The Sun. — London, England, 1819-07-23 00:00:00

ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. B E It KS II I It E. ABINGDON, MONDAY, JULY 19.---This mnrning the Oxford Circuit commenced at this place. Mr, Justice HoLttoYD and Mr. Justice - RICHAPDSUN entered the town at 11 o'clock, and opened the _Cominission. They soon afterwards went to Church, accompanied by the Sheriff, JOHN SAW I'i-sit, Em., with the usual formalities.—On their return, Mr. Justice RICHAIMSON took his seat in the Crown Court, and Nlr. 3tistiCe 1101, ROY I) presided at Nisi Pt ius. The calendar con tains tie names of 35 prisoners—an unusual num ber ; Imr the greater part of them are labourers, eharg.ed with sheep stealing.. No case of any ge net al interest occurred on the Civil side to-day. TUESDAY, JULY 20. SEDUCTION. JOHN!UMBER v. TIMOTHY TOW SEND. This was an action brought by the plaintiff againit the defend.-int, to recover a compensation dama,ges for the ii,jury which the former had gustdined by being deprived of the services of Mary Eimber, his daughter, - whom it WAS aNeged the rtelendaut had seduced. The defendAt pl.•aded Not whereupon issue was joined. Mr. Sit E R D opened the pleadings ; and Mr. J tzv is addressed the Jury on the part of the plain ti;}. The Learned Counsel said, that the plaintiff was a respectable tattier, residing at Deitch worth, in the county of lierks, and possessing landed operty to the amount of 30001. or 40001. The ridendata was also is respectable fernier, residing • s i in the pat ish of Hampton, in the county Oxford. The plaintiff had a wife and six chit- . riven, three daughters and three sons ; the eldest daughter was married to Mr. Castle, a respect-. able farmer at Grove ; Miss Mary Kinaber was the second daughter ; she had acted as dairy-maid to her father, and was about 26 years of age,—ln the month of September, 16'15, she was on a visit toner cousin, Mr. lt.Butler, of Minster Lorell,ox fordshire, and, in company with him, her-sister,and whet ft leads, she, on the 20th of that month, met •the defendant at Which wood-forest fair, which is generally attended by most respectable people. She was not acquainted with him, but she lied seen him once before ; he was also about 26 years of age, •and be insisted nr;on walking borne with her to Mr. Malta's, a distance of four miles. On the road he expressed a wish to 'pay his addresies to her, and obtained her consent to receive a visit from him at her father's house the following Sunday week. lie came on that day, a marriage ,vas agreed upon, and he continued his visits about Juice in every three weeks. Denchwurth was abOnt 10 miles from Weald, and the defendant sometimes came on horseback and sometimes on foot ; he was always entertained by the plaintiff and his wife, and received as the intended husband of Mary Kimber. After some visits, the defer. dant behaved in a very improper manner to her, but she resisted his entreaties with ihe most in dignant feelings. He requested forgiveness, and promised not to repeat such actions ; she fort; ve hot he ceased to visit her front that time•— About Christmas, 1816, Miss Klaiber was with a Mr. and. Miss Harris, spending a day or two'wijh a Mrs. Clinch, at Weald. On die evening of tbrir arrival the • defendant came in, and he, with Miss Kircher and,Aliss Harris, .being left in the room together, Miss Harris, with reference to his calling at Mrs. Clinch's, es it was supposed for the pur pose. of seeing Miss liimber, observed to ,him, " Now, Townsend, you have been to see Miss Kimber once, and we.will now have it in black And white, as, if you deceive her again, she shall have part of your fortune." •- The defendant re. plied, c",fhere is no occasion for that, I always intended to have her." And, in a_ subsequent conversation, he told Miss Kimher that he wished and, intended, to s'tsit her again.; but she refilled to receive him, saying,, he. had. .better stay away, unless cold() behave as he ought to do, and in tended to.marry her, lie then promised toil() so, and it Nes, agreed between them that the court. ship should be renewed. And,.at ..the request :of the dele.mlant, Miss Kinaber . with, her .friends snipped that evening at the house of the.defen. dant . fat her. About..a month afterwards, the defentlat4 went to Denehwurth ; .but, as Mis,s Firnber was.poorly,she .did nut sere much of three.weeks he went again, and continued . his visits until the middle of. Mey,.1817. when, un tort unetely,. he. accomplished his purposes, and Nis*. Kimber fell, a sacrifice to lilt, artifices.. In the course, however, of his latter visits, helold her sister, Martha Kimber, to get ready to be ht idemaid, fur the wedding. would take place as ()an ao Mary ,wins ready, and he should .wish her to spend. a week with Mary at first : ire also told her tiny Jolnt Clinch se-its to give Mary away.