Noble Earl's explanation. [Morning Post.] The case for the prosecution against the Queen was yesterday closed, the Attorney-General hav ing withdrawn his request: for more time to ad duce further evidence, in consequence of a letter received by him in the morning from Milan, by which he found that it would require a much longer time tobring forward the new witnesses than he had anticipated on the preceding day.— Theod6re Majocci was again called in and cross examined by Mr. Brougham; after which he was re-examined by the Attorney-General. Neither of these examinations, however, was productive of any material new discovery. Mr. Brougham having then distinctly stated that he did not mean to have recourse to any further cross-exa mination at any time, the Solicitor:General pro ceeded to sum up the evidence, which task he performed with equal candour and ability. We have given a full and faithful.report of his excel lent Speech, to which we beg leave to refer our Readers, not having space at present to enter into any recapitulation of it. Mr. Brougham is expected to commence the defence for her Ma jesty this day.—We find, by a reply to a ques tion put by the Earl of Lonsdale, that the course which we early stated to have been judged most proper to pursue, will ultimately be adopted. The Earl of Liverpool stated, that his Majesty had not the least wish that the present measure should operate in the way of relief to himself personally, his only object being that justice should be done, and the honour of the country upheld. If, therefore, the Bill proceeded to a Committee, and it should be found that a strong feeling existed, founded on religious or other impressions (the Bishops are understood to have some religious scruples with respect to the disso lution of the marriage), he should not press the Divorce Clause upon their Lordships. In this case, the Bill will be one of Degradation, Pains and Penalties, but not of Divorce—an alteration which, as we have already observed,. is -little more than a return to the original intention of the framers of the measure. [New Times.] The case in support of the Bill of Pains and Penalties has at I(ngth been closed. The Attor ney-General finding that the remaining witnesses could not be expeCted in a short time, very pro perly resolved not to prolong the state of anxiety in which all parties must be placed by delay, and accordingly. the Solicitor-General, in a cur sory manner, summed up the evidence, contend ing that it ormed a case still stronger than the opening statement of his Learned Leader. It was most fairly and honourably admitted..,by Lord Liverpool, that whatever might he .the impres sion on the minds of individual Peers, no one ought at the present moment to form a conclusive opinion on the guilt or innocence of her Majesty. When the defence is closed that decision must be made, and should it unfortunately lead to the adop tion of the Bill, then will be the time to consider the proper extent of the penalties. For our own part, we have uo hesitation to declare at once, that if the preamble be deemed to be fully borne out in evidence, the penal clauses will appear to us to be necessary, however painful, con sequences of the offence. If a Queen Consort of these realms be proved to have been guilty of long habitual adulterous intercourse with a me nial, we cannot see how the national morals are to be preserved from the grossest contamination, but by solemnly degrading her \ from her rank and dignities ; and that degradation could not be rendered complete without a Divorce. If the bond of marriage were not dissolved, she would remain the Consort of the King, and consequent ly would be, in spite of any other form of degra dation, still Queen Consort. In this opinion Earl Grey seems to coincide. Either her Majesty is innocent, and then she is not to be degraded at all, or she is guilty, and then she must be di vorced in order to her being effectually degraded. PAM, IA M F NT, HOUSE OF LORDS, THURSDAY, SEPT. 7. THE QUEEN. [Continuation of the. Proceednigs of yesterday.] The following is the conclusion of the . Cross- Examination of MIJOCCI. C.Z. Perhaps M►. Powell never spoke to you at all about the buiiness of the Queen Some Noble Lord objected to this question being put, grounding his objection, as we understood, on the character of •Mr. Powell relative to the proceeding. Mr. BROUGHAM said be Was sure that it was not ex pected he should answer that objection. Any thing that Mi. Powell said was as much evidence as the conversation of any other person. The LORD CHANCELLOR thought the Counsel had a right to ask, did Powell say so and so, with a view to call a witness to contradict the statement or answer of the present • Witness.. • Mr. - BROUGHANI—Your Lordship observes I - ask about an occurrence in which_ a third person is ilresent. Q. Do you mean to represent that you never had any conversation with Mr. Powell about the business of the Queen I—A. How—what do you mean I don't understand what you say. The question was directed to be repeated, and the Inter preter suggested that be might be allowed to change the word " conversation" in the question to " spoken." Has Mr. Powell never spoken to you about the business of the Queen ?—Mr. Powell spoke to me at Milan when I made my deposition, 'but after that he Doer spoke tome on the subject. Did you ever see this letter before (showing the witness a letter) ?—Never. Do you know a person of the name of Long did not. Were you ever at the Globe Tavern ; the place, I mean, where you used to dine with Gavacci ?-1 know nothing of the name of the tavern. Do you know the name of the master of that tavern I should see him I should know him. . IN; , ,w while he is coming, I'll just put another question. Did you ever see Mr. Powell and his clerk ?—Yes. . . e Frquently ?