The Sun. — London, England, 1820-07-12 00:00:00

PARLIAMENT, HOUSE OF LORDS, JULY 11. The House proceeded in Pellew's Divorce Bill. Mr. Gaselee, and another Gentleman Appeared sas . Counsel for . ;the Petitioner ; and . Mr. Casherd on -the . Other side. Witnesses were . examined; And.. Mr. Casherd having stated; at he_ only - op-' posed a clause in the Bill for histardizing child ren, which the Lord Chancellor stated would -come regularly in this-stage of thE Committee, the Bill was read a second titneand committed 'for to-morrow. The Paper Duties -Bill and •otliers Ivere brought lip from the, House of Commons by Mr. Brogden, 'Sir James Graham and other Members, and 'read first tinie. • .• The King's Bench Proceedings - Bill, and others pri , read a third time and. passed. The Marquess of LANDOWN presented a Pe litior, signed by the Boroughreeve, and upwards of 2,000 traders, &c. of Manchester, praying the House to take into considrsration the India and the China Trade, with a view to the relief of the distresses of the inhabitants of Manchester.— Read and ordered to lie upon the Table. TI BER 'fRAI)E. The Marquess of LINSDiivIN wished to know whether it was intended by his Majesty's' Minis= tors to take any'step before the'prorogation, or railier, as understood; _the adjournment, with regard to the Timber Trade ? It was the opinion 6ffite Committee, froth which, _as Chairman, •lie had a few days since delivered a Report, that Borne measure should be adopted for the purpose of lessening-the Duties ,upon Timber imported fromtheßaltic, or of raising those upon the Tim- ber imported `from Canada ; so that, for the pre. gent, the , advantage of the value Of freight and transport should be given to the Canada Mer chant to place'hirri on a footing with the merchant trading to theßaltic. The . Earl of LIVERPOOL ' said, that nothing could be -lone - till next Session, as' the House of comm Ons Committee on Trade had not yet con sidered this branch of= the subject. He agreed that something should be done in behalf of the Baltic Trade-; but aS. encouragement had been given to the Timber Trade with Canada, at a time when, there-was a - danger of our wanting some most -essential articles, he thought that what was proposed Was perfectly just, that - the Canada Merchants-should have' the advantage of .thi-! . value of freight and tranqort ; he wished ) hoWeV'er, tO leave open the consideration, whether a gradual reduction of the duties on Baltic Tim ber 'might, not better effect the purpose in view. Lord ELLEI4BOROII6II. protested against any permanent tystettt which'should artificially plaCe the' trade with a...distant:and a nearenqUarter of the world upon the same- footing. He thought, however,"that as nothing could • be- done till the next Session, Ministers might; in the mean time, male the question- a mattef:of negociation , - with the Northern VOwerS:, particularly. the-Siive.reign of:Sweden and Norway,. with the view of obtain , some equivalent fel. the adviMiage whiCh 'wool([ he given to them . by -ourplacing the Tim ber Trade with that . quarter upon the same- foot tng with that to. Canada: - The Earl of LAUDERDALE objected to this 'course, contending; that-if we waited for other powers no advantageous step with regard to trade could be' taken ; but: on the other - hand, those powers would soon understand their own interest, If they found that 'their - commodities could only be taken- by being paid' for with our manufac tures. Lord ELLENBOII OUGH said, he did not mean that any measure to be' adopted here should de pend upon the conduct of Foreign -Powers,, but that. in the interval bkween this and the next Session some effort should be made to negociate. His Lordship-asked a question respecting-duties imposed at Ceylon upon the importation of' Bri tish manufactures, which amounted nearly to a prohibition. The Earl BATHURST observed, that when the advantages alluded to were girieti to the Canada trade upon grounds of pUblic expediency, it was distinctly understood that those . advantages should not be permanent. When, however;as at the present moment, 700 ships were employed in - that trade, -.navigated by 8,000 seamen, it would undoubtedly be highly inexpedient to re- Kurt on a sudden to any measure. which should , tend to tbroiv theta out of employment. The Ceylon ' duties alluded' to by the Noble Lord Were under consideration. • The Marquess of LANSDOWN objected to any permanent system of placing trade with a distant and a nearer quarter of the world upon an equal footing, and thought a gradual reduction of du ties as impolitic, as it would tend to glut the market by a forced trade, before the measure was to take place. Ile however agreed, that under the circumstances, the advantage of the value of freight and transport should be given to the Canada merehant. PETITION FROM THE QUEEN• Lord AICKI IND said he Petition to pre sent to' their Lordships. It was on the part of her Majesty. Tie would move that it be now read, Nviil a view to postponing its consideration till Friday, when a motion from a Noble and Learned Lord, relative to the subject and prayer of the - 1 3 44km' ~.stood upon order. The Petition was then :read by the "Clerk., and appeared as follows :-- • " CAROLINE REGINA, • '"To the Lords .Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament as- sernbled. "-The QueetThaving,receired information that the House hods .Itare.appoirited the second reading of a Bill for the . • — •.fgractatim and:..Divoree of h.er• Majesty fur 'Thursday, the 3;th August next, and as it is necessary and expedient for her defence, lhatshcslionld be furnished with a list of the • — WiTlA;74se4' to he :produced against her, the 'Queen desires • int list may ireT - forthwith.ldefirt red to, tier Majesty's Attor- uep , Gracral." ' The Earl of LA:LiDERDALE suggested, that if a Comulitt(!e to search for precedents, as was men- I %! tioned On a former evening, should be aeerned advisable, it would be proper their inquiries should be directed not to the particuPir point in question. merely, but should include the whole of the proceedings, with a view principally of rendering the matter clear,'and to show it to the public that-they had proceeded 'with the utmost deliberation and caution with respect to the inlit .portant procedure in queStion: - The Earl of LIVERPOOL mid, he had' no objec tion to the appointment of a=Comniiftee; but as it would be essential to have a report respecting any precedents for the. communication of a list of witnesses before Friday, when -the question was to be discussed, he thought it desirable that the Committee should be confined to that point, at least, in the first instance, and then they might consider the means of enforcing attendance. . Lord IIoTAAND objected to the appointment of a Committeee upon such' terms ; it was in reality nothing to the purpose . to report upon the mere point of communicating or dot a list of wit nesses, unless _they had before them the nature and description of the precedents referred to ; such - a rep,9 , rt, he could easily anticipate, might be in some respects deeply humiliating to the House, but it was most essential to .a correct view of the question, that the precedents them selves should be reported, in order that the House, might be enabled to- judge of what weight was dt4 to-them: After all, however, a search for—precedents could have •. little - or no bearing upon the present case. Bills of Pakns and Pe nalties being, if he might use the expression, a sort of criminal equity, in which the forms and usages of Parliament wete in a great degree set aside ; and, therefore, every case of that descrip tion would. be consiclered_with.regard to its own bearings, and with little reference to any other case of a similat tendency. lie contended, there-, fore, that they ought to look to the substantial justice of the case. The Earl of LIN - unroof, urged the extreme inconvenience of such an extensive. inquiry, and its uselessness as to the point irnmediately under inquiry,- respecting which the only good _that could be derived would be, if a Committee was tliought- necessary, a Report without delay. . 'Pie Earl of Ijsuo - nan-,11,n ,warded his : motion for a ,search into preedents of Bills of ; Attainder and Bills of Pains and Penalties, with re : spect to the communication to the accused of a list of. witnesses. The Earl BATHURST. moved to insert in the motion of Impeachment" as the case would be .still stronger, if it should be found that in cases of impeachment, as well as the-others; , as, in fact, hi all the judicial proceedings of the House, there was no instance of the communication to the accused of .alist of witnesses., Lord. HOLLAND opposed the amendment, upon .the same principle that he objected to the origi nal motion. The Report might probably be, that there were no , instances of. the communica tion of a list of witnesses ; but still this would make no difference with a view to the considera tion of the present case. In all cases of the description alluded to, the House would. s be guided by the. peculiar circumstances of each case ; and whatever precedents there were, they could'only be taken with reference to all the circumstances. that accompanied each of them, and in each were' different. . Thus, therefore, he came to the tune point—that the House