The Sun. — London, England, 1819-06-15 00:00:00

it proposea duty, written to their trttretrondetits lo hare lauded at Antwerp insteita of this country. Mr. IIESKISSf )N contended that the case mentioned by4he Noble Lord did not apply to the present question, as the IRill - against which the Petition had been received was one tending to introduce new regulations into the Excise, and not to raise any additional revenue. He thought that unless the House felt &goosed to open x new and a very inconientent course the oresent Petition cunld not he received. . Mr LONI. WELLESLEY made a few. observations, totally inattrPhle in the Gallery. Mr. P. MOrntE maintained that the Country had had Mt) . opportunity to consider the merits of the tax now proposed. The, House itself was - scarcely acquainted with the subj. ct. If Petitions against taxes were not to he receimd. then ... lt( taxes he proposed at an early part of the Session, when there would be abundant time. for their consideration. Mr. YiltOlifillAM contended that the Petition mentioned by his Noble Friend, was almost the:§Anie as the present. It bad been received in consequeneeaif .a'striet examination of 'the 3ournals•of the 'House, which . had afforded , nunievons precedents fur the course which had been adopted. Lord CASTLERF.AGH wished the House to abide by the general rule which had hitherto been observed. •• If Petitions were brought op, read, and then. rejected, that..mode would vertainly be both unfair and inconvenient, because it would then appear that it was their prayer which teas objected to. When it was known, on the contrary, - that - Petitions could not hr PeceOved ag:.enst a Tax Dill -when ;nice brought in, their rejection could nut be productive of disappointment to the country. He did not Mean, however, to say; that Ho nourable Members might nut Mahe motions and starts the substance of Petitions to the. House, although they could pot be received. Mr; S . I'PART WORTLEY read a note from. Mr. Hatsall's book, which stated that tits. Petition to'which , the Hon. and I.iartied (b (Mr. Brion:ham) had alluded, had only been received liecapse it had i. en presented by the Sheriff, of th-•dity of London, and lb,: by a Member, trod out of respect to that City: After a7few..vv9rol.from Mr. BitournzAw, the motion was negatived without.a division, . • • BREAO - 1 OF PRIVILEGE Mr. CANNING rose, before the House should proceed with tire business of the evening, to 'per; form a letinfel duty, etel intriele.oo its considera tion a cese deeply af f ecting its privileges. No men could be more sensible than he Was of the propriety of providing, whether by authoriziug, it convenient, or by coneivance, that all that pessed iii !bat House should be communicated to the cOnniry at •lerge. And if be .was of opinion that the footing on which . that conimenication nose stood was the most proper, it was because being an indulgence liable to abuse, it was de sireble•the House should keep in i , s own bands the means of repressing that abuse. During the t wenty-five years that he had belonged to Perlin- Ment, he had had but one occasion of uttering a complaint. That was during the last Session, and against the same Paper of twhich he now. haul agAio to-complain. That Paper bad then published Mew gross mist epresentatine of a transaction in which he and Mr. Speaker were concerned. Yet when Ire- had called the. ettentioa di the House to the subject, lie had only stated the Case, end-con !letting with the hope that the misrepresentation had been eccidental, le.ol declined putting. the. Rouse, in possession of -.the cause. of his corn pteiat, and only' wished it to operate as a warn ing.. Asa warning, ..he was sorry to-say, it had nut op'erated. In the present ease, it wonlci be, inipossible for a candid mind, tuaking,*every prim ticablenlleaWence, to attiibute the raiseepresenta- - tion to 'mistake or accident. It was so gross and so malignant in its nature, as, to. leave no doubt of its, being . svordiy the .notice of the HPuse; It happened diet hie had, been absent for two or three hours during the early part of the debate of