The Sun. — London, England, 1819-03-29 00:00:00

CIUM. CON.. OXFORD CIRCUIT.—HERTtonv, MARCH 45: THYNNE HOWE OVVYNINIE, ESQ. V. SACKVILLE FREDERICK GWYNNE, ESQ.. 'lbis case has excited an extraordinary degree of interest' throughout the County of Hereto►d, among; persons of the highest rank ; and having been fixed for trial this morning, the Court was crowded in every part at au early hour. The Jury, which consisted of ten special and two connnop jurymen, having—been sworn, Put. Len opened the declaration, which im puted that the defendant had had cr;minal conver sation with the plaintiff's wife. The defendant pleaded that he was Not Guilty, and this wa% the issue to be tried. The damages were laid' at Twenty Thousand Pounds. Mr. s Jeavts addressed the Jury in explanation of the c:rcunistances under which the action had heen.hsoughf. They had heard, he said, from his Learned Friend, the nature of this case, and be %could oake loom himself to say, that a more affeciiiie case of the descriinino had- never vet occurred. He was vet V moult surprised, noon his . • enteaoce into this c ity, to hear that a report Wits in circulation that this cause had been, compro mised. The appearance of the Jury to diScharge dealt functions bad completely falsified that report. Ile did not impute the origin of this report to the defendant ; he (lid not know to whom it was to be attributed ; hut as far as respected the plaintiff, he begged leave to state most distinctly that an idea of -compromise had never in tlie most distant degree entered into his coot etnplat ton. The par ties in the action were very near relations. They nese the sous of brothers. The plaintiff, Mr. Thymie Gwynne, was the son of a Gentleman of the highest respectability, who, he had no doubt, was very well known to those to whom he Lad,the honour. of addressing himself, and who resi.ied at Bucklatol, in the county of Brecon.— The defendant, Mr. Sackville Gevynne, was the , representative of the family of the Gwynness of Gfaubran, and %vita possessed of one of the largest estates in the county, of the value, of nearly 5.0001. a year He was- also Colonel of the Carmarthen Local Militia. He could' hardly find utterance while he told them that the fa ther at the plaintiff had acted as a father to the 'defendant. The father of the defendant died when his son was yet a minor ; and, upon that melancholy event, the lather of the plaintiff re ceived him into his house, and supplied the loss of which Providence had deprived him. "Of course, the parties lived upon terms of the strict est intimacy. The plaintiff matried his present wife in the unity h - of June, 1809, a perifid of about ten years . froni the present time. He was then thirty. His lady was twenty-three: She was young, beautiful, accomplished, and of a noble family. She was the daughter of the late Lord Hereford, and sister to the present Lord. It was a match founded in affection. The plaintiff took her almost without a portion. Her fortune was only 1,5001. in respect of which, he settled upon her 5001. a year. But for the crime of the defendant, she would have been the happiest of woman kind. They settled originally in the neighbourhood of theplaintiff 'a father, where they resided, for several years in the enjoyment of perfect felicity. She then expressed an anxious desire to be settled in the neighbourhood of her noble brother. The plaintiff sacrificed a great part of his fortune to gratify this wish, and be purchased a, beautiful t'esidence called Liandovery, within a short dis tance of Lord Hereford's, where lie