The Sun. — London, England, 1841-11-06 00:00:00

I ---- e--te, / e -1(-- - ter-rz--- - ,___.e..e__.-e -/-r--2:--e"e-----/ir—' i - . . ---,------------" ____ .. --- - .6. , ".1111111111116- , ...Arock • " 2 .„ 6 ,-,-..., (e..elt,' . 4.• `4, 0 : 4 7 ;) A.. 4 tr: , 1 / 4 , .......,,, ~,,,.,:. \ . .-,...., ~, ..-i, .. _ ~......,, ~. O. ILI • z,. , --_, ) *N * tP --- r - , "," , . ...,, , -1 -, '' ;--...-....., . ---. \ , ----, , ,y , ... r. ~,,; -, ,, , 5..., ' /. ( 71 1 ~r--e•‘ -; j[10..., , _‘ . .- , ,-.., -... , , . 0, _, • - A .., ////fi ii .. ) 1r , , N ........................... ‘ :," *.., -,, -' 1 , , 1 , ..-"T".' \. .. s . N' '' • 4: E:' 1 . 4 , 151111= '; tillr14116„ - _ — klip k g <° ' - ----, .., ..:....,,,,,..,, e',.. ,p -,..... ,' r -40, ,11,11. V 4,,,;i‘ : •• .- •1" i so. .. , -.AL ... ~, ,A. s _., ~... , •- .i.„,/ , i -1- .. 1 16.. ~ ) .- - ..,..1,...u„-...,...,. ~,,,,,,.., f,. -- -r.., .\ , • . I Z.Z. , • .3- _A 0.! ...: ID, -.'''' " • -"l t;its ' k pit ' ' - 4-- - ••••:. " 0/ )" n mr , 1' 4." ,z - •"•• •"• • • ' ... . . .. ~., NEMllrimmimmer MORNING SUN. I V MORNING SUN. 1 ROYAL POLYTECHNIC INSTITU EVENINGS except SATURDAY EVENINGS. ~iIARTISTS, ENGINEERS, and INVENTORS of me rit Pin futur e h ave t h e i r W or k s Illustrated and Described in tation, w ith t h e v i ew of further promot i ng an d secur ing the b is lic att en ti on to their deserts, and of i ncreas i ng th e variety L E Popular Le c t ures . Th e subject of one of the NEW, r CT URES is Prof essor CLARK'S PATENT PROCESS ,g,PURIFYING the WATERS SUPPLIED to the ME - Te r , P° LIS. The DISSOLVING VIEWS, with Additions. T ' " IS SOLVING ORRERY,MICROSCOPE, and nearly na Thsuiand Works of eminent Art, Science, and Ingenuity. T h e Die i n g t or , Bell a n d Di ver .• A VIEW of CANTON, s'"Y finished by a CHINESE ARTIST. and other COS ., OR AMIC VIEWS, are added to the Evening Exhibitio n. r , Admission to the whole, Otte Shilling. HaIE f e la in st g. Ten o'clock in the Morning, and Seven d fs, I 'l' V it-Ch h u. llor k x,.:,, fe(Hd THE COURT OF DIRECTORS OF THE NEW ZEALAND COMPANY do hereby give Notice, that a SPECIAL COURT of PROPRIETORS of the said COMPANY will be holden on TUESDAY, the 16th day of November next, at One o'clock in the Afternoon, at the Company's House, in Broad-street-buildings, London, for the purpose of Considering a Recommendation of the Court of Di rectors, to DECLARE a DIVIDEND upon the Company's Original Stock.—Dated the 30th October, 1841. By order of the Court, JOHN WARD, Secretary. LAW INTELLIGENCE J RONTERRE O'BRIEN.] SUFFER is PATRIOT of the PRESS, who has lately AION TT ,ED an IMPRISONMENT of EIGHTEEN CA t fiS in LANCASTER CASTLE, for his ADVO- Y el the RIGHTS of WORKING MEN, will make his r at ,ST APPEARANCE (since his release) in LONDON, N. t ne CROWN and ANCHOR TAVERN, on MONDAY Tr, November Bth, at Seven o'Clock in the Evening, when To I, O RAND PUBLIC MEETING WILL BE H ELD, t h e e ar an ADDRESS from the " Schoolmaster of the Age , " tes s e P r esent Appalli ng Condition of the Country, as wit- Dri„ bl him in a Tour which he has just made through the f oali ti , - " e1 'Counties ; and showing the Trades of London the Mahon be taken to render their Unions more effectual, and the ',Ttimore prosperous and happ3. • im4timission to the body of the Room, 2d. ; Tickets for the 'atforr o , 6 d. A WORKING MAN IN THE CHAIR. • rRA.VESEND AND BLACKWALL wi e jast Iron Steam-boats the RAILWAY," " BRUNS- Th e ' and "BLACKWALL." " SIN ) Public are respectfully informed that on and afte r 1 /04.4 Y .NEXT, November 7, 1841, ONE ONLY of these und, will run during the Winter Months, leaving at th e Mentioned times : ,even BLACKWALL. yen A.M. f -past Pour P.M. au;ens .131ackwall Railway P bet a Ir i'm Half-past Eight re 0 , Ni ne at night. :•-:-Ileass 60, Fenchurch-streo FROM GRAVESEND, Eight A.M. Half-past One P. M. rains will run every fifteen mi in the morning, till a Quarter 1, Nov. 5, 1841 t i APIER MACHE TEA TRAYS, 50s. the , SET, (Tab FULL-SIZED GOTHIC SHAPE. Supe tloze_L-ondon le Knives, with ivory handles, 14s. per 1 9 4 . ; Brass Poles for Window Curtains, 11 inch diameter, I per foot ; 2 inches, ls. Bd. per foot ; bronzed fenders, SUPERIOR h, r , g, 9s. 11,i j iv ij ,,, P E,RIOR LONDON TABLE CUTLERY WAR- De —4. L I3 .—TABLE KNIVES, with Ivory Handles, 14s. :b ie d °Z 3 . ; Dessert Knives, Ils. ; Carvers, 4s. 6d. per pair; 111)4sert, nhisv.es&l.w:th white bone handles, es. Bd. per dozen , Carvers, 3s. per pair ; Globe- shape Tea t:l'a,, 4 quarts, 27 5 . ; new shapes, 395. ; Papier Mache Tea e4tstss,, gothic shape, bOs ; the set o f full sizes. Catalogues, A t i7,Pirig the prices, with Engravings of every Ironmongery Per' neo?essary to the furnishing of a house of any size, tia gr at ''t• under any other old-established house, to be hal Ripest free 'ON and BURTON, 12, Wells-street, Oxford-street. Established 1820. COUGHS , SHORTNESS OF 8 4A , UREATH, ASTHMAS, &c.—POWELL'S BAL PA( a of ANISEED, under the immediate patronage of eve -4,1;4 the most distinguished Nobility and Gentry in the Rtes,t 4° P , in bottles, at Is. lid. and 2s. 3d. each.—The tlit o „.Pne this celebrated Medicine has so justly acquired A ti c i nZut the world, in immediately relieving Coughs, Colds, " se ve r ' &'c•, and which is fully confirmed by the testimony 4 40 al of th e most em i nent mem b ers o f th e m edical pro .lloc.}l,',,riiot with great lib er ality, recommend it as a Family Ariei4"ledicine, renders any eulogium on the part of the Pro- I ttteci: nu eoessary. The following extraordinary case is in - IPasticular request : with Wright of Mile-end-road, was many years afflicted ever OA, shortness of breath, and sense of suffocation, when %lave attempted to lie down in bed, owing to the great accu he4ri of viscidphlegm which he was unable to expectorate. bee tried • o t o t every means to obtain relief, but without effect; Otin e u ,g e no sleep but in his arm-chair. In this state he eip eeti u to linger, without any hope of recovery, his friends in,er ke. ri g that every fit of coughing would terminate his ex- f 110 At length he was prevailed upon to try a bottle o first dlaul, and (very extraordinary !) half au hour after the gad ta re he wa s able to lie down in his bed; and, before he P re 'en three bottles, was perfectly cured. 4174 Pared and Sold by Thomas Powell, Blackfriars-road, D 'et; ll t ' °l d (by appointment) by Sanger, No. 150, Oxford liod rt„, 4 ,°,d by most of the respectable Chemists and Wholesale 'NO" Patent Medicine Venders in the United Kingdom. (1/0 s" ,9. IIT ANT CAUTlON.—Observe that the words r IAB POWELL, Blackfriars-road, London," are (by I L 4 veri" in of her Majesty's Commissioners of Stamps) en wh it letters upon a red ground, in the Governm ent tAinio7bliexited over the top of each bottle, without which it genuine. J ost l'41'11:he(-----cir.143 -- Seventh Edition, price_ 3s. ; and sent free, it ar. A receipt of a Post-office order, for 3s. 6 . d., i l -V-V E4 HOOD ; the CAUSES of its PRE :,'!'t. PEIIII,I',URE DECLINE, with plain Directions for egevin t ,e - ,.' , 1.CT RESTORATION; addressed t w'olit th e l 'ti Hi the destructive effects of Excessive Indu . o lgence, s Treat s ° ,l l, or Infection • followed by Observations on .t ated teut . • • 60norrhcea, Gleet, &c., illus coil isi th _ ei Syphilis, %hi nt re st g te. By Neons, London. J. L. CURTIS and COMPANY, „ Published SE VEN al EDITION. 4 %ksell ee , b3 ' the Authors, and sold by Balliere, ,)9 Medical s treet ; ' 6 the Royal College of Surgeons, - , ...Re . g . e cf n es t : str eet ~t r0,,,,_ SI - ge 21 t ; Pattie, 4, Brid„ , An a ' s. ' -rand, London;. Guest, Birmingham Sowler, 4 ? St. 114° I; p ti t 4te s Ilanchestr ; Philip, South Castle-street, Liver -114, cachen arid Co., 8, D'Oher.street, Dublin; Duncan, s The foil t, Ediburgh • and to be had of all . Boo . kseller NH ; tils e .°ll° wing ' are a few of the numerous testimonials this "IN - work has received, and which the limits of an adver :tt.riiawrtisll, o w n a l s y allow of being published : 7 . . t ild th e e ra ge for books in all departments of Science, literature, we believe, never so prevale f n t as at 'ltset nn e• The unavoidable consequenceindifferent, t his is t hatwe o usele,s, and tV eti t k v d er l y lo censidera!ale proportion the f r o u r o c n e of this prejudice on our 112 % 1 ' i : 1d % We With w o it k h s 'noli . .tle reluctance were induced to peruse 44• Curtis's work, entitled "Manhood ;" nor did it re •, sti e touch perusal fully tosatisfy us that the book was not ki l et the common stamp. The scientific views taken by the tiOs of the source and origin . of many of the most distressing th e - i t s t. of certain depraved habits, fully d. establish their claim to udicious surgeons. To tplot e w statter of experienced an proof of our assertion would " dis a l t ssages from the work inn t estdrstirig from the established P ru r les of the daily press. The t° iruV°Wever, of our careful perusal of the work, has been skill ii.es,s us with a thorough . confidence in the talent and Los ° „:„`oe authors, and to satisfy us that those entrusted with h lslii" lre of youth are not a little indebted to them for u • 41 1111 them with a means of preventing some of the most Letziy: maladies to which flesh is heir.—Old England. the f en ;' %;urtis's work , entitled "Manhood," is one of 4h l ay now coming before the public on such . a subject which the J c lwitri to the character of being strictly professional, at l'lse-`rostirne that it is fully intelligible to all who . read it. thi e tooral and medical precepts given in it, render it invalu , li i ss sgriet. skts e ,perusal of Messrs. Curtis's book entitled " Manhood," d rieyet--"iy.astonished us by developing a series of . mal es, the treats ikuing consequence of the vicious habit of a Which it . ea lls : The clear connexion pointed out between the assigned %tr ail ; 1 4 2 1 1 the e ff ects i s percept ibl e to every capac i ty . We Th e y reCOMMend the work.