The Sun. — London, England, 1820-06-28 00:00:00

ief.- 11 dui eel by zm to to be tltt ed as disqttalified front voting when the eines -00 came before the House, he maintaineel, was If winch. ought not to be thought of ; ants 111, t 1 Resol ut i on were adopted of that kind, Jie "'gilt it would be quite as well that they lite t itic u t - i ' ot r i esolve right or wrong never in future to any secret inquiry at all, Ile thought t° 'Poke impartially, when he said he was ‘villing i j st il v li i "e t. of , all necessary delay to enable her Ma he tie • 0 ' b r ing forward any witnesses that might eesaary for her defence when' the charges re't r t e ; kll but he could see no reason for ad ot delay before the commencement of the A ir e e j editt . gs. He might • say,-in , the langua t ge ha o t t . It e "'lce Chamberlain, that a covenan t I t halle between God and himself, that nor 1 1 1 ; ere31 "--no r patty—nor any o ther inducement, all e ° 1 41(1 be suffered to prrss on him the eette al of a departure from justice." . To the best t .. "nderQuiliding he w ould do his duly, and e; . : n 'Y abide by ri le sober judgment which the ) might c o me to on t h e subjecl, and if be ti...11"1 uni ntentionally fall in o error, he hoped Goud would torgive hint. Ti 'e M arqoess o f Latesnowte called upon the : d t 'se to eensider it -the cour s e now recommend -1514116"n was. that -which was best cilenhtted to ii-,-" t er the ends of-justice. The Noble Earl op te had been too mans y i n what he had said to tt„i ' t attempt t o l ea d them into a inisc4 h e ot tucep ilel,with tespect to the contents of the 'ad not s.at et thing to lead them to ib any t what h e ( t h e M arqoess o f Lausdown) be ite"eed to be t h e f act, t h at t h ere was ot h er strayer 11Set'ing forth crimes, misconduct, or ellega: (k " t ti not i • v connected with the par.ll - sPeci any wa esof od . ' ,Atce which had been most o. e,,, l ti n . e hly allud e d t o . L o oking et the 1 o (1 a ti:, l ni g'. of th e atilt! . House so tar as he 11 ~ ti 10 do, he maintained that up to he pe ti,':;_`vlten the [louse of Cotnnions should 11eter :t whether any Indicial proceedings . rit le, r l ;' ) . l lh t a k e p l ace, t h at t h ey oug h t not b y any 1 1 , 44 ' 4 4 1 ineeiri es o f t h eir own , to d o th at whi c h 11 14 1 t il , qualify them to act as itdees in this in to . 4 " Case, it they should he called upon to d o Wi t! T '''act su c h a part wou ld not ' be consistent 10 1 , 1 1 t he pi . iticiOlts it hick had always governed, le v iierii e i Irt Lordships' I,igli s j con donet ,t t toghe (- be t) the coun tr y. A S ecre t C om mittee of th a t 14,1nLse wite.trot necessary to introthice a Bill of 6, 4 ; 4 and Peotalties,. Rod one ex-parte . ioviry on t 4.4 s " 1 ) je e t h ad taken place already. It the fact h et 3 " PI I au ieTtiry having been set on toot we_re it mus t have been approved by 01,-r:titers. The Commissi , tn he woald not con iegsni; it migh t b e . nece s sar y ; b u t. understand -1 e 'eh an iequiry to have been set on foot tan ant eaidence against her, it might 1 , 4 - 've ' , l ..?' h e expeeted, that the illustrious personage st 'V. " Let use have no me-re Secret Coin more ax-parts fr.fe defied to prove that there was. any rule in chil,": l nity with %%hien the Secret Commi.tee te as h a l l I 'lr • lie hail then a tight to argue on he ft,nt th e Q ueen, t h at she-ought to be relieved li tl k it . since the betiefi , . intended her by it site tae: t her Coonsel disclaimed. The Comutittee tt ) , 1 41 ouly i nte r pose anot h er d e l ay in addition tar se which had ale - early occurred, tut' WM( 11gine- - tinpitratit business by a sreefie step: yel.teti"ernment, atter having tr boort them t er) -- ' were undetermined whether they would to e - e ne public accusers or !tot,- how was it ; el LPecteri t h at a C omm i ttee cool decide Th e fir tet e weeks ? 