The Sun. — London, England, 1819-11-08 00:00:00

- OF ST. DAVID. The Loyal and li)otiTt,; Address of the Inhabi •iaors' and Land•Otvirerrs of the Parish of St. David, in the Cof,nry'ot the City n t Exettr To His ltuell Hiztineis GEORGE AUGUSTUS FRE-' KRICK PRINCE of WALES, Regent of the United Kii.ploni. • _ " ,‘l4it plea , 3e your Royal Highness, " We, his Majesty's Loyal and Dutiful Sub - • :Itcts, the Inhabitants and Land 0,% tiers of the 'Parish (d in the County of the City, 'nt Exeter, beg leave to appro l ach your Royal 4igl,oe ss , at the present -eventful Period, when every indication. is pt esented. of a Systematic Plan ot Proceedings for subverting the existing Govern-, - "We feel it a duty .inwerative upon every Loyal Subject, publicly to avow his attachment :to the Constitution, tied tis abhorrence of the - numeroes concurrent attempts which are made to oketthrow U. We have particularly contemplat cl, 'with the deepest concern, the erroneous %iews whiCh• have been so extensively .cuter wined re specting the Causes which hate occasioned t h e (H s : tiesses of the matmfecturing,•classes of the Corn.. tenuity, persuaded that they are prineipally to lie traced to the transi ion from a state of war to ILA( of peac e , at, el the conseque n t numeric a l tang , . • mentation of labourers arid artificers at home, to gether with a restval of commerce and manufac tures iu other count riesethecompetition of foreign I . Par kvIS, 'alit! the increase of shipping in. distant parts of &italic. " ‘Ve regret the mistaken. ideas which arc so sedelovsly inculcated respecting alleged expe (fleecy of expunging the National Debt, in the fallacious hope of improving the condition of the Pont ; coevinetd, in the first place, that were so flagrant a breach of public justice and of National -Faith _to be committed, not the. smallesi Luau ciahld ever be obtained on the gletvest emergency; rind cquelly convinced, in the next place, that the execution _of the specious project would defeat its alleged object, inasmuch as the extinction of fund ed property would pt eclude the most powerful encouragement to ,individuals- to accumulate a cripit 31, to be subsequently entharlsed in a manu titctaring establishment, through which employ ment and maintenance are p , ovided.for the Poor. We are sati:fied that the labouring classes will derive the most serious injury, instead of benefit, from being . convened by aspiring time gi?gttes to political meetings, partly from' being drawn Off from their holiest ocenpations, and by their acquit ing habi ts of idleness, p ar tly by b e i ng deluded by misryikresentation, excited to insubor dination and primed for insurrection, but prinei pu'lly by .their imbibieg seditious. principles, vvhicli, without receiving some effectual check, c a n only lead to o v er t ac t s o f Treason, Rebellion, and Civil War. " We perceive, with the sincerest sorrow, the adpptioti of the very same means in this Country, as Were resorted to in France, Germany, and other Seltes„ for accomplishing the overthrow of their respective Governments ; the dissemination of infidel and blasphemous publications, with a view to _remove ray check horn the operation of reli gions incieles, to. the successful termination of eeilitions and traitorous designs, subversive of the hest interests of civilized society. . We strongly teprobate the fallacious system seggested for the pretended improvement of the Legtslature, by giving to tee democratic branch of it aae overwhelming preponderance in the balance of rite Constitution. We couceive that the sub jection of the representative part of the : Senate to the. uncee.siug iefluence of popular caprice, and th e, e.t e b e lefoy of a continual change of its Mem bers from the natural result of Annual Parliaments, would