The Sun. — London, England, 1841-12-04 00:00:00

EVENING SUN SECOND EDITION OVERLAND MAIL. TELEGRAPHIC DESPATCH. The Indian mail arrived dt Malta on the 28 ulthno, and at Marseilles on the Ist instant. It brings no news from China. It appears that the Burmese had caused some uneasiness to the Government, but that ample re pressive measures were taken at Calcutta. Spanish Actives, in Madrid, were on the 26th, 31 cash offered. DEATH OF THE COUNTESS OF DURHA M. We exceedingly regret to state that letters have been received in town this morning, announcing the melan choly intelligence of the demise of the Countess of Dur ham. Her Ladyship died at Genoa, on Friday, the 26th of November, from the effects of a violent cough and sore throat of about fourteen days' duration. The deceased lady was the eldest daughter of Earl Grey, and sister to Lord Ilowick, and has left behind her sister to chil dren. The Venerable Earl Grey, who is at present at Howicl House, we regret to hear is suffering under severe indis position. The deceased was in the forty.fifth year of her age. HER MAJESTY. CEREMONY OF CHURCHING, PERFORM ED THIS MORNING.—This morning, shortly after twelve o'clock, her Majesty and suite left Buckingham Palace in four carriages, for the Chapel Royal, St. James's, when her Majesty was churched. Divine service was performed by the Archbishop of Canter bury, assisted by the Bishop of London, the Sub-Dean (Dr. Sleath), and the Rev. Dr. Wesley. There were also present, his R o y a l Hi g h ness Prince Albert, the Duchess of Kent, the Ladies in Waiting, Maids of Honour, Viscount Hawarden, Lord George Lennox, &c. We are happy to state that the Queen is in excel lent health. THE AGNEWITES IN GLASGOW. Yielding no toleration to the opinions of others, but en dea,Louring by every bigoted means to make others succumb to their intolerant principles, the Glasgow Agnewites have of late been striving, by every act in their power to shut up the public news-room of the city, which from time imme morial has been open on Sundays as on other days of the week, to its readers and subscribers. They had before attempted this annoying and intermeddling system at the Tontine Coffee-room, but on the calling together of the subscribers of that establishment, the Agnewite proposal was knockrd on the head by a majority of four to one. Still bent on interrupting the peace of their neighbours, they on Thursday last mustered their best strength, and made every effort to cause the Royal Exchange Room at Glasgow to keep shut up doors on Sunday,but their schemes met with as total a defeat as in the former instance, and in spite of the many shifts made use of by their faction on the occasion, their resolution advo cating this most saintly observance of the Sabbath mas nullified. and thrown out by an overwhelming majority, and when on their demanding a division the opposite sides parted, they were again :thoroughly discomfited by a majority of three to one. The cant of Sunday legis lation has hereby received a blow from which it will not speedily recover. THE . FUNDS-(CLOSING PRICES.) BRITISH FUNDS. sank Stock 165 lndia Stock . .. .. .247 3 per Cent Red. BBi 'Ditto Bonds 1 pm 3 per Cent Cons B9l ;Ditto Old Annuities ... 31 per Cent Red.. 9B Ditte New Annuities... New 31 per Cent 99a Ex. Bills, 1,000/....2ad 12pm New 5 per Cent — Ditto 5001 l2 put Long Annuities toexpire Ditto Small. . Jan 1860. ...... ... 12 7-16'Bank Stock for Acct — Oct 1859 llndia Stock for A cc t.... Jan. 1860. FOREIGN FUNDS. Austrian, 5 per cent.... Portuguese, 5 per cent. Belg,ian, 5 per cent Ditto, New Ditto 33f Brazilian 80nd5.......... Prussian, 5 per cent. Buenos Ayres, 6 per ceit Russian, 5 per cent — Chilian, b per cent..... Ditto, Metallic Colombian, 6 per cent.. Spanish, 5 per cent 23i Ditto, 1824 — Ditto, Deferred ll4 Danish, 3 per cent 79 Fren c h, 5 per cent. —f. —e. Greek, 1825, 5 per cent Exchange —f. —c. Mexican, 5 per cent.... French, 3 percent --f. —c Ditto, 6 per cent, 1825 Dutch, 21 per cent 521 Peruvian.lB2s, 6 per et Ditto, 5 per ce n t. SHARES. Bristol and Exeter (60 paid) ... ...... ... .. 27 Great Western Railway( 65 paid) ..... ...... 410 Ditto New Shares (50 paid) Ditto Fifth (4 paid) .. 81 Gosport Junction Railway (50 pd) London and Brighton (50 paid) 351 London and Blackwall Railway (25 paid) 9 Ditto New Shares ( paid) 4l 16s 8d London and Birmingham (90) Ditto Quarter Shares ( 5 paid) 221 Ditto Thirds (32 paid) 54 _ VICE-CHANCERY —(THIS DAY.) (Continued from our Afternoon Edition.) (Before Vice-Chancellor KNIGHT BRUCE.) His HONOUR disposed of several petitions and short causes of no general importance. TIILLOCH V. HARTLEY, The bill was filed to have an account taken of an es tate in Jamaica. The facts are already before the pub lic. The cause came on for hearing before Lord Cot tenham, just before the commencement of the vacation, when it was postponed on account of the impossibil;ty of bringing it to a conclusion. The arguments of coml. sel will be resumed on Monday, and we shall notice any new points of interest which may arise din:ng the hearing. - (Befere Vice-Chancellor WIGRem.) LITTLE V. GREVILLE. His HONOUR decided some of the points raised by Counsel. The cause is to be set down for further hel.r ing next week. TOMLIN V. TOMLIN. The bill in this case was originally filed by John Tomlin and Thomas Minter Tomlin, who each claimed to be entitled to one-fourth of the residuary estate of a lady of the name of Elizabeth Kelly. ~ Mr. Russell appeared for the plaintiffs, and Mr. Sharp for the defendant. Mr. RUSSELL opened the case to the following effect: —The principal surer in dispute was 5,0001., due from Thomas Belcey to his sister Elizabeth at the time of his death. Previous to that period Elizabeth and Mary Belcey and their brother Thomas had lived together, Thomas having the entire management of the sister's affairs, and the whole disposition of their pro perty. Upon the death of Elizabeth, on the 19th of December, 1838, administration of her estate was granted to Mary and Thomas Belcey. In the return made to the Stamp-office Thomas Belcey charged him self as having cash in his hands belonging to the de ceased testator, amounting to 50,6701. ; which sum by the expensee of probate was reduced to 49,0001. His own and his sister's life-interest in it were valued upon that calculation at 9,1401. 18s. 10d. There were a series of accounts kept between himself and his sister acknowledging her title to a moiety of the bond for 50,0001. On the death of Elizabeth he de stroyed all the amounts relatino , to transactisns between himself an d t h e deceased. Thomas b Belcey died on the 3d of August, 1832, leaving by his will the whole of his property , to his s i ster f or life, and after her death to Robert Sacket Tomline. Mary Belcey died in 1835 ; letters of administration were taken out at 50,0001., by Robert Sacket and James Tomline and probate duty paid for that amount. Shortly after mary's death, in a statement by IT Darling, lin who had acted as Solicitor for the I dec n ease e d a : ant his brother during their life it Thomas's estate was indebted to those wasa admitted be th that c, Matters stood lz thus in Mary to the amount of 50,0004 September, 1835 ; nothing seemed more easy than to adjust the claims of the parties severally interested in the estate. After some delay, however, it was sug gested by the defendant, Robert Socket Tomlin, that there' must be some mistake in the ac zabeth, Thomas, instead of dividing the debt equall had taken the whole penalty of the bond, or had tak en the whole sum of 49,0004 as due from himself to the estate of Elizabeth, when in fact only half that sum was due ; although, in the accounts kept by him after the death of Elizabeth, he gave credit to Mary for one half of the bond. The Learned Counsel read a document, whi c h was put in, in tile handwriting of Robert Sachet Towline, pur porting to be a copy of one formerly in the handwriting o f Thomas Belcey, stating that he had been mistaken in counts. It was contended that upon the death of Eli his calculation of the bebt due from himself to his sister, and that in consideration of those mistakes his sister Mary had agreed to release him from all debts appear ing on the accounts. Shortly before his decease, it ap peared that the testator wished to increase his property, and Mary, the trustee of the bond, whose duty it was to enforce payment had destroyed it. The account was not (questioned as bntween Mary Belcey and her bro ther. The whole defence rested upon the statement that the testator had charged himself with the whole amount of the bond as due to Alary. The object of the suit was to have it declared, that at the death of Elizabeth Bel cey Thomas was indebted to her in the sum of 50,670/., the case of the plaintiff not being prejudiced in the account to be taken by the act of Thomas Belcey. in destroying the accounts of the debts due from himself to the estate of his deceased sister. Mr. COLVILLE followed on the same side, and put in a number of documents relating to the suit. The arguments are to be resumed on Monday. - ATAL ACCIDENT FROM THE FLOODS.— TnRl-1 " 1 PtASONS DROWNED.—The recent weather has caused a general rising of the waters in all parts of the country. A most distressing accident took place last night at Coleford, near Crediton, the particulars of which, as far as we can gather them at present, are as follow: —The Rev. H. A. Hughes, of Zeal Monacharum, with his lady, his son , and a servant, were proceeding on the road homeward in an open carriage, but the rising of the wagewalrg having made the road impassable, the carriage swept away by the force of the torrent, and the whole of the party with the exception of the Rev. Gentle man himself were u nfortunately drowned. A millright's shop adjoining Coleford, was also swept away by the force of the stream. These particulars we deeply regret to state are but too true, and what renders the accident still more melancholy is, that the life of the Rev. Gentleman is despaired of, in consequence of the shock he has received, a nd his anguish of mind. The Rev. Mr. Hughes is a Ma gistrate of the county, and curate of Clannaborough. W e hear that the bodies of the deceased persons have been found.