The Sun. — London, England, 1820-07-05 00:00:00

PARLIAMENT, HOUSE OF LORDS, TUESDAY, JULY 4. On the Motion of the Loan CHANCELLoK, it we% ordered that the Learned Jokes do Attend the Montt on Friday next ; and that a Counsel on eacb side he heard relative to the question of the Claim to the Stafford Peetage• Oo the Motion of Lord KnwvoN, the second reading of the Labourers' Wages Sill, was fixed fur The Earl of LAunkRDALE gave notice of his in tention to move on Monday for •he production of certain official documents, respecting the conduct ola near and dear relative of his (General Sir T. Maitland), in reference to the lonian Isles, and moved that the Lords be summoned for that day, which Was ordered accordingly. Lord AUCKLAND moved the second reading of the Insolvent Debtors' Bill, which accordingly took place, and was, on his Lordship's motion, -committed for Thursday. The Noble Lord ob served, that it was his intention contingently to move for the re-commitment of the Bill, on a Tutore day. On the Motion of the Marquess of LASIsDOWN, son►e additional documents., dispatcl►es from Go vernor Baffles in the year 1819 respecting the affairs of Java, were ordered to be laid before the ,!4,1p. The Irish Commercial Credit Bill was read the third an►l passed. Die Sessions Appeal aryl Special Constables Bills passed through Committees. THE QUEEN. REPORT OF THE SECRET COMMITTEE. The EArl of HARROWBY presetaed the Report of their Lordship's Secret Committee on the In closed Papers retpecting the conduct of her Ma- Testy 'lie Queen. This document was read by the Clerk, and is as folloWS :- By the Lords Committees appointed a Secret Committee to examine the Payers laid before the House of Lords on Tues day, the 6th of -Time last, in two sealed bags, by his Majesty's command, and to report thereupon as they shall see fit, and to whom have been since referred several additional papers in two sealed bags relative to the subject matter of his Ma jesty's most gracious Message of the 6th of -Tune last, " Ordered to Report, That the Committee have examined, with all the attention dae to so important a subject, the do cuments which have been laid before them, and they find that those documents contain 'allegations supported by the con curring testimony of a-great Humber of persons in various situations of life, and resiaing. in different parts of Europe, which deeply affect the honour of the Queen, charging her Majesty with an adulterous eonnection with a foreigner. ori ginal/y in her service in a menial capacity, and attributing to her Male sty a continued series ofcnisdiect highly unbecom ing-her Majesty's rank and station, and of the most licesstimo character. These charges appear to be calculated so, deeply to affect, not only the h'mour olthe Queen, but also the dig nity of the Crown, and the moral feeling and. honour of Om Country, that in their opinion, it is indispensable-that they should become the subject of a solemn Inquiry; which it ap pears to the Committee may he best effected in the course of a Leg siative proceeding: the necessity of which they can not but most deeply deplore." The Report treiog'read, The Earl of LIVERPOOL stated, that in come qeence of the Report of their Lordship's Secret Committee, he rose to give notice, that he should to-morrow present a Bill in reference to the sub ject matter of the Report. is taking such a course he was persuaded their Lordships would feet disposed to consult the convenience of the illustrious Person whose conduct is in que. , ,tion, as to the time in which such a measure should be farther proceeded in by the House; but on that point he could farther explain when the Bill should be brought in to-morrow. lie then moved that the Lords be summoned for that day. Earl Gaily observed, that the subject to which the Noble Earl's notice referred was one of the greatest importance, and one which should be proceeded upon with the most solemn deliberation and caution. He did not think the•mere reading of the Report constituted an adequate ground for that decisive coarse of proceeding adverted to.