The Sun. — London, England, 1828-06-14 00:00:00

FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZETTE. the Court at S'„, Junes's, the 11th day of June, 1525, PRESENT, The King's Most Excellent Majesty iu Council. His Majesty in Council was this ,day pleased to appoint the Right Honourable William Fitzgerald Vevey Fitzgerald, Preside•At of the Committee of Council appointed for the co nsPaeration of all matters relating to Trade and Foreign. Pie Atations. Crown Office, June 13. 7,IEVIRERS RETURNED TO SERVE IN TAILS ritzszacT PARLIAMENT. itomoucit or PLYMOUTH.-The Right J4on. Sir Geo. Cut:Lunt, a Vice-Admiral in his Navy, G.G. in the room of Sir William C f ;:qreve, Bart., derma CITY OF buntiA,Nl.-Vat Right Hon. Sir Henry Har ilinge, of No. 32, GrAienor-place, in the ronnty of Mid dlesex, K.C.R. BOROUGIV TtnaTiss.--Ilie Rigid Hon. Thomas Peregrine Conrtirday. 13431t0u0u OF ST. IvEs.—The Right Hou. Chartes Arbuthnut, of Whitehall-place, in the'eounty of Middle sex, and of Woodford Kettering, in the county of North atnpton. Office of Ordnance, June 12. erratum in the Gazette of the sth February last : Royal Regiment of Artillery—For Brevet Major John Albert Clement to be Lieutenant-Colonel, read Brevet Major John Albeck Clement to be Lieutenant -Colonel, Scr. DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY. Christopher Hammond Wearing and William Green wood, St. Paul's Church-yard, merchants. BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. lm Carr Overenitluul Thomas Charles Bruce, Bread street; warehouse;agn. • BANKRUPTS. Thorr,as Brookes, Cheltenham, Gloucester, carpenter, to burre - xler June 27, at five, 28, at ten, and July 25, at tWo, at the Royal Hotel, Che:tenham. Evans, Stevens, and Evans, Gray's inn-square ; Wyatt, Stroud. David Fletcher, Albemarle -street, Westminster, woollen_ draper, June 27, 28, and July•2s, at twelve, at the Globe Tavern, Exeter.. Winter; Williams, Fossick, and Jeffries, Bedford..row. James Day, Qu a d ran t, Regent-'street, , June 21, July 4, at twelve, and 25, at eleven, ct h e o mit Commissioners. 'Lyddon and. Bown i c m , ttreet, Lin coln'ti Inn-fields. Jsanes Knibbs, Oxford, inakeepr;. , oliPe 18, at six, 19, at nine, and July 25, at elever., at the Three Cups lan, Oxford. .Gaines, Caroline-40'w, Bedford-square; Looker, Oxford.. • , Henry Bell, Leeds, victualler, June 23, 24, and July 25, at eleven, - a s the Conrt-house, Leeds. Straugways and Walker : , Bernard's Inn; T. Robinson, Leeds. I f:lllistin Abbot, Bernondsey-street, Southwark, cord. voilner, June 17, 24, and July 25, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. Whiteley, Token-house-yard. Richard Lee, Kingsland-green, Middlesex, bill-broker,. June 17, 24, and July 25, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. Stratton and Overton, Shoreditch. Joseph Viney, Bristol, cabinet.maker, June 25, 26, nna July2s, at one, at the Commercial Rooms, Bristol,. A l i. bury, Bristol ; White, Lincoln's Inn. John Wentworth Eiger, Camb r id ge , I ,;a k er, June QS, at ten, 26, at one.. and July 25, at tvw;tVi, at tht Buie Inn, Cambridge. Randall and Cambridge ; Fuller and Saltwell, Carlton-chan t b er.ss. s) .....egent , street. Thomas Thomps on. Lewis, surgeon, June 20, at twelve, 21, at, tlerett, .at the Court-house, Leeds, and July 25, at eleven, at the Castle of York.• Stammers, C'olerrin - '..creet, London ; Furbank, Leeds. Art:cures Cambridge, Bristol, merchant, June 26, 27, and July 25, at twelve, at the Bush Tavern, Bristol. (Aeolic and Sons, Bristol;' Clarke, itichsrds, and 11Iedcalf, Chant - Try-lane. William Benjamin Watkins, Ardwicki Lancaster, mer chant, June S 3, 24, and July 25, at eleven, at the Red Lion Inn, Hereford. Church, Great James-stteet, Bed ford-row, London; I'ateshall and Bellamy, Hereford. Wm. Richards, Williams -court, Southwark, measure maker, June t 4, at twelve, July 4, at eleven, and 25, at twelve, at the Court of Corrunissioners. I%leytnott and Son, Great Surrey -street. James Sainsbury, Liverpool, tebacc.o-manufacturer, June 2:3, 25, and July 25, at two, at the Clarendon-- buildings, Liverpool. Kearsity, Lothbury ; Liverpool, 3artlea Taverner, IludderefielJ, innkeeper, July 1, at six, e, at eleven, at the 'White Hart Inn, Huddersfield, and 25, at eleven, at the Castle of York. Wigglesworth and Ridsdale, Gray's-inn-square ; Thompson, Stansfeld, and Thomson, tialifax. William Urnderwood, Cowley-mills, Gloucester, edge tool-maker, 24, at five, June 25, and July 25, at eleven, at the Rant Inn, Gloucester. White, Old-buildings, Lincoln's-inn; 131oxsoute, Wells, and Bloxaome, Ditreley; GlAucestershire. Richard Whtatley, Twycross, Leicester, victualler, June .26, at four, 27, and July 25, at eleven, at the Castle Inn, Tarnworth, Warwick. Hicks and Braikenridge, Bartlett's buildings, Holborn; Nevil, Taumorth. William Booth, Liverpool, boot-factor, Joly 7,8, and 25, at one, at the Clarendon-Intildings, Liverpool. Taylor, Clement 's-inn, Loudon ; Whitehead, Liverpool. Samuel Fagg, St. Andrew's lull, Doctors' Commons, builder, June 17, 27, and July 25, at nine, at the Court- of Commissioners. Stratton and Overton, Shoreditch. DIVIDENDS. A. Andr.rson, Bowling-green-place, Kennington, master mariner, July 4, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners —E.. Hobson, Shoreditch, linen-draper, July 4, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners—L. A. Hollander, Winches ter-street, Surrey, diamond merchant, July 4, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners...A. Knight, Mahlon, Essex, tailor, July 4, at twelve, at the Court of Cononissioners— ' R. Lemming, Hatton-cona, Threadneedle -street, silkman, July 4, at bieveu, at the Court of Commissioners—R. S. Maskall, Basinghall-street, builder, July 4, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners—P. Milne, New York-street, Cannmereial-road, and T. Hathway, jun., Wade-street, Poplar, merchants, July 4, at one, at the Court of Corn roissioners-8. 11. Sweettuan, Pentonville, stock-broker, July 4, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners— and J. Hampton, Manchester, grocers, July 16, at tee, at the Star Inn, Manchester—E. E. L. Blood and Hunter, Aldersgate.street, furnishing-ironmongers, July 12, at eleven, at the Royal Hotel, Birmingham—T. Chandler, Bedminster, Somersetshire, coach-builder, July 7, at one, at the Commercial Rooms, Bristol—S. Cook, jun. Afoorharttes, Leicestershire, cattle-salesman, July $, at twelve, at the office of Mr. Wratislaw, Rugby, Warwick- Ake--Henry Clark, Swallowfield, Wiltshire, grocer, July 7, at one, at the Wheatsheaf Inn, Rending—W. Dyer, Batheaston, Somersetahir e , victualler, Oct. 7, at eleven, at the White Lion Inn, Bath—W. Dunn, Louth, Lincoln shire, coal-merchant, July 7,8, at eleven, at the New King's Head Inn, Louth —G. Herbert, Sibbertoft, North amptonshire, . salesman, July 8, at one, at the office of Wratislaw, Rugby, Warwickshire—J. A. Hawker and J. Whitehouse, Birmingham, merchant s , J n l y s , at t h e Royal Hotel, Birmingham—W. W. Bayne,, Neatb, Gla morgansn' ire, banker, July 7, at eleven, at the Town Iggulden, Dover, painter, July 4, at eleven, at the Guildhall, Canterbury—H. Phillips, H. Phillips, jun. and T. Pole, Birmingham, toy-makers, July 5, at tw e l ve , at the Royal Hotel, Birmingham. CERTITIQA TES —J tadr_l! H. Idaireti, GlOucester, musical-instrument-maker—R, W. Elliston, Theatre Royal, Drury-lane, boolseller—f, 11.algson, Cock-hill, Ratcliff, glaSs-dealer—R. Katmtze, Chertsey, plumber—J. 31angnall, Mimchester, agent-- W. Mangual, Piestwich, LancAtire, blocher—.T. Pepper, t;liipping Barnet, inukeeper—W. Parsons, Melksham, Wilt...hir e , tope-maker—lt. Robson, Hanley, Stoke-upon • Trent, Staffordshire, grocer—T. Stephenson, New Md tnii, Yorkshire, grocer—J. Stanton, Worcester, coal nicrchatit. • PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. J• Braddock and J. Cowles, Wellingborough, North. amptonsliire, wine-merchants—J. Cavill and G. Shillibeer, Bury-street, Bloomsbury, coaehruakers—D. Cooke, and J. Pinder, Searberougb, linen-drapers--J. Gann arid W. Dickinson, Fencburch street, tailors-IJ. E. Har vey aid W. West, St. Erth, Cornwall, ironfounders-1 Nau►tnan, J. Prosser, and J. Edwards, Bow-lane, tea dealers—S. Hyde and F. Gard, Exeter, woollen-drapers —C. H. Jennings and J. Smart, Edgeware-road, victual lers—W. Moston, T. andJ. Lord, H. Webb, and E. Butter worth, Manchester, pa c kers -_T; Sankey and N. Harvey, Caial.bridge-wharf , Kent - road , coro-slesmeri—J. War mi►gten, Plaistow and J. Bsybs, Great Ilford, Essex, graziers. . t SCOTCH SEQUESTRATION. M. W. lvison, and R. Cliarlem, Gia tgow, ate ve int% I'RADE.