The Sun. — London, England, 1815-07-05 00:00:00

IMPERIAL., PARLIAMENT. HOUSE 'OV LORDS, Tummy, JUL] 4. 7r ;li ense of Davison V. Rohertson,•judgmcnt of the Cot In the ease of Holdseroftv. Kellett, jtidg tire Tte RoyAl Assent Was given by Commission to the Tohacto the Train Oil Bill; the Forces Herring Abroad Pay Biil, 'the Payira ter-General's Accounts Bill, the Spirit's' Trii4e BM between Eng Nod and Ireland, the Chelsea Ho, the Kilinainham Pensioners Bill, the Dander Ha'r bone Bill, the Transportation Biii, the Loadoti New Prison Act Ans - eocliiielit Bill, and several private Bills, Commis- Sio Lords Eldon, RedcSdale, and Shaftslinry. Tbs ., Local Militia Pav and Clothing Bill, the'AgentGenetal 'of Forces Bill, tfrilris.li MiLiiia Clothing Bill, the Prize aiiA• others, IN'ai brought up from the Com Mons, and "read a first lime. Toe ti e ititttun';ansionlrolse Bill, the London and Holy 'head- itoad lkll, the DiAillere Bill, the Foreign Postage Li''.. alai Sroten As sesse d T axes Bill , were read aod time. !The twti Exeoequer Bills Bills, the Vir'uol Bill, and others, FJer culowitted. VACCINATION BILL.. - Earl ST_ANEIOPE ;are notice Oat he would to-morrow, or Thorsdai, move the Ru rmitling of the Vaccination Bill, fur Ihe ,-,n pose of raising. the question upon it. The Bill, how etcr, as it came fr,,m was: a most absurd inn- Vi re - . "I here were three specie, of vaccine matter, that whih arliWeted the purpo,e well, that which did not answer the purp,)se well, aud that. whigh had no effect at all, arid the ef fect of the BM would be to-fiirouote the use of that which did t'othin;;. Ti:tf.ttip;liold Estates Bill wits contmitte& Repurt - CHANCERY PRACTICE. Earl STANHOPE adverted to the eirctsmstente of his having sometime ag, - pre.'sent ed - a petition from a person who Lad beeo impvisoned fur three years for debt, and Who corn plaioed of loot having been allowed the privilege of being iirought up from prisou,tp plead his own cause in the c as e of his own bankruptcy:" The l'4oble anti Learned Lord who presided in that Court had sent the petitioner a very civil letter, stating his doubt whether he had power to bring him tip; and in consequence of , that doubt, he (Lord Stanhope) had given notice of his intention to bring in a Bill to remove all doubt- vu the subject. But now he understood-that the doubt had bee.' alt eady removed, and that the Court had power•to order up a prisoner under such circumstances. It was therefore unnecessary to bring in a Bill on the subject. A doubt had libewisu been expressed, svhtther the ,person in tp,vst ion could be h e a r d a ft er b e i ng b roug h t up, because he I,as in contempt: - He admitted . that it it were clear that he was in contempt, he could not be heard but the very ques tion was,- whether he was in contempt or nut, which must de 'rend on the validity of the bankropte,y. In such a case, .he Nt , as clear that he might be heard; and such, he understood, - was the opinion of the Noble and Learned Lord on the wool sack. IRISH DISTILLERIES. .The Irish Distillery Untie.: Bill was committed. The Earl of 'DONO fI r f:IIMORE made smne observations *Cm it, objecting chiefly to rendering the stock in band lia ble to the duty. The Elrl of LIVERPOOL defended - the principle on the ground that as the distiller would immediately raise his prices in proportion to the duty, the advantage of neglecting to in clude the stock in hand would be an unreasonable benefit to the-individual at the exprase,of the public. • . The Bill then passed the Committee. Report to-morrow. PE'fII'IONS, The Marquis of LANSDOWNE stated, that he had in his baud two petitions, the one from certain Solicitors in the comity . of !toss of Roscommon, and another