The Sun. — London, England, 1819-06-30 00:00:00

(0 141 ~'~;e :i~l; ll'l% \V4IOI/11( ~s 1 1 4: • v. 44, •••• \., , ,rte . l4 4 , joe •• sN„, . 1,- ; e' 7 e ),r•""f. a , Oft ,1 , ..t. ioor i Y ") roil' i•~ i~L" V . V . .. 1 , -4 1 % . *it o`.t .7,k; , 0 Ilio n. Ce ut , -7 a Tft ~' , XO Ol 5 3 ‘ 11.°11 di!' 16C°. •e ). ; 0 1 1' p • .10 Jel" NUMBER 83771 „ . LA4T WEE& ROYAL ACADEMY, SOMERSET-PLACE. NOTICE is hereby given, that the 1 7 ,3,CH1131- r _ TioN of the R O YAL ACADEMY will finally CLoSE b s ATIJIIDAY NEXT, the Sd of July, at SEVEN O'CLOCK ' 44 :BELL Ailcuissioa (every Day from Eight till Soren) One Shilling. Catalogue, One Shilling. HENRY HOWARD, R.A. Secretary. tXtIinITOTIR are requested to send for their Works on uesday the 6tti,or Wednesday the 7th of July. PIC:TU.IM, i WO- FFICE, June 2 9, 191 9- Pry E COMMISSIONERS for VICTUALLING IIisMMMAJEST3'S NAVY do hereby gire Notice, That " Tuesday, the 6th of July next, they will be ;van!, to ;sereive Tend ers i n wr iti n g (sealed up), and treat for Fifty ei NEW BLACK SMYRNA - RAISINS ; to be deliver- I- into Me Itiaje.dy's Victualling Stores at Deptford, one h ay thereof in the space of a fortnight, and the other half in fortnight afterwards; and to be paid for by Bills, pay °lcy without interest, Sixty Days after date. 7-l e. Co n di t i ons o f t h e C on t rac t s may be seen at the Se trr9 14 Office. 4,,,,,0 2- egard will be had to any Tender in which the Price shall :" 6e bise r t e d i n wor d s a t l en gth, or that shrill nut be deli :l7eirt i° the Board before One o'Cloc.4 on the said Tues ,! till: of Juig nest; nor unless the Person who 44 e 1 the Tender, or some Person on his behalf, attends, to i' 74l " w er when called for. - tittrlSH PAINT MANUFACTORY, 62, Queen-Street, Cheapside, fie • per cwt. per gallon. Ad itle A'hite Lead, Turpentine ss. litl ,, e'" Anect qua-]. 465. Linseed Oil t he4s. JJJ 13pp °N and Co. in addressing the Public, most respect tailinfortn them, that their White Lead is of the finest th e e r• 11l this article it may justly be said, "'the best ' is tit, ,;":Pest." The genuine is the most durable as well as the,• - " t • urttatuental • while the inferior kinds, having bad tr e . h r povvers ' reduced, snort become discoloured, and s,,, d ?"(lual to constant exposure to the atmosphere.—Upton tb 41 111, 7. sell White Lead at prioes from 40s t per to v i tgh for the reasons before named, they out tecummend tlc t Qualitv ; these will he found superior to many kinds 't4,lt4s.re offered to the Public as the best, at much higher it; fht u ndermentioned Anti-Corrosive Paints are very neat trn,,l" t4 tance, are very preserving, and are easily applied, r i,ng Only to he thinned wiih Oil ; they are suited fur Clings and all out-door work. ANTI-CORROSIVE PAINTS. In • "sibl • per cwts I 40s. Vi it bpi e dit to 765. 4Cht G reen ' :• 41 t .ties. atri, (lCol u tr 4tis. t an euiate 40s. Refined Coal Tar h 14, 4 . tc •• Merchants and Deale eulours on very ;La% ant per cwt. Bright Red Dark ditto 26s. Black Paint . . 4ss.. Yellow White 44s. Prepared Oil 6d. per gall. town 20s. per cat. .rs supplied with every &scrip tagtous terms. PUBLICATIONS,, This:Day was published, In Octavo, price the. tid. boards, PaETICAL ROMANCE. P u h r By THONIAS COLI,EY RAT;I'AN. L und ' , bed by Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, n, This Day was published, In Duodecimo, price Ins. 6d. in boards, i i " PRACTICE of the COUR r of KING'S REticH in Personal Actions and Ejectment. JOHN FREDERICK ARCHBOLD, Esq. tondos, Of Lincoln's Inn, . Barrister-at-Law. Print e d f or J ose ph B u tt e rw o rth and Son, 43, • .-street And J. Cooke, Ormond Quity, he% This Work itstrongly recommended to the Notice of ii.)j,4etfession, As having very considerably simplified the it treats. p1.., 1 111 E BEAUTIES OF ENGLAND AND WALES. EjIS eleoko t and interesting \York, lately Nun " L co rnpleted in Twenty-five Volumes, comprehending 9 . 41 tur,r most s, form s the complete Library of County I-Its e'.'.°P.,o,tgraphy, and Biography, ever offered to the Public. tN t*,'iu 1) ,„. 