The Sun. — London, England, 1828-06-12 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. The defeat of Lord Lansdowne's resolution in the House of Peers, on Tuesday, had been anticipated, so that surprise or disappointment formed no part of the regret which it occasioned: Why the House of Commons, representing the people of England, should so frequently, in the shape of Bill or Reso lution, have sent to the upper branch of the Legis lature a fruitless prayer for the concurrence of their Lordships, on that question which is of ,all others regarded as of the highest iraportance to the com mon repose and safety, seems a mystery hot easy to be Solves!, and one into which it may not perhaps be attended with much satisfaction to inquire. The Bench of Bishops, with one or two illustrious exceptions, must •be taken, upon subjects, of this snature - as a body not much susceptible 'of change. For the more tardy progress of opinion amongst lay Peers than lay Commoners, we may say, with all respect, that the bulk of their Lordships being pretty well provided for by the existing laws, as well as by the hand of fortune,—having more already done for them and for their interests, being bolstered and propped up, and feeling few anxieties, but to bask in the sun-shine of rank and privilege,.and to enjoy those goods for which men of ordinary, station must work and exert themselves, if they aspire to obtain them,—these Noble Members of the Upper House of Parliament, we say, as a body, are not perhaps conscious of the same necessity for intellectual action, as men less favoured, or, to speak more accurately, less distin guished, by birth and its collateral appendages. Thinking is sought for by the Commons of the coun try as a lever which enables them to ascend in the scale of life : by the heads of noble families, reflec tion is not resorted to, but as an expedient (and then not always) to prevent then from falling. They are already at the top of a wheel, of which they de precate any further revolution. They are suspicious and jealous of every change • and more so, in pro portion as it comes recommended by the intelligence of searching and superior minds—the great rival power to hereditary wisdom. There is a monopoly to be preserved in every quarter as well as in the game laws: beyond those maxims which tend to perpetuate the monopoly, the faculties of aristocra tic reasoning or even recollection need not be too much burdened. With the Utmost reverence, there fore, for their Lordships' house, its functions, its dignities, and its various immunities, we are half tempted to surmise that the portion of its heritage which consists in an immunity from the tax of " thinking" will go far to account for the tardy and tottering pace at which it follows--for it never. leads—the popular advances of scientifie and en lightened legislation. We took the opportunity about three years ago, to observe on the extreme disproportion between the relative arguments and numbers; the former of which derided the merit of the question brought before the Peers in 1825; but the latter, unfortunately, its fate as a practical measure. It was a glorious consideration that such extraordi nary powers of eloquence and reasoning should be displayed in a British Parliament on the side of jus ,tice : it was deplorable that such powers should have been by sueh feebleness defeated. in the re cent discussion of the Catholic. question there was a difference, we know not whether to call it equally encouraging or mortifying : never was the balance of ability more incompletely adjusted.. Against Lords Lansdowne, Haddingtoo, and Plunkett, what force was arrayed by the anti-Catholics ? Even the ex-Chancellor and the present,—the author of the Pitt Clubs, and the learned Lord who defended the actual state of Ireland by confessing it to be full of dangers out of which he saw no escape 1 , It is not our desire to depreciate whatever credit may he fairly claimed by Lord Lyrualburst for the professional ingenuity of his speech, or for its sincerity, which ,vat no whit less professional; but we shall just re mark, that the only argument which he _dwelt upon, and which implied that because the Catholic leaders had shown themselves averse to give securities, the Parliament should surrender its right of legislation. for the public peace and safety, will not bear one moment's dispute. The Catholic leaders, it has been well observed, are running their popularity . 'with the mob against their own exclusion from con stitutional liberty. In the course of their frequent meetings, the loudest and most audacious orator was he who did most to keep up the fever of the multitude, which he feared to lower or Let slacken, lest the pressure upon the nerves and prudence of the legislature tssight in its re laxation impair-the very principle on which the suc cess of the cause depended. He, therefore, who under the eyes of an irBamed assembly, took the highest ground, appeared the least willing to con cede or compromise, refused the greatest number of. quiet and business-like proposals, waa the wildest bully, and the biggest blusterer,—he was sure (and will be in all countries sure) to enjoy the most tie bounded favour with the people; and since that was the stake they played for, no wonder that the veto and every other condition, was refused by the dema gogues of Ireland. But, in truth, it consoles and rejoices us to see, that by the turn of this last de bate, the whole field of permanent exclusion, of 1, , abstract impossibility—once, and until this occasion, urged by the Orange advoeates,—has by them been utterly and explicitly abandoned. The debateable ground is now narrowed to the single point of secu rities; that is to say, the question has become one —no longer of conflicting principles—but of mere terms. This is an immense move towards a happy consummation. Lord Eldon disclaimed expressly being classed among those men who said " the Ca tholics must never be emancipated!" • This, we re peat, is an incalculable victory. Lord Lyndhurst's arguments went openly to admit, that if the Catho lics gave securities they ought to be relieved. The Duke of Wellington's whole speech was founded ottl the confession, that if there could be an agreethent between the King of England and the Pope, analo gous, though not exactly similar, to that under which other Sovereigns controlled the abuses 'of eccle siastical power in their dominions, the Catholics I might be emancipated. Why then it follows that his Grace will embrace some occasion of negotiating such a compact with the Court of Rome. Lord Plunkett says wisely, do wh at is just, and you under mine the foundations of the demagogue and priestly po' • ver We add, for the twen tieth ti m e, ne g ociate not with the Irish Catholics; try if the Pope w ill transfer his restrictive power to the King of England and then let the King of England, by virtue of the law, bid the Catholic priesthood resist that power at their peril, If the Pope will not give s , p ; this power ihen assume it by ksct of Parliament. ll the TeCa tholics at large, A' It is root meet for the safety a the empire that you should ir t main an isolated and stranger people : as Protestants, our prosperity re quires that you should be free." To the Priests let the Legislature say—" You shall RZ,efPiSe no power here, whether upon the constituent ba s k or the representative, but under the superintendence of the State," Is there any one weak enough to sup pose that the laity would have inclination to disobey? .