The Sun. — London, England, 1820-10-06 00:00:00

:14c1 tagetl. er, have you ever seen any improplivly between theist ? . 1 .1.1,4N0; certainly none. Four Lordship said that there was a slight Lombardy ac- Acnt the Countess of Osldi's Italian ?—Nothing remark able. • Dithyou take notice of her inanners?--Tbey were perfectly inoffensive, there Was nothing remarkable about them, and they were very modest. . OU see any thing vulgar in them ? — Not vulg ar, ter ‘l.4tu, A - airubt having arisen whether the answer was "not psw ticularly vulgar," or, " nothing vulgar in her manners at ail," the question was repeated. Did any thing straw you as vulgar in her manners ?•••-.No- Abysg,attatcli me as vulgar, certainly not. We conversed to ietber, and she atiswered me in pertectly good Italian ; I did not remark any thing vulgar in licr co , versatiun with tue,and no impression reinained Out my mind of having conversed with .aiy,plgar woman. Did you observe any difference between the manners of the Countess Oldi and those of other Lathes ?—I tanniq say I did. ~htl fife out stvihe me as a woman remarkably refined, but certainly not as very different fermi other Italian Ladies. Wecs, her manners and conversation such as to latPressTrou N 1 it idea that sire was a well educated person knew so little of her, that front the few words I had it) conversation . with her at dinner, I could form no opinion on the subject. Did you observe any difference iretween the manners of the •i, ; 'otint-ess Oldi arid other Italia!' Ladies cann o t sty I did. She did 11,9 t appear to be a woman of renunkably re lined wanness. Ahe r Earl of LIVERPOOL—May I ask your Lordship whe ther h er manners and conversation were tire manners and ptivv,er l ation of a person well educated ?-1 tinly conversed with lier in a fete words. I cotild clot form any opinion of that sort. The conversation was extremely short. There was ; ,noth,illt; remarkable in her manners. I ,yv.ilh to ask the Noble Lord how often he met the Conn tcss 7—Twice. Duce at the Villa D'Este and once at the Ilaiisna. .. • .1. ivish to ask whetbet his Lordship 'knew she was thesister 'of Beriami?-1 bad heard she was the sister of Bergami. The Earl of LA UDE.RDA I,F,.—When you was at table with her :Itpy,al Niglt ucss., where did yore Lordship sit bad the ; lioncur to sit by the side of her Royal Highness, DiCi,pergasni receive any particular attention ?—No parti cular attention. ....Did you observe how she conducted herself towards Ber s,i:ttni,?.,---There was nothing particulat in the manners of her Royal I lighoess to Bergaini. • . . I••ltere did the Countess -of Oldi sit ?—On tire other side, opposite me. . Who. was with her Royal Highness at Sable besides the . , Countess of Oldi ?—William Austin, and a medical , man, who they said had been at Corio. I r oARENYON.—I wish to ask iris Lordship, what seas tie size of the boat on the Lake?—it was a small boat. Did you observe the boat more when *you was on the Lake ,i-t, : ,t.4itt•distatice was the boat from shore when your Lord ship saw it 7—Not a great distance. .Was it always within so short a distance that the Noble 1. ird might- see persons in it ?-1 did not see any thing in the boat remarkable. I was in another boat on the Lake. When the Noble Lord saw the boat, was Bergami rowing •.. . it I—Yes, certainly. Earl RATH UILST—Did her Royal Highness introduce the 'Countess of Oldi to the Noble Lord as the sister of Bergami •-•-No, slue -did not ; she introduced her as the Countess of Oldi, but not as the sister of Bergami. TLe.Earl of D A RLINGTON—I wish to aslc, what was the de"portnent of Bergami towards her Royal !Ugliness ?—There was nothing ,particular that 1 observed. 1 have been asked . min:tiler the ground or garden adjoined the Villall'Este. The .ground was -heiriud the house, and the olive -garden is ad , joining that ground or garden.. I do not precisely recollect the size of the:garden. Yon'Say you did not recollect the size of the garden 3 I ask your Lordship whether it formed, in your opinion, an acre ? I- daar.not form an opinion -of the extent-of an acre. ;Was 4t a large garden ?