The Sun. — London, England, 1819-04-30 00:00:00

Irnd the clauses and amendmentt read a second 'time. PENRYN ELECTION. Sir C. BURR;iI observed, _that as be had fre iuently allowed his motion regarding the Bo rough of Penryn to stand over for the,accomtno -dation of public business, be hoped that the House would come to a clear Understanding, that it was to be brolght on the very first thing on the 12th of May next, which, hem) the order b ok, he found Co be an open day. The oroer for taking this Subject into con - side , ration or. Monday, the 34 of May, was'then :charged, and another made in compliance with ,the wish expressed by thr Hon. Baronet. LICENSED vicru.ALLERg Mr. lies:l4gr said, that he shouhl bring on his mot ion for an-alteration . in .016 present Billre gardini.; Licensed Victuallers on the same day. CATI-10LIe CLAIMS. The SPEAKER called the attention of the House to the intettess.of the hour, mid snggested the pro priety of proceeding to the. bitsiness of the day, ohser%ing that if any Gentleman had peti tions to p eseut in I.trour-ot,—pragahtst the Ca• ;hen was the proper time. . . . Sir F. flu RDETT ptiesented •a petition sig!ipr! 13.000 perSbus, hibahitants of London and Vcs' • minster, in favour of Catholic Emancipation. T! , e 'Claims uf,the ,Catholics, he observed, to o ke placed On an entire v(putlity W 1 ,1) their Protestant co.ni ttymeo, coidil not much iouger he denied and in was bin t.dr oar thos e ktho trod ' Their shri , e in all the thfEenl , i , s and d;Stre7ses of the c o untry, should aka stance io the lienefiis of the Crust rite. !too. Tue . Hon. Baruoet theu p s ieseuted it sdni-• . liar petit to, from ; Liverpool. 11 1 : NN t ., rreit • n t e d p e ti'tions from firming - bath, Woleeil,antpton, Flarwiol,• and from the Catholics of fungay; prayiiig for the removal of the exioingdisabilities against the Catholics. ' Mr. METHVEN presented a petition, with which he himsdf agreed, front the 'Archdeacon and Clergy of IViltshite, playing that no further con• cessions niight be made to the Roman Catholics. It was much to he regt eyed that Ministers, in. order to keep their places, ,should have waived the question. and not have taken a decided part. Mr. C. HurctuNsori must protrst against., the doctrine, as unconstitutional and unparliamentary, that ;Mimi-tern should he supposed to have the .power of stifling, or of carrying any question through that House. • Mr. L. AVELLESLRY presented a similar petition from the Al'ehdeactin and Clergy of .the Diocese of . Salishitry, agoinst anY further 'concessions ,to the Roman Catholics ; in tie sentiments of which Ile himself concurred. Ile hoped that the 110, nourable and Venerable Advocate of the Catholics xymild propose such' securities to the Home, on the suliect of the Protestant Ascendancy, as woall remove the fears that had been eintertairn on that subject. Should these securities appear to hint to ire sAtisfactury, that circurn , tani'e mi4ht, perhaps, induce him to alter his opinion, Tie first nit rite petition was that of ,Archtleacon Coxe, ‘v!to by his historical r•. searches, .arid part ictilark his'llistury of the Houle of Anistria, was so well qualili d io'appreciate•thesub;ect correctly. Coltotel ,O'Nat it. presented a • petition front Antrim), signed by 19,000 persons, 4000 of whom belonged to the Town. of Belfast, against Catholic Eiwitici l rdtion. • . Mr. W PAR ELL presented a petition from Ark mow, in the County of ,Wicklow, in tav4 - )nr of Catholic Emancipation.—Oidered to be laid on the table: Mr. littowtl presented a petition from the Comity 01 - M4yo, .to. the saine effect.—Laid on the table. General ARCHDALE. said, he had a petition from the County of Fermanagh to present ; and added, that if farther concessions were grairted to the Catholics, the honest Proteitauts of the,North of Ireland would emigrate to America ; for they would never live to be trampled upon by . Popery. The petition Was against any 'concession to the Catho lics of Ireland. Sir J. NEWPORT said. that the Protestants of Waterford, who had petitioned for farther con cessions to tlitt Catholie, were not biassed . tear or any other motive ; and that they were as respectable as the Protestants of Fermanagh . could be. General AitCHDALL said, that in the North of Irelaa. Protestant bankers had been