The Sun. — London, England, 1820-08-24 00:00:00

it of the or Q 1 D th e i not :bat 3 [ ether t used e ly an with ound• up al t tent•. Lop or e bath o f ?--- leis O." iS S S ' r ; C a lOW 1 ' ut bd. 0. 01! ; HO' fork! at IU er oli" d ' IWO li p fiat! , le AV.! eCUI' 5 al' tOeS 0 3:1111i the U clai i hG aii• 4 i t att tit r ite• d e 113,1" hr I t pe ruoul itc ° or I , 0 1 aug y er t l I f sto'w4 )bet , ;, D1 Oat , • vo v be w" broil/ it neo ' (t 4 the Cod D i it, a ob 3t o' - e C e J I ! (1 c0 he oto tb e I o i 0 00, J 1 ~ ~,trY°l tMO • ase (id on "at 4 e ronce:r ;id i"ije 01 0 133 rt of ( lore , 30 ,1 )near, do etti, f t pc 1 " c 1 u q i •Tb e 4: 11 the irst caL" 7 011 , . e 5 11i P't he „ :he °'lvor e ig tb ° I tile this Ll'lcoi Ot ie O. " • the witlol it to e olv. row :of ' ,„teo ,C jotige-, ro ° ' " tot fir ba t set* When oa lift tunis id Sou sail o any o.i - ha. place.2llalta. • . . After you l e ft Tunis dici..l3esgami ..sleep in the same place, or in ally otter part 'Of the veSsal"?=His bed sk•ets renoved into the dining on the right side of it. Was.the right hand side Of the dining cabin nearer or farther Irons. tbePrineels-'S ihe ''oliainher of the Princess W as on the right also, and they both came into the dining t "tn, it must hare beers nearer, as they were both on the same side. 'W hereabouts was tbe door leading to the Princess's bed ;fl : ino i n n s g;fi ri si:s e , m iaioni of the Princess had a door leading into the and one that had a comunithstion nith the nom of the dame d'honneur. Ask if the door was inside the Princess's chamber ?—The c hamber of the Princess was divided into two, one division o f which belong e d t o th e Princess, the other to the dame nneur. Ask when Bergatni's bed was ternoved to the dining room ; !I'm far it was from thedoor which led to the Princess's din -5t5 " 6 "na ?—The room of the Princess had,a wooden partition 'die% divided it from the rest of the ship; on the other side Z ts ,the coop o f th e ship ; !sear the cabin; on the left, was e h est of the princess ; near the middle of the partition was the door of the Princess's chamber into the dining room, and ‘'n the right hand of the dining room, at a certain distance, Was th e bed room of I3ergaini. bed if the doors were open, if a person in the Princess's Might see a - person in the bed of Bergami ?•- - --Why not ?. the situation of the beds was such that 'they could not help 4 ,eing both together ; but a person who stood upright could place himself in a situation not to see, hut certainly the bed - e,. 1 1 . might see the bed of the Princess. "Vire there not two doors ?—After the ship sailed from t iniS one door was closed, nailed up. "ter that was there one or more entrances into the dining l oo m out of that passage ?—There was the other door. Where did you go to from Tunis?—'l'o Malta. And thence where ?—To the Island of Milo, and after much 3"yage to St. ' Jean d'Acre ; after that the Princess went to rusalem, the holy city. Ask if he to actompanied the'Princess on that voyage to ?--He did. Ask whether during that journey they travelled by night "."tiY day?—'The whole night and part of the day; that part ' ell it because too hot to travel' they stopped to rest them when th e y res t e d theinselVeS by day, any tents were " ' cl eft ?—Not always; for at Naiareth they lodged in a pri .vaie house ; at a little distance from Jerusalem they pitched it lent, • 11 0 e -s he •know in which of the, tents Bergami rested ? , i 1 here the t en t s were pl ace d th e y di nes ! also; in one of them Princess dined and in this tent there was ais iron bed l'ie4d, and upon it" nailece of matting. There dined in this ha; Countess Oldi, Mr. Austin, and Dergami, and when they I, (l ane, lie went to dine himself. • ti ti. "'s lie hnow whet e these different persons rested after ';" Princess's tent he knew, but not the others, e went to dine himself. Nl ° You know Where Berganti slept ? Ipein neriinan interposed to object to any further question Init to the witness on this 'point, as lie acknowledged 1; Ile was not in situatiou to know. to Attrirney , General maintained that the question was rfeeit \, • 1 regular. Denitiair--I don't object to the question itself, hut I I; e 'i L ect toiti being put