The Sun. — London, England, 1815-04-22 00:00:00

"i" ~;~~ . • statice of the subject not yet being before us in. inch a shape that We can take Parliamentary n - tice of it. Is it the intention of the Noble Lord - to bring file Treaty soon before us In . a shape that we can take Parliamentary notice of it ? If such is not his intention, I must proceed to some other course. I do not choose to trust myself at this moment with the expres sion of the sentiments which arose in my Mind svhen I read this instrument. 1 certainly did not think it was genuine. But if the Noble Lord will not bring the i busines.sbefore us in a shape that \vitt enable List() discusS it in a Parliameutaey way, we mnst proceed to its discussion out of tire Par liantentary`'Way. There is not a man in the House who has read that paper„,who will not say that the House st-Commons will abandon its duty, if it des not take the earliest opportenity of offering, its advice to the Crown on this sebjeet, Lord CASTLEREAG-11.-7lt is not out of the course of Parliamentary usage, to bring forward eanotion for discussion of this Treaty, in the shapein-which . _the flight Hon. Gentletnau finds it . ; and Perna- . ment may, .if it thinks proper, give its advice to the Crown, on the supposition of the Crown being -rip - the point. or entering into any engagement Which it may consider injurious to the interests of the Country. What I mean, to say is this, that it would be. improper in me to bring the document before Parliament iu the unratified shape in which it is, and when it iS not binding on those Powers who are-the parties to it. This would be taking the sense of Parliament on a step which could not come properly before it in relief of our own res ponsibility. His Majesty's Ministers, however, take a more correct and constitutional line. We• have obtained the sanction of Parliament for the adoption of precautionary measures, but no sanc tion for any other measures ; and for these we rest otim our own responsibilify. 'But it would be allowed that it is always' competent to the Ministers of the Crown to advise war if they think proper, subject to their Own discretion and responsibility..'• His Majesty's - Ministers wouldzbe acting in . a most'unconstitutional, and not only an unconstitutional, but a pusillanimous Man lier, if they endeavoured to extort from Parlia ment in an imperfect state of informationya sanc tion for those measures which they might ulti mately adopt. But if any Hon. Member con ceives that advice Ought to be given to the Crown, not td act in a manner which he conceives is likee ly to compromise the country, and lead to mea= sures injurious to our own interest and the geee ral interest of Europe, it iseertainly competent to such Honourable Gentleman to raise the question in the House and to bring it under discussion. But it is not competent to his Majesty's Ministers to take the initiative of bringing it before. Parlia ment, and of taking the sense •of Parliament on imperf-et information. Mr. WHIT,BREAD—The Noble Lord has used a new, word, which he seems to have borrowed front Congress .; for I do not. recollect to have, ever beard the'word initiative made use of in this House before. If be will not take the initiative, as he is pleased to Callit, in this measure, in the choice of difficulties to which we. are reduced from that cirenrustance, knowing, as we do, the deep plunge made by his Majesty's Government towards war, without the question being regularly before it, the House must pause before it grants any further supply for what was called defensive preparations, when it it knows that the Government will con vert those measures of defence into measures of offence—aind into a war which will be pro secuted not only in the most disgraceful, . but the most hopeless manner. My, duty calls on me to propnse aft adjournment of the House, till the Noble Lord is able to conia b e f ore us with the terms of tins Treaty ; and I hope - Par liament will not be guilty of such indiseretion, as to suffer the Noble Lord to proceed until he' has pionged the country into a situation without re nkedy—when he %yin come before us with the whole weight of his responsibility, and which responsibility, 1 hope, the Honse will make I;iin feel is Hoe a mere Parliamentary, term, (Hear, hear !) but a word of real weight ; ..and'that af ter talking of it, and vepouring . about it fOr yeate, the tinie is now come when we shall turn the name into the thing, and make him feel what it really is. 