— Western Luminary. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Dec. 3. BLUNDELL V. BLUNDELL. The further arguments in this part-heard appeal occu• pied the Lord Chancellor the whole day, and his Lord• ship postponed his judgment. ROLLS' COURT, Dec. 3. TANNER V. ELWORTHY. The bill was filed by the plaintiff for the purpose of obtaining the declaration of the Court that certain lease hold estates were the subject of a settlement made Octo ber 11, 1783, and a cross bill was filed by the plaintiff to obtain a contrary declaration. In the year 1733, the estates in question were possessed by Andrew Elworthy, the grandfather of the defendant, and were estates that had been for a long period granted on lease. It appeared from the statements of the defendant, and from the evi dence, that these leases all contained covenants for re newal, and were f....0m time to time renewed, sometimes by surrender of the original life, and sometimes by granting a reversionary life to the lessee. On the mar riage of Richard Elworthy, the son of the lessee, the property was assigned to trustees to the use of Richard Elworthy for his life, with remainder to his wife for her life, with remainder over to such children as Richard Elworthy should appoint, and in default of appointment to the children of the marriage in equal shares. In this assignment there was no provision made for the general renewal of the leases, or for obtaining reversionary leases, but there was a provision by which the trustees were enabled to surrender the existing lease and to have a new life substituted for that of Andrew Elworthy. Richard Elworthy made his will on the 17th of July, 1801, at which time he had freehold property, was possessed of such interest as he was entitled to ender the settlement, and had procured to himself a grant of the reversionary interest. He was also in possession of other leasehold property which he held for the term of 200 years. By this will he gave a sum of 1,0001. to trustees for the use of his daughter, and then " all his freehold and lease hold estates" to his son Richard Elworthy, the defen dant, and in the commencement of it he referred to the settlement, and stated that he concurred in it. Testator died in June, 1805, and the defendant attained his ma jority in 1808, but did not claim, nor had his trustees claimed for him, possession of the leasehold estates, which were held by the widow until her death, when a moiety of the estates was claimed by the defendant, who had married the daughter of the testator, and filed a bill on the 27th Feb., 1839, to establish his right. On the 21st June following, the defendant put is his answer, and thereby insisted that the leases in question were not subject to the settlement. Mr. Pemberton, Mr. Girdleston, and Mr. Teed ap peared for the plaintiff; and Mr. Turner and Mr. Clarke for the defendant. The MASTER of the Routs said, that by the marriage settlement a partial and temporary interest was given to the testator ; and the first question was, whether, hav ing such interest, be could procure to himself a grant of the reversionary interest for his own benefit. Ac cording to the general Tale of the Court, it was admitted he cc : 1 d not, but it was said that rule did not apply in this case, because their was a special contract providing for surrender, during the life of Andrew Elworthy. He was of opinion there was nothing in the settlement that tended to any such construction, but that the interest acquired by Richard Elworthy, the testator, must be considered as acquired by him as a trustee, for the purpose of appointment. The next question was, whether he had not exercised that appointment by his will, and he was of opinion that he had not. He was also of opinion that there was no plausible argument in support of a case of election, and that the conduct of the parties showed that they under stood their interest in the property. He must therefore declare that the plaintiff was entitled to an equal moiety of the property in question. He thought also that the cross bill was totally unnecessary, and that the defendant must therefore pay the costs of both. An account must be taken of the sums received and expended, and the costs of the trustees paid out of the funds. VICE CHANCELLORS' COURT, Dec. 3. (Before Vice-Chancellor Wlonest.) LITTLE V. GREVILLE. The hearing of this cause was resumed to-day, and ad. journed till to-morrow, to hear the reply of the Counse, for the plaintiff. No other case involving any public interest came be fore the Court. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, Dec. 3. SMITH V. GROOM AND OTHERS. This was an action to recover certain property, pur suant to the terms of a deed executed by a person named Wyatt, in favour of the plaintiff. The case occupied several hours, but contained no point of anypublic interest. COURT OF EXCHEQUE R, Dec. 3. ADAMS V. GARRARD. This was another Special Jury case. Tho plaintiff was the administrator of the late Mr. Adams, the wharfinger, of Holland-street, who sought to recover the sum of 8001., a balance of account her late husband had against the defendant, as one of the partners of the late Limerick Marble Company, for his services as their agent in its sale, for wharfage, &c. The evidence was mere matter of fICCOV at, and totally uninteresting. For the defence, many of the letters written to the partners in the Company by Mr. Adams, in order to show that he was the person who took the initiatory in forming the Company, and that had it succeeded, and had he lived, he was to have been a Shareholder, and either Manager or Secretary—in fact, that he was to intents and pur poses a partner, and some witnesses spoke to admissions made by I-'m that he was to be merely a commission agent, and receive a commission, which was undefined, upon the value he sold. The Jury found for the Plaintiff—Damages 3901.105. 6d. PHILIPS V. SCHOLFIELD. (The plaintiffs in this case sought to recover 391. 18s. upon a bill of exchange, which was given by the defendant in payment of two pipes of wine. Mr. CROWDER expected that would have been as un defended cause. As it was defended it was his duty to lay the case before the Jury. The plaintiffs were wine merchants at Bristol ; they had an agent named Smith, who sold the wine to the defendant, through a person named Lewes. The bill was drawn by the plaintiffs, and given to Lewes by Smith to get it accepted. Lewes brought him the acceptance and said, " We have altered the date from the 13th to the 23d, because the wine did not arrive so soon as we expected." Smith said it made no difference, and took the bill. Now the defendant de nied his acceptance, because of the alteration made either by himself or his agent. Smith was called, and proved these facts. Mr. HumFaEv then called Lewes, who said the wit ness Smith employed him to sell wine for him at 21 per cent. commission. He sold some to the defendant at Kingston. He enclosed the acceptance to him, and received it back dated the 13th. The wine had not arrived when he received the bill from the defendant; he therefore kept it in his possession till it did. He altered the date two or three days before he handed it over to Smith. The defendant did not know of the alteration. When he first took the bill from Smith, he asked him whether there would be any objec tion to alter the bill, as the wine had not arrived, and Smith said " No." The Jury considered Lawes as the agent of the de , fendant, and found for the plaintiff. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Dec. 3, BALMAN V. GILMAN. The plaintiffs are Parliamentary agents, and the defendants solicitors at Norwich. The lat ter, acting on behalf of the Commissioners for Paving and Lighting that city, employed the plain tiffs to conduct a Bill through Parliament for amending and enlarging the local Act, by which the commission is constituted. The Bill was thrown out in consequence of the standing orders of the House of Lords not having been complied with, and this action was brought to recover the costs of the agents. The defence was, that the Bill was lost through the negligence of the plaintiffs, and that they were therefore entitled to no remuneration. The case occupied the whole day, the time being chiefly taken up in reading documents relating to the forms of Parliament, and the several stages of the Bill in question. The Jury at length found for the plaintiff, 421. WILLIAMSON, D.D. V. COLLIER, M.D. . Mr. Sergeant ANDREWS (with who m were Mr. Ser geant Stocks and Mr. P. Williams), stated that the ac tion was brought by Dr. Williamson, the headmaster of Westminster School, to recover 421:from the defendant, Dr. Collier, a physician Jiving in Spring-gardens, for the education of his two sons at that school. It appeared that Westminster School consisted of a number of boys, a certain portion being on the foundation, and the other what were called home boarders. The terms on which home boarders were received we re ten guineas as an en trance fee, and fifteen guineas a year, payable half obtained yeesnrelyea The s c h oo li ng o f t h e d3fendant'-s sons corn till, _ in 1838, and the payments went on regularly un .d til AT, maim e consisted of the 1839.T s h u e mo amount f3lt io n s o . w fo s r o t u h g e h s t ch to oo b l e eons . rig of th e two boy s from Midsummer, 1839, to Midsum mer, 1840 , los., the entrance fee of one of the boas, which ' timef o r the of c e o n n t v r a e n a e i e e n , e b e n o t f a D ll r o . w C e o d lli t e n r, st w an a d s o n v o e t r. p paid at the September 1840, Dr. Collier took his sons away from the school without assigning any reason, and (Mr. Sergeant AndrePwaYs the amount that was due. He u s p urP on ri i afterwards refused to ac tion defended. lie had looked surprised e cal as toan findundefended this action Collier hay' of the schooling of his sonisng ha p i rd for the early portion a of the demand. In additio n to that, the p r i nc ipl e sent a check for the sum now e l ' ,ed estati had subsequently post-dated, and giving a reason f or his' havingn that it was it. He should, however , call evidence to post-dated prove th ' tice of the demand , and then the plaintiff e jus would be e titled, in the absence of any evidence to rebut n it, to the full amount of the claim. The following witnesses were then called : The Rev. Mr. Bentalc—l am one of the ushers o f Westminster School, and have been so between thirteen and fourteen years. Dr. Williamson is the head master. Ten guineas are paid on the entrance of each boy into Westminster School ; seven guineas and a half are paid half-yearly, by what are called home-boarders. I wa s educated at Westminster School. Dr. Williamson was a Fellow of Trinity College. There are four masters at Westminster at present. The number has been reduced. Mr. Preston, the second master, managed the pecuniary concerns of the school in respect of the home-boarders. lie is dead. The two sons of the defendant attended the school, but lived at home. Mr. Thomas Andrew Rush, a clerk in the banking house of Drummond and Co., produced two checks, drawn by Dr. Collier, in favour of the Rev. Mr. Preston , the sec on d master ofi Westminster School, one for 26L 55., and the otter for 151. 