after the answer' he has just given, for a t, " 4 ' Placed liiinself in a situation not to know any thing out wi,. is asked him. • th e he objection was over-ruled by the Lord Chancellor, and witness was called upon to repeat Isis answer. positively caa't know, because I left them, and went to to k h r. Penman—Now f object to anything further; for this is k ri - o l P i ele- We must only have what lie can say from his own ~ ,Wledge—no t bing fr o m imagination. t 4"e Attorney -General—We ought to know the whole an but he is stopped half way. no ! he Lord Chancellor decided that the interpreter' could n , "slopped till it appeared that the witness spoke from his , it ?Sination, and not trout his knowledge. That which wit ai,'s imagined could not be stated, and the interpreter was I " te d Sc, notify to the witness that he could only be al ('"„v d to speak of that which he knew. tent a witness ever see Bergami reposing under any other the witness ever present at a church there any par -',U,rar ce r emony ?—I was. W as the Princess there ?—She was. ". What was the Ceremony ?—Witness described several of ofMajesty's suite to have been made Knights of the Order e rea witness remember while at Jerusalem that any other ) 4 ‘) :l". er was given to Bergami?—He did not recollect any ill ! he was at Jerusalem. t e Piti witness remain with the Princess at Jerusalem, or did Itoy r a et iZ i before, her to Jaffa ?—I went to Jaffa before her Did She 14, loess. .embark at Jaffa on board the same ship ?—Sbe A the ft left Jerusalem was any tent erected on board of. w • rh ere was. • W as th e tent closed at night ?—lt was. as Oi ly sofa or bed placed under that'tent ?—There were ' cif - re was a sofa and a small bed, the sam e that her Royal 1.1 ' n ess always travelled with. °Tv will were Litt bit d it of ro uomnder to p that as .rent?—They made an " le b . a 4 o witness keen in that tent at night I have. ga:" was in it while he was there ? I•he Princess, Ber. IV, and some other person. n ut .on kno w who remained i ts it during the night ?—I do tei "uw who retrained in it ,during the Banerti Is the A. 4 :. t . s lttee was a thereforconunicatii.n l i i i e d ln i w w , t a k i a l ow„ hether the ser -111. sremained he seen the tent raised in e :the te m at or a tti;:g a ?—Yes. . it was raised in sf ie l'al he seen any body under t 10 4 ' 14 i 1 1.,.'•—1 have "seen Bergaim alt the bed. -; nert • was „ n th e e d., h ow was dressed ?—He lowir d d n r s e s ss a n d .above Grecian . capote. , wai that ?—A beltutiful morning ad with large sleeves. witness' known the tent closed during the day ?—I have. how long?—For a little time.: ha Wh— day ) was under the tent when it was closed during the •' • t he Pri ncess , Bergami; and some person who assisted bi el "tog it. d • I I t. , t hat person remain under it i or t c , ome out ?—Many times ' l e seen the party come out, bn •at .. L other times I do not uwwhether he had come out or the Lad y. 1) 0 th, s she know by whose directions the , ter i t:W so a n s w c t l i o u s l e e d s on y t ' l l : ' , : e. 4ce" e s ls i° e ' , ls l ? ) --- ut S aTes i • e a t y i s m b e y s o b t y ie ( o a f n l i t e e i r a, Boyal Highness's j„"as witness seen her Royal Highness and Bergami walk ton deck ?-1 have. ?—Arm in arm. witness been on deck when they . were walking ?-1 • f t . lit w hat situation hula he seen them then ?—ln several dif ; ,24rent sitnation s . I have seen them seated ?to,a.ags"an ;arm small • i tua t i . e behi n d t h e back of the other, be c ause a atall so metimes Berg sir i was seen stretchedrn: his back nn his L „ ,led, and th e P r i ncess near hi m s itti ng forward ; bet Were- h a lf f happened the Captain' usually. sent me away, as we do 4 latives. as ) Witnessre seen the Prince's's and Bergami in otter situa- ; I n have. • see n Mia t situation s he seen them ?—Sometimes I hawe ihe.„,nr.ergatui sitti ng on 'a e bench near to inmast, with st ock 14 eess- on his lap or thigh,. her ar l n li t•b n e ' ilig round his 1.114 or shoulder: b.aei c s t was Bergatri• arm placed then ?.