The Sun. — London, England, 1819-06-16 00:00:00

wonld go out of the country. Feeling, there fore, that there te a s no ground for the present nifflion, he .i.ottid give it hi, decided negative. 'the &trl of LAUDERDALE replied, and contend• ed that the information he required was essentially necessary to he laid before the House; and that such information could not be obtained from mer chants and money-jobbers. He wanted to have it explained to him how gold coin could be saved from exportation by the tender .of silver coin be ing limited to 40 shillings; The motion was then rejected without a division. Alter a short conversation across the table, P 1 which the Earls of Lauderdale and Liverpool, and the Marquess' of Lansdowne, took parts, ii was arrauged'iThit the debate on the Bank Cash Pay ments Bill should take place not on the second reading, hut on thu question for giving into a Coin niittee, which w as a ppointed for Monday next. -- . Adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS. _• Sir G. HILL presented, pursuant to;an Order of tilt- I - 1011Se, ,certain papers relating to the regih tion of :lie collection of duties.—Ordhed to lie On the nit The Repor' of the Loan Bill was taken into further consi dera,i,on, and the Bill ordered to be read a third time to- • - • row . 1 tol LORD ADVOCATE of SCOTLAND brought up the Report of the Scorch Criminals' Banishment Bill, which was agreed To, ano the 11ill ordered to be read a third tithe .to raorrnsk-, Mr. , ergl•-ant 0N51.0117 gave notice, that on the, 23‘l in stint he would inove fur !care to in 4 Bill to alter,and amend the Acts itlating to the achnibsion of Attornies into the Courts of Lai'.' • Colonel DAVIES mov,tl for , retnrns.showit , c the distriliti tiortit troops in Great and, in the, islands in the k 'annel, disting!iishing cavalry, artiitery, and troops of the tine; and est - . chowing the 'effective strength of the (Officers; Non-corntrissioned Officers. find Privates.—Ordered. The Fisheries' Pkesereatinn, was read it second tittle, alit: ordered to. be up-witted on MOndai, the motion of Mr. Alder'iliati WbetD, the Committee on the ft iSh Pio tuershipi" was ptistponed till that day six , Mr. SH.AW presented a petition front the Merchants and Ti - i/tlers of Dublin against the Foreign Enlistnient Bill,—Or d'ert,tl to . . , CI?VaTNEY ()Waisted leave to bring in a Bill to . am , Lew as to suffering reeoveries of land held in an demesne; and' witti regard to ;ales and 'leases of such lands belonging to lunatics: - . . . EXCISE DUTIES.: The CHANCELL(II?.. wt the EX-CHEQUER moved the se .cotaq of the r:xcisc Duties Bill. Mr. ,ffer e ti a few *ads in 'opposition to the Bill, and ~a:fe. an Objection to the . provisiork made for.levyinz the duty on the stock of Malt now . tin On this .subject be had a petition to present from sonic of the most resprctable Moltsfersin'England. He Golietetlie hardship of their case - blid 'been taken int& ouirsideraVion, ;and wished to know if it wete intended to allow, theta .tulle make the. pay ments . - . ..• . • the CA - I..INC'EL:LOR of EXCIIEQUTtIt.' brief!) : dc feuded the course int en d e d t o h e smutted, .andsaid it waS•fil;- tended to allow the ma.ttsters to make the payments by iu staltnents. tlr. CAL:VERT objected t‘i.the'llew duties, principally on account of the hard and diAressing ease of.the He disapkneed of the . Subject being' brouzhColi so early itt the d•iv. as:much as-he did of „its heiiig brought forwaid at so late aft hoiw . 9s,it,was when.it. fast cotue hvfore the Iloute. : — If the ChatievfloioCtlie Exelieluer t.onld Cioisent to take off part of the dtitj of the:oOct; in . hand,' lie should be more di,po:ed to abstain front. offering; opposition, hut . other Wise Ike AVIS inctiiiect . ty take the .sense of. 1.1,e UQuse on tin: pre : - sent 0101 Kitt. Th'e CHANCELLOR of the XCHEQTTER was under- . stOi,d to say the 41etails of the measure could. he !wire C , 711%,!-, niently go !.:e into whet' the Bili.got int,ottle Conunittee, and t,,,t?, st st, ch. posed, tt,e. Hon. Nrember could take the senseof tr , which he sdijected. Mr t...;.=il2'.'Etcr declined giving the House the trouble' of 4ividing tk-r. orci.ent occasion. . .- - ttw xi..cti read a second time, and ordered to he coni'lnit tee" en'Friday. MONTGOMErtY postponed his motion for Papers rritchard's petition, complaining cif .acts oL AM tic:a Red River Settle . S tnefAs.lin se'rtnight. The Lottery'3ill went through. a Committee, the Report of which was. oratred- !.9 lie received to-morrow. • PUBLICANS' I,iCENSES BILL. . •• •• Tile Order of tire Day b-4. , ing been read for laktrtg foto for r conwlcration the Report of ,71iic,t s' Lieenscs Regulation I3ill, on the. M; . BENNgT the Bill was recommitted. 