The Sun. — London, England, 1841-04-22 00:00:00

SPIRIT of the PUBLIC JOURNALS. !mom THE DAILY Jousts:AEA ovv.'TEsTERDAT. CHRONICLE.--The Times throughout 1833, and down to the autumn of 1934, was the advocate Of popular municipal institutions ; but, having changed sides, that consistent journal now defends every rotten establishment, and justifies every Tory who profits by "things as they are." The Bill of the Attorney-General, "to facilitate the administration of Criminal Justice in certain boroughs in England," serves as a text for an article in the Times of yesterday (which tells us that "its attention has been directed to some recent proceedings, both in and out of Parliament"), in which it is hardly possible to crowd in the same space an equal number of misrepresenta tions. We hardly need to direct the public attention to the contest which has long subsisted in the unincorpo rated English boroughs for obtaining popular local govern ment as a substitute for courts leet and baron, and local ma gistrates, in the place of nominees of the county lieuten ancy. The eager desire for self-government was of course greatly stimulated by the reform, in 1835, of the old cor porations of the ancient boroughs: On the Municipal Bill of that year, in which authority was given to the Crown to incorporate the new communities not enjoying charters, becoming the law of the land, the populous towns of Manchester, Birmingham, Devonport, and Bolton. im mediately petitioned the Privy Council for charters. Such instruments of local government gave those ill-governed towns the benefit of popular Magistrates; Courts of Quarter Sessions, with quick periodical trial of criminals; an efficient police for the security of life and property ; separate Coroners, and all the advantages of self_govern ment enjoyed even in Prussia and other continental countries, to the great benefit of the people. The ac cession of power to the Liberal party in the above boroughs, consequent on the grant of charters, and the loss of income by the Tories who worked most advantageously for themselves the old superseded system, gave rise, as a matter of course, to the most viru lent Tory opposition. The charters were contested in the courts of law, and every possible opposition was given to their proper working. After three years of torturing litigation, a majority of the Judges, as we recently reported, decided in favour of the validity of the Manchester charter. An appeal is now pending in the House of Lords which may delay the final decision of the question for a year or eighteen months. In the mean while, the administration of jus'ice is grievously disturbed by these vexatious and interminable proceedings. The grants of Quarter Sessions are also disputed, on the legal point of their being avoided for want of local gaols. The natural consequence has been, enormous expenses of law, uncertainty of jurisdiction, collisions between the two classes of the Magistracy, borough and county, throwing all rates into arrear and abeyance, while the contracts between the counties and boroughs in respect of custody of criminals are the subject of li!igation in Westminster Hall, the Ministers of Justice are unpaid, and a spirit of party most injurious to the towns, has been engendered, and is daily on the in crease. We had hoped that the recent decision of the Judges would have terminated this deplorable and destruc tive State of matters; but the Times. in the name of the " Conservatives," abets its continuance in a gross attack on the Attorney- General as " Jach Rapid," and the ob ject of his Criminal Justice Bill is craftily passed over. The Bill does not confirm the Ch irters, but simply enables the new borough; to build gaols, or certract with the county Magistrates for custody of orisoners in county eaols. Since the second reading of theßill, the active opponents of the Charter in Manchester, aware of the results which must follow the recent decision, and following the example set by the ex-town-clerks in 1835, who compromised the Municipal Reform Act fur compensations, have expressed their willing ness to settle the entire question by supportirg the At torney-General's Bill, on the condition of the insertion Of clauses for compensatien to themselves for alleged loss of fees of office. Such additional clauses are noticed as " amendments," to be introduced by Mr. Wilson Patten, for Manchester, and by Sir Charles Douglas and others fur Birmingham; and for this purchase money it appears that the few losers by the incorporation of Manchester and Birmingham would acquiesce in the Attorney-General's Bill, confirm the charters, and abandon all further litiga tion I But the Tories of the Borough of Bolton step in and refuse the accommodation, declaring that they will for no price consent to the incorporation of Bolton. The Times, on their authority, would have it believed that the sop of compensations and payment of costs of all parties is the pureert of the Bill, and that this is an object aimed at by the Liberals. Such i 3 not the fact. The Bill, so far as it has passed through Committee, contains not a word on the subjsct ; and the Reformers in all the towns have raised, and will raise, sufficient funds by voluntary subscriptions to fight their opponents. Moreover, we see by the Liberal provincial pi ess a determination to resist compensations. The Manchester Guardian of Saturday contains a report of a meeting of the Town Council Gf that borough, at which a resolution was unanimously passed against the cen ceesion. The Birmingham Journal, recording the same general feeling in Birmingham, says :--ti We are t di-posed to co quite so far; we are not unwilling to build a golden bridge for a fl)ing enemy ; but we must first see his back." Such are the real facts respecting the Bill of the Attorney-General, aid the reprmentations of the Times are utterly unfounded. We shall en a future occasion stme the circumstances re lating to the charter of Bolton, which are equally misre presented. In the meanwhile, we will only observe that it is a disgrace to the Legislature of the country that such a state of local government as we have described should be suffeied to exist. We cannot, however, believe that Par liament will sanction the nails of its long , r continuance. The legal question of the charters is virtually settled in favour of their validity. Are the " forty pieces of silver" charged for the Municipal Reform Ac• again to he de manded and exacted in the Lords? Will Sir Robert Peel, who distinctly approved of the Municipal Bill of 1835, step in and put an end to this scandalous contest ? TIME S.—We doubt the wisdom of the " hushing•up " pt in. We believe that those who, through fear of dis couraging, friends and encouraging foes—of " revealing the nakedness of the land "—and on like pleas suppress the voice of genuine and honest dissatisfaction, are the worst hinderers of the cause they wish to promote. In narrating the following anecdote we shall distinctly sepa rate ourselves from this class. A few days since, a gen tleman of notorious and uncompromising principle, resi dent in one of the great metropolitan districts, was applied to, in due course, for his subscription to the Conservative Association of which he was a member. His answer was a firm and prompt denial—" I shall subscribe no long-r," The agent of the Association respectfully requAted to be permit ed to report his reasons for withdrawal. " My reasons are, that you have done, and are doing, no good." An explanation was offered. The clearest proofs were tendered of the efficiency of the Association. A eon tinual progress had been made in diminishing the Radical strength, and in augmenting the Conservative forces ; and it was clear, to all human modes of calculation, that the very next election must entirely establish the Conservative ascendancy in that locality. " I grant all this," was the reply. " I admit that you have worked perseveringly and well ; and that you have purged the register ; and that it is-very probable that the next opportunity will entirely change the representation of this district. But, when all this is done, I still ask what good you will have done? You gain a Conservative majority in Parlia ment—you turn out the Ministry. That is, you net rid of one set of scoundrels, and have another set in their room ?" We aver, that this corn ersation took place very recently; and that the malcontent was a highly respectable, wortby, and well-principled man, resident in this metropolis. Now, we are not going to defend his mode of reason. ing. To him, personalty, and to the very many persons who may feel half-dispose] to agree with him, we should say—" Do not disfranchise yourselves, do not commit po litical suicide, merely because you do not approve the course taken by certain political leaders at a given mo ment of time. You have clear and strong opinions of your own, Stand prepared to assert them. Claim and maintain your own franchise. Who knows how soon the opportunity may arrive, which may call forth all your allyour nts, what but ruin can at ise f rom a w ilf u l and deliberate cession of all political p ower ; to t h ose the into whose bands Government itself must fall, should your example be gener a lly f o ll owe d ? " But, while we thus entirely admit t h e i rrat i onal charac ter of this sort of despairs band, whether the Conserva w t o i e v t e m seriously ask, on t h e ot h er band, ought not to h e made aware of, and ought n y to lay t o h eart , the appearance and growth o f t h is sort.i feeling. The persons among whom it is spreading are firm aner te CYO 11_, Conservatives; they have been warm and zealous Conser vatives also; but disgust and despair are taking c pl of ardent expectation. Is it not desirable to unrielisteand thoroughly to what this serious charg e is owing? The causes are not at all inscrutable. Part of it, the ground work of the whole, may be traced to hope long deferred.. More, much more, to the numberless reprieves, quite unin telligible to folks " out of doors," which the Conservative leaders in Parliament have given, within the last two or three years, to the mi;ersbles on the Treasury benches. But the crowning fault, that which turns wonder into wrath and dissatiefaction into disgust--is. un questionably, the tolerance, and more than tolerance, shown by the Conservatives in Parliament