—lt did not appear large. :Lord lIELMORF..—Did your sister, Lady Charlotte Lind sey, leave the service of her Royal Highness of her -own accord, -or Was she disinissed2—Of her -own accord; I -recommended . her. Au icetorn to England. • Marquess LANSDOWN objected to this question as al-cad , .114.4tsestion.. Tim: Eat.' of LIVERPOOL Mbserved., that the rule at the rloselsfahe -examination was, that any rem .might ask a -lead ing question on cross-examination. The Marquess-of LAN SDOW.N zonsidered it au 'improper Aptestion. Lord BELMORE.-11 the question is informal., I will with . • 'draw it. The LORD CHANCELLOR t hen , intimated that the ques tion n3 - $ , not to stand. Lord 4LLENBOIOUGH.—Did your Lordship make arty • -•particular observations on the manners of Bergami ?—The etsi.y .observation I autde on -the , manners of Bevganii was, that he was unassuming and unobtrusive. ever see him in the garden with the Princess ? You ail; whether I saw him in the garden, I rocollect I did, ;-•.;witls the.Princem, hut more than that I do not recollect. DO you ever see Bergatni at any other tinsel—l saw him at . Aslifast, whereleshmed me the pictpres. . . Eroatt ;the -opportunity you bad of being in ilis•company, could you form any opinion whether Ir..e was superior tw his Slttfation.?—No; 1 -did not see that he was. „hSr.PEUMAn requested the last question and answer might ' ' i'efi.eated. It stood thus 'en the short-hand writer's notes:—Eton the -opportunity your Lordship had of recurring to the manners of • • liergatnl,could you form any opinion as to his being superior - to' et& situation in whirl] he was placed in the family .I—No; it Aid net strike me that he was. Lord GLENBERVIE syrorn.—Examined by Dr. LUSHINGTON. "Did your Lordship see her present Majesty:at Genoa A. Z did. Were you accompanied thm ty Lady Glenbervie?-1 was. 3iid Lady,Glrnbervie form any part of the suite of her Ma -jetty`.-=No.; not at that time. I)ei she, at any time, At Genoa, act in the suite •of her Highness the Princess of Wales ?---,She did.—When lier,RoYal Highness arrived at Genoa Lady 'Charlotte Camp ' &11 Was- expected to follow and form a part of her Royal ' suite, but she did snot arrive for twoy.earsl when L4rGienbervie arrived at Genoa she expected to r.etieve Ladyllnirlotte (Ampler:ll; Lady Clenberrie ..having formerly /Avert Lady of the Bedchamber to the Princess, she offered to ' % attchd her Royal Highness until the .arrival of Lady 'Char " I.sitt,'Caitipbeit. T)id you see her Royal Highness often at •Genoal---Fre ' ltiently ; "Lady Glenbervie and myself continued there till . the 7th pf slay; during the period of our stay I frequently • with the Princess, but not every day. . Did your Lordship during the time see Itergaini I—l saw , every day I dined there. Wirat was the conduct your Lordship •erbserved in her Highness and Bergarni when von dined there.?—He was waiting behind her Royal Ilighne.ss in tire habit of a con ' tier'. • I had the honour of sitting near her Royal Highness, and • 1 observed that her conduct was that of a mistress to a ser ...aiit. fte•often helped her to wine. What was the conduct of Bergarui towards her Royal tr! , nets .T . --Tbat of a servant. '"Wai it'respcctful, or otherwise? —4 did not see any parti gular attention, and if there had been any thing of that de 'must have Observed it. • W/11 . Voiir Lordship mention the year in which you was at , 1 ; `Genii 'Pen I—lt was in 1515. • ' What eerupanv did your Lordship alert at her Royal High rscss's „table during the period to which you allude?—"l he Ctitiutees Oldi, a Lieutenant of the Navy, Lally Charlotte Campbell., MIS. Faulkner and her two daughters, I}r. Heal • • lam], Alie . Narquise John, Carlo, Agin, and •otbers. liareyto ever seen any thing offensive in the conduct of Devia'mi'toWards her Royal Highness did nut. Dn you. recollect a hall given by her Royal Highness ? ;: Tbe,oolyball I recollect I was at. Did your Lordship meet at that ball the best company of • the place ?—All the societies I bad been in; the principal Ladies and Gentleman of the place. :•• -CroB-examined by the SOLICITOR - GENERAL. . . , . Your . lairdship did not live in the house? -1 did not, nor Lady Glenbervie. . • When Lady C. Campbell arrived, Lady Glenbervie bad ceasedio"live at Genoa?