—lt was , behind rou t n h d e 'hes,-`,_,the Princess, and the arm of the Princess was lk e t „, c4 of Bergami. th et t „, e ss has 'stated that there was a sofa and a bed u nder pas 4; 4 .1' does he know where the bed was taken front 1)4 b 441 ironedsteail, and -that with tine bed had come Ike With the luggage. Wit n ,, s he know where. that bed was previously placed ? fr,,lt'ss describ e d t h e b ed, and staled it to have . bee i n , taken i ti elioZ t rg the luggage, with which it had previous liesei` 4.la tl C, 'le remember on the voyage the celebration of St. I)i,icl•umew's day, the ./4111 August do. .""" 43 t h ing particular occur on hoard the ship . that i d , a t y .m ? eera i l i rm g that 'dav there •vais general mirth nn brim d. 4 " ill 'g '.dishes were ',treed with lights in them, so as . t o s ma k e were Riv e , uttnination all over the ibip, and all the sad . or d . anced, `"Ld e ' r o ,, l ' ir iuk, by ord e ,• o ( Iterganii.. All the . . crew , . •cr op Lon t holontew, the Princess, and the "Mi er g live Bar Whet ~rder s Bergami came on board at Jaffa, did he we pc arar t i l y . cos`' ) "t that o f St. Sepulchre ?-Several persons of t he "te wore another order. Was that order called ?—Th . e order of St. Caroline. Do Cros s - eXantined by MT...DENMAN. lie n ,„ l;>`Bmember who had the orders that you have men ~~tlterc had them .Austin, Dr. Holland, Camera, and tN lt gut li o , ( ! not all who had been at Jerusalem with her Royal 4 h that M order ?Not all, but only six or sewed persons ave entioned. Wltness it t't NeapMltan by hi E rth, wht4.e does he live now . I am of Messina, heatise my father is fixed at Messina. What is his businesi or trade ?—He is_ first Pilot in the Royal Nary of Naples. He has the rank of an Officer. I suppose witness is ndt married himself am not. Has witness always gone by the sanie name ?—Yes, cer tainly; I never chan4ed my name. Was his name well known on board the ship he speaks of? certainly, to all the crew, who knew me to be the Pilot. How many did the crew consist of ?—We had twenty-two iii the whole. . Were they all , constantly employed in the management of the ship ?—The crew were employed both in mancearring the ship, and in waiting On her Royal Highness, as 1 was myself. Have you seen any of them lately ?—Yes. Within a wee4?-1 hare seen the Captain. . What is his name ?—Vincentia Conjuno. Have ya a seen no other person of the crew within the bit week ?—No. Have you within the last half year?-,-Two months ago', I saw a sailor. What•was the name of the sailor, that witness bad seen within the last three months ?—Filncisco Cawpeon. Where did you see him ?—At•Nhessina. - • The gun, that witness has spoken ot, was it on deck ?—On deck.. • Was the bench on deck ?—There was on the deck a trap door, and the bench was over that door. Had you access to all parts of the deck at alt times?—As soon as the tent was closed, nobody could pass or go by the tent, but in all other parts of the ship he could go. • Was witness ever at Milan ?—Yes; now on the way here. Did witness come by sea or by land.—From Messina 1 went. by sea to Naples, from Naples Paris, from Paris to Dieppe, front Dieppe to Brighton, and thence by landlii Lrindon.. • Was that the first time of your being at:Milan ?--,YeS. • Who first applied to you to come hers on thiS - birsrness ? The English Vice-Consul at Messina. - • - - • When was it ?—About the 23d, 24th, or 25th of last month. Was that the first time that you were desired to give evi dence on. this subject ?—Yes. • • Did you go to the Consul; or did the Consnl come to you —The Consul came to me, because he wag charged to do so by the Minister at „Naples. - What are you to' have for coming here ?—For what I Mare lost very little indeed. What is it that you are to have ?.---Coming here I am to have a compensation for the chip and trade 1 give up. to come herr, 800 dollars per month. - The Interpreter stated the value of the dollar to be 4s. 3d., 4s. 4d., and once in his life he bad known it to be 4s. 6d. Did you pay your own travelling expences ?-1 have paid nothing, for I was accompanied by a Courier, because the Minister gave me to the Consul, and the Consul said if I did not go I should be obliged to go by means.of the Government. I was nat willing to come but was made to come-. -" Who was the Courier that accompanied you to-Naples and Milan ?