11 "liti the publication of " THE BEAU fIES of tit l) and • ‘VALES,'" . At the NuMbers did not appear het, it periodical bucce - ision it is feared there are many tit,:, „:, n the ha n d s o f Subscribers incomplete. The present ;:t.'"^rs, therefore, wt.° have recently purchased the ejeh r re mainin g Stock and Copyright of this valuable Work, te t iCi . e: the earliest opportunity of informi n g the l Subs they shall euntiilue to sell, at the origina price , iNtiinliers or Volumes of the Work may be required *,l l4:j 4 Pkte Sets, till the Ist of January, 10.2.0. It is patti ram, Y te eoinniended to Subscribers not to negbct the pre -4 11,,,ul'Prturiit y o f com pl e ti ng t h e Work ; for, as it is now Ka rr t li kewise rn soparate Counti e s, th e P ro p r i e t or s c ann o t complete any Sets ater that period. l'ill)lished by Sherwoo t d, Neely, and Julies, Pater -1"; alit! G. Cowie and Cu. Poultry. 1 ..„ Tins Day was published, prick 2s. 6d. 11, LACK WOOD'S EDINBURGH 'MAGA • . ZINE, No. XXVII. fur JUNE, 1819. , - 1 g CONTENTS. ._ i 51„,,,. u nle Aciiiint of the Greater History (i. tif St. Alba's. of Matthew Paris, 4,oLtnsisfnd and n Helen, a m o d ern E c l ogue, b y P ercy B yss h e :: 4lla.ssompierre's Entba%sy to England in 169. G. . few Ilionlits on Fly Fishing, suggested by the Re -1.1(%. of Isni,,i,,igv's Complete Angler. t.:l'.. Lit er from Udolaerty, enclosing the Third P a rt o f 41 4 1, 0),L 6. Polito ..7• Note ram Mr Mullion, enclosing an Essay on the State '"l,e Natior' ' " fs. 11 i• '; tte. .wmeli s Mission from Cape Coast Castle to Ashan ,, (Concluded.) 'T' bramatic Scenes, and other Poema, by Barry Cornwall. ;n. Notice s of the Acted Dia lIIR in London. No. X. I: Night : a P-rni.—l2. Song. -13. Sonnet. Ls 1. fle e Fall' sermon of Sadi, translated from the Persian t 'l,:s Ross, E.s. of the Bengal Isiedical Establishrnen . l ' i., i r tl eci of an Old Indian ()Meer. No. 111. h. ,„"'•,"' Waggoner •. a Poem ; by Mr. Wordsworth. , HOLM Ex p;.,;,.4l.ttiesitUrUS (111 Horror ; or, the Charnel I N ‘ j . '''' it.. , aeNah on the Universe. ..,- - rhiiii St.ri t of the 'Pales of My Landlord. ;'„s: !!nr.rary sod Ncirniific Intelligence. i. tt.rolc.,,iireparing for publication. 9 : ~'""thly Lit of Nevi Publications. I. : 1 ' t}' lieeister, &c. I,l ' '''''d for William Illscl.wood, No. 17, Prinee's•street, nit London; s , ‘t , i,,,,,, .• and 1. Casileli and IV. Davies, Snit • , C....4.04••iii:161101,1. (pliat paAll) &A d . Ile ad 611 4: ist U• • —. A. . . WEDNESDAY, JUNE 30, 1819. PUBLICATIONS. Thii Day was published, In I 2nio. price 4s. boards, the Fifth Edition of ATREATISE on the CULTURE of the APPLE and PEAR, and on the NIANUFACTURE of CIDER and PERRY. With an Appendix. By T. A. KNIGHT, Eaq.F.R.S. and L.S. and President of the Horticultural Society of Londun. Printed for Longman, Hnrst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, London. CAPTAIN ROSS'S VOYAGE. OCTAVO EDITION. This Day was published, A Second Edition, in Two Volumes Octavo, with an'entirely new Map and other New Plates, price 11. ls. boards, A VOYAGE of DISCOVERY, m8(le under the Orders of the Admiralty, in his Majesty's Ships Isabella and Alexander, for the purpose of exploring Baffin's Bay, and inquiring into the Probability of a North-West Passage. By JOHN ROSS, K.S. Captain Royal Nary. Printed fur Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, :sad Brown, London. From the LONDON GAZETTE of June 29. BANKRUPTS. R. P. Jackson, Liverpool, merchant, Ju ly 26, 29, and . Aug. IC), at one, at the George Inn, Liverpool. ' Solicitors; Messrs. Orred and Co. Liverpool ; and Messrs. Lowe and Co. Southampton-buildings, Chancery-lane. J. Dobtll, Cr!snbroolc, Kent, brewer, July 6,7, and Aug. 10, at eltsen, at the George Inn, Cranhrook. Solicitors, Mr. James, Millman-place, Bedford - row; and Mr. Kincaid, Crdnbrook. T. Pickton, Hammersmith, grocer, July IS, 20, and Aug. 10, at ten, at Guildhall. Solicitors, Messrs. Woodward and Co. Watling-street. W. Hardy, Manchester, drysaltar, July 16, 17, and Aug. 