The Sun. — London, England, 1816-11-22 00:00:00

LAW NIELLIGioIcE. COURT OF KING'S t NCU, Nov. 21. Lo (((}3 : INI THV NING oN THE rsoati.ctrrioN OP waLTAM. mAttAn Ent: stsca et:Nos:, i, silt TH,MAS roenam. , tc, CoSiMoNLY ‘Li.t n't.outi Coon RASP.. I. MAIIIII , AT ps ayed,the judgment oft he Court rlos tit lentlatlt, tilt° it ‘Oll he recolleeteil V, 1, 1..011,1 gailtv At the last tit U Assizes, be . - . 3.0 - ,tiee tiultirtoUGil, ter hreaking front Bench Prison beton! the exriration of t!,, antler which be teas incontinement . i; , e Stock Is'Aetiine,' Couipi r4r Y• With At ,rne diflic,,by the defendant found his wAy let the thr , r of the Court, through the coo rino.:.e 40 persons aselobled in Westminster Fall. 11.4ti.ig, how.., et, gained atlw ; tt o , ce, M' flot.aoy 0 read the Lewin - a Judge's rei•rt of the trial, the partirtilars of which urcl already hilly before the politic - Lottl (...;oeftrane WA , askutl by Mr. Dealtrv, the ..Clerlt of the Crown Office, whether he had any affidavit" , to.produce in mitigation of punishment, istid lie replied in, the I`,l,tt(ttykr then battik il , ill thejoitit of filavit ,of, - ME, James, the Marshal, and Mr. Brooeholf, . cote of the offiects of the Kines Bench Pti.ol4 B i t cl ..-Ikao the atEdacit ut Saitmarez, the sm . . geon, whose opinion ,had. been ulcer' by :Th. Jones 4 . .. espy( ling the state of thedefendanc's health a . !ter his Vrcitpt ion 411(1 cfihfiiieffieht hi the SIIOII4 room. The ohjert of Mr. Jones's depositiwt was, , to traversoe almost all the StatelnentS Made by ~ Lord Cochratie in his speech to the, Jury' upon the trbtl at Guildltird, respectiog the allegedettielty of .his treatineut during his imprisonment after he . ,been retaken in the blouse of Com - mons t After .stating the circumstances under which the _de enchant was coninCr led to his, enstody, he well; leogth, the steps lie had pursue( to recover his prisoner subse quently to the escape, and'tie manner in which had been treated when lirottglit back to the prison. 'rile stress of the a 00 this pat Dlr. Jones's statement ova , to shewt, that after twill Cochrane was.re.tak the Winos! tttldet , ness and Iniiiianity WaS eVirWed towards him, con. • stst.oatty oath his pertional security within the i sva! l o , of the prison that the room which tt as (le , scribed by Lord Cochrane as a dark and tinwhole- Snlne dinigaull, Was .as large us an ordinal)? sitting ; that before lie was cOmniittecl to it, I.; tl bad hen taken to lay down a carpet upon the floor, and fit it up with Mi. Jones's own furnitinc, It tvtt , wtrne, that when the defendant was placed .11.•ere'llte,,firsr night the trindoke of the room was not (Liter?, hitt steps were. porsued to keep ont the oight Air by titeanS Of it pApet casement , which sew. r,m((sell ~o the following morn rig, owl a wandwe sobstituted,atid erery effort Wai Made to ,cutler the sit il,ttion of the prisoner as-comfort. is the nature of his case would alluiy. This Was , . the nnlv Toon) in the pi inn sutfievolly bttong to el , tlto the defendant in cotifinetnent, alto the exp,tieice of his previous conduct. in A few days aftetwat(l,;, honever, upon hearing 'that Ltd (..'oehranc was iii an ill-state alt health, he caused itch other rooms, situatedin another part - Of the prison . , to hr fitted up tar Ws. reception, •which , thoogh not suffiricutly secure to prevent the de. - feedant's escape. he ploptnied to accommodate hint w tti , upon tondiliqu of the Nolde Lord's de pwtiting in t!is bawls the .fine of one"thottsand k‘hieli lie 11,1(1 been bent eneed In pay, And Why( 111Clelit to eiy tor his safe detention. This was submitted to the Noble, Lord, hut he roused to comply with it, although the deponent had reason to belies e that the defend ant te.is in a condition to comply with such terms. ord(t to he 5;16401 of the real slate of his 'lwo it deponent seot his own family surgroo, Mr. lumart It, In ti:e defendant, requiting his opitiion npoit tt t point ; and upon Iteaft:g ate tottavour: - able'report flout - ) that •gentleman, he sent a' Ines. sage by. hint to Lu d Cochrane, t!lat if he would reel, pledge his own ward of honour not to adopt means of leaving the prism) agaie, lie should he relooced to the Monts Which