The Sun. — London, England, 1828-05-10 00:00:00

- *• owAi ,--~ e -7/ ADMIRALTY-OFFICE, May 1, 18..i5. WIDOWS' PENSIONS. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Widows of Commission and Warrant Officers of the Royal Navy, receiving Pensions from the Charity eats hlished for their Relief will be paid their Pensions due the Slat of March last, at No. 10, New-square, Lincoln's-Inn, bY" Edward Finch Hatton, Esq., the Paymaster of the Charity, v i z. The Widows of Flag Officers, Superannuated Rear Ad mirals, Captains, Commanders, Lieutenants and Masters, onSatu r d ay t h e 10th instant ; t h e Wid ows o f Phy s i c i ans , s Monday Assistant Surgeons, Pursers, and Boatswains , on — ,-""Y• the 12th instant; and the Widows of Gunnersand Carpenters on Tuesday the 13th inst. ; and on every suc ceeding Thursday between the hours of Ten and Twelve. And uotice is further given, that Remittance Bills will he " at n tl the 10th inst., to those Widows resident in the Country, who have requested to be paid their Pensions jae " t heirrespective Residences. J. W. CROKER. Ia rAtered Outwards, for NEW SOUTH WALES, Direct, Fine Coppered Ship HARRIET, „ 11- 1 1 E . 1. JOHN KNAGGS, Commander. Burthen 40 Tons. Lying in the London Dock. This Ship has Tiers superior accommodations for Cabin and Steerage "lCogers. For Freight or Paesage apply to BUCKLES, BAGSTER, and BUCHANAN, 33, Mark-lane. ROYAL ACADEMY, SOMERSET-HOUSE. HE EXHIBITION of the ROYAL ACADEMY is NOW OPEN. Cifrom Eight o'clock till Seven) One Shilling. 444( tue One Shilling. HENRY HOWARD, R.A., Sec. THE FALL OF NINEVEH. Tins DAY IS OPENED; MR. MAR „ TIN'S EXHIBITION of the above PAINTING, the WESTERN EXCHANGE, OLD BOND .°TkEET. Admission One Shilling—Catalogue One Shilling. Open from Nino till Five o'clock. THE CROWN CLUB. THE ORIGINAL MEMBERS are re quired forthwith to PAY their SUBSCRIPTIONS 4 'the hands of the Tteasurers, Messrs. Cockburn and Co., te hall, in the names of Rowland Stephenson, Esq., ton ' Samuel Crompton, Esq., M.P., and C. A. Trnstees. p t 'e Club H ouse , th e mansion lately occupied by the fe the Cou nc il, 12, Whitehall-place, will be completed in %Le,: d ays, and Apartments, Billiard-rooms, Eie. will in e er C e a 4 time be open for the Members who have obtained e l ,: e ates from the Treasurers. 41 raunications in future to be addressed to the Com of the Club House. BLEMEN, GENTLEMEN, and foN, AGRICULTURISTS in general are respectfully in k:4 that BENJAMIN EDGINGTON has now pre \le,C,rt,a.,.._Pt hi s manu f ac t or y, Z"), TOOLEY-STREET, N ' ttROOF RICK CLOTHS, made in a superior der, with Poles complete, at very moderate expence. tatlemen in want of the above most useful articles this A,q h la are solicited to favour him with their early orders. 1 1 , 17., (4 1TEES and TENTS to any size or pattern, NET 7y*, aud BUNTING for Fruit Trees; Sacks, Ropes, P itch, Tar, &c. k i r'a by Post duly attended to. Address full length, I .p 4 AMIN EDGINGTON. 5, TOOLEY-STREET, li DON.letlilt • Second-hand Rick Cloths, Marquees, and Tents hire. ARTIFICIAL TEETH. R. WARREN, Surgical and Mechanical tip bentist, N. 7, Leicester-square, invites the atten- LI , 4t" the Nobility and Gentry to his unerring principle NP,,?lying all deficiencies of the Mouth, either of the 'li 44 'R. GUMS, or PALATES, arranged in Gold, tt, t ,sli or Sea-horse substances, front a single tooth to a t h,rtt set, on fair and equitable terms : and he more ts. t llla sly solicits the consideration of such eases as may 4 u tella deemed difficult by others of the Profession. C's 4ti. r * WARREN respectfully assures those Ladies and kt ik ;' 4 len who may anticipate pain or unsightly appear- S t. ° l gold, &c. that his system of Adaptation is wholly 'led by such objections ; and that in most cases, a h 4 ,N,„" will suffice for replacing th ose useful and orria ,74 ~.sulAtitutes Sc) necessary to the comf ort o f articola -4 1 4 47 assistance of mastication, and t he restorati on o f 4 r uorm i t y of the mouth. M r . continues to Lecture on Dental Surgery, ern , ! Cleansing, Stopping, Excising, and Extractin g , Nom, 'eluding the Manufacturing Department , a s now P.,,, - .sed, h ..ims by the most eminent Dentists in London and ... C . , Leicester -square. --- WOODVILLE SEGARS. r o p y) 4 VING appointed Mr. .1. D. NIEMANN kt .t el London, my sole .AGENT in England, for the SEGARS of my Manufactory, I beg to assure ofa► it trb o ma y b ecome Pmchasers at hi s W are h ouse , '' l l be my constant endeavour to supply none but ~ho4%;VerY best quality ; and trust that these Segars will in England the same high reputation for which th e Ii:„1„Ni °Y e so long been distinguished in every other part of Ai r ntI:,,,"IENIANN h a s entered into an engagement to sell "ncis dc than the WOODVILLE SEGARS, supplied to t° from my Manufactory, which will be a guarantee artio:!'"a favor bins with their orders, that they obtain the Ilav 4441 b, Oct. 13, 1826. In c o (Signed) MARINA WOODVILLE. ` ate, t s equence o f t h e a b ove appo i ntment , I b eg l eave to }t egent: I hav e o p ene d a W are h ouse , a t Rio. 221, tiV e sa4reeti the corner of Maddox-street, for the exclu- O rde E of the 'WOODVILLE SEGARS. h e r ,' address e d as a b ove , w h ere samp l es may b e seen , ll N' 4l Y attended to. 13 . A liberal Discount allowed to the Trade. J. D. NIEMANN. FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZETTE. At the Court at St. James's, the 7th day of May, 189.8, PRESENT, The KING'S Most Excellent Majesty in Council. Whereas the time limited by his Majesty's Order in Coun cil, of the 18th October last, for prohibiting the exportation of gunpowder, saltpetre, or any sort of arms or ammunition, to any port or place on the Coast of Africa (except to any port or places within the Streights of Gibraltar), will expire on the twenty-third day of this instant M a y ; and whereas it is judged expedient that the said prohibition should be continued for some time longer ; his Majesty, by and with the advice of his Privy Council, doth thereforehereby order, require, and command, that no person or persons whatever (except the Master- General of the Ordnance for his Majesty's Service) do, at an y time during the space of six months (to commence from the twenty-third of this instant May), presume to transport any gunpowder or saltpetre, or any curt of arms or ammunition, to any port or place on the Coast of Africa (except to any ports or places within the. Streights of Gibraltar) or ship or lade any gun powder or saltpetre, or any sort of arms or ammunition, on board any ship or vessel, for the transporting of the same into any such ports or places on the coast of Africa (except as above excepted), without leave or permission in that be half first obtained from his Majesty or his Privy Council, upon pain of incurring and suffering the respective forfei tures and penalties- imposed in that belief by an Act, passed in the sixth year of his present Majesty's reign, in tituled " An Act for the general regulation of the Customs :" And the Right Hon. the Lords Commissioners of his Majesty's Treasury, his Royal Highness the Lord High Ad miral, the Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports, the Master- General and the rest of the Principal Officers of the Ord nance, and his Majesty's Secretary at War, are to give the necessary directions herein as to them may respectively ap pertain. JAS. BULLER. Erratum, in the Gazette of Tuesday last, p. 573. Under the head of Circuits of the Commissioners for relief of Insolvent Debtors, Southern Circuit, for nm mouthshire, at Bristol, read, at Bristol only. )AY.) X all d been lag u . tbs t maintain y than 011 1; lay. Therf o t 71 obtain r dull in 416 ;re. 6,50 0 -.., ___ := , ......... 