10, at nine, at the Star Inn, Manchester. Solicitors, Mr. Wal ker, Manchester; and Mr. Ellis ; Chancery-lane. A. Allen, Pall-Mist!, calico-furniture-manufacturer, July 6, 51, and Aug. 10, at twelve. at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Cookncy,Casle-street, Holborn. S. W. Woolrith, Stafford, druggist, July 5, at five, 6,4 t ten, at the White Hatt and Star Inn, Uttoxeter, and Ang. 10, at eleven, at the Swan Inn, Stafford. Solicitors, Messrs. Warner and Cu. Uttoxeter ; and Mr. Knowles, New Inn. It. Eddleston and E. Eddleston, Blackburn, cotton-mann . facturers, Jnly 16, 17, at six, and Aug. 10, at eleven, at the Mitre Inn, Fishergate, Preston. Solicitors, Messrs. Arison and Co. Castle-street, Holborn; Mr. Ainsworth, • Black burn ; and Mr. Illackhurst, Preston. I{. Lanham, Dorking, Surrey, grocer, July C, 10, and Aug: 10, at ten, at Guildhall, Solicitors, Messrs. Russell and Co. Last-street, Bqough. C. lisw, Minoreis, victualler, July S. 10, and Aug. 10, st twelve, at Guildhall. Solicitors, Messrs. Thompson and Co. Leman-street, Goodma!i's-fielda. • DIVIDENDS. July 99, W. Harvey, Warrington, four-dealer—July 22, T. Hied, Bishopwearmouth,. ship-owner--July 520, J. Bul locke, Catherine-street, button-seller--July 21, C. Smith, Bristol, boot-maker—July 24, T. Weaver, High Holborn, floor-cloth-nianufacturer—July 13, J. Nosed, and J. Burch, Jewry-street, wholesale stationers-31d) - 24, W. Savage, Cor poration-row, watch-maker—July 24. M. Ohren and M. C. Ohren, Broad-street, Ratcliffe, t.itioliers—July 94, J. O. Mosley and H.. 1. Keach, Sitinioutlt-place, manufacturers of ornamental toys—July 94, W. Aldhant, Borotigh-hills Mill, Great. Totham, miller—July '22 it. Swani ., Gainshorough, merchant—July 20, C. Carr, Bridge-treet, jeweller—July 21, J. Millar, Liverpool, merchant—July 20, J. Peel, C. Harding, and W. Willock, Fazeley, manufacturers of cutto,,. CERTIFiCATES—Jut.v 20'. J. Lomas, Fetter-lane, tavern-keeper—E. Kelly . , Black Lion-lane, Paddington, builder—J. Barnes, Port,ca, H. Daniel, Warren-street, coach-maker—L. U. Standish, Bishopsgate-street Without, straw-hat manufacturer--R. Blachford„ Little Tower-hill, Stationer —q. Pralie, juin. and J. Bothwell, Ilailiwe.ll, calizo-printers—W. 3opson and C. Wignall, Liverpool, turpentine-distillers—H. ',Nlunio, Upper Thames-street, Peake, Pendletun, wine mei - - ehant—J. Bates, Leybourn, miller. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Jumz 29. HER ROYAL HIGHNESS THE PRINCESS OF WALES y. THE EARL OF LIVERPOOL AND COUNT MUNSTER._. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL moved, that the Bill 1 which had been tiled by the plaintiff in this case, might be dismissed, with costs to be taxed by the Master. This was a bill filed by her RoyelHi4h ness the Princess of Vales, in which it was stated, that the late Duke of Brun,wick had signed, and delivered to her Royal Highness, a promissory note, dated August 24, 1814, for the re-payment of a large sum of money in 1816, together with in terest thereupon, and that his Grace had also sign ed, and delivered to her, another promissory note, bearing date also August 24, 1814, assioing to her the sum of 15,000 French kills, at 24 French livrrs each. The Duke of Brunswick- had since died, and the present noble defendants were named ex ecutors under the will, It would be recollected that more than a twelvemonth ago, a 11106011 had been made to the Court, on behalf of the defend ants, for an order of Court calling upon the Royal plaintiff to produce a certain instrument before the answer was put in. On that occasion Count Mun ster had made an affidavit, stating that he had observed certain peculiarities in the instruments he had seen 5 and particularly in that written in the Fre•nch language, and that be had remarked that the signature of the Duke of Brunswick was not written as his Grace had been accustomed to sign his name. It was therefore prayed, that the answer should not Le put in until a particular in strument should be produced. An order of Court was then given to the effect required ; but not withs.andini; that order, the plaintiff bad tit vtr produced the instrument, and the defendants had been unable ti) put in any answer, and which was, perhaps, a mote impor•ant considetation, had been unable to administer A farthing of the kinds in their hands: the Court would, therefore, see what a predicament the dciendants were placed in. Since the original motion for the productioo of the instrument was made, and Ote nid:r given, tour terms had elapsed, and no reason had been assigned by the plaintiff wily it had not been 1:01/1 plied with. Unless some steps were taken by the Court, the defendants might continue in th is situ ation tor ten years to come, and the case world remain under litigation. Under ail these cit CUM stances, he moved that the bill so filed should be dismissed with costs. Sir A. PIGGOTT and Mr. HEALD followed on the same side. Mr. MARTIN appeared AS Counsel on behalf of her Royal Highness. 'He conceived that this matter lay in a very narrow compass, and that a question of practice merely was to be decided.— Whatever might be the amount of the demand, that consideration, he was convinced, would have but very little weight With the Court. With re spect to the order which had been made for the production of the instrument, he thought that, at least, it %%ionid be admilted that it was novel in its nature ; but it was at the some time one which, of course, all persons were bound to obey. IVtiat, however, he wished to impress upon the Learned Gentlemen on the other side - was, that this ordet was in no manner mandatory upon her Royal High ness to produce the instrument, and therefore there bad not in fact - been - any disobedience:on the Inuit of the Royal plaintiff. The terms of that order were, that the defendants should have a fortnight " sfter the production of the instrument," to put in their answer ; but there was not the slightest compulsion upon her Royal Highness to produce it. Without going into the question, he should therefore content himself with maintain ing, that this was a mere matter of practice, and as such that the Bill ought not to be dismissed, If the object of the defendants had been to get rid of this Bill, they had taken an erroneous course, and it Was evident that no order for a dismissal could be made upon the present motion. The step which should have been taken by the de fendants to gain their object, ought to haie been to have obtained an order, declaring that Within a given time the instrument Should be produced, or that the Bill should be dismissed. This course, however, had not been pursued; and he there fore submitted with confidence, looking upon the former order, and observing that the plaintiff had been guilty of no disobedience, that this applica tion ought to be refused. . . Mr. SHADiVELL followed on the same.side„ and contended that it any delay hall,talkeo place the defendants alone were to. lifaine;:froe if - they thought fit to complain, they might to have put in their ansWer, end ' then riodelay,could have taken place. Itwould certainly . he::a new teatit're.in the practice of the Court tet make the' order at played' tur.. . - - • • The•SnLICITOtt-GaN,l3RAtlimPired,- .o.le .order, although perhaps it might have:been rather novel in its battik, was deciaed upon . 8 principle, the justness It which would not tor a moment be . disputed. : The LORD CHANCELLoR.—This motion arose out of a h ll filed by her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales, in which she stated herself to he a erethtur to her late brother the Duke of Brunswick, and prayed payment at certain sums of money upon two Promissoi y Notes. Count Monster had made an affidavit bringing it into question whether this was a red debt, and bete his Lordship begged to observe, that this might he the ca , e, without in the least prejndicing her Royal Highness. In one sense, perhaps, the order then made by the Court might be consi dered novel ; butt there was no duty more sacred or more incumbent upon Learned Judges to per ' form, than that of looking upon ail