The Sun. — London, England, 1819-03-23 00:00:00

nas Okr,:larged, and a new Order made for that day (Monday) se'nnight. BARNSTAPLE. On the motion of Lord CLIVE, it was ordered, that the Speaker should not issue his warrant to the Clerk of the Crown to make out a new Writ for the Borough of Barnstaple until after Monday .next: It was then ordered, that the Report of the .!..;elect Committee on the Barnstaple Election should be taken into consideration on Monday next. CHIMNEY-SWEEPERS. Mr. .BENNF,T, adverting to the failure in ano ther place of the Bill which he had had the honour to introduce into that House, gave -notice, that on Wednesday the 31st instant, he would move for leave to bring in a Bill to regulate the Trade of Chimney-sweepers. Mr. IVILsoNT presented a petition from the In habitants of St. George's, Bloomsbury. agwinst the renewal of the Insolvent Act.—Reterred to the Committee on the subject. MESAGE FROM THE LORDS A NlessAge hum the Lords auttotinced their Lordships' assent to several l'ilvate Bits, auti re quesied that the I-loose ut Common. would send them a Copy 01 the Re v olt of ,he Committee on the Police of the Mrtrophlis, in 1816; as also the Firist, Second, and Third Reports ot the Com mittees, in 1817 and 1818, on the same subject. The Messengers were ititi;rined, thai the House would send An answer by 'Messengers ot its own. GOVERNOR NI'QUIRM E. Mr. BROUGHAM gavC notice, that he would to morrow piesett a Peiiiion from certain inhabit ants of New SonthlV,des, con t.:ming of the con duct of GOTernor MiQuarrir. CLANDESTINE MARRIAGE BILL. On the motion of Dr. PHILLtmoRE, the ccennd readin!! of tits Clandestine 'Marriage Act Amend ment Bill was postponed to Friday. PENIt YN. The ()tiler of the Day having been read for taking into int ther consideration the Report of the Committee on the Penryn Election, • Mr. ATKINS WRIGHT moved that the Resolu tions he read a second time, which was done, and they were approved of. Mr. ATKINS WRIGHT then moved, that Henry Swami, Esq. had been guilty bribery at the last Election for the Borough ut Penryn, and that be W as [hereby incapacitated (ruin sitting in the pre terit Parliament. After a few inaudible wards from a Member . , whose name could not be learned, the Resolution was e.. reed to. Mr. A. WRIGTIT proceeded to move, tleat the Attorney-Generoi be directed to prosecute Fleury Swann, E,cl. for Bribery at tie hut Election for the Borough of Penryn. _ _ r.il VALE STINg ISLAKE trusted tbrit the House would not. ; , unish the innocent with the guilty, by disfranchisipg the Borough. T • e npl7ion was then avrcerl to, av, was ntso subsequent inc.:ion, directing the Attornev-Ge oeral to prosecute John ‘S'6o,lyear, Henry buns und Abraham Vv' inn, for corrupt practices influencing the said election. CONSOUDAI ED FUND. On the motion of the CHANCELLOR of the Ex- CHFQUEi?, !he Cons°lirkted Fund Produce Bill and the Exehequkl. Bills in Aid Bill were read a third time and passed. WINDSOR ESTABLISHMENT. On Lori CASTLI3RFAGICS motion, the Royal Booseh(.1(1 s,.:ls read a third time and passed. The Qualification of Electors' Bill was read a second time, and ordered to be committed next Friday. EAST INDIA GRANT. Mr. Floworyrn, alluding to a notice which had appeared its the public papers, calling a meeting of East India Proprietors, to consider of the pro priety of making a grant of One Hundred 'not).- RAM! Pounds as a reward for the late sersices in India, wished to know whether such a measure had received the sanction of the Board of Con troul he should consider such a step as prema ture ?' The Vote of Thanks lately passed had been confined to :he military operations, and had care fully excluded e very other consideration. Yet it w as now proposed to vote 100,0001., as if every thing had been explained in the most satisfactory manner. The public were materially interested in the disposal of the territorial revenue of India, and it was probable that in a short time the at tention of the House would be called to the subject. Mr. CANNING trusted the Honse would enter tain no doubt of Isis readiness in giving every in fortnAtion required. But it the Hon, Gentleman considered the vote premature, to propose which a notice had been inserted in the papers, it would be still more premature for him (Mr. C.) to ex press any opinion upon it in that House. The