0 CISH COg r ?4 ,:rog •om the me E;10311 , wn.‘ in 2* 213 4 . f+i• ns DI, ie ; . e of the hating e%l' Ld the b 0 .01 d of prioe ;1 inferior 4 11$ day's price * oFrittb r. d. tot p 00 ; 3 ' 5 4 , Ives 4 Si v 5 4 4 P, S 9 3 4 co .. 12s t o 356. c r, ISs to 245. 0 ENT. I Y 1 r 0 Ligh priet # i RKETI 5 .....4 0 A i 4 4 " E W s. 25 21 34 0 I 30 42 ,0 25 42 23 913 Ml IS 34 24 33 4 JI 29 42 0 40 41 25 21 25 ‘; 20 40 v i) 32 34 ,y) MAY . 11 tleseriptw" lull. Wheal' 959. ; 15 12 . 14 rial qua.r o _, r; 39. 9d. 1 . 4U. to 4:21. far fd. an sd. to 04 ' id. A 105 _, e 10v. r Fig at Ne° rather aloci . May of tl' e Tramp° l l Cadland av :ablef, Pio /. when blo twmarket,"" o ugh Rob 19 ' Pd at Nell' le filly I winner of ETJNG. • • • ...... yrs ...... v, est. R 93. T.111.1v 1 . yr 4 2 ~. 2 50T9. ead J ' stanm ; the s ........ 4 y-2 to 1 to 1 at4 , C ier a severe ;ULM Cou" tcb, for a ,, tm __6 to st Tatler---• orporat ion. ~ 1 1 . 3 dr 4 dr Races, W u, Eq. for battle, awl Houghton• .31. B . . 3 1 . 4 1 . 4 0 dembets Dw up the even more yachts are and it . be"callud) etertnine ,l ADMIRAL lasetimin old gen• ken oT)ser 1c that one summer , Lan in anY OFFICE ~~-~ rco /fie u •,,,"/ •,_, "'"" . • ,4"h&n,AT — '-A.. ~.. ) ' ... 1- ‘ I 'el ' " '1- . "7 , & • ' .. -,, •-I 4, l A' .L.:.,' % -2 *—. *' i -',,,-- -- „„, ,• ,), (__.7....5.,...,:__ t , . un , 7, .; (/ • , :: - ,!.:••ri ,:. , • 1 1 .• ..f .. " ,/ .. '1 ' '• ‘ •it,..' l'. •/44. Pi .0 ' 1"' S' .. 'l`• 4 , ' . 1 , "ce , .../ . •- C") X . -4,, , ' '''..,,;, 1 :: 4--.:.: " .. . \ / .• ..."` ti- , 171 li ht,u : _,,_,-,., , •, Iz . ‘ -'O , ~,/..,,,,,, 0 - ' ,I,J, •••• • - ..1 ~, i , i+ • .i ; 4 , ' , ', ~\." ‘\ - 4,6 7 ,, , ~6, ~, ' . . 1 .-- ' '`---- - .:4 i '''' '''' ' ' ' ''7---;- •- '- -" j il ' •••,,,,,.... ~, • . .4: ‘ .. , ' ,., .....,V . . ,5. n• ~., • ' V lek I, -- 1-‘ • -1,- (f, , . - 04. k r! ^o _44, - igri - 5,.. i% • , " ' ---', 'bit A ., „ . 01111:" • 44 ' , ,* , zr, t k ,.. , , -, - ~, ~ , i - 4 , . i• ..,,. • .T 4 .1.2, -riti ~,,_'* •• • -,,, 'V Itgar...xey _ 07,,,t1,1 IT N J. •...- / ..,Dm., ir-rridik 11,1 , . ,10 1* e . :"' ' _if ,Th „..glet'',‘: • Lemgc••• No. 11,128. BANKRUPTS. William Masson, Queen .street, Cheapside, merchant, to surrender May 16, 20, and June 20, at ten, at the Court of Commissioner , . Kirkman and Rutherford, Cannon street. Charles Fletcher Bullivant, Ripley, Derbyshire, May 13, 14-, and June 20, at eleven, at the King's-Head, Duffield. James, Charlotte-row, Mansion-house, London. William Thomas Roper, jun., Houndsditch, carpenter, May 23, June 3, and 20, at ten, at the Court of Commis sioners. Crank, Union-court, Broad-street. James Powell, Bishopsgate-street, grocer, May 20, June 3, at eleven, and 20, at ten, at the Court of Corn mi,sioners. Brough, Shoreditch. William Henry Briant, Oliver-terrace, Mile-end-road, coal.merchant, May 23, at ten, June 3, at eleven, and 20, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Eicke, Old Broad street. Isaac Parsey, Brighton, hosier, May 13, at one, 27, at twelve, and June 20, at one, at the Court of Commis sioners. Jay and Co., Sergeant's-inn. Joseph Brown, Adam's-court, Broad-street, auctioneer, May 20, at nine, 23, and June 20, at nine, at the Court of Commissioners. Towne, Crown-court, Threadneedle street. James Nicholls, Kidderminster, innkeeper, May 28, 29, and June 20, at eleven, at the George Inn and Commer cial Hotel, Ledbury. Clarke, Richards, and Medealfe, Chancery-lane ; Higgins, Ledbury, Worcestershire. John Wilson, Wigton, Cumberland, draper, May 26, 27, and June 20, at eleven, at the Crown and Mitre Inn, Carlisle. Mounsey and Gray, Staple-Inn; Ewart, Carlisle. James Stevens, Deverell-street, Warner street, Great Dover-road, builder, May 13, 23, and June 20, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. Fitch, Union-street, Southwark. John Gibbon, sen., Canton-place, Commercial-road, block-maker, May 20, June 3, at eleven, and 20, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Atkins and Davis, Nicholas lane, London. Thomas Gains, Loughborough, corn factor, May 19, 20, and June 20, at eleven, at the Rutland Arms, Leicester. Holme, Frampton, and Co., New Inn; Bond, Leicester. DIVIDENDS. Thos. Starling Day and Henry Framingham Day, Swaff ham, Norfolk, bankers, May 30, at five, at the Norfolk Hotel, Norwich—George Gilberts, Burgh-in-the-Marsh, Lincoln, maltster, May 30, at one, at the George Inn, Spilsby—James Fletcher, Reddish, Manchester, calico printer, June 4, at four, at the Wellington Bridge Inn, Stockport—Thos. Fox and James Dudden Brodribb, Bris tol, tallow-chandlers, June 6, at one, at the Court of Com missioners—W. Rich, Wigan, Lancashire, builder, May 31, at eleven, at the King's Arms Inn, Liverpool—Ran dolph Penswick, Ashton within Mackerflehl, and Wm. Bone, Winstanley, Lancashire, cotton-manufacturers, May 31, at one, at the King's Arms Inn, Liverpool—Aaron Stock, Wigan, and West Derby, Lancashire, cotton-spinner, May 31, at three, at the King's Arms-Inn, Liverpool— Jane Raywood, Barnsley, Yorkshire, linen-draper, June 2, at eleven, at the Public-office, Barnsley—Robert Crytoft Harvey,, Alburgh, Norfolk, miller, June 2, at three, at the Bowling-green Inn, Norwich--William Birks, Charnes, Staffordshire, cheese-factor, June 4, at one, at the Roe buck Inn, Newcastle-under-Lyme—James Kerr and John Spear, Tooley-street, Surrey, grocers, June 3, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners—George Packwood, High steeet, Southwark, shoe-manufacturer, May 30, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners--Wm. Lewin Watkins, Long acre, Middlesex, coach-plater, May 30, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners—Gervase Stanley, Upper Ground street, Christchurch, Surrey, ironmonger, June 3, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners--Willi am Brydon, Cornhill, druggist, June 3, at eleven, at the Court of Commis sioners—George Burgiss, Eton, Buckinghamshire, currier, May 30, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners— Joseph Dempsey and John Reis, Well-street, Wellclose square, Middlesex, sugar-refiners, May 30, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners —Thomas Ellison Collinson, Bread street, wholesale •stationer, June 3, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners—Joseph Adcock, St. Mary-Axe, drug gist, May 30, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners —John Heron and Thomas Heron, Manchester, cabi net-makers, May 31, at twelve, at the Royal Hotel, Bir tningharo—William Cooke, Exeter, saddler, June 5, at eleven, at the King John Tavern, Exeter—J. Stokes, Winchester, Southampton, butcher, June 2, at two, at the White Hart Inn, Winchester—Samuel Evans, Ryeford Mill, Gloucester, clothier, June 2, at one, at the Office of Mr. Samuel Bush, Frome-Selwood—Ann Timothy and Mary Stuart, Regent-street, milliners, June 6, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners—Samuel Henry Leath, Old street, w atchmaker, June 6, at one, at the Court of Com missioners --John Hore Brown, Duke-street, Manchester square, ch ; Mat, June 6, at twelve, at the Court of Com missioners. C ERTIFICATES, MAY 30. John Brown e , jun., Norwich, iron-founder—,Sainuel Tyrrell, Bexhill, Sussex, common-hrewer—Eustace Wig zell, Lime-street, merchant—Joseph Bradley, Manchester, cotton-manufacturer__William Filbey, Heston, Middlesex, builder—Thomas Co ser, Stockton-on-Tees; Durham, draper—Daniel Terry, Spread Eagle-court, Threadneedle street, tailor. PARTNERSH/ps DISSOLVED. Old Bond -street, upholders—J. J. Webb and R. Webb, cd Pattison, sen. and J. Pattis on , - . s ilk-merchants—J. Curominsand B. S. H oug h ton , Ch e ap- Jun., N ew Ba n k-buildings, side, warebonsemen — R. Craggy and J. It Ranasden. Skipton, Yorkshire. painters --D gay and J. North, --e. Robinson and J. D or Huddersfiel d, dyers—J. Amesb y and J. Olive, Li ver pool, b oo t-makers curriers—T. B etts and R. Bury, nmaiaensd, No r th Shi e ld s , " and London waggoners—A. Gatcomb e andJrtiLl, Ipswich, Bridgewater, S om ersetshire, milliners—T. Englesethbridge, Lowe, Barbican, eng ravers —G. Birnie, A. Ferguson,nd F. .T — Ferguson, and R. Kilgour, Nether K A n inmundr. berdeen shire, manufacturers. SCOTCH SEQUESTRATION. John Hinshelwood, Glasgow, chin d I a- ea er, May 12, ands'-'7, at the Lyceum Rooms, Glasgow. MANCHESTER SMITHFIELD.—fIay 7. At rz:r lb. sinking the offal. 3,404 tat. to id. '25 6d. to "id. 415 Cattle—. 6 61 136 Pigs 230 Lambs --- at lod. to MEETINGS OF CREDITORS. LONDON DIARY..—MONDAY, 12.----At the Court of Commissioners, Basinghall-street. Delisser, A., Judd.street, apothecary cotns"rßY 1)1A RY.-11foinsT, MAY 12. Allen and Co., Alcester.—Sv;an, Alcester ll Bakewell, J., Manchester —Star, Manchester (Ilotteester..gnetinck, OYford tt; rtt;r;rtrrrrrtr,lrrrr 11 MANCHESTER POTATOE MA RKET.—lay 3. Potatoes, 4s. Od., Ss. 6d., and 6s. Od. per load of 12 score and 121bs. ; New ditto, N. Od., Os. Od., anti N. per ditto; Turnips. Its. 04., 13s. Od. and 14s. Od. per load of 16 peeks ; Onions, 445. Od., 465. (kl., and 48s. per 12 score. LONDON, SATURDAY EVENING, MAY 10, 1828. LONDON MARKETS. WHITECHAPEL HAY MARKET.—May B. Hay 725. Od. to 18s. Od. J ('lover .90i. Od. to 115 s. (NI. Straw-, 3N OIL to asi. PRICES OF HOPS (per Cwt.) —May P. Kent SuFsex Ditto 41; Is. 41. Bs. to Essex Ditto 4/. 4s. 4/, Iss. to Farnham Ditto, Fine O/. Os. 81. Os. to Seconds 0/. Os. 7/. ds. to 4/. 2s. 41. 15s. to 31. IGs. 41. „Is. to 4/. Os. 4/. 10s, to Kent 134 i Sumex Ditto Essex Ditto., 6/. 93. 4/. 151. 5/. Os. 91. As, EV. es. 51. Bs. 4/. G.. 41. lOs. PRICE OF OIL. Rape Oil, brown 321. Gs. Reflned 0 Linseed Oil -- , 6 Linseed Oil Cake at the Mill, per thousand 10 10 Rape Cake, per ton Kidneys.-- !Scotch Reds --,-----. Marsh Champions--.-- Oxnobles and Shaves PRICE OF POTATOES.—bias 9. 31. 15s. to 41: Os. per ton. 21. 15s. to 31. Os. ditto. 3/. Os. to 31. 105. ditto. 21. Os. to 3/. Os. ditto. d. to d. 15 17 20 27, PRICES OF LEATHER. Per lb. d. to d. Per lb. to 561 b...., 20 21 Tanned Horse Hides.- Ditto--.-60 to 661 b.— 22 23 Spanish Ditto Dressing II 17 Per dozen. Fine Coach Hides *l7 20 Calf Skins.-36 to 401 b. 19 23 Crop Hides, 35 to 4Ulb. 14 16 Ditto 50 to 701 b. 23 26 Ditto to 50Ib. 16 18 Ditto 70 to 80Ib. 20 23 Ditto.. lB 20. , Small Seals, Orcenland 18 19 RAW HIDES. Per Stone. s. d. to s. d. Per Stone. s. d. to s. d. Best Heifers& Steers 3 0 3 6 Ordinary ...................... 2 0 2 2 Midd1ing5..,..........:? 6 210 Market Ca1f—......—. 9 0 each --- Downs. - w. PRICE OF RAW FAT, per stone of 81b.—May 9. Price by Tallow (as stated by the Tallow Melters) 4d. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS, MAY 9. The Royal Assent was given by Commission to the 'rest and Corporation Acts Repeal Bill, the Promises and En gagements Bill, the Records Variance Bill, the Stamps on Insurances Reduction of Duty Bill, the Stamps on Cards and Dice Reduction of Duty Bill, the Consolidated Fund Ap propriation Bill, and to nineteen private bills. The Lords Commissioners were Lord Chancellor, the Earl of Shaftesbury, and Lord Bexley. On the motion of the Earl of SHAFTESBURY, a Message was sent to the Commons, requesting that Charles Western, Esti., a Member of the House, might be per mitted to be examined before the Select Committee of their Lordships appointed to inquire into the subject of the im portation of foreign wool. The Isle of Man Corn Trade Bill was read a second time, and ordered to be read a third time on Monday next. The Bishop of LONDON presented a petition from the Dean and Chapter of Hereford against granting any further concession to the Roman Catholics. _ _ Lord FERRERS presented a petition from Cleveland, in the North Riding of Yorkshire, in favour of the Tees Navigation Bill. The Noble Lord also presented a. petition against it. Lord BEXLEY presented a petition from a parish in Exeter, against further concessions to the Catholics. Lord KING presented petitions from Catholic inha bitants of Ashton-in-Macclesfield, Lancashire ; from St. Mary and St. Ann's, Shannon parish, Cork; and other parishes in Ireland, praying for Catholic Emancipation.— One of the petitions from Ireland also prayed that the Irish Sub-letting Act might not pass into a law. Lord CLIFDEN presented similar petitions from En field-laden-la-moor, and several parishes in Yorkshire ; from a place in Northumberland ; Kendal and its vicinity, in Westmorland;• and Stockdale, in the West Riding of York ; and by Lord Clarendon, from the Roman Cailolics of Carshalton, in the county of Surrey. Lord BEXLEY presented a petition from persons en gaged in the lead Mines in the North Riding of York, pray ing for an increase of duty on the importation of foreign lead. The Duke of RICHMOND moved that all the petitions respecting the Wool Trade be referred to the Committee on that subject.—Ordered. On the motion of Lord FERRERS, a copy of the Me morial presented by the Committee of Country Bankers to the Lords Commissioners of his Majesty's Treasury was ordered to be laid before the House. On the motion of Lord CARNARVON, the examina tion of the witnesses on the Penryn Disfranchisement Bill was resumed, and continued until a quarter past nine o'clock. Mr. ADAMS intimated that it was not his intention to call any further evidence in favour of the Bill. It was then arranged that Mr. HARRISON should open the case against the Bill on Monday, the 19th inst, The House adjourned until Monday next. SHEILP SKINS. 2e. &I. to Ss. Od. I Shearbums...