The Sun. — London, England, 1824-05-25 00:00:00

_ s 66S a Bacon , s Qd 5717 cico FA 4 , 4 (. 141 • -11' • Zi , ~••'- •. kw. ~~ ` ,~<~'y SUN. 45s 0,1 _ s od _sod_s ild ~; ~l 46i Oa od NUDIBER 9890. TUESDAY, MAY 25, 1824. PRICE Sti-tNPEXCEr' iS Olit 3 F; e 3 n 5 , ; ,Send head• is 6d a Os a 04 —oat 5 od; ,0.. ROYAL ACADEMY, SOMERSET PLACE. THE EXHIBITION of the ROYAL. ACA DEMY is now OPEN. Admission (from Eight o'Clock till Seven), Is. Catalogue, Is. HENRY HOWARD, R.A. Sec. MISS GOODALL'S CONCER.T, NEW ARGYLL-ROOMS.—Miss GOODALL has the h i ). nnitr to announce, that her BENEFIT CONCERT will take P ia " on Wednesday Evening next, May 26th, to commence at calf -past Eight o'Clock. -- Principal Vocal Performers : Madame Ronzi de Begnis, Miss Paton, Miss Goodall, Miss A .,' 4 % - se, Miss H. Cawse (Pupils of Sir George Smart), and 4 1 ▪ ' 5 Stephens • Mr. Braham, Mr. Sapio, Mr. Terrail, Mr. r,'; awes, Mr. Ph illips, Mr. Horncastle, and Signor De Begnis. , ;.rineipal Instrumental Performers :—Grand Piano Forte, Mr. -N 'ate ; Violin, Mr. Mori ; Harp, Mr. Bochsa ; Flute, Mr. ; Leader of the Band, Mr. Mori ; Conductor, Sir ▪ tl'rge Smart. nil particulars of the Concert are given in the printed bills, ',Lucile with Tickets, half a guines each, can be had at the rincipal music shops, and of Miss Goodall, 86, Great Port and -street. EQUITABLE ASSURANCE OFFICE. AQUARTERLY GENERAL COURT - of , this SOCIETY will be holden here on THURSDAY, ‘ 44 3d of Jona next, at Eleven o'Clock precisely. WILLIAM MORGAN, Actuary. NUTPONEMENT.—CHURCH ENLARGING SOCIETY. THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING of the SOCIETY for promoting the ENLARGEMENT and BUILDING of CHURCHES and CHAPELS, will be theekt at the FREEMASONS' TAVERN, on WEDNESDAY, it , 2d of June, at Twelve o'Clock pi ecisely. 41 4 Grace, the Archbishop of CANTERBURY in the Chair. The ANNUAL REPORT will be laid before the Meeting, v a nd as it will then be proposed to take into consideration the 4111 tusted State of the Funds, the attendance of the Fri ends °E tha Society is particularly requested. W. JOHNSON RODBER, 16 1 Dukastreet, Westminster, Sub -Secretary. May 18, 1824. EAST INDIA HOUSE, M 3 Y 12. 1824. E COURT of DIRECTORS of the UNITED COMPANY of MERCHANTS of ENG -11,4ND TRADING to the EAST INDIES , do hereby give That a GENERAL COURT of the sa i d C o mpany w ill be held at th e i r H ouse in Leadenhalt-street on WEDNES ,m 41 % the 26th Instant, at Eleven &Clock iu the forenoon , " 0 r the purpose of laying before the Proprietors, agreeably to the By-law, cap. 1. sec. 4, the Draft of a Bill, entitled, Bill fur enabling the Commissioners, acting in exec ution of an agreement made between the East India Company and the Private Creditors of his late Highness Ameer Sing, formerly Rajah of Tanjore, deceased, the better to cat ry the same into effect." A Copy of the said Bill and Deed of Ag.-eenrent, is open at this Honse for the perusal of the Proprietors. The COURT of DIRECTORS do further give Notice, that at the said General Court there will be laid before the Pr,- Prietors, for their approbation, agreeably to the By-law, cap. 6. sec. 18, the Copy of a Resolution of the Court of Di rectors of the esth January last, granting to the Carnatic Commissioners, so long as they shall be employed in the doubl e duty of investigating Claims upon the Carnatic and Claims upoil Tanjore, a special Allowance of 8001. per an num each, from the Company,/ in. addition to the allowance of 1,5001. per annum, at present enjoyed by them under the Carnatic Deed, and fixing tbeir allowance from the period "then either Commission shall cease, at 1`,5001. per annum, to continue aolung as they way be employed under the re maining Commission. and to be paid should the remaining Commission he the Caruatia Commission, as at present, and should it be the Tanjore Commission, from the Company'S cash. Copy of the said Resolution is open at this House for the Perusal of the Proprietors. JOSEPH DART. Secretary. On the Ist of June will be published , n URIKA.; a TALE from the FRENCH. Printed for James Cawthorn, Cockspur-street ; where tnq be had HOBHOUSE'S JOURNEY, in company with Lord BYRON, through ALBANIA, and other Provinces of ,„, 'AIRREY in Europe and Asia, including a Life of Ali Pasha, 4 vols. 4to, second edition, 51. ss. boards. This:Day were published, In One Volume, Bro. price 7s. in boards, THE DIFFICULTIES of INFIDELITY. By the Rev. G. S. FABER, B. D. Rector of Long Newton. Printed for C. and J. Rirington, 62, St. Paul's Church-yard ; and 3, Waterloo-place, Pall-mall. To T. TAYLOR, Esq, No. 9, New Bridge-street, London. . - HONOURED SIR, IBEG leave to inform you, that ever since the year 1790, I had been afflicted with the Lues Venereal, Which from its obstinately resisting every course o f m edicine Prescribed by the most eminent of the facul t y h ere, and un dergoing severalserere courses of salivation, and twice dis charged from the Hospital with little relief, wisuld appear to b e of the mast inveterate nature. In tic spring of last year eisorder had got to such a bead, as nearly to put a period ' 0 soy existence—l had a large ulcer on the crown of my head, 4511 e en each arm,, and my legs were broke out in a frightful manner; my right was dreadfully painful, and had been in a state of ulceration for the last seven years; my left had also tW O large nodes on it, was very much discoloured, and gave me such excruciating pain, particularly when warm in bed, n early to deprive me of rest ; in, this lamentable .state, I was recommended by Mr. J. Thompson, (who received so great a cure by them here), to take your Leake's Patent Pills, Which I began.to do on the 26th 0. May; in the course of a fortnight I began to receive benetit—io- little more than a mouth the ulcers on my head and anus were soundly healed— sums after, the sores oa tny legs healed also ; leaving, how. crer cousiderablediscolouration in the skin, and pain in the bone of the left, which, by the blesaing of God, an.l a little longer pet severance in your. invaluable Medicine, subsided; the nodes dispersing, the skin regaining its natural hue, mai 11 4 nocturnal pains gradually going nil.—l thus became, by r liberal advice and medicine, perfectly free (ruin all my former complaints—bave recovered my former spirits and -strength, and am become jolly and fat , in w h i ch s ta te havie g -continued many months, to the astonishment of all who knew ILe, I an; at a loss in what terms to express my gratitude, but beg you, for,the good of other suffering mortals, to make tbls my case as public as possible,. as. I shall on every occa• lion; in so doing you will greatly oblige, Sir, your grateful, obedient, very humble ant. sery ALEX. MUREER. Swan's Close. High-street, Edinburgh. Witnesses to the above Cure : John Tbniapson, No. 3, New Poultry Market, Edinburgh, John AP!_ittosh ' Old Assembly Close, Edinburgh. . Prepared and sold by the sole Proprietor, THOMAS TAY .LOR, Member of . the Royal College of Surgeons, at his konse, No. 9, New Bridge-street, London; whine, after a ennstant residence of more than 40 years, in a practice parti cularly directed to the cure of Venereal Complaints and those lucid en t a l to the Parts of Generation, with t hat inviolable secrecy which mep of his profession should always observe in glaelt cases, he flatters himself the advice anti assistance he atnitotasly administers to persons taking this Medicine, will ne esteuned, by a discerning Public , as an 4dr:a tag , seldom attainattle, and veid.of alt a mbiguity. Also sold, by his appoi utissent, for the eonvenience of these ng at a distance, at the Toyshop, No. 103. Oxford-street ; Disborougli!s. No. 7, Fish-street-hill ; Mr. Baxter, •South-bridge, • Edinburgh ; Mr. Callwel.'s, Du blin ; and of 'lle person in every considerable town. in Great Britain and Ireland, in boxes is (only is. yd. each, stamped, and sealed up W ith full and. plain diiections, whereby p ersons, of either ;ex may cute themselves with ease, speed, secrecy ; and safety. ASTATEMENT - of the AFFLICTING CASE of the THREE DAUGHTERS of the late Rev. JOHN RAUWORTH. The father of these unfortunate young women was Vicar of the very small living of Guilden Morden, in Cambridgeshire; he died in 1809, leaving 7001. in the 3 per cents. to each of his , children. His family consisted of three sons and five daugh ters ; 2001. was paid to the succeeding Vicar for dilapidations, and nearly 1001. was unfortunately. sacrificed its a legal process respecting the same. The expences of the education of the youngest son at ,chool, and at St. John's and Sidney Colleges, greatly exceeded the sum left him by his father; and in con sequence of injudious management, scarcely one penny of all the money originally bequeathed at this time remains. The eldest son was an attorney, and died some years ago ; the second son (who was an idiot) died last year; the eldest daughter was married, but is since dead, leaving nine chil dren. The youngest is married, and is with her child receiv ing parish relief from Steeple Morden. The youngest son was ordained last Midsummer, and had for three months the Curacy of Harlton, in Cambridgeshire ; from suffering absolute penury a year ago, through no mis conduct on Ins own part, and from his great subsequent exer tions in the pulpit, his health became impaired ; and on Sun day, Feb. 1, after performing double duty in the church of Barrow in Suffolk, he retired unwell to -the Rector's house, where he expired the same evening. . . . The three other children (who are the objects of this Sub scription, and two of whom are deficient in intellect) were re moved by an order of magistrates in a state of pauperism to the parish of' Guilden Morden twelve months back : and had not the Clerical Society in Cambridge granted them 301. last year, they would still be chargeable to the parish of which their re spected father was vicar. NVhatever sum of money may be collected through the bene volence of the public, will be vested in the hands of Trustees for the sole benefit of the Bliss Rauworths. Subscriptions will be thankfully received at the Banks of Messrs. Mortlocks and Fishers; and at Messrs. Deightons', in Cambridge. March, 