The Sun. — London, England, 1828-02-21 00:00:00

bargains in the labour market as possible, could coolly approve of the proposition that it is good that the as and manufacturing labourers should be ;round to wretchedness. The opinion that the sufferings and privations of the lower orders from low wages arc beneficial to a country, is so absurd, to leave inhumanity out of the question, that we 'cannot persuade ourselves it was actually uttered by one so lately charged with the interests of the people of thse Islands. The enlightened author of the " Wealth of Nations " had. very different ideas as to what constitutes the good of a country. " Ser vants, labourers, and workmen of different binds," he observes, " make up the far mater part of every great political society. But what improves the cir cumstances of the greater part, can never be regarded as an inconveniency to the whole. No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which by far the greater part of the members are poor and Miserable. It is but equity, besides, that they ssh 6 feeds elothe, and lodge the whole body of tha peetqa, should have such a share of the produce of their owa labour, as to he themselves tolerably Well led; clothed, and lodged." Does Mr. S. Rice imagine the agricultural and Tila• nufacturing laboumrs of England are at this present time so much tr.ore than tolerably Well fed, clothed, and lodged, 'that the good of the country requires that thir condition should be lowered by an influx of Sts:angers ? Did his researches in the Home OTice lead him to the conclusion, that the extraor thnary increase of crime of late is a oreaf of the ex cessive prosperity of the lower otders ? Does he be lieve, if there is such an extra Ordinary prosperi ty among the labourers, that the good of the countmv requires it should be diminished, by the increased competition caused by increased numbers, that the tendency of the labouring classes to increase whenever thee - have the means of supporting their families, will not in all razes, in old settled countries, produce the addi tioaal numbers required, as rapidly as is compatible v:aith the good of the country ? Does he believe that the people of England are e stupid as to sup pose that, because it may be the interest of an Irish Landholder to rid himself of part of his redundant po pulation, by threiaing them on England, that it is therefore the interest of England that her agricul tural and manufacturing labourers sh add be de graded, by the competition created by such in flux of strangers, to the level of Irish wretchedness? - But Mr. Spring Rice could not have u creel the sen timent ; because the English Menth e isof the House are not so destitute of huiettity, as to have listened with patience to lam,Snage unworthy of a rational being. They walla have marked their abhorrence in some uneouiviacal manner. As to the question of the introduetion of Poor Laws into Ireland, the op poaition of Irish Members to' any such introduction is more excusable, however inexcusable it may he in the English Membera, as guardians of the people, to suffer them to be sacrificed to the interest of Irish Luidholders. The English Members are bound to protect the agticult oral and mantheturing classes of England against the calamity which is assailing them from Ireland, and to disregard the howling of inte rested laitdowiters. " The excess," says Mr. M'Cul - loch, in his new edition of Smith's Wealth of Ara tio-as, with the notes and additions necessary to put the reader in possession of the present state of the science of Political Economy, " the excess to which population has now arrived in Ireland, and time time misery of the inhabitants, threatens, by caus ing an extraordinary emigration from Ireland to Great Britain, to have the most pernicious influence on the condition of the labouring classes here. This is indeed tt subject of paramount importance, and Which calls loudly for the immediate attention of Government. If the existing sources of pauperism he left to flow unchecked 'in Ireland, and to seek a vent. for themselves, it is not easy to see how we shall be able to prevent ourselves from being overrun by them. . . . • . A double injury is, in consequence, inflicted upon the native population of Britain. In the first place, their wages are reduced by the competition of the Irish; and in the second place, their - opinions with respect to what is necessary for their comfortable and -de cent subsistence, are lowered by the contaminating influence of example, mai by familiar intercourse with those who are content to live in filth' and mi sery. I am - finely persuaded that nothing so deeply injurious to the character and habits of our people has ever;otcurred,aa the late extraordinary influx of Irish la . bowers ; and yet thisiufluxmaybe said to be only com mencing)." Have the Poor Laws' in England ten ded to keep do men the numbere of the .People, or have they not ? If they have k e pt d own th e umnbere of the people, by the derided interest which they. gave to per Sons of property to guard against redundancy, of which the charge had to be borne by them, what reason is there for supposing that Poor Laws would not have the same effect in Ireland ? If Ireland ever come to be civilized, it must have Poor Laws; fot we contend that mendieity is incompatible with civilization, and that vagrancy must prevail where ever a provision of. some sort is not made for the destitute poor. Till of late years the Poor Laws of England were always held to have been a check on population ; and if they have ceased to be so efficacious a check as formerly, it is because the provisions which enabled them to pro duce this effect, were inconsiderately repealed in our times. •In a debate in the House of Commons, April 28, 1773, on a Bill to prevent vexatious re movals of the Poor, according to the Parliamentary History, Mr. Graves, in. moving for leave to bring hi this Bill, said, " How inconsistent is it with rea son that. young, hale, vigorous men, whether la bourers in agriculture or manufactures, who ale well able to maintain themselves —nay, more than able sti do it—should, on their offering to marry, have notice from. time parish officers that they shall remove them, as likely to become chargeable ? Is not this of all other means the most efectual to pre vent- and check population ? ,A ud did ever any nation 'under heaven grow great by checking popu lation ? • Suppose, Sir, the couple, in spite of this infamous notice, should persevere in their intention amid marry ; they are removed. Gentlemen may say what harm in that.? Why not live in one parish as well as another? I will tell such Gentlemen