from the Soli citors of Waterford, praying an exemptiba from certain Stoup Duties. The petitions were against taxes in progress ) but he repeated his former observations, that the principle on which such petitions, were not received under such circumstances by the Commons, did nut apply to their Lordships' House. As the subject, however, was to he discussed at - another time, he Should not press the petitions now. Earl GREY pre,,ented a Petition from a person of the name of Mattisou, the object of 'which, be presumed, was to have Soioe compe s.ition for the inention of a lite preserver or Cork'j.ickei.—Laid on the table. 'f'ri,• 'cart of LAUDERDALE gave notice, that he would to-morrow, move the second reading of the Partner'ship Stock Salo Bill.—Adjourned. IIOUSE OF . COMMONS. QUARME, the Deputy Usher of the Black Rod, ap tenred at Bar, and summoned the' HOuse to appear in the House of Lords to hear the Royal Assent given by prounis *ion to several puoiic and private Bills. The SI'EA.KER, on his return, acquainted The House that he had neva toe House of Peers, and heard the Royal As•etm given by Commission to several public and private Bills, (i'or which see toe proceedings in the Lords.) . The Charitable Donation Bill was read a second time, and went through a Committee: the report to-morrow, The Royal Canal dill Ireland), the Epsom. Salts Bill, and the Funded Debt Bill, were Itveraily read a third titue,.and passed, • ORANGE SOCIETIES IN IRELAND. Sir H. PARNELL rose to-- make the motion of .which he had given notice last week, when he presehted a Petition from the !lonian Catholics near Newry, praying that the nature of these Orange Societies ought be enquired into. He stated, that the Orange Societies in the North of Ireland wet e very numerous in eight of the largest counties in that part of the United Empire ; that five of them form a district, and that they met in these diStricts for the purpose of keeping tip:ani mosities only among neighbours : descilibed 'the nature of the oath they took, which he said was secret, and therefore illegal, and, in fact, ,that they interfered with the ,lye administration 9f justice, for they frequently acted both as constables and jurymen, in the former of which characters they persecuted the Roman Catholics, and in the latter capacity of jurymen, wherever a cause was • depending between an Orangeman-and a Roman Ca •tholic, it .was impossible for the Catholic, to ob lain an impartial verdict. The Petition also 'Com plained, that many of the Magistrates leaned more •to one side than the - other. That very able and •upright Judge, Judge Fletcher, had given it as Isis opin on to the Grand Jury of the County of Wexford, that these Orange associations were il legal, anal that, unless they were put down, the peace of the North of Ireland mast be continually disturbed and interrupted.. He instanced a great many rases in which bloodshed, anti sometimes murder, had been the consequence of th'e feuds and animosities they led to, andirepresented their far ther continuance to be a most grievous injury to the lieoet, happiness, and welfare-of the commu nity at large. Fie concluded by moving— Address to his Itt,yal Highness the Prince Regent, re questoLc that he would be graciously pleased to appoint a co.nomisuon to inquire into time proceedings of the Orange _Associations in the Ilbritl of Ireland:" Mr. i!EFLF..said .the honourable Baronet had for the lasi three 9r tour years made it an annual custom to hring forward a motion of this nature . fust at the close of the Session whether it was that he Was desirous to make a speech on the sutjcct, and to gain popularity in that pa r t o f th e CO ull fry, he - could not say. He nnist, however, ohj,:ct