ought to be guided' by the substantial justice of the case, which in his opi nion, under all the circumstances (without mean ing now to anticipate the' debate of Friday,) in the present instance, led, irresistibly to the con clusion, that . a list of witnesses ought to be com municated to the Queen. The Earl of LAUDERDALE observed, Mat what 7 ever might be the Report of the Committee, it would still be open to the Muse to adopt what ever course, in the present case, their:Lordships might deem expedient; but it would be satisfac tory to know what course had Veen adopted by the House upon former occasions, .. • Lord AUCKLAzip thought the,, motion useless, as to any view to their proceeding in the present instance, in which they ought solely to be guided by the substantial justice of the case. , Their Lordships , then divided on the amend ment as follows ; • Contelitsc is---Non-Contents, 10—Majority, 8. _ . .. After which the original motion was. agreed to, and. the - House adjourned. . ' • , HOUSE OF COMMONS. GRANTHAM ELECTION. Colonel ' . V . ODEILOUSE, , from . the. Grantham Election.Commi.ttee, reported that the Election as far as it' concerned the return of James Hughes, Esq..was void ; and that neither the Pe tition nor. the opposition ,to the Petition was fri volous or vexatious. Colonel WODEHOUSE also brought up a Special Report to the House, that James Hughes, Esq. - liad, during the last Election for Grantliam,'comnritted-sundry arrs.of treating, in violation of the Act of 7 Will. 3, chap. 4; and that he was therefore incapable from sitting in Varliament on the said . Election. That it appeared to the Committee, that a practice had ex isted, during' several tlectinns for the Borongh of Grantham, of paying sums of money to out voters, under fke colour of indemnifying them for loss of time; that the,said practice was illegal, subversive of the freetlom of election, and tending.to the most dangerous corruption. Doctor PIIILLIMORE gave notice, that he would to morrow• submit a motion founded on theßeport_Of the Com mittee. LAWS OF CANADA!, - . , • Sir .1. MACINTOSH presented a Petition 'froth' Rob'ert Gotalay, a Scotch Gentleman, who had gone oat 'to , it , ttle Canada. In Canada, it appeared, that a Law was in mist cure which went rather farther than our Alien hill, p~.it nit ablest the Government to banes)) any offensive --indivoluhl , ; Whether be was a natural-born subject or -alt enenty,land•tpis very measure was had recourse to against those against -tv-lyit this Law was put in force. :Phis Gentleman :-stated his cha racter to hare been misunderstood, and his - actions calurotil ated, and in consequence he -was•broughtbefore the Supreme- Coort of the Colony, - and seat out of the country. Gourlay alio complained of certain provisions' in the Law_or Canada which effected landed and Other property oppressive manner. He (Sir J. Macintosh), did not pledgu himself to submit a motion to the House in - another Session of ParliaMent, or at amither - petiOd of the present Session, on`• 'this subject; but it was eery probable that • be . should call their attention to the regulations alluded to - , Which be-under stood to he. most injurious intheir effects. • • -The Petition`was ordered to be printed. ' Sir J. MACINTOSH moved that the Petition presented from H. Dorrell, on a forayer : day,- should he printed: He did not pledge himself to wake a. isiotion.on the subject, but Ire thought the intlla Board ought to tang the case into con. Sideration. ...Lord BINNING stated the case to have received the. most 'serious consideration. Tlre Petition was' ordered to Irt printed. jkl SREPRES ENTATION. Mr..BENNET . said he bad to correct a misrepresentation which affected himself, and which had appeared in a paper otherwise very respectable, 7.7ie Morming Chronicle.- He was surprised this morning to fit 1 a long speech attributed to his Honourlble Friend the fsletnlieNlir Cork (who had only ut tered Rya or three sentences; and not one'word - of what was attributed to him), on the OplithAlmic Institution. It was stated in ihat speech, that he (Mr. Bennet), had declared that the statement which he had. made on a farmer occasion was ertuneons. He should not have alloWed his Honourable Friend to hate made any such statement without correcting him. He had never retracted any statement respecting Sir W. Adams's plan of treatment, because lie had never given any opinion on a matter of which he was an incompetent judge. He had merely stated on a former occasion what was perfectly correct, that there was a difference between Medi cal Authorities 113 to Sir W. Adams's .plan. He had stated yesterday, that be had visited the Ophthalmic Institution ; that he had seen '69 patients, that of 'these three only com plained, and t hat he was induced to think, by the explanation of the Surgeon of the Institution, an intelligent young man, that their complaints were erroneous. Mr. BENNE moved for an Account of' the - Number of Persons confined in the Fleet for• contempt under Exchequer. Process. BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. Mr. R. MARTIN said, he had on a former occasion men tioned to the House, what appeared to him to he a wilful misrepresentation of what he had. said, in The Morning Herald.