The Sun. — London, England, 1819-09-15 00:00:00

'COURT OF Al.,;)BilitlEN. A Court of Aldermen was, hell yesterday,. at - which the. Lon° MAYOR presided ; gild the. Alder `men prefaent were—Sir Wm. Curtis, Bart. Sir J. Earner, Karr. Sir James Shao, 1.1-“. t. J. J. Smith, Esq, C. Smith, F,sq. Sir \Vw. .I.)omvilie. - George. Set,o!ey, Matthew Wow!, Esq. G. liridgeS, Esq. Wm. 1-Tey2Hte, Esq. R. A. Cox, .11:•qiUnbert Waithmati, Esq. and Richard Roth- E,9.. Air. Alderman Rothwell entered into the usual leenemizanees to nerve the (Aire of Sheriff. The regular business of the Court having been gone through, llr. Allertnan.SCFlol.BY rose, and in short speerh, propose:l a hi t :lily flattering Vote of Thanks to the Right lion. the Lord M'ayot, for his great care and activity in preserving tie peace of 'he City on the occasion of the late Meetings in Smithfield. Mr. Aldralnan NoTt-twrit. thought the propos ed vote by no means adequate to th e o e ea , l i on , and not sotlicicntiv expressive of the high sense the Court molt feel of ihe wisdom and vigour ex hibited by his Lordship on the occasion alluded to, and proposed a more highly complimentary Resolution, in which his Lorthhip wai•partien holy tbaolied for the decisive measure of causing the Hrtest of llarrison, dining the lime the Meet- Lie was assembled. , Sir Jimes SHAW thought, as there was likely to be much difference of opinion as to the word ing of each of the Resolutions, it would be much better to adopt the- middle course, and propose such a Vo e of Thanks as every Member of the Court could concur in, as a moderate Vote of Thanks, carried unanimously, would be much more complimentary to his Lordship, than one more highly coloured, and carried by a small ma jority. The Worthy Baronet then moved a Vote of 'thanks !cf his Lordship, for his conduct on the occasion mentioned, couched in - moderate but flattering terms-of approbation. - 'this was objected to by.the Aldermen Cox and litttnoEs, as not sufficiently complimentary to his Lordship, nor strongly enough expressive of the opini,n of the Court ; but, on being put to the vote, it-passed unanimously. . Mr. Alderman WooD desired to know from the Lord Mayor, whether any, and what steps had been taken bybis Lordship respecting the horrible plot for burning the City and murdering the In -1 which I►is Lordship had. communicated to the Court of Common Council.? and whether any of the Incendiaries, who, Isis Lordship had stated, held their meetings near the Guildhall, bad yet been apprehended Mr. Alderman Cox thought it quite disorderly and improper to make any such inquiries ; the cnromunk 01011 was made to the -COtirt of Com mon CounCil, and his Lordship ought not to be called upon to answer questions as to any thing that took'place iii another Court. Mr. Alderman WAiTotatAtsr contended, that the inquiry was perfectly correct and in order ; the fears and apprehensions of the citizens had been considerably excited by the communication which his Lordship stated had been made on oath, and it was highly necessary some ftirther explanation should be given. If there was no real ground for alarm, the feelings of the people had been unne cessarily sported with. Mr. Alderman WooD insisted that some com munication on this subject ought to be made , there could be no impropriety in't he Lord Mayor's making known to his brother Magistrates, in formation received by him on oath, upon a sub ject which so nearly concerned them all, as well as every inhabitant of the City over which they presided. [The Lord Mayor, however, though repeatedly Presses), both by Mr. Alderman Wood and Mr. Alderman- Waithman, maintained a solemn and guarded silence.] This husioes3 being at length dropped, the LORD MAYOR addressed the Court, and said he bad a complaint to make against one of the Ma gistrates of the City, for what he considtired a high breach of his duty, tending to disgrace the Magistracy and degrade the office of Chief Ma gistrate ; he then named Mr. AldErman ‘Vaith. man. His L6rdship proceeded to state, that his complaint against the Worthy Alderman Was; that after he ('he Lord Mayor) had disiolved the last Common Hall, the Alderman threw off • his gown, took the Chair of the Meeting, and in duced the persons