—or that the priests, if ever se well inclinatl, would have the power ? If the Duke of Wellington wale h is hand to this measure,—net to shut the doors of the Constitution against the Duke of Norfolk, imt to throw them wide open for th e reception of the Catho lic ()Erase, though a plain straight-going soldier, will have untied (not cut) a knot which has puzzled and deterred all the dissident statesmen of this century. — Times. No wonder that the Catholics reproach the Pro testants with their endless inconsistencies. . Wh ere as there are Protestant who dares to ces ? follow hi s prin ciples to their legitimate consequen The Arch bishop of Tuam, for instance, one of the heads of ,an established Church, does not hesitate to contend for the exercise of private judgment, and to insist that no individual can free liimsellfrom the responsibility of examining for himself his reason for the hope that he entertains. This Prelate does not see that his own existence, as a Member of the Hierarchy of a Church, established by law, is a violence offered to his own principle. Bayle, himself a Protestant, and the most dextrous logician perhaps the world has yet seen, shows the brethren of, his own communion, the in consistency of the principle of examination with legal establishments. "As you have no tribunal (he says) whose decisions can determine the faith of in dividuals, and as they must judge for_themselves how far such decisions are conformable to Scripture, you must consent to the contradiction of your Synods, if, on examining their . Resolutions, it is found they ure not conformable , to the Word of God; and then all the favour you can , demand for your Church is, that it should have the poWer which is allowed to any Company of shopkeepers or arti sans in a town, to exclude from their Associations those who will not follow their bye-laws and.regula- . , . tions. This cannot be refused you; but you cannot,_ on the other hand, pretend that those.whom you exclude from your Ecclesiastical Corporation should not form another Confederation, as they are born with the same rights that you possess, and are as much entitled as you to examine Scripture, arid to follow their own reason. Hence there results very clearly the divisibility of the Church into as many particular confederations as there are heads of . families; and perhaps its analyses to the most simple principles, which are individuals, resolutio usque ad, materiani primam." Again, the Lord Chancellor and Lord Plunkett, and .more particularly the latter, consider the Establishment as everything, and the , Religion as nothing. : " I think," says Lord Plunkett, " a Religious Establishment essential to our well-being; And without a dignified Establish ment, in times like these, religion itself Would be degraded. I am, therefore, persuaded, not only that the Establishment is necessary, but that the rank, tiffluence, .and dignity of the Hierarchy is important to our best interests. I think, further, that its power and influence are, and ought to be, so great, that unless' that Hierarchy be con nected with the State, it may be too Powerful for the State ; and hence the necessity of main taining that connection for .the benefit of the State." Here we have at once Protestantism, and every other isni, offered up a sacrifice to Mo loch. It is a naked Theocracy. Bellttrinine con tended that the spiritual, must, from the nature of things, command the temporal power; and the only difference between Bellarmine and Mr. Plunkett is, that the former makes the Church command the State, and the Pope the head of the Church; while Mr. Plunkett makes the Hierarchy of a particular State independent of the Pope, and dominant in that State. The truth or the falsehood, the reason ableness or the unreasonableness of the principles, are to him a matter of indifference. He leaves :all this to the, Hierarchy ; and to prevent confusion, makes the. Hierarchy so powerful, that were it not itself the State, it, would be too powerful for any ,Government. The religion of Mr. Plunkett is the baseness of mankind. Like Machiavel, he has no objection that the mites of the people should amuse themselves with what he no doubt considers the silly hopes of a eompensation in a future state for the ills they suffer in tloe, provided they be made the prey of. crafty men, whose thoughts are centered in this world. It is clear that he entertains this low, gro- • yelling conception of religion. If he believed that it were any thing more than a scheme for abusing the vulgar, he would, not have the audacity (we cannot ; use a softer term) to found the security of religion on means repudiated by the whole tenor of that religion. If there is one thing more clear. than another in Scripture, it is that the : Gospel should not be beholden for its influence to wealth or worldly pomp. The possession of wealth is expressly con demned again and again. The first' Christians acted agreeably to the principles of their religion, for they lived in common, and accumulated no pro perty inilividually. It is stated, as a proof that a mutt could- not: be religious, that. he was Lord Plunkett,„thireore, may contend that the affluence of the Hierarchy is essential to the preservation of the Establishment; but this does not follow from the principle of examining the erip titres, for which the Archbishop of Tuam contends. But, in truth, the Question with the Catholics has nothing to do with religion„ The Aristocracy of Ire land wish to preserve to themselwAthat share of the property of the country which is compuhfiided un der Church Lion's and Tithes. As long ,w t;;04 property exists, the Aristocracy will supply men to fill the various offices in the Church giving title to it. The Catholics can never hope to wrest that property from the Protestantsl and as the prapetly is the only thing that is really cared for, the cant about the Establishment, which, as we have said, will always exist in sufficient ;limbers to enjoy the property, is truly . ridiculons. The Lop.) Chancellor proved the case of the Marquis of Lansdowne $ and if his Grace the Duke of Wellington meant any thing, he pledged himself to make an attempt to settle the question. " What we do," lie said, " must be dare by legislation; and although legisla tion has not eWected this hitherto, I trust, if it should be deemed noessary, we shall do it fear lessly." The Lord Chanceitcr gahnits that the Ca tholics are masters of the represent#4o of Ireland, an d t h a t dui'. po iver must increase, and with lfi .the influence oppo6ed to the Government. On thg chewing, therefore, of the Ministry, as the longer the settlement is delayed the water the evil to be con tended with, no time 'should be log in attempting a settlement. At the Meeting of the Cuth,opc Asso ciation in Dublin, pit . Saturday