-,-He had at that time expressed a hope, that the per son who reported for that Paper, would not trouble himself to report what he (Mr. M.)- said in future, and that if he did, he would do it correctly. He had applied to the person who had thu - s misrepresented him, who told him in a super cilious way, he was ready to give him any satisfaction that a gentleman could demand. He (Mr. M.) had declined this trial by battle, whoreupon this person said, " vou shall have no cause for complaint in future, tor we shah never report any thing you say.". He was sorry this determination had beensleparted from, for in The Morning. Herald. of - that day, he saw sentinients attributed to hint 'which could only come fermi the inliabitant of 'an asylum for idiots." The account -given of this speech was. this Mr. Martin - (of Galway) compared -the Opposition Gentlemen who were attaching the Ministers frir the purpsse of getting into their places, to a hackney coachman Whom he once met in Paris, 'who ipuke- in the roost disrespectful . terms cpf the King of Francearid said he himself would make a better King if put in his nlace."—lle moved, that.). Rotreson and T. I'. Glass log-ton, the printer and publisher of The Morning Herald, do attend the House on Friday.—Ordered. . . The Irish FisherieS, the Naval Prize-Money, the Royal Family, and the Irish Excise Licences Bills, were severally read .a third time and-passed. . . MUTINY OF coNwars... Mr. BENNET presented a Petition from John Drake, the Commander of a trafiSport for the conveyance of Convicts to New South-Withis. The-ease of the Petitioner was thiS:— In the course of the voyage tf4 - nntinyarose in - the ship, in conseqtience of which the guard flied on the convicts, 11 or 12 nt-whom died in consequence. When he arrived at 'New .South•SVales, he had been treated,igilobtinionsly by the Go vernor. His conduct had been inquired into by a Commis sion; eiinsisTit4 'the" *P6liCe - Magistrate, the Judge 4dro .cate ,414 - td Ibe Gov-ernor's•Secretary.- Though the Commission tipci4c4lfit tirere..w:trs no ground for proceedings, thelGover ita7s,Secielary having. clissented from their decision, and - Ifiltin4 haerhe ea:rof the'Governor, Captain Drake was sent himie. tit. take hi& trial,-with three convicts, Who received 'a freepitidvtoxive evldrnee_against him (one of whom had .since &en flanged,, and two transported for new crimes.) — On the triallt w,is declared by the Judge that there was not a scintilla of. evidenee in , stippOrt of tile prosecution. Cap tain Drake had, by these proceedings, .been put to an ex• pense of 7061, for which he ba'd only•received 201. compe nsation front the Government,' belt'. what he especially'com- Idained of-was, , that he had 'been refused the sum which was allowed for taking out the convicts safe, to obtain which, it was necessary t 0 have certificates from the Surgeon, the Trans ,port Board, and the Governor. The Certificates of the two former he had, hot Governor Macquarrie refused his. He moyed'that the Petition be brought up. - Mr. C. W.' W.YNNE.doubted whether the House was com petent to receive this Petition, as it prayed for pecuniary re lief wit bont_ttferecuinmend‘tion of Government. Mr. BENNET l', referrin:- to the • prayer of the PetiiiOn, 'showed,_that though it complained bitterly of the conduct of dovernor M'Ciitarrie for withholding the tiittal certiSiate, it imputed no - Name - Tv the Government at home: Mr. G'OULB URN contended, that tinder the circumstances of the case, Governor Macttuartie itml no discretion, but was obliged to send home Captain DrAe Trial. ` As to the sum paid when prisoners Were safely landed in New South Wales, it was.evident: that, tite question, whether this SUM should be paid, was very different from that, whether-Captain Drake had been guilty of Murder.' Mr. BENNETT reminded - the House, that the judge had thought it unnecessary to go into the defeAce,coActiviug that there was not a tittle of en idence against them. The SPEAKER said, - the . Petition in paint' of form could he received, if the prayer was founded on the refusal of the Governor- to_giv_e_ the. customary certificate; if it rested ost other grournls might be liable.to.objection. e.ks rtkitE Am! • thought if thertl was a doubt 'on the -: subject, that &Alit:ought tube. given in faiour of the Petitioner, Mi C.