wherein is the mischief : the removal carries them from a place where they can earn lbs. a week by manufactories, to another where they can get but lOs.by agriculture." &c, Mr. Whit Worth said," Sir, I have known, to the amount of 30 or 10 families sent off by removal orders in one day,a scene highly scandalous,and urging iii the strongest manner the necessity of the Bill.' Who does not see, that harsh as tliia - state of the taw at first sight seems to be, it 'was, ia reality, kind to the labouring classes ? It furnished the single man with the strongest notions - for carefulness and fru gality, in order that by acquiring a settlement through the various modes prescribed, he might se eine himself, if diaposed to marry, against removal from a place where he was earning fifteen s hilli ngs, to another place'where he could get but ten shillings. very oste acquainted with the c oun tr y pasts of England, knows that the labourers on sufferance in parishes, were generally models in all that regarded. 'industry and good conduct. But, by a spurious li berality, the fruit of imperfect knowledge of:the social system, and little insight into human nature, the labouring poor have been deprived of the chief motives for prudence and exertion. The single man , so far from having to dread any thing from has atpres ent a bonus, by marriage,. entering . into that condition. But the Irish Landholders purposely confound the abuses of the English Poor Laws, which have been engrafted on them of late years, with the laws themselves. They f orget t h at un d er these laws the fi nes t race of. lalsoirreakin the world tr y-, dexterity, for habits of for laborious indua were formed ' • order-and cleanliness, S ,arace which .even yet, in their deteriorated condition, have not —2tforiang Chick. . , equals in Europe. Although Lord Salisbury's Bill to " legalize the sale of game" is on a more restricted principle than we could wish, yet we should be glad to see that or any measure pass into a law which is calculated to work some amelioration in the present system of Game Laws. The mischievous effects of this branch of our . Penal Legislation upon the habits and morale of the peasantry of England call for the moat serious attention of Parliament. To prevelit the destruction of game by poachers the experimrnt of excessive severity has already been tried, and has signally faded. It is time to adopt another course, and try whether reconciling this part of our legis lation mote with reason and natural right tnay not have a better result than the most rigorous, or ra ther vindictive enactments. Nor have those enact ments failed on account of any neglect or remissness in carrying them into effect—for never Were laws of so harsh a nature more harshly executed. Of late years, especially, the proceedings at Quarter Ses sions throughout the kingdom afford abundant evidence cf the extreme severity with which Ma gistrates deal out the full rricasiire of punishment which those laws allow them to inflict upon the class of offender; to which they apply ; and yet the offence: instead of being abated, is considerably on the increase. The boldness of action and reckless ness of life which poachers now display exceed all that was ever known before. The desperate and tco often fatal affrays between numerous and or ganized bands of these depredators and game- keeper are becoming more frequent in propor tion as more veheMent measures of • intimidation are pursued: It is vain to suppose that poach ing can be repressed while the sale of game is pro hibited, and while there is a constant demand 'for it in the market, and, consequently, a high premium upon poaching. Let the sale of game be once le galized, and this premium will be diminished, just as smuggling any prohibited article of foreign mer chandize declines when that article is allowed 'to be imported at a moderate duty. We therefore ap prove of Lord Salisbury's. Bill, as far as it recog nizes the principle of legalizing the sale of game; but we object to it the confining the operation of that principle under too narrow restrictions. The Bill does not allow game to be killed or sold by per sons who are not qualified by a property of at least 1001. a year. This is to erect a monopoly in place of a prohibition ; we would rather that the Bill was grounded on the principle proposed by Lord Wham cliffe—namely, that the right to game should be co existent with the right to land—for can there be any thing more against reason or natural justice than that a person occupying and cultivating land shall be liable to be treated as a criminal if he should kill or make profit of any wild animal that lives upon the produce of his land? But Lord Salisbury's Bill will not relieve persons so circumstanced from the penalties of the Game Laws unless they happen to have 100/. a year—an invidious distinction between the richer and poorer farMers. still we think the measure ought to be supported, as the beginning of nip! ovement.—Morning Herald. A Morning Contemporary put forth a statement yesterday relative to an impression having gone abroad in the. City that " the accession of the Duke of Welliogton to the Ministry is far from being sa tisfactory to the Russian Government." In answer to this truly-ridiculous assertion, we shall only ob serve that it is absolutely untrue. Nosuch impression has gone abroad, but, on the contrary, it is gene rally believed that the Noble Duke's accession to power will be peculiarly acceptable to the Emperor of Russia, and to the Continental Powers in gene ral. It is quite impossible that the story of the accession of the Duke of Wellington to the Ministry hieing unsatisfactory to the Emperor of Russia, should be entertained by any man of common sense, for this single reason—namely, 110 intelligence can have been received from St. Petersburgh in reply to the announcement of his Grace's appointment. We have noticed this silly invention for no other pur-; pose than to show the shifts which a certain disap pointed party bare 'recourse to in order to run down the Duke of Wellington.. But it will not do--all their efforts will prove abortive ; and we have no hesitation in saying, that, if ,hiS‘ Grace pursues the sane straight-forward course lie did in the Array, and that he has hitherto done in the Government, he will be one of the most popular Ministers that. ever directed the Councils of Great Britain.—lbid. tend to be his peculiar friends ought not to fix upon this monient4ry aberration as the basis of his politi cal character, in opposition to the general tenor of his political life.