The Sun. — London, England, 1841-04-19 00:00:00

RN ING EDITION SPIRIT of the PUBLIC JOURN FROM THE DAILY PAPERS OF SATURDAY. ( From the Morning Chronicle.) We regret to perceive by an account from Canterbury, in another column, that four officers of the 13th and 14th Light Dragoons, at present stationed at Canterbury, are implicated in proceedings which may ultimately prove very inju r i ous t o them. They are described as Captain Byng Doherty, Cap tain John Allgood, Captain . Edmund Doherty, and Captai n John Goddard. Captain is a title often given by courtesy to subaltern officers, and we presume that, in the cast of at least two of these officers, the title has been erroneously given. On looking into the new Annual Army List for 1841, published by Mr. Murray, we find a Henry Edward Doherty, and Charles Edmund Do herty, Captains of the 14th, but the only Goddard is a John Hesketh Goddard, a Cornet by purchase n the 14th, on the 26th July. 1839 ; and the only Allgood, a Lancelot J. H. Allgood, Cornet by purchase in the 13th, on the 22d May, 1840. Th ey are a ll, no d ou bt, y o ung men, particularly the two cornets. The necessity for the interfe rence of the police at first does not appear to be very clearly made out, for the officers are not described as having acme any mischief, either to person or property, but to have been merely a little noisy, which in young men returning from dinner at midnight is natural enough. But the worst part of the busi ness was the language held by one of the officers, Cornet All good, to two privates of the 13th—" Go down to the Prince of Orange, and tell your comrades that their officers are taken to the station shouse." The message was not de livered in vain. A body of soldiers released the officers from the station-house by force, breaking in the doors, and using violence to the police. This was a serious con clusion, as the young men will experience to their cost, for they are held to bail to the sessions, and it is not likely that the mil.tary authorities will overlook an offence which strikes at the root of all discipline. How can these officers maintain their authority over soldiers whom they have invited to violate the laws on their account? We confess we are sorry for these young men who, step by step, have been led to acts of culpable indiscretion, which must prove ultimately most ruinous to them. The only thing that can be said for them is, that the officer who sent for the soldiers must be a mere boy, and it is difficult to put an old head on a young pair of shoulders. ( From the Morning Herald.) The history and mystery of Puseyism is thus satisfactorily traced to the logical influenza which has so long pervaded the schools and quadrangles of Oxford. It never can now become an epidemic at Cambridge, for they are there secured from it by the opposite study of the mathematics. But in days of yore, when the school logic, was taught on the banks of the Cam, and when the disciples of Aristotle and llamus divided that learned university, the Popish tendencies of many of the college tutors is still a matter of record in the annals of lite rature. The only logle worthy of cultivation is that large, comprehensive, and inductive reasoning—the business of human life—the bustle and activity of social, civil, and po litical employments. This is the healthy food of the in tellect. The real sources of argument are to be found, not in Aristotle's Topics, but in the daily exercise of the faculties on human affairs ; and the best method to detect sophistry is to bid defilnce to the authority of fathers and schoolmen, and to maintain the free, independent, and searching spirit of the Protestant reformation. Nor is the example of Pascal as a Papist to he adduced as any exception to this argument. In his Provincial Letters" he reasons with all the wit and free dom of a Protestant. He was born a mathematician, and he always derided the technical methods of the schoolmen. These letters should now be republished and adapted to the exigencies of the present age. How many striking examples might be taken from the " Tracts for the Times," and from the wri tings of our living Puseyites, to be shown up by his inimitable satire ! (From the Times.) It would b 3 affectation in us to deny that we look forward to the impending contest for Nottingham with the deepest inte rest. It has happened, by a dispensation which we cannot re gird as otherwise thin providential, that at this critical season, when the Poor-law is actually upon its trial in Parliament, and dining that short interval of breathing time which Minis ters have allowed to the country before resuming the dis cussion already commenced, a vacancy has occurred in the representation of that very town which, above All others, the friends of the poor would have chosen as the most appropriate battle-field upon which to test the pl.. pular feeling. The friends of the pour in Nottingham have seized the opportunity, and have sent a revisition to the man whom even his adversaries must allow to be cite fittest champion of the cause,—a man whose whole public life has been devoted to the interests of the poor—who, in Parliament and out of Parliament has temperately. reso lively. and without resp ect of p ersons or p arties, stood forward tie oppose the Poor-law Amendment Act, and shown himself i -early to sacrifice ambition, influence, self-interest, and class pop7ilarity. rather than make any compromise upon this cardinal point. We speak not of Mr. Wa'ter's personal character, abilit i es, a attainments—upon these subjects others may speak with greater p 'op' lety, because, perhaps with more impartiality, than ourselves. ..'hut we claim for him the praise of being pre eminently the friend „! the poor, the persevering advocate of and indefatigable foe of the So their rights, the undauntet! merset-house despotism; and we feel that this assertion can hot be gainsald, except by those who, while they mu-t in their "marts acknowledge the benevolence of Mr. Walter's intentions, dispute the s)undness of his judgment. (From the Globe.) The impending Parliamentary contest at Notting. ham exhibit; the utter destitution of principle by which Toryism is distinguished, in a light too powerful to be mistaken ; it will not fail to bring to the recollection of our readers certain facts on which we have rested impu tations upon the party, which their organs have repelled as false and calumnious, but which this and other recent demonstrations have made too plain to be successfully de nied. To illustrate our meaning, it is only necessary to alluiae to the fearful state of society which the malts fiseturine districts exhibited some eighteen months since. The Chartists had covered the country with a web-work of affiliated societies. Their national pe tition was collecting signatures from the hill-sides and cottages of our rural counties, as well as from the ' looms, forges, and manufactories, of hives of hu man beings at Manchester, Glasgow, Newcastle, j3olton, Wolverhampton, Oldham, and Ashton-un der-Lyne. Birmingham was the capital of Feargus O'Connor, end was well nigh sacrificed by fire to the desire for plunder which pervaded his adherents. Newport, situated the centre of extensive collieries, was attacked by thousands of deluded men, many of whom ivere armed, anti was only preserve-. 1 from devastation, possibly from destrucijon, by the praise worthy promptitude of the Magistrates, supported by the valour of a mere handful of troops, who re pelled the insurgents, and preserved the torn and its peaceful inhabitants from the brutality of an tefuriated mob. We stated at the times and confirmed the truth of our representations by appealing to facts too notorious to be denied, and too unmistakeable to be misconstrued, that the Tories were the originators and abettors of the fearful agitation which led to these results. The Chartists were employed by Tory agents its instruments, eminently fitted by blind rage to ef fect their party objects. For this purpose the Tories turned the new Poor-law into a battery of assault against Government, although Sir Robert Peel and the Duke of NVellington, and indeed the principal '-Tory members in both Houses of Parliament, lent their aid to pass, defend, and administer that mea sure. Wherever an outcry against the very measure which was alike the production of the Tories and Whigs :in Parliament, could be employed to seat a Conservative e a eldidate, the Tories, with an inconsistertey and hypo erissi truly disgusting, clipped their glowing palate, cheesed on to their task certain agents of sedition—who would have heed hanged had the Home Department been conducted as it was in the golden days of esta blished espionage—aol voted even a combination with the most furious Radireels as a justifiable assoeiatior. because an expedient. policy, It is now ascertained be- Tond doubt that Frost was in ~'he confidence of the Tory candidate's Committee, and acteL,' as their agent to ob tain votes for him at Monmouth a t the last election ; while at Huddersfield the Tories vo!'ed for Oastler, ,while the 7'inies and other Tory journals, with a redi pe ecity truly charecteristie, first supplied hint with the material for his harangues, and then reported theol, in a complimentary styl-, in their columns. (From the Standard.) It is dangermis to follow words in an undefined ia- Itcrpretation through a course of reesonine Of this whichwe have an exampl e i n t h e censure, o f . some good men are the objects, with reference e to the Netv• ' Poor-law ; and as we ourselves, r haps, are not with out biome in the particular injustice, l it becomes us Some to do our best to remedy it. persons of un _questioned sense and benevolence h ave spo k en o f t h e new l a w as " an experiment , " which it is innocent and politic to p ut in course of trial.. Now, it has - been hastily concluder!, by ourselves, among others, that this recommendation of the experiment was accom panied by a conseiou.cess that the operation of the law would be as cruel as it has proved, and as we from the first anticipated, that it must prove ; b ut t hi s siste is unjust. It is more candid, an d more w2sat we know of the character of the perso con ns o f nt with whom we s neak, to suppose that they were mistaken in the m ediat:eeffcct of the law, than to believe that they contem plated the certainty of its cruelties, and have miscalcu lated merely the effect of cruelty. In other words, we owe it to the parties to assume that the experiment which they recommended regarded the harshness or abe mildness in operation of certain specified provisions not the probable effect of a harsh treatment of the poor, with respect to which they had no doubt. It must always be a question of great delicacy whether a measure of doubtful operation as regards the happiness of eves one of our innocent fellow. creatures shall be put upon trial ; but that a me isure which shall with certainty injuriously affect even one ainnocent person must not be tried, can be no question 141 to a Christian man. The Whig-Radical Arch- Liehop of Dublin has, we know, published a pamphlet recommending the capital execution, in certain cases, of uo. ersti , eseioas infants and of insane persons, that is, tv rrespon d sibl T , and therefore innorent personv, GI moral. ; but this, besides its folly as a po for the put. goo. litical doetrint; Js not the doctrine of Christianity. The religion of . 