suitors in Courts of Lan , or Equity, whatever might be their rank or station in lite, in the light of subjects only, to whom equal jusice might to be distributed. He was very ready to allow that it was not usual for the defendant to call for the production of papers by the plaintiff . ; but he had taken the trouble to look to the principal text writers upon the subject, and had found that where the defendant was will ing to pledge himself upon oath, and stated rea sons entficiently weighty to satisfy the minds of the Court, there was then a justification for the order. At the time when the order was made, he had folly explained the reasons by which he was actuated in so doing. With respect to the present m otion, he could not at this moment say what was the practice of the Court, as it was the consequence of this novel order. He should, ' therefore, be induced rattier to decide this gaes tion principle than upon precedent. What, then, was the principle to he followed in this case ? 'ri te rale of the Court constantly was, if a plaintiff did not, after the mill filed, take any step within three term*, that, atter having been called upon by the defendant's answer, the Bill should he dis missed. It was true, that iu the present instance there had been no answer put in, but he thought that fact made no material difference wader the peculiar circumstances of this case. But it was a matter of possibility, that as the regular prac tice could not be ascertained sonic mistake might arise in making an order for an immediate dis missal of the Bill. With this impression, he should direct that the ius:rument in question be produced on or before the thiid seal. or the bill dismissed, with liberty to the plaintiff either on the first or second seal to snake application upon affidavit for further time. This was the order which be thought at the present moment wou ld b e t h e „ to ," , dv i s . abl e un d e r the peculiar circumstances, but he [PRICE SEVENPENCE. should defer his_ final .decision until to-morrow morning. If, however, nothing more was said respeoting the case, it might be concluded that be intended to make no alteration in this decision. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE 99. CRIMINAL INFORMATION. Mr. F. C. ‘lllit.t.tAms moved for a. Rule to shut cause ki . by a Chinni,' Information should not be filed against is Gentleman', named Campbell, for toiog language towards a Gentleman, named Nicholas Harris, tending to incite him to fight a duel —The affida , its on which the motion was made stated, that both parties were Officers in the Navy, residing at East-Lou, in the county of Cornwall, and Mr. Harris having occasion to ap ply to the Mayor of that Borough, to complain of certain harbour dues demanded in the port of East-Loo, he was met the next day by Mt. Campbell, who a , fdressed him in vet y offensive language, and called him an insignificant puppy, and used other gross epithets, which the Learned Counsel did not think it right to mention. The Court, under the circomstancei mentioned, granted a Rule to bliew cause. MR. LOBBETT'S ARRIVAL IN ENGLAND. WRIGHT V. DOLBY. Mr. CHITTY moved for a rule to she.v cause why the trial of this cause, %shich is an action for a libel published against the plaintiff in Cobbett's Two-penny Weekly Rvgihter, should not be post.; potted until the Sittings huts next Michetelmas Tuns, on the affidavit of Mr. William Cohbett, jun. of the absence of a material and necessary witness, namely Mr. William Cubbett, stn. now residing in America, who was expected to :strive in England towards the fall of the present year, as the deponent verily bt.lit.ved from a lette - r re cently received from his father. The COURT gr apt ed a rule to shew cause. This Day was publisheJ, In 4to. price 11. 