The Sun. — London, England, 1819-10-09 00:00:00

coult-r cyv ALDEA,IEN. The 'Lord A.lnver lfelcl n Court of Aldermen yesterday, for the purpoie of receiving the repot t of the Sheriffs of the Aldermen nominated to -serve the ofticemfLorl Mayor for the rear ensit• ing, at which were -present—Sir Curtis, Eaater, Sir James Shf4W, Sir WiNam Leighton, Sir Chories . Flower, Alderman 305111 . 13 U. Smith, 'George Seholey, Samuel Birch, Sir Matthew li:oxham. Christopher Magnay, Ge , rge Bridges, William 1-11q 4 :Hte, Robert A Cox, John Thomas Thorp, Robert Waithman, and Mr. AI •--derman and Sheriff nothwell. The Sheriffs, attended by the 'Common Ser j.•ant, presented the names of Mr. Alderman Bridges and Mr. Alderman Thorp, as the two Verson,. nott►inated by, the - Livery for the choice of that Court, to serve the office of Lord Mayor for the year ensiling ; ‘vherenicon the Court elected Mr. Alderman Brid4es, and I►roccetlett tt, the Gni!dhall, to make known the same to the Livery in Common 1-1411. The Lord Mayor, on his return to the Court of Aldermen, Wis attended by all the memb,rs ahnvc-named, with the exception of Sir J. Shaw,. who left the Court on the di,solution'of the Cont-' mon Hall. • There being no other -business upon the sum mons but tLe'election ot a ',old :nayor, some Of the Aldermen who lvere not in' the secret, were preparing t ) &part, when the Lord Mayor said he had some business of important;e to lay helore the •Court. The members accordingly took their seats. MOT IN GrILDIIALL ON Tt ELECTION OF LORD MAYOR. The LORD MAYOR then said, the business to wbich he had to call the -attention of the Court was of the mos , serious and important nature, — The Common Serjeant had reported to him, that the proceedings in the Comoro!) Hail, on Nlichael mas -day, for the election of a Lord Mayor, hail been obstructed by noise and tumult ; ihaf not withstandlog the e..3ommon Serjeant had warned the Livcry there assembled, that they most pro ceed to the election, they had refused so to do ; that great tumult had taken place, and instead of proceeding to the election, as. they were hound to do, certain individuals insisted upon mowing se veral liesolnticos, which were so moved and passed before the election was proceeded upon.— These proceedings he considered so extraordinary and improper, that he had felt it his duty to lay a statement of the same before the Court, in order that they might adopt such measures thereon as they might think necessary. Sir Wm. CURTIS said, he was not present at the Common 1-Tall upon the occasion mentioned ; he bail, however, read some account of the proceed ings which had taken place on that day, and thought them highly "iroproper ; he• therefore re quested that the Sheriffs would state to the Court what had actually taken place. Mr. Sheriff PARR INS was called in accordingly, and on the request being formally made by the Lord Mayor, Mr. Sheriff ROTHSVELL said, that fire proceedings of that day had been so extraor dinary, and so unexpecte d on his part, that he b,id, for the purpose of refreshing his memory, written a statement of what had occurred. He then proceeded to read a long written statement, in which the mevting was described as exceeding ly noisy and tumultuous ; that Mr. "l'hor»psOn and Mr. Fearon came forward to•mOve certain resdlu lions ; that on ,his objecting to such d 'protert log, and insisting that time Livery must go to the election, Mr. Alderman Waithman Caine for want to support them, and said, ".No, no." endeavours to proceed to the election - were inef fectual ; and notwithstanding he protested against it, certain resolutions were moved, and carried, previously to proceeding on the election of a Lord Alayor. Mr. Sheriff PARKINS said, lie thought it most extraordinary that he should be thus called upon, without any previous notice whatever, to enter into a long detail of the circumstances which bad taken plate ; he.did not know who the Common Serjeant was ; he had gone to the Hall without having taken any legal advice, and did not expect to be called upon to account for,his conduct when be was wholly unprepared ; he allowed there was a great deal of noise ansl pi ensure ; lie felt he had done his duty ; he thought the Livery bad the right to discuss their grievances when legally assembled in Common Hall. lie re peated, he was wholly unprepared and taken by surprise ; but he was able