The Sun. — London, England, 1841-06-10 00:00:00

NIORNINO .EDITION must say I have not been able to discover any novelty or discrimination in the remarks which he has addressed to the House.) It is now nearly twenty years since I first took part in these discussions. On the first class the justice of the claim was still more manifest, but the same arguments which have been used by the Learned eliciior-General were urged against the first class. The flotse of Commons, however, decided in favour of the claim. The same arguments were adduced against the eceeond cle.es and yet the House of Commons agreed to ''.: l l^ vete. Tee same arguments have been brought against the third class ; the matter has undergone con - siderable discussion, and three votes have been taken upon it. Sir, I am sorry that the Hon. and Learned Gentleman should have attempted to induce the House not to accede to this motion, by stating that the funds received from Denmark are now exhausted. We know full well that 1,200,0001. came into the British Exche quer, and of this sum not more than 600,0001. has been paid. The interest alone would have doubled that amount.—(Hear, hear.) From the circumstance that the Hon. and Learned Gentleman has resorted to that thrc adhere argument, I infer that he is conscious that he has no other to act upon.—(Hear.) Let us not forget the circumstance which attended the commencement of the war. The Right Hon. Gentleman the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and his predecessors in 'office, have contended that by admitting this claim you would be establishing a dangerous precedent. The war against Denmark was commenced in the most atrocious manner. Nothing but overpowering fear on the part of the Bri tish Government—politica feelings we have nothing to do with, or dealing with individual interests—could have induced them to adopt the course which they did. I quite agreed with the Hon. and Learned Gentleman that when the Government had undertaken an expedition which they supposed to be necessary for the interest of Great Britain, it would have been improper to answer inquiries — l e Are we going to war or not ? May we trade or may we not ?" If the Government had given such information key would undoubtedly have risked the success of the expedition.—(Hear, hear.) I do think that the circumstances which have been mentioned by the Solicitor-General, circumstances which place the claimants, in this case, in a peculiar position, and make it almost impossible any similar case should occur—con sidering what Parliament has already done, the long and elaborate discussion which has taken place, and remem bering that with reference to dates and facts the op position had been found defective ; for although I do not recollect the whole of the dates alluded to by the Hon. and Learned Gentleman, I think the Hon. Baronet who has spoken, stated very correctly that many, if not all of the seizures were made at a time when British subjects had a right to expect security—under all these circum stances, I must say that it would only be an act of justice to these individuals, who have suffered for so many years, that we should at last compensate them as far as we can for the losses to which they have been subjected. I hold them to be entitled to receive both the principal and the interest, but as the principal only is concerned, let us grant one part of the justice to which they are entitled. At any rate, I shall certainly vote, as I have done, for going into Committee, in order that justice may be ob taine by these'viduals.—(Hear, hear.) The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he was rather disposed to consent to the appointment of the Committee than to divide the House on the question. He was determined that the matter should come fairly before the House. The parties had before stated that they did not go for the money, but for the principle. It was now made a question of actual money. He did not think he need discuss the question at length as it had been exhausted in the arguments of his Hon. and Learned Friend the Solicitor-General, who had, he should say, completely demolished the case of the Hon. and Learned Member for Liverpool. He should com plain that lie had not on a former occasion been treated with courtesy by the Hon. and Learned Gentleman. He b e et applied to him When the question came last under th e en .esideration of the House to defer the discussion in the absene' trihis Hon. and Learned Friends.the Attor ney and Solicf,TGenerals, considering that the debate could not well te. conducted without them, the one of them being absent uP:en business, and the other from ill ness ; but the Hon. and l earned Gentleman refused to T accede to the request, and he thought he had a right to complain of that. He would noi:, however, oppose the motion for going into Committee, butt he would take the opportunity of stating his views on the bringing up of the Report. Mr. CRESSWELL was surprised that the Riglit Hon. Gentleman had complained of his want of personal cu ' 4l.- tesv towards him in a former debate. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER—Yes, personal. Mr. CRESSWELL—WiII the Right Hon. Gentleman tell me the date ? . The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said that on the occasion of the last debate, on his asking the Hon. and Leirned Gentleman to postpone it, in the ab sence of the Law Officers of the Crown, the Hon. and Learned Gentleman told him that he would not, and that he thought he was justified in not granting the request, He had, accordingly, brought forward the question, which left him (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) under the inconvenience of answering, in the absence of his Hon. and Learned Friends. Mr. CRESSIVELL said that he had not the slightest recollection of the occurrence ; but `if it. had taken place he thought he was perfectly justified in taking such a course, because—the subject had been argued on two oc casions befor. It had been argued under the Right lion. GentlemaWs• predecessor, by the Attorney and. Solicitor-Generals ; and he had himself at that mo ment a note of the arguments they had used. He could not; therefore, understand why he should have been called on to put off a motion of the kind from day to day, and' from night to night, while a number of per sons, who had entrusted him with their case, were look ing for justice. If, therefore, he had acted as was said, he was justified in doing so.—(Hear, hear.) But after the House had twice affirmed the principle of the motion, and when increasing majorities had declared in favour of its principle, he should say the Light Hon. Gentleman had no reason to expect that he (Mr. Cresswell) should postpone its consideration in the absence of the Law Officers of the Crown. As, however, the Right Hon. Gentleman would not oppose the motion for going into Committee, he would not al hide further to the matter. Sir CHARLES GREY distinctly recollected that the Chancellor of the Exchequer had stated in the former debate, that he was placed in a very inconvenient situa tion by the absence of his two Hon. and Learned Friends, and that another occasion for the discussion would be more convenient to himself ; but he had not put it as a matter of personal favour to the Hon. and Learned Gen tleman, who said that as the matter had been armed be fore, he would not consent to the request. Mr. PHILIP HOWARD said that it appeared to him that his Right.lion. Friend bore too hard upon the Hon. and Learned Gentleman, because his Right Hon. Friend must be aware that it was his duty, as guardian of the public purse, to make the best defence which he could,. while the Hon. and Learned Gentleman was equally justified in injuring his ease. Ile had on more than one occasion voted against the Right Hon. Gentle man, but he did not see anything in his conduct which he could not applaud. After a few words from Mr. WARBURTON and Mr. OVONNELT„ the House went into Committee ; and the resolution for an Address to her Majesty, was agreed to. The House then resumed, and the Report was agreed to be takeo into consideration to-morrow. CHARITABLE TRUSTS BILL. Oa the motion for the third reading of the Charitab'e Trusts Bill, Sir E. SUGDEN objected to the third clause. The Bill purported to be one for facilitating the transfer of trust estates of charitable property ; but this clause was introduced clandestinely, and went to declare that trust estates vested in the old corporations should be now N ested in the trustees appointed by the Lord Chancellor under the provisions of the Municipal Corporation Act. The clause was smuggled into the Bill for political pur poses. The Hon. and Learned Gentleman then proposed certain amendments in the clause. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said that the clause was absolutely essential. There was no s tying in whom those trust estates would be vested, and it was for the advantage of all parties to have it known in whom the legal estate was vested. The House then divided, when there appeared_ For the clause For the amendment Majority . for the clause 5 The Bill then passed, and House went into COMMITTEE OF SUPPLY. Mr. FOX MAULE moved a grant of 666,230/. for defraying the expenses of the embodied Militia in Great Britain and Ireland. The vote was agreed to, and the Report ordered to be received to-morrow (this day). The House then resumed, and on the motion of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, went into COMMITTEE OF WAYS AND MEANS. The following votes were agreed to :-6,200,000/. from the Consolidated . Fund ; 47,3681. 18s. surplus grants of former years 500,0001. tranfer of aids. The Report was then ordered to be brought up to morrow (this day). MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BILL. The amendments to this Bill were agreed to, and the Bill was ordered to be read a third time to-morrow. BRIBERY AT ELECTIONS BILL. In answer to a question from Mr. S. O'BRIEN, Mr. P. MtULE said that it was the bona fide inten tion of the Government to proceed with this Bill to morrow. NEW SOUTH WALES. The Reports of the_ New South Wales, &e., Bill, and the Western Australia Bill, were received, and ordered to be read a third time to-morrow. lIOUSI✓ - OF INDUSTRY (IRELAND), &c., BILL. On the motion for receiving the Repart'of this Bill, Sir E. ItNATCIII3IMT4 com;lained warmly- of the conduct .1 thOirx:roment in ()ringing. forward mea sures which We csed to thei r d ec l arat i ons. MACAULA defended the Government, and said they had made no declarations of the kind alluded to. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL for Ireland also de fended the conduct of the Government, and said that this could not properly be considered a Government measure. Colonel SIBTHORP quite agreed with his Right Hon. Friend (Sir E. linatchbull) in the charge he had made against the Oovernment, and he was glad that his Right Hon. Friend had exposed their humbug.