to the new Poor-law. We are well aware that this frank revelation of that state of things which mere party politicians would counsel us to keep out of sight, will be eagerly snatched at by the Downing -street journalists, who well kn ow that their masters have lived for these three veers past, and are now living, not upon their own strength, upon their own merits, but upon the weaknesses, the "libe ra l concess i ons, " and the want of merits on the part of their opponents. Let them pounce upon the admission, as they doubtless will; and l e t t h em take With it the declaration ' which they ' cannot gainsay, t h at the moment a Conservative party in Parliament, whether consisting of the pr esent or any ot h er, shall heartily and s i nc erel?,,- esPi"t throw . itself upon the people, making the faith and its rule, that instant the swarm of of Christianity urchan things which now professes to call itself a Government vanishes bats and birds cf night b e f ore the away, l ike 3inguThe fact, however. with w tee beg an this asi N l s n. is a s e e s r i t o a u t one, and rill rin grave cor isideratior. What must o o f t hi ngs b e, w h en t h e C onservative; turn in disgust from ' their own leaders in one place, and whoa Conservatives and Chartists rre found in amicalle ceineact in another? Let no man be so f o olish as to call this '•a deserti on r f principle." It is the contrary—it is the highest tribute to principle. The man who breaks up all party time like the individual we have just deecrih , d, in the metrepelis, or the Chartists who support Mr. Welter in Nettinglinno does so in the fervency of a zeal far precple., compared with which such trill -s as Whiggism and Toryism arc mere childish dreams. The tie which binA man to his brothe r man, is older tban the annals of Eegland can reach, and will endure wh en t h e names of Peel and Russell sha'l be alike forgotten. STANDARD.—Mr. Hume, not very frequently the protector of the interests of religion, complained of a corporal punishment lately intlcted upon a soldier of the 11th Hussars Di vine Servoiree the on at Hounslo w , i mme di ate l y after Di obSunday. M r . M acau l ay defended the conduct Noble Colonel of the I I th Hussars, Lord Cardigan, as far as im cruelty b could form an i ngre di ent i n the charge against him, ystating, as th e resu l t of mi. ieqUitiest that the punishensat referred to was the first of the liind inflicted in the regiment for some years ; and the ch arse of irreverence he tried to palliate, b y expl titling that the punishment was not inflicted immediately arter Divine Service, but after the interval of a gong inspection succeeding the public worship. He, however, gave a promise that means shall be adopted to render impossible hereafter a similar profanation of the Sabbath. To defend Lord Cardigan from the accusation of cruelty was perhaps unnecessary ; we believe that there is no officer in her Majesty's service more distinguished for kindness to the private soldier under his command, or one more ardently beloved in turn by the soldiers of that rank. And even the charge of irreverence is in some degree mitigated by what appears to have been hitherto more generally than it ought to be the practice of the army. The very fact that the proper public duties of the Sabbath bad been imme diately followed up by what, though without any exe cution, must seriously obstruct its private duties and innocent relaxations, is a confession that some reform of our military system is called for. Why should a Sunday be chosen as the time for a long inspection ? Why leave for the S tbbath a service which might surely be as well executed upon any other day ? Under particular circumstances it may be necessary for a regiment to prosecute its march upon a Sunday ; and war leaves no choice as to the time when an enemy is to be encountered : but in all such cases the necessity is manifest, and justifies the departure from what otherwise is a duty binding upon all Christian. If, however, we are to have a Christian army—and woe awaits us when we shall have any other—the same rule of Christian conduct must be observed by soldiers as by citizens. The case before us indeed seems to point to the dangerous consequences of deviating from this rule in even a slight degree ; the assembling of the men for inspection was probably, according to military usage, chosen as a fitting occasion to inflict a just pun ishment, without consideration of the offence that such an exhibition must offer to the religious feelings of the public, and the shock that it must give to the religious sense of the soldiers. COURIER.—One of our Morning Ministerial Con temporaries, some days ago, noticed a report, commu nicated by a correspondent. from Edinburgh, that Lord Belhaven was not again to be appointed her Maje-tv's High Commissioner to the General Assembly. This report the Whig Evening Paper of the next day stated, by authority, to be incorrect ; and here the matter rests. We had heard the rumour some time before it was noticed by the Morning Paper, and, though inclined to believe it, we abstained from giving it to our readers, contenting ourselves with expressing our belief that whoever may be Commissioner, instructions will he given to him not to countenance the punishment of any of her Majesty's subjects for the offence of obeying the law of the land. In this belief we are more and more confirmed from all we have heard from. Scotland, where, of course, the matter is attracting great interest. No doubt appears to be entertained that, in some way or other, her Majesty's representative will communicate the Royal mind on the unfortunate colli sion that has taken place between the Civil and Ecel'- siastical Courts in Scotland ; and, lookine to the pre cedents applicable to the case, we should think this communication will be made in her Majesty's letter to the Assembly, or in the Speech from the Throne by the Commissioner, and that it will amount to an advice or a command not to inflict further ecclesiastical censures on the clergymen who have obeyed the decrees of the Civil Courts, but to restore them to the exercise of all the judicial and pastoral functions from which the last Assembly suspended them. On the answer given by the Assembly to this communication will depend the course to be pursued by the Crown. If the next Assembly persist in the course pursued by the last, and determine to proceed to the deposition of the Ministers of Strathbogie, the withdrawal of the Royal countenance, and the dissolving of the venerable body may be antici pated ; and the Constitutional party in the Assembly, who have all along vindicated the Strathbogie Ministers. will of course withdraw along with the Commissioner. Whether the majority will after this continue their sit ting, as the Assembly of 163 S did, remains to be seen. We are inclined to think, that with all the noise they have made about their " spiritual independence" the dominant faction will not venture on so bold a step. But it is hazardous to speculate, and we shall wait the issue of events with no little curiosity. GLOBE.—The Times gives d story of " a highly re spectable, worthy, and well-principled man," who refused to continue his subscription to the Canservative Associa tion, because its object was " to turn out the Ministry —to get rid of one set of scoundrels and have another set in their room." Our Contemporary does not justify this feeling, but declares that it is " spreading among warm and zealous Conservatives,with whom disgust and despair are taking the place of ardent expectation." We shall not dispute with these gentlemen on their know ledge of their own party, though, much as we should regret the accession of the Tories to office, it never oc curred to us that Sir Robert Peel would select a Cabi net of " scoundrels ;" nor do we think that the Conser vative leaders deserve the blame which is heaped upon them for allowing the Whigs to remain in office. We are not aware of their having thrown away a chance, or that anything has kept them out except inability to get in, and hopelessness of staying in. The Times says, the Downing-street Journals may make the most of this admission, but that they must " take with it a declamation which they cannot gainsay, that the mo ment a Conservative party in Parliament, whether con sisting of the present or any other, shall heartily and sin. cerely throw itself upon the people, making the faith and spirit of Christianity its rule," there will be a change. We certainly do not apprehend any immediate d inger to the present Government ; but its warmest friends would not desire to subject it to the temptations of that perpetuity of office which would result from their hold ing it till the conversion of the set of scoundrels" to Christianity, or till the Tories throw themselves upon the people. We did not guess the cause of this des pondency till we came to the end of the article, where it appears to spring from the Nottingham election. A statement of progress there is made, in which the Whigs are blamed for swearing in special constables whe❑ " no outbreak of popular violence is expected," though " there are rumours which every body is men tioning in the town, and which may probably lead to their own realization, of tarring and feathering and throwing into the Trent." These are pleasantries to which nobody should object. MONEY MARKET and CITY NEWS. FROM THE MORNING PAPERS OF YESTERDAY. TIMES.—The premium on gold at Paris is 8 per which, at the English Mint price of 31. 17s. 104 d. per ounce for standard gold, gives an exchange of 25 35, and . the exchange at Paris on London at short being J 5 45, it fellows that gold is 0.40 per cent. dearer in London than in Pari,.. By advices from Hamburgh the price of gold is 428 per mark, which, at the English Alir,t price of 31. 17s. 100. per ounce for standard gold, gives an exchange of 13. 6i, and the exchange at Elamburgh on London at short being 13. 