been previously epared for him. Rot with this stipulation the d f lettaa`• t did not chink proper to comply. flow !ver,'('L poltettt after yards; of his own mere trio• floc', and without the sanetiOn either of Lord Coehratte's seeloity, or his word of honour, caused him, to he rutioved to the rooms its iines. unit. alit( (ferment, in order to prevent the pos t:Jrility'of the escape of the ptisimer, was obliged, at has (twit usherwe, to provide guards and sen tinels tn witch the entrance to the apartments • day •atol during - the remainder of the finexpired palmd of „Ile Noble Lord's confinement, whioit hal then three months to run Deponent • ltd no other ohject in the present proseclttion than tti A to that which his sense of duty tic' the itUperatieely demanded, 811 1 1 in the hope; that if any ill his OWit Subordinate officers hail hem it-11 , 1111114..1 1 1A to the detelidant's escape, lie Shtr;,lll 1i:1 et he• sipporittuit y iii punishing thorn n lip lywid ptnetnkS, itiltf Vilitiliating his OW)) ..eltit rw-tel (ma enotloct in-the transaction. Through- Out Iher shoe (II this prOttenint4 be had arted CIA Irt upon his own advice and responsibility, the perforokanee of so painful 11 duty he ban . inentred an expellee of 30W., the whole of besides the reWarei of 30t) gniiirus, which lie bid paid for the apprehension of the de te toluot, bad' been defrayed out-of his own pocket. Mr. BrOocholl's and Mr. Saumnrer s it deposi tions went to -confirm My Jones's- statements -of the troisartions ill the Kino Betith prison, after thrriefentlant's recaps ion. After these affidavits were reed, t Alr. Justice lIAILEY, in the absence of the Lord Chief Justice, who purposely absented himself front the C.mrt during this proceediug, addressed - the defendant, and told him that if he had any ilAng to say in mitigation of punishment, now was the proper Lord CoonaANE immediately produced a Ina nit,clipt speech r t enormous length bat r to befroere 1:t began to r ead it said, that in orde p . the Court being troubled .with any ttraneous or irrelevatit matter, be Itad drawls together on I,aptir, in as Small compass' as possi , be such (,i)..ervai on« as , appeared to -him to he necessary to iubtoit to the Gourd previous to their passing ~'~ . of the sentence. He hart anntlier object also t his, whlch was, with rt view to prevent any toi , re presentation of what he should submit to then . Lordships. Ile th.n proceeded ‘vith writtet.• whir'h stared, that at the late trial before Mr.'..lintice Borrow.;ls he had prayed that his nit- . 'sect in eseapitti.; front ihe King'. Bench Prison Was. not cri it ii it. The Leltrlled Judge, however, who then presi.ted, had told the . Jury, that their decision storm case•betthe them was to be go verned by the fact proved in evideoce, and trot by the intention of the party ae--cused. In this defi nition of the law he differed ti-ton the Learned Judge, and submitted, that the decision of the Jury ought to hive reference to rite intention. and not-to the tact. Sorb was the position laid d o wn by \lr. Justice Abbutt, upon the late trial of Laniscejoi Davison, who Was pt osecutedby his Loidship Guildhall, for and corrupt octinry, on tbe,intliei went against his Lordship for the Stott; ti;xchange Conspiracy.. The No ble Lord was proecaliog to enter, two to statemetit of what p ,ssed o n_ that trial, when Mr. lust ice k I_B_OTT • iniel•VSed, and said, that 'the d‘fen,iant could not enter into Cho tple4iioil of ljaeisint's case. 'rite only questitto here %vas, i% bat poniihment the Court ought to inflict in a case wberer he Net of lain;; found at litrge before the pe. riod of his former imprisonment was proved Ag..inst hist Lordship. Lola Coehratie said he was aware of this ; butt in order to what was The dot y, of the Bench, he submitted that he was at liberty, on the preient o co.ision, to point ou t that the raft; of t a w laid ittown iu the case of in 'jury was coital!) , applicable to the present case. Mr. Justice BAILEY` ato, that defertchnt most he aware unat there i% as to ,teat distinction between a caseot perimy and - a ease of es'eape. Lord COCIiRANH replied, that when he hod read his statement upon this sultieet;bo hopeath I. the COnrt woidd feel the same