—. O. Od. to N. 6d. Polled 4s. tid. to 6s. Od. PRIC OF TALLOW, Si Town Tallow --. 435. Od. Yellow Russia.---. 4li. Od. White— 49s. Od. Soap Ditto 395. Od. Melted Stuff 354. Pd. Ditto Rough 213. Od. , AP, &c. per 111111).—May .9. Yellow 50ap—.............,.-,. 16e. Od. Mottled, B2s. Od. White....— - - B6s Od . Graves _ _ ~,,... ~ 20+.04. Good Dreg5.,.......-.............. ss. Od. PRICE OF CANDLES. The price of Store Candles, in the retail shops, is as follows : Candles, per doz. 7s. tkl. to O. Od. Mo.tids, per doze* Bs. tkt. COAL INIAR Adair's -14. 31 Beaumont 3O 6 Charlotte - 3:3 0 Forrest 33 0 Heaton 35 6 Hebburn Main ...--. 35 0 Holyß ell,- 33 6 Killingworth 35 0 Orel's Redhugh 29 0 Pelaw -- _ .31 0 Pontop Windsor. 31 0 Shipcote 31 0 Tail field Wylam 32 6 Walls End Bell and Co. 35 6 Ditto Bell Robson & Co. 35 6 Ditto Bewickeand Co.— 36 3 Ditto Brown's 31 3 Ditto Burraton 35 0 Ditto Carr and Co..*. 32 6 Ditto Clarke and Co. « 32 3 Ditto Hilda _ 3l 0 Ditto Hotspur---....... 33 0 Ditto Northumberland 33 6 Ditto Pearoth 32 3 Ditto Perkins and Co. 35 3 Ditto 35 9 Ditto Russell's Ships at market, K ET.—May 9. Walls End Newmarch... 355. 6d, Ditto Walker 35 0 Beamish South M00r... 29 0 Eden Main Fawcett Alain 31 6 Harraton 31 0 Lambton's Lc' 31 0 Neskam Main 34 0 Russell's Lyon's—, 34 0 Wade's Eden 27 0 Walls End Hetton .37 0 Walla End Lambton......, 36 9 Walls End 34 6 Ditto Stewart's 37 0 2)itto Nutt Ditto Henderson 27 6 Russell's Hetton'sW.E. 36 3 Culin 27 0 Culin 28 0 Hartley 28 6 Llangenneth Coal .38 0 Stone Coal Cox Tantield Trader, .31 9 Ord's Redhugh Trader 29 0 Small Coal 20 6 Old Etherley 22 6 lips sold, 75 —Unsold, lA. COUNTRY CORN MARKETS DURING THE WEEK. Per Quarter. Ashburn Basingstoke Bath Bridgewater Bristol Chesterfield Derby Devizes Doncaster ---- Dorchester Exeter Hungerford Newbury Romsey Shaftesbury --..- Shepton Mallet Sherborne Taunton*. Yeovil Per Bushel. hrewsbury Wheat. 54 60 55 68 48 60 52 60 50 56 52 58 53 58 41 56 45 58 40 62 60 64 44 58 48 63 46 60 44 71 55 58 59 52 58 50 56 56 62 52 60 s. d. s. d. 86 90 :t2 34 29 32 29 34 28 30 28 32 28 32 32 35 32 35 26 33 25 IN 30 32 24 30 26 32 28 20 24 21 30 16 2.2 20 26 22 .27 17 20 16 28 22 25 20 21 24 28 18 31 30 34 '/7 29 2 8 28 30 24 28 24 23 26 23 s. d. s. d. 49 54 19 SO 23 27 20 24 22 26 18 22 20 22 s. d. s. d. 48 64 LEEDS CORN MARKET.—May 6. We had a fair supply of Wheat, but a thin attendance of buyers, which caused very little business to be done, and the few sales effected in Wheat were at full Is. per quarter decline. The supply of Barley was good for the season, and all sorts except the best samples were dull sale, and rather lower. In Oats, Shelling and Beans, there was no material alteration. Rape , eed as last advised. .. Wheat, Norfolk and Suffolk, 601 b. ---- York. and Lincoln. 601 b. Barley, Norfolk and Suffolk —,.. Yorkshire and Lincolnshire -- Grinding B eans 63lb. lBs. to 525. "4 - Oats, Potatoe —;dealing, Foreign 11d. to 12d....English I Id to 1211. per st. Shelling 27s. to 2Sf. per load. Rapeseed, English, 211. to 27/. NOTTINGHAM.—May 3. Wheat.— £2 18 0110ats £1 1 8 Rye £0 0 0 Barley SOUTHALL MARKET.—May 7. This day's market having been, for the time of year, rather largely supplied, and not very numerously attended by buyers, each kind of meat met with a very slow sale, at the following prices per stone of 81b. to sink the offals 6d. to 4s. 6d. Veal 4s. 4d. to ss. 6d. Mutton I 8 4 8 Pork.. 4 8 L 8 Lamb ss. 4d. to 68. 4d. The foregoing quotations are, Beef, Mutton, Veal, and Poik, the same as those of this day se'rmight ; from which Lamb re ceded Id. per stone. HAILSIIAM MARKET.—May 3s. Bd. to 4s. Od. I Ve , l 4s, 0,1. to 45. tid, _4 4 4 8 Pork 4 0 0 0 Lamb ss. to ss. 4d. Trade depressingly dull, and prices throughout on the decline: STEYNING MARKET.—May 5. Reef, 3s. 10d. to 4s. 841, Veal 4s. Od. to 4s. Sd, Mutton 4 2 I 4 10 Pork-- 0 0 0 0 Lamb ss. Od. to ss. 8d A moderate supply, and a dull trade. ARUNDEL MARKET.—May a Bad —...,...—....,. 4.9. Od . to 48.6 d• I Veal.* 4s. 4d• to 41. 10.1. Mutton ......--., 4 2 4 8 Pork* 0 0 0 0 Lamle . .ss. Od. to ss. 81. A limited supply, probably on account of Lewes Fair falling on the same day, and a dull trade. CHICHESTER M ARKET.—May 7. Beef 3s. 10d. to 4s. 61. Od. to 4,, t t;:1. Mutton 4 4 46 I 0 0 0 0 ss. 44. to ss. 6d. A moderate supply, trade with both Fat and Lean Stock ve:y RUMFORD MARKET.—May 7. s. d.to s. d. Beef 3 8 4 4 Mutton 3 10 4 6 s. d. to s. d. Veal Pork ss. 4d. to 6s. 4d. Stickling Calves front 124. t0:165.; Qua: ter old Pig9l6s. to als. each Supply good, and trade dull. MANCHESTER. YAI No. d. d. Throstle Twist, .20 —ll to 11 30...12 13 40,..1 ~ 17 MulecopTvisti 30 ._ 12/ for 40.,.14 13 no _176 20 ....20 tZ2 70..23 26 80 30 :N MARK: X.—May 6. '3O 101 to 111 40 111. 12 50 ,-- 141 13 GO -- 151 16 70 -- 19 20 80.. 22. 241 100 28 :0 ,120 34 30 ' 10 7 8 14 Si.. 9 18 9 ° 91 24 10 101 Mule Cop Weft-.. Weft from waste GLASGOW CORN A moderate business doing alteration in prices. Wheat, per 2401 b. s. d. s• d. British, old 3O 0 to 33 0 new Canada, free 29 0 31 0 Irish MA ItKET..—.l l 4ay 7. in Grain this week, but no Oats, per ?641b. s. d. s. d. Irish ................. 15 0 to 17 6 British ................ 16 0 '2O 0 Beans, I,er 2601 b. English ............ . 0 0 Scottish .............. 17 0 19 0 Pease, Scottish 17 0 13: 0 Oatmeal, per liOlb. 11 0 16 0 Flour, per 2801 b.... 46 0 47 0 Barley, per 3201 b. Engli s h 29 0 :30 6 Scottish 2S 0 30 O Irish 29 0 25 0 GLASGOW RETAII Beef per lb. Os. sd. toOs. Bd. Mutt0n......,,., 0 6 0 8 Veal .............. . 0 9 0 10 Hams ........... 0 5 0 7 Lamb......per qr. 0 0 0 0 quartertt Loaf... 0 9 0 0 k lour, per stone 2 0 2 8 [le M A RKETS.--.1%1 a y 5. Oatmeal, per st. Is. Ed. tots. Od. Peaseineal .. . 2 0 :3 4 Pot Barley, ca t. 12 0 17 0 Pearl ditto.... 20 0 24 0 Grey Pea5e........ 12 0 0 0 White ditto .... 1:3 0 11 0 Blue ditt0.....:; 0 14 0 HOP INTELLIGENCE. Wpm!Esictß, MAY 7.—ln our market on Saturday pocket 6 wry. Weighed, No variation in plicei. Barley. Oats. Beans. 47 50 ZZ 41 41) , W 34 40 48 42 48 45 48 48 55 41 56 42 50 44 46 38 60 38 CS 34 an 42 GI 42 48 42 48 40 44 40 42 s. d. s. d. 00 00 HOUSE OF COMMONS, MAY 9. The SPEAKER took the Chair this day at the usual hour, long before which every seat in the strangers' gallery was occupied, and the body of the House nearly filled with Members. A Messenger from the Lords requested the attendance of this House in the House of Lords, to hear his Majesty's assent given by Royal Commission to different Bills. The SPEAKER, and a majority of the Members, then withdrew, and were absent about a quarter of an hour. , - Upon their return the Speaker informed the House that his Majesty's Assent had been given by Royal Com mission to the Consolidated Fund Act , the Fire Insurance and Stamp severalA c t , Private CorporationActs.t e and Test Act Repeal Bill, Mr. Alderman WOOD presented a petition from the in habitant. of Sunderland and Newcastle, complaining of the combination of the coal-owners, and praying for a Committee of Inquiry. After a short conversation, in which Sir M. W. Ridley, Sir H. Hardinge, Mr. Hume, and several other Members took part, the petition was ordered to lie on the table and to be printed. Mr. C. DUNDAS presented a petition from Walling ford against the Alehouses Licensing Bill. Mr. JEPHSON brought in a Bill for amending the law relating to distress and replevin in certain cases in Ireland.