—Morning Post. Two trials for libel took place yesterday, one in the Court of Exchequer, the ether in the King's Bench. The action before the Exchequer was, ' brought by a clergyman named Cummings against the Proprietors of the Bath Herald, for a report of certain proceedings before the Grand Jury in August last. The paper, it seems, described the crime charged against the Rev. Gentleman, on which a true bill had been found, as "an indelicate assault," whereas the terms used by the Gra►►d Jury were merely an " assault." •For this slight deviation from the plain matter of fact statement, Mr. Cummings brought his action, and the proprietors brought the female, a married woman (the plaintiff is also mar ried), upon whom the assault was committed. IL was not of a very aggravated character. The Jury, however, thought there was a little indelicacy, in a clergyman and a married man, and gave a verdict for the defendant on all the counts. The trial in the King's Bench, which occupied the whole day, was on a criminal information, at the instance of Lord • Wallace, against Mr. Barber Beaumont, and, notwithstanding the host of evidence, especially do cumentary, produced, turned, entirely on the fact whether the following words, in a letter of Mr. Beaumont to Lord Wallace,were a challenge to tight : " I know that, however atrocious your acts maybe, I can have no legal redress, nor the alternative which a per son in the rank of society of a gentleman is entitled to claim from another in the same rank who has basely calumniated him. This alternative, to which I should long since have resorted, had your acts not been surrounded by the halo of privilege, I will not for obvious reasens name ; but I think there is no breach of privilege in my at length de manding of you, either to justify your acts, or to give me the best reparation in your power." The Jury, after four hours' deliberation, found Mr. Beaumont guilty.—New Times. It was currently reported yesterday, in certain cir cles in the west end of the town, that the Master of the Mint was in possession of secrets which would • utterly refute the charges made against him in the House of Lords, and . that he was only restrained front giving publicity to those secrets front a wish not to embarrass the Duke of 'Wellington, as the necessary consequence would be the immediate re tirement of several Members of the present Govern ment. In giving this report, we do not mean to impute its origin or its circulation to Mr. Herries ; Isis friends may be over-hasty, they may be injudi cious, but we think it behoves that gentleman at once to tell all he knows, at whatever hazard, or frankly to confess that he has no more to tell. He cannot pretend to be ignorant that he and Lord Goderich are directly at issue with regard to the causes that led to the recent dissolution of the Cabinet, and he can as little disguise from himself the fact that his remaining in the Cabinet along with Mr. Huskisson, has been received by the public almost universally as a proof that the statement of Lord Goderich is the only statement to be relied on. If, therefore, the Master of the Mint have any respect for his own character, he will do well to act as we have advised hint, front no vain and craving► curiosity, but with the honest desire of Englishmen to see justice done where it is due.—lbid. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. UNION-HALL.—Captain J. K. Hulbort, of the Germait Legion, was brought up by Snow, the beadle of Newington, for the purpose of having a bastard child affi liated on him. The mother of the child, a fine bouncing lass, on being sworn, de - posed that the defendant was the father. The defendant, a foreigner, and a man of exceedingly di minutive size, on hearing the declaration of the woman, shrugged up his shoulders and shook his bead, which the Magistrate observing, said, that now was his time to state anything be had to say respecting the im,iness. " Don't you think," added the Magistrate, " you are the father of the child she has sworn to you ?" The. defendant again shrugged up his shoulders, and, in broken English, said, " Look at my face, me uo like the child: Upon any conscience I think there is one other father besides me." The Eail of Morley and other friends of the late Mr. Canning seem to have thought it necessary to vindicate their conduct in lending their support to the.Adininistrition of the Duke of Wellington. We wonder A had not occurred to them, that be , these anxious vindicatious of themselves they be come 'substantially the assailants, the most affective assailants, of the character 'of their deceased friend. , Is there any doubt whatever that the prhiciples of those Administrations as an. adjunct or member of which the whale political life of Mr. Canning, with the unfortunate exception of two or three months .at the close of it, was passed, - are embodied and revived in the present Government'? Why, then, should his friends and adherents apologize just now for- affording their support to precisely such a Government - as Mr. Canning himself supported, 9r to speak more properly, was incorporated. with during his whole political life ? Do they mean to lend their sanction to the slander, clothed in the "garb of praise,'by which the Whigs and Liberals, for .their own base purposes, perpetually strive to under mine and destroy the character of a really great man, great in all things save 'his momentary connection with them ? Do they mean to favour the calumnious insinuation which pervades:every speech uttered by a Whig or a Liberal, that throughout his • political life their deceased friend was a hypocrite for the sake of place-e.that he joined Administration after Administration, with which his principles were not congenial—that he was a man perpetually on the watch to overthrow the system of politics of which he was the ostensible coadjutor, and was thought in some instances by many persons to be the too zealous coadjutor ; that he had two opposite sets of principles ; one open and avowed for his. official Colleagues— the other Cabalistical, and to be diacovered only by the initiated in the occult science of liberality—that, in short, he was the most finished specimen of Jesuitism that has ever been exhibited upon earth. Do they 'mean, we repeat, to lend the weight of their authority to these calumnies of. the liberal schpol? If they do, they act rightly in apologising for their adherence to the Ministry of the Duke of Wellington. If they do not, they will act rightly in supporting the Ministry of the Duke of Wellington, and leaving the cpnstruction of their conduct to the unassisted common sense of mankind. We present the subjeet in this point of view, because we see in the speech of Mr. Tierney, in the House