--. On the Bth of June he viiiied Miss Kimber again, end afterwards, without assigning, any cause, : to. tay . left and neglected her. About six Weeks After the last meeting, she wrote to him to knoW tvl,y he did not call in see her; but he sent no rep:y. She then addressed another lever to him, Baying she was with child, end begzint: him to marry her. That letter produced the following rel;ly~ " August 17, 1817. • " I received your letter permit me to send you these few lines as a testimony of my tmedience to you, as 'tis the first time of writing to your honoured self, I hope you will. he on the pardoning side. I teecived your's of the 16th instant, and was surprised lam sorry to say I cannot comply with your request : it is out of my power at prcasant, fur age and youth cannot agrer in our opinion (the Learned Counsel could not tell what this meant), and from that reason liberty is preferable to me. My opinion is. Out you think I go else where: brit I defy you, or any other person, to the contrary. I here state, therefore, 1 Lope you will not censure things of that hind upon your spirits, since agQ and youth cannot agree. I have had bad expreAions upon the subject, therefore I lin?e for tkr best ; the worst appears to take. place fast enough. !fhere will come that time, I hope, when affairs will turn up rar beyond expectation ; and if you sincerely wish to see me, will come; but I should rather not; it will add great unea aincss.on both sides, therefore I wish to be excused. What inure cats I say at prer.rsant, but to subscribe myself voirr most obedient ? I hope you will attend to your Liitionkr9 in re spect of spelling.' • Miss Kimber answered this letter, and stated, -that she moch wished to see him, : but he took no notice of it ; and she therefore requested her sis tel• Martha to call upon him, which she did in Sept. 1517, in her %% NI)? from her cousin's. She thtn !oh: h:rn, her sister diary wished much 10 ace him; he replies, ". Betwixt two stools ianist effirvie In the groupd." • Ahr:laa kimber then ob served, " You mast be a pretty sort of a roan to go to see two girls." The defendant said, "It is too late to talk about that now, bu . t . I will come and sec your sister." This conversation took place on Saturday; and Miss Kimber, feel ing the situation she was in, and the defendant not calling upon her, went the following Tues day, accompanied by her sister Martha, within a mile of his house, awl sent a note - to him, saying she much wished to speak to him. He came - to them in the road, and Miss Kimber asked him why lie left tier, an') the reason lie did not tell her of his intention. lie replied, that he did not intend to -leave her nntil weeks after he last saw her, but that he did not know what to do, for he had been to see anotlrm- girl, and he believed she was in the family way also ; but he refused to tell her name. Ile afterwards said, he hoped the other girl was not in the family way, as it would be a - disgrace to leave a gill iu such a state, and lie should not then know : what to do ; but if both were in the family way, he thought he could not marry either, as lie should not like to marry one and leave the other. Nothing further happened till the 25th of Octo ber, 1817. when Miss Kimber received tire col. lowing letter, from hint :-- " Kind Liss,-1 thought proper to svelte to you, and from the expiration of time, and the news I hear stated, I wish to set your father, to proceed on tine bilsiness, for , I think it is time. I shall be at Farris don Fair on ll'ensday neat, !Pitney on Thursday, and Burford on Saturday. 