The Sun. — London, England, 1819-03-30 00:00:00

II tbo 00 1° f re a ~.ite tiO t , tide tbree rpoff rc otlY ,d rice Or Or iU CP. tlo' eve rt of of mr. Goohi went in fact to corroborate that The advi ce • given by• Mr. Ca . might Carew h to Mr. G ra d y was not such as it [ni vi;itisi deta tions tend e d to excuse i t, and various he thought tot l : s a i r r s ac si y bl e to believe that there had been any against the Hon. Gentleman. lie 4181)tegehn breach co n theiriottfe(i ', l) ,!'st agree With the Resolutions of fact, that a privileges appeared to have but still there Mere circum !uuees of strong mitigation to be urged in behalf : f f th e ti on.Gendeniiin, and there were also some a'4gravation. ‘‘ViShedUpon the whole, he could have forlmtclm an amendment to the motion, but that had been moved appeared to him to be .a 1111,,teCt.fluklitY• if carri e d, they would find the I use guilty, but w ou ld not acquit Mr. Quin in eye s of the nation. he believed that what the Hon. Gentleman had done, had beet) done :jib a corrup t mot i ve, he would say the H ouse :gilt not to suffer him Lb sir within its walls, `ad that punish Which merit ought.' to be applied tb"him was applied to the smaller bribery• The e e 9 ase, how ever, ought to recollect what- ti °l htct had been on former occasions, and not AllO a , the world to say of them that they punish that corruption i n an i n f er i or officer, which,'" ‘ i tv: e at higher importance, was permitted to escape 'tit impunity. t) 4 iii. Nei. begged to trespass for a short time he attention of the House. The subject was °f great importance, and he was sure that the hlse vaould f ee l i t to b e most i mportant —that hi:vas' one which requ i re d t h em to per f orm a duty % ti t ra erely deliber a ti ve , b ut a l so j u di c i a l, and, as te e lik he was sure they would be disposed to ex• same ind u l gence towar d s any one w h o , like 1 1 , 11 , 19 e1f, thought it necessary to occupy some c " '" of th e i r time in considering. the various b a teani stances of th e case . H e should begin by hil li c l lig on e Pert o f ' t h e su bj ect on Which a *Tie auce had been m a d e to hi mse lf personally. This of - t irespecti ng a gap in the correspon d ence. I n one 'e le , ter s o f t h e e ld er M r. G ra d y , which al" t o ' l l ' t . ; (l in the ev id ence, h e pa id many compliments Carew S m i t h, on t h e wa y-i n which he had qa ti ' aged °tie part or the transaction with Mr . . N I These compliments very naturally . sug, ttri ed t h e ProbThilitv of some letters having peen tr lu t i t i e t ) by Mr Carew Sini.h, giving such an ac 14r,1"it of his conduct as would justify these com ( i to i t e , ' ll s• Accordingly a messenger was disatche ata ) ' 4l °ene for any such letters ; but no ne suc h li r t , e4r c "• One indeed was inclosed to him by the " I "tletrto, w h o asked hint (Mr. Peel) to Ni t t e w hethe r he thoualit the interests of either cr,„ 7 requi re d i ts publ i cat i on. I n rep ly to this tr ;;n,+r'tcation he stated, after having examined t r'ia,,l ) `"re was nothing in the letter whit re , saa . -- Lus ptiblication. At the same time he must th y t ,"At• Ht 'vas. nothing in that letter to jos t e c ompliments of Mr. Grady,—(Hear !) e l . 4 . e se comaliruents were not declined by Mr. thou g h he gave no accoont of his eon ithii " 1 . 'he transaction different from that which he 'ail' i l y "u at t h e Bat , of thelJatotike. Haling, 'Ouch, he mnst now t rectal the ko en Iliel, °l 'Le House io some of the statements 4 11 uad ade Andat,- as - to anat. bte , • " m T fi • • .1. Mr. Qain Sim! of die; feint • i n whit. %/761 )1` ' 1 4)ke0 . That tone he was sure the Elbuse -eit,„to think such ', l a - wa s w e lt warranted by the titttUral Ee s iii vas Vaced. It was Imo he wa • • t ltl • ii ,that su c h, .charges should be repelled au g', 'l l,. ll 'grat' ( The Petition began by stat ilj'ettiOar: Mr• l N ) c 7 .y . ndham Quin, finding, at the last °Qtr.', for the 'County of Limerick that his . Il ete s s',: ce had very much declined, had found it i l rY to divide the office of Clerk of the Peace, tt '' i ew of - increasing his influence.. Now, urav i e ) ( l l , 4ll not only that this assertion was not 4 late,,•',uut it was distinctly disproved. The next tir• • a nti , r ,titl • 011 t h e Petition was, that Mr, te a :11 s bed eunsiantly, for many years, supported ter tant t-rs ' uf . Mt•'Q. in the Cotin , y;:by his-whole hola t ,; ant o ,i ni N g to less than 200 free '4llpo's.aail that Mr. Quin wished, to secure this rr r i t Or the future by a regular bargain and '- ..:1118 allegation was also disproved. The 11 1 -! ht.