—The trade between this city an d London is rapidly improving. On Saturday evening,.the Tourist steam-packet arrived off Newhaven, with upwards of 400 packages, chiefly for Edinburgh, Glasgow, an d Paisley. This was rather above the vessel's room, burden,:and the master placed some of ,the weather-proof merchandise on deck, and covered them with tarpaulins.— This cargo was folly a third larger than the last.--.-Scots man. LONDON MARKETS. NEWGATE AND LEADENHALL MARKET& At per stone, by the Careahn s. d. to.. d. r. d. toe. d. Beef 2 'ti - 3 81 Veal . mutton v.4b• 3 8 5 0 6 3 Pork 4 0 5 5 LanTh 41. Ocl. to ss. 6d. • Rent Pockets b.issex Pint) . Fspx Ditto. Lam Bitfo, Kent 8ag5.,.,, Sussex Ditto Essex 110Peto+., :E..1 OF HOPS.—June 13. 51. Os. 51. 1,2 4 . ; to 41. 15s. 61. .t 9 5/. Bs. • ter. as. to 5/. 12s. T. Os. P/. Os. to 91. 15s. Os. 81. Os to 91. Os. Secenda 4/, la& 51. fli. to 51. 51. - -▪ wo• M 4i. 4s. 41. 10a. to 4/. 151. 41. 45. 41. 12s. to 51. Os. O• ld Duty laid at A:130,00a WHITECHAPEL -lAY MA Itti C.-4tioc day 725. fkl. to 975. (RI. I Clover oes... VO.g. OLL tb 115 s. 0(1. Straw. ---_,326.. Ott. to Itis, tkt. New V Mtddlinl PRICE OF rotkrOES.-- , 314ne 1 3. re •-• 01. 12s. to 0/. 12s. per ewt. OZ. 74, to 9/, fisjitt'''. tRICE QF 01 Rape Oil, brown 1/1. Refined 0 Linseed Oil • _ 17 10 10 10 6 0 Linseed Cake at'ttre bill!, per thousand Rape Cake, per tdit PRICES OF . Per lb. d. to ' Eutts....--...50 to :Alb.— 20 21 Ditto to 061 b.— 22 VS nresslng Hides 14 1/ Floe Coach tildes Crop Hides, 35 to 401 b. It 10 to &lib. RI 18 Ditto 18 20 LEATH HER. Per ta. Tanned tinhe HIM:. I. 17 SparitSill)ittO 20 25 Pet dozen. Skins—W to 401 b. 19, 23 Ditto to 701 b. 23 Ditto 70 to 1301 b. 2% 23 Small Seals, Greenland 18 19 • RAW HIDES. rer Stone. . s. d. to s. d. Per Stone. s. it. to s. d Best Heiters&Stoers3 0 3 4 Ordinary I It) 2 Middlings —.4...,---2 6 2 9 Mai ket Cattt..s. R SkIKEY SKI NS. 2s. tki. tons. &l. OF. 01 to Os. 7J. thi. co Os. Oct, PRICE - or. TALLOW, SO X - P, pet - figib.i.—June Town Ta 40s. Od. Yellow 745. Od. Yellow Rinds • • - 393. td. Mottled 80.. Od. White 10S• Od. Wh i te. Od. Soap Ditto • - Od. Graves 20s. Od. Melted Od. Good s', Od. Ditto Rough , ...--.....21‘. Od. „,„,„ --` • 01. ” RAW FAT, per stone q 1 .s.b.--June 13. ....11 , uo by Tallow (as stated by the Tallditr tlelters) 2d, YEil E The Mk* NT.I.• :S. of Stove Csindsts, in the retail shop s , ig ag follows Catkales, per 51ce.....10X1. to (4.Ckl. Mo.t!ds, per ' slosem (id. COAL MA RK.I.X.--June 13. 32‘. 9.1. Walls ind Newinrch., —3O 6 I)itto Perkins and Co. 32 9 Hebburn Mat 33 0 Dittn 33 6 —.— 33 Q Man Russell's —35 0 31 U Russell's 33 h Jestriond New....05. , .....411. 26 9 Walk End Hettoia--- 36 0 Killingworth - 32 6 Walk End Lainbton— 35 9 Ord's I‘e3htigh 2B 6 IValls End Lyons— 33 9 Petty Last Si 6 Ditto Stewart's 36 0 31 9 Russell'slletton'sW.E. :15 3 Willington 32 9 Calm Pen bury 25 0 Wylara 31 9 Elgin Main 31 6 Wall's End Browns.... 32 3 Hartley 29 0 Ditto Burniton 3g 0 AO/atone 31 0 Ditto Carraial Co. '•• 20 0. Garsherrie 3() 0 Ditto Clark! altcl 11.'0, 30 6 Walls End Nutt —.... 22 0 J)itto Crathriligton.-- 28 3 Lambton small 22 0 Nth) iiilda 30 9 Tantield 'Fruiter— 31 6 Oitto Northumberland 30 9 Liddell's Trader.......-- 29 0 Ditto Peareth 30 0 Old Etherley 5ma11..... 19 0 Ships at market, '7o3(—Ships sold, 46%—thisotit, 24q. 1 A t61:1 fteattmont Beaton (From the London grew Pdce Current of Friday.) • • Eitfraast,:-.The transactions in Muscovades have been on the most ektensive scale this week ; and as the holders have been nearly as anxious to effect sales as the buyers to pur chase, there has been little variation in the currency ; the sales are estimated at 5,200 hhds. and tierces hiring the week.—To-day the sales of Muscovades are on a more confined scale than usual, owing to the few good new Sugars that are left on sale. We never knew a period when the supply of refined goods wax so inadequate to the demand, and the scarcity of goods is not confined' to one description, but extends from the finest to the lowest quality of refined ; the fact is clear that the late Ministers have, by their measures, diminished, if not destroyed, this with other great staple mazinfactures, and when the de mand arises, the few refiners that are left are unable to supply the demand. We cannot quote a great advance, as purchases to any extent cannot be made ; but for the parcels that offer, prices generally is. higher, have been oLtained. This afternoon the same scarcity of goods and the same anxiety to boy continues, without producing any further marked alteration iu prices. Molasses are rather lower. Foam); SUGAR.--The stock here in first hamls is re duced to about 400 chests white, 50 chests yellow Havan nah, and about 400 chests Brazil. The sales this week are fine white Havannah, 48s. 6d. ; yellow is also much in qui red-after--400 iheeits Pernams sold, brown, 255. a 275., middling white, 265. ; 100 chests . Rios sold, good yellow, 315., low white 365., an d goo d 40s. —lhe demand for all descriptions of Foreign Sugar continues, but there are ne adequate supplies. The whole sold at full prices. EAST INDIA Soca as--Purchases of aimall parcels of Bengals are reportt4l at very full &ices. `Zorly in the week 5,100 bags Mauritius were brought forward, the flue and grocery descriptions sold freely and at full prices.; the low yellow and brown went oil heavily This forenoon dig public sale consisted of 3,539 bags !►Mauritius. The following were the prices :—Yellow, good ditto; 58s. 6d. a 61s. ; ditto middling ditto, 565. 6(1. a 58s. ; ditto low ditto, Ms. 6d. a 565. ; ditto fine, 61s. Gd. a 635. ; &Own, good to fine, 535. a 545. ; ordinary to middling, 51s. 4525. 6d. COFFEE.—The public sales of Coffee this week have consisted chiefly of British Plantation descriptions, which have sold freely, and.. at rather higher prices.—A parcel of ordinary Brazil sold at very high" rates, 355. and 355. 6d. ; Ceylon 325. 6d. a 355. ; pale good ordinary St. Domingo 355. By public sale this afternoon 245 casks British Plantation Coffee, Jamaica and Demerit's; good middling Jamaica sold at 735., middling at 695. ; .Chiefly Demerara taken in at 68s.—Generally Jamaica Coffee may be stated brisk and 2s. higher; other deicriptions unvaried. Rem, BRANDY, and Ilou..usus.—The orders for Rum appear extensive, but the buyers expect to purchase on lower terms when the supplies become more abundant. The only sales we have at present to report are parcels of fine Jamaica, 4s. 2d. to 4s. 4'tf. : Demerara 28 to 30 over, at 311..8r1. ; Leewards, proofs and two over; at 2s. 2d.. and some parcels free on board at proportionate prices. Brandy is heavy; Geneva unvaried. At a late hour to day, purchases to the amount of nearly 350 puncheons of Rum transpired; chiefly fine Jamaica, 29 to SF over, at 4s. a 4s. 4d. ' /IMP, FLAX, and TALLow.