'tinder these circumstances, my proper course is, in a constitutional-and Parliamentary . manner, V . ' prevent the supplies from being granted, till I know the situation in which the country is: Lord CASTLEREAGH. —The Hon. Gentleman will never find me disposed to Shrink from any responsibility which 1 have incurred. With- re spect to the course of the Hon. Member, I Inuit say that it certainly does not consist in arming the ExeCutive Government with those powers which are necessary for it in the preSent arduous situation of affairs. If time Hon. Gentleman is not dispos'ed to coecur in those measures which ills Majesty's Government have tbougla advisable in the present situation of the country, it is not on the subject of Supply that he ought to raise. the question—he -ought to raise it on its own me rits, (Hear, hear, from the 'Ministerial side!) If: the. Hon. Gentleman is "determined to .persist in this course, it is a proof that lie shrinks from she merits of the questiOn, (Hear, bear, front the - Opposition !) I repeat it again--ii is a proof.of . :his shrinking from the merits of the question—' 1, on the contrary, to-night, bars afford ed him every facility for bringing the question torward in a regular manner. Every person must be convinced-, that the Treaty, cannot be laid before, the House in its present saute 'by; ids Majesty's Ministers, without their acting in' a manner inconSisteut with the duty . which they . owe to their country ; and I consider, therefore, t h e measure which the Hon. Gentlemau - . has chosen to pursue, with the view of ,obstruCting hi s Majesty's GOverninent, as only granting with 1 -1 bad grace what must at last be granted, and ecndering that strength which the House - have ctwimitted to the Crown inadequate to its object. .1f the Ilon. Gentleman is sincere iu t h e intention .%vh,Sch he has announced of impeaching me, and if he ws'slies at time same time to strengthen the Executj,-e, let him bring the que , stiOn forw ar d on its own nu: - !rits ; but let Jahn not make this a pre. text for wea - erting the anus -of the Executive Go vernment in ttl'e arduous crisis in which the coun try is at present placed—(fond cheering on the .31inisterial side of t.,Se Mr. Wur.rzmicAD.,-Wi.i.cn I granted the sup. plies, I understood from the Noble Lord that there was still an alternative left ; and though I told some of my friends near me that they would soon very likely find themselves dupeil l , still I had the authority of the Noble Lord and. the Chancelloi of. the Exchequer that there was an•alternative of peace or war. But. now I learn that there is no longer an•alternatlve ; and that if I give them any further supplies, it_ cannot be for defence, .but for offence„ and in a cause the-most desperate and hopeless.... To the Ministers ‘vlto could make this .Country a party'to such'a Treaty, .even after a. vote fur strengthening the bands of•Governmene —after what r beat: of 'their- conduct, 1 cats' no longer, consistently with niY duty, entru.st , the supplies--(lleac, hear l).—The Noble -Lord-lras. talked of the facility which helms giVen us. What facility has he given us ? allowiog us to de bate on a Treaty which he says is iinperfectly be fore us. Will the' Noble Lord tell us, the nature of the Treaty? Jle bas told us already iii4t the one we have seen it substantially inaCcurate„and,thus • we shall • go to a' discussion, trusting to be in formed, in the course of-the debate; what is the.dif lerence between the treaty which . we have seen,and the real one-. And:this is what he calls-affording : us facility 1 He toes me the additional favour to tell me how I ought to conduct myself as a Meta-. ber of Parliament. The public are better judges of my conduct than't amr; but sure I am, what 'ever their opinion may be, I will not go to the Noble Lord fur advice. Upon these grounds, and convinced as I ant, chit the line of conduct which am pursuing is one that is constitutional and proper, and !lie only one which can be followed I with interest or adtantage to the country, I §ball ' certainly perSist in it, thoagh the one which the Noble Lord has pointed out would, 410 doubt, be more advantageous to . himself : and _when the Noble Lord 'pointed out the line or conduct which he conceived proper for me, I believe he r \ attier expressed his own opinion than the course which the country would expect or wish me to follow. Lord CASTGEREAGH.