—Age. Way ra Xultitude of books daily coming from the press, some, trvir4st of them of a very questionable tendency, made us h ex • 4, 4 y reluctant to take up another. Having, however,. been hi e a r by the character given of this work by an intelligent t i lWe ventured toopen its pages, and now . feel no hesita • A lit 4 d 4 /ing that we arise from its perusal instructed and mtse t , e she clear exposition of the source of many of those doi a i i - Z Which proves so fatal to youth, and which are set 4 4.1 4e3 "3' the every-day observer as the result of common Nu r .' ',lt'll as exposure to cold, sudden vicissitudes of tempe sett, ly' s .' t it ; oreditary taint, &c., is truly convincing and extre urt's-I,4tory- We say " satisfactory," inasmuch as Messrs. z o u itte l l ut t ; a tion, sh E o p w il n eps t y h , at &e m „ any diseases, such as . Pulmonary hitherto the opprob . ria of meth eieustq, when taken in proper time, and submitted to ju.di sa ,„ rea.trnent, be broght tas avourable a termination f s . i . C il Y other class of affec u tions. o We f do not think we go too Prod,:flYing that society is deeply indebted to the authors for a4 orsil a n ts° useul, so much wanted, so valuable, and so truly Ve (.-- Conservative Journal. estefeare°l7emend the work entitled " Aranhood," &c., well i h a e s t h Ysi r e .., ruga l of persons of all classes. The moral as w -•05t ea ,...,_,".. vantages sure to result from such perusal, will b . e need nr"„tlY recognised and felt by those who stand most in hi , :e." [tero . -- -Statesma n . thei e - s• CUrtis and Company are to be consulted daily at co eidence, No. 7, Frith -street, Soho-square, London.. 14 tl i nn.t rY Patients are requested to be as minute as possible p l aint, detail of their cases .—As to the duration of the cons ktio ' the smptoms, age, general habits of living, and occu- Onp an n itz i __,he oi the paily (the communication must be_ .ac tto need by the usual consultation fee of 1/., without which, IQ aise _e . '.whatever can be taken of their application ; and in i t he most irrvielable secrecy may be relied on. th ° al , five i a 0 _ 1 , f io . 0 °.- , iS / ' l 4, es , t he tit f A tSJO f gg 10 1 ‘ f of_. o be • for ° ofr ropoi to ted : 1 : 0 1 as t he PLO it o f ou r , es er , to top, to 04 ~~ co . ( 0 f Di' ii o• 40. 5, Of E. ' Oe ° ll PUBLICATIONS. Now ready, post Bro., price Es. cloth, with Maps an d Plates, NEW ZEALAND, SOUTH AUSTRA LIA, and NEW SOUTH WALES: a Record of recant Travels in these Colonies, with especial reference to Emigration, and the advantageous employment of Labour and Capital. By R. G. JAMESON, Esq. " An impartial and trustworthy view of the chief British Colonies of the Southern ilemisphere."—Spectator. London : Smith, E'v'er, and Co., 65, Cornhill. BLACKWOOD'S STANDARD NO VELS. To be Published in Monthly Volumes , Price Six shillings. Juct published, The ANNALS of. the PARISH, and the AYRSHIRE LE GATEES, by JOHN GALT, with a Portrait of the Author, Engraved by Shaw, after Thomson ; and a BiographiCal Me moir by Delta. " Altogether the work is well designed, well got up, and well edited."—Spectator. Printed for William Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh and London ; and sold by all Booksellers. On the 15th of November, in 3 vols. post Bvo., closely and beautifully printed, E N THOUSAND A-YEAR; Carefully revised by the Author. Wro. Blaclivrood and Sons 45, George-street, Edinburgl. 22, Pall Mall, London. Now ready, 99 pp., Is., and may be had of all Booksellers by an early application. THE FARMERS' ALMANAC and CA LENDAR for 1842. By CUTHBERT W. JOHN SON, Esq. (Editor of the Farmers' Encycloptedia), and WILLIAM SHAW, Esq., late Seeretary to the Royal Agri cultural Society of England. _ James Ridgway,Piccadilly ; and to be had in every Market town in the three kingdoms. NEW WORK ON DEBILITY, &c. Just published, price 45.; or sent by Post, free, 55., SELF-PRESERVATION ; a Popular Essay on the Concealed Causes of those obscure and neglected Disorders of the Generative System, originating in certain solitary habits, youthful excesses, or infection, and terminating in Nervous Debility, Local or Constitutional Weakness, Gonorr hoea, Syphilis, Indigestion, Insanity, and Consumption. With Practical Observations on MARRIAGE, and on the Ana tomy, Physiology, and Diseases of the Reproductive Organs, with plain directions for their perfect Restoration. By SAMUEL LA'MERT, CONSULTING SURGEON, 21, FALKNER-STREET, MANCHESTER, Matriculated Member of the University of Edinburgh, Hono rary Membel• of the London Hospital Medical Society, Li centiate of Apothecaries' Hall, London, &c. &c. Published by the Author, and sold in London by S. Gilbert, 26, Paternoster-row ; Courier Office, 4, St. Ann's-square, and Lewis, Market-street, Manchester; Newton, Bookseller, Church-street, Liverpool ; Watts, Snow-hill, Birmingham ; Cornish. 159, Briggate Leeds; Fryer, New Bond - street , Bath ; Healey, Cheltenham ; Independent Office, Cambridge; and by all Booksellers. The various positions of Lover, Husband, and Parent, which the world are severally anxious to fulfil, are the inherent privi leges of mankind, and but for the accidents of mortality would be awarded equally to all. To such, among others, this essay addresses itself; and, by its perusal, many questions may be satisfactorily adjusted, that admit of no appeal, even to the most confidential friend. To fan the spark of hope, to dissi pate groundless alarm, to restore failing confidence, and point to the means of securing a happy old age, is no trifling n.com mendation of an effort directly tending to the social and moral welfare of all classes of the community. Mr. La'Mert is to be consulted daily, at his residence, and Country Patients are requested, in their letters, to be as mi nute as possible in the detail of their symptoms, age, general habits of living, and occupation in life. The communication must be accompanied by the usual Consultation Fee of 1/.. without which no notice whatever can be taken of their appli cation; and in all cases the most inviolable secrecy may be re lied on. 21, Falkner -street, Manchester. MARRIAGE. New and Enlarged Edition (in an Envelope), price 55., by post 6s. 6d., MARRIAGE —Its Intent, Obligations, and Physical and Constitutional Disqualifications, Medically considered; with Essays on Hereditary Health, and on many of the Caicealed Infirmities of Human Life. To which is added, the Confessional—comprising. details of Melancholy, Nervousness, and Feeble Health, arising from Care, Grief Anxiety, Dissipation, Gourmandism, Corpulency, Love, and Religion, with numerous Engravings, &c., the entire forming a series of interesting, original, and important Papers, ad di essed especially to those approaching and arriving at Pubert7 and Manhood, and called " PROFESSIONAL RECORDS. By a PHYSICIAN. Sherwood, 23, Paternoster-row; Carvalho•l47, Fleet-street; Smith, 5, Liverpool-street. City ; Hannay, 63, Oxford-street; 39, Cornhill ; and all Booksellers. THE WHOLE CHARTER FOR A HALFPENNY. ASK FOR THE E NG LISH CHARTIST CIRCULAR PRICE ONE HALFPENNY ! " This noble, though humble, ally in the glorious cause of the People is, we are happy to perceive, pursuing its onward march, and, if properly encouraged, cannot fail must efficiently to aid in the cause of right and justice. The number before us (25), besides other highly interesting matter, contains the " People's Charter" entire. Thus every working-man, for the charge of a single halfpenny, can procure for himself and family an authentic copy of this most—this all-important document; and we sincerely trust that the whole of the masses w ill gladly avail themselves of the opportunity, and that all working-men will aid in its circulation."—Northern Star. The Work can be had in Monthly Parts, 6d. each. ' l4 In the current Numbers of this Work, Memoirs of Muir, Emmett, and Lord E. Fitzgerald will be found, with stirring Articles on THE REPEAL OF THE UNION, &c. London : Cleave, Shoe-lane, Fleet-street; and all Booksel lers and Newsmen. PARR'S LIFE PILLS. TO THE PUBLIC. No sooner is a Medicine well established in public favour than a host of imitators arise, who, for the sake of gain, not only wrong the Proprietors of the genuine Medicine, but inflict a serious injury on the unwary purchaser of their base counter feit trash. These observations apply with increasad effect to the Medicine which is now so well known as " PARR'S LIFE PILLS." This famous remedy has been established by undoubted proofs of its efficacy, and by a mass of evidence and testimonials which no other medicine ever yet called forth. These facts have had the effect of producing a very large sale —more than 15,000 boxes per week. When this large sale came to the knowledge of some unprincipled persons, they, for the sake of gain to themselves, and reckless of the injury it may do to• others, attempted to foist on the incautious various imitations, supported by statements which exhibit the most un blushing effrontery. In order that purchasers may be able to de tect these frauds, care must be taken to look at the Government Stamp pasted round each box, and be sure it has the words " Parr's Life Pills," in white letters on a red ground, engraved therein, and forms part of the stamp ; also that the name of " Mr. Edwards, 67, St. Paul's, London," is printed, as W hole sale Agent, on the directions wrapped round each box. Ask for " Parr's Life Pills," and inquire for the little book containing the Life of Old Parr, thirty-two pages, with engrav ings, also the numerous testimonials, which may be had gratis on application of all agents and respectable venders throughout the United Kingdom. As a proof of their efficacy the Proprietors refer to the follow ing Extraordinary Cure of Confirmed Asthma selected from hundreds of a similar nature : Mrs. Joseph Simpson has been severely afflicted, for the iast thirty years, with a violent cough and difficulty of breathing. The affliction has been so severe that she could not fulfil her usual domestic obligations. She took cold when only fifteen years old, and the cough never left her till she took Parr's Life Pills. She had tried almost every kind of medicine, and had taken laudanum in large quantities, but nothing afforded relief. She heard of Parr's