—The Tallow market has been heavy and declining. Ira Hemp or Flax there is little alteration. • The letters from St. Petersinargla are dated the . 28th of May. Exchange 10141. Tallow 97 and 102 rubles. Hemp 93 # cut. 95 —Flax 90. ' hliff PROV/SIONS.-Beef is very heal/ - ; Pork on the decline. Bacon continues in steady demand; Butters are . . t tie varied. INnino.--1 he arrivals of Indigo are about 6,000 cliest. The approaching sale is now estimated at nearly 10,000 chests ;' there are no purchases of any extent to report. TonAceo.—Tliere are no purchases worth reportiug. SPICES.—The inquiries after Cloves, Cinnamon, and Pepper, are continued; ot her East India Spices are neglecte4l. The late sales of Pimento are ord. and middling Bid. a Bid: ' Hon.—The duty from 130,0001. has fallen to 120,0001. The accounts front the Hop districts are rather unfavourable to--day; but few or no transactions in Hops ate lately re ported. Ous.—lti Fish Oils there is no alteration ; the sales of Seed Oils are on extensive scale. COUNTRY CO Per t uarter. riaßi nptoke _Bath idgewe CheAtertield • Derby Dorchester— Exeter ELungerford Itorusey Shaftesbury Sheptou Mallet Sherbonie Taunton • ••••••••••••••...W ... Per Bushel. Shrewsbury ,M43_.#11 Wheat 54 60. 4R 62 48 60 53 55 52 56 5.2 56 3ti 58 44 56 17 59 42 e 2 58* G 2 48 t,6 454 6 3 -"" 42 ra 55 55 as 27 32 29 34 .3'2 :IS A.tiAi THY. W LEK Oats. 59 52 ; 3 8 511 5 6 48 s 50 58 e. d. s. d. 80 84 23 • • 28 211 27 21 No Bums. 38 43 40 48 16 24 24 28 23 25 23 29 17 ' 22 25 ?I 21 20 28 IS 31 40 4S 42 50_ 46. 49 47 51 43 - bU 42 . 50 31 32 26 21 25 25 31 ' 21. 30,- 26 32 - 30 33 28 30 - 28 28 30 24 29 30 8. d. 11.4. 49 6 58 60 38 GS - 42 '36 42 48 64 21 ••.M:1 23 26 25 20 30 22 26 18 22 24 26 s. d. s. d. 48 66 33 40 42 48 40 4:3 40 42 s. cf. s. (I. 00 00 . . SOUTHALL 11... At. this day's market, which was well supplied,and r;;_ they numerously attended both by town an d country buyers, each Lind of fat stock met with a heavy sale, at the following . prices per stone of 81b. to sink the olials :-- . • - ' Jamb - .55. Od. to 6.;. OLi. Beef. -.. :is. 4d. to 45. 6:d. Veal ...»•..._..45. al. to :)5. 24. Mutton ~......r... 3 6 4. 6 1 5 Bork .—...,.. 4 4 4 8 The foregoing quotations arc ecf and Mutton 2d., Lamb 40., and Veal from 2d. toad. per stone beneath thew: of thiaday se'n night ; at which Pork wag stationary. A considerable part of the supply left the market unsold. LEWES MARKET.—June 10. Beet-- Is. I(kt. to 4s. 6d. Veal Os. 04. to Os. ect. 10m I nd' 4 0 4 8 Pork 0 0 0 0 Lamb 4s. Sd. trl ss. 4d. Supply for the time of ye a r moderately good, and trade on the whole dull. • MANCHESTER SMITHFIELD.—June 11. At per lb. , Md sinking the °. • : 4, •2fa Sheep_,..,.., to Jil. ,23 6.1. to VI ;140( attic ,--4 . (4 146 Pigs 4934 Lam), at f3ad. to lid. FOREIGN iNtELLIGENCE. FRENCH PAPERS. . . (From the Gazette de Fra'n'ce, dated Thiladay.) MAY 10.—All the new concession s of the Porte haVe proved fruitless, as might have been ex- Oeted. On the other hand, the expected. result of its ob stinacy has arrived ; we are at war; Pent has had its siens dispelled ever since the 13th. On that day we re ceived the news of the passage of the Pruth by tlne'RtMalts, as well as the Russian Manifffittn s eta taunt Nesselrode's letter to the Ct'at.tl The Damn iruniediately an extraertlihal•Y meeting. Its - sitting's have since been IMi both day and night, and yesterday war w4satiiioiniced by pniclimation in xll :the market pliteeS, and iii - all the MosqUe 4 3. the MtcasAltne; i'eCitved ibis news with the in dilfe'renee Whi , h.. is a consequence of ,their religious-ftith, the public tranquillity has nut yet been interrupted for a single moment. MAY 19.—(Ft otn another Correspondent);—The Porte received .on • the 14th the Declaration of - War b 5, Russia, and on the lfith news of the - passage of the Pruth, Comtlitsiiiners of the Divan publicly announced thh becliration of War in the market-places and the mosques. At the same time an -Ordinance was issued for a general arming, strictly enjoin all the Dlussulmans to unite for the defence of their religiOn - and their country, and to go to the resitterWe of the Chief" of the several quarters to receive arms. it is by these measure s that the Porte has answered the Declaration of Russia ; and it •is preparing to support the'contest: At the smile time it has htatle the European Ministers acquainted with its resolution, requesting them to inform their respective Courts that it was going to try the fortune of arms in de &het of its incontestible rights,.and that it would rather perish than suffer laws to be dictated to it, so long as it had arms in its hands. • To the general surprise, the tranquillity of Cm capital has not been interrupted in this critical moment. The Standard of the Prophet, which is generally displayed Out all declarations of war, has not yet been hoisted. ' -• • .No fears of excesses are entertained at. Pera‘ M. d'Ot, tenfels„ who was going to the bathsatt Brussa; has resolved to remain at his post. The troops that were thd capital have been ordered to assemble at.Boinnuk Caekine ,several detachments of regular troops are already gone thlthet. The Asiatics, not trained to the European discipline, have not hitherto made any preparation for departure. On the whole, the appearance of the city is nu more military than it was a few days ago.—dluysburglt Gazette. ODESSA, MAY 23.—W e expect every moment the fleet limn Sebastopol, which -ha 14,000 regular troops on board ; the transports hired by the Government have re ceived orders to join it. They arc laden with ammunition and provisions for four months. The Empress is expected to-day. VIENNA, JUNE 2.—The Emperor of Russia is expected at Bucharest. The bombardment of 'brad (Braila, or Brailow), commenced on the 22d; several Turkish de tachments, which came out to forage, have been made pri soners by the Bussians, who have cut off the communica tion with the fortress. All the trees and houses in the environs have been burned by the garrison, that. the bat• teries may be able to act. The Russian troops in the - camp are engaged in making fas c in e s an d l a dd ers , and g'is sup posed they mean to carry the place by storm. Braila never yet has been taken, and it would be regarded by the Turks if it should be so soon taken. Active preparations are making for the passage of the Danube, which, it is said, will take place on the 28th.— Augsburgh Gazette. • Feel:en FUNDS, JUNE 11.—Fivr per Cents., 104 f. 101 f. 10c. 20c.; Three per Cents., 691. 95c. 701.701. sc. ; Bank Actions 1,9251. 1,9201. 1,925 f. ; ltentes des Naples, 75f. 74f. 95c. 75f. 74f. 95c. ; Rente d'Espagne, 9; Royal Spanish Loan, 731. 3 ; Rentc perp. d'Es pagne, 493 5043 SO 50 1 1 503 ; Ifaytian Loan, 6551: Exchange on London—one month (money), 25f. 25c.'; three months, (money), 25f. 15c. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS, JUNE 13. The LORD CEIANCELI:OR took his seat' at ten minutes past five o'clock. Sir A. GRANT and others brought up a copy of the Iteport made by the Select Committee appointed in the Session of 31;21, to take 'into consideration the salmon Fisheries of Scotland, and the United Kingdom. Also the appropriation Bill for applying the Surplus. of the Ways and Means for 1828. Lord DE DUNSTAN - VILLE preseutcd a peal. - tion against Slavery. Lord MAYNAItO presented a petition from the Colchester Agricultural Association, against the pro posed scale of duty on the Importation of Foreign Corn. Lord BROIVNLOW presented a petition from Lincoln, for the repeal of the Bill restricting the cir culation of Small Notes. . Lord DUNCAN presented a petition from the Gentry, Ship-owners, Merchants, Owners of Land and. Occupiers of Dundee, against the pro posed scale of duty on the importation of foreign corn: The petitioners .objected to thii; Bill on account of the very high ; rate of duty proposed; and prayed their Lordships to adopt a fixed scale of duty:. In these sentiments the Noble Lord, con, curred. He objected in tolo to the graduated7icale. The only mode orgi wing satisfaction to the community at large on this subject was to adopt a fixed scale. at an infinitely lower rate. _ _ Lord EXETER presented a petition from the owners and occupiers of land of various parishes .in Lincoln to the same effect. i be Duke of RICHMOND presented a petition from the owners and occupiers of land, in Sussex, praying for protection against the enormous impor tation of foreign wool. The Noble Lord subse quently moved that this petition be referred to. the Seim Committee. • Lord KING presented a petition fro m th e Pro : - tetnantDissenters of Honiton, Devon, thanking their Lordships for the measure they had paSsed in re lieving the Protestant Dissenters from the disabi lities under which they laboured, and praying their. Lordships to pass a similar Aet with respect to the Roman Catholic; and thereby put an end to all re ligious anim os i Laughter.) The Marquis of BIJT.E presented a petitidu 'from Neeth, Glamorganshire, against Slavery. Upon the motion of the Earl of SHAFTES BURY, the Covent-garden Market IMproVement Bill was read a third rime. Lord ROSEBERRY moi'ed that the House be summoned for Monday next, upon his motion re specting the Scotch Settlement Bill. , The Marquis of LANSDOWNE presented petit tions from the manufacturers and workmen of Berks . , for the diMinution of taxation on the Importation of Foreign Corn. Also a petition from the Owners and - Occupiers of Land in Lincoln, for proteetion on Britisb wool. Also a petition from South Shields, against Slavery. Also petitions. froin IVlOnicyFear: mouth and Kingsbridge, Devonshire, to the same . effect. The Earl of FALMOUTH presented a petition front Callington, in Cornwall, against the importa tion of foreign wool; also a petition from the same place against Catholic Emancipation. The Earl-of LONSDALE moved that the report. of the Committee on the Aire and. Calder Canal Bill be .reeeivel • • The Earl of SHAFTESBURY proposed to add a clause, repealing any advantages which the cont. pony might have hadhy a former Act, in the ‘collec• tion of the church and poor's rates. Lord TENTERDEN supported the amendment, which , cu was opposed by. Lords LAUDERDALE, WHARN- . CLIFFE, and ROSSLYN. The House then divided, when there appearea=. For the clause - ' l4 , Against it' ' . 46 - Majority against the clause . —32 The Report was then received. ' ' CORN LAWS. ' riety of occasions it bad been necessary for the Government to interfere, in order to introduce foreign corn by means of jiroclarnations into the markets of this country, so that the consumer might not be distressed by the too high price of corn at one time, and that the agriculturist might not he ruined by the too abundant supply at another. Under these circunietanres the principle of duties was adopted, and the trial made by the Bill of last year proved that that principle might be. resorted tb with adv an t age . There were various interruptions to the Systeth of ptolti. hition during the sever al years in which that system was ens , . Oloyed. Not only did the Government sustain great incon veniences, but the disadvantages to the ctirn-growers was very great, and there were other evils attending the - System. There was jealousy, on t h e part of the agricul turists of this country—there was jealousy on the Conti nent—men complained of being thrown out of einploy inent--and the Government could never interfere to the satisfaction -of all parties. For these reasons it beCame ne cessary to adopt awl arrange a system that would meet the want; of the country. The GovernMent did riot wish to recur to a power that was arbitrary—that was, in fact, il legal on the part of the Crown ; and on. all these grounds it was determined to adopt a different system. This was not the time to discuss the amount of - the duty. He had stated on former occasion& that that amount was sufficient ; but if, in the course of the discussion, - any Noble Lords should go into the question of the duty, he should have the opportunity of making a. reply. The remainder of the Bill referred entirely to the method of taking the averages. In everyrespect but that, the Bill was a copy of that which passed last session. The only alterations which applied to the averages were those required• by the existing system) instead of the former. The old system was an arrangement for taking the averages; by the new system, it was pro posed to take them every six weeks. The Earl of L AUDERDALE, notwithstanding that- lie The Duke of WELLINGTON" said, in moving that the Bill on this subject he read a second tine, be did not fell it necessary to go at great length into the questian, as he 414 the opportunity on . a former occasion of going very fully' into the subject. The principle of the. Bill was the only subject at present in dispute. The principle of this 13111 w t ►s the regulation Of the Corn Trade, by means of a duty instead of prohibition. That principle was adopted by a large majority of that'llouse in the course of last session., The principle of prohibition was one .which was new in this country until 1815. Till then the principle had been rather that of duty than actual prohibition. From the year ISIS till the present period, the system of piohihition had been attended with many inconveniences, and on a va was suffering from severe indisposition, which would corn pel him to require the indulgence of their Lordships; had felt it his duty to come down to the House to oppose' this Bill. His object has always been to ascertain what were the best means of maintaining. the wealth of the country, and at the same time procuring, for the poorer orders a cheap and a steady price of bread. With the view of obtaining' the cheapest as well as the steadiest price for grain, he had first considered this question in 1813 ; and the Noble Lord who was then at the head of the Go vernment, and who, though an opponent of his, was a. fair opponent, and one whose . absence ho should ever lament, told him that in the course of the next session of Parlia ment, the question would be brought forward by his Ma jesty's Government, who intended to propose a protection by prohibition up to a given price. He then assured that Noble Lord that, though not generally a supporter of the Government, he should certainly support them in that view of the subject ; and those who were in the House at that time must recollect how favourable lie had been to such a measure. The Noble Lord had told hint, that - that law should he a permanent law of the country during the con tinuance of peace. He (Lord Lauderdale) knew that the prosperity of thecountry depended upon the permanency of that law; and be deeply deplored the change of the system. It was au unfortunate circumstance, that the first remon strance against thg law was by the agriculturiststhemselves. He rose on this, as on other occasions, not for the purpose of advocating the interests of the fandholders against -the lower orders of the community, God forbid he should do so, for he firmly believed they were best provided for wh en they Were combined. There were three systems advocated in this House: There were first, those who contended that there ought to be a free trade in eorn—lthen those who con tended with hint fora prohibition up to a certain price, or for a prohibition by &ay; and the distinction which the Noble Duke seemed to him to have taken on that point, was, in his mind, a distinetiOn without a difference. For century past, the system of the law of this country has; been to protect agriculture by prohibitory duties; . -and in