and willing to justify every part of his conduct, and would,' if they thought fit, draw out his statement of what had occurred. Sir WILLIAM CURTIS then requested that the Common-Sedeant should be desired to state to the Court his account of what took place. Mr. COMMON-SERPEANT, thus called upon, en .tcred into a long statement of the occurrences which took place, and which differed in 'lolling material from that of the worthy Sheriftßothwell, before alluded to. On his stating that he had warnad the Sheriffs that they ought and must pro ceed to the election,. lie was replied to somewhat Hastily by Mr. Sheriff Parkins, who declared that he had received no such warning ; he would, how ever, prepare a statement of they latts as they ap peared to him. The presence of Mr. Sheriff Parkins being no longer required, he was here desired to withdraw, which he did accordiugly. The RecottnEx and COMMON SeRnANT Were then called upon for their opinions upon the cir cumstances, as related to-the Court. Mr. Alderman WAITIIMAN rose to order. He objected to the law-officers being called upon to give any opinion until the facts were fairly before the Court. His Lordship had tailed the Court, after pil,vious consultation rvith.the • law-officers, and had charged him and one of the Sheriffs, and other individuals, with hav;ng conducted them-' _selves illegally and improperly ; he had come to. the meeting with a long and studiously prepared st'atement ; Mr. Sheriff Rothwell was also pre pared with his statement ; and all this without the feast previottis•notice to the parties accused, or to. the members of the Court, except those who bad been secretly apprised.. Tie Common- Serjeant, be asscrted,had - exceeded his duty; he wis the mere montliplece of the Sberiff,l, a n t ! !tact ei a 7111- thority to'pot anyiltrestimi evithotWth6r`dieectini. The Loan MAyoekerec,alledflie worth.y.Alder i man rn order, whoaeccordingly sat-,down;..atid hi• L,,,,a,hipthen desired the Common SA:tit:ant to state his opinion. • . The CommoN SEHJEANT, after some - preface, stated it as his opinion, that the Common 'Hall was called for the express , purpose of electing a Lord Mayor, and that they had no right 'to pro ceed um, any other business whatever.; that to obstruct the election, or to go into other mat ' tern, was an offeuce at common law, and . 8150 again,t the statute authorizing elections by the Common Hall ; that the Livery . were bound by their oath to proceed on the Election ; and that if the sauce could he atijouyned or delayed two hoUrs, ' it might be delayed till 12 o'clock at night. He considered, therefore, that the Livery bad no power or right to adjourn the proceedings while they were discussing other matters, but must go at once to the Election. . . Mr. Recoanen coneurred in opinion with the Learned Serjeaot, and delivered himself to the same effect. It was quite clear. he said, that - the Livery cotil',' proceed to on ottir business, and quoted the case of Mr. Aldernian Nowise, as corn elusive that they had no right itecommon-liall,lo proceed on airy business but the EleCiion" for the 'lmpose of which ihey•were called together. Sir Wm. CUNT'S then saint, that as be way not present, he knew nothing of the procecilings at the Common-hall ; but from all he bad previously Gard aml read, and from statements that day 11171je to the Court, he was Convinced that great riot and tumult had taken place ; the conduct pur sued there was most irritating and insulting; what, he would ask, toth! he more insulting than attacking the character of a. respectable officer by - the opprobribus epithet of " Little Jefi" He thought the refusal to proceed, and the obstruc t lion offered to the election, a gross outrage and highly nuconstitutional: the Court ought to sup. port its own dignity, and prosecute the of fenders. The worthy Baronet then pulled out o f hi s pocket a paper, which he read as a motion ; the substance of which was, that the whole business be referred to a Committee of Aldermen, with in structions to prosecute the offenders, and (9 re port their proceedings from time to time to the Court of Aldermen. . Mr. Alderman Cox rose to second the motion of the worthy Baronet, but thought the ,Court ought first to inquire how they proceedings on former occasions had got before the public. The worthy Alderman - was proceeding,' in his very best manner, ro animadvert