-Wheuever the Honour able Gentleman thinks lie has sufficient grounds for instituting a motion for censure of me, I-be lieve this is a duty which he will not fail to dis charge; and so long as . I see no-notice tp that purpose entered on,the book, I shall feel satisfied that there is no ground in the Honourable Mem ' ber's mind to warrant'hint in such a course. Will the-House listen . to the Honourable Gentleman's proposal for withholding the Supplies and -weaken ing the hands of Gthvernment, on grounds which . the Honourable Member will not bring forward oil their own merits ? Sir J. NEWPORT.--I had a right when I dis sented from my Hon: Friend (Mr. Whitbread) on a late occasion, to consider that there was still an alternative left—that war was not then determin ed on—and I now find out that I am duped by the' Noble Lord-=--(llear, hear !)—and that to the Noble Lord I ought not to have given credence, tar the 'nuestiOn Which he , told me was pending, was actually determined. 'The Noble Lord tells us now that the Treaty, with some substantial inac curacies, is correct. He gives us in his usual way an answer, and a qualified answer, so as to put it out of our power ever to fix any precise opinion on him. But that night the Noble Lord tdltl us expressly that there was no decision, and that when the decision was a!;:ea f ly taken. Ile now said that we ought not to rouse the supplies which were given for an alter native, but which alternative did trot exist. I cannot very well conceive what the Noble Lord means by using the words, not shrinking from re sponsibility, because he is - certainly shrinking from responsibility if he (Foes not give in this do cument.—Whea wi)l th,. Noble Lord give it to us When it will be too late for us to save the country fi'om des:truction—from a renewal of a war Which has sunk our finances to the state in whip h they now are, xvh:cli has ground to the dust every class of the community. Then the Noble. Lord will give it when it is too late. As to the boast ed responsibility of the Noble Lord at such a pe riod, it would be nothing worth. What .com pensation:would it be then to the country,even if ,ive were to follow, the Noble .Lord to the block-? Before war is determined on, the House olighho lave,an opportunity of interposing their advice. The course of my lion. Friend.is regular and con stitutional. When Parliament has not sufficient documents to enable it to form a judgment, it is the only legal method of preventing the abuse of power. When One sees, Ministers treating in a :double sense, with the public- 7 when we see our selves on the point of a renewal of .the calami ties which were brought on ns by the War of . 1794, and involved again by the very same'actsl which were then practised ; a war which has re duced every man's income to a third of its value, and then we are told of: the responsibility of Mi nisters, it is impossible to preserve our tempers, Sir, I scorn such a responsibility—(Hear i .hear !) My Hon. Friend, whom the Noble, 'Lord has thought Ifit to advise, has sat in thiS Home infi nitely ronger than the Noble Lord himself, and he -has done the duty of the country, unpaid, unsa laried, and unstipended, and the love and grati tude of his country will follow hitn. Lord CASTLEREAGI4.—AS to the eulagy pro nounced by the Right Honourable Baronet ou. his friend, it is one in which I am by no means dis-. posed to concur. The Right Honourable Baronet ' has Proceeded in a manner which is certainly cal culated to lie painful to the feelings of the person to whom he is opposed. I conceive that it is not. inconsistent;to strengthen the hands of the Crown, and at tire same time give it good advice. If there is an i;npression on the mind'of any Honourable ; Mei - fiber, that,a certain course is in the contem plation of - his,Majesty's Ministers, it •is open to hip . to move the House to give advice to the - CriAwn on the subject ; and,, therefore to obstruct the supplies rather than offeradvice to the Crown, is not tiny sense 'necessary. With respect,to the line of conduct which his Majesty's Ministers have pursued, I deny peremptorily that there has been any delusion whatever. I should have trespassed in the line of duty which I ought to have pursued had I thrown . myself-then on the House, and said . that war .was- either taken or not • taken. I gave no opinion to the House, on the probability of either peace or war. I merely stated that we were placed in such a case of exi gency as ought