The Sun. — London, England, 1820-10-26 00:00:00

a V, r ogle s i n to L the petit; atilec n o . ), boil been been ,vas• C -q5 • n o' g- Ilig li ; ware re at' ) last"state4 issal t / then' It . • examination, nothing was elicited which could iil any way. tend to discredit what he had I, ) _efore st a t e d ; but lie stat e d new eircuinstttnces, lucll the shewed he . could not be ,mistaken on subject. He there ihewed that Sacchi i ' not gO forward w ith di s p a t c h e s, • because `ho had become chafed from ridin;, and could °t continue on horseback any further ; .and that tl)e wiines's, took his part, in which he .ac -9.4l.litted hi mse lf so much to the' satisfaction of her ° Yal Highness,. that lie was continued in her : f erv ic'e• It was h e , th ere f ore , cl e arly, wito - per- ! n ern kli the office of courier to her Royal...High-' T e t 's on that journey from Rome to Senegaglia. t its testim ony , i mpor ta n t as it was, was not: a te r"Pted to b e me t by an y contradiction on the I : 111 " side. , The witness had been subjected to active cross-examination, but that was all. = 1 ;n Dumont, who had such accurate informa- . San anti knowledge of every motion of. Mr., tier was -never asked if Sacchi rode as con sier °II that journey. And he (Mr. D.) most Sacchi contended, that all the evidence -which j ec ni gave, both from the nature or it, and "ill C ns ideration of the person it came from, should i t av e been corroborated from every direct source i i ras po ss ibl e to get evidence from. , ow,N th lt " respect -to th e e vidence . of Carlo Forti, let 1 . 013 " 1 look at what Captain Hownarn said in cor o ia °ra tion•- hi page 704, he says, that iiistead ve c i "e carriag e in which her Royal Highness tra p , e d) it was not of. the description represented curtains to the windows, which , v• r uid be opened. from.the outside, the, carriage t° an English .landaulet, having spring blinds '"e windows, which could only be opened, by ti Person on the i n side. And he at the same a v h ill `' mentioned a variety of circumstances to I :" 'hew that his memory is fully compete e nt Perfect description of the case. He must ti rt , l‘ : s ; -ate, thetas to there being any doubt about anc ;`). l te had b u t to state :that there was- only b r ' t Pttraey f ro m Rome to Senegaglia.performed • ter Ito,yal Highness. The Learned Counsel a v h - ,:'l . _° l l endinerate the different . witnesses t ar :, 'ad given their evidence in . c(yrroboration of e am : ° Porti ; and-detailed the, evidence.given by th;' to that effect. 'He. referred particularly-to lt a - s te stimony of Colonel Olivieri and Count li a -,;:' 11 ; so that. it appeared this Sacchi swore to f r ` o 'ng witnessed a . most iudecent scene,. which, )1a,.1 1) e nature of it, it was even impossible could „., • ot t "aPpened he detected the parties in it the highway, drawing aside the curtains of to carriai.se in Which they travelled in order teo ti° so; and yet he did not know who was lii.•'es in the carriage. He was contradicted ila „ . i e. person w hti actually rode as .courier, di gi t ! (1 - of him, on that journey ; he was contra taupe;. hy, the probability of there - being only one to t) i! on that Occasion ; and he was, in short, e. rit tliCted. by 'four credible witnesses, viz.' Ol Ptai t ' • ownain, VasSali, Forti, and . Colonel tl ia "-' n rl: It wa s deserving of particular remark, b y t the story of Sacchi had not been confirmed s ingle witness, not even by Dumont; and it lau t "lt been attempted .on the opposite side, to It ) e • any contradiction .to the_witn-ess-da who had ta t - h ° ThPletely refuted it. Wds it pOssible that 'ti es a.story: cou ld b e cre dit e d, when the very cr Ption o f it Was calculated to put every ho s,-oa ra ble mind on its guard? When they had auli e 'even farther than that, and shown that it • fail a bsolutely false ; and if that story was what become of the whole of his eyi= 14 i ;• What., became of those stories about of 'incess and 13ergarni's conversations ; and bp s :' n 'at iMproper conduct of her Royal High at. th e Birona, which was supposed to have Ivie,"ted nitmerous persons of rank who were Ita ti . s -es ses of it ? And why were none of these per called ? 