'flue Noble , Earl bad for ace t4e t ti me avowed hi mse lf t o S te a p u bli c iestytsr ei t ba t night, hut some of his Ma-, br) t h ''' lol sler s. h a d d ec l are d th a t t h e y w ou ld nerved fehli c accusers ; an d w h ets h e ob i\lolil h e`e thi ngs ., cou ld h e ex p ect t h at, t h e h 't who m i g h t f orm the Committee would ts Ni e 1 .. ° Come t o a more d ec i s i ve j u d gment t h an Ct,thit Government. He conceiei,d the a,: t t t i ee would prove wholly useless, and that liebe e 1 " make an injurious impression on the taciifi Ile would cheerfully make every t lre te le . e to procur e an accommodation of the teli u 4ces in the Royal Family, but compelled to t "iii,.. l4l , t bat hope, there was nothing to dcr but t elt i ° l ", e " , as it appeared to him. He, however, kit tee, " he his duty to oppose the Secret Com atol for himself - be should certainly decline I'lee orsit, / , )1 11- 4 , 1 Cli ANCELLOR., in explanation, de -1703,"e contse which the house bad pursued ti 4 "( 1 1720, with respect to Messages to-tit ecio°tuts`roln the Cr own, and po i nte d out the (Hs else ()flit:hat was to b e ta k en b etween t h e exer - L no g legislatorial arid judicial functions. to witli"ipoNt i unttmoee—As• h e did not p ro pose tetie ed t raw himself- from the Committee, but in tnate ~4 1 do his d itty •i u it, thought it right totet,itconrily his reasons for taking that cours e Mirk lie left i t hi s duty to prefer. Before be tl et . ed '.'l l Ills mind o e this subject, lie had coital' Iti oth en it t Well. The Goveritnrent bad lost not a try in se on the arrival of the Queen in this cootie The dowu a mes s age to Parliament.--th Ise did its duty b y proceeding to take tg , t e "hject of the Royal charge--a charge tere,teci the Royal feelings were more in ":111tIta" it email be in any, other. Ad -I,ehts had subsequently been proposed, a e "Pe that an amicable arrangement might ig,,rtrii°lllldislied, and to these lie had assented, fristerstlt ofistlect, the facts himself, and considering Mi- Ito,e, afterto be the best judges of the case. They Dra t , ' whet had passed, thought this the 1:1 re " "me for • • 'e.Y proceeding with the i'c't Proceeded +ebony on their own re kattet il y be did ti nt imp u t e this toohem as a k4l.- reltroach. lie wished Ministers would' 1.1441'11er take counsel from the Ho uses of Par ierertt. lit calling; fora Secret t wo Committee, he was ia 113 " 1 to think ihat had I ' cted with a ft.voris:octaittistieolin.in'l'ehyat House, lie contended, I oceedings.— tit,-ver''lneut undertook env O of . t bring ie a P . l grave l accit i s i a a; tt 4 .L'asiest a certain illustrio us liolividua —w I ,":ttl Y ( . l l : ) a _ d e ttl."4l.erlook they had discharged. They . n, te heir duty to the House and to the Pnb -I;„6lel,l,lt_etsiponsible srrvants of the Crown. The claliels,ii.e.n proceeded to deprecate, in strong . 1 1 , t tett tlr bus,i rip-se which bad _ been pur -1 illg c( ness 111 he House of Commons ttii:Lu., I consistent as their Lordships bad tl ?tlta be hoped tLey Would not suffer statics ? pro- littee; cis on en ad' dot! at e coil" e tarts in the refer, 4ertied I to ag 'lieges, and ~ take oselfl y werg itg be• npvear )ted (I not should 'ether, d con" to tlue Corn" bi for in ex• ti have it)g the . ties Coun liaa he 1(111 ard It Pert viol .der t° :tedini; wi►t' Ore for Rest , ' 004icit COllO n, And y• ll° StE~~~ Itl 111 0 duiro (f their eA ticx Queell ied tilt; Cool" point 4 beta ild n° it !mint ri incd he (-I bet ° o 11'0 cts Wipe , c o by Teel rnitY °l bile lid -Aso' ijest he 04° leg r ti!'