thrcalened With runs on their houses, and laivyers to be de prived of their briefs. • • ••• _ Mr.GßATTkNAlefended the Protestants of Dub lin who had peeitioned in favour of the Catholics, It was numerously attended, ant! the. Assembly was as incapable of being acted upon, by tear as the Protestants of England. Ills Opinion. on the whole, Was, that the charge made by the Hon Gentleman was totally unfounded. Gen. ARcEIDALI dig! not Mean to say, that the threats' held nut against the Protestants of the Nor t exfanded to'other parts of Ireland. Mr; C. Iltrrott tNsoN said he was sure the galhint General (Archdrill), after having himself led on Catholic heroes to victory in defence of the Em pire, would never raise his voice io the !louse to make slaves of his Catholic fellow-citizens.— There hatrbeen in the poblic prints an Order from a Commander in Ireland, warning the soldiers not to join in Catholic petitions. It was his opi nion that they would odd to the stability of the Empire by placing their Catholic fellow-subjects on a footing with themselves. Mr. Pm. did not wish to enter into a prema ture disciission tbe Catholic Question, and-la mented the fet liti of irritation which already seemed to have di,playeil . The lion. Gen tleman who had just sat down, had stated certain things with respect to a petition which had been placed in his (Mr. P.'s) hand to present to the "l o use . , which' compelled hint to co r e r into some explanations. lie had. said, that extraordioai y efforts bad been made to procure signatures to the 1 1 ,• o rest a ot l'eti ion against the Catholic Claims. Ile bad es : en stated, that the bine coat boys and non commissioned ofticeis and.soldiers had been press• ed into the' service. ThC fe assertions haci ready speared in the 1)0)1'1c prints, and the Go vernors of the Blite ! Coat.SchOols had been assem- bled, under the Pres•dency of:the - Lord Mayor, in order to ascertain tice Fier, as far as the boys. were' concerned; ,o tire leStilt hafl been a cfc 7 claradon .that the assertion was false and scaud4- )0113. With respect to an application having been made to the soldiers in the Barracks, the charge of procuring signatures to the petition h a d de volved upim . twenty•one Gentlemen, who had de clared, that n e ither •they themselves, nor any person in their behalf, had solicited or permitted the signal ore, of a .non-commissioned officer. It it had been done, it was without their authority. They had examined the list and not discovered the name of any non-commissioned officer. They had, hOwever, submitted the, list to the Officers themselves, t hat they toigh , t discover whether such names . were inserted, in order that they .might he expunged. Could.any thing he inure satisfactory than such conduct on their part 3 Mr:lityrcit IN SON had not acted on the autho rity of the public prints, but on that of 'a Regi . mental Older, issued by General Wilmot, in con sequence of lower. of a political nature having been' introduced Into the Artillery Barracks to grin the sig'hat ores of 'non-commissioned officers and soldiers. Ile then read the Order in question.. Me. rEpt, did 'nor t11•7r.11 to deny the ant henticity Of /l ia r d o enme H t. httt negeli that it did not refer either to the petition in question or to any other. The petition was then read, and laic! on the table. Mr. BuTLEtt ffres . ented a petition from Kilken ny in favour of the Catholic Claints.—Laid On the table, _ _ _ "Mr, Fl . DAVIS pre . sented a Petition f rom 101. agaitibt tine Cdthoiie ClAitus —L tit! 011 the table. Sir N. PARNELL saint,. that a very general feel ing prevailed tintong the Protestants oi Ireland iii flvonr of the Catholic Claims. Ile Alen presented aVetition front, the Catholics of Q.l-eett's County in favour ot their elailits.--=Laid on the table. 'Mr. PEEL itqw• presented a l'etition.front 5000 persons of thr gi,atest respectability rittipng the PrOlefirallti of Ireland, whose opiniotis wet e, that the majority of the l'rwestan.ta ot Ireland wo n l.l he ,found . to be against the 14:swinciPalion of the Roman Catholica. 