The Sun. — London, England, 1816-06-14 00:00:00

,„ •-• CO7l/41N1ONS—'(Continued.) 4 ,0 fill M tsTluvrEs. Mr. Data held ., iti his . hand a Petition Trorn a Magistrate in Ireland, complaining•of the con duct of Mi. Justice Fletcher. To him it appear ed the Petitioner had 'lost cause for complaint, Mind hr thiirp2hr it cksirable, that in su ch . cases that 14,mse s hoold make, persons who were in cut hority feel that s l'o'ver existed above theirs, whiAV as Ould not brook oppression or injustice in the exercise of - their ftinctions The Petition was hen read. Jr. - set fOrth that the Petitioner, J. Galbraith, a Magistrate of Ballinasloe, in the county at Galtvav, hat! last year committed a man, and.also a ;vonian with whom he lived in criminal intercourse, charged with a cruel mite der, which had been committed a Short time be fore. They were committed for trial with the approbation of Mr. Justice Day, and in iize 'Course cat the Summer fliscOveties o 1 great imporiaoce bad been made, all tending to inculpate rue parties. The Petitioner complained of the man- Her in which be had been treated On the trial by 2‘lr, Justice Fletcher, who had taken occasion-to say, " hr never knew any good to, conic of such committals." The prisoners were• however en?- licted on the ciektreit evidence, and exeented on the following NVeditetday. The Petitioner veii t tire. 4% assure the liouie, that but for his exer it „, a , „ c :! likely these criminals would have been brought to justic':i. ri.-litionz - .7 further _complained of the treatment be had experienced owthe trial of a person charged with sheep steal .lug. when the same Jodge had declared it . was se as shame and a sin tOr Magistrates .to commit . . ' • ". 1 " The Petition set such poor ierefaiZl -1 / 1 ; forth that Judges had no tight to treat - ii‘tor-ts... Magistrates Who committed supposed .ofenderS; and under these circumstances prayed• for re - - 'l'b e: Petition was nraere4 to lie on the table. Mr. Perrrie, in rising to submit to the House a motion concerning time Magistracy of 'lreland, took occasion to obseeve, there were persons in that Country very desirous of recommending them selves by their violent proceedings against those Whom they considered &sturbers at die public peace. At present he intended to confine himself to the case of one person—Mr. Mimiltdn, Cnr:ate of Itosciea, who had i beeti appointed • one of the Blagist rates of Tipperary, though be did not pos sess one acre of property in the county. The lion. Gentleman then entered into a long, state ment, which appeared to excite considerable in terest in the [louse, _but which was almost wholly inaudible in the Gallery. We understood the pur port-of it-to be, - that .Mr. Hamilton, Inforthed of the existence of treasonable associations, and Of a conspiracy against his life, hati.sent • n person to inquire into the truth of it, amid ectiog on his re. port, had stuffed and placed in. his tirewing-room .figure to,represent hoeself, which hail beet tired St, the pistols having been fornished, by the per ion in Mr. llamilton's confidence. in corise. titmice of this outrage, toorteen persons had been dragged oat of their beds at Midnight, carried a distance-of 40 miles, nod throWn into, ail, where they must have remained three months before they conid . be hrooftla to tri.d, bad not a Special Com mission been ismied .ort .time be.tli!sfon. Thcse regac,s.,. when- hrouglit..toi,trial, had been ace 4nieteti. The ifory—orie of the Most respectable I,4ries - he had ever Seen ,impannella iii ttrat part of .the Empire, hart declared to the Judge' they retire trite satisfied the priioncrs wet e innocent. The prosecutors then became the accused, bet the VIII was thrown out by. the (hand Jury, or in