The Sun. — London, England, 1842-08-05 00:00:00

THE FOURTH VOLUME OF M D ,Ciff 15 "Ailli Lit DIARY AND LETTERS. IS NOW READY, emhel!ished with a Portrait of Mrs. De , lany, from ilia original at Hampton Court. .* Orders received by all Booksellers. Henry Colburn, Publisher, 13, Great 11Iarlborough-street. ITNRIVALLED DISTRIBUTION !-8,200 .) MONEY .DIVIDENDS will be divided on 30th No vember next, amongst 8,200 selected Bonds of the Loan nego• Mated in the year 1820, and guarantled by the Government a n d his Royal Highness the GRAND MIKE of BADEN. Distputigg at Carlsruhe, the nitropolis of Baden, on 30th November irkt. I Dividend 50,000 Florins 1' do." 25,000 " 1 do. 12,000 " 1 do. 10,000 " do. 5,000 " 8 do. 1,000 " 10 do. 500 " . 10. do. 200 " 200 do. 110 " 200 do. 10.5 " 467 do. . 100 " 7,300 do. 94 " B,2oo . Money Dividends, amounting to 892,900 Florins, or 74/ 400/. Stealing Money. , 50,000 Flor.ins 25,000 " 12 000 14000 " 5,000 " 8,000 " 5,000 " 2,000 22,000 " 21,000 " 46,700 686,299 " 8,2Q0 •cleated Bonds, each of which obains one of the above Dividends. • - Largest Dividend £4,166 13 4 Smal'est Dividend £ 7 16 8 12 firms equal to £1 sterling, a trifle more or less, as per the day's exchange. All the Dividends payable with.aut any deduction whatever. Direct for the few Bonds which are still oa tale, WITHOUT DELAY, to HEINE BROTHERS at HAMBURGH. Bonds arc ou sale now at £l3 10s. After liitk August, if not earlier, a higher rate will be established, since the stock does not sufrice Tor the orders. '1 hose who remit £l5 before a rise in price will have bevn esiablished, will receive an order for the surplus of £2 lOs., together with a warranted SELECTED Bond. To those whore order rezelies us too late for being attended to, their remittance will be returned by first post. i7EINE BROTH ERS. Hainburgh, 26th July, 1-842. THEATRE-ROYAL ENGLISH OPERA-HOUSE. THIS EVENING, A.UGUST 5. Will be presented LOST AND WONg—Leyton, Mr. Diddear ; Cattorail, r. W. lat. Blaisd •' Mistress Leyron, Miss Fauc.t. • After which, THE ILLosTitious SIRANGEIL—BowbeII, Mr. Harley; Azar, Mr. Barcer ; Niza, M s. Hughes. - n4 be fr , llonttd by the Musical Play of THE EXILE Pawn Al. tradort, Mr. J. Bland; Count Calmar, Mr. r arker ; Petroff Servitz, Mr. Harley; Daran, Mr. J. Vining ; Alexina, Miss Faucit ; Cathe. risk, Miss Murray atinclude with the New Burlesque %allet, called G IIIZELLE! (liar:Wets by Signor Oxberrini and Madlle. Louisotta Fah - bro. fir 11. 4a. Pit; `.;Zs.- Gallery, Is. Doors oven at Half-past Six; cominerfee at Fovea; Half-prise, a Quarter before Nine. Private Boxes to be had of Mr. Grogal, at the Priliate Box-office; and of Mewls. Andrews, Mitchell, Sams, and Bally, at their Libraries. ROYAL SURREY THEATRE. THIS EVENING, AUGUST 5. Will be rsTrrsented Bishop's Opera of GUY M NNERING Henry Bertram, Mr W. Harrison; Julia Mannering, Miss Romer; Lucy Bertram, Mrs. Serle. After which, THE QUAKER.—Steady, Mr. Leffler. To conclude with THE ARTFUL DOuGE.—Demosthenes Dodge, Mr. €l.. Wild. Places and Private 3oxee may be had of Mr. J. Kerschner, at the Lori. Ottice, frop Eleven till Four daily. ROYAL SURREY ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS. The Nobility, Gentry, Subscribers, and the Public,' are respectfully informed that ON MONDAYS, TUESDAYS, AND THURSDAY', GRAND EVENING -FETES will be given, in which will he em. bodied all those popular Entertainments that have given to this favou rite place ef recreation its peculiar celebrity, with additions and in trodlistions' which render them snore generally attractive. The MENAGERIE has been enriched by many valuable and im. portant acquisitions in the classes of both Quadrupeds and Birds. Feeding Time Five o'clock. The i:olowal VIEW OF ROME has been repainted, and in some instances remodelled, with a Mechanical Tableau d'action ' repre senting the Procession of the Papal Troops, Guards, and Roman Nobles, to the Castle of St. Angelo. The. BAND includes some of the most eminent Performers, con flated by Mr. Godfrey, and the Programme of the PROMENADES usle ALES seleetedf !Inn the noblest iprks of the great Masters. The I LLU MINATION4 ST. PETER'S, the CROSS of FIRE, and the GIR AN DOLA 6f Si'. ANGELO, with all the gorgeous Spectacles and magnificent introductions that have called forth ac chEnmations of delight and admiration on each evening of their ex. hibition, terminating with the triumph of pyrotechnic splendour, the CASCADE of BRILLIANT FIR F., SIX t Y FEET in height. The Gardens are open Daily from Ten till Dusk. The Evening Fetes, with the Promenades Musicales, Illumination of St. Peter's, Gisandolo of St. Angelo, Rec., will be given on Mondays, Tuesdays, an n. Thursdays. Admission One Shilling. raD . CORRESPONDENTS. Phanogen's paper is left in the office for him. The communication from Birmingham reached us, but a press of matter compelled us to postpone inserting it. 4 - "-"Af...3 . v....N-` , ..N.Y..t . ' •, ~ —, 10 ; , s " ", - fr''' 7, ` ' 4 llr icAlt!" -- 74 - .' '. • ~.. --, -, ar 1‘ ..7 , 'O , - i ,, , ,- , 9' '• 4 7 T ,i 0 , _.., ,' ~`''' . 0 ~:,. Atyi• ~? f >;• • Ziht LONDON: FRIDAY MORNING, AUGUST 5, 1842. The Corn-law Returns, published yesterday, show an average price of wheat for the six weeks of 645. 7d., which makes the duty still Bs. Already, however, the returns begin to feel the influence of the weather, and the average price of the week end ing bhe 30th of July was 635. 9d., being ls. 7d. less than the average price of the week ending the 23d of July. No further rise in average prices can, there fore, be looked for, and the holders of wheat must now decide whether they will introduce it at an Bs. duty .or hold it over, with a chance of not being able to in troduce it, unless by paying a much higher rate of duty, for two or three years. We presume that they will decide on blearing a considerable quantity at the present rate of duty, and thus, under Sir R. PEEL'S Bill, the great importation of this year will be at the sum proposed by the Whigs as a fixed duty. These was en expectation that the average prices would reach a much higher figure, and wheat be im ported at a nominal duty. If Sir R.° PEEL's Bill have prevented this without adding a grain to our supply, which we believe no person will assert, then its effect will be merely to enrich the Government, and impoverish the corn-dealers to the whole amount of the duty. It will have, however, to share the merit of this with the fine weather and the early harvest. COURT CIRCULAR. ~Vixnson Tilt] RSDA Y.—The Queen, and Prince Albert, and the Hereditary Prince and Princess of Saxe Cebourg Gotha enjoyed their accustomed walk in the forenoon, and the Prince of Wales and the Princess Royal were taken out as usual. The Queen Dowager attended Divine Service this morning, in St. George's Ci.apel Royal. The Countess of Sheffield and the Honourable William Ashley, were in Waiting on her Majesty. The Bev. W. C. Knyvett officiated. In the after noon the Queen, the Queen Dowager, the Duchess of Kent. and the Princess of Saxe Coburg', in one carriage, left the %tale for a drive in the Great Park and the Forest drives, 714r)wed by the Viscountess Jocelyn, the Countess of Sheffield, and the Maids of Honnur in another carriage; Prince Albert, the Prince of Saxe Coburg, Earl of Aberdeen, Lord Jocelyn, Colonel Wylde, and Captain Hood riding on horseback. Her Royal highness the Duchess of Kent, L a dy Charlotte Dundas, Lord and Lady Haddo, and Hon. Henry and Mrs. Ashley, will join the Royal Dinner party this evening. His Royal Highness the Duke of Cambridge arrived at Cainbridge Uouse on Wednesday evening from his reside Lee at Kew. HT Royal Higlinei.s returned to Kew yesterday. Captain Allen had al interview with Lord Stanley, yester day, at the Cotodial-office. Dehany, Solicitor to the Excise, had an interview with the Chancellor of the Exchequer, yesterday, at his official re sidence, in Downing-street. The Brazilian Minister transacted business, yesterday, at the Izoi oign -office. Air. Walker had an • interview with Lord Stanley, at the Co lonial-office, yesterday. EXTRAORDINART CASZ.—Wednesday afternoon, an inquest was held at the Rose, Snows-fiefs, Bermondsey, before Mr.• Carter, Coroner for Surrey, on view of the body of Charles Wilkins, 32 years of age, lately re biding .No. :18, Snows-tields, and following the occupation of a waterman, who committed suicide under the following circumstances ;—lt appeared by the evidence of" several witnesses that the deceased and his wife „h a d latterly lived very . uncomfortably together, frequently having quarrels in consequence of his suspecting her of carrying on an impro per intimacy with one of his brothers, and that he bad T ,•peateillv, in the presence -of the witnesses, charged her with infidelity. On the 26th ult, the w if e went d own to Gravesend, ostensibly fin. the benefit of her health, accom panitA by three Children, her nephew; , , where she took last the deceas e d w 6 nt d own to see lodgings. On Sunday her, and on his return home, about ten o'clock at night, he appeared to be much distressed in his mind, and then stated to his landlord that he had been down to Gravesend and had discovered that his brother was staying with his wife, and that he was much disturbed at it; that he had twine thought he would throw himself from the steamer into the river on his way up to London. On Monday af ternoon, he came home -to his dinner, and afterwards hifiloWil on his bA, and requested his mother-in law to bring him his tea at five o'clock. On her going into his room at that hour for the purpose, she discovered him hanging, from the top rail of his bedstead, suspended by a ' silk handkerchief. She im mediately gave an alarm, and assistance being pro cured, he was cut down, and medical aid from Guy's Hospital sent fi.)r ; but in vain, life being quite extinct. It appears that a fatality attaches to the deceased's fa mily, as not long since two •of his brothers committed suicide, one by cutting his throat, and the other by drowning himself. It was also stated that bis wife had twice befobeen married, and "that both of her former husbands Md also destroyed themselves. The Jury returned a verdict of Temporary Insanity." THE INCOME-TA,x,..