last, slr. O'Connell alluded to a subjeet that occupied a very prominent' part in the recent debate. The following is an ex tract from the report of his spee4t in the Dublin Morning Register of Monday last " Our aim and object should be, to avoid disuirinn i for I know how formidable it makes us that we are near al naißion in England, and seven willions in Ireland—(hear, hear !) That was one reason why toy indignation was excited against A Journal that would iota-Alyce a topic likely to promote el4union amongst us. We aid pot go before Parliament awning our right to be emancipated, because we were Catholics. We did not go there stating that see should he emancipated, because our religion was the best (whatever might be our private opinion). No; but we maintainad the principle that it is the undoubted right o f every ch r h t i ait to worship God according to the dictates of his conscienee---(hear!); and as Catholics we will pever tarnish our religion, day claiming our freedom upon any other principle. No man ohookil seek to convert another, except with the assistance of God, and 4e powers of reason. ft (slant) he quite inconsistent in lid to wane bargain With bigotry; sn.i. its a Catholic. I have no notion of sacrificing my religion for any e t irthly good—(hear ! and cheers.) The law has nothing to i t o with religion—it requires no temporal assistance—it increased ip spite of the severest code of laws that were ever institnten—,geaven j has protected it—the arm of God will support it-- , an Act of Parliament has not made it—no Act of Parliament shall interfere w;tla it. Whence comes this notion of clipping and paring down ow. religion ? I recollect reading a book that was written by a Crensliman upon equitation, and ,the author stat e d, t h at t h e fi rst t hi ng th a t wa s done by An y Englishman, when he got a horse into ,his possession, was to xopsider how much he could take off it; ge cut off the mane, he clipped t h e f et l oc k s , an d lie generally cropped the emll—(lagEhter.) Si) those security-men were busily engaged in dovisie w 4,4 w they could cut, clip, anti mp.t b e opened for me in the noon4laY, W:4 curtail our religion, in order that, it might slip in under the .4 the Constitution. I rap boo nna ----Y at the door—ht will I att em pt t o leap the gaze of the oblic, or I ent er i t not. wilt wither e at all, un l ess th e o,yco : r de i s t c . end it to is s n l i o p t Cost:t . ,:;,tiOn re co g nizes the p rinci p le i ‘ a v o eg w r et4 no i 4a1.. every Christian his a right ,to worship God accordin g to the,4,tates of his conscienc'e(hear). std' c heers.) As Catholics, we ,tva* c no t • ••• .4 1 interference with r i wr religion — as men and as Christians, ;ye want to establish of conscience; and as po . liticians we wish for una nimit y of fge b Z of senti , meats and • , of intereotO. r, Chronicle. • There was a trifling eii • To r in our report of the division in the Lords' PP Tuesday night, which it 0%41 to an may be proper izorrect before we . , y comments on the division itself. The . nuxobers p.tooti as follows Contents . . Present l2B 3 1 . 62 : cozies .9 Non-Contents—Present .92 Proxies • Majority against the Motion... *5 Thus then have the Catholics of Ireland beets . again baulked of any hopes which they might have er4er tallied, and without almost any additional prospect, in so far as numbers are concerned, of having their .41 6 . claims to -equal , rights •and privileges with tbeif fel low-subjects adjusted _on. a satisfactory basis. As we hinted yesterday,, however,. in noticing the divi- s sion, the question appears to have been .considered . in the Lords, not only in a temper and spirit of • greater conciliation than at any previous •period, but on grounds bearing much less strongly against the Catholics than had been formerly ad vanced. The objections which have been usually drawn frtYht .the incompatibility of the exist ence of any portion of Catholic power with free institutions, appeared to have been almost wholly given up; and the opposition to. the Resolution of the House of Corrimons,foundedprincipally,even by the most strenuous opponent of Emancipation, on the ground that no adequate securities had been offered. We know not whether the parties who took this ground Were sincere in their declaration-- we have heard it surmised that they were not—but if they' were, the edneession is evidently one of no mean importance ; and judging from the concluding speech of the Marquis of Latisilopne, who, we pre sume, is well acquainted with the real state of tho case, we should say that the question of Catholic EMancipation had greatly progressed in public favour since it was last brought forward in Parliament, and that when it comes next to be discussed some spe c ifi c measure, calculated, if possible, to set the question at rest, will be introduced by the head of th e Go vernment. Looking, in fact, at the disturbed and distraCted situation—distracted, as was justly re marked by the Duke of Wellington, by the com bination which has taken place between the Ca tholic clergy and laity—and disturbed by the immense power and authority with which the denial of the Catholic claims naturally in vests those who advocate them, whether honestly or not,—it is impossible to hesitate for a moment in coming to the conclusion that some thing must be done to allay the irritated feelings of the Irish population, and converting it, if possible, into an integral and co-operative part of the British empire. Ireland at the present moment, and for years past, - has cost this country more than all her colonies, both east and west, and in every quarter of the globe, She has, in fact, instead of forming part of the nation, and adding to its strength, be come an intolerable tax .upon it—not only taking from its resources, and adding to itsodebt, but dimi nishing its power and influence With foreign states, and presenting at all times to the latter a point which might be easily attacked,. if .required, and from the carrying of which 110 inconsiderable danger might arise to our national independence. On this head all parties are agreed—all readily allow, that Ireland, consideted . . as a part of. the. British Empire, could scarcely be in a more unfortunate situation than she now is, and that something.must and ought to be done to remedy existing evils ; but what that some thing is no. one seems yet..to-liave discovered, and when it will be applied seems to be as problemati cal as when the question of Catholic Emancipation first came before the British Parliament. With re gard to the securities which have been so much • talked of, we know of nothing deserving the name of security which' could authorise the British Parlia ment in releasing the Roman Catholics from the operation of the existing statutes against them, un less it is convinced that the progress of knowledge is such as to prevent the Roman Catholic religion from again overshadowing these Kingdoms with its dark ness, and the power of the Protestant part of the Empire so . superior and confirmed, as to remove all idea of the catholics..ever acquiring the ascendancy in our COuncils.. We .may remove causes, such as the interference of..the .Pope in the appointment of the Catholic Bishops, &c., which might tend,.if per mitted to exist, to disturb the public tranquillity; but the only. securities worth mentioning are, that enlightenment of the people, which is making such rapid progresa—the internal strength of thekingdom, and the " attachment' of its subjects to the Constitu tion.