assembled to agree to and p ass Resolutions degrading to him in his Magisterial capacity. If • such a proceeding was legal and proper, it was altogether useless and unnecessary to present netrivit inns to the Lord Mayor, as the Chief Magistrate, as the Livery might hold Coin mon Halls without his presence. Such conduct, Le conceived, would not meet the sanction of that Court. lie considered that after the' Ball was dissolved by the Lord Mayor the proceeding to hr . - titer business was illegal; that the Meeting was an unlawful assembly, and that the Chief Magistrate would be justified in reading the Riot Act. lie had alsd another complaint to make against the 'Worthy Alderman for his conduct while sitting as a Magistrate in the JOStice-room, at Guildhall. A fellow of the iodine of Stocks, who bad been an officer of the City, but whom he (the Lord Mayor) had discharged, applied to the Alderman for a summons against him, to appear and answer for his conduct in the Court of Common Council,' at a Common. Hall ; on which occasion the Worthy Alderman had tittered opinions degrading to the high olli,!e he now held, insinuating. that the Lord Mayor might be brought to answer before the Sifting Alderman, and in the Common Hall ; rcoo:nwending the fellow at the same tithe to - 0 1 1 P mace his complaint to the Livery at the next Co;,lnli - r Elan. His Lordship concluded with observing, that he considered such conduct de grading to the high situation lie held, arol had therefore felt it his duty to submit it to the judg ment and consideration of the Court. " Along altercation ensued as to tire manner of proceeding to be' adopted ; at length Sir WaL CuaTis proposed a Resolution, reciting the facts as narrated by his Lordship, and concluding with a reference of the whole to the Law Officers, with in,tructions to search for precedents. -proposition Wels StroDgly supported by Aldermen Cox, at. ;LC, well. Mr. Alderman Wamt MAN at length rose for the purpose of defending his conduct, and, in a speech of great length, contended, that the complaint against him had no reference what• ever to his Magisterial capacity ; that the Com mon Hall was a Meeting of the Laid Mayor, Aldermen, and Livery ; hut that as soon as,his Lordship directed the mace to be removed, and quitted the Chair, the Meeting was no longer a Common Hall, hut a Meeting of the Livery only, that he then threw off his gown, and acted in his capacity of Liveryman alone.— With respect to his taking the Chair, and in ducing the Itesolotions that were agreed to, hundreds of Liverymen, who were present, knew that be wished to have avoided taking the Chair, and did his utmost to decline it ; but he felt the duty imperative upon him when elected by . the M ee ti ng . It rval also naattl•r of notoriety that h e did not altogether approve of the wording of the Resolutions, and, that lie had been charged with partiality, and his conduct publicly found fault with for the disapproh..cion he had shewn. However much lie might have declined taking the Chair on that occasion, he st 11 contended the Livery, when assembled, had a clear and legal rialit to discuss their grievances in the Common Hall; that the circomvirare of lila being a Magis trate did not deprive him of the possession or exer cise of that right in common with every Liveryman, and that Vt ithollt his gown he had acted as a Livery man only. There was no necessity to search for precedents ; similar cases were well known and remembered ; they had been of frequent occur rence. Mr. Alderman J. J. Smith, who was now present, had done precisely the same under similar Circumstances. After the then Lord Mayor had 'quitted the Hall, he took off his gown, and act ed as Chairman to the Meeting that remained.— Mr. Alderman Combe, upon another occasion, engaged to do the like, and would have taken the Char, but that the then Lord Mayor had pru dence enough not to dissolve the Hall. Oa the occasion alluded to, the Livery had previously presented a requisition to his Lordship for a Com mon Hall on the subject of the New 'faxes ; and although, in different parts.of the country, meet hip had been held for that purpose, the Lord Mayor refused the requisition; end when the business was attempted to be brought forward by a snbsequent Common Hall, he instantly dissolv ed the Hall. On the late occasion he did the, same ; and if the Livery could not obtain a Com mon Han, and were denied the privilege of dis cussing their grievances when assembled, they were denied a right common to all English men, and, compelled to assemble in the open street, they were liable tq be cot down by the soldiery, 118 had. been done elsewhere.