7e, it follows that gold is 0.34 per cent. dearer in Lon don than in Hamburgh. The course of exchange at New York on London is 106- per cent., and the par of exchange between Eng. land and America being 109 23-40 per cnt., it follows that the exchange is 2.83 per cent. rgainst England. But the quoted exchange at New York being for bills at 60 days' sight, the interest must be deducted from the above difference. Business in the English Stocks to-day was very limited, and in consequence of the disinclination to deal, the aspect of the market, notwithstanding there was no material alteration in prices, is considered flatter. There was a call for Brighton shares in the errly part of the day, and the discount upon them decreased to li-; but towards the close of business some few sellers appeared, and the last quotation was 2k to ti discount. Other de scriptions were firm. The rate on Hamburgh was much the same as last. post. CHRONICLE.—An abstract of the Bill for the , relief of the Banks, which has passed both houses of the Pennsylvania Legislature, and which was then before the Governor for his signature, is is received by the Baltimore, which vessel touched at Falmouth, from New York, bound to Havre.. Consider able doubts rested upon the question, as to whether or not ' he would sign it, and public o,iinion varied considerably. • Sec. 1. Provide that the B I 'the . r s a'..‘s of Commonwealth • should be liable for the payment of their debts, as are pri vate person 2. Gives the Bank power to issue small notes to the amount of fifteen per cent. on their capital stock, for five year!. 3. Liabilities not to exceed double the amount of ca pital. 4. The stock owned by the Banks not to exceed (except of this Commonwealth) 50 per cent. of the amount of their capital, respectively; pr. wided ti-at no inv estments already made shall be compelled to be r e d uced more rapidly th an 12i.- per cent. every ninety date, 5 No President, or other officer, to loan its funds. 6. No loan to be made to cashiers, &c. 7. Abolishes proxy voting. [The remainder are of lucre detail, with the exception of the last, which is] 17. Authorising the capital of the United States Bank, if the shareholders desire it, to be reduced to fourteen mil lions, and the bank to be released from part of the bonus. The author, whose work on the commerce of Britsh India we quoted yeiterday, observes, that since the East India trade was thrown open, in 1830, there has been a surprising increase in the importations from thence of indigo, jute (coarse hemp), hides, raw silk, flax seed, wheat, flour, ginger, caster oil of the finest quality, and numerous other articles of European consumption. The Bengal indigo has driven the Carolina article out of the market. The hemp from British India competes with that from Russia and Manilla. The imoort of hides to Liverpool from India in 1835 was 367,000, and in 1839 443,000. In 1835 the importation to Liverpool from India of wheat flour for the manufacturing of starch was 4,300, and in 1837 equal to 13,700 bag-. The Govern ment tables show a great increase also in the articles of ginger, saltpetre, and pepper. Yet the p resent consump tion of British manufactures in the East Indies is esti mated at not more than 13 cents a year for each individual in the whole population. Jamaica consumes, says our author, 20 dollars ahead, Tri n id a d 30 dollars, Cape Co lony 30 dollars, Australia 40 dollars. Give justice to India in law and commerce, and at the moderate compute- ' tion of five dollars a-head, she would take five hundred million dollars of British manufactures annually. When I .t is considered that India ha s ma d e such progress sines 1 1830, notwithstanding the unjust system of duties which regulates the admissiun of British goods to Hindustan, and the products of native industry to our ports, we may cal culate on an immense increase under a fair tariff. At pre sent British cotton manufactures pay only 3 1 , per cent, for admission to India, while the rude produ,.e of.that country is taxed at the rate of 10 per cent, in this country. Thu exports of Indian muslius, silks, and cotton goods have in consequence greatly declined, while those of the raw materials have rapidly increased. JOINT-STOCK COMPANIES. TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES. Sir,—Mr. Labouchere having moved tor, and a se lect committee having been appointed by the House of Commons to inquire into the abuses and liw relat ing to Joint-stock Companies, I beg to call your atten tion to the fact, that previous to the year 1824 there were 156 companies projected, all of which have been carried into execution, and are now in existence, and that the profits arising from the undertakings yield, in most instances, a rate of interest greatly exceeding that obtained by any other mode of investment, and may be classed thus : Comp anics. 63 Cnnal..., 7 Docki 25 Insurance 16 Waternorks 4 Bridges 27 Gas 7 R , )ads 7 .I:scell.tneous Capital. X. s. d. 12 202,096 0 0 6,164 590 12 0 20,488 948 0 0 2.973 170 0 0 2.452,017 2 8 1,630,700 0 0 494,964 18 10 1,530.000 0 0 E X47,936,486 13 6 No. cf Shares. 175 374 57 5821 329.841 39,760 31 731 35.194 7,472 17,580 764,5344 But how different the circumstances attending the companies of 1824 and 1825. A majority of them were of a nature adapted only to individual enterprise, as by the formation of a company many useless offices were made and expenses entered into which prevented the possibility of any return to the unfortunate shareholder. The capital required was of such a trivial nature in many instances as to render the formation of a Com pany, a measure only to be attributed to some sini,ter mot,ve of the projector, and tivAt, coupled with the fact that out of 624 companies, requiring capital 372,173,1001., formed in London in the years 1824 and 1825, not twenty of thorn are in exis.trice at the pre sent time, and it would have been well for the parr dupes in those undertakings had they never existed, or that the lives of the mad-brain schemes had been of shorter duration. Die bubbles brought forward in those y( ars con• silted of— Compani 9. Capital. 74 Mining.... 29 Gas 20 Insurance 28 Investment 54 Canal Railroad 67 Steam 1I Trading 26 Building 23 Provision 292 Miscellaneous 624 38,370,000 12,077.000 35,820 000 52,' 00 000 44,051.000 8 555 500 10 450,000 13,781 000 8,360 000 148,109,600 £372.173.100 No. of Shares. 537,200 200 940 651,000 686.500 542,210 125,220 85 000 164,900 674,000 2,294,350 5,963,220 Among which will he found Anglo-Coilain, Angla- Mexican, Anglo•Peruv'an, Braz ban, lien, Bolanos, Bolivar, Chilian, Colombian, Chilian and Peruvian, Castello, Famatina, Guanaxuato, General South American, Gold Coast, flaytian, Mexican, Paso Peruvian, Potosi la Pas, Peruvian, Real del Monte, Rio de la Plata, Royal Waldeck, Tlalpuxahua, United Mexican, United Pacific, United Provinces, United Chilian, Vigo Bay, Brazilian Jewel, Alderney Dairy, Tobacco and Snuff, Ale, Metropolitan Fish, Drug, Car pet, General Dying, Egyptian Trading. Anglo-Russian, Bengal Sugar, Borneo Lon Loo, Isthmus of Darien, African, Cornwall and Devon, Manganese, Royal Irish, English Gwenappe, Tywarnhale, and others too nume rous to mention. From the year 1824 up to the present time compa nies have been brought before the public requiring a no. minal capital of nearly 800,000,0001., out of whica not more th in 80,000,000/. have been bona fide !aid out, Which may be roughly s'ated—viz., 60,000,0001. roads, and the other 20.000.0001 in docks, bridges, and canals, leaving about 700,000,000/. for fictitious and gambling speculations. In the greater nember of instances it will be found ;hat the projector %I'm either an at orney or Par- liamentary agent, who by the concoction of a scheme availed himself of the advantage which it afforded by a bill of costs ; or some unprincipled person actuated solely with a view to p..cnniary pro fit, and to obtain which the measures adopteA were in such cases neither justifiable nor honourable ; the deceptive practices resorted to to obtain a price far ex ceeding the real value of the property can only lie ex plained by the guilty participation of the parties in the spoil ; while in other instances, by imposing on the pro prietors of the Company by nominating a false sum as the purchase•money, and by withholding the greater part of the shares, and disposing of them at consider. able premiums, the parties secured to themselves a for tune nt the public expense. These premiums were obtained by an artificial value being created by mleceu vres, and by the aid of irv;ividuals who, for the sake of a commission, lent themselves to the fraud so committed, To acts of a simil ir nature to those referred to, is to be attached not only the loss of property, but the sacrifice of character, which has, in too many instances of late, been the result of the proceedings of joint-stock companies, where, by the connexion of men of title with designing projectors, the innocent have been implicated with the guilty. It is, however, to be hoped that the I, , sson thus tat ght the public will be the mean.; of pre venting a recurrence of these events, and that the proprietor of a base scheme will be shunned and stigma tized, while the patron and promoter of objects condu cive to national wealth and the public good will be held in that high estimation of the public which it is their duty to bestow, and of the possession of which it is his pride to boast. _ _ It may be laid, how is th's to be prevented ? Why, very easily. Compel the Directors of Companies to have a certificate from the Board of Trade certifying as to the respectability of the parties, and the practi cabiiity of the plan, and a list of their names and resi dences registered at the Stamp-office as responsible to the public as well as the shareholders, before they are allowed to bring the scheme forward For publ:c support. You will then hi a , very se! loin of franduleat Cuinpenies. I am, &c., T. G, MORNING EDITION THE SUN, LONDON, TFLURSDAN, APRIL 22. IS4I AN ODDITY. In a town no less signalised for its enterprise than re markable for the number of " eccentricities" who are .e all times to be seen perambulating its streets, 0;„.. - o w - ing curious incident occurred last wa-- well known character, who goes be , " Smash," happening to fall I , the soub r i que t o f an elder brother—whn had fallen , : :er to some m one y due to while serving i n th e B r i,i s h ~ victim on the bl oo d y fi e ld— got hi mself gion, rigged out , ircm top to toe, in a suit that once was new. no doubt, ma d e a h eavy i nroad on his 'Tiathe'ly outlay, finances, but sill a surplus remained suf ficient in amount to puzzle " Smash" how to get it ex pended. The thought at length struck him, that, for one day