tpsestion could only come before him its case the Court of East India Directors had recommended such a vote to the proprietors, and the latter had adopted the recommendation. It would have then been submitted for confirmation to the Board of Control. But the vote had not yet passed, and for aught any one knew might never pass. It would be therefore most inconvenient and iinpro per in him to deliver a hypothetic opinion. Mr. Hosvoturn was perfectly aware that the Court of Directors had the power of originating any measures; but the Constitution had wisely placed their determinations under the Board of Control, whose vigilance he hoped would not relax. IRISH CORN. Sir J. NEWPORT, adverting, as was understood, to some Government Contracts for Corn of British growth, excluding Corn the growth of lirland, in direct contravention of the Act of 1806, asked on what ground the restriction was wade ? So - G. IVARRENDER observed, Gat the Scotch Coro %vas tqually excluded ‘vith the Irish, and attributed tLe exclusion to the difficulty of ob t,iiiing the supply in the winter season. It was to be recollected, that Ireland hail the monopoly in the supply of salt provisions. Znr J. NEWPORT contended, that no difficulty had ever h: en experienced in corm ying corn front Ireland to Plymouth, Portsmouth, &c. CONIMITTFEE OF SUPPLY. The I-louse having ;es°ivy! itself into a Com mittee of Supply, on Mr. LoNG'S motion, several Resolutions were moved and adopted, to make up deficiencies left by certain grants of last year. On the motion that 60,0001. be granted for the Peni tentiary House at 'Milbank, Mr. Alderman Wool . ) inquired whether that would he sufficient to complete the sum wanted for that establishment ? Mr. LONG stated that about 40,0001. would he required next year to complete the whole accord ing to the estimates. Mr. Alderman Wool) complained of the erec tion of R steam engine for grinding corn in that prison, where the prisoners themselves ought to be made to work. Such an expellee was - Unne cessary. Mr. Lot contended that the whole had been conducted with the greatest attention to economy. The Jail fistd been originally intended for 800 pri soners. It had now been enlarged to such an ex• tent as to contain one thousand; and the expense had been increased in a fair proportion to the original estimate. The object of the steatn gi,-e was to grind corn, and supply the building with water, which in so large a building, and for such a 11111111)er of petsolit, could not he done by manual labour. Such work, besides, would not be likely to improve the prisoners, and the prin ciples on which they were employed was that of teaching them such arts as would enable them to gain their livelihood when they should have the fail. Mr. Alderman WOOD maintained that there was a prison in France in which 20- persons supplied 5000 wi!is Ater a few words from Mr. B6NNET and Mr. Ilot.roon. Lord NUGENT stated, that in the jail of the town which he had the honour to represent, a vet tical wheel had been erected at the expense of 180 or 2001. It was worked by eight men, and with so much success, that a proposal had been made to supply the whole town, containing 5000 inhabitants, with water. For that Purpose,. five hoots' labour every clay on the part of tl►e eight men he bad mentioned,would have been sufficient. and the water could be raised to a height of 70 feet from the bed of the river. Mr. LONG said, that it had been a question with the Committee, whether more might not be lost by employing the prisoners in raising the water, instead or giving them other work, than the erection of a steam engine would cost, and the latter had been adopted on the ground of eco nomy. A desultory conversation ensued, in which BROUGHAM, Mr. flumkt, Mr. LONG, LORD No- GENT, Mr. HocFoRD, and Mr. W.:nit:rut, partici pared ; alter whichthe Resolution was ag re ed to. Mr. LONG then proposrd 21,0001. for the Ex pences of the Penitentiary House. tram the 24th of June, 1819, to the same day• IB2o.