to. induce us 'to .strengthen the literals of Governinent for either War or peace, and ' ~ ~-:.r. respecting wlaicliMinistert wood . aftetwarktonie to,Payliament. Right 'Hoit llarona' says, that There then no alternative. What the probability of war was, I left to the House to ,collect. I said that. the principle on which his Ma jesty's Minist e rs placed the general system of war or - peace; would be mainly influenced by the ge neral feeling of the powers. • with whom we act-;.;- and however 'highly the light. Hon. baronet may led himself warranted in zOncltuling from the do-: cument that there is no Aternative,, we ought not to.conclade that an instrumentAlopted.under one course of circhinstances, is to.tte conclusive under circumstances of a d;fierent description. Mr. WHITBREAD.--I wish to say one tvot' d more, .A single ray - Of light his broken in, upon (rota thd speeolt olthe,Noble Lord, TheNobleLOrd' has said; that when he sees no riotice.on. the book he shall 'always conclude that I 11ave ,no,groimds • for'eensure, I may have -sufficient grannas, for. .censure; but I_ hive. • also sufficient . experience of Parliament; to`, kiwi what the influence of the. Crwrn 'is. He knows .what the country, gives. to the CrOwn, and the country what lid has given to the Crown. AIr.IIETnuEN believed the, Noble Lord ,pos "sessed the confidence of the . country ; . which re niained yet unshaken. He had his' entire confi dence. Sir JAMES MACKINTOSH .would not agree with the hints that had been thrown out that this was a petty proceeding, a mere squabble about papers ? What papers ? Why, a Treaty,w4th four-of the greatest Powers in illr)yorld. lie. would agree that all hearts and bands should united• in the cause of the country, lint only as-far as they can agree in conscience. , He : would -ask, if..-....eyery - Member ought not to. baye an opportnnitY of -accurately knowing the. substance q a Treaty.of such importance bailie_ the first discussion-of it'? He Wished to know if the Noble Lord would. be disposed Co give theta 'some information respecting it, informally, _as had been done, if be...-was not mistaken, when the Treaties were , conducted with Sweden and Russia, and the nnratified.Subsidiary Treaty of Chaumont. Would the Noble _ - Lord take what had passed this day as a notice, and consent to give the substance of the Treaty'? Mr. METHUEN denied .that be had: given any abstract applause to the condu,et of Lord Castle reagh—in this instance received his - full 4ppro bation (Hear," hear !),. He tl ought that, he might fairly accuse the other side o f the House with giving abstract and systematic opposition to every measure of GovernllleHl, under whatever dream- , stances it might be adopted (Hear, hear !). Lord. CASTLEREAGH observed, that for the rea sons he had before stated, he should decline laying the substance of the Treaty before the House, unless a distinct motion were made upon the sub , , ject, and then he' conld state his "opinion, and adopt such conduct as he knight deem expedient. Lord MILTON begged to know on what day the Treaty kti question had been received by Govern ment ? Lord CASTLEREAGEI answered, that he should be prepared to give every information•on a future day. - . 111 r. BENNET inquired whether that part of the published copy were contained in the authentic thicurne - nt,in which the Allies were made to de clare that they would bring to justice all'sueh persons as shall have joined, or may hereafter join, th€ party of Napoleon e wished- to lino'.v whether that provision had been ratified by the British Government • • • Lord CASTLEREAGII had no Objection to' state, that that part was decidedly -incorrect-5111)51 . 1n.. hilly inaccurate.- • Lord .111}LION, asked, whether this Treaty was in the hands of Ministers before the 7th Ap the day on which the Noble Lord had obtained the Address ? • Lord CASTLE REAG,II replied in the affirmative, and added, th:►t he was pnvared to contend that there was 'lathing at all inconsistent between the terms of the Address an 4 of the Treaty. . • Mr. TIERItiE . Y regretted that. the Noble Lord had any objection to produce the substanCe of the Treaty. Loft! CASTLEREAGFI-1 have 'not stated that I Bail any objection.. Mr. WHITBREAD-7D(CS the Noble Lord mean to say, that if 'a motion be now made will pro duce it ? Lord CASTLEREAGH answered, that lie could not undertake to lay it before the House upon an immediate motion, if not in courtesy to\his Col leagues, Whose