upon this daring vio- • lation of privilege, when he was interrupted by the Lord Mayor, who said that business was not now before the Court : the Alderman then sat down, contenting himself with secondiug the t motion. Mr: Alderman WAITIIMAN ntlw rose, and in a speech of upwards of an hour vongly contended against the impropriety of agreeing to such a proposition. tie said the present was in his judgment the most extraordinary proceeding iie had ever witnessed in that Court. There was a charge already brought forward by' the Lord Mayor against him, which was still undecided upon, and had been hanging over his head for Several weeks, and 'which that Court had not as yet' ventured to go iota. 'And although they had not yet disposed of a question' *bleb .wai said to be an attack on the privileges 'of•the Court; and derogatory to the dignity of the• Chief gistte;'they' again erected themselves' into a Sort'of Star Chaibber to discnss and decide upon'the rights anther bpdies. There never was kbasinOti brought forward in 'any Court, in which there Was so ncirch art, trickery, and unfairness, as the present here''wes a Motion to instruct the law officers to institute Frocerdings against individuals who had not the, slightest intimation of such tent ion, without any inquiry or.eiaminatiOn into the facts, upon the _mere ex-parte statements of the Common Serjeant and one of the .Sheriffi, without even a tittle of evidence.. lie, who was one of the party accused, was charged befor'e private Court, where much political prejudice ex .fisted, and where 22 out of 26 members were 'de cidedly hostile to his opinions. By singular .ae cident (for trickery as well as murder would' out), he had learned that the Lord Mayor, the Recorder, Common Serjeant, and other o.fiicers,lidd been eon suPing together, searching records,exatukting pre cedents, and preparing, the • whole 'machinery Of this charge . ; and that he was to be taken by. sur prise, and left without defence, as far as related to their intentions. Even the Court itself was left without any notice, except such as had been Corn municated privately. I.lc, however, alwayrs f e lt his courage increased with the difficnities he liad to contend with, and was not afraid to meet them there ; or if they chose, in the present irritated state of public feeling, to cuter into a warfare ivith the rights of their fellow citizens, he was not to be dismayed, but would be proud to be the object selected to defend them. However highly he might think of the Recorder and Cotnmon Serjeant as lawyers, they must excuse him fur not thinking them extraordinarily gifted with a knowledge of constitutional law, espeCially when he found so many precedents, so many great.opinions opposed to theirs. He then proceeded , to vindicate tlie rights and powers of the Common Hall, as the great cor- porate botly,attd instancedan occurrence in the time of Charles 1., when the Court of Common Council sent their petition to the King at Ox.tord, who would send his answer outs* to the Common hail, as the greater assembly, adding as a reason, "that he would have all fair and above board." Ile next alluded to the memorable case of Jenks, which, he said, was precisely similar to the pre sent, with just this difference—that the Common- Serjeant of that day did not report his account to the Court of Aldermen, ,but to the . Privy Coun cil ; and even in that arbitrary reign it was -,al r.wed that Jenks had committed 119 offence, and hey darid not bring bin* to trial. The, worthy Alderman then proceeded to notice the case of the Sheriffs l'ilkington, and chir e, and others, in order to shots', tharalthough charged and convict- ed of riot in continuing the ,ppil after the . Lord Mayor had adjourned ihe it.heing contended that the right to adjourn the' proveedingsivas in the Lord Mayor and Common-serjeant, all, the proceedings had .since been reversed and declared illegit, and thereby the evidence given by Mr. nr:(1 Sit 11„beiVAS,7 1 011 ect:111j;11( - 11 as cot-- rt cr. For tbongh-Sir Gone Jeinisys liad said, Viet the e,lPoron Was k;.ith Contrnon Svr;ea . nt, and that I hi;sl,,,:itr,.. - ;,.A e.d on, the'fall was ►lreri, 'as' it is nOw, that the Sheriffs alone had the conducting of the elections. Sir Francis Vin nington, counsel for Vilkingtoo, had 'asked Mr. Love, who Was a witness .