The Sun. — London, England, 1819-08-02 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, JUCT 81. THE REV. DR. BRISTOW V. MR PARISHIONERS OF ST. THOMAS APOSTLE. The LORD CHANCELLOR gave his judgment in This case, and observed, that it was, no doubt, one. of considerable interest relative to the rights'of thc parties, considering them in the situation in which they . were placed. The original question before him was founded on a motion by the Rev. piaioriff„ Vicar of . the Parish, praying the Conn to,autheirize him to examine certain deeds %%bid) were in the custody of the defendants. This me . lion was made on the ground of the plaintiff iaitning his right, as Vicar. of the Parish, to en .30t:,7 the proceeds of a charitable-estate, founded in '. the reign of Edward the Third by a Mr. Champ to-:.;s, citizen and mercer, in London,, who devoted. a poition of it to' be paid to the Priest of St. Thomas, for saying so many masses for the soul. the deceased Founder of the Charity . After be,;ng regtilarly paid by the Trustees to the time of . the Reformation, by Henly the Eighth, the funds derweil to sopersiitioul purposes were ap p.ropriated to the Crow!' ; but there was a reser vation in this case in helia:f of this palish. The twat fire of 1666 destroyed the tenuments on the estate, among whets, ani it was rtifficHlt to say on what precise ground they, prior to that time, wet e situated. The parishi.ners ; claimed a right to .act as Trustees of the estate, contendiog that the intention of the Founder was to, make them applicable ; _but the Vicar chain:led them as be ing:his, in consequence of the intention expressed by the Founder. All that was therefore asked in the present stage of the : business was, to allow him an inspection of the deeds and muniments of the Charity, for the purpose of being enabled thence toaseertain‘on what each palely founded their claims. lie had minutely read over the bill and answers ;'and, in considering them, he was of opinion that the production of them was necessary to decide the question. He therefore gave his judgment accordingly. ROE v. ALDERMAN WOOD AND OTHERS. . Originally ibis was a motion, to set aside the . attachment issued against. Alderman Wuod and other's,. defendants in. this. cause, for not putting in : their Answers. The LORD CHANCELLOR, after liaving heard counsel' for anti against the motion (zriday, gave judgment this morning on it, by. ~,phich he set aside the attachment, but refused to 7 ,, give, the•defendants their costs, :as.-lie was .of opi rtip,n that they bad acted wrong in entering into an agreenient with the plaintiffi:iin the absence of the ,Learned Legal Adviser of. that Gentleman. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. HOME ClRCUlT.—Cneutsrow, JULY 30. OYSTER AND SOLE FISHERIES. THE KING F. ‘t:ILLIAM. strut)* azz.o OTHEES: t This was a case which excited agOnd, deal, Of. interest: It was au font. Lon. n - -1 don Fisherman, named . William Siitton c .;gdwarir Vreshwater, Arnold Fresh;v'atr, and Wi)l(am Sb per, for unlawfully - takingt,Wp,peck e i:of oysters, amid oyster brood, from the oyster layings of the Bornhani RiVe - i:Company, 0u,17111 of June last, by means of a certain inst.r.itnient called a trail, contrary to the form of.. the Stalute..made in: the 31st. of,.the King,',for,t_he bette.r.,p.r,o,tection of the sevecal oyster fisheries within,this kingdom.,. The prosecutio,o,,svascontlucttd,at the in!tcirtre of theliiirnhatnpystes, Compalty. ? ...by.Vr. ,GIAR.;• NEY, Mr. ANDRE W S, and Mr. Bapptttqx ,and the defence at the instance of corporation / of the City of London, 'by ihe Cor.lstON §EIiiBANTi BOLI.AND, JESS6P4. • Time object of this 'proceeding eirli'to deter mine the right of the LondonFisliernien for soles upon the private oyster grounds of the prosecutors, it being alleged, that the.operatioti of trailing was injurious to, the _young oyster] and oyster spat, the trail being .an instrument with a good deal, of iron, work,, made for : tbd purpose of Trigging aloug,t4botionvof the sea; „amiT.catching ‘ sores,,and, thereby. destroying, at the same time, es :was alleged," a great,.nmiantity of yoling .oysters, whielt wqtild crtislied by the ,)ykight of, the inac.bine.. It was proved' in Oki case, that the defendants, on the 17th of June last, weresse.en trailing for soles in the b'urnhami River, and that thqy I),Otit trio pecks of young,oysters, 'and:O . nter,spat i . Which they threw overboard, .again, reserving, only the soles., Tbere_was, nothing to shew, that the object of the defendants. was to take oysters ; on the con-, . • con trary,, the :whole ert4npe that, they come there exclusively for'lhe litupotte of catch ing soles ; 'but it was insisted, on the part of the prosecution,,,,that ,it .was not, ,necessary to . sliew 'that!the ,de,fendant,went.. for the .purpose, and . . „ with the intention of destroying oysters, in order to bring, thew within the penalties of the Act ot, Parliarnent for the , ,Vare fact of dragging their trauls over Atte oyster,grounds, without taking oysters, was quite sufficient., On the part pf the defendants it was urged, that, they, could not. .be convicted unless it was. clearly_shevvrk that they bad come, "for the pur-, pose of catching or destroying oysteri.” These ]otter .wordewtre introduced _expressly into the A.ct :Parliament, and 81 all . the evidence nega-, o tivecl any such purpose, the 'defendants. were ens-, . acipl to an acquittal. Mr. Justice Pettu{, after consulting" with. Mr. 'Baron Gar,row, stated, . tha t , his. Learned Brother, and himself were clearly of cpinion, that the words, " for , the purpose" over-rode. ; the whole clause ; ,stkon which the _indictment .was founded.. As it. *appeared, therefore tlkat the defendants bad .not emote ftir,an.y other purpose, Oat, . that offishing for Toler, thsr not -he convicted upon this: Act , , of Parliament,of , the offence,now . ,imputed to bisLordsbip tbereforeditected an acquit-, tal i and the delendants were found—Not Guilty., DORSET, JULY '3O. Mr. Baron .GRAHAM and _Mr. Justice nos Tar rive() at DOrChcatei last night, and •Opetied the, _ _ _ This morning, at twelve o'clock, after attend= in k; Divine Service,. they Ircieeg#o to biojtic . si.. 0 0 - :l a Et` o ,if: f ilde 14 '9'auttes ,were:eaclod, two of nitich are Special .Tries. The greater pall of the rest were either undefended, referred , or of too- trifling a nature to be worihy notice. Indeed the proceedings of the day, although 11 of the causes were disposed of, would havebeen alto gether uninteresting, but for the following trial : DRAKE:V. VENAELES. • This was an action brought by the plaintiff, a shoe-maker.and keeper of Revel's turnpike-gate, at Buckland Newton, in this. county, against the defendant, the Ckrgyman.of that parish, for hav ing entered his house and burned two books. The defendant pleaded that he had a license from the plaintiff's wife so to do, and upon this issue was joined. Mr. C. P. WILLIAMS (with whom was Mr. ADAM) stated.the case to the Jury. In the course of his- observations be said, that in this case heavy damages were not -the object, but it was a most meritotious proceeding on the part of the plain tiff, in order to teach the defendant not to move b, yowl the line of his duty.. He as much respect ed religion as any man,. but he did .not like to see her tight laced and choked with. starch ;, she ought to he attendrd with cheerfulness," and our fettered with gloomy restraint. The defendant, ,was not to be justified in doing what he had so officiously done ; he had infringed upon the rights of an Englishman, and he mnst,..now take the con sequence.. The Learned CouTel, proceeded to state the circumstances ; the only witness called was the following , . Susanna Biles—l know the plaintiff.4..he is a shoemaker, and lives at Revel's Turnnike-gate,. in Iluckland Newton. Defendant. is the Clergy- man of the parish. I remember the defendant corning to the plaintiff's house in October last ; the plaintiff was not at home ; Mrs. Drake, the plaintiff's wife, and a lAlys. Lane, since dead, were there,; the defendant used .Many good