in his lile,he wont I act the" gentleman ;" and decked as he was in " bran new and sp.in new," he imagined he would cut no mean figure in " gintale society." Musing how this could ne best accomplished, he espied a gentleman dressed in the first style of fashion, and sporting a huge moustache, enter one of the principal hotels. Determining not to be out done, " Smash" brushed in after the gentleman, and ordering the waiter, whom he met in the passage, with the greatest sang froid, to show him a room, he was ushered into the apartment generally allotted for travellers. After art ang ing his hair before the mirror—rather a novel proceed ing on his part—he rang the bell with rather more vehe mence than " Tohy Tosspot," and ordered dinner and a gill of brandy. Having done ample justice to the smok ing viands,he next told the waiter—who was all the while ignorant of the important personage to whom he was so obsequious —to bring a long pipe and some shag tobacco. In a trice the order was fulfill , ql; and just as the water was retiring, he gave directions that the Kilmarnock Journal should be brought him, and a boy got to read it. The waiter smiled, as well he might ; but seeing the gravity of the gentleman, and trusting to be rewarded for his extra trouble, he ran to fulfil his commission. A boy in the st thle.yard, whose face was newly washed at the well. and carefully dried 'olith his bonnet, was soon enlisted by the waiter ; who, after making him aware of the purpose for which he was vranted, gave him sundry instructions in etiquette. He then, with much deference, introduced the reading bay to the Tittlebat Titmouse of a day, who was sit ting toavbelree- covered with both his legs on the grate, literally enveloped moreo c in the smoke which issued from his Cockney pipe. The acute in the in person of t observationhe politeth n thegen gentleman t thelis s face and figureof "Smash ,"and the mutual glances of recognition which succeeded soon potr an end to the mystery. The waiter, hoilin, with piqued that he had shown so much politeness to n age-- -and afraid lest he should beorneii,bniornmon vagrant made by the voracious app, tto s b for l ate b vno t b irei , tened tbaf he would send for the police. " m S ' t: Smash ; " don't be . so quick in your p threats—how much is your bill e" He was soon tdd the amount. darting hisinto his pocket with ad when Smash, hand the assurance of a person accustomed to the of similar acco unts, pulled out a h an df ul of ,ift,‘,;.„ counted down the amount required w i t h the great ' if greatest glee. Then modestly holding out a shilling to the waiter—which was not accepted—he took his depar ture, highly gratified with what had occurrild.-4,jr Observer. DIVISION OF PROPERTY.—At a meeting held a short time since at Carcassonne, as a letter fron 2 that place states, the persons present amused themselve s by drawing lots for portions of the estate of a Marquis in that neighbourhood, in the event, of any future revolution taking place LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, APRIL 21. The Lord Chancellor did not sit to-day. ROLLS COURT, Arm, 21. ELLIS V. MAXWELL. The Court was occupied all day in hearing this cause ; which was part-heard yesterday, and arose out of the con. struction of the will of the Rev. Wm. Maxwell. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, APRIL 2 SMITII V. CLEASEY. This was an application to the Court to dissolve an in ;unction against proceedings in the Court of Bankruptcy. The application was part-heard yet , ,rday. Ir :ippea , :ed ;hat 'h- plaint'ff, Smith, on the lath September, 1840, made an assignment of his property in tru,t t i tee de'' id ant, Clcashy, and others fa. the payment of his delAs, but the defendant aft, rwards discovering that the plaintiff had a friend, who, it was supposed, would advance money to relic'. e him from his difficultic , , instead of acting upon the assignment issued a fiat of bankruptcy against him., An injunction had been obtained to stay pro ceedings under the fi4t, and application was now made to dissolve the injunction. The Vies-CHANCELLOR said, ihn defondant having en tered into an agreement will the plaintiff, by the pssign mert, could not be released from it, because he had sub s• quently discovered some fan wloc a had not bean fraud uleotly or improperly withheld from him. At the same rime the contradictions to the plaint fr's affilavit and alle gations were so s!rong, that he thought the injunction could not be dissolved at ore3 , nt, but must be continued. The qu , stion of costs must also be reserved. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, Apzuz, 21 SMITH V. BODKIN. —A LEGA L MISTAKE. Mr. WnrrEntt RFT moved in this case for a rule to show cause why the verdict for the plaintiff should not be set a>i te, and a new trial had. It was an action upon a warranty of a horse, which was tried before Mr. Justice Matteson. at the Lei cester Assizes, and the Jury found for the plaintiff, damages 22/. 14s. 6d. There were the usual counts for a breach of cantract, and the defendant pleaded non assunzpsit, and to the two other pleas ratification afier the breach ; What the mean ing of these pleas was he (Mr. Whitehurst) really could not tell. There were a number of witnesses briefed to him, and who were in attendance at the trial, to prove that the horse was sound, but that not being pleaded, he could not produce them, so that it was in reality an undefended cause. The plaintiff merely produced the written warranty, and the only question upon N hich the defendant's Counsel could address the Jury was as to the amount of the damages. The Learned Counsel was proceedin g to state what had occurred between the defendant's attorney and the pleader, when he was interrupted by Lord DEN3tAN, who said, I think we ought not to hear anything of what occurred between the a•torney and the pleader. It is clear there must have been a mistake somewh-re. Mr. WniTEnuR , T said there evidently was a mistake to the detriment of the defendant, who, if he ootained a rule for a new trill , would be able to make a good defence to the action. Lord DENMAN—I think there ought to he an end to the litigation. It would he a cruel mercy to the defendant to give him an opportunity at enormous cost to raise this questi'm again. —Rule refused. TOUNE V. STOREY. This was an action for slander tried before Lord Denman at the last Middlesex sittings, when a verdict was had for the plaintiff, damages 75/. The pllintiff was a cocoa and choco late manufacturer, and the words were alleged to have been used by the defendant in a quarter where he was likely to be injured in his business. Sir F. PoLI.OcK now moved for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, arid a new trial had on the ground of the damages being exec sive. .!'he Learned Coun sel proceeded to detail the facts of the case as they appeared at the trial, and contended that there was no ground for saying that the plaintiff had suffered any material injury in his business. Lord DENMAN said the Court would say nothing at preset as to granting the ru!e, but they would throw out a sugge; tion that perhaps the plaintiff might think it advis dole to ac cept a verdict for 251., and the case might be mentioned to them again in three or four days. EGAN V. THE GUARDIANS OF THE POOR, OF THE KENS INGTON UNION. Sir F. POLLOCK moved in this case for a rule to show cause why the verdict the defendants should not be set aside, and a verdict, entered for the plaintiff, for so many days of employment as the Court might think him entitled to. The case was tried before Lord Denman, at the sittings after last term. It was an action brought by a barrister against the de fendants, to recover the balance of his claim against them for having acted as returning officer at the election of Poor-law Guardians for the Kensington Union. The defendants had paid Mr. Evan two hundred guineas, and had paid 50/. into Court, and the question was, whether he was entitled to rec,•ive any sum over that 2601. By the direction of the Poor-law Commissioners the Guardians selected a barrister to act as re turning officer, and the rate of remuneration was fixed at five guineas a day. The plaintiff had been employed for seventy two days and eighteen nights, the pressure of business being so great that lie was cornpeled to deny himself ordinary rest, and work day and night. It was contended, in the first plats, that Mr. Egan, being a barrister acting for fee, was not entitled to recover. but the Lear•ied Judge over-ruled that objection. -.Next it was urged that. Mr. Egan, having been employed at , flue guineas a day, was not enti led to receive any thing for the extra work he performed at night, although it was given in evid , nce that several of the persons who had worked with him day and night had been paid double the rate of remu neration agreed upon. Now he submitted, that an agreement for five guineas a day must be subject to some reasonable limitation, and that a plitty chose to draw upon his resources for the fol!owing month or two, or upon his con stitution for years afterwards, and sat up night after night, he was entitled to some additional remuneration. The defendants, when employing Mr. Egan at five guineas a-day, must be un derstood to have contemplated the usual working hours, but the present could not be considered in any other light than the case of any ordinary workman who, being paid so much a-day, had a right to make a charge and be paid for extra hours. It was urged further that Mr. Egan had been at work from the 13th of March, but the order of the Commissioners not hav ing come into operation till the 18th, he was not entitled to payment for these five days, but he submitted that the wo k having been done by order of the guardians, they could not now refuse payment on such a plea. The COUNT thought the plaintiff was entitled to the rule. COURT OF EXCHEQULR, APRIL 21. STF.IL V. MUNDELL. Mr. DUNDAS moved for a rule nisi to set aside the verdict for the plaintiff in this ease, and for a new trial, on the ground of the improper rejection of a witness by Mr. Baron lio'fe, who tried the cause at the late Assizes held at Liverpool. The action was brought for the balance due for the building of a ship, and extras. By the contract the ship was to be built in such a manner as at the end of twelve years to stand A