—I have seen them sometimes. How long were yon ever with him, or them, at any one of those times ?—I have seen him, and merely paid my respects to him. Now look round, and see if that is the master of the Globe Tavern—(t'h'e witness's attention was here directed to a per son named Joseph James Long) ?—Yes. Did you employ that person to write a letter for you to Mrs. Blackwell, you not being able to write ?—He has written twice for me; once to Mr.' Hyatt, and once to Mrs. Blackwell. ✓ Should you know either of CmSo letters if I were to show them to you gut hi o to write them, and he said, here are the letters, but 1 never took them, and should not know them. Alr. BROUGHAM begged to apprise their Lordships, that he now meant to ask tic witness it he did not give such and such instructions, and state certain things, nut asking as to the contents of the letter. The LORD CHANCELLOR thought that the Counsel might ask a witness if hr did, not desire A. B. to write so and so. Did you not desire Mr. Long to write a letter to Mrs. Blackwell to the following_effect ?—I begged him to . write a letter. Did you desire him to write in thii manner have safely delivered the letter to your brother, and he was quite welt, and desires to be remembered to you kindly ?"-1 told hint to %lite that I had not given her letter to her brother, but had left it with his wile, and to give compliments to the rest of the family. Did you not 'give instructions to Mr. Long-to add, that you had got a situation, - and was going to Vienna that evening ? Yes; I told him I was setting oat for Vienna. Did you not desire to be lemembered to Few, Madame Catalani, Madame and Mrs. Hughes's brother, mean ing !Ors. Hughes's sun, whom you were accustomed to call brother ?—As au act pf friendship. Do you mean that you used to call Mrs. Hughes's son " brother," as an act 'of friendship ?-Yes. - Did you desire Long to write " After I left you all, I could not eat, nor drink, nor sleep ; so God bleps you all ? —lt was jokingly that 1 wrote so. Did you never propose to marry Mrs. Blackwell, or any other person- in the service of her Royal Highness ?—(ln a very loud and rather angry tone)—l wanted to marry Mrs. Blackwell, and all the women in the house.—(Laughter from all parts of the House.) Were you never at Paris in 1818 or 1819 ?,—No. Were you never there at all in 1819?—Never. Re-examined by the ATTORNEY-GENERAL. *R. You .have been asked concerning some Napoleons which you received to go to Vienna; I wish to know in what capa city you went thither?—A. As a courier. Did you. receive any..older to proceed to Vienna with all possible dispatch ?—Yes, I was 'ordered to go as quickly as possible. For what purpose were those Napoleons given to you pre vious to your setting off' for Vienna ?—For my expenses on this journey. Were you to account for them ?—Yes. Did you after Wards account for them ?—Yes; I gave an account of my expenses at Vienna. You have been asked whether you took a note for Mr. Powell to a certain great house. I wish to know for what pur- Pose'you were 'to take that letter thither ?—As far as I remem ber it was to obtain a passport. On that occasion, what part of the house did you go to ? I went in at the Swiss's lodge, at the outer gate; then across the court, and up the steps; there I rang the hell, and the -door was opened, and I went in; and afterwards I returned the same way out. Bow long was the time between your going in and coming out ?—About half au hour, nut more. When you lett the great house, did they send you to any other place to get your passport ?—Yes. • Where ?—To the Minister of the—the—Austrian Ambas sador. Add they slid an ytonthere gave get your t i p . a s s4p o o r r t. t 1-1 showed them the letter, Whom did you see at the great house ?—I saw a footman, and a German, a sort of ecuyer. IVltotti else did y o u see at the great house ?—I saw a big n on, rather handsome,' who could speak neither French nor Italian, and therefore we spoke by signs. - Fur what purpose did you go to the great house The first time I was to carry a packet, and then 1 was sent to it. Did you bring that packet over with you when you came to England ?—Yes. , t ell isle, as well as you can remember, how many times al-, together you went to the great house?—As well as I realm u,r, I was there three times. Yon have told us what you went for the first time, now t e ll u s, if you recollect, what you went fur the other two times? The second time I went to see if there was any answer to the packet, for which I had the receipt And the third time ?—liecause, as ther2 was no an swer, they told use to call again. Then was it the third time, or another time, that you went for the passport ?—lt was another By the Earl' of ItOSEBEItitY.—How many persons were in company with you on your journey to Vienna was alone. ' Then how could you give an account- of your expences, since I Understand you to have said you cannot write?—lt was not a written account ; but I told them what the expences were ? BY Earl GREY.—Then are we to understand, therefore, that. you can neither read nor write ?—I can only write my name, and hardly that—very badly. And is that all you cats write ?—Yes ; I newer could write letters nor accounts. The• Noble Earl I hen referred to the minutes of this wit ness's cross-examination, the second day, from which the fol lowing questions and answers were read : How lung were youiti England whets you were in Mr. Ilyatt's service?--I do not remember, because I have not the book in which 1 made the memorandum. [PRICE SEVENPENCE. How long ♦were you in the service of Mr. Hyatt?