to the motion of the Hon. Baronet, b e - Cause no good t'fhcct could arise 1114111 it, h ut t o rev i ve u „, se tends and animosities which some '.y,a is a go acre carried to a very lamentable Iteight, hut whicii for some time p&st ,hat! been „ I , ( l . ,whicii, waS hoped, granti4llv sulTittrig, 'Nvonld in tiaie Linirely die atvay. The commis- Sion could only be for the purpose of making in quiry %%nether these ()tangy socicties were legal, a" Wiled: Cr Judge Fletcher's opinions Were reel'. It the Hun. B.tronet - meant to chaige the Governineut with parti4ty in the admints tration of the laws, Ife (inert "to hare troktglit .forwai.dhis charge in an open and manly manner in such a 'period of the Session when it might have had a tair and fall discussion, and not [rave confined himself to such look and general allega tions as were contained in the petition from which he made his statement. lie thought there was no -parliamentary kriiiind laid for an address to pro duce an inquiry, which Ea must repeat could do no possible good, but might on the contrary be the means - of mischief and injury, by blowing into a flame embers that I.tere nearly quenehed, and as such, he moved the previous question. Mr. MAU RICE FITZCIER AIM differed entirely in opinion with the Right lion. Gentleman, arid thought the motion of high_importance, and that it might to he granted. Mr. V. FITZGERALD concnrred in opinion with his Right Hon. F r i e nd (Nr. Peek) that no'Par-, liamentary ground had ken-laid for inquiry, and in,oppo,ing the motion - be did it from a certainty that it agreed to it could have no utility or good effect. General ARCHER 'said he was clearly of opinion that the Orangenien had been the saviours of Ireland, and he holed the motion would not be agreed to. Sir 11. PARNELL shortly replied. Sir G. HILL deprecated the idea of going into any topic which revived the recollection of these terrible associations. The who in th e North of Ireland were those had the greatest reason to complain, and the Itibband men had been gtHt y of scenes of bloodshed and murder, from which these associations alone saved. the Country. On a division, the numbers were - For the Motion :Against it .... Majority n,.;ainst the Motion ..... Mr. GuEN FE LL his int CllOOO to sub mit a motion respecting the Bank early next Ses sion, 90 The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER brought up stindry Pa pers, anrong them was the Bull of Pope Pius I'll: for the restoration of the Jesuits. Ordered to lie on the table. Some Papers were also brought up relative to Canada, and to the East India Company. - Mr. BARING, wished to know if the Chancellor of the Exchequer had it in. contemplation before the close of the present Session, to introduce any measure for carrying the Commercial regulations of the late Treaty with America into effect. The CHANCELLOR of the Excur.ausa said, the Hon Gentle Man must be atvare tlrut this could not at-present be done in any regular form, but here minded him"that a Bill was now in the 'House for regulating the trade t.vith America. • THANKS TO THE DUKE OF YORK.. Sir J. MAJORIBANKS disclaimed all personal views in the motion he was about to submit. .He' had not the honour even of being known to the Royal Duke : lie acted solely from a ctuiscientions feeling, that it tribute of respect and gratitude should be paid by that House to the services of the illustrious Duke. All - with tvhom he had con versed on the subject were of the same opinion, and spoke hi the highest terms of praise of the manner in which the Royal Duke had for so many xears conducted the affairs of the army, without any unfairness, or party-feeling, or prejudice.