- Let these thiags but exist, and the Pope and his Bulls may be defied—if they do not, then we think it would be as impolitic as it would be mischie vous to relax one jot or one tittle of the present ex.; elusive system.—Morning Advertiser. While the " Whig Press" is labouring to per suade the people of England that they are in danger of haying their rights and liberties subverted by a " Military Gpvernment," because the Duke of Wellington is at the head of . the Administration, it may be useful to inquire what was done for the pub lic by the " Civil" Statesman who preceded him, and whose own weakness and folly were the cause of the Duke's present elevatifin: Dining Mr. Can-. ning's Administration, not only was nothing done in furtherance of ." civil and religious liberty," as it is called, hut there was no attempt to do any thing. The q nestion of the " Catholic Claims," which had been previously fixed for discussion, was, by com mon consent between Mr. Canning and his new assoriates,*the Whigs, postponed ',he die, and com pletely shoved over the Session—a manifest proof that the " liberality" of the Cabinet consisted more in a zealous attachment 'to their' Places than to their principles. As to the question of the " repeal of "are Test and Corporation Acts," it not only was not introtfuce4, but Mr. Canning took the opportunity_ of declaring, in his place in the House of Commons, that he sever would, consent lq.l4at repeal so long as he should hold a seat in that House. Tie made a similar declaration 'with respect to the question of PfirAigmentary Reform —a q uestion which, Sir Francis tiirtlett, Sir Robert WilSon, Mr. Hob house, and others, maste for ;many years the Alpha and Omega of their political creed, Yet did these most " uncompromising patriots," on the (luxe of o,e lying thrown partly open, and the vista of the Pass.dizt.: within being revealed to their view, rally with cheers round the standard of a Minister who declared that he would oppose their favourite project of Reform to the last hour of his. political estence. This question dared, therefore, be nD more mooted in his time, than that of the " Catho lic Claims, or ,tire repeal of the . " Test and Cor poration Acts." So Enti,ch for the practice of the iber4 principles of the "most pf t ill Ad ministrations! Put this was not KJI. The repeal of one of the Si* 4„cts, 4ifecting the " Liberty of the Press," and wbieh, the W• had always de nounced as a most •odious exercise of t;74/Pas was pr.. ? I p -osed , and the " disinterested" Whigseitherstaycoi . away (tax the House on. the night of the discussion, or opposed the nep g o. . The Stamp. Acts were also enforced with extraoretinari r; ,our,—especially the Receipt Duty Tax,—se that petiti4na veie pouring from all the shopkeeping towns in England ace . ount 9f the vexation thereby produced to in ternal trade ; -,* A 4, , to crown all, the system of the Court of Chancery, which had been pre viously denounced by the leaf s i4 Whigs as radi cally defective arid mischievous, via., iW e pcled by the same persons with a facility of selrcon mstiction which was truly astonishing. Now it happens ,t,lO .. .under the " Military Administration" of the Duke of V.r4ixiaton, while the Whigs are . . out of the possession . or the hi/Re ,pc iir Tr Aliate office, the repeal of the CorporaOdn ant tg4` Astg has been proposed and carried ; and . let it not bo iii re g s n, too, that the first Minister who raised his 'voice agaliost hltti ouestion was the 6' liberal" Mr. HuskissoP, who eAtend k egl that it was not a proper time to propose it; and,.if l'ii4arisri‘e i lpg been taken, the Test and Corporation Acts would Sall'have Vc•-' isted, Yet this is the Minister whom the gentlemen 'of tlae W r ing tress incessantly weep over as a martyr to his love for aptl religious liberty. If we look to things more titan names, Tall judge pf o r character of a Government by its acts, Wtnei. , is a .betty cri.terion than the cant of party.-illiwn ' Though the-town is full of the report wp ftilnded to a f ew d ays s i nce, ofi Mr. Brougham and the IYIF- ItllB of Clevelao having given in their adhesion to the Duke of Wellington's Administration, we do Ntot And that, as . far as the former is concerned, there ;s any ground for the supposition though, as to the Noble Marquis, it is generally supposed to he the case. Mr. lirougharn is too formidable an opponent for the'Duke, or any other Minister, to be indifferent about. Bat Mr. Brougham himself would; on the other hand, display much less saga- !bk • * N • %lc , 414, A t %qt• 4S, city than the world gives hiture.redit for, were he to fall into the net which is always, it is true, spread 'for the members of his profession, and in the toils of which so many of them have been. caught; to the utter destruction of that which ought to be upper most in the mind of every honourable man.--4ame and consistency.. Some of Mr. Brougham's friends are at great pains to have us believe that, besides the Catholic Question, there is no real point of difference .between him and the present Admini stration. But,' itthat be the case, at what has Mr. Brougham been railing during the whole of his poli tical career ?, and if there be really nothing but the Catholic Question which separates them, that not being a Cabinet question, why are not he and Sir James ,Scarlett the King's Attorney and Solicitor- General ? Political differences are, we admit, more in words than in reality ; and that it is the extent to which men sometimes commit themselves in words , that therbecome tied down to opinions which they do not seriously entertain, to the extent at least im puted to them. Mr.. Brougham is one of those who uses" words that burn ;" and, on that very account, may have the credit of standing Wider apart from the known principles of the Duke of Wellington and his Government than is soberly and really the case: .But, be this as it may (to say nothing of other obstacles which are pretty well known to have been hitherto insurmountable), we feel convinced that Mr. Brougham could not join the present Ad ministration, by taking office under it, without a sa crifice of character, which, in the present dearth of that commodity, we should be sorry to see , him, or any man of his eminence, throw away. In the mean time it is said, by those who appear to know best, that Mr. Brougham's abstinence from taking lately the active part he used to do in Parliament arises - solely from the increase of his professional business, which, of necessity, curtails - all other pur suits.. We do not wonder that men should tire of spending their breath' on unprofitable words, when they can bring them elsewhere to so mach better a market.