'it next appeared that her Royal l'ir t ,',, ne ss had related to. Dumont, that she ,(tile 4 Ea Royal of this country) had been rejected 4 rti,, '" , t et nber of the Casseno, at. Milan. Setting ttl improbability 'of a - person of her exalt it - -4 K refused such an honour, whether , tio n as t .. S O or not, still there was a . different solu 'Rive."' it, if true, than that attempted to be th,, t „ ° it. It was known that she was the wife ka o „:" Prince Regent 'of this kingdom ; it was t!)cii,•," that she wits his persecuted, condemned, ,te- a ` L wife--a wanderer on the face of the earth, tail ' ) e she had no home in that country which 4efa:ec°me her. own—because those' who had •ta c C carried her triumphantly through the at . Nak s s °I her enemies; were now, ranged in their tilkt and it was 'from these circumstances S nclt might be drawn a diffe.nent reason for occurrence than. it. proceeded from any vq• so ` el t disapprobation of this Illustrious f j t n s conduct." He . passed over that host 'itip r : h "att witnesses, together with the host of thei n -41) le and insignificant facts sworn to by fin , . i next adverted to the story -,ahout l'iheth' llr es- of Ad am and. Eve, :and he asked o ilst„ er any Man could look at that explod disatt,;"Y . uow, without redoubled' feelings .of Ile ? l , 4 ;`'"t at th e .t a le itself, but at the charge ? tail t , notstate the fact; but he would merely \v as their Lordships' minds- that .Porni, who tt aequainted with the premises, had said, that w as . had d p " n llossible..Raggazoni• cciuld.see,whal he li ; se i ribed from the situation he stated him -1),'01.-lai 13 , e i n• Raggazoni's- statement was-- dis ("saw ;.. is °'-hy 'the plan itself which had been 1° I °` th e Had any contradiction wh at premises.. i s ," l : 'ati been proved by her Majesty's Coun -clgaz;'l'sPoint been offere ' d ? None : and when ,: )n otiad been -brought forward .as a. wit \ras %/ lul respect to tile Grotto, he. thought it Vrod('-sential that a plan s of that place shmild be Z it ' ll a s Used ' He l a i l e s ' o knew that plans had been taken P 1 4 4 ,` ) ,! . , al been done of every place which highness had ever visited, and he . 1 ,; ( li tie to kno w why a plan .of thi s -place had , IV 4B een prod uce d ? B ut i t a ppeare d that it 1 Ira Possiole that Raggazoni could see what Pretended to describe. He ,would not It 'iss • "Y longer on this subject, but would .dis b., w i qs, ll th a. remark, that it served to shp.w what eSS ( - n e w *h eat could, he made capable of, by a due Part i 3a 4) n of adequate inducenients.,ln.another. " hi ) s — " Raggazoni stated a circumstance eel ' by him one night, when, as it W,as called, there was to be a house-Warming, dtd the gardens =were illuminated. On this occasion, Raggazoni and l3ruza swore .to having seen her Royal highness and Bergami sitting on the same seat in the. garden. And what, he. asked, was to be obtained from that fact? Raggazoni swo:'e that it was at this Arne, two o'clock in the Morn ing ; but when • Bruza is called, his Learned Friendi recollect that Italian time differed from Englishtirne, and ._then it coMes oat that it was on l y half-paSt nine in the evening, instead of two o'clock _in • the morning, when this scene took place—at that time. when ,an Italian peasant chooses, above all others, to .enjoy himself in in nocent relaxation;,—at that time Whe4i he is most in motion ; and as it appeared-that the gardenS were illuminated, and full of, low company, as his :Learned ,Friends had called them, moving backwards and forwards, he could not see that such a moment could have been chosen for any improper intercourse or fa minority. He then touched upon the evidence of ' Antonio "Bianchi, .page 397, respecting the bathing of her Royal Highness and Bergami in the river Brescia. It appeared that these par ties.took.a boat and .went upon the lake„ :where they were in the water together, when they espied him and four Gentlemen coming 7 —upon which they ran away, got into their boat, and sailed down the river, he supposed to the Lake of Como.