— He .was entirely careless what vote they might cluiose to pass ; no vote they could come to would degrade him ; he was-ready on all occasions pub licly to defend his conduct ; but if they came to a vote, at.the suggestion of some hot-headed Ma gistrates, with regard to the rights of the Livery, over which they had no cootroul, they might de grade themselves, hut certainly not him ; but he would ask, was it decorous for them, a close Court and secret' conclave Of Magistrates, to take upon themselves to call in question the right of a Liveryman, exercised at a meeting of the Livery at large? With regard to the second complaint, he really thotight it too coutetnptihle-for much notice; bad the Lord Mayor brought the news papers to the Court, for it was from them, he supposed, he had got • his information, lie would have shewn that there was no ground of coal plaint ; he (the Alderman) had seen but one re port, and that was correct. He had not theslightest intimation of any such application being about to be made ; the. titan. applied to him just as he wa& quitting the Chair ; he told him he could not interfere, but he supposed, if time Lord Mayor had clone any thing illegal, be was amenable for it, as well as another man, but that his charge would be more properly made at the Common Hall. He could have no serious intention of im puting blame to the ',Ord' Mayor, and treated the whole business aN trifling aid absord. nie Wor thy Alderman again alluded - to the for Mer charge, amid pointed out several instances in which'ilie right had been exercised by the Livery, and par ticularly to the case of the Lord Mayor TUrtier, Who, on Midsuntmer Day, waScomaelled to ethnic the right. The WorthyAldet man concluded with observing, that by depriving the people of their legal and constitutional right 'of dinsenssitig their grievances, they were driven to tnnitilturins•Meet ings, end the very evil was produced . Atli& was the cause of their apprehensions. Mr. Alderman J. J. SMITH corroborated the Al derman's statement ; he had taken .the Chair after: a Hall was dissolved ; lie took off his gown, and considered himself acting only as a Liveryman.. Mr. Alderman Wood declared there were - seve ral similar instances. In :the :Mayoralty of Mr. Alderman Seltoley,-- Sir Wm.. Rawlings had taken the Chair atter the Lord Mayor had quitted the Hall.. He strongly contended against any inter ference with the right. of the Livery, and particu larly reprobated -the - secret manner in which this business had been brought ,forward, without any previous notice; told•at.a,time.whenithe Alderman complained of might- have been unprepared to she•.v any precedent for his conduct. He observed that there was - not now is Court (Sir James Shaw retired before the business.earne onisiid Sir John Earner having, gone , to his: duty at the-Justice room), and he should break up the Meeting. While Mr. Aldermen. Wood , was On his legs, Sir Williatn Curtis had, sent out for • Sir • Johu Earner, who quickly attended the .summons. Mr. Alderman Weioo was greiitly indignant at this circumstance, and, persisting in his iutesitioa of breaking up the Court, left'the room, and 'was followed by other Aldermen; The Court was accordingly broke up, without coming to any de cision upon the question. §utcms.