the opinion cif ntatiy, they would have been cast.on being brought to trial. lie 'concluded by moviug, Thi t theft- should he laid before the House, co pies of the correspondence between the:. Irish Coo sternment earl the Rev. J.' Hamilton, Citrate of rtoscrea, and one of the MagiStretei of the County of Tipperary. Mr. Peet, said,' when speaking on this subject, lie was quite an impartial witness. He could have tit;) wish tti conceal any fact Connucted ; a nd while he said this of himself, he of course : meant to say the same for every member of time Irish Ctiovernmerit. To give the lionse a correct view of the question, it was necessary that they shiseld be reminded of t he 'strionS disorders which bad occurred in the county of Tipperary in No, ventber last, when, on the requisition of forty Ma gistrates, it whi found necessary to subject t.ix Baronies to the operation'of the Insurrection Act. 'Lime murder of Mr. Baker followed, who was a '?Magistrate of the highest character, anti who was universally beloved us a )111/411, and, who bad only incurred the hatred of those who deprived him of lite by hrs activity as a ' Magistrate. About a week after the murder of Mr. Baker, Mr. Hamil ton received information that a conspiracy hart been formed against hiM. He communicated this fact to three of the neighbouring Magistrates, and desirtot the essistenee of 'a person connected with the Dublin pollee, of the name of Dwyer, to aseermiti it the information he had received was COlreet is 11C1% , 1411 soon after reported that lie had made Requaintanee with the supposed eouipira tors,' and that a couspiiktey against the life . 4... Mr. Iramitton dia exist. Mr. Hamilton - directed the Fersen to return to thein, to take part in their pro ceedinvs, to follow, but iii no case to Iced diem. A' stuffed fignre-,• intended' to rerresent-- himself, 'yeas placed in his draWatg-room,and this had been fired at, With this device the Government bad potitiog to do , and he did not hesitate tO say, be load been directed by the Lord Lieutenant in eeprehend ittas most: injudicious. For the fourteen persons apprehended, he bad to state that there were two evidences of the existence at' time conspiracy, and one of the persons apprehended had subsequently confessed his guilt, and acknowjedgedAhat. lie for one had fired at what be believed to have been. .11Ir. Hamilton. , Application bad been made for a provision for one informer, in the event of the parties against whom he gave evidence being con., victed, but this had been at 'once refused, .that 1m might have no improper bias ow los eirod. the su bsequent compjaints against Mr. Hamilton; he (Mr, Feel) had laid before the Lord Lieutenant ; and time whol6 of his (Mr. Hatniltou's): conduct hart :been submitted to the consideration of, a Learned Judge., whom it was minnecessary for him to jpinegyrize, Baron Gcotge. Lie (Bawl George) ..' tlee . A 1 that Gentleman to have been in a very infirm state of health at the time .of faker's dull to live been extremely territivd by the dreAd nr ussabsittation. He tOrnhated the deice to ‘vliret t Mr. Hamilton had had recourse, hut stated every thing else that lottt transpired to redound to his Credit i4S ti MAgiUtrilto. Uu anothe'r oecasion, `whet) his conduct bad - beet arraigned, the result had been in every.respect , favottrahle to Gin), and his conduct gellertilly' was st:) exemplary. that the Laid Chancellor, had not thought it his ditty tO dkiniss hint from the Bench. Mr. BRoooltast considered the greatest import ance ro attach to the present motion, and thought a nearer approach htul : now been madethati bac!' been made before, towards probing to the bottom the distraCted state of Itadand. When a charge was heard, and heard without