—Yes. Dow many times had your Lordship been in the habit of dining 4' the table of her Royal Higlinessi—Two or Hoes ti eS4 With. Wliat'w'as the dress of Bergamil—Berganti at that time wore the dress of a servant; be Wore a courier's dress,accord ing to nay...recollection. Jj'l►e Earl of LAUDERDALF...—Did Lord Glenbervie meet Cqptnin P,echel at dinner ?—I think i did. Mr. Rootionam then requested the Lords to indulge Lady Charlotte Lindsay, his neat witness, with a chair. Lady CHARLOTTE LINDSAY Examined. Ladrqbarlotte Lindsay accordingly was conducted to the Isar of the House, and accommodated with a chair. After Ihe - haa • tieen sworn, she was examined by Dr. Lusbington. Did your Ladyship ever form a part of the suite of her Royal Highness ?—Yes, I did. When did you first enter her Royal Highness's service S—lc the year 1808. Did Lady C. Lindsay attend the Princess when she went abroad in 1814 ?—I did. You was one of her Ladies of the Bed-chamber was. How far did you go with the Princess of Wales on that journey ?—I accompanied her Royal Highness as far as Bruns wick. Why did you not go furthers—lt was never understood by ber Royal Highness or me that I was to'go furthr, but alertly accompany her to Brunswick. Where •a - (l , Lady Lindsay afterwards see her Royal High ness ?--4 'saw bey Royal Highness at Naples about the be ginning of March, 1815. Did you then act as Lady of the Be/ chamber to her Royal Highness ?—1 did. i-101 long continue with her Royal Highness!— I her Royal •Highness's suite the tegioniug of March, ; an d .f eth ained Pith her Royal Highness until 1 left her at Naples. dzconiOattied her to Rome, then went to Ovita Vt..c.cliia,•eMbarked with her cm hoard the Cloriude at Leg horn, and twitted her at Naplt4.l Iy whom was her 'Royal Highness visitcd during her resi &nee at Naples ?—By all lirsotis of distinction there. MI the Neapolitan and other Authorities. NN'ill Lady Lindsay Ise pleased to State the natßes of souse of them ?-I,nrd and Lady Glenhervie., 'Lord and Lady Gage, Lord and Lady Holland, told mid Lady Glaze, 'Lord:anti Lady 'Oxford, Sir William (fell, and avany young Ladies. Was your Ladyship on board the'ClMinde With leer Royal Highness ? —I was. Did you remember where she slept ?—Her Royal Highness slept in part of the Captain's -Cabin; It was divided in two. Dots your Ladyship veintruber any thing said about the cabin being divided?—Yes, vententlisti her Royal High ness expressed some wish to have it altered for my accommo- dati,m. 1)11 her Royal Highness have any difference with the Coptalu'?—No, Ido not recollect any difference. . Dues your Ladyship et-collect a person of the name of Bee gami being in the sere ice of her Royal Hightiess?-1 do. In what situatkn was 4se ?—Cou ries% Had you frequent opportunities of seeing what passed be tween her Royal Highness and Beromaiii—l had. How did Ire -conduct himself ?-11 a common way. How did her Royal Highness conduct herself?—ln the same manner; she spoke as a person speaks to a servant. Did you ever ...loser - ye any impropriety of conduct between the Princess and Bergami!---Neeer. When did your Ladyship -quit her Royal Highness's ,ser vice?—ln the year 1817. What was your reason for quitting?—My Brother wrote to me requesting me to retorts. Has Lady Lindsay seen bee Majesty since her return to this country have. Cross-examined fis site S ()MC:TO it-G EN ER A.L. Q. How lung atter Ilse arrival of her Royal Highness was it that Lady Lindsay quitted Naples?—A. About twelve days. now witch time was ocorpiedin going to Naples from Leg horn I?—We were six night malting for awi ud, and two nights on hoard_ When your Ladyship left Leghorn, you did not enter-again into the service of her Royal Highness ?—I did not. What induced you to leave Leghorn left Leghorn its , consequence of a letter. Daring the time you was at Civita Vecchia, did you see Berganai?-1 did. Will you recollect whether you saw Dorval; and her Royal Flightless walking together ?