The Sun. — London, England, 1820-10-10 00:00:00

; - • LA, ()- 611111,,,, .1!(i ;;;-1 \ \ Ae EA P ' ; 1 4014.. "4 / • • 04401 , 1 i, & 1 1-ZA tl ir " tO' fit' `‘\'‘ on behil the el‘ al a MAIS art 1., he Shore and a ' s tgifi to liv e LEG° e Mere! she sts or 10'1 bo areci that be, whil e [e ther e tY, tp [ice to GUILD day s I.4JES' Qtls D'S. of tt' : nero. 00' 3y j ht e too sur , tit ich ir e N: 4 ,1 4 " hip' ' r ot. that tv lyolou' e •urP°l autOSV' 9 , la •iht, 111 , v - liar ° e l of Ch" c¢o" akeu n u i f rio _ _- --' fr fignri L Caoar, . b of I , , efi bat' "fed ! e n ct t 1i that , VC , 00C NUMBE R 8776.] TEAST INDIA HOUSE, S e pt. 26, 1840. 11E COURT of DIRECTORS of the UNITED COMPANY of MERCHANTS of ENG ho - „ IRADING to the EAST INDIES, du hereby give r„, te L i e"Li a GENERAL COURT o f th e sa id COMPANY spill bo , at thei r Honse Leadeoball street, on WEDNE ;I64I. the tub October n ex t, f rom Nine o'Clock ,e LIRE until six i the Evening, tor the ELEC . I i IO. o , a IN6.`' ll /R of the sa n id Company, in the room of Sr ALEX A ALLAN, Bart. deceased. JOSEPH DART, Secretary. Tr. "1E REV. WILLIAM' HETHERINGTON'S CIIARITY 'lO THE BLIND. Christ's. Hospital. October 2, 182 0 . AIREREAS the above-named Gentleman, in tai , his Life-time, enabled the Gorernots of this ULI:NPX ANNUITIES of TEN POUNDS to tack of }II. r ERSONS, in - the hope that his example wants , . be tir e 1 ,!. 4 by Other benevolent characters. The Governors % o i ls "ls public notice, that from. the very munificent ailill acqtjadP to Mr. Hetherington's original Fund, more than li n d Persons are its the Receipt of these Annuities. 11„, . Nortti ttee will sit i n th e oetititing- house ut the said lit tp,, l : l , a lt some ti me i n the mont h o f N ovem b er nex t, t o fill " vacancies as may then have occurred since the Elec -1,,:r .Noveitiber last. ala '' 1 1 1 1 " s are to he had at the Cminting House aforesaid, llii 4 Ne 7th day of October to the :id day of N . ovembet nu ‘ 4 ,), et weers the hours of Ten arid Four (holidays except i `l43)ll ea - r m q Blind Persons duly qualified, upon the petunia iltThe 1 1 " 4 of Friend.* ;) eadistg qualifications are Itereunder stated, anti tinlvs lsiss n ' 4 ties can tespectively prove themselves to be strictly 14 " 1 :1r t k esa niet Applications on their behalf will be en bu"l"s, viz.:— 1 , 'ft that p art o f t h e U n it e d Kingdom called Eng land, and, lNe el' l ":'.`e of Wales and the Town of Berwick-upon- weed. ltesl„t, ' , ( tY years and upwards. ontiness for the space of the last three years. 1)1%7' 4 ". the last three years at least, in their present Ine„, 11 --e °I abode or parish. P (ii anv) to be under the yearly value of Twenty T h‘ ()um, • gr e e ts il l e r w h" have ever begged, received Alms, or are deemed or Parish relief, are excluded frum the benefit of '44l e fit h4rit les, the Donors having expressly declared the sisls Only as have been reputably brought up, and mute -.a nt some addition to what they possess to make life • comfortable under their misfort title of blindness. „ THOMAS WILI3Y, Clerk. great extent of this Charity, it is found in5.,..,14:.21,11e .,..,14:.21,11e t o , a t ten d to , l e tters. ( ;11 17 , ''`'moan ORDER of the HIGH COURT of CHAN , : uria,,titarie in a certain CAUSE, wherein THOMAS tttd others are the Plaintiffs, and the Mo st ; Honour . b' E ORGE FERRARS, Marquess 'ILAN NSHEND, is Al ' 4 : 1 , EIISONS claiming to be Incumbrancers , 1 z flle Estates in question in the said Cause, cont- Zal e 1 0 ; ; ? certain Indentures of Lease and Release of the 9th '",ddys of June, !sib, which Estates are situate in the tli ' t i c , }l W alton-upot: Trent, in the County Derby, and Zioit - t ;,"rishe s of Kolkirk, Gateiey, Horningtoft, easen +re'i,-SPiititt, and Weasenham St. Peters; in the County of "44,ce. and their Solicitori, to come in before \VII ( „''''EXANDFR, Esq. one of •thel Masters t 'et: 4 ' l . at I 'Chambers in Southampton-buildings, l t "Hine Lon don, on or before the 20th day Of No- I "u s ubstantiate oln' their Claims, or, in default. 