1324. TRUSTEES. The Master of Jesus College. Rev. Edward Hibgame, Fellow of Jesus College. Rev. Thomas Sewell, Dalham, Newmarket. Sidney College £ s. The Master - - 5 Rev. F. Henson - 1 1 Rev. J. Hind - 1 0 Rev. %V. Garnons - 1 0 Rev. R. Jefferson 1 1 s. Rev. W. Mandell - 1 1 G. W. - - 1 1 Caius College. Master and Fellows - 5 0 Rev. T. Turnbull 1 1 Rev. C. Porter - 1 1 Rev. B. Chapman 1 1 ROC J. Day - 2 2 Clare Hall. St. John's College. The Master - - 2 2 Rey. R. Tatham - 2 2 Rev. T. Hornbuckle 2 2 Rev. T. Catton - 1 1 Rev. R. Jeffreys - 1 1 Rev. R. Carrighan - 1 1 Rey. N. Fiott - 1 1 Rev. L. P. Baker - 1 0 Dr. Haviland - 2 2 T. T. - - 1 0 1 0 1 1 r 0 3 3 1 1 0 10 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The Master - 5 5 Rev. F. Lodington 1 1 Rev. H. Kirby - 1 1 J. Power, Esq. ... 1 1 Magdalene College. The Master - 2 2 E. N. -10 s. 6d. Rev. R. Crawley - £2 2 'Mr. Husband -10 s. 6d. Pembroke Hall. The Master - - • 2 2 The College - - 3 3 Rev. H. Tasker - 1 1 Trinity Hall. Rey. J. C. Ebden 1 1 0: W. H. - - 5 0 • Corpus Christi College. Master and Fellows 5 5 Downing College. The Master - 2 2 • Rev. F. Robinson - R. - - A few Undergraduates 'B. Lambert, Esq. - R. T. B. . - W. D. Ryland - H. York; Esq. - T. Watson, Esq. - Rev. R. Twopenny Rev. R. Gwatkin Rev. H. Law Rev. R. Duffield - Trinity College. The Master - Rev. Jos. Romilly - IV. Whewell, Esq. - H. Meredyth, Esq. - Rev. Prof. Sedgwick J. C. Hare, Esq. Rev. R. W. Evans - Rev. G. Peacock Rev. Prof. Musgrave Rev. Prof. Dobree - Rev. G. D. Browne H. P. Hamilton, Esq. A. - - 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 2 2 - 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 - 0 5 1 - 0 10 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 - - U 5 Jesus College. The Master - 2 2 Rev. T. Dickes - 1 1 Rev. E. Hibgame - 2 2 Rev. J. Studhoim - 1 1 Rev. .1. Warren - 1 1 Rev. 0. Skinner . 1 1 Rev. T. Cautley - 1 1 E. S. - 1 '0 W. Hustler, Esq. 1 1 The College - 5 5 Rev. W. Sheepshanks 1 1 Rev. T. Clarkson 1 1 Bishop of Ely - - 10 0 Bishop of Durham 10 0 Rev. E. Addison, _ _ Landbeach - 1 1 W. Mortlock, Esq. 2 0 T. 31ortlock, Esq. 1 1 Rev. G. B. Pollen 1 Mrs. A. Pearce - 1 1 - 0 5 Sir Jas. Aflieck, Bart. 0 5 Miss Aleck - _1 _ 1 Hiss Paul - lOs 6d. sr. Anderson, Esq. Lt 0 S. Marriott, Esq. A. Gentleman - T. Thorp, Esq. R. Beverley, Esq. - Rev. J. P. Higman - Hon. G. Ryder S. Smyth, Esq. T. K. Arnold Esq. - E. Ware, Esq. R. H. Mrs. A. Gee - a - 1 1 31r. J. Gee , - 1 0 A. X. B. - 1 1 Miss S. Hodson - 1 1 Miss C. Hodson - 1 1 Mrs. Peru, Abington 1 1 Mrs. Ball, do. - 2 2 Rev. G. Barlow, do. 1 0 rs. Holt do. 2 2 Rev. E. Fisher, Linton 1 1 T. Fisher, sen. Esq. 1 1 T. H. Fisher, Esq. 1 1 G. Fisher, Esq. - 1 1 Mrs. Thackcray - 1 1 R. G. Townley, Esq. 1 1 W:W. Hayward. Esq. 1 1 Rev. It. Fiske, Fulbourn 1 1 N. N. - - - 1 0 Rey. G. Barnes, Norf. 2 2 Rev. T. D. .Atkinson, _ _ Thetford Mr. D. Sewell, do. 1 0 Mr. Williamson, Bal dock - - 5 0 Capt. Mortlock - 1 1 J. Heatlicote, Esq. 5 0 C. Raikes, Esq. Ilinx ton - . 1 1 Mrs. Raikes - Mr. Simpson, sen. 1 0 Mr. Adams - - 1 0 Mr. Simpson, jun. 0 10 Mrs. E. Sewster 1 0 T. Hall, Esq. Weston Colville - 3 3 Mr. Sherwin -10 s. 6d. Mr. Clabbon 10s. 6d. Rev. A. Cotton, Girton J.:2 2 A Lady 1 0 Mr. Newby, bookseller 1 0 J. Okes, Esq. I 1 E. H. - -10 s. 6d. Mrs. Roberts 1 1 C. Pemberton, Esq. 2 2 T. Fiske, Esq. 1 1 A Lady - 1 0 Mrs. S. Apthorp . 2 0 Mrs. Wheelwright 1 0 J. G. - 1 0 R. Gee, Esq. - 1 1 K. S. - - 0 10 Mr. T. Wilson 1 1 Mr. and Mrs. Hindley, Baldock . 5 0 Rev. R. Fiske, jun. 1 1 J. E. - -10 s. 6d. D. O. - - £1 1 Mrs. Hand, Chevelsy 2 2 W. Bryant, Esq. New market - 1 1 C. Hammond, Esq. do. 1 1 Hon. Miss Grimston 1 0 Hon. Miss C. Grimston 1 0 Mr. Talabert . 1 0 Rev. J. Hicks, IVilbra- ham - 2 0 Mr. Truslove . 1 0 Miss Spilsbury 1 1 T. Cocksedge, Esq. _ _ Bury 1 0 Rev. Sproule, do. 10s. 6d. W. Rayner, Esq. Strad dishall - £1 0 H. Cooper, Esq. bar rister 1 T. Mills, Esq. Saxham Hall - 5 5 Rev. W. White, Che vington - 2 0 Mrs. White - 1 0 Three MiSs Whites 3 0 Bev. T. Hund, Ousden 2 2 King's College, The Provost 2 2 Rev. S. B. Vince - 1 1 A. B. - -10 s. 6(1. B. Shephard, Esq. a 2 Rev. H. Chohneley, 1 1 Rev. J. Tomkms - 1 1 Thackeray, Esq. 1 1 Rev. C. Simeon - 1 1 Emmanuel College. Rev. T. Weller . • 1 1 Rev. W. Young 1 I P. Blakiston, Esq, 1 0 Rev. H. E. Holland 1 0 1 1 Rev. G. Arehdall 1 1 Rev. J. Griffith - 1 1 Rev- B. Michell - 1 1 Catherine Hall. The Master . 2 2 The College . 3 3 Rev. C. Burrell - 1 1 Rev. T. Chevallier 1 1 Rev. G. Corrie . 1 0 T. P. U. - - 0 10 Professor Turton 1 1 Christ's College. Bishop of Bristol 2 2 Rev. B. Gilpin - 1 1 Rev../. Graham 1 1 Rev..T. Croft - 1 1 Lord D. Stuart . 