—WoRR FOR THR LAWYERS:— IR the cause of - ilVer v. Silver, decided on the 13th of • July by the VieosPhaneellor, his Honour stated that so many questions would arise in the construction of the Income-tax Act that unless it were continued bey Mid ihe three 3-ears, there would nut be time to dispose of all the questions that would come before the Court.— Worcestershire Chronicle.. A I HOW TO CARVE MUTTON.-"-- Shall I cut this l o i n of mtmuttonsaddleitise ?.., said u.gg at 1 eulan. ••said one of his guests, cut it bridlewise, kr then I may chance to get . a bit in m y mouth." ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE, . HOME ClRCUlT—Guildford, August 2. (Before Lord ARINGER and a Special.jury.) LIBEL.—GREVILLE V. CHAPMAN AND ANOTHER. This was an action brought by the Hon. 'Mr. Gre-. vale, against the defendants, who . are the proprietors:of the Sunday Times newspaper, for publishing a libel upon the plaintiff, in that paper. .The libel complained of was contained itfa report of the proceedings of the last Ep som Races, and the plaintiff was accused - of having with draWnhis horse Canadian from that rau, in order that he might win several large bets that he had made against him. The defendants put several pleas upon the record, which were, in fact, tantamount to a plea of justification. Mr. Thesiger, Mr. Bodkin, and Mr. Peacock were for the plaintiff. The Solicitor-General, who was specially retained, with Mr. Platt, and Mr. Taylor, were for the defendants. Mr. MESMER addressed the Jury, and said he had the honour to appear on behalf of the plaintiff, who was a gold...inlet' connected with some of the first families in the kingdom, who had for several years filled the office or joint-clerk to her Majesty's Privy Council, and who had for many years enjoyed the esteem of a numerous circle of friends, but who felt himself com pelled to come before a Jury in vindication of his honour, to complain of the publication of a foul libel and calumfly upon him by the defendants, who were the proprietors of a newspaper called the Sunday Times, They were not content with publishing the offensive ar ticle now complained of, but when they were asked to give a contradiction or explanation, they not only refused to do so, but inserted another article in. a subsequent publication, in which they defended the original statement, and declared it to be true. The charges made against the defendant were of a most seri c'ius character, and affected him deeply as a man of honour, and he loofted forward to the result of this ac tion with the deepest anxiety. The Learned Counsel then proceeded to state the facts of the case, as they afterwards appeared in evidence ; and having read the libel, he said that the plaintiff was accused of having betted large sums of money against his horse Cana dian, and that just b,fore the race he withdrew-him from the contest, in order that he might win the money in this dishonourable and disgraceful manner ; and this was not the extent of the charge Made against him, for he' was likewise accused of having lamed Mr hors', or - caused him to be lamed, in order to afford a colourable pretext for • withdrawing him from the race. Having detailed the facts, the Learned Counsel said that Mr. Greville re pelled with scorn the imputations cast upon him. He had no means of discovering who• his calumniator was, and he had taken the only course left open to him, of appealing to the law, and daring his assailant to the proof of the charges made against him. The de fendants had accepted the challenge; and the Jury would have to decide whether the defendants had any ground for the foul attack they hail thought fit to make upon the plaintiff. Ile was not fearful of the issue, and he was glad that the defendants had met the case in this manner, because it would give him an opportunity of ascertaining upon what foundation they had made the charges against him, and to see what proof they would offer in support of these charges. The Learned Counsel concluded by saying that the plaintiff did not seek for vindictive damages, but when such a foul charge was made against him, he did expect that the Jury would let the, world know, by their verdict, what was their opinion of the charge, and that they would give such damages as would satisfy all who knew the plain tiff; that it was a foul and calumnious attack that had been made upon him, without the slightest ground or semblance of truth for its foundation. The libel was then put in and read. It was in sub stance to the effect above stated. The proprietorship of the paper was also admitted. Montgomery Dilly was then called. He deposed as follows :—I have been for many years trainer to Mr. Greville, and I keep stables for him at Littleton, in Hampshire. I remember the horse Canadian, and I saw him win a race at Newmarket ; and upon my re commendation he was afterwards purchased by • Mr. Greville of the Duke of Grafton, to whom he then be longed, and the horse was brought to Littleton, and placed under my care. He was engaged in the Derby of this year, and he was regularly trained and put in condition for the race. On the 21st of May, the SattPi day before the Epsom race week, Mr. Greville came down to see the horse with Nat, the jockey who was to ride and he was taken to a paddock and ridden by Nat in the presence of tho plaintiff, and I afterwards received instructions to send him to Epsom on the fol lowing Monday, and the plaintiff then returned tb town. On the Sunday the horse was exercised by a lad named Humby, and soon after the horse was brought home I received a communication which led me to the stable, and I then found that the horse was lame on the near side hock. I immediately sent a communication to Mr. Greville, and the next morning Mr. Field, the veteri nary surgeon came to look at the horse ; and after he had examined him, he was placed in a van and was conveyed to Epsom. The horse still continued lame, and he was seen by Mr. Day the trainer, and Mr. Ste phenson, the trainer to the Duke of Grafton. He was very lame on the Tuesday morning, and was evidently quite unfit to run a race, He was lame for several weeks after this, and forfeited his engagements at Ascot and Goodwood, and other places where he was to have run. There was no appearance of injury to the leg, and I could not account for the lameness. Cross-examined—l have been a trainer to Mr. Gre• vine since 1837. Ile has been many years connected with the turf, and keeps several race-horses, but I do not know anything about his bets. I sometimes bet myself, but I did not bet anything upon Canadian in this race. Mr. Greville's jockey rode the horse on Saturday, and at that time he was perfectly sound, and no sign of lameness was discovered until the Sunday, when the horse was removed from one side of the stall to the other. He was very lame on the Sunday, and he was not in a state to run ; and when Mr. Field came to see him on. the Monday morning, if there was any difference he was more lame. Mr. Field directed that the leg i should bo bathed with cold lotions, and he consented that he should be taken to Epsom. The horse was placed in a van, and was taken to Kingston by the railway, and from thence by post-horses to Epsom, when he was taken to the stables of Mr. Wood. The time occupied in taking the horse to Epsom was about four hours, and when, we got there I did not tell any person about the horse being lame. A. person named Wood was present, but I did not tell him anything about the lameness. It is not usual for trainers to tell if there is anything the matter with their horses. There is generally betting at Tattersall's on the Sunday and the Monday before the Derby day. On the Tuesday any person seeing the horse would not have known that he was lame, and I had him walked about on the pad dock for an hour and a half or so, where every body could see him. I think he trotted on the paddock, and when he trotted he went lame. I still kept my counsel, and did not tell any one that the horse was lame. lie was still in the same state at twelve o'clock on the Tuesday, and on that day he was declared not to start. I knew that the horse was not to start between eight and nine o'clock on the Tuesday morning. Mr. Greville came to see him on that morning, and asked me' how the horse was, and I told him that he was still lame ; and it was then stated that he was not to run, but this was . nclt made kno.vn publicly until one or two o'clock. I did not hear any bets made upon Canadian on that day or,at any other time. Mr. Wood did not say to me, "Well, have you brought Canadian to win the Derby ?" neither did I reply, " I suppose so, for he has taken.his last. gallop at. Littleton." The horse was not examined by any veterinary surgeon at Epsom either on the Monday or the Tuesday. Mr Field recommended that the horse should be bled and have a dose of physic. Canadian had won . three ' times before I and Mr. Gre ville Went to see him. Hiked the horseand recommended hith to•Mr: Greville, and he decided upon purchasing him. Re-examined—lt would be a breach of confidence in a trainer to tell any one that his horse was lame. On the Tuesday morning Mr. Greville told Nat, his jockey, .that ho might ride Lord Chesterfield's horse, as he did not think Canadian would be able to start. I do not know of horses being lame shortly before -a race, and rttraning and -winning the race. Ino not knol that I ever had a horse fall 'lame- to suddenly as Canadian did. I have known them to cb so-in their-gallops, but not in this manner. • • •By the Cooler—The jockey was at Littleton on the Saturday two or three hours, and I went to the place where the horse was sweated, and when ke first began to run he was apparently perfectly sound.. lie went about four miles in his sweat, and when it was over I did not observe any difference in his gait. Mr. William Dilly, examined by Mr. PEACOCK —I am brother to the last witness, and assist him in training race horses. I saw Canadian on the Sunday before the Epsom race, and observed him being ridden by a boy, named Ilumby, to exercise. \When he w as brought in I did not see that he was lame. The boy rode him for about three quarters of an hour, and when he was put in the stable I went to examine him, and found that he was lame in the near hind leg, but no cause for the lameness was perceptible. In consequence of this I went to London, and saw Mr. Greville, anti Mr. Field, the veteri nary surgeon, was sent for, and he accompanied me back to Littleton to see the horse, and I then found that he was lamer tha a p when I left him. The witness then went on to detail the facts stated by his brother, and confirmed his evidence. Cross-examined—The horse was walked to Winchester race course to be exercised, and it was walked and galloped about. We do not sweat horses on Sunday.