The Sun. — London, England, 1820-10-19 00:00:00

PARLIAMENT, MOUSE .OF LORDS-YESTERDAY. TH QUEtisPS DEFENCE. -~.~- '[Continuittion of resterdag's Proceedings.] The, Loan- CHIEF. JUSTICE of the Court of King's., Bench concluded as follows :--c' Suppos ing that, according to the, rule of Jaw, evidence of a conspiracy., _by suborned witnesses, to sup port any'proseCution,'on,ght not to be admitted, except such as applies to the prosecutor or the age;,..s einPloy ed by hinr—whether general-evi dence of such Conspiracy will hot, neverthekss, in the first instance, be received,as a preliminary step to-connect the" prosecutor hirnSelf,Jor ally . agent 'employ.ed, by hip), With 'the' Conspiracy and whether, by the same-yule, - evidence should not received from the defendant, he seeking to e•stablish in. proof - the, existence of a couipi racy to suborn eci;lenc azainst The . Judges understOod this to relate, in the •first'part, to the, admissibility otr „ geueral eV,idetice, impli cating a prosecutor or his_ - agent in a charge of ,entered into a conspiracy to suborn evi dette.; and, in'the whether it was open to a detendant to offt3r evidence for a sithilar pur pose. . - Vhderstantling . the 'question as• thuS 'di vithd, and conceiving it to allude, in the first instance, to. the subjeCt of guilty participation, he and_ his Learned Brothers agreed that it was often necessay t rb - adinit such general evidence. But at the same time it was important to observe, that . the general iatnre of the case was, in 'ordi nary practice, opened to the Court, and the con nection and rs-latiOris of itsdifferent parts in some degree explained. It might :-..ecothe the duty of a Judge to stop such general- evidence, if he thought it unimpoytant or takina 'an - irregular tendency. IVith regard to the 2dr branch of the 3d titiestion, they were of opinion that, evidence as to .sthornation was admissible, whenever it affected any person so as to lay him open'-td pro secution." The - ATTORNEY-GENERAL, from a wish 'to al low all . possible latitude to the A.ccused, gave the'point in dispnte, on an'understanding thathe shoOld at liberty to bring new - witnesses 'to rebut any eVidenCe which might now be, produc ed.=--'ll4 Efarl'of LIVERPOOL also expressed him self'desirous that the fulle'st inquiry should take plane into the acts Vimicarti and itigirnti , and the:Honse--having admitted their agency - as esta blished, ordered the examination of Pomarti to , " proceed: • - . , BONFIGLI 0 POMARTI examined by Mr. WILDE. All the previous questions and answers of the wittieSS"Were repeated until the short-hand wri ter 'came to they question to -which objection had been taken . . 7 Mr. WILDE then put the folloWing'questions'i-L- Q. You have stated -that TrmiCarti had told you to bring her' Royal Highness papers ;. did he offer you- any inducement to -bring those pa pers ?—A. ? . He told me that he - would - have' given, me 'an - employment, and that he would-have given me•more erpoltnnent than my employment. Did he state the nature of the employment thk he Would give you , ?—ln the Police of Milan. Did . you :afterwards posSess - yoUrself of anyof her nighness's paPers3 . and fake them to.- Tinkat-6 • The tiOLICUOtt-GENERAL objected to' mode of putting the .question: - • • - - 'l'he`Lojn Cit.iNCi:m.oa.—A4khim what he did. Mr. .WILDE.----Did you do any thing in conse- - quenee . of What. Vimicarti' said the - follow ing -day I•hrottglit him some. Did Vimiearti 'say any .thina as - .to the time you should go to his otlice ? 7 ,--.HI told rne , tolci in - the evening.. , Did he mention any time ?--After sunset.. Did: you, upon any other occasion, take any other - papers, of her - RoYal Highness's to Vinti - 7 carti,?—f - did. For how bong a period were you in the habit of 'taking the, papeis of .Cadazzi, ,her R0..1 Highness's Solicitor, to Vimicarti ? The SoLiciToa-0 ENER L submitted that this was a leading question. On how many occasions did you take papers from Cadaze; and carry them to Vimicarti----1 don't know--z—many times: jou do so frequently ?--No. About how many times ?---Seven or eight, 'times at the utmost. Did'Vinlicarti.know when you took' those pa pers that you' were a clerk in the offic4 of Cadaz . - • zi knew certainly. • , . . .133 ,- whose de:,ire or request - did you take then] ?