4 1 6 ,, tirosPel , no less wise than benign, directs itself to the " v s of m en w i t h a peremptory . ex and love mercy," teaching command to " tlo jus temporary, o r rather t: an that the lowest degree that whatever may be the :ur . ts to result in eve, sight, advantages purchased ,b,ry: of it or cruelty, they though we look merely to human efiesets• (From the Couri er. ) By all friends of the poor, and honest haters of tha new law framed for their oppression, if not extirpa. ,tion, the candidateship of Mr. Walter for the repre. •Isentation of Nottingham, now vacant through the death .of Sir Ronald Ferguson, will be hailed with sincere gratification, and his prospects watched over with the deepest interest. We learn, indeed, with no common feelings of satisfaction, that those prospects are as pro mising as his friends could wish, and that in due season tven'Y expect t o see t h e h ono urable gentleman and Chri shin philanthropist restored to that place in Par . Ilan - lent which h e fill e d so h onoura bl y before, and to that service is the cause of humanity and his coun• try, the duties of which he formerly discharged with a zeal and ability only exceeded by his honesty and dis interestedness. The people of Nottingham will not forget that in that Commons' House, to which now they will scarcely fail to return him, be ever stood almost alone and unaided the most intrepid advocate of the rights of the people, and emphatically and abovo all the poor man's friend, and never more conspicuously was the steadfastness of principle and resolution unflinching of a public man tried by so severe a test on any great question, as in the case of Mr. Walter, then Member for Berkshire, during the proceedings of that unfair and one-sided Committee of Inquiry into the operation of the new Poor-laws, of which that thoroughgoing Whig partisan, Mr. Fazakerley, was Chairman. With the history of that Committee, and the grossly partial conduct of him who presided over as of those who assisted at it, the public cannot fail to be familiar, as well as with what courageous perseverance Mr. Walter followed out and established his case of gross oppression of the poor against the despots of Somerset House, amidst and in despite of invective and calumny around and about him, the disgusting prevarications of Assist ant-Commissioners, the shabby trickery of the penny-a lining new Poor-law Secretary, the scandalous brow beating of the poor men his witnesses in a style that would have disgraced the floor of the OA Bailey, aid finally the disreputable one-sidedness of the tribunal dis honestly packed to receive and report upon evidence. -- - MONEY MARKET and CITY NEWS. (FROM THE MORNING PAPERS OF lIATURDA Y. ) CHRONICLE.—The Funds have not improved to-day, although the proceedings in the case of MtLfoi leave no doubt of a satisfactory termination—the case having been removed to the Court of the United States by certiorari, and a comtnis sion issued to take the evidence of Mr. Fox and the Hon. Daniel Webster. In the opinion of American gentlemen with whom we have conversed, these steps are considered to have been taken in order to pave the way for the discharge of the prisoner by legal process—it being quite plain that the only testimony which Mr. Webster or Mr. F o x can give about the affair is, that it is now adopted as a question to be decided be tween the two Governments, agreeably to the principles of the law of nations. It is most likely that Mr. MtLeod will ac cordingly be liberated so soon as the commission containing the evidence of Mr. Webster and Mr. Fox has been reported to the Court. At the date of the adviees, brought by the Caledonia steamer, the British Queen had not reached New York, having been obliged to put into Halifax, with damage. Owing, to her detention, it was not known that the bills drawn by the United States Bank on Messrs. Denison and Co. and Slorrison and Co., of London, had been honoured. The Money Market, however, had rallied a little, and stocks of all kinds were looking up. The last cash price for shares of the Bank of the United States at New York was 161 to 17. Exchange on London, 7 to 71. Mr. Hinchman's bill for legalizing the suspension of specie payments by the banks, and authorising an issue of small notes, had passed both Houses of the Legislature of Pennsylvania, but it was supposed by many that the Governor would inter pose his veto. 'the belief in Philadelphia, however, was, that he would rather allow the time allowed him of ten days to elapse without returning the bill, in which case it would become law, as silence in these points is held to be consent. Or, at least, that if he returned it with objections, they would not affect the vital parts of the measure, but only the details, so as to admit of the substitution of an amended measure, which would contain all that was required. The first measure which it is supposed would be considered by the special Session of Congress, is the tariff, in conjunction with the exhausted state of the federal treasury, and it is ex pected that. a duty will be imposed on tea and silk, and other articles of luxury, which are at present free. The currency also, and a national bank, with the distribution of the public 'awls, in connection with the subject of the necessity of local taxation by the States, will certainly occupy the early attention of the Harrison Administration, and he submitted by them for discussion in the special Session of Congress. TIMES.—In the English funds the business transacted was principally confined to sales, which, under the circum stances that stock was not so much in demand as yesterday, when the account was closing, and that the question between this country and America, by the deferring of M'Leod's trial, still appears open, caused some unsteadiness in prices. Hence the decline exhibited in the day's quotations. The New York papers contain a document of great im portance, which is the Bank Bill, passed by both houses of the Pennsylvanian Legislature, and presented on the 9th ult. to the governor. By this it is provided, that the banks of the commonweath are to be liable for the payment of their debts, as individuals are liable, and that the extraor dinary penalties shall be repealed. The banks are to have the privilege of issuing small notes to the amount of 15 per cent. on their capital stocks for a period of five years. The total amount of debts and liabilities. ex clusive of deposit, is not to exceed double the amount of capi - tal stock. The stocks held by the banks (excepting those of Pennsylvania) are not to exceed 10 per cent. of their capitals, but the case of investments already made is especially provided for, as with respect to these, none are to be reduced more rapidly than 121 per cent. every ninety days. No officer of a bank is to be permitted to loan its funds, persons eligible as Directors must own stock proportioned to the capital of the bank, and no one is to be Director of more than one bank at a time. With respect to dividends, no dividend at any time is to exceed 7 per cent., and the excess is to form a contingent fund, but during suspension a dividend of 5 per cent. is to be allowed. The Shareholders are authorised to reduce the capi tal to $14,000,000. This Bill, it is expected, the Governor will veto, and the privileges it accords to the insolvent banks seem to he most unreasonable. As for winding up their af fairs, the only measure to prevent further embarrassment, the banks, it is seen, have a renewed privilege of issuing small notes, the most objectionable form of a paper currency, for the long period of five years, so that their liabilities will be in a fair way of increasing rather than diminishing. The share holders of the Banks are still to be allowed a dividend during a period of suspension, that is, those who have embarked in a concern with all its risks, and who of all parties are least enti tled to preference, are to receive their income, while the in nocent noteholder is subject to constant depreciation of his property ; but at the same time it is impossible to tell from what source a dividend is to come while a Bank is in suspension. But perhaps discussion is wasted on a question to which, on the first view of the details, so many objections present them selves. The document is only worth adverting to as another form of banking in America. It may be interesting at this period to know the appropria tions made for this year for the public services of the United States. They are set forth in full detail in a Report by the clerk of the House of Representatives, which shows that the appropriations for the support of the Government is $3,517,079 ; for the army, $6,041,919; for the naval service, $5,926,337 ; for fortifications, $435,500 ; for the Military Academy, $`165,842; for the revolutionary and other pen sioners, $1,044,155 ; for the Indian Department, Treaties, &c., $1,000,963 ; and for private disbursements, $10,055 ; the total amount being $23,191,806. RIOT AT CANTERBURY BY MI LITARY OFFICERS, AND ATTACK UPON THE STATION-HOUSE. CANTERBURY, FRlDAY.