words, and hoped they would keep the S a bbath ; that was the first thing said ; he looked round and saw three books on the dresser ; it was be tween four and five o'clock in the afternoon ; he said that two of the books were not fit to be pe• rased . ; the third was a good book ; never saw the family before ; he had a second book in his hand about ten minutes, and put it down on the ' table ;, be asked. Mrs. Drake if Ire might burn the books (the two booki); before .he burnt them, he said to Mrs. Drake, will you permit 'tne . to burn the booksi", first she said sbe ha d given' them to a friend. Mr. Venables then said, he would_give her friend a good book, and her also,, if she,,Would permit him to burn them. Mrs. Drake said, it was .a matter of . indifference, she had rather have a good book ; that is all I recol lect"; he broke then) tip, and put them in. the fire ; he did not burn the covers ; I can't.swear that these are the covers.; Drake did not come while Mr. Venables was there; Mr; Venables went away before I did. • Cross-e x amined--I never saw a gentleman in my life behave' with' More propriety than Mr. V. ; • :there was nothing of arrogance : on his ',.eang away, Mra. Drake; thanked Mr. V. and said she should call for the good book. Mr. Serj!ant, Veit., On the part of the &ten. observed, that in these .days there was no such thing as a medium in religion : a . man who had mote of religion than his neighbour was a methodist s and a man Who had less than his neighbour was a - reprobate. Mr. Williams, what ever might have been his instructions, bad proved no single thing,excerthe mere plain fact ; and, looking at the motives of the act, there was ,nothiag, to jostify.the atrong observations which had been made-at the 'opening ; he would say that the defendant, had . done nodiing.mOretito wits( iwai,the duty of every Clergyman, in the courttry, :namely, that ' of ' ascertaining that the persous•comraitted to his charge were instincted in.the 'course of life they, ought tea adopt. He did noi:blaMe the plaintiff, he was not the means of bringing this -action, it' was somehddy the back ground- who bad" been instrnmen!al in put. tiitg forWar4 conception by Whotait could be brought, hutit Must have been brought from the Unworthy motive of detitroy,iug, Mr. yinablee character; and of making 'him flitasy ; tvt~y did tiot •Ali.: Drake . go to. Mr. Veta,bles if he felt himself injur e d, to Call minis him to make com pensation ? ,b4t,,Austead.of that, the first that Mr l o; , etiAles heats of, it is a writ,. ,1V is this then a celPectahle'aCtion.? and why was one man to call another a met hodistbecaose he happened to more religious than himself ? Here was a person just come into the parish, and it . was ,the duty of the clergyman to find out in their hunmble cottage . the books they were in the habit 'of readiug. Sedition was every where prowling 'abroad, arid assitilitig her prey,, through the me.. tliom of, immorality, in.everyplace from the pa.. 'laere to the cottage, and was a clergyman, in his ,attempt te, check thegrowth of these curses to society', always to move with caution, and with in Attorney or Counsel at his elboiv ? Heavy la mages.yvere not the object; he therefore trusted,. in case the Jury were not of opinion that the jus tification was sufficient, that they would give the . smallest Measure of damages possible, The wife herielt, the Jury would recollect, had said , she had . given the books to a friend, which sheaved ' tliat ,she felt herself to have an authority over' things of that description. He would only fur ther observe, that had he himself been there, he: should have been the first to put within the bars . Of the grate an amorous poem or au invidious novel. , Mr, Baron ORAHAM, in .summing up, observed, it war.an old saying, *that' the cooler should not go beyond Ma last, which . hewas fearful had been the case inibiinstance With the defendant. No tamely suffer his house to be ransacked by a.clergymau, nor, if hecould help . `by' his Wife.: 'fbeClergytnan, bad gone a little' 'too fir, hid the s mallest damages . would suffice, and more particularly as the, shoemaker himself' • Was not the person really concerned. • The Jury. retuned _a verdict for the plaintiff--, Damages, One Farthing—which, as there was a justification, carries costs. On the Crown bide, there are twenty-two pri-, s,oners, but the charges against' them are of a very tr ifli ng nature. The Assizes are expected to be over at an early 'our on Saturday. POLICE INII;ti!r_;ENICE. DO VV,STRE DErapIDATTONs AT WEST-,eND rsta.