resided until that painful occurrence took place which led to the present inquiry. The distance of Llandovery , front the residence of the defendant Was 'thirty miles. Notwithstanding this distance, however, their visits were very frequent. On those occa sions the plaintiff was accompanied by his wife, and the defendant, in returning the visit, by his for he was a married man, and the father of not fewer than nine children. In consequence of the purchase which Mr. Thynne Gwynne had made, he : found it necessary to . make freqiiot jdartfies 6 - London, in order to arrange the corittact. It was observed during these absences, and particu larly_ at the latter end of . the year 1816, that the defendant was a little more frequent in Isis visits 'at the plaintiff's house than he had bes . fore been ; hot, as on the' Most of these'oecae sions he ''as accompanieffhy his wife, the pit:ion of the plaintiff wasnever excited. 11 hap pened in the month of April, 1816, on bhe of the occasions when Mt.Thynne Gwynne was in town, ate'. when his Lally seas upon a visit at the house of the defendant, that an occurrence took place which excited tooth painful feeling. Mrs. Thynne Gwyone had been there in company with. many other visitors. She remained for a considerable time longer shell any other of the guests, having been - stronaly solicited by Mr. Sack Ville Ge)(une * to defer her departure. 'lt was at - length settled, that she shOold return home on the 34 oh Toy. On the mornin g previous to her departure from the .house of the defendant, the delendtaiit wits ob served to come into the room when the Ladies were together, and to hand to Mrs. Thynne Csvvr tie a newspaper. Mrs. Sacks die Ciwyone either saw; or sospeited sh 4 saw, a note delivered with t,he, tiewspapet; to Mrs. Thymic Gwynne, She haa s iify demanded the paper, which was im mediately given - lido her hOnd. She then de- mar: den' the note which she suspected bad been deli 'erect h'y her husband ; but he (Mr. Jervis) believed - this suspicion Was anifottoded ; however, such was its effect at the moment, and it Was With deep regret be was under the painful necessity of 'vat iug the tact, t hat fupon Mrs:Thyo'ne Gwynne denying that site had seen any note, Mrs. Sackville Gwynne struck her a bloW, and culled her - an adultness ! The - fact, as it occurred, was cora snimicated by letter to the plaintiff, at that time in London, although the occasion was. of course not mentioned. - The defendant, anxious fcir his own honour, hastened to town to the plaint ill, t o give an explanation of the matter,-and the plaintiff lost no tulle in rooming home. to 'aseertaio the, with of the occurrence. Upon that occas he condecteti himself, a's heahad ever stone,' with the utmost possible delicacy,. The first pet son wham be coostilted was tile pet son whose honour was most deeply in7ereStcti, Ilatnely, th e b ro ther of the Lady, Lord Hereford.--In consequence of this, the plaintiff, With the Noble Lord, pl°oreesl ed to the house of'the defendant, in order to get an explanation -of What had happened. They were accompanied by the Hey. Mr. Chest on, who had married a sister of . the plaintiff's wife ; and be apprehended' a I•t tter person could not have been selected. The investigation which took place on that occasion terminated by Mrs. Sack vine Gwynne signing the following declaration t— " 1, Mary Anne Gwynne, the wife of Colonel Sackville Gwynne, of Glanbtan Park, in the enulity Of Caermart hen, do hereby declare, that my late conduct towards Mrs. Gwynne, of Lani gan, was most unwarrantable, inasmuch► as