—Her Royal Highness and I frequently walked out together, and Bergami attended; be did not walk with us, but at a distance beliind. Did that happen often?—As often as I walked with her, as far as I can recollect. Was there any other courier in the service of her Royal Highness at that time believe Hieronymus was also a courier, hut I act not eeitain. Did ,your Ladyship mean to say Hieronymus walked out with her Royal Highness?—No, I do not recollect that he walked with her. Have you any doubt of it ?—I do not think he did. How often did your Ladyship walk with the l'rincess ?—I bad the honour of walking out with her Royal Highness twice. 1 think i heard you say you walked with 'her Royal High ness several times.-1 -don't at this time call to mind more than twice. Perhaps you will swear you did not go ire or six times 2 Yes-; I can swear t hat. Every time you did walk out the Courier who attended you was Berganii?—l think it was. Will your Ladyship take upon you to swear that on these occasions you never saw her Royal Highness walk ariu in arm with Bergami ?—I do not recollect.. Will you swear Ise , did not ?—As far as I -can recollect Ber .gatni attended at a proper distahoe, and when -he was called he was asked a vieStion. Then you don't recollect whether its walked ants in arm with her Royal Higlinessl-1 eaunot positively swear; but 1 never was struck with it. You will not swear it did not happen will -not swear, because such a thing might have happened wit/tout being thought extraordinary. You have _stated that she might possibly have taken hit arm Without any . thing being thought extraordinary ?—Yes. Your Ladyship filled the -office of Lady of the Bedschambei —I did. That office led you to her Royal High ness's bed-room? — Very frequently. At Naples?—Yves. Was her Royal Highness generally alone en those occa sions ?—Not always alone certainly. Sometimes persons were with her ?—I saw her Royal High ness myself in her bed-room. We dined in the bed-room with Bergami and Williams Austin. Bergami waited on us as a set vant. Was that at Naples.?—Do ring the time I was at Naples. Did any other person .but yourself and William Austin -dine on those occasions ?—No; I think nobody but we three dined. Did that happen -freqnoutly when her Royal HighnesE: was at Naples ?—Yes, whenever her Royal Highness had not com pany at .dinner, and one day when I went to l'ortici. Did Bei - pull always wait?—! think Ise slid, but I cannot swear. When was it Lady Lindsay left the service of her Royal Hightsessl—ln 1817. I - lad any application been previously made to join her Royal Highness in GermanylYes, there had. How long lee-fore -cannot correctly remember. Was any proposal made about appointing Col. Lindsay to the Situation of -Chamberlain to leer Majesty? Mr. ILLOIIaiIAM objected to this question. The Soticiroa-GENcont. urged it .as a regular quest;on. The LORD CHANCELLOR intimated that the House ought to take the question into considera tion if it was pressed on one side and objected to on the other. At this stage of the proceedings it was four o'clock, and their Lordships adjourned. PROCEEDINGS OF TIIIS DAY. Prayers were read this morning at ten o'clock by the Bishop of Buisror... There was a consi derable crowd below the Bar. Excuses were made for the absence of his Royal highness the Duke of York, owing to indisposition, and also for the Marquis of Northampton and the Earl of Bridgewater. At about 20 minutes past 40 o'clock, M. Marietti, the younger, was called to the Bar, when he delivered in the additional letter, which he yesterday had promised to bring with him. WITNESSES FOR HER MAJESTY. The Counsel were then called in, and Lady CHARLOTTE LINDSAY was introduced to the Bar. Cross-examined ky the SoLicrrou-GENERAL. Q. Did her Ladyship know whether there was a garden in the neighbourhood of Naples in which she had walked with her Royal Highness.—A. She did. Was Bergami also present at the tittle?—He was. Did her Ladyship, in going to Naples frost Rome, travel in the same carriage with her Royal Highness?—She did. Did Bergami at that iteriod tide as *cootie' I—He Did her Ladyship go in the same carriage on the iournay to Civiti Vecchia?