The Sun. — London, England, 1816-06-11 00:00:00

proper time .for 2floptlng some meatnre, 'with a v* ! t•-•.. 01.elassing cousolitisting the Statutes, .critihl not be until such an examination had been BATtIUUST said, witil reapeet to ale A mend. that it could. ont he agreed to, .s it would be At leiv4t jircessilry for the House, during tlte c'olit Session, to take some measure, after what bail been done by the other House, and the cons . municatioo rereiN:•ed from it. Mr. Aar aettotants said, that the more the sub iect was diseitssed, the greater appeared the oh. jet lions to the proposed measure. He hoped that the Hon. Gentleman' (Mr. B.inkes) would take the sense of ihe House on his Amendment, as Ihtle 4% as no particular evil complained of. and whatever deficiuney existed, as to the arrangement of the Statutes, might be Supplied in the ordinary way. Mr. BlionGram begged leave to observe, that a work wa s now far advanced, under the manage mew of that eminctit and accomplothett Lawyer, llr..Bearr', of Manchester, which' Would embrace the object cif the measure now proposrd to the noose. was now nearly completed, and in three molubs'; certainly before Michaelmas 'Fenn; It would he finished. Mr. RATH u HST wild, that the work of Mr. Evans omitted many important heads in theStatuti Book —for instance, the whole class of Stattites.re lating to the revenue and military subjects were omitted. - Besides, Mr. Evans's work. WKS rattier in fact a Treatise of the Statute Law, being com posed Of copious poles, and having the Statutes HS a text. What teas required was a complete and perfect Abridgment of the Statute Law. pIiNSuNBY said, lie did not know .what it was that the other House would have them Be wished some Hon. Gentleman would inform the House what was meant ; because, for the "louse to concur in a proposition which they did riot understand, would not be a very creditable proceeding. Prom all that he bath heard, it did - not ,appLar to him that any one Member under stood it. Mr. W. DuNzms Said; that the object whiCh it was desired to obtain was brie of great importance. 11 would be a great benefit to Scotland, if all the Statutes relating /1i that country were Classed tin. der one head. Nit'. iliiitNEß said, it was it very nice question of construction as to 'whether many Statutes ex tended to ; and therefore oit,,sbt to be reserced for the decision of the Judges, as to the part lectllr cases in 'which the question arose. l'he House .then divided on Mr. Batta,is's Alltendineut. Nbef ' • , ho • Niejority,, —34 „Ori our re •admission - to the G.die t ry,' we:found debate- Ctintihning on- the origival -motion. • BAtrites wished: to know what nieueureir wes . iovntied to adopt 'Mr. BaTituttsr said, that its to any individintl saying what would. lie the opinion of the : ember Ire q .,4 as tilOie arrattgented to Oe adopted, itivais;- oiirot the Ovation until there was a eoniamica- Cali:with the Lords in more explicit terms. • .p r "lint Nta said that be alorrehernied what .his HO. Frieda wisliett to - know w h as this, Wheter iw t'as inieutied . .to act on - the Resolution imme- diately. Mr.: l'Onsonnv.-4t Was most uccecsary that the Jrnaie should be made to ooderstatul what they were . doing.. For his own part, lie dui oot think that ;be Stature Law required any alteration, anti o4.tbat ground lie objected to cite Resolution. — wh et , t h e fli g ht 1-1 0 houraide Gentleman (Mr. liorhar4t). One of his Majesty's Ministers, brought imolai! this subject, it was Very tile st i oald expert him to be able to explain .wbat. was intended to be dune, and bow nincluthe expence was likely:to be.. lint this inlortnation the !light Honourable Gentleman cotild not give, end indeed he seethed to know just as little on the Stihjeel as every one cite. The Resolution was then agreed to, Including the Statutes id betitiAiiii and it e1411(1, and a Mess Sage ordered to be sent to the Lords, to acquaint their Lordships therewith, anti request a e011ie• r eu se 011 the subject. EATS' WITH ALGIEM. Nit. Blunt; rt am seeing the Noble Lord; Sotere.. tor'yra , State for Foreign Affairs, in his place, wished twask h u n whether it was true that' Lord Eginitnth had mule's Treat y• with Algiers, touch jog the ransoming Of Sardinian and Neapolitan sob:wets, taken prisoners by that State 1 I,ord CASTIAUEAGLI replied, that an arrange. 