—Satorday being the day for the re-examination of the,per snos apprehended at West-end Fair, on suspicion of,being concerned in the ateocio,As outrages com mitted there on Monday and Tuesday, the office was crowded with persons who had been plun dered and ill used. The prisoners, 29 in number, were brought up handcuffed and. chained together, and werefollowed by a large concourse of people. T. Smith, keeper of a drinking-booth at the lair, which was stated by the officers to have been the grand rendezvous of the thieves, and the place of deposit for their booty, appeared on a summons by order -of • the Magistrate. A box, containing silk handkerchiefs, 2 black leather pocket-bonks; and a quantity of women's 'apparel, was' found in his booth. , • , . • The Magistrate (Mr. litc . F.o told this man, that, from the evidefice alre,idy given, there was reason to believe he was a receiver of stolen goods, and if proof could:be obtained,.he should Assuredly be committed to Newgate. Smith : de• . nied the imputation, and said that be was ,pot aware that his booth was resorted to by thieves. The handkerchiefs had been left , with him ,as,se entity for liquor, •aod ,he remainder of the pro perty belonged to him and his female servant. — Most of the plisoners having;treennapprehended in or near Smith's booth, and those that were , pursued having, it was said, taken refuge there, .111 r., Hicks declared, with much warmth, that he was determined to strike at the root of, ,the . evil,. mind remanded Smith. Smith acknowledged that he had no licence to sell liquor, and Mr. 'Hicks expressed a hope that he . would tre.proceeded against by the Excise.—One of the prisoners, named Cassidy, who bad been before identified, was folly committed. Lovell was recogniied by Mr. liddington, law-stationer, who stated, that as he was leaving the fair, on Tuesday night, he was attacked by a gang of. about,s9, with theprisooer at their head. He was the first to knock his hat off, and he was then knocked down, and beat about the head until he was senseless, ...and robbed of his" wateh,silVersouff-box,andmoney. At the first on set, the witness, knocked down Lovell, and a cry of " Stall him, cut his b —y throat !" was ;mine diately raised. Lovell was folly- committed for , trial on the capital charge. His father, who hr , petted to be present, was also recogo)zed as being in Smith's booth at the time of the robbery, and was examined and remanded. Another prisoner,: ,named Fletcher, was, examined and Temanded, having been identified by a young . Geqtieroan ,as the leader of a ga'ng by whom he r ,was assaulted' and robbed. , The following were also remAndd„' viz.—Burlie,•Brookes,, Whitaker,• mod , Hanst;d... Hinds, ,Talbot„ Goldsluith,,Stainea,Amtl were fully committed, charged, with strocioms assaults,-with intent 'to Coninat felPhy. The re-. mainder, with.the exception of two boyt e were ordered to be detained. for the ,purpose of 4ei v g identified. Mr, Hicks t in the,course of the .e - amination, repeatediy expreised his detertniita tion to do all •in ' his power 'to adopt niers , for .puttingdown: the fair,altogether, ••Should he be assisted by _the otheriNkagiatratesof the, county, i r e would prevent any drinkitig booths from being erected ; and the public might depOhd ou it, that every rnertn : should 'be, taken to avoid a repeti tion of, the disgracefal,, apd outrageous ; proceed ings which,,harl .beets so much the • subject of at tention during the lashoweeks: ]'HUMAN MOTHER From the pronildit tide and praiseworthy exestiows 