preclude the possibi!ify of perseverance in the best concerted system of political measures. That. the proposition of Universal Suffrage would he Nquailyinjorioue to : individuals and to the pub lic at large, it being preposterous to expect that persams in a dependant situation of life would be generally actuated by•indepentient motives in the election of,Representatiees—aud it Wing fre quently experienced that .the exercise of the pri. vilege of Suffrage, instead of being advantageous, is highly detrimental to the, private interests of persons of this class of the.comnannity. ", have.observed, with concern, not only the contempt .vvith which the Legislature has of late'heeh treated, but likewise the obloquy which loss :been cast upon the Executive Branch of the Government. We particularly disapprove of con demeitig, unheard, any body of Magistrates, whtve gond - tut has not yet been subjected to legal inve?tigation. _ . " Folly sensible of the advantages which have been aojoyesl by ourselves, and by our forefathers, 'mar the present excellent Constitution, in the security of our persons ►,utl property, the equal adminicration.ot justice, anti protection from the assai►lts of both foreign•and domestic enemies, we pledge ourselves to strenw hen the hands of Go- yenta - rent when the Constitution is endangered by facti . pn and insurrection, and when politicaille volution assumes tke cloak of Radical Reform. NVe avow trur strongest attachment .to his IVlait4(Y's PersOn and Goternment, and to your Royal High ness,. and our .firm 'determination •to support the Constitured Authorities in. the execiition of the laws; and we are resolved persouiiily to discoun oteriavce, to tire utmost of our power, the propa gation of blasphemy, infidelity, and sedition, from. the fullest. persuasion that such principles are equaily destructive to the present ant to the3,.forture b tpp i licas of rust hiod, - and merit the reprobation of every honest and well , disnosed Sigurd by SAMULL KINGDON, Chairthan. RALYff BARNES, Vicar. - EPWJN E,ASTCOTT, Curate. - JONAS DENNIS, Impropriate Rector . And buttifie-trs of the liihabitants in general. „. ) :sincular cirloninstance . , necurred during the fire at•White4ltippol on Sunday sennight. A young Essex farmer; ; arrived the preceding- (lay at a friend's; h cee ,oppo,ite (being his first visit to L - ondon)td.wlio ha:; a peculiar dread- of a London fire. awoke from a sound sleep by 'the cry of ” Fire"! tire ! save tire children !" He, in his alarm, itippasing. the honse was• in to be on fire, -rushed into the adj , iitsilig' room, where lie fancied dria friend's children 'night be, seized on the first person Ire suet witn, vdticli happened to be the maid-servant; and- actually' hurried her into the street before he came to bit rccollectipb. LA W INIELLIprx.cr. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov. G. This being the first day of Michaelmas Term, all the Judges, except Mr. Justice break fasted With the Lord Chancellor. The Learn ed Judge last mentioned sot at ten o'clock to take bail in the Duchy Court. About one o'clock the Lord Chancellor and the cnher Judges came down in state to Westminster Hall, anti took their-seats in their Courts respectively. CRIMINAL INFORMATION AGAINST MIL AND MRS. CARLILE. Mr. GURNEY, on being called, on in turn, rose and movel for leave to file. a Criminal Informa tion against Richard Carlile, anti Charlotte, his Wife, for the publication of a blasphemous libel. He reminded the Court that Richard Curlile was tried at the late Sittings at Guildhall for the pub lication of two hi A'S pheinnits lihels, of which be was convirted. The first was a book called " The Ageollteasou, in three parts." In : the course of his defence he .read, as part of the defence, the whole of that book, !riots