—From Naples to Milan I -was accompanied by a Courier named Nicola, : o4 Mr. Crowse,brought nre trtre. How did you travel from Naples to Milan ?—ln a - calache. I could not come on foot. : • . . ' In a stage coach or diligence ?—ln a public carriage. A hired carriage for two, i❑ which no stranger could take his seat?—These questions are useless. I saw the horses changed'; the Minister gave 'me to the Cootie'', and the COn rier brought nie here, that is all that I know. The. Minister gave you to one courier, and he gave you ano ther to'Mr. Crowse. As it not, so?—Courier took me to Mi lan. There Colonel Brown, lo whom we brought a letter, handed me to the courier, who brought me kere: - How long was this witness at Milan ? do not know, as I have not my memorandum-book in my pocket ; perhaps two or three days. Where were you those two . or three days ?—At an inn. How often did you see Colonel Brown there ?.--When took the letter to him, and when I went to take my leave of him, with the second Courier. , • . Have you seen a man of the name of Berrrada do not know; this is the first time that I ever heard the name; Was witness examined? Did be see any one taking down What he bad to say ?—Yes, at Milan. ' Who were present ?—Colonel Brown, two other persons, and one who wrote, making four, and myself five. Did Colonel Brown put questions to witness ?—Yes. Just like this Gentleman . , he told me to tell the truth, and what I had seen. Were you sworn on the Cross of Christ ?—I was not, be cause I was not asked.: but if I bad, it would have been - the same, for I bate told the truth, which I would swear to a thousand times. _ Had witness bcen examined at Naples before he set out No. _ _ How did von travel from Milan lo Paris with Mr. Crowse ? —ln a carriage also. Were you alone, or were other persons with you ?—Alone ; Land Mr. Crowse and the posthoy. It was. a four-wheeled carriage, with two seats. When did you arrive in London ?—Yesterday... • • How long did you remain at Paris ?—We arrived in the morning, and set out at night. Did any body at Paris talk to you on this subject ?—Not with respect to the deposition. .Diff . any one talk to you at Paris about what you had to say against her Royal Highni.ss ?—Nu, otherwise I should have said.the same as now. . . • . • . Did any one talk With him at Paris on the subject of what be had to say?—No, I was there solew houri that I had hardly sufficient time to rest mvself,.for I travelled post. Was Witness never examined nn this subject before he set out from Messina to Milan ?—No. How long is it since he was in Paris?—Witness asked the Interpreter what day yesterday was, and was told Wednes day • he then said he was at Paris on Saturday in the last week. • Has witness been examined since he cattle to England ? Yes. , • . _ . Before he came to this House ?—Yei. Was he brought into this House before he•came - in as a witness ?—No. When was•he examined here?—Yesterday:. • • • Does he know the name of the Gentleman who examined him ?—No. You were pot sworn, I suppose, yesterday ?—No. Where has witness been since his arrival in London ? There where all the rest are. • All the rest of whom?—All the persons who were in a place that communicated with that House. • Who were they do not know ; I never had the curiosity to laurel them. I only attended to my Own business. How many werirthere of them ?—I do not know. Does he know whether there were ten, Or ten times ten ? Ten times ten is one hundred, if I understand arithmetic. I. would ask, if • in the 'place where he came from there are as many as six persons?—Whether .There are- six or not I do not know. 1 know no more than the Captain, Theodore, and the Cook. . Where was witness last night ?—ln his chamber. Who were with you ?—Witness named the persons he had just mentioned. 'He went on to describe the persons with whom be had taken tea or, the preceding evening. • Did you sup together afterwards?—No; - I took no supper last night. I only took tea. What day did you come over from Dieppe ?