I at Lloyd's. In order to show that she was not so built the defendant proposed to call the cap tain who had sailed the ship, but he being examined on the voir dire said, although he was not a co-contractor with the defendant, he, while the ship was building, became a part owner of the ship. Upon that admission the Learned Judge rejected him as a witness. The defendant had not offered the captain a release. The COURT thought the Learned Judge had acted rightly and the rule v,as refused. MOLT V. iior.uscs. This was an action to recover the sum of 1,0001. It also was tried before Mr. Baron Rolfe at the Liverpool Assizes, when a verdict was found for the defendant. Mr. KNOWLES now moved for a rule nisi for a new trial. It appeared that the defendant had been in partnership with a person named Booth. The partnership was dissolved on a :Monday, the sum in question was borrowed on the following Friday, in or d er to pay a partnership debt. The money was borrowed by Booth, who was now out of the way, but as he had prover!, that the money had been anUed to the payment of a 0 .',;0t for which the defendant was liable, he contended the Jury had taken a wrong- view of his liability for the 1,0001. Ihe Coutur considered the case was one peculiarly for the onsideration of the Jury, and did not think there were any circumstances in the case to justify them in disturbing the verdict, ADDISON V. SIR lIEDWOP.TII WILLIAMSON. Mr. GRANGER, on th'! part of the iilsintiff, appeared to move fora rule nisi for a new trial in this case. It was an action of trespass and seizing goods by the Sheriff, which was tri 'd before Mr. Baron Wolf 3 at the late Durham Assizes. lie now moved on affihavits, which di:. closed that the bailiff whose conduct was impugned was the officer who summoned the Jury in this case, and that one of the Jurors who actually tried it was one of the hail to the Sheriff for the Bailiff—they further showed that the v*rlict was entirely contrary to the evicience, indeed so much so as to be accounted fur only by some interes.tei party being on the jury. The COURT granted the rule upon payment of coats, BAIL COURT, APRIL 21. THE QUEEN V. THE MIDLAND COUNTIES RAILWAY. Sir F. Poet.ccx moved for a writ of certiorari to bring up the iiirii , ori ins held on the bodies of Thomas Taylor arid John Livesay, who were killed on the Midland Coun ties Rail xay. in order that they might be quashed. The Learned Counsel said ha had several objections to the finding of the Coroner's jur , in both cases, but he would first inf irm his Lordship of the nature of the accident. It occurred during the time of an interase frost, which pre vented one of the trains moving along in consequence of the plugs being so frozen that they could not get a supply of water. Whilst the train in which the deceased were was standing still, another train came up, and a collision took place, by which Taylor and Livesay, who were attending the engine, were thrown off and killed. It was not denied but that the cause of death was purely accidental; no blame was attached to any individual ; but the Jury levied a deodand of 3001. in each case on the engine of the second train. He (Sir F.) had several objections to urge against the validity of the inquisition. In the first place, it was held at Derby before the Coroner for that borough, when it was proved that the deceased met with their deaths within the jurisdiction of the county Coroner; therefore the borough Coroner had no legal jurisdiction to hold an inquest on the bodice His next objection was to the ineirmality in the wording of the inquisition ; it was posi tivel) nonsense, and many other words must be introduced BOTV-STREET. to make it readable, or anything like wive The William Stacey, a van driver in the service of the Me- Jury in both cases found that the same carriage tropolitan Parcels' Delivery driven Comp over v any,w \ as ii b li r a o m ug ß h e t e u r p e: or engine caused th e d ea th o f both the partiC3, and charged w i t h h av i ng w i l f u lly they valued the engine at 300/, and yet they an officer on board of the Marine Society's ship at Dept gave a &edam' of 3001. ;.., each case, arid ford, by which his leg was broken. proceedings were now going for-vard to recover It appeared that Mr. Reece, in company with three the amour', his Lordship g no doubt was aware that fors. other officers and thirre 1. 7 ,. : i..- ,. e glen to the Admiralty, 111( ''rl'i there was great difllenite in knotkitie! *het to de. end werlil crosslngfroin j NrWift ' ehall, when the prisoner rine.: with deodands after they Pad becn recovered ; but by a I up, and Mr. Reece, fearful that the an might run over existed. The le seine of the boys, who Were crossing in a line, seized hold recent stolit e th e y were elielel of Exuhquer, and no Iliac of the reins to stop the horse, having previously put up his hand for th , risotier p to stop, but to which he paid no both the na'en wet' Killed by o n e and the same concussion, attention. Immediately upon Mr. Ile eve's seizing the eait)ed Po il ti l i t tefl nto rt 1 16 C ei n f.p8aidr' contended ri°n P'tor ii't'l Cl that riCli') ou a wt : on`y tits'deodand c ou ld b e l ev i e d. If the accident had Lorse i the prisoner commen ce d w hippi ng the horse, and been mor e extens i ve and apoalline ' , and, instead of two ; also attempte Ito strike Mr. Reece ; the horse rearel up, twenty or thirty individuals had lotit their live:, could It and ktreckinti Win down passed over him. He was imme be supp ose d f or ar! instant that a deodand of 3001. on every di ite l y conveyed to the ttspital at qharing,cr)ss i when case might b. , levied ? Consequently; it weS clear one or it was discovered he had received a compound fracture of , • the other o f , licie inqui;iti on s co uld net stand; il . iii - h. Mr. Ju s tic e ate innt ,i, N ___t be J ury e 1:,1 the va l ue of Tvei.risoner on Otile„ 4 .40(.4 for his defence, said that the engin e t o b e 300 / ., and they gave that sum in both it was Mr. Recce's own fault, as he at uirripted to climb up cases, eons, q uen tiy a levy m ay b e ma d e against the Corn- the shaft of the van that he might have an oppertunity of panv for 600/. Sir F. Poenocx E tl Lord ; and Ifthat ' * Nrir Reece. xac y s'), my certain the extent of the injeries sustained by . . principle is once admived, parties may as accidents might take place in which 20 or 30 persons be utterly ruined, Rave about 14 or in ye irs of age, and strikin , heat, Ile was remanded, in order further to as- Price, a boy may l ose their ii,,, • s uppose, for i ns t ance , a horse were !se ' ' la ontrining I.lllee of vermicelli and six ...nen two parce , c the to cause the death of an individual ) and the Jury levied of Mr. Stringer, of 84, a bottles of pickles, property, . . ... deodand on the animal greater than its value, thenawil,g• received the mi • owner Thanes-street,and the litter w:tn 1 Jatnes Steeuens, were charged, the former with having ita ~.g_r_ca: tneort si amount n : b than t the: value jurym o e f r . the ght give up the animal, and insist upon its being taken ' ti, in discharge of payment. No deodand could be levie o the prisoner Price had been machine •with a view to his ne taus , ' ' the death. A •tle' in his, F.e.i;ice nea , li , twel.e months,. t earn m e rr ,. k s no r w in i g ng tr i d e e h e a d ve ti o , ; t enstilen , notber o bj ect i on to t h e inquisition was t:iat being apprenticed. 7 The prisoner Steevens is a jobbing artery 0.1 ri had. ldr. Justie %xi ee TT IGllTelAtia../t is signed by 14 out of 1,5, ' ' i tunes., 4 -hi the! 1 • P.. been employed by the witness at different ~ , . that a gentleman had ordered six bottles of pickles, which r:e h.d paid for, and wished to be sent home at once. In the warehouse of the witness, when articles are sold, it customary to put the amount on a slip (..f paper, and put it in the t1:1, and the prisoner had done so on the present occasion. The prisoner was sent with the six bottles, and he was a long time away. The other parcels pro duced were the property of the witness, no part of which he had even sold. He had frequently missed articles to a considerable amount, but never suspected the prisoner. Mary Ann Young deposed that she lived in Queen street, Tower-till, and the prisoner Steevens lodged in her house. He had frequently brought parcels for her to take care of, and she remembered him bringing the par. cell produced. About a week after he brought the last mentioned parcels he left her house without any notice, and the day after he left the younger prisoner called and inquired fur him. She told him she did not know where he bad gone, but wished to know, as he had left her house without paying his last week's lodging. The younger prisoner asked how much it was? She told him 35., and he said he would pay the amount for him, as he knew him to be a very re spectable man. The witness sail she should not deliver the parcels to any person but Steevens, and he not calling for them she had retained them till the officer took them into his possession. Susan Tyson, a servant to Mr. Baker, who keeps an eating house, stated that the prisoners were in the habit of coming ti her master's house of an evening to their supper, and on the 13th of April the younger prisoner brought six bottles of pickles and reque,ted her master to allow him to leave them there until the next day, and he consented. The prisoner then went away, but returned shortly after wards and had his supper, and he asked for one of the bottles and a corkscrew, and took part of the contents of the bottle with his supper and gave the rest to the witness. In a few days afterwards the officer called at her master's house and took possession of the remaining bottles. The officer who took the prisoner into custody confirmed the latter part of this evidence, and the prisoners were fully committed for trial. and 12 is n •usicient number. Have you any otar uu jection. Sir Frederick ? Sir F. Peumerc—Yes, my Lord. The inquisition does not state, in a legal form, at what time it was held, or shat year the death was occasioned. It says, "In the fourth year of our Sovereign Lady the Queen," but does not add the name of her Maj"sty " Victoria." He (Sir F. Pollock( truste d h er M a j esty m i ght live when those who now heard him had done with earthly records; but it, in some future ages, reference was made to the docu ment, it would not be possible to tell in what Queen's reign it occurred, which was clearly an informality. The Court of Exchequer held that a document dated the 6th of April, 1841, as it did not contain the words " In the year of Our Lord," was not a legal iastru ment. No doubt but the document intended the year 1841 of the Christian era ; but, as there had been several eras it was held necessary to insert the words "the year of our Lord." Another objection na.:, that the in quisition did not allege that the bodies were found within the jurisdiction of the borough Coroner, but, on the con trary, proved that the accident occurred out of his juris diction. His other objection was to the positive nonseace of the wording of the inqei , iti )n itself, and the Railway Company in whose behalf he made the present applica tion, were anxious to relieve tbernse:ves from the payment of 300/. twice over. • Mr. Justice Wv,HrmaN granted the certiorari, and said the case could be fully argued when the inquiiitions were returned to the Court on a motion to quash them. Certiorari granted. SHERIFF'S Co URT.