114 tit 1110,Celqiiitly been Matte with the .1)”t of Met's, but int to any regular Treaty, he (Ind not know that any such had been made, nor was there. any stipulation kbr the payment of ransom by threat fir stain. ' Mr. BuouonAst.—lf we had not engaged to pay the'rausom ourselves, be wished to know, whether we had not stipulated to do so on behalf of our Allies, to whom the 'treaty referred I Lord. Ph%TLitakAGA.I.-Wilatever stipulations bait been made MI behalf of oar Allies, were en.; tiiehy with :their concurrence. BROUGHAM.—IIas the Noble Lord any ojvcrion to lay a Copy of the Treaty before the lionse:? - Lorti CASTLEnzmut.—There is not yet any Copy of it in my possession. I.l;tre th'e conversation dropped. IRISC3 GRAND JURY DILL. Mr. Hottmea having moved the second reading of the Irish Grand Judy Indictment Bill, Colonel BARRY thought no sufficienkreason bad been assigned for the change which this Bill would produce in the a(lininistration of the Law its-Ire land. The provisions of the Bill went to exclude • ell evidence that was not given viva voce, and al though there were words in the Bill which allowed tie adduction of omit other evidence as the case %,ontd admit of, yet Wit- would be attended with great inconvenience. For inetartee, if this Bill ‘s s passed,, be did not see how a man wire had confessed a crime before a Magistrate, could be donv i c (cd on , his confession in writing, if he chose to plead " not guilty." He therefOre moved as f n endolent, that the Bill nhoiild be read a se , , :nd tim e this day three mounts. z-)ir F. FLOOO said; , t that whoever read the rile aud preamble of his BM must hitnself ~.tnund tq vote agaiust it. The Gritnd Juries in Ireland had acted for the last Century on the prin. Cli"C it was the object of this Bill to over. torn. The practice or (-grad Juries Was always to eall - for vloa iore evidence vhere it was neees sury, from rniv doubts of the veracity ot a witness. He defied anv one to quote Lord Coke,; Lord Hale. Jodge Poster, or Judge Roller, in support of the principle 'of this Bill. • h contained an im putation against all the Grand Juries of Itektid ; therefore he would, vote for the Amendment. - Mr. PM. was Winced to d ive his vote for this Bill, "because he thought it highly expedient to assimitate the laws of - lingland anti Ireland. lie did not think that his Hon. Priend who spoke last, or his Right Ron. Friend who Moved the Amendment, bad . atldneed Roy argument against [ the Bill, as far as its principle went. Their only Abjection was to the title of the Bill. 'When it was stated that the practice of Orand Jnriet had been to: call for via voce evidence in certai n . cases, this was clearly art argument in favour of the Bill In short, there were only object ions•of. _detail, which timid he easily obviated, and-there was none to the principle. There was nothing to throw the least imputation against Grand ;furies. For these reasons he should•suppott the Bill. • Lord CAST RR A Gil said, lie should also support the Bill. He felt that there was nothing in the least degree ro Ireland, in ing to as,imilate the administration of the law there to ‘‘ hat it was in England.• lie thought it desirable that written information shouiC go be fore the Grand Jury t as it would enable them to examine witnesses much more at:dually, by making them accput;ntedwith the stature of the case. He wive(' to be informed whether a per son giving false evidenee betote a Grand Jury could be convicted tir perjury, as it seem e d to him of great importance that perjury in such cases should be most heavily punished. Mr. HORNED expressed great satisfaction the liberal and enlightened v law which the Noble • Lord tank of the Bill. He 'did certainly- apple bend that false testimony given hviore the Grand Jury would be perjury. Mr..Justiee Buller. had decided that the oath of secrecy of Gram, Jury.; min'heing taken for the purpose -of turthering• instice, could not prevent , Hitt trout giving evi dence for the purpOse of convicting a .witne,s of 110.aegravated an offence as perjury. - After a few exiilisuatory observations from Lord Caitlerritelt; Mr. Peel, and Mt - . Horner, • Mr; Yea tte It opposed t and . adduced ths Niinions of several Judges :against it. • • Sir J. S . Vos tit Was understood -to support the. . . • r. A