'file Petition was trout the lit otestants of Dablin aiatl was ordered to b e laid on the table. Mr. GRATT4N said, that the concession of the Catholic Chinni was. not only necessat'y : to prevent the destrnetion of bt'otLerly love, but to the peace and strength Of I big country.. Mr. PARNBLLs4id, the greater lila of the Irish Prolstant Ntitions against the Catholics were signed by converted Catholics. Lord . KING•BOROUGH presented Peti:ions in fa- Your of the Catholics. Petitions were presented from Okeitampton and ,Weymouth against ;tie C•tt holies. POOll LAWS. Mr. S. 136trttNE 'be secant) reading of the Poor Laws'Bill to the io;h of May. SINKING FUND. Mr. GRF.NFRL.I. gave not tee, that immediately after the Report of the lio.k Committee should have been received, he should meniion the earliest diy pos , ible for sabmitting proposition to the llonse tending to make the Fond appli cable to the punlic service, in lieu of a loan. At the sitggesikni of the'CnAticELLott of the EXCIIMIJEK, General [-low consented to post pone hi. !motion respecting fines on town lands for illicit distillation I;11 to-mot tow. SALT DUTIES. Dr. PRILLImoRK moved, that the resolution of last year, that it was expedient to repeal the Salt Ditties, be read ; Which having been done, Ire said, that as the income of the country had in creased three millions over that of last year, be was unwilling to think that the new Parliament would refuse to relieve the country ft out tire very great Inutile') of the Salt Duties '.phis yies tiou was anost impOrtant, as it affected the agri culture, commerce, maritime strength, u'lidsocial habits ; and important, as it respects the finan cial state of the country. It was impo , sible to say that this tax did not also tam' the Poor-rates, since by iche vas taxed in his bread, butter. cheese, pork, and almost every article in lite. ibis tait was, in fact, the Income-tax on the poor. Besides, wherever this tax was imposed,lt was the fore rUnner of crime and of punishment. Ile read th e evidence of many Gentlemen bet Ore theCOmmit 'tee, to she'w that where sAlt was made, the prior employed in tire Manufacture, from its low price, would steal it ; and the farmer and shopkeepers were tempted to buy it. Bat these facts were, per haps, strong as they were, trifling, in comp' ison with the injury done' by this . t tx on the Fishe ries, the' nursery of our Seamen. It bad ap peared to the Committee that the Dutch, Nor wegians, and Danes, were rivalling ns in our own fishing grounds. it was impossible to col lect the revenue on this article without the most restrictive measnres. During the last year tire bonds entered into by gsh-ciirers amounted to upwards of 300,0001 It was therefore impossible that any hut great capitalists could enter into the .Fisheries. even the Secretary to the Admiral!y had given it as his opinion, that if the Salt Dillies were repealed, upwards of 20,000 'discharged Sea men would be placed in instant employment, If this Tax was, as he contended it was, essentially ‘erong, then those Taxes on the articles for which Salt was used must be unequal to the charges_ expected to he paid out ot them. As the Buy'get had not yet bceepresented, anti as new Taxes were spoken of, he wouhl not at present move for the repeal of this Tax, but would content himself with a _Resolution, contmemorating the opinions of the late Committee, and expressive of the gre a t grievance on the lower orders of the commitnit y ; arid he concluded by_moving a It eso lw ion to this etßict, that the earliest opportu nUy should be taken for the gradual repeal of this Tax. lion. Mr. DAVENPaRT agreed with all the opinions stated by the lion. and Learned G House ninthd find, by the Reports_of all (.;ouitnit 'lee.; on this subject, that they agreed in the int-' policy of the The belt Tax ,was con sidered by writers is originating in a most narrow-akinded . policy. It vyas hurtful . to. agricultme, destructive of the morals of,the peo,, ple, mud ruinous Pisheries.. Mr. WALLApn sa:ci, that unpopular its it might be, he must oppo,e the motion, on. the ground that the evil to be experienced trout the loss o.t great a branrh of levenne would he far ! ;seater than the nlie`f expected from it The House might take lip this ~ n bi,et at any time when the finances of the country would bear the repeal a 0 1 .15 taX, Would the people bear this tax with greater Clider fulness when they were told that it was a duty that ought to be abolished 1. Ile could dot , un derstand, the objections against this tax ; for