2 2 Rev. E. Mortlock 2 2 H. Gunning, Esq. 1 0 Peter House. The Master - 2 2 The College - 3 3 W. Smyth, Esq. 1 1 Rev. C. Smith - 2 2 Rev. A. Veasey 1 0 Thomas Pearne, Esq. 010 Queen's College. The President - 2 2 Earl of Hardwicke 10 0 E. G. Wood - 1 1 Esq. 1 1 G. Milner, Esq. COM.. berton - 1 1 Rev. S. Allen, Lynn 1 1 Rev. W. Clark, Has lingfield - - 1 1 W. J. Bankes, Esq. M.P. - 5 0 Rev. J. Baines, Burwell 1 1 J. Purchas, Esq. 1 0 Mr. and Mrs. Wicks 1 0 Mrs. Rayner - 1 1 Benjamin Keene, Esq. ' Westoe Lodge 2 2 A. B. C. Finch, Esq. - 1 Mrs. AVedd - 1 0 J. Vipan, - 5 0 Lady Duff Gordon 1 0 Mrs. Birch, Gazeley 1 0 Rev. W. Birch, do. 1 1 J. P. Cranmer, Esq. Quendon - 1 1 Mrs. Cranmer - 1 0 H; J. Adeane, Esq. 2 2 H. Revell, Esq. - 1 .1 111. G. - 1 1 X. - 1 1 D. F. - - 1 0 A Gownsman - 0 10 Deighton, book seller - - 1 1 W. K. F. - 1 0 A Gownsman - 1 0 D. X: - - 5 0 31r8. Beckford, tiham Hall 1 1 Rev. Dr. Chatfield I 1 Rev: Mr. Hatchard 0 10 A. B. 2 0 Miss Sheepshanks 1 I Miss L. - Sheepshanks 1 1 Rev. T. Howes, 31orn ingthorp, NOrfolk 1 1 Hon. Miss Henniker 2 2 Mrs. A. Wilson 0 10 Her. T. Haggitt, Bury 1 1 Rev. F. Barnwell, do. 1 1 Rev. H. Hasted, do. 3 3 Mrs. Haggitt, do. 1 0 Mrs. Waddington, do. 2 2 J. Le (trice,Esq. do. 1 1 Rev. J. Standly, do. 1 1 Rev. 0. Rays Tostock 1 I J. Oakes, Esq. do. 1 1 H. Oakes, Esq. do. I 1 T. Holmes, Esq. do. 1 1 M. S. - £1 0 T. Steel, Esq. Bury 1 0 liev. K. W. Carter, Chedburgh - 1 0 Key. G. H. Greenall, Moulton - 1 1 -- Piper, Esq. New market - 1 1 Hedger, Esq. 2 2 Rev. _ Church, _ _ Cheveley ._- 1 1 Rey. T. I sa acson, Lid gate - 1 1. Mr. Murray, Dalham 1 0 Parish of Harken, Cambridge- shire. Rev. G. Palmer, Rector 3 3 Mr. Whitechurch 0 6 Mrs. Whitechurch 0 5 Mr. Whitechurch, jun. 0 1 NIL Brand, sen. Is. 6d. Mr. Brand, jun,. ss. Od. Mr. Fresh b Is. Od. Mrs. Eversden Is. Od. Mrs. S. Brand - Is. 6d. Mr. T. Brand . ss. Od. Leete Od. Parish of Barrow, Suffolk. Mr. Lyns - £1 1 Miss Lyns - 1 1 Mr. S. Shillito - 1 0 Mr. T. Shillito - 010 Mr. Neave, surgeon 1 0 Mr. Cornell - 1 0 Mr. Crown . 0 5 Mr. Clarke - 2s. 6d. Mr. Deesley - 2s. Gd. Mr. Pask . 3s. Gd. Mr. Hempstead 4s. Od. Miss Offord - 3s. Od. Mr. Freeman - 4s. Od. Miss Mainwaring 10s. Od. 1 1 HIEROGLYPHICS; or, the IRISH PRE. CEPTOR. Resorting in teaching to curious specifics, An Irish Preceptor thus us'd hieroglyphics : " In Dublin you're been, and on Curragh of Kildare, Young Shaughnessy, rank and high fashion when there; Now, what was the prevalent charm as.each place, That gave to attraction superlative grace?— Examine these pictures, and ample suggesti You'll find how correctly to answer the question." The First represented, in desperate strife, Fierce combatants struggling for victory and The second a double yew-tree on the wing, Near which seem'd'sonte small feather'd minstrels to The Third a chatAird, whose tongue seldom is still, With scroll, French conjunction that bore, in its The fourth was an insect, industry not scant in ; The Last a gilt frame, but the picture was wanting. " This painting that spreads (desolation afar, Young ShaughneSsy said, " surely represents WAR. The small blebs are wrens, but the double-yew reft, Four-fifths, that is R, E, N, S, is then left ; • These pictures uniting to form thus a name Proclaim'd o'er the world by the clarion .of Fame! And J is.the name of this chatter-bred bird, E, T, on the scroll, the conjunctive French word ; And this hieroglyyhic so aptly is set, That none can mistake in pronouncing it JET.— Next serves the name of an insect to show; , • And since to this frame no instruction we owe,. Its principal ornament plainlis LACKING,. And thuS isillustrated , WAIIEEN'S JET BLACKING! This Easy Shininz and BLACKING, prepared by RODER:I' WARREN, . . • . so,-sTRAND,• LONDON; - Atulsolii in every Town in the Kingdom. LIQUID, in Bottles, 6d, Ind. Mi. and lad. each. Also PASTE BLACKING, in Pots Gil. led. and lad. each. A Shilling Pot of Paste is equal to Four Is. Bottles of Liquid. ASK FOR - AVARREN'S BLACKING. FIRE AT CAIRO. (From the Allgem t i ne LEGHORN, MAY , 5 . --Letters from Cairo give an account of tne fire Zeitu ng of May 16 .) which broke out in that city on the 21st of Mar c h, a t t wo o'clock in the a ft e rnoon, in the old c i tadel in the barrac k wad joining the arsenal wh ere cartr id ges are ma de.— lhpeia flam es spreadestoa; ds the ra powder magazine. At half-past three, some ch ests o f pow d er bl ew up ; pidly in various directions, es i at five there was a terribl e exp l os i on , w hi c h l a id all the surrounding buildings in ruins ; and just ec a as it struck ten at night, a third explosion spread the desolation further. On the following morn ing the fire seemed to abate, when consternation was spread on its being known that the great ma r gazine, containing 25,000 canters of powder, was in danger, and the entire destruction of Cairo was apprehended. The undaunted efforts of the troops, however, succeeded in checking, and at length subduing the flames. At the very begin ning of the conflagration, the people fled in countless multitudes out of the city, one bad consequence of which was, that it baffled all the measures of precaution that have been adopted. From the homely Gate eastwards to the Old Citadel, nothing is to be seen but remnants of walls, shattered beams, waggons, and gun car riages. Out of the new gate the ruins begin at the - distance of 50 paces, and over a vast space there are seen among the ruins 4,000 burnt or lacerated horses, mules, and camels. A fine park of artillery which stood in Joseph's Hall, and in the Amphitheatre at the west end of the city, is destroyed, except twenty-six pieces. The whole arsenal, too, is annihilated, except a magazine of tools, some chests of muskets, and the machine for boring cannon. Of the little park of field ar tillery which stood in the homely-square, only fifteen six-poUnders are saved. The new citadel, in which are the Mint, the Hall for the Divan, and several Government offi ces , suffered but little. The two powder.mag azines, in two towers, surrounded with ditches, were untouched. It is calculated that fifty millions of Turkish piastres will not suffice `to replaCe the citadel and the arsenal in their former state. The let= tern do not contain even a conjecture respecting the origin of the fire. HOW T O PRESERTE MILR.