—(Hear.) As he had before stated, he beieved a more idle, a more in efficient, and a more incapable Government never ex isted. He could not trust th em an inch, and he would watch 4ncl expose their proceedings as he had done. Their principle was, " Let those laugh that win—let us get our Wanes, and never mind the business of the eatustry.liear, hear.) Mr. FALAI:LE said "the observations of the Hon. and I Gashallnt lla not Metiaber are usoa to utterly below my contempt, that coedes c notice them.' After a f e w other Observatiobservationd e n - the Colonel SIBTO w Dap, measure,ht) had been observed in eon sultation with several Hon. Members around him, left the House. Mr. W. WYNN said that some words had just fallen from the Hon. Gentleman opposite, which appeared to be very offensive to his Hon. mid Gallant Friend who had just left the House. In order, therefore, to avoid any offensive proceedings, he should move that the Hon. Member for Lincoln be ordered to attend in his place forthwith.—(" Oh, oh," and " Hear, hear.") Honour able Gentlemen might laugh at him, but he made the motion on his own knowledge.—(Hear, hear.) The motion having been put, and the Speaker decid ing that it was carried in the affirmative, the Sergeant was despatched after Colonel Sibthorp. The report , in in the meantime was ordered to be re ceived. The Deputy-Sergeant then entered and informed the Speaker that he had served the order of the House on Colonel Sibthorp. He had served it on him in the pas sage leading to the House ; and he believed the Hon. and Gallant Member was then in one of the Committee rooms. Col. SIBTHORP having then entered, accompanied by Sir E. KNATCHBULL, The SPEAKER said that having been given to under stand that some words had been used by an Hon. Mem ber which had been considered personally offensive by the Hon. and Gallant Member for Lincoln, he felt it was his duty to call on the Hon. Member to retract the ex pressions. He also wished to say that he considered the Honourable Member had retracted the expressions or else he should certainly have called him to order. When the Hon. Member had commenced his speech he Lad used words which might have been thought offensive, upon which he (the Speaker) called him to order, and the Hon. Member as he understood then retracted his words. If, however, that were not the case he was sure the Hon. Member would see the necessity of now re tracting expressions which were considered by another Hon. Member as personally offensive. Mr. FOX MAULE said he was aware that there was neither honour nor anything else to be gained in pro longing such a discussion. He did not want to conceal that it had been his wish to mark strongly his sense of the words which had fallen from the Hon. and Gallant Member. If, however, he had violated the orders of the House, he was ready to retract the expressions he had used. He would again repeat, that the statement brought against himself and his Hon. Friends around him, was such that he wished strongly to mark the sense which he entertained of them. Colonel SIBTHORP said that he had been actuated by only one motive, and that motive he had a right to act upon. He should always exercise in that House his right of expressing his opinion with regard to the con duct of public men. He had left the House, as he should always do upon such occasions ; and though he was ready to bow to any just authority, he considered that the guardianship of his own honour and of his own character, both as a public and a private man, should never prevent him from protecting that honour and that character in the manner most consistent with his feel ings, and with what he owed to his duty and himself. If he rightly understood the Hon. Gentleman, he had not retracted the expressions he had used. If he had done so, he (Colonel Sibthorp) was perfectly satisfied ; but he thought he had a right to put it to the Chair whether he was bound to consider that the words and imputa tions directed against him were wholly and entirely re tracted ? Sir R. PEEL submitted that the Hon. Gentleman had done all that could be expected from him, and that his Hon. and Gallant Friend should be perfectly satisfied.-- (Hear, hear.) Colonel SIBTHORP said, that such being the opinion of gentlemen careful of their honour in that House, he would rest satisfied. Mr. T. DUNCOMBE attempted to address the House amid loud cries of " Order, order, chair, chair." The SPEAKER said he would submit to the Hon. Member whether he did not think that the matter had gone far enough, and that there was no occasion for further prolonging the discussion?—(Hear.) The subject was then dropped. CLERK OF THE PEACE COMPENSATION BILL. On the Order of the Day being read for the bringing up the Report on the Clerk of the Peace (Lan caster) Bill, Mr. DLTGDALE moved that the Bill be recommitted. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL opposed the motion. The House then divided, when the numbers were— For the motion 5l Against the motiou 5O Majority... The ' Bill having then been ordered to be recommitted, Mr. D :TGDALE moved that it be an instruction to the Committt.:to grant compensation to the Town Clerk of the Peace for ti e Borough of Birmingham.—Agreed to. :Y . moved that it be an instruction Mr. COURTENi; mpensation to the Clerk of to the Committee to graZl puchester. Justices of the Peace for M.' e motion, no petition Mr. M. PHILIPS opposed . *ll . and the feeling of having been presented in its favoe , the inhabitants of the town being unannously against it. Strangers were then ordered to wit:.kdraw, and the House divided, when there appeared— For the instruction !2B Against it 65 Majority against it —37 Mr. AINSWORTH moved that it be an instruction to the Committee that the provisions of the Bill should be extended to the borough of Bolton. It was called for on precisely the same grounds as the borough of Man chester. Mr. GRIMSDITCH opposed the motion. In the case of Manchester a decision as to the question of the va lidity of the charter had been decided by a Court of Law, but the question of the validity of Bolton charter was in dispute. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said that the motion had no tendency whatever to decide tbe question of the validity of the charter. It merely wen!: to decide the question of compensation in case the charter should be found to be valid. Mr. AINSWORTH said that the parties to the litiga tion of the Bolton charter had agreed to abide by the de cision of the Manchester case, and therefore it could no* be said that no decision had been come to on the question. Mr. WYNN opposed the motion, on the ground that the people of Boltcn ought to have had due notice by the introduction of a Bill for that special purpose, so that they might have an opportunity of petitioning against it. The gallery was then cleared, but the motion was negatived without a division. The House then went into Committee. On the motion for introducing a clause to include Bir mingham in the provisions of the Bill, Mr. HUME hoped that the same course would be pur sued as in the Bolton case, and that a special Bill would be required for the purpose. Mr. DUGDALE said that the compensatien was not objected to by any of the authorities of Birmingham, and, therefore, he should move the insertion of the clause. Mr. lIUME objected, on the principle laid down by the Hon. Member for Montgomery. Mr. C. DOUGLAS said that Compensation had been given to the Clerk of the Peace of Warwick, and that the caso of the Town Clerk of Birmingham was precisely similar. Mr. WARBURTON said they had nothing to do with the merits of the case. The House had decided in the case of Bolton that a preliminary objection existed in point of form, and precisely the same objection existed to the present clause. Sir R. PEEL thought that the tcw i of Birmingham having had notice, and not having petitioned against it, it would be pressing the matter too far to oppose this clause. Mr. WARBURTON asked how they were to know that the people of Birmingham had had sufficient notice? Mr. G.RIMSDITCH said that he had un d ers t oo d from the Members for Birmingham that they would not interfere. Mr. HUME said that there was a Member for Bir mingham in the House, who would not declare one way or the other ; and therefore how could they tell whether the inhabitants had or had not had sufficient notice? The clause was then brought up and added to the Bill. The House then resumed ; the Report was received, and ordered to be read a third time to-morrow. ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE BILL. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL moved the further con sideration of the Report on this Bill. Sir E. SUGDEN said he thought this Bill would not have been brought forward at this period of the Session, still he would not oppose the Bill if some modification were proposed in it. It would be extremely inconvenient to establish a new Court of Chancery at this period of the year. He knew from experience how difficult it was to conduct the business of the Courts during a gene ral election. With the approach of the election it would be highly improper to add a new Court to those already in existence. He (Sir Edward Sugden) was rather surprised, un d er all circumstances, that the Bill should be pressed upon the House. The House had declared their want of confidence in the Government, and the Noble Lord opposite (Lord J. Russell) had been found wanting. He was now about to appeal to the country and to stand upon his trial. Still he would not altogether oppose the Bill. What he would propose was this—That a clause should be added, providing that the Bill should not come into operation until the 10th of October. In the present position of the Government, was that, or was it not a reasonable proposition 2 (Hear, hear.) The result of the elections would be known in two or three weeks. He could not consent to place all this patronage in the hands of the Government until it was known whether or aot they possessed the confidence of the country. He trusted that no Ministers placed in the delicate situa tion in which the present Ministry were, would be al lowed by that House to make the appointments to which he alluded. He should therefore move that the follow ing clause be added to the Bill :—" And be it enacted, that this Act shall commence and have effect on and from and after the 10th day of October next, and not be fore, except where a subsequent day is hereinbefore fixed." Leave was then given to the Hon. Gentleman to bring up the clause, which was read a first time ; and on the motion that it be read a second time, Lord J. RUSSELL rose and said that he had hoped that the Right Hon. Gentleman opposite would have been satisfied with the obstacles he had already thrown in the wuy of the House proceeding with the Bill.