‘ ,allegation "'as, that the disclaimer of exacting Nai r srs• political support was made by Mr. tetentei-Neqaence of the threat of a Parlia hoop4,i"Y inv estigation. It was admitted by his I.. vi as- t ' f , r t a ble Friend (Mr. Wilbraham), that this Proved, although the Honourable Mem '''use motion was before -the House, ev il) n 'alte such an admission. From the tho ngi c e which Wd9 now before the House, he drabt~t `lie , following conclusions must be Qu l r' I - t l iest, th at t h e original, motion of Mr. 1111 liCar livit liug the of fi ce, was not to secure the t ) to ; " Pi' o l t of Mr. Grady. Secondly, that, thin g ,' , "e inter v i ew on the 21 st S eptem b er , no said by Mr. Wyndham Quin, as to his ( .. I ° ,tuli t : t Mr. Giadv's vortical support as the '' ' "itar; il/ 00 Which annuity was. grant ed 4 leSsc til at, on the 10th October, when Mr. Q.min ' a s stated that lie did not stipulate for the n ot 8 4port of M r. -G ra d y, that declaration " = o 'l vert , hi tram any threNt o f a Parliamentary l atil 4ali() ".• As t o t h e first point, he contended, rfice ° le i . great m ot i ve of Mr, Quin in dividing the vtn th p " e rk nt, the Peace, was to be relieved that fr - li "essitv of absolutelY dismissing front h ; %i ce m, • 41 1 at 1 .4. . Grady, who had supported fes s ) is , t he last electibn, and who (he must con tit) reasoa to expect that he woOld• be eon t'ell in t'axiiiedattierel office. On Limit subject he must read S NI , "act from Mr. Grady's letter to Mr. C. September, in which he gives (P. oo \ u "t of a conversation with Mr. Qain eAr„ in that account Mr. Quin is represent tr . L ave said, " WI • r: "'inset,tat is to be done ? I have grail smith, and t t a hpviti t " .3 1_ 1 (1) la 1 r 00 . ) h . .` I ' that promise 1 must make • C Power. • this Mr. Grady Here are two friends who "1"al claims upon yo u ; lii` e 1 5 yea r , h 1 , 11 1 m it to ' c u . ," is now in office, and you turn ;at y ou y o%pp if int the other •; and it is a case bets;:, admit is incapable- of coma • them," • M;, W Wyntl - 7:l l"l ,„ the u " never as in . a situa 1-- Mu c h ' _ Ilev erAlad itress and difficulty ; w i sh ces,'.'uot thiok . a uY thing to do with it, for .1 , i ttift M r. ur _ without pail]." This was the " vt eeasi o „ , ai',l"?;s account of what passed on this W ag said rat not appear from it that One art o f the omit political sn p por t. A not h er evidence deserved the attention of the Horse. Mr. T. W. Grady stated (p. 71.), that " directly after the election I rode out to Adore, thinking► it a matter of course to he appointed, and which I Ohl M. Quin ; Mr. Quin, to my great-astonishment, stated that he dreaded the interview which was about to take place between us." He then stares that an arrangement was talked ot, awl Mr. Quin proposed to allow him _ . . the profits of the office for two years. If therefore this (which was the first offer of confpromise, and proceeded from Mr. Quin) hit) been accepted, it was clear that no political support was bargained tor. Nor, indeed, was it reasonable to sup pose that any such could be expec , ed by Mr. Quin, for suppose that the next election took plate in seven years, what claim would Mr. Quin then have on Mr. Grady for his support for the two year,' profits of an office front which he was removed ? This, therefOre, clearly established; that the original motive for dividing. the office %VHS not to obtain political support. As to the second ptAition, it was clearly proved on the evi dence of the Petitioner himself, tl►n up to the 21st September nothing was said by Mr. Quin of the political support of Mr. Grady being a condition for the. annuity`of '2OOl. Mr. T. W. Grady was distinctly asked (p. 78.) whether Mr., Quin had said any thing to hint about political support, and his answer was, " certainly not." This was decisive on that.. point. The third point related to the circumstances which took place on the 14th • of October. On ,that day, Mr. Wyndham Quin had distinctly stated that Mr. Grady would have the annuity and Might vote as he pleased. Therefore, whatever impro priety there had been in the conduct of Mr. Quin, he had before that time repented of it. But the • Hon. Gentleman tried to do away with the merit of Mr. Quin's declaration on the 10th of October, by imputing it to the threat of bringing the matter before Parliament. Certainly, if the declaration was made under that