that I had never any just cringe for the aspersions I cast upon her character 1 and I most solemnly declare, that I think her perfectly innocent of the impro priety of conduct which I imputed to her, and that I had no foundation whatever for the charges 1 made against her. " Daied May 11, 1817. " MARY ANNE GWYNNE. (Witnesses) " Thomas Mans,ll, Capt. Royal Nary. " J Clieston." Captain Mansell happened to he accidentally present. After this the Jury would not wonder at the plaintiff receiving his wife into 'his arms, and restoring her to his entire affection. The patties did not visit at each otlieC4 lonises after this ; that would have been carrying matters, per haps, a little too far; hut.they met at the houses of mutual friends. They mot at public places, and Mr. .Sacliville Gwynne, the defendant, paid all those attentions to the wife of the plaintiff, which their former intimacy and near relationship fully warranted. The Learned Counsel then entered into a long detail respecting a fresh suspicion that arose against Mrs. Thyttne Gwynne, - of corre sponding with the defendant. After a corre sponde,uce and examination of some length, the result, was the. following Report and Dtclara- Lion : "Hay Costla--,'Nou. 17, 1 317.—We, the under. signed, do hereby declare, that we have this day, at she request of Mr.. Tityitne Gwynne and Lord Hereford, deliberately enquired into all the cir cumstances relative to an intercepted letter, which, though anonymous and without appears, beyond the possibility of a doubtc to have been intended by• Colonel Gwynne, of Glan bran, fur Mrs. Thynne Gwynne, of Lanigan ;_and our clear and unanimous opinion is, that though Mrs. Thynne Gx•ynne has been guilty of great in discretion in having' carried on a clandestine cor respondence with Colonel (Gwynne, yet the letter which is laid before ns does not prove to our minds that any criminality has taken place be tween4he parties. It is observable that no letter from Mr. Thynne Gwynne to Col ! :nelGwynne appears extant. ' We are, therefore, only led by the intercepted one, and by the replies which Mrs. Thymic Gwynne snakes to the questions pot to her, which ail conduce to strengthen this opi nion. If, therefore, Mr. Thynne Gwynne is satis fied wish the professions of sincere penitence Which Mts. Thyntie G:s ynne . now utters before her brother and relations, and with the premises which she makes to study to the utmost to render his life happy, and to atone by her future conduct for• the levity of which site has allowed htrself to be guilty, we are of opinion Mr. Thynne G wy „„, -may safely and honourably receive her back to his confidence and affection. G. CORNEWALL, Jun. 1. B. CHESTON. • WALTER WATKINS." This report was communicated to the plaintiff, accompanied by the following solemn declaration of his wife:— MRS. THYNNE &WYNNE'S DECLARATION. "1, Georgia - 11a Gwynne, do most solemnly pr o . mise before.Gqd, never to have any communica tion with Colooel,g wynne, directly or inflirectly. I do further promise before God, if any letter should be atidriSsed by Col. Gwvnne to me, that. I will forthtyith deliver the .same to my husband unopened.. Shaul;!, however, the letter. he direct ed in a disguised hand, by which means I might be induced, unsuspectioglv, to open, it, I will in that ease, upon the firs discovery of tl,e cottlior, dose the letter, and deliVer the same tb my bus tianil. Unread. " GEOBLIANA GWYNNE." Signed in the presence of Hereford, N ov . 