'Then-dove, if your father will see me, 1 will behave mv.elf as well as possible it lay in ply power, and I hope he will likewise. You and riot - father think I used you ill, and I think of your hi ther the same. 1 hope you and all the family a.e in good health, as I am at prcasant. William Clinch brought the news from Harney, and soon I heard of it; but. I !leg In keep it secret. I hope you will return me answer by Mr. Thomas Clinch. I beg to remain your most o b e di e nt," Miss Klaiber answered this letter by saying, her father .would meet him at Witney on the 'Ulnas ti-ay ; and her father, accompanied by his nephew, :%.Ir. Butler, did meet him ; when the defendant proposed to marry her, upon his gi \lnf.; her 8001. saying he was, or shook' be, worth double that sum himself. The plaintiff told him, he would give him horses or sheep, or he would give him landed security; but Ire would not contiae him self to 8001. as after his death he should give his children all his property equally between them, and he would not for the sake of one injure the others; and that lie would rather the defendant had run him through with a knife, than have de bauched Iris daughter. The defendant said, that he- had nothing to say against the plaintiff's daughter, as she was a very good young woman. Nothing was agreed on at this rueetin ; but in November the defendant called on Miss Nimber, tit her lather's house, anti said he was then very low in spirits, haVing 'buried his father, but that it should soon be odds'ai And it was time it was °tided (meaning " settled," or that he would soon marry :he daughter of the plaintiff). also stated, that his father had bad a very great regard -for her, and had, in conteinpirtidn of his, ri d ge with her, left 4iitn all his goods ; that his antic had left hid 10001 , and his uncle would leave him 20001., and that in a few days he would come and see her again. 1-le ttd :rot; however, do so ; and on the 11th Feb., 1818, Miss Kimber was Oeiivered of a male child. AbOut 7 weeks ftrrwai:(l4 the defendant went to see her and the child, and spent the whole day with her. No thing then passed as tothe marriage, in April she wrote hint a letter, and received the following re ply in July : • " Miss,-1 received your letter on tine Ath of April, and was surpri,ed at your father not giving nie au answer hiroS:2lf, without sending by Mr. Clinch the 'contents; lint such eon tentsare not what I wish; therefore I cannot, nor wrll not, cuter into them terms; and as for a child's share, I wish to know what that is. lam not 'ashamed to own what hare; and, by that reason, I am surprised at your father's offer. Soon after you, and I became acquainted, your father and I was walking one Sunday afternoon; tie was saying that he had lOU:it:Eel of land of his 'own, with paying a strut or two, which induced me to continue—our acquaintance as usually; and ray being led on by such fine Swills as theni, has brought it to what it really is; .and.asfor.a person to pre ,tend this thing or that thing 'when he knows to the contrary, he ought, 14 lout he whin: sin he 101;0, be ash annul lit lint sel I and for is person to lead another under such preteuces as them, never ought to tire. Yet, there are them in the world whicti talc great delight in leading 'YOuiig people into errors of that tlescriptipa i• but 1 will nescr, give yvartp:-stieb pre tences while lam able tin delendanysell. I wish notrbing but fair prziy;. yet, turning : all thiags aside, if yonr fattier will not comply vit.l) any request, I hope you and him will act us yo.o think proper, and as soon as i couvenient ; for I wish it settled roars woy,or other to each of our advantage. I hope you will return we au ansettras soon as convenient. From " Your artist obedient, • • • , • , . TIMOTIIY TOWNV.SEIND.. " I hope you antrall the family are in good health, as I at Jr/Truant." Miss Klaiber Still hoped nit 'the defendant would marry her till the munth'ot November last, when she heard that he was Married to Miss CoOke, who resided near Burford,"in Oxfurdshire. This ease would,:he, proved in evidence to the Jury; and it would then remain for them, under the,directious of the Learned Judge, to give 'such compensation in damages as they thought the plaiotilf,wacentitled to receiee.,. Mary Ktraber said, that,iBls she lived as dairy-,maid with her father. At IVlrichwood-Po. rest Fair she met the defendant ; he'said he wired to' pay his addresses to her, and to marry her. He visited her Several times, with the consent of her father and mother, his intention to marry her heiirg made known to them. On one °Coil:don, Li the course of those visits, he made some impro per advances to her, which size repulsed ; be then promised never to repeat such actions, but he dis continued his visits. At Christmas, 1816, s:e met him at Mts. Clinch's, when he renewed the court. ship. lie continued to visit her at her father's house till May, 1817, when, by holding out pro mises of a speedy marriage, he accomplished her seduction. On the Ilth of February, 1318, she was brought to bed of a boy; -the child was still living. The defendant afterwards renewed his promise of marriage, telling ' 4 l,er it should soon be odds'd ; hut in November last he Married Miss Cooke. The witness then proved the teeeipt of the several letters from the defendant. - On cross-examination, she said that . her father occupied a'great many acres of laud ; she could not tell how many were his own ; he kept several cows, and she,wal dairy-maid. Martha Kimber said, that sire was the second tiaught,r of the plaintiff. The defendant visited her sister Mary,with the knowledge and ASSelfit her father and mother, and declared that he in. tended to marry her. - He said to witness," Miss, do you take care to be ready as bride-maid; it is to be as soon as your sister is ready : John Clinch is to be the father," (meaning that be WaS to glee ' Ler sister ovay.) F lease then dWeti to visit her - he came but once afterwards. At Christmas, 1816, they met at Mrs. Clinch's, and the defendant then renewed his visits at her foither's house, At the request of her sister, she went to the defendant in the month of September, 1817, to beg he would call upon her, when he slid, he was afraid there was another girl in the family way with him ; and if there was, he would have neither of them, be cause it would leave one in disgrace, and hQ could not forgive himself. Her sister was brought to bed in February, 1818, and the child was still living. In November last the defendant married Miss Cooke. Richard Butler, nephew of the plaintiff, de posed, that in October, 1817, he was present at a meeting between the plaintiff and defendant at Witney. On his entering the room, the defend ant, alluding to a treaty of marriage between him and Miss Kimber, addressed him in these words: " Your uncle and 1 cannot agree. I ask hint SOK. and he thinks that too much. I think 8001. a fair sum, because I expect to be worth double that stint myself." The plaintiff said, he would give hint holies or sheep, or land security, but that he would not confine hiMself 800; ; he would give his daughter Mary a chit's share. •The defendant then said, "B— you and your daughter too." The - plaintiff was io a great rage, and the WitinS interposed to prevent any violence bet ween them. Piai (It ff said to defend .1 n t " Thee blotch my danghter ! I'd sooner thee simuldst run a knife through my hotly than blotch my daugh ter." The defendant then said. " 1 did not b-- you and your daughter too." Witness said, " Yes, you did. I must contradict you." He replied, "If 1 did, lam sorry for it. I have nothing to say against the young woman; she is a very good kind of girl." On cross-examination, the witness said, be did not recollect that his uncle said to the defendant that he would ruin him. Mr. TAUNTON addressed the Jury on behalf of the defendant, lie -observed, that he and his Learned Friend (Mr. Shepherd) who was with him in this case, had given as little trouble as pos sible to the plaintiff's witnesses, and hi particular to the young woman who was the object of this action. The only questiOn he bad asked ..her re lated solely to the property and situation in iity of her father ; for, in the instructions Which be had received,. he bad been desired to steer clear of any observations that. might affect her future credit and welfare in the world.- 'I he present ac tion was of a very simple description ; it Wits to recover damages for the injury which the plaintiff had sustained by having lost the service 'of his 'llallgliter during her confinement; and the Jury would estimate %vhat.the amount of that injury was. It was a clear principle of - law, as well as au acknowledged rule of justice, that where a de- tendant had been'guilty,of an injury, he sho , ild not pay twice fen. it ; and, there:foie, iu this 'Case the Jury should Only include in their verdict the very precise damages to Which the plaint fl was entitled. This was not an action foi a breach of lirrinrise of marriage ; it was nofan tics inn brciught by the daughter ; it was an action in Which the daughter WAS stated to he the servant o f th e fa ther ; and the lay: declared, that if the 'slaughter be not at the time of seduction an inmate in the house of the father, no inch action can'be Main tained. Mr. Justice IfOtßorn said, except it he proVed that'she intended to rc..tirrn to her father's ser vice. Mr. TAUNTON admitted that thrs . goalifiestion was correct, and tharikeil Lis tbrdship stated it. It Strengtherie3 the argunient whiCh Poe had urged, inasMuch'as it showed that lOst'of ser= vice was the only ground of damages in actions like the present. lie repeated, that he had no Intention to cast any reflections opon the chat'ac ter nth] conduct of Miss Kiniber, but 'be wished the Jury to consider all the circumstances of this case in a 'calm and dispaiSionate manner. Jr ap peared that "the'parties met at a tair at Which- Woo;l-fOrest, in September, 1815. The:). Met accidentally, and the defendant paid 'ids 'ad ilreSses Miss Kimber on an honour,thie foot. 