faStToesilsy, when the Hon. MeMber for -Aberdeen (Mr, Moue), had made some-obser vation's., which his absence had prevented him bon; hearing. He-had come back,tothe House before the Hon. Member had sat down, but from the fe.nor of - die letter part a - sf his -speech, could hard ly suppose that any thing calculated tojeifieme t he p issjons h a d passed. What ices his stirprise, th,:.refore, to find in The Times Newspaper of the next morniug e the- tollowihg . passage asea. correct report of . what the Hots. Member had said Bands, trapped in scarlet and.gold, were daily paraded about the streets, as if to mark the squa lid poverty of the lower orders.—(Laeglttere (roan the Millis: rial Benches )—Ministris might laugh ; hut let them look at -the other sidteot tlw pic ture ; let them survey the misery of the poor, laborious, indoetrions wretches at Cadisle e ter even of the unhappy beiugs_ they meet in our streets, and lie believed that there would be found but one men among them who would still keep a suri;.• upon his countenance, 91141 1 . 11111 would be 4 sonde of seit-congratuletion from a 'Right Han. Cen-le min eMr.llatinin!2)—"my name inserted by the I , ,,titor, for t ste the illusion shotki be loie -4-4 then by habituellyaurning into ridicule the suf ferings of his tellow-creatures, be had bt en able to place hiluselt so tar above 'their .unhappy con e .. ditioi..—(Continued cheers.)m—Was there any tnan in the House, who would lay his hand upon his heatt and say, on the honour of a Genslemen, that such words, it not spoken by the• Honourable Member, could have been ac cideetaily inserted There was hut one impression aeon his Mind, and but one course to pursue,— Th e e was. to apply to the Honourable Gentleman Opposite, it'd inquire whether or: not he had ems played. the expreviens ascribed .to hint. This he had done, and as soon as other avocations allowed it; he bad ri-ceived from- that Honourable Gentle .. inan sucli'an enswer as completely satisfied him ) that be (Mr: H.) could 'not hove used thoseeepressions ; though, not having seen the Nee , spaper, he could 'not speak as p esitively as he expected to be able ,to do after reading the Ile rm He (Mr. G.) hail sent the Paper to that Hon. Gentleman, and a Noble Friend of his had brought from him a most clear, honourable, and satisfactory disclaimer. In consequence of this, he had given notice to that Hon. Member, last Seturday, that being satisfied the fault rested with the Newspaper, he should - bring this abuse of the privileges and indulgence of the House before its consideration on Monday, when he must request his presence. The House, lie trusted, would see that he was not influenced by any Motive of per soriel interest or irritation, Ile might indeed ,bave lett hurt had due attack proceeded from a re spectable quarter ; .but resting on such aatthority es it now did, it was far below his profoundest contempt. He had, however, a duty to perform -to tncsny Members 1t the House,,w'ho.stere not so . hardened as himself -against such attacks, and who would rather hear them in silence thanexpose theni selves to a repetition of them by noticing thenr:•:le was in :heir Herself prat 11c came forward. Libels. like the preslit were the more despicable; because the wretch who wriate:them. did not stand : forth openly, hot placed •wrespecfable IVl'...mbeer;:of. 4ho. /louse belore'bim as a cover.—(Hear, hear !)--- r t. ( l as l e site poker a any man Who heata the debates, and' marked the absence of 'certain Menthe's, to pet in the month of where the foulest libels on the absent. What course was open for him to pot site in swell of a remedy ? The law woteld Have been good,tor nothing. If hef had carried his eiemplaint 4o the Court of King's Bench he might have convicted the Editor -of The Times-of -aefibel Y lintewithout being sa tisfied that he had proceeded agaiest the right quarter, it would have afforded him no means of ascertainine whether the Hon. Gentleman hail used the offensive expressious. He would have punished the act, but perhaps :he innocent per son. If he had nut laid his complain,' before the Holise, he simuld not