being repelled, like that which had been heard this night agaitot a - MilkiSttate, it was clear there was something that was not tight in the judicial affairs of that coml. try. Ireland 'waain,such . a state that active itia .gistrates were necessary, hot these_ ought to be titen r;bo,diB4ained to wear the.hatigCosof party. The question in the present instance was, whether the Lord Chaucellbr•of Ireland Wav or, was not right in•not striking out the. name of Mr. Bawd tm) from the list of Jast;,:es of Peace i lie com. mented, on the. manner in which Mr. • Pamilton had been -treated, am! on the time Lard Mannert trail allowed for nwking different reports on this smbiect before ire cr o ne to a decision. Ileul the Lord Chancellor of Ireland always acted' in simi tar cases with the sJtue deliberation ? ilatthe lint even'on• .slightgrontls caused Magktrates to be removed Some iima•ncet. % There WitS• a case where misconduct -was proved, yet the Mnistr , ' • was not removed, though it tea , • worn, m this -outv,„ rv••-•• ...tie no parrs , feelings interfered with the adMinistratitm of Justice, would have caused a person in such a situation to be intritediately dismissed.' AL StrrToN did not believe any person thought the conduct of the Lord Chancellor in this case had been' other than • correct, but whe ther it w i ts so or not, he tots sure there was no perwan in that !louse or out of it, that %void(' im pute to the Noble Lord improper motives. Air. PoNsosaY 'said Ito hitd received a letterfrom a 'Noble Lord .in Ireland, whieh Would satisfac torily repel the charges urged Against the Judge whOse conduct broil been arraigned this night in a petition. Ile however had wiihed that the peti tion be received,' and had t.tere. I r ore nut brought it for'wurti when it was piesented. When the lion. Men k ber who had presented it, took any further 000 ho the subject, that tvoltitl be the time for hirn to refute the allegatious it contained, lie did not blante Lord MallyerS for not iTinoving Mr. Monition, 1;61 he thi , w4ht it unfortunate that a Magistrate who had aetet; ;Is lie had done should IfW - still ill the. Commission. When infortned of the existence of a contpirney, he thought Mr. 114. milton had drat very. wrong. to furnish the COll - ors with pistols,.powder, and ball, to carry their plait into effect, instead of - putting them down at once. The law revired not the firing to prove the . exi t qc,nce of a conspiracy ; Hint en tht;io to) , Ll l ol{llll4 float outrage, led them probably into a dibtinet ott s 6tee, which Was pi niOvablr, tinder, another Act- oll'arlianteut.= • f Mr. VESE.Y..Etruntut.,D thought no one could approve of the devise-to .which Ijr. lianulton,lottl : had recourse ; .hut that GentleMao!s ititirm state, of health cons4lered,' and the effect rouscrinetitly produted• on bito by the murder of Baker, he ought not to he judged with that severity which would he e4lled for under other circumstances. — Ile did not rel.;iet Z:131 the present motion had been made (though he could not give it his support), as it ltad'aiven his Right, llon. Friend an oppor tunity:of offetiag some satistactory F4pianations to the noose, Jim{ as it went. to prove, to tile M 4 -1- gistrites of the Sister Kiugdom that the eye of iii owe %vas constantly pp theph words • After a few from Sir ,J,, Newport, Aft. Daly, Mr. Prittie, aml Mr. Pe'el, the motion was withdrawn. CAS'ARiIBAGI4 presented certain papers relative. tn' reatdatioos Fareign . StAte'l li3 to Itootatt Catholie , i,'''which were ordered to be re- . (erred to the Committee on the subject. CASE OF MR. 011ANLON. Mr. BROUGHAM rose to call the attention of the H ouse t o th e ease,mf Mr, o',lfaidon, Gentleniall at the Irish Bar, whose name had been struck