'She becanie dknleased with bii beha viour, and here their 'acquaintance was broken jiff. At Owist . tiias, 1816, Miss 'KiMber and tiersisterigartha went to Weald, in . 'where the defendant lived. It was stared, that they went to spend a day or two'with - Airs. Clinch, hitt it could not lie doubted that their object 'was, to reivew their intimacy with the defendant. They itipped, 'indeed, at the hotise of the defendant's father,and'from that time till May, 1817, when that hali'pened which'was the occasion of the pre. sent action being brought, the defendant conti nued to'viiit Miss Kimber. Let the Jury, then, loOk at the seduction in this case : what proof ryas there of an artfurgaining over of the young woniari in order to secure her affections ? It Was obvious that he was not the only 'guilty phrty.— Wbat were the ages of - these persons ? At the tittle in question she was 22; he was also'22, and living with his father, whose farm' be Managed. In their ages, then, they were upon an equality, and the passions Were as strong in "the one ss in the other. This ,was not the case of a man of 30 or 40 seducing an inexperienced girl of 15. Miss Kiinber had stated, that'Sbe'liad once repulsed the defendant for improper behaviour; she ought then, when she renewed her acquaint ance with him, to have been more upon her guard. And here (exclaimed the Learned Counsel) I must beg to 'say . a few Words with respect 'to the gene ral policy of actions of ibis sort. In my opinion they are not the best gttatds for female chastity. A young woman, in balancing whether she shall yield to the solicitatiOns of a man, or to'the gra tilicstion of her own passions, may say, "1 can either make him marry Me, and make me an ho nest woman, or I can make him pay liandsOme ly." The present is a' sort it `action which has multiplied upon us very greatly of late years ; not 'that !Inman nature is ;Vealter‘than it alivays has been, but because there is more artfulness in the conduct of ruing women. It had been said that the defendant, in this case, after he had accom plished his object, had abandoned the female. On the contrary, however, it was proved is; evidence, that he was willing to have lbar• vied, her s hot Jer father_ relust to ,come fors ward with such a fortune as he had induced she defendant to expect. This was efident from the • lettel•i, *bleb had been react, in one of vrl l--;et :'' defendant said, " Y out h an d age ca nnot ag rc- i i,it an expression ivhich the Learned Counsel °ll bst other side had affected not to un derstand. 0 ,0 was the sum whith the defe n d an t asked ll. o tie only 8001., not to be p a id i ntoredidtelY, bu t secured on the property of the plaintiff. T h i e n - ° did therefore, wo u ld rerneni b er , t h at t h e defet,"-i bo not wantonly cast aside this young wotton was willing to make the best reparalo" power for the injui yhe had done. WS was since dead, and lie bad married W o ' l - nc ei But the Jury would consider a ll t h e cheil msr : - led of the cas e , and not suff er themselycs CO !O "- away by the excess of their feelings. ' 6l Mr. Justice flobnovn summed up the case toll the Jury that they were called upon "), „Fi l o; . F he plaintiff a compens - ation in damages-for " l ' ie vA jury he bad sustained by losing his danght ers ,: d olt vice. , The action was not brought by the Y i vr woin?si ; her .-:•rorinti of action ,could b e ,1 0 1% vel breach of promise of rnarriagt!: only, to hel 3 '; o ot by other evidence than her own. They o'e r ,' 041 to take into consideralion any damage wh ica por e .' bad sustained, except in so far as it went hitter the feeling's of the plaintiff, and to tlia l . lll o his fortune, by having his d'augliter left ° "041 hands. There appeared no impugn!. colidlif 7- het the pars of the fa!lier and daughter, excel° , fi e g oing to see the detendaitt after the in . titllaCi ore br eked off. 13,:t the y udd take Ole ill 6ct of the cas e i n t o th e i r cons id er ation, and g i ve l s damages to the plaintiff us they thought he - entitled to receive. The Jury deliber a ted f or s'!ort on' A fit oei , delivered a verdict for the plai:itiff—Datuagti" WINCHESTER, Juur 