‘• What is the °dice of CoMmon Serjeant ? for there are' some htte 'who say, he and the Common Crier have the whole power in ordering'electians in the Common Hall," The answer of Mr. Love was worthy of record : " Truly, Sir, said be, i look upon both as per sons lift to assist us, and save us the trouble of saying, O yes, ontselVei -; and if either of them thirst put a question without my direction, I Tvould have shown him whether he 'could, or no." Thus the right to address the Livery was acknow ledged before the Revolution, and subsequently confirmed by the act - restoring the City Charters. What, then, is the Common Serjeant ? He is not mentioned in any of your Charters, and is the mere mouthpiece of the Sheriffs; 'and can do no thing without their direction. . The worthy Aldetman then desired that the opinion delivered by Serjeant Glyn, in• 1773, de claring it to ;be the undoubted right of the Livery in Common Hall to discuss public matters, on Michaeltnas or Midsummer-days ; and also that of Recorder Glyn, :and . 's'erjearit Ntigcnt, in 1779, confirmiNg that right, should be•iead, which was done aCcOrdingly.. He "then instanced neatly 20 cases of precedents from 1769 down to 1809, and dwelt With great forCe upon that of Alderman Turner. Ile next teniarked on the circumstance of a vote of thanks, passed - to Alderman Conibe, in his Mayoralty, and before au election, for his con duct in suppressing some riots that had occurred ; and conceived, if it were legal to vote thanks, there could be no - legal objeCtion to a vote of censure, if deserved. Even cases had occurred in which business had been brought - forward before an election, bit the Lord Mayors themselves ;and if, as the Com mon Serjeant had urged, the Livery were booed by the precept issued; the Lord Mayor was equally bound by his own precept. Rut the Common Serjeant had said, it you can deky the'election an hour, you may delay it tili midnight ; so then these pro secutions are not for breach of law—not for what we did, but for what we might have done ; just upon the Same principle as the murders at Mali chester, where the victims were sacrificed because mischief' might- have ensued from their assem bling together ; 'and the Court - of -Aldermen— a close - conclave---a secret tribunal, were to sit in judgnrent on the rights of their tellow-citizens, and be was to be taken when tlrty thought him defenceless, and when he might have been incapable of 'advocating the' rights or the Livery. Well, indeed, might they feel themselves in a state of alarm and trepidation, fearful their proceedings should meet the public eye, knowing they would not bear the public Scrutiny; lie . was Well - aware . that any vote Of censure they could pass' against him would . only raise 'him in public estimation, and he more serviceable to him than their thanks; but he would neverilieleis be always really to de fend himself against' 'any `secret or coutrited attack. ir.sym. CURTIS here disclaimed having attend ed any meeting on the subject. " my LOrd;" exclaimed Mr. Warta " li am'not' ti) be . decei'ved . 'by such a con', MAN, trivance. I know the worthy Baronet Was - hot there; I know be did not steal the leg of mutton, but he bad it under hi 4 cnat; and has now pro duced.it cut. and dried. I know as well as your tOillihip what passed at the'Meeting I have allud ed. to." 'Aeverting again to 'the quesfion' - Of right, he contended, that the l'aw-otheers had not - adduced a r 'single precedent or authority zn sairport of the doctrine laid' dOwii, and ridi4uled Witli'Much success the infroduCtron of the case of Altle'rnian Pinnate, Mentioned 'by the Recorder, Which — had no bearing at all upon the'cia'ti.4'tiOn, And only ShoWecl to - what a . dileMnia' he been i~tiven. With 'respect tip the'clectiOn - ot" MaA:or,. he had nothing to do with had ittk . 