ut;tt - Citot4 sfit'llefentled it, arid quoted the opinion of Baron:George, one at 'l6e Irish Judges, and' st vet.4l Other high authoritie4, in its.fa% our. Ile hailed the titcasure sti one of the most impor,- taut slepsjo restore trabquinity - Mr" W. POL 2 approved of • the principle of the .but wished . tome hltere i tionit to be while; which could be'elfected iu its ptogress through the [louse.' Sir 3. Nr.WPORT supported the Bill,. beenuce be apt the law now stood, the party ac rut, Cl in Ireland frith not the Statue protection ex• tentieil biro : oil' in this cosititry: Mr. Ponsiitikty alarr xnpporteri the Bill ; Sir 'G. Hill WAS tinder'stobtl to 4itliert to the 41i-11'; Mr. 'Curwen supported it.—The House divided.. For the original 'motion 6O. . Fo r thlditrUtlltitilialt. • ' • najority in favour of tilt original mot i4o--40, • T;112 t3ill wits then veld itsecoucl BLGIN MARBLES. The Report of the Committee of Supply was brought up. On the Resolution for wanting MAW. for the ILlgin Mathles, Mr..evewria again protested against the grant. Sir Rint.itY defended it, ai it wits intended to proehre uit invalitabte collection, which %%mild contribute to the teal riches of thecotsittry. Mr. DAvuts Gioo'r defended the grant ; melotained, that akin the-ease of the, Etruscan Vases, purchnsed from Sir William Holllton, the country would derive greater advantage from the sale of the models taken front them- chefs - - diceavre, than she lout expended to procure them. The Resolution was put and agree to without a _ . The other Ite3olotions were Olen agreed to, CONsOLIDATION OF Tin• F.NGI I ISH, AND . IRISH EXCkIEQUIZAIS. • The House having gone into a Committee on the Exchequers' Consolidation 13111, Sir H. Nam+ rose to , state some objections. which struck him in looking over the Bill. The first thing which he pointed out as objectionable was the appointment of two new L or d s o f t h e Treasury in England, for no reason that he could • perceitite. He would admit-the increase of public duty on the Chancellor of the Exchequer. , and would recommend for his relief an additional Secretary to the Treasury. He observed that a new officer was to be created by this Bill, whose duty necessarily implied his personal at tentlauce its Ireland, to direct the issue of public money t yet, strangely enough, this °dicer was allowed to hold a seat in Parliament---a situation incompatible with his ditties in Ireland, which wire strictly local. , His next objection was to the Lord Lieutenant's controul over the' issue of money, which he %vault propose to vest in the Board of Treasury in England and he strongly disapproved the authority left to the Lord Lieu tenant over the whole" of the revenue. Ile tvioh ed to know whether the appointment of Officers was-still to remain with the. Lord Lieutenant as before, or whether it was to be transferred to the . Treasury Board bete) The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he had not yet gone into the Bill at large, because he found the principle and outline agreed _to, and therefore thought it better 'to confine himself so lely to `answering such objections as were - sr eitieally Aimed, He should, iu pnrsuanci of t course ) answer the objections of the Honour able Baronet. The reason why two Lords of the Treasury were added was this : The Treasury Board in England had of, late a great increase of oiidat business, both in manual and intellectual . labour in the Treastny business, as well hi in communicating with the Revenue and Admiralty Boards. 'Phis Board therefore would have been w h o ll y i nu a cquo te to the accession of dirty from the COIISOlidg!OLI of the *To lreasurers, and the' best mob of providing for the exigency was. add - log two Members, selected from the Irith Board, for the advantage of local and personal knowledge Of the new business imirosed by the Bill before the Committee. The two Boards were thus in some ()egret. , amalgamated, byjoining two Menabers , of the Irish to the English Board. He was not !hen prepared to say whethei - it would be expedient to creete another Secretary • for the relief of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Bei in conse quence. of the increased duties of that office, the Bill proposed an increase of 10001. a year to the, salary.' lint there was a reduetioreof five Lords of the 