—(Laughter!') After the boy had galloped the horse a short time, he got off and led him. When a horse is strained the part generally swells. After the lameness was discovered, I felt down the horse's legs, but could not detect any inflammation, ur heat, or sprain, or any thing to which I could attribute the lameness. The foot was quite pprfeet when we had the she taken off. I got to Epsom on the Tuesday, but I did not hear that the horse was not to run until I had been some time upon the course. I had no inter est to see Canadian at that time. By the COURT—There was no appearance of external injury on the horse's legs. George Humby, examined by Mr. THESIGER—I was stable boy and groom to the plaintiff, and attended upon Canadian at Littleton. I rode .him on the Sunday for two or three hours, and when I took him to the stable to dress him, the other servant, She,man, pointvd out to me that the horse was lame, tad I observed that he flinched when he was made to mr,ve from one side to the other. I immediately informed Mr. Dilly of the circumstance. The horse was taken to Epsom on the Monday, and I accompanied hire, and observed that he favoured the near hind leg. On the Tuesday, at Epsom, 1 rode the horse at a walking pace in the paddock for about an hoar and a half, and I found that he still continued lame. By the Soracrron-GENERAL—The re were not many other horses in the paddock at the time, but they were all horses that were to run at the races. I don't know that. Cana dian was so lame that any one oho saw him could per- Ceire it. There were several people, trainers, and dif ferent sorts of persons, looking at the horses, but I did not hear any one remark that my horse was lame. Ido not k , r i ro u t e u a l v iy . I walked him about for an hour and a half on the Several persons looked at the horse in the stable, but I did not say any thing about his being lame. Re-examined—Mr. Greville had another horse called Pale mon that was to run at these races. By Lord ABIMOI.R— -• ' I did not find out that the horse was lame until he:,was taken into the stable after I had exercised him on the Sunday. Sherman first found oat that the horse was lame. I began to diess the horse, but I did not discover that he was lame. Thomas Sherman—l am in the service of the plaintiff, and I remember Canadian being exercised en the Sunday before Epsom races, and I assisted Humby to clean him after he was THE rSUN, LONDON, FRIDAY * EVENTYI , 4G, AUGUST 5, 1842 brought in. When I went to turn the horse from one side or • the stall to the other I discovered that he was lame in the near leg behind. Cross-examined—l don't know but what Canadian is now at Littleton. I saw him on Tuesday last, and he was not lame then. He was lame a month ago, and he was lame for several weeks after the Derby, but no one attended upon him, and nothing was done to him except that the leg was bathed with cold lotions. No veterinary surgeon attended upon him. I could not find any hurt or swelling when I examined the horse, and I don't recollect that I ever saw such a lameness before. Mr. PLATT—Was it not the like mange ? Witness—l can't say that exactly. Mr. Wm. Field—l am a veterinary surgeon, and I was sent for by the plaintiff, who wished me to go to Littleton to see his horse, Canadian; and he told me if I thoug,tt it would not hurt the horse, that he should like tin to go to Epsom. On Monday, the 23d inst., I went down to Littleton to the place where the horse was. Mr. Greville told me that he wished the horse to run, and that lie should see him at that place, and judge for himself whether llc was capable of running. 1 found the horse lame, in my opinion from injury to the near hock. There was a slight appearance of heat on that part. I made a careful examini tom, and observed that there was more apparent lameneis when be turned, than when he walked straight. He was not in a fit state to run a race, but 1 considered his being re moved to Epsom would not Burt him. I prescribed the application of cold lotions to the leg. 1 have no doubt that the injury was of a character very likely to show itself more after exercise, and when the horse got cool. Having prescribed for the horse, I returned to London and saw Greville, and told him in!, opinion that the injury might be speedily removed, but, in the then state of the horse, I told him it would injure the hone if he was . started fur the race. On the Tuesday I saw Canadian at Epsom, and the lameness then appeared to be in the same state. When the horse was put into the van to go to Epsom, he was lame. Cross-examined—l thought the horse might recover in two or three weeks, but he would certainly nut have been well enough to run for the Derby ; and I believe I expressed this opinion to Dlr. Greville on the Monday. The horse was what 1 should call very lame, and not competent to run for the Derby with any chance of winning, and I said this to the plaintiff, and I think he told me that he should follow my advice, and if he found the horse in the 'state I reported, that he should not run. I was to send the horse to Epsom if I thought the journey would not injure him. When 1 sent him I did not see any chance of his being able to run. I have never seen him since. I considered rest would be the only remedy. 1 think it very probable the injury was occasioned by a sprain or stretching of the hock, and I thought that was the seat of the disease, from the heat 1 felt at that part. I think it is possible the horse might have been walked round the paddock at Epsom, and that experienced persons, trainers and others, might not have ob ierved it, unless it was pointed out. I. think that walking or trotting the horse would be injurious, and I cannot tell with what object he was walked about for an hour and a half. I had given directions when I was at Littleton that the hone should be kept perfectly quiet. Re-examined—lt would be necessary to see the horse in action in order to judge whether he would be tit to run on the Wednesday. By the COURT—I told Mr. Greville on the Monday that the horse could not run without danger. Mr. Isaac Day—l am a trainer of horses, but not publicly, and I have; had experience with horses. I was at Epsom on the 24th of May, and, by desire of the plaintiff, 1 went to see Canadian, and found that he was lame, and certainly not in a fit state to run in the Derby on the following morning. I bled the horse on the Wednesday. Cross-examined—l heard that Canadian was not to run be tween two and three o'clock on the Tuesday, and I think Lord George Bentinck was the first who told me of it. I was at the Spread Eagle on the same night, and I saw Mr. Craven there, and heard some observations made by that gentleman, but not in reference to Canadian being withdrawn from the race. I was in the large room about half an hour, but nothing was said there about Canadian. I think Mr. Cravcn made some observations about withdrawing horses, and it was with reference to that that Mr. Craven mentioned the name of the plaintiff. I heard Mr. Craven say that withdrawing the horse was nothing short of an infernal robbery, and he said the members of the Jockey Club were all infernal robbers. He said that he always ran his horses to win, and did not bet against his own horses. Mr. Greville's name was mentio ne d, but I do not know that it was in reference to these observa tions. Mr. Craven appeared to me interested. I won't swear that he did not say the withdrawing of Canadian was an in fernal robbery. He did not say that he had heard Mr. Gre. ville tell some one that he had betted 10,0001. to 3001. against Canadian. I did not hear aoy such remarks, but I will not swear that they were not made. Mr. Craven became very violent, and I left the bar-room where he was. Mr. Fulwer Craven examined by Mr. THESIGER—I was at the Spread Eagle at Epsom on the night before the Derby, and I will swear that I did not say that I had heard Mr. Grc ville declare that he had betted 10,0001. to 3001. against Ca nadian, and that he considered it a good bet at the time. Crossexamined—l betted on Attila. I did not bet against Canadian particularly. Sir W. FOLLETT—Excuse me for asking the question; but were you sober ? Witness—lt was after dinner, but I have a recollection of what occurred. 1 did make some strong observations relative to horses that were sound being withdrawn on the night before a race, and the observations would have applied to Canadian if he had been sound, but I don't know that the name was men tioned. I said also that the racing fraternity, the Jockey Club, trainers, betting men, myself included, were all infernal rogues. (Laughter.) I will not swear that Canadian'sname was not men tioned. 1 have no recollection of saying that Charles Greville was a rogue. Ido not think any one said to me, " You are quite right, Sir, it is an infernal robbery." I heard Charles Gieville, on the 1,000/.day at Newmarket, say that he had betted 10,0001. to 3001. against Canadian, and that he thought it was a good bet at the time. I will not swear positively that that one ob servation was not made in the room, but I did not hear it. An other horse that was expected to run besides Canadian was withdrawn on the Tuesday. He was not quite an outsider, but the odds might have been thirty to one' against him. I don't know what were the odds against Canadian. He was a favourite with a good many people on account of his running at New market. I never made use of the expression " Unlike Charles Greville, I run my horses to win." By the COURT—There are so many stories about betting made on these occasions, that I don't attend to one-half of what is said. Dilly re-called—The horse was lame for several weeks after the races, but no veterinary surgeon attended upon him. He did not run at Goodwood. Mr. Robert Stephenson—l am trainer to his Grace the Duke of Grafton. I have known Canadian since he was a yearling. In' the year 1841 he met with an accident, and was lame for two months, and the fact was publicly known. He was afterwards sold to Mr. Greville, and at that time he was perfectly sound. About two o'clock on the Tuesday, I learned that Canadian was not to run. Mr. Greville told me of the circumstance. I know that it was part of the bargain when the horse was purchased from the Duke of Grafton that he was to have 1,0001. more if he won the Derby. 