—lbid. ' There is one argument so frequently urged by the advocates of Roman Catholic • Emancipation, that, although we cannot give them credit so'far as to be lieve that they themselves deem it of any weight, we fear it may .not appear in all its Worthlessness to those who oppose emancipation. We hear perpe-. tually in every debate, accidental or formal, of the danger that must accrue to the empire from allow ing the present state of things to remain: We are told, with much appearance of wisdom, that we may 'put off the settlement of the question ,for a Ses sion, perhaps for two, but that it must be settled in the way its friends require at last. Now, if it could be shown to us that there is any real danger to the kingdOni from the present state of the laws respect ing RoMan Catholics—above all, if it could be shown that in one, two, three, or a dozen of Ses sions, emancipation . must be granted—we should, most undoubtedly, be the foremost to advo cate immediate concession. If—the whole of the circumstances of the parties remaining, the same—emancipation must finally be granted, the sooner that necessity is complied with the better. There is no use, and there is but small policy, in delaying to do an act of imperative obli gation until that which might have been courteously received is ungraciously taken. But this, which the advocates for Emancipation so invariably take for granted, is the very point which requires to be proved. Where is the danger which threatens us in the present state of the law ? Is it meant to he insinuated that the Roman Catholics are preparing for another rebellion ? Do the seven millions intend to gain their object by : physical, since they have failed by moral, force ? No event, we admit, is more to be deprecated than a recurrence of the: horrors that afflicted Ireland during the last rebellion, and much would be done, and more would be risked, to prevent such a recurrence. But where are the proofs of its probability—of its possibility—at the present moment ? We do not think our Irish corn patriots.quite. so wise as they think" themselves -; bat neither do we think them quite so senseless as their enemies, in 0115 case -- fur en..),flies they are and ca lumniators to bootL-fhe Emancipators, would fain have us to do. Any thing in the shape of an attempt to wrest Emancipation from, the Le gislature of the country by force, or by inti midation, i s so utterly ridiculous, .that he who should contemplate it, much more he who should make it, would be not so much an object of . punish-. ment as of pity—not so much deserving.ofNeWgate 'as of Bedlam. What then is meant by saying there is danger in the present state of the laws ? Trouble there may be—inconvenience there may be—their discussion, Heaven knows, is troublesome and incon venient enough, and yet, as we must be discussing something or other, we may as well keep to that with which we are acquainted. But danger there is none in the year 1828 that there was not in the year 1818. Nor will there be any more ten years hence than there was ten years ago. Again—where in is the logic of that argument which would persuade us 'that emancipation must be granted ? We 'can not admit the existence of such a necessity, nor can we see the grOunds upon which we are called to admit it. We are persuaded that had the Marquis of Lansdowne, when pressing on the Peers on Tuesday night the doctrine that they must sooner or later come into views, been asked why, his Lordship would' have been sadly puzzled, for an an swer. - It wottld, - indeed,'require more eloquence and more knowledge than belongs to the whole of his party, to furnish a satisfactory one. The only rea s son for,the Marquis's opinion that we can discover is simply this—that provided a ,petitioner is suffi ciently pertinacious, he must be heard. We allow that to beg long,,lood, and importunately, is not the worst method imaginable. It often succeeds . even wheie the beggar is no better than lie' should be ; but what is given up to the love of ease in small matters no man is so silly as to conce'de when it ex tends to great. It is extremely foolish to argue that the Catholics will—it is still more foolish to argue that they ought to be heard " because of their much im portupity," We . are fully persuaded that with all rational men it has injured their paiwe, Still we find no fault with them. 'Let the Q'Coonglis and the §hiels deplaim—let the Bprdetts and the pettys make motipos day after day, and ession after Ses sion, while the fdrme dp ppt offend the laws,, and the latter do not sin against the rules of parliament, they may fret but they will not sway—they may ex cite our bile, but they will not change our purpose ; the Mods of the Constitution call say, " thus far and no farther" to the hundqth application, as firmly and fearlessly as they did to the firSt.—Xew 40-qe.F. On Thursday night last, twelve horses in the neighbourbi4 of this town, had their manes and tails c ut by some villains, Isho stale the hair.— York Courant. ANCIENT 'SEPULCHRE AT CANIELQN.—On • Tuesday last an interesting relic of antiquity was acci dentally discovered near this village. The workmen em ployed in levelling the face of the Red Brae, which con sist Ica 4 4,orp' lqa, ;7. y struck their shovels against a quantity of stones, 'on of !d.? poet a foot below the surface, which were 1040 to belinilt long square chamber, running nearly from east to west, a nd about twelve feet in length by three in breadth and depth. The stones were mostly set on edge, and bound "togethPr I.7:th a very fine yellow clay. Those at the west endWhict r foriniti ,-gibr ~ !7bibite4 marks of having been hewn, but in' gertOrtetl4 were Very !atgc, blocks, having their smooth sides inwat'd. Biretched on ,the floor was found a large skeleton, with the feet turned to the east, hit without any metallic ornament or coin, and around and above . it was a thick layer of carbonised wood, the anticeptiC nature of which, no donht, tended to preserve it entire. The whole; sUrfaceof the walls bore atrong marks of having been submitted to an intense heat, being discoloured 4nd quite friable. The bones, upon being lifted with a spade; fell to pieces, and it is to be re gretted that the sk u ll, w hi c h wa4 tolerably hard, was car ried off and destroyed. A similar burial place was dog kip some years ago upon the top of a small knoll in Crmiers, there, a little to the west. An account of the above, and some other late discove r i es is, warded to the Edinburgh Soc " ie e ty und orA t n an ti d, Antiquaries, be f :, lyora gentleman who is residing near the spat.