—Now, it so happened that 'this river Brescia Was a cata ract, which was either quite dry, or was a torrent admitting of 'no navigation by . any boat. This they had . upon the testimony of_Captain Hownam, page 973. This 'fact showed the unparalleled impudence of the deponents in. coming forward with such sforks to insult the English public.— The story was a good One:in itself, and look ed very well upon paper, • until it appeared that the 'place fixed on as the scene of action was such as it 'was neither possible • to bathe in, nor to sail a,boak. 'Why, he asked, if, there were four persons who' witnessed this, was there only asingle one called.? Atiother,wit ness had sworn, that in taking the Princess and Bergami to Como, he • saw them kissing no less than four times waS.eVen oftenerthan Ma jocci and Dumont had sworn to have .seen it in three years; but 'the boatman . he called, who had the best opportunity of observing 'the con , duct of the „parties; gives a direct contradiction to 'the statement. TheSe , might appear trifling; ~ b circumstancesut'theY were important:—false hood had been grafted onAruth, so that profli- - gateminds saw notiiinff.bUt culpability in the conduct of her Royal. Highness. When we dis cover falsehood,' we 'must look to the motives 'whichhave prompted it; and the evidence'of the witnesses against the Queen, unsupported as they have been by collateraFteStimony, is not entitled to the slightest credit. Sacchi has sivorn that he assumed the name; of Count Milani in conse quence of the Dover, tiots, and yet lie in proved to hov , e, gone by that name twelve months before they occurred; ,and whenno one dreamed of the present trial but those Who Were collecting the materials for it. He next came to that impor tant' name of fiastelli, whiCh brought him - to the Milan Commission, of Which he was such an active agent. And before he proceeded further, he 'wished to be ,understood as to the light in which he viewed that Commission, of which their: Lordships , had. heard a great deal. At the head of the Commission was 'Mr. Cooke, a gentleman of whom he had heard nothing but what gave him allisposition to respect him, until he , accepted the oilice ,which this Commission imposed upon hiM. He. was a great lawyer, a man of great scientific research, and possessing great weight and Authority in all points of legal doubt, But he must confess that of all the names he had ever heard of in Westminster Hall, he looked upon Air. Cooke as the ,last man who was qualified for an oflite•Of thenature he had under taken. He thought there never was any one whose habits of mind were less qualified for the office of sifting evidence, or fOr dete4ing falsehood in a wil ling witness, or of checking those under him from overstraining their duties. As to Col. Brown, it could be no offence to . say that,. as he was a military man, he - could• hardly be expected to give any useful assistance:' The only real and efficient C o mmissioner_was My. Powell; now -the Solicitor to this prosecution; it was he who had been able to het evidence, by the compulsory power,which he ,possessed Brown using his influence with the Foreign Courts to assist him. This. was ,the i ,first instance he , .eyerheard of an Attorney forming the sole Commissioner. (Mr. Denman) was not sorry that Mr. Cooke had accepted the , office. .tor. was he displeased that _My. Powell had been the most active. Em-, ploying Rastc:ili as a. courier to this‘Commission, _was enough .to disqualify him as a witness ; but when the advantage was considered; which he most expect 'from being. employed to obtain evidence, would any one say he ought to have been a_ witness ? The character of the Courier and the witnesses4mght to have been kept sepa rate. Mr.. Powell possessed great advantages in Rastelli'sknowledge of the witnesses.:lt was the object. of Rastelli to beat up for, recruits, not only to support his own testimony, but 'to ruin his Royal : Mistress—an object . his whole soul 'seems to have bees engaged in. He had said that he .never offered money tctAny witness, but that assertion was, also refitted. .