'went to see the horse at. Mr. Greville's request, and found him lame, and not in a fit state to run. I have been trainer a great many years, and I have known instances of lameness coming suddenly, and disappearing as suddenly. I knew the horse Robert de Gorham, who ran at Epsom. He was at one time in the next stable to. Canadian. Their speed had never been tried against each other. Cross-examined—Canadian had been tried against a horse called Chatham, and beat him. Chatham had ran against Ro bert de Gorham, and beat him easily. I don't think it follows that Canadian would have beat Robert de Gorham. Chatham was ill when he ran against Canadian.—(lt will be remembered that Robert de Gorham ran second to Attila, the winner of the Derby). I examined Canadian, and felt a slight heat about the near hock. lam not aware of any harm being done to the horse by walking him about when he was lame. Re-examined—Chatham ran on the last Derby, and he was, of course, beaten by Robert de Gorham. Mr. George Weatherby—l am Secretary to the Jockey Club. The horse Canadian was entered to run in the last Epsom Derby, the Ascot Derby, the Drawing-room Stakes at Goodwood, and the Duke Michael Stakes at Newmarket. The horse was entered in the name of the Duke of Grafton. The amount of the Derby Stakes would be 5,000/., with some trifling deductions; the Ascot Derby would be about 4001.; the Drawing-room Stakes about 1,2001., and the Duke Michael Stakes would amount to about 1,0001. I remember some ne gotiation in reference to a bet between Colonel Peel and Lord Charles Fitzroy, and it was disputed whether the former had laid 10,000/. to 300/. or to 1001. against Canadian and another horse belonging to the Duke of Grafton, and ulti mately the Jockey Club recommended that the bet should be withdrawn. Mr. Greville has paid all his forfeits upon the races I have mentioned. Cross-examined.—lt was, I b lieve, a joint bet between Col. Peel and Mr. Greville against Canadian and Oneida Chief. Before the 1,0001. day at Newmarket, the Jockey Club re commended the withdrawal of this bet. The decisions of the Jockey Club are considered to be binding. The principle upon which the Club acts is upon a consideration of what is fair and honourable in the matter in dispute. If the Duke of Grafton bad continued the owner of these horses, he might have withdrawn them from the races if he pleased, without assigning any reason. The Jockey Club knew nothing of any bet, and if the owner of a horse chose to order him to strike out the name he must do so. If a person the owner of a race-horse betted against him, lie might withdraw him if he pleased; at least, I know of no rule to the contrary. If the owner of a horse makes a bet that his horse will not win, and he then withdraws him, by the rules of the Jockey Club the bet must be paid to the owner of the horse. A person who Makes a bet, it he loses, mustpay it. The SOLICITOR-GENERA L —That is to say, if a person who has a race-horse, one even who is likely to win; and he bets against him and withdraws him, and prevents him thereby from winning, the beta must be paid ? Witness'---I know of nothing to the contrary. Lord John Fitzroy—l am brother to the Duke of Grafton, and I manage his racing establishment. Canadian was the property of the Duke, and I remember his being lame in 1841. I negotiated the sale of the horse with Mr. Greville, and it was arranged that 2,000 i. was to be paid down, another LOCO/. if he won the Derby, and he was to be taken with all his en . gagment?. Cross-examined—A person who has a horse engaged to run in any race may withdraw him at his own option, and without assigning any reason for it. There is no rule of the turf to prevent the owner of a horse from betting against him, and he would receive all such bets if he withdren his horse, and if there were a dispute the Jockey Club would decide to that effect. Lord ABINGER—They appear to have a peculiar code of morals if they say that a man who bets 10,000/. against his horse, wire the money by withdrawing the horse for the purpose of getting the money, and without any other reason being given. Lord John Fitzroy--I do not defend such a course of con duct, but I only :ay that such a proceeding might be effected. lie-examined--I should consider it a most dishonourable act for a horse to be withdrawn by its owner, when he had made bets against it ; and I don't think any gentleman would be guilty of such conduct. No man would be tolerated in society who was proved to have done such a thing. Lord ABINGEIt—But would he be tolerated by the Jockey Club ? Lord John Fitzroy— I think if such an act was proved against any member that he would be expelled. Colonel Peel was then examined, and he proved that Mr. Greville and he had a joint betting-book, and he stated that there was some misunderstanding between him and Lord C. Fitz roy relative to a bet. of 10,0001. to 3001. against Canadian, and the matter was referied to the Jockey Club. who recommended that that the bet should be cancelled, and this was accordinglydone. Ile then went on to state that if Canadian had won the Derby, that, as their book stood, they should have won 8,000/., and there were only two other horses on the list by whom they could have won so much as by Canadian. The arrangement of betting was to lay odds against all the horses, so as to ensure a balance in their favour. - Cross-examined—They betted about 6,0001. to 3451. against Canadian, and of course they won that amount by his being withdrawn, and it he had won they would have had to pay the 6,000/., but on the othet hand, they would have had to receive from all the other horses, and the amount would have been nearly 14,000/., so that if Canadian had • been a runner they should have gained 8,000/. Witness did not know that the horse was withdrawn till the-Tuesday. and he had made some bets against him- on the Monday. _By the race being won by Attila they won about 4,6001. If Ctiatbarn bad won they would have gained 9,0001., and if Sea Horse had gained the race their winnings would have been 16,0001. The witne;:s said ha had heard complaints made of horses being withdrawn, and he said he was also aware that it was customary for persons to be sent about the country by the owner of a horse to make bets for him. This was the case for the plaintiff. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL then addressed the Jury at con siderable length for the defendant. lie contended that from the plaintiff's own witnesses, it was clear that there were practices on the turf which all honourable members of it must desire to see put an end to, and he , submitted that the defendant had not gone further thin he ought to do in expressing what he believed to be a gross fraud upon those parties who had honestly risked their money upon the horse belonging to the plaintiff. The case was a most mysterious one. It was admitted that the lameness was one of a most extraor dinary character, such as none of the witnesses had ever seen in a horse before ; and vet although the plaintiff was well aware of the fact, and had been satisfied by the veterinary surgeon, that it was impossible for the horse to run, ho sent . him to Epsom, he was exercised in the paddock with the other horses that were to run, and the public were naturally induced to believe that he would start, and betted their money on him, when the plaintiff was well satisfied that the horse could not run. He argued that it was the duty of the plaintiff, the moment that he became aware of the fact of the lameness, to have at once let the public know of it, and not to have sent the horse to Epsom, which must necessarily have deceived every body, and induced the world to be lieve that he was in a fit state to start for the race. The Learned Solicitor-General argued at considerable length upon these points, and he also submitted to the Court that inasmuch as betting upon a horse race wasan illegal act, the plaintiff could not snake any proceeding arising out of it the ground of an ac• tion for libel. Lerd MUNGER, having expressed his opinion that the tech nical point raised by the Counsel for the defendant was no an swer to the present action, proceeded to address the Jury upon the facts, and in the course of his observations he said, that the question for the Jury was, whether the article published in the defendants' newspaper was 0_• was not a libellous attack upon Co; plaintiff. He then referred to the pleadings, and said that the defendant had undertaken to justify the publication in question, on the ground that it was true ; and, in his opinion he had entirely failed to make out that plea. The Solicitor-General had made a very ingenious address to them, but he must take care that they were not led away by it from the real question at issue, which was whether or not the defendant had published a false and calum nious libel upon the character and honour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff had been accused of dishonestly withdrawing his horse trom a race, in order that he might win the money he had laid against him, and also that he had actually lamed the horse, in order to give a pretext for withdrawing him. These allega tions were proved to be false, and then the defendant's counsel turned round and said, " Oh, it may be all very true that, the horse really was lame, but the plaintiff ought to have made the public acquainted with the fact sooner." This was very ingenious, but it was no answer to the present action, and he felt bound to express his opinion that the defendant had failed in all his pleas, and that the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict, with such damages as the Jury should think under the circumstances he was entitled to. The Jury, having consulted for a few minutes, returned a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, 2501. COOK AND OTHERS V. lIITCIICOCK. This action was tried by a special jury. The plaintiffs are Messrs. Co.)k and Gladstone, Manchester warehouse men and silk-mercers, and the defendant is George Hitchcock, brother of William Hitchcock, the bankrupt, whose case excited so much sensation a short time since. The ac Lion was to recover the amount of a bill of ex change for 7,000/, accepted by the defendant and his brother. The defendant pleaded, first, that he did not accept the bill in question; secondly, that it was accepted only upon the condition that it was to be renewed at the expiration of every twelvemonth for some years, and also that it was only given as a security for the re-payinent of the sum mentioned in seven years; but that, in violation of the agreement, the plaintiffs nover advanced the money, and it was likewise pleaded that they had charged a usurious rate of interest, viz., 71. 