--She did. At that time also did Bergami ride as courier I—She be tieved he did, but could not recollect it so well. On that occasion did Bergauti come up to the carriage and address the Queen ?—She recollected his cowing up to the carriage when he-spoke to her Royal Highness, who gave him _provisions and something to drink. Could her Ladyship recollect if there was any bottle in the carriage her /loyal Highness travelled in?—'there was. llid Dergatni think from that buttlel-7She thought he did. Did 13erganii tirink from the mouth of the bottle or out of a glass ?—Front the bottle. Did he afterwards return the bottle to her Royal High ness ?--She could not decide that ; though she was not co.- tAin, to the hest oilier recollection he returned it. Does not her recollect now whether he returned $e bottle or threw it away . —She thought he returt.ed it. When at length her Ladyship quitted the service of her Royal Highness, did she not state to somebody, that it was a vast relief to her mind in quitting the service of her Royal Highness ?—She bad no distinct recollection of having said so. Does she not remember stating any thing to that purpose or effect - ?—She did not recollect it. Did not her Ladyship say, that it was a vast relief to her mind in quitting her Royal Highness's service, and that no woman who had any regard fur her character could rt121:1111 iu the service of her Royal Highness?—She did trot recollect her stating any thing to that effect. Would her Ladyship then undertake to say that she really did net make use of these words ?--She had no recollection of making use of them, or any such 'words. Would her Ladyship then persist in saying that she never had mode use of these words ?—She could only say that she thought it extremely improbable she shoull, and that she bad nu recollection of them. Would her Ladyship now undertake to say that she had not made use of words to that effect more than once ?—She had no recollection of having used such words, and did not think it probable. Did she net say, after quitting the service of her Royal Highness, that," were it not in order to serve a particular in dividual out of her "savitigs, she would have quitted her ser vice long ago?"—She thought it possible Site might, but she did not recollect. Hiving now called these cirkionstances to her Ladyship's recollection, could she remember if the former words were not used at Sgme . time or other ?—She had no distinct recollection When she had said she was induced to s kier Royal Highness's sees-ice in order to serve an individual, but it was nut coupled .with such words as those. Could her Ladyship be positive of this ?--;--She could only say that she bad no kind of recollection of it, and that she thought it not at all probable. Was it to be understood, then, that it was -not positively so ?—Sire had no recollection that she ever said that no wo man of character would remain its her Royal Highness's ser- vice. [Here the Solicitor-General -reminded her Ladyship tha this was not an answer to the question he had put ; but she still declared that the bad iso recollection of the words im puted to her.] Her Ladyship had stated that she received a communicetion from the Earl of Gisildfosal; Was the conversation before or after that communication I—She could not recollect if it was before or after. Could her Ladyship reoolleet if it was about the sar4tr tsrwe ? —She did not reeollect. Was it after she hail resigned bee situation with the Prin cess of Wales I—Site did not know. Were there no circumstances to being it to her Ladyship's recoßectiun I—There were some; and she thought the men tom of her remaining in service was after thecommunicatinn. Mr. DENMAN here asked the witness if the commonsica tion bad heen made known to any one; to -which -she replied that she had communicated it to her husband, and tootle else. In answer to another question, it appeared that Mr. Lindsay had beets in distressed circumstances for some years. Mr. BROUGHAM here interposed, and shewed the object of the last question, which was to chew that Lady Charlotte Lindsay had quitted her situation from embarrassutenta, - aud not owing to her dislike to the Princess. Witness now withdrew from the House being much affect ed, lint soon returned. Q. Had her Ladyship any communication -while in bee Royal Highness's service -on the subject of a salary ?