— (Hear, hear.) He had hoped that the time had come when that Right Hon. Gentleman would have con sidered further interposition and obstacles on his part unnecessary. The Right Hon. Gentleman had made observations that night with respect to him (Lord J. Rus. sell) and the other members of the Cabinet as reasons why the Bill should not be allowed to proceed further in the present session. At those observations he (Lord John Russell) had been greatly surprised, because the Bill in its present state had been supported not only by Lord Lyndhurst and Lord Brougham, but by the majority of the Peers in that House ; and, such being the case, he had hoped that the Right Hon. Gentleman would not have pursued the course be had taken by continuing his 43 1 3 1 0 051ti0u to the tuemure. The Right Hon, Gentleman had said that he (Lord John Ifussell) had net gone on with extreme diligence with respect to this measure. That was very easily said, but it must be recollected, that considering that the Army Estimates, and several other questions of importance had to be discussed, as much of the time of the House as could well be spared had been given to the subject. The Right Hon. Gentleman he stated that with regard to the administration of jus tice, there was no necessity whatever for the measure coming into operation before the month of October. Now, for his own part, he thought it would be a matter of extreme convenience that the whole provisions of the Bill should be well understood, that all the appointments under it should be made, and every arrangement per fected, in order that when the Courts met in Michaelmas Term, Counsel and all parties should understand the course they had to pursue. By that means every ar rangement might be made with regard to the sitting of the different Courts, and the legal business of the country placed upon a proper footing. The Right Honourable Gentleman had stated freely and frankly that his object in moving the introduction of the present clause, was not for the purpose of expediting the administration of justice, but because he thought that as the House had passed a vote of no con fidence in Ministers, that therefor.: they were not fit per sons—that the Lord Chancellor was not a fit person, to make the appointments which were contemplated by the Bill. He (Lord John Russell) could not assent to such reasons. It was impossible that he should assent to such grounds without admitting, which he could not admit, that no appointments ought to be made by any Member of the present Ministry because the Right Hon. Gentle man opposite, the Member for Tamworth, had obtained a vote from that House of want of confidence by a majority of one. He denied the authority of the vote to prevent the Ministry proceeding in its usual course, unless that vote was backed by the opinion of the country.—(Hear, hear.) Why, he would ask, should it be said or in sinuated that the Lord Chancellor, because he might be might be about to retire from office, was unfit to nomi nate individuals to office under the Bill ? He thought that the course which the Lord Chancellor had hitherto pursued had shown a determination on his part not to appoint individuals to unnecessary offices, and as an in stance of that—as an instance of the desire on the part of the Lord Chancellor not to avail himself of the exer cise of the patronage he possessed, he might refer to the cases of Mr. Justice Erskine, and Sir George Rose. In both those cases the Lord Chancellor considering the appointments which those learned gentlemen held to be unnecessary, refrained from ap pointing any successors to them. Such being the con duct of the Lord Chancellor, he would ask whether the Right Hon. Gentleman was justified in coming forward and placing every obstacle in his power to the further proceeding with a Bill for the better administration of the justice of the country, and at the same time to en deavour, if possible, to fix a stigma upon the Lord Chan cellor, because it was thought probable that he would shortly retire from office?—(Hear, hear.) The Right Hon. Gentleman, with the candour for which he was eminent, had not veiled the purpose he had in view in pursuing the course he had done. He had stated that his reasons for proposing the clause was, that the House had come to a vote of a want of confidence in Ministers ; as he had said before, he consi dered the adoption of such a course totally uncalled for, as he felt convinced that the Lord Chancellor, in any recommendations he might make, would be guided alone by a desire for the pure administration of justice.— (Cheers.) He could only look upon the clause pro posed by the Right Hon. Gentleman as one, the object of which was to declare that Lord Cottenham was totally unfit to make any recommendations for the appointment of officers under the Bill.—(Cries of " No, no.") That must be meaning of the Right Hon. Gentleman..—(Cries of " No.") What else could it be ? `The effect of the interposition of the Right Honourable Gentle man's clause was that which he had stated, a determination to say that the present Lord Chancellor was not fit to dispose of the appoint ments which would be given to that high legal officer by the Bill. The present Noble Lord who filled that office had been respected by the country for the impartial man ner in which he had administered justice in the disposal of every cause which had come before him, and the clear and lucid nature of the judgments that he had given ; and yet a Learned Judge who had so acted, and who was so respected by the country, was to be con demned in the House of Commons, because, on a party question, the other side of the House had gained a temporary victory by a majority of one. Upon this ques tion he (Lord J. Russell) must defer to the opinion of the House, but he would never allow the name of the Lord Chancellor to be branded with odium. Mr. RICHARDS said that he believed the appoint ments which the Lord Chancellor had made in the Chancery and the Exchequer, had given general satis faction to the profession. He had come down to the House that night prepared to vote against the proposi tion of his Right Hon. Friend the Member for Ripon, because he thought its effect might be to throw the Bill over altogether, but as he now found that the proposition was only to postpone the appointment of the new Vice- Chancellor, he did most cordially support it. Sir R. PEEL said that if the Lord Chancellor was obstructed in the exercise of the legal patronage of the Government by an Address to the Crown, he should con sider that as implying distrust in the great officer, and he could not consent to it. But he thought that there ;vas a clear distinction between refusing to be a party to any arrangement that implied confidence in the Govern ment, and that of distrusting one of its highest officers. In the present case he considered there was a great ju dicial arrangement under consideration.--(Hear.) The Executive Government, had been shown not to possess that confidence of the House of Commons. It was true that the Noble Lord had said that the next Parliament was to decide whether the present Government was to re main in pow",,r or not, and such being the case, he thought, when ". great judicial arrangement was wider consideration, it was inconvenient for the House,' placed as it trim was, to proceed with it. He thought the best 'course would be that the present Bill should be withdrawn ; and if the Noble Lord on the meeting of a new Parliament should find himself in a condition to carry on the affairs of the country, then he (Sir IL Peel) should have no objection to support him in the Present measure, and thereby all imputations upon t h e I,:d Chancellor would be prevented. " He (Sir R. Peel) disc..gimed any intention of making any personal attack upon the Lord Chancellor, and he thought, con sidering all the cir, umstanees of the case, that the course he had pointed out wa.: the best that could be pursued. •he Noble Lord would post- He hoped, therefore, that and bring it in in pone the Bill for the present 617 4 5 i ", was in a c: edition to carry on the next if he found he the Government, and then he could assn: e- him that he should have his support. The Noble Lora, however, must not charge him (Sir R. Peel) with obstructing their great judicial improvement. Mr. LABOUCHERE said he did not rise to express any opinion as to the course which it was advisable to take with regard to this Bill, but to protest against the doctrine of the Right Hon. Gentleman, which he re garded as at once novel, dangerous, and unconstitutional. —(Hear, hear.) He looked upon the motion as intended to deprive the Ministers, for the time being, of the pa tronage which was usually enjoyed by the Government. —(Hear ' hear.) He would not enter into any defence of the Lord Chancellor, believing that his character did not need vindication.—(Hear.) Sir E. SUGDEN explained. His Right Hon. Friend said he had not the slightest intention of casting any reflection upon the Lord Chancellor. Mr. HUME said it seemed to him, looking at both sides of the House, that the question was, who should have the appointment of the Judges.—(Hear, hear.) The Hon. Gentleman who had proposed the amendment, might have saved himself a great deal of trouble by tell ing them that on the 4th of Octoberhe expected his party to be in power, and he wished the appointment to be postponed to that period.—(Hear, and a laugh.) It was obvious that there was no analogy between this case and that of the Corn-laws. The question had not yet been discussed, and upon it there existed great difference of opinion, whilst the Bill before the House was admitted by every one to be a fit and proper measure. They had been told that this was not a question of party. Did party ever appear in a stronger light ?—(Hear, hear.) de admitted that there had been a majority of one against the Government, but although a majority on that particu lar vote, it was not a majority of the House. What would the Hon. Baronet have said had the opposition taken such a course when he held the reins of office ? (Hear, hear.) The plain truth was, that the present Government would have the nomination, and the Lord Chancellor would have the recommendation of the proposed Judges. Thpse who now stood in the way of justice opposed the Bill in order to secure the patronage. That was the fact, and it would be much better to admit ' it.—(Hear, hear.) He hoped the Noble Lord would take the sense of the House on the clause. Strangers were then ordered to withdraw and the House divided, when there appeared— For Sir E. Sugden's amendment lOl Against it Bl Majority —lB On our return to the gallery we found Lord J. RUSSELL declaring that he was sorry to differ from the opinions of the majority of the House, but he could not consent to be a party to proceeding with the Bill as amended.