—Yesterday Captain Byng Do herty, Captain John Allgood, Captain Edmund Doherty, and Captain John Goddard, of the 13th and 14th Light Dragoons, at present stationed at Canterbury, were brought before the Mayor and other Magistrates to answer the following charge : William Bradley, inspector of police, stated that shortly after twelve o'clock on the previous night, the defendants, with others not in custody, were rioting about the streets in a state of intoxication, and creating considerable disturbance. He went up and expostulated with them, and stated that if they did not pass on quietly he would be compelled to take them into custody. They promised they would do so, but in a few minutes they renewed the hallooing and shouting, upon which he approached them a second time, accompanied by other police officers, and being grossly abused by Captain Doherty, he took that gentleman into custody. Some of the other de fendants attempted a rescue, when he charged some bystanders to assist, and finally the whole of the defendants were con veyed to the station-house. A few minutes, however, had only elapsed when a body of soldiers, belonging to the 13th and 14th regiments came to the station-house, headed by two men dressed as officers servants, and one of them de clared that Captain Doherty was his master, and that :hey (the soldiers) were determined to have the officers out. They then endeavoured to force the doors of the station-house, but were resisted by witness and other policemen. In the skirmish that ensued the door in the passage which led to the place where the prisoners were confined was broken in by them, and he (Bradley) was seized by the throat, and dragged out ef the station into the street, and while there he saw several of the :oldies§ endeavour to force the iron bars which secured the windows, and by that means h o i l t s i t c a h in the adm i i , s a s t i l on oht t a o in t e h d e lockup. o They emplo7e a t i l l iZateri ar eei w to knock y him down with it if he purpose, and they fter i .. , some time the defendants were dared to interfere. t singly they raised a loud shout liberated, and as they came o. ‘serty's release he took off his of exultation. Upon Captain Do.. •a the window shutters cap and hallooed loudly, and at that tim, -of the windows of the station-house were driven in, and man, '-etween 30 shattered. The whole party, which consisted of and 40, then went down the street shouting and cheering. Capt. Doherty cross-examined the inspector at some length, but failed in shaking his evidence. The iron crow-bar used by the assailants was produced. Police-constable Milliner confirmed Bradley's statement, and added that, when the Inspector took Captain Doherty into custody, both Captains Allgood and Edmund Doherty at tempted to rescue the prisoner from what they called the b-- b— police men . Wit ness t oo k C ap t a i n Allgood to the sta tion-house, and on the way there he offered witness a croarn to let him go; and finding that theproposal was rejected, Cap tainrt All goo d sa id to two pro privates e of the 13th, wo were in the street, tt comrades C th o at do th v down to to n fathmers Prince are n ° to ran th ge' st andatio station-house." o y s o e u ., r , The witness then described th e a tt ac k u p on th e s t a ti on -h ous e by the soldiery. Fullager and Dodd, (two ' other policemen), gave similar tes timony. They were cross-examined at considerable length by the de fendants ; but the questions that were put to them went to show that the officers, upon th e i r liberation, exerted m th ai e nly selves in preve ntin g the men from com mitting further outrage, and also in indu cin g them to leave the station-house—twofLt; which were readily admitted by the police-officers. Captain Byng Doherty said he was very desirous that it might be fully unders tood b y the public that the so ldiers had not been brought from the barracks, as he had heard h a d b een reported. but were out on leave that night. The MAYOR said that it was so understood; and indeed it was shown by the evidence of the policemen. Mr. Clements, Superi ntendent of the police, deposed to the defendants being brought to the station-house, on a charge of drunk and disorderly, and likewise to the outrage being evidence. He com mittedby the soldiers, as described in the inspector's. He added, that he was induced to liberate the prisoners, fear ing that blood would be shed if he did not do so. He suc ceeded, however, in first exacting from them a pledge that, as gentlemen, they should give him their right names, and pro mise to appear in the morning to answer any charge that was preferred against them. The defendants called no witnesses to contradict the officers statements, and admitted that they were " rather noisy," but declared that they in no way encouraged the soldiers in the mischief they had committed ; nor had they ( the defendants') assaulted anybsdy, or damaged property of any kind. They severally expressed their regret for what had taken place, and said they were willing to pay any fine that the Bench might think proper to inflict on them. The Magistrates consulted together for some time, and The MAYOR informed the defendants that after carefully weighing the whole circumstances of the case, the Bench were unanimously of opinion that they would best discharge their duty to the public and to the parties concerned by send ing the case before a Jury. If the Magistrates could i have been satisfied that the ends of justice would be answered by dealing with the matter in a summary way, they 'would willingly have done so, but looking to the serious breach of the peace that had been committed, they could not adopt that course. The defendants were then bound over, themselves in 1001. and two suretiesof 1001., to appear at the Quarter Sessions and take their trial. H.l SUN, The Town-hail was densely c owded throughout the inves tigation, which lasted four hours. The officers of the 14th, by the Magistrates'. decision, have placed themielves in an awkward position, in consequence of their being under orders for India in It is rumoured that the matter will not drop here, but that it will be made the subject of a Court-martial. TREATY OF COMMEkCE AND NAVIGATON BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS AND GREAT BRITAIN. The republic of 'texas and her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, being equal ly desirous of affording every facility and encouragement to their respective citizens and subjects engag,d in com mercial intercourse with each other, have nominated as their Plenipotentiary to conclude a treaty for this purpose, that is to say, The Republic of Texas, Gen. James Hamilton, &c. And her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, the Right Hon. Henry John Vis count Palmerston, Baron Temple, a Peer of Ireland, a mem ber of her Britannic Majesty's most honourable Privy Council, a member of Parliament, knight grand cross of the most hon ourable order of the Bath, and her Britannic Majesty's prin cipal Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs. Who, after having communicated to each other their respec tive full powers, found in good arid clue form, have agreed u' on and concluded the folio ing articles:— Article 1. There shall be reciprocal liberty of commerce and navigation between and amongst the citizens of the Re public of Texas and the subjects of her Britannic Majesty; the citizens or subjects of the two countries respectively shall not pay in the ports, harbours, roads, cities, towns, or places whatsoever, in either State, any other or higher duties, taxes, or imposts, under whatsoever name designated or in cluded, than those which are there paid by the citizens or subjects of the most favoured nations; and the citizens or subjects, respectively, of the two high contracting parties, shall enjoy the same rights, privileges, liberties, favours, immunities, and exemptions in matters of commerce and navigation, that are granted, or may hereafter be granted, in either country, to the citizens or subjects of the most favoured nation. No duty of customs or other impost shall be charged upon any goods the produce of the country, upon importation by sea or by land, from such country to the other, higher than the duty or impost charged upon goods of thy' same kind, the produce of or imported from any other country. And the Republic of Texas and her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland do hereby bind and engage themselves not to grant any favour, privilege, or immunity, in matters of commerce and navigation, to the citi zens or subjects of any other State, which shall not be also and at the same time extended to the citizens or subjects of the other high contracting party, gratuitously, if the concession in favour of that other State shall have been gratuitous, or on giving as nearly as possible the same compensation, or equiva lent, in case the concession shall have been conditional. Art. 2. No duties of tonnage, harbour, lighthouse, pilotage, quarantine, or other similar or corresponding duties, of what ever nature, or under whatever denomination, shall be imposed in either country, upon the vessels, or upon any articles the growth, produce, or manufacture of the other, in respect of voyages between the two countries, if laden, or in respect of any voyage, if in ballast, which shall not be equally imposed in like cases on national vessels ; and in neither country shall any duty, char , e, restriction, or prohibition be imposed upon, nor any drawback, bounty, or allowance be withheld from any goods imported from or exported to any country in the vessels of the one country, which shall not he equally imposed upon or with held from such goods when so imported or exported in the vessels of the other country. Art. 3. The citizens and subjects of each country shall enjoy full liberty to go to the ports and harbours of the other country, where other foreigners are allowed to enter, to unlade their merchandis,. therein, to hire and occupy houses, and peaceably to conduct their respective trades and professions. The ships of war of both countries, respectively, shall have the liberty to enter freely and touch at all such ports in each country into which the ships of war of anv other nation are permitted to enter ; subject, boy ever, to the regulations, laws, and statutes of the respective countries. Art. 4. The stipulations of the present Treaty shall not be considered as applying to the navigation and carrying trade between one port and another, situated in the dominious of one contracting party, by the vessels of the other, so far as regards passengers, commodities, and articles of commerce. Such na vigation and transport lacing reserved by each contracting party to national vessels. Art. 5. The high contracting parties reserve for future negotiation, at such time as they may mutually agree upon, the condition upon which the trade and navi g ation shall be regulated between the Republic of Texas and her Britannic Majesty's colonial possessions in Europe, Asia, Africa, and America. _ _ . Art 6. Whereas, in the present state of Texian shipping, the republic of Texas would not enjoy the full benefit of the reciprocity intended by this Treaty, if no vessel were to be ad mitted into British ports as a Texian vessel, unless it had been built within the territory of Texas; it is, therefore, agreed that for the space of eigl.t years, to commence from the date of the exchange of the ratifications of this Treaty, any vessel where soever built, being bona fide the property of and wholly owned by one or more citizens of the Republic of Texas, and whereof the Master and three-fourths of the marines, at least, are na turalized citizens of the said Republic, or persons domiciled in that Republic by act of the Government as lawful citzens of the Texian Republic, to be certified according to the laws of that country, shall be considered as Texian vessels, her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ire land reserving to herself the right at the end of the said term of eight years, to claim that the provisions of the British Na vigation Act relative to the