have known, as he now that, the whole hi-ne was attached- to the newspaper s . He had therefore no niternat-ive left, but a personal application to the Hon. Member. Was it not. theretore his duty, he woeld ask, to take,care that such an offence -should not he le pelted ? For even then he might hive made his appeal in vain. He might not have had the good furtu e e to d e al with such a Gentleman as the Hon. Member. tie might have wet with , one who, on the principal admitted by maUy Members, to dismiss from their minds all they have spoken, might have alii'Vered that he. knew nothing of newspaper reports, and that he (Mr. C,) must judgelor hirnself. This sort, of slander was new iii the Annals of licentiousness. It was calculeted to place i t oliviiinals iteucle a situation that they would have no alternative, but the extremity to Willett he had been compelled ,to have recourse, and which mig,lit not alwayS produce the saute restarts. In laying the Newspaper before the House, be crested it' would be seen that he Was - not gratifying; any feeling of self revenge, For hintself, he was perfectly satisfied. But for the [loose' collectively, for the dignity of its de bates, and the security Of their communication to the count, y, h.e entreated the House to take the offence into its most seriousconsideration.— He should not omit, that iu the satne NeWspeeer of this day there had appeared What he pre sumed was meant for an apology. This aeology commenced in the following manner :—" We re gret to state, that a eonsiderable error crept into our accoont-of Mr. lb - tine's speech on bringing up the Report of the Committee oil the Finance Resolutions on Tuesday evening "—A considera ble error! interpolation of a whole sen tence, and not of one sentence o ly, but of a mvhole scene ! It then proceeded—" In the great mass of matter which must every night he got ready for the press, after the debates in the two Houses are ended, or while they are going on, it is impossible that mistakes s!tould not sometimes occur. We can only say, that it is our most anxious desire to send forth er just and im partial representation of , what passes ; and wheuever we fail of success, such are still the paini we take, that we should hardly have to solicit indulgence - npou the plea of incuria futlit,' our failure must be laid to the imperfection of our common nature, !amiantus& paruni cavil natura: Mr. Hume spoke with much feeling and animation of the distresses of the poPr, anti ob e erviug, as we understOod by our Reporter, a smile upon the Minkteriel Beuches, is tepresemed by us as taxing only one flight Hon. Gebtletnep, Mr. Canning, with indulging in la - 110 )ler on so se-linos a subject. That Right honourable Gentleman, we have since learned, res not present. We shall not now. repeat the offensive passage for the sake of correcting it 5 sUtike: it c o t . e .,y, that Mr. Canning was not at tacked as described in our report, We are enabled, from the most authentic source, to lay before our reedets the passage which was- so miSuoder stood by otte'lieporter."—To this was subjoined the Same Report which the Hen. Gentleman had had the goonitees to send him as a correct state meot of What he had said.. It the case of, which he cotripiained were one of outissien or mistake., he ghoul(' noelreve thought it entitled to so' much notice. Bet what did the. Report seate:? Was it tint 'calculated to createa belief C,tit he,. being present;' had jollied in alangh at the sufferings of the people,- earl 'whilst in a long. artifieitle,entenee reproaches had been uttered almost .past human beating, that tie, sitting in that House, and with theit'Smile still flickering on his lips, bad hod the baseness not to say 'tote word in his own vindica tiona---(Heari hearlJ—This could not-be.: attri buted to mistake or tocomnion misrepresentation. It was not (vie• 'those inadverecticies which incuria fadit.'4.•-fie was more ready to :confess that- it might be attributed to the imper fections of human nature 5 for falsehood was one of 'its ..imperfections, and malignity_ eno ther.—(Hear, hear !)