—(Hear, hear.) He should, therefore, move that the further considera tion of the Report be postponed to that day three weeks. Sir E. SUGDEN disclaimed all intention of casting any imputation on the conduct of the Lord Chancellor. Sir DE LACY EVANS said that the Bill was to be postponed for three or four months, merely for the pur pose of exercising patronage. He hoped that that would go forth to the public. It should be marked in that House, as it would be elsewhere, that this Parliament, which was declared to be a monopolist Parliament— (Conservative cheers) —had also given the present fur ther proof of flagrant partizanship. Lord STANLEY said he could not let the speech of the gentleman who had just sat down pass without ob servation. The effect .of the vote which had just taken place, had it not been for the course which it was thought right by the Government to pursue, would not have for a single instant post poned the beneficial operation of the Bill. The Act could not, for any beneficial purpose, come into operation previous to the Ist of November next, and, by the amend ment which had just taken place, it had been decided that the persons in whom the appointment of the judicial officers should be vested, should be the Government of the day, by whomsoever the Government of the day was conducted ; and by the 14th of October , a fort night before th Bill could possibly come into opera tion, her Majesty's Government, the Government on the other side of the House, without one word of oppo sition, or a single day' s d e l ay , would have exercised the power which Ministers of the Crown ought to do with both sides of House, a power recognised by making those judicial ap pointments, loner previous to the time when the country could obtain benefit from the operation of the Bill. The House had thought otherwise ; those functions of the Executive Government would be exercised by Mini sters who were at the present moment in abeyance — (Conservative cheers)... 'ho were holding office under a conditional resignation, until a decision was come to whether they were fit to carry en the Government. or not. It was the Noble Lord's own doing, and no one else's, if the cottntry . sustisined the least delay, impedi ment, or difficulty in obtaining the benefits that would arise from this Bill. Notwithstanding the steps taken by the Noble Lord, supposing a new Parliament was called together at the time it was expected, lie would yet have time to introduce - a new Bill, precisely in the terms of the present Bill, and if he was then the Minister of the Crown, he had the undisputed power of the appoint ments to those judicial offices. Mr. LABOUCHERE said that the speech of the Noble Lord only confirmed the impression on his mind, that the decision of the House established a principle equally novel and unconstitutional. He begged to state that Hon. Gentlemen on the other side of the House had not justified their course in the present case by adducing one precedent. He heard with regret the speech of the Right Hon. Baronet the Member for Tam worth on this subject. It was at variance with the opinions which he had heard the Right Hon. Baronet uniformly maintain on those subjects. Mr. VILLIERS said it had been stated by the Noble Lord (Lord Stanley) that no inconvenience would arise to the public from the postponement of the measure. Lord STANLEY—By the amendment. Mr. VILLIERS—The object' of the amendment was to prevent the Bill coming into operation; and did the Noble Lord mean to reconcile the public by stating that no inconvenience would arise from the Bill being with drawn ? The complaint of the public was the positive denial of justice, and when they w,re on the eve of having a Bill passed to remedy the grievance complained of, the'Bill was to be postponed for the purpose of allow ing the party who might be hereafter in power exer cising patronage. The public had more right to feel aggrieved at this than at any other act of party. Mr. PEMBERTON.said the public had a right to feel aggrieved ; but with which party did the blame rest ? He was as anxious as any one that this Bill should pass, but had Gentlemen on the other side of the House always exhibited anxiety on this subject?" From 1836, when the King declared that the first duty of the Sovereign was to forward the speedy administration of justice, to 1840, no step whatever had been taken by the Gentlemen on the other side to remedy the evils which it was now sought to put an end to. The Bill provided not only for the appointment of Judges, but of registrars and other officers, none of whom could be appointed before the month of August, and the• Court would not come into operation until No vember. The clause would not delay the operation of the Bill for a single hour, but the proposition of the Noble Lord would. When complaints were made as to its not passing in the Parliament, they should recollect that whatever responsibility there was, attached to the Noble Lord. Mr. WAKLEY thought the Noble Lord could not have acted otherwise than he had done ; he was anxious that it should be known that these violent attacks upon the .prerogative came not from the Radical party.— (Cheers.) The Radical party had never made any proposals affecting the Royal prerogative, as had been made in that House during the last three weeks.—(Hear, hear.) If these proceedings con tinued, the days of the Monarchy were numbered The people were discontented at being unrepresented. When the people came to the House, merely asking for their merciful interference with the executive Govern ment and the Crown, they were told by both sides of the House not to interfere with the Royal prerogative. Such was the language of the Right Hon. Baronet the Member for Tamworth—(Loud cheers)—but when the interests of party were concerned, then the prerogative was a shuttlecock, and to be considered of no more value than a stone in the street.--(Loud cheers.) He, as a Radical Reformer, while he was anxious for a more extended representation of the people, was also anxious to uphold the Royal prerogative. He had never coun tenanced any attacks on that prerogative, but he must say, that he thought the example set by the majority of that House in their recent attacks on that prerogative, would be one of fearful import if Hon. Gentlemen op posite did not speedily recover their senses. He did not charge Gentlemen with being actuated by improper mo tives, but he stated what was, in his opinion, th e in evitable consequence of the course which they had pursued. Sir R. PEEL thought that the real cause of what had happened was quite evident.—(Hear, hear.) The cause of it was neither more nor less than the attempt of Mi nisters to carry on the Goverment without the confidence of the House.—(Opposition cheers.) There had clearly been no other course for the Government to pursue after the House of Commons had declared that they did not possess its confidence than either to resign or immediately to dissolve the present Parliament. By an immediate Dissolution he did not mean a dissolution without the ne cessary grants to carry on the public service. He did not mean a dissolution without those legis lative Acts which would enable them to levy the usual duties ; but he should say that no contested motion of any kind whatever—that no Act of the House of Commons which implied its confidence in the Ministry, should have been proposed. Their present embarrassment arose from their anomalous, and extraordinary, and unparalled position, they being placed in a minority on the vote of confidence, and yet coming and asking the House for a fresh demonstration of confi dence and they might depend upon it, it was impossible that a Government could go on upon such a principle.— (Hear, hear.) The proposed devolution of power would imply confidence ; and if they had passed that Act, would not Honourable Gentlemen oppo site be themselves the first to turn round and tell them that such a proceeding was inconsistent with the vote they had come to on Friday night ? for he re peated that it would be a demonstration of confidence to give Ministers the authority to make great judicial ar rangements. He was perfectly confident that they would 'iave been taunted with inconsistency by Hon. Gentle men opposite, who would not have drawn a distinction between the ordinary constitutional and legitimate pre rogatives of the -Crown, and the powers conferred for the first time by a legislative Act, to which the House of Commons must be a party. There was clearly a distinction between devolving new prerogatives upon the Crown and respecting those which it possessed ; and they might depend upon it that if this precedent was adopted, that a Government being not only in a minority in the House, and unable to carry as principles,. but not having the confidence of the House of Commons, should ask for a new demonstration of con fidence ; but then, depend upon it, that the House would not consent to such a course. They could no do it with consistency. Hon. Gentlemen opposite complained of the attempt on the part of the House to interfere with the prerogatives of the Crown. Now, they should also claim the prerogatives of the House of Commons.—(flear, hear.) They claimed for the House a perfect right to consider legislative measures—they claimed the perfect right, when en Act was proposed to them to enable the Government to make an appointment on the 15th of August, to say whether the 15th of October should not be inserted in its stead in the Bill. It was a perfectly new doctrine to maintain that the House of Commons was not com pletely at liberty, with respect to mere legislative enact ments, to exercise its own discretion ; and so far from thinking that the Monarchy would thereby be placed in the slightest danger, if that was really the opinion of the Hon. Gentleman opposite, he (Sir R. Peel) did not re collect a time when a higher prerogative was claimed for the Crown than that the House of Commons should not have the power of considering a legislative mea sure submitted to its decision, and of substituting the 15th of October for the 15th of August. No man could contend more strenuously for the le gitimate prerogative of the Crown than he would do ; but if a Government, not having the con fidence of the House of Commons, should attempt to conduct the administration of affairs, they might de pend upon it that they would be obstructed, that they would be thwarted, and if the prerogatives of the Crown did in that case sustain any injury, it was not because the majority in the House of Commons claimed for the House its due privileges, but the fault lay entirely with those who, being Ministers of the Crown, did not do ho mage to the principles of representative Government, but continued not only to administer executive functions, but to propose to the House legislative Acts which would imply a vote of confidence in them.