impressiou upon the law as lie did ; h'llt it lie was in error, t e tl.etr Lordships Wbuld, no doubt, decide it cum ct Undoubtedly, %vh.tt he wa, now about to submit to'the Court appeared to hint to be•an vf,ential point foi the Court's consideration ; and it he was Permitted to proceed, the Court haue 011pOrt11111iyMt iinlol44 whether or not be w as i m properly. occupying their time. But if ,e was not peraitte.o tri go . on, ;hen be bad 110 ri dress, and the Court. would proceed to prontoot c't fit it senteoce, without his toot ring into die Mr. Justice li,kluzy s t it, that he had inertly suggested to the defuniant, that the till. g n ow untier•consideratiolu was his case, a nd no t that of any other person I t was not cotopelvtit to flint to cutter into tiny detal n i aut Dlvis.on's cit s e , nor discuss the pi (Trio y of the Learned JUd g e'S direction on that occasion, still less to que;tion the propriety of the decision in that case. Ii teas very tar front the wish of the Court to prevent his Lordship from stating, any thing which was mate rial for him to state, provided it was relevant, to the subjei t helot e the Court, Lord CoCiitTANr said, that the fact in his ease was proved, and that the criminality of the inten ' turn wis wholly disproved. His Lordship re ginned his consideration of thc , ease before Mr. Justice Abbott, and said, that the direction of that , Learned Judge ought to have. beet; the, rid,. laid down in the present case. It was essential, he contended, that the mind should he pr,ived to have gone along with the 'act. Both this trial and that of Davison were the effects of the tonne,. trial of his Lwrislitp, for the supposed eimpiracy at the Stock Exchange,• for which he %vas roost se verely (not to express it stronger) sentenced by the Chit (Justice of this Coml. Mr, Justice IlamEv—That was not the act of the Chief Justice alone, hut the uct of each Me l o, her of the Court, and if the (Abet Judges had been Of it different opinion from the Chief Jus tice, he could not have enforced his judgment, whatever might !Ave been his wish upon the sub ject. 13ut supposing there bad been no differearc eft opinion, I consider the sentence on that occa , snot as the sentence of eacti judge—all of Munn deliberated gravely open the case before them, It is not the act of a single Judge. Lord (.:OcultartE-1 am aware of that, but if your Likrddlips • have no other means of jirdging upon the case submitted to your considuration, hut what is contained in the notes of the Chief Justice; and if those rioters be not correct, what Other means hrt;se the other Judges of coming at a jou foundatinn for their` judgments Noble Lord then restimed his comments upon the case of Davison, and took occasion to question the lrrol)rlety of the Learned Judges' conduct on that occasion, when Mr. Justice BAILEY 'again interposed, and said that the Court could not—it Must not, suffer the defendant to in - we:act) the propriety of the sum ming up of the Judge in the ease which' bore no relation whatever to the present question. Lord CoenRANE said, that the ' Court would find that what Lie meant to Sabroit• respecting D I visou's case was relevant to the casehefore their Lordships. .Mr. J BAILEY''"—It cannot. Lord COCHRANE again resumed the saute topic, and again called forth the interposition of Mr. J. !tat - LPN', who said that the rules of the Court were binding npun'all, and could not be relaxed in favour Of anyintlividnal, however high his rank. The detemlant was clearly irregular in the toorse he was now pursuing, and the Court tiattst set . its lace against a precedent so dangerous. he Coati acted under the solemn sanctiou of an MO it 'Wig, maintain its own dignity, and Was bound to uphold those rules-which had been established by the wisdom of ages. :Any thing relevant to the case before them they would most cheerfully hear, but they could not suffer the rules of the Court to be set at naught.: Lord COCHRANE still insisted that be had a right to call the ease of Davison in aid of his present purpose, especially as the decision Of the .hay `Otis in opposition to the charge of the Learned J udge. Mr. Justice ABDO - CT.