'Preastiry, and of the . .salary.of the Irish Chantellor of the Exchequer, as such, and as a Lord of the Treaanry ; so that a considerable public saving would accrue froin this Bill, With regard to the controul of the Lord LientenAnt over the 'wen of the Treasury it was purely ministerial, not discretionary, ncting Only up on- grants by P.irliaineot or .King's letter. TheVice-Treasurer, annfficer which he reviewed under the old'native, in order to keep as close as possible to ancient usage, would he responsible to, the English Board for the issues of the Irish Tree .sury, and, es that was an office of- great import ance,- and should consequently befitted by a pee- son of eminent talents, capable of adorning that or the other House, be thought it most proper that a seat in Parliament 'should be compatible with it. He proposed that the' Vice-Peaserer should be allowed a salary of three thousand five lwoire.(l pound's a year, - and a Deputy to act for hint in ease of belispoeition. The only remaining objection ofthe lion. flu rt. was, leavine the pat rim age. of the Tieasury to the saute. exteneas before, in the hands of the Lord Lieutenant, who from local knowledge was, much more competent to exercise it. beneficially` than tor frensery Board land, to whieh the Hoe. Baronet would transfer fie tuns aware- teat :Ally difficulties would eriee io the progress of this ine:tsine, Midi PS the (Wheel • y of c o mmenicie toe at the cud- of .each Teo ier, cvltttu the .whole revenue of both cowl rie• 'beceme our teed. Bet arrange meets would he ne - ele to ',Linde these difficulties as far ae it was .possible. Sir 'NewpouT . sav no' reason why the Vice- Tteasurer might not be responsible - tot TEcie , 4 l tY. isse es .by Parliament ary -grant 7ter King's letter, with . iiitt the order of- the Lord ,Lientenant. tic j Aisaporoved ellowine'liim ter act by deputy or tit itt Perliament„ as his duty -was strictly lova!, end would be interfered in b . y any_ thing that re-., -quired his eib , enee. There vats no analogy .bee teteen him a n ti' a Chanceller of the 'Excheqeer,,, who 'was officially ebliged.to explain his conduct to Parlia'rnent, ahil direct the progress et a-great TAtiet yor Bills. He must MO 'object to de- lay priiposed, which'` he considered touch too . large for a sehordinate officer, us this Vice-Treae sorer ifas t,, Ohicctioio, however, were only to the detail; and lie Was not ived , iel.to opittiOn that he had expressed. -, • Mr. Pete eitinplimented - elie:Right Honourable Gentleman on' his , rainloui; but did not agree with hinile Ids objeetions to' the .Bill. He thought the - Lord' Lieutenant alone competent to direct issues ler ttuval, military, and civil payments, for services . ordered by -him, and tinder such a con- • trout by the functions of the Vice-'l' reaserer, that be could not possibly abuse his netemity. • He contended that it was as proper to allow a semen) Parliament to.the Vice-7rensurer, as to the rrea surd' of the Navy or 'Paymaster-General, and _as to. his a/t bydepittylluring occasional absence, it was as.conteratible with the due discharge of bis duties iu his (Mr. P.'s) Situation of. Chief Se- Cretary. . Mr. PotetoNeV condemned - the:salary of 3,5001. a year to life Vice-Treashrer, and wished to trans ter the ordinary payments oot of the Treesury trinn the. Lord -Lieutenant to the Treasury Board in England.- Mr. FITZGRRALD acid, that was a runty not performed-by the Treasury even England, but committed to flee Treasurer of the Navy and Pay master* General. He thought it strange. that the Right Hon. Gentleman should transfer the.diaty . front the Lord Lieutenant, who had so many ad 'vantages of a local nature, to ,the EnglisleTrea 'stay Board, which was remote, end destitute of :persritual or local knowledge. . • Sir H. PARNELL: contended t. that rto sufficient reason was giveofor.ellowingo seat in Parliameet to an officer whose ditties were not particularly the subject of Pariiameptioy„controhl ; and ftc still insisted that a he appointment of officers would he more , beeetieially placed in the Treasury in England, that: in the Lord ieutepeet, Stlrroonded as he. was :by itifiuenee.aind application in Ireland,. -• Mr. WY NNE: was of opinion that the Vice- rrea sure of the Exchequer should not seat-in Parliament.. , . ... • 'Mr. BANKEs ✓thought the