17th, 1817, Hay Castle. Ih..constquence of .this declaration, added to the opinion of those to.whom he had referred a sub ject involving so much of his personal happiness and character, the plaintiff:received his wife again into his arms, and she, ivps,onee more restored to the cortsdence, of all the Members of her family. From Ibis lime, until the month of January fol lowing, they lived. together with uninterrupted happiness: On tile Ist of January they went on a visit to the house of Mr. Cheston, at Glouces ter, and they remained there ahout'a month. On the 25111 of Jana a servant of,Mr. Cheston's came into_ the parlour_ when thewhole fatuity were at breakfast, with two letters addressed to A.Z. which Mrs. Owynne received from the defeudmit, The , hosband suspecting what they wet e, caused 3 - friend to ask for them from his wile. She had taken ample care, however, that they should not b forthcoming,and. in viohrtionof the sacred pled ;c which she had given' in the presence of Almighty God, never to open a letter which came. from the . defendant, she opened these let sets, read them cursorily, and, observing from whom they came, consigned them to the flames: It was no longer a matter of doubt thitshe had received letters from the defendant, in de— fiance of her pledge ; and, of consequence, the plaintiff determined to part with 'her. He did not, however, turn her out of doors, but ,conducted. himself with a firmness which, was really. to lie wOndercd at, after what had been stated. He accompatliedher,himself to town, in order to place her in the hands of her brother, Lord Hereford. Lord Hereford *was front home ; and he left her in . t he, care of' Lady' Cockburn, one of her own sisters, who had married Sir James Cock- , burp.. She remained there with a suitable allow- , truce Made to her by the plaintiff for such a length 'of time as was found agreeab!e to Lady Cock burn ; aod, at last, was conducted 'by Lord Here ford to tlle neighbourhood of his own house, at:d piked in a suilable residence. She continued there until the 3d of June, when, accno , pari , d bra servant, she went to a place called the Do vil's Bridge, on the road - to Aberyst with. She ent ed into pat ticular conversation with the landlady (Aare house at 'which she stopped at that. pine, As to sbe conlit be accotturiot i sated with bostd and lodgice, , , She then proceeded to• Aberystwith. On t'he next day the defendant came to the'Devil'•l4idge, tdok abatements, and introduced the unfortunate Nlrs.,Gwynne as his niece. They affected to sleep in separate rooms, but the landlady proed the 'cunt raty. and in fact the, adultery, not only froth what she had heard in . the course of the night, but from the appear ance of next morning. Mr. DAUNCEY, on the part of the defendant, contended, that althc ugh. adultery had been con templated by the defendant, yet that the crime had never been committed ; ,and therefore that the lendant was entitled to a verdict. Sir Wm. Ganeow summed up the facts of the case with perspicuity and impartiality. The Jury retired, and after an absence of twenty minutes, returned with a verdict for the plain t iii-4)aniage4, One Thousand Pounds, • This' case occupied the attention of the Court fr, , tti I I in the ., motning till nearly five o'clock in tlq, evening, and the Court remained oppressively crowded to the last. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, MARCH /7. INVIOLABILITY , OF A PERSON:S tlOUtia. KYNAS To N V. THE PAST INDIA COMPAVY. Mr. SOLICITOR-GENERAL applied to the Court, by way of appeal, against an order made by the Vice-Chancellor, desiring that such order might be rescinded, as not fotinsled upon any jurisdic tion the Court had. He stated, that a KJ ,had been filed by the plaintiff, the lay-improptiatox of the tithes of the parish of St. llotolph, Aidgate, against the ileCelidoDlS, to compel them to pay the sum of 2s. 9d. in the pound two the rent'or value of certai-n warehouses, called lintnbold's ware houses, as directed by :he statute of .'henry the Eighth. After a considerable degree of litigatioo„ and an appeal to the House of Lords, the plaintiff eventually prevailed, and obtained a decree for his tithei, end it was referred to' the Masster to ascertain-the value of the premises.- It was sworn, that the better to enable the Master to form 'at) estimate as to,the value, ,it would be ne eessary that two persons, of the names of Joseph Sill and William Smith,' should inspect the pre misea. An application was made to the Vice- Cloincellor, who ordered that those persons should enter the warehouses, in order to inspect them, and ascertain their value. This was the order now complained of : he contended that the order was bad and illegal ; that a man's dkvelrin g -bouse or warehouse was ptivileged ; and allieugh this, Court wcadd compel a man to give evirknee against himself, yet its power-did not extend to give a right of entry into his house. It W < true, the Legislature, in the exercise of its onio4latent po7er, had authorised the Office'rs of the Reve nu_e to go into the homes of persons exercising certain trades.;, but the principle did not extend to a case like the present. In this case the value of the thing could only beasee:tained in the usual manner—they might file a bill agrliust the defend ants, and put them to their oath. Sir ARTHUR PIGGOTT ftsllostfed on the same sick; Mr. WETHERELL, in support of the order, Con tended it was founded on b oom! principles. There was no external Criterion by, which an estimate of the value. of the premises could be .made ; the vet• toe of cour , e depended,. upon what, experienced surveyors should say they would give for them, or what ought to be.the rent supposing them to be let. In all cases where, ex, necessitate, idstice could, not be done without an inspection, the. Court would order it. You could wtt bring a house or a warehouse into the Court, of Chancery; as you. could diamonds, pictures, or statues ; and therefore, as the Court could not see the thing ipsis Nadia, it Was of necessity that it should op- . point an agent to inspect. - Alr. Sc.a.icrron-GENERAL having replied, , . The, LORD CuaNcei.Log said, th at as to tpe question, what the Court would . do if it hadjuris, *fiction, he had no (10 OA II 1)011 Shot p4llllt. - lie thought the real question.to be considered would he,, whether, when the Legislature gave 2s, gd. in the pound ()tribe rent or value of a man's - houie, it had not at the same time made a contract he, tweet) the parties which : they were bound to carry fairly into effect. Ou account of the great itii portance.of-the case, and its being an appeal trot the judgment of the Vice-Chancellor, he .should. take a few hours to consider of it, and would de cide it on cowing into Court on Tuesday morning. From the LONDON GAZETTE of North 27. BAN KR T PITY, SUPERSEDED. R. Starbuck, Milton next Grarebemt, boot and shoemaker. BANKRUPTS. T. C. Hayman, Wisbeach, Cambridgeshire, linen-draper, March April 10, and May 8, at ten, al. Guildhall. Soli citors, Me:srs..Sw•eet and Co., Basinghall- street. S. Baker, Brightheliustone, linen-draper, April 3, 10, and May,B, at twelve, at Gdildhall„ Solicitors, Messrs. Lam berts and (p., 2, Gray's Inn-lquare. P. Dalgairns