— As a Member of 'Parliament his wish was to render strict and impartial justice. lie must repeat that ,recerit occurrences did not leave the case of the accused person in that state in whit!: it was ori ginally presented to the House ; and he must again condemn the course pursued, in which Ministers, instead of acting upon their own constitutional responsibility, threw it on a Committee of the house of Lords, which they appointed to sit in judgment on this most delicate sad important case ; and this was the more reprehensible, as it appeared that the House were to be called upon to ;tit in their judicial eapscity• To this they ought to come with unbiassed minds ; but they *were, in effect, now told, that the Illustrious Person bad formed an adulterous connection wilt one of her menial set vants : and further, that she had pursued a long course of licentioesness. A similar course, be must repeat, was never before adopted, and now the Committee tell the House that inquiry is indispensable. The charge, instead of the sva y adopted, should be brought in a manner the best calculated for investigation. But by, whom was it brought ) —by those very Ministers who, but a short time before, were willing to com promise the question ;—who were willing to continue the Qtieen in her Regal capacity, and to give instructions to our Ministers in Foreign Countries so to consider her. These were the el y Ministers who now tell them that the Queen is exposed and liable to accusations the most seri ous, What then could he said of those Ministers Who were in ; possession of all those alleged facts, and had slept upon such matter of charge for so many months, which it was their duty. to the pub lic to have brought forward without delay ? They Au length came forward at a period when the egi, ',llion of the public mind, and tire bent of ths public opinion, were in a most -critical and clues lionable state ; and on the ground of a Report of 1 -their own Committee, unsupported by alequate proof in any shape ; and in a wanner which went to compromise not only the honour of the Crown,. but the safety of the Country ; and -all this upon. such authority, and upon .such . grouts - as were the case was rougnt A\ forward, the nature or the extent at fe;ist of the charge was not known, nor the characters or.de scriptions of the witnesses. All this was clone upon the authoritative opinion of the Committee. He hoped when the Noble Esrl should come to explain the nature of tile proceeding to-morrow, Ise would furnish the House with a distinct state ment of the charge, the time proposed to be al lowed, and also some information respecting .the witnesses—as he must say, the mode in which the case now seemed to present itself, was one against which he would feel it his duty to protest, as tnilitating ageinst every principle of law and justice. The Earl of EIARROWRY could assure the House that be as deeply and anxiously felt as the Noble Earl possibly could do, the importance and the arduousness of the present case ; but he differed widely from him in the view he took of it in other respects. The Noble Earl accused his Ma jesty's Government of gross acts of injustice to• wards her Majesty in the course they adopted ; but he must contend that it ever there was a mode, in favour of which, under all the circum stances of time case, the House had decidedly ex pressed its sense, it was that about to be proposed. A previous Myth y on all sides had been deemed advisable, and no case whateier could more de cidedly call for one. Time present was a case of that nature that only the one mode of proceeding presented itself to their choice. The Conimittee had heels already appointed; but the Noble Lord opposite said, that if Ministers were in possession of the information, they ought to have volun tarily, and without delay, instituted some pro ceedine. They were in the event, by the evident necessity of the case, driven to institute the pre sent proceeding, revolting, as in souse senies, it might appear. Earl GREY begged to say a word in.explana tion. Such conduct was attributed to her Ma jesty its the report, as he thought, admitted of no comment. The Earl of HARROWHY continued---With re spect to the consideration of having the evidence in their possession, and not speedily bringing far ward the charge, he thought, that if they (Mi nisters) had to look back upon any part of their conduct with a more particular satisfaction, it was that of their having anxiously endeavoured to avoid the investigation. Her Majesty had the option to stay in any part of Europe, where she might spend the rest of her days in ease and com fort ; and if ever men could feel jtistified in mak• frig a sacrifice even of their character for con sistency; it would be on an occasion of the kind. They must have blotted out the impression of all they had heard, in reheated discussion, from their