15s. The witness also iden tified the handwriting of Dr. Collier. The following letter was then read from Dr. Collier to the Rev. Mr. Preston : " Reverend Sir—l enclose you a check f0r421. I hope 1 when Dr. Williamson and yourself • consider the matter, 1 you will discover that my pertinacity in sending my boys in the face of what I have suffered, is to be explained by my devoted attachment to the ancient institutions of my country, and that, apart from any compliments or civili ties from myself, I may expect your watchful attention to them.—l am, Reverend Sir, &c. " P.S. I have taken the liberty to date my check next month, as I told you, on their first entrance, that the portion of my income set apart for that purpose comes due about such period. I have settled bill, and if any further be forthcoming, I shall, on your recommen dation, be happy to attend to it." This having closed the plaintiff's case, Mr. Sergeant SHEE submitted that the plaintiff must be nonsuited, as there was nothing to show that Dr. Wil liamson was the proper party to bring the action. Dr. Williamson was merely the head-master of the school. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE thought the head-master was the proper person to recover, and asked the Learned Counsel how he proposed to get over the letter which the defendant had written, containing a check for the claim which he now disputed. Mr. Sergeant SEER hoped he should have no difficulty in respect of that letter, and proceeded to address the Jury for the defendant. He personally should not have been sorry if he could have stopped this inquiry into a very painful ease, by taking advantage of what certainly appeared to him a valid legal objection. His Lordship had, however, over-ruled the objection, and he must therefore proceed with the case, and at once tell them that the ground on which Dr. Collier, by the advice of his friends, and under a strong sense of duty, resisted this claim, did not depend upon any technicality, but upon a plain, broad, intelligible principle, that he trusted the jurymen, as parents of families, would understand and approve of. It gave him (Mr. Sergeant Shee) the greatest possible pleasure that in stating what Dr. Collier thought to be a case of gross neglect on the part of the masters of Westminster School, it would not be necessary for him to cast the smallest reflection upon the personal character of Dr. Williamson, who held as high a character as any one could hold as a clergyman of the Church of England, a gentleman, and a scholar. He did not desire to throw the least discredit on Dr. Williamson's right to that high character, nor to suggest that he had done anything per sonally that derogated from it. But Dr. Collier did, with pain and grief, and without any vindictive feelings, complain that Dr. Williamson, following the high pur suits he did, and with that high character, had alto • gether neglected the education of children committed to his care ; that their health had suffered from that neglect, and that, either from the injury to their health, or the want of proper attention to their instruction, his boys had learnt nothing, and made no progress at all in their studies ; but, on the contrary, that they had contracted habits of which Dr. Collier entirely disap proved, and which had been contracted, not under the eye of Dr. Williamson, but in the immediate vicinity of his house, in the precincts of the school; and in the hours of recreation had been subjected to systematic ill-treat ment on the part of the elder boys, by which their health had been injured, and they rendered incapable of prosecuting their studies. This question was not one of money but wholly one of principle with Dr. Collier. He complained that when the masters were informed of the ill-treatment his sons were subjected to they paid no at tention to the complaint, and that his sons, although they were well advanced in the Latin language when they entered Westminster School, knew nothing about it when they left. Both the boys had delicate constitutions, particularly the younger, and when Dr. Collier first took them to school, he called the attention of Dr. Williamson to the fact; and, besides, the younger had suffered from a fractured skull, and would conse quently require peculiar attention. Dr. Williamson pro mised that every attention should be paid to them ; in stead of that, however, from the first to the last, a sys tem of the grossest ill-treatment and actual cruelty on the part of the elder boys had been permitted by the master to be pursued towards these two boys. He should prove that frequent complaints were made by the younger boy to Dr. Williamson of his having been ill treated by the elder boys ; and that while Dr. William son, instead of interfering, as head-master he ought, to correct the bad habits of those undisciplined youths, dis couraged all such application by telling him not to come to him with such complaints. So great was the cruelty practised towards the younger boy, that he had a perfect horror of returning to the school ; and, after the Christ mas vacation in 1839, when he had left his father's house for the purpose of going to the school, instead of going there he ran away, and remained from school and home for upwards of a week. The effect of the ill-treatment on the elder boy was still more remarkable, and if he had died from it, it would not have been, as he (Mr. Sergeant Shea) was in a condition to prove, the first boy that had died at Westminster School under similar circumstances. But on one occasion the elder boy went home to his father's house in Spring-gardens dangerously ill, suffer ing from a concussion of the brain, in consequence of a brutal and unmanly kick by an elder boy on his tem ple. Dr. Collier, finding that his son's health was seriously injured, and that they made no intellectual improvement, determined to remove them from the school, and in September, 1840, he took them away. It had been stated by his Learned Friend that the ten guineas entrance fee for the younger boy had not been paid at the time of entrance, to suit Dr. Collier's arrangement. But it was, in fact, in consequence of an agreement which he had entered into with the Rev. Mr. Preston that that money should not be paid until it was seen whether the boy could, being in a delicate state of health, make a footing in school. Such were the circum stanses of the case ; and he (Mr. Sergeant Shea) trusted that, notwithstanding the letter of the defendant, the Jury would feel he was properly, from a feeling of duty and justice, defending this action, and give a verdict in his favour. A number of witnesses were then called, being the tutors and ushers of the boys, who spoke of the deficiency of their progress. Master F. Collier—l am the son of Dr. Collier, who resides :in Spring-gardens, and has a country-house at Chiswick. In 1838 I lost my mother. Previously to that time I had been instructed by my father and the two last witnesses. I learned from them the rudiments of the Latin grammar. My father afterwards took me and my brother George to the Rev. Mr. Preston, at Westminster School. When we joined the school we slept at home. We were placed in the petit school, super intended by Mr. Preston. My father told Dr. Williamson tkat my brother had fractured his skull, which rendered his intellects rather weak, and requested he might be taken care of, and not placed with the ether boys. Dr. Williamson promised to take care of him. Dr. Williamson said it was optional whether we had private tutors or not, and agreed that my father might act as such when we were at home. I generally occupied the first place, and my brother was mostly nearly last. We learnt the Delectus, Clarke's Exer cises, and the Westminster Latin Grammar. After wards we were put into Ovid's Metamorphoses and Fasti, and then I was put into the Greek Delectus, the first book of the Aneid, and Ovid's Epistles. I was in them when I left. My brother was not. We had no in struction in arithmetic. We had instruction in the cate chism. We mixed with the boys in the hours of recrea tion. There is a practice called bullying among the boys. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE—The plaintiff is entitled to the payment of the bill, unless you can show any thing wrong on his part. Why did not the boys go to their father's house in the hours of recreation ? The Wit ness—We were obliged, my Lord, to remain. We were ordered to attend the places of recreation by the senior boys, and they were authorised by the master. My younger brother was ill-treated hundreds of times. The ill-treatment was, they came behind him and knocked him down and struck him with the handles of the rods. I have frequently been struck by a key and knocked over the forms for fun. A boy of eighteen did that. I and my brother have complained frequently to Dr. Williamson, and he has told us to go about our business. Once I was walking up College-street, going home to breakfast, and a boy came behind me, knocked my head, and ran away. I was laid up two or three days from sickness. I complained to Mr. Preston, but nothing was done. My brother has complained to Dr. Williamson, and Dr. Williamson told him to go about his business ; if he heard any more about it he would flog him himself. I remember a boy named Emery dying. I have seen him receive blows and kicks. My brother, in consequence of the ill treat ment, could not do his lesson, and it made the school so hateful to him he could not bear to go there. After the holidays, in 1839, my brother, instead of going to school ran away. An objection was m a d e t o m y father being pri vate tutor because our exercises were without mistake. When I left Westminster school I am sure I did not know Latin so well as when I went. Before we went we had read the Delectus through, and other books, but we could not read them when we left the school. My father took us away in March, 1840. He complained of habits such as smoking and drinking, which we had acquired. He complained to Mr. Preston. Other boys at the school smoked and drank. Ido not know whether it was known to Mr. Preston, but if it was it was taken no notice of. George Collier examined—l am fourteen years of age. Before I went to Westminster School I had fractured my skull. No care was taken of me, but I was ill-used by the boys, and when I complained to Dr. Williamson, he told me not to come bothering him. I ran away. Mr. Emery—ln 1839 I bad a son at Westminster School. He is dead. I complained to Dr. Williamson of the general system in the school. Dr. Williamson complained to me of my son's negligence. I said it was unknown to me. I saw Dr. Williamson after my son's death. I told him my child was dead. He appeared surprised. I said you must hare known it. He was re quested to go and g ive him spiritual consolation, but he did not. I also told him it was a pity the boys were al lowed to go on as they did. He treated it in a light way, and I told him that as a Christian and a minister he ought to pay attention to such things. My son died of an in jury he received in the school. Mr. Gray—l livo in Smith-street. Young Emery died in my house. Before his death I wrote to Dr. William son, but received no answer. Young Emery was never well after a pugilistic contest in which he was engaged. The case for the defendant being closed, the jury im mediately said they were perfectly ready to give their verdict, and would give it now if his Lordship could re ceive it. The Loan CLILEF JUSTICE asked if it was in favour of the Plaintiff ? The Foreman said it was ; and, on the intimation of his Lordship that they could find it then, immediately returned a verdict for the sum claimed. COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, Dec. 3. WHITMORE, 'WELLS, AND CO.'S BANKRUPTCY. In this case the di v id ends declared the other day are found to ru n in the following proportions, and will be announced as payable by the official assignee in the course of a payable by in the pound on the joint estate, 205. in the Pound on the separate estate of J. Wells, 153. in the P ond u on the separate estate of E. Whitmore, 20s. in pound on th e separate estate o f F. Whitmore,band 6 5 . in the pound on the separate es tate of J. Wells, jun. his impossible to hazard any opi nion as to the ultimate dividends, the outstanding assets consisting of securities not yet arrived at maturity, of par ties seeking tune to pay their engagements, of any dividends THE SUN, LONDON, SA FURDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1841. payable by Messrs. Daintry, Ryle, and Co., of Manchester, and of the surplus of the separate estates of Messrs. J. Wells, sen., and F. Whitmore. Should the hopes of the assignees in respect to these be realised, the creditors will probably receive a further and better dividend. GARRY AND CURTIS'S BANKRUPTCY. A second dividend was declared to the creditors under this bankruptcy to-day, the parties to which were en gaged in the Baltic trade. The junior partner has filled the chair of the Bank of England, and was for a long period one of the Directors of that establishment. The dividend is expected to amount to between 6d. and 7d., and will, with the former dividend declared (2s. 2d.), make a total dividend of 2s. Bd. and a fraction, announced payable by this estate. The creditors will,receive notice of the time of payment in regular course. CRIMINAL COURT:-THIS DAY OLD COURT. TRIAL OF THE PACKARDS. John Richard Packard, Joseph Packard, and Alfred Kennett, were placed at the bar, and indicted for killing and slaying Michael Aungier. In our Afternoon Edition of yesterday we gave the case for the prosecution, we now proceed to lay before our readers the defence : Mr. CHAMBERS then addressed the Jury in behalf of John Packard, and, after expressing his satisfaction that the present unprecedented case had come to be tried be fore one of the Judges of the land, proceeded to quote Justice Foster on homicide, and contended that in order to make the case culpable homicide it must appear that what the prisoners were engaged in was nsalum in se. The allegations of the indictment were, he contended, not proved. It alleged that the prisoners did administer to one Alicha,el Aungier, certain quantities of spirituous liquors, &c., such liquors so taken being then and there likely to procure his death, and which the said prisoners then and there well knew. Therefore, before the Jury could convict, they must be satisfied that the prisoners administered these spirits to the deceased, and that at the time they administered them they well knew that it would cause his death. Now, not only was it not proved that such was the case but he did not think that any o ne w h o h a d h ear d th e evidence could for a moment believe that the three young men at the bar had any idea that what the officer was taking at the supper-table would cause his death. The indict ment then went on to allege that they had forced the de ceased to go into the cab, and had driven him about, thereby causing his death. They must be satisfied that the administering the spirits and the driving about caused his death. If there was another cause such as the administration of solid food, or another cause effusion of water on the brain, or another cause adhesion of the dura mater to the skull conducing to his death, then they could not final that the death 'vas solely owing to the causes laid in the indictment. In allusion to the answer of the surgeon relating to the danger of dinner parties, he would ask, was a personwho at the festive board induced a friend to take a glass more than would do him good actuated by any evil intention ? Why then should they assume such an intention on the part of these unhappy, young men. He utterly denied that there was the slightest foundation to suppose that there was any original intention to get the man out of possession by making him tipsy. Finding the man there, and that he wanted liquor, they all got drunk together, and then it was that the first idea of this foolish trick entered their minds. There was nothing in the case to impute to either of the prisoners a design to put him out of possession. Had they entertained any secret design they would have introduced some narcotic into his first glass of grog, and have sent him off in *cab, and that would have given them plenty of time to get rid of any property they might have wished. Had it been their intention to do any thing wrong or illegal, one of them would have taken care to keep himself sober, in order to take advantage of the man's intoxication. Had they had any design against the man, they would have asked the servant to sit down to supper with them. The whole conduct of the parties denoted the most kindly intention towards Aungier—there was no pressure upon him, no attempt to induce him to drink more than would do him good. The wine and the grog were there, and every one took what he liked. The pri soners had not administered the liquor to the deceased—they did not know that it would lead to his death. There was nothing more in the case than a kind of supper party, which had ended fatally and miserably. The prisoners had been miserable —they had met their trial this day for the purpose of vindicating themselves, and they trusted that they would be sent forth to the world re-established in the opinions of their friends and of themselves by the verdict of the Jury. Mr. C. 'loxes then addressed the Jury on behalf of the prisoner Kennett. He contended that as his client knew nothing of the fact of an execution being in Packard's house until his arrival there at ten o'clock at night, after Aungier had commenced drinking, there could be no pretence for saying that he was engaged in a conspiracy to make the man drunk to get him out of possession. Finding the man in a dangerous state of intoxication, fearing perhaps he might die in the house, they did what any other men would have done ; they put him into a cab, and directed him to be driven home to his master's, in Chancery-lane. Mr. Kennett left the house at that time, and never returned after. He was drunk when he was taken into custody, and therefore no reliance could be placed upon any denials he might have made while in that state. There was no evidence whatever to show that Kennett was connected with the medical pro fession, as had been stated by the Learned Counsel in his opening speech. If they had wished to get rid of the old man, why did they not take him by the shoulders, and turn him out at eleven o'clock at night. They might easily have done so. They had not done so, and there could be no pretence for say ing that they had any desire to get rid of him. There was no evidence whatever against Mr. Kennett, and therefore he confidently hoped th e J ur y wou ld acqu it hi m . Mr. CHARNOCK then addressed the Jury for Joseph Packard, and after complimenting the Learned Counsel for the prosecution on the temperate manner