44 :a. " i4 t ' LL*l : be peremptorily excluded the Benefit: of ,eree. pi,,..hfl--11.:RE ROYAL, DRuRY-r.‘: ,- .E. AT THE immEDiATE PATRONAGE OF Her Grace the Duchess 'of BEDFORD, The Nlarchioness HERTFORD, Itte C o' The Nlarchioness DOWNsHIRE, h 5 4.1 fu tess Essex, r, The Countess Cower, 41: er The Countess Brsho p rough, ‘.. o nautitess Coventry, aNn t t ll .: oltnte f , l4 Jersey Lady Caroline Lamb. L r E rt NO 13ILITY', GENTRY, and LIC arc most respectfully informed, that Mr. slt haying liherallv proffered the use of his Theatre, ki" ,rnfes eir iiind assistance, a BENEI. I f for 1 ,7,"V at l 'I ;1‘111.Y of the late Mr. RAE, will take 1 4 ,7 L h e o „ ..f lIESI) " xi, ‘ OrfOß ER St, 1890. B A '',,, -1 11 he presented ' the Comedy of the PROVOKED . After which, a f VOCAL and IN k.'llt:p—"TAL MUSIC. To conclude with a Favourite I .Ti t h : 4 % will he expressed in future Bills. aild Places for the Boxes may be had of Mrs. Rae, covent-garden L l ks ---7--- , I , IO NCLIT ' SION OF THE Lornity. ---. and ONLY DAY, WEDNESDAY, i.„, 18th INSTANT, when ;() Prizes of ,C-20,000 Sterling Money " 1 :`VO Prizes of: ~Cl,OOO Stet ling Money 444 ..- W° l'" of £5OO Sterling Mont t4t inti • i ntin t r i t e a s pitaYs „ , with every other Prize, also to be • 1 in Sterling Money, pat( .. ,:r. LT . MUST BE ALL DRAWN. 'e ist;;: 11 , Co n t ractor f or th e P res ent L o ttery, submits t4tt incl's, -* S „tate of the %nee l to his best Friends the Public, ;)--g them that 04 -ne 114 Y of Drawing will conclude the Lottery, '''Etieb r, WEDNESDAY, the 18th Instant, ' l3 'l ALL the CAPITALS, and every other Prize nova in the Wheel, DI IS r be Drawn. nisH SOLI) I 13 . 3645 p f t 10,000 • • . a Pr i ze o .. . . kt hi, t . (Drawn on Thursday.last), t' 'lrtnnat Oth 4 CORM-JILL, and 9, CHAR' n(adr,,47o°)S_Si, w e- lier: e T s' lC'K ' ETs and SHARES, warranted Th aat ry are now on Sale; also by his Agents in the It Y l:ar . ti e u r t ,t i / nd "f _Tickets or Shar s e i s o , drawn Blanks the First Itay s t l lt; 14, He ed, that n of receiving 141. car the t °l :ding the chance of th< Next :tt tlk4L"ikag..}W'lllste.ad o n stan ding the chance of ttc Next Will c e as e o n Fridty next, the tdth Instant, s. a l 4n at -; *n ° do i l iot c( d a eli e rtcd the 141. on or before th at . day, ..tev e -e ,, e lyt it afterwa ' rds, but will then be entitled to 1- 4--1 , ,r —tt ir Not b • • fare . drawn on the I tit sat n, t, rh e ► . n ers 111.4) . t '"Ce i . r "ces of Stocks athxed, hourly, BISH's ........„..,....._.),,,. "ti 4 L'irlibill y by which the Public niay see the tluc- --. 1,1 Ti.,? MA GISTRATES AND souurrons._, , (,kv„i),,, ~ , ,,t pnblishvd, price s 4. in hoa rd;, the ,—,..,-„mpENDions ABsTRAcr of 4 ,. (.4 -;V/1/1•1(: GENF) • f ACTS ' passed in t;t: Gen. 141. and ‘.11 :e l. (1 - . 1' bente the .Second SVS;ioli Or the riixtli Parliament ii-Ilited 4 Illitain and frelnd,an ., d ad l i_. hI N en. IV, 1 4 .i„ z th F• . cr , ;ci.ion of the Se v en th r. a . *iti, N of ut t ,, e h s e ar Y i i iit t e n ti n K n i i n e d st v: n i i of Great Britain 0 e Inner Tertint ' n ' and Ire lan d , I tli II Y .14 10 M A W ALTER WILLIAMS, Esq. ' ~..._ in. A iy i t g ', e,, ... t .i i r ,f ri t s l t i r e r s t t it a - t r t r t :LF , : v d . itor of th e Quarto -----...1u0n : Printed for W. Wright, 46, Fleet- street. , ___ 11 ' Itill“, ; • li NG AND CONSTrruTION • - xing LOYA I, PACIPI-11.ETS are jlist P"bush.d, tar with Wood Cots, l aic, Is. each : -1-4/MON LOGWOOD a Radical Tale. \•,-, By ot.i) Tom (if oxFoRD. tr. ; ''''"! r-A v P PROGRESS PUr a Journey to . 15 " 41 i t , ..ry;,,.I)ICAL LETTER -R AG , ; -.. t . 1,\;,4 the TINIFS, by Old TonssOf-ipxf"d.. p rice 9s : '''l . ', : - ''' l F::' , T. or a; Essay toward; the History of i.!,,,,,,,,iiii, time Lord i‘lityor of Londop, Price Si.. a boards. Whit * n : Primed f,,, ‘v. Wright, 4,3, Fleet•streei. "' E "rlY NC t Wet , k will he otili,hrd. . I ;'' ' Sli ' x ' - • • HONE;d The RA •, ' 1 1., I I AVP. :it the BROI•ES an ; ~, . AItNIONIST. or a _Collection of the Songs , an d t' ...I‘ 4t ; ''e n HT tlie late Crown and Anchor Dionct ; to which '`.