-14 7 .. EDirivatr. GoItING V. TRELAWNEY. CRIS!. CON.—This was an action brought by Harry Dent Goting, Esq., against Edward Trelawney, Esq., sued as Edward Trelawney, to recover compensation in damages for criminal conversation with the plaintiff's wife. The plaintiff kid his damages in the declaration at 4;0001 ; and the defendant basing suffered judgment to go by default, the Jury, of whom Sir Henry Ellis was fore man, were now called upon to assess the damages under a writ of inquiry. Mr. Thesiger, Q. C., with Mr. Tyndal, appeared fir the plaintiff, and Mr. Austin and another Learned Counsel for the defendant. Mr. TIIESIGER having made the usual introductory speech about the heinousness of the offence, said that be t ak upon himself the responsidlity of coming to an ar rangement with his lamed friend Mr. Austin. With this view they had consul. ed together, and he was happy to inform the Jury that the result was that they would be save d the difficulty of assessing the damages, and would he permed Irons hearing the particulars of the most dis tressing and painful circumstance , connected with this ca. e. He had agreed to accept a verdict for the plaintiff for 1001. The Learned UNDER. SHERIFF—DO you, Mr. Austin, appear fur the defenda.:t and consent to a verdict being en tered for that sum ? Mr. AUSTIN—Yes, Sir, I think that is the best course that can be pursued, The Jury, under the direction of the Learned Under- Sheriff, then found a verdict fur the plaintiff, damages 1004 INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT.—APRIL 21. IN RE ROSS. The Insolvent had been out on bail, and applied for his discharge under the Act. In reply to Mr. COOKE, who appeared in opposition on the part of Messrs. Dixon, who held a bill• of exchange for 201., accepted by the insolvent. and endorsed to illessr, , . Wingfield, carpet manufacturers, of Bishopsgate-street, he stated, that he had been in partnership with his wife's nephew as a tobac conist, and in Mani], 1840, purchased carpets to the amount of 19/., from Messrs. Wingfield, for which he passed the acceptance forming the ground of the present opposition, payable in one month. He had been unable sirve to take it up, or pay any portion of it. In 1839 had executed a warr.,nr of attorney for 200/. in favour of his father-in-law, Mr. Thomas Turner, a gentleman who held a situation in the Custom-hou•e, and who has since seized upon all his sock and furniture—even the carpets bought from Mr. Wingfield were removed to his (\lr. Turner's) house in Camberwell. The de taining creditor was Thos. 'l'urner, junior, the insolvent's bro ther-in-law, to whom he was indebted only in the snm of 31. This was his third application to the Court to be discharged.. He first applied in 1635, when his debts were 8001. Mr. TAYLOR, a Solicitor, stated to the Court that he sued the insolvent on the bill of exchange, and in consequence of vexatious opposition, costs to the amount of 281 were accumu lated on the action. Criss-examined by Mr. WoouituFFE—He caused the venire of the suit to be laid in Herefordshire, as the Courts in London were not sitting, and he was anxious to expedite the execu tion. In consequence of changing the venire there was an increase of expense. The Insolvent's father-in-law and other witnesses having been examined, the Court adjourned the further hearing of the case for the appearance of the detaining creditor. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION.HOUSE. A waiter out of place, named Thomas Williams, was brought before Alderman Wils ,n, charged with having gone into the New England Coffee-House, for the pur. pose of committing a robbery. Mr. a,vis, one of the proprietors, stated that great coats and other articles of dress having been stolen at dif ferent times in the house, the pl in of hanging clothes upon hooks to ell'eh bells were attached was adopted, so that the moment any person endeavoured to take a coat, the bell which it covert d gave notice to those below. A bell in the upper part of the house having that morning given alarm, the waiter of the subscription-room ran up stairs ar.cl found the prisoner, who was wholly unknown there, in a state of confusion, and who no doubt had rung th.: bell, in the endeavour to commit a felony. The coat was not removed. The waiter said that the prisoner. upon being asked what he wanted in the house, sired that he called to meet a tall man, named Mr. Johnson, Alderman WasoN—You could not expect that Mr. Johnson was to be found et the top of the hnuFo ? Prisoner—l thought he might be found in any part of the house, Alderman WILSON said that the mode of prevention was an extremely good one, and he dared say it would be gene. rally adopted. The prisoner said thst he was in the habit of going all over houses, for he was a brokers' man, and was frequently in possession. The police stated that they knew the fellow to be a waiter out of place, and he was remanded till Saturday. A diminutive Jew, named Henry Sniidt, of particularly unprepossessing features, was brought up. He had ap peared in the streets with a hat and large plume, and de corated in the moat fantastic manner, on Monday night, at 12 o'clock, and attracted a crowd, among,t whom he did a great many preposterous things, which at length in duced a gentleman to lodge him in the station-house. A gentleman of the name of Brown stated, the- as he was welkin.. down Aldgate he caw the prisoner, who ap peared to he dressed for the character of Romeo, flourish.' ing a pistol about in a crowd ; and beßNing that he might do some mischief, seized him by the collar, and bore him off to the station-house. The prisoner sail, that when he was dons with his day's work he went to sing• at Mr. Abraham's public house, in the Whitechapel-road ; and, in order to give greener effect to the music, he dressed himself like Prince Orlando, Alderman WILsoNt How are you employed in the day-tine ? The pr isoner said he went his rounds with his clothes hag, and was a tailor by day. The gentleman was quite mistaken in supposing that he was doing any harm, for the pistol was one that would not go off for anybody. Alderman WiLsote said that the prisoner had by his folly got into confinen,ent for two nights and a day, and that, if he should again he found gathering together a crowd at an unreasonable hour, he should have a little practice at the tread-mil The little tailor was struck with consternation at this notice, and most humbly begged to be forgiven. He de clared that he should never again appear in such habili ments, and called R female, who said that be was a most industrious creature, and had engaged to sing in order to put a few shillings in his pocket. The prisoner was then permitted to depart. GUILDHALL. CAUTION TO TRADESMEN.—EIiza Harris, a young wo man, about 25 years of age, was placed at the bar, before Mr. Alderman MA G NAY, charged with endeavouring to pass base coin in the following ingenious manner : Mr. Less. 3 Langdon, stationer, of No. 46, Newgate-street, stated that the prisoner came into his shop and asked fo• a six penny bottle of ink, with which she was served, and gave half a-crown in payment, out of which she got. two shil lings change. She then asked if it would mark li nen, to which he replied in the negative ; and she said if that were the case, it was no use to her, laid down 2s. and requested to have the half-crown back. Having been served a ,imilar trick the day before, he took up one of the shilling pieces, and found it to be counterfeit, upon which the prisoner immediately snatched it from his hand and swallowed it. She was remanded to Saturday to have the attendance of Mr. Powell, the Solicitor to the Mint. Three men named Homes, Roberts, and Clements, were charged with robbing their employer, Mr.;William John Roper, iron and brass founder on Snow-hill. It appeared from the evidence that the prosecutor was in the habit of buying large quantities of cask•, and Clements, who was a cooper, used to supply him. When a dozen of casks would be delivered to the other two prisoners at the stores in Blacklong-alley, two, or perhaps three, would be returned, and again sold at the premises on Snow-hill. The prisoners were remanded to Friday. MARLBOROUGH -STREET. Thomas Hings, a very fashionably-dressed young man, was placed at the bar before DYER, on the following charge : Police constable No. 69, of the C division, stated that about eight :o'clock on Tuesday as he was on duty in Leicester square he heard the cry of " Stop thief!" and saw the prisoner running at his utmost speed, pursued by a gentleman As the prisoner was running he threw away a silk pocket handkerchief, which the gentleman picked up. Witness came up with the prisoner in Orange-street, and secured and took him back to the gentleman, who stated that he had de ected the prisoner in the act of taking the handkerchief out of his pocket, but de clined to proceed further in the matter. Prisoner (with much effrontery)—As the gentlemen knew it was a false charge he is afraid to appear against me. I shall seek my remedy against him. Mr. DYER asked if any person present in the Court could testify as to the prisoner being a common thief?