10s. per cent. far the use of the money, and that the defendant, therefore, was not liable. Mr. Thesiger, Mr. Sergeant Chappell, and Mr. M. Chambers were for the plaintiffs; and Mr. Platt and Mr. Peacock for the defendant. The bill having been put in, and the acceptance proved, Mr. PLATT addressed the Jury, and alluded at some length to the pleadings. Some deeds and documents having been put in, the Learned Counsel called Mr. W. Hitchcock, who deposed that he formerly ,car ried on the business of a linendraper and silkmercer in Regent-street, and that he had had extensive business transactions with the plaintiffs, and had been in the habit of borrowing money of them on various occasions. In the month of April, 1840, he was desirous of obtaining from them a further sum of 7,000/., and the plaintiffs agreed to let him have it if he could get the security of his brother, the defendant. After some negociation witness and his brother went to the plaintiffs' house, and had an interview with. them. At this time the plaintiffs held the leases of Nos. 114 and 118 in Regent-street, as security for the money he owed them. An arrange ment was made that the money should be advanced for seven years, and his brother was to join him in giv ing security ; and he proposed that the lease of No. -118 should be placed in his possession as a guarantee ; this was arranged, with interest at 71 per cent. It was then arranged that the interest should be paid every year, and a bill for 5251. 12s. 6d., being the amount of the first year's interest and the stamp, was drawn by the plain tiffs, payable in twelve months, and witness accepted it, and it was paid in due course. The bill for 7,000/.. was drawn and accepted 'by witness and his brother, and at the expiration of the first year it was replaced by an other bill for the same amount, payable in another year. This was the bill upon which the present action was brought. Cross-examined—Witness waS , a 'bankrupt, and had not got his certificate. His examination was adjourned sine die, but he intended to go up again. - Mr. TIIESIGEI4—DO you remember hearing the Corn-, missioner say that you left the Court unworthy of credit? Mr. PLATT obj(cted to such a question being put; and it was not pressed. The examination taken before the Commissioner 'of Bankrupts was then put in, to contradict the statements made by the witness Hitchcock. The examination of the present defendant was also put in. MK T HERG ER addressed the Jury at some length, contending that the defendant's case had entirely failed ; that the evidence of the bankrupt was unworthy of credit, and that the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict. Some argument then took place upon the pleadings, and after considerable discussion, Lord ABINGEII expressed his opinion that the only pleas upon which a question would arise were those al leging usury. And he left it to the jury to say-Ist, Whether the loan was for seven years at 7i per cent. ; and, if so, he was of opinion it was usurious, and the pro missory-note void. 2d. Whether the money was lent at 71 per cent., and that it was part of the original agree ment that the security for the loan should be the note of the brother and the security of the lease. The jury found, first, that it was a loan for seven years at 71 per cent. ; secondly, that the principal se curity was the note of hand, and that the lease was the collateral security. After considerable discussion whether the verdict should not be entered for the defendant upon the third issue, the Learned Judge directed a special verdict as found by the jury to be' entered on the record as above stated, eaving it to the Court above to decide for whom it should b^ ultimately entered. TOBACCO REGULATIONS BILL. TO THE EDITOR OF THE SUN. SIR, In your report of the Parliamentary proceed ings, which I read in Tuesday's Sun, I find the Chan celloi of the Exchequer, when speaking of the above Fill, •making use of the following expression "And the trade will he put on a wholesome footing.'' kow in the name of common sense, how can the trade ever be any thing else than upon an unwholesome footing, since the article (tobacco) will ever remain, what it is—a poison. Anything is wholesome in the eyes of the Government which brings grist to the mill. Poisoning the Chinese with opium, and administering to them leaden pills to assist its digestion, are very wholesome actions, and tobaccO is just as wholesome as opium or lead. I remain, &c., J. H. M. Huddersfield, Aug. 4, 1842. IVELANCHOIX ACCIDENT.-About ten o'clock on esday evening, a party of six persons, three younc , ladies and three gentlemen, named Sarah Ann Smith, Eliza Martin, Priscilla Williams, James Guildersleeve, William Guild s and another young man whose name we did not learn, started up the East river in a row boat. Having proceeded as far as the foOt of Houston - street, being about fifty yards from shore, they saw one of the Williamsbnrgh ferry boats, the Newton, within twenty yards 'of them. The tide at the time was setting hard up the river, and they found it impossible to get out of the way of the boat, as it was comimg directly on them. They hailed the ferry-boat, - but before it was stopped it came in collision with the row-boat, upset it, and the three females were drowned ; the men were saved—one of wham clung to the .ferry boat, and the other two to the small boat. Only one of the bodies have as yet been found, that of Sarah Ann Smith, upon which the Coroner yesterday held an inquest, and the Jury returned a ver dict—" Came to her death by being run over by the ferry boat Newton, while in a small boat in the East river t .on the evening of the 12th instant, through the carelessness of the. pilot_ of said ferry beat." Jacob Cor son, the pilot, on hearing the verdict, vol u nt a ril y sur rendered himself, and gave bail to answer any charge whic i li tu might be A bepNrDefeLreErdcalgv A Killt . --- 7 Some time ago an ainst hi m. —New Yor k Pap e r.' THE English Quaker was honoured with an interview by his Holiness the Pope. The Quaker, having passed through France, had been shocked at the manner in which Sunday was desecrated in that country. He, therefore, took the opportunity which the interview presented of mentioning the - subject, to his Holiness, and of suggesting to him the propriety of his interference to cause Sunday to be kept holy and free from secular employment. The Pope assured the Quaker that -he was not ignorant of the open violation of the Sabbath in France, and was extremely anxious that it should, as it ought, be kept holy. The time was when the person occupying; the chair of St. P e t er cou ld directly interfere in the affairs of foreign States, and when Emperors, Kings, and Princes attended to the beheSts of the Vatican. But the times had Changed. He could not now exercise any temporal authority beyond the ; limits of the Papal States. All that he could do, to repress vice and crime in foreign States, was by a ddressin g letters of advice and remonstrance to the heads of the Church in communion with the Holy Catholic Church in those States. Ile had remonstrated with those in France on the open violation of the Sab bath in that king dom, and should not omit any oppo rtunit y of ex p ressin g his strong disapprobation of the anti-Christian practices which there prevailed. The Quaker, gratified by th e sentiments which he had ghien the successor of St. Peter an opportunity of expressing, thereupon took his leave of his noliness.—LiverpoolA B ion. THE SHEARING IN NANTyCKET.-7.1110 Nantucket Islander says that some nine or ten thousand sheep of 'Oat island were stripped of their fie#Ceilast week ; that the shearing has been more profitable than arty for seve ral years past ; and that a hundred sheep pernhed in a I storm last Thursday night. , HIGH W ATIP AT LONDON BRIDGE THIS DAY. .corning l6 minutes after 0 1 Evening ..... 46 minutes after 0. TO CORRESPONDENTS. " A Sudbury Elector."—ln our paper of July 9, Com mons' Debate, the date for the suspension of the Sud bury Writ should be " August 12,' instead of " Au gust 3," as there by error reported. . , §-urte, ;5 4 :cronbiZtatton SUN OFFICE Three o'Clock. A careful perusal of all the intelligence brought by the overland mail relative to the war in Affghanistan is not calculated to impress an attentive and generally well informed reader with a conviction of our ultimate triumphs in that country. Large as is the force already there, it appears that we can effect little or nothing from want of camels, gun-carriages, waggons, and a ne cessary supply of provisions and water. General PoL LOCK'S force is suffering severely from climate, want of baggage, and deficiency of food. For a whole month 10,000 men had been at Jellalabad doing nothing. The expenditure of beasts of burden in the Affghan war has been enormous. General ZoLLoca had but 3,500 camels at Jellalabad, and had written to the Government of India that without 7,000 more, he could not advance upon the city of Caubul. Since the commencement of the war, 68,000 camels had been sent to Caubul, so that the stock in India was almost exhausted. The heavy guns, too, had all been left behind, as the Passes could only be forced by the lightest pieces of artillery. The Calcutta Star—a highly respectable journal—states posi tively that Lord ELLENBOROUGH has already resolved to seize the first decisive victory over the Affghans to evacuate the country altogether. The Editor asserts that he himself saw an order from the Adjutant- General's Office, dated " May 14, 1842," beginning " Instructions having been issued for the with drawal within the British provinces, of the troops serving west of the Indus, it has become necessary to make arrangements for the comforts