—Alis. Finiason, the wife of Mr.' Fin. Jason of Lisson-grove, Paddington, put a petiod' to her life on Ainntlay morning, by coiling her. throat with a razor. The deceased • had been for some time in n state of mental derangement.. An Inquisition hdY been held on the body. Verdict Lunacy.", A-nDbLEStX. gESSIONS, Sa Pr. 14. DISSECTION. Mr. James Luke, a young Gentleman, one of the Students in the London Hospital, was indicted for committing Nn assault on Mr. Chatles Roberts, a fellow Student, on the 7th of June last, in the Dissecting Room. Mr. Charles Roberts, the prosecutor ; stated, that the defendant and him self were house pupils in the London Hospital j when a miaunderstanding arose upon the disset tion of a body. He waa desirous, with a Mr. Parrot, of dissecting the brain, and Mr. Luke said he had been odd by Mr. Andrews, the Sir ! geon, that the prosecutor's skill Was not equal to the task. He saw Mr. Andrews, who disclaimed having said any thing of the kind. The assault took place two hours after. The defendant, in the dissecting-room, clenched his fist, and said he should like to lay both, meaning the prosecutor and Mr. Parrot, flat on the floor. The prosecutor said, yon had better not strike Mr. Parrot, for the law will protect him, and protect him also. The defendant said, Will you, Sir, and struck the prosecutor a violent blow en the stomach. Mr. ALLEY, on the part of the defendant, con tended that the prosecutor had done wrong. A body had been left for assection Fre.vions to the view of the . Coroner, and the SurgeonS, Iliad to examine the brain : it was a task too delicate fo a young man like the prosecutor, who had !VW' been more than six months in the hospital. The defendant had objected to the right of the prose= cntor to dissect the head, and the blow was oc casioned by aggravation. There was evidence wanting which might throw more light on the case, but, as it stood, lie invited the prosecutor to shake hands with Mr. Luke. The prosecutor said he did not wish to shake hands with The . CHAIRMAN, after pointing out the mischief which might ensue from assaults of this descrip tion among persons in the rank of the defendant, observed that it ought to have been settled by a proper apology withoot coming into Court. The defendant could not hut know lie had done wrong•, and if the Jury found him guilty he would stair(' in a serious situation, as the Court would , `be• bound to discharge its duty to the public. Mr. Lul,e then consented to offer an apolo l i; be said he Was extremely sorry for what he had done, and consented to pay IN. forthe benefit of the London Hospital. The coacession was received, and the defend ant diseharged. The Jtity . gaye no verdict._ The Learned CHAIRMAN observed,. after the• apology..was accepted—" I am tail the case is so disposed of, and I ii.)ttf.t yon, As far as my iii fluence will go, Gentictnen Otedi not he Oily, of this indecorum in a plac.e - which may be called a' place of education.", COMMON BROTHELS. Sarah Brown was indicted for keeping a c'orh inon,brothel, in Upper Thornhaugh-street, in the parish of St. Pancras. Mr. ADoLpuus, for the prosecution, state;!, thatt this_was one of many : indictments that would be-presented- against persons who kept. houses a certain dcteriptiun in Upper Thornhaugh•st rect., That street had formerly b , en occnpied by fami lies ..of respectability, :but of late years so many houses- had been converted into - bwmels, as to render the street almost uninhabitable by families of respectability. The house formiug.the subject of the-present indictment, was No. 30 ; it would perhaps be offered in defence that Mrs. Brown did .opt occupy the house;l it was It we the. de fendant resided at No. 56, in the same street, 4;,(1 that, the. house, No. 30,. was superintended by Mrs..Brosin, who was,the lessee, and received all the.prohts- and emoluments arising from it ; he should also ,sllptv that the .defendant paid the rates and, taxes, and was to all intents and pur poberthe:real.occupier of the house. Henry Ansell was called: Witness was a collector of . rae&in th'it part of the parish of tit. l'ancr;ie where . 'Upper Thurnhaugh-street is situated. tic hid received six months poor rates ; - he called at No. 30 ; from why he learned there he Went - to No. 56 ; he was told the money 'would -he sent. The,. defendant brought the motley to witness's house, to whom he gave the receipt. Cross-examined by Mr. ALLEY. ---The house was, rated in the.nameof Mrs. 