and E. Winslow, St. Mary-at-Hill, ship and insurance brokers, April 6,,20,. and May 8, at eleven, at Guildhall. Solicitors, Messrs. Clarke and Co., SaddlexV hall, Cheapsidc. Bitekland, Langley,. Buckinghamshire, brick-maker, March 20, April 10, and 19 - lay 8, at ten. at Guildhall.: So licitors, Alessrs,Berkeley, Lincoln's Inn. E. Dampier, Puiturose-stiert, Bishopsgate IV,lthou.l,, seed crusher,. March :30, April 10, and :sday . .B, aywaire, at Guildhall. Solicitors, Messrs. llruce and .Son, Billiter square. W. Barton, St. Saviour's Church-yard, Southwark, uphul sterer, April 6, - 10, arid May 8, at ten, at Guildhall., Soli citors, Messrs. Rogers and Sus!, Manchester-buildings, Westminster. J. Whitehrook, Chester, shoemaker, April 10, at eleven, April 17, aiiil May 8, at twelve, at Guildhail. Solicitors, Messrs. I)tt•w and Sons, Bermondsey-street, Sontliwai . h. N. Brooke, Duke-street. Lincoln's Inn-fields, shoe-maw-I facturer, April 8,6, and - May 8, at twelvi,, I‘.lcssrs. Amory and Co„ Lothitry. - , - H. Dunnage, Colchester, wilier, ,April 8, 10, and May 8, at twelve, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. L. Williams, Cursi ' tor-strect. , _ _ A. Barnett, Beiner's-strect,Oxford-street, glass-doter, p„ril 3, 'O, and May 8, at twelve, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Cuppaze, Old Beoad-street. .1. Bourb, Chapil-cn-le-Frith. Derbyshire, common, brewer, , 10, rind May 8, _al two, at Boilieley Arms lini„StOckport. Soljeit ors, Mr. Bad&ley, ,Stocliport, and Messrs. Milne and Co., Temple. J. Whattort, Liverpool, cattle-dealer, April 21, 22, arid May 8, at , rleyen. at the George-ion, Dale-street, Liverpool. Nolieirois, Mr. T. Hughes, Casile-street, Liverpool; and Messrs, Facie and,Co., i'alsgrave,place' Temple-bar. "Tatum and E. I'alnter, Fish-street-11111, paper-stainers April 10, and Mai 4, at teli, at Guildhall.. buliaitur, Hodzson, Old Jtvvry. , „ tnerd w ,A , April 23, 2.3 y and May 8, at ten, at the lira n-inn, low. Solicitors, Messrs. Rosser and Co. Bartfett's - bui ld ' logs ; and Mr. Yates, Wilmslow, Cheshire. W. I)ickinscn, scalhy, Yorkshire, coal-merchant, March 301 at six, March 3,1, ai ten, at the Blue Bell Inn, Scat borough.! and May 8, at ril, at the Talbot Inn, Scarbbrough • „S tdr- • eitors; Messrs. rislier.and Co. 1 - lulhorti; and Mr , W. •" 6- Scarborough. J. Sibley, Abcburch-lane, drysalter, April 3, 6 and May S i at ten, at Guildhall. Solicitor , •• Mr. Birkett, Cloah-iane• • gt W. Turner, Lombard-sttect, stationer, March 80, April and May 8, at ten, at Guildhall , Solicitors, Messrs. J ong and Co. Chai les .sti eet, Covent=ffarden. o T. Hornshaw, Halifax, grocer, Apt it 9, at six, 10, and a? M 8, at ten, at the White Lion Inn, Halifax. Solicitors, .1‘11.:. R. llattye, Chancu rylane; and Messrs. Edwards a nd bnai Halifax. J. Johnson, Sheffield, draper, April 10, and May 8, twelve, at the Town-hall, Sheffield, Solicitors, Mr. Duncan, 8, Holboku-c itict ; and Mr. Tatter Shall. W•'Cllatfiberiaitit Bristol, corn factor, April 7, 8, and 1‘44.• S, at eleven, at the Greyhound Inn, Bristol. Solicitors! Mr. W. R. King, ..erjeanti'-inn ; and Mr. J. H. Franhisi. Bristol. ;I H. Bush, Wick and Alison, Gloucestershire, dealer, Apr .- 7 ; 8, and Nay 8, at eleven, at the Greyhound Inn, Solicitors, Mr, %Y. it. King, Serj,:ants'-inn ; and Frankis, 11; istol. O's T. liellicar and J. Hellicar, Bristol, merchants, and May' 8, at to, elve, at the Commercial Rooms, Solicitors, Messrs. Lamberts a od Co. Gray's-i on ; a nd ' it ' s" Cooke and Co. Br h • • 1 0, R. Miller, Old -street,Fis bookseller, March 30, AP"I s .Lane aat Guildhall Sul_iciturs, u~,les rs• andManl May 8, La at twelve, Macdonald, Frant, Sossex,..