—A gree d to. On the Resolution that 50,0001. be granted to cArry on the lniaud Navigation between the two seas, . _ - - Lord CAUHAMPTON objected chiefly to the name of Caledonian Canal, is Caledonia had celsed to exist in the third century. Ile wished to know at once how much would be required to com plete that nuriert aking ? also compl a i ne d t h at great numbers of English, Welch, and Irish,.were employed, instead of the native labourers. Lord BINNING stated that 80,0001. would be wanted on the whole, so that 001y,30,0001. would remain to he granted, if the present Resolution were agreed to. As to the English, Irish, and Welch employed, they did not amount to one in seventy. lit 1819 there were but 3 English, 1 Welch, and I Irish, all the rest wete Scotch, and Ihe whole employed in the Eastern Division were 240. The canal had been undertaken at the pressing• solicitations of the Brltlc trade in the North of Sco►land, the %Vest of England, and the North of Ireland, and had already produced much good. From the 7th of April to the ;4th of No vember last, 152 voyages had been made upon Lochness, without any accident. After a few observations from Mr. tlontß, the CHANCELLOR Of the EXCHEQUER, Mr. WILLIAM SMITH. and Mr. Alderman \VooD, the Resolution watt agreed to. The House then resumed, and the Report was ordered to be received to-morrow. A new ‘Vrit was ordered for the County of Monmouth, in the room of Lord GRANVILLE SO MERSET, who had accepted the office of one of the Lords of the Treasury since his Election. TRIAL BY BATTLE. The ATTORNEY•GENERAL having moved the third reading of the Trial by Battle Abolition Bill, Sir ROBERT WILSON briefly stated, that he thought with certain modifications the principle of the ancient law ought to be preserved. He would propose that the right of appeal should be attached to offences for which the accused had been regularly committed, and a bill of indictment regularly found. He should also wish to allow the Presiding Judge to suspend the execution, and to place the power of pardoning with the twelve Judges of England. With the view of introduc ing such alterations, he moved that the Bill be read this day three weeks. Mr. Alde►man Noon said a few words in sup port of the Amendment. The House divided— For the Third Reading For the Amendment 2 Majority for the Third Reading ---62 The Bill was then read a third time and passed. Sir Wm. DOUGLAS moved for and obtained leave to king in a Bill for the better protection of Savings Banks in Scotland. Lord PALIKLItSTuN presented Ecverfil public Accounts liolll the ‘Var Drparttnent.—Oidered to lie on the table. Mr. Hume moved for several documents from the India .Department, respecting tie state of the account relative to the Debts of the Nabob of the Carnatic.—Ordered. Mr. BitooneN moved the committal for to morrow of the Alkali Doties Adjoufued. PARLIAMENTARY PAPERS. MIL T. W. GRADY AND THE IiON. W. QUIN. The Nlncures of the EVIDENCE, taken at the Bar of the House of Commons in the matter of this Complaint, i►ave been printed by order of the Howie of Commons, of which the following is time s►►bstance : THURSDAY, MARCH ii . Mr.CattawSmYrst,who was the first witness exa . - mined, deposed, that he was a practising Barrister at the Irish Bar for 16' years. On the 21st of September last he called upon Mr. Quin, in com pliance with the request of the Petitioner and his father, in order to know from Mr. Quin what were his intentions with respect to the disposal of the Clerkship of the Peace for the County of Lime rick ? Mr. Quin stated that his mind was made up, that this office was to be transferred from the petitioner to Mr. Richard Smith. Witness alluded (o an engagement which he understood that Mr. Q. had made with Petitioner not to disturb him in Iris office. Mr. Q. denied any promise, but ad mitted that he. said to Petitioner, " upon my honour, Grady, I should he very sorry to tom you out of your office," adding, " I assure you, Mr. Smyth, I am now very sorry to do it, but I must do it." Mi. Q. further observed that he was advised he could appoint. Mr. Smyth doritmg pleasure, and that he meant to have 2001.. a year ,out of the 4001;which the office yielded settled upon the Petitioner, " hot . ," said Mr. Q. " 1 expect in return that Mr.,G.,and his family should remain politically united with me in the county of Limerick."