miuds; if they considered the reference of the pa. pets alluded to, to a Committee -ot their Lord ships, in any other light than as a preliminary reference to a Grand Jury ; and with rwspett to delay in ulterior proceedings,. instances were. fre quently known of accused parties not having been brought to trial for intervals more or less long atter the charges were made. The Earl of CARNARVON strongly impugned the course taken by Ministers, and could not avoid censuring their conduct in ordering the prepara tions for a Coronation to continue at such a time ; indeed he deemed it contrary to every principle of common decency. The present time was pc-. cidiarly unfortunate for the proceedings about to be adopted, as a strong feeling was certainly pre-, velem in the public mind. He also censured the expunging of her Majesty's bailie: f'r dill 11C Li turgy, which must be regarded es'anenticisPitOtf: slur upon her Majesty, a measure more calculated to insult than to show the wish to do ample , justice, either to the Queen or the Country. No man was less di-posed to regard the idle clamours of dangerous men as the sense and feeling of Ore Country than himself ; but he really thought that in deference to the known sense of the great body of the community, decency, as well as pro deuce, should have induced some postponement of the proceedings resolved upon beyond the pre sent period. 'Lhe Earl of DARNLEY made a few observations in support of the arguments urged by Noble Lords at his side of the House. Earl GRET spoke in explanation ; and referring to the language of the Report, again contended that such alleged conduct admitted of no. com promise whatever, consistent with the honour and dignity of the Crown, more especially when it ad witted it to be a great public question, and in volving tqually the honour of the Crown, and the best interests of the Country. Notwithstanding. all these great considerations, Ministers were ing to co_nsent to an arrangement to leave her Majesty in possession of the greater part of her honours ; and to confer upon her 50,0001. per annum, out of the money of the people. On the contrary, be (Loud Grey) thought, if they had evidence to support the allegations in the Report, no offer of compromise should ever have been made• The Earl of LIVERPOOL, in answer to tbeNoble Lord (Grey's) observations, observed he had not the least difficulty in saying, that be entertained an opinion directly the reverse from that express ed by the Noble Lord. Assuming 'bat Ministers had been in possession of the information for months, he was still prepared to maintain that if her Majesty had- continued abroad, the evils. and inconvenieucies which were now forced upon them (his Majesty's Ministers) were deemed so great, that upon every principle of public expe diency it was fit to abstain from the course event ually forced upon them. Nor was this the opi nion of Ministers only, it was.that of ninety-nine persons out of every one hundred throughout the country j and he would maintain, that under all the circumstances, and with a reference to the course of human affairs, no individual could truly say, that with a due tegatd to the peace or safely of the public, it was not their duty, her as Statesmen or risen, to take those great points into their serious consideration. He was not afraid to meet the charge upon these grounds ;. „and lur tlitr, that admitting every thing - before tte-Ccm mittee was known to Ministers for some months, it was, notwithstanding, prudent and expedient to act as his Majesty's Government hut done; and he Must say, that when the Queen had come to this country under such circumstances, then the iquektion which before presented itself, was not .overlooked--that the conduct they now adopted wittforcied upon them, and there was no alterna tive. In another point ot view, they had adopted the least ot two evils. The Marquess of BUCKINGHAM defended the course adopted. What was done, proceeded from the hope that some.satisfactory compromise might_. take place: In these efforts he had concurred with satisfaction, and in the endeavour not to disturb the peace and tranquillity of the country, or wound the peace and honour of the Royal family ; hut when they found that the deciiion was forced upon them—when they found that all hopes of accommodation were at an end, they went into•'the liiquiry in the most constitutional manner that preseifted itself. With respect to 'eveiy part -Of the Report, the utmost unanimity