Pills about last Christmas, and as soon as she had taken about halt a box she found herself completely cured, and was never afflicted in the slightest manner during the severe weather that followed, and is now better in health than she has ever been in her life. This cure does indeed appear miraculous ; but for the satis faction of the most incredulous, she has kindly consented to an swer any inquiries, either by personal application, or by letter, addressed to Mrs. Joseph Simpson, Church-hill Close, Old Lenton, near Nottingham. The medicine is sold wholesale by appointment of the pro prieters by Edwards, 67, St. Paul's, London, in boxes at Is. lid., L 2s. 9d., and Ifs. each. COURT OF-CHANCERY, .Nov. The LORD CHANCELLOR took bankrupt petitions, lu natic petitions, and appeals to-day. - BOOTH V. CRESWICK. In this case, in which there was a motion and a peti tion, upon the application of Mr. Stuart they were both ordered to come on together. CARTER V. NELSON, A WARD. Mr. DANIEL said he was instructed to apply to his. Lordship in this case for the direction of the Court, in consequence of the circumstances that had taken place.. The petition was presented shortly before the present term by the father of a young lady, complaining that she had been removed to improper custody, and had been improperly detained by the respondent. On . the first day of term , the petition being then on the paper of the Vice-Chancellor of England, the counsel on behalf of the petitioner applied to the Court for the purpose a having a day fixed for the parties to attend his Honour. The Vice-Chancellor having fixed Wednesday morning, the parties attended, and as it was considered a case necessary to be heard in private the matter came on in his Honour's private room. The matter of the petitioner was opened, the affidavit of the father on behalf of the petitioner was opened also, and his Honour questioned the young lady in private. The Court having heard the matter of the petitioner, ordered that it should stand over till Wednesday next, and that in the mean time the custody of the young lady should be retained by the respondent. Subsequently it was ascertained that the petition had been, in fact, transferred to the paper of Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce. Mr. ROUPEL—NO, it had not been transferred ; it was put on Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce's paper by mistake. Mr. DANIEL—It appeared on the paper of Vice-Chan eellor Knight Bruce ; and wa. struck out when called 611. 'no party appeftvin t ;. ['niter these - circumstances it was supposed, on the part of the respondent, that than , might be some difficulty, because it was feared it alight be said that the petition, having been transferred to the paper of Vice-Chancellor Bruce, the Vice-Chancellor of England had no authority to make the order he had done. • Under these circumstances he had been in structed. to 'apply to the Court for its direction. The LORD CHANCELLOR wished to know whether the petition was transferred before the question came on before the Vice-Chancellor of England. Mr. DANIEL said that he had been instructed that such was the fact; it was stated upon affidavit. The Lord CHANCELLOR said he had been told that that was not very probable, because it had been arranged that the Vice-Chancellor of England should take the old petitions, of which this was one. Mr. DANIEL WAS SO instructed. Mr. ROUPEL, on behalf of the petitioner, submitted that the application was not only irregular but unneces sary. It proceeded upon the assumption that the petition had been transferred to the paper of Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce. It was true that the petition had ap peared on the paper of that Learned Judge, but it had been put there by mistake, and upon its being called on it was struck out upon that fact being stated to the Court. Such being the facts, he submitted it bad been properly heard by the Vice-Chancellor of England,' and disposed of by that Learned Judge. The LORD CHANCELLOR said it was clear that it was properly on the paper of the Vice-Chancellor of England, and had been by mistake put into that of Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce. His Lordship thought that if inquiry had been made by the clerk of Mr. Daniel, that mistake might have been discovered. Mr. ROUPEL observed that no party disputed the order of the Vice-Chancellor of England, and he sub mitted, therefore, that he was entitled to the costs of the present application. Mr. DANIEL said, that his client was anxious to ob tain the direction of the Court ; and, under such circum stances, he trusted the Court would not visit him with the costs. The LORD CHANCELLOR, considering that if inquiry had•been made by Mr. Daniel's client, he would have ascertained that the petition had been properly heard by the Vice-Chancellor of England, ordered him to pay the costs of the present application. IN THE MATTER OF BLAKE, A BANKRUPT, This case came before the Court upon appeal from the l odgment of the Court of Review. The only question in the case was whether a creditor who had a debt due from the bankrupts individually, and also a debt due to him from the bankrupt jointly with another person, and who had sued out a fiat of bankruptcy, was entitled to prove and receive dividends out of the separate estate of the bankrupt as well in respect of the joint as the sepa rate debt, or whether the circumstance of the separate debt being sufficient to sustain the fiat precluded the creditor from proving against the separate estate for the joint debt. The Court of Review decided that the creditor was only entitled to prove for the separate debt, and from that decision the party appealed. Mr. SWANSTON and Mr. GIRDLESTONE appeared in support of the appeal, and Mr. BETHELL was Counsel for the party in whose favour the Courrof Review had given judgment. The LORD , CHANCELLOR, at the conclusion of the ar guments, postponed giving judgment. IN THE CASE OF SWINDELL, A LUNATIC. The remainder of the day was occupied in the opening of this lunatic petition, which had not concluded when the Court rose. ROLLS' COURT, Nov, 5. JENKINS V. BRYANT. Mr. PEMBERTON moved on behalf of Mr. Bull a solicitor, to discharge an 'order to him as soli of the plaintiff to deliver his bill, and all the b and papers in the cause, to the plaintiff. It ap peared that the parties had entered into an engagement with the solicitor not to employ any other person in the suit in that capacity ; and his Lordship, after hearing the facts of the case, which related to an annuity, granted the order. SELVES V. SELVES. Mr. PE3II3ERTON, on behalf of the plaintiff, moved to transfer a fund remaining in Court in this cause. A testator by his will, bearing date in the year 1802, directed the income of a sum of 1,7001. to be paid to Edward Selves for his life, and after his death to be transferred to his children, and divided between them share and share alike, as they should respectively attain the age of 25 years. Edward Selves died in 1824, and it was now prayed that the remainder of the fund, which had been reduced to 1,3371. by various decrees of the Court, should be divided, in their respective proportions among such of the children as had attained the age of 25 His LORDSHIP granted the order, which was not op posed. KEMP V. HILL. Mr. PEMBERTON moved for an order to Mr. Rowson, solicitor for the trustees of a gentleman named La Bruyere, to deliver up certain deeds and papers relating to the estate devised by him, which were detained by Mr. Rowson, for a lien which he claimed to have upon them. His LORDSHIP, after hearing the facts in suppport of the petition, suggested that the deeds should be placed in the custody of the Court, and that it should be re ferred to the Master to ascertain whether Mr. Rowson had any and what lien upon them, but that they should not go out of the custody of the Court, without notice to Mr. Rowson ; to which arrangement Mr. Walker as sented, on the part of Mr. Rowson. GURDEN V. BADCOCK. • Mr. PEMBERTON moved for an order that Samuel Deacon, the executor of the receiver in this suit, should within a week pay into Court the several sums of 6431. 18s. 3d. and 3491. Os. 9d., making together the sum of 992/. 195., together with interest on the same, and the costs of the application. The Learned Counsel said Mr. Deacon was the surviving representative of the receiver in the cause, and as such, was ordered many years ago to pay the above sum into Court; which, however, he never did, but had suggested many excuses for not doing so, which had proved to be unfounded. The bill was filed by Benjamin Gurden and Thomas Shillingford, tenants for life of an estate left by a gentle man named Smithers, which he had charged with various payments, among which was an annuity to Mary Saun ders. On the Bth of July, 1806, an order was made to appoint a receiver of the estate, in consequence of which Mr. William Drayson was appointed receiver. Mr. Drayson passed two accounts to the year 1807, and paid the balance into Court, and by a decree made in the cause in February, 1808, he was continued as receiver. Mr. Drayson died in 1809, and appointed his widow and Samuel Deacon to be his executors ; and on the 16th of June, 1812, application was made to the Court on their behalf, praying that they might be at liberty to pay such accounts of the receiver as were not passed, and in pur suance of the orders thereupon made the Master made two reports, by which it was found that the above sum of 992/. 