of Com mons, on the night of explanation, when nothing of importance was explained, and in many other cir cumstances, clear indications thafa dispute is about to arise, whether the Whigs abdicated their prin ciples in joining Mr. Canning, or Mr. Canning and the other Members of the preceding Government, in accepting their assistance, abdicated theirs. We are not about to advocate either party. They both, as we have often said already, acted wrong. Hut on which side was the dereliction of principle the most manifest—which paity was a paramount, and which the subordinate, in the new arrangement? Mr. Tierney says lie had for a year and a half previous to their junction sup ported tile principles of Mr. Canning in the House of The wife of a person, ostler at one of the inns, Conirnons. Verbally he is right, because during •in Wainflect, left her husband's house on Wednesday week, that period no commotion internal or external had accompanied by a man from. the 'neighbourhood of Whit ' Occurred. H a d there been a Manchester riot du- tlesea. The fugitives having carried off about 20/. in ring the'period he could not have said so. His co- money, principally in silver and half sovereigns, and several incidence with Mr. Canning was a coincidence for other portable articles, the property of the husband, were fair weather —arid for more than eighteen months quickly pursued by the latter, attended by a constable; but the political atmosphere had bees clear. He had having, in the first instance, taken a wrong direction, they coincided, bec ause li e cou ld not help i t. He h a d did not come up with the game till Su n d ay , w h en the were overt a ken at Beverley. O n re t urn i ng f ro m opposed whenever the re was t h e l east sem bl ance of runaways after dinner, they were surprised t o find th e hus artopportunity. He a , in conjunction with others walk of his had in Patty , opposition to, Mr. Can- band, seconded by the proper authorities. The offenders were lodged in the gaol for the night, and brought before ring compelled. the present C o l on i a l S ecretary the Magistrates, at the Guil dh a ll, t h e following morn to discharge the duties of. two offices 'for the salary ing. After the case was gone into, the husband ex of one. He had .deteirnined !to•support Parliamen- pressed his willingness to forgive his frail rib, and take her tary Reform and the Repeal of the'Test'Act, in op- again into favour, provided she would agree to such an position to Mr. Canning, whenever th ose su bj ec t s arrangement!. To the surprise of every one present, she should be broached. He Was •in all respects, as a obstinately refused to consent. The gallant ( an e ld e rly, politician', the antipode to Mr. Canning, unless the undersized, ordinary looking fellow) was next remon strated with. He promised not to go intentionally latter had throughout his whole life been a consum where the woman was but if she came to him, he mate hypocrite. The plain feet is, that the Whigs would not desert h er . Aft er much alter ca ti on , th e f ra il Canning, becaus e t h ey extolled the liberality of Mr. offender was given up to the husband,• along with what were determined, if,possible, to get Into place under money remained (121. or 141.), and the other articles be the Widow of his wing. He spurned them s and longing to him, and the man was detained until the follow used the m ; and it is a blot. Bat those who pre- ing day. —Boston Ga z ifte, 4 k,•44 to' Mots , said that the defendant had always kept his pay ments up for the maintenance of the child uutil within the last fortnight. ,MaursTaaTE.—That fact is an acknowledgment of hie beiugthe father. Defendaut.—She very much frightened me by saving she would expoae me, and to save my reputa. tion I did pay money. . . Macitraarx.---What allowance is the defendantable to make; we must know his circumstances. Woman.—He is an independent gentleman. Defendant.—l have only Captain's half-pay to live un, and support six children. Mactsra.trz.—Are all those children born in wedlock ? Snow.—They are all bastards, Sir. MAGISTRATE (to the defendast.)-;—Do you deny having had intercourse with the woman ? Defendant. _No, no ; 1 nu deny that ; ..but 1 do think somebody else have one finger in de pie as well as myself. • The MaGisraArEs ordered the defendant to pay 4s. 6d. a week for the support of the child. SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. LIVERPOOL.' TUESDAY, Frs. 19.—High water 40 min. past one.— Wind S.S.E.—Arrived the Minerva, Grover, from Trieste : Liffey, Henderson, from Drogheda, with grain ; I,lritanuia, Connell, from Sligo, do. ; Swift, Leonard, from Dunkirk, with flax ; Manchester (steamer), Penn, from Dublin, with sundries; Britannia (steamer), Harper,' do. do. ; Win. Huskisson (steamer), Lindsay, from Greenock, do. ; Tiger, Marshall, from Glasgow, do. ; Enterprise (steamer), Crawford, do. do. ; the Countess of Lonridale (steamer), Marshall, front Whitehaven, do.; Oscar, ..—, from Bristol, do. ; Comet (steamer), Phillips from Dublin, with the mail. , CLEARED' OUTVARDS.—Mary Stewart, Smith, for Rio de Janeiro.; Salem, Richardson, for New York ; Majestic, Page, for ditto; Caledonia, M'Gregor, for St. Thomas and Matanzas ; Elizabeth, Nelson, for St. Domingo ; John,, Reid, Rea,_ for Havannah ; Irishman, Lowden, for Douglas.. Telegraph Office, Feb. 19. HoLvrizan.—..Wind this morning South, light breeze, nothing more to report. POINT LYNAS.—Nos. 6 and 3 Pilot boats off; nothing more to report. GREAT ORRIS HEAD.—One brig off, homeward bound, has not Shown her number. VOEL NAUT, or GOLDEN GROVE..--At 3 15, outward bound vessels that sailed this day are Eastward of floating light, near. the N.E. buoy; at 1 10 p.m. wind at Holy head South, bloWing. fresh. AN AGED VETERAN.—There is now iivillg at Biahopton, near Ripon, in the 104th year of bis ate, one FRANCIS Wrucuisow, who was a soldier at the taking o f Bellisle, in 1760, and served under the brave ELLIOTT, at the siege of Gibraltar. After his discharge from the army, he worked at Bishopton Corn Mill till eld age brought him to be a dependant on that • township. • For these last four or five years. he has been blind, but his faculties are good, and he appears to be as sound at heart as ever, and will talk the day through about ELLIorr and Gibraltar.— York Courant. LAW INTELLIGENCE COURT OF KING'S BENCH, FEB, THE- KING U. BEA UMONT. This was an infortnation against Mr. Barber Beaumont, one of the Directors of the County Fire-office, for a libel contained in a letter, addressed to Mr. Wallace (now Lord Wallace), calculated to provoke him to fight a, duel. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL stated the case, the particu lars of which are already before the public. A Commis aion was appointed by Parliament to inquire into the state of • the revenue, of which Commission Mr. Wallace was nominated as Chairman, and in the reporr, which emanated from this Commission, some statements were made respecting the County Fire-Office, which were not agreeable to the Directors of that Company, as it involved a charge of fraud, on the part of the Fire-Office, against the Revenue. Soon after the report of the Com missioners of Inquiry was printed, Mr. Barber Beaumont addressed a petition to the House of Commons, com plaining of the report of the Commissioners, and Mr. Wallace defended himself from those charges in his place in the House of Commons. Mr. Barber Beaumont however, was not satisfied with this appeal to Parliament, but wrote the letter in question in May, 1827; evidently for the purpose of provoking that gentleman to fight a duel. The Learned Gentleman then went through the letter, commenting on the most striking passages as he pro. ceeded, and concluded by observing, that if public func tionaries, like Commissioners of Inquiry, were not pro tected from such attacks as were contained in Mr. Beau mont's letter, there was an end to the utility of such in quiries, an 4 Parliamentary commissions becaine'a useless expense. Lord Wallace sworn and examined by the SOLICITOR GENERAL said—l acted as one of the Commissioners under the Acts of Parliament, (the Ist and 2d' Geo. IV.) ; I afterwards, with the other Commissioners, made a report in writing. The report produced is that which I made; the report is made to the Commissioners'of the Treasury ; three copies are made ; one for the King and two to be laid on the tables of the two Houses of Parliament. The report is entitled the 14th Report of the Com missioners of Inquiry ; on the Ist June I received a letter bearing the signature of Mr. Barber Beaumont.— I received it at my own house in Portman-square.-- It was handed to me by soy servant, and was in an enve lope, addressed " to the Right Hon. .T. Wallace, 33, Port man-square." The letter now produced was that I re ceived. Cross•examined by Mr. PoLtom—l cannot say what particular day the report was laid on the table of the House of Commons. I was long a Member of the House. The report was printed. It is usual to print such reports. A number are printed for the use of the Mem bers of the House ; I believe a great many are printed, but I don't know. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL observed, that a great many more, he believed, were printed than were ever read. Cross-examination continued—l believe the printed re ports get before the public, and get into the newspapers. There was a copy of the evidence taken before the Com mission accompanying the report, and laid on the table. Amongst - others there was the evidence of a person named Hubbard. An application was made to tbe Commissioners for the form of the oath, with the view of indicting Hub bard for perjury. The fact was, that some of the evidence was taken on oath, and-some was not. There was a letter written in October, 1826, requesting the form or the oath put to Hubbard, and a subsequent application was made in consequence of an order from the Treasury. There was a reference from the Treasury, upon which communication was made to Mr. B. Beaumont by the Commissioners. A petition was presented to the House of Commons on the 10th April by Mr. Hobhouse, containing charges against me, which I answered in my place. The evidence was contained in the Appendix, and the Report and Ap pendix were printed together. Re-examined—Mr: B. Beaumont's own testimony forms part of the Appendix; the Commissioners received letters from Mr. Barber Beaumont pending the investigation ; those letters were printed with the Appendix. Mr. Jacob Thomas examined by Sir JA M ES SCA FLETT— Proved the hand-writing of Mr. Barber Beaumont in dif ferent letters. Goss-examined—Witness has seen Mr. Beaumont sign ing cheques some years ago. The letter containing the alleged libel was the❑ pat in and read, together with extracts from the printed Report of the Commissioners of Inquiry, in reference to the County Fire Office. The libel chiefly purported that the Right Honour able Thomas Wallace had received were hearsays and calumnies directed against the County •Fire Office, as evidence, and had even laboured to give them an air of truth by his practices on the Office clerks, encouraging the discarded ones to vituperate their employer, and endea vouring to extract from the honest clerks admissions foreign to their meaning, by worrying and intimidating' them, tic. After the libel had beeisread, Mr. V. Pot.r.oct addressed the Jury on the part of the defendant. The Arroarier-GEtartat having replied, Lord 'l'Errer•.nzx shortly summed up, leaving it to the Jury to say whether or no the letter was written with an intent to provoke a breach of the peace. The Jury remained locked up until nearly ten o'clock, when they returned into Court, and pronounced a verdict of " Guilty." The trial occupied the entire day, from' half-past nine o'clock. Lord Wallace sat on the Bench from the "com mencement until after the sununing up at nearly six ticlack. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FEB. :W. THE TRUSTEES OF TIIE BRITISH MUSEUM V. WHITE. Mr. Parrzasorr opened the pleadings. Mr. Sergeant Wir:nE (assisted by Mr. Courts) stated, that this Lase was an issue directed by the Court of Chan cery, to decide whether a person named William White, did or did not legally execute his will so as to make it a valid instrument for the conveyance of his freehold pro perty to the trustees of the British Museum. The testator was a person who, during his life, had pursued the study of the law, and in December, 1822, a few months previous to' his death, he made the will in' question, by which having given a life interest to his wife and child, he devised a con siderable portion of his freehold property to the Trustees of the British Museum. The wife and child were since dead, and the plaintiffs, agreeably to the conditions of the will, claimed the property in question; but the heir at law dis puting the validity of the will, proceedings were taken in .the Court of Chancery, vidien the present case arose, which that Court directed should be brought into this Court for the decision of a jury. The will was then put in and read. It was in . two sheets, and the names of the attesting witnesses appeared only to be attached' to the last. Mr. Justice PA MC, in summing up, said that the great point for the decision'ef the jury was, whether they were satisfied, froM whatliad