prevailed in-the Conunittee. Lord HOLLAND was aware of the nature of the decision which a majority of the House had come to ; but one difference existed, and a strong one he thought it was, viz;--that the House approved of the negotiation without a knowledge of the charges ; whereas, Ministers entered into them with a knowledge of the nature of the charges. The Noble Earl opposite, be must say, bad never stated upon what ground he thought the Inquiry should not be gone into, if the Queen bad nut come to England ; and why, because she bad come, the Inquiry became necessary. With re spect to the whole proceeding, it was, he thought, from the very bi , giniiing, unnecessary ; it was alike unjust to tke Individual, derogatory to the honour of the Crown, and to the character of that House. The question was then put ; the Lords were or dered to he summoned for to-morrow, and the House Adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS. The House was occupied till half past five with two Ballots for Committees for the Chester and Grantham Election Petitions. The following are the names of the Defaulters on the Ballots : Earl Bective, Lord Castlereagh, Lord G. Cavendish, tier jeant Copley, %V. A. Ellis, --Fine, .1. I'. Grant, Hun. C. Lowndes, F. .1. Needham, Sir E. 0' Brian, J. Plummer, G. Prendergast, lion. Robert Smith, Charles Wetherell. These ,Nlernbers were, in conformity with the established usage of the House, ordered to be taken into custody by the Serjent at Arms. Lord G. Cavendish, Lord Castlereagh, Mr. W. A. Ellis, Mr. Serjeant Copley, together with almost all the other Mem bers above named, were in the course of the evening seve rally reported to be its custody, and on a motion being made to that effect, were ordered to be discharged on, payment of their fees. CHESTER ELECT; Mr. LEE brought up a List pointed by Ballot to serve on tl The me.s wtre as follow : Bobt. Morgan John NlaxwOl -Sir T. E. Winnington J. Lockhart. Sir J. Nlajolibanks Benj. Uaikell l I H. Davis lON COMMITTEE. of the Names of Members ap his Coulruittee. Hon. H. Legge W. Evans W. NVigram Hon. E. Cnst Hon. W. Lamb Alexander Boswell Thomas F. Lewis. Hue. F. A. Pretty As the ' , tames of the Members chosen. to constitute .the Committee on the Grantham Election Petition, were partly called over before the doors of the Gallery were opened, we cannot present a correct report of them. The following. we understand to be anion the number : Sir Robert Heron - E. Buller Mr. Tennison Joshua Walker Sir J. Stuart H. Hart Hon. J. Wodebouse .1 E. Riigers. R. Blake Mr. T. WILSON presented a Petition from Distillers of R e ctifi e d Spirits in and about London, setting forth the in juries they were likely to derive frOm the admission of Irish Spirits into-this country.---Ordered to lie on the 'fable. Mr. MAXWELL presented a Petition from certain Ship Owners of the Port of ClasgoW, against the proposed altera tion in the Laws respecting the importation of Foreign Tim-. tier.--Referred to the Committee on Foreign Trade. _ The Population Bill was read a third time and passed: (The object of this Bill a to.cause an accurate estimate to be taken of the population of (=refit Britain.) CRIMINAL. LAWS; Sir JAMES MACKINTOSH moved the third read ing of Three Bills relative to certain- amendments: in the Criminal Laws of the country, standing on. the Orders of the Day for that evening. 'The Privately Stealing in Shops Bill, and. the- Capital Felonies Repeal Bill, were then read a third time and passed. THE. CAPITAL FELONIES COMMUTATION BILL, On the third reading of the Capital Felonies Commutation of Punishment Bill, Mr..MARTIS (of Galway) said, he really felt some difficulty al to this Bill, as far as. related to. one part of it, which went to put upon the same: footing a man who demolished' a shrub not worth 3tL and a man who destroys so valuable and use ful an animal as. a horse. They , had a terrible example before them of .one mant who de-stroyetl eleven horses. The object which he was desirous., of attaining was, that a horse should be placed.on the footing of property. He asked whether it was just to put a man wbo demolishes a shrub not worth a shilling, and a man. who destroys eleven horses to the value of 20 or 30,0001. on the same footing of punishment. He was desirous of pro.