—Th e following re ceipt to preserve milk is given in a new weekly Journal called Ilugie, or Journal de ,S'ante et d'Economk Donzestique :—Put to a pan of milk a spoonful of wild horse-radish, and it will re main sw ee t f or severa l d a ys, e i t h er i n t h e o p e n air or in c e ll ar , w hile other m ilk w ill change.' PARLIAMENT, HOUSE O,F LORDS, MAy 24. SECRET SOCIETY ACT (IRELAND). The Earl of KINGSTON presented several petitions from certain Freemasons of Ireland, praying that they : may be ex empted from the speration of the Se cre t Society Act.—They were all laid on the table. MESSAGE FROM THE COMMONS. Mr. S. Wortley, and others, from the Commons, brought up several private Bills, which were read a first time. EAST INDIA COMPANY'S ACCOUNTS. Mr. Mason, from the India House, 'presented the Annual Ac count of the Revenue of the East India Company. *ENDOWMENTS FOR EDUCATION IN IRELAND. The Earl of KINGSTON moved for Copies of all Returns relative to the Endowments for the Encouragement of Educa tion in Ireland— . -Ordered. Lord CARBERRY made a few observations on this notice, which were nearly inaudible below the bar: it was understood the Noble Lord objected to the present mode of appointing dio cesan schoolmasters, and to suggest ,the propriety of suspend ing the powers of the Board of Education, during the inquiry of the Committee appointed by their Lordships, relative to educa tion in Ireland. The Earl of LIVERPOOL hoped that the Noble Lord would not make a motion,in conformity with his suggestion, without giving previous notice of his intention to do so., • - - RESTORATION OF FORFEITED PEERAGES. The Earl of LIVERPOOL rose to lay on their Lordships' table several Bills for the restoration of honours to families which had been attainted. In doing this it would only be necessary for him to say a few •words upon the subject.— When his Majesty had been graciously pleased two years ago to visit Scotland, the first visit paid to that country by any So vereign of his Illustrious House, or since the Revolution it was natural that those individuals, whose 'ancestor s - had been at. tainted, who felt conscious that they had acted with unshaken loyalty for sixty years, should humbly petition his Majesty to restore those honours which their ancestors had lost. Neither did it appear inconsistent with his Majesty's dignity that he should have been disposed to lend a willing ear to those peti tions. Yet, befdre complying with their prayer, much consi deration was required, and it was only now that he was able to lay these Bills before the House. They formed an excep tion to the general course of Parliamentary . Acts, for they ori ginated with the Crown, and came down signed by the King. Tkey included four cases ; and it was not necessary that he should show what circumstances had induced his Majesty to consent to the restoration of forfeited honours. To read the names would be sufficient to satisfy their Lordships that there was no disposition to act under the influence of any narrow principle. It was material, however, that he should say that those four cases rested entirely on grace and faVotir on the part of his Majesty ; for no consideration should ever induce him to bring into question the propriety and justice of the original proceedings against the attainted families. They were there fore acts of Royal grace and favour, springing from the kind disposition of the Sovereign on the throne, and granted to in. dividuals whose conduct and loyalty for many rears had at tracted his Majesty's notice, to the restoration of their family honours. So much for that part of the subject. He should not look at those acts of grace and favour with so much satisfac. tion if they were not accompanied by what he called an act of justice. He should therefore have to add to the Bills which he had mentioned, a Bill also signed by his Majesty for reversing the attainder of Lord Stafford—( Hear, hear !)