—Read a first time ; to be read a second time on Tuesday neat. Lord STANLEY presented a petition from the Cham ber of Commerce of Manchester, against restrictions upon the importation of corn, and after a few .words from Mr. W. Whitmore, Sir G. Phillips, and Sir C. Burrell, it was ordered to be printed. On the motion of Mr. LAMB, several Orders of the Day were postponed. Mr. WESTERN presented a petition from a place in the county of Essex, against restrictions upon the importa tion of corn. _ On the !notion of Mr. CURTEIS, returns were ordered of the quantities of wheat and flour imported in the Isle of Man, and also the quantities exported thence, from the Ist December to the latest period to which the same could be made up. Mr. HOULDSWORTH presented a petition from Ponte fract, praying for the abolition of slavery..--Ordered to lie on the table. 111 r. MACQL EL:\ presented a petition from Ben. Willie, Secretary of a Society meeting at the Queen's Head, Corn hill, against the restrictive system as respected corn. Ordered to lie on the table. Sir J. WROTTESLEY moved for a copy of the me morial of country bankers, presented to the Lords of the Treasury the 19th instant.—Ordered. Mr. lIERRIES presented a petition from the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of Harwich, against the Catholic CROWN SOLICITORS BILL. Mr. DAWSON brought up the Report on this Bill, which was ordered to be read a third time on Monday next. STAMP ALLOWANCES BILL. Or. the motion of Mr. Dawson, the House resolved itself into a Committee on this Bill. The Bill went through the Committee, and the House having resumed, the Report was ordered to be read on Monday next. ADJOURNMENT OF THE HOUSE. It was ordered that the House at its rising do adjourn till Monday. CATLIOLIC CLAIMS.—PETITIONS. OTWAY CAVE presented a petition from the Roman Catholics of Leicester, in favour of the Roman Ca tholic Claims. Ur. M'DONNELL presented a petition from the Ro nal° Catholics of Macclesfield and Congleton, Cheshire, ant Rathmore, in Ireland, in favour of the Roman Catholic Chirps. Lord MILTON presented a petition from the Protestant Dissenters of Great Ripon, Yorkshire, in favour of Catho lic Maims.—Ordered to be printed. l a d STANLEY presented a similar petition from Wigan.--Ordered to be printed. ROMAN CATHOLIC QUESTION. Th e Order of the Day for the Adjourned Debate on the state Subjects s R oman Catholic Cl a i ms h av i ng b een rea d , cc That The SPEAKER'. Houseutbeof d o Laws put the question as f o ll ows : resolve ff . ee a itself i ng h into a i s i Committee,jest3, ,sßo man Catholic to theconsider the in Great Britain and Ireland, with a view to such a final and conciliatory adjustment as may he conducive to the p eace an d streng th o f t h e U n i te d Ki ng d o m, to the stability of the Protestant Establishment, and to the general satisfaction and concord of all, classes of his Mal,,sty's subjects.' Sir ROBERT INGLIS then rose and observed, that he felt a strong inclination to rise last night for the purpose of addressing the House, immediately after the Hon. Bart. (the Member for Westminster), had concluded the speech, with which he introduced the present question. Ile wish ed to have done so not b ecause h e re p ose d an undue confi dence in his own ability to answer the Hon. Baronet, but because he felt perfectly satisfied of the strength and justice of the cause which he was then about to advocate. It was no disparagement to the acknowledged powers of the Hon. Baronet to g•ly, that on such a subject even his ingenuity could accomplish nothing. The Hon. Baronet's argu ment, on this occasion, was founded on the same grounds as had already been made use of in similar discussions by the Honourable Baronet himself and many others. The Honourabl e Baronet, (after a slight allusion to the na tural rights and general claims of the Roman Catholics) pro ceeded to argue in favour of their demands on the grounds of specific conventions. Now he (Sir R. Inglis) had never thought that the Con , titution of England rereEnized the abstract right of any persons to the enjoyment of poli tical power and privileges, or even to the eligibility for such power. And, until the Constitution was so changed, that there remained no distinction between the owner of an estate by copyhold, and him who possessed his property by freehold—till there was no difference with respect to the right of voting between the freeholder to the amount of 395. and the freeholder of 40s.—till the individual pos sessed of an estate of 290/. could claim to sit in that H ouse, as well as he who had one of 300 I.—and until the alien born inhabitants o f thi s coun t r y w er e placed on an equ a l footing with the na ti ve -b orn inhabitants (both paying the same taxes and obeying the same law), he could not admit that the inhabitants of England, as such, had any abstract right to eligibility for political power and privileges. Di- - missing, with this sentence, the general and abstract claims of the Roman Catholics (which he must do the Honour able Baronet the credit to allow he had himself very slightly insisted on) he should proceed to a part of the subject which, in the opinion of the Right Hon. Baronet, was of greater importance—he meant the considerations involved in the Treaty of Limerick. He was satisfied that no claims were now withheld from the Roman Catholics which they were entitled to claim under the provisions of the Treaty of Limerick. Whatever rights might have been taken from them, their continuance was not guaran. teed by that Treaty. There was an old maxim of the law, —"nullum tempus occurrat reei," which suggested an other maxim equally applicable to public affairs, viz.