nationality of foreign vessels shall be strictly applied to Texian vessels in British ports. Art. 7. The Consuls and Vice-Consuls of each country shall. within the territory of the other, enjoy all the rights, privileges, and immunities which are accorded to such i func tionaries by the law of nations ; and it is provided that n the ports of each country, respectively, the authorities shall give all due legal assistance and protection for the apprehension, safe keeping, and delivering of all deserters from the ships of war and trading vessels of either country ; and all the powers and privileges granted in respect to the matters to which the stipu lations of this Article relate, by either of the contracting par ties to any other nation, shall be granted by such contracting party to the Consul, Vice-Consuls, ships of war and trading vessels of the other. Art. S. If any ships of war or merchant vessels should be wrecked on the coasts of either of the high contracting parties, such ships or vessels, or any parts thereof, and all furniture and appurtenances belonging therunto, and all goods and merchandize which shall be saved therefrom, or the produce thereof, if sold, shall be faithfully restored to the proprietors, upon being claimed by them, or by their duly authorized factors ; and if there are no such proprietors or factors on the spot, then the said goods and merchandize, or the proceeds thereof, as well as all the papers found on board such wrecked ships or vessels, shall be delivered to the Texian or British Consul, in whose district the wreck may have taken place ; and such Consul, proprietors, or factors, shall pay only the expenses incurred in the preservation of the pro perty, together with the rate of salvage which would have been payable in the like case of a wreck of a national vessel; and the goads and the merchandise saved from the wreck shall not be subject to duties unless cleared for consumption. Art. 9. The exercise of the rites of religious worship and the freedom of conscience shall be reciprocally secured to the citizens and subjects of each country, by the Government of the other. The rites of sepulture shall be reciprocally ac corded by each of the contracting parties to the other; and there shall be no law passed by either Government that shall violate the rights of property, or Rink the power of bequeath ing personal estate, by will or testament. The citizens or subjects of the one country residing in the other shall not be liable, under extraordinary warrants or otherwise, to compulsory services, or to forced loans ; and on all questions affecting the rights of person or property the Courts of Judicature of the one country shall be impartially open to the citizens or subjects of the other. In the event of a war between the contracting parties, the citizens or subjects of the one country residing in the other shall, reciprocally, have twelve months, after a formal declara tion of the same, to depart with their property and effects, arid without any hindrance or disturbance whatsoever. Art. 10. The present Treaty, when the same shall have been ratified by the President of the Republic of Texas, by and with the advice and the consent of the Senate, and by her Britannic Majesty, shall be binding- and obligatory on the contracting parties for eight years from the date of its signature, and fur ther, until the expiration of 12 months after one of the high contracting parties shall have notified to the other an inten tion to terminate its duration. It is further agreed, that in 12 months after one of the high contracting parties shall have received from the other such no tification, this Treaty and all the stipulations it contains, shall cease to be obligatory upon either party. Art. 11. The present Treaty shall be ratified, and the rati fications shall be exchanged at London, as soon as possible within the space of nine months from this date. In witness whereof, the respective Plenipotentiaries have signed the same, and affixed thereto the seals of their arms. Done at London, the 13th day of November, in the year of our Lord, 1840. (Signed) P A LNIERSTON. (L. S.) J. HAMILTON. (L.S.) FRENCH CARDINALS.—The number of French Cardinals has varied at different epochs. Before the Re velution there were generally four, sometimes five and seven ; and very rarely. ten. In 1791 there were five. Some months after the Concordat of 1801, Napoleon de manded the purple for the Archbishops of Paris, Lyons, 'euen, and Tours, and made them each a yearly allowance t' -nof e , and 45,000 fr. for expenses of installation. o f 30 ' 6 ' -a e on, there were never more than five C4rdi. Under N.rpo. , , craimea to have one-third of the pals; though he . 1. 7 . each Prelates. At the Revo. College composed or only four ; and in Octo. luti rn of 1830 there were , 7wance made by Napo ber of the same year the al: rdinance. The leen was countermanded by a Royal 9 election of his present Holiness , which convinced the French Government of the impor tance of rend followed, maintaining a certain number of Cardinals to represent the interests of France in such an important matter. Ac cordingly, since that time three French prelates have been invested with the purple; viz. , M. de Cheverus , Archbishop of Bourdeaux. in 1836 (he died soon after) ; M. de la Tour, d'Auvergne, Bishop of Arras, last year; and now M. de Bonard, Archbishop of Lyons. In the two first of these cases a sum was voted by the Chambers to maintain the dignity of the function, and the same prin ciple has just been recognized in the case of M. de Bonard, a sum of 45,000 francs having been voted fur the expenses of his installation. There are now (we believe) three French Cardinals, viz., the Prince de Croi, M. de la Tour-d'Auvergne, and M. de Bonard.—Univers. STATISTICS OF THE GREEK CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE LEVANT.—The patriarch has four resi. dences : at Damascus, as patriarch of Antioch ; at Cairo, as patriarch of Alexandria ; at Jaffa, as patriarch of Jeru (otAedf lr i es c the ta c in s i other ro o i f t, ih, Went; on M ount L e b anon, near t h e N at i ona l C o llege B eiDr e 3i y ass r trh, n o coi u se: I Bishops. during. 1 a s il I ,I t o l o i s the aci st tvacancy. ah, n ce t aa r i nlcalactual yt p n.j o na i of l n frT e aßh;i se ba t do h niv e do c r o e efa s s di dioceses e sia n nui c ri b e so.. s , jet to him through the medium of their respective Bishops are : —Archbishoprics, Aleppo, Tyre, Besre, and Aouran, Dierbekir :—Bishoprics—Seede, Beyrout, St. Jean D' Acre, Fourzoles, Balbeek, Tripoli in Syrie, Horns. There are two suffragan bishops and pa.riarchal grand vica s, ore Seinarita Aleppini, the Scinarite Paysani, and at Cairo, the other at Jerusalem. There are three co i. The h e national sacro collegepa i li o. gregations of monks, all of the ceder of Sr. Basil the Ain-trez, diocese of Beyrout. The patriarch is ;fththee Sanctiasmo Salvat ) re. Yorkshire. who transmits to him and confirmed in his autho rity His title is, Patriarch of Antioch and of all the E by the Pope, ast.— Tablet. e itGsh l c ol" e a: t tea e t d by the national bishops, DEATH OF THE DOWAGER LADY STOUR dT i o n e d . — 0 n this lady, w h o She was second daughter and co-heir of Nlarmaduke fifth Lord r o e t co fi r d azi t o li vr e ood demise Hall, o li f Langdale, which title became extinct on hisdeath in 177 7, W M e o Monday last to was married, 15th of June, 1775, to Charles Philip th e late Lord Stourton, by whom her Ladyship had issue a family of ten children, eight of whom survive their mother. ONDON, MONDAY, APRIL 19, lB4l. LAW INTELLIGENCE. VICE-CHANCELLORS', COURT, APRIL 17. INJUNCTION EXPARTE. Mr. KNIGHT BRUCE said he was instructed to move ex parte for an injunction to restrain al indi%idual, the name of whom it was unnecessary, in this stage, publicly to mention, from selling, offering for sale, or in any other way disposing of certain bills of exchange, amounting to 5,000/., until such time as his client bad had an opportu nity of disputing the validity of those bills in a Court of common law. _ The Learned Counsel said, the circumstances on which he made the present motion were shortly these :—Some time since a young gentleman of fortune, and highly con nected, came to London and took up his abode at a fashion able Ironic* the-West•end. After he had been there a few days be was induced to play at cards, and the result was that in one evening he lost 5,0001.: he was not pre pared to pay such a heavy amount, and consequently the next morning he received a letter from the landlord of the hotel (who acted in the capacity of hanker during the Play), stating that he wished to have an interview with hiie, for the purpose of making an arrangement for payment. The younggentleman accordingly waited upon the landlori, and after stow' conversation agreed t gi‘e his acceptances for the amount lost, in bills at three, six, and twelve months, under a faithful promise from the party that he wGuld not circulate the bills until such time as they arrived at mate rity. His (Mr. K. Bruce's) client, however, had ascer tained that this promise was not regarded, and that the party against whom he asked for an injunction, had been trying to negotiate the bills in question in every possible manner ; and as no consideration had been given for them, he asked for the interference of the Court. ThelitcE- CHANCELLOR granted the motion, and ordered the injunction to issue.—lnjunction granted. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, APRIL 17. (In Banco.) THE QUEEN V. THE MAYOR OF DARTMOUTH. In this case a rule had been obtained, calling upon the de fendant to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue directed to him, and commanding him to insert the name of Arthur H. Holdsworth upon the burgess roll of the bors,ugh of Dartmouth. Mr. KELLY now appeared to show cause against the rule. The affidavit of Mr. Holdsworth stated that he resided within a mile of the borough (and of that there was no question), and that he occupied a certain warehouse within the terms of the Act. Now he (Mr. Kelly) contended that the premises in respect of which the applicant claimed to have his name in serted on the burgess roll, were not a warehouse within the terms of the Act. They had been originally used as a ware house, but for several years past they had not been so occupied, Mr. Holdsworth having retired from business. After hearing the arguments of Counsel, The COURT was of opinion that the premises in question did come within th© meaning of the Act, and therefore the rule must be discharged. HARLEY V. CLEMENTS. Mr. Sergeant LUDLOW moved in this case for a rule to set aside the nonsuit and for a new trial. It was an action fir work and labour done and for materials, the plaintiff having been employed by the defendant to build a house for him. The case had been tried before Mr. Baron Gurney at the Stafford assizes, and the plaintiff's ease was gone through with out necessity for the production of any written document. On the part of the defendant a specification and estimate was pro duced with an agreement stamped. and on that the plaintiff had been nonsuited. Nowthedocument contained nothing which would warrant such a proceeding unless that it contained a promise in behalf of the plaintiff to sign an agreement to execute the work according to the specification and estimates, whereon he had been called upon to do so. He apprehended that that could not be treated as an existing agreement of such a nature as would put an end to the action. The document might be read in evidence, but it could tint have the specific effect which had been given to it at the trial. The Court granted the rule. MASON v. KING. Mr. THESIGER moved for a rule to set aside the verdict on the trial of this cause before Lord Denman at the last Surrey Assizes, and for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. The action had been brought against the defendant, who filled the office of Sheriff, for ex tortion of the sum of six guineas in levying under a writ of fieri facias, and a verdict had been given for the plaintiff. Lord DENMAN having read his notes of the evidence given at the trial, the rule was granted. COOPER V. BUCK AND OTHERS. Mr. HUMFREY moved for a rule to set aside the verdict in this cause, which was tried before Lord Abinger at the late Warwick Assizes, and to enter a verdict for the amount claimed by the plaintiff. The action was brought by the plaintiff, who had been employed as reporter, and subsequently as reporter and editor, of the Birmingham Advertiser, against the defendants, who are proprietors of that psper. It appeared that the plaintiff had been originally engaged as repor ter, at a salary of 150/. per annum, and subsequently performed the duties of editor without any fresh contract, but for which he claimed additional salary to the amount of 400/. per annum. The defendants paid into Court the money due upon the origi nal contract, and the Jury, by the direction of the Learned Judge, found that there was no other contract, and that consequently the plaintiff was not legally entitled to recover more, though they said they thought he ought to be paid for his additional services. The Learned Gentleman contended that the Jury were misdirected, and that the defendants had ad mitted their liability for the sum claimed, by the payment of money into Court. On this point the Learned Gentleman cited several cases. Lord DENMAN said the Court would consult the other Judges. BAIL COURT, APRIL 17. (Before Mr. Justice COLERIDGE.) His LORDSHIP took his seat on the Bench at ten o'clock, and heard motions, none of which presented any features of interest, for an hour. The Court then sat at Nisi Prius, and disposed of several undefended causes. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, APRIL 17. ( Sittings in Banco. ) DAVISON V. STANLEY. This action, which was tried at. Liverpool before Mr. Baron Rolfe. was brought by the Commercial Bank to recover from Sir Thomas Stanley the amcunt of several bills of exchange discounted by them upon the acceptances of the defendant's agent, Mr. Blundell, in his (Sir Thomas Stanley's) name. The Learned Judge, in summing up, told the Jury that there was no proof of Blundell's having the defendant's authority to accept the hills in question in his name, and the Jury accord ingly found a verdict for the defendant. Mr. Sergeant STEPHEN this day moved for a new trial on the ground of misdirection. The COURT, after having heard the Sergeant at very great length, were of opinion that the Judge had directed rightly, and that the plaintiff had no case.—Rule refused. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, APRIL 17. (Sittings in Banco.) Before Barons ALDERSON, GURNEY, and ROLFE, Mr. Baron PARKE being absent on account of an accident which befel him on his way to Court. FOSTER V. POYNDER. Mr. Sergeant LUDLOW stated that this was an action for libel, which was alleged to have been published in a cettain weekly newspaper called the Paul Pry, which, if it ever had existence at all, existed so tar back as September, 1838. The action was not against any person connected with the paper; but it was alleged that the defendant, while in Windsor, took a piece of printed paper out of his pocket and handed it to a person, who read it ; that person handed it to another, who also read it, and then the defendant took it away in his pocket. Notice to produce the paper was served ui , on the defendant, and it was very particularly described ; it was not forthcoming, and was said to be either 'lost or destroyed, and the plaintiff pro • eeeded to prove his case. At the close of his evidence it had not been shown that the libel in question had ever been in any newspaper called the Paul Pry, and on that ground he applied for a nonsuit ; hut his Lordship would not stop the case, but reserved leave for him to move the Court, and amended the declarati,n. He contended that the plaintiff having himself tied up his own hands, he was bound to prove his allegations. Probably it would not have been necessary to have troubled the Court had it not been for something which took place after the verdict, which was one farthing damages. In the cause paper, at Reading, stood a cause in which the same parties exhibited, bait their characters were reversed—it was Poynder v. Foster, in which libel the defendant sought damages for a grievous as sault. When the plaintiff applied for a certificate under Lord Denman's Act, his Lordship ( Mr. Baron Gurney) suspended hisjudgment upon that point for a few minutes, in order tc see whether any arrangement couldbe made. An arrangement was made, and then his Lordship granted a certificate. Mr. Baron AtnEasoN—We have nothing to do with that at present—that point will arise on taxation. This was a very proper case for an amendment. You will therefore take no Rule.—Rule refused. BELL V. KNIGHT. This action was tried at Leicester iiefore Mr. Justice Patte son, when a verdict was found for the defendant. Mr. HILL now moved to set that verdict aside. He said it was a case often met with in the books, but very seldom in practice. It was an action against an innkeeper for turninz his guest out of doors. 'I he plaintiff came to the defendant's inn at a late hour, and asked to be shown to a bed-room. He was so, but he said the beds were damp, and refused to sleep in them. He requested to be furnished with a candle, and he would sleep up stairs. This was refused, and the landlord then offered to sit up with him down stairs, but that being refused he became angry, and turned plaintiff out of doors, so that he had to walk six miles to Leicester, very late at night. He (Mr. Hill) might move as against evidence, but he would prefer to do so upon the defectiveness of the plea. It was very full, and stated that the plaintiff came to the Inn when defendant was about to go to bed, and expressed a de sire to sleep in the inn ; that defendant was willing to allow him, and had a bed warmed for him, but that he refused to sleep in the bed provided for him, but requested permission to sit up in an upstairs room, having a candle burning during the night. He (defendant), in fear lest the inn should be burned, refused to allow him, but gave plaintiff permission t , sit tip down-stairs, and offered to give him the benefit of his own company during the night. The plaintiff , however, perhaps m t t a bad taste, refused this magnanimous offer, which so enraged the defendant, that out of doors did he bundle the plaintiff, who thought he had a right to enjoy his whomNe er t e h i o n ug ft sour own company during the silent watc hes of the ni g ht. He con tended the plea was bad. Ho wever, the Jur y , who were all ea bed , t h were farmers, stooubrea of ft4te landlord, a s n t idiip9r4osblaab; n l probably notlawyer, a g , in a and drasidt found hisof fo a dm client, thet p defendant. U n d e r such circumstances hp was at a loss to know whether to mov e for judgment, non obstante Terediet o a venire de novo, or a new trial as against evidence. The COURT said he had better take the rule nisi in the alternative.--Rule granted. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, A PRIL 17. (Pore Mr. Commissioner Bow Es.) the IN THE MATtgli OF THILLIP S TEPHEN HARRISON. The insolvent was an irowaroogpr, and carried on bu s i ncfs at the well known sign of the " Little bust Pp," in Holborn. A flat of bankruptcy had been is sued against him sotne timil back, and most of his credit ors si g ned the certificate. H e taoseiriiimbedinhliquginetostmens:yantdo ttoheieifvrailetizrer onfs:go;rne soal petorsons indebted stance of his trying to force his establishment into notoriety, 2,0001. In September Lot.llgtenwehii:etriemdiet 9 h r e s ,fisrsthfeelhiainaimo many by winch he lust a great deal in advertisi9 in the daily ;L a weekly pap(as vd the periodicals. His I .7.!'ilities were about ticulties, his stock in trade e ll:a: is :: j o b ': beside§ which, he was possessed of freehold property in Kentish t th io e n s o ol f ic h it is or a s ss t e o ts th a e m fi o a n t x , and he Ittith Town. Ti k e insolvent stated he had been three months In pri son, and that in coming to this Court he acted by the advi ce o f was a,:v i l s h h f l' or s9 the l. execution creditors, who would take precedence of the ;: es t. He was supported by Mr. Cooke, and opposed on the i)a r t of a creditor named Abraham Bateman, by Mr. Nicholls, 'Who stated that the insolvent was indebted to his client in the sum of 10!.. on which, by vexatious litigation, he accumulated the sum of 121. costs. The Learned Counsel was proceeding i n his opposition, when a Creditor stood forward and said, that so well satisfied were the body of creditors with the insolvent, that sooner than have any opposition for so trifling a sum a s the present, they would pay Mr. Bateman the amount of hi s demand.—. The opposition Olen dropped. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MAN,SIO.2V-HOUSE, A young man of dark complexion, and black woolly hair, named Williams, was charged before Sir Peter Laurie with having robbed a number of churches of bibles and prayer books. Upon this occasion several sextons and pawnbrokers, as well as a few owners, were in at. tendance. The prisoner, who is a person of exceed ingly serious aspect, leaned over the bar with his hands clasped in the attitude of prayer, as if in the very act of supplication. The sexton of the church of St. Vedast, in Foster lane, stated that on Tuesday last there was a meeting of the vestry at the church, and witness descried the prisoner walking round and looking at the tablits. Soon afterwards the prisoner was seen walking out, and seemed to have something concealed about hint, and witness asked him what he had, to which he replied that he always carried his bible and prayer-book about with him when he went into nlace:s of worship. Wit ness thought the prisoner's hat was rather awkwardly placed upon his head, and took the liberty of examining it. He found in it two prayer books, and in the pri soner's pockets a bible and another prayer-book. City policeman No. 426, said that after he had taken the prisoner into custody, he found that the pious•look ing persan had robbed seventeen or eighteen churches of prayer books and bibles, the duplicates of which were found upon him. Sir P. LAURIE (to the prisoner)—Why, you live by the church ?