— He then alluded to the grand scene last Session in that House, when the Duke of Wellington re ceited their thanks, convev.i to him by the elo quent sptech of the Speaker; and•read the address of the Duke of Wellington in return, in: ,which his Grace complimented the Commander in Chief. He, was sore it was the earnest desire of the coon try, iliat-theAloyal Duke should reeeive sonic mark 'of gratitude, and he hoped what Mi nisters woiild take it into consideration, and bring forward the .subject early next Session.- Mau while, nothing could be more delightful to the Royal Duke's feelings, that' Yu receive the thanks, pt that House. He concluded by moving, that the Thanks of the House be g,iven,to his Royal nighties the Duke of s York, Captain-General am! Commanderiht Chief of the British Forces, for Iris • s contimfel, effectual, and unremi tiog at .teotion to the duties of his office during a period of 'more than '2O years, during which time the army. had improved in discipline and in science to an extent unknown before, and had, nuclei- Pro vidence, risen to the height of military glory. • , .The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER was far from opposing- the motion, which he thought would meet no dissentient voice ; yet , he thought such • a motion would have been more proper when the services of the army were brought to a close by the termination of the war. The House, however, would do justice to the feelings of the Hon. Member, though they might a little over step the sober judgment of the case. It was na tural, in the moment of enthusiasm, after thank ing the immediate actors in the late great event, to skew a grateful feeling towards that quarter in which the means were framed by`which such great achievements had been accomplished. The merit of our troops and our Officers in this great battle was briefly expressed' in the modest simplicity of the Duke of Wellington's dispatch ; but the whole might be seen to more advantage by looking at the accounts of our Allies and of the enemy. It was, indeed, a proud day wilco the Conqueror of Europe was dethroned by one battle. Much me rit must undoubtedly be due to the Duke ch . ' York, who had for so many years conducted and orga- nixed the army. General FERoussos was happy in the oppor tunity of giving a tribute of applause - to the Royal Duke for the improvement of the Army while under his command. Mr. WESTERN felt reluctance in objecting •to the motion, but he •must do so on constitutional grotinds. -He had no wish to - detract from the merits of the Duke .of Yell, but was ready to allow the full extent of his services : but had the Office of Comniander in Chief been held by 4uy other person, was it likely that they trould•hive heard of this motion.? 'There Was nuthing ' iit this More than in any other office. There..was no constitutional distinction bettv e en it an d the Ord mince, the Admiraliy, or the TreaSury. 'Was it ever contemplated to thabk either of those offices for doing their duty lie Would chalieoge a precedent tor such a motion.. A Commander in Chief was removeable like every other Officer. The time,. Milliner, and eilcumstances, of thiS motion were' extremely unfortunate. On the question of the Duke. of 'Cumberland's Marriage, the meritg Of the Duke of York had peen introduced ; and this mOtioir appeared to rise out of the rejection of the proposed allowatree to the Duke of •CuMberland> Perhaps 'the Hon:- Member would say that ' lie had.previously intended to move it ; but why hail he postponed it till now, with only three, days' notice ? If such a vote were passed, let• it be at the concltision of the war. His - objections to it were.of a constitutional nature. It-would form a had precedent, and in all views of it