*. said, this siticss . scented. to him a better subject for a pi itSte action, than , for an appeal to that House. lt was a tremendous -hardship fur GovernorNae quarrie, that these charges should be salt forth to the world so long before it was possible to give an an s wer to them. He doubted under the ei-icuralstances whether the House ought to receive the Petition.. • Lord CASTLEREAGH, though disposed in a doubtful case to favour the petitioner, could not but concur in 'what had just fallen from tbe -Honourable Gentlema►i, and thought; perhaps, after wliathaitinst_ -been urged, the Gent man (Mr. Bennett) would dot press the petitionon the House at present. • Mr. BENNETT periisted in bringing : 4;oe pitition,which was read, and .orderad to lie on-the table. ' PIM"! LEGE.. . . , Dr. PHILLI MORE, presented a petithrtilrortriervis Arm strong, now. in Newgate, fur a breaeli ofrAnitil4p.t, praying to be released.--Ordered to lie on the table. Dr. PHILLIMORE moved that the petitioner shouldlc brought up to-morrow, in orderiojris being dischaiged. Mr. BANK§.liad doubts whether th,,pglition .was pro perly wOrded. Dr,.,I)RILLIMORE stated.il„tob wotled.in .theltipst -re spectful manlier: 1 . ...•, s • After 4*few ffirtbe - r fioni Mi. Banker - and 4r. C. W. Wynne,the-motiob was agreed to: - THE QUEEMS,OUNSEL. Mr. BnouonAm begged leave".t6 call the atten tion of . the House ;to it=Subjent.-41 some importance, as it regarded the proceedings .cif- Parliament, and 'the individual convenience of some of its Mem bers., It ..was - known. to the ; House, that two cases existed Members ' of that House were by -law. prevented - from attending as 'Counsel at :the bar of the House 'of Lords: , The first re ferred to writs of error.; all. questions of Common ,Law; There- wasanother-case in Which they were-net.legally .petinitted to appear, and that was, Wliere;Bills'4vere.hronght under their tordshipS' 'consideratiiiii.'• This rule, however, had not been ;strictly:-!acte&upon , for - more than a century, not,:- he --believed, since. the year. 1710, from which period. Members of : that House . had -been allowed to attend the,har of the House of Lords as Cointsei ilf- - Caiesj-of Common , Law. 1 hey :- h4 not; hOwever, 'l3•Weii'dilowed to attend as CounSel - against Bills,- aiiithe did not mean to deny, that such a• - regulation `was, - -produCtive of triucl(ConVenienee . in the,peoceedings'''Of the legis lature.-.:-There was, .However, la `case now pend ing, which was - of so* - petuliarry 'important a na= tine, that it ought' . to - un ext , hiptiOn - to this ordinary , and -- - - Vqy'.‘ H pro Per- rule: 7 e - should, therefore,, propoSe.that'the two •Law Officers of her Majesty be excepte r k, - . and thit they-be - allow- ed . 1.6 bp herd at the bar - pf ; tW4lbuser of Lords against thc; ... till-relative .Majesty: :No thing could. be more fair or: equitable than such an exception ; as her Majesty having no house h hold, and there being a question implied • t oes Bill, whether she ever should have any, 1 r d i' s . officer to represent 143 r in the House of -1-°l'o," who might act for her in somewhat a similar 1.0, pacity to that of a nominee at‘an ElectioA. rnittee. Should that. Bill come dOWO, f°, kkottse, which he could not .possibly anticiPsclo lshoul qlso,. propose. tINt her. Majesty's tthe Law Officers bexxcepted froin voting 011 0 , question. The Hon. Member Was about to_ Pr pose a motion on the subject;- when the Lora CASTLEREAGH rose and-suggested e pediency of a previous notice, as the subject l, of so important a nature as to require some ae. beration. It was not improbable that a disc osst° might arise upon it. - 11 Mr. BhouGilAm thought the motion' would been•aeced.ed , to 'as a matter of course. frer• - iz ' jesty's Counsel had been twice heard at the '" of the House of Lords without any objec tic having been taken, and could the Noble . 11 1 possibly' think of urging one in this instance however, the Noble Lord should persist in doing so, was he aware of the consequenCes ? Wa s fo t aivare,. that he would establish a precedent , excluding all Members of the House froM be ti e l e heard at the Bar of the House of Lords in c i ` s l a of appeal ? 