4,scassion . ensued on several clauses, in which afort,'ine Ma. were made. On arriving- at the clause by Which an appeal was provided from the Licensing Magistrates, . Mr. BENNET expressed his appreitensioo, that in conse quent,' of tier great opposition which that clause seemed to tXT:elitler, hi' should he under the necessity of relinquishin4 it. He stated shortly the considerations which • had •iirged . him to introduce the It was well known that ; there were a great Irony brewers, who, for purposes_of interest, en tered into corporations, became Ma;tistrates ii and ultimately proFrietors of public-houses. ThoSe persons were in many eases induct:filo glee a bounty on the consamptian of their owi: liquor, by the encouragement of every kind of vice. He had ieceived a letter frimi a respect aide Clergyman at Exeter, stating that he resided in a parish of that city, inhabited by the poorest classes of the people, 89G in number, of whom only eighteen paid pool's' rates. That, out of those eighteen, serea kept public-houses; fire of winch were within a hundred yards of each other. That, nevertheless, one of tin:Members of the Corporatiott, who was a brewer, wished to set up ano th..v haus, in the parish, agairist the establishment ut.which the in question had in vain applied to the Magis trat,c to his Diocesan, and to one of the Members. The 1-limonralde Gentleman here read a list of the number of brewers ,who were Maii,istrates. in a variety of small towns which he named, and declared the happiness which he should feel if he could lie the bumble- instrument of putting down so great au evil. • . Air. CO?,AtTENAY warmly defended the Magistrates of the City of Exeter against the charges preferred against them, not in the Repint of the Committee on the Subject, but on an ez part 7. slitter-rent contained .in.an anonymous l e tt er . A n d what wa s the whole of this ruizlity accusation? That, in the o;duiun of a Clergyman of Exeter there was one ale-hous e t oo much in a Parish of that city. The Honourable Gentleman frit so strongly that the sense of the House was against the clans*. which he bad .described,. that he abandoned it;. and, hating abandoned it, proceeded to utter calumnies against a body of men who were not there to answer fur themselves. • Mr. BENNET replied, that as he had been -accused of ca lumny, be would read. the letter and tne.naate of the,Clerzy,- tv.At from whoa, he had received it, which the Hon. Member accordingly did. 1.4:11 li:lfllNGTONsaid a few words, which were inaudible iti rue Galiete. . , 11r. COl7 - /ENTAY explained. Lord MILToN said, lie could not help complainint that his Frn-nd !nus c , nrsented to abandon the clause relating to tlr+r•xtl;hs and Tow‘ris.having• separate jurisdictions, where the veil chirfi , :x!Sted. tri the country the public-houses were no (toolsr often its the hands of . ihe brewers; hot the Nlac,is tcates did riot let the evil attain such a head. Ile would press it on his Hut.. Friend not ti abandon the clause. Attu r (virility observations on the part of several Ile.rn berS, x tlitiSion to , :k place - For the Clause ... Against it . . Majority' Some discussion took place as to whether certain part] of :aid its vicinity, not under tke jurisdiction of the City London, one lit to fall within tile Operation of the Bill:, 1 - I,:laie Sumner, with whom the discussion oristinateli, iota( rd tSint lic would not pre s. the matter at pi rsent, . but w uld talc an opportunity of bringing the subject forward in a fotore stage of the 7,M1. The other clauses of the Bill were read and agreed to. .The Ilousc icsumed, and the Report was ordered to be re- Ccitcd to morrow. WEAVERS OF CARLISLE. Mr. CLIIIVEN n•ithed to ask a question Its to a Petition 111:101 tie understood bad been referred by his R. , yal High /Asti Cu Li. Isliaigcrs, froat tlie IVe4vers vf and othcr play , *—',uld any measures been taken, or were any in contriiipi.ition fur tiwir relief ? said he was not in possession of any faithur informal ion (vo this snhject. BREACH O(' PRIVILEGE.