in which he had opened the case, and on his cand our i n a t once admitting the respectability of the accused, complained of the conduct of the prosecutors in not producing either the maid servant Jemima or Mr. Folkes, instead of relying solely on the evidence o f th e b oy P earson. There was not a particle of evidence to prove the aver ments in the indictment. There was nothing in the evidence at all affecting Joseph Packard, who appeared throughout to have been merely a silent spectator of what was going on. Mr. Baron PARKE, in summing up, said that in order to constitute the offence of manslaughter, it was neces sary to prove that the deceased came to his death by some act of carelessness or of neglect on the part of the prisoners. It was not necessary to prove the whole of the indictment to constitute the offence. If it had been proved that the prisoners knew the spirits they admi nistered would be likely to cause death, that would con stitute a crime amounting almost to murder ; but it was not necessary to prove so much as that. If the prisoners had induced Aungier to take liquor for an unlawful pur pose, or if they had forced him into a cab for an unlawful purpose, that would be sufficient to constitute the offence. If their object was to get Aungier out of possession, then that was an unlawful act, and they must find the prisoners guilty. If what took place had been merely for the purpose of making themselves merry ; or, if the Jury entertained any doubt on the subject, then they would acquit the prisoners. The Jury, after an absence of three hours, returned a verdiet of Guilty of Manslaughter. The prisoners were then sentenced to one month's imprisonment in Newgate. Michael Briant, aged 13, and Charles Donovan, aged 15, pleaded guilty to the charge of stealing certain quan tities of rope-yarn, the property of John Thompson, jun. It appeared that Donovan had been twice before sum marily convicted. Mr. Baron PARKE sentenced Donovan to six months' imprisonment, andßriant to three months' imprisonment, with hard labour. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION HOUSE. A ragged fish-dealer, named Stephen Berry, was brought before the Lord Mayor, charged with having stolen a lot of dried haddock out of the shop of a sales man, in the neighbourhood of Billingsgate. A porter stated, that, as he was passing along the street, he saw the prisoner walk out of the shop, and he, at the same time, observed that the shopman was at some distance within, and with his back to the street, so that a. robbery might have been effected without his notice. Judging from the cut of the prisoner, and the manner in which the man was conveying away a lot of fish, that it was got at too cheap a rate, he ran in, and asked whether his suspicion was just, and he and the shopman soon collared the prisoner, who, upon turning a corner, walked as boldly as if he had made the purchase. The prisoner said he had paid for the lot, and pointed out a shop in a different part of the street, from which he said ht had had It. The Loan MAvoa—Why, Mr. Berry, you often pay us a visit. Prisoner—Never here, my Lord. It's true I've been to see you in Freeman's-court, Cornhill, when I've jobbed for you. The LORD MAYOR--4 have seen yon at Guildhall Office. This is one of your old tricks, Mr. Berry. Prisoner—T r i c k s ! No, your Lordship, I never played a trick in my life. I've being doing upright business in Billingsgate these twenty-two years. The LORD MAYOR (to the shopman)—Do you know anything of the prisoner ? Shopman—No, my Lord, I never saw him before in my life. Prisoner—Lord 1 Do you hear that ? Why didn't I go in and pay you down tiro bob for the haddocks as they stood. Shopman—Never. You never paid me-a halfpenny in your life. Prisoner—Poo, pool Come, you know I did. All I had was 3s. 6d. in the world, and you agreed to let me have them for the two bob, and I put the silver shillings into your hand. Shopman—The price of the lot was 4s. 6d. to 55., so that I could not have taken so small a sum. :Prisoner —All' I know, my Lord, is, that the young man did tak e th e two bob, 'selp me G—d!—(A laugh.) But how could any one believe him? Why he says he don't know me; and I'm blessed if I aint been buying fish on him for years. There ! The LORD 111Avost—You sell your fish cheap, Mr. Barry? Prisoner —I do, my Lord, as cheap as any dealer, and as good, though I say it. The LORD MAYOR —You can afford to sell it cheap, for you get it very cheap.—(Laughter.) Prisoner —Why, my Lord, I got it as cheap as I can. The LORD MAYOR—Exactly so. 'Tis for getting it at so cheap a rate that I shall send you to the treadmill. Prisoner—You don't mean that, do you, my Lord ? The LORD MAYOR—You shall certainly go either to the treadmill or the Old Bailey. Which do you prefer ? Prisoner —I'd rather just go between the two my Lord, if you'll allow me.—(A laugh.) The LORD MAYOR--I shall save the trouble and ex pense of a prosecution, and commit you to the mill. Prisoner—But whatare yon going to do with my fish? The LORD MAYOR—The right owner shall do as he pleases with that. _ _ _ Prisoner—Then I suppose you'll order him to give me up my two bob. the LORD MAYOR—No. But you shall have your two months.—(Great laughter.) Ho stands committed to the treadmill for two months. Prisoner—That's hard, my Lord. I'm very sorry you put such a wrong construction upon the affair. This is a nice business. I'm robbed of my money kind my fish, and then I'm sent to the mill.—(Laughter.)—Com mitted. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. Mr. William Cryis, the landlord of the Bull public house, in Great Windmill-street, Haymarket, was brought up on a warrant, charged with committing a rape upon Sarah Stevens, the wife of William Stevens, of No. 1, Angel-court, Great Windmill-street, porter. Mr. White, of No. 2, Hatton-garden, solicitor, at tended on the behalf of the prisoner. The prosecutrix, who was an ordinary.looking woman, about 35 years of age, stated, that she had been in the habit of going to the prisoner's house for the last two or three weeks for beer, and occasionally borrowed a newspaper. On Thurs day, between two and. three o'clock, the prisoner called at her lodgings for a newspaper she had. Her husband was out at the time. She first spoke to the prisoner at the street door, and -,On her going down stairs he fol lowed her, uninvited, -into the front kitchen, which was the room she occupied. Ile shut the door after him, and asked her if she had any children; and on her replying that she had not any living, he took off his hat and put it on the table, and then seized her in his armq, and forced her against a bed that was folded up on an arm-chair. The prisoner then went away ; and in a short time afterwards her husband came in, and seeing the room in confusion, and that she was crying, he questioned her as to the cause, and on her hesitating to tell him, he seized a razor, and swore that he would cut her throat if she did not inform him of the whole truth, and fearing that ho would actually carry his threat into execution, she related all that had passed, and by her husband's desire she came to this office, and obtained a warrant against the prisoner. The prosecutrix underwent a strict and searching cross-examination by Mr. White, in th e course o f w hi ch she denied that she had ever given the prisoner any en couragement to take liberties with her. Mr. White, on the part of the defence, said that he was instructed that this was a conspiracy between the prose cutrix and her husband to extort money from the pri soner ; and, in confirmation of this, called two witnesses, who deposed, in the course of Thursday evening that the husband of the prosecutrix called at the prisoner's house, and offered to compromise the matter, but the prisoner refusing to have any thing to say to him, he went away, threatening that he would have him up before a Magistrate. The husband strongly denied this. Mr. HARDWICK said he had made up his mind to send the case to a jury, and he should, therefore, commit the prisoner to take his trial at the present sitting of the Cri minal Court. The prosecutrix and witnesses were then bound over to appear on the trial, and the prisoner was immediately removed to Newgate. HATTON-GARDEN. Thomas Lawrence, formerly head-waiter to the Pier Hotel, Gravesend, was brought before Mr. Greenwood in the custody of Robert Hambling, a City policeman„ No. 539, and placed at the felon's bar, charged by Tho mas Reynolds James, a one-armed men, under the fol lowing extraordinary circumstances : The prisoner, who was apprehended in the City, was taken before the Lord Mayor, at the Mansion-house, who referred the case to this Court for examination. It may be recollected, that, about two years ago, a plate robbery was committed at the Pier Hotel, Gravesend, whilst the prisoner was engaged there as head-waiter. Subsequently a man, named Rayner, a jeweller, was apprehended, under very suspicious circum stances, with the property in his possession, by George Collier, a constable of the E division, who has been since dismissed from the force for mis conduct. Rayner was fully committed for trial upon the evidence of the prisoner and Collier, who at that time was considered to be an indefatigable, intelligent, and honest officer, and the prisoner Rayner, being tried and convicted at the Old Bailey, was sentenced to six months' imprisonment, with hard labour in the House of Cor rection. Whilst in prison, however, he was informed by one of the prisoners that he had been concerned with James in concocting plans for the purpose of entrapping innocent persons, and charging them with felonies and other circumstances, which led him to be satisfied that he had been the victim of James and Collier, the latter of whom he caused to be apprehended and brought to this Court, and charged before Mr. Bingham, who sat for Mr. Greenwood. On that occasion, a poor simple boy, named Mickle, who had been en trapped, and convicted at the Old Bailey, attended and stated circumstances to show that a system had been carried on similar to the " blood