-*42iTl;eeper, March • •r ' • to, and May 3, at eleven, at Guil;half, Solicitors, Me"' Yotiog and Co. Lincoln's-ion-fields. 20, G. Thistlewood, "Muscovy-court, floor-factor M ar c h •tarSO April it), and M;:y 8, at ten, a: Guildhall. s.""c' Messrs. Druce and Sbn, Moore. nor' J. W. Burrnester and C. L. Vidal. Ist.t; , chants, April 3, 24, at:d ,May 8. let,, at (4ulid" .. . c C i .s S a s i i C ti e;lt.3 ! 1° a ' a n g! May 8, at one, at Guildhall. Solicitor, M" l ' ; " Berry-strret. • , So R. Motel - Ity, itedsman, April 6 In . . "a" ' A AO, at ten, at Guildhall. Ak s .,rs. , Itoolie and roacS-1p ' irorietor, April 2 ' 11 ,! ) ' 3 1 3 o• 8, at one, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Gorett, °' Ortitard-street. 1 crse 1). Stalker anti A. D. Weleh, March 30., Aril 6, and May 8, at tw.-lvt'.. at Gall'";.. yet ,bhit irs, Mei,ars. liearser ali'd Co. 1:6, r- t.i l "l" 3l4‘'tr within. -DIV WENDS • • . April 20, R. Boyle, 'Upper Thames-cfreet , April 20, R. Orme. Chester,. draper—May IS, , 3.• il r eY 'Lorbc Bond-street, foilki:ure —A printer—A prAl 10. j• Acre, linen-draperpril 17,1. S. 13611 t, fit'• 139 ir ' rers and-}:. Bright, Cov.'ntry, st, Aril 17, R. rison, and A. Viiliiill6oll. tJelf;its-sql„ ~ra -,.0- Jury Axe, mercli . aols--April 17. I. La Parte 3 1 " 13 v ,.„ ( it;:i: 11 ::; st. Chenpside,,waraonseman—May 1, J. Ifi g son, 11" Cheshire, beer-brewer—:April 17, W. C o rral', l' i " r , l' a ° t‘iooe" truvr-werchaut—,April 8, Falkuer MaoLbeA .el: • CE ItTine ATES—...AvaI I. 1 7. . i . Le' P. Caumont, Old 15:•oati-street, merchant —IL 13 " t '' i' r ei - - 4 mington Priors, Warwielishiry, butcher—'f• ist;iettoth al.',if.,-,,,, pool, fat mer:—.J. Ilurgis, Southampton-street. C"'' .9 l -s Vitarf , _ornamental paper manutorturer—J. t' • di, P3 ` Bc . 1,. ' I " South Lamhet it, timber merchant—J. u ',.., •.. Coc--'''', , xnant—d. ulo•bo!,, Witcliff-cross, -put atoe merchaot —J. Butt . vcer .......0.• n K t 11, tz g i i . u ,,alls, Pownend, jun. Atfleiman bury, meta 1 ,1.—J• L '''; ' ,l '-'"' lli" Great. 1.-I,rmitage-strcet, spirit rn,rehnt--11• 1-.1. " - 4 ,;;iore , Islewmtii, barge zoastur-11. 'Taylor, IV i t 1;0') ();st" . Wcalatan--,11. bay, Croacel-lane,-ail broker. I.)T.SOL,VEI). r c oo A. Brown, T. Attron, Nlarsh4:l. and J. 11 - ii` e , merchants—A. M. Pettra, F. A. de C.1!),19 NIA" . 4 ), I)..vid;, J. H. 'n,lor, It. ' and 11. C. baents, Cravt , ad, Kent, printers- -- '' lovvell, E. Hallowell, .1. troiland, and J. itainttp; by, I:orksbi-re, earriers,--W. Yates,..l. Ytite.a, and croft, Pendleton., calico i.iters—L. lh .i'!nltaine and J. -thieu,.Worship-styeet, rating afo-ters—.J. ;11 , f1 ner, Manchester, callen&ters—fl. E. Suntr!vw , u in and `. t.everis, Poultry, auctioneers—J. Lcigli, ju n. and 1,. 11 0 " 111 ,; ( t . ...: Wdnilsworth, coal nterchants—W. fl Ct()Xeli midg. dingtott, Put. Finetion,- Northanivt. , ils;Ji!e, )frotclters., Fletcher and J. Ga , :kell, Cord dealets-11. Maliais and T. Sioith,,Wehber , Itcr i, „,it, friars-load, bakers—W. siepli , .ns and J.. .S.i' 4 3cr, 1/orsetbhire, sail cloth tnanntact;trsrs—J. shave, W. Kershaw; and J. .Attierton, cotton spintieis—J. Kershaw and J...-it!lerton. id4c, Cbe,hine, machine tr.a!zer!--I'c'''-;torr, E. \V. linnJell, T. Big' ge, J. G. 1!,,; - id.‘e, RnwbeFul, Dean.street„ G. FL Ctvcber, tr B id it.