appeared, that the two pieces of paper upon which the will was written were at the same time in the r resence of the witnesses at the respective places at which they were signed. This would be the first ques tion ; and the next would be, whether all the witnesses knew at tle time of signing that the document was a will. The Jury returned a deitlitt for the plaintiffs, being of opinion that both pieces of paper were in the room at the same time, and that both were signed by thetestator. . • CONSISTORY COURT, FEB. 20. Dr. LUSHINGTOW took his seat to-day u Judge of this Court. • , GRANT V. GRANT. This was a suit for divorce on the ground of adultery, `prroted by 31ajor Charles Grant, against Mary Asn, his wde. The libel had hecn ad.nOteds, iuld*,cluestim now raised was as ie;the sufficiency of the,an.swerag,Alehnehand toatallegati7_,o ftacnM faculties of!, the . psr* \ After Dr. JeNza and Dr. ADDAS bad n heard for the wife, and Dr. . DoosoN end Dr. 11Aoaatto for the bus band,Dr. Lirs/ittiovori gave Sentence: Ma* Grait had ad mitted; that whilst at St. Vincent` b e ' remitted 6001 per annum to his wife. This adinission was sufficient to enable the Court to ground upon it an allotment o f iliniOny when the question came regularly , befori it, for it could not be assumed that Major Grant had been guilty of :devaitition of the estate, by paying that sum out of what was due to the creditors. . The Coußt subsequentlir diiected that 41 per' week d sh ec o i u d l e d d b : e o" t , the wife till the q . oestio, of slisio7 was RICSARDSON V. ILICHAUDSOit. This Was a suit for iliVoree bk reason' of 'adulterYf pro muted hy,Dr. G erar d Richardson, of Demerara, against Sarah Hglirietta, Isis wife., Dr. tura/toms, after recapitulating the -facts of the rase; * ll6 O Pronounce fay the-separation as prayed. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, FIB' 20. • CUMMINS V. MILYLER AND A IM/WM. The plaintiff in this case is the Rev. Patriet Matthias Cumming, and the defendants ' Mr. Meylsr and Mr. Mul ligan, are the Propri e tor an d, Editor of the Bath Herald. The declaration stated, that the defendants had printed and published three libels of and concerning the plaintiff. With respect to the two first the defendants had pleaded Not Guilty, and upon that plea issue was joined. T41 . 6e third libel a plea of j us tific a ti o n wag put in. • The Jury returned a verdict for the: plaintiff on the eight first counts, with one farthing damages ; and found for the defendant on all the other counts; thereby declaring, that in their opinion the justification had been proved. Mr. PARKE asked his Lordship to certify, for the put pow of depriving the plaintiff,of his costa. The Loan CHIEF• BARON said, he would take time to consider. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. THE ROYAL HUNT. His Majesty's Stag Hounds met on Monday at King's Beech Hill, but had only a short run, the ground being so extremely heavy that the horses could not keep up with the hounds, who ran into and killed the deer near Wink field Church. STAG HUNT. On Tuesday last . the Hon. Grantley Berkeley's Stag Hounds met at Dawley Wall, where a fine baldfaced stag was found for the day's diversion. After running with great speed for an hour and a half, on the Hounds coming up with him he attempted to clear an iron fence at Hamp ton, when one of the spikes entering his heart, the fine animal fell a victim to his staunch pursuers. Among those who were close up at the time and had to regret the death of the noble game, were the Earl of Belfint, Lords Kinnaird and E. Chichester, and the Messrs. Berkeley. LINLITHGOWSHIRE YEOMANRY CAVALRY. —The first troop of the Royal Linlithgowshire Yeomanry Cavalry, met at Winchburgh, on the sth current, and gave a farewell dinner to their much valued Captain, ALEXAN DER DUNCAN, EST Caledonian Mercury • SHIP LAUNCH AT FLINT.—O►► T!►ursday last, the 7th inst. a handsome schooner, called the Flint Castle, was launched at Flint, being, we believe, the first vessel ever launched there. Ilcr length on the deck is 65 ft. in., breadth 17 ft. 2 in. and burthen per register nearly 85 tons. She is a beautiful specimen of naval ar chitecture, and does great credit to the enterprising and tuuch-respected owner, T. EYTON, Esq. Pen y Palmant. —Chester Courant. LOSS or TIIE CLYDE, SLOOP.—A sloop called the Clyde, Jomisrow, master, 78 tons burthen, laden with flour and wheat, and bound from Cork to Glasgow, was wrecked on Sunday night, on that part of the coast off Tramore, where the Aurora ?) lately perished. The crew were all saved. Of her cargo, about 200 bags of flour and wheat, in a damaged: state, were saved. The hull and some Materials were sold yesterday, for the benefit of the underwriters—the sloop and cargo having been insured.— Tipperary Free Press. The schooner Fancy, ItiTcHIE, of and for Dundee, from Newcastle with coals, in taking the river Tay on the night of Saturday last, with a strong south easterly wind, was enveloped in a thick drift of snow, Which totally obscured the lights at the entrance. The vessel was then anchored i❑ four fathoms water, but the gale continuing with great violence, she drifted on the sand called the Elbow End, where the situation of the crew became perilous in the extreme. Two of them were washed overboard and drowned, while the three remaining, namely, the master, a seaman, and a Danish boy, clung to the rigging, where they remained for nearly twelve hours of that dark and tempes tuous night. On Sunday morning, their situation was de scried by some Broughty Ferry fishermen, who fearlessly put off and rescued the hapless seamen from their awful si tuation, bringing them ashore, to appearance more dead than alive.—Aberdeen Chronicle. SHERIFF'S FUND.—Yesterday a public meet ing of the friends and supporters of this Fund (instituted twenty years since, for the purpose of reclaiming criminals more especially juvenile ones) took place at the London Coffee House, Ludgate-hill, Mr. Sheriff Sperrnswoorm in the Chair. During,the meeting letters of apology for their absence were read from the Marquis of LANsnowNE and Mr. PEEL, but enclosing each the sum of 20 guineas.. Mr. HUNT also announced himself as an annual subscriber, and proposed a vote of thanks to Mrs. F& and the Society of Females, which much astonished that worthy lady, who asked hint if he was in earnest. The subscriptions of the day amounted to 3601., after which thanks were voted to the Chairman, and the meeting dispersed.- A new line of road, avoiding the steep hill at Culverhouse, has been opened between this city and More. tonhatnpstead. A new-line of road is also talked of from Moretonhampstead to Tavistock, and from thence to Cal lington ; by which the present bills will be in great Inca. sure avoided..