main point, was, that the Officer : should execute the duty in person, and that it shßtild not be made a sinecure by being overpaid. The Officer should reside in the coun try, and should not be competent to sit in Par fiaineut: r Sir M. letnetty• inquired if an compensation Avas intended to be"tootle to ate Officers. that %timid be reduced, - The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, than it- had been in contemplation to allow some compensation to the Clerks who might be dismis sed, but the number had not yet been determined, After some' oleservations on. the part of Mr. Bankes, Mr. V. Fitzgerald, and Sir J. Newport, the Bill went through: the ColOHlittee, t h e report was received,' and ordered . to be taken into fur ther consideration on Thursday. HAVE SEL'D. The House, on toe motion of Mr. BRAND, went into a Committee, on the Acts relative to rape seed. After some prefatory remarks, the Ikon. Ucktleman.proceeded to move two Resolu tions, the first having for its object to repeal the present duties on rape seed, and the second to impose, a ditty of ten pounds per last upon ell• rape seed imported into the United !kingdom. The first. Itiso)ntioo seas' nit and carried. Upon 'the second being put by the Chairman, - • Lord IV/tt.ToN opposid the Resolution upon the ground that the relief was hilly - prospective, and would be 1110intately injurious. Sir J. NEWPOR'T was in favour of the Reich). Lion. .149 rd gRA saw; 11 , '.45t thought it important fa,. .I Inc It .'...51 0), 111 u~ . the agriculture or the :cchintry that t tions shcnild.be adopted. Mr. CURWEN said that- ho one class of mea should be relieved at the expense of another,which. would Ice the effect orthe Resolution in question, and by which a heavy tax would also be laid upon. the Woollen Manufacturers. MrAittivou,sx-was in favour of the Resolution. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER Mid, the . question bad been so fully discussed, that he shoidd not detain the House by going into detail. He supported the Resolutions - . • After some further 'conversation between mt . ; Comet), Lord Milton,,and Mr. Brand, the House divided — For the Motion 42 Against Majority ill faiour of the Resolution —37 In a Coniniittee of Ways and Means it w ore. , solved, that the Unclaimed Di eidends in the hand] of the Bank 'exceeding 700,0001: should time to time: applied to the service of the public. The Report of the CC/1111114M was ordered to be received this day. The Report of the Husbandry Horses' Bill was brought up. Several new clauses were agreed to, and the Bill was ordered to be read a thirl time on Thursday. The Minor Offenders' Bill was read a third time, and passed. The Report of the Bank Capital Bill was re. eeived, and agreed to, and the Bill ordered to be read a third time on Friday next. 1 , ktil other th Orders of the Day were then disl'9"-4- eel o f, Adjourned at Ora 1 •° - this morning. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE 19. Lord ELLs M.) novo H Sit 4' tinge to-day, taut 110(bitig i t:C l it l a l d t lolet ?I:::;ll:lltnerebta'' OLD BAILEY. Yesterday 37 priioners were tried, of "' h ° m were convicted of felony. Same day tile 1 1 " coaDett passed sentence of death on thefollt , w 4 ; prkoners, viz. : • • . John Dunnage and William Fellows; for highway rubbe r ) ' Isaac Jonas, Simon Soloruous, Hymn Phillips, 'rhos, Bre", (;,•orge Naolservilla, William linker, William Colville, %V.!'" Liam thrion.in, Fiatieis Fox, ltobert JohnsOn; and job* Davis, for like offeiwes; Wm. Gregory, fur forging a trias 4 ftr of 151.; Joseph Boyce, for forging a deed ; and Corgi I%layeork, for uttering: and patting away a forged 21. Wk . ' note; Thonass Willionss, alias George 'Atkins, far house breaking; Esther Sampson ' for stealing goods in a dweliiiir house; John PriMrOse and William Gow, for hiirglary ; J"h rl Harvey and Peter Herbert, for a like offence ; Sarah Gilbert , ' r Charles Butler, William Smith, Charles Rogers, Win. Reath • Aston Macdonald, James .Carey, dames Hall, and Joh., star man, for stealiug iu dwalling-bouies ; and Jatues . Wiliterit' l sheep stealing. EXTENSIVE FORGERIES. M sw-Houst..-Ireisterby a respect:oG looking man, Who stated h name to be Samuel was brought before the Loan MATa g ! anti underwrnt an examination, charged ork ens Iticiitti of being concerned in numerous forgerie. s ' recently been discovered and cirri!' 