— Witness to this expressed some disapprobatioo, " not," said.be, " 1 believe by words, but by a [notion of my head." Mr. Q. then said, " I am sure you must he satisfied that time proposition make is reasonable, for I should have a quid pro quo for the grant I give Mr. Grady, and you are aware that this is all the patronage belonging to the office of Custos Rotulorum, which 1 have lately obtained." Witness asked how far this pledge of support was to be carried, " because,'' said he, " you most be aware. Mr. Q., that as., your father,. Lord Mount Earle, is advanced in years, you are likely soon to be called to the Upper House, and do you mean in that case to have the influence of Mr. Grady and family trans ferred to any Candidate whoM you choose to sup port ?" to which Mr. Q. replied, '' certainly.' Witness•then observed, that as much misunder standing had arisen as to the cons mtrnications which had taken .place between Mr. Q. and other-Gen tlemen on this subject, it would be satisfactory:to have this conversation reduced to writing. Mr,Q. expressed his acquiescence,. and he looked about the room, but there was no writing apparatus in it. Here the witness stated that: this conversa tion took place sit the country house of Mr. Goold, within three miles of Dublin. Mr. Q. then said, " I shall be in Dublin to*morrow at three o'clock,. and if • you will be so good as to commit , it to writing when you go home, I shall call upon you then and look over it with you."—Witness said, that never thinking he should be called upon in this public way, he took no. other note of this, conversation than afterwards appears, nor. dirt, lie keep any copy of letters written•by him with re gard to .this transaction. Witness• wrote an ac-. count of this conversation to both the Petitioner and his 'father, on the evening of the day on which it took place, and these letters being sheyyo he recognized them. Ott the.morniog of the,,2241 of September witness again saw Mr. Q. in company witit Mr. Goold. They called at his house at 1 I o'clock in time morning. Mr. , Q, asked, on enter ing his room, " Smyth, have you reduced our conversation to writing ?"—to which witness an swered in the negative, observing that he did not expect Mr. Q; until three o'clock, and that if Mr... Q. would sit down he would immediately write down the conversation. Mr. Q said, that as he was going to the Lord Lieutenant's audience, he ; could not wait—but Mr. Q. expressing a desire to have the conversation repeated, witness did so, and Mr. Q declared the repetition to be perfectly correct. Witness immediately afterwards sent the Minute of the conversation to Mr. Goold, and ?4r. Q. accompanied by Mr. G. Called again upon witness between three anti four o'clock, with that minute, which Mr. Q. declared to he correct, only requiring a slight alteration, which was made accordingly. But upo9 witness saying"to Mr..Q.' " you can have now no objection to sign ing it," Mr. Goold interposed, " I think it right to apprise yon, that I have advised Mr. Quin not to sign that paper, for you must see that it contains something relating to the dis posal of the profits of an office connected with the administration of jastice, which I think it right -a Member of Parliament should not sign, but I ant ready at any time to come forward and testify that Mr•. Quin in my presence acknowledged it to be correct." Witness added,. that on the first visit of Mr. Q. to his house on the 22d.Septem her, Mr. Q. withdrew his proposition that the Petitioner and his family should be celled upon to vote for any Candidate whom he (Mr. Q ) might think proper to support in the event o f hi s accession to the Peerage.—(Here the minute of the conversation alluded to was read.)—Subse quent to this interview, witness wrote to Mr. Goold, observing, that there was a mistake in The minute which.it was desirable, to correct. as Mr. Q. had promised to arrange for the payment of the 2001. a year to the Petitioner trout the Clerk of the Peace for the time being, whereas itt that minute it was confined to Mr. Richard Smith, and in answer to this letter witness received the followhigkahswer "My dear Smyth,--I received your note, and perfectly con cur in the statement you made. Mr. W. Quin authorizes me to say, that your recollection is perfectly accurate, and of course there can remain no,: no kind of difference upon the subject. " 1 am, my dear Smyth, " Sept. 25, 1818. " Your's, most truly ' " Carysfort Lodge." " THOS. Gt)OLI)." Witness, in consequence of letters trout the Petitioner and his father, called (Ilion Mi. Quin at his cotintry-house, near Limerick, in October last. Lk Frevionsly communicated with Mr. Jlannsci!, and Mr. D. O'C'irridy. Mr. Q. denied