only of which had been selected for prosecution. This course of roceed ing had - been . adopted for ‘ the purpose of pro ducing by such means a more extended pahlica tion of the hot!ible contents of the work; for be (\lr. G ) had an affidavit, which stated that some time since Mr. Carlile had pub lisited an advertisement, ancouneiog that " The 'Mock Trial (for so he had 'ladled the ad ,linistra tion.of public justice) of Mr. Carlileavill be piib lislied in sheets, at two-pence 'each ;" and added., that in Si) many sheets the report of the four days trial would be completed, 'and concluded with anootincing*, that " the first sheet is now ready for delivery. The publication will proceed till it is vofliple.ted." From t h is it appeared, that the ueork"was coming out, sheet by' sheet", at thr Trice of' two-pence. The effidavii hinther stated, -that Mr. Carthe - being in custody in con• sequence of the 'conviction ',!ready mentioned, Mrs. Carlile, his wile, was persOnally earl yiN; on . the business of his 'shop, and was selling, with her own hands, tbvse portion's of her hu.band'a trial. NOw, if this mode of proceeding suceeed ed, it would he a complete receipt for the most extensive publicatious of the trials the eheap est possible way,' and thits the blasplienitius book wiiidt was the subject •cf prosecutiort wo,ld find its way to the public, in a channel infinitely more mischievous,' because capable of wider cir culation,-than it was - before. The Leal ned-Coun sel said he had EVe nornbers of the trial, the last three of which contirined the whole of the first part of The Age' of Reason ; and thus, for the }nice of sixpence, the were supplied with the poisonous matter it contained. The mode of publication by sheets evidently shewed that the object of the party was to send forth the of 1 which he hail "been convicted, in a more 'saleable shape by reason ofits,che'apness, and at the saute time of repeating the . dangerouS 14tt eee he had committed. By assuming Ibis' shape it Was mote within 'the reach of those who were most likely to be affected by its profligate tendency, than in that in which it was originally published.. Tr,e . information upon which the publisher had beeo convicted, set forth only certain passages of the blasphem , )us book, although almost every page of it might have formed the subject of an infor mation. He (Mr. G.) need not remind the Lurid Chief Justice, that Yery many other passages might -have been inserted io the iolormation than I those which were set forrh,and which had only been selected by way of sample; but his Lordship and the Jury were compelled to endure the painful and dis gusting task of sitting nine hours, which were em ployed 'by the defendant in the recital of the, whole work. He (Mr. G.) hopt'd it would not he requisite for hint to state an y thi ng i n recom mendation, or in support of his present motion ; still less to offer any argument upon the question, whether the libel thus republished 'by these per- Sons was of a perniCiorts and blasphemous ten dency. • . fle submitted to the Court, that it was impos s il i f e these persons, under pretence of pub lishing the trial, could heat liberty to give a %% bier circulation to those libels which were the stibl;ct _of the trial. If this were permitted, it would open the drior to the grossest abases. 111 the case of ' an obscene publication, pasiagei only of which might 'l . 