4e'd his friend s not to attempt to oppose the rot a;ihri; 'he "feit'it lri;'ditty - tti support the'liglits Of the Livery, and if any 'aCt' . Of tumult or assault was committed, it ,wai'ou the part of the officeis', who, he iltinbted not, had :the Lord Mayor's 'orders ; and it isr'ttS . not till he witnessed an act of violence committed 'by one - of; the City Marshals On Mr: Thompson that he came for ward' to support him. The Worthy Mdennan concluded by s'ayingi, that hebarlevery respect for the Aldertnen personally, and had always lived on good terms with them, and still wished so to do ; but lie could never COO sent to compromise the rights - Of his fell'ow'-chi- tens, of be backward to deletid them on all oc casions. Alderman J. J. SMITH deprecated the proceed ing intended to be adopted ; there was : ito evidence of the facts before them ; the party were (Hilo formed and unprepared, and even the Court were taken: by Surprise, at no mention of the subject was made on the tutnirint. x\hlerman 13111 CH ObjeCted to the motion with out some previous inquiry ; hut as the Atli hority of the law-offiCerS was called in questiou, be would vote . for inquiry on the subject. Sir WILLIAM Ctnrists said, what the Wrote two hours ago might not be ali right ; be would there _ . fore witiulrais:his motion, tied propose one in a dif ferent form. The motion tiffis then withdris,:vn, . . • Sir \I'M. Curtils moved that it he referred to the Committee of Privileges to i-Oquire into the nature of the offence, and whether any and what proceedings should be instituted against the per sons concerned in 'causing thee - tuninit on Michael rnas7ffay, taking the advice.of the Law Officers if necessary, and repOrt thereon. Alderman Tttofu' opposed the ;notion, on the ground tha't no facts were in evidence, and tbar the motion stated the exiSience of thinulf, when there was -no proof of any tumult belur e the ,Court. Alderman C. SMITH did not exactly like the motion, ,bot ,he was never against inquiry where . . agyotlence was alleged. TheiOntioti *was 't hen carried: „Alderman Bai;n6as %'yrslie'd 'it to be referred to the L'ai . v Officer's Mien he ought to . Call'ComitioO Sir 1,101. WILL/VW CURTIS replied, that must rest with.hililsrlf Alder Man VVAITUMAN observed, it would be just as prnper as if the Lord Mayor were to cats Commoujiall to ought to sup' 111011 • A ' C(Mee ' t , f'Atiteren'6n.. • The Ltatin MAvon 'said,. he had another-serious business to lay before the,Court, . respecting, th.q conduct of Mr. Sheriff ;Parkins, who was accort!.: ingly called in, when tiii'Lbrftship read a •torig staternenrof different acts of - neglect oit thepet of the,Sherlff- 7 in not attending the processjoos,i4 his state coach, coming to be sworn at the Gpi'l4.l hall; not joining the procession to WestrninitCe, but Meeting him there, and (hen neglecting torn in the procession; and several other acts..o( similar importance. 111 r. Sheriff NRKz.Szs said, be was taken by sot': prise, but could' satisfactorily defend every part of his conduct, if he were allowed time to prepare his defence. Time was then allowed him till the next Court, (Tuesday.) Mr. Alderman WArrumAtt said, if they were to inspire into complaints of this sort, the Sheriff ought to have a copy of the accusation, which • was agreed to; Sir Wm. CURTIS gave notice that he should move, at the next Coot t, a, Loyal Dechiration, ;0 1 tn.sigorti by the members.—Aqjoirocti. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HOUSE. ATTACk tato:sr -MR. SAMUEL•DixoN.—Yestrr•%, day a young man of respectable appearance, named Knapp,' Who is emplOVe'd in a mercantile house of character, was brought. before ihe Lo i stp MATort by Uadbetter, the marshalioan,• UpOra a warrant eharging him with having assaulted Mi . , Samuel Dixon. . Mr. Dixon said, he had been at the election fat Lord Mayor at Guildhall on Wedn'eSday*; at tli close of the proceedings, at about foot:o'clock: be made his way as well as he could throagh.thp crowd from the Hall, anti seas, cm passing i n to Guildhalkyark shOtited at by . the multitude, wheo uttered words insinuating that he iiiid - set the cif on fire, and committed' murder. There was also a cry of " Here comes Dixon ; here comes old Sammy." His son met him at the entrance to the- Hall, and both proceeded trout the spot, en deavouring to force their‘way through a crowd ne. many hundred persons. They laboured for a con siderable time to get through the multitude, w i t ., yelled and roared abuse against him. Mr. Digats was unable to swear to the person of the pria. oner. In answer to a question from theord Mayora Mr. Dixon said he certainly considered his life it), dancer at the time of the attack. Mr. J. W. Dixon confirtned the account give!, by the first witness, who is his father. Mr. Stafford, a young man of respectability, said, that upon crossing the Southwark-bride ate Wednesday last; on his way to Gal Mali, he eat' , an imittense mob at the bottom of Qtteen-street• Mr. D took refuge in the shop of Mr. Shroa. tier, and immediately afterwards he saw the pli- -, sorer stoop down; take up a handful of mud, a nti throw it towartis the door of the house. ~ -i - The prisoner "said he was iittiocen' o( oriiiiic.. • tension to insult Mr. Dixon. it :Was trise).evitis in the mob, but 'he was....arjually,earried.,.:roto,it by theirtesistibl . 