—Caledonian Mercury. POLICE 'INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HOUSE—Yesterday the Justice Room was crowded to hear the examination of a charge of felony preferred against Tanner, the waiter at the . George and Gate Inn, Bishopsgate-street, by a tradesman named Pin kerton, reaiding.at Clapham. The prosecutor stated, that about nine o'clock on Satur day last he had made a purchase at a shop in Bishopsgate, and went to the George and Gate Inn, for the purpose of taking his place to return by one of the Clapham stages. He had no sooner entered the door of the Inn, accompanied by a friend,: who was with him to see him take his departure, than he was struck by a man whom he believed to be the prisoner. Several other persons, whom he did not know, surrounded him, and he was knocked down. When he got up, h e discovered that his pocket-book or bill-case had been stolen from his pocket. It contained fiver 5L notes and seven sovereigns. He gave the prisoner in charge to an officer. The prosecutor added, that he was himself given in charge by the prisoner, though he knew not for what. The prisoner was searched, but nothing was found upon him. Mr. Monroe, superintendent of the East London,Water works, corroborated the statement made by Mr. Pinkerton, whom he accompanied. Both witnesses swore that it was nine o'clock when all this occurred, that it was day-light, and complained of the conduct of the constable of the night, who refused to receive bail for their appearance. Tanner in his defence stated, that the complainant, Mr. Pinkerton, had been at the George Inn on the day before, to go by the Clapham coach, but he was too late. As he had taken his place, he insisted upon having a special con veyance at the expense of the house ; and being refused, he became so riotous that it was absolutely necessary to turn him nut. On the following night he came again, accompanied by the other witness, in a state of intoxica tion, and began to attack the reputation of the house and the characters of all those who belonged to it. He abused, in an extremely gross manner, the females in the bar. It became his (Tanner's) duty to turn qut both the complain ant and his associate. In doing this, he was struck re peatedly, particularly by the complainant, by whom he was, he admitted, provoked to return a blow. He called for the watchman and gave them in charge, as a consider able crowd had collected. Then it was that the corn plainant declared that he had been robbed of his pocket book. The coachman of one of the short stages proved that he left Balham Hill at a quarter past' nine o'clock; and that it was about ten o'clock, and quite dark, when he returned to town.—He then saw the complainant and his friend in a state of intoxication. The landlady of the George and Gate Inn, the bar-maid, and another female, corroborated the statement and evidence in behalf of Tanner, and proved the conduct of the com plainant and his friend to have been exceedingly outrageous. Mr. Monroe—The fact is that both Mr. Pinkerton and myself were perfectly sober, and that the watchman and the night constable were both iu a disgraceful state of in toxication. The LORD Maxon, in answer to this statement, which excited loud laughter amongst the crowd assembled in the office, observed, that drunken persons frequently imagined themselves the only persons in the world who were sober. He did not see the slightest ground for the charge of felony against the waiter; he set the prisoner at liberty, and . said that hiS character ought to sustain no injury front the charge. GUILDHALL..—How TO MAIOE A MAN 00 COMFORT- A BLE.—Among the prisoners brought before Mr. Alder man GAaaArr, on Monday morning, was one Timothy Foggarty, " a fragment of the Emerald Gem," charged with having disturbed the ward of Castle Baynard. .The first man who mounted the witness-box to testify against him was Murtoch Moriarty, another "fragment of the Gem," and at this present a watchman of the -ward aforesaid :—" An plate your Wurtchip," said he, " its me self brought him into the watchus, betwixt • and between the twelve and the one this morning, disortherly dthrunk —indeed he was—and kicking up a desperate row in the ward ; but afther he com'd into the watchus he' got asv, and the constable let him out of it—indeed he did, very kindly ! but when he got out he forgot he'd been it—so kick'd up another desperate row in the ward—indeed he, did, mighty ondacint afore St. Paul's Kethadril !—in regard of which we brought him into the watchus once more, and the constable said we should take him off to the Cornpter for a regular disortherly—and we did ; that's him—Tim Foggarty ; scratching his head at the bar before your Ho nour this morning." Mr. Murtoch Moriarty having said his say against his countryman as- aforesaid, turned himself about out of the witness-box to make way for john-Nokes; another watch man of OA- aausae:.ward,-who deposed that "this here Timothy niggarty did indeed kick up a terrible row, and would listen to no reason whatsomever, but chuck'd him self down on the pavement instead; by which means—or by means of which—they were obligated, in a manner of speaking, to tie his heath' and legs together like a Calf; and in that ere ' fashion five of 'em carried him to the Compter as well as they could." This was the case for the prosecution; and Mr. Timothy Foggarty was asked what he had to say in reply to it. . Mr. Timothy Foggarty is a little:Juan with a big head, and that so closely cropp'd, "that: each particular hair did stand an end" like bristles on a scrubbing-brush : his brow was wrinkled arch above arch, his complexion a red -russet, and his garments (what he had of them) were of the same colour as his complexion. " What are you, Mr. Timothy Foggarty ?" said the Alderman. " A labourin man, ,Sir," " What do you labour at ? " A brichlayer, Sir," re plied Mr.' Timothy Foggarty. • " And how came you to be so drunk and disorderly ?" demanded the Alderman. " I got a little dhrop, Sir—an it got the betther of me, Sir," replied Mr. Timothy Fog garty.—This was all he had to say, so that, in all probe • bility, the result would have gone bard with him had not an entire stranger • voluntarily come forward to " see bins righted." This gentleman was Mr. Kirby, a respectable inhabitant of Warwick-lane; who having been disturbed by the noise of the watchman conveying Mr. Timothy Foggarty to the Compter, looked out of his window and saw them shame fully ill-using him. One of the watchman was dragging him along the gutter by his heels, whilst another was be labouring him with a thick stick ; and they were' so hard at work in this way, that they bad stripped theinselves to their shirt sleeVes—their clothes being held by other watch men who stood by, aiding and assisting ; and occasionally poking poor Tim Foggarty with their staves until he roared again. Upon seeing this,' Mr. Kirby opened his window and remonstrated with them on their cruelty, threatening to report them if they did not desist. b t 11 0 I‘ l . t Alderman Kirby for G this information, o oexpressedti, and much obliged :s e k if ed Tim Fog garty whether he had any wounds abou t him ; and he re plying that he " didn't know for w ounds," but t hat he felt " mighty sore and stiff," the Alderman ordered scan, of the officers to inspect his person. They did so and re ported that his body was covered with bruises five or six inches in length, and of the thickness of a finger, appa rently inflicted with cudgels. Upon this discovery the watchmen began to prevaricate, and at last the frish one (Murtoch Moriarty) admitted that he himself had a cudgel, and that his conntrye aan was struck. " But,'' said he, "it was nothing to speak of minty a small sthrike or two, just to bring fain , about, and tnale him go comfortable The Alderman, uponthis, remanded the ease until yes terday, and ordered that the whole of the watchmen con cerned should thew be in attendancetogether with the in strtrments with which the" contfort" was administered. . . Yesterday . . Yesterday they were all. io attendance, bringing with them, in their respective fists, the sticks which they had used upon the person of Tim Foggarty to " make him go comfortable ;" and certainly, if they were the identical sticks used, they were not sueh as would make any genuine Trislithan at all uncomfortable ? for the whole five would hardly make op one such skeHavit as we haye seen whacking away' for pure love at 'Donnybrook fair. The watchmen were then examined, and severally de clared that only one of the sticks now produced had been used upon Tim Foggarty's person. 