—The day I ar rived was Tuesday. On Monday I left Dieppe, and on Mon day ..night I landed at Brighton. . . Here the cross-examination closed. Mr. BROU GRAM thought it right to say, that what he said before Witls respect to the cross-examinations applied to this • witness as well as to the last. He wished the cross-examina tions not to be regarded as finally closed. • The Counsel for the Queen telt it necessary to reserve to themselves the right of calling them again, as from the course which had been pursued, the names of some of the witnesses they had 'never beard till now. The Lbw) CRANCEt.t.ott apprehended' when an application was,made to re-examine the witnesses, the House would de cide on the application according to the merits of the case. Mr. linon-onAm desired nothing beyond that, but he had thought it right to put in this general application, Vl:it none of their Lordships might go away, considering the examina tions to be finally closed. • Re-examined by the ATTORNEY-GENERAL. . _ What was the size of your ship ?—Two hundred and sixty nine tons. Is not the 800 dollars per month alluded to, paid for that ship not being employed by nay of demurrage Mr. Denman objected to the question. Ttie Lord Chancellor inquired if it ikere founded on the evidence. Mr. Gurney had Sent away his book, but repeated a former answer given by the witnes,, that he was to receive 800 dol lars per month for hii ship not being employed. Is that more than an adequate compensation for your com ing here ?—I want to know whether it is compensation for the ship or foi 4 my labour ? I ask, if 800 dollars per month is more than an adequate remuneration for the ship remaining unemployed ?—tight hundred dollars per month is not so much as the loss I may sustain. We reckon not so much on the hiring of the ship to car ry goods, as on trading on ,our own account. I du not know. I may lose or I may gain a great deal more. Taking these circumstances, into consideration, is it more than - au a dequate compensation?--I cannot tell; fiir if my spetulati6u succeeded; I might - gain ; if it failed, I might losa a great (teal more. , " By Earl Grey—l, wish to ask 'witness where hii ship now is ?—1 ieft, it at Messina. ~. , Was it, about to sail on another voyage ?—No. , Must it be miemiiliived in your absence ?—I db not know. . . ... _ , s . . Is it impOssible for it to he sent on another voyage in your absen•ce, ?--No. The other proprietors may send it out with another Captain, "hut then I lose my Inisitiess. Then I understand the BUM paid to be a codipensition for his absence , and n o t for his ship remaining unemployed 1-- For leaving my ship and neglecting my trade. ~ In answer to other questions witness stated, that in his ah sence he, as a proprietor of the ship, might receive his.share for the freight, but not of the profits of the trade. , . In the voyage to J a ffa, h o w man y o f th e crew were on deck at night?-0f the whole crew, orie.half watched for four henrS while the other half rested. . • . Then I understand that there were only ten or eleven on deck at night?—When the weather was bad all were on deck. ut serer leis than ten ?-I‘lever. Were these in the habit of4alking up and down the deck during the night ?--Excepting the at the helm and those who went below to look to the horses, they Walked the deck. Was there a passage to go by the ttnia--:-The tent occupied little more than half the breadth of the ship. Was there any passing by the side of the tent from one end' of-the ship to the other ?—On one side of the tent there was no passage as it came to theiide of --the ship. On the other • _there was a passagp. Were the men in the habit of passing the tent during the night ?—Whenever there was occasion to do some duty, they passed the tent, At other times they did not come aft. By the Marquis of Lansdown—The witness has said that the Captain occasionally ordered him to remove from the deck, when be and the Princess and Bergami Were On deck. Where did he then . go ?—According to where he -ordered me. Did he .oetter you to go below, or where?—Sometimes he ordered me to go to -the cabin and sometimes to the fore castle, to take care that the sailors did not make - a noise in the ship. -,At -the time when you Were ordered, tinder some pretence or other; to remove from that part -of the deck, where her Royal Highness andßergami were, were there other persops near her Royal Hig hness on that part of the deck ?