---I don't knoW the-wan. Bad you .any consersation ;tli Virnicarti aboul your taking diem toltl me' to bring to Mai those . papers I could get. Did yoU rect,:a. , any thing from Vimicarti for tabirtg those' papers ?—;Money. How- often'did you receive mane y, from Via& carti for taking her Royal 7lighne.s 7 .s papers Six time.%' Were yonsatisfied . with the tporte:y that ,you got from Viinicarti-?-4. was not.—(La)ughter) Did you eqi . make any complaios to atiy one that you did not:get,money enough The , Sor.icyron-C-4:baniAL- again: 'interposed, and objected to this manner of shaping the ciues;. lion. •-' • • Ask 101 if .he did not•rnake:complaints to 'Co lonel'Brown that • Vlinicarti had not given money emintgli 'for taking her-, Royal Ifighne's papers , to hire complained once. What 'did Colonel' Brown „„say, to you upon making, these_ ?—R.e told me that he. _ _ was a friend of the ...kdlocate Vimicartig and that 1 ought not to.doubt that Virnicarti would pay me what he had, promised. 1)41 'gou, iti 'consequence of. this 'communica tion. with Col - Niel Brown, make any application to Vinticartijor money;—Coyne!. Brown told me to call agsin;tliq'following day on the Advo-• cafe Vitnicartb wb,c, .would give me something. Did you call Did you receive any more money ?—.l!did. 'Where did Vunic - a - rti liye ?—ne lives now in the Rue Gabello. Does he now live in the same street he did: when you first went ?—No, not in thi! saruV. street ; lie first lived in the street uga.;~Bella. It was in a lane. ; • Where did Colonel Brown live ?----Beyond the Bridge at the Eastern gate. • To-what subject did the papers relate which you tookrto Vimicarti ? The Sommott-GI•IERAL once more requested that the question might be put in a more definite manner. • Does the witness.know that the papers which he took to Vimic.arti related to the examinations at Wiilan ?----Some of them. State which of them he knew ?—One of them related to the deposition of the Fermne (le eh am b r e, who had been to Vienna with Sacchi— , (Witness was stopped in, his answer. by I .llr WILDE.) I tnerely Want to know , to what subject the pa pers related ?—They were' letters. _ Were there anrexaminations of witnesses ? 'Not , amongst the letters ; they Were letters o her- Royal llighnessy the. Baron Bergaini, and o others. Were there beside the letters any depositions or statements of evidence of witnesses ?-7-Yhere . . . was not. - . What other papers were there besides letters? .There were soole answers of the AdvOcate Ca daz.zi to Bergami. . "Answers to what ?----Answers of Cadazzi to Bergami. , Were there Sny other papers • Do you know to.what subject these letters're,, lated .'---Sorne of them.. . State ?-L-One of. them was from Bergami, who JIIr.IVILDE.—I only Ilant to know to wl subject they related, generally: To what subject did they relate''—One was of Bergami, who said that he would not. return to Milan till he saw that those who went before without shoes should not again be without them. Thq last question and answer, with the con currence of Air. DLNAI were struck out of the minutes. State the subject, and not the contents of the letters 'Advocate Vimacirti told me to bring those letters Which treated of the dep6- sitions---„that is, those letters which desired some body to come:and give evidence., Did he in point of fact carry any letters on that subject to Vimicarti ?—Letters, not papeis. bo you' know a man of the name of Riganti ? Riganti ever rnake any' application to you about papers - "?-=The has been at my _house, and did apply to me. • 'Had you any 'communication with Vimicarti reSpecting Riganti's' application for paperS?---; I had. .What did' Vimicarti say on the subject of Ri ganti's application for papers ?-1 sail I knew not - Itiganti, and I asked Vimicarti who he was ; 'and 'he told me' lie was a person of condition, and that I should• give him'any thing. What was the arflication that Riganti made to witness resperting papers . ?—He said, if I gave them to him-he would give him i‘ great deal of . money. - ' • What papers did you give to him ?- 7 -Papers respecting the affairs Of her Royal Highness: What'affairS of her Royal Higimess ?—Those now pending in England. • What object did they relate to ?--Ife told me nothing else. ' 4 Did Riganti know in whose einpld.yment you were ?