4. p. 'PT 4i00 1 ; 4 franlfly rieclared that lip " had no rfalgftirin Pr baXhig ken It* 0 all ;l' aryl eYfhttlailY the Alderman dismissed the matter. .Bow-STREET.--Three noted characters, named Jagger, Evans, and Restal, were brought up yesterday _ for re-examination, on a charge of having a number_of Li,4tore skeleton keys,. ip t i, e i, ppsse ,o 9 .. F,,,, ab , the . officer 1?c-breaking instruments, and implements to inani WhO took them Attu; custody, not however tel , a i g ails (as he supposed) to prove' their . hltvink' ‘i 'e ..tift_red once tlie sen tence in .Orciard-strept, Port of the law, they were dischdrged: ' T . r b i ll n it : l4 p ' O ulterer, was hrottglit'from NARYl.FElONE,—Yesterday John Mark 13ifielol b... Andrew 'iVigl,t on young Man who was stabbed ? . - , ~ .and being carried . b fl , t h e office his lodgings in a coach, • manBLnd.saqt)'ruae, week;a g. a !brot ge • i t . and laid upon his left side, the PfllY PP/Rio he can bear, his eyidence was taken, an d it differed from that given by former witnesses only by bein g , in s o m e points, more cir , ciimstantial. After stating that Mr. Tollitt, their employer, was gone into the country, and Wight, the prisoner, threatened to leave the business and seek his pleasure, because a dispute arose between them about sending out some fish, be said, . - " I plaited myself in the doer-tray to prevent Ere goin. He pushed by me, and I struck him with 114,i hand upon the side of his head, for which he tlisean i to pull me up at the Police-office the . next day, and ilv: p me pay. I took a tray of fish -down stairs to put it ti!j the ice. I stayed ten minutes, and while I Walt , there ,I b 4,!,) him say twice, ' If Mark Bifield hits me agein, I. wish y , / ,may strike me dead if I don't stab him to the heart' i I came up. He said, " You are as frightened now as g j you can be; you look as white as a boiled maggot; 1 1 are no man and no father of a child ;" and a poSiltergiof knife he had in his hand•be thre* with all - his force at head. I dodged away, and it did not hit me. I saty r , , take another knife off the block, a fish-knife (the one r dm:0), and thinking he was going to throw thatat 0 ,0 I ran to him to get it out of his hand. He chopped at to keep me off, and cut the joint of my finger (the finger of the left hand.) I caught hold of his collar, tried to pull bins down. He then took the knife in r, way (back-handed) and stabbed my side. I halloes.:j "0, dear me, he has stabbed me!" I let go of hitb, ran out of the shop to the doctor's, with the' knife s tick, in me, and, as I crossed the road, he threw a steel riy r me, and I felt it strike my legs. Ido not know whee l `, I pulled the knife out of my body, or whether it dile' out." Mr. Carter, surgeon, examined it on Tuesday ; he foLi it to Le on the sight side of the spine, about an long, and half an inch deep ;. the knife had divided '; artery, which oceasioned th e flow of blood, and but the resistance of the clothes and belt, which the young 10 wore, in his opinion it would have produced death. Mr. Rawuusort addressed the pri.oner--" Young 0 this is the last tithe I shall see you, do you wish to saY a 1) thine" Prisoner—l do not wish to say any thing, but I hoe you will alloW me to give bail. Mr. Raw cannot do that. He was committed to Newgati far trial. WORSHIP-STREET.—Mrs. Bend, who, on Satoh day last, was charged with: destroying a grape vine in garden belonging to her' landlord, yesterday ma d, her or pearauce before the Magistrate. Mr. BKNETT (the presiding. Magistrate) queatioued b ef as to what could induce her to act so mischievously. The prisoner said Mr. Bowen, theAandlord, %TO troublesome being ; .abosive. anti:always .calling her b * l, navies.. On one occasion he told her, in the public r o ,`, she was ." Belzebub, the Queen of Hell," and other like 0 , pressions ? and in a fit of passion, she certainly did.destt", the vine. Mr. BENF.rr, on looking to the Act of . Parliament, o the complainant he was sorry he could not fine her ; b she being a tenant, she fancies she has a right to do ' D I You may bring your action against her for waste, which your only remedy. Sarah Jenkins, a girl of 15 or 16, was charged w ) ,, stealing a hat from the shop of Mr. Ga r d ne r, in Chiswe h street. A woman named Hurley saw the theft committed, AP I , gave information to Mr. Gardner, who pursued and too the prisoner with the hat in her possession. She did O f r deny the theft, but exclaimed, " Well, you may lag me f t seven years if you like , and then I shall be fresh and ew e ' when I come back again." She was committed to Newgate for trial, and will Pr' 7 bably be dealt with as she anticipated. THE. MARKETS. COAL MARI A dair's 324. tid Beaumont 30 6 Burdon 30 0 Killingworth 32 3 Liddell's 23 9 Pontop Windsor 3l 0 Shipeote 29 0 Tan field row••••••••••••••~4.• :32 0 Willington 3:3 6 • Wylam 32 U Walls End Bell and Co. T. 2 9 Ditto Bell Robson & Co. 33 0 Ditto 32 3 Ditto Carr and C 0....— 29 0 Ditto Cramlington— 28 0 Ditto Hilda 30 9 Ditto ilotspur SO 6 Ditto Northumberland 50 6 Ditto Peareth.--.....—. 30 0 Ditto Perkins and Co. 32 6 Ships at market, 96%—Shi ET.—June IL 95 10 WallsEndßewieice& Co. , 6 Ditto Ilittdc Ditto Russell's g Ditto Walker g Larnbton's Primrose Nesham Alain 6 Russell's Lyon's „ .. s° 6 Walls End Hett0n....... g Walls End IA Ditto Stewart's 0 0 , 7 96 0 Hartley r s 0 Ward's Walls End Nutt Small i t c on s oat rnall Tan field 9 1 p Old Etherley small ! 3 p New sold. 50i• liió TII w~ COUNTRY CORN MARKETS HUltl?'Hig'W2•l`".. • Wheat. Braas Barley. Oats. ,„.., ---- t• Per Quarter. s. to a. S. to a. 8. to S. 9. t . , 4 Abingdon—.---... 52 69 35 42 35 42 And0ver...........—. 58 30 23 0 Binninghatn— 48 58 32 36 22 36 — 4, Bridport -- 52 58 . 32 39 26 4s , Cirencester -- 56 56 48 32 23 26 —r,, Faringdon . 49 54 36 38 24 31 4y. Guildford 44 64 36 45 22 30 b ° Henley ... 50 '66 32 413 26 31 6 0 Hereford —....... . 64 66 46 60 -- 42 D. 7 Nighworth .... , 46 62 30 36 23 94 0 Maidenhead 6O 68 39 42 28 39 —' 60 Oakingham .- . 56 60 30 36 28 36 0 Reading ........—.— 56 :4 28 33 21 32 b y Salisbury.... '5O 58 28 32 22 26 —6,) Southampton ... 52 56 37 40 30 52 - a Stroud Tewkesbury —..... 54 60 40 42 32 38 . 6i Uxbridge .—..—... 5.5 74 30 Si 24 32 -4 .. i Wantage—, 55 68 27 32 20 32 --* 43 Warminster .-- 46 60 28 P 5 23 27 --- t pi Windsor 6l 73 33 .34 22 30 -- t o Worcester.