The Sun. — London, England, 1819-03-27 00:00:00

UOUSE OF. COMMONS, Alar.cti 26. Sir R.Wit-Ltams presented a Petition from Car tarroashire, against passine the Menai Road Bill. CRIMINAL LAW. _ SirJAstas MACKINTOSH presented two Petitions, - .praying for a recision of the Criminal Law ; one from the inhabitants of the parish of Ogderi, in • Lancashire, the other from the inhabitants of the town of Epping.—Referred•to the Committee now sitting on the subject of the Criminal Laws. SALT DUTIES. Mr. CALCRArT presented a Petition from cer tain individuals at Malden, praying for a repeal of the Salt Duties.—Ordered to be printed. COPYRIGIIT ACT. Mr. JOHN SMFTHpreseoteda Petition from :Messrs. Lackington and Co., of Finsbury-square, praying that the Copyright Act might he revised. The petition stated, that the petitioners had lost, within a very shr , rt period, the sum of 2,4541. owing to their having to deliver I I copies of every work which they published, SCO'!'S IiPIIGHS Sir .1. lklAcKtvrosn said, he helti in his hand a Petition from the Royal Burgh nt Dnrntrirs, plhining of the present system of electing NLigi sttates in that Burgh. The petition, lie took upon I imself to say, was signed by its tw;st respectable aim considerable inhabi'ants; and, he - felt him.selt huund iri justice to add, that the principles on whkh the prayed for redress were strictly con stitutional, unmixed kviJi any of those wild and vis . ion , iry theories which had Si) mach ithited the enti C of reform. The population Of the Roya ! but ghs, x?as 40,000. Of. these 410,000 had pe- t itioned for a room itt the pt et.ent s yst Of the retnainiug seye.ty thoi,s:iud, it was In bf obterved, that though th,ey bad not peti, !lotted in favour of such a measure, yet they hall nut sent lip a single petition, or signed a solitary resolution against it, however dependent any part of 'item might he supposed to he on the will of those who wished to preserve the present system. It ever, therefore, there was a question on which the public voice of those interested in the issue was most unequivocally declared, it was that to %illicit the petition which he had the honour to peseta advetted. Mr. MAITLAND ohsetved, that the more this subject was agitated and discuised, the more evi dent would appear the general opinion of the peo ple of Scotland in favour of a Reform, which should put an end to the notorious grievances of these l'eftioners complained. Amongst other causes of complaint, the House had only to advert to the manner in which, when vacancies happened in the Magistracy of the Burghs, they were supplied. It was the present practice for the rentaining part of the Council, and not the Burgesses, to make the election.—The petition was !lieu :read, and ordered to lie on the table. Mr. WILLIAM DOUGLAS presented a Petitintralso front the Burgh of Annan, praying fot a Burgh Iteforrn.—%Ordered to lie on the table. INSOLVENT DEBTORS Mr. LAMBTON presented a petition from the Deb:ors in the Jai( of Durham, against any Repeal of the Insolvent Laws.—Ordered to be referred to the Committee on the Acts. • NEW SOUTH WALES. Mr. BENNET communicated to the House that the motion which he intended to brine forward that day, for an instruction to the Committee on Nils to enter on an inquiry► into the state of the Cololly of • New South Wales, was now unne cessary, as he was glad in being enabled to state that the Comtnittce bad since decided on the pro priety of that investigation, and would proceed on it on Monday. BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. Lord A LTHORP stated to the House his desire to communicate an •occurrence, of which, as in volving a breach of its privileges, be felt it'bis duty to lose no time it, putting them in possession. 