he must give it his negative. Sir J MAioatßANts explained. Mr. W. POLE was of opinion that a more fa= voorable opportunity might have beet' selected for the proposed vote ; •but when he saw that it had been brought forward, it would wear a strange appearance, indeed, if it did not meet with una nimous approbation. X.Vhat could they expect to be done for the army, if they refused to the Duke of York the Lair acknowledgment of his merit i Was - he, mit w i!hstanding his merit, to be deemed an undeserving•individtral, merely because he was. a Metitieer of the Royal Family ? If-it was uncon, stitutional to vote the thanks of the House to his Royal highness, because his future conduct might become die object of 'emisicleration, it had been equally irregular and equally unconstitutional -to vote their•thanks to • the Duke of Wellington.— Had the House precluded itself by that vote 'from investigating the future: public conduct of that illustrious Person - Certainly not. The vote nas a guarantee for his future conduct, but not against Parliament for their future - censure, should it be deserved. He was surprised that precedent should have been coldly calculated, when it was declared by the Duke of Wellington himself, that the vic tory which had shed so bright - a glory over the British nrms, could not have been won but for the improved condition of British troops, an im provement that had taken place entirely since the administration of "the Duke of York. " Never," as his Grace. had written to himself, " had he fought so hard for victory, and never, from the gallantry of the enemy, bad he been so near be ing beaten." He. had added an expression of his • astonishment at the paint of excellence, in every military quality, to which the British army had ‘ arrived ; and he hirnself - would now appeal to the }loose, to what cause was this excellence to- be traced but to the discriminating, impartial, and unwearied attention of his Royal Highness the Commander in Chief ? Mr. BARING- was convinced that nothing had been directed peronally by the Hon. Member for. Essex against the Commander ,in Chief. The only objection was upon a .constituflonal prin ciple, that the office held by-his Royal Highness partook more of a civil than.a. military character. He conceived, however, himself, that there was a difference in this respect. lie was not of opinion that this was the fittest occasion for coming to vote of this nature, but when proposed, and the awkwardness of 'withdrawing it considered, lie could not avoid giving it his hearty concurrence. With respect to a further pecuniary allowance, he thought there existed strong reasons for it - , not only on the ground of the gallant achievements and, the complete discipline of .the army, but in requital of the. assiduous attention, and the unre- Mitting official fatigues so rarely submitted to by persons of so high a rank. Vir.BooTee supported the motion. Colonel Wools-passed a high panegyric upon the 12010.3.1-Y administration of the Duke of York; as havi;ig !=nt only added greatly to the comforts of the. s,d , lier, but as having highly improved the tactics of the army. _ Mr. I'. METHIJEN declared himself in favour o the vote, 1\11;. WHITBREAD lamented much of the discus. sion that had taken place, and particularly that any contrast should hav e b een ex hibi te d bet weer. his Royal Highness and his predecessors. Upon some of the-points that 115 d been urged, the thanks of the House were equally due to the heads of the various other poblic departments which had in the due di . ;cliarge of their fun et ions contributed to the acquisition of so great a triumph. He could have wished, too, the suggestion °fan increased pecuniary allowance had 'been