—(NEWSPAPERS.) Mr. ‘VyNNR nwved the Order of the Day for calling Cita, les Bell to the liar of the House. svis then called in. - TheSt;iTztt tliiired him to look at the two Paper the hands of the clerk, to which his name appeared as printer aud publisher, and to state whether - he acknowledged them. Air. 13,11 ack:mwledged that they were printed and puhii,,hyd by (dm. SPF.AK I_Judcr whose directions were chey so primed and published—who was the Witor Mr. Bell said, that the Papers tvere printed and pnblisitrd' in• the ' n►dinaty way—that he had in hand the gr . eater p4it of the manuscript fron► which :he Paovr in question had been printed, atn►►untiog to Many hundred - sheets—that the authors or most of them were now in attendance, ~►►<! he had,n6 . douht would be ready to avow and be responsible for Auy of them. . The SPEAKER said, the witness seemed to mis apprehend the question—who was the Editor of the ? Mr. Bell—The Editor of the Paper is a.person of the name of Barnes. The SPEAKER.-,-From whom did. the witness receive the paragraph pnrportin4 to be a rnport' of the speech of ,Mr. Hinne, one of ,the MernUeri of the House ? ►lr Bell said, he was not 'himself in the print ing office that night . ; but he had now in his pos session all the niavuscript from which the report Of the dA);iteitin the night in question had been pri:aeti,,and the Gentleman who wrote that pert of i:, now alluded w, was at this moment in attendance. . - ' The SPEAKeR.-From whom (lit) the - witness receive the ruannscript of the paragraph in the second paper now shown to hitt)? Mr. Mt replied, that during the greater part of• this year he trail been afflicted pith the gout, and therehy'thneb'pevented . froth attending to his duties at tl►e newspaper office ; l►e had been now for forty years employed as a printer ;• but he was not able . to• giVe any particular information HS to the paragr,tpli now in question. All the Reporters of the newspaptT were enjoined to give their reports, with the greatest possible accuracy—to state. nothing that nay not strictly true—and eley were told, that every thing %hich they gave cuss on their own responsibility. 'the Reporters were Gentlemen esteemed to be of great talents, and were very-liberally paid. 1 f any of them had fallen into a mistake, of course they would be ready to•answer for it. - Tile•SpeaKaa said, the question last asked re ferred t o the paragraph in the paper or Monday last. The witness was now desired to state who wrote that paragraph _ . Mr. Bell said, he believed that paragraph must have been written by the Editor ; :but he could not take upon himself to state farther on this sob ieet,'as at the time when it was printed he (Mr. 'Bell) was not in London ; he was in Hampshire: Mr. FIUME begged that the witness niight deli ver to the Clark the paragraph complained of, which be had stated Co be signed by the person he had first mentioned. Mr. Bell sAd, he had not brought the papers now asked for wkli him, as he was not aware they would be called for. • Alr.'Huirg 'said, he tho . ught the witness did not understand the. tinestion.. The paper which be n ished for, was %,vitarthe witness before stated he held in his hand—the - Report of the Debate, as printed in the Paper, Mr. Bell said he hat! not understood the slues tion-4hat Report was now in his hand, and he was ready to deliver it into the hands of the Clerk. The manuscript was then delivered to the clerk. Mr. GIPPS asked the witness whether the Pa per now delivered was the Report which had been taken of the proceedings iu the House ? Air. Bell—" it is." Mr. H. SUMNER asked whether that Report was taken in short hand ? Pair. Bell said, be was cot able to answer that question. The witness svas then ordered to witl►clraw. '1 he SPEAKER then said, that he had received a letterfcon► the Gentleman who reported the Speech in question, acknowledging that he was the per son who had written the objectionable passage. 11e. wished to know whether it was the pleasure of the House that this Gentleman be called in T 4 1e Reporter was then called in. The SPEAKER desired him to look if the paper in the hands- of the Clerk (delivered by the last witness) was written by him. The Reporter—lt was. The SPEAKRR asked whether the Report had been written in the House in short-hand The Reporter said, thritin order to answer that question, it tsGold-be-ttecessary, with the per mission of the House, that' Ire shonid give sonic explanation. Owing to the verigreat inconveni ences to which Reporters were subjected in the gallery of the House, and . the many disadvantages to which they Were exposed, not even the facility with which he wrote short-hand, or all the atten tion or exertion which it % in his power to be stow, could-enable him to take .down, on every occasion, so fully aorl accurately as might be dome under Mote favourable circumstances, what tell front - the Honourable Members of the Hduse. On the 'particular occasion to which reference had now been Made, it had been his lot to he exposed to singular annoyance by the interruption of some strangers who pushed past him, and