- posing a Clause, by way of rider, which would have the effect or leaving it in the option of the Magistrates to punish such offences with trans portation for life, or for a shorter period. The difficulty which he complained of in this Bill, was •itsobscurity in certain parts. It enacted, that for the killing of animals there should be no pu nishment only as tar as malice could be proved.— What would the Hon. and Learned Gentleman (Sir J• Mackintosh) say to the case of that men who was hanged at Newmarket for having de stroved eleven horses. He presumed no malice could be proved in that instance against the owner. The man was only employed by persons who bad an interest of the nature of ."- play or pay" in the matter. If it was not, as. he had en deavoured to spew, that there ought to be a dis tinction of offence in these cases as he had put them, then this: man had been murdered. Sir JAMES :11ACKINTOSII said, that the lion. Gentleman's remarks did not so much apply to this Bill as to the Law itself as it at present stood. His objections were not as to what the Bill does, but what it does not. He was glad to receive the suggestion of any Hon. Gentleman on whose turf education had been better than his awns but lie, begged the Hon. Gentleman to observe, that his (Sir Mackintosii'm) mmt'utlments did not go to change the character of the law with referen e e to offences, but merely with respect to pu nish mews. The Bill was then read a third time and Pas s C t ... A Person from the Bank of England broog b _ 111) Paper, purporting to hien account Bb d total amount of Bank Notes in circulation.--48/' on the table. • Mr. Brown, Keeper of Newgate, brough t l e Paper, containing a List of the Name-5- 411 7 " o Bankrupts who rind .been e.ntnntitted to NerJ ~. since the year 'SOO —Laid-dn-tb'e table. , • Sir \V. CuuTts obtained z leAve to bring 'n ig Bill for the better ordering and regulating of Militia of the City of London. [For the remainder of the Proceedings of the 'House of C °ll3, mons, see the Fourth Page.] ROM the LONDON GAZETTE of July 4. , Carlton-House, Jane 94, 1840. The King has been pleased to appoint Alleyne Lor d AAA et Helen's to be one of the Lords of his Majesty's Bedehaul' in the room of Lord Charles spencer, deceased. Whitehall, July 3, ISM. The King has been pleased to order a congd d'clite t° na the Great Seal, empowering the Dean and Chapter of 'llO Cathedral Church of Bristol to elect a Bishop of that See'i t te name being void by the death of Dr. Wm. Lori Mansel, Jatej Bishop thereof; and the King has also been pleased ft ' O9 commend to the said Dean and Chapter, the Rev. J• t ile Kaye, Doctor in Divinity, Master of Christ College, i" University of Cambridge, and Regius Professor of Divinityjo the said University, to be by them elected Bishop of the' Sec of Bristol. Croton-o,ce, July 4, 180. Members returned to serve in this present Parliatne.albi City of Dublin—Thomas Ellis, of the said City, Esq. ll'. room of the Right Hun. Henry Grattan, deceased. Borough of Ennis—Richard Wellesley, of the City of 14 - don, Esq. in the room of Sir Ros Mahon, Bat. Borough of Nlalmesimry—Wi s lliarn Lake, r of Dcvon shlre- ; street, Portland-place, Esq. f City of York—Robert Chaloner, Esq. in the roost Hon. L. Dundas (now Lord Dundas.) Borough of Peterstield—Sir Philip Musgrave, Bart. _ - - - —. . , 0 Commission in the Ist Regiment of Royal Surrey Mili ti a" -! Theophilus Ellis, Esq. to be Captain. I Commissions signed by the Vice. Lieutenant of the Coup ' , Stafford:— pii To be Deputy Lieutenants—E4lward Jerris Ricketts, i, Swynfen Jervis,Esq.; John Davenport, Esq.; Ralph Polo Esq.; Hush Booth, Esq,; William Shepherd Kinoc t Esq. M.P. Commissions signed by the Lord Lieutenant of the E st IIA ing of the County of York : ;-,; PO Richard Bethel!, Esq. to be Vice-Lieutenant, vice , Sr• - r Masterruan Sykes, Bart. resigned. t i 5 14 , -Chary (3 r t , - ' -Chary a' tie Deputy Lieutenants— , ,oarles tirimsten, George Palates, Esq.; the Right Honourable Beatnuodt Hutlatu. BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. U. Butcher, Cambridge, scrivener. BANKRUPTS. „411, A. M Tatiana, Postern-row, Tower-hill, Loudon, to surrender July 11, 18, and August 15, at eleven, at CloicV hall. Attorney, Mr. Rippon, Great Surrey-street, friars'-road. 160 'sly 9!