7 **44e..;:',eikkittittfitude. while he was pursuit] : --a - Aew;;,y with a h.f ter ft.fri , his employers'. . tterCantile house in:the neigh.; ii i tt bourhood of Queen street. On arriving at Cola lege-hill, he was beady lviocked down, aittl+ is hat was throw n in the mod. He stooped to pi,;:k oti the hat, and, finding thtt it .bad gathered a (pats. tit y or mad: r -angeily %] iped it off, anti flurg• ii among the mob, vying:out, " There, take:that; the whole pack of you." , The LORD ' MAYOR said, that the defendant must prove those things to the satisfaction 'of * Jury. Things hid .now reaelied such a - etisi.; that the Chief Magistrate of the City, o r am' other person holding opinions opposed to those Of a deluded Multitude, •or a savage and lawlesit mob, could not peel - win his duty-in public, or proceed along the - sit errs, without being' insulted, and running the hazard of something like assts.. ' aFtnolun.. .'His Lordship then bound over the ..it:- fend - ant to answee.tor the offence at the Quartet* Sessions ; himself in the Sum of 401. anti . twit sureties in 201. etch. HATTON-GARDEN. ' CAUTION TO PLII/ONS SELLING TABLE BRER•"'" Yesterday not less than fifteen persons, who] keep chandlers' shops in-the neighboitithooll of Edge' ware and Northend, appeared - to suintnonses oil informations, charged with sellingt tble. beer at 4 higher price than two-pence per quart, not hiving ti licence.. It appeared that no person is allowed to s ell beer from malt and hops at a greater'prieu (144 two-pence a quart, without a regular licence, under a penalty not exceeding Ely pout - ors, nor less than twenty shillings. The eleven first wht, attended, pleaded ignot ant of such an Act o f Par liament being in existence, and stated that the beer cost thernsevet two-pence a (part, awl that they sold it for the convenience 61' the nrighbcurm hood at two•pence halfpenny a quart, beitig a halfpenny a quart profit. They all pleaded guilty, and threw themselves on the mercy of Of* Magistrates. They were severally convicted 'in the penalty of twenty shillings. The cases of four other persons stand over till another day. ' ' 11111:1'11S. We have the satisfaction to state, th:tt on Sunday morninP her ENcellency the Countess of Talbot was saltily delivercl of son,- - --Waldin Et ening Post.) On Sat ar.lav List, at Portsmouth, the Lsdy of Major D' ton, 99th Light Infantry, uf,a sun. 51 AMU El). On 'lrhursday last, at Walcot Church, Bath, Henry M rireivs Drummond, Esq.. (Consnianifer of thr !al (.:oinpany's ship tastle,Hunily) to Maria, only daughter vi tltr capt. James Tin - qua:id, it. N. , On Wednesday last, in , the 31th year of her age, Elizabal l f eldest d,fogliter of Ore Rey. Dr. M•Leod, hector o f St. Anne " ‘Vestwinister. hod, on the 30th of August last, in the ,i year of his age, his grandson, Roderich Macleod. Oni Thursday last, ib"Westinnin9trr,'Nlr..lahlt Raynor, ag ea 59, nrany years Ventilator' it the House of Commons. LONDON: 'Printed lry CARSTAIRS, of Nu. 29, Treat Ortuntid-strect, Queen-square; and. published hY , s t:IalPl . )S, of No: 7, South 111(0ton-street, at TiE OiEee. No. 112, Strand ; when: Adruithementi, (.1 1 d ej ! Z l / 4 t. (post-paid; must be 3.ldrussfut. ~. r~ J To INHA Sa I.F Feel tQ~Cu~~ sled fa: Son an Suppo Plac liCnate t/vr are sli ni est ' . ?able ~'~~~der Ilaritc 'tor t !! ( 1 1 . )t tary d Nil kb Ivisrst It is feel:ug duct, laired , li►lize tvli n tee n t p osi 1 4irui v , regard t at „.d retuus 'C~o[atr 1 1441 to 44der 'r. That ° f their knit of lave it; ~2~! r,! Per s ,d fin '• .i itts ptr , Li th lion s I , lion, 1 [lire. t 1 ect try foi those ftere s t_i 8 Y ti tiirges rieciat sacr e d "d lip ~ti►ts d it i Lost di that w t (he ws froi n , v 1 " dear .Aka, tteiil aii la C-Grui Ayltilst k entiw i Vidal / tur tilt Doug die,etui +lutl~ nr Noth ai,g u~, b een rt Od in than t NVeer, ikons Ove r) ; ' %hal % Ph t LI( kg Mitt yl, O ft of ETli Livii J *action! 4Cettrat, be little 'lee n mi turtilida bt 'th e 1 Of the t I) "littiht '*t'ich _ t 1( yt tlaust lit „,, t4''Vr