1340 re the Select Committee on the Worcester Election Petition, a soldier of the name of Wm. Stinton, of the ist Foot Guards, was examined. It appeared that in the lobby of that House this soldier was arrested by a military Officer, on the ground of being that day absent from his military duty. As soon as the transaction was made known to the Committee, it was presumed that no further step would be taken against the witness, and that it :would be unnecessary for the Committee to mention it in their Report. He had however since understOml that the Man had been flied by a Court Martial and found guilty. He was not aware (whether any punishment in consequence of that trial had taken place. The proceeding '• probably had origiumed in a mistake, but it amounted un doubtedly to a breach of privilee'; and of all breaches those committed by a militaty authority called for the most vigilant aitention of that House. Having mentioned the circumstance, he wished to leave to the opinion of the House itself the mode of proceeding that ought to be adopted. The lion. Colonel TOWNSEN D said (as far as the Hon. Member could be understood, who spoke in a low tone), that the soldier was arrested by a seri?.ant, not for his having attended tl►e Com mittee, but for the breach of a military duty. The serjeant heard he was gone to the ltibby, and fol lowed him there. The man had behaved very ill when arrested by the serjeaut, and had run away front hint. lie har t ] been tried since by Court Martial, but as he did not command the regimen!, he did not know the sentence. A MEN'S ER, whose name could not be !ea►rned, said, the arresting a soldier in the lobby of that House, he being a witness, seas a breach of pri vilege, and thought the House should adopt sonic measure to vindicate its jurisdiction,—(hear !) Sir M. W. ItIDLRY said, there could be no 4ionbt that the privileges of the House were vio late:l. Some step must therefore be adopted to expuss its disapprohaiion, General Putris ohserved, that it was not for his attendance at the Cwornitiee the soldier was tried, but for a dbtioct m;litary ()Wrote. _ _ 11 r, TiF.RNrY said, the,military offence of the soldier was not the conii(leration. The goe•tion was, had this man b-en obstrncted in that free egress anti rt-gb - ess to which., a witikess, sum moned to give evid,-itee before a Committee of that douse, h e was cntillvd ? If that •obsttnction had been given, and that was admitted, it was im possible-but that the House should t Ake some step. if it did not, its silence would have the effect of isteVentiug pAirlculasiy, from attending, when their presence and evidence wcre necessary to the examination of. any ques tion before that House. Mr. BECKEIT spoke a few words in so low a tone as not to be audible in the Gallery. He w a s understood to say that the House should take no tice of the proceeding, but that he believed the offence fur which the soldier was tried was wholly of a military nature. _ Mr. .11gNsET wished to have the Minutes of the Court Martial produced. They would shew the exact o►tfence on which the soldier eras - arrested. The Honourable Officer (Townshend) said, he did not know the sentence, or whether the man was punished. To be legally punished, he must have been legally arrested ; b►►t he was arrested in the lobby of that House, which was nu illegal arrest ; and if punishment followed, no matter what the offence, it was au illegal pu nishment. Sir C. MoNck considered this a violation of a most important . privilege. The House, was bound to protect its witnesses, and it, doiog so it only he same power which every Court of Ju s tice possessed, and when necessary exerted. ,t'ir JAMBS MACKIN-I'ost( observed, th it every Membrr must adroit, that one breach of the ori vilege of that House had been committed. Anti a mote serious violation of its authority could not be tm,sgined than the forcible arrest of one of i , s witnesses, within the lobbies of that House, by a military - Officer. If the house a few nights back felt it to be its itisperative• duty to punish a pri vate individual (Mr. T. G. Grady) for a mere threat to e witness in attendance by its order, on what pretence could they-soff , .r to pass with im punity, and without . notice, the forcible arrest of another - witness, and that too by military autho rity ! It was, therefore, with the greatest sur prise he turderN?ood the Military Law Adviser of the Crown (Mr. Beckett) to extenuate the con duct of that military Officer, on the 'ground of his ignorance of the privileees of that House, in other words, of the law of the land. That exte nuation was no sort of justification. It would be a most monstrous doctrine to send abroad, under the sanction of the high authority of the Niiiitary Law Adviser of the Cro%vo, that violations of its privileges by Military Officers were to be excused, because the persons violating. were ignorant of those privileges. He (Sir J.) telt the House should issue an order for the attendance