4` . selecte for prosecution, the publisher on his trial . itlight chose . to read the whole of it, and 'thus, under, pretence of aeleilding himself, adopt such a Mode *if republishing the whole work under another ft - ,rm, and thereby aggravate the mischief for which he was called upon to ao silver. In the present case, passages only had been selected for prusecutiOn; but. the defendant had thought . proper to read the whole of the work in his defence, for the purpose of affording bins sell' the opPortwaily of republishing It it) anew Shape. This could not be endureq, and no'rule of law could sanction _the proceeding. Judges had repeatedly inlimated that such a republication was unlawful, and was the subject of criminal' prosecution. This had been sti declared in the case of the King v. IVilliams, who was convicted of publishing this very libel.. Air. Justice BAYLEY—I believe the Judges in titivated the sante opinion in the case of the King v. Creevey. , GLTUNEY laid, that was a very diffcrent case from the present. It had been frequently de clared incidentally by different Judges, that this Was an offence punishable criminally. Expres sions of this kind had rePeatedly fallen frouCthe Cutirt,,Nithin his (Mr. Gut ney's) : own knowledge and experience. On mor e occas i ons t h an one Lord Lilenborough bad so expressed himself, and so bad the present Chief Justice. Lord Ellenbo: totigh, had •aid, that it would be a great abuse of the privilege allowed to a defendant, if he ►+•ere at . liberty to repuhlili the libel which he bead been permit'ed to read in his defence. Jas: ice BAYLEy—Courts of Ju,tice are often obliged to hear publications, as matter of evidence, in the atlioinistratioti• of justice, which it would be extremely improper to re-pubJisb in a priitted tot in. , Mr. GUONEY—Your Lordships are often con demned in Court to hear the tuo►st paitnful and dis gusting pnblicaiions• This' fumy .be necessary for the pui poses of jtj,i ice, but it cannot be necessary (I,kt H ratan shrill do ;leis; for tile Inirpose of after wards sbcet by sheet, the libellous work -for which he is .prnseeutel, under the 'Pre 'ience of calling it.a report of his trial. Such is 'the present case, and it is 'attendca with this ag gravating circumstance, that 'being pithrished itt unnibers, the public_ may buy the iibeihnis work without the trial. That is the way in which this trial is published, I thought it necessary to pre sent- this motion to yore Lordships at the earliest possible period, in order, if possible, to check the publication of this trial ; which, if it is permitted to proceed, will defeat all the purposes of justice ; for by going on with this publication, whilst this Man is remaining in prison, his wife, who is`sell ing it, Will'render nugatory all the objects of the prosecution. 'The CHIEF JusTidB-;--You state that some of these nunihers were sold by the wife ? Mr. GuttNEv—All of them, my Lord. CHIEF JUSTICE—AII during the time the hus band was in piisnn ? Mr. GURNEY-74, so suggested to the Court.' • Mr. Justice .BaYLEY—Then what personal part in the transaction do you impute to . the husband ? Mr. GURNEY-1 do not impute 'any personal part in it to the husband; upon these affidavits ; but I submit to the Court, that the'eireitinstance of the . wile:being the person selling in the hus band's shop, that is prima focie evidence against the' husband, that the sale plaCe tilfh his knowledge and privity. It is stifii4.:lenr, a t' least, to call upon the husband t o answer this applica= i\Jr. JUSTICE BEST—You hare no evidence that the husband wiis persund;) , connected wit i•the sale. Mr. Justi c e BAYLEY-,-Yon have laid sitlficient ground 1.. r the' motion agiiinst. ibe wife, but nit "against the husband. This leing a misdeineanour, it will Dar t lie in the wife's muuth _1() say that she is acting under the intim nee of htr busband, There 'is that distinction between a case detheationr and a ease of felony. The eviilknCe you have against the wile !nay he sufficient against her in a misdemeanour, hut nut sufficient against the husband. In some cases of felony, the per sonal• presence of the husband may exempt the w if e from respon'sibility, but riot so here, nor in' Cases of murder, nor in case of keeping a dis ord,rly lionse, for which the husband maylnot be answerible with the wire. The tetiF.V JUSTICE—The ordinary course ap plications of this kind, in founding a motion for a criminal information, is to show that the party proceeded against has personally. acted in the Of fence brought before the Court. 