2t. f 0 Yesterday Mr. Bar o n GIZAHANt and Mr , l i ds o c e Brt,T arrived here a b ou t two o'clock, an"' " e deti dining with the Very R ev . th e D ean , Pr ( l ec : i ot to open the Commission. This morning, Divine Service, both Courts entered upon th e siness of the A.,sizes. The calendar of prisoners is unnsuallY s Thao extending to ,only 44 in number, and by greater majority of 'Cases of a comparative'Y a d, ;ling nature. It is, h owever , to h e regr e t7 ac i that the country ke e p s p ace i n ear l y (161 3( 1 ° , 1 4 with the metropolis ; and although the lue e° "ie is not so striking, npwards of one halt ` ha% lt,adly passed their 20111 year. The most s'ir' t eases are those of tw o w omen , one og e " o ti charged with the_ mur d er o f h er i n f ant soon n fp the other, aged 38, charged with the doo" to new-born infant by a p reme di tate d expoi u , t a a the inclemency of the weath . er. There is 0 ' 9 ,1 , third case, which Mr. Justice Be s t stiono bided to in his Charge to the Grand drawing a distincti on b etween mans l aug hter fl . O l murder. It is the case of Jul4n Mod. 19, who, about a week since, presented 3 V -- c lf by way of threat to a person, having pre vi 7;:st supposed that he had extracted the boll. di% unfortunately was not the c.:ae, and tire r !orating the liver, caused instant death. 0 On the Nisi Prius side the lm s in ess has for 3 •b ceeded the general expectation ; ver y i e w . o,`4, 'were calcula'ed upon, but thirty-f our er }t l § ; ed, three of which ate Special 'intim Th ere ,t;) however, hardly a arse which seems calculni ef los claim any great share of public attention. R tl trial of the great questiun betw e en the Dt ; "" , 3 0 1 Chapter of IVineh e ster an d M r . Peming, tb e Sheriff of the County, respecti ng t h e r ight tIJ t it soil, as Lord or Lord Paramount of the g Debit), is gone over to the next Assizes, as - also sonic other imporeantl'inestions. Seven causes %vete disposed of thi3 rlorntnq but none of them of any public interat. Law being the business of this ancient rif t mote respects than one, it may not be arising dr notice, that the Judges had a narrow cse'lr f iss e hearing divine Servi ce unattended as usual o ft Cmporation with the Reg a lia i t happeedno Monday, that a sequestration was enforced the Corporation property generally, but norio, the return from Chula, when the Mace, &c', was impounded with the rest of the v.11114)10' HERTFORD, JULY 21. bi? Four vises were tried to-day, two of ".; were undefended, another was r e f erre d, 0" fourth was the follown:g CARTER AND ANOTHER V. ANDERSON . of This was an action of trover by the assigil ee ,,' v er a bankrupt, named William Curter, to re",o eight dozen of ehret, which the dilendatit 410 “Hedged to have unlavtully converted to bis e c e e use.—The Jury, under the Learned Judge's " sr " Lions, found for the plaintiffs—Damages 3OL SIDE. .ta In this Court the follOwing . nrisi,ners Were and convicted Barnard, for b t ra liti :ri horse' at flitehio, the property of John 1 4 ; , "e r ;1 t 0,-, Joseph Charles, for stealing a mare"at Hat fielifi j i * property ot WObarn Pratt:herr; and Richard for sealing a lamb at Hatfield, the inoperti °ll Dlaryuis of Salist;urv. sras ballot-;;ballot-;; 0,4 Wednesdfty ' $ _might , as Captain G--- f) ti ballot-;; at i\larvp'rt, got out 0 ; 00 depth, and was unfortunately drowned. body was not found till late the spur Captain ASA3RIDG E, who was in compallY bins nearly 'Oared the same fate. ANY . PT -..- :), 1311 . 1 ' 115. . o pelf On Moncti.e.:4l, the Lady of John C.onstnb/e, 13 f . ICei Street, of a tL , •olrcr. /100 'Vt•storday, at he Lawn, South Llrnbcth, the Lad) ? ° Faisett Burnett, E6q. ut a dirughter.- _/' f ISIARIIIr,n. . - P IIII On MondayOnst, At St. Nlary's, Newinzton- butts, h e r' iefluoi Benjamin Tolkien, of the Norwicn tiniim•otiice, " 7 7 0 00. 1 ; place, 1p Elirithuth Frances. ridest daughter of isif• 1 Carter, of Clibrch-row, Newington-hutts. —.../". DIED. f a id Yesterday, at Hammersmith, John Harter,* EVl* 4.) 1 4avendish-street, St. Mary Mame, iu. the 78th Fe ar ° age. cif On Monclay, the 12th inst. Mr. John Bodroan, at big ter's house, Bury-street, fit. Mary-axe, aged 3(2• :‘ LONDON,: Printed by J. B. crutsTAms, of No. w Ormond-street, Queen-square; and publislird Jcc, SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South Molton-street, at T,-,“dr . " Odice, No. 112. Strand ; where Adveitisenient 4 ? Lettere r 44c, (post-paid) muit Iddrcaficd. I ~~ ~/ ,~ -I t t r tglit 1-14; m kt