• But the most taut fact connected :with Rastelli was,. that he, a witness who had • stated the most.,infamous fact with which the Princess was charged :—that he, the agent, courier„ and clerk of the Milan Corn-, mission;—that he, whose testimony haiklain him so completely open to a prosecution for perjury, which would have been instituted.; that he, af ter- thus .pick bolster l s t up e r a, pledge given , that, no -witnesses should be t t i c ; withdrawn, had.been sent to new facts; suborn ,new .witnesses, I\l a ii r a ld n up a case, which,the, prosecutors found had. com pletely failed. It had been admitted, that the not being able to examine, this man at the time he was called was an irreparable injury to, her Majesty. But he had disappeared, had been sent away on the 14th of. September, and now it, wag the 25th of Ostober, and there was 'no pro bable - conjecture as to the time of his return, The Counsel for her Majesty hail much plain of, ,and it required all the good character which some persons boasted"of, to shield them frotU censure for such an act.' If fta.stelli could have been examined when called, it would not have bepn, known but that he had, been in Cot ton-garden all the time ; hut he was fled, and the object for which he had fled could not be doubtful—it was to evade justice himself, and to pervert justice, in procuring more false testimony against that much-injured and Illustrious Lady,. the Queen . of England. _ The Learned Counsel now retired. for a short time.—At the end of _half an hour, Mr. DIiN.MIN returned to the Bar, and resumed. lle had been most anxious to' comment upon every fact. which had been given in evidence against her Majesty, and to - explainvery circum stance which might have appeared to her disad vantage. Dining his absence, he had looked over the evidence, to see if there was any point which he had left untouched, and there was one part in which lie thought it necessary to Offer some elu cidation, lest their Lordships should form mist - a: ken. notions -Upon the subject. He alluded to the statement given in evidence, that her Majesty had play e d several characters at a Theatre at the Villa d'Este. It was said, that her Majesty, played -Columbine, and That Louis Begami played Harlequin. He had only one observation .to make upon this point, and that was, that the characters of Harletittin and Columbine, as played in Italy, Were widely differe4 from those played in England. , In England, as their Lord- . 'ships knew, the Harlequin' and CohiMbine were lovers ; hut In Italy they were not so represented on the stage. They were speaking parts in Italy ; in England they were not. ,In Italy, the Haile— quirt, which in that country was. called Haqe • quino, was generally the valet of the loVer in, the Harlequinade ; and the Columbine, which was called Busara, was the 'servant of the female. There was no love affair; and no freedonts - what. ever,passing between them. ''He would here ad init that there might be too great a disposition. her Majesty' to enjoy the innocent pleasnies of life 'with those by whom, she was surrounded; but it was only *her 'wish to make all around her cheerful ,and happy ; and although he admitted . this farniliar intercourse of her Majesty with her suite, 'fie Contended' that she had never, "by any a t, lost that title to respect and deference, .not Only from her servants,,butwhich all honest men ever woultfpay to a, female of her exalted 'rank, posseSsing her Manifold With respect to the Milan Cot - mission, his Learned Friend' (Mr. Brougham) had not chargedit . 