19s. was due from them as the representa tives of the receiver. The Master subsequently made his general report, and thereby found that a considerable sum of money was due to Mary Saunders, and these re ports were confirmed on November 10, 1813. On Sth December the case came on for further directions, and it was then decreed that the rents of the estate were littble to keep down the interest. The suit had been ptose cuted in a negligent manner ; Mrs. Saunders, who: died in 1839, never got anything that was due to her, and upon her death her representatives applied for and obtained the conduct of the suit. Application was subsequently made to Mr. Deacon, for pay ment of the above sums, in answer to which he stated that he had paid it to Mr. Kirby, the solicitor in the cause, and that it was detained by him in part of his account. It was contended that the order of the Court had not been complied with, and it was, therefore, prayed that it might forthwith be carried into effect. Mr. RUSSELL and Mr. Romna.v, on behalf of Mr. Deacon, complained that this proceeding should have been instituted against their client, after so long time had elapsed, especially when it was not denied that he bad not derived any benefit from the estate, and when all the evidence went to show that, though he had not acted in the regular manner, yet he had acted with the consent of all the parties concerned, and that the money had been received by the parties entitled to receive it, though not in the manner decided by the Court. MS LORDSHIP desired defendant's counsel to examine the orders, and said he would hear Mr. Pemberton's re- Ay to-morrow. - - VIOE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Nov. 5. (Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND.) His Honour was occupied the whole day with unop posed petitions, short causes, and cause petitions, none of which possessed the slightest public interest. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. NEWMARKET COURSING MEETlNG—Continued. t es .l, f r o r. r F li .s e o A n, l s lin F g in to e n ss l e l ; ill A S ir t . ak i e n s sicip M s r. l F sa in i e w h a 's t . THURSDAY—(Chippenham Field.) b T ea l Mr. Gillett's Grecian Queen ; Mr. Saberton's Swift beat Mr. Nash's Cinderella. Mr. Edwards' Antoinette ran Gossip beat a bye. First Ties for the Cup—Mr. Dobede's Dunallen bent Mr. Fyson's Fantail ; Mr. Gillett's Ganymede beat Mr. Finch's Gibraltar ; Mr. Nash's Cadiz beat Mr. Fyson's Fury ; Mr. Saberton's Souvenir beat Mr. Vipan's Verbena. First Ties for the Chippenham Stakes—Mr. Inskip's Irishman beat Mr. Edwards' Arctic ; Mr. Gillett's Ge- nuine beat Mr. Moody's Railroad ; Mr. Dobede's Defi ance beat Mr. Vipan's Vulcan ; Mr. Fyson's Fakeaway beat Mr. Finch's Genius. First Ties for the Port Stakes.—Mr. Finch's Ghita beat Mr. Dobede's Dante ; Mr. Dobede's Delia beat Mr. Fyson's Frederica . Mr. Gillett's Gambler beat Mr. Vipan's Violante; Capt. Daintrie's Knab ran a bye. The Rutland Stakes. —Mr. Edward's Arsenic beat Mr. Bryant's Eclipse ; Mr. Dobede's Daedalus boat Mr. Fyson's Fly ; Mr. Nash's Caleb beat Mr. Finch's, Gar cia ; Mr. Dobede's Doug las beat Mr. Batt 's Crucifix ; Mr. Inskip's lanthe beat Mr. Nas h's Cadland ; Mr. wards' Antar beat Mr. Saberton's Sesqui ; Capt. Daintree's Kathleen beat Mr. Saberton's Swallow ; Mr. Fyson's Fairy beat Mr. Gillett's Go-a-head. , THE PEOPLE'S CIIARTER.—( ~OTTespond ent requests us to publish the following.)—At a nu merous and highly respectable meeting of gentlemen held last night, at the King's Arms Tavern, Philip-lanc, et Wood-stre, the following was proposed - as a question for discussion, t. Would the People's Charter, it' passed into a law, be a remedy for the grievances that afflict this country ?" when the affirmative was carried; and it is worthy of remark, as a sign of the progression of right principles, that there was but one hand held up against the question, and the owner of that hand himself declared that on principle he was in favour of the Charter. tiOl'ON r. BRUCE. This is a suit_ instituted b Cliprles :Hopkiii son .and Co., the bankers, oh behalf of themselves and others, the creditorS of the late Mr. John Prosser, the army accoutrement maker, of Charing-cross. Mr. Prosser died insolvent in 1837, and an adminis tration was granted to his daughter, Mrs. Bagster, in March, 1838, and a bill having been filed against her and her husband by the creditors of the deceased; a de -. cree was made, directing the intestate's personal estate generally to be applied to the payment of his debts and funeral expellees ; and, in case the personal estate should be deficient for those purposes, the Master to take' an account of the intestate's personal and real estates, and the rents and profits derived - from them. It appeared that the intestate's property, consisting of the stock-in-trade, the fixtures, and utensils, and the interest in thc.N.leasehold premises, were sold by the ad ministratriX, Mrs. Begster, to her brother Mr. John Prosser, the intestate's son, who had remained in posses sion, and continued to carryon his father's business, for a sum of about 2501., which the plaintiffs considered to be only one=fourth of its value. The decree made it in cumbent on the Master to carry an inquiry as to whether any sales of the property had taken plaoe,and if so whether those sales had realised the utmost value of the pro perty. Thellefendants had taken exceptions to the in terrogatories of the Master, and the present application was to have those exceptions overruled, and to allow that the interrogatories should stand. His HONOUR apprehended that the question to be de cided was whether these interrogatories did not extend to matters upon which it was not incumbent on the Master to report. The power to examine parties was given to the Master for the purpose of obtaining evi dence, in order to enable him to inform the Court upon the matters into which it was incumbent on the Master, acoording to thr de,ree, to inquire. The interrogatories mitst extend r., ,H but would not 4o caritier. (io at the tli4.re,' it ap peared to Ins Honour that the interrogatories did extend • to some matters upon which the Master was not required to report ; and, therefore, the parties objecting had a right to do so. He did not decide that the interrogatory was wrong ; but as it stood, it went beyond the Master's functions ; he did not, however, therefore think it neces sary to send back to the Master to review the report. But he thought it right to allow the excep tions so far as related to the fourth interrogatory. At the same time, he wished it to be understood that it was his opinion that it would be entirely competent for the Master to continue the inquiries into which he had en.ered. The present order of the Court merely allowed the exceptions with regard to the fourth interrogatory. ROBINSON v. ROSRER. This was a suit instituted by a mortgagee of the pre mises No. 27, Field-lane, to recover the amount of rent and dilapidations of those premises from the defendant, as having an equitable interest by assignment of a lease of them to him. It appeared that a sum of 76/. was due to the de fendant by the tenant of the premises. The latter being called on to pay that sum, he promised to pay 20/ in a few months, and at the _ same time gave the defendant the lease of his house as a security for the pay ment of that sum. The defendant kept the lease for some time, when, no money having been paid by the tenant, he returned the lease, and the present suit was instituted. A decision had been made by the Vice- Chancellor of England, in the case of Moor v. Chose, that an equitable interest as assignee in leasehold pre mises made the assignee liable for rent. A subsequent decision in the case of Flight v. Bentley was relied on by the defendants. Ilis lloNoun concurred in the view 9 f the law taken in the decision in Flight v. Bentley, and the ease was dismissed without costs. COURT OF QUEEN'S BE,NCII, Nov. 5. LANE V. DEWsom. This was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant, an auctioneer, for the sum of 411., being the-value of certain trees, purchased by the plaintiff, and which the - defendant refused to deliver up. The case was heard before Mr. Baron Parke at the last as sizes for Lincoln, and a verdict was had for the defendant, with leave to enter a verdict for the plaintiff. Mr. Sergeant LUDLOW now moved for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside. It ap peared that a person named Bankes was - indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of 2001., and on being applied to for payment of the debt, he said he was about to sell a quantity of trees, and that the plaintiff might go and pur chase some to reduce the amount of the debt. The plain tiff accordingly attended to purchase-trees, which he had measured the following day, and ascertained that the value was 411., but the auctioneer refused to allow him to take them away, stating that he had a lieu upon them, and justified his detention by reason of that lien. At the trial a question was raised as to whether the auctioneer really had a lien, but Mr. Baron Parke was inclined to think that he had ; but, even admitting that he had a lien, his Loidship was of opinion that that - should have been specially plead4d,-whielehad not been done. Mr. Justice COLERIDGE—How does the question of lien arise ? Mr. Sergeant LUDLOW—We said it did not arise at all. because it had not been pleaded. • Lord DENMAN—In trover it has been made a ques tion whether denying the property does not set up the lien—that has been held, I think. Mr. Sergeant LUDLOW said there was a case in 6th Meeson and Welsby in which that point was considered, and where it was laid down, that where the property was dekined, the matter mu s t b e se t out in the record— if a OW has a lawful exc use f or detaining it, he must plead The COURT thought the question required some con , sideration before the rule was granted. JONES V. THE LL.A,NELLY RAILWAY COMPANY. Mr. CHILTON moved in this case for a rule to show cause why the verdict for the plaintiff, with damages 501., should not be increased to a verdict for 2001. damages. It was an action of debt, and upon an award. The defendants pleaded the performance of a part of the award, and the impossibility of performing the remain der. It appeared that the plaintiff, Harry Jones, was a piece of land, through which it was pro possessed of posed the Llanelly Railway should pass ; and when the parties went before the Court of Quarter Sessions in order to have the case submitted to a Jury, it was agreed that the case should be referred to a Magistrate of a county ; and, by the rule of reference, the amount of compensation and damage, as well direct as consequen tial, which would be occasioned to the land, was referred to the arbitrator. There was an exception with regard to inundations, upon which, however, nothing would turn. The arbitrator awarded 7301. as full compensation for the land, and also a further sum of 2001. conditionally. He directed that there should be four arched tunnels made at various parts of the line, by which severance of the property would be avoided, and which, when com pleted, would enable the defendants to avoid the pay ment of the 2001. It appeared that the Company made three tunnels, but did not snake the fourth ; and the pro vision in the award was, that these four tunnels should be made within three months, and in the event of their not being then completed, the Company were ordered and directed to pay, within ten days from the expiration of the three months, the sum of 2001. to the plaintiff. Lord DENMAN—I never heard of an arbitrator award ing a penalty under such circumstances. Mr. CHILTON contended that the Company not having fulfilled the conditions of the award, and not having given any satisfactory reason why they had not made the fourth tunnel, the plaintiff was entitled to the damages conditionally awarded him. • The Court granted the rule. CRIMINAL INFORMATION—THE QUEEN P. A. COLLIN RIDGE. Mr. JERVIS had been instructed on behalf of Lieut.