0 e th e Chnrch•wardens,' Overseers', and - others of the parish of Lanilieth, the itinnariiral Maher' of the infant Which was found (providentially in time to save its‘iite) in a filthy ditch behind the garden of .Mrs- Snell, at No• day night, the 24th silt., has been discovered. A reward 'of 201, was promptly offered. by.thepa rish for the discovery or apprehension of the wo man, and she was found,on Frid a y evening last at 'herinOther's, who , resides . at I\:lert i ngton , from wbence . she was taken to the, WolkhOuie at LaMbetb, where the 'elrilti . is; : and on Saturday she was' taken to Pnionhall, wher t ehei• conduct , underwent a long inVestigation befOre Mr. :Allen. Mrs. Osborne, of No:s . 4, - C arlisle -place, Lambeth, stated, that on T hursday, the Bth of JulY last, - the prisOner, Whose name is Sarah - Ostnant, called at her house and hired a lodging, stating, that,she was in the family-way, that her'huiband Was at yea,' and thavher mother would attend her dindicg . her laying-in, which she expected would take place in a Month. The prisoner consulted Mrs'. Osborne respecting medical assistance during her cOnfineinent, and it WAS settled that Mr. Cooke, a Gentleman in the neighbourhood, should atteoil her ; and oti Tuesday morning',; .Itily 13, the pri soner was delivered of ;I wale child. which Mrs. Osborne received and dressed ; it ;vas a flue healthy child, and Mrs. Osborne saidibe had often dressed: it, during the time it remained' at her house.--4-' On Saturday the 24th ult., about dusk, the pri soner left Mrs. OsbOine's bowie, taking the child. with her, and said . she Was going to take it to a nurse, and thai'alle would call on her return fOr, the purpose of taking away her trupk, which she did, and Mrs. Osborne did not see the nrisbuir! after until Friday evening last, when she disco vered her it her mother's, !ti Mrs. Osborn Said;'slieh had seen the child which was found the and which - is now in Lambeth work-houte, and identified it 'as' the child of Sarah Umk . ia. the prisoner, which she knew from having 'often' dressed it,'and a cap was produced which was on the child-when taken out of the ditch, which Mrs. Osblit'ife4ls4l) prOvedshe'had pnt . on the child the., day . it was taken away. 'When the MagiStratc:: asked the . prisoner what she had to say, she con= (eased she had thrown the child into the ditch, but: denied having tied the tape abont ita neck, ay tound when it was discovered. She excused hrr barbarous conduct by saying she was in a state of phrensy at the time,. having been neglected by the Lather of the child, whose name and address she gave. The . prisoner is' a young woman, anti declared there was no peeson concerned with - her in the attempt to destroy the child but there are` strong suspicions tha t this is Untrue. She : was committed 'to gna t and every possible means Inive been adopter( for the diicovery of hericeurnidicei'. , Proni date t.ONDo' • ; I' MY , [This Gazette notifies, that t hePrince Regent has letters patrnt to ,be issued for granting the u !' ai; ronet tu Lient.-COlonet Alexander Allen, of tlfrEast i n Company's sertice ; that he lias'appointed Mr. dames 13, Consul fur Ha • •at Hanover Gibraltar; and permitted t;aplain the shna Crosse, of the 36th regiment, to accept and we B r „ insignia of the Spanish Order of Sot „Fernando. 0 0 a "i flounces the return of Sir R. Gifford, as Member of Parlifunent for Eyre •of Mr. M. Casberd, for Nlilburne.port ; and Sir W. R ae, ' fur Pittenweem, &e.J direzoato War- (Vce, Ju 50. tst Regiment Life Guards— i Cornet ly F.. K. L. Bayard , - fr l t • half-pay 3d Dragoon Guards, to be Cornet and Sub-);;,, tenant, vice' T. Walsh, who exchanges, receiving the 14 a" fe ß rence. . half* 4th egiment Dragoon Guards--Cornet .1. Hunter, fro m pay 6th Dragoons, to b e Corn e t, v i ce G. Stevenson , s% exchanges. iron' 18th Regiment Light Dragoons—Captain S. O'Grady , ro pi half-pay 7th Light Dragoons, to be Captain of a ' A j,r; vice C. Blackett, who exchanges,-receiving . on i lY the of ..enre between the full-pay o f caval r y a n d the full•P a v infantry. the 5901 4th Regiment Foot—Lieut. F. P. Robinscn. from Foot, to be Lieutenant, r ice Matthews , who. yxchaosl.