founded, not upon the present inadequacy Of that allowance, but on _ . the uterito►ious exertions, which had called for and justified an increase: As to the question in the present vote, he knew not how to Object to it without the appearance of ingratitude, after the noble tribute paid to his Royal Highness by the Doke of Wellington, on his l►►te memorable triumph. Notwithstanding, therefore, the warmth so unnecessarily introduced into the debate by the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. W. Pole), 4nd the importance of the Cons►itutional principle suggested by his Hop. Friend (Me. Western), he could nut withhold iris sanction . from the present vote. Lord BARNARD supported the motion. He con ceived that the .Duke of York was entitled to the Thanks of the House and the country, for the high discipline of the British army, which eni,ibled the Duke of Wellington to achieve the late splen did victory. 'Mr. Sec jeant BEST denied that the motion was unconstitutional, and thought that the thanks of the House should he given, not only to the Duke of Yolk and the Duke of 'Wellington, but to an other illustrious Personage (the _Prince Regent,) who had appointed them to their situations, and who rejected the counsels of those who advised the abandonment - of the Spaniards, whin the Duke of Wellington was shut up within the passes of Torres Vedras. Never was any Government more prosperous than that of the Prince, and if no other person brought forward a motion of thanks to his Royal Highness, he should feel it his (WI to offer such a motion, notwithstanding his unfitness, from the situation he filled under his Royal Highness, as Prince of Wales. Alderman SMITI4 supported the motion, as well as Mr. • ~~ddinaton. FoßsEs was in favour of a pecuniary re ward, as he understood that the Duke of York laboured 4t present•tider difficulties. Mr. HART DAVIS spoke on the same side.-- After a few words front Sir J. MAJoRIBANKs in re ply, the questiou wAs put and carried. favour of the mAi:SSiZE OF BREAD BILL. LEMS pfesented a Ileeition signed by 800 bakers ii _ . Mr. AldermanATKlNS presented a Petition from the mas ter and wardius of the Olporation of :Ja i is a4aiust it, A Parr A g 06' Mr. F. LEWIS said, that although, fitni s e re r. tions, tions, it would seem that there was an oppos it :;, ° ; o o `6,-e• went in the trade about the measure, the Pa",,',. - ,tlle - l o it sented was from practical bakers, and he was s— As tv rf jority really'coneerned in the trade weie for it. d 3 O r corporate body of the Bakers' Company, he beli ere but great proportion of them were not really baker s ' factvirs and tnillers. f th e si b' Alderman ATKINS observed, that the prayer ° the' tiort•that he presented was only for time to consider . Of ject morefully.g et Alderman C. SMITH conceived that the bakers g approved of the act. h bad b t 6 at Mr. - ROSE was convinced, f rom th e evidence xe- - e jient -b before the Committ ee , th a t it wou ld b e very eio , ,„/ the Bill should pass in the cours e o f the pr,esen c t b re ad 15C Mr. LocKtimur th o u g ht th a t th e fact 01 is dearer by two-pen c e a l oa f i n L on d on , than it ,wa s o d for where there was h o ass i ze , was f u ll y su ttioientg r° , " experimental Bill for at l e a s t a y ear . The Bill went through th e C omm ittee; and ~ 13' 11 Up the eport, - tl' e 4 4$ Mr. F R . LEWIS proposed, as an "' a mendment , ' " 4)0 fm should riot take effect till the Ist of September, irj agee, to, and the Bill was o rd e red to be rea d. t 1/ 1 ' to The H -morrow. - ackney Coach Bill was re toned, .an- °r deij to read a third time to-mor row . l SHIP LETTER BILL. p • CO-1•1; The East India Ship Letter Bill passed througb 3 1,0 4 ., , tee, wlivn s e v e ral new Cl ause s were brought 1” . Nir dt,o-P r INGTON, and the Report was ordered to be re ceive row.