—lle-knew fit, for he came to my hour. The Secretary of Cadarti came to look after me. Did Vimicarti`" Fay any thing' more abotit the employment 'of Riganti?—He told me" `trtat he was a person of character ; he told mei no thing else. t. Cross-examiired by the SOLICITOFt-GENERA Q. How late; w'ete - you . -in the service of Ca dazzi ?—A. year -and a half. Were you his Clerk at that time ?—Always. „Down to' the present time to the 27th of . July. • Then on the 27th of July Cadazzi turned you out of his service ? • `l►,•. WrriDE objected that this was assuming whaft the witness had not stated. frell, did he •tum you out'of his service ? Ili: did. - Have you ever been in his employment since ? —No. Do you mean to swear, that from the 9.7 th of July, down to-the present time, you have never been in the ernploy of Cadazzi can swear it a thousand times With whom did you come over here ?—Witl Count Vagsali. • - • • Were you alone,' -or was there auy body else ? —There was anotlli person. Who ?t , --A -certain Bassalo Majori. . Did yob enter the service of Count Vassali ?—No. Did• you not come over R s the servant of Count Vassal.; am not in the service of Count Vassali.- • • • • - I ask you, if .you did not come over in the aa tacter of servant., to Vassali ?—No ; he hid a servant. • -• .Did yon•ne*er represent yourself, on any oc casipn, as the servant of Vassali never. • .Did Count Vassali neve/ re.present you to, be his servant, in - your presence ?-;--Neyer. When was it that you first went to the Advo . caite, Vimicarti•?:—September of last year. t ;antyou tell . us the day pf • the month ?—I don't kn o w the day. ' l \'ll us about•the time ?-1' t was towards the end of th e month. • bid , you go to VimiCarti before ?—I Did -You go to Vimicarti of • yoar own accord, or what made you go to him ?—The employer with wliom I was before had some . money due . to. him. .1 ask whethe r you went of your own accord, or what induced you to go there ?—There was a po urged me twice to go, and . then he tookerso it i me himself i there. ` Did that person tell you what yoti Were to go to Vimicarti for ?--Ile told me that I ought to • go; because lie wanted to speak to me, and I shouldbe.rn4de a gentle Tan of if Iwent. Did': he tell you how yon Nitt. f it tool* made a gentlernanlle told .rise so ninli—no more -, to go, and he would_tikke me. y c _ • D-41 yon kolow at tliiktime tlyallkVirnicarti , vvai! employettiu the . pi . o?eli about her 111410tf.? , - When 1 went I knew it, Do you mean that you did ..not know so till you saw Vimicarti ?--I knew not. At the time you-saw the person, who asked you to go to Vimicarti'?—What At the time that person spoke to you did you know. that Vimitarti was employed in the pro .cess of her Royal igliness knew it, Was your master Cadazzi employed At that time for her Royal highness ?-L-He was not em ployed iii the affairs of her Royal highness in england, but in those of Italy.. . 'Did you know Cadazzi was in possession of papers of her Royal Highness had t them in :my own desk. Did you not, as an honest man, communicate this request to go to Vimicarti's, to . your mas ter ?--No. • 'Did you not conceive it your duty to do so ? I thought at the time 'that I could do no harm. •Do you mean to say that there was no harm ih delivering to Vimicarti, the letters, Tapers, and other documents you have mentioned ?--Docu merits I did not give ; 1 gave Letters. Well, that there was no harm in`handing over letters to V;micarti, without the consent of your master, Cadazzi ?—Yes, 1 thought. it would do no I/ann. • . Did you think it your duty to tell your Master that lie,might judge whether there was-no harm? I thought it was my duty, but I..neglected it. Now , pray tell us , who the person .-was _who • called upon you twice to go to Vimicarti ?—I don't know the person, if I did, I, would tell. Tell us where you met him the first time ?:—ln the - street of St. Victoire, near the Theatre. Did you meet him by accident ?-44.nccident ; I did not know him, nor do I know him; he stop ped 'me. Did you not ask him• his name, or who he was? —I did ask him, but he told 'me it was no' busi ness o'f miiie to know that. ' Where - was it you saw him the second time ? Wcimere I had met him - before: • - Did you meet him also by accident the second time ?:---Yes. IVas it at the same how' of time day as on the first occasion ?