—This apology seemed, to him, even more than: the original offence, to require the notice of the House'; because, instead of allowing that Parliament had a right to complain of accidental errors, it essioned that it ought to • be grateful for, the accuracy with Which: the debates were reported. If this were admitted, Hon. Members would have no right to complain if they were unjustly sent forth to the detestation of the country. lie had also to re mark that the offence had been committed on Wednesday last, and it was not till Monday,:thet the apology had made its appearance. And:even then—he did not know the fact—but he thought it Might have been inserted at the suggestion of , the.Hou. Gentlemen opposite,, who, though he, was not one, had acted throughout in its friendly:, anti active a manner as if he had been an Mice, rested party. Meantime every Sunday and every country paper bad copied the offensive paragraph, and what good could so late an apology produce ? It this were allowed to pass mmoticed, the House Would abdicate the power and right which it pos sessed, of maintaining its own privileges, which were those of its. constituents. The House was bound to defend them against the encroachments of the Crown on the °fie hand, end against the encroachments of licentiousness on the other.— (Hear hear !)—la a case in which he .Was .him self concerned, he should not suggest: to the House any coure for its adoption lie placed the business in its hands, convinced that it would do what was bast. calcidated to maintain its, privileges, anti with them .the liberties of the country. — (Hear hear!)--He couciuJed by ,hying befo;e the . House The Times of Wednesday last and of, this neoeteie g . . ; , - The first extract containing the offensive pas •g'lgd then: feat by t 1:,.! C!eret , .., anti afterwards the' apology and the corrected averch, a 3 fo{- lotvy.t— -" Nii.HUME cumplained.pf the Manner in which Gentlemen on the other side of the HOose toad represented I be cOmlntlet of those on his side. The Right I ton. ember for Liverpool had taunted the Right HtM,Meinher on thelloor (Mr -Tierney) for stating that a reiltctiott of 1,000,0001. in the publit,expendi to re: might be ;Mille; and tilld the House, in O'sarciigt lc and ironical manner, that 2,.0001. trout the Lords of the'Admiralty. and Ct.ouol—frola_ aSeerg6try..o.LitAlt,t.....h:ttl rit..1)9 . 1 P. l 'o nut A for retrenchment, making the large sum of 3,0001. t,nl,; that on 1y . ftg2,0001., reimine.d to make up the million. :qr. 11 :floe regretted that that Right Honourable Gentleman was not pre sent, as he had last, night ridiculed 4he-idea of CC:0740111y, aiid had, 111 a Moct unwarrantable manner, t a usiii of flit, puny FriVlDgs of a few sir shillings and eightpences.• But let that and other Honourable Gentlemen cousider what support aid assistance, even such sinali sums would afford to respectable and indirstrins families, who could not at the'presetitilme obtain Si, much wages for-a whole .week of .hard labour. It could nut be alleged that the 1 , 11;.-t. trim. mt•mb,:r'%'.aa rant of those facts, as the petitions,on the (-Able, feptr) t he worl:tnen of Carlisle, Covent ry, and of Perth ,deseri bed in strong la - ngttagi. , the distress of those poor and .sufferin._; wretehes.• He (Mr. flume) could not detach his. feelings trout the ,on dition of thousands now under the grcatest'sofferin4s in cc; ry district of this ectnury,, particularly, ahem he tlt.aght that many cf 1110 . 5 e not' suffering penury and want with t belt fa milies; were. perhaps burn • with ,as good prospects in life:as himself or the Hight Hon. Gentleman. it. was very unfair, nay, altogether unwarrantable, to talk of such paltry'sturs as Gs. ad. only,haeing been proposed for redottion by the .om sitieen side'oi the House - , when it wait he in .the ~cou,c-thp) thp) ort be House that the,Honouyahle Member for Woorees , , ter had pointed out savings to the amount of 150.0001. and upwards in the army estimates; that. he (Mr—thoror).l.l. pointed out large sums,. andhad iactuaily moved the House to deduct 55,0001. from one"eslintate:- It Was too much' io have such statements tuade: by any Jinn. Mealher, wilco it was well known to the Wmise they could not b e ,cor-ect; and Mi. Hume complained Of tkm aS•atte'mpting to impose upon the House, luid divert AS attention frion the real state'uf the establishments of t lat; country.'