—(Hear.) Mr. HAWES said it would have been much better on the part of Hon. Gentlemen opposite, when the Bill was announced to the House, to say at once that they would not proceed with a legislative measure. They had clone no such thing, however. They consented to everything contained in the Eaeasure, but they scrambled for the pa tronage. He had never witnessed a more shabby pro ceeding in that House. Mr. B. WOOD put it to the Right Hon. Gentleman opposite whether the people of England would not call into question the integrity of the Judges, while they saw two great parties contending for their appointment ? The Bill was then withdrawn. The Banks of Issue Bill then passed through Com mittee. DEBTS OF PARISHES BILL. On the motion that this Bill be committed. Mr. FOX MAULE objected to proceeding any farther with this Bill. . Sir E. KNATCHBULL believed the Bill was satis factory to all the parties concerned, and therefore he hoped the Hon. Gentleman would allow the Bill to go on. Mr. DARBY hoped the Bill would be allowed to pro ceed, for he knew several gentlemen who with disinte rested motives had advanced money to different parishes. Mr. FOX MAULE objected to the Bill without fur ther explanation for the lion. Member on the subject. Mr. B. WOOD wanted to know what these debts were. It was not fair to saddle the present rate-payers with debts of a hundred years' standing. He should move that the Bill be committed that day three weeks. Mr. DARBY said the rate-payers could not be bound unless the parishes had acknowledged the debt. Mr. WARBURTON thought the House ought not to legislate on a subject affecting numerous parishes on the mere statements of individual Members. The subject ought to be investigated before a Committee before the Bill was entertained. Sir EDWARDKNATCHBULL explained. He had been in communication with the parties Concerned—he had been in communication with the Poor-law Commis sioners, and all were agreed as to the necessity of the measure. He knew several cases of great hardship, which called for some such measure as the present for their relief—cases in which parties had lent money to parishes to enable them to establish their legal claims to properties, when the parishes, by the aid of such money, had do ne so , a nd were, at the present mo ment, in the en j o y men t of the property so acquired ; and yet, according to the opinions of the Poor-law Com- , naisstoners, it was not competent, under the Poor-law Act, for such parishes to pay either the principal or in terest of such moneys out of the rates. It was fur these reasons that he wished to press the Bill. Mr. HAWES opposed the Bill. After some further conversation, the debate was, by consent, adjourn e d till F r iday. (No. )Bill was read a The Metrop o li s I mprov ements second time. then disposed of, -Ate other Orders of the Day were and the 11911,5 0 gdiourued at One o'clock. TIM SUN; LONDON. THMISTIAY, JUN P 10. 1 41. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, JnYze 9. THE CASE OF THE DEAN Of YORK. The arguments in the case of the Dean of York were resumed this morning, Sir Wm. Follett appearing in support of the rule, which had been obtained for the prohibition. The Learned Counsel was followed by Mr. Cresswell and Dr. Adams on the same side, and the case had not terminated when the Court rose. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HOUSE. In the course of the last week the Lord Mayor received the following letter, on a subject which his Lordship said hr con sidered to be one of paramount interest to those who send their children to France to be educated i— tt My Lord,—The friends of several youths who were sent to France for their education are desirous to lay before your Lordship the subjoined statement, with the accompanying me morandum, in order that, with your Lordship's permission, it may be publicly read at the Mansion-house, as a caution to parents against intrusting their children to the tender care of French advertising schoolmasters. To substantiate the truth of the statement, your Lordship is respectfully referred to the parties whose names are below, and the boys oho have written the memoranda appended hereto will, if required, attend your Lordship, to verify all they have asserted, and make such further explanation as may be deemed necessary." An exposu e of the infamous establishment to which refer ence is made will, perhaps, conduce to correct similar abuses elsewhere, and be a just infliction on the impostor who, by false pretences, succeeded in deluding many anxious parents, and formed a school wherein ill-treatment, hunger, and misery, were the chief, and nearly the only lessons that were taught by him. The persons to be referred to who had eons at the school are, Mr. John Forrester, Police 'Court, Mansion House (one boy), Mr. James Earp, 156, Fleet-street (two boys), Mr. Thompson, 15, Queen's-row, Pentonville (one boy), Mrs. Wilson, 3, Vauxhall-place, South Lambeth (two boys), Mr. Ruthven, of the Bow-street office (two boys). The following is the statement, which will strongly bring to mind the dew: iption given by the immortal Boz of the doings in a Yotkehire seminar y. A FRENCH DO-THE-BOYS HALL.—At about five miles from Boulogne-ser-bier, is the academy of Monsieur de Bree, known also as the "Chateau de la Capelle," a large ancient house, situated in grounds of a very picturesque and enchanting appearance. Monsieur de Bri eis a single e s ntleman, who has raised a school by periodically visiting London and advertising in the public journals, soliciting parents to submit their chil dren to his care and educational instruction, promising every attention to their intellectual improvement, the culti vation of their morals, and their domestic comforts. Till within a few weeks of the present date, the establishment he had succeeded in thus forming, con sisted of English and American youths. In his circular M. de Bree set forth that he professed to take the whole re sponsibility of their education by his own arduous and undi vided exertions for the proficiency of his pupils, rather than to risk the negligence of tutors, while the domestic arrange ments of his household were committed to the anxious and motherly superintendence of his revered parent. Lulled by the speciousness of tiie charlatan, parents eagerly embraced an opportunity to sera their boys to be advanced in the French language at an establishment apparently so com fortable arid within so short a distance from London, where they easile imagined a weekly correspondence could be had with their children. Mr. John Forrester, of the Mansion-house police establish ment, having some business at Boulogne, made a hasty visit to his son, who was one of Monsieur de Bree's pupils. The fa ther was so shocked at the child's appearance, and at the report the boy gave of the treatment the pupils received from Monsieur de Bree and his mother , that he immediately removed the lad, and with him his friend Mr. Ruthven's two sons, who had been sent to the school by his recommendation. He brought his son home, and called on the parents of some of the other boys, to state his reasons for removing the boy from the academy. Two sons of Mr. Earp, of Fleet-street, being at the school, Mrs. Earp, upon being informed that they were subjected to a starvation diet and cruel treatment. hastened to Boulogne, for the purpose of either satisfying herself of the incorrectness of the report, or to bring her sons home. On her arrival at the Chateau de la Capeile, she was not admitted beyond the large hall, and she there had an interview with Monsieur de Bree and his mother. She found her children half famishing, and from being of strong and robust appearance on their leaving home nine months pre viously, both were now thin and emaciated, having- also lost their former flow of spirits, and become afflicted with a harsh rush all over the surface of the skin. One of them had had a sore foot for four months without any attention being paid to it by Madame de firm On complaining of the situation in which she foetid the boys, and referring to the hearty and healthful condition 'hey exhibited at the time they joined the academy, Madame de Bree, in an emphatic manner, declared that all English b-tys were in a rotten and vulgar state, from repletion, and their unhealthy flesh i equired to be reduced by a spare diet. Mss. Earp brought her sons home, and from them learned that the boys were seldom indulged with meat at a meal, and that whenever it was allowed the quantity was con fined to scarcely two ounces each, Thirty pounds of flour weekly supplied the whole establishment with bread and pies. At breakfast a cup of bran tea, unsweeta ed, and two thin slices of bread formed the meal. Eight or nine hours after, a few potatoes sufficed for dinner, and no supper was allo wed at all, there being no servant, male or female, or occasional helper of any kind. The boys were compelled to become cooks, bakers, butchers, porters, field-labourers, gardeners, ostlers, cow-boys, housemaids, scullery maid:, and, in 'sine, to perform all the drudgery of the establishment. The chateau being of large dimensions, 11?, of the room: were unoccupied: neither these nor those tenanted were ever cleaned. Clean sheets to the beds were too refined a luxury to be indulged in fre quently; and during nine months, at is solemnly as serted, that those essentials to comfort were only changed once. Water was brought from a distance by the boys (by yoke and pails), and then carefully locked up from their use. A slight complaining by any of the boys was imme diately silenced by severe chastisement and starvation. k fedi eine, of which there was always abundance, was carefully in troduced whenever meats were short, and to a singular insi net Nlatiame de Bree readily discerned which of the boys would be benefited by being well dosed ftr the day, in i sreference to their taking a mccl During the late severe winter fires were seldom allowed, but the boys were can-trained to gambol in an underground stone kitchen without fog I for ten or twelve hours together to warm themsavee. Sometimes they were sent out to gather stic'es to kindie a fire with, wh t h aeterwards were very sparingly used. By neglect arid want of cleanliness many boys contracted very bad chdblains—some were confined to their beds by the ulcerations which supervened. Several front this cause were for months unable to at end to their ordinary occupatit ris, and althoueh c'aitnieg the sympathy of Mims. de Bree and his mother, were (retmently s verely bsaten while in bed tor presuming to comp'ain. It is diffiettit to e inceive that the