(:rf" C. Wright, Old Fdrd, Middlesex, wharfinger, Jul)! z'! ( ;,, and Angust 15, at twelve, at Guildhall. Attorney, M r ' lihrand, Austin-ftiars. as 8 J. Hyde, Stayley-bridge, Cheshire, merchant, Aug- 7,aelflp six, and 15, at eleven, at the Ramsdea's Arms, Hudderosor s orkshire. Attornies, Mr. Brown, Saddleworth ; and Mc Brundiett, Spinks, and Reddish, Temple, London. , biro S. Stead, Clough House-mills, Huddersfield, Yor"l,,cti corn-factor, Aug. 8, at six, 9, and 15, at eleven, at the, soe horse Inn, Huddersfield. Attornies, Messrs. Fisher a 'n r .i, - ,4 0 low, Tharies-inn, London; and Messrs. Clough and P r Huddersfield. • 30 R. Lee, Kingston-upon-Hull, merchant,' July 14, ho; Aug. 15, at eleven, at the Dog and Du c k Ta vern Scale - 0r Attornies, Messrs. ( tosser and Son, Bartlett's-building , born, London; and Messrs. T. and C. Frost, Hull. th J. M. Simson, Elmstead, Essex, deal e r in cattle, J ll lii, 95, and Aug. 15, at eleven, at the Thorn Inn, Mestley. /; lof Attornies, Mr. Ambrose, Nlanningtree, Essex; and Croker, Nassau-street, Soho, Loudon. i t ,refs T. Hoyle, Wadslyurth, y.orkoiu,,avanufwittalw July 22, 94, and Aug. 1-5, at three, at thj Warren. BuTeoft Arms Inn, S,tockpoo,, Cheshire. Attornies-, Ur. Bad* do Stockport; and Messrs. Millie and Parry, Temple. , J. Rood, Portsmouth, common brewer, July 18,1:;:chit Aug. 15, at twelve, at Guildhall. Attornies, Mr. T. x"" (ipir Verulatn-buildings, Gray's-inn; and Mr,T. A, Minebif ) '" port, or at St. George's-square, Portsea. c t q f P J. Jeeves, St. Ives, Huntingdonshire, hatter, Ju!i c% i nt"- and Aug. 15, at ten, at the Star Inn, Islaneliestrr. Att ° lsi ,o, Mr. J. Walker, Manchester ; and Mr. Ellis, Chancery j ot , W. Holmes, Brinsitigton, Chesterfield, flottr-dealer,JVcA at six, 18, and Aug. 15, at eleven, at the Commercial 1'..4011 Chesterfield. Attornies, Mr. Stevenson, Lincoln's -4° t, Messrs. Drabble and Waller, Chesterfield. W. Oldham, Hop-gardens, St. Martin's-lane, Westulooilir warehouseman, July 11, 18, and Aug. 15, at eleven, at..,,,t0° 1 hall. Attornies, Messrs. Windle, Perkins, and Gray's-inn; and Mr. Thomson, Manchester. DIVIDENDS. • ri fil itif July 11, H. Fourdrinier, Cannon-street, and S. Four J o, Charing-Cross, paper manufacturers-July 25, S. 6° ,1 ) 05 Cornhill, chart saller--July, 25,J. Knight, Forc-stree t, ,4olo. - monger-July 29, A. Wray, Tokenhouse-yard, July 25, W. A. Bragg, Rotherhithe-wall, shipwrig ht 8, T. Kendle, Great Yarmouth, woollen-draper-4°V; q 5,4, Leadbitter, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, linen draper-4 111 1;60); k , Hudson, Birchin-lane, merchant-July 29. E. lin) o va.; Mary lebone-st., poniterer-July 25, B. Foot,Graerchl..,/qt_.' tavern. keeper-July 29,T. Moore, Paddington, flott!*.'ro, July 25, D. Cox, High-street, 13orougb, stationer -- - ",4; . n S. Newman, Finsbury-place, merchant-July. 25, ' 0 0 wards, Dartford, Kent, grocer-July 25, J. Bea rt iort/, Cavendish -street, wing merchant-InlY 25 , S. 1 u QS, 0 Charlotte-street, Portland-place, merchant -July Blow, W hitt les ford, Cambridge, maltster-July 25, i t ' _ L p and S. Sharman, Leicester-square, linen-drapers IC Taylor, Witney, Oxford, rnealnaan---Ju/y 25, W* Y•' SO.* IM gate, Toithridge,Kent,,banker-July 25,,J. Dawes, iuu, It. H. (Trott, and R. Barwick, Pall-mall, banisisfs - 1,015 P. Morgan.aud, A ..Strother, Crescent, Minor ies, „on, Aug. 29, L. and J. Phillips, High Holborn, glass-a!•o‘i July, 29, P. H. Delaware, itowford„ auctioneer-41 11. U , s'• Forbes, Bristol,. draper. • - 41/ Pitrt CERTIFICATES-Jutx 96. - ' l2a. E J. Slater, Manchester., innkeeper--. 1. Adkirsi, miller-S. Co welL,• Sutton-. at_ Hone,- Kant,- • „ o, r_, . 11 4 Stratton,. Stow on the Wold, Gloucestershire, 1 ,04 - ‘,7 f , ; !ham- W. Whitehouse, Tewkesbury, linen:drapef`'',o l) ., i l sett. G. Yates, and . T. Yates; jun. Yate• Bank, cottonrspinners , -G. Wilkins, Bradford, Wiltshirv,,vl7...edi l ~i,~~ d /. COURS.E OF EXCHANGE, Jun? 4. • Arnstei dam . , . It- 5 - . - • • Ditto, at Sight - AI 0: •,; Rotterdam .19 - 5 A t iO Antwerp - * .01,4 Haukburgh 37 5 ' gi, ~.4 ` Altuna .I. Paris, S Day's_ sight .. .........,...._..,. 2 ---- SL i,i,, Ditto . Bourdeaux, ditto ° 0' Frankfurton the. Main . . ,„ . t 5.54 .° lfe_ e ',.. Madrid •• .......... ........ ..... ..... ... 3 4 i ' Wlf . Cadiz. Bilboa .., • 341: * ',I Barcelona Seville Gibraltar „„ ...., 9O . 46 0 . -6 ,;') Leghorn ' :,/ - .- ~ , '' Genoa 4---Venice, Ital. Lis'. • 0 , Malta 45 —Naples.... ...... - , / . I W Palermo Lisbon ' Oporto 3a- • 1 Rio Jatici ro Dublin I Cork 9 per. Cent. taf a BULLION. 0 0 P I . Portugal Gold,.in Coin.. L• 0 .. 1 03 ~ • Foreign Gold . , in Bars :4 1 p a New Doubloons .... -. .. -•• • 4• 4 New Dollars 0 I o 4 Silver in Bars, Standard "' Till G Tier er,:ivi ERR at e . 4 Pe lay per vrel Ch Ps Obi of as ge Col ti t k.I Of •q C 4 tar