-1 hart net the book in which 1 nnirked the time. These questions and answt rs bring read aver by the Inter:. preter,in Italian, to the witdess, with a view tVciaestioning . him as to the possibility of his !seeping such a mealorandaar book, not being able to write, the witness said his expretsion on that occasion was not " ho marcato,"l have made the nae . ; morandum, hut " di marcare, to snake a memorandum." The Interpreters disagreeing, however, in their understanding'of the witness's meaning, he was asked By Earl GREY—Whether he meant to say, that he had not the book in which he put this down, or that he had no book in which to put itdown? Upon the witness giving his answer— The Interpreter, Marchese Spitietto, exclaimed, with a most animated expression of astonishment, " God bless me, I am quite out here ; he says he bad no book at all of any . sort-! "—(Loud Laughter.) The Marquess of LANSIJOWN, in a very low tone, made some observations on the, witness's so often repeated phrase of " Non mi ricordo." The Interpreter said that he had already observed to thtir Lordships that. it had many meanings.—(Order.) The Earl of LAUDERDALE then proposed that the witness should explain in other Italian words what he meant by "Non mi ricordo." Lord HOLLAND observed, that as those Italian words bore a great variety of meanings, it would not serve any pur pose to ask the witness what he meant, as they went tbiongtai the whole of the examinations, and asked hint to explain in every part where be had made use of those words, they could not tell where he bad intended one meaning, and where any other. The Earl of LAUDERDALE still thought an explanation should be asked.—(Cries of " Withdraw, viithdraw.") The witness then withdrew. COLONEL BROWNE. The Marquis of LANSDOWN then rose to call the 'attention "of their Lordships to a Letter which appeared this morning in one of the Pa pers, from Mr. Marietti to his son, in which he stated,, that Colonel Browne had threatened to enforce the Alien Act against him. He should not trouble their Lordships with reading this Letter. It had been published in all the Jour nals in this town, and would probably be pub lished in all the Journals in Europe.. The ob.: ject of his rising was,•to ask the Noble Lord op-; posite, whether this act was done under the: sanction of his Majesty's Government, and whe, ther this Colonel Browne was an accredited. agent. This, it was of the utmost importance to know, because, if this act was done without the sanction of the' Government, Colonel Browne, had committed an act of great state delinquency. - And it became incumbent on his Majesty's nisters to disavow- the transaction.. Lord LivErtrooL said that he could - not ob ject to give the best answer in his power to the question, of the Noble Marquis, and thanked him for giving him the opportunity of so doing. He said he knew that there was a Mr. Ma, rietti at Milan, but did not know there was such a person in England, therefore it never could have entered into the minds of his Majesty's Ministers to take any measures against him un, der the Alien Act. lle said that he was sure that nothing could be alleged against his Ma jesty's Government at home. With respect to what . had happened at Milan it was impossible for him to know. He had no difficulty in saying that Colonel Browne .was a qualified and accre dited agent of the Government, and proceed ings of this kind could not be conducted without such agents. He said the letter in fact did not appear to him as if it had been written by a per son who had been spoken to by any one con cerned for Government. The Noble Lord (Li, verpool) then said that he had no difficulty is stating, that-on the very day which the Learned Counsel desired the letter to be put into- his hands, he immediately desired a letter to b 4, written to Colonel-Browne; desiring him to give a full explanation of He said it was directly in the. teeth of .any instructions which his Ma jesty's Government had given. After ft few•words from the Marquis of Lars-' down and Lord Holland, Mr. Brougham unzqui-: vocally said, in an answer to a question by the Attorney-General, that,* was not his intention to have recour - se to any fUrther cross-examination; RECAPITOLATION OF EVIDENCE. . The SOLICITOR-GENERAL then rose at half past twelve -o'clock . to sum up the evidence to the House. He commenced by stating, that his Friend (Mr. Brougham) having closed the long : and elaborate cross-examination s of Theodore Majocci, : and as the whole of the-evi dence in support of the Bill waS now before their Lordships, the duty devolved upon him of, summing up to their Lordships the, leading' points of that evidence,- in aripifirt: of the alle gations contained in the preambleaithe Bill of Pains and Penalties against her %lefty the' Queen.. He. trusted, however, that before,.he entered upon- this summing up, their . Lord Ships would 'allow him a few Moments to justify him self and- his Learoed. Vriend.s who• acted with him, as to the c,ourse intrOued and the principles by which they were:a.v.titS,cil in con ducting thiS 'most painful and .airtkw.s,ihqniry.. The moment the Attorney-General hadicOyedt, his instructions to support this Bill, he; togethmi with his Learned Friends who were appointeiho assist him, directed their most minute and anxiaii*4 attention. to collect all the evidence that it would be their duty to adduce before theirtord ships upon ;such an occasion. They lost not a., Moment in weighing well, and considering all the materials,' and everY other,evidecce. which could: bear upon this great gtiestion. • -They collected' together and digested 'every thing which they thought material to this paramount • inquiry,. without 'regard to either- the influence, or the impression which' z any parts of that •evidence were calculated to create when it came be-• fore their Lordships. In so 'doing they felt. 'that they were performing their duty fully, fairly, and candidly to their Lordships. Now that the evidence had been gone through, they trusted their Lordships thought they had fully discharged the duty imposed upon