of the different corps during their march across the Punjaub." The Bombay Times applauds this policy, ps wise, just, and necessary. The war there has already cost us upwards of seven mil lions sterling, and cannot be maintained at a less sum than three millions annually, of which two millions in coined silver must be drawn annually from the Indian Treasury, never to return to it. " Our armies," says that ! Journal, " are dispirited by mishap, and the offi cers ruined by their own expenses, and beyond measure sick of the war. We have no baggage cattle to carry our artillery or commissariat, nor is it possible, at any price, to procure them. The winter sets in beyond the mountains early in November, and the snows are not entirely cleared away before April arrives ; so that as we have no fortified post, camp, or cantonment—and shrunk before from the cost of their construction at Caubul—any expedition which could have been undertaken would have been for a few months only ; the enemy would have tluded us among the mountains, and our army would have to fall back pelf. moll in October; leaving us to renew the war again next year at an expense of twenty millions sterling. We therefore consider the order for the abandonment of the country, said to have been issued by the Governor- General, as the most wise and manly one that could have been resolved upon." When to, these considerations are added the alleged treachery of Sir W. MeNAGHTEN, which led to his murder, and the fearful massacre that followed, it would seem that we cannot too soon wash our hands of that country. The Journal of General ELPHINSTONE, now in the hands of the British Govern ment, " shows," says the Bombay Times, " that Sir W. M•NAGHTEN lost his life in consequence of having laid an ambush to get into his hands the Caubul chiefs as sembled to meet him in conference ! Two regiments were in readiness to have rushed out upon them, secured them, and carried them to the camp. The intended treachery was discovered in time; by the Affghans, who accordingly prepared a counterplot to carry the Envoy and his attendants into Caubul. Sir W. M'NAGIITEN would not suffer himself to be placed on horseback—a violent altercation ensued—blows were exchanged, when the Sirdar seized a pistol, and shot him on the spot." Another account says " For several days before the last fatal conference, the Envoy exhibited a discomposure and irritability of temper altogether foreign to • his nature. He became silent at the same time, and uncommunicative ; and although something of unusual moment seemed to be harassing him, he avoided all intercourse or consultation with his usual friends and advisers. On directing a couple of regiments with guns to be got ready for emergent ser vice, Gen. Elphinstone cautioned him as to the steps which appeared to be in contemplation—the peculiar nature of which was kept strictly concealed. The Envoy said snap pishly that he need not concern himself about the matter, but have the troops ready when required—the plot thickened well, and would evolve itself apace. 'The plot, your Excellency !' said the Commander-in-Chief, Plot is an ominous word in the mouth of an English man !' It proved too true. It was an ill-omened word for Caubul 1 These things, which now begin to trans pire in fragments, will by and bye lie brought to light entire. A b war commenced in injUstice, appears to have been conducted throughout in the midst of delusions, and terminated in one of the saddest attempts at fraud and faithlessness for which a Briton ever yet required to blush." As everything connected with this mysterious affair is of the utmost importance, we quote yet a third frag ment:— " Sir W. M`Naghten appears, for some time before his deMise, to have acted like a fated man ; he revealed his resolutions to no one, and sought the sympathies of none. We have already noticed his order for a couple of Re giments, with guns, to pounce upon the Chiefs as sembled for conference. On his way to join them on the fatal 23d of December. Captain Mackenzie—who, like the rest, feared the consequences of an . ambush or counterplot— warned him that he was was walking into a pitfall, and that a trap was laid for him ; he would listen to nothing—but like one destined to destruction, rushed upon his fate. The expression used by the party who placed the head of the Envoy before Ameen Oola —that Sir William M`Nagliten had wished to have the insurgent chief's head, but had lost his own in going in quest of it—as reported by the early narrators, now be comes intelligible to us, referring, as it dtiubtless does, to the foul play intended by the Envoy." The Bombay Times concludes an interesting article on the affairs of Affghanistan, as follows : " We refer our readers to the fragments of the memoir of General Elphinstone. The last named paper was sent home by the steamerof the 23d of May. Parliament, we trust, will insist on its publication. It shows that to . the former Governor-General 'we owe it that cantonments were not constructed at Caubul fitting for our army, and that to his ilbjudged parsimony we, are indebted for the outbreak of the Ghilzies of the passes, who revenged themselves, first on Sir Robert Sale, and afterwards on the retiring army of General Elphinstone, in consequence of the tribute which had been undertaken to be paid them being withdrawn. The letters of Sir Alexan der Burnes to the Government of India, betwixt 1837 and 1839, have been moved for in Parliament. This is not half enough ; we must have his communications to the ,Envoy, from December 1839, to July 1841. We must also have the whole of the papers of Mr. Ross Bell, connected with the, affairs of Scinde ; and those of Captain Bean on Shawl affairs—and we shall then be able to judge whether it arose from a series of untoward and unlooked for accidents, or a system of unprincipled recklessness and mad mis management, that the late fearful crisis in our affairs was brought about. In addition to this, we demand the personal examination of Mr. Charles Masson, an indi vidual admitted in 1838, by the Supreme Government, to have more knowledge of these ill-omened countries, than all the rest of their employes put together. There are in his possession, certain papers, which will, in all likelihood, make their appearance on his examination; which, conjoined with the other documents already re f,rred to, will make the people of England stare !" We give elsewhere some interesting details of the war with China, to which we especially invite the attention of our readers. There 18 no news of any political interest in the French Journals of Wednesday. The Chamber of Deputies is .engaged with the verification of election returns, always a disagreeable part of the business of the session. Madrid Journals of the 27th ult. have reached us. i They bring no news of any interest. On the Bour se on that day two ba.rgains were transacted in the Threes for a million of reals, at 21i, for sixty days ; and 32 bar gains in the Fives for 20,200,000 reals at 30 8-16 i for cash, 301, - 4 1 , 311, at various dates, with the eleven coupons. OLD GLORY AGAIN.-Sir Francis Burdett does not grow wiser as he grows older. Few but must remember his zealous patronage of St. John Long, that remarkable medical genius, whose peculiar lot it was to rub two female patients to death within the short space of twenty four hours, and to enhance the eon - iron and felicity of a third, by boring a hole in her back, about the size of a parish poor-box ; few, we say, but must remember Sir Francis's zealous patronage of this individual, and his startling statement that he had seen a flash of light rubbed out of one of his patient's heads ! Last night the credulous Baronet figured in the House of Commons as the patron of an invention equally extraordinary with that of - St. John Long.; and called on the House to grant a Committee to investigate the merits of a projectile, which' could destroy a line-of-battle ship at the distance of six miles, and with a battery erected at the Isle of Wight, lay Portsmouth in ashes ! Captain Warner, who is the inventor of this tremendous projectile, may really be able to accomplish with it the wonderful feats just alluded to. We pass no opinion on the practicability or otherwise of his scbeme ; but cannot help observing that Sir Francis Burdett's patronage of it, looks exceedingly suspicious, and gives it an appear mice. of quackery, that possibly may not belong to it. If Captain Warner—to use Sir Robert Peel's expres sion—" be blown out of the water," it will not be so much by the Premier's opposition to his claims, as by Old Glory's support of them. SUMMARY OF NEWS AND Vitiate (4:- pluton. " Who runs may read." FOREIGN. The original columns of the Paris journals, received this morning, are full of-comments upon squabbles in the Chamber of Deputies about contested elections. They are of no importance to the English public. A letter from Nuremberg says :—" The highly im portant undertaking of the canal connecting the Rhine and the Danube is near its completion, that portion of it, in the vicinity of Neumark and Altdorf, where stupendous excavations have been required, being accomplished under the direction of M. Spaeth, civil engineer of Nuremberg. The Government had in tended that the whole should be opened by the end of July, but it appears that the line between Nu remberg and Bamberg will be the only part opened to the public this year. Another undertaking connected with the canal, and of equal importance, the establishment of a railroad from Augsburg to the Saxon frontier by Nu remberg and Bamberg, has at length been begun, the King of Bavaria himself taking a lively interest. in it. The delay has been painful to the public, who attributed it to an apprehension in the Government that it would be injurious to the canal; but this railroad will closely unite the north and south of Germany." - The Madrid Journals of the 27th ult., with only cne or two exceptions, censure in the strongest terms the conduct of General Zurbano in Catalonia, which they say is distinguished by barbarity and atrocity towards all who are suspected of being enemies of the Govern ment.. Our readers will remember that this is the Ge neral, who, on taking the coeunand of the district to which he lias been appointed, issued an order for shoot ing any person who, having had the misfortune