'with a conspiracy to sUborn witnesses ; but•he had said, that sup posing such 'a cohsPirady to exist, it would ex hibit all . the synipteins and indications which arose from'. the acts.'of that Commission. They were not bound to Charge particular' individuals, but if they showed that all that had been done could only be accounted for in 'the light of a conspiracy, they - had 'Made a better case against those who prosecuted her Majesty, than thOse , prosecutors thethselves had 'been able to fa,- hricate, though armed with Unbounded resources and unlimited power. How'had 'the witnesses for the prosecution come over to thii country Had they come as volunteers' without reward, without purse or scrip, with no shoes on their feet, and no coats on their baek, butout'of a ter- der regard for the dignity of the English Throne,' and the moral interest Of the population-of thiS great Empire ? The moral interest of that population, it would have been far better consulted by h‘dif-' ferent course. - whatever might - he the effect produced - hereafter by that which had been adopt- ' ed, no doubt could 'possibly be entertained' of. its mischievoni 'and 'fatal tendency now; for the most innocent lransactions - Of -life, polluted by Calumny,'had - been ‘miked tfif and involved with the most 'atrocious' crimes ;, and even' if it had been proired- that' the' Illustrious Defendant was guilty, there might be lurking in 'the minds of the Public that dangerous casuistry, which was ever ready . to set tip the vices of one party as a counterbalance to •those of the other; and which, in his opinion, Airits'productiv6 of the, most ileplorable consequences to "the moraf cha racter of the nation. 'This was'only in. case the facts were proved ; but "they were not proved, and it would be shown that they had' arisen from the evidence of such individuals as were 'entitled to no credit. Was it necessary to say ally thing more on the evidence of Rastelli'than had been said, that infamous character, who had been in thedouble character of witness and collector, of witnesses, with Dumont and Sacchi ? lie would add but a few words upon the 'fact of Rastelli having been sent away from the country. In page 811, Mr. Powell said that, he sent him on a mission. to Milan as a courier and he recom-. mended him for that Service at 'the • Foreign Office: He afterwards stated at large the gotunds, for sending - away Rastelli. He said, when he Was first' examined, that it was necessary that some per Son should he sent to the families of the per sons ill-treated at Dover, to assure them of :their • relations' safety. It was necessary that they should_be'assitred, that other witnesses might not be prevented from coming over. Why was Ras telli sent on this mission ? That question was put to . Powell, and he replied that Eastern had brought them over; he kneNVAlieni, and could give satisfactory assurances to theiy families: It was also sworn by Mr. Powell„thal the witnesses Wrote letters ; could not.tben Wife Other person have been the bearer Ortbem to Italy, for the. re latives of the witnesses could 'net have doubted their hand-writing. ._Whapt did Rastelli,in his evidence, in page 413, say, when he brought asked — cc Who were . the persons whom "he over as witnesses ,agairis't the Queen; and if he' knew them ?"—" I know nothing of . them,, e ,i c qt by . bringing them over.;„ some •t know, s o me do , not know, and those T, -kno*, I only know by sight." Then why . was - Kasten; sent to persons that he did not know, if there had not been Other motives for se n di ng hi m a way ? In the. same page Rastelli Was asked, 4 - 4 What are the names of tbe . per' sOiis that you know win) came over to England -- iriih:yon?" he gave the names of four persons ; but not one of ' those persons had. been called, as witnesses in this case,- Any. of them might therefore have been. dispatched .to quiet the families at Milan,..with out any prejudice to the interests of the trial, for all of thein:Were at liberty: Mr7l-lowell had de clared he had every.reason to believe that Itastelli Would' be 'sent back, as - directions had been sent to . hasten .his return. It was remarkable to obseri , e,, that such was- this Gentleman's confidence in these directions, he thought they would cure