—.l. She had ; for -at one time arrears were due to her. Had any other circumstances in 1817, reasle the service of her Royal Highttese empleatant do bee?—lt was particularly disagreeable toher,-becanse she was under -considerable de pression -of spirits at that time. Had her Ladyship 'lost any body at that time ?—She had lost two relations, Lord Guildford and Lad} Gleniservie. (Here her Ladyship wept, and could scarcely speak.) Had she ever observed any impropriety in the conduct of the Queen, to induce her to quit her service ?—She -never had observed any such impropriety As Intkuceal her to quit the Princess's service. Ay a PEER. Q. From the effect that her Ladyship's evidence was likely to base on the present cause, it was -wished to as. -certain how long she had •1n,e41 about the Catieeu. witness had said that she bad been at Rome, Civita "%rec. chia, and on board the Clori-nde, in all 24 days-; therefore tier experience e-f the conduct of the 'Qtseen extended only to the space-of -24 days?—A. In Italy. Her Ladyship had said that during that time slue had ob served no impropriety in her Royal Highness's conduct to Bergami, or Bergami's to her I—Duriog that time she had observed no impropriety on the part of her Majesty -in her in tercourse With Bergalei. Could her Ladyship say whether Sit W. Gell joined her Majesty's service at Naples I—He had. Had Sir Was. Gell remained at Naples or left it?—Sir Wm. Grit bad resigned before they left Naples on account of ill health. Did her Ladyship know whether the Hotiont able Keppel Craven had joined her Majesty at Naples?—lie had. Did he remain there?—'He had not remained, hut resigned-. Had Captain Hesse joined them?—He had. Did he also quit at Naples ?—He At the time they quitted the service of the Queen, was her Ladyship aware that any one else joined her I—There had. -Did her Ladyship -recollect a young woman named Faus tina?—ihe could set recollect. Did her Ladyship 'know a person of the name of Louis Ber ganti, and whether lie joined the Queen I—She was nut quite certain, thought she recollected him, but -could not speak with certainty. Did she know any thing about the mother of Bergarui, as to entering the Queen's service?—tike did not.; she had -ne ver known any thing about her till lately. Did she know any thing of a child named Victorine, athe ing in the Queen's House I—She knew of no child being in the house. Her Ladyship had said, that she saw nothing improper in the Queen's conduct while in her service ?—She never bad seen any -thing improper in the thlet during th it time. Had her Ladyship heard any report respecting the Queen ? [Here there was some murmuring in the House, and the question was not persisted in.] The LORD CHANCELLOR—Your Lordships .can admit no reports of any kind. Examination reeume Q. Can her Ladyship now recollect if there were any-other circumstances which operated on her mind in quitting the ser vice of the Queen ?—Slue certainly had not seen any impro priety while in the service of the Queen; butt there were re ports of so unpleasant and degrading a maitre, as partly to operate on tier mind its q-aittkig the -service of the Queen. Had leer Ladyship observed if her Majesty showed a degree of familiarity to her servants, male and female, not becom ing her dignified rank?—She remarked that her Majesty was affable and familiar-to RH her Servants. Did the Queen's condescension to her servants exceed that of people of rank in this countryto their domestics ?—She had observed that persons of-rank in country were more con descending to their servants than ,persons of a lower class: and there was sotilethieg peculiar ha the lecher-lone of the Queen. Had that familiarity senile part of the Queens greatly ex ceeded that generally sheen by foreigners? —No, not gt catty. Whets her Ladyship said that she saw no impropeieta; in the conduct -if Bergatni lei the Queen, or the Q*Cels towards hint, (lid she speak with reference to what she had described as pe culiar in the behaviour of the Queen I—She bad. Could her Ladyship say whether there kni4lit not appear an extraordinary and unbecoming mode of conduct, if in at person of more reserved habits than the Queen?