° go, themselves to be led astray by the example afforded them in the proceedings Not the other Honse. He looked upon their conduct in'this instance, as the strangest that had ever been known of any well. regulated assembly, fle-conld not give in to the notion, that oily accused person could, putting their hands upon - their beau, declare that they did not expect a fair trial from that House; H.e could see tip course more Holmr to be adopted on the present occasion than the going into a Secret Committee. lie saw no ParliamentarY reason whatever against it ; And he was perfectly, satis fied, that, in.conducting,the affair in that manner, they vFould be acting according to the most. ho• nourable, as % , t;e11 as Parliantentary usage. Lord LAUDERDALE stated his regret at finding himself that night in .a situation of differing with many of his friends. He wished, (and God forbid any one should entertain a contrary sentiment) that no injustice should be done to the accused party in this case. But be wished to see justice done to another person—the person who had brought into that' House . the case at pret,ent before- them ; he meant the heatl of the aovern mem of this Country, who _considereti himself agoiered in the manner siN hid' had been hinted to them- He cer:ainly had never - conceived, be tore the law on this subject had been so ably pro !wooded to them by . the Noble. Lord on the AV.ool sack, that the sovereign had no other resource in inch a situation than to apply to. Parliament. — But if Parliat»eitt were to decide upon the merits. ot the case, all the knowledge he possessed of the Constitution of this country taught him to be lieve that Mmistets could not take upon tbem- Selves the responsibility of bricking in a Bill, without prrvions lamination. being laid on- the table of the House.—(Hear, hear, hear !)—Un der another view of the case, the Queen's having sent a petition to that House, he shoold like to irnow, giving all sloe credit for the talents - of the. legal advisers of her Majesty, how arty could possibly advise her to ask for tone to collect evidence for the refutation of charges of which they pro'e,sed to know nothing.—(Hear really saw no reason why this secret Committee . shouin tee considered FIT that of Ministers alone. Ile had acted on many Committees previously with Ministers, and 'from his expetieuce or them he could, state they had always acted on such occa sions with due Lonsideration, and quite different from what they did at other times. Lord LANSDOWN and Lunt LAUDERDALE mu- Lutd BeimAver; was anxious to state, that al though he should vote for the motion of the Noble Lord, he Whs . not against inquity, which he only desiren to set estalAished on broad principles of 13rHsik justice. In the present case the accused ihtiividnal had reason to object to a secret in viry, She knew that it was founded on the iteport of a certain Secret Commission, which had been appointed to sit on the subject ; and- which she was awate she had reason to dread. She knew no more of the details of this commission Report titan she knew of the reason for removing her mime trAm Li- orgy. Lord Bu LKELEY ~ contended, that the accused party 11: , (1 iu uufloubte4 right to an open tribunal, wuethri -0.6, - eu it as Mrs. Brunswick, or as hr (,),ievn of Euglatid —(A laugh.)'—This being Isis•view ol•tbc natter, tt tI'AS with the greatest pain that tie telt liimselt obliged to ititrer trout those for wi.om he test a great regard y but still he would (Wier wic It thtni on this point, it_it should be the last ,vord tie ever spoke in iris lite. Lord. HOLLAND rose, tit order to state his rea saes for voting in layout of the :nation before the House. The -Noble Lord entered into a detail of the preeedent• which referred to the comae adopt ed in the present case, coat, titling there Was none which autiontsed the proceeding by Secret Cont.. snittee in the first instance. He - was not vet y old, I►tit i n th e course of his Patliamentary he had had the great misfortune of seeing no less than seven Green Bags, involving 04 li berties of every individual in the Country; placed on the Table Of Illst House. He agreed wit!) a Noble Lord who had stated, that a Bill of Pains and Penelties could originate with that House. Since the Revolution, h o w e v er , t h i y had generally originated - with the other noose. The case ,which he was able to quote as most in point, was the - case of Lord Clarendon, Some meastoes were going on in the other House, librly to lead to an impeachment of that Noble Lord ; and