'limes, for whom the receipt was given ; had never seen any im proper conduct or company at the house. Mr. ADOLP . HUS addressed the Chairman, stat ing that as a very material witness was absent, he would be guided by the Chairman svhether he should proceed further or nor. If the Court thought he .could not Proceed effectually without further evidence, be should not press it. The CHAIkiMAN being of opinion that the evi dence adduced was insueient, the -I _urv, under his direction, returned a_ verdict of Aquil4ll. Yesterday John Elisha, who stands charged with having committed a violent assault on• the person of Jane-Greenlades, servant to Mrs. Cur rie, of Upper-terrace,•lslington, on' the evening of the 6th Jane, 1817, by beating her over the het,d with a poker, so that - her life was despaired of (and for whose apprehension a reward °V4OI, was offered), was brought before It;cu, BIgNIR; at Bow-street Office, and committed to New Prison tdi Friday next, to give time for the wit nesses to attend. Last evening; about six o'clock, the neighbour hood of the Tower and St - :C r arberine's Wag thrown iolo 4 great state of confusion, in consequence of the appearance amongst its inhabit a tits of an.over drose ox; amused many and tett find some, until it precipitated itself trom Iron-gate Stdirs in to the • Th.rnes, when 'lnekly for the oWners of the beast it SOstaineO no'iojorf. The tide thew flowing very fast, threatentd'to carry the-animd a l way in its euit6it; and it wilt not until neatlli drowned that it WHS - drawn up,the so.tirs by ropes, and landed' on terra firma. IP caused much mirt . among the watermen, littbough one nearly paid' dearly for his ton, having hitt) chased whilst in' his boat teasing the ox, and totted by hi. feats to jump into On river. POLP:i3 INTELLIGENtk. DEPREDATIONS COMMUTED AT HUNT'S PROCES; SION. MANSION-HOUgk.—Samuel Hoffman, a youtls fellow, was charged by an elderly Gentleman named Whitehead, with having stolen a-Yaluabli Watch and seals from his person. The complainen g stated, that he was standing byfiisbopgate Chdrelia Waiting for the cavalcade of the Radicals; when be was titirrotintled by a multitude, and felt his Watch escaping from his fob. Upon looking towards the . Most suspicious fellows, he saw the prisoner witli his arm extended, having the watch in his Itantli and heard him say, " d— me, George, why don'' you take it A Lady who accompanied Ott complaivant laid hold of the 'watch, fol. t he bq who had been addre s sed f o r th e p ur p os e appeare d not to he dexterons at his trad e . The pilsont ,,; was secured and given int o c u st o dj% The LONE( Ma?ott said, that Monday vide Wee, a fine day for the int e rr u ptio n o f t ra d e a nd th# picking of pocket 4. If no other body o f GentlemenGentlemenhad to thank the Radical Reformers; theesttensire gangs of depred a tor s w ere c e rta i n ly un d er greatest obligations t o t h em f or t h e o pp ortun ities tvLich they w ere a ff or d e d o f try in g a ll th e var i e ties of their profession. The prisoner teas fullycont' witted for trig, fIATTON - GARtm4.—Yesterday dbraharrt a young ntan, who stattd • that lre.lived at No. 2 P , Fisher's-alley, Bell ane,- Spitalfields; was brune t for examination, charged with !deicing pucketL the preceding day : in the City-road, at thetitue, ol ! HUnt's procession. Francis Ward, a constabift. depoied, that on searching the prisoner he twilit' two silver watches, and a tortoise.sheil watch', Ord ladies' necklaces, two penknives, and otherarticiel' , then produced', which witness siist!cred the pri soner had stolen, from seeing him with . otherti ac" tempting to pick pockets. Two gerttlenien %di g Lad been robbed' of their watches attended, o ut! iinoked at those produced, but neither was tlieit property. A decriptimi of the watches was takes, down, and 'the prisoner was remanded for further' examination to-morrow. Another gentleman, 01 backer's clerk, attended to g i ve i n f o r mat i o n 0 1 ' being robbed of his pockei-book. containing: bank -notes to the amount of 2371. After describ ing the book and notes, he proceededAO Wnlshif el street to give the same information. l+om the LONDON GAZETTE'of Sept. a. BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED. High-street, Southampton, watth-ruaker, from Sept. 21, to Not. 9, at ten, at Ciui!dl4all, Loudon, ' BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. T. A. Minchin, VV. G. Carter, and A. Kelly, PortSim:nit /1 i bankers. BANKRUPTi. T. A. Minchin, W. G. Carter, and A. Kelly, jun. PoTts:, mouth, bankers, to surrender Sept. /5, Oct. 9; and `2si eleven, at Guildhall, London. Atturnies, M. Gretbatimlt l'44rtsruoutt4 and Mr. Buckle, Size-lane, BticlikrS 4 bury. B. 