threat, he must eiletit that it did away with all the grace of repentance. The'llonourable Gentleman sAid that the letter delivered by Mr. C. Smith, dated the Sth of Oc tober, might have conveyed the 'threat of Parlia mentary investigation, and that Mr. Quill 'might have acted wider its infleence. But Mr. C. Smith expressly gave it in .evidence that lie had received that letter, which had been sent to him , o pen, a n d that it did not contain nay threat or hint of the kind. . But then the Hon. Gentleman • seemed to say that Mr. Mansell might have con veyed this threat. It. was impossible to hold to this, for Mr. Mansell in his evidence distinctly stated that it was not till November or December that he heard any thing - of a Parliamentary in quiry. Therefore lie did maintain that it was caieelusively established by Ow evidence before the House, that Mr. Quin was entitled to ail the grace of the declaration made by.hira on. the I.oth October.—(Hear, hear !)—lle must now notice that part of the case which eelated: to the trans action between the 21st September and the 10th October. • In that interval it could not be denied th at M r . Qoin'expected the pblitical support of Mr. Grady. But then the great matter was, bow it was mentioned, and how stated in that instrument which Mr. G. called the indenture and deed. It ap peared that in the conversation on that occasion, Mr. Quin' said, that when he appointed Smith-to the office, it was to hold it during his (Mr. Quin's) pleasure, that: so he Might secure the payment of Mr. T. W.. Grady's annuity--that thew there was a patfse, and Mr. Quin added, " but I expect in return that the Grady Family will remain politically attached to me in the County of Limerick." The whole of this con versation contained nothing implying a pledge ; and if Mr. Grady had accepted the annuity, there would have been no more than a mere' expectation on the, part of Mr. Quits that he would have the political support of Mr.'Grady. But then came the interview of Mr. Carew Smith with Mr. Quits. On this part of the subject he begged that it- might be observed the interview was so licited and pressed by Mr. Carew Smith. He admitted that Mr. Quin went to that interview with the expectation that if the annuity was granted he would remain - on the same footing with Mr. Grady as formerly. The whole impression on Mr. C. Smith's mind was, that Mr. Quin had a right to expect that Mr. Grady, if he accepted the annuity, would continue his political support, and he bad expressly stated, that he thought it would be romantic to expect Mr. Quin would grant the annuity, and consent to allow Mr. Grady tovote,against him. Suppose Mr. C. SMith had beginfaht conversation with Mr. Quin, by saying " I think it too romantic to expect that you .will e,rant this annuity, and at the same time allow Mr. Grady to vote against you." , Might not Mr. Quin have very readily been drawn into a reply.? ." tell you the truth, I do expect, if he accepts the 'annuity, that he will continue to support. me-s — for, as you say, it would be much too romantic to expect that I could allow him to vote against me under such circumstances." If afterwards, next day, Mr. C. - glisith, alter having extracted sects an avowal, came with a written niitiute of the conversation, to procure an aulrentica tion of it, the whole complexion of the case would be altered. The' truth was, that the document in this case, thought not signed, was obtained by Mr. C. Smith at an interview pro cured at his own instigation ; and he wished the House to observe the light iu which Mr. Grady, senior, viewed the conduct of Mr. C. Smith, as to this part of the transaction. ,In Mr. Grady's letter of the 20th October, to Mr. C. Smith, be says, " I know not what part of your conduct most to admire—the coolness and ingenuity with which you led Quin on at, his in terview with you in Dublin, from coquetry to a full declaration of his passion for bribery and cor ruption—the simplicity with which you conducted him to a written testimonial, Btc." He was sorry that Mr. C. Smith did not reject those compli ments.—(Hear, hear, bear !)