a Bill was brought tip to that House, rending to the sante end, when a negociation was thought fit to be-set on foot. This negociation was on the part of the King, who wished .Lord Clarendon to leave England, in order to tranquil lize the country. Actuated - by feelings of con scious innocence, however, he r4d not like to comply wich the wish of his Royal Master. How ever, front feelings of respect .be eventually con sented to withdraw, and did so accordingly. Not 3 days after a Bill ot Pains and Penalties was brought against him for running away front justice; arid indeed, in most instances, if they looked at the cases of Bills-of Altainder, they would find that it was for mooing away from justice. Th e dis tinguishing feature of the present case however was, that the object of negociation was to force her Majesty to leave the country—to do what was termed, in Parliamentary language, flying - from justice; and iu the event of her Majesty's ,com pliance site was to be rewarded—rewarded for leaving the kingdom with that. wilier) was always intended to maintain her in proper state and dig nity ih it.--(Hear !)—With reference to the doc trine held with respect to the Illustrious Perstan 7 age, who was illustrious as well from her ances tors as 110111 her station, his opinion was; that she was as the first subject of the State, liable tO im peachment, it in her station she were so to abuse her power as to create a public evil. He hail the authority of Lord Somers,. at least, ft.ir this doc trine. Of all the precedents that had been-brought forward in the discussion of this tnatter, he eon• tended there was not one in favour of the present case; but that in those cases where • there was any analogy, it was all against the appointment of a Secret Committee. This Part of the proceed ing was not at all necessary, and was very grievous tO s tile party concerned. '['here Was a . strong con-, trast between the conduct of Ministers on the present occasion, and on that of a late question in some respect similar. He alluded to the case of the j u auc b c wr ,Nazistrutes ! .Wligp it wll3 to jrnpeaeo them, it wa3 Itrepuousiy cfied - out—that an inquiry would )e prejudging the case.—(Cheers, Heir, hear !)---\lotv, how ever,.they -different- refused -to liver) to the . conplainls made on all sides, of pre judging the, cause of the aci.used, in going into an inquiry on ex•parte evidence. He called on the House to think of the consequences which the taking this unnecessary step would have on the minds of the Country. - Hecould,,not bear to think of the appearance this would have to. the Country, after the conduct of the House of Com mons. Would it not be ;said that alter a vain attempt to s a ddle th a t high spirited aninral' with the burthen of the whole matter, they had been obliged to come back .to that House..as hack that would bear - all the driidgery, and do all the dirty. work of Government. He confessed that he had .seen with regret the name - of the Archbishop of Canterhuty as one of the persons appointed to constitute the Committee that indi vidual appearing as the responsible Adviser of the Crown in the act•of remOving her Majesty's name from the Littogy, l.n conclosion,'he assured their Losthhips that if ever he was in earnest in the course of his Pathamentary life, he Was.on the present occasion in deprecating the Secret Com. : mittee. The, Archbishop of CANTERBURYkiIt himself called on to rise after what had fallen from the Noble Lord. Ile thought the. Noble Lord was not correct in his'opinion. Ile should be glad to see the Act in support of his opinion it-he thought it were true. The- only Act_ he knew of relating to the subject was the Act 'of Uniformity ; Field he was positive it was not there. lf,the Noble Lord could not ,point our the very part from which he" had taken Icis idea, he•shOuld'cotrclode it 'Was a gratuitous asiertion. If - it could-be shewn that his honour or character was in any way affected by his belonging to this Committee, he would