- Colonel Williamson, of the Royal Engineers to apply to the Court for a rule to show cause-why a criminal infor mation should not be against the defendant, Augustus Collinridge, Editor of the Southern Adver tiser newspaper. The grounds of the .application were that Mr. Collinridge had sent a challenge to Colonel Williams, and had charged him with cowardice in not fighting him. The affidavit of Colonel Williams set out that he had been fur thirty years in the Royal En gineers, and having retired from that corps in 1837 on full pay, he took up his residence at Hastings. Some time since, it being in the contemplation of that town and St. Leonard's to erect a steam-boat pier, it was thought, in consequence of Colonel Williams' former habits and occupations, that he would be an eligible person to con sult, and he was requested to prepare plans, which he accordingly did, and the inhabitants passed a vote of thankS to him, and presented him with a piece of plate for his services. In consequence, however, of the parties interested in the matter being unable to raise the necessary funds the project of the p ier was for the time abandoned. Col. Williams, like eve r y other g ent lemen , as he had. the right, entertained p olitical o p inio ns , and was pre sent at a dinner given to his (Mr. J ervis's) friend, Mr. Holland, theAtlteaemkbr upon f Williams, by the defend ant, Mr. Collinridge , a nd the first shot fired was in the shape of a. signal letter headed " the Radi ca l Li eutenant- C o - for an a eor c Hastings, s ings, and th a t was the Lieutenant-Co lonel," and purporting to be signed by Col. Williams himself, which was published in Mr. Collinridge's paper. The letter stated that the Colonel did not possess one shilling interest in the town, and expressed his regret that when, rather fresh at the Radical dinner, he should have attacked a gentleman of respectability, who had expended thousands for the benefit of Hastings, because fault had been found with his (the . Colonel's) improve ments. The proposed pier was described as a pretty little shingle trap, and the letter which bore the sig nature of Colonel Wil liams, was follow ed by a note from that havingt this the Editor, recomme ndin g ever y s oldier who set up the trade of a Radical to the sell to because a Radical sol dier was a di sgrace to the army. of Brighton ss Colonel Williams,iid feeling r, no stating s, naturally paperef publication, rerr addressed ing to it, a the smallest pretension t o character, would have inserted what was so evidently a falsehood, with out ma ki ng d ue inquiry, and regretting that the love of truth and ho nesty had been so comp letel y lost in the political par tisan. Shortly afterwar ds another article appeared, in the same paper, remark in g u p on the letter previously letter published, and stated that there was nothing in it but what was gentlemanly and honourable. It charged Col. Williams with having told an impudent falsehood of a respectable inhabitant, an d havin g refu sed to pay a debt of honour for some newspapers sent to him. It also 10.1, legt,l titni be was a travelling tink to town :to sow the seeds of dissension between and wnrkmen, and :assuring him that they should watch his proceedings and expose them to the world. On the 12th of September a letter was addressed to Colonel !Williams from the Bull Inn, Aldgate, signed by Mr. - ,Collinridge, in which he stated that he had just seen in the Sussex Express a letter bear ing the signature of Colonel Williams, containing observations of a strongly perSonal nature, in regard to the publication which appeared in the Southern Adver 'it;ser—that lie exercised no control over . these publica tions, and .seldom saw them un t il there were in type. That there being no just ground for Colonel Williams's sweeping observations, he requested him to retract them, or favour him with a reference to a friend for an imme diate meeting. That letter was forwarded by Colonel Williams to his solicitors in London and on the 17th September they wrote to Mr. Collinridge at the address iven in his letter, 299, Strand , stating that it was their intention to apply to the Queen's Bench at the earliest moment for a criminal information. No notice was taken of that letter, and on the Ifith September another letter was sent by Mr. Collinridge to Colonel Williams, statiog.that after his (Mr. C.'s) distinct disavowal ec any participation in the publication complateo of by Colonel Williams, he was bound as gentleman to with draw the i t n he m o to b tk sei c : i vations had made, or uphold place. That letter Colonel Wil liams also sent to his solicitors, .and on the 18th September, a third letter was sent to him by Mr. Collinridge, charging him with having published a palpable falsehood—that as lie had not the courtesy to retract, or the courage to support, the charges he had made, he (Mr. Collinridge) must denounce his statements as lies, and his actions as cowardly to the last degree. Another letter having been written to Mr. Collinridge by Colonel Williams's solicitors a paragraph appeared in the Southeru Adverti,o,, stating that the %then! Gentle man, Colonel Williams, had applied to the Court of Queen's Bete + • for- protection, And _that their renders would shortly be amused bv the publication of the eor respondence. The Learned Counsel having commented upon the several attempts made to provoke Colonel Wil liams to a breach of the peace, observed that they had shown the letters of Mr. Collinridge to two persons in London, and another person in Sussex, who all at once admitted them to be his handwriting, but refused to make affidavits to that effect, unless compelled by the Court. There were there three gentlemen who swore that from what they heard these three persons say, they were of opinion that the letters were in Mr. Collinridge's hand writing. Lord PENMAN--That is clearly insufficient. Mr: JERVIS submitted that the party had given his address as 299, Strand, and two of the persons who re cognised the handwriting were employed at his office there. The Court would be doing no injustice in call ing upon the defendant to deny that the letters were in his handwriting if he could do so. Mr. Justice COLERIDGE doubted very much whether a Grand Jury could find a bill upon such evidence. Mr. JERVIS said if the Court thought the evidence was insufficient, he must go further, and endeavour to procure direct evidence of the handwriting. Lord PENMAN did not think that .Court should exer cise the inquisitorial power which g'uch a rule would re cognise, and compel a party to come before it and clear himself sufficient evidence. Mr. JERVIS wished to know if bringing before the Court the evidence of parties who knew the handwriting would be sufficient. Lord DEN MAN—We have sivrays said that gentlemen should come fully prepared in these cases in the first instance, or not at all ; and I am sure you will recol lect many instances in which we have so acted.—Rul• refused. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Nor. 5. Before the LORD CHIEF JUSTICE, Justices COLT/4AX, MAULE, and ERSKINE.) PUNTER V. LORD GRANTLY. Mr Sergeant SHEA made an application of a very peculiar nature: It appears that the defendant had refused to pay the costs of the action to the attorney of plaintiff, on the ground that the latter had'not taken out his certificate during the years in which the action was pending. Mr. Sergeant Shea's application upon affi davit was that the attorney, Mr. Neale, should be re admitted urn payment of the arrears upon his certifi cate, and of such nominal fine as the Court might, under the circumstances, be pleased to impose. He founded his application upon these facts as set forthin the affidavit, that Mr. Neale, who resides at Guildford, was admitted an attorney of this Court in the year 1799—that in the years 1838, 1839, and 1840, he transmitted to his son, who is an attorney, residing in London. and is his agent here, the money to take out his certificates, which the latter neglected to do. • The attorney for the defence was willing to pay , the costs if the Court assented to the pre sent motion. The LOAD CIIIEF JUSTICE, having conferred with the other Judges, said, that as there had been a great deal of feeling in this case, and as the parties seemed, from the latter part of the Learned Sergeant's statement, to be disposed to come to a better understanding, the Court would grant a rule to restore Mr. Neale, upon payment of the arrears, and a fine of 6s. Bd. Mr. Sergeant SHEA expressed his sense of the kind ness of their Lordships, and was bound to say that the defendant's attorney had made a very handsome offer, taking all the circdmstances into consideralim. EXCHEQUER COURT, Nov. 5. FAUNTLEROY V. JONES. This was an