-,tiii 10th Ditto—Lieut..-Coloirel M. Stewart, from • lialf-P B l ° n inth 103 d Foot, to be Lieutenant- Colon e l, vice Ttavets,ao„ - i s ti an Inspecting Field Officer of Militia in the la" Islands. • t f •,l 16th Ditto—Capt. Clements, ironi half-pay list eta' be Captain of a Company; vice J. Gallwey, who exchatir Deceiving the dierence. I 'loth Ditto- , .Gent: ff Cadet . E. C.• Mathias, front the Roy, 3 si litany College, to by Ensign, without purch a se, rice „, wt • " appointt;d to' fire Ist Ceylon Regiment. tf 29th Ditto---Lieutenant W. Gilbert, from half.pay66o',',lo to be Arijittant and Lieuten a nt, v i ce V es i e , who c cs '' the Adjutancy only.• ' " • • • - 35th Ditto—Ensign H. W. S. Nixon,to be Lieutenant,ithw ; • out purchase, Eustace, deceased. • ' 434 Ditto—Lieutenant J. FinlaY, from half-pay of the D:f e meat, to he Lieutenant, vice I,,Laior, who exchange') ceiving the difference. ••:• • - 47th Ditto . --Gent. Cadet G. Rooke, frOm the Royal MiiitarL College, to be Ensign, without purchase, vice LuttrellAirg rooted. v a ot, 55tk Ditto—Lieutenant•J. Ralston. fromlhalf-pay 64th • - to be Lieutenant, vice E. H. Adams, wh o exchanges, „ • •ceiving the difference. • 58th Ditto—Lieutenant A. Beverhoudt, from half-par 63 . (1 Foot, to ha Lieutenant, vice H. Alceick, who exchs a g"' receiving the difference. • ' 1 .,.' 00 r 59th Ditto—Lientenatit W. M. Matthews, f rom the 4th ••• to be Lieutenant; viceltuhinsou, who exchanges. ;, d c 65th Ditto—To be Ensigns, without purch ase —Gent. ; a ,,,e W. S. Wood, Irma the Royal 'Milit ar y C o lle ge , vice """:ia house, promoted; Germ. Cadet G. M. Bowen, from the WI Military College. rice Lyntl; promoted. • 734 Ditto—Lieut. T. Wright, to be Captain of a ComPil: without purchase, vice Glenhohne, deceased; Emig? Butler, to br'Liebtenant, vice Wright,' T o tie EaPIAli: without purchase—J. Comte, Gent. vice Butler; Ge i - c a •• Cadet P.-O'Brien, front the Royal Military College, ' Trydell, deceased. . 75th Ditto—Lieut. S. \V. Lacy, from half-pay 8/d Foot, t';.171:, Lieutenant, vice G. It. Mountaiu, who e xchanges, rc c el. in,, ,, the difference. . 834 Ditto—Ensign E. Nihell to be Lieutenant without Purim chase, vice Tryilell,. promoted in the id Ceylon ie giele u ',„ Gent. Cadet F.Nrnith, front the Royal Military Coiner be 'Ensign, rice Niltelf. e lee 84th Ditto—Captain E. Nichol tobe Major, by purchase , - Schuyler, who retires; Lieut. R Cruise, to be Captain al, Company,' by•purchtese, vice Nichol ; Ensign 'n Frederic to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Cruise i Hon. C. 1 30 4 to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Frederick.' • 86th Ditto--Gent. Cadet J.•lll`.trityre L frons th e 16 T al.11filiti l • College, to be 'Ensign, without purchase, vice 110 1141 ! . - promoted. • • _ ;• • • - 91st Ditto—Lietitenant C. Berkeley, from half-pay 2d r " to•be Lieutenatitiiviee- , ltt Cdnipbellywhu ea - Changes. , be Rifle Brigade—First Lieutenant 0. Felix, from half-paY `1,,, - , Reginteritytó be First - Lieutenant, vice H. Llewelyns w- • exchanges receiving the difference. , Jr Ceylon Regiment—Captain G. Stace", 'from half-pa/ 4 ‘ , 1/3 . Ceylun „Regiment, 'to he Captain of a Co m pany, **jc t. Secluno, who exchanges. 4'o. 'robe Second:Lieutenants, withoutlstirehaseEnsign Lewis, from the 19th Foot,: .vice Henderson, deciased ; • Tage, Gent. vice,Newmar, deceased. ' • • ' Ditto—. Lieut. B. Tryilell,. from the 834 F oo t,. to be Car thin of a CoMparty, without purchase, vice Smith, d e cease d ! td Lieut, H. W-Nieritb to be. lat Lieutenant'withoUt P ur chase, vice Gill, deceased Gent. Cadet C. Warbutt oof from thaltoyal Military College, to be tit Li eu t ena nt, vrilb' out purchase, vice Smith. • ha STkrio.—Coignel Robert TraVers; from' the 19tit Foot, to Inspecting Field Officer of.,llilitiat iu the United StateC" the lonian Islands,. vice Jamei Maith;rid; olio retires ull °ll • ; uf the load Foot;. World tcoeifeltGint.'to , ha,* Barrack-master to the Forces, vice Gavin Ralston, decea se , a amyl T A e Ferary.