of the Serjeant, and it the Sol.lier was under attest, to have him also produced. Mr. BECK ErTT, in explanation, said that the Hon. Baronet Was wholly mistaken in supposing that he had ,extenuated the conduct of the Set jeant, on the ground of his ignorance of the pri vileges of that House. As to the Court Martial, he understood it was solicited by the soldier. Sir J M ACKLNTWtt said, the contrary-was the impression of himself and his friends near hint, and he was_ glad he afforded the Hon. Member the opportunity of removing it. Mr. BENNET said, it was probable the soldier solicited the Court Martial, because he would have been flogged without it. After a few words from Mr. Wm. SMITH, Lord AlnaParli tnoved, that in consequence of an arrest of a witness of that House on Satarday last, the Seijeatit of the Ist Foot Guards, who was em ployed to arrest him, be ordered to attend on Tuesday next. Mr. IV. WYNN said, that though not in his place when the discussion commenced, he Lad heard sufficient' to convince him that to delay so important a subject to Tuesday was extremely ob jectionable. He felt the imporance of th e sub ject, fixed for Monday, still be thought the present question could not be postponed. Ott a former case of an arrest of a witness by a civil officer, the House proceeded forthwith. Ile was fully of opi nion the same course ought to be followed in the present instance.--(Hear, hear !) Colonel BARRY suggested, that as there was no proof at present of the Serj:fant's being employed, that word should be left our. The CHANCKLLQR of the EXCHEQUER acquiesced in the opinion, that the motion should he for the House proceeding forthwith in the ; and it being thus amended, the motion was agreed to. Mr: BENNET could see no objection to the pro duction of the Minutes of the Court Martial. After a few observations from some other Mem bers, it - was ordered that W. Stinton, the witness, be also ordered to attend forthwith. KING'S TAXES. Mr. BENNET presented a petition from a person named Edward O'Hara, to which he begged the attention of that House. The petitioner, like many other persons in this country, .was unable to pay the King's Taxes. Innead of a distress on his goods, a warrant was issued against his person, and be was committed to • the gaol of Newgate. He continued therer.for ten days, confined in the same room with felons, some of whom were since transported, and others were executed. He was at length taken up by a AVrit of Habeas Corpus before Justice Bayley, who at once, seeing the scandalous irregularity of the proceeding, order ed him to be discharged. It. was no remedy to the petitioner for the loss he sustained in his good name—for his alienation from the comforts of his f a mily—it was no remtftly to the English people whose tights were invaded, in the treatment the petitioner received, to know that• he had the power of bringing an action against the Magis trates who committed him. The petitioner might have been committed to the Debtors' Prison. It was a common prison, being under the jurisdic tion of the Sheriff. Such treatment was a great grievance, and the petitioner was right in laying his case before that House, which kept a Com mittee of Grievances always sitting. The peti tion-was then received, and ordered to be printed. Sir H. PARNELL moved the second reading of the Menai Road Bill. A considerable discussion arose, in which 'Mr. Huskisson, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Mr. Peel, Mr, Bankes, Sir J. Newport, Mr. Curwen, and Sir H. Parnell parti cipated. Eventually _the Bill was read a second time, and ordered to be cothmi,rted. BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. The SPPARFR acquainted the House, that the Serjednt of the Guards, who and been ordered to the Bar, was in attendance. The Soldier had ttot yet arrived. Was it the pleasuli of the House to cal! ; 11 serjeatlt, of to wait tin both ge: jea t and . Soldier could make their appearance ? Mr. \YYN observed, it would be rattier awk war4- to examine first the one and thin the other. • The SPEAKER said, lie understood they were both on ditty in the same guard at Chelsea. AD interval had taken place between the Orders of the House commanding their attendance, and it was probable that Do longer intetval would occur between their attendance. Lord AGTHORP was not aware that there vvotild be any necessity to examine the Soldier. As the Serjeant was in attendance, if the House pleased, lie might he called in and examined. The Serjeant was accordingly called in, placed at the Bar, and underwent an examination by the Speaker, and by various Members, to the follow inz effect Q. What is you name ?