to be taken by rebels, should consent to pay them ransom for his life and liberty. The Marchioness of Belgida, the Lady of Honour to the Queen, dismissed by Senor Arguelles, her 'Majesty's Guardian, has written a letter to the Peninsular, ex plaining the motives that led to her dismissal. She states that there was an inquisitorial service around her Majesty not required either for the Queen's safety. or that of the State, - and which could only have for effect to degrade the throne and insult the proverbial loyalty of Spaniards. " I believe," says the Marchioness, "imbued as I am with Liberal principles, that a system of frank communi cation would accustom her Majesty to be accessible to all ranks of society, and to receive every individual, without reference to his political opinions. A coterie watches her Majesty's actions and words, and this sys tem of isolation and exclusion I do not think ought to be adapted to form a noble and magnanimous soul, nor a good, indulgent, and conciliatory character. In this state of things I should compromise my delicacy, and my dig nity, and duty, if I became an accomplice in a system that I believe to be bad, and I preserved functions which I could not exercise usefully for my Queen and for my country." - - PARLZAMENTAILY. In the House of Peers Lord Beaumont presented a petition from the Raja of Sattara, and announced his intention to bring forward a motion on the subject, were something not done in favour of the Raja. Several Bills were forwarded a stage by their Lordships, but not Lord Radnor's Bill for repealing the Corn-law. The Noble Earl moved the second reading. and sup ported his motion by a pithy speech. The Earl of Ripon moved that the Bill be read a second time in six months. Lord Kinnaird supported the original motion, but the Earl of Ripon's amendment was carried without a di vision. We have now, we presume, had the last Corn-law debate of the session, and, chiefly in discussing that subject, the House sat till Nine o'Clock. In the Commons Mr. Mackinnon obtained leave to bring in a Bill to improve the health of towns by prohibiting the inter ment of bodies within them. Mr. Cowper supported the motion and no person opposed it. Sir Francis Burdett moved for a Committee to investigate the negotiations between the Government and Mr. Warner. Sir H Douglas spoke against Mr. Warner's invention, and proved that Mr. Warner had evaded giving to the public the proofs that he possessed the great secret of which he boasts. Mr. Brotherton read a letter to prove that Mr. Warner bad made the same promises at Oporto as here. Sir Robert Peel explained the course the Government had adopted, and opposed the motion. Sir F. Burdett pressed it to a division, when it was supported by 2, and rejected by 72. In reply to Mr. C. Buller, the Chancellor of the Exchequer said the Report of the Commissioners to inquire into the Ex chequer Bill affair was ready to be laid on the table, but he was not prepared to say, till he had read the Report, what measures he should take. Lord Ashley obtained an address to the Crown to direct the Commissioners of Mines further to inquire into the appren ticeships in them. A Bill was brought in by Sir J. Graham to confirm the incorporations of certain boroughs, and indemnify parties who may sustain loss. Mr. T. Duncombe moved an address to her Majesty to dis charge Mason, the Chartist lecturer, and others, at present confined in Stafford gaol. Sir J. Graham opposed the motion, which, after a short de bate, was lost. The House was counted out at a Quarter before Eleven on Mr. Hume's motion to lay Papers before Parliament concern ing the Raja of Sattara. MONEY-TRADE-COMMERCE. In Wakefield, every branch of business is reported to be improving a little. The. shawl manufacture at Paisley, which has up to the present time suffered most, has taken a fresh impulse in the factory of Messrs. Holmes and Le Batard, where all bands are employed. The master-tradesmen, resident in Chelsea and its vicinity, held a meeting at the Wellesley Arms on Wed nesday, to investigate the causes of the present distress of the country. A paper was ordered to be drawn up on the subject, and to be laid before the associated members of the Tradesmen's Society of Chelsea, as also the Central Society in the City. At the third annual meeting of the Proprietors of the London and County Joint-Stock Banking Company held in Lombard-street yesterday, it appeared from the Re port that the capital, doWn to the 30th of June, amounted to 118,8751., and a dividend would be declared clear of the " Income -tax " at the rate of 5 per cent. for the half year. At the establishment of the bank in 1838,• the Proprietors had entrusted their Directors with 70,000/, which bad since then increased to 800,0001 EcciaiszesTxcel. At the Londonderry assizes an important and inter esting record was tried. It was the case of Fortescue, executor of Magee, against the Lord Bishop of Derry. The cause of action appeared to be that on the Ist of January, 1836,:the defendant, in consideration of the sum of 2,0001. being paid by Magee, promised to promote his son, the Rev. E. A. Magee to the first benefice in his power, but though he had advanced the defendant a large sum, and was willing to advance the residue, his promise had not been kept by the Bishop, though he had had various opportunities of so doing. The damages were laid at 3,0001., and a verdict was finally returned for the defendant. LAW AND POLICE. Yesterday policeman 83, L division, was charged at Union-hall with assaulting Mary Ann Luxton. He was severely blamed for his conduct and fined 103., which amounts to discharge from the force, the infliction of the smallest penalty being so treated by the Commissioners. Several case; of furious driving' of omnibuses ►ere brought before the Magistrates, at Clerkenwell, yester day, and fines inflicted. The dangers arising from this practice are, however, now becoming so common, that the Magistrate stated he should in future commit to the House of Correction, with hard labour, as the Act em powered him to do. LITERARY AND SCIENTIFIC. The 119th annual festtval of Worcester, Hereford, and Gloucester is announced to take place on the 20th, 21st, 2,2 d, and 23d of September, in the cathedral church of Worcester. THEATRICAL. Rubini's benefit and last appearance at her Majesty's Theatre takes place on Thursday next, the 11th inst. Mademoiselle Caroline, who is looked upon as the finest female jjakx...that ever entere,l the manege, per forms. at VtitTiliir to-night, and adds to the other at tractions of the gardens. COURT-FASHIONABLE. The Duke of Wellington is expected to leave town fur Widmer Castle this day week. The Duke and Duchess of Brdford left town yester day, on a visit to the Dowager Countess of Set'ton, at her villa, near Windsor. The Duke of Devonshire has arrived at Chatsworth from the metropolis. The Marquis and Marchioness of Ely left Belgrave squarc, on Wednesday last, for Ireland. The Marquis and Marchioness of Inndonderry leave Holdernesse House to-morrow, for Wynyard Park. Lord Eliot, Secretary for Ireland, is expected to arrive at Dublin Castle on Friday next. _ _ Her Majesty the Queen Dowager is not expected to visit the Earl and Countess of Brownlow this year. The Marquis of Salisbury is now on his way home from Paris. raTISCEIrdiNECEITS. At a meeting held yesterday in St. Martin's-lane, for the purpose of taking into consideration the recent con viction for Ribbonism in. Armagh, a vote of thanks was awarded to the Morning Chronicle, Sun, and Advertiser, for their "constant and uniform exertions in the cause of humanity and enlightened philanthropy, and their ad vocacy in the above case." Another public meeting on this subject is to be held next Monday night at the As sembly Rooms, Theobald's road. Mr. Williams, the comedian, a favourite actor at the chief provincial theatres, died last Monday at his cottage on the Kilmarnock-road. near Glasgow aged 52. The best books of Lord Lichfield s library were dis posed of at Shugborough on Wednesday, concluding the book-sale, which has realised nearly 1,500/. Yesterday the wine sale commenced, and will terminate this (Friday) evening. The rarest and most attractive part of the sale will be on Tuesday and Wednesday next, when the most splendid specimens of statuary, and scme of the finest pictures in the kingdom, will be brought to the hammer. A magnificent assemblage of rank is expected. Satur and Monday will chiefly be occupied in the sale of the furniture of the smaller bed-chambers. BRUSSELS, AUG. 3. -The average price of wheat last week was 22f. 92c., and that of Rye, 12f. 13c. Baron James Rothschild passed through Brussels yes terday, and had an interview with the Minister of the Interior. He was on his way from Germany to Paris to be present at the marria,ge of his daughter. HAMBURG!! ' AUG. I.—The Gth Report of the General Relief Committee (that appointed by the Go vernment) is published, the amount of the sums received up to the 15th July in the evening was 3,630,000 marks banco (about 270,0001) MONEY and COMM.ERCIAi:: NEWS. CITY, QUARTER .TO 7 1 .K.'REE• The prices of the Funds have rather given . ' the commencement of business, but without it ilkliT.P" s "' sible to assign any particular cause. The' cettOttt!rf* which is probably the most correct bik, 15 • that some parties, anxious to realise, at ila"lat.."; advance, have been selling , iheir stock the public transactions having • been but *v.' and those limited in amount. Consols are now 9137 91; for Money, and for the Account ; Three per Cents. 