`l,•tlit; Goose's Apology a Michaeh t no Ode. . . " • ~~~. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1820. CON TRACT FOR FLOUR. ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR SEAMEN, AT GREENWICH, October 4, 18-20. ~ .15C11 Persons as may be willing to Contract for supplying this Hospital with Five Hundred Sac ks of FLOUR, may deliver in thel. Proposals to the Directors of the said Hospital, at this Place, on SATURDAY, the 14th instant, at Eleven o'Clnek in the Forenoon ; and iH the mean time be furnished with Forms of Proposals, and ac quainted with further particulars, by inquiring at the Steward's Office here. N.B. No Proposal will be received after the hour aforesaid, nor will any he attended to that are not agreeable to the said Forms; MA" unless the Partiespersonally appear. LONDON JOURNALS. [DAILY EXTRACTS.] FROM THE MORNING PAPERS. [Morning Post.] THE QUEEN.—The EXAMINATION of her MA JESTY'S WITNESSES was yesterday resumed. Careful to abstain from imitating the conduct of those who have so illiberally attacked the per sons who have given evidence in behalf of the prosecution, we shall not say, because in the case of the defence some things have transpired which we cannot reconcile with other statements that have come from the same quarter, the parties must therefore be perjured. We cannot, how ever, refrain from calling on the public to sus pend their judgment, till it has been seen whe ther witnesses may not be produced (which we have good reason to believe will be the case), to reply to some of these, in a manner that will strip them of that claim to credit which many are at present disposed to allow them, and re move all doubt on the subject. The old joke that one Englishman can beat five Frenchmen at any time, is, it should seem, to be improved upon, and it is now to be understood, that one Englishman can swear down ten Ita- Hans. We shall soon see the true character of some of the witnesses. Several of them have stated that they never saw any thing improper in the conduct of her Majesty, but when asked if they have not said that it was such as to drive away from her those who had any regard to character, " they have had no distinct recollection,"—" they have been satisfied that they have not," or they " could venture to state," that such was not the fact. Dr. Holland was an exception. He swears positively that he had not said, " a person ‘l , ho 11)(1 any regard foa cha racter could not remain in the service of the Princess." This is certainly a statement of some importance, and we will not assume that it can by possibility be contradicted. Dr. Holland ad mitted that it was at dinner-time he had the principal opportunities of observing her Royal Highness ; he knew nothing of her conduct for the last five years, and during the short time he was in her service Bergami had not received his honours and estate from her, 'but was merely a menial servant. [Morning Chronicle.] Every day advances the CAUSE of the QUEEN. Aniong other important parts of the evidence of yesterday, was the complete demolition of the evidence of Sacchi. What a contrast between the clear, firm, and ready manner in which Carlo Forte answered the questions put to him, and the manner of the partisan Sacchi ! There hardly now remains a witness for the prosecution whose credibility has not been completely shaken. We believe the only individual who has yet escaped is the wafter at Trieste. But we can have little doubt that his evidence will in good time be pro perly disposed of;' when we reflect on the very confident manner in which her Majesty's Counsel spoke with respect to this pqrt of the case. We have not heard how many Iv itnesses remain to be examined. Her Majesty very naturally may wish not merely to destroy the authority of the wit nesses against her, but as far as possible to fur nish a contradiction to each particular circum stance injurious to her honour, to which they have deposed. She has, however, already stated more than enough to convince every reflecting mind that the prosecution originated in a conspi racy ; and