wholly prevented him for. the time from bearing the particular words which fell from the Honourable Member, Mr. flume. The be ginning of tI4 sentence he certainly did hear. The Honourable Member Was talking • of the re ductions of 6s. Bd. which had - been made in the e%thblishments, and of the, distresses which were thereby occasioned: It he was not mistaken the Hon. Memberalluded to a smile on the Treasury Bench, soul used such a sentence as this—" Gen tlemen might smile at such things, but what would they tn,y when they saw the other side of the pie riire." Just thew the interruption took place,,and he did not bear 'the liOnourable Member finish he paragraph, but be heard cheering in the House. lie asked a stranger sztlu sat bet - ure bid; at the'. '-lion. Member had said, and it was upon th! in formation of that stranger that he had given the report, which he now understood was wholly in correct, lie trusted that the House would per mit him to say, that the mistake into which he had been thus led was wholly unintentional—that he had no wish to state any thing but what he be lieved to be"the exact truth—no wish to injure or misrepresent the character of any Member of that Honourable House ; that as to the Right Hon. Member in particular, who was mentioned in the report, what was there stated was done with no malicious intention, as he had no feeling of per sonal hostility against that Right Hon. Gentle man, and no political animosity to gratify. The mistake, such as it appeared, was wholly uninten tional, and occasioned by the circumstances wh ich he had nrmtioned. Mr. BaTunasT asked, whether the written pa per was a transcript from short-hand notes. The Reporter.—lt was—that was to say, so far as the case admitted, it was a transcript. Mr. BATHURST asked whether the cheering Which was mentioned in the Report was taken from the short-hand flutes. Thd Reporter stated, that he harp a particular mark to denote cheerily, and in Writing out his Report, from this mark lie mentioned, as his me mory served, what was the extent or degree of the cheering. He wished to he allowed to express to the. house his contrition, at the same time, a Manly contrition, for the mistake of which he had been guilty, and trusted that the House would take into consideration die eireuinstances which he bad mentioned as the cause of it. 1f the in convenieuces to which Reporters were subjected by the present state of the gallery were removed, the liability to such mistakes would be prevented. At pt esent, froM the various interruptions which prevailed, and from Reporters often coming into the. giOlery is 'he middle of a speech, it was of ten-impossible for them to avoid some mistakes, and there were always many allusions by Hon. Nli , nibers which could not be understood by the ii' mrter who had not beard the previ_ges part of the debate. As to the chances of such mistakes, lie need only appeal to the frequency of misap prehensions, even by Members of the House, as to what had passed in - the course of debates.—(Cries of Order.) _ _ Tile Spitaltitit informed the witness, that he must confine himself to matter relating to ques. !ions put to him. The Reporter then stated, that he was not aware tbatthe Right Hon. Gentleman, the Member for Liverpool, was not in the House at the time when Mr. Hume spoke, and that lie believed...that 1-I(in..Arernber expre s s l y' to allude to M r . Can ning. —The Reporter was then directed to with dritw. " Mr. IVYNNE - said, that not one 'void of all that had been stated to the House on this occasion had altered any part of the opinion which he had last night expressed on this subject. It appeared that a very strange mistake had been committed, but . although the House must be disposed to enter.: tain a favourable opinion of the individual . who had just appeared before them, he could not view the offence which he had committed as being less than a very flagrant breach of the privileges of the House. The House had certainly very notch con nived at the system of publishing accounts of what passed within their walls ; but t hey would 'depart very much front that which was due to their own dignity and privileges if they failed to visit with their displeasure the person who had been guilty of so gross a violation of them as that which had been acknowledged by the individual who had just appeared before them. The first proceeding which occurred, would be to record on the ionrnals•the sense which was entertained of the publication in question. He therefore mov ed, " That the Paper before the House is a scan dalous misrepresentation of the proceedings of the House—a