opinions he wished to receive, b u t in courtesy also to thc! Representatives. of other Powers, whose interests were alike affected. Mr. WurrßaEAD regretted that the Noble Lord had not saved_ the time of the House by earlier making such- a statement. .Was he now to under stand, that if a motion were made on Monday fur the substance of the Treaty, it would -meet with the compliance of the:Noble Lord ? If so, he would of course move for it, and then the subject would be fairly and cleat ly before the House. Lord CASTLEREAGH ..said, that be would enter `into no compact. He was surprised that the Hon. MenYher should so long have remained in the dark, for the whole course of his (Lord C.'s) reasoning was intended to show, that at the proper time he should not think it inconsistent with his duty to lay the substance.of the Treaty upon the table.— All h e wou ld say a t present was, th a t h e s h ou ld b e prepared on Monday to,give the lion. Gentleman a distinct answer. Mr.'WHITEREAD observed, that on Monday be should make the motion without entering into ar gument, in order to ascertain whether the Noble Lot ti's sense of. duty Would allow him to produce what wai required, in order thattheHouse should not be .plunged into, a discussion that might be disadvantageous to the country. He.should.make the motiotl he(ore the Coins ittee of . Supply. Mr. PoNsoNßv wished to know distinctly, whe ther, On "Monday, the Noble Lord would consent to, produce the substance of the Treaty lie pro tested anainst. bei ng compelled to discuss., the merits OfthiS Treaty or to, ve-ntiou, without pre cise information .upon its nature. • Lord CASTLEREAGH congratulated the House on the pacific tone that had been recently assumed by the other side of the_ House, and that opinioDS apparently so . hostile had.,. been reconciled in a inanfier so satisfactory—(Hear ! and laughter). Air. WHITBREAD observed l . that as the Noble , ..,........a...--- At i l ili *Lord bad been die Dettion G ' t -114 —9 ,or .ow° . 0 , o now he was metamorphosed iota. the Genisoble Lord had at first .said-, no man could have ` il p;o 4 pat r ed t what had recently fallen from his li P : s. , illot: he Was peifectly ready to grant.evcry hltstle' Was required. (No ± No ! - from L o r a s eall t '' reagh.) i Yes,, he would grant all that %vas N . 01) Nell, ,substance of : the Treaty. (Nt„,' 1 , j( lifr ell, diet), the fact would be known 011 LV J°. s e it . , CO 31 •• ;and 'Mr: Whitbread had no disposition anew storm by further contention. h herd . Lord CASTLEREAGH.---1 cannot see t -- , t 'fi'l ai t . s tp, a p i bt l o y eve,c i a n u atter oG.di'fference betlire - en 05 1-I( ' ' ' . O t ! Honourable Member does -tiot, 1108"e/erre! Or afraid or o s t ae,s ff . i ll y ris: c pc o ria n si d si t e t i c o. tt,hiantgidoll.,•aatnlt .n a o ro t 5 5 0 °1.. 0 ? 11 ,, „ i il# t, 11 ,1; . . 'IV r W ;..i.sz . 1-11T11 R EAD.—The fear express,-- , art os-: oble Lord is quite unfounded as tIY ; r, for a would.have .been•if I had ever hestowo! it + • . the fact is, that he never received a sc`ti-f l'ls' applause from me during the whole course ° , political life. .• • 6 1 r . The question was then put - , and it was °Ja l et 011 that the House at its riiing should inPur- Monday: • bt • - PBOPEIITYTAX. brat' The CHANCELLOR of the ExcnEovEn . i s tie in the New Property TaX Bill. On Ale q u '' e that it be read a first time, lye Mr. J. GRANT he should 0005 measure on the second reading. ate Mr. GIIENFELL e4lained the 'vote be b lo ta the minority on the former night, which ' i bt, is intended to produce the delay of a fort"higt ld h proposed by Mr. Brand. The events 1-3 t s° ' -recently occurred induced tins to think th 3 0 0 0 a measure was necessary, under two °l. s boa l4/ modifications :-I..That the Property be rendered more equAl, by lessening theto 500'. upon persons whose incomes were front a-year,---2. That incomes derived fro:" ; r e': professions should not pay in the siir e n : tyl lion as incomes derived from fixed Pr ° r, - „ r e etl '- That sonic ,regulations should be diminish the inquisitorial powers of.t h ,, e missioners on aflairs of Taxes in Soniersrt-ireptle: Mr. ELLIs supported the Bill, but ree°'"nmisiP that a Committee should be appointed to / °11)( of the fit modifications. Mr. GORDON opposed-the tts . diu po , NEWPORT. t allg" 4 the c.