in any Court of this Country she would be secure of her acquittal. The subdued tone of the Ministerial Press is a sufficient indi cation of the impression which has been made by her Majesty's evidence. In fact the adherents of the Ministry are now heartily sick and hear tily ashamed of the business. They are quite cast down and disheartened. But what must those who have had an active hand in getting up the proceedings now feel ? The evidence for the `Queen having taken so decisive a turn, the anxiety of the Public is now much diminished. Indeed, no one now entertains the _least appre hension for her Majesty. [New Times.] Yesterday the following Wrr..:EssEs were ex amined for her MAJESTY, viz. Dr. Holland, Mr. Mills, Joseph Teuille (a Frenchman), Carlo Forti (a courier), and Lieutenant Flynn, of the Navy. Dr. Holland left the Queen at Milan about June, 1815, and he, like Lady Charlotte Lindsay, says he saw no improprieties in her conduct. Mr. Mills saw no improprieties in 1817 at Rome, where he staid twelve days ; in 1819, at Pesaro, where he staid two days ; and in 18'20, again at Rome, where it does not appear that he saw her Majesty above one day.— The French man proves Bergami'J : highest elevation in the " French army to have been that of a serjeant. Forti is produced to contradict Sacchi, by way , of inference : and Lieutenant Flynn is to de pose. to her Majesty's conduct on board the po lacca. For reasons sufficiently obviou, we shall be very cautious of making any remarks which may assist future witnesses in patching up the weak parts of the defence. We have, be sides, laid it down as a rule to ourselves to impute no evil motives to the witnesses pend ing the proceedings. They are during that time under the protection of the House, and whatever we may think of the prevarication or falsehood of any of them, to charge them with such uffences before the decision of the case, would be to render a fair trial impossible. For the present, we must of course assume that there was some error in the statement on which the Solicitor-General proceeded in his cross-exami nation. But if it should hereafter turn out that Dr. Holland did make the observations above mentioned, what language could be strong enough to mark the contempt and detestation due to such conduct ? Certain it is, that letters from persons in Italy did reach England, fraught with the most scandalous stories of her Majesty, and that travellers arriving from that country did ex press themselves in language too coarse to be repeated. If there were spies, they were the spies ; if there was conspiracy, they were the conspirators; neither the King nor the Govern ment would have moved, had not the scandals of these persons first awakened suspicion, and ren dered the Milan Commission necessary. Now, if such persons can turn round and deny all that they then said, not only „must their portion be infamy and scorn in the opinion of the world, but they ought to be visited with the most rigo rous punishment of the law. Nations are not to be brought to the verge of civil convulsion for the sake of gratifying a petty contemptible turn for scandal ; nor, if their first statements are true, can they be allowed to retract them with impunity. We do not attribute conduct so dis graceful to Dr. Holland, or to any other indivi dual that hag been examined. We only argue on a case that may have occurred, and if it has occurred, we trust it will be exposed to univer sal detestation. [The Times.] It is perplexing to guess what course Ministers may adopt on the present trying occasion. The foul calumnies invented, the wicked perjuries sworn against the QEEEN, disperse and vanish Ix fore the light of truth. Yesterday was another glorious day for her Majesty, and a joyous day to her people. T.ie evidence is clear, satisfac tory, and decisive ; and, which is hardly cre dible, her Majesty's Counsel have still witnesses after witnesses remaining, to prove and establish, over and over again, her innocence. We have no reserve on this side—no bounds need be set to the production of evidence, but the tardy and un willing admission of the Queen's enemies them selves that they have enough. On the contrary, they have witnesses in their Cotton-garden de pot, whom they have never dared to produce.