—He never read a passage more calculated to excite the.sudden indige nation of amen of honour than that in which Mr. Grady, senior, with an odious familiarity of style, talked of how he had led on the unsuspect ing Mr. Quin to commit himself. The words were (p. 105), " 'Twits damned insidious of you, and a great shame, to have asked quits to sign tile deed of charter party," &c. These were the terms in which this part - of the transaction wiS talked of.. Certainly be wished Mr. Quin bad at . _ once told Mr. Grady, jun. that he could not con tinue him in the office. He, disapproved of di viding the office ; but it was to be considered that it was not an unusual practice to do so, speaking without reference to the Act of 1809. But he really believed there was no intention to purchase political support, and that but for the interview, it would have been left to a fair understanding. There Were mine circumstances to be considered in mitigation of the conduct of Mr. Quin ; and he was sure the censure voted by his Honourable Friend (Mr. .Bootle), in such a case, must be considered a severe punishment. He begged the House to recollect, that. on the 10th of October - Mr. Quin repented of his conduct, and expressly released the improper .condition which be had Mentioned. He implored the House not to be. influenced by any. publication which had been made of a letter of Mrs. Grady to Mrs. Quin, which he understood had been printed and cir ciliated yesterday. The CoMMittee of • t he House had examined that letter. and as it did not mate rially bear upon the question, bring ivritten in contidence_frota.one Lady to another, 'it-had been suppressed. He trusted that the House would not be influenced in its . odgment by the artifices of such a publication.—(The Right Hon. Mem ber concluded amidst much cheering from both sides of the House.) Sir J. MACKINTOSH professed he never rose with mote difficulty to exercise what he termed a judicial function than be 'did on the present occa sion, first, because the duty he had to perform was to Lim peculiarly painful, and secondly, be cause the case bad entirely assumed in sonic de gree a different light from the able and ingenious arguments of the Right lion. Gentleman just sat down. He would, however, assure that Right Hon. Gentleman, that no prejudice had been ex cited in his mind by reading the letters alluded to, as none 'of them had reached hito. He was Satis fied however, that so tar this part of the charge had been made out, namely, that one of the Mem bers of _that House had on the 21st of September offered a reward or remuneralion of 20W. for pro curing votes at an election for a . Member of Par liament, anti as such bad been g u ilty of a breach of privilege. An . attempt s had. been made to mix up the transactions of this day with the mi nute of the succeeding day. He, however, should confine, himself, in' determining upon this ques tion, to the inquiry, how far there had been an understanding that, in consideration of this an nuity, Mr.. Quin. was to derive the political sop port of the Petitioner and his Father, together with their joint friends and tenantry ? After this arrangement ,bad been completed, the claims - of Mr. Grady stood on the grounds both of right and honour. As Custos Robs/orunt, Mr. Quin, it had_ been successfully contended, had nis tight to divide the office,• and upon the faith of his promise be could .not consistently displace the Petitioner; nor, after consenting as a narldre term to the annuity of 2001. on the Petitioner's vacating the office; had Mr. Quin any right -io" impose upon him the highly objectionable condi tion so often alluded to. That Mr. Quin had al ways expected the support of Mr.. Grady's family was to be collected most distinctly from one of the . . last conversations at Stillorgan, when Mr. Quin being asked, bad he not made such .a stipulation when offering the 2001. per annum, had replied, " Certainly not ; but amongst men of the world it must have been virtually understood." In the month of •July, a reported change in the Wen tions of Grady family's political leaning hurried Mr..Qnin into an arrangement which, as soon as it verged towards a precise and determinate ao derstanding, naturally excited a desire to be more particulaAly assured of each other's intentions, and the minute of an agreement was the result. hie was happy to agree with the Right Hon. Gentle man in the convictioh, that whatever was due to the retraction of an act so highly culpable, was comprised in the case now - before the House. Mr. Quin became alarmed, and bad retracted froth the agreement. On this subject, whatever had been urged by the Right Hoo. Gentleman oppo site could only have been adduced in mitigation of punishment., 'fhe Honourable Member elo quently panegyrised the conduct end testimony of Mr. C. Smith ;..lta.considered the testimony of Mr. Gould, however respectably he thought of his cha racter, so extremely defective in many instances, that it. ou ght to be Iltogetber expunged, at least froth the recollection of Members when coming to a decision on 'this question. The evidence of Mr. Smith, however, ,was corroborated in every respect by the letters written to Mrs. Quin, and to both the Mr. Graulys. His •anxiety to obtain a minute of the agreement-was natural enolugh,,pa„ be was acting as an agent'merely„ Mr. Quin be ing a principal.