The Sun. — London, England, 1841-11-17 00:00:00

MORNING SUN 42d Foot—Lieut. T. Kinlock to be Captain, by purchase, vice Ramsay, who retires; Ensign F. Wade to be Lieut., by purchaee ' vice Kinlock, Nov. i 6; Lieut. G. M. Ross, from the 57th Foot, to be Lieutenant, vice Wade, appointed to the 98th not, Nov. 17 ; J. 0. Barnett, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Wade, Nov. 16. 46th Foot—Lieutenant W. Peacock to be Captain, by pur chase, vice Wharton, who retires ; Ensign P. B. Bicknell to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Peacock ; G. C. Fitzgerald, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Bicknell, Nov. 16. 47th Foot—J. Peacock, -Gent, to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Domville, appointed to the 29th Foot, Nov. 16. 58th Foot—Captain L. J. Westropp, from half-pay 95th Foot, to be Car e tain, vice R. Hutton, who exchanges ; Live tenant C. L e Nugent to be Captain, by purchase, Ylce Westropp, !rho retires ; Ensign I. R. Cooper to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Nugent ; Second Lieutenant L. J. Thomp son, fie rn the 21st Foot, to be Ensign, vice Cooper, Nov. 16. 6 1 " th Foot—Captain T. Crombie to be Major, by purchase, erce Fitz Gerald, who retires; Lieutenant W. Everard to be Captain, uy purchase, vice Crombie ; Second Lieutenant 'l'. S. Armstrong to be First Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Everard ; E. Bellairs, Gent., to be Second Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Armstrong. Nov. 16. 134th Foot—Capt. M. Day, from the 20th Foot, to be Cer tain, vice M•Call, who exchanges, Nov. 16. es‘h Foot—Lieut. J. Ble.ekburre to be Captain, by purchase, vice Hamilton, who reties; Ensign W. W. Maunself, te be Lieu'enant, by purchase, rice Blackburn ; W. Williamson, Gent., to be _benign, by purchase, Vice Meunsell, Nov. 16. 88th F. a—Lieut. J. Walker to be Captain by purchase, vice O'Malley, who retires ; Ensign E. H. Maxwell to be Lieu tenant be purchase, vice Walker ; R. J. Algood, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Nlaxwell, Nov. 16. 92d Foot—Ensign W. Dalzell to be Lieutenant, Without purchase, vice- Gordon, deceased, Aug. 28 ; Ensign G. G. H. Jobristane to be Lieutenant, without purchase, Nov. 16. To be Ensigns, without purchase—Sergeant-Major D. M'Queen, vice Davies, vies, deceased, Nov. 14; E. P. Mann, Gent., vice Da'zell. Nov. 15 ; A. Macdonald, Gent., vice H. Johnstone, Nov. 16. To las Adjutant—Lieut. is:. D. Mackenzie, vice Sethe:lat d, promoted, Nov. 16. 9 ith Foot—Captain R. M. Beebee, from the 4J:h Fcot, to be Captain, vice Longworth, oho exchanges, August 27. 95th Foct—G. Hicks, Gent. to be En ign, by purchase , vice Craigil, promoted in the 7th Foot, Nov. 16. 98th Fore.—To be Lieutenants without purchase—Lieu tenant and Quartermaster W. 11. Rogers, from the 95th Foot; Lieutenant F. Shelton, from the 44th Foot, Nov. 16 ; Lieut. T. F. Wade, from the 42d Foot, Nov. 17. To be Lieutenant, by perchase—Ensign P. F. Hussey, vice Rogers, who retires, Nov.N 18. To be Ensign, by purchase—A. F. Steele, Geet., vice Hussey, Nov. 18. To be A sgistant- Surgeon—E. H. Blake, M.D., Nev. 16. :3tl West India Regiment—Lieut. D. Cooper,sfrowthe 17th Root. to be Cspta'n, without purchase, vice Nicolay, appointed 4,0 the 29th Foot, ! Noy. lit ; Captain P. Hrinnesiey, from the half-pay Una'taehed. to be Captain, vice Cooper, appointed to the 17th Foot, Nov. 17. rNATTACHED —Leutena.nt J. B. Wheatstone, 'from the 53d Foot, to be Captain, without purchase, Nor. 16. HOSPITAL STAFF.—D. Kennedy, M.D. to be .ACistant- Surgeon to the Forces, vice Boyle, deceased, Nor. 5. BREVET.—To be Lieutenant-Coloael in the Army-Brevet Major L. J. Westropp, of the 58th Foot, Jan. 10, 1837. To be Majors in the Army—C. L. J. Westrepp, of ;the 58th root, July 19, 1821 ; Captain. R. B. Wolselev, of the 41st Fort, June 28, 1838; Lieutenant W. F. Hay, Adjutant ('f the East India Company's depot at Chalern, to have the tempo rary rank of Lieutenant in the Army while se employed, Nov. 16. ERRATUM in the " Gazette" of Sept. 17, 1841.—Rifle Bri gade—For Sir Henry Tyrwhitt " Jones," Bart., to be Second Lieutenant, read, Sir Henry " Tyrehitt," Bart., to be Second: Lieutenant. Commis'ions by the Lord Lieutenant of Ross shire. J. J. R. MacKenzie, Esq., jun., to be Deputy Lieutenant, Nor. 12. The following places have been duly registered for solemniz - ing marriages therein, pursuant to the Act 6th and 7th William IV. chap. 85. Salem Chapel, Sedbergh, Yor'eshire. The Baptist Chapel, New Melton, Yerkshire. DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY. GEORGE HUDSON, victualler, St. Peter the Apo3te, 151 e of Thanet, Kent. BANKRUPTS. ROBERT ROBERTS, wire -merchant, Gower-s'reet North, to surrender Nov. 23, at half-past eleven, and Dec. 28, at twelve, at the Coert of Baukruptcy Whi:more, offi cial assignee ; Wal-s and Son, Hart-street, Bloomsbury. WILLIAM STRAKER, bookseller, West Strand, Nor. 23, at half-past one, and Dec. 28, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Gibson, official assignee, Basinghall-street ; Hopkinson, Red Lion-square. THOMAS MORTON JONES, merchant, Yardley, Wor testerahire, Nov. 26, and Dec. 28, at two, at the Waterloo rooms, Birmingham. Rowland and Young, White Lion court, Co!nhill, London ' • Tyndall and Son, Birmingham. JAMES CROI' , T, dyer, Apperley-bridge, Leeds, York shire, Nov. 24, and Dec. 28, at ten, at the Cornmissioners% rooms, Leeds. Walker, Furnival's Inn, London ; Blackburn, Leeds. .WILLIAM EMANS, bookseller, Aldersgate-street, Nov. 30, and Dec. 28, at elevnn, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Tur quend, Corhall-buildings, official atsignee ; Nortons, New str t, Bit hepse GEORGE BARRETT, butcher, Ecclesfield, Yorkshire, Dec. 1 and 28, at twelve, at the Town-hall, Sheffield. Bran son, Sheffield ; 111,vs, Cicak-lane. London. GEORGE BUGG, builder, Exmouth-street, Clerkenwell, Nov: 23, at half past twelve, and Dec 28, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Belcher, official assignee ; King, Win chester-buidings, Great Winchester-sheet. THOMAS hiLL, jun., and WILLIAM BROOKF.S, ercharns, St. Mary Axe, Nov. 24, at two, and Dec. 28, at eleven, at the Cowt of Bank' uptcy. Johnson, official assignee, 13asinglail street ; Fisher, Bucktersbury. HENRY GREVES, timber-merchant, Warwick. Nov. 22, and Dec. 24, at the Lansdowne Hotel, Leamington Priors. Cary, St. Swithin'e a lane, London; Kitchin, Warwick. FRANCIS, BRITT AN, woollen-drawr, Br;stol, Nov. 27, and Dec. 28, aneleven, at the Commivioners' Rooms, Man chester. Malrinson and Sanders, Middle Temple, London; Atkinson and Saunders, Norfolk-street, Manchester. ANTHONY - M RLA ND SO ULBY, w ine -merchant, Saint Mary-at- RAI, Nava23, at half past twelve, and Dee. 28, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Green, Alderman- bury, effiaial assignee ; Ogden. St. Mildred's Court, Poultry. EDWARD M ouN TFoR.D and FREDERICK MOUNT FORD, drapers, Bath, Nov. 26, and Dec. 28, at eleven, at the Court cf Bankruatev. Groom, official assignee, Abehurch. lane, Lombard-street ; Ashurst, Cheapside. MILES COE, laceman, Goldsmith-street, Wood -street, Cheapside, Nov. 24, at three, and Dec. 28, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Lackington, Coleman-street-build ings, official assignee ; Carter and Gregory, Lcird Mayor's Court-office. JOHN CROWTHER and JOHN BUTTERWORTH, black becr brewers, Leeds, Nov. 24 and Dee. 28, at two, at the Commissioners'-rooms, Leeds. Wilson, Southampton street, Bloomsbury ; Payne. Eddison, and Ford, Leeds. LEOPOLD NEUMEGEN, bookseller, Highgate, Dec. 1 and 28, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Johnson, Basing ball-street, official assi g nee; Davis, Charlotte-street, Be - forl-square. GEORGE TURK, saddler, Cheltenham, Nov. 26 and Dee. 28, at twelve, at the Royal Hotel, Cheltenham. Stiles. ChAtenham ; Carter and Lindsell, Raymond-buildings, Gray's Inn, London. _. JOHN NIGHTINGALE, innkeeper, Rusholme, Lanca shire, Nov. 27 and Dec. 28, at twelve, at the Commissioners rooms, Manchester. Creswell, Manchester ; and Gibson, Blanchester; Chesitohne, Hale, and Gibson, Lincoln's Inn fields, London. WILLIAM MORGAN, bookseller, Longdon, Staffordshire, Dec..l, at one, and Dec. 28, at twelve, at the Swan Hotel, Lichfield. Tatham, Staple Inn, London; Eggington, Lichfield. WILLIAM LISTER, cloth manufacturer, Roldey, York shire, Nov. 24, and Dec. 28, at twelve, at the Commercial buildings, Leeds. Walker, Furnival's Inn, London; Black burn, Leeds. JOHN LEWIS, coal master, Hockley Colliery, Sedgley, Staffordshire, Dee. 1, and Dec. 28, at ten, at the Swan Hotel, Wolverhampton. Brown, Bilston, Staffordshire; Williamson and Hill, Verulara-buildings, Gray's Inn. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. W. Dennis and C. Taylor, tobacconists, Eyre-street-hill, Leather-lane-W. Elliott aod J. Rogers, bat manufacturers, Charles-vreet,'.l3lackfriars-road -J. North sen., and J. North, jun., lace manufacturers, Woodhouse Eaves, Leicestershire- J. Aitken and E. Hawkins, boot makers, High Harrogate, Yorkshire-J. Lovell, H. W, Down, and G. Rood, skin ma nufacturers, Baltonsborough, Somersetshire (so far as regards H. W. Down)-S. Swindel and J. Bulbeck, linen drapers, Hipperbolme, Yorkshire -T. Balmer and R. Goolden, water carriers, Welchpo o l, M ontgomeryshire -J. Took and W. 3eales, nurserymen, Little Dunham, Norfolk-J. L. Foster, G. J. Lloyd, and P. R. Teulon, attorneys, Fish-street-hill, City-J. Walker and J. Wadsworth, dyers, Leeds, Yorkshire-J. E. Piper and T. Cooper, chemists, Uppe r East Smithfield-A. and T. Southwell, grocers, Brig and T. Green, steel pen manufitacutenir,eras'n,dSliopshire-W. Rowe mingham-H. W. Ruel, T. Jones, C. F. W. was hers, Goswell-street-J. and D. Caner E. Jones, sweep chemists, Horn castle, Lint olnshire-A. Spoor, sen.' and A, E. Ipo k or, jun., builders, Newcastle-upon-Tyne -A. Bowker e a r n , d and M. Bowker, brewers, Pendleton, Lancashire-C, Do w d Bent, ship brokers, London-G. C. Welsford and J. Gibson '''. , Birkenhead, Cheshire-J. coal merchants, Weymouth, Dorsetshire-W. Taylor and W. p-bnilders, Marypor H. Mackenzie, coral dealer. J. Airey, H. Blake, and J. M 033, shil,_bttilders, t. Peat, SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS. MATTHEW HALL, merchant, Troon, Nov. 19 and Dec, 10, at one, a'. the Portia - Id Arms Inn, Troon. JA3ft:s KNoX, Silverbuthall, Nov. 22 and Dec. 10, at twelve, at the Tower Inn Hawick. /I EDDER WICK KI and RAaa eN , ship-builders, Glasgow, N.nr. 22 and Dec. 13, at twe lve, at the Office of J. Monteith, Glasgow. LOYAL SOCIETY OF ANCIENT BRITONS. A meeting of the above Society was held yesterday at the Freemasons" Tavern, Great Queen-street, Drury lane, for the purpose of getting up an Address to be presented to her Majesty the Queen, congratulating her on the auspicious event which has recently taken place, and which has given the Throne of England an heir apparent in the person of his Royal Highness the Duke of Cornwall, the future Prince of Wales. The meeting was called for twelve o'clock precisely, but there were but few of the Society present. Williams took the chair, and was sup ported by Messrs. Jones, Evans, Syrinnds, Hughes, Davis, Hugh Edmonds, Ellis, 0. W. Thomas, Wm. Thomas, Wm. Jones, and Drs. Rollin:els and Richards. The CHAIRMAN immediately rose and said that he had received a letter f.