--Exiter Alfred. We lately inserted a letter from a gentleman in Largs, pointing out a mode of making artificial sheets of ice for curling and skating, and we now learn that on Wed., nesday last a party of curlers played four games on a fine field of ice, which had not a drop of water on it till the morning of the preceding day.— Glasgow herald. into our p r os y ses a s d i o tZ b etleiet:-w.oafte-rPalaerkr lotafsw.rehiecheoistivy4rostei gelar : instead of the mud impress.of the royal arms this sheet bears the impression of a cap and to what is stated to have been Worn by jesters. Nom-711U size of the paper, we imagine the mark to have been atypti of its name; " Fool's cap." It might be questioned whether any modern paper, will last so many - yews. Boston Gazette. A countryman passing along the high road near the Bridge of Waterford on Thursday, had, his knee shattered by a musket-ball.. It has not been discovered whether this occurrence was by accident ordesign, neither is it known from what quarter the shot was fired.•:.2'ip perary Free Press. • • - On Thursday a man was killed in Ballybricken by the falling of a chimney, which he had foolishly wagered that he would knock down with one blow of a stone. He. aimed too truly, and being directly under the chimney,, paid the forfeit of his life for his temerity.—Tipperary Fre Press. A few days ago a mechanic, at Witavra,-iiiite Middlewich, being ill, and unable to attend his work as usual, his wife reproached hint bitterly, and in the course of the altercation that ensued, worked herself into a furious passion, venting the tuost horrible and blasphemous imprecations on the poor roan. Among the rest, she wished " he might be plungedinto the lowestpit of h—lt." and said she "'would not mind:going half way to take him there !" In the midst of this demoniacal phrensy, she suddenly lost the use of her sight and PPeech, becam e almost completely paralysed, and died iu a few hours after wards.— Chester Courant. ANOTHER' BANK ROBBERY.—«'e have just heard of a robbery which was perpetrated on Sunday last, on the bank of Messrs. WATERS and Co., Swansea. The particulars of this affair have not yet publicly tran spired ; but the amount stolen is said to be 20,0001., of which 10,0001. is in specie. The depredators were traced to Bristol by some gentlemen connected with the hank.— Yesterday afternoon the gentlemen arrived in this city, but failing in their endeavours to find the thieves, they set off to London by the evening coach. In the evening some police officers from Bristol arrived here ; and having learnt that a post-chaise and four had been ordered out from a respectable inn in this city by four persons, and that it had taken the road to Tetbury, the officers imme diately went in pursuit. —Bath Gazette. The LORD MAYOR of 1825, who, by the side of the late Duke of YORK, laid the first stone of the New London Bridge, has presented Miss PORTER with a splendid copy of " The Chronicles of London Bridge," in compliment of her notice of London Antiquities in her story of " The Field of the Forty Footsteps."—Bath Chronicle. SUPPOSED MURDER.—During the whole of yesterday, the Police Criminal Officers were on the alert, but without success, in order to apprehend NEIL AaNarr, journeyman wright, who resides in the Drygatc, and who, it is reported, murdered his wife on Monday morning. ARNO'TT and his wife were both addicted to the excessive use of ardent spirits, and the general opinion is, that while in that state he committed the deed which we are about to state. Between the hours of three and five o'clock on Monday morning the neighbours were alarmed with the cries of " don't murder me—don't murder Inc," apparently accompanied with heavy blows. Nothing further tran spired till the morning, when one of their children, a boy about four years old, came to one of the neighbours ? about eight o'clock, and requested her to put on thi fire, as her mother was unwell, and his father had gone' o prison. This neighbour instantly went, and on examining the bed found Mrs. Aastorr quite cold and apparently dead for some hours - . The alarm was instantly given, and the children of Auxoxr, a boy and girl; the former four and the latter two years of ag e , were interro ated, when the brit stated . that his fath er wen t out at ,i x o'clock and was going to prison. Th e se 'are ,the g only authentic particulars of this horrid affair, yet trams pired. The body *as, during the' day, pot into a coffin and conveyed to the police-office for a judicial examination, lwhich is to take place • this day. Aussorr sinnetitne, ago acted as a substitute to the Police, bat latterly lie,fPllowed his trade which was a Wright. When therolje&OlCeft were searching the honse th e y found a, jug in the biftsi4e4 the Ideceased lay, with . about a fialf-ifiutehkin of iiiskey - Asnort Cannot-escape' long, es he was .seen in the town Tuterdaf.4—,Glaspoecaurier.. a ' • BRITISH EXPORTS Statement of the Quantities of the under-mentioned Arti cles of British Manufacture Exported from Liverpoel, from the 9th to the 16th inst. inclusive. Cotton 147,921 Pieces. 331,116 Yards. Linen 537 ... 287,716 1... , Blanketing - ... 11,460 ... Carpeting - ... 22,007. ... Calicoes - ... 25,954- ... Flannel - ... 9,993. ... Woollen Stuffs 1,854 ... 195 ;ads. Kerecymeres - ... 272 , ... Worsted Stuffs 12,211 ... 40 ... Baize Inferior Woollens 4,524 ... 429 ... Cotton Yarn _ Sail Cloth - Cotton Hose Silk Hose Cotton Handkerchiefs Cotton Braces Worsted Caps .. Hats 459 ... . Haberdashery 5,676 Yards. Earthenware £7,261 Hardware _ £26,933 Salt, White Salt, Hock Slates.. Coals.. Iron 0 Tons, 0 Cwt. 0 Chif_ - 308 Ton., 440 Cwt. THE MARKETS. COAL MAR ] Adair's ---------. 355. Od. Beaumont ---:—. 32 6 Bittrdon ----- .33 9 Heaton 36 6 Hebburn Main ---. 35 6 33 6 Killingworth 35 9 _Ord's Redhugh 0 Polito!, Wind50r.,,.,..,,,,., 31 6 Tanticld . ..~•~•••••«.....r.we 32 0 • Walla lindHetton--..., 39 0 Ditto Stovart's 3 9' Ditto Henderson.„ 30 t Ulyth ....... 27 0. Hartley 33 .0 Llangentteth 4I 0 Ships at market, 56—Shj KEE—Feb. 20. WallsEndßewicke&Co. 375.6 d Ditto Brown'o... —35 9 Ditto Clarke and C 0... 33 n Ditto Cramlington— 31 0 Ditto Hilda 3t 3 Ditto Hotspur 31 is Ditto Northumberlan4 34 6 Ditto Pealed! 33 9 Ditto Perkins and Co. 35 6 Ditto liiddelPs 36 6 Dittd Itussell 36 0 Bden eimish South Moor 32 0 EMain 33 S 34 Stone 33 0 sold, 25 —.41.n501d, 3L COUNTRY CORN MARKETS DUB :ING TU WEEK, Wheat. f Barley. Vats. Per Quarter. 