—I have no 'apprehension of the result of any investigation into my judicial c o nduct, on any occasion since I have hitt the honoor of sitting upon the Bent), ; but I am cer t4nly bound, sifting in this place, to say, that the investigation of any opinion or direction of 'lilac upon any other case, wbolly unconnected with the case before us, ought not to be permitted. it seems to MC that the course now taken by `yore Lordship has nothing W de with the case before the Court, and I for one nortt decidedly resist the irregularity of this proceeding. / Mr. Justice IlootoYD expre;sed himself to the .au:* effect. Lord COCItRANIt again res ;met', but again call- ea forth the interposition of Justice BAILRY, Mr. Justice ABBOTT, and \lr. Justice HOLROYD, "ho all agreed that his Lordship was so irregular, that they could not ,ntfer him to proceed u ! iiitt tiny thing but what bore upon the Cage heiore the Court. -• , Lord COCHRANE then said that he had nothing : more to state. The CoArt must pronounce its judgment, without giving hint the opportunity of stating his case. They were at liberty to sen tence him in Any way they thought necessary. It teas impossible he could disronneet his present observations from that part of his adtkess. gin! it,h the Court might thnik,reletant. Overwhelmed as he wit , by the injustice done to him by the Bench, :ina by the servants of the Crown, he supposed he must submit to whatever punishment the . Conic might think proper to impose upon him, without a heating. Mr. Justice ABBoTT.— . -You are nut entitled iu this place to speaft of the Hutt; ice tat Be• , ch ; nor are you entitle*" in this place to accuse pet , ons who hate 00 oppot Imlay of repelling, your. - 8,111011. That is a tvhic:t you have A right to pursue. You ime t Allude to any e4se, which has no conoeceo with the tinder the cousiderati ut the Court The C.iiirt is ready to in kin!, ani pAy all re-pek.t to any re m Irk you 1113 y tiditress , rehtilig to the tutee ts beet. prctei t eel against -you, and upon ,% Lich the July have plimuiinced a verd,ct. Any rehiting to that matter., witch yin* may ukase in add l es, to the Court, we will niftod to, ,sets' give - your ease a due and merciful ,thasi deration. Lori, CocnuANE.--Your I4ordships are ,aware that I hate nsrbi eery endeavour to obtain an investigation into niy 'ease. Yon well know, that 0. het, 1 came IMO this Court owl* former rocca snit), you refused me a new trial, underArret ext 'of a Hide ot Court ; and yon know writ that af vfi,iavits,were rejected upon that occasion, because the persons making those aflidavits - had been call ed it tvitnesses ; and yin) know asst, that such eildenee had been rye( ived by this Court, ablto' e persons giving it . had not beim called as wit- tosses. Justire BAILEY said,this was not • the fact. Tho r eStablishe rule of the Court in moving for mew trials %vas, not to receive the affidavits' of per• i sons ' , lit) had been examioed as witnes*es t, lotl tilt` previous trial, not to receive the eh - davits of such persons as Might have been ptodueed upon such previous trial. It WAS upon this ground alone that the new trial was refused in. the in stance alluded to. Lord CoCHRANE said, that as far as he•Vras en pable of judging, Lordships had decided otherwise. With letipeet to the present point, he regretted that the Court Would not allOw him to state his case in his own way. Lie was desirous not to enter into any verbal explanation, lest he might be subjected to misuuderstanding or mis ieprosetamitin, and words put into his month ultieh he never tittered, - hie had resolved to lay hi s c ase f.dly hetore their Lordships, but if they were not disposed to hear him, lit' must submit to whatever their decision might be; their Lord« ships' mind seeming to be • made up upon a case which they had slot heard. Mr. Justice kioutuvo said, that the Court were ready to pay the tonwst attention to what ever Was relevant to the case before them ; anti • it the defendant could show in what poisible way the course now pursued bore upon the ease, the Court would be most attentive to it ; .but sinless he could spew bow it bore upon the charge befole them, they were bound to abide by the rule of Court applicable to this, as to all other cases of the like nature. Lord COCHRANS. —Your Lrsraships must be ( ike aware that I have no other means of shew. tc.relevancy of the matter I am urging, than by saying it—by submitting it to your. Lordships' at• lention.