—A. Thomas Harvey. Q. What are you ?—.l. A Serieant cif the Guards. Q. Of what Regiment I—A. The ist Regiment of Guards. Q. Did you come to Westminster on Saturday in search of ,tinton ?—A. Yes, Q. Under whose authority ?—A. That of the Serjeant- Nlairir. Q. Where did von find him ?—A, On the steps of the Hall. Q. What did you du when you found him ?—I asked hint what he was about. Q. What did he say ?—A. He said he had been examined and was done with. Q. What di: i you then do ?—A. I took him•away. Q. Whither did you carry hint ?—A. I was taking hint to quarters, but he ran away. Q. Did von take him again ?—A. Yes. Q. How soon ?-41. In a quarter of an boor. Q. What did you then do with liar ?—A. I delivered hint at quarters. Q. What became of him then ?—A. I reported him to tho Serjcant NT.ajor. who.gave orders to hare him taken to the barriteks to he CO, i third. Q. What became of hint at the barracks ?—A. I left him there. Q. You Lave stated that you received orders so take S:in ton'to the barracks from theSerjrant Major. %via is the Serjeant Mejor's name ?—A. Sutton. Q. Did ran state to the Serjeant Major the I eason for which yon arrested Stint au ?—A. Yes. Q. What was that reason ?—A. For bettig absent from the defaulter's drill, at nine in the morning, . Q. Fine Stinton been since tried Li) a Court Martial ? A. l'es. 0. On what charge ?—.A. Os) the several charges of alk serti- g himself-without leave from the defaulter', drill, oi, the morning of the 20th ; of escaping front my custody; kind of haying ~tolen a piece of cloth front tne. 0. Did the Serjeatit-Majiir desire you to come to'he of Commons fur the purpose of apprehending Stioton-2 (a. What instructions did yon receive from the Serjeant- Major ?—A. To take and confine hitn. Q. Did you receive any particular instructions where to seek him ?—A. I was to bins where I could. Q. Did the Serjeant-Major say that the man was ordered to attend a Committee of the House of Commons?—A. No : not at all. • Q. Il'hrti was it that Serjeant Harvey first discovered that the cloth had been stolen from him by the man ?—A. On the day on which he was confined. • Q. After his - arrest or bcfu•e ?—A. After. Q. Ilow lon before was it that you discovered the loss of the cloth ?—A. Five days. Q. Did Serjeant Harvey know at the time of the arrest of St ii ton, that he had taken the cloth ?--A. (as the witness was understood to say), I cannot answer without cons;deration. Q. When did Serjeant Harvey first discover that he had lost the cloth?—A. The same dap can which I lost it. Q. When was it !'.tat you discovered that Stinson had taken it ?—A. After he was arrested. Q. At what hour was the defaulter's drill ?—A. At nine o'clock in the morning. Q. How long did it, last ?—A. One hour. Q. Diq the man at the time be was arrested state that his absence from drill was occasioned by any particular circum stance ?—A. Only by his- being obliged to be here.at half past eight. Q. To whose squad does Stintoa belong ?—To no squad. To Captain -- company. Q. To what Non-commissioned Officer was it his duty to apply for leave' of absence ?—A. To any. Q. Did he to von ?—A. Q. Was part of the charge prefared avinst hint at the Court Martial his being absent from the drill ?—.l. Yes. Q. Mil he state to the Officer that his absence was occa sioned by his attendance on a Committee of the House of C011if1:011S ?-A. Yes, be did. - - - - - The witness was here ordered_ to wi;hdtaiv. Lord . ALTnottp observed, that it was given in evidence, that the first charge against the soldier was his absence from drill, in .excuse for which he' gave as a reason the necessity of his atund• ante on a Committee of the House of Commons. On the face of the proceeding there appeared to be a Breach of Piivilege ; and conceiving that the proposition Of his Hon. Fikrid (Mr. 13.nanel), for the prodriction of the minwes of the Court Mar tial, was most proper., he : should move, that the minutes he pr,duced. • Lord PaLsiERSTON said that he was informed the man refused to say where he had been. The SPEAKRR here interposed, observing, that he understood Stojeatit Maim' Sutton was in at tendaoee to give evidence, and recommended that the Noble Lord ab sullen(' his motion until after the Serjeaot Major's examination.. Lord ALTHOFF acquiesced, and the Serjeant Major was e i tiPed to the Bar.