if the revenue must be raised by taxation ; he saw no fairer mode of tax, than that of levying it on an article of the most _general consump. The objection of the French to this, taw was not so nitwit on its extent, but on the mode of its exaction, which was done not on what a man consumed, but on an estimate. of what he ought to consume ; which quantity he was. ob. lilted to boy from the Government. He admitted that this tax had great defects, such as the,faci ity it Leh) out to smaggling. Still this tax could, not be considered as unproductive, when it brings in a revenue of 1,500,000,1. a-year; besides, it was a tax easy and cheap at collection, as it cost no snore than two per cent. in its collection. ,e as a tax that bore on all ; and was of all others that which. was least complained of by the pour. Ile thought sufficient relict had been given to . agiil - as tar as salt is used in it,. by the maluction of the Tax already granted on Salt used in that branch of industry No man had a greater desire for the extension of the Fib cries than he had ; hut he did not believe, that this Tax acted as all itn- Pedinte‘nt to that extenston, lint if any reduction 'in the extent of thefi3heries had really taken place, it titan : have arisen liotut.* want of a market for our fish, instead of Ihe hardship of the : Salt Tax:— There never was a sooty prosperous year than _last the Fisheries. Ttielloa. Gentleman had.stated that the Dutch were able to undersell its itt the Owing to the cheapness of their salt. If the Hon Gentleinati hadittoked accurately to this part of s he sohjec , , he would have found the colt, icary to be the tact, and that theJ)inch : f7 - o h, i ns t ea d of lit'ing . cheaper than Eiiglish, were one third der tcr. t'lie hail, tinder the present . Salt.-laws, been able to meet all others in t hi markels ; and ,hetritsted, seeshoulii still be oble toil° so. The How Gent. had also stated authorities to prod• that, the Salt laws 10,olilie effect of d, moralizing the loWerclasses in thOse districts in which they most. prevailed.— als.r had anthmities ott the subject, those o f Mu'. ItittOn and Mr. Traffuid, by whore► it was , stye(' that they had no such effect.; as a proof of which it . appeared that out of 1,880 commit ments) which had tAten place in Cheshire in the last seven years, only 10 were for offences uni!er the Salt Laws. He. concluded by opposing the • , . Mr. tuawEte thought the Right Hon. Gent. who spoke last had taken.a very narrow view of the rpi”tiOU. The Ri g ht Hon. ( - ;'11( said that the lover orders did not feel this Tax. Did t,ot the Right lion. Gentleman know that four ounces of salt were required_ fur every .stone of flour in bread—that a family of five persons paid 245. a year for .his TAX ? Did not the Right [lon Gen tleman know that the Taxes on the.necessit ies of life presstid h•Arder on time lower orders than any other? 'This was not a moment to press for the repeal of this 'fax, oppressive and cruel as it was: but while he admitted this, he could not allow the argumeots of the ;light llonourahle Gendematt. As to the allusions which had been made to ate number of prosecutions for salt smuggling., it was filiaciorms. It was true that numbers of prosecu tions had been carried through, but how many had been compromised ? They amounted to thousands. Though he concurred with the Reso lution it) the main, he hoped the llonourahieatO Learrifq,GPritlelnan would agree, to. change the i.‘ gradual reduction " to " total redttc Hon." Ile would , vote (or the 1h •lutiou a t : eli events, but with much more pleasure if: - this amen d men t was agreed to. • • Dr FfitLumnße explained.--The Words of the Residlition were in the alternative. Lord EBFINGToN considered, that the c ountry Was indebted to the [too. Member, for the tmpiim which he brought before the 1 - f use. • The coun try would certsinly Lave been disoppointed, if, alter t h e investigations of ttvo Committees,• no thing shoirld have hem l)rouglit lorward this Ses sion, towards the repto:yal of a tax' which. lie price of the necessaries of line forty-I.ld. The first A c t, repealed by Lord Sidnionth during. his Ministry was it portion of the Salt Laws. `Vile late Pict was felt as, btolliensontellt the Westin Counties of England, and be as Weil as other Gentlemen from that part of the country.weie re tittestedto oppose its enactintot, , , . . _ Thej. - ,t t Ascpm.on of the EXCHEQuEtt eonld not believe that the influence of the ditty was iii jillflollS, when the agricultural, the twoitirictnr and the trading interests of the community were improve). Toe honourable Member who h a d spoken last but oue, hat mentioved .facts, which were not substantiated, relative to the pro .ectnions of persons under the Salt Laws. There were, accordiug ro him, a thousand cases of .00111.. promises, but he had forgotten that.