--which all par ties mast look upon as a great blot upon our history. It was gratifying to bins to be the instrument to perform that act of justice, in combination with acts of grace and favour, to a most respectable family, and to (10 away one of the greatest stigmas that ever fell on the conduct of Parliament in one of the worst periods of our history. The Noble Earl then concluded by proposing the first reading of the following Bills : For restoring John Francis Erskine, Esq. to the Earldom of Mar. For the restoration of John Gordon, Esq. to the Earldom of Kenmore. For the restoration of James Drummond, Eiq. to the Earl dom of Strathallan and Perth. • . Earl RADNOR wished to know whit was the nature of that Bill ? The Earl of LIVERPOOL had no objection that it should be read, if it would be any sataaction to the Noble Earl. The Bill having been read by the Clerk of the Honse, The Earl of LAUDERDALE objected to passing a Bill to reverse an attainder without first solving all doubts as to the question whether the person in whose' favour the attainder was to be reversed, was the real Lord Strathallan. Before the Bill proceeded through its stages, it would be necessary to have the opinion of the Judges on the subject. Earl RADNOR conceived it regular when a Bill to reverse an attainder was introduced, that the documentS on which the attainder was founded should be first produced. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, that it was a point agreed upon that such Bills could only orioinate with the Crown. And when an Act of Grace of that kind came down with the signa ture of his Majesty, would their Lordships refuse to give it a first reading, which was given by courtesy to all other Bills ever submitted to the House ? Earl ItADNOR wished to know whether there were pre cedents ? _ _ - The LORD CHANCELLOR said that it was not neces sary to produce documents' when a Bill recited an old Act of Parliament. - - Lord HOLLAND conceived that the course followed by the Noble Earl (Liverpool) was the proper one, and that it was usual to allow a Bill to be read a first time without coming to the question. With respect to himself he was willing to give such Bills as the present all due encouragement. He supposed the Noble Earl had looked for precedent, and that care would be taken to provide against questions of law which might arise. The Earl of LAUDERDALE did not oppose the first reading of the Bill, he only stated the objectiops which he entertained to it, and which he should bring forward another time. Viscount MELVILLE said, that if the Noble Earl (Radnor) would look at the pro ceedings of th e H ouse on th e case o f t h e Earl of Dorchester, he would find in them a precedent for the course now proposed. After a few words from Lord BELHAVEN, the Bills were read a first time. The Earl of LIVERPOOL then moved the first reading of a Bill to restore William Nairn, Esq, to the title of Lord Nairn. Earl RADNOR moved that the Bill be printed. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said that the Noble Earl might have the Bill read, printed, or whatever he pleased. But whilst it was a matter of courtesy to give a first reading with out any opposition to the most trifling Bill, was 'he to be blade an exception to that general rule on this most sacred oc casion, and when he had brought down a measure, signed by his Majesty ? The Bill having been also read a first time, The Earl of LIVERPOOL then moved the first reading of a Bill worded in a different manner, as the circumstances were not the same—to reverse the attainder of William Lord Vis count Stafford.—Read a first time. PETITIONS. The Earl of SHAFTESBURY presented a petition from the Protestant Union in London and its vicinity, against the English Catholics 'Bills.—Laid on the table. • The Bishop of ST. DAVID'S presented similar petitions from the Clergy of Brecknockshire, and from the Archdeacon ries of Cardigan, Carmarthen, and St. David's.—Laid on the table. ENGLISH CATHOLICS. The Ordet of the Day having been read; The Marquis of LANSDOWN rose pursuant .to his notice, t o move the second reading of two Bills for the very partial relief of his Majesty's Roman Catholic* subjects in this coun try. It was e x p a l e f i a n v , o u t r h a a b t l e e n o m th e n e t v o e r t y h e n m i g e i a l u t e r n e whichs whic h he ee had =uettltoown for that purpose, he and their Lordships had had the satisfactio n of se e i ng the Crown proceeding from its own, motion, to reverse an act of injustice towards a most respect able Roman Catholic family. An act of injustice committed byTtirliament, but committed in times of violence, of which he wished every trace and every recollectiOn to be obliterated. He should not think it necessary to address any argument.t the understanding' of those, who from indulging feelings _„ dis like and hostility inherent to vulgar minds, might be of to refuse the concessions called fot, not because it was persons to grant 'them, but because they were to be wade to p who held religious opinions differ e nt f r om their ow n• should address no argument. But he should contend To such ntend for the principle that in this country every individual was equally entitled to the enjoynient of every political privilege not in , consistent with the safety of State. And he would shew that those which lie.was now claiming for the English Catholic were perfectly reconcileable with the safety of the State. The .common object of the two bills before the House was to