action of trover to recover a number of packs of wool, which was tried before the Lord Chief Baron at the late assizes held at Flint, when his Lord .... ship nonsuited the plaintiff. The ATTORNE - GENERAL now moved for a rule nisi to set aside the nonsuit, and enter a verdict for the plain tiff. He said his client was a large dealer in wool; the defendant Jones was a flannel manufacturer, who had very considerable business transactions with him. During the last year he introduced a person named Howell to the plaintiff as one who had succeeded to his business. Howell gave an order for wool to the amount of 691. for which cash was paid, and the money was traced to have come from Jones. The next order was to the amount of 3671., which sum was likewise paid by Jones' money. The third order amounted to 4601, which was partly paid for in money, again from Jones, the remainder was paid for by a bill from Howell. The fourth order was for 361/, part of which was again paid for in cash, and the remainder by bill from Howell; :and one more transaction of a similar nature took place be fore the first bill was due. All the bills were dishonoured, and upon inquiry the plaintiff found that Howell had never been a flannel ma nufacturer—that all the wool had been taken to the premises of Jones, and had been sold by him to pay off a debt of between 4,0001. and 5,0001. owing to him by Rowell. He (the Attorney-General) contended that the fraud was so palpable that, according to the cases of Abbott v. Parry and Hill v. Parrott, the property in the goods had not passed out of the plaintiff, and there fore trover would lie. Mr. Baron PARKE—Undoubtedly fraud would vitiate the contract, but the question here is, part of the money value of the goods having been paid could the action of trover be maintained without a tender of repayment? The ATTORNEY- G ENERAL said that was the real question, and a most important one it was, for if the Court held that a tender was necessary any person who had determined upon committing a fraud would take care to pay some part of the purchase-money. In this case it was abundantly clear that the object of Jones was to get payment of the debt owing • him by Rowell, out of the property of the plaintiff. He trusted that, as the ease was so important to the commercial world, the Court would think it was one deserving of further consideration. The COURT—Yes ; we think it deserves further atten tion, therefore you may take a:rule.—Rule nisi granted. HARDMAN V. BELIIOUSE. This was an action for 350/., which was tried before Mr. Justice Wightman, at the late Liverpool Assizes, when a verdict was found for the defendant. Mr. KNOWLES now moved for a rule nisi to set that verdict aside, and for a' new trial, or that the verdict should be entered for the plaintiff. There were several pleas, but the fourth and latter one, was the only mate rial one. It was as to 3501., that the defendant had de livered a certain bill of exchange, drawn by APLella.n upon KLellan, which had been accepted in satis faction of the defendant. The evidence in the cause showed that it was an action against one of the partners of a house in Canada, to which the plaintiff had made certain consignments. The defence was, that the custom of the trade was that the parties in Canada should purchase good bills in that colony which were to be accepted in payment of the goods so consigned—that at the time the bill in question was purchased it was a good bill, as M`Lellan's house was then in high repute, and therefore was a full pay ment of the debt. He contended that the Learned Judge had not left the only question in the cause to the Jury, which was, had the bill been received by the plaintiff in satisfaction of his claim. Now that was abundantly dis proved, because as soon as it was received it was pro tested for non-acceptance, and the pro test sent out to Canada immediately. They hel d the bill, it was true, but only as the agent of the defendants. Having sent out the protest immediately, clearly proved that the bill was not accepted in satisfaction. That he con ceived was the real question raised hy the issue, and it had not been put before th e Jury, which he considered entitled him to a rule.—Rule nisi granted. MORRIS, CLERK, V. THE DUKE Oy NORFOLK. Mr. KELLY moved •for a new trial in this case, which was tried before Mr. Baron Alderson, at the late Suffolk Assizes, when a verdict was found for the plaintiff. This was an issue direc ted to t r y the validity of a mo dus set up by the defendant, in respect of a farm, of about 400 acres, situated in a parish . in Norfolk. In IA consequen ce of the form action it was the duty of the defendant to prove the affirmative ; he commenced, and proved that after the p ass i ng , of the Tithe Commutation Act, the modus was set up and supported by the Tithe Commissioner, but the plaintiff appealed, and the issue was dir ec t e d. It appeared that the defendant was owner of the farm in question, as well as much other prope r ty i n t h e parish - that from the year 1741, up to 1820, it was di st i nct l y proved that 141. a year had been paid fo r t h e t i t h es ; during that period there had been five rectors, who had a ll received that sum as the tithes for the farm in ques .tion; and that from 1803, until 1820, the plaintiff himself had received the same sum. The reverend plaintiff was in some way connected with the family o f t h e l ate D u k e . Upon his death, in that year,:some unpleasant feelings {rose, intc, 1.- further but, tlipse proceedings giros, , that I.,i. , understatidiog the dOcumentery and parole evidence ailanced before the Jury, -not one document or any parole evidence was offered on the part of the Plaintiff ; whether the Counsel on the other side from any strong expression of opinion on the part of the Judge, or from some other cause, he thought the cause would be better in the hands of that learned person than .in his own, and left the case - with, a very - few observations. Ire com. plained that throughout the whose address of the Judge to the Jury, for it was no summing up, he never once alludedd-to the mass of evidence produced on the part of the defendant. lie told them that it was necessary ; in order to make a modus good, it was neces sary to support it by strong documentary evidence, and especially by some receipts from former rectors, stating that the money was received upon a modus. Mr. Baron PARKE—What is the value of tii tithe in kind ? Mr. KELLY—One. 'witness stated it to be 1201. The Learned Cowls!: cited several cases, upoa the authority of which- contended, he was entity',, to a rule. rp. LORD CHIEF BARON said ttey would consult with 11r. Baron Alderson before 'iming to any decision. BAIL COURT, Nov. 5. Lord MARCUS Ilua. took the oaths this morning, in this Court, in ordor to 'qualify himself as a Privy Coun cillor. RICHMOND V. COLE. In this case an action had been brought by the plain tiff, a chemist and druggist, to recover the sum of 71. Gs. from the defendant for medicines supplied to the defendant's son, a young man residing at Clapham. The. case came on for trial before the Secondary of the City of London, in the month of August last, and a verdict was returned for the plaintiff with 40s. damages. r. .1 now applied for a rule nisi for x nomutit or for a new trial, cot the .. g.romul .-Otatt lied Medit•ine. as AI; apothreary, and had not produe,d auy eertificate front the Apothecariva . Company, nor had he shown that he was in practice as an apothecary prior to 1815. This, he contended, the plaintiff was bound to do, inasmuch as he had been applied to by the defend= ant's son for advice, and had prescribed for him, and supplied him with the medicines which he thought ne cessary. This the plaintiff had not done, and therefore the Learned Counsel contended the plaintiff ought to have been nonsuited. This point had been submitted to the Secondary at the time of the trial," and that officer, in summing up the case to the Jury had said that if a chemist gave advice, and supplied medicines, and only charged for the medicines supplied as he would have done if he had not given any advice, then he would be entitled to recover. Now, that, he (Mr. Chambers), contended, was such a misdirection as entitled him to a rule for a now triaL Mr. Justice PATrEsoN—Take your rule on both grounds.—Application granted. PINKNEY V. BOOTH. This was a case which had been tried before the She riff of Yorkshire, on a writ from this Court. The writ was returnable on the 27th July, and on that day the case had been trie d , but the Jury had not returned their verdict until after twelve o'clock at night. It was for the defendant. • Mr. NEWTON now moved for a rule to arrest the judg ment, on the ground that as the writ was returnable on the 27th, the time had expired at twelve o'clock on the night of that day, and that consequently the Sheriff had no power of receiving a verdict after that hour.—Rule nisi granted. 'I he fine was immediately paid, and the prisoners wee discharged. - Frederick Fran.& was placed at the bar, before Mr. Jardine, on a charge o f stealing a cash-box, c o ntaining two 20L notes, two Si. notes, twelve sovereigns, and abotit in silver. William Fox stated, that he is the landlord of the Windsor Castle, in Charles-street; Westminster. The prisoner was in witness's service as a pot-boy. The ma hoganpbox produced was the property of witness, -sad he used it as A cash-box. _about half-past four, Jt, the afternoon of Tuesday, • the 2d of November, - lie saw safeb deposited in the box, two 20/. 