money system" adopted by Brock, Pelham, and Vaughan, which excited so much interest many years ago. James, Rayner, and Mickle being attained witnesses, Collier was discharged. On that cccasion it was alleged that the prisoner Lawrence was eonnected with the robbery at the Pier Hotel, and he was apprehended on the charge of James, who, being sworn, stated that he was formerly a harness maker, but having lost the use of his arm, he now got his living by making horses' nose bags. George Collier, an ex-con stable of the E division, was c h arge d a t this Court on the 22d of January, 1840, with having received four silver table spoons and two silver forks, the property of Mr. Cornet, the proprietor of the Pier Hotel, Gravesend, knowing them to be stolen, when he was discharged. Mr. GREENWOOD asked whether the circumstances of the case could be explained to him by anybody? The Chief Clerk said that a man of respectable ap pearance, an apparent traveller, entered the Pier Hotel and ordered dinner, and whilst it was preparing he went out to take a walk. The table was laid out with the ar ticles of plate which were subsequently stolen. The pri soner, it appeared, afterwards came to London, and some letters passed between him and Collier, which came under the notice of James, who was concerned with Collier in the apprehension and conviction of a man named Rayner, who purchased the property stolen. Mr. GREENWOOD inquired whether Collier was not the same person who was suspected at this Court with dog stealing, when he cried like a child. He was answered in the affirmative, and informed that he was a stout big-headed man, who was always charging persons with robbery, and he was thought so clever and active, that he was employed without uniform to trace and apprehend offenders. He was now an inspector upon the Brighton Railway, which situation he procured through the influence of the Duke of Rutland's butler. Mr. GREENWOOD expressed his astonishment. James cross-examined—l gave Collier into custody. On the 22d or 28th of February, 1840. I went to Gravesend by Collier's orders. When I landed on the pier, I saw the prisoner Lawrence, who beckoned to me, and when I got up to him he turned his back to me, and held both his hands behind him, and g ve me a card, which stated that I was to go to Mrs Upton's, at the Sun public-house, New-road, Gravesend. Mr. GREENwooD—I caution you, that you need not say anything to criminate yourself. James—l come here to tell the truth, and if Ido crimi nate myself, I can't help it. After waiting in the par lour for half an hour, Lawrence came in and took me to the Ship public-house, Wakefield-street, and told me to remain there. I did so, and he returned in half an hour, when he asked me for a handkerchief, an d h e ti e d up a bundle, and ordered me to leave Gravesend by the two o'clock steam vessel for London, and deliver it to Collier. By Mr. GREENWOOD.-4 met the prisoner casually. He called on me five months ago, in consequence of Collier's apprehension and examination at this Court appearing in the newspapers. I told Sergeant Bren nan, of G division, that I believed Lawrence lived at Gravesend. I met him this morning in Thames-street, and gave him into custody. Had the curiosity to look in the bundle when I got on board the steam-vessel, and found it to contain four silver tablespoons and two silver forks, marked with a small cross. I took them to Col lier's house, in Brighton-street, St. Pancras. Went with him to a public-house in Rathbone-place, where Collier gave me one of the spoons, and told me to take it to Rayner's, in Crown-street, Soho, to ask him if he purchased such articles. He said he did, and ho pur chased the property. He (Rayner) was afterwards taken into custody by Collier, and brought to this Court. Hambling, 539, City officer, stated that James, and a man named O'Keefe, called and told him that they wanted him to be on the watch to take the prisoner into custody, and this morning James gave him into custody in Thames-street ; he was quite unconcerned, and walked quietly to the station-house. - Jellies here said that if his evidence was suspected, other respectable witnesses could be brought forward to confirm him, if the prisoner were remanded. It was here stated that a regular plan had been con cocted by James and Collier for the purpose of entrap ping parties. Collier did it for his own profit, and he getting for himself the credit of being a valuable officer. Several persons had been transported upon the evidence brought forward by them. This precious scamp then told a long cock-and-bull story, tending to implicate the prisoner, but which no one seemed to credit. Mr. GREENWOOD said, under the circumstances, he did not wish to send him to prison, but he would require responsible bail for his appearance. The solicitor's clerk said that the prisoner was respec table, and there was no doubt but he would attend upon his own recognisance. His father was butler to Sir William Curtis. The prisoner said he had a wife and three children. He lived in White Horse-street, Stepney, and now acted as an occasional waiter at taverns. Mr. Greenwood ordered him to be taken to the station house, and directed Inspector Penny, of the G division, to accept responsible bail for his appearance this day if it was offered. He was then taken to the station-imuse. The Clerk asked James whether he was sure to be present at the next examination. James—l'll be sure to come forward. They have tried to do all they could against me, and now I'll try the eause against them. He then left the Court. FREE TEA DE.—We are glad to learn that a preliminary meeting of the friends of free trade will be held at Eastwood's Hotel on Monday next, with a view to the formation of an Anti-Monopoly. Association. Con sidering the vast interest which Liverpool has in free and unrestricted commerce, and in its consequent extension, we cannot help thinking that her merchants and traders are a little late in the field, but it is better late than never, and by extra energy, activity and zeal, they may recover much of the ground which has been lost by de la?r, give additional strength and confidence to the friends of the common cause, and strike dismay into the hearts of its enemies. We cordially wish success to the move ment, and hope that men of all political parties amongst our merchants and traders, who are suffering, though at present in a less degree. from the same cause which has laid our manufacturers low, will combine to advance its Progress. LLOYDS' SHIPPING. - - VESSELS SPOKEN WITH.—The Ocean, from the Clyde to Calcutta, Oct. 21, lat. 5 N., lon. 22 W. ; Pilotin, Pondicherry to Marseilles, 18th ult., by the Duc d'Au male, arrived at Marseilles. Albany, Havre to Mar seilles, 12th ult., lat. 44, lon. 52, by the Oneida, arrived at Havre. Helena, London to Buenos Ayres, 12th ult., lat. 44 N., lon. 12 W., by the Helena, arrived at Helvoet. Catharina Johanna, Amsterdam to Batavia, lat. 7 N., lon. 12 W., by the Immagond da Sara Clasina, arrived at Texel. Echo, Hamburgh to Vera Cruz, Oct. 18, lat. 26 N., lon. 34 W., by the Aurora, arrived at ditto. Na thalie, Batavia, to Amsterdam, Sept. 15, lat. 35 S., lor. 23 E. ; Sourabaya, Rotterdam to Batavia, Oct. 15, lat. 6 N., lon. 20 W., by the Helena, arrived at Browers haven. Coral, Belfast to New Orleans, Oct. 27, lat. 22, lon. 56 ; Dexterity barque, Oct. 17, lat. 1 N., lon. 21 W. ; Iris, of Liverpool, Oct. 20, lat. 4, lon. 22 ; Mar quis of Bute, Liverpool for Sydney, New South Wales, Oct. 21, lat. 6, lon. 22 ; Ocean brig, of London, Oct. 22, lat. 6, lon. 22 ; I sa b e ll a b arque, of Liverpool, Oct. 22 ; Maria Somes, London to China, Oct. 27, lat. 10 N., lon. 23, by the Ceylon, arrived in the Downs. Agnes Ewing, Liverpool to Sydney, Oct. 20, lat. 8 N., lon. 23 W., by the Sultan, arrived in the River. EAST INDIA SHIPPING. Arrivals.—John Calvin, Abercromby, from Bengal, in the Downs ; sailed 7th June ; St. Helena, Bth Oct. ; Chieftain, Patterson, from Bengal, in the Doans, sailed 4th July, St. Helena, 11th Oct.; Ceylon, Peacock, from Bengal, in the Downs, sailed 27th June, St. Helena, Oct. ; Earl Stanhope, Tilley, from Manilla, in the River, sailed from St. Helena 29th September. Arrivals at St. Helena.—Harmony, Douglas, Oct. 7, from the Cape ; Susan, 10th, from Manilla for London'. Arrivals at Mauritius.—John Brown, Ruglass, Sept. 7th, from London ; The Crusader, Inglis, to sail 9th, for London. Arrivals at Rio Janeiro.—Sarah, Edmonds, Sept 12, from London, and sailed, 2d October, for Port Philip ; Achilles, Hart, Oct. 2, from the fishery. Departures from Mauritius.—Fame, Salmond, August 12, to Madras and Moulmein ; Patriot, Morris, 15th, to Madras. MARKET INTELLIGENCE. (From the London New Price Current of December 3.) SUGAR.-The deliveries of British Plantation continu ing on a large scale, and the arrivals small, have given importers increased confidence, and have caused the trade to be again anxious to purchase : a good demand has prevailed for all qualities, both for the scale and pan, and buyers have been compelled to pay prices Is above those of this day week for yellow, brown and grey sorts, in deed in several cases the rates paid are is 6d higher for mid grocery sorts. To-day the market for West India Muscovadoes ex hibited a healthy appearance, both grocers and refiners were buyers to a fair extent of all kinds, and the market being scantily supplied, buyers were compelled to pay rather higher rates, making the rise for the week is 6d, and in some cases 2s per cwt, and the total sales 1,750 hhds and trcs; for auction on Tuesday 160 hhds Bar badoes are declared, the lowest price of brown Sugar was 59s per cwt. REFINED.-For Refined Goods this week prices have been firm ; Standard Lumps at 81s, fair grocery lumps 81s, fine brown 78s to 795, and low to good 73s to 778 per cwt. Treacle, common at 26s 6d to 275, patent 28s to 30s, and golden syrup 31s to 33s per cwt. Pieces, fine at 74s to 765, good 71s to 735, mid 67s to 70s, ord 63s to 665. for Bastards stiffer rates have been paid, fine 53s to 575, good 48s to 525, low to middling 408 to 475. Bonded Crushed Sugar at 28s 6d to 29s for first sort. Loaves, Gibs at 34s to 35s ; 101bs, 31s 6d to 32s ; and 141bs, 30s 6d to 31s per cwt. Treacle at 13s 3d to 13s 6d. Bastards and Pieces at 13s to 19s. In Dutch Crushed Sugar the price remains at 27s for the best. Meunirrus.