—(A laugh.) Prisoner—No, Sir, I am a labourer. I only go the church now and then. The sexton said that the prisoner had been at the church on two or three Sundays previously, and no doubt for the purpose of ascertaining where the best books were kept. Mr. J. Powell, of Cheapside, warehouseman, stated that the Bible and three prayer-books, belonged to him, and had been all left in his pew. There were two other prayer-books in the pew, but they were worse than those which were stolen by the prisoner. The sexton of Bishopsgatc church stated that he knew the pris ner as a church-goer, and that the pew in which the prisoner had last been was robbed of two prayer-books of the value of 1/. each. Mr. Thomas Fox, of Bishonsgate-street Within, stated that a Bible and two prayer-books were missing from his pew on Good Friday. He afterwards was in formed that a pawnbroker had the books, and he found that they had been pledged. Mr. Elliott, a pawnbroker, stated that the prisoner had pawned the B ble and two prayer-books at his shop, and what was rather extraordinary in his (witness's) own name.—(A laugh.) Sir P. LAURIE—You asked him the usual questions? Mr. Elliott—Certainly, and he answered every question without hesitation. Several other sextons, recognised the prisoner as a visitor. They stated that the prisoner plundered on the Wednesdays and Fridays, hut mide his observations on the Sundays, when he doubtless marked out parti cuter pews for his visits. He always, it appeared, seemed very attentive to his religious duties. A screw-driver, which must have been useful to him in opening the despositaries in which books were kept, was found amongst the duplicates. Sir PETER LAURIE—I suppose you wish to say nothing ?—The prisoner, who still remained in the at titude of prayer, shook his head.—He was committed for trial. Three young men, named Brown, Taylor, and Smith, were charged with having stolen a piece of cloth in a shop in Bishopsgate-street. The prisoners, who were all exceedingly well-dressed persons, were dis tinctly seen to walk into the shop and whip the cloth from the ground. Tney were apprehended and made a desperate resistance, swearing that the police never should take them. A mob of thieves endeavoured to rescue them. Two solicitors attended for the pri soners, but the ease was so clear against them that they did not think it would improve their chance of escape to make a single observation.—They were committed for trial. MARYLEBONE. Mr. James Jinsale, a livery-stable keeper and home dealer, in Duke-street, Oxford -street, was charged with assaulting a man named Bull. The evidence went to show that the defendant had advertised a horse for s.de, and that complainant was employed by another horse-dealer to perambulate the streets in front of the defendant's house with a placard cautioning the public to beware of " horse advertising, horse chauntering, pretended gentlemen, and sham livery servants." The complainant was desired to move on, but he refused to do so, when the defendant struck him and broke the board over his back. The defendant was fined 20s, and the employer of the complainant was given to understand that the an noyance was of a highly disgraceful character. HATTON-GARDEN. Yesterday Mr. 14'illiatn Woodward, landlord of the Rose public-house, Hatton-zarden, appeared before Mr. Coombe to answer the complaint of John Wilkes, driver of the cabriolet No. 361, for having refused to pay him 12s. for his hire. The complainant, being sworn, stated that on Tuesday night last ,be was driving his cabriolet in Hatton-wall, when a person called him and ordered him to proceed to the defendant's house to take up a fare. On his arrival the defendant said ha was a poor man, and he wished to be informed what he (witness) would take twa ladies to Clienics street, Tottenham-court-road, for ? Witness said Is. 4d., which the defendant refused to give him, and the ladies did not ride with him. The defendant, however, darei him to leave, as he had hired him, and to go away at his peril, or if it cost him 101. he would punish him, and he remained with his horse and cab until the following morning, when he applied to this Court for re dress. Two police-constables, of the G division, gave evi-: dence to show that the complainant remained all night at the efendant's door with his horse and cab, and that Mr. Woodward called one of them into his house as a witness that he had engaged the complainant, and dared him to leave at his peril. Mr. COMBE asked Mr. Woodward what he had to say in answer to the complaint? He replied that his mother-in-law and another lady (a relative) made a call at his house, and he ordered his servant to hire a cabriolet, and the complainant came to his house, and on asking him what he would take the ladies for to Cbe• nies-street, Tottenham-court-road, he demanded is 6d., and being aware that there could not be an e'ghteen: penny fare, and that the legal fare was for a mile, he refused to pay him that demand, but offered him n shilling, which he refused to take, but he dropped down to Is. 4d. ; and he certainly did say that he had hired him (the complainant), and that if he dared to leave without taking his fare he would prosecute and punish him. He still persisted in having Is. 4d. and a pint of beer, and the lades were obliged to walk home, and the complainant thought proper to remain all night before his (witnes,'s) house with his cab. However, he anticipated Mr. Woodward, as he intended applying for a summons against him for refusing to take his fare, an attempt at extortion, and refusing to show his badge when called upon to do so. When he refused to take the shilling he got upon the box to drive away, when he (Mr. Woodward) dared him to go or he would punish him. Mr. COMBE told the cabman, that he had got into the wrong box, and he ordered that he and Mr. Wood ward should change places, and Mr. Woodward was sworn, when he reiterated his defence, and produced two witnesses to confirm his evidence. Mr. ComeE told the defendant that there was no such fare on the bock as eighteenpance, although cab men frequently made that demand. He had grossly committed himself by refusing to take his fare and not producing his badge when called upon to do so, and he convicted him in the penalty of 205., informing Mr. Woodward that, he was entitled to hilt the penalty. George Jukes, a gardener, residing at Bats-pond, Islington, was placed at the bar, charged by Ellen Bans grove, a pretty-looking young woman, with having in termarried with her, whilst his former wife was living. The prOsecutrix having been sworn, stated that she resided at Nort hold, Harrow. The prisoner, about 12 months ago introduced himself to her as a single man, and paid his addresses to her, and they were married, and the result was the birth o p t' a child. The prisoner deserted her and the infant, and she was afterwards in formed that he was a married man with a family, and he was living with his wife at 13.alls•pond, Islington, when she c une to London Ind gave him into custody. Police Constable, No. 18, N division, proved having taken the prisoner into custody. When, prior to being informed the charge, he said, " I know what you want me for, I can't keep two of them." The prisoner did not deny the charge, but. said that the prosecutrix had her husband alive when he married with her. Prosecutrix—Yes ; but my husband was transported for life, and I am not aware that he is alive. Mr. COMBE told the prisoner that he Was not war• ranted in marrying the prosecutrix, and he would com mit him for trial. A new point of law might be raised upon the subject, but that would be left for the eon. sideration of the Judges before whom he would be tried. John Seymour, the driver of the cabriolet, No. 427, and :Mot King, at other cab driyer, was placed at the bar, charged with having driven over Rebecca Emmett, an elderly woman residing at the Camden-town Alms houses. • It appeared in evidence that on Wednesday night lest, about nine o'clock, the prisoners were on the box, whilst King was driving at a furious rate in Tottenham court-road, when the injured woman, who was crossing the road, was knocked down and run over, by which shp was seriously injured, and taken to the North Lon don Hopital t viberp she now lies in st dangerous state. The prisoner Seymour was drunk at the time, and ling had been drinking, but was not so drunk. They had had no badges with therm The prisoners said they were driving at the rate of six miles an hour, and they called out to the woman before she was run over, The MAGISTRATE informed them that in the event of the woman's death they would be involved in a serious predicament, Sdymour had no right to,; have another person on the bon with him ; Qi t o &I:- mq.3111,11.01. yes Victoir-s. ,y the Abbe Bautain for t►me they have had to encounter trom their friends. In a word, they have renounced friends and fortune to follow Christ. The ce -..,er remo ny was in the highest degree edifying.