• in -the Re port - printed by order of the House this year,. the number of casfs amounted only tot welve re specting the fi , b 'corers, and Thitty-five-formis. aliptleatioaB, including all the compromises. The observation relative to the Bond Duty was incor rect ; for from a authentic source it. was evident that great improvement in the fish trade had occurred within the last three years. A new market for that article was opened in the:East Indi e s, where a qtmoity had been sent, and whi ther more was expected to be sent next year.— Ile was •far. (tom feeling favourable to the mu tiott for every new, motion, which like the pie sent could not fail of being unproductivx in el. feet, whileit tended to render. the Tax mtious, and the Revenue less productive, .caused a stag nation in trade, and couttiboted to injure many. He Should Therefore .trespass no tor;ller on he House, but would conclude by moving, the pie- Stioos question. • Some further .discussion took .placej in which Lord Compton, Mr. Wilbrabint Egertoo, Mr, Alderman Heygate, and .Mr. Crippi, expressed their:intentioos of voting for the Previous . ques tion ; while Mr. D. Gilbert, Mr...Protheroe, and Sir C. Butrell spoke briefly, in favour of the origi hal !Doi , Doctor THILLIMORE. replied. After ti!e Hon. Gentleman concludde►l, tl%e (! vided— . .. • For the original Two ion 5O . For the previous qiii,..t ion 127 Majority for Nllnisters• —77 . '- :.. i CIIATIGF'AGA , INT :AN 11;I, irl JUI),CriE. 3 1 Mr. .11.. i NI A lITIN said, that at that infeliour of kiletdeening, li': witiact! to economise fis 4 nrotli• of the time of the House as tie could ; be Should therefore simply state the object of leis minion) vvhicil was, that the Potter -Officer be ordered f° lay before the Ilouse a copy of the bill of iodicv . ment found at the Session of Over and Terminer , held at Dublin in September, 11114, agrtitt , t E P ttitinti Burke, an Attorney., for and c ortort perjury, together with the verdict of the J4ttli and the allidatits made for the postponril ° e the trial. His Charge against M. Baron M`L' l ", lan was, that be had not postponed the t rial "L Burke, on the production Of certain affidavit' mad by Girnsetl and others, stating the ill health anti imposSibiity of att•endauce of certa:n wi t " nesses• on the part of the prosecution, whielt befr Mr. Martio,hiad institored; Sir G. 111;A: detended\ I ron . M‘Lellan frOtil charges brought against hint; and read a . k s irt e l statement (tribe Ltarned.Jodge, giving ) , flat. a t ", pointed contradiction tO every eiretitos:arice tioned by Mr. Martin, and also charging 1 ° :; Gentletti:6n with having offere.d him the Most i'er' ss . persontil , insults. After a f-e - sv words from Mr. , Brownlartr. C. Grant, Mt. be,die Foster, and L u r 1 Castle' reagh, all against . the mfition, ti t ) made! long reply, whit h.threw'the into en ova , ' . ,iOll3, by -a WO:" extraordinatv detail of his dal svabbles,,in the .cont se.ni•which -he compel'', Ctl Baraii Af`lLtdlah to a 11,+1e tr, 8 " (1 a tiger tor his. y ; he was Cal),A to 0: der h,,„ the .Speaiter vr • . . The motion was negatived % , t it 1101“ diViii(ll"' and tie tietter .orders tit the d,-. 7 posed of, the I.°ll' LAW lINT'IsELLIGENCE. COMIT OF CHANCERY;-Await, 29, .111,ENHk:01. DAVIS Z 1 Hta GRAC_E THE TWEE OF MARLEOZ9" I : : •This tens au ,Tplication tor the Ais , fltarge foriner.adcr of the Court, a'ploilltmg of rtTlifS of • 11.1eWicim. , 1,oiLse,.. The to „ivat had been.. made some time .