11s. 6d. in boards, with a Portrait engraved by Fittler, the TIFE OF WILLIAM, LORD RUSSELL, I With some Account of the Times in which he lived. By LORD JOHN RUSSELL. Printed for Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, and J. Ridgway, London. Also just published, some Account of the Life of Lady Russell, by the Editor of Mad. du Defraud's Letters, with Letters front Lady Russell to her Husband, Lord Russell; some Miscellaneous Letters to and from Lady Russell, &c. &c. Published from the originals in the Possession of the Duke of Devonshire. In 4to. price 11. 7s. hoards. NORRIS V. NUNT. Mr, SCAHMT spewed cause against the Rule obtained by the defendant, for referring the bill of costs in this cause back to the Master to review his taxation. It will be recollected this was an oc tion by the Iligh Bailiff of Westminster, to re-- cover from the defendant contribution towards. the expence of erecting hustings, Rod paying poll clerks, as a Candidate at the last General Election for Westm:nster. defendant had taken five objections to the Mast er's taxation ; Ist, '1 hat he had allowed the expence of two writs, one served in Hampshire, and the other at the defendant's lodgings in Norfolk -street, in the Strand; 2dly, That he had improperly allowed the charge for the notice of the declination which had been served in town ; 3dly, That he hail allowed forty folios for the declaration, there being in fact only thirty. fire ; 4thly, That he hod allowed eight guineas for the talesman who 'seried on the Jury, there being only four-special Jurymen attending; and sthly, That he lied allowed certain fees paid to three of the plaintiff's Counsel. The defendant appeared in person to support his Rule, and after a lung discussion' on both sides, The CoURT were of opinion that the Master's taxation was quite correct, with the exception of the AnOvVRIICe of 40 folios for the declaration, and on that ground they made the Rule abaolate, Attorney paying the costs of the app. cation. HAMILToN V. WILLIAMS AND LEWIS. Mr. ANDREA'S obtained a rule to chew cause why Mr. Lawrence Williams and Mr. Lewis, two Attorniei of this Court, should not be siruck off ihe roll. It appeared by the Report of the 1118i ter, that Mrs. Hamilton had employed Mr. WA. liamt to bring six actions against the proprietors of certain newspapers for a libel ; but that he had brought 15 actions without her knowledge, and had received money which he had not brought into account with her. After some of the ac' ions we e brought he became bankrupt, and then sili ployed Lewis, without the authority or know. ledge of Mrs. Hamilton.—The Court granted the rule as to both, ?NR RING V. WARDLE; This was an information filed by the Solicitor General against the defendant, for pnblisning att alleged libel in The Manchester Observer, of which he was the printer and proprietor. Notice of trial by a Special Jury had been given by the So• licitor for the Treasury, for the nest Lancashire Assizes, and the Jury pAnnel bad been struck yes. terday, Mr. CHITTY now moved for a rule to shew cause wf.y the Jury nominated by the Master .1 1 ould not be set aside, and why the Sheriff , f Lancashire should not be ordered to attend the Master with the freeholders book of the county palatine for the current year, in order that the Master might proceed to the nomination of a► tresh Jury, on au affidavit male by Mr. Charles Pearson, of St. Helen's-pl.ice, that the Special Jury panne{ had been struck from the freeholders' book of ISIS, contrary to the provisions of 3 Geo. 11. c. '25, which requires the Sheriff an• nually to make omit a list of the persons competent to serve on Special Juries, it being contended that the Jury in question should have been struck frotu the list of the current yet, in pursuance of the said Statute. The CouRT granted a Rifle to spew cause tom morrow, a nd directed that the Rule should be serv,d ou the Uuder-Sherd And the Solicitor fus the Treasury. Sir SAMURL SIirPHERD took his set a 5 Chief the Court of Exchequer, Ediuhaigh, Thdrstiay. r goer )lictl+ 'tion s 10' 1 ' et f f e% ' so t, ,Fill' :70 ° ‘ Ire' von' a tcf)' cl his e lou co"" I,t'J► liivi ' !‘" 3 L or 3 ' II ~tA :11 41 lot ' 10' W 0 ,41/ , WO' ~~✓Ci ~'~ Or ,10 4 or e 4 , Q. . 1)11 te v • r 4 it' gstt l e'y 000 04 0 ' gr i " 010 1 ' Avg"' ) be )0 Of (1 to 3 1 ' ' LI °I