to witness that he authorized any one to deliver message to Petitioner, stating that be (Petitioner) was " as free as air," and at liberty to vote ,tot whom be pleased ; Mr. Q. maintaining that if the Petitiontr and finnily separated their l,olitical itilittente from. hills, the 2001. ti-vent' sbo"1t1 h 0 withdrawn. Witness had no intention of de veting an hostile message to Mr. Quin from the Petitioner, as in his opinion, as well as that of Mr. Mannsell and Mr. D. O'Grady, no promise was absolutely broken by Mr. Q., althoufshe had be' staved unkindly and u n h a ndsom e ly totlie Petitioner. Mannsell and Mr. D. O'Grady also concurred With witness in thinking that Petitioner shou ld reject Mr. Q u i n ' s o ff er , whi c h was r ejected ac cordingly. On witness's return to Dublin, be re ceived a letter nom Mr. Maunsell, stating Oa t Dan. Gabhett had sent him an extract of a letter from Mr. Quits, stating as follows t—" Mr.Chadi may vote as he pleases, and it be chooses to vot e against me, I will not, on that account, depriv e him of the situation." This statement vett n f ill. i ti c t t;e ., s y s it o tt ( s ) a h t i l , y n y li e u ar n s e v o t; rn ceasetertnds did not know to have been written by Mr. Qu'n t:f'3ipnetaik", to him until the receipt in DubliO of the first (Ns", cnssion of this subject in that - House. The obj ect { • of Petitioner was• not, as witness has reasisn tt .) know, to obtain the 2001. a-year for himse lf ' . as the near r r c c! . a i ieonnt of at .11I)iets Petitioner;n e. but for th e re li c t o f hi s f at h er , w h o was theta Witnessan (ir c o s m v the El-quest of the Petitioner's mother , w h° was the sister of witness's father, he pletlpted h in . l .l self to assist P e titio n e r by hi s advice;and judg as far as he could--hence witness. was.urge" interpose so much in this transaction.--r-W ll9ess %- was positive that Mr. Good had called twieF 1 1 , 4 his house on the 22d of S e pt em b er . - Wittle!", ( ;4 , ' not, on his vi s it to Mr. Q u i n at Ad are , Limerick, in October, mention to that G e ll*,i'd• man that any Parliamenta r y i ov e st iga t iOn , take place upon this subject, nor did it oectff i ,.,l ' hint that it would. take that tarn. the uiog of this month,•witness understanding . 't h ., a . t n .would be called to the B a r, thought it right t4l:. :ii; prize Mr. Gnold,.as a brotherßirrister,. was highly probable he would be r e quired -10 ' 1) 4 r duce the letter fron t that G ent l enia n . whic h ."_, been already cited. To this commuoicati°:l, which was made. in w r iti ng , M r . G oo ld retu rn o i no answer, Witness had no comtnoniOti" Chief Baron O'Grady upon this,sUbject, b d t - 1 0. ply in his reply to a questi o n fr om his Lor d '' e jet :as to what was doing. This g us w ee wag mad ti e November last, and referred only to wh at neve r passing in the county of Li me ri c k. Witnes s Ch jef. had any consultation with or Itt Ice I • front n . w it 'Baron O'Grady, touching his commtinieat i° ':' ' •-•%s/ltn e Mr. Quin, on behalf of thPetitione r; e declared, that be had no other: view 1 0 s sn i l° -t d . written minute of th e conversat ion allu d e refu e with Mr. Quin than t o ma k e an ! a ccurat e re actuation of that Gentleman's views to oc id O r • limier and his father. Witness bad au derst a letter from Mr. Thomas Grady, that . 131t ess ie ,k- : son (the Petitioner) were restored to the c . wit-a. ship of the Peeve—[of thi s l e iter, which.t b e c oin, ness declared to be confidential, and 0! e the mencement of a voluminous correspoedeitce, • folloss M ing is an extract] : OlB. • " y dear Carew, " Bonlogoe, 20th Oc t' fun " God knows ; and so do I, that you ha your,batids.,....oo, I. that ward I committed to your tittelage. Your ptrse%': crfectiy _ e was manly, kind, and disinterested, and I am P ovt tiified with-the result': of em ir a d m iplittation: 1 , en whut part of -it most to admire—she coolness and in with which you led Q u in on , at - Ins -in t erview with yo t v frosts co q uetry to a f u n declaration 'of- his pas . sio c r o n bril , ery and corruptionT the simplicity with. which your ducted him to a written testimonial of that dr claration4re, the tact with which you hand'ed bins my letter , at yon "f„.;-c. Well interview-with - him at Mare; i t - wa s a-kind - of coin pliment i .wh ich you made him at the very n ick of_tl o 7], e l . 