boys could no communicate their miseries to their parents. Let it be remembered that the chateau was five miles from Boulogne ; that the watchful eye of Monsieur de Bree and his mother prevented any attempt on the part of the boys to correspond, excepting under their dictation, and that any in fringement of their rules was net by certain and severe punish ment arid starvation. Although three cows were kept, the boys did not benefit by that circumstance. Bran tea, in an unsweetened state, and slightly coloured will milk being the only beverage allowed. The boys were actuaily employed to slaughter, skin, and dress a calf, the entrails of which were afterwards baked in a pie atid brought to table for several successive days. Monsieur de Bree also kept a pony and phaeton, which were looked after by the bevs; and occasionally, when he drove his mother out, the lito3s were made to follow 'or many miles on foot. Those who were unable to do so by reason of their bad feet, were shut up in a room till their return. One little fellow who, from being a strong stout boy, had dwindled by excessive bad treatment to a mere skeleton, and was so weak as to be scarcely able to walk—was °!t• n subjected to the mote cruel treatment in being besten, cuffed, and made sport of to amuse the other boys. A surgeon's certificate, appended hereto, will show the condition in which this youth was brought home; and the statements of four of the boys, also appended, will evidence the cruelty, starvation, and misery to which the whole school was so shamefully and inhumanly subjected. Thu pro spectus issued by Monsieur de llree pretended to a pecu liarly happy method of instruction to his pupils, by which emulation - .vas made to be the chief' incentive to their intellec tual exertions ; yet it appears there were no regular school hours,—that Monsieur de &cc rarely or scarcely ever heard the boy 3 their lessons, but that t ach repeated them to the other ; so that, in fact, no improvement could fairly prig' es:. An imposition, therefore, in evety instance, as gross as it im pudent, has been practised by Monsieur de Bree, the expo.i tion of which, it is hoped, will deprive him of all future support in this country, and operate as a caution to parents in sending children to France for their edecatirie, without previously making all necessary inquiries as to the character of the eve. blishment which they may select. The following list exhibits the names of the boys still remaining at the school, and of those who have been brought home since the discovery by their pa rents of the inhumanity practised at the Chateau de la Ca pelle noYS.RROUGHT AWAY FROM CHATEAU DE LA CAPEILE George Forrester, son of Mr. John Forrester, Mansion ' house Police. Thomas Ruthven and Henry Ruthven, sons of Mr. Ruthven, of Bow-street Police Court. Thomas Earp and James Earp, sans of Mr. Earp, 156, Fleet-street. Charles Wilson and John Wilson, sons of Mrs. Wilson, 3, Vauxhall-place. South Lambeth. William Cooper, son of Mr. Casper, of Mount Hotel, Lower Grosvenor-street. Henry P. Griggs, son of Mrs. Thompson, 15, Queen's-row, Pentonville. Henry W. Style, son of Mrs. Style, Thorp Perron, Berlale, Yorkshire. LEFT AT SCHOOL AFTER THE REMOVAL OF THE BOYS ABOVE NAMED. THE RESIDENCES OF THE FRIENDS OF THESE YOUTits ARE NOT KNOWN. Charles Cruchley, William Cruchley, and George Cruchley, Americans. George Michael Nasmyth, son of Lady Nasmyth. James Hoare. William Gough. The documents herewith in confirmation of the foregoing statement are the statement of H. P. Griggs, and a Snrgeo i's certificate (A and B), the statement of H. W. Style, and hie mother's letter (C and D), the statement of Thomas Earp (E), and the statement of Charles Wilson (F). (A. ) I have been as pupil with Al. de Bree for one year and ten months ; for the first twelve months we were treated very well, and during that time AI de Bree attended to out studies, asd on my visiting my parents at Midsummer le4o, in answer to their inquiries, I informed them I was very comfortable, and expressed my willingre-s to return with Ai. de three, as my parents seemed much pleased with my improvement in French, &c. On my return to the school M. de Bree for two or three weeks paid his usual attention, but we soon found a great falling off in our diet and other comforts, and by our taking notice of it, either by word or ac tion, we were severely beaten, and otherwise th treated. Our breakfast consisted of bran tea, and two slices of bread, with hardly any butter ; we then dined at three or four o'clock, and had a very small piece of meat and potatoes, not half sufficient to satisfy our hunger, but we dare net complain, as, in that case, we were dreadfully beaten. As the cold weather ap proached, our lessons were neglected, and we were sent to pick up wood for eur scanty fire ; our ate sh.ng also was much neglected, and from being exposed to flirts and cold, I had chil- Wain: in my feet, as well as many others, and on our complaining, we were beaten an.l shut up in a room with scarcely any focol; what we had was bran tea and potatoes, without Any meat. In c nsequence of want of food and ill treatment, I was unable, from weakness arid sore feet, to stand. I was then entirely confined to my room for fair months. Mad. de Bree visited me, and threw two or three dry potatoes into my bed, without salt, or a knife to peel them. And as my feet were now so bad I could hardly crawl, when I wished them to be looked at or dressed, Mad. do Bree would beat me over nay head, call me dreadful names, and say she had no time to dress my rotten feet. 1 slept on a very hard mate ass with hardly any cover ing, and the sheets were torn and very old ; they were not washed for many weeks, and in consequence of the discharge from my feet the smell wan very offensive. For many days together I was not allowed any water to wash my hands and face, as I was not able to procure it myself ;" ahnost every time I was visited by Mons. or Aladame de lirec, 1 was beaten or. called bad names. A few dais before my coming home, they stood over me, anti made me write to my parents, stating I was well, happy, and com fortable, and had every thing I could wish for; this was done _,. . • MoTtNIN'G EDIV:(2)1: • when I could not stand for my sore feet. I was so weak from .hunger my bones were nt , arly hrough my skin ; myself and the other boys often ate the cabbage-leaves, hems, and other refuse left by the cows—in fact I cannot state all the ha , dships, ill-treatment, and hunger, we have undergone, all of which will be corrobor a t e d b y t h e ot h er b oys ; and had not 1k Ir. For rester and Mrs. Earp witnessed our sufferings, and taken us to our friends, we must have starved. We have all endeavoured to write secretly to our friends, but could not get an opportunity, as we had no servant, and were not allowed to speak to any person visiting the house. At the time I write this lam still confined to my bed, although I have had the greatest care and nourishing food from my dear mother for the last ten day's, and the kind attention of Dr. Symes, her medical adviser, who has visited me every day; his certificate will testify the state in- which he found me. The pocket-money I had given me by any parents, amounting to 14s. 6d., was, on my return to school, taken from me by M. de Bree, and he has scarcely allowed me any part of it to spe,d, be sides charging 3s. per quarter for spending money. We dare not ask fur it for fear of being beater.. We were all very much afraid of Madame de Bree, as when we showed discontent, she would beat and starve us, so we were obliged to submit to her cruel treatment. I hope Mons. and Madame de Bree's cruel treatment to me may be made public, so that it may prevent other boys from experiencing the hunger and hardships I have endured. HENRY PHILIP GRIGGS. 15, Queen's-row, Pentonville: I omitted to say that the day I came away, a straw bed e as prepared for me in a loft. (B•) I hereby certify that Master Grig,g's hea'th when he re turned from M. de Beee's school was most deplorable ; aris ing, in my opinion, from want of nourishment and cleanliness, and had he remained much longer, I have no doubt his life would have been sacrificed. WILLIAM SYMES, Surgeon, &c. Tavistoek-square, May 21, 1841. (C.) I have been to school at M. de Bree's Chateau de la Capelle, Boulogne-sur-Mer, and during my stay there have suffered all sorts of ill-treatment. 1 have been there a quarter of a year, and have only had meat to my dinner, and butter on my bread for three weeks out of that time. I have suffered se verely from hunger, as she used to give me a thin slice of dry bread for breakfast, and a quarter of a pint of bran tea; at dinner she gave me four little potatoes, and ro meat, nor anything to drink. At tea I had another thin slice of bead and the same quantity of bran tea, being a space of eleven or twelve hours without anything to drink, and they would not allow us to drink water; the water was locked up. He has not heard me one lesson since I have been there, but he used to make me work in the fields, stable, or garden. Thirty pounds of flour u-ed to last sixteen of us a week, be sides the master and mistress. We had to go and wash our selves in a cave (we were naked all but our trousers) in the depth of winter, and . the water froze on us, and consequently we had dreadful chilblains. We then had less to eat, and she told us we were rotten. We had to work on a Sunday the same as any other day. He took all our pocket-money from us, and would not. allow us to keep it. The bedlooms have not been cleaned since I have been there, and the sheets on my bed have nut been changed, and they were not clean when I went there. We were not al lowed to speak to one another. My band is very bad with chil blains, and I cannot write like I used to. He would not let us write home what we liked, he made us say we were well treated. We had a calf which was d3ing from cold and starvation, and we were obliged to kill it and skin it ourselvi s with our penknives ; and we had a pie of the entrails, the inside of the head, and the ayes, which lasted for nine days. She has hardly any furniture in the house, which was very large and always dirty ; there being no servimt,either male or femme. There were only us, Monsieur de l3ree, and an old woman whom he called his mother, and who took pleasure in ill treating us, and sometimes she beat me with her thick walk ing -stick on my chilled hands till the skin came off, for not going to work soon enough. The house was five mites from Boulogne, and there was no means of communicating with any person. WILLIAM HENRY STYLE. (D.) Dear Sir,—Words will not convey my gratitude and thank fulness to you for the rescue of my dear child from worse than the jaws of death--the pangs of hunger. The spontaneous act does honour to your feelings