—Yes, I was coming. from the Office. Did he repeat the, same queskion he had asked you the first time ?—He asked me whether I had thought on what he had told me - the day before. What was your answer ?—That I had thought Upon it, but would not do it. Did you meet him a third time ?—No; I went to Vimicarti's. So, after tellipg him you would not go, you did go to Vimicarti's?---Yes. Did you ask his namelhe second time you saw him ?----I did ; but he would not tell me. Did. you go . alone;_or with Wm ?-4-le took me as far as Vimicarti's door. Have you ever seen him since ?—Yes, once ; but I could.not see him in theluce. Had you no curiosity to see b'is face ?—Yes. Did - you Follow him lo gratify that curiosity?— Yes. - `Where?—To the door of Vimicarti. Was he young or 01d..?-He was middle aged. Was he of a .light, or dark comp lexion ?—Dark, black: . Was he stout or how ?—A little stout. - How was he dressed ?-4 am not a painter to draw his picttire. I ask you in what ciothes he was dressed ?—I don't 'remember. He was in a coat, but I don't remember the colour of it. Has any body told you to be careful not to say Not mi ricordo ?—(A laugh.)—[ have heard it said about the town, and I a iked the meaning of, it. Has'not Count Vassali told you to be particu larly careful not to say Non. mi ricordo ?—No, has nobody told you ratl?et to say Non so,_ than Non mi ricordo know it by myself, without being- told by any body. Did ,Vimicarti pay, you any thing for the pa pers you delivered the first time gave me three double golden N apoleons, and told me th e y . .were for me to take a chocOlate. • 'When did you take the second papers ?—Af ter September. "HoW soon after 'you took the first papers did you take the second Three or four days. What did he-pay you for the second parcel you gave him'—Four single .1 - apoleons. Were you sent for ?—,No; I -went of my own accord. When did you carry the third parcel ?---In October. At w hat pars of October ?—I do not remem ber if it was the beginui'Ag, the middle, or the end. 1\ hen you took the third parcel, what did he pay' you ?—ile paid /up for them at' another time. When did you ca cry the fourth -parcel ?-4 caried a paper as far is the end of November. ' _ . . . . .But the fourth tiuip ?—i do not, reme:mber if it was in October or ) . ;vember. Did you carry many papers ?—Some Having carried paper 3 for so..lang a Feripd, and having been paid; by -Vimicitrti, did you ever communicate the ciricumstance to Cadazzi ?----/ never said any thing , to Cadazzi. - Do You mean to say, that: from the month of: September to July, (!adazzi never spoke to you about these papers Never. Did lie never miss ;my of these papers ?--No. Did he never . ask.;ror them ,on. any occasion I . --No. Were you a confidential clerk of Cadazzi ? You say these papers were in your custody 2.---Yes. Did you not think you acted a most villainous part in, taking thes,e mers ?—Not in the be ginning. how loug was it before this light broke in upon your uPderstanding ? • *Mr. DENM AN s u ggested, f or th e s a k e o f regu . . , The , - iarity,- that the question should trot - be pit. - , Learned Counsel had assumed, what did 1 10 t: e r p , pear to have been stated, that a light - had br ° in : upon. his understanding .---(A- laugh.) , , a nd ',. Q. When did yon discover that this conduct was b 35 !a,) ' infinoihs ?.--.A. About the beginning of this year. , --4A 1 .10 • W• ,t it A discovery of your own that yuur conduct cea rti a,e and it Snout, or were you told so by aopthel person . •••••!_ i . e . , ! are many 'olio actlaasela• and infaniiiast, and afterwar d ! "pettes, atirl to kareal.-(Liughter.),,, NI • ! Then hittir?g dishvered at ale commencement of th .e , ,Y o fl that your conduct was base and infamcns, did yoti 001 th at it your duty to discover to yOur waster ?—I -thought it r, , to be silent.—(A laugh:) e I now ask you whether you did not think that.theles t tbitts mea ty you could' do, as thelait of your repentance, was to • it to Cadazzi ?—I could nut foresee all these things. o U Now,- you told us itavas aboht the benning of the Yea. repented—when was it you carried Site last parcel to v' 0 , carti ?—I do not remember whether it . was the e nd of No e . her, or the beginning of December. t • ill' • Then did you carry no parcel after that time to Vinuct Before I swear I would wish to• think a little.