-om the Secretary, aplogising for his nen-attendance at the meeting, but stating the address 'would be ready as soon as the Prince of Wales was ga- Eetted. A person had been sent to search the records at the Isritish Miiseuru for the purpose of ascertaining the usual eeurse on such an occasion. As soon as the Prince of AV les was gazetted, the Society of Loyal Ancient Bri tons would call a general public meeting, due notice of which w ou ld b e given. The Chairman then said, teat as that was but a preliminary meeting they would then adjourn. Th e "inururaeut was then moved and carr i e d, an d the meeting separated at half-past twelve o'clock. ODY OF A RESPECTABLY•DRESSED MAN FOUND IN THE RIVER. —On Monday an inquest was held in the vestry hall of St. John's Church, Horielydown, before Mr. Payne, the City Coroner, on view of the body of a man, unknown, apparently about 35, and of respectable appearance, who was found drowned in the river, off Horselydown. It appeared, from the e‘idence, that on Saturday morning last, between seven and eight o'clock, the body of the deceased was discovered floating under a barge in the middle tier of vessels. The de ceased appeared to have been in the water about ten or twelve days. The inquiry was adjourned until Saturday next, in the hope that the friends of the unfortunate / flan might be traced if possible. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Nov. 16. IN THE MATTER OF TAYLOR, A LUNATIC.—JUDGMENT. The LORD CHANCELLOR gave judgment to-day in this lunatic petition, which was argued before the Court a short time since. His Lordship said that the case came before. him on a question of costs, the application being on the part of Mr. Butt, a solicitor of that Court, for the costs of defending Mr. John Taylor against a com mission of lunacy. A similar petition to the present had been presented to the late Lord Chancellor and discharged with costs by him, most properly, 'on the ground that there was no evidence of a retainer having been given by Mr. Taylor to Mr. Butt. An application was afterwards made by Mr. Butt for leave to file an additional affidavit, which application Lord Cott nham had most properly refused to accede to; at the same time, however, stating, that the petition being discharged with costs, would not prevent Mr. Butt from presenting another petition stating the evidence of the retainer. In consequence of that suggestion the present petition was filed, and in support of it an affidavit had been made by Mr.'Butt, in which he stated that the reason why he did not insert in the former pc tition any evidence with respect to the retainer was, that he thought it was meant, looking at the course that had been pursued by the parties who opposed the petition , not to take any objection on that head, but solely on ie ground of the incompetency of the testator to bind himself by any re tainer. Now, the questiorrs for the consideration of the Court with respect to the present petition were two— first, whether there was a retainer; and next, whether Mr. Butt had reason, when he accepted that retainer, to consider John Taylor in that state of mind which would justify him in accepting the retainer. With respect to the first point, as to the retainer, the evidence on the - whole appeared to his Lordship to be satisfactory. A bill had been filed in the name of John Taylor, and Mr. Butt had acted as his solicitor for two years ; out of „that proceeding, the present commission of lunacy aroee. On going to one of the offices, Mr. Butt was informed of the intention to sue out the commission of lu nacy against Mr. Taylor ; immediately upon hear ing this, Mr. Butt communicated the intelli gence he had received to Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Butt had sworn that upon his communicating that in-. telligence he was directed by Mr. Taylor to take pro ceedings to oppose the issuing of the commission. Shortly afterwards, Mr. Butt, being apprised that a pe; tition had been lodged in the office of the Secretary of Lunatics Tor a commission, entered a caveat against it. After having done this he informed Mr. Taylor of the course he had pursued, who wrote to him thank •ing him for what -.he had done to protect him from the unnatural condttt of his sons, and desiring him to present a petition to the Lord Chancellor for the. purpose of selling out so much of the stock in Court as would be sufficient to defray the expenses of opposing that commission. His Lordship, after reading the evi dence in this respect, observed, that if the present was a question fur a Court of, Law, for the purpose of weer tabling whether Mr. Taylor had retained Mr. Butt, he thought the evidence he had just adverted to would be sufficient to justify the Jury in finding a verdict for the plaintiff: It had, however, been suggested in the course of the argument that Mr. Butt knew well the course he ought to pursue, because when the pro ceedings in Chancery commenced he got a retainer of a formal description from Mr. Taylor. Now, with respect to that his Lordship thought it open to this remark, that when the commencement of proceedings in Chancery took place it was not at all .an unnatural transaction that such a formal retainer should be required by Mr, Butt. On the whole, his Lordship was clearly of opinion there was abundance of evidence from the facts that had been stated to satisfy him that there was a retainer on the part or John Taylor given to Mr. Butt. Then the. next question would be, whether Mr. Butt really considered John Taylor of sound mind, and in a proper state to enter into a retainer of the description his Lordship had adverted to ? Now, upon that point Mr. Butt and his clerk swore positively that they always considered Mr. Taylor of sound mind, and in that im pression they were supported by Mr. Davidson, the me dical attendant of Mr. Taylor, who had given similar evidence before the Jury upon the inquiry into -, the soundness of hiS mind ; and several other eminent men had given similar testimony. It was true that the Jury had found Mr. Taylor to be of unsound mind, but, at the same time, it was to be recollected that they were not unanimous in that respect. On the whole of the case, therefore, his Lord skip was clearly of opinion that there was sufficient to justify him in thinking that Mr. Butt had exercised a sound discretion, that he had acted bona fide, and that, therefore, he was entitled to his costs. The payment, however, of those costs must not interfere with the maintenance of the lunatic ; but if after that was ade• luately provided for, there was any surplus to satisfy he claim of Mr. Butt, it must be liquidated out of the unatic's estate. WOODC XIE V. RENNECE. The further arguments in this part-heard appeal were Oen resumed. The only question in the ease is as to the alidity of a power of al pointment. The LORD CHANCELLOR postponed his judgment. ROLLS'- COURT, Nov 1 6. This being petition day," the Master of the Rolls was occupied all the morning in hearing petitions, few of which were of any general interest. RE tROWN'S CHARITIES. Mr. WOOD said this was the petition of certain vestry men of the parish of Stratford-le-Bow, praying for the transfer of a certain trust-fund from the Rev. Hamlet Harrison, the Rector, and another gentleman, The ttur veying trustees to Mr. W. Hunter, who had been , elected a trustee. The petition was presented under the. Act 52 George. 111., and stated that the testatrix, Mrs. Brown, by her will left to the Rector for the time being of fire - parishes, of which Stratford-le-Bow was one, and to two other trustees in each pa rish, to be nominated by the vestry, the suns of 1,4001. Three per Cents., on trust to pay the sum of 201. per year to the minister, on condition of his cate chising the children once a month in the church, and preaching a sermon in Epiphany. She also directed 21. to be paid to the sexton, and ii. to the clerk, and the re sidue arising from the fund to be expended in the pur chase and distribution of Bibles and religious tracts among the children who were catechised. At a meeting of the vestry on the 19th January, Mr. W. Hunter, one of the parishioners, was appointed a trustee in the room of Mr. Bulwer, deceased, and his appointment Was confirmed by a vestry on the 19th February following. A letter was written to the other trustees, informing them of the circumstance, which the Rector answered by stating an objection to the appointment of Mr. Hunter. At a meeting of the vestry, on the 6th July, of which no notice had beer. given, the appointment of Mr. Hunter was rescinded, and another gentlemen was appointed trustee ; but at another meeting of the vestry, at the end of that month, which was very fully attended, the last election was protested against, and declared null'and void, and the original election was confirmed, but the transfer had not been made. The petition was presented on the ground that the vestry having appointed a trustee, there could be no further appoint ment until a vacancy, and it prayed the order of the Court fur making the transfer. It had also originally prayed for costs, but the parties had come to more ami cable feelings, and the surviving trustees were now wil- Ling to mac.'e the transfer on payment of their costs. The MAsTEn. of the RoLLB-- - Surely the funds of the charity ought not to pay the expense of vestry squabbles. They ought to be ashamed to ask for it. Mr. WOOD said he feared unless the matter