.' • Mr. Huma said, whatever.sentiment.he tn;ght utter,on any occasion, .and however it might .he. called ill litiPSl ion, lie^ certainly would never shriek trout .ivowing. what ke had. actually . educed. But he tr.4o. , ted it w..s known to the House that he had- n6ver been guilty of that pct.- sonflity which,' in his htotible opinion, detracted from the force of every tact and every arenment in support Of any particular proposition_ He had . left the House at date o'clock in the morning, alter •he dt hate. and having to.attind a Commit tee, had quitted his own house at nine, to be-with the Committee at ten, and -in consequence he had. not received a note that was Rik - tressed to him of. the subject. Ile might be allowed to say of the, speech io. question, that .11e .ball not made it in an,4er, but on due reflection. When at-length . informed of the publication .that;4ad_taken place, he had said he could have no hesitation. in put— ling to paper %bat lie bad reallyitttered ;- at the same time retnatking, that be had not seen the • paper referred IQ, but denying that any one.sen teoce of that which. be was informed, bail' been• imputed to him was correct. lle had reqacsted the Richt Honourable Gentleman to send to. hint the 'Newspaper containing the report in questiotp to the ,Ulection Committee. .The Paper was sent„ and having read the speech published_ as Itis,. i he, could have no hesitation in raying,that, i.t.con tained as gross a caltonny. s on the Right Gentleman Aq could be sent forth to the ,w(trld.. He had instantly addressed. a „statement to this effect to the Right Honourable Gentlenlatt.': That rime (he hoped the Right Hon. (.ientletwii would excats,e it), it was hastily is on t) ,e table of that !louse, and as Soon,a, he got h ! imue, he committed to paper, as well as be could recol lect it, w hat he bad on Tuesday. Those who were near him on that day knew, that when lie was speakitig he had lirtikkokfonii44oe the Member fOr biveroool, and had regretted that lie was not in his place; 'or he didalot scruple.to say, that 1 . 1;o1 he been there, he Shotild haVe h4l . stronger language thiti ► that which 'he• genially oscd, on what be Understood the Right Ilorroutt-i able Gent!, min to have said on the sithjeft of . " puny tavings."• He tri,:ettuned this to prove• that he had no objection to avow What be had actually said. Owing to circumstances,' ro he bad before alluded, it Was not till Thors-thy night that he wrote down the beads of hiS Speech. On the foll,)wing' morning he trar.smitted it to the Right Honourable *Gen tleman, and he 'sahsequentltY sent it to the Editor Of the Paper in which the tnisrepreszan a , ion bad appeared, at the same trine retioiring him to make ao,apologyi and fret" give it all.t.hepoblicity WhiCit the calumny had received. This letterlhe had' sent by'a servant • of his own, and he teedied an answer to it, , stating the Editor to be then ont of town; •and this might account for the core rection not havitig appeared on Saturday, ,On Sunday morning he bad, however, received a let, ter from the Editor, who had certainly exotessed a very. st rong reeling of regret, and had- wished to wait on him to explain what occurred, lie (Mr. Hume) had, however, thought it better hot to accede to this request, as he wishedthe business. to be ,settled without more direct.. interfereuce on his part, and had accordingly declined seeing the Editor. He wrote a note , to this ideal, and sent some corrections of his speech, at the same time reminding the Editor that it was absolutely necessary iliac• he should make an, apology as ample as the correction with which he , had-been furnished, inahe face of the country,—. To this he received a note to' the following pnr-, port The Editor. of. 