—Deputylnipector ofklustiitarlsj. Strali from half-pay; to he Deputy Inspector of Hospitals, vicc •Bigger, M.-13, who 'retires • upon hall-Pay ;' J, Cbitisbc f " Gi.Ait. to be Hospitaist= „ t2 ..... % the Forces. : . . BANKRUPTCIES .SUPERSEPAD. T. Goode Hinckley, Leicestershire, hosier." S. Young, Manchester, cotton-,spinner. , BANKRUPTS. J. Taylor,. Marshfield, Gloucestershire, tnealman., •A l rgast -1 " 14, and Sept. 11, at twelve,, at the Connuereiat Rooms, Bristol.. • •Atturnies, Mr. G. Burfoot, , Walks, Inner-Temple; and Mr- T. netting, Chippiog S u ' bitry, Gloucestershire. • S. sli ter, Eiuswortlk„ Southampton, rope and. sail-11 14 ill August 7, 14, and Sept. 11, at twelve, at Guildhall. l' 1 " -t o ruies:,, Messrs . . Stratton and Co..4l,Shoreditch. - "- H. It. Ashby, Budge-row, Cannon-street, copper-plate a l .letterpress printer, August 7. I 7;and Sept. I t, at two at Guildhall. Attorney, Mr. Dalton, Union,street • RisbeP s* . • gate-strsiet. ".. /If/ H. Aarkrratlcastte, Yorkshire, butcher, AttgOst 6, at engust 7, and Sept. I at eleven, at the Angel-inn, T e 4' • caster. :Attordei, Messrs. Fisher and Co.; Hulborn. W. Broomfield, sem, and W. Brom - afield,. jun.„"Walsvarif Surrey, bricklayers, August 7, 14, and-Sept. 1 t, at e lere" ,at Guildhall.. • Attu' nies, Messrs. Quallett and. Cu., W S. pest-row, Dockhead. J. Hartlen Red Gate-court. Minories, 'merchant, IVO , " . „ 14, Sept. 11, at twelve, at Guildhall. Attornics, Mee s 'T 'Hord and Co:, Kin's-Bench-Walks, Temple. , at A. M`Nair, Abchurch-lane,!. merchant, August. 7, • twelve, - and Sept. 11, at one, at Guildhall. Atteruie" Messrs. Tomlinsons aud,Co., Copthall-court. - • [Dividends, &c. to-morrow.) scurcti SEQUESTRATIONS. July 4 6, George Martin, merchant and us'ealsellefaiSe * Eo riughurn, by Dundee—Creditors meet in Morren's Ta. r ! / t there, 10th and alst August, at 12. • • r —Joseph Stella Manfredi and Co. dyers, G u ertn, l W 4 h Glasgow—Creditors meet in'the Claremont Tavern ther e, r and .25d August, at 12. t • EXAMINATIONS.DIvIDENDS, &C. Richard grocer, Maybolei to be re-examin e] /111 the Sheriff Clerk's Office, Ayr, 2d August, at- 14. Todd, Stuntridge. and Co. printers. Leven. Printfield.`3 merchants, Glasgew,,to be examined in the Sheri ff-O ° F l4, Office there, nth and 23d August, at 11. . .4! nsei quorgejsri le ,Short idge, printer at Daysluslm. AO chant, Glasgow, to he examined in the Sheriff-Clerk's On , there, 10th and 514th August, at 11. 7 ' Charles Jameson and Sons, merchants, Inverness, to be ; le mined in the Sheriff-Clerks office there,, 9111 and ititb° 'gust, at'l. A • tb• James Don, manufacturer, Dundee, to he,examine. 1 0.. Sheriff Court-room, Forfar, sth and 20tb August, at 12 -, do John Broadlovt. merchant, Leith, to :be,examined ,ll ,, t 'a, Sheriff Clerk's Office, Edinburgh, tith and 20th August , 7( 1 - 0 CrediCreditors,of , Robert:Campbell and Cm Glasgow, to 1 0 claims with James MacQuet 0, Tontine Buildings ther e, Trustee-. . Creditors of Alex. Mitchell, faruTer and eattle•tlesls; Fiddeslieg of Foveran, will receive a. dividend from , 1-I,llgllV4lil, advocate, Aberdeen, 311 September. 'i r . •Creditors of. James Nliiehell, tanner, St. Ninias. w e ' fite r, (-rive dividend, 41 the office of Charles Clll7Stie) W Stirling, 2?tlt A. (100 . State* of t lie affair* ?f James Witttf fiestietv Aberdeen. at the office of AnAltew Rubertsou, 'advocate tliere•-"`' ' • DIED. On Saturday, the.3l3t ult. at itis..bouie f at Wands lpO t I, Mr. hint Nl'Andrew, of Lower Thames-street, in the 67 year-of •hii nge. LONDON: by J. B. CARSTAIKS, of Nu. 429, tv G rei r. O s rmood-street, Queen-square,; a„nd pplAiAlled bN "4' jt o4 SCRIPPS; of No. 7, South 'NI olton-gtreet,, at J r",t i tats 1 te. Striand whkrr f AArkltiseluctita, * l ' Lrttuts, &9. (pust-paid) must be aid:med. f !~ ``.: 11 S 4 ; ,~~~t N:?I t • P rij -.gs hi, 1 kir; b tßri . I _*e t e ,, k iii 11'111 t 4v t 4,1 kS. C u ,• eat i