—Adjourned. FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZE.I"O' h r Doun"ng-d Plea' Ci G a reet, July 3, 1815. wt;es His Royal Highness the P r i nce R ege nt has - in the name and on th e b e h a lf o f hi s Majesty, to o f Francis M'N a u g ht en , Knight, to be one of the '1(1311'4 Supreme C our t o f Judicature at Bengal. ,2 1 ) 00 be nest: ha , also been pl ease d, i n th e name and 0 0 ! his Majesty, to appoint Sir Ed mu nd SttutleY:':licatil f. one of the Judges o f th e S upreme • Court of , Madras. BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED.' iron, fieli fa Joseph Graha m , M a dd o x- street, H anover - s quare, '- July 8 to Augnst 26. . BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED' ve peP ti , Charles Cosier, Wend o v er , B uc ki ng h a mshire, sh * F ine - trlA ti - George Outhwaite, Pancras-lane, City of Lund' n ' Jo l h s n: N a V n h d i te, Augustil' e bl l , e 2 1 , -- e a ß t i e l t e N e t n , l :S ß a o ti t u P G t l ' l r u w S i l a . d r h k a , 1 i v . i C t 8 a I l Atto e- r a l 0 .1 ; 31 - Cri: e Lang, Aerica=square. ' -- v Francis Alessi t er , F rom e -S e l woo d , S onicrs etshire ,s ,lg t e aPli in July 24, 25, and Augnst 18; a t e l e ven, at the t 7, frOlP ' Frome-Selwo o d. Att orn i es Mr. Gilbert R o t!cn .eri or Mr. Thomas Edwards, Surrey-street, StrandLoat4los,y, William Warne, Bedford-street, Covent-garden'i.o Attoo„. July I I, 28, and August 15, at ten, at Guilelhal _.„, s qll i 'dj Mr, John James Wilson, Dorset-street, SalishtniJaaa, r,m John__ Dangerfield, Whitechapel-market, hay -s ,, a , e t 'anel , 9, 15, and Aug , tst 15, at ten, at Guildhall. 4" ~ pli , Coates, Paul-street, Finshury-square. „tree' , i,st " 11 8 i I I : e. i s al s lsl.L . Ei l n ( l.) : Fp i gt r l i. sa l t tl t l o lC l s l orton v iorn l w , Ifambers, Throgln ni iilerf an, ilf_f o Ju l ! t of England. et, $ 1 keel' GOA John Smell, Great Torrington, Devonshire,_o,_°P.loo, ,• 9 8 , 29, and August 15, at twelve, at the Gl"n e i ilawl e t • Torrinton. Attornies, Messrs. Kingdon. ,'-right,.al , ' 10 'Great Tot rington, or Messrs. Anstice- and Temple, London. July if aantdtie_ina,wkact, Gpuriilldi Princes -stye Jul! ipi John Broom Farrant, Fferrivock, DerOnshire, i l i -i n ; t n or l . A A u t g t u o s r t n . i l e s s , , a x t i e r r , e " s; a e t i i . r , e a n t , the White 14 .. " Mi. 1431 Wellington , °I . 14, Salishury-squa re. ' - 19 a " t 0 . John Baker, Northampton, woolstapler, J u ly Sand August 15, at ten, at the George fun, 'a e ll t °' Attornies, Mr. William Lucas, Newporvra6 oft John Alexander, New-square. Lincoln's inn; iv qs„at w a r Matthew Knowl e s, Marple, Cheshire, t an ner, dt b ., , ,., Lim.4.00 29, at ten, and August 15, at four, a t the Ge°Wedfora •- rington. Attornies, Mr. Norris, John-strese, m , R9O or Mr: Garth Warrington. _,.... a t sits . 9 ti ou Thomas Hook, Garth, Yarmouth. miller, JulY. oast , ~,,,i RamPal' l dee 9i3 at nine.'and'Angust lf,, at four, at the ilo cau Norwich. Attornies, -Messrs. Bleasdale, -;00,1•30j. llohne, New Inn, London, or Mr. S. King , ,:ic C O- 9 2 .'11. -" - Joseph Levy, Boston,, Lincolnshire, iewetler, ,fo:o3os,•':iiag, , ies s._• l " ° August 15, at eleven, at the White Hart ' rs Attornies, Mr. William Bowles, Boston, oe ' at efi ef. - ton and Hall, Secondaries' Office, Temple• an d 15, , WO; Thomas Boss, Liverpool, tailor, August ', 2 ' mr. josia" a oo at the York Hotel s Liverpool. Attornics, s. Keat seY , liamson, Leigh-street, Liverpool, or Nlessr vivr e!, nu f a ct' , „ a , Spurr, Bishops ate Within• July 17, 18, and