• K r .:="*„;_otre , can, merchants--J.. Watkins and J. Pew odi Oxford-road, tin and lion plate tints, She field, Opticians—'l'.Tay..aits and --; r i Leigh-street, Barton Crescent, artists- - i'• Lee,lA, wooistaplers—l'.Cards ven, T. LOngwatth, Man.,:h.ester, ;ilk tnannta'cturer.sl ,:rado s u gar, Su CA R.—The Average - Price of Brown or :' , 'lu sc ' \ welt L e computed from the Returns made m the wee -11dlug ' 24; 1819, is OS . . 4ill. per cat. - ....••-% .......-.____-- BITH. go Friday last, Mrs. Royde, R W Neisig4t o4„„ scPa.t - - - - MATIRIEP- h . Mr. •. „f , On Saturday last, at St. Martin's . Ch , '"'"'. aaog ht ' ' Ilt.aan., of King-strt:et, Covent-gar , ,n, to Max ) ,' • cr') f the late John Canbett,.l47, , q. of "Lewishytt; K en " .dattg • h 0a the 37th inst. John Dawson,. Esq. to Jil: e Y Henry tiniithr, Esq. Eastling-, ent. -----.-----7--- ,gep At Ila , DIED. in )." ber 3 , nihurgh, the lgth ins t. the 27th I. of 'II ` ' l ' s Mrs. l'arkins.m, the wife of John Pariiittsni.),,r:'',4•l3,.oo. jest's COnsul in EAt Prnss , a, and clan;:hter' „WA t. TlitiltlaS. IC ' t , S , ter, E 54. M.V.' in the !ate Irish I'arliaz,L,dt; .. i On that eotil inst.. at his tionse,in• 13'antnant-s.lolooel v` t•i l l ' e lr .2 y- 1 I s ' t — R w t i .:. l, i : :;. t,l i o it l . ' , ( 1 :1 8 ,1 ,t ' o o r o ) t ., . F"..1. 1 u r ti' er I Y i;' u I' t ...> , ......----- • T HS. • TN : v 10' 4 ' . I'IIOVINCIAL BIRTHS, ItIARRIAGF'.:Z. A-- , - in st. l i c" • ntit fq3. ' 1 5'0 At Muirhrove l Hamilton, se.PliA, on the •3antes Ittlx.hargh, pf .i d.'“,,,i,ter ,- ' • , fioneP lB9* 'Op the .7t h• i list— 1 he I..;tdr ef Williain rf 110 0 ' 5 7 h e ir. • Esq. of blanstield and Castiemaini, of a son all • - rLatoty., at Liverpool', Mr. 1 ,, e . t on — Coil b , P . l ::, l :i t i l t t' t .t : r°7 f:;'l.4: II / Li .' i l L l . l: . } t- ' 0 1 O f il l :a C . c irllipt :a II t . : . ""45, to .b.iti -al et, eitli,t.,o. , A cc°. Ifel 3 " 0 1 " j a i. i f:p On the, 3 Itlt inst‘ iit • Cast leilia,triler Cl;iireb, Sa-ztiriliei Cottcr,, Eq., Captain. in tile dot ii Fon t ",,, t a ilowii thlr't cl , tust , ter of the late William Crofts, Esq. ° I ''' ' Lately, at Worcester, Sa t n ut i :: l l L tYldual l t• A. ' l'ore r Lately, at lie seat at, Myth liall, ,garair. Colesltiii, N ' D. ti. !e i l l 'Ohirey ii, her. 65th ypag., Mis. D ' ugditi v, "' ""cr of 1.) gdale, Esq. M. P. for Warwickshire.. ' I at • 1 • .-t,ll;sllete;il(i):N...ft7ii:,iii:::ll,:e,.te.::::g:t'4iyi::.,:l'ill):ll,rurtii.l::tl;Viihtei.l:4l::liii,c) 1:;;11 i ' r 'a e r d a t: o j r 4i:g •! ; • ( -- )1 - 1 riccert conipol,)l7,; of a eolii, and the lullowing morning he vies found dca" his bervalit. ... .. T •ho I, r ( 11. ' : , t t i t ‘ i . i l ' : 3 1 a 4 i : I , h i j , i a si s s : . e , l , :i s i i t: : , : E li n i : ' , l l r's.l:o:tyt.:.(iia)eri.'.ll..:: i l: 1 I t i i S i e i a g iro l (S 1 yea Q. 11'1 ' Stnitt!, E'Nii. late ',ll"entber fur Devizec which isorouga .ie rt• tillLezrtl4nity,ATesßaicavt.s-,l.ltiriieltsoot.n, Curate of St. Philip's, a naLec- E q of' Tuesday, _it.t his ludgin,, - s, in raoh, Sal"" 1 l ' °" ' - 5 -. °I. Ilunitott ; formerly:a Surveyor of the Gener al Pust-Odicc 1 the Westelli District. (Alf ‘V'edues,:ay, :i t iAr r house at the Plotrrel!s, Bristol, F‘ra_iiivv. wile u( :qr. Le ,:erst..y, anti daughter of tLe late 1Z '''''' Waleatn, Minor Call°t, GI Bristol Cathedral. . ~' --, . --- •-------- - Cre"" LONDON: .Printed ityd. B. CARS'I'XIIPi, of Net. e 9, ,:! rl-street, Utivett-suoare; anti published 1. , ." ~',,..,, SCRIPPS, of No. 7, _ South loitoii-street, at Tl4O , _,,,, , • Othce, No.. ite, strand ; iyht-re •Adrei,titents, s"' Lttleti, Zfa. (kt-u.st-paid) must be &lilt -clay& st lt ti t let