—Her Royal Highness talked to Bergami as site -did to Sicard and aid the other persons its her family. Had -her Ladyship's brother at anytime communicated any reports to her respecting the Queen, and advised her to quit her Royal Highness's service?—(Thin question was objected to, and the Noble Peer withdrew it.) flit Earl LAUDERDALE—Did bee Ladyship -quit the set vice of the Queen in consequence of the letter she received front the late Lord Guiletfoedl—(Here the eortfusioet its the House prevented us 'from catching the answer.) Could her Ladyship say that she quitted in consequence of the request so made, or on account o f the difficulty of obtain ing her salary I—Answer wits tonsudible. [Here much discussion took place respecting the necessity of not putting more questions on this head, till it was ascer tained if the lettere-mild he produced to the House.] The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that it was necessary to invite whether the letter iii question was in existence at all, anti if so, whether her Ladyship had made any search foi it. Mr. 13110V(41,131 here objected to the production of the let ter, or to direct her Ladyship to search after it, seeing it was written by a pt . ! son who was not a party to the case, but by a relative to the witness, who himself was a stranger to the matter. The LORD CHANCELLOR ,aid, her Ladyship had beets asked why she quitted the service of the Queen, when slit re- plied that it wfis In tsar severiee of the request of Lon' ford. Non., having 'staled that, either the evidenc e 56 ,:;41 corded ought nut to, remain, or the letter should be s eacl" foi, t the option of Noble Lords. Lo a rd Eau(' NE thought that the Lady at the Bar had OIL' her evidence with great fairnesi. She had stated she $0"; thing in the Queen's conduct and Bergami's to induce be quit the service; and hero the matter, in his opinion, 51°12 end. tbt The Earl of LIVERPOOL woad give no opinion On yt subject ; but if any of their Lordships were of opinion t"tre, the letter ought to be produced, her Ladyship should be rected to search for it at once, withdraw fur the presents g save trouble both to herself and the House. Earl GREY 1. -we understood, the prodoctioei opintara, as the letter. - In answer to some further questions by the Earl of f tik,l DERBALE, her Ladyship stated, that when she was at arq she seldom went into the hed-chamber of the Queen with(); being sent h always without nocking at the ile e She added, ( that the proposal for uittin k g the Queen nrig ilat: ed with herself, in coos( (Netter of an invitation from her WI :. thee to return to England, as she wished to reach this col a try in the beginning of summer, she therefore left tbeQu iu flay or June, 184 5. The Earl of LAUDERDALE now moved that her Lail should be directed to search for the letter ; which the 1 , 4 f Chancellor then directed her to do agreeable to the orde r their Lordships, wad she withdrew from the THE SUN. SOLER QLTIS DICERE F.ILSUM ICDE4.- LONDON, FRIDAY, OCTOBER. 6, is°'O• SECOND EDITION. 0- SUN-OFFICE, Half-past For- The other Witnesses examined this day, the Hon. K. - EPPEL CRAVEN, the Earl of 14° f' DArr, end Sir WILLI tat GELL. The eiiicle uce of the latter went to negative the testimony the Bill respecting TILE QUEEN'S conduc t the Masquerade at Naples, and her leaving t be Theatre early, r was alleged, to commen ce criminal intercourse with BERGANIT. Of flit 04 alleged criminal intercourse, Sir WILLIAid:G f who was one of HER MAJESTY'S Chagiberial" deposed, that he never witnessed any eir cliu? stance to lead hill to believe, that such tercourse subsisted. lie also spoke . of JY r GAMI as a Gentleman in his conduct andl°r ale rs. • At four o'clock, the House adjourned till tr vuorrow We received this nio!ning .the Paris raP e ' Tuesday last.—The following are extracts l 2 l " PART', OcT. S.