—He stated th.tt -he sent Serjeant Harvey in pursuit of William St in ton on Saturday last, on account_ of having been a defaulter at drill on the morning of that day — that he was first taken abopt 2 o'clock—that Setjeant Harvey repotted that he found W. Stinton in the House of Commons, where, he said, lie had heen summoned as a witness, and that having taken William Stinton into custody, he made his escape, 'was pursued, avid taken—that Witness or dered him into confiuement, and reported the case to the Adjutant—that when he was question ed by the Adjutant as to the cause of his absence, he turned round in a very contemptuous manner, and said lie would not answer any questions ex cept he was brought to a Court Martial--that the Adjutant said he would report his case to the Commanding Orticer of the regiment—that William Stinton was confined and brooght to a Regimental Court Martial. Q. Upon what charges ?—A. 1 cannot speak exactly as to; the charges; 1 night be ittaccuraW if 1 were to attempt to star thew. What was the result of the trial ?—A. He was found guilty of some of the charges brought forward against him, but be was SllbjeCtr , l to no punishment. Question be Sir CuArtax.s. Ai°NcK.—Did the man male the same excuse to the Adjutant which he had made to you ? A. He said to the Adjutant he would answer no questions. Question he Sir CITA R I.F.S NION CK, hart.—Had, witness re ported to the Adjutant the excuse which the man made to hint ?—A. (After some hesitation) No. Question by the SPEAKER—Did the witness report to the Adjutant that William Stinton said he was absent front drill in cousequenct , of having been summoned to attend the House of Commons?—:l. (After a pause) I am not certain whether I did se or not. Question hv Mr. C. WYNN—At the time you ordered the man into confinement, did you know that he had been in at tendance on a Committee of the House of Commons I had reason to believe so, from the report I received from Set - - jeant Harvey; bat I understood at the Sallie time that his altcndance here did not 'uteri - A:re with his duty as a suidier, which lie ',ad ne2lect ed. Ques►ion by ?!r. C. %Vs.Ns—Did witness see the summ - ins received by Stint(in, req u iring his attendaneeon a C,lllll, ti of the House of Commons ?--(k. 1 saw a paper lu Stinton's hands, but 1 did not examine it. _ _ "I'liea i!ness ltAvitig ordered tty wit'odraw, Lord AiTtICEF vaid, i, iatUr qipetircd from the 0 :;( 1 ente eoiAntrhetit at),l ;: tl orv"''"'. Stiutott had not been on'acconitt at te , 4,` as a witness before a Committee of that IS o"`' but on account of bib contemp!ltous bei;‘" i '" lr t afterwards. But as this matter itur:oil.'"" doubtful, it would be. desiratilc, a t m t h e mitittle3 of the Court Mattid be I,id before the Iloose..":" The Noble Lord then tnade a o w - l ido• to that .purpose. Mr. BECKETT (Jthlge AdvOCZI!e) C MltCrided th at unless a particular ground was made out for th . d production of the proceedings of (till CMIII Mar- Hal, the [louse ought not to agree to the motion, There was nn evi;lence before the House tc"' :.ill4 o to silew that the continctueut auti t r ial o f was any way connected with his attendance as winless here. • . -titg Mr. TIERNEY said, it was 'precisely bPeame. , House were in doubt who her his arrest and cb a . : fi' ement l w ere ()ecasionvci by 1 is -attenda nce as 7 witness before the House that they svished to have the Minutes of the Court Mar , ial. could conceive no possible objection to t he pr 4 - 1-I' retdil, ducion of those Minutes. Mr. Goutatint4 said a few words, which wei inandible in the Gdiery. in M. G. W. ‘Vrs:Nr A:lid, it had been ststecik evidence, that ,Sinton sa;d, win:n he was ta ., e l into ensto h dv, his absence was occasioned e summons he had received to attend Cffilirrit,ttd Of tie no.)