—(A laug"'v y el In July, when I went to ask the name of a p e rson who c 3 , ho ' Upou me at my house,` he asked toe for a list of persons ".! came - infavour of-the Queen; and I gave hint the list; ! t hat Did you call on Vimicarti in July I—l e s ; t o tell 110 a person called. • t' Wai - it the same person you -met by accident in the 5 tfee 40 that called on you ?—.No; I don't know that person; he " called apon. me was iganti. .• . , . . . • Did you give up t h e papers at that time ?—I gave.hin'lll' list of the persons that were.going t se out. c Was this a list of the. witness s o on , , behalf of her P .°,al Higness ?—Not Mr h D . ENMAN a apprehen ll ded Olt as his Learned erlo,,ot 0 . was examining to the contents of a written.document , `,,, that document ought to be produc e d, i n p re f e r ence , to cb o. lug the memory of the witness. ! ~ The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said he had no more 111; tions to ask relative to th e cont e nt s o f t h ese pape rs; lb .. , was ther e fore oo necessity furprodifeing them. Ca' . .SOLICITOR"-GENER. - Cl--- . 42. awn you did not tel dazzi that you had given ibis list ?•—A. 1 did nut aril hitn' p i I Then after you re rented you Wive this list, in the wool? if Jitty•-?aaftrey Were five - Or six,"rwrote to them. I gave th e names mvseff. . . Did, Vithicarti pay !;aitt f; , r that intelligence ?—No. 1 ' 511 ,,t his this list, to find out who was the pe,, soa wh• cane''' . - o cane''' . my house. Did Riganti pay you ?.--4 gave this list to Vimicarti. r te? 'How long after you had 'given' this' list Aid 'our ma ' know of it ?—On the same day - that 1-told h to liii.Ativt'c - , ' Cadazzi I give this list to ViMicarti. , ;! 60 . , Now, with the exception bf the list, did you give ,an!!"' pets to - Vimicarti after December. 1819 ?.-1 . ,0. • ~ - . Will he swear this ?—I will swear it a thousand time•••, k ;,.. •'! Did he offer any hopes to Vimicatti after - that time ?-- - L.`; • Yheti was it that Alinocarti gaee hnt i Ilia-money ?-- 11. 1 1 ; the card of March in this-year, when Col. Brown -scorfor ; How long before ,was it wh e n you r ece i ve d a ny - Irt)°, , from Vinicarti ?- 7 -in the .end of November. . - - ' t o , , ! So I ant to understand that froin the.end, of Novembee7,,,,, the end of March, you received, no unntry from Viiniciat i • • Nothing. Will be swear that ?—I would swear it a thousand lidte7 o f ' What sum did he'last receive from liimicarti at the en d ° f . • March ?—Fifty-two hives and- a .half of Milan,. You are quite sure that it was in 1 lo• eird'of March ?- 1 :. ° :, , Hare you never stated that you rec e ived mone y from Vo';.• carti for papep.io this year ?—No; I never took any. bat et I ask hint:whher he ever! stated that he did e—t ba . never stated so. , . • stated that , . Will you swear that you never did ?—I will. . i Asichlurtnetlier he ever caPrlTii — Colonel Brown, wilt , r f bundle of papers ?—I had two or three letters, to make t i '!' e known . .., , . • • :When you called on Colonel Brown, did you not ask 1 ,1 °1... hi m was one of. the Milan Com issiooers, appointed to inatill'if e t ! into . the conduct of her Royal Highness?—t knew that' wits one of them. i,--1 I ask, did lie introduce himself by ''asking the quistion. - . called on hint and took out those letters. wat I ask bito, , when-he delivered those l e tters t o C o l. Bro ii , did. he not ask that G e ntl e man wh e th e t! he was one of . i . ., •Cointaiiiioners to.iriqUire into the conduct of her Royal Vq:;, ness!?-1 showed him those letters Sr.' make 'myself 10 , "' l and itiade'a complaint against Viinicarti,'who had seduced we e andpaid me so tittle. ' - I ask him - again-, did he not - ask Colonel Brown if he % ,` -' , ' r one of the Commissioners to iniptiae into. the 'conduct o' 4 ' Royal Highness ?—I did so, - but'l knew Slat he-was one., 1 • Did not Colonel Brown •ask you who sant were ?- I "'' ' ,, e ~n , l 2 Y l s S , a e s l a k f i l : ld t n i ri E i s i v s i l b i l ,e , y i t ! t i l i i a i e e Y r s i s t n ‘l r l e i l l f : t l l 6 .l s . e l i l :c. A.B re t " i sn v f it i d t c l in i t t i n i t o l t el a r s i k k! l ( t i t t nt n 4: , -1 , 11 i! to • AO 'so, whether C° 1 " 1 ; a . .Brown did not shut the dot - ir; and said he wirold not let b ird leave the house until Ise told birn.who he was ?