— `• nullum tempus occurrat repuhlicas." lle could conceive that the mere desuetude of a claim, as it regarded the con duct of the parties interested in preferring it, was in itself a presumption against the claimants. In reference to this point be contended that, up to 1792 (comprehending a period of 100 years from the date of the Treaty of Lime rick), no claim similar to that now urged by the Roman Catholics had been preferred upon the faith of that com pact. Besides, it was only the sense which the parties to the treaty had at the time of its stipulations, that could satisfactorily explain the nature of these stipulations. The sense of the meaning of the treaty entertained by third parties, living in another age, and in a different country (however honest and intelligent these persons might be— and he by no means agreed to the censure passed upon the character of Bishop Burnet) could never he considered half such good evidence of its true meaning as was to be found in the opinion of the parties who had made the stipula tions, who were upon the spot at the time when they were agreed on, and who were deeply interested in rightly under standing and interpreting the contract. He contended that no such claims were set up under this treaty by the imme diate parties, as had now been attempted to be established by their descendants. Further, let it be recollected what was the general aspect of affairs in Ireland in the beginning of 1691, in the course of which year this treaty was agreed on. It would be found on examination, that though the circumstances of the English army at that period were nut very favourable, yet those of the Irish army were, to say the least, quite as unfavourable. In the beginning of 1691, Lord Tyrconnel wrote to James 11. desiring succour, or else to be allowed to make such terms for himself as he could obtain; and on the 14th of August, in the same year, when he was dying in the city of Limerick, his ad vice to the garrison AVM to capitulate on the beet condi tions they could procure. He (Sir R. Inglis) used this argument in reply to those who now state that it was a great object with William to obtain possession of Limerick, and that the Irish army being strong, and the English army weak and dispirited at the time, that object could not have been readily accomplished by force. Now, the contrary of all this was the fact, and it was deafly de monstrable, that when the English army appeared before Limerick, the Irish were not in a condition to insist upon terms, beyond all measure so favourable, as it had since been contended were then granted. Looking at this cir cumstance, the presumption, " a priori," was, that the terms obtained by the garrison of Limerick were by no means so good as was now pretended by the advocates of the Roman Catholics, who grounded the claims of their clients upon the faith of the provisions of the treaty in question. The Government of Ireland published a pro clamation on the 7th of July in the year referred to, in which they gave notice to all persons then in arms, who should speedily submit themselves, that they should not be troubled by penal statutes, and that their Majesties would take measures to obtain them such further securities as might be necessary for their safety. This was done in order to remove some doubts that were at that time entertained on the subject of the punishment to be apprehended by those who should lay down their arms. Here, then, a pro vision was made, not for privileges, but for pardon. But he had still stronger grounds to rely on—look not merely to this particular treaty, but consider what was the nature of the terms afforded to other cities in the progress of the campaign. First, however, he should observe, they were sometimes told by the orators of the Roman Catholics, with equal decency and discretion, that it never could be supposed that the terms granted to _ . the garrison of Lin;erick were meant only to apply to the free exercise of religion, and the undisturbed en joyment of private property. But if so, it was a some what singular fact, that on the 21st of July, in the same year, Waterford demanded a guarantee for the private ex ercise of religion, as the condition of its submission, and the demand was refused. A similar demand was made by the town of Dungannon, and the result was the same. At a different period, it must be admitted, the Lord Justices granted all those in arms who should submit themselves, the free exercise of their religion, but they who resisted lost the benefit of these very limited terms. Having refused the private exercise of religion to the city of Waterford, the English army appeared before Galway—an important fortress—which possessed the means of resistance, and therefore obtained better term.. To the Clergy and Laity of this town, the free exercise of religion in private was conceded—lawyers were allowed to follow their profession —and estated gentlemen received permission to carry a gun ! These were considered to be favourable conditions. Thus it appeared that the Irish army was not in a condi tion to extort terms similar to those now said to have been secured, not merely to the garrison of the city in question, but to all the inhabitants of Ireland by the Treaty of Lime rick. In Cromwell's wars, the garrisons of the conquered towns to Ireland were only permitted to stipulate for their own numbers—and it was never meant to he inferred that the capitulations thus agreed on comprehended other par ties within their provisions. When the English army ap proached Limerick, De Ginckle having received orders from King William to bring the war to a close, upon al most any terms, granted this Treaty. Towards ascertain ing the meaning of the provisions, which were agreed on, it maw he no bad way to examine the nature of those which were rejected. What terms did the garrison demand, and what were refused ? On the 28th of December the garri son of Limerick, being dispirited by the eve at of an unsuc cessful sally, and the continued neglect and absence of their expected French Allies, asked a suspension of hostilities.. having obtained it, they sent on the following day to de mand terms of capitulation from the General of the English army, One of the articles then proposed, he was willing to admit, would, if granted, have at once placed the llo man Catholic inhabitants of Ireland on the same footing as the Protestants. By this article they would have been eligible to places in Corporations—might have become Grand Jurors—in fact (and he was ready to admit it freely, for it strengthened his case), every thing which the Roman Catholics could desire was conceded—they were rendered capable of the enjoyment cf equal civil rights and privileges with the rest of their fellow subjects—no thiug was withheld. Such would . have been the conse quences of the ratification of this article. Was it conceded ? De Ginck/e returned for answer that he was a stre.naer to the Constitution of England, hut he knew enough cf it to be able to perceive that the terms imposed were equally hostile to that Constitution and his own honour. Ilia re ply was beeked by the erection of a new battery against the place the same day. On the evening of the clay, the garrr son sent a mess age t o i nqu i re w h at t erms D c fiinck h r s would grant? Thi s w as l a yi ng tl wma d ves en tirely feet. The circumstances referred to were best authority, that o f an e y e - w it ness (Stove), who trade a journal o f the tr a n sac ti ons ever y day they;oco He (Sir R. Inglis), therefore, conjectured t he ancurrio, of, • It was idle what was granted by what had been re ftised. I he Roman to say the Treaty el Limerick admitted t Catho lics to all the privileges of the state, the,d• When the H on the su could r not ha Limerick concession ofwhich was thus directly and positively ref u e rrender of Baronet told them that it was to derived frO'inmtrwthdec in tended his words to be take n in their a sense and ap plication, for that revolution had been previously consoli dated. And when t he actors of the Roman Cat holic As hie Great Britain owed the revol ution, e :tei As sociation were in the habit of saying, that but for the b ea e p en ituti a la pe r ty o p f Limerick ce e :rei t g h n e present ingin. King the enorttuld h Vo ofG po arni w h auy a , v i e t became pectiFYY tg ?lei; tt'tt atithtr tS gle; sttrreaoe : nor PRICE 7D. "?