1le• duced, 91,1 91f,- ; Three and-a-Half per COlts• lied ab ed ; 101 1018 ; New Three-and-a-Half per tie.its- 1004 1008 ; India Stock, 249 251 ; India Bonds, 3S ,; Exche" quer Bills, Old, 51 53 ; New, 49 51 prem. Foreign Securities remain without variation, b.7 641 e 55 ,. has been in Dutch, the Two-and-a-Halt' per Cents. : 513 51 ; the Five per Cents., 1011 ; and in Danish,:. ai 82-4 828. - There has been no quotation for Mexican. - e • Operations in Shares have been confined Western, 90+, the New Shares 63-4 ; Fifths Northern and Eastern, 44 ; and CrOydon, 12: ; market, however, exhibits symptoms of e-mproven tent- The Bonds quoted to-day are Columbian 20,1; S pani sP Five per Cents., 20, and the Three per Cents., 2 V. The commercial letters from India - ,contain, gen.c; rally, more favourable accounts. The pressure 14 11- 4 had for some time existed on the money market greatly subsided, and more confidence was disp le Y," The demand fur European goods at Cdcutta en t or creased, while some advance in prices had taken vine!: Much complaint was made of the heaviness of sto' ,;I• , s ‘ 1 " hand, - and so large were they at Bombay, thm t po r , chases were in most instacces made only or culation, in the expectation of a rise. Althoug E t" intelligence is stated to be more favourable, it still ( Oe no temptations fur shipping, since prices, though ; th have advanced, are in the generality of cases even : below a remunerating rate, but it leads to the expo c tE don that this better condition of affairs is only a.it 41 ' runner of permanent improvement. PRICES OF SHARES THIS DAY AT ONIC- A ILWAYS. Paid. Per Share. Great Western Ditto New . 50 Ditto Fifths London and Croydon (Trunk)... 134 l2 • to - ••;, Northern cod Eastern MANCHESTER STOCK EXCHANGE, AUG. 4.—We4• 1151 0 . had a tolerably steady market. The business done. is oi follows :—Manclaester and Birmingham, 274 28 'ou d Eastern Scrip, 7 i 71 ; Manchester and Salford v Bk Works, 51i ; Plato Glass, . , CL OSING PRICES. BRITISH I UNDS Bank Stock 3 per Cent. Red. ...., y'2l Ditto Bonds ..... ........ 3: ',, 13° 3 per Cent. Con. 3i per Cent. Red 101 Ditto New Annuities .... New 3i per Cent... look lEx. Bills, 1,000/....2d. 49 New 5 per Cen', I Ditto 500/..... . 491. r, Long Annuities to expire Ditto Small tivr Jan. 1860 .. l2 9-16 Balik Stock for Acct — • Oct. 1859 Jan. 1860 — ICom•ols for Acct. FOREIGN FUNDS. Austrian, 5 per cent. ... .--, Portuguese, 5 per cent. --• ' Belgian, 5 per cent Ditto, IVew Ditto ..- Brazilian 80nd5... , Prussian, 45 per cent ..••• Buenos Ayres 6 per cent. Russian, 5 C.O cent •-• Chilian, 6 per cent Ditto, Metallic • .... •••' Colombian, 6 per cent... Spanish, 5 pey cent .... Ditto, 1824 2Ol Ditto, Deferrcli...• . ..... Danish, 3 per cent B2l French, 5 per cont. —f..-' Greek, 1825, 5 per cent — Exchange ...... ..... —f. • " A ' Mexican, 5 per cent — French, 3 per cent- —f- -11 Ditto, 6 per cant. 1837 Dutch, 2i per 0eut........ 'a ' 1 Peruvian,lB2s, 6 per ct. . Ditto, 5 per cent. J .... 10 ' SHARES. Edinburgh and Glasgow (50 paid) ....•• . ... -- Ditto New Shares ( 3 paid .... .... .. . 3k , . Great Western Railway (65 paid) Ditto New Shares ( 50 paid) 64 , Ditto Fifth (4 paid) • London and Brighton (50 paid) . 34 London and Croydon Railway (Trunk) Northern and Eastern (45 paid) . 4.0 i LioHTGOLTSC6IN. " The following notice was issued by the Bout tir morning : Bank of England, August 5, He,' I , The public are informed that, on Monday next b!" 0 Bth instant, and until further notice, light gold coin ., amounts from 101. to 501., will be received in thrill; tunda, at 3/. 17s. 101 cl. per oz. from nine o'clock in. IP morning till three in the afternoon. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. (RECEIVED THIS DAY.) BRIGHTON RACES.---THURSDAY (CONCLUD] 0))' Sweepstakes of 3 sovs. each. . 1 Col. Wyndham's Singleton, 3 yrs 2 5 : 1 1 Mr. Smith's Knightsbridge, 4 yrs 1 6 2 3 Mr. Rush's br gby Requisite, 4 yrs. 7 2 , 3 d ar t Mr. Goodman'a Chummy, 3 yrs Mr. Theobald's Glennary, 3 yrs - Mr. Priaulx's Sister to Cheat, 4 yrs .r 'Mr. Balchin's Affection, 4 yrs The winner was claimed. SALISBURY RACES.—Taussp -4T • , ' ' Sweepstakes of 50 sovs. each, h ft. - CT. Lord G. Bentinck's Peloponnessus, 3 yrs walked of _ f The Stand Plate of 100 soya. added to a liandiesP ° 20 sovs. each. h ft, and 5 only if declared. Two miles.: Mr. Treen's Una, 4 yrs . .• (it tad) I Lord Palmerston's llione, 5 yrs ' ..•.• Mr. Sadler's Defy, 4 yrs, 6st 121 b - - .. Oae m ye.- 0 , . 3 The Gold Cup of 100 sovs. Two miles. i Mr. Herbert's Arctic, aged (Rogers) 5 Mr. Treen's Una, 4 yrs —• , The City Members' late 0f501., added to a Sweepsitak e ' of 10 sovs. each, 3 ft. Mile and three-quarters. - 1 Mr. Etwall's Thistle Whipper, 4 yrs ........ 0 0 1 Lord G. Bentinck's Peloponnesus, 3 yrs.... 1 0 ;dr Duke of Richmond's The Currier, 6 yrs... 0 dr, ,A The Scurry Handicap of 5 sovs. each, with 50 8 , 11 0 "" T.Y.C. ' 1 Mr. Etwall's Palladium, 3 yrs (W. DO') , Mr. Sadler's Bellissima, aged .... 3 Mr. Herbert's Teetotaller, 3 vrs ..... HAVERFORDWESt RACES—TUESDAY.. ~C . The Pembrokeshire Stakes of 20 sovs. each, h ft i " Two mites• 'TS • .(Dodgson) 1 Gou ,h's Faust dr. ig.. _ 4 yrs Mr. Langley's Rumour, 4 yrs Mr. Parr's Rough Robin, 5 yrs ....•••• Mr. Henderson's Seabreeze, 4 rs •*. .......••• The Handicap of 5 sovs. each was won, in two bel t ': by Mr. Henderson's Greedy Sam ; and the Sweepstake" by Mr. Gough's Greenfinch. Handicap Sweeptakes of 1 sov. each, and 50 add ed ' Heats, two miles. . 1 Mr. Gough's Fausta, 4 yrs 2 d f Mr. Parrs Rough Robin, 5 yrs .... 1.. 0 , 0 Sweepstakes of 5 sovs. each, and 25 added.. Heats, t miles. 1 Mr. Langley's Rancour, 4 yrs ..(Bradley) I JO Mr. Parr 's Ate, 3 yrs . ' The Handicap of 3 soya. each, and 20 added, was by Mr. Gough's Greenfinch. NEWPORT (SALOP) RACES—TIJESDAY.' ' i The North Shropshire Stakes of 3 sovs. .rach, and I added. Heats, one mile and a half. 1 Mr. Davies' fby Bran—Greenfinch's dam, 3 ',,vrs .1 $ Mr. Walters' Miss Winney, 4 yrs 2 Mr. Standbank's Hooka, and two others ran. • „ The Newport (Handicap) Stakes of 15 sovs. each, .I 01 "' &c. Thrice round. Mr. Morris's Fat Jack, aged :walked o' e . Thu Cavalry Cup was wen by Taffy, and the Lad y Purse by Brunette. - . . WEDNESDAY. Sweepstakes of 5 sovs. each, with the Stand Purse adde(l' Heats a mile and a hall. t Mr. Arthur's The Star, 4 yrs (Marlow) 0 1 3 Mr. Denham's Souvenir fill s , 4 yrs :3 Mr. Peace's Wide Awake, 3 yrs 3 3 Mr. Standbank's Hooka, 3 yrs Mr. Hewitt's Rebecca, 4 yrs The Aquolitte Stakes of 5 sovs. each, and 20 aid e "' were won in two heats by Mr. llobinson's Finalitv, bea t ; ing Query and two others ; and the Cave. Try flate .l3, Mr. Haynes's Miss Middleton. LLOYD'S SHIPPING--(THIS )'AY / LONDON, AUGUST s.—Wind this day at noon. W.,' , to N.N.E. P.M., light and variable . — . Sld. Anna, d ° ' maica ; Anna, Mondell, Barba'loes. PORTSMOUTH, AUGUST 4.—Wind, 'N.N.W. to Vrt"; Arrd. Tweed (steamer), Southampton, and gone into b Majesty's dockyard to repair yards, &c. CowEs, AUGUST 4.—Arrd. Arno, Dicer, Cuba' left the lith June. OFF TORBAY, AUGUST l.—Maria, Musch,lNe' r ' castle for the Cape ; Mary, St. Thomas, fur Breinro• PLYMOUTH, AUGUST 4.—Wind N. W.—ArreL sador, Howe, Monte Video ; Corsair, Canning, Deu ir rara ; Sarah, Lond o n f or P ort Philip. SM.llclio,, Qitebee' THE MARKETS.-(THIS DAY.) CORN EXCHANGE. The arrivals of English Grain this week have . been moderate, of Irish Oats good, and of Foreign Whet ecnsiderable. English Wheat unchanged in price froto Monday's quotations, and in Foreign there is little dov e ' Barley, BeanO, and Oats, met a dull trade at scarcelY their former value. Flour as last reported. Loud , '" average Wheat, 5,688 at SMITHFIELD. Although the number of Beasts offering at marice f ' this morning were by no means extensive, the Beef trade was hoary at a reduction from Monday's quotation s. Mutton was 2d. to 4d. per stone lower, and trade heavy• In Veal there was little done. Fur Pork the trade is . " 1. heavy, and prices on the decline. The prime qualities 0 ; Lamb only in demand, and the trade dull at reduce(' prices. Beasts, 582; Sheep and Lambs, 12,010 ; rig ° ' 384; Calves, 317. Beef, 2s. Bd. to 4s. 6d.; Mutton. 3 , 3 * to 4s. 2d.; Veal, 3s. to 55.; Pork, 2s. to 4s. 2d. ; Lanw' 4s. 4d. to 4s. Bd. COLONIAL MARKET. There was a strong demand for most articles, and 171' 10 continue much the tame as last week. TEA MARKET. TALLOW MARKET. The prices of this article were firm, and there $ 4115 rather more business dune by the chandlers at 48s. 0 1l the spot ; fine Yellow C an dl e f or d e li very i n th e 19°t three months at 48s. Gd. per cwt. WHITECHAPEL HAY MARKET. The supply was middling, and the demand good for bes t qualities, with prices steady. Clover, 21. 10s. to sl. 10s.; Hay, V. ss. to 4L 4s. ; New Hay, 31. to 4/. ; Straw/ 11. 10s. to 11. 14s. SHOCKING ACCIDENT.—A voungman named 111 1 ' ham Sewin, employed as a " fly boy," as it is called, on our double cylinder printing machine, accidently got on ° of his arms entatled in the machinery, cutting off th g hand just above ti e wrist, and crushing and mutilating the arm in a sho king manner. The accident was occa' sioned by carele: sneis on the part of the injured lid.- - Boston Mai. ~--- - - cpAII i $1414. / 11'ro Invt.4 utcb a t A() iCaSV it , 9 firllo W a .1 , ,i0g . h do ~t i Vonittn.s tecimpn, I • less than ~ The p 4,131 P The S: Mr. IT, littitkrup 4 , , Potted tit Mr. against tl H„ > 1 ) ;: l merchant the rluty tit! ) All.. 111 Curulty , Mr. 1,1 .Mnday or Ipswil Mr. G Aft.. G-] Sir R. Commissi would be - The C] -.!lvould be 'Mr. 3, Ron. • 13 Q. J. t'")...procce cot This B The II On Clitl latlY9 CO' • Air. o'l ments agi this mod( protested tution of full °ppm of the cc Committc jetted to right of • Mockery- Assembly these ten fifteen by lentatives they (the in the Ch. unjust, or l been cons should tric Ccs it to 0 / 1 4tted. Lord S' !Man that - by means circumsta rejected t ducci to ti 9f the col into one. of the col tinct Asst rest in su nominees Crown. 'that there Cro - 6 11 a s tke discre 'the remut 'were tar 1 • iberefore, - med Le u were apf flue:teed. Mr. V. of this cl my way Stegislativ V. Smith' temporal') 'Dent, sue' Australia, fears of h :af they ab land the I should pri Z, 0 - Tear, an , ground fi lwould, ho *would be existed in touse of Ask t tie N Legis: should be the Unite that was.i that effec this was to favour Mr. P. • 4- )n the pi the reduc or five, while so the delib wamping the politic Mr. II mere -unt e:„ 11 01 V .hOu that of r agement L espeet. rii hen at al to any 'Aternbor injustice. been allel gerations Ng that lished, it Nhotild appointee think "ti 4 . )lit the t ) Ught to Pleasure, Friend ii means, tl Mr. IN Must con That' ou; stltutton Worthy t %list cor injury to punish fi accused. _The C F F On of • A.lr- ( elause to the Legi of ten. -Mt.. I Lord Iron. a❑ fifteen \winner then cor so,doiK tarty .0 proporti : lit After 'Atl i , The I Lord be add shall ni • finance. i Were r • 011 que.s princip agreed money out, ot concur the ret the opi these / greater Nowfo all th upon Assem money island, on tht keep laud m It was SOnle 1 the pr Th( Lori —,bi