was so settled, a number of other petitions would be presented, and the expenses greatly increased. He thought it would be for the interest of the charity if his Lordship would make the order prayed for. The MASTER of the ROLLS—I can't do that. Squab bles arise in these vestries, one after another, and •then they desire they may be appeased at the expense of the charity,- Mr. WOOD—The parties feel that the Rector was placed in some difficulty by the two elections. The MASTER of the RoLLs—Yes, but if they have any of the spirit of charity in them, they will agree to spare the fund. Mr. Woon—lt would be for the benefit of the charity to stop litigation. The MASTER of the Ronns--Very greatly ; but I am not convinced that it would be for the benefit of the charity to pay the costs of vestry squabbles out of the fund. I think, if some reasonable representation were made to them, the parties would be ashamed of asking for it. They have quarrelled, and now find they have been in the wrong, and have come to a more reason- . able spirit ; but they want to set themselves right at the expense of the charity. I hope a little more time will set them quite right without it. They are engaged in a work of charity, and should carry it out. ATTORNEY-GENERAL P. PRETTYMAN. _ Mr. PEMBERTON stated this was an information filed ip , the Attorney-General at the instance of the Charity Commissioners against the Bishop of Lincoln and the in the dioceusen of ce rtain fißoget,fo char d itable trusts. In the year 1243, Simon poor persons, a n n f a iancoln, for now disappeared edand endowed an hospital on his manor, the maintenance of lg of the charity .a_ ehapelwarden. The hospital had was , an d that had remained of late years by the ehap , e l w a ar tlhe rents of all lands were col lectedamong six poor persons, en, who paid 24/. per annum to himself. The real ye' and appropriated 8/. per annum the property, however, consisted of fines, which value of appropriated by the pre alleged, by his prede eseen3storeshatopelhwisaro(Nlvenn,usaen.d, In the year 1816, the present as' rebe chapelwarden, Dr. Prettyman, and the estate was thenY. In July, w' appointeda by hi s father the Bishop of Lincol n , held by a gentleman named Ma 1817, the lease being partly expired, 'i application was made to Dr. Prettyman to renew it, to which he replied that he declined to do so, but was ready to treat t for the purchase of Mr. Manhy's interest. This, how ever, Mr. Manby declined to part with, and continued hold it until his deat h, when it d evolved on grave. On that occasi on the leas e was renewedlLr Cc:- 0 I. o for a term of 99 years, for which a fine was paid of 9,247/. ln 1525 the lease was again renewed at a fine of 2,3001, and in 18 34 it wa s a g ain renewed at a fine of I,ooe/. SC) that the sum received by this gentleman for fines amounted to the sum of nearly 13,000/. In the year 1535 the Charity Commissioners appred to the Dean and Chapter, who were in possession of the foundation deed, for the production of the documents in their pos session relating to the foundation, and the defendant Dr. Prettyman, who was a member of that body, admitted, in his answer, that in consequence of his advice they positively refused to produce it. The production of the , document, however, had been compelled, and it was now admitted that this was a foundation for the benefit of thirteen poor persons, who were to re• side in the hospital, and that the chapelwarden was entitled to no more than_a fair remuneration for the performance of his duty. In addition to the large sum received for fines, the chapelwarden had cut down timber of the value of several hundreds of pounds ; and it now remained for his Lordship to say what species TUE SUN, LONDON, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17. 1841. of relief the Court would administer to the charity. He thought the charity was entitled to ask for the principal sum that had been received, and to be placed in the same situation as if the same annual value had been reserved in the last lease granted, and that the lease should be considered as adopted for the benefit of the charity at the time the Commissioners investigated the subject ; but, at least;: he asked that the amount of the principal money receir4 for •fines and timber should be restored. Then a scheme was tio - be considered for the application of the.fund, and he would suggest that an hospital should be built, and that it should be otherwise appropriated, according to the intentions of the founder. Mr. KINDERSLEY, on behalf of Dr. Prettyman, said that undoubtedly the foundation deed was very explicit, as to the mode in which the intentions of the foun der were to be carried out ; but Dr. Prettyman was only pursuing the course of his predecessors, who had received the fines for many years back, and who, of course, had believed that he was entitled to them, but who, with regard to the future, was willing to submit to such directions as his Lordship should think fit to make. But for the fines received since his appointment, which he had received as a matter of emolument, he thought the Court would hardly go back to them beyond the time when the attention of Dr. Prettyman was, of course, for the first time called to the subject by the Charity Commissioners. If he had received any subse quently, a different consideration might be applied to them, but with respect to the othera he would submit to the Court that the six poor persons were not in existence who could have received any benefit from them. The MASTER of the ROLLS—From the titre Dr. Prettyman was informed of this has he been prompt in setting himself right and in restoring the charities ? I. own I strongly feel that when a breach of trust is acci , dentally discovered, and the person who has been in ' nocently, though improperly, in possession comes for ward promptly to set the matter right, that the Court should deal as leniently with him as possible ; but when he contends for his right after` the truth has been discovered, it is a very different thing. Mr. KINDERSLEY said it did not appear that the truth was discovered, nor that the document was forthcoming. He admitted that the refusal to produce it was impru dent ; but many an innocent person, when he found a claim made on what he had supposed to he his property, was naturally unwilling to assist in depriving himself of it. With regard to the timber, he submitted that the money received for that was no more than the ordinary profits arising from the premises. He submitted that they ought not to go back beyond dui investigation by the Commissioners, and that the Court , shenledirect an inquiry as to the application' of the fund. Mr. LOFTUS WIGII.OI. on the same side,' said that it had been repeatedly directed by the Court in cases similar to the present, when a long e period had elapsed, during which a party had- innocently misapplied a charitable fund through the lathes of others —that was, through none of the public setting . him right—not to call upon him to account for a longer period than that at which the misapplication of the fund had been discovered. If it could be shown that the public had told Dr. Prettyman that he had no right, or if the Dean and Chapter, who were visitors of the charity, had told him that the allowance to the poor ought to be increased, the case would have. been different ; but until some circumstances of this kind' was charged against him, he did not see how his Lordship could consider him otherwise than in the light of am innocent party. ' The Learned Gentleman then 'cited the Attorney-Ge neral v; the Mayorof Newport, 3 Milne and Keane 650; the Brentwood . schotil case, Ist Milne and Keane; and the Attorney-General v. the Archbishop of York. He hoped his Lordship would at least make a distinction between charging the defendant with all he had received, and with what might have been considered a sufficient provision for the charity. The foundation on which it stood cirectcd that houses for 13 poor persons should be kept up, and that if other benefactions were made to it, the number should be increased. In the present case there had been no additional benefactions, but merely an increase in the value of the lands. Under these circum stances, he hoped his Lordship would think that relief ought not•to be granted, except by making the defen dant pay what he might have received since the Charity Commissioners had called his attention to the subject. A Learned Gentleman appeared for the Bishop of the diocese, and exhibited his right of patronage; Mr. B.ifiLow, for the Dean and Chapter,:appeared to submit to'the direction of the Court, and applied for the costs of his clients. He submitted that it was not fair to allege against them, as had been done, that they had thrown obstructions in the way of the charity. They had not exercised their patronage for four hundred years, but it had been exercised all that time by the Bishop of Lincoln; and the Act of Parliament under which the Commissioners acted, the Ist and 2d William IV., c. 34, provides against their compelling the pro duction of any documents held by collegiate bodies. His clients had been always willing to produce the documents in question to any person not claiming it as a right, and he therefore submitted they were entitled to their costs. Mr. FEMBEUTON, in reply, said that the decisions of his Lordship (Lord Langdale) went further on this sub ject than any authorities that could be produced. In this case he submitted that the chapelwarden had no more, right to cut down timber, 'Or to claim the surplus of that property than any of the objects of the charity, of which he was one. Ho Mt called upon to say a word respecting the course pursued by the Dean and Chapter. It was not to be supposed that, because the Act exone rated these bodies from the control of the Charity Com missioners, with respect to these bodies themselves, they were, therefore, exonerated from their control when they were trustees of charities, and justified in with holding documents relating to their trusts. There was not the slightest doubt they were bound to produce the legal documents of charities connected with their body, and he hoped his Lordship would set them right upon this subject. He did not assent to the proposition made by his Learned Friend. The original division was a sum of 321. among the objects of the charity, giving a double share to