—lt was peculiarly desirable to bury the transact ion by' a compromise, end thus defeat all Parliamentary urgency ,on a subject of so much delicacy and danger. ,All these circum stances, taken together, proved the existence of a fact, which had it been persevered in; world ' 'l have brought down the .vengeance of the House on the offender's head, and expulsion would have been the consequence. He was happy to find the corrupt bargain had been retracted whatever might be the determination of the House on the subject, -Ire was satisfied that if a public officer is high trust were permitted to make use of his patronage as a means of corrupt influence, with impunity, It wonld he the most dangerous wound. that could possibly be inflicted on the purity of the constitution of Parliament. Mr. PLUNKETT spoke strongly in favour of the character of Mr. Goold; Noticing the unfortunate, mistakes into which that Gentleman had fallen in his evidence, he was glad that no one had adopted the harsher construction ofimputlng his errors to any thing but failire of memory. He contended that there was no ground for erasing or expunging the whole of Mr.Goold's evidence for any mistakes in some parts of it. On the same principle, they would exclude that Gentleman's evidence on every future Occasion, and brand him as a person totally unworthy of credit.. . There were four • material points as to which the evidence of Mr. C. Smith and Mr. Goold differed. First, as to whether the refusal • to sign the minute on the 22d September was by Mr. Quin or by Mr. Goold--2d, whe ther the refusal went merely to the siguatore ar to a disavowal of the accuracy of the docu ment--3d, whether Mr. Quin-bath stated that he would be always lead)' to prove the accuracy of the minute, though he, would not sign it-4th, whether Mr. Quin did, on the '22:i Scpteniher, at any interview at which Mr. Gooti was pre,ent, acknowledge that Smith's account, which represented the • proposal of political support to have originated on the part of hint, Mr. Quin, was correct. As to the first, the poSitive assertion of Mr. C. Smith was, that before Mr. Quin had time to answer him, Mr. Gookd said he had ad- vised Mr. Quin not to sign the minute. This, howeve, seemed to be contmlicted by the mi- note itself, 011 the face of which' there was this memorandum, stating. that " for certain reasons stated to me, he (Mr. Quin, that being the next an tecedent) refused to sign.". But Mr. C. Smith, in his evidence (p. 60), explains, that by " he," he meant Mr. Goon!. But by the letter of Mr. C. given in evidence (p. 20), be expressly refers the refusal to Mr. Quip, and imputes it to his alarm in consequence of Mr: Grady's letter.— Here was the first matetial point of thtf:oetice in the evidence of Mr. Gook! and Mr. C. Smith, yet it appeared both from the minute and Mr. C. Smith's own letter, that the explanation was wrung, and that Mr. Goold was correct. This he did not state by way of imputation against Mr. C. Smith, whom he believed to be quite incapable of misrepresentation from Improper motives. It showed, however, the fallibility of Mr. C. Smith's • own • recollection on a most material point.—, (Hear !)—the second difference was relative to the signature of the minute. ACcording. - to Mr.. C. Smith, the sole objection of Mr. Quin was ' to signing the minute, and not .to its accuracy.— And Vs refusal was stated to be because the office was one connected with the admiuistrae - tion of justice. Yet the objectiou was mere ly to the signature, whilst the transaction itself was admitted. Could any man believe that this was the motive—that he would confess the cul pable gift in the presence of several persons, and then ref Use his signature as affording evidence of it ?.