8. to s. 35 42 30 34 ZW 39 £7 30 36 3S :36 45 43 16 54) 3S 42 26 30 3U 40 a; 34 23 :3 - 2 37 44) 36 40 40 42 30 3-t 3 1 3 45 28 34 30 34 Binningham* --- Bridport Cirencester Cr uildtbrd llerefiird ---- Maidenhead - Newbury,.,...... OaLingbani Treading Southampton - Stroud Tewlrebury -- Uxbridge Wantagc Warminster .—... Worcester.—..... CHELTENHAM. Per Bushel. s. d. to s. d Wheat 6 0 7 0 Beef Barley - 3 6 4 0 Mutton Oats Beaus 5 6 7 0 Pease 3 0 8 0 Pork ~., Hay 4l. 55.46 51. IIA RKE' to., s. 35 42 ;30 ; , 36 24 . 40 26 28 21 26 24 31 26 37 26 34 42 28 38 1 r 35 26 36 20 35 21 26 30 32 32 42 33 38 2S 32 30 40 22 26 22 30 22 M 19. rlb. ss. per ton. S. .7. 6'o 56 46 tiU •-• 62 fin - f 9 - liii d. to d. 6 8 (si i 7 8 0 0 - 6 S LEWES MARKEV.—Feb. 19. White Wheat (per quarter) £2 16 oto .£3 0 0 Red ditto 2 10 0 2 14 0 Barley Oats, New ..:. Year..c ,,, , ' 2 0 0 2 4. 0 Oil cake, New ' 43 10 0 per thottannid. • SCOTCH DIARKETS. DUMFRIES MARKETS.—Feb. 13. . . s.d. s.d. ' ' ' ti. d. b.d Wheat, Imp. Bush 6.0t0 6.6 Butter, 16oz. 0 2 0 9 •• Barley 0 0 3 4 Eggs, dozen.... 0 0 0 7 Oats - '• ' 0 2 6 Beef, per lb.' O2 • 7.6 Flour, 141 b. Oatmeal 1 9 1 10 Yeat . ~. .... • .. ...... 0 4 06- Potatoes,. cal. - .. _ , . .. GLASGOW CATTLE f►tARKET.—Febb.lB. There were 400 Black Cattle' in this day's latriet, ,the greater part of which were sold off at' from 71t. , to 9s. 6d. per stone. Sheep 37 score—While-faced ' , . : Sheep .28s. to 32s.—Black-faced \Welders 21s. 235.....;..E5res 148. to 18s. 4 AIEETINGS OF CRE.OITORS. • ,- LONDON DI 4,ltY..—Fot nay. Thlile,Court ,or Barlow and Co. Nom' , rlisakt. ners'.... ....... „ ... . tt Barnard. S., Ki'egatomam..Hull, awn:haat • 1 .1 1 Cope, H., Barnet, ta il or Dean, FL Commercial-road, 'Lambeth /1 Ms. R., Brighto n,. ... . ... . . ..... Gray, J. B erwia - atreet.'corn-dealer . lO Guyatt, G., Dulwich, butcher...... ... .... ..... ;. . . 11 Hail, S., Mile.end, .. . .. - CO U NTRY DI A itY:—.4iiinttimr, FEL Biddle, J. and C 0... Cardig,Crunrcrercid realni,,Brotell . Drewett, N„ Ernswooh—Crown, Jones, E., Liverpool— , Clarentloni , TreeP. Bayley, 'G., Bermondsey,' taller and draper : :.:• .:i ~,, • j., .. •-• Burge, Thomas, Frome„faimer , .-..-..: - . ~ .... Carlisle, John, 7 Newingtort,Araveller Colville, John; Old Keitt-road.'h l 4 l der , _ •,. . . . Franklin, Robert, Parkaaric, caeca, ster L INSOLVENTS Petitions ) , i b u rnT,h jot oor hnb:eo;nho,e,F A rde P b.a P t2 L sp, Y oaz i ttii N isfai. G ine I It' .n' , traveller , :Ilardacre, S., -s-nfte . conte,.dealer . • • . Mentor, Wut., - Wa brertb.,. farmer Is et treeo 'cloc ela k lAn . 'D .- 484341':1141114Igpida ' ' Millard, John, Somersetange, aer. • , Moses; S. Harrow, gefies_al v -d o e n ! . re,,painter Selway Thomas , • , ~41 1.1 ,° "°"3t ...Y 'h =nc ra nuf„t ' ' ' sinfid c f, --: 2..t.....5tret. _ e -,-., A Tia mgrs h, it:, Wailvortb, so licit or ' s clerk• ' . IXII - f' - ' • ' ' , Pi ropi nk e lia . ra w , i t., . Da llo w tti lis tig h: m r-re ,v , tu l a . lher . .. vi kL. . .. ,• • COUNTRY.;—.At the Court-house, Wakefield , February 2 4 . at Ten o'clock. • • Baines, Wm., Huddersfield, woollen draper •'. Nilson John, Gawthorpc, Huddersfield, clothier .;. Mattftew, Hunslet; ptiblican • Leeds, farmer . , - , .' Radcliffe, Jones, a a ah w i iTi Hob son , es d s h i : j a ,. r f l : w. I , jh'. James, Leeds, e a ht . rn . in n oare , r e l Dec; e w sh i mas L s g tieK ' a v h kr° e: es tl n l: ar ig : t dge r_ 4 ' : eiv u : ti,rd: r c c gli rt 're w ' rna P t i l fr- heh l : ni ' mei 2 ui c c a f t : i u rco i ctil a ti tit b ureal ct ne e r t tr, tl 4 ,e.,r‘ -. 1. ::,. . : ' 1, ' ,,. .. ,,, - ;.i.. it ,!,, HarrahY, Charles, Halifax, card-maker . . ... • • - . ,• Brcar, Jmatephs„,:tsitattar7l:l,,riawsretooce,rs.teFdrcbto.:::m,, at Ten. , . A: . .. • .. ' ce Garth, tv vir oaai ir ti t d iknki eel y i rr, , n, ' soTni : John, o. 11no ah l 3 ns r , a , : Ki r o no r r d ai re , ye a c: P bo bo u rA bi to ro ed iC u u:g s: : : . f.a :i vni • a ag teau g r on r, : i ;: e ' r '''' , 47 ''.l--1 . %, George, Loßhouse-gate, innkeeper. .Senior, R., Kirkburton, labprer . ' • Schofield, James, Wakefield, innkeeper Pilling, John, Bradford,- innkeeper- , .Farrar, John, Bolton. msrd-mak_er Sutton, Robert, Newton, blitel4cr•• Dutton, Wilfiam,'Leeds, joiner a n d carpenter Driver, John, Wake fi eld, maltster Luptonll , John - Arniley, Leeds, cloth-maker 1 .. . 131,RZUS. • - ---- -.-- -- - 7 .- -7— : -- --: 777. On the 19th inst., .at Old Windsor, the Hon. Mre. Neville Reid, of a daughter. at Harpenden, Herts, bir5...,801. . .. . : ; Le Oa tke 20th inst., Airs. John King, of Claphani-rise, Of a daughter. . . On the 20th inst. • Al a treei Chelsea; ` the lady o f , in nor-o , - Leonardo e of l a 7t s li on i . nst., Mr.. G. AL Braithwaite, chief officer of the HOneurable 'Cotnpany's ship GerieraltHairis_,_of a son... - . : ' ' On the 20 t h i nst.; the linly4Blr.• 4.. S; Wiii, if Lie. 'cola'f-inn, and'of Bidtioriogli4tted" 13tItt°71- ocesolot, of -a eon: : v V .,, : 7 - .:•:' On the 15th inst.roCClieck inden ' °z i°rdeilirest the lady of the Rev. Joseph Fenthtf' lla. 'On the 17th inst. at R ilf .111rs. f paniel Tigl±ef of A L : 11 ~. On the 17tki,rist!VP lady Of Jatnea 5.,11,!i-...,1'e r ,,' I ' orithi46lo-2.triLa, a eon. county Wi c id ow ,„ Ireland, ?ter. • 7 1 'II n'l Mpoie-street t , , the of a danflitiri. ; tielena Rt*nmio, 4;?tk. t Niw-Churdi• On the loth+ a ' • CikeheuMr. ~t reet , to IV ISS Orel].•• • Of St. James • .4ert of ~4he sea. On the 19th hut., at ireneetter, bi,;the c Rutherfolld, of • 4 • Good !oe i k o: , itiima , third danghpet of John %Zip': of 19th inst., at St: Martin's in the riga "ale md t gan i Mr. Roltert ‘ tyn e , o f D UO Platt, of Burbage. , ' . „,,, /0 , • 1 , v.','!;7;•• the 83d year of her age - . Ou the 19th inst., Mrs. Roelifort, of jerrnya.street, in On the 20th in B t., James, eld est son of Dir. Jame* On the 17th inst. , at his resi3 years. dence, Mangleld Wood. house, Nottinghamshire, Edward W oodcock,. Esq., in Ate Barnard, of 84th year of his age. On the ]sth inst. Clapham-road. aged 46, -William Ellll-1 of the Old Bailey, aged .IMMIIM 4Iq p,,. lag= ViiiiiTsb and Pubusp r ED b y S At, „i IM 9 73 res IttOg: =ox i)04‘3.• c‘ v.)— - 9 .21 o; mem , : rt,sdfassi v:11 tk;: 4 (/ • Jolla I Thi to the Life. Ms Way of; Persor as ate deride ebtalai All and th 4 34herei which COO ti which the SUE Within ni the i Adv 4 Earl SF Callas ‘lr. J. Air. B. Sir W. Ad VI Day an. Sir T. H. Tea Capt. I Mr. J. Mr. W. Dr( Fry' Mr. Jai Mr. Wi Mr. WI Mr. J. Mr. Wi A dv Green,' Di Mr. Da. Air 9. Ni Adve Mr. C. Sir W Mr. H. Sir J. Advertit The ioti bens c Assist Worst of "Hs Bouja Esq.. 11r. G. fir. J. J. Pil • , Martz Advi !toloael ,4_,cr, C 4 P' pLA( Willie The Diu Henry Willia ter, Advi Walbx