false and calumnious libel against one of its Members—and an aggravated breach of its privileges." Mr. Baouonatu said, be did not rise with any intention of opposing the motion which was now made. No man was more sensible than himself of the importance which must attach to every question relating to the privileges and the pro . priety of using every just means to punish any violation of them. But at the sante time it ap peared to him that there were some circumstances in the case of this person who had just now been called to their bar. He 'wished therefore to sub unit those circumstances; to the coesideration of the House ; but he felt at some loss whether this were the proper time for entering upon the circum stances which appeared to extenuate the offence, or whether they would not be better discussed at the time when the question should be put as to the pu nishment to beieflicted,—(Criesof Goon; from va rious parts parts of the House.)—For the present, however, he must say, that it appeared to him, that in justice, as well as in mercy, he thought it would be proper that the House should nut vi sit this offence with the heaviest punishment ; and tie svould Submit whether it would not be desirable to incorporate a clause in the resolution now be fore them, stating, that the House having taken into coOsideration,various circumstances of ex tenuation which had been pleaded by the in dividual in- qoestion, thought it not neces sary to proceed farther then to cause bite to he reprimanded. This appeared to him the best course ; for if the House . shonld agree to the reSolution now before then]; which set forth in the most unqualified terms Abe extent of the offence, it might be difficult for them af terwards, when they Cemelo decide upon the pu nishment, to mitigate. it in! any way so as to be less than an offence so strongly described should merit. He therefOre hoped - it might be thought a better course to incorporate into thisresolution something to the purport which 'he harp mention ed. This be proposed solely on the ground that there; were b ecir y cumstances in the case which bud be the individual hiinself—and so stated, as he ,was sure must have produced a very favourable in' h iression on the House,' which might -fairly entitle him to same degree of in. diligence. At the same time he .protested, that if it wete not for these extenuating circum stances, and if the Toff - owe -had -appeared in that aggravat ed aspect , whiChit bore On its 'first consideration by the House, and before they were n possessiou W the evidence which had been note given at the b ar , th ere was no manwl'° Id n l3 d more forward th an hi mse lf to propose or With .Se.c".e lily propo sa l f or v i s i t i ng suc h a n offence ~ " 0 most severe punishment, and thus vindicating dignity and privileges of the House. an d Mr. BATHVRS T thought that the H ot " wo Learned Gentleman who hail just spokea I kea quite right in th e l as t part of what had fallen cfr:xl7, hint. No doubt, too, tenuation which had appeared would be talc fairly into con s id erat i on . Dot at the sam e oi he could not see th a t the House, consi step with a regard t o it s h onour „ and the pr i/j ' e ),, of its Memb ers , cou ld sto p s h o rt of the. 13 W- s ' a es' Con which was n o w m ove d, and which only 6e. forth in ex a ct t erms t h e na t u re of the ° , ff ; e „, il a which had b e en committed.---(!Jere the ,""7„s Hon. Member lowe re d hi s vo i ce , and sP°,, 6e o some time in a tone i nau dible in the galley ;',,, The offence consisted in the substitution of 6t a, ragraph ingeniously an d art f u lly insette d '", ll e f ic f, was not only not h ear d by th e Reporter hints .fig but was actually qu it e different from any l e ; that Lad been uttered.—lt appeared froth the sot count of the Report e r, th a t h a ving himself tot heard any such thing stated, he was yet &O le o s to take it on the auth or ity o f a stran ger, end i d l e although it was a scandalous attack *IP" , 0 1 character of a Memb e r. All this was aggrW:„4 by ihe circumstan ces o f t h e R e p or ter inset 11 that t e House had received his calumny (" 7,(1).; :,j had, however, never been uttered) with ,( anal continued cheers,"—a misrepresentoti" ce tainiy most gro ss , became it was what ,e,a dia wit the krowl e dg e o f th e R e p or t er h IMSei" ba Mr. PbIILLIPS said, that as an honest man could not 'vote for this R e s o l u ti on . Every m et e s ' her of the House must know how often mist" e l and misapprehensions occurred in the course of debates. For himself he must say, that he el l ; tainly had heard e xp ress i ons use d to wards t Right Hon. Member for Liverpool on marts ° S casions, which s e emed to hi m very similar to attributed, as it now appeared incorrectly, t o t 7 o . Hon. 111cmhet.