be ready to resign that honour altogether. Lord.lloLLANn explained, that he -was certainly misinformed it the Right Rev. Prelate was not the responsible adviser of the Act alluded to. He underitood that no Act whatever could originate with the Sovereign of the country': be must tberfore have his Constitutional Advisers - , and in that situation he conceived the Right Rev. Pre la!e to stand. Lord Luitai;orit, Said, the alteration of the Ll turgy was the• act of the King'4 confidential ger- Van:s, who had advised it, and who were prepared to jiiitify its legality and irs expediency. — The ;et Was done iti the Co - uncil, and the Lords•of 'the' Council who Were - present were perliaps strictly. responsible; but in the : practice since the Revo lution, the acts done in Council were preceded by advice on the part of the confidential ser vants, who were thus the peculiar object's of re fponsibility. - The Archbishop merely acted mi nisterially, and was obliged to execute the Orders in Council. Lord DACRE disclaimed the slightest intention personally to offend 'the Rev. Prel a te. lii bting ing forward the Petition - of her •Majesty,, he had observed that spine of the Noble Lords who formed the Secret committee, had in some, way or other already formed an opinion. That the Ministers who bad laid the Bag on iheTablemust• have formed an opinion was - not denied ; but it was doubted whether the Rev, Prelate was pledg ed on the subject, or whether he was the respon sible adviser of the imissioo of the Queen's name in the Liturgy. Time Noble Lords onn - the other sire might -assume the responsibAity, but they could not divest the person who' was legally, re sponsible of that character. Irthe Archbishop sAmbruitted the , alteration to the King, and re turaed to the Council and declared the King's will, he was the King's adviser; and though not removable, was impeachable fur badiadviCe. Lord LiVERPooL again explained. The alter ation of the Liturgy was made by the declaration of the King in Council. It might he a question whether. all the Lords present at the Council were not strictly respOnsible ; hut as in reality the de claration was ina‘le in all cases by time' advice of the Cummittee of the Council, generally called th e CaLitset, t h e y were th e persons on whom Par liament would fix the responsibility:' As for the Right Rev'. Prelate, he, in communicating • the order to his clergy, had no discretion left hiln• . Earl GREY : said; the Reverent) Prelate, in 'cnni rrtn,icating the Order •in Council to his clergy,' acted ministerially,'and might not be for that act respOnsible. But in signing it; as a Privy:Conn calor, be unquestionably shade himself responsible ; for he .(Earl Gtey) apprehended than the Parlia mentary, power of impeachment was held not only to check pernicious advisers, bitt to deter any per sons front executing illegal commands. Though, therefore,.the _Cabinet Ministers were the pet suns more peculiarly responsible, yet no one who had lent himself to the execOtion by his signature could be exempt from responsibility. in some cases, indeed, it. was necessary to address the Crown :o learn who were its advisers, as in the case of a negative given to Bills, for then no sig narure appeared; but to acs of the CdOncil there were the signatures of the Councillors—r Not al ways," from Lod Liverpool, "iot in this easel; at least there was an entry in the Council Books 'of the Lords present. The Earl DARNLEY said, that he did not rise to snake any remarks', but to state, tl,tat, as the ad vice of the Ministers to omit the name of the Queen from the Liturgy was the cause of the pre sent embarrassment of Parliament, if no other Lord better o i naliied to do it justice took up she subject, he should call the attention of the House specially to is. The House 'then divided, when the numbers were-7 Contents Non-Contents lO2 Majority Adjourned at a Qolrter to Twelve HOUSE OF COMMONS. COLCHESTER AND WOOTTON BASSET PETITIONS. The Houle was occupied until five