-t;zo, and stow! fr•r ihe joilgthent of the Lord thaneeflor , . - Lordship now sta:ed; that the - 4p!ication f° r i ; • reoeiver had beenmade:on' the, ground, thatto. estate being in the posiession of j,i'dgment Cr e. &tors, the present plaint,ff, who hail otITY ar equitable claim, could not proceed by a e r o ); • meg at• law, and was th e r e f ore , obliged to It' to a Court of eqnity for rebel. ; awl t h e re c() od he no doubt that under suf h cirettiusta ,, ce s t -Court would interpose. it was - true that .is property was to be viewed as under certai • l'eg.l l. • fat ions imposed by ACE-of Parliament ; ba r 1 ' I it it il appear to hint, that if a judgment credit.,, could take . possession of Illen - IvArn-hotise Wn-mlstock, an equitable 'tenant 'had as g!. , '" l right to derao, 0 11 ri tht IN ,; nt, however, it- tv l l unnecessary for hint to tr ou bl e the C(!tirt• mullets:owl that the Duke of 'Marlborough in t.lls . case had offered by his answers to poY ! he hall itsyo si ; but bn i l i t t e li t t e r i t s ie l : let oti t e o r k ii i: j o , w is . ft wohst.,wtehie.sr,alsil fo t3„r::[,re. the annuity a burden on the evate• ' 1 " ) : ;- therefore, reserve the decision as the di itli ' r • of tbe receiver mum ii he had looked et the . :titswe rs .". His Lordship then desire ! ' the answers to be ed to him, - attil t•nid ice thonid Inr h over then) (l ' a c ; and it any of the parties ,-7 o ld wait `: c hint to-rnom;w wonting, beforehe IGH: I , t - House i r ..aortk, he shoull-tcl4, theur,w, , - discharged the Older Or 'thit. begged it to be understood, that he ljt"' • giviug..no opinion whatever as to the c s es ie : ': tile timber, &e. ; but was contiitirn; his; vie"' el' thely to the consideration, ‘‘ b ot h,- , ht , looking to the interests and rijlits o f t h e bell' peCtant, would grant a receiver. or nor. COURT OF KING' 25. CRIMINAL INFOIINIATION. 713 , SING V I'VE'. AND DAVI,'NoN..pfaR 3 •. - A Rale Was obtained r lase (~1 a Lt. nal iiiroima4 ag Aust . the t!et enrta ctt,‘ for *ell id . log a challenge to as Geutletnao 'mord F1(1% er , 11' consequenceot sim.e IrAnsact l ollB t ;:e ' c worth Election.—[l'he circuipsraco:e; of have been already detailed to the public, and " been reported throngh•the mediuni of THE Mr. Gyatitay, thk day,, in arguing against rule, ittged the youth of Mr Peel, and the tion of his mind, in cooßtlttencP Of a : , ,uppo•e ti t n stilt to his. father, as excuses for his clients' cc) ; 1 ; duct.—Mr.SCARIATT was heard in support o ti Hole, •Oiicli was snide absolute..--The JUS.TICE and Mr. BAYLEY being f a vnur• el granting the Rule, and Mr. justice Davi.' against it. Mr. Justice UoLaoYD was absent. .• SHOCKING ACCIDENT IN 'Mitt 11011017GEL" ---Vt l : t erday an legnisltion b e hi at tie. Tho' 3s Hospital, in the I.3‘,rough,- before THorsiNs ToN, E•ui , Coroner for London; on stew ot 111 , 0 , boAies ot Wm. Smith and Samuel Strachan, Vir , of the unfortunate persons who perished at th e cident which occurred at the house of Mr.SMilb er t inan,Whitestreet,Borough. No new fact Caine pr e in evidence, but two engineers 'agreed that ty, engine was one not only defective and tice4 e , i ;,- but one of the woist and ,most dangerous ‘,10,, scription, being ahi is pressure engine. The i, roner said shell engines were subjects of ment. Verdict-" Died by the butaliteg ot big, pressure steam-engine." , A few days since, an extraord,ittary . eirc.Of stance took place in the nee - glibonrhoir d t Limerick. A man, named John`' Ket t,' ". I n • was employ,ed to purchase feather's ihr °fi r o t the &marry, called at a fartite;i* 11011Sep " p .' haring agreed for the feathers of hie gee“t, "" f c . - - .tfleDeed the operation sit plucking, by t in gande'r's . bead under his kit arin—tl b ird ' o order to retaliate for its storetings, bit the Innon desperately, that in a d•-y or r-so. a intitti licdt in ‘r took p'ace, and he die,: in the too4t excli'ici dt agoity, ___------- _ • DIF.O. , , e rt, - I in the s7ih year a her age, , 0:1 the 2Gth inst. in St. J.so)es's-placP, St. James'" s e ss 1' I)owa4rr P,;uiett. - ' ii y Hells Ott the 28th nit: aged (35. Lieut.-Colo-net Jubn 4 . , bait : pay thith Regiment of Foot.- ' co g re li ' . LaNDON: Printed by.). B. CARSTAIBS, of O. —.' It'.'i' • ' ,''' the lo g bt H o n. Mar), CUtlllt Ormond-street. Queen-square; a i m i s ohtished OY ~t 4,, g'• SCRIPI'S, of No. 7, South IVlolti,n-st:ert, at V•a'Ze'it (Mi. :et No. 112. ,titrami ;, ..srittitie.Atit-ettiscu l enti, " . Litt:JO, &c, iyest - -puid) must be add:l:tied. • ~. ~. 't!,, A ‘„, l phi 1,. i; n, 4 1i f s ' 1 0%.