hint (itastelli) of his fever, would restore -him to the strength which his illness had taken away,- and in. short be so efficacious as to 'enable him to take Up • his bed and walk. It was . true, bowever, as ap peared from his letter, that Col. Brown supposed Hasten' . alight be shuffling ;, that he was utty, filling to return to England; that he assumed . . salon to avoid that course ; 'that he had hearil, though the, pillory was abolished in this country- for other offences, it still existed.for perjury. Col. Brown (here the Qetitleman read extracts from his letters produced - to the Secret Commit- • tee and .- given in their report)—Colonel Brown stated. that the. feier spittirig : _of and the • unwillingness to 'rettife, would render that, event'a matter of great difficulty ; and yet •31r. Powell, on the 13th of .October, had told them that lie had even reason to believe Itastelli would be soon in' England. Elsewhere in his evidence, he said he had nowentertained an idea • of his being •wanted : why, then, had he pressed •• his being sent. bUck: so 'strongly ? -why was it that •on the . : 3d of October he 'had declared he would not have consented 'to his. removal but in expectation of ,his returning in time ? Ile (Mr. Denman) contended, that. some-'other I - messenger . might have been found;' Cut Mr.. Powell had further stated, that ltastelli. .was employed to get certain papers legalized to • Witt • - produce here ;he could hot conceive at papers these could be, but he' took it for granted that the fact was so. Anti it seemed that for these reasons •Col. Brown's letter was to be looked 'upon as confidential ; ag a communication with an agent which ought ,to be protected from all inquiry. But perhaps another ground.. for the employment 'of Itastelli was to be gathered from , 'a letter of a later date; for in addition to, these statements it appeared by a document, dated Lin .cola's Inn, 13th Sept.,Abat kastelli was returned • • to Col. Brown, as he might be of .Use to him (the' active Commissioner of the Milan Commis- • sion), but he Was required ,to take - Care to send him back with all the information lie could collect. All these thingS Otis came out by de- - . grecs... Ile did' not mean'to that Mr. ro - 1 . 1 - 611 had been incorrect; but he would, : , say that if on the Other side a ,gallant witness,: ove'r come by the, novelty of his ,situationy art 'unused , 'to these difficulties, had - done the game, • such murmurs as, had - Marked. „the testiniony . of Lieutenant Flynn would have been heard, and the'oNnion'of his prevarication false hood - would .haye , been vi - id.ely 'spread abroad: This liadobeen dinie by a daily "Newspaper : and . • the Journal mistaking the: eXpression . of surprise with which Martini had repelled the notion of her husband's having been a bankrupt, for a confession of that fact after she de'clare4 he • was not embarrassed, misled the ptiblic Mind by - its comMents . on the supposed contradiction. These things in themselves Were not important in the (*ILSE', but thry_werp worthy of attention, as skew-.- " pg; for the first; titne; the English ... I'll's§ taking- part ,against Vie ,a,Consed, and turning .the very , evidettee:of innocence into its reproach.---{To cr y ‘ 4 lVliat Paper'" froth - several Peers, Mr, mums, and , uthers,.as,.tltt; I st.possihie witnesses that could be amuse powers possessed -by the .Itl ila tt Qoinntission (of the na ture of which they wercyct -i7nOratit) no. individual more un fi t, to limit out the troth eolthib: foundthan Rastelli.. tient that person came with his new recruits, with his new regiment of C 4 spies and perjurers, his . lahours 'would, be ineffectual. Rut they (the Queen's Counsel) had been assured, that a large-al lowance would be granted on accountof Ihe uVasence of this individual. No allowance could place them in the situation they. would have reached had he been forthcoming. • The im pression through . his means had gone ,forth it. was . on the minds of• then,- and molting could. erase the impressi.m.