—Univers. up his reins, and their being in the performance of an illegal act would operate ngaimst them. They were remanded. THAMES OFFiGE. Henry Laver, landlord of the Mechanics' Arms beer shop, in the Ferry-road, Isle of Dogs, Poplar, was charged under the police act with harbouring a police man while on duty. Parker, a police sergeant, No. 5 K, stated that at half-past ten o'clock on the night of the 7th instant he was passing the bcer-shop, and saw a police-constable who should have been upon duty, in company with a female, in the house. They were both standing in font of the bar. Thomas Brown, a police-constable, No. 256 K, stated that he was upon duty in Mid-wall, which was a very dark and unfrequented road, and was met by a female, who requested him to see her along the Wall and pro tect her. He complied with her reque;t, and she invited him to partake of a glass of ale at the defendant's house, and he unthinkingly did so. The "good lady" called for the ale, and a glass of it was poured out be fore he entered. He waa not in the house more than three. minutes. He had a great coat and his armlet on. Ile did not know whether the defendant could see the armlet, or knew he was on duty. The defendant, in reply to the charge, said he did not know the policeman was on duty. The woman called for the ale, and the policeman entered afterwards. He would rather shut up his beer-shop than such an occur_ rence should happen again, Inspector May said the policeman was in full dut dress, and was arrnad with a eadas3. Tnis announce ment excited great surprise, but it was said that many policemen were armed with swords and pistols. Mr. BALLANTINE said the defendant * had harboured the policeman while on duty, and fined him 22., and 2s. casts. WORSHIP-STREET. William Drake, a shoemaker, a Chartist, appeared before Mr. Broughton to a summons, charged by John Golding, a quandom Chartist, with having unlawfully threatened him so as to put him in fear of his life. Mr. Hunt, a solicitor, attended for the defendant. The complainant, who stated that he was a preacher, and lived at No. 7, New Clifton-place, said that last Sunday evening he was at the Hull of Science, City road, to hear a lecture. He entered the place ab.,ut seven o'clock, and was on the platform. About twenty minutes past eight o'clock he was pointed out by the defendant, who was in the body of the meeting, and who exclaimed that he was a government spy, and a policeman in a disguise. He soon after got on the platform, and made use of the same expressions, and added that he had betrayed the Chartists, and sold poor. Boggis. The tifeet was to cause a momentary disturbance, which he (complainant) succeeded in quiet ing by assuring him that the imputation was false. But when he was on the point of leaving, a man, who appeared nearly drunk, came up to him, and said that he should like to run a hole through him. Two or three others also called him a scoundrel. In answer to Mr. Broughton, tl:e comphinant said that he was in fear of his life in consequence of the charge, as there were many ignorant men, who were led by the more designing Chartists, who talked of stabbing policemen, and setting fire to houses, who would not mind doing him some personal injury. Mr. BROUGHTON inquired what sort of religion was professed in the lectures delivered at the Hall of &i -nce ? The complainant replied, that they were certain tenets of the Rev. Richard Carlile, and he explained then, to the Magistrate, observing, that Mrs. Cathie delivered the lecture that night in the absence of her husband, who had been attacked with paralysis. Mr. BROUGHTON—When was he seized with a paralysis ? Complainant—Last Sunday fortnight, at the Hal. of Science. The complainant, being questioned by the defendant's solicitor, said that he was formerly one of the Chttrtist ceders; and Le left them some months ago, when many were taken into custody. To his knowledge he never gave aivice to the Chartists to take arms to defend themselves. But he knew that the defendant did. He denied ever having given any information to the Go wrnment against Boggis, or any Chartist. John Brett, cabinet-maker, Catherine-street, City road, confirmed the evidence of the complainant ; and said that when the man went up to him, he remarked that, as he was an enemy to the Chartists, he should like—when the complainant said what would you like ? —the man remarked, " I should like to make a hole through you." Another witness having confirmed the evidence, Mr. Hunt said that the charge was scarcely worthy of a reply, since he was able to state that the difference between the complainant. and defendant arose from the former having seceded from , the Chartists, and, it was believed had given information to Government in refer ence the proceedings of the Chartists. Mr. BROUGHTON remarked that it was no matter what might be the religious opinions of any one, they equally should have the protection of the law. The charge was fully proved, and he should hold the de fendant to bail to answer the charge at the sessions, if the complainant thought proper to take it there. The defendant was held to bail, himself in 401., and two sureties in 20/. each. Many of the leading Char tists were present, and a Chartist shorthand writer took notes of the proceedings. 111.11 TA SHIPPING.-ArRIL 5. ARRIVALS OF SHIPS OF WAR AND PACKETS. MARCH 30 —The British steamer Oriental, Captain Soy, from Alexandria. 31. Her Majesty's steamer Acheron, Corn. A. Kennedy, from Gibraltar. April 4. The French Government steamer Leonidas, from Con stantinople, Smyrna, and Syria. DEPARTURESoF SHIPSoF WAR AND PACKETS. MARCH 30. The Alecto, for Marseilles. 31. The Oriental and Peninsular Company's steam-pt.eltet Oriental, Captain T. Soy, for Gibraltar and England ; the Oriental and Peninsular Company's steam-packet City of London, Captain W. D. Evans, for the lonian Islands. April I. Her Majesty's steamer Phcenix, Corn. Richardson, for Beyrout. 2. Her Ma jesty's ship Thunderer, Capt. M. F. F. Berkeley, for Syracuse. 3. Her Majesty's frigate Carysfort, Capt. H. B Martin, C. 8., for Corfu; her Majesty's steamer Gorg.m, Capt. Henderson, for Alexandria. 4 Royal Yacht schooner Gitana, Corn. J. Proctor, for Candis; her Majesty's transport Apollo, Com. W. White, for Gib raltar; her Majesty's frigate Edinburgh, Capt. Hencer son ; her Majesty's ship Bellerophon, Capt. Austen, C. B. 5. The British steamer Loftus, Capt. J Moody. In Port—The Prnccss Charlotte, 120, bearing the flag of Admiral Sir R. Stopford, G C. 8., G. C. M G. ; Ceylon, 6, bearing the flag of Rear-Admiral Sir J. Lo u i s , Bart. ; Powerful, 86; Howe, 120; Benbow, ; Hastings, 72; Vanguard, 80; Carysfort, 36 ; Castor, 36 ; Dido, 18. Surv , yi..g vessels Beacon and M:gre ; steam-frigates Vesuvius, Cyclops, Stromboli, and Ache ron ; steam-packets Megazra, Locust, and Prometheus. French steam-packets Mentor and Sesostris, and Ottoman schooner without name. SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. (LLOYD'S.) Lortnort, Aram 17.—Wind this day at noon, S. S.W., light breeze, and cloudy. DEAL, APRIL 16.—Wind S., moderate.—Arrived from the River the Advocate, for Severn Roads. Arrived from the River, and sailed the John, Craig, for Prince Edward's Island ; Champion, Gibraltar; Lusitiana,:Oporto. PLYMOUTH, APRIL 16. —Wind N. N.W.—Arrived the City of Edinburgh, from Sierra Leone. Sailed the Cosmopo lite, Cleverly, for Quebec. FALMOUTH, APRIL 15.—Wind S.W. to N. W., fresh breeze.—Sailed the Bragilla, Richards, for Quebec. SOUTHAMPTON.—Arrived the Sarah Ann, Cavenagh, from Youghal. DARTMOUTH, APRIL 14.—Sailed the. Nancy, for Resti gouche The Keehing, from Charleston to Altona, and Tri ton. from Maranham to Hamburgh, had not arrived as re ported. COWES, Aram 16.—Arrived the Fortuna, Peterson, from Paraiba. Sailed the Pilot, and Prince George, for Quebec. SWANSEA, APRIL 15.—Arrived the Camoens, Baird, fern Valparaiso ; sailed 30th October, and I{io Janeiro Ist January. LIVERPOOL, APRIL 16.—Wind \V.—Arrived the Esther, Heron, from Calcutta • Duchess of Portland, Ray, Trinidad ; Diana. Bourtell, Natchez ; Maria Lowther, Pearce, Kertsch ; Ora, Ockleman. Altona. Sailed the Zenobia, Putman, for Macao • Amelia, Barbadoes ; Shakspeare, New York ; New Jersey, ; Ann, Jeffrey, Quebec ; John and Robert, ditto ; Scotland, ditto ; Oberon, ditto ; Herald, Montreal ; Scipio, Newfoundland ; Traveller, ditto ' • Fisher, ditto; Woodst oc k, St, John's, New Brunsw ck ; Velocity, Halifax ; Aurora, Cape Breton; Rival, Africa; Trio, Adra. Arrived off the Hay ward, from Africa ; Golden Fleece, Paraiba. Coax, APRIL 14.—Arrived, the Ann, from Buenos Ayres; Alert, Monte Video. A large steamer has passed the har bour, bound up Channel. KINSALE, APRIL 14.—A large steamer, supposed the Pre sident, has pissed the harbour to the eastward, carrying a good press of canvass, with the wind at N. W. SHIELDS, Aram 15.—Sailed the Catherine, Jamieson, for Sydney, New South Wales ; St. Laurence, St. John's, New Brunsxick. SUNDERLAND, APRIL 15.—Sailed the Robert Raike3, for Quebec; Jubilee. ditto. _ HULL, Arittr.',l6.—Wind S.W. by W., moderate.—Sailed the Glenoria, Mack, for Quebec. Arrived the Jasmine, from Amsterdam ; Williams, Hambnrgh ; Active, ditto ; Leeman, Bremen ; Freidereck, keel ; Anna Ma r i a , ditto ; Hoffnung, Rom , beck ; Vixen, Dunkirk. . The Swan, Liverpool, to Monte Video, Ist instant, lat. 39, long. 13. VESSELS SPOKEN WITH.—The Lady East, 25th February, lat. 3 S, lon. 19 ; Cowslip, of Newcastle, for Havannah, 13th ult„ lat. 20, lon. 84, by the Washington, arrived in the Downs, Packet, Marseilles to Liverpool. and Matia Hardy, Swansea to Cub,, 31st ult:, lat. 38, lon. 14; Catherine, Troon to Malta, Bth, lat. 45, lon. 10, by the Jul , ania, a-rivel at Bri•tql. Findon, of Poole, for Que bec, Bth instant, lat 47, lon. 3 ; Thistle, Wa.erlord. ditto 10th, lat. 48, lon. 10 by the Louisa, arrived in the Downs. Colombia steamer, Liverpool to Halifax, 7th, lat. 50. lon 19, by the Humphrey, arrived in the Downs. Samuel Enderby whaler, from London, on the coast of Chili, by the Juhn Wills. arrived at New York, J ansen, Lisbon to Monte Video, 221 February, long. 15 , 1 -at. 35, by tite Canada, arrived at Boston, JEWISH CONVEBSIONS.--oit Satu r d ay l ast two young Israelites , sist ers. belongin g to one of th e b ea t families in Stra-bourgh made a public abjuration , aml • ceived baptism in the church of Notre Dam. They had he •n under instruction 4 some years, dui i 4 whiP t • much OpPot;°- MOWNING EDITio THE 11 A Iti*: 6TS-SAT KDAY NESVGA - I'E AND LEADENHALL. The sup .ply of Game and Poultry was fair ; trade mo del ; and price s the same as last quoted. Eggs in good suPl' 4s. 6d. to 5 3 . p er 120 f or E ng li s h ; an d 3 s . 6d. to 4?. P et ,l for Plovers. M ea t i n goo d supp l y , par ti cu l ar ly Muttoth,_ met a dull sal e . Oth er ki n d s went off steadily at the f olio' prices :—Beef, 33. 4d. to 4s. ; Mutton, 3s. Bd. to 45 1 Veal, 4s. to 5s 4d ; Lamb. ss. 6d. to 6s. 6d. ; and ss. Bd. to 6s. 6d. per stone of Blbs. IykIITECHAPEL MARKET. nt The supply of Meat was fair, with little variation in Veal sold well, the quantity being under the demand. 0 1 3s. 4d. to 4s. 6d. ; Mutton, 3s. 4d. to 4s. 6d.: VO L ' 55. 6d. ; Pork, 3s. 83. to ss. 4d. ; Lamb, 4s. Bd. to 6 6 % r , Clover, 41. 15s. to 61. ; Meadow Hay, 31. 12s, to Ji• 375. to 40s. TEA MARKET . Prices of Free Trade were firm, a ci d a fair demand exi l for most kinds. Company's Congou sold steadily at Is' cash. The deliveries from the vkarehouses k e ep good. TALLOW MARKET. The chandlers were free buyers of Rus s ia n Tallow, anjcse:erli o illi parcels were taken by the soapmakers. Prices for P. , ids were firm at 475. 9d. to 48s. on the spot, arid fur delivery last three months 48s. 6d. was asked. SPIRIT Al ARKET. of I°l Brandy is more in roquest, and prices firmer- rtinn A ro be quality sold freely, but fi ne sons were dull of sale, a n d - Cor i cheaper; Geneva steady at 2s. a 2s. Id.. British Spirits sold well at 9s. 10,1., cash. METAL MARKET. English. Iron in large d eman d, an d p r i c es firmer' 0 94 0 attracted more attention, and p r i ces impre.vetl. 11 ' 61 fair demand for Tin, and 74s 'Ad for bars.. COUNTRY CUR AF Ivo°. Oat .. L'eafa• Per Quarter. Abingdon Andover B nbnry Basi gstoke Cirenc-ster Coventry Daventry D3rbv Howilen s. to s. L 6 fig 5, Cb 51 tit 10 t;8 5 63 4. to S. :8 34 • 31 • 32 • 34 2:i 32 4. to s. !;2 30 27 23 2S 24 s . to '• I ;i T . .; 42 1., _ .... 