August 15, at nj,ney at Maucliest William Brown, Wigan, Lancashire; cotton-ninon! yi e V s of Manchester: Attornies, Mr. Barrdsc', Messrs. Milne and Parry, Temple. ' DIVIDENDS. - ' rt. I.7 i i ' l ' e c c : - ' --1 . ly g. t o n, erg Lil J ,e u i l l y „, 2 o s l; J ii . l G er ti c i l l i d a , nt L_ jonudloynsn.lelrvc.hantu crosto-,._„cer"" _roipre,Yr.ll3alcrtie7-63.140::: Iddon; w _ hur y, gl, - ',„.aiw' July siiire '2lsi linen — ii n j i u , lyE2ss6c.xl-draper s li ' S ° ltr°e ,,7 i ' o s : ti ta ni s lire--- ,:r s t ;' ker—JulyNV: Pugh, Berwiek-street, .0 J 5 .. E p . a P u i l l , l Pillow, e l s a t t e e r, ,ofCi coach-makert e rbury_ L marke t .• v , Shields, grocer—Aug. 9. • J. Wallialen,. .deverle),:nir.../r rough, innkeeper—July 26. -G. Harwoo!, ..t00a,,,,j, tualler—July 29. J.,White, Windsor-terraketi,,,ivg, 11k, chant—July 25. J. Powell, Soutliiimptonb .."_';'., g 5, t r ,l)l . 1 .. / July 26. T. Russell, Beverley, victualler -4"') Little rrltaffOr ° of C. Hill, and A. H. Althans, Union cornfactors—July 25. J. Russel, late of shire, gu n-barrel-man u fact tirer—JulY Bury-street, St. Mary Axe, !mai-ass-1 a .ei_avoi ,fa . li 15 , t Spencer, late of IVolferhampton, gun-bariehant•--Jul.,stree ' 2 / 1 5. ker -- 1 •tU ref fr. late : f olae Gordon, T. Steadman, and S. Howland, ~„e 0 July 26. R. Dodson, late of Liverpool, rat er of pore , übu rtio merchants— ,July 27. W. Stackhouse, 1"1. Acoungi.mor jbv.eswielearp,i-l-saoo?t,to,:. linen-draper. i_ronm CERTIFICA'rES—Iviy 95 * / 'OO/ late of I; tes 1.3 0 P. B; Jones, late of Birmingham, bardwarernan--"obetej, ink street, wine-rnerchant —J• - of" versmith—J. Phillips, onger—E. Appleton, Manchester, cottusoiloanil) o r cabinet-makers—J. Sharp, sen. and C. Sharp, jun. noroseY, Throesifr abjnet-paliers—J. O'Brien, Copthall-buildingst.l4,, ,ior ton-street, instnance:broker—J. Thropp, •Birniqbvietti,,' • Kelly , Windmill-street, Finsbury-square' 'tirig W Chur ard, Fressingfield,,,Suffolk ~0-rocer---'-`• sea. Monkton Comb, So; t loth - Needham, uerset, c Chester, dealer. late of Prickett-.,r • _ COAL MARKET, Jubl g • p r ice , git. Ships at, Market. Ships sold. 49 6 ' 0.- 51 Newcastle 71 Sunderland 31 1 ''''''' 399: 0~• I'l 435• 21, , '''' 41s. , Blit'lliS. wickshice ti, f • On 'Saturday, the 24th of June, at fiartiT on sunda 9.. .ady of ti .. • last, at Broom-place, the Lady of L''r ilamp Proct } tD 6 itectori r chter , wet, On Alo .. or, 11. N., of a . :ea, aJr:tiSliceltiir)l.efie 9 u,, f ,ft, d t :i ° : l3,3(r. .!I(l,ty.litst, at his house in Lipper Broo.Vr. '''' George Webster), Bart. of a *on and " Laity of Sir C Yesterday, O n FijaT latSt at St. I, • y. Esq . of the .Na". ' A Clar, . • le 1\ avy-01tice, to Miss Ann e ePr r• heath. . Holmes Jackson, P.; , .q., o f Gleinnore. tot r % f 130 , ter of the 1 t ' ' - a e . uhn Whyte Melville, I , s l l- :', of ca pta o- 4 Stratbliion . esi. , f,q„ • t oo Lately, at F.dinbur t ., ,, h, James Pall Yfol,le, c b r istili''' h ire. the M arq „i 3 Ely East Indianian, to Mail 0, p ee blc s daughter of Sir dailies Natuyth. Bart. of l'''' s I‘JIIA111111? e l :V E. S 'l :. liolbort.),lfte• W. Bea'' ' CI rch 1-lanorer-squjirir'cijaiigto I Le e s s t e j r o d i a n y . m to7, ll E in s g t; Street, . • ole' stre , Eicodc• land „ On the 27th alt. atfChertgey,.Alr.<.l3eniati"° 01 , t he 15 0 ,„ • at hi s h o u se ) CiPP.c.r %/7"°9 km the t4th of 3wit • I tat Breiteciorfc%o,3, "fJava,Georoe A ' dr , s q son 0 1 ; I , e Spe c r) ILs,„ „ iistus -suulS 01 . or o f Bengal, heir tl• to the Audi tor, & c . a 1.4,1c,r5, Lan:l'S ( 1 ) 3 N . 1)( . ; au )N liv ,J. CAltSl'.:l I , tl; l , l \,.;:.„'f' , rir t ' i -1 5 ,,,any!I;v.It'• r e Oinc:F., Nu. 114, stiand; bvatiu-r` at lite Su meats,&e. Jai s