'Lank of r- E ug •h o ,,l notes, two, ;notes, twelve.soyerelea, ,'about silver, as well as , his' liceose and oit, er Dif . l „„ ra The .gold wits i,i a leather bag', Nithi!",:l l , With oilier por tions of the property, was produce!"J About Len minutes past six o'clock, witness sate t i e prisoner leave the bar, and he did not again see br m until after he had been - taken into custody. W•;!.ness went to the bar about a quarter of an hour elver the prisoner had left the house, when he discover& that the property had been removed. - James Cleincy,s, a superintendent of police in Can terbury, whet,, the prisoner had been arrested, 'stated that on Wednesday the 3d of November he gave direc tions to Police Constable Morley, inconsequence of in fornAW.On he had received, to,apprehend the prisoner, wilf:was brought to the station-house in Canterbury be t".veen seven and eight o'clock in the evening. Witness told him he had been charged with a felony, and asked him to give up any portion of the property he might still have in his possession. The prisoner then drew out two twenty-pound notes ; and three sovereigns and a half, and thirty-shillings and eight-pence, were after wards found upon his person. The police officer Morley, on inquiring at the Guildhall Tavern, where the prisoner had;slept, found there the cash-box, and a carpet-bag. The prisoner was fully committed for trial. . MONEY MARKET and CITY NEWS. FROM THE MORNING PAPERS OF YESTERDAY. TIMES.—The examinations at the Mansion-house re lative to the Exchequer bill affair, have necessarily occu- pied almost exclusively public attention, as people look to that source now fa something like authentic informa tion, instead of dealing with rumours and conjectures. That judicial ,investigation, moreover, renders it ob viously improper to give circulation to many state ments which are current on the subject, es that might inteirers ivitti the cour,, uf justice or pnijinlice the parties- aoctited:-. • •IJ 4ii tttg.- ion.:es, it sippwlrs that r+- slow progress is t.,-dav in tine delivery of Exchequer bills marked :As genuine ; indeed, so Inueli so, that very great complaints are made on the subject; and making allowance for dark days, as well as a slug gish rate of performance, the general belief is that the investigation will last out the year. It is said that Lord Monteagle manifests very great anxiety to con vince those bankers and capitalists who visit the Treasury on this occasion, that his system of nia nagement is a very complete one, and, in fact, such as to render fraud or an irregular delivery of bills quite _ _ impossible. This in itself has in some instances made a avourable impression on the parties ; but then they naturally ask themselves whether that can possibly be a good system which has produced results so notoriously bad as those now before the public ? Hence, however plausiblelbe Noble Lord may be, his efforts are treated on the whole with a great deal of ridicule, and they place him in this very awkward dilemma, that if his system really was a good one, it was very badly admi nistered, so as to reduce it to a very defective or bad one. It seems to remind people of what happened at the Royal Exchange, when all the " fire-proof " chests and boxes were found, when opened, to contain tinder only, though in the newspapers of the same day there appeared various advertisements from the makers of " infallible fire-proof boxes." The business in Stocks to-day was not large, but %no tations were pretty steady. In the early stage of deal ing an improvement of full * per cent. upon the latest values of yesterday were quoted, but they were not quite so good at the close of the day. CHRONICLE.—The propriety of waiting upon the Premier by a deputation of bankers and others, to re present the case of the bona fide holders of Exchequer bills, has been discussed in the highest monetary circles, and in the meantime postponed in consequence of the apprehension of Rapallo, who was remanded for ten days, after a lengthened examination at the Mansion house to-day, at which Mr. Perceval, the Deputy-Comp troller of the Exchequer was present. Mr. Perceval, it is said, brought a parcel of bills with him, amount ing to 15,0001. or 16,000 L, which he exhibited as forged, stating that at first he had great difficulty in disting uishing the genuine from the fictitious, but that he now felt no such embarrassment, and could at once detect the spurious bills. The only reason we have heard adduced for this certainty of detection is that the stamps on the fictitious bills are less vigorously impressed on the paper than on the genuine bills, and that there are private notches, or marks, in the margin of the checks denoting the relative positions of the bills in the books at the Exchequer-office. That there are for instance, three bills on each page, 1,2, and 3, and that there is a corresponding mark on the corner of each genuine Exchequer bill issued, which does not exist in the spurious paper. This looks very like a se cond or after thought ; at least we cannot perceive the sense of asking the holders to send up their bills to be examined with the counterfoil, if the Comptroller- General was possessed of private marks of any kind by which he could at once detect the forgeries. If this be the case, the Government notice should have declared the fact at first, and intimated to the public that those which were not genuine could be at once distinguished, and that the others would be im pounded or rejected as forgeries. This story of the pri vate mark goes far to prove that the Government begins now to feel the fallacy of the test of the counterfoil, and that they must have stronger means of proof. `.lhe com parison of the counterfoil is not only untenable as a proof of forgery, but it is evidently useless, unless every bill were cut out separately. It two or more bills were cut at the same time, a spurious bill might pass the test of the counterfoil with impunity, and there might be vari ous bills presenting the same identical checks in the margin, so as to correspond with the counter foil. But, apart from all risks and possibilities of that description, let it be supposed that the signa ture " Monteagle " has been written, not by the Comptroller-General or his deputy, but by Mr. Beaumont Smith, which is the worst view of the case possible for the holders, it seems very doubtful whether, even in that case, the Crown would successfully main tain the plea of forgery amongst those who give a fair value for the bills. In every respect, with th sole ex ception of the name, the spurious bills are genuine, the watermark, the printing, the Government stamp, the numbers, and every distinguishing feature on which the Public could rely, or by which they were called upon to judge, are genuine, official, done by Government order, or by Government officers, and the only defect is said to bein the writing of the name " Monteagle," which on the genuine bills is admitted to have been signed legally by three different persons. The simple question to go to law about would be whether the supposed evidence or confession of Mr. Smith, that he signed the name Monteagle and used the bills so signed for his own purpose, is or is not sufficient to reject the claims of the innocent holders, on the ground that the bills are forged. Whether there bo some little corner notch or other private cut in the corner of the paper, which shows the relative part of the book from which the bills were cue or not, there can be no doubt whatever that the paper itself, the printing, the numbers, and the stamps on the spurious bills are ge nuine. The only point, the only case for the Crown is, whether the possible evidence or confessionof Smith be sufficient to prove forgery, coupled with the evidence of Rapallo, and the opinion of the Comptroller- General or his deputy, as to the false or genuine nature of the signatures. Were the latter, how ever, cross-examined in the witness-box, it would soon ie proved that they could not tell their own signatures if shown a bundle of bills in which there was a mixture of good and bad ; and as to Rapallo's testimony, as far as we have yet seen, it only proves that he knew Smith's necessities, and was not scrupulous about ascertaining the means by which he obtained the bills. Even if Rapallo should be found cognisant of the manufacture of the bills by Smith, we do not see - that his possible guilty knowledge could in the slightest degree impugn the rights of the innocent holders. The question at issue can be in no degree changed, as respects the bona fide holders, by any addition to the number of parties who may be implicated in the guilt of Smith. The only case for the Crown is still restricted to the mere legality o f the signatures, the disputed bills being in all o ther re tefs clearly and indisputably genuine. The Comm it eoof the Stock Exchange met yesterday and t - , e Y c i to examine farther into the transactions of th"urinsiaon. brokers with Smith and Rapallo, but came to no deci sion. In LLOYDS' SHIPPING. LoNDON, Nov. 3.—Wind this day at noon S., variable. OFF ReNSGATE, Nov. 3.—Diana, Hamburgh for Bahia. DEAL, Nov. 4.—WindN.E. to E.S.E.—Arrd. Geran dus Jacobus, Rotterdam for Batavia. Arrd. from the River, Ospery, New Zealand. Sld. T r opic, Barbadoes. L I VERPOOL, Nov. 4.—Wind S.S.E.—Arrd. Chine, Phillips, Bombay—saile d from St. Helena, Sept. 14 ; Greyhound, Doctor and Darsey, Buenos Ayres; Britannia, Quebec; Crazy Jane, Patter, Prince Edward's Island; Elizabeth, Smyrna. Sld. °davit', Lima; Swallow, ' Val.. paraiso; Monarch, St. Lucia ; Jane Smith, Vera C ruz . Edinburgh, Mobile ; James Parkins, Charleston : c a b,: donia, steamer, Boston; Dee and John Taylor, Africa. DUBLIN, Nov. 3.—And. Kingston, M'Lean, Chi na . Ancona; E.N.E.to E u E lY manuel, sailed April 28, Singapore June 11. Anger J uly 8 , St. ' Helena Sept. 9, with considerable damage, having been in Li n in contact with a bark, supposed the W oo dman, Chatham. nn Banrobo: b p r o o ere l oz t oil breezes.—Acrd. .Bombay,trArrdon. ANn p o Sept. NC, . a r 17 4 , r. : _i I n dunis; H.M.S. t o n 3 a . S ; 0 . Dia ry,slt lon . dr A rrived vse 1. Sewell, fresh toi e un r Harleci — u id in A: B rr r d it . a Ariad i‘ V i i u n i c in en ee t, r, T ß O a lla , ia. PLYMOUTH, Nov. 4.—Wind N.E. to S.s y London, Sydney. Put back, nom. s •-•—saiied a w u i - t p h r r i u n d ee d . e r s id. damaged. petre 1 , tarnum Abbey, Demerara. K r amer, Port Barba d oes ; Llan- F:::::N,oNN:S4v)._lB3s.ey, paNcilwet,S:th `va les; e off—St. -- 6LInE, NOV. 3.—Arrd. Sirius, Quebec. SHEERNESS, OCT. -29.—Arrd. Athelia Riga, for Belfast, with loss of boat, and erew in a auto 4 • of mutiny. D u mnc, Nov. 2.