the chapelwarden. He thought that at least the charity ought to have the benefit of the lease for 21 years now in existence, taken from the time the Commissioners made their Report, and then he should be dealing more leniently with the parties than perhaps the Attorney-General would think he ought to deal. But on the part of the Attorney-General, he should be'con tent with whatever his Lordship might direct, but he thought his Lordship would feel that a party whose conduct their Counsel did not attempt to defend, ought not to receive the costs to which other parties were entitled. The .IIAsTEn of the ROLLS said in these cases, a great deal must depend on the conduct of the defendant. Ile would read the answer and see what it said about it. It was a great mistake to suppose the Court had discretion to determine the right of the parties. Its discretion was to deal with the fines. This sum of money, beyond all doubt, belonged to the charity ; but when a:party innocently iu possession of trust money, on discovery of its misapplication, came forward and gave every facility to the due application of the trust money, there after he had never thought it an improper exercise of the discretion of the Court, to save him as much as possible from a bygone account. He believed that from his acting on that principle great facility had been afforded for the recovery of charity property, which otherwise would have been lost. But the promptitude of the de fendant in setting the matter right, was an important element to the exercise of the discretion of the Court. It should not be forgotten that there were cases in which the Court, however hard it might be on the parties, had not thought it right to act on the discretion which it had at other times exercised. There was a case in which Lord Eldon himself had referred the matter to the At torne) -General, and had taken the benefit of his report in considering what was to be done. In this case the Dean and Chapter, by their Counsel, reproach Dr. Pret tyman, and Dr. Prettyman, by his Counsel, reproach the Dean and Chapter ; but the conduct of the latter cannot be defended on the ground that they were urged to it by Dr. Prettyman. lam only observing on the singularity of parties reproaching each other for acts which they seem to have done in perfect concert. Let this case stand in the paper for to-morrow. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT. Nov. 16. (Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND.) SALISBURY V. MORRICE.—MOHRICE V. SALISBURY. His HONOUR was occupied the whole day with the argu ment in these cases, which came before that Court upon cause and cross-cause. The cases are totally devoid of interest, except to the parties concerned. The argu ments had not concluded when .his Honour rose. (Before Vice-Chancellor Kilecier BRUCE.) ' SEARLE v. COLT AND OTHERS. His Hoemun delivered, judgment in this cause, which stood over froth lest week. The plaintiff was the personal representative of An drew Searle, who resided in. Norfolk, and died in 1835, and in that character sued as. an equitable incumbrancer on the life-estate of the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Colt, at Bushbury, in Stafford, that life-estate being derived under a marriage settlement dated 1804, by which Mrs. Colt conveyed this property, originally her own, in fee simple, to two trustees, upon trust for her separate use during her life. Of those trustees, the defendant Sir John Colt was the only sur vivor. The incumbrance under which the plaintiff claimed was a deed, dated April 1810, by which, for valuable consideration, an annuity of 122/. a year was granted by Mr. and Mrs. Colt to Andrew Searle, charged upon the estate at Bushbury; and for the better securing that annuity, the estate was by the same deed conveyed by Mrs. Colt and her husband to a person named Thorpe. The object of this suit was to make avail able the incumbrance of 1810—to ebtain payment of the annunity and its arrears (the bill alleging the annuity to be in arrear since 1820)—to receive the rents of the Bushbury estate, and to render invalid, on the gronnd of want of due enrolment under the sta tute, an annuity deed by which Colt and his wife, in con sideration of a sum of 1,600/., granted a certain annuity to Thomas Abraham, chargeable on the estate at Bush bury. Of this Thomas Abraham, who died in 1835, the defendant, Robert Abraham, was the personal repre sentative. In virtue of that deed Thomas Abraham took possession of the Bushbury estate in 1820, from which period he continued to receive his annuity till his death, when the defendant, Robert Abraham, as his adminis trator, took possession of the estate, and continued to hold it undisturbed till the filing of the present bill in November, 1839. It leas net suggested by the plaintiff that his title, or that of Andrew Searle; was ad id:inieeaisfmtettretisudactationitr recognised by either of the Abrahams. This state of pleadings and facts was, in his Honour's opinion, ii e e Amb o ir f gahh th ta e rnb !i e, l a tl i hv n e t i i i tr aptl ' e s avin c e traisfiteh.,emtieunistfithrmsruietesicpeesteTdot fbt,yoottrhhaee. strength opinion that he would not be doing justice if he detained His Honour, therefore, was of Abr y on d ttoly afhl appeared E rgtt b ests e d.h : i o if r onTi e fi -eh t t h tehi t rne i b Court,ieelcause ssies aaaigssnas4 dismissed Lndhs etaccordingly,thessui rrjiisurviving hnagns trustee of the marriage settlement, his Honour also dis missed,but without prejudice to a new bill being filed against (Sir John Colt) so asked, h a n, i l est a , ghmharoi To o imduo e f nn his own, him, if the plaintiff chose to do so. That liberty was not, however, to apply in the case of Abraham. Against Mr. and Mrs. Colt the plaintiff might proceed in the usual way, if there was any difference between them. a paralytic stroke, which had impaired her in tellects, and one James Benson, - a relative of her husband, had assisted her in the management of her property. The attorneys for the plaintiff' in the present suit had applied on behalf of James Benson to the de -fendant to give up the dc. tments to him; defendant had refused, conceiving that James Benson had no authority to demand them. In consequence this action had been brought. Defendant had seen plaintiff, and had offered to give up the documents to James Benson, if she were desirous he should do so; but plaintiff said her desire was that he should still retain them ; and she further stated, that she had never authorised the present action. Mr. Justice PerrEsoN—Did the defendant make any communication to the attorneys after his interview with the plaintiff ? Mr. MILLER—It is not so stated in the affidavits, my Lord. Mr. Justice PATTEsoN—That had better be done, and then you can renew the application. ALEXANDER V. NATHAN. In this case a rule had been obtained on behalf of the defendant by Mr. Bagley, calling upon the plaintiff to show cause why judgment should not be entered, as in case of a nonsuit, for not proceeding to trial, issue hay ing been joined in the month of January last. Mr. HILL this day showed cause against the rule, and said that the'defendant was an insolvent debtor, who had taken the benefit of the Act, but had been remanded for twenty months for fraud. The debt for which this action had been brought was for 30a., money lent, and was in cluded in the schedule ; and the action had been brought for the purpose of securing the detention of the defendant for the time ordered by the Insolvent Court. He sub 'flitted that, under the provisions of the Act of Victoria, ' abolishing arrest on mesne process, the plaintiff was not bound to proceed, and submitted that the rule must be discharged with costs. Mr. BAGLEY, in support of the rule, contended that the plaintiff, having known of the defendant's having taken the benefit of the Act, had no right to take any of these proceedings, after such a fact had come to his knowledge, and therefore submitted that the rule mast be made absolute. Justice PATTESON said that there seemed to be some contradiction in the law on the subject. By the 4lst section it was enacted that no party should be dis charged out of custody by judgment in case of a non suit until such time as he should have remained in prison the time ordered by the Court, and there seemed to be some contradiction between that and the 85th sec tion. The defendant, however, he was of opinion, had -no - right to force the plaintiff on, and Under the circum stances he thought, perhaps, the best thing would bo to consent to stet procesius. M r . BAGLEY would eonsult:hls client on the subject. THE QUEEN V. TRAVIS. Mr. irAYS applied for a certiorari to remove the depot sitions in this Case into this Court, and for a rule nisi to admit the defendant to bail in the country. It appeared that the prisoner had been.committed by a Magistrate of Lancashire, for felony, on. a charge of wil fully and maliciously stabbing a horse. In the depositions it appeared that the defendant was the son of a small farmer, and was, with his father, working on his father's farm, - when Mr. Entwistle, who was out hunting, entered Mr. Travis's groundS with his hounds, and accompanied by several persons.- That hearing a noise of hounds, he rode up to the place from whence the noise proceeded, and found the defendant attacking the hounds with a p:tchfork, with which_be had been previously working, and the huntsman remonstrating With him, and that - Mr. Entwistle said they were trespasring, and would get out of the field as .soon as they could, when the defendant struck the pitchfork into Mr. Entwistle's horse. On their depositions Travis had been committed for febny. Now he submitted that even on those depositions there was no reason for committing the prisoner for felony, but his affidavits showed that Mr. Entwistle had frequently had notice not to trespass on the ;rounds of Mr. TraviS in his hunting excursions. That Travis had repeatedly suffered from• Mr. Entwistle's trespasses, and that Entwistle had read and observed upon a notice which Travis had put up Warning persons not to trespass on his farm.. That on the morning in question Travis's son had warned Entwistle not to trespass, and that on hearing the noise Entwistle had rode up to the spot at a furious rate, had attempted to ride Travis down, who hail held out his pitchfork in self-de fence, and that Entwistlehad ridden against it. Mr. Justice l'ArrEsoNTake a certiorari, and your rule to show cause.