'lt 'nnist be shewn that the party to..ivhoin /the mo'ion ap• plied has personally acted., I don't find that your. affidavits bring none that proof to Richtud'ar lile; for I understand you to state, that at Ike time of this.publication be was not at - home, but a prisoner. i • • . . . Mr. GURNEY —The p}aceOf . .Publication is his house. The CHIEF Jusric—That may ht ; but in a man's absence many things may take place in his shop without his knowledge. Mr. GUENEY-The is carried on for his benefit, and his Warne is over the door. Mr. Justice BEST,—ThM may t;e, but hemay not know what is doing in his house. If- he is answerable for tr.7!at is (lone, n his absence, be may have no means of defence. Mr. GUENEY--1 submit, that inasmuch as his name is over the door, the . business being carried on in his name rn his house, that is prima facie evidence to call upon .;,.21 to answer this•rule. There have been cases where a person in circum stanced has been called upon to spew whc.ther or tint the publication has taken place. with his know: ledge. I submit there is sufficient in this case In 'call upon Mr. Carlile to shew whether it has or has nut been dime with his consent. This he - may' do _afterwards is hen the rule is granted. The CHILE Jus•rtetc—you must shew 'bat the' libel has been printed and published by. Richard- . . ~ Mr. Justice BAYLEY—Does 'your Ai davit state !liar the'republicatiun has taken place untie,. his direction i , . Tin: CLIIEF JUSTICIt— 01 tllt it is sold for his. benefit ? . . , . .. Mr. (int(Nev—lf a person announces in a let ter that intends suet' a pliblicwion, and it at: tertVards toles plaice in his Skop, thati. ? t'cison able proof 'that it is done by iiiS•directi,,ns, and for his benefit. We have .Mr: Carldes letter io that effect. Mr. justice 13AvLeit—There if a . va st deal of difference between what iS conducted in a shop to which a man has access, and that which is done at a time when he is prevented access by le . gal prisonment. Mr. Justice Hot.floYD—This is not the case of -a publicatio►► prior to imprisonment, wl►en the party may be supposed to have access to his shop; but it is a publication at 'a time when he is wholly debarred access by imprisonment. • Tbe Cuter JosTice-1 think you can take'the rule against the wife only. Mr. GURNEY boring sat d►►wn, rose again, and suggested that the libel had the name ot-Rich,rd Carlile to it, which he egutended was sudieieri; evidence to shew that lie was the printer. • The Cutlet.' JusTtcE—That may be, but his name may he used without his consent or know. . I ledge. Itns s not the ordinary case, where a person has access to a shop where ins business is carried on. This is the case of a p•rson who nas ;no Access to his shop at the time of publication. Rule to shew cause refused u, , ainst Car• lile, but granted against his wife. ELECTION OF SIR C, IVOLSELEY. '[he Judges ha%iog risen to depart, and three of them - having: let ( the Court, Alajor Cattv%right, who had been tittibg in ,the Jary Box the whole of the day, caught the atteution of Mr. Justice Mr: Justice ottidervaod, Sr,_; y ou appear Mere to plead to 'an inictment: . . _ . fti , ..jur.Cart%vright—Yes, 111 y Lord. Mr, Ju;ticellayley—The proper course .vill be tohave !he indictment read. 1)o you wi s h t o h ave it read ? . _ . Mdjor Cartwright--If y.our Lordship pleace , l. Mr. Dealtry, the Clerk ot the Clow', O;-tie, proceeded to read the indictment pteteried r!Lt the lkoit IVartvickshire Assizes against Geo. Ed m „,,,i s , Chas. Maddocks, JOhn Carttvtight, Thomas Jo• nathan Wooter, and Wm. Griftti Lewis," far 110 a ing maliciously and unlawfully cotispircd togeth;;; . r , with other s , w h ose names are un k nown , I- July. last „ Birmingham, 1 . 