-Arrd. Wexf or d , Quebec. John 's, .3 KINGSTOWN, Nov. 3.—Arrd. noratio, Tafffill9.-€ 4 . N.B. CORK, Nov. 2,—Arid. Mary and Eliza-Wit" %trot. St. JOhn's, with sails split; Lady Turner, New t 3 nd land. '4•" .. mivFoup;' Nov. 3.—Arrd. Evervrood, Swansea •Loadop, leaky. The,G-overnor M'Lean, "May; from British Accra, is Supposed. bc utrived off Yarmouth. LEWES V. AMOR. This was an action tried before Mr. Sergeant Arabin, to recover the amount of attorney's bill. The defendant pleaded—first, never indebted; second, that th• defend ant had got rid of the debt by a bankruptcy, subse quently to the contracting of it ; and third, that it was contracted for an immoral purpose. On the last issue no evidence whatever was offered. The existence of the debt was proved, and it was likewise shown that the plaintiff had been employed by the defendant in March, the bankruptcy having taken place in the February preceding. The verdict was for the defendant in all the issues. Mr. JERVIS now moved for a rule nisi for a new trial. Mr. Justice PATTESON—Have you Mr. Sergeant Ara bin's notes ? Mr. JERVIS—No, my Lord. We have paid for them, and they were to have been sent to your Lordship yes terday, but as they had not arrived, I abstained from moving. In other Sheriffs' Courts the usual practice is for parties to pay ss. to the Sheriff's clerk, for which the notes are supplied to the parties ; but the practice adopted by Mr. Sergeant Arabia is, that each party pays 148. to the clerk, and the notes are supplied to neither of them, but are sent to the Court. _ _ Inquiries were made whether the notes had been sent by mistake to the other Court, when it was found that they had not yet been furnished. Mr. Justice ParrEsoN—l ought to have the notes be fore me. liowever,l think you have shown enough to entitle you to your rule, even without the notes. Application granted. INSOLVENT COURT, Nov. 5. IN THE MATTER OF JAMES HIGHWAY. The facts of this case were rather singular, and oc cupied the Court from its sitting, at ten o'clock, until past six. The wife of, a person, named Bromley, had separated from her husband, and accumulated about 5001., which she gave, at her death, to her cousin, the insol vent's wife, for the benefit of a sister named Gage. By the verdict, in an action brought by Bromley against the insolvent, tho latter was required to refund the 5001., which he refused, and was, in consequence, taken in execution, and now appeared in Court, on his petition, to be discharged, on the grounds that he had expended all the money, and was at present without property. Mr. COOKE, on behalf of Bromley, the opposing creditor, called a number of witnesses, from whose evi dence it appeared that the insolvent had invested the money in the funds at various times, and who likewise proved that the money with which he purchased the stock was the same as what he received on account of Bromley's wife, and that stock to the amount of 2551. was still held in the insolvent's name. The Learned COMMISSIONER said, in this case, if the money had been all expended, he should inflict the ex treme penality which the Act allowed for fraudulently making away with property ; if, on the other hand, there was stock or Exchequer bills to the amount of 2551. in the insolvent's possession, which he gave up to the assignee, Mr. Bromley, he might go out of prison to morrow. lie should, therefore, enter a conditional dis charge upon the books of the Court. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. G UILDHALL. CAUTION TO TAVERN AND COFFEE-HOUSE-KEEPERS. —Anne Linder, alias Payne, alias Creasy, a respectable looking female, apparently about 25 years of age, was placed at the bar before Sir Peter Laurie, on a charge of swindling a host of tavern and coffee-house-keepers, and other tradesmen. A man named Payne, who at one time passed for the prisoner's husband, also attended on the charge, but not in custody. It appeared from the evidence of upwards of 20 per sons, whom the prisoner had " victimised," that she re presented herself as daughter of a gentleman named Finden, who died some years since, and left her property to a vast amount, situate in Tottenham-court-road, Fitzroy-market. and various other places, together with a quantity of stock and property in the funds. The man Payne and she lived at the different taverns and coffee-houses as man and wife, and in many instances she succeeded in borrowing money to a large amount. One of the victims, Mr. Clarke, of the George Tavern, Castle-street, Leicester-square, in a half-comic, half serious style, informed Sir Peter that the female prisoner told him she was the owner of the " Castle" at Tooting, and after borrowing some money from him invited him to come there to spend a few days with her. When he went, instead of the lady who favoured him with the in vitation, he found a jolly red-faced landlord, who knew nothing of her. From two or three of the witnesses she borrowed arti cles of wearing apparel, which she never returned. Mr. Thomas Finden said he resided in the New-road, and the person whom the prisoner claimed as her father was his brother. She had been frequently with him of the subjeet of her imaginary claims, and he had also been visited by Mr. Birch, the solicitor to the Southamp ton estates, on the same . subject. He (witness) was the executor under his brother's will, and there was not the slifflhlteesptrtisrountleiri,n i t n h e a p m rer a i s n o n n z 'si in c d l c i m a t i o v r e s o t a f t e superior tact and some education, made a long statement , asserting that she was the daughter of Mr. Finden, s brother, who died worth a deal of money, the wh o l e o f which vas to come to her in the event of two other children? death, which had since occurred. Sir P. LAURIE said no man was safe if such claims as the prisoner's could be made with impunity. He feared he could not treat dealings with the persons appearing against her criminally, but he would remand her to next Thursday on the charge of stealing the wearing apparel. BOW -STREET. Two respectably-dressed young men, who gave their names as John son an d French, were placed at the bar before Mr. Jardine, on a charge of having violently as saulted, on Thursday evening, Mr. Baker, a tobacconist in Fleet-street, and Mr. Henry Page, a tradesman re siding in Clare-street. It appeared from the evidence of the complainants, that while walking down the Strand, at about half-past ten o'clock on Thursday evening, they came in c ontact at at the corner of Southampton-street with the prisoners, w ho were at the time " waltzing" on the pavemen t with som e .. women of the town. The prisoner French immedlatelY struck Baker across tho head with a stick, an din th e e . scuffle which ensued both complainants wer e . v ery . vi lently treated, their clothes and perso9s being l to compensate 'The prisoners, who expressed star s light have done the complainants for any inj . urv red Y ,i they had been the injured. them, stated that they consicilnstance. On meeting the aggrieved parties in the first complainants they knocked down by the com- Johnson said he bad been had been pushed about by them, and plainant Page. the time the outrage took place, loon, osedthat the prisoners had evi dentlythat they were surgeons, turd A police s constable odnrei nrsns gt 2 t d a j d p jo to is th on p g n ave his address at Portman-square. The M.kdisTitATE, after commenting on the violence of their conduct, sentenced them each to a fine of 61. • Fenchurch.street, Nov. 5, tB4l. 1 1 E GENERAL STEAM NAVIGA-1 miE k v,°X COMPANY'S zplendid and powerful " 801 PS ire •sppointe.i to SAll. t.om the Co , toin ~6 1 sFr 2 n4\ 1 ,,„ "rati . " 10 , 116TTERD . ANI, sod OSTEND—every AN T WERP Saturday morning. HAv b .„—every Sunday and Thursday Morning. . Alorni n ;r---The JAMES WATT, Nov. 14 and 25, at Eight 46,, From London Bridge Wharf, for /1001 n 8 --Every Thursy Thursday and Saturday. end Sucda. RUT y Tuesda and Friday, at Eight Morning. " ul OUTH_Every y Saturday Evening, at Six. U l t Nin From Brown's Wharf Poplar, for Uesd a - "URGH--every Saturday, and every alternate Wed- Y Evening at Ten. Nov. 6, 13, 17, 20, and 27. tiEw r , From Downe's Wharf, for • SUN rt ," lB TLE—Wednesday and Saturday Evening at Eight. „ T „ I ILAND—Every Tussday, at Seven Evening. 9111: es -e u, re Berths, and far all information, apply at the teat. I I the Company, 69, Lombard-street ; and 37, Re ' • M , ll -„SUANT to a DECREE of the HIGH koh i sVITRT of CHANCERY, made in a Cause, NASH v. et t„f-Y, the N ex t o f Ki n c f JOHN WILKINSON, late hov er b 7Y - street, Pimlico, in the Parish of St. George's, Ha ' t itle re , in the County of Middlesex, Esq., living at the Ar t : is death (which happened in or about the month of 4 ,t sty ',. 1833 ),or the personal representative or representatives lure such Next of Kin who have since died, are, on or be eot,„,-"e Ist day of December, 1841, by their Solicitors, to 1. 141 41 t - r ' i u before WILLIAM WINGFIELD, Esq., one of the vaildinr; of the said Court, at his Chambers in Southampton r,,• r Chancery-lane, London, and prove their Kindred Peret; ; ;;;„` 9f, representation, or in default thereof, they will be r"'""Y excluded the benefit of the said Decree. °I. 2, 18 41. W. WINGFIELD. WILDE, REES, HUMPHREY, and WILDE, _ Plaintiff's Solicitors, College Hill. zoncitors, AS EASY TO SELL, AS TO BUY; T h Or, DE MAND MADE to DEPEND on SUPPLY. 4 ritl present Scarcity of Money, arid the consequent chec k ?e,iCi i : s arrassm en t thereby experienced in a ll matters of bust +Grail rendered the establishment of Banks of Interchange Ti .,_ , nds of useful property indispensably necessary. b er, ,!,refor e th e M anagers of t h e C ommercia l T ra di ng Cham -I),llerner of Devonshire-street, Portland-road, St. Mary .le tre or l s eA to inform the Public generally that their premises Us e f u l" expressly f or th e p ur p o se of effecting Interchanges of 111 C owls upon systematie arrangements, independent of ip th l*n for b us i ness d a il y from Ni ne i n t h e M orn i ng till Eight l' arti e e fi ve ning, where Prospectuses may be had, and furt her known.