— Heaven and earth ! what must the refuse be when Sacchi, Signor Non Ricordo, and the Countess Colombier (Dumont), are the elite? [British Press.] The examination of Witnesses on behalf of the QUEEN was pursued yesterday at the Bar of the House of Lords with a success commensurate with the most sanguine wishes of the Public. In dependent of the satisfaction which every inge nuous mind must feel at the preservation of in nocence and the developement of truth, the people of England may also enjoy a selfish gra tification in seeing the disgrace and infamy sought to be cast upon her Majesty's fame and character flung back upon the party with whom they had originated. They must be - aware that not the Queen's honour and dignity alone are staked upon the issue of this trial—that guilt cannot be imputed to the Princess of Wales without re flecting disgrace upon her adopted country—and that the Queen of Great Britain cannot be de graded without tarnishing the lustre of the regal diadem. When the Queen magnanimously re turned to England, and claimed the right of an open trial, when she indignantly repelled the offer of a large pension as the price of her honour, we admired her fearlessness of, cha racter, and drew from the firmness' of her demeanour an omen of her future triumph ; but now she is entitled no less to the gratitude than to the admiration of her Country, for in asserting her own fame she has also relieved the moral character of England from a grievous re proach. had she accepted the offer of Ministers the condition upon her part had been eternal in famy. After such a compromise who could have contradicted the fabrications of Majocci, and Sacchi, and Dumont, as they alight b e d o l e d out from time to time in the foul columns of the Treasury Journals ? Who could have repelled the insiduous sneee, the affected sorrow of the Ministers and their followers, lamenting over the infatuated passion of the Queen, and ,the grievous lot of her illustrious Consort in having so frail and so ungrateful a rib ? Who could have ,yentared to fling back 'the lie upon every pre sumptuous foreigner who should dare to couple the name of our Queen with guilt, and load our na tional character with infamy ? From these her Majesty's firmness has saved us, ate, she will have her •reWard in the . recorded triutn . phO her innocence, :and in the n ra• atitank . lrer people. ~4 ~ti • [PRICE SEVtNPENCE. FOR THE SUN. HOLY ORDERS. MR. EntToa—Some little time ago* I ven tured to address you a few lines in answer to a Pamphlet, disputing the legality of cer tain questions proposed by the Bishop of PRZERBOROUGII , to the Candidates for Holy Or ders in his Diocese, which proved, I trust to your satisfaction, the great injustice of the charge: I have now to call your attention to another Pamphlet, most probably by the same Author, called " Episcopal Innovation, or the Test of 46 Modern Orthodoxy, in 87 Questions, imposed " as Articles of Faith upon Candidates for Li cc cences for Holy Orders in the Diocese. of Pe " terborough, with a distinct answer to each " Question, and General Reflections relative to " their illegal Structure and pernicious Ten " dency." To read this formidable title, and. the corresponding introduction, which is all you can allow me the space to consider for the pre sent,—who would not imagine this Prelate, who is usually reputed as one of the most resolute Champions of the Church, to be a very leveller of its Laws and a downright Radical, and endea vouring to overthrow the Church and State together ? But which is the most likely to deserve the imputation, that man who affects to dispute the Articles of the Bishop in an affair that may come within his own proper controul within his own Diocese, or the Bishop, who, ex ercising that authority to the best of his judgment, does not overstep the boundaries of his office, but only proposes certain