—Application granted. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. 111A1VSION-HOUSE. A Spaniard, named Jose Joaquina Goncalva Basto, ; was charged, on Monday, by the firm of Pinto, Perez, and Co., No. 36, Crutched-friars, merchants, with hav ing obtained from them some warrants, o the value of 5001., under false pretences. .Mr. Theodore F. Pinto stated that Mr. Baste called at the house, and purchased sherry wines, for which he was to pay upon delivery, to the amount of 7001. Upon paying a deposit of 3001., Mr. Baste received part of the wines • to that amount by a transfer order on the St. Ka tharine's Docks, and subsequently he called to take the rest of the wines, and, as witness supposed, to pay the, balance, as a matter of course. The money, however was not produced, and Mr. Basto was informed that the agreement was that the wines could only be delivered upon the discharge of the balance. He stated then that he had sold the wines; that, if any delay took place, his credit would be injured ; and that he had sold them through the house of Mr. John Mitchell, of Old Broad-street. This representation was accompanied by assurances that the transfer order should be immediately returned. Not wishing that the credit of .Mr. Basto should suffer, witness consented to give.him the transfer order for the remaining portion of the wines upon that condition.. This transaction took plane on the Friday, and at a late hour in the day, Mr. Basto called, and stated that Mr. Mitchell would not accept the transfer order, and would not be satisfied with anything but the wine warrants themselves, and that if they were produced everything would be ready in the morning. Witness said he lied no objection to let Mr. Basto hate the wine warrants till next day, upon the assurance of strict attention to the agreement. The wine warrants were deliverecl, but, to the surprise of witness, Mr. Basto did not make his appearance at the appointed time. It was then considered necessary by the firm to send one clerk to the St. Katharine's Docks, to inquire about the wine warrants, : and another to the hou4e of Mr. Mitchell, to ascertain the nature of the transaction between that gentleman and Mr. Basto. At both places the reports were unfavourable, for the warrants had been brought to the Docks, and Mr. Mitchell declared that he had had no transactions with Mr. Basto for years. The LORD MAYOR—You let Mr. Baste have the wine warrants to show Mr. Mitchell that he was in possession of the wines. Witness—Yes. I did not wish to do any harm to his credit, and of course entertained no suspi cion as to the intention of Mr. Basto. Mr. George Allan Mitchell, of the house of John Mitchell'and Co., of No. 9, Broad-street, stated that the firm had not recently had any transactions with Mr. Baste. If Mr. Basto did any business with the firm wit ness would know the fact. The Loan MAYOR—Did Mr. Basto lately call at your house to offer wines for sale ? Witness—Not at all. Mr. T. Ferriera Pintas--Mr. Basto said in his conver sation with me that the wines had been sold by a party in the country. The LORD MAYOR (to Mr. Mitchell)—Did you receive an order from the country to pay f'or wines to Mr. Baste? Mr. Mitchell—No. Nothing of the kind occurred. The LORD MAYOR—WeII, Mr. Basto, what have you to say to this charge against you ?—Mr. Basto said, that having bought wines at a cheap rate at the house of Messrs. Pinto and Co., he went thither to purchase a considerable quantity ; and he said he wanted therh for a party in the country, for the purpose of getting them at as reasonable a price as possible. He was pressed very much for a balance at the time of the dealing, and • he asked a friend to assist him. That friend could not itgeOMpliSh the ol . tject, without having some authority upon which to raise the'eaA, and he (Mr. Pinto) . gave him the order to procure the temporary accommodation upon them. There was no intention whatever to do any thing wrong, and Mr. Pinto would find that attempts had been made to get the money necessary to pay the amount of the demand. The LORD MAYOR—This is an ugly way of raising money, Mr. Basto. Mr:Basto—l assure you it is not what is Called " raising the wind." The LORD MAYOR—It is not the. way to allay the wind, believe me. Mr. Basto—l have had dealings with Mr. Mitchell's house, and that and other houses have sbad confidence in me.. - _ Thelaaan MAYOR—This is a strong ease against you. You are here charged with having obtained documents foi, the delivery of wines under a false pretence. Mr. Basto—l had no intention to defraud. The LORD MAYOR—Where are the warrants ? Basto—l handed them to my friend. The LORD MAYOR—It is evident that you used the name of Mr. Mitchell in the transaction, because you knew it was above all suspicion. Mr. Humphreys, the solicitor for the prosecution, said that the false pretence was quite palpable. The LORD MAYOR—Can you get the wine warrants from your friend directly ? Mr. Basto—l do not know where he is now. The LORD Mivon—That won't do, Mr. l3aito. What value do the warrants represent ? Mr Pinto—Five hundred pounds. The LORD Masots—Pray what is your friend's name, Mr. Baste ? Mr. Basto-:--Mr. Campbell is his name. The Loan Mason. -You have sold the warrants to Mr. Campbell ? Mr. Basto—Certainly not. I Will be able to show that the transaction is perfectly fair. The Loan, MAYOR—You had better say nothing about it. I happen to understand something about mercantile transactions. I shall adjourn this case. It stands over till this day week, and you may go at liberty Mr. Baste, upon procuring two surc ties in 500/. each, and brine. bound yourself in the sum of 1,000/. Mr. Bastes.-There is nothing fraudulent in the trans action, and this is most unjust. It will be found that I have been., perfectly correct. The . Lotus MAYOR—I tell you, you had better say no thine; at all about it. Mr. Pasco was then taken ,by Daniel Forrester, who apprehended him, to the Compter. GUILDHALL. On Monday a lad, named Thomas Cook, was brought before Sir J. Key, charged with picking pockets in view of the gallows. John Hicks, of Pitt-street, Kent-road, stated that as he was standing, about nine o'clock that morning, at the top of Fleet-lane, opposite the gallows, lie felt some one at his pocket, and caught the prisoner's hand in it, and his handkerchief partly out. He seized the prisoner by the collar, but the people standing by hooted him for en . deavouring to secure him. He, however, kept his h old till he delivered him to a policeman. The prisoner had a companion, but witness did not attempt to detain both. The prisoner said he was a lucifer-maker, residing at Westminster. It was the other led who tried to steal the handkerchief, and lie was not his acquaintance. L Sir J. KEY committed him to Bridewell for one month. IfATTON- GARDEN. Of the several cases heard on Monday fit this office four were those of fathers compelled to prosecute their own sons upon charges of felony. The prisoners involved in these charges were all of them under age, and though the presiding Magistrate appeared most willing t 6 afford facilities for their return to honest practices, the parents in all the cases were compelled to admit, though after se vere struggles, that any attempt at correction by further leniency would be .utterly unavailing. In two cases the witnesses against the delinquents were their own brothers, one a child of apparently not more than five years old, who, of course, was not sworn ; the other a lad of twelve, who seemed to suffer much, though the prisoner (aged seventeen) did not seem to be in the slightest degree moved by the difference which their positions presented—the one a ragged, reckless wretch ; the other a well-dressed intelligent-looking boy; whilst the father, who seemed to be of the class of second rate shopkeepers, and who frequently retired to a corner of the court to conceal or repress his tears, could not trust himself to look upon the wretched creature at the bar. The prisoner in the last of these cases did not appear to be above fifteen years old, but was described as utterly incorrigible, and his own admission bore out the fact, inasmuch as he expressed a desire to be trans ported. Three of the ,eases were committed for trial to the Central Criminal Court, the fathers in each instance being bound over to prOiecnte.- MARLBORO LIG FP:STREET. • Maurice Alderman, ungi. sturdy beggar, WAS. pined at the bar. -• Police-sergeant No. t 6, Of i .tke division, stated that about six o'clnck on Iliinday hight he . saw the prisonei. in- Grosvenor-square, begging of . evei-'person he met with. To females that were :".;.one his manner was fierce and intimidating, and a knobVikidgeon he had , with him, which he sometimes made _a p*Aext of assisting him; to walk with, he held up with , what;'' trany. persona would consider a threatening gesture.:. He took him into Cus tody, and had conveyed bun as far as Vigo-street, ate- gent street, on the way to the station-house, witen'4he prisoner suddenly turned upon him and made a blow with all his might with the thickest end of the bludgeon at his head, but he moSt.-Jortunately parried it, but-re ceived it on his shonl4er; c and was instantly felled to the ground. The prison,Ohen set off running, but witness regained his feet, pursued, and secured him. The prisoner was committed for two months to .hard labour. SPORTING,O -TE - LLI.GENCE. THE UNION COURSL. AfP.ETING, N ov.ll AND 12. The Great Fleetwood Cup- (16 dogs) was won by Mr. Houghton's Tyrant, beating, for the deciding course, Mr. Unworth's Unknown. • The Rossall Puppy Cup (16 dogs) was won by Mr. Slater's Solon, beating, for the deciding course, Mr. Eden's Edhan Bey.' The Union Stakes, for all-aged _dogs, (16 subs.) was won by Mr. Houghton's Gipsey, beating, in the deciding course, Mr. Garner's Gammon. The Bold Stakes for 411-aged Dogs were won by Mr. Eden's Exciseman, beating, in the deciding course, Mr. Craven's Carmelite. The Champagne Stakes (8 Puppies) were won by Mr. Hodgson's Zurich, beating, in the deciding course, Mr. • Parry's P. P. The Claret Stakes were won by Mr. G. Hornby'a Harem ; and the. Southport Stakes by Mr. Hodgsou's Zicci.—The sport was good,. INTELLIGENCE ENT RA. —N EWMARKET FIRST SPRING MEETING, 1843. 'TUESDAY.