—l shall trouble the Court no further.. Mr. MARRYATT then addressed the Court at considerable length in aggravation of punishment, dwelliog principally upon the topic c ontained in the affidavits adduced in support of the. prose, Mr..Gunwsi , followed shortly on the same side. The deiendaut's excuse for breaking prison was, his desire of !miring an opportunity of, preferring a coutplaint of irkinstiee done him ,to the House of Commons ; but his escape took place on the 7th of 'March,' and he did not make his appear ance in the 'House of Commons until the 21st of that month. The Court, therelae, would judge of the motives of the defendant by the manner in ‘vbieli they were effecteil Air. Anot,Pnus was also on the same side, but added nothing to what was said by his Learned Colleagues. After the Court had deliberated for some mi- mites, Mr. Justice BAILEY, in passing sentence, re capitulated the cirentustanees of the case, upon which he commented at length. The Court, however, bad taken , into consi , leration the mere'• ful recommendation of the Jmy (which in all cases would have its due weight), and the heavy consequences which had been •drawn upon him by the nature of the latter part of his imprison mew, by which his health had been impaired, and therefore they ordered and adjudged bins to pay a fine to the King of 1001. ; and that be should be coMmitted to the custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsea of this Court until that fine be paid. Lord COCiIRANE remained on the floor for a few moments, but the fitie not being p*iti, the Tinstaff was sent for, and, to the etntudy of that Officer be VMS committed. In passing thvongh Westminster-ball, his Lord ship was repeatedly cheered by arrow!! of persons who were waiting to hear the 'result. He was afterwards conveyed to the King's Bench prison, and placed in the apartments above the lobby which he had occupied after his escape until the expiration of his sentence. The followint ludgmenta were then given by die full Court, upon the tnotiou of the Aitnruey , General :-- •' Yin. Whittleand War. Ilomlin.. for übstruct- ng Excise Officers in the executipn of their duty, sentenced to six months' imprisonment.—William 1-10pkin, for an offence against the quarantine laws, in handing from a ship under coarantine, a fine of 2001. and six months' imprisonment.•••••• JAMCS Browne, James Fenn, Thomas Los thee, Thomas Simmons, George Simmons, George &wider, and Thomas Hughes, for rehcoing an it»pressed seaman, nine months' imprisonment each." POLICE INTELLIGENCE• BOW-STREET. FOEGERY.—Yeo; nidv a final invcstkation took phee before Sir NATHANIEL CONANT, re sperting; the extensive forgery. to' the amount of 15091. ‘vhich has been committed on the house of Messrs.' finhbock and Co: liTotkets, by a forted &Aft, purporting to he a iirrift fr'om the loose of Messrs. Josling and Co. merehaots. Of Browl street-bnibliltel. Jvhn• Wicks Hannah /is , his wife, Milieu! King,. mid Richard Thompson, were the perscins cliarted with . being concern ed irt forking . 'tad ntterito! the draft:. The Prisliivr, .Jotin been a eletk i t t! , e hpake 9f Messrs. J.,tlitt ; mod he is eHirged with having forgpil the draft on Messrs. Libb(),.k atiti Co. rind which was pail to the prConitr, The drift tieing for the large a•notint. of 15001. atter it lwen paid, it «a • d scov-red that i; Oiero drew .Vessrt: Xolin;.; and Co.'s scronnt 'a few which led to'llie di-carer} of the forger`y. 'l' o.• prisoner, King, 'n iddition to interjog the forged draft. tie Mes-rs. L .hhoek, aftern l ad!. to the 10001. ;1 , 1 5(1!),. M I A-notes which lie loiti red e:veil at' the hachirp of Milt •Q. ck, to the 13.1.1% of Ett,throl, and received' Small t,otes for princip:A l ly 10/. 81141 51. n otes. for' which he was to receive half the al3o'ttit; of the forged - draft. The prisoner, Thna,p•ont ;t ccornpnuictl King, in ~ cbanging the 101. anti 51. notes. but declares his innocence as to t.he knowledge, how King eltne possessed of tliero. The prisOneri, with the exception of: Wicks, were fully committed for trial.' QUEEN-tiqUARE. STEALING A, VlOOtst."