'Findlay and G. H. Findlay, Adame-conit, Cyt'd Bros street, silk-utanufacturers, Sept. 28, Oct. 5, and 46, at . *O r r at Guildhall. Attorney, Mr. Poole, Adanes•court, Broad-street. S. Rodman, Lyncombe and Widcombe, Somerset, quartl4 Woman, Sept: 49, • 30, and Oct. 26, at Vlerem; at the Yot", House, Bath. Att(ainic s, Nless Es. Frowd and Rose, Serle: l street, Litieolti:s lun, L0ti.10 , 3 ; and Messrs. Ctutwell Evans, Westgate-6161;1.1)gs, itath. J. Wright, Blue .Inchor-road, Bermondsey, Soul ho•ar! licen.e.d-vinegar-dealer, Sept. at semi,: 25,1 h% tWeliei' and Oct. 26, at e.e% en, at Guildhall. AtZustiey, Mr.:ut: l4 Ald,rutailbury-Postetn. DIVIDF.NDS. •• _ _ Oct. 5, N. Davis, Gloucester-terrace, New-road, White', clowel,,niereli-int, at eleven; at Gultlhall---Oct 6, R. wiggal Eceleston tenon al); Si. Helen's, .Lancashire : cotviti", manufacturer, at twelve; at the Gorge maul, Liverpno-I—Cre,"`, 8, W. Harper, Norvrielt. hatter, aLfom.. ;+-t,-..Nor,tolk 41 44 )1 —Oct. R, NI. Hail awl W. I-fail, Ki nlkstoti-upoit-Ho", woolleti-drapers, at Neptune Inn,shingqmi-ttpon-iliilfr a Oct. 5, J. Foster and J . Foster, •seiby, York, merchants, the .George Inrr, Selhy—Oct. 7, N,lioloilliard, \Vey:n.4lo, o eleven, at Guildhall, Weyttioutti—t)et. I I, D. Chettletnir?' , jun. Norwich, wine and spirit-thkreliant; at fur, at tlrel'av i° - folk Hotel, Norwich. c; , :wriFICATF,S--oce. 5. T. [.crick, Onisall, Notthigham.hite, rraltster—W; Williams, Tbro.,morton-strret, anctic.rreei--H. Spriicefr West ‘Vrattitig, Cambridgeshire, roaliket—J. Cuthbert, chester-street, Skragc-garde n., wine-merchant—Nl% B. Schl,!..' singer, Church•coart, element's-lane, indig o merchant Dawson, Wet herly, Yorkshire, ihnkeeper—J. Still, Sottt"r bland-place, I.lrixtun, merchant. - • ,•• 7 PARTNER:SI-11PS DISSOLVED.. • E. Tingl.e and C. Tingle, Sheffield, steel-refiners—T:.gic 6 " l ardson and K. Lano, Wylie llegis, Dorsetsiiire, Porfland'!.'j stone merchants—B. A. Sinotions, F. Simmons, and A Jadc, l l Penzance, Cornwall, m i lli ners —J. D. Laztrnhy, S. Prest',•lat"', .1. Beanies, I3tistul, woollen•drapers-4. S u th er l an d an d . 4 ' 7 lioundsditeb, i oppersiniths—P. Humphreys, G. : 4 Parker, and W. Wightnian, Nlansfield,Nottingliartishire, hitt" manufacturers—G. Bradstock, L. Craven, IL ("raven, and T" - , C. Porte, Flint, Lowthiati and T. Graham, Fdc". et er, linctt-drarel Mari euzie and J. Nlurrisun, Lon' dom. COntSE OF EXCHANGE, 'rum)Ar, Scrr. 14. Amsterdam Ditto, at Night Rot terctrun Antwerp l2 .sEx.Motlel .• 17r Hanibtirgli 36 6 If (.7• Altona Paris, 3 My's sight Ditto notirdeititX, ditto Frank Cori on die Maio Madrid • 351 Etreeti fit Ca li iZ 111!boa Gibraltar Barcelona Leghorn %Genoa—. a 4 —Venice, Ital. Li v. Li l l Eikcti" .46 —Naples Palermo Lisbon Oporto Rio•lancito Mil) 13j.....C0rii..... .per Ce!tt.. , Aglo of the liank liorrand.... per Cent. NIA1111IF.:). On the I,?th inst., at Larohr , h, Ste . phen Thomas, ,Esq'' Brixton hill; to Miss Jane Gil.}, r.f St.'Ca.heiine's-cloiste r ' Yesterday, at •'+t. Pancras, Harry Hunt, Esq., of ham, in Anne. el.!est. daughter n. ttie late . tiVilliam Parkefr of the A;a; bleiard, Warwick. DI71). nn the 1 ith inst., Mrs. Kighley, wife of Mr. John Kighl e /' jtuld-1,14te _East. H ' Yesterday e,orning., the 14th ino., at 1) , ,!r mother's 11 0 " 5 ~, aickoey. road. Miss Martha Toltiivo, third daughter of ti", lote Ni r. I.)otte'iMien, nt ci,,,,oside. Fehruar: I,st at Ascot in the East Indies, Miss LoUi cli o f Lichigaray, !isilig ht. er of flit!! late Samuel Liehigaray, E34'' Phil(;:i,rool;-house, La)!Oil, LONDON: Print e d by .1. B. CAIt.STAIRS. of No. 2U, Gr` af ()mood-street, Qitcn-square; and puillisbrd 1 SOHN'S, of No. 7, Smut. Niolton-street, at Tog `` t , N(J. trutit.l Adrettisemeati, Or dcf atc- (post-paid) must be altiressed. - 4' ;.. Te, In c • (4 • 4" ) :.,4 "ke h - 11tj the 411 e ..‘174. ,~ < ~~V'i z t&,l . 11; 1 th e '2lbr: br s ag g tim " - , , Co ea, by 1211, fit, It F. &c, 1) ; , }l3 , 1 ilj grt. /`tii of I : ) Ic . .s ! flirt h{ n! , 4hei t:tt c , irtit t prl•i •!tk ((,/, I, t . t Icl (.7 , /. •(' * l (. 1„.„' 17 , 1461, uy~