and heart, and may the blessing of that God which is promised he upon you and yours for the assistance which you nave given to the desolate and the orphan in the hour of need. Be assured it is a debt which will ever remain on my memory, and I trust my child's also ; and I hope to know your dear boys will soon be restored to e mvaleseence under the judicious and careful treat ment of Mrs. Earp, as it wi,l require the greatest care, after such cruel abstinence, ere their digestion can be brought to its proper tone. With respectful compliments and thanks, both to Mrs. Earp and yourself, beliere me to remain Your grateful and obliged humble servant, Sharpe Terrace, May 5 Al STYLE. vou be good enough to let me know the pecu niary expense I am indebted to you. (E.) I have been at Mons. de Bree's nine months, and have ex perienced all kinds of bad treatment. The house was very large. and nearly without furniture ; it was also very dirty, as there was no servant, either male or female, and nobody in the house but us, de B ee, and a deerepid old woman be called his moiler, and who seemed to like to ill treat us. I had no- thin g for breakfast or supper but about two ounces o bread, and sometimes I had a little butter on it, wiih a cup of ban tea, and could not have any drink, not even water, between breakfast and supper, a space of 12 hours ; the water was even locked up. For dinner we had a few potatoes, and sometimes about an ounce and a ha f of meat, and nothing to drink. When we were going to write home, they made us a tart, which we had to mention in our letter. There were no regular school-hours, we used to work in the grounds like common labourers on Sun'aya as will as any other day. In winter we used to play at cards every eveniree even Sunday When we were in the house, de Bree never heard us our lessons. but we used to repeat them one to another. There were about thirty pounds of flour mads iiito bread every week for about sixteen of us, besides Monsieur and Mai:am, de Bret', and when there was not bread enough they gave us medieine, end kept us without. We were kept without fire (with the exceptien of two days) up to Chr:stmas Day, and the day after we weie kept in a cold damp, underground, paved kitchen, without tire or a place to sit upon, and were without food during ten hours. Every morning, in winter as wed as summer, we were ohiged to go nearly naked into an underground kitchen, to wit- h. We all washed in asot of trough, mate of stone, in the same water, which was often frozen, and which, when we had broken the ire, smelled very bad ; it was so cold that it froze to our hands, as we were nut allowed to dry them. We had to mike oot roan beds, and the sheets were changed but once write I was there ; the bedrooms also were never cleened ; and though there were twelve empty rooms, we occupied but two small ones; and Moss. and Ma - dame de Bree shpt together in another. We were only allowed to wadi our feet but once, and then it was in the dirty water the others had soaked their broken chilblains in. When they had a half-starved which was dying of cold and disease, de line stuck it, and • we had to help to skin it with our penknives, and to eat part of it next day ; she made a pie of the entrails and head, which lasted us nine days, during which time we had no other meat, and were so hungry we chewed even the bones. When we had chilblain( we had physic nearly every lemming ; one thin slice of dry bread. and half a cup of bran tea fur breakfast ; three or four small potatoes for dinner, and no sup per. I was not allewed to steak to my youeger brother. who told me when he used to give the cows their fond, he use i to eat the beans they left at the bottom of the pail. and when he came home his bones were nearly throiel his skin, and he eouid not sit without a pillow. When we used to go out for walks, Monsieur and Madame de Bree role and we used to follow on foot fus great distances. Aladame sometimes bought a small pi. cut it up among all of us, re serving of eourie nearly half for herself and Al. de Bree, cna made us pay about a penny each for about a mouthful, after which we had no other dinner. The haute was detached about five miles from any town, and when I contemplated my escape I found it impossible, as, if I had got out of the house, the gendarmes would have brought me back before I could have reached Boulogne, and as 'nobody ever came to the house, I had no means of letting anybody know how we were treated. May, 1841. THOMAS EA HP, 156, Fleet-street. (F.) I entered M. de Bree's silted, Chateau de la Capelle, Bou logne, July 14, 1840. From the beginning we had not suffi cient to eat, and were badly treated, kicked, and struck for the slightest offences. I was fund with a letter I had written home, saying how we were treated. M. de Bree followed me about, flogging me eith a whip of twelve thongs of leather, and shut. me up. During the winter we have only had fires on two or three ocea , ions, although it wan excessively cold : and were often sent siown into a cave ti:i dark, to keep us warm. I was confined in bed with bad feet for nearly four months. During that time I was never washed, nor had any change of linen. Every other d.-,y or so, I was obliged to go down to show my feet. when I was flogged and called names, till I confersed that it was my own fault that nay feet remained bad, having scratched them, or else they would have healed ; and that it was net for want of nourishment. But that was untrue; the confession was forced the iugh fear of punishment. Durieg the t rue I • ssas in bed I was neatly star veil. bri akfast iton-isted rut a thin slit of bread, and mil and water, and my (Onner twit or three dry potatoes, and sometimes a very small piece of meat, but very seldom I was fetched home by my mama, and still remain in a most emaciated state, and under medical treatment. My friends are all shocked at my miserable ap pearance. Indeed, lam not able to express halt the cruelties I have experienced. CII F.S WILSON, 3, Vauxl,ail-pla te, South Lambeth. The Loan MAvoit having requested the ateendsnee of Mr. Earp at the Mansion-house, that gentleman, and the parents of other children who had he n at the school, waited *Too hi; Lordship, and c (Armed the statement ; and his Lordship said that he eins.dereit :t to he his duty to make the atrocious cir cumstances as public as possible. FORGED FRENCEI TREASURY LS. A letter from Algiers, of the 26th ultimo, gives the fol'evr log details of the recent fraud committed by means of forged Treasury bills : " On the 22d, a Spanish schooner, viewed La Vierge de Regis, Captain Jose Maria de Otero, came into port from Al met ia, with a cargo of 2,0-0 qeintals of lead, consi2nei. to the Storekeeper-General of the Army. As no sticli officer exists the ship was immediately put under survenince, and a re port got abrea - t that her freight was the produce of fraud, through the means of forged bills. We have ic.irtit irsim good ' inhumation that the author of the fraud prevented kimself, severhl weeks ago, to the French Consuls of Spain, assum ing the 'Arne of tidy de Beaumont, and pretending to be a brother of M. Gustave tie Beaumont, the Deputy now at Algiers with M. de Tocqueville and M. de Corceiles, on.their return from Mostaganem, having apparently guess up their intention of accompanying the expedition against Ma6eara and Tekedempt. Ilely de Beaumont gave himself out to our consular agent in Spain as an officer of the milita r y adminis tration in Algeria, and produced a pretended letter from the Governor-General, charging him to make large purchases of lead for the army. All the Consuls of France at Valencia, Ma'aga, Gibraltar, and Cadiz, appear to have entertained no doubt of the authenticity of the later, or the reality of his mission, for they gave him successively letters of recom mendation. Cadiz and Gibraltar were the principal theatres of his frauds, and it. is !aid he issued his false bills at Gibral tar to th! amount of 200.000 f. At Cadiz the Vice-Consul in troduced him to sevm-al of the fi. st merchants, and through their mediation he obtained one-third of the lead now on board the detained ship. In one tr mutition, to the amount of 40,000 fr., he gave a bill for 50,000 fr., receiving the difference in money. Not the least striking part of the affair is, that there is every reason to believe that the lead thus a, quired was des tined for Abd-el-Kaler ; and thus the Frei.ch Consuls—un known to themselves, it is true—have been ma le accomplices in a fraud and an attempt to supply an enemy of their coantry with ammunition. It is confidently believed that the sh-p wa s on her way to Morocco, but was driven by stress of weather into Algiers." HUMOROUS TRANSLATION OF A MOTTO..-- The motto of Admiral Sir George Cockburn i 3 " Ita," which remimis us of an aneciote suitable for thc next edition of Joe I♦liFer. The latest scene of the gal.ent Advdt al's expl, its was the coast of America, in 1613 ; aid on a naval otli, er, mnre intimately acquainted with the <etvices ()V Sir Gecrge Cockburn than with Latin, being asked what " Ita" meant re plied, "Don't you know? It means I tank America,' " • SPANISH REGENCY. 'The Count de Parsent, major domo to his Royal H °lf Don Francisco de Paula, has sent the following, congratulation to the Secretary of State for Fo it on the nomination of Espartero, for the purpose dilag'°° presented to the Regent : h id so b' " As a Spaniard, as an Infant of Spain, as a d e r ) Th o is jeet to, and as the uncle of my beloved and illustrious woo, Donna Isabella 11., I have the pleasure of most cordldlY• gratulating the illustrious patriot, who, by the - stiPr. l3 itf of of the Cortes, has just been elevated to the high' ur,i;lof single Regent. It must be a great comfort to all Spn itu de as it is to m)self, to see the well-deserved proof of gl a! d d stinction with which the country has booour ed '' — h vi a solemn occasion, the invincible general, who, sfler. J o. saved it from the most horrid dynastieal war, time pre.erved its honour, its independence, its con' strtt o , its throne, its laws, and its liberty, from the gulP ll ,__ ° '.,,,,'• e tritote Ron. 'I he future welfare of the country, for the happy .pt which I have constantly prayed, appears to me under I,to to 'llo consoling and hopeful aspect. Its destiny being confioloo,ol genius sent by Providence to its assistance at the verY,.