the best times for agricultural prosperity, that Course had been followed. In his opinion, the scale of duties proposed by the Noble Duke was likely to produce different effects at dif ferent times: It would be favourable to the agriculturist in one state of the market, and unfavourable to him in another. In his view, nothing could be more prejudicial to the country than a free trade in grain. It was an im possibility to introduce it, it would starve the community— and the more nearly they approached it, the more should he reprobate such a system. It was now for the first time that he had occasion upon this subject to refer'to the History of the Roman Empire, which afforded a strong proof that the abundance of grain imported from the subject provinceS bad ultimately ruined the agriculture of Italy. In his re marks upon that subject, Varro had stated, that the pro duce of Italy, to the quantity imported before that period, was as 10 to 1 ; and Colurnella, sylmafterwards wrote upon the same subject, described the produce to have fallen as low as 4 to I.,—[The Noble Lord was here interrupted by some remark from Lord IS.h.s, and turniEg to that NaLlo,na., ha said] :—These were classical authors, whom his Lordship must be acquainted with, and might quote from them if their opinions had been mistaken. In the Treaty between :the Icing of Spain and his subjects in 1665, it was stated that the agriculture . of that country had been destroyed by the protection which was granted to the importation of foreign grain, and the people prayed that a different system might be adopted, and the home agriculture protected ; and that the country might not be rendered as it ,had been, dependent on foreigners, who would leave them without a supply, when they were in need of, it themselves: . He would state an anecdote upon this subject, which shoved the way in which this free trade had been viewed in another place. In 1735 the Vizier of Turkey had encouraged to so great an extent the importation of ,foreign grain, that there were at one time no less than three hundred foreign ships laden witlegrain. The people of both countries complained of this ; because in the one it took away theircorn, and in the other it de stroyed the market for their own produce; and the conse quence was, the poor Vizier lost his head. Bet what was the effect on the price of corn ? Why, that the same quan tity of corn that had been sold at 17d., was actually raised to 6s. In modern times, an instance of an opposite kind had occurred. In Sweden, the, home agriculture had been so much encouraged that the produce exceeded the demand, and they were obliged to distil 200,000 quarters of grain from the supply, and that country enjoyed a stipply of grain to a greater extent than arty other country. —There always would be a defect in any systent that freely admitted _ grain from States snore favoured than those into which it was imported. This Country stood in a particular situation with regard to foreign grain at this moment. They knew that one part of the empire had increased her supply, and from that country he thought we ought to encourage the• importation, more especially , as that was not a • manufacturing country. He meant Ireland; and be thought this country should look to Ireland in the first instance, and nut, by encouraging fo. reign importations, interfere in the smallest dagrec with that country's produce. What losses, he would •ask, had hitherto been sustained by the system of prohibition? What mischief had been the consequence of the Act of 1815 . ? for the Noble Duke had spok en a s if it h a d be en mis-' chievous. Let them look to what had been the price of grain ten or twelve years antecedently from that period:— When he supported that Act, he was told that he was erecting a Minimum of price, and that the country would never be able to enjoy grain ,at less : than 80s. per quarter. But what was the fact ? Why, for some years, the price .had never exceeded 655., and last, year it was 575..• Was that an unreasonable price which requited alteration by . law ? Did the Noble Duke wish that the price should be •under 575. ? Certainly not. On the contrary, he argued the _question as if the .preeent Bill would tiustelai corn *hove that ' price. A few years ago a numbet of petitions had been laid upon the table against it, but be knew how those petitions were 'obtained, and could get them in the same manner upon any sobject whatever. They generally added a clause upott•the 'necessity of Parliamentary lieform,(a la,ugh),—and on that of reducing the salaries of offiCers of the Government. further than they had been reduced, Ile wa s opposed,to such petitions ;- he had seen the salaries of officers of the Crown reduced too much for the, condition of the officers, a nd for that of the Governnieut; and if in his early life he hati concurred in a resolution .declaringthat "the infitt cpe of the Crown has increased, was, increasing, and ought o be he now acknowledged that he believed t there d v im ers i e nill o i ro ' :t proposition to be actually true. Re 'ports had been sent into the . liottse upon the subject of this which, after :differing much in .their statements, co dki in declarin g th at i t was i mpossible to recommend nn y distinct Measure to Parliament. A measure was in trodneed in 1822, but on his opposing it, that Bill bad b een ' found totally inefficient, and had never since been acted on. That measure had originated with philosophi cal theoiists, and had lieen•forced on Alinistere. - Some other measure more accordAit with that abstract theory of m odern philosopher's was now hrought forward, and be woultlonly say, that it wa.s one which did not come re commended to him from tlie . souree from which it arose,- - Row was it possible for the airicultural interest to go on, when, under the modern laws of thetie theorists, the dude s on foreign wool had been so reduced, that wool which used to sell for 18e. now only feCched 7s: 104. in the market ?„ A. Noble Friend of his had stated on a former occasion, that the great danger to be apprehended was, the frequent interpositicn of the Legislature in altering the law. It was with him a question, whether it bad not been the object of certain parties so to act as to make a case against the law as it now existed. He would be sorry to attribute any such objects to the Noble Duke, or to the Noble Lords who acted with him ; but he did believe that there were men likely to be led away by the fashions of the slay, in Opposition to their better judgments. He, however, maintained that it would be best to continue the existing law, leaving all exigencies which might arise to be managed, by Parliament when sitting, or by the privy Council when Parliament was not sitting. 