- 5 3 56 24 .31 24 28 ' CHELTENHAM MARKET.—June 10. d. Per ildshel. , s. ti. to s. 3. Pet lb. 4. to 1 Wheat Barley Oats Beans 4 9 6 6 Lamb 8 Pease 5 0 8 0 Pork 6 Beans Peae Hay 49 66 Lamb 50 8 0 Pork N. Os. to 41. ( )6. pet ton. LEWES MARKET.—June 10. White Wheat (per quarter) £3 00to£3 4 ° Red ditto Barley . 0 00 0 O , Oats, New Pease OOO 00: Oil Cake, New DUMFRIES MA_ d •t° o ° s. d. s. d. 3 Wheat, Imp. Bush... 7 oto 7 3 Butter,lBoz Barley 0 0 4 0 Eggs, dozen 0 5 4 Oats 2 2 2 8 Beef, per lb. Flour, 1416. Oatmeal 1 9 110 Veal 0 4 aThl Potatoes, cwt. CATTLE MAREET.—The Sands exhibited a very %' merous show of all kinds of cattle, but the drove - be 3- exposed to-day were considerably more numerous, And-ift general in better condition than on the preceding wee k ls— ; year-oldsi and upwards,numberstleirrespective 315 two-year w v olds, — big u landers, 276 stirks, 48 cows, and 6 ' bulls. • De 1266 :1 7 i the heavy cattle was l a t e i s t he d ay o f beginning, . I ;li st 11 , believe all the l o t s expose d did not 'Meet with purclv el- i 10 the prices were the same as they have been for 2:a many weeks past. The two-year olds were a very show, in point of condition, and a great deal of bo", n ; o i was done in them. Prices were the same as those obrA" last week, viz. from 71. to 4 guineas per head. stirks likewise met with no variation, and they maY the stated at from 5/. to V. 10s. per head. Although dealing in young cattle was by no means so brisk as ott tb day week, still it was an excellent market, and s o advance of ss. per head which was obt4ined last week, n i t fully maintained. A fen; of the highlanders were so ! ' the Old prices. We are not. aware that' the sale was brisk, The pig market still continues brisk. , RKETS.—June 4. BIRTHS. On the 10th inst., at Gothis Cottage, Wimbledon, tile lady of Lieutenant-Colonel Hull, of a daughter, still 110 0 0 1$ On the 7th inst., at the Countess of Sheffield'o , ' Partlaud-plue, Lady Catherine Legge, of a daughter . . On the Bth inst., the Right Hon. Lady Byron, ofil, On the Sth inst . , a t her father' s h ouse , i n Boll ° square, the lady of Capt. Martin, R. N., o f a son . WhOitnmtohrde,sEthsqi.n,st.th' at Dudm as t on, t h e seat of "W:;e lady of th e H oe. 110 Rey. e Bridgeman, of a 'KT MARRIED. On the 4th inst. , at Paris, Chevalier Brant, late Se i ereck tary Of I.egatio n to his Majesty the Emperor of Braz il '. , London, and son of his Excellency the Marquis de 1 3 , 8 ,' 1 , 11 e - d cena , to Augusta Elizabeth the amiable and accoulP l° o f 4augitter of the Chev a li er Kiechhoefer, consul-Gene ral hlraOs in tliat city . . y. youngest o i e uonigi etsht Dowager edajusgt hi Lady ntesrt.o D f auttinw Turin , sal an On the 7th inst ., in So p t i n E er l se . t.street, Portman- 4 ' re' of Hare.hall, Essex. At Homerton; in the 86 Esq., formerly a reo . i4 e pc t he p „,b o f Vie thoohyfneaaAre r o n n o ; d : N p ly : t: C o a ., r. r 4 o t : : : :o e tl l ,, moreiiind, Jamaica. 'l4 On the 10th init., in Albemarle -street, after a ling , 1 ., illness, aged 21, Sobieskie Judith, eldest daughter of R. B. Dean, E6q., Chairma n o f th e Board of Custotil!, On the tith inst., a ft er 4iipuring mi n ers, Frances OP betii, wife of W. S. Addington; Esq., of Coldingtort-lair in the county of Bedford. On the 10th inst., at Llornsey-road, in the '7lst Ye! f t of her age, Elizabeth, widow of the late Mr. Wm. Enirnel..' formerly of Pentonville. Joll a On tt.e 10th inst., at Sydenham, in Kent, aged 69, 1 . Parr Welsford, Esq., late Secretary to the Patriotic Fof), and the Waterloo Fund. PRINTED and PUBLISHED by m..youlio, at the SUN Of- NO:112, Irand, London, ....t. N %4) Nb• O. Ira" 41111.. , ~_ C. - CO] • THE LOR STONER: give Notice, That they are be willin g to COIN C OALS for the I part of the followi lIEBBUI "WICK'S, BEI T he quantity re '"re or le t' s, Pool Those persons ll "Pital with the li p °l ' applying to Bret 'q, where fo must be fill e d u p a tor e Monday, the le afternoon. CITY 0 ON sATt: oi FRIDA' the City of Linea TO NO. I, OF 1 1: Tint; esniti:bl:l:.se‘ilnlNNntil::: ireiil ' :t e l a iE nt i s 4 i a n adi ' tc . nr g: ciit ( i rln l eey ' , : sl i ' ish i ai n igin t : ,: iyibx e h tltie a co : hde n s tei e 4,:ii: : :::,ift te e , i '• tr Y ; and the w 4tioetly embed v it ~ r in any ether l'tracting variety The LINCOLN %pirit of hostility tc : 1: : : ::: :t i a r; C: l i e no J l O civ ' ,l l , B :;i r r o n n iif f not a o‘ :l r, :Ps‘tovPel cunt: ~I, \ 'th the parties i ei 44 Be of public uti . The period at wl ~1 ' °tie of singular b ,", t e• The pr i i - „ l ,",aPs best seen ':-, . , '' iliil ~... bliu e s:nr : oi ihe. i r af () ) 4 :: : : ) .m it::it t :34 hueu a c onen y ' : u' i dtsi n rst e s FopP e °aefoor t c Psui e n ro r iinPe a oyez , • r National Ilistl t ' . ' h ' l .visionary duct it ' Int thirty yea will rather be t t... 111 , 71 epo e g r e ta t P o o nf r t es t a l i t t s n e: d e ou e t p ha l ui e ni t A r of its ander fl u i r e icultural Diets 4 7. 0 11 the mass ",..ineident to the h maeolti consid 4% 4111 ,.. nee of the C q ',co from the tiattr Alanufactot bal,.pire; and whi h ei leves) no other i'l,: itki ' hiti t h . e pr l i v n i c t i h p i a n lit t y i . !; and that se, t,,, v ! two Periodic !ay that the C i"kos and foreg 4114 'ingdom, it f or :;:a interest tt I n 01 • iso the par' J e tt of the mine Puh.,,, °ti f j.,f,. , ,: b rl.ilt ' ,Liilrh l c,v . r ' lti;..te P lh, l ttl.t,d,i: l; r '' et l ec4gre t ir, ' r ecl ad.rri e tie l' B;s(inafev,a n aold : i,ti s l b nlflihd l m t ioe,t o y ecn i ks.e,.ri t ,w '. ai.s,ai u ;.. e t olest,tiFeo h i t mhlsl i tyi t ito e l o .e.eh l Ead ' l)bai n l e .eiy ' . l n,e,c,E s t , " lta blishment we 4: , respect to 'l,kract of the ti f lb.populi tl 7 thief question 1 0 4 ting circumsti N e kitent to lean ' :,: i t ' t , ,ii. ' 4 4) , , tl 4, l: :: i t t e : l)) l,4 l :ri ' t, ' °h i r. itt t l ava t hil lo itt e .n ie. la n ' n c ceet m t e t :e in o b;a rot s s e h n f i e ‘ de oe , a :0 1 . 1,,, 4 of mankind t,,ifia : li t lt ti L ,lrli P i e d il r o i ef l i as. r n a tet T h l ar t a ilra l e l o s n r u p u ttig , .. P r i h i s l ( ~ t 0 le of nation! E: 1 ‘, 111 ;"—and al' i i :''' It is hi ~4 1,1, equally be ~." affairs of th. , • I titi a l tLuiari th par tit tecuril of .em ' bridal festivit, Nttliful peal and it ;the use of the ‘ k: i.l e::t101:ete, observede s t o p th ri e n B C U il i o ::: tenti lli: : te g , l 3 l r i t t h m e ay det ri oa the kvil .. of that pecu: 1 / 4Li kh he is bout i,,'e men to a j ~rendered impe pee °'e best sou 1 ;1, or in the ,!;' i efor e , respec ,is cause, or ~.'e r ninunicate mCh article* of i I'led faithfully done by the NI a Editor 5 1 °4 aeetnent 1 ®hi ut Mm, in t ' ~ ell alleye corn 11 K at We that did not h b Partim ity ” . _,.. l %Ind the Edit Tl l , c Nt,i first lIIIR ii st 7 t UreS on the 'Y of the Co li i I 4 tid e " Herah tv,,, i .un up to I ap„._' 4 g ; thus c 1-I,;:ra in the I I )ffi d er's, Lette il l t t h e e ioLincol in the Principai " earliest N :11":""o Age r'• New Il e "Linto C ' ufe huses ir I n the chief To Pr intfel for t For tl ~ ' ie. . ~~ - L , k