off the Ikt of the Magistrates of the Counties' of Down ant/ Armagh byi Lord Manners. The ground of Complaint, was, that no reason had, been assigned: for this degradation. Vrnm the statement of Mr. O'Hanlon, it appeared that his name had been strnck off the list in :1801, but he was afterwards re-instared.' • About the beginning nt this - year his name was again struck ; nor had any reason been assigned. for the act, he hay ing been merely told that it been done in conse quence of representations made - by certain respect able Magi,htrates. It appeared ,that- Mr. 0u:0 ) - 11)4 - 6d an interview with the Attorney-General of Ireland (Mr. Samin), during wide!) lie assert ed that that high' Law Officer had advanced cer tain opinions as to ti n s .duties of Magistrates, which he '( 4, (PIIinlon) mi ie hi eemis and unconstittitiOnal, at tending to promote the dissension existing in Ireland, lenitive to the claims of the Roman Catholics, by % saying that a Magistrate might without impropriety be a mem ber of an Orange Society. The Honourable and Learned Gent kmau concluded by moving for leave to bring up the Petition of Mr. O'llaidon• The Petition was then brought up and read, It set forth Mnlt statement of his case, and complained that au mutest!, rrti. outrage bad been enmmittedagainst his feelings and character. .On the question that the Petition should-lie on the table, j, A•lr. Pan observed it was. very strange that within the same hour he should have vccahimi ttt vindicate the Lord Chancellor of Ireland, first, from the charge of not having exercised his nn•. thority in removing irgentiemati from the office of a Magistrate, and then fur hathig exe rc i se d this power. With tespeet to the present case, it - appeared from the statement of the poi tioaer himself, that after his name bad been struck ont‘tor the first time, he had been repbtcvd by Lord Manttera, who Count thcrv;yittsnot 3141 "u: 1 1 2 1a tiro . t . ind i . or his removal. lore, was pretty strong ptessimptive.pilitsf, that his removal now A.as not any act of iitisticti, 'the 1'6610• oceasits'n ire had-ISund t h at t'he Lord Chancellki l t of Ireland his'd replaCeil him in the case %thre he 'had been rettrOv-ed wittront due cause. But, the tact teal, that the lietitirmeit It its not eemasteil in the last instance, on Any slight groom!, for in Fehrnary,last a Memorial had beeti presented to Lord Manners', 'signed by tl`e Bench Of ;Magistrates I 'the counties of Down and Ate , . magh, praying that Mr. O'llanlon mighl he're ittot,ed froth the oilice of Magistrate. Amougit Other firtis reSpeCting the condoctof this,,Geutle- Man, Which were stated in the Memorial, it was Mentioned particulaily, that on au occasion vviicn a soldiel. had Wen tired by .a Martial for nit ,lSSanit upon a Gentleman, a nweting of the MA, gist rates being held upon the subject:, the Peti tioner had made a speech from the Bench of a most improper and miichleeotii rtendency. Metoorial was signed by .aixteen Magistrates of the highest cha rac t e r. it also stated th:4't ;Mr. 011auton had been in the habit of atteking the SeSsions, Ott whitb oecaSions' he constantly acted as.the warm advocate of persons of a certain po!. litical pity ; and delivered such speeches as were calculated to promote distorhanee and to excite a spirit of insobordinaliim. Lora this case, had taken tlit clsinion 131 Baron Mstelel land, who thought it 'serest:ow that Me...U'llan lon should be removed'. lie' would be itirrY that tray snelt iisctrine were to, go abroad, as t'•••! , --10;rd Chancellor should be 91?.. t K ed to bring forward souse specific e11,1• 4r aga i ns t any I,M,4,4is "'at C whom %t it proper to remove, upon whit , • arge it would he necessary to ctthvict the