0 nwpihinte, eject, 31►t .1 e appoint a M e mb er to serge i n t h e L uminous Ho"' of Parliament, without beim duly authorized 5d to do t '. The indictment, which was of cousider4 able length, having been brdught tO a conClUsiono Mr. Dealt' y addressed the Major,. Who stood " °i ~ the floor the whole time,. and said,.‘‘ How la, you Are you Guilty or Wo't Guilty ?" - Major Cartwright—Nut guilty. The Major then quitted the Court. IsIR. HUNT. Mr.'Hunt now rose, and addressing Mr. Justice Bayley as he ...was quitting the Court, said, ikit Lord, wish to ask 'you a question. Mr. Justice Bayley—No, I cannot hear yo , My business req , ites that I should .be in anoth er place. Mr. Hunt--4 hove been waiting here all day Mr. Justice Bayley then left the Csnat. Mr. Hunt was accompanied by Mr. :.iootho'" e i of M4nchester celebrity. Mr. lint4lit, ulso Manchester; was in Court. From the LONDON GAZILTI'E . of 4 ,Vov. 6. FrA;teha Nov. S. His Royal . fr - fighs : rhe•Prince Regent Itql !Yen pleast , a; in 'the name and on the belnilf of his AL: 0 ; jesty, to constitute and appoint George Earl of EL , ,Lemont, to be his Majesty's Liewenant to t Custos Itotuloruni of the County of S'ust , ex. His Royal Highness the Prince Regent Oas sts ° , bfeptlyased, in the name an d on the behalf . His Majestif, to constitute and appoint Fleur,' Lisceiks, jscl., comm(Mly c.dle4.i Viscooot Mies, to be. His Majesty's Lieutenant and ligHort!in o - the Wes! noting' of 4,be York, and of the City of Yolk anti Cottoty of 11 '` same City. Foreign Office ) Nov. 0. The Prince Regent has appointed John Card wright, Lsq , to be his Maje-s!r's Cons,,l Gene" in the'Dom S . inion of the Ottoman Porte; all' , James Yeames, F.€q. to be his ANesty's Cousu;' Genero in the Russian ports on the Black. Sea. BANKRt7PT6Y FNLARGED W. and J. Devey, Cual-exChange, coal-factors, froniN to Nov. -• • , . • BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. F. D. Astley, Dukinfield-lodge, Cheshire, dealer. BANKRUPTS. J. Barlow, Manchester, innkeeper, to surrender Nor. 21, / Dec. 18, at the Dog-tavern, Moachester, Solicitors, Mess , " Witidle, - Perkins, and Frampton, Gray's inn. • J. B. Sharp, Queen-street, Che'apside, w a rehouseman, 23, 27, Dec. IS, at Guildhall. Solicitors, Messrs. courteer, and Rubinson, %Vaibrook, C. Brown, Birsiiitigharn, cabinet-soaker, Nor. lb, 20, Dee- 1 ! # • at the Royal Hotel, Birmingitun, Solicitor, Mr. Soli"' AldermatiburY-postern. G. Greenwood, Hallway-street, Oxford-street, jeweller, Z'`,'" 16, 27, I)ec. 18, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Poole, Adoal court, Old Broad-street. J. L. Cope, Kingston -upon-Hull, merchant, Nov. 16, 23, Ml' 18, at Guildhall. Solicitors, i‘lessts. Hall, Russ, 3 " . i3rowilley, New Boswell -court. • • • I. Isaacs, Newington, chi n:noon , N 0v .16 , 23, D ec. 18, at Gilt • hall. Solicitor, Mr. Tucker, Barilett's-hoildincs. J. Nowell, Ugh-town, card-maker, Nov. Dec, IS, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Robeits, Gr •. Helen's, Ilishopsgate. . . C. Callanan and J. Connor, Lime-street, soap-makers, l a , 27, Dec. IS, at Guildhall, -S o licit or . - • Mr. Youtlrrw John-street, Alinories. C. Liao, jun. Minories, Nov: 13, 90, Dec; IS; at Guildhall' • Solicitors, :Messrs. Amory and Coles, Lotlihury. • - It. Forster, Old Broad-street, Merchant, Nor. 3, 20, we , lay ot Solicitors, Messrs. Alliston and 1111 , .. 1 lc" ° FrCtituan's-court, Curtihill." st L. Lyon., Lower Sbadwell, brew er ,. N ov . 