'Assuredly, if the Noble Lord sboalp refuse to acquiesce in his motion, he (A Aer Brougham). would move the Standing- O f '„ s t against the hearing Counsel- at their Lordsh`r Bar in cases of Writs of Error. = Mr. Wy NN cited "two Orders made by Parl,lre ment on the subject, the one. in 1666 x, and tlO -other in, 1669. The first, in the opinion of Hon. Member; was -strictly prohibitory, ba t n 'o' the second there appeared a sufficient sauctl' for the motion. proposed. • ° .atr. BROUGHAM said he should give no., ,/ a motion on the 'subject for to-Morrow "(this d a ? „ Lord CASTLEREAGH would give no o,r io it upon it whatever, he was only anxious, that' ‘hould not be hastily urged on, as it was lii ; to create dischs - sion. et Mr. WYNN had taken it for granted that Majesty's Law Officers would have propdsed measure as a- matter to be expected from the ° ar e tare of the proceedings in which they i f ' engaged. Sir FhANcis Biptninr thought, in orae r i . i .,/ avoid inconsistency, that a similar procee ui ';, would be necessary in the case of the Attorl' e ' c u General, who was to attend the House of M c f , on the part of the King.---Notice for to-morro' - 'EDUCATION.' t te Mr. BROUGHAM brought in a.Bill for the ,educating of the Poor. He lamented the fee b %l . that had been 'manifested by. certain .metnber g li o 4 , the Roman Catholic and Dissenting, bodies. .t r , 'House would, hardly believe that they,had ut;:d stood, from his.oonnecting it with the Establino ; Church, that it was, the object of. the measur e o f compel parents to send their children to dO tr e j 'the last remains of _religious liberty. He: sil ° , 4r i t o ,this language_ to be little warranted' "'"ji• , cumstances of the, country, and utterly ila h r to cable to his . Bill. It was his anxious sci s 'io meet the wishes of those of • the most respec t Lit' : bodies to which he had alluded,, and he i hc b' ,therefore struck out the:sacramental test, "'", he had at first made a part •of the Bill.' -they T would.-receive this as a voucher for hi tire{ cer 4 y when he declared that nothing was fli; ije from than to do.any.thiug that CO considered hoftile to Religious liberty. tors Mr. W.SMITH Said, the Protestant Disse n of were in ,some degree alarmed by the provisiq' :the 8111 . but riot to the same extent as the Catholics had been. There were some cl at1 .;;; which - he Wished to see modified in the pr°g' of the Bill. A 0 14 . The-Bill Was then read a first trine al l " . dered to be read a second time to-morrow. NEW BARRACKS. the Mr. CALCRAFT' called the attention 0 • 0-P 'House to a subject of' some importance, peared. froth - the - conversation' of 'the. prCte.'7,i,ot night, that the Right Hon. Gentleman diet know that the building of the New Barracks oe c9rnipenced: He (Mr. Caleraft) knew t hat k ler' wall of the stable had been -carried to a con A l' able height, and that 11 °" small expense , a ce ,ready been incurred. As that House wa s posed to hold the purse strings of the coLuitid it was right that, they should know Wh o 0 10, :authorised the beginning of this w o r k, whie l, i ; 00 :to costthe country 70,0001. before it had r ece 'o • the sanction of any vote of that House. I he ' v erf, :pense of the- Barrack Department had, in ° -, l o' -few' years; been increased to the enormous `l - 03r 1 8,000,0001. ; and it now appeared that th e • rack Board had authorized this Work to be. Ci.lo without even the - . sanction of the 'Board, a pre ,head of which the Right Hon. 'Gentleina-', - 0 0 sided. He concluded by moving, that tile OPT of the Barrack Department should .a,ttetw House to`-morrow.. a •of the EXCHEQUEIrsa I :9. 0,1 the Contractor knew that the whole:bUsi 9e :4 o ; . subject to the - revision and control of l'arliara" He hatteo"douht that the Barrack Bo a Set?. acted regularly .and cautiously. The goo• her had perhaps bettei• give a 'notice. i : pe ar. l6 Mr. CALCRAFI' thought the question •)-- e f o re i i . now ten times more - irriportantithan lie • wished to know if - the...Rai:l*k: 0- ° 6 , l : r e t h o Ti 4 submitted an estimate, to the astigy first brick was -He ,had. -no objelloale postpone his.moilo . nbcgt - t.iyeii . .llP7liqrie_d;f l6. o oll. cellor of theE r- xcheque would -not in Oe time proceedWith:-thisc BLIP. . 4 91 1 ° ,After a. few Words frOrn. iItEV CrrArleoor to , the EXCHEQUER the notice was fixe d morrow. - '.•-• ' to • . FIR .N 1 ANAS.. 4H LOPEZ.- dareN a • Lord J. RU"SSELL rose to move an ii- l tdt 0 the CrOwntii:ghOttenliFiasiiiiisine-nt 01 id th e fe nassehLopei:.44.by - e 9. for the sentence wlricl-: had 1 off . I" 6 O c he thought it their.bennderi'd a n t , with severity-, but thititlru4;-Ni;h6130:(! ci.„.66431 means' of 'getting ca-1 le might now;,-withwtifOiriPtY,'!'StifiL I trt that justice, in thiss--particular case, imp r c aul' • pended, and that mercy might tabo 1~~ Y, t-" tl 13 til P e