- • • / feZ; spio. 10 the Taity of Linurick, Oas 41 that Weight and irnpor. tallow to be attached that it was attempted to connect with them. The principal articles of the treaty on which stress was laid were the Ist, 2d, and 9th, but they afforded no reasonable grounds for the present measure if the whole of the treaty was taken into consideration. This . was the course adopted by his Right Hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department, in opposition to the argu ments made use of by the advocates of the Roman Catholics, who grounded their construction upon an examination, not .f the entire treaty, but of particular parts of it. Could it be believed that in a treaty, one article of which g; ve Roman Catholic Noblemen and gentlemen the right eu liberty " to ride with a sword and case of pistols," a nd " keep a gun in their houses for the defence of ti e same, or for fowling"—could it be believed that in such treaty it was intended to confer on the Roman Catholics all the political rights and privileges now demanded cn the faith of it? The first article parented to the Roman Ca tholics such privileges in the exercise of their religion as were consistent with the laws of Ireland. It ran as folloics " That the Roman Catholics of this kingdom shall en - joy such privileges in the exercise of their religion, as are consistent with the laws of Ireland, or as they did enjoy in the reign of King Charles 11. ; and their Majesties, as soon as their affairs will permit them to summon a Parlia ment in this kingdom, will endeavour to procure the said Roman Catholics such further security in that particular, as may preserve them from any disturbance upon account of their said religion." Now it hail been well observed that the privileges ern joyed by the Roman Catholics 10, the reign of Charles IL were very different from those that fell to their lot in the time of James 11. The distinction between the two periods was wide indeed, as it respected the rights and imerranities en joyed by the Roman Catholics in either; and if the words " James II." had been substituted for " Charles II." in the treaty, the meaning to be attached to its stipulations must necessarily be -much more favourable to the cause of the Roman Catholics. The Hon. Baronet last night dis tinguished between what he denominated the first and se cond clause or division of the first article--.the first part guaranteeing the privileges of the Rorean Catholic religion ; as they previously existed at the time of Charles II ; the latter member of the article promis ng " such further stet curity in that particular as may preserve them from aoy disturbance en account of their said religion." Not . this evidently referred, not to civil rights, but to religions pri vileges. What was the state of the Roman Catholics i n Ireland in the time of Charles 11. ? By the 17th and 18th of Charles 11. the oath of supremacy was required to In taken even by school-masters and entre variety of civil officers. At that period the Roman Catholics might . not, by statute indeed, have been formally and legally ex cluded from Parliament, (although it was his impression that the Act of the 2d Elizabeth, had the effect of exclude ing them), but it was clear, that the two Houses of the legislature then required their Members to receive the Com munion of the Lord's Supper on taking their see.ts. Thte was a virtual exclusion of the Boman Catholics frntn P ar _ liament. In the same times Roman Catholic lawyers were prevented from practising at the bar. P,oman Catholic priests were liable to banishment, and the Duke of Or mond exercised the power and banished them. It ap. peered from this, that the privileges which the Roman Catholics enjoyed in the reign of Charles 11. were not very extensive. But, to come to the second article of the treaty, that on which the Honourable Baronet chiefly relied in his address to the House last melt. It pro, vides that " all the inhabitants or residents of Limeriek, or any other garrison now in the possession of the Irish, all officers and soldiers now in arms under any commis sion of King James, or those authorized by him, to parcel the same in the several counties of Limerick, Clare, Kerry, Cork, and Mayo, or any of them, and all the com missioners, officers in their Majesties' quarters, that belong to the Irish regiments now in being, that are treated with, and who are not prisoners of war, or have taken protec tion, and who shall return"—the House will pay particu lar attention to this part of the article relative to the sub mission of the parties to the authority of the Crown—" and. submit to their Majesties' obedience, and their and every of their heirs shall hold, possess, and enjoy all and every their estates of freehold and inheritance"—thes,s words, to . which the Hon. Baronet particularly referred, occur a little • further on, and if lam not fully prepared to answer hie argument, grounded upon their tenour and effect, then am I most grossly deceived—but the article proceeds--" and all their rights, titles, and interest?, privileges, and immu nities, which they and every or any of them held, enjoyed, or were rightfully and lawtullt entitled to in tie reign of King Charles 11., or at any time since, by the laws and statutes that were in force in the said reign of King Charles ll"—the Hon. Baronet stops here, and endeavours to apply the stipulation to political rights and privileges; but let us proceed a little further—" and shall be put in possession, by order of the Government, of such of them as are in the King's hands, or in the hands of his terants, without being put to any suit or trouble therein"—now to what can this clause apply except to the restoration and free enjoyment of the rights of property?