---(llear, hear l)—The next point of d.ffer ence clearly shewed the. .absurdity of this epic sentation—for, according to Mr. C. Smith's state ment, Mr. Quin, while he refused his signature, offered on all occasions to attest the accuracy of the minute. Now as to this he must say, incredu lous odi—it was not to be believed—that the guilty offer should have been acknowledged—that the signature should be refused 'as evidence of it ; and then, in the same breath, that though he 're fused ,to sign, he offered en all occasions to' attest the accuracy of . a written account, syt ing that the guilty offer which had been made was too much for any credulity. It was absurd..lt was impossible to believe it ; and as it was quite clear that. as , to the first point of difference Mr. C. Smith was mistaken, so he was also mistaken in the second and third.—(Hear, hear, hear !)—This brought him to, the fourth difference—as to tine. condition of support having originated with Mr. Quin. lii p. 60, of the evidence, Mr. C. Smith expressly states, that the 2001. a year would not have been. accepted if it had been coupled with any condition for political support. He recalled the attention of (lie House to the memorable conversation so often referred to. In that there appears to have been a long pause. Ile should 'like to have heard what passed during that inter val, but Mr. Carew Smith endeavoured to ,make the .supposed heads of it. Had he (Mr,. P.) known, what really passed!, he would have been better enabled to elicit the „subject. But what ever was alleged on the occasion, he was of opt nion that the party (Mr. Quit)) ought; net to be crushed ; and therefore, believing Mr. Quin free from any thing but an act of indiscretion, be felt himself emboldened to stand forward in Lis de fence. lie had... not been guilty of any breach of privilege, neither ought be to ,suffer for the mis conceptions of others, He referred to the evil. nce of Mr. Roche,Mr. Gabber, end others, in vin dication of his assertion. Whenever pressed upon the part of Mr Grady, heyesisted his importu nities, and refused to enter into any eempact. Mr, ,Quin positively denies having entered into any stipulation with Mr. Grady ; and, in addition to the evidence of Mr. Roche and Mr. Gobbet, they had in the evidence of Mr. Grady himself ample proof of the innocence' of Mr. Quin. From pure beneficence, the latter had offered Mr. Grady the younger 2001; a-year, as a friend, and totally free from all political bias. He believed the proposition which had caused the diSpleasure of the House had riot originated with Mr. Quin, or any of his friends, but from Mr. Grady himself, or ,from Mr. Carew Smith, his agent. Thence arose Mr.'Quiu's apparent sanction to it. " I give you (says Mr. Quin) 2001. a year, free front every stipulation." It was Mr. Quin's,own bounty, and he had a right to gratify himself in this particular. There was no criminality in it. In his opinion it 'was an innocent and, a warrantable transaction. If any blame was attachable to Mr. W. Wynd ham Quirt, it arose from his suffering himself to be decoyed, or misled into such a transaction. — What would we have done had.tbeproposition ori g inated with Mr. Wyndham W. Quits ? As a Member of Parliament, he would have been ex pelled the House, and been also deprived of his office of Cuatos Rotulorum. But he bad conducted himself in a very different manner ; and he (Mr. Plunkett) slid not feel disposed to allow his one mies the triumph which they expeCted. He be stowed several encomiums on Mr. Carew Sten!) as a Gentleman of great resPeetebility, although iii this inst ante be might be said to have made some ,unaccountable deviation front propriety: Front every view of the subject, he could-'not consent to the,Resokueion of the G diem General, es ceneure , ing the conduct of Mr. Quin.—(The Ilott. MeM ber was loudly cheered.) Mr. WY N N said,, there was, no Man on whose judgment he would sooner rely than on that of the Right lion. and Learned Gentleman who spoke last, tint after the most anxious investigation of the evidence,. he had come to a different conclu sion. 'hie admitted that this proposition might have come originally from Mr. Grady or nisi friends, but the agreement seemed, if confidence could be placed in the evidence of Mr. C. Smith, to have , been completed, and that 2001. a-vear was to be given on condition of Mr. Grady's Par liamentary support. This was an offence of bri bery and corruption which was punishable, not only at common law, but also by the ste,oite of • Geo. 11. He then entered juin an examination of the conflicting nature of the evidence of ;gr., I , of hiin t to the i 10 1 , iiici s ted les* - ititY ovs'' tie of tsc 1 Vir-, Yeace froui d'l ce P er id reit ai sod • tl l9 'sta . 7fee" thi‘ the sod ti er i o ns ~list 0 or 1i she" (11c oatir rt ed, oti 6' 1131 i f. Wl' 009. it II -; `v-