-For yellow sorts, buyers have been com pelled to pay a further advance of is per cwt ; fine yel low"at 70s to 725, good 66s to 695, mid 60s to 645, and ord 56s to 59s ; 338 bags imported from Launceston went as follows-black at 36s to 38s, low brown 42s to 42s 6d, fine 51s, low and mid yellow 56s to 59s 6d. EAST INDIA.-This afternoon at public sale 5,427 mats Cochin China were all sold, but at moderate rates; fine damp yellow went at 18s to 18s 6d, good 17s to 17s 6d, washed good and fine 16s to 18s, ordi nary 16s 6d, low damp white 18s 6d to 19s 6d, a few lots sound went at 20s to 21s, for good fair white, mid brown 14s 6d, good dry grey 21s, yellow and brown washed and shifted 12s to 15s. 3,000 bags Bengal wentt rather lower, the quality not being adapted for the grocery trade ; good yellow sold at 645, mid 55s to 57s 6d, low damp 50s to 52s 6d, mid and good brown 44s 6d to 475, ord 435, and very inferior 40s percwt. FOREIGN.-Brazil since this day week at very full prices. Bahia fine brown and low mid yellow at 17s, white at 18s to 23s for low to fine quality. Yellow Ha varnish 21s to 21s 6d for fine quality for export ; white at 26s per cwt. This afternoon at public sale 10 casks 35 brls Brazil were sold at full rates, low yellow at 15s to 16s, mid brown 14s 6d per cwt. MOLASSES.-For West India a good demand has existed ; St. Vincent's fair 255, Antigua good 28s, St. Lucia common 23s 6d to 24s per cwt. Bengal Syrup at 21s 6d to 255, and Foreign Molasses at 6s 6d to 8s per cwt. - TEA —The market has been in a quiet state, for Free Trade Tea since this day week, and some importers having been desirous to realise have further depressed prices id per lb for both black and green sorts ; the operations privately have been upon a small scale only at is 8d to is 9d for low common Congou, cash, good clean common is 9id to is 91d, and Common Twankay is 8d ; but Congou per Barossa, out of condition has been disposed of at Is lid to is 8d ; on Pouchong, however, the decline at the public sales held on Tuesday amounted to Id per lb. On Tuesday at auction only 1,800 packages were actually sold. Bohea at Is 6d to is 7d ; Congou, but mid dling rather strong burnt is 10d, but raiddling rather strong rough and full is loid to Is lop, but middling rather strong blackish leaf is 10d to I. l Id, strong Pekoe flavour 2s 2d; Souchong, middling black ish leaf strong Pekoe flavour 2s Ild ; Pouchong is lid to is 84d ; Twankay, but middling coarse, is 81c1 to Is 9d, good is 9id, strong bright leaf is 10Id to is lld ; Hyson, fine bright leaf, 4s 1 lid to 6s 0 ; Young Hyson fine bright leaf 4s 5d to 4s 6d, good mid 2s 84d to 2s 100 ; Caper 2s ; 12 boxes Japan Tea sold at the high rates of 14s to 35s per lb. Company's Con gou have met with a slow sale all the week at is 9id to Is 9id per lb cash ; the stock of this kind of Tea is re duced to 12,200 packages ; the deliveries during the past month amounting to 1,000 chests. The deliveries of all kinds of Tea reached 413,0001bs last week. To-day the public sales of Tea consisting of 13,000 packages were but thinly attended, the trade were cautious in their operations, and for both black and green Tea there was but a limited demand, importers, however, were generally firm, and buying in pretty freely, were enabled to support former rates, but the small proportion only of 4,700 packages were sold out of the quantity offered—Congou out of condition sold at is Bid to is £3 4 41, good ord flat new Is 90, good ord coarse and fresh Is 81d to is 10d, but mid burnt fresh is 9id to Is 10d, mid coarse is lld to 2s, strong coarse Pekoe kind 2s cid to 2s lid, fine Pekoe kind 2s 24d to 2s 3d ; Twankay good and fine, Is Ild to 2s 2d, mid rather strong is 9d to is 9P ; Hyson, good mid 3s 3d, good 3s 9d, mid 2s 5d to 2s 9d, ord is 10d ; Caper is 6d to 2s ; Gunpowder fine ss, good 3s 90 to 4s 34d; mid 2s 10d to 3s, ord 2s 4d; Imperial good 3s 6d, mid 2s 71d to 3s 2d, ord 2s ld to 2s 5d ; Young Hyson, fine 5s 6d. The total stock of Tea at this port is 24,738,584 lbs, last year at this time it was 38,206,000 lbs. The deli veries this year have been 30,635,963 lbs. against 23,430,356 lbs. in 1840 to this period ; in addition to the stock there are about 3,753,000 lbs, brought by various vessels just arrived, and not warehoused. Company's Congou moved off slowly, and closed at is 91d cash. COFFEE.—lmporters of British Plantation have dis played firmness this week, and having supplied the market sparingly, former rates have been sustained ; mid qualities of Jamaica in good request privately at 110; to 115 s, but in ord and fine ord sorts little business trans acted. For Berbice or Demerara few inquiries have existed ; at auction 20 casks Jamaica were sold, fine ord at 73s Gd, good ord 58s to 63s 6d per cwt.; the arrivals have been much less than last year, and the deliveries continue good, the market wears a healthy appearance. East India and Cape sorts have met with more attention, and holders have been less disposed to realise. This afternoon the demand was steady for home con sumption, and holders were firm. At public sale 339 bags East India, 68 bags 28 casks West India, and 200 bags Ceylon were offered. Mocha sold at high rates, fise mid yellow at 129 s ; West India was all taken in, the quality being unclean. Ceylon sold at full rates, low good ord at 67s to 67s 6d, ord 665. Malabar went at 50s for good yellow. FRUIT.-All descriptions of new have been in good demand this week at the reduced quotations. For new Fruit, Currants, Cephalonia an d Z au t e 565, P atras 61s to G 2, Denia Raisins 295, fine Valentia 365, rather tender 345, Smyrna red 30s to 325, Carrabourna 335, Sultana 50s, Muscatels 45s to 90s. Figs, Turkey pulled 45s to 755. At auction sound Turkey pulled sold at 42s to 58s, and damaged 35s to 565; Sultana Raisins sound 50s, and damaged 37s to 38s; Chesme Raisins damaged 26s to 30s. For French Plums 80s to 90s paid privately; Im perial Cartoons 105 s to 150 s. RICE.-Prices have been sustained for Bengal Rice this week. Low dusty sorts have been in good request at 9s to 9s 6d per cwt; lOs 6d is the value of mid white. For Java full rates paid. Carolina for home use at 28s to 36s per cwt. Saco.-For Sago prices are is to 2s lower; good Pearl at 23s to 23s 6d, good middling 20s to 22s 6d, rather greyish 18s to IBs Gd, ordinary Pearl 15s to 15s 6d. Ta pioca at 3d to 4d per lb. Sago Flour at 12s to 13s per cwt. West India Arrowroot at 6d to is 4d per lb, and common East India at 3d to 5d per lb. Rum, BRANDY, AND H OLL ANDS.-Ifolders of Leeward Island Rum having submitted to a reduction of id per gallon, has occasioned a fair demand, and 350 puns have been disposed of, 3 per cent. under proof, at is 9d; 8 un der is 8d; proofs ordinary, is 9/; I to 3 over-proof, Is 101 to is I Id; 7 over, good brown, 2s Id. J ama i ca has met with a slow sale, and rather lower rates accept ogno a good sm q a u ll a scale t only, and Is 3d is the value of proofs. Cognac, fi rst B rands, operationsed; sales of fine quality , 35 over- p roof, h ave been made li at 5s 6d. Of Demerara 60 p uns have been disposed of at3sli in for C 33 alc p u e t r ta c h e a n ir t •e , obveover u of p of the vintage of 1836, hhds at 6s, puns 58 10d; do 1837, hhds 5s 7d, puns 5s sd; do 1838, hhds 5s sd, puns 5s 3d; do 1839, hhds ss, puns 4s 10d; do 1840, hhds 4s, puns 3s 10d per gallon. G ener a at 2 s to 2s Id for common, and 2s 7d to 2s 9d for fine fit for duty. English Corn ' Spirits at 10s 4d cash. Batavia Arrack taken in at Is 6d proof strength. SetcEs.-Cassia Lignea at a decline in prices of 3s per cwt, fine thin quill at 98s, good 95s to 965, middling 88s to 90s 6d, low middling BGs to 88s, good ordinary 82s 6d to 84s 6d, and mouldy and broken ends 81s to 84s, loose and broken 74$ to 838 6d, and mouldy 81s 6d to EVENING SUN sioa 83s per cwt. Pepper has suffered a further dePreso,4 of id per lb. Sumatra good fair stalky Malo to g -El low dusty 2id, good brown clean 2fd; absr uys" brown 3id, and low grey 21c1 to 2id per lb. White t s' o 4:fd to 9d for low to good middling quality. r ill/ell r middling at 3d, and low middlint , dark nt 24d to 2fP e , A lb; Nutmegs 4s 10d to 6s paid for good and fine be!` e i brown Singapore, and 3s to 4s 8d for ordinary and, fi f : l os good sorts, 35 7d for fair bold limed. Cloves, an" A to Bencoolen at 2s to 2s 7d, and Common Bourbon Is 1... A Is 2d per lb; Mace good and fine at 5s 7d to 65 lcit to good mid 3s 3d to 4s lld per lb. The Ginger mar", has been in a dull state; East India has gistained, former value, but West India a shade lower; Jan ul li at 81s to 105s:for lo w t o m iddling; African singer b, 42s to 47s 6d per cwt. Holders of Cinnamon have 1 5, mitted to a reduction on last sales rates of 4d to 6d re , 68 TALLow.--Prices for Russian Tallow now ru le h oth above those of this day week. For P. Y. C., fc' r Soap and Candle making purposes, 48s 3d to 48s 6d h 0 been the current rates for first quality. For delivery it'll; to the end of the year 48s to 48s 3d, and for spring nl°1) ($1 49s to 49s 3d per cwt. South American at 43 s to 47sio for common to fine quality. Town Tallow has ine_At with a free sale. This afternoon the demand was Pu",., o t, P. Y. Candle at 48s 3d to 48s 6d for parcels on the °to and for delivery up to the end of the year. Al P u nd if sale 233 pipes 227 brls, &c. South American °— sold at 43s to 46s 68 per cwt. OILS.—For Cod .