Questions, which he in his wisdom thinks right, in order to discriminate the qualifications of those who offer themselves for the Ministry—to occupy stations of the most sacred trust, for which he as a Bishop is princi pally responsible, and never can be too minute in his investigation ? But it seems that in these 87 questions, put to the Candidates for this purpose, he commits so many overt acts against the Articles of our Faith, " assuming on the one hand a Legislative. Au " thority in grafting new Articles upon the old, cc and on the other, poisoning the fountain with heretical tenets ;" and yet when we look into these questions we are fairly at a loss to dis cover either the poison or the novelty—the author is affrighted at a phantom of his own rais ing—so far from breathing a spirit of innovation, these questions arise in the most natural manner from the Articles themselves, and may be the only means that remain in the power of the Bishops to preserve them pure and inviolate, and to stem that torrent of superstition which so furiously rages uot only in the hearts of the People, but too frequently in the •btiscnn of the Church, and which, if not impeded in Its course, will, in the end, hurry away every vestige of the real Church and of Christianity itself from time face of Chris tendom. ' • .These, therefore, are not so flinch to l;e con sidered as new Articles, as'intended to elicit the sentiments of Candidates upon the old, as the Bishop himself declares, " that he may know whether the doctrines of the Candidates are in perfect unison with the doctrines of the Church." If, therefore, some will venture before him, whose doctrines are not in unison (and many such, I fear, are now even in'the Ministry, for want of this mode of descriminatiori) whose fault can it be but their own if they are excluded ? If men will rush, with profane temerity, into the borders of the Sanctuary, and not perform the proper rites, or entertain the corresponding opi nions, who but• themselves are to answer for the consequences ? By the confession of the Au thor, " were it not for the influence of a fixed National Creed, upheld and prospered by a gra, cious Providence, we should long since, accord ing to all human probability, have had our land overrun with Popery, Socinianism, and Infide lity;" and were it not for the providential interfer ence of Episcopal vigilance, exactly adapting its ,salutary measures to the times and seasons, notwithstanding all our Articles, bulwarks of the Faith as they .are, and ever have been, we might be exposed to perils from our treacherous friends within, far more: to be dreaded than any perils from our open 'enemies without. It is upon the principle of self-defence from such treachery that this Prelate, who has so frequently and suc cessfully shewn himself a zealous Champion of the Church, comes forward with a manly and open spirit of inquiry, to probe and sift the minds of the Candidates most thoroughly and without reserve, on those parts particularly which have of late become more interesting, from the man ner in which they have been distorted, even by some of our own Ministers ; and it is for the sake of excluding such, and not with the most distant view, as this author would insinuate, of impoe ing any new Articles of his own, or of indulging a passion for 'innovation ; but inspired with au honest zeal to contend earnestly for thb Faith once delivered to the Saints—not to the modern Saints, who. arrogate to. themselves exclusively the name, though, with the s, •ae breath, they scruple not to call themselves the most desperate Sinners,. hat, to the Saints of old, who may be now looking down from on high, and rejoicing with the Angels over this one among the many pious efforts of this Prelate to frustrate the ma chinatiops of the common Adversary, who never enjoys a greater triumph than when he is able to P Kurt Holy Writ • and make the very A r ticles or. Faith, upon,which we all rely for truth and 'consolation, by i n - 14. Construction and 'false LUTp Aifeqly against - the Church itself. lab a Septvtuber.'