Magistrate, giving; hint, an oPport unity of defend ing himself "eagaiust it. If ::41telt a principle were acted upon in Ireland, there. would be. so cud to any thing like an eflicieot kiovernmeot. As to the conversations which Mr. O'llanlon represented himself to Wye had with' the Lord Chancellor and the Attortnry-Cienera: for Ireland, he:could only sty that . they seemed extremely improba,ble. if they were trne—if it were possible !lost these high persons could have used siteh eXpressions, a qo vernment unlit be very much to he pitied. Which had umong . its officers periiins- who were ca p a bl e of -unbosnoting..theincl%cs to such a person in such a way. Gen. NatinHaM said that lie was personally ac,. quainted With 1400 i of the 16 Magist rates by \OM' t he Memorial s;vas , signed which required t he rettioval of Mr. O'flanlon. Ile knew all those Magistrates: to he ;nen fot tune and of the highest respecta, balmy ; persons who had 'always stood firmly at their posts in the hour of danger. There had un fortunately . beers !nasty- occasions on which itrhatl been necessary to call out military atsi-ranee slur., itt the distmwhees iii the cfflovies in question, and on these occasions Ite - . had always seen' every one of those, Magisicates-artively.euiployeil in the' execution of their dm i("; but lie neV , Ur 011anlon - so einfiloyed on sach °erosions. Ile hael'heod of this Chntlenian's character, and it was sods that be must.. decline,saying any- thing respecting it. Sir II PA. I: t LI. thought the: removal of-alr.• O'fianlou wa. by, fist alealtS , j lt►titi.thlN,anti that the Collifilet of the Cord Chancellor of Ireland', its this mistier, - bad not , beets such as it ()sight to have Vest.. Genenil 114 tit let, nrprO whidi I%e not lie.tr. Mr. J": 4 Es t llO6 14 1 a it was rrillt:nqy improbithie that the Atiorne!„ , Werieral 1re44 . 0 could have had such a converotion with Mr. 0114 n l o n ' as the letter rquesetited. he petition 'Was' aneh that in his Opiniiin it might not to be allOwd" to li e on the table% Mr. could by no means agree in think. ing that •this,petititin ought Writ to lie on the ta ble. Ile eeilainly 4441 not think it very• improba.- hie that the..,Attornert:eneral of Ireland could have beld , iineb. a cooversation : as , that mentioned., in the petition ; bat then it. would be toile a meat thi ug , and nik:iolately. unconstitutional, for the If oose to ik ss ui nc such a pnwei ns : that of rej ec ti ng a p et itio n w hi c h, t owar d s t h e IlUt,e, was 'titiite d e cently worded, On any bitch ground. VYliat ev.er the Petition alleged was at his own peril ; hi l t it Avc,idd be an tnijnyitttiable thing for the . Llonse to reject. such a Petition. As to the ar• gument that the Lord Chancellor of lreLoul ought not to be obliged to state bia reasons fur terrine inga magistrate, he thought it Was a doctri ne which might be carried too for„ and otlr u 4 hich might do away with every thing like respoOility. Oir the whole piestiOn, 4vtild only may tkat lj e wished it was satisfactorily shown, that Mr. , O'Hanlon bad not been reinived merely from : pcfr lineal motives. He would ttlso wish much, that it conk! -1)e „statiti, that any one of the ti,ttett Magistrates who signed the Memorial, was,of the same political principles 'with the 'Petitioner, as shell a circumstance would have conskierabiv weigh.t. Mr, Pe:gr.—explained. There was a fact- stated in tbeMeninrial, which I,e did not wish itt first to mention. It was,, drat Mr. O'llaidon wa3 in the habit of behaving in a manner unbecoming •41 nigiStilite and a Gc!aticlllkn, during the tri4nsife tion of public busine”, by using einitnt, itocio perate, anti insultios Janguage to iris brother gistrates. lit vuetustance he butt interrupted (*ire of the Magistrates in this way, while delivering his opioign frtnn the Ileneh, and the conseq u ence was, dint such at reply provoli,ed, di -it a duel was appridliAlded, Ktad it Me; thOught, pec e sa Ar y to hiliod him ovvr to keep the peke. Mr. .10NES and Nit:. NEI{ noitnally explained_ Sir J. P.N r ,EWro spoke .stronglv the net:es.. sity patting down ail p , irtv stunt. 