'The Times ' ,is touch obligerl to Mr. Hume for the communication with which Mr. Hume has favoured him, and would. be-; still more so if lie would havethe goodness to, snake known to Mr. Canning the Editor's regret! at finding his Paper has been made.' he vehicle of: the calumny complained of; The Editor cannot' himselfhe present' at the debates, out! is obliged' to plaCe confidence in the Gentlemen who attend , the , . H oose to report them—a . confidence which he, has hitherto had no reason to • re,gret should: . have been 'so placed, and in tbis inatance die is decidedly of opinion that the -misrepre- . sentatioti'complained of originated entirely in mistake, and not in any malignant linen.; lion, The Editor• would further say, he is so anxious to stand right with Mr. Home :and. Mr.. Canning, that,he would be happy to wait on , them at any hour they may : be pleased to with the Gentleman who reported the .speech, apologize for the error."—The Hon.,Member re-. marked, that so far as he was coocerned he could, aiot but regret this business. It there were a, 'Member of that Houle with which he stand•on good terms, it was the Right Honotir•' able GentleaLan, In the course of their business (if Ile might use the terns), it was likely thal.they. would have a good deal to-do together, and if any' thin: 4 en , ,Ati 4 .nc done for titc gout! of 'ill!. nri . tion, it • Was more likely to be atwomplished heir actin together titan Ity giving themstkes isp to 11,,,.e -c,"ssHry He vas sorr; that be shon!d have beeUrtTresented to hold the language imputed to hitit. Inv at the sanie dine, frorn . the earnest manner in eliich the . Edttai• hadesuiresscd regret for whatitati occarred, as well as citcnot" stances, thought there were goodie ,sons tot he" loving the assertion, that uhat lipd appeared t 9 the present instance wtis ladkriVy through. a mis' hopsilit:_wouldbe proved that it o il: . 'bOwe very the Edit'or had - he'd tin o pportunity• of p r ovitg:, Perhaps, had 11- - ( .1 - ; luvieYintlidged the Edhor , nylefMStli ting to see hip), he have been tibia to -explaisi ikavo:e , :ery thing lite. maligtiity.-- - ' (Cries . 04' . " N0,::),-- 7 11-e• telt that .ive !might hafts heen , the.,Cailf(C !tis ill: prevented Jrom ntaltd ing.an apology that have been deemed SP', • -- tisigctory.(Murtnors.)—F;ar himself be was of, . . . c)i);lllo l 3 . ,,tbai the calumny must have brigmateu mistake, and in mistslie alone. Mr..LUSH Ts: GT:.) t Iron , after the statement. made by his Rielit'lloir.nietid, the flosise feel that tbe.parg;raph coold not have nriginat 4 ' inisi;f;j', brit *oven' th,i effect otf de sign. lie begz s eit to recal•to. the Haase that it was hut last %reek -that-he had felt• it his duty to 'call the-at re.stion of the Housetti tire conduct of the saute Editor with-respect to the d e ha!eb of the, case-of Captain Harfchett. Hera(! then rep'' son to complain of the most foul misreptesentvc While on his. legs he begged so notice ttil use which bad been 1114de of the ea:l2llll6es whicn on that occasion had been sent abroad. moroiug be had received inforwatiott ,that nra4, persons at..cauterbirry who Were wiliticaly posed to him (Mr. Lushiitgton) were still cow. ',ince(' of the ionocence of Captain Hanchett, antis in . proso of his innocence had plibliShett extracts wlidt . ha'd appeared in the newspaper noW, Complained of. Thii, he Contended . , was to Make most use - Ot tlr4 breach of privilege which , the hlonsC overlooked—the report bag of their debates, and this he thought they were 4 0 1 11 )(1.46.0;e' t their authority to prevent forAlle"' I II) time to cow,. . . , ... . Mr. C. W.. WYNN was of. opinion that the 1 Nouse had but one eotirse to ptiroe—vs or der die? , Publisher toll,eirilti'r. -The permission, or fat he! i thg connivance et that House,- ,, au that breach oe [ privilege which had been no' iced,, he held to bet" 1 great and important t cfit to the eoirtury ; b" t Vit could only . he so ‘r.lvile their proceedinv.s woe S laid r iiTtllliii) ed., :and — 411611 - C1 "Aril raT ' - ciiisr , lcttt r ., I when their pnblica!iOn was converted into 'en etz d 1 giße,oj s viv4te'rirrilice. In the p re s e nt ea . e liq . i could not conceiv,e how. that which had Litten plAce 1 totild'hy possi.hil4 