—Yesterday the King successivel)' I J O' acted `business with the Alinister fur Foreign Affairs Duke de Richelieu. SEVF.NTI-I BULLETIN of the Ili sttrt of their tt,4' iii ,hnesscs thwthwitecs de BEaut nod the Dalke TwAtIX, .2 , .d Oct. 9, A. M. Their Repya , l Ilighties,es the Duchess 4e Berri '"w,l/4.° Dnhe of Bourdcaux have pa.oetl an excellent -Ili , a very weal this morning: • BULLETIN, A r. nt The state their Royal Ilighoes•cs the Dtic*,4,,,:. . A, Berri and the Duhe of llourileaux, leareS moiling . to de! e' " A great oes‘vd assembled yesterday helore the 01 of the Duchess de Berri, •to see the young. Prince. i f t`7; " Yesterday at I, A. et., says the Journal dc Tror• d oer lit instant, a Courier of the Quetn.of F..! r fland.r.' se 4 „ll on his way to Italy. At two, he was met by a Courie(..o.,e Queen, who heft Milnat last Wednesday, and is to art London next Monday. FIVE PEIL CENTS. Monday -. 731. 75 C. DRF ERRED -STOCK. Of - tile I'M Sept. t 820............ g 9 f. t; e 64 "MAPLES, SEP r. 14.—The Cousti.tutional Jour4,3l}:„).cil Two Skilies states the arrest of several individuals spired to bling About a Connter-vevolution. " Defensive preparations are cosstinued the N ' activity. The CO4iticription is carried into effeot greatest rigonr. .3 Rosa, SEVT..l7.—=The Pope is said to hasse,beeo (4,er) solicited on the part of,, ; tlie Caballet of Vienna to c, 1 ".04 in the establishment <it a Confederation of all she 1.4 l° l Estmtsn OrEitA-Roust:.—The season to r; last night at this elegant and agreeable Til e A ,set' a Theatre which, from its cou'voliest aii67;-4* t l . calculated to promote the best purpose s o ll Drama by " useful mirth and salutary 1 ", e; is merely justice to the Proprietior st3vs'ilg' he had collected a 'sufficient number of Performers, among whctn were se veral 0 0, guished favourites of the Public. Short few „ 4 season has been, he has also brought .or it many dramatic novelties of various decl;_,lk which have been very favourably re cei4 - e u. • "- 0 BARmty, who deserves praise fits as an Actor, as well as for his 006-0 firmness, and diliffence as the stage ftlf i came forward and delivered the followint.0)0::, well Address with modest dignity, and 0.04 throughout was received with the vgarr9 pause of °l o c i ' LA , DIES AND CEVTLEMEN.,—The zirenn tances f o r son, which ends tins evening, render it isnlms sib ' , e ii annertince a prospei Otis issue tot the Proprietor t° ,tr• - twos for your totertainment• ne r ee de o r ts The pectiliar, and, I I may sags "-. e at f` event of Drury• lane Theatre having olven ed at rind as to leave only twenty-tive twe nty-si% ni , n ; ~11 0 summer theatres, unopposed by the gi,ralitie Sifidder ing Strength of the Patent Properties; hies rel the possible for the Proprietor of this Th ea tre to re'sr or t i iel , ol 4- traits of his industry, or even the commo n wag e% • p eot A lawful labourer in your service has A right W e b p enjoy. tb i4 ' We do not is:inten - d against the righ t to respectfully suLsoit to you and to theni, that 'Tis excellent i OO Ol To have giant's strength ; but it is tr . sf el, To use it lite a giatst v ettl_ n iri t o f Still, Ladies and Gentlemen, the ProPrietT, his 700'0 boast that you have experienerAl Ito reliutaliauoint°/,(oiief exertions to deserve tour patronage; nor 01 VCc:,,a , ,',o in the performances to conciliate your fat .l ",! r• jestri , IF - tr feel, that as far as uppluicve is the criterion 0 ' : ea solii of ': e 4e deserved your approbation; and if, dorinl 3 he ote lt o t t than ordinary hardship, to hare obtained t o fol sr°, d r remitted zeai in the production of Llighll°"‘ f e tion''ied'of rutty aovaiired as a pledge for future clioocko,..o* may !sow take my leave without the twin' loll ° of" that every totty - e etrort will be made tio n. „tor+ + tinnance arid increase of your further protteprofactc' Ladies and tient 'emelt, in the name 0 i hid yo tt 1"" of all the Performers, I now respectfu ll y -.A. Priuted II J. B. CA a sTA I as, i ~`a- ~, ?toy (if 1 , 1 tot tl ri, t'4tl 4ktitti N . l t4 r . S., r h i 1; e r~~t~;t 0„ •. „, 41* +4 . ---- 1 •,(T 4 4: t.\ ; krt .1 3 ;1 . r; ,~,E } ~•~ ~~ l:~ j tt