—Nominations for the 2,000 Guineas Stakes:. Exeter's b c by Sultan or Beiram, out of Oita eh c by Beiram, out of Marinello, ch c by Revelle'r,' out of Velvet, and c by Rockingham, out ` of .Di7urd. Ma ; lor's dam—Lord . Orford's b cby - St. Patrick, out' of Wild Duck—,Mr. Treen's br c cl hortonian—Mr. Wre -Tord's b c by Bay Middleton, out of Marw Ps ellina ; and 'br . c by Camel, out o( Moniniia—C-01. Peel's Murat ; and b c by Slane, out of File de Joie—Mi. Thornhill's Elixir, and brother to Egeria—Duke of Bedford's Jerry Sneak—Lord G. Bentinek's Fariniosh, Foresail, and Captain Cook—Duke of Richmondg b e by Elis, out of Clara ; and b c by Elis, out of Odessa—Mr. Goodman's Bother'em-- , llr. Osbaldeston's • c by Muley Moloch, out of Fickle--,-Mr. Bowe's Cotherstone—Lord Bruce's c by Elia, out of Rosalie—Mr. Watt's cby Yaxley, dam by Biacklock—Mr. Neville's • The Knight of the Hook— Duke of Portland's c by Beiram, out of Mants—and Lord Jersey's a by Slane, out of Cobweb. THURSDAY.—Nominations for the One Thousand Gui neas Stakes :—Mr. Treen's - f Bastille—Lord Exeter's f by Jerry, out of Macremmon, f by Sultan or Beiram, out of Fanny Davies, and f by Touchstone, out of Amine—Mr. Batson's Sister to Potentia—Lord Orford's. f by Emilius, out of Ophelik---Col Anson's Hol landaise—Lord Miltown's Birdeen—'-Duke of Grafton's f by Hornsea, out of the dam of Mist—Mr. Thornhill's Sister to Euclid—Lord Albemarle's Anxiety—Duke of Richmond's f by Elis, out of Nanine, and f by Phy sician, out of Young Sweetpea—Mr. F. Wood's Ellen— Mr. Sadler's Testy—Mr. Osbaldestone's f by the Sad dler, d by Partisan—Duke of Portland's f by Beiram, out of Tragedy, and f by Beiram, out of Souvenir-- Lord Jersey's f by Bay Middleton, - out • of Alea—Mr. Ford's Spiteful. • SECOND OCTOBER MEETING, 1843. • No day mentioned.—Mr. Samsbury'3 br c by Camel. out of Vapour's dam, agst Mr. I. Day's Captain Cook, Bst 101 b each ; A.F. ; 1,000 soya. ASCOT. HEATH, 1842. FIRST DAY.—Nominations for the Two-yrs Old Stakes of 50 SOTS. each :—Lord Bruce's c by Elis, out of Rosalie—Sir G. littatheote's c by Glaucus, out of Camtatriatet, by Uncle Toby, out of Dinah, iulTlßP:*!,rtiThlnurn ) s-Bother'ent. 1843.--TUESDAY.—Nominations for the Ascot Derby S takes —M r.Thornhill's Broth erMango, and Egeria—G en. Windham's c by Velocipede. out of Guerdon—Mr. Good man's Bother'em—Sir G. Heathcote's Amorino—Lord Exeter's a by Velocipede., out of Galatari by Rocking ham, out of Drum Major's dam-- . -e by Beirarn, out of Marinello, and c by Sultan, out of Lucetta. Nominations for the St. Jamees Palace Stakes :—Lord Bruce's c by Ells, out of Rosalie—Lord Westminster's b c by TouChstorte, out of Languish—Lord Jersey's c by Slane, out of Cobweband Lord Exeter's c by Beiram,out of Marinello. WEDNESDAY.—Nominations for the Coronation Stakes : —Lord Orford's f by Emilius, out of .Ophelia:—Mr. Treen's Thornhill's Sister to Euclid—Lord Albemarle's Anxiety —Colonel Anson's Hellandaise— Sir G. Heatheory's thy Velocipede, out of Lady Sarah— Mr. Bate's f by Liverpool, out of Wild Rose—Lord Jer sey's f by Bay Middleton, out of'Alea—Lord Exeter's f by Touchstone, lout of Amine, and f by Jerry, out of Macremma. Nominations for a Two Year's Old Stakes of 50 sovs. each :—Sir G. Heathcote's f by Velocipede out of Countess, and br f by Amato out of Bokhara's dam— Mr. John Peck's Corodini—Lord Exeter's f by Beirarn, out of Datura, ; Mr. Liehtwold's b c by Samarcand, out of Sister to Mussulman—and Mr. Ley's a by Elis, out of Partiality. THURSDAY.—Nominations for the Buckingham Palace Stakes :—Lord Westminster's b c by Touchstone, out of Languish—Mr. Neville's ch c The Knight of the Hook —Lord Exeter's a by Sultan or Beiram, out of Lucetta, and cby Beiram, out of Ma IM--Colonel Anson's Napier (b. untried). `- • . GOODWOOD, 1842. FIRST DAY.—Norninationi for the Lavant . Stakes : Duke of Richmond's c by Eti*kput of Odessa ; f by Elis out of Maniac ; 'and e by Elie out of Charlotte West—Lord G. Bentinck's Bramble and Foresail—Mr. Wreford's br c by Camel, out of Westeria—Mr. Treen's Young Lochinvar, Bastile, and Chotorman—General Wyndham's The Handmaiden—Lord Exeter's c by Bei ran, dam by Emilius—Mr. Gratwicke's Hopeful—Lord Maidstone's Titania, and a by Emilius, out of Castside— Colpnel Wyndham's Glance—Colonel Anson's Marquise —Lord Bruce's c by Elis, out of Rosalie. THIRD DAY.—Nominationsfor the Molecombe Stakes: —Duke of Ric!imond's a by Elis, out of Odessa, and f by Physician, out of Young Sweetpea—Lord G. Ben tin.-:k's Foresail, and Bramble—Mr: Wreford's cby Sul tan Junior, out of Victoria—Lord Exeter's c by Beiram, dam by Emilius—Mr. Treen's Baitile and Chotornian— Gen. Wyndham's c by VelOaipede, out of Guerdon—Mr.- Gratwicke's Hopeful—Lord Maidstone's Titania, and c by Emilius, out of Castaside—Col. , Austin's Marquise— Mr. Sadler's Testy and Mr. Taunton's cby Elis, out of Goldfringe. NILLER V. GOW. The arguments in this case were brought to a close to day. His HONOUR said that the question to be decided in the suit was purely a legal one, and his impression was, that were he to decide it at present, one way or the other, it would, in all probability, be carried before a Court of Appeal, and the result after that delay would, most likely .be to send that question to a Court of Law. His Honour then, after mentioning certain matters which should be added to the facts of the case, as they now stood, said that if a Court were not particularly agreed on by the parties, the question would be best re ferred to the Court of Common Pleas. STUBBS AND OTHERS V. LISTER. The plaintiffs in this case were the assignees appointed under a fiat of bankruptcy which had issued against James Hardy, who had been in partnership with his brother Edward ; the firm, while th , : partnership existed, having been possessed of a thousand shares in the Liverpool Union Bank. The defendant was John Lister, the public registered officer of that Bank. The object of the suit was to have a cancellation made by the Bunk of the shares in question, declared null and invalid. As the cause came on at the close of the day. the pleadings were merely opened by the junior counsel, after which his Honour rose at a quarter past three o'clOck. (Before Vice-Chancellor WtomAx.) noutniza U. WILLIAMS. In this cause, his Honour gave his judgment for the plaintiff, according to th e payment of the bill reserving the question of costs. RHINE V. CAINE& This part• heard cause was resumed, and the argu ments concluded. His Honour postponed his judgment. The Court rose shortly after three. COURT IF QUErYS BENCH, Nov. 16. . THE CIIIMTENIIAN AMU GREAT . WESTERN UNION BAIL' WAY COMPANY V. DANIELS. • This was an action of debt to recover the several sums of 1021. 45., 1011. 7s. 3d., and 1501. 7s. 10d., being the amount of three several calls upon 20 shares alleged to be held by the defendant as one of the proprietors of the above named Rsilw a y Company. The defendant pleaded that he was not indebt e d ; a nd secondly, that he was nst a proprietor of the Comfst.s. she case was tried before Mr. Justice Williams, at 'S. - alttirigs of the Last Hilary term, and a verdict had for the plaintiffs for 36e1. ss. 61, subject to the opinian of the Court of Queen's Bench on the, following special case. On the 21st June, 1836, an Act was passed authorising the ' formation of a railway from Cheltenham and Gloucester to join the Great Western Railway at Swindon. Prior to the pass ing of the Act, the parties subscribing signed the deed, and paid 2/. 10s. per share, and scrip certificates were given to each of the subscribers. The defendant never executed or subscribed the Parliamentary deed. A notice was affixed to the scrip certificates stating that they were not transferable, but notwithstanding this the certificates passed from hand to hand, so that at the time the Act pass ed a number of them were in the hands of parties who had never : signed the agreement. The 20 shares for which the defendant was sued were taken originally , by Doctor Borrington and Sir Richard Wolsliy. The plantiffs received letters from these parties, stating that they had transferred their shares, and on the 16th of December, 1836, they received a letter from the defen dant, signed J. Denis Daniels, of Kingsland-place, Kings land, Middlesex, claiming to be registered in right of those twenty shares, and enclosing the scrip certificates. The plaintiffs replied acknowledging the receipt of the scrip, and stating that the certificates would be delivered on the defendant completing the register. The name of the defendant was entered on the books of the Company. as a proprietor of these twenty shares, and the seal of the Company affixed in the usual way. When the first call was made the defendant refused to pay, and the plaintiffs took legal proceedings, which were stayed on the ayment of the amount of the call with costs. The defendant also paid the 2d and 3d calls as they be came due, and the calls for which the present action was brought, were the 4th and sth, due 21st March and 31st August, 1839, respectively. No transfer of the shares was made, and the question for the Court was, whether at the time. the 4th and sth calls were made, the defend ant was a proprietor of 20 shares in the Company within the meaning of the Act of Parliament. Mr. CRESSWELL, on behalf of the plaintiffs; submitted that the decisions which had been recently made in the Exchequer Court in similar cases, were applicable to the present, and must decide it. It was there hold that'where a party had done any act which would induce the Com pany to treat him as a proprietor, he was bound by it, and could not afterwards deny that he was a shareholder. It appeared' by the present case that ~the defendant re quested the Company to register him' as a proprietor- of certain shares, and they did so at his request. It ap peared further, that he paid the. first three calls of 51. each, and then he took it into his head to deny that he • was a proprietor. Now the decisions to which he had alluded expressed decidedly that he could' not do that: A person after having taken shares and applied to be re gistered as a proprietor, could not afterwards fall back upon nice and subtle reasoning as to the construction of the Act. Now the 108th section enacted that the Directors were to cause the names of the several sub scribers to be regularly entered in a book, with the number of shares to each, and to affix their common seal thereto, and they were to