- Inspector Baker, of the C division, stated that he had known the 'pri soner for many years as a reputed thief ; he had frequently been convicted, and was discharged from this office only on Saturday last, on a similar charge, through insufficiency of evidence. Mr. DYER—Under these circumstances I shall commit the prisoner, under the Police Act, f r three months to hard labour at the New Westminster Bridewell. QUEEN- ,s Q UA RE. Robert Marshall, a powerful - looking man, described as lurplighter to the Equitable Gas Company, was charged with assaulting Henry Prior Farr, a respectable looking mechanic about 60 years of age. The complainant stated that on the previous evening about six o'clock he was passing throughthe Willow-walk. Pimlico, when observing defendant lying in the road way in an apparently senseless state he went , owards him, and. finding his face much cut and coverci with bl iod ho wiped it with his handkerchief, and fetching defendant's hat, which was lying at some dis tance, put it upon his head, and then raised him up to a sitting posture. He had no sooner done this than the de.. fondant caught him by the skirts of his coat, and swore he had robbed hi:n of fourteen shillings. Complainant told defendant he did not know what he was say ing, and left him. He had reached the Mon ster public - house, which is at the extremity of the walk, when defendant ran up to him, and struck him two severe blows in the face, the si.c9nd which knocked him down, and defendant threw himself upon Lim. Wi , ll much difficulty he escaped into a house, whether defendant was following him when a policeman took him into custody The defendant said he was so drunk at the time, that he did not know vihat lie did, but he was certain he had been robbed. Mr. Barefoot, an Inspector of the B division said, that the complainant was searched at the station-house by his (run desire, and only one sixpence was found upon him. Mr. BURRELL —I never for a moment supposed the complainant would have committed a dishonest action, but he'has done a foolish one in interfering, though it was a humane motive that prompted him to do so, with such a fellow as the defendant, who has so shamefully trumped up a charge of filony agai,st him, and after wardsso brutally assaulted him. I shall fine him, 40'., or, in default, commit him for a month and hard labour. The defendant was lucked up. CIRCUIT COURT. INVERNESS, APRIL 15.—The Circuit Court of Jus ticiary was opened here this day by Lords Mackenzie and Medwyn. TRIAL FOR MURDER. Peter Cameron, Ballintomh of 'Knockando, was placed at the bar, charged with the murder of his father-in•law, Alexander lulloch, farmer, Crofthead of Ballintomb or Knockando, on the 17th day of October last. The circumstances attending this horrid deed are already well known to our readers. The panel pled guilty of killing Tulloch, but not with intent to murder. Tile Court refused to accept the plea, and the case went to proof. Isabella Tulloch, Crofthead—Alexander 'Tulloch was witness's father, and she lived with him at Crofthead. Besides witness and father, her sister and Cameron and his wife lived in the house. Mrs. Cameron is her sister. Knew Mrs. Beaton, who lived at the mansion house of Knockando; that her father intended to be married to her That matter had been communicated to Cameron and his wife as well as to witness, and was disagreeable to Cameron, who was not to remain at the farm after the marriage. Cameron spoke to witness about it, and was displeased, because he thought her father was marrying too soon after her mother's death. Cameron was to leave at the term. Remembers her father's body was brought home on Saturday, the 17th of October. Mrs. Beaton lives at the house of Knockando. Knew Mr. 'rulloch, Crofthead. There were proposals of marriage between them. Mr. Tulloch visited her about nine o'clock on Saturday morning. Saw him go out of the door. The road from her house to Bailin tomb passed over a burn, where there is a foot bridge. Tuloch was in perfect health when he le't her. Never saw him alive after. He told her that he had commu nicated his intended marriage. Toll her about Came ron wanting a share of his fitrm, which he relused, and he appeared sulky after the re!usil. Cameron was leave at the term of Martinmas, whether Tulloch mar ried or not. Alexander Beaton lives at Millhaugh of ildlintorob, a short distance from the ford of the burn. Passed no,r the ford about seven o'elack on Saturday morning. bert was with him. Observed something o 1 ther•)ail lea l ing from Knockando House to Crotthea 1, on K lock ando side. There had been a good de it of rain toat night and previous day. The burn was pretty inueh swollen that night, but had fallen a little before they came up. Observed footmarks on the road, and ca, I,d George filbert's attention to them, who said there had been drubk people there ; but witness said that h e rather thought there had been fighting. There were a great many marks on the road. Observed nothing else ; but went down to his father's to help to thatch sow stacks, and before he got on his stockings, the little girl, Mary Ruff, came crying that there was a man lying in the burn. Both Gilbert and witness went down and saw the body lying in the burn. The body was Lei by some large stanes, which pre vented it from going down the burn. There w no hat ; did not know whose body it was. not lift the body out of the burn till he got more people. It was then lifted out and laid on the hank. Recagni , ed it to be the body of Tulloch. S try seven.' injuries about the head, a good deal of blood about the nose, a cut above the brow, and one on the top of the head. John Bell, mason, Clune, went to Cnurch on Sun day 18th October, and heard what had happened at Crofthead. Wife told him Cameron was in the barn ; went to see him. Witness sail to him that the last time he saw him he did not expect to see him in this way. Prisoner said he did not expect that himself. He said he had done it. Witness had twfore heard that Cameron had killed Tutoch. The prisoner said that he had done what he never intended. Witness said to prisoner that he wondered when he was waiting under the bushes that some reflection did not come over his mind to prevent him. Prisoner said he did not int .nd to kill him, but to give him a thrashing. Prisoner said as much as led witness t , ) believe that he wanted to prevent him from going to visit Mrs. Beaton—he supposed to prevent the marriage. Prisoner said that Tulloch had told him that he was to leave the farm. Prisoner told him that he rushed upon Tul loch from behind ; and that Mr. Tulloch had got hold of him by the neckloth, and almost choked biin and had , 9r L l ,••wn on his knee;—that Mr. Tulloch uttered some hurried which s irritated him, that he took the stick out of .7',2loch's hand and struck him across the head. Prisoti;..or saii; that he never spoke, but Tulloch discovered him ant i uttered those words,; and the prisoner then struck him. I,7,H'ess does recollect, but he thinks that he spoke about being in the burn. Remained in his house three or fon: . days. Was not there during the day, but came back at night. Witness's wif, is a relation of pris,mer. Cross,exainined—Prisoner's family resiLd in hi. neighbourhood, Knew him well before he went to Croftlicad. Witness has seen many a thing that led ti;rn to believe that he had not the common judgment of other men. Does not recollect any particular in stances Prisoner was of a religious disposition. Dr. Cruickshank, Elgin, went to Cro'thead w ith the Sheriff and Procurator-Fiscal on the 17th of Oc tober, and examined the body of Mr. Tull o ch. The A.herinur, f p rom which it ap c l ued by him- Doctor then read two m edical reports drawn hp self and Dr. Stephen, that there were seven or eight different wounds about the heal and neck. That those on the head had been inflicted with a blunt instrument. Th,_, marks on the utck might, have bven wade by the hand or a Bolt liga- MORNING FDITJ(W. lure. No such appearance would have existed dr ° had merely been knocked down and drowned. The ADVOCATE DEPUTE addressed the Jury, " concluded by calling on them to return a verdict &d l s the panel guilty of murder as libelled. Mr. E. GORDON, advocate, addressed the Jells behalf of the panel, and hoped the result of their deli' beration would be a verdict of culpable homicide , verdict which would leave it opti ona l f or the presid ia Judges to inflict the most severe t i ne punishment except capital punishment of death. Lord MACKENZIE then charged th e Jury, and we nt over the evidence at vary great length, and stated tbt it was cot necessary to prove intention to murder, b u that if a person committed a serious assault on anetbU e ' which ended in de,th, he was guilty of the capital elit e of murder. The present case appeared to bun t" very clear, and he thought it possessed all the v 4. 1•„ features of a most barbarous murder ; but if the ...!ey doubt, they should give the prisoner the benefi t of that doubt. • Tice Jury retired at about nine o'clock r.m., ° ey after remaining in consultation for half en .hour r, turned into Court, and returned a verdict unaniafeeSil finding the prisoner guilty of Culpable Homicide. ~ Lord MEDWYN s t a t e d th a t h e h a d n o doubt' L"; Jury had returned a verdict according to their c 7; science ; but he thou g ht th a t if th e crime which the panel had committed was no t mur d er it was the rieg', — • a to it he'had ever he ar d o f. Aft er a f ew re marks,l Lordship prop o s e d th a t th e p ane l b e transported lore seas during the term of his natural life. Lord MACKENZIE then addressed the panel at edu t d length, and concluded by passing sentence, as proPol u ed by Lord Medwyn—that the panel be tratoPu el beyond seas during the term of his natural life. THE MAIthETS.-YESTEKDAY . CORN EXCHANGE. a ll, The fresh arrivals of Grain since Mond l y have been 5- jot but plenty remained over from that day. Wheat dull, at Oa t quotations. In Barley and Beans very little doing. Thetis buyers still held off, and in consequence scarcely any sale / . made. Flour as last reported. • NENVGA l'E AND LEADENHALL. ola The supplies were to a f a i r e x t en t ; t ra d e ra ther dull, b price little variation took place. Lamb declined 2d. t 0 4, 1•, stone. The supply of Poultry was moderate; trade • brisk, and prices muc h th e same as li st quote d. Hares.t: Ducks, 2s. to 3s. ; Wild ditto; ls. 9d. to 2s. 6d. ; Chic' - to Is. 9d. to 2s. 6d. ; Rabbits, 6d. to Is. 9d. ; GoslingS, l s tss 10s. ; Ducklings, 6s. to 9s. ; Pea F ow l, 7 s . t o 10 9 . ; G ly ; Fowl, 3s. to 4s. ; Turkeys, ss. to 9s. ; Pigeons, 6d tt i to Large Surrey Fowls, 6 s . to 10 s . ; S ussex Chickar.s, 3 5 . rdkh ss. ; Barn-door, 2s. 9d. to 3e. ; Fowls, 35. to ss. each ;,;, 0 1, Is. per dozen, fine stock for shipping ; Ducks. 