-1 swear i t '- not tier: 1 ask him whether-he did not tell him that he is-as a 0 ' 4. : dential clerk of Cadazzi, and that Colonel Brown said lie ~ c'i ; a most infanmas scoundrel, and that be Would end in lg ° hanged ?—l never said so. • • - • - bat 'flint is :nu-answer'. The question is not what you, what COlnnel Brown said. - v e Question repeated,?-4 repeat again. it is not trite he r al ~,, rti, the, letters; and Colonel Brown shut the door of the ro.'"t... arid told me not •to speak sti , loud, fur we sto l id,' be he , ' l l ,l :arid he told toe to call next day - on Vinticarti, - and he *.v" . ., ctfuse me to receive 9.00 francs ; and lie told me nothing e' t o but that : Vimicarti-was a• person of condition, -and he se ° ' keep •Itis• promise. -.- ' , . .. .• . • ' • ! • tda - Did he-not, when he shut the door, tell you that you sh°, lo not gtrout till yoa told him who you were-?—He is it liar i f. , • sayaso•-••••(Latiglting.) ; n o' Dial not Colonel Brown -say that you were a most infan? p a fellow fit - that-meeiing ?—I hare repeatedly made answe r did - riot say sot Of Did lie• Say you would end by being hanged ?—He ne , said so, I swear. • abf Any thing to that effect I—Nit; for I liave been seduce ilwm, and they are more infamous than I. Ited Did ;you call on Colonel Brown more than once ?—l a c -tire, first time in the morning, be wad not at ho me; 1 -o '. - after dinner, and saw him. „ • Did you sere him mote than once?..--Many times at Zia"' • 'At his own house ?—Only once at his own house. When was that ?—ln March, 1820. ' ' „of Whatwere the papers.you carried to Vitnicarti ?—'s , e - three letters. .. . te ll When you called the .first time on! Vimicarti, did yo", s r vhoyou , were e knew me. r lci Did,not Vimicarti ask . you , who you were, and did Y°' 0 r. -fuse to tell him?—lie did not ask me, for he knew we ‘O7 he saw me, because a person tool; me to his door. Did you not refuse to tell Vimicarti who you were, I •, you ?—No, 1.1,141-not. - - • Did you nut then live in. the Terrace Porto Tozo?- -S then. . Where slid you live at Milan ?-011 the Terrace Contrao Larva. . Is that the place where Lazatto lived ?—No. Did you ',ever live with Lazat to ?—Yes, I live now with 11.1 When did you first live with hint ?—Since the 49t il September, last year. Have you lived there ever since?—Yes. th y ' Do 'you consider .it infamous to say upon your oat-' o t which is hntrue I •Ynti have already stated that for three months you did not consider it infamous to betray "• co M nfidence of your ast:cr.? r. DPNKAN obje m cteil to this question. The stateme,oy!: the question was not what the wttne.s ste tea..lt Learned Friend's conclusion frnm.the statement. td s - The LORI) CIiA:•CELLOR said, that the very should be ineorporat, d itttile question, and not any arguiu tative conclusion frot, i th e m. .) O r a The SOLICITOR. will alter the questi° o .4 . 1-Itiviroz . said that ;at the Itegilining of the year yo' , , 1 0- ,113cov,reci that yore conduct in betraying. your nlaste S dent, ill fa ; I ask curt if yon think it ittir speak 'on Four ty.t ii t hat which Is untrue?—To swear the is just ; what is.' true i s'atear,and - w 1 ,41 I have saitl'l ant rca to.swear. Did you ropmen.cate these fact; to your rd',ster of own accord ?;—Yes. wiren .?—f 271 b of July. . Do you nwan to swear thot he dismissed ~ au j o wly onemtnnoit'.eatior thesef.cts to biro With wlyom haver yon lived since ?—I anVin t ra de. , What !ride ?-1 boy and sell woollen ctp tits for dresses' Did you - ever carry on that business hefore ?—Yes. . • Will yutt• swear•vou have no expect tion of re turnil i be the servil e of your farmer master whee. this business 51° over ?—;T es ; I will. Who I , rought yon over here ?—Vrissali. What are you to - have for this ?—I shall receive nu t I come ,bere to remedy my error, Coy mi,cominct. ' You swear that you expect no pompensat ion '—:S 7(), ha d O c. . Then you were very thiserahld at the mischief you casionvd ? (No answer.) • i 1111 w re • %VOA you swear that you have-had no promise to '-;,: , i ;;• tv:ll swear .no person bias pionnsed me atnY " ) - . 0 0 And that you came here entirely and only .to pottod9 errors ?—''es.—And for no ni,iter reason?--No citb:r kft tr th trte bill (1 ' e. _ v As Y '01, 4 It , F ait; rp epit, The, the rE Q. I 4. , 0 .1 ; •„ rii, _r id , I "