4 moment sooner 't would have beep too,.erly„ one 4 , " .. u ne pt rater 'twould hate been too late—hut yon seized the:,,;atisfi when he was glprif,ing himself upon his triumph, hint that the battle was o nly in its infancy. ~,e t tekel!z , "Poor Tom he' might have had an'overweeinn!tn. spirt!: fete the-'lool..alear,- but neither wants houou_r.nichid, though .he wants steadiness, which naturakileficl.erth, coo; lug want of judgnient, was abundantly Increa,e(l_,,:rirts,.r, fission of advice pOured in - upon him from' all ' , l:l ette r tr,o )3 "; the number of contradictory advisers. I. h! , a, him yesterday,. in which he pretty nearly I* -I P, I • sa ys, t yoit told me as to the proceedings below, " 451 ids mind 'bring unsatisfied at not hav io l , the %,;tllyd 1 10, ' ; out, he harl (here and in subsequent I ,l3 .e ( s ) ;; g int4 l ). t . printed in hales are underscored in time dn iake day written such a letter, as WO' as ks J et ity cessar fur Quin to call hint out; and the ,teat s in „i „ vice ! ''You had told me, I believe' with ~,t i o n and justice, that he had signified such-his in'c oo b o dy `" th ,t and yo:ir opinion to ine was, that if he did Su e i bing °cpre condvito him. To be.sure nobody would , s 031 „1 than sort must Lave been a measure rather expt.cflavi rated.—l said him, that I approved of h . ' s td o f 103 ,. i_ e ,. r the advice of his . friends iii the fir s ti o staoce , for 110 %: ing vindicated his own feelings in the sec ond to Od ir , l the sense of the country mi g ht he with , , to ol; to jurious treatment, it would - fall front him If Is` Aes ired 4 1 ,! i4 .1 1 1 to assert himself.—lf Quin let it drop there, ) " oria (W" do so to, but to she* A copy of his letter t' • for uo. u f hoped he kept) to all his friends. t. en ' Now, to tell you what progress have sec o, fit , flit , though I shall not call up . on you to promote .`drtiV part. of my warfare, I hope you, don't meot consolation of communicating confidentially . r , o , o r e e l 4. j i b it, or of expecting front you a con fi dential dinatit " of the sensation it shall produce on the oth er sal ' bc i to t • Channel." lid " Now, though revenge is sweet, yet so the c nice ter. I therefore last Friday enclosed a coll (lic t hat; gether with the observations and precedents 0 7 . y tO ge e ex ce ed, to my friend Quin, whims I should be. ow es, of , t IO hampered—arid this I did hunt tnen tionir" "Nlen )" F r cbO re ' that the advice proceeded from a leading aft" House—and I.pnt short note at the botwi a , ba ring t,b III %O C in the words following •: ta 01'0 l ose " I tleprecate and despise the idea o .01 her e 'h ,„0 often given you advice to your benefit, I " „f I advise you to restore my son to his otbcc , , _ fore time t ba , deprived him, by an appointment for fi fe , o t , • uro of pa o l espec _ of neat January—and to me by le, 3 I Stla so Wer you mean um take time ads ice I here give ). T f . / get 11° Av ice.'", same answer, b the of November---.orict,,d to u . a . u far the: i that day, I } shall presume that you 4e . J .a use a" .. s ulerc e And to prevent you all farther is ball be cur' t {o delay, no vadelle terra, no compionise., s ...ivice bee t, 4 ° by me as falling within the scope Of the "" „ tore A/ you.' ust be • -s ioe". "It mos , comes to this:—Either Toni tbe ro 5 re 111 0 the full plenitude of his place, or Qui" s oatuo TG. :mined beyond all redemption ; there " iVe a ° way. " You rs, be hail reee is 0 0' That was the fi rst intimation , before 6 .0 It any joie tit ion to bring , be question ( bough l dip rnent as a bleach of its 1)1'1% 61 '1; e : 4 81s, m r .Cirti o ' ll , , letter dated Boulogne, 27th Sep t • f t , o C sets. said he had the means., throni..ll the fious e . v of bringing the whole t witter betuti: Qo in Of ' 6 Conithons, with a view tit der Ile 411 not co nc ,t i_ o otlice of Custos Rondos urn. d i e t e " it possible that when Mr. Grad • wrot h. r S , t C he had received any letter trowel _tit _ t k and 23 subsequent to the letters of 01 . : 4 0 1 t 3 er, September. The firs; thos e of his ( - which were read) gave an 4 , r. 60 o p C. S.'o inter.iew with Mr: Q. I , : .. aL ai. „ ‘u no de 7.d whets Mr. Q said that he had I li his mind to appoint, Mr. R. Swim e coTor Y 1 Grady, t, 2001. a year to Mr, T. • a, P