—As soon as 1 we nt awayl did not know what passed. Were there other persons suffered to remain at the time you were sent away ?=Were any other persons left there ? At the moment, when I went away, something was ordered to me, and I could not pay attention to see who remained or went away. When her Royal Highness and 'Bergami were reclining, was the-weather calm or teMpestuouST—lf it had been stormy they could have - been- 013 deck. It was summer time and fine weather. Was the ship much tossed?-During summer there are only light airs, and hardly any tide to make any motion. The Weather was calm, and the ship Alid not move. Examined bN the Earl of ROSEBERRY. _ _ In the voyagc to Jaffa x Was there a communication from the tent to the ship helow,' or did it terminate in a place from which there was no e xit ?—I will describe it. 3Vill their Lordships have a plan of that part of the ship, or otthe cor ridor ? What-I want to know is, whether there was any comnittni: cation from the tent t hat went to any part of the ship, or whe ther•it terminated in' place front whence there was no exit —I ilia)] draw a plan, and explainit. The witness then drew a plan, which was shown to their Lordships. From the tent so' placed, was there any possibility.to get.to the dining roorta except by the tent?— , There was' another place Which I have marked a little higher. Could. any other persons see their position in the tnt? Yes; two or three.other people,because thatwas a time when part of the crew were on deck taking the fresh air, and other people might see if they chose. Do you recollect where Theodore Majocci slept ?—I-Ie had a place assigned to him and a hammock in the hold. When Theodore was in the place where be slept, could he possibly observe what passed in the teut ?—When he slept in the hold beloW he could not, as he must pass throbgh two decks. . . _ Did Theodore always sleep in the hold ?—I cannot tell. Examined by Lord ELLENBOROUGH, the LORD - CIiANCEiLOR and othei. Noble Peers. Where . did Bergami sleep • in the voyage from Jaffa ? There were two beds tinder the tent. and when the tent was open there was seen-a small bed, which was Bergami's. Had Bergami any other known place to sleep in, but under the tent ?—When - the Princess slept under the tent, I did not see them; but what I know, morally speaking, -is, that firobahly - the Princeis and Bergami must hare slept under the tent, becattsethere were horses-on board which made a' great noise, and' they said they could not bear to sleep below. Where, during the voyage from Jaffa, were the beds placed which the witness described in the voyage from Tunis ?-0o the sofa nothing -was left but one single mattress; the other mattresses were placed on the bed below as at the be ginning. You said that the cabin was divided into two, and that Ilergami's bed was in the dining room, I wish to lillow where the beds, and nut the, mattresses, were placed in th e voyage . . from Jaffa ?—The bed of the Princess remained where it was. As to.Bergami's, when he - got tip; it vas rolled' up, for it had no bedstead, but was put down on the planks of the corridor, and rolled up in the morning. Was there any alteration in the distribution of the cabin in the voyage from Jaffa, and will the witriea draw a plan ? The only alteration was. that Bergami's bed bud been put into the dining room. The witness then drew a plan, which .was also shown to the: House. Was Bergami's bed made every night during the voyage from Jaffa ?—As to this, I cannot tell what happened there not being eresent. Were there other persons in the place where Theodore Majocci slept ?-,Yes. Did Camera sleep there?-No; he slept in the cabin. How marry tents were there in-the journey to Jerusalem ? —I de not know. Many, several, as many as were sufficient for the number of.persons. Where did the chambermaids sleep in the voyage froth Jaffa ?—They-had a small cabin assigned to them, hut he never went below, and could not see whether they slept there. When the Princess slept under the tent, was the day light given through the lower passage. or any other ?-Sontetituts under the tent, and sometimes through the other passage. Who took the light away?,--Sometimes the maids, sometimes other persons, or the Captain himself, took it away. Do you know who gave the light • Did any other, person, during the voyage from Jaffa, sleep in the dining room ?