—Foorilcaotm3ml4 paleonFishseoalil4s2lthlios twoe4ek34hyoelidrleosys uthearilv...A firm j straw colour 34/to 39/ 15s, brown 32/to 3 3110 s; So oT i according to quality, 32/ to 361 per tun ; for SPermices r ' 93/ to 94/ paid for fine British. For Linseed Oil P $ have declined 9d to is per cwt. Still there bus bee" fair business transacted at 37s to 37s 3d on th e SpA b% taing 38s for delivery in the early p ar t of next year , n vs. the middle part of 1842, 39s is required. Rap e and ther lower prices have been submitted to at 53 ,s„'" 4 i $ 40i brown 52s 6d per cwt. East India Cocoa Nut " e " *; s ort , to 41s for the best. Palm at 321 t o 39/ lOs for ni; s " $ t Olive has been disposed of to a f a ir extent. GalhP°,llal 8/, and Spanish 75/ to 76/ p e r t un . This afte r A n m ° " o stlf public sale 280 tuns Whale Oil w e re otThred, 3n " -- a lin. sold. Southern Oil at 311 lOs to 34/ lOs for ore an quality. COAL MARKET. Ships arrived since last market..day, 21• •. d. 1) ' Bell, Robson & Co. Hartley 16 6 West W 1 " ''' '— y am ...... '' ,„ , • Chester Main ~ i . liolywell Man lB 6 WallsfEnd Hetton '''''''''' ,1 l ' Newcastle Hartley l4 6 Walk End Lambton .......91 f Ord's ltedheagh l4 0 W ai l s E n d Shinclii ...... .11 ; .. , Tanfied Moor Bute's l5 0 W alls End St e wares zi in. ,, 1 i West Hartley .... COUNTRY CORN MARKETS:_/ - .n t. -- Wheat. Barley. Oats. A.e— -;I Per Quarter. a. to s. s. to s. s. to s. 14. t 0 42 SO Abingdon 5B 7'3 30 36 24 30 40 /Lndover 66 70 33 34 25 27 -- 4 0 40 4 4 lanbnry 5B 65 32 40 28 33 36 4 6 44) Basingstoke 60 72 22 37 24 f 8 42 35 Cirencester 6O '7O :12 35 24 25 40 40 " I;oventry — 87 32 36 24 81 08 Oaventry Darby B5 '77 30 ms 23 28 35 41 si 41 Howden Hungerford 50 74 29 37 25 30 40 4. Malton ..... 64 76 29 32 22 34 Maidenhead 58 81 32 35 25 31 40 44 4 4 Nottingham 60 77 28 32 •A 29 41 61" Wantage 6B 80 36 34 31) 32 36 , 1 5 4 v Warwick 32 36 26 32 43 Winchester 76 38 29 d York ....... 58 70 30 36 14) 24 36 s.d'i 1 , j, Per Bushel s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. a. s. (Li s. 21, 7 0 , Birmingham 7 W 0 SI 6 3 6 4 6 3 6 401 5 0 AKEFIELD CORN 141A1thS 1 ' 6 4;. Wheat, Red, Norfolk and 5uffb1k......... —s. 63 11 . !,.! 813. hne 14t• s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. s. (1. 1 Is. el, .!.' a. 0 70 86 3 6 46 1 3640 1 5 0 „ ,(1'• WAKEFIELD CORN 51ARhE , 61;, fa" op. 1, Norfolk and Suliblk -s. t ine ~. nl'• - et 3 Lin. and Cam Yorkshire 6 r. .. 10 60 e , ....• 04. e ce' - 'White -- Foreign, fled - a . cm, to ;,,, oe s i t , it m..we 40,,7;.. nrt76 White6ss• to q v 6 0 : 0I , -s. to il'• t ine Barley, Norfolk and 5uffe1k............... ...... ... 2 5, ' - .4.2 - $* ------ Lincolnshire IW. , 10 .• -s. tine 0 .---- Yorkshire Wold . 2Bs. 1 0 ~... fier, .--- Foreign Beans, New . 3Ss. 10 a , tin e c , • -- Old Oats, Potato ... . a. to - 65. f i nt;; 3 ,, ......-•- Poland „ _,,, to - , tine p e n -; ...., to . - 1( - 4 ' , SIP? —. Vrierland and Small ' Of t ' to' bkealing .... l2d. 10,1 2 05 ,1 101, 6 Shelling ........ ...••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 00000 ON.. to ' 7'. - P er ‘ Malt -. Rapeseed ............... HULL CORN -4 5 . 65 5 . b ;- . 66 , * Whit( (per Quarter) 60s• '64s. Red o a . 64 , 3 „,„ Foreign .B. Malting so , ,1 0 .,- 30' Grinding 2, ° s. --. Os' Os a6s. Oats, British 105 7 :11 . 2 4 : 0 1ET. 5. 0, fi W. ; 4'. 7, ' Foreign (in bond) Beans 31s. 365 ' i,li. Pease, Grey 3 Bg• i 36 5 . 4 ,,,, ie-g• Blue and White s2s. ''''' 5.% Linseed -... is. stil. Flour (per sack) -.. 3 1/ ' Rapeseed per ,f) quarters) re la i ' d EDINBURGH CORN MARKET. is. 1 46 ,1 . Wheat. Barley. Oats. ire' ? pd i f 6 First 72s. lid 388.0 d. 28 5 ,4 j. 0. - . 0 Second (36 0 3& 0 24 0 41 ° 136 Third 56 0 28 0 18 0 - ; - .., 4 Id. Average price of Wheat ..... ........ ..... 3 1 . ''' Ii ~, , PRICES OF PROVISIONS, EC. „0j .- 01 , Beef, per io. ........ Os. M. to 01. Rd. Freshßutter, Ils. :,` l O A d 0 Mutton ..............,..... 0 5 0 7 Salt Ditt0,........ , " 0 r " 1 86 1 Veal _0 7 010 Ditto, per cwt... 4 , 0 , 0 P0ra..........—....... 0 5 0 7 Eggs, per dos., : 5 .9 0 Lamb, per qr. ..... 3 0 4 0 OatStraw(kpl.).. 0, 0 1 6 .1 0 fallow, cwt.......... ....39 0 42 0 Wheat Ditto ... 0 ' 0 6 Quarters Loaf. ... 0 94 010 Barley Ditto ..... ll potatoes,l4lb. ...... 0 0 0 5 Hay, per5t......... 0 0 EDINBURGH MEAL MARKET . pip' .1 Per Sack of 2801 b. Imp. Li 15 t First o e a tinePr Stone a l. . 0 : First Oatmeal Second ditto.,,,. Barleymeat. I 8 0 Barleypeeal ............. ...”' ' . I . . 1 1 . 1 . 1 . !: ... 0 0 1 1 0 6 Peasemeal Pot Barley l frBomo3osP.ett"4l9ase.apehis..a.c..E."."'.. Wheat, Barley. CORNWALL MARKETS. . (Calculated at 24 gallons to the bushel.) ' Wheat. Barley. !_......>( ' I . , t o ' 1. S. d. to I. d. S. d. to s. d. s. ",; 0 4 0 Truro — 0 7 5 1 3 8 --- i j h' g Helstene — c 75_ 0 3y — 0 3 9 St. Austell ...... - 6 g Y Bodmin 0 88— 0 4 4 , y r iskeard — 0 76 0 3„v .....-- o e ; Launceston — 0 7 5 • 0 3 ?.- 2 6 0 " Camelford 0 6 7 0 3 0 3 0 , . ..... 0 for ' 0 O s Penzance. ..... MINING I NTELLIGEI./ C.D. f. , stAi 0 Quantity or Copper urea sold at Redruth let weelc•" • 9 ..... ifn , vu. Average Produce OM ..... ~.. . ~,,. g. Quantity of fine Capper •"" d 1 -Y . -.1..• oar - Amountiorsale,:l6,4o4l.7s. Od —Average S ! l ' „ch i , „ ehi , 1011 C [tITI C' NEW MAGISTRATES OF Dußigr an d tions of the Charter Justi ces o f the 010 tber e ' ° i o f Corporation expired, this day, and it I : l °.,"i cs ioll become necessary to issue a , new Ceternecesn' the City of Dublin. We are told that O ° " r a CW: 4 document has already been • e d by the ° ; , t ate 9, cellor, and that the number l of new 3fa 'C' a r tb ° ,l llc r• twenty-seven—twenty Protestants and W .. ..e n Al"„ e Amongst the former are several of the OW - 6 `' Ald ' e d , lll3 ; men, and some ultras who have never bee eTo such as Mr. Ferrier, the defeated candidate.Lt.hsevetic Council in St. Andrew's Ward, and Mr. Bolleu'" are of the Directors of the B an k of Ireland , vre oatbe l/L 'h; are in the list. Two or three of them are A portion of the Magi s t ra t es on ly are ta ke° of s ': new Town Coun c il. W e h ave he a rd the n aui r ' , 0 0 4 of the Aldermen who ha ve b een placed in the iJersie" sion—Sir John Power, Sir E. Borough. a nd A ' . o . Kinahan, Roe, Purcell, and Boyce. But e not the list—our Reporter was publicly in` ° • 0 11 11 the Secretary of the Lord Chancellor that it 0 1 in f 5 be completed until to-morrow—we cannot be ee_ ii r cs sfi v to the details. We have said that a few Catll,°',ooo Liberal Protestants have been appointed• e fori °s s see how this could have been avoided, great a majority in the New Town Counci l ~r at e b l 4 as did ' 13 , 1 t there is nothing to be got by the office of Mugi"oefl ifi ri l trouble, we may take it for granted that the , it Lo d Mail will not think it necessary this time the De Grey upon his marrow-bones before M r ' ; any other di sc ontented claimant.—Dublin Ev es " ail' - etlev, WATERLOO-BRIDGE.—The half-yeariql /e f. / meeting of the Proprietors of this bridge Wa s The j l i po e terday at the Crown and Anchor, Strand. John Rush in the chair. The Report of the C° y aye stated the receipts of the Company from the PQ to h during the half-year ending August 23, 184"oriou't amounted to 7,5821 19s. lid., an d f o r the same P;teil ' t ; 1841, with the halfpenny t o ll, t o have eil l°l,i 'dur ilit " 7,4731. 155., causing a d ecrease o f 1091. 4s. 1 1° ' the six months under the halfpenny toll 6 1 s pun o GOLD WATCHES.—E. J. DENT , Que,, e appointment, ChrOnometer and Watchmaker to t."-telOci, and his Royal Highness Ptince Albert, offers _ . , 1 e a i r as of HORIZONTAL WATCHES at A tie ser ii :lo From their great advantages over those of the verticwor„, tion in performance, appearance, and fatness, he r°c e a re them for Ladi e s' a nd G en tlemen's wear. They 116 : w en t° engraved or plain gold dials anti cases, and the nlovleed. an d jewelled in four holes, and the performance glisr a . u ,. il eti o abstract from Mr. Dent's Lectures on the Cells" - y 0 1. Management of Chro n o me t e r Watches and Clock' 0631;.stra gratuitously by customers, or to the public price 1 9 . -- n i O r to SILVERTLATED CORNER —„, -5 47, - , t ; T. COX SAVORY, Manufacturing Silversmith, yub°,r hill, London (Seven doors from Giaceclinrch-st reet l'il O r {o - r the prices of the following patterns of strongly ~,.1 31 biel d9 Dishes, with silver handles and edges, and silv" engraving the crest or coat of arms : 0 The Gadroon Pattern. jo 10 Four Strongly Plated Corner Dishes and Covers... 0 Four Extra Strongly Plated Corner Dishes arid 0 Covers ••• .............................. The Flower Pattern. a Four p N.B . arpart Extra To hf StronglyeGr coverseat B they form extra dishes. r a t Plated Corner Dishes O a 23 log Covers ......................................... .., fish oo eato i n m ,v e lreland, vDra win g sith t postage lmov e ab le e fr ee. _ ,... __' -7abovehs 111 fa:" °ill Gellibrand Hubbard, JO ° 0 f a ß d a / ut ß a gia T t H . es ri. S u . a r e , Aro• On the 2d inst . , at Mon gu the 1 1 ° 11 ' - va t'', On the 30th ult ,at C li fton, the lady of T. Vie lne°ts Esq., of a son. . At Leamington, the Countess of Airlie, of a son . to MARRIED. sr a i . On the Ist i ns t., a t W a tf or d, Herts, Mr. Satil it foro 00 Harriet, second daughter of John Dyson, &IF , Ch ar les l el 4tb On the 2d inst., at Ashtead, near Epsom, ‘-'"7 - e9 tf , ".4, Frederick Denshire, Esq., late Captain of her ki th 0004, Regiment, son of the late Major Denshire, of the 7 . 4 SOW to Elizabeth Mary'Anne, only daughter of Natholo' . l R e Esq., of th e B enga l Ci v il Service. B u rton' so At Faversh a m, Kent, Lieut.-Colonel W. M. d, Alai ines, t o Ch ar l o tt e , daughter of the late J . She ' ' DIED. Gold gd Lieut. r On the 9th of October, at Barbadoes, R.N., Commander of her Majesty's steamer M ; ,r, On the Ist inst., at Worthing, Sussex, J. W ood, lateßevi;eo On the 2d inst., at Ludlow, Mary, relict of t he 2 , , o k Hodges, aged 69. On the 6th of Septetnber, th'emsbotri Captain Alexander Hodges, Bingal army , son l in eal, P On ;he 27th ult., at She ffi eld House, Ken go , Pe James, B the wife of Dr. Lang. At arbacloes, Mr. H. T. Walker , of Challnieg sifeo Sussex, aged 24. f At Boulogne, Mary, wife of the Rev. G. Shaper, Woodhay, Barks, and Lymingten, Hants , la te 0 f-NO , ' -'-- DO Y ° illd ie London: Printed a. Id Published by MVR- Sts No. 112, Stran:l, at The Sue Office, No. 112 1 OW' the County of Middlesex, Saturday, December" r