40 45 _ 46 63 72 C 6 70 3S 44 29 35 23 34 :28 a 9.5 t• 9 :i3 30 44 40 51 - 37 40 43 HungerfOid Malton Mai. en head Nottingham Wastage %Vat wick 50 71 7 , ! 52 75 r 2 i 0 6.3 SO 32 37 115 38 32 38 26 35 :34 4 31 •10 25 33 2.2 33 9Z 34 2 , % 27 26 :12 29 38 __ ... 40 48 47 0 . 36 4t) Winchester York i 70 62 72 Per Bushel Birmingham s. d. 70 S s. (1. s. d. 39 4 9 s. d. s. d.1"4 s (1. 1 . 1. 31; 40; 'a is 15 EDINBURGH CORN MA ItKET. real Wheat. 1 Barley. I Oats. l.seaill; P 0 First 76s. 04 35s Od. 130 s. SA, 44a. to. .... • Second 63 0 33 4 ) 26 0 30 0 ... ]'hind Average price of Wheat .......... ........ 3 /. as,'" , i Id PRICE OF PROVISIONS. Si C.. , si 10, Beef, per nr. .......... Us. 6d. S to Os.Bd. Freshßutter, lb. If .,' 0 Mutton ...................« 0 6 0 8 Salt Ditto,. ... 1", 1 1 .1. Veal ..........«........«....... 0 8 1 0 Ditto, per ea t. « UTv i 0 P0ra—......--............. 0 5 0 7 Eggs, per doz. « 0 0 0 0 Lamu, per qr. ««5 I) 7 0 OatStraw(kpl.).. I 0 i 0 tallow, c1vt.........3 . J 0 41 0 Wheat Ditto..,, 6 • 0 0 2aartern Loaf ........ U 9 001 Barley Ditto ..... 5 • Potatoes, 141 b. ....« 0 3 0 4 Hay, per 5t.......... 1 EDINBUROH MEAL MARKET n o I Per Sack of 280Ib. Imp. Per Stone of 1 0 , , i 16 , Fiist Oatmeal ~, Second ditto Birleytncal. ........... Peazenseal 1 8 0 Peasemeal ......... Pot Barley from 283. to 455. per WIC „I CORNWALL MARKETS. (Calculated at 24 gallons to the bu5he1.) ...:.._.. ,_2 , c 0 ' e. Wheat. Barley. 4. go b$ 0 1. Truro 0 710d.t0 r. d s. d. 3 twS. d s• 0 $ 0 0 8 0 $ 0 Heistane St. Austell 0 7 6 0 3 4 .... 0 0 $ 0 Bodnun 0 88— 0 4 4 0 $ '..,iskeard 0 7 6 —II 3 6 0 $ O , Launceston — 0 7f • 0 36'7 6 st CamQl ford 7 0 7 8 3 8 4 ii . 0 Pcurance 7 4 8 6 0 4 0 ”" . , - _ _ - iS itt n i e BRITISH MUSEUM —The number of v during the week, ending yesterday, was 19 ,140 1,6 91 ' Easter Monday there were 13,351, on TuesdaY Wednesday 2,129, Thursday 733, and yesterday, Aye' The visitors during the week have been prin cl P - 0 01 the middle and working cla , ses, and the admissioa!atiss, persons only were refused on the ground of On Monday twelve extra constables of the A l o se were on duty, but not a singe case of robbery or loft occurred requiring their interfer once. On 811 ,, ° 1 :0 1 : 1 , occasions the duties of the police in this est aw- ,:sts,'", are entrusted to police-constable Reason, A 121 ' 1. "" holiday times has the assistance of an extra f o rce. re' numbers this year have f.l!en far short of those t il ,, o th e vious occasions; as on Easter Monday, in 183 7 . %soli' Museum was first opetrai for inspection during day-week, the number of visitors exceeded 31, 0 °isish THE MARCH OFCIVILIZATION.---'rhephinco, steam ships bring us lots of British papers, 13: 1115 . see B r ips time o, British laces, gingham, calicoes, broadcloths, lery, and plate ware ; British sovereigns ( s ° lne r, boA' British gentlemen, British books, British tourists ae",, makers; in short, everything but British par"' be l hich last the • price of passage is too high a figu re rc ; ( lo, toe " ev,iry thing" includes an article of British P s o p ; tion, which we can neither wear, invest, sell, resoueo welcome—British burglars and pickpockets; gesitleog the swell mob—the real Linden article of tip WI ) q bad The recent extensive robberies in Boston have awe br a suspii:ion that a deputation of these fancy geodetic le, $O 6 arrived, and commenced business on a dashing se ° Oct' we learn from the Boston papers that a friendlY o . ° 00 tion has been rec iced by the authorities of that el t sei the police of London, " that the most artful robbe A ir FOREIGN' had to con.end with is now in the United States."- - ' rican Paper. g 11# SUGAR, --According to a 1- 1 • of made to the 1 - louse of Commons, on the motion Murk } • f f sugar 9 , the t o tal quantity o er fined and entered for home consumption, between t of January, 1840 and the sth of January, 184,11011 B I 2,315 cwts. Of this 1,543 ewtc. were itnportrp(i Brazil, 289 cwts. from Cuba. arid 419 ewts. frotot ° It appears from the sante return that the total 1 0 01 ) ; sugar refined in bond expontel from the sth of 0 5 re 1840, to the latest period to which the aceoolo. 01, made up was 120,999 cwts. Of this 72,92 5 ° fl oe exported from London, and 48,074 cwts. frog gro'i, ports. The principal exports were as follow s t". 1 151 , 1 4.695 cwts. ; Spain and the Canaries. 5,64 2 21 019 cwt.. ; lonian B Ines, 3.748 ewts• 1. - b e / 12 327 cwts. ; Australia, 4,407 cwts. ; and r ill Indies. 5,528 cwts. r. - - ntj , GOLD WATCHES, LONDON - 114 1cer ors A. B. SAVORY and SONS, Watchmakers, No; ', e lee t ,': of London, opposite the Bank of England, submit t er - 0 11°' of very large STOCK of GOLD WATCHES, tbe„,,to,eo. which are made and finished under the careful 0 5, experienced workmen on their own premises, an d egc ranted for correct performance. SIZE FOR LADIES. „ Fine Vertical Watches, jewelled, in engine-turn e d l " gold cases and gold dials, warranted ..........•• .• Fine Vertical Watches, jewelled, with double' 0 backed engine -turned gold cases andgold 1 4 2 1° warranted ............................ ........... Patent detached Lever Watches, jewelled in four hole=, i r t holei, with double-backed gold cases and V , ' 1 4 dials, warranted ............................ SIZE FOR GENTLEMEN.. Patent detached Lever Watches, jewelled is four is 0 holes, seconds, and double-backed gold cases 1 5 warranted Patent detached Lever Wat c h es , capped, j 1 7 ° in six holes, seconds, double-backed gold cases 17 and enamel dials, warranted ....................... Patent detached Lever Watches, capped, jewelle d 0 (I in six holes, seconds, double-backed gold nos es 9 1 ~o l d and gold dials, warranted ......................... .• ha d in t ", Either of the Gentlemen's Watches mav second hunting cases for 3/. 3s. each extra. P1. 13 ' - Watches purchased in exchange. the joA PAPIER MACHE TEA TRAYS. o u ': of FULL SIZED GOTHIC SHAPE. Su l'd er slo ; . 10 01; Table Knives, with ivory handle s , 14s. Pee Id • r e ' ,. gp , Poles for Window Curtains, 4 inch (li a meter, l ,s' 1 0 4 "Or 2 inches, Is. aid. per foot ; bronzed fenders, 4 ir e i e derh ir or Catalogues gratis, containing the prices of stoves, hing irons, kitchen utensils, and every article in furors s et' mongery. a .or RIPPON and BURTON, Wells. streets Gofer Established 1820. 1 31 BIRTS. tag v At Mickleham Hall, Lady Altert H Conyngharn• o f t he WV 1 On the 10th inst., at The Lodge, Caermorth ent Henry Rid -nit Downman, Esq., of a daughter. do f 1 1 ' On the 12th inst., at Forest Hill, Notts, th e is i, Pickard, Esq., of a son. v o f L On the 14th inst., at Beltield, T.ifesh;re, the ' a _ a ' s o l . a' nant- Colonel Moncrieff, Scots Fusilier Guards , o On the 15th inst., at East-place, Lambeth, t` the of a son. aaor l i On the 16th inst., in Chailes-street, Berk ele y -s ' . lady of C. Tyrhitt, Esq., of a daughter. foste r ' On the 12th w inst., at Lextlen Rectory, near C ole lady of the Rev. John Papillon, of a son. ocl‘ On the 18th inst., in Rome, the lady of Sherl Esq., of a son. oft MARRIED. voti li° to On the te 15th 11teh Thomas , at as T .St h . o l r i n a t n o c n, ras Eq Church, s.ro son of the Elizabeth Evelyn, eldest daughter of Charles Dorm s ately of Bexley, Kent. 6er to , On the 16th at St. George's, H amee r-sqlln ee t o it Parker Bushe, Esq., Attache to her Majesty's Log,,tiols,seilt Court of Hanover , to LauraGeor and o giana,df the aug Lad o ; d a ughter SmyStmh,yatnh'dogfrailnda edathU Yorkshire,ghter of the Duke of Grafton. e ideit On the 13th inst., at Blickling, Charles William, stil t !" viving son o f Robert Mar sharn , Esq., of Stratton Grioi Norfolk, to Emily Louisa, third daughter Regis el o f the Macdonald, Chief of Clanronald, arid granddaughter ell Earl of Mount Edgcumbe. IC°ll 4 On the 15th inst., at Leamington, Charles Johnore,, Tynte, Esq., late ALP. for West Somerset, (4 or o f Brabazon, Esq., of Rath House, county Louth. hi , rt s ibt of stably,G K .C m . e H y s.G,lofrn daughter o f the ist On the 15th inst., at W eymouth, General Sir a s eh t , o , of the late Colonel Van CortlandtNiidd leosfethetomCanbtaterlP,r-Stil;',l' On the 15th inst., at Chelsea, James Brent,tu_giate Tynte, c°ainaorp,fsdheilinraelii,mitil.oe:vl i i n i e o e u n s t e i , a, Somerset, an las, Tunbridge Wells, to Lady Colebrooke, re iet of r E. Colebrooke, Bart., of Colebrooke Park, gen•of At Northamton, France D s, l d E au D a pr. ' Ode rton, Vicar of Aldbourne, Wilts, aged 66. oreor ' On the 16th inst., Mary Ann, wife of George Esq., l4 of Great Dean's-yard, Westminster , aged 7 to ll' ,o hter of the late ~ii On the 15th inst., John Kynaston, Esq.,oole• . J orge 0 lb ° On the 14th inst ol , at Claydon Rectory, ~, Ref. c, W O g n the riht, aged 67- if• 14th inst., at Wood's F arm Lodge, Susse%, he tli Knowlys, Esq., aged 90. 10' ,' On the 16th inst., in ' i Hyde Park. 5 , 0 1 Goore, the wifo ^` David sixforn-square, „. --,1,,, one o f I,- David Pollvk, of the Malt 1 Ile el u r co' ..er Majesty's Counsel. ut-0 11it' On the 11th inst., Mrs. Blunt, the wife of Lie l g. neral Blunt, of Shirley , S outham p ton. On the 14th inst., at Walthamstow, T. Wilson, Es(l'.', London: Printed and Published by AIURDO 1(9„,114$1' ‘ l, No. 11'2, Strand, at The Sun Otlife, No. 12, '`. the eointy of Middlesex.--31ondiy, April 19, 1841 .. re- 1 Wheat. Barley. EYE 4 A t'tc Monday(i'l 11Ei A the EarlE arl c . a .: : .ArriCal:hl:( I,4l:insiderin tt: I,NJ the e Colonial asresp e I , the future co ',e measures nec tild thereby aver ales, , CH/1114.Es Snored b ache 'ggreg: Ditto Dias k o n tho Rep( eetited t o tl I N Nia Was k i B ,hiPs,und viz. 4 CY rnaleat NZ has not lit'nee. As, 4 1 z arantine at is, inde by Bou 4t ,and the taoved Resolved at thus th, u t Zlty sy tar t of 17 1 17,di et , that sv: ,Z 4 from all 1 1 1 ,75ing it en V the It South `Fi'Y under At Wa s mai kie : r in e t s:l e v r e; kt l hat this e n has 1 t4 ,1_ 1 4 virtue "er strieth t h at Go , sued N I certair O t lng entii i iit q alditi on bY the ( Y, the ( of ti. . eason to supply v lialld earl r ed by Resolves ,44t11at these tO g 0 greatl th e minish, r P 'OlCn • flock the im t k ,' cannot 1q, 4 1 , 1 1 o f t in %tr e the OYin et `u by nat Sttkl't.tztt• tt, c t% ti a to , Hari Qp • ISsIC 11 d P':.FC' td h °urabl kt ido t 4 tern a nd Whi e l mil t 1 . 1 of F, t° r l ,"tiltire \'V ai "'roisl ll 1114s r ; I t h t a 1 1 1 7 e t i NIL i 4 Uti Cat;; t's - tit,cd °ve tt b Il e 'on tti 11 3 (.14 N rf,, A Iltoyed Iles( t; l 'hat t ta4 dar 4 , d txt th ey 111:"ed Ated Car ‘ at t Z. P; 40 ii Si ; .4; / .... , - is