275. ; fZia 48s. to 545. ; Turkeys, 48s. to 545.; Guinea Fowls, . 7 'per 335. per dozen ; fine Pigeons for shooting, 10s. to lg s *. dozen; Eggs dull of sale, and prices lower, 4s. 6d.i. 0- 6(1. per 120. COLONIAL MARKET. The market generally was heavy, and prices u 1 1 . 5%, to The public sales were large, the merchants being deshyl o is realize, kept prices low, but we look for a reaction as the 7 0 - e st advances. B. P. Sugar was taken in small quantities, t ° . 0 , . the demands of the trade, and prices were lower. 01-o $ 5 . , 64a. to 6iis.; Yellow, 665. 6d. to 70s. ; and Fine, 71'. wil l s; 6d. per cwt. In Refined Sugar there was a slight dee, Srandari Lumps sold at 925. 6d. to 935. per cwt. ; better prices. good quality went off more freely, and at some what s prices. Rice dull, but not cheaper. Spices genera c loy slow sale, yet prices were well sustained - or e of Pepper and Cassia Likr,nea._ TEA MARKET. The Market was very fi rm genera lly, and a fair bu s t e : s . was done. No parcels were pressing for sale, the holde r % of ing an impres ion that notwith s t a ndi n g th e resumpti on be trade with China, T ea canno t, tinder any circums'an ce r ; i er sent to this country for a long time to come, to pay t he R as chants at present rates. The rate of Company's Congoo. Is. 51d. per lb. cash buyers. TALLOW MARKET. o f t he The transactions were confined to the bare want s Foe consumers, who were obliged to pay higher prices. quality 48s. per cwt. COAL M Ships arrived since S. d., Adair's Bell, Hobson.* Co. Hartley 15 I.lolyweil Main !7 Oirglna' Windsor's Pontop 11 3 Pontop Windsor Smith's Pontop... . l5 tii south Hartley l5 6. Tanfield M00r... VrilliAm's Hartley l5 0 Wyla Walls End Hilda. ..... Walls End Nor hu berla .d 19 W. E. HraddylPsi-lettoa 0 Walls End 1 - 101,y l9 Wails End Hetton 22 [A 'MET. last market day, 69. Walls s s E E n n d d S. 01 0 Walls End Pemberton ....... Walls End' Russell's 1-lettcni Walls End S"ewart's ......... a ml e t o l I t; ........... 05 0 Walls-End W hawe ll .......... Walls End Carmine ........... 2 2 0 Walls End Kelloe ........ 18 0W Ills End Gordon ...... 10 V , all: End Seymour Tees... i g 3 Walls End South Durban.. . ;I 0 .. Wal a End '1 ees ........... . ig 0 Walls End West z l e tton ; s Henley ........................ IRISH MARKETS. OUBLIN MARKET NOTE for the WEE. From 618 Wheat,per barrel 'et M0ue.. . ... 29 o 0 Bere 521 Barley ... 16 stout l5 0 581 Data stem...... 12 0 Four, per cwt... 472 0atmea1..,.,.......,. R stone..„ Sold to Bakers only. I $ L 0,827 Cwt. flour ......... ... . ........... 10 0 1 8d24 per 144 0 Average pin J e ....... arta Flour 51.0 d Fags .... from 25 * °(i 3 1s A l Receipts of Flour. ll ,073 from 15, ed. to o d f.3a l .‘ of Do. 12,39 ti heron o , od I2J Third.* from 10s. • eliding APRIL' 16' To 39 0 ii 0 IV 6 14 6 .... 0 15 0 i rralfe' 33 3 13 lib 10 12 10 13 I -: 0 12 0 PRICK OP am rAn. ' . 4 . Ad. Quarter,. Loa. Barley (per uist.)ll 0 14 0 1t .1 " ..- od. Is ali Vt..' tern i ,,' ' ' coith MARKETS —A i Pril - 11 8d t 0134 .641 Wheat (per 209t.)45F 0 1.,(t.; 31, 0 1.0,04,c , . Per -- " I ' II 0 24 " ; Od to 105 0 Oattreal iper ttwt ) *** - *.4'. , . 1 to 6d . Reef, 4d. to 7,1 . , '"" ** 50 - rn Ret...-Vea., 4- • !lan, • • Pork, 4ld. to sd. - h Buttct 10d. tr. Ild per lb. -....t reS Pawg OF fl UTTER. To the Couratrj. Quality-...,,,,,T0 the Icrchants. Fu•st Quality-. * . , • 91,' , ,;• :second - i ********* .a. 106 . ........." "......" ****** . 86 'Altird ... ......... .. d Fourth Fifth 1 0 ..........•••••••g. ... Sixth CLON 111 ELL SI A nKETS —April 17 it l'e . t wi, , 1. 19 ' a. d. a. d. i • c Os 0, 0 New flutter IS 0 tcloo 0 tides crawl...". •••• ," " .1 5 i Oatmeal l2 0 14 3 ii2COIIIP tc5............. 42 ',:, .0 . Rendered Lard --0 52 J ticad5...............21 , .0 Per Bag, i'l • Fleur, Second 0 FS a I k lour 0t..rd5........- 0 „ 0 . —Household...— 1' 36 01 Founts..... 20 0 ", • Per Barrel. 15 0 Rapeseed...." ...... 211 0 —Ol Barley ... 12 ,t • ißere lO 0I ir viii ........••••••••••• ' „, M KILKENNY kAltKtib. te me W.eat s perbarrel)2B: Od.to .iss od. Beef ..er lr ........ Or. (Id. 0 i • liarl2y l4 0 15 I) Niti...e , ..........„ 0 5 0 "vats l4 0 15 ,- Pori .Do 6 4 0 f a ' Flour (rter bag)....20 0 138 0 Ves ............, ,0 6 i .. Butter(percwt.)...oo 0 10 , - 0 ,rest? Butter .. 0 0 010 Bacon Pigs .........38 (I 42 6 `ialt Ditto .......... 0 6 it 6 Coals 1 0 1 2 Eotatoes t per sL) 11 9 • The High Constable of Brighton has ca'n ej'te meeting of the inhabitants of that place, to petition r a rc h. mom for the entire and unconditional abolition of ClOO, s rates. The mectiog, which has been called pursuant respectable requisition. is fixed for to-morrow. PATENT LEVER WATCHES, with s tr .: o o engine-turned double-backed gold cases, Fourteen 6°l ati ael each, with silver engine-turned cases, seconds, hard en dial, Six Guineas each. 41 0 This celebrated construction (the most accurate on °rot a warch can be made) is now offered, with the latest inWholeso merits, i. e., the detaehed escapement, jewelled in four _ O O capped, hand to mark the seconds, maintaining poser to con going while winding up, at the above price. 'ls A printed warranty is given, with fixed terms, on vr-13 Ie tye Watches will always receive any attention requifed. T. COX SAVORY, Watchmaker, Jeweller, &c., 47, Cornhill (Seven doors 1114 , . Gracechurch-street), London. Second-hand Watches purchased in exchang SPOONS. FORKS, 6r.e., superior to Silver te l'3 . ; rability, equal in appearance. Table Spoons or Forks, ;10, Dessert, 10s. ; Tea Spoons, ss. per dozen; 'fable Cand le ` ti inches high, is. per pair ; the particular metal of 45 t oil these articles are made is so like silver, that it can only U e fo . from it by the stamp; every article made in silver manil tured in this material by iiIPPON and BURTON, Wells-street, Oxford•stret.es. Who, to prevent imposition, confine the sale of it to them! e Catalogues of prices gratis. __sm.!! -'l° BIRT On the 16th inst.. the lady of JH . S A. Vesey Kirktan& -1-sci‘' of the Cldstream Guards, of a sn. On the 19th inst., at York-plac o e, Citcsroad, the lady 01. Mason, Esq., surgeon, of a son. , of • On the 19th ins , ., in Fitzroy Farm, Hi g hgate, the George Ilasevi daughter. the 19th , inst., , at Cheltenham, the lady of Ch arles Hartord, Esq., of Elbw Vale, Monmouthshire, of a son.. itb , On the 19th inst., in New Bond - street , M rs. Henry Slll of a son. On the 10th inst., at the Crescent, Clapham-comrn ondiri. William Brown, of a daughter. MARRIED. r Ili On the 20th inst. , a t Storrin g ton, b y the Rey. W. BraP - i e Rector, CLaplain-in-Orclinary to her Alajesty, John Hard' to second daughter of Leek-, E,, q ,,. of Cullensword House, County Dublin , 1 Isabella Eliza Wilmot, daughter of the late Lieutenant-Col on Edward Eardly Wilmot, Royal Horse Artillery. On the 19th insl: •s at St. Pancras, Joseph Francis °n i t t. Giles 's Esq., M.D., o f Paz is, to Laura, WilliP - Cuhitt, Esq., of Meck:enburgh-sqnare. On the 'kith inst., at .5 Lavender, of Bermondsey street, to Ellen, eldest daught er 0 Church, Camberwell. liri W. Crosby, Esq. , of Burdett. •Place, Ohl Kent-road. On the 20th in st , at St. Jai, Church, the Hon. Charlei R. St. John, to Jane, daughter ,')f the late T. Gibson , E s r' f On the 2 0 th inst., at St. Mary : , 7 Newington, Johner Ilelltii, Kolle, Esq.. of Lower Edmonton, t l Mary, daught of late Henry Palmer, Esq., of St. Eli z lbettL's Jalllaic .. , DIED. On the 18th inst., at Leaminifton, the Ea On the 13th inst., at Alil hill, West Co 'sea, Louisa 1%.- i Osborne, second daughter of the Rev. Edwaid Osborne • 7 0, On the 16th inst., at King's-Fara . cle Chelsea... Mrs. 1 Ficanora Phillips, widow, aged 76. ' st con On the 16th inst., at Northampton, Frederic, you'llge tl of Belmore•—eue of Mr. Samuel Richardson, of that dace late Rev. T. Fountaine, formerly Preb ndary V-,f t On the 17th inst., at Barnes, ' rs l . Fo.untaine, widow' On the 18th inst., at Ovenden, Kent, 'William C*4.3" Esq., aged 66. coo' v On, of Great the l'-qh inst., Alexander Fraser, Esq. street, aged 76. ,, Qopli ia ' On the 19th inst., at Camden House, reading, Ellen '.. third k 4 ,sughter of Jilin Richards, jun., E , q•, age d e s ' f C. I% ' On tn e t: . ;!li inst., at Dover, Alary Jane, wit 0 Of Worceatol4cor Smith, Esq., of C,';..orn's-hill, Greenwich, aged 34 lic ' t 0 f ;11r• G. On the 19th inst., Airs. Alice Jul iet Cape, re Cape, late of Ampton- street, Regent square. itiiticho?O'' On the 19th inst., John Waterh ouse, Esq., ' hill, Middlesex. At Twickenham, Henry Hawkins, Esq. , aged 80' . 0 f VCl ll ° l At Brighton, Alice Morley, youngest dau g hter ~0 , Ramsay, Esq., of Brunswick s quare. -r o h o Clari'r On the 14th inst., in Castl eg ate, Yorkshire, J Esq., aged 83. ii, aged 3.1 ,e 11 Ax l e On W t . Barber, Esq ,of Fulham-road, Bron p Gerrard's-cross, Bucks, Mr. G. Russ i e T ttenha , tOll, ac e On the 16th inst., John Pearson, Esq ,of 0 Advocate -General of Bengal, aged 70. .----.....•-riiiiitrii...........—,...----____ of London Printed and Published by 111.11 DO Stl,lllo ia No. 1 12, Strand, at The Sun Office, No. 112 the cowl* of Middlesez.o.Thursday , Ap ril :;1 , 1641' ir T The DI Et ( t6?GlIA111 WV I ANT N dbitr.liatnent) iii;',Tfug., as a h i , VII 5001 Li 2 'we, six, a-,7est warran and p 1, - ,7,!hester, on ' 4ll c due dui s r t c43ultos_settlirte.ese,l, ars, 1111 ' be obi 51anch E A ' 75' tk i le, Public ; k i a.AND 4,LINGTC TheTrai k It. FRC 1 4 6 ♦. Nr. —1 1 ft v ••u.-7 1430 P.m. 7 i 0 P. AI. --( o P. aL —'] 0 FRC A. 3t. 4 " A. 31. —( n fr wo 4. 31. —I :I n -v r. 51. —I i A v P. 31. -I ci o u ~' T TManhood, I.o,,Lahust. In eractieal o! s to which is By GO, Omnibus e Si ce fleas Its frugal ; k f t . r ~4tiE SYP r'enta e l to F .- e e , ar attending 4, 4 ti St i erllll ;;"es illustr4 Quo fugit Wh* 414 1, t he i e casfly laic ' 4 . jll;,.rice ceof of t 1 ~71"4 to "! the jut th e Impress 1 1), t „ 1)° 1)ii, cou m the ha