1 Sir J. SrgwAtti said ,t nat. t lure- was tnorr t to be beard in this I - louse as to the ptcvalence of party. spiritAtong the Iris!: NL“...ist rates than'anrwh ere ehe ; front iii own I,nokt ledge he could, safy that 11e did not think it ehihted t atty such' degree us was sometimes stated. - ;sir 3. Nry.tvoier anti Sir J. l'iTcwattr : explained. PoNsomty stria that ht. thplight sorwe of the ttlleg:ttions - in the Petition Were very tittopr.o -1);11de. C4 , rttiitily"the l'etitioner 104 H right to Crone to the ilotile With a state:trivia of his case. he could filly, that ultiie lie hail, the honour of' holding the tireiti Seal of IrelarlAk i lii 1 14 d, ueok ver tlio.Nght &Pool to ,tome the specific reason tor removing a :thigistratei Tltere were n any cases In nhicii Irk ilitti fount himself !Aar. , Eennave Aillgitratts; if tie !nut 1)441 sake ..t0 tn 3 reition,.ke itin4l(l c(3lit . entre . d, that ta! one bn ' cl t tirseti iti.A4,lhat l,e disbieliceed the assertions coniainea in am retitimi. The only kvespQn lised agaiitit It was ridicale, the Petitibti was theti . ordered to lie . 61 tbe table. Mr. Gitaki , etit. moved ii;l' art account of th'e .4attlisnotes - in circulation tinting the first i 5 &I t s of :each s froin the Ist of June, 1815, to thelst of MaY s 181.6, and also for a copy of the account showink the w:erage - amount of ito"tes PoSt -hills in cirettlatiotl,duHog. it ' t three yeits ExTF.yr Ott). , , ti . o ' fir.SfilTli, Ott pnroosin move for t further papers on, this subject, and, in thelit.*.s place, tor copies of the affidavits on which tent's in Aid had been issued, complained of the number 61 those rtiHnons processes, and quoted s ipr ever c a l l m i r n i s y. tatteesto prove that they had b eet) used in of those priieesse t- a rl !i e i r s e netl is l i t i t.la b l e o el u ) r , t i) " .f r . e . l l l ) t e Y't rso l u r s ce w l - 7: bad no other claims Alan that . they were brewe Mss „.li. and maltsters. There ` Were 'threA ,c4se-' au et ioneeP4 :ipptlttll4.l . them, and heintended in moVe for the aflidaviiv, in order to aketlttOP the grounds on nhich those processes liaif bee!): demituded and gr a nted. His next •••••• " for 711. cf the several fees payable Orr issuilig such f l irocesses,•with the names of the oil:- eers by,wlipm Ortßop Ives %lure rt,,civvi (Ingiug ` ll 7 - Year ending in Dec. 1815. lie couiellitcilthatives°. 401. or 501, were sometimes demand e d, t rliett . t!: real fee did not amount to. more reaStin for moving for t coin eel Ke;:toutd " 1 , ° , i() ;:, 6 ,. ! • fees ‘vis to prevent such impositions, h}' the public home exactly %%hat they had a fie .110(11(1' afterwards naive:for a priVY se" mader and directeiLio the:Chancellor and )33 1 ' 0 " of the Exchequer,. under .lattles the First, to p.r7i vent 'abuses in the issuing ' Emeilis iti Aid, any for a copy of certaiii Rules made in liehrw 6 during the lfifory Tern), in 1.5 Chailes complailos being nutile ul shrews io the issue"'' Events. At this late period of the Sess.ioiilte; should not attempt . to 111.ing in it Bill on t he sith ject.7. tie . believell - t hat every•point should he did 9 coosidered, anti tie row moved for the papers he had ureistioned, in older that the Hoit,c aulljlt e I.irge should have an oppoi Nulty ' giving then) that consideration, 00 tile first question. being put, TheCtiaNC),:t.LO'Rof the EXCEICqUBR