—DO your Lordships 'speak of what I have seen with my own eyes ? Mr. Denmhn objected to a question so put. The Lord Chancellor stated, that when a question had been put by the House, the Counsel were allowed to suggest ,whe titer such a question was proper to he put; but it was then for the House to decide on the question of its propriety. He thought,in the present instance, that the Noble Peer should re -state his question. The question haring. been repeated—This I do net know; I do not remember. Did the Princess during the same voyage take off her clothe s or not ?—1 wish to distinguish between knowing and seeing. I know that the Prin cess and Ber g ami sle p t on deck, because ever y body said so. I have seen the - Princess in the morning o pen a little of the tent; I have seen her in a white gown, a d ress i ng gown, or some gown, open the tent to take a morsel of air in the morning before the sun rose. Did - you ever see Bergatni look'out of the tent at the same time?--No; the Princess opened the tent towards the sea, and open e d it a little, just enough 'to put herself out. Was there any direct. communication between the room of the Princess and that of .Countess Oldi ?—Yes ; you might pass from the room of Countess Oldi to that of the Queen. Mr. Denman here suggested the prOpriety of inquiring the name of the ship. What was the name of the SW 11?—!I Vero de Fidele. . To what port did she belong ?—To M,ssitia.• What is the name of the other owners of the ship ?--,la como Milanesi, alone. The Earl of Lauderdale—Could persons in th e dining room hear what passed under the tent ?—Y e s ; a person- con hear, piovided the words were pronounced with a certa force. M b e b a th, C the (led td U. at b e est. be led In 1 rc }sed rep? &LW ! W A I LIABILITY OF WITNESSES. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that before the House separated, he wished to state„that he had not failed in his duty in applying to . the highest sources' of information on the point how far pro secutions •might be supported against witnesses ex amined, in the course of .this proceeding. He understood, most unquestionably, that those pro secutions could be maintained ; but he had not put to the same sources any question as to the effect of the exercise of the privileges of the House, should it interpose to prevent the pro dUction of the necessary ev4ence. It was mato riaLthat the public mind shauld be satisfied upon this matter; and another point of importance was, that-in, endeavouring to . accomplish this purpose' the House should 'not lose sight of its :A. third conialeration -was, that, in any resolution named on 'this subject, it should not be 'implied thereby , thiat there would be any occasion to prnsect}te the witnesses...He purposed to-morrow to. move the. House.- to resolve, in ef fect, that if there shall be occasion for such pro secutions, the U6vse will suspend its pri v ileges, and dot:interpose prevent them; meaning, at the same, tirne,- tOrame that resolution in such terms as to answer all. the objects in : view. ,Adjourned.at five o'clock.. . THE QUEEN. Yesterday her MAJESTY'S state carriage drew up to her entrance door at the House of Lords soon After four o'clock, but the Queen remained in her apartment for nearly an hour longer. The entire line of return, from New Palace-yard to St. James's-square, was more or less 'occupied with vehicles of various kinds'cin eir!.er side of the carriage-road. Numbers of people were sta tioned on the footway; and even in the open street, and the windows were occupied by ladies and gentlemen their domestics and visitors. _ _ The crowd had in accuulatea so much about half after four, that the Horse Guards were' obliged to be active in keeping-the necessary space open for the 'passing and relia Ssing from Parliament square beyond the Horse 'Guards. Alderman. Wood, in his chaise, drove away from the , HouSe towards' St. james's-sgnare about a quarter past four, and was cheered as he' proceeded by the populace. It was abotit a quarter past five when the Queen's equipage got into St. ames'ssquare from George-street, soon after which her Ma jesty was handed. from 'her carriage