1 3 , 20, D,c. Gtiildhail. Solicitors, Messrs. Pownall and Fail thoroo Old Jewry. T:Welsster, Chedzrave, Norfolk, printer, Nov. .29, 3 0 1 D eC. I at the.Ttins 13uligay, Suffolk. Solicitors, M' try Clarke, •Richards,. a id Nledcalf, Chancery-101.e. W. Button, Marlhoroinih, builder, N..v. 17, Dec. 13. • the Guildhall, Marlborough. Solicitor, Sir. Eye, I lin:square. D. Garrott, Portsca, cabinet-maker, Nov. 24, e 5, Des..-. 1,, ` O ,, the Star-inn, Gus-port. Solicitor, Mr. B ogue ,G rea t J3'n e • street, Bedford-rnw. 8..1. T, nen t and W. Garnett, Liverptiol, uvi-Hiants, 25, 2(1, Dec. 13, at the office_ of Mr. Avis.,-,, L e er: ,o9 Solicitor, Mr. Wheeler, Castk,o-sti•ect, HoPooi G. A. Edmonds, Dudley, Woreost - ci shops --per, •* 21, .23, Dec. 18, at toe -George-inn; Mancheste,r, , tom tots, Messrs. Aliltie and Parry. Temple. • J. Davey, John:Stre e t, Wi s t Smithfield, carpenter. Nov ' l3 . , 20, Dec. IS, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr..M•Dog,_ street, Iltilburn.' NI. Kelly, .Maricliestet,- cotton-broker, Nov. 22, 23, pee' .5. at the Garrick's-Head, Manch e ster. Solicitors, 51`'" ;- Longdill and Butterfield, Gray's-inn. • E. Carter, Bristol. elieeie-fitetur, Nov. 15., t 6, Dec. IS , at the . White Lion 11111, Bristol. Solicitors, Messrs. Jelikil," James, and Anhoit, New Inn. J. WelliiiL;ton, jun.' Chat ii, Soutersetshire, grocer, Dec Is, at the Angel,-Itin, Chard. Solicitor, Mr. Warr)", " W. and W. Button, Paternoster-row, booksellers, Nov. 25, Dcc. 18, at Guildhall. Solicitors, Messrs. Hutchi o9j tl and 1 - !ophitison, Lincoln's Inn, New-square. W. Hughes:lml F. Todd, Great Winchester-street, tuercha-,tsf Nov. ru, - 20, Dec. 18, at Gitildb4ll. - Solicitor, Mr. peer, Broad-street.. • t . a Tot. Oxford-street, hosier, N o v. 13, 20, Dec. s , Guildhall. • Solicitors, Messrs. Courteen and Ronius.P'' %Valhi ook. E. Tairlier,St. - Thnistan's-Ilii!,. 'merchant, Nov. 16, 20, 1-/ec. IS - , at GUildlialL Solicitor, Air. Spence, Starie-iiiti. t ea J. Fisher,. Bristol, - victualler, li, 16, Dee. IS, _Full Moon-inn, Bath. Solicitor, Mr. Llighmour, Scott yard. J,. Lytue, Symmotnily, Derbyshiro; cotton-spinite r, Nov. 24 k 1 - 3 .. Dec. 18, tot the 24..luarsler. Solicitor, kioson, Dec. F. H. Choppiii, Whetst o n e , horse-thealer, Nor. 13, 2 1 ', he r, is, at Guildhall. - Solicitors, Messrs. Rietiardsiin, Fi'•• and Lake, Bury-street, 2t. Jaloes'a. - • • •-- - - To f n tnv,lv.l • f e of On the 4th inst. Great Cbeyne•ruw, Ch.e!sca, W' •,01, Mr. WrOttmore, Charles-street, St. dantessquare, •it of a daughter, her wilt child. • EI). ' On the Gth inst. at St. Martin'Ls Church, Nlr.4 Th o mas 4- 1 fanne'r, 'of Kingston, to Ali,s F, i;h:street, • On the 30th ult. NI Ed pubson oi , 1131 " P, stead, to Maria, vontwest ditugh',er iituvlier °llgr Esq. of the flank of Ensiand. . .. DIVA): T ,„ tre ,. • • . Yesterday morning., at his..atiartenents in Di , " - ,' s , v , e y, Li ticol'n's-inn• fields, aft er a fr . ,. tLirs illiit , s, Mr. A M`'''' ' fle many years Printer of the Courier Newspaper. aged s ti a titi‘ was a ::,711 2 of peat ~..,n th, pf a most frie n dly and to3c"- by( ilispo.iiti,n, awl his loSs is iiktuili anil sinc e r e ly regret ted ais liantierom: friends and acquaintance. - • • z , place' 0:1 Thinctlily. the 4th inst. at his hoilse, in , Cad o ; o l-' - ',tfice• afttra feW clays' illness , George - . Hicks, E.s . Thof the Navv"" , , •. '___„,...20 zaudaaarmatem.....• avaescamorsorrs7.7.morma....., LONDON: Printed by J. B. CA 01 No. s 9, st y, 3 , O nmo,i-street, Queen-s.litare;. and published 1)1' sol SClti PPS, of No. 7 7 South M o lt on - street , at T 5 ,-, g , 4 erot (Mice, No. 11% strand ; where AdrettiselnenMs Letters, &c. Cpbst-paid) must be ai4lressed. I , (:( LAS Pr ro et th t 1115. ft the ( P&L, pr; C hur, ............