—This era' the p oint be cleated It wa s ce rt a i n ly a bre-01° 4) ) con f PI:" %Hoge, it tie prison who ordered him ild," e i f ly inentent knew'•that Liwitnesss absence tva , oce rof his attendance as a oo a C"" -t(ce ti'!louse. c fine" Colnud TOW NSA! END stated, that keo t7 ay it , w atiod !i si a oc e o r t w etserq: behaving t it ce O ti It t c a o v i t :l t g av u p ,. ( ;, 0 . s a manner. Mr. C. W. IVYN:f.4 Wisbek' to know . ." I ' elher he ' w ,, s (tied thfrely Ott account of his 111:st°" w " 3s -t running away from the serjeant. point of great consequence. . a ttif e ow u ncl 1 oNstsEND was then exttm's -- , d 13.,r,.,r, and stated su nwh bstace at ht= had 040 d ; / toentioned in his place. • to Lord ALTHORP said, it was st ill neces" . ' o f have the Minutes, to ascertain w brther ( ' ►te e the charges against Stinson, tS'a9 :10r 41) ,:f en I i I from drill when he attended a Commi ttee House of Commons. . woof) rather thought they were to re OM of their way in wishin, t o ge t- these illiwa' t L ais lie thought it was Inky f or t he kilo' tis4t- of having been summoned to attend ! he 11 ; `, " , 'se t eot Commons had treed him from t he P""'',,,:hg which his misconduct deserve(,. j3` aYl,r.sre`t they hail better proceed no ftirther. canseof that Siillton wetted he wont,' not tell the his .hence till he ,was before a Court .I ‘ /a L'AIE he seemed therefore to have brought the Aiartial on himself. w Lord PALMRRSTON wished to knO . WP lie Ot as there were th,ree charges against on account of his absence, another "" of his misconduct when with th e s el ietort , !bird for making away with his I) 3 "" l ' '"s )ar t ° it . v i v i ould trot hr sofficient to have those of minutes which had any relation to the 41' 4°1 lion of Pt ivilege ? • Lot d A ..1-Tnorip expressed ti wish to have d ie wl;ole Minutes. Lord PALVEIISTON expressed a dercrrilinati nt . o° • oppose the production of he r .. 1 , 01 ,! o f t h e Minute g : The Gal-lery was titer cleared, for a divisio, li"1" • none look 'place. and the motion was negatived' ARMY ESTIMATES. St into o, ITh e ilonse resolved itselt into a Commi!tee Supply and Lord PALMELISToN MOved grants . for army services for tile year .091,`",' were agreed to. The House then ge..i4llo`" be the Report of the Committee was ordered 'u • brought op on MItr;.GE ACT. of Alt Dr. PuttArsioat3 t he second readiori,is. the Marriage Act . A ,„,„d ifie - iit 101. vi "e ve"Wit intention move• the commm i,ent G f o ft ow, with m a view to re-comittoe''' "k e n uuderstauding that the dc is - uss ioo "" tild " place o? . 3 110%1 7 1:;S e O anti the S s N ta" r e. oticl T " -aFs°'‘At. Sir expresied themselves avets.rto the Bill. 1 311 1 . Mr. Serjeant Ossiow • ved of -I ' l- tr. The Bill was then reaad)-a"scrond t e ; ,• tilted ; the Report brongi,t to) and orilelc" taken.into further considelatio i n thi 4 : t Y d. night, and the Bill as amended to he fro' • ti Mr. DICKINT‘ON moved the further co"' Th e on of the Qnarter Sessions Division - 13 ' 11 .--- Bill was re-committed. Sir (;" After a short conversation betweon the 11‘1.)-IleonrIle:secek, Mr. , c i o a k itirtia(yitnl.l'ea aril Report C• `' t a 1 °l.d'eettYre,' ived on The House went into a Committee on k , o det e ct alies Ditties,- and agreed t a resolution ft•ir. j ion, the Report of which wa s or be eceive I on Monday. er T ad Or Prize 'Monev Distribution 13 111 ) 3 : scion(' time : he committed on Ifj""`;`1;:d to be The Scots Savings Banks Bill was niller read a second time on Monday. It Lord LOWTHER moved fora new' wr--- f o r AP' h 110 pleby, in the room of G. Elmlyer, Esq . sv " -° ' arcepred t F he Chiltern Hundreds. - o f tbe Lo • 1 _,BRINGTON 1110Ved tor acco unts Horse Dotiei since ISls.—Oldeted. VoTERS' OATHS.brrn Mr.:W. Wit.itAms direct for leive (o in a Bill to extend the. Law din 4 oath s 1( ' taken by Frecitold'Voters in Couotie s, sons voting in behalf of Freehold.' in or" rt ,c; and Cities ; and also to impose the g 3ti r: • C Voters of all descriptions, of taking an n at , i ' ," 1 1) :c t hey P"sscssed the right in belialf . of may vote. The Bill WaS nut to alter the -I, the land as to any part of the right or vot , r ! ! to give the security' of an oath 11 4ai nst rho 1);,d W (ent,. nr occasional VoleS ‘VitiCh 1-2,j'"-,1" O;tel interfered to prevent. fr V C After a few-words trom Mr. V. Bi•AK was given. d The other Orders of the Day were toc3. posed of, and the Howie ONDON: lted by .1. 13. CRSTAIRS, of • 4.4m0t01-s:rect, Queen-No:ire; aoft potyliF.!tri 'SLAM'S, of No. 7; Son:h INloltoti-street, 114;:u.,e., No. 112. strand ; w'acre•Aiirettiseo ervi, L'ettc:; i t (post-paid) rsaust 'ue \\l l t