deliver certificates to each of the subscribers on demand. In the present ease it appeared, that no such. demand had ever been made upon the Com ! pany, but having been entered at his own request upon the he was entitled to be considered a proprietor whether he demanded a certificate or not. The latter part of the clause - showed the object fur which the certi ficate was granted, namely, that in all the 'Courts of Law it should be taken as prima facie evidence of the title of 'the proprietor to such shares, but the want of such cer tificate should not hinder him from selling, or disposing . of his shares. The cases to which the present was analo gous were " the Sheffield,. Ashton under-Line, and M a nchester.itailway v. Woodeack,"'" the Grand June , tion Rail gay. v. Freeman," and their Lordships would see that in these cases all the objections which could be urged against the title of the defendant to be con sidered a proprietor had been discussed and decided. Under these circumstances he submitted that the judg ment of the Court must be for the plaintiffs. Mr. PEACOCK for the defendant contended that the transfer of the shares .could not be legally made until the Act of Parliament kad been obtained. Indepndently of that, by the fifth section, those persons only were to be considered .proprietors who had signed the Parlia mentary contract, and that had not been. done by the defendant—the names of 1)r. Borrington and Sir Richard Wolsley, were those to whom the shares were set down, and until the defendant had been required and had signed the contract, the plaintiffs could not take him in lieu of the ethers and consider him a proprietor; He submitted, therefore that the circumstance of his having sent in a claim to be registered would not render him liable for these calls. If it appeared that he had participated in the profits, or that the Company Intel been injured in any way by his act, then liability would attach, but as the case at present stood the transfer could not be said to be legally effected and the defendant was entitled to the judgment of the Pout. Lord DENMA:sT quid - it was impossible to forget the fact that; whatever the Act of Parliament - required, the de fendant had held out false colours to induce the Company to register him as a proprietor, and the universal rule of law must apply by which where a party makes a certain representation on which others are in duped to act, he is bound by that representation. The judgment of the Court, therefore, must be for the plaintiffs. THE CHELTENHAM RAILWAY COMPANY V. MEDINA. The point of objection raised in this case being the same, the Court also pronounced judgment in favour of the plaintiffs. COURT OF EXCHE Q UER, Nov. 16. NEILSON AND ANOTHER V. fIARFORD AND ANOTHER. This was e r n action to recover damages for the breach of a patent right for the making of pipes for conveying heated air on a new principle. It was tried betbre Baron Parke, and occupied the time of the Jury three days. A ride for a new trial was obtained last term, and was ap pointed to be argued to-day. The reading of the Judge's notes occupied upwards of three hours. After the reading of the,lteport, Lord ABINGER (the other Judges concurring) said, he did not see how the verdict. could be. disturbed.--the elidence was all one way. The SOLICITOR-G IV:ER*I,, did not think it would be; come him, after such an intimation; to take.up the timb of-the Court in supporting_theverdict. The ATTORNEy-G EtiERAL addressed the Court at some length, but, finding the Court decidedly against him, ho said he would not struggle again , t their Lordship's opi nion, andthe rule for anew trial was discharged. EXCHEQUER CHAMBER, Nov. 16. BTARBItIbGE v. UOSSETTI. This was an action to recover damages for the breach of a covenant t o re p a i r ._ From the ev id ence given for the plaintiff it l th ears, de fendantunder the usual became th e ass ignee of the lease of the ap peared th a t a l ease o f c ertain premises in Short's gardens- was granted a c n o ce e d mi i n n t t l o B2 r O e p air for . thirty-one3 e . pre mises in question, where ho carried on the business of a coach-builder. In 1839 the landlord had the pre mises surveyed, and they were found to be in a very bad state. A specification of the repairs necessary was made out, and notice to repair ac cording to the covenants of the lease, served upon the defendant. He had some repairs dune, but they were very trifling, compared to what were necessary. On being remonstrated with he said he had done all that was necessary, and would do no mo-e. The plaintiff's surveyor went over the premises, and his estimate of the repairs which were necessary amounted to 1401., for which sum he brought his action. For the defendant, a surveyor and builder was called., who deposed that five months ago ha went over the premises in quCStion, and offered to put them in a complete state of repair according to the specifica tion served upon the defendant for scl. He was not shown the covenants of the lease. The Jury, after a short deliberation, split the differ ence between the parties, and gave a verdict for the plaintiff, with Bcl. dama°'es. Mr. Platt conducted the case for the plaintiff. Mr. Thesiger was Council for the defendant. BAIL COURT, Nov. 16. BENSON v. GRAVES. Mr. MILLER applied for a rul e, callin g u p on the at torney fur th e plaintiff to show cause why all proceed ings in this act i on s h ou ld not be stayed, and why they should not p ay the costs which had been incurred, and also the costa o f t h e presen t application. It appeared that the plaintiff, who was a widow, 69 years of age, had some years ago deposited in the hands o ;the defendant, a gen tleman of wealth and respecta bility, certain d ee d s and other documents, including her own will, for safe custody. She had subsequent 4 had GOODWOOD, 1843. FIRST DAY.—Nominations for the Drawing-room Stakes :—Duke of Richmond's c by Ells, out of Clara, o by Ells, out of Nanine, c by Ells, out of Odessa, and c by Ells, out of Delightful—Lord Kelburne's Deerslayer .z—Lord G. Bentinck's Farintosh, c Captain Cook, and c Foresail.—Lord Albetnarle's Anxiety—Mr. Payne's fby Muley Moloch,. out of Bessy Bedlam—Colonel Peel's c by Slane, put of Fille de Joie—Colonel Anson's Army tage, and Nopier—Mr. Osbaldeston's c by Muley Mo loch, out of fickle—Mr. Wreford's c by Bay Middle ton, out of Margellina, and c by Sultan, out of Victoria —Mr. Gratwicke na f by Elis, out of Sister to Marvel —Mr. Treen's Bastile—Lord Exeter's c by Beiram, out of Marinello, c by Rockingham, out of Drum-Major's claw, as i .c by Sultan, or Beiram, out of Lucetta—Mr. Byng's Dickens Lord Eglinton's Aristides Lord Chesterfield's c by Jereed, out of Progress, and c Par thian—Mr. Mostyn's c by Velocipede, out of Bird - lime , and c by Touchstone, out of Queen of Trumps—Mr. Bowes' Cotherstone and Baldersale—Mr. Treen's C,hoto nian—Duke of Grafton's c by Hornsea, out of Oxygen — Lord Bruce's c by Ells, out of Rosalie— Mr. Thornhill's Brother to Egeria, and Elixir—Mr.lves' b c by Onus, out of NI opsy—Mr. Sadler's Testy — Mr. Isa ac Day's Brother to Marius—and Lord Maidstone's c by Emilius, out of Castaside. THE MARKETS -YESTERDAY. COLONIAL MARKET. There were few public sales, and but little business was done by private contract. Prices; were, however, sustained in almost all instances. Raw Sugar was in fair demand both by the grocers and refiners,`and about 500 hhds. and tierces West India sold at full prices ; some parcels of white Bengal sold at 70s. to 715., and fine yellow Mauritius at 645. to 665. 6d. per cwt. Re fined Sugar was in good request, and prices.were a shade higher for fine samples. In Coffee it was difficult to effect sales, except at lower prices. Rice dull of sale, and lower prices would be accepted. Pepper difficult of disposal at former rates. Cassia Lignea very firm in price, and in good request. TEA MARKET. The prices were steady, but without any activity in the market. Company's Congou at Is. 10d. per lb. cash. TALLOW MARKET. The prices were barely supported, and the market was cittll. Shall parcels of fine yellow Candle were taken off at 465. 6d. to 465. 9d. per cwt. The arrivals are large, and the deliveries fall short of former years. SPIRIT MARKET. The Rum Market was firm, but the demand was dull, and the sales confined to some trilling sorts of proof Leewards, at ls. I Id. per gallon. Brandy in fair demand, and very full prices were realised, especially ter fine MORNING SUN old brands, which are getting scarce. GeOevii quiet, 1111 C not cheaper. - • WHITECHAPEL HAY MARKET . • The supply was large, and the demand very int a l4l/ 1 except for the fine qualities. The middling and c ` w itpu sorts scarcely saleable. Prices without sin t. Clover, 3/. to 51. 18s. ; Hay, 21. to 41. 105. - . 12s. to 1/. 16s. --------- X 16.1 (From the London Mercantile Journal of Nat il .... et. SUGAR.—On Wednesday the market bore a flat, t e ar ', ante ; on Thursday a decidedly better feeling was wens I Tested amongst the buyers, and the market pres,ova rather a lively appearance ; on Friday the sain e ; ro , 'less was manifested, with a steady dems.ed, and the r ii t ket closed firmly, establishing an advance of 6d. ee _ e ft e in 'mkt instances fOr coloury samples, end full pric e ' all other descriptions. a The demand was uood to-day for all sorted fi: r e /t India Sugar by private contract, and stiffer rates pub ! I ' paid for the better kinds of yellow ; indeed, at se 6d 0 Sale of 117 hhds 2 ties Barbadoes., an Oven° ci , i .„ 6 Is was paid ; low to fine yellow fet ched 603 to ie6,6 s the . biddings were brisk. f r this ' i '' ' MAURITIUS.—T_here - There- good demand -9- a e ea scription, and a public sale of 3 , 000 ba g s weiit off a 't I spirit, at Is advance for yellow sorts, bro low wn P . 5 3,00 rates ; middling L6 - fine yellow 56s to 68s d,, 555, middling. to flee brown 455 to 513 6d per civ est e REFINED. - demand was geed for refin ' Le Ki for home use, and stiffer rates paid: standard st 0 ; 80s 6d to '8 Is: Beaded Crushed in fair eel ° " 'o 28s 6d for the best. ' ' e Ye tiln - i EAST INDIA. -.--The' .market continues to ee _ 0 ,,. , ' differently siiPP)ied with white Bengal, wilt, c a h ; :eiceer flaked for, and cannot be bought except at btLu e ' ',413 18 upon which terms some parcels have been sold by I' contract: efers d h i. The' aices of Foreign East India Seeea c sl e e roo t.