% op when destruction stared it in the face, peace, internal Lii!',„ o tke and complete administrative regularity will, thanks w o o powerful assistance granted by heaven, succeed to the u ness, division, and discouragement, which threaten dal" happy event, which premises to my country numero increased prosperity. a t the "I congratulate my fellow citizens, I rejoice for e l,i, ler idea that the illustrious Spaniard who has acted will alty during the civil war, and brought it to such a glorioloot mination, by directing our natio n al armies, will eq u ' lli • e 0 bspe how, at the bead of a generous people, to male to r ot of her brave sons, raising a wall of brass between,tbe P d and the past, confirming religiously the Constituton rete laws, giving stability to the throne of Isabella 0u `bet/ nally establishing national liberty and independence , have Leen the constant objects of my most ardent vri!"thoes i° feel the greatest pleasure in renewing the expression of pro. wishes, and I pray Heaven to p i e; e rve the ciAls, o d .oo/ tect the steps of the illustrious Duke, for the Welf ar " ° country and for his own glory. (Signed) "FRANCISCO ANTONIO, Infant of gh * si " Paris, May 21, I 1341." THE MARKETI,YESTERN,I CORN EXCHANGE. se with the vd The arrivals since Monday have been small, , Ili tion of Oats. The Wheat trade firm at last quotation elide little doing in Barley, Beans, and Peas. Oats ex,,.....treu l 0 10 in sale, and Monday's terms cannot be obtained. '" reported. NEWGATE AND LE ADENHALL A 4 10 The supplies of m ea t were good, the demand brisk se"6ol the same as last quoted. Poultry in fair supply, *b e ugs lively, but in prices no alteration was observable. 6 ,i, good supply, demand moderate, and prices 55. to 664 120, for English, and 4s. per dozen for Plovers. COLONIAL MARKET. ire The public sales were of little moment. ; by or e s ' the business done was on a small s ta l e , e i t her for b° lll ,, t elto port, and in several cases rathe r l ower ra t es were subto" The arrivals of produce were fair from roost parts. TEA MARKET. tit There was but a limited business transacted lo " — , o or Tea but holders were firm, and would not sell low Dvoatisit cash ' under 2s. 2d. per lb. The spe c ulative market but Company's Congou firm at 2s. 21d. cash. TALLOW MARKET. do Prices of Russian were supported. but the market "Id* both soap-makers and ' chandlers operating wit h sof P. Y. Candle on the 'pot, however, was not to be — 47107 465. 3d. and for delivery in less th an threemoot A was asked. INDIGO MARKET. kei ot/ ar Prices of East India did not g i ve \sa y, but the 3 3 1 4 00 1 dull, both shippers and the home:trade operating 'lt evil caution. The quantity that will b e offered at tnelicol quarterly sale is expected to be 10,000 chests, the small. 11. 6 6 Walls:End Hotspur ' ' 11 Walls End Killtnavio"• ' : Walls - End Witham ''''' a Walls - End Belmont , •'•• .. Walls End East Bettor' -"' Walls E n d Haswell....o•"‘ )1 End:Hedley ........ ti Wails End Hettoti.... ... .... Walls End Larobton...,:ts :4 Walls End Russell's re" gi Walls End Caradoe ..... al I Walls Et d Hat tlepool•••'. Wall: End Kelloe 0 Walls End Aclebidet•n7sery Walls End Browns Walls End Clarence 11. `" 1 0 0 Walls End Tees HetiOnt• JO Cowpcn . ........ . ......... . Halbeath ..................... COAL MARKET. Ships arrived since last market day, 4C. s. d. Adair's Bell, Robson & Co. Hartley 16 0 litaydon I%lain He()burn Main l7 0 I.lolywell Ma n P.' 0 kew Tanfield Moor IL 0 Old *lantield Moor l4 (1 Ord's ltedhugh l5 0 South Hartley l5 Smith's Pont,l) l4 0 "ratified Moor Bute's l6 West Wylam ........ . 16 0 West Hartley Walls lad Bell and Brown IR 1, Nails E d ewic e and C Walls End Brown's' l6 Walls Emil Clennell Wails End .losio th Walls End Heston IS Walls End Hilda . 17 6 :k ending Ss 8 •0 A IRISH MARKETS. DUBLIN MARKET NOTE for the Wool From To 28 0 3 4 00 14 0 10 0 11 ti I 14 g g it 0 562 kVheat,per barrel •zt 0 Sere ........ 16 sto'se 418 itarley 513 this '4 strut...." o Pour, per cwt. 2::6 Oatmeal -- N atone.... Sold to Bakers only. 130 9,96'8 Cwt. Flour 10 0 24 11 .a. 1111 Average pric e 14 . heat snit 'lour 51: 9d Pe,,r, - GI Receipts of }our, 11,69 7"." - . front 2-8. . to Nv o i front 17 s. Salo., of Do. t0 i 11.,;t4 T -- ••••-•' U,L .ircU from PitICS taltirgn. ••• 4 Quarter,: Loa! 9cl. -lc ati that tern g CORI% MARKETS-June 5 d. 1 Whez '.lost.)2`, of Lc 335. 0 i.juut, per list.... 4, ilarlty (per 16s 1 .)1. 0 13 Ift tot- (per cwt ti od Oatireal ;per ed to 16i ed are, 4d. to 7.1.- Nluttito, stt. ',ft, -. Veal, td .0 vcric..4,l. to Sd. -ft resh litotes 10d. lid Pe'. , PRICE OF urn Eli. CD tl" . To the Nlercitante. To th e el' . rst ..... Seecui Third ......... ........ ". 86 Fourth Filth ............ ..... 7 0 Sixth .... •••.••••• ........... . CI.ON 51 ELL MARKETS- June 5 Pet • 1 . S. 0 q d. A. .1 s. C L .i, V, 1 , iew Butte; ilitrnea' l3 0 i 3 6 BaColli` c.....,.....,41 Rt , .iidereu Lard 0 b•.: ~ rleads ......,,... « ....4' ' - I Pe: 6e 1 ,. 0$ . 1 elotir, Second ..... — C 1 k tom, i :iai........, .- ~,. --,, 0, i . * liouseliold —1 ., 34 0 1.-- Foulida..... , ii 0 1 ; Per Barrel. — 1 0 - 0 ll '.. a l: 1 1 27 , ...... . 7: ". .. :. - • ... •+ 1 ? : fig KILKENNY z..A hhf.tb.'4.P Wlieat s per barrel)2B. Od.to 353.0 d. Eiref •ier 5t....... I ) )1 1 tiur`ey 12 0 15 0 141..t. - t1 ........... 0 i 5 f vats .... ..... . ...... l4 0 15 I - Pork .....,.....«- n 6 10 . Flour (per bag) 2 , : 0 :Al 0 ~, ev , .... ...... . A 0 01: lititter(pet ewt.) 90 0 10i. 0 t•res.r. S mter .• Y. 6 ' a w Bacon Pigs SS (1 42 6 'gait 011.1.• .......... ',,. 9 . Coals 1 0 1 2 Fotatoesiper at./ . 3appsevd.... V.: 0 Bere go A FATAL PUGILISTIC CONTEST a I b lic..l KILLED.—Onn Monday last a fight, caused by r e i t iween,d quarrel, took place i n th e v i c i nit y o f Gloucester, 0 og r e o, men of local celebrity, named William, alias 1.. isel_ k sll Brown, and Philip Inkin. O ne h a d heard the otl kits Inkin was " abetter man " th an B rown , w heretipon I g htEk longed. Westgate-bridge was fixed upon for th e et ito owing to the inte r f erence o f t h e po li ce t h e y adjourn l if burst-green, w h ere , a f ter l i g h t i ng 75 rounds, P r ..„1 3 j i krj d ; lpfr sensible, and w as remove d to t h e Infirmary,vn e ' s "gi e s a few hours. F rom t h e f acts e li cite d b e fore Th cb- utt tl ,- , , Esq., Coroner, it appeared that at the fifteenth led pon e em an interfered, but the combatants were r es ° o o o ll on. Agai n , a t th e forty-fifth round, the same P °ll thei 1 :110 ( companied by another, entered the ring, and with k s is 0 11 threatened t o b re a the first man's arm who s truc o s t blow, when Mr. Chesterton, a gentleman, rode 14, o r them t o stan d b ac k or h e wou l d report t h em —that the Unity roundi, and wanted to see the end, wherenc,or".oe 'icemen fell Lack. The sec on d s an d bottle-hold ers - diet role leave ; but Air. Chesterton rode round, f o rmed t: 1 O h n e 0 ,0 000 and again b roug ht th e men to t h e scra t c h. A botly, A fifth r,und Brown fell, and the app e arance of st r lita i arni,le pro o f s o f th e d ea dl y con fli ct . Th e Poli ce : - sbe,,l't extenuation of their conduct, th a t th e temper „",, rot alt' prevented them f rom ac ti ng Th e J ur y returneu; c iel, r e , " Alanslaughter" against Philip Inkin, the yrLd.red 6 00 Chesterton, and other aide rs a n d a b e ttors, an o r een d oe cord of censure to he made against the poilee', sod df twenty- , even ye;:rs of a_e, and h a s l e ft a wj" °- to te' chi]dien. Int,in, from injuries, is in a is unmarried, aid about twenty-one.— Wilts Stau dar a a jed 21 hi° d an gerous Thu demand fcr vouchers for the al , n u- fic nian ball has been so great that the ladies patoP ee psm determined to issue a f'w more at the double 1 11 , I .; l elfbio 2/. 2s. Several fancy dress quadrilles are a!reatiyifed. all the members a the Royal - farni4 have been if' v a ' t t - 4 0 0 ° "), ball has al.v safely add the preccdi GOLD carefulty finished Second-hand Gold Watches, an? accordance with th e l atest taste, w i t h Gold each, &c., are off ere d f or se l ect i on, price E i ght G u ineas s oda At T. CIA SAVORY'S, h ill Watchmaker, Gold and S.lilver,mith, 47, Cl i o. dr ltie" doors from Graceeher c h- s t r eet), f, 00- A.printed warranty will b e give n , with axed erj rd' the Watches will always receive any attention reqo,,e, Second-hand Watches pu rc h as ed in WW l ' JO r far o , s SPOONS, FORKS, &c., superior t o Sii :,:k mt is , I ojtAlf rahility, equal in appeara nce . T a bl e Sp o ons t b .r c a nwiii Dessert, lOs. ; Tea Spoons, s s . per dozen; Ta ble t i i ,,, 8 inches high, 7s. p e r pair; the particula r ffi ,- on i t V these articles are made is so like silver, that it « • from it by the stamp; every article made in sn tured in this material by f „,,j-sts_,lllr RIPPON and BURTON, W e ll s - stree t, Olv" OOP - Who, to prevent imposition, confine the sale of it • 1 Catalogues of priees grata- RTHS. On the 6th inst., the lady ` of George Rawbon e ' ft o. A 000 1. King's-road, Chelsea, of a son , w h o sur vived be char les On the 6th inst., at Clif ton , th e lady = Ci e of a Hare, Esq., of a son. Or . On the 6th lust., M r s. Ch r i s t op her Rob jels° o' 7 Trinity-lane, of a daughter. i eere ' . • old. On the 7th inst., at Yo r k-pl ace , Portal- ' gel • i • of It. Hebeler, Esq., ofa son. On the 7th inst., a t N e l son -t errace , Stoke Die Stewart Ringer, of twin sons. gald ISIARRIMIL The let lai 6tC On the 3d inst., at Stoke Gayland, Dorse t, of O h . IP liet, Esq , second son of J. L. Moilliet, Est e e of. t " Hall, Stafford, to Louisa W o l cot t, secon d &Lig t. A - r a i d H. F. Yeatman, LL. 8., o f S toc k H ous e, Elc ) . 11- 1. 0 7' I ntle" 0 ( J On the sth inst., a t St. P ancras Church, treett,, cf Liverpool, to Maria, Fisher, of Cameen-9obefi - vs town, youngest dau g ht er o f t h e l ate William F . Somerset House, and Muswell-hill, HorriseY• faseit,rind' On the sth inst., at th e B r i t i s h Embassy', Gras a de Villamil, daughter of . o li f . ll , lonsivtir 51artIn de .rejl Charles W ' ihiam a,f9,--14.e'Gte.rlii:niii:strjots44115'sioefeiv On the 7th inst., at St. Pane; of Alagthlen Came, Oxford, to Elizal,eth, e.'"`„ TO - Edward Levier', Esq., of Upp-r Woburn-PI" square. On n n the th e sth4th i i n n s s t t. : G th e e or ß g e e 7 R . W. g I il t °I Mount. . street, Berkel, aged 26. sen e 0 On the sth nut , Henryli'y Samuel, the infant be !selll,i.secil•loenndlne':(-310fr. c;iceptli'll H. Hitchins, Madras . Army. he i ' l l€ 6 On the 6th i ns t., at Beddington,, of which rs w ie , Rector 59 years, the Rev. John B ro mfield Fer re ag ea 8.300 On th(.. tith inst , at Bridgewater, Mr. BovieP,:, thit d On the 7th ins;.,:at Dulwich-common , Eln'''' so ter of John Smith, Esq., aged 17. rt abe.'"* lt On the 4th inst., at 131akenev, Norfolk, . 02 o f the lat e W B rick, F ,. 80 0 cimg a London: Printed and Published by MV 2 . w•-:. No. 11% Strand, at The Sete Office, N°' JO , 10" the euuntf of Alidiltsex.4llundliY, June Nays been the glandest of the sea'ont . p 1 . that the o ne this year will not be in fer'o ing ones. t o e ----........ ~,Ilen• 0 ! ;.,,, W ,, A ,, TC II E , S.— A y ariety _ofrnes:Tofialejoill V 1 to k poi of 7.1 Wit1: 11 -2 rj;