said, th lir did 'not intend to object i o a t e B un , Gcrtile mateimotion. • It must be the wish of the thst it any improper Ilse had been made of; 61. • trots in.A cl ,the subject should. be sitted to 411 ' bottom. lie %indicated the limits of, the chequer, nlin had not been rettiiss in their and •Wttliiti, as tar asit lay within't heir mentioned p0"11`.. p e e ve "t„ , the existrttee ribuvi s., sortie di: cases entioned by the notit;urahle understood the !loons of the -Exchequer bail rearlyinterfered, mid set aside i i one of those t tclits. - Lublin.) V'iron was understood to correct Nll errot' into vxliich he hail fallen on it'forther him), respectiog the'.L-seitore-Of errtAin 0 4 "'r the Sheriff -o H I, f i3rEcon. e 1 1131 goody reltroyetl, but lie lout fioce r" ' " :1 : eel a letter frottlThe ittfoOtt luau ) fing they , were still iii his possession." , thy. 3 )1 ATI" it ls bit -Gait! EPA as s ured the ' Gentleman that the l..eartivil Jild;;es were 0 otis as he he to p i even t : ,d nise s orli'itentsiii Aid. lie contended (hilt t h e Coo' of Kt eitecturrinitkacisitinisurred _ a teinot) - " c" 11)4 4. nrr. ' " at. S c AtITH anti the explained. Mt% 'C. ‘Vystvit hoped that there "would he "( objection tO a Committee of inviairy 00 the i ssicl' of Extents. Alter a fete observations WWI tiai CllANCri•Ltiiitt of the Excitatatistil the Varionti'Mations were l it and agreed to, , The lteport of the Silver Coinage Bill "" 3 1 1 r ‘ cetveil,'and the tilt 'ordered for a third readioA „ T.~xc[tetluer> Ctasisoliclatiott "till arras . po, ; t;iottecl to-ouorroW. • The fiirther consideration of the Report of (I ', c , .Committee on z,:aviagßanks• Was postponed I `' Monday'. _ _ • 13 ARR A. Mi. • Colonel I'si.xtett tvishett to suggest tire propric t l, of allowing balt.pay Ofeers . . the is i t,y tol L Army to reside in the existing liarraeks dine i Peace. Suelr an arrangement would be attelitle"., with` no expense to the ,country, and t voaltt Gi more btiteficial. to those Otfieers. thou inolltiw' rit erected to their ealoor. The CIiiNCELLoR' of th e E xc HEQUFR t: disregard 'the suggestion ; but: #s it was t Lie feu° tiPO if NJ",klly's Ministers to reduce the '; ) , a , ratli EStahlishutent its sOOll as possible, iitdC I.( ( he would be rett for the purpose tueittioned 1 -)Y, uqltant Cot. I/se f.A i itY obtain. . leave to bring n a fur pr()viiiing,bet ter accomniodat ton tor his 2 t -- 0 ty's packets in the harhoti'r of I1itIvIle3( 1 . The CIiMWELLOR the Ea cii eau br04: 1 4 , alAi! ) rePeill,tlteAcLiat last Sess 4oll 'exclusive power to the South Sea ,CarnimuY' also a Bill for emitiiitting the Silk 13owitY tation-Att.—Adiourned. . mani. On t.lre 10th inst. at Twicixttiituu, the: lady the Thomas JFIIis Of a JanAlAct. •, . , t,1.1314.1 ED. AI I;a4l'. Y e" rda. YSMOr 11 ng, it Si. liturgy's, M0n....4_1J flail, Esq. to Nliss ‘VattrOunce, both of Yesterday, at St. dats's,c.iltircii, Edward tu Oahu, 3 01 " to Ei , ZAI , fI it, the youngest tisloghter of William lio:lart 77 of , - h toc kf, • Yesterday, at St'. daratit'4 Church, Willi:nu w uud* 1 - 3 ti• of Dew H s ail, Esst,*, - to itachael, datightO r u ‘ ' NlSskli'utd, Bart. of Gattun, • • • MEV. of htg On Witham 1h instant, at Nialrern. in tho 63th Ye 4 r agr, Frankland, Esq. strand *on Of the late AM!' Nit Titouitts "Frankland, of Thirkirhy in Yorkshire', tiar64;fo.. Ou 'Tuesday, the 1 ith inst. at his bintsre,,Teddingt on, diesel, *lulus cratehntid, fig. in the Otit year agt' s......oter.m..ast.e.saftliwskookslaNlO.l.lo/.0 oar LONDON Printed by J. 13. CAItSTAIJI.S, Na. 1. n ur,t t ,fi, 14 . 1 .4krifi; :rnd pnbli CI shed by IV. A: SLIPP*. at the SoN-Orricit, No. tie, Strand ; where l' ur° ' menu, Orders, Letters iirsatiraid),lkc. =lnt be athiressr