'Last sear a curious, and he thought somewhat extraordinary doctrine, had been broached ; they heard talk of the comparative 'inte rests of the manufacturing and agricultural .interests. lie knew of no difference between those interests. The agrictiltural interests were so bound up with the general wealth and prosperity of the country, that there was no measure of general benefit which would not be of service to those interests. But it was said that a testing place was wanted for the agricultural interest, and it was 'pro posiA to give it by this. Bill. But where was to be the resting place for the manufacturer who would have to ap ply to a foreignerfor'his food ? would b;the rest ing place for the-decay of agriculture which such a measure was calculated to introduce ? Where was to be the rest ing place for the diminished home consumption which that decay would, of necessity, produce? The Noble Lord, after some strong allOsions to the arguments used by Lord Goderich last year upon this question, went on to observe, that that Noble Lord was mistaken,if he supposed he could ever introduce a free trade in corn. The Noble Lord might shake his head and dissent from that opinion, but he Maintained that it was true. Did the Noble Lord imagine that he could introduce such a ss stem,- when all the nations around us were copying our ancient trading system? It was preposterous to entertain' such an idea. He repeated, that'. he conceived it would be.most advisable to continue the present. law, leaving it to Parliament or to the Privy Council to act upon cases of emergency. Upon these Aot n ds he'would oppose the motion. Lord GODERICH—My Lords, as the Noble Earl has thought proper to mention me upon this occasion, and to . allude with some severity and humour—of which I do not complain—to the opinions I expressed upon the present question on a former occasion, I feel called upon to make a few observations to your Lordships. The Noble Earl, in quoting the opinions I gave on a former occasion, hai given them with perfect accuracy. I wish, however, to inform the Noble Earl, that, in forming my. .-opinions on.subjects,; I am not so much of a philosopher as not, to perceive that; in dealing with 'the interests of man, in all their intricate and complicated bearings, we must modify and, regulate them according to times and circumstances. BOt'l say at the same time, that we are hound to lay down some sound principle as the basis upon which we mean to act. And the question for your Lordships here is; whether that basis shall. be a prohibition of foreign corn, or the indirect' and Variable duty which is proposed to you by this Bill. This is the question you are called upon to discus', ; and although ' I diifea. from the Noble Lord as to the benefits arising from the existing law, and the evils to be apprehended from that propOsed to us, I . beg bins to understand that I never pre posed, and never supported any thing like an abstract free and unrestricted trade in grain. And although I have felt anxious that the laws and modifications' of that trade, which twenty-three: years of war have forced upon us, should be brought back to what they were before these derangements took place : and although I am no theorist or inexperienced innovator, who does not care- two straws for the agriculturists; although I am not one of tin* who are ready to sacrifice the best interests of the country to novel speculations—although, I say, I do not feel that I deserve to come Within any of these reproaches of the Noble Earl on the one hand ; so on the other hand do I feel that I ought not- to be reproached for wishing to, establish the basis of a free trade, subject, of course, to regulations and restrictions, where the interests of the country may require them.--(Hear.)—The Noble earl has argued this question as if its polioy was entirely new, and as if the law, as it now is, had had the experience of ages to recomm i end t. Now, my Lords, the reverse of this happens to be the fact. Formerly we always regulated the importation of corn by a duty. The first regulation of this kind was in 1804, at which period a duty of 245. was imposed upon foreign corn, beginning when it was at 545. and after,that, instead of a gradual reduction of duty, it fell at once to 2s. 6d., by which an immense importation might suddenly take place. An alteration was subsequently made, raising the market price to 635. but still keeping the duty at,24S. up to that point, after which it fell again '• to 2s. 6d. The Noble Lord went on to contend, that if they were to continue the law, which allowed the ports to remain open for three months after corn attained a certain . . price, every person having corn within the reach of Our markets would pour it in, as, if they did nut do scr, it might be long before such an opportunity again presented itself. And it was only by a graduated scale of protecting duties that such an evil could he prevented. The Noble Earl wished to have the power of admitting corn under such circumstances vested in the hands of Government.— . . t ' foreign produce ? He had never Mei with' any anew ,f this last argument. Why not Prohibit the impertatieli v - grain when it is below a certain fixed point, say o . „ r 645. ; hut, by the present system, the farmer was safe. The fine Dantzic wheat Na4:equal to that of Fc e and might n o w he imported t o th e inj ury.o f the P o i / groat er. Ire tebuld maintain, that the domestic agl iC tore was amply sufficient for the auliply o f the eumption uf the country; and if it were not, helregged t ,, House to consider that th e y h a d an inexhaustible gal' in Ireland. Lord KING was ,convinced that the present rueO g , was hot intended to be a final settlement of the tpreati °° ' and this, perhaps, was one reason why the Noble Lord o r posits had had. an opportunity of complaining th at ; (Lord King) had not indulged this propensity to antieil* . evil. He could tell the Noble Lord, that, a more sulota rl , e fiat reason was, that he. did not much like t o ,prognoati: good, nor to anticipate. evil, nor to deliverany-4V l °, whatever to a sl e epy audienc e ;—(A laugh)--not thatc h r House was, or ever h a d b een , or p er h a p s ever wou ld „ P . :l sleepy, when any questions were before it which cancer'', the personal interests of its Members ; but in the-preee, l ll l case it was of little practical utility to oppose the really did not understand the reasoning of a Noble opposite, nor could he appreciate the impression which Noble Lord had of the facts of the case. • The Noble w' had exultingly asked, " How could that be called a 11 1: , nopoly which was granted i n f avour o f a w h o l e asantrY,,, This was notoriouslynot th e f ac t,- for the monopoly of o '7, arid of the general produce of the land, was obviously gee', ed to on e ord e r of . the coun t r y ; an d i t not on l y Ana ae' all other orders, but it was granted as their expo 4, and much to their injury. He looked upon the Bill as e . far advantageous, that it repealed the Corn Bill of -181. 5 i When he reflected upon, th e p r i nc ipl es o f th a t Bill, ‘eltl, all Iris knowledge of Parliament, he. was most f o rtil' , „, struck with the impudence of introducing such a measure ill' the Legislature. The object of introducing that Bill 0 1.4 ' d to keep the price of corn as high as 80s. the querter, O L that whilst it was a s l ow as between 40s. and r eos.• on t" , rest of the Continent. The price of 80s. would have he t !, kept up had it nut heenfor Ireland. The -Noble Loid maintained, that the prices of agricultural produce oreli' to be kept up by Parliamentary measure s i n th e ra tio i taxation. Did the Noble Lord really mean to say, that in peoportien as Ministers increased the •burthens of taxatioPt they were to raise the price of agricultural produce. this were his proposition, he . maintained what no man; sound judgment could possibly su pp or t. lie atrou tell the Noble LIRA th a t th e ques ti on wars not so not cb between what was called the Agricultural and the C O . ,,We thercial luterests, as b e tw e en th e l an d- owners arid IT prosperitY of the c ou n t r y. Th e genera l prosper ity 04 chitcked in proportion as they rose the price of C0 ( ,,,* He was not a political metaphysi c i an , nor - a S cotc h pethw, cal economist—he would send all su c h t o th e d ev il.