place as nearly as might be, the Roman Catholics of the whole'courr , try on the same footing as they were now in a great portion of the United Kingdom, with a few exceptions, proceeding from the fact that there were offices here which had no parallel in Ireland. After stating the object of the Bills, he should have expected that when all parties, both in and out of doOrs, were agreed as to the propriety of legislating to put all parts of the United Kingdom in the same political condition,- there would have been but one opinion as to the importance of in., troducing uniformity, but particularly religious uniformity— Though he did not mean to contend that anomalies in - the Constitution might not sometimes be attended with beneficial effects. In this case, however, the anomaly was injurious instead of beneficial, and every reason was in favour of 'its being abolished. He should now enter into the details of the Bills, and ask their Lordships whether the English Roman Ca. tholics were not entitled to the relief proposed for them. The object of the first Bill was to grant to English Catholics the benefit of the elective franchise. Their Lordships were aware that it had been conceded twenty years ago to the Irish Ca tholics, and it would no doubt be urged that it had contri buted to an undue extension of population in Ireland, and had proved detrimental to that country. But it was not from the grant of the elective franchise that those evils had arisen, but from the subdivision of property. The same argument could not be applied to the Catholics here, who were quite is a different situation. The qualification of property belonged to Roman Catholics in this country, and yet we were exposed to the anomaly of seeing Catholic Land proprietors coming forward to propose candidates for the representa tions of towns and counties, and afterwards obliged to re tire without giving them a vote. Nay, he understood that in some instances Catholics had proposed Candidates who were opposed to their claims. Was it just, he would ask their Lordships, to the English Catholics, that an Irish peasant should be received on those hustings, from whence a Sir William Throgmorton or a Sir Thomas Gage would be obliged to retire without giving a vote . ?— He thought he had now said enough to induce their Lordships to give this part of the subject a favourable consideration. If there was no danger in allowing Catholics to vote in bodies at elections, there could be none in granting that privilege when their numbers were small.. With respect to the other Bill for enabling Catholics to hold certain offices in the Revenue and Customs, he conceived that if Catholics were eligible to such situations on one side of the Channel, they ought to be so on the other. There was also a strange anomaly introduced into the existing law by therecent consolidation of the Revenue and Customs,Boards of the two countries. It was well known that Catholics could in Ireland fill the office he alluded to, and by a recent regulation those persons might be brought forth in this country to fill similar situations here, while English Catho- , lies were excluded. Our present system was, therefore, not only inconsistent in principle, but inconvenient in practice. In short, the Noble and Learned Lord on the 'Woolsack was bound to bring in a Bill of Pains and Penalties against his Col leagues, for they had virtually repealed one of the Acts of Charles IL, which obliged all officers in the Excise and Cus• toms to take the oath of Supremacy. Upon the next point em braced in this Bill, he was at a loss to know what objection there could be to relieve Roman Catholics from oaths on as suming the office of Justices of Peace in this tranquil and peaceable country, which they were exempt from in a country subject to rebellions and outrage.: Many days had not passed since, in the Committee of which he was a Member to en quire into the state of parts of Ireland, an opportunity was presented him of putting a question bearing on this topic. Ile asked a witness, who was an Inspector of Police, : if he knew any instances in which Catholic constables or police men were influenced by religious motives to depart from their duty ? The answer was, not a single, instance ; and nearly the same reply was made respecting Catholic Magis trates. Another officer, however, was included in the present Bill, to which no parallel could be found in Ireland. • He meant that of Earl Marshal, held by his Grace the Duke of Norfolk, among many other honours inherited from his illus• trious ancestors. Now he (the Marquis of Lansdown) under stood, that at the period of the ceremonial of the Coronation, the highest law authority had declared the incompetency of the Duke of Norfolk to officiate as Earl Marshal, without subju• gating himself to the penalties of a misdemeanour. The Noble Duke, however, he (Marquis of Lansdown) was bound to say declined the restoration of the privilege attached to his house, unless it was accompanied at least by a partial relief to.his Roman Catholic countrymen. Having gone through the prin cipal points included