o'clock on Ba!jots for Conunitteri3 on the Colchester and Wootton Basset Election PetitionF. Nr. LEY WOO up • the naloca of . the Col- ebeiter Elcctioq C.)m , nittee: Thvy were aft to J. lioldsworth, S. liurrocks, Hon..). Butler, R. Dowang,. J. W. Gout, A. Chichester, It. Shaw, J, H, Leigh, W. Astell, Lord Kilgsborough, M. Milbank, W. H. rrew4ntle, J. On"set, - Dodson, P. Moore. Mr; LEY branght up ton Basset Election Con. N. Attyrund, W. ThoLnpson, - G. Doveton, 'l'. F. Buxton, W. J. Denison, C. Brownlow, Arc•hdale, Sir 'l'. Mostyn, the names of the Wont. ,fllittee. They were—.. W. Chatuherlityne, J. Carrot, D. Evelyn, A. Smith, W. Peel. c. Tennyson, J. Cal Craft. .Lord FOLKESTONE presented a Petition from the-Free holders of .the County of Berlis, prtytng•such a Regulltjon of Election tolls, as would prevent a vexittious prottactior! Elections.. • -- After a few words from Mr. F-LEWIS iotl Mr. DENMAN, the Petiti6n wa* ordered to Lle,piinted• Mr. F. PALMER presented a Petition from the nee holders of Reading, pra!ing for an alteration in tile mode•of taking the votes for the County of Bei ks. Ordered to lie oa the Table. _ 7 , GRAMPOL'ND ELECrigN. Lon] J. RUSSELL said, thmt the dehate on this gmestiort had beeiLso long and so often .f . iotirnecl, he flow gave notice, that he woalureertaitily - kiting ie 7 on to,merrow.• MILAN COMMISSION. Sri R. FERWSON gate notice, that he would on Thurs day next bring.forwarti a motion respecting the Milan Com- miss on. Mr.•BUTI'. Mr. DENMAN presented 4 Petition from Mr: Butt, of ts nature similar to that. presented on behalf of the same (Ten tlema►tt to the House of Lords on I.conday last. The Pon. and Learned Gentleman-took occasion to say, that the with respect to the , power of. /Magistrates committing to pri son, in cases of libel, was of a novel lIMMe; that power was considered by malty as a usOrpat'ltitt. It 'night be necessary to consider how far a power, considered by many as itilrecit and enormous, ought to- be confined within the ancient limits of the Constitution.—The Petition was ordered 19 tt9 printed. MitiCE LLANEOUS. Mr. C. GRANT obtained leave to bring in ti Bill to regu— late the Irish Fishei s ; and it WW , ordered, that the Bouse should, on Thur;(l: - iy, resolt•e itself into a Cori:wit:cc on that ActS relatiaz to them. .. • - General FIiRGLION approved of the measure,' with,. ts view to the protection of the Scotch Fisheries. Mr. moNTFA CII laid lupon the Tahle a Petition from the: Chamber of Commerce of Glasgow, regoirilig some alteration in,the mode olcollecting the Duties on Svirits. _ . , . . . The Bill for providiflg a losnasy rem e dy for .c ertain %N.II . ful and malicious fojuries, was re-committed on the motioa. of• Mr. Calvert.—'lhe . Report was ordered to he brought up un Monday. . - ; - - ••• The . Special Constables' Bill went through a Cutoruittee.-- , 'Report to-morrow„ . . The Population Bill went throu4b a Committee.—Report to-morrow. . . _ - - - Leave was given An bring in a Bill to continue the Congo-. lidatcd Fund Act. The Warehousing Goods' Bill went through a Cantnittee. —Report to-piort . The Twenty-nine Millions Exchequer Bills.' Bill was react a third time and passed. The Swage:ling Prevention Bill Was read a second title, after a few remarks from Mr. F. Palmer, Mr. D. Gilbert, and. Mr. Lushington, and ordered to he committed to-morrow. Mr. ETWYNri gave notice of a motion fur to-morrow, , to abolish punishment of whipping female offenders in alt cases what e ver,—Adjuurned. From the LONDON GAZETTE of June 27. BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED. W. Clunie, Saint Martin's lane, baker, from July 1 tc, July 8. _ BANKRUPTCY "SUPERSEDED. A. Evans, l3rinscornbe Port, Stroud, Glo6cestershire, broad• cloth manttfacl urer. ' " ,RANKRUPTS. • T. Willie, - Carisbrooke, Isle of Wight, fellmong-er, July 6, 7, and Aupst 8, at eleven. at the Guildhall, in Newport, Isle of Wight. Solicitors, Messrs. Sewell and ( ;o. Newport. M. PoStuns, Cheltenham, victualler. July 6, at seven, July' 7, and , Augo , t 8, at ten, at the Eight Bells Inn, Cheltenham.: Solicitors,. Mr. S. N. Meredith, Lincoln's-inn; and Messrs. Gwynnett apd Co., cheitenhani. T. toymaker, July 17,18, and Aug. 8, at tWele, at the • Woolimek, Birmingham. Solicitors, Messrs. Egertull stud Co., 3, Gray's-inu-sqUare; crud- Mr; Benson, Birmingham. C. Dunhill, Shad-Thates, tiortlydo - wn, lighterman, .lul7 1„ . 