—" and all such estates shall be freed and discharged from all arrears of Crown rents, quit rents, and other public charges incurred and become due since Michaelmas, lfiSS, to the day of the date hereof ; and all persons comprehended in this article shall have, hold, and enjoy, all their goods and chatt e l s , real and personal, to th e m or any of tem belonging ann remaining, either in their own hands or the hands of any persons whatsoever, in trust for, or for tie use of them, m any of them ; and all and every the said persons, - of what profession, trade or calling soevee they be, shall and may use, exercise and practice, their several and respective pro fessions, trades, and callings, as freely as they did use, exer cise, and enjoy the same in the reign of King Charles the Second ; provided that nothing contained be construed to extend to or restore any forfeiting person now out of the kingdom, except what are hereafter comprised ; the:melded also, that no person whatsoever shall have, or enjoy, the benefit of this Article, that shall neglect or refuse to take the Oath of Allegiance made by Act of Parliament in England, in the first year of the reign of their present Majesties, when thereunto required." It was unnecessary again to say all this applied strictly to private privileges and the rights of individual property. Could any man of common tense, after reading the words of the . Arti cle, doubt that such was its object ? After that, was it possnele to pretend that the construction put upon the Treaty by the Honourable Baronet was the true one? It should be recollected, that the History of Bishop Burnet was not published until fifty years after the period to which he was referring; and it should also be borne in mino, ths.t he inserted an article in the treaty which was not to be found in it. Bishop Burnet was not, therefore a com petent judge upon this subject. But. what was the inter pretation put upon that treaty by the English Perliamene in Ifi92 ; they considered that the seemed article of that treaty referred exclusively to estates of freehold inheritawet and that the whole of the treaty included none of those. rights which were now claimed. What, he wcmuld ask, was the opinion of James 11., a good autherite, no doubt as to the intent and purport of this treaty. He stated that the besieged when in a hopeless situatietz had the courage to insist on and obtain articles of security, articles o-hich secured to their country the iree exercise of the Roman Catholic religion, as under the reign of Charles 11., a t '`! which restored to them their estates, and their goods aims chattels, as they existed before the war. If then Jam es wer in Inland, 11. considered that the Irish had secured to themaelt i " . for their kingdom, privileges such as were now otnt e f,: w.. ,.. , was it possible that he could have omitted it "i, this did ' Inglis)not ten resod of his opinions. He (Sir R. iliac defend the penal laws, but he thought tl ii "t e tt 0 ' , 7 , 1 111 . ota fairness, when we remembered the enacnottmet ttit eteve, we should also remember the conduct of l Irish Parlia -0„, Parliament which a m lm en o t st im d m es e t d ro i ; t :d ly construction If ' however, the treaty did bea th e n which had de e that thos e been put upon it, writer reaty knew W 1,1" proposed,, t mat 1. it was to be and those who signed th 3t f a hi } her subjected to the decision ret o le against the (The Hon. Baronet procee , 'ed to 4- u propriety of consi dering Catholic claims the Romeo. ms supported Iy the Treaty consequence thPereePedrointegstethel te of Limerick ; ha t n t l , anee of his sitting under the previous to the thtion of England e.eit ga ll ery , shamequen"Y ur ?PPing his voice, we were uneble accurately j , • ow l fleet]. Stdted, he observe eb du t ie every( stpoilie.gdßrgae.n L e land, had held out certain pledges to tire people of thee to f t ° l l , l :: v i::.. Pitt, prey t them he eht hadua thought h g v c ountry which i i en c nt h ..A t ii h r e i‘. ) , , ,: n .i o tit r , v iitlta c d h: o ra reu a did n ee d n e n i i i_ t , pledge the Kith th nor could he pledge the British Parlia ment to the adoption of any particular course. All that was contemplated by such a pledge was, that the indivi dual giving it, ehon1;1 be prepared to redeem it by any per sonal sacrifice. This Mr. Pitt was unq uestionably pre pared to do. On the ground, therefore, that any pledge Was given at tire time of the Union, he could not consider the Catholics justified in claiming those concessions tyhich they now called upon the British Parliament to make. If. then, an the ground of national right they could demand nothing—if, then, by the Treaty of Limerick they could claim nothing—and if on the grounds of any understanding at the time of time union they could expect nothing —the whole question became one of expediency, and he con s id ere d that resistance to those claims was the duty of the House. He confessed that h e was old and fastidious enough to attach some importance to the objection that had been raised to the granting of those claims un the ground of the corona tion oath, and he did not see how the King of England could take that oath, and yet concede to the demands of the THE EXHIBITION of PORTRAITS „,, of the .MOST ILLUSTRIOUS PERSONAGES t;i3OZGLISLI HISTORY from the Galleries of the Ncr- Nt utY, and f rom P u bli c Coll e ctions, IS NOW OPEN, at p e4 € ll . 14ARDIN6- and LEPARD'! 4 , No. 4, Pall Mall Att. 04 A arnittance, by TICKETS ONLY, which may be had ....... 4 2_Plication as above. GRAND' UNION CANAL. NNICE is hereby given, that the next PR GENERAL ASSEMBLY of the COMPANY of be eRIETORS of the GRAND UNION CANAL, will do n, at th e C rown an d Anchor Tave rn , i n the Strand, o' c i"! 1 , on Moarn.kr the 2d day of June next, at Eleven at T ill the forenoon, and that the Chair will be taken Welve o'clock precisely. Ca nal RB. C. ALE Clerk to the Company. S, *°ffice, 20, Surrey-street, Strand, May, 1828. S TATES FOR SALE IN THE COUNTY OF EAST LOTHIAN. ‘V r . 0 BE SOLD BY PUBLIC ROUP, pia the R oya l E xc h ange Coffee-house, Edinburgh, on „ . , 1113 3Av, the 27th day of JUNE, 1828, at Two o'clock 11.7 111 " n, (if not previously disposed of by Private riTßain,) tHE ESTATES of LEASTON and ria PLEWLANDHILL, lying contiguous in the Pa- Rumbie, and County of East Lothian. p i ingse Estates contain ONE THOUSAND AND ;CIRTY-TWO ACRES, Scots measure, or thereabouts , lyvhi c h about ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY 'RES are covered with very valuable Planting. Lands are in general of a very good quality, partly 4 1 dry free soil, well adapted to green crops of every kind, 4 4 1 ,artly of a rich loam and clay, yielding good crops of t 0 ,,,_ 4(13 of grain. They are extremely well situated as to a and markets, being about sixteen miles from Edin to,, e c ,„"t h , tight from Dalkeith, and six from Haddington, the rna l l;2 ° ,,o ; at the two latter places there are the best shut 7 10 r grain in Scotland. The lands are only distant di 1 " Irides from coal and lime, and the roads in all are excellent. t are all under Leases current for about ten years, The Re nta l at present is about 1220/. Land, h o ld of the Crown, and afford two Freehold be i n t h e cou nty. `l' Mansi on -h ouse of L e aston is at present in bad I, , N sr , but i t coul d he ma d e a com f or table residence at no klit r eat expellee. There are many beautiful situations Lili:Ne 9 _ on the grounds, and )eing in the neighbourhood re k ,,C , and plenty of freestone, and not far from i~nce. buildings of every kind may he erected at an easy itg lilt " Estates are surrounded and intersected with Trout s 4 o fulets, an d th ere are pl en ty o f Game on them. The p e burdens are very moderate. Al t :* all further particulars application may be made to r,a• Williams, Brooks, Powell, and Broderip, Lincoln's lAndon ; or to Alexander Pearson, W.S., 17, Royal /.; tl ', Edinburgh, with the latter of whom are the Title colt.