„ a ",,,,iA Mr. BeNsoN-bore testimony -to sentimetrt in Liverpool in favour o f- the . I ' er If Tax. It. gave Ministers Cott greater °"lo.'beel)..,, cause taxes to-the same amnt would " iota' raised by other Bills, if not by that to the House. Mr. C. 'WYNNE regretted the espenuit-dilK which we here exposed, but t hnugbt 1° 4 ,1 measure calculated to meet the ditlicoirY• „ e Mr. BARING did not admit that any 10454)ci introc co, taken place in the public opiniOn thi,P.it last year, but In. was trilling to allow that i s e co'' s 4 be prudent to adopt it for one year the machinery was already prepared ; t htit • it would enable Government to Cie with P goer and decision which might at 8 S P -e •og r to a new war. Air. PONSONRY ridiculed the idea of g'; of the Tak at the end of the year. I t i ` "- ste e suppose that this new war, in "'I li" I;i' t-d e ' b e to ,c 1 0-0 about to be involved, would soon Mr. Alderman ATKI.Ns further eni t ' rce( t ceisity of . modifications, without &minis.' amount of the Tax. ltee' Mr. W. Smin-Crecommended a Convi' Si' The House divided on an Amendw e ' lt NEWPORT'S, when the numbers were 0 Foe the Bill being read a first time, 7g-Agn t ' cCP . The Bill- was then read a first, ' ail" e . be read - a second time on Monday. twos tl The second reading of the Alien DI" (livi,'i„`):o moved, and the House was cleared fo r 3 The v Which, however, did not take pla eo." " r was read a second time. ard o: t p he o , N ci a l s a k n e c t e l 1 , o %s r • h o e t ther t been Mr. a press the second reading of-the Proper''Y on Monday. I r e 3" The CHANCELLOR of the ExcuEay .E3 " ---. 1/0 1 CALL OF-THE HOUSE. `Sir J. NEWPORT said, that as h 3 co ol es f i s o il a Bill which imposed 14 Millions of t ° ,. e itlio ° ,lll. country in a manner generally odiou s ` t ' e " 5 10 11 ' full attendance, at least in one stage) t give notice that he would on Moitd 9 Y 111°‘_ dots of :the - House for Thursday ne% l :„ . , , a n dyed l l i t s P o c i b l o i t t o • c c r i y l m A n n n i :i t o l t i r t e d i d o ` n o ß n li i Wednesday.ll went t ill was ra r o d u h s e _ e a "' c j o l a t i— tn e i 't tees t si. ;: ' r 'AlondaYlpt, , W s was ordered to he read a third time on 0 be pi& The Irish Treasury Bills Bill . d the Irish .3) s bo,.. tion Bill were read a third time and assed. Lord IWGENT gave notic • thatox P t y o ' n - bet wee o oo o9lo more, that the Papers respecting lets, and ay American Privateer the he recferretito a„C,,„vde,„re Mr. LOSHINGTON brought in the Bleaching J;i4 which was read a first time.—To 3 be read a se° Monday.—Adjourned to Monday. aßfixt:crl-1 410,1t1.1:4;°0111,1,ti ~.................--- 6 1 ' C s2llsiiisri,ttell‘,.casitcle OAL •,IN,lsAliitillin7Es'ori,d/.1.71:422:: . ocia. p it t ,o ic:i i i s s . , ti , , , 30. ' . 4 Sunderland . 3 tii. , Vl' ....____ . BIRTHS. c Hand' ter On the 10th inst. at Arbuthnott-f-fouse, - , e u s e countess Arbuthuott, of a daughter. ' rt.o ol. t 1 On Thursday, in Upper Charlotte-stree , the wife of Thomas Cadell, Esq. of adaughter. ta i hoto f e , MAItRiEI). of 113Ti bic t On the 16th inst. M. S. Warburgh, E5q.,,.„. of - Sophia, eldest daughter of Joseph Isreets, -cut-streetli 0! I f , ...............y.......•............+...-- , tor l '•o l, ` : . • DIED. • COP lt i r • ~ at toe tic On the 1 Rth inst. aged 83, at her hells' f the . . c o s 0 Rii;lit Hon. Lady Frances Maria Flood, relict o . , ir gai or osg Hon. Henry Flood - , and seventh Daughter i ot•' . • t he 1 . 0 ,J. rcsford„ Second Earl of Tyrone, the night 1 -I ,. ° .`vater t t o• De L:t Poet, and Sister to the late Marqui s ''',corLc',,lel 'Dr. Long•dcld, a distinguished Physician, 0. 1 , , 01" , cf Od the lath inst. at his seat, Prinlinath s ofil c shire, Thoulas Dayly Howell, Parade, Jani e e ll. On the , 14t1i inst. on .•ntith Parade Ba th ' • 'jog s "' e , , 0 V.,sq. late of the Island of St. Vincent's• ~,t c 0' , e ll r' 0 " Monday l a 4 t:' Bryan Crowther,: ' S q' rijfitl e'S .44 , court, Carey-street, Surgeon to I3ethletu U 9— li ffi ":o# pitals. Lad 0 °) ..----------/-''' On Tnesday last, at Little Ealing, i‘liddlese,,c;erber On FridaY the ith lust. • t ICdderaninster, Le : d I . 1.30 i Esq. aged 40. . fv: 4.11,1.11,4 /0.4. , • ...................................... 1 , C i .i 0 0' : ............—............,—..... a , iil q, I" . 4 V ,tiO LONDON :'=c (Printed be .1. B. CARSTI":,,:q'Sy (' L - 1 0 " of , ‘ Aitliidirn-s s;. and published by \‘',,,k• S,, tie re , i ldi It e 55 t a %i t t ' l h :, Clrudcir(•s),FLPlect'tEe'rsN(l')esitl•72pa,i'Sd)tr,;(c! ' li; „ .j ' a st IA 3 /~ N~ V