8, 'and August 8, -at twelve, at Guildhall. • Solicitors, Messrs. Sligo's!' and Co., Monnment-vard. J. Mai tin, Liverpool, merchint, 4111) 21 . , 25, and August F,!, at one, at the George Inn, Dale-str,Lt. Lireriiool. 801;6 tiirS,, Mr. Radcliffe,, 'Liverpool; and Messrs. Adlington -and Co., Bedford-row. B. Crawshaw and a Crawshaw, Birstall, Yorkshire, care pet-matinfacturerS, .lnly 7, at six, .lnly 8, and Aug. 8, at eleven, at the Yew Tree Inn, Rokrist Town, Birstalt. Solici tors, kr. Evans, Hatton...garden ; and Mr. Carr, Gurnersal f near Leeds.• W. Mee, Market Flarborougli c Leicestershire, spirit-mer chzt.nt, July - 19, 20, and Aug .8, at eleven, at the 'Swan Inn, in Market Harborougli. Solicitors, Mr. H. Lamb, lietter4 ink, Northamptonshire ; and Mr. J. M. Nelgun, Bartiard'S Inn. _ _ W. Wright, Bellbroughton; Worcestershire, 'mercer, July. 11, at five, July 12, and Aug. 8, at eleven, at the Wheatsheaf Inn, newdley, Worcestershire. Solicitors, Nlessrs.Constabits and Co.; Synpaid'i inn, Chancery-iane; and Mr. Robins, .tit ou 0)6 dge. • - . _ J. NLirti . n, Liverpool, merchant, July 24, 96, and August 8, atone, at the George inn, Liverpool: Solicitors, Mr. Radcliff, Liverpool ; aifd Messrs. Adlingfon and Cu., ,Bed ford-row. T. Carr, Chorley, - Lancashire, ironmonger, July 27, at five, July 28, at ten, and August 8, at five, at the Mitre Inn, Pres ton. Solicitors, Mr. J. Rotherham, Thrognrorton-street ; ant Mr. It Topping..Cliorley. T-Pealte, Itnsehill, Drayton-in-Hates,.sllre:rehire, miller, July 17, .at four, July IS, and August at eleven, , at tine Talbot Inn, 'Drayton-in: Hales. Solicitors, Messrs. Baxter and Cu., Gray's:inn-place; and 'Mr. Stanley, Drayton-. in-Hales. • DIVIDENDS. July 11, C. R. H. Bailey, Swallowfield, Wiltshire, dealer—. July t , ti2l-Tardisty and J. Cawing, Bedford-court, Covent garden, woollen-drapers—July 22, J. It., Brown and H. M. New, Poultry, .stationers—July 18, F. Deakin and J. Oughton, Deritend Birmingham, wire drAwers--. July lli J. Young, Carlisle, spirit merchant—July 18, T. Baker, Rochester, - draper---July. I'B, -J. Barclay,' Old.- Broad-street, merchant—July 22, H. White, Warminster, linen draper—July 22, J. Wyatt, late of Hinckley, Leices tershire, baker-4uly 17, E. H. Wilson, Liverpool, spirit merchant , —July 29, W. Allan, Throgn - rortioi=street, insu— rance broker—Jnlv 22, W. Taylor, . Durham -street, Strand, tavern keeper—Juiy 22, E. S. G. Munkhonsi, London, nier chant—July 22, J. Bryan and W. L. Bryan, Grocrrs'-hall court, printers—July 21, G. Waddington, Blackburn, factur. —July is, J. E. Yates, Shureditzb, pewterer. CER:TIFICATES--JuLy IS. J. Spencer, Maliency, Dei•hyshire, • nail-rtinnufsictorer—T. Danvers and 3.. Danvers, jail.. C4';')oper:s•row, Tower-hill, merchants—R. Coney, Strand, plumber—E. Dixon, .Lamb's Conduit-street, Imberdniber—R. Oastler, Horsfbitb, York shire, dcysalter—J. Jones Liverpool, , . merchant—W. Fear, Bath; cabiner•malie.r. Newington, Tunbridge, farnietr—T. Fisher, Liverpool, rnaster,mariner. . - . Yesterday morning the. remains 'of the late FRANCIS l'Apua, Esq. the. Principal cc)ok ,to the Ic,it4G, Were removed from St. Jamcs's Palace ipr interment in, St. Martin's Church, with every mark of respect to ,a faithful and excellent sere yam of his MAJESTY, for upwards Of twenty years, as he was highly a ye : erne/L . by all hint brethren ofrbe Royal liouseti9l(ll " ( I as a p,lttof 01 it, he was followed to the grave by bet meets thirty and f pr ty priociyals of the. R0y,,,l , floos hold, besides Private friends. Those of the Itnyal Household followtd its six mourning coaches,