(Mr. Hume) ; and there w 3 ‘ wonder, for certainly that blig h t Hon. Golti' lu .' " l; had rather a dispssition to mi x the lodicrno the setiotts, and to amuse himself upon serf 64 tressing subjects.—(Much murtuuliog ) Lord CASTLEREAGH said, if he had eotertalu any doubts as to the vote which he should on this occasiou, what fell from the Hon. Al e : 111 : her who spoke last would have determined 1111- d It Members were thus to indulge their fancies, at e to use expressions, of a nature which would i c libellous and offensive if put forth t o the public' ' ll , was very ptain What the privileges of the 1 4 " 5 , must come - to. With respect to the present citiesti tion, although certainly the House must be tuned prepossessed in favour ofthe Gentleman who ' l 4 been now brought before th em , y et i t must considered that the truth or falsehood of the re' port was a thing which very little coocerned thel decision of the House, as in-either case there tiva a distinct breach of privilege. Mr. ABERCROMBIE admitted that the -troth or falsehood of the Report did not make it the les s l breach of privileg e —th at t h e H ouse was boon" on this occasion to vindicate its dignity—that 81 : bar,by the yet st i a t t b em ec e a n in t e m t a n d e e e h tl y ty tl o tei t L i e ; though a very f a vo ura bl e i mpression must hay been f Hpor utes producedrea totthe adopt sonic measure to vindicate it. dignity., • Lord COMPTON said, that he recollected a c ars which he thought might guide the conduct old' . House in this case. In 1812 a mistake of as gr esi a description had been committed, by attributie 6 to a Member of the House certain passages io tlts evidence of a witness which it had been thougl i necessary to expunge from the Journals. A' i , , though th a t m i srepresentation was more gro s s than the present, and more dangerous in its con' sequences, as it exposed the Member to the in-: dignation and fury of the populace, yet it bact not been thought necessary to proceed fartheg against the printer of the paper after his publish' ing an apology and disavowal. Mr. PROTHEROE, in justification of the B e : porter, thought it his duty to state, that at tia time when the Hon. Member (Mr. Hume) spoke the sentence which had been mistaken, there ee" tainly was a smile on the Ministerial Bench . : though o f a dif ferent nature and differently Muffe d to by the Hon. Member front what was stated the Report. At the same time he must retniolk the House, that the Right Hon. Gentleman (M r : Canning) had said last night, when the subject' was before the House, that if there was any Me o34 , bee who believed that the misrepresentation %ca w , not wilful an d ma li c i ous , h e would not proceet` farther in the matter. Now he put it to th e House, whether it did not now appear that the misrepresentation was unintentional, and doll , without any malice. Mr. Hurac allowed, that there had been a smiO on the Ministerial Beach at the time. mentioned , and that he had alluded to it. Mr. BATLIULST remarked, that the offensive p 414 sage was introduced after the passage which men" tinned the smile. Mr. C. IltrrcittNsost thought it fully appeare4 that the misrepresentation was not Wilful or u 1 licions. Mr. BRAND, said, if the motion now before the House had been put last night, he should have agreed to it at once, because it then seemed to be the opinion of every Member, as it, was his own' that the misrepresentation was wilful. But be could not agree to a motion which called it a scan' dalous misrepresentation. Considering, the ex' traordinary diligence and ability manifested 11 the Gentlemen who reported the debates of. the House, he thought it would; be better to provitle them-with reasonable accommodation, and make them more responsible for.the accuracy of their reports,_ Mr. tVYNNR called the attention of the Hoag, to the words of his motion. It stated the rnisreo presentation to be " scandalous." He begged the Clerk to read the words of the Report,—[The Clerk then read the words.]—Hc would put it to the House whether the words of the Report were not scandalous, Jimd also according to the other words of the motion, whether they were nor " calumnious," and, as such, .whether they.xece not an " aggravated breach of the privileges of the House ?" Lord BINNING, alluding to what was said by Ike Rigl as 14 lutii tef e thei ib j a iHr kis ti t , Ibit, 4 tei 5u.5,, krld Co ri Picn di t , te th e 4 nt nit Il t 4 11 the