—John Keys, who was xc' mantled last w,eek On 'suspicion of haring com mitted livers felonies, was brought up for litra tber'examinatiou ; and being put to the bar, %cis charged by George Scott, 33, Orchard-street, Westminster,, with stealing a violin, his property. Mary Whetter, who saw him take it away, not being. present, the prisoner was tenianded to Monday, as were also Wm. Gillings, Walter Pa terson, WlnJackman, and Murray, wh o were all remanded with him last week, and now brought up, but no fresh evidence against any but him. ElcaPE Fitotd NEWoArt.---Another of the trA ports, .who lately escaped front Newgate, as it is s omlosed, is detained at.Oeteford. that tt firms character bad been taken intoscostody therer and when interrogated , he refused to give c if he his name Or address. A person will be sent forth with to Hereford to identify the prisoner. CIIILD,DROPPING.--.A fine male infant, appear.. int! ahonr a month old , was, found at the door o( Mr YATES'S house in FiCaoll Bars, on Monday. It was wrapped in a kind of clothes basket, Co. verea with a blanket, and it had on eery &era ' clean linen. A Lady, named G 1 IEKSON, took Os child under her care. A young man of the n a m e of WeSTMEATII, clerk to a witotesale house at Nottingham, lad his pocket hook cut front an inside pocket yesti-roaf morning, whilst looking /t,t.he millefacti , uN ing 'front Newgee. Theme was a 5/. li-ank 7Of EnJhrtil note in the book, se%Tral provincial motels and some hills of exchaue,e tor acceptance. A few nights ogo, “Fll pen ; in the service of Mr. ALLUN; fancy-trimming mannf.icturet . of Le i ' center, haviug expresse flier tears tor tuelstetY n . 0f his premises, in cosrptenee, as they statet• of havine: observed several inwicions ei,aracters loitering about his shop. Mr. A. vas itoloreil ".) accede to their proposals of watchint: his re' n ! se , 9 during the night. Without sus p ecting nuY O O4 I n.. proper intenti. n on the part of his join-m.ll Mr. A. retired to rest lit the usual hoto ; bio , l rising in the morning, it was soon disco"' e d the above statement of his men, was merely a tic; tion, to enable them the mare readily te , e itec their base designs upon the pr o p ert y of their. e_T' i ployer, os goods to the automat of upwards (Al. Were missing, and theft/it/y.ld guardians had 110. e . Through the prtutptifude of M r. A. they 10%. been apprehended, and are cOmmitted for trial I, 'the next Assizes. - On the 10th inst.. at Cupid, in Prance, the laadi of 141441 t Wyneker, of a:son. On Wednesday last, the Lady ot the B.ev.-Jamesl4lo4l)llv . Vicar of Aberford, of a son and heir. nt - C e On the 12th inet.-in Scotland, the Lady of Lieutena lone' Hastings, of a son. On the 14th inst , at St rabane, Ireland, the Lady of Col l . Brooke, C. 0. 441 b Regiment , of a son.On 'fnesday evening, in Portland - pl ac e , the Lady of R• Jeuninge, Esq. of a son. MARRIED. , At ?Madras, in July last, Mtlor-Getteral Ha re,. to gisS Dl' Harken. daughter of Captain Hackett. SO' Ott the 4tli lust. at Ediultorgb, Johlt Ilarher,El',*4ol, geon, to Jane Campbell, daughter of the late Jotoe 3 " l i:ivil Esq. Collector of the itcb uiate in the Hon. E. 1. o l ' Service•at Callient. ,„eatht Oa 11to 13th lost. at Ralliologh, County ei We lc— 4 Lieutenant-Colonel Everattl, 34th Foot, eldest ,on V Tili: Everard, Esti, of Rinclalitoten, Conoty of Meath, to llarb stcoutl daughter of Sir Hugh Migent, Ilart. On the 6th nit. at HartiPeuirE,Pi.p Normandy, aeilrfir;jlt)%° Esq. of Netley Path, in the. County of Mayo , i sl e , Ott the t tth inst. at FAinbalab m r jai Stirling, - , . „ , . nes , 0 .. Commander of th e ship Ilyder Ally, East triditi-CoontrY rive. y otsi On the 16th init. in North Frederick-strect, Vilbrot"— Iteyriell, Esq. On the lath inst William Draper Lloyd, Esti . II" of the ishnd of larbadoes. 1 l On Nlunday last, at Leatherbeed, in the 14tii Year age, the Hon. Henrietta Hewn:lark, second lough tor ' Bate Lord Henry Braude , k. ND ON : Printed lir J. CARS-PAIRS. Ikleti t rtt Lflbuildings; and putilfshint by W. A. SCRIPPii de' ot""--a; at rite Sus-omeg. No. 2, Strlnd where *cutsi °Tilers, Latters:&c. ("cot -paid) Must be addrevag. Advert', r