14 , VdritAS parts of the kingd'ons, sutler had already underwent a private exinnion tion, but neither this nor the investigation fir yesterday have serVed to throw a suffi c i e nt lig u upon 'his extraordinary case. me i? i h l e an ie k v!t il ien e c r e: f. of ni N s t ni r. re l:d i ‘ t va a r p d p P ea ri r t e c d ha t r b d a , t a o f t. R . g : s; of May ;a.t three were brought to their bold* DY '' e o t son who represented himself as belonging to the boetto Durrnester and - Co. London, and stating that heva°l44l .- + . . castt for the purpose of buyi - ng wool. r ies. These were discounted, but soon discovered to'be forg e 3u t A North hill was also discounted for the same verso), 401. thi%-proved to be genuine: The former amounted t" aud.the individual received their own notes princiPa!'i pitysm•nt to of Mr. Pritchard was not enabled' to speak to the Tiers ilea the , -,au'who pit the bills discounted, but the prisohe r V ote s taken-into custody, was in possession of five of the wa s that hati-been.paid in the discount. A bill also for 1 3111 . found upon him, and 130 v/. in notes .of varitm* sums 11" different banks. ' er- Mr. Pry, the hanker, stated, that some titue since tw? P 1 ,,,, sons # all visited Swansea, where they dttempted to obwiti till, discount of, or atherwise circulated forged' !Notts; 19 f they ....d not ,acteed ; but were , uteesstul in the a IPint Weli tor 161 1 . 9.5. Gd. for which they paid in lieu forr, Notes. These persoi:s Were afterwai cis. traced to Esett?t, where` hey nesrocial ed else Bill. Sonic of the Note:: giyei it!: exchange for this were also found in possession of the yr) ,ol , e The Dills preeetYled by the two persons alluded to Ther a .`'" durseti,"Jutin Eiltg." • - • i il Since the apprehension of .the' prisoner , 1 . o.' apartinenq were searched, and here, hesides co • • • • the stilt:rattle pruperty, Baas found a check oo •► ho house of Presdott end Co. which proved to - purchate ~.)1 torged. . ,_ . '• Th F re ‘vas an immense quantity, of Bills (for.: Reties) exhibited by different houses, amoulitio6 to several thousands of pounds, and the Office al‘'. crowded to excess by bankers, merchants. tratlev, men, 10. 4-• At the close of the examination, Mr. /07., DREWS pressed the discharge Of the prisoner, .1104'1' the ground that nothing had been proved agsl o .'r kiln to warrant his detention . . The Loan MAYoa expressed his convictitin the necessity, us well as justice, of the invest l o ls ' ruin, anti could by HO means listen to the appli",:-' tine in tk case of such magnitude and interestrivr: the public. His Lordship, therefOre, advi se d,,—' zealons effort to be made by all - parties in prob ll i I; the case to the uttermost, acid ordered tlieT:t„ ‘ saner. to lie remanded for another examitit__ On the oth:inst. at Banst ß ea ß d, TH Su S rrer, the Lady 0r - 4 rdi Allfiey, Esq. of a son, who survived but a fizw Lours. , 4', 0, Oa the thh in , t. at Kensiugtau , the Lady oi (;Car y thnny Sawyer, Esq. of a son. p 0 Yetterday, hi 1 impoheltreet, the Lady _of Jmne l Esq. of a daughter. ___.-------''' MARRIE pr On the Z 3 inst. at Kelvin Grove get - Aland, Archi ba thanan, Esq. of Auchintorlie. to Miss Dennistoun „ L ot On Friday, at St. Andrew's Chinch, Plymouth, Liem".i o. 4, O'Connell, of the dzsd ittegillient, to 14Liss.Fraoccs 1,1 daughter of Mr. Lying, East-street. `Last week. at Supley Church, near Winchester, s'" eri Lod Wilder, F.sq. third sn* of the late Dr, Wil ,laa,b,. Purley-Halt, Berk*, to Augusta leers Mary, youngest ter of Helmond Walcott, ENcl of st=inky tly On the 4th inst. at his h o use nu Altiertuanbuty, , n": year of his age, Mr. Choistopher Kempster Betchey. 6its, General Thornas Murray, on the 84th of April, at where he hisd gun. , fr the reaorpty of his health. At Carnwath Mans o e, Scotland, on the 9.eth ult. the t i i is George Mark, Minister of the parish of Carnsvatlif 1 ° 87th t 4 his so, mai bath of leis ministry. . 7,tac" On the :.sth nit. at Callender, in Perthshire, : V r.ine'.! nab, L-q. of Maenah, at the age of t..., LONDON: Printed by .1. R. CAILSTAIRS, No. 7, - de or buildinct I am! IV. A,.SCILIPPS. of l ''''" t ia• at the >u::-OFFiCE. So. Ile, Strand ; where 160 wt-nts,,OrJori, Imetttri (ptit-gttitrj,Sic._o4l4l 110 311441'"