-1 depressini of is per cwt. The only public esele.." .b ;Ili - forward:•Consiseed 571 baskets 5 bags Java, I '' e Std' off quieey, bet, the whole appeared to be sold ; I; ° ' l o w e' Wing dry yellow at 17s to 185, good dry, .Y 4 . 0 100 18s ed,...end:, low dry brown at 14s per cwt• -I V, is 4 (11 trerty - 'eransections worth enumerating b i'''''' 11 ,5 plate. ,e t see a ' FOREIGN.—The market remains very a n " vet c ' prices of Brazil have further declined 6d tO Is i •V will ! ' but Havannah has supported previous rates ; la : 21• Bahia at 21s per cwt : good yellow ilavannah le l a of lefeeesses.—There has been a better defe-1 pr ietr West India Molasses during the week, at fu e l ioiY,' good Tortola at e4s, fair Demerara at 235, end ~r e r 01 ; St. Lucia, and other 'Wands, at 22s 6d to 235 8a 1',., lee" Some parcels ,of Bangui Molasses are said to b ; ` I ; is sold at 21s to 22s peiece . t. Foreign Molasses I' r - efe quest, and business has' been done at es to Is F . 9 o gr e TEA.—The approachitsg large public sales el' 1 ;e Sor ia elude business by private contract in free 0 1 if it ioll , and the market is very quiet, without any el.,;' leer" prices. Company's Congou is dull and a ebs ue l •,, - e ee yiz. is 9,id to is 10d per lb casil. nose i el.. h il COFFEE.—There is little alteration tO eite - , i ; 1 home market this week, but a much larger q, ; tlie,"; been offered for sale, which has raeber check ereu,'is • , maid; 'Of lIT. L description - there ha ve b e r, i l',''' et public ,auction 285 casks and tierces, anu e ell 3 '!,f, and bags; the bulk of which consisted. of ".1 c ; f s ' qualities, which are not much -welded fest r s Is'd eequeetly the sales went off without spirit, sill .- O A . a • proportion was bought in. the remainder sole ele . 1. 6 AO - prices. Mocha • has brought stiffer Pri ce ' 7 OI L : es fair request ; mid. yellow clean garbled at 9 75 e : it te :brownisle'at'Sss to 85s 6d per cwt. In other " IP' k 4' e ing' and , Cape _sorts .few transactions have t 3 "( 1 51;7_ 4 i Theensteket is flat, owing to some large Pa r° 'I pr .deelaepiibrepublic sale, but no. alteration can 5( y lie noticed in the value of the article. VP' , , A eir e b6 ' COCOA.—The demand for West India n e e il,be i e continues dull. Trinidad good red went at 4 Et„) l op grey at 455, fair dark red at 42s to 43s 6d, au' ~,'sc b e 405 6d to 41s, common red 395, and inferior g r ' earie per cwt. In Foreign nothing worthy of r el " ol been done. . . A O . NUTMEGS.—Prices are firm ; Cape b oil iii i ,el to 3s 10d for good fair sound mixed Authorsri, letio e ,, ii MACE —A small parcel of .Amboyna, c e e ?tar 10 casks, were bought in at public sale at 35 " i e t ordinary dull, small and foxy. „ v ) s , s h re CASSIA LIGNEA.--Prices have 1- improve d e i .0-,, 1 ' ,1 cwt ; good middling at 102 e to 102 s 6d, re ul f 6d .P O of good colour,' little false packed at 95s to 9 6s t i ta ds ordibary coarse at 91s Gd to 99s Gd, and br.4414'7 87s per cwt. j ov pet PIMENTO has maintained the previous valu e; ,eeil' e ",e tiling rather dull at 2id, and good ordinary at 2 s c- bull;,!a PEPPER. —The demand is quiet, and a pub lic , sisting of 1,500 robins, 1,632 bags Male which was sea-damaged, went off heavily ; s ; ‘ fiee'er. and good fair brightat3idto3ed, being rat her) erue o e FRuiT.—A public sale was brought fog` t e jA r Ol l4 The bulk was sold, and the following are te" :ere; Jars :=lmperial French Plums half and (Oa 'el Poe Cl. 6s to Si 2s, cartons 61 to 61 3s, eighth " il l s et 51 0 5 ' 7/ Bs, spa boxes 71 2s, and eighth boxes 5. t b . t O l3 Prunes, quarter chests 475; and half chests? : 0 new Cephalonia Currants, damaged 555 - to 515 " t • • 1 1 0 .10 0 4 Patras 50s to 53s per cwt. r 6°' bete te fr - jd p• RICE.—The speculative demand for Benga - 0 y id ceased. 2,750 bags offered by public aect i°° a .,a ofPie fordlincgo i w is h u i ra te p l t f i a o s n s a o t l d u a s t t l o l s 36 to s quietly at 12; for good middling new' Java ... L)li' i t° 32s for the low qualities. ; 1)11 1 SAGO.—Pearl is in good demand, and price r, Pus; maintained ; good middling white at 26; 6( 1 tq 'i, i ill'y; grey at 225, and good middling rather gree, V : t v b ey •22s ; bulked and sifted, ofgocd brownish go al ' ' i oi' in at 14s fid per cwt. vii .0; SPIRITS.—In the prices of West Tale 1I f es,tli' teration has occurred, and very little bu s . .. 4 ve e " g o ifol°r 6thdePle3reset,v'et.ncl.o9sJ,, been done, but the last few days the h o lders 1 : 11 ', I cel t o bated more firmness, on account of the at' s 0 0 , or e of a Government contract for iCaT,eOO b tio A't .'•„ll,‘ be taken on Thursday next. The trene: n p c A Dr confined to about 100 puncheons of 1131° 105,0 14 Demerara of low quality, which sold roo f ' Le'eso 26 to 33 overproof ; the price of Pon ; 1 0 ace, is merely nominal at Is led per el°ll r e ' ` ll India Rum also few transactions hav ill phi though easier prices are accepted ; som 5113 • .41 V proof Bengal have sold at is 4cl per sale 4 ' 1 13° 0 ,A 210 hhds tollßenga were offered eit public sale , itc , l f a t , a in at is 7d quality net bright. Brandy has been disr st i 0 8 ,b 0 fair extent at firm rates ; the home trade .of.bees 1 the principal buyers ; fine brands of 18 36 1 !lis s e r iti' ll 10d to 6s. Geneva is firm, but the deo:i s le. de ' il slack ;2sto2s Id is the value of cornmete s- „ Ill'A''' Corn Spirits in brisk request at 105 4d eil"" e ' e t ; 'O l-5 , 1 0Ve Teeeow.—The demand for this article e- -- -c has soand a reduction of 3d to 6d per cwt in u fe • ;0 1 St. Petersburg Yellow Candle of first ens e . " l.- t ;;:e 8 , at 46s 6d to 46s 9d on the spot, and at 46s 6 " ' sin .:blie .04 up to the end of the year. 4 . A pa .„ 0 0 1 Several parcels of Tallow were brought,'" ' l oor A on Friday, which went off heavily, and t' e - s " ' sol o cl l e L s s t . a — bl T is i lled p l r o i l e v e e s r (I)3friccommon - Fish ic lb. a llv : p ' , ,,, , ' : n o s 1, ,' , vanced about lV . Per tun in n a e , l `, r e el 1 ; 6 41 ( I ' stances. Pale Seal, 40Prr tun. Cod ti" 1,0 " 5 , ', P a pale Southern 35l 15s to 6/ lOs per ton. ,c,f;;ceos' has advanced to 375. Rape Oil at forfocrole 0 Oliva Oil no change con be qUoted. rs l if t • 32s per cwt in bond. Cocoa Nut Oil qt l,- ' : ,o / 4 rt oP et ifa THE LATE FIRE IN BLACKPRIAiIItSe. leStlec The extent of damitee arising from i ll te e :a is il:t i b: ci lli e ee lf : ' :n tio fire at Messrs. Kindon and Bathe's floor —° o. 4 " - ] '' e tory, is estimated at 6,000/. The insurance t cl hj i 0)4 in' 1 18 .a 'a u s r, ( 1 ) i n a l i y n • g l. ) ,4 ia oo i l i . i a 'l pa b o e st fr d o a n n t wall s(%svtitilich and si've•Otrer; effectual attempts to throw it inwards we re re fit i % la , o ' l ', resided purpose o in f I ve li day. A scaffold was erected yeseerdel the 0 )1 : Lib ° ' ' n removing gto i n t. - is" in a st ste ''.- et le :, dering on insanity, and requiring conslent 4 e - „ e lse , maP fr oo vt,Y o g.ftl i PLATE.—T. COX SAVO - ~ e!liiii . - N t sG ui t in eN g ee,E S ha i u lv rs e e r hy s - m ost i or t e h Ne , t : oaTh.n4d7eF,bCoesoittrwrnKhsoillt L htt o 7F o i dt .,..i :b t L oe : bro re,ee• si j0.,.. 1 t4 pl T ac h e e , foreman of 4 toioce, following are the weights recommended, e u- „ a e t • • ;e i be had lighter or heavier at th rums price P er :, - : 11 ' I" ," ;1 '" , 1 5 1 12 Fiddle Pattern Silver Table Spoons ....... :34 t 7 ,- ' l 0 - 12 ditto he ditto 'table Forks ........ -.. .. ::45 '7 it. .• 5 1 1 12 ditto . . Dessert ditto... ..... .. .... 0 7 5 , 0 5 0 . 0 Dessert ditt0........... •••„. 2° 7 1:: ;ii 2 ditto Gravy Spoons ....... ... J . 7, i 5,... i a t I ditto Soup Lad1e........••••••"70) ' ...' $,, 4 ditto Sauce ditto.- ............... ...........› 3 k 0 4 ditto Salt Spoons (gilt streeer........x.**p... • I'd 1 ditto Fish Slice .... ..... - ••••••":111 i us t 12 ditto Tea Spoons .. ...................... 10- t li° 1 pair ditto Sugar Tongs ( strong ) ••••' y * err „ e t* 0 , N. B A Price Current, stamped its a Newl relan set t l e r by drawings, and containing every informatilaa A 0 of f purchase of silver or Sheffield plate P ohlmee, " ses2 tion, or will be sent into the country, ' fre e .. • to a paid letter. -.. On the 13th inst., at t R he IR II T e --- r il mi Sl 4 e, N t rt o h. ..,,iitti 4b. the Hon. Mrs. Sidey Roper Curzon , of 2 ........ 6 " - . vP . iz:o, ,ddro, On the 11th inst., at Oxford-strect, I , "'' Lx r of O a n w t n he 14th inst., at the Borough Ban-0 Esa., H on. Com tr S 01' teo r , eston - of a son. Aof S' O' On the 15th inst., at Euston-square, the la-1 o io an 's Service, of a son. /CO ~ Po / Tu n the 13th inst., at Reading , Berks, the WY ° • D ori Pnlan , R.N., of a daughter. tif q. , ---" On the 14th inst., the wife of T. BusbbY, circus, of a daughter. r St e (). t er MARRIED. Eerial4 ll On the 25th of September, S. Babille°°'6ot ar il. Bombay Civil Service, - to Arabella Sara, y° o° ' - Il e l i Ve e' of Colonel Barr. , J o sef) of On the 10th inst., at St. Luke's, Norwooo, , it , , gene, Esq., of Dominica, to Eleanor, d au ghter 01 to Jl e t , Esq., of Pin-grove, Norwood, Surrey. f Clifto ls t . f te r g i On the 11th inst., William Brown , E'cl'' o f daui" . o relict of theists Rev. R. H. Smith, and e ldest 40 9 11 Chapman, Esq., of John-street, Bedford-rovi.,, a ,to P On the 13t inst., at Dover, T. DIV . '!' . 't. daughter of the late Sir Benjamin Hobhouse, 13ar --------------' yors DIED. • 10 Ilia 're At Carnation Cottage, Niton, Isle of Wlgh t, OP Jane. the wife of Charles bloody, Esq• rth , tile 4, On the 12th inst., at Lavington lionse,.Petw_°, ag e , ' 31,1 of H. A. Bow ler, Esq., late 14th Light Vrago()_":ntoe, 000 On the 13t1; inst., ik Alexander.square• lioped E. Grant, widow of the late F. W. Grant, E ,1 1.9 O r t ,134 , square, Bloomsbury, aged 69.• uoge. On the 13th inst., at Camberwell, Eliza , 7 13 ° ,P ' f the late Commander Ineledon, It. N• f age d ' won' t.° ( On the 14th inst., at Old Dorset -place, OF O f'9' Farran, Esq., aged 72. ride ° At the Rectory, Bishopstone, Salisbury, Alfred, ipillt the late Hon. and Rev. T A. Harris. On the 13th inst., in Lan d o-rlitoo Bright°' °. 7 s own I of Esq. civil engineer, aged 31 .....'--- ' --,-- '; , • -:0 io ____ ___ _____.___.,__--s-_--.----- 0 yol'' pj London : Printed and Published by NCO. jo sir; 0 41‘ No. 112, Strand, at The Sun Otkice Dio• 1 e t 1 1 9 000 b the Comity of Middlieex, Woducodolf 0