by Mr. Al derman Wood. Owing to the chilliness:6f the day,' h e r majeqy's carriage Was closed up, 'which prevented her front being- seen till after - her ar rival. She, however, now made amends for this privation, by appearing at one of the Windows of her house, where she courtesied inacknowledg merit' of 'very loud and reiterated cheers. "Cha riots, - carts, waggons, - had previously .. been sta tioned at every'part of the square nearest her Majesty's house, and the owners 'of waggoi-6, auci carts. collected ,their sixpences in .abundance. Her Majesty soon reappeared at the •Window, acCompanied by Alder Man Wood, when - klie both courtesied and waved herhand to the people three times, and seemed - to utter - some few sentences, which it was impOssible to hear. Hundreds of persons were accommodated' within The en closed part of the square, whence the . y had full opportunities 'of beholding 'her 11'Tajesty.-- At precisely a quarter . before . six, the Bethnal green Deputation, with an Address to the Queen, reached . St. James's-Square, in thirty coaches, most of them open ones,.ivith four horseS to each. ' Nearly all the Deptitation were dressed in black, and wore white rosette's:. They, were 'cheered by the .populace still 'congregated in froni'of her Majesty's house: Shortly 'after this Deputation had withdrawn, -her Majesty came again to the window where she is Usually' seen;*and: bowed to the huzzaing spectators. She was diessr.l in blaCk silk, wore a white turban, with which' hung' from her 'forehead to nearly her waist. ' About a quarter Past seven o'clock,. her Majesty left St. JameS'S-square fur Brandenbufgh House, at Hammersmith. Alderman Wood presided yesterday at a:Ward Meeting of Cripplegdte, at which, of course, ,aa Address was voted to the Queen. • The Duke of York was loudly huzzaed from the House to the Horse Guards by a iarge.crowd. We have again the painful task of noticing the grosS depravity of the 'Mob in 'hissing the i Puke of Wellington ,and the Marquess' of An lesea. These distinguished heroes, to .Thom try owes so much, treated the rabble with:pro per contempt; Foreign and Colonial Trade, to Augyit 16, 1820.—Mr. POPE, of the Bristol Csntom ,louse, has published the Sixth Edition' of 'his "'Practi cal Abridgement of. the Laws or Customs and Excise," corrected to August 16, 1820. This Edition embtaces (besides miscellaneois platters) the whole of the R,egulations concerni,4:4 the Trade between Great Britain and all parth of the World, either as to the mode in which Goods may be Imported,Warehoused, Exported, or car ried Coastwise, or the quantum of Duties, Draw backs, Bounties, or Premiums, to be paid or al lowed. The infOr'ma.tion in Mr. P . oPr;'s Book cannot be acquired from - a9y,,:gflie . rxlibAieitiou whatever.—The new parts may be Ilad-separate , ly, price ls. 6d. i FATAL . 00CURAI;NCE.—A melancholy event took place at - Kilnhurst, near Rotherham, on Thursday morning, at the Pottery. ..of Joseph Hill and Sons. John' Depledge and Samuo Bradshaw had been employed in sinkinga well, for the purpose of . putting down a pump ! for a new dwelling-house ; which,. being finished, one of them descended to ascertain the depth„of Wa ter as he did not return, his companion went down after him ; he, likewise, did not - returm ; and, unforturrately,'„Joseph Hill, the prop,rietor, with his four sons, went down the. laddmin ,suc , cession ; the last was seen to drop olf : by,some persons who were standing near the mouth-of the well,. who immediately procured the assistance of some men from a neighbouring colliery ; but it required some precautionary preparations before they could 'be prevailed upon to go , downinto the well, which they at length did, and brought up the bodies of the seven Men, all dead. There were, it seems some okd Coal-pits close by. the spot, which had uot, : been' worked for - some time, and it is conjectured - that an - aperture bad b ee n made in digging the Well; which admitted the fatal damp, .and caused the - d e h:th : of those unfortunate nienin so instantaneous a iiiatineT. Mr. d ill, the father, was a widower, ..ao . 4 7 lhis.four sons were u nmarried; but Deptodge..i, iltadEiha*- have both left large families to - del3lae their'vntimely fate.