— .:What other. corepensatiou then could they-hove ?, . Would Iluelr - Lordsluips strike 'nit part of the evidence of other,Wit ne.sses ? Of Raf4azoni? he was-gone already. Of Mtioni? his • testimony was d'estruiveth•Of the mason-, with hi s Maus and• Ere and the figsYeaves? he was, finishedbcfine.:ln sttort,,if. theywere permitted to take a•compensat of . this sort, there •• ' W4HI Id- be • the utmost so entirely-had the evidetlee for the charge been 'annihilated, to find an) , thing-,,werrtlly of heing . •strock not.: The Learned Gentlemitn next took op, the evidence of the OtteenN witness, Filipp<i Pomi, which:he de scrihed • as fliroWing ,a trite light upon all the 'machinery of the Milani •Commissitm. Pouni shewed thenr. the manner in which Itastelii • - asked him to , become a 'witness agaittst the Princess; and, rio doubt, hetook the same means wip tit bets.. Rut to his • invitation to aecuse his itoyal ist rest ,2Poosi re plica that he had never'seen anything in her conduct that seas in the slightest degree blameable ; he had 'stets nothing butt beneficence and kindness; nothing butwhat.fiecloutudest to her honour; and his gym it ode 'Was not to he overcome; . so as to render him it witness against her. This •made n.o dif ference toitastelii—neV'er mind., says be, Dinsiont.(tylro wayi concealed her haring . been dismissed from. serviee)...4-Ou moot has Haase well, • She•has matle a good day's worlouf it , do yarn follow her exautirple , , and you shall .get a great pr.esuent for deposing tiv the thtists. you most 'have. : :S'een,' fns was a bail' litihse, with hatr(vouten•in„ it. faithful servant; • • howeVist; denied this ; 'rind 114 only-brought the transaction forwartPto infee.that •prorniles'were made e)se.where, and to say that - 6'er) Itnul6' the sanction fief -the . Austrian Go vernment, such ..ineaittreS- :were: taken 16 ..idstala....witnesses ij gainsrtiie 'ltigaist•i• was another turfriesactive 7 agents of this tini 4 ; and •withfidl this, seas: it At-it - remarkable. that they (('ounsel).- had daStinfeit two of 'these indiViihrids.':: Ras. t of;, w ho beeri4thr :sad Vgaudi- Whom the oppo site side had alit dared to eall to Cott . k:thet swore to his having told lilin:whers-tre . saistZg'Yon have stsn Rergami lift tieV"updit het . a . 4,.rrh ! risht' ItWhand tinder ')ier pett Coats," twit' it' Was ; , a .srhl--ftstit . 'ernfl, for 14.ervinsi.d-roil• al ways tteattalllie Princess' with : One respect. ::'Tht next , wit-• ness to whom •Shoulli attention - . iSitis'.'othe who; lie so igla nut entitled to credit', Ple'lt - n.. - 411t‘P.,..ti, • the clerk of torlazzi. It Was true lie had cO'a'ressed himself ginity' of , ,nett erroir, 'tint in coot- l iar - Isms witfu'siante of the witue , :e's on-the ,ether Side.'he'was purity. - h7l;l.•Ftsitsinted —he hail toe'n ill -4 paidi.:Land (Sir. P.) wishrtlitiat'Atre wit neSses on t fie'othere side Wild repented tom T'POrnati . ; qtictu as he. ‘ VI iS, stated that he tiad been seamed by a liiittielut-oui he did dot' I; now to commit . a - breach of trust, audshievtl , :tt StraCtcd'th - e fin Betraying employer. to the%• - fituottiitilif 3( 0 4r 4 ."!) papers tnnfiiled to his c ire, was pailt , :trylthsilcarti altoiether tilil:Poivn •to them. - ,"ctiey \trit#t.' 4111V . 1 - ect.• iv they (me, proved that -thlangle they instructions from Colonel 13roWn ; fraAcs. Ws this d d s en ,h T d l iz ? him s s,,txtitotiatiCitti bttor,,t, t i lir it ' t t i ',it to slims that Pomati was called, Vtilam, ,atr#l.,turn • ;ea tint of the 'house, it } - et prover)' - that . was t faieV sifts . not truth in his haiihrs, visited Colonel Brown . 1-d.-• . (y.t. the ali ..L.i,..:ttrene,„af .cc,o,LlTeeli AttotaeY, and-Collectln of witnesses. ttir•n_proVei•ded to. l i t t i l a:Pa c c v t e c i' f e t ati's slime r continent on the impinlyability of Lietit.' HaWatsuo, whit tVISk the prbietz , „f .1;,„ r Royal tiions§ . , prestimitig' to !.;is...ikte.'r ad vice . if he had declared this to eartiiinl3ftga.s,:i , ,t*AElmk ev Ja U ~ti esta there ?eat' aier e / twe en lila it °nage