in the Bills before their Lordships, he would conclude by merely asking if they could really say dan ger was to be apprehended from the measures he had the ho nour to propose ? Let them recollect, too, the lesson which the decision of that night would give to s ix milli o n s o f R o m an Catholics in Ireland. If the Bills were adopted, it would teach them that patience and merit met with a suitable reward—but if the rejected, that numbers and influence might have more weight. The Noble Lord sat down by moving the second-read ing of the Bills. Lord COLCHESTER objected to the present Bills, because he found that instead of giving relief to the Catholics by a general measure, it was now the object to proceed step by step in an ascending scale. In the other-House of Parliament he had expreseed his willingness to open to Catholics all situa tions of profit or emolument, but not those conferring civil rights. He still held the same opinion. With regard -to the office of Earl Marshal, he thought that relief should be obtain ;edby a separate Bill. Admitting Catholics to be Justices of the Peace was admitting them to judicial situations, and there ! fore he would oppose it.. As to .the other offices in the Re venue, &c. whatever opinion might be held, he could not : help saying that the Bill for extending the elective franchise i had his most unqualified disapprobation.. It would introduce • religious animosity into election contests, and give Catholics of wealth and ambition an opportunity of buying up lands and making freeholders. If uniformity between England and Ire land was the object, it could only be obtained by destroying the e on - o t ilic se r e elief bad undergone change. uniformity between England and Scotland. The Noble Lord then alluded to the conduct of some Catholic Bishops in 1808 and 1813, and a letter from Dr. Doyle,- recently published, whiCh appeared to him to be characterized by seditious inso lence, and concluded by moving as an amendment, " That the Bills before the House be,read that day six months." Earl WESTMORLAND was every day more and more sa tisfied of the impolicy of granting Catholics, the general relief which they sought, but still gave his support to these Bills.— The Elective Franchise was extended to Catholics in Ireland, and if possessed by them here could do no harm, when at the utmost only 500 or 1,000 individuals might avail themselves of the privilege. The Noble Earl then contended, that as Parlia ment had sanctioned Catholic Officers in the Army and Navy, they should do the same with Officers in Civil employments.— As a means of resisting the further claims of the Catholics, he would give them the indulgences demanded in the present mea sures, which, though a favour to few, would be a consolation to many. In the House of Comm r w i Billstl es that everyig ince merit n Ireland did thereforewron wrong r once,t cheel:oEspshot: wrongittlihitaceirinnrt ba e n l n e d t r e these. u9.r measures, Lord REDESDALE considered the great . ob . je . cti o o Tiu n ft t eip o oa t oo h rffini e si s a: e_ flea power would bestow an influence over the concerns of the c Catholics in lrelandl e ethlte Hweeoll.rue:errre,abedduy.; Established Church, he could not s upport suck a demand. It f was said that because Catholics obtained the elective franchise ognhst concession h6ef had p votedp led et y t o f boyr the further ioci removalnce b s concessions. ad s s s ap " s to es ;l i f e On. these of Earl Marshal,c Church t t rcal poiver, and he sli .office easures, if po h s a se t s t s h io e n ca o th f o th li e priv'l • groundsi3hisehocpouolfd consent to something to th e e po n liii e ca l l nd p n- D.-next addressed h q ue seat e n t. ie t a y d tqw l h i v a oeeu v tsl e i:ti le o ad ,n o d It was now country. Ca tholics in that catorri carried, seize The we re,,ret wa s for the to say most part inaudible 14low- the 'We understood-him to say, that his • Bar. sentiments, on the Aseat m either mouse of rarliament wold U give the power of su bverting the Established Church, and a desire to do siOvas:na. tural in Roman Catholics generally. itthe we ll known t elective franchise, while it enabled a Catholic to express his political, opinions through a Protestant representative, did not allow his religious motives to operate. The . Bills under consideration would remove full an anamoly and inconsistency in the existing law, and would enable the Protestant to say to his Catholic fellow-subject that he was in ever, his • • respect friend, compatible with th.frafety of established political Institutions. ; r• - The Bishop of BATH and WELLS thought t h e only, ques. she! she) arter drter she! 45 S I 7 3 Od hull Ss ea OS Oa 6 9 4d Os Oj eguaf ?ma, is in :ham ne- ion in ire in , fficta a 52 4 a 48' a 48' a 40' a SR , a yes a 311 si Oa —s Od 7s Od Od 183 Od 181 0 d _sod Grain were econd Oats, later a ---.' 9 39 5 a qt3s a ---3 a --"g with nd and iarter -6 Od -s Od -s'Od 93 Od 6:401 ether ne 0 ;7 5 14' 40 4 .1 8 c 40 5 IS' 1.3 40 A 60' B a r- Hog oat 3s; 6 , 4 HO , per heat Od of on 6 011 . Oa lops inch ood li O. I 0 ri.o ;rx•