--(r langh)—if their science contracqcted'experience; but with" out any scientific research, it was not difficult to tell the effects of this legislating to raise the price of food. Th t Noble Lord (Goderich) was him se lf no t ort h o d ox i s this new faith; he was a heretic, a sort -of Unitarian, and Se parated the substances too much ; he was afraid to adopt the true faith, which eruhraCed the doctrine of free trader and many other doctrines not palatable to the Noble Lod or to many others in that House. He (Lord King) should' say, that the first article of the new creed was Free Te'l —the second, was against s.fonopolies in gen era l—the thee +-- was more especially against those monopelies which gave private advantages to any one class of the, coma - 10 4 Y ( to the prejudic e of th e re m a i n d er; an d f rom a ll th es e (°_, Which the present Bill was one ) h e h o p e d th e H ouse wol-d' be delivered. It bad beers held that the present m easure was nothing but a compromise. If this were the caw, li t would only say, that it was riot a compromise between the Agricultural and Commercial Interests of the country, tr ot between two parti es i n th e same Government.....-Mier'e) Lord MALMESIWRY explained. The &rl of LAUDERDALE denied that himself, or the Noble Lord on th e cross be nc h (L or d G o de r i c h), had argued the Bill of lSlo as a measure intended to'prothg e- . 80s. as a minimum price of wheat. Lord ,KING was awere of the manner in which the Noble Lords had argued the Bill; but he (Lord Kingliten not alluded to the mode of arguing,'but to what hirthee° really intended to he produced. Lord GODERICH explaine.d. The Marquis of BRISTOL said, my long and near connection with a Noble Earl now unfortunately secluded front public life, with whom this measure is known to hoe' originated, and under the sanction of whose name it Was first brought before the public, has made me watch its progre,9 with peculiar interest, and as there is no individual wbo This he. (Lord Goderich) should certainly object to, as be would have seen with more regret any modification of it in thought, it dangerous and unwise to vest such enormous , , power in the hands of any Giavernment, connected as they . : necessarily were with the landed' interests. It would be anxious t i h t k o e t takewith ha id p e t ' hhilieisPri which e iP4 i opportunity t l' n ()ll. o, o v f a s h p ta i e p t e h i a n i r i much better to have a fixed law on the subject, and relieve the Government both from the danger and the responsi- candour to acknowledge, not only that the Bill is substan bility of exercising such a power. The Noble Earl had tiallv the same as the one proposed by Lord Liverpool , objected to the various "changes made in the Corn Laws, but that the alterations in the of duties are prat: , and in the price of corn at different ti mes , an d h a d taunte d. the scale Ministers with being the cause of those chang es ; b u t the ' ical improv e m en ts, an d t en d to secure more regu" Noble Earl appeared to forget die period at which the Ik•siipPlies .and . less fluctuating prices. Whatever aif greafest fluctuations took place. Most of the Noble Lords fereneeof ' opinion, however, may prevail as to the who heard him would bear in mind that the greatest flue- inea§tirO' itself, all must, I think, agree that the tuations in the price of grain had taken pl ace s i nce th e i n - frequent debates upon this subject, and th e l ong a ttention j troduction of the Noble Earl's Bill in 1815.—(Hear.) It would be idle tq expect that they could frame any law for it is notorious that all classes now take af a r j u ster vie"' which would altogether pr e v en t fl uc t ua ti ons i n th e p r i ce o f grain, and keep it at a steady price ; no law could effect of the question than they did last year. I feel confiden t that object.' But the law now proposed would, in his that, notwithstanding every attempt to set one ball of opinion, go far teeeffect that object ; and more they could the country in hostile array against the other - half , : not expect. The Noble Earl, in allusion to the v a ri ous , . we mall all of us come out of these ,discussirn s . changes which had been made in the commercial inter course of the country, had imputed certain notions and ime merchants, manufacturers, and agriculturists,-with a t.ftli er ' pressions to those by whom these changes were introduced. knowledge of our true interests, and with kinder feeling` • It was easy to ittribute motives, and cast imputations towards each other ; . 'Sbove all, with a constant recelleetin° upon piddle men, but he denied that either he or that no one of the great national classes of society es" his colleaeues had been actuated by any such nto- ever profit by the depression of another of those 'Oyes. 'The Noble Earl had found fault with what had clastes ; and with a growing conviction which will, 1 taken pla're unde'r the warehousing system; now it should hope, take root in the -mist& of every farmer, and eVerY be recollected that the warehousing system took place in manufacturer in England, that .farmers and manufacnirer e 1822, and upon what ground was it proposed ? .It was are not rivals, but partners in one great firm, and thrive proposed on these grounds: The corn was imported into by each other's prosperity. Nothing can be more t lO this country under the old law, and upon the faith of that founded than the idea that landlords have any particular . lain; and Parliament having thought proper to alter that interest in this. question. The author of the " Wealth law, it was then thought right that this property ought of Nations" has expressed his opinion on this subject iu • not to be destroyed. This w as th e ground upon which it most decided terms, and , I will take upon myself to asSett, was allowed to be warehousAl ; that . ground m i g ht b e that of all propositions in political econ om y, th e omit good, or it might be bad, but whether the one or the other, certain ie this, - that the interests of landlords ' are it was impossible thot the Government could have beea ac- resolutely identified with the genera; interests of the coup' t. g tuated by the . motives attributed to th e re by th e Noble try. Landlords :have no ister es t i n hi g h pr i ces; high - Lord. He had last year delivered his opinions upon this p rices raise rent s nominally and in appearance, but renteo ) subject so fully, 'that he felt it - unnecessary to take up the can only he raised, largely, pe rmanent l y , and beneficially to there of their Lordships in re ca pitulating them. It was uslir . 4 landlords by one o f two causes; both of which are e I,u stt : li m e u ie r n e t . of fo l r a l t tit y n et to le h a a d d d, bee th n at sa t n b c c ti s o e n c e o d ed by re t a h t e lii i r i g ,a j o , f ay t i l i te important -t o the prosperity of all . other' c lasses lst, by improvements in agriculture, which increase , not his ioteu- proved. an&extended markets' /Crow markets are princi° i of their Lordship?. He did not deny that there existed the surplus produce of the country; and secondly, by ins' i t i h n e to m th ea em ur a e ; : tfi l a t t ho n u io g n b w i n t t. was He said now, as pally extended and improved by the continual growth and first occasion, that 'be supported this urea- increase of large towns within Our own empire, '4n thief wished the law to be settled. The greatest rich and • prosperous by thriving manu`factures. The and always had arisen, from an un- best job then for the landlord'is the prosperity of trade si o nit 'b iujeoi j ii. ise e s: e ilti t :d ;o ecfe l oa i n ti munts t euet a iis.,ltepauri, e, settled state of the price . of grain. He repeated that no in all ha branches, as• tliti best job for trade is law could settle the price of corn.;- but they were bound to a prosperous state of agriculture. What the poor man really '' derive all that could be expected from inquiry and fair rea- wants, what true philantlarapP • seeka to secure to him, i. • son. - Taking this view of the question, be felt b oun d t o no t c h ea p b rea d, b u t p l en t y o f i t . • Th e pr i ce o f f oo d is n•-' support the motion. He felt ,ittianeceesaty to, reply -to. question of . sect - Mtlary importance - either to the gr ovter . what had been 'Stated by the Noble Earl, on the .dittlturitv or the consumer ; ' for whatever the price is, all bar' ~. of Varro and Colon - 10a, of the f o rmer stateof Rome and gaMs . and transactions will be _regulated .accordingly'" :' its provinces, as he did not consider' itity any means a ease The principal- of vital imeortance is.. this, that the in point. Nothing could he more different th an t h e pre- soil of the empire should in :all average seasons fee 4 • sent state of Europe from its former state Of.marshes and the inhabitants. and 11On, this principal you cannotde' forests. tfe trusted tbe Bill before their Lord Ships would 'part without injury to ever y class in the community, 14 f . '. fix the basis of our corn trade on a firm and stable footing. you . cannot depart from it to any - consider a bl e e xtenv The Earl of MALMESBURY • would• Observe, that the tvithout ProdUCing great fluctuation in . the price of corn."' . • Noble Lord on the cross-bench appeared to h ave miatalcen an alarming uncertainty in the supply of it—without allusion made by th e Noble Earl- opposite as to the Undermining the most solid foundation of all wealth, an d former state o f R ome . If h e understood the Noble Eatl, wi t ho u t really en deagering your.. i n d epen d ence as a Ina all he meant to say was, that the 'policy of the Romans in lion. It `is not ae a landlord but as an E ng li s h man that compelling their di s t an t an d newly conquered provinces to I feel anxiety on thi s subject ; . and . I never will a t - furnish corn fo r th e ca pit a l, h a d the effect of destroviog all an Erigliehmeit con s ent to raise up new Itiancheste s agriculture in the home provinc es ; an d thi s t h e N o ble an d ne w Biiiiiingharns in every . corner o f t h e coun t r y, Viscount w ou ld, u pon referring to history; find to be the and leave then' to be fed by precarious supplies drawn , fact. If so, then, he contended, that th e com p ar i son was from distant countries over which we hav e n o c ontrol , perfectly applicable. He for one f e l t th e great importance an d.raised by a foreign yeontawy who - ,,contribute notbig • of the question before their Lordships ; he had ever h e ld to the pea c e , order, and well being of the communitY' - . the opinion, that up to a certain p o i n t a p ro hibiti on o f th e The Bill on the table gives sufficient securiti es against imfaiiiiittorioTeurn ought to exist ; a nd he con f esse d, , that too great a depe n d ence on fore i gn corn ; 11 shall therefOre.vo te if he entertained that -opinion bef ore , h e was muc h for it; but I assure the fri e nds ofagricult u r e , th a t if I did not strengthened in it by the exp er i e nc e o f th e p as t year. A think those s ecur i t i es adequate to t h at object, I should not " Right Hon. Gentleman who b a d d e v o t e d muc h time to support this Bill, notwithstanding the an xi e ty I f e d to vot e the subject, and - who was known to have deeply studied, for a measure originally ads - orated by Lord Liverpool; an d it, had proposed a certain scale o f d u ti es l as t y ear , in which to see ad o p te d b y P ar li ament t hi s l ast recommendat i on of he stated that there required a protecting duty of 245. Od. a Statesman, ei,ho, - as long as singienees of heart, sioceritYs on the scale at which his prot ec ti on com menced. That fairness, integrity, .and moderation are virt ues , peculisrlY measure was not adopted, and thi s y ea r the flight Non. dear t o th e peop l e o f thi s grea t emp i re , will live in their Gentlemanfound that lie was wrong, and felt it nec e24 ary to hearts cherished and revered, as be w ill d o i n m i ne , to the , retrace his steps. Ile approved of the present Bill Upon I last moment of my existence. one point-:-that it would tend to e stablish iii this country it , Earl STANIIOPE contend e d th a t th e agr i cu lture' of ' state of independence as to the . su pply of the prine i i y'a 1 .... i the country had always flourished, und er a s y s t em of prohi tides of subsistence. The language of the Legisleture to i bition. The Noble Lord stated, that disapproving of the the producers ought to be, "we give you ti:e e.. insive 1 ous principles upon which the Bill was founded, he should supply of the market, so long as you produce thost ;rtidel I move that the Bill he read this day six months, in order which are wanted et reaearie toe prices; but when i!at price - that be might enter his protest against it. gets beyond th a t, y ou mee t allow ;es to (helve son . assist - f .. Lord ELLEN BOROUGH felt - Confident that Govern ance from th e f ore i gn g rowers." Wax it nut pc 'able tip ment c o uld not have offered u Bill fiemdcd on 1,4 p!ln accomplish such an object by permitting the adin:,siun of ciple except that so generally approved of by the 1.08"34- LI'S DUI Barley., lar oit :u i l l e e hee red t latt boe t f : t o e: y m: a . e e r a ff:., „ r ~,,,,,,,:34;:,,,, ~,,,i , ,, ,, , ,, ,ot,oi:tiafeftut i wiittt o o lvphdieTlha. a yei tyrnth v h. htph e eeite, i a ilsoi, dopi,tfepiratytwr prod sthiuis. a e sla(i 1 groat part. Ile If their Lordship P r oceed e d, of a ' th9 Y to go? TI "gebt any othe w , ao, that it ocem ' th iott when the mar ket, k:ti,:bned read tliu .„_ The great — "wed the int: f t ro tected the con was clear that ..." M against it. Wit co of that 4 " 4l ring and a.gri Prod ilee. • Lord 31ALME ay Lord-REDES] 00coliptctf0:.ltd6hure l c, p ehlu, e ,dsaii c ip.ied u ,pde l eu a crn t o : rt o ain n oinicc it ,_ He wished 1-",."ing, what is I° the of politica - *Nue of the coo rtibtiigti.4t e :oi .ieznce ri i iii d ,:dtcoliDuudl ‘ uv r uettulayry a ,li,vd, s ., eprt t ot,oon l lorr i ,llef e :t.ja c ,, f ti.itl l PT ty r t ' , on to warehow kat.] ii . ._ 44 true, as the 17,Inessure oflast ond 1 , l ii o y favoured. ". When the h 4 rtd, it appeared f t 'tettion so high. ' il e teil to the mode t c To inany comp _ ,uvllght would nut dq atltaZU. The : 4 'onald e an d nu ll ;,,,', 'll thud as pnsAilt.i , ,tlgl,t into Ole n t. me entered at h1, 13 d. ; but, on t' then 4 be brought 7 l vareliouses • t heir Lordships Contents— Nun-couter. 11 was orci 'Voartied, at Te ROUSE ti_Nt 'soon its the Z 4o h*. T. P. Cot irg 4 his re-elec president o 1 4rd. G. LEN L-14Ittotis of Chi ( li fftarded to the mkt. `'YODEL Z lt eeb .41. • Caerni ar ........ • BENET' '76 kr LOTT bitnn Pi tg of . Agricult roster, in favi i SMIT fa r ithabiti o f cc Sing Abolition g i VIVIA cuit ants o f Ca Non to the Gil th„ i l R. VIVIA 4f e klnt e pl ace , p r 'oreigr, wool. te, k 6 DARN I 41'4 memorials 1/4,,,rewsbury and Zk blishrnent of to I )oblin.. k e 'olon e l W ILS th:Olarits and inh IkVtetilation of ki47.I4IDDE L 1. 1 4,7 18 and Colli Or of the issue 1 10, 4 1 ALTHO] tit, til q the Session Ile , ti ext y ear , t h e li,t:ttrati on Bill, e t nraitted this thOrtl poU tik h ', 4 habi tants of lif, 4 tion of Sma C f the in h a bi tan 4ki KNATI Le h the i n h a bi tai oe! Protecting ' h t he inhabitan ether prOtect i Pi 'Wool. '14411. Alderman V the inhabitant 4'4 might not IqIL 7VVILSC koi° n ad eompl a i t 01. !(t_ C , BURR: .t was much RS • m uc h f jt`itibt as for the estal4is t th e ntc essi t , 7ets;tp tne l drgn tc r a , :il : 1 : 10 t) at.) was then o \ ' A t'. LEWIS 14'lltlinat the Al VG% RID. ‘‘ e lle7upon-Ty lt STEW ;icin' and N GRANT of Ross tl irE R t , GUSS ti,Nlntal of S o L 44 e thought., tax on th t , , o h , ' , ANEDN 4.,L414,11 ~ 4 ,s so gem r.the H, 4 1t, pg the whol e 7:ROUss, eta BUPRI •Jet —lr no 1 L yon pthe wooll lirteign We t rklc e A RING sa att e „ 4 . Specific e t' s1(1 of th 1,%', 1 1 4 thus intr :1 1v a duty 'it ut erial, th tb e , at call' '"own that 1 isinterestwh i.. ,•~