hethe result of accident. Tbz; l , seemed to him peculiarly that erase in - which tir s i.Etotise ivrt;:tif.)6o , l to iiiierfere. In iltii ca.se 'l. I bleach of privilegek , way cOntinitteil in many iii" - * I, , qtances,. ; f:,Tkey. knew that to publilt- tlieir de ... Witt: s Oat all was a bleach of the : Nivileges of thm I-TOnse , htit'tlrat-tolisetvit was not abused. they were vai. ll ° lug to overlook it. .A brea.ch of their pre,il.?.ge6 • wits c,titunsi;ted agAinst.thlt 11,1nber - from whom ~ ll the speech was rePretented to come ; and one w B9 i olsi..oternitted . itgainst the' - Right I lon. Gentle: mZi'ag,liii - 5,}11)21 the foul calurnov was direct cl• lie therefore thought the' House could pursue or, t ourr„)) n t t h at o f oidering -the'Pnblither of 4 !.Newspaper lo ifie bar Of . 116 t Intise. Ile' cOil . eludedin by‘ovin-g, • that " (.3j;ell be order'd to I. attend this Home to:niorro v." The 116-0 Melt ! ' tier said, he was not4nre Whether the noire usual i cotose of thelidusehad !teen first to decide whe;,, Ithei:qhat WhiCh'AsTA tlie.t , objf.ct of cOmplaint k. .0* I or :Nal not a hre'i-;ch'of privi;eges, or whether ro_c pifitySliiiiild first be ordered :o attend, learingl‘ I to the House 16 'ireterinine giCoseirent the ciii , " I tarter of the-P,aper. brought un.ler their conside" 1 ration', • ' . ,:_ • • RijeAtta said, both courses had been cottl:,. T4-.l`.;tliwrof a newspaper With brought, he fO.I . the flo o se in 1815, Ile was asked it he were th c . Editor.of -, ihe pziper, and allowed' to .matte his statement, and art er they had hear(!what he hif t ' tf;'say, - theltuM'Se came to Reshlittions. 'l'h= 4 was on a para L :raph ^which had appeared itt : l4 Newspaper. The prese.nt case was ditierent, -, $ 8 tkeTe - appeared 'on tho'fiectif it a breach of shelf privileges, in tl;e~puWishmg ot their debates. W. WYN - Ntv suggested that it might proper Weirder the Editor to attend. • , 1:4 N , ,,k.:4li t E.R. 111 krl: , rnOt . intr eite",, f°= .C. the Vrin,er. '1 he name of t h e li;diteC 61) , :' Mr. IJYTTLETota.tholight the malignity tit 114 paragraldCWas apparent. He for his own p." c had no.doubt that itatl-been'conceived •in In such a cas l the Elc,itse was liothild to interfere. • The.SPEA - KEroltserved, 'it was usual for th e warrants of 00(40Ilse to be directed by moue. They wovld see what , would be the situation cif e ft oflirer of that House, if he were directed-ouly.br the de . sCriptiOti of the party tii'dered to attend.! * If any-Member knew the-,,ante o-f.the.Editor, 4l)4. House infOrdr.tion front one of its ..Meinberi,' and the *at t eittiou re ot rho hoi v idttni could be ordered. If the.. o^tlir,ary course we r° !talien, he ..thonettl the ,11-onse., would order 1 115 'Pi inter or Pt; blis•her to iitilLid,lo' Order to tiPer' thin from. him. (if . n ere thought ;necessary.) tl' •° • tie;tiVe ibt • the 1e. , 0 • ;Ur, WYNN thought the PubliAterflugut to Procred to attcruVt . liewas t-ITV per;ion whose nate was 6rflered by litw to be printed -in the pape r , and tlferefote his atrendance. should first r e They cool I 'then inquire the name of t If Editor, nod tko order for his attendance. an ardtr:vvere made 14.)r the attendance of- i ll : liame nut beiritt 'stated, such or de • ` vvtittiti he more in the shape of a general ‘wor tant tiny thing rise. Mr. LYTTLET;YN• was 1111derPtt7orl to ingthr the.-14.n. Member • Who had beenin cotuniuni.c i r' tioti . fe • wi;11 the Editor - coul&state.his.nante ? ihtmit mid, - the-Person spoken of had del seabed himself in..the pole that be .bid receive' •in!tcly as the Editor of l'he CASTLERVAGII'WaS of opinion that this.' '' a t . one of the grossest breaches of thor•privilege . .s tP e o culd be committed,. and he 11 ? nrignt th e flo'l u s e ought